HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-05-06_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / EDINA COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MAY 6, 1985
7:00 P.M.
JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of April 1, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARING - Amendments - Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
A. Resolution - Edina HRA
B. Resolution - Edina City Council
II. PUBLIC HEARING - Sale of Land in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area
A. Action by Edina HRA - Sale of Land
B. Action by Edina City Council - Consent to Redevelopers' Agreement
III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
A. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 -
Edinborough - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west
of York Avenue
B. Preliminary Plat
1. The Village in Edina - Generally located south of West 76th Street and
west of York Avenue
IV. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - HRA /City of Edina
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, approved as submitted
or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions,
Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Lot Division
B.
1. Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor - 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane
Set Hearing Dates (5/20/85)
1. PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located
in the northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street
2. Final Development Plan.- Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems -
Generally located west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street
3. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District -
Generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue
4. Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert -
7010 France Ave. So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1,
Stow's Edgemoor Addition
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Two Traffic Control Signal Systems (Eng 485 -2)
B. Public Improvements - BA -263, P -14, P -15 and 85 -3 (Eng 485 -3)
C. Concrete Curb and Gutter 85 -4 - Arneson Park (Eng 485 -4)
D. Weed Harvesting - Mill Pond /Mirror Lake
E. Administrative Vehicle
F. Radio Base Station - Fire Department
G. Public Officials Liability Insurance /Police Professional Liability Insurance
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Release of City Property - Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition
B. Plan Approval - Hennepin County /Crosstown Ramp
C. Homart Development of France Avenue Drive -In Theatre - Bloomington
D. West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive Traffic Signal
E. Policy on Sale of Park Property
F. City Insurance Renewals
G. Legislative Breakfast - May 24 - 7:30 a.m.
H. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
I. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Agenda
Edina City Council /HRA
May 6, 1985
Page Two
V. FINANCE.
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for.payment of the
following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50,
Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming Pool Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07,
Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range ;Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265.58,
Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Cohstruct16n Fund
$19,721.04, Total $459,947.19.
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY / EDINA COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MAY 6, 1985
7:00 P.M.
JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL 14EETING
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of April 1, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARING - Amendments - Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
A. Resolution - Edina HRA
B. Resolution - Edina City Council
II. PUBLIC HEARING - Sale of Land in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area
A. Action by Edina HRA.- Sale of Land
B. Action by Edina City Council - Consent to Redevelopers' Agreement
.III. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
A. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 -
Edinborough - Generally located south of West 76th Street and west
of York Avenue
B. Preliminary Plat
1. The Village in Edina - Generally located south of West 76th Street and
west of York Avenue
IV. AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT - HRA /City of Edina
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, approved as submitted
or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions,
Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions
require action by Resolution. '3 /5.favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Lot Division
1. Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor - 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane
B. Set Hearing Dates (5/20/85)
1. PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located
in the northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street
2. Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems -
Generally located west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street
3. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District -
Generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue
4. Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert -
7010 France Ave. So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1,
Stow's Edgemoor Addition
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Two Traffic Control Signal Systems (Eng X685 -2)
B. Public Improvements - BA -263, P -14, P -15 and 85 -3 (Eng 485 -3)
C. Concrete Curb and Gutter 85 -4 - Arneson Park (Eng 485 -4)
D. Weed Harvesting - Mill Pond /Mirror Lake
E. Administrative Vehicle
F. Radio Base Station - Fire Department
G. Public Officials Liability Insurance /Police Professional Liability Insurance
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Release of City Property - Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition
B. Plan Approval - Hennepin County /Crosstown Ramp
C. Homart Development of France Avenue Drive -In Theatre - Bloomington
D. West 70th Street /Cornelia Drive Traffic Signal
E. - Policy on Sale of Park Property
F. City Insurance Renewals
G. Legislative Breakfast - May 24 - 7:30 a.m.
H. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
I. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Agenda
Edina City Council /HRA
May 6, 1985
Page Two
V. FINANCE.
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the
following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50,
Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming P6ol.Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07,
Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265:58,
Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Construction Fund
$19,721.04, Total $459,947.19.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 15, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Turner, and Mayor Courtney. (Member Bredesen
arrived at 7:20 p.m.)
RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION FOR EDINA HIGH SCHOOL TEAMS ADOPTED. Mayor Courtney pre-
sented the following resolutions of commendation for Edina High School athletic teams
which were unanimously adopted:
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' SWIM TEAM
WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Swim Team won the 1984 Conference, Section, and State
Championships; and
WHEREAS, success in these Championships has been the result of their extra - ordinary
ability, hours of practice and dedication to the sport; and
WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have
brought to the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations
be extended to member of the team: Martha Baumgartner, Sara Bergman, Tara Bergman,
Victoria Dow, Trish Franciosi, Jenni Frandeen, Emma Garforth, Lori Heisick, Kirstin
Kendig, Karen Kozar, Kirsten Larsen, Mindy Mikan, Maura Ries, Stephanie Seveland,
Lyn Tierney, Claudia Vieira, Lori Wilbur and Ann Wohlrabe, and to thecCoaches
Ann Anklam and Michael Daly.,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes
Book of the Edina City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the
Championship Team.
ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985.
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' TENNIS TEAM
WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Tennis Team won the 1984 Lake Conference, Section VI, and
State Championships; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Girls' Tennis Team established an enviable record in the State
Tournament by winning the Singles Championship and Doubles Championship, and success
has been the result of their special ability, hours of practice and dedication to
the sport; and
WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have
brought to the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations
be extended to members of the team; Kelly Anderson, Laura Bassinger, Suzanne Blietz,
Aileen Furlong, Martha Goldberg, Ginger Helgeson, Michelle Houser, Jennifer Moe
and Jennifer Nelson and to Coaches, Charles Anderson and Bruce Clare; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes
Book of the Edina City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the
Championship team.
ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985.
. RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' GYMNASTICS TEAM
WHEREAS, the Edina Boys' Grmnastics Team won the 1984 State Championship, and
completed an outstanding season of performances; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Boys' Gymnastics Team has won its second State Championship; and
WHEREAS, success in the State Tournament has been the result of their special ability,
dedication to the sport, and for their behavior in a manner reflecting the credit
they have brought to the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere congratulations
be extended to the members of the team: Frank Barnes, Jonathan DeLeon, David Engh,
Timothy Fulford, Erik Gl6erson, Charles Lim, Matthew Maguire, Christopher Nelms,
Bruce Nordstog, Steven Petry, Troy Stende, Lam Truong and Coaches Bob Hoecherl and
and Bert Selsbach.'
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes
Book of the Edina City Council and that appropriate copies be given to members of
the Championship team.
ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985.
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS' GYMNASTICS TEAM
WHEREAS, the Edina High School Girls' Gymnastics Team has completed a successful
1984 season, winning the Lake Conference, Region 6AA, and State Championships; and
WHEREAS, members of the team behaved in a manner reflecting the credit they have
brought to the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their special ability,
hours of practice, and the leadership of their Coaches; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, on behalf
of the Citizenry as a whole, that all members of the Edina Girls' Gymnastics Team
be publicly commended for their outstanding accomplishments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be presented to the members
of the Championship Team: Sarah Anderson, Jennifer Ducar, Toni Manske, Kelly Meredith,
wrl
4/15/85
Melanie Peacock, Jody Shanedling, Tiffany Utendorfer, Michelle Wise, and to
the Coaches, Kit Olson and John Reardon.
ADOPTED this 15th day of April, 1985.
BICYCLE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAIMED. Mayor Courtney read the following proclamation
for Bicycle Safety Week:
BICYCLE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAMATION
As Mayor of the City of Edina, I call upon all members of this community to give
their wholehearted support to the 22nd Annual Edina Bicycle Safety Program
which has traditionally been sponsored under the united efforts of various Edina
civic organizations.
The purpose of the Program is to- reduce the hazard of bicycle riding for young
bicyclists, as well as for pedestrians and motorists. The growing congestion
of our streets and highways daily increases the dangers for the careless or
unskilled rider. Reports of hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries each
year throughout our nation (due to collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles
along) have alerted us to the need for such a Program. By training our boys and
girls, at an early age, in proper riding skill, by teaching them the laws govern-
ing bicyclists, by explaining the reasons for obeying safety rules and by helping
them to be aware of the hazards of biking, we feel that Edina is making a concerted
attempt to assure that the number of accidents does NOT keep up with the ever -
increasing number of bicyclists.
The energy crisis may even now be creating the need for our adults to use their
bicycles as a means of transportation for short haul errands. It behooves us
all to become thoroughly familiar with the "rules of the road" to minimize the
incident of accidents. We should all remember that a bike is no longer just a
toy, but a vehicle to be taken seriously.
The safety of our children cannot be relegated to a once -a -year campaign. I call
for the support of every parent in carrying out this campaign all year long and
I urge every youngster to participate in this Bicycle Safety Program and then to
practice what he has learned - for his safety as well as for the safety of others.
As Mayor of Edina, I hereby proclaim the week of May 5th to be Bicycle Safety
Week in Edina.
PROCLAIMED this 15th day of April, 1985.
ROGER SORENSON COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Roger Sorenson and said that
Mr. Sorenson has been employed with the City since 1965 and -that he will be..
retiring on April 22. He has worked in the Park Department as a Light Equipment
Operator and has been a dedicated, hard - working employee. Mr. Rosland_commended
him-for his many years of fine service to the City and presented him with a
silver pen bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council joined in thanking
and commending Mr. Sorenson for his outstanding employment record.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 AUTHORIZED. Affidavits
of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer
Hoffman advised that last November the residents of Westwood Court, located off
Schaeffer Road, had presented a petition for watermain extention improvement.
Proposed construction would be to loop the watermain extention around Westwood
Court back to Schaeffer Road. The improvement would require excavation of the
street in order to construct the watermain extention and then the reconstruction
of the street. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated cost of construction for Watermain
Improvement No. P -WM -353 at $65,734.60, proposed to be assessed against 12.assess-
able lots....at.$5,617.95 per lot, with.-credit to Lot 8, Block 1, Westwood Court of
$1,680.74. If.approved;.construction of this improvement could be accomplished
in 1985. Assessments would then be levied in.1986 with the initial installment
due in 1987. The improvement is proposed to be assessed over a ten year period,
with an annual rate of interest to be charged on the unpaid balance not to exceed
the amount allowed by law. -The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 8,
Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court. No comment or objection being
heard, Member Turner moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION ORDERING
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly publi hed and mailed to owners
of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed
improvement:
1. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 IN THE FOLLOWING:
Westwood Court
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council
has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised
of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of
said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent
domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and
maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and
shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353
` 4/15/85
and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include:
Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots l thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION. Planner Gordon Hughes recalled
that the Council gave preliminary approval to the plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition,
generally located west of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway, as origi-
nally submitted at its meeting of June 18, 1984. Later the plat was amended to
include some additional portion of the Cross View Lutheran Church property. Council
approved the revised Mat on December 17, 1984. The proponent has now returned with
the final plat and is seeking final plat approval and rezoning approval. Mr. Hughes
recalled that Lots 1 thru 7 of the plat are proposed for R -2 zoning; the balance of
the lots 8 thru 15 will be single family lots; Lot 16 is retained in church ownership.
Several months ago a conditional use permit was granted to facilitate the expansion'
of the church. Preliminary plat approval was granted, subject to these conditions:
1) subdivision dedication, 2)developer's agreement, 3) conservation restriction covering
the wetland area, 4) grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer extensions, 5) grant
of D.N.R. permit, and 6) petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and
gutter on McCauley Trail West. Mr. Hughes stated that all the conditions have been
complied with except for the conservation restriction. The executed conservation
restriction has not been received and the final plat approval should include -.that as
a condition. He pointed out that the final plat defines that area as a drainage
and utility easement, but the conservation restriction would add other restrictions
as to what could be done in the area. A subdivision dedication report has been pre-
pared by staff and final plat approval and rezoning is recommended. Mr. Hughes noted
that final rezoning requires a 4/5 favorable vote of the Council and that the rezoning
could be continued to the meeting of May 6, 1985 if Member Bredesen did not appear.
No objection or comments being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution
and moved adoption, subject to receipt of an executed conservation restriction and
payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $22,000'.00:
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain
plat entitled "Indian Hills 2nd Addition" platted-by The Minnesota South District of
the Lutheran Church- Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit corporation, and Indian
Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting
of the City Council of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
resented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the
petition for preliminary plat approval for the William C. Hansen Addition, generally
located south of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive. The proponent is requesting
a two -lot subdivision of the property resulting in one new building site. The new
lot would measure approximately 92 x 121 feet and contain 11,137 square feet.in area.
The subject property measures approximately 200 x 121 feet and is 24,206 square feet
in area. It is developed wi -th a single dwelling fronting on Johnson Drive and located
on the southerly portion of the.site. The lot retained for the existing dwelling
would measure 108 x 121 feet _and would be 13,069 square feet in area. The dwelling
on.:the site complies in all.respects with the zoning ordinance from the standpoint of
lot coverage and setback from the new lot line. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the
dwelling on the site is served with sanitary sewer and water from Grove Street. It
would be necessary to relocate these services if a dwelling were constructed on the
new lot. The proponent has agreed to the relocation of those utility lines to a new
easement provided along the east property line. The Community Development and Plan-
ning Commission reviewed the plat on March 27., 1985, and recommended approval of the
subdivision, subject to 1) subdivision dedication, 2) relocation of existing utilities,
3) relocation of existing driveway to Johnson Drive. The proponent has agreed to
relocate the utilities and driveway prior to final plat approval. In response to a
question of Member Turner regarding lot size in the neighborhood, Mr. Hughes stated
that neighboring lots are comparable in size. No objections or comments being heard,
Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to
1) subdivision dedication, 2) relocation of existing utilities prior to final plat
approval, and 3) relocation of existing driveway:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR WILLIAM C. HANSEN ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain
plat entitled "William C. Hansen Addition ", platted by William C. Hansen and Patricia
G. Hansen, husband and wife, and Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan Association, a
)fib
4/15/85
Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council
of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
(Member Bredesen entered the meeting at this point on the Council Agenda.)
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR EDINA HIGHPOINTE II.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
Mr. Hughes presented the request for preliminary plat approval and final deve-
lopment plan approval for Edina Highpointe II, generally located West of Cahill
Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended. The subject property measures
2 1/2 acres in area and is presently occupied with two single - family dwellings.
Mr. Hughes stated that this is one of the few essentially vacant properties in
the City that was zoned in connection with the new Zoning Ordinance adopted in
March, 1984. Prior to that time this property was zoned R -3 Multiple Residential
District. The property was rezoned to PRD -3 Planned Residential District in
conjunction with the enactment of the new Ordinance with the provision that the
Community Development and Planning Commission and the Council must approve final
development plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. The applicant has
thus submitted the final development plans for.review and approval. Mr..Hughes
said that the final plans include a site plan, grading plan, floor plans and
elevation drawings. A 26 -unit condominium building, which equates to 10 1/2 units
per acre, is proposed for the site. The proposed building will be complementary
in terms of style and materials to the applicant's 16 -unit condominium building,
Edina Highpointe II, locate&-directly to the north. Mr. Hughes pointed out that
the site grades from an elevation of 872 at the northeast corner to 838 at the
southwest corner. The applicant has designed a building that steps down from
the north to the south to take advantage of this slope. The result of this design
is in essence two 3 -story buildings which are joined at the lobby area. The
lowest floor of the northerly portion of the building in nine feet higher than
the lowest floor of the southerly portion of the building. This results in a
building which is four stories in height at the lobby. The Zoning Ordinance
limits building height to three stories in PRD -3. Therefore, a variance is
required. All other aspects of the project comply with the Ordinance. The
applicant has also submitted a one -lot plat of the project as required by the
Zoning Ordinance. As reported to the Planning Commission, staff believes that
the final development plans represent the same exceptional quality as the High -
point project to the north. The only modification of the plans requested is
to increase slightly the radius of the front driveway to meet the requirements
of the Fire Department. Staff would also recommend that the variance be granted
for the four -story element of the building, based on these reasons: 1) the
applicant has attempted to design a building which is sympathetic to the topo-
graphy of the site, 2) the four -story condition occurs at only one corner of
the rear of the building, and 3) that an excellent design will be fostered by
the grant of this variance. Staff thus recommends final development plan approval
and preliminary plat approval, subject to 1) final platting, 2) subdivision
dedication, and 3) review of the final grading plan by the Engineering Department
prior to issuance of a building permit to assure proper drainage. Mr. Hughes
stated that Ron Clark, proponent, was present to answer any questions. Member
Turner asked if-the landscaping plan meets our criteria because of the close
proximity of the buildings, and also asked what the distance was from the pro-
posed building to the closest Oak Glen building. Mr. Hughes replied that the
same size landscaping material is expected as was used on the first Highpointe
building which generally has been oversized material. He pointed out that the
proposed building maintains a 35 -foot setback, that the closest Oak Glen build-
ing also has a "35 -foot setback, thus providing a 70 -foot space between the two
buildings. No comments or objection being heard, Member Turner moved adoption
of the following resolutions for preliminary plat approval and for final deve-
lopment plan approval, including granting of the variance for the four -story
portion of the building:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT
APPROVAL FOR EDINA HIGHPOINTE II
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Highpointe II ", platted by Ronald E. Clark, and presented
at the regular meeting of the City_Council of April 15, 1985, be and is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval, subject to final platting and subdivision
dedication.
RF.g0T.T1TTI)N
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
Final Development Plan for Edina Highpointe II, generally located west of Cahill
Road and north of Amundson Avenue extended, be and is hereby approved, subject
to review.of the final grading plan by the Engineering Department prior to
issuance of a building permit.
\a\
4./15/85
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly.
Member Turner commented that, in terms of the variance, she had made the motion
for approval because of the topography of the site and the uniqueness of the
building design.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolutions adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR FINAL REZONING - VILLAGES IN EDINA (EDINBOROUGH). As recom-
mended by staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen setting
May 6, 1985, as the hearing date for the final rezoning for Villages in Edina, the
new proposed name for the Edinborough project.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO 825 -A4 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING; R -2 ZONING APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS
2ND ADDITION. Mayor Courtney stated that, with the arrival of Member Bredesen, the -
Council would now hear the request for final rezoning of Indian Hills 2nd Addition,
generally located west of Gleason Road and south of the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Hughes
recalled that the request is for rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to
R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District for Lots 1 thru 7,.Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd Addi-
tion. The final plat which was approved by the Council earlier in the meeting was for
a sixteen lot subdivision with Lots 1 thru 7 proposed for R -2 zoning, Lots 8 thru 15
will be single family lots and Lot 16 is retained in church ownership. Staff would
recommend that final rezoning.be granted. No comment being heard, Member Turner
moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A4 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the
following thereto:
"The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) is enlarged by the
addition of the following property:
Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd Addition."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
VACATION GRANTED FOR PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on.file. Mr. Hoffman presented
the petition of the owner of Outlot A, Edina Green, for vacation of a portion of
the Lincoln Drive right of way. He explained.that the area requested to be vacated
is part of an old right of way for Lincoln Drive which was vacated approximately
ten years ago. The property owner is now asking for release of the old right of way
over a portion of Outlot A. Northern States Power Company has asked that an existing
10 foot front easement be retained to protect their existing underground cable.
Staff would recommend that the vacation be granted, subject to reserving the author -
ity.of Northern States Power.Company to maintain their underground cable line. No
objection being heard, Member Bredesen moved adoption of the following resolution,
with the condition that the 10 foot front easement be reserved in favor of Northern
States Power Company:
RESOLUTION VACATING
PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 25th day of February, 1985,
fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of portion of Lincoln Drive
right of way; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the
hearing was held on the 15th day of April, 1985, at which time all persons desiring
to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to, be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said street vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects exist-
ing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation
lam
4/15/85
affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or
controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines or water
pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street easement or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend
thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Henne-
pin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the Lincoln Drive
right of way be and is hereby vacated effective as of April 16, 1985:
That part of Lot 4, Block 2, and of Outlot A, Edina Green lying within a
60 foot road easement as per Document No. 3909691. Said road easement is
described as follows:
Beginning at a point in the North line of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Section 31, distant 185 feet West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood
Knolls 15th Addition; thence South parallel with the Southerly extention
of the West line of said Addition 23.31 feet; thence Southwesterly 196.66
feet along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 440.1 feet;
thence Southerly 198.54 feet along a reverse curve having a radius of
672.63 feet; thence Southerly tangent to last described curve 85 feet;
thence Southeasterly 280.36 feet along a tangential curve to the left
having a radius of 318.42 feet; thence Southeasterly tangent to last
described curve 205.5 feet; thence Southerly 331.88 feet along a tangential
curve to the right having a radius of 275.72 feet; thence Southwesterly
tangent to last described curve 112.74 feet; thence Southerly 284.14 feet
along a tangential curve to the left having a radius of 370 feet to the
center line of Lincoln Drive as platted in the-plat of Nine Mile North and
there terminating.
PROVIDED, however, that after due consideration, the Council has determined and
hereby specifies that the foregoing vacation shall not affect, and there is
hereby continued, reserved, and retained, the following existing easement and
authority in, on, and under the above vacated area:
The City of Edina reserves in favor of Northern States Power Company an
existing ten foot front utility easement within said described vacated
street for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for
otherwise attending to, underground cable lines required to provide
electric service to customers along this route, and
that the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of
proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor,
and filed with the Register of Deeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR STREET SWEEPER.. Mr. Rosland presented tabluation of bids for
purchase of a street sweeper showing Itasca Equipment Company at $59,913.00,
MacQueen Equipment, Inca at $62,830.00 and Sweeney Brothers Tractor, Inc. at
$71,960.00. Staff would recommend award of bid to MacQueen Equipment, Inc.
because Itasca's bid does not meet the bid specifications in many areas. It
was noted that Itasca Equipment Company has been advised of the recommendation.
No comment being heard, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly
for award of bid for street sweeper to MacQueen Equipment, Inc. at $62,830.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TORO GROUNDSMASTER FOR GOLF COURSE. Mr. Rosland presented tabu-
lation of bids'for purchase of a Toro Groundsmaster showing MTI Distributing
Company at $6,344.00, Cushman Motor Company at $6,720.00 and Goulds, Inc. at
$6,805.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of
bid to recommended low bidder MTI Distributing Company at $6,344.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 4/9/85 APPROVED; RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN
SUPPORT OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT WEST 78TH STREET /BUSH LAKE ROAD. Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action
as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 9, 1985:
1) That the Edina City Council adopt and forward a resolution to the Hennepin
County Board supporting the installation of traffic signals at West 78th
Street and Bush Lake Road,
2) That the City enhance signing and striping on Cahill Road to establish clear
right turn and left turn lanes,
4/15/85.
3) That the City enhance signing and striping on West 78th Street to include a
right turn lane to northbound Cahill Road and a "SIGNAL YOUR TURN" sign for
the same traffic movement,
4) That the Traffic Safety Committee should monitor and review all new data deve-
loped on the intersection,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, development along 78th Street in Edina and Bloomington has caused heavy
traffic congestion, and
WHEREAS, a traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street would alle-
viate some of that congestion, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes that traffic signal warrants are met at said
intersection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council hereby urges the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners to take positive action, along with Blooming-
ton, for the installation of traffic signals at East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th
Street at the earliest possible opportunity.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
SLIDE PRESENTATION GIVEN ON LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT. Mr. Rosland introduced George K.
Isaacs, Technical Advisor -Light Rail Transit, who gave a slide presentation on
Light Rail Transit (LRT). He defined LRT as a transit system using rail cars elec-
trically powered from an overhead wire, on preferential rights of way. The slides
showed various LRT systems in operation in the United States, Canada and Europe.
Mr. Isaacs pointed out the-following advantages of LRT systems: stations are simple;
helps reduce pollution in downtown areas; is fast, comfortable and reliable in all
weather; will reduce the total subsidy need of the MTC in the metro area; is labor
productive and for riders, fares and transfer privileges will be the same as for
buses. University Avenue is little used for vehicle traffic because of I -94 and
could be the first corridor of 9.5 miles costing approximately $120M; the second
corridor could be Hiawatha Avenue and the Southwest corridor could be the third line.
Estimated costs for the 36 mile LRT system proposed for the three corridors is
$363M. LRT will cost about $10M per mile for track, vehicles, stations, parking lots,
etc. For comparison, I -394 will cost about $40 M per mile. Mr. Isaacs noted that
LRT will not replace buses but will supplement buses and highways. LRT relies on
buses or vans to collect riders and feed traffic to the LRT trains. LRT.cons *_ruction
is.proposed to be financed from existing tax revenues, mostly from a portion of the
existing state motor vehicle excise tax already devoted to transit, and the existing
transit property tax levy. Mayor Courtney thanked Mr. Isaacs for.the presentation.
No Council action was taken.
PLAN CONCEPT APPROVED FOR IMPROVEMENT TO RAMP FROM T.H. 100 TO EASTBOUND CROSSTOWN HWY.
Mr. Hoffman recalled that about two years ago the Council had asked the Hennepin. County
Board of Commissioners to make some safety improvements to the Crosstown Highway on the
section from the east boundary of the City to Tracy Avenue which has experienced the
highest accident rate in the City. The County has proposed five improvements to the
highway, one of which is to redesign the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound
Crosstown to bring it more gradually into the flow of traffic and to provide an
acceleration lane. Mr. Hoffman showed a- graphic of the proposed improvement which
showed that the ramp would use a portion of the frontage road area which is under the
jurisdiction of the City. Hennepin County is requesting that the City allow usage of
the frontage road area for construction of the safety improvement. As a result, the
realignment would bring the ramp closer to the adjacent homes with the new fence
moved inward approximately 10 feet between the ramp and the new fence. Mr. Hoffman
reported that City and County staff members had met with area residents on March 29
to hear their concerns, their major concerns being noise levels and proximity of the
ramp to their homes. Staff conclusion and recommendation is as follows: 1) For the
proposed improvment, separate the issues of safety and noise, 2) As to safety,
approve the proposed plan with the understanding that the County will incur all
cost except landscaping and privacy fences, 3) The Council should consider to what
extent additional privacy fences and /or landscaping would be done to improve screen-
ing at least along the Murphy and Stang residences, and 4) If Council wishes,
conduct additional fact finding from all residents along the Crosstown Highway 62
and Highway 100 as to attitudes on sound walls and interest in financing same.
Ted Hoffman, Chief Design Engineer with Hennepin County, stated that it is the
policy of Hennepin County to not retro -fit any County highways with sound barriers.
He pointed out that if a noise wall were to be constructed at the location it would
have to be approximately 1,100 feet in length to isolate the three homes at an
estimated cost of $100 per lineal foot. The proposed ramp redesign is a "tag along"
I Q `/
4/15/85
project for some resurfacing and curve correction to the Crosstown Highway. With
regard to the safety /noise issues, Mr. Ted Hoffman said that the redesign should
eliminate the accidents caused by people over - reacting when entering the east-
bound Crosstown Highway traffic because of no taper area in which to accelerate,
and the noise source is the Crosstown Highway itself. Appearing and speaking in
support of the neighborhood petition requesting erection of a sound barrier wall
to protect and buffer the neighborhood were Philip Dugan, 6324 Parnell Avenue;
Donald Stang, 6320 West Shore Drive; Fred Johnson, 4717 W. 64th Street; and
James Ewald, 6321 Parnell Avenue. Mr. Ted Hoffman clarified that if the Council
did not approval the plan for the ramp the County would not redesign it and
would only work on the other other proposed improvements on the Crosstown itself.
Member Turner stated that she felt the neighbors' concerns about safety and noise
were separate issues. With regard to the safety issue, she asked that the County
look at constructing a guard rail at that area. Member Turner stated the noise
issue involves a policy decision for the Council and would require time to explore
it. Member Bredesen said he agreed with Member Turner and that information should
be provided that would indicate to the Council and the neighbors whether or not
a guard rail would reduce the possibility of vehicle accidents. He added that the
noise abatement issue could involve enormous costs and that discussion should be
pursued at.the State and Federal level as to possible solutions. Member Bredesen
then moved concept approval of the proposed plan for the eastbound ramp from
T.H. 100 to Crosstown 62, with the contingency that the.County provide additional
safety information and options to the City Engineer to be reported back to the
Council, together with possible options for resolving the noise issue. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HOMART DEVELOPMENT OF FRANCE AVENUE DRIVE -IN THEATRE DISCUSSED. Planner Craig
Larsen recalled that the Homart development of the France Avenue Drive -in Theatre
in Bloomington had been discussed at the last Council meeting as to its impact on
Edina from a traffic and aesthetic standpoint. Since then, staff has investigated
ways in which the City may influence the magnitude of the proposed development.
The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process has commenced and on April 2 staff
members attended the scoping meeting to request that certain items be studied
thoroughly. It was requested that the impact caused by vacant land in Edina be
included in the EIS analysis for traffic on France Avenue and I -494; primarily
the 85 -90 acres of undeveloped land owned by Hedberg & Sons Company. Mr. Larsen
noted that the Metropolitan Council has asked that the available sewer capacity
be studied. Except for a required grading permit from the Nine Mile Creek Water-
shed District, the only permits the development requires are from the Pollution
Control Agency (PCA). The major concern of the PCA is likely to be air pollution
caused by the increased traffic. The City's request to consider the development
of Edina's vacant land in the analysis could have a significant effect; however,
the PCA is required only to consider the subject development. Staff has provided
Bloomington with data indicating expected development intensities of vacant land
in the area. With regard to the requirements and process for a review of metro-
politan significance by the Metropolitan Council, a resolution by the City Council
would be necessary to initiate the process. If the Metropolitan Council finds
the development to be of metropolitan significance, it could delay construction
of the project for up to one year and could identify modifications which, if
complied with, would cause the construction suspension to be lifted. Mr. Larsen
pointed out that if the City's concerns are not addressed or answered by the EIS,
we can object on the basis that the EIS is inadequate. However, this decision
is made by the Bloomington City Council. If Bloomington finds that the EIS is
adequate and they are able to secure PCA permits, they would not be further
obligated to consider the City's objections. Mr. Rosland commented that he had
met with the Bloomington City Manager to discuss the.proposed development and
they had concluded that the Edina Council members should lobby the Bloomington
Council to encourage them to reduce the magnitude of this development. Mayor
Courtney stated he would contact the Bloomington Council members he knew to try
get them to consider reducing the project. Member Turner suggested we also
proceed with initiating.the metropolitan.significance review of the project.
Attorney Erickson stated that the timing of the review may be important in order
to extend any possible delay on construction of the project. Key elements in
such review would be the proposed project's effect on existing or planned land
use or development and the transportation issue. Member Bredesen asked if the
developers are seeking any special tax financing for the project, such as a tax
increment district or revenue bonds. Mr. Larsen indicated he had not heard of
any such proposal. It was informally agreed that the staff would continue to
follow through on the EIS process and that the Council Members would try to
contact members of the Bloomington Council regarding the City's objection to
the size of the proposed development.
v�
4/15/85
PLANS APPROVED FOR EDINAMITE '85 TO BE HELD AT WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland said
that he had received a letter from The Edina Foundation Board of Directors asking
that the Council approve their plans for Edinamite '85, the annual benefit for the
Foundation, to be held on July 13, 1985, at Wooddale School and that they be
authorized to remove and sell items such as bricks, hardware, etc. from.the building
as mementos. The proceeds from the benefit would go to The Edina Foundation, with
a part of the monies allocated to the Edina Historical Society for their projects.
Mr. Rosland pointed out that the date would allow for the building to be vacated
by the August 1, 1985, date set by the Council. Staff members would supervise and
direct the removal of the various items. Member Turner's motion was seconded by
Member Bredesen to approve the Foundation's plans for Edinamite '85 to be held at
Wooddale School on July 13, 1985, and to authorize the removal and sale of any items
from the building as mementos, under the supervision of staff.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION. Mr. Hoff-
man reported that petitions for improvements for Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Water -
main and Graveling in the plat of Indian Hills 2nd Addition had been received, signed
by the developer. Said petition also requested that the entire cost be assessed
against the property of such owners. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated construction
cost.for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -370 at $76,803.01, proposed to be
assessed against 22 connections at a cost of $3,491.05 each; Storm Sewer Improvement
No. P -ST.S -176 at $53,262.76, proposed to be assessed against 15 lots at a cost of
$3,550.85 each; Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -355 at $48,024.58, proposed to be
assessed against 22 connections at $2,182.94 each and Graveling Improvement No. P -C -143
at $16,245.35, proposed to be assessed against 9 lots at $1.805.04 each. As recom-
mended by Mr. Hoffman, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370,
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -176, WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355
AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer, Watermain and Graveling Improve-
ments in Indian Hills 2nd Addition and that the developer now owns all property
which will abut and be assessed for the improvements and that said petition has been
signed by all owners of all abutting property which is owned by the developer.
2. The making of said improvements in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961,
Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designed and shall be referred
to in all subsequent proceedings as:
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -176
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355
GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143
The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against the
properties abutting on said Indian Hills 2nd Addition where said improvements are
to be located.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -33 AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION (WEST 492 STREET).
Mr. Hoffman advised that a 100% petition has been.received for a sidewalk improve -.
ment on West 492 Street adjacent to the Peterson Building, which is located east of
the municipal parking ramp. The building has been. remodeled _to..accomodate.several
small shops and the petition for the sidewalk improvement includes removal of the
loading area formerly used by Peterson Appliance Center, who has now moved out of
the building. Mr. Hoffman presented estimated construction cost for Sidewalk
Improvement No. P -S -33 at $6,340.58, proposed to be. assessed against the owner.at
$5,630.58, with an estimated $710.00 to charged to the 50th and France Maintenance
Assessment. As recommended, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33
BE IT RESOLVED by the City,Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct a Sidewalk Improvement on West 492 Street, and to assess
the entire cost against the property of the petitioners, and that said petition has
been signed by all owners of real property abutting on said street where said
improvement is to be located.
2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of 1961,
I6,
4/15/85
Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be
referred to in all subsequent proceedings as
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33
The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be directed against
the properties abutting on said West 492 Street where said improvement is to be
located, with an estimated $710.00 to be charged to the 50th and France Mainte-
nance Assessment.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
MINNEGASCO LEAKAGE CHECKS /STREET REPAIR DISCUSSED. Member Kelly said she was con-
cerned with the numerous holes being dug in the City's streets by Minnegasco to
check for possible.gas leaks. Mr. Hoffman explained that Minnegasco is embarking
on a project to check for gas leaks in the entire metropolitan area and that
approximately 1,200 house connections will be checked in Edina. Apparently the
coupling used for service to each.home in the period of 1962 -67 is now deteriorating
and must be replaced when leaks are detected:. This results in a 3 x 4 foot hole
being dug in the street and it is the responsibility of Minnegasco to replace the
street surface upon completion of the coupling replacement. Mr. Hoffman pointed
out that Minnegasco has to apply for permits to do this work for which the City
charges a fee. An inspector will be hired for the summer to check each location
to insure that Minnegasco fills the holes they have dug in streets correctly. No
action was taken.
MEMBER KELLY REPORTS ON POLICE RIDE -ALONG EXPERIENCE. Member Kelly reported that
she was very impressed and proud of the expertise shown by the Police Department
during her recent night.patrol.trip with the department, and that it had given
her much insight as to the various things they must deal with.
EXPO 85 SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20 -21. Member Turner reminded the Council Members of
Expo 85 scheduled for April 20 -21, 1985, and thanked them as well as members of the
staff who have commited their time to -this community event.
MLC APPROVAL OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID FORMULA NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised that the
Municipal Legislative Commission is working on a new Local Government Aid Formula,
which is one of six to be presented to the Minnesota Legislature, and that the
Commission will be voting on the proposed formula on Wednesday, April 17. Under
the formula Edina is the only city in the MLC that does not get an increase.
Edina is grandfathered in on Local Government Aid on what we have received in
previous years. Mr. Rosland stated that he felt we could support the proposed
formula for these reasons: 1) they are not putting as much money into the total
pot by raising taxes, and 2) the formula is based on amounts.levied and not on
what cities have expended as in the past. He added that he had advised the MLC's
Operating Committee that the proposed LGA formula would have Edina's support if
it could be tied into the total tax program, one of which is the new formula for
homestead credits based on 1% of market value up to $70,000, or up to a $700.00
exemption which would be a benefit to Edina's property owners. Member Richards
would be voting to support the proposed LGA formula unless the Council objected.
No action was taken.
7TH ANNUAL ALL VOLUNTEERS AWARDS RECOGNITION SET FOR MAY 7, 1985. Mr. Rosland
advised that the 7th Annual All Volunteers Awards Recognition is scheduled for
Tuesday, May 7, at Interlachen Country Club from 5 to 7 p.m. He urged the
Council Members to attend if their schedules permitted.
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that Bob Sherman
is unable to chair the City Hall Space Study Committee, but that he will serve on
the committee. Member Richards will continue to work on.the chairman position so
that the committee can then be activated.
AGREEMENT ON ACQUISITION OF HEDBERG RIGHT OF WAY FOR EDINBOROUGH PROJECT APPROVED.
Planner Gordon Hughes advised that he had reached a tentative agreement with
Hedberg and Sons Company for acquisition of right of way for Parklawn Avenue pro-
posed to be constructed for the Edinborough project. The westerly half of the
right of way is located on property owned by Hedberg and Sons Company and would
need to be acquired prior to proceeding with the project. Mr. Hughes explained
that the amount of right of way to be acquired is 58,900 square feet, and at
$4.00 per square foot would be valued at $235,600. He noted that $4.00 per
square foot was used because that was the price for a recent sale from Hedberg
to Hennepin County for part of the France Avenue project. As part of the construc-
tion of the street, if normal practices were applied for assessment, Hedberg and
Sons Company would be assessed $153,270 for the actual construction of the street.
C a�
4/15/85
The proposed settlement with Hedberg is as follows: 1) Hedberg conveys right of
way at no cost to City, 2) City agrees not to assess Hedberg for improvement, and
3) City agrees to give Hedbergexcess gravel from right of way. Staff believes the
City would acquire the right of way below market value or what we could expect to
receive from condemnation and would recommend approval of the agreement. Member
Turner offered the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager be and they
are hereby authorized to execute an agreement for acquisition of Hedberg right of
way for construction of proposed Parklawn Avenue for the Edinborough project, as
outlined by staff.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
AGREEMENT WITH MNDOT FOR HANSEN-ROAD RAILROAD CROSSING AUTHORIZED. Engineer Hoffman
advised that the Minnesota Department of Transportation ( MNDOT) has sent the cost
participation agreement for installation of a new grade crossing signals and sur-
fact for Hansen Road. During the Hansen Road project of 1985, MNDOT determined
that the crossing was eligible.for construction under the Federal Safety Program.
The estimated total cost is $155,630.00 with a $15,563.00 local...share. Ninety
percent of the funds would be federal and the remaining ten percent would be local
and would be eligible for reimbursement thru State Aid Funds. Staff would there-
fore recommend approval of the agreement. Member Bredesen introduced the following
resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina enter into an Agreement with the Minneapolis,
Northfield and Southern Railway, Inc. and the Commissioner of Transportation for the
installation and maintenance of railroad crossing signals and the crossing surface
at the intersection of Hansen Road with the tracks of Minneapolis, Northfield and
Southern Railway, Inc. in Edina, Minnesota, and appointing the the Commissioner of
Transportation agent for the City to supervise said project and administer available
Federal Funds in accordance with Minnesota Statute, Section 161.36 (1984). The
City's share of the cost shall be ten percent of the.total cost.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager be and they are hereby authorized
to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City.
Motion for.adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RELEASE OF CITY PROPERTY - LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CROCKER & CROWELLS FIRST ADDITION CONTINUED
TO MAY 6, 1985. Mr. Hoffman recalled that at the last meeting the.Council had con-
sidered a request from Jon Otterlei asking that a release be initiated to approve the
return of Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the State so that
the land could be placed of sale. The property was acquired from the State by the
City of Morningside originally for storage of storm .water running off streets in the
area and is no longer required for that purpose. As directed by the Council, a letter
has been sent to the surrounding neighbors to alert..them that the State will probably
put the property up for sale to a private party if the Council releases the lot.
Mr. Hoffman said that after further research it appears that there is.one other option
available to releasing the lot if -it is no longer used for drainage purposes. That
would be for the..City to adopt a.resolution.to retain the lot for open space purposes.
He noted that residents of the area were present who wished to have the City retain
the lot for open space. Gordon Otterlei, 4328 Mackey Avenue, indicated that he was
interested in the release of the lot so that he could acquire it to build a.home for
himself on.the property and that the request for release of the lot had been made on
his behalf by his father, Jon Otterlei. Attorney Erickson explained that the statute
says if the City does not use tax forfeited land for -the original purpose for which
the City requested it be conveyed, that the City then shall give it back to the State
to be put back on the tax rolls. The statute also states that the City can apply for
a change of usage which the State may or may not approve. Speaking in support that
the lot be retained for open space were Annette Scherer, 4234 Lynn Avenue, who also
read a letter in support of open space from James Harris, 4233 Lynn Avenue; Virginia
McWethy, 4231 Oakdale Avenue; Don Giese, 4232 Oakdale Avenue; Linda Maetzold, 4220
Oakdale Avenue and Sandra Mitchell, 4235 Lynn Avenue. Member Bredesen commented that
the City has a strategy for open space which does not necessarily include every
vacant lot, even though neighbors may wish that it remain undeveloped. After further
discussion, Member Bredesen moved that this matter be held over to the May 6, 1985,
Council meeting, so that the neighbors will have an opportunity to think about it
and to discuss it, and so.that the Council can then decide if it fits the City's
open space planning. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
4/15/85
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Hoffman, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -263, P -14, P -15, AND 85 -3
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin
the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT. NOS. BA -263, P -14, P -15, AND 85 -3
CONTRACT 485 -3 (ENG)
BIDS CLOSE MAY 2, 1985
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, May 2, 1985. The Edina
City Council will. meet at 7:00. P.M., Monday May 6, 1985 to consider said
bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
2065 L /F, Concrete Curb and Gutter
1052 Tons, Bituminous Paving
6075 C /Y, Excavation
1380 S /Y, Sod
1200 S/F Sidewalk
3196 Tons, Cl. 2 Gravel
54 Trees, F & I
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon- showing the.. -work
covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of
Edina, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or
submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer,
either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for
receiving them may be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the
office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a
deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of
the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be consider-
ed unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the
City Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid.
The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. All plans
mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for
postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NOS. 1120 =A3 AND 1121 (CABLE TV); PERFORMANCE
AGREEMENT CONCEPT APPROVED. Mr. Rosland advised that Ordinance No.,1120- A3_and:_
No. 1121 have been drafted for adoption by the five cities of the Southwest Sub-
urban Cable Commission, after approximately a year of negotiations with the Rogers
Cablesystems- Southwest regarding.their request for financial relief. The Commission
has recommended to each of its five member cities that the Grantee of their res-
pective cable communications franchise be granted certain financial relief upon
certain conditions. Those conditions are set out in 1) an amendment to the existing
Franchise ordinance, 2) a temporary "Relief Ordinance" and a '.'Performance Agreement ".
Also, the Commission and Grantee are to sign two additional agreements -(A) Local
Programming Facilities and (b) Local Programming Personnel, further implementing
the ordinances and agreement. Mr. Rosland pointed out the major points in each
document as follows: Ordinance Amendment - 1) changes name of Grantee, 2) allows
4'/15%85
extension of Franchise term for 4 years if satisfactory new financing is obtained
by December 31, 1987, 3) allows the City to waive service to extended areas, 4)
allows Grantee to comply with 'liability insurance requirements by use of blanket
policies with annual aggregate limitations, and 5) changes the formula for the
purchase price of the System. Relief Ordinance - 1) temporary ordinance, expiring
not later than March 1, 1992, 2) modifies only specific provisions of the Franchise
and only so long as the Relief Ordinance is in effect, 3) only 60% of the franchise
fee payable in 1984 will be paid and then only in installments, 4) annual franchise
fees payable in 1985 and for the term of the Relief Ordinance also are reduced to
60% of the prior fee, and paid in installments, 5) during the term of the Relief Ordi-
nance the Performance Bond in the amount of $300,000 will be dispensed with, and 6)
during the term of the Relief Ordinance, Grantee need expend only 1% of its gross
revenues for public, governmental and educational access. Mr. Rosland pointed out
that the.key elements for financial relief to the Grantee is 1) reduction of the
franchise fee from 5% to 3% of gross revenues, and 2) that the Grantee need expend
only 1% of its gross revenues for public, governmental and educational access in full
satisfaction of its local programming obligations under the Franchise. The City has
currently approximately $70,000 /80,000 from franchise fees for cable related activi-
ties. The documents provide for a 72 year relief program; should the Grantee reach
certain levels of income then the franchise fee goes back to 5 %. After 72 years it
automatically goes back to 5% unless another relief package is negotiated. It was
noted that the major problem for Rogers Cablesystems is their present bank loan.
The negotiating committee has met with the bank representatives regarding renegotia-
ing the loan and it is hoped that the loan can be renegotiated. Mr. Rosland stated
that the documents have been examined by the cities' attorneys and that approval is
recommended. He pointed out that representatives of Rogers Cablesystems- Southwest
were present as well as Ralph Campbell, Commission Administrator, to answer any
questions. City Attorney Erickson pointed out the importance of the condition under
the Relief Ordinance that during its term the Performance Bond will be dispensed
with until the City requires that it be provided. Mr. Erickson explained that the
exact language of the agreements has not yet been agreed upon by the Grantee and the
cities. However..to expedite the process of adopting the ordinances and authorizing
execution and delivery of the agreements, the following procedure is" recommended:
1) have First Reading of the two ordinances,.and concept approval of the agreements,
and 2) at the Second Reading of the ordinances, the agreements will be available for
review and reaction by the City. If approved, the ordinances can be given final
reading, and execution and delivery of the agreements can be authorized. Member
Turner asked what the impact would be as a result of the reduced franchise fees to
Edina. Mr. Rosland responded that we would receive approximately $25,000/30,000
for the City's cable activities, such as the Edina Police Report program. No other
comment being heard, Member Turner offered Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 for First Reading
as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120 TO
CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE: TO EXTEND THE FRANCHISE
TERM: TO CHANGE THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS: AND TO
CHANGE THE COMPUTATION OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE
PAID BY CITY UPON EXPIRATION OF THE FRANCHISE
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraphs J and S of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
J. "Grantee" is Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited Partnership, a Minn-
esota limited partnership with Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, as the General Partner.
S. "SWSCC" shall mean the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission.
SECTION 2. That Article II, Section 4 of said Ordinance be amended to read
as follows:
This Franchise shall commence upon acceptance by Grantee and shall expire
on December 31, 1995. Provided, however, that if by December 31, 1987, Grantee
(i) is able to close on, and have funded, without conditions, new long term financing,
reasonably satisfactory to City, to replace the obligation evidenced by loan docu-
ments dated April 1, 1982, from Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada,
in the original principal amount of Eighteen Million and No /100 Dollars
($18,000,000.00) (the "Existing Indebtedness "), and (ii) gives written notice of
such new financing to City with written evidence thereof reasonably acceptable to
City, then, upon the occurrence of (i) and (ii) by December 31, 1987, the term of
this Franchise shall be extended by four (4) years, from December 31, 1995 to
December 31, 1999, subject, however, to approval of such extension by the Board, if
required, and the FCC, if required, and any other governmental body having juris-
diction over the matter, if required. If any such approvals are required, City and
Grantee agree to cooperate in obtaining such approvals. If any such approvals are
required, and are not obtained, for any reason, then the four (4) year extension
shall not become effective. If such extension becomes effective, Grantee and City
shall sign and deliver an agreement evidencing such extension, but such extention
shall be effective even without such additional agreement.
/ 3C_-)
4/15/85
SECTION 3. That Article V, Section 2 of said Ordinance be amended by adding
thereto a new Paragraph F as follows:
F. City may waive, at any time and from time to time, for good cause shown,
by Council resolution, compliance by Grantee with any or all of the requirements
imposed on Grantee by this Section 2 relative to providing service to any extended
area or areas.
SECTION 4. That Article VIII, Section 2, Paragraph A, subparagraph (4) of
said Ordinance be amended to read as follows:
(4) Any and all claims which Grantee may now or hereafter have or claim to
have against City, its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents,
employees or officials, due to or arising out of, damage to any of
Grantee's property or equipment, including, without limitation, resulting
- or..consequential loss.of income,.injury to reputation, or any other
resulting or consequential damages of any kind, caused by or resulting
from acts or omissions of City or any of its officers, boards, commissions,
servants, agents, employees or officials.
SECTION 5. That Article VIII, Section 3, Paragraph A of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
A. Grantee shall maintain liability insurance covering its obligations of
indemnification provided for in, or as a result of the exercise of, this Franchise
(except, however, for the indemnifications in subparagraph (3) of Article VIII,
Section 2, Paragraph A of this Franchise) covering both the City and Grantee and
shall maintain said insurance during the term of this Franchise in the minimum of:
1. $500,000.00 for property damage to any one person;
2. $2,000,000.00 for property damage in any one act or occurence;
3. $1,000,000.00 for personal injury to any one person; and
4. $2,000,000.00 for personal injury in any one act or occurence.
The foregoing insurance may be provided by means of a blanket liability insur-
ancy policy or policies with an annual aggregate limitation of not less than
$262000,000.00.
SECTION 6. That Article VIII, Section 3, Paragraph E of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
E. All insurance policies maintained pursuant to this Franchise shall contain
the following endorsements and provisions:
(i) It is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not
be cancelled nor the intention not to renew be stated until 60 days
after receipt to City, by registered mail, of written notice of such
intention to cancel or not to renew.
(ii) A waiver of subrogation, in form and substance acceptable to City, as
to any and all claims against the City which are waived hereunder by
Grantee or as to which Grantee has agreed hereunder to indemnify and
hold harmless the City and its officers, boards, commissioners, servants,
officials, agents and employees.
(iii) A provision that if the aggregate insurance coverage of the blanket
policies provided by Grantee is'ever reduced below $10,000,000.00,
then notice of such fact shall promptly be given to City by Grantee or
Grantee's insurance agent and additional liability coverage shall
immediately be purchased by Grantee so as to restore the annual aggregate
to the minimum amount then required under this Franchise.
SECTION 7. That Article XI, Section 2, Paragraph C of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
C. The purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon revocation or
termination of the Franchise shall be the cost less depreciation (as shown on the
books and records of Grantee) or the fair market value, whichever is less, and
goodwill shall not be included in the purchase price of the System. However, if
this Franchise expires (and is not revoked or terminated) and if Grantee had
complied with the requirements of Article II, Section 4 of this Franchise, and all
required approvals are obtained, so that the Franchise term is extended for an
additional four (4) years pursuant to said Section 4, then the purchase price of
the System to be paid by City upon expiration of this Franchise shall be the fair _..
market value of the System determined on the basis of the System valued as a going
concern but with no value given or allocated to this Franchise itself. If the
City and Grantee cannot agree on the purchase price, it shall be determined by
arbitration pursuant to the provisons of this Section 2.
SECTION 8. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with the provisions
of Article XIV of said Ordinance, including delivery to the City of the acceptance,
opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said
Article XIV.
SECTION 9. Subject to the provisions of Section 8 hereof, this Ordinance
shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication.
Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
4/15/85
Member Turner introduced Ordinance No. 1121 for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1121
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE,
PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF
THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This ordinance shall be known as the "CATV Relief Ordinance."
SECTION 2. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.
The City has granted a cable television franchise through the adoption of city
ordinance code sections No. 1120 , the Cable Communications Ordinance (hereinafter
called the ( "Franchise "). The cities of Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and
Richfield (the "Other Cities ") have adopted similar ordinances, all with the same
franchise Grantee. Through the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC "), a
joint powers organization, the City and the Other Cities have undertaken to super-
vise Grantee's compliance with these ordinances.
Since the adoption of the Franchise Grantee has constructed and is operating a
cable communications system in City and the Other Cities. Grantee has approached
the City indicating that it is experiencing serious financial difficulties and would
be unable to pay the franchise fee due and payable on November 1, 1984. Grantee
requested a temporary reduction of its Franchise obligations to allow for its finan-
cial recovery.
City authorized the SWSCC to review Grantee's request and make recommendations for
an appropriate response. SWSCC retained a financial consultant to assist in
analyzing Grantee's financial condition, held several public meetings, and conducted
a thorough review of Grantee's request. SWSCC determined that Grantee is exper-
iencing serious financial difficulties caused by such adverse factors as higher
than anticipated construction and operating costs, lower than projected market
penetration, inability to obtain long -term financing at projected rates and other
industry, economic and technological changes. SWSCC also concluded that Grantee
cannot secure needed refinancing of its long -term debt, cannot continue to provide
the present level of service and cannot become an economically viable enterprise
unless the City grants a period of relief from some of the requirements of the
Franchise.
SWSCC recommends that the City grant temporary amendments to the Franchise, reducing
the franchise fee payable now and in the future, eliminating the required performance
bond, and modifying the provisions for local programming. In return, Grantee
would execute a Performance Agreement providing a means for monitoring Grantee's
financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing
for certain other matters related to Grantee's requested relief.
The City has reviewed SWSCC's recommendations and has considered the option of
requiring full payment of the past due franchise fee through use of Grantee's letter
of credit, performance bond, and parent company performance guarantees. Grantee
represents, however, that if the City and the Other Cities -seek payment of past due
franchise fees through resort to such securities, this would only make it more
difficult for Grantee to solve its financial problems and would be counterproduct-
ive to any effort to provide relief to Grantee.
In adopting this ordinance the City relies upon the representations of Grantee and
seeks to provide a means by which the public can continue to receive approximately
the same level of service while affording Grantee a reasonable opportunity for
financial recovery. The ultimate purpose of this ordinance is to secure, at a later
time during the Franchise term, the full public benefits provided for in the Franchise.
SECTION 3. RELATIONSHIP TO CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE.
This ordinance does not permanently amend any provision of the Cable Communi-
cations Ordinance-(the "Franchise ") but provides that certain provisions of that
ordinance are modified for a period of time as provided in this Relief Ordinance.
Except as expressly modified in this ordinance, the provisions of the Franchise
remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 4. DEFINITIONS.
Subdivision 1. The definitions in the Franchise also apply to this ordinance.
Subd. 2. In addition, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings
given them:
(1) "Existing indebtedness" means an $18,000,000 loan made to Grantee by
Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada under loan documents dated April 1, 1982.
(2) "Franchise" means the Cable Communications Ordinance as now or hereafter
amended.
(3) "Local Programming Obligations" means, for the purpose of this ordinance,
Grantee's obligations under the Franchise and the offering for cablecast access,
community access and local origination programming.
(4) "Performance Agreement" means a contractual agreement between Grantee,
City and SWSCC providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition,
assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other
t�
4/15/85
matters related to Grantee's requested relief.
SECTION 5. RELIEF GRANTED.
While this ordinance is in effect the obligations of Grantee are modified
to the extent provided in this section.
Subdivision 1. Franchise Fees - Percentage.
Commencing with Grantee's fiscal year 1985 the annual franchise fee is reduced
from 5% of Gross Revenues to 3 %. Such annual fees shall be paid to City in
equal quarterly payments on or before the first day of each of the months of
November, February, May and August next following the end of Grantee's fiscal
year.
If this ordinance terminates during any of Grantee's fiscal years, the franchise
fee shall be restored to the rate of 5% of Gross Revenues at the end of the
calendar month in which termination occurs. The restored rate of 5% and the
reduced rate of 3% shall be applied respectively to the Gross Revenues collected
only in the months during which each rate was in effect. The fees accruing at
the restored rate shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the Franchise.
The fees accruing at the reduced rate shall be paid in equal quarterly install-
ments in accordance with the terms of this ordinance.
Subd. 2. Past Due Franchise Fees. The 1984 franchise fee in the amount
of $ payable on or before November 1, 1984 shall be deemed fully dis-
charged and paid if, but only if, Grantee pays the sum of (60 %) to the
City, in four equal payments on or before June 1, June 15, August 15 and
October 15, 1985.
Subd. 3. Letters of Credit. The City Council may by resolution reduce
the required amount of the Letter of Credit below $50,000 if in its sole dis-
cretion it determines that a lesser amount is reasonable and adequate to protect
the public. It may thereafter, by resolution, require the amount of the Letter
of Credit to be increased or fully restored to the amount of $50,000. Grantee
shall comply with this.requirement within sixty days after written notice has
been given by the City.
Subd. 4. Performance Bond. The Grantee may dispense with the $300,000
performance bond required by the Franchise. The City Council may thereafter
by resolution require that such bond, or similar bond in a lesser amount, be
provided by Grantee. Grantee shall comply with this requirement within sixty
days after written notice has been given by the City.
Subd. 5. Local Programming Obligations. Grantee shall expend at least 1%
of its annual Gross Revenues each fiscal year in fulfilling its Local Program-
ming Obligations under the Franchise for public, governmental, and educational
access, but it shall not be obligated to expend more than that amount for such
access. That amount shall not include any costs of operation or administration
not directly related to the provision of local programming. This expenditure
shall be in complete satisfaction of Grantee's total Local Programming Obliga-
tions during the period of this ordinance.
SECTION 6. AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELIEF ORDINANCE PROVISIONS.
The provisions of this ordinance, and the relief herein granted, shall cease
to be effective, automatically, upon the occurrence of the earliest of-any of
the following events:
Subdivision 1. Failure of the Grantee to complete refinancing its Existing
Indebtedness by December 31, 1987 in accordance with Article II, Section 4 of
the Franchise.
Subd. 2. The end of the next month after Grantee has collected cumulative
Gross Revenues in the amount of one hundred million dollars as measured from
September 1, 1984. The determination of cumulative Gross Revenues shall be
based upon audited financial statements for periods for which they are available
and upon Grantee's operating reports for periods for which audited statements
are not then available. Grantee shall provide City with its financial state-
ments and financial operating reports promptly after they are prepared.
Subd. 3. March 1, .1992.
Subd. 4. Payment,.discharge, or satisfaction of the Existing Indebtedness,
except through refinancing as provided in Article II., Section 4 of the Franchise.
Subd. 5. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the indebtedness arising
from the refinancing provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.
Subd. 6. Failure of the Grantee to restore or replace the full required
amount of the Letter of Credit as provided in Article VIII, Section 4,
paragraph H of the Franchise.
Subd. 7. Failure of the Grantee to pay the fees as required in Section 5,
Subd. 2 of this ordinance.
Subd. 8. Failure.of the Grantee to restore, replace or increase either a
Letter of Credit or bond within sixty days of written notice by the City, as
provided in Section 5, Subdivisions 3 and 4 of this ordinance.
Subd. 9. A holding or determination by any court or agency that any term,
condition or provision of this Relief Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable,
as a result of any action taken by Grantee or anyone acting on Grantee's behalf
seeking such determination.
10'Z1
4/15/85
Subd. 10. Sale or transfer of all or substantially all of the System to a
person or entity other than a parent, subsidiary, related corporation, affiliated
corporation, partner or joint venturer of Grantee or any parent of Grantee.
Subd. 11. Termination of `the Franchise.
SECTION 7. OTHER TERMINATIONS.
This ordinance may also be terminated for cause, under the same procedures for
termination as are contained in the Franchise, for the following reasons;
Subdivision 1. All grounds for termination provided in the Franchise, except
to the extent that Grantee's performance obligations are modified in this
ordinance.
Subd. 2. The purchase by Grantee, its general partner, or any parent, subsid-
iary, affiliate or other related corporation of Grantee or its general partner, of
a cable communications system or any part thereof or interest therein, located
within the seven - county metropolitan area as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 473.121, Subd. 2. For this purpose the definition of a cable communications
system shall be as that term is currently defined by the Board.
Such a purchase shall not be grounds for termination of this ordinance, however,
if the - Grantee demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the
purchase (1) will not impair the operating cash flow or financial position of
Grantee and (2) will involve independent financing of the purchase without resort
to the assets of the System.
Subd. 3. Failure of the Grantee to comply with any of the provisions of the
Performance Agreement.
SECTION 8. REQUESTS FOR FURTHER RELIEF.
No request by the Grantee for any further relief from the requirements of the
Franchise, including a request for an extension of the term of this ordinance,
shall be considered by the City unless that request is made in writing prior to
September 1, 1990. The City shall have no obligation whatsoever to consider or
grant any such request, and any response to such request shall be at the sole
discretion of the City.
SECTION 9. ACCEPTANCE OF THIS RELIEF ORDINANCE; PROVIDING OF GUARANTEES.
This ordinance shall be accepted by Grantee in accordance with the provisons
of Article XIV of the Franchise. This ordinance shall not become effective until
Grantee has executed and delivered to the City the written Performance Agreement
and attached contractual documents.
Motion for First Reading of Ordinance No. 1121.was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Turner then moved concept approval of the Performance Agreement to be signed
by the City and Grantee and the agreements for Local Programming Facilities and
Local Programming Personnel to be signed by the Commission and Grantee. Motion was
seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20 (FEES FOR-ON-SALE LIQUOR AND ON -SALE WINE LICENSE) ADOPTED
ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland recalled that the Council had given First Reading
to Ordinance No. 171 -A20 at the meeting of April 1, 1985. The ordinance increases
the fee for On -Sale Liquor License and establishes the fee for On -Sale Wine
License in accordance with the wine license ordinance. Attorney Erickson called
attention to minor changes regarding the fees as they relate to number of seats in
restaurants and pointed out that the fee of $50.00 per year for Manager's License
should be included in the ordinance. There being no further comment, Member Kelly
introduced the revised Ordinance No. 171 -A20 for Second Reading and moved its
adoption as follows: -
- ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
AND TO ESTABLISH FEE FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number of Schedule A
to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
902 10 Intoxicating liquor $1,400.00 per year 36b
on -sale license
Sec. 2. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by adding the
following thereto:
1-3y
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE
902 38(b) On -sale wine license
4/15/85
FEE NO.
Per year, restaurants with 36g
50 seats or fewer $550.00
51 - 100 seats, inclusive 600.00
101 - 150 seats, inclusive 650.00
Over 150 seats 700.00
902 42(e) Manager's license $50.00 per year I 36h
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
PRELININARY APPROVAL GRANTED FOR $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS. The
Mayor stated that this was the time and place fixed by this Council for a public
hearing on the proposal that the City undertake and finance a project (the Project)
on behalf of Fairview Community Hospitals, a Minnesota non - profit corporation
(Fairview) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474. The City Clerk.presented
affidavits showing publication of the notice of public hearing at least once not
less than 15 nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing,
in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, and in the Minneapolis
Star and Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation throughout the City. The
affidavits were examined, found to be satisfactory and ordered placed.on file with
the City Clerk.
The Mayor then opened the meeting for the public hearing on the proposal to under-
take and finance the Project on behalf of Fairview. The purpose of the hearing
was explained, the nature of the Project and of the proposed revenue bonds was
discussed, the draft copy of the Application to the Minnesota Department of Energy
and Economic Development with draft copies of all attachments and exhibits were
available, and all persons present who desired to do so were afforded an opportunity
to express their view with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the
Project, in response to which the following persons either appeared, were recognized
and made statements, or filed written comments with the City Clerk before the date
set for the hearing, summaries of which appear opposite their respective names:
Name of Speaker Summary of Views
None N/A
After all persons who wished to do so had stated or filed their views on the
proposal, the Mayor declared the public hearing to be closed. After some dis-
cussion, Member Bredesen moved for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT AND
ITS FINANCING UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
ACT (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS PROJECT); REFERRING THE
PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL;
AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the Municipality),
as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality finance a portion
or all of the cost of a proposed project under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474
(the Act), consisting of the remodeling of certain areas of Fairview - Southdale
Hospital (the Hospital) located within the Municipality at 6401 France Avenue
South and the acquisition and installation of items of equipment in the Hospital
by Fairview Community Hospitals, a Minnesota non - profit corporation (Fairview)
and the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness of Fairview incurred in the
acquisition or betterment of the Hospital (the Project).
1.2. At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on April 15, 1985, in accordance
with the Act on the proposal to undertake and finance the Project, all parties
who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with
respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the Project and interested
persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk
before the time of the hearing. Based on the public hearing, such written comments
(if any) and such other.facts and circumstances as this Council deems relevant,
this Council hereby finds, determines and declares as follows:
(a) The welfare of the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attract-
ion, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce
through governmental acts to prevent, so far as possible, emergence of blighted
lands and areas of chronic unemployment, and the State of Minnesota has encouraged
local government units to act to prevent such economic deterioration.
(b) Other factors necessitating such active promotion and development of
4/1$/85
industry and commerce within the Municipality are the need to provide quality
medical care to residents of the Municipality and surrounding areas and the need
for more intensive development and use of land within the Municipality.
(c) The Project would further the general purposes contemplated and described
in Section 474.01 of the Act.
(d) This Council has been advised by representatives of Fairview, that
conventional, commercial financing to pay the cost of the Project is available
only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the economic
feasibility of undertaking the Project would be significantly reduced and would
result in higher patient and third party payor charges, but that with the aid of
municipal borrowing, and its resulting lower borrowing cost, will materially
increase the economic feasibility of the Project, will reduce patient charges and
third party payor costs, and will constitute a significant inducement to Fairview
to undertake the Project.
(e) This Council has also been advised by representatives of Fairview that on
the basis of their discussions with potential buyers of tax - exempt bonds, revenue
bonds of the Municipality (which may be in the form of a commercial development
revenue note or notes) could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to
finance the Project.
(f) The Municipality is authorized by the Act to issue its revenue bonds to
finance capital projects consisting of properties used and useful in connection
with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in
providing health care services, including without limitation, hospitals, nursing
homes and related medical facilities, such as Fairview, and the issuance of the bonds
by the Municipality would be a substantial inducement to Fairview to undertake the
Project.
SECTION 2
Determination to Proceed with
the Project and its Financing
2.1. On the basis of the information given the Municipality to date, it appears
that it would be desirable for the Municipality to issue its revenue bonds under
the provisions of the Act to finance the Project in the maximum aggregate face
amount of $12,000,000.
2.2. It is hereby determined to proceed with the Project and its financing and
this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the Municipality issue its
revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal
obligation on the part of the Municipality or its City Council to issue or to cause
the issuance of such revenue bonds, and issuance of such revenue bonds shall be sub -
ject to final approval by the City Council of the Municipality. All details of such
revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to final
approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Develop -
ment, shall be subject to such further conditions as the Municipality may specify
and shall be subject to final approval of the issuance of such revenue bonds by the
City Council of the Municipality. The revenue bonds, if issued, shall not constitute
a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the Munici-
pality, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each
bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including
interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically
pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the Municipality
within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation.
2.3. The Application to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Develop-
ment, with attachments, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are
authorized to execute said documents on behalf of the Municipality.
2.4. In accordance with Section 474.10, Subdivision 7a of the Act, the Mayor and
City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be sub-
mitted to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development for approval
of the Project. The Mayor, City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, employees
and agents of the Municipality are hereby authorized and directed to provide the
Department with any preliminary information needed for this purpose. The City
Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents
as may be appropriate to the Project, if approved by the Department and if issuance
of such revenue bonds is given final approval by this City Council.
SECTION 3
General
3.1. If the bonds are issued and sold, the'Municipality will enter into a lease,
sale or loan agreement or similar agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act
(the Revenue Agreement) with Fairview. The lease rentals, installment sale payments,
loan payments or other amounts payable by Fairview to the Municipality under the
Revenue Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest and
redemption premium, if any, on, the bonds as and when the same shall become due and
payable.
3.2. Fairview has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and
indirect costs incurred by the Municipality in connection with the Project, whether
or not the Project is carried to completion, and whether or not approved by the
/3fln
I
4/15/85
Minnesota Department of Energy and Economic Development, and whether or not
the Municipality by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be
paid by.Fairview upon request.
3.3. The Mayor and City Manager are directed, if the bonds are issued and
sold, thereafter to comply with the provisions of Section 474.01, Subdivisions 8
and 11 of the Act.
Adopted this 15th day of April, 1985.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Kelly and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same: None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by
the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded.by Member Kelly for.payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 4/15/85: General Fund $98,679.48,
Art Center $1,603.03, Swimming Pool Fund $9,900.00, Golf Course. Fund $8,481.31,
Recreation Center Fund $3,235.68, Gun Range Fund $656.59, Water Fund $4,558.06,
Utility Fund $12,407.65, Liquor Dispensary Fund $69,120.41, Construction Fund
$720.00, Total $209,362.21; and for confirmation of the following claims
dated 3/31/85: General Fund $149,179.89, Park Fund $4,854.85, Art Center $366.10,
Golf Course Fund $2,373.96, Recreation Center Fund $5,773.99, Gun Range Fund
$4.50, Utility Fund $7,536.57, Liquor Dispensary Fund $247,684.90, Total
$417,774.76.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 10:23 p.m.
5
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 1, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
EDINA MIDGET WHITE A HOCKEY TEAM COMMENDED. Mayor Courtney read the following reso-
lution of commendation for the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team, which was adopted
unanimously:
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION - EDINA MIDGET WHITE A HOCKEY TEAM
WHEREAS, Edina's long - standing superiority in youth hockey was again asserted with
the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team capturing the r1AHA State 1,Iidget Hockey
Championship; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets completed a successful season with a record of 34 wins,
4 losses and 4 ties; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets was the runner -up team in the International Silver Stick
Tournament at Sarnia, Ontario, being the first time an American team went to the
finals; and
WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their extraordinary
ability, hours of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and
WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the team exemplified
the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, on behalf
of the citizenry as a whole, that the Edina Midget White A Hockey Team be publicly
commended for their outstanding accomplishments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the Minutes
Book of the'City Council and that copies be presented to the members of the team:
Sean Collins, Matt Crowley, Kirk Dulac, Doug Evenson, Mark Feese, Jim Genung, Ted
Hoffman, Erik Johnson, Sean Kearney, Pat McCarthy, John McCoy, Rob .Morris, Doug
Mostrom, Peter Perry, Dan Peterson, Jim Turner and Todd Willson, to Coaches Hal
Tearse and John Turner and to Team Managers. Jack Genung and Jerry Kearney.
ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1985.
Copies of the resolution were then presented personally to the team captains and
each member of the team who was present and to the coaches. Member Turner commented
that this was an exceptional fine group of young men who are a credit to Edina on .
and off the ice and that they and their parents join in thanking the Edina Hockey
Association and Mr. Kojetin and his staff in making these programs possible.
MARK BERNHARDSON COMMENDED FOR OUTSTANDING JOB AS ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland
advised that Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager, has tendered his resignation
and has accepted the position of City Administrator in Orono, Minnesota. He recalled
that Mr. Bernhardson came to the City in July of 1977 and has been his assistant
since he was appointed as City Manager in October of that year. Mr. Rosland stated
that Mr. Bernhardson has been a very helpful and strong Assistant Manager, and that
although the.City staff was sorry to see him,go,.that we are proud of his accomplish-
ments and thank him for his dedicated service to the City. Mr. Rosland presented
him with a silver pen bearing the City logo and wished him well in his new position.
On behalf of the Council, Mayor Courtney expressed their regrets in his leaving and
also extended their wishes for success in the future.
MINUTES of the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18, 1985,
were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRD -3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES PROPERTY GRANTED
FIRST READING (ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A3). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting
Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen, Planner, recalled
that the public hearing.on_ the Zoning - Change from_R- 1 .to -PRD -3 for -the Brutger
Companies property, generally located west.of..Cahill Road and..south.of..Dewey Hill
Road, had been continued.from the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985. The request
for rezoning had been heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission
on January 2 and January 30, 1985. The site is abutted by Dewey Hill Condominiums
on the north and west and by Windwood Condominiums directly to the south. Mr. Larsen
stated that according to the City's Comprehensive Plan of 1980 the site is desig-
nated as suitable for medium density residential and this is in the range of 6 to
12 dwelling units per acre. The proponent, Brutger Companies, is requesting a
rezoning from the existing R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Resi-
dential District and have submitted a site plan illustrating.26_townhouse units and
24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven individual buildings.
Each individual building would contain either 4, 6 or 8 units. This would result
in an overall density for the site of 9.73 dwelling units per acre on the 5.14 acre
I 0 -0
4/1/85
site. The plan proposes to mix traditional townhouse style of units (living space
-for one family on two different floors) with a condominium style unit where all
the living space will be on one floor. Individual units, whether townhouse or
condominium, will contain between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet of living area. The
townhouse units will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit and the condo -
minium units will provide parking at a ratio of 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit. All
garages proposed by the site plan are attached. In addition to the surface parking
spaces that would be provided in front of each garage stall, there are 24 surface
parking spaces scattered thoughout the site. All buildings are 2 -story in design
and the exterior treatment would be brick and cedar siding with asphalt shingles.
Mr. Larsen advised that the staff report of January 30 recommended approval of the
project. However, by a 6 to 3 vote the Planning Commission recommended denial of
the proposed plan. He noted that Steve Wilson of the Brutger Companies was present
.to explain the proposed project further. Mr. Wilson stated that the Brutger Com-
panies is a development corporation specializing in multi - family housing. He then
outlined some of the steps they had taken in the selection of this type of project
as.the best and highest use for the subject property. He pointed out that the
City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Housing Element, identifies a second theme as
the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choicer
available in the City and to offer...a.wide range of market rate residential housing
choices. Mr. Wilson stated that they had worked closely with City staff to meet
the goal under the Plan's Land Use Element of encouraging excellence in site plan-
ing, building materials and design. The Plan also states that vacant.lands.in the
Cahill and 70th Street area are generally characterized by severe environmental
limitations such as slopes or poor soils and multiple residential or clustered
housing presents the most logical means of land utilization. Mr. Wilson pointed
out that the proposed project uses the cluster housing concept to utilize the
existing topography. They also-looked-at-the City's 1980 Land Use Plan which shows
two primary areas within the City that have a medium density land use designation.
Within those areas they had found a mixture of apartments, townhouses and condo -
miums projects which had been constructed and had selected the clustered housing
concept which has been well received in the housing market. Mr. Wilson added that
they had considered the requirements established by the Zoning Ordinance as to
density and setbacks and that the proposed project is well within those guidelines.
In summary he stated that the project will be highly marketable, that it is a
quality product and will have amenities that are appealing to the people who are
going to buy the units. Tom Hunt, Carlson..Mjorud Architecture, architect for the
project, then outlined the architectural elements of the project: 1) exterior to
be of brick and cedar, compatible ..with the.surrounding area, 2) buildings would be
sited to create a park -like setting, 3) the footprint of the buildings would pro-
vide interest by use of jogs, 4) the buildings would have an animated roofscape,
and 5) landscaping would include flowering trees /shrubs to add color and interest,
with the vegetation to interface with surrounding property. Mr. Wilson then
responded to general questions from the audience. He clarified that the units
will be owner occupied, not rental, and will be designed for several types of
marketing; that the one - level, first floor -units will be.geared - primarily for the
elderly,...the_ one- level,.second floor.units..would: appeal to.the young professionals,
and the 2 -story townhouse units would appeal to the young professional couples but
will not necessarily be geared to families; and that the questions of pets would
be a decision to be made by the association which will be formed. He added that
the setbacks requirements are 20 foot sideyard.,.35 foot rear yard and 35 foot front
yard. Buildings will be sited at angles to eliminate a tunnel look. City ordi-
nance requires that garbage cans.must be-in an-enclosure or building and will not
be seen from surrounding properties. The units are proposed to be priced from a
minimum of $95,000/100,000 to a maximum of $135,000/140,000. Bob Gunderson,
6550 York Avenue, addressed some of the issues that were raised at the Planning
Commission meeting with regard to density, integrity of neighborhood, quality of
structure, design and landscaping. In summary,-he stated that the site has unique
possibilities and that the proposed development was designed for this particular
site to meet the demand and needs of people who are looking to shift residences or
move into Edina; that'the proposed project responds to the Comprehensive Plan,
meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements and follows the precedent established by
other approved developments in Edina. Mr. Wilson then responded to general ques-
tions of the Council regarding comparision of price range of the proposed units
with adjacent.properties, exterior materials, windows, and lot coverage. Melvin
Gittleman stated he was the developer of Dewey Hill Condomiums, East and West and
of the proposed South building. He stated that he objected to the proposed develop-
ment for these reasons: 1) the development will be out of scale to the surround-
ing area because the site has existing three -story buildings on three sides,
2) the density is too high, 3) lot coverage not compatible with adjacent develop-
ments. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Homeowners Association, advised that
30% of the members of the Association are opposed to the proposed development and
that at its February meeting Windwood's.Board of Directors had voted unanimously
1
0\
4/1/.85
to go on record in opposition. He summarized the concerns of the Windwood resi-
dents as follows: 1) the ratio of "covered" land to green area is too high,
2) increased traffic in the area, 3) detrimental effect to Windwood residents by
addition.of a two -story structure so close to the property line, 4) development
would not be in keeping with "flavor" of neighborhood, and 5) concern for wildlife
of the area. Also speaking in opposition to the proposed development were
Alvyn Pope, 5601 Dewey Hill Road 4210- Harley Peet, 5501 Dewey Hill Road #324;
William Harrison, 7510 Cahill Road, and Albert Levin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. No
further comment being heard, Member Turner moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A3
as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) final zoning is conditioned on
final plat, 2) developer's agreement, 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) approval
of landscaping plan. Member Turner stated she supported the rezoning because it
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan both in terms of widening the range of
housing choices and the medium density land use designation and that it meets
the requirements of PRD -3 zoning. She pointed out two concerns that should be
addressed before Second Reading: 1) landscaping to protect surrounding properties
and 2) concern for increased traffic. Motion for granting First Reading was
seconded by Member Kelly. Member Richards stated he would support the motion if
the proposed development were reduced in density not to exceed 44 units total for
the site. Member Bredesen commented that he would support an effort to reduce
the density to-44 units but that his biggest concern was that a landscaping plan
should be submitted that would show mature plantings and a heavily landscaped site.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
First Reading granted.
ORDINANCE NO. 82-5-A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
. Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -3) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet of the North 30 acres of the
NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
PSR -4 PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING FOR WOODHAVEN GRANTED FIRST READ-
ING (ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk,
approved and ordered placed on file. Gordon Hughes, City Planner, presented the
request for zoning change from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned
Senior Residence District for Woodhaven, generally located south of Interlachen
Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue and north of Vernon Avenue. The subject property
measures 32,500 square feet in area and is composed of three developed single
family lots. He recalled that Council had approved a rezoning to PRD -3 District
for this property on March 19, 1984, for continuation of a townhouse project that
had started at the corner of Summit Avenue and Interlachen Blvd. Five of the units
were constructed and a rezoning was approved for 8 more units to be constructed on
the subject property. This project did not receive a final plat approval although
it was rezoned and construction has not and apparently will not commence. Mr. Hughes
stated that the property has now been optioned by Westminster Corporation for the
purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster, who operates under
the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis /St. Paul, is working with a
group of Edina churches who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. It will
be funded by the HUD 202 Program and the project will be identical to South Haven
which was recently constructed at Parklawn and York Avenues. If the project receives
preliminary approval, an application will be submitted to HUD to finance the project.
Final approval would not be sought until a financing commitment is achieved. The
request is for construction of a three -story building with 28 senior citizen units
and one caretaker unit. As with the previous townhouse plan, it is proposed that
Summit Avenue be vacated and the right of way be included within the site. In
conformance with the traffic plan that was submitted by BRW for the Grandview area,
access to the site will be maintained both to Interlachen Boulevard as well as
Vernon Avenue to alleviate the site distance problems associated with the Summit
and Interlachen intersection. Mr. Hughes pointed out that from the Zoning Ordinance
standpoint, the project generally complies but the following deficiencies should be
noted: Required Proposed
.Lot Area for 29 dwelling units 33,750 sq.ft. 32,500
Enclosed parking 8 spaces 7 spaces
Exposed parking 15 spaces 14 spaces
Parking setbacks 10 feet 5 feet
/oa
4/1/85
Building height was a concern expressed by property owners to the west in regard to
the prior townhouse plan. The proposed building is a full three stores in height
rather than two and one -half stories as were the townhouses. Although a final grading
plan..has not been submitted, the first floor elevation of the proposed building will
be lower than the townhouses that were proposed. As a result, it appears that the
overall height.of the proposed building is within..2 -3 feet of the townhouses that
were approved for the site. The rezoning request was heard by the Community Develop-
ment and Planning Commission at its February 27, 1985 meeting. The Commission
recommended preliminary rezoning approval, subject to the following: 1) vacation of
Summit Avenue, 2) acceptable overall development plans, 3) final platting, 4) sub -
division dedication, 5) developer's agreement, and 6) redevelopment contract with
the Edina HRA. Mr. Hughes indicated that Larry Laukka, coordinator for the Edina
Ministerial Association in connection with the project, was present. Mr. Laukka
introduced John Rocheford, Community.Development Corporation, as the developer for
the project; Jan Blessner, Trossen /Wright Architects, as the architect; and Jim
Curry, lay committee member. Mr. Laukka indicated that the Edina churches involved
in the project will raise approximately $75,000 towards the funding. Mr. Curry
advised that Community Development Corporation operate 1,600 units in 25 non - profit
corporations and have a lot of experience with projects of this type. He noted
that there were few sites left in Edina for elderly housing and that the Ministerial
Association was excited for such an opportunity, explaining that the price was right
in addition to the location. Mr. Rocheford explained that Westminster Corporation
is the management subsidiary of Community Development Corporation. He advised that
he has met with the neighbors regarding their concerns: 1) landscaping, and 2) the
height of the building. He stated that if funding is approved through the HUD 202
Program the issue of landscaping will be addressed in more detail and plans will
be brought before the Council. Regarding building height, he pointed out that the
roof line of the proposed building will be two feet higher than what the townhouses
proposed for roof line which in addition proposed several fireplaces above the roof
line. Member Richards said he was concerned about the density and building coverage
for the site. Mr. Rocheford and Mr. Curry explained that the requirements for funding
through the HUD 202 Program are very restrictive. Units cannot-be larger than
540 sq..ft.. and. all units must be one bedroom except for the caretaker unit. The
occupant elegibility is a combination of asset /income not to exceed $11,500 per year,
and occupants receive subsidized rent. Experience with projects of this type has
shown that less than one -third of the residents actually own a car. HUD also
requires that the project must be close to shopping and service centers and the
subject property is unique in that it meets those stringent requirements. Mr. Laukka
commented that the proposed site would function with 32 units but that the project
was scaled down to a total of 29 units, that they had looked at the land use issue
and were of the opinion that this site would not be thwarted because of 29 units,
nor would it set a precedent for future developments. Member Turner asked if a
sidewalk would be provided down to Vernon Avenue and noted that there were no side-
walks on Vernon. Ms. Blessner responded that the plans showed a sidewalk all the
way from the front door, with no steps. Engineer Hoffman stated that when changes
are made as recommended in the Grandview traffic study that sidewalks could be
constructed at that time and that 3 traffic signals are proposed for that area.
Mr. Hoffman clarified that access to the building will be maintained both to Inter-
lachen Boulevard and to Vernon Avenue, with one restriction that no left turn will
be allowed onto Interlachen Boulevard because of the sight distance. There being
no further comments, Member Kelly introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A6 for First Reading,
subject to the following conditions: 1) vacation of Summit Avenue, 2) acceptable
overall development plans, 3) final platting, 4) subdivision dedication, 5) deve-
loper's agreement, and 6) redevelopment contract with the Edina HRA:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A6
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PSR -4)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Senior Residence District (Sub- District PSR -4) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
"Lot 3, Block 5, Grandview Heights; Lot 4, Block 4, Grandview Heights;
Lot 5, Block 4, Grandview Heights and adjacent street right of way."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for granting First Reading was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR INTERLACHEN HEIGHTS. Affidavits of Notice were pre-
sented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented
the request for preliminary plat approval for Interlachen Heights, generally located
\ -wn
4,/1/85 .
west of Ridge Road and north and south of Interlachen Boulevard. The subject
property measures 12.75 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit
District. An existing dwelling is located in the north central portion of the
site. The request that was hedid by the Community Development and Planning
Commission on February 27, 1985, proposed 20 R -1 lots with Lot 7 of the proposed
plat being retained for the existing home. The proposed lots range from 17,500
square feet to 34,900 square feet with an average of 23,000 square feet. The plat
proposes the westerly extension of Interlachen Boulevard to a temporary cul -de -sac
and the northerly extension to Interlachen of Green Farms. Road as was proposed
in the preliminary plat of Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition which was approved several
years ago. The area north of Interlachen Boulevard is proposed to be served by
two cul -de -sacs rather than a through street due to dimensional problems as well
as undesirable effects on the existing home. Both Interlachen and Green Farms
are proposed to terminate with temporary cul -de -sacs pending development of pro-
perties to the south and west. After the Planning Commission meeting, the owner
submitted a slightly revised plat in response to a criticism of the staff that
the side lot lines of Lot 3, Block 2 and Lot 2, Block 1, should be oriented more
radially with the curve of Green Farms Road to provide more logical lot shapes.
The revised plat provided for the realignment.of those side lot lines and the
owner also found it feasible to add one more lot increasing the number of lots in
the plat to 21 The Planning Commission agreed with the proposed plat and the
roadway..plan.that proposed to terminate Interlachen-in a cul -de -sac at this time.
Mr. Hughes called the Council's attention to an issue mentioned in the staff report
concerning subdivision dedication. The subject property does adjoins Van Valkenburg
Park on its west side. The City could require a land dedication along the west
side to expand the park. The issue was referred to the Edina Park Board at its
meeting of March 12 and it was their view that in this case a cash dedication
should be required instead of a land dedication. It was the feeling that the
final design and location of improvements to Van Valkenburg Park have been set,
that the additional land would not be beneficial to the park and adequate buffering
would exist without the land dedication. Staff would recommend preliminary plat
approval subject to the following conditions: 1) developer's agreement, 2) revision
of street grades prior to final plat, 3) cash subdivision dedication and 4) that
Lot 4 and 5, Block.2, be retained as an outlot. The low.lying outlot would serve
as a temporary.storm water holding pond until a storm sewer can be extended to the
south. No further comment being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR INTERLACHEN HEIGHTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled " Interlachen Heights ", platted by Charles Loufek and presented
at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 1, 1985, be and is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval, subject to the conditions recommended by staff.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 2, BLOCK 1, LINDAHL'S ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented
the request for division of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition, located at 4233 -35
Valley View Road. The applicant requests a party -wall division of an existing
two - family dwelling. The applicant has applied for and received a waiver of the
City's requirement for separate utility connections. Staff would recommend approval.
No objection being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and
moved adoption: -
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition, and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the.subdivision of said tract into separate parcels
(herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Southerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition which lies
South of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant
36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the Easterly
line of said Lot 2, distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner
thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof,
and
Northerly Parcel: That part of Lot 2, Block 1, Lindahl's Addition which lies
North of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 2, distant
36.19 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof to a point on the Easterly
line of said Lot 2, Distant 41.23 feet Northerly of the Southeast corner
thereof, as measured along said Easterly line thereof.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
0 1_/
4/1/85
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CDBG PROGRAM BUDGET FOR YEAR XI APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by
Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented a proposed
budget for Year XI of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program, advising
that only one public hearing is required prior to submission of the application to
Hennepin County. Urban Hennepin County has been given a planning allocation of
$3,101,000 by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Year XI
of the program. Edina's share of $167,005 represents a decrease of $2,500 from
the previous year. With the exception of the proposed amount for removal of
slum and blight conditions, all projects are a continuation of those in existence
for the last several years. Mr. Larsen stated that Thomas Esser, Executive
Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council, has requested that the City
continue the same level of support from the CDBG Program for their H.O.M.E.
program. Removal of Slum and Blight Conditions, in the amount of $108,205, is
proposed as a new project for Year XI. The project would be targeted to redevelop-
ment activities in the Grandview Area Tax Increment District. The funds would most
likely be used to assist the redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel site, but may be
used on other redevelopment activities in the District. Staff would recommend
approval of the proposed budget and authorization for its submittal to Hennepin
County. No comments or objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR YEAR XI
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement
with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in the Urban County Community Deve-
lopment Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin
County CDBG funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds
was developed consistent with program rules:
Activity Budget Amount
Removal of Slum & Blight Conditions $108,205
Rehabilitation of Private Property 20,000
Public Services 8,800
Removal of Architectural Barriers 10,000
Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Development 10,000
Non - Profit Housing Sponsor 10,000
$167,005
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council approves the proposed use of Year XI
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes
submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen
Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XI Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of
Funds.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting April 15, 1985, as hearing date for
the following Planning matters:
1) Preliminary Plat - Willian C. Hansen Addition - Generally located south of
Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive.
2) Final Development. Plan - PRD -3 Planned Residential District and Preliminary
Plat - Edina Highpointe II - Generally located west of Cahill Road and north
of Amundson Avenue extended.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
4/1/85
PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE RIGHT OF WAY CONTINUED TO
APRIL 15, 1985. As recommended, Member Richard's motion was seconded by Member
Turner to continue the public hearing on vacation of portion of Lincoln Drive
right of way to the Council Meeting of April 15, 1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BRAEMAR MAINTENANCE BUILDING. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for construction of the Braemar Maintenance Building at Braemar
Golf Course, showing Keho Construction at $194,700, Phillips Klein Company at
$195,700, Fullerton Lumber at $197,500, Veit Construction at $201,593, Sunway Homes
at $201,900, Rocon Construction at $202,207, Dean & Associates at $209,600 and Olson
Concrete Company at $224,400. Motion of Member Richard was seconded by Member
Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Keho Construction, at $194,700.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR REDEVELOPMENT OF WELL #9. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids
for redevelopment of Well #9, showing Bergerson Caswell at $30,223.00, Keys Well
Drilling Company at $37,590.00, E. H. Renner & Sons at $43,603.00 and Layne Minnesota
at $57,860.00. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of
bid to low bidder, Bergerson Caswell, Inc., at $30,223.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
EXPENDITURE APPROVED FOR EMERGENCY FILTER REPAIR OF WELL #2 (WOODDALE). Mr. Rosland
advised the Council that emergency filter repairs are being made for Well #2 on Wood -
dale and that the cost is estimated at $15,000 to $20,000. Member Turner's motion was
seconded by Member Kelly, authorizing the necessary expenditure of.funds for the. ,.
emer.gency.repairs to the well.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR SAND, ROCK AND BITUMINOUS MATERIAL. Mr. Rosland presented tabula-
tion of bids for Concrete Sand (delivered) showing Prior Lake Aggregate recommended
low bidder at $2.80 per ton; Hassen Sand & Gravel and Sa -ag both at $2.90; Barton
Sand & Gravel at $3.15; Northwestern Aggregate at $3.54; and Wm. Mueller & Sons
at $4.95. Bids for Buck Shot (delivered) showing Hassen Sand & Gravel recommended
low bidder at $5.60 per ton; Sa -ag at $5.90; Northwestern Aggregate at $7.24; and
Barton Sand & Gravel at $8.55. Bids for Gravel Base (delivered) showing Barton Sand &
Gravel recommended low bidder at $3.90-per ton; Sa -ag at $4.05; Hassen.Sand & Gravel
at $4.10;--Bury & Carlson at $4.25; Prior Lake Aggregate at $4.50; Midwest. Asphalt
Corp. at $4.95; Northwestern Aggregate at $4.99; and Wm. Mueller & Sons at $5.65.
Bids for Limestone (delivered) showing Ed Kraemer & Sons recommended low bidder at
P4.28 per ton; Bryan Rock Products at $5.09; Barton Sand & Gravel at $5.10, Midwest
Asphalt Company at $5.35; and'Hassen Sand & Gravel at $6.40. Bids for Seal -Coat
Chips (delivered) showing T.C.I. Trap -Rock recommended low bidder at $12.19 per ton
and Hassen Sand & Gravel at $13.50. Bids for Ready Mix Bituminous #2331 (pick -up)
showing Bury & Carlson recommended bidder at $19.85 per ton and Midwest Asphalt
Corp. recommended alternate bidder at $19.95 based on shortest pick -up distance;
Commercial Asphalt at $18.40; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.00. Bids for Ready Mix
Bituminous 42331 Fine (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recommended bidder at $21.10
per ton and Midwest Asphalt Corp. recommended alternate bidder at $21.50 based on
shortest pick -up distance; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.00; and Commercial Asphalt at
$20.95. Bids for Ready Mix Bituminous 42341 (pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recom-
mended bidder at $21.75 per ton and Midwest Asphalt Corp. recommended alternate bidder
at $22.25 based on shortest pick -up distance; Wm. Mueller & Sons at $19.75; and
Commercial Asphalt at $21.40. Bids for Cut -Back Asphalt (delivered) showing Koch
Asphalt Company recommended sole bidder at $1.0222 per gallon. Bids for Winter Mix
(pick -up) showing Bury & Carlson recommended low bidder at $27.25 per ton; Wm. Mueller
& Sons at $28.00; and Midwest Asphalt Corp. at $28.50. Motion of Member Richards was.
seconded by Member Bredesen for award to recommended low bidder or alternate bidder
for concrete sand, buck shot, gravel base, limestone, seal -coat chips, ready mix
bituminous, cut -back asphalt and winter mix.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of
bids for hydrofluisilicic acid and liquid chlorine (water treatment chemicals)
showing Hawkins Chimical low bidder at $25.95; Dixie Petro Chemicals at $29.45;
and Jones Chemical at $37.93. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member
Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder Hawkins Chemical, Inc.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
/v G
4/1/85
DEMOLITION OF WOODDALE SCHOOL BUILDING AND IMPROVEMENTS TO SITE AUTHORIZED.
Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had given
concept approval on the recommendations of the consultant /staff regarding the
Wooddale School site, Utley Park and West 50th Street and had directed the staff
to prepare revised plans with costs that would incorporate the Council's wishes
on the three issues. Costs for the first section include:
Wooddale School demolition $175,000.00
Site improvement 25,000.00
42 parking spaces on east side of
Wooddale park 35,137.20
(includes construction cost, engineering and capitalized
interest)
Mr. Rosland pointed out that the estimated costs can be offset by the remaining
$75,000.00 from the School District, $100,000 from the Park Budget on a four -year
$25,000 per year contribution, $25,000 from the Developers' Fund, and a proposal
to develop an assessed project to St. Stephen's Church for the parking lot,
similar to the Colonial Church project at Countryside Park. If the Council
authorizes the staff recommendations, the Wooddale School building would be
demolished, the parking lot with access off Wooddale Avenue would be constructed
together with some site improvements to prepare its use as a park. As directed
by Council, input would be obtained from the neighborhood as to the design of the
park prior to award of bids for the work. Mr. Rosland advised that the Edina
Foundation Board met with representatives of the Edina Historical Society and
are considering the possibility of holding the Edinamite benefit at Wooddale School
as a summer celebration in conjunction with the Society on a tentative date of
July 13, and that demolition could start probably within the following week. With
regard to West 50th Street, Mr. Rosland reported that the variance procedure has
been initiated for the section from Wooddale Avenue to Halifax Avenue. He noted
that a formal public.hearing must be conducted for the West 50th Street recon-
struction project. Member Bredesen commented that with regard to the construction
of parking spaces on the Wooddale and Utley Park sites we should insure that
St. Stephens Church should participate by sharing in the cost of the entire project.
He reiterated that the proposed uses for the park should be discussed with the
neighborhood before final plans are set. Mr. Rosland indicated that the amount of
money recommended to be spent there would not complete the park as might be desired
and that at budget time the Council may wish to discuss further expenditures.
Donna Skagerberg, representing the Edina Historical Society was present and briefly
summarized a memorandum prepared by Foster Dunwiddie and herself regarding the need
to find other facilities for the Edina Historical Society's collection which is
now located in the Wooddale School. She noted that the Society currently occupies
3,100 sq. ft. on the lower level of the School and asked that the Council Members
start thinking about where the Society's new home may be located. Several proposed
locations have been identified which would perhaps form an Edina historical center
and the Society's goal.is to be relocated in time for the Edina Centennial in 1988
and to dedicate the entire project at that time. There being no further comment,
Member Turned moved the following action:
1) To approve the financing plan as outlined by. staff;.
2) To authorize plans and spceifications for the total demolition of the Wooddale
School building,
3) To negotiate with St. Stephen's Church for an assessed parking lot project,
using the Colonial Church /Countryside Park as a model,
4) To proceed with the initial park development after input from the neighborhood
to determine the best plan, and
5) To set August 1, 1985, as the date by which the Wooddale School building must
be vacated.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
JOAN LONSBURY NOMINATED TO METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION. Mayor
Courtney advised that Joan Lonsbury, Chairman of the Edina Park Board, has sub-
mitted her application for appointment to the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space
Commission and has asked for the Council's support of her nomination. Member
Turner thereupon moved adoption of the following resolution to be sent with a
letter of recommendation to the Metropolitan Council:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council is seeking applications to fill an opening on
The Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Commission, and
WHEREAS, Joan D. Lonsbury has served as a member of the Edina Park Board since
1972 and has provided leadership as chairman of the Board since 1981, and
WHEREAS, she chaired the Municipal Swimming Pool Committee from 1975 to 1980, and
WHEREAS, she has been a member of the Edina Art Center Board and the Art Center
Development Committee; and
( -D-1
85
WHEREAS, she has with great dedication shared her time and talents with the Edina
community by serving on numerous committees and as a member of various organizations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the name of
JOAN D. LONSBURY be submitted for appointment,to the Metropolitan Parks and Open
Space Commission.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REPORT GIVEN ON LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT. Mayor Courtney introduced Elliott Perovich,
Chairman of the Regional Transit Board (RTB), who was present to report on light
rail transit. Mr. Perovich said that Alison Fuhr, TRB Board Member, is doing an
excellent job in representing District 11 which includes Edina. He stated that
the light rail transit issue has been around for many years and there has always
been discussion about connecting Minneapolis and St. Paul by some type of rail
system. More recently, the Metropolitan Council has said that all metro transit
will be rubber - tired. In 1980 the legislature mandated to the Council that they
reconsider transit in the University Avenue and Southwest corridors to look for
a better alternative to the regular route bus service. A number of years ago
Hennepin County purchased the abandoned right of way of the C & NW Railroad from
downtown Minneapolis all the way out to Victoria. Hennepin County then entered
into a joint powers agreement with Minneapolis, who is interested in the Hiawatha
corridor, with St. Paul, who is interested in light rail between the cities, and
other suburban cities to do an implementation study. The study was to look at all
three corridors with the presumption that there were preferred alternatives to
the bus system. Following that study, the Regional Transit Board was formed whose
task it was to study all aspects of the transit issue and to then make a recommen-
dation to the Council.. In February, the Board decided that the University Avenue
corridor was a priority and that light rail was the recommended major mode of transit.
By approximately June, a contract for preliminary design and engineering on the
University corridor and connecting links will be awarded. The Board has set the
following schedule: 1) one and a half years for the preliminary design and engineer-
ing, 2) by December 1986 decide whether light rail is really feasible, 3) if it
is deemed feasible, necessary legislation will be sought in the 1987 session,
4) construction of track to begin in late 1987 or early 1988, and 5) approximately
2 to 3 years to complete the 10 plus miles of tract between Minneapolis and St. Paul.,
Mr. Perovich pointed out that whatever expenditure for the preliminary design and
engineering, that 70 to 75% of that expenditure will be useable for planning transit
in any of those corridors regardless of whether light rail is feasible or not, that
it would be a total transit analysis. The Board will also do a complete transit
needs analysis for the total metro area to try to identify the major transit
corridors and how to improve transit through the area. Estimated cost for the
University corridor is about $365,000,000 and if the system is routed underground
in downtown Minneapolis it would add about $80,000,000 to the cost. Mr. Perovich
also explained other functions of the RTB in addition to the light rail transit
issue. No action was taken by the Council.
(Mayor Courtney turned the chair over to Member Richards at this point and temporarily
left the meeting.)
FEASIBILITY REPORT 85 -2 FOR WESTWOOD COURT WATERMAIN APPROVED;' HEARING DATE SET.
City Engineer Hoffman presented Feability Report 85 -2, for construction of water -
main for Westwood Court which has been requested by .petition and recommended that
hearing date be set for April 15, 1985. Member Bredesen offered the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
WATERMAIN.IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -353
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, April 15, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less
than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected
properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
iJ
4/1/85
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -353
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, April 15, 1985,
at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed
under the authority granted by Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429. The approximate
cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below:
Estimated Cost
1. Westwood -Court Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -353 $75,559.37
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed improvement includes
Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2, Westwood Court.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED FOR PLAN APPROVAL AND AGREEMENT FOR TRAFFIC SIGNALS AT
BLAKE RD /VERNON AVENUE AND TRACY AVENUE /VERNON AVENUE. Mr. Hoffman explained
that it is necessary for the Council to adopt various resolutions for plan approval
and agreement for participation in construction of traffic signals at CSAH 158
(Blake Road /Vernon .Avenue and Tracy Avenue /Vernon Avenue). The estimated City
participation is $95,760.00 with $47,880.00 being regular State -Aid funding;
$31,920.00 being also a State =Aid funding requiring a resolution to expend it on
the County road system; and $15,960.00 estimated as local funds from the City's
budget. Hennepin County will fund $31,920.00 as.their normal participation. Staff
would recommend approval of the resolutions, including a resolution to expend an
estimated $31,920.00 on the County Road system from the City's municipal State -Aid
funds. Member Turner then introduced the following resolutions and moved their
adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8440 showing proposed traffic control
signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 and Blake Rd./
Olinger Blvd. for the construction thereof within the limits of the City as a County
State Aid project have been prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things approved.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, PLans for Hennepin County Project No. 8441 showing proposed traffic control
signal system at the intersection of County State Aid Highway 158 at Tracy Ave. for
the construction thereof within the limits of the City as a County State Aid
project have been prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things approved.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic
control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Blake Rd /Olinger Blvd.,
Hennepin County Project No. 8440, Agreement No. PW 03 -11 -85 has been prepared and
presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said Agreement be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement
No. PW 03711 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8440.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic
control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 158 at Tracy Ave., Hennepin
County Project No. 8441, Agreement No. PW - 04 -11 -85 has been prepared and presented
to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That the Agreement be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement
No. PW 04- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8441.
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE -AID FUNDS
To C.S.A.H. PROJECT
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to
participate in the cost of.a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 158
within the limits of said municipality, And
WHEREAS, Said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways
and identified in its records as S.A.P. No. 27- 758 -04, 120 - 152 -07 and 27- 758 -03,
120 - 147 -08;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal
State -Aid Street Funds the sum of $31,920.00 to apply toward the construction of
said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization.
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner
Resolutions adopted.
--109
4/1/85
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT APPROVED WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR 1494 /FRANCE AVENUE PROJECT.
Mr. Hoffman recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had approved
final plans for the 1494 /France Avenue interchange project and authorized expen-
diture of State -Aid funds for the project. Hennepin County is entering into an
agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) to cover all construc-
tion costs not borne by MNDOT. The cooperative agreement which Hennepin County
seeks with the City of Edina is a sub - agreement in which the City agrees to a
portion of the cost of the construction. Mr. Hoffman advised that staff has reviewed
the agreement and would recommend that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to sign
the agreement. The recommendation includes that all city funding be from our
Municipal State Aid Funds as determined to be eligible by the State -Aid Office of
MNDOT. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction on County State Aid
Highway No. 17 at I -494, Hennepin County Project 7927, Agreement No. PW 08 -11 -85
has been prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Agreement be in all things approved,
subject to all funding by the City be from the Municipal State Aid Fund.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign Agreement
No. PW- 08- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 7927.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner
Resolution adopted.
REDEVELOPMENT OF MANN DRIVE -IN THEATER PROPERTY IN BLOOMINGTON DISCUSSED. Mr. Hughes
advised that the Planning Department had received an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet (EAW).for the redevelopment of the Mann Drive -In Theater Property on
France Avenue in the City of Bloomington which is proposed by the Homart Develop-
ment Company. This large scale project proposes 1.5 million square feet of office
space and 350 hotel rooms for the 26.3 acre site which includes the Mann Theater
and Ramada Inn. The project proposes 5,100 parking spaces in a five -level parking
ramp. The EAW suggests that it will generate 17,925 vehicle trips daily. Mr. Hughes
explained that the EAW is the first step in the environmental review process. Because
of its size, this project will automatically require an Environmental Impact Statement.
The site is almost identical in size to the Edinborough site in Edina but would have
an anticipated traffic generation of about three and one -half times that of Edin-
borough. The proposed project, due to its.density, may adversely affect Edina from
a traffic and aesthetic standpoint. He stated that staff will attend an April 2
meeting concerning the EAW to learn more about the project and will keep the Council
advised of developments. The Council Members agreed that the proposed development
would have a deleterious effect on the entire area and it was suggested that the
Council Members contact members of the Bloomington City Council to express their
concern. Mr. Hoffman advised that he was meeting on April 3 with the traffic engineer
from Bloomington out on the site to discuss road patterns in the area. Mr. Hughes
stated that staff would bring an up -dated report back to the Council on April 15.
No formal action was taken.
(Mayor Courtney returned to the meeting at this point.)
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney stated that a list of
19 names had been submitted-by the Council Members as probable City Hall Space Study
Committee members. After discussion on how to select_the.committee it was informally
agreed that Members Richards and Turner should chose a chairman and then work with
that person to create a committee of about seven members, including the City Manager
or-his designee, and to have the committee in place by April 15,..1985.
BONN PROPERTY PROPOSED AS GIFT TO.CITY. Member Richards reported that Mrs. Jessie
Bonn, 6005 Pine Grove Road, is proposing to donate approximately the south half of
her property to the City, estimated..at one acre.in.size. The subject property
would be contiguous at least in part to the Carson property that is already in
City ownership. Member Richards said that he had told Mrs. Bonn that, as with the
Carson property, the City might assist in a survey and appraisal of the parcel..
and do the necessary paperwork if the City was_.willing to accept the property. No
objection being heard, Member Richards made a motion that the staff be directed to
assist Mrs. Bonn in a survey and appraisal of the property and determine what .
documents will be needed in order that Mrs. Bonn may convey the property to the City
of Edina as a donation. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND CITY PLANNER APPOINTMENTS ANNOUNCED.
Mr. Rosland advised
that due.to the resignation of Mark Bernhardson, he was appointing Gordon Hughes to
the position of Assistant City Manager and appointing Craig Larsen to the position of
City Planner, effective as of April 29, 1985.
//0
4/1/85
SENIOR POLICE RESERVE ACTIVITIES REPORTED. Mr. Rosland reported that each Senior
Police Reserve Officer has now signed a contract and has agreed to fulfill.his.con-
tractural assignments for which he is paid. At the end of the contract period each
officer must summarize his duties and activities. This has resulted in having all
of the reserve officers actively performing various tasks or participating in programs
that have been developed by the Police Department. No action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION FOR EDINA VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS RELIEF
ASSOCIATION. Mr. Rosland stated that Bill Hansen and LeRoy Lisk were present on
behalf of the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association to request the Council's
support for pending legislation. Mr. Hansen explained that in 1979 legislation
was passed relating to firefighters relief associations but that provision for
survivors' benefits was somehow not included in the state -wide law. He introduced
William A. Bierman, of the firm of Sieloff and Bierman, who had formerly worked
for the Minnesota Senate.to explain the proposed legislation. Mr. Bierman said
that the proposed legislation would repeal a portion of a special law relating to
the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association with regard to survivors'
benefits. If the legislation is passed, the state -wide law would come into place.
In seeking to come under the state -wide law by repealing the special law the
Edina Association does not seek to change any benefits that it now pays, but it
would allow increases in survivors' benefits over a period of time if the funding
in the association were sufficient. He added that the chief author of the bill,
H.F. 1273, is Mary Forsythe who has advised that the legislative tradition in
the House favors approval of all local bills by the local governing body. Mr. Lisk,
treasurer of the Edina Association, stated that currently under the special law
the survivors' benefit and funeral benefit is frozen at $135 /mo. and this change
in law would permit -an increase in the benefits in the future if warranted. After
some discussion, Member Kelly offered the following resolution and moved adoption:
RFC0T.TTTT0W
WHEREAS, the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association was established to
provide benefits for Edina's Volunteer Firefighters; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Association had been governed under a special law, Laws of
Minnesota (1965) Chapter 592, as amended by Chapter 644 (1969), and Chapter 229
(1975); and
WHEREAS, the 1979 State Legislature passed the Codified Chapter 424A of Minnesota
Statutes to standardize governance and eliminate special laws governing these
individual associations, repealing the section of Edina's special law relating
to pension benefits; and
WHEREAS, House File 1273 /Senate File 1292 repeals the special Edina law relating
to survivor benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina supports
the passage of House File 1273 /Senate File 1292.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CROCKER AND CROWELL'S FIRST ADDITION
DISCUSSED. Mr. Hoffman advised that a letter has been received from Jon Otterlei,
4704 Merilane, asking that a release be initiated to approve the return of Lot 8,
Block 3, Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the State so that the land may
be purchased for the purpose of building a single or duplex home on the lot.
Mr. Hoffman recalled that the lots were acquired from the State by the City of Morn -
ingside originally for storage of public waters - running off streets in the area.
However, there is now no runoff of water from the streets because of construction
of storm sewers and the property is no longer required for that purpose. He noted
that there is some drainage of water from Lot 8 and Lot 19 into the adjacent
properties in St. Louis Park. Mr. Hoffman identified two concerns that should be
considered before taking any action on the request: 1) that the immediate neighbors
should be notified of the request, and 2) the impact of adding hard surface to
Lot 8 on the properties in St. Louis Park. It was informally agreed by the Council
that the neighbors should be notified and the matter then be brought back for
action by the Council.
WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR BLOCKS 6 AND 7,
FINDELL CLARK ADDITION AUTHORIZED ON 100% PETITION. Being advised that a 100%
petition had been received for construction of watermain, storm sewer and sanitary
sewer for Block 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, Member Bredesen offered the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS UPON PETITION THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting
the Council to construct watermain, storm sewer and sanitary sewer improvements
on Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, and to assess the entire cost against
the property of petitioners and that said petition has been signed by all owners
of real property abutting on said street where said improvements -are to be located.
4/1/85
2. The making of said improvement -in accordance with said petition is hereby
ordered pursuant to Minnesota Stautues, Section 429.031 (3), (Session Laws of
1961, Chapter 525, Section 2). Said improvements are hereby designed and shall be
referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows:
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -453
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -175
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -369
The entire cost of said improvements is hereby ordered to be assessed against
the properties abutting on said Blocks 6 and 7, Findell Clark Addition, where said
improvements are to be located.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1 (ON -SALE WINE LICENSES) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland
recalled that at its meeting of March 18, 1985, the Council had given First Reading
to Ordinance No. 902 -A1 To Allow Sales of Wine Only in Qualifying Restaurants. At
that meeting it appeared that there were still some issues on which the Council
Members differed and staff would recommend the following procedure: a) that any
amendments to the language in the First Reading be amended prior to passage of Second
Reading, b) that if Second Reading is given, any changes then would.be written into
the ordinance, and c) that some action be taken regarding the license fees. No com-
ment being.heard, Member Richards moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance
No. 902 -A1. Motion was seconded by Mayor Courtney. Member Kelly then moved that
the draft ordinance be amended in Section 42 to delete the provision that all person- ..
nel who serve wine be licensed and to substitute the provision that a licensed
manager in charge must be on the premises at all times that the restaurant is open
for business. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen, Richards
Motion carried.
Member Turner moved that the draft ordinance be amended to provide for termination
of all on -sale wine licenses after five years so that the ordinance would be reviewed
by the Council at that time. The motion to amend was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly, Richards
Motion carried.
City Attorney Erickson recommended that some minor changes be made to the draft
ordinance: 1) that the definition of "person" delete the phrase "and includes
also the municipal liquor store ", 2) that the ordinance be in full force and effect
upon its passage and publication, and 3) that no license shall be effective prior
to -July 1, 1985. The recommended minor changes were approved by unanimous vote of
the Council.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A1,
amended as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A1
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO
ALLOW SALES OF WINE ONLY IN QUALIFYING RESTAURANTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. To Section 1 the following definitions are added and
amended as follows:
"Bar" means a counter or similar kind of place or structure at which wine is
served but not in conjunction with regular full menu service.
"City" means the City of Edina.
"Commissioner" means the State Commissioner of Public Safety.
"Council" means the Council of the City of Edina.
"Licensed Premises" means the area shown in the application as the place where
wine will be served and consumed.
"Meal" means entrees and sandwiches offered on a restaurant menu.
"Person" means and includes any individual, partnership, association, trust,
institution, corporation or municipality.
"Restaurant" means an establishment, under control of a single proprietor or
manager, having appropriate facilities for serving meals and where in consideration
of payment therefor, meals are regularly served at tables to the general public,.
and which employs an adequate staff to provide the usual and suitable service to its
guests. definition amends and supersedes the definition of "Cafe" or
"restaurant" in Ordinance No. 902.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
"Wine" means vinous beverage created by fermentation.
Sec. 2. Sec. 21, No Liquor in Restaurants, is hereby amended by adding at the
beginning thereof the words "Except as permitted under Part H of this Ordinance, ".
Sec. 3. Part H. is hereby added as follows:
r/�
4/1/85
PART H.
ON SALE OF WINE ONLY IN RESTAURANTS."
Sec. 36. License Required; Term of License.
(a) No person shall, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any
device, sell for on -sale any wine at or under 14% by volume in conjunction with the
sale of food without first having received a license therefor pursuant to this Part H.
(b) On -sale wine licenses shall be issued only to qualifying restaurants as
determined below, holding a valid food establishment license under Ordinance No. 731.
(c) Manager's licenses shall be issued only to qualifying individuals as
determined below.
(d) No license issued under this Part H shall be effective prior to 12:01 A.M.
on July 1, 1985.
(e) Every license issued under this Part H shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on the
July 1 following its date of issuance, except that licenses issued prior to
July 1, 1985 shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1986.
Sec. 37 Licensing Procedure.
(a) The provisions of Ordinance No. 141 of the City shall apply to all licenses
issued under this Part H and to the holders of such licenses, except that on -sale
wine licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied by the Council, and
except that manager's licenses and renewals thereof shall be granted or denied
by the City Manager. Additionally, all on -sale wine licenses must be approved
by the Commissioner. Every person licensed, or applying for an on -sale wine
license, under this ordinance, in addition to other requirements imposed
by this ordinance for the obtaining or renewal of such a license, shall demon-
strate proof of financial responsibility with regard to liability imposed by Minne-
sota Statutes, Section 340.95, to the City Clerk, as a condition to the issuance or
renewal of such license, in the manner and to the extent required by Minnesota
Statute, Section 340.11, Subdivision 21, provided, if any such licensee or applicant
claims exemption from the requirements of said statute, proof of such exemption
shall be established by affidavit given by such licensee or applicant, such '
affidavit to be in form and substance acceptable to the City Clerk.
(b) In addition to the requirements set forth in paragraph (a) of this section,
the applicant shall, in the application form, provide all information required by
the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety and such other information as
deemed necessary by the City during the application process to determine compliance
with the provisions of this ordinance and applicable State laws and regulations.
(c) Applications for the renewal of an existing on -sale wine license shall
be made at least 60 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior to the date
of expiration of the license. Applications for renewal of an existing manager's
license shall be made at least 30 days prior to and not earlier than 150 days prior
to the date of expiration of the license. The renewal application may incorporate
by reference all information contained in the original application, to the extent
such information is then true, current and applicable. If, in the judgment of the
City Council as to on -sale wine licenses, and in the judgment of the City Manager
as to Manager's licenses, good and sufficient cause for the applicant's.failure
to apply for a renewal within the time provided is shown, the City Council, or
City Manager, as the case may be, may, if the other provisions of this ordinance
are complied with, grant the application notwithstanding such failure to timely
apply.
(d) No on -sale wine license shall be transferred to any person or premises
by the person or from the premises to whom and for which the license was granted,
by any means whatsoever, including, without limitation, devise, descent or invol-
untarily by the operation of law, without the person and premises to whom and to
which the license is to be transferred having first submitted an application
containing all of the information required in an original application, and comply-
ing with all requirements for an original license, and receiving the'approval
of the Council, and where required, the Commissioner, provided that an application
for transfer may refer to, and incorporate therein by reference,'the information
set forth in the original application for the license to be transferred, to the
extent such information is then true, current and applicable.
. (e) Manager's license shall be personal to the person to whom it is issued
and shall not be transferable.
(f) Any change in the persons named in the original application for an
on -sale wine license or any change in such original application, as required by
Sec. 37 of this ordinance, including any increase in the size or seating capacity
of the licensed premises, shall be deemed a transfer for purposes_ of this ordinance;
provided, however, if the licensee is a limited partnership, a change in the
limited partners of 10% or less cumulatively over the then license period shall
not be deemed a transfer; and provided further, however, that if the licensee is
a corporation, a change in stock ownership of 10% or less cumulatively over the
then license period shall not be deemed a transfer.
Sec. 38. Financial Requirements for an On -Sale Wine License.
(a) Investigation Fees and Deposit - At the time of original application,
the applicant shall deposit $500 with the City of Edina for the Investigation Fee.
t.
4/1%85
Should the investigation require an out -of -state investigation, an additional
$2,000 shall be deposited prior to further processing of'the application by the
City. The cost of the investigation shall be based on the expense involved, but
in no event shall it exceed $500`if the investigation is limited to the State of
Minnesota or $10,000 if outside the State. All deposit monies not expended on
the investigation shall be refunded to the applicant. All investigative expenses
incurred in excess of the deposit shall be paid prior to consideration of the
license application by the Council. Investigation fees for license renewal shall
not exceed $100 unless there is a change of ownership of more than 10% cumulatively
over the then existing license period as provided in Section 37(f) of this
ordinance.
(b) License Fees - The applicable fees are listed in Ordinance No. 171.
Licenses terminated by the licensee prior to the end of the term shall be prorated
quarterly with fees being refunded for any quarter or quarters in which the license
was not used. All fees shall be paid at the time of filing the license application.
Should any license application be withdrawn or denied, the fee shall be refunded
except for $75. Provided, however, if denied because of willful misstatement in
the application, no refund shall be made.
(c) Bond and Insurance - The same requirements set forth in Sec. 11 of this
ordinance apply to licenses under Part H. The insurance requirements set out in
Sec. 37 of this Ordinance must be met prior to issuance of a license under this
Part H.
(d) Other Fees - All fees, assessments and taxes delinquent at the time of
license issuance must be paid prior to issuance of the license as required by
Section 12(f) of this ordinance.
Sec. 39. Conditions of Licensing for an On -Sale Wine License. In addition
to the conditions set forth in Sec. 12(d) and (e) and Sec. 13(d), the following
conditions apply both as a condition of on -sale wine license approval and ongoing
license retention:
(a) Licensee - The on -sale wine licensee must:
1) Be of good moral character and repute.
2) Be of legal drinking age.
3) Be eligible under Minnesota Statutes Ch. 340, and the regulations
promulgated by the Commissioner.
4) Be an individual owner, a partnership or a corporation.
5) If an individual, not have (A) been convicted, within the five years
prior to the application for a license, of any violation of any law of the
United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other state or territory, or of
any local ordinance with regard to: (i) the manufacture, sale, distribution or
posession for sale or distribution of intoxicating liquor or other controlled
substances; (ii) gambling; (iii) theft; or (iv) vice; or (B) had an intoxicating
liquor license, including a wine -only on -sale license, revoked for any violation
of any statutes, ordinances or regulations relating to the manufacture, sale,
distribution or possession of intoxicating liquor or wine.
6) Have a manager, licensed under Sec. 42 of this Part H, in charge of and
on the licensed premises at all times during which the licensed premises are
open for business.
7) Sign a statement indicating that he or she has reviewed and understands
the pertinent sections of this Ordinance and of State laws and regulations.
8) Not have applied for nor hold a federal wholesale or retail liquor
dealer's special stamp or a federal or state gambling or gaming stamp or license.
9) Not be an employee or elected official of the City of Edina.
10) Not have falsified any information given either in the application or in
the process of investigation.
11) On renewal, not have been found in violation of any provision of this
ordinance or applicable State stautues or regulations.
12) If an individual, be a U.S. citizen.
13) Not be financially indebted to a person who is disqualified under
subparagraphs 5, 7 and 11 of this paragraph (a).
(b) Licensed Premises The licensed premises must meet the following require-
ments:
1) Be in a PC1, -PC2 or PC3, or Mixed Development District or be in a
restaurant permitted in the R -1 District, as established by the City Zoning
Ordinance.
2) Have an exclusive entrance from or exit to the exterior of the building
in which the licensed premises are located._ Entrances from or exits to a public
concourse or public lobby meet this requirement.
3) Be under the control of the licensee.
4) Be a restaurant having facilities for seating not fewer than 25 guests
at one time.
5) Have a valid food establishment license and have a kitchen approved by
the City Public Health Sanitarian.
6) Have appropriate space for storage, preparation or other handling or
service of food which is not adversely impacted by the storage and service of
wine.
I / V
4/1/85
7) Have a physical barrier between non - licensed premises and the licensed
premises which prevents the passing of patrons from the licensed premises to
areas outside of the licensed premises, except for approved and required entrances
to and exists from the restaurant portion of the licensed premises. This includes,
but is not limited to, licensed premises outside a building or in a public, or
quasi - public, mall, concourse, plaza or similar area.
8) Be in compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances, statutes and
regulations. .
Sec. 40. Conditions of Sale. In addition to the conditions stated in Sec. 12(a),
(b), (g) and (h), Sec. 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31 and 33, the following
apply to on -sale wine licenses issued under this Part H:
(a) No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a
meal to be consumed with the wine.
(b) No wine over 14% alcohol by volume may be sold or consumed.
(c) No sales or consumption of wine shall be permitted at a bar or beyond
the licensed premises.
(d) Wine may not be sold, served or consumed in containers larger in
volume than one liter.
. '(e) No person working in the licensed premises may be under the established
legal drinking age except buspersons, dishwashers,.musicians, waiters and
waitresses, provided that they shall not serve or sell wine.
(f) No licensee shall promote the consumption of wine on the licensed
premises by any means or methods which result in wine prices which are less than
those normally charged on the then regularly -used menu, including, but not limited
to, two- for -one or similar offers, prizes, coupons, games or barters.
(g) No licensee shall sell, offer for sale or keep for sale wine in any
original package that has been refilled or partly refilled. No licensee shall
directly, or through any other person, dilute, or in any manner tamper with,
the contents of any original package so as to change its composition or alcoholic
content while in the original package. Possession on the premises by the licensee
of any wine in the original package differing in composition, alcoholic content
or type from the wine received from the manufacturer or wholesaler from whom it
was purchased shall be prima facie evidence that the contents of the original
package have been diluted, changed or tampered with.
(h) Licensees under this Part H may sell wine during the same hours on
Sunday as holders of Sunday sale licenses may sell intoxicating liquor.
(i) The City inspections authorized by Sec. 12(g) of this ordinance are
anticipated to be made at least twice during each license period.
(j) All applicable provisions of State statutes and regulations shall be
complied with in connection with the on -sale of wine.
Sec. 41. Suspension and Revocation. The enforcement, suspension and
revocation provisions of Ordinance No. 141 shall apply to all licenses issued
under Part H of this ordinance, except to the extent inconsistent with applicable
State statutes and regulations, and in the event of such inconsistencies, the
State statutes and regulations shall apply.
Sec. 42. Manager's License.
(a) The manager(s) or persons(s) in charge of a licensed premise shall be
an individual or individuals.
(b) Each individual manager shall apply for an individual manager's license
on application forms provided by the City Clerk. The application shall be
processed in a manner similar to that for an on -sale wine license. Each applica-
tion shall describe the licensed premises to be managed by the applicant. The
manager's license shall be restricted to the licensed premises described in the
application.
(c) No investigative fees shall be required for a manager's license appli-
cation, but if investigated with an application for an on -sale wine license and
if investigation of the proposed manager for the licensed premises results in
additional expense, or out -of -state investigation, additional deposits may be
required to be made under Sec. 38.
(d) The applicant for a manager's license, in order to be granted a
manager's license hereunder, shall and must comply with all requirements of this
ordinance, State statutes and regulations which are applicable to an applicant
for a manager's license under this Part H, and including, without limitation,
Sec. 39(a) and Sec. 40 of this Part H.
(e) The license fee is listed in Ordinance No. 171. The provisions of
Sec. 38(b) apply to this Sec. 42, except that no refund of the license fee shall
be made.
Sec. 43. Automatic Termination. The provisions of this Part H shall terminate
automatically at 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1990. No licenses shall be issued under
this Part H after said time and date. All licenses then previously issued under
this Part H also shall automatically terminate at such time and date and thereafter
no wine shall be sold under such licenses.
Sec. 44. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
�lLD
4/1/85
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
Mayor
Acting City Clerk
Mr. Rosland then reviewed the fees that were recommended by staff,.based on best
estimates of cost, as follows: 50 seats or fewer - $550, 51 to 100 seats - $600,
101 to 150 seats - $650, and over 150 seats - $700. Member Bredesen commented that
license applicants should be told that-the license fees may change in the future if
costs are above or below present estimates. Member Richards asked if the license
fee could be based upon actual.cost. Attorney Erickson explained that the separate
investigation fee will be based on actual expense involved, with all deposit monies
not expended on the investigation being either applied to the license fee or refunded
to the applicant. License.fees are required to be fair estimates of the costs in-
curred in issuing the licenses and in monitoring the licensed premises. It was noted
that the on -sale wine license fee cannot exceed one -half the fee for on -sale liquor
licenses. After some discussion, Member Richards introduced Ordinance No. 171 -A20
for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A20
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE
AND TO ESTABLISH FEE FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number of Schedule A to
Ordinance No. 171 is amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC..
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
902 10 Intoxicating liquor $1,400.00 per year 36b
on -sale license
Sec. 2. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171.is hereby amended by adding the following
thereto:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF.FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
902 38(b) On -sale wine license Per year, restaurants with 36g
50 seats or fewer $550.00
51 -.100 seats, inclusive 600.00
..101 - 150 seats, inclusive 650.00.
Over 150 seats 700.00
902 42(e) Manager's license 36h
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
First Reading granted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS.
As recommended by staff, Member Turner'.s motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting
April 15, 1985, as the hearing date for preliminary approval of $12,000,000 Hospital
System Revenue bonds.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PAYMENT OF 911 CHARGES FOR ALI SERVICES AUTHORIZED. Mr. Rosland recalled that when
the 911 System was put in place in December of 1982, there were three levels, of
service available: 1) automatic routing, in which a telephone dialing 911 anywhere in
Edina would be automatically routed to Edina's dispatch office, 2) automatic number
identification (ANI), in which the telephone number of the calling party would be
displayed at the dispatch center, and 3) automatic location identification (ALI), in
which the address of the calling number would be displayed at the dispatch office.
It was the understanding of the cities when 911 was established that the State would
pick up the automatic rounting costs together with the costs for the ANI service.
The cost for ALI equipment at our dispatch point was to be funded by us, and that the
initial capital cost, together with the ongoing servicing costs of the central
computer for ALI would be funded by the counties. In June of 1983, the City was in-
formed by Northwestern Bell that Hennepin County had been released from their contract
to pay for the ALI ongoing charges and that they were attempting to come to the cities
to collect those charges. .Since then the independent Primary Service Answering
Points (PSAP's) have been attempting to reach a compromise with the County.i The County
has finally agreed to accept the compromise that the.cities had proposed which was
that the County would pick -up all the ALI costs up through July 1, 1984, and from
/,/ ('7,
4/1/85
thereon the individual cities would pick up their.own costs. Montly costs for
Edina are estimated at $457.00 per month. Staff would recommend that a resolution
be adopted ratifying the County's action and that when Northwestern Bell does come
forth with a contract amendment, that it then be ratified and the appropriate billings
be paid. No comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution
and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the other independent PSAP's in Hennepin County
initially selected the ALI feature of 911, in part based on the County's apparent
agreement to refund the monthly service charges related to ALI, and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has adamantly refused to pay those charges as an obligation
since the inception of 911, and
WHEREAS, a majority of. the independent PSAP's proposed a compromise in which
Hennepin County would pick up all charges through June 30, 1984, and
WHEREAS, in that compromise the City of Edina would pay the applicable monthly
charges for the ALI service in addition to the equipment charges they are already
paying from July 1, 1984, forward, and
WHEREAS, it is of greater benefit to the taxpayers of the City of Edina, to pay
its own charges rather than having the County pay its charges even though the
City of Edina taxpayers still pay a portion of the ALI-costs for the dependent..
cities;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina agrees
to the compromise ratified by the Hennepin County Board on March 14, 1985,
relevent to 911 ALI charges.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment of
the following claims as per Pre -List dated 4/1/85: General Fund $77,268.72, Park
Fund $9,600.00, Art Center $1,654.42, Golf Course Fund $11,843.45, Recreation
Center Fund $2,826.95, Gun Range Fund $150.51, Utility Fund $6,796.90, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $1,103.11, Construction Fund $2,033.39, Total $113,277.65; and
for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 2/28/85: General Fund
$150,034.91, Park Fund $1,414.31, Art Center $820.59, Swimming Pool Fund $65.53,
Golf Course Fund $431.19, Recreation Center Fund $6,847.67, Gun Range Fund $512.25,
Utility Fund $17,374.90, Liquor Dispensary Fund $251,338.82, Total $428,840.17.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
Acting City Clerk
tt-7-)
1985 AMENDMENTS TO THE
SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
of
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Recitals and Statement of Authority
B. Definitions
C. Statement of Need
D. Statement of Objectives
II. 1985 Project
A. Description of 1985 Project
1. 1984 Project Area
2. Conditions of Blight
3. Redevelopment Activities
B. Development of 1985 Project Area
1. Use
2. Redevelopment Agreements
C. Relocation
D. Interest Reduction Program
III. Financing of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985 Project
A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost
1. Estimated Public Redevelopment Cost
2. Capital Proceeds of 1985 Project
3. Public Redevelopment Cost
B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985 Project
1. In General
2. Issuance of Bonds
3. Bond Terms
4. Security for and Payment of Bonds
IV. Implementation of 1985 Project and Plan
A. In General
B. Cooperation Agreement
V. Additional Amendments to Plan
VI. Original Plan
VII. Exhibits
Exhibit A - Legal description of tax parcels or portions
thereof included in 1984 Project Area
Exhibit B - Site Plan
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Recitals and Statement of Authority. The
Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council have previously
approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, which
established a tax increment financing district as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9. It has been
proposed that the 1985 Project Area, as hereinafter defined, be
developed as a mixed use development containing residential
condominium units, retail areas, office buildings, rental
apartments for the elderly and public and private amenities.
This 1985 Amendment supplements and amends the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan to provide for the redevelopment of the 1985
Project Area. This 1985 Amendment is established by action of
the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council of the City,
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and this 1985
Amendment is approved by such bodies pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462 and Sections 273.71 to 273.86.
B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined
in this Section shall for all purposes of this First Amendment,
have the meanings given to them in this Section:
"Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all
taxable property in the District as determined from time to
time pursuant to state law.
"Bonds" means the bonds or obligations, now or
hereafter issued by the City or the HRA (which may be in one or
more issues) to finance the acquisition of the 1985 Project
Area (and related costs), to finance the purchase of the HRA
Public Improvements and related costs, to finance interest
reductions to be made by the HRA pursuant to this Agreement and
related costs, to finance construction of the Park, to pay
assessments against the Condominium Project Area for City
Public Improvements, and other public redevelopment costs to be
paid by the HRA with respect to the 1985 Project, and also
means and includes all other bonds of the City issued prior to
the date of this Agreement and secured in whole or in part by
the tax increment generated by the Redevelopment Plan area and
the improvements thereon. The term "Bonds" shall also include
any bonds or obligations issued to refund any Tax Increment
Bonds.
"Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions,
ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any
Bonds are sold, issued or secured.
"Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project" means all
amounts received or to be received by the City or the HRA from
the sale or lease of property in the 1985 Project Area.
"Captured Assessed Value" means that portion of the
Assessed Value in excess of the Original Assessed Value as
adjusted from time to time, if any.
"City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
"City Public Improvements" means streets, roads,
curbs, gutters, sidewalks and utilities to be constructed and
installed by the City and for which special assessments will be
assessed against some or all of the 1985 Project Area.
"Condominium Development" means the approximately
three hundred and ninety -two (392) residential condominiums and
approximately six hundred (600) underground, private parking
spaces, to be constructed in approximately seven (7) phases on
the Condominium Project Area, including related and appurtenant
landscaping, driveways, walkways and improvements, with respect
to which at least eighty (80 %) percent of the residential units
therein shall be reserved for sale to, and sold to, families or
individuals with an adjusted gross income which is equal to or
less than one hundred ten (110 %) percent of the Median Family
Income.
"Condominium Project Area" means the seven (7) areas
approximately identified as such on the Site Plan.
"Developer" means any person acquiring any portion of
the 1985 Project from the HRA or any other person and
constructing any of the Private Improvements.
"District" means the tax increment financing district
established by the Plan.
"Elderly Housing Development" means the approximately
two hundred two (202) rental units for elderly occupancy (of
which at least twenty (20 %) percent shall be rented to families
or individuals who on the date of their initial occupancy of
their rental unit are individuals of low or moderate income
within the meaning of Section 103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, and the regulations promulgated or
proposed thereunder, as now or hereafter amended) in the
approximately seventeen (17) story building to be constructed
on the Elderly Housing Project Area, and shall include the
Elderly Housing Project Area, related covered and surface
parking, congregate dining facilities, a public restaurant with
approximately two hundred fifty (250) seats, a gift shop, a
child care facility with a capacity of approximately one
hundred (100) children, and related and appurtenant
landscaping, driveways, walkways and improvements.
-2-
"Elderly Housing Project Area" means approximately the
area identified as such on the Site Plan.
"HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Edina.
"HRA Public Improvements" means the public easements,
and certain landscaping, utilities, streets, driveways,
sidewalks, surface and covered parking and other work on the
1985 Project Area to be constructed by the HRA at the HRA's
cost, but shall not include the Park.
"Office Development" means the approximately two
hundred five thousand (205,000) square feet of office space to
be constructed on the Office Project Area, including related
and appurtenant covered and surface parking, landscaping,
driveways, walkways and improvements, to be constructed in two
phases of approximately one hundred seven thousand (107,000)
square feet and ninety -eight thousand (98,000) square feet,
respectively, in two (2) buildings of six (6) to eight (8)
stories each.
"Office Project Area" means approximately the two (2)
areas identified as such on the Site Plan.
"Original Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of
all taxable property in the District as most recently
determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of
Minnesota, as of the date of certification thereof by the
County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76.
or as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76.
"Original Plan" means the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan, as hereto amended and supplemented by the
HRA and the City Council pursuant to law.
"Outstanding" when used with respect to Bonds, means
Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed and prepaid or
discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a
Bond Resolution.
"Parcel" means a lot, parcel, tract or plat of land
comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real
estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan.
"Park" means the public park to be constructed upon
the Park Site, including all landscaping, recreational
facilities and equipment, and other amenities therein or
related thereto upon the Park Site.
-3-
"Park Site" means approximately the area identified as
such on the Site Plan.
"Plan" means the Original Plan as supplemented and
amended by this 1985 Amendment and as further supplemented and
amended from time to time by the HRA and City Council.
"Private Improvements" means the Condominium
Development, the Office Development and the Elderly Housing
Development.
"Public Redevelopment Cost" means the total amount
expended and to be expended by the City and /or the HRA on
Redevelopment Activities, less the Capital Proceeds of the 1985
Project.
"Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or
to be taken: (1) by the HRA in establishing, implementing and
carrying out the 1985 Project, including but not limited to the
acquisition of the 1985 Project Area, the acquisition and
construction of the HRA Public Improvements,'the carrying out
of an interest reduction program with respect to the
Condominium Development and Elderly Housing Development, and
the acquisition and construction of the Park; (2) by the City
in aid of the 1985 Project pursuant to the Plan, including, but
not limited to, the acquisition and construction of the City
Public Improvements; and (3) by private developers in
constructing the Private Improvements.
"Redevelopment Agreement" means any and all agreements
between the HRA or the City, or both and a Developer with
respect to the 1985 Project.
"Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem
taxes levied on all taxable property in the District from time
to time which is allocable to the Captured Assessed Value of
such property.
"Project" means all of the Private Improvements, the
Park and all of the HRA Public Improvements constructed or to
be constructed upon the Project Area, and includes the Project
Area.
"1985 Project Area" means the entire parcel of land
upon which the Project is or is to be constructed, as more
fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a
part hereof.
C. Statement of Need. There exists in the City a
shortage of decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing for
the elderly and persons of low and moderate income and the HRA,
-4-
as in the past, is desirous of promoting the development of
housing for the elderly and other persons in the City. There
is a need for redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area which will
result in the increase of employment opportunities for
residents of the City, the increase of the value of property
subject to taxation by the City and other local government
units, and the increase of general economic activity in the
City, all of which will reduce unemployment, prevent chronic
unemployment, improve living standards, promote desirable
development of 1985 Project Area at a cost reasonably related
to the public purpose to be served without residential
clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of
beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment for a
use consistent with emphasis on housing for the elderly and
persons of low and moderate income, prevent the emergence of
blighted property and areas, prevent the loss of skilled and
unskilled labor and other human resources, add to the cultural
facilities available to the public in the City, and encourage
and enhance the general health and welfare of the residents of
the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken by the City
with respect to the 1985 Project are necessary to secure the
redevelopment of the property included in the 1985 Project
Area, at this time and in a manner which will best meet those
needs.
D. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to
be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and
carrying out the 1985 Project and in financing of the Public
Redevelopment Cost thereof. as specified herein, are to meet
the needs specified in paragraph C:
a. by promoting and securing the prompt redevelopment
of the property in the 1985 Project Area in a manner
consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans
and with a minimal adverse impact on the environment, a
portion of which property is not now in productive use;
b. by promoting and securing additional employment
opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding
area, thereby improving living standards, reducing
unemployment, and preventing areas of chronic unemployment
and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human
resources;
c. by promoting and securing additional housing for
the elderly, persons of low and moderate income and other
residents of the City and surrounding area at a reasonable
cost, thereby enhancing living conditions and their general
health and welfare;
-5-
d. by securing the increase of property subject to
taxation by the City, Hennepin County and the school
district in which the 1985 Project Area is located, and
other local government taxing jurisdictions, in order to
better ensble such entities to pay for public improvements
and governmental services and programs required to be
provided by them; and
e. by undertaking and providing moneys for the
payment of the cost of Redevelopment Activities in or
adjacent to the 1985 Project Areaa which are necessary to
serve the 1985 Project Area and for the orderly and
beneficial development of the 1985 Project Area and
adjacent areas of the City.
II. 1985 PROJECT
A. Description of 1985 Project.
1. 1985 Project Area. The 1985 Project Area is
unimproved and comprises approximately acres of property
located in the City. The legal description of the 1985 Project
Area is as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The 1985
Project Area is presently owned by the HRA.
2. Conditions of Blight. The 1985 Project Area is
blighted by virtue of conditions of unusual and difficult
physical characteristics of the ground and other conditions
which has prevented normal development of the land by private
enterprise and has resulted in stagnant and unproductive
conditions of land. However, the 1985 Project Area is
potentially useful and valuable for redevelopment which would
contribute to the general health, safety and welfare of the
residents of the City. The 1985 Project Area will not be
reasonably available for redevelopment by private enterprise.
or redeveloped by private enterprise, in the forseeable future,
unless the blighting conditions thereof are removed. The City
and the HRA can remove, or cause or assist a Developer to
remove, such blighting conditions, and to redevelop the 1985
Project Area by construction and installation thereon of the
Private Improvements and the Park by jointly exercising the
powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose.
3. Redevelopment Activities. The 1985 Project
includes the following Redevelopment Activities:
a. By the City or the HRA, directly or pursuant to a
Redevelopment Agreement with a Developer: (1) the payment of
SAC and of water connection charges for the Housing Facilities,
and the making of certain soil corrections, the conveyance to a
Developer of the Condominium Project Area, the Elderly Housing
Project Area and the Office Project Area the 1985 Project Area,
the construction or installation of the Park, the City Public
Improvements and HRA Public Improvement and other public
amenities all as provided for in the Redevelopment Agreement;
(2) the making of studies and planning and informational
activities relating to the 1985 Project; (3) the making of a
lump sum payment or periodic payments to pay interest on a loan
made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C or by a
private lender to a Developer to finance the costs of
construction and installation of the Condominium Development
and Elderly Housing Development; (4) the issuance of the Bonds
to finance the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project;
and (5) the use of the Tax Increment derived from the District
to pay the debt service on such Bonds, or otherwise pay the
Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project.
b. By a Developer: (1) the construction and
installation of the Private Improvement; (2) the performance of
such Redevelopment Activities on behalf of the City or the HRA
as may be required by the City or the HRA and specified in a
Redevelopment Agreement, subject to reimbursement of the cost
thereof by the City or the HRA from Tax Increments to be
derived from the District; (3) the payment and financing of the
cost of the Private Improvement; and (4) the operation of the
Private Improvements.
C. No contracts have been entered into for
Redevelopment Activities.
d. No development other than that described in this
Section 3 is presently proposed to take place in the 1985
Project Area.
B. Development of 1985 Protect Area.
1. Use. The property in the 1985 Project Area will
be redeveloped by the construction and installation of the
Park, the Private Improvements, the HRA Public Improvement and
the City Public Improvement.
2. Redevelopment Agreements. The property
1985 Project Area on which the Private Improvements
located will be sold by the HRA to a Developer for
redevelopment pursuant to one or more Redevelopment
under which, among other things, a Developer will be
to construct and install the Private Improvement by
-7-
in the
are to be
Agreements
required
a specified
date, the Private Improvements to have at least a specified
minimum number of square feet, a specified minimum cost and a
specified minimum Assessor's Market Value; to complete certain
percentages of the work by specified dates pursuant to plans
and specifications submitted to and building permits issued by
or on behalf of the City, and pursuant to and in accordance
with all other applicable governmental regulations; and to
demonstrate its financial capability for so doing.
Each Developer will also be required to enter into an
Assessment Agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
278.76, whereby it will agree to the minimum Assessor's Market
Value of the 1985 Project Area upon completion of the
construction and installation of the Private Improvement to be
located thereon and will agree not to take any action to
challenge or otherwise cause said Assessor's Market Value to be
reduced at any time while the Bonds remain outstanding.
In addition, if the HRA makes a periodic or lump sum
payment to pay interest on a loan made pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462C or a private lender to a Developer to
finance construction and installation of the Elderly Housing
Development, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 12, the HRA will obtain
an agreement which provides that upon the sale or transfer. by
the Developer of the 1985 Project Area, the HRA shall be paid
an amount to be determined under clause (b) of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 12, and the HRA will
provide that the obligation of the Developer to pay this amount
be secured by an interest of the HRA in the property. The
interest of the HRA in the property shall consist of either a
right of co- ownership or a lien or mortgage against the
property and may be subordinate to other interests in the
property.
If the HRA makes a periodic or lump sum payment to pay
interest made by a private lender to a developer to finance
construction and installation of the Condominium Development in
accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.445, subdivision 11, at least eighty (800) percent of the
aggregate dollars appropriated by the HRA for this purpose
shall be appropriated for units which are to be sold or
occupied by families or individuals with an adjusted gross
income which is equal to or less than one hundred ten (1100) of
the median family income and the HRA shall abtain an agreement
with the Developer evidencing the Developer's obligation to
comply with this requirement.
c. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have
to be relocated as a result of the 1985 Project.
WE
D. Interest Reduction Program. In connection with
the 1985 Project the HRA will undertake an Interest Reduction
Program under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision
10 to assist in the financing of the Condominium Development
and Elderly Housing Development both of which are intended
primarily for occupancy by individuals of low and moderate
income. In determining to proceed with an Interest Reduction
Program the HRA has considered (i) the availability and
affordability of other governmental programs, (ii) the
availability and affordability of private mortgage financing,
and (iii) the need for additional affordable mortgage credit to
encourage the construction and enable the purchase of housing
units within the jurisdiction of the HRA. The HRA will
promulgate regulations for the Interest Rate Rrduction Program.
III. FINANCING OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COST OF 1985 PROJECT
A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost.
1. Estimated Public Redevelopment Cost. The total
costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly
or indirectly, in carrying out the 1985 Project are estimated
to be as follows:
City Public Improvements to be paid
from Tax Increments $ 710,000
HRA Public Improvements 2,050,000
Park 6,700,000
Interest Reduction Program 4,185,000
Bond Issuance Costs, including
bond discount 250,000
Capitalized Interest on Bonds 2,100,000
HRA and City and Administrative Expenses. 500,000
Total Public Redevelopment
Cost of Project $16,495,000
The items of cost and the amounts thereof shown above are
estimated to be necessary based upon the best engineering,
legal and other information now available. It is anticipated
that the items of cost and the amounts thereof shown in each
category above may decrease or increase, but that the Public
Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project will not exceed the
amount shown above, plus interest to be paid on the Bonds
(other than out of proceeds of the Bonds). The City and the
HRA reserve the right to pay the cost of any element of the
Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project from the proceeds
of the Bonds herein authorized, or directly from Tax Increments
derived from the District.
2. Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project. The Capital
Proceeds of the 1985 Project, comprising the cash proceeds of
sale of property in the 1985 Project Area owned by the HRA to
the Developer, are expected to be negligible.
-9-
3. Public Redevelopment Cost. The Public
Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project, comprising the total
costs expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly
or indirectly, in carrying out the 1985 Project, less the
Capital Proceeds of the 1985 Project, is expected to be
$16,495,000, plus interest to be paid on the Bonds during their
term (other than out of the proceeds of the Bonds).
B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost of 1985
Project.
1. In General. The entire Public Redevelopment Cost
of the 1985 Project will be paid from Tax Increment to be
derived from the District, either directly or indirectly by
payment of debt service on Bonds issued to finance such cost or
reimbursement of the Developer for items of Public
Redevelopment Cost paid directly by the Developer, or by making
periodic or lump sum payments to pay interest on a loan made
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C to the Developer
to finance the construction and installation of the Condominium
Development and Eldely Housing Development, or by some
combination of the foregoing.
2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that
a portion of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the
Project will be financed by the issuance of the'Bonds in one or
more series in the principal amount of not greater than
$11,000,000. Certain Costs of the Interest Reduction Program
to be undertaken in connection with the 1985 Project are not
expected to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds and
will be paid directly from Tax Increment derived from the District
not needed to pay principal and interest on Bonds. The Bonds
will be issued by the City or the HRA under authority of
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78.
3. Bond Terms. The terms of the Bonds are expected
to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to
adjust any and all terms of the Bonds to secure the best
interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire
principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid when due
from the sources specified in paragraph 4.
The Bonds will be in the principal amount of not
greater than $11,000,000, will mature serially over a period of
approximately 20 years, commencing on or after February 1,
1987, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will
bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to
maturity, payable semiannually commencing in 1986, and will be
sold at public sale.
4. Security For And Payment Of Bonds. The Bonds will
be general obligations of the City or the HRA, and the full
faith and credit and the taxing powers of the City or the HRA
-10-
will be pledged for their payment. The principal of and
interest on the Bonds will be payable from the Tax Increments
to be derived from the District by the HRA and from ad valorem
taxes to be levied on all taxable property in the City, but if
necessary for the payment thereof, additional ad valorem taxes
will be required by law to be levied on all taxable property in
the City, which taxes will not be subject to any limitation as
to rate and amount.
IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF 1985 PROJECT
A. In General. The 1984 Project and this 1985
Amendment shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the
City Council and the HRA. The HRA or the City shall sell and
issue Bonds in the amount needed to finance the Public
Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project, less any portion
thereof to be paid directly from Tax Increment derived from the
District and shall use so much of the 1985 Tax Increment Bond
proceeds available and Tax Increment derived from the District
to pay such Public Redevelopment Cost as is necessary.
B. Cooperation Agreement. If necessary, the City and
the HRA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement for the
purpose of specifying the duties and responsibilities of each
with respect to the implementation of the 1985 Project and this
1985 Amendment, and the application of the Tax Increments to be
derived from the 1985 Project Area.
V. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO PLAN
The City and the HRA reserve the right to alter the
1985 Project and to further amend or modify the Plan by their
joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating
such action.
The City and the HRA specifically reserve the right to
increase the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1985 Project and
the amount of Bonds to be issued to finance such Public
Redevelopment Cost, if and when it is determined to be
necessary for the paying of additional Public Redevelopment
Costs.
VI. ORIGINAL PLAN
The Original Plan except to the extent the provisions
thereof are explicitly amended or supplemented by this 1985
Amendment shall remain in and be in full force and effect.
-11-
1W 13"'. ow=i
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 1985 PROJECT AREA.
A -1
EXHIBIT B
SITE PLAN
B -1
MA
AMENDMENT
THIS AMENDMENT, Made and entered into as of the
day of May, 1985, by _anti between. the Housing and.'
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ")
and the City of Edina, a municipal corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota
( "Edina ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the HRA and Edina entered into an Agreement
dated May 8, 1974 (the "Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, the HRA and Edina now desire to amend
the Agreement in the manner below set out.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth,
the HRA and Edina.do hereby agree as follows:
"1. The first sentence in Section 1, paragraph b.
of the Agreement is hereby changed to read as follows:
"The Executive Director shall be that person- in- eharge-
e €- tl�e- R�anning- Bepatx�er�t- a €- Ediaa- from time to time
appointed by the Director."
2. The- Agreement, as amended hereby, shall be
and remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year
first above written.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By:
Its Chairman
And.
Its Secretary
CITY OF EDINA
By.
Its Mayor
And:
Its Manager
- 2 -
Commissioner
introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING 1985 AMENDMENT TO
THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows:
1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously
approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes
a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax increment financing
plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district,
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision
9. It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments
to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "), which includes,
among other things, the establishment of an interest reduction
program under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.445, subdivision 11 (the "Interest Reduction Program ").
2. The 1985 Amendment is described in the document
entitled "1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1985
Amendment as so described is hereby approved, and the Executive
Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby
authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation
of the 1985 Amendment.
3. It is acknowledged that it is presently proposed
that a majority of the payments to be made by the HRA pursuant
to the Interest Reduction Program will be in the form of
periodic payments over a number of years and such payments
are hereby authorized to be made over such period.
Dated this 6th day of May, 1985.
Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was
duly seconded by Commissioner
and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested
by the Executive Director.
-2-
Commissioner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; APPROVING THE
SALE OF LAND AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows.:
1. The.HRA and the Edina City - Council have previously
approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting pursuant to
the Plan the HRA has acquired certain land in the area included
in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and
transfer a portion of such land to the East Edina-Housing
Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement
by and between the HRA and the Foundation (the "Agreement ").
A draft of the Agreement has been prepared and submitted
to the HRA and is hereby directed to be filed with the Executive
Director of the HRA.
2. On May 6, 1985, the HRA duly called and held
a public hearing on the sale and transfer of such land to
the Foundation pursuant to.the Agreement in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes., Section 462.525,. subdivision 2.
3. The form of the Agreement is.hereby approved
subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and i
approved by the attorney for the HRA and the Executive Director
of the HRA, which approval shall be conc1tisively evidenced
by the execution of the Agreement by the Chairman and Executive
Director of the HRA. The Chairman and Executive Director
of the HRA are directed to execute the Agreement upon execution
thereof by the Foundation. The Chairman and Executive Director
of.the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute such
other instruments as may be required to give effect to the
transaction herein contemplated.
Dated this 6th day of May, 1985.
Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Commissioner and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was.signed by the. Chairman and his signature attested
by the Executive Director.
�. .,
all
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Commissioner and
upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was.signed by the. Chairman and his signature attested
by the Executive Director.
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE
1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
City: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting,
held on May 6, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1985 AMENDMENT
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as
described above, have been carefully compared with the original
records of the City in my legal custody, from which they
have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct
and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the
City Council of the City, and is a correct and complete copy
of a resolution approved by the City Council at said meeting;
and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at
the time and place and was attended throughout by the members
indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting
given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this 6th day of May, 1985.
Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
Member
introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1985 AMENDMENT
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have
previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment
project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq.,
and a tax increment financing plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan
established a tax increment financing district, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9 (the
"District "). The HRA has approved amendments to the Plan
designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "), which include,
among other things, the establishment of an interest reduction
program under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.445, subdivision 11 (the "Interest Reduction Program ")
and has requested that this Council approve the 1985 Amendment.
This Council held a public hearing on the 1985 Amendment
on May 6, 1985, after notice of the public hearing was published
in The Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on
April 25, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be
heard on the subject were given an opportunity with respect
thereto.
2. Approval. The 1985 Amendment is hereby approved.
3. Findings Under the Municipal Housing and
Redevelopment Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.521, it is hereby found that:
(A) The land located within the 1985 Project Area,
as defined in the 1985 Amendment would not be made available
for redevelopment without financial aid sought;
(B) The redevelopment plans for the 1985 Project
Area as set forth in the 1985 Amendment will afford
maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs
of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the
1985 Project Area by private enterprise; and
(C) The 1985 Amendment conforms to the general
plan for the development of the City as a whole.
4. Interest Reduction Program. It is acknowledged
that it is presently proposed that a majority of the payments
to be made by the HRA pursuant to the Interest Reduction
Program will be in the form of periodic payments over a number
of years and the HRA is hereby authorized to make such payments
over such period.
Attest:
Passed by the Council this 6th day of May, 1985.
C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was
duly seconded by Member
and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by
the C-i-ty Clerk.
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
.City: City of Edina,. Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting:. A regular meeting,
held on May 6, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., at the City Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 and 2
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as
described above, have been carefully compared with the original
records of the City in my legal custody, from which they
have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct .
and complete transcript of the minutes.of a meeting of the
City Council of;the City, and is a correct and complete copy
of a resolution approved by the City.Council at said meeting;
and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at
the time and place and was attended throughout by the members
indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting
given as required by law.
.WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this ':6th, day of May., 1985.
Marcella Daehn; City Clerk
Member introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN;. AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows:
1. The Housing and Redevelopment-Authority of
Edina, Minnesota (the ".HRA ")` and the Edina, City Council have
previously approved -a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462..421,"subdivision 15, :designated as
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). Acting
pursuant to the Plan the`'HRA has acquired certain land in
the area included in the Plan and it has been proposed that
the HRA sell and transfer a portion of such land to the East
Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "), pursuant to
a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Agreement "). The Agreement provides for the execution
of a consent by the City (the "Consent "). A form of the
Consent is attached as an exhibit to the Agreement. A draft
of the Agreement has been prepared and submitted-to the City
and is hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk.
2. The form of the Consent is hereby.approved
subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and
approved by the city attorney and the City Manager, which
approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution
of the Consent by the Mayor and City Manager. The Mayor
and City Manager are directed to execute the Consent upon
execution of the Agreement by the HRA and the Foundation.
The.Mayor and City Manager are also authorized and directed
to execute such other instruments as may be required to give
effect to the transaction herein contemplated.
Attest:
Dated this 6th day.of May, 1985.
City Clerk
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member , and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by
the City Clerk.
-2-
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
APRIL 1, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MINUTES of March 18, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly,
seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
.Motion carried.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Member
Turner, seconded by Member Kelly. Moti
Executive Director
5 -3 -85
TO:
EDINA CITY
COUNCIL AND HRA COMMISSIONERS
.MEMBERS OF
EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION (N.P.C.)
RE:
VILLAGES IN
EDINA (formerly Edinborough)
I. PLAN AND CONCEPT
A.
RESIDENTIAL: 1.
392 condos, 7 phases at 56 units per phase.
2.
80% moderate income buyers. Income Range $19,000 - $36,000.
3.
Edina preference.
4.
Underground parking.
B.
OFFICE: 1.
Two buildings, two phases, 205,000 square feet
(107,000 square feet in Phase I and 98,000 square
feet in Phase II), some retail.
2.
Surface and one level ramp parking (some for park use).
C.
ELDERLY: 1.
202 units, 18 stories, rental.
2.
20% low and moderate income.
3.
Edina preference.
4.
Restaurants for residents and for public.
5.
Surface and underground parking.
6.
Day care.
D.
PUBLIC PARK: 1.
Approximately one acre covered; pool; running
track; catering kitchen, performing amphitheatre.
2.
Large meetings, e.g., Edinamite, Centennial events.
3.
Heavily programmed; some user fees.
II. PHASING OF CONSTRUCTION
First: 1.
107,000 square feet of office.
2.
56 residential condos.
3.
Park, utilities, parking (underground and surface and ramp).
4.
Elderly.
5.
Start 30 days; close and finish 24 months.
Office 1. 98,000 square feet of office.
Pfia II:
2. Start approximately three years after the start
of the first phase.
Second throu h 1. 56 residential per phase.
Seventh on o-
minium Phase: 2. Start second phase not later than two years after
start of first phase; start later phases approxi-
mately one year apart.
The agreements (See VIII below) provide for sale and development of Phase
I and give options to the Redeveloper to develop later phases. However, as to
the condominiums, some aspects of later phases must be negotiated by the HRA,
the Foundation and the Redeveloper before those phases can proceed.
III. CONSTRUCTION
A. Publicly bid all public improvements.
B. Construction coordinator and manager for all public and private improvements -
especially important as all of Phase I built simultaneously and office, elderly
and park are physically tied. Hired by HRA and Redevelopers.
C. Public Improvements:
City: 1. Streets and utilities (paid by assessment).
HRA: 2. Grading, park, parking for park (including a one -level
parking ramp on Office Site), public walkways and court-
yards, some utilities. (Paid by tax increment)
IV. FINA!'t' INS
A. OFFICE: 1. No public subsidy. Land pur&,_zse price to help
residential buyers.
2. Public improvements assessed.
3. Land paid for at cost to HRA, plus all deferred taxes,
plus interest.
4. Tax assessment agreement.
B. ELDERLY: 1. $17,000,000 Housing Revenue Bonds. Repaid by owners
of development.
-2-
C. RESIDENTIAL:
2. Interest reduction payment by the HRA of a maxi-
mum of $170,000 per year for each of 20 years.
Assists all elderly, especially low and moderate 20 %.
Payments are non - recourse, except that they will be
guaranteed up to $50,000 per year and $500,000 maxi-
mum, by principals of Developer, to extent payments
are from other than tax increments. 121% interest.
To be repaid upon refinance,sale, or, if not sold, in
installments from the 20th to the 40th year.
HRA to be given a second mortgage on Elderly site
to secure repayment.
3. Land paid for at cost to the HRA, plus all deferred
taxes, plus interest.
4. City improvements assessed; HRA improvements to be
paid for at closing.
5. To be syndicated to a limited partnership.
1. HRA to pay for land assessments for City improvements,
and its own improvements on the residential site. HRA
also agrees to pay construction period interest, up to
$2,000 per unit, for condominium units.
2. All HRA payments and contributions will go into a pool.
Part of the pool will go to reduce overall sales prices
of units, and part will be used to fund second mortgages
(at 5 interest) to the Foundation, repayable only upon
sale of the unit. Second mortgages are only for low and
moderate income buyers.
3. Example of use of pool money:
(a) Unit Cost
(b) Writedown
(c) Sales price
(d) Down payment
(e) First mortgage
(f) Slow 2nd mortgage (from N.P.C.)
1XII
$85,000
(11,600)
73,400
3,700
70,000±
50,000
20,000
(a), (e) and (f) are all variable based on
applicants income and size of unit.
Money from second mortgage comes back to NPC for
future use on project and, at end of project,
throughout Edina. So- called Geri (Geriatric) plan.
4. Mn. Housing Finance Agency has already approved
$2,000,000 for first mortgages. Due to time limits this
has been released. A new application will be made.
D. PARK 1. Construction - paid from tax increment.
2. Maintenance (no city money anticipated); Paid monthly.
Elderly $15 per unit per month $ 36,000 /yr.
Residential $ 5 per unit per month $ 23,500/6r.
Office $.21 per sq. ft. per year $ 42,500/ r.
102,000/ yr.
All tied to price index for increase. No decrease.
User fees:
Pool, track - some exceptions for residents
of elderly over 62.
V. TAX INCREMENT
The projected increments have been reviewed for us by Coopers- Lybrand and appear
favorable, even if only first phase built.
VI. DEVELOPER AND PROJECT CONTRIBUTIONS
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
$920,000 Park Dedication - paid by HRA to City.
$ 50,000 Paid to Foundation by Developer.
$200,000 Initial payment for Phase I - paid by Developer to
City (will total $335,000 if all phases built).
$102,000 Park Maintenance - per year when all phases built.
$975,500 To Foundation from Developer for Office Phase I, and
Elderly land.
VII. EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION
(A Minnesota Non - Profit Corporation
Section 501 (c) (3) status with IRS applied for)
5. members, 2 City appointed, 3 HRA appointed.
-4-
A substantial reserve is expected to develop and may
be used for housing in other areas of Edina.
VIII. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
A. HRA and East Edina Housing Foundation ( the "HRA Contract ")
I. Phase I conveyed to Foundation.
2. Foundation commits to build the private improvements pursuant to
approved plans.
3. HRA commits to build the HRA improvements pursuant to public
bids, approved plans and with a guaranteed maximum cost.
4. City construct Public improvements pursuant to assessment procedure.
5. All construction plans, surveys, etc, are conditionally assigned
to the HRA as security.
6. Payment and performance bonds required only to extent required
by a first mortgage lender.
7. Private improvements to be fully insured by the developer; proceeds
to be used to rebuild damaged improvements. Rebuilding requirements
to continue until bonds are paid, except that reconstruction of
condominiums to be controlled by state condominium law.
8. No assignments or transfers allowed without HRA approval except for
leases in the normal course of business and sales of condominium
units in the normal course of business. Also the Office and Elderly
developments may be syndicated. If syndicated, the Developer, or
principals approved by the HRA, must own at least 500/', of the general
partnership interest and be the managing general partner.
9. If the Developer defaults, the HRA, among oth remedies, may suspend
its performance, withhold Certificates of CoT :letion, and cancel and
rescind the Agreement.
10. The Developer must comply with applicable laws as to non - discrimination,
hours and wages.
11. The Agreement is terminable by either side if by December 31, 1985:
(a) Housing revenue bonds are not issued;
(b) tax increment bonds are not issued;
(c) construction plans are not approved;
(d) zoning or platting is not approved;
-5-
(e) closing contingencies are not removed;
(f) financing is not obtained; or
(g) title to the real estate is not marketable.
12. The Developer can exercise options for later phases of develop-
ment if there is no default in the Agreement, and if various
contingencies applicable to each phase are removed. The options
are exercisable as follows:
Office Phase II - within 36 months of the closing of
Phase I;
Condominium Phase II - within 24 months of the closing
of Phase I;
Condominium Phases III through VII - the option for Phase
III must be exercised within 36 months of the closing of
Phase I, and each subsequent phase option must be exercised
within each period of 12 consecutive months thereafter.
B, EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION AND THE EDINA PARTNERSHIP.
1. The Edina Partnership is comprised of:
(a) York Edina Partnership, a general partnership comprised of
Winfield Development, Inc., Laukka, Inc., and Jarvis, Inc.;
(b) Henry Hyatt, Sheldon Baskin and Daniel Epstein; and
(c) Thomas W. LaSalle.
2. The Edina Partnership cannot assign its rights without permission.
Permission is given to assign its rights and obligations under
the Acreement as follows:
(a) The Elderly Housing Development to Partners for Senior
Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation;
(b) The Office Developments to the Edina Office Limited Partner-
ships I and II, a Minnesota limited partnership;
(c) The Condominium Developments to the Edina Townhouse Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership.
3. The Edina Partnership, and when assigned, the other developers,
assume and agree to perform all of the obligations of the Foundation
under the Agreement with the HRA. (All have been examined by
Mr. Van Valkenburg for creditworthiness and reputation, and are
recommended as developers.).
ffffl
4. Each development stands on its own as to defaults and
performance once assigned to the separate developers.
5. Defaults and remedies are essentially the same as in the
HRA Contract.
6. Termination dates and events are essentially the same as in the
HRA Contract.
7. The Developers can exercise their options for future phases pur-
suant to the HRA Contract, except that for the condominiums
additional negotiations and agreements are required as to amount
of pool available, amount of writedown, unit costs and similar
matters.
8. Condominium Development:
(a) 80% of the units must be sold to buyers with adjusted gross
income equal to or less than 110 of Median Family Income
established by HUD for the Metropolitan Area. At present
the Median Income is $32,800. (36,100 = 110 %).
(b) The HRA determines the qualifying income parameters.
(c) Price of units, write down from cost (provided with HRA funds),
and the amount of second mortgages will be determined and agreed
upon on a phase by phase basis. If NPC and Developer cannot
agree, the NPC need not sell that phase.
IX. OTHER AGREEMENTS
A. Joint Easement Agreement.
B. Assessment Agreement (Developers agree not to contest taxes to reduce below
agreed upon amount until bonds are paid).
C. Construction Management Agreement (for coordination of all private and public
work; commitment to HRA that its improvements shall not exceed a stated
maximum cost).
D. Tax Increment Shortfall Guaranty (only for the interest reduction payments for
the elderly; only for maximum of $50,000 per year and $500,000 aggregate).
E. Joint Management Agreement (for operation of park and public and private
improvements on the site).
F. Origination and Servicing Agreement (with a bank, mortgage banker or like
entity to help plan and service the NPC second mortgages).
G. Construction Period Interest Agreement (HRA agrees to pay construction period
interest on condominium units up to $2,000 per unit).
d2
H. Interest Reduction Agreement (for the Elderly development).
X. OFFICE PARKING RAMP
HRA will build upper level of ramp, have rights to use that level and
access to it; office developer will maintain ramp without cost to HRA or
City.
M
LOCATION MAP T-4
73,
UM
70 T N 3T_
CO
RNELIjAk;
-ELEk. SCH
ROL
PARK, LUTHERAN
CHUFWL
-FTH,
110 Ire OE
J MASTER.
z
ST
..A
Z_
1vff
4_1
IT[
LOT.DiVISION
NUMBER LD-85-3
L 0 C A T 10 N 7019-7021 Lynmar Lane
Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
u
7�
..... .....
73,
UM
70 T N 3T_
CO
RNELIjAk;
-ELEk. SCH
ROL
PARK, LUTHERAN
CHUFWL
-FTH,
110 Ire OE
J MASTER.
z
ST
..A
Z_
1vff
4_1
IT[
LOT.DiVISION
NUMBER LD-85-3
L 0 C A T 10 N 7019-7021 Lynmar Lane
Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
• j
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 1, 1985
LD -85 -3 7019 -7021 Lynmar Lane
Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor
Generally located: East of Lynmar Lane and North of Mavelle
Drive.
Refer to: Attached survey
The proponents are request a party -wall division of an
existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are
provided. A non - conforming three -car garage is located on
the southerly portion of the site.
Recommendation:
The proposed split satisfies all conditions for a party -wall
subdivision established in the Zoning Ordinance. However,
since all the garages will be located on one lot, garage
access easements will be needed. Staff recommends approval
of the division.
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343
CIRTIFICATE OF SUR
Survey For:
Book Page
NORTH
LANDSURVEYORS
W
Z
J
0
z
J
121 145
3o.Zo f,n
I�
I�
5v. 40
Duplex
# -1O10E)
m
//75
N
PrO�cao 3eG �..� ✓is�0r7 Line -�
U\
1�
L
So. 4.0
11�
t�
nGarcxee 0
N
N
m
5.1
M
tr
I hereby certify that this it a Irw and caned rearesentation of a survey of the boundaries of
1 �� — _' `' Tr''' ^,r Hennepin Covnty, Minnesota and of the iccation of all buildings thereon, and all
.iubla encroacfimeny, if ony, Iron or on said load. 5vrnyed by the this , r n day of I,/C V — r y ". �"-' t�- e , 19 7.
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Q
FGttl=)l rUK VUKl.,-1AJt
W.- Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
.IA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 2, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Two full activated Traffic Control Signal Systems
Turn Lane Construction Metro Blvd. at W. 70th & Metra Blvd. at Edina Industrial Blvd.
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. See attached Tabulation
2.
Department Recommendation: Ridgedale Electric $137,190.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is / is not
Public Works- Engineering
Signatu Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
. P1.
en, finance Director
City 1- t3fianer's Endorsement:
4/ 1. I concur with the reconynendation of the Department and reconunend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: �.
.enneth R stand, City 1.1 eager
� I
BID TABULATION
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT #85 -2 (ENG)
TWO FULL ACTIVATED TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS
TURN LANE CONSTRUCTION - P.C.C. ISLANDS
METRO BLVD. AND EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
METRO BLVD. AND WEST 70TH STREET
BID OPENI14G - THURSDAY, MAY 2, 1985
BIDDER TOTAL
$137 190.00
t rs Inc. $141,340.00
$154,201.00
Hoffman Flprtric $154,662.75
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE:i�a Gnn nn
RT?Q0T.1TTT0N
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested 'the.subdivision of said tract into:separate
parcels.(herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
The North 47.3 feet, front and rear of Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor
Addition; and
Lot 6_, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, except the North 47.3 feet, :.:....._:
front and rear, of said Lot 6;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivison and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
.of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 198.4`.
STATE OF.MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS .
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that -the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular. Meeting of May 6, 1985, and as
recorded in the.Minutes.of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1985.
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR PURC! VISE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer
.IA: Kenneth Rosland, City Nanaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 2, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Contract #85 -3 - School Parking'Lots - Arthur Street - W.. 492 Street
Contract #85 -4 - Arneson Park - Playground Rings
Quotations /Bids:
, 3
C-
Com any Amount of Quote or Bid
1. See attached tabulation
2.
Department Recommendation: Bury &.Carlson., Inc. - (85 -3) - $138,607.68
Gunderson Bros. - 85 -4 - $ 34,366.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not
y, Public Works & Parks
Si ture Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N, Dalen, Finance Director
City Ma a"ner's Endorsement:
1.
I concur with the reconrnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: /)
nneth'Rosland, Ci? Manager
r
TABULATION OF BIDS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT #85 -3 AND #85 -4 (ENG)
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, PARKING LOTS SURFACING, PLAYGROUND RINGS AND SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT NO.'S - BA -263, P -14, P -15 &
VARIOUS PARK PROJECTS
BID OPENING - THURSDAY, MAY 2, 1985 - 11:00 A.M.
BIDDER
CONTRACT #85 -3
CONTRACT #85 -4
Bury &.Carlson, Inc.
* ** $138,607.68
$42,618.80
Hardrives, Inc.
$151,466.35
---- - - - - --
Midwest Asphalt Corporation
$154,998.78
$57,796.50
Gunderson Bros.
----- - - - - --
* ** $34,366.00
Standard Sidewalk
----- - - - - --
$41,502.50
Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc.
----- - - - - --
$46,395.70
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
$131,227.50
$33,255.00
hLQUL31 1 -0I i'iii(uflt1 -)L
TO:" Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gordon Hughes
.A: Kenneth Ros1and, City Hanaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 6, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Weed harvesting of Mill Pond
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1• Midwest Aqua Care
2. NO OTHER BIDDERS
3.
=.-,o
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$9,120.00
Department Recommendation: MIDWEST AQUA-CARE
A
• Si:gn to Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
t .
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. Da en, Finance Director
CitA�Maqer's Endorsement:
. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nneth posland, Cit l-lanager
TO:" Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gordon Hughes
!A: Kenneth Rosland, City tlanarer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 6, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Weed harvesting of Mirror Lake
Quotations /Bids:
Com any
1. Midwest Aqua Care
2. NO OTHER BIDDERS
3.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$4,930.00
Department Recommendation: MIDWEST AQUA CARE
Signa u epartment
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City M ager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
0 . I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR FURCHAI L
7_��
r_ s�
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Wallin, Assistant Finance Director
AA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE:
May 6, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1984 Chev Citation II, 4 door Hatchback
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
j. Iten Chevrolet, Brooklyn Center 8,194.00
2.. Harold Chevrolet, Bloomington 8,584.00
12, Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet, Buick 9,210.00
Department Recommendation: Iten Chevrolet for 8,194.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not
Finance
Signature Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
C
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Ma ner's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
�F
TO: Mayor and City Council
7ROM: Roger Laurence
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 5/2/85
Material Description (General Specifications):
Fire Department radio base station, antenna, feed line, filter, mini control console,
and desk remote.
Quotations/Bids-
Company
1. General Communications, Inc.
2. Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.
Amount of Quote or Bid
-
$ 12,247.00
$ 12,428.00
Department Recommendation: Both proposers have met the terms, conditions, and technical
specifications detailed in the request for quotations. Therefore, it is recommended that
the City accept the low quote provided by General Communications, Inc.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
Sionature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bird is .✓ is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
I
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Wager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nne'th Ros I and, (:I ty Manager
f �
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: February 27, 1985
TO: William Feck, Fire Chief _
Roger Laurence, Edina Police ti\
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Assistant Chief \�
SUBJECT: Radio "Down Time" - Fire Base Station
- -- February 20, 1985 - During lightning activity in our area, and
at approximately 1930 hours, we lost operation of our main base
radio. V
We transferred operations to the back -up unit (base), and remained
operational.
- -- February 21, 1985 - At approximately 0930 hours, General Communications
arrived to repair base radio (main). At 1113 hours, General Communica-
tions took the main base to their shop for repairs.
During this period (2 -21 -85 @ 1113 hours to 2 -22 -85 @ 0910 hours), we
were without main base communications.
General Communications called the afternoon of 2 -21 -85 to advise the
base radio was repaired and that they were keeping it overnight to
monitor its operation and would return it to us by 2 -22 -85 @ 0900 hrs.
- -- February 21, 1985 - (approximately 1700 hours) Police /Fire back -up
radio was not transmitting properly, and we were without radio alert/
paging ability until 0910 hours on 2- 22 -85.
- -- During the period of 22 hours, we had 17 emergency calls.
- -- February 22, 1985 (0910 hours) - General Communications reinstalled
main base. Back -up remains out of service due to non - avail.ability
of parts.
- -- February 22, 1985 - (approximately 1500 hours) - Roger Laurence
installed a make -shift back -up unit, using a police field radio.
TRP /ras
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE_
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ceil Smith
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE11 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 6, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Public Officials Liability Insurance
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Markel Service, Inc. $6,600.00
2. O'Rourke - Ossanna Agency $9,000.00
1.
Department Recommendation: MARKEL SERVICE, INC.
S i q n1 t e Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
Cl
1�) h 9zd�--�
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Ma per's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase. ^
2. I recommend as an alternative: �1 4
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
'ROM: Ceil Smith
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE11 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 6, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Police Professional Insurance
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Markel Service, Inc.
(SEE ATTACHED)
2.
Department Recommendation: MARKEL SERVICE, INC. .
Amount of Quote or Bid
$15,150.00
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is s not within the amount budget for the P urchase.
I� K �
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City aaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
_ 2. I recommend as an alternative: ,
nneth Rdsland, City Map'ager
M E M O R A N D U M i.
TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: POLICE PROFESSIONAL INSURANCE Ete—'
DATE: May 6, 1985
We have gone out and sought bids for our Police Professional Insurance.
The Police are currently covered under our General Liability Insurance
with the Home Insurance Company. As of May 24, 1985, Home Insurance
intends to discontinue that coverage.
In an effort to find premiums that were reasonable for both the Police
and the Public Officials Liability, it was necessary to quote both
coverages together. The Markel Service was willing to write the Public
Officials Liability as long as they could'also write the Police Professional
Liability. Other companies that were solicited to submit bids did not
want to write Public Officials Liability, or those who did quoted prices
that were much higher than the premium quote we received from the Markel
Service.
Because of the difficulty in acquiring the Public Officials Liability,
staff is recommending that we go forward with the quote with the Markel
Service for the Police Professional Liability Insurance also.
KR /sw
0
V�' -- - �\
AkOMEDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
April 26, 1985
Dear Resident:
The Edina City Council on Monday, May 6, 1985 will consider releasing
the property on the southwest corner of Lynn Avenue and Littel Street
as a drainage easement and return the property to the State of Minnesota.
A request has been made that the council consider releasing the lot
(attached sketch).
The purpose of this notice is to alert the residents near the lot that
the State will probably put.the property up for sale to a private party
if the council releases the lot. This will result in putting this
property back on the tax rolls.
The City is required to return the lot for private sale unless it
determines that the lot should be kept for open space. Then, the City
can request a change in classification which may or not be approved
by State officials. .
If you have any further questions, contact me at 927 -8861.
Sincerely,
Francis J. �O)ffmfop.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH:1m
Enclosure: Sketch of lot
SEGO.
•400
a -
c Scale feet
.�L9 `99- y a 42
�. SiT-
"V
79
�• �y3� IZ2' 100 200 , 2ao
a 5o do 126 I I 1
z Z 1
`t `, �Iot W OD A o(�I 2s (g� (k� 1 2 0 51 2s (b1 l
N � � 28 > ` s �z4� Gy OD 1 Ce�� I I Ck�,l I I (Apl
27 4— r {'Jj1 2T i 4 �Y '— 7
5 26 _5— : W `� 26 \�1 53i , ,p9 — —24 (45) 3 24
kk
2 6
ap7 T , 24 . (�L�i ? `^ Ck°�4 11(n�, a = - 2
( 3
- -23_ a ( \��• Sl q � 3(%x%
�b1� — — —
uj
ytil 2 2 9 'b 22 9 1�1: %O 5 �11� 11 O g 22
10 21 s o lOj ,�:4 60(o 6 .S% 4(`127 x , - - - 1- - - - -
i _moo— (4, tis 20 e-
12 (.
4 _____ _ __ _
//ee
qSl 3 Q �3 18 s MAR' IELD ' T t n(II 5( \ \�� 21 hV� 7 6 --21-
r
}—
is IT _a a �bj �1°$8 Q •� S�v(11�s�o.�
Ne `I o� - -20—
o t1 v
.moo � ° 2\.. 16 • � � l�5 rlo� Y �t — _20_ _ — T
. B 421
-P�
P z
S:
x•6.3
LITTLE
-19dis - o
— s 4 (1
18 (qA� C�� 9
5 . 18 I) -- 9 - -L T - -18—
W_- - - -1 Cyst (•
-- �
6 - - -- 10
o (qs� 1; .3 (�m� 10 _ - -1T (Gq� (S6) 1O w T - -IT —,
•8 - 8 7 w-r -- V • -(-
--9 16`(7 I6 (�' (�1 11'
15 3 a , : - ���� J :.. .
ps4t ~ 12�15(g5� —�- 12-1- - -IS —'
3 13 1 13 (to? C _ _ 14 (
yq _ 1.9 o. 14/ �� �ql� i J3 -` !� 14 1�� i -�`� 2001
' `lq i 120 40 0
/ I It .'� 4d g19,�L3 B 2D0 20 200 W.by ,WiiA .
MORNINGSIDE
•
., .,- K 2 �, too :1 I • .
Li
Rt �r
2,6
200-.. _ - 0 = 20 400
Q feet
scale d
f• �yh1 It2� 20,
--ST
zoo
,{ ;
2s 1 I 2
1 :.' s. a lttdl Ij0 NW 2$ ,t � (g� (2 1 Zs 0 25 k 2 0 0 128 _ 1 , o I � I �� I l �27 a k3\ 27 N _ OD ' l
Cy 2s 5_ _ w C� Zs (\�l s _ d3' III ;r1 ' i X09 —24
�� ��Sl 3 — - — 2a
2 s _: a 1a 2s ,rj. o \
( \0'1 _
q07 7 24 • (1�� ? (kA - 11 . 1 2 — — _ -- — — a — — 23 r`
��►23 . X47 a - -23— -R
5ti122 9 'L 22 9 \�1. �osi 5 l�l� "� (\ 787 t��7� 5 2
21 p3 10 , 21 t , ! 9.-. 4 w 22 ( : Q
Pzo ..1 (� s S! e \\ Q
to kSl 12 3 (�+ 19 MAR' ELO (� T g
1 a 1 14 O (f%' 17 A
z 1 ze15� 4o dCZ\rzd16 : .'sa3. - 130 �.. y �-�, _20_ — — �7 `Z1� —20-
421/2 ST vwo ,, LITTLE .gT (`l �5 (.
rat t �t.:. - L a i 1 e 40 a JUVg
�zcR `A to 2 0 l
p P
N
z6 r sy l C 7 r - -18—
1 12
G 19 .
S 4 , 18 Cq ��� 18 S `3
+ Z15. w - - -- • Cy
�20 i — -Il p z 5
0 s � - - -- 10 -
- + - -17-
o. t. 1O (A 1; 3 �11 10 _ —17- .4 (S61 to -
°(\ w
1� I.z
X23 _ 0 8 8 &) Z
✓ -25' 7 5d 75 G 1 10 l6 (� J
26 'y 1 g Q 0) (6) `S0�
27 h [.1 1•- - 15 S� - -12 - - ---15
` �yo s4 ~0 12
c j 13 14 4
q2� ao �� I Q
z o 200 �°(� o
s: Co 6(, t it 4a glgtz9 •� 2DO 6r nor:.
3�.�3i o - ' ' • (� 4 4 MORNINGSIDE ,
�o I ff•
�
14t. .1 r• . 'oo •i la� i� l`
ca _ 2 :s1 A''lilryl �
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
Council:
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park V 5
property.
Signature Add_ Tess
C
CL c-42 -&_. da • `
\�
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
Council:
l. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
SY nature
�xAm�I /K�AV� W2 � '� �
AA
' Address
\ 6
l -,7
IA
-
—
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Council:
�C
I
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
Signature
Address
y2
6-� -�
y2
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Llttel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
[omncYl:
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
l. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
Signature
ytj
Address
*7 -
`
C� U
Z
�
/\ W '
~ (-
v
/
A `..
'
/
ut
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Council:
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
Sign_atWe
z iz,/z
r
J) cent
Q
G
Address
T q Cr (Pv, 'p) 14— ' /
Y Z a 5 Qt( mcs /-- . f
Uzi 3
3
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Council:
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
Signature
/W)A4
J
"Address
�,2 -V�- zz-f-�
n
`f�3� Crocks -�
Z�:
, �,�( U e,rC�� /Ivy
/yvIII
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
Council:
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
prop y-
v a��
��rol
Signature
" Address
4�)45 �C,2
Don iOTA�
Lj
X233
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
Council:
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
012
E
.Address
Ll
-)(C X�c
%r
ki 4 L+ o 1-;�r
/ IiL
J J ll
\ �f3 0��� ► 121
0
We, the undersigned, desire that the property located
on the South side of Littel Street in the City of Edina be
maintained in its present natural state.
Council:
Therefore, we respectfully request that the Edina City
1. Deny permission for any development of this property,
part of which is designated for Land Use purposes as
"Quasi Public;" and
2. Maintain the property as open space, or alternatively
consider dedication of the area as undeveloped park
property.
Signature
f
' 1
Orj zkl, lq 1(5
Address
(wse . 5-o .
y z 3 ` ,cykA L.ISV
yzz7d
AM ave.
So,
ya 33 Lr�►.,►ti a A, f . �O . 1' X-- -
ilZ ;3 Z L /I/1-e �o .
x-20 I Gnu
A,e- . -ra
CJ [
Iz
-- -- - -- - - - - - -- -- ---------------------
`f-i"-7 -k./ 64?n-d
-Bit 101: a__
A
4 � �&I- -4 -'4- --- ! . - 4 vc-_ -
V9AIJ AJOWL 4U-E -
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Village of Morningside (by annexation now City of Edina)
on August 6, 1943 received a conveyance of tax forfeited lands from the
State of Minnesota, conveying to it for drainage purposes a tract of land
described as follows:
Lot eight (8), Block three (3), Crocker and Crowell's First Addition
to the Village of Morningside; and
WHEREAS, the above described property is no longer needed for drainage
purposes but is desired by the City for open space purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of
Taxation, to change the use of the land above described from drainage
purposes to open space purposes.
ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of: May 6, 1985,: and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 13th day of June,..1985.
City Clerk
R F. R(1T.TTT T0X
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided plans and specifications for the improve-
ment of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 and
seeks the approval thereof; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed improvement Hennepin County has agreed
to construct a guard rail adjacent to the Murphy and Stang homes; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to purchase from the City any right of way
if needed for the proposed project and to provide $3,000 for use for City
roadways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans for the improvement of the ramp
from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 be and are hereby
approved, subject to an exchange of easements between the City and Hennepin
County as necessary.
ADOPTED this 6th day of May, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 6, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 11th day of December, 1985.
City Clerk
i6DINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, there currently exists in.the area of France Avenue
and Interstate Highway 494 traffic congestion at peak hours; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Homart office - hotel development is to be
developed on the Edina side of 494; and
WHEREAS, the Homart development would be three times as intense
as a similar development in.Edina; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development would negatively impact people
living and working in the City of Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE -IT RESOLVED that the Community Development and
Planning Commission recommends to the.City Council that all
appropriate steps be taken to.effect a reduction in the intensity
of this.proposed development.
�IEF
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS
DATE: May 6, 1985
The renewals for the various insurance coverages (with the exception of
Public Officials Liability -and Police Professional Liability) will be
due July 1, 1985. I am bringing this to your attention now in order to
let you know that it appears that our premiums are going to be going up
dramatically.
Briefly, the way we have been purchasing insurance over the past eight
years or so is as follows:
Every three years staff would develop specifications and take bids
for the various coverages. The last year we took bids was in 1983.
Under this practice, the various agents were awarded the bids for
three years with the provision that if the City is not satisfied
with the premium the agents are able to provide, the City has the
option to seek quotations for premiums on its own. It has been our
experience that the agents have always been able to provide very good
rates and in the most recent years, outstanding rates. (See attached;
the premiums indicated are net, and dividends have been subtracted from
the amounts shown.)
This year, we are going to experience some major changes in the premiums
the City is going to have to pay. The key reason for this turn of events
is primarily due to a total economic upheaval in the insurance industry,
due to lower interest rates and that dramatic rise in the cost of reinsurance.
At the time of higher interest rates, insurance companies were able to
subsidize their premiums with the returns on their investments. During
that period, companies became very competitive with their premiums.
Insurance companies now in an effort to protect their reserves are raising
the premiums, or are not taking on new accounts, and in some cases are
dropping various coverages altogether.
Staff has been working on our renewals since the end of February. They
are coming to the conclusion that we can expect most of our premiums to
return to the rates similar to those in 1979 (see attached). In other
words, we expect that at a minimum, premiums will double and in some
instances triple.
May 6, 1985
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
On a more positive note, our experience record in regard to most of our
coverage is excellent, and this will hopefully work in our favor in
acquiring the most favorable rates possible. I will keep you updated
as information is available.
KR /sw
General Liability
Liquor Liability
SUBTOTAL /Liability
Workers Compensation
Auto Liability
---------------- - - - - --
Property
Voting Machines
Fine Arts
Money & Securities
Mobile Equipment
SUBTOTAL /Property
Ambulance Malpractice
Boiler Machinery
Umbrella
e
1979 -80
106,109
143,723
24,390
-------- - - - - --
20,455
549
1,400
(See Liability)
22,404
(27,000)*
1,125
4,677
41,200
(3M)
INSURANCE PREMIUM PERFORMANCE
1979 -1985 (est.) NET PAID
1980 -81
1981 -82
1982 -83
-
-
53,498
-
-
15,382
57,747
74,592
68,880
164,549
159,606
156,702
11,707
---------------------------------------------------------
14,110
14,198
13,954
15,763
16,378
549
247
247
-
8
8
1,134
1,134
1,134
(See Liability)
(See Liability)
(See Liability)
15,637
17,152
17,787
(20,600)*
(22,150)*
(22,800)*
900
900
900
4,500
4,500
4,500
19,271
12,075
12,075
(3M)
(3M)
(3M)
*APPROXIMATE PROPERTY SUBTOTAL IF MOBILE EQUIPMENT INCLUDED.
1983 -84
35,153
6,512
41,665
81,500
11,954
9,541
247
1,298
2,096
13,190
900
4,540
6,000
(5M)
Revised
8/01/84
1984 -85 est.
37,965
6,512
44,477
105,443(est
13,000
13,794
266
6
1,301
2,096
17,463
900
4,600
7,500
(5M)
J 1985 -fTY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -Db-85 PAGE 1
CHECK-- N0.._,pATE
— AB OU-IyT
v =NDOct
TTFm OESCRTPTIoN
n.C.C- WA- NO "N- VA- "- .D"-MF-SSAG
-
I'
I;
123502
04/24/85
167.76
SUBURBWN CHEVROLET
PARTS
10-4620-560-56
,
�,
- -- - -- - --
_ - -_—
- -- 16!+76
•
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
I <_
.iG�
•*fr :•
18 +
*** —CKS
•ffrrr
—•
1260U3—
04/23/85
16.35
ALBINSON
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 260 -26
126017
B
528.60
126003
04/23185
10.25
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
10 -4570- 260 -26
04/22/85
14�p7.p20
'� 1
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
•
12
I' 126004 0.5/01/85 7095 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52
',-
- -• - - -- ---
_----------- ---
- -- _7.•95_!
�_
I,a
sn
* ** —CKS 5�
rrfrrf
126U26
04/30/85
19348.36
BADGER METER INC
WATER METERS
10
**+ —CKS
o
I"
12600/
0.510.1./85
22.00
APEX PEIST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
— —
l
22.30
+
'.
j24
126008
U4/22/85
10307
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
70
12600.8
04/22/85
117.53
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
P-
12 60 28
04/23/85
216.35
BEER VH�OIcSALERS
INVENTORY
27 -4630- 664 -66
216.35 *
126309
05/01/E5
47968
ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
126029
47
+
BERG & FARNHAM CO
II,
J
t'j
258.70 *
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301.30
71
!2
I4 -I
• +•f••
•
* '
,4 CKS • —
�„
3'
*•• —CKS 13:.
..1260.33 - -.. __.
-04/ 241.85__-
116012
04/23/85
24.95
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
24.95 *
3
126013
04/24/85
131.04
ALTEIRAT02 REBUILD
GEM SUPPLIES
°10- 4504 - 328 -30
126013
0.4/24/85
53.86
ALTEINAITOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
I <_
18 +
•ffrrr
—•
41
*f* —CKS <;
126017
04/22/85
528.60
ALLIED PL4STICS
GEM SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
I<i;
:I I
126717
04/22/85
14�p7.p20
ALLIED PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
f•f f.f
sn
* ** —CKS 5�
126U26
04/30/85
19348.36
BADGER METER INC
WATER METERS
40 -1220- 000 -00
h
I"
126026
04/23185
251.72
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 807 -80
I
*•+ -CKS 6J
�1.
P-
12 60 28
04/23/85
216.35
BEER VH�OIcSALERS
INVENTORY
27 -4630- 664 -66
216.35 *
ar•
a7
-
126029
04/22/85
258970
BERG & FARNHAM CO
t'j
258.70 *
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301.30
71
!2
I4 -I
• +•f••
•
* '
,4 CKS • —
�„
v
..1260.33 - -.. __.
-04/ 241.85__-
_.76.95— ____BIR.GF_ORO._TRUC
KIM G.
.— .1JNWEN.T_DR.Y
50_A626- B22- 82 —_ —_
•I
1985 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
126033
04/19/85
116U33
C4/24/85
116U33
U4/19/85
116J33
']4/24/85
126U33 __
__ _0_4/19/95
CHECK REGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 2
_- AMOUNT_ ____
- _VENDOR. -_..., _
ITEM DE SCR PTION
ACCON_NT NUS _.INY.- p_P.O.._p_11.E.SSAGE___
112.05
BERG --ORD
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82
I;
29535.70
103.95
B�P.GFORO
TgUCKTYG -
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 842 -84,-
27- 1300 - 000 -00
,
139.50
BERG=3RO
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 842 -84
'
_IN
205.16
BEP,GFORD
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 862 -86
�0
BRAUN
_ -_- -- 91._35
BERG =ORD
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 86286
PHOTO SUPPLIES
• 126037
729.86 f-
915.15
BRAUN
ENG
- -- -- - -- -
^IB
CONST COST
_ 126U34 _ -U,5 /01/85_,_ -__ _____ 12 .34 __BL00'LI.N6T04-CHRY -RLY -gEDRLR_pARTS
12.04
f f f f f i
'
,I
116031
0.4/19/85
29535.70
BRAUN
EVG
TESTING
IN
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
126C46
126037
05/!]1/85.__-
_9,594.14. -_
- BRAUN.ENG
10- 4504- 600 -60
TESTING
_IN
CONST. -COST
- - -- - - - - --
-- -23,30 •
116U37
U5/01/85
69921 *70
BRAUN
ENG
TESTING
IN
CONST COST
60 -1270- 000 -00 z'
PHOTO SUPPLIES
• 126037
05/01/85
915.15
BRAUN
ENG
TESTING
IN
CONST COST
60 -1300- 370 -01 Ia_
•i
126048
04/23/85
274.42
BRISSMAN KENNEDY
INC CLEAN SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
•
4
___.126U48
• fiftfi
126041 04/24185 844.23 BURY 4 CARLSON INC
• 126U41 04/19/85 257.35 BJRV B CARLSON INC
"i 126041 _ _ 04/24/85_ - - -_ 97.65 BURY g CAILS,ONINC
1*198.93
BLACKTOP
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
10-4524-301-30
1. . - -..
- - -- * **-CKS I"I.
nlflf
}IYI�
•'
'
,I
12SU53
05/01/85
123975
BROWNING
FERRIS
S�
10 -4250- 301 -30
•
126C46
05 /01 /85
20.00
BLUMBERPG PHOTO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 600 -60
11SU53
------ -
- - -- - - - - --
-- -23,30 •
-
REFUSE COLLECTION
�,
•''i
• !
126U41
U4/19/85
11.55
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10.450$- 440 -44 I "i
126053
U5 /C1_ /85_ -_
-
_60.00
11.55 *
FERRIS_
REFUSE C- CLLE
'
•i
126048
04/23/85
274.42
BRISSMAN KENNEDY
INC CLEAN SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
•
4
___.126U48
04/19/858.96
_
BRISSMA'N KEN OT
INC CL DA IES
10 -412M52,0- 52
1260.53
05/01/95
11.76_
263.38 +
FERRIS -_
- _REFUSc COLLECTION
- - -- - -;nil
•
126049 - _04/26185 _ _ _____72.25__ - --B URES_H__RDBER_T___ MEE -TANG .]0 4206- 4.40_44.
72.25
•
0
I;
I;
a:
• "
12SU53
05/01/85
123975
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10 -4250- 301 -30
_. 126053
05/01/85
12.52.
BROWNING_fERRIS
-
_REFUSE - COLLECTION
10 -4250- 446 -44
11SU53
05/01/85
66.26
BROWNINS
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10- 4250- 520 -52
•''i
126353
05/71/85
123.75
BP.OWYING
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10- 4250 - 540 -54
126053
U5 /C1_ /85_ -_
-
_60.00
R30WNT.'VG
FERRIS_
REFUSE C- CLLE
10 -4250- -62.
126053
05/01/85
136.12
BROWNTNG
FERRIS
-CT-ION
REFUSE COLLECTION
.628 _
10- 4250 - 646 -64
•
12SC53
05/U1/85
60*74
BROWNIN3
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10- 4250- 646 -64
1260.53
05/01/95
11.76_
BROWNING_
FERRIS -_
- _REFUSc COLLECTION
23- 4250 - 610 -61
126053
05/01/85
257.25
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTION
27- 4250 - 661 -66
•
126053
05/01/85
75.12
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTION
27- 4250 - 662 -66
_._7260_53
05- /01_/85
123.75-
BROWNING
FERRIS
R_EFUS-C_COLLE.CT.ION
29- 42-50- 708 -70
126U53
C5/(11/85
196.11
BROWNIN3
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
50 4250 841"84
•
126053
05/01/85
321 *16
PROWNTOG
FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
50.4250.861 -86
•
0
I;
I;
a:
vomn ., m� coIwA
cwccu '-oIsrEm
os-V,~u, pwnc n
/ --_cHcCn_mn Vo zmnup°oo�nca
i � |
�| vvnam.z9
" |"
� .
| vamos* o*/az/xn ay"no exrrcan ukncwnusc pxmro 10~4620~560~56 `
|`| 23°90
°
°°°~cno
' .1260*u - 04/2 4/85 7~4624~664~66_-__-'_'-_'
..
126060
. vaaoou
^^°°°°
04xe5/85 100.18 wMoxouAm01 yxuuxsc cmwccaoImma 27~4624~66*~66
0.4/30/85 on*°ro ^nexaomooa oxuoxsc unmccauzpmo 27~4624~664~66
`
a6u62 04v24/85
126062 04 12 2 vo5
-_-lzaoao-___-V4-/.4.o/-wn
|
°^^~Cna
|
--- -^
62.80 . enocu WHITE GEm muPpLzcm 10~450*-301'30 �]
oon°oo enncn unzrc mcm ouppLIcn 40~450*~801~80
__6a°o !,
.
-°°^~cnm'
l ^|
^. 1e6u7u o*ve3x85 41 *86 cwm'uum r4-rnno mcm ourpLzco 40~4504~80 3~80
�l-
__-1o6or� �
' 128°74 ° -----�
' --^°°°°° --------------------' --- _--'`_�-_^��~�n� '/
i-� 12607*
0*v19v85
1996*0900
1-9-960-O.D.
Czry or nLmonzwmrmx
CnmY wcnn
10~4200~480~48 /
^
°°°~cnm
. vaunvn
u*/23v85
27*.85
rncx cmLx onrvLzms
unmccmozmmo
27~4624~66*~66 i
�� n�n
_] u
c4v23v85
105°60
ooc* cmLx emrTLzmo
cnmocomzumm
28~4*24~704~70 |
| / 1260,r9
04/23v85
*o°om
cArco
pxmnu
10~4*20~560~56 !
--- ---'
'
. - -_ --_ -___----
~~~~CpS
' 126082
0.*/24/85
3*°c5
CONWAY rzlc u oxpETx
Comv mcmw��
'
-�
/ i —
34.25 °
°
|
--_'---_ ----�
°°°~zum !
� .---1260 85
32.3
�
!| �
� _,u6u86-___-0-4/-1 _°o�_--_-__raomnzzaOMo-SuppLY-- m--___acp-Um 3~00 0~0 0__---_--__'-_-__ `
126086 u4x�pvun 1*°00 cnomarmonu ouppLv co ncrumo MccH pcmnsr 10~3130~000~00
—
` 1m ° sm °
|,
r
_. �
1985 CITY OF EDINA
�7I ,
w
r
- -- AMOUNT-_
160.30
- -- -- _ 51 . 58
67.35
328.11
239.54
22.50.
297.10
44.P4
- -- - - -- _
22.50
-
731.40 *
126194 04/23/85 62.62
62.62 +
126114 04/24/85 - - - -- - 33.18 -
33.18 i
CHECK REGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 4
ra
-_-
VENDOR
R�LP�iON
AC.C�U11T�10•_1NV.•- q_P•.0•__p_
_ CHECK _N0..
-DATE
e.,
126UYU
Q4/22/85
362.50
126U9(l
U4/22/85_
CLEANING SUPPLIES
12609U
U.4/22/85
_C.4/30 /85- - --
CERT
POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
126091 --
04/23/85 -
�,
126091
0.4/23/85
REP_AIR- QAR_T_S
116U 91
Q4/23/85
10- 4620 - 560 -56
126091
0.4/19/85
REPAIR PARTS
126U91
04/23/95
PARTS
_ 126091 _._
_Q4/23/85-
�7I ,
w
r
- -- AMOUNT-_
160.30
- -- -- _ 51 . 58
67.35
328.11
239.54
22.50.
297.10
44.P4
- -- - - -- _
22.50
-
731.40 *
126194 04/23/85 62.62
62.62 +
126114 04/24/85 - - - -- - 33.18 -
33.18 i
CHECK REGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 4
ra
-_-
126120 0,4/24/85 79421 .49_ -_ DQRSEY_8 _WHITNEY- _PRO__ -SERV 10 -2010- 000- 00_____
1261 Z 04/24/85 29042.54 DORSEY B WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00
126120 04/24/85 59112.61 DORSEY 4 WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ;;a:
-- - - - - - - -- - 14576.64
**+-CKS -
126125
VENDOR
R�LP�iON
AC.C�U11T�10•_1NV.•- q_P•.0•__p_
MESSAGE__. -�_,
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
r ; 126125
05/01/85
362.50
MERIT
SUFPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 540 -54
12
_C.4/30 /85- - --
CERT
POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
�,
126125
CERT
POWER __TRAIN__-- _-
REP_AIR- QAR_T_S
10 -4540- 560- 56-
__.- ______.___.____. I<
10- 4620 - 560 -56
CERT
?DYER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
;5
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
126125 _
04/26/85 _-
814.59
I�
'
_GEN SUPP_LiES
_27 -4504- 661 -66
126125
U.4/30/85
,,
to
`
SUP-7LY
TRASH CANS
27- 4602- 662 -66
r I
04/24/85198.70
69286.94 +
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 520 -52
�t
CTTY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 540 -54
- CITY_
F EDINA __-- ___ - -_-
WATER_
27- 4258 - 646 -64
CITY
OF EDINA
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50 -4250- 821 -82
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
50 -4258- 821 -82
r
126143
___CITY
S1F_E11NA,__ - - --
-WATER
BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
- - --
- -- . ... - - - - - -
- -- - -- - - --
I19
s * * -CKS
;
- -- -- - - - --
CASH
--
REGISTER SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
�-
-
+++ -CKS
DELEGARD TOOL CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
- ----- -- * * +- CKS
-
126120 0,4/24/85 79421 .49_ -_ DQRSEY_8 _WHITNEY- _PRO__ -SERV 10 -2010- 000- 00_____
1261 Z 04/24/85 29042.54 DORSEY B WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00
126120 04/24/85 59112.61 DORSEY 4 WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 2010 - 000 -00 ;;a:
-- - - - - - - -- - 14576.64
**+-CKS -
126125
05/01/85
19206.60
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
r ; 126125
05/01/85
362.50
MERIT
SUFPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 540 -54
126125.,-- __-
_C.4/30 /85- - --
39346.00_
MERIT
SUP ?.LT
FERTIZER
LI
10- 4558 - 642 -64.
126125
05/01/85
437.25
MERIT
SUFPLY
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
rr 126125
44 /Z 4/85
78.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
126125 _
04/26/85 _-
814.59
_MERI'T_�UPPL7__
10- 4542 - 325 -30
_GEN SUPP_LiES
_27 -4504- 661 -66
126125
U.4/30/85
42.00
MERIT
SUP-7LY
TRASH CANS
27- 4602- 662 -66
r I
04/24/85198.70
69286.94 +
EA_P.�_F
_A�VD.ERSE�!
PARTS
10�4.b.20r .560 -56
r
i
�ry1
I ,.I
+ ++ -CKS 1- 1
4
126126
05/01/85
924.00
OAVIS
EUGENE
WEED CONTROL
60- 4100 - 985 -90
r
126126
05/01/85
51.16
DAVIS
EUGENE
MLILEAGE
60 -4208- 985 -90
- --
-- - - - --- - - - - --
- - - -- -- 9.75 .0 6._
I
ififf*
126136
74/24/85
115.00-
EARL F
ANDERSEN
CREDIT
10- 4542 - 325 -30
r
126136
04/24/85
85.00
EARL F
A;N3ERSEN
SIGNS b POSTS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
126136 -_
04/24/85198.70
-
EA_P.�_F
_A�VD.ERSE�!
PARTS
10�4.b.20r .560 -56
168.00
r
u+f *•
r
126143
Q4/24/85
118.62
EMRICH
BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
r
i
�ry1
I ,.I
+ ++ -CKS 1- 1
4
'`i
rrrrrr
*-CK S-
----12 �61.8 3.
5 tOt/-R 5
___L*23 GIVENS IN- Fm --ti PPI T r4z
1985
Y OF ED INA
7.23
CHECK ISTER
;-j
05-01-,
PAGE 5
126194
04/26/85
155.73 GENERAL C3MMUNICATNS RAOI3 SERV
10-4294-420-42
L_`i
--.
CHECK.
-Nae-DATE__ —..--.-kMLIU-NT-
05/G1/85
_VZA.00.3
TTEM-DES-C IPTION
—ACCOU NT—NO - __INV.-l_ Pe Oo ---
I-MESSAGE
558.94
126143
0,4/26/85
112.26
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27-4624-664-66
2
*►CKS
126148
0,4/22/85
26.30
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-449-44
126148
04/22/85
11080
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-449-44
rrrrrr
***-CKS
126153
0,4/23/85
16.93
ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
16.93
126154
04/30/85
504.60
JOE ELPAS
WAGES
27-4100-663-66
126154
C4/24/85
217.57_
JOE ELLAS
WAGES
27-4100-663-66
I
tar -CKS
L
126157
04/19/85
59700.30
50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN
RUBBISH BILLING
10- 4200 - 395 -30
5,700.00
rrr -CKS
_j
1261 62..-------0412,3./-8-5-----36l-o37
FOWLR ELEC.TRIC —REP-AIR
PARTS
Y0- 4540560 -56 ____
361.37 •
126164
04/23/85
19.66
FREEWAY 03DGE INC
PARTS
10-4620-560-56
1
1261
FREElA LD .On F' T r
PARTS
10- 4620x5. 60_ 5 -6
----------rwrrf
22.56
�d�1
126167
04/19/85
29635*30
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
INTEREST BONDS
27- 4300 - 660 -66
I.
rrrrrr
-CKS
126176
05/01/85
749.00
G*L*CONTR%CTING INC
CONT SERV
10-4200-345-30
749.00
'`i
rrrrrr
*-CK S-
----12 �61.8 3.
5 tOt/-R 5
___L*23 GIVENS IN- Fm --ti PPI T r4z
7.23
;-j
126194
04/26/85
155.73 GENERAL C3MMUNICATNS RAOI3 SERV
10-4294-420-42
L_`i
EDEA AL_CO.4MU.NI_CAT_NS RADIn sFRY
l0r4_294mT_4A0-t44.
126194
05/G1/85
25o71 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
558.94
***-CKS Izz
*-CK S-
ILI
171
1995 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK ,NO.__OATE ___.
r 1 f i r r
12 61 99
126199
s.
a,.
a.
v
%P
CHECK PEGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 6 r
AMOUNT VENDOR- - ITEM DESCRIPTION AC(<O1.LNL N0o 1NV..- p__P..O+_ -p MESSAGE
-- --- -- --------------- - - - - -! i r -CKS _ i "_
04/24/85 16.38 G T PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 �a a
T ?ARTS REPAIR PARTS 10.4540 Is
21.70 Ic
126203
04/19/85
126203 -
U4/19/85
126273
04/19/85
126203
04/19/85
126203
04/19/85._
126203
C4/19/85
126203
04/19/85
1262U3
04/19/85
126203
U.4/19/85-
1262J3
C4/19/a5
126203 _
04/19/85_
126203
04/19/85
126203
04/19/85
1262U3 --
U4/19/85_ -_ _
- -
126203
04/19/85
1262U3
04/19/85
126203.
U- 4/_19/85________ - - -___
r 1262U6
J4/19/85
429.40
G 8 K SERVICES
- - - -- - -
CKS-- !1]
- - -- - -. -- -
J
126206
04119/85.-
3.90
G_- &- K_SERVICES
__- _.LAUNDRY
.I
IIS
16.70
LESLIE
MARTIN
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 160 -16
10- 4262 - 560 -56
CREDIT
.70LESLIE
04/19/85
- MARTIN_. -
-__ ____. -_- PARKING --
10- 4206 - 420- 42___.
10- 4262 - 646 -64 <11�
REPAIR PARTS
7.70
LESLIE
MAP.TIN
PARKING
10- 4206 - 422 -42
40_262- 801 -80 __._______- __-- ._ -___
REPAIR PARTS
21.39
LESLIE
MARTIN
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4208 - 160 -16
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
1.75
_ -- __LESLIE
- MAR TIN___-
--- ---, -- PARKING- --
10- 4208- 260- 26...- -_._..
_ --
REPAI-R-RARTS
2.76
LESLIE
MARTIN
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 510 -51
PARTS
TOOLS
20.90
LESLIE
MARTIN
PROF SERV
10- 4224 - 420 -42
�,]I
PARTS
8.36_
LESLIE
MARTIN
POST
10- 4290- 160- 16_-
-_-
10.75
LESLIE
MARTIN
-AGE
LIC TABS
__-- ______-
10- 4310 - 600 -60
________'�^
'Z
1.31
LESLIE
MARTIN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 120 -12
•
_ 8.18
_.LESLIE_
MART INGEN
_SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420- 42__ -_ - - -_
4.65
LESLIE
MARTIN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 422 -42
31.99
LESLIE
MARTIN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 805 -80
I,
v
- 2.78
^ LESLIE
MARTIN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
1.0- 4508- 120- 12_�______-
_.____�___;
2.32
LESLIE
MARTIN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 421 -42
'
13.95
LESLIE
MARTIN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 422 -42
i,,';
38.06.-
L�SLIE_.hgRTIN___
-] P_}1�TO -PUPLIES
10-4508- 560 -56___
191.95
7
r 1262U6
J4/19/85
429.40
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
'10 -4262- 301 -30 ,
126206
04119/85.-
3.90
G_- &- K_SERVICES
__- _.LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 520 -52
126206
04/19/95
373.37
G B K SERdlCES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 560 -56
CREDIT
` 126206
04/19/85
252.75
G B K SEPVTCES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64 <11�
REPAIR PARTS
126206J4/19/85
________j .•I�
545.40
,(_8_�- SE_RYyCES
_LAU.NJZfti
40_262- 801 -80 __._______- __-- ._ -___
REPAIR PARTS
10 -6540- 560 -56
1 9674.82
110.42
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
i
r '
b
126 209
1262U9
126 209
126209
126 209
126209
126209
•d
� /rrrii
0
0.5/01/85
u.5/J1/85_
44%24/85
J4/22/85
_ (14/24/85
u4/24/85
0.5/U.1/85
126213 05/0.1/85 483.00 LEROY H LIBBY SERVICES 40- 4200 - 800 -80
480.30 +
HALLMAN LU.BRiCANTS 10- 461.8 - 5.60 -56
rii -CKS
+ ++ -CKS
,I%
'I\
CKS:...
37.31-
GENUINE
PARTS
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
__ 75.32
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56_ _--
________j .•I�
145.92
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -6540- 560 -56
110.42
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
- -�
__.24.32
GENUINE_PA.RTS
REPAI-R-RARTS
10- 4540 - 560- 56-____
^
----- --- ----
49.98
GENUINE
PARTS
TOOLS
10- 4580- 301 -30
268.75
GENUINE
PARTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
637.40 !
B<
126213 05/0.1/85 483.00 LEROY H LIBBY SERVICES 40- 4200 - 800 -80
480.30 +
HALLMAN LU.BRiCANTS 10- 461.8 - 5.60 -56
rii -CKS
+ ++ -CKS
,I%
- .
. 1985
, OF cozmA
cxccK -JznTER
05~01~"
pAsc r
c*ccn
m�._oxrc --__._--_-
_x�wmmT«�
mo°-zmV.-w'p°o.'w
MESSAGE__.-
12621
o4/23m5
19390.36
n«LLnvw
LomnIoxmTn
10-4618-56 0-56
�
--'--__
- 2 9161°36 _°_____________________
°^°~cno /
|'
mozzn
' --U4^19/85' ----------
105.76
.
----
*zLLSraun uuro oop
------
v sox yuppLIco
----------- ----'- -
10~4504~646~64
--- ' - 'i
. 126228
nwvvros
19646°56
ozLLsrnmn ^uru oop
r RcpAzn pxnvm
10~4540~560~56
vzoozn
o4x19e5 _-
1*°10~ _-__-
*zLLsrno* xuro oop
v --cncn
10~45*0~560~56
)
12622u
o*/19/85
955.54
nzLLxrxuw ^urc nop
v nxn7o
-1n~4ea0~5ao~so -
a6228
u4/19/85
vos°an
*ILLarxun « uro nop
v PAR TS
ap~«soo-aaz~aa
'
126e28
04m4/95
59. 63 --__
nILLornum xwrn aop
r_ �o"vza-p»n
--*cp'zm
27~45 40~662~6 6
126228
05/01/Q5
63°44
nzLLSrnmw ourn oop
v px--n
zr~45*V~66a~ae---'
1e6226
o4m9x85
113.22
xILLSrnon xuro oup
n PARTS
27~*620~662~66
'
126228
04m9r85
- ox"on _--__-*I
LLyrnmm.uuro.mup.n_-_.comz-ace�zno___-____'__�a�oa4a_n�r~�o
----
'|
39116"91 °
-- |
-----------------
-------
---'------'- --
-°^°-Cmo
12623u
0*v19x85
21 *95
worF uzLLmmuow
sEm ouppLzco
10~4504~420~42
|
12623u
04v2*v85
-w.os'-_--_--nopc_uzLLIxmanw_-_---
se��u�e��
63.30 °
'
-' -- '--
--- ---------'-
-------- -------
-- ----------- '
°°^~cwo !
126236
o*/znvuo
on°au
wreomrzsLmo
ncpxsn pxn7o
10~4540~520~52
!
2 5°2 4 °____-
-__' --- ---------
------^----^-
''^
°°°~cno �
1262*8
o*/ao/mx
40 .90
,
*wnnom smas
no"xzm p�n7m
1�����--------'--- --
' ���oaO-�a
- -
- /
40.90 °
°°^-cxs .
I.? 6,e 5o
z^vzov e »
_ ___'
Er xxozxrom_'____'znmr_uE�xzn
.
vo~*aom~o60~oa
|
126253
05v01 /on
2*.50
nuppwxcn nxnzorux
cmwr ncpxrno
� --�'
10~42*8~560~56
'
126253
05/01/85
ax°so
xowp4mcz yoozxrnx
cuwr xcpAzno
18~42 48~560~5e
-noo.u(l°
--' ---------
---' -
^°°~cwn |
126267
- - '--'--
04 /23185
—' -- '- --------
532925
--- -- --' -
ISM compup*rIom
comzp mxzmr
`------�,o���----
- ---
1
soa°zs °
'
°°°~cn3 /
126270,
- n���Y��s
--------n1°*5
000
«o�~�a
�
31.*5 °
---- ---- -' -
-
���----
---- --- -
^^°~cno '
|
126277
0 */26x6 5
299.95
cxoLanN pnImrrmm
coucxrznm pnuGnxmu
10~*280~504~50
� /~
�z�arr
o���oxon _-'-
_--_,.000°�U-_--___cxnLnow
pxIwrzms-_--_'
pnzmzzm
---pnzm7zms
10~4*00~500~50
!'|
126271
04/26185
au�o�
u,00V°nn
cxnLuoN pnImrznm
0~4600~627~62 '--
'
126277
04v26/85
11000.o0
cuRLsnm pnzmrzwa
pnxnrzmn
3~4600~*10~61
i /�
L
V
i
v
v
v
v I
!r
i
%w
r
i
b
i
ti
1985 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 8
CHECK ,NO._
DATE_ ___,___ - _gMOUNT_______
b 1263U4
-_ yEVDOR
126304
05/01/85 - - -- - - -
ITE.M_O�SCRIPTION
ACIOUN. T- NJ. _lNV"_._e.0•_ll_MESSAGE_
`r 126304
u4/19/85
12530.4
04/23/85_ -_
1263U4
04/19/8`.
126304
04/19/85
50.59
-__,_
LUM9 --R
126277
04/26/85
1$000. ^0
CARLSON
FRINTING
8.99__
PRINTING
26 -4600- 688 -68
CO
126277
X4/26/85___ -___ _
_ 1X695.]0 ---CA
RLS ON_PR
TNT ING- _ -__PRI
NUNG
27_-4600- 660- 66_____.____
i<
126277
04/26/85
1900000
CARLS3N
PRINTING
KNOX
PRINTING
28- 4600- 706 -70
GEN
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
99123.05 •
23 -.p -4
KNOx-
LUMBR -_CO
GEN-
S.UPPIIES
'
36987
KNOX
LUMB_R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
_
10 -4504- 646 -64
I`
220.69
126278
04/23/P5
35.72
JERRYS
FOODS
10- 4504 - 646 -64
' -CLEAN SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 440 -44
10-4512-440-44
9
19
126278
126278
04/24/85
12.01
JERRYS
FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
- - -_ ._4 7.73 •
I„ .
126279
04/19/85
9011
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
�!
c .
126279
04/19/05 _
62. P1 _
JFRRYS
OUR
.OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 325- 30_._.__.
126279
04/19/85
44.90
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 390 -30
1262!9
U4/19/85
12.89
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
126279
04/19/85
____ _40.72
JERRYS
-OUR
OWN
HDWE_ - -_-
GEN- _SUPPLIES.
_10 -45C4- 440- 44- ._ - -__
126279
64/19/95
9.46
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
_ __ -__
10 -4504- 446 -44
126279
04/19/85
1.98
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 540 -54
1262f9
J4/19/85 _ ^ !
- At. 44_
JERRYSOU3
_OWN._H04E
GEN_.SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
126279
04/19/85
41 .1 8
JERRYS
OUR
O;lN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
126279
04/19/85
8.80
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 801 -80
126219 _
U4/19/85
33.37 -------
`- ___JERRYS_OUR._
OWN-
HOWE _
_CORRECTION
10- 4504- 802- 8G____ -____
126219
04/19/85
33.37
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOW-_
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 802 -80
126279
04/19/85
33.37
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 802 -80
____1Z6279
04 /19/851.29..
J�RRYSOU3_OWN._HDWE
PHOTO- SUPPLIES
126279
04/19/85
4.17
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
1262f9
U4/19/85
24.13
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOVE
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64
1262/9 _ _ ,.
04/19/85
_ 57.56..--
JERRYS__OUR
OWN
HOW_ -
- _TOOLS
-_10 -4580- 301 -30
126279
04/19/85
16.56
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
10 -4580- 646 -64
126279
04/19/85
23.89
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
ACCESSORIES
10- 4620 - 560-56
_- 126279
04/19/8583.25_
JERRYS
OUR
_OWN _HOWE
REP ALR_PARTS-
2.7 -4504- 661 -66
126279
04/19/8:
10.00
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 661 -66
126279
04/19/85
13.72
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
27 -454q- 661 -66
I'
126279
04/19/85 _
. 10.40 _
JERRYS
OUR
_OWN _.HOWE
-__
CHEMICAL_
27 -4564- 661 -66
126279
L4/19185
25.86
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
CHLORIDE
27 -4620- 662 -66
126279
U4/19/85
25.29
Jr- RRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
___ 126279_
�04/19/BS
04/19/85___
_ 4.98
_ -51.22
JERRYS
OUR
0W"DWE
GEN SUPPLIES
29 -4504- 720 -72
126219
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWL
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
126279
04/19/85
46.56
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOW-_
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
.,I.
126279 _
J 4/19/85 _
-
_ _ 6.06-
--
JERRYS
0UR_QWN_H_DuE
REPAIR PARTS
4.0 4.540- 807- 80_
679.63 •
-__._
s j
126292 04/30/85 139521.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSUANCE
- -- -------- --- - - - --- - -- � 3.5.21_.0.0 • ____, -
126304
04/24/85
b 1263U4
0,4/24/85
126304
05/01/85 - - -- - - -
126304
U4/22/85
`r 126304
u4/19/85
12530.4
04/23/85_ -_
1263U4
04/19/8`.
126304
04/19/85
>r
10- 4260 -510 -51
I,,
1:
Lc
••• -CKS n.
-13.08
KNOX
-
LUMP--R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
50.59
KNCX
LUM9 --R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 390 -30
8.99__
__KNOX_LUMB
=R
CO
GEN_SUPP_L.IES
__10- 4504- 390- 30_.___.
61.50
KNCX
LUM9 -_R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 440 -44
54.18
KNOX
LUMB =R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
23 -.p -4
KNOx-
LUMBR -_CO
GEN-
S.UPPIIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
36987
KNOX
LUMB_R
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
_
10 -4504- 646 -64
I`
220.69
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
GEN
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
_i
19E5 T
OF EDINA
CHECK
- LISTER
05- 01 -6 _
PAGE 9
AM- OU -NT..
ND -QI
PT= M nEQU,RIPITON
ACCDU. ALNO .- .IN.W"_P�Oa- #-
RESSAGE��_,
126304
04/19/85
278.15
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
I;
_..12630.4 _--. --._.
44/ 3^/ 85 ___- .,.__----
_�- _- _Z_Z- .52 -.__
KA10K -L U9B= R_CO --
-_- REPAIR -PARTS
10- 510- 51,--
1263Q4
U4/22185
50.98
KNOX LUM8EP CO
REPAIR PARTS
_4540- _------
10- 4540 - 540 -54
- - -_ -- ---- . - --I^
10,
12630.4
04/30/85
55.79
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMNBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
(.:!._____126304.�_.�U4/19/_85_
- _45.1 -0
KKQX! LUMBE�C.D
w_- LUMBER
1.0- 4.60..4,._6.46 -_64
F)
�"
1263L'.4
1263L'.4
04/30/85
46.78
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
_
10- 4604 - 646 -64
116304
04/3U/85
78.66
KNCX LUMP.,'R CO
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
126304 __- _.
-__u4/ 26185
19. -98_
__KNQX_LU.MB_.R._C_C..
___-- LUMBER
126304
L4/30/85
42.17
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
"
12630.4
04/30/85
42.85
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
12630404122 185
126304
29_#76
_KICX- LUMBER -CD
.- __- _LUMBER
27_.4604 - 662 -66
04 /30 /85
41 .3.5
KNOT( LUMBER CO
LUMBER
27- 4604 - 662 -66
1263U4
44/19/85
48.44
KNOX LUMBER CU
LUMBER
27- 4604 - 662 -66
I,o
126304_____-
_04130 /8560
Q
K.NOX__ LUMBER -_C 0_
-. .CON.T_.REQ.IIRS
ITS
126304
04/30/85
29988
KNOX LUMBER CO
CONT REPAIRS
28 -4248- 708 -70
126304
04/26/85
54.76
KNCK LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
t_._
- -- _126304_ -_
_ 64/23/85
_ 7.67
T ^ -23.79
KJ�fOK- LUMBEftC.0_
_aEV- S.UPPIdFS
28- 708 -7.0
-
I'
126304
04/23/85
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
_4504-
28 -4504- 708 -70 ~-
_I' -^
2r
126304
126304
04/26/85
21.47
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
2d -4504- 708 -70
!2,
04/23/.85._-
-2._77
7t
KN-
_.__GEN - SUPPLIES
125304
04/23/85
10.90
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEd SUPPLIES
28- 45 04- 708-70 -
-i
126304
04130/85
10.35
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
31
KNOAI_LUMB R_CC
_LUMBER
78 -4604- 708 -_70_-
!3-'
126304
04/23/85
106.20
KNCi( WMP.cR CO
LUMBER
28 -4604- 708 -70
_
•,
125304
1;4/24/85
36960
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEV "SUPPLIES
40- 450'4- 801 -80
;
-..-1 26 - - - - -
--
- - 3.
- -
'I
.I
12637.4
04/24/85
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPP IES
40- 4504 - 3- 80 - - -- - --
80
- -- r -- i
1 ,825.87 i
i
#i# -CKS -
_- 12631 Z05!24[85_-
36...52 1 AWS.ON_PRDDUCISEN-
SUPP_IES
126317
04/24/85
111.57
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
<'
126317
U4/22/85
92.17
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
_ 12631 -7
- ._4510.1_ /85123.85
LA NS3NPRQDUC_LS
GEmS.UPP.LIES
10- 325 -30
<,
126317
U5/01:/85
290.68
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEI SUPPLIES
_450.4-
10- 4504 - 646 -64
126317
04/22/85
124.90
LAWSON RROOUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
_._126317_--
--D5/01/_85
_____75.52
IAWS.O-�LP.RODUCTS
REPATR PARTS
10- 4.540- 560 -56
126317
04/24/85
315.43
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 46.20- 560 -56
:I
1,170.74 #
f ## -CKS IJn
i
126323_04/23/.8.5
126323
--_
0.4/19/85
�- _29 -7.50
29.75
L- 2NH0FE -__
SEN__.S11P_P..LIES
10- 45C4- 260 -.26_
LIN190FF
PHOTO SUPLIES
10- 4508 - 440 -44
i:•I
126323
04/19/85
4. 5D
LINHOFF
PHOTO SLPPLIES
10.4508- 440 -44
��.
_-
126323,__
135-1 .Q1L8
4.50
J TNRD FF
PHOTO S1IPPLTFC
1A 6S
,
Icn
336.25 •
- --
- -_
"
126324 -__ -44/19.1.85
_- 10.236.3.4
LOrT
OMP_LLLER- CHARGE-
10- 4228 - -.16
126324
04/19/85
519.93
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
.160
10- 4230 - 160 -16
I„
I
126324
C4/19/85
1,978.22
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
10- 4233 - 200 -20
_126324.._
52-42_1.9[85
96919 _L -0625
rDMPUT.EB_CHARGES
T0- 2
j
126324
U4/19/85
746.05
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
_.42-33- .42.0--t.4
10- 4233 - 560 -56
_
126324
U4/19/85
19919.47
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
40- 4232 - 800 -80
I7.
17�
V �
. I
1985 CITY OF EDINA
_.. CMECK_N0._ DATE
CHECK REGISTER
05 -01 -85 PAGE 10
__- AMOUNT - _�-- UEN002 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUyT NO.._INY. -M P•0• / MESSAGE
116324 C4/19/p5
126324 _ 04/19/85_._______ _
126324 u4/19/85
126337
1[6331 04/23/85
126337 04/23/85
116337 U4/2.3/8 -5 -__ ._.
126339
f ■ ■ #rf
04/23/85
19066.26 f
397.76 LAKELAND ENG REPAIR PARTS 10 -4274- 449 -44
397_.76 ± _
126342 C4/23/85 17.27 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
ti. 1[6341 C5/C1/85 7.20 MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
126342_,._ -__ __ u4 /23/8.5_ -- 178 .85 MAC 0UE'EN .DUI° -INC_ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56
203.32 * -
ie.
to .
- _.....___ *** -CKS
1=
'z
*** -CKS
�i
i
283.12
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES 50- 4233 - 820 -82
13 ,
-- 283.12_ - __
-_IOGI 3
COMPUTER - 0ARGES 50- 4233 - 840 -84
283.11
LOGIS
-�-,
it
COMPUTER CHARGES 50- 4233 - 860 -86
ti
89218.55
04/23/85
92.00
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 449 -44
* ** -CKS
c
7.69 ___ --
____LAKE - _STATE
EQUIP_
- - --.- REPAIR. -PARTS
368.68
LAKE STATE
EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
13.02
684.68
LAKE STATE
EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
5.21 __--
IAKE- ST_AT'_
EQUIP
_--- R.EPA.IR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -5.6
19066.26 f
397.76 LAKELAND ENG REPAIR PARTS 10 -4274- 449 -44
397_.76 ± _
126342 C4/23/85 17.27 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
ti. 1[6341 C5/C1/85 7.20 MAC QUEIEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
126342_,._ -__ __ u4 /23/8.5_ -- 178 .85 MAC 0UE'EN .DUI° -INC_ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56
203.32 * -
ie.
to .
- _.....___ *** -CKS
1=
'z
*** -CKS
�i
i
v
ffr#f#
,
- _- -- ---- -_ #••- CKS_
-�-,
it
ti
126344
04/23/85
92.00
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 449 -44
126344
-_ 04/23/85._- -__ -
-- __71•!70_.
MED OXYGEN _8_EOUTP
EQUI? MA.LNT
10- 4274 - 449- 44
126344
04/23/85
13.02
MEO OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 449 -44
ar
126344
05/Q1/85
78.35
MED OXYGEA & EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
.
- - -- - - - -- ---- - -'
- -- 254.37 * -
-- -' - - --
---
� .
AW
* ** -CKS
�< .
126346
04/19/85
1859747.56
MET Y WASTE C L COMM
SEWER
40- 4312 - 800 -80
v
1859747.56 *
,.
r r f r r f
- --- -* ** -CKS
I`
146353
_. �4- /2.4/85
31.34
�
MINN,:AZ k- GLOVE
GEN_SUPPIIFS
1n -4504- 5.60- 5�------
31.34
.--------
- - - - --
mr
IT
��
i
_ #f• *rr
- - -- - - -- -
- - - -- - -
__- - - - - -- - -_ _.
--_ -. _ _
-- f *• -CKS
- -- - - - -- --
r•,
125356
04/26/85
176.97
MINN =S9TA BLUEPRINT
BLUE PRINTING
10- 4570 - 260 -26
_126356_____U4/26/8.5
^-
267.F5-.MINNESOTA
BLUE?
_RI,NT
BLUE PRINII)�LG
10- 4_570_260- 26
125 356
04/26/65
91.63
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
' BLUE PRI NTINS
10 -4570- 260 -26
_
eo
536.45
r f • • • f -
-- -- -------------
- -- - --
f r • -CKS
125359_ -
-_ 0.412,4/85
265.13 MLNNIDRQ SNC_
R.EP._AIS-P-A.RLS
1_D -4-5 40- 560 -56
126359
05/'01/85
31.21
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
_
10- 4540 - 560 -56
er''
126359
04/24/$5
21.60
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
v
1985 Y
OF EDINA
CHECK _GISTER
05 -01 -._
PAr,E 11
_ CHECK _N09_DA.TE__
_ AMOUNT_- __..
-__
V_NQ.C3__— _
ITEM_DESCAI�LIAN
nCCOUNT .NO._.INY._tl_ P.O. 9
MESSAGE .__.
126359
04/24185
33.63
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
125359
U4/23/85
29524.00_
HINN TORO_._ INC_.____. ._-
_- _- CAPITAL._..OUTLAY
1.0 -4900- 600 -60
126359
04/30/95
59386.30
MINN TORC INC
CAPITAL OUTLAY
10- 4900 - 600 -60
125359
04/19/85
121.65
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
126359
_G4 /23/85_- __
-___ ____ _98.84-
-
---__-MINN
TORO_.. INC ,-
rTEPAIR -P_AE.TS
2.24.540 -_ 662- _66_ ^___
89482.06
f
126360
04/30/85
- 39945
- _-
_- _MINNESO.TA.._WANN_R - -.. --
- __.._.GEN- _SUP-PL.IES —__
28- .4504 - 708x7.0.
30.45
*
+ ++t ►+
-
116362
04/23/85
217.69
MOOEL STONE COMPANY
CONCRETE
10- 4528- 301 -30
I
126362
04/23/85
439.65.
MODEL STONE._ COMPANY. ____.__.GEN_
- SUPPLIES___
40- _4504- 783- 78.__ -__
657.34
+
126371
05/01/85
432.00
MILROFF STEEL
CONT REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
432.00
' --
- - - -- - -- - --
_ -- - - - - --
- - - - -- --
f + *f +r
• ** -CKS
126376
04/24/85
101.60
MODERN EQJIPMEVT
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 805 -80
101.60
•
*f*arr
* ** -CKS
126381 - - _
_ 04/26/85
_ 85900_
-
____ -- STAR_&._ TRIBUNE___- _----
.- ADVERT.IS.ING
10- 4212 - 120- 12___
126381
0.4/26/85
80900
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISIIG
- -.
10- 4212 - 160 -16
126391
04/26/85
120.70
STAR & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10 -4212= 640 -64
!
126391
04/26/85 ._
_ 46992
STAR_ &- TR.IBUNE____.____
AOVE.R7ISLRG
.23- 42.1.4 -. 610 -61
331.92
+
- - - - --- -
CKS -
126383
04/23/85
9,265.58
MPLS COMP TR_AS
WATER
30- 4640 - 783 -78
!
-99265.58
•-
• ** -CKS
126385
05/C1/85
360. ?0
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTIONS
10- 4242 - 353 -30
126385
(15/01/85
1.080.cr)
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTIONS
60- 1300 - 015 -18
-
- I944C.C-0
' -
--- - - - - --
---- - - - - --
- - -- - -- - -
* **-CKS
126400
U4/19/85
925.52
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
10- 4616 - 560 -56
925.62
-- - - - -- -- - -
- - - --
---------- --
* *+ -CKS
126403
CONLREP-AIRS
?L- 4.2.48- 661 -66_-
9n.00
-
-
*** -CKS
^~ �
^pus cxrY O
OF coImA c
17700 O
cxErn ncazo7cn 0
05~01~85 p
p»as oa
�.
°°°~cnm
/ v
vZ6421 _ _
_0.4x2^/-85 _
__,sa.,o'-_-_-_o�onN-Cm«Iw u
u�cAoL V
V�.gp
/
126436 o
o4/23v85 1
196°60 p
pumpm u wErcn ocnx n
ncpArm pxnxo 1
10~4540~540~54 r
r-
,
,pa.om_°_________-____ -
- '_-__------ -
---- -- - -
- - '
'-�
^~ . °
°^°~cno '
'
�
1264*1 0
04v2*x85 7
7.33 T
THE pxrmr swnp x
xoxcnrzozno 5
50~4214~822~82 i
i
= l
lia4 41 0
04/2*185 7
7.34 T
THE pncmr oxop x
xuvcxrxmz*o 5
50~4e14~842~84
vz6441 0
0*/24/85 -
--- _ r.»n -
--__-Jnc-��zm{ smnP-__-_-_---_x -
-�214-u62c8m_-_'-
ac.00 °
° '
'
'
--^°^^°�---------'------'----'------�------ _
__-__-°�°~�mo_| '
w 1
126*45 0
05/01/85 ,
,,»os.*n p
pxpEm cxL41Emonm u CO p
pxnro 1
10~4620~560~56 |
|^ '
^°^~cxo '
'
125*52 u
u4/24/85 z
za o
nuzcm ycnx axrrcnv u
ucpxxT Pourn 1
10~*5*0~560~56 �
�
°~
125451 0
0*/24x85 4
40.86 m
mwIcv osnV oxrrcnv n
nsPxIn pxnro '
'10~*54q~560~5* )
)� '
125452 0
04/24/85 1
111.61 _
_oo!cK oEn« exrrcnv-_--'__JmEpx%O-PARTS 1
10~45*0~5*0~56
'
12645u 0
004 /24r8 5 2
2*"24 o
ouzr( usov ox7rcxv n
nspAIm pxn7m 1
10~4540~560~56
� |
,W 1
125452 0
04a4v85 v
va.o* u
uozoo acnv exrrcnv n
nEpxIn pxnro 1
10-4540-560-56 �
|
i`-
04/24/85 z
zl.»»- U
Uz�a���6_-___.-__--------- -
� o
oor.�o °
° .
-_''d
.^�
%W
`^
°^°°^° - —
— - - - -
-----�---' -
-- _
_-__---_-
-
-- ^^°~�ws !
!
,|
^~�1 1
126451 o
osxovvxs 1
18.60 x
x.L.snuLo u co.zwc. s
scw suppLxcn 1
10~4504~318~30
-'-2e6*57_____04/2-3/- _
__20.`» 2
2m/�.______
3
39.12
° .
.�j
' ^
^°°°°°�----- -
--------------- -
----------------' -
--- -----_ °
°°~cns
1au*a` 0
0,4/24/85 1
110. 10 x
xcco SALES u ncnozcc s
scw ouppLrco 1
1o~4so4~m*a~a* 1
'
126461 u
u*/aa,^s 1
125.40 R
RFF� q��F� I q�RVTrP r
rrU �IMP�TCe q
q�-4rnL-�A��AA
�J^
235^-���
w�..
126465 ouvo��xn zv 5n
°
. --------.- .°�"�,��
'---
-------
nzcoFzsLn 3Lune m CO
GE11 SUPPLIES 28-4504-708-70
('.
i,
_
|-
°°°~Cns
~
`
/`
126490 04/22/85
1264911 03L0.1 /A5
1e6492 05/01/85
131 *90
-99-36—
231.26 *
80.95
Rn - a c;
SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES
glirRUTM WTI I TAMS PiT ?Jlr
10-4504-325-30
1n-Lr.4,L-v%r-%n
sourHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56
I-
-***-CKS J"'i
***-CKS 1l Tt
1935 fY
OF EDINA
CHECK -GTSTER
05 -01 -a,
PAGE 13
r.
CHEC-K-NO-sL-DA-T-E
--AMOUNT
Ur Nn 04
ITEM nrsrErTTfnN
srrnulyt run*- IN- Ve- b_P.O� -.p-
MESSAGE,
—
126469
04124/85-.------------293.1
2.--.ROAD-MACHl,.4ERY----REPAIR--P-ART.-q
:4540- 560- 56-
126469
04/22/85
216.67
ROAD Mk-CHINERY
REPAIR PARATS
--10- -.____
10-4540-560-56
126469
L4/22/85
70.84
ROAD MACHINERY
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
c
17
In
**,--CKS
126473
04/24/85
91.56
R.E. MOONEY 9 ASSOC.
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540-805-80
91.56
***-CKS
1264 75--------.O-5jl0,j-a5
—1-27.-66---RU.E.EAID_GE_j.OH_NSgN______T()OLS
1211.66
126479
04/19/85
158.04
R & A SPE:IIALTIES
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248- 707 -70
***-CKS
126481
04/24/85
47,50
ST i:-'GI!S PtA:PER Co
GUARD RAILS
10-4546-340 30
47.50
C KS
---.I -d 64 8-3-0.5/-QJJ-145---1.6.,Z3,--SAiULLE&U?-?-Lr
BEN SuPPL TER
in-4sn4,-48,0v,,-4-R
16.23
1[6484_ - --
0.4/2 3/85 —.
AMERI.C.&N-S.HARECOM...
TEl EP-HOKE
510- 5.1--
126484
04/26/85
101.91
AMERICAN S'lARECOM
TELEPHONE
10-4256-510-51
237.12
126465
04/23/85
778.98
STATE BLDG ZNSP
BLDG PERMITS
10-3095-000-00
126485
U.4/23/85
90050
STATE BLDG INSP
SUR CHG TAX
10-3113-000-00
-- - - -
69-,4-8-.
126486
04/26/85
60.00.
DON STREIC4ER GUNS
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10-4266-420-42
CENTER-
35 92 RAnyo FoliTp
10 - 4 9 1 &"-- 2JL--4-2
--**-C:KS
126490 04/22/85
1264911 03L0.1 /A5
1e6492 05/01/85
131 *90
-99-36—
231.26 *
80.95
Rn - a c;
SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES
glirRUTM WTI I TAMS PiT ?Jlr
10-4504-325-30
1n-Lr.4,L-v%r-%n
sourHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56
I-
-***-CKS J"'i
***-CKS 1l Tt
,vwo czry
or cuINA
cmccm xcs/orcn
05~01~85 p^ac 14
roIECn_wo.-_0*7c_-
m°-g_2°0°_w-ncSiSoec---_,
^
~
-
126495
c*/aw 5
zso
i"
�.
.
�
/
|
-
1265uZ
o4v23ve5
,n"
15.47
~ '
126503
c*m9v25
19.
In-
12650
04/23/05 _
37*01
SU9JIBA-4 3LUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10-4 5 40- 80 3- 80
musuz
c4/23/85
37.01-
�
1265u3
04v23v85
sr°
REPAIR ��
- - - -- —
-
56. 54
c
~ /
~^~~CnS
126505
o4x26rnx
v .81
oum
xovcnTxozxe
10~4210~1*0~14
�1~
°°°-cwo �1
`|
126508
04/26/85
162.60
ST -7AUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-260-26
~
---~-
^-'~~'-~
'~`~
~' '~~L ~^~^
==" ""'-^^E"
10-45x4-260~26
~
12659.8
u*v26185
vs.ar '___--aT"A
uL'enon______'scm
ouppL
10-4504-420-42
�
'
vuosou
u*/soxos
a.*r
mr pxuL eaxw
Gcm ouppLIcu
10~*504~4a0~
~
126508
u*v22/85
128.57
sr PxuL noom
scm ouppLJzca
10~*504~*40~**
~
`aa»ox-
05/01/85
__39.11
I_�uoL-noon____-6cm.
Su��Lzc
0-450*~**0~44
12650.8
u*xcz/n»
,x.no
or p*oL aoow
orrzcc omPpLzcm
10~4516~510~51
.
^
1e6508
a*voc/nn
50.48~
or pvoL ozmn
cxEoIr
'10~4516r510~51
.
12*5o8 _
04v19ve5
52.vV~_____-
T'p«uL-eoox�_-__--cn�oxI�0~*51*~510~51
_-_
126506
04ve3/85
18*.n2
or PAUL aonn
opprcc suppLzco
10~*516~510~51
'
�
vzuxou
c4 /30 v8 5
*zz . «n
mr p* m� oonx
orp�cc oupp��co
�o~*s��~s��~n�
^
i^ ~
`zonuV __u*/aaxoz
o*/eafVs
__rn
vl'5sSI-PxV�
pDoKDrpzC��uPPLJ
10-4516 —600-60
lzanuu
° 89
ST p^oL poou
n^non cmozp
19-4914 *2a *a
126508
U4/19/95
s.p*
or "xoc eJon
mcm uuppLzco
U«~
23-45 610-61
°aanuu
_ 04x19v85 _
11.62
ST �AUL BOOK - -_--__--_-_.ucw-uoPpLzc
3~*50*~*11~61
~
126508
u4x19/95
s°vo
or DAuL aoon
mcw uuppLzco
23~45 04~611~61
!~`
� |
126509
u*119/95
s°ao
ST PAUL eoom
acm ouppLIcu
2n~4 50 4-61 ,~a,
.1aa5uu__C4/2o/mx
--__--__---_1~�
_�
I _�yUc_
�_�
-4516~660~6*
1oano u
u�vu�vo 5
° r r
mr puo� 000�
orpzcc uo;FpLIco
27~4516-663 *a
!`. �
�
1265o8
u*voyvns
8.00
ar 34;uL anom
mcm suppLzco
28~*504~708~70
`]~
126508
v4/a4fV�_'
ls ���
801r80_-
'"
-.
'
12 1n.
2,142.50
—
cnm -
- '-- --
'
2,142.50
,
/
^~
."....
C4,24'8'
31.70
""",""~N .°C""` uE"°
Cvw^ *Er^I°*
50-4248-861 -86
~
.~_
�u � �1 �
-- __ -----_-_-
0,4/22/85
aa°va
o r noae
scw uupPzcm
10~4504~560~56
�
. .
-_-_ '--_---
w
/ �vm . , or sozmA cmcc uzsrcx 05~01~ pAmc 15
�
-___CHEcm_mm"_D&IE____
!�! _----'_ ----__-_-
1oon,o--__-u4vZ.n���
126516 usvuvmn
— - -----
----U---- -
°_��w�-mp°o°_w-a�s
aa°,a
r
,°°~cny |"
!'
--sr°�__�����c��__�
4s°vz u
uc*no nncoucm n
ncpxzn Pxnvm 4
40~4540~803~80 ._
,Uo.oa ^ !
!.
°°°-cny ,
__''-_300.78 --_-___ocumu s
szs-Ln'_-__--o 0
0wt4a_-'____
126526 04/23 /85 5 046.99 '
' __xcm a6 oon
.-. . o,8aa°99 °
c
'| �°°°^° -- --- ---'----
~nno
/ . --- --- -- ------------ --- --
^. 126539 uwa3/oo 19054 ro ruxp suppLr cnmpxmv cmcmzCALm 27~45*4~662_6*
'-12 6 5 39---_-_�A. 146 IS 27-4
1 9201°20
°
-`� 126541 04m9x85 39.98 7*nscr mcm ouPpLxso 10~4504~440~44
`!- -_1265*1 v
i'. 1sv°v0 ° [
~'
-12*542-'__'__o-4/231-8s_--___--____265°-lL3_-___-_ronNVozur ao~sa---__--_-' ----------^
265.13
1265*5 04v23xe5 1659*8 nonv ory mAxxsc noon mcpxzn PARTS 10~4540~540~54
`
--- -
",.
1265*8 04x19v85 716985 THE pnzmr owup PnzmTzms 23~4600~610~61
�|.
716°85 °
- -_--__- -
-!
|-/ ___xzy�n� u*��Yx4� ae°�V___-__-umzs�mm�-umLxnzrco______umz 4aaa~*oO�oa
|�- 126551 04/19/85 39797* umIponno umLznzrco umspoun wcLoucwcc 1u~4aaa~^z1~o2-------
�
125551 o*/,m/wn 4°n9 wmzpomnm umLznIrco scm ouPpLzEm 10~4504~440~44
�'..
- _''---_-_ - --
|^|
126565 04m9/85 20003 wzKrwG TmnwoTnL nTn mcm muPeL%Eu 10~4504~480~48
ooO°oV �
°°°~cmu �=|'
'
'
cxm
-
c
__
1265*5 04v23xe5 1659*8 nonv ory mAxxsc noon mcpxzn PARTS 10~4540~540~54
`
--- -
",.
1265*8 04x19v85 716985 THE pnzmr owup PnzmTzms 23~4600~610~61
�|.
716°85 °
- -_--__- -
-!
|-/ ___xzy�n� u*��Yx4� ae°�V___-__-umzs�mm�-umLxnzrco______umz 4aaa~*oO�oa
|�- 126551 04/19/85 39797* umIponno umLznzrco umspoun wcLoucwcc 1u~4aaa~^z1~o2-------
�
125551 o*/,m/wn 4°n9 wmzpomnm umLznIrco scm ouPpLzEm 10~4504~440~44
�'..
- _''---_-_ - --
|^|
126565 04m9/85 20003 wzKrwG TmnwoTnL nTn mcm muPeL%Eu 10~4504~480~48
ooO°oV �
°°°~cmu �=|'
'
'
cxm
-
c
__
°°°~cmu �=|'
'
'
cxm
-
c
__
1985 cIry
or coIwA
coccn
ncazsrcn
os~ov~os pxsc 16
^
^~
1265 12
- 5��
n_
zwxcmTnnn
'23~120�~000~00 r
|_
__C*czn_mn,_oxm�___________^MOu�L�
.
___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_
126572
C4/30/85
v 9162.)3
°_Imn°_�p^o°_mmcaaum�----
.
GEN SUPPLIES
26-4504-688-68 |
'
126572
_ U4/3 U/85
z 446 z5
12'
u4/30v85
22.95
04~ /
cLor
126572
04/30/85
i '
�
..� ' 126571
04m4m5
110000
x u v y^rrcnv
xcpxzn nAo7o
10~4 5 40~560~56
' 126571 ---
u4ve4/85 ----
----- 77.50 '----'--_-
mcmxzccm
10~422*~504~50
-_--_ --
/ �|
126571
u4v2*i85
3F .75
A u Aomrrcuv
PAR TS
620~560~56
[�|
�
�
|
�
~�
w
°~
�
�.
126593
`a*5v3
,aa5v3
,z6sv3
-- ' -
vaox9*
"
C |
^
'
1265 12
- 5��
n_
zwxcmTnnn
'23~120�~000~00 r
.
u*v23/85 ___
___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_
126572
C4/30/85
v 9162.)3
VAN PAPER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
26-4504-688-68 |
'
126572
_ U4/3 U/85
z 446 z5
112. 58___
u4/30v85
22.95
04~ /
cLor
126572
04/30/85
v 9160.00
VAN PAPER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28~4504~704~70
- '---
------------------'--.|
u*119/85
39604"16
sromc pnoxr
mcmxzccm
10~422*~504~50
.
3960 .1
cns -
126579
04/24/o5 ____________-177.613______WzLL-IAMm-srccL~mows_____Rsm_no2�L,zc
'
126579
05vu`/85
s' ~ rr
wzcLIxna
orccL~nuuc
sex ouppLxco
10~4504~646~64
!
126519
u4vawn»
*"n
WILLIAMS
ar---cL.mouc
ucLozms ouppLsca
10~4610~560~56
126579
04/24/85 _
_ _ 109 °37 -_____wzLLI^ma-arccL~oowc--__�
PARTS
0~4oZV~saO~sa_--
voanry
04/24/85
213.78
WILLIAMS
urc:-'L.nnWs
pxnrm
27~4e20~662~6 6 '
568.01 ^
|'
' -' ------
------------- ---
^^°-cwo '
12 6562 .
04/Z3/85
5**.50- -__--RVpnnw_n�orm-
xo
!'
612~*62~66 '-_--
»*n.so °
..
|
126593
`a*5v3
,aa5v3
,z6sv3
-- ' -
vaox9*
|
"
C |
^
owawos
3000
nImmconr^
cLxv
zwxcmTnnn
'23~120�~000~00 r
.
u*v23/85 ___
___ s°°r5mINwcsn7«_
05v01/85
CLAY ___�______cmopr_ouppLz
mcnsILm* arccL pwru
23~*588~611~*1 ___
1u6 613
owsumx
197.45
~
prwwcsnro
c��x
on�pr supp��cu
23-4588-616-61 '
|.
112. 58___
u4/30v85
22.95
nzmwsaorx
cLor
cnxpT SoppLuco
ay~*swo~ava~mx |.
.
'-------- -------'-----�'---
�
- '---
------------------'--.|
u*119/85
39604"16
sromc pnoxr
mcmxzccm
10~422*~504~50
.
3960 .1
|
126612
04/e3/85
1*7.90
nzomcnr xnpoxLr CORP scm mwppLxcw
40~4504~803~80
^_
147°90
°
muovo
05v01/85
273.89
mcnsILm* arccL pwru
10~*620~560~56
1u6 613
oU4/23/85
119~00
wcwczLuu urccL sex ouppLIcn
40 45 0*~801 o~o
__l aho13� ____-_-
112. 58___
_~--_�__-- _
.~�-�
505.47
°
~�.
/
^~ �o*ru, u*xvv/ny r �,s
| ^ ^ sn exw
^w . 126702 04m9/85 3,520.10 L^mmm REcuTxnmu Amso
w
�
-- —'-------
`
- ---' ----
`
°°°-cKn
�
CONST 10-1458-000-00
0
ige 1 Y
OF EDINA
CHEC.
GISTER
05-01-
PAGE 17
C H EC K _N 0 @__D
AJE._
AM OUIN I-.-
_VLm a I
- ITEM DE-SX8.101TON
_ACCjMUN_T_NO- INV.—#_ P*O.—#--MESSAGE--
39520910
1267U3
04/19/85
2,105.00
NINE MILE CREEK
NINE MILE CREEK
10-2248-000-00
29105.00
*
!7
126104
J4/19/85
200.00
LES 4NOYNG
WAGES
10-4200-646-64
20•. 1D.
*
126/05
J4/19/85
203.07
VORILLA; COMP
INVEN SUPPLIES
23-1209-000-00
126706
04/19/85
100.00.
BURr_AU OF NATL
DUES
10-4204-140-14
100.00
12670,7
04/19/85
717.25
WM J BERQUIST
CONT SERV
10-4200-140-14
717.25
12670
J4/19/85
120*00
PTAC
INVESTIGATION
10-4202-421-42
120.00
1271
126709
J.4/19/85
60,00
ATOM
CONFERENCE
10- 4202 - 421 -42
60.30
126710
04/19/85
35200
EXPLOR---,-R 20ST 911
CONFERENCE
10-4202-421-42
352.30
126711
U4/19/85
115e00
METRO SAL94GE & TOW EQUIP MAIhT
10-4274-421-42
115.00
126712
04/19/85
150*03
MN DEPT OF PUBLIC
TELETYPE.SERV
10-4268-420-42
126113
04/19f85
15.00
BERQUIST CO
LIC REFUND
10-3056-000-00
!4 -
15.00
126f14
04/19/85
6.53
ALL FIRE TEST CO
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248"449-44
6.50
126715
04/19/F5
21.95
GENERAL ELECTRIC
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 446 -44
126715
04/19/85
13*00
GENERAL ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-446-44
5 9
A. 5
126116
04/19/85
45*00.
KAREN KUNZMAN
CLASS REFUND ART CTR
23-3500-000-00
126717
04/19/85
45.00
DIANE RILBRATH
CLASS REFUND ART CTR
23-3500-000-00
126718
04/19/85
18.00
PERCY BAROTT
REFUND ART CENTER
23- 3500 - 000 -00
126719
0,4/19/85
45.00
DONNA HAMILTON
REFUND ART CENTER
23-3500-000-00
45-0-0
i75
126720
04/19/85
45*00
JOHN TSAKSEN
CLASS REFUND ART CTR
23-3500-000-00
0
1965 CITY
OF EDINA
04/23/85
CHECK REGISTER
RC IDENTIFICATION
05 -01 -85 PAGE 18
10- 4200 - 440 -44
CHECK
DATE
AMOUNT_
VEN00R
IL M DESCRIPTION
ACLU- N"O_+�NV. P.O._p_MESSAGE -
- -.RC IDENTI°ICAT ?ON_
- GEN - SUPPLIES
-- - --
-# - -__
Tz
v
RC IDEVTIFIICATION
45.00 •
10- 4504 - 420 -42
13
4
126121
U4/19/85
10.80
COUIIER O!SPATCH
CONT SERV
10- 4200- 100 -10
10.40 •
04/30/85_ _ __ _
.__ _ -__ 2.00_ ---
_RC IDENTIFICATION. -__
'
126722
04/19/85
37.68 -
PERKIES INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
2.00
RC IDENTIFICATTON
GEN SUPPLIES
37.68 •
126(23
U4/19/85
107.86
WM 8 TURNER
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 842 -84
j<
126126
107.86 +
110.00
EBERHARDT MGMT
REFUND POOL LIC
10 -3060- 000 -00
1267/-4
04/19/85
6.58
C C SHA °BROW CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
126724
04/30/85
41.59
C C SMARR)W CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
U4/19/85
810.00
TESSMAN SEED B CREM
48.17 +
10- 4536 - 353 -30
126725
04/23/85
4.00
RC IDENTIFICATION
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 440 -44
126125
_ o4/30/R5 ______---
__4.00__
- -.RC IDENTI°ICAT ?ON_
- GEN - SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 140 -14-
126725
04/19/85
9.44
RC IDEVTIFIICATION
GEV SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
126125
U4/19/85
2.36
RC IDEENTIFICATION
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
126125
04/30/85_ _ __ _
.__ _ -__ 2.00_ ---
_RC IDENTIFICATION. -__
- GEN_SUPPIIES
10 -4504- 490- 49 - -,.-
126725
04/30/85
2.00
RC IDENTIFICATTON
GEN SUPPLIES
50 -4504- 840 -84
23.36 •
126126
U4/19/85
110.00
EBERHARDT MGMT
REFUND POOL LIC
10 -3060- 000 -00
i=
!'I
126727
U4/19/85
810.00
TESSMAN SEED B CREM
WEARING SHOES
10- 4536 - 353 -30
126727
04/19/85
810.30-
TESSMAN SEED 8 CHEM
CORRECTION
10- 4536 - 353 -30
126127
u4/19/85
810.40-
TESSMAN SEED. -K CHEM
CORK- ECTION
10- 4568- 353- 30_- _.- .
126127
U4/19/85
F10900
TESSMAN SEED B CHEM
SEED
-__._
10 -4568- 353 -30
126727
04/19/85
810.00
TESSMAN SEED 8 CHEM
SEED
'10- 4568- 642 -64
126727
_ _U4 /19/85
- ____ -- _ 856.00_
TESS�AnLS.__D- B�H�PI_-
-SEED
10- 45.68.- 642- .64__ -..
1.666.00 •
v
126728
_ 04/19/85
64.17
CeROLE- KULAK
MILEAGE
27 -4208- 660 -66 - -- -
i
- -- -- L
I -
126728
04/19/85
64.17-
CAROLE KULAK
CORRECTION
27- 4208- 667 -66
126728
04/19/85
64.17
CAROLE KU -AK
MILEAGE
27- 4208- 667 -66
- -
-- - - --
-- - -64.1 7__•
II
126729
04/19/85
472.00
BUREAU OF NATL
DUES
10- 4204- 140 -14
-
126730,
04/19/85
108.00
PUBLIC RISK 8 INS
MEMBERSHIP
10- 4204 - 140 -14
108.00 •
126131
04/19/85
174.85
YEROK CDR?
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 510 -51
dry:
1 14.8 5 •
_
lo<
126732
04/23/85
500.0
FIRE INST ASSN OF MN
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 440 -44
- -- -
- - - -- -500.0 0-- •
126733
J4/23/85
55.00
DATREY MARKETING
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 440 -44
,•._
55.70 •
�.
126734
(14/23/85
12600
JOSEPH TERESI
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
y`
v
1965 iY OF EDINA
CHECK _GISTER
05 -D1 PAGE 19
126745 _--.0412.31_85 - -_- _25.00 UM R FECK $CHDDL R -CANE
25.00 *
._.12.6746_____ - _.-.04_/23/_.85 26..56..* 1 D_UI3__& RA.MAM Mtl rfirE 40-4 248 0.6-
26.56 *
126747 ___._ -.
_CH!ECK__NO.._-DATE___
-.___ _1 .OD_
- A�OUNI_
V NDD�_- ii E_M_DES.CRTPTIeN
ACCD_UNT_NO.__LNV.-A__P,.O. -I
.MESSAGE
116747
14/23/85
100000
GERALD 3RIMACOMBE
INSTRUCTCR FEE
23 -4100- 614 -61
" I
126747
04/23/85
126.20 +
GERALD BRIMACOMBE
CORRECTION
is
c�
'
126735
04/23/85
25.00
WILD MOUNTAIN DISCOUNT PRICE
10 -4504- 624 -62
cl
I _'
. -- -
25.00 +
! 126748
04/23/85
54.00
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
WAGES
23- 4200 - 610 -61
126736
94/23/85
28.00
DONS APPLIANCE &`TV CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 446 -44
_ -_ -_
-- - -- -
126736
04/23/85
9.95
DONS A.aPLIANCE & TV REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 446 -44
23- 3410 - 000 -00
'
__ ..1267.49-- _..____-
_041Z31_85.
37..95.. *_
- ELORE3__SCNMETnri
- - - -- -- -- --
- - - -- - - --
- -__ ._-------- -- - - --
126737
04/24/85
4.76
RADIO SHAC'K CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
126137 --
__ -- _04/23/85-__-.-___9.48
R. ADID._SHA.CK- .- _____- __CABLE__T_V-
126737
04/23/85
24.95
RADIO SHACK LAMPS 6 FIXTURES
27.4606- 661 -66
126737
04/26/85
24.95-
RADIO SMACK CORRECTION
27 -4606- 661 -66
;fl
126737
04/24/85 - -
- -__ _24.95__.
RADIO -SHACK_ --. -- -PARIS
27_46.20- 660- .66 - -_ _ -_ ---
----- - -._.-
39.19 +
_- 12.6738_._
- - 04>23C8.5
-.-- 340..70_ TB.M __GEN SUPPLIES
1D- 450- 4:-510 -.51
340.00
J
2T
''
L.iI
_126739
___ _- __U4/_23./_85__.
--12
__NELSJILRAOI_D_C.OMM- REPAIR PARTS
10 -4560 560-56 - -- -- -
-- -- -.-
127.00 *
J
___126740
- _04./21_L85
.-43.54 r,M STEWALRL_LUMRCR &EN Super TFS
10-45Oti.305 -30_
43.54 *
126741_______.__0.4
/22/.85-
2.945.25
ME.T_R0 MASIE BLDG PERMITS
104.95- 0DO.�DD____...
•i'
____
--
2,945.25
- _CDYTROL
I __.._-
.]26Z42__041.22./__8`�_
--
62..6.2
DICK_RLZC)L_____ GEN__S_UPP_ITES
1D -45 4- 6.46 -6_4
-- .- - - --
"j
62.62
126143_
____9._4/227.85_ -.-
JI". A1'_CH_SALES_L.O_. GFN SUPPLLES
10 -4504- 301 -30 --
105.99 •
___ 1267.44
-- U.4.1 23/__85_-
.___3 7 e.8 D_
yCY,S ERIC E .- PARIS_
10- 4b2D -- 5.6.0 _56
37.80 •
`:�
126745 _--.0412.31_85 - -_- _25.00 UM R FECK $CHDDL R -CANE
25.00 *
._.12.6746_____ - _.-.04_/23/_.85 26..56..* 1 D_UI3__& RA.MAM Mtl rfirE 40-4 248 0.6-
26.56 *
126747 ___._ -.
4 /23/8.5 -_
-.___ _1 .OD_
GERALD- BRIMACOMBE_
INSTRUCTOR FEE
i
116747
14/23/85
100000
GERALD 3RIMACOMBE
INSTRUCTCR FEE
23 -4100- 614 -61
126747
04/23/85
1.0.0•
GERALD BRIMACOMBE
CORRECTION
23 -4100- 614 -61
c�
'
� �''L -• - - -- - - - --
--
1.0.0_.90 -+
I _'
. -- -
! 126748
04/23/85
54.00
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
WAGES
23- 4200 - 610 -61
�: - -- - - - -- -
- - - -- - -- -
54_..00 -*
-
_ -_ -_
-- - -- -
I
' 126744
yle
04/23/85
20.00
DELORES SCHMEIDEL
REFUND
23- 3410 - 000 -00
__ ..1267.49-- _..____-
_041Z31_85.
4-...D-D.-
- ELORE3__SCNMETnri
CLERICAL CHARGE
23- 3900--Q00 -00
16.00
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER 05 -01 -85
PAGE 20
CHECK _NC._-
DATE._________ `AMOUNT
^- V4N00P,_ -__- I_IE_M D�S- ON ACC9UN.T_10•__INV"._P.O. -#-MESSAGE---
I
y 125851
04/23/85
_585 .DO
WALKER ENTERPRISE -_
-- __PRINTING.
10- 4600 - 500 -50
126751
04/23/85
45.70
UPT04 ADV= RTISING-
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82
125151
04/Z3/P5
45.00
UPTON ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 842 -84
126.751 _ ._
04123/E5___ --
45.00
f 28 o ? B-�
_ -- U.PTOJ�L ADVERTISING
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 -
v' 125752 _
_04/23/8`.__ _____ -
___ -. 28.50_
- tOL,L= EN?AULUS -_
_ -MEHA ANNUAL
10- 4202_.480- 4.8____
28.50
126753
.04/23/85
_ 19.00
____- _DAVI_)__4 YELDE__,_ -- _.!_
ME4AA ANNUAL
10 -4202- 480- 48__
-._
125 754
04/23/85
19.00
____ _E.ARL_M.E ICHSNER - -__ -_
_ -__ MECtl MEEZIDIG
10�42C2- 482- 48____
_
19.0
+
126755 _
04/23/85
695.52
_ _ OEZURI_K___ -_
REPAIR PARTS
40-4540- _805 -80_
695.52
•
126756 _
- J4/24/85 _ -- _._____
_ -__ 175.50
_ _ -___ _PARK_NICOLLET_MED_
-- PHr -E.KAM-
175.50
!
126757
- 04/23/P5.____- -____.
- 10.4 -4
-- H -ARCS MAC_NCO
G.E_N__3_UPPLIES
10- 4504- 6-4_6 -64
70.44
126758
04/2b/85
_29007.93
_ _PE000_RENTALS INC__
__CWT__i.EPAI.RS 10m4_2_48- 560- 56_ - - -_ -
- - -
29007.93
•
125759
- -- -
_
722.60_
KE_Y__C_AQ_ILJ._AC
C.2N_LEPAI
10= X2_48 = X60 -56
- - - - -
- - - - --
72203
*
126760
:)4/Z3/95 _
307.20__-
__ZIP_PENN- ______ - -__.
_TOOLS
10- 4.580--353- 30____
307.20
126761,
04/26/85
_639.30
LAN)3CA,PE_BTURF
S00_BLAC1�(ZIRT
27 -4562- 662 -66 _.______._________I•
126761
04/23/85
19013.30
LANDSCAPE B TURF
PARTS
27- 4620- 662 -66
"l
19652.30
+
126762
04/23/85
540.00
CHRISTA;IN EROS COMP
REMOVE TREES
10- 4200 - 353 -30
.,,
540 .10
*
126763
04/Z3/85
- --
62.37
EBERHARDT CO
OYERPATMEhT
40- 3525 - 000 -00
62.37
*
125764
04/23/85
259.53
F•8 E SALES SERVICE
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 500 -50
259.50
*
- -_ - - --.__ -. -_.
126765
4 ----
04/23/85
198.40
VIDE) IMAGES
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
198.40
*
126166
04/23/85
155.33
GOVT FINANCE
DUES
10- 4204 - 160 -16
155.00
•
I::I
i' 126767
04/23/8!
^ 12.91
POPULAR COMPUTING
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
12.97
+
^
1935 _n or coIwA cwEcu ..c-ozorcn 05~01~u^ Pxsc av
�
°_zmn°-m_p°o°_m-nc�s�
�
|,
__coccK-mQ°_o4Ic
- -�� ���
.
|^
�
126758 _-
04v23485
zo,.nn_--____nxn�
x~��_---
|
znv.00 °
c
..|`
'
--_°.,^"---_--°,�
~.'..~
._-_-___-__'__-___'-_
..
arn"/U °
[
.
7
.
126xrQ.
J�4zs/-o5-______--__1s�°J�_
150,00
/.
-lcerr1_--�4/2-3��s________-_599"91.-___---L
/.'
�pn°pv
�
126773
0*/24/85
*n°uu uumxm nonnc
wn'cp cmrnv
10~2149~000~00
'i
_1aurr3__---_o�
c°uV __-__-_Wo
UO��O
�'
62.80
'-',a6rr4._-'_-o*/zA/u5�pn.�m
a�_zam�
U-oV-_-_''-
_- - --
||
195.00 °
- �--
--126.7-75-_-'--J-4/2-418
a°
oson-__-__-___-__---___._'�j
.
26°14 °
.�
.1amrrw_-'_u4va4/os_'_-'__��-_na.
uauxoom_o
mo�m�a-a�__'---
so~r5 °
,
/
�
COPY DURLI-CAT-ING
GEN—SURP-LIES
10!-4504-540!-
126779
04/24/85
67o5O COPY DUPLICATING
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-540-54
a*1z
`
126780
04/24/85
45.25 SCHAFER EQUIP Co
TOOLS
10-4580-301-30
45.25
^
ss ao EDWAID LACELLO
ROTO TILLER RENTAL
10-4504-390-30
0.4/24/85
10 .64.
10-4160-510-51
c I
�
�--
126783
04x24/85
S°z5 wccn--Mo Fnccoon
no"xzm Pxnrm
27~4540~*63~6e
'
!..
126784
0.4v2*v85
7*9.51 zon
cmuzp RENTAL
10~4226~510~51
`
�a�re�
o�xa*vns
a�°om �pn ornm� r�o�ua�
P�a�a
��~�a�8~aa�~a�
^`
w
��
�
vpmn czrv n.= snzwA
_noccn mo°_oAIE__
_
-
A.M OU-N.T-���
a*°ao °
coccn ncsznrcm os~nv~ms p«sc ua
VENDOR
/
'
ww°_w-P°m° --- o_ncss AGE ---
°°°~cwo
i7|
_ ma/ur .
_g4va6vu5
103.9
�uonzco-
oNJ B��&�
m�4z�o_�Vo~ro_____ !
Iu68uu
�./
126787
u4/26v85
241.55
mw rxnuxco
cnm7 Rspxxnm
28~4248~708~70 - r
� �-��—�����
u�xa*vns
-
RADIO EQUIP
345°*9
126788
uW26/85
501.35
pxn zmmrour pxImrs
pnzmrzms
10~4600~627~62 - - --
-
501°35
126789
04/2*/85
4*°00
xoxxwwc xaer
ccxon ncruxo
23~3500~000~00 ------
M.A*WsP
- �
10-4202-421-42
44.00
12679c
- '
04x26/95
- ----
29921 04
- ------ '------'—
rnopzc mzmoo
--'-
osm SuppLzco
'--- --- -- �|
26~*504~688~68 .
|
- �
29 821°0 4
0000 TECH41CAL
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-420-42
-�zur��
- -a*x�o���-----------�,6
577.50
Mr-NN CTY TREASURER
����
Boe' nnucrI
------------�
�
165.00
59*50
THE PRINT SHOP
/ 126792
n4/26ve5
62.50
mrp^
ncnacouxzp
10~*20*~**0-**
_
__,__
12679P3
04/26v85
oax°zo
acxcmm pn3m CO
ncu suppLxcS��-�
10~*504~642~6* -----�---------/
~-
sam �m °
°
/ -
126794
u4v26v85
10-4204-600-60
. �
25"30 ^
�
'_
126795
_-__
o*x2ava»
8"92*.ro
10-2 240~000~00 - /
*vLwmo owz AREA
anz LEmooma
-
'
ovvoo.no
-
- -----'-----
--------'----------
----------'---
----�� --- ^1
'-126191 r-----U*'/26/85------
~
HILB
126798
~
- --
u*vauxoo
�1
-- ----
12uxvv ------
� '
---------
u4�c6vn»
Iu68uu
�./
04/26v85
/ 126801
0.4/26x85
/ -
126802
`j
~i
-- -------'--
u*/ao/ux
12-6 8n3
� �-��—�����
u�xa*vns
�
�
, --_
'
113.66
HILB
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23-1209-000-00
.'
DOYLE LOCK C 0
10-4914-420-42
RADIO EQUIP
59 .90
45.0.0
M.A*WsP
SPRING CCAIFERENCE
10-4202-421-42
55.00
0000 TECH41CAL
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-420-42
577.50
Mr-NN CTY TREASURER
RADIO EQUIP
10-4914-420-42
59*50
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
10-4600-420-42
1901 Y
OF EDINA
PAM II L
CHECK
GISTER
05-01 PAGE 23
126817
CHECK
126817
U.4/30/85
v E�R�OQ4
ITEM LJ)ts_c R r P T r a
AC-COLUNT-NO e-I N V a_J_P.* 0 M E S S AGE.—
J EANING ART CIR 71m,4200_-61_0-61
—50-4214-822-82
20*30
MN
200.00
ADVERTISING
50-4214-842-84
.,--.126815----.U4/3U./85---.--346..22-
MN
___12680.4__.
B LACX-10p 10-4532-301-30
50-4214-862-86
____MP_kL_I_ND_U_S_TRlE.S___
_GU_lP PAINT
10- _4.214-420- .4- 2— __- .___- ._ -__.
GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-803-80
44.35
•
126816
04/30/85
55*28 MARILYN MUELLER
LICENSE PROCESSING 10-4200- 500- 50
55.28 •
12 6 80.5 ______0_4
/Z6/
_578.46
__S_H EW F S_
—PDQM & B ARD
10 -42 6 -22D_22
570.46
126806
_U4f26f8_5______.__
—1 7*50____._A_UTo_s.QU_Na
----EQUIP HATNT
17.50
1268C?--
105*00---AM.-LU43-ASSDC--------SUB-Sir-HIP-TION
_10 �_4.202 m420 -t4 2
105.00
UNI-EnRM Al I nU
10- 4266- 422-42
149.95
____402
*O0lZ.RSaB_EN___
rn NY SERV
402.00
*
__04/30_/85____
--9o-92
RMS _3_EF_U_E_ST_Of _S_
10-A_2_48.-_520w_52____
9.92
*
------
A_RELkRA_aUB D T R P A Y M E N I
40- 3525_-D0.0mt(Ln
27.00
•
12 6 6 1 2____
__0 4 /.30 1.85
_165.00.
.1:D -LNL EMPL a YEE S-CLU B S UP. P L I r q
1 nn450_4_50 0-5 0___
165.00
".._._- .126813
- 04-/30 »5__ -
PAM II L
A MM UNI=N 29 --4-M ---? 2- 0ml 2-
126817.-
_____..04/30/8_5
126817
2,052.13
126817
U.4/30/85
__126 814
04/30/85
__.__20 0 .3D-- R0Hi08LDYIAK
J EANING ART CIR 71m,4200_-61_0-61
—50-4214-822-82
20*30
MN
200.00
ADVERTISING
50-4214-842-84
.,--.126815----.U4/3U./85---.--346..22-
MN
En KIA.EME1 A-S.ONS
B LACX-10p 10-4532-301-30
50-4214-862-86
126815
04/30/85
363*77 ED KRAEMEI & SONS
GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-803-80
709.99
126816
04/30/85
55*28 MARILYN MUELLER
LICENSE PROCESSING 10-4200- 500- 50
55.28 •
126817
(14/30/85
126817
04/30/85
126817.-
_____..04/30/8_5
126817
04/30/E5
126817
U.4/30/85
126818
04/30/85
126819
04/30/85
15*00•
MN
JAYCEES
CORRECTICN
10-4214-822-82
1503
MN
JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
10-4214-822-82
__.__15.c0__MN_JkYCEE_S
_ADV_ERT.IS_IJXG
—50-4214-822-82
20*30
MN
JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
50-4214-842-84
20*00
MN
JA;YC-7ES
ADVERTISING
50-4214-862-86
CC nn
90.43 RV ASSOC GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-520-52
2,530.1D SOUTAERN T'"UMDER FIG SKATING 10-2235-000-00
7-nin in �
126820 04/30/85 37000 SECOA RENTALS FIG SKATING
10-2235-000-00
7 i
1985 czry
OF cnnxA
c*ccn ncsxorsm
os~n,~es pxsc 24
|
Cxccx]mn°_oArc__
mmY—mo°-zmw°_J-.e°o.-wncSoAsc__-�/
' va6uzn
04/30/85
86.50
SECOA RENTALS
FIG SKATm
10-2 2 35- 000-00
|
�,m »,
| '
.'/ 126821
!
p�. 2-4
`
_i x
v2aca
04 /3U
371.25
sncn LWSmMxm
nxmwc owppLzco
27~4637~663~66
`
vaaxuz
J4/3O/F5
2 9303.4*
oEorLImIE GOLF upLY
wxmsc muppLzco
27~4637~663~66
/
12662*
04v30/85
172°50
xrw I,Nc
zmSwxmcE
10~4260~510~51
�
—1y2 ,5 0_
126825
34o0/8 5
49.5o
cmrcc
xwxEm`nnv muppLzcn
23~1209~000~00
49~5.0*-
_ ,aouzo
04v3uv85
s,ouo.on
pourMxorsI
pnorxac
10~4290~510~51
'_-_--3 9 000.1o_�____________________________
_ 17
05/01/85
149836.74
`."^=� "^"""" °"C"
C°N^^nwC/Ivw
27-1300-000 -00
-
U5/01/85 —
43.60
'-^ ~'~'^ ~^^
^"VE~^~`,
10-4632-862 -86
~
_
- | ---
05/01/85
~'^~~
"~^^E" "°-~E"" ""°
'S^ AID SUPPLIES
10-4510-44a -44 / '
---3 3
_ 12 683u
05 /0.1/85
110.30
BE BE RcmacL
pnmp scRxzccs
�o~oaos~ou�~Po
|�
..
_ I e*o3n
05/01/85
23509
urn^xa noScoc
cnwu7xwcT/nm
e0~1 300~202~04
^
|
235.99
126832
__-..--
.`'.'~^.
"°.. ^~°^="~^~"
°c""ICE^
10 *2 20- 260-26
'
- | ----
~-'~''~'
'~°~~
" IF "
«E*/^/°»/zom
10-4202- 240-24
-
' �oa s�
� u
0,5/0t/85
118.95
sm^mm xzsw L000c
compcmcmcc
10~4202~240~24
-|
_ OLIVER
--..^-- -^.-.~
10-4 200-353-3"
.'.
'
126836 .
-''-./—
306*90
.~ ~...E ."^~"
dE"° ,cx°I/
10~+310~358~30
�
_
l
vuoxx/
osvunvon
103.53
ouuAw momnE
nmo
10-2149-030- 00
.- --_-_
IU3.50
'
- � 126839
ou/01xo5
17.50
ourm ouumovEm7mumzn
cuwT ncPxxno
10~4248~560~56
�
.~
^
yccncAvzmw ocmzsm Fumn
2
2,169.90 F
Fumo 29 TOTAL o
oum aAmoc Fmmo
v,aas° o
o_o 0_rnr« L W
.
puwo on TOTAL u
Ygc ,
OF cozm^
poxo so TOTAL L
LImuon ozoPcmsxnn FUND
cxsc. azo7sy
05~m~ pxsc an
'
[
cwccn_m
--- -'---'
--'-
mmx—mo°-Tmu°_m-e°p°
w-mcSs4ac
r-
<`
''~'~
'
"
126839
�
89.24
~
�
-
L
---- ----------------'---'----'-'
12684u
05/01/85
91 6.00
916 .OD
|
.
126841
o vul 5
59.31
~
� .
59.31
�
..
126842
05/01 /85
163 n
°.`
..~°~.
.
� ic
«
'
- -'---
vouum
--'-- -
oxvnm/nx
- -------------'----'--
r,uro.Jm
Joc mnucPwsm
uxmca
------'-
27~4100~675~66
�.'
r,oro°ao
! |
12684
'`
m
|
�
'
126845 ---0.5v01/n5�---'2^9r8.00—��--�cL'PAINT
pxzwr
10~45*4-335- 30
------`�
~,
29973.10
°
13`�
^°°~cmn |
�
1749In*"64
povn vo rorxL
ocmcnxL rumm
`
|
�
'o2°sn_-______Fumo_zo_rmrxL__-_____-
PARK. non
39261.77
pnwo on TOTAL
Apr ccmrcn
� !
� pmx o�
, ~
as.nwp'`r
ro:o eo rnm�
�wn rr rnr".
ouzwm�mo poo� puwo
�".r ,°"""� c,.m"
=�
|`|
../
,--__-_ ._-.''-.
3,737.18 p
povn 28 TOTAL y
yccncAvzmw ocmzsm Fumn
2
2,169.90 F
Fumo 29 TOTAL o
oum aAmoc Fmmo
v,aas° o
o_o 0_rnr« L W
WATER FUND
�
1 949166°28 p
puwo on TOTAL u
urzLz7v pumo
3
3,414.29 p
poxo so TOTAL L
LImuon ozoPcmsxnn FUND
L19
---------
' -
�J
|-/
!"
l
'
�1
8PFi%_oV[cD) FC,,rAYNENT
----------'---'----------- c��������� - -
--'-- ------- fE-�'---
--- --------- ^~~~^�~~�^~'--"�rc---------
�
�
�
�
�
|�|�