HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-06-17_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 17, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of May 6 and May 20, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -5
West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive -
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 to PRD -3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill
Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Foster Green Addition
C. Appeal from Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision - 4528 Bruce Avenue -
Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Insurance Renewals
B. Van - Utility Department
C. Administrative Vehicle
D. Community Center Parking Lot - Sprinkler Modification
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 11, 1985
B. Request for CDBG Participation - Woodhaven
C. Carson Gift of Land
D. Homart Development of France Avenue Theatre Site - Bloomington
E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Resolution Adopting a Program, and Giving Preliminary Approval to a Development
and its Financing, Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C and Authorizing
Submission of the Program to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for Review
and Approval
VII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of
the.following claims dated 6/17/85: General Fund $408,244.05, Working Capital
Fund $600.00, Park Fund $20.21, Art Center $2,351.78, Swimming Pool Fund $3,550.65,
Golf Course Fund $53,944.50, Recreation Center Fund $5,344.33, Gun Range Fund
$319.39, Water Fund $118.50, Utility Fund $221,189.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$115,766.97, Construction Fund $49,214.73, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $207,675.00,
Total $1,068,339.25; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 5/31/85:
General Fund $196,840.87, Art Center $386.09, Swimming Pool Fund $66.26, Golf
Course Fund $8,199.49, Recreation Center Fund $3,465.72, Gun Range Fund $75.61,
Utility Fund $2,590.89, Liquor Dispensary Fund $304,350.10, Total $515,975.03
(MEETINGS SCHEDULE - REVERSE SIDE)
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday
June
17
Special Council Meeting
- Update of
5:00
p.m.
Mgr. Conf. Rm.
Strategic Plan
Monday
June
17
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Monday
June
24
Edina Nite at Minnesota
Twins Game
Metrodome
(Buses leave lower parking lot at
Braemar at 5:00
p.m:)
Thurs
June
27
Ralph Lieber Roast
5 -7
p.m.
Interlachen C. Club
? Monday
July
1
Special Council Meeting
- Update of
5:00
p.m.
Mgr. Conf. Rm.
Capital Plan
Monday
July
1
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Sat
July
13
EDINAMITE 9:00 a.m to 4:00 p.m.
& 7:30 -11:00
p.m.
Wooddale School
Thurs
July
4
Independence Day - City
Hall Closed
Monday
July
15
Regular Council Meeting
7:OO
p.m.
Council Room
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 17, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of May 6 and May 20, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of
, seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -5
* West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four - fifths (4 /5),favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four- fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 to PRD -3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill
Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
* 1. Foster Green Addition
C. Appeal from Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision - 4528 Bruce Avenue -
* Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Insurance Renewals
* B. Van - Utility Department
* C. Administrative Vehicle
* D. Community Center Parking Lot - Sprinkler Modification
V. RECOMMENDATIONS.AND REPORTS
A. Tr"affic.Safety Committee Minutes of June 11, 1985
* B. Request for CDBG Participation - Woodhaven
C. Carson Gift of Land
* D. Homart Development of France Avenue Theatre Site - Bloomington
E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Resolution Adopting a Program,. and Giving Preliminary Approval to a Development
and its Financing, Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C and Authorizing
Submission of the Program.to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for Review
and Approval
VII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of
the.following claims dated 6/17/85: General Fund $408,244.05, Working Capital
Fund $600.00, Park Fund $20.21, Art Center $2,351.78, Swimming Pool Fund $3,550.65,
Golf Course Fund $53,944.50, Recreation Center Fund $5,344.33, Gun Range Fund
$319.39, Water Fund $118.50, Utility Fund $221,189.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$115,766.97, Construction Fund $49,214.73, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $207,675.00,
Total $1,068,339.25
(MEETINGS SCHEDULE - REVERSE SIDE)
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday
June
17
Special Council Meeting
- Update of
5:00
p.m.
Mgr. Conf. Rm.
Strategic Plan
.Monday
June
17
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Monday
June
24
Edina Nite at Minnesota
Twins Game
Metrodome
(Buses leave lower parking lot at
Braemar at 5:00 p.m.)
Thurs
June
27
Ralph Lieber Roast
5 -7
p.m.
Interlachen C. Club
? Monday
July
1
Special Council Meeting
- Update.of
5:00
p.m.
Mgr. Conf. Rm.
Capital Plan
Monday
July
1
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
Sat
July
13
EDINAMITE 9:00 a.m
to 4:00 p.m.
& 7:30 -11:00
p.m.
Wooddale School
Thurs
July
4
Independence Day - City
Hall Closed
Monday
July
15
Regular Council Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council Room
,J
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 6, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MINUTES of.the.Regular Council Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, were
approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 2, STOW'S EDGEMOOR. Planner Craig Larsen
presented a petition for division of Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor, generally
located east of Lynmar Lane and north of Mavelle Drive. The applicants are re-
questing a party -wall division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility
connections are provided.. A non - conforming three -car garage is located on the south-
erly portion of the site. Mr. Larsen advised that the proposed split satisfies all
conditions for a party -wall subdivision established in the Zoning Ordinance. However,
since all the garages will be located on one lot, garage access easements will be
needed. Staff would recommend approval of the division. No objection being heard,
Member Bredesen-introduced the following resolution and.moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate .
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
The North 47.3 feet, front and rear of Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor
Addition; and
Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, except the North 47.3 feet, front
and rear, of said Lot 6;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Kelly, setting May 20, 1985, as hearing date for the
following planning matters:
1) PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located in the
northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street
2) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems - generally
located.west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street
3) R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District, generally
located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue
4) Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert - 7010
France Avenue So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor
Addition
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS (METRO BLVD /70TH & METRO BLVD / EDINA
INDUSTRIAL BLVD 485 -2 ENG). Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for two traffic
control signal systems (Metro Blvd /70th Street and Metro Blvd /Edina Industrial Blvd)
showing Ridgedale Electric at $137,190.00, Egan McKay Electrical Contractors, Inc.
at $141,340.00, Killmer Electric Company, Inc. at $154,201.00 and Hoffman Electric
at $154,662.75. Engineer Hoffman advised that the project.will be turned in for State
Aid funding. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid
to recommended low bidder, Ridgedale Electric, at $137,190.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
5/6/85
BIDS AWARDED FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (BA -263, P -14, P -15 AND VARIOUS PARK
PROJECTS ( #85 -3 & 485 -4 ENG). Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Contract
#85 -3 (Eng) - School Parking Lots, Arthur Street and W. 492 Street as follows:
Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $138,607.68, Hardrives, Inc. at $151,466.35 and Midwest
Asphalt Corporation at $154,998.78. Bids for Contract X685 -4 (Eng) - Arneson Park
and Playground Rings were as follows: Gunderson Brothers at $34,366.00, Standard
Sidewalk at $41,502.50, Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $42,618.80, Victor Carlson & Sons,
Inc. at $46,395.70 and Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $57,796.50. Motion of Member
Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bids to recommended low bidders,
Contract #85 -3 to Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $138,607.68 and Contract $85 -4 to Gunder-
son Brothers at $34,366.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BIDS AWARDED FOR WEED HARVESTING OF MILL POND AND MIRROR LAKE. Mr. Rosland advised
that there was only one bidder for weed harvesting of the Mill Pond and Mirror Lake
and that Midwest Aqua Care has done a good job for the City the past several years.
Bids submitted by Midwest Aqua Care were $9,120.00 for the Mill Pond and $4,930.00
for Mirror Lake. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award
of bids to Midwest Aqua Care at $9,120.00 /Mill Pond and $4,930.00 /Mirror Lake.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of.quotes
for one 1984 Chevrolet Citation II, 4 -door hatchback showing Iten Chevrolet, Brooklyn
Center at $8,194.00, Harold Chevrolet, Bloomington at $8,584.00 and Nelson - Lenzen
Chevrolet, Buick at $9,210.00. The vehicle will replace a Park & Recreation Depart-
ment vehicle. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by.Member Turner for award of
bid to recommended low bidder, Iten Chevrolet at $8,194.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIO BASE .STATION. Mr. Rosland advised that the
main base radio was inoperable during and following lightning activity in the
month of February and that replacement of the radio base station was included in
the capital budget for Police /Fire Departments. Tabulations of bids showed General
Communications, Inc. at $12,247.00 and Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc.
at $12,428.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid
to recommended low bidder, General Communications, Inc. at $12,247.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE /POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
INSURANCE. Mr. Rosland advised that as of May 24, 1985, Home Insurance intends
to discontinue the Police Professional Insurance coverage currently covered under
the City's General Liability Insurance. In an effort to find premiums that were
reasonable for both the Police and the Public Officials Liability, it was necessary
to quote both coverages together. The Markel Service was willing to write the
Public Officials Liability as long as they could also write the Police Professional
Liability. Other companies that were solicited to submit bids were not willing to
write Public Officials Liability, or those who did quoted prices that were much
higher. Because of the difficulty in acquiring the Public Officials Liability,
staff is recommending that we award the bid for both coverages to Markel Service.
Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to Markel
Service, Inc. at $6,600.00 for Public Officials Liability Insurance and at
$15,150.00 for Police Professional Insurance.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED REQUESTING CHANGE OF USE TO OPEN SPACE FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 3,
CROCKER & CROWELLS FIRST ADDITION. Mr. Rosland.recalled that at the meeting of
April 15, 1985, the Council had held over the matter of the request for release
of Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition in response to the neighbors
in the surrounding area who asked that it be retained for open space instead of
returning it to the State of Minnesota to be placed of sale. This tax - forfeited
parcel had been acquired originally by the Village of Morningside in 1943 for
drainage purposes and is no longer needed for those purposes. Donald Giese,
4232 Oakdale Avenue So., stated he represented the concerned citizens surrounding
the subject property. Mr. Giese presented a petition signed by approximately
178 persons requesting the Council to: 1) deny permission for any development of
the property, and 2) to maintain the property as open space. Dr. Bert Stromberg,
4219 Oakdale Avenue So., made a brief graphic presentation to further emphasize
their united concern that it be retained as open space. Following discussion,
Attorney Erickson explained that the statute provides that if tax - forfeited land -
that has been conveyed to a municipality for a specific purpose is no longer
5/6/85
being used for that purpose the State can take affirmative action to take the land
back. The City can seek to change the purpose for which it was received by making
application for approval of a new use of tax - forfeited lands and the State may or
may.not approve it. Member Bredesen commented that he felt this parcel is dif-
ferent from other undeveloped property because it is now publicly owned and that-..a
request for change of use to open space would be a continuation of public ownership
which is now in existence. Member Bredesen then offered the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Village of Morning side (by annexation now City of Edina) on August 6,
1943, received a conveyance of tax forfeited lands from the State of Minnesota,
conveying to it for drainage purposes a tract of land described as follows:
Lot eight (8), Block three (3), Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to
the Village of Morningside; and,
WHEREAS, the above described property is no longer needed for drainage purposes but
is desired by the City for open space purposes;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that an
application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation, to change
the use of the land above described from drainage purposes to open space purposes.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PLAN APPROVED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT OF CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY RAMP. Engineer
Hoffman recalled that at the meeting of April 15, 1985, the Council had given concept
approval of the Hennepin County's proposed plan for improvement of the eastbound ramp
from T.H. 100 to Crosstown 62, with the contingency that the County provide additional
safety information and options to the City Engineer to be brought back to the Council
together with possible options for resolving the noise issue. Mr. Hoffman stated
that he had met twice with County staff since then and that the County had agreed to
construct a guard rail to protect the Murphy and Stang residences, which are the two
homes adjacent to the ramp. Additionally, the County will purchase any City right of
way, if needed, for construction of the improvement. Mr. Hoffman reiterated staff's
recommendation that the Council should consider constructing a six foot privacy fence
inside the guard rail along the Murphy and Stang homes. The County will.also construct
the necessary cul -de -sacs on Parnell Avenue and West Shore Drive. Attorney Erickson
advised that it may be necessary to exchange easements between the City and Hennepin
County when actual ownership of the land on which the improvement is to be constructed
is determined. There being no further discussion, Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided plans and specifications for the improvement
of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 and seeks the
approval thereof; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed improvement Hennepin County has agreed to
construct a guard rail adjacent to the Murphy and Stang homes; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to purchase from the City any right of way if
needed for the proposed project and to provide $3,000 for use for City roadways;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans for the improvement of the ramp from
northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 be and are hereby approved, sub-
ject to an exchange of easements between--the City--and Hennepin County as necessary.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
With regard to the noise issue that was raised by the neighbors in the surrounding
area, Mr. Hoffman said that he had been in contact with the staff of the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency as to their opinion on a sound barrier wall. The PCA staff
commented that a sound barrier wall in that location would be effective only for the
homes immediately adjacent to the wall and that the effect would be greatly diminished
beyond the first three homes. They stated further that the .amount of traffic using
the ramp is relatively small and has_little:�impact,,.over the:_noise J rom the.Crosstown
Highway traffic averaging 64,000 vehicles per day. Member Turner commented that the
noise abatement issue is a long term issue that the Council should address, that the
strategic plan is to protect the.residential nature of the community and the volume
of traffic on the Crosstown Highway does impact the residential character of the
community -and that..ultimately _ the__Council_.should express-that concern to the County,
State or Federal authorities. No action was taken on the noise abatement issue.
CDPC RESOLUTION REGARDING PROPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT OF FRANCE AVENUE THEATRE SITE
IN BLOOMINGTON ENDORSED. Mr. Rosland advised that the Community Development and
Planning Commission at a recent meeting had drafted a resolution with regard to
the proposed Homar.t Development of the France Avenue Theatre site in Bloomington
and its impact on the City of Edina. In..the resolution the Commission had recommended
that all appropriate steps be taken to effect a reduction of the proposed development.
5/6/85
Mr. Rosland then presented total office square feet for the three basic office
areas in Edina and in summary noted that the total square feet of office space in
the City is approximately 4.2 million and that the proposed Homart Development is
approximately 33% of the total office space in Edina. Staff would recommend that
the Council pass the resolution on to the Bloomington City Council with a request
that the respective Councils meet jointly at the earliest convenience to discuss
the potential effects of this project on Edina. Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby endorses
the following resolution as adopted by the Community Development and Planning
Commission:
"WHEREAS, there currently exists in the area of France Avenue and I -494 traffic
congestion at peak hours; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Homart office -hotel development is to be developed on the
Edina side of I -494; and
WHEREAS, the Homart development would be three times as intense as-a similar
development in Edina; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development would negatively impact people living and work-
ing in the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development and Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council that all appropriate steps be taken to
effect a reduction in the intensity of this proposed development."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby seeks to meet with-the
Bloomington City Council to discuss.this proposed development.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REPORT GIVEN ON W. 70TH STREET /CORNELIA.DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. Mr. Hoffman reported
that the Minnesota Traffic Engineering Section has approved the justification report
prepared by .the consulting firm of Strgar- Roscoe, Inc. on the traffic signal for
W. 70th Street and Cornelia Drive and have concluded that the signal is warranted
and could be funded one -half from State Aid Funds. He pointed out that traffic
signals are funded on a leg entry basis and because two other legs are involved
only one -half of .the project could be so funded. Highest estimated signal cost is
$60,000 plus approximately $10,000 for design and supervision of the project. The
cost to the City would be approximately $35,000 to be covered from contingency funds
or through some other mechanism. Member Bredesen stated he was concerned about
using contingency funds for the traffic signal and suggested that we look elsewhere
to see if we could cut back on other expenditures to meet this cost. Member Kelly
made a motion to proceed with the installation of the traffic signal and to ask the
School District to participate in the cost. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Discussion followed and Member Richards commented that the decision for the traffic
signal was based on the assumption that the monies would come from State Aid funds;
that during the hearing process the question of financing the project was raised
and that the Council should first hear from the School and the area residents and
consider other options for.funding the.cost. Member Kelly then withdrew the motion.
Mr. Hoffman stated he would being back more information as to funding options and
would contact the School as to their participation. No action was taken.
POLICY ON SALE OF PARK PROPERTY DISCUSSED.. Mr: Rosland stated that from time to
time citizens contact.staff about possible sale of City owned land and would like
the- "Council to develop a policy, whether it is park property or some other City
owned land that staff might consider surplus land, in dealing with such requests.
Suggested procedure would be to notify everyone within a chosen radius, e.g. 350 ft.,
that such land may possibly be sold and then hold a public hearing on the matter.
Member Richards stated he could not support any kind of policy that would dispose
of any park property. Member Bredesen suggested that a general, broad policy be
established to not sell park land and to consider a specific request.and.deal with
that as it occurs. Mayor Courtney asked if.a specific parcel was involved and
Mr. Rosland explained that currently the one in mind is a parcel that was cut by
a roadway from park property. In response to the comments made, Mr. Rosland said
staff would draft some general guidelines as to what City owned land might be con-
sidered for sale and bring those back to the Council. No action was taken.
CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that renewals for the various
City insurance coverages will be due July 1, 1985. During the past eight years the
City has able to obtain very good rates. However, the City can anticipate some
major changes in the premium rates,. The key reason for this is primarily due to a
total economic upheaval in the insurance industry due to lower interest rates and
a dramatic rise in the cost of reinsurance. Staff has been working on renewals
since the end of February and felt that the Council should be advised that it is
expected that premiums will double and in some instances triple in rates. No action
was taken.
5/6/85,
COUNCIL /LEGISLATORS BREAKFAST SCHEDULED MAY 24. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council
that a breakfast meeting with our legislators and other local officials is scheduled
for .7.30--.a.m. on Friday, May 24 in the Manager's. Conference Room.
POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENDED. Member Kelly commended,the Police Department for the
prompt action taken by a police officer recently in responding to a call for help
for a neighborhood resident who recently suffered a heart attack, and commented
that the prompt response undoubtedly saved the life of that person.
CITY NEWSLETTER LISTS COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES. Member Turner commented that the
April 1, 1985 Edina Newsletter listed the community health services that are
available to residents together with the phone number for First Call for Help.
She said she was pleased to see the prompt response of the staff to the suggest-
ions made at the joint meeting of the Council /Advisory Board of Health held in
March, 1985 that this information be disseminated to the public. No action taken.
ORDINANCE REGARDING REGULATING DISH ANTENNAS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA. Member Turner
stated that-she has read about pending Federal legislation concerning dish antennas
and asked about the status of the City's ordinance relating to this type of tele-
communication equipment. Mr. Rosland recalled that at Second Reading of Ordinance
No. 812 -A2 the motion for adoption was defeated and the issues of both dish
antennas and other similar types of accessory uses of personal property was
referred back to the Planning Commission for review. Motion of Member Turner
was seconded by Member Kelly to again place Second Reading of the ordinance on
the next Council Agenda.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
LETTER FROM JOHN HAGEN REGARDING UTILITY BILLING DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen asked
that staff respond to the letter from John Hagen, 6400 Xerxes Avenue So., which
was addressed to Member Bredesen, regarding the water and sewer-billings for
his residence. Mr. Rosland said that a.response would be sent to Mr. Hagen.
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Member Richards reported he -would
present recommendations for the City Hall Space Study Committee members at the
next Council Meeting. No action was taken.
BOARD OF REVIEW SCHEDULED FOR MAY 13, 1985.. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council
that they are scheduled to meet as the Board of Review on Monday, May 13, 1985,
at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Room to hear those residents who wish to appeal their
property valuations for assessment purposes.
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Hoffman, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICIATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING
IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS SS -369 & 370, 85 -5B;
WM -353, 354 & 355, 85 -5A; ST.S -175 & 176; C -143
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulle-
tin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING
IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS
SS -369 & 370, 85 -5B;
WM -353; 354 & 355, 85 -5A
St.S. -175. & 176; C -143
CONTRACT 485 -5 (ENG)
BIDS CLOSE MAY 16, 1985
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina City
Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.m., May 16, 1985 and the Edina City
Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 20, 1985 to consider said bids for
sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and graveling. The following are approxi-
mate quantities of the major items:
5/6/85
2020 L /F, Sanitary Sewer 8 thru 15"
4500 L /F, Watermain 6 & 8"
1740 L /F, Storm Sewer 12 thru 30"
1986 Ton, Cl. 2 Gravel
Bids shall be in a, sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the,City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them
may be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office..
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications
with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by
bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the amount of at least ten
(10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00
payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn-
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment of
the following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50,
Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming Pool Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07,
Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265.58,
Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Construction Fund
$19,721.04, Total $459,947.19.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
City Clerk
tl 'n
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 20, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
AWARD OF HONOR PRESENTED. Mayor Courtney read the following'Award of Honor
which, as a plaque, was presented to Theodore Charles Frank:
Award of Honor
Theodore Charles Frank
April 22, 1985
Theodore Charles Frank is given the Award of Honor for his heroic rescue act of
April 22, 1985. On that date, he was traveling on West 66th.Street in Edina
adjacent to Lake Cornelia. Another motorist lost control of her vehicle, and
it left the roadway, goin& into the lake. The driver was unable to extricate
herself, and the vehicle began to sink. With little regard for his own personal
safety, Mr. Frank dove into the icy water, swam to the vehicle, dove underwater
to check for additional passengers, and then freed the driver by pulling her
through the window of the vehicle. Mr. Frank then aided the driver to shore
and provided for her comfort. Mr. Frank's deeds exceed those expected of the
common man. He acted in a courageous manner and possibly saved the life of a
motorist. For this, he deserves our commendation and Award of Honor.
Signed: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police; and C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor.
EMPLOYEE COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Rick Jacobson, the City's Assistant
Park and.Recreation Director. Rick will be leaving to become the Director of
Park and Recreation in Golden Valley. He has been with the City of Edina since
1969, coming on board as the Recreation Supervisor. In 1977, he became the
Assistant Park and Recreation Director. On behalf of the City of Edina, Mr.
Rosland extended wishes for success in his new position, and he commented that
Rick is one of the finest Park and Recreation people in the, Twin City area and
the State of Minnesota.
PRD -3 PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVED FOR CAHILL ROAD AND WEST 78TH STREET (KLODT CON-
STRUCTION). Affidavits.of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and
ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised that the subject project, generally
located at the NW quadrant of Cahill Road and West 78th Street, was rezoned to
PRD -3 in 1980 to allow the construction of an 89 unit, 8 building condominium
project. In March of 1983, a plan was approved which contained 54 condominium
units in two buildings on.the,east side of the site while leaving three
original condominium buildings containing.35 units on the westerly portion of
the site. In August of 1983, a second amendment was approved which increased
the condominium count from 54 to 60 units and replaced the original units on the
west side with 29 townhouse units. None of the plans have commenced construction.
Mr. Larsen stated that the proponent, Klodt Construction Company, had submitted
new plans which modify the overall development by reducing the number of townhouse
units from 29 to 24 and increases the number'of condominium units from 60 to 65,
all of which would be in one building, not two as.previously approved. The
townhouse units were presented as four six -unit structures. The overall density
of 8.5 units per acre and the unit count of 89 remains the same in all proposals.
The current proposal represents a departure from the earlier,proposal in two
significant respects. First, the condominium units would now all be in one
building. This results in a much more imposing building. Second, the townhouses
are now proposed to have one main living floor and a walk -out basement. The
earlier proposal had two living levels plus a basement. This increases lot
coverage and increases the amount of the site occupied by the townhouses. Mr.
Larsen explained that there would be 2,015 square feet for each townhouse unit,
which includes the floor area of the garages. In this respect, the individual
unit sizes would be similar to those in the previous plan. Units in the
condominium building have been reduced slightly in size and are now proposed at
the minimum size required in the Ordinance. Parking, lot coverage and building
and parking setbacks all conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.
The landscaping plan conforms in regard to quantities, but the sizes of some
items are smaller than required. Deciduous trees should be 22 inches in
5/20/85
diameter, and coniferous trees should be at least 6 feet in height. The proposed
utility plan is satisfactory for the condominium but needs additional information
for the townhouse portion of the site. The two curb cuts on Cahill Road limit
or prevent access by fire - fighting equipment. Mr. Larsen reported that the
proposed use and mix of unit types remain from previously approved plans and
that Staff continues to support the concept. The Community Development and Planning
Commission heard the subject proposal at its May 1, 1985, meeting and recommended
approval, subject to the following conditions: 1):Redesign of access to accommodate
emergency vehicles; 2) A utility plan acceptable to City Staff; 3) Developer's
agreement; 4) Shademaster Locust be increased to a minimum caliper diameter of
22 inches; and 5) Spruce trees be increased to a mininum of six feet in height.
Mr. Paul Klodt, the proponent of the plan, was introduced. He explained that
the change was being made in the townhouse project; the one -story unit would be
marketed much better than the two or three -story units. Most of the units would
be walk -outs. Mr. Klodt felt that the market for this particular type of unit
was the "empty nester." The proponent met with the neighbors and expressed their
concern regarding the proximity of the project to their property; the proponent
agreed to provide a hedge of evergreens to shield the project from the neighbors'
view, which in turn would help the project aesthetically. Mr. Klodt advised
that the apartment -type units would be pretty much the same as the original plan,
except that they would now be in one building instead of two. Mrs. Kelly pointed
out that this was a pretty piece of property and hoped that as many of the trees
as possible could be saved. Mr. William Harrison, on the Board of Directors of
the Winwood Association, was introduced. He explained that Winwood is a neighbor
of Pondwood to the north, and a common boundary is shared from one side to the
other. He expressed the concern about the protection offered by the hedge of
evergreens, and Mr. Klodt assured him that the landscaping will take this into
consideration. Also under consideration is the view from Cahill. Mr. Harrison
then thanked Mr. Klodt and wished him well. No further comment being heard, Member
Richards moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the petition of Klodt Construction
Company for.a PRD -3 Plan Amendment for townhouse /condominium units at Cahill Road
and West 78th Street be approved, subject to the following conditions:
1) Redesign of access to accommodate emergency vehicles; 2) A utility plan
acceptable to City Staff; 3) Developer's agreement; 4) Shademaster Locust be
increased to a minimum caliper diameter of 22 inches; and 5) Spruce trees be
increased to a minimum of six feet in height. Motion for adoption of the
resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR OPUS CORPORATION /NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Planner Larsen described the subject property as being generally
located west of France Avenue and south of West 76th Street at 7700 France Avenue.
He reported that it is being developed with a four -story office building containing
229,100 square feet of floor area. The building will serve as corporate head-
quarters for National Car Rental. When the new Zoning Ordinance was adopted in
.1984, the site was rezoned from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Planned
Office District -2 (POD -2). National Car is proposing a five -story addition
containing a gross area of approximately 106,655 square feet which would be
constructed on the north end of the existing four--story building. Floor area
limits were imposed on this and other parcels in the plat of Edina Office Center
in 1978 because of traffic concerns in the area; these restrictions were removed
by the City Council in 1983. The development of the site is now limited by the
0.5 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of the Office District in the Zoning Ordinance, and
the proposed addition would result in a FAR of approximately 0.36 for the site.
Mr. Larsen reported that the Zoning Ordinance requires parking at a rate of one
space for each 250 square of gross floor area in office buildings which are in
excess of 220,000 square feet. Due to the high parking demand created by
National Car, the proposal calls for approximately 230 more parking spaces than
required by the Zoning Ordinance. The drive aisle and 15 existing parking stalls
5/20/85
south of the building maintain non - conforming setbacks. The Zoning Ordinance
requires that all parking and drive aisles maintain a 20 -foot minimum setback from
any street right -of -way. The proponents have stated their willingness to remove
the parking spaces, but due to the location of certain mechanical equipment near
the building, relocation of the drive isle to conform to the setback requirement
would be difficult and costly. Thus, a 5 -foot setback variance is requested for
the drive isle. Mr. Larsen explained that when the property was platted, a
40 -foot easement was dedicated along the southerly boundary of the property and
• 60 -foot wide easement was provided on the westerly end of the site to provide
• connection to West 77th Street. It was anticipated that these roadways would
be constructed when the drive -in theater was redeveloped. The City has commissioned
BRW to make a recommendation on the design of the link from West 77th Street to
the new road. It was reported that staff believes that the addition will compliment
the existing high quality of the development. Approval of the final development
plan along with a 5 -foor drive isle setback variance to allow the existing drive
isle to remain is recommended with the following conditions: 1) That additional
right -of -way, as needed on the westerly portion of the site, be dedicated at this
time; and '2) That the non - conforming parking speces along the south property line
be removed. Mr. Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation, representing National Car,
was introduced. He explained that the addition will be used for additional office
space for National Car, utilizing an open office concept. Additional storage space
will be needed, and the cafeteria will be expanded to allow for a French outdoor
cafe feeling instead of a totally enclosed space. There will also be space for
utility rooms within the building. Mr. Worthington feels the design is com-
patible with the existing architecture, and they may be back in the future for
even further expansion. Construction, if the project is approved, is slated to
begin in June of 1985, with a completion date of April, 1986. Member Kelly
questioned the proposed road to be cut through on the southern portion as to
whether it will impact the proposed Homart Project and its nearness to the
drainage ditch. Mr. Hoffman explained that the road will go right over the top
of the ditch and northwest over to 77th Street. He commented that the road is
tied into serving both properties ( Homart and Opus), and it serves as an extra
outlet from the Pentagon Park area. Half of the road is on Edina's property,
and the other half is in Bloomington. No further comment being heard, Member
Turner moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
Final Development Plan for Opus Corporation /National.Car Rental Systems at 7700
France Avenue be and hereby approved and that a 5 -foot drive isle setback
variance is granted, subject to the following conditions: 1) That additional
right -of -way, as needed on the westerly portion of the site, be dedicated at
this time; and 2) That the non - conforming parking spaces along the south property
line be removed when the new street is constructed. Motion for adoption of the
resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT FOR ROBERT ANDERSON OF 425 WASHINGTON AVENUE
FAILED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk,
approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the subject
property is generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney
Avenue, actually on the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County
Road 18 is located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is
to the south. The site measures 70 feet in width, approximately 125 in depth
and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. The site is vacant. The proponent,
Mr. Robert Anderson, is requesting rezoning of the site from R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District, in order to allow
the construction of a two -unit dwelling. The zoning ordinance requires R -2 lots
to be at least 90 feet in width and to contain at least 15,000 square feet in
lot area. Consequently, lot width and lot area variances would also be required
to make this a buildable R -2 site. Mr. Larsen described the two -block stretch
of lots fronting on Washington Avenue as low- density attached residential. At
the present time, there are four existing doubles which are zoned R -2 and two
legal, non - conforming doubles on Washington. There are eleven single - dwelling
units fronting on Washington Avenue. The existing double bungalow lots measure
between 76 and 79 feet in width, except for the most northerly lot "which measures
124 feet in width. The existing R -1 lots measure between 45 and 78 feet in width.
Mr. Larsen explained that the subject site is designated by the Comprehensive
Plan as being suitable for the proposed use. In addition to this designation,
the Plan contains a policy which states: "Consider the redevelopment or retro-
filling of single - family dwellings to multi - family uses if located in areas
5/20/85
designated as low density attached residential. Such redevelopment or retro-
filling should require rezoning and upgrading of dwellings and properties to
multi - family standards." Using the required setbacks for the lot, it appears
that a modestly sized double bungalow or duplex could be constructed on the
site which would conform to zoning ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen stated
that the development or redevelopment of properties along Washington as
doubles is reasonable and to be expected; however, he commented that staff
does have reservations concerning the minimum size of lots to be developed
as doubles. (At this time, 7:35 PM, Member Bredesen arrived.) Mr. Robert
Anderson, the owner of the subject property, presented to the Council the plan
of the structure. He pointed out that the garages are in the front of the
structure, with the setback being 30 or 35 feet. There is an alley in the back
which is not being used at the present time; the lots have extended into the
alley, although the alley has not been officially vacated. The cemetery is
immediately to the south, and County Road 18 is to the front of the dwelling,
immediately to the west. Member Richards indicated that this is a strong neighbor-
hood of single- family residences; he felt that a more appropriate use, given the
variance being requested, would be R -1 and not R -2. Therefore, he did not
support the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mrs. Turner commented that
this concept is similar to accessory housing; this is a transitional area
between single family homes and a busy highway. She felt that it was an
opportunity for relatively modest housing and that the zoning request is
appropriate. Member Richards indicated that this is a situation in which the
exact same square footage of land has doubled its density; this creates
problems in other contexts and other forms. He felt that land packages
could be created for a better environment. Member Kelly pointed out a similar
home on either William or Bedford built on property that wasn't quite adequate,
so the garage was put out in .front. -Mr. Anderson commented that. the garage
out in front of the subject property was to serve as a buffer from County Road
18. He added that there are two double bungalows right next door to the .
project. There being no further discussion, Member Turner's motion for approval
of the zoning change was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner
Nays: Richards, Courtney
Motion failed.
APPEAL FROM BOARD OF APPEALS & ADJUSTMENTS REGARDING JOHN GABBERT'S PROPERTY
AT 7010 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH WITHDRAWN. Planner Larsen reported that the
proponent has asked to withdraw the appeal, which pertained to 7010 France
Avenue South, Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R. W. W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor
Addition. There was no further discussion.
HEALTH HAZARDS OF LAWN SPRAYING WITH CHEMICALS DISCUSSED. Mary Reed, 5100
Skyline Drive, spoke of her concern regarding Chemlawn's spraying of chemicals
on lawns approximately two times each month. She reported that she had spoken
with the Health Department three years ago, and she was told that a study had
been done. She felt that a new study should be done in .that there might be
some new information in regard to the chemicals and associated health hazards.
Mr. Rosland reported that the outcome of a study indicated that the City's
spraying is done in a very judicious manner and every piece of property is not
sprayed all the time. __Mayor Courtney recommended obtaining information from
the study done in St. Paul. Mr. Rosland commented that all of the known
chemicals are being used; there are pros and cons as to whether any of them
cause cancer or not. All of these chemicals, however, have been approved by
the State; nevertheless, this does not rule out the fact that they might be
harmful. Member Bredesen reported that there has been a concern regarding the
particles from the chemicals getting into the air; he also recommended following
up with St. Paul's study. Mr. Rosland explained that the City's spraying is
usually in the early.morning and late evening, prior to dark; a wetting agent
is used time to time which makes it a heavier spray, and this makes the
particles less apt to blow in the air. Perhaps a local company should be
contacted which builds sprayers to find out what customers use. Mr. Rosland
will report back on this issue.
BID AWARDED FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING. Mr.
Rosland presented the bids for Improvement No.'s SS -369, 370, 85 -5B; WM -353,
354, 355, 85 -5A; St. S. -175, 176 and C -143, which pertain to sanitary sewer,
watermain, storm sewer and graveling. The recommended low bidder was Brown
5/20/85
& Cris, Incorporated at $270,258.60; Northdale Construction Company, Incorpor-
ated at $290,535.15; G. L. Contracting, Incorporated at $298,509.26; Hayes
Contractors, Incorporated'at $320,289.83; and L. & G. Rehbein, Incorporated
at $354,041.25. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for
award to recommended low bidder, Brown & Cris, Incorporated, for sanitary
sewer, watermain, storm sewer and graveling.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 5/14/85 APPROVED. There being no items for
Council's authorization of recommendation action, Member Bredesen's motion was
seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Traffic Safety Committee minutes of
May 14, 1985, specifically acknowledging Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT APPROVED. Mr. Rosland referred to a letter to
Mayor Courtney from Mrs. Barbara Reynolds, Chair of the Edina Advisory Health
Commission, which provides reasons for renewing the public health contract with
the two -year plan of the Community Health Services:
1. Because the CHS plan is developed out of the identification of needs and goals
for health services in Edina, it makes sense to plan jointly with service pro-
vider for meeting those needs and goals for the full tow -year period.
2. Continuity in the provision of health care services can be guaranteed for at
least a minimum of two years. 3. With a two -year contract, the Advisory Commission
and the City Council (Board of Health) can become familiar with the service
providers and be knowledgeable regarding their capabilities, staff expertise and
range of services. 4. Because of the necessity of the public health service
providers having knowledge of the community, its residents, resources, and its
"culture," in order to discover needs, to made appropriate referrals, and to
provide services and programs, a two -year contract seems necessary. 5. It is
important for our Edina residents to become familiar with their health service
providers. Communication is difficult enough without frequent changes in health
provider. 6. Each year, many hours of time go into discussion and decision - making
by the City Council, the paid staff of the City and the Advisory Commission,
that could better be spent in program planning or development, if that decision
did not have to be made every year. 7:. The likelihood of an organization entering
into a contract seems greater if the contract is for two years; it takes time to
develop new systems of services and programs. Mr. Rosland pointed out that -this
would be a two -year commitment rather than one year at a time and that this is
agreeable to the staff. Member Bredesen commented he would like to see what a
two -year contract would look like. Member Richards announced that Barbara Reynolds
is moving out of Edina; he thanked her on behalf of the Council. Mayor Courtney
remarked that she won't be forgotten after all that she has done for the City, and
he then introduced her. Mrs. Reynolds reported that the Advisory Health Commission
is an excellent committee of individuals, and she knows that they will continue
to work well, especially with the support given them by the City. With.no more
discussion, Mr. Rosland said that no formal action was needed to approve the Public
Health Services contract; he accepted the concurrence of the Council for the
acceptance of this contract.
SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE APPROVED. Member Richards motion for appointment of the
following persons to serve on the Space Study Committee was seconded by Member
Turner; Cathy Christensen, 6600 Pawnee Road; Bart Foster, 65516 Cherokee Trail; June
Schmidt, 7005 Bristol Blvd.; Bob Schoening, 4612 Edina Blvd.; Dave Sherman, 19
Circle West. Bob Schoening will serve as Chair.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR WEST 70TH STREET /CORNELIA DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SET FOR
JUNE 17, 1985. Mr. Hoffman reviewed the report on West 70th Street. He pointed
out that the Council had decided that West 70th Street would be classified as a
collector street rather than an arterial roadway. The consultant prepared a
signal justification report which was submitted to the State to see if the State
would agree that a traffic light was warranted. The State mathematically computed
that it would meet the criteria for a school- activated crossing, and they would pay
50% of the cost. The State fee is based on "entering legs" to an intersection;
in this case, there are four approaching legs. Therefore, the State would pay for
two West 70th Street legs, or $35,000. The City intends to go ahead with the
5/20/85
striping and signing plan. A request for funding for the remaining $35,000 for
the traffic signal was made to the School District; the Board felt this was an
inappropriate request and that the City ought to fund this. Mr. Rosland reported
that three areas were investigated in regard to the necessary funding. One,
department heads were asked if their budgets could be investigated for sources
of funding and to look at the capital areas in replacement of vehicles and the
capital improvements. Second, the question of discontinuing certain programs
was considered, as well as reducing the number of staff in numerous departments
and starting new employees at lower rates. Judicial use of the staff could help
make up a portion of approximately $15,000 to $20,000. Mr. Rosland does not
recommend laying off staff in any way. Finally, an estimated $50,000 in building
fees from Edinborough is projected, which will be available this year; there will
be joint staffing for this project through Building and Assessing. Member Bredesen
questioned insurance increases, and Mr. Rosland commented that the amount at this
time is unknown. This situation might bring about going into the contingencies
or possibly the reserves. Member Richards asked if the City has ever had to fund
traffic signalization before, and Mr. Hoffman pointed out that this would be the
first time. He reported that Southdale Office Center on the west side of France
Avenue and Southdale Shopping Center on the east side of France Avenue paid for
100% of the two signals.at their major intersections on France Avenue. Member
Bredesen pointed out that the land.being school property at 70th .& Cornelia
warranted the State's involvement in their portion of the funding, because of
the significant amount of pedestrian activity going on. Member Turner questioned
whether approving this signalization would in any way delay going ahead with
the signals on Vernon; Mr. Hoffman responded that this would not impact Vernon.
Member Richards questioned the length of time it would take to get signalization
once approval is given by local government. Mr. Hoffman commented that in this
case, because justification has already been evidenced, bids could be taken in
July after plans have been reviewed; the process would take up to twelve weeks,
bringing it to termination around the first part of October with this signal at
this point in time. Mrs. Phyllis Kohler, 4512 West 70th Street, spoke before the
Council; she implied that she believed that this had already been decided on
January 21, 1985. Her comments: The State, the citizens and the private con-
sultant all say that we need this total package, and the traffic signal is a
major part of that package; the park located there, not just the school, uses
this corner for crossing in connection with athletic activities; the State gave
us what we asked for in regard to the funding of this traffic signal. Member
Kelly questioned whether the cost of a self - activating signal more or less
expensive than a regular signal; Mr. Hoffman commented that the cost is the
same. Mrs. Kohler indicated that the signal would only operate in a self -
activating manner late in the evening and very early in the morning; contrary
to most signals, this intersection has unusual peak hours.. Mr. Hoffman remarked
that "no parking" along 70th Street would have to be authorized by the Council,
which means no parking during the 24 -hour day. This could affect some of the
residential properties along 70th Street. With the new type of striping layout,
there can be no parking along the curb. Mrs. Kohler said that it is usually the
tourist who parks along 70th rather than the resident. Mr. Harold Babb, 4701
West 70th, reported that he has never parked along 70th Street; he indicated that
the delivery of mail is a problem. Mr. Hoffman commented that all mailboxes
were to be removed from along the curb and mail would be delivered to the houses.
At this point, Member Turner moved approval of going ahead with the signal,
with the City participating in a cost of approximately $35,000, based on the
financial plan presented by Mr. Rosland; this motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
This funding would come out of savings on the staff and fees from Edinborough.
Member Bredesen indicated when the insurance premium increases are complete,
there might not be any money left over to spend on this project; therefore, he
wanted to make sure that this $35,000 expenditure is credited against next
year's budget. He pointed out that the school is a major contributor to the
traffic problem at this site; the School District's lack of interest in par-
ticipating in the funding is remarkable. He encouraged looking into creating an
assessment district there and hold a hearing to decide whether an assessment is
the way to pay for this signal. Mr. Hoffman said that the project could be
designed and brought back the night of the hearing. Mrs. Kohler reported that
79% of the people who go through this intersection do not live in this Zip
code area; these are the people who are causing the problem, and they are not
the residents. She questioned, then, why the residents only should be assessed.
Mayor Courtney commented that the same thing is true for any other street, and
that residents have always paid for their own streets; anyone from any location
can use 70th Street at any time. Member Richards supports going ahead and getting
5/20/85
design but delaying approval as to the funding or ordering of the project. A
notice would then be sent to all the people on 70th as to how the striping will
be handled. The staff could then come back with some alternatives as to what
the assessment district will look at. Mr. Hoffman reported that staff could be
back with the hearing process in place on June 17, 1985. No ground would be
lost in doing this; the frame of time for completion would be the same. Member
Turner feels strongly that the commitment is there and.we must move ahead, and
because the assessment hearing will not delay the completion of the signal, she
withdrew her motion. If people object to the assessment hearing, the funding then
will come out the project proposed by Mr. Rosland; therefore, there will be no
delay. Mr. Erickson, the City Attorney, explained that there are two stages
involved - - -the improvement hearing comes before the assessment hearing. The
improvement would be ordered after the first hearing, which would take into account
the plans already prepared; the assessment hearing would follow, once the assess-
ment amount was known. Should an assessment be decided, 100% of the amount the
City would pay need not be assessed; any part of it can be assessed. Also at that
time of the assessment, the areas assessed can be reduced. Therefore, to start, a
fairly large assessment district is recommended; this allows for more manueverability.
With no further discussion, Member Richards' motion that staff move forward
to prepare the hearing plans and submit them to the State and other appropriate
agencies that need to review and approve the plans and that the Staff come back on.
June 17 for an improvement hearing to discuss an assessment district and finally
that notification of the striping on 70th be given to the residents, was seconded
by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REVIEW OF ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE COMMUNITY CENTER'S KITCHEN REFERRED TO
A STAFF TASK FORCE. Mr. Rosland explained that the Community Center has
requested the Council to look at an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to permit
the occupancy of the Center's kitchen by a commercial caterer. Staff's only
concern with this is whether the catering service would extend its services
beyond the confines of the school. Mr. Doug Johnson, Director of the Edina
Community Center, explained that this summer the Center's kitchen will merge
with the High School; it will continue to service the Edina schools but will not
serve any of tenants and staff within the Center. Currently, the kitchen is
,operated by the District. It serves the Center, the Edina elementary schools
and Southview Junior High. In addition, it provides coffee, cookies and meals
to groups using the facility. This "catering" type business produces gross
revenues of close to $4,000 per month; the total.gross revenue for the kitchen
is close to $400,000 per year. Mr. Johnson stated that the hot lunch program
and catering type services are vital to the current and future operation of the
Community Center. Cooking schools, which fit the zoning requirements, were
contacted to find out if there was any interest in leasing the kitchen; this
brought no results. Mr. Johnson indicated that the groups that best fit the
needs of the Center are catering -type organizations. Numerous caterers have
been contacted regarding leasing, and several have expressed interest. All of
them have been made aware of the zoning limitations. As a result of this, Mr.
Johnson is, therefore, very anxious for the Council to consider a zoning
amendment. He pointed out that the Council should keep in mind the following:
1) Food services are critical to the operation of a true Community Center.
Tenants, staff and users of the facility all use these services. 2) It is
unlikely that any caterer would generate anywhere near as much traffic as the
District's own food service. 3) Lease of the kitchen area would provide revenue
to offset the cost of operating the Center. Mr. Johnson told the Council that
this could be done with some type of a conditional.use permit, with a limitation
that it would have to be reviewed every so often. Member Richards questioned
whether the catering service would be able to go out and market its services
anywhere in a for - profit type of situation. Mr. Johnson implied that Council
might consider restrictions in the form of a conditional use permit; then the
Council could vote on a particular group applying for the lease, with staff
shedding light on particular applicants. Mr. Johnson explained that the type
of group they are looking for would provide the kinds of services necessary
for the functioning of the Community Center. The District has already contacted
the tenants in the building that they will not be servicing them under any
condition next year; therefore, unless the Zoning Ordinance is amended and a
caterer commissioned, there would be no food service available for them. A
larger concern would be the lack of service available to the groups using the
building. Member Kelly indicated she would support a change in the ordinance
5/20/85
to allow this catering service. She explained that a particular tenant, Edina
Woman's Club, was not able to meet at the Center because of the cafeteria not.
being available due to the school already using it. It would be nice for groups
such as that to have access to the Community Center with food or meals
available; this does make a true Community Center. Member Bredesen spoke up in
opposition to this proposed amendment; he is not in favor of the Center becoming
a commercial facility in any way. He implied that the concept of a catering
service being operated out of the school, with or without limits on how much
they are operating out of the school, runs contrary to the notion of how'that
facility should be used. He stated that the public problem involved in groups
having lunches available from time to time in the Community Center is smaller
than the public problem involved in making this facility more commercial in nature.
Member Turner reminded Council that they could be turning this over to the
Planning Commission, having staff draw up a potential amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance for Council to consider. She felt that a food service is key to the
Community Center for the tenants, the schools there and the occasional groups
that would use the facility. Member Richards commented that the Council attempt to
set forth a parameter before it goes to the Planning Commission, because.it
might come back with the words "just a little bit profit" or a "little bit of
a commercial nature." Member Kelly asked how Member Bredesen felt that this issue
affected the neighbors; he commented that a commercial catering operation would
not do anything to decrease the traffic and would increase a parking problem.
Member Bredesen explained that if the tenants in the building do not want to pay
for the cost of having a food service, the public in the area immediately around
the facility should not have to solve that. He does not recommend sending the
proposal back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Johnson explained that a definite
rate on the kitchen has not yet been set, because this depends on the type of
group that comes in, as to how many months of the year they will be operating.
Mr. Rosland questioned whether the School District pays any rent now to the
Community Center for the kitchen; in a technical sense they pay rent for everything
they use because the building loses money. If they pull out and the Center rents,
the loss is limited. Member Kelly pointed out that if we have to bend and vary a
little, that's progress; Edina probably would not be where it is today if changes
had not come along. Member Richards stated that the reason Edina is where it is
today is because of its strict adherence to the ordinances. He reported that he
believes in the concept of the user fee in which those users who are going to
avail themselves of the service pay for it. Mr. Rosland recommended that staff
work with Mr. Johnson, looking further into this, rather than sending it back
to the Planning Commission; this could help create other alternatives without
having to change the ordinance. A group could brainstorm this, and it was
suggested that this group, or task force, consist of Mr. Rosland, Mr.
Hughes and Mr. Johnson, and perhaps another City staff member. There being no
further discussion, Member Kelly's motion to refer the study of the Community
Center's kitchen to the suggested task force was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
1985 NOMINATIONS FOR LMC BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland announced
that the League of Minnesota Cities is looking for nominations for its Board of
Directors. Mr. Jim Miller from Minnetonka is running for the Vice Presidency.
Mr. Rosland encouraged Council to submit names to the nominating committee.
There was no further discussion.
BILTMORE MOTEL SITE DISCUSSED. Member Kelly pointed out that the Biltmore Motel
site is a blight to the community because it is being poorly maintained. She
feels the City should go in and cut the grass and assess the present owner. Mr.
Rosland reported that Council should be. hearing from the owner in the near future as
Mr. Hughes indicated after a recent meeting. Apparently, the ownership is being
reworked, and there is a new partner. Mr Rosland assured Council that the lawn
would soon be taken care of, and there was no further discussion.
CONCERN RAISED REGARDING CHILDREN BEING USED TO RAISE MONEY FOR A NON- PROFIT CAUSE
NOT ALTOGETHER LEGITIMATE. Member Turner reported that she received a telephone
call from Mary Kluesner, 4409 Country Club Road, with a concern about children
used to raise money, going door -to -door, and whether or not all the concerns are
legitimate, especially if the children are not from Edina. Member Turner said
the ordinance does not require non - profits to register with the City; for - profit
organizations are required to register with the City before they go door -to -door.
She reported that she and Mrs. Kluesner spoke with Chief Swanson and found out
that there are many complaints like this. Chief Swanson will keep track of the
complaints the City gets during the month of June. Member Turner explained that,
5/20/85
according to the ordinance, residents have the option of saying "no" to
solicitors; if they question the legitimacy of the organization, they can
call City Hall to check on for- profit registration. She indicated that Mrs.
Kluesner would like to see the City tighten up its restrictions; however, the
City must be careful not to restrict the rights of its local organizations
from going door -to -door to raise money. Member Bredesen emphasized that a
citizen of Edina need not give money to anybody involved in an unknown charity.
He indicated that the adults that are taking advantage of these children are
going to continue to do so, and they will quickly move on to some other
community before the City can begin to do something about it. Member Kelly
reported that there a great number of solicitors in her neighborhood who are
not from Edina; she indicated that there should be a way of listing all non - profits.
Mr. Kojetin suggested that a list could be included in the City's Newsletter.
Mr. Erickson explained that the current ordinance regarding solicitations is an
old one; he suspects that much of this ordinance is unenforceable._ He suggested
that it be looked at to see if it could be strengthened and modified. Member
Turner cautioned restricting the non - profits., Chief Swanson will continue to
track the complaints through June, and sometime thereafter it will be brought
back for further discussion.
MEETING SET FOR UPDATE OF LONG -RANGE PLANNING BUDGET. Member Turner suggested
that a meeting be planned to update the strategic planning of the budget. Staff
starts the budget process in June; an update meeting would be timely. Mr. Rosland
recommended June 17 before the Council Meeting, from 5:00 to 7:00 P. M. Council
informally agreed to meet at this time.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS ANNOUNCED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council of the
Legislative Breakfast on May 24 at 7:30 A. M., the Board of Review on May 28 at
5:00 P. M., the AMM Annual Meeting on May 30 at 6:30 P. M. and the LMC Conference
from June 11 to June 14 in St. Paul. Mr. Rosland indicated that Member Turner
will most likely become a new Board Member at the AMM Annual Meeting. It was
also announced that June 24 is "Edina Nite at the Twins "; this is a big promotion
by the Edina Chamber of Commerce.
ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3 AMENDING THE ORDINANCE GRANTING TEMPORARY RELIEF TO ROGERS
CABLESYSTEMS ADOPTED ON SECOND READING, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL
CONTRACTS BY THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY. Mr. Erickson explained
that this Relief Ordinance is basically the same as presented at the last meeting,
except for the addition of a clause that it become effective only with the other
four cities (Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield) passing a similar
ordinance. Mr. Rosland reported that at this time these four cities have granted
the ordinance First Reading. (At this time, Member Richards excused himself.)
Member Bredesen moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 subject to approval of the
final contracts by the City Manager and the City Attorney:
ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120 TO
CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE; TO EXTEND THE FRANCHISE
TERM; TO CHANGE THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS; AND TO
CHANGE THE COMPUTATION OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE
PAID BY CITY UPON EXPIRATION OF THE FRANCHISE.
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraphs J and S of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
J. "Grantee" is Rogers Cablesystems of.Minnesota Limited Partnership, a
Minnesota limited partnership, with Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc.,
a Minnesota corporation, as the General Partner.
S. "SWSCC" shall mean the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission.
Sec. 2. That Article II, Sec. 4 of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows:
This Franchise shall commence upon acceptance by Grantee and shall expire on
December 31, 1995. Provided, however, that if by December 31, 1987, Grantee (i)
is able to close on, and have funded, without conditions, new long term
financing, reasonably satisfactory to City, to replace the obligation evidenced
by loan documents dated April 1, 1982, from Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of
Toronto, Canada, in the original principal amount of Eighteen Million and
No /100 Dollars ($18,000,000.00) (the "Existing Indebtedness "), and (ii) gives
written notice of such new financing to City with written evidence thereof
reasonably acceptable to City, then, upon the occurrence of (i) and (ii) by
December 31, 1987, the term of this Franchise shall be extended'by four (4)
years, from December 31, 1995 to December 31,1999, subject, however, to
approval of such extension by the.Board, if required, and the FCC, if required,
and any other governmental body having jurisdiction over the matter, if required.
5/20/85
If any such approvals are required, City and Grantee agree to cooperate in
obtaining such approvals. If any such approvals are required, and are not
obtained, for any reason, then the four (4) year extension shall not become
effective. If such extension becomes effective, Grantee and City shall sign
and deliver an agreement evidencing such extension, but such extension shall
be effective even without such additional agreement.
Sec. 3. That Article V, Sec. 2 of said Ordinance be amended by adding thereto
a new Paragraph F as follows:
F. City may waive, at any time and from time to time, for good cause shown,
by Council resolution, compliance by Grantee with any or all of the require-
ments imposed on Grantee by this Sec. 2 relative to providing service to any
extended area or areas.
Sec. 4. That Article VIII, Sec. 2, Paragraph A, subparagraph (4) of said
Ordinance be amended to read as follows:
(4) Any and all claims which Grantee may now or hereafter have or claim to
have against City, its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents,
employees or officials, due to or arising out of, damage to any of Grantee's
property or equipment, including, without limitation, resulting or consequential
loss of income, injury to reputation, or any other resulting or consequential
damages of any kind, caused by or resulting from acts or omissions of City or
any of its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents, employees or
officials.
Sec. 5. That Article VIII, Sec. 3, Paragraph A of said Ordinance be amended
to read as follows:
A. Grantee shall maintain liability insurance covering its obligations of
indemnification provided for in, or as a result of the exercise of, this
Franchise (except, however, for the indemnifications in subparagraph (3) of
Article VIII, Sec. 2, Paragraph A of this Franchise) covering both the City
and Grantee and shall maintain said insurance during the term of this Franchise
in the minimum of:
1. $500,00.00 for property damage to any one person;
2. $2,000,000.00 for property damage in any one act or occurrence;
3. $1,000,000.00 for personal injury to any one person; and
4. $2,000,000.00 for personal injury in any one act or occurrence.
The.foregoing insurance may be provided by means of a blanket liability insurance
policy or policies with an annual aggregate limitation of not less than
$26,000,000.00.
Sec. 6. That Article VIII, Sec. 3, Paragraph E of said Ordinance be amended
to read as follows:
E. All insurance policies maintained pursuant to this Franchise shall contain
the following endorsements and provisions:
(i) It is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not be
cancelled nor the intention not to renew be stated until 60 days after receipt
to City, by registered mail, of written notice of such intention to cancel or
not to renew.
(ii) A waiver of subrogation, in form and substance acceptable to City, as to
any and all claims against the City which are waived hereunder by Grantee or
as to which Grantee has agreed hereunder to indemnify and hold harmless the City
and its officers, boards, commissioners, servants, officials, agents and employees.
(iii) A provision that if the aggregate insurance coverage of the blanket policies
provided by Grantee is ever reduced -below $10,000,000.00, then notice of such
fact shall promptly be given to City by Grantee or Grantee's insurance agent
and additional liability coverage shall immediately be purchased by Grantee so
as to restore the annual aggregare to the minimum amount then required under
this Franchise.
Sec. 7. That Article XI, Sec. 2, Paragraph C of .said Ordinance be amended to
read as follows:
C. The purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon revocation or
termination of the Franchise shall be the cost less depreciation (as shown on
the books and records of Grantee) or the fair market value, whichever is less,
and goodwill shall not be included in the purchase price of the System. However,
if this Franchise expires (and is not revoked or terminated) and if Grantee
has complied with the requirements of Article II, Sec. 4 of this Franchise,
and all required approvals are obtained, so that the Franchise term is extended
for an additional four (4) years pursuant to said Sec. 4, then the purchase
price of the System to be paid by City upon expiration of this Franchise shall
be the fair market value of the System determined on the basis of the System
valued as a going concern but with no value given or allocated to this Franchise
itself. If the City and Grantee cannot agree on the purchase price,'it shall
be determined by arbitration pursuant to the provisions of this Sec. 2.
5/20/85
Sec. 8. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with the provisions
of Article XIV of said Ordinance, including delivery to City of the acceptance,
opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said
Article XIV, and provided further, however, that it shall become effective only
if all of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield
adopt an ordinance similar to this Ordinance within ninety (90) days after the
adoption of this Ordinance.
Sec. 9. Subject to the provisions of Sec. 8 hereof, this Ordinance shall be
in full force and effect upon adoption and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
City of Edina, MINNESOTA
Attest:
City Clerk
By
And
Mayor
City Manager
ORDINANCE NO. 1121 PROVIDING CATV (CABLE TELEVISION) RELIEF ADOPTED ON SECOND
READING. Mr. Rosland indicated that the key aspect of this Ordinance is
moving the franchise fees from 5 to 3 %, giving 2% relief to the Company, and
the various cities picking up 1% of the programming. Member Bredesen moved
adoption of Ordinance No:::1121 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1121
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE,
PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. Short Title.
This ordinance shall be known as the "CATV Relief Ordinance."
Sec. 2. Background and Purpose.
The City has granted a cable television franchise through the adoption of City
Ordinance Code No. 1120, the Cable Communications Ordinance (.hereinafter called
the "Franchise "). The cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins and Richfield
(the "Other Cities ") have adopted similar ordinances, all with the same franchise
Grantee. Through the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC "), a joint
powers organization, the City and the Other Cities have undertaken to supervise
Grantee's compliance with these ordinances. Since the adoption of the Franchise,
Grantee has constructed and is operating a cable communications system in City
and the Other Cities. Grantee has approached the City indicating that it is
experiencing serious financial difficulties and would be unable to pay the
franchise fee due and payable on November 1, 1984. Grantee requested a temporary
reduction of its Franchise obligations to allow for its financial recovery.
City authorized the SWSCC to review Grantee's request and make recommendations
for an appropriate response. SWSCC retained a financial consultant to assist
in analyzing Grantee's financial condition, held several public meetings,
and conducted a, thorough review of Grantee's request. SWSCC determined that
Grantee is experiencing serious financial difficulties caused by such adverse
factors as higher than anticipated construction and operating costs, lower
than projected market penetration, inability to obtain long -term financing
at projected rates and other industry, economic and technological changes.
SWSCC also concluded that Grantee cannot secure needed refinancing of its
long -term debt, cannot continue to provide the present level of service and
cannot become an economically viable enterprise unless the City grants a
period of relief from some of the requirements of the Franchise. SWSCC
recommends that the City grant temporary amendments to the Franchise, re-
ducing the franchise fee payable now and in the future, eliminating the re-
quired performance bond, and modifying the provisions for local programming.
In return, Grantee would execute a Performance Agreement providing a means for
monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local
programming, and providing for certain other matters related to Grantee's
requested relief. The City has reviewed SWSCC's recommendations and has con-
sidered the option of requiring full payment of the past due franchise fee
through use of Grantee's letter of credit, performance bond, and parent
company performance guarantees. Grantee represents, however, that if the City
and the Other Cities seek payment of past due franchise fees through resort
to such securities, this would only make it more difficult for Grantee to solve
its financial problems and would be counterproductive to any effort to provide
relief to Grantee. In adopting this ordinance, the City relies upon the re-
presentations of�Grantee and seeks to provide a means by which the public can
5/20/85
continue to receive approximately the same level of service while affording
Grantee a reasonable opportunity for financial recovery. The ultimate pur-
pose of this ordinance is to secure, at a later time during the Franchise
term, the full public benefits provided for in the Franchise.
Sec. 3. Relationship to Cable Communications Ordinance.
This ordinance does not permanently amend any provision of the Cable Commission
Ordinance (the "Franchise ") but provides that certain provisions of that
ordinance are modified for a period of time as provided in this Relief Ordinance.
Except as expressly modified in this ordinance, the provisions of the Franchise
remain in full force and effect.
Sec. 4. Definitions.
Subdivision 1. The definitions in the Franchise also apply to this ordinance..
Subd. 2. In addition, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings
given them:
(1) "Existing indebtedness" means an $18,000,000 loan made to Grantee to Toronto
Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada under loan documents dated April 1, 1982.
(2) "Franchise" means the Cable Communications Ordinance as now or hereafter
amended.
(3) "Local Programming Obligations" means, for the purpose of this ordinance,
Grantee's obligations under the Franchise and the offering for cablecast access,
community access and local origination programming.
(4) "Performance Agreement" means a contractual agreement between Grantee,
City and SWSCC, providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition,
assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other
matters related to Grantee's requested relief.
Sec. 5. Relief Granted.
While this ordinance is in effect, the obligations of Grantee are modified to
the extent provided in this section.
Subdivision 1. Franchise Fees - Percentage.
Commencing with Grantee's fiscal year, 1985, the annual franchise fee is re-
duced from 5% of Gross Revenues to 3 %. Such annual fees shall be paid to City
in equal quarterly payments on or before the first day of each of the months
of November, February, May and August next following the end of Grantee's
fiscal year. If this ordinance terminates during any of Grantee's fiscal years,
the franchise fee shall be restored to the rate of 5% of Gross Revenues at the
end of the calendar month in which termination occurs. The restored rate of
5% and the reduced rate of 3% shall be applied respectively to the Gross Revenues
collected only in the months during which each rate was in effect. The fees
accruing at the restored rate shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the
Franchise. The fees accruing at the reduced rate shall be paid in equal
quarterly installments in accordance with the terms of this ordinance.
Subd. 2. Past Due Franchise Fees.
The 1984 franchise fee in the amount of $103,055 payable on or before November
1, 1984, shall be deemed fully discharged and paid if, but only if, Grantee
pays the sum of $61,833 to the City, in four equal payments on or before June
1, June 15, August 15 and October 15, 1985.
Subd. 3. Letters of Credit.
The City Council may by resolution reduce the required amount of the Letter of
Credit below $50,000 if in its sole discretion it determines that a lesser
amount is reasonable and adequate to protect the public. It may thereafter, by
resolution, require the amount of the Letter of Credit to be increased or
fully restored to the amount of $50,000. Grantee shall comply with this require-
ment within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City.
Subd. 4. Performance Bond.
The Grantee may dispense with the $300,000 performance bond required by the
Franchise. The City Council may thereafter by resolution require that such
bond, or a similar bond in a lesser amount, be provided by Grantee. Grantee
shall comply with this requirement within sixty days after written notice has
been given by the City.
Subd. 5. Local Programming Obligations.
Grantee shall expend at least 1% of its annual Gross Revenues each fiscal year
in fulfilling its Local Programming Obligations under the Franchise for public,
governmental, and educational access, but it shall not be obligated to expend
more than that amount for such access. That .amount shall not include any
costs of operation or administration not directly related to the provision
of local programming. This expenditure shall be in complete satisfaction of
Grantee's total Local Programming Obligations during the period of this
ordinance.
Sec. 6. Automatic Termination of Relief Ordinance Provisions.
The provisions of this ordinance, and the relief herein granted, shall cease
to be effective, automatically, upon the occurrence of the earliest of any of
the following events:
5/20/85
Subdivision 1, Failure of the Grantee to complete refinancing its Existing
Indebtedness by December 31, 1987, in accordance with Article II, Section 4
of the Franchise.
Subd. 2. The end of the next month after Grantee has collected cumulative
Gross Revenues in the amount of one hundred million dollars as measured from
September 1, 1984. The determination of cumulative Gross Revenues shall be
based upon audited financial statements for periods for which they are
available and upon Grantee's operating reports for periods for which audited
statements are not then available. Grantee shall provide City with its
financial statements and financial operating reports promptly after they are
prepared.
Subd. 3. March 1, 1992.
Subd. 4. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the Existing Indebtedness,
except through refinancing as provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.
Subd. 5. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the indebtedness arising from
the refinancing provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise.
Subd. 6. Failure of the Grantee to restore or replace the full required amount
of the Letter of Credit as provided in Article VIII, Section 4, paragraph H
of the Franchise.
Subd. 7. Failure of the Grantee to pay the fees as required in Section 5,
Subd. 2 of this ordinance.
Subd. 8. Failure of the Grantee to restore, replace or increase either a
Letter of Credit or bond within sixty days of written notice by the City, as
provided in Section 5, Subdivisions 3 and 4 of this ordinance.
Subd. 9. A holding or determination by any court or agency that any term,
condition or provision of this Relief Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable,
as a result of any action taken by Grantee or any one acting on Grantee's
behalf seeking such determination.
Subd. 10. Sale or transfer.of all or substantially all of the System to a
person or entity other than a parent, subsidiary, related corporation,
affiliated corporation, partner or joint venturer of Grantee or any parent of
Grantee.
Subd. 11. Termination of the Franchise.
Sec. 7. Other Terminations.
This ordinance may also be terminated for cause, under the same procedures for
termination as are contained in the Franchise, for the following reasons:
Subdivision 1. All grounds for termination provided in the Franchise, except
to the extent that Grantee's performance obligations are modified in this
ordinance.
Subd. 2. The purchase by Grantee, its general partner, or any parent, sub-
sidiary, affiliate or other related corporation of Grantee or its general
partner, of a cable communications system of any part thereof or interest
therein, located within the seven - county metropolitan area as defined in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.121, Subd. 2. For this purpose, the definition
of a cable communications system shall be as that term is currently defined
by the Board. Such a purchase shall not be grounds for termination of this
ordinance; however, if the Grantee demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction
of the City that the purchase (1) will not impair the operating cash flow or
financial position of Grantee and (2) will involve independent financing of
the purchase without resort to the assets of the System.
Subd. 3. Failure of the Grantee to comply with any of the provisions . of the
Performance Agreement.
Sec. 8. Requests for Further Relief.
No request by the Grantee for any further relief from the requirements of the
Franchise, including a request for an extension of the term of this ordinance,
shall be considered by the City unless that request is made in writing prior
to September 1, 1990. The City shall have no obligation whatsoever to con-
sider or grant any such request, and any response to such request shall be at
the sole discretion of the City.
Sec. 9. Acceptance of This Relief Ordinance; Providing of Guarantees.
This ordinance shall be effective in accordance with the provisions of
Article XIV of the Franchise including delivery to the City of the acceptance,
opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said
Article XIV; provided further, however, that it shall become effective only
if all of the Other Cities adopt an ordinance similar to this ordinance within
90 days after adoption of this ordinance. Also, this ordinance shall not
become effective until Grantee, City, SWSCC and the Other Cities have
executed and delivered the Performance Agreement and contractual documents
attached thereto as exhibits.
5/20/85
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner,Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
Attest:
City Clerk City Mayor
PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS APPROVED. Member Bredesen intro-
duced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RRgnT TTTTON
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager be and they
are hereby directed and authorized to execute a Performance Agreement between
Rogers Cable- Systems of Minnesota Limited Partnership, Rogers U. S: Cablesystems,
Inc., the City of Edina and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager, upon their approval thereof,
be authorized to also execute Exhibit A - Contract for Local Programming Facilities
and Exhibit B - Contract for Public, Educational and Government Access Service.
ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1985.
Motion for adoption of this resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2 (REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF RADIO AND TELE-
VISION ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS, AND SUPPORTING TOWERS) DISCUSSED AND
CONTINUED TO JUNE 3, 1985. Mr. Rosland reminded Council that at the last meeting
this ordinance and considered amendments were discussed. This discussion was
centered around setbacks for dish antennas. The ordinance, as written, requires
antennas to maintain the same setbacks required for accessory buildings, which
are five feet from the interior side and five feet from the rear property line.
Mr. Rosland reported that if the Council should desire to increase the required
setbacks, staff would recommend a ten -foot interior side yard setback and a 25 -foot
rear yard setback, which are the setback requirements for principal structures
in the Zoning Ordinance. Member Turner supports the original ordinance; she felt that
if there were more stringent setbacks for the dishes, it treats them differently
than other similar kinds of accessory items that we allow in yards. Member Bredesen
supports the ordinance as requiring antennas to maintain the same setbacks required
for accessory buildings. (At this point, Member Richards returned.) Planner Larsen
commented that at the present time the City is having trouble restricting antennas'
location on property; it is difficult to keep them off the rooftops. Member
Richards would support making the ordinance altogether more restrictive. There
being no further discussion, Member Richards' motion to continue discussion of
Ordinance No. 812 -A2 to June 3, 1985 was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Kelly, Turner
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS
ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland explained that the City has been working with Fairview
Community Hospitals regarding strengthening the Paramedic Program and
Emergency Medical Services. Fairview wants to continue to work with the
City of Edina in any way that they can to expand the relationship. Council
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO HEALTH CARE REVENUE
BONDS, SERIES 1985A (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY
HOSPITALS PROJECT) AND A BANK REVENUE BOND,
SERIES 1985A (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS
PROJECT); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF
PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER
474, AS AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXE-
CUTION AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS RELATING
THERETO.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as
follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Recitals.
1.01. General Authority. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
474, as amended (the Act), to issue its revenue bonds to finance projects consistin`
5/20/85
of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise,
whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services,
including, without limitation, hospitals, nursing homes and related medical
facilities.
1.02. Proposed Project and Bonds. Fairview Community Hospitals (Fairview), a
Minnesota non - profit corporation which owns and operates an acute care hospital in
the City known as Fairview Southdale Hospital (the Hospital), has proposed that
the City, acting under and pursuant to the Act, issue and sell its Health Care
Revenue Bonds, Series 1985A (Fairview Community Hospitals Project) (the Program
Bonds) for the purpose of defraying the costs of a project (the Project) consisting
generally of the acquisition and installation of items of equipment in the Hospital
and the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness of Fairview incurred in the
acquisition or betterment of the Hospital.
1.03. Prior Authority. On April 15, 1985, this Council adopted a resolution
giving preliminary approval to the financing of the Project and authorizing pre-
paration of necessary documents.
1.04. Documentation. Forms of the following documents relating to the financing
of the Project have been prepared and submitted to this City and are hereby directed
to be filed with the City Clerk:
(a) An Agreement (the Agreement) between the City and Fairview pursuant to which
the City will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to Fairview and Fairview agrees to
complete the Project and make payments sufficient to pay the principal of, pre-
mium, if any, and interest on the Bonds (as hereinafter defined) as the same be-
come due and payable;
(b) An Indenture of Trust (the Indenture) between the City and Mellon Bank, N. A.,
as trustee (the Trustee), providing for the issuance of the Bonds and for their
payment;
(c) A Commitment Agreement by and between Municipal Bond Insurance Association
(the Insurer) and the City, pursuant to which payment of principal of and interest
on the Bonds will be insured by the Insurer under an insurance policy, a surety
bond and a program fee surety bond (the Commitment Agreement);
(d) A Declaration of Trust by Mellon Bank, N. A. (the Declaration Trustee)
under which the Program Bonds will be deposited along with the bonds of other tax -
exempt issuers for the benefit of the owners of Certificates of Participation in
the trust;
(e) A Letter of Credit Agreement between Credit Suisse, a Swiss banking corpor-
ation, acting by its New York Branch (the Bank) and the City pursuant to which a
letter of credit will be issued by the Bank to the Declaration Trustee, to secure
payment, under certain circumstances, of the purchase price of Certificates of
Participation tendered by the owners thereof and not remarketed, and providing for
the issuance by the City to the Bank of a bond (the Bank Bond) to evidence the
City's obligations to the Bank (the Program Bonds and the Bank Bond are referred to
as the Bonds);
(f) A Letter of Credit to be issued by the Bank for the account of the City
(the Letter of Credit);
(g) A Guaranty by Fairview under which Fairview will guaranty to the Bank the
obligation of the City under the Letter of Credit Agreement;
(h) A Placement Agreement by and between the Declaration Trustee, InterHealth,
a Minnesota non - profit corporation (the Servicer), the Bank and The First Boston
Corporation (the Agent) (the Placement Agreement), whereby the Agent will place
tendered Certificates of Participation;
(i) A Tender Agent Agreement by and between the Declaration Trustee, the
Bank, the Servicer and the Agent (the Tender Agent Agreement), whereby the Agent
will receive any tendered Certificates of Participation;
(j) A Bond Purchase Agreement by and between The First Boston Corporation (the
Underwriter) and the City (the Bond Purchase Agreement), whereby the Underwriter
agrees to purchase the Program Bonds from the City;
(k) A Certificate Placement Agreement by and between the Underwriter and the
Declaration Trustee (the Certificate Placement Agreement), whereby the Under-
writer agrees to act as agent in offering the Certificates of Participation
to qualified investors; and
(1) A Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the Underwriter will offer the
Certificates of Participation to qualified financial institutions.
Section 2. Findings.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
(a) The Project, as defined herein and in the Agreement, constitutes a project
authorized by the Act;
(b) The Project is in the public interest and the effect thereof will be to
promote the health and public welfare by the attraction, encouragement and de-
velopment of hospital and medical facilities at a location which is accessible
to the residents of the City;
5/20/85
(c) The Project_ is to be located within the City, at a site which is readily
accessible to employees and persons seeking medical care residing within the City
and surrounding area;
(d) The issuance and sale of the Bonds, the loan of Program Bond proceeds for
the Project, the execution and delivery by the City of the Agreement, the Inden-
ture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond
Purchase Agreement and the performance by the City of all covenants and agree-
ments of the City contained in the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment
Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement and of
all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of
Minnesota to make the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the
Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds valid and
binding special or limited obligations of the City in accordance with their terms,
are authorized by the Act;
(e) It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set
forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which the City will grant a
security interest in the Agreement and the payments thereunder to the Trustee
as security for the payment of the principal, premium of, if any, and interest
on the Bonds and the City has not heretofore pledged, assigned or otherwise
encumbered its interest in the Agreement;
(f) The payments which Fairview will be required by the Agreement to make will
be sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest on.all
Bonds issued under the Indenture when due; and the Agreement also provides that
Fairview is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the
Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon;
(g) Under the provisions of the Act and as provided in the Agreement and the
Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds of
the City other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not
subject to any liability thereon and no holders of the Bonds shall ever have
the right to compel any exercise of the taxing powers of the City to pay any of
the Bonds or the interest thereon nor to enforce payment thereof against any
property of the City; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encum-
brance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except its interest
in the Agreement; each Bond issued under the Indenture shall recite that the
Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues pledged
to the payment thereof; and no Bond shall constitute a debt of the City within
the meaning of any constitutional, charter or statutory limitation;
(h) The execution and delivery of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commit-
ment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and
the Bonds will not conflict with, or constitute on the part of the City a breach
of or a default under, any existing agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or
other instrument to which the City is subject or is a party or by which it is
bound; provided that this finding is made solely for the purpose of estopping
the City from denying the validity of the Agreement, the Indenture, the
Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase
Agreement or the Bonds by reason of the existence of any facts contrary to this
finding;
(i) No litigation is pending or, to the best knowledge of the members of this
Council, threatened against the City questioning the organization or jurisdiction
of the City or the right of any officer of the City to hold his or her office,
or in any manner questioning the .right and power of the City to execute and
deliver the Bonds, or otherwise questioning the validity of the Bonds or the
execution, delivery or validity of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment
Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement or the Bond Purchase Agreement or
questioning the appropriation of revenues to payment of the Bonds or the right
of the City to loan the proceeds of the Bonds to Fairview;
(j) All acts and things required under the Constitution and the laws of the
State of Minnesota to make the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement,
the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds the
valid and binding special or limited obligations of the City in accordance with
their terms will have been done upon adoption of this Resolution and execution
of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit
Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds; provided that this finding
is made solely for the purpose of estopping the City from denying the validity of
the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit
Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement or the Bonds by reason of the existence
of any facts contrary to this finding; and
(k) The City is duly organized and existing under the Constitution and the
laws of the State of Minnesota and is authorized to issue the Bonds in accordance
with the Act.
5/20/85
Section 3. Authorization and Approval of the Project, Agreement, Indenture,
Commitment Agreement, Letter of Credit Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement and
Private Placement Memorandum.
The forms of Agreement, Indenture, Commitment Agreement, Letter of Credit Agree-
ment and Bond Purchase Agreement are approved, subject to such modifications as
are deemed appropriate and consented to by the Mayor or the City Manager, which
consent shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Agreement, the
Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond
Purchase Agreement and the Bonds by the Mayor or the City Manager. The Mayor or
the City Manager is directed to execute the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commit-
ment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement.
The Council authorizes the distribution of the Private Placement Memorandum with
such variations, insertions and additions as the Mayor or the City Manager may
hereafter deem appropriate by the Underwriter to prospective purchasers of the
Certificates. Copies of all the documents shall be delivered, filed and recorded
as provided therein. The Mayor or the City Manager is also authorized and
directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect
to the transaction herein contemplated.
Section 4. The Bonds; Sale and Execution.
4.01. Authorization and Sale. The City hereby authorizes the issuance of the
Bonds in the principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 in the form and upon the
terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution, the final,amount to be
approved by the Mayor or the City Manager. _It is recognized by the City that the
initial interest rate on the Program Bonds has not been determined and is not
contained in the form of the Indenture. The Mayor or the City Manager is authorized
to approve the initial interest rate, provided that such rate is not in exess of
10% per annum. Such approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution
and delivery by the Mayor or the City Manager of the Indenture. The sale of the
Program Bonds to the Underwriter at-a price not less than 95% of the principal
amount thereof is hereby approved.
4.02. Execution. The Mayor or any acting Mayor and the City Manager or any
other officer of the City, by facsimile signatures, are hereby authorized and
directed to execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture and to
deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this Resolution,
the other documents required in the Indenture, and such other certificates,
documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect the transaction herein
contemplated.
4.03. Modifications, Absence of Officers. The approval hereby given to the
various documents referred to above includes an approval of such modifications
thereto, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and
appropriate and are consented to by the Mayor and the City Manager. The execution
of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein
authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in
accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence or disability of the Mayor or
the City Manager, any of the documents authorized by this Resolution to be
executed, may be executed by any officer of the City who, in the opinion'of
the City Attorney, may execute such documents.
Section 5. Authentication of Proceedings.
The Mayor and the City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized
and directed to furnish to the Trustee, Fairview and bond counsel certified copies
of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other
affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the
legality and marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and
records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and
all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore
furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all
statements contained therein.
Section 6. Limitations of the City's Obligations.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Bonds, the Agreement, the Indenture
or any other documents referred to in Section 1.04 hereof, the Bonds shall not
constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation, and shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than
the revenue pledged to the payment thereof, and the City shall not be subject
to any liability thereon, and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right
to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the
interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City
other than those rights and interest of the City under the Agreement which have
been pledged to the Trustee by the Indenture, and the Bonds shall not constitute
a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City
other than those rights and interests of the City under the Agreement which have
been pledged to the Trustee by the Indenture. The agreement of the City to perform
5/20/85
the covenants and other provisions contained in this Resolution, the Bonds, the
Agreement or the Indenture and the other documents listed in Section 1.04 hereof
shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues sufficient to pay
all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not
be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon other than as stated
above.
Adopted this 20th day of May, 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion.for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Council Member Bredesen and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney;_
and the following voted against the same:, none;
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed
by-the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for payment
of the following claims as Pre -List dated 5/20/85: General Fund, $273,203.67;
Park Department, $14.04; Art Center, $2,232.40; Swimming Pool Fund, $72.60; Golf
Course Fund, $16,232.49; Recreation Center Fund, $4,457.23; Gun Range Fund,
$265.34; Utility Fund, $36,657.02; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $90,592.81; Construction
Fund, $3,632.47; IMP Bond Redemption Fund, $13,218.00; IMP Bond Redemption #2,
$150.00; Total, $440,728.07; and for confirmation of the following claims dated
4/30/85: General Fund, $115,177.05; Park Fund, $2,002.08; Art Center, $878.09;
Swimming Pool Fund, $2,941.33; Golf Course Fund, $3,520..52; Recreation Center
Fund, $8,173.49; Gun Range Fund, $375.04; Utility Fund, $19,891.20; Liquor
Dispensary Fund, $226,101.21; Total, $379,060.55.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at
10:00 P. M.
Acting City Clerk
r
A-
6953 Southdale Road
Edina, Mn. 55435
9 June 1985
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Mn. 55435
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
My comments /suggestions are in regard to the Traffic Control Signal System
Improvement No. P -85 -8 S.A.P. 120- 145 -15.
A previous commitment prevents me from attending the hearing scheduled
for Monday, June 17, 1985 at 7:00 p.m.
I do not understand why the Traffic Control Signal System at West 70 Street
and Cornelia Drive is considered to be an "improvement ". It appears to
me to be a traffic control device as well as a safety measure for pedestrians.
I see absolutely no reason why the project should be funded by the School
District or by Special Assessment of the neighborhood. The intersection is
utilized by countless people and vehicles traveling east and west on 70
Street that have absolutely nothing to do with the School District or the
neighborhood. The project should be funded entirely by the City General Fund.
In your Notice of Public Hearing you make mention to the City tree trimming
assessment process. I have been a resident at 6953 Southdale Road for nearly
8 years. I have written to the Mayor and called the Forester in an attempt
to get the trees trimmed that are on city property in front and at the rear
of our property. The trees have not been trimmed. In fact, I was told
by the Forester that the trees in the 30+ year -old development have probably
never been trimmed.
Prior to moving to Edina we lived in Richfield. The trees in Richfield
were and still are trimmed on a regular basis without a request and without
an assessment process.
Sincerely,
.Yohn P. Davis
jd
cc: N. Atchison, School Board Chairperson
.P. Kohler, Neighborhood Signal Committee Chairperson
I -�
June 9, 1985
Edina city council
Subject: Improvement # P -85 -8 (Traffic light at 70th &
Cornelia)
I strongly disagree with the neighborhood assessment
alternative for funding this project.
There clearly must be something done to improve the traffic
situation on 70th St. which was caused by the traffic
rerouting as a result of closing 66th St. exit on H 100 and
putting an exchange on 70th. Installation of a traffic
light hopefully will improve the flow and safety of 70th but
the problem of turning 70th into a thoroughfare should still
be addressed. An assessment of this type is adding insult to
injury.
In summary, it's preposterous to consider making a
neighborhood pay for solving a problem they had no say in
creating and where the majority of the traffic is not local
traffic but through traffic.
Si nc rely
Keith Lucke
4444 Andover Rd.
Edina, Mn.
j -A
June 10, 1985
Edina city council
Subject: Improvement # P -85 -8 (Traffic light at 70th &
Cornelia)
I strongly disagree with the neighborhood assessment
alternative for funding this project.
There clearly must be something done to improve the traffic
situation on 70th St. which was caused by the traffic .
rerouting as a result of closing 66th St. exit on H 100 and
putting an exchange on 70th. Installation of a traffic
light hopef ul l y will improve the flow and safety of 70th but
the problem of turning 70th into a thoroughfare should still
be addressed. An assessment of this type is adding insult to
injury.
In summary, it's preposterous to consider making a
neighborhood pay for solving a problem they had no say in
creating and where the majority of the traffic is not local
traffic but through traffic.
Sincerely
KVd''& Lee Me i I I e
4421 70th St.
Edina, Mn.
ITi �
T0: F. J. Hoffman
r
FROM: Steve F. Marc
RE: 70th & Cornelia Signal
I am in favor of a "Traffic Control" at the above intersection. I feel
the city should pick up the cost since they approved the interchange
at Highway 100 and 70th which in turn made 70th Street a "$Lghway."
Because of the traffic on 70th and the problems it has caused the
neighborhood, I feel, my assessment for tax purposes should be lowered
as it has affected my property value. My taxes have gone up even though
the area is not as attractive as it once was because of the heavy use of
70th. Adjustments should be made to lower taxes rather than to place
a $42.00 assessment on home owners. The city caused the problem and
hopefully they should resolve it within the city budget structure.
Thank you.
6 -14 -s5
gn
7108 Wooddale Avenue
Edina, MN 55435
June 13, 1985
Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Traffic Control Signal System
Improvement No. P -85 -8
S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
y k
I wish to voice my objection to the manner in which the City
of Edina intends to collect the funds needed to pay for the
proposed Traffic Control Signal at West 70th Street and
Cornelia Drive.
Of the three proposed alternatives for funding the project,
A and B are more acceptable than C. As you may recall, the
area east of France Avenue was originally zoned residential,
and after several meetings with Edina officals it was zoned
commercial. The reason for the increased traffic on West 70th
Street, and therefore the need fora traffic control signal
is the existence of the commercial area. Therefor4 it seems
only fair that the merchants of the area, who are benefiting
from the traffic, pay for the improvement with a special
assessment levied upon them.
The project does not qualify as an improvement in my eyes.
It is a necessity created by the existence of the large
nearby shopping area. Personally, I will not benefit from
a Traffic Control Signal at that intersection and do not want
to pay for one.
ours very truly,
A Pa
J. McGoug , J
4512 W. 70th Street
Edina, MN 55435
June 11, 1985
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland,
City Manager
Edina City Hall
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
Because of a long scheduled vacation, I am unable to
attend the June 17, 1985 council meeting.
At the January 21, 1985 council meeting, a consensus was
reached on Mr. IFausch's recommendtions for improving safety on
70th Street. The council, its consultant and all three factions
of our committee agreed upon the ten recommendations listed in the
book titled: West 70th Street Traffic Operations and Safety
Study. Mrs. Kelly's motion to accept and implement the
consultant's recommendations was carried unanimously.
The June 17, 1985 meeting focuses on the funding of
proposal Number 3, the traffic control signal. Providing a safe
environment for its citizens is the primary domain and duty of a
city government. Funding for this signal is clearly a city matter
and should be addressed as such. A special tax assessment is not
warranted since the funds are available in the city's current
personnel budget.
The time for any squabbling ended in the passage of Mrs.
Kelly's motion on January 21, 1985. We are all honorable people
who came to an agreement on that evening. I urge you to adhere to
the letter and to the spirit of our agreement. Please pursue
vigorously the implementation of all the recommendations without
even an appearance of delay.
Thank you`,
Phyllis M. Kohler
FOR G2�DI`:G OF VAN VALKE \BtRG PARK. mr'. Rosland presented tabulation of /Ujfs,
y� le�J
,icls trom three companies for the final grading of land between Van Valkenburg Par -
and Grandview Cemetery: 1) Veit and Company, Inc., °4000 Veit Place, Rogers, Gontracting,
$9,140.00; 2) Buesing Brothers Trucking, Long Lake, MN, $9,400.00; 3) G.
Inc., Hopkins, MN, $9,500.00. Staff recommended the low bid, which is within the amount
budgeted, of $9,140.00 by Veit and Company, Inc. Member Turner's motion was seconded
by Member Kelly for award of bid to the low bidder, Veit and Company, Inc.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR 1985 TREATMENT FOR INDIANHEAD LAKE. Mr. Rosland presented the othe bid
for the Indianhead Lake treatment. The bid was in the amount of $5,481,
amount budgeted for the purchase, and it was quoted by Clean -Flo Laboratories, Inc.
Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Richards for award of this bid to Clean -
Flo Laboratories, Inc.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
cno DV"DT nrF11FNT nF ROOF ON THE SWIMMING POOL BATH HOUSE. Mr. Rosland pre-
sented quotations of bids from two companies
bathhouse: 1) Keho Construction, $9,900.00;
$16,779.00. Staff recommended the low bid of
within the amount budgeted for the purchase.
Member Richards for award of this bid to Keho
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
to replace the roof on the swimming pool
2) Falls and Nyhusmoen Construction,
$9,990.00 by Keho Construction, which is
Member Turner's motion was seconded by
Construction.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 1985, APPROVED. Member Richards'
motion to accept the reports in the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15,
1985, with no formal action was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
WEST 70TH STREET REPORT PRESENTED. Mr. Hoffman introduced Mr. Peter Fausch, Vice
President of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc., the consulting engineering firm commissioned
by the City of Edina in October of 1984 to study the traffic operations and safety
characteristics of West 70th Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue. Mr. Fausch
explained that the study considered exsiting traffic volumes, speeds, accidents, delays,
pedestrian crossing problems, school traffic and stop sign compliance. This study
was instigated because the growth in traffic on 70th Street had created some difficult
conflicts between the through traffic served by 70th Street and the residential areas
along and served by 70th Street. The level of traffic on 70th Street leaves few gaps
in through traffic for safe and convenient entering of side street traffic. Yet, the
existing 4 -way stop at Cornelia Drive which interrupt the pthrough otraffic, especially drivers.
for school related crossings, is not observed by up s
These conflicts have generated a number of requests by the neighborhood areas along
e and speed of traffic
70th Street for actions to increase safety and reduce the volum
along 70th Street. Mr. Fausch presented the following recommendations: 1) The City of
Edina should carefully review and consider the functional classification or role that
West 70th Street performs in the City of Edina street system; 2) Assuming the functional
classification of West 70th Street is to remain a collector street (no more than 14,000
vehicles per day), it is recommended that West 70th Street be striped as a two lane
roadway consistent with the standard operating capabilities of a 40 -foot wide street.
Within the striping plan, left turn lanes, improved stop lines and crosswalklearkiews
should be provided at West Shore Drive, Wooddale Avenue, Cornelia Drive,
y
Road and France Avenue; 3) Install a traffic actuated, traffic control signaldwith
pedestrian (walk /don't walk) indications at Cornelia Drive. This system
provide for pedestrian activation of the signals for use in crossing West 70th Street
to Cornelia Elementary School or other pedestrian /bicycle destinations; and 4) Upgrade
warning signs on West 70th Street,.including pavement width transition signs at Highway
100, lane control signs at all intersections to be provided with left turn lanes, stop
lines and crosswalks at West Shore Drive. With these recommendations acted upon, Mr.
Fausch pointed out that the following characteristics would probably be created:
a) Stop sign compliance and crossing safety will be improved at Cornelia Drive; due
b) Midblock speeds on 70th Street will.be reduced slightly peak
to striping and metering; c) Entering and crossing will be improved at West Shore Drive
and Wooddale through gaps created at downstream traffic signals;
d) Annual signal
maintenance costs will increase; e) Accidents will probably remain about the same at
all intersections; f) The street operation will be more consvolumeswwilltprobablycter-
istics of a collector street classification; and g)
continue to increase in relationship to the delay on 70th Street versus planned improve
and Valley View Road between the Crosstown and I -494. Mr. Fausch
ments to France Avenue
d review by a Study Advisory
reported that his study has received much input an
Committee, consisting of: Mr. Robert Burnett, Principal of Cornelia School; `Ir. Paul
Johnson, 7108 Glouchester Avenue; Mr. Donald Barck, 4807 [Jest 70th Street; Ms. Sandy
Phillips, 6817 Point Drive; sir. Harold Babb, 4701 West 70th Street; ?Ir. Gary Ms-
Patti 7004 Bristol Boulevard; "Is. Phyllis Kohler, 4512 West 70th Street;
Patti Watson, 4424 West 70th Street; Jess & Helaine Cohen, 4405 Dunham Drive.
1/21/85 _
f tir. Harold Babb, 41701 West 70th Street, said "one must pay the price to live on 70th
Street." He strongly encouraged the adoption of the consultant's presentation without
a temporary stop sign at West Shore Drive. Ms. Sandy Phillips, 6817 Point Drive, pr --
sented a letter from a Cornelia teacher which stated that the corner at West 70th <
Cornelia is always dangerous but especially in the spring when there are bike riders.
The teacher supported traffic signalization at this corner. Jess & Helaine Cohen,
4405 Dunham Drive, spoke up in support of installing a stop sign as soon as possible
at the corner of 70th Street and [Jest Shore Drive to see if this eliminates some of the
Problems. This concept was not within the consultant's report. With no further
discussion, Member Kelly's motion to accept and implement the �reco;mendations ��em the
consultant, M 71- no temporary ion s n at es
Aye conded by r Turn E
es: a s ar s, Turner, Courtney Motion car
BOARD/ COrff•fISSION APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney explained that there are
various Boards or Commissions on which there are still vacancies to be filled. He
asked the Council members to submit to him names _of persons recommended for the
following positions, so that the appointments can be made at the Council Meeting of
February 4: Board of Appeals and Adjustments, 3 -year term; Human Relations Commission,
3 -year term; Heritage Preservation Board, 2 -year term; Advisory Board of Health, 2 -year
term; South Hennepin Human Services Council. There was no further discussion.
APPOINTMENT TO STATE CHS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED. Mayor C ourtney explained that
the Edina Advisory Board of Health has recommended Dr.
Drive to be appointed to the State CHS Advisory Committee as representative from Edina.
Mayor Courtney is also recommending that Dr. Aadalen be appointed to the Edina Advisory
Board of Health when those appointments are made in February. Member Kelly's motion
that Dr. Sharon Aadalen's appointment to the State CHS Advisory Committee and the Edina
Advisory Board of Health be approved was seconded by-Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING PROJECT. Mr. Rosland reported on the Tree
Trimming Project, P- TT -03, for the boulevard trees in the northwest quadrant of the City
with assessment to the home owners. The exact location of this project is the area
bounded by Crosstown Highway to the northern boundary line and from Highway 100 to the
western boundary line (County Road 18). The estimated cost per tree is'$60; the total
number of trees to be trimmed is 1604. The total cost of the project would be $96,240.
This would be an assessed project to the homeowners with an assessment only for trees
trimmed. As recommended, Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -TT -03
1. The Park Director, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the
feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of Public
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report
is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 4, 1985, at 7:00 P. M. in the Edina City
Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improv- -nt
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, plac
and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for
two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days
from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in sub-
stantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TREE TRIMMING
IMPROVEMENT NO., P -TT -03
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, March 4, 1985,
at 7:00 P. M. to consider the following proposed tree trimming project to be done under
the authority granted by the Minnesota Statutes, Chap -ter 59, 1983 Session. Law. The
approximate cost of said project is estimated by the City as set forth below:
Estimated Cost
1604 trees x $60 $96,240
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the project P -TT -03 includes:
An area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the South, the Northern Boundary
line on the North, Highway 100 on the East and the Western Boundary Line
(County Road 18) on the West.
Marcella M. Daehn
Motion for aaoption of the resolution was secondedybylMember Kelly. A
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution'adopted.
,
T14
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -85 -8
. S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17,
1985 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set
forth below:
WEST 70TH STREET AT CORNELIA DRIVE
ESTIMATED COST
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -85 -8
S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15 $70,000.00
This hearing has been called as a result of a traffic safety study conducted
by a consultant for the City. One recommendation was to signalize the 70th
and Cornelia Drive intersection to enhance pedestrian safety in the neighbor-
hood adjacent to the school and park.
The signal installation is eligible for fifty percent funding from state aid
funding sources. The remaining fifty percent or $35,000.00 requires a local
funding source. The possible sources of local funding are the City General
Fund, School District or Special Assessment to the neighborhood. This project
is a neighborhood safety improvement similar in scope to the City Tree Trimm-
ing assessment process.
The three proposed alternatives for funding the local share of the project
are as follows:
A. City General Fund - No neighborhood assessment
(This is not normal City policy on improvement projects).
B. City General Funds and School District Funds - Fifty percent funding by
each agency. (This would be establishing a new capital joint funding
policy).
C. Special Assessment of Neighborhood - This would result in an estimated
assessment of $42.00 per single family residence. (This method of
financing local share is normally used in major improvement projects).
Obviously, City Council could use any combination of the three alternatives
listed above to finance the local share cost.
The construction of this project, if approved, is proposed to occur in the
fall of 1985. If a portion of this project is assessed, the assessments would
be levied in 1986 with the assessment payable in 1987. The area that may be
assessed is bounded approximately by West Shore Drive on the west, West 66th
Street on the north, Valley View Road and Lynmar Lane on the east, and Gilford
Drive on the south.
Page 2 of 2 Pages
City of Edina
Notice of Public Hearing
Traffic Control Signal System
Improvement No. P -85 -8
S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday.
Thank you.
Francis J ofYn,
E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH:lm
June 7, 1985
WAR DWELL ` :`
LEWIS PgRK
ILL 10-
. \ .'..; .
DR •' I '• t. ��: �1
- .p�.'Y f1 L .fi S .l ;•'�.� :may., jF'�y
ULMOM
I jm:#*15i7
DO®R
a s�•
i i t
J
r z. v-� Y i. • -rr••
•; 1pw�7f iii. }�• ��; 6:
Y,
NUMBER Z -84 -4 Brutger Co.
M
L O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
REQUEST
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.•4 }.�y� -y..' Ifs . :•ys� =,'!.s !
,' =Q
w�A�i�, Ll•< �J.,�•T4f'
.`l'_i�X.M� -fll..
�t.i�
D
K.
1..r c
�QD ✓.-
� �'
eI�Y
+ is
mk :'b.•
=
♦ - 1,
•'L
',.r � ITC � �,•.. Jk
n / y+, ,t •f �. f f �.!
•+ �'.
L O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
REQUEST
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets completed a successful season with a record of 34 wins,
4 Nsses and 4 ties; and
WHAS, the Edicia Midgets was the runner -up team in the Internationaf'Si/tolthe
Stick
Tourn ent. at Sarnia, Ontario, being the first time an American team wen
finals; and
WHEREAS, uccess has come to the members of the team because of thei extraordinary
ability, h urs of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and
WHEREAS, as epresentatives of the City of Edina, the members of a team exemplified
the highest s ndards of athletic proficiency and good sportsm ship;
NOW, THEREFORE, E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit of Edina, on behalf
of the citizenry s a whole, that the Edina Midget White A„ ckey Team be publicly
commended for thei outstanding accomplishments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV that a copy of this resolution b. entered into the Minutes
Book of the City Counc and that copies be presented the members of the team:
Sean Collins, Matt Crow, Kirk Dulac, Doug Evensor� Mark Feese, Jim Genung, Ted
Hoffman, Erik Johnson, Sea Kearney, Pat McCarthy, ohn McCoy, Rob Morris, Doug
Mostrom, Peter Perry, Dan Pe rson, Jim Turner a• Todd Willson, to Coaches Hal
Tearse and John Turner and to am Managers Ja ' Genung and Jerry Kearney.
ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1 5.
Copies of the resolution were then resente ' personally to the team captains and
each member of the team who was pres t a I to the coaches. Member Turner commented
that this was an exceptional fine group f young men who are a credit to Edina on .
and off the ice and that they and the' p ents join in thanking the Edina Hockey
Association and Mr. Kojetin and his aff 1 aking these programs possible.
MARK BERNHARDSON COMMENDED FOR OSTANDING JOB A ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland
advised that Mark Bernhardson, ssistant City Mana r, has tendered his resignation
and has accepted the positio of City Administrator i Orono\ea
Minnesota. He recalled
that Mr. Bernhardson came the.City in July of 1977 een his assistant
since he was appointed a ity Manager in October of tMr. Rosland stated
that Mr. Bernhardson h been a very helpful and stront Manager, and that
although the City sta was sorry to se e him go, that ud of his accomplish-
ments and thank him or his dedicated service to the Cosland presented
him with a silver en bearing the City logo and wished i his new position.
On behalf of th Council, Mayor Courtney expressed the in- is leaving and
also extended`C eir wishes for ctirrPcc in rho f „t __ ,
MINUTES o the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18 1985,
were ap oved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turn
AyeV Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
ion carried.
PRD -3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES PROPERTY GRANTED
V �i7 FIRST READING (ORDINANCE N0. 825 -A3). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting
Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen, Planner, recalled
that the public hearing on the Zoning Change from-R-1 to PRD -3 for the Brutger
Companies property, generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill
Road, had been continued from the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985. The request
for rezoning had been heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission
on January 2 and January 30, 1985. The site is abutted by Dewey Hill Condominiums
on the north and west and by Windwood Condominiums directly to the south. Mr. Larsen
stated that according to the City's Comprehensive Plan of 1980 the site is desig-
nated as suitable for medium density residential and this is in the range of 6 to
12 dwelling units per acre. The proponent, Brutger Companies, is requesting a
rezoning from the existing R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Resi-
dential District and have submitted a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and
24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven individual buildings.
Each individual building would contain either 4, 6 or 8 units. This would result
in an overall density for the site of 9.73 dwelling units per acre on the 5.14 acre
fr-
4/1/85
site. The plan proposes to mix traditional townhouse style of units (living space
for one family on two different floors) with a condominium style unit where all
i the living space will be on one floor. Individual units, whether townhouse or
condominium, will contain between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet of living area. The
townhouse units will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit'and the condo -
minium units will provide parking at a ratio of 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit. All
garages proposed by the site plan are attaghed. In addition to the surface parking
spaces that would be provided in front of each garage stall, there are 24 surface
parking spaces scattered thoughout the -site. All buildings are 2 -story in design
and the exterior treatment would be brick and cedar siding with asphalt shingles.
Mr. Larsen advised that the staff report of January 30 recommended approval of the
project. However, by a 6 to 3 vote the Planning Commission recommended denial of
the proposed plan. He noted that Steve Wilson of the Brutger Companies was present
to explain the proposed project further. Mr. Wilson stated that the Brutger Com-
panies is a development corporation specializing in multi - family housing. He then
outlined some of the steps they had taken in the selection of this type of project
as the best and highest use for the subject property. He pointed out that the
City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Housing Element, identifies a second theme as
the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choices
available in the City and to offer a wide range of market rate residential housing
_. _. choices. Mr. Wilson stated that they had worked closely with City staff to meet
the goal under the Plan's Land Use Element of encouraging excellence in site plan-
ing, building materials and design. The Plan also states that vacant lands in the
Cahill and 70th Street area are generally characterized by severe environmental
limitations such as slopes or poor soils and multiple residential or clustered
- housing presents- -the most logical means of land utilization. Mr. Wilson pointed
_ - out that the proposed project uses the cluster housing concept to utilize the
existing topography. They also looked at the City's 1980 Land Use Plan which shows
two primary areas within the City that have a medium density land use designation.
Within those areas they had found a mixture of apartments, townhouses and condo -
miums projects which had been constructed and had selected the clustered housing
- concept which has been well received in the housing market. Mr. Wilson added that
they had considered the requirements.established by the Zoning Ordinance as to
density and setbacks and that the proposed project is well within those guidelines.
In summary he stated that the project will be highly marketable, that it is a
quality product and will have amenities that are appealing to the people who are
going to buy the units. Tom Hunt, Carlson Mjorud Architecture, architect for the
project, then outlined the architectural elements of the project: 1) exterior to
be of brick and cedar, compatible with the surrounding area, 2) buildings would be
sited to create a park -like setting, 3) the footprint of the buildings would pro-
vide interest by use of jogs, 4) the buildings would have an animated roofscape,
and 5) landscaping would include flowering trees /shrubs to add color and interest,
with the vegetation to interface with surrounding property. Mr. Wilson then
responded to general questions from the audience. He clarified that the units
will be owner occupied, not rental, and will be designed for several types of
marketing; that the one - level, first floor units will be geared primarily for the
elderly, ' the.-one-level, second floor units would appeal to the young professionals,
and the 2 -story townhouse units would appeal to the young professional couples but
will not necessarily be geared to families; and that the questions of pets would
be a decision to be made by the association which will be formed. He added that
the setbacks requirements are 20 foot sideyard, 35 foot rear yard and 35 foot front
yard. Buildings will be sited at angles to eliminate a tunnel look. City ordi-
nance requires that garbage cans must be in an enclosure or building and will not
be seen from surrounding properties. The units are proposed to be priced from a
minimum of $95,000/100,000 to a maximum of $135,000/140,000. Bob Gunderson,
6550 York Avenue, addressed some of the issues that were raised at the Planning
Commission meeting with regard to density, integrity of neighborhood, quality of
structure, design and landscaping. In summary, he stated that the site has unique
Possibilities and that the proposed development was designed for this particular
site to meet the demand and needs of people who are looking to shift residences or
move into Edina; that the proposed project responds to the Comprehensive Plan,
meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements and follows the precedent established by
other approved developments in Edina. Mr. Wilson then responded to general ques-
tions of the Council regarding comparision of price range of the proposed units
with adjacent properties, exterior materials, windows, and lot coverage. Melvin
Gittleman stated he was the developer of Dewey Hill Condomiums, East and West and
of the proposed South building. He stated that he objected to the proposed develop-
ment for these reasons: 1) the development will be out of scale to the surround-
ing area because the site has existing three -story buildings on three sides,
2) the density is too high, 3) lot coverage not compatible with adjacent develop-
ments. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Homeowners Association, advised that
30% of the members of the Association are opposed to the proposed development and
that at its February meeting Windwood's Board of Directors had voted unanimously
-4j ij OD
to go on record in opposition. He summarized the concerns of the Windwood resi-
dents as follows: 1) the ratio of "covered" land to green area is too high,
2) increased traffic in the area, 3) detrimental effect to Windwood residents by
addition of a two -story structure so close to the property line, 4) development
would not be in keeping with "flavor" of neighborhood, and 5) concern for wildlife
of the area. Also speaking in opposition to the proposed development were
Alvyn Pope, 5601 Dewey Hill Road #210. Harley Peet, 5501 Dewey Hill Road #324;
William Harrison, 7510 Cahill Road, and Albert Levin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. No
further comment being heard, Member Turner moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A3
as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) final zoning is conditioned on
final plat, 2) developer's agreement, 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) approval
of landscaping plan. Member Turner stated she supported the rezoning because it
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan both in terms of widening the range of
housing choices and the medium density land use designation and that it meets
the requirements of PRD -3 zoning. She pointed out two concerns that should be
addressed before Second Reading: 1) landscaping to protect surrounding properties
and 2) concern for increased traffic.. Motion for granting First Reading.was
seconded by Member Kelly. Member Richards stated he would support the motion if
the proposed development were reduced in density not to exceed 44 units total for
the site. Member Bredesen commented that he would support an effort to reduce
the density to 44 units but that his biggest concern was that a landscaping plan
should be submitted that would show mature plantings and a heavily landscaped site.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
First Reading granted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO ^:'825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS':
Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the .City is amended by,adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of'the Planned Residence District {Sub- District PRD -3) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet,.pf the North 30 acres of the
NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Tow_n,ship 116, Range 21, He
County, Minnesota, according to the ..U.S. Government Survey." .
Sec. 2.. This ordinance shall be in.ull force and effect upon its passage
and publication.%
PSR- 4 ADINED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING FOR WOODHAVEN GRANTED FIRST READ-
ING (ORDINANCE° -iii, 825 -A4): Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk,
approved and-ordere "-l1 ced'on� file. Gordon Hughes, City Planner, presented the
request for zoning change m R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned
Senior Residence DistrictoQ_ haven, generally located south of Interlachen
Boulevard, west of SummitAvenue a rth of Vernon Avenue. The subject property
measures 32,500 square.,leet in 'area and' composed of three developed single
family lots. He recafled that Council had.a owed a rezoning to PRD -3 District
for this property gri March 19, 1984, for continu on of a townhouse project that
had started at the corner of Summit Avenue and Intef"i'ac en Blvd. Five of the units
were constructed and a rezoning was approved for 8 more u s to be constructed on
the subject property. This project did not receive a final p approval although
it was rezoned and construction has not and apparently will not ence. Mr. Hughes
stated that the property has now been optioned by Westminster Corpora * on for the
purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster, who op&Xates under
the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis /St. Paul, is working.with a
group of Edina churches who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. It will
be funded by the HUD 202 Program and the project will be identical to South Haven
nl r7-1 ❑ -. --, �,. .7 �'., rl.
- - .lnnnnnc TIP thn
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 29, 1985
Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -39 Planned Residential District
S -85 -5 Foster Green Addition
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road
Refer to: Attached Final Development plans and Preliminary Plat
A preliminary development plan was considered and approved by the City Council
on April 1, 1985.
The proponents have now submitted an overall development plan in support of their
request for final.zoning approval. A preliminary plat for the property has also
been submitted. The overall development plan includes a site plan, grading plan
preliminary utility layout, elevations, landscaping plan and schedule as required
by Ordinance.
At the time of preliminary approval, members of the Council stated that the
landscaping plan should provide screening for surrounding properties and that
the plan include mature stock in greater than minimum numbers. The Zoning
Ordinance requirement for this site is 50 overstory trees and a full compliment
of understory trees and shrubs. Overstory trees must be 2z inches in diameter
for deciduous trees and 6 feet in height for coniferous trees. The proponents
have submitted a landscape plan and schedule which illustrate a total of 118
overstory trees, 39 of which exceed minimum Ordinance requirements. The plan .
also includes 47 understory trees and a variety of shrubs.
Exterior elevations show brick and cedar siding with asphalt roofing. Most
ground floor wall.areas would be brick with dormers and second floor walls of
cedar siding.
..Recommendation:
-The proponents have submitted plans which conform to Ordinance requirements and
which respond to concerns raised at preliminary approval. The landscape plan,
although not as lavish as Dewey Hill, is significantly above Zoning Ordinance
minimums. The plan gives attention to perimeter screening as well as providing
a well landscaped site. The plan does rely on existing material along the
northerly boundary. Staff recommends final zoning and preliminary plat
approval, conditioned on the following:
1. Final platting
2. Subdivision dedication
3. Developers agreement
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 30, 1985
Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to y
PRD -3, Planned Residential District
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of
Dewey Hill Road
Refer to: Attached plans
The subject request was heard by the Commission at its
January 2, 1985, meeting. the request was tabled pending
submission of revised plans by the developer.
The proponent has returned with a site plan
illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on
the 5.14 acre site. There are seven building's containing
between four and eight units. Townhouse and condominium
units are mixed in all but the four -unit building which is
all townhouses. The proposal complies with all requirements
of the PRD -3 district.
The revised site plan differs significantly from the
initial submital. Total unit count has been reduced from 60
to 50 which reduces the density to 9.73 dwelling units per
acre. Building coverage which was 29.2 percent has been
reduced to 21.25 percent. Enclosed parking is provided at
a ratio of two per townhouse and 1.5 per condominium unit.
The plan also illustrates 24 surface parking spaces. The
proposed floor plans exceed zoning ordinance size minimums
for two and three bedroom units.
The exterior treatment of brick with lap siding remains
from the original proposal. However, all units are now
proposed at two stories. Units with tuck -under garages are
no longer proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff believes that the proponents have submitted a
plan that responds well to our criticism of the original
plan. 'The crowding of the site, which was our main '
criticism of the first plan, has been greatly reduced. The
new plan provides improved spacing between buildings and
allows a more open feeling for the project. The new site
plan also reduces the amount of black top on the site,
.provides guest parking throughout the site, and improves
site access for emergency vehicles.
Staff recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to
PRD -3 with the following conditions:
1. Final zoning is conditioned on final plat.
2. Developer's agreement.
3. Subdivision dedication.
OO
7.7
pf
i
,
—
1
-. ...
I
a
M
IN
i
RY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR
01 BOUNDABRUTGER COMPANY, INC.
40DZ dw
;=27;
8
------------
----- ------
:jam � ''., �I a•. � � '� I � c> �
flau-Nous suR FACE-
S.4 11 SL K, [1 1114
we
Z:
OD
...... ..............
.... ... ..........
44&
FT.
r
4
II
Unit A Unit B Unit C
L... LsrN L— L-M
e,�
� ;f=
Q 1��
SHADE TREE 0
SMALL FLOWERHO
TREE
CONFEROUS TREE
OECCUOUS SHILS efl
EVERGFIEEN SHRLO
FLOWOWGXXM
COVER
LAYM Eu
PLANT SCHEDULE
cmm a lath nom Sim I nxt ro ks
74
u; -
OVrkOr
t!1
� f
Q , I
I
` Ir ,
I
I � II I
Ir..
so
I!
C gLOcK
- - r— - - - - - - - - - - - - - Li
i.1 0 - _�_. V .i r Al
Lki AV
r ,•p � ..pct 1 I ;
� I I
d g _OOK
_ere
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
FOSTER GREEN ADDITION
..• 11.•r1 N. I..
1.iw1• 1• . .,. i�.
rl N
i
U � w
ka . m1
wN Yry w ti y...n wNr�wYw
•W.wwN • 11 ..•1.11 w�:r..
river. w. �� W,Y1 w1w•w. y Nt1 .wr.w
wu�r1.
. r..r. r Ir � Iw. w.. I ►•1 w.
11 r Yi1� 1y N r.
Yii w. Ywy . u.w Ir..
r • r.� ,. w � .Y r. 1
no r�w..
=,L...
Dyw.w
1Y.1 ra.w.s
1 w�rr � �•..� •�•• �Wrw • r w
y.AALCL_
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 14, 1985
TO: -Ken Rosland
FROM: Craig Larsen
SUBJECT: Appeal of decision by Board of Appeals and
Adjustments, B -85 -5 4528 Bruce Avenue.
On May 24, 1985 we received an appeal of a deci.sion by the Board
of Appeals, from Peter Mahon, relative to a request for a lot width
variance for 4528 Bruce Avenue.
On May 16, 1985 the Board of Appeals granted a 25 foot lot width
variance for the subject property with the following conditions:
1. That a survey verifying that the lot was
50 feet in width be provided.
2. That the Heritage Preservation Board
approve the plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit.
The first condition has been satisfied, and a copy of the survey is
enclosed for your review. The Heritage Preservation Board considered
the attached plans at its May 28, 1,985 meeting. The Board voted not
to approve the plans presented.
r
EN
aJill 1111I�1��
w ARgANCE
NUMBER B-85 -5 Thelma R. ti1cGuiggin
L O C A T 10 N 4528 Bruce Avenue, Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District
Fairway Section.
REQUEST 25 Foot Lot Width Variance
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
STAFF REPORT
MAY 16, 1985
B -85 -5 Thelma R. McGuiggin
4528 Bruce Avenue
Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District
Fairway Section.
REQUEST: 25 Foot Lot Width Variance
REFER TO: Attached area map, house plans and survey of
adjacent dwelling.
The subject property is a vacant, platted 50 foot wide lot
which is owned by the owner of the northerly adjacent
property. The Zoning Ordinance states that a platted, non-
conforming lot is not buildable without a variance if it is,
or has been held in common ownership, at any time since
October 22, 1951, with an adjacent parcel which, together,
complied with the width, depth and lot area requirements of
the Zoning Ordinance. This lot has been held in common
ownership with the adjacent lot, therefore, a 25 foot lot
width variance is requested to make it buildable.
In support of their request, the proponents have submitted a
site plan, floor plan and front elevation of a house
proposed for development of the property. The proposed plan
does comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot
coverage, building height, and all setbacks except for the
fireplace. The Ordinance allows a two foot encroachment by
fireplaces provided they not exceed 10 square feet in
horizontal area. The fireplace shown is approximately 12
square feet in area.
The subject property is the last remaining vacant parcel on
this block of Bruce Avenue. Twenty -five of 32 lots fronting
on this block of Bruce are 50 feet in width, and except for
the two northerly corner lots, the remainder measure 55 feet
in width. The attached graphic illustrates existing,
developed 50 foot lots in the.vicinity. Although there
exists a variety of lot sizes within the entire Country Club
area, individual sub -areas tend to be quite uniform.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff supports the variance request. It would grant to this
property development rights similar to that of most other
properties in the vicinity. It would not alter the
essential character or symmetry of the neighborhood. Our
concern is that of design compatibility. Since the Country
Club District is listed on the National Register of Historic
Places, we wish to insure that any house constructed on this
property would be compatible in size and architectural style
with the established architectural pattern in the District.
Therefore, we recommend approval of the variance with the
condition that, prior to the issuance of a building permit,
the Heritage Preservation Board approve the construction
Plans, and that the fireplace be modified to conform with
the Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Q.
a'
3
o.
Q;
RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATES3 INC.
REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS
7382.WASHINGTON AVENUE SO. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55344 PHONE 812- 941.3030
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Survey for G�UST,4FSot4 A SSoG • Job No 171,5-0 1 Bk 494 Pn -71
-- /3o,44
zo SCA G EE
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of CoT
COU/VT/Zy CGU6 Q- 1.i7-P /-G -7- , E/1% County, Minnesota A/J Qom,
Surveyed by ms 7 cj 1 /f 19 L�
.. /l `
RON KRUEGER'& ASSOCIATES, INC.
STATE REG. NO. 14374
h
N
j
° o .Z h s? - t„ „ P
a.
'Lo_r� tb+ wta r ® �� + _°•C1 3°� ��p z
�r 60 23'
By 3 `O t
o
W
qp _
p �. p -' -7M3 ,y� ' .rte' � -•�`d! ?• ' � � 3�u - 5e
=e �. T f' ..r _�'• n .�.Q.. 9 c. j r �G`7 as N N =
_ - n 2 .7� `4�'•!3� ..4�' � :i:4f s,
0 6b 74 lam— 1 3/ ry Qa3&
E�l 3 9 �y
' , I 4 = 4 �� = 303 6 �a 11f3 - 13 �i6 ON .
5 o /4 L L O �9 I.2[ 29 z 60 h Z a. 5
tj 1;! 3 ,
I.
w ° cs 'A Ilfll ,39.45 •
'e 5 > Z7 . '6 2B a -- �. -� - -- o 2r,,
Z7* 4a
-II 4 Giese _L28� • N '4o.fg h N
' 6 26 :3 W h 21` j . Z6 �E - 5 Ld��t
7 j ZS g3-S N '3. 2 _� Q _ '� 13 36 6
Q ;4 Jz
% ` Z4 / /4 Z¢ o' Zf G3 /35 %
Aft tmjAF
a. Z3 _ ;3° 45 r a Z 3A- p Y�13 4 $ . `- - � _. - O
ZZ 9 - m nI 2
:3B5 _ 13A3 S °
14�.T• '- 173 3 1>4� /i 1 Z/
Z/ 212. ,gyp W W.TE OA
-42 !1. i l!.: 4 2rd
- 13 .0Q. - -1 -- -dC.d•
•,:.�4 0%► ZOO G� sa
C.
3za
z•33r %� ! Z ka 13755 /Z _93 17.e7 %Z: m : Z`
! / ►: /5 t9
14: g a i
,
_
13 4
3
3. /.5 NI / l4= C
=CL:- _ % "/% s l � c 5
7o-
w v les �--�- 3z/_ -- -- '� ee - -. — 334 M �__ sass 6681 LA
h
0 22.5 o -5 = - _ fE NKi .a
=0.9 BS .
-Il�' v, o
137.44 r3� o ! Sfl;w Ta r G° Io5
Z ! SffrZ _!. OAKS
36 Z * F Z
=s.ca 3 I 5 -3
,B 4
�" 32 •F' 7 3t( jF g .� - d 20 r.
- 7
8 � 73.s
iv Z-
zl� If
Ul
; 0 5 ° ; Z -'� Z 4 OW ° - -
/4 X O - __.... - W Z/ 14
/4 9
' 6 Oi
Q W rt
s
! 134 —� 0 - - NV �s - Z0 _ p / to
/s Q A Ix 19
W) �% 03 3`!34 I•:o
;4/.4; v - � 17 -- - t '3 .44 h Q If
Z/ N 7
5 Z3 - - -.: /7. /7 N Q: a
° CIO Zzh 9 Zak
1 ', •r• !ro N -'
d 7d • . -J / �=� _ .'L,t : 3:.Q;i fJ _�`.Nyo'N , Z:i L •�3•/�9 3 /4 7 -^"R .6 . rp i+ v •. _ _ �I _ o E �' 6 ^v -t. �2o� f sac�' a-p � , - •�.: ., — am 122.5 . � � %
rcc ZJ l
7 v, y
` _ • L
M E M O R A N D U N I
DATE: May 23, 1985
TO: Heritage Preservation Board
FROM: Harold Sand
SUBJECT: Proposed dwelling 4528 Bruce Ave. Lot 15, Block 4,
Country Club District, Fairway Section, PIN 18- 028 -24 -12 -0073.
Refer To: Attached B -85 -5 staff report, site plan, floor plans and
front elevation.
This request is for a new dwelling on a vacant lot that was
previously combined with the northerly adjacent dwelling at 4526 Bruce
Ave. The lot is substandard in terms of lot width and lot area, therefore
variances are required to permit development. The Board of Appeals
and Adjustments approved a lot width variance on May 16, 1985 subject
to approval of the building plans by the Heritage Preservation Board.
The proposed dwelling is designed in the English Tudor
Revival Style, which is one of the most popular styles in the neighborhood.
The proponent has not submitted side and rear elevations at this time
so it is difficult to fully evaluate the proposal. The additional draw-
ings may be submitted prior to the HPB meeting. The exterior
materials on the structure should be clarified. The drawings seem to
indicate a vertical wood siding on portions of the structure which would
not be characteristic of the English Tudor Revival Style i
The proposed dwelling also has the attached garage facing
the street. The original design standards for the district required
that attached garages would not face the front street. Side streets and
lots that adjoin the Creek appear to be the exeptions to the rule. In
addition, more recent dwellings, perhaps without design review,
have attached garages facing the street. At the present time approx-
imately 16 percent of the dwellings have garages facing the street.
------------
Room=
I�
ILi1��91 • ,
LOL il
—
dZ;
MAN
Poll
. � � Y �.
�l �i
�+'I� \s ��f,y,•Y -A l ! N :l 5( .r�1Y l.Ar,�}
� H
TIM
DWiPJ& Ram di►1£T1Y.
o
rx
V 4t
A6 RA& F-
U. 2A
III
MAID ALCV, -RAJ
hLALE
^
- --_-' _ �� ��
^ ��
��
-~__-.
___
' |
, /
� .
�
��c _
' ------l�, _- _ -- ' �__]�
�|
|/
|
i/ --- --_-_ -___--
_- — ' - -_ .
'
_ � � � _
AIEM
I 8r2
Usl
NEW
'
Z -A
At
May 2ffl, 1985
Received 5 -24 -85
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: City Council
Re: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Appeal of Decision Made 5/16/85
In Matter of B -85 -5; 25' Lot Width Variance
The purpose of this letter is formally to appeal the Board of
Appeals and Adjustments decision to grant a 25' lot width
variance in the above - referenced matter, contingent upon
receipt of a new survey showing a lot at least 50' wide. This
appeal requests rescission of that contingent decision and the
calling of a new hearing upon completion of the required lot
survey.
With respect to the staff report, this appeal contends that:
1. The staff report describing the in- question lot was
materially incomplete insomuch as it did not have a survey
of said lot and, lacking such, relied on a 1943 survey of
the adjoining lot. Significantly, the southern lot line in
question was not identified on the survey filed in support
of the variance request.
2. Lacking a minimum description of the lot and having building
plans submitted that were not in compliance with local
building code (with respect to fireplace), the staff still
felt compelled to support the variance request. The staff
saw no need for a new survey.
3. The drawing prepared by the staff for the Board's use in
deciding the question was incorrect in showing a 7' side
set -off from the existing driveway. A 2' encroachment, the
existence of which is known and not contested, was not shown.
For the record, it appears that the planning board's staff is
making variance recommendations without requiring the minimum
physical evidence. The lot in question is not wide; two -foot
errors or inconsistencies are important.
This appeal contends that the incomplete submission of the
variance request should not have been heard by the Board.
Board of Appeals - 2 - May 20, 1985
Beyond the incomplete staff report, this appeal also contends
that the Board:
1. Acted precipitously in hearing the question with incomplete
information. One member of the Board observed the survey
inadequacy mentioned above and is on record questioning how
the issue could be addressed without a proper survey.
2. Deprived interested citizens of an open forum to hear proper
resolution of the question once minimum facts were provided
by leaving a contingency that would not be resolved in the
same forum the question was properly raised.
In short, the question now will not be resolved in the open,
in front of the Board, but will progress at the private dis-
cretion of the builder /proponent, not offering all interested
parties a chance to share the salient facts of the matter;
such facts that should have been provided with the initial
variance request.
The Board has public trust. Nothing was gained and no valid
public purpose was served in making a quick decision with
materially insufficient information. The interests of only
one party were served, to the detriment of the many other
affected residents.
This appeal requests rescission of the contingent approval and
a resubmission of an acceptable variance request upon
completion of the survey to identify the lot in question. If
such a request must be accompanied by building plans, this
appeal requests that, even though not yet approved by the
Preservation Board, such plans at least meet minimum code
requirements.. The plans presently filed are lacking in this
respect.
Finally, upon filing of acomplete variance request, a new
public hearing would then afford all interested parties the
right to hear the facts, a right not yet satisfied.
Sincerely,
14A/U &C&
Peter M. Mahon, Jr.
4530 Bruce Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota
. oe-10000S
— C
4
May 2ffl, 1985
Received 5 -24 -85
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: City Council
Re: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Appeal of Decision Made 5/16/85
In Matter of B -85 -5; 25' Lot Width Variance
The purpose of this letter is formally to appeal the Board of
Appeals and Adjustments decision to grant a 25' lot width
variance in the above - referenced matter, contingent upon
receipt of a new survey showing a lot at least 50' wide. This
appeal requests rescission of that contingent decision and the
calling of a new hearing upon completion of the required lot
survey.
With respect to the staff report, this appeal contends that:
1. The staff report describing the in- question lot was
materially incomplete insomuch as it did not have a survey
of said lot and, lacking such, relied on a 1943 survey of
the adjoining lot. Significantly, the southern lot line in
question was not identified on the survey filed in support
of the variance request.
2. Lacking a minimum description of the lot and having building
plans submitted that were not in compliance with local
building code (with respect to fireplace), the staff still
felt compelled to support the variance request. The staff
saw no need for a new survey.
3. The drawing prepared by the staff for the Board's use in
deciding the question was incorrect in showing a 7' side
set -off from the existing driveway. A 2' encroachment, the
existence of which is known and not contested, was not shown.
For the record, it appears that the planning board's staff is
making variance recommendations without requiring the minimum
physical evidence. The lot in question is not wide; two -foot
errors or inconsistencies are important.
This appeal contends that the incomplete submission of the
variance request should not have been heard by the Board.
r
aj
Board of Appeals
- 2 -
May 20, 1985
Beyond the incomplete staff report, this appeal also contends
that the Board:
1. Acted precipitously in hearing the question with incomplete
information. One member of the Board observed the survey
inadequacy mentioned above and is on record questioning how
the issue could be addressed without a proper survey.
2. Deprived interested citizens of an open forum to hear proper
resolution of the question once minimum facts were provided
by leaving a contingency that would not be resolved in the
same forum the question was properly raised.
In short, the question now will not be resolved in the open,
in front of.the Board, but will progress at the private dis-
cretion of the builder /proponent, not offering all interested
parties .a chance to share the salient facts of the matter;
such facts that should have been provided with the initial
variance request.
The Board has public trust. Nothing was gained and no valid
public purpose was served in making a quick decision with
materially insufficient information. The interests of only
one party were served, to the detriment of the many other
affected residents.
This appeal requests rescission of the contingent approval and
a resubmission of an acceptable variance request upon
completion of the survey to identify the lot in question.. If
such a request must be accompanied by building plans, this
appeal requests that, even though not yet approved by the
Preservation Board, such plans at least meet minimum code
requirements. The plans presently filed are lacking in this
respect.
Finally, upon filing of acomplete variance request, a new
public hearing would then afford all interested parties the
right to hear the facts, a right not yet satisfied.
Sincerely,
rJA /U&C&
Peter M. Mahon, Jr.
4530 Bruce Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota
-l+-
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: INSURANCE RENEWALS
DATE: June 17, 1985
I have subsequent to the distribution of my last memorandum concerning
insurance renewals dated June 14, 1985 a quotation from the League of
Minnesota Cities. In order to put the quotation in terms that are
comparable to the information you have already received, I have extracted
the rate for the property insurance coverage. I must point out, however,
that the insurance company is not willing to split out any of the
separate areas of coverage for purchase. Insurance companies for the
most part want to quote total packages.
I also want to include this note concerning the following quote: the
liquor liability is based on 1% of the gross sales, and in this instance
we are using 1984 sales figures.
Liability and Workers' Compensation $515,930
Property Insurance, $122,566
including an 8% assessment charge
Based on this new information, I feel reinforced in my recommendation for
awarding the quotation from the Home Insurance Company for the City's
Liability and Workers' Compensation coverage, and the Hartford's quotaton
for the City's property insurance coverage.
KR /sw
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1985 INSURANCE RENEWALS - LIABILITY, PROPERTY
DATE: June 14, 1985
As you are well aware, we have been working for some time on our insurance
renewals. Unfortunately, we have experienced less than positive responses
to our efforts to obtain quotations for our Liability, Workers' Compensation
and Property Insurances.
To date, we have one quote for Liability and Workers' Compensation (see
Attachment A) from Harris- Homeyer Company. This quotation is a three -line
retro in which a formula containing a loss control factor, a tax factor,
a basic factor and losses incurred are used to compute a final premium.
I am also including Attachment B which illustrates what our premium costs
would have been based on this formula using our last seven (7) years of
actual losses. Attachment C contains examples of premiums using the formula
based on projected losses of 50, 80, 110, 150, and 200 thousand dollars.
Please note that our highest amount of losses over the past seven years
have been 99,636. Attachment D is a recap of premiums the City has paid
for its Liability and Workers' Compensation coverage for the past seven
years. I am including this material for your consideration because the
premium the City would be responsible for is based on our loss experience
for the coming year.
I want to point out that we have had very good experience records for the
past seven years; assuming that the record remains the same for the
coming year, our premiums would reflect a substantial increase, but not
to the level we had anticipated. Based on information received to date,
Staff recommends awarding the renewal of Liability and Workers Compensation
coverage to Home Insurance.
In the area of property insurance, the agent representing the City received
quotes from seven companies (see Attachment E). The Staff worked with the
agent to reduce the premiums by adjusting the amount of the deductibles, but
the cost benefit of such adjustments was not viable. Therefore, Staff is
recommending the low quotation from the Hartford Company.
At this point, we still have no definite quotations for our umbrella
coverage and our Paramedic Malpractice coverage, but Staff will continue
to vigorously pursue renewals in these areas.
KR /sw
Attachments
dh
Harris- Homeyer Corr mm
P.O. Box 27106 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427
(612) 541 -1221
June 4, 1985
Ms. Ceil Smith
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Mn. 55424
Re: Home Insurance Renewal Quote
Dear Ceil:
Our quote is as follows:
One Year Combined Incurred Loss Retro
Auto, Work Comp, G.L.
Basic .210 (83,790)
LCF 1.13
Tax 1.115
Maximum 1.15 max. (508,350)
Minimum Basic x Tax
Loss Limit 150,000 Work Comp.
100,000 per line, Auto and G.L.
Standard Premium $399,000
Non - Subject $49,500
ARcLrhWeujr fi
William P. Homeyer, CPCU
John R. Harris, CPCU
Gladyne Peterson
Dorothy Metzger
Premium is payable at 40% down, 30% after three months and 30% after
six months.
Formula for Determining Premium
[$asic + (Losses x L.C.F.D x Tax = ? + non - subject premium = final premium
(83,790) _ (? x 1.13)J x 1.115 = ? + 49,500 = ? (final premium)
Examples based on past 7 years
Losses =
58,832
1984 -85
83,790 +
(58,832
x
1.132
x 1.115
= 130,756
+ 49,500
= $217,051
Losses =
62,096
1983 -84
[83,790 +
(62,096
x
1.131
x 1.115
= 171,663
+ 49,500
= $221,163
Losses =
64,890
1982 -83
[83,790 +
(64,890
x
1.13]
x 1.115
= 175,184
+ 49,500 =
$224,684
Losses =
88,880
1981 -82
D3,790 +
(88,880
x
1.13J
x 1.115
= 205,410
+ 49,500 =
$254,910
Losses =
99,636
1980 -81
L83,790 +
(99,636
x
1.13
x 1.115
= 218,963
+ 49,500 =
$268,463
Losses =
92,191
1979 -80
03,790 +
(92,191
x
1.13V
x 1.115
= 209,582
+ 49,500 =
$259,082
Losses =
65,934
1978 -79
3,790 +
(65,934
x
1.135
x 1.115
= 176,499
+ 49,500 =
$225,999
N tt
EXAMPLES BASED ON PROJECTED LOSSES
Loss
= 50,000 -
Final
Premium =
205,923.3
Loss
= 80,000 -
Final
Premium =
243,721.8
Loss
= 110,000 -
Final
Premium =
281,520.3
Loss
= 150,000 -
Final
Premium =
331,918.3
Loss
= 200,000 -
Final
Premium =
394,915.8
WORK COMP
LIABILITY
LSQUOR
AUTO
H HAckme + p
CITY OF EDINA PREMIUM RECAP
78/79 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85
1.58,705 181,731 210,006 189,035 182,212 81,482 105,443
69,933 75,208 57,756 69,046
28,107 30,901 19,227 19,509
28,945 29,390 15,452 15,172
79,289 35,153 37,965
18,170 5,872 6,512
17,676 14,100 - 14,064
TOTAL 285,690 317,230 302,441 292,762 297,347 136,607 163,984
INSURANCE COMPANIES CONTACTED FOR PROPERTY
INSURANCE PROPOSALS FOR CITY OF EDINA
1.
Hartford Insurance Company
2.
Kemper Insurance Company
3.
American International Group
( *this proposal is based on a $5,000,000
loss limit per occurrence as opposed to
full value coverage as currently written)
Zurich Insurance Company
4.
Great American Insurance Company
5.
Fireman's Fund
6.
Home Insurance Company
7.
CNA
8.
Chubb Insurance Company
9.
Northbrook Insurance Company
10.
Safeco Insurance Company
11.
St. Paul Companies
12.
Protection Mutual
13.
IRI
14.
North Star Casualty
( *$5,000 deductible, no flood &
earthquake available)
15.
John H. Crowther
16.
Appalachian Insurance Company
17.
CIGNA
rt rMC41 M v4j- C
$45,308
46,331
57,000*
62,000
73,700
Pending
85,634
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
No Quote
Very Limited
Coverage*
Pending
No Quote
No Quote
A HHchme -u� Q
CITY OF
EDINA PREMIUM
RECAP
78/79
79/80
80/81
81/82
82/83
83/84
84/85
WORK COMP
1.58,705
181,731
210,006
189,035
182,212
81,482
105,43
LIABILITY
.69,933
75,208
57,756
69,046
79,289
35,153
37,965
LIQUOR
.28,107
30,901
19,227
19,509
18,170
5,872
6,512
AUTO
28,945
29,390
15,452
15,172
17,676
14,100
- 14,064
TOTAL
285,690
317,230
302,441
292,762
297,347
136,607
163,984
NET PRUIIU14
274,222
234,003
248,308
239,780
135,119
163,984
1,jLQUEST FOR PURCIIIASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works
AA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: June 14, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1 - Van for Util.ity Department.
V -6, Auto Trans., Power Brakes & Steering
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�• Suburban Chevrolet
2. Rosedale Chevrolet
IV B
Amount-of Quote or Bid
$9,539.90
$9,936.60
Freeway Ford $10,128.00
Department Recommendation: Suburban Chevrolet $9,539.90
n-z Public Works - Utility
Signat a Department
Finance Director's Endo nt:
The recommended bid is rsem is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
N r\ (1
.
en, rinance Director
City Ma per's Endorseinent :
1. I concur with the recommendation
of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nneth ( Rosland, City Manager
.REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: -Mayor and City Council
'ROM: John Wallin, Assistant Finance Director
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: June 17, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1985 Buick LeSabre 4 door Custom
Quotations /Bids:
Com any
1. Walser Buick
2. Win Stephens
Nelson- Lenzen
Department Recommendation: Walser Buick
Amount of Quote or Bid
$11,805.00
12,063.00
13,284.00
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended b1 cis) is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
N. uaien, Finance Director
Ci�tyyMM aoer's Endorsement:
`I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
kLkl Ljc6 i rUiC i UKi:ii;JL
IV D
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURC11ASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: June 14, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Sprinkler Modifications for Community Center Parking Lots: P -14 & P -15
(Approved Previously)
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�• Green Acres Sprinkler Co.
2. Albrecht Landscape
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$8,265.00
$8,400.00 .
Department P.econ=endation: Green Acres Sprinkler Co. $8, 265.00
Public Works--Engineering
9 9
Signa ur _ Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the P urchase.
J.
en, finance Director
City M aner's Endorsement:
7. I concur with the recorn-12ndation of the De artn;
p ent and reconunend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recoir�rend as an al ternati ve : A
Kenneth Rosland, City (•lanager
0
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JUNE 11, 1985
9:00 AM
Members present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Lois Coon
Alison Fuhr
Gordon Hughes
Craig Swanson
Members absent: None
Others present: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department
SECTION A
i
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
NONE.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
NONE,
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
1. Request for traffic signal on Valley View Road at exit from Edina Junior/
Senior High School campus,
Request received from George Skluzacek, Assistant Principal, Edina High
School,
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven reported that the driveway under consideration does not have
a significant accident history, Mr. Hoffman reported that the driveway
appears to have two 20- minute problems; when school starts and when school
lets out, Additionally, Valley View Road carries a volume of approximately
3500 cars per day and the establishment of warrants would be remote. Lastly,
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
June 11, 1985
Page 2
state aid funding to assist in such a project would not be available, The
requestor, George Skluzacek, was not present at the committee meeting,
Ms. Fuhr moved that the matter be continued until July 1985., Mr. Hughes
seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0,
2. Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 40th Street at Monterey Avenue,
Request received from Roy Lewis, 4000 Monterey Avenue,
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Lewis, the requestor, requested the item be continued for one month
-to allow his participation at the meeting.
Ms. Fuhr moved that the matter be continued one month,
Ms. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
�y __9
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: WOODHAVEN FUNDING
DATE: June 14, 1985
The City Council granted preliminary rezoning approval to PSR -4 for Woodhaven
on April 1, 1985. This proposed project includes 29 units designed for
senior citizen occupancy and is located west of Summit Avenue and south of
Interlachen Boulevard. Sponsors for the project are the Community Development
Corporation (a division of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis) and
a group of Edina churches.
The attached letter from John Rocheford of CDC outlines the present status
of the project. In short, the sponsoring churches have raised 75% of their
goal of $75,000 and are now asking that the City of Edina commit $195,000
toward the project. Approval of the project by H. U. D. is expected by
October.
Edina has participated in several similar low and moderate income housing
projects; e.g. Yorkdale Townhouses, Oak Glen and Southhaven. The City has
funded the major portion of the cost necessary to acquire the.property for
these projects. It is proposed that the City fund $195,000 of the $212,000
land acquisition cost for Woodhaven.
In past cases, the City has agreed to its financial commitment at the time of
final zoning and redevelopment contract approval. In this case, a preliminary
commitment is requested to assist in securing financing from H. U. D.
If the City chooses to fund this project, most if not all of our participation
would come from CDBG funds. We currently have $178,192 in the CDBG budget
for land acquisition. The remaining funds could be provided by reprogramming
other CDBG accounts or through the tax increment process. (This site is within
the Grandview T. I. F. district.)
Staff would recommend that the City agree to a preliminary commitment of not
more than $195,000, subject to execution of an acceptable redevelopment
project at the time of final rezoning.
GH /sw
Attachment
ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS
328 West Sixth Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
Community Development Corporation
June 12, 1985
Mr. Gordon Hughes
Assistant City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
;Edina, MN 55424
Dear Gordon:
Community Development Corporation has been working with
Ministerial association to sponsor Woodhaven Non - profit
Corporation in Edina. This proposed development would
units of housing for low- income elderly persons.
612 -291 -1750
the Edina
Housing
provide 29
Funds from the Federal government, the City of Edina, and the
community must be pledged to be able to build the proposed housing.
The following commitments will be needed before the Woodhaven project
can proceed:
$1,070,000 Mortgage from the Department
of Housing and Urban Development
$ 75,000 Churches of Edina
$ 195,000 Block Grant Funds from the
City of Edina
An application for mortgage funds and for rental assistance has been
submitted on behalf of Woodhaven Non- profit Housing Corporation to the
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the proposed
elderly housing to be built on Summit Avenue in Edina. Although the
request is not certain to be funded, Edina is a_priority area to
receive such monies. Federal funds will be assigned by October, 1985.
Over $55,600 has been pledged by Edina churches through the efforts of
the Edina Ministerial Association. The group indicates $75,000 is a
realistic goal.
To complete the needed funding, Community Development Corporation, as
sponsor for Woodhaven, is now requesting a commitment from the City
of Edina for $195,000 in Block Grant Funds to make this housing
possible. Such a commitment would be subject to a redevelopment
agreement. We request that this proposal be considered at the Council
meeting on Monday, June 17, 1985.
A recipient agency of the Annual Catholic Appeal V1` M6 14
Mr. Gordon Hughes
June 12,_1985
Page 2
On behalf of the Edina Ministerial Association and Woodhaven
Non- profit Housing Corporation I wish to thank you for considering
this proposal. If you have any questions, please call me.
Sincerely,
John L. Rocfieford, Jr.
Management Director
a
bcc/ -Edina Ministerial Assoc. .
.,,,Housing Committee
Churches who have
committed funds:
Colonial Church of Edina
Normandale Lutheran Ch.
Lutheran Ch of the
Good Shepherd
Edina Community
'Lutheran Church
St. Stephens Episcopal
Church
"uT
l eEh Churchat
Christ--Presbyterian
Church
E
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT OF MANN DRIVE -IN - BLOOMINGTON
DATE: June 14, 1985
As you know, Mayor Courtney in a May 15th letter requested a joint meeting
with the Bloomington City Council concerning the above - referenced project.
Although we have not received a response from Mayor Lindau, I have spoken
with Rick Geshwiler, Bloomington City Planner, and Linda Fisher, attorney
for Homart Development Company.
Mr. Geshwiler could not, of course, commit to a meeting with the Bloomington
Council but did suggest that if such a meeting were held, it should occur
after the completion of the draft E. I. S. for the project. I agreed with
his suggestion. The E. I. S. has now been completed, and several copies
have been sent for our review. I will bring copies to Monday's Council
Meeting in the event that Council Members wish to review the document.
To date, we have received no further response from Bloomington concerning
our request for a meeting.
Ms. Fisher advised me that Homart Development Company was very willing to
make a presentation to the Edina City Council concerning the project. I
noted that we were more interested in meeting with Bloomington's Council
but that we would advise the Council of Homart's offer. If the Council is
interested, we could invite Homart for the July 1st Meeting.
GH /sw
RESOLUTION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD
WHEREAS, Homart Development Company is proposing to redevelop the-Mann.
Theatre site in the City of Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development is adjacent to County Road 17 (France
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development is very intense by City of Edina Standards;
and
WHEREAS, the current improvement of the I- 494/France interchange is underway;
and
WHEREAS, the proposed project will have a major impact on the new interchange;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is aware that completion of the new interchange will
result in additional capacity for undeveloped properties near I- 494 /France Avenue;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is concerned over the traffic impact of the proposed
project on the county and state road systems;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council urges Hennepin
County to very rigorously review the Homart EIS as to trip distribution, capacity
analysis on County intersections and interchanges, and adequacy of base line
data used to develope the above information in traffic anaylsis.
ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 15th day of July, 1985.
City Clerk
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rolland, City Manager DATE: May 22, 1985
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Domestic Disturbance Calls
As a follow -up to the March 11, 1985 meeting of the City Council and the Health
Board, the following items have been implemented:
1. The attached informational brochure is being distributed to
participants in domestic assault calls. It was provided by
Cornerstone and its generic nature should improve knowledge
of services available.
2. On May 8, 1985, a meeting between the City Manager, Chief of
Police and Cornerstone representatives was conducted. Almost
universal agreement was apparent on several discussion topics.
Additionally, Cornerstone has offered training for police
officers later. in 1985.
3. The "Edina Police.Report" featured domestic abuse during
May 1985 programming and all the major providers were featured
in the report.
If you have questions or suggestions to aid in our communication efforts, please
contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CGS:nah
PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAJ, AND SEXUAL
ABUSE CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE,
CHILD, YOUTH, ADULT, OR SENIOR,
MALE OR FEMALE
DoesAnyone Who Is ImportantToYou:
• Continually criticize you or ignore you
until you feel invisible?
• Make you feel nothing is enough, no
matter how hard you W
• Callyou dirty or demeaning names hike
crazy, stupid, etc.; make you feel "put -
down"or embarrassed in front of friends?
• Regularly threaten to leave or tell you
toleave?
• Get jealous, angry or assume you are
having sex?
• Hurt your pets, children or destroy your
personal belongings?
• Slap, push, kick, bite, pull your hair or
throw objects atyou?
• Make sexual comments about your body
or touch you so you feel uncomfortable?
• Deny the abuse; accuse you of malting it ►'
up or tell you it's your fault? j
Afterthris ha
p.pens to you the person .
wants to be kind, close and loving,
makring you think the abuse didn't
happen or it will never happen again.
But it does happen again!
If any of these things are happening to you –IT IS
NOT OKAY! ! It is okay to tell someone who can ,
help you.
There are people working in the following agen-
cies who understand how you feel and want to
help. You can call to gather information about =
your choices or just to talk.
SOUTH SUBURBAN AGENCIES DEALING
WITH DOMESTIC ABUSE
Cornerstone Advocacy Service
2200 W. Old Shakopee Rd.
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone: 884 -0330 (24 hours)
Full range of emergency services to battered
women and their children (housing, transpor-
tation, food). Also assistance in obtaining Orders
for Protection, legal advocacy, support groups
(child care provided) and information about abuse.
Serving Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and
Richfield. No fees.
Public Health Services
1900 W. Old Shakopee Rd.
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone: 887-9603 (8 -4:30 M -F)
Focus is on preventing child abuse and neglect of
children. Children and youth clinics, W.I.C. serv-
ices, parent communication seminars. Serving
Bloomington, Richfield and Edina. Sliding fee.
Side by Side
9801 Penn Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone 881 -2178 (8:30 -5:00 MT, evening
by appointment)
Full range of counseling services to adolescents,
young adults, and their families. Serving
Bloomington. Sliding fee scale, no one will be
denied service because of inability to pay.
24 hour information number for agencies
listed: 884 -0330
specific crisis numbers on back—
South Hennepin Branch
Family and Cdren's Service !
9301 Bryant Avenue South, Suite 101
Bloomington, MN 55420
Phone: 884 -7353
(8:30 -5:00 MT, eveningbyappointment)
Full range of counseling services. Groups for men,
women, incest victims. Educational series about
family violence. Serving Bloomington, Eden
Prairie, Edina and Richfield. Sliding fee /insur-
ance. Self help groups no fee.
South Hennepin
Information and Referral
9801 Penn Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431
Phone: 881 -5811 ext. 338 (8 -4:30 MA
Information about social services, counseling,
support groups and emergency services avail-
able to Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and
Richfield residents. No fees. -
Storefront/Youth Action
7145 Harriet Avenue South
Richfield, MN 55423
Phone: 861 -1675
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Phone: 926 -1851
Storefront/YMCA
8100 School Road
Eden Prairie MN 55344
Phone: 934 -776
Counselin& foryouth and their families. Special
programs for physically /sexually abused adoles-
cents, juvenile sexual offenders, and support
groups for adolescents. No fees to youth, sliding
fee scale for family counseling.
(9 -5, M -F, evening byappointment all locations.)
If You Are The Victim Of Domestic
Violence you can ask the city or county attor-
ney to file a criminal complaint. You also have the ,
right to go to court and file a petition requesting
an Order for Protection from domestic abuse
which could include the following:
A. An order restraining the abuser from further
acts of abuse;
B. An order directing the abuser to leave your
household;
C. An order preventing the abuser from entering
your residence, school, business, or place of
employment;
D. An order awarding you or the other parent
custody of, or visitation with, your minor child
or children;
E. An order directing the abuser to pay support to
you and the minor children if the abuser has a
legal obligation to do so.
(issued pursuant to M.S. 629 -34)
Emergency Housing For Battered
Women And Their Children
Cornerstone Advocacy Service
South Hennepin County ........... 884 -0330
B. Robert Lewis House
Eagan .........................452 -7288
Sojourner Shelter
Hopkins ....................... 933 -7422
7 County Metro Area.....:. ...... 646 -0994
(Collect calls and TTY access)
i
24 Hour Emergency Numbers
Child Abuse Prevention ............337
-2223
Crisis Intervention Center...........
347 -3161
Crisis Nursery ....................
729 -5500
Detoxification Center ..............
941 -0200
Sexual Violence Center
of Hennepin County ..............
824 -5555
St. Joseph's Children's Home ........
827 -6241
Suicide Line ......................
347 -2222
Youth Emergency Service (YES) ......
339 -7033
Nighttime Emergency Outreach
Network (NEON) ................
339 -0895
Other Important Numbers
Adult Protection .................. 348 -8526
Child Protection .................. 348 -3552
Order for Protection ............... 348 -5073
Bloomington Police ................. 887 -9600
Eden Prairie Public Safety .......... 937 -2700
Edina Police ..................... 925 -2242
Richfield Public Safety ............. 866 -5061
Emergency Number — Police
Fire — Medical —Abuse — 911 -
NO
CHILD
WOMAN
MAN
DBERVES TO BE
PHYSI(ALLY
EMOTIONALLY
OR
SEXUALLY
ABUSED
r I
J
Ll
-V-LJI !
MEMORANDUM
co pry a
Ham.
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: INDUCING RESOLUTION - MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
EDINBOROUGH
DATE: June 14, 1985
In conjunction with its approval of the Edinborough redevelopment contract,
the City has tentatively agreed to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds
to finance the construction of the 202 -unit senior citizen building. To
effect such an issuance, the City Council must first adopt an inducing
resolution which includes a program for the development of the project
and its financing. This program and necessary resolutions are attached.
If the City Council adopts these resolutions, then the program and an
application are submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for
approval.
The total bond issue as requested is $18.5 million. As you know, these
are revenue bonds and, therefore, are not backed by the general funds
of the City or the tax increments of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
District.
GH /sw
Attachment
i
r
- D R A F T -
City of Edina, Minnesota
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C
1. [a Minnesota limited
Partnership] [to be formed with as its
general partner and as its initial limited partner] (the
"Developer "), intends to'acquire approximately acres of
vacant land in the City of , Minnesota (the
"City ") and construct thereon a multifamily residential rental
facility to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in
part by persons and families of low and moderate income. The
site is located at 7800 York Avenue in the City. A map of the
site and legal description of the property are attached to this
Program as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The development
will contain approximately 203 housing units, at least 20% of
which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate income,"
under §103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended (the "Code ") and the Regulations thereunder.
2. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its housing revenue bonds under the Act in
a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately
$18,500,000 to finance the acquisition of the site and the
construction and equipping of the development and facilities
functionally subordinate and related to the development.
3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for the
City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock throughout
-the City, for persons residing in the City, including elderly
persons and persons of low and moderate income. The
development to be financed by the Program will assist the City
in certain problems addressed in the Housing Plan, including
(a) increasing available housing stock, (b) providing decent,
sanitary and affordable housing for elderly persons and persons
of low and moderate income and their families, [Specify others].
4. The development will be a "multifamily housing
development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of §462C.02 of the
Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd. 4 of §462C.05 of the Act.
The income limitations set forth in' Subd. 2 of §462C.05 of the
Act will not apply to this development. In addition, as
discussed in paragraph 1 of this Program, at least 20% of the
units will be rented or availabale for rental to persons of low
and moderate income; that is, with incomes not greater than 80%
of the median family income as estimated by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical
area in which the City is located, currently $26,800.
5. To finance the development, the City intends to
issue its housing revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in a
maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000
(the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to
the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which the
Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to repay
the Bonds. The Bonds will be a limited obligation of the City,
payable solely from revenues derived from the revenue agreement
and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be
secured by a mortgage and security interest in the development,
or by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one or
more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage loan or the
Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices.
-2-
h
CERTIFICATION
Multifamily
OF MINUTES RELATING TO
Housing Revenue Bonds
Project)
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held
on Monday, June 17, 1985, at o'clock P.M. at the City
Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION
OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify
that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have
been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by
the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of June, 1985.
(SEAL)
Signature
Name and Title
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION
OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. By the provisions of the Act, the City is
authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or
obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more
multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which
revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the
revenues of the development.
1.2. The City has developed a housing plan and, after
holding a public hearing thereon after notice published at
least thirty days prior thereto, has adopted the housing plan
and submitted it for review to the Metropolitan Council and has
received its comments.
1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan,
administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one
or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2,
3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a
program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6
of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon,
and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the
Agency), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the-Act, on the
basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the
Act.
1.4. This Council has received a proposal that the
Municipality finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed
multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C, as amended (the Act), consisting of the
acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon
of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203
housing units together with parking and other functionally
related and subordinate facilities (the Development), to be
located in the City at 7800 York Avenue. The developer and
owner of the Development will be a limited partnership to be
formed (the Developer), whose general partner or partners will
-2-
be Partners for Senior Communities, an Illinois partnership, or
Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation,
(Partners), or one or more of the following partners or
shareholders of Partners: Henry Hyatt, Daniel Epstein, Sheldon
Baskin, William De Woskin or Manuel Kramer.
1.5. The City has caused to be prepared a program
with respect to the Development and its financing (the
Program). At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on
June 17, 1985, in accordance with the Act and Section 103(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, on the proposal
to undertake the Program and finance the Development, all
parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity
to express their views with respect to the proposal to
undertake the Program and finance the Development, and
interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written
comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
1.6. The Developer has requested that the City issue
its revenue bonds in one or more series pursuant to the
authority of the Act in a maximum aggregate principal amount of
approximately $18,500,000, to finance all or a portion of the
costs of the Development, and to make the proceeds of the bonds
available to the Developer for the acquisition, construction
and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the
Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the
bonds.
1.7. The City has been advised by the Developer that
conventional commercial financing is available to pay the
capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at
such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development
and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would
be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal
financing the Development can be constructed as designed and
its operation can be made more economically feasible.
1.8. This Council has been advised by representatives
of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, that on the basis of information
available to them and their discussions with'the Developer and
potential purchasers of tax - exempt bonds, the Bonds could be
sold at favorable rates and terms to finance the Project.
1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not
be pledged to or-,,responsible for the payment of the principal
of, or premium or interest on the bonds.
-3-
SECTION 2
2.1. On the basis of the information given the City
to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the City to
issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to
finance the Development in the maximum aggregate principal
amount of approximately $18,500,000.
2.2. It is determined to proceed with the Development
and its financing and this Council hereby declares its present
intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under the Act
to finance the Development. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to
establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its
City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue
bonds. The City.retains the right in its sole discretion to
withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds
should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof
determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to
issue the Bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be
unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the
financing or as to the terms and conditions of any of the
documents required for the transaction. All details of such
revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall
be subject to reveiw and approval of the Program by the Agency
and may be subject to such further conditions as the City may
specify. The bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge,
lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of
the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the
payment thereof, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall
recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon,
is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically
pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt
of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or
statutory limitation.
2.3. The Program is hereby approved, and in
accordance with Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act, the
City Manager is.hereby authorized and directed to cause the
Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval.
The City Manager, City Attorney, and other officers, employees
and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to
provide the Agency with any preliminary information needed for
this purpose.
2.4. Pursuant to Subdivision 1 of Section 462C.07 of
the Act, in the making of the loan to finance acquisition,
construction and equipment of the Project and in the issuance
of the bonds or other obligations of the City, the City may
-4-
exercise, within its corporate limits, any of the powers the
Agency may exercise under Chapter 462A, Minnesota Statutes,
without limitation under the provisions of Chapter 475,
Minnesota Statutes.
2.5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby
determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred
by the City in connection with the Program and the Development,
whether or not the Development is carried to completion,
whether or not the Program is approved by the Agency, and
whether or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance
of the bonds, will be paid by the Developer upon request.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Edina this 17th'day of June, 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member ,
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk.
-5-
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held
on Monday, June 17, 1985, at o'clock P.M. at the City
Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION
OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify
that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have
been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at*said meeting, so far as they
relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by
the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of June, 1985.
(SEAL)
Signature
Name and Title
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AU'T'HORIZING SUBMISSION
OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR
REVIEW AND APPROVAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. By the provisions of the Act, the City is
authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or
obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more
multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which
revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the
revenues of the development.
1.2. The City has developed a housing plan and, after
holding a public hearing thereon after notice published at
least thirty days prior thereto, has adopted the housing plan
and submitted it for review to the Metropolitan Council and has
received its comments.
1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan,
administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one
or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2,
-3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a
program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6
of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon,
and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the
Agency), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the
basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the
Act.
1.4. This Council has received a proposal that the
Municipality finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed
multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C, as amended (the Act), consisting of the
acquisition of land from the East Edina Housing Foundation, a
Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the Foundation) and the
construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental
facility containing approximately 203 housing units together
with parking and other functionally related and subordinate
facilities (the Development), to be located in the City at 7800
York Avenue. The developer and owner of the Development will
-2-
be a limited partnership to be formed (the Developer), whose
general partner or partners will be Partners for Senior
Communities, an Illinois partnership, or Partners for Senior
Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation, (Partners), or one
or more of the following partners or shareholders of Partners:
Henry Hyatt, Daniel Epstein, Sheldon Baskin, William De Woskin
or Manuel Kramer.
1.5. The City has caused to be prepared a program
with respect to the Development and its financing (the
Program). At a public hear .ing, duly noticed and held on
June 17,1985, in accordance with.the Act_and Section 103(k) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, on the proposal
to undertake the Program and finance the Development, all
parties who appeared at-the hearing were given an opportunity
to- express their views with respect to the proposal to
undertake the Program and finance the Development, and
interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written
comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
1.6. The Developer has requested that the City issue
its revenue bonds in one or more series pursuant to the
authority of the Act in a maximum aggregate principal amount of
approximately $18,500,000, to finance all or a portion of the
costs of the Development, and to make the proceeds of the bonds
available to the Developer for the acquisition, construction
and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the
Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the
bonds.
1.7. The City has been advised by the Developer that
conventional commercial financing is available to pay the
capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at
such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development
and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would
be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal
financing the Development can be constructed; as designed and
its operation can be made more economically feasible.
1.8. This Council has been advised,"by. representatives
of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of
Minneapolis, Minnesota,,.that on the basis of information
available to them and-their discussions with. the Developer and
potential purchasers of tax- exempt bonds, the bonds could be
sold at favorable rates and terms to finance the Project.
1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not
be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal
of, or premium or interest on the bonds.
-3-
SECTION 2
2.1. On the basis of the information given the City
to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the City to
issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to
finance the Development in the maximum aggregate principal
amount of approximately $18,500,000.
2.2. It is determined to proceed with the Development
and its financing -and this Council hereby declares its present
intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under the Act
to finance the Development, provided that the Developer enters
into an agreement with the Foundation to acquire the land for
purposes I of constructing the Development. Notwithstanding the
foregoing,.however,' the adoption of this resolution shall not
be deemed to establish a,legal obligation on the part of the
City or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of
such revenue bonds. The City retains the right in its sole
discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not
issue the bonds should the City at any time prior to the
issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of
the City not to issue the bonds, or should the parties to the
transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring
of the financing or as to.the terms and conditions of any of
the documents required for the, transaction. All details of
such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof
shall be subject to reveiw.and approval of the Program by the
Agency and may be subject to such further conditions as the
City may specify. The bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a
charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any
property of the City, except the revenues of the Development
specifically pledged to the payment thereof; and each bond,
when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the
bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the
revenues of the Development and property specifically pledged
under the revenue agreement to the payment thereof, and shall
not constitute a debt of. the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation.
2.3. The Program is hereby approved, and in
accordance with Section 462C.04`, Subdivision 2 of the Act, the
City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause the
Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval.
The City Manager, City Attorney, and other officers, employees
and agents -of the City are hereby authorized and directed to
provide the Agency with any preliminary information needed for
this purpose.
2.4. Pursuant to Subdivision 1 of Section 462C.07 of
the Act, in the making of the loan to finance acquisition,
-4-
construction and 'equipment of the Project and in the issuance
of the bonds or other obligations.of the City, the City may
exercise, within its corporate, limits, any of'the powers the
Agency may.exercise,under`Chapter 462A, Minnesota statutes,
without limitation under the provisions of Chapter 475,
Minnesota Statutes.
2.5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby
determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred
by the City in connection with the Program and the Development,
whether or not the Development is carried to completion,
whether =or not the Program is I approved by the Agency, and
whether'or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance
of the bonds, will be paid by the Developer upon request.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Edina this 17th day of 'June, 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing
resolution was duly seconded by Member ,
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk.
-5-
V
198 5 1 CF EO INA
7 i r
r
CHECK N0. DATE
r
v
M
r
155368 06/10 /
9,
r
1.
;s
ti
r
s
CHECK ISTER
AUMIAIT VCAIn R2 TTCU nCCrCTCTTn.',
06 -17 'AGE 1
■r�nn ..T un Tuu o n ucee.cr
4
E5
21476.64
MUTUAL BENEFIT
LONG TERM CISABILITY
10- 4158 - 510 -51
MANUAL
21476.64 *
* ** -CKS
155731
-16/101E5
539126 *90
NOPWEST EANK
BCNC FAYMENT
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
539126.00 *
• +� -CKS
157251
06/10/85
1359000.00
EDINA HRA
DLE FROM HRA
10- 1145 - 000 -00
MANUAL
I
1 35 9000.0 0
,
rr *fa
CKS
1 152588
6/12/85
224.40
WESTERN LIFE
EMPLOYER CCNST
10- 4157 - 510 -51
MANUAL`
224.40 *
*er! **
! ++ -CKS
1 1628-,
C. 6/12/85
29007.00
FISTMASTER
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
29000.10 *
* *r -CKS
165512
06/11/E5
54.87
S T ROBB
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
155512
06/11/85
7.05
S T 2088
REPAIR PARTS
1iL -4540- 646 -64
165512
06/11/F5
5.36
S T ROBB
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 646 -64
67.28 •
fa * * **
+•+ -CKS
166CU.3
C6/C7/85
64.30
ALBINSON
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
64.?0
1680U4
06/06/E5
119.67
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 440 -44
163074
06/06/85
10.94
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 482 -48
_�- 1.6d9U4
G6,/G6/85
156.48
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 520 -52
158004
06/C6/85
17.25
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 628 -62
168UG4
(WG6 /8`
129. ^8
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
27 -4262- 661 -66
166004
C6/C6/95
35.42
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 821 -82
1660114
UW6185
77.56
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 841 -84
168004
06/C6/85
57.64
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50.4262- 861 -86
- - -- - -
- --
605,04 *
168'0 C'5
C6/C4/85
37.25
AUDIO GROUP
ACVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -E2
168UC5
CO/04/85
37.25
AUCIO GROUD
ADVERTISING
50- 4214- 862 -86
74.50 *
---- r•*r*r
* ** -CKS
1680x7
06/05/85
22.00
APEX PEST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
22.00
168008
06/04/85
49982
KAMAN BEARING 8 SPLY
REPAIR PAPATS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
4
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -85 PAGE 2
rHFCI( AI?_ (1ATF AmnuSIT y, -wn r7 tTVM 11CSrGTPTTnIU ArrnnA:T un_ TA1I_ A 0 - x uccc .r_:
2
1680x8
C6/10/?!5
51. °,2
KAMAN BEARING R SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2
--- -..... - _ - -- - -- _ -- _._-
_�.�1_. b y
4
4
'
16b009
Lb/11/85
4'.15
ASTLEFORC EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
- - - --
°
4.15
•
9
7
°
0
ff #r•r
#ff -CKS
D
:O
O
168(212
:6/11/85
14.')0
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
"
168012
^6/x-7/85
14.00
AUTOMUBILE SERVICE C
CUNT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
28.'0
f
is
4
168013
06/11/85
72.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 44C -44
;s
"
1681.3C6/10
/E_:
_4Z, 52
'A ERNATCR RE?
GEN SUPPI.Z
10- 4504 - 440;44
zo
168C13
;6 /1C /85
176.85
.TLD
ALTERNATCR REP-UILD
REPAIR, PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
- _
6
2i
17
168 ^13
C6 11U /85
60.00
AL TERNA TCR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4540- 560 -56
27
10
168013
06/10/85
!l of
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR FARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
zx
'B
168!`13
L6/1I/E5
17.34
.,ALTERNIATC4 REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80
_
-
20
21
168013
__ - -• - --
i-�6 /1G 195
._..-
28.30
428,81
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
•
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -EG
7
,R
Z2
23
za
tAffff
-
- -
fff -CKS
-
2c
31
32
168015
06/04/85
72.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
T?
168015
C6/12/85
13.41
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
27
AT 8 T INFO S Y S T F M
TELEPHONE
23- 4256-611 -61
20
168015
Co/12/85
36.94
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHCNE
27- 4256- 661 -66
3^
2'
3C
162.75
#'
3-
4
3.
+ #• -CKS
-- 168018
,- _C.6 /1Z /P_5
4,50
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
--USE.EHCNE
29-4256-721-72
r.
44
34
168U16
^_6/12/85
9.7(I
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
40- 42`.6- 801 -8G
_
-
3'
1bb018
Ub/12/R5
4.50
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256- 821 -82
`
16
6.R ^18
C611d/85
7.32
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
`.0- 42'.6- 841 -84
47
4p
3'
168018
L6/12/85
9.0D
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256- 861 -86
�e
00
30
34.32
nc
7i
e0
- - - - --
+ ++-CKS
42 -
o_8C44 06/10/05
42.40
ARTISTA N
PRIN NG
23 -46C0- 610 -61
1n
A3
44
42.40
+
I�p
3
45
-_ ___._1.68Q2.5��_Cib/._i_Q1.E.�_
28.00
ALFONS ANOERSSON
CAT SERV
27- 4200 - 661 -66
R
47
40
be'12�
bLt1 /85
4 551 R0
RADGEP METER INC
WATER METERS
40 1220 - 000 -00
92
P3
R4
40
loSO26 06/04185 235.47 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 807 -80
°O
71
49787.47
]
ez
73
f f t i A i
Af• -CKS
c•
]C
04
-6 d.U1R
0AL11 R5
671 .25
RFFR WHOLE SAL RS
INVENTORY
27- 4630 - 664 -66
72
168028
06/11/85
2T 701.95
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY -,
50- 4630- 822 -82
'3
166028
U6/12/85
4,587.85
BEER WHOLE SALERS
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
7
']
1SP5
Y
OF �DINA
3.708.35
BFER WHOLESALERS
INVFNTORV
rurry
•n_
nATr Bunn.,•
CHECI ,ISTER CE -17- PAGE 3
Vr..n ID TTC4 nfCn
-- - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - --------- - - - - -- -
,I
168029
06111/85
3.708.35
BFER WHOLESALERS
INVFNTORV
50- 4630- 862 -fE
— - -- - - -
-- -- --
11 .669.4 0 +
16bu?9
C6/11/F5
129.35
BERG 8 FARNHAM CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -3C
1661_29
"6/11/85
129.35
BcRG 8 FARNHAM CO
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
258.70 +
._._-
f•• -ft+ ________..__._.__._
-__
�_._.- _ -___.
•• +-CKS
168J34
06/1u/85
114.19
BLOOMINGTON CHP•Y -PLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
166034_
u6/10/85
11R.52
BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
168034
f;6/11/ ?5
29.47
BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY
PARTS
104620- 60 -56
°
°
262.1 T +
••• -CKS
168136
06/12/85
100. ^0
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICE
10- 4100- 420 -42
'
100.00 +
16.39 -_
_ L6/11?/85 u_
_ �. 616_.29
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
RIP RAP
10 -4548- 358 -30
616.29 f
-
•itt ++
* +• -CKS
168041
"6/12/85
1976.9.55
BURY 8 CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 301 -30
166G411.6/1.2/95�
11 121.25
BURY 8 CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 314 -30
1 SC 41
C6/10 /?5
5,001.85
BURY 8 CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524- 314 -3C
17,891.65
..• +i t
• +* -CKS
[6/1!18-
44.50
B 8 9 SEAT COVER
CCNT REPAIRS
1D- 4248 -560 56
44.50 +
-- -`-
fttt.•
.•• -CKS
168 C4 7
06/10/85
453.30
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUFFLIES
10- 4508- 422 -42
___
I(-dQ47 -
16/10/85
45.40-
BROWN PHOTO
CREDIT
10 -4508- 422 -42
407.90 +
--
t•rt••
••• -CKS
168053
06/10/85
327.12
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
10 -4250- 301 -30
168C53_ . -_
-5-
Q6/10185
83.22
PROWNTNG FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10- 425_0- 44_6 -44
16bb
6/10 /F5
151.34
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
IC -4250- 520 -52
168C53
u6/10/ ?5
327.12
ERCWNING FERRIS
REFLSE COLLECTION
10- 4250 - 540 -54
168053
^6/10/85
60.00
PROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
10- 4250 - 628 -62
168125
QE /10/85
47.51
EROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10- 4250 - 646 -64
168053
06/10/E5
123.04
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
10- 4250- E46 -64
168053 __,____
rb /10 /?5
29.42
PR OWNING FERRIS
REFLSE C {LLECTICN
23- 4250- 61_1 -6E
16FC53
�16/10 1 E5
152.23
BROWNING F_RRTS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
27- 4250 - 661 -66 _ -
168 ^ -53
u6 /1u /85
43.04
PROWN?NG FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
27- 4250 - 662 -66
1613053
^0/10/ ?5
47.24
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
28 -4250- 708 -7C
168053
1E805?
06/1U/85
06/10/85
276.97
368.98
BROWNING FERRIS
BROWNING FERRIS
REFLSE CCLLECTION
REFUSE CCLLECTICN
50 -425C- 841 -84
50- 4250- 861 -86
-- - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - --------- - - - - -- -
,I
19F5 CITY OF ED INA
`l
ru rr n°TC •unnu•
CHECK REGISTER
nnn
C6 -17 -85 PAGE 4 s
,
2
3
�ylo6C54
29041.23 •
2
3
4
"6/10'/8_
41.63
P.ATTERYuWAREHOUSE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
5
'
168054
i6/12/E5
76.00
PATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
°
°
169 05 4
^6/10/85
125'.50
PATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
°
168Q54
L6/10/E5
97.99
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
1C -4620- 560 -56
°
166054
U6/10 /85
124.56
PATTERY UAREi4.nuSE
P, ARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
9
- - -- -- - -
- - -- -- - --
__465..68 +
2
10
11
,x
•..f.f
--
ttt -CKS
,
,r
I
168C56
06/11/85
610,120
8 H K & R INC
INSURANCE
10- 4260- 510 -51
"
14
15
610.00 •
,c
1_
16
n
-__._. _-. -_
+ ++ -CKS
2-1
06/12/85_
10.70
WAYNE BENNETT
PC ICS' SERVICE
10- 4100- 420 -42
a
a0
100.')0
laf.
z1
-iff �•fa - -` -
-- ---- --
rtt -C
7r
-KS ---
- -
z
Z3
168�EQ
�6/101E5
164.60
AMBASSADCR SAUSAGE
CCNCESSICNS
27- 4624- 664 -66
`°
164.60
Z5
2e
27
CKS
3'
] `
'°
xe
30
108062
6/07/ ?5
30. ?2
30 . 8 2 +
EROCK WHITE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
_
:1
31
32
• ++-CKS
Al
13
20.30
[ULLIGAN
CONT SEEN
10- 4200- 482 -48
4
4..
34
168 ^65
C'�/11/r5
13 ?.7o
CULLIGAN
GEN SUPPLIES
50 -45C4- 821 -82
]'
]B
]7
]°
f f t i t f
158.30 •
iff -CKS 14"
4:
47
nr
_ n
39__.--
]6.c.C.7_iL- .__.____0.6/
? /f5
44.40
CARLSON TH RMO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 45/i0- 803 -8C
�-
40
41
44.40 •
.a
62
43
*A*-CKS
S°
e.
n4
166U73
06/11/85
32.87
CITY BEER
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
r
9°
_- �_16EU7.:______-
Sl6 /1.2.tf5
15.1 al
CITY BFEA
IKVw, -o.gY _
51! -4630- 842 -84
46
47
4e
1630 ?3
06/1'1/85
73.18
2 62.20
CITY BEER
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
ra
n9
t ■ k i f .
rtt -CKS
F.-5
.43
CLANCY 0 -Q IN .0
G -- sVEPUSS
10- 4504- 260 -2
52
1o0075
-'6/ M / ?`_
4.50
CLANCY DPUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
-6
10- 4504 - 420-42
n
'3
10875
06/10/85
24.75
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
7O
_6 L3.5
06/10/E`.
7.18
CLANCY DRUG TNC
GEN SUPPLIES
10-45C4-627-62
7.
'=
168c75
06/10125
4.15
CLANCY DRUG INC
PHOTO SLFFLIES
10- 4508200 -2C
'6
7
60.31 +
74
7'1
1985 Y CF EOINA
CHECK NC. CATE ANOUNT
z
w .
� s
CHECF ISTER 06 -17- PAGE 5
ur Nn no TTrw MC1ZrOT0?T11A1 APPfl11AIT Un- rR1. . e n A Yf0[.'r
• t f R f •
+•• -CKS
168u78
C6/11/85
448.25
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
168_C78
06/12/85
785.95
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTCRY
50 -4632- 842 -84
108078
06/11/85
19102.55
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
29336.75 *
* ** -CKS
16d78'i
_6 /1C /E5
3.096.59
CONT- M.INN
CCNCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
39096.59 *
168081
76/11/85
_- .- ---- - - - -_-
27.25 _
CONT SAFETY EQUIP
SAFETY EGLIP
10 -4642- 301 -3C
27.25 •
- - - --
166851
^6/12/E5
15.010*
MARTHA UNDQUIST _.._ -_.
10- 3500 - 000 -CC
168002
06/12/85
47.25
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 440 -44
_
168CR2
(6/12/85
25.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 44C -44
168r62_
„-- ,L6/12/E5
39.00 _
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EGUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 440 -44
168Ca2
jo/12/'?5
65.70
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 44C -44
168 ^82
C6 /11/85
1.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 540 -54
166 [32
L6/11/85
30.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 54C -54
168982
[6/11/85
1.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPP
10 -45(24- 540 -54
168082
06/11/85
46.CO
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPP_'LIES
10- 4504- 56C -56
1660F2
6/r7 ie5
76.00
C ONWAX FIpE & SAFETY
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
168082
X6/11/85
.175.00
C)PIWeY FiPE 8 SAFETY
PARTS
110 -462[- 560 -56
- _
1680 2
f- 6/12/8'
3.5^
CONWAY FIR= & SAFETY
SAFETY EGLIF
10- 4642- 642 -64
168062
06/12/95
1.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
SAFETY EGLIP
10 -4642- 646 -64
1680 P2
C6112/E5
3.50
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
SAFETY EQUIP
1 -6-4-6-2- 646 -64
168082
L,6/1C/65
9.25
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
FIRE EQUIP
10- 4918 - 629 -62
__ 168 - 782__-
_- �6/11/P5
50.50
CONWAY FIRE R SAFETY
EGUIP MAINT
i8 -4274- 70_8 -70
168!'62
C6/11 1E5
1.75
CONWAY FIPE & SAFETY
FIRE PR= VENTICN
29- 4650 - 721 -72
y�
168002
i6 /11 /E5
52.50
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPPLIES
410- 4504- 801 -8C
166x82
u6/11185
7.90
CONWAY FIP_ & SAFETY
CCNT REPAIRS
50- 4248 - 821 -82
168082
u6 /11/85
56.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
CONT REPAIRTS
50 -4 8- 841 -84
168082
r16 /11 /E5
3.50
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
CCNT REPAIRS
5C- 4248 - 861 -86
698.95 *
- - - ---
••fr►a
• *• -CKS
168C9U
1061 CA 185
212.93
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
166091
06 /C7 /E5
111.62
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
166 9Q_
06/x7/85
111.62
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR FARTS
10 -454C- 560 -56
166`:
L6/�-,7•/65
89.39
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR FARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
525.56 +
■ f f • f •
+•• -CKS
_ -_ 1- 6,ia91 -_
- - -
U6/r4185
34.45
COURTNEY C WAYM1IE
MILEAGE
10 =4208- 100 -10
34.45 *
-
. * f f i •
••• -CKS
16d099
L6/10/85
123.22
CUSMMAN MOTOR CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
'*"5 r/Tv OF n �j,
c*ccv x:. E _'
1re^. +
1^6,,6
lbvn�»
. 16u if' ,
4 murr
/ 1au1c
.. __
|
l- -
*
coscx soIsr:_'n c6-1r~o5 pucE o
�oun -
------- --- W7 mn nlj ---------/'� QC/WI-���_J��.-w-�.o._x pcssxG-_
1a3 �z
.
^^^-cxs |`
,
a/1, 1/P 5
---------'-----------------------'---------------------- - ---_- _-_' ^^°-c«S
126 .97 n^moocx
- u-' sr INC znvcmrosv 50-4630-822-«2
��� - ����L4xzp
i�
~^^',"" '
86.17 ozcscL yc�xzcr cu enru
uu',r ^
14
10-4620-560-5: | ~
-------' --- -_|'
'
. .�
13- .72 � wr'RTT -SUPPLY ------------G-N SUPPLIES -----'-'---15~mc*-3,')1-3,Z'-
/1 `6ulo 6/1,1 /85 113 .n0 nsxzr Suppu CLEAN cupe/Ez 10-4512-54C-54 |
����z� 'u/��'f - '
'— - ' ro~��au-���~��
/
1681 25 'w1e? 5 � »nz 15 -^ -
.| �uu��, -��c»��: ,cm,^�n n�m/ u»pr�r ncw uupp za.*�o+»u��o�---- - - ---- -
|-| " ^ ~c»rr y«�p�v c�cwmms cop��zco �o~4y1a~roa~vu | '-
2 9- 752.62��-_-_-________--__--____'-_-_---___--_-_'
.| 1^ylu �6nnE 5 *x3.00 oxozS su,swE7 WEED comTnnL au~wcO~vnx~vJ /
` mm26 ,6 /°2/� F�
' � -----'-----'---------------------'-
511 75
.� ! cws
� ^y � � � "/ e� y�./�
`
onmzoc ScnvIccz czmI *Epoms 5o~4z4o-ow~o� �
�
°^^-cnS
- - ------'------ |
� u /u ` -------- ----
J �«u,�� �a/��/"5 5oa.4 s cA"� F Awncxoc.. osv SUPPLIES 10_4 5 C 4-2 6 0- 2 6--
| _
| n -6/�4' /95 154.3? cu»L �r -*wpcnucm ncp^zn FARTS 1o~m4�O-�o�47 a~a^ �m36
166136 J6/C7,/85 ,op./o EARL poNDc�Scm
!
sz z~�a -------- ''
.
992.95 ° - - �'' --~ -L
)!
' ` =
[^*L-_rR_H/mImn P
POLICE O
Ozf1CV~42o-�2
CIA HL- n
nn H
Loma o
ocnxI � 0
0 ~*12 0- 18 *~lo
cu/,6 /E 9
_21 If) .�_-_---_r^LE-GRcEN u
_��ypxwy s
s�� �
u
10~45� �
*~J�e-0
�6/r6/o5 r
rr.rn o
o�/s o
onccw C
COMPANY -
`w u
uuppLIc 1
1o~4 50 4~3 5 2 ~3 o
�6 /'u/o5 3
3 4 .n0 n
nmc o
onccm c
c31pemr o
oco o
oL^cv oInr 1
10~*562-353-30
�6 /`6 5 5
53.09 -____c^Lc_GPccN_coMPumr -
-__-_sco B
BLACK cIyl 1
10~45e2~6*2^64 �
y/o� ,
,^.-o O
OIL s
spcCn c
crpPAwv s
sco o
owc"-cz;T -----'--10~45e2-646-64 -
--
cu/.ms� 3
36. c C
C Ls s
s1cEv c
cow"«nr G
G-w s
suppLIcs 4
40~*5c4~303~8c
`0 1 ,6 /o5*2 .
.
a/1, 1/P 5
---------'-----------------------'---------------------- - ---_- _-_' ^^°-c«S
126 .97 n^moocx
- u-' sr INC znvcmrosv 50-4630-822-«2
��� - ����L4xzp
i�
~^^',"" '
86.17 ozcscL yc�xzcr cu enru
uu',r ^
14
10-4620-560-5: | ~
-------' --- -_|'
'
. .�
13- .72 � wr'RTT -SUPPLY ------------G-N SUPPLIES -----'-'---15~mc*-3,')1-3,Z'-
/1 `6ulo 6/1,1 /85 113 .n0 nsxzr Suppu CLEAN cupe/Ez 10-4512-54C-54 |
����z� 'u/��'f - '
'— - ' ro~��au-���~��
/
1681 25 'w1e? 5 � »nz 15 -^ -
.| �uu��, -��c»��: ,cm,^�n n�m/ u»pr�r ncw uupp za.*�o+»u��o�---- - - ---- -
|-| " ^ ~c»rr y«�p�v c�cwmms cop��zco �o~4y1a~roa~vu | '-
2 9- 752.62��-_-_-________--__--____'-_-_---___--_-_'
.| 1^ylu �6nnE 5 *x3.00 oxozS su,swE7 WEED comTnnL au~wcO~vnx~vJ /
` mm26 ,6 /°2/� F�
' � -----'-----'---------------------'-
511 75
.� ! cws
� ^y � � � "/ e� y�./�
`
onmzoc ScnvIccz czmI *Epoms 5o~4z4o-ow~o� �
�
°^^-cnS
- - ------'------ |
� u /u ` -------- ----
J �«u,�� �a/��/"5 5oa.4 s cA"� F Awncxoc.. osv SUPPLIES 10_4 5 C 4-2 6 0- 2 6--
| _
| n -6/�4' /95 154.3? cu»L �r -*wpcnucm ncp^zn FARTS 1o~m4�O-�o�47 a~a^ �m36
166136 J6/C7,/85 ,op./o EARL poNDc�Scm
!
sz z~�a -------- ''
.
992.95 ° - - �'' --~ -L
)!
' ` =
0
v
i
,
,
2
2
2
1•
1
2
2
2
3
s 3
3
s
3
3
3
4
a
41
4,
s�
a
a:
s
a.
a:
19+15
Y
OF FDIN�
rurry
*!1_
)LT.-
A Mi111A1T
CHECK ISTER C6 -17- PAGE 7
II CAI nnO
168138
06/12/8°
2.51
EO PHILLIPS & SONS
CCRRECTICA
50- 3710 - 000 -CC
168138__
C6 /1Z /f5
2.51-
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
CREDIT
50- 3710- 000 -00
168138
L6/12/85
2.51-
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
CREDIT
50- 3710- 002 -00
168138
(.6 112 /F`.
81.50
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 862 -86
__-
168138
--
125.40
ED PHILLIPS & SONS
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 842 -84
204.39 •
—
— '-- - - - - --
2
168139 —_
--
'6 /'4 8 5
- --
79.50
EDINA ELECTRIC CO
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
i
a
79.50 *
-
168143
-),6/12/85
113.14-
EMRICH BAKING CO
CREDIT
27 -4624- 664 -66
168143
-.6/10/85
134. ?0
EMRICH BAKING CO
CCNCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
3
168143
;6/05/85
201.2.1
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSICNS
27- 4624- 664 -66
222. R7 +
#fr — CKS
'
168154
^6/11/E5
519.10
JCE ELIAS
WAGES
27 -4100- 663 -66
519.10 +
'
1681>6
06/10/P5
6a.50
FAIRVIEY HOSPITAL
PRO SERV
10- 4224 - 421 -42
68.57 +
168157
L6/10185
10.[10
50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN
MEETING EXFENSES
10 -4206- 520 -52
tf.ff.
fff -CKS I.
f
168161
O6/06/p5
96.33
FLYING CLOUD SANTAR
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 -4250- 353 -30
96.33 +
** *-CKS
168175
L6 /[6/85
76.38
FRITZ CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
76.38 •
` -' ----
'---
• #t -CKS
—__
_—
166188
06/05/85
19.49
GRAY9AR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR FARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
168188
C6 /C5 /f5
24.47
CRATBAR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
48.96 •
• • # # t w
168191
06/12/85
124.89
GRIGGS COOPER & CO
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
-
124.89 +
# +# -CKS ;
] 1985 CITY OF EDINA
rurrtf hr_ nArC .un11\Ir
CHECK REGISTER CE -17 -85 PAGE 8 -
-- -' ---
-
--
-
MV V Von 1 nV. i n..
a 1. .0
'1 2
'
UrNE3AL_C�IMUNI_CATNS
E9UIP MAINT
10- 301 -30
4
16o194
Jo/'�4/?5
31.70
GENERAL C ^MyUNiCATNS
CONT REPAIFS
_4226-
10- 4248- 44C -44
J�
a
a
1681 S4
•• "6 /l1' / °5
100.?^
GENERAL COMMUNiCATNS
RADIO SEFY
10- 4294- 42C -42
e
e
165194
D6/C4/85
377.50
GENERAL ClMMUNICATNS
RADIO SEFY
10- 4294- 44C-44
7
168194
n6/C4/85
266.25
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
e
`
n
794.45 *
10
It
„
+ +a -CKS
Iq
2
1082 ^6_!
u6/ 612 5
547. ^0
G 8 K SER1iICS
LA UNORT SERV
10- 4262 - 30_1 -31'
•.
A
168216
06%1'6/85
268.91
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY SERV
10- 4262- 560 -56
j4
1613206
06/C6185
191.35
G 6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY SERV
10 -4262- 646 -64
5
6821 6!..6
6/E-`_- --_
301.56
C 8 K SERVIC«
LAUNDRY SERV
40 -4262- 801 -8C
9
1 . 3C9 .12
B
17
21
7'
10
19
■. f f f •
* ** -CKS
22
24
20
168209
C6/10/E5
53.71
GENUINE PARTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
2'
6$2 ^9___-
_- ;.6/1t7L7?�_
_7. °2
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR RAFTS
10- 4540 -_ 560 -56
n
22
1682']9
16 /11'/25
139.12
GENUINE FARTS
REPAIR PAFTS
1G -4540- 560 -56
^�
'
166 2J
L6/10/85
3.14
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARATS
10- 454C- 56C -56
=°
16e2!19 06/10/E5
27.50
GENUINE FARTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
3,
25
�c
225.29 *
I
27
. ■�_ftr�.-
- -- - - --
* *+ -CKS
3.
29
166213
6/12/85
24C. "0
LEROY H LIBBY
SERVICES
40 -4200- 800 -80
3�
31
24C.00
,]
•faffa
*** -C1(S
4:
q.
J4
16o22-i
16/11/85
1, ^81.1'8
HAR NED LU4BER CO
CONSTRUCTION
10- 1422- 000 -00
35
16822C
'.6/11/85
206.51 -
VAR NED LUM8 =R CO
CREDIT
11'- 1422 - 000 -CC
"
3e
573.57 •
A7
37
38
30
*■ f f f f
* ** -CKS
_
Sn
n
40
16822F
06/11/85
101.46
HILLSTROM AUT) SUP Y
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 560 -56
-
41
168228
C6 /11/85
19006.52
HILLSTROM ALTO SUP Y
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
'4
1082.2+'•
f-..¢_/,1/F5
198:00
HILL ST90M AUTO SUP Y
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
a3
168228
06/11/85
29.54
HILLSTROP AUTO SUP Y
REPAIR PAFTS
27- 4540- 662 -66
i-7
44
49
168228
U6 /11/8'5
- _ --
12*12
347. 64 •
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
PARTS
27- 4620 - 662 -66
�a
fr
48
47
49
f f * f * •
-._.
* ** -CKS
91
e:
e3
49
168234
06/06/85
5.25
I-OCTEN CLEANERS
UNIFORM ALLOUENCE
10- 4266- 421 -42
95
ao
al
---
_.- -- - -
-- --
5.25 *
�re
97
33
*** -CKS
70
v4
1.68 -236 61?7/8�
26.44
HIRRHFTFLn -q
REPAIR PARTS
10-4546-520-52
77
`a
S8
26.44 *
-
73
74
.]
■ ■ ■f **
*af - CKS
7a
7
r
s
1985 r OF 70INA
ru' i ^K N/l_ rLTC AMnij NT
CHECK ISTER • 0E -17 'AGE 9
u - Nn na TTrm nrzrRTPTTnN ArrnllAT Nn_ TN1l_ a D_n_ a NrzcArr
168238
_ ! 6/11/8.5
30.00
WM H MGCCY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
16623E
u6 /11%95
18.']0
WM H MCCCY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
166 23F,
6/10/95
24.•70
WM H MCCOY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -45C4- 301 -30
72-.00
•fr*fa
"-
-
--
rrr.CKS
lb8244
6/10/85
215.00
FdYDF+l FURPHY
- SERVICES
10- 4226- 708 -7C
- -- -
215.00 *
168245
06/04/E5
66. '?9
ROBERT B HILL
SALT
10- 45 38- 440-44
168245
`'6/C61E5
57.00
ROBERT B HILL
CCNT SERV
27 -4200- 661 -66
123.09 *
•aar.•
*•* -CKS
16824x,
06/10/85
62.02
HARMON GLASS
CJNT REFAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
u.:6/12/85
62.D2 *
168241;
100. "^
WILLIAM MOFFMAN
POLICE SERVICE
10 -41CO- 420 -42
raft **
••• -CKS
168253
66/10/85
26.50
HUFPHREY RADIATOR
R =PAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
166253
C6 %1C /E5
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
53. ^O *
• ► f * * f
+ +• -CKS
-_ 162i271_____�Q61121E5
- -
147.49
INTER PACKAGING
CO*
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
147 .4 9 f
-
- - -- _�_.
. *•art
+ +• -CKS
166277
06 /16 1p5
52.50
CARLSON PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
52.50 *
166218
:o/14/85
58.69
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
26- 4512 - 689 -EE
le8276
06/11/85
10.00
JERRYS FOODS
CGNSTRUCTICN
26- 4624- 684 -68
168278
06%11/85
7.05
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSICNS
26- 4624- 684 -E8
76.64 *
166219
CJ6111/85
1.99
JERRYS CUR OWN
HE) WE
F =S CCNST
10- 2220- 000 -00
�^
16d275
66/11/85
7.C3
JERRYS OLR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUFFLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
168.279
06/11/85
7.03
JERRYS CUR OWN
HO WE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -3C
168279
06/11/85
7.D 3-
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
CCRRECTICN
10- 45-4- 301 -3C
1¢0219
06/11185
1.70
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
_ ___168275
06/11/F5
6.48
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUFFLIES
10- 4504 - 400 -40
168279
26/11/F5
7.2.0
JERRYS OUR OWN
HD WE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
166279
.;6/11/95
3.76
JERRYS OUD OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -454- 421 -42
16b2/9
06/11/85
5.64
JERRYS CUR OWN
HCWE
REPAIR PAFTS
10 -4504- 422 -42
166219
U6/11/t5
1.99
JERRYS OLR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440-44
168279
06/1118:
14.34
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
,1985 CITY OF EOINA CH'CK REGISTER
- 06 -17 -85 PAGE 10
rwrrr Ar_ m1 Tr AunuA1T `
__..___.__._�_,___�
11v11
.1t.U"I nu. 1nY•
x r.U. H JJ -
2
168279
v6/11/85
9.30
JERRYS
OUP. OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -45C4- 446 -44
2
_____. 166219_.._.____
J6/11/_85_____
Y 39.9.9 21-
OUa0WN_HDWE
rEV_S_U eIIfS
1�1- 450.4- 47C -47
3
°
16'+279
:6/11/85
3.98
JERRYS
CUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -45C4- 480 -4E
°
160e /9
J6/11/95
3Q.95
JTPRYS
CUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 520 -52
°
1Eo2.79
6 /11 /85
14.54
JERRYS
CUR OWN
HDWc
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 560 -56
°
166279
06%11/85
800.87
JERRYS
OUR flWN
H7WE
fEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
166279
66/11/85
15.84
JERRYS
CUR OWN
HOWE
1ST AID
10 -4510- 440 -44
Ic
3��. ?2_
r- ...J,eRpj$
�
i
C_L�O.WN_
#IDNE R &PAIR PARTS
10- 4540 -_ 64_6 -6_4
a
=
166279
L'o /11/E5
24.70
JERRYS
OUR OWN'
HOWE
PINT
_
10- 4544 - 646 -64�-
- --- - - - - --
-'
166219
''6/11/85
56.34
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
166? 79
06/-11 /E5
204.50
JERRYS
CUR OWN
HOWE
TCOLS
1C- 646 -64
e
~�
168279
J6/11/?5
25.99
JERRYS
CUR OWN
HOWE
FIRE PREY
_4580-
10- 4650 - 440 -44
1°
16o219
66/1118:
3.96
JERRYS
CUP, OWN
HO WE
INVEN SUPPLIES
23- 1209 - 000 -CO
"
166279
06/11 /q 5
12.48
JAR R Y_$ -0 U-_3_OWN
HQWE;
EGU TT `P M�IAT
27-4274_661 -6E
F
168279
1 11 /E5
17.r7 9
JERRYS
CUR DW \'
HCNE
GEN SUPPLIES
27 -4504- 661 -66
"
168279
J6/11 /85
P.06
JERRYS
OLR CAN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
27 -4504- 663 -66
22
10
188279
G6/1.1/E5
26.66
ir'RRYS
CUR OWN
He WE
PARTS
27- 4620- 662 -66
2'
`
1662/9
06/11/85
15.45
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
_5
20
166279
J6/11/85 •
7.n89/�
. JERRYS
OUR OWN
HCWE
PAINT
28- 4544 - 708 -7C
z�
z'
- �_1¢$2 :f 9..____
6/1,1/ °5._
09.0 JE�RY.SC_l'� C -'d RWE
GEN_ Q P4_IES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
:_r
2z
168279
06/11/85
11.99
JERRYS
CUP. OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PAFTS
40 -4 -4504- 863 -8C
__ _ _
23
168219
C6/11/85
2.29
JERRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
REPAIR FARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
_"
bti279 J6L11/85
3.98
JrRRYS
OUR OWN
HOWE
REPAIR FAFTS
40 4540 8C6 8C
19429.10 •
-
34
27
err.• a
CKS
-
79
o8283
1-6/11/P5
747.30
JONES CHEMICALS
INC
CHEMICALS
26- 4564- 689 -68
...,
747.30 •
e
31
33
arrrrr
rrr -CKc
a1
<
3°...._1682
E6
'!6/11 /E5
237.96
JUSTUS
LUMBER
CCNSTRUCTION
10- 1422 - 000 -00I°
97
1o62.�.6
„6/11/85
51.50
JUSTUS
LUMBER
CONSTRUCTIGN
10 -1422- 000 -OC
3e
289.46 •
47
37
30
3B
..r►rr
rrr -CKS
4�
-^
3
°O
166239
6/12/E5
100.!C0
WALTER
JOHNSON
PCLICE SERVICE
10- 4100- 420 -42
_
41
42
1()!)r ^^ a
5°
!6
43
44
..rrrr
••• -CKS
3)
�n
°S
12.776.00
VARRTS
H a VER
Co
TnSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
`
166292
06/ ^4/85
1.172. 0
HARRIS
HOMEYER
CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 560 -56
61
`7 7
139948.00 *
52
5°
r r • -CKS
-
rc
52
1.512.35
TRTARCO
ARTS ---&
CRAFT
GEN SUPPL 1ES
10 4504 624 -62
67
1•,
q7
19512.35 *
�_ - �� - -'
-
)O
54
53
rrr rt r
•
rrr-CKS
]1
7z
73
78
168300
06110/85
125.00
KOKESH
ATHLETIC
BASEBALL EQUIP
10- 4582 - 621-82
7
r
r
w
.y
s
y
b
19s 5 Y OF rO IN.+
CHrCK tv CATE
�I
z
CHECI ISTER C6 -17- FACE 11
t
OMnIIR1T UCRinCJ TTCU rCCr0Tn7TAU .rrnllfT ILIA_ Tau_ M o_n_ f u c Rrf ..-
168300
x6/10/85
1v9f6.OD
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SOCCER EQUIP
10- 4598- 627 -62
16a 3Q(3
Lb /1C /ES
272.55
K!7KESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPPLIES
2_6- 4504 - 687_ -68
__.
1683U1)i
",6/10%85
102.64
KOKESH ATHLETIC
CLOTH P.EFLAC
26- 4574- 687 -68
_-
2a476.19
•rraar
aaa -CKS
__. 1611312
_ 06/11/85
_5793.71_
KUETHER GIST CO
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
1683 ^2
01121
794P1.66
KUETHER GIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
139275.37 a
f R f R a R
16 3.4
16/11/85_
18.98
KNOX LUMBER CC
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
1683 4
6 /1L' /E5
_
_ 101.?5
KNCX LUMB =R CO
REPAIR P A F I S
10- 4540- 520 -5i
�-
1o83v4
''6/10/F5
35.09,
KNOX LUMB E R CC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
16831'4
- 6/12/85
66.35
KNCX LUMR --- P. C0
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
1633U4
061121F5
47.53
K40X LUMBER C3
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
168'('4
06/12/85
16.18
KNCX LUMB,, =R CC
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
_16N3C4
L6 /C6 1E5
53.70
KNOX LUMBER CC
LUMBER
10- 646 -64
1oa3t =4
6 /ii 6185
62.25
KNOX LUMB =R CO
LUMBER
_4604-
10- 4604 - 646 -64
1683U4
U6 /O4 /E5
5G.76
KNOX LUMB - R CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
1683L4
05/04/85
75.75
KNCX LUMPr-R CO
REPAIR FAFTS
27- 4540- 66_2 -66
1683G4
C6 /C6/85
11.79
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 708 -7C
165364
C6/C5/85
15.10
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -7C
_168304
n6/r4/E.5
6.34
KNOX LUMB =R CO
REPAIR PARTS
30 -4540- 802 -80
570.56 +
- - -- - --
RffRa•
+•• -CKS
168311
C'6/11111
4 n24.10
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
`168311:16
/12 /8 !
5,a73.55
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50 -46.0- 842 -84
168311
6111/85
9 4C4.?0
EASTSIDE P_EVEP.AGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -E6
199302.35 +
• +.rra
ar• -CKS
166317
06/ ^7185
188.45
LAWSON PRODUCTS
CEN SUPPLIES
10- - 322 -30
160-317
J6 /-7 /E:
27.63
LAWSON PRGDUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
_4504
10- 4504 - 646 -64
1611317
^6/[7/85
102.72
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4542 - 325 -3G
166317
6/n7/P5
348.31
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
166317
06/^_7185
168.87
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4620-560-56
_
835.Q8
168315
[6/11185
111.75
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 440 -44
166318
Uo/11185
12.00
LEFF BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504- 611 -61
16831E
C6/11/85
19. 110
L°_EF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
i7- 4262 - 662-66
141.75
5:555.
- - - -- ---
--- - - -.--
a r • -CKS
168325
16/lC/85
180. 10
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
_
180 '0 •
ra►rra
•�r -CKS
°v�: czr,
OF
c*ccx
xcasrEn
0*-17-8 5 FA C E 12
:*cc*
|
ccc _---__----'u'
INV.
_*_p,o. -*.nccevo�___
��L
| 1*uar
c*/r/p�
zu�.�o
/-x*�_�7x/`-cuuIp.-----'-
REPAIR _FA
0_��^?- ��o- 5ei
i
^^^rcxs -
' ,')9341
ro 7 /v5
*4.61
M m z INC) aunpu
sEw uuppLzso
10~4504~560-56
44 .m
.
^^^-cxc
i-/
/ 1 8 34 4
wiz/F 5
17.3*
o70 nxvmcv m Euuzp
cou/v pAz^Y
10 ~4 2 7 4-449~*4
�
| 108344
Su/12/v5
17 .c5
pco nxvsc,4 u smuIp
vxr Azo
19~4510~**0~44
_34.41
^^^-cxs
�.
� -
! !
- ----------'--'---
v, .rs
---'------
��r w wxorc c �
mm
aon pcn�o
,o~ovs~168346 000-c
__--_-- -__ -' '__!�
� .
/
10 951 s.75
^
_
-C KS
--1 c3 5.1 _--�/'-4
!
''^'"
~
['
|
| lo835 3
'o/n/�r
Mz*mErmv oLax- '
o"m muppcIso
10-4574-301-32
_ 168�53
5
:f%N SOT! G
.
�1 S-UPPLTE
16u353
-u/lo /m
s».ao
pzwmTsor^ amvc
ocw uuppLxco
4c~450+801~80
—'--'
171 .20
|
�uu3 5 4
o/12/ 5
61. 72
xTNmcxnaLzn ;AS
co
*cAr
1c~4254~446~44
|
wn-)54
`6/12/s5
,
»3 'o
p�xmc�"nu� s»�
co
*c�r
- -
�o �z,� �oO-�D
_ _168 3 5 4
_--vma/ 5 �
�«
�r4 2 5 4_52 0_
�
mx/»+
cur,»/ E 5
1m.24
pr NNE xpoLzz sxs
co
wc^r
10-4254-540~54
- -
' 1ex354
cunz/o�
lo :0
yImwE Apnus suo
cu
ucxr
,o~4 2m~6 29~6 2
�
166354
-6/1 i/�- 5
'_--_-1-21^? 3___-_--p1
^mcupoL1 s 5 t
co --- ___��^r
,u8 J:) 4
r6/1 2/�5
6. 33
p'xncucn/7s n^S
CO
____10~4254~6.46-e4
*cA/
2r~11 30~OcO~oc
'
166354
/1 2/o5
»1.^2
p1mmEx=zL/s o'n
CO
*cAr
2 3-4a5 4~611~61
|� �
16u�45+
�6 /`2/e5
EAT
2Ir4 2 5 4-a6 2- 6 6___
[
,v8354
c6 / 1z/«5
3.Po
mzmwcopoLIs n^a
co
xrx7
28~425*~708~70
--------------'--/ /
l"635*
z6v12/95
85.n*
pzxnE^noL-s oxa
ce
wsx7
40~*2 54~801~8 o
/
�
168354
6/12/e5 '-_
'-_--__-35 5 .j 4Mzwm,E^EVL
'$-(jAsuV'----._-*cxr4
2s*-on3_8o
|
| 166354
�6/1z/u,
3.710
p7nwcunoLzS GAS.
CC
*s^1
53 ~42 5 4~8 31~9 2
/ | Iuo54
'-o/1x/o5
16.'*
pTmwcupoLIs sux
co
* --- ^r
50~42 5 4~841~8 4
.
_ l^u354
z+/104s__--
1,nol.3r
^
����
'------ - --
-
' ^^^^°°
-
—'---------'-------------------------____-_--'__-_--____--___-____-_-_---
----'
-- ^^^-ms 1
'1 mrns
�wa�az
232.+5
nM uLIpw SERVICE
ALARM acno
27~43 0 4-66 0~6 6
--
-
�
-
'
| 16 6 3 5"
*n1/8 5
111.96
MINN `nmo zmc
ecpAT" p*Frs
27~4540-*62-66
l'
r
r
v
r
r
r
r
r
r
e
19P5 Y OF �OIKA
rurrr *n- n.1 TC .YnIuT
CHECK ISTER C6 -17- PAGE 13
----- - -
- - --
--
111.96 •
- --
.. � v u n . �• L n ..
r. v. N 1'I L J J P V C
i
168361
C6/C7/85
31.07
MTNNE$OTA WANNER
CCNT REFAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
168360;
'J6/ ^5/E5
1,625._0
MINNESOTA WANN =R
CCNT REPAIFS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
16o36?
o /'7 /85
6.21
MINNESOTA WANNER
GEN SUfFLIES
10 -4504- 328 -30
16836['
C6/'.7/E5
1Q.25
MINNESOTA WANNER
CCNT REPAIRS
10 -4504- 646 -64
168360
C6 /CA /85
116.!g0
MINNESOTA WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
40 -454C- 811 -80
1.798.26
+ * * * **
z
+ ++ -CKS
r
' 168362
`?6/10/85
121.7 C
r
MOCEL STOUc _ CMPANY
GEN e UFFLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
" 168362
„6/10/85
309. °'6
MODEL STCN= COMPANY
CONCRETE
10 -4528- 301 -30
'_ —__ -- 1x8362_._
_ =6/1..185109.79
MODEL STON- COMPANY
CASTINGS
10 -4552- 345 -30
B 166362
v,6/1C/85
1.596.97
MnCEL STCN= COMPANY
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 803 -80
B
29137.52
3 *** * **
* ** -CKS
—_ 1 36
1_6 „/1_2/85
10�.00
BERT MERF_L0
POLICE SERVICE
10 -4100- 420 -42
:
10n�nn t
—
168__66
Q6 /11 /E`5
324..35
MINNESOTA PAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 822 -82
' 168366
06/12/85
574.76
PINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632 -8 842 -E4
' 168366
36/11/85
593.21
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
1 492 .32 +
* ** -CKS
168370
06/11/85
16.40
MTDLAND PRODUCTS CO
CEN SUPPLIES
26 -4 C4- 84 -68
168370
06/10/85
273.70
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
CONCESSICAS
26- 4624- 684 -68
290 .10 *
— - -- - - - -
-- - - -.._— _
_
166371
06/C7/?5
254.80
MILHOFF STEEL
CON7 REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
254.80 *
** * * **
_-
***-CKS
1083,79
66/12/85
109147.60
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822 -82
16637?'
U6/12/85
109147.80
MARK V11 SOLES INC
iNVENTCRY
50 -4630- 822 -82
_1663/8
;6/12/85
109147.80-
MARK VII SALES INC
CORR -CTICK
50 4630 822
1663/8
06%12/85
129570.70
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
-82
50 -4630- 842 -84
168378
- -- - - -- - —
L16/11/8`.
- -_ —_ - - - --
129835.05
35,553.35
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
r
168379
06/24/85
35.40
METRO FONE COMM
EQUIP FENTAL
10- 4226- 301 -3C
_
35.40 *
1¢8380
06/12/85
99667.70
THOMSEN NYBECK
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 220 -22
- - - - - - -- . _ — ... —__
9.667.00 *
1663 81
G6/C4185
120.70'
STAR 8 TRIBUNE
ACVERTISING
10- 4212 - 600 -60
166381
06/04/85
30.[•1
STAR S TRIBUNE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4564 - 600 -6G
,
1683 F1
'j6/C4/85
266.25
STAR & TRIBUNE
ACVERTISING
23- 4214 - 610 -61
7
416.25 +
77
7
19'5 CITY OF 'O!N-
CHECK IN':. - C =TE_. _
I
ICI
CHECK RE(i!STCP. CE -17 -85 PACE 14
QUNT V �IA.9_' ITEM DESCPjP?ICA A�COUAT K0.- TAV...__p_P.O. p MESSAO= _.____
+ *+.•CKS
1f:03 °3 _6/r6/°_ 25. 0 MRLS C)MC TREKS WATER
I
I '
I'
_ _1683Y1
1663 °5
6/1Z/85
1083=5
;_b /12/t5
"i 1633G1 =
= 6/12155
1683 ^5
--6/12/F5
I
I '
I'
_ _1683Y1
i 166'' -91 X
X6/12/85
I
166391 _
_6/12/85
"i 1633G1 =
= 6/12155
1f ?391 9
9/12/E5
16'3Q1 6
6/12[/?5
16b391 C
C6 /12/85___!_
160391 1
1:6/12/ ?5
1t83o1 C
C6/12/F5
166 39 1 6
6/12/F5
_6/12/115
150391 _
_6112/Fi
_ _188391_ 1
16/12/
I,_I 1
166391 U
U6/12/ ?5
166301 -
-6/12/85
168'391 7
76/12/85
I_" 1
1633.1 X
X6/12/55
___..
.16o391
li
16c3'�6
1oE396
_I I 1 6 396
168346
41-4258- 801 -2:
•• - -CKS
yCGUIRE =)BERT C)RRECTICA 1U -4242- 353 -37
1 °,0.''_ MC GUIP.E POECeT IASFECTICA 10- 4242 - 353 -30
lP ^0 hCGU'R° 'OB17RT TRE -_ - _ __ 10- - -30
720. =0 NC GUI RI ?OtlERT TREE 1NSfECTICN J EO- 1300 - 015 -18
onn -.n .
I�.
+++.CKS
273.x1_ N.S.' . CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 -_ 301 -37
12.207.31 N. S.;) CCYPANY ✓LECTRIC 10- 4252 - 321 -30 - -- - - - - -
9.174.32 N.S. ?. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 322 -30
1.,73 ?.43 ._-- -- N.S.P._ CO -'PAN - - _ -_ _ -- __;LE CTRIC_- _- ,._ -__-- _10-4252- 33C -3C - - -- :
206.34 N.S.o. CCMPANv _LECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30
9 -.54 k.S.P. CCMDANY = LECTRIC 17 -4252- 358 -30
1,6On._8 N.S.P _COMPANY _ ELECTRIC 1C- 4252- 375 -30
226.77 A.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 44C -44
39.63 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -4E
344 .1 3 A.S.P._COM�AhY.-- -- .---- . - -__- ELECTRIC_____- -- .---- - -._10- 4252 - 570 -50.
2.275.62 N.S. -- . C.C,4PA^JY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 520 -52
05 7.34 A.S.P. C01 ?AVY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 54C -54
561.29 N.S.P. Cc MPPNY __ E_LECTRIC ;_ 10 -4252- 629 -62
11.34 K.S. ?. COMPANY !-EAT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 "I
2,357.85 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 646 -64
13.° 34.S.P_..._C14P.ANY.�._ -_ -- -- =LECTRIC,------ -. -_ -- - -- __,2?- 1130 - 000- Cu._ --
32Q.56 A.S.P. COMPANY = L- ECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61
1Q.)? N.S.P. COM °ANY HEAT 26 -4252- 689 -6E
_ 24.54 K - S.P. COMP AN. K , LECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68
1,6lo _ c A.S.P. CCMPANY CONSTRUCTION -- - 27 -13CC- GOO -03 - - -- - -
90°. ?4 K.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66
86.79 A'.c- ?.COklOANY- _CTRIC,_ 27- 4252 - 662 -6E
- 2,226.86 �� -- A.S.P. CO`iPA,)Y ELECTRIC----- - - -- 28- 4252 - 708 -7C
166.16 N.S.P. CO MPA�IY ELECTRIC 29- 4252- 721 -72 �.
___337.73 N.Q.P. COMPANY _LECTRIC 40- 4242- _8C4 -EC
29071.55 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252- 801 -80
17,945.41 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 803 -E0
_582,7_5._ _ .N,h - .- CC109ANY,._. :LECTRIC 50 -4252- 821 -82.
1.C33.67 A.S.P. COMPA:'JY C.LECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -E4
426.97 K.S.P. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 861 -86
- 59,74973 +
+++ -CKS
+= 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ --
6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON=
:6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N
06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE
06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE
10- 4226 -160 -1E
10- 4256- 46C -46
_10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _
10- 4256- 51C -51
10- 4256 - 622 -E2
I�.
+++.CKS
273.x1_ N.S.' . CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 -_ 301 -37
12.207.31 N. S.;) CCYPANY ✓LECTRIC 10- 4252 - 321 -30 - -- - - - - -
9.174.32 N.S. ?. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 322 -30
1.,73 ?.43 ._-- -- N.S.P._ CO -'PAN - - _ -_ _ -- __;LE CTRIC_- _- ,._ -__-- _10-4252- 33C -3C - - -- :
206.34 N.S.o. CCMPANv _LECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30
9 -.54 k.S.P. CCMDANY = LECTRIC 17 -4252- 358 -30
1,6On._8 N.S.P _COMPANY _ ELECTRIC 1C- 4252- 375 -30
226.77 A.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 44C -44
39.63 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -4E
344 .1 3 A.S.P._COM�AhY.-- -- .---- . - -__- ELECTRIC_____- -- .---- - -._10- 4252 - 570 -50.
2.275.62 N.S. -- . C.C,4PA^JY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 520 -52
05 7.34 A.S.P. C01 ?AVY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 54C -54
561.29 N.S.P. Cc MPPNY __ E_LECTRIC ;_ 10 -4252- 629 -62
11.34 K.S. ?. COMPANY !-EAT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 "I
2,357.85 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 646 -64
13.° 34.S.P_..._C14P.ANY.�._ -_ -- -- =LECTRIC,------ -. -_ -- - -- __,2?- 1130 - 000- Cu._ --
32Q.56 A.S.P. COMPANY = L- ECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61
1Q.)? N.S.P. COM °ANY HEAT 26 -4252- 689 -6E
_ 24.54 K - S.P. COMP AN. K , LECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68
1,6lo _ c A.S.P. CCMPANY CONSTRUCTION -- - 27 -13CC- GOO -03 - - -- - -
90°. ?4 K.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66
86.79 A'.c- ?.COklOANY- _CTRIC,_ 27- 4252 - 662 -6E
- 2,226.86 �� -- A.S.P. CO`iPA,)Y ELECTRIC----- - - -- 28- 4252 - 708 -7C
166.16 N.S.P. CO MPA�IY ELECTRIC 29- 4252- 721 -72 �.
___337.73 N.Q.P. COMPANY _LECTRIC 40- 4242- _8C4 -EC
29071.55 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252- 801 -80
17,945.41 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 803 -E0
_582,7_5._ _ .N,h - .- CC109ANY,._. :LECTRIC 50 -4252- 821 -82.
1.C33.67 A.S.P. COMPA:'JY C.LECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -E4
426.97 K.S.P. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 861 -86
- 59,74973 +
+++ -CKS
+= 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ --
6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON=
:6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N
06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE
06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE
10- 4226 -160 -1E
10- 4256- 46C -46
_10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _
10- 4256- 51C -51
10- 4256 - 622 -E2
+= 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ --
6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON=
:6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N
06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE
06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE
10- 4226 -160 -1E
10- 4256- 46C -46
_10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _
10- 4256- 51C -51
10- 4256 - 622 -E2
10- 4226 -160 -1E
10- 4256- 46C -46
_10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _
10- 4256- 51C -51
10- 4256 - 622 -E2
I
r
r
r
r
r
r
r
V
r
r
1965 OF r-DINA CHECK ISTER 06 -17 -1 'AGE 15
rHFrK Nr_ fIATF 8MMI1NT urRnnp TTru rrzrGTOTTn AI IlrrmfKT IJA- T6111_ h O -/+.- A mrccArr
E
1o8396
06/12/85
19.45
NCRTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
10- 42'.6 - 646 -64
,166;96
_ --
06/12/85
132.33
NORTHVESTERN__8ELL
PHONE
23 -4256- 611 -61
1663°6
C6/12/Q5
53.38
NORTHWESTERN EELL
PHONE
26- 4256- 689 -6E
16d3ot
u6/12/8S
335.71
Nf7FTHWEST: -RN EcLL
PHONE
27 -4256- 661 -66
168396 __
06/12/8_5
288.40
DCRTNWEST,- RN 8ELL
PHONE
28 -4256- 708 -70
166396
06/12/85
46.98
NOFTHWEST =RN BELL
PHONE
29- 4256- 721 -72
168396
06/12/85
7 ^05
NORTHWESTERN EELL
PHONE
40 -4256- 801 -EO
168396 _ _ _
_ 06/12/85
210.30 _
NORTH_WE_STERN BELL
PHONE
40- 4256 -- 803 -80
166396
06 /12 /AS
137.42
Af,RTWW- ESTcRA TELL
PHONE
50 -4256- 821 -82
168306
C6/12/85
179.43
NORTHWESTERN HELL
TELEPHONE
50- 4256- 841 -84
L_168396
- _
06/_12/85
13 ^.92
NORTHWESTERN EELL
TELEPHCNE
50- 4256- 861 -P6
5,914.01 r
--
r. r r •
- --
- -- --
- - ---
rrr -CKS
1664`:['
'6/11/85
2.470.14
NOPTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUEES
10- 4616- 560 -56
2.470.14 •
rrrrrr
�10.10-
rrr -CKS
1b 8a ^ -6
u6/75185
NTCC NW R_,ION
CREDIT
10- 4540- 520 -52
1o64C,6
161 ^5/85
203.94
NTCC NW F=4IDN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
1o84r6
r6/'5/85
39.53
NTCC NW F - -GION
REPAIR RAFTS
50 -4540- 321 -82
1684C16
C?6 /C5 /a5
54.7E
NTCC NW FEGICN
REPAIR PARTS
50 -4540- 821 -82
288.15
168413
^_6/r5/85
381.64
NATIONWIEF PAPERS
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504- 663 -66
3EI.64 •
rrrra.
166420
:6/10/85
181.05
CLD DUTICH FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
1 F1 .0 5 •
166421
C6/C5/85
134.95
OLSnN CHAIN & CABLE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 643 -64
166411 _
1_6/10/85
69.50
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
204.45 •
- -- - - ---'-
rrrrrr
rrr -CKS
16b429
GW6 1E5
1,345.90
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
CCNCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
16642906/11/85
218.75
PE "FSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632 -822 -82
168419
'6 /12 /E`.
357.25
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- _ 842 -84
168429
^.6/11,/85
414.05
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
2.375.95 •
.trrrr
- - -� -�
rrr -CKS {,
168433
C6 /12 /E5
103.68
FAUSTIC 9 SONS
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
1bR433
r6 /12 /E5
43.92
PAUSTIG & SONS
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
168433
0.6/12/85
65.06
FAUSTIC R SONS
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
166433
t)6/12/85
65.88
CAUSTIC & SONS
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
279.36 •
19F oT, m, rnz�`
c*Ecv n".. coc
°vu4 -5+
16a^41
'^e4w
1,)6 443
'ox^��
|�
,ox4 5.
' |
1684 6u
|'| 1684 en
1664 6L,
H
| —
|.
_(
lob 4. 62
' mt4e,�
^ ,*x4+�
'-|
! ^^^^^^
' —
1om4u/
(] 1or- r
|
|
../
� 1ue4/�
[]
l+u4v2
o/'5/o5
cx,-cw PEG! s/Ee c+~1r~u5 puCs 16
-10 Js x,_x_p,o. t pcssusF
n6.va Ph' 'rM -Scxvzcc zNc _ uu�����,7 z0_f2 �4_70� 7C
»6,n» ° -
"=
'-'
�m12/x» ___-'--_a' 7 -RAG C' CO
zxn^"n an,^L nEv`nA,;:" co
»or.5o °
:6/12/�5
~*/r6 /u5
a5.
2 5.`c °
i
^^^-cwx '
_--/*»Ew TOR r--'_-__ ---_- 50~**M~84 2~n*_-
IxxcwronY 5o~46 30~8e2-8 +
/
°^^-cxs '
a'.no oIrsLLzTc znnumnIco ccwr ncxx
---------'---��^-cxs _[�
||
27~*290-662-e6 '
-�'---�'--
--
-----------�
--------_-_-_-_.-_
' ~~^-`_ r
,�^/c+/�F 5
3 5 .6,0
THE pRzwr oonp
pxouxxrs
10~42co~500~50
(.
/vx
T"cp�rwr spop'
_paINlI0n
10.*6CV-628-t2
.�
zzz.m °
-
__ _ _____
_
_- ----_
.._^^^-ml-�1'
�6/c4/uj
138 .Qu
puwwEp mpe co
cxnxAxmo
10~4200~500-50
-
�a.,n_ ' �_po"nc�'wrscn
� ------------� -
9.36
poc
p*n/u
10~4620-560-56
9.36°--
`
r6 /l I/?s
lRn.;o
ROYAL onoww ncx
(?^4632-822-E2------'--
-- ---- - --
C6/12 /?5
312 .2C'
xnvAL cx04m e--x
zwcmonv
50~46 32~842-8 4
0/11 /.95
362.30 --
xnvuL cnn�m_o�x__--__-
zv«ENIORY
�n-��������«�
n5r,""
--
'
'
�61 6/n5
45z.0 0
ncmruL cuuzp &
oxLcs
cav cuppocx
10-45o*-353-3o
c6/1C/b5
10x.qo _-___nswruL_EGuzp_v
SALES
Jcos
vc~*58C-353-30
1153.70
RENTAL couIp o
sucs
-------10
mnLs
~ ^5oo ~ y53~ 3c----
|�
-* o
/�/t�
120 .I?
xcwr«L souzp m
sxLcs
5 cnv1cco
4 042 2*80 5E0
'- ---__-----_-___«
cm
117 IF
-_-__-_-_-'_-_--__--_-__---__-
a
35. �
wIcxp!cLc =Lopp
o co
_.--_----___--
cCmT REPAIRS -
--- �������~�bz��� -
-
.
356.-0 °
/
�m12/x» ___-'--_a' 7 -RAG C' CO
zxn^"n an,^L nEv`nA,;:" co
»or.5o °
:6/12/�5
~*/r6 /u5
a5.
2 5.`c °
i
^^^-cwx '
_--/*»Ew TOR r--'_-__ ---_- 50~**M~84 2~n*_-
IxxcwronY 5o~46 30~8e2-8 +
/
°^^-cxs '
a'.no oIrsLLzTc znnumnIco ccwr ncxx
---------'---��^-cxs _[�
||
27~*290-662-e6 '
19F5 OF EDI1 A
rurr. nfn- fiLTr .unll ilr
CHECK ISTER . 06 -17 'ACE 17
VENDOR ITEM DESCFIFTICA ACCOUNT NO* INV N P 0 N MESSAGE
60.n0 r
frk ►if
CKS
166485
2138.62
STATE BLDG IN SF
BLDG PERMITS
10 -3095- 000 -CO
168485
E6/f]4/85
101. 170
STATE BLCG INSP
SUR CHARGE TAN
10- 3113 - 000 -CO
2,839.62
rrrrrf
rrr -CKS
16649' --
- -
^= 6/10_/85
-
111.60
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
10- 4544 - 335 -3C
' rrr r i
111.60
*
e,
-
•
168492
06/11/8`.
3.53
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPATR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
164492
6/11/85
26.72
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARIS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
168492
G6 /11/x5
108.51
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1f-8492
06/11/E5
19.52
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
66492._`...
-- 06/11_/85
_ -4_.26
S CUT HDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 5_60 -56
166492
Jo /11/E`
2.13
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
168492
'26/11/85
38.49
SGUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PAPTS
10- 454C- 56C -56
168492
06/11/"_
42.36
SOUTHDALE FORD
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
245.52
-- 166493
- 06/11 /85 -
3,733.90
SCUTHSIDE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50- 4630_- 822 -82
168493
6/12%85
6,381).50
SJUTHSIOE DIST COI °IC
iWVENTORY
5!'- 4620- 842 -84
--- - - - - --
168493
'6/11/°5
596.20
SOUTWSTOE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
10,705.60
r
trrrrr
-
rrr -CKS
1oP_S c
.0/11 /E5
237.61
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CCNT REPAIFS
10- 4248 -5 560 -56
-
168502
= 6/11/65
12.5r
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
R EPAIR PAPTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
166502
^._6/11/8`
18.79
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PAFTS
1C -4540- 560 -56
158502
06/11/85
11.36
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
1685f2
^6/11/E5
11.47
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PAF1S
10- 4540- 560 -56
201.73
:
16853
^,6/05/85
14.34
SUBURBAN 'LUMB SUP
REPAIR PAFTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
-_ 164503
6/r5 /85
169.75
SU9URRAN PLUMP_ SUP
REPAIR PARTS
1C -4540- 520 -52
16656
C W,5/25
80.30
SUPURBAN PLUMP SUP
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540- 54C -54
j
16E5 3
C6/C5/85
16.50
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PAFTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
_1695 ^3- _____.,_g6/C5185
-
77.22
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PAFTS
30- 4540- 801 -80
I,
1685n3
C6/ ^5/85
34.49
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PAPTS
30- 4540- 802 -80
-
392.60
r
••f rf f
- - -- - "-
rrr -CKS
85 g-5
_ ^6
2500
SUN
DUES
10= 4204 -_ 600 -60
1o85C5
Q5�04/i5
10.99
SUA
ADVERTISING
1,7- 4210- 14C -14
- --
168505
Co /C4125
20.42
SUN
ACVERTISING
10- 4210- 140 -14
1o85(115
Cb/12/85
11.81
SUA
ADVERTISIEG
10- 4210- 140 -14
68.22
r
rrrrrr
I
rtr_CKS .1?
"F5 CITY
CF
CHECK REGTST_R
CE -17 -85
P A GE 18
C HE CK N'.
DT=
P MOUqT
—_v
O;ErSCF1ET_j_q_N_
ACCOUNT
ST PAUL -ECOK
G:'N-sueRL 11
10- 4 5 0 4- 4 2 0- 4 2
h 5_6
h/1 -4 55
7.2C'-
Sr ?9 UL 8 ) CK
C PE r. I T
10-45C4-510-551
I - 5`
.6/11L "5
1 1 4
ST PVJL. R,' 1 K
OFFICE SLFPLIES
10-4516-140-14
15051,°
;'6 1 ^/ }5
.79
ST PAUL-C-10K
LFFIC-- SUPPLIES
10-4516-160-16
ST PAUL E^OK
OFFICE SLFFL',ES
1�'-4516-510-51
10 N5 3
b / ^4/E5
96.43
ST PAUL 8 Q' F?K
CFF ICE S LPPL I E S
10-45 16-510- 51
CK S
100 51'
5
66 ^.;`0
FATT BULLOCK COST
RENTAL
10-4200 -642-64
6 6 C 0
.0/11 /C5
25.05
S7LTIE4.14 u1CUU'1 SFRV
SERVICES
50-4236-861-E6
25.05
lb 9 51 e
'-o /10 5
14 . PO
s 3068
1C -4504- 646 -E4
GEN SUPPLIES
14.,qO
C K
1 -16.40
G5N SUFFLIE-S
10-45C4-54C-54
I r1l 6.4 ^
— ----------
C K S
d
15±522
1
21t 5
91F?5.09
STANDARD .)IL
GASOLINE
13- 4612 - 560 -56
-
2
b /12 /F5
9
STANDADD--r'IL
GASOLINE
10-4612-560-56
63,6 R 7
*■• -CKS
IS 52 6
'_b /CS /r5
1 20.''0
TRACY OIL CO
GAS CLI N-7
10-4612-560-5t
R20.'�O
40*-CKS
15052°
o/ -6 /8 5
46.54
TWIN CITY ELZVATJR
CONT SERY
1'3-42CO-52C-52
46.54
CKS
116511
-,6111/11
31 Q.'0
16,537
0t) /1?4 / E 5
474.)0
TRT STATE DRILLING
CCNT REPAIRS
40-4248-801-8C
6 5 3 1
6/74 /8 5
— 474
_ DRILLING NGL—
4 0-4540-302-2e)
32
TAI S'AT!: DRILLING
REPAIR PAF7S
4,-4540-805-30
1 75- .--0
17
47.31
1; 7!J S U P P L S
27- 4504- b61 -66
19.5 1 OF 70 IN+
r Wrry Af_ nLTF AuNIUT
CHECK ISTER
VC Un no I ro Tn T Tn.�
C6 -17- 'AGE 19
47.33 *
16N542
= A /11 /95
119499.98
THORPE GIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
--
119499.98 *
... :..
++•-CKS
160551
�6/C61P.5 - - ^
-- 473.30
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOW
10- 4266 - 420 -42
10�i51
j6 / "6 /95
379.63
UNTFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLCW
10 -4266- 421 -42
1o85i1
C6/76/P5
44.110
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10- 4266- 422 -42
z 1085 1
r6/ ',16/o5
155.28-
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
CJRRECTICA
10 -4266- 422 -42
168551
U6 /C6 /E5
155.28
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOW
10- 4266 - 422 -42
1o8551
06/ ^.6 /P5
155.28
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALL06
10- 4266 - 460 -46
191752.21
f f f i k f
* +• -CKS
1o8553
C6/'?4/85
19696.97
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 322 -3C
168553
^6 /C5 /85
195.13
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 322 -30
108553
_- _C6 /r5 /85
42.79
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
168 53
^6/' -5185
467.75
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
P.EPAIR FARTS
10 -454C- 520 -52
' 'otti553
t_W5 /P5
25.94
UNITED ELECTRIC CGRF
REPAIR P A F I S
10- 4540- 52C -52
168553
r6IC518 5
3806
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR FARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
?68553
C6/05/85
291.24
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
168553
U6/ ^5/85
78.23
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
1oR553
'16 /C5 /p5
4 ^-.61
UNITED ELECTRIC COPP
REPAIR FARTS
10 -4540- 646 -64
?08553
^- 6 /C5 /si
.114.05
UNIT O ELECTRIC COPP
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 661 -66
108553
^61'5/85
45.39
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR FARTS
27- 4540 - 661 -66
1o6553
553
uo/ 5/85
501.35
UNIT =D ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540_- 708 -70
1o8
C6 /C5 /E5
49.31
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR FARTS
50 -4540- 861 -86
3.585.42 * .
16o5o_6_
- u6/11/85
493.00
VICEO iM4GES
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -CC
* *+ -CKS
1o85o6
06/C7 E5
133. ?0
%IDEO IMAGES
CABLE TV
10- 2149- 000 -00
626.20 *
• f f f t .
-- - + +�- CKS..-
158569
- -
06/C6/85
133.52
VALLEY IND PROPANE
GASCLINE
28 -4612- 707 -70
130.52 *
... -CKS
--
-- ---- _
166512
06/12/85
99.60
VAN PAPER CO
GEN SUPP
10 -45C4- 52C -52
168572
06/l2/E5
53?.25
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUFF
10- 4514 - 520 -52
637.85 *
-
- -- ......- ..
- - -- -
* ** -CKS
-
1605!3
L6 /10/65
19E10.46
WM.H.2IEGLER C, INC
CUNT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
_
1 9810.46 +
168579
06/10/E5
31 .63
WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 45C4 - 301 -30
1 rzTv
OF N.
75.95
rzoucsr eooc
c*ccx ncaorce
23~3265~000~00
|
nt- 17~85 pms 23 �
c"ccx �r.
s�`c _
x�cu
��_-_-_-_r�c
cc0}�I_H�,_J�x^_o���~.-*-��c��«�
/.
| 1,53 5 7v
rm`n/n5
54.c2
w/LLz^ps urEcL.eou~
csu nuppucs
110~4504~52c-52
!' =
1 ^u5/"
E
!��.��
—
-----'
�z���vwn_�r���,wo��
-----
Jcn�
1����yO-�����o-'
ze.zo
^
-'-
`.
[
�
`]
cxs_|�|
15m5 ^/
an1 /x5
502 .67
t8 7-
GORDON oM:r* c-)
nuanLIwc
27~4 6 12-662~6 6
wrpx srLo
I^ar2
.w"4 1 e5
631 .95
�poYwzrx o- _ '
—o
cL;NE7~4alZ-6o2_u+
,1»4.^2
_^^^-cws
i `oatpao
cu `5n5
38.93
w w onx IN" ca
pspAzn pAxn
10~*540~520~52
|� lbu5n
`,/e5/v5
46 .90
'__---u
6 sp^mGcn
REP ^z§�-F ;pro
1o~4s^ Cl- 5zn~5z__-
/ ' =
u , �
' '
r �
. �
_
6 � vn�/m�sn
qspozR p»Fm
IC~454O~520~52
'u.5 /S5
4."4
w s*^rmr�cn
RcpAzR p^Frc
10-454c~540-54
'
, *156 5
�,/.�/»�_-_-_
�1���
NIEx __R�
-__.
413.02
^
_
/
°°^-cx 3 .�
/l
-' u5," ]
�//z
,o - o
cNR, uacacxx'
poLzcc ssxzcE
m w[C 42n *2
[
| 1�u�y�
/w�z/�^
'
ov.oi
cccsL/A uyIn+
wzLcec
10~*2u6~1*0~14
|
»"^`��-
-- '- ------ ---
— ---------- -----
----_ --
_
� 116ez
r4/�5
---'o4.4o
p1r c�*rnAL pzas
ocw ouppLzcn '
o~4sc4-*v~44
� --_n«592.'
�'*�4/us-_-_--__--_'-l2�^"
�u_�/���l�s
g-450*-44s-44__-_'--
|
1mo�
»z.r
-
wzn cswrnu� rzp�
cuom�no ;Epmcc
�c~w
' |
,
|
-------------'-----'_--__-_--_--___-'
17. 30
PzxwEE-SnrA CLAY
_ -__-
zNxcwronv cuppL/cs
�_- --_
23~12n9-000-oO
|
| 1= 6 5v 3
`"/14
44.50~
xIwvcsnrx cLx,
c"s01r
2 3-4 5 8x~61«-6,
lC-�-_--_
�-!
. | `om`4
cur4,E 5
3 .604.16
a/onc rncwr
xcmwTccs
10~*e4-50 4~5c
'
�
604.16 _�________
-
---'---'-------
. 1686 ,
�
'6/'5/F5
75.95
rzoucsr eooc
oowxrzowo
23~3265~000~00
|
75.95 ^
/|
..,`" ~
�uuIc`
_-14.
v�s�a�I���9wCRx__S
CL J��s��6-25~000-oo_
`]
z",u
----
t8 7-
'01' 5/,5
zv
p^x oruzsLr-/
wrpx srLo
27-3625-ono-or,
1 4
i
'
---i�1
/
I6F5 f OF rDIN-3
rw,-rw Rn- ntTP' A mnl I KIT
CHECK ISTER
I C6 -17 -1 ;flGE 21
ACCOUNT NO. rNw. N P.O. A MESSAG--
2100,
*
iF3719 5
29.40
MAUREEN EROCK6AY
WORK
SCLE
23-3625-000-CO
---'16/05-/85
20.40
*
7.,00
JO FRENCH
WORK
SlCLC
23-3625-000-CO
7.00
•
21. ^C
PAT GREER
%ORK
SCLE
23-3625-GOO-00
21.'0
•
168777
06/15/85
94.50
AN HAEFLE
WORK
SOLC
23-3-625:000-00
94.50
*
loe 7-q
''61-51F�
7.66
BARB HANS01
WCRK
SCLD
23-3625-000-00
7.66
*
1687n9
u6 %r5 /8`.
5.25
BARB "ARRTCK
WORK
SOLC
23-3625-000-00
- - -- -
5.25
68 7 1'
16871 "
J6 fr:5 8 5
2A.00
BARB LUNDGREN
WCRK
SCLE
23-3625-000-OC
28.10
*
168711
06/05/85
10.15
MARGARET MCDOWELL
WORK
SOLO
23-3625-000-OC
10.15
*
168712
"6/C5/85
3.4C
E---TT7- OLS14
WORK
SCLE
23-3625-000-OC
8.40
*
166113
U6/C5/E5
5.60
CLARICE OLSON
WCRK
SCLO
23- 3625 -00 -
5.60
*
1o8714
C6/i5 /E5
4.20
BETTY PEDDIE
WCRK
SCLO
23-3625-000-00
4.20
*
168715
C6/C5/E5
38,50
MOLLIE PAULSON
CCNT
SERV
23-42CO-610-t1
38.5U
168716
.-6/05/E5
4.20
LOIS PETZ---L
REFUND ART CENTER
23-3500-000-00
4.20
r-- 168717
J6 /O5 /85
3.00
SUN COUNTRY ENTERP
TYPE
SETTING
23-4 2 04- 610- 6 1
-20.
166 1 IR
U6/0/85
^0
NACMI JOHNSON
PAYMENT AFT CTR
23- 4504 - 611 -61
20 . (� 0
168715
26/C5/E5
49667.50
GORECKI & COMPANY
STUMPS
10-4200-353-30
4 P'P,6 7 . 50
*
16872'
C6 /C5 /E5
84. "0
BILL DIETRICHSCN
INST
ART CTR
23-41CO-614-61
94.90
*
168721
Q6/C5/E5
30 10 a
MARGARET LEE
INST
ART CTR
23- 4100- 614 -61
30.00
t.
19F5 CITY OF EDIN%. CHECK REGISTER C6 -17 -85 PACE 22
rucrtr �!r_ n ?TC AMlltlfliT UCRRIra TTG'M r1CCrGTCTTPK Arrfl1INT N(1_ Tk1,_ M D_f1_ it NCQCAGC
2
2
722___-
__C6-/.J5. /_8 -5-
1_21.0.0
MARION WARD
INST ART CTR
23- 4100- 614 -61
3
4
4
S
0
12. ^.11 +
_ -_ - -_ ]
° 168723
06 /r5 /E5
995•.':0
ARFS TREE SERVICE
RrMCVAL
10 -4200- 353 -3C
7
0
7
0
995 .90
to
° _168724
_ -_-
`:6/ ^5/85_•___-_
61.25
DANS REGISI $ERV
WATER TREATMENT
26 -4622- 682 -68
„
-
10
61.25 •
a
4
168725
16/115/95
6.67
CCLLEFN PAULUS
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 480 -48
tt
,4
6.67 +
14812F- __•_-
.6/f_5/85
156.70
E- RgARDT COMPaNY
OVER 'FaYMEAT
40- 3525 - 000 -00
.c
10
,7
156.'0 •
2'
e 168727
06/r6/F!
365.63
THE PETERSON GROUP
WRONG APCLNT
40- 3525- 000 -OC
2'
168727
76/05/8!
365.63
THE PETERSON GROUF
OVFRPAYMIZAT
40 -3525- 000 -00
° 166727
06/C7/85
316.64
THE PETERSON GROUP
CVERFAYPEAT
4C- 3525- 000 -00
z
727
- U.6 /..D4 /P �.�
'65.53-
�j P"TR50N GROUP
CORFECTIIP
40- 3525 - 000 -CC
22 168727
6 /C.6 /8!
365.53-
THE PETERSON GROUP
CCRR-ECTICh
40- 3525- 000 -00
73
316.64 •
3 "')
24
166/28
J6/ ^.j /85
88.72
SUBURBAN DAIRY DIST
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
°
27
88.72 •
"I
z0 - 168729
16/051E
215.98 215.98
CLOVER LEAF CREAM CO
CCNCESSICNS
-
27- 4624- 664 -66
- -- - - -�.3I
20
30
215.°8
_
166730
06/115/85
250.00
CONALD HALL
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
168730
006/C5/F5
250 .70 -'
DONALD HALL
CCRRECTICK
10- 3180 - 000 -00
4_
�Ar
33
+
15 168731
:6 /r5 /E5
155.`0
CAROL KEARNEY
APBULANCE REFCNC
10 -3180- 000 -00
4`
47I
155.00 *
37
30 168732
06/CS/E5
610.98
UNITED PROPERTIES
OVERPAYPEAT
40 -3525- 000 -OC
30 -- ----- ----._- .--
40
- - ---- --
610.98 *
1--
41 168733
06/C5/85
53.30
STEWART HAHN
WAGES
10 -4250- 622 -62
-
n2 _
53.30 +
4-
A4 168734
06/115/85
3013 ."1
CLEAN FLO LAB
INDIAN 'HEAD LAKE
10- 2242- 000 -00
]r
.c
at7
- ---- --- --;
47 166135
06/C5185
207.x.75.10
FIRST BANK MPLS
UNAFP SURFLUS
66 -2490- 000 -00
p..
`c
207075.00 +
e:
711 • f i f f i
7t
frfwCKS �]
S2 168137
06/x4/85
660.00
MPLS g SUB SEWER B
CANT REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 803 -8C
-`
53
5.
660.00 •
70
71
7;
16873N
06/04/85
33.00
LEROY LISK
CLEANING SUFFLIES
10- 4512- 440 -44
'=
S0
�7
33.00
7 j
1 98 5 r OF ED INA
CHECK N! DATE 3MOUNT
CHECK ISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
C6-1 7-,' AGE 23
ACCOUNT NO. IAV. b P.O. A MESSAGE ~
2
2'
3
_- 168739
C6V4185
-
41.71
EVELYN CARYSON
OVERPAYPENT
40- 3525 - 000 -00
3
4
11.71
•
]
A
_ lbit74_
�6 /C4 /E5
32.60
PKN STDTE DOCUMENT
OCCUPENTS
1C -4502- 490 -49
a
7
e
32.60
•
iu
°
168741
76/4/85 _
2_.50
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 12_0 -12
loo 741
J6/�41E5
2.30
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
C E N SUPPLIES
10- 45C4- 20C -2C
-'
"
10 °741
6/111E5
2.30
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 200 -20
14I
i2
168741
o /11tE5
6.-'0
RC I3r_NTIFICeTTONG
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
F
168741
06/10/85
7.59
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
168741
06 C4 /85
2.JO
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 490 -49
a
"
10 °742
6 /C4 /E5
445.63
EARRET MCVING
FREIGHT
10- 4292 - 184 -18
"
°
445.63
•
u
2=
168743
C6 /C4 /E5
75.99
CITY OF RICHFIELD
CGHT & POSER
10- 4252- 345 -30
Z�
2,
75.''9
+
23
1o8744
16/C4/E5
1.000.70
KEMSSON INDUSTRIES
CCNT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 301 -3C
d,
26
166745
J6/04/85
1,467.08
HENN CTY TREASURER
RLBBISH FEPCVAL
10 -4250- 353 -30
L467.�9
+
29
'lo8746
J6/'4/85
62.50
PARK NICOLLET PARK
PHY EXAM
10- 4246 - 260 -26
'
3^
1od746
:J6/C4/85
106.50
PARK NICOLLET,PARK
PHY EXAM
10- 4246 - 301 -30
3
3.
32
169. ^0
+
��
33
_- 168.747,__
-. -_ 06 /Q4 /E5
73 .
OMNITRON
RADIO E9UIF
10 -4914- 422 -42
:I
3]
73. ^0
•
- - -- ..�
39
168743
06/C4/85
237.21
HILB ART a DRAFTING
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23 -1209- 000 -00
237.21
+
39
68749 _
__...�6<^.4_ 8_`_�__- _ -_
-_� 50•V0
-5
EDINA COMMUNITY CTR
FOOTBALL EQUIP
10- 4592 - 627 -62
41
0 .7"
- -_ -'
- -- 1
-
1o87S�)_-
06/04 /N5
9.91
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
REPAIR FARTS
40- 4540- 801 -EG
- -I
9.01
•
-
"d
4�
_ ____168751_ _._
_. 06./C4/85
- --
270.'00
YL SEP,VICE LIGHTING
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
I_
43
47
270.00
•
51
•1O_
10 8.752
C6 /L'4 /E5
19.90
ACE MANUFACTURING
REPAIR FAFTS
40- 4540 - 802 -8C
c +J
4'
!O
19.90
.
5CI
61
16875336/
'14/85
45.50
D C ANNIS SEWER
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
!3
70
5"
1687-)4
C6 /C5 /E`_
250.00
SHORE
AMBULANCE FEFUNC
10 -31fb- 000 -CC
]"
!�
250.00
+
l3
7"
_�_6 6/85
762.91x'
KLEENSWELL
rnNT SERY
m- 67nn- S7n -S7
7]
. l"^5 r171
OF ":^^
cn7cn FEozsrFn
ce~17~85 pAo7- 24
'
' c*rc"�m.
'
o.-c
-'
�°:V
-
'
'
�o�- '�.�._w wcs�w�_____
|
�
r�x,vD ^
!� �
��__-_.---------------
rcoc�xL �,Dxsn
crw� ssRx
r
| lot m,
36/` '6'/E 5� ----------�
.�--v
- nuca
�-�-10-4_ 2CO-500-50-----' ----- - L
kIZveo 07-rz-o'm '----------pPLAGUES
|
n °
62m4.
�
� ] m»/,"
_,*/'o/��
,,:i5 5.04----
':%?cRLAcH'n cCUwrsY
-''PEcEPTION----------'-1�_w;C����~��
1
1,�o.o4 °
( `
/ �*e/,v
'o��uu�- ---
'
----' --------------'
oArrTmcno
ocw ooppL TES
- /
' vo~m�4�i�����------
29.1'
/
7v.�r °
'
!J
�^rt /"�
u *�'��-�---
, ^
-�-� ---' ' -
I 7 ocrwTcc :wc
--- -- ----------'------
:xsu*AmcE
'-
1o~4zm-����vC
/ ]
6966 �.�c °
16u71 1
06/`6m5
�
- - ---'----------- --- -- - �
»n-*z�*~mu-m
', -
''= -°."
"uvEx/a,zns
1
1 rz
^ ~
�
i
� ,
) ^ ,+/
s/c�/"�
�s�./5
--
xzL'�SsaVzcEs --
-- —�---
-'c�m�����-------'-----
^`~' ~^~"
' - --
~ ~
�o ��co-vzO ��
'
453.'5 ^
|`
- -------------'--
joro~ns
87 .97
.
ncp^zn p»nrs
|
�/p' 4C-671-6t '- ----- -- '
'-
--
E z so rcxznIN
|
n7,p7 ^
�°1D,') /o^
Jm'6 /"�
� '
5m.
-
rLcn----- w0;' NOnuAcx ----'��ov����
--'-'-----
��~�������^~�� --
`uu/`~
z�/'o/e�
�'.m
r�m�.�cc vnvo^cx
wzLcuoc .
1c~*208~184~1x
|
- ap�,a�
/ 1687+5
r6/a1c5
»°:D
oLcnu x*nxnw
ccnucE S
10~4120~184~1c '|~
mnr��
�o�ru/o5
1.96
-'
-s��mwy�
x~7w-�_-__
'
.
7.96 °
|
�
16u766
�
»/c«/�----
------a � _
���«�J�-��lpxc
ER VICE3
�
1z~4120~84~18
�
' 7 o 6
|
�m/rmm
_16 ---' -- --- -
' ~m4-vc
/
'
ovr.va °
"
~
./
^0 67 6 1
'u/o
216.7,0 ----'HtRR'-`cL.
N.- ---'---
---S�RVzCES ------ -
i
-10_4120-194 - 18 -
|
lv�m/
)61-61x5
1 1.rn
*«xav wcLzw
n'�mac
'
~
�o~*ano m^~�u
���~,
-
�
'
/
16h 7,S F
mca/us
o.7,c
^mrm 400o
senvIccs
--__-__-_-__---_-- -_- _- ---
10~4120~18*~18 /~
.
- - a.�V-�__-
------
-'---------- '----
�
- ---
� 156 m9
F 5
�.o
au« wouLcv
ocporccS
-- -
vo~*v2O-1o*~vo ) ��
/
_ -_----_---------__--___-
/ .
mur,,
c6/-u/o5
1 o.79
r*csrcn CL' mxor
scnvzccx
_ _
10-4120-184-18
�m 5
3^»2w8ol_--__'-�z�cx�c
vo-��oo-vn^-�u �
'
13.`z ^
-------'-------
- '
l 1uun1 - -
�a/-um"
`'
EeV
[ �
'84- � |�
/ �^u//�
|
-6/761E5
".'"
,^"vLu nxm/vnnxur
MILEAGE
10-4208-184-18 -----------
'j
s o
� ^� °
[J�
. °
_
i
I 9x5 r OF FOINA
CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT
1
z
3
4
6
e
°
A
21
z
2.
2
z
3_
3.
3
3
3e
r 36
31
36
3°
4v
41
44
f 4_
46
47
n:l
so
3,
e2
53
e4
1J
36
CHECK ISTER 0E -17 -, 'AGE 25
_- 1,68772 C
C6 /CE /85 _ 9
9.00 W
WILLARD CTT S
SERVICES 1
10 -4120- 184 -18
16b772 -
J6/C6%S5 1
1 .3 9 L
LILLARD OTT M
MILEAGE 1
10 -42C8- 184 -1E
10.38 +
108773 0
06/Cb/85 1
113.40 P
PAGNUSON SOD S
SOD B BLACK GIRT 1
10- 4562- 642 -64
1o8773 J
J6 /C6 /F5 2
2241.50 P
PAGNUSON SOD S
SOD 6 BLACK CIRT 4
40- 4562- 803 -8C
333.901 *
lo8774 '
'6 /i7 /F5 1
117.52 W
WEST WELD W
WELDING SUPPLIES 1
10- 4610- 560 -56
1
11 7. 52 *
168775 .
.s6/G7/85 1
160.. ?0 P
PARCH DIST INC P
PARIS 1
10- 46e0- 560 -56
16C'.r0 *
168176 C
C6/ 7/85 1
13 ".82 J
JIM HATCH SALES P
PARTS 1
10 -4620- 560 -56
-, 19F5 CITY OF TOWN
ru Cr. .r r) n TP Aunil IUT
CHECK REGISTER GE -17 -85 PAGE 26
1
2
3
___.1..6�7y_____..'96./_1OL£5
128.00
THE PRINT SFIOP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504-510 -51
21
3�
4I
4
5
12Q.nC
5
16t379i,
U6 /1Q /8 `.
1 .664'.1 3
H.O.M.E.INC
RTI MBURSEMENT
10 -11 39- 000 -GO
.I
71
n
7
o
1„664.13
,o
'
_1- 68791il6/1.U1
`_-
,_3_-
EDINA PET H:QS•PITAL
SERVICES
10- 4224 - 470 -47
0
65.67
*----
- - - - --
;
`
16o/92
j6 /in 85
280.00
GLCMMER EVG
�
10- 4248 - 560 -56
P
13
14
289.00
*
oi
5
95.00n1
COPY JUPL ICA�NG
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
70i
16
17
4 5. -� V
f
- _- .- ._- �__ -___.
11I
z7
°
1od/94
�6/1CI85
67.37
HARMON GLASS GLAZING
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
lZr
10
ro
67.37
f
I -.I
''
168795 _�.
,o /10L�.5_
4. -64
VECTOR ONr
SUSSE RJR TICN
10- 4204- 140_14
`Z
168795
J6 /1L /85
4.64
VECTOR ONE
SERVICE45
10 -4226- 420 -42
-�
23
Z4
3
"
168796
6/10'/8`_
21.50
FRED VOGT & CO
HEATING PERMIT
10- 3125- 000-GC
168796
Q, 6 /1 ES
11.50
FRED VOGT & CO
GAS PERMIT
10- 3125 - 000 -OC
7 _S6- _ ------
':'.b /.1G_ / ?5 -- --
_29._50
��.C.D V4.SiT_g_C..C.
hEA.TING PERMIT
10- 3125 - COO -CO
--
`'
168796
;6/10'/85
3.00-
FRED VOGT & CO
CLERICAL CFAFGE
10 -3800- 000 -CG
59.50
160797
u6 /10 /E`.
39664.52
LAM RELATIONS
CCNT SERV
10- 4200- 140 -14
39664.52
*
^
<rl
34
16o79F X6/10/85 3,372.00 WEHRMAN CONSULTANTS CCNSTRUCTIGN 10- 1455- 000 -CG
3x372. ^7
,7I
r
3'
168799
:;6/10/85
269730.70
KENO CONSTRUCTION
CCNSTRUCTIGN
27- 1300 - 000 -00
e
so
39
�:6/10/E5
269733.10
•
"
_ 31?.70 SECURITY CONSULTANTS CCNT SERV 1C -42CO- 646 -64
1688 ^n
41
31.'0
•
"
168801
;6/10 /E5
348.63
ROLIN B CHILDS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 390 -30
ee
44
4'3
348.63
rr
`8
168802
6/10 E5
15.57
EICE SAW SERVICE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -3C
16'
--
15.57
*
P .
"
Iso
168803
06/10 /E5
62.09
GARDNER.HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
62.09
*
168804
^6/1J/85
622.50
HENN CTY TREASURER
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10- 4250 - 353 -30
622.50
*
,
7^
71
[';d
168805
06/10/85
34.20
IRMA KURMIS
WORK SOLD
23- 36225- 000 -00
34.20
75
' 19m5 . OF ,om°
-''
cxscw zorcn
^~=°- ^-~~~` `--~ ----'---
co~1r~/ '^oc xr
180 C0
PICHON HESBST
WCRK SCLC
23-36 25- GO G- CC
166S77
6/1C/F5
2 70
CKS
c6/11/E5
260.00
DAY DIST
IKVENTORV
50-4630-862-Et
168814
q6/11 /F5
2 31 .3 Z:
GARDNER REFRID
CONI REPAIRS
28-4248-707-70
168S 2'-1
06/11 /85
586.95
RTW INC
INSLRANCE
10— 4 2 60— 510— 51
168821
�6/11/85
6, 550.27
VIDEO MlOwEST
CABLE TV
10— 2 149— 000— 0 0
168F22
06/11185
36*00
GREATER, MPLS AREA
OFFICE SUFPLIES
10- 4 5 16— 200- 20
1666Z3
-0/11/85
175 rQ
UNIVERSITY OF PIN
CONF & SCHOOLS
10— 42C2— 140-14
p
s
b
v
i
P
1985 CITY OF ED INA
rucry r,r n�tr
CHECK REGISTER
C6 -17 -85 PAGE 28
z
3
1017.44
z
3
°
168825
6/11/85
13.50
POOLSIDE
CHEMICALS
26- 4564- 689 -6E
'
'
13.50 +
a
�
a
9
'
168826
06/11/85
82.25
BROTHERS MGMT CORP
CCNCESSICNS
10- 4624 - 620 -62
'
°
°
82.25 +
'°
„
0
1ti8 ?27
6/11/85
32.75
PRENTICE '-TALL
SOOKS
10- 4502 - 600 -60
- - - -- —- -� - -''
z
32.75 *
=
168828
06/12185
275.50
LARISA GRAUZE
R.':GISTRATICN
10- 4100— X27 -62
14
275.50 *
lA6c29
— 6/12/Q5
15.-0
MARY FtUICHER
REFLNC SWIMMING
10 -35 CC— CCO —CO
”
ie
15.00
'
168830
96/12/85
15.00
LYNNAE ANDERSON
REFUND TENNIS
10- 3500 - 000 -00
15.G0
`Z
168831
)6/12/85
15.r?0
MACY GILLIKSEN
REFLND
10- 3500- 000 -OC
--
73
15.00
L
32
168832
C6/12/85
17.!?0
IAN FRYKMAN
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 —CC
3-
1,
17.00 •
= -1
°
168853
76/12/85
1,3C4.-4u
LERSSCHEN
SERV LEGAL
10- 4218- 220 -22
1 ,304. 110
168834
16/12/85
487.•36
CASCI DECORATORS
CONSTRUCTIGN
26 -1300- 000 -00
^'
33
4E7.06 +
3A
168835
6/12/85
46.39
EDINA REALTY
OVERPAYMENT
40- 3525— COC —CO
°"
39
46.39 •
<�
'r
108856
0,6/12/85
546.25
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES
10- 4200 - 500 -50
J°
39
546.25 *
14'
a0
168x.37
U6/12/t`_
1 +7,167.50
.;OE GREUPNER
LESSCNS
27- 4100 - 675 -66
^
10,167,59 *
—
9c
168334
;76/12/85
645.00
MORRIS NORMAN 8 ASSO
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 500 -50
64500 *
179
ar
1681'39
s 'D6/12/85
185,747.56
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SLR
40- 4312 - 801 -8C
'
185,747.56
"^
168840
96/12/85
2,749.00
NORDWEST BUILDERS
CONSTRUCTION
10- 1428 - 000 —GO
sC
9+
_
2,749.00
•�
52
168F41
6112/P5
3,605.1;0
VERSATILE VENTCLES
MACE 8 EQUIP
27- 1340 — COO -09
73
.A
3,605.—' 0
70
7,
168842
06/12/85
1,00'1.00
MAIN HURCMAN
AUDIT
10- 4216- 160 -16
73
sa
s�
!68842
G6 /12185
607.90
MAIN HUROMAN
ALDIT
15- 2450 - 000 -GO
1985 -Y OF E01KA
1 •
rw; r_ n2 TF AMMINT
v- Nnr)
CH=CV SISTER
C6 -17- PAGE 29
TTFB nFSrRTP1TnN ArrmiNT Nn. TNY. 5 P.O. FSSAGF
- -
- - ir-- - -
- -.. _
_ _- 1
2 1
168842 2
26/12/85 1
10 ^.0 0 R
RAIN HURDMAN A
AUDIT 2
23- 4216 - 610 -61
1688420.6/12185 1
100+ - "1 ^ M
MAIN HURDMAN A
AUDIT 2
26- 4216- 688 -68 _
_ al
108842 -
- -1 6/12/85 9
90 ^..`0 M
MAIN HURCMAN A
AUDIT 2
27- 4.216- 660 -66 '
'
a 1
158842 6
6/12/P5 7
7a ^,. ^C M
MAIN HURCF "AN A
AU017 2
28- 4216- 7C6 -70
s 1
168842 -
L6 /12 /8S 1
10 11.10 M
MAIN HURCMAN A
AUDIT 2
29 -4216- 720 -72 A
AI
168841 0
- L
2 '100-1111 M
MA TN HURDMAN A
AUDIT 0
0-4 -13-%8 0 - 7 6 9
9
168842 _
_6112/85 6
600+.30 M
MAIN HURCMAN A
AUDIT 5
50- 4216 - 820 -82 1
10
„
a 1
168842 C
C6/12/95 6
6 C 0 C M
MAIN HURDMAN A
ALDIT 5
50- 4216 - 840 -84
+O.__- .
.1 6 8 94 2 - - -
- -- !.6/12/85 6
60 ^ I
IIN HURCMAN A
AUDIT 5
5n -4216- 860- 86- -
-- - -__._ 3I
" 1
168942 0
06/12/85 6
60C.n0 h
h0.IN HURDMAN A
AUDIT 6
66- 2490 - 000 -00
" 1
168£43 0
06/12/85 3
32 .G^ C
CONNIE SIMONS R
REFLNO SUIPPING 1
10 -3500- 000 -00
32.+3 L1 •
•
17 1
163244 !
! :6/12/F5 7
79432.80 P
PROWN & C?IS INC P
PAYMENT 6
60- 2040- 000 -00 ;
;)
°
79432. 0 +
+ {
T
{{
1985 CITY OF �D7_,'I,
rwrrw tup- A.1 Ir r, P u Al I A T
CHECK REGISTER
wc- idn ro TT7W nrCrcTPTTmd
0E -17 -85 PACE 30
ArrniikT NO- Thlb- A 0-n- h MC'IZCAIM;'
2
1159766*9,7
FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISFESSARY FUND
3
3 49,214.73
FUND 6r TOTAL _c_QN_Sl_WUlSN_F U.N 0
7 2079675.90
FUND 66 TOTAL IPP BONE FEOEPFTION #2
1906F9339.25
TOTAL
7
7
17
2•1
27
'.2
-3
74
27
3
3
4�
47
.1 1
37
is
39
40
41
jII
4'1
31
rr
52
53
71
711
t5
7,•
y � P
y 1985 C. CF EDINA CHECK R,STER 05 -31 -85 -AGE
s CHECK-ND: DA MOUN EN00 TEM- DEStRIPTiON ACCOUNT-NO� - it
INY.-P:O: p- MESSAGE --
, 106138 06/10/85 76.51- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ; j+
_..__1 ^;6138 "" -O6l10 "185 3025043`— fD- PHILLIPS-"_---- 5f)- 4626- 862- 86-- - ----- -- -- MANUAL
39748.92 •
a•ra --- - - - -"- - a•a -CKS
i
s 120271 06/10/85 60.19- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL
;� -- 120271 - - 06/10185- - --- -900--1 50 -4626- 862 -86 - - -- -- -- MANUAL -I
120271 06/10/85 29875.23 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
29824.04 •
•9999• aar -CKS
""- 1271267 -- 06110/85— 3x2:44 — CAPrTIt CITY-DISTRI -- 50- 4628 - 822 -82— - -- - MANUAL "
�,7I 12112.67 06/10/85 9090 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL
121067 06110/85 722.45 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL
-''127C6T�D6110'185 4 33.-28 — CAIPI- nt- CITV-DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 - -- - --- -- MANUAL - --
1.,t� 127067 06/10/85 11.25- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL
121067 06/10/85 14.40 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL
121067- "C6/101E5 435.53��— CAPITAL CITY- DISTRI- 50- 4628 - 862 -86- - -- -- -- MANUAL -
i:-3----127067 06/10/85 433.28- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I'!
127067 66/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL j'I�
2706/ 0 6/1"8 -5 11 : 25=— `-- CAPITAL— CITY -DI STRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL —
y�, 121067 06/10/85 435.53- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL
j2, 127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
yh� `- '127067' 06110/85 435:53 CA PIT AL-Cl TT- DISTRI' - 50- 4628- 862- 86---- -- --- -- --`14ANUAL
127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - !
I„ 127067 06/10/"85 433.28- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I„
127067 U"6y10Y85 11 -25= t1iPrm--CITY- DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 - -- MANUAL -
�:. 127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4
121067 06/10/85 433.28 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
,� - 1271267 -- 06/10/85 435:53 - CAPITAL CITY- DISTRI -- 50 -4628- 862- 86'- ---_..---._. - --- MANUAL -
y;< 127067 06/10/85 11.25- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
L 127067 06/10/85 433.28 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
- 1270:67- 06710785 1.25 CAP ITAt-CI"Tt -OISTR 1 50-4628-862-86----- ---MANUAL -
�; -.i 674.66
- - -. a a a a. ;� ._._ - _____— - - - -- -- - ---- - - -.._ -a • a. C KS -._ I"'i
r„ 127129 06/10185 29532.85 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �.
-; 127129 - O6r10%8S - 504:50 8E L-8O 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - ---- MANUAL
127129 06/10185 29201.80 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
( 59239.15 a
r 7 •aa -CKS'
11 127135 0- 5120 -/85 1-:96 = CAGLE- rN ISCOUN 50- 3710 - 003- 00--- ---MANUAL 127135 06/10/85 9.57- EAELE MINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL
° 127135 06/10/85 11.33- EAGLE MINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL
127135 -- 06/10/85 .OS-- EAGL"TNE- 50- 3710 - 842- 84--- - - -- - -- MANUAL`
127135 06/10/85 13.22- EAGLE NINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL
II, 127135 06/10/85 25.07- EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL
rj_127135 Oa710T8Y 25 :t?7 EASL1`MTN 50- 3710 - 862 -8d —MANUAL----
II 127135 06/10/85 25.07 EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL
127135 C6/10185 909 EAGLE MINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL
S �
1985 CITY CF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE
e
MOUN
_
TEM- D£SCRIPTI-ON CCOUNT -NO-i INV.— M- P:O. - -U
MESSAGE-- -
-,IF—CHECK
�'
127135
06/10/8
.31
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
I'
MANUAL I;
I -
I____
-' 127135
'-- C6 /101ES-
— "5:18��"`�EAIILE`VIN
50 -3710- 862- 86-- - - - ----
MANUAL- - -'7-1
-
127135
06/10/85
418.70
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
^!
121135
06/10/85
4004 --
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-
-- 127135 — 06/10-18
660;78
EAGLE`VINt.
50- 4628- 842 -84 - -- -- -
-- MANUAL �!
127135
06/10/85
566.49
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
°I
127135
06/10185
19253933
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
127135 --
66/10/85
":253.33
EAGLE - NINE - - --
- -50 -4628- 862 -86 - -- — -
--- MANUAL --
.,I--
127135
06/10/85
1500-
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
i l
-
127135
--
06/10/85
4950-
EAGLE VINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
127135 --
06/10/85
53:33-
EAGLE -WIN
50- 4628- 862 -86 —' --
-- MANUAL
.,
127135
,127135
06/10/85
C5/20/E5
258.79
97.80
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
INVENTORY 50- 4632 862
MANUAL
,
;,
3:226: 2 0 -:
- -86
- - -- --- - -
MANUAL
- - -- ___- --- - -.I_.�
.,
IN f f
I•'
+ ++-CKS
127138
06/10/85
10.29-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
-,1
127138
06/10/85
10000-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
_``'-
"127138
"- "06/10185-
05 9-9—
50- 3710 - 822 -82 - - --' ---
MANUAL --
o' -,
127138
06/10/E5
2.DO-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
-
127138
06 /10 /E5
23.47-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -E4
MANUAL
- 127135 0671078
7i 66-
HIL"LIPS
- 50 -3710- 842 -84
-MANUAL
ti - =�
127138
06/10/85
13.25-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
127138
06/10/85
4.00-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
127138 U67107E5
-- 19'19=
ED "PHILL ?PS
- 50 -3710- 842 -84 - - "
- -- MANUAL --'-
e•I
127138
06/10/85
18.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
-
I.
127138
06/10/E5
85.26-
ED PHILLIPIS
5C- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL ;;I
t,,
— 127138 L'i6 /10 /8
6:-35 ED _PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
- -- MANUAL-----!I
+••
127138
06/10/95
4.18 -.
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
127,138
06/10/85
97.83-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
1271 38---
C6/10/E5
T .15-
ED- PHIL"LIAS
50- 3710 - 862 =86 - -- '
-.•- MANUAL -
127138
U6/10/85
11928-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL '
127138
u6/10/85
20.56-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
;-
127138 - -Ub "/10785
9.35 -
-ED- PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86 - - --
-- MANUAL - - --
+' „I
127138
U6/10/85
499.75
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL -
�,
127138
06/10185
49263.16
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL I• -J
`127138
- t36i10185
467;50— ET-PHILLIPS-
50- 4626- 862- 86- ' - - - ---
----MANUAL - -
127138
06/10/85
4,891.69
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
:-
127138
06/10/85
817.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
,!
127138 -- 0671078
514 - :50 ED'-PHILLIP
50- 4628- 822 -82 ^ -_
- FANUAL ' --
+
127138
06/10/85
429.50
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
127138
C6/10/E5
662.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -64
MANUAL
- --
127138
'U6710IS5
959.25
ED- PHILLIP
50- 4628 - 842 -84 i
- -° MANUAL -
127138
06/10/85
382.75
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
--
127138
U6/10/85
918.50
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127138
II67107E5
200:n0
E"HILLIP
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127.138
06/10185
1,173o46
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127.138
Q6/10185
100000
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
I'=
1271382
6/10 /85-
564 X00 'ED -PH ILLIm
50- 4628 - 862 -86--
' "MANUAL” °"
127138
06/10/85
1 9028.15
ED PWILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
17,4
127138
06/10185
209.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862-86
MANUAL
5
1375
�
5TH
50m-4-628= 862 =8d
ANUAC-
+I.a
1$070.10,+
e
1985 C. OF EDINA CHECK h STER 05 -31 -85 .,GE 3 !
— CHECK -NO: OukTE AMOUNT VENDORi£M- OESCRIPI-i-ON- ACCOUNT- NO.— INY.-A-P.0.-# MESSAGE- -- - -�,
-q
--- -12'7190
-06/10/85
MANUAL
-GRIGGS-"COOPER--AND-
12-.40-
�.
127190
06/10/85
63987-
GRIGGS COOPER AND
MANUAL
121190
U6/10/85
.63.44-
GRIGGS COOPER AND
._ 1271 9006 /10-IE 5
619;20
GRIGGS- COOPER-A NO--
— IRITElt0NTINENTAL
12'7190
06/10/85
3,193.72
GRIGGS COOPER AND
�r
19
127190
06/10/85
3,172.22
GRIGGS COOPER AND
1,1
- - - - - --
-- --
-- 6;'846.03. -► —�—
—_
I+ 1
'��,� ♦f +fff
50- 3710 - 822- 82-----
-- - --- - MANUAL---- --'.•�
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
,MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82 --
- - - - -- MANUAL — �v
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
INTERCONTINENTAL
i
127271
06/10/65
15.88-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
127271
06/10/85
.70
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
— 127271
06/10/85
3:24 =
— IRITElt0NTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 822- 82-- -- -- - ---
MANUAL - - --
„
127271
06/10/85
5.92-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
L
127271
06/10/85
113.03-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
1-12
7 2 71 -- 06/10785
?5:-68 - I'N TER C0NTTNENTAL
-PK
50 -3710- 862 -86 -
-- MANUAL --
-�
127211
06/10/85
35.35-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
`I
127271
06/10/85
2.40
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
-�
-- 12?2?1---G6/1O/85'
- 6.60 —
INTERCONTINENTAL
-PK-
50 -4626- 822 -82 --
-- MANUAL
127271
06/10/85
794.15
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
127211
06/10/-85
19162.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
127271 06/10/85
27.- 30INTERC- ONIINENTAL -PK
0- 4626- 842 -84
- -- MANUAL_-__
127271
06110/85
5,651.67
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
127271
06/10/85
18960
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
`-
127271
- 06710785
--31784:4-4— INTERCONTINENTAL
PK- �`-
50 -4626- 862 -86 - --`-- -----
-MANUAL -
n
127271
06/10/85
296.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
FK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127271
06/10/85
2010
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
°I
fffaff
-
+ + + -CKS
127285
06/10/85
5.78-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
s
127285
06/10/85
3.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL I i�
— 127285 06/10 - /85
z 0.49 - JOHNSON -WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84 —
- MANUAL -
127285
06/10/85
18.29 -,
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
127285
06/10/85
6.94-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL `
- 127285106/10/85
—2:64-
JO*iNSON --WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86—
--PANUAL --
127285
06110/85
11.41-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�;.,
127285
06/10/85
13.85-
JOHNSON .WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
— 127285 b6 110"5
9024:9Q
JOHNSON-11INE
-50- 4626 - 842 -84 ----- - -
---- MANUAL——
L.I
127285
0.6/10/85
4.50
JOHNSON MINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
I
127285
06/10/85
28940.6
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
127285- ---
U,6/10/85
-3:00 - +' JOHNSON -WINE
50- 4628- 822- 82- - -- - --
MANUAL -
�„
127285
06/10/85
167.25
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANLAL i..
127285
06/10/85
3960
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
--
127285
II6/10185
914w7l -----
JOHNSON -WINE
50- 4628 +842 -84- ----
MANUAL- --
L,I
127285
06/10/85
17.70
JOHNSON VINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127285
06/10185
347.48
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL �-
: =1-
- 127285 - - -
- -C6 /10185
3:60
40'HNSON-WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
127285
06/10/85
570.55
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
127285
06/10185
132.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
4• -5
27 285—' 0-611018 -.
127285 06/10/185
mo -.4a
8.70
JOHNSON'-WIN
JOHNSON WINE
-50- 4628 -862 -8 6
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL-
MANUAL
,<
I
'I -„
121285
06/10/85
692.97
JOHNSON .WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
_
71
1905 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-31-85 PAGE 4
6
--- CHECK-IM-9-UXTE
AMOUINI
VENITOR ilCK--DES-CR7FTT-CN—ACCOUNT-NOo--INV:#-P:O.-It
MESSAGE
127285
06/10/85
60
JOHNSON MINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
4-9-106 0-218
*-CK S
17
12F433
06/10/85
221.88
PAUSTIS & SONS
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
J121433
u6/10/85
4.25
PAUSTIS & SONS
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
-_
2260 3--47—
CKS
127435
06/10/8!
83-
PRIOR WINE CO
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
127435
06M/E5
2*74-
PRIOR MINE CO
50-3710-842-64
MANUAL
50-4626-842-84-----
- - - --- MANUAL
1�71
127435
06/10/85
137:35
PRIOR MIKE CO
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
174.93
J
•**-CKS
127451
—G6 / 10 f 8 5-
.11 QUALITY-wrNE
MANUAL
127451
06/10/e5
*27
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
127451
C6/10i85
.27-
QUALITY MINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
12745T U 67107 9
:54
U AL-r T Y- V I NE
50-3 710-842-8 4------
MANUAL
127451
66M/E5
3*87-
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-842-E4
MANUAL
1'7
127451
06/10/85
19099-
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
i---
-
5 - 1 7= —.QUALr
TY''WT NE'
50-3710-842-84--
MANUAL
127451
96/10/85
23:80-
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
127451
06/10/25
12.09-
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
&-e58----------9UACTTT-79INE—
-50-3710-862-86—'---------
M A N U A L
127451
06 /10 /E
099-
QUALITY VINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
i 127451
06/10/85
17*99-
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
12 74 51—C-
6/107-2
--; 1'2--QUALT-T-T-WT
NE
MANUAL
127451
06/10/85
1,258.68
QUALITY WINE
50.4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
127451
06/10/85
1,190.46
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
'1--127451
06170785
6:45-
O UALT TY-,WI N
!0-4626-862-86---
MANUAL
127451
06110/E5
49*94
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
127451
06/10/85
5.56-
QUALITY MINE
50-4628-822-U
MANUAL
--12745r - - - =6/10 /85
i 3.68w--DUALITY-WTNE-
50-4628-842-84
127451
06/10/85
13995-
QUALITY MINE
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
I-
127451
(16/10/E5
193*80
QUALITY WINE
50 -4628-842-84
IWAN LAL
-,I
12 74 5 u 6 10 lf 5
Y-99-66
QUAUTTY-VTNL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
127451
06/10/85
1 3o68
QUALITY MINE
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
127451
06/10/85
329*46
QUALITY MINE
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
`127451
—U6 /1C 785
8 990' 5; 2--CUl
OLI TY-VINE
50-4628-862-86------
MANUAL
17
127451
U6/101E5
604e50
QUALITY MINE
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
127451
05/20/85
24*50
QUALITY PINE INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
MANUAL
94-15
ale,
ffff.f
***-CKS
127540
06/10/85
14.44-
TWIN CrTY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
127540
06/10185
5*67-
TWIN CITY MINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
I -11-127
1-3-o-50
ul N-t-TT7--V IN L
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL —j.:
127540
06110M
722.34
TWIN CITY WINE
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
;4 1
l
17
127540
06/10/85
5910
TWIN CITY WINE
50-46 28-862-86
MANUAL
75
'
6
1985 C OF EDINA CHECK K. _STER 05 -31 -85 .AGE 5
I—CHECK-NO-.OA-TLNOUN Vt NO OR &ITE"ESC-WIP-rltk—ACCOUNT-140i-IRV.�--a P:O. -A MESSAGE-
1127 5 4 06110/85 283971 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
- _....-
... -9004w54
--1 ,004 :5 4 -
I
3 6
06/10/85
6.75
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
-
-- 134067 --
06/1078
38:65 `
— - CAPITAL -CITY
DISTRi
Ie
134055
05/20/85
35.00
BRAEMAII GOLF
PETTY CAST.
27- 3410 - 000 -00
ig
134055
(15/20/85
417.89
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASH
27- 4120 - 663 -66
.--
---134055
05/20985
552.50 -
-- BRAEMAR- 60LF- - -• -
-- PETTY-CAS
27- 4120- 664 -66 - -- --
FIT TAL- CITY-
134055
05/20/85
26.74
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASH
27- 4290 - 660 -66
718.20
134055
C5/20/85
95.10
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASF
27- 4292 - 663 -66
05/20/85
13405 5 05/20185
13:40--
BRAAEMAR -GOLF
PETTY -CAS
-27- 4514 - 660 -66
yl,a
134055
05/20/85
53960
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASK
27- 4540 - 661 -66
. -. - - -
134055
05/20/85
42.41
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASH
27- 4620 - 663 -66
-i
-i -- 134055
- 051207E 5
71:E6—
BR -AExAK OLF-
- PETTY -CA-S
-27- 4624- 664- bdV-' ------
19308.50 +
�117
r -c
1 40 7
* ** -CKS I'
MANUAL
MANUAL c
-
MANUAL -
- -r_
MANUAL
MANUAL I.
MANUAL -
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
- *so-CKS - --
w I l Q l * ** * **
3 6
06/10/85
6.75
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
-
-- 134067 --
06/1078
38:65 `
— - CAPITAL -CITY
DISTRi
50 -4628- 822 -82
- -" - MANUAL
--134129-- C6 /10 /E5—
134U67
06/10/85
215.46
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-- 06/10/85
134067
06/10/85
2.70
CAPITAL CITY
OISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
` -s-
13 40 6 7 -- 06 710/8 5
MANUAL
FIT TAL- CITY-
01STRT
50- 4628- 862 -86
-- - MANUAL
i
134067
06/10/85
718.20
CAPITAL CITY
OISTRI
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1r3T3.35
134U67
05/20/85
36.00
CAPITAL CITY
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
MANUAL
,i`
- - --
134135-
5.26 -76�'
-- -242:03
£- AGLE'1iINE—
-- -- --
. -. - - -
w I l Q l * ** * **
e
+ **-CKS
MANUAL
MANLAL
134135
06/10/85
.11
EAGLE WIN_
'
i 134129 06/10•/85
19312.15
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 822 -82
134129 (16/10/85
59558 *70
BELLBOY
50 -4626- 822 -82
50 -3710- 862 -86
--134129-- C6 /10 /E5—
-- 25.620 FFLLBOY
5C- 4626- 842 -84
yl;
134129 06/10/85
19852 *68
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 862 -86
-- 06/10/85
134129 06/10/85
29403 *40
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 862 -86
134135
- 134129 076110/8
661 * -05
- - BELL-810
0- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
134135
11 9762.36
+
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
*** -CKS
1341 -35 06/10/85
5.- 590 A-GL"IN
50- 4628- 842 -84
yI
134135
06/10/85
1r3T3.35
EAGLE WINE
e
+ **-CKS
MANUAL
MANLAL
134135
06/10/85
.11
EAGLE WIN_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
`- 134135 06 -1101-85
6:963
EAGLE' -WIN
--50- 3710 - 842 -84
134135
06/10/85
4.84-
EAGLE MINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
`
134135
66/10/8:
27.47
EAGLE WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
- 134135 ' -
-- 06/10/85
27:47-
EAGLE - VINE"' -'"-
--- ---50- 3710 - 862 -86
�,-
134135
C6/10/E5
27.47-
EAGLE WISE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
134135
06/10/85
848.08
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
*** -CKS
1341 -35 06/10/85
5.- 590 A-GL"IN
50- 4628- 842 -84
yI
134135
06/10/85
1r3T3.35
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
134135
06/10/85
19373.35 -
EAGLE NINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
134135-
06/10Y'85
-- -242:03
£- AGLE'1iINE—
50- 46 28- 862 -86
134135
06/10185
19373.35
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
29408.79 *
e
+ **-CKS
MANUAL
MANLAL
MANUAL --
MANUAL
C
MANUAL
— MANUAL -
I
- - -- - *•• -CKS
-
MANUAL
- -- MANUAL --
i
MANUAL
t
MANUAL
- MANUAL
MANUAL
`,
MANUAL
MANUAL -
-
MANUAL
j Ia
MANUAL
-- - MANUAL -
-
MANUAL
*** -CKS
16
s'
341 -38" CGi1ff/"FS— 6'.''38 T'D'PHiCC2PS 50- 3710- 822 +82 ° - -'-- MANUAL- - -
%;? 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE
F—CHECK-XU.--lTATL
3�
A IlRau N I
VENDF04 TER- QESTRIPTION --ACCOUNT-
NO:- INV•- A- P:O: -'A M
134138
06/10/85
2008-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82
!-
134138
106710785
- - - " -;90
EO- PHILLIPS'
50 -3710= 822 -82- "-- -_-...
,.
134138
1..6/10/85
11.57-
ED PHILLI °S
50- 3710 - 822 -82
�7
134138
06'/10/E5
17.48-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
— 134138 06710 -185
37:99—
ED- PHILLIPS - - --
—50- 3710 - 842- 84 -- - ---
e.Ie
134138
06/10/85
4.00-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
�•,
134138
06/10/85
.62
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
i,
134138'
06/10/8`.
20:28 -- -ED- PHILLIPS " -- -
-- -50- 3710 - 842- 84"-- - ----- --
•i„
134138
06/10/185
33.11-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
154138
06/1D/85
21.53-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
---
134138 U6 /10185
:80-
ED- PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86 --
•,_�
134138
106/10/85
23.57-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
134138
06/10185
33.47-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
IlkI,_�
'
134138-
"U6 /10185
45.03-
-EO- PHILLIPS
_50- 3710- 862 -86 +- -- -
..',-1
134138
06/10/85
1,899.48
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
,r
134138
06/10/85
29251.45
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 862 -86
=,_-
-1341 3i� —C�>10 t£5
578:70 ---
ED-"PHICLIPS
-50- 4628 - 822 -82 -
9.!, -I
134138
06/10/85
45.00-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
J12,
134138
66/10/85
219.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
2-
- "134138
C6 -7 1C/85 ---
1j0(!8- .99
—ED- PHILLIPS'-
50- 4628- 822- 82— _-`-. -- -
•! -,
134138
06/10/85
674.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
`I-
154138
u6/10/85
19655950
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
^-134138 U- 6710185
31.00 ED- PiiICLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84 - --
�' -,
154138
061lC/E5
200.00
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -E4
134138
06/10/85
19014.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
-- 134138- --
06710785 --
—1- 178.29'
ED-PR2LLIPS -
50 =4628- 862 -86 -- - - - - --
�.-
154138
06/10/85
19673.34
ED PHILLIPS
512- 4628- 862 -86
134138
C61lO/F!
19076.25
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
J,
h;
-134 13
- 40: -00ED- PHILLIPS --
50- 4628 - 862 =86 -
„�
134138
05/20/85
204.75
ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
139526.33 *
__
_i
';
134190-- QS/IT"5
GRIGGS- COOPER -AND -C
50= 3710 = 822 -82 ----
76—
.�.;
134190
06/10/85
7089-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 3710 - 822 -82
I --
134190
U6/10/65
33.01-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50 -3710- 842 -84
-,
134190 106/10/85"
P5:74.-
GRIGGS'- COOPER"ANO-
-5'1- 3710 - 862- 86- - - -' -�--
�'•,
134190
u6/10185
80.17-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 3710 - 862 -86
134190
06/10/85
88000-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626- 822 -82
-
34190 "— II6T1078
394:4+4
GRIGGS- COOPER-AND-C
50 -4626- 822 -82 ^ A
134190
U6/10/85
11650.34
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50 -4626- 842 -84
,-
134190
06/10/85
49008.45
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626- 862 -86
1341 90-
u67107
4-9286:87 286.'87-
COOPER AND C --
50= 4626- 862- 86-- -- - -�"
•�m;
109047.09
I3�
134271
06/10/:85
10.91-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -0000 - 862 -86
13 42 71
X6710785
45:65
INTEICONTINENTAL -PK
50-0000-862-86--------
134271
06/10/85
4.50
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -0000- 862 -86
;.:
134271
06/10/85
5.43-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -3710- 822 -82
3R
134271 4 "671018
..O = -
-I NTER-CDNTINENTAL -PK-• "•
50- 3710 - 842 -84
134271
06/10185
.44
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
-T
134271
06/10/85
33.95-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710- 862 -06
s
ESS AGE
"
MANUAL
- MANUAL
MANUAL •
•
MANUAL I
I'
- MANUAL
MANUAL •
•
MANUAL
- PANUAL -
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL` -"
WANUAL
MANUAL •
- MANUAL
-- -
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL it
•i #- CKS - --
MANUAL Ili
MANUAL -"
MANUAL
PANUAL
MANUAL -
MANUAL �74
MANUAL
1985 L OF EDINA CHECK �, _STER 05 -31 -85 AGE 7 I�
I._ tHrECK -N0: OA-TE- AMOUNI VENDOR, - - --- ZTEFrDESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO:- INtl.- p"P.0 * -N MESSAGE
9
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
,MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* * * -CK
.I,
I�f
F.
S ,.
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL -"
MANUAL e
MANUAL
-- MANUAL --
MANUAL
MANUAL
- - MANUAL-
MANUAL 1 A
MANUAL
--- MANUAL - --'
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL
e
- -- ***- CKS --.:
'e
MANUAL
- MANUAL - -
MANUAL
MANUAL �•
MANUAL !
MANUAL
-- MANUAL -
I.
I f
- -- * * * -CKS -
MANUAL
134271
06/10/85
3 *30
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
- -134271-
-06/1Q/85
1�2TD.30�7NTETCONTMENTAL- -PK-
-50- 4626 - 842 -84 ---- "- ------
MANUAL
134271
06/10/85
22 *05-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
134271
06/10/85
19697.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
134271" 06"/10-/85
-9.60
INTERCONTINENTAL -PK
50- 4626- 862 -86 - - - --
1�I
134271
06/10185
271.85
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
"
134271
06/10/85
2.70
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
I,-
i0 8 40 *�'
-- - - - - --
Y, 1
1
134285
06/10/85
3.30-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
v „I
134285
06/10185
5.21-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
- 134285
06/1Q/85
- -13.48=
JOHNSON-UINE
-
50-3710-862-86----
134285
06/10/85
9.88-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
�I
134285
06/10/85
9.28-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
-- 134185
G6/10l8
3400
dONNSON -MINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
1.,,1
134285
06110/85
674.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
y, I
134285
06/10185
4.80
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
L;.,
- 134285 0"6 /10185
260 w6 3-- -'--
JOHNSON -WINE-
50 -4628- 822 -82 -
134285
06/10/85
2.40
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
,,,
134285
06/10/85
165.12
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
134285 C6 -1mit 5
50 -4628- 862 -86
L.!
134285
06/10/85
9.30
JOHNSON MINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
y1.7 71
134285
06/10/85
464.35
JOHNSON .WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
0.6flD/85—
-"-- 494.08
JORN"14- WINE- -”`
--
- 50 -4628- 862 -86 -- - -
-�
2,041.78 •
r
y1-1
134435
05/20/85
.33 -,
PRIOR WINE
INVENTORY
50- 3710- 003 -OC
-
- "134435"
06 /10 7 85—
'05 PRIOR-WINS -CO "-
50- 3710 - 862- 86 - - - - --
134435
06/10/85
.35
FRIOR WINE CO
50 -3710- 862 -86
�,•.
134435
06/10/e5
.35-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 862 -86
134 43 5
06/10 "/85
74-9 - PRIOR- WINE -CO-
-
50- 4628 - 862 -86- - --
06/10/85
17.49
PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
y`-134435
�.
134435
06/10/85
17949-
"PRIOR TWINE CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
:- 134 4 3'5---
u 512 0 /15
16 .49'
PRIOR- qI -rr-
I RVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862- 86- -- --- ---
33.30 +
134451
06110/85
16.54-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
1,-
134451
--06/10/85
13:92✓
QUALITY "WINE- ---
50- 3710 - 822 -82 - - --
134451
06/10/85
10.61-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
y',-
134451
06/10/85
6.11 -
QUALITn WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
-,7-134451
06-110715
:4-T—GUAUTY
-WIN
50 -3710- 822 -82
I-
134451
06/10/85
17.55-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
w
134451
06/10/85
11.25-
QUALITY WANE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
134451 -'-
06/10/85-
44.70=
- 9UALIT77WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -8b'
_
134451
'76/10/85
827.42
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -82
134451
06/10/85
42306
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
Isn—
"134451 U "10785
8T1;9d
QUALITY -WITH
50 -4626- 842 -84 -
-,�
134451
06/10/85
2,235.15
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
134451
C6/10185
696 *2T
QUALITY WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
9
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
,MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* * * -CK
.I,
I�f
F.
S ,.
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL -"
MANUAL e
MANUAL
-- MANUAL --
MANUAL
MANUAL
- - MANUAL-
MANUAL 1 A
MANUAL
--- MANUAL - --'
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL
e
- -- ***- CKS --.:
'e
MANUAL
- MANUAL - -
MANUAL
MANUAL �•
MANUAL !
MANUAL
-- MANUAL -
I.
I f
- -- * * * -CKS -
MANUAL
- MANUAL
'
MANUAL
I Q
MANUAL
- MANUAL
- --
MANUAL
i.
MANUAL
MANUAL--'---
-
MANUAL
I.I�
MANUAL
-- MANUAL
- -_
1
MANUAL
IQ
MANUAL
"1
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE
I r,l
J I B f i f f f# i i•
ff# -
CKS
�.•.,�137C15 05/20/85 28.23 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 500 -50 _ - MANUAL •
137015 05/20/85 13.37 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL j..i
13TC15 05720785 9:R9 AT'6 I TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62- -,------ - MANUAL -
,� 137015 05/20/E5 10.70 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 661 -66 MANUAL •
137C15 05/20/85 9000 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL
_ , I 137015 - -U5 -/20/8 14:64--- AT`B "T` `- - - '-TELEPHONE -50- 4256 - 841- 84- - - -- -- - MANUAL
> 85.03 a
i H I •
frf *f#
f -CKS --
„ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL
-', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
�z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- ,
•�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_
I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I
---CHECK-WO. -uA I L A
AROUN V
VENDOR I
ITEN DESCRIFTTCK -- A
ACCOUNT -N0: IliVo---W- P.O.- R'MESSAGE - - - - --
I1; 1
134451 0
06110/85 3
305.65 Q
QUALITY WINE 5
50 -4628- 822 -82 M
MANUAL T
T411 1
134451 - -
-- -06/10185 -
- 530:70" Q
QUALI -TT- VINE - -- - -
-50- 4628- 822- 82 - - -- - -
---- - MANUAL- ' -`- -
-134451 0
06/10/E5 5
562.55 Q
QUALITY PINE 5
50- 4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL l
la
134451 0
05/20/85 2
28.50 Q
QUALITY VINE I
INVENTORY 5
50- 4630- 822 -82 M
MANUAL ]
]'
i� -
-- X34451 f,5- 120It5 �
�57 ;OQ---- Q
QUAttTY -Wr-NE I
INVENTOR i
i0- 4.630- 862 -86 - - -
-- -MANUAL- I
•I� 6
69415.91
I�
i
134540 0
06/10185 4
4.58- T
TWIN CITY WINE 5
50- 3710- 822 -82 M
MANUAL I
I;
"L_- 1
134540 D
D6Y10/'85 -
- 4.80 = TWIN -CTTY -WINE- 5
50- 3710 - 86'2- 86- - - -
- - -- -- -MANUAL
` -
-J
134540 U
U6/10/85 2
229.11 T
TWIN CITY WINE 5
50 -4628- 822 -82 M
MANUAL
_ -
134540 0
06/10/85 3
3.60 T
TWIN CITY 41INE 5
50 -4628- 822 -82 M
MANUAL L
L�
C6/10n L
40.15 T
TWIN -
50- 4628- 862- 86�---- `
L
_ 1
134540 0
06/10/8 4
4.50 T
TWIN CITY WINE 5
50- 4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
467.98 # -
- -
-
-
-.I a
aaa -CKS
1
135354- u
u 5 120 IT . 3
319.03 M
MINNEGA"SCO 1
10=11 30= 000 -CC- -' -
-- -- MANUAL - - -
--
135354 0
05/20/85 4
474.15 M
MTNNEGASCO 4
4+EATING 1
10- 4254- 446 -44 M
MANUAL
05/20/85 7
767.56 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 1
10- 4254- 500 -50 M
MANUAL
135354- '057201F5 -
- 529.30 -
- miNNEGA-SCO -
- HEATING 1
10- 4254 - 520 -52 -
- - - -- --- MANUAL - -- 1
05/20/85 5
59373.13 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 1
10- 6254 - 540 -54 M
MANUAL
135354 0
05/20/85 3
31947 M
MTNNEGASCO H
HEATING 1
10- 4254- 629 -62 M
MANUAL
1
135 354 0
05/20185 -- 8
841.16 M
MI NNEGASCO°-` -
--HEATING 1
10- 4254- 646- 64--_._____. _
__.- MANUAL
135354 0
05/20/E5 1
131.55 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 2
23- 4254- 611 -61 M
MANUAL
135354 0
05/20/85 8
81989 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 2
27- 4254 - 662 -66 M
MANUAL �
�.
!;I 1
135354 0
05720-/8 3
38009:20 M
MINNEGASCO- -
- HEATING 2
28 -4254- 708 -70 -- -
- -- MANUAL
, 1
135354 0
05/20/85 1
117.47 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 4
40- 4254 - 801 -80 M
MANUAL •
•
-, -
135354 0
05/20/E5 1
1361.14 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 4
40- 4254- 803 -80 P
PARUAL
135354 0
05120/85 -
--74 ;64 -
- MINNEGASCO- H
HEATING'----50-4254-821-E2 -
- MANUAL -
�'•, 1
135354 0
05/20/85 5
51.76 N
NTNNEGASCO H
HEATING 5
50- 4254- 841 -84 M
MANUAL •
•
135354 0
05/20/85 1
102.54 M
MINNEGASCO H
HEATING 5
50 -4254- 861 -86 M
MANUAL
13-927 . 99 -
- -- - -
- -- -
- - - - - - -- -
CKS
�.•.,�137C15 05/20/85 28.23 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 500 -50 _ - MANUAL •
137015 05/20/85 13.37 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL j..i
13TC15 05720785 9:R9 AT'6 I TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62- -,------ - MANUAL -
,� 137015 05/20/E5 10.70 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 661 -66 MANUAL •
137C15 05/20/85 9000 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL
_ , I 137015 - -U5 -/20/8 14:64--- AT`B "T` `- - - '-TELEPHONE -50- 4256 - 841- 84- - - -- -- - MANUAL
> 85.03 a
i H I •
frf *f#
f -CKS --
„ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL
-', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
�z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- ,
•�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_
I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I
„ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL
-', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
�z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL
137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- ,
•�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_
I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I
v 1985 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 9
i
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 10
�Iz�
- CHECK -19
MDU
£NO 'OR—
TEM- DES-CRIPTION
- ACCDVNT- NO: -INYiF `0 -P.Oj
A" MESSAGE - --
• ++-CKS
I.
�<
_7- 1411915 06104785 --
`59397:13
` GROUP- IiEAC7H-
LMP- HKIISF -G
10- 4504 - 100 -10
MANUAL -
16.00 +
5,397.13
i.
:arr +a
aaa -CKS
148055 -- 03104185 -
255:78
— BRAEMAR -GOLF-
-PETTY_CASH
- - -Z7- 4120 - 663 -66 --
- -rare
--
300. ?0
-
-- r•r -CKS..
27- 4120- 664 -66
PANUAL
J
141430 0.6/04/85
189917.42
STATE TREASURER
ENP CONT FERA
10 -4145- 510 -51
MANUAL
�.I.
30:00
- -- - - 1 Bs917�b7�
PETTY -CASK
—27 -4200- 660 -EE
- - -
-- - -- - -
-
`I
`,j
aarrar
--
MANUAL
I„
r*r –CKS
I,,
1 141442 06/04185
✓�,
129542.67
PHP
EMP HOSP FHP
10- 4156 - 510 -51
-- -- -- . —._.
MANUAL
,
I --- - - - - --
12954207 a
r+r -CKS
14812
29862:85'
:7
arrrra
50- 4626- 822 -82 -----------
-
�• -I
-----
- - - - --
+ ++ -CKS
-_
•
I'r
:� -1 -41 ruu 05704185
29000:10-- `FOSTAAI5
TER
POSTAGE-
y0- 4240= ST0 =51 -------
PANUAL -
- -�^•
BELLBOY
29000.00
MANUAL
F_
._ --
.148129- Ob710711,
3.197.40-
'BELLBOY -`-'_
-- -�iwiw
7I
139987.90 +
w
lie,
aar –CKS
-- _
—1z,
144404 06/C4185
29616.40
NORTH A'MERIICAN
EMP LIFE INS
10- 4157 - 510 -51
MANUAL
613.
148135 06/10185
4.89-
- -
- -�;'
!27
arrrar
• ++-CKS
-�
144772 06/04/85
16.00
MET MUNICIPALITIES
RESERYATICN
10- 4504 - 100 -10
MANUAL -
16.00 +
i.
:arr +a
aaa -CKS
148055 -- 03104185 -
255:78
— BRAEMAR -GOLF-
-PETTY_CASH
- - -Z7- 4120 - 663 -66 --
-` "" MANUAL
148055 06/04/85
300. ?0
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CAS1+
27- 4120- 664 -66
PANUAL
;,,L148055
06/04/85
120.00
BRAEMAR' ]GOLF
PETTY CASH
27- 4120 - 666 -66
MANUAL
1480.55 -- 067047
30:00
BRAEMA"OLF -
PETTY -CASK
—27 -4200- 660 -EE
-- MANUAL
,148055 06/04/85
38.43
BRAEMAR GOLF
PETTY CASH
27- 4620- 661 -66
MANUAL
I„
744.21 +
r+r -CKS
14812
29862:85'
- BELLBOY —'-
50- 4626- 822 -82 -----------
- MANUAL-- -
�• -I
148129 06/10/85
29694.95
BELL30Y
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
ns!
148129 06/10/85
59232.70
BELLBOY
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
F_
._ --
.148129- Ob710711,
3.197.40-
'BELLBOY -`-'_
7I
139987.90 +
lie,
sr +ra a
+ +++CKS '
148135 06/10185
4.89-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
--
148135- D671Q78S-
244:65 -EA- GEE -VIN
50- 4628 - 842=84---
------- MANUAL -
?•Isri
239.76 +
�rrr
■r* -CKS —•
~Ise
148138 Ub/10 /85
38.32 -"
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL ,;;.�
1985 C,
. OF EDINA
CHECK K_ .STER
G5 -31 -85 . -AGE 11
.. ,
- CHECK-11 "-G "XT
148138 06/10/85
AMOUNT
6.56-
ENDO TEM-DES-CRIPYION
ED PHILLIPS
ACCOUNT -N0. INU:
50- 3710- 822 -82
#-P.O.-- -#-- MESSAGE-- ----
MANUAL
- -,,
!-
n
-'- 1481 ]8--
`U6 /10 /i'S
-- `9.98
ED'- PHILLIPS` - --
50- 3710 - 822- 82-----
- - -- -- MANUAL
ry
148138
06/10/85
6.50-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
148138
L•.6/10/E5
29.19-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
,MANUAL
461-38
U 6-f10-t8 5
04.08 ---ED-
PHILLIPS
0- 3710 - -842 -84
- MANUAL ---
-I
148138
06/10/585
11.99-
ED'PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
"I
14813E
C6/10/•E5
9.24-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
f,?
- - - -- 148138-
-- 06/10185-
---- 13.10----
ED-PHILLIPS
-50- 3710 - 862 -86-
_- _. - - -- -_MANUAL-
148138
U6/10/E5
50.01-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
.. z
148138
U6/10/85
5.84-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
„�
148138 06/10/89
1 - 016.22
FtJ- PHILLIP
-50- 4626 - 822 -82
----- MANUAL
- --
148138
06/10/85
59204.12
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
�,i
„
148138
-- 148138 --"
06/10/85
C'6-/1O/T5
2,500.70
325:n0E0-
ED PHILLIPS
'PHILLIPS -
50- 4626- 862 -86
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
--
'
148138
06/10/85
499.20
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 822 -82
PANUAL
yl„
148138
U6/10/85
328 U
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
_._1481 38 06110185
61:60
- EO- PHILLIP
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- -- MANUAL---
-
14813E
06/10185
19459.45
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -E4
MANUAL
148138
06/10/E5
59905
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�+
38 -'`
06/10/85
292.00 "
- -EO- PHILLIPS
_50- 4628- 862 -86
- - --- °- MANUAL "
10•,.1481
06/10/85
654.95
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
�,.
ar148138
139955.98 +
999999
rrr —CKS
�I-
z
�-
148190---
D6 /10YE5
`28:40=
-- GRIGGS""COOPER- AND C---
50 -3710- 822- 82 - -
- - -- - - MANUAL
148190
06/10/85
87.57-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50 -3710- 842 -E4
MANUAL
-
�,
148190
C6/10/E5
55.56-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1481 90 X6/10/85
j419�0-90,GRIGG
-S- COOPER -AND-
50- 4626- 822- 82--
--- --- --- "- MANUAL
-
148190
148190
06/10/85
06/10/85
49378950
29779.06
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50 -4626- 842 -84
50 -4626- 862 -E6
MANUAL
MANUAL'
r +r +rr
***—CKS
148271
06/10/85
7.50-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
148271
06/10/85
7087-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
-
- --`148271-
06/10/85
, -9C.83-
INTERCONTINENTAL-PK-
50 -3710- 842- E4- -
- - - -- - - MANUAL,
..I.
148271
06/10/E5
1.55-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
148271
06/10/85
8.17-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
i
-,7 7
148271 - 06/10/15
1 :50- -- ilTERCONTINEN-TA� PK
"50- 4626- 822 -82
-
--- - MANUAL -
�., �
148271
06/10/15
375.01
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
148271
06/10/85
4,541.57
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
-
"148271 -
-'- 06/10/85
2400-
TNTEICONTINENTAL'PK--
50- 4626- 842- 84----
-- - --- -- -- MANUAL
„
148271
06/10/85
408.60
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
148271
06/10/E5
1.50
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
148211-
06/10/85
-400 — INTERCONTINENTAL -PK—
50- 4628- 842 -84
-------- MANUAL
- -'
148271
06/10185
393.75
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
148271
06/10/85
77.95
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
146271--
-06 /f4 /E5
'73.75
INTER'PKG - INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
- ---- -- - -MANUAL
-'
148271
06/04/85
147.49
INTER AKG INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822 -82
MANUAL
X14
59934.30 +
.f g,. srrrrr
+a+ -CKS
- - 148285 "`
-`Q 6710ff5"
VORNS-ON-HIITL
50= 3- 710=842 -84 1
-- - -" MANUAL -°
is
1985 CITY OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 12
MANUAL I;
- -._ --- MANUAL —
MANUAL •
MANUAL of
MANUAL -
MANUAL •
MANUAL
-- MANUAL- .._ —'-
--- rr.- CKS --._'
MANUAL "
— — MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL a
MANUAL -
MANUAL _" •
MANUAL
+*+ -CKS
MANUAL
F-CHECK-NO;-UA-TENOUNT—
MANUAL
LIEN uE5CRIFTT0N`------ACCOIUNl -NO: IKV: -".O.
,148285
MANUAL
06/10185
5.93-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
-:
— 148285---
Ob /10 /8
-2.05-
JOHNSON -WINE
50-3710-w862-86--
148285
06%10,/85
3.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
148285
(16/10/85
700.90
JOMNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
7-j---
149285 06710/E5
3. O"TNE --
50- 4628- 842 -84 ---
_ie�
148285
06/10/85
296.79
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
I,
148285
06/10/85
.60
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
7
148285 - --
X6/10 /85
-- 102.90jOmNSO�
NIIVE`—" - ---
-- -50 -4628- 862- 86 - - --
- ,�
- --" MANUAL
1 9086.10 +
MANUAL
MANUAL - --
MANUAL
-.I e
148435
06/10/•85
2.15-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 822 -82
- 148435
C6/10785 —
- 3.77-
PRIOR - VINE- CO- _ - - - "'—
50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - -"
148435
06/10/85
.43-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 862 -86
148435
06/04/85
17023
PRIOR WINE
INVENTORY 50- 4628- 822 -82
-
- 148435
0-6/1078
07.40-
PRIOR- WINE -CO
50- 4628 - 822 -82
148435
06/10/85
168.50
PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 842 -84
148435
06/10/85
21.30
PRIOR LINE CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
j
148451
(16/10/65
4.89-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
148451
06/10/85
8.28-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
14845T
06/10/85`
—' "" ;73-
QUALITY -WINE -
- 50- 3710 - 822- 82 - - -`
148451
06 /10M
.05
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
J�_,I
148451
Q6/10 /85
.05
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
3,7-114
,
— 14845'1 -
8 4 5
0-7 8-
X671078"
27:82-
9UALITT WT NE
- -50 -3710- 822 -82 -
148451
06/10/85
28.27-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
148451
06/10/85
76.65-
QUALITY MINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
j -_-
148451
(16/10/85
- - -" .11
QUALITY - WINE-- '
- - - "— 50 -3710- 842 -84 -- - --
148451
06/10/85
1.17-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
148451
06/10185
5.49-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
-r-
148451 ZT6 -710%`8 )
:10-
OUALITa -WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
-
'
148451
06/10/15
5.7'8-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
148451
06/10/85
11.51-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
-
--148451---
`- C6/10/85
- 13.21=
0 UAL ITT °WINE-- ' - - - --
---50- 3710- 862- 86 - - ---
-
148451
06/10/85
36.72
QUALITY -WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
148451
06/10/85
1 9391.03
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
-
148451
06710785
5:67-
QUALITY -WINE`
50- 4626- 842- 84 - - - --
�•.I
148451
06/10/85
58.74
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
148451
06/10/85
39832.57
QUALITY LINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
148451-
06/10.785
- 660 �84
-QUALITY -WINE—
50- 4626- 862 -86 - -- - -- --
`j'j_.---148451
06/10/85
2.99-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
148451
C6/10/85
414.35
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
•=
148451-
06-/1078 5
2.57 — --
iiUALIT". IN
50 -4628- 822 -82 —
148451
06/10/85
244.55
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
148.451
06/10/85
19413.80
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
-- 148451 X6/10./85
355.15—
— QUALITY- ,4INE' - --
— 50- 4628- 842 -84" -
148451
06/10/85
274.80
QUALITY •MINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
148451
-14 "8431—
06/10/85
578.91
QUALITY 4INE
50- 4628- 862 -86
Gb7107F
89- ;2S-
QUAL'ITY -WIN
50 +4628 = 862 -86
149451
06/04/85
25.85
QUALITY WINE
INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86
99374.28 •
MANUAL I;
- -._ --- MANUAL —
MANUAL •
MANUAL of
MANUAL -
MANUAL •
MANUAL
-- MANUAL- .._ —'-
--- rr.- CKS --._'
MANUAL "
— — MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL a
MANUAL -
MANUAL _" •
MANUAL
+*+ -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL -
MANUAL
MANUAL
- -- MANUAL -
-:
MANUAL
MANUAL
- -" MANUAL -
MANUAL
MANUAL
— " - -- MANUAL - -"
MANUAL
MANUAL
- - - - - - -- MANUAL" --
MANUAL
MANUAL
- - -� MANUAL " --
MANUAL
G
MANUAL
- ..- MANUAL
-
MANUAL
MANUAL
r
-- — MANUAL -
MANUAL
?
MANUAL
C I
- --" MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL - --
MANUAL
-.I e
l�n
1985 L_ OF EDINA
CHECK n _STER
05 -31 -8S
AGE 13
far —CKS
.
149067
VENOUK TEM-OESCRIPT20N—
ACCOUNT-NO:-INV.-#-P.O:-'A-
MESSAGE- - - - ---
CHEC"O. OAT
AMOUN I
ICI
149067
06%10/85
1.80
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL -
-- 149067-
06110185-
-I,I
CAPITAL`CITr- DISTRI
14854U 06110/85
1.30-
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
�,I
DISTRI
148540 u6 /10/85
:9B
TWIN - CITY -�IiNE
0- 4628 - 842 -84 - --
MANUAL ----j
.I
DISTRI
148540 06/10/85
65.34
TWIN CITY MINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�I�
-504628- 862 -86
- -- -- MANUAL -
64.94
1 9201 .12 •
-
f.aarf
fff -CKS
'
;-
148581 96/10/85
� —__.
— VINIT -ALIA --
50- 4628 - 822 -82 - - - -
-- -MANUAL --I
70:1-0
--- ----- -- rr>.CKS
148581 0.6/10/85
1912000
VINITALIA
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
!I
` 149129
148581 06/10/85
33.00
VINITALIA
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
_L
,�l
�- 149129 0./10185
7g067-.�708ELL4-OY-
1323:10
- -- - --
-.. - --
l�n
siasaa
far —CKS
.
149067
06'/10/85
73900
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
149067
06%10/85
1.80
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL -
-- 149067-
06110185-
-`- 979.88°
CAPITAL`CITr- DISTRI
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- - -- - -- MANUAL -'
149067
06/10/85
13.50
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-, 149067
C6 /10 /F`.
2.70
CAFITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-149067-----0
61107"
130 247
-- CAP2'TA- -Ci'T"ISTR
-504628- 862 -86
- -- -- MANUAL -
5I
4�1
1 9201 .12 •
,__:..__._iaaaaa-
� —__.
�
_
-- --- --- - -•- --
--- ----- -- rr>.CKS
` 149129
06/10/85
29917.50
EELLBOY
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANLAL
�- 149129 0./10185
7g067-.�708ELL4-OY-
50- 4626- 862 -86-
- - - -- MANUAL -
99985.20
II
CKS -
'
149135
06/10/85
2921-
EAGLE MINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
49135
1 6:97 --
EAGLE -WIA°
50- 3710- 842 -84
- - - - -- MANUAL -'
1 ^� 149135
06/10/85
18.26-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149135
06/10/85
110041
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL -
-. -- 149135--
- 06/101F5
'848.27-
EAGLE -VINE-
50- 4628- 842- 84- -
- -- -- MANUAL`
149135
06/10/85
913.07
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
19834.31 a
I..I ufafa
aaa -CKS
_'- 14v138 --
'- O6 /10 /'t5
- 69�70�--
EO'PIfiILLihS -'
`-
- 50 -3710- 822- 82----
---------- - MANUAL -
�„ 14V139
U6/10/85
6.14-
ED P,HILLIPIS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
149138
06/10/85
9.18-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANLAL
X149138 -
06110985
3:18+- EO-PHICLIP
',0- 3710 - 822 -82
---- -MANUAL --
I.! 149138
06/10/.85
2.82
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
149138
06/10/85
21.36-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
- -- 149138 -
0/10/85
6
6.48 - EO- PHILLIPS
-50- 3710 - 842 -84
- - MANUAL
149138
06/10/85
13.09-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149138
06/10/85
9.50-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
„T- 1491'38- -06/10!85
VNIt -
EO- PRILtI S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL- i, •++
149138
06/10/85
12.49-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
i�,1 - 149138 _
06/10/85
13.34 -
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
�,
MANUAL I-
! -- -- --
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER C5 -31 -85 PAGE 14
v I
fIT^- CHECK- NOTATE-
Z
AMOUNT—
D-O ITEM- DES-CRIPTIVNI
ACCOUNT- NO.NY: A- P:O.'-A "MESSAGE- - - --
,1
149138
06/10/85
10.75•
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
-. 149138"---06110/E5-
3 -9484:95-
E0 "- PRILLI ?S "- -
50- 4626= 822 -82
- " - -- - MANUAL - - --
-
.
, 149138
0.6/10/85
475.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
0 149138
06/10/85
654.•65
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 842 -84
'MANLAL
7j
49138
06/10/!5
3gE54:20 - - -EO-- PHILLIPS -`-
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL-
n 149138
149138
06/10/85
Q6/10/85
189.10
4590D
ED PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628- 822
MANUAL
j
•
14V138- `06/10/85
-30600--
EO-PHILL-IPS -
-82
-50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
- -- MANUAL-- " - " -';
i
149138
06/10185
190679B0
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
PANUAL
_
149138
06/10/85
141.00-
ED PHILLIPS
5C- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�•,-
149138- 96%10/85
32400
ED-PHILLIP
50- 4628- 842 -84
-- --MANUAL
149138
06/10/85
667.15
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149138
06110/85
624.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
i.,.
149138 --
06/10/85 -
-- 537.25 -
ED- PHILLIPS -
50- 4628 - 862- 86- •- --
`- --- - - ---- --MANUAL " - '- -
12 9253.43
j 149190
06/10/85
19.31-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
'
1491 90'
06/10 /85-
" -61 .19=
GRIGGS - COOPER AND-C-
50- 3710- 842- 84-- ----
- - -- - -- MANUAL - -
149190
06/10/85
153.62-
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
'
149190
06/10/85
965.30
CRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
— 14919? 06/10785
-� 149190 06/10/85
3 059:25
7,680.82
BRIGGS- COOPER -AND "C
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626- 842 -84
50
VANUAL -" - -'
119471.25 #
-4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
149271 Cb7107E5—
- 4:52 = iNTERCONTINENTAI PK-
50 -3710- 822 -82
l -- " - PANUAL
149271
~!
06/10/85
4.52-
TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
•
I
149271
" --
06/10/85
4.52
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
149271
06/10/85
57.54-
INTERCONTINENTAL -PK`-
50 -3710- 822 -82"
- -- ` -' MANUAL
vn
149271
06/10185
60.25-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
;•
�-
149271
06/10185
15.99-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANLAL
149271
06710 -/85
120 .21-
INTERCONTINENTAL-PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
- -- - MANUAL -
���
149271
06/10185
2.03-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
"I 149271
a
06110/85
26.13-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149271
"06/10/85
-1.50-
TNTERCONTINENTAL-PK-
—50- 4626- 822 -82
o�,
149271
06/10/85
225965-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
a
,2149271
06/10/85
1.50-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 822 -E2
MANUAL
14927
07Z' 5
z25-065-------IRTERCONTTNENTAL-PK
50- 4626- 822 -82-
'- -- - -- MANUAL -
•'a
149271
06/10/85
1.50
TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
e
i
149271
06/10/85
226.25
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANLAL
«.'
-- 149271
U6 /10TE
9'877:13-
'INTERCONTINENTAL' -PK
50- 4626 - 822 -82 "�""'
"-- "-- _ - " --- MANUr"L -
T +�
149271
06/10/85
14.70
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 822 -82
PANLAL
149271
06/10/85
39012.85
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
149271 - -D- 6710785
16:50 INTER- CONTINENTAL PK
50- 4626- 842 -8
MANUAL - " "- -"
149271
06/101f!
6,010.79
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
a
l„
149271
-
0.6/10/85
29.70
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
149271
- 06
NTERCONTINENTAL-PK
50- 4628 - 842 =84 - --
MANUAL"
-� +-
149271
06/10/85
3.90
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
j e
149271
06/10185
101975
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4628 - 862 -86
PANUAL
-,-
149271'II671078
.bO--
INTETC -ON 71NENTAL P K
50 -4628- 862 -86
PANUAL
J,,
149271
06/10/85
8.40-
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
IT.ia
149271
06/10185
19306.60
INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
,
q.
1 1985 . OF EDINA CHECK . STER 05 -31 -8- AGE 15
f_
�CHEC"Oo OXTE
AROUNI
VENDOR
ITE-ESCRIP -rION y1CCOUNT- NO —INY-.-- *-P.O.-#-MESSAGE
-T;,
=
3
149433
'
14v123.90 •
50 -4628- 822 -82
120.12
'�'
149433
06/10/85
2.55
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 822 -82
:•j-- 149433 06110/85
61]8:40-- AUSrIS-3-S ON s
50- 4628 - 862 -86-
149433
06/10,/85
10.50-
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
+rr -CKS
le
'
10.50
PAUSTIS 6 SONS
149285 078110-/85
OHNS-ON -UTN
50 - 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL-- -11I
-,
--7-.-29-
„
149433
49 285
06/10/85
7.29-
JO -MNSON WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
ale'
19
608940-
149285
06/10/85
8.46-
JOHNSON WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL _
— 149285
-06110/25
— 14.,73■-
-- JO14NSON-WIME - - ---
- 50- 3710 - 842 -84
-- -- MANUAL - - - -i ,
�.,
149435
149285
06/10/85
8.46-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
0.6/10/85
4.94-
PRIOR WINE CO
149285
06/10/85
4.34-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANLAL
�^,)
149435
06/10/85
149285 06/10185
6:67-
JOHNSON -LINE
-50- 3710- 862 -86
----- MANUAL - --
06/10/8`.
149285
06/10/85
11.28-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
`
149285
06/10/85
423.45
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
_
MANUAL
L
1 49 285 ---
0 6/10 /85
1
J OHNSON- iINE- -'
50- 4626 - 822 -82—
-- -._. MANLAL---- � .
149285
06/10/85
364.96
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
x6/10/85
149295
06'/10/8
6.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANLAL
--
149285- 06110/85
364;2-3
wlOHNS-O"T-NE
50 -4628- 822 -82
- - - -- MANUAL --
149285
0.6/10/85
4.50
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
149285
06'/10/85
2.70
6OHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
149285'
06110/65
-736.85 -"--
JO*1NSON-liINE —`
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- -- MANUAL -`
149285
06/10/85
217.15
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
149285
06/10/85
12.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
149285— 06110/85
42332
JOHNSON -WI'VE
5 ^- 4628- 842 -84
- MANUAL- --
149285
06/10/85
2.10
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
`i --
149285
06/10/85
13.80,
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
-.i '-
149285-
06710 /85
833,52
- "JOHNSON VINE
'— - 50- 4628- 862 -86 - ---
- MANUAL
149285
06/10/85
564.01
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANLAL _
149285
06/10/85
6.30
--899 -ti
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
_- MANUAL
I
149433
06'/10/85
50 -4628- 822 -82
120.12
PAUSTIS 9 SONS
149433
06/10/85
2.55
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 822 -82
:•j-- 149433 06110/85
61]8:40-- AUSrIS-3-S ON s
50- 4628 - 862 -86-
149433
06/10,/85
10.50-
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
149433
06'/10/85
10.50
PAUSTIS 6 SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
` - 149433---
06/10/E5
- 60'8.40--
PAUSTIS - -6 -SONS— -'
50 -4628- 862 -86-
„
149433
06/10/85
10.50
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
149433
06/10/85
608940-
PAUSTIS 8 SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
1'j
741;59
tartar
�._
149435
06/10/85
7009-
PRIOR WINE CO
149435
0.6/10/85
4.94-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710- 842 -84
�--T-
149435 0-6/10/1 5
2.91
PRIOR-VINE-CO,
50- 3710 - 862 -86-
�^,)
149435
06/10/85
354.68
PRIOR ALINE CO
50 -4628- 822 -82
�.
149435
06/10/8`.
246.80
PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 842 -84
'14943 5
06/10/85
145o50—
PRIOR-VINE-CO
50- 4628 - 862 -86-
�„
732,04 •
sa
]9
35
149451
x6/10/85
7.79-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
4w
r** -CKS
MANLAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANLAL -
MANUAL
MANLAL
* * * -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL-
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL-
MANUAL
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 16
MANUAL
MANUAL -
MANUAL iR
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
+•+ -CKS ,T
• -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ;
a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m
+a +raa *++ -CKS
I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - -
18.941.00 +
fl'1� -- -
ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51
I,.d ,uaaa+
155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , ,
,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82
MANUAL
CHECK -N O.
DAIL
ANDUNI
11E-"ES-CR7PTTGIN—ACCoUNT--NO. INV---- f1-P--0: S--
MESSAGE
149540 06/10/85
11.19-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
149 5 4U------0-671 0"5—
6:72 -
�
50 -3710- 862 -86
149451
06/10/85
7.54-
QUALITY VINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
'
149540 06/10/85
149451
- 06/10/85
— "- 18.00=
QUALITY- WINE -'
S0- 3710 - 822 -E2-
-- MANUAL --
- -6.30
-�
-- -50 -4628- 862 -86 -- -, - --
149451
06/10/85
21.72-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
FANUAL
�,
149451
06/10/85
.26
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
'MANUAL
I-
'
_'151174---------O67/C4'/8
149451frb /10185
3:49—
— �UALiTY- 1tINE-
�� 50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUaL-
_I--
nf
149451
06/10/85
5.52-
QUALITY WINE
`� 50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
c
1
149451
06/101P5
29.83-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
I "I-
149451
- 06-/10/85
- 12.39=-- -9UALIT1r -- WINE --' -
-" ---50 -3710- 862 -86 —` --
--MANUAL -
I
149451
06/10/85
.66-
QUALITY VINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANLAL
1
_-
149451
06/10/85
81.13-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862.86
MANUAL
149451
06/10/85
- -8.97-
OUALITT- "WINE
50- 3710- 862 =86 - - --
MANUAL
; -1
_'•-�
149451
06/10/85
945.25
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
ri
149451
- -_
06/10/85
1.086.01
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MAN UAL
I�
149451
C6 /1018 5-
- -33.40
GUALITT'WINE - - --
50- 4626- 862 -86 "` - --
-' MANUAL
r1 l
149451
06/10/85
4.056.37
QUALITY WINE
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
149451
- --
06/10485
389.60
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
_ C
149457--
�U6/1078
377 :44 -
0UACITY-11INE
50= 4628 = 822 -82
MANUAL
149451
06/10/85
674.61
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
i
149451
06/101115
1.491.58
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
149451
6/10/85_
276.24+'
QUALITY'WINE-
50- 4628 - 842 =84 ---- - -..
-_ MANUAL - --
`'
-�•�
149451
06/10/85
13.40-
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
.•t�
149451
06/10185
619.82
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
'- 14945;
001Ic- 185'
-- 448 -:57
-QUAILIIV WINE-
0- 4628=862 -86 - - - ----
MANUAL
10.178.31 +
MANUAL
MANUAL -
MANUAL iR
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
+•+ -CKS ,T
• -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ;
a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m
+a +raa *++ -CKS
I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - -
18.941.00 +
fl'1� -- -
ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51
I,.d ,uaaa+
155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , ,
,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82
MANUAL
If
— +ra -CKS
MANUAL
149540 06/10/85
11.19-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
149 5 4U------0-671 0"5—
6:72 -
TWIN -CI`TT -WINE-
50 -3710- 862 -86
si•,�
149540 U6/10/85
559.58
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
149540 06/10/85
8.40
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
149540 C- 6/10T85
- -6.30
TWIN- CITY - WINE - --
-- -50 -4628- 862 -86 -- -, - --
149540 06/10/85
336920
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
892.57 +
- �
aataaa
_'151174---------O67/C4'/8
5
"in - 00n - -nn
1 ST- ---- -
—
MANUAL
MANUAL -
MANUAL iR
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
+•+ -CKS ,T
• -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ;
a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m
+a +raa *++ -CKS
I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - -
18.941.00 +
fl'1� -- -
ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51
I,.d ,uaaa+
155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , ,
,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82
MANUAL
If
— +ra -CKS
MANUAL
;G
a +a -CKS
MANUAL
Y
-.
1985 L OF EOINA
CHECK , -STER
05 -31 -8. AGE 17
_ (,-
-
,-
CHECK -n0: DA•T
155067 06/10/85
°- - 155067`- "C6/10>85
115C67 06/10/85
155067 06/10/85
155129 06/10/E5
-
A MOUN I
298.40
-5:85
11925
874.49
3,221.25
39221.25 r
VENDOR -TEM-OESCitIP-1-ION
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL-CITY- DISTRT --
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
EELLBOY
ACCOUNT--NO.-INW.-- A--P.O-i- #-
50- 4628- 842 -84
5C- 4628- 842 -84 --
50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4626- 842 -84
MESSAGE--- ---[,,
MANUAL
---- PANU.AL- -------
i ?,
MANUAL
MANUAL
rrr -CKS r„
MANUAL I1
�, .i 4rrrlr
`
--
- - ---* ++-CKS
- 155135--
C6 /10 /ES
— "3.97-
EAGLE"-NINE - -"
50- 3710 - 822 -82— ----
MANUtL'—
155135
06/10/E5
14.35-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
PANLAL
L- 155135
06/10185
17.68-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
155135-- D.6/10/85
98:53
- EAGLE -WIN
50- 4628- 822 -82 -
-- MANUAL - --
155135
C6 /10 /E5
717.59
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
155135
06/10/85
'884.13
EAGLE arNE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
I_ :,� -� - -- ---- - - - -
--
� 764:2 5 -� --
—_ —_ _
_--- - - - - -- -
- -- - - - -- - - -:....
"� rrrr►r
CKS i .1
155138
06/10/ES
402-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
-- 155138
06/10/E5
3.48-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
-� 15 513 8
06/10/85-
-- 82:13-
ED- PHILLIPS " --" - - -'--
-- 50 -3710- 842 -84 - -
-- MANUAL -
I,� 155138
06/10/E5
13.74-
ED PHILLIPS
5C- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL .
155138
06/10185
7.31-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL j
;; -- 155138
C6710/E5
6.39-
ED- PFIIL"LIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
-- MANUAL - - -,
155138
U.6/10/85
20.40-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
-I -, 155138
U6/10/E5
16.23-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL '
15513E
u6/101E5
11.5 ILLIPS -- — --50-3710-862-86
4,106.26 ED PHILLIPS
- ----"- '- --"-
50- 4626- 842 -84
-MANUAL
PANUAL
155138
U611GY85
205.75
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
!„ 155138-
6110f85
1'73:90 -ED-
PHILLIPS -
50- 4628- 822 -82 - --
-MANUAL -
I,, 15513E
/155138
U6/10/85
365.60
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�1551 38—`-U6110/85
06/10/85
686.90
020.00-
ED PHILLIPS
ED_PHILLIPS -
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628- 862- 86--- - - - - -
MANUAL
-- MANUAL
155138
T
06/10/85
578.95
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
PANLAL
15513E
06/10/E5
811.65
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL '
i;_; — "15
-319:-46---
ED-PHIttIPS
-50- 4628- 862 -86 -
MANUAL --
�••�
8,103.D9 r
155190
C6/10/E5
70.69-
GRIGGS CCOPER AND C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1551 9[ — 06710785
26 -.58—
GR- IGGS- COOPER--AND-C
50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- --
MANUAL
155190.
06/10/85
3,534.52
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
15519Q
06/10185
1,329.10
GRIGGS COOPER AND C
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
4 176 6:34 -+
--
_.I rrrrrr
155271 06/10/85
155271 06/10/85
3.75 INTERCONTINENTAL PK
2.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710 - 842 -84
t�
+ ++ -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL 0
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 18
1. 1
CHECK- NO: -DAT
4OUN
EN011R—
ITEM- TER
' ACCOUNT'NO-.-TNY-
O-P.O.- N- MESSAGE-
`1:'
155271
06/10/E5
4.09-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 842 -E4
MANUAL
1
I' `
5271 '----
06/10!85
55.45w
'INTERCONTTNENTAL'-PK_
50-3710-6842-84---
- MANUAL__-
_F
z
155271
06/10/85
5.05-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
I_-
155271
06/10/85
-/85
29772..72
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
.MANLAL
��`
155271
06- 110
2.00
- INTERCONTINENTAL -PK-
50- 4626- 842 -84-
MANUAL----
-
.IOW
155271
06/10/85
1.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
155271
06/10/85
252.55
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
t
155271-'—
`U6/10/85
-- 2.10 — INTERCONTINENTAL'
"PK "`
'50- 4628- 822 -82
- - - 'MANL'AL - -"
- ; =•
155271
06/10/85
187.85
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
155271
06/10/8!
204.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
.'�155Z71
-- 06/10/85
104 ,35—
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
30 -4628= 842 -84
- MANUAL
155271
06/10/85
.90
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 842 -E4
MANUAL
JI,-I
-
155271
06/10/E5
1.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
-
1
-- -- -
I
�i „I
�,�
.frf.f
- - - - --
--
- - - - --
fff-
- - - - -- -CKS
I:-
155285
06/10/85
6.43-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -E4
MANUAL
155285
06/10/85
14.01-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
I !�
5285`L6/10/L5"
--- 23 :73�
JOHNS ON_W ? NE- —”
50- 3710 - 842- 84-
- - --"- MAKUAI
" -,
155285
U6/10/85
6.66-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
.
155285
06/10/E5
`061107E5
14.01-
JOHNSON WINE
-WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
I -�
5 2285—
3:91-
jCHNSON
50- 3710- 862 -E6
MANUAL"
'
155285
06/10/E5
700.90
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
,I
155285
06/10/85
300
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
Iry
hoI
"- 155285' 0671x/85 —
155295 ^6/10185
155295 06/10/E5
- -3.R0
700.90
23.70
JOHNSON °WINE" --
JOHNSON WINE
JOHNSON WINE
50-4626-862-86-----
50- 4626- 862-86
50- 4628- 842 -84
---- ' "- MAAIAI - -
MANUAL
MANLAL
--
t
111155285 ----a-
671078
-420—
JOHNSON -WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -E4
- -- -" MANUAL-- -
L1
155285
06/10/95
19196.91
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
l�
155285
-- --
06/10/E5
321.75
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
155285
06/10/85
`333:37
JOHNSON- LINE -
50- 4628- 862- 86 - - - -"
- - -- MANUAL
155285
06/10/85
3.30
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
I
s�
155285
U 6/10/85
195.79
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANLAL
r,
I»1
155285 L•b7101F
6.30
JOHNSON -BIN
50- 4628- 862 -86
----- MANUAL -- - --
._
�I
39414.37 r
-
I-,
f.. -CKS
155435 06/10/85
"--
4.30-
-3
PRIOR -WINE CO
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
�_ e
55435
D6 110CF
:4
PRIOR - VINE -00
50- 3710 - 842 -84
- - -- - -- MANUAL
"
155435
126/10/85
.43
PRIOR MINE CO
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
L,;!
155435
06/10/85
.43-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
- _
i«
._
155435
"06110%85
21 .48-
PRIOR- "47INr-00 " - - --
50 -4628- 842- E4
MANUAL
„
155435
06/10/85
21.48
FRIOR WINE CO
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
a„
155435
C6/10/85
214.80
PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 842 -E4
MANUAL
-'-
155103`— O -7 T078 5
2l_e4l8-______PRnK
Ml E7__CU
50=4628- 842=84
-MANUAL--
-
-•�
1E9.45
I
*.f -CKS
51
155451
06/10/85
8.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
5,--155451
--OS /10-78
. 1=--
NUACIT"r-N
50 -3710- 822""82
MANUAL--
�I»
155451
06/101.85
23.08-
CUALIT!T TINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
14
15. 5451
06/10125
14.94-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
'
a
• � r
1985 OF EDINA CHECK STER �O5 -31 -8 AGE 19
I
i
I
i
7.
7r
--
CHECK -NO. CATE
A OUN
VENDOR
- 7Eft -CESZ •-
RIPIION-- ACCOUNT-N0-IkY f-P
O.--*- MESSAGE
1
�,�
FUND 26 TOTAL
155451
06/10/85
13.99-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
'
GOLF- COURSE-FUNC—
Hand typed checks
-
155451
06/10/'85
-4:32=
QUALITY - VINE -- -
50- 3710 - 862 --86
- - MANUAL- - -
-;
q
75.61
155451
06/10/85
?6.40-
GUALIT,Y 6INE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANLAL
- -- - 21590.89 -
- FUND -44 -TOTAL
- G
155451
06/10/t5
27949-
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
,a
371
-155451
06/10/85
11154.39---
OUALITY-11TNE -
50- 4626- 842 -84
- - •MANUAL
�.
CHECK RC 11IS7 =R f'TCD
155451
155451
06/10/85
06/10/85
1.374.85
431.71
QUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
o
QUALITY NINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
"
I,
--
155451
-06/101??
- 445:55---
OUOLTTY- WINE ----
50- 4628- 822 -82
- MANUAL--
-
FINANCE DIRLCTOR
DATE
155451
06/10/85
747.13
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�-
155451
06/10/85
699.60
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
155451-
06/10-/85
1.820.02
QUALITY -SINE-
50- 4628- 862 -tE
- - MANUAI
155451
06/10/85
21605
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
IC
69751.54
1,-
aaaaaa
aa• -CKS
r,
155540 C, 61101E
0:09 ------
7—TWIN -CfTY -DINE
-50- 3710- 842-64
- --MAN A - --
i.
15554U
06/10185
9.93-
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
I,.
155540
06/10/85
8.40
TWIN CDTY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
_
Z
155540
ti6 /1C /85-
-504.73--- -1 WIN-CITT- WINE-
50- 4628- 842- 84--
- - - - -- MANUAL -'
d
155540
06/10/85
9.30
TWIN CITY WINE
56 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
i,,
155540
C6 /10M
496.73
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
--
999:14
-_I
17!
ta••aa
CKS
; -i_
-
`- '-196040.87
FUND- 10- TOTAL ---
GENERAL FL'AD --- -
- -- - - - - -- - - -
I
i
I
i
7.
7r
386.09
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
1
66.26
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
;-199;4
FUND-2-7-TOT-AL
GOLF- COURSE-FUNC—
Hand typed checks
li's 62157
2157
3 465.72
FUND 2? TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
thru 62178, 62184
thru
75.61
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
63259 thru 6338
--
- -- - 21590.89 -
- FUND -44 -TOTAL
--UTILITY—FUND------- - --
- -- - - -- .. ---------
--- -._ ._.
3049350.10
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
,a
371
5,15-g975-0-3-
CHECK RC 11IS7 =R f'TCD
- --
CITY MANAGER
DATE
n
�
FINANCE DIRLCTOR
DATE
,I
nl
I
i
I
i
7.
7r