Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-05-06_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / EDINA COUNCIL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 6, 1985 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL MINUTES of April 1, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARING - Amendments - Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan A. Resolution - Edina HRA B. Resolution - Edina City Council II. PUBLIC HEARING - Sale of Land in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area A. Action by Edina HRA - Sale of Land B. Action by Edina City Council - Consent to Redevelopers' Agreement III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading A. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 - Edinborough - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west of York Avenue B. Preliminary Plat 1. The Village in Edina - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west of York Avenue IV. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - HRA /City of Edina EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Lot Division B. 1. Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor - 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane Set Hearing Dates (5/20/85) 1. PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located in the northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street 2. Final Development Plan.- Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems - Generally located west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street 3. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District - Generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue 4. Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert - 7010 France Ave. So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor Addition II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Two Traffic Control Signal Systems (Eng 485 -2) B. Public Improvements - BA -263, P -14, P -15 and 85 -3 (Eng 485 -3) C. Concrete Curb and Gutter 85 -4 - Arneson Park (Eng 485 -4) D. Weed Harvesting - Mill Pond /Mirror Lake E. Administrative Vehicle F. Radio Base Station - Fire Department G. Public Officials Liability Insurance /Police Professional Liability Insurance IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Release of City Property - Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition B. Plan Approval - Hennepin County /Crosstown Ramp C. Homart Development of France Avenue Drive -In Theatre - Bloomington D. West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive Traffic Signal E. Policy on Sale of Park Property F. City Insurance Renewals G. Legislative Breakfast - May 24 - 7:30 a.m. H. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council I. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Agenda Edina City Council /HRA May 6, 1985 Page Two V. FINANCE. A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for.payment of the following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50, Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming Pool Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07, Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range ;Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265.58, Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Cohstruct16n Fund $19,721.04, Total $459,947.19. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / EDINA COUNCIL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 6, 1985 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL 14EETING ROLLCALL MINUTES of April 1, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARING - Amendments - Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan A. Resolution - Edina HRA B. Resolution - Edina City Council II. PUBLIC HEARING - Sale of Land in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area A. Action by Edina HRA.- Sale of Land B. Action by Edina City Council - Consent to Redevelopers' Agreement .III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading A. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 - Edinborough - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west of York Avenue B. Preliminary Plat 1. The Village in Edina - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west of York Avenue IV. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - HRA /City of Edina EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. '3 /5.favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Lot Division 1. Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor - 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane B. Set Hearing Dates (5/20/85) 1. PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located in the northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street 2. Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems - Generally located west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street 3. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District - Generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue 4. Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert - 7010 France Ave. So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor Addition II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS A. Two Traffic Control Signal Systems (Eng X685 -2) B. Public Improvements - BA -263, P -14, P -15 and 85 -3 (Eng 485 -3) C. Concrete Curb and Gutter 85 -4 - Arneson Park (Eng 485 -4) D. Weed Harvesting - Mill Pond /Mirror Lake E. Administrative Vehicle F. Radio Base Station - Fire Department G. Public Officials Liability Insurance /Police Professional Liability Insurance IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Release of City Property - Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition B. Plan Approval - Hennepin County /Crosstown Ramp C. Homart Development of France Avenue Drive -In Theatre - Bloomington D. West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive Traffic Signal E. - Policy on Sale of Park Property F. City Insurance Renewals G. Legislative Breakfast - May 24 - 7:30 a.m. H. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council I. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Agenda Edina City Council /HRA May 6, 1985 Page Two V. FINANCE. A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50, Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming P6ol.Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07, Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265:58, Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Construction Fund $19,721.04, Total $459,947.19. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 15, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Turner, and Mayor Courtney. (Member Bredesen arrived at 7:20 p.m.) RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION FOR EDINA HIGH SCHOOL TEAMS ADOPTED. Mayor Courtney pre- sented the following resolutions of commendation for Edina High School athletic teams which were unanimously adopted: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' SWIM TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Swim Team won the 1984 Conference, Section, and State Championships; and WHEREAS, success in these Championships has been the result of their extra - ordinary ability, hours of practice and dedication to the sport; and WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have brought to the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to member of the team: Martha Baumgartner, Sara Bergman, Tara Bergman, Victoria Dow, Trish Franciosi, Jenni Frandeen, Emma Garforth, Lori Heisick, Kirstin Kendig, Karen Kozar, Kirsten Larsen, Mindy Mikan, Maura Ries, Stephanie Seveland, Lyn Tierney, Claudia Vieira, Lori Wilbur and Ann Wohlrabe, and to thecCoaches Ann Anklam and Michael Daly., BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the Championship Team. ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' TENNIS TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Tennis Team won the 1984 Lake Conference, Section VI, and State Championships; and WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Tennis Team established an enviable record in the State Tournament by winning the Singles Championship and Doubles Championship, and success has been the result of their special ability, hours of practice and dedication to the sport; and WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have brought to the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to members of the team; Kelly Anderson, Laura Bassinger, Suzanne Blietz, Aileen Furlong, Martha Goldberg, Ginger Helgeson, Michelle Houser, Jennifer Moe and Jennifer Nelson and to Coaches, Charles Anderson and Bruce Clare; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the Championship team. ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985. . RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' GYMNASTICS TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina Boys' Grmnastics Team won the 1984 State Championship, and completed an outstanding season of performances; and WHEREAS, the Edina Boys' Gymnastics Team has won its second State Championship; and WHEREAS, success in the State Tournament has been the result of their special ability, dedication to the sport, and for their behavior in a manner reflecting the credit they have brought to the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations be extended to the members of the team: Frank Barnes, Jonathan DeLeon, David Engh, Timothy Fulford, Erik Gl6erson, Charles Lim, Matthew Maguire, Christopher Nelms, Bruce Nordstog, Steven Petry, Troy Stende, Lam Truong and Coaches Bob Hoecherl and and Bert Selsbach.' BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that appropriate copies be given to members of the Championship team. ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' GYMNASTICS TEAM WHEREAS, the Edina High School Girls' Gymnastics Team has completed a successful 1984 season, winning the Lake Conference, Region 6AA, and State Championships; and WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have brought to the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their special ability, hours of practice, and the leadership of their Coaches; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, on behalf of the Citizenry as a whole, that all members of the Edina Girls' Gymnastics Team be publicly commended for their outstanding accomplishments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the members of the Championship Team: Sarah Anderson, Jennifer Ducar, Toni Manske, Kelly Meredith, wrl 4/15/85 Melanie Peacock, Jody Shanedling, Tiffany Utendorfer, Michelle Wise, and to the Coaches, Kit Olson and John Reardon. ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985. BICYCLE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAIMED. Mayor Courtney read the following proclamation for Bicycle Safety Week: BICYCLE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAMATION As Mayor of the City of Edina, I call upon all members of this community to give their wholehearted support to the 22nd Annual Edina Bicycle Safety Program which has traditionally been sponsored under the united efforts of various Edina civic organizations. The purpose of the Program is to- reduce the hazard of bicycle riding for young bicyclists, as well as for pedestrians and motorists. The growing congestion of our streets and highways daily increases the dangers for the careless or unskilled rider. Reports of hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries each year throughout our nation (due to collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles along) have alerted us to the need for such a Program. By training our boys and girls, at an early age, in proper riding skill, by teaching them the laws govern- ing bicyclists, by explaining the reasons for obeying safety rules and by helping them to be aware of the hazards of biking, we feel that Edina is making a concerted attempt to assure that the number of accidents does NOT keep up with the ever - increasing number of bicyclists. The energy crisis may even now be creating the need for our adults to use their bicycles as a means of transportation for short haul errands. It behooves us all to become thoroughly familiar with the "rules of the road" to minimize the incident of accidents. We should all remember that a bike is no longer just a toy, but a vehicle to be taken seriously. The safety of our children cannot be relegated to a once -a -year campaign. I call for the support of every parent in carrying out this campaign all year long and I urge every youngster to participate in this Bicycle Safety Program and then to practice what he has learned - for his safety as well as for the safety of others. As Mayor of Edina, I hereby proclaim the week of May 5th to be Bicycle Safety Week in Edina. PROCLAIMED this 15th day of April, 1985. ROGER SORENSON COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Roger Sorenson and said that Mr. Sorenson has been employed with the City since 1965 and -that he will be.. retiring on April 22. He has worked in the Park Department as a Light Equipment Operator and has been a dedicated, hard - working employee. Mr. Rosland_commended him-for his many years of fine service to the City and presented him with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council joined in thanking and commending Mr. Sorenson for his outstanding employment record. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 AUTHORIZED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman advised that last November the residents of Westwood Court, located off Schaeffer Road, had presented a petition for watermain extention improvement. Proposed construction would be to loop the watermain extention around Westwood Court back to Schaeffer Road. The improvement would require excavation of the street in order to construct the watermain extention and then the reconstruction of the street. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated cost of construction for Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -353 at $65,734.60, proposed to be assessed against 12.assess- able lots....at.$5,617.95 per lot, with.-credit to Lot 8, Block 1, Westwood Court of $1,680.74. If.approved;.construction of this improvement could be accomplished in 1985. Assessments would then be levied in.1986 with the initial installment due in 1987. The improvement is proposed to be assessed over a ten year period, with an annual rate of interest to be charged on the unpaid balance not to exceed the amount allowed by law. -The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court. No comment or objection being heard, Member Turner moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly publi hed and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 IN THE FOLLOWING: Westwood Court and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 ` 4/15/85 and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include: Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots l thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION. Planner Gordon Hughes recalled that the Council gave preliminary approval to the plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition, generally located west of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway, as origi- nally submitted at its meeting of June 18, 1984. Later the plat was amended to include some additional portion of the Cross View Lutheran Church property. Council approved the revised Mat on December 17, 1984. The proponent has now returned with the final plat and is seeking final plat approval and rezoning approval. Mr. Hughes recalled that Lots 1 thru 7 of the plat are proposed for R -2 zoning; the balance of the lots 8 thru 15 will be single family lots; Lot 16 is retained in church ownership. Several months ago a conditional use permit was granted to facilitate the expansion' of the church. Preliminary plat approval was granted, subject to these conditions: 1) subdivision dedication, 2)developer's agreement, 3) conservation restriction covering the wetland area, 4) grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer extensions, 5) grant of D.N.R. permit, and 6) petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and gutter on McCauley Trail West. Mr. Hughes stated that all the conditions have been complied with except for the conservation restriction. The executed conservation restriction has not been received and the final plat approval should include -.that as a condition. He pointed out that the final plat defines that area as a drainage and utility easement, but the conservation restriction would add other restrictions as to what could be done in the area. A subdivision dedication report has been pre- pared by staff and final plat approval and rezoning is recommended. Mr. Hughes noted that final rezoning requires a 4/5 favorable vote of the Council and that the rezoning could be continued to the meeting of May 6, 1985 if Member Bredesen did not appear. No objection or comments being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to receipt of an executed conservation restriction and payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $22,000'.00: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Indian Hills 2nd Addition" platted-by The Minnesota South District of the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit corporation, and Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were resented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for the William C. Hansen Addition, generally located south of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive. The proponent is requesting a two -lot subdivision of the property resulting in one new building site. The new lot would measure approximately 92 x 121 feet and contain 11,137 square feet.in area. The subject property measures approximately 200 x 121 feet and is 24,206 square feet in area. It is developed wi -th a single dwelling fronting on Johnson Drive and located on the southerly portion of the.site. The lot retained for the existing dwelling would measure 108 x 121 feet _and would be 13,069 square feet in area. The dwelling on.:the site complies in all.respects with the zoning ordinance from the standpoint of lot coverage and setback from the new lot line. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the dwelling on the site is served with sanitary sewer and water from Grove Street. It would be necessary to relocate these services if a dwelling were constructed on the new lot. The proponent has agreed to the relocation of those utility lines to a new easement provided along the east property line. The Community Development and Plan- ning Commission reviewed the plat on March 27., 1985, and recommended approval of the subdivision, subject to 1) subdivision dedication, 2) relocation of existing utilities, 3) relocation of existing driveway to Johnson Drive. The proponent has agreed to relocate the utilities and driveway prior to final plat approval. In response to a question of Member Turner regarding lot size in the neighborhood, Mr. Hughes stated that neighboring lots are comparable in size. No objections or comments being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) subdivision dedication, 2) relocation of existing utilities prior to final plat approval, and 3) relocation of existing driveway: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "William C. Hansen Addition ", platted by William C. Hansen and Patricia G. Hansen, husband and wife, and Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan Association, a )fib 4/15/85 Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. (Member Bredesen entered the meeting at this point on the Council Agenda.) PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR EDINA HIGHPOINTE II. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the request for preliminary plat approval and final deve- lopment plan approval for Edina Highpointe II, generally located West of Cahill Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended. The subject property measures 2 1/2 acres in area and is presently occupied with two single - family dwellings. Mr. Hughes stated that this is one of the few essentially vacant properties in the City that was zoned in connection with the new Zoning Ordinance adopted in March, 1984. Prior to that time this property was zoned R -3 Multiple Residential District. The property was rezoned to PRD -3 Planned Residential District in conjunction with the enactment of the new Ordinance with the provision that the Community Development and Planning Commission and the Council must approve final development plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant has thus submitted the final development plans for.review and approval. Mr..Hughes said that the final plans include a site plan, grading plan, floor plans and elevation drawings. A 26 -unit condominium building, which equates to 10 1/2 units per acre, is proposed for the site. The proposed building will be complementary in terms of style and materials to the applicant's 16 -unit condominium building, Edina Highpointe II, locate&-directly to the north. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the site grades from an elevation of 872 at the northeast corner to 838 at the southwest corner. The applicant has designed a building that steps down from the north to the south to take advantage of this slope. The result of this design is in essence two 3 -story buildings which are joined at the lobby area. The lowest floor of the northerly portion of the building in nine feet higher than the lowest floor of the southerly portion of the building. This results in a building which is four stories in height at the lobby. The Zoning Ordinance limits building height to three stories in PRD -3. Therefore, a variance is required. All other aspects of the project comply with the Ordinance. The applicant has also submitted a one -lot plat of the project as required by the Zoning Ordinance. As reported to the Planning Commission, staff believes that the final development plans represent the same exceptional quality as the High - point project to the north. The only modification of the plans requested is to increase slightly the radius of the front driveway to meet the requirements of the Fire Department. Staff would also recommend that the variance be granted for the four -story element of the building, based on these reasons: 1) the applicant has attempted to design a building which is sympathetic to the topo- graphy of the site, 2) the four -story condition occurs at only one corner of the rear of the building, and 3) that an excellent design will be fostered by the grant of this variance. Staff thus recommends final development plan approval and preliminary plat approval, subject to 1) final platting, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3) review of the final grading plan by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit to assure proper drainage. Mr. Hughes stated that Ron Clark, proponent, was present to answer any questions. Member Turner asked if-the landscaping plan meets our criteria because of the close proximity of the buildings, and also asked what the distance was from the pro- posed building to the closest Oak Glen building. Mr. Hughes replied that the same size landscaping material is expected as was used on the first Highpointe building which generally has been oversized material. He pointed out that the proposed building maintains a 35 -foot setback, that the closest Oak Glen build- ing also has a "35 -foot setback, thus providing a 70 -foot space between the two buildings. No comments or objection being heard, Member Turner moved adoption of the following resolutions for preliminary plat approval and for final deve- lopment plan approval, including granting of the variance for the four -story portion of the building: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR EDINA HIGHPOINTE II BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Highpointe II ", platted by Ronald E. Clark, and presented at the regular meeting of the City_Council of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, subject to final platting and subdivision dedication. RF.g0T.T1TTI)N BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Edina Highpointe II, generally located west of Cahill Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended, be and is hereby approved, subject to review.of the final grading plan by the Engineering Department prior to issuance of a building permit. \a\ 4./15/85 Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Turner commented that, in terms of the variance, she had made the motion for approval because of the topography of the site and the uniqueness of the building design. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolutions adopted. HEARING DATE SET FOR FINAL REZONING - VILLAGES IN EDINA (EDINBOROUGH). As recom- mended by staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen setting May 6, 1985, as the hearing date for the final rezoning for Villages in Edina, the new proposed name for the Edinborough project. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO 825 -A4 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING; R -2 ZONING APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION. Mayor Courtney stated that, with the arrival of Member Bredesen, the - Council would now hear the request for final rezoning of Indian Hills 2nd Addition, generally located west of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Hughes recalled that the request is for rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District for Lots 1 thru 7,.Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd Addi- tion. The final plat which was approved by the Council earlier in the meeting was for a sixteen lot subdivision with Lots 1 thru 7 proposed for R -2 zoning, Lots 8 thru 15 will be single family lots and Lot 16 is retained in church ownership. Staff would recommend that final rezoning.be granted. No comment being heard, Member Turner moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A4 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd Addition." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor VACATION GRANTED FOR PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on.file. Mr. Hoffman presented the petition of the owner of Outlot A, Edina Green, for vacation of a portion of the Lincoln Drive right of way. He explained.that the area requested to be vacated is part of an old right of way for Lincoln Drive which was vacated approximately ten years ago. The property owner is now asking for release of the old right of way over a portion of Outlot A. Northern States Power Company has asked that an existing 10 foot front easement be retained to protect their existing underground cable. Staff would recommend that the vacation be granted, subject to reserving the author - ity.of Northern States Power.Company to maintain their underground cable line. No objection being heard, Member Bredesen moved adoption of the following resolution, with the condition that the 10 foot front easement be reserved in favor of Northern States Power Company: RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 25th day of February, 1985, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of Lincoln Drive right of way; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 15th day of April, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to, be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects exist- ing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation lam 4/15/85 affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street easement or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Henne- pin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the Lincoln Drive right of way be and is hereby vacated effective as of April 16, 1985: That part of Lot 4, Block 2, and of Outlot A, Edina Green lying within a 60 foot road easement as per Document No. 3909691. Said road easement is described as follows: Beginning at a point in the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 31, distant 185 feet West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition; thence South parallel with the Southerly extention of the West line of said Addition 23.31 feet; thence Southwesterly 196.66 feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 440.1 feet; thence Southerly 198.54 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of 672.63 feet; thence Southerly tangent to last described curve 85 feet; thence Southeasterly 280.36 feet along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 318.42 feet; thence Southeasterly tangent to last described curve 205.5 feet; thence Southerly 331.88 feet along a tangential curve to the right having a radius of 275.72 feet; thence Southwesterly tangent to last described curve 112.74 feet; thence Southerly 284.14 feet along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 370 feet to the center line of Lincoln Drive as platted in the-plat of Nine Mile North and there terminating. PROVIDED, however, that after due consideration, the Council has determined and hereby specifies that the foregoing vacation shall not affect, and there is hereby continued, reserved, and retained, the following existing easement and authority in, on, and under the above vacated area: The City of Edina reserves in favor of Northern States Power Company an existing ten foot front utility easement within said described vacated street for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for otherwise attending to, underground cable lines required to provide electric service to customers along this route, and that the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR STREET SWEEPER.. Mr. Rosland presented tabluation of bids for purchase of a street sweeper showing Itasca Equipment Company at $59,913.00, MacQueen Equipment, Inca at $62,830.00 and Sweeney Brothers Tractor, Inc. at $71,960.00. Staff would recommend award of bid to MacQueen Equipment, Inc. because Itasca's bid does not meet the bid specifications in many areas. It was noted that Itasca Equipment Company has been advised of the recommendation. No comment being heard, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for street sweeper to MacQueen Equipment, Inc. at $62,830.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TORO GROUNDSMASTER FOR GOLF COURSE. Mr. Rosland presented tabu- lation of bids'for purchase of a Toro Groundsmaster showing MTI Distributing Company at $6,344.00, Cushman Motor Company at $6,720.00 and Goulds, Inc. at $6,805.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder MTI Distributing Company at $6,344.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 4/9/85 APPROVED; RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT WEST 78TH STREET /BUSH LAKE ROAD. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 9, 1985: 1) That the Edina City Council adopt and forward a resolution to the Hennepin County Board supporting the installation of traffic signals at West 78th Street and Bush Lake Road, 2) That the City enhance signing and striping on Cahill Road to establish clear right turn and left turn lanes, 4/15/85. 3) That the City enhance signing and striping on West 78th Street to include a right turn lane to northbound Cahill Road and a "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign for the same traffic movement, 4) That the Traffic Safety Committee should monitor and review all new data deve- loped on the intersection, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, development along 78th Street in Edina and Bloomington has caused heavy traffic congestion, and WHEREAS, a traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street would alle- viate some of that congestion, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes that traffic signal warrants are met at said intersection; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council hereby urges the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to take positive action, along with Blooming- ton, for the installation of traffic signals at East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street at the earliest possible opportunity. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. SLIDE PRESENTATION GIVEN ON LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT. Mr. Rosland introduced George K. Isaacs, Technical Advisor -Light Rail Transit, who gave a slide presentation on Light Rail Transit (LRT). He defined LRT as a transit system using rail cars elec- trically powered from an overhead wire, on preferential rights of way. The slides showed various LRT systems in operation in the United States, Canada and Europe. Mr. Isaacs pointed out the-following advantages of LRT systems: stations are simple; helps reduce pollution in downtown areas; is fast, comfortable and reliable in all weather; will reduce the total subsidy need of the MTC in the metro area; is labor productive and for riders, fares and transfer privileges will be the same as for buses. University Avenue is little used for vehicle traffic because of I -94 and could be the first corridor of 9.5 miles costing approximately $120M; the second corridor could be Hiawatha Avenue and the Southwest corridor could be the third line. Estimated costs for the 36 mile LRT system proposed for the three corridors is $363M. LRT will cost about $10M per mile for track, vehicles, stations, parking lots, etc. For comparison, I -394 will cost about $40 M per mile. Mr. Isaacs noted that LRT will not replace buses but will supplement buses and highways. LRT relies on buses or vans to collect riders and feed traffic to the LRT trains. LRT.cons *_ruction is.proposed to be financed from existing tax revenues, mostly from a portion of the existing state motor vehicle excise tax already devoted to transit, and the existing transit property tax levy. Mayor Courtney thanked Mr. Isaacs for.the presentation. No Council action was taken. PLAN CONCEPT APPROVED FOR IMPROVEMENT TO RAMP FROM T.H. 100 TO EASTBOUND CROSSTOWN HWY. Mr. Hoffman recalled that about two years ago the Council had asked the Hennepin. County Board of Commissioners to make some safety improvements to the Crosstown Highway on the section from the east boundary of the City to Tracy Avenue which has experienced the highest accident rate in the City. The County has proposed five improvements to the highway, one of which is to redesign the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown to bring it more gradually into the flow of traffic and to provide an acceleration lane. Mr. Hoffman showed a- graphic of the proposed improvement which showed that the ramp would use a portion of the frontage road area which is under the jurisdiction of the City. Hennepin County is requesting that the City allow usage of the frontage road area for construction of the safety improvement. As a result, the realignment would bring the ramp closer to the adjacent homes with the new fence moved inward approximately 10 feet between the ramp and the new fence. Mr. Hoffman reported that City and County staff members had met with area residents on March 29 to hear their concerns, their major concerns being noise levels and proximity of the ramp to their homes. Staff conclusion and recommendation is as follows: 1) For the proposed improvment, separate the issues of safety and noise, 2) As to safety, approve the proposed plan with the understanding that the County will incur all cost except landscaping and privacy fences, 3) The Council should consider to what extent additional privacy fences and /or landscaping would be done to improve screen- ing at least along the Murphy and Stang residences, and 4) If Council wishes, conduct additional fact finding from all residents along the Crosstown Highway 62 and Highway 100 as to attitudes on sound walls and interest in financing same. Ted Hoffman, Chief Design Engineer with Hennepin County, stated that it is the policy of Hennepin County to not retro -fit any County highways with sound barriers. He pointed out that if a noise wall were to be constructed at the location it would have to be approximately 1,100 feet in length to isolate the three homes at an estimated cost of $100 per lineal foot. The proposed ramp redesign is a "tag along" I Q `/ 4/15/85 project for some resurfacing and curve correction to the Crosstown Highway. With regard to the safety /noise issues, Mr. Ted Hoffman said that the redesign should eliminate the accidents caused by people over - reacting when entering the east- bound Crosstown Highway traffic because of no taper area in which to accelerate, and the noise source is the Crosstown Highway itself. Appearing and speaking in support of the neighborhood petition requesting erection of a sound barrier wall to protect and buffer the neighborhood were Philip Dugan, 6324 Parnell Avenue; Donald Stang, 6320 West Shore Drive; Fred Johnson, 4717 W. 64th Street; and James Ewald, 6321 Parnell Avenue. Mr. Ted Hoffman clarified that if the Council did not approval the plan for the ramp the County would not redesign it and would only work on the other other proposed improvements on the Crosstown itself. Member Turner stated that she felt the neighbors' concerns about safety and noise were separate issues. With regard to the safety issue, she asked that the County look at constructing a guard rail at that area. Member Turner stated the noise issue involves a policy decision for the Council and would require time to explore it. Member Bredesen said he agreed with Member Turner and that information should be provided that would indicate to the Council and the neighbors whether or not a guard rail would reduce the possibility of vehicle accidents. He added that the noise abatement issue could involve enormous costs and that discussion should be pursued at.the State and Federal level as to possible solutions. Member Bredesen then moved concept approval of the proposed plan for the eastbound ramp from T.H. 100 to Crosstown 62, with the contingency that the.County provide additional safety information and options to the City Engineer to be reported back to the Council, together with possible options for resolving the noise issue. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HOMART DEVELOPMENT OF FRANCE AVENUE DRIVE -IN THEATRE DISCUSSED. Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the Homart development of the France Avenue Drive -in Theatre in Bloomington had been discussed at the last Council meeting as to its impact on Edina from a traffic and aesthetic standpoint. Since then, staff has investigated ways in which the City may influence the magnitude of the proposed development. The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process has commenced and on April 2 staff members attended the scoping meeting to request that certain items be studied thoroughly. It was requested that the impact caused by vacant land in Edina be included in the EIS analysis for traffic on France Avenue and I -494; primarily the 85 -90 acres of undeveloped land owned by Hedberg & Sons Company. Mr. Larsen noted that the Metropolitan Council has asked that the available sewer capacity be studied. Except for a required grading permit from the Nine Mile Creek Water- shed District, the only permits the development requires are from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA). The major concern of the PCA is likely to be air pollution caused by the increased traffic. The City's request to consider the development of Edina's vacant land in the analysis could have a significant effect; however, the PCA is required only to consider the subject development. Staff has provided Bloomington with data indicating expected development intensities of vacant land in the area. With regard to the requirements and process for a review of metro- politan significance by the Metropolitan Council, a resolution by the City Council would be necessary to initiate the process. If the Metropolitan Council finds the development to be of metropolitan significance, it could delay construction of the project for up to one year and could identify modifications which, if complied with, would cause the construction suspension to be lifted. Mr. Larsen pointed out that if the City's concerns are not addressed or answered by the EIS, we can object on the basis that the EIS is inadequate. However, this decision is made by the Bloomington City Council. If Bloomington finds that the EIS is adequate and they are able to secure PCA permits, they would not be further obligated to consider the City's objections. Mr. Rosland commented that he had met with the Bloomington City Manager to discuss the.proposed development and they had concluded that the Edina Council members should lobby the Bloomington Council to encourage them to reduce the magnitude of this development. Mayor Courtney stated he would contact the Bloomington Council members he knew to try get them to consider reducing the project. Member Turner suggested we also proceed with initiating.the metropolitan.significance review of the project. Attorney Erickson stated that the timing of the review may be important in order to extend any possible delay on construction of the project. Key elements in such review would be the proposed project's effect on existing or planned land use or development and the transportation issue. Member Bredesen asked if the developers are seeking any special tax financing for the project, such as a tax increment district or revenue bonds. Mr. Larsen indicated he had not heard of any such proposal. It was informally agreed that the staff would continue to follow through on the EIS process and that the Council Members would try to contact members of the Bloomington Council regarding the City's objection to the size of the proposed development. v� 4/15/85 PLANS APPROVED FOR EDINAMITE '85 TO BE HELD AT WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland said that he had received a letter from The Edina Foundation Board of Directors asking that the Council approve their plans for Edinamite '85, the annual benefit for the Foundation, to be held on July 13, 1985, at Wooddale School and that they be authorized to remove and sell items such as bricks, hardware, etc. from.the building as mementos. The proceeds from the benefit would go to The Edina Foundation, with a part of the monies allocated to the Edina Historical Society for their projects. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the date would allow for the building to be vacated by the August 1, 1985, date set by the Council. Staff members would supervise and direct the removal of the various items. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to approve the Foundation's plans for Edinamite '85 to be held at Wooddale School on July 13, 1985, and to authorize the removal and sale of any items from the building as mementos, under the supervision of staff. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION. Mr. Hoff- man reported that petitions for improvements for Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Water - main and Graveling in the plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition had been received, signed by the developer. Said petition also requested that the entire cost be assessed against the property of such owners. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated construction cost.for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -370 at $76,803.01, proposed to be assessed against 22 connections at a cost of $3,491.05 each; Storm Sewer Improvement No. P -ST.S -176 at $53,262.76, proposed to be assessed against 15 lots at a cost of $3,550.85 each; Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -355 at $48,024.58, proposed to be assessed against 22 connections at $2,182.94 each and Graveling Improvement No. P -C -143 at $16,245.35, proposed to be assessed against 9 lots at $1.805.04 each. As recom- mended by Mr. Hoffman, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370, STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -176, WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355 AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain and Graveling Improve- ments in Indian Hills 2nd Addition and that the developer now owns all property which will abut and be assessed for the improvements and that said petition has been signed by all owners of all abutting property which is owned by the developer. 2. The making of said improvements in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designed and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -176 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355 GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143 The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on said Indian Hills 2nd Addition where said improvements are to be located. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -33 AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION (WEST 492 STREET). Mr. Hoffman advised that a 100% petition has been.received for a sidewalk improve -. ment on West 492 Street adjacent to the Peterson Building, which is located east of the municipal parking ramp. The building has been. remodeled _to..accomodate.several small shops and the petition for the sidewalk improvement includes removal of the loading area formerly used by Peterson Appliance Center, who has now moved out of the building. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated construction cost for Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -33 at $6,340.58, proposed to be. assessed against the owner.at $5,630.58, with an estimated $710.00 to charged to the 50th and France Maintenance Assessment. As recommended, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33 BE IT RESOLVED by the City,Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct a Sidewalk Improvement on West 492 Street, and to assess the entire cost against the property of the petitioners, and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property abutting on said street where said improvement is to be located. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961, I6, 4/15/85 Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33 The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be directed against the properties abutting on said West 492 Street where said improvement is to be located, with an estimated $710.00 to be charged to the 50th and France Mainte- nance Assessment. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. MINNEGASCO LEAKAGE CHECKS /STREET REPAIR DISCUSSED. Member Kelly said she was con- cerned with the numerous holes being dug in the City's streets by Minnegasco to check for possible.gas leaks. Mr. Hoffman explained that Minnegasco is embarking on a project to check for gas leaks in the entire metropolitan area and that approximately 1,200 house connections will be checked in Edina. Apparently the coupling used for service to each.home in the period of 1962 -67 is now deteriorating and must be replaced when leaks are detected:. This results in a 3 x 4 foot hole being dug in the street and it is the responsibility of Minnegasco to replace the street surface upon completion of the coupling replacement. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that Minnegasco has to apply for permits to do this work for which the City charges a fee. An inspector will be hired for the summer to check each location to insure that Minnegasco fills the holes they have dug in streets correctly. No action was taken. MEMBER KELLY REPORTS ON POLICE RIDE -ALONG EXPERIENCE. Member Kelly reported that she was very impressed and proud of the expertise shown by the Police Department during her recent night.patrol.trip with the department, and that it had given her much insight as to the various things they must deal with. EXPO 85 SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20 -21. Member Turner reminded the Council Members of Expo 85 scheduled for April 20 -21, 1985, and thanked them as well as members of the staff who have commited their time to -this community event. MLC APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FORMULA NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised that the Municipal Legislative Commission is working on a new Local Government Aid Formula, which is one of six to be presented to the Minnesota Legislature, and that the Commission will be voting on the proposed formula on Wednesday, April 17. Under the formula Edina is the only city in the MLC that does not get an increase. Edina is grandfathered in on Local Government Aid on what we have received in previous years. Mr. Rosland stated that he felt we could support the proposed formula for these reasons: 1) they are not putting as much money into the total pot by raising taxes, and 2) the formula is based on amounts.levied and not on what cities have expended as in the past. He added that he had advised the MLC's Operating Committee that the proposed LGA formula would have Edina's support if it could be tied into the total tax program, one of which is the new formula for homestead credits based on 1% of market value up to $70,000, or up to a $700.00 exemption which would be a benefit to Edina's property owners. Member Richards would be voting to support the proposed LGA formula unless the Council objected. No action was taken. 7TH ANNUAL ALL VOLUNTEERS AWARDS RECOGNITION SET FOR MAY 7, 1985. Mr. Rosland advised that the 7th Annual All Volunteers Awards Recognition is scheduled for Tuesday, May 7, at Interlachen Country Club from 5 to 7 p.m. He urged the Council Members to attend if their schedules permitted. CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that Bob Sherman is unable to chair the City Hall Space Study Committee, but that he will serve on the committee. Member Richards will continue to work on.the chairman position so that the committee can then be activated. AGREEMENT ON ACQUISITION OF HEDBERG RIGHT OF WAY FOR EDINBOROUGH PROJECT APPROVED. Planner Gordon Hughes advised that he had reached a tentative agreement with Hedberg and Sons Company for acquisition of right of way for Parklawn Avenue pro- posed to be constructed for the Edinborough project. The westerly half of the right of way is located on property owned by Hedberg and Sons Company and would need to be acquired prior to proceeding with the project. Mr. Hughes explained that the amount of right of way to be acquired is 58,900 square feet, and at $4.00 per square foot would be valued at $235,600. He noted that $4.00 per square foot was used because that was the price for a recent sale from Hedberg to Hennepin County for part of the France Avenue project. As part of the construc- tion of the street, if normal practices were applied for assessment, Hedberg and Sons Company would be assessed $153,270 for the actual construction of the street. C a� 4/15/85 The proposed settlement with Hedberg is as follows: 1) Hedberg conveys right of way at no cost to City, 2) City agrees not to assess Hedberg for improvement, and 3) City agrees to give Hedbergexcess gravel from right of way. Staff believes the City would acquire the right of way below market value or what we could expect to receive from condemnation and would recommend approval of the agreement. Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager be and they are hereby authorized to execute an agreement for acquisition of Hedberg right of way for construction of proposed Parklawn Avenue for the Edinborough project, as outlined by staff. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR HANSEN-ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING AUTHORIZED. Engineer Hoffman advised that the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has sent the cost participation agreement for installation of a new grade crossing signals and sur- fact for Hansen Road. During the Hansen Road project of 1985, MNDOT determined that the crossing was eligible.for construction under the Federal Safety Program. The estimated total cost is $155,630.00 with a $15,563.00 local...share. Ninety percent of the funds would be federal and the remaining ten percent would be local and would be eligible for reimbursement thru State Aid Funds. Staff would there- fore recommend approval of the agreement. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina enter into an Agreement with the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway, Inc. and the Commissioner of Transportation for the installation and maintenance of railroad crossing signals and the crossing surface at the intersection of Hansen Road with the tracks of Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway, Inc. in Edina, Minnesota, and appointing the the Commissioner of Transportation agent for the City to supervise said project and administer available Federal Funds in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Section 161.36 (1984). The City's share of the cost shall be ten percent of the.total cost. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager be and they are hereby authorized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City. Motion for.adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RELEASE OF CITY PROPERTY - LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CROCKER & CROWELLS FIRST ADDITION CONTINUED TO MAY 6, 1985. Mr. Hoffman recalled that at the last meeting the.Council had con- sidered a request from Jon Otterlei asking that a release be initiated to approve the return of Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the State so that the land could be placed of sale. The property was acquired from the State by the City of Morningside originally for storage of storm .water running off streets in the area and is no longer required for that purpose. As directed by the Council, a letter has been sent to the surrounding neighbors to alert..them that the State will probably put the property up for sale to a private party if the Council releases the lot. Mr. Hoffman said that after further research it appears that there is.one other option available to releasing the lot if -it is no longer used for drainage purposes. That would be for the..City to adopt a.resolution.to retain the lot for open space purposes. He noted that residents of the area were present who wished to have the City retain the lot for open space. Gordon Otterlei, 4328 Mackey Avenue, indicated that he was interested in the release of the lot so that he could acquire it to build a.home for himself on.the property and that the request for release of the lot had been made on his behalf by his father, Jon Otterlei. Attorney Erickson explained that the statute says if the City does not use tax forfeited land for -the original purpose for which the City requested it be conveyed, that the City then shall give it back to the State to be put back on the tax rolls. The statute also states that the City can apply for a change of usage which the State may or may not approve. Speaking in support that the lot be retained for open space were Annette Scherer, 4234 Lynn Avenue, who also read a letter in support of open space from James Harris, 4233 Lynn Avenue; Virginia McWethy, 4231 Oakdale Avenue; Don Giese, 4232 Oakdale Avenue; Linda Maetzold, 4220 Oakdale Avenue and Sandra Mitchell, 4235 Lynn Avenue. Member Bredesen commented that the City has a strategy for open space which does not necessarily include every vacant lot, even though neighbors may wish that it remain undeveloped. After further discussion, Member Bredesen moved that this matter be held over to the May 6, 1985, Council meeting, so that the neighbors will have an opportunity to think about it and to discuss it, and so.that the Council can then decide if it fits the City's open space planning. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 4/15/85 BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Hoffman, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -263, P -14, P -15, AND 85 -3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT. NOS. BA -263, P -14, P -15, AND 85 -3 CONTRACT 485 -3 (ENG) BIDS CLOSE MAY 2, 1985 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, May 2, 1985. The Edina City Council will. meet at 7:00. P.M., Monday May 6, 1985 to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 2065 L /F, Concrete Curb and Gutter 1052 Tons, Bituminous Paving 6075 C /Y, Excavation 1380 S /Y, Sod 1200 S/F Sidewalk 3196 Tons, Cl. 2 Gravel 54 Trees, F & I Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon- showing the.. -work covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be consider- ed unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NOS. 1120 =A3 AND 1121 (CABLE TV); PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT CONCEPT APPROVED. Mr. Rosland advised that Ordinance No.,1120- A3_and:_ No. 1121 have been drafted for adoption by the five cities of the Southwest Sub- urban Cable Commission, after approximately a year of negotiations with the Rogers Cablesystems- Southwest regarding.their request for financial relief. The Commission has recommended to each of its five member cities that the Grantee of their res- pective cable communications franchise be granted certain financial relief upon certain conditions. Those conditions are set out in 1) an amendment to the existing Franchise ordinance, 2) a temporary "Relief Ordinance" and a '.'Performance Agreement ". Also, the Commission and Grantee are to sign two additional agreements -(A) Local Programming Facilities and (b) Local Programming Personnel, further implementing the ordinances and agreement. Mr. Rosland pointed out the major points in each document as follows: Ordinance Amendment - 1) changes name of Grantee, 2) allows 4'/15%85 extension of Franchise term for 4 years if satisfactory new financing is obtained by December 31, 1987, 3) allows the City to waive service to extended areas, 4) allows Grantee to comply with 'liability insurance requirements by use of blanket policies with annual aggregate limitations, and 5) changes the formula for the purchase price of the System. Relief Ordinance - 1) temporary ordinance, expiring not later than March 1, 1992, 2) modifies only specific provisions of the Franchise and only so long as the Relief Ordinance is in effect, 3) only 60% of the franchise fee payable in 1984 will be paid and then only in installments, 4) annual franchise fees payable in 1985 and for the term of the Relief Ordinance also are reduced to 60% of the prior fee, and paid in installments, 5) during the term of the Relief Ordi- nance the Performance Bond in the amount of $300,000 will be dispensed with, and 6) during the term of the Relief Ordinance, Grantee need expend only 1% of its gross revenues for public, governmental and educational access. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the.key elements for financial relief to the Grantee is 1) reduction of the franchise fee from 5% to 3% of gross revenues, and 2) that the Grantee need expend only 1% of its gross revenues for public, governmental and educational access in full satisfaction of its local programming obligations under the Franchise. The City has currently approximately $70,000 /80,000 from franchise fees for cable related activi- ties. The documents provide for a 72 year relief program; should the Grantee reach certain levels of income then the franchise fee goes back to 5 %. After 72 years it automatically goes back to 5% unless another relief package is negotiated. It was noted that the major problem for Rogers Cablesystems is their present bank loan. The negotiating committee has met with the bank representatives regarding renegotia- ing the loan and it is hoped that the loan can be renegotiated. Mr. Rosland stated that the documents have been examined by the cities' attorneys and that approval is recommended. He pointed out that representatives of Rogers Cablesystems- Southwest were present as well as Ralph Campbell, Commission Administrator, to answer any questions. City Attorney Erickson pointed out the importance of the condition under the Relief Ordinance that during its term the Performance Bond will be dispensed with until the City requires that it be provided. Mr. Erickson explained that the exact language of the agreements has not yet been agreed upon by the Grantee and the cities. However..to expedite the process of adopting the ordinances and authorizing execution and delivery of the agreements, the following procedure is" recommended: 1) have First Reading of the two ordinances,.and concept approval of the agreements, and 2) at the Second Reading of the ordinances, the agreements will be available for review and reaction by the City. If approved, the ordinances can be given final reading, and execution and delivery of the agreements can be authorized. Member Turner asked what the impact would be as a result of the reduced franchise fees to Edina. Mr. Rosland responded that we would receive approximately $25,000/30,000 for the City's cable activities, such as the Edina Police Report program. No other comment being heard, Member Turner offered Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120 TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE: TO EXTEND THE FRANCHISE TERM: TO CHANGE THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: AND TO CHANGE THE COMPUTATION OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE PAID BY CITY UPON EXPIRATION OF THE FRANCHISE THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraphs J and S of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: J. "Grantee" is Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited Partnership, a Minn- esota limited partnership with Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as the General Partner. S. "SWSCC" shall mean the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. SECTION 2. That Article II, Section 4 of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: This Franchise shall commence upon acceptance by Grantee and shall expire on December 31, 1995. Provided, however, that if by December 31, 1987, Grantee (i) is able to close on, and have funded, without conditions, new long term financing, reasonably satisfactory to City, to replace the obligation evidenced by loan docu- ments dated April 1, 1982, from Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada, in the original principal amount of Eighteen Million and No /100 Dollars ($18,000,000.00) (the "Existing Indebtedness "), and (ii) gives written notice of such new financing to City with written evidence thereof reasonably acceptable to City, then, upon the occurrence of (i) and (ii) by December 31, 1987, the term of this Franchise shall be extended by four (4) years, from December 31, 1995 to December 31, 1999, subject, however, to approval of such extension by the Board, if required, and the FCC, if required, and any other governmental body having juris- diction over the matter, if required. If any such approvals are required, City and Grantee agree to cooperate in obtaining such approvals. If any such approvals are required, and are not obtained, for any reason, then the four (4) year extension shall not become effective. If such extension becomes effective, Grantee and City shall sign and deliver an agreement evidencing such extension, but such extention shall be effective even without such additional agreement. / 3C_-) 4/15/85 SECTION 3. That Article V, Section 2 of said Ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new Paragraph F as follows: F. City may waive, at any time and from time to time, for good cause shown, by Council resolution, compliance by Grantee with any or all of the requirements imposed on Grantee by this Section 2 relative to providing service to any extended area or areas. SECTION 4. That Article VIII, Section 2, Paragraph A, subparagraph (4) of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: (4) Any and all claims which Grantee may now or hereafter have or claim to have against City, its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents, employees or officials, due to or arising out of, damage to any of Grantee's property or equipment, including, without limitation, resulting - or..consequential loss.of income,.injury to reputation, or any other resulting or consequential damages of any kind, caused by or resulting from acts or omissions of City or any of its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents, employees or officials. SECTION 5. That Article VIII, Section 3, Paragraph A of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: A. Grantee shall maintain liability insurance covering its obligations of indemnification provided for in, or as a result of the exercise of, this Franchise (except, however, for the indemnifications in subparagraph (3) of Article VIII, Section 2, Paragraph A of this Franchise) covering both the City and Grantee and shall maintain said insurance during the term of this Franchise in the minimum of: 1. $500,000.00 for property damage to any one person; 2. $2,000,000.00 for property damage in any one act or occurence; 3. $1,000,000.00 for personal injury to any one person; and 4. $2,000,000.00 for personal injury in any one act or occurence. The foregoing insurance may be provided by means of a blanket liability insur- ancy policy or policies with an annual aggregate limitation of not less than $262000,000.00. SECTION 6. That Article VIII, Section 3, Paragraph E of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: E. All insurance policies maintained pursuant to this Franchise shall contain the following endorsements and provisions: (i) It is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not be cancelled nor the intention not to renew be stated until 60 days after receipt to City, by registered mail, of written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew. (ii) A waiver of subrogation, in form and substance acceptable to City, as to any and all claims against the City which are waived hereunder by Grantee or as to which Grantee has agreed hereunder to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, boards, commissioners, servants, officials, agents and employees. (iii) A provision that if the aggregate insurance coverage of the blanket policies provided by Grantee is'ever reduced below $10,000,000.00, then notice of such fact shall promptly be given to City by Grantee or Grantee's insurance agent and additional liability coverage shall immediately be purchased by Grantee so as to restore the annual aggregate to the minimum amount then required under this Franchise. SECTION 7. That Article XI, Section 2, Paragraph C of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: C. The purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon revocation or termination of the Franchise shall be the cost less depreciation (as shown on the books and records of Grantee) or the fair market value, whichever is less, and goodwill shall not be included in the purchase price of the System. However, if this Franchise expires (and is not revoked or terminated) and if Grantee had complied with the requirements of Article II, Section 4 of this Franchise, and all required approvals are obtained, so that the Franchise term is extended for an additional four (4) years pursuant to said Section 4, then the purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon expiration of this Franchise shall be the fair _.. market value of the System determined on the basis of the System valued as a going concern but with no value given or allocated to this Franchise itself. If the City and Grantee cannot agree on the purchase price, it shall be determined by arbitration pursuant to the provisons of this Section 2. SECTION 8. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with the provisions of Article XIV of said Ordinance, including delivery to the City of the acceptance, opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said Article XIV. SECTION 9. Subject to the provisions of Section 8 hereof, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication. Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 4/15/85 Member Turner introduced Ordinance No. 1121 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1121 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE, PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This ordinance shall be known as the "CATV Relief Ordinance." SECTION 2. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE. The City has granted a cable television franchise through the adoption of city ordinance code sections No. 1120 , the Cable Communications Ordinance (hereinafter called the ( "Franchise "). The cities of Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield (the "Other Cities ") have adopted similar ordinances, all with the same franchise Grantee. Through the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC "), a joint powers organization, the City and the Other Cities have undertaken to super- vise Grantee's compliance with these ordinances. Since the adoption of the Franchise Grantee has constructed and is operating a cable communications system in City and the Other Cities. Grantee has approached the City indicating that it is experiencing serious financial difficulties and would be unable to pay the franchise fee due and payable on November 1, 1984. Grantee requested a temporary reduction of its Franchise obligations to allow for its finan- cial recovery. City authorized the SWSCC to review Grantee's request and make recommendations for an appropriate response. SWSCC retained a financial consultant to assist in analyzing Grantee's financial condition, held several public meetings, and conducted a thorough review of Grantee's request. SWSCC determined that Grantee is exper- iencing serious financial difficulties caused by such adverse factors as higher than anticipated construction and operating costs, lower than projected market penetration, inability to obtain long -term financing at projected rates and other industry, economic and technological changes. SWSCC also concluded that Grantee cannot secure needed refinancing of its long -term debt, cannot continue to provide the present level of service and cannot become an economically viable enterprise unless the City grants a period of relief from some of the requirements of the Franchise. SWSCC recommends that the City grant temporary amendments to the Franchise, reducing the franchise fee payable now and in the future, eliminating the required performance bond, and modifying the provisions for local programming. In return, Grantee would execute a Performance Agreement providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other matters related to Grantee's requested relief. The City has reviewed SWSCC's recommendations and has considered the option of requiring full payment of the past due franchise fee through use of Grantee's letter of credit, performance bond, and parent company performance guarantees. Grantee represents, however, that if the City and the Other Cities -seek payment of past due franchise fees through resort to such securities, this would only make it more difficult for Grantee to solve its financial problems and would be counterproduct- ive to any effort to provide relief to Grantee. In adopting this ordinance the City relies upon the representations of Grantee and seeks to provide a means by which the public can continue to receive approximately the same level of service while affording Grantee a reasonable opportunity for financial recovery. The ultimate purpose of this ordinance is to secure, at a later time during the Franchise term, the full public benefits provided for in the Franchise. SECTION 3. RELATIONSHIP TO CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE. This ordinance does not permanently amend any provision of the Cable Communi- cations Ordinance-(the "Franchise ") but provides that certain provisions of that ordinance are modified for a period of time as provided in this Relief Ordinance. Except as expressly modified in this ordinance, the provisions of the Franchise remain in full force and effect. SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS. Subdivision 1. The definitions in the Franchise also apply to this ordinance. Subd. 2. In addition, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given them: (1) "Existing indebtedness" means an $18,000,000 loan made to Grantee by Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada under loan documents dated April 1, 1982. (2) "Franchise" means the Cable Communications Ordinance as now or hereafter amended. (3) "Local Programming Obligations" means, for the purpose of this ordinance, Grantee's obligations under the Franchise and the offering for cablecast access, community access and local origination programming. (4) "Performance Agreement" means a contractual agreement between Grantee, City and SWSCC providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other t� 4/15/85 matters related to Grantee's requested relief. SECTION 5. RELIEF GRANTED. While this ordinance is in effect the obligations of Grantee are modified to the extent provided in this section. Subdivision 1. Franchise Fees - Percentage. Commencing with Grantee's fiscal year 1985 the annual franchise fee is reduced from 5% of Gross Revenues to 3 %. Such annual fees shall be paid to City in equal quarterly payments on or before the first day of each of the months of November, February, May and August next following the end of Grantee's fiscal year. If this ordinance terminates during any of Grantee's fiscal years, the franchise fee shall be restored to the rate of 5% of Gross Revenues at the end of the calendar month in which termination occurs. The restored rate of 5% and the reduced rate of 3% shall be applied respectively to the Gross Revenues collected only in the months during which each rate was in effect. The fees accruing at the restored rate shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the Franchise. The fees accruing at the reduced rate shall be paid in equal quarterly install- ments in accordance with the terms of this ordinance. Subd. 2. Past Due Franchise Fees. The 1984 franchise fee in the amount of $ payable on or before November 1, 1984 shall be deemed fully dis- charged and paid if, but only if, Grantee pays the sum of (60 %) to the City, in four equal payments on or before June 1, June 15, August 15 and October 15, 1985. Subd. 3. Letters of Credit. The City Council may by resolution reduce the required amount of the Letter of Credit below $50,000 if in its sole dis- cretion it determines that a lesser amount is reasonable and adequate to protect the public. It may thereafter, by resolution, require the amount of the Letter of Credit to be increased or fully restored to the amount of $50,000. Grantee shall comply with this.requirement within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. 4. Performance Bond. The Grantee may dispense with the $300,000 performance bond required by the Franchise. The City Council may thereafter by resolution require that such bond, or similar bond in a lesser amount, be provided by Grantee. Grantee shall comply with this requirement within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. 5. Local Programming Obligations. Grantee shall expend at least 1% of its annual Gross Revenues each fiscal year in fulfilling its Local Program- ming Obligations under the Franchise for public, governmental, and educational access, but it shall not be obligated to expend more than that amount for such access. That amount shall not include any costs of operation or administration not directly related to the provision of local programming. This expenditure shall be in complete satisfaction of Grantee's total Local Programming Obliga- tions during the period of this ordinance. SECTION 6. AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELIEF ORDINANCE PROVISIONS. The provisions of this ordinance, and the relief herein granted, shall cease to be effective, automatically, upon the occurrence of the earliest of-any of the following events: Subdivision 1. Failure of the Grantee to complete refinancing its Existing Indebtedness by December 31, 1987 in accordance with Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 2. The end of the next month after Grantee has collected cumulative Gross Revenues in the amount of one hundred million dollars as measured from September 1, 1984. The determination of cumulative Gross Revenues shall be based upon audited financial statements for periods for which they are available and upon Grantee's operating reports for periods for which audited statements are not then available. Grantee shall provide City with its financial state- ments and financial operating reports promptly after they are prepared. Subd. 3. March 1, .1992. Subd. 4. Payment,.discharge, or satisfaction of the Existing Indebtedness, except through refinancing as provided in Article II., Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 5. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the indebtedness arising from the refinancing provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 6. Failure of the Grantee to restore or replace the full required amount of the Letter of Credit as provided in Article VIII, Section 4, paragraph H of the Franchise. Subd. 7. Failure of the Grantee to pay the fees as required in Section 5, Subd. 2 of this ordinance. Subd. 8. Failure.of the Grantee to restore, replace or increase either a Letter of Credit or bond within sixty days of written notice by the City, as provided in Section 5, Subdivisions 3 and 4 of this ordinance. Subd. 9. A holding or determination by any court or agency that any term, condition or provision of this Relief Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable, as a result of any action taken by Grantee or anyone acting on Grantee's behalf seeking such determination. 10'Z1 4/15/85 Subd. 10. Sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the System to a person or entity other than a parent, subsidiary, related corporation, affiliated corporation, partner or joint venturer of Grantee or any parent of Grantee. Subd. 11. Termination of `the Franchise. SECTION 7. OTHER TERMINATIONS. This ordinance may also be terminated for cause, under the same procedures for termination as are contained in the Franchise, for the following reasons; Subdivision 1. All grounds for termination provided in the Franchise, except to the extent that Grantee's performance obligations are modified in this ordinance. Subd. 2. The purchase by Grantee, its general partner, or any parent, subsid- iary, affiliate or other related corporation of Grantee or its general partner, of a cable communications system or any part thereof or interest therein, located within the seven - county metropolitan area as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.121, Subd. 2. For this purpose the definition of a cable communications system shall be as that term is currently defined by the Board. Such a purchase shall not be grounds for termination of this ordinance, however, if the - Grantee demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the purchase (1) will not impair the operating cash flow or financial position of Grantee and (2) will involve independent financing of the purchase without resort to the assets of the System. Subd. 3. Failure of the Grantee to comply with any of the provisions of the Performance Agreement. SECTION 8. REQUESTS FOR FURTHER RELIEF. No request by the Grantee for any further relief from the requirements of the Franchise, including a request for an extension of the term of this ordinance, shall be considered by the City unless that request is made in writing prior to September 1, 1990. The City shall have no obligation whatsoever to consider or grant any such request, and any response to such request shall be at the sole discretion of the City. SECTION 9. ACCEPTANCE OF THIS RELIEF ORDINANCE; PROVIDING OF GUARANTEES. This ordinance shall be accepted by Grantee in accordance with the provisons of Article XIV of the Franchise. This ordinance shall not become effective until Grantee has executed and delivered to the City the written Performance Agreement and attached contractual documents. Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1121.was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Member Turner then moved concept approval of the Performance Agreement to be signed by the City and Grantee and the agreements for Local Programming Facilities and Local Programming Personnel to be signed by the Commission and Grantee. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20 (FEES FOR-ON-SALE LIQUOR AND ON -SALE WINE LICENSE) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that the Council had given First Reading to Ordinance No. 171 -A20 at the meeting of April 1, 1985. The ordinance increases the fee for On -Sale Liquor License and establishes the fee for On -Sale Wine License in accordance with the wine license ordinance. Attorney Erickson called attention to minor changes regarding the fees as they relate to number of seats in restaurants and pointed out that the fee of $50.00 per year for Manager's License should be included in the ordinance. There being no further comment, Member Kelly introduced the revised Ordinance No. 171 -A20 for Second Reading and moved its adoption as follows: - - ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND TO ESTABLISH FEE FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number of Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows: ORD. SEC. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 902 10 Intoxicating liquor $1,400.00 per year 36b on -sale license Sec. 2. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: 1-3y ORD. SEC. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE 902 38(b) On -sale wine license 4/15/85 FEE NO. Per year, restaurants with 36g 50 seats or fewer $550.00 51 - 100 seats, inclusive 600.00 101 - 150 seats, inclusive 650.00 Over 150 seats 700.00 902 42(e) Manager's license $50.00 per year I 36h Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. PRELININARY APPROVAL GRANTED FOR $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS. The Mayor stated that this was the time and place fixed by this Council for a public hearing on the proposal that the City undertake and finance a project (the Project) on behalf of Fairview Community Hospitals, a Minnesota non - profit corporation (Fairview) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474. The City Clerk.presented affidavits showing publication of the notice of public hearing at least once not less than 15 nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing, in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, and in the Minneapolis Star and Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation throughout the City. The affidavits were examined, found to be satisfactory and ordered placed.on file with the City Clerk. The Mayor then opened the meeting for the public hearing on the proposal to under- take and finance the Project on behalf of Fairview. The purpose of the hearing was explained, the nature of the Project and of the proposed revenue bonds was discussed, the draft copy of the Application to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development with draft copies of all attachments and exhibits were available, and all persons present who desired to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their view with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, in response to which the following persons either appeared, were recognized and made statements, or filed written comments with the City Clerk before the date set for the hearing, summaries of which appear opposite their respective names: Name of Speaker Summary of Views None N/A After all persons who wished to do so had stated or filed their views on the proposal, the Mayor declared the public hearing to be closed. After some dis- cussion, Member Bredesen moved for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT AND ITS FINANCING UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ACT (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS PROJECT); REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL; AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the Municipality), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findings 1.1. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed project under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474 (the Act), consisting of the remodeling of certain areas of Fairview - Southdale Hospital (the Hospital) located within the Municipality at 6401 France Avenue South and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment in the Hospital by Fairview Community Hospitals, a Minnesota non - profit corporation (Fairview) and the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness of Fairview incurred in the acquisition or betterment of the Hospital (the Project). 1.2. At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on April 15, 1985, in accordance with the Act on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the Project and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing. Based on the public hearing, such written comments (if any) and such other.facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant, this Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: (a) The welfare of the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attract- ion, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted lands and areas of chronic unemployment, and the State of Minnesota has encouraged local government units to act to prevent such economic deterioration. (b) Other factors necessitating such active promotion and development of 4/1$/85 industry and commerce within the Municipality are the need to provide quality medical care to residents of the Municipality and surrounding areas and the need for more intensive development and use of land within the Municipality. (c) The Project would further the general purposes contemplated and described in Section 474.01 of the Act. (d) This Council has been advised by representatives of Fairview, that conventional, commercial financing to pay the cost of the Project is available only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic feasibility of undertaking the Project would be significantly reduced and would result in higher patient and third party payor charges, but that with the aid of municipal borrowing, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, will materially increase the economic feasibility of the Project, will reduce patient charges and third party payor costs, and will constitute a significant inducement to Fairview to undertake the Project. (e) This Council has also been advised by representatives of Fairview that on the basis of their discussions with potential buyers of tax - exempt bonds, revenue bonds of the Municipality (which may be in the form of a commercial development revenue note or notes) could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. (f) The Municipality is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue bonds to finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services, including without limitation, hospitals, nursing homes and related medical facilities, such as Fairview, and the issuance of the bonds by the Municipality would be a substantial inducement to Fairview to undertake the Project. SECTION 2 Determination to Proceed with the Project and its Financing 2.1. On the basis of the information given the Municipality to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the Municipality to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance the Project in the maximum aggregate face amount of $12,000,000. 2.2. It is hereby determined to proceed with the Project and its financing and this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the Municipality issue its revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the Municipality or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue bonds, and issuance of such revenue bonds shall be sub - ject to final approval by the City Council of the Municipality. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Develop - ment, shall be subject to such further conditions as the Municipality may specify and shall be subject to final approval of the issuance of such revenue bonds by the City Council of the Municipality. The revenue bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Munici- pality, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the Municipality within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation. 2.3. The Application to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Develop- ment, with attachments, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said documents on behalf of the Municipality. 2.4. In accordance with Section 474.10, Subdivision 7a of the Act, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be sub- mitted to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development for approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the Municipality are hereby authorized and directed to provide the Department with any preliminary information needed for this purpose. The City Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate to the Project, if approved by the Department and if issuance of such revenue bonds is given final approval by this City Council. SECTION 3 General 3.1. If the bonds are issued and sold, the'Municipality will enter into a lease, sale or loan agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the Revenue Agreement) with Fairview. The lease rentals, installment sale payments, loan payments or other amounts payable by Fairview to the Municipality under the Revenue Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest and redemption premium, if any, on, the bonds as and when the same shall become due and payable. 3.2. Fairview has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with the Project, whether or not the Project is carried to completion, and whether or not approved by the /3fln I 4/15/85 Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development, and whether or not the Municipality by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by.Fairview upon request. 3.3. The Mayor and City Manager are directed, if the bonds are issued and sold, thereafter to comply with the provisions of Section 474.01, Subdivisions 8 and 11 of the Act. Adopted this 15th day of April, 1985. Attest: Mayor City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Kelly and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded.by Member Kelly for.payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 4/15/85: General Fund $98,679.48, Art Center $1,603.03, Swimming Pool Fund $9,900.00, Golf Course. Fund $8,481.31, Recreation Center Fund $3,235.68, Gun Range Fund $656.59, Water Fund $4,558.06, Utility Fund $12,407.65, Liquor Dispensary Fund $69,120.41, Construction Fund $720.00, Total $209,362.21; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 3/31/85: General Fund $149,179.89, Park Fund $4,854.85, Art Center $366.10, Golf Course Fund $2,373.96, Recreation Center Fund $5,773.99, Gun Range Fund $4.50, Utility Fund $7,536.57, Liquor Dispensary Fund $247,684.90, Total $417,774.76. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:23 p.m. 5 City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 1, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. EDINA MIDGET WHITE A HOCKEY TEAM COMMENDED. Mayor Courtney read the following reso- lution of commendation for the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team, which was adopted unanimously: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION - EDINA MIDGET WHITE A HOCKEY TEAM WHEREAS, Edina's long - standing superiority in youth hockey was again asserted with the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team capturing the r1AHA State 1,Iidget Hockey Championship; and WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets completed a successful season with a record of 34 wins, 4 losses and 4 ties; and WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets was the runner -up team in the International Silver Stick Tournament at Sarnia, Ontario, being the first time an American team went to the finals; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, on behalf of the citizenry as a whole, that the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team be publicly commended for their outstanding accomplishments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of the'City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the team: Sean Collins, Matt Crowley, Kirk Dulac, Doug Evenson, Mark Feese, Jim Genung, Ted Hoffman, Erik Johnson, Sean Kearney, Pat McCarthy, John McCoy, Rob .Morris, Doug Mostrom, Peter Perry, Dan Peterson, Jim Turner and Todd Willson, to Coaches Hal Tearse and John Turner and to Team Managers. Jack Genung and Jerry Kearney. ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1985. Copies of the resolution were then presented personally to the team captains and each member of the team who was present and to the coaches. Member Turner commented that this was an exceptional fine group of young men who are a credit to Edina on . and off the ice and that they and their parents join in thanking the Edina Hockey Association and Mr. Kojetin and his staff in making these programs possible. MARK BERNHARDSON COMMENDED FOR OUTSTANDING JOB AS ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland advised that Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager, has tendered his resignation and has accepted the position of City Administrator in Orono, Minnesota. He recalled that Mr. Bernhardson came to the City in July of 1977 and has been his assistant since he was appointed as City Manager in October of that year. Mr. Rosland stated that Mr. Bernhardson has been a very helpful and strong Assistant Manager, and that although the.City staff was sorry to see him,go,.that we are proud of his accomplish- ments and thank him for his dedicated service to the City. Mr. Rosland presented him with a silver pen bearing the City logo and wished him well in his new position. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Courtney expressed their regrets in his leaving and also extended their wishes for success in the future. MINUTES of the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRD -3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES PROPERTY GRANTED FIRST READING (ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A3). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen, Planner, recalled that the public hearing.on_ the Zoning - Change from_R- 1 .to -PRD -3 for -the Brutger Companies property, generally located west.of..Cahill Road and..south.of..Dewey Hill Road, had been continued.from the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985. The request for rezoning had been heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on January 2 and January 30, 1985. The site is abutted by Dewey Hill Condominiums on the north and west and by Windwood Condominiums directly to the south. Mr. Larsen stated that according to the City's Comprehensive Plan of 1980 the site is desig- nated as suitable for medium density residential and this is in the range of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proponent, Brutger Companies, is requesting a rezoning from the existing R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Resi- dential District and have submitted a site plan illustrating.26_townhouse units and 24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven individual buildings. Each individual building would contain either 4, 6 or 8 units. This would result in an overall density for the site of 9.73 dwelling units per acre on the 5.14 acre I 0 -0 4/1/85 site. The plan proposes to mix traditional townhouse style of units (living space -for one family on two different floors) with a condominium style unit where all the living space will be on one floor. Individual units, whether townhouse or condominium, will contain between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet of living area. The townhouse units will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit and the condo - minium units will provide parking at a ratio of 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit. All garages proposed by the site plan are attached. In addition to the surface parking spaces that would be provided in front of each garage stall, there are 24 surface parking spaces scattered thoughout the site. All buildings are 2 -story in design and the exterior treatment would be brick and cedar siding with asphalt shingles. Mr. Larsen advised that the staff report of January 30 recommended approval of the project. However, by a 6 to 3 vote the Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed plan. He noted that Steve Wilson of the Brutger Companies was present .to explain the proposed project further. Mr. Wilson stated that the Brutger Com- panies is a development corporation specializing in multi - family housing. He then outlined some of the steps they had taken in the selection of this type of project as.the best and highest use for the subject property. He pointed out that the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Housing Element, identifies a second theme as the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choicer available in the City and to offer...a.wide range of market rate residential housing choices. Mr. Wilson stated that they had worked closely with City staff to meet the goal under the Plan's Land Use Element of encouraging excellence in site plan- ing, building materials and design. The Plan also states that vacant.lands.in the Cahill and 70th Street area are generally characterized by severe environmental limitations such as slopes or poor soils and multiple residential or clustered housing presents the most logical means of land utilization. Mr. Wilson pointed out that the proposed project uses the cluster housing concept to utilize the existing topography. They also-looked-at-the City's 1980 Land Use Plan which shows two primary areas within the City that have a medium density land use designation. Within those areas they had found a mixture of apartments, townhouses and condo - miums projects which had been constructed and had selected the clustered housing concept which has been well received in the housing market. Mr. Wilson added that they had considered the requirements established by the Zoning Ordinance as to density and setbacks and that the proposed project is well within those guidelines. In summary he stated that the project will be highly marketable, that it is a quality product and will have amenities that are appealing to the people who are going to buy the units. Tom Hunt, Carlson..Mjorud Architecture, architect for the project, then outlined the architectural elements of the project: 1) exterior to be of brick and cedar, compatible ..with the.surrounding area, 2) buildings would be sited to create a park -like setting, 3) the footprint of the buildings would pro- vide interest by use of jogs, 4) the buildings would have an animated roofscape, and 5) landscaping would include flowering trees /shrubs to add color and interest, with the vegetation to interface with surrounding property. Mr. Wilson then responded to general questions from the audience. He clarified that the units will be owner occupied, not rental, and will be designed for several types of marketing; that the one - level, first floor -units will be.geared - primarily for the elderly,...the_ one- level,.second floor.units..would: appeal to.the young professionals, and the 2 -story townhouse units would appeal to the young professional couples but will not necessarily be geared to families; and that the questions of pets would be a decision to be made by the association which will be formed. He added that the setbacks requirements are 20 foot sideyard.,.35 foot rear yard and 35 foot front yard. Buildings will be sited at angles to eliminate a tunnel look. City ordi- nance requires that garbage cans.must be-in an-enclosure or building and will not be seen from surrounding properties. The units are proposed to be priced from a minimum of $95,000/100,000 to a maximum of $135,000/140,000. Bob Gunderson, 6550 York Avenue, addressed some of the issues that were raised at the Planning Commission meeting with regard to density, integrity of neighborhood, quality of structure, design and landscaping. In summary,-he stated that the site has unique possibilities and that the proposed development was designed for this particular site to meet the demand and needs of people who are looking to shift residences or move into Edina; that'the proposed project responds to the Comprehensive Plan, meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements and follows the precedent established by other approved developments in Edina. Mr. Wilson then responded to general ques- tions of the Council regarding comparision of price range of the proposed units with adjacent.properties, exterior materials, windows, and lot coverage. Melvin Gittleman stated he was the developer of Dewey Hill Condomiums, East and West and of the proposed South building. He stated that he objected to the proposed develop- ment for these reasons: 1) the development will be out of scale to the surround- ing area because the site has existing three -story buildings on three sides, 2) the density is too high, 3) lot coverage not compatible with adjacent develop- ments. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Homeowners Association, advised that 30% of the members of the Association are opposed to the proposed development and that at its February meeting Windwood's.Board of Directors had voted unanimously 1 0\ 4/1/.85 to go on record in opposition. He summarized the concerns of the Windwood resi- dents as follows: 1) the ratio of "covered" land to green area is too high, 2) increased traffic in the area, 3) detrimental effect to Windwood residents by addition.of a two -story structure so close to the property line, 4) development would not be in keeping with "flavor" of neighborhood, and 5) concern for wildlife of the area. Also speaking in opposition to the proposed development were Alvyn Pope, 5601 Dewey Hill Road 4210- Harley Peet, 5501 Dewey Hill Road #324; William Harrison, 7510 Cahill Road, and Albert Levin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A3 as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) final zoning is conditioned on final plat, 2) developer's agreement, 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) approval of landscaping plan. Member Turner stated she supported the rezoning because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan both in terms of widening the range of housing choices and the medium density land use designation and that it meets the requirements of PRD -3 zoning. She pointed out two concerns that should be addressed before Second Reading: 1) landscaping to protect surrounding properties and 2) concern for increased traffic. Motion for granting First Reading was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Richards stated he would support the motion if the proposed development were reduced in density not to exceed 44 units total for the site. Member Bredesen commented that he would support an effort to reduce the density to-44 units but that his biggest concern was that a landscaping plan should be submitted that would show mature plantings and a heavily landscaped site. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards First Reading granted. ORDINANCE NO. 82-5-A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: . Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -3) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet of the North 30 acres of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING FOR WOODHAVEN GRANTED FIRST READ- ING (ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Gordon Hughes, City Planner, presented the request for zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Residence District for Woodhaven, generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue. The subject property measures 32,500 square feet in area and is composed of three developed single family lots. He recalled that Council had approved a rezoning to PRD -3 District for this property on March 19, 1984, for continuation of a townhouse project that had started at the corner of Summit Avenue and Interlachen Blvd. Five of the units were constructed and a rezoning was approved for 8 more units to be constructed on the subject property. This project did not receive a final plat approval although it was rezoned and construction has not and apparently will not commence. Mr. Hughes stated that the property has now been optioned by Westminster Corporation for the purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster, who operates under the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis /St. Paul, is working with a group of Edina churches who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. It will be funded by the HUD 202 Program and the project will be identical to South Haven which was recently constructed at Parklawn and York Avenues. If the project receives preliminary approval, an application will be submitted to HUD to finance the project. Final approval would not be sought until a financing commitment is achieved. The request is for construction of a three -story building with 28 senior citizen units and one caretaker unit. As with the previous townhouse plan, it is proposed that Summit Avenue be vacated and the right of way be included within the site. In conformance with the traffic plan that was submitted by BRW for the Grandview area, access to the site will be maintained both to Interlachen Boulevard as well as Vernon Avenue to alleviate the site distance problems associated with the Summit and Interlachen intersection. Mr. Hughes pointed out that from the Zoning Ordinance standpoint, the project generally complies but the following deficiencies should be noted: Required Proposed .Lot Area for 29 dwelling units 33,750 sq.ft. 32,500 Enclosed parking 8 spaces 7 spaces Exposed parking 15 spaces 14 spaces Parking setbacks 10 feet 5 feet /oa 4/1/85 Building height was a concern expressed by property owners to the west in regard to the prior townhouse plan. The proposed building is a full three stores in height rather than two and one -half stories as were the townhouses. Although a final grading plan..has not been submitted, the first floor elevation of the proposed building will be lower than the townhouses that were proposed. As a result, it appears that the overall height.of the proposed building is within..2 -3 feet of the townhouses that were approved for the site. The rezoning request was heard by the Community Develop- ment and Planning Commission at its February 27, 1985 meeting. The Commission recommended preliminary rezoning approval, subject to the following: 1) vacation of Summit Avenue, 2) acceptable overall development plans, 3) final platting, 4) sub - division dedication, 5) developer's agreement, and 6) redevelopment contract with the Edina HRA. Mr. Hughes indicated that Larry Laukka, coordinator for the Edina Ministerial Association in connection with the project, was present. Mr. Laukka introduced John Rocheford, Community.Development Corporation, as the developer for the project; Jan Blessner, Trossen /Wright Architects, as the architect; and Jim Curry, lay committee member. Mr. Laukka indicated that the Edina churches involved in the project will raise approximately $75,000 towards the funding. Mr. Curry advised that Community Development Corporation operate 1,600 units in 25 non - profit corporations and have a lot of experience with projects of this type. He noted that there were few sites left in Edina for elderly housing and that the Ministerial Association was excited for such an opportunity, explaining that the price was right in addition to the location. Mr. Rocheford explained that Westminster Corporation is the management subsidiary of Community Development Corporation. He advised that he has met with the neighbors regarding their concerns: 1) landscaping, and 2) the height of the building. He stated that if funding is approved through the HUD 202 Program the issue of landscaping will be addressed in more detail and plans will be brought before the Council. Regarding building height, he pointed out that the roof line of the proposed building will be two feet higher than what the townhouses proposed for roof line which in addition proposed several fireplaces above the roof line. Member Richards said he was concerned about the density and building coverage for the site. Mr. Rocheford and Mr. Curry explained that the requirements for funding through the HUD 202 Program are very restrictive. Units cannot-be larger than 540 sq..ft.. and. all units must be one bedroom except for the caretaker unit. The occupant elegibility is a combination of asset /income not to exceed $11,500 per year, and occupants receive subsidized rent. Experience with projects of this type has shown that less than one -third of the residents actually own a car. HUD also requires that the project must be close to shopping and service centers and the subject property is unique in that it meets those stringent requirements. Mr. Laukka commented that the proposed site would function with 32 units but that the project was scaled down to a total of 29 units, that they had looked at the land use issue and were of the opinion that this site would not be thwarted because of 29 units, nor would it set a precedent for future developments. Member Turner asked if a sidewalk would be provided down to Vernon Avenue and noted that there were no side- walks on Vernon. Ms. Blessner responded that the plans showed a sidewalk all the way from the front door, with no steps. Engineer Hoffman stated that when changes are made as recommended in the Grandview traffic study that sidewalks could be constructed at that time and that 3 traffic signals are proposed for that area. Mr. Hoffman clarified that access to the building will be maintained both to Inter- lachen Boulevard and to Vernon Avenue, with one restriction that no left turn will be allowed onto Interlachen Boulevard because of the sight distance. There being no further comments, Member Kelly introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A6 for First Reading, subject to the following conditions: 1) vacation of Summit Avenue, 2) acceptable overall development plans, 3) final platting, 4) subdivision dedication, 5) deve- loper's agreement, and 6) redevelopment contract with the Edina HRA: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A6 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PSR -4) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Senior Residence District (Sub- District PSR -4) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: "Lot 3, Block 5, Grandview Heights; Lot 4, Block 4, Grandview Heights; Lot 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights and adjacent street right of way." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for granting First Reading was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR INTERLACHEN HEIGHTS. Affidavits of Notice were pre- sented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Interlachen Heights, generally located \ -wn 4,/1/85 . west of Ridge Road and north and south of Interlachen Boulevard. The subject property measures 12.75 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. An existing dwelling is located in the north central portion of the site. The request that was hedid by the Community Development and Planning Commission on February 27, 1985, proposed 20 R -1 lots with Lot 7 of the proposed plat being retained for the existing home. The proposed lots range from 17,500 square feet to 34,900 square feet with an average of 23,000 square feet. The plat proposes the westerly extension of Interlachen Boulevard to a temporary cul -de -sac and the northerly extension to Interlachen of Green Farms. Road as was proposed in the preliminary plat of Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition which was approved several years ago. The area north of Interlachen Boulevard is proposed to be served by two cul -de -sacs rather than a through street due to dimensional problems as well as undesirable effects on the existing home. Both Interlachen and Green Farms are proposed to terminate with temporary cul -de -sacs pending development of pro- perties to the south and west. After the Planning Commission meeting, the owner submitted a slightly revised plat in response to a criticism of the staff that the side lot lines of Lot 3, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 1, should be oriented more radially with the curve of Green Farms Road to provide more logical lot shapes. The revised plat provided for the realignment.of those side lot lines and the owner also found it feasible to add one more lot increasing the number of lots in the plat to 21 The Planning Commission agreed with the proposed plat and the roadway..plan.that proposed to terminate Interlachen-in a cul -de -sac at this time. Mr. Hughes called the Council's attention to an issue mentioned in the staff report concerning subdivision dedication. The subject property does adjoins Van Valkenburg Park on its west side. The City could require a land dedication along the west side to expand the park. The issue was referred to the Edina Park Board at its meeting of March 12 and it was their view that in this case a cash dedication should be required instead of a land dedication. It was the feeling that the final design and location of improvements to Van Valkenburg Park have been set, that the additional land would not be beneficial to the park and adequate buffering would exist without the land dedication. Staff would recommend preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1) developer's agreement, 2) revision of street grades prior to final plat, 3) cash subdivision dedication and 4) that Lot 4 and 5, Block.2, be retained as an outlot. The low.lying outlot would serve as a temporary.storm water holding pond until a storm sewer can be extended to the south. No further comment being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR INTERLACHEN HEIGHTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled " Interlachen Heights ", platted by Charles Loufek and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 1, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the request for division of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition, located at 4233 -35 Valley View Road. The applicant requests a party -wall division of an existing two - family dwelling. The applicant has applied for and received a waiver of the City's requirement for separate utility connections. Staff would recommend approval. No objection being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: - RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition, and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the.subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Southerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition which lies South of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant 36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 2, distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof, and Northerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition which lies North of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant 36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the Easterly line of said Lot 2, Distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the 0 1_/ 4/1/85 Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET FOR YEAR XI APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented a proposed budget for Year XI of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, advising that only one public hearing is required prior to submission of the application to Hennepin County. Urban Hennepin County has been given a planning allocation of $3,101,000 by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Year XI of the program. Edina's share of $167,005 represents a decrease of $2,500 from the previous year. With the exception of the proposed amount for removal of slum and blight conditions, all projects are a continuation of those in existence for the last several years. Mr. Larsen stated that Thomas Esser, Executive Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council, has requested that the City continue the same level of support from the CDBG Program for their H.O.M.E. program. Removal of Slum and Blight Conditions, in the amount of $108,205, is proposed as a new project for Year XI. The project would be targeted to redevelop- ment activities in the Grandview Area Tax Increment District. The funds would most likely be used to assist the redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel site, but may be used on other redevelopment activities in the District. Staff would recommend approval of the proposed budget and authorization for its submittal to Hennepin County. No comments or objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR YEAR XI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Deve- lopment Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds was developed consistent with program rules: Activity Budget Amount Removal of Slum & Blight Conditions $108,205 Rehabilitation of Private Property 20,000 Public Services 8,800 Removal of Architectural Barriers 10,000 Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Development 10,000 Non - Profit Housing Sponsor 10,000 $167,005 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council approves the proposed use of Year XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting April 15, 1985, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Preliminary Plat - Willian C. Hansen Addition - Generally located south of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive. 2) Final Development. Plan - PRD -3 Planned Residential District and Preliminary Plat - Edina Highpointe II - Generally located west of Cahill Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 4/1/85 PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY CONTINUED TO APRIL 15, 1985. As recommended, Member Richard's motion was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on vacation of portion of Lincoln Drive right of way to the Council Meeting of April 15, 1985. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BRAEMAR MAINTENANCE BUILDING. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for construction of the Braemar Maintenance Building at Braemar Golf Course, showing Keho Construction at $194,700, Phillips Klein Company at $195,700, Fullerton Lumber at $197,500, Veit Construction at $201,593, Sunway Homes at $201,900, Rocon Construction at $202,207, Dean & Associates at $209,600 and Olson Concrete Company at $224,400. Motion of Member Richard was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Keho Construction, at $194,700. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF WELL #9. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for redevelopment of Well #9, showing Bergerson Caswell at $30,223.00, Keys Well Drilling Company at $37,590.00, E. H. Renner & Sons at $43,603.00 and Layne Minnesota at $57,860.00. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to low bidder, Bergerson Caswell, Inc., at $30,223.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. EXPENDITURE APPROVED FOR EMERGENCY FILTER REPAIR OF WELL #2 (WOODDALE). Mr. Rosland advised the Council that emergency filter repairs are being made for Well #2 on Wood - dale and that the cost is estimated at $15,000 to $20,000. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly, authorizing the necessary expenditure of.funds for the. ,. emer.gency.repairs to the well. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR SAND, ROCK AND BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. Mr. Rosland presented tabula- tion of bids for Concrete Sand (delivered) showing Prior Lake Aggregate recommended low bidder at $2.80 per ton; Hassen Sand & Gravel and Sa -ag both at $2.90; Barton Sand & Gravel at $3.15; Northwestern Aggregate at $3.54; and Wm. Mueller & Sons at $4.95. Bids for Buck Shot (delivered) showing Hassen Sand & Gravel recommended low bidder at $5.60 per ton; Sa -ag at $5.90; Northwestern Aggregate at $7.24; and Barton Sand & Gravel at $8.55. Bids for Gravel Base (delivered) showing Barton Sand & Gravel recommended low bidder at $3.90-per ton; Sa -ag at $4.05; Hassen.Sand & Gravel at $4.10;--Bury & Carlson at $4.25; Prior Lake Aggregate at $4.50; Midwest. Asphalt Corp. at $4.95; Northwestern Aggregate at $4.99; and Wm. Mueller & Sons at $5.65. Bids for Limestone (delivered) showing Ed Kraemer & Sons recommended low bidder at P4.28 per ton; Bryan Rock Products at $5.09; Barton Sand & Gravel at $5.10, Midwest Asphalt Company at $5.35; and'Hassen Sand & Gravel at $6.40. Bids for Seal -Coat Chips (delivered) showing T.C.I. Trap -Rock recommended low bidder at $12.19 per ton and Hassen Sand & Gravel at $13.50. Bids for Ready Mix Bituminous #2331 (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recommended bidder at $19.85 per ton and Midwest Asphalt Corp. recommended alternate bidder at $19.95 based on shortest pick -up distance; Commercial Asphalt at $18.40; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.00. Bids for Ready Mix Bituminous 42331 Fine (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recommended bidder at $21.10 per ton and Midwest Asphalt Corp. recommended alternate bidder at $21.50 based on shortest pick -up distance; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.00; and Commercial Asphalt at $20.95. Bids for Ready Mix Bituminous 42341 (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recom- mended bidder at $21.75 per ton and Midwest Asphalt Corp. recommended alternate bidder at $22.25 based on shortest pick -up distance; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.75; and Commercial Asphalt at $21.40. Bids for Cut -Back Asphalt (delivered) showing Koch Asphalt Company recommended sole bidder at $1.0222 per gallon. Bids for Winter Mix (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recommended low bidder at $27.25 per ton; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $28.00; and Midwest Asphalt Corp. at $28.50. Motion of Member Richards was. seconded by Member Bredesen for award to recommended low bidder or alternate bidder for concrete sand, buck shot, gravel base, limestone, seal -coat chips, ready mix bituminous, cut -back asphalt and winter mix. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for hydrofluisilicic acid and liquid chlorine (water treatment chemicals) showing Hawkins Chimical low bidder at $25.95; Dixie Petro Chemicals at $29.45; and Jones Chemical at $37.93. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder Hawkins Chemical, Inc. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. /v G 4/1/85 DEMOLITION OF WOODDALE SCHOOL BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS TO SITE AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had given concept approval on the recommendations of the consultant /staff regarding the Wooddale School site, Utley Park and West 50th Street and had directed the staff to prepare revised plans with costs that would incorporate the Council's wishes on the three issues. Costs for the first section include: Wooddale School demolition $175,000.00 Site improvement 25,000.00 42 parking spaces on east side of Wooddale park 35,137.20 (includes construction cost, engineering and capitalized interest) Mr. Rosland pointed out that the estimated costs can be offset by the remaining $75,000.00 from the School District, $100,000 from the Park Budget on a four -year $25,000 per year contribution, $25,000 from the Developers' Fund, and a proposal to develop an assessed project to St. Stephen's Church for the parking lot, similar to the Colonial Church project at Countryside Park. If the Council authorizes the staff recommendations, the Wooddale School building would be demolished, the parking lot with access off Wooddale Avenue would be constructed together with some site improvements to prepare its use as a park. As directed by Council, input would be obtained from the neighborhood as to the design of the park prior to award of bids for the work. Mr. Rosland advised that the Edina Foundation Board met with representatives of the Edina Historical Society and are considering the possibility of holding the Edinamite benefit at Wooddale School as a summer celebration in conjunction with the Society on a tentative date of July 13, and that demolition could start probably within the following week. With regard to West 50th Street, Mr. Rosland reported that the variance procedure has been initiated for the section from Wooddale Avenue to Halifax Avenue. He noted that a formal public.hearing must be conducted for the West 50th Street recon- struction project. Member Bredesen commented that with regard to the construction of parking spaces on the Wooddale and Utley Park sites we should insure that St. Stephens Church should participate by sharing in the cost of the entire project. He reiterated that the proposed uses for the park should be discussed with the neighborhood before final plans are set. Mr. Rosland indicated that the amount of money recommended to be spent there would not complete the park as might be desired and that at budget time the Council may wish to discuss further expenditures. Donna Skagerberg, representing the Edina Historical Society was present and briefly summarized a memorandum prepared by Foster Dunwiddie and herself regarding the need to find other facilities for the Edina Historical Society's collection which is now located in the Wooddale School. She noted that the Society currently occupies 3,100 sq. ft. on the lower level of the School and asked that the Council Members start thinking about where the Society's new home may be located. Several proposed locations have been identified which would perhaps form an Edina historical center and the Society's goal.is to be relocated in time for the Edina Centennial in 1988 and to dedicate the entire project at that time. There being no further comment, Member Turned moved the following action: 1) To approve the financing plan as outlined by. staff;. 2) To authorize plans and spceifications for the total demolition of the Wooddale School building, 3) To negotiate with St. Stephen's Church for an assessed parking lot project, using the Colonial Church /Countryside Park as a model, 4) To proceed with the initial park development after input from the neighborhood to determine the best plan, and 5) To set August 1, 1985, as the date by which the Wooddale School building must be vacated. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. JOAN LONSBURY NOMINATED TO METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION. Mayor Courtney advised that Joan Lonsbury, Chairman of the Edina Park Board, has sub- mitted her application for appointment to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission and has asked for the Council's support of her nomination. Member Turner thereupon moved adoption of the following resolution to be sent with a letter of recommendation to the Metropolitan Council: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is seeking applications to fill an opening on The Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and WHEREAS, Joan D. Lonsbury has served as a member of the Edina Park Board since 1972 and has provided leadership as chairman of the Board since 1981, and WHEREAS, she chaired the Municipal Swimming Pool Committee from 1975 to 1980, and WHEREAS, she has been a member of the Edina Art Center Board and the Art Center Development Committee; and ( -D-1 85 WHEREAS, she has with great dedication shared her time and talents with the Edina community by serving on numerous committees and as a member of various organizations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the name of JOAN D. LONSBURY be submitted for appointment,to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. REPORT GIVEN ON LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT. Mayor Courtney introduced Elliott Perovich, Chairman of the Regional Transit Board (RTB), who was present to report on light rail transit. Mr. Perovich said that Alison Fuhr, TRB Board Member, is doing an excellent job in representing District 11 which includes Edina. He stated that the light rail transit issue has been around for many years and there has always been discussion about connecting Minneapolis and St. Paul by some type of rail system. More recently, the Metropolitan Council has said that all metro transit will be rubber - tired. In 1980 the legislature mandated to the Council that they reconsider transit in the University Avenue and Southwest corridors to look for a better alternative to the regular route bus service. A number of years ago Hennepin County purchased the abandoned right of way of the C & NW Railroad from downtown Minneapolis all the way out to Victoria. Hennepin County then entered into a joint powers agreement with Minneapolis, who is interested in the Hiawatha corridor, with St. Paul, who is interested in light rail between the cities, and other suburban cities to do an implementation study. The study was to look at all three corridors with the presumption that there were preferred alternatives to the bus system. Following that study, the Regional Transit Board was formed whose task it was to study all aspects of the transit issue and to then make a recommen- dation to the Council.. In February, the Board decided that the University Avenue corridor was a priority and that light rail was the recommended major mode of transit. By approximately June, a contract for preliminary design and engineering on the University corridor and connecting links will be awarded. The Board has set the following schedule: 1) one and a half years for the preliminary design and engineer- ing, 2) by December 1986 decide whether light rail is really feasible, 3) if it is deemed feasible, necessary legislation will be sought in the 1987 session, 4) construction of track to begin in late 1987 or early 1988, and 5) approximately 2 to 3 years to complete the 10 plus miles of tract between Minneapolis and St. Paul., Mr. Perovich pointed out that whatever expenditure for the preliminary design and engineering, that 70 to 75% of that expenditure will be useable for planning transit in any of those corridors regardless of whether light rail is feasible or not, that it would be a total transit analysis. The Board will also do a complete transit needs analysis for the total metro area to try to identify the major transit corridors and how to improve transit through the area. Estimated cost for the University corridor is about $365,000,000 and if the system is routed underground in downtown Minneapolis it would add about $80,000,000 to the cost. Mr. Perovich also explained other functions of the RTB in addition to the light rail transit issue. No action was taken by the Council. (Mayor Courtney turned the chair over to Member Richards at this point and temporarily left the meeting.) FEASIBILITY REPORT 85 -2 FOR WESTWOOD COURT WATERMAIN APPROVED;' HEARING DATE SET. City Engineer Hoffman presented Feability Report 85 -2, for construction of water - main for Westwood Court which has been requested by .petition and recommended that hearing date be set for April 15, 1985. Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON WATERMAIN.IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -353 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, April 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 iJ 4/1/85 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -353 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, April 15, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: Estimated Cost 1. Westwood -Court Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -353 $75,559.37 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed improvement includes Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED FOR PLAN APPROVAL AND AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT BLAKE RD /VERNON AVENUE AND TRACY AVENUE /VERNON AVENUE. Mr. Hoffman explained that it is necessary for the Council to adopt various resolutions for plan approval and agreement for participation in construction of traffic signals at CSAH 158 (Blake Road /Vernon .Avenue and Tracy Avenue /Vernon Avenue). The estimated City participation is $95,760.00 with $47,880.00 being regular State -Aid funding; $31,920.00 being also a State =Aid funding requiring a resolution to expend it on the County road system; and $15,960.00 estimated as local funds from the City's budget. Hennepin County will fund $31,920.00 as.their normal participation. Staff would recommend approval of the resolutions, including a resolution to expend an estimated $31,920.00 on the County Road system from the City's municipal State -Aid funds. Member Turner then introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8440 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 and Blake Rd./ Olinger Blvd. for the construction thereof within the limits of the City as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things approved. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, PLans for Hennepin County Project No. 8441 showing proposed traffic control signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 at Tracy Ave. for the construction thereof within the limits of the City as a County State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things approved. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Blake Rd /Olinger Blvd., Hennepin County Project No. 8440, Agreement No. PW 03 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 03711 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8440. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Tracy Ave., Hennepin County Project No. 8441, Agreement No. PW - 04 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That the Agreement be in all things approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW 04- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8441. RESOLUTION APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE -AID FUNDS To C.S.A.H. PROJECT WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of.a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 158 within the limits of said municipality, And WHEREAS, Said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways and identified in its records as S.A.P. No. 27- 758 -04, 120 - 152 -07 and 27- 758 -03, 120 - 147 -08; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $31,920.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolutions adopted. --109 4/1/85 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT APPROVED WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR 1494 /FRANCE AVENUE PROJECT. Mr. Hoffman recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had approved final plans for the 1494 /France Avenue interchange project and authorized expen- diture of State -Aid funds for the project. Hennepin County is entering into an agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) to cover all construc- tion costs not borne by MNDOT. The cooperative agreement which Hennepin County seeks with the City of Edina is a sub - agreement in which the City agrees to a portion of the cost of the construction. Mr. Hoffman advised that staff has reviewed the agreement and would recommend that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to sign the agreement. The recommendation includes that all city funding be from our Municipal State Aid Funds as determined to be eligible by the State -Aid Office of MNDOT. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction on County State Aid Highway No. 17 at I -494, Hennepin County Project 7927, Agreement No. PW 08 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved, subject to all funding by the City be from the Municipal State Aid Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. PW- 08- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 7927. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. REDEVELOPMENT OF MANN DRIVE -IN THEATER PROPERTY IN BLOOMINGTON DISCUSSED. Mr. Hughes advised that the Planning Department had received an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW).for the redevelopment of the Mann Drive -In Theater Property on France Avenue in the City of Bloomington which is proposed by the Homart Develop- ment Company. This large scale project proposes 1.5 million square feet of office space and 350 hotel rooms for the 26.3 acre site which includes the Mann Theater and Ramada Inn. The project proposes 5,100 parking spaces in a five -level parking ramp. The EAW suggests that it will generate 17,925 vehicle trips daily. Mr. Hughes explained that the EAW is the first step in the environmental review process. Because of its size, this project will automatically require an Environmental Impact Statement. The site is almost identical in size to the Edinborough site in Edina but would have an anticipated traffic generation of about three and one -half times that of Edin- borough. The proposed project, due to its.density, may adversely affect Edina from a traffic and aesthetic standpoint. He stated that staff will attend an April 2 meeting concerning the EAW to learn more about the project and will keep the Council advised of developments. The Council Members agreed that the proposed development would have a deleterious effect on the entire area and it was suggested that the Council Members contact members of the Bloomington City Council to express their concern. Mr. Hoffman advised that he was meeting on April 3 with the traffic engineer from Bloomington out on the site to discuss road patterns in the area. Mr. Hughes stated that staff would bring an up -dated report back to the Council on April 15. No formal action was taken. (Mayor Courtney returned to the meeting at this point.) CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney stated that a list of 19 names had been submitted-by the Council Members as probable City Hall Space Study Committee members. After discussion on how to select_the.committee it was informally agreed that Members Richards and Turner should chose a chairman and then work with that person to create a committee of about seven members, including the City Manager or-his designee, and to have the committee in place by April 15,..1985. BONN PROPERTY PROPOSED AS GIFT TO.CITY. Member Richards reported that Mrs. Jessie Bonn, 6005 Pine Grove Road, is proposing to donate approximately the south half of her property to the City, estimated..at one acre.in.size. The subject property would be contiguous at least in part to the Carson property that is already in City ownership. Member Richards said that he had told Mrs. Bonn that, as with the Carson property, the City might assist in a survey and appraisal of the parcel.. and do the necessary paperwork if the City was_.willing to accept the property. No objection being heard, Member Richards made a motion that the staff be directed to assist Mrs. Bonn in a survey and appraisal of the property and determine what . documents will be needed in order that Mrs. Bonn may convey the property to the City of Edina as a donation. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND CITY PLANNER APPOINTMENTS ANNOUNCED. Mr. Rosland advised that due.to the resignation of Mark Bernhardson, he was appointing Gordon Hughes to the position of Assistant City Manager and appointing Craig Larsen to the position of City Planner, effective as of April 29, 1985. //0 4/1/85 SENIOR POLICE RESERVE ACTIVITIES REPORTED. Mr. Rosland reported that each Senior Police Reserve Officer has now signed a contract and has agreed to fulfill.his.con- tractural assignments for which he is paid. At the end of the contract period each officer must summarize his duties and activities. This has resulted in having all of the reserve officers actively performing various tasks or participating in programs that have been developed by the Police Department. No action was taken. RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION FOR EDINA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF ASSOCIATION. Mr. Rosland stated that Bill Hansen and LeRoy Lisk were present on behalf of the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association to request the Council's support for pending legislation. Mr. Hansen explained that in 1979 legislation was passed relating to firefighters relief associations but that provision for survivors' benefits was somehow not included in the state -wide law. He introduced William A. Bierman, of the firm of Sieloff and Bierman, who had formerly worked for the Minnesota Senate.to explain the proposed legislation. Mr. Bierman said that the proposed legislation would repeal a portion of a special law relating to the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association with regard to survivors' benefits. If the legislation is passed, the state -wide law would come into place. In seeking to come under the state -wide law by repealing the special law the Edina Association does not seek to change any benefits that it now pays, but it would allow increases in survivors' benefits over a period of time if the funding in the association were sufficient. He added that the chief author of the bill, H.F. 1273, is Mary Forsythe who has advised that the legislative tradition in the House favors approval of all local bills by the local governing body. Mr. Lisk, treasurer of the Edina Association, stated that currently under the special law the survivors' benefit and funeral benefit is frozen at $135 /mo. and this change in law would permit -an increase in the benefits in the future if warranted. After some discussion, Member Kelly offered the following resolution and moved adoption: RFC0T.TTTT0W WHEREAS, the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association was established to provide benefits for Edina's Volunteer Firefighters; and WHEREAS, the Edina Association had been governed under a special law, Laws of Minnesota (1965) Chapter 592, as amended by Chapter 644 (1969), and Chapter 229 (1975); and WHEREAS, the 1979 State Legislature passed the Codified Chapter 424A of Minnesota Statutes to standardize governance and eliminate special laws governing these individual associations, repealing the section of Edina's special law relating to pension benefits; and WHEREAS, House File 1273 /Senate File 1292 repeals the special Edina law relating to survivor benefits; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina supports the passage of House File 1273 /Senate File 1292. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CROCKER AND CROWELL'S FIRST ADDITION DISCUSSED. Mr. Hoffman advised that a letter has been received from Jon Otterlei, 4704 Merilane, asking that a release be initiated to approve the return of Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the State so that the land may be purchased for the purpose of building a single or duplex home on the lot. Mr. Hoffman recalled that the lots were acquired from the State by the City of Morn - ingside originally for storage of public waters - running off streets in the area. However, there is now no runoff of water from the streets because of construction of storm sewers and the property is no longer required for that purpose. He noted that there is some drainage of water from Lot 8 and Lot 19 into the adjacent properties in St. Louis Park. Mr. Hoffman identified two concerns that should be considered before taking any action on the request: 1) that the immediate neighbors should be notified of the request, and 2) the impact of adding hard surface to Lot 8 on the properties in St. Louis Park. It was informally agreed by the Council that the neighbors should be notified and the matter then be brought back for action by the Council. WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR BLOCKS 6 AND 7, FINDELL CLARK ADDITION AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION. Being advised that a 100% petition had been received for construction of watermain, storm sewer and sanitary sewer for Block 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS UPON PETITION THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct watermain, storm sewer and sanitary sewer improvements on Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, and to assess the entire cost against the property of petitioners and that said petition has been signed by all owners of real property abutting on said street where said improvements -are to be located. 4/1/85 2. The making of said improvement -in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Stautues, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designed and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -453 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -175 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -369 The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on said Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, where said improvements are to be located. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 (ON -SALE WINE LICENSES) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had given First Reading to Ordinance No. 902 -A1 To Allow Sales of Wine Only in Qualifying Restaurants. At that meeting it appeared that there were still some issues on which the Council Members differed and staff would recommend the following procedure: a) that any amendments to the language in the First Reading be amended prior to passage of Second Reading, b) that if Second Reading is given, any changes then would.be written into the ordinance, and c) that some action be taken regarding the license fees. No com- ment being.heard, Member Richards moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A1. Motion was seconded by Mayor Courtney. Member Kelly then moved that the draft ordinance be amended in Section 42 to delete the provision that all person- .. nel who serve wine be licensed and to substitute the provision that a licensed manager in charge must be on the premises at all times that the restaurant is open for business. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen, Richards Motion carried. Member Turner moved that the draft ordinance be amended to provide for termination of all on -sale wine licenses after five years so that the ordinance would be reviewed by the Council at that time. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly, Richards Motion carried. City Attorney Erickson recommended that some minor changes be made to the draft ordinance: 1) that the definition of "person" delete the phrase "and includes also the municipal liquor store ", 2) that the ordinance be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication, and 3) that no license shall be effective prior to -July 1, 1985. The recommended minor changes were approved by unanimous vote of the Council. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A1, amended as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and amended as follows: "Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine is served but not in conjunction with regular full menu service. "City" means the City of Edina. "Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public Safety. "Council" means the Council of the City of Edina. "Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where wine will be served and consumed. "Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu. "Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust, institution, corporation or municipality. "Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public,. and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its guests. definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe" or "restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation. Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance, ". Sec. 3. Part H. is hereby added as follows: r/� 4/1/85 PART H. ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS." Sec. 36. License Required; Term of License. (a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, sell for on -sale any wine at or under 14% by volume in conjunction with the sale of food without first having received a license therefor pursuant to this Part H. (b) On -sale wine licenses shall be issued only to qualifying restaurants as determined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance No. 731. (c) Manager's licenses shall be issued only to qualifying individuals as determined below. (d) No license issued under this Part H shall be effective prior to 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1985. (e) Every license issued under this Part H shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on the July 1 following its date of issuance, except that licenses issued prior to July 1, 1985 shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1986. Sec. 37 Licensing Procedure. (a) The provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City shall apply to all licenses issued under this Part H and to the holders of such licenses, except that on -sale wine licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the Council, and except that manager's licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the City Manager. Additionally, all on -sale wine licenses must be approved by the Commissioner. Every person licensed, or applying for an on -sale wine license, under this ordinance, in addition to other requirements imposed by this ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of such a license, shall demon- strate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minne- sota Statutes, Section 340.95, to the City Clerk, as a condition to the issuance or renewal of such license, in the manner and to the extent required by Minnesota Statute, Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided, if any such licensee or applicant claims exemption from the requirements of said statute, proof of such exemption shall be established by affidavit given by such licensee or applicant, such ' affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to the City Clerk. (b) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, the applicant shall, in the application form, provide all information required by the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and such other information as deemed necessary by the City during the application process to determine compliance with the provisions of this ordinance and applicable State laws and regulations. (c) Applications for the renewal of an existing on -sale wine license shall be made at least 60 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. Applications for renewal of an existing manager's license shall be made at least 30 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date of expiration of the license. The renewal application may incorporate by reference all information contained in the original application, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. If, in the judgment of the City Council as to on -sale wine licenses, and in the judgment of the City Manager as to Manager's licenses, good and sufficient cause for the applicant's.failure to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council, or City Manager, as the case may be, may, if the other provisions of this ordinance are complied with, grant the application notwithstanding such failure to timely apply. (d) No on -sale wine license shall be transferred to any person or premises by the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted, by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise, descent or invol- untarily by the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application containing all of the information required in an original application, and comply- ing with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the'approval of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner, provided that an application for transfer may refer to, and incorporate therein by reference,'the information set forth in the original application for the license to be transferred, to the extent such information is then true, current and applicable. . (e) Manager's license shall be personal to the person to whom it is issued and shall not be transferable. (f) Any change in the persons named in the original application for an on -sale wine license or any change in such original application, as required by Sec. 37 of this ordinance, including any increase in the size or seating capacity of the licensed premises, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes_ of this ordinance; provided, however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the limited partners of 10% or less cumulatively over the then license period shall not be deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that if the licensee is a corporation, a change in stock ownership of 10% or less cumulatively over the then license period shall not be deemed a transfer. Sec. 38. Financial Requirements for an On -Sale Wine License. (a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application, the applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee. t. 4/1%85 Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional $2,000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of'the application by the City. The cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but in no event shall it exceed $500`if the investigation is limited to the State of Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit monies not expended on the investigation shall be refunded to the applicant. All investigative expenses incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to consideration of the license application by the Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall not exceed $100 unless there is a change of ownership of more than 10% cumulatively over the then existing license period as provided in Section 37(f) of this ordinance. (b) License Fees - The applicable fees are listed in Ordinance No. 171. Licenses terminated by the licensee prior to the end of the term shall be prorated quarterly with fees being refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the license was not used. All fees shall be paid at the time of filing the license application. Should any license application be withdrawn or denied, the fee shall be refunded except for $75. Provided, however, if denied because of willful misstatement in the application, no refund shall be made. (c) Bond and Insurance - The same requirements set forth in Sec. 11 of this ordinance apply to licenses under Part H. The insurance requirements set out in Sec. 37 of this Ordinance must be met prior to issuance of a license under this Part H. (d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent at the time of license issuance must be paid prior to issuance of the license as required by Section 12(f) of this ordinance. Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing for an On -Sale Wine License. In addition to the conditions set forth in Sec. 12(d) and (e) and Sec. 13(d), the following conditions apply both as a condition of on -sale wine license approval and ongoing license retention: (a) Licensee - The on -sale wine licensee must: 1) Be of good moral character and repute. 2) Be of legal drinking age. 3) Be eligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340, and the regulations promulgated by the Commissioner. 4) Be an individual owner, a partnership or a corporation. 5) If an individual, not have (A) been convicted, within the five years prior to the application for a license, of any violation of any law of the United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other state or territory, or of any local ordinance with regard to: (i) the manufacture, sale, distribution or posession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other controlled substances; (ii) gambling; (iii) theft; or (iv) vice; or (B) had an intoxicating liquor license, including a wine -only on -sale license, revoked for any violation of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale, distribution or possession of intoxicating liquor or wine. 6) Have a manager, licensed under Sec. 42 of this Part H, in charge of and on the licensed premises at all times during which the licensed premises are open for business. 7) Sign a statement indicating that he or she has reviewed and understands the pertinent sections of this Ordinance and of State laws and regulations. 8) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale or retail liquor dealer's special stamp or a federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or license. 9) Not be an employee or elected official of the City of Edina. 10) Not have falsified any information given either in the application or in the process of investigation. 11) On renewal, not have been found in violation of any provision of this ordinance or applicable State stautues or regulations. 12) If an individual, be a U.S. citizen. 13) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualified under subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11 of this paragraph (a). (b) Licensed Premises The licensed premises must meet the following require- ments: 1) Be in a PC1, -PC2 or PC3, or Mixed Development District or be in a restaurant permitted in the R -1 District, as established by the City Zoning Ordinance. 2) Have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building in which the licensed premises are located._ Entrances from or exits to a public concourse or public lobby meet this requirement. 3) Be under the control of the licensee. 4) Be a restaurant having facilities for seating not fewer than 25 guests at one time. 5) Have a valid food establishment license and have a kitchen approved by the City Public Health Sanitarian. 6) Have appropriate space for storage, preparation or other handling or service of food which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of wine. I / V 4/1/85 7) Have a physical barrier between non - licensed premises and the licensed premises which prevents the passing of patrons from the licensed premises to areas outside of the licensed premises, except for approved and required entrances to and exists from the restaurant portion of the licensed premises. This includes, but is not limited to, licensed premises outside a building or in a public, or quasi - public, mall, concourse, plaza or similar area. 8) Be in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, statutes and regulations. . Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. In addition to the conditions stated in Sec. 12(a), (b), (g) and (h), Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33, the following apply to on -sale wine licenses issued under this Part H: (a) No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a meal to be consumed with the wine. (b) No wine over 14% alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed. (c) No sales or consumption of wine shall be permitted at a bar or beyond the licensed premises. (d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in volume than one liter. . '(e) No person working in the licensed premises may be under the established legal drinking age except buspersons, dishwashers,.musicians, waiters and waitresses, provided that they shall not serve or sell wine. (f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on the licensed premises by any means or methods which result in wine prices which are less than those normally charged on the then regularly -used menu, including, but not limited to, two- for -one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters. (g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale or keep for sale wine in any original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall directly, or through any other person, dilute, or in any manner tamper with, the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee of any wine in the original package differing in composition, alcoholic content or type from the wine received from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it was purchased shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original package have been diluted, changed or tampered with. (h) Licensees under this Part H may sell wine during the same hours on Sunday as holders of Sunday sale licenses may sell intoxicating liquor. (i) The City inspections authorized by Sec. 12(g) of this ordinance are anticipated to be made at least twice during each license period. (j) All applicable provisions of State statutes and regulations shall be complied with in connection with the on -sale of wine. Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued under Part H of this ordinance, except to the extent inconsistent with applicable State statutes and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the State statutes and regulations shall apply. Sec. 42. Manager's License. (a) The manager(s) or persons(s) in charge of a licensed premise shall be an individual or individuals. (b) Each individual manager shall apply for an individual manager's license on application forms provided by the City Clerk. The application shall be processed in a manner similar to that for an on -sale wine license. Each applica- tion shall describe the licensed premises to be managed by the applicant. The manager's license shall be restricted to the licensed premises described in the application. (c) No investigative fees shall be required for a manager's license appli- cation, but if investigated with an application for an on -sale wine license and if investigation of the proposed manager for the licensed premises results in additional expense, or out -of -state investigation, additional deposits may be required to be made under Sec. 38. (d) The applicant for a manager's license, in order to be granted a manager's license hereunder, shall and must comply with all requirements of this ordinance, State statutes and regulations which are applicable to an applicant for a manager's license under this Part H, and including, without limitation, Sec. 39(a) and Sec. 40 of this Part H. (e) The license fee is listed in Ordinance No. 171. The provisions of Sec. 38(b) apply to this Sec. 42, except that no refund of the license fee shall be made. Sec. 43. Automatic Termination. The provisions of this Part H shall terminate automatically at 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1990. No licenses shall be issued under this Part H after said time and date. All licenses then previously issued under this Part H also shall automatically terminate at such time and date and thereafter no wine shall be sold under such licenses. Sec. 44. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. �lLD 4/1/85 Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: Mayor Acting City Clerk Mr. Rosland then reviewed the fees that were recommended by staff,.based on best estimates of cost, as follows: 50 seats or fewer - $550, 51 to 100 seats - $600, 101 to 150 seats - $650, and over 150 seats - $700. Member Bredesen commented that license applicants should be told that-the license fees may change in the future if costs are above or below present estimates. Member Richards asked if the license fee could be based upon actual.cost. Attorney Erickson explained that the separate investigation fee will be based on actual expense involved, with all deposit monies not expended on the investigation being either applied to the license fee or refunded to the applicant. License.fees are required to be fair estimates of the costs in- curred in issuing the licenses and in monitoring the licensed premises. It was noted that the on -sale wine license fee cannot exceed one -half the fee for on -sale liquor licenses. After some discussion, Member Richards introduced Ordinance No. 171 -A20 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AND TO ESTABLISH FEE FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number of Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is amended to read as follows: ORD. SEC.. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 902 10 Intoxicating liquor $1,400.00 per year 36b on -sale license Sec. 2. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171.is hereby amended by adding the following thereto: ORD. SEC. NO. NO. PURPOSE OF.FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO. 902 38(b) On -sale wine license Per year, restaurants with 36g 50 seats or fewer $550.00 51 -.100 seats, inclusive 600.00 ..101 - 150 seats, inclusive 650.00. Over 150 seats 700.00 902 42(e) Manager's license 36h Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted. HEARING DATE SET FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS. As recommended by staff, Member Turner'.s motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting April 15, 1985, as the hearing date for preliminary approval of $12,000,000 Hospital System Revenue bonds. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PAYMENT OF 911 CHARGES FOR ALI SERVICES AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland recalled that when the 911 System was put in place in December of 1982, there were three levels, of service available: 1) automatic routing, in which a telephone dialing 911 anywhere in Edina would be automatically routed to Edina's dispatch office, 2) automatic number identification (ANI), in which the telephone number of the calling party would be displayed at the dispatch center, and 3) automatic location identification (ALI), in which the address of the calling number would be displayed at the dispatch office. It was the understanding of the cities when 911 was established that the State would pick up the automatic rounting costs together with the costs for the ANI service. The cost for ALI equipment at our dispatch point was to be funded by us, and that the initial capital cost, together with the ongoing servicing costs of the central computer for ALI would be funded by the counties. In June of 1983, the City was in- formed by Northwestern Bell that Hennepin County had been released from their contract to pay for the ALI ongoing charges and that they were attempting to come to the cities to collect those charges. .Since then the independent Primary Service Answering Points (PSAP's) have been attempting to reach a compromise with the County.i The County has finally agreed to accept the compromise that the.cities had proposed which was that the County would pick -up all the ALI costs up through July 1, 1984, and from /,/ ('7, 4/1/85 thereon the individual cities would pick up their.own costs. Montly costs for Edina are estimated at $457.00 per month. Staff would recommend that a resolution be adopted ratifying the County's action and that when Northwestern Bell does come forth with a contract amendment, that it then be ratified and the appropriate billings be paid. No comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the other independent PSAP's in Hennepin County initially selected the ALI feature of 911, in part based on the County's apparent agreement to refund the monthly service charges related to ALI, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has adamantly refused to pay those charges as an obligation since the inception of 911, and WHEREAS, a majority of. the independent PSAP's proposed a compromise in which Hennepin County would pick up all charges through June 30, 1984, and WHEREAS, in that compromise the City of Edina would pay the applicable monthly charges for the ALI service in addition to the equipment charges they are already paying from July 1, 1984, forward, and WHEREAS, it is of greater benefit to the taxpayers of the City of Edina, to pay its own charges rather than having the County pay its charges even though the City of Edina taxpayers still pay a portion of the ALI-costs for the dependent.. cities; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina agrees to the compromise ratified by the Hennepin County Board on March 14, 1985, relevent to 911 ALI charges. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 4/1/85: General Fund $77,268.72, Park Fund $9,600.00, Art Center $1,654.42, Golf Course Fund $11,843.45, Recreation Center Fund $2,826.95, Gun Range Fund $150.51, Utility Fund $6,796.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,103.11, Construction Fund $2,033.39, Total $113,277.65; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 2/28/85: General Fund $150,034.91, Park Fund $1,414.31, Art Center $820.59, Swimming Pool Fund $65.53, Golf Course Fund $431.19, Recreation Center Fund $6,847.67, Gun Range Fund $512.25, Utility Fund $17,374.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $251,338.82, Total $428,840.17. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 11:20 p.m. Acting City Clerk tt-7-) 1985 AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN of THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Table of Contents I. Introduction A. Recitals and Statement of Authority B. Definitions C. Statement of Need D. Statement of Objectives II. 1985 Project A. Description of 1985 Project 1. 1984 Project Area 2. Conditions of Blight 3. Redevelopment Activities B. Development of 1985 Project Area 1. Use 2. Redevelopment Agreements C. Relocation D. Interest Reduction Program III. Financing of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985 Project A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost 1. Estimated Public Redevelopment Cost 2. Capital Proceeds of 1985 Project 3. Public Redevelopment Cost B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985 Project 1. In General 2. Issuance of Bonds 3. Bond Terms 4. Security for and Payment of Bonds IV. Implementation of 1985 Project and Plan A. In General B. Cooperation Agreement V. Additional Amendments to Plan VI. Original Plan VII. Exhibits Exhibit A - Legal description of tax parcels or portions thereof included in 1984 Project Area Exhibit B - Site Plan I. INTRODUCTION A. Recitals and Statement of Authority. The Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council have previously approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, which established a tax increment financing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9. It has been proposed that the 1985 Project Area, as hereinafter defined, be developed as a mixed use development containing residential condominium units, retail areas, office buildings, rental apartments for the elderly and public and private amenities. This 1985 Amendment supplements and amends the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area. This 1985 Amendment is established by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and this 1985 Amendment is approved by such bodies pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 and Sections 273.71 to 273.86. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of this First Amendment, have the meanings given to them in this Section: "Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Bonds" means the bonds or obligations, now or hereafter issued by the City or the HRA (which may be in one or more issues) to finance the acquisition of the 1985 Project Area (and related costs), to finance the purchase of the HRA Public Improvements and related costs, to finance interest reductions to be made by the HRA pursuant to this Agreement and related costs, to finance construction of the Park, to pay assessments against the Condominium Project Area for City Public Improvements, and other public redevelopment costs to be paid by the HRA with respect to the 1985 Project, and also means and includes all other bonds of the City issued prior to the date of this Agreement and secured in whole or in part by the tax increment generated by the Redevelopment Plan area and the improvements thereon. The term "Bonds" shall also include any bonds or obligations issued to refund any Tax Increment Bonds. "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project" means all amounts received or to be received by the City or the HRA from the sale or lease of property in the 1985 Project Area. "Captured Assessed Value" means that portion of the Assessed Value in excess of the Original Assessed Value as adjusted from time to time, if any. "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "City Public Improvements" means streets, roads, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and utilities to be constructed and installed by the City and for which special assessments will be assessed against some or all of the 1985 Project Area. "Condominium Development" means the approximately three hundred and ninety -two (392) residential condominiums and approximately six hundred (600) underground, private parking spaces, to be constructed in approximately seven (7) phases on the Condominium Project Area, including related and appurtenant landscaping, driveways, walkways and improvements, with respect to which at least eighty (80 %) percent of the residential units therein shall be reserved for sale to, and sold to, families or individuals with an adjusted gross income which is equal to or less than one hundred ten (110 %) percent of the Median Family Income. "Condominium Project Area" means the seven (7) areas approximately identified as such on the Site Plan. "Developer" means any person acquiring any portion of the 1985 Project from the HRA or any other person and constructing any of the Private Improvements. "District" means the tax increment financing district established by the Plan. "Elderly Housing Development" means the approximately two hundred two (202) rental units for elderly occupancy (of which at least twenty (20 %) percent shall be rented to families or individuals who on the date of their initial occupancy of their rental unit are individuals of low or moderate income within the meaning of Section 103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and the regulations promulgated or proposed thereunder, as now or hereafter amended) in the approximately seventeen (17) story building to be constructed on the Elderly Housing Project Area, and shall include the Elderly Housing Project Area, related covered and surface parking, congregate dining facilities, a public restaurant with approximately two hundred fifty (250) seats, a gift shop, a child care facility with a capacity of approximately one hundred (100) children, and related and appurtenant landscaping, driveways, walkways and improvements. -2- "Elderly Housing Project Area" means approximately the area identified as such on the Site Plan. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina. "HRA Public Improvements" means the public easements, and certain landscaping, utilities, streets, driveways, sidewalks, surface and covered parking and other work on the 1985 Project Area to be constructed by the HRA at the HRA's cost, but shall not include the Park. "Office Development" means the approximately two hundred five thousand (205,000) square feet of office space to be constructed on the Office Project Area, including related and appurtenant covered and surface parking, landscaping, driveways, walkways and improvements, to be constructed in two phases of approximately one hundred seven thousand (107,000) square feet and ninety -eight thousand (98,000) square feet, respectively, in two (2) buildings of six (6) to eight (8) stories each. "Office Project Area" means approximately the two (2) areas identified as such on the Site Plan. "Original Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all taxable property in the District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, as of the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76. or as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76. "Original Plan" means the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, as hereto amended and supplemented by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to law. "Outstanding" when used with respect to Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed and prepaid or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel, tract or plat of land comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan. "Park" means the public park to be constructed upon the Park Site, including all landscaping, recreational facilities and equipment, and other amenities therein or related thereto upon the Park Site. -3- "Park Site" means approximately the area identified as such on the Site Plan. "Plan" means the Original Plan as supplemented and amended by this 1985 Amendment and as further supplemented and amended from time to time by the HRA and City Council. "Private Improvements" means the Condominium Development, the Office Development and the Elderly Housing Development. "Public Redevelopment Cost" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City and /or the HRA on Redevelopment Activities, less the Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project. "Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken: (1) by the HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the 1985 Project, including but not limited to the acquisition of the 1985 Project Area, the acquisition and construction of the HRA Public Improvements,'the carrying out of an interest reduction program with respect to the Condominium Development and Elderly Housing Development, and the acquisition and construction of the Park; (2) by the City in aid of the 1985 Project pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to, the acquisition and construction of the City Public Improvements; and (3) by private developers in constructing the Private Improvements. "Redevelopment Agreement" means any and all agreements between the HRA or the City, or both and a Developer with respect to the 1985 Project. "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property in the District from time to time which is allocable to the Captured Assessed Value of such property. "Project" means all of the Private Improvements, the Park and all of the HRA Public Improvements constructed or to be constructed upon the Project Area, and includes the Project Area. "1985 Project Area" means the entire parcel of land upon which the Project is or is to be constructed, as more fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. C. Statement of Need. There exists in the City a shortage of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for the elderly and persons of low and moderate income and the HRA, -4- as in the past, is desirous of promoting the development of housing for the elderly and other persons in the City. There is a need for redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area which will result in the increase of employment opportunities for residents of the City, the increase of the value of property subject to taxation by the City and other local government units, and the increase of general economic activity in the City, all of which will reduce unemployment, prevent chronic unemployment, improve living standards, promote desirable development of 1985 Project Area at a cost reasonably related to the public purpose to be served without residential clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment for a use consistent with emphasis on housing for the elderly and persons of low and moderate income, prevent the emergence of blighted property and areas, prevent the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources, add to the cultural facilities available to the public in the City, and encourage and enhance the general health and welfare of the residents of the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken by the City with respect to the 1985 Project are necessary to secure the redevelopment of the property included in the 1985 Project Area, at this time and in a manner which will best meet those needs. D. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and carrying out the 1985 Project and in financing of the Public Redevelopment Cost thereof. as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in paragraph C: a. by promoting and securing the prompt redevelopment of the property in the 1985 Project Area in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, a portion of which property is not now in productive use; b. by promoting and securing additional employment opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding area, thereby improving living standards, reducing unemployment, and preventing areas of chronic unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources; c. by promoting and securing additional housing for the elderly, persons of low and moderate income and other residents of the City and surrounding area at a reasonable cost, thereby enhancing living conditions and their general health and welfare; -5- d. by securing the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, Hennepin County and the school district in which the 1985 Project Area is located, and other local government taxing jurisdictions, in order to better ensble such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; and e. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Redevelopment Activities in or adjacent to the 1985 Project Areaa which are necessary to serve the 1985 Project Area and for the orderly and beneficial development of the 1985 Project Area and adjacent areas of the City. II. 1985 PROJECT A. Description of 1985 Project. 1. 1985 Project Area. The 1985 Project Area is unimproved and comprises approximately acres of property located in the City. The legal description of the 1985 Project Area is as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The 1985 Project Area is presently owned by the HRA. 2. Conditions of Blight. The 1985 Project Area is blighted by virtue of conditions of unusual and difficult physical characteristics of the ground and other conditions which has prevented normal development of the land by private enterprise and has resulted in stagnant and unproductive conditions of land. However, the 1985 Project Area is potentially useful and valuable for redevelopment which would contribute to the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The 1985 Project Area will not be reasonably available for redevelopment by private enterprise. or redeveloped by private enterprise, in the forseeable future, unless the blighting conditions thereof are removed. The City and the HRA can remove, or cause or assist a Developer to remove, such blighting conditions, and to redevelop the 1985 Project Area by construction and installation thereon of the Private Improvements and the Park by jointly exercising the powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose. 3. Redevelopment Activities. The 1985 Project includes the following Redevelopment Activities: a. By the City or the HRA, directly or pursuant to a Redevelopment Agreement with a Developer: (1) the payment of SAC and of water connection charges for the Housing Facilities, and the making of certain soil corrections, the conveyance to a Developer of the Condominium Project Area, the Elderly Housing Project Area and the Office Project Area the 1985 Project Area, the construction or installation of the Park, the City Public Improvements and HRA Public Improvement and other public amenities all as provided for in the Redevelopment Agreement; (2) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the 1985 Project; (3) the making of a lump sum payment or periodic payments to pay interest on a loan made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C or by a private lender to a Developer to finance the costs of construction and installation of the Condominium Development and Elderly Housing Development; (4) the issuance of the Bonds to finance the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project; and (5) the use of the Tax Increment derived from the District to pay the debt service on such Bonds, or otherwise pay the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project. b. By a Developer: (1) the construction and installation of the Private Improvement; (2) the performance of such Redevelopment Activities on behalf of the City or the HRA as may be required by the City or the HRA and specified in a Redevelopment Agreement, subject to reimbursement of the cost thereof by the City or the HRA from Tax Increments to be derived from the District; (3) the payment and financing of the cost of the Private Improvement; and (4) the operation of the Private Improvements. C. No contracts have been entered into for Redevelopment Activities. d. No development other than that described in this Section 3 is presently proposed to take place in the 1985 Project Area. B. Development of 1985 Protect Area. 1. Use. The property in the 1985 Project Area will be redeveloped by the construction and installation of the Park, the Private Improvements, the HRA Public Improvement and the City Public Improvement. 2. Redevelopment Agreements. The property 1985 Project Area on which the Private Improvements located will be sold by the HRA to a Developer for redevelopment pursuant to one or more Redevelopment under which, among other things, a Developer will be to construct and install the Private Improvement by -7- in the are to be Agreements required a specified date, the Private Improvements to have at least a specified minimum number of square feet, a specified minimum cost and a specified minimum Assessor's Market Value; to complete certain percentages of the work by specified dates pursuant to plans and specifications submitted to and building permits issued by or on behalf of the City, and pursuant to and in accordance with all other applicable governmental regulations; and to demonstrate its financial capability for so doing. Each Developer will also be required to enter into an Assessment Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 278.76, whereby it will agree to the minimum Assessor's Market Value of the 1985 Project Area upon completion of the construction and installation of the Private Improvement to be located thereon and will agree not to take any action to challenge or otherwise cause said Assessor's Market Value to be reduced at any time while the Bonds remain outstanding. In addition, if the HRA makes a periodic or lump sum payment to pay interest on a loan made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C or a private lender to a Developer to finance construction and installation of the Elderly Housing Development, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 12, the HRA will obtain an agreement which provides that upon the sale or transfer. by the Developer of the 1985 Project Area, the HRA shall be paid an amount to be determined under clause (b) of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 12, and the HRA will provide that the obligation of the Developer to pay this amount be secured by an interest of the HRA in the property. The interest of the HRA in the property shall consist of either a right of co- ownership or a lien or mortgage against the property and may be subordinate to other interests in the property. If the HRA makes a periodic or lump sum payment to pay interest made by a private lender to a developer to finance construction and installation of the Condominium Development in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 11, at least eighty (800) percent of the aggregate dollars appropriated by the HRA for this purpose shall be appropriated for units which are to be sold or occupied by families or individuals with an adjusted gross income which is equal to or less than one hundred ten (1100) of the median family income and the HRA shall abtain an agreement with the Developer evidencing the Developer's obligation to comply with this requirement. c. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of the 1985 Project. WE D. Interest Reduction Program. In connection with the 1985 Project the HRA will undertake an Interest Reduction Program under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 10 to assist in the financing of the Condominium Development and Elderly Housing Development both of which are intended primarily for occupancy by individuals of low and moderate income. In determining to proceed with an Interest Reduction Program the HRA has considered (i) the availability and affordability of other governmental programs, (ii) the availability and affordability of private mortgage financing, and (iii) the need for additional affordable mortgage credit to encourage the construction and enable the purchase of housing units within the jurisdiction of the HRA. The HRA will promulgate regulations for the Interest Rate Rrduction Program. III. FINANCING OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COST OF 1985 PROJECT A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost. 1. Estimated Public Redevelopment Cost. The total costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or indirectly, in carrying out the 1985 Project are estimated to be as follows: City Public Improvements to be paid from Tax Increments $ 710,000 HRA Public Improvements 2,050,000 Park 6,700,000 Interest Reduction Program 4,185,000 Bond Issuance Costs, including bond discount 250,000 Capitalized Interest on Bonds 2,100,000 HRA and City and Administrative Expenses. 500,000 Total Public Redevelopment Cost of Project $16,495,000 The items of cost and the amounts thereof shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon the best engineering, legal and other information now available. It is anticipated that the items of cost and the amounts thereof shown in each category above may decrease or increase, but that the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project will not exceed the amount shown above, plus interest to be paid on the Bonds (other than out of proceeds of the Bonds). The City and the HRA reserve the right to pay the cost of any element of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project from the proceeds of the Bonds herein authorized, or directly from Tax Increments derived from the District. 2. Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project. The Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project, comprising the cash proceeds of sale of property in the 1985 Project Area owned by the HRA to the Developer, are expected to be negligible. -9- 3. Public Redevelopment Cost. The Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or indirectly, in carrying out the 1985 Project, less the Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project, is expected to be $16,495,000, plus interest to be paid on the Bonds during their term (other than out of the proceeds of the Bonds). B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985 Project. 1. In General. The entire Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project will be paid from Tax Increment to be derived from the District, either directly or indirectly by payment of debt service on Bonds issued to finance such cost or reimbursement of the Developer for items of Public Redevelopment Cost paid directly by the Developer, or by making periodic or lump sum payments to pay interest on a loan made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C to the Developer to finance the construction and installation of the Condominium Development and Eldely Housing Development, or by some combination of the foregoing. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that a portion of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project will be financed by the issuance of the'Bonds in one or more series in the principal amount of not greater than $11,000,000. Certain Costs of the Interest Reduction Program to be undertaken in connection with the 1985 Project are not expected to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds and will be paid directly from Tax Increment derived from the District not needed to pay principal and interest on Bonds. The Bonds will be issued by the City or the HRA under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78. 3. Bond Terms. The terms of the Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 4. The Bonds will be in the principal amount of not greater than $11,000,000, will mature serially over a period of approximately 20 years, commencing on or after February 1, 1987, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing in 1986, and will be sold at public sale. 4. Security For And Payment Of Bonds. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City or the HRA, and the full faith and credit and the taxing powers of the City or the HRA -10- will be pledged for their payment. The principal of and interest on the Bonds will be payable from the Tax Increments to be derived from the District by the HRA and from ad valorem taxes to be levied on all taxable property in the City, but if necessary for the payment thereof, additional ad valorem taxes will be required by law to be levied on all taxable property in the City, which taxes will not be subject to any limitation as to rate and amount. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF 1985 PROJECT A. In General. The 1984 Project and this 1985 Amendment shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA. The HRA or the City shall sell and issue Bonds in the amount needed to finance the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project, less any portion thereof to be paid directly from Tax Increment derived from the District and shall use so much of the 1985 Tax Increment Bond proceeds available and Tax Increment derived from the District to pay such Public Redevelopment Cost as is necessary. B. Cooperation Agreement. If necessary, the City and the HRA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement for the purpose of specifying the duties and responsibilities of each with respect to the implementation of the 1985 Project and this 1985 Amendment, and the application of the Tax Increments to be derived from the 1985 Project Area. V. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The City and the HRA reserve the right to alter the 1985 Project and to further amend or modify the Plan by their joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City and the HRA specifically reserve the right to increase the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project and the amount of Bonds to be issued to finance such Public Redevelopment Cost, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the paying of additional Public Redevelopment Costs. VI. ORIGINAL PLAN The Original Plan except to the extent the provisions thereof are explicitly amended or supplemented by this 1985 Amendment shall remain in and be in full force and effect. -11- 1W 13"'. ow=i LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 1985 PROJECT AREA. A -1 EXHIBIT B SITE PLAN B -1 MA AMENDMENT THIS AMENDMENT, Made and entered into as of the day of May, 1985, by _anti between. the Housing and.' Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the HRA and Edina entered into an Agreement dated May 8, 1974 (the "Agreement "); and WHEREAS, the HRA and Edina now desire to amend the Agreement in the manner below set out. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the HRA and Edina.do hereby agree as follows: "1. The first sentence in Section 1, paragraph b. of the Agreement is hereby changed to read as follows: "The Executive Director shall be that person- in- eharge- e €- tl�e- R�anning- Bepatx�er�t- a €- Ediaa- from time to time appointed by the Director." 2. The- Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be and remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By: Its Chairman And. Its Secretary CITY OF EDINA By. Its Mayor And: Its Manager - 2 - Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9. It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "), which includes, among other things, the establishment of an interest reduction program under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 11 (the "Interest Reduction Program "). 2. The 1985 Amendment is described in the document entitled "1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1985 Amendment as so described is hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the 1985 Amendment. 3. It is acknowledged that it is presently proposed that a majority of the payments to be made by the HRA pursuant to the Interest Reduction Program will be in the form of periodic payments over a number of years and such payments are hereby authorized to be made over such period. Dated this 6th day of May, 1985. Chairman Attest: Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. -2- Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; APPROVING THE SALE OF LAND AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows.: 1. The.HRA and the Edina City - Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina-Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). A draft of the Agreement has been prepared and submitted to the HRA and is hereby directed to be filed with the Executive Director of the HRA. 2. On May 6, 1985, the HRA duly called and held a public hearing on the sale and transfer of such land to the Foundation pursuant to.the Agreement in accordance with Minnesota Statutes., Section 462.525,. subdivision 2. 3. The form of the Agreement is.hereby approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and i approved by the attorney for the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be conc1tisively evidenced by the execution of the Agreement by the Chairman and Executive Director of the HRA. The Chairman and Executive Director of the HRA are directed to execute the Agreement upon execution thereof by the Foundation. The Chairman and Executive Director of.the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. Dated this 6th day of May, 1985. Chairman Attest: Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was.signed by the. Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. �. ., all The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was.signed by the. Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN City: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on May 6, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the City in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City, and is a correct and complete copy of a resolution approved by the City Council at said meeting; and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this 6th day of May, 1985. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq., and a tax increment financing plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan established a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9 (the "District "). The HRA has approved amendments to the Plan designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "), which include, among other things, the establishment of an interest reduction program under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 11 (the "Interest Reduction Program ") and has requested that this Council approve the 1985 Amendment. This Council held a public hearing on the 1985 Amendment on May 6, 1985, after notice of the public hearing was published in The Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on April 25, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be heard on the subject were given an opportunity with respect thereto. 2. Approval. The 1985 Amendment is hereby approved. 3. Findings Under the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the 1985 Project Area, as defined in the 1985 Amendment would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The redevelopment plans for the 1985 Project Area as set forth in the 1985 Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area by private enterprise; and (C) The 1985 Amendment conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 4. Interest Reduction Program. It is acknowledged that it is presently proposed that a majority of the payments to be made by the HRA pursuant to the Interest Reduction Program will be in the form of periodic payments over a number of years and the HRA is hereby authorized to make such payments over such period. Attest: Passed by the Council this 6th day of May, 1985. C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Marcella Daehn, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the C-i-ty Clerk. -2- CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN .City: City of Edina,. Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting:. A regular meeting, held on May 6, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 and 2 RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the City in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct . and complete transcript of the minutes.of a meeting of the City Council of;the City, and is a correct and complete copy of a resolution approved by the City.Council at said meeting; and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. .WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this ':6th, day of May., 1985. Marcella Daehn; City Clerk Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN;. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: 1. The Housing and Redevelopment-Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the ".HRA ")` and the Edina, City Council have previously approved -a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462..421,"subdivision 15, :designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to the Plan the`'HRA has acquired certain land in the area included in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement "). The Agreement provides for the execution of a consent by the City (the "Consent "). A form of the Consent is attached as an exhibit to the Agreement. A draft of the Agreement has been prepared and submitted-to the City and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk. 2. The form of the Consent is hereby.approved subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the city attorney and the City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor and City Manager are directed to execute the Consent upon execution of the Agreement by the HRA and the Foundation. The.Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. Attest: Dated this 6th day.of May, 1985. City Clerk Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. -2- MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 1, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of March 18, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney .Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly. Moti Executive Director 5 -3 -85 TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND HRA COMMISSIONERS .MEMBERS OF EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION (N.P.C.) RE: VILLAGES IN EDINA (formerly Edinborough) I. PLAN AND CONCEPT A. RESIDENTIAL: 1. 392 condos, 7 phases at 56 units per phase. 2. 80% moderate income buyers. Income Range $19,000 - $36,000. 3. Edina preference. 4. Underground parking. B. OFFICE: 1. Two buildings, two phases, 205,000 square feet (107,000 square feet in Phase I and 98,000 square feet in Phase II), some retail. 2. Surface and one level ramp parking (some for park use). C. ELDERLY: 1. 202 units, 18 stories, rental. 2. 20% low and moderate income. 3. Edina preference. 4. Restaurants for residents and for public. 5. Surface and underground parking. 6. Day care. D. PUBLIC PARK: 1. Approximately one acre covered; pool; running track; catering kitchen, performing amphitheatre. 2. Large meetings, e.g., Edinamite, Centennial events. 3. Heavily programmed; some user fees. II. PHASING OF CONSTRUCTION First: 1. 107,000 square feet of office. 2. 56 residential condos. 3. Park, utilities, parking (underground and surface and ramp). 4. Elderly. 5. Start 30 days; close and finish 24 months. Office 1. 98,000 square feet of office. Pfia II: 2. Start approximately three years after the start of the first phase. Second throu h 1. 56 residential per phase. Seventh on o- minium Phase: 2. Start second phase not later than two years after start of first phase; start later phases approxi- mately one year apart. The agreements (See VIII below) provide for sale and development of Phase I and give options to the Redeveloper to develop later phases. However, as to the condominiums, some aspects of later phases must be negotiated by the HRA, the Foundation and the Redeveloper before those phases can proceed. III. CONSTRUCTION A. Publicly bid all public improvements. B. Construction coordinator and manager for all public and private improvements - especially important as all of Phase I built simultaneously and office, elderly and park are physically tied. Hired by HRA and Redevelopers. C. Public Improvements: City: 1. Streets and utilities (paid by assessment). HRA: 2. Grading, park, parking for park (including a one -level parking ramp on Office Site), public walkways and court- yards, some utilities. (Paid by tax increment) IV. FINA!'t' INS A. OFFICE: 1. No public subsidy. Land pur&,_zse price to help residential buyers. 2. Public improvements assessed. 3. Land paid for at cost to HRA, plus all deferred taxes, plus interest. 4. Tax assessment agreement. B. ELDERLY: 1. $17,000,000 Housing Revenue Bonds. Repaid by owners of development. -2- C. RESIDENTIAL: 2. Interest reduction payment by the HRA of a maxi- mum of $170,000 per year for each of 20 years. Assists all elderly, especially low and moderate 20 %. Payments are non - recourse, except that they will be guaranteed up to $50,000 per year and $500,000 maxi- mum, by principals of Developer, to extent payments are from other than tax increments. 121% interest. To be repaid upon refinance,sale, or, if not sold, in installments from the 20th to the 40th year. HRA to be given a second mortgage on Elderly site to secure repayment. 3. Land paid for at cost to the HRA, plus all deferred taxes, plus interest. 4. City improvements assessed; HRA improvements to be paid for at closing. 5. To be syndicated to a limited partnership. 1. HRA to pay for land assessments for City improvements, and its own improvements on the residential site. HRA also agrees to pay construction period interest, up to $2,000 per unit, for condominium units. 2. All HRA payments and contributions will go into a pool. Part of the pool will go to reduce overall sales prices of units, and part will be used to fund second mortgages (at 5 interest) to the Foundation, repayable only upon sale of the unit. Second mortgages are only for low and moderate income buyers. 3. Example of use of pool money: (a) Unit Cost (b) Writedown (c) Sales price (d) Down payment (e) First mortgage (f) Slow 2nd mortgage (from N.P.C.) 1XII $85,000 (11,600) 73,400 3,700 70,000± 50,000 20,000 (a), (e) and (f) are all variable based on applicants income and size of unit. Money from second mortgage comes back to NPC for future use on project and, at end of project, throughout Edina. So- called Geri (Geriatric) plan. 4. Mn. Housing Finance Agency has already approved $2,000,000 for first mortgages. Due to time limits this has been released. A new application will be made. D. PARK 1. Construction - paid from tax increment. 2. Maintenance (no city money anticipated); Paid monthly. Elderly $15 per unit per month $ 36,000 /yr. Residential $ 5 per unit per month $ 23,500/6r. Office $.21 per sq. ft. per year $ 42,500/ r. 102,000/ yr. All tied to price index for increase. No decrease. User fees: Pool, track - some exceptions for residents of elderly over 62. V. TAX INCREMENT The projected increments have been reviewed for us by Coopers- Lybrand and appear favorable, even if only first phase built. VI. DEVELOPER AND PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS A. B. C. D. E. $920,000 Park Dedication - paid by HRA to City. $ 50,000 Paid to Foundation by Developer. $200,000 Initial payment for Phase I - paid by Developer to City (will total $335,000 if all phases built). $102,000 Park Maintenance - per year when all phases built. $975,500 To Foundation from Developer for Office Phase I, and Elderly land. VII. EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION (A Minnesota Non - Profit Corporation Section 501 (c) (3) status with IRS applied for) 5. members, 2 City appointed, 3 HRA appointed. -4- A substantial reserve is expected to develop and may be used for housing in other areas of Edina. VIII. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS A. HRA and East Edina Housing Foundation ( the "HRA Contract ") I. Phase I conveyed to Foundation. 2. Foundation commits to build the private improvements pursuant to approved plans. 3. HRA commits to build the HRA improvements pursuant to public bids, approved plans and with a guaranteed maximum cost. 4. City construct Public improvements pursuant to assessment procedure. 5. All construction plans, surveys, etc, are conditionally assigned to the HRA as security. 6. Payment and performance bonds required only to extent required by a first mortgage lender. 7. Private improvements to be fully insured by the developer; proceeds to be used to rebuild damaged improvements. Rebuilding requirements to continue until bonds are paid, except that reconstruction of condominiums to be controlled by state condominium law. 8. No assignments or transfers allowed without HRA approval except for leases in the normal course of business and sales of condominium units in the normal course of business. Also the Office and Elderly developments may be syndicated. If syndicated, the Developer, or principals approved by the HRA, must own at least 500/', of the general partnership interest and be the managing general partner. 9. If the Developer defaults, the HRA, among oth remedies, may suspend its performance, withhold Certificates of CoT :letion, and cancel and rescind the Agreement. 10. The Developer must comply with applicable laws as to non - discrimination, hours and wages. 11. The Agreement is terminable by either side if by December 31, 1985: (a) Housing revenue bonds are not issued; (b) tax increment bonds are not issued; (c) construction plans are not approved; (d) zoning or platting is not approved; -5- (e) closing contingencies are not removed; (f) financing is not obtained; or (g) title to the real estate is not marketable. 12. The Developer can exercise options for later phases of develop- ment if there is no default in the Agreement, and if various contingencies applicable to each phase are removed. The options are exercisable as follows: Office Phase II - within 36 months of the closing of Phase I; Condominium Phase II - within 24 months of the closing of Phase I; Condominium Phases III through VII - the option for Phase III must be exercised within 36 months of the closing of Phase I, and each subsequent phase option must be exercised within each period of 12 consecutive months thereafter. B, EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION AND THE EDINA PARTNERSHIP. 1. The Edina Partnership is comprised of: (a) York Edina Partnership, a general partnership comprised of Winfield Development, Inc., Laukka, Inc., and Jarvis, Inc.; (b) Henry Hyatt, Sheldon Baskin and Daniel Epstein; and (c) Thomas W. LaSalle. 2. The Edina Partnership cannot assign its rights without permission. Permission is given to assign its rights and obligations under the Acreement as follows: (a) The Elderly Housing Development to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation; (b) The Office Developments to the Edina Office Limited Partner- ships I and II, a Minnesota limited partnership; (c) The Condominium Developments to the Edina Townhouse Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership. 3. The Edina Partnership, and when assigned, the other developers, assume and agree to perform all of the obligations of the Foundation under the Agreement with the HRA. (All have been examined by Mr. Van Valkenburg for creditworthiness and reputation, and are recommended as developers.). ffffl 4. Each development stands on its own as to defaults and performance once assigned to the separate developers. 5. Defaults and remedies are essentially the same as in the HRA Contract. 6. Termination dates and events are essentially the same as in the HRA Contract. 7. The Developers can exercise their options for future phases pur- suant to the HRA Contract, except that for the condominiums additional negotiations and agreements are required as to amount of pool available, amount of writedown, unit costs and similar matters. 8. Condominium Development: (a) 80% of the units must be sold to buyers with adjusted gross income equal to or less than 110 of Median Family Income established by HUD for the Metropolitan Area. At present the Median Income is $32,800. (36,100 = 110 %). (b) The HRA determines the qualifying income parameters. (c) Price of units, write down from cost (provided with HRA funds), and the amount of second mortgages will be determined and agreed upon on a phase by phase basis. If NPC and Developer cannot agree, the NPC need not sell that phase. IX. OTHER AGREEMENTS A. Joint Easement Agreement. B. Assessment Agreement (Developers agree not to contest taxes to reduce below agreed upon amount until bonds are paid). C. Construction Management Agreement (for coordination of all private and public work; commitment to HRA that its improvements shall not exceed a stated maximum cost). D. Tax Increment Shortfall Guaranty (only for the interest reduction payments for the elderly; only for maximum of $50,000 per year and $500,000 aggregate). E. Joint Management Agreement (for operation of park and public and private improvements on the site). F. Origination and Servicing Agreement (with a bank, mortgage banker or like entity to help plan and service the NPC second mortgages). G. Construction Period Interest Agreement (HRA agrees to pay construction period interest on condominium units up to $2,000 per unit). d2 H. Interest Reduction Agreement (for the Elderly development). X. OFFICE PARKING RAMP HRA will build upper level of ramp, have rights to use that level and access to it; office developer will maintain ramp without cost to HRA or City. M LOCATION MAP T-4 73, UM 70 T N 3T_ CO RNELIjAk; -ELEk. SCH ROL PARK, LUTHERAN CHUFWL -FTH, 110 Ire OE J MASTER. z ST ..A Z_ 1vff 4_1 IT[ LOT.DiVISION NUMBER LD-85-3 L 0 C A T 10 N 7019-7021 Lynmar Lane Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT u 7� ..... ..... 73, UM 70 T N 3T_ CO RNELIjAk; -ELEk. SCH ROL PARK, LUTHERAN CHUFWL -FTH, 110 Ire OE J MASTER. z ST ..A Z_ 1vff 4_1 IT[ LOT.DiVISION NUMBER LD-85-3 L 0 C A T 10 N 7019-7021 Lynmar Lane Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT • j COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 1, 1985 LD -85 -3 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Generally located: East of Lynmar Lane and North of Mavelle Drive. Refer to: Attached survey The proponents are request a party -wall division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided. A non - conforming three -car garage is located on the southerly portion of the site. Recommendation: The proposed split satisfies all conditions for a party -wall subdivision established in the Zoning Ordinance. However, since all the garages will be located on one lot, garage access easements will be needed. Staff recommends approval of the division. CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343 CIRTIFICATE OF SUR Survey For: Book Page NORTH LANDSURVEYORS W Z J 0 z J 121 145 3o.Zo f,n I� I� 5v. 40 Duplex # -1O10E) m //75 N PrO�cao 3eG �..� ✓is�0r7 Line -� U\ 1� L So. 4.0 11� t� nGarcxee 0 N N m 5.1 M tr I hereby certify that this it a Irw and caned rearesentation of a survey of the boundaries of 1 �� — _' `' Tr''' ^,r Hennepin Covnty, Minnesota and of the iccation of all buildings thereon, and all .iubla encroacfimeny, if ony, Iron or on said load. 5vrnyed by the this , r n day of I,/C V — r y ". �"-' t�- e , 19 7. CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Q FGttl=)l rUK VUKl.,-1AJt W.- Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer .IA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 2, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Two full activated Traffic Control Signal Systems Turn Lane Construction Metro Blvd. at W. 70th & Metra Blvd. at Edina Industrial Blvd. Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See attached Tabulation 2. Department Recommendation: Ridgedale Electric $137,190.00 Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is / is not Public Works- Engineering Signatu Department within the amount budget for the purchase. . P1. en, finance Director City 1- t3fianer's Endorsement: 4/ 1. I concur with the reconynendation of the Department and reconunend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: �. .enneth R stand, City 1.1 eager � I BID TABULATION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONTRACT #85 -2 (ENG) TWO FULL ACTIVATED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS TURN LANE CONSTRUCTION - P.C.C. ISLANDS METRO BLVD. AND EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD. METRO BLVD. AND WEST 70TH STREET BID OPENI14G - THURSDAY, MAY 2, 1985 BIDDER TOTAL $137 190.00 t rs Inc. $141,340.00 $154,201.00 Hoffman Flprtric $154,662.75 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE:i�a Gnn nn RT?Q0T.1TTT0N WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested 'the.subdivision of said tract into:separate parcels.(herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: The North 47.3 feet, front and rear of Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and Lot 6_, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, except the North 47.3 feet, :.:....._: front and rear, of said Lot 6; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivison and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval .of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 198.4`. STATE OF.MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS . CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that -the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular. Meeting of May 6, 1985, and as recorded in the.Minutes.of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1985. City Clerk REQUEST FOR PURC! VISE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer .IA: Kenneth Rosland, City Nanaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 2, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Contract #85 -3 - School Parking'Lots - Arthur Street - W.. 492 Street Contract #85 -4 - Arneson Park - Playground Rings Quotations /Bids: , 3 C- Com any Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See attached tabulation 2. Department Recommendation: Bury &.Carlson., Inc. - (85 -3) - $138,607.68 Gunderson Bros. - 85 -4 - $ 34,366.00 Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not y, Public Works & Parks Si ture Department within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N, Dalen, Finance Director City Ma a"ner's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the reconrnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: /) nneth'Rosland, Ci? Manager r TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONTRACT #85 -3 AND #85 -4 (ENG) PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, PARKING LOTS SURFACING, PLAYGROUND RINGS AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO.'S - BA -263, P -14, P -15 & VARIOUS PARK PROJECTS BID OPENING - THURSDAY, MAY 2, 1985 - 11:00 A.M. BIDDER CONTRACT #85 -3 CONTRACT #85 -4 Bury &.Carlson, Inc. * ** $138,607.68 $42,618.80 Hardrives, Inc. $151,466.35 ---- - - - - -- Midwest Asphalt Corporation $154,998.78 $57,796.50 Gunderson Bros. ----- - - - - -- * ** $34,366.00 Standard Sidewalk ----- - - - - -- $41,502.50 Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc. ----- - - - - -- $46,395.70 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $131,227.50 $33,255.00 hLQUL31 1 -0I i'iii(uflt1 -)L TO:" Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes .A: Kenneth Ros1and, City Hanaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 6, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Weed harvesting of Mill Pond Quotations /Bids: Company 1• Midwest Aqua Care 2. NO OTHER BIDDERS 3. =.-,o Amount of Ouote or Bid $9,120.00 Department Recommendation: MIDWEST AQUA-CARE A • Si:gn to Department Finance Director's Endorsement: t . The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. Da en, Finance Director CitA�Maqer's Endorsement: . I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nneth posland, Cit l-lanager TO:" Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes !A: Kenneth Rosland, City tlanarer SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 6, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Weed harvesting of Mirror Lake Quotations /Bids: Com any 1. Midwest Aqua Care 2. NO OTHER BIDDERS 3. Amount of Quote or Bid $4,930.00 Department Recommendation: MIDWEST AQUA CARE Signa u epartment Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City M ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 0 . I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR FURCHAI L 7_�� r_ s� TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: John Wallin, Assistant Finance Director AA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 6, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): 1984 Chev Citation II, 4 door Hatchback Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid j. Iten Chevrolet, Brooklyn Center 8,194.00 2.. Harold Chevrolet, Bloomington 8,584.00 12, Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet, Buick 9,210.00 Department Recommendation: Iten Chevrolet for 8,194.00 Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not Finance Signature Department within the amount budget for the purchase. C J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City Ma ner's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE �F TO: Mayor and City Council 7ROM: Roger Laurence VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: 5/2/85 Material Description (General Specifications): Fire Department radio base station, antenna, feed line, filter, mini control console, and desk remote. Quotations/Bids- Company 1. General Communications, Inc. 2. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid - $ 12,247.00 $ 12,428.00 Department Recommendation: Both proposers have met the terms, conditions, and technical specifications detailed in the request for quotations. Therefore, it is recommended that the City accept the low quote provided by General Communications, Inc. FIRE DEPARTMENT Sionature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bird is .✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. I J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City Wager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nne'th Ros I and, (:I ty Manager f � M E M O R A N D U M DATE: February 27, 1985 TO: William Feck, Fire Chief _ Roger Laurence, Edina Police ti\ FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Assistant Chief \� SUBJECT: Radio "Down Time" - Fire Base Station - -- February 20, 1985 - During lightning activity in our area, and at approximately 1930 hours, we lost operation of our main base radio. V We transferred operations to the back -up unit (base), and remained operational. - -- February 21, 1985 - At approximately 0930 hours, General Communications arrived to repair base radio (main). At 1113 hours, General Communica- tions took the main base to their shop for repairs. During this period (2 -21 -85 @ 1113 hours to 2 -22 -85 @ 0910 hours), we were without main base communications. General Communications called the afternoon of 2 -21 -85 to advise the base radio was repaired and that they were keeping it overnight to monitor its operation and would return it to us by 2 -22 -85 @ 0900 hrs. - -- February 21, 1985 - (approximately 1700 hours) Police /Fire back -up radio was not transmitting properly, and we were without radio alert/ paging ability until 0910 hours on 2- 22 -85. - -- During the period of 22 hours, we had 17 emergency calls. - -- February 22, 1985 (0910 hours) - General Communications reinstalled main base. Back -up remains out of service due to non - avail.ability of parts. - -- February 22, 1985 - (approximately 1500 hours) - Roger Laurence installed a make -shift back -up unit, using a police field radio. TRP /ras REQUEST FOR PURCHASE_ TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE11 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 6, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Public Officials Liability Insurance Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Markel Service, Inc. $6,600.00 2. O'Rourke - Ossanna Agency $9,000.00 1. Department Recommendation: MARKEL SERVICE, INC. S i q n1 t e Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. Cl 1�) h 9zd�--� J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City Ma per's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. ^ 2. I recommend as an alternative: �1 4 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council 'ROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE11 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 6, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Police Professional Insurance Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Markel Service, Inc. (SEE ATTACHED) 2. Department Recommendation: MARKEL SERVICE, INC. . Amount of Quote or Bid $15,150.00 Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is s not within the amount budget for the P urchase. I� K � J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City aaer's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. _ 2. I recommend as an alternative: , nneth Rdsland, City Map'ager M E M O R A N D U M i. TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: POLICE PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE Ete—' DATE: May 6, 1985 We have gone out and sought bids for our Police Professional Insurance. The Police are currently covered under our General Liability Insurance with the Home Insurance Company. As of May 24, 1985, Home Insurance intends to discontinue that coverage. In an effort to find premiums that were reasonable for both the Police and the Public Officials Liability, it was necessary to quote both coverages together. The Markel Service was willing to write the Public Officials Liability as long as they could'also write the Police Professional Liability. Other companies that were solicited to submit bids did not want to write Public Officials Liability, or those who did quoted prices that were much higher than the premium quote we received from the Markel Service. Because of the difficulty in acquiring the Public Officials Liability, staff is recommending that we go forward with the quote with the Markel Service for the Police Professional Liability Insurance also. KR /sw 0 V�' -- - �\ AkOMEDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 April 26, 1985 Dear Resident: The Edina City Council on Monday, May 6, 1985 will consider releasing the property on the southwest corner of Lynn Avenue and Littel Street as a drainage easement and return the property to the State of Minnesota. A request has been made that the council consider releasing the lot (attached sketch). The purpose of this notice is to alert the residents near the lot that the State will probably put.the property up for sale to a private party if the council releases the lot. This will result in putting this property back on the tax rolls. The City is required to return the lot for private sale unless it determines that the lot should be kept for open space. Then, the City can request a change in classification which may or not be approved by State officials. . If you have any further questions, contact me at 927 -8861. Sincerely, Francis J. �O)ffmfop.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH:1m Enclosure: Sketch of lot SEGO. •400 a - c Scale feet .�L9 `99- y a 42 �. SiT- "V 79 �• �y3� IZ2' 100 200 , 2ao a 5o do 126 I I 1 z Z 1 `t `, �Iot W OD A o(�I 2s (g� (k� 1 2 0 51 2s (b1 l N � � 28 > ` s �z4� Gy OD 1 Ce�� I I Ck�,l I I (Apl 27 4— r {'Jj1 2T i 4 �Y '— 7 5 26 _5— : W `� 26 \�1 53i , ,p9 — —24 (45) 3 24 kk 2 6 ap7 T , 24 . (�L�i ? `^ Ck°�4 11(n�, a = - 2 ( 3 - -23_ a ( \��• Sl q � 3(%x% �b1� — — — uj ytil 2 2 9 'b 22 9 1�1: %O 5 �11� 11 O g 22 10 21 s o lOj ,�:4 60(o 6 .S% 4(`127 x , - - - 1- - - - - i _moo— (4, tis 20 e- 12 (. 4 _____ _ __ _ //ee qSl 3 Q �3 18 s MAR' IELD ' T t n(II 5( \ \�� 21 hV� 7 6 --21- r }— is IT _a a �bj �1°$8 Q •� S�v(11�s�o.� Ne `I o� - -20— o t1 v .moo � ° 2\.. 16 • � � l�5 rlo� Y �t — _20_ _ — T . B 421 -P� P z S: x•6.3 LITTLE -19dis - o — s 4 (1 18 (qA� C�� 9 5 . 18 I) -- 9 - -L T - -18— W_- - - -1 Cyst (• -- � 6 - - -- 10 o (qs� 1; .3 (�m� 10 _ - -1T (Gq� (S6) 1O w T - -IT —, •8 - 8 7 w-r -- V • -(- --9 16`(7 I6 (�' (�1 11' 15 3 a , : - ���� J :.. . ps4t ~ 12�15(g5� —�- 12-1- - -IS —' 3 13 1 13 (to? C _ _ 14 ( yq _ 1.9 o. 14/ �� �ql� i J3 -` !� 14 1�� i -�`� 2001 ' `lq i 120 40 0 / I It .'� 4d g19,�L3 B 2D0 20 200 W.by ,WiiA . MORNINGSIDE • ., .,- K 2 �, too :1 I • . Li Rt �r 2,6 200-.. _ - 0 = 20 400 Q feet scale d f• �yh1 It2� 20, --ST zoo ,{ ; 2s 1 I 2 1 :.' s. a lttdl Ij0 NW 2$ ,t � (g� (2 1 Zs 0 25 k 2 0 0 128 _ 1 , o I � I �� I l �27 a k3\ 27 N _ OD ' l Cy 2s 5_ _ w C� Zs (\�l s _ d3' III ;r1 ' i X09 —24 �� ��Sl 3 — - — 2a 2 s _: a 1a 2s ,rj. o \ ( \0'1 _ q07 7 24 • (1�� ? (kA - 11 . 1 2 — — _ -- — — a — — 23 r` ��►23 . X47 a - -23— -R 5ti122 9 'L 22 9 \�1. �osi 5 l�l� "� (\ 787 t��7� 5 2 21 p3 10 , 21 t , ! 9.-. 4 w 22 ( : Q Pzo ..1 (� s S! e \\ Q to kSl 12 3 (�+ 19 MAR' ELO (� T g 1 a 1 14 O (f%' 17 A z 1 ze15� 4o dCZ\rzd16 : .'sa3. - 130 �.. y �-�, _20_ — — �7 `Z1� —20- 421/2 ST vwo ,, LITTLE .gT (`l �5 (. rat t �t.:. - L a i 1 e 40 a JUVg �zcR `A to 2 0 l p P N z6 r sy l C 7 r - -18— 1 12 G 19 . S 4 , 18 Cq ��� 18 S `3 + Z15. w - - -- • Cy �20 i — -Il p z 5 0 s � - - -- 10 - - + - -17- o. t. 1O (A 1; 3 �11 10 _ —17- .4 (S61 to - °(\ w 1� I.z X23 _ 0 8 8 &) Z ✓ -25' 7 5d 75 G 1 10 l6 (� J 26 'y 1 g Q 0) (6) `S0� 27 h [.1 1•- - 15 S� - -12 - - ---15 ` �yo s4 ~0 12 c j 13 14 4 q2� ao �� I Q z o 200 �°(� o s: Co 6(, t it 4a glgtz9 •� 2DO 6r nor:. 3�.�3i o - ' ' • (� 4 4 MORNINGSIDE , �o I ff• � 14t. .1 r• . 'oo •i la� i� l` ca _ 2 :s1 A''lilryl � We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City Council: 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park V 5 property. Signature Add_ Tess C CL c-42 -&_. da • ` \� We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City Council: l. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. SY nature �xAm�I /K�AV� W2 � '� � AA ' Address \ 6 l -,7 IA - — We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Council: �C I Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. Signature Address y2 6-� -� y2 We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Llttel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. [omncYl: Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City l. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park Signature ytj Address *7 - ` C� U Z � /\ W ' ~ (- v / A `.. ' / ut We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Council: Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. Sign_atWe z iz,/z r J) cent Q G Address T q Cr (Pv, 'p) 14— ' / Y Z a 5 Qt( mcs /-- . f Uzi 3 3 We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Council: Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. Signature /W)A4 J "Address �,2 -V�- zz-f-� n `f�3� Crocks -� Z�: , �,�( U e,rC�� /Ivy /yvIII We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City Council: 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park prop y- v a�� ��rol Signature " Address 4�)45 �C,2 Don iOTA� Lj X233 We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City Council: 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. 012 E .Address Ll -)(C X�c %r ki 4 L+ o 1-;�r / IiL J J ll \ �f3 0��� ► 121 0 We, the undersigned, desire that the property located on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be maintained in its present natural state. Council: Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City 1. Deny permission for any development of this property, part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as "Quasi Public;" and 2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park property. Signature f ' 1 Orj zkl, lq 1(5 Address (wse . 5-o . y z 3 ` ,cykA L.ISV yzz7d AM ave. So, ya 33 Lr�►.,►ti a A, f . �O . 1' X-- - ilZ ;3 Z L /I/1-e �o . x-20 I Gnu A,e- . -ra CJ [ Iz -- -- - -- - - - - - -- -- --------------------- `f-i"-7 -k./ 64?n-d -Bit 101: a__ A 4 � �&I- -4 -'4- --- ! . - 4 vc-_ - V9AIJ AJOWL 4U-E - RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Village of Morningside (by annexation now City of Edina) on August 6, 1943 received a conveyance of tax forfeited lands from the State of Minnesota, conveying to it for drainage purposes a tract of land described as follows: Lot eight (8), Block three (3), Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the Village of Morningside; and WHEREAS, the above described property is no longer needed for drainage purposes but is desired by the City for open space purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation, to change the use of the land above described from drainage purposes to open space purposes. ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of: May 6, 1985,: and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 13th day of June,..1985. City Clerk R F. R(1T.TTT T0X WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided plans and specifications for the improve- ment of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 and seeks the approval thereof; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed improvement Hennepin County has agreed to construct a guard rail adjacent to the Murphy and Stang homes; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to purchase from the City any right of way if needed for the proposed project and to provide $3,000 for use for City roadways; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans for the improvement of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 be and are hereby approved, subject to an exchange of easements between the City and Hennepin County as necessary. ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 11th day of December, 1985. City Clerk i6DINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, there currently exists in.the area of France Avenue and Interstate Highway 494 traffic congestion at peak hours; and WHEREAS, the proposed Homart office - hotel development is to be developed on the Edina side of 494; and WHEREAS, the Homart development would be three times as intense as a similar development in.Edina; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would negatively impact people living and working in the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, BE -IT RESOLVED that the Community Development and Planning Commission recommends to the.City Council that all appropriate steps be taken to.effect a reduction in the intensity of this.proposed development. �IEF M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS DATE: May 6, 1985 The renewals for the various insurance coverages (with the exception of Public Officials Liability -and Police Professional Liability) will be due July 1, 1985. I am bringing this to your attention now in order to let you know that it appears that our premiums are going to be going up dramatically. Briefly, the way we have been purchasing insurance over the past eight years or so is as follows: Every three years staff would develop specifications and take bids for the various coverages. The last year we took bids was in 1983. Under this practice, the various agents were awarded the bids for three years with the provision that if the City is not satisfied with the premium the agents are able to provide, the City has the option to seek quotations for premiums on its own. It has been our experience that the agents have always been able to provide very good rates and in the most recent years, outstanding rates. (See attached; the premiums indicated are net, and dividends have been subtracted from the amounts shown.) This year, we are going to experience some major changes in the premiums the City is going to have to pay. The key reason for this turn of events is primarily due to a total economic upheaval in the insurance industry, due to lower interest rates and that dramatic rise in the cost of reinsurance. At the time of higher interest rates, insurance companies were able to subsidize their premiums with the returns on their investments. During that period, companies became very competitive with their premiums. Insurance companies now in an effort to protect their reserves are raising the premiums, or are not taking on new accounts, and in some cases are dropping various coverages altogether. Staff has been working on our renewals since the end of February. They are coming to the conclusion that we can expect most of our premiums to return to the rates similar to those in 1979 (see attached). In other words, we expect that at a minimum, premiums will double and in some instances triple. May 6, 1985 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Two On a more positive note, our experience record in regard to most of our coverage is excellent, and this will hopefully work in our favor in acquiring the most favorable rates possible. I will keep you updated as information is available. KR /sw General Liability Liquor Liability SUBTOTAL /Liability Workers Compensation Auto Liability ---------------- - - - - -- Property Voting Machines Fine Arts Money & Securities Mobile Equipment SUBTOTAL /Property Ambulance Malpractice Boiler Machinery Umbrella e 1979 -80 106,109 143,723 24,390 -------- - - - - -- 20,455 549 1,400 (See Liability) 22,404 (27,000)* 1,125 4,677 41,200 (3M) INSURANCE PREMIUM PERFORMANCE 1979 -1985 (est.) NET PAID 1980 -81 1981 -82 1982 -83 - - 53,498 - - 15,382 57,747 74,592 68,880 164,549 159,606 156,702 11,707 --------------------------------------------------------- 14,110 14,198 13,954 15,763 16,378 549 247 247 - 8 8 1,134 1,134 1,134 (See Liability) (See Liability) (See Liability) 15,637 17,152 17,787 (20,600)* (22,150)* (22,800)* 900 900 900 4,500 4,500 4,500 19,271 12,075 12,075 (3M) (3M) (3M) *APPROXIMATE PROPERTY SUBTOTAL IF MOBILE EQUIPMENT INCLUDED. 1983 -84 35,153 6,512 41,665 81,500 11,954 9,541 247 1,298 2,096 13,190 900 4,540 6,000 (5M) Revised 8/01/84 1984 -85 est. 37,965 6,512 44,477 105,443(est 13,000 13,794 266 6 1,301 2,096 17,463 900 4,600 7,500 (5M) J 1985 -fTY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -Db-85 PAGE 1 CHECK-- N0.._,pATE — AB OU-IyT v =NDOct TTFm OESCRTPTIoN n.C.C- WA- NO "N- VA- "- .D"-MF-SSAG - I' I; 123502 04/24/85 167.76 SUBURBWN CHEVROLET PARTS 10-4620-560-56 , �, - -- - -- - -- _ - -_— - -- 16!+76 • GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 I <_ .iG� •*fr :• 18 + *** —CKS •ffrrr —• 1260U3— 04/23/85 16.35 ALBINSON GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 126017 B 528.60 126003 04/23185 10.25 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTING 10 -4570- 260 -26 04/22/85 14�p7.p20 '� 1 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 • 12 I' 126004 0.5/01/85 7095 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 ',- - -• - - -- --- _----------- --- - -- _7.•95_! �_ I,a sn * ** —CKS 5� rrfrrf 126U26 04/30/85 19348.36 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 10 **+ —CKS o I" 12600/ 0.510.1./85 22.00 APEX PEIST CONTROL GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 — — l 22.30 + '. j24 126008 U4/22/85 10307 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 70 12600.8 04/22/85 117.53 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 P- 12 60 28 04/23/85 216.35 BEER VH�OIcSALERS INVENTORY 27 -4630- 664 -66 216.35 * 126309 05/01/E5 47968 ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126029 47 + BERG & FARNHAM CO II, J t'j 258.70 * GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301.30 71 !2 I4 -I • +•f•• • * ' ,4 CKS • — �„ 3' *•• —CKS 13:. ..1260.33 - -.. __. -04/ 241.85__- 116012 04/23/85 24.95 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 24.95 * 3 126013 04/24/85 131.04 ALTEIRAT02 REBUILD GEM SUPPLIES °10- 4504 - 328 -30 126013 0.4/24/85 53.86 ALTEINAITOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 I <_ 18 + •ffrrr —• 41 *f* —CKS <; 126017 04/22/85 528.60 ALLIED PL4STICS GEM SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 I<i; :I I 126717 04/22/85 14�p7.p20 ALLIED PLASTICS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 f•f f.f sn * ** —CKS 5� 126U26 04/30/85 19348.36 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40 -1220- 000 -00 h I" 126026 04/23185 251.72 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 807 -80 I *•+ -CKS 6J �1. P- 12 60 28 04/23/85 216.35 BEER VH�OIcSALERS INVENTORY 27 -4630- 664 -66 216.35 * ar• a7 - 126029 04/22/85 258970 BERG & FARNHAM CO t'j 258.70 * GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301.30 71 !2 I4 -I • +•f•• • * ' ,4 CKS • — �„ v ..1260.33 - -.. __. -04/ 241.85__- _.76.95— ____BIR.GF_ORO._TRUC KIM G. .— .1JNWEN.T_DR.Y 50_A626- B22- 82 —_ —_ •I 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 126033 04/19/85 116U33 C4/24/85 116U33 U4/19/85 116J33 ']4/24/85 126U33 __ __ _0_4/19/95 CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 2 _- AMOUNT_ ____ - _VENDOR. -_..., _ ITEM DE SCR PTION ACCON_NT NUS _.INY.- p_P.O.._p_11.E.SSAGE___ 112.05 BERG --ORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 I; 29535.70 103.95 B�P.GFORO TgUCKTYG - INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84,- 27- 1300 - 000 -00 , 139.50 BERG=3RO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 ' _IN 205.16 BEP,GFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86 �0 BRAUN _ -_- -- 91._35 BERG =ORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 86286 PHOTO SUPPLIES • 126037 729.86 f- 915.15 BRAUN ENG - -- -- - -- - ^IB CONST COST _ 126U34 _ -U,5 /01/85_,_ -__ _____ 12 .34 __BL00'LI.N6T04-CHRY -RLY -gEDRLR_pARTS 12.04 f f f f f i ' ,I 116031 0.4/19/85 29535.70 BRAUN EVG TESTING IN CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 126C46 126037 05/!]1/85.__- _9,594.14. -_ - BRAUN.ENG 10- 4504- 600 -60 TESTING _IN CONST. -COST - - -- - - - - -- -- -23,30 • 116U37 U5/01/85 69921 *70 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONST COST 60 -1270- 000 -00 z' PHOTO SUPPLIES • 126037 05/01/85 915.15 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONST COST 60 -1300- 370 -01 Ia_ •i 126048 04/23/85 274.42 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 • 4 ___.126U48 • fiftfi 126041 04/24185 844.23 BURY 4 CARLSON INC • 126U41 04/19/85 257.35 BJRV B CARLSON INC "i 126041 _ _ 04/24/85_ - - -_ 97.65 BURY g CAILS,ONINC 1*198.93 BLACKTOP BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 10-4524-301-30 1. ­. - -.. - - -- * **-CKS I"I. nlflf }IYI� •' ' ,I 12SU53 05/01/85 123975 BROWNING FERRIS S� 10 -4250- 301 -30 • 126C46 05 /01 /85 20.00 BLUMBERPG PHOTO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 600 -60 11SU53 ------ - - - -- - - - - -- -- -23,30 • - REFUSE COLLECTION �, •''i • ! 126U41 U4/19/85 11.55 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10.450$- 440 -44 I "i 126053 U5 /C1_ /85_ -_ - _60.00 11.55 * FERRIS_ REFUSE C- CLLE ' •i 126048 04/23/85 274.42 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 • 4 ___.126U48 04/19/858.96 _ BRISSMA'N KEN OT INC CL DA IES 10 -412M52,0- 52 1260.53 05/01/95 11.76_ 263.38 + FERRIS -_ - _REFUSc COLLECTION - - -- - -;nil • 126049 - _04/26185 _ _ _____72.25__ - --B URES_H__RDBER_T___ MEE -TANG .]0 4206- 4.40_44. 72.25 • 0 I; I; a: • " 12SU53 05/01/85 123975 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 301 -30 _. 126053 05/01/85 12.52. BROWNING_fERRIS - _REFUSE - COLLECTION 10 -4250- 446 -44 11SU53 05/01/85 66.26 BROWNINS FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250- 520 -52 •''i 126353 05/71/85 123.75 BP.OWYING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 540 -54 126053 U5 /C1_ /85_ -_ - _60.00 R30WNT.'VG FERRIS_ REFUSE C- CLLE 10 -4250- -62. 126053 05/01/85 136.12 BROWNTNG FERRIS -CT-ION REFUSE COLLECTION .628 _ 10- 4250 - 646 -64 • 12SC53 05/U1/85 60*74 BROWNIN3 FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250- 646 -64 1260.53 05/01/95 11.76_ BROWNING_ FERRIS -_ - _REFUSc COLLECTION 23- 4250 - 610 -61 126053 05/01/85 257.25 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTION 27- 4250 - 661 -66 • 126053 05/01/85 75.12 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTION 27- 4250 - 662 -66 _._7260_53 05- /01_/85 123.75- BROWNING FERRIS R_EFUS-C_COLLE.CT.ION 29- 42-50- 708 -70 126U53 C5/(11/85 196.11 BROWNIN3 FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 50 4250 841"84 • 126053 05/01/85 321 *16 PROWNTOG FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 50.4250.861 -86 • 0 I; I; a: vomn ., m� coIwA cwccu '-oIsrEm os-V,~u, pwnc n / --_cHcCn_mn Vo zmnup°oo�nca i � | �| vvnam.z9 " |" � . | vamos* o*/az/xn ay"no exrrcan ukncwnusc pxmro 10~4620~560~56 ` |`| 23°90 ° °°°~cno ' .1260*u - 04/2 4/85 7~4624~664~66_-__-'_'-_' .. 126060 . vaaoou ^^°°°° 04xe5/85 100.18 wMoxouAm01 yxuuxsc cmwccaoImma 27~4624~66*~66 0.4/30/85 on*°ro ^nexaomooa oxuoxsc unmccauzpmo 27~4624~664~66 ` a6u62 04v24/85 126062 04 12 2 vo5 -_-lzaoao-___-V4-/.4.o/-wn | °^^~Cna | --- -^ 62.80 . enocu WHITE GEm muPpLzcm 10~450*-301'30 �] oon°oo enncn unzrc mcm ouppLIcn 40~450*~801~80 __6a°o !, . -°°^~cnm' l ^| ^. 1e6u7u o*ve3x85 41 *86 cwm'uum r4-rnno mcm ourpLzco 40~4504~80 3~80 �l- __-1o6or� � ' 128°74 ° -----� ' --^°°°°° --------------------' --- _--'`_�-_^��~�n� '/ i-� 12607* 0*v19v85 1996*0900 1-9-960-O.D. Czry or nLmonzwmrmx CnmY wcnn 10~4200~480~48 / ^ °°°~cnm . vaunvn u*/23v85 27*.85 rncx cmLx onrvLzms unmccmozmmo 27~4624~66*~66 i �� n�n _] u c4v23v85 105°60 ooc* cmLx emrTLzmo cnmocomzumm 28~4*24~704~70 | | / 1260,r9 04/23v85 *o°om cArco pxmnu 10~4*20~560~56 ! --- ---' ' . - -_ --_ -___---- ~~~~CpS ' 126082 0.*/24/85 3*°c5 CONWAY rzlc u oxpETx Comv mcmw�� ' -� / i — 34.25 ° ° | --_'---_ ----� °°°~zum ! � .---1260 85 32.3 � !| � � _,u6u86-___-0-4/-1 _°o�_--_-__raomnzzaOMo-SuppLY-- m--___acp-Um 3~00 0~0 0__---_--__'-_-__ ` 126086 u4x�pvun 1*°00 cnomarmonu ouppLv co ncrumo MccH pcmnsr 10~3130~000~00 — ` 1m ° sm ° |, r _. � 1985 CITY OF EDINA �7I , w r - -- AMOUNT-_ 160.30 - -- -- _ 51 . 58 67.35 328.11 239.54 22.50. 297.10 44.P4 - -- - - -- _ 22.50 - 731.40 * 126194 04/23/85 62.62 62.62 + 126114 04/24/85 - - - -- - 33.18 - 33.18 i CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 4 ra -_- VENDOR R�LP�iON AC.C�U11T�10•_1NV.•- q_P•.0•__p_ _ CHECK _N0.. -DATE e., 126UYU Q4/22/85 362.50 126U9(l U4/22/85_ CLEANING SUPPLIES 12609U U.4/22/85 _C.4/30 /85- - -- CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 126091 -- 04/23/85 - �, 126091 0.4/23/85 REP_AIR- QAR_T_S 116U 91 Q4/23/85 10- 4620 - 560 -56 126091 0.4/19/85 REPAIR PARTS 126U91 04/23/95 PARTS _ 126091 _._ _Q4/23/85- �7I , w r - -- AMOUNT-_ 160.30 - -- -- _ 51 . 58 67.35 328.11 239.54 22.50. 297.10 44.P4 - -- - - -- _ 22.50 - 731.40 * 126194 04/23/85 62.62 62.62 + 126114 04/24/85 - - - -- - 33.18 - 33.18 i CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 4 ra -_- 126120 0,4/24/85 79421 .49_ -_ DQRSEY_8 _WHITNEY- _PRO__ -SERV 10 -2010- 000- 00_____ 1261 Z 04/24/85 29042.54 DORSEY B WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 126120 04/24/85 59112.61 DORSEY 4 WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ;;a: -- - - - - - - -- - 14576.64 **+-CKS - 126125 VENDOR R�LP�iON AC.C�U11T�10•_1NV.•- q_P•.0•__p_ MESSAGE__. -�_, GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 r ; 126125 05/01/85 362.50 MERIT SUFPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540 -54 12 _C.4/30 /85- - -- CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 �, 126125 CERT POWER __TRAIN__-- _- REP_AIR- QAR_T_S 10 -4540- 560- 56- __.- ______.___.____. I< 10- 4620 - 560 -56 CERT ?DYER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 ;5 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 126125 _ 04/26/85 _- 814.59 I� ' _GEN SUPP_LiES _27 -4504- 661 -66 126125 U.4/30/85 ,, to ` SUP-7LY TRASH CANS 27- 4602- 662 -66 r I 04/24/85198.70 69286.94 + CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 520 -52 �t CTTY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 540 -54 - CITY_ F EDINA __-- ___ - -_- WATER_ 27- 4258 - 646 -64 CITY OF EDINA RUBBISH REMOVAL 50 -4250- 821 -82 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50 -4258- 821 -82 r 126143 ___CITY S1F_E11NA,__ - - -- -WATER BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 - - -- - -- . ... - - - - - - - -- - -- - - -- I19 s * * -CKS ; - -- -- - - - -- CASH -- REGISTER SALES GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 �- - +++ -CKS DELEGARD TOOL CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 - ----- -- * * +- CKS - 126120 0,4/24/85 79421 .49_ -_ DQRSEY_8 _WHITNEY- _PRO__ -SERV 10 -2010- 000- 00_____ 1261 Z 04/24/85 29042.54 DORSEY B WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 126120 04/24/85 59112.61 DORSEY 4 WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ;;a: -- - - - - - - -- - 14576.64 **+-CKS - 126125 05/01/85 19206.60 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 r ; 126125 05/01/85 362.50 MERIT SUFPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540 -54 126125.,-- __- _C.4/30 /85- - -- 39346.00_ MERIT SUP ?.LT FERTIZER LI 10- 4558 - 642 -64. 126125 05/01/85 437.25 MERIT SUFPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 rr 126125 44 /Z 4/85 78.00 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 126125 _ 04/26/85 _- 814.59 _MERI'T_�UPPL7__ 10- 4542 - 325 -30 _GEN SUPP_LiES _27 -4504- 661 -66 126125 U.4/30/85 42.00 MERIT SUP-7LY TRASH CANS 27- 4602- 662 -66 r I 04/24/85198.70 69286.94 + EA_P.�_F _A�VD.ERSE�! PARTS 10�4.b.20r .560 -56 r i �ry1 I ,.I + ++ -CKS 1- 1 4 126126 05/01/85 924.00 OAVIS EUGENE WEED CONTROL 60- 4100 - 985 -90 r 126126 05/01/85 51.16 DAVIS EUGENE MLILEAGE 60 -4208- 985 -90 - -- -- - - - --- - - - - -- - - - -- -- 9.75 .0 6._ I ififf* 126136 74/24/85 115.00- EARL F ANDERSEN CREDIT 10- 4542 - 325 -30 r 126136 04/24/85 85.00 EARL F A;N3ERSEN SIGNS b POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 126136 -_ 04/24/85198.70 - EA_P.�_F _A�VD.ERSE�! PARTS 10�4.b.20r .560 -56 168.00 r u+f *• r 126143 Q4/24/85 118.62 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 r i �ry1 I ,.I + ++ -CKS 1- 1 4 '`i rrrrrr *-CK S- ----12 �61.8 3. 5 tOt/-R 5 ___L*23 GIVENS IN- Fm --ti PPI T r4z 1985 Y OF ED INA 7.23 CHECK ISTER ;-j 05-01-, PAGE 5 126194 04/26/85 155.73 GENERAL C3MMUNICATNS RAOI3 SERV 10-4294-420-42 L_`i --. CHECK. -Nae-DATE__ —..--.-kMLIU-NT- 05/G1/85 _VZA.00.3 TTEM-DES-C IPTION —ACCOU NT—NO - __INV.-l_ Pe Oo --- I-MESSAGE 558.94 126143 0,4/26/85 112.26 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66 2 *►CKS 126148 0,4/22/85 26.30 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-449-44 126148 04/22/85 11080 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-449-44 rrrrrr ***-CKS 126153 0,4/23/85 16.93 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 16.93 126154 04/30/85 504.60 JOE ELPAS WAGES 27-4100-663-66 126154 C4/24/85 217.57_ JOE ELLAS WAGES 27-4100-663-66 I tar -CKS L 126157 04/19/85 59700.30 50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN RUBBISH BILLING 10- 4200 - 395 -30 5,700.00 rrr -CKS _j 1261 62..-------0412,3./-8-5-----36l-o37 FOWLR ELEC.TRIC —REP-AIR PARTS Y0- 4540560 -56 ____ 361.37 • 126164 04/23/85 19.66 FREEWAY 03DGE INC PARTS 10-4620-560-56 1 1261 FREElA LD .On F' T r PARTS 10- 4620x5. 60_ 5 -6 ----------rwrrf 22.56 �d�1 126167 04/19/85 29635*30 FIRST NATIONAL BANK INTEREST BONDS 27- 4300 - 660 -66 I. rrrrrr -CKS 126176 05/01/85 749.00 G*L*CONTR%CTING INC CONT SERV 10-4200-345-30 749.00 '`i rrrrrr *-CK S- ----12 �61.8 3. 5 tOt/-R 5 ___L*23 GIVENS IN- Fm --ti PPI T r4z 7.23 ;-j 126194 04/26/85 155.73 GENERAL C3MMUNICATNS RAOI3 SERV 10-4294-420-42 L_`i EDEA AL_CO.4MU.NI_CAT_NS RADIn sFRY l0r4_294mT_4A0-t44. 126194 05/G1/85 25o71 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 558.94 ***-CKS Izz *-CK S- ILI 171 1995 CITY OF EDINA CHECK ,NO.__OATE ___. r 1 f i r r 12 61 99 126199 s. a,. a. v %P CHECK PEGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 6 r AMOUNT VENDOR- - ITEM DESCRIPTION AC(<O1.LNL N0o 1NV..- p__P..O+_ -p MESSAGE -- --- -- --------------- - - - - -! i r -CKS _ i "_ 04/24/85 16.38 G T PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 �a a T ?ARTS REPAIR PARTS 10.4540 Is 21.70 Ic 126203 04/19/85 126203 - U4/19/85 126273 04/19/85 126203 04/19/85 126203 04/19/85._ 126203 C4/19/85 126203 04/19/85 1262U3 04/19/85 126203 U.4/19/85- 1262J3 C4/19/a5 126203 _ 04/19/85_ 126203 04/19/85 126203 04/19/85 1262U3 -- U4/19/85_ -_ _ - - 126203 04/19/85 1262U3 04/19/85 126203. U- 4/_19/85________ - - -___ r 1262U6 J4/19/85 429.40 G 8 K SERVICES - - - -- - - CKS-- !1] - - -- - -. -- - J 126206 04119/85.- 3.90 G_- &- K_SERVICES __- _.LAUNDRY .I IIS 16.70 LESLIE MARTIN MEETING EXPENSES 10 -4206- 160 -16 10- 4262 - 560 -56 CREDIT .70LESLIE 04/19/85 - MARTIN_. - -__ ____. -_- PARKING -- 10- 4206 - 420- 42___. 10- 4262 - 646 -64 <11� REPAIR PARTS 7.70 LESLIE MAP.TIN PARKING 10- 4206 - 422 -42 40_262- 801 -80 __._______- __-- ._ -___ REPAIR PARTS 21.39 LESLIE MARTIN MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4208 - 160 -16 PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1.75 _ -- __LESLIE - MAR TIN___- --- ---, -- PARKING- -- 10- 4208- 260- 26...- -_._.. _ -- REPAI-R-RARTS 2.76 LESLIE MARTIN MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 510 -51 PARTS TOOLS 20.90 LESLIE MARTIN PROF SERV 10- 4224 - 420 -42 �,]I PARTS 8.36_ LESLIE MARTIN POST 10- 4290- 160- 16_- -_- 10.75 LESLIE MARTIN -AGE LIC TABS __-- ______- 10- 4310 - 600 -60 ________'�^ 'Z 1.31 LESLIE MARTIN GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 120 -12 • _ 8.18 _.LESLIE_ MART INGEN _SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420- 42__ -_ - - -_ 4.65 LESLIE MARTIN GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 422 -42 31.99 LESLIE MARTIN GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 805 -80 I, v - 2.78 ^ LESLIE MARTIN PHOTO SUPPLIES 1.0- 4508- 120- 12_�______- _.____�___; 2.32 LESLIE MARTIN PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 421 -42 ' 13.95 LESLIE MARTIN PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 422 -42 i,,'; 38.06.- L�SLIE_.hgRTIN___ -] P_}1�TO -PUPLIES 10-4508- 560 -56___ 191.95 7 r 1262U6 J4/19/85 429.40 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY '10 -4262- 301 -30 , 126206 04119/85.- 3.90 G_- &- K_SERVICES __- _.LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52 126206 04/19/95 373.37 G B K SERdlCES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 CREDIT ` 126206 04/19/85 252.75 G B K SEPVTCES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 <11� REPAIR PARTS 126206J4/19/85 ________j .•I� 545.40 ,(_8_�- SE_RYyCES _LAU.NJZfti 40_262- 801 -80 __._______- __-- ._ -___ REPAIR PARTS 10 -6540- 560 -56 1 9674.82 110.42 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS i r ' b 126 209 1262U9 126 209 126209 126 209 126209 126209 •d � /rrrii 0 0.5/01/85 u.5/J1/85_ 44%24/85 J4/22/85 _ (14/24/85 u4/24/85 0.5/U.1/85 126213 05/0.1/85 483.00 LEROY H LIBBY SERVICES 40- 4200 - 800 -80 480.30 + HALLMAN LU.BRiCANTS 10- 461.8 - 5.60 -56 rii -CKS + ++ -CKS ,I% 'I\ CKS:... 37.31- GENUINE PARTS CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 __ 75.32 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56_ _-- ________j .•I� 145.92 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -6540- 560 -56 110.42 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - -� __.24.32 GENUINE_PA.RTS REPAI-R-RARTS 10- 4540 - 560- 56-____ ^ ----- --- ---- 49.98 GENUINE PARTS TOOLS 10- 4580- 301 -30 268.75 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 637.40 ! B< 126213 05/0.1/85 483.00 LEROY H LIBBY SERVICES 40- 4200 - 800 -80 480.30 + HALLMAN LU.BRiCANTS 10- 461.8 - 5.60 -56 rii -CKS + ++ -CKS ,I% - . . 1985 , OF cozmA cxccK -JznTER 05~01~" pAsc r c*ccn m�._oxrc --__._--_- _x�wmmT«� mo°-zmV.-w'p°o.'w MESSAGE__.- 12621 o4/23m5 19390.36 n«LLnvw LomnIoxmTn 10-4618-56 0-56 � --'--__ - 2 9161°36 _°_____________________ °^°~cno / |' mozzn ' --U4^19/85' ---------- 105.76 . ---- *zLLSraun uuro oop ------ v sox yuppLIco ----------- ----'- - 10~4504~646~64 --- ' - 'i . 126228 nwvvros 19646°56 ozLLsrnmn ^uru oop r RcpAzn pxnvm 10~4540~560~56 vzoozn o4x19e5 _- 1*°10~ _-__- *zLLsrno* xuro oop v --cncn 10~45*0~560~56 ) 12622u o*/19/85 955.54 nzLLxrxuw ^urc nop v nxn7o -1n~4ea0~5ao~so - a6228 u4/19/85 vos°an *ILLarxun « uro nop v PAR TS ap~«soo-aaz~aa ' 126e28 04m4/95 59. 63 --__ nILLornum xwrn aop r_ �o"vza-p»n --*cp'zm 27~45 40~662~6 6 126228 05/01/Q5 63°44 nzLLSrnmw ourn oop v px--n zr~45*V~66a~ae---' 1e6226 o4m9x85 113.22 xILLSrnon xuro oup n PARTS 27~*620~662~66 ' 126228 04m9r85 - ox"on _--__-*I LLyrnmm.uuro.mup.n_-_.comz-ace�zno___-____'__�a�oa4a_n�r~�o ---- '| 39116"91 ° -- | ----------------- ------- ---'------'- -- -°^°-Cmo 12623u 0*v19x85 21 *95 worF uzLLmmuow sEm ouppLzco 10~4504~420~42 | 12623u 04v2*v85 -w.os'-_--_--nopc_uzLLIxmanw_-_--- se��u�e�� 63.30 ° ' -' -- '-- --- ---------'- -------- ------- -- ----------- ' °°^~cwo ! 126236 o*/znvuo on°au wreomrzsLmo ncpxsn pxn7o 10~4540~520~52 ! 2 5°2 4 °____- -__' --- --------- ------^----^- ''^ °°°~cno � 1262*8 o*/ao/mx 40 .90 , *wnnom smas no"xzm p�n7m 1�����--------'--- -- ' ���oaO-�a - - - / 40.90 ° °°^-cxs . I.? 6,e 5o z^vzov e » _ ___' Er xxozxrom_'____'znmr_uE�xzn . vo~*aom~o60~oa | 126253 05v01 /on 2*.50 nuppwxcn nxnzorux cmwr ncpxrno � --�' 10~42*8~560~56 ' 126253 05/01/85 ax°so xowp4mcz yoozxrnx cuwr xcpAzno 18~42 48~560~5e -noo.u(l° --' --------- ---' - ^°°~cwn | 126267 - - '--'-- 04 /23185 —' -- '- -------- 532925 --- -- --' - ISM compup*rIom comzp mxzmr `------�,o���---- - --- 1 soa°zs ° ' °°°~cn3 / 126270, - n���Y��s --------n1°*5 000 «o�~�a � 31.*5 ° ---- ---- -' - - ���---- ---- --- - ^^°~cno ' | 126277 0 */26x6 5 299.95 cxoLanN pnImrrmm coucxrznm pnuGnxmu 10~*280~504~50 � /~ �z�arr o���oxon _-'- _--_,.000°�U-_--___cxnLnow pxIwrzms-_--_' pnzmzzm ---pnzm7zms 10~4*00~500~50 !'| 126271 04/26185 au�o� u,00V°nn cxnLuoN pnImrznm 0~4600~627~62 '-- ' 126277 04v26/85 11000.o0 cuRLsnm pnzmrzwa pnxnrzmn 3~4600~*10~61 i /� L V i v v v v I !r i %w r i b i ti 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 8 CHECK ,NO._ DATE_ ___,___ - _gMOUNT_______ b 1263U4 -_ yEVDOR 126304 05/01/85 - - -- - - - ITE.M_O�SCRIPTION ACIOUN. T- NJ. _lNV"_._e.0•_ll_MESSAGE_ `r 126304 u4/19/85 12530.4 04/23/85_ -_ 1263U4 04/19/8`. 126304 04/19/85 50.59 -__,_ LUM9 --R 126277 04/26/85 1$000. ^0 CARLSON FRINTING 8.99__ PRINTING 26 -4600- 688 -68 CO 126277 X4/26/85___ -___ _ _ 1X695.]0 ---CA RLS ON_PR TNT ING- _ -__PRI NUNG 27_-4600- 660- 66_____.____ i< 126277 04/26/85 1900000 CARLS3N PRINTING KNOX PRINTING 28- 4600- 706 -70 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 99123.05 • 23 -.p -4 KNOx- LUMBR -_CO GEN- S.UPPIIES ' 36987 KNOX LUMB_R CO GEN SUPPLIES _ 10 -4504- 646 -64 I` 220.69 126278 04/23/P5 35.72 JERRYS FOODS 10- 4504 - 646 -64 ' -CLEAN SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 440 -44 10-4512-440-44 9 19 126278 126278 04/24/85 12.01 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 - - -_ ._4 7.73 • I„ . 126279 04/19/85 9011 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 �! c . 126279 04/19/05 _ 62. P1 _ JFRRYS OUR .OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 325- 30_._.__. 126279 04/19/85 44.90 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 390 -30 1262!9 U4/19/85 12.89 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 126279 04/19/85 ____ _40.72 JERRYS -OUR OWN HDWE_ - -_- GEN- _SUPPLIES. _10 -45C4- 440- 44- ._ - -__ 126279 64/19/95 9.46 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES _ __ -__ 10 -4504- 446 -44 126279 04/19/85 1.98 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 1262f9 J4/19/85 _ ^ ! - At. 44_ JERRYSOU3 _OWN._H04E GEN_.SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 126279 04/19/85 41 .1 8 JERRYS OUR O;lN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 126279 04/19/85 8.80 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 801 -80 126219 _ U4/19/85 33.37 ------- `- ___JERRYS_OUR._ OWN- HOWE _ _CORRECTION 10- 4504- 802- 8G____ -____ 126219 04/19/85 33.37 JERRYS OUR OWN HOW-_ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 802 -80 126279 04/19/85 33.37 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 802 -80 ____1Z6279 04 /19/851.29.. J�RRYSOU3_OWN._HDWE PHOTO- SUPPLIES 126279 04/19/85 4.17 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 1262f9 U4/19/85 24.13 JERRYS OUR OWN HOVE PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64 1262/9 _ _ ,. 04/19/85 _ 57.56..-- JERRYS__OUR OWN HOW_ - - _TOOLS -_10 -4580- 301 -30 126279 04/19/85 16.56 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE TOOLS 10 -4580- 646 -64 126279 04/19/85 23.89 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE ACCESSORIES 10- 4620 - 560-56 _- 126279 04/19/8583.25_ JERRYS OUR _OWN _HOWE REP ALR_PARTS- 2.7 -4504- 661 -66 126279 04/19/8: 10.00 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 661 -66 126279 04/19/85 13.72 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE REPAIR PARTS 27 -454q- 661 -66 I' 126279 04/19/85 _ . 10.40 _ JERRYS OUR _OWN _.HOWE -__ CHEMICAL_ 27 -4564- 661 -66 126279 L4/19185 25.86 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CHLORIDE 27 -4620- 662 -66 126279 U4/19/85 25.29 Jr- RRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 ___ 126279_ �04/19/BS 04/19/85___ _ 4.98 _ -51.22 JERRYS OUR 0W"DWE GEN SUPPLIES 29 -4504- 720 -72 126219 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWL REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 126279 04/19/85 46.56 JERRYS OUR OWN HOW-_ REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 .,I. 126279 _ J 4/19/85 _ - _ _ 6.06- -- JERRYS 0UR_QWN_H_DuE REPAIR PARTS 4.0 4.540- 807- 80_ 679.63 • -__._ s j 126292 04/30/85 139521.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSUANCE - -- -------- --- - - - --- - -- � 3.5.21_.0.0 • ____, - 126304 04/24/85 b 1263U4 0,4/24/85 126304 05/01/85 - - -- - - - 126304 U4/22/85 `r 126304 u4/19/85 12530.4 04/23/85_ -_ 1263U4 04/19/8`. 126304 04/19/85 >r 10- 4260 -510 -51 I,, 1: Lc ••• -CKS n­. -13.08 KNOX - LUMP--R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 50.59 KNCX LUM9 --R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 390 -30 8.99__ __KNOX_LUMB =R CO GEN_SUPP_L.IES __10- 4504- 390- 30_.___. 61.50 KNCX LUM9 -_R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 54.18 KNOX LUMB =R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 23 -.p -4 KNOx- LUMBR -_CO GEN- S.UPPIIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 36987 KNOX LUMB_R CO GEN SUPPLIES _ 10 -4504- 646 -64 I` 220.69 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 _i 19E5 T OF EDINA CHECK - LISTER 05- 01 -6 _ PAGE 9 AM- OU -NT.. ND -QI PT= M nEQU,RIPITON ACCDU. ALNO .- .IN.W"_P�Oa- #- RESSAGE��_, 126304 04/19/85 278.15 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 I; _..12630.4 _--. --._. 44/ 3^/ 85 ___- .,.__---- _�- _- _Z_Z- .52 -.__ KA10K -L U9B= R_CO -- -_- REPAIR -PARTS 10- 510- 51,-- 1263Q4 U4/22185 50.98 KNOX LUM8EP CO REPAIR PARTS _4540- _------ 10- 4540 - 540 -54 - - -_ -- ---- . - --I^ 10, 12630.4 04/30/85 55.79 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMNBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 (.:!._____126304.�_.�U4/19/_85_ - _45.1 -0 KKQX! LUMBE�C.D w_- LUMBER 1.0- 4.60..4,._6.46 -_64 F) �" 1263L'.4 1263L'.4 04/30/85 46.78 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER _ 10- 4604 - 646 -64 116304 04/3U/85 78.66 KNCX LUMP.,'R CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 126304 __- _. -__u4/ 26185 19. -98_ __KNQX_LU.MB_.R._C_C.. ___-- LUMBER 126304 L4/30/85 42.17 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 " 12630.4 04/30/85 42.85 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 12630404122 185 126304 29_#76 _KICX- LUMBER -CD .- __- _LUMBER 27_.4604 - 662 -66 04 /30 /85 41 .3.5 KNOT( LUMBER CO LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662 -66 1263U4 44/19/85 48.44 KNOX LUMBER CU LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662 -66 I,o 126304_____- _04130 /8560 Q K.NOX__ LUMBER -_C 0_ -. .CON.T_.REQ.IIRS ITS 126304 04/30/85 29988 KNOX LUMBER CO CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 126304 04/26/85 54.76 KNCK LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 t_._ - -- _126304_ -_ _ 64/23/85 _ 7.67 T ^ -23.79 KJ�fOK- LUMBEftC.0_ _aEV- S.UPPIdFS 28- 708 -7.0 - I' 126304 04/23/85 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES _4504- 28 -4504- 708 -70 ~- _I' -^ 2r 126304 126304 04/26/85 21.47 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 2d -4504- 708 -70 !2, 04/23/.85._- -2._77 7t KN- _.__GEN - SUPPLIES 125304 04/23/85 10.90 KNOX LUMBER CO GEd SUPPLIES 28- 45 04- 708-70 - -i 126304 04130/85 10.35 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 31 KNOAI_LUMB R_CC _LUMBER 78 -4604- 708 -_70_- !3-' 126304 04/23/85 106.20 KNCi( WMP.cR CO LUMBER 28 -4604- 708 -70 _ •, 125304 1;4/24/85 36960 KNOX LUMBER CO GEV "SUPPLIES 40- 450'4- 801 -80 ; -..-1 26 - - - - - -- - - 3. - - 'I .I 12637.4 04/24/85 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPP IES 40- 4504 - 3- 80 - - -- - -- 80 - -- r -- i 1 ,825.87 i i #i# -CKS - _- 12631 Z05!24[85_- 36...52 1 AWS.ON_PRDDUCISEN- SUPP_IES 126317 04/24/85 111.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 <' 126317 U4/22/85 92.17 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 _ 12631 -7 - ._4510.1_ /85123.85 LA NS3NPRQDUC_LS GEmS.UPP.LIES 10- 325 -30 <, 126317 U5/01:/85 290.68 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEI SUPPLIES _450.4- 10- 4504 - 646 -64 126317 04/22/85 124.90 LAWSON RROOUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 _._126317_-- --D5/01/_85 _____75.52 IAWS.O-�LP.RODUCTS REPATR PARTS 10- 4.540- 560 -56 126317 04/24/85 315.43 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 46.20- 560 -56 :I 1,170.74 # f ## -CKS IJn i 126323_04/23/.8.5 126323 --_ 0.4/19/85 �- _29 -7.50 29.75 L- 2NH0FE -__ SEN__.S11P_P..LIES 10- 45C4- 260 -.26_ LIN190FF PHOTO SUPLIES 10- 4508 - 440 -44 i:•I 126323 04/19/85 4. 5D LINHOFF PHOTO SLPPLIES 10.4508- 440 -44 ��. _- 126323,__ 135-1 .Q1L8 4.50 J TNRD FF PHOTO S1IPPLTFC 1A 6S , Icn 336.25 • - -- - -_ " 126324 -__ -44/19.1.85 _- 10.236.3.4 LOrT OMP_LLLER- CHARGE- 10- 4228 - -.16 126324 04/19/85 519.93 LOGIS COMPUTER CHARGES .160 10- 4230 - 160 -16 I„ I 126324 C4/19/85 1,978.22 LOGIS COMPUTER CHARGES 10- 4233 - 200 -20 _126324.._ 52-42_1.9[85 96919 _L -0625 rDMPUT.EB_CHARGES T0- 2 j 126324 U4/19/85 746.05 LOGIS COMPUTER CHARGES _.42-33- .42.0--t.4 10- 4233 - 560 -56 _ 126324 U4/19/85 19919.47 LOGIS COMPUTER CHARGES 40- 4232 - 800 -80 I7. 17� V � . I 1985 CITY OF EDINA _.. CMECK_N0._ DATE CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 10 __- AMOUNT - _�-- UEN002 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUyT NO.._INY. -M P•0• / MESSAGE 116324 C4/19/p5 126324 _ 04/19/85_._______ _ 126324 u4/19/85 126337 1[6331 04/23/85 126337 04/23/85 116337 U4/2.3/8 -5 -__ ._. 126339 f ■ ■ #rf 04/23/85 19066.26 f 397.76 LAKELAND ENG REPAIR PARTS 10 -4274- 449 -44 397_.76 ± _ 126342 C4/23/85 17.27 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 ti. 1[6341 C5/C1/85 7.20 MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126342_,._ -__ __ u4 /23/8.5_ -- 178 .85 MAC 0UE'EN .DUI° -INC_ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 203.32 * - ie. to . - _.....___ *** -CKS 1= 'z *** -CKS �i i 283.12 LOGIS COMPUTER CHARGES 50- 4233 - 820 -82 13 , -- 283.12_ - __ -_IOGI 3 COMPUTER - 0ARGES 50- 4233 - 840 -84 283.11 LOGIS -�-, it COMPUTER CHARGES 50- 4233 - 860 -86 ti 89218.55 04/23/85 92.00 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 449 -44 * ** -CKS c 7.69 ___ -- ____LAKE - _STATE EQUIP_ - - --.- REPAIR. -PARTS 368.68 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13.02 684.68 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5.21 __-- IAKE- ST_AT'_ EQUIP _--- R.EPA.IR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -5.6 19066.26 f 397.76 LAKELAND ENG REPAIR PARTS 10 -4274- 449 -44 397_.76 ± _ 126342 C4/23/85 17.27 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 ti. 1[6341 C5/C1/85 7.20 MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 126342_,._ -__ __ u4 /23/8.5_ -- 178 .85 MAC 0UE'EN .DUI° -INC_ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 203.32 * - ie. to . - _.....___ *** -CKS 1= 'z *** -CKS �i i v ffr#f# , - _- -- ---- -_ #••- CKS_ -�-, it ti 126344 04/23/85 92.00 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 449 -44 126344 -_ 04/23/85._- -__ - -- __71•!70_. MED OXYGEN _8_EOUTP EQUI? MA.LNT 10- 4274 - 449- 44 126344 04/23/85 13.02 MEO OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 449 -44 ar 126344 05/Q1/85 78.35 MED OXYGEA & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 . - - -- - - - -- ---- - -' - -- 254.37 * - -- -' - - -- --- � . AW * ** -CKS �< . 126346 04/19/85 1859747.56 MET Y WASTE C L COMM SEWER 40- 4312 - 800 -80 v 1859747.56 * ,. r r f r r f - --- -* ** -CKS I` 146353 _. �4- /2.4/85 31.34 � MINN,:AZ k- GLOVE GEN_SUPPIIFS 1n -4504- 5.60- 5�------ 31.34 .-------- - - - - -- mr IT �� i _ #f• *rr - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - __- - - - - -- - -_ _. --_ -. _ _ -- f *• -CKS - -- - - - -- -- r•, 125356 04/26/85 176.97 MINN =S9TA BLUEPRINT BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570 - 260 -26 _126356_____U4/26/8.5 ^- 267.F5-.MINNESOTA BLUE? _RI,NT BLUE PRINII)�LG 10- 4_570_260- 26 125 356 04/26/65 91.63 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT ' BLUE PRI NTINS 10 -4570- 260 -26 _ eo 536.45 r f • • • f - -- -- ------------- - -- - -- f r • -CKS 125359_ - -_ 0.412,4/85 265.13 MLNNIDRQ SNC_ R.EP._AIS-P-A.RLS 1_D -4-5 40- 560 -56 126359 05/'01/85 31.21 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 er'' 126359 04/24/$5 21.60 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 v 1985 Y OF EDINA CHECK _GISTER 05 -01 -._ PAr,E 11 _ CHECK _N09_DA.TE__ _ AMOUNT_- __.. -__ V_NQ.C3__— _ ITEM_DESCAI�LIAN nCCOUNT .NO._.INY._tl_ P.O. 9 MESSAGE .__. 126359 04/24185 33.63 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 125359 U4/23/85 29524.00_ HINN TORO_._ INC_.____. ._- _- _- CAPITAL._..OUTLAY 1.0 -4900- 600 -60 126359 04/30/95 59386.30 MINN TORC INC CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900 - 600 -60 125359 04/19/85 121.65 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 126359 _G4 /23/85_- __ -___ ____ _98.84- - ---__-MINN TORO_.. INC ,- rTEPAIR -P_AE.TS 2.24.540 -_ 662- _66_ ^___ 89482.06 f 126360 04/30/85 - 39945 - _- _- _MINNESO.TA.._WANN_R - -.. -- - __.._.GEN- _SUP-PL.IES —__ 28- .4504 - 708x7.0. 30.45 * + ++t ►+ - 116362 04/23/85 217.69 MOOEL STONE COMPANY CONCRETE 10- 4528- 301 -30 I 126362 04/23/85 439.65. MODEL STONE._ COMPANY. ____.__.GEN_ - SUPPLIES___ 40- _4504- 783- 78.__ -__ 657.34 + 126371 05/01/85 432.00 MILROFF STEEL CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 432.00 ' -- - - - -- - -- - -- _ -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- f + *f +r • ** -CKS 126376 04/24/85 101.60 MODERN EQJIPMEVT GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 805 -80 101.60 • *f*arr * ** -CKS 126381 - - _ _ 04/26/85 _ 85900_ - ____ -- STAR_&._ TRIBUNE___- _---- .- ADVERT.IS.ING 10- 4212 - 120- 12___ 126381 0.4/26/85 80900 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISIIG - -. 10- 4212 - 160 -16 126391 04/26/85 120.70 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10 -4212= 640 -64 ! 126391 04/26/85 ._ _ 46992 STAR_ &- TR.IBUNE____.____ AOVE.R7ISLRG .23- 42.1.4 -. 610 -61 331.92 + - - - - --- - CKS - 126383 04/23/85 9,265.58 MPLS COMP TR_AS WATER 30- 4640 - 783 -78 ! -99265.58 •- • ** -CKS 126385 05/C1/85 360. ?0 MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE INSPECTIONS 10- 4242 - 353 -30 126385 (15/01/85 1.080.cr) MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE INSPECTIONS 60- 1300 - 015 -18 - - I944C.C-0 ' - --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - * **-CKS 126400 U4/19/85 925.52 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES 10- 4616 - 560 -56 925.62 -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- ---------- -- * *+ -CKS 126403 CONLREP-AIRS ?L- 4.2.48- 661 -66_- 9n.00 - - *** -CKS ^~ � ^pus cxrY O OF coImA c 17700 O cxErn ncazo7cn 0 05~01~85 p p»as oa �. °°°~cnm / v vZ6421 _ _ _0.4x2^/-85 _ __,sa.,o'-_-_-_o�onN-Cm«Iw u u�cAoL V V�.gp / 126436 o o4/23v85 1 196°60 p pumpm u wErcn ocnx n ncpArm pxnxo 1 10~4540~540~54 r r- , ,pa.om_°_________-____ - - '_-__------ - ---- -- - - - - ' '-� ^~ . ° °^°~cno ' ' � 1264*1 0 04v2*x85 7 7.33 T THE pxrmr swnp x xoxcnrzozno 5 50~4214~822~82 i i = l lia4 41 0 04/2*185 7 7.34 T THE pncmr oxop x xuvcxrxmz*o 5 50~4e14~842~84 vz6441 0 0*/24/85 - --- _ r.»n - --__-Jnc-��zm{ smnP-__-_-_---_x - -�214-u62c8m_-_'- ac.00 ° ° ' ' ' --^°^^°�---------'------'----'------�------ _ __-__-°�°~�mo_| ' w 1 126*45 0 05/01/85 , ,,»os.*n p pxpEm cxL41Emonm u CO p pxnro 1 10~4620~560~56 | |^ ' ^°^~cxo ' ' 125*52 u u4/24/85 z za o nuzcm ycnx axrrcnv u ucpxxT Pourn 1 10~*5*0~560~56 � � °~ 125451 0 0*/24x85 4 40.86 m mwIcv osnV oxrrcnv n nsPxIn pxnro ' '10~*54q~560~5* ) )� ' 125452 0 04/24/85 1 111.61 _ _oo!cK oEn« exrrcnv-_--'__JmEpx%O-PARTS 1 10~45*0~5*0~56 ' 12645u 0 004 /24r8 5 2 2*"24 o ouzr( usov ox7rcxv n nspAIm pxn7m 1 10~4540~560~56 � | ,W 1 125452 0 04a4v85 v va.o* u uozoo acnv exrrcnv n nEpxIn pxnro 1 10-4540-560-56 � | i`- 04/24/85 z zl.»»- U Uz�a���6_-___.-__--------- - � o oor.�o ° ° . -_''d .^� %W `^ °^°°^° - — — - - - - -----�---' - -- _ _-__---_- - -- ^^°~�ws ! ! ,| ^~�1 1 126451 o osxovvxs 1 18.60 x x.L.snuLo u co.zwc. s scw suppLxcn 1 10~4504~318~30 -'-2e6*57_____04/2-3/- _ __20.`» 2 2m/�.______ 3 39.12 ° . .�j ' ^ ^°°°°°�----- - --------------- - ----------------' - --- -----_ ° °°~cns 1au*a` 0 0,4/24/85 1 110. 10 x xcco SALES u ncnozcc s scw ouppLrco 1 1o~4so4~m*a~a* 1 ' 126461 u u*/aa,^s 1 125.40 R RFF� q��F� I q�RVTrP r rrU �IMP�TCe q q�-4rnL-�A��AA �J^ 235^-��� w�.. 126465 ouvo��xn zv 5n ° . --------.- .°�"�,�� '--- ------- nzcoFzsLn 3Lune m CO GE11 SUPPLIES 28-4504-708-70 ('. i, _ |- °°°~Cns ~ ` /` 126490 04/22/85 1264911 03L0.1 /A5 1e6492 05/01/85 131 *90 -99-36— 231.26 * 80.95 Rn - a c; SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES glirRUTM WTI I TAMS PiT ?Jlr 10-4504-325-30 1n-Lr.4,L-v%r-%n sourHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 I- -***-CKS J"'i ***-CKS 1l Tt 1935 fY OF EDINA CHECK -GTSTER 05 -01 -a, PAGE 13 r. CHEC-K-NO-sL-DA-T-E --AMOUNT Ur Nn 04 ITEM nrsrErTTfnN srrnulyt run*- IN- Ve- b_P.O� -.p- MESSAGE, — 126469 04124/85-.------------293.1 2.--.ROAD-MACHl,.4ERY----REPAIR--P-ART.-q :4540- 560- 56- 126469 04/22/85 216.67 ROAD Mk-CHINERY REPAIR PARATS --10- -.____ 10-4540-560-56 126469 L4/22/85 70.84 ROAD MACHINERY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 c 17 In **,--CKS 126473 04/24/85 91.56 R.E. MOONEY 9 ASSOC. REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-805-80 91.56 ***-CKS 1264 75--------.O-5jl0,j-a5 —1-27.-66---RU.E.EAID_GE_j.OH_NSgN______T()OLS 1211.66 126479 04/19/85 158.04 R & A SPE:IIALTIES CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248- 707 -70 ***-CKS 126481 04/24/85 47,50 ST i:-'GI!S PtA:PER Co GUARD RAILS 10-4546-340 30 47.50 C KS ---.I -d 64 8-3-0.5/-QJJ-145---1.6.,Z3,--SAiULLE&U?-?-Lr BEN SuPPL TER in-4sn4,-48,0v,,-4-R 16.23 1[6484_ - -- 0.4/2 3/85 —. AMERI.C.&N-S.HARECOM... TEl EP-HOKE 510- 5.1-- 126484 04/26/85 101.91 AMERICAN S'lARECOM TELEPHONE 10-4256-510-51 237.12 126465 04/23/85 778.98 STATE BLDG ZNSP BLDG PERMITS 10-3095-000-00 126485 U.4/23/85 90050 STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX 10-3113-000-00 -- - - - 69-,4-8-. 126486 04/26/85 60.00. DON STREIC4ER GUNS UNIFORM ALLOWENCE 10-4266-420-42 CENTER- 35 92 RAnyo FoliTp 10 - 4 9 1 &"-- 2JL--4-2 --**-C:KS 126490 04/22/85 1264911 03L0.1 /A5 1e6492 05/01/85 131 *90 -99-36— 231.26 * 80.95 Rn - a c; SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES glirRUTM WTI I TAMS PiT ?Jlr 10-4504-325-30 1n-Lr.4,L-v%r-%n sourHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 I- -***-CKS J"'i ***-CKS 1l Tt ,vwo czry or cuINA cmccm xcs/orcn 05~01~85 p^ac 14 roIECn_wo.-_0*7c_- m°-g_2°0°_w-ncSiSoec---_, ^ ~ - 126495 c*/aw 5 zso i" �. . � / | - 1265uZ o4v23ve5 ,n" 15.47 ~ ' 126503 c*m9v25 19. In- 12650 04/23/05 _ 37*01 SU9JIBA-4 3LUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10-4 5 40- 80 3- 80 musuz c4/23/85 37.01- � 1265u3 04v23v85 sr° REPAIR �� - - - -- — - 56. 54 c ~ / ~^~~CnS 126505 o4x26rnx v .81 oum xovcnTxozxe 10~4210~1*0~14 �1~ °°°-cwo �1 `| 126508 04/26/85 162.60 ST -7AUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-260-26 ~ ---~- ^-'~~'-~ '~`~ ~' '~~L ~^~^ ==" ""'-^^E" 10-45x4-260~26 ~ 12659.8 u*v26185 vs.ar '___--aT"A uL'enon______'scm ouppL 10-4504-420-42 � ' vuosou u*/soxos a.*r mr pxuL eaxw Gcm ouppLIcu 10~*504~4a0~ ~ 126508 u*v22/85 128.57 sr PxuL noom scm ouppLJzca 10~*504~*40~** ~ `aa»ox- 05/01/85 __39.11 I_�uoL-noon____-6cm. Su��Lzc 0-450*~**0~44 12650.8 u*xcz/n» ,x.no or p*oL aoow orrzcc omPpLzcm 10~4516~510~51 . ^ 1e6508 a*voc/nn 50.48~ or pvoL ozmn cxEoIr '10~4516r510~51 . 12*5o8 _ 04v19ve5 52.vV~_____- T'p«uL-eoox�_-__--cn�oxI�0~*51*~510~51 _-_ 126506 04ve3/85 18*.n2 or PAUL aonn opprcc suppLzco 10~*516~510~51 ' � vzuxou c4 /30 v8 5 *zz . «n mr p* m� oonx orp�cc oupp��co �o~*s��~s��~n� ^ i^ ~ `zonuV __u*/aaxoz o*/eafVs __rn vl'5sSI-PxV� pDoKDrpzC��uPPLJ 10-4516 —600-60 lzanuu ° 89 ST p^oL poou n^non cmozp 19-4914 *2a *a 126508 U4/19/95 s.p* or "xoc eJon mcm uuppLzco U«~ 23-45 610-61 °aanuu _ 04x19v85 _ 11.62 ST �AUL BOOK - -_--__--_-_.ucw-uoPpLzc 3~*50*~*11~61 ~ 126508 u4x19/95 s°vo or DAuL aoon mcw uuppLzco 23~45 04~611~61 !~` � | 126509 u*119/95 s°ao ST PAUL eoom acm ouppLIcu 2n~4 50 4-61 ,~a, .1aa5uu__C4/2o/mx --__--__---_1~� _� I _�yUc_ �_� -4516~660~6* 1oano u u�vu�vo 5 ° r r mr puo� 000� orpzcc uo;FpLIco 27~4516-663 *a !`. � � 1265o8 u*voyvns 8.00 ar 34;uL anom mcm suppLzco 28~*504~708~70 `]~ 126508 v4/a4fV�_' ls ��� 801r80_- '" -. ' 12 1n. 2,142.50 — cnm - - '-- -- ' 2,142.50 , / ^~ .".... C4,24'8' 31.70 """,""~N .°C""` uE"° Cvw^ *Er^I°* 50-4248-861 -86 ~ .~_ �u � �1 � -- __ -----_-_- 0,4/22/85 aa°va o r noae scw uupPzcm 10~4504~560~56 � . . -_-_ '--_--- w / �vm . , or sozmA cmcc uzsrcx 05~01~ pAmc 15 � -___CHEcm_mm"_D&IE____ !�! _----'_ ----__-_- 1oon,o--__-u4vZ.n��� 126516 usvuvmn — - ----- ----U---- - °_��w�-mp°o°_w-a�s aa°,a r ,°°~cny |" !' --sr°�__�����c��__� 4s°vz u uc*no nncoucm n ncpxzn Pxnvm 4 40~4540~803~80 ._ ,Uo.oa ^ ! !. °°°-cny , __''-_300.78 --_-___ocumu s szs-Ln'_-__--o 0 0wt4a_-'____ 126526 04/23 /85 5 046.99 ' ' __xcm a6 oon .-. . o,8aa°99 ° c '| �°°°^° -- --- ---'---- ~nno / . --- --- -- ------------ --- -- ^. 126539 uwa3/oo 19054 ro ruxp suppLr cnmpxmv cmcmzCALm 27~45*4~662_6* '-12 6 5 39---_-_�A. 146 IS 27-4 1 9201°20 ° -`� 126541 04m9x85 39.98 7*nscr mcm ouPpLxso 10~4504~440~44 `!- -_1265*1 v i'. 1sv°v0 ° [ ~' -12*542-'__'__o-4/231-8s_--___--____265°-lL3_-___-_ronNVozur ao~sa---__--_-' ----------^ 265.13 1265*5 04v23xe5 1659*8 nonv ory mAxxsc noon mcpxzn PARTS 10~4540~540~54 ` --- - ",. 1265*8 04x19v85 716985 THE pnzmr owup PnzmTzms 23~4600~610~61 �|. 716°85 ° - -_--__- - -! |-/ ___xzy�n� u*��Yx4� ae°�V___-__-umzs�mm�-umLxnzrco______umz 4aaa~*oO�oa |�- 126551 04/19/85 39797* umIponno umLznzrco umspoun wcLoucwcc 1u~4aaa~^z1~o2------- � 125551 o*/,m/wn 4°n9 wmzpomnm umLznIrco scm ouPpLzEm 10~4504~440~44 �'.. - _''---_-_ - -- |^| 126565 04m9/85 20003 wzKrwG TmnwoTnL nTn mcm muPeL%Eu 10~4504~480~48 ooO°oV � °°°~cmu �=|' ' ' cxm - c __ 1265*5 04v23xe5 1659*8 nonv ory mAxxsc noon mcpxzn PARTS 10~4540~540~54 ` --- - ",. 1265*8 04x19v85 716985 THE pnzmr owup PnzmTzms 23~4600~610~61 �|. 716°85 ° - -_--__- - -! |-/ ___xzy�n� u*��Yx4� ae°�V___-__-umzs�mm�-umLxnzrco______umz 4aaa~*oO�oa |�- 126551 04/19/85 39797* umIponno umLznzrco umspoun wcLoucwcc 1u~4aaa~^z1~o2------- � 125551 o*/,m/wn 4°n9 wmzpomnm umLznIrco scm ouPpLzEm 10~4504~440~44 �'.. - _''---_-_ - -- |^| 126565 04m9/85 20003 wzKrwG TmnwoTnL nTn mcm muPeL%Eu 10~4504~480~48 ooO°oV � °°°~cmu �=|' ' ' cxm - c __ °°°~cmu �=|' ' ' cxm - c __ 1985 cIry or coIwA coccn ncazsrcn os~ov~os pxsc 16 ^ ^~ 1265 12 - 5�� n_ zwxcmTnnn '23~120�~000~00 r |_ __C*czn_mn,_oxm�___________^MOu�L� . ___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_ 126572 C4/30/85 v 9162.)3 °_Imn°_�p^o°_mmcaaum�---- . GEN SUPPLIES 26-4504-688-68 | ' 126572 _ U4/3 U/85 z 446 z5 12' u4/30v85 22.95 04~ / cLor 126572 04/30/85 i ' � ..� ' 126571 04m4m5 110000 x u v y^rrcnv xcpxzn nAo7o 10~4 5 40~560~56 ' 126571 --- u4ve4/85 ---- ----- 77.50 '----'--_- mcmxzccm 10~422*~504~50 -_--_ -- / �| 126571 u4v2*i85 3F .75 A u Aomrrcuv PAR TS 620~560~56 [�| � � | � ~� w °~ � �. 126593 `a*5v3 ,aa5v3 ,z6sv3 -- ' - vaox9* " C | ^ ' 1265 12 - 5�� n_ zwxcmTnnn '23~120�~000~00 r . u*v23/85 ___ ___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_ 126572 C4/30/85 v 9162.)3 VAN PAPER CO GEN SUPPLIES 26-4504-688-68 | ' 126572 _ U4/3 U/85 z 446 z5 112. 58___ u4/30v85 22.95 04~ / cLor 126572 04/30/85 v 9160.00 VAN PAPER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28~4504~704~70 - '--- ------------------'--.| u*119/85 39604"16 sromc pnoxr mcmxzccm 10~422*~504~50 . 3960 .1 cns - 126579 04/24/o5 ____________-177.613______WzLL-IAMm-srccL~mows_____Rsm_no2�L,zc ' 126579 05vu`/85 s' ~ rr wzcLIxna orccL~nuuc sex ouppLxco 10~4504~646~64 ! 126519 u4vawn» *"n WILLIAMS ar---cL.mouc ucLozms ouppLsca 10~4610~560~56 126579 04/24/85 _ _ _ 109 °37 -_____wzLLI^ma-arccL~oowc--__� PARTS 0~4oZV~saO~sa_-- voanry 04/24/85 213.78 WILLIAMS urc:-'L.nnWs pxnrm 27~4e20~662~6 6 ' 568.01 ^ |' ' -' ------ ------------- --- ^^°-cwo ' 12 6562 . 04/Z3/85 5**.50- -__--RVpnnw_n�orm- xo !' 612~*62~66 '-_-- »*n.so ° .. | 126593 `a*5v3 ,aa5v3 ,z6sv3 -- ' - vaox9* | " C | ^ owawos 3000 nImmconr^ cLxv zwxcmTnnn '23~120�~000~00 r . u*v23/85 ___ ___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_ 05v01/85 CLAY ___�______cmopr_ouppLz mcnsILm* arccL pwru 23~*588~611~*1 ___ 1u6 613 owsumx 197.45 ~ prwwcsnro c��x on�pr supp��cu 23-4588-616-61 ' |. 112. 58___ u4/30v85 22.95 nzmwsaorx cLor cnxpT SoppLuco ay~*swo~ava~mx |. . '-------- -------'-----�'--- � - '--- ------------------'--.| u*119/85 39604"16 sromc pnoxr mcmxzccm 10~422*~504~50 . 3960 .1 | 126612 04/e3/85 1*7.90 nzomcnr xnpoxLr CORP scm mwppLxcw 40~4504~803~80 ^_ 147°90 ° muovo 05v01/85 273.89 mcnsILm* arccL pwru 10~*620~560~56 1u6 613 oU4/23/85 119~00 wcwczLuu urccL sex ouppLIcn 40 45 0*~801 o~o __l aho13� ____-_- 112. 58___ _~--_�__-- _ .~�-� 505.47 ° ~�. / ^~ �o*ru, u*xvv/ny r �,s | ^ ^ sn exw ^w . 126702 04m9/85 3,520.10 L^mmm REcuTxnmu Amso w � -- —'------- ` - ---' ---- ` °°°-cKn � CONST 10-1458-000-00 0 ige 1 Y OF EDINA CHEC. GISTER 05-01- PAGE 17 C H EC K _N 0 @__D AJE._ AM OUIN I-.- _VLm a I - ITEM DE-SX8.101TON _ACCjMUN_T_NO- INV.—#_ P*O.—#--MESSAGE-- 39520910 1267U3 04/19/85 2,105.00 NINE MILE CREEK NINE MILE CREEK 10-2248-000-00 29105.00 * !7 126104 J4/19/85 200.00 LES 4NOYNG WAGES 10-4200-646-64 20•. 1D. * 126/05 J4/19/85 203.07 VORILLA; COMP INVEN SUPPLIES 23-1209-000-00 126706 04/19/85 100.00. BURr_AU OF NATL DUES 10-4204-140-14 100.00 12670,7 04/19/85 717.25 WM J BERQUIST CONT SERV 10-4200-140-14 717.25 12670 J4/19/85 120*00 PTAC INVESTIGATION 10-4202-421-42 120.00 1271 126709 J.4/19/85 60,00 ATOM CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 421 -42 60.30 126710 04/19/85 35200 EXPLOR---,-R 20ST 911 CONFERENCE 10-4202-421-42 352.30 126711 U4/19/85 115e00 METRO SAL94GE & TOW EQUIP MAIhT 10-4274-421-42 115.00 126712 04/19/85 150*03 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC TELETYPE.SERV 10-4268-420-42 126113 04/19f85 15.00 BERQUIST CO LIC REFUND 10-3056-000-00 !4 - 15.00 126f14 04/19/85 6.53 ALL FIRE TEST CO CONT REPAIRS 10-4248"449-44 6.50 126715 04/19/F5 21.95 GENERAL ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 446 -44 126715 04/19/85 13*00 GENERAL ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-446-44 5 9 A. 5 126116 04/19/85 45*00. KAREN KUNZMAN CLASS REFUND ART CTR 23-3500-000-00 126717 04/19/85 45.00 DIANE RILBRATH CLASS REFUND ART CTR 23-3500-000-00 126718 04/19/85 18.00 PERCY BAROTT REFUND ART CENTER 23- 3500 - 000 -00 126719 0,4/19/85 45.00 DONNA HAMILTON REFUND ART CENTER 23-3500-000-00 45-0-0 i75 126720 04/19/85 45*00 JOHN TSAKSEN CLASS REFUND ART CTR 23-3500-000-00 0 1965 CITY OF EDINA 04/23/85 CHECK REGISTER RC IDENTIFICATION 05 -01 -85 PAGE 18 10- 4200 - 440 -44 CHECK DATE AMOUNT_ VEN00R IL M DESCRIPTION ACLU- N"O_+�NV. P.O._p_MESSAGE - - -.RC IDENTI°ICAT ?ON_ - GEN - SUPPLIES -- - -- -# - -__ Tz v RC IDEVTIFIICATION 45.00 • 10- 4504 - 420 -42 13 4 126121 U4/19/85 10.80 COUIIER O!SPATCH CONT SERV 10- 4200- 100 -10 10.40 • 04/30/85_ _ __ _ .__ _ -__ 2.00_ --- _RC IDENTIFICATION. -__ ' 126722 04/19/85 37.68 - PERKIES INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 2.00 RC IDENTIFICATTON GEN SUPPLIES 37.68 • 126(23 U4/19/85 107.86 WM 8 TURNER ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 842 -84 j< 126126 107.86 + 110.00 EBERHARDT MGMT REFUND POOL LIC 10 -3060- 000 -00 1267/-4 04/19/85 6.58 C C SHA °BROW CO GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 126724 04/30/85 41.59 C C SMARR)W CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 U4/19/85 810.00 TESSMAN SEED B CREM 48.17 + 10- 4536 - 353 -30 126725 04/23/85 4.00 RC IDENTIFICATION CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 440 -44 126125 _ o4/30/R5 ______--- __4.00__ - -.RC IDENTI°ICAT ?ON_ - GEN - SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 140 -14- 126725 04/19/85 9.44 RC IDEVTIFIICATION GEV SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 126125 U4/19/85 2.36 RC IDEENTIFICATION GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 126125 04/30/85_ _ __ _ .__ _ -__ 2.00_ --- _RC IDENTIFICATION. -__ - GEN_SUPPIIES 10 -4504- 490- 49 - -,.- 126725 04/30/85 2.00 RC IDENTIFICATTON GEN SUPPLIES 50 -4504- 840 -84 23.36 • 126126 U4/19/85 110.00 EBERHARDT MGMT REFUND POOL LIC 10 -3060- 000 -00 i= !'I 126727 U4/19/85 810.00 TESSMAN SEED B CREM WEARING SHOES 10- 4536 - 353 -30 126727 04/19/85 810.30- TESSMAN SEED 8 CHEM CORRECTION 10- 4536 - 353 -30 126127 u4/19/85 810.40- TESSMAN SEED. -K CHEM CORK- ECTION 10- 4568- 353- 30_- _.- . 126127 U4/19/85 F10900 TESSMAN SEED B CHEM SEED -__._ 10 -4568- 353 -30 126727 04/19/85 810.00 TESSMAN SEED 8 CHEM SEED '10- 4568- 642 -64 126727 _ _U4 /19/85 - ____ -- _ 856.00_ TESS�AnLS.__D- B�H�PI_- -SEED 10- 45.68.- 642- .64__ -.. 1.666.00 • v 126728 _ 04/19/85 64.17 CeROLE- KULAK MILEAGE 27 -4208- 660 -66 - -- - i - -- -- L I - 126728 04/19/85 64.17- CAROLE KULAK CORRECTION 27- 4208- 667 -66 126728 04/19/85 64.17 CAROLE KU -AK MILEAGE 27- 4208- 667 -66 - - -- - - -- -- - -64.1 7__• II 126729 04/19/85 472.00 BUREAU OF NATL DUES 10- 4204- 140 -14 - 126730, 04/19/85 108.00 PUBLIC RISK 8 INS MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 140 -14 108.00 • 126131 04/19/85 174.85 YEROK CDR? EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 510 -51 dry: 1 14.8 5 • _ lo< 126732 04/23/85 500.0 FIRE INST ASSN OF MN BOOKS 10- 4502 - 440 -44 - -- - - - - -- -500.0 0-- • 126733 J4/23/85 55.00 DATREY MARKETING PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 ,•._ 55.70 • �. 126734 (14/23/85 12600 JOSEPH TERESI AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 y` v 1965 iY OF EDINA CHECK _GISTER 05 -D1 PAGE 19 126745 _--.0412.31_85 - -_- _25.00 UM R FECK $CHDDL R -CANE 25.00 * ._.12.6746_____ - _.-.04_/23/_.85 26..56..* 1 D_UI3__& RA.MAM Mtl rfirE 40-4 248 0.6- 26.56 * 126747 ___._ -. _CH!ECK__NO.._-DATE___ -.___ _1 .OD_ - A�OUNI_ V NDD�_- ii E_M_DES.CRTPTIeN ACCD_UNT_NO.__LNV.-A__P,.O. -I .MESSAGE 116747 14/23/85 100000 GERALD 3RIMACOMBE INSTRUCTCR FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61 " I 126747 04/23/85 126.20 + GERALD BRIMACOMBE CORRECTION is c� ' 126735 04/23/85 25.00 WILD MOUNTAIN DISCOUNT PRICE 10 -4504- 624 -62 cl I _' . -- - 25.00 + ! 126748 04/23/85 54.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY WAGES 23- 4200 - 610 -61 126736 94/23/85 28.00 DONS APPLIANCE &`TV CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 446 -44 _ -_ -_ -- - -- - 126736 04/23/85 9.95 DONS A.aPLIANCE & TV REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 446 -44 23- 3410 - 000 -00 ' __ ..1267.49-- _..____- _041Z31_85. 37..95.. *_ - ELORE3__SCNMETnri - - - -- -- -- -- - - - -- - - -- - -__ ._-------- -- - - -- 126737 04/24/85 4.76 RADIO SHAC'K CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 126137 -- __ -- _04/23/85-__-.-___9.48 R. ADID._SHA.CK- .- _____- __CABLE__T_V- 126737 04/23/85 24.95 RADIO SHACK LAMPS 6 FIXTURES 27.4606- 661 -66 126737 04/26/85 24.95- RADIO SMACK CORRECTION 27 -4606- 661 -66 ;fl 126737 04/24/85 - - - -__ _24.95__. RADIO -SHACK_ --. -- -PARIS 27_46.20- 660- .66 - -_ _ -_ --- ----- - -._.- 39.19 + _- 12.6738_._ - - 04>23C8.5 -.-- 340..70_ TB.M __GEN SUPPLIES 1D- 450- 4:-510 -.51 340.00 J 2T '' L.iI _126739 ___ _- __U4/_23./_85__. --12 __NELSJILRAOI_D_C.OMM- REPAIR PARTS 10 -4560 560-56 - -- -- - -- -- -.- 127.00 * J ___126740 - _04./21_L85 .-43.54 r,M STEWALRL_LUMRCR &EN Super TFS 10-45Oti.305 -30_ 43.54 * 126741_______.__0.4 /22/.85- 2.945.25 ME.T_R0 MASIE BLDG PERMITS 104.95- 0DO.�DD____... •i' ____ -- 2,945.25 - _CDYTROL I __.._- .]26Z42__041.22./__8`�_ -- 62..6.2 DICK_RLZC)L_____ GEN__S_UPP_ITES 1D -45 4- 6.46 -6_4 -- .- - - -- "j 62.62 126143_ ____9._4/227.85_ -.- JI". A1'_CH_SALES_L.O_. GFN SUPPLLES 10 -4504- 301 -30 -- 105.99 • ___ 1267.44 -- U.4.1 23/__85_- .___3 7 e.8 D_ yCY,S ERIC E .- PARIS_ 10- 4b2D -- 5.6.0 _56 37.80 • `:� 126745 _--.0412.31_85 - -_- _25.00 UM R FECK $CHDDL R -CANE 25.00 * ._.12.6746_____ - _.-.04_/23/_.85 26..56..* 1 D_UI3__& RA.MAM Mtl rfirE 40-4 248 0.6- 26.56 * 126747 ___._ -. 4 /23/8.5 -_ -.___ _1 .OD_ GERALD- BRIMACOMBE_ INSTRUCTOR FEE i 116747 14/23/85 100000 GERALD 3RIMACOMBE INSTRUCTCR FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61 126747 04/23/85 1.0.0• GERALD BRIMACOMBE CORRECTION 23 -4100- 614 -61 c� ' � �''L -• - - -- - - - -- -- 1.0.0_.90 -+ I _' . -- - ! 126748 04/23/85 54.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY WAGES 23- 4200 - 610 -61 �: - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - 54_..00 -* - _ -_ -_ -- - -- - I ' 126744 yle 04/23/85 20.00 DELORES SCHMEIDEL REFUND 23- 3410 - 000 -00 __ ..1267.49-- _..____- _041Z31_85. 4-...D-D.- - ELORE3__SCNMETnri CLERICAL CHARGE 23- 3900--Q00 -00 16.00 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85 PAGE 20 CHECK _NC._- DATE._________ `AMOUNT ^- V4N00P,_ -__- I_IE_M D�S- ON ACC9UN.T_10•__INV"._P.O. -#-MESSAGE--- I y 125851 04/23/85 _585 .DO WALKER ENTERPRISE -_ -- __PRINTING. 10- 4600 - 500 -50 126751 04/23/85 45.70 UPT04 ADV= RTISING- ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 125151 04/Z3/P5 45.00 UPTON ADVERTISING ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 126.751 _ ._ 04123/E5___ -- 45.00 f 28 o ? B-� _ -- U.PTOJ�L ADVERTISING ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - v' 125752 _ _04/23/8`.__ _____ - ___ -. 28.50_ - tOL,L= EN?AULUS -_ _ -MEHA ANNUAL 10- 4202_.480- 4.8____ 28.50 126753 .04/23/85 _ 19.00 ____- _DAVI_)__4 YELDE__,_ -- _.!_ ME4AA ANNUAL 10 -4202- 480- 48__ -._ 125 754 04/23/85 19.00 ____ _E.ARL_M.E ICHSNER - -__ -_ _ -__ MECtl MEEZIDIG 10�42C2- 482- 48____ _ 19.0 + 126755 _ 04/23/85 695.52 _ _ OEZURI_K___ -_ REPAIR PARTS 40-4540- _805 -80_ 695.52 • 126756 _ - J4/24/85 _ -- _._____ _ -__ 175.50 _ _ -___ _PARK_NICOLLET_MED_ -- PHr -E.KAM- 175.50 ! 126757 - 04/23/P5.____- -____. - 10.4 -4 -- H -ARCS MAC_NCO G.E_N__3_UPPLIES 10- 4504- 6-4_6 -64 70.44 126758 04/2b/85 _29007.93 _ _PE000_RENTALS INC__ __CWT__i.EPAI.RS 10m4_2_48- 560- 56_ - - -_ - - - - 29007.93 • 125759 - -- - _ 722.60_ KE_Y__C_AQ_ILJ._AC C.2N_LEPAI 10= X2_48 = X60 -56 - - - - - - - - - -- 72203 * 126760 :)4/Z3/95 _ 307.20__- __ZIP_PENN- ______ - -__. _TOOLS 10- 4.580--353- 30____ 307.20 126761, 04/26/85 _639.30 LAN)3CA,PE_BTURF S00_BLAC1�(ZIRT 27 -4562- 662 -66 _.______._________I• 126761 04/23/85 19013.30 LANDSCAPE B TURF PARTS 27- 4620- 662 -66 "l 19652.30 + 126762 04/23/85 540.00 CHRISTA;IN EROS COMP REMOVE TREES 10- 4200 - 353 -30 .,, 540 .10 * 126763 04/Z3/85 - -- 62.37 EBERHARDT CO OYERPATMEhT 40- 3525 - 000 -00 62.37 * 125764 04/23/85 259.53 F•8 E SALES SERVICE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 500 -50 259.50 * - -_ - - --.__ -. -_. 126765 4 ---- 04/23/85 198.40 VIDE) IMAGES CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 198.40 * 126166 04/23/85 155.33 GOVT FINANCE DUES 10- 4204 - 160 -16 155.00 • I::I i' 126767 04/23/8! ^ 12.91 POPULAR COMPUTING CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 12.97 + ^ 1935 _n or coIwA cwEcu ..c-ozorcn 05~01~u^ Pxsc av � °_zmn°-m_p°o°_m-nc�s� � |, __coccK-mQ°_o4Ic - -�� ��� . |^ � 126758 _- 04v23485 zo,.nn_--____nxn� x~��_--- | znv.00 ° c ..|` ' --_°.,^"---_--°,� ~.'..~ ._-_-___-__'__-___'-_ .. arn"/U ° [ . 7 . 126xrQ. J�4zs/-o5-______--__1s�°J�_ 150,00 /. -lcerr1_--�4/2-3��s________-_599"91.-___---L /.' �pn°pv � 126773 0*/24/85 *n°uu uumxm nonnc wn'cp cmrnv 10~2149~000~00 'i _1aurr3__---_o� c°uV __-__-_Wo UO��O �' 62.80 '-',a6rr4._-'_-o*/zA/u5�pn.�m a�_zam� U-oV-_-_''- _- - -- || 195.00 ° - �-- --126.7-75-_-'--J-4/2-41­8 a° oson-__-__-___-__---___._'�j . 26°14 ° .� .1amrrw_-'_u4va4/os_'_-'__��-_na. uauxoom_o mo�m�a-a�__'--- so~r5 ° , / � COPY DURLI-CAT-ING GEN—SURP-LIES 10!-4504-540!- 126779 04/24/85 67o5O COPY DUPLICATING REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-540-54 a*1z ` 126780 04/24/85 45.25 SCHAFER EQUIP Co TOOLS 10-4580-301-30 45.25 ^ ss ao EDWAID LACELLO ROTO TILLER RENTAL 10-4504-390-30 0.4/24/85 10 .64. 10-4160-510-51 c I � �-- 126783 04x24/85 S°z5 wccn--Mo Fnccoon no"xzm Pxnrm 27~4540~*63~6e ' !.. 126784 0.4v2*v85 7*9.51 zon cmuzp RENTAL 10~4226~510~51 ` �a�re� o�xa*vns a�°om �pn ornm� r�o�ua� P�a�a ��~�a�8~aa�~a� ^` w �� � vpmn czrv n.= snzwA _noccn mo°_oAIE__ _ - A.M OU-N.T-��� a*°ao ° coccn ncsznrcm os~nv~ms p«sc ua VENDOR / ' ww°_w-P°m° --- o_ncss AGE --- °°°~cwo i7| _ ma/ur . _g4va6vu5 103.9 �uonzco- oNJ B��&� m�4z�o_�Vo~ro_____ ! Iu68uu �./ 126787 u4/26v85 241.55 mw rxnuxco cnm7 Rspxxnm 28~4248~708~70 - r � �-��—����� u�xa*vns - RADIO EQUIP 345°*9 126788 uW26/85 501.35 pxn zmmrour pxImrs pnzmrzms 10~4600~627~62 - - -- - 501°35 126789 04/2*/85 4*°00 xoxxwwc xaer ccxon ncruxo 23~3500~000~00 ------ M.A*WsP - � 10-4202-421-42 44.00 12679c - ' 04x26/95 - ---- 29921 04 - ------ '------'— rnopzc mzmoo --'- osm SuppLzco '--- --- -- �| 26~*504~688~68 . | - � 29 821°0 4 0000 TECH41CAL GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 -�zur�� - -a*x�o���-----------�,6 577.50 Mr-NN CTY TREASURER ���� Boe' nnucrI ------------� � 165.00 59*50 THE PRINT SHOP / 126792 n4/26ve5 62.50 mrp^ ncnacouxzp 10~*20*~**0-** _ __,__ 12679P3 04/26v85 oax°zo acxcmm pn3m CO ncu suppLxcS��-� 10~*504~642~6* -----�---------/ ~- sam �m ° ° / - 126794 u4v26v85 10-4204-600-60 . � 25"30 ^ � '_ 126795 _-__ o*x2ava» 8"92*.ro 10-2 240~000~00 - / *vLwmo owz AREA anz LEmooma - ' ovvoo.no - - -----'----- --------'---------- ----------'--- ----�� --- ^1 '-126191 r-----U*'/26/85------ ~ HILB 126798 ~ - -- u*vauxoo �1 -- ---- 12uxvv ------ � ' --------- u4�c6vn» Iu68uu �./ 04/26v85 / 126801 0.4/26x85 / - 126802 `j ~i -- -------'-- u*/ao/ux 12-6 8n3 � �-��—����� u�xa*vns � � , --_ ' 113.66 HILB INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23-1209-000-00 .' DOYLE LOCK C 0 10-4914-420-42 RADIO EQUIP 59 .90 45.0.0 M.A*WsP SPRING CCAIFERENCE 10-4202-421-42 55.00 0000 TECH41CAL GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 577.50 Mr-NN CTY TREASURER RADIO EQUIP 10-4914-420-42 59*50 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10-4600-420-42 1901 Y OF EDINA PAM II L CHECK GISTER 05-01 PAGE 23 126817 CHECK 126817 U.4/30/85 v E�R�OQ4 ITEM LJ)ts_c R r P T r a AC-COLUNT-NO e-I N V a_J_P.* 0 M E S S AGE.— J EANING ART CIR 71m,4200_-61_0-61 —50-4214-822-82 20*30 MN 200.00 ADVERTISING 50-4214-842-84 .,--.126815----.U4/3U./85---.--346..22- MN ___12680.4__. B LACX-10p 10-4532-301-30 50-4214-862-86 ____MP_kL_I_ND_U_S_TRlE.S___ _GU_lP PAINT 10- _4.214-420- .4- 2— __- .___- ._ -__. GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-803-80 44.35 • 126816 04/30/85 55*28 MARILYN MUELLER LICENSE PROCESSING 10-4200- 500- 50 55.28 • 12 6 80.5 ______0_4 /Z6/ _578.46 __S_H EW F S_ —PDQM & B ARD 10 -42 6 -22D_22 570.46 126806 _U4f26f8_5______.__ —1 7*50____._A_UTo_s.QU_Na ----EQUIP HATNT 17.50 1268C?-- 105*00---AM.-LU43-ASSDC--------SUB-Sir-HIP-TION _10 �_4.202 m420 -t4 2 105.00 UNI-EnRM Al I nU 10- 4266- 422-42 149.95 ____402 *O0lZ.RSaB_EN___ rn NY SERV 402.00 * __04/30_/85____ --9o-92 RMS _3_EF_U_E_ST_Of _S_ 10-A_2_48.-_520w_52____ 9.92 * ------ A_RELkRA_aUB D T R P A Y M E N I 40- 3525_-D0.0mt(Ln 27.00 • 12 6 6 1 2____ __0 4 /.30 1.85 _165.00. .1:D -LNL EMPL a YEE S-CLU B S UP. P L I r q 1 nn450_4_50 0-5 0___ 165.00 ".._._- .126813 - 04-/30 »5__ - PAM II L A MM UNI=N 29 --4-M ---? 2- 0ml 2- 126817.- _____..04/30/8_5 126817 2,052.13 126817 U.4/30/85 __126 814 04/30/85 __.__20 0 .3D-- R0Hi08LDYIAK J EANING ART CIR 71m,4200_-61_0-61 —50-4214-822-82 20*30 MN 200.00 ADVERTISING 50-4214-842-84 .,--.126815----.U4/3U./85---.--346..22- MN En KIA.EME1 A-S.ONS B LACX-10p 10-4532-301-30 50-4214-862-86 126815 04/30/85 363*77 ED KRAEMEI & SONS GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-803-80 709.99 126816 04/30/85 55*28 MARILYN MUELLER LICENSE PROCESSING 10-4200- 500- 50 55.28 • 126817 (14/30/85 126817 04/30/85 126817.- _____..04/30/8_5 126817 04/30/E5 126817 U.4/30/85 126818 04/30/85 126819 04/30/85 15*00• MN JAYCEES CORRECTICN 10-4214-822-82 1503 MN JAYCEES ADVERTISING 10-4214-822-82 __.__15.c0__MN_JkYCEE_S _ADV_ERT.IS_IJXG —50-4214-822-82 20*30 MN JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50-4214-842-84 20*00 MN JA;YC-7ES ADVERTISING 50-4214-862-86 CC nn 90.43 RV ASSOC GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-520-52 2,530.1D SOUTAERN T'"UMDER FIG SKATING 10-2235-000-00 7-nin in � 126820 04/30/85 37000 SECOA RENTALS FIG SKATING 10-2235-000-00 7 i 1985 czry OF cnnxA c*ccn ncsxorsm os~n,~es pxsc 24 | Cxccx]mn°_oArc__ mmY—mo°-zmw°_J-.e°o.-wncSoAsc__-�/ ' va6uzn 04/30/85 86.50 SECOA RENTALS FIG SKATm 10-2 2 35- 000-00 | �,m », | ' .'/ 126821 ! p�. 2-4 ` _i x v2aca 04 /3U 371.25 sncn LWSmMxm nxmwc owppLzco 27~4637~663~66 ` vaaxuz J4/3O/F5 2 9303.4* oEorLImIE GOLF upLY wxmsc muppLzco 27~4637~663~66 / 12662* 04v30/85 172°50 xrw I,Nc zmSwxmcE 10~4260~510~51 � —1y2 ,5 0_ 126825 34o0/8 5 49.5o cmrcc xwxEm`nnv muppLzcn 23~1209~000~00 49~5.0*- _ ,aouzo 04v3uv85 s,ouo.on pourMxorsI pnorxac 10~4290~510~51 '_-_--3 9 000.1o_�____________________________ _ 17 05/01/85 149836.74 `."^=� "^"""" °"C" C°N^^nwC/Ivw 27-1300-000 -00 - U5/01/85 — 43.60 '-^ ~'~'^ ~^^ ^"VE~^~`, 10-4632-862 -86 ~ _ - | --- 05/01/85 ~'^~~ "~^^E" "°-~E"" ""° 'S^ AID SUPPLIES 10-4510-44a -44 / ' ---3 3 _ 12 683u 05 /0.1/85 110.30 BE BE RcmacL pnmp scRxzccs �o~oaos~ou�~Po |� .. _ I e*o3n 05/01/85 23509 urn^xa noScoc cnwu7xwcT/nm e0~1 300~202~04 ^ | 235.99 126832 __-..-- .`'.'~^. "°.. ^~°^="~^~" °c""ICE^ 10 *2 20- 260-26 ' - | ---- ~-'~''~' '~°~~ " IF " «E*/^/°»/zom 10-4202- 240-24 - ' �oa s� � u 0,5/0t/85 118.95 sm^mm xzsw L000c compcmcmcc 10~4202~240~24 -| _ OLIVER --..^-- -^.-.~ 10-4 200-353-3" .'. ' 126836 . -''-./— 306*90 .~ ~...E ."^~" dE"° ,cx°I/ 10~+310~358~30 � _ l vuoxx/ osvunvon 103.53 ouuAw momnE nmo 10-2149-030- 00 .- --_-_ IU3.50 ' - � 126839 ou/01xo5 17.50 ourm ouumovEm7mumzn cuwT ncPxxno 10~4248~560~56 � .~ ^ yccncAvzmw ocmzsm Fumn 2 2,169.90 F Fumo 29 TOTAL o oum aAmoc Fmmo v,aas° o o_o 0_rnr« L W . puwo on TOTAL u Ygc , OF cozm^ poxo so TOTAL L LImuon ozoPcmsxnn FUND cxsc. azo7sy 05~m~ pxsc an ' [ cwccn_m --- -'---' --'- mmx—mo°-Tmu°_m-e°p° w-mcSs4ac r- <` ''~'~ ' " 126839 � 89.24 ~ � - L ---- ----------------'---'----'-' 12684u 05/01/85 91 6.00 916 .OD | . 126841 o vul 5 59.31 ~ � . 59.31 � .. 126842 05/01 /85 163 n °.` ..~°~. . � ic « ' - -'--- vouum --'-- - oxvnm/nx - -------------'----'-- r,uro.Jm Joc mnucPwsm uxmca ------'- 27~4100~675~66 �.' r,oro°ao ! | 12684 '` m | � ' 126845 ---0.5v01/n5�---'2^9r8.00—��--�cL'PAINT pxzwr 10~45*4-335- 30 ------`� ~, 29973.10 ° 13`� ^°°~cmn | � 1749In*"64 povn vo rorxL ocmcnxL rumm ` | � 'o2°sn_-______Fumo_zo_rmrxL__-_____- PARK. non 39261.77 pnwo on TOTAL Apr ccmrcn � ! � pmx o� , ~ as.nwp'`r ro:o eo rnm� �wn rr rnr". ouzwm�mo poo� puwo �".r ,°"""� c,.m" =� |`| ../ ,--__-_ ._-.''-. 3,737.18 p povn 28 TOTAL y yccncAvzmw ocmzsm Fumn 2 2,169.90 F Fumo 29 TOTAL o oum aAmoc Fmmo v,aas° o o_o 0_rnr« L W WATER FUND � 1 949166°28 p puwo on TOTAL u urzLz7v pumo 3 3,414.29 p poxo so TOTAL L LImuon ozoPcmsxnn FUND L19 --------- ' - �J |-/ !" l ' �1 8PFi%_oV[cD) FC,,rAYNENT ----------'---'----------- c��������� - - --'-- ------- fE-�'--- --- --------- ^~~~^�~~�^~'--"�rc--------- � � � � � |�|�