Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-06-17_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 17, 1985 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of May 6 and May 20, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -5 West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive - II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading a. R -1 to PRD -3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road B. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Foster Green Addition C. Appeal from Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision - 4528 Bruce Avenue - Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS A. Insurance Renewals B. Van - Utility Department C. Administrative Vehicle D. Community Center Parking Lot - Sprinkler Modification V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 11, 1985 B. Request for CDBG Participation - Woodhaven C. Carson Gift of Land D. Homart Development of France Avenue Theatre Site - Bloomington E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Resolution Adopting a Program, and Giving Preliminary Approval to a Development and its Financing, Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C and Authorizing Submission of the Program to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for Review and Approval VII. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the.following claims dated 6/17/85: General Fund $408,244.05, Working Capital Fund $600.00, Park Fund $20.21, Art Center $2,351.78, Swimming Pool Fund $3,550.65, Golf Course Fund $53,944.50, Recreation Center Fund $5,344.33, Gun Range Fund $319.39, Water Fund $118.50, Utility Fund $221,189.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund $115,766.97, Construction Fund $49,214.73, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $207,675.00, Total $1,068,339.25; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 5/31/85: General Fund $196,840.87, Art Center $386.09, Swimming Pool Fund $66.26, Golf Course Fund $8,199.49, Recreation Center Fund $3,465.72, Gun Range Fund $75.61, Utility Fund $2,590.89, Liquor Dispensary Fund $304,350.10, Total $515,975.03 (MEETINGS SCHEDULE - REVERSE SIDE) SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Monday June 17 Special Council Meeting - Update of 5:00 p.m. Mgr. Conf. Rm. Strategic Plan Monday June 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Monday June 24 Edina Nite at Minnesota Twins Game Metrodome (Buses leave lower parking lot at Braemar at 5:00 p.m:) Thurs June 27 Ralph Lieber Roast 5 -7 p.m. Interlachen C. Club ? Monday July 1 Special Council Meeting - Update of 5:00 p.m. Mgr. Conf. Rm. Capital Plan Monday July 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Sat July 13 EDINAMITE 9:00 a.m to 4:00 p.m. & 7:30 -11:00 p.m. Wooddale School Thurs July 4 Independence Day - City Hall Closed Monday July 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:OO p.m. Council Room AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 17, 1985 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of May 6 and May 20, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -5 * West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four - fifths (4 /5),favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four- fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading a. R -1 to PRD -3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road B. Preliminary Plat Approval * 1. Foster Green Addition C. Appeal from Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision - 4528 Bruce Avenue - * Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Insurance Renewals * B. Van - Utility Department * C. Administrative Vehicle * D. Community Center Parking Lot - Sprinkler Modification V. RECOMMENDATIONS.AND REPORTS A. Tr"affic.Safety Committee Minutes of June 11, 1985 * B. Request for CDBG Participation - Woodhaven C. Carson Gift of Land * D. Homart Development of France Avenue Theatre Site - Bloomington E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. Resolution Adopting a Program,. and Giving Preliminary Approval to a Development and its Financing, Under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C and Authorizing Submission of the Program.to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for Review and Approval VII. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the.following claims dated 6/17/85: General Fund $408,244.05, Working Capital Fund $600.00, Park Fund $20.21, Art Center $2,351.78, Swimming Pool Fund $3,550.65, Golf Course Fund $53,944.50, Recreation Center Fund $5,344.33, Gun Range Fund $319.39, Water Fund $118.50, Utility Fund $221,189.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund $115,766.97, Construction Fund $49,214.73, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $207,675.00, Total $1,068,339.25 (MEETINGS SCHEDULE - REVERSE SIDE) SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Monday June 17 Special Council Meeting - Update of 5:00 p.m. Mgr. Conf. Rm. Strategic Plan .Monday June 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Monday June 24 Edina Nite at Minnesota Twins Game Metrodome (Buses leave lower parking lot at Braemar at 5:00 p.m.) Thurs June 27 Ralph Lieber Roast 5 -7 p.m. Interlachen C. Club ? Monday July 1 Special Council Meeting - Update.of 5:00 p.m. Mgr. Conf. Rm. Capital Plan Monday July 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Sat July 13 EDINAMITE 9:00 a.m to 4:00 p.m. & 7:30 -11:00 p.m. Wooddale School Thurs July 4 Independence Day - City Hall Closed Monday July 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room ,J MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 6, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of.the.Regular Council Meetings of April 1 and April 15, 1985, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 2, STOW'S EDGEMOOR. Planner Craig Larsen presented a petition for division of Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor, generally located east of Lynmar Lane and north of Mavelle Drive. The applicants are re- questing a party -wall division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided.. A non - conforming three -car garage is located on the south- erly portion of the site. Mr. Larsen advised that the proposed split satisfies all conditions for a party -wall subdivision established in the Zoning Ordinance. However, since all the garages will be located on one lot, garage access easements will be needed. Staff would recommend approval of the division. No objection being heard, Member Bredesen-introduced the following resolution and.moved adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 1, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate . parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: The North 47.3 feet, front and rear of Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and Lot 6, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, except the North 47.3 feet, front and rear, of said Lot 6; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly, setting May 20, 1985, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) PRD -3 Plan Amendment - Klodt Construction Company - Generally located in the northwest quadrant of Cahill Road and W. 78th Street 2) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation /National Car Rental Systems - generally located.west of France Avenue and south of W. 76th Street 3) R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District, generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue 4) Appeal from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision - John Gabbert - 7010 France Avenue So. - Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R.O.W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor Addition Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEMS (METRO BLVD /70TH & METRO BLVD / EDINA INDUSTRIAL BLVD 485 -2 ENG). Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for two traffic control signal systems (Metro Blvd /70th Street and Metro Blvd /Edina Industrial Blvd) showing Ridgedale Electric at $137,190.00, Egan McKay Electrical Contractors, Inc. at $141,340.00, Killmer Electric Company, Inc. at $154,201.00 and Hoffman Electric at $154,662.75. Engineer Hoffman advised that the project.will be turned in for State Aid funding. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Ridgedale Electric, at $137,190.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 5/6/85 BIDS AWARDED FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (BA -263, P -14, P -15 AND VARIOUS PARK PROJECTS ( #85 -3 & 485 -4 ENG). Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Contract #85 -3 (Eng) - School Parking Lots, Arthur Street and W. 492 Street as follows: Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $138,607.68, Hardrives, Inc. at $151,466.35 and Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $154,998.78. Bids for Contract X685 -4 (Eng) - Arneson Park and Playground Rings were as follows: Gunderson Brothers at $34,366.00, Standard Sidewalk at $41,502.50, Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $42,618.80, Victor Carlson & Sons, Inc. at $46,395.70 and Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $57,796.50. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bids to recommended low bidders, Contract #85 -3 to Bury & Carlson, Inc. at $138,607.68 and Contract $85 -4 to Gunder- son Brothers at $34,366.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BIDS AWARDED FOR WEED HARVESTING OF MILL POND AND MIRROR LAKE. Mr. Rosland advised that there was only one bidder for weed harvesting of the Mill Pond and Mirror Lake and that Midwest Aqua Care has done a good job for the City the past several years. Bids submitted by Midwest Aqua Care were $9,120.00 for the Mill Pond and $4,930.00 for Mirror Lake. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of bids to Midwest Aqua Care at $9,120.00 /Mill Pond and $4,930.00 /Mirror Lake. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of.quotes for one 1984 Chevrolet Citation II, 4 -door hatchback showing Iten Chevrolet, Brooklyn Center at $8,194.00, Harold Chevrolet, Bloomington at $8,584.00 and Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet, Buick at $9,210.00. The vehicle will replace a Park & Recreation Depart- ment vehicle. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by.Member Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Iten Chevrolet at $8,194.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT RADIO BASE .STATION. Mr. Rosland advised that the main base radio was inoperable during and following lightning activity in the month of February and that replacement of the radio base station was included in the capital budget for Police /Fire Departments. Tabulations of bids showed General Communications, Inc. at $12,247.00 and Motorola Communications & Electronics, Inc. at $12,428.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, General Communications, Inc. at $12,247.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY INSURANCE /POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE. Mr. Rosland advised that as of May 24, 1985, Home Insurance intends to discontinue the Police Professional Insurance coverage currently covered under the City's General Liability Insurance. In an effort to find premiums that were reasonable for both the Police and the Public Officials Liability, it was necessary to quote both coverages together. The Markel Service was willing to write the Public Officials Liability as long as they could also write the Police Professional Liability. Other companies that were solicited to submit bids were not willing to write Public Officials Liability, or those who did quoted prices that were much higher. Because of the difficulty in acquiring the Public Officials Liability, staff is recommending that we award the bid for both coverages to Markel Service. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to Markel Service, Inc. at $6,600.00 for Public Officials Liability Insurance and at $15,150.00 for Police Professional Insurance. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED REQUESTING CHANGE OF USE TO OPEN SPACE FOR LOT 8, BLOCK 3, CROCKER & CROWELLS FIRST ADDITION. Mr. Rosland.recalled that at the meeting of April 15, 1985, the Council had held over the matter of the request for release of Lot 8, Block 3, Crocker & Crowells First Addition in response to the neighbors in the surrounding area who asked that it be retained for open space instead of returning it to the State of Minnesota to be placed of sale. This tax - forfeited parcel had been acquired originally by the Village of Morningside in 1943 for drainage purposes and is no longer needed for those purposes. Donald Giese, 4232 Oakdale Avenue So., stated he represented the concerned citizens surrounding the subject property. Mr. Giese presented a petition signed by approximately 178 persons requesting the Council to: 1) deny permission for any development of the property, and 2) to maintain the property as open space. Dr. Bert Stromberg, 4219 Oakdale Avenue So., made a brief graphic presentation to further emphasize their united concern that it be retained as open space. Following discussion, Attorney Erickson explained that the statute provides that if tax - forfeited land - that has been conveyed to a municipality for a specific purpose is no longer 5/6/85 being used for that purpose the State can take affirmative action to take the land back. The City can seek to change the purpose for which it was received by making application for approval of a new use of tax - forfeited lands and the State may or may.not approve it. Member Bredesen commented that he felt this parcel is dif- ferent from other undeveloped property because it is now publicly owned and that-..a request for change of use to open space would be a continuation of public ownership which is now in existence. Member Bredesen then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Village of Morning side (by annexation now City of Edina) on August 6, 1943, received a conveyance of tax forfeited lands from the State of Minnesota, conveying to it for drainage purposes a tract of land described as follows: Lot eight (8), Block three (3), Crocker and Crowell's First Addition to the Village of Morningside; and, WHEREAS, the above described property is no longer needed for drainage purposes but is desired by the City for open space purposes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that an application be made to the State of Minnesota, Department of Taxation, to change the use of the land above described from drainage purposes to open space purposes. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PLAN APPROVED FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY IMPROVEMENT OF CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY RAMP. Engineer Hoffman recalled that at the meeting of April 15, 1985, the Council had given concept approval of the Hennepin County's proposed plan for improvement of the eastbound ramp from T.H. 100 to Crosstown 62, with the contingency that the County provide additional safety information and options to the City Engineer to be brought back to the Council together with possible options for resolving the noise issue. Mr. Hoffman stated that he had met twice with County staff since then and that the County had agreed to construct a guard rail to protect the Murphy and Stang residences, which are the two homes adjacent to the ramp. Additionally, the County will purchase any City right of way, if needed, for construction of the improvement. Mr. Hoffman reiterated staff's recommendation that the Council should consider constructing a six foot privacy fence inside the guard rail along the Murphy and Stang homes. The County will.also construct the necessary cul -de -sacs on Parnell Avenue and West Shore Drive. Attorney Erickson advised that it may be necessary to exchange easements between the City and Hennepin County when actual ownership of the land on which the improvement is to be constructed is determined. There being no further discussion, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided plans and specifications for the improvement of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 and seeks the approval thereof; and WHEREAS, in connection with the proposed improvement Hennepin County has agreed to construct a guard rail adjacent to the Murphy and Stang homes; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to purchase from the City any right of way if needed for the proposed project and to provide $3,000 for use for City roadways; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans for the improvement of the ramp from northbound T.H. 100 to eastbound Crosstown Hwy. 62 be and are hereby approved, sub- ject to an exchange of easements between--the City--and Hennepin County as necessary. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. With regard to the noise issue that was raised by the neighbors in the surrounding area, Mr. Hoffman said that he had been in contact with the staff of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency as to their opinion on a sound barrier wall. The PCA staff commented that a sound barrier wall in that location would be effective only for the homes immediately adjacent to the wall and that the effect would be greatly diminished beyond the first three homes. They stated further that the .amount of traffic using the ramp is relatively small and has_little:­�impact,,.over the:_noise J rom the.Crosstown Highway traffic averaging 64,000 vehicles per day. Member Turner commented that the noise abatement issue is a long term issue that the Council should address, that the strategic plan is to protect the.residential nature of the community and the volume of traffic on the Crosstown Highway does impact the residential character of the community -and that..ultimately _ the__Council_.should express-that concern to the County, State or Federal authorities. No action was taken on the noise abatement issue. CDPC RESOLUTION REGARDING PROPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT OF FRANCE AVENUE THEATRE SITE IN BLOOMINGTON ENDORSED. Mr. Rosland advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission at a recent meeting had drafted a resolution with regard to the proposed Homar.t Development of the France Avenue Theatre site in Bloomington and its impact on the City of Edina. In..the resolution the Commission had recommended that all appropriate steps be taken to effect a reduction of the proposed development. 5/6/85 Mr. Rosland then presented total office square feet for the three basic office areas in Edina and in summary noted that the total square feet of office space in the City is approximately 4.2 million and that the proposed Homart Development is approximately 33% of the total office space in Edina. Staff would recommend that the Council pass the resolution on to the Bloomington City Council with a request that the respective Councils meet jointly at the earliest convenience to discuss the potential effects of this project on Edina. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby endorses the following resolution as adopted by the Community Development and Planning Commission: "WHEREAS, there currently exists in the area of France Avenue and I -494 traffic congestion at peak hours; and WHEREAS, the proposed Homart office -hotel development is to be developed on the Edina side of I -494; and WHEREAS, the Homart development would be three times as intense as-a similar development in Edina; and WHEREAS, the proposed development would negatively impact people living and work- ing in the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development and Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that all appropriate steps be taken to effect a reduction in the intensity of this proposed development." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby seeks to meet with-the Bloomington City Council to discuss.this proposed development. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. REPORT GIVEN ON W. 70TH STREET /CORNELIA.DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL. Mr. Hoffman reported that the Minnesota Traffic Engineering Section has approved the justification report prepared by .the consulting firm of Strgar- Roscoe, Inc. on the traffic signal for W. 70th Street and Cornelia Drive and have concluded that the signal is warranted and could be funded one -half from State Aid Funds. He pointed out that traffic signals are funded on a leg entry basis and because two other legs are involved only one -half of .the project could be so funded. Highest estimated signal cost is $60,000 plus approximately $10,000 for design and supervision of the project. The cost to the City would be approximately $35,000 to be covered from contingency funds or through some other mechanism. Member Bredesen stated he was concerned about using contingency funds for the traffic signal and suggested that we look elsewhere to see if we could cut back on other expenditures to meet this cost. Member Kelly made a motion to proceed with the installation of the traffic signal and to ask the School District to participate in the cost. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Discussion followed and Member Richards commented that the decision for the traffic signal was based on the assumption that the monies would come from State Aid funds; that during the hearing process the question of financing the project was raised and that the Council should first hear from the School and the area residents and consider other options for.funding the.cost. Member Kelly then withdrew the motion. Mr. Hoffman stated he would being back more information as to funding options and would contact the School as to their participation. No action was taken. POLICY ON SALE OF PARK PROPERTY DISCUSSED.. Mr: Rosland stated that from time to time citizens contact.staff about possible sale of City owned land and would like the- "Council to develop a policy, whether it is park property or some other City owned land that staff might consider surplus land, in dealing with such requests. Suggested procedure would be to notify everyone within a chosen radius, e.g. 350 ft., that such land may possibly be sold and then hold a public hearing on the matter. Member Richards stated he could not support any kind of policy that would dispose of any park property. Member Bredesen suggested that a general, broad policy be established to not sell park land and to consider a specific request.and.deal with that as it occurs. Mayor Courtney asked if.a specific parcel was involved and Mr. Rosland explained that currently the one in mind is a parcel that was cut by a roadway from park property. In response to the comments made, Mr. Rosland said staff would draft some general guidelines as to what City owned land might be con- sidered for sale and bring those back to the Council. No action was taken. CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that renewals for the various City insurance coverages will be due July 1, 1985. During the past eight years the City has able to obtain very good rates. However, the City can anticipate some major changes in the premium rates,. The key reason for this is primarily due to a total economic upheaval in the insurance industry due to lower interest rates and a dramatic rise in the cost of reinsurance. Staff has been working on renewals since the end of February and felt that the Council should be advised that it is expected that premiums will double and in some instances triple in rates. No action was taken. 5/6/85, COUNCIL /LEGISLATORS BREAKFAST SCHEDULED MAY 24. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council that a breakfast meeting with our legislators and other local officials is scheduled for .7.30--.a.m. on Friday, May 24 in the Manager's. Conference Room. POLICE DEPARTMENT COMMENDED. Member Kelly commended,the Police Department for the prompt action taken by a police officer recently in responding to a call for help for a neighborhood resident who recently suffered a heart attack, and commented that the prompt response undoubtedly saved the life of that person. CITY NEWSLETTER LISTS COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES. Member Turner commented that the April 1, 1985 Edina Newsletter listed the community health services that are available to residents together with the phone number for First Call for Help. She said she was pleased to see the prompt response of the staff to the suggest- ions made at the joint meeting of the Council /Advisory Board of Health held in March, 1985 that this information be disseminated to the public. No action taken. ORDINANCE REGARDING REGULATING DISH ANTENNAS TO BE PLACED ON AGENDA. Member Turner stated that-she has read about pending Federal legislation concerning dish antennas and asked about the status of the City's ordinance relating to this type of tele- communication equipment. Mr. Rosland recalled that at Second Reading of Ordinance No. 812 -A2 the motion for adoption was defeated and the issues of both dish antennas and other similar types of accessory uses of personal property was referred back to the Planning Commission for review. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to again place Second Reading of the ordinance on the next Council Agenda. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LETTER FROM JOHN HAGEN REGARDING UTILITY BILLING DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen asked that staff respond to the letter from John Hagen, 6400 Xerxes Avenue So., which was addressed to Member Bredesen, regarding the water and sewer-billings for his residence. Mr. Rosland said that a.response would be sent to Mr. Hagen. CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Member Richards reported he -would present recommendations for the City Hall Space Study Committee members at the next Council Meeting. No action was taken. BOARD OF REVIEW SCHEDULED FOR MAY 13, 1985.. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council that they are scheduled to meet as the Board of Review on Monday, May 13, 1985, at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Room to hear those residents who wish to appeal their property valuations for assessment purposes. BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. As recommended by Mr. Hoffman, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICIATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS SS -369 & 370, 85 -5B; WM -353, 354 & 355, 85 -5A; ST.S -175 & 176; C -143 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulle- tin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NUMBERS SS -369 & 370, 85 -5B; WM -353; 354 & 355, 85 -5A St.S. -175. & 176; C -143 CONTRACT 485 -5 (ENG) BIDS CLOSE MAY 16, 1985 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.m., May 16, 1985 and the Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, May 20, 1985 to consider said bids for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and graveling. The following are approxi- mate quantities of the major items: 5/6/85 2020 L /F, Sanitary Sewer 8 thru 15" 4500 L /F, Watermain 6 & 8" 1740 L /F, Storm Sewer 12 thru 30" 1986 Ton, Cl. 2 Gravel Bids shall be in a, sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the,City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office.. of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn- City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims dated 5/1/85: General Fund $174,109.64, Park Dept $22.50, Art Center $3,261.77, Swimming Pool Fund $4,981.04, Golf Course Fund $45,099.07, Recreation Center Fund $3,737.08, Gun Range Fund $2,168.90, Water Fund $9,265.58, Utility Fund $194,166.28, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,414.29, Construction Fund $19,721.04, Total $459,947.19. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. City Clerk tl 'n MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 20, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. AWARD OF HONOR PRESENTED. Mayor Courtney read the following'Award of Honor which, as a plaque, was presented to Theodore Charles Frank: Award of Honor Theodore Charles Frank April 22, 1985 Theodore Charles Frank is given the Award of Honor for his heroic rescue act of April 22, 1985. On that date, he was traveling on West 66th.Street in Edina adjacent to Lake Cornelia. Another motorist lost control of her vehicle, and it left the roadway, goin& into the lake. The driver was unable to extricate herself, and the vehicle began to sink. With little regard for his own personal safety, Mr. Frank dove into the icy water, swam to the vehicle, dove underwater to check for additional passengers, and then freed the driver by pulling her through the window of the vehicle. Mr. Frank then aided the driver to shore and provided for her comfort. Mr. Frank's deeds exceed those expected of the common man. He acted in a courageous manner and possibly saved the life of a motorist. For this, he deserves our commendation and Award of Honor. Signed: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police; and C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor. EMPLOYEE COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Rick Jacobson, the City's Assistant Park and.Recreation Director. Rick will be leaving to become the Director of Park and Recreation in Golden Valley. He has been with the City of Edina since 1969, coming on board as the Recreation Supervisor. In 1977, he became the Assistant Park and Recreation Director. On behalf of the City of Edina, Mr. Rosland extended wishes for success in his new position, and he commented that Rick is one of the finest Park and Recreation people in the, Twin City area and the State of Minnesota. PRD -3 PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVED FOR CAHILL ROAD AND WEST 78TH STREET (KLODT CON- STRUCTION). Affidavits.of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised that the subject project, generally located at the NW quadrant of Cahill Road and West 78th Street, was rezoned to PRD -3 in 1980 to allow the construction of an 89 unit, 8 building condominium project. In March of 1983, a plan was approved which contained 54 condominium units in two buildings on.the,east side of the site while leaving three original condominium buildings containing.35 units on the westerly portion of the site. In August of 1983, a second amendment was approved which increased the condominium count from 54 to 60 units and replaced the original units on the west side with 29 townhouse units. None of the plans have commenced construction. Mr. Larsen stated that the proponent, Klodt Construction Company, had submitted new plans which modify the overall development by reducing the number of townhouse units from 29 to 24 and increases the number'of condominium units from 60 to 65, all of which would be in one building, not two as.previously approved. The townhouse units were presented as four six -unit structures. The overall density of 8.5 units per acre and the unit count of 89 remains the same in all proposals. The current proposal represents a departure from the earlier,proposal in two significant respects. First, the condominium units would now all be in one building. This results in a much more imposing building. Second, the townhouses are now proposed to have one main living floor and a walk -out basement. The earlier proposal had two living levels plus a basement. This increases lot coverage and increases the amount of the site occupied by the townhouses. Mr. Larsen explained that there would be 2,015 square feet for each townhouse unit, which includes the floor area of the garages. In this respect, the individual unit sizes would be similar to those in the previous plan. Units in the condominium building have been reduced slightly in size and are now proposed at the minimum size required in the Ordinance. Parking, lot coverage and building and parking setbacks all conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The landscaping plan conforms in regard to quantities, but the sizes of some items are smaller than required. Deciduous trees should be 22 inches in 5/20/85 diameter, and coniferous trees should be at least 6 feet in height. The proposed utility plan is satisfactory for the condominium but needs additional information for the townhouse portion of the site. The two curb cuts on Cahill Road limit or prevent access by fire - fighting equipment. Mr. Larsen reported that the proposed use and mix of unit types remain from previously approved plans and that Staff continues to support the concept. The Community Development and Planning Commission heard the subject proposal at its May 1, 1985, meeting and recommended approval, subject to the following conditions: 1):Redesign of access to accommodate emergency vehicles; 2) A utility plan acceptable to City Staff; 3) Developer's agreement; 4) Shademaster Locust be increased to a minimum caliper diameter of 22 inches; and 5) Spruce trees be increased to a mininum of six feet in height. Mr. Paul Klodt, the proponent of the plan, was introduced. He explained that the change was being made in the townhouse project; the one -story unit would be marketed much better than the two or three -story units. Most of the units would be walk -outs. Mr. Klodt felt that the market for this particular type of unit was the "empty nester." The proponent met with the neighbors and expressed their concern regarding the proximity of the project to their property; the proponent agreed to provide a hedge of evergreens to shield the project from the neighbors' view, which in turn would help the project aesthetically. Mr. Klodt advised that the apartment -type units would be pretty much the same as the original plan, except that they would now be in one building instead of two. Mrs. Kelly pointed out that this was a pretty piece of property and hoped that as many of the trees as possible could be saved. Mr. William Harrison, on the Board of Directors of the Winwood Association, was introduced. He explained that Winwood is a neighbor of Pondwood to the north, and a common boundary is shared from one side to the other. He expressed the concern about the protection offered by the hedge of evergreens, and Mr. Klodt assured him that the landscaping will take this into consideration. Also under consideration is the view from Cahill. Mr. Harrison then thanked Mr. Klodt and wished him well. No further comment being heard, Member Richards moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the petition of Klodt Construction Company for.a PRD -3 Plan Amendment for townhouse /condominium units at Cahill Road and West 78th Street be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1) Redesign of access to accommodate emergency vehicles; 2) A utility plan acceptable to City Staff; 3) Developer's agreement; 4) Shademaster Locust be increased to a minimum caliper diameter of 22 inches; and 5) Spruce trees be increased to a minimum of six feet in height. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR OPUS CORPORATION /NATIONAL CAR RENTAL SYSTEMS. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen described the subject property as being generally located west of France Avenue and south of West 76th Street at 7700 France Avenue. He reported that it is being developed with a four -story office building containing 229,100 square feet of floor area. The building will serve as corporate head- quarters for National Car Rental. When the new Zoning Ordinance was adopted in .1984, the site was rezoned from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Planned Office District -2 (POD -2). National Car is proposing a five -story addition containing a gross area of approximately 106,655 square feet which would be constructed on the north end of the existing four--story building. Floor area limits were imposed on this and other parcels in the plat of Edina Office Center in 1978 because of traffic concerns in the area; these restrictions were removed by the City Council in 1983. The development of the site is now limited by the 0.5 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of the Office District in the Zoning Ordinance, and the proposed addition would result in a FAR of approximately 0.36 for the site. Mr. Larsen reported that the Zoning Ordinance requires parking at a rate of one space for each 250 square of gross floor area in office buildings which are in excess of 220,000 square feet. Due to the high parking demand created by National Car, the proposal calls for approximately 230 more parking spaces than required by the Zoning Ordinance. The drive aisle and 15 existing parking stalls 5/20/85 south of the building maintain non - conforming setbacks. The Zoning Ordinance requires that all parking and drive aisles maintain a 20 -foot minimum setback from any street right -of -way. The proponents have stated their willingness to remove the parking spaces, but due to the location of certain mechanical equipment near the building, relocation of the drive isle to conform to the setback requirement would be difficult and costly. Thus, a 5 -foot setback variance is requested for the drive isle. Mr. Larsen explained that when the property was platted, a 40 -foot easement was dedicated along the southerly boundary of the property and • 60 -foot wide easement was provided on the westerly end of the site to provide • connection to West 77th Street. It was anticipated that these roadways would be constructed when the drive -in theater was redeveloped. The City has commissioned BRW to make a recommendation on the design of the link from West 77th Street to the new road. It was reported that staff believes that the addition will compliment the existing high quality of the development. Approval of the final development plan along with a 5 -foor drive isle setback variance to allow the existing drive isle to remain is recommended with the following conditions: 1) That additional right -of -way, as needed on the westerly portion of the site, be dedicated at this time; and '2) That the non - conforming parking speces along the south property line be removed. Mr. Bob Worthington of Opus Corporation, representing National Car, was introduced. He explained that the addition will be used for additional office space for National Car, utilizing an open office concept. Additional storage space will be needed, and the cafeteria will be expanded to allow for a French outdoor cafe feeling instead of a totally enclosed space. There will also be space for utility rooms within the building. Mr. Worthington feels the design is com- patible with the existing architecture, and they may be back in the future for even further expansion. Construction, if the project is approved, is slated to begin in June of 1985, with a completion date of April, 1986. Member Kelly questioned the proposed road to be cut through on the southern portion as to whether it will impact the proposed Homart Project and its nearness to the drainage ditch. Mr. Hoffman explained that the road will go right over the top of the ditch and northwest over to 77th Street. He commented that the road is tied into serving both properties ( Homart and Opus), and it serves as an extra outlet from the Pentagon Park area. Half of the road is on Edina's property, and the other half is in Bloomington. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Opus Corporation /National.Car Rental Systems at 7700 France Avenue be and hereby approved and that a 5 -foot drive isle setback variance is granted, subject to the following conditions: 1) That additional right -of -way, as needed on the westerly portion of the site, be dedicated at this time; and 2) That the non - conforming parking spaces along the south property line be removed when the new street is constructed. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT FOR ROBERT ANDERSON OF 425 WASHINGTON AVENUE FAILED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney Avenue, actually on the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County Road 18 is located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is to the south. The site measures 70 feet in width, approximately 125 in depth and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. The site is vacant. The proponent, Mr. Robert Anderson, is requesting rezoning of the site from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District, in order to allow the construction of a two -unit dwelling. The zoning ordinance requires R -2 lots to be at least 90 feet in width and to contain at least 15,000 square feet in lot area. Consequently, lot width and lot area variances would also be required to make this a buildable R -2 site. Mr. Larsen described the two -block stretch of lots fronting on Washington Avenue as low- density attached residential. At the present time, there are four existing doubles which are zoned R -2 and two legal, non - conforming doubles on Washington. There are eleven single - dwelling units fronting on Washington Avenue. The existing double bungalow lots measure between 76 and 79 feet in width, except for the most northerly lot "which measures 124 feet in width. The existing R -1 lots measure between 45 and 78 feet in width. Mr. Larsen explained that the subject site is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as being suitable for the proposed use. In addition to this designation, the Plan contains a policy which states: "Consider the redevelopment or retro- filling of single - family dwellings to multi - family uses if located in areas 5/20/85 designated as low density attached residential. Such redevelopment or retro- filling should require rezoning and upgrading of dwellings and properties to multi - family standards." Using the required setbacks for the lot, it appears that a modestly sized double bungalow or duplex could be constructed on the site which would conform to zoning ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen stated that the development or redevelopment of properties along Washington as doubles is reasonable and to be expected; however, he commented that staff does have reservations concerning the minimum size of lots to be developed as doubles. (At this time, 7:35 PM, Member Bredesen arrived.) Mr. Robert Anderson, the owner of the subject property, presented to the Council the plan of the structure. He pointed out that the garages are in the front of the structure, with the setback being 30 or 35 feet. There is an alley in the back which is not being used at the present time; the lots have extended into the alley, although the alley has not been officially vacated. The cemetery is immediately to the south, and County Road 18 is to the front of the dwelling, immediately to the west. Member Richards indicated that this is a strong neighbor- hood of single- family residences; he felt that a more appropriate use, given the variance being requested, would be R -1 and not R -2. Therefore, he did not support the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mrs. Turner commented that this concept is similar to accessory housing; this is a transitional area between single family homes and a busy highway. She felt that it was an opportunity for relatively modest housing and that the zoning request is appropriate. Member Richards indicated that this is a situation in which the exact same square footage of land has doubled its density; this creates problems in other contexts and other forms. He felt that land packages could be created for a better environment. Member Kelly pointed out a similar home on either William or Bedford built on property that wasn't quite adequate, so the garage was put out in .front. -Mr. Anderson commented that. the garage out in front of the subject property was to serve as a buffer from County Road 18. He added that there are two double bungalows right next door to the . project. There being no further discussion, Member Turner's motion for approval of the zoning change was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner Nays: Richards, Courtney Motion failed. APPEAL FROM BOARD OF APPEALS & ADJUSTMENTS REGARDING JOHN GABBERT'S PROPERTY AT 7010 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH WITHDRAWN. Planner Larsen reported that the proponent has asked to withdraw the appeal, which pertained to 7010 France Avenue South, Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R. W. W., Block 1, Stow's Edgemoor Addition. There was no further discussion. HEALTH HAZARDS OF LAWN SPRAYING WITH CHEMICALS DISCUSSED. Mary Reed, 5100 Skyline Drive, spoke of her concern regarding Chemlawn's spraying of chemicals on lawns approximately two times each month. She reported that she had spoken with the Health Department three years ago, and she was told that a study had been done. She felt that a new study should be done in .that there might be some new information in regard to the chemicals and associated health hazards. Mr. Rosland reported that the outcome of a study indicated that the City's spraying is done in a very judicious manner and every piece of property is not sprayed all the time. __Mayor Courtney recommended obtaining information from the study done in St. Paul. Mr. Rosland commented that all of the known chemicals are being used; there are pros and cons as to whether any of them cause cancer or not. All of these chemicals, however, have been approved by the State; nevertheless, this does not rule out the fact that they might be harmful. Member Bredesen reported that there has been a concern regarding the particles from the chemicals getting into the air; he also recommended following up with St. Paul's study. Mr. Rosland explained that the City's spraying is usually in the early.morning and late evening, prior to dark; a wetting agent is used time to time which makes it a heavier spray, and this makes the particles less apt to blow in the air. Perhaps a local company should be contacted which builds sprayers to find out what customers use. Mr. Rosland will report back on this issue. BID AWARDED FOR SANITARY SEWER, WATERMAIN, STORM SEWER AND GRAVELING. Mr. Rosland presented the bids for Improvement No.'s SS -369, 370, 85 -5B; WM -353, 354, 355, 85 -5A; St. S. -175, 176 and C -143, which pertain to sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and graveling. The recommended low bidder was Brown 5/20/85 & Cris, Incorporated at $270,258.60; Northdale Construction Company, Incorpor- ated at $290,535.15; G. L. Contracting, Incorporated at $298,509.26; Hayes Contractors, Incorporated'at $320,289.83; and L. & G. Rehbein, Incorporated at $354,041.25. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for award to recommended low bidder, Brown & Cris, Incorporated, for sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer and graveling. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 5/14/85 APPROVED. There being no items for Council's authorization of recommendation action, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the Traffic Safety Committee minutes of May 14, 1985, specifically acknowledging Sections B and C of the Minutes. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT APPROVED. Mr. Rosland referred to a letter to Mayor Courtney from Mrs. Barbara Reynolds, Chair of the Edina Advisory Health Commission, which provides reasons for renewing the public health contract with the two -year plan of the Community Health Services: 1. Because the CHS plan is developed out of the identification of needs and goals for health services in Edina, it makes sense to plan jointly with service pro- vider for meeting those needs and goals for the full tow -year period. 2. Continuity in the provision of health care services can be guaranteed for at least a minimum of two years. 3. With a two -year contract, the Advisory Commission and the City Council (Board of Health) can become familiar with the service providers and be knowledgeable regarding their capabilities, staff expertise and range of services. 4. Because of the necessity of the public health service providers having knowledge of the community, its residents, resources, and its "culture," in order to discover needs, to made appropriate referrals, and to provide services and programs, a two -year contract seems necessary. 5. It is important for our Edina residents to become familiar with their health service providers. Communication is difficult enough without frequent changes in health provider. 6. Each year, many hours of time go into discussion and decision - making by the City Council, the paid staff of the City and the Advisory Commission, that could better be spent in program planning or development, if that decision did not have to be made every year. 7:. The likelihood of an organization entering into a contract seems greater if the contract is for two years; it takes time to develop new systems of services and programs. Mr. Rosland pointed out that -this would be a two -year commitment rather than one year at a time and that this is agreeable to the staff. Member Bredesen commented he would like to see what a two -year contract would look like. Member Richards announced that Barbara Reynolds is moving out of Edina; he thanked her on behalf of the Council. Mayor Courtney remarked that she won't be forgotten after all that she has done for the City, and he then introduced her. Mrs. Reynolds reported that the Advisory Health Commission is an excellent committee of individuals, and she knows that they will continue to work well, especially with the support given them by the City. With.no more discussion, Mr. Rosland said that no formal action was needed to approve the Public Health Services contract; he accepted the concurrence of the Council for the acceptance of this contract. SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE APPROVED. Member Richards motion for appointment of the following persons to serve on the Space Study Committee was seconded by Member Turner; Cathy Christensen, 6600 Pawnee Road; Bart Foster, 65516 Cherokee Trail; June Schmidt, 7005 Bristol Blvd.; Bob Schoening, 4612 Edina Blvd.; Dave Sherman, 19 Circle West. Bob Schoening will serve as Chair. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. IMPROVEMENT HEARING FOR WEST 70TH STREET /CORNELIA DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL SET FOR JUNE 17, 1985. Mr. Hoffman reviewed the report on West 70th Street. He pointed out that the Council had decided that West 70th Street would be classified as a collector street rather than an arterial roadway. The consultant prepared a signal justification report which was submitted to the State to see if the State would agree that a traffic light was warranted. The State mathematically computed that it would meet the criteria for a school- activated crossing, and they would pay 50% of the cost. The State fee is based on "entering legs" to an intersection; in this case, there are four approaching legs. Therefore, the State would pay for two West 70th Street legs, or $35,000. The City intends to go ahead with the 5/20/85 striping and signing plan. A request for funding for the remaining $35,000 for the traffic signal was made to the School District; the Board felt this was an inappropriate request and that the City ought to fund this. Mr. Rosland reported that three areas were investigated in regard to the necessary funding. One, department heads were asked if their budgets could be investigated for sources of funding and to look at the capital areas in replacement of vehicles and the capital improvements. Second, the question of discontinuing certain programs was considered, as well as reducing the number of staff in numerous departments and starting new employees at lower rates. Judicial use of the staff could help make up a portion of approximately $15,000 to $20,000. Mr. Rosland does not recommend laying off staff in any way. Finally, an estimated $50,000 in building fees from Edinborough is projected, which will be available this year; there will be joint staffing for this project through Building and Assessing. Member Bredesen questioned insurance increases, and Mr. Rosland commented that the amount at this time is unknown. This situation might bring about going into the contingencies or possibly the reserves. Member Richards asked if the City has ever had to fund traffic signalization before, and Mr. Hoffman pointed out that this would be the first time. He reported that Southdale Office Center on the west side of France Avenue and Southdale Shopping Center on the east side of France Avenue paid for 100% of the two signals.at their major intersections on France Avenue. Member Bredesen pointed out that the land.being school property at 70th .& Cornelia warranted the State's involvement in their portion of the funding, because of the significant amount of pedestrian activity going on. Member Turner questioned whether approving this signalization would in any way delay going ahead with the signals on Vernon; Mr. Hoffman responded that this would not impact Vernon. Member Richards questioned the length of time it would take to get signalization once approval is given by local government. Mr. Hoffman commented that in this case, because justification has already been evidenced, bids could be taken in July after plans have been reviewed; the process would take up to twelve weeks, bringing it to termination around the first part of October with this signal at this point in time. Mrs. Phyllis Kohler, 4512 West 70th Street, spoke before the Council; she implied that she believed that this had already been decided on January 21, 1985. Her comments: The State, the citizens and the private con- sultant all say that we need this total package, and the traffic signal is a major part of that package; the park located there, not just the school, uses this corner for crossing in connection with athletic activities; the State gave us what we asked for in regard to the funding of this traffic signal. Member Kelly questioned whether the cost of a self - activating signal more or less expensive than a regular signal; Mr. Hoffman commented that the cost is the same. Mrs. Kohler indicated that the signal would only operate in a self - activating manner late in the evening and very early in the morning; contrary to most signals, this intersection has unusual peak hours.. Mr. Hoffman remarked that "no parking" along 70th Street would have to be authorized by the Council, which means no parking during the 24 -hour day. This could affect some of the residential properties along 70th Street. With the new type of striping layout, there can be no parking along the curb. Mrs. Kohler said that it is usually the tourist who parks along 70th rather than the resident. Mr. Harold Babb, 4701 West 70th, reported that he has never parked along 70th Street; he indicated that the delivery of mail is a problem. Mr. Hoffman commented that all mailboxes were to be removed from along the curb and mail would be delivered to the houses. At this point, Member Turner moved approval of going ahead with the signal, with the City participating in a cost of approximately $35,000, based on the financial plan presented by Mr. Rosland; this motion was seconded by Member Kelly. This funding would come out of savings on the staff and fees from Edinborough. Member Bredesen indicated when the insurance premium increases are complete, there might not be any money left over to spend on this project; therefore, he wanted to make sure that this $35,000 expenditure is credited against next year's budget. He pointed out that the school is a major contributor to the traffic problem at this site; the School District's lack of interest in par- ticipating in the funding is remarkable. He encouraged looking into creating an assessment district there and hold a hearing to decide whether an assessment is the way to pay for this signal. Mr. Hoffman said that the project could be designed and brought back the night of the hearing. Mrs. Kohler reported that 79% of the people who go through this intersection do not live in this Zip code area; these are the people who are causing the problem, and they are not the residents. She questioned, then, why the residents only should be assessed. Mayor Courtney commented that the same thing is true for any other street, and that residents have always paid for their own streets; anyone from any location can use 70th Street at any time. Member Richards supports going ahead and getting 5/20/85 design but delaying approval as to the funding or ordering of the project. A notice would then be sent to all the people on 70th as to how the striping will be handled. The staff could then come back with some alternatives as to what the assessment district will look at. Mr. Hoffman reported that staff could be back with the hearing process in place on June 17, 1985. No ground would be lost in doing this; the frame of time for completion would be the same. Member Turner feels strongly that the commitment is there and.we must move ahead, and because the assessment hearing will not delay the completion of the signal, she withdrew her motion. If people object to the assessment hearing, the funding then will come out the project proposed by Mr. Rosland; therefore, there will be no delay. Mr. Erickson, the City Attorney, explained that there are two stages involved - - -the improvement hearing comes before the assessment hearing. The improvement would be ordered after the first hearing, which would take into account the plans already prepared; the assessment hearing would follow, once the assess- ment amount was known. Should an assessment be decided, 100% of the amount the City would pay need not be assessed; any part of it can be assessed. Also at that time of the assessment, the areas assessed can be reduced. Therefore, to start, a fairly large assessment district is recommended; this allows for more manueverability. With no further discussion, Member Richards' motion that staff move forward to prepare the hearing plans and submit them to the State and other appropriate agencies that need to review and approve the plans and that the Staff come back on. June 17 for an improvement hearing to discuss an assessment district and finally that notification of the striping on 70th be given to the residents, was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REVIEW OF ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE COMMUNITY CENTER'S KITCHEN REFERRED TO A STAFF TASK FORCE. Mr. Rosland explained that the Community Center has requested the Council to look at an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to permit the occupancy of the Center's kitchen by a commercial caterer. Staff's only concern with this is whether the catering service would extend its services beyond the confines of the school. Mr. Doug Johnson, Director of the Edina Community Center, explained that this summer the Center's kitchen will merge with the High School; it will continue to service the Edina schools but will not serve any of tenants and staff within the Center. Currently, the kitchen is ,operated by the District. It serves the Center, the Edina elementary schools and Southview Junior High. In addition, it provides coffee, cookies and meals to groups using the facility. This "catering" type business produces gross revenues of close to $4,000 per month; the total.gross revenue for the kitchen is close to $400,000 per year. Mr. Johnson stated that the hot lunch program and catering type services are vital to the current and future operation of the Community Center. Cooking schools, which fit the zoning requirements, were contacted to find out if there was any interest in leasing the kitchen; this brought no results. Mr. Johnson indicated that the groups that best fit the needs of the Center are catering -type organizations. Numerous caterers have been contacted regarding leasing, and several have expressed interest. All of them have been made aware of the zoning limitations. As a result of this, Mr. Johnson is, therefore, very anxious for the Council to consider a zoning amendment. He pointed out that the Council should keep in mind the following: 1) Food services are critical to the operation of a true Community Center. Tenants, staff and users of the facility all use these services. 2) It is unlikely that any caterer would generate anywhere near as much traffic as the District's own food service. 3) Lease of the kitchen area would provide revenue to offset the cost of operating the Center. Mr. Johnson told the Council that this could be done with some type of a conditional.use permit, with a limitation that it would have to be reviewed every so often. Member Richards questioned whether the catering service would be able to go out and market its services anywhere in a for - profit type of situation. Mr. Johnson implied that Council might consider restrictions in the form of a conditional use permit; then the Council could vote on a particular group applying for the lease, with staff shedding light on particular applicants. Mr. Johnson explained that the type of group they are looking for would provide the kinds of services necessary for the functioning of the Community Center. The District has already contacted the tenants in the building that they will not be servicing them under any condition next year; therefore, unless the Zoning Ordinance is amended and a caterer commissioned, there would be no food service available for them. A larger concern would be the lack of service available to the groups using the building. Member Kelly indicated she would support a change in the ordinance 5/20/85 to allow this catering service. She explained that a particular tenant, Edina Woman's Club, was not able to meet at the Center because of the cafeteria not. being available due to the school already using it. It would be nice for groups such as that to have access to the Community Center with food or meals available; this does make a true Community Center. Member Bredesen spoke up in opposition to this proposed amendment; he is not in favor of the Center becoming a commercial facility in any way. He implied that the concept of a catering service being operated out of the school, with or without limits on how much they are operating out of the school, runs contrary to the notion of how'that facility should be used. He stated that the public problem involved in groups having lunches available from time to time in the Community Center is smaller than the public problem involved in making this facility more commercial in nature. Member Turner reminded Council that they could be turning this over to the Planning Commission, having staff draw up a potential amendment to the Zoning Ordinance for Council to consider. She felt that a food service is key to the Community Center for the tenants, the schools there and the occasional groups that would use the facility. Member Richards commented that the Council attempt to set forth a parameter before it goes to the Planning Commission, because.it might come back with the words "just a little bit profit" or a "little bit of a commercial nature." Member Kelly asked how Member Bredesen felt that this issue affected the neighbors; he commented that a commercial catering operation would not do anything to decrease the traffic and would increase a parking problem. Member Bredesen explained that if the tenants in the building do not want to pay for the cost of having a food service, the public in the area immediately around the facility should not have to solve that. He does not recommend sending the proposal back to the Planning Commission. Mr. Johnson explained that a definite rate on the kitchen has not yet been set, because this depends on the type of group that comes in, as to how many months of the year they will be operating. Mr. Rosland questioned whether the School District pays any rent now to the Community Center for the kitchen; in a technical sense they pay rent for everything they use because the building loses money. If they pull out and the Center rents, the loss is limited. Member Kelly pointed out that if we have to bend and vary a little, that's progress; Edina probably would not be where it is today if changes had not come along. Member Richards stated that the reason Edina is where it is today is because of its strict adherence to the ordinances. He reported that he believes in the concept of the user fee in which those users who are going to avail themselves of the service pay for it. Mr. Rosland recommended that staff work with Mr. Johnson, looking further into this, rather than sending it back to the Planning Commission; this could help create other alternatives without having to change the ordinance. A group could brainstorm this, and it was suggested that this group, or task force, consist of Mr. Rosland, Mr. Hughes and Mr. Johnson, and perhaps another City staff member. There being no further discussion, Member Kelly's motion to refer the study of the Community Center's kitchen to the suggested task force was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 1985 NOMINATIONS FOR LMC BOARD OF DIRECTORS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland announced that the League of Minnesota Cities is looking for nominations for its Board of Directors. Mr. Jim Miller from Minnetonka is running for the Vice Presidency. Mr. Rosland encouraged Council to submit names to the nominating committee. There was no further discussion. BILTMORE MOTEL SITE DISCUSSED. Member Kelly pointed out that the Biltmore Motel site is a blight to the community because it is being poorly maintained. She feels the City should go in and cut the grass and assess the present owner. Mr. Rosland reported that Council should be. hearing from the owner in the near future as Mr. Hughes indicated after a recent meeting. Apparently, the ownership is being reworked, and there is a new partner. Mr Rosland assured Council that the lawn would soon be taken care of, and there was no further discussion. CONCERN RAISED REGARDING CHILDREN BEING USED TO RAISE MONEY FOR A NON- PROFIT CAUSE NOT ALTOGETHER LEGITIMATE. Member Turner reported that she received a telephone call from Mary Kluesner, 4409 Country Club Road, with a concern about children used to raise money, going door -to -door, and whether or not all the concerns are legitimate, especially if the children are not from Edina. Member Turner said the ordinance does not require non - profits to register with the City; for - profit organizations are required to register with the City before they go door -to -door. She reported that she and Mrs. Kluesner spoke with Chief Swanson and found out that there are many complaints like this. Chief Swanson will keep track of the complaints the City gets during the month of June. Member Turner explained that, 5/20/85 according to the ordinance, residents have the option of saying "no" to solicitors; if they question the legitimacy of the organization, they can call City Hall to check on for- profit registration. She indicated that Mrs. Kluesner would like to see the City tighten up its restrictions; however, the City must be careful not to restrict the rights of its local organizations from going door -to -door to raise money. Member Bredesen emphasized that a citizen of Edina need not give money to anybody involved in an unknown charity. He indicated that the adults that are taking advantage of these children are going to continue to do so, and they will quickly move on to some other community before the City can begin to do something about it. Member Kelly reported that there a great number of solicitors in her neighborhood who are not from Edina; she indicated that there should be a way of listing all non - profits. Mr. Kojetin suggested that a list could be included in the City's Newsletter. Mr. Erickson explained that the current ordinance regarding solicitations is an old one; he suspects that much of this ordinance is unenforceable._ He suggested that it be looked at to see if it could be strengthened and modified. Member Turner cautioned restricting the non - profits., Chief Swanson will continue to track the complaints through June, and sometime thereafter it will be brought back for further discussion. MEETING SET FOR UPDATE OF LONG -RANGE PLANNING BUDGET. Member Turner suggested that a meeting be planned to update the strategic planning of the budget. Staff starts the budget process in June; an update meeting would be timely. Mr. Rosland recommended June 17 before the Council Meeting, from 5:00 to 7:00 P. M. Council informally agreed to meet at this time. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS ANNOUNCED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council of the Legislative Breakfast on May 24 at 7:30 A. M., the Board of Review on May 28 at 5:00 P. M., the AMM Annual Meeting on May 30 at 6:30 P. M. and the LMC Conference from June 11 to June 14 in St. Paul. Mr. Rosland indicated that Member Turner will most likely become a new Board Member at the AMM Annual Meeting. It was also announced that June 24 is "Edina Nite at the Twins "; this is a big promotion by the Edina Chamber of Commerce. ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3 AMENDING THE ORDINANCE GRANTING TEMPORARY RELIEF TO ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS ADOPTED ON SECOND READING, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE FINAL CONTRACTS BY THE CITY MANAGER AND THE CITY ATTORNEY. Mr. Erickson explained that this Relief Ordinance is basically the same as presented at the last meeting, except for the addition of a clause that it become effective only with the other four cities (Eden Prairie, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield) passing a similar ordinance. Mr. Rosland reported that at this time these four cities have granted the ordinance First Reading. (At this time, Member Richards excused himself.) Member Bredesen moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1120 -A3 subject to approval of the final contracts by the City Manager and the City Attorney: ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1120 TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE; TO EXTEND THE FRANCHISE TERM; TO CHANGE THE INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS; AND TO CHANGE THE COMPUTATION OF THE PURCHASE PRICE TO BE PAID BY CITY UPON EXPIRATION OF THE FRANCHISE. THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraphs J and S of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: J. "Grantee" is Rogers Cablesystems of.Minnesota Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, with Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, as the General Partner. S. "SWSCC" shall mean the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. Sec. 2. That Article II, Sec. 4 of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: This Franchise shall commence upon acceptance by Grantee and shall expire on December 31, 1995. Provided, however, that if by December 31, 1987, Grantee (i) is able to close on, and have funded, without conditions, new long term financing, reasonably satisfactory to City, to replace the obligation evidenced by loan documents dated April 1, 1982, from Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada, in the original principal amount of Eighteen Million and No /100 Dollars ($18,000,000.00) (the "Existing Indebtedness "), and (ii) gives written notice of such new financing to City with written evidence thereof reasonably acceptable to City, then, upon the occurrence of (i) and (ii) by December 31, 1987, the term of this Franchise shall be extended'by four (4) years, from December 31, 1995 to December 31,1999, subject, however, to approval of such extension by the.Board, if required, and the FCC, if required, and any other governmental body having jurisdiction over the matter, if required. 5/20/85 If any such approvals are required, City and Grantee agree to cooperate in obtaining such approvals. If any such approvals are required, and are not obtained, for any reason, then the four (4) year extension shall not become effective. If such extension becomes effective, Grantee and City shall sign and deliver an agreement evidencing such extension, but such extension shall be effective even without such additional agreement. Sec. 3. That Article V, Sec. 2 of said Ordinance be amended by adding thereto a new Paragraph F as follows: F. City may waive, at any time and from time to time, for good cause shown, by Council resolution, compliance by Grantee with any or all of the require- ments imposed on Grantee by this Sec. 2 relative to providing service to any extended area or areas. Sec. 4. That Article VIII, Sec. 2, Paragraph A, subparagraph (4) of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: (4) Any and all claims which Grantee may now or hereafter have or claim to have against City, its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents, employees or officials, due to or arising out of, damage to any of Grantee's property or equipment, including, without limitation, resulting or consequential loss of income, injury to reputation, or any other resulting or consequential damages of any kind, caused by or resulting from acts or omissions of City or any of its officers, boards, commissions, servants, agents, employees or officials. Sec. 5. That Article VIII, Sec. 3, Paragraph A of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: A. Grantee shall maintain liability insurance covering its obligations of indemnification provided for in, or as a result of the exercise of, this Franchise (except, however, for the indemnifications in subparagraph (3) of Article VIII, Sec. 2, Paragraph A of this Franchise) covering both the City and Grantee and shall maintain said insurance during the term of this Franchise in the minimum of: 1. $500,00.00 for property damage to any one person; 2. $2,000,000.00 for property damage in any one act or occurrence; 3. $1,000,000.00 for personal injury to any one person; and 4. $2,000,000.00 for personal injury in any one act or occurrence. The.foregoing insurance may be provided by means of a blanket liability insurance policy or policies with an annual aggregate limitation of not less than $26,000,000.00. Sec. 6. That Article VIII, Sec. 3, Paragraph E of said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: E. All insurance policies maintained pursuant to this Franchise shall contain the following endorsements and provisions: (i) It is hereby understood and agreed that this insurance policy may not be cancelled nor the intention not to renew be stated until 60 days after receipt to City, by registered mail, of written notice of such intention to cancel or not to renew. (ii) A waiver of subrogation, in form and substance acceptable to City, as to any and all claims against the City which are waived hereunder by Grantee or as to which Grantee has agreed hereunder to indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, boards, commissioners, servants, officials, agents and employees. (iii) A provision that if the aggregate insurance coverage of the blanket policies provided by Grantee is ever reduced -below $10,000,000.00, then notice of such fact shall promptly be given to City by Grantee or Grantee's insurance agent and additional liability coverage shall immediately be purchased by Grantee so as to restore the annual aggregare to the minimum amount then required under this Franchise. Sec. 7. That Article XI, Sec. 2, Paragraph C of .said Ordinance be amended to read as follows: C. The purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon revocation or termination of the Franchise shall be the cost less depreciation (as shown on the books and records of Grantee) or the fair market value, whichever is less, and goodwill shall not be included in the purchase price of the System. However, if this Franchise expires (and is not revoked or terminated) and if Grantee has complied with the requirements of Article II, Sec. 4 of this Franchise, and all required approvals are obtained, so that the Franchise term is extended for an additional four (4) years pursuant to said Sec. 4, then the purchase price of the System to be paid by City upon expiration of this Franchise shall be the fair market value of the System determined on the basis of the System valued as a going concern but with no value given or allocated to this Franchise itself. If the City and Grantee cannot agree on the purchase price,'it shall be determined by arbitration pursuant to the provisions of this Sec. 2. 5/20/85 Sec. 8. This Ordinance will be effective in accordance with the provisions of Article XIV of said Ordinance, including delivery to City of the acceptance, opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said Article XIV, and provided further, however, that it shall become effective only if all of the cities of Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield adopt an ordinance similar to this Ordinance within ninety (90) days after the adoption of this Ordinance. Sec. 9. Subject to the provisions of Sec. 8 hereof, this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. City of Edina, MINNESOTA Attest: City Clerk By And Mayor City Manager ORDINANCE NO. 1121 PROVIDING CATV (CABLE TELEVISION) RELIEF ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Rosland indicated that the key aspect of this Ordinance is moving the franchise fees from 5 to 3 %, giving 2% relief to the Company, and the various cities picking up 1% of the programming. Member Bredesen moved adoption of Ordinance No:::1121 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1121 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION SERVICE, PROVIDING FOR MODIFICATION OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY'S CABLE COMMUNICATIONS ORDINANCE THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. Short Title. This ordinance shall be known as the "CATV Relief Ordinance." Sec. 2. Background and Purpose. The City has granted a cable television franchise through the adoption of City Ordinance Code No. 1120, the Cable Communications Ordinance (.hereinafter called the "Franchise "). The cities of Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins and Richfield (the "Other Cities ") have adopted similar ordinances, all with the same franchise Grantee. Through the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC "), a joint powers organization, the City and the Other Cities have undertaken to supervise Grantee's compliance with these ordinances. Since the adoption of the Franchise, Grantee has constructed and is operating a cable communications system in City and the Other Cities. Grantee has approached the City indicating that it is experiencing serious financial difficulties and would be unable to pay the franchise fee due and payable on November 1, 1984. Grantee requested a temporary reduction of its Franchise obligations to allow for its financial recovery. City authorized the SWSCC to review Grantee's request and make recommendations for an appropriate response. SWSCC retained a financial consultant to assist in analyzing Grantee's financial condition, held several public meetings, and conducted a, thorough review of Grantee's request. SWSCC determined that Grantee is experiencing serious financial difficulties caused by such adverse factors as higher than anticipated construction and operating costs, lower than projected market penetration, inability to obtain long -term financing at projected rates and other industry, economic and technological changes. SWSCC also concluded that Grantee cannot secure needed refinancing of its long -term debt, cannot continue to provide the present level of service and cannot become an economically viable enterprise unless the City grants a period of relief from some of the requirements of the Franchise. SWSCC recommends that the City grant temporary amendments to the Franchise, re- ducing the franchise fee payable now and in the future, eliminating the re- quired performance bond, and modifying the provisions for local programming. In return, Grantee would execute a Performance Agreement providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other matters related to Grantee's requested relief. The City has reviewed SWSCC's recommendations and has con- sidered the option of requiring full payment of the past due franchise fee through use of Grantee's letter of credit, performance bond, and parent company performance guarantees. Grantee represents, however, that if the City and the Other Cities seek payment of past due franchise fees through resort to such securities, this would only make it more difficult for Grantee to solve its financial problems and would be counterproductive to any effort to provide relief to Grantee. In adopting this ordinance, the City relies upon the re- presentations of�Grantee and seeks to provide a means by which the public can 5/20/85 continue to receive approximately the same level of service while affording Grantee a reasonable opportunity for financial recovery. The ultimate pur- pose of this ordinance is to secure, at a later time during the Franchise term, the full public benefits provided for in the Franchise. Sec. 3. Relationship to Cable Communications Ordinance. This ordinance does not permanently amend any provision of the Cable Commission Ordinance (the "Franchise ") but provides that certain provisions of that ordinance are modified for a period of time as provided in this Relief Ordinance. Except as expressly modified in this ordinance, the provisions of the Franchise remain in full force and effect. Sec. 4. Definitions. Subdivision 1. The definitions in the Franchise also apply to this ordinance.. Subd. 2. In addition, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings given them: (1) "Existing indebtedness" means an $18,000,000 loan made to Grantee to Toronto Dominion Bank of Toronto, Canada under loan documents dated April 1, 1982. (2) "Franchise" means the Cable Communications Ordinance as now or hereafter amended. (3) "Local Programming Obligations" means, for the purpose of this ordinance, Grantee's obligations under the Franchise and the offering for cablecast access, community access and local origination programming. (4) "Performance Agreement" means a contractual agreement between Grantee, City and SWSCC, providing a means for monitoring Grantee's financial condition, assuring an adequate level of local programming, and providing for certain other matters related to Grantee's requested relief. Sec. 5. Relief Granted. While this ordinance is in effect, the obligations of Grantee are modified to the extent provided in this section. Subdivision 1. Franchise Fees - Percentage. Commencing with Grantee's fiscal year, 1985, the annual franchise fee is re- duced from 5% of Gross Revenues to 3 %. Such annual fees shall be paid to City in equal quarterly payments on or before the first day of each of the months of November, February, May and August next following the end of Grantee's fiscal year. If this ordinance terminates during any of Grantee's fiscal years, the franchise fee shall be restored to the rate of 5% of Gross Revenues at the end of the calendar month in which termination occurs. The restored rate of 5% and the reduced rate of 3% shall be applied respectively to the Gross Revenues collected only in the months during which each rate was in effect. The fees accruing at the restored rate shall be paid in accordance with the terms of the Franchise. The fees accruing at the reduced rate shall be paid in equal quarterly installments in accordance with the terms of this ordinance. Subd. 2. Past Due Franchise Fees. The 1984 franchise fee in the amount of $103,055 payable on or before November 1, 1984, shall be deemed fully discharged and paid if, but only if, Grantee pays the sum of $61,833 to the City, in four equal payments on or before June 1, June 15, August 15 and October 15, 1985. Subd. 3. Letters of Credit. The City Council may by resolution reduce the required amount of the Letter of Credit below $50,000 if in its sole discretion it determines that a lesser amount is reasonable and adequate to protect the public. It may thereafter, by resolution, require the amount of the Letter of Credit to be increased or fully restored to the amount of $50,000. Grantee shall comply with this require- ment within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. 4. Performance Bond. The Grantee may dispense with the $300,000 performance bond required by the Franchise. The City Council may thereafter by resolution require that such bond, or a similar bond in a lesser amount, be provided by Grantee. Grantee shall comply with this requirement within sixty days after written notice has been given by the City. Subd. 5. Local Programming Obligations. Grantee shall expend at least 1% of its annual Gross Revenues each fiscal year in fulfilling its Local Programming Obligations under the Franchise for public, governmental, and educational access, but it shall not be obligated to expend more than that amount for such access. That .amount shall not include any costs of operation or administration not directly related to the provision of local programming. This expenditure shall be in complete satisfaction of Grantee's total Local Programming Obligations during the period of this ordinance. Sec. 6. Automatic Termination of Relief Ordinance Provisions. The provisions of this ordinance, and the relief herein granted, shall cease to be effective, automatically, upon the occurrence of the earliest of any of the following events: 5/20/85 Subdivision 1, Failure of the Grantee to complete refinancing its Existing Indebtedness by December 31, 1987, in accordance with Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 2. The end of the next month after Grantee has collected cumulative Gross Revenues in the amount of one hundred million dollars as measured from September 1, 1984. The determination of cumulative Gross Revenues shall be based upon audited financial statements for periods for which they are available and upon Grantee's operating reports for periods for which audited statements are not then available. Grantee shall provide City with its financial statements and financial operating reports promptly after they are prepared. Subd. 3. March 1, 1992. Subd. 4. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the Existing Indebtedness, except through refinancing as provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 5. Payment, discharge, or satisfaction of the indebtedness arising from the refinancing provided in Article II, Section 4 of the Franchise. Subd. 6. Failure of the Grantee to restore or replace the full required amount of the Letter of Credit as provided in Article VIII, Section 4, paragraph H of the Franchise. Subd. 7. Failure of the Grantee to pay the fees as required in Section 5, Subd. 2 of this ordinance. Subd. 8. Failure of the Grantee to restore, replace or increase either a Letter of Credit or bond within sixty days of written notice by the City, as provided in Section 5, Subdivisions 3 and 4 of this ordinance. Subd. 9. A holding or determination by any court or agency that any term, condition or provision of this Relief Ordinance is invalid or unenforceable, as a result of any action taken by Grantee or any one acting on Grantee's behalf seeking such determination. Subd. 10. Sale or transfer.of all or substantially all of the System to a person or entity other than a parent, subsidiary, related corporation, affiliated corporation, partner or joint venturer of Grantee or any parent of Grantee. Subd. 11. Termination of the Franchise. Sec. 7. Other Terminations. This ordinance may also be terminated for cause, under the same procedures for termination as are contained in the Franchise, for the following reasons: Subdivision 1. All grounds for termination provided in the Franchise, except to the extent that Grantee's performance obligations are modified in this ordinance. Subd. 2. The purchase by Grantee, its general partner, or any parent, sub- sidiary, affiliate or other related corporation of Grantee or its general partner, of a cable communications system of any part thereof or interest therein, located within the seven - county metropolitan area as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.121, Subd. 2. For this purpose, the definition of a cable communications system shall be as that term is currently defined by the Board. Such a purchase shall not be grounds for termination of this ordinance; however, if the Grantee demonstrates to the reasonable satisfaction of the City that the purchase (1) will not impair the operating cash flow or financial position of Grantee and (2) will involve independent financing of the purchase without resort to the assets of the System. Subd. 3. Failure of the Grantee to comply with any of the provisions . of the Performance Agreement. Sec. 8. Requests for Further Relief. No request by the Grantee for any further relief from the requirements of the Franchise, including a request for an extension of the term of this ordinance, shall be considered by the City unless that request is made in writing prior to September 1, 1990. The City shall have no obligation whatsoever to con- sider or grant any such request, and any response to such request shall be at the sole discretion of the City. Sec. 9. Acceptance of This Relief Ordinance; Providing of Guarantees. This ordinance shall be effective in accordance with the provisions of Article XIV of the Franchise including delivery to the City of the acceptance, opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said Article XIV; provided further, however, that it shall become effective only if all of the Other Cities adopt an ordinance similar to this ordinance within 90 days after adoption of this ordinance. Also, this ordinance shall not become effective until Grantee, City, SWSCC and the Other Cities have executed and delivered the Performance Agreement and contractual documents attached thereto as exhibits. 5/20/85 Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner,Courtney Ordinance adopted. Attest: City Clerk City Mayor PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH ROGERS CABLESYSTEMS APPROVED. Member Bredesen intro- duced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RRgnT TTTTON BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager be and they are hereby directed and authorized to execute a Performance Agreement between Rogers Cable- Systems of Minnesota Limited Partnership, Rogers U. S: Cablesystems, Inc., the City of Edina and the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager, upon their approval thereof, be authorized to also execute Exhibit A - Contract for Local Programming Facilities and Exhibit B - Contract for Public, Educational and Government Access Service. ADOPTED this 20th day of May, 1985. Motion for adoption of this resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 812 -A2 (REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF RADIO AND TELE- VISION ANTENNAS, EXTERIOR DISH ANTENNAS, AND SUPPORTING TOWERS) DISCUSSED AND CONTINUED TO JUNE 3, 1985. Mr. Rosland reminded Council that at the last meeting this ordinance and considered amendments were discussed. This discussion was centered around setbacks for dish antennas. The ordinance, as written, requires antennas to maintain the same setbacks required for accessory buildings, which are five feet from the interior side and five feet from the rear property line. Mr. Rosland reported that if the Council should desire to increase the required setbacks, staff would recommend a ten -foot interior side yard setback and a 25 -foot rear yard setback, which are the setback requirements for principal structures in the Zoning Ordinance. Member Turner supports the original ordinance; she felt that if there were more stringent setbacks for the dishes, it treats them differently than other similar kinds of accessory items that we allow in yards. Member Bredesen supports the ordinance as requiring antennas to maintain the same setbacks required for accessory buildings. (At this point, Member Richards returned.) Planner Larsen commented that at the present time the City is having trouble restricting antennas' location on property; it is difficult to keep them off the rooftops. Member Richards would support making the ordinance altogether more restrictive. There being no further discussion, Member Richards' motion to continue discussion of Ordinance No. 812 -A2 to June 3, 1985 was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Courtney Nays: Kelly, Turner Motion carried. RESOLUTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF $12,000,000 HOSPITAL SYSTEM REVENUE BONDS ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland explained that the City has been working with Fairview Community Hospitals regarding strengthening the Paramedic Program and Emergency Medical Services. Fairview wants to continue to work with the City of Edina in any way that they can to expand the relationship. Council Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO HEALTH CARE REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1985A (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS PROJECT) AND A BANK REVENUE BOND, SERIES 1985A (FAIRVIEW COMMUNITY HOSPITALS PROJECT); AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE THEREOF PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 474, AS AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXE- CUTION AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Recitals. 1.01. General Authority. The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 474, as amended (the Act), to issue its revenue bonds to finance projects consistin` 5/20/85 of properties used and useful in connection with a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not operated for profit, engaged in providing health care services, including, without limitation, hospitals, nursing homes and related medical facilities. 1.02. Proposed Project and Bonds. Fairview Community Hospitals (Fairview), a Minnesota non - profit corporation which owns and operates an acute care hospital in the City known as Fairview Southdale Hospital (the Hospital), has proposed that the City, acting under and pursuant to the Act, issue and sell its Health Care Revenue Bonds, Series 1985A (Fairview Community Hospitals Project) (the Program Bonds) for the purpose of defraying the costs of a project (the Project) consisting generally of the acquisition and installation of items of equipment in the Hospital and the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness of Fairview incurred in the acquisition or betterment of the Hospital. 1.03. Prior Authority. On April 15, 1985, this Council adopted a resolution giving preliminary approval to the financing of the Project and authorizing pre- paration of necessary documents. 1.04. Documentation. Forms of the following documents relating to the financing of the Project have been prepared and submitted to this City and are hereby directed to be filed with the City Clerk: (a) An Agreement (the Agreement) between the City and Fairview pursuant to which the City will loan the proceeds of the Bonds to Fairview and Fairview agrees to complete the Project and make payments sufficient to pay the principal of, pre- mium, if any, and interest on the Bonds (as hereinafter defined) as the same be- come due and payable; (b) An Indenture of Trust (the Indenture) between the City and Mellon Bank, N. A., as trustee (the Trustee), providing for the issuance of the Bonds and for their payment; (c) A Commitment Agreement by and between Municipal Bond Insurance Association (the Insurer) and the City, pursuant to which payment of principal of and interest on the Bonds will be insured by the Insurer under an insurance policy, a surety bond and a program fee surety bond (the Commitment Agreement); (d) A Declaration of Trust by Mellon Bank, N. A. (the Declaration Trustee) under which the Program Bonds will be deposited along with the bonds of other tax - exempt issuers for the benefit of the owners of Certificates of Participation in the trust; (e) A Letter of Credit Agreement between Credit Suisse, a Swiss banking corpor- ation, acting by its New York Branch (the Bank) and the City pursuant to which a letter of credit will be issued by the Bank to the Declaration Trustee, to secure payment, under certain circumstances, of the purchase price of Certificates of Participation tendered by the owners thereof and not remarketed, and providing for the issuance by the City to the Bank of a bond (the Bank Bond) to evidence the City's obligations to the Bank (the Program Bonds and the Bank Bond are referred to as the Bonds); (f) A Letter of Credit to be issued by the Bank for the account of the City (the Letter of Credit); (g) A Guaranty by Fairview under which Fairview will guaranty to the Bank the obligation of the City under the Letter of Credit Agreement; (h) A Placement Agreement by and between the Declaration Trustee, InterHealth, a Minnesota non - profit corporation (the Servicer), the Bank and The First Boston Corporation (the Agent) (the Placement Agreement), whereby the Agent will place tendered Certificates of Participation; (i) A Tender Agent Agreement by and between the Declaration Trustee, the Bank, the Servicer and the Agent (the Tender Agent Agreement), whereby the Agent will receive any tendered Certificates of Participation; (j) A Bond Purchase Agreement by and between The First Boston Corporation (the Underwriter) and the City (the Bond Purchase Agreement), whereby the Underwriter agrees to purchase the Program Bonds from the City; (k) A Certificate Placement Agreement by and between the Underwriter and the Declaration Trustee (the Certificate Placement Agreement), whereby the Under- writer agrees to act as agent in offering the Certificates of Participation to qualified investors; and (1) A Private Placement Memorandum, whereby the Underwriter will offer the Certificates of Participation to qualified financial institutions. Section 2. Findings. It is hereby found, determined and declared that: (a) The Project, as defined herein and in the Agreement, constitutes a project authorized by the Act; (b) The Project is in the public interest and the effect thereof will be to promote the health and public welfare by the attraction, encouragement and de- velopment of hospital and medical facilities at a location which is accessible to the residents of the City; 5/20/85 (c) The Project_ is to be located within the City, at a site which is readily accessible to employees and persons seeking medical care residing within the City and surrounding area; (d) The issuance and sale of the Bonds, the loan of Program Bond proceeds for the Project, the execution and delivery by the City of the Agreement, the Inden- ture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement and the performance by the City of all covenants and agree- ments of the City contained in the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement and of all other acts and things required under the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds valid and binding special or limited obligations of the City in accordance with their terms, are authorized by the Act; (e) It is desirable that the Bonds be issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, under the provisions of which the City will grant a security interest in the Agreement and the payments thereunder to the Trustee as security for the payment of the principal, premium of, if any, and interest on the Bonds and the City has not heretofore pledged, assigned or otherwise encumbered its interest in the Agreement; (f) The payments which Fairview will be required by the Agreement to make will be sufficient to provide for prompt payment of principal of and interest on.all Bonds issued under the Indenture when due; and the Agreement also provides that Fairview is required to pay all expenses of the operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but without limitation, adequate insurance thereon; (g) Under the provisions of the Act and as provided in the Agreement and the Indenture, the Bonds are not to be payable from nor charged upon any funds of the City other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof; the City is not subject to any liability thereon and no holders of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing powers of the City to pay any of the Bonds or the interest thereon nor to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City; the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encum- brance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City except its interest in the Agreement; each Bond issued under the Indenture shall recite that the Bonds, including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues pledged to the payment thereof; and no Bond shall constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional, charter or statutory limitation; (h) The execution and delivery of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commit- ment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds will not conflict with, or constitute on the part of the City a breach of or a default under, any existing agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other instrument to which the City is subject or is a party or by which it is bound; provided that this finding is made solely for the purpose of estopping the City from denying the validity of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement or the Bonds by reason of the existence of any facts contrary to this finding; (i) No litigation is pending or, to the best knowledge of the members of this Council, threatened against the City questioning the organization or jurisdiction of the City or the right of any officer of the City to hold his or her office, or in any manner questioning the .right and power of the City to execute and deliver the Bonds, or otherwise questioning the validity of the Bonds or the execution, delivery or validity of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement or the Bond Purchase Agreement or questioning the appropriation of revenues to payment of the Bonds or the right of the City to loan the proceeds of the Bonds to Fairview; (j) All acts and things required under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota to make the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds the valid and binding special or limited obligations of the City in accordance with their terms will have been done upon adoption of this Resolution and execution of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds; provided that this finding is made solely for the purpose of estopping the City from denying the validity of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement or the Bonds by reason of the existence of any facts contrary to this finding; and (k) The City is duly organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota and is authorized to issue the Bonds in accordance with the Act. 5/20/85 Section 3. Authorization and Approval of the Project, Agreement, Indenture, Commitment Agreement, Letter of Credit Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement and Private Placement Memorandum. The forms of Agreement, Indenture, Commitment Agreement, Letter of Credit Agree- ment and Bond Purchase Agreement are approved, subject to such modifications as are deemed appropriate and consented to by the Mayor or the City Manager, which consent shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution of the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commitment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement, the Bond Purchase Agreement and the Bonds by the Mayor or the City Manager. The Mayor or the City Manager is directed to execute the Agreement, the Indenture, the Commit- ment Agreement, the Letter of Credit Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement. The Council authorizes the distribution of the Private Placement Memorandum with such variations, insertions and additions as the Mayor or the City Manager may hereafter deem appropriate by the Underwriter to prospective purchasers of the Certificates. Copies of all the documents shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The Mayor or the City Manager is also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as may be required to give effect to the transaction herein contemplated. Section 4. The Bonds; Sale and Execution. 4.01. Authorization and Sale. The City hereby authorizes the issuance of the Bonds in the principal amount not to exceed $12,000,000 in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture and this Resolution, the final,amount to be approved by the Mayor or the City Manager. _It is recognized by the City that the initial interest rate on the Program Bonds has not been determined and is not contained in the form of the Indenture. The Mayor or the City Manager is authorized to approve the initial interest rate, provided that such rate is not in exess of 10% per annum. Such approval shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Mayor or the City Manager of the Indenture. The sale of the Program Bonds to the Underwriter at-a price not less than 95% of the principal amount thereof is hereby approved. 4.02. Execution. The Mayor or any acting Mayor and the City Manager or any other officer of the City, by facsimile signatures, are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture and to deliver them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this Resolution, the other documents required in the Indenture, and such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be appropriate to effect the transaction herein contemplated. 4.03. Modifications, Absence of Officers. The approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes an approval of such modifications thereto, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary and appropriate and are consented to by the Mayor and the City Manager. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence or disability of the Mayor or the City Manager, any of the documents authorized by this Resolution to be executed, may be executed by any officer of the City who, in the opinion'of the City Attorney, may execute such documents. Section 5. Authentication of Proceedings. The Mayor and the City Manager and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to furnish to the Trustee, Fairview and bond counsel certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. Section 6. Limitations of the City's Obligations. Notwithstanding anything contained in the Bonds, the Agreement, the Indenture or any other documents referred to in Section 1.04 hereof, the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation, and shall not be payable from nor charged upon any funds other than the revenue pledged to the payment thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any liability thereon, and no holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereof against any property of the City other than those rights and interest of the City under the Agreement which have been pledged to the Trustee by the Indenture, and the Bonds shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City other than those rights and interests of the City under the Agreement which have been pledged to the Trustee by the Indenture. The agreement of the City to perform 5/20/85 the covenants and other provisions contained in this Resolution, the Bonds, the Agreement or the Indenture and the other documents listed in Section 1.04 hereof shall be subject at all times to the availability of revenues sufficient to pay all costs of such performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon other than as stated above. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion.for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council Member Bredesen and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney;_ and the following voted against the same:, none; whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by-the Mayor, which signature was attested by the City Clerk. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as Pre -List dated 5/20/85: General Fund, $273,203.67; Park Department, $14.04; Art Center, $2,232.40; Swimming Pool Fund, $72.60; Golf Course Fund, $16,232.49; Recreation Center Fund, $4,457.23; Gun Range Fund, $265.34; Utility Fund, $36,657.02; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $90,592.81; Construction Fund, $3,632.47; IMP Bond Redemption Fund, $13,218.00; IMP Bond Redemption #2, $150.00; Total, $440,728.07; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 4/30/85: General Fund, $115,177.05; Park Fund, $2,002.08; Art Center, $878.09; Swimming Pool Fund, $2,941.33; Golf Course Fund, $3,520..52; Recreation Center Fund, $8,173.49; Gun Range Fund, $375.04; Utility Fund, $19,891.20; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $226,101.21; Total, $379,060.55. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:00 P. M. Acting City Clerk r A- 6953 Southdale Road Edina, Mn. 55435 9 June 1985 Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Mn. 55435 Dear Mr. Hoffman: My comments /suggestions are in regard to the Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -8 S.A.P. 120- 145 -15. A previous commitment prevents me from attending the hearing scheduled for Monday, June 17, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. I do not understand why the Traffic Control Signal System at West 70 Street and Cornelia Drive is considered to be an "improvement ". It appears to me to be a traffic control device as well as a safety measure for pedestrians. I see absolutely no reason why the project should be funded by the School District or by Special Assessment of the neighborhood. The intersection is utilized by countless people and vehicles traveling east and west on 70 Street that have absolutely nothing to do with the School District or the neighborhood. The project should be funded entirely by the City General Fund. In your Notice of Public Hearing you make mention to the City tree trimming assessment process. I have been a resident at 6953 Southdale Road for nearly 8 years. I have written to the Mayor and called the Forester in an attempt to get the trees trimmed that are on city property in front and at the rear of our property. The trees have not been trimmed. In fact, I was told by the Forester that the trees in the 30+ year -old development have probably never been trimmed. Prior to moving to Edina we lived in Richfield. The trees in Richfield were and still are trimmed on a regular basis without a request and without an assessment process. Sincerely, .Yohn P. Davis jd cc: N. Atchison, School Board Chairperson .P. Kohler, Neighborhood Signal Committee Chairperson I -� June 9, 1985 Edina city council Subject: Improvement # P -85 -8 (Traffic light at 70th & Cornelia) I strongly disagree with the neighborhood assessment alternative for funding this project. There clearly must be something done to improve the traffic situation on 70th St. which was caused by the traffic rerouting as a result of closing 66th St. exit on H 100 and putting an exchange on 70th. Installation of a traffic light hopefully will improve the flow and safety of 70th but the problem of turning 70th into a thoroughfare should still be addressed. An assessment of this type is adding insult to injury. In summary, it's preposterous to consider making a neighborhood pay for solving a problem they had no say in creating and where the majority of the traffic is not local traffic but through traffic. Si nc rely Keith Lucke 4444 Andover Rd. Edina, Mn. j -A June 10, 1985 Edina city council Subject: Improvement # P -85 -8 (Traffic light at 70th & Cornelia) I strongly disagree with the neighborhood assessment alternative for funding this project. There clearly must be something done to improve the traffic situation on 70th St. which was caused by the traffic . rerouting as a result of closing 66th St. exit on H 100 and putting an exchange on 70th. Installation of a traffic light hopef ul l y will improve the flow and safety of 70th but the problem of turning 70th into a thoroughfare should still be addressed. An assessment of this type is adding insult to injury. In summary, it's preposterous to consider making a neighborhood pay for solving a problem they had no say in creating and where the majority of the traffic is not local traffic but through traffic. Sincerely KVd''& Lee Me i I I e 4421 70th St. Edina, Mn. ITi � T0: F. J. Hoffman r FROM: Steve F. Marc RE: 70th & Cornelia Signal I am in favor of a "Traffic Control" at the above intersection. I feel the city should pick up the cost since they approved the interchange at Highway 100 and 70th which in turn made 70th Street a "$Lghway." Because of the traffic on 70th and the problems it has caused the neighborhood, I feel, my assessment for tax purposes should be lowered as it has affected my property value. My taxes have gone up even though the area is not as attractive as it once was because of the heavy use of 70th. Adjustments should be made to lower taxes rather than to place a $42.00 assessment on home owners. The city caused the problem and hopefully they should resolve it within the city budget structure. Thank you. 6 -14 -s5 gn 7108 Wooddale Avenue Edina, MN 55435 June 13, 1985 Mr. Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -8 S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15 Dear Mr. Hoffman: y k I wish to voice my objection to the manner in which the City of Edina intends to collect the funds needed to pay for the proposed Traffic Control Signal at West 70th Street and Cornelia Drive. Of the three proposed alternatives for funding the project, A and B are more acceptable than C. As you may recall, the area east of France Avenue was originally zoned residential, and after several meetings with Edina officals it was zoned commercial. The reason for the increased traffic on West 70th Street, and therefore the need fora traffic control signal is the existence of the commercial area. Therefor4 it seems only fair that the merchants of the area, who are benefiting from the traffic, pay for the improvement with a special assessment levied upon them. The project does not qualify as an improvement in my eyes. It is a necessity created by the existence of the large nearby shopping area. Personally, I will not benefit from a Traffic Control Signal at that intersection and do not want to pay for one. ours very truly, A Pa J. McGoug , J 4512 W. 70th Street Edina, MN 55435 June 11, 1985 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Rosland: Because of a long scheduled vacation, I am unable to attend the June 17, 1985 council meeting. At the January 21, 1985 council meeting, a consensus was reached on Mr. IFausch's recommendtions for improving safety on 70th Street. The council, its consultant and all three factions of our committee agreed upon the ten recommendations listed in the book titled: West 70th Street Traffic Operations and Safety Study. Mrs. Kelly's motion to accept and implement the consultant's recommendations was carried unanimously. The June 17, 1985 meeting focuses on the funding of proposal Number 3, the traffic control signal. Providing a safe environment for its citizens is the primary domain and duty of a city government. Funding for this signal is clearly a city matter and should be addressed as such. A special tax assessment is not warranted since the funds are available in the city's current personnel budget. The time for any squabbling ended in the passage of Mrs. Kelly's motion on January 21, 1985. We are all honorable people who came to an agreement on that evening. I urge you to adhere to the letter and to the spirit of our agreement. Please pursue vigorously the implementation of all the recommendations without even an appearance of delay. Thank you`, Phyllis M. Kohler FOR G2�DI`:G OF VAN VALKE \BtRG PARK. mr'. Rosland presented tabulation of /Ujfs, y� le�J ,icls trom three companies for the final grading of land between Van Valkenburg Par - and Grandview Cemetery: 1) Veit and Company, Inc., °4000 Veit Place, Rogers, Gontracting, $9,140.00; 2) Buesing Brothers Trucking, Long Lake, MN, $9,400.00; 3) G. Inc., Hopkins, MN, $9,500.00. Staff recommended the low bid, which is within the amount budgeted, of $9,140.00 by Veit and Company, Inc. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to the low bidder, Veit and Company, Inc. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR 1985 TREATMENT FOR INDIANHEAD LAKE. Mr. Rosland presented the othe bid for the Indianhead Lake treatment. The bid was in the amount of $5,481, amount budgeted for the purchase, and it was quoted by Clean -Flo Laboratories, Inc. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Richards for award of this bid to Clean - Flo Laboratories, Inc. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. cno DV"DT nrF11FNT nF ROOF ON THE SWIMMING POOL BATH HOUSE. Mr. Rosland pre- sented quotations of bids from two companies bathhouse: 1) Keho Construction, $9,900.00; $16,779.00. Staff recommended the low bid of within the amount budgeted for the purchase. Member Richards for award of this bid to Keho Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. to replace the roof on the swimming pool 2) Falls and Nyhusmoen Construction, $9,990.00 by Keho Construction, which is Member Turner's motion was seconded by Construction. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JANUARY 15, 1985, APPROVED. Member Richards' motion to accept the reports in the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of January 15, 1985, with no formal action was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. WEST 70TH STREET REPORT PRESENTED. Mr. Hoffman introduced Mr. Peter Fausch, Vice President of Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc., the consulting engineering firm commissioned by the City of Edina in October of 1984 to study the traffic operations and safety characteristics of West 70th Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue. Mr. Fausch explained that the study considered exsiting traffic volumes, speeds, accidents, delays, pedestrian crossing problems, school traffic and stop sign compliance. This study was instigated because the growth in traffic on 70th Street had created some difficult conflicts between the through traffic served by 70th Street and the residential areas along and served by 70th Street. The level of traffic on 70th Street leaves few gaps in through traffic for safe and convenient entering of side street traffic. Yet, the existing 4 -way stop at Cornelia Drive which interrupt the pthrough otraffic, especially drivers. for school related crossings, is not observed by up s These conflicts have generated a number of requests by the neighborhood areas along e and speed of traffic 70th Street for actions to increase safety and reduce the volum along 70th Street. Mr. Fausch presented the following recommendations: 1) The City of Edina should carefully review and consider the functional classification or role that West 70th Street performs in the City of Edina street system; 2) Assuming the functional classification of West 70th Street is to remain a collector street (no more than 14,000 vehicles per day), it is recommended that West 70th Street be striped as a two lane roadway consistent with the standard operating capabilities of a 40 -foot wide street. Within the striping plan, left turn lanes, improved stop lines and crosswalklearkiews should be provided at West Shore Drive, Wooddale Avenue, Cornelia Drive, y Road and France Avenue; 3) Install a traffic actuated, traffic control signaldwith pedestrian (walk /don't walk) indications at Cornelia Drive. This system provide for pedestrian activation of the signals for use in crossing West 70th Street to Cornelia Elementary School or other pedestrian /bicycle destinations; and 4) Upgrade warning signs on West 70th Street,.including pavement width transition signs at Highway 100, lane control signs at all intersections to be provided with left turn lanes, stop lines and crosswalks at West Shore Drive. With these recommendations acted upon, Mr. Fausch pointed out that the following characteristics would probably be created: a) Stop sign compliance and crossing safety will be improved at Cornelia Drive; due b) Midblock speeds on 70th Street will.be reduced slightly peak to striping and metering; c) Entering and crossing will be improved at West Shore Drive and Wooddale through gaps created at downstream traffic signals; d) Annual signal maintenance costs will increase; e) Accidents will probably remain about the same at all intersections; f) The street operation will be more consvolumeswwilltprobablycter- istics of a collector street classification; and g) continue to increase in relationship to the delay on 70th Street versus planned improve and Valley View Road between the Crosstown and I -494. Mr. Fausch ments to France Avenue d review by a Study Advisory reported that his study has received much input an Committee, consisting of: Mr. Robert Burnett, Principal of Cornelia School; `Ir. Paul Johnson, 7108 Glouchester Avenue; Mr. Donald Barck, 4807 [Jest 70th Street; Ms. Sandy Phillips, 6817 Point Drive; sir. Harold Babb, 4701 West 70th Street; ?Ir. Gary Ms- Patti 7004 Bristol Boulevard; "Is. Phyllis Kohler, 4512 West 70th Street; Patti Watson, 4424 West 70th Street; Jess & Helaine Cohen, 4405 Dunham Drive. 1/21/85 _ f tir. Harold Babb, 41701 West 70th Street, said "one must pay the price to live on 70th Street." He strongly encouraged the adoption of the consultant's presentation without a temporary stop sign at West Shore Drive. Ms. Sandy Phillips, 6817 Point Drive, pr -- sented a letter from a Cornelia teacher which stated that the corner at West 70th < Cornelia is always dangerous but especially in the spring when there are bike riders. The teacher supported traffic signalization at this corner. Jess & Helaine Cohen, 4405 Dunham Drive, spoke up in support of installing a stop sign as soon as possible at the corner of 70th Street and [Jest Shore Drive to see if this eliminates some of the Problems. This concept was not within the consultant's report. With no further discussion, Member Kelly's motion to accept and implement the �reco;mendations ��em the consultant, M 71- no temporary ion s n at es Aye conded by r Turn E es: a s ar s, Turner, Courtney Motion car BOARD/ COrff•fISSION APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney explained that there are various Boards or Commissions on which there are still vacancies to be filled. He asked the Council members to submit to him names _of persons recommended for the following positions, so that the appointments can be made at the Council Meeting of February 4: Board of Appeals and Adjustments, 3 -year term; Human Relations Commission, 3 -year term; Heritage Preservation Board, 2 -year term; Advisory Board of Health, 2 -year term; South Hennepin Human Services Council. There was no further discussion. APPOINTMENT TO STATE CHS ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPROVED. Mayor C ourtney explained that the Edina Advisory Board of Health has recommended Dr. Drive to be appointed to the State CHS Advisory Committee as representative from Edina. Mayor Courtney is also recommending that Dr. Aadalen be appointed to the Edina Advisory Board of Health when those appointments are made in February. Member Kelly's motion that Dr. Sharon Aadalen's appointment to the State CHS Advisory Committee and the Edina Advisory Board of Health be approved was seconded by-Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET FOR PROPOSED TREE TRIMMING PROJECT. Mr. Rosland reported on the Tree Trimming Project, P- TT -03, for the boulevard trees in the northwest quadrant of the City with assessment to the home owners. The exact location of this project is the area bounded by Crosstown Highway to the northern boundary line and from Highway 100 to the western boundary line (County Road 18). The estimated cost per tree is'$60; the total number of trees to be trimmed is 1604. The total cost of the project would be $96,240. This would be an assessed project to the homeowners with an assessment only for trees trimmed. As recommended, Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -TT -03 1. The Park Director, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of Public Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 4, 1985, at 7:00 P. M. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improv- -nt 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, plac and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in sub- stantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO., P -TT -03 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, March 4, 1985, at 7:00 P. M. to consider the following proposed tree trimming project to be done under the authority granted by the Minnesota Statutes, Chap -ter 59, 1983 Session. Law. The approximate cost of said project is estimated by the City as set forth below: Estimated Cost 1604 trees x $60 $96,240 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the project P -TT -03 includes: An area bounded by Crosstown Highway on the South, the Northern Boundary line on the North, Highway 100 on the East and the Western Boundary Line (County Road 18) on the West. Marcella M. Daehn Motion for aaoption of the resolution was secondedybylMember Kelly. A Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution'adopted. , T14 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P -85 -8 . S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 17, 1985 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: WEST 70TH STREET AT CORNELIA DRIVE ESTIMATED COST TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P -85 -8 S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15 $70,000.00 This hearing has been called as a result of a traffic safety study conducted by a consultant for the City. One recommendation was to signalize the 70th and Cornelia Drive intersection to enhance pedestrian safety in the neighbor- hood adjacent to the school and park. The signal installation is eligible for fifty percent funding from state aid funding sources. The remaining fifty percent or $35,000.00 requires a local funding source. The possible sources of local funding are the City General Fund, School District or Special Assessment to the neighborhood. This project is a neighborhood safety improvement similar in scope to the City Tree Trimm- ing assessment process. The three proposed alternatives for funding the local share of the project are as follows: A. City General Fund - No neighborhood assessment (This is not normal City policy on improvement projects). B. City General Funds and School District Funds - Fifty percent funding by each agency. (This would be establishing a new capital joint funding policy). C. Special Assessment of Neighborhood - This would result in an estimated assessment of $42.00 per single family residence. (This method of financing local share is normally used in major improvement projects). Obviously, City Council could use any combination of the three alternatives listed above to finance the local share cost. The construction of this project, if approved, is proposed to occur in the fall of 1985. If a portion of this project is assessed, the assessments would be levied in 1986 with the assessment payable in 1987. The area that may be assessed is bounded approximately by West Shore Drive on the west, West 66th Street on the north, Valley View Road and Lynmar Lane on the east, and Gilford Drive on the south. Page 2 of 2 Pages City of Edina Notice of Public Hearing Traffic Control Signal System Improvement No. P -85 -8 S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15 Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Thank you. Francis J ofYn, E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer FJH:lm June 7, 1985 WAR DWELL ` :` LEWIS PgRK ILL 10- . \ .'..; . DR •' I '• t. ��: �1 - .p�.'Y f1 L .fi S .l ;•'�.� :may., jF'�y ULMOM I jm:#*15i7 DO®R a s�• i i t J r z. v-� Y i. • -rr•• •; 1pw�7f iii. }�• ��; 6: Y, NUMBER Z -84 -4 Brutger Co. M L O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT .•4 }.�y� -y..' Ifs . :•ys� =,'!.s ! ,' =Q w�A�i�, Ll•< �J.,�•T4f' .`l'_i�X.M� -fll.. �t.i� D K. 1..r c �QD ✓.- � �' eI�Y + is mk :'b.• = ♦ - 1, •'L ',.r � ITC � �,•.. Jk n / y+, ,t •f �. f f �.! •+ �'. L O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets completed a successful season with a record of 34 wins, 4 Nsses and 4 ties; and WHAS, the Edicia Midgets was the runner -up team in the Internationaf'Si/tolthe Stick Tourn ent. at Sarnia, Ontario, being the first time an American team wen finals; and WHEREAS, uccess has come to the members of the team because of thei extraordinary ability, h urs of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as epresentatives of the City of Edina, the members of a team exemplified the highest s ndards of athletic proficiency and good sportsm ship; NOW, THEREFORE, E IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Cit of Edina, on behalf of the citizenry s a whole, that the Edina Midget White A„ ckey Team be publicly commended for thei outstanding accomplishments; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLV that a copy of this resolution b. entered into the Minutes Book of the City Counc and that copies be presented the members of the team: Sean Collins, Matt Crow, Kirk Dulac, Doug Evensor� Mark Feese, Jim Genung, Ted Hoffman, Erik Johnson, Sea Kearney, Pat McCarthy, ohn McCoy, Rob Morris, Doug Mostrom, Peter Perry, Dan Pe rson, Jim Turner a• Todd Willson, to Coaches Hal Tearse and John Turner and to am Managers Ja ' Genung and Jerry Kearney. ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1 5. Copies of the resolution were then resente ' personally to the team captains and each member of the team who was pres t a I to the coaches. Member Turner commented that this was an exceptional fine group f young men who are a credit to Edina on . and off the ice and that they and the' p ents join in thanking the Edina Hockey Association and Mr. Kojetin and his aff 1 aking these programs possible. MARK BERNHARDSON COMMENDED FOR OSTANDING JOB A ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland advised that Mark Bernhardson, ssistant City Mana r, has tendered his resignation and has accepted the positio of City Administrator i Orono\ea Minnesota. He recalled that Mr. Bernhardson came the.City in July of 1977 een his assistant since he was appointed a ity Manager in October of tMr. Rosland stated that Mr. Bernhardson h been a very helpful and stront Manager, and that although the City sta was sorry to se e him go, that ud of his accomplish- ments and thank him or his dedicated service to the Cosland presented him with a silver en bearing the City logo and wished i his new position. On behalf of th Council, Mayor Courtney expressed the in- is leaving and also extended`C eir wishes for ctirrPcc in rho f „t __ , MINUTES o the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18 1985, were ap oved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turn AyeV Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney ion carried. PRD -3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES PROPERTY GRANTED V �i7 FIRST READING (ORDINANCE N0. 825 -A3). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen, Planner, recalled that the public hearing on the Zoning Change from-R-1 to PRD -3 for the Brutger Companies property, generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road, had been continued from the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985. The request for rezoning had been heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on January 2 and January 30, 1985. The site is abutted by Dewey Hill Condominiums on the north and west and by Windwood Condominiums directly to the south. Mr. Larsen stated that according to the City's Comprehensive Plan of 1980 the site is desig- nated as suitable for medium density residential and this is in the range of 6 to 12 dwelling units per acre. The proponent, Brutger Companies, is requesting a rezoning from the existing R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Resi- dential District and have submitted a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven individual buildings. Each individual building would contain either 4, 6 or 8 units. This would result in an overall density for the site of 9.73 dwelling units per acre on the 5.14 acre fr- 4/1/85 site. The plan proposes to mix traditional townhouse style of units (living space for one family on two different floors) with a condominium style unit where all i the living space will be on one floor. Individual units, whether townhouse or condominium, will contain between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet of living area. The townhouse units will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit'and the condo - minium units will provide parking at a ratio of 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit. All garages proposed by the site plan are attaghed. In addition to the surface parking spaces that would be provided in front of each garage stall, there are 24 surface parking spaces scattered thoughout the -site. All buildings are 2 -story in design and the exterior treatment would be brick and cedar siding with asphalt shingles. Mr. Larsen advised that the staff report of January 30 recommended approval of the project. However, by a 6 to 3 vote the Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed plan. He noted that Steve Wilson of the Brutger Companies was present to explain the proposed project further. Mr. Wilson stated that the Brutger Com- panies is a development corporation specializing in multi - family housing. He then outlined some of the steps they had taken in the selection of this type of project as the best and highest use for the subject property. He pointed out that the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Housing Element, identifies a second theme as the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choices available in the City and to offer a wide range of market rate residential housing _. _. choices. Mr. Wilson stated that they had worked closely with City staff to meet the goal under the Plan's Land Use Element of encouraging excellence in site plan- ing, building materials and design. The Plan also states that vacant lands in the Cahill and 70th Street area are generally characterized by severe environmental limitations such as slopes or poor soils and multiple residential or clustered - housing presents- -the most logical means of land utilization. Mr. Wilson pointed _ - out that the proposed project uses the cluster housing concept to utilize the existing topography. They also looked at the City's 1980 Land Use Plan which shows two primary areas within the City that have a medium density land use designation. Within those areas they had found a mixture of apartments, townhouses and condo - miums projects which had been constructed and had selected the clustered housing - concept which has been well received in the housing market. Mr. Wilson added that they had considered the requirements.established by the Zoning Ordinance as to density and setbacks and that the proposed project is well within those guidelines. In summary he stated that the project will be highly marketable, that it is a quality product and will have amenities that are appealing to the people who are going to buy the units. Tom Hunt, Carlson Mjorud Architecture, architect for the project, then outlined the architectural elements of the project: 1) exterior to be of brick and cedar, compatible with the surrounding area, 2) buildings would be sited to create a park -like setting, 3) the footprint of the buildings would pro- vide interest by use of jogs, 4) the buildings would have an animated roofscape, and 5) landscaping would include flowering trees /shrubs to add color and interest, with the vegetation to interface with surrounding property. Mr. Wilson then responded to general questions from the audience. He clarified that the units will be owner occupied, not rental, and will be designed for several types of marketing; that the one - level, first floor units will be geared primarily for the elderly, ' the.-one-level, second floor units would appeal to the young professionals, and the 2 -story townhouse units would appeal to the young professional couples but will not necessarily be geared to families; and that the questions of pets would be a decision to be made by the association which will be formed. He added that the setbacks requirements are 20 foot sideyard, 35 foot rear yard and 35 foot front yard. Buildings will be sited at angles to eliminate a tunnel look. City ordi- nance requires that garbage cans must be in an enclosure or building and will not be seen from surrounding properties. The units are proposed to be priced from a minimum of $95,000/100,000 to a maximum of $135,000/140,000. Bob Gunderson, 6550 York Avenue, addressed some of the issues that were raised at the Planning Commission meeting with regard to density, integrity of neighborhood, quality of structure, design and landscaping. In summary, he stated that the site has unique Possibilities and that the proposed development was designed for this particular site to meet the demand and needs of people who are looking to shift residences or move into Edina; that the proposed project responds to the Comprehensive Plan, meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements and follows the precedent established by other approved developments in Edina. Mr. Wilson then responded to general ques- tions of the Council regarding comparision of price range of the proposed units with adjacent properties, exterior materials, windows, and lot coverage. Melvin Gittleman stated he was the developer of Dewey Hill Condomiums, East and West and of the proposed South building. He stated that he objected to the proposed develop- ment for these reasons: 1) the development will be out of scale to the surround- ing area because the site has existing three -story buildings on three sides, 2) the density is too high, 3) lot coverage not compatible with adjacent develop- ments. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Homeowners Association, advised that 30% of the members of the Association are opposed to the proposed development and that at its February meeting Windwood's Board of Directors had voted unanimously -4j ij OD to go on record in opposition. He summarized the concerns of the Windwood resi- dents as follows: 1) the ratio of "covered" land to green area is too high, 2) increased traffic in the area, 3) detrimental effect to Windwood residents by addition of a two -story structure so close to the property line, 4) development would not be in keeping with "flavor" of neighborhood, and 5) concern for wildlife of the area. Also speaking in opposition to the proposed development were Alvyn Pope, 5601 Dewey Hill Road #210. Harley Peet, 5501 Dewey Hill Road #324; William Harrison, 7510 Cahill Road, and Albert Levin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A3 as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) final zoning is conditioned on final plat, 2) developer's agreement, 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) approval of landscaping plan. Member Turner stated she supported the rezoning because it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan both in terms of widening the range of housing choices and the medium density land use designation and that it meets the requirements of PRD -3 zoning. She pointed out two concerns that should be addressed before Second Reading: 1) landscaping to protect surrounding properties and 2) concern for increased traffic.. Motion for granting First Reading.was seconded by Member Kelly. Member Richards stated he would support the motion if the proposed development were reduced in density not to exceed 44 units total for the site. Member Bredesen commented that he would support an effort to reduce the density to 44 units but that his biggest concern was that a landscaping plan should be submitted that would show mature plantings and a heavily landscaped site. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards First Reading granted. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO ^:'825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS': Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the .City is amended by,adding the following thereto: "The extent of'the Planned Residence District {Sub- District PRD -3) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet,.pf the North 30 acres of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Tow_n,ship 116, Range 21, He County, Minnesota, according to the ..U.S. Government Survey." . Sec. 2.. This ordinance shall be in.ull force and effect upon its passage and publication.% PSR- 4 ADINED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING FOR WOODHAVEN GRANTED FIRST READ- ING (ORDINANCE° -iii, 825 -A4): Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk, approved and-ordere "-l1 ced'on� file. Gordon Hughes, City Planner, presented the request for zoning change m R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned Senior Residence DistrictoQ_ haven, generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard, west of SummitAvenue a rth of Vernon Avenue. The subject property measures 32,500 square.,leet in 'area and' composed of three developed single family lots. He recafled that Council had.a owed a rezoning to PRD -3 District for this property gri March 19, 1984, for continu on of a townhouse project that had started at the corner of Summit Avenue and Intef"i'ac en Blvd. Five of the units were constructed and a rezoning was approved for 8 more u s to be constructed on the subject property. This project did not receive a final p approval although it was rezoned and construction has not and apparently will not ence. Mr. Hughes stated that the property has now been optioned by Westminster Corpora * on for the purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster, who op&Xates under the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis /St. Paul, is working.with a group of Edina churches who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. It will be funded by the HUD 202 Program and the project will be identical to South Haven nl r7-1 ❑ -. --, �,. .7 �'., rl. - - .lnnnnnc TIP thn COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 29, 1985 Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -39 Planned Residential District S -85 -5 Foster Green Addition Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road Refer to: Attached Final Development plans and Preliminary Plat A preliminary development plan was considered and approved by the City Council on April 1, 1985. The proponents have now submitted an overall development plan in support of their request for final.zoning approval. A preliminary plat for the property has also been submitted. The overall development plan includes a site plan, grading plan preliminary utility layout, elevations, landscaping plan and schedule as required by Ordinance. At the time of preliminary approval, members of the Council stated that the landscaping plan should provide screening for surrounding properties and that the plan include mature stock in greater than minimum numbers. The Zoning Ordinance requirement for this site is 50 overstory trees and a full compliment of understory trees and shrubs. Overstory trees must be 2z inches in diameter for deciduous trees and 6 feet in height for coniferous trees. The proponents have submitted a landscape plan and schedule which illustrate a total of 118 overstory trees, 39 of which exceed minimum Ordinance requirements. The plan . also includes 47 understory trees and a variety of shrubs. Exterior elevations show brick and cedar siding with asphalt roofing. Most ground floor wall.areas would be brick with dormers and second floor walls of cedar siding. ..Recommendation: -The proponents have submitted plans which conform to Ordinance requirements and which respond to concerns raised at preliminary approval. The landscape plan, although not as lavish as Dewey Hill, is significantly above Zoning Ordinance minimums. The plan gives attention to perimeter screening as well as providing a well landscaped site. The plan does rely on existing material along the northerly boundary. Staff recommends final zoning and preliminary plat approval, conditioned on the following: 1. Final platting 2. Subdivision dedication 3. Developers agreement COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JANUARY 30, 1985 Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to y PRD -3, Planned Residential District Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road Refer to: Attached plans The subject request was heard by the Commission at its January 2, 1985, meeting. the request was tabled pending submission of revised plans by the developer. The proponent has returned with a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on the 5.14 acre site. There are seven building's containing between four and eight units. Townhouse and condominium units are mixed in all but the four -unit building which is all townhouses. The proposal complies with all requirements of the PRD -3 district. The revised site plan differs significantly from the initial submital. Total unit count has been reduced from 60 to 50 which reduces the density to 9.73 dwelling units per acre. Building coverage which was 29.2 percent has been reduced to 21.25 percent. Enclosed parking is provided at a ratio of two per townhouse and 1.5 per condominium unit. The plan also illustrates 24 surface parking spaces. The proposed floor plans exceed zoning ordinance size minimums for two and three bedroom units. The exterior treatment of brick with lap siding remains from the original proposal. However, all units are now proposed at two stories. Units with tuck -under garages are no longer proposed. RECOMMENDATION Staff believes that the proponents have submitted a plan that responds well to our criticism of the original plan. 'The crowding of the site, which was our main ' criticism of the first plan, has been greatly reduced. The new plan provides improved spacing between buildings and allows a more open feeling for the project. The new site plan also reduces the amount of black top on the site, .provides guest parking throughout the site, and improves site access for emergency vehicles. Staff recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to PRD -3 with the following conditions: 1. Final zoning is conditioned on final plat. 2. Developer's agreement. 3. Subdivision dedication. OO 7.7 pf i , — 1 -. ... I a M IN i RY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY FOR 01 BOUNDABRUTGER COMPANY, INC. 40DZ dw ;=27; 8 ------------ ----- ------ :jam � ''., �I a•. � � '� I � c> � flau-Nous suR FACE- S.4 11 SL K, [1 1114 we Z: OD ...... .............. .... ... .......... 44& FT. r 4 II Unit A Unit B Unit C L... LsrN L— L-M e,� � ;f= Q 1�� SHADE TREE 0 SMALL FLOWERHO TREE CONFEROUS TREE OECCUOUS SHILS efl EVERGFIEEN SHRLO FLOWOWGXXM COVER LAYM Eu PLANT SCHEDULE cmm a lath nom Sim I nxt ro ks 74 u; - OVrkOr t!1 � f Q , I I ` Ir , I I � II I Ir.. so I! C gLOcK - - r— - - - - - - - - - - - - - Li i.1 0 - _�_. V .i r Al Lki AV r ,•p � ..pct 1 I ; � I I d g _OOK _ere PRELIMINARY PLAT OF FOSTER GREEN ADDITION ..• 11.•r1 N. I.. 1.iw1• 1• . .,. i�. rl N i U � w ka . m1 wN Yry w ti y...n wNr�wYw •W.wwN • 11 ..•1.11 w�:r.. river. w. �� W,Y1 w1w•w. y Nt1 .wr.w wu�r1. . r..r. r Ir � Iw. w.. I ►•1 w. 11 r Yi1� 1y N r. Yii w. Ywy . u.w Ir.. r • r.� ,. w � .Y r. 1 no r�w.. =,L... Dyw.w 1Y.1 ra.w.s 1 w�rr � �•..� •�•• �Wrw • r w y.AALCL_ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 14, 1985 TO: -Ken Rosland FROM: Craig Larsen SUBJECT: Appeal of decision by Board of Appeals and Adjustments, B -85 -5 4528 Bruce Avenue. On May 24, 1985 we received an appeal of a deci.sion by the Board of Appeals, from Peter Mahon, relative to a request for a lot width variance for 4528 Bruce Avenue. On May 16, 1985 the Board of Appeals granted a 25 foot lot width variance for the subject property with the following conditions: 1. That a survey verifying that the lot was 50 feet in width be provided. 2. That the Heritage Preservation Board approve the plans prior to the issuance of a building permit. The first condition has been satisfied, and a copy of the survey is enclosed for your review. The Heritage Preservation Board considered the attached plans at its May 28, 1,985 meeting. The Board voted not to approve the plans presented. r EN aJill 1111I�1�� w ARgANCE NUMBER B-85 -5 Thelma R. ti1cGuiggin L O C A T 10 N 4528 Bruce Avenue, Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section. REQUEST 25 Foot Lot Width Variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS STAFF REPORT MAY 16, 1985 B -85 -5 Thelma R. McGuiggin 4528 Bruce Avenue Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District Fairway Section. REQUEST: 25 Foot Lot Width Variance REFER TO: Attached area map, house plans and survey of adjacent dwelling. The subject property is a vacant, platted 50 foot wide lot which is owned by the owner of the northerly adjacent property. The Zoning Ordinance states that a platted, non- conforming lot is not buildable without a variance if it is, or has been held in common ownership, at any time since October 22, 1951, with an adjacent parcel which, together, complied with the width, depth and lot area requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. This lot has been held in common ownership with the adjacent lot, therefore, a 25 foot lot width variance is requested to make it buildable. In support of their request, the proponents have submitted a site plan, floor plan and front elevation of a house proposed for development of the property. The proposed plan does comply with the Zoning Ordinance requirements for lot coverage, building height, and all setbacks except for the fireplace. The Ordinance allows a two foot encroachment by fireplaces provided they not exceed 10 square feet in horizontal area. The fireplace shown is approximately 12 square feet in area. The subject property is the last remaining vacant parcel on this block of Bruce Avenue. Twenty -five of 32 lots fronting on this block of Bruce are 50 feet in width, and except for the two northerly corner lots, the remainder measure 55 feet in width. The attached graphic illustrates existing, developed 50 foot lots in the.vicinity. Although there exists a variety of lot sizes within the entire Country Club area, individual sub -areas tend to be quite uniform. RECOMMENDATION: Staff supports the variance request. It would grant to this property development rights similar to that of most other properties in the vicinity. It would not alter the essential character or symmetry of the neighborhood. Our concern is that of design compatibility. Since the Country Club District is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, we wish to insure that any house constructed on this property would be compatible in size and architectural style with the established architectural pattern in the District. Therefore, we recommend approval of the variance with the condition that, prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Heritage Preservation Board approve the construction Plans, and that the fireplace be modified to conform with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Q. a' 3 o. Q; RON KRUEGER & ASSOCIATES3 INC. REGISTERED LAND SURVEYORS 7382.WASHINGTON AVENUE SO. EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55344 PHONE 812- 941.3030 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Survey for G�UST,4FSot4 A SSoG • Job No 171,5-0 1 Bk 494 Pn -71 -- /3o,44 zo SCA G EE I hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of CoT COU/VT/Zy CGU6 Q- 1.i7-P /-G -7- , E/1% County, Minnesota A/J Qom, Surveyed by ms 7 cj 1 /f 19 L� .. /l ` RON KRUEGER'& ASSOCIATES, INC. STATE REG. NO. 14374 h N j ° o .Z h s? - t„ „ P a. 'Lo_r� tb+ wta r ® �� + _°•C1 3°� ��p z �r 60 23' By 3 `O t o W qp _ p �. p -' -7M3 ,y� ' .rte' � -•�`d! ?• ' � � 3�u - 5e =e �. T f' ..r _�'• n .�.Q.. 9 c. j r �G`7 as N N = _ - n 2 .7� `4�'•!3� ..4�' � :i:4f s, 0 6b 74 lam— 1 3/ ry Qa3& E�l 3 9 �y ' , I 4 = 4 �� = 303 6 �a 11f3 - 13 �i6 ON . 5 o /4 L L O �9 I.2[ 29 z 60 h Z a. 5 tj 1;! 3 , I. w ° cs 'A Ilfll ,39.45 • 'e 5 > Z7 . '6 2B a -- �. -� - -- o 2r,, Z7* 4a -II 4 Giese _L28� • N '4o.fg h N ' 6 26 :3 W h 21` j . Z6 �E - 5 Ld��t 7 j ZS g3-S N '3. 2 _� Q _ '� 13 36 6 Q ;4 Jz % ` Z4 / /4 Z¢ o' Zf G3 /35 % Aft tmjAF a. Z3 _ ;3° 45 r a Z 3A- p Y�13 4 $ . `- - � _. - O ZZ 9 - m nI 2 :3B5 _ 13A3 S ° 14�.T• '- 173 3 1>4� /i 1 Z/ Z/ 212. ,gyp W W.TE OA -42 !1. i l!.: 4 2rd - 13 .0Q. - -1 -- -dC.d• •,:.�4 0%► ZOO G� sa C. 3za z•33r %� ! Z ka 13755 /Z _93 17.e7 %Z: m : Z` ! / ►: /5 t9 14: g a i , _ 13 4 3 3. /.5 NI / l4= C =CL:- _ % "/% s l � c 5 7o- w v les �--�- 3z/_ -- -- '� ee - -. — 334 M �__ sass 6681 LA h 0 22.5 o -5 = - _ fE NKi .a =0.9 BS . -Il�' v, o 137.44 r3� o ! Sfl;w Ta r G° Io5 Z ! SffrZ _!. OAKS 36 Z * F Z =s.ca 3 I 5 -3 ,B 4 �" 32 •F' 7 3t( jF g .� - d 20 r. - 7 8 � 73.s iv Z- zl� If Ul ; 0 5 ° ; Z -'� Z 4 OW ° - - /4 X O - __.... - W Z/ 14 /4 9 ' 6 Oi Q W rt s ! 134 —� 0 - - NV �s - Z0 _ p / to /s Q A Ix 19 W) �% 03 3`!34 I•:o ;4/.4; v - � 17 -- - t '3 .44 h Q If Z/ N 7 5 Z3 - - -.: /7. /7 N Q: a ° CIO Zzh 9 Zak 1 ', •r• !ro N -' d 7d • . -J / �=� _ .'L,t : 3:.Q;i fJ _�`.Nyo'N , Z:i L •�3•/�9 3 /4 7 -^"R .6 . rp i+ v •. _ _ �I _ o E �' 6 ^v -t. �2o� f sac�' a-p � , - •�.: ., — am 122.5 . � � % rcc ZJ l 7 v, y ` _ • L M E M O R A N D U N I DATE: May 23, 1985 TO: Heritage Preservation Board FROM: Harold Sand SUBJECT: Proposed dwelling 4528 Bruce Ave. Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District, Fairway Section, PIN 18- 028 -24 -12 -0073. Refer To: Attached B -85 -5 staff report, site plan, floor plans and front elevation. This request is for a new dwelling on a vacant lot that was previously combined with the northerly adjacent dwelling at 4526 Bruce Ave. The lot is substandard in terms of lot width and lot area, therefore variances are required to permit development. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments approved a lot width variance on May 16, 1985 subject to approval of the building plans by the Heritage Preservation Board. The proposed dwelling is designed in the English Tudor Revival Style, which is one of the most popular styles in the neighborhood. The proponent has not submitted side and rear elevations at this time so it is difficult to fully evaluate the proposal. The additional draw- ings may be submitted prior to the HPB meeting. The exterior materials on the structure should be clarified. The drawings seem to indicate a vertical wood siding on portions of the structure which would not be characteristic of the English Tudor Revival Style i The proposed dwelling also has the attached garage facing the street. The original design standards for the district required that attached garages would not face the front street. Side streets and lots that adjoin the Creek appear to be the exeptions to the rule. In addition, more recent dwellings, perhaps without design review, have attached garages facing the street. At the present time approx- imately 16 percent of the dwellings have garages facing the street. ------------ Room= I� ILi1��91 • , LOL il — dZ; MAN Poll . � � Y �. �l �i �+'I� \s ��f,y,•Y -A l ! N :l 5( .r�1Y l.Ar,�} � H TIM DWiPJ& Ram di►1£T1Y. o rx V 4t A6 RA& F- U. 2A III MAID ALCV, -RAJ hLALE ^ - --_-' _ �� �� ^ �� �� -~__-. ___ ' | , / � . � ��c _ ' ------l�, _- _ -- ' �__]� �| |/ | i/ --- --_-_ -___-- _- — ' - -_ . ' _ � � � _ AIEM I 8r2 Usl NEW ' Z -A At May 2ffl, 1985 Received 5 -24 -85 City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Council Re: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments Appeal of Decision Made 5/16/85 In Matter of B -85 -5; 25' Lot Width Variance The purpose of this letter is formally to appeal the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision to grant a 25' lot width variance in the above - referenced matter, contingent upon receipt of a new survey showing a lot at least 50' wide. This appeal requests rescission of that contingent decision and the calling of a new hearing upon completion of the required lot survey. With respect to the staff report, this appeal contends that: 1. The staff report describing the in- question lot was materially incomplete insomuch as it did not have a survey of said lot and, lacking such, relied on a 1943 survey of the adjoining lot. Significantly, the southern lot line in question was not identified on the survey filed in support of the variance request. 2. Lacking a minimum description of the lot and having building plans submitted that were not in compliance with local building code (with respect to fireplace), the staff still felt compelled to support the variance request. The staff saw no need for a new survey. 3. The drawing prepared by the staff for the Board's use in deciding the question was incorrect in showing a 7' side set -off from the existing driveway. A 2' encroachment, the existence of which is known and not contested, was not shown. For the record, it appears that the planning board's staff is making variance recommendations without requiring the minimum physical evidence. The lot in question is not wide; two -foot errors or inconsistencies are important. This appeal contends that the incomplete submission of the variance request should not have been heard by the Board. Board of Appeals - 2 - May 20, 1985 Beyond the incomplete staff report, this appeal also contends that the Board: 1. Acted precipitously in hearing the question with incomplete information. One member of the Board observed the survey inadequacy mentioned above and is on record questioning how the issue could be addressed without a proper survey. 2. Deprived interested citizens of an open forum to hear proper resolution of the question once minimum facts were provided by leaving a contingency that would not be resolved in the same forum the question was properly raised. In short, the question now will not be resolved in the open, in front of the Board, but will progress at the private dis- cretion of the builder /proponent, not offering all interested parties a chance to share the salient facts of the matter; such facts that should have been provided with the initial variance request. The Board has public trust. Nothing was gained and no valid public purpose was served in making a quick decision with materially insufficient information. The interests of only one party were served, to the detriment of the many other affected residents. This appeal requests rescission of the contingent approval and a resubmission of an acceptable variance request upon completion of the survey to identify the lot in question. If such a request must be accompanied by building plans, this appeal requests that, even though not yet approved by the Preservation Board, such plans at least meet minimum code requirements.. The plans presently filed are lacking in this respect. Finally, upon filing of acomplete variance request, a new public hearing would then afford all interested parties the right to hear the facts, a right not yet satisfied. Sincerely, 14A/U &C& Peter M. Mahon, Jr. 4530 Bruce Avenue South Edina, Minnesota . oe-10000S — C 4 May 2ffl, 1985 Received 5 -24 -85 City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Council Re: Edina Board of Appeals and Adjustments Appeal of Decision Made 5/16/85 In Matter of B -85 -5; 25' Lot Width Variance The purpose of this letter is formally to appeal the Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision to grant a 25' lot width variance in the above - referenced matter, contingent upon receipt of a new survey showing a lot at least 50' wide. This appeal requests rescission of that contingent decision and the calling of a new hearing upon completion of the required lot survey. With respect to the staff report, this appeal contends that: 1. The staff report describing the in- question lot was materially incomplete insomuch as it did not have a survey of said lot and, lacking such, relied on a 1943 survey of the adjoining lot. Significantly, the southern lot line in question was not identified on the survey filed in support of the variance request. 2. Lacking a minimum description of the lot and having building plans submitted that were not in compliance with local building code (with respect to fireplace), the staff still felt compelled to support the variance request. The staff saw no need for a new survey. 3. The drawing prepared by the staff for the Board's use in deciding the question was incorrect in showing a 7' side set -off from the existing driveway. A 2' encroachment, the existence of which is known and not contested, was not shown. For the record, it appears that the planning board's staff is making variance recommendations without requiring the minimum physical evidence. The lot in question is not wide; two -foot errors or inconsistencies are important. This appeal contends that the incomplete submission of the variance request should not have been heard by the Board. r aj Board of Appeals - 2 - May 20, 1985 Beyond the incomplete staff report, this appeal also contends that the Board: 1. Acted precipitously in hearing the question with incomplete information. One member of the Board observed the survey inadequacy mentioned above and is on record questioning how the issue could be addressed without a proper survey. 2. Deprived interested citizens of an open forum to hear proper resolution of the question once minimum facts were provided by leaving a contingency that would not be resolved in the same forum the question was properly raised. In short, the question now will not be resolved in the open, in front of.the Board, but will progress at the private dis- cretion of the builder /proponent, not offering all interested parties .a chance to share the salient facts of the matter; such facts that should have been provided with the initial variance request. The Board has public trust. Nothing was gained and no valid public purpose was served in making a quick decision with materially insufficient information. The interests of only one party were served, to the detriment of the many other affected residents. This appeal requests rescission of the contingent approval and a resubmission of an acceptable variance request upon completion of the survey to identify the lot in question.. If such a request must be accompanied by building plans, this appeal requests that, even though not yet approved by the Preservation Board, such plans at least meet minimum code requirements. The plans presently filed are lacking in this respect. Finally, upon filing of acomplete variance request, a new public hearing would then afford all interested parties the right to hear the facts, a right not yet satisfied. Sincerely, rJA /U&C& Peter M. Mahon, Jr. 4530 Bruce Avenue South Edina, Minnesota -l+- M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: INSURANCE RENEWALS DATE: June 17, 1985 I have subsequent to the distribution of my last memorandum concerning insurance renewals dated June 14, 1985 a quotation from the League of Minnesota Cities. In order to put the quotation in terms that are comparable to the information you have already received, I have extracted the rate for the property insurance coverage. I must point out, however, that the insurance company is not willing to split out any of the separate areas of coverage for purchase. Insurance companies for the most part want to quote total packages. I also want to include this note concerning the following quote: the liquor liability is based on 1% of the gross sales, and in this instance we are using 1984 sales figures. Liability and Workers' Compensation $515,930 Property Insurance, $122,566 including an 8% assessment charge Based on this new information, I feel reinforced in my recommendation for awarding the quotation from the Home Insurance Company for the City's Liability and Workers' Compensation coverage, and the Hartford's quotaton for the City's property insurance coverage. KR /sw M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: 1985 INSURANCE RENEWALS - LIABILITY, PROPERTY DATE: June 14, 1985 As you are well aware, we have been working for some time on our insurance renewals. Unfortunately, we have experienced less than positive responses to our efforts to obtain quotations for our Liability, Workers' Compensation and Property Insurances. To date, we have one quote for Liability and Workers' Compensation (see Attachment A) from Harris- Homeyer Company. This quotation is a three -line retro in which a formula containing a loss control factor, a tax factor, a basic factor and losses incurred are used to compute a final premium. I am also including Attachment B which illustrates what our premium costs would have been based on this formula using our last seven (7) years of actual losses. Attachment C contains examples of premiums using the formula based on projected losses of 50, 80, 110, 150, and 200 thousand dollars. Please note that our highest amount of losses over the past seven years have been 99,636. Attachment D is a recap of premiums the City has paid for its Liability and Workers' Compensation coverage for the past seven years. I am including this material for your consideration because the premium the City would be responsible for is based on our loss experience for the coming year. I want to point out that we have had very good experience records for the past seven years; assuming that the record remains the same for the coming year, our premiums would reflect a substantial increase, but not to the level we had anticipated. Based on information received to date, Staff recommends awarding the renewal of Liability and Workers Compensation coverage to Home Insurance. In the area of property insurance, the agent representing the City received quotes from seven companies (see Attachment E). The Staff worked with the agent to reduce the premiums by adjusting the amount of the deductibles, but the cost benefit of such adjustments was not viable. Therefore, Staff is recommending the low quotation from the Hartford Company. At this point, we still have no definite quotations for our umbrella coverage and our Paramedic Malpractice coverage, but Staff will continue to vigorously pursue renewals in these areas. KR /sw Attachments dh Harris- Homeyer Corr mm P.O. Box 27106 ■ Minneapolis, Minnesota 55427 (612) 541 -1221 June 4, 1985 Ms. Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Re: Home Insurance Renewal Quote Dear Ceil: Our quote is as follows: One Year Combined Incurred Loss Retro Auto, Work Comp, G.L. Basic .210 (83,790) LCF 1.13 Tax 1.115 Maximum 1.15 max. (508,350) Minimum Basic x Tax Loss Limit 150,000 Work Comp. 100,000 per line, Auto and G.L. Standard Premium $399,000 Non - Subject $49,500 ARcLrhWeujr fi William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris, CPCU Gladyne Peterson Dorothy Metzger Premium is payable at 40% down, 30% after three months and 30% after six months. Formula for Determining Premium [$asic + (Losses x L.C.F.D x Tax = ? + non - subject premium = final premium (83,790) _ (? x 1.13)J x 1.115 = ? + 49,500 = ? (final premium) Examples based on past 7 years Losses = 58,832 1984 -85 83,790 + (58,832 x 1.132 x 1.115 = 130,756 + 49,500 = $217,051 Losses = 62,096 1983 -84 [83,790 + (62,096 x 1.131 x 1.115 = 171,663 + 49,500 = $221,163 Losses = 64,890 1982 -83 [83,790 + (64,890 x 1.13] x 1.115 = 175,184 + 49,500 = $224,684 Losses = 88,880 1981 -82 D3,790 + (88,880 x 1.13J x 1.115 = 205,410 + 49,500 = $254,910 Losses = 99,636 1980 -81 L83,790 + (99,636 x 1.13 x 1.115 = 218,963 + 49,500 = $268,463 Losses = 92,191 1979 -80 03,790 + (92,191 x 1.13V x 1.115 = 209,582 + 49,500 = $259,082 Losses = 65,934 1978 -79 3,790 + (65,934 x 1.135 x 1.115 = 176,499 + 49,500 = $225,999 N tt EXAMPLES BASED ON PROJECTED LOSSES Loss = 50,000 - Final Premium = 205,923.3 Loss = 80,000 - Final Premium = 243,721.8 Loss = 110,000 - Final Premium = 281,520.3 Loss = 150,000 - Final Premium = 331,918.3 Loss = 200,000 - Final Premium = 394,915.8 WORK COMP LIABILITY LSQUOR AUTO H HAckme + p CITY OF EDINA PREMIUM RECAP 78/79 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 1.58,705 181,731 210,006 189,035 182,212 81,482 105,443 69,933 75,208 57,756 69,046 28,107 30,901 19,227 19,509 28,945 29,390 15,452 15,172 79,289 35,153 37,965 18,170 5,872 6,512 17,676 14,100 - 14,064 TOTAL 285,690 317,230 302,441 292,762 297,347 136,607 163,984 INSURANCE COMPANIES CONTACTED FOR PROPERTY INSURANCE PROPOSALS FOR CITY OF EDINA 1. Hartford Insurance Company 2. Kemper Insurance Company 3. American International Group ( *this proposal is based on a $5,000,000 loss limit per occurrence as opposed to full value coverage as currently written) Zurich Insurance Company 4. Great American Insurance Company 5. Fireman's Fund 6. Home Insurance Company 7. CNA 8. Chubb Insurance Company 9. Northbrook Insurance Company 10. Safeco Insurance Company 11. St. Paul Companies 12. Protection Mutual 13. IRI 14. North Star Casualty ( *$5,000 deductible, no flood & earthquake available) 15. John H. Crowther 16. Appalachian Insurance Company 17. CIGNA rt rMC41 M v4j- C $45,308 46,331 57,000* 62,000 73,700 Pending 85,634 No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote No Quote Very Limited Coverage* Pending No Quote No Quote A HHchme -u� Q CITY OF EDINA PREMIUM RECAP 78/79 79/80 80/81 81/82 82/83 83/84 84/85 WORK COMP 1.58,705 181,731 210,006 189,035 182,212 81,482 105,43 LIABILITY .69,933 75,208 57,756 69,046 79,289 35,153 37,965 LIQUOR .28,107 30,901 19,227 19,509 18,170 5,872 6,512 AUTO 28,945 29,390 15,452 15,172 17,676 14,100 - 14,064 TOTAL 285,690 317,230 302,441 292,762 297,347 136,607 163,984 NET PRUIIU14 274,222 234,003 248,308 239,780 135,119 163,984 1,jLQUEST FOR PURCIIIASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works AA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 14, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): 1 - Van for Util.ity Department. V -6, Auto Trans., Power Brakes & Steering Quotations /Bids: Company �• Suburban Chevrolet 2. Rosedale Chevrolet IV B Amount-of Quote or Bid $9,539.90 $9,936.60 Freeway Ford $10,128.00 Department Recommendation: Suburban Chevrolet $9,539.90 n-z Public Works - Utility Signat a Department Finance Director's Endo nt: The recommended bid is rsem is not within the amount budget for the purchase. N r\ (1 . en, rinance Director City Ma per's Endorseinent : 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nneth ( Rosland, City Manager .REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: -Mayor and City Council 'ROM: John Wallin, Assistant Finance Director VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 17, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): 1985 Buick LeSabre 4 door Custom Quotations /Bids: Com any 1. Walser Buick 2. Win Stephens Nelson- Lenzen Department Recommendation: Walser Buick Amount of Quote or Bid $11,805.00 12,063.00 13,284.00 Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended b1 cis) is not within the amount budget for the purchase. N. uaien, Finance Director Ci�tyyMM aoer's Endorsement: `I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: kLkl Ljc6 i rUiC i UKi:ii;JL IV D TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURC11ASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 14, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Sprinkler Modifications for Community Center Parking Lots: P -14 & P -15 (Approved Previously) Quotations /Bids: Company �• Green Acres Sprinkler Co. 2. Albrecht Landscape Amount of Ouote or Bid $8,265.00 $8,400.00 . Department P.econ=endation: Green Acres Sprinkler Co. $8, 265.00 Public Works--Engineering 9 9 Signa ur _ Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the P urchase. J. en, finance Director City M aner's Endorsement: 7. I concur with the recorn-12ndation of the De artn; p ent and reconunend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recoir�rend as an al ternati ve : A Kenneth Rosland, City (•lanager 0 MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE JUNE 11, 1985 9:00 AM Members present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Lois Coon Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Members absent: None Others present: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department SECTION A i Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. NONE. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE, SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others. 1. Request for traffic signal on Valley View Road at exit from Edina Junior/ Senior High School campus, Request received from George Skluzacek, Assistant Principal, Edina High School, ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven reported that the driveway under consideration does not have a significant accident history, Mr. Hoffman reported that the driveway appears to have two 20- minute problems; when school starts and when school lets out, Additionally, Valley View Road carries a volume of approximately 3500 cars per day and the establishment of warrants would be remote. Lastly, TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING June 11, 1985 Page 2 state aid funding to assist in such a project would not be available, The requestor, George Skluzacek, was not present at the committee meeting, Ms. Fuhr moved that the matter be continued until July 1985., Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0, 2. Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 40th Street at Monterey Avenue, Request received from Roy Lewis, 4000 Monterey Avenue, ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Lewis, the requestor, requested the item be continued for one month -to allow his participation at the meeting. Ms. Fuhr moved that the matter be continued one month, Ms. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE �y __9 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: WOODHAVEN FUNDING DATE: June 14, 1985 The City Council granted preliminary rezoning approval to PSR -4 for Woodhaven on April 1, 1985. This proposed project includes 29 units designed for senior citizen occupancy and is located west of Summit Avenue and south of Interlachen Boulevard. Sponsors for the project are the Community Development Corporation (a division of the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis) and a group of Edina churches. The attached letter from John Rocheford of CDC outlines the present status of the project. In short, the sponsoring churches have raised 75% of their goal of $75,000 and are now asking that the City of Edina commit $195,000 toward the project. Approval of the project by H. U. D. is expected by October. Edina has participated in several similar low and moderate income housing projects; e.g. Yorkdale Townhouses, Oak Glen and Southhaven. The City has funded the major portion of the cost necessary to acquire the.property for these projects. It is proposed that the City fund $195,000 of the $212,000 land acquisition cost for Woodhaven. In past cases, the City has agreed to its financial commitment at the time of final zoning and redevelopment contract approval. In this case, a preliminary commitment is requested to assist in securing financing from H. U. D. If the City chooses to fund this project, most if not all of our participation would come from CDBG funds. We currently have $178,192 in the CDBG budget for land acquisition. The remaining funds could be provided by reprogramming other CDBG accounts or through the tax increment process. (This site is within the Grandview T. I. F. district.) Staff would recommend that the City agree to a preliminary commitment of not more than $195,000, subject to execution of an acceptable redevelopment project at the time of final rezoning. GH /sw Attachment ARCHDIOCESE OF SAINT PAUL AND MINNEAPOLIS 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Community Development Corporation June 12, 1985 Mr. Gordon Hughes Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street ;Edina, MN 55424 Dear Gordon: Community Development Corporation has been working with Ministerial association to sponsor Woodhaven Non - profit Corporation in Edina. This proposed development would units of housing for low- income elderly persons. 612 -291 -1750 the Edina Housing provide 29 Funds from the Federal government, the City of Edina, and the community must be pledged to be able to build the proposed housing. The following commitments will be needed before the Woodhaven project can proceed: $1,070,000 Mortgage from the Department of Housing and Urban Development $ 75,000 Churches of Edina $ 195,000 Block Grant Funds from the City of Edina An application for mortgage funds and for rental assistance has been submitted on behalf of Woodhaven Non- profit Housing Corporation to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for the proposed elderly housing to be built on Summit Avenue in Edina. Although the request is not certain to be funded, Edina is a_priority area to receive such monies. Federal funds will be assigned by October, 1985. Over $55,600 has been pledged by Edina churches through the efforts of the Edina Ministerial Association. The group indicates $75,000 is a realistic goal. To complete the needed funding, Community Development Corporation, as sponsor for Woodhaven, is now requesting a commitment from the City of Edina for $195,000 in Block Grant Funds to make this housing possible. Such a commitment would be subject to a redevelopment agreement. We request that this proposal be considered at the Council meeting on Monday, June 17, 1985. A recipient agency of the Annual Catholic Appeal V1` M6 14 Mr. Gordon Hughes June 12,_1985 Page 2 On behalf of the Edina Ministerial Association and Woodhaven Non- profit Housing Corporation I wish to thank you for considering this proposal. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, John L. Rocfieford, Jr. Management Director a bcc/ -Edina Ministerial Assoc. . .,,,Housing Committee Churches who have committed funds: Colonial Church of Edina Normandale Lutheran Ch. Lutheran Ch of the Good Shepherd Edina Community 'Lutheran Church St. Stephens Episcopal Church "uT l eEh Churchat Christ--Presbyterian Church E M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: REDEVELOPMENT OF MANN DRIVE -IN - BLOOMINGTON DATE: June 14, 1985 As you know, Mayor Courtney in a May 15th letter requested a joint meeting with the Bloomington City Council concerning the above - referenced project. Although we have not received a response from Mayor Lindau, I have spoken with Rick Geshwiler, Bloomington City Planner, and Linda Fisher, attorney for Homart Development Company. Mr. Geshwiler could not, of course, commit to a meeting with the Bloomington Council but did suggest that if such a meeting were held, it should occur after the completion of the draft E. I. S. for the project. I agreed with his suggestion. The E. I. S. has now been completed, and several copies have been sent for our review. I will bring copies to Monday's Council Meeting in the event that Council Members wish to review the document. To date, we have received no further response from Bloomington concerning our request for a meeting. Ms. Fisher advised me that Homart Development Company was very willing to make a presentation to the Edina City Council concerning the project. I noted that we were more interested in meeting with Bloomington's Council but that we would advise the Council of Homart's offer. If the Council is interested, we could invite Homart for the July 1st Meeting. GH /sw RESOLUTION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD WHEREAS, Homart Development Company is proposing to redevelop the-Mann. Theatre site in the City of Bloomington; and WHEREAS, the proposed development is adjacent to County Road 17 (France Avenue; and WHEREAS, the proposed development is very intense by City of Edina Standards; and WHEREAS, the current improvement of the I- 494/France interchange is underway; and WHEREAS, the proposed project will have a major impact on the new interchange; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is aware that completion of the new interchange will result in additional capacity for undeveloped properties near I- 494 /France Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is concerned over the traffic impact of the proposed project on the county and state road systems; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council urges Hennepin County to very rigorously review the Homart EIS as to trip distribution, capacity analysis on County intersections and interchanges, and adequacy of base line data used to develope the above information in traffic anaylsis. ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 17, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 15th day of July, 1985. City Clerk M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rolland, City Manager DATE: May 22, 1985 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Domestic Disturbance Calls As a follow -up to the March 11, 1985 meeting of the City Council and the Health Board, the following items have been implemented: 1. The attached informational brochure is being distributed to participants in domestic assault calls. It was provided by Cornerstone and its generic nature should improve knowledge of services available. 2. On May 8, 1985, a meeting between the City Manager, Chief of Police and Cornerstone representatives was conducted. Almost universal agreement was apparent on several discussion topics. Additionally, Cornerstone has offered training for police officers later. in 1985. 3. The "Edina Police.Report" featured domestic abuse during May 1985 programming and all the major providers were featured in the report. If you have questions or suggestions to aid in our communication efforts, please contact me. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT CGS:nah PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAJ, AND SEXUAL ABUSE CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE, CHILD, YOUTH, ADULT, OR SENIOR, MALE OR FEMALE DoesAnyone Who Is ImportantToYou: • Continually criticize you or ignore you until you feel invisible? • Make you feel nothing is enough, no matter how hard you W • Callyou dirty or demeaning names hike crazy, stupid, etc.; make you feel "put - down"or embarrassed in front of friends? • Regularly threaten to leave or tell you toleave? • Get jealous, angry or assume you are having sex? • Hurt your pets, children or destroy your personal belongings? • Slap, push, kick, bite, pull your hair or throw objects atyou? • Make sexual comments about your body or touch you so you feel uncomfortable? • Deny the abuse; accuse you of malting it ►' up or tell you it's your fault? j Afterthris ha p.pens to you the person . wants to be kind, close and loving, makring you think the abuse didn't happen or it will never happen again. But it does happen again! If any of these things are happening to you –IT IS NOT OKAY! ! It is okay to tell someone who can , help you. There are people working in the following agen- cies who understand how you feel and want to help. You can call to gather information about = your choices or just to talk. SOUTH SUBURBAN AGENCIES DEALING WITH DOMESTIC ABUSE Cornerstone Advocacy Service 2200 W. Old Shakopee Rd. Bloomington, MN 55431 Phone: 884 -0330 (24 hours) Full range of emergency services to battered women and their children (housing, transpor- tation, food). Also assistance in obtaining Orders for Protection, legal advocacy, support groups (child care provided) and information about abuse. Serving Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. No fees. Public Health Services 1900 W. Old Shakopee Rd. Bloomington, MN 55431 Phone: 887-9603 (8 -4:30 M -F) Focus is on preventing child abuse and neglect of children. Children and youth clinics, W.I.C. serv- ices, parent communication seminars. Serving Bloomington, Richfield and Edina. Sliding fee. Side by Side 9801 Penn Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55431 Phone 881 -2178 (8:30 -5:00 MT, evening by appointment) Full range of counseling services to adolescents, young adults, and their families. Serving Bloomington. Sliding fee scale, no one will be denied service because of inability to pay. 24 hour information number for agencies listed: 884 -0330 specific crisis numbers on back— South Hennepin Branch Family and Cdren's Service ! 9301 Bryant Avenue South, Suite 101 Bloomington, MN 55420 Phone: 884 -7353 (8:30 -5:00 MT, eveningbyappointment) Full range of counseling services. Groups for men, women, incest victims. Educational series about family violence. Serving Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. Sliding fee /insur- ance. Self help groups no fee. South Hennepin Information and Referral 9801 Penn Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55431 Phone: 881 -5811 ext. 338 (8 -4:30 MA Information about social services, counseling, support groups and emergency services avail- able to Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield residents. No fees. - Storefront/Youth Action 7145 Harriet Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Phone: 861 -1675 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 Phone: 926 -1851 Storefront/YMCA 8100 School Road Eden Prairie MN 55344 Phone: 934 -776 Counselin& foryouth and their families. Special programs for physically /sexually abused adoles- cents, juvenile sexual offenders, and support groups for adolescents. No fees to youth, sliding fee scale for family counseling. (9 -5, M -F, evening byappointment all locations.) If You Are The Victim Of Domestic Violence you can ask the city or county attor- ney to file a criminal complaint. You also have the , right to go to court and file a petition requesting an Order for Protection from domestic abuse which could include the following: A. An order restraining the abuser from further acts of abuse; B. An order directing the abuser to leave your household; C. An order preventing the abuser from entering your residence, school, business, or place of employment; D. An order awarding you or the other parent custody of, or visitation with, your minor child or children; E. An order directing the abuser to pay support to you and the minor children if the abuser has a legal obligation to do so. (issued pursuant to M.S. 629 -34) Emergency Housing For Battered Women And Their Children Cornerstone Advocacy Service South Hennepin County ........... 884 -0330 B. Robert Lewis House Eagan .........................452 -7288 Sojourner Shelter Hopkins ....................... 933 -7422 7 County Metro Area.....:. ...... 646 -0994 (Collect calls and TTY access) i 24 Hour Emergency Numbers Child Abuse Prevention ............337 -2223 Crisis Intervention Center........... 347 -3161 Crisis Nursery .................... 729 -5500 Detoxification Center .............. 941 -0200 Sexual Violence Center of Hennepin County .............. 824 -5555 St. Joseph's Children's Home ........ 827 -6241 Suicide Line ...................... 347 -2222 Youth Emergency Service (YES) ...... 339 -7033 Nighttime Emergency Outreach Network (NEON) ................ 339 -0895 Other Important Numbers Adult Protection .................. 348 -8526 Child Protection .................. 348 -3552 Order for Protection ............... 348 -5073 Bloomington Police ................. 887 -9600 Eden Prairie Public Safety .......... 937 -2700 Edina Police ..................... 925 -2242 Richfield Public Safety ............. 866 -5061 Emergency Number — Police Fire — Medical —Abuse — 911 - NO CHILD WOMAN MAN DBERVES TO BE PHYSI(ALLY EMOTIONALLY OR SEXUALLY ABUSED r I J Ll -V-LJI ! MEMORANDUM co pry a Ham. TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: INDUCING RESOLUTION - MULTI- FAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS EDINBOROUGH DATE: June 14, 1985 In conjunction with its approval of the Edinborough redevelopment contract, the City has tentatively agreed to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds to finance the construction of the 202 -unit senior citizen building. To effect such an issuance, the City Council must first adopt an inducing resolution which includes a program for the development of the project and its financing. This program and necessary resolutions are attached. If the City Council adopts these resolutions, then the program and an application are submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. The total bond issue as requested is $18.5 million. As you know, these are revenue bonds and, therefore, are not backed by the general funds of the City or the tax increments of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment District. GH /sw Attachment i r - D R A F T - City of Edina, Minnesota PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C 1. [a Minnesota limited Partnership] [to be formed with as its general partner and as its initial limited partner] (the "Developer "), intends to'acquire approximately acres of vacant land in the City of , Minnesota (the "City ") and construct thereon a multifamily residential rental facility to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in part by persons and families of low and moderate income. The site is located at 7800 York Avenue in the City. A map of the site and legal description of the property are attached to this Program as Exhibits A and B, respectively. The development will contain approximately 203 housing units, at least 20% of which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate income," under §103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended (the "Code ") and the Regulations thereunder. 2. Representatives of the Developer have requested that the City issue its housing revenue bonds under the Act in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000 to finance the acquisition of the site and the construction and equipping of the development and facilities functionally subordinate and related to the development. 3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for the City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock throughout -the City, for persons residing in the City, including elderly persons and persons of low and moderate income. The development to be financed by the Program will assist the City in certain problems addressed in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available housing stock, (b) providing decent, sanitary and affordable housing for elderly persons and persons of low and moderate income and their families, [Specify others]. 4. The development will be a "multifamily housing development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of §462C.02 of the Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd. 4 of §462C.05 of the Act. The income limitations set forth in' Subd. 2 of §462C.05 of the Act will not apply to this development. In addition, as discussed in paragraph 1 of this Program, at least 20% of the units will be rented or availabale for rental to persons of low and moderate income; that is, with incomes not greater than 80% of the median family income as estimated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical area in which the City is located, currently $26,800. 5. To finance the development, the City intends to issue its housing revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000 (the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which the Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to repay the Bonds. The Bonds will be a limited obligation of the City, payable solely from revenues derived from the revenue agreement and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured by a mortgage and security interest in the development, or by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one or more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage loan or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices. -2- h CERTIFICATION Multifamily OF MINUTES RELATING TO Housing Revenue Bonds Project) Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on Monday, June 17, 1985, at o'clock P.M. at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of June, 1985. (SEAL) Signature Name and Title RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findings 1.1. By the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. 1.2. The City has developed a housing plan and, after holding a public hearing thereon after notice published at least thirty days prior thereto, has adopted the housing plan and submitted it for review to the Metropolitan Council and has received its comments. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the Agency), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the-Act, on the basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act. 1.4. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the Act), consisting of the acquisition of land and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units together with parking and other functionally related and subordinate facilities (the Development), to be located in the City at 7800 York Avenue. The developer and owner of the Development will be a limited partnership to be formed (the Developer), whose general partner or partners will -2- be Partners for Senior Communities, an Illinois partnership, or Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation, (Partners), or one or more of the following partners or shareholders of Partners: Henry Hyatt, Daniel Epstein, Sheldon Baskin, William De Woskin or Manuel Kramer. 1.5. The City has caused to be prepared a program with respect to the Development and its financing (the Program). At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on June 17, 1985, in accordance with the Act and Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, on the proposal to undertake the Program and finance the Development, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake the Program and finance the Development, and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing. 1.6. The Developer has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or more series pursuant to the authority of the Act in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000, to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Development, and to make the proceeds of the bonds available to the Developer for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the bonds. 1.7. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to pay the capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the Development can be constructed as designed and its operation can be made more economically feasible. 1.8. This Council has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, that on the basis of information available to them and their discussions with'the Developer and potential purchasers of tax - exempt bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. 1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or-,,responsible for the payment of the principal of, or premium or interest on the bonds. -3- SECTION 2 2.1. On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance the Development in the maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000. 2.2. It is determined to proceed with the Development and its financing and this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Development. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue bonds. The City.retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the Bonds should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the Bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the financing or as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to reveiw and approval of the Program by the Agency and may be subject to such further conditions as the City may specify. The bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 2.3. The Program is hereby approved, and in accordance with Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2 of the Act, the City Manager is.hereby authorized and directed to cause the Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval. The City Manager, City Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed to provide the Agency with any preliminary information needed for this purpose. 2.4. Pursuant to Subdivision 1 of Section 462C.07 of the Act, in the making of the loan to finance acquisition, construction and equipment of the Project and in the issuance of the bonds or other obligations of the City, the City may -4- exercise, within its corporate limits, any of the powers the Agency may exercise under Chapter 462A, Minnesota Statutes, without limitation under the provisions of Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. 2.5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the City in connection with the Program and the Development, whether or not the Development is carried to completion, whether or not the Program is approved by the Agency, and whether or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by the Developer upon request. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 17th'day of June, 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. -5- CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on Monday, June 17, 1985, at o'clock P.M. at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at*said meeting, so far as they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of June, 1985. (SEAL) Signature Name and Title RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AU'T'HORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: SECTION 1 Recitals and Findings 1.1. By the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. 1.2. The City has developed a housing plan and, after holding a public hearing thereon after notice published at least thirty days prior thereto, has adopted the housing plan and submitted it for review to the Metropolitan Council and has received its comments. 1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions 2, -3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (the Agency), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the basis of the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act. 1.4. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality finance a portion or all of the cost of a proposed multifamily housing development under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the Act), consisting of the acquisition of land from the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the Foundation) and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units together with parking and other functionally related and subordinate facilities (the Development), to be located in the City at 7800 York Avenue. The developer and owner of the Development will -2- be a limited partnership to be formed (the Developer), whose general partner or partners will be Partners for Senior Communities, an Illinois partnership, or Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation, (Partners), or one or more of the following partners or shareholders of Partners: Henry Hyatt, Daniel Epstein, Sheldon Baskin, William De Woskin or Manuel Kramer. 1.5. The City has caused to be prepared a program with respect to the Development and its financing (the Program). At a public hear .ing, duly noticed and held on June 17,1985, in accordance with.the Act_and Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, on the proposal to undertake the Program and finance the Development, all parties who appeared at-the hearing were given an opportunity to- express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake the Program and finance the Development, and interested persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing. 1.6. The Developer has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or more series pursuant to the authority of the Act in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000, to finance all or a portion of the costs of the Development, and to make the proceeds of the bonds available to the Developer for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the bonds. 1.7. The City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial financing is available to pay the capital costs of the Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the Development can be constructed; as designed and its operation can be made more economically feasible. 1.8. This Council has been advised,"by. representatives of the Developer and Dain Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota,,.that on the basis of information available to them and-their discussions with. the Developer and potential purchasers of tax- exempt bonds, the bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to finance the Project. 1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, or premium or interest on the bonds. -3- SECTION 2 2.1. On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it would be desirable for the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to finance the Development in the maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $18,500,000. 2.2. It is determined to proceed with the Development and its financing -and this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Development, provided that the Developer enters into an agreement with the Foundation to acquire the land for purposes I of constructing the Development. Notwithstanding the foregoing,.however,' the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a,legal obligation on the part of the City or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance of such revenue bonds. The City retains the right in its sole discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the bonds should the City at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the City not to issue the bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the financing or as to.the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the, transaction. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to reveiw.and approval of the Program by the Agency and may be subject to such further conditions as the City may specify. The bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues of the Development specifically pledged to the payment thereof; and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues of the Development and property specifically pledged under the revenue agreement to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of. the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation. 2.3. The Program is hereby approved, and in accordance with Section 462C.04`, Subdivision 2 of the Act, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to cause the Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval. The City Manager, City Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents -of the City are hereby authorized and directed to provide the Agency with any preliminary information needed for this purpose. 2.4. Pursuant to Subdivision 1 of Section 462C.07 of the Act, in the making of the loan to finance acquisition, -4- construction and 'equipment of the Project and in the issuance of the bonds or other obligations.of the City, the City may exercise, within its corporate, limits, any of'the powers the Agency may.exercise,under`Chapter 462A, Minnesota statutes, without limitation under the provisions of Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes. 2.5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all direct and indirect costs incurred by the City in connection with the Program and the Development, whether or not the Development is carried to completion, whether =or not the Program is I approved by the Agency, and whether'or not the City by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by the Developer upon request. Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 17th day of 'June, 1985. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk. -5- V 198 5 1 CF EO INA 7 i r r CHECK N0. DATE r v M r 155368 06/10 / 9, r 1. ;s ti r s CHECK ISTER AUMIAIT VCAIn R2 TTCU nCCrCTCTTn.', 06 -17 'AGE 1 ■r�nn ..T un Tuu o n ucee.cr 4 E5 21476.64 MUTUAL BENEFIT LONG TERM CISABILITY 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL 21476.64 * * ** -CKS 155731 -16/101E5 539126 *90 NOPWEST EANK BCNC FAYMENT 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 539126.00 * • +� -CKS 157251 06/10/85 1359000.00 EDINA HRA DLE FROM HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL I 1 35 9000.0 0 , rr *fa CKS 1 152588 6/12/85 224.40 WESTERN LIFE EMPLOYER CCNST 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL` 224.40 * *er! ** ! ++ -CKS 1 1628-, C. 6/12/85 29007.00 FISTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 29000.10 * * *r -CKS 165512 06/11/E5 54.87 S T ROBB GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 155512 06/11/85 7.05 S T 2088 REPAIR PARTS 1iL -4540- 646 -64 165512 06/11/F5 5.36 S T ROBB REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 646 -64 67.28 • fa * * ** +•+ -CKS 166CU.3 C6/C7/85 64.30 ALBINSON GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 64.?0 1680U4 06/06/E5 119.67 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 440 -44 163074 06/06/85 10.94 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 482 -48 _�- 1.6d9U4 G6,/G6/85 156.48 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52 158004 06/C6/85 17.25 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 628 -62 168UG4 (WG6 /8` 129. ^8 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27 -4262- 661 -66 166004 C6/C6/95 35.42 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 821 -82 1660114 UW6185 77.56 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 168004 06/C6/85 57.64 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50.4262- 861 -86 - - -- - - - -- 605,04 * 168'0 C'5 C6/C4/85 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ACVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -E2 168UC5 CO/04/85 37.25 AUCIO GROUD ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 862 -86 74.50 * ---- r•*r*r * ** -CKS 1680x7 06/05/85 22.00 APEX PEST CONTROL GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 22.00 168008 06/04/85 49982 KAMAN BEARING 8 SPLY REPAIR PAPATS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 4 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -17 -85 PAGE 2 rHFCI( AI?_ (1ATF AmnuSIT y, -wn r7 tTVM 11CSrGTPTTnIU ArrnnA:T un_ TA1I_ A 0 - x uccc .r_: 2 1680x8 C6/10/?!5 51. °,2 KAMAN BEARING R SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2 --- -..... - _ - -- - -- _ -- _._- _�.�1_. b y 4 4 ' 16b009 Lb/11/85 4'.15 ASTLEFORC EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 - - - -- ° 4.15 • 9 7 ° 0 ff #r•r #ff -CKS D :O O 168(212 :6/11/85 14.')0 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 " 168012 ^6/x-7/85 14.00 AUTOMUBILE SERVICE C CUNT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 28.'0 f is 4 168013 06/11/85 72.80 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 44C -44 ;s " 1681.3C6/10 /E_: _4Z, 52 'A ERNATCR RE? GEN SUPPI.Z 10- 4504 - 440;44 zo 168C13 ;6 /1C /85 176.85 .TLD ALTERNATCR REP-UILD REPAIR, PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 - _ 6 2i 17 168 ^13 C6 11U /85 60.00 AL TERNA TCR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540- 560 -56 27 10 168013 06/10/85 !l of ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR FARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 zx 'B 168!`13 L6/1I/E5 17.34 .,ALTERNIATC4 REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 _ - 20 21 168013 __ - -• - -- i-�6 /1G 195 ._..- 28.30 428,81 ALTERNATOR REBUILD • GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -EG 7 ,R Z2 23 za tAffff - - - fff -CKS - 2c 31 32 168015 06/04/85 72.00 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 T? 168015 C6/12/85 13.41 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 27 AT 8 T INFO S Y S T F M TELEPHONE 23- 4256-611 -61 20 168015 Co/12/85 36.94 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHCNE 27- 4256- 661 -66 3^ 2' 3C 162.75 #' 3- 4 3. + #• -CKS -- 168018 ,- _C.6 /1Z /P_5 4,50 AT & T INFO SYSTEM --USE.EHCNE 29-4256-721-72 r. 44 34 168U16 ^_6/12/85 9.7(I AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40- 42`.6- 801 -8G _ - 3' 1bb018 Ub/12/R5 4.50 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 ` 16 6.R ^18 C611d/85 7.32 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE `.0- 42'.6- 841 -84 47 4p 3' 168018 L6/12/85 9.0D AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 �e 00 30 34.32 nc 7i e0 - - - - -- + ++-CKS 42 - o_8C44 06/10/05 42.40 ARTISTA N PRIN NG 23 -46C0- 610 -61 1n A3 44 42.40 + I�p 3 45 -_ ___._1.68Q2.5��_Cib/._i_Q1.E.�_ 28.00 ALFONS ANOERSSON CAT SERV 27- 4200 - 661 -66 R 47 40 be'12� bLt1 /85 4 551 R0 RADGEP METER INC WATER METERS 40 1220 - 000 -00 92 P3 R4 40 loSO26 06/04185 235.47 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 807 -80 °O 71 49787.47 ] ez 73 f f t i A i Af• -CKS c• ]C 04 -6 d.U1R 0AL11 R5 671 .25 RFFR WHOLE SAL RS INVENTORY 27- 4630 - 664 -66 72 168028 06/11/85 2T 701.95 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY -, 50- 4630- 822 -82 '3 166028 U6/12/85 4,587.85 BEER WHOLE SALERS INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 7 '] 1SP5 Y OF �DINA 3.708.35 BFER WHOLESALERS INVFNTORV rurry •n_ nATr Bunn.,• CHECI ,ISTER CE -17- PAGE 3 Vr..n ID TTC4 nfCn -- - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - --------- - - - - -- - ,I 168029 06111/85 3.708.35 BFER WHOLESALERS INVFNTORV 50- 4630- 862 -fE — - -- - - - -- -- -- 11 .669.4 0 + 16bu?9 C6/11/F5 129.35 BERG 8 FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -3C 1661_29 "6/11/85 129.35 BcRG 8 FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 258.70 + ._._- f•• -ft+ ________..__._.__._ -__ �_._.- _ -___. •• +-CKS 168J34 06/1u/85 114.19 BLOOMINGTON CHP•Y -PLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 166034_ u6/10/85 11R.52 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 168034 f;6/11/ ?5 29.47 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY PARTS 104620- 60 -56 ° ° 262.1 T + ••• -CKS 168136 06/12/85 100. ^0 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100- 420 -42 ' 100.00 + 16.39 -_ _ L6/11?/85 u_ _ �. 616_.29 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC RIP RAP 10 -4548- 358 -30 616.29 f - •itt ++ * +• -CKS 168041 "6/12/85 1976.9.55 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 166G411.6/1.2/95� 11 121.25 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 314 -30 1 SC 41 C6/10 /?5 5,001.85 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 314 -3C 17,891.65 ..• +i t • +* -CKS [6/1!18- 44.50 B 8 9 SEAT COVER CCNT REPAIRS 1D- 4248 -560 56 44.50 + -- -`- fttt.• .•• -CKS 168 C4 7 06/10/85 453.30 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUFFLIES 10- 4508- 422 -42 ___ I(-dQ47 - 16/10/85 45.40- BROWN PHOTO CREDIT 10 -4508- 422 -42 407.90 + -- t•rt•• ••• -CKS 168053 06/10/85 327.12 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTICN 10 -4250- 301 -30 168C53_ . -_ -5- Q6/10185 83.22 PROWNTNG FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 425_0- 44_6 -44 16bb 6/10 /F5 151.34 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTICN IC -4250- 520 -52 168C53 u6/10/ ?5 327.12 ERCWNING FERRIS REFLSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 540 -54 168053 ^6/10/85 60.00 PROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTICN 10- 4250 - 628 -62 168125 QE /10/85 47.51 EROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 646 -64 168053 06/10/E5 123.04 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTICN 10- 4250- E46 -64 168053 __,____ rb /10 /?5 29.42 PR OWNING FERRIS REFLSE C {LLECTICN 23- 4250- 61_1 -6E 16FC53 �16/10 1 E5 152.23 BROWNING F_RRTS REFUSE CCLLECTICN 27- 4250 - 661 -66 _ - 168 ^ -53 u6 /1u /85 43.04 PROWN?NG FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250 - 662 -66 1613053 ^0/10/ ?5 47.24 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTICN 28 -4250- 708 -7C 168053 1E805? 06/1U/85 06/10/85 276.97 368.98 BROWNING FERRIS BROWNING FERRIS REFLSE CCLLECTION REFUSE CCLLECTICN 50 -425C- 841 -84 50- 4250- 861 -86 -- - ---- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - -- - --------- - - - - -- - ,I 19F5 CITY OF ED INA `l ru rr n°TC •unnu• CHECK REGISTER nnn C6 -17 -85 PAGE 4 s , 2 3 �ylo6C54 29041.23 • 2 3 4 "6/10'/8_ 41.63 P.ATTERYuWAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 5 ' 168054 i6/12/E5 76.00 PATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 ° ° 169 05 4 ^6/10/85 125'.50 PATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 ° 168Q54 L6/10/E5 97.99 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 1C -4620- 560 -56 ° 166054 U6/10 /85 124.56 PATTERY UAREi4.nuSE P, ARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 9 - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - -- __465..68 + 2 10 11 ,x •..f.f -- ttt -CKS , ,r I 168C56 06/11/85 610,120 8 H K & R INC INSURANCE 10- 4260- 510 -51 " 14 15 610.00 • ,c 1_ 16 n -__._. _-. -_ + ++ -CKS 2-1 06/12/85_ 10.70 WAYNE BENNETT PC ICS' SERVICE 10- 4100- 420 -42 a a0 100.')0 laf. z1 -iff �•fa - -` - -- ---- -- rtt -C 7r -KS --- - - z Z3 168�EQ �6/101E5 164.60 AMBASSADCR SAUSAGE CCNCESSICNS 27- 4624- 664 -66 `° 164.60 Z5 2e 27 CKS 3' ] ` '° xe 30 108062 6/07/ ?5 30. ?2 30 . 8 2 + EROCK WHITE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 _ :1 31 32 • ++-CKS Al 13 20.30 [ULLIGAN CONT SEEN 10- 4200- 482 -48 4 4.. 34 168 ^65 C'�/11/r5 13 ?.7o CULLIGAN GEN SUPPLIES 50 -45C4- 821 -82 ]' ]B ]7 ]° f f t i t f 158.30 • iff -CKS 14" 4: 47 nr _ n 39__.-- ]6.c.C.7_iL- .__.____0.6/ ? /f5 44.40 CARLSON TH RMO REPAIR PARTS 40- 45/i0- 803 -8C �- 40 41 44.40 • .a 62 43 *A*-CKS S° e. n4 166U73 06/11/85 32.87 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 r 9° _- �_16EU7.:______- Sl6 /1.2.tf5 15.1 al CITY BFEA IKVw, -o.gY _ 51! -4630- 842 -84 46 47 4e 1630 ?3 06/1'1/85 73.18 2 62.20 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 ra n9 t ■ k i f . rtt -CKS F.-5 .43 CLANCY 0 -Q IN .0 G -- sVEPUSS 10- 4504- 260 -2 52 1o0075 -'6/ M / ?`_ 4.50 CLANCY DPUG INC GEN SUPPLIES -6 10- 4504 - 420-42 n '3 10875 06/10/85 24.75 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 7O _6 L3.5 06/10/E`. 7.18 CLANCY DRUG TNC GEN SUPPLIES 10-45C4-627-62 7. '= 168c75 06/10125 4.15 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO SLFFLIES 10- 4508200 -2C '6 7 60.31 + 74 7'1 1985 Y CF EOINA CHECK NC. CATE ANOUNT z w . � s CHECF ISTER 06 -17- PAGE 5 ur Nn no TTrw MC1ZrOT0?T11A1 APPfl11AIT Un- rR1. . e n A Yf0[.'r • t f R f • +•• -CKS 168u78 C6/11/85 448.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 168_C78 06/12/85 785.95 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTCRY 50 -4632- 842 -84 108078 06/11/85 19102.55 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 29336.75 * * ** -CKS 16d78'i _6 /1C /E5 3.096.59 CONT- M.INN CCNCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 39096.59 * 168081 76/11/85 _- .- ---- - - - -_- 27.25 _ CONT SAFETY EQUIP SAFETY EGLIP 10 -4642- 301 -3C 27.25 • - - - -- 166851 ^6/12/E5 15.010* MARTHA UNDQUIST _.._ -_. 10- 3500 - 000 -CC 168002 06/12/85 47.25 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 440 -44 _ 168CR2 (6/12/85 25.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 44C -44 168r62_ „-- ,L6/12/E5 39.00 _ CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EGUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 440 -44 168Ca2 jo/12/'?5 65.70 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 44C -44 168 ^82 C6 /11/85 1.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 166 [32 L6/11/85 30.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 54C -54 168982 [6/11/85 1.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPP 10 -45(24- 540 -54 168082 06/11/85 46.CO CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPP_'LIES 10- 4504- 56C -56 1660F2 6/r7 ie5 76.00 C ONWAX FIpE & SAFETY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 168082 X6/11/85 .175.00 C)PIWeY FiPE 8 SAFETY PARTS 110 -462[- 560 -56 - _ 1680 2 f- 6/12/8' 3.5^ CONWAY FIR= & SAFETY SAFETY EGLIF 10- 4642- 642 -64 168062 06/12/95 1.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY SAFETY EGLIP 10 -4642- 646 -64 1680 P2 C6112/E5 3.50 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY SAFETY EQUIP 1 -6-4-6-2- 646 -64 168082 L,6/1C/65 9.25 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY FIRE EQUIP 10- 4918 - 629 -62 __ 168 - 782__- _- �6/11/P5 50.50 CONWAY FIRE R SAFETY EGUIP MAINT i8 -4274- 70_8 -70 168!'62 C6/11 1E5 1.75 CONWAY FIPE & SAFETY FIRE PR= VENTICN 29- 4650 - 721 -72 y� 168002 i6 /11 /E5 52.50 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 410- 4504- 801 -8C 166x82 u6/11185 7.90 CONWAY FIP_ & SAFETY CCNT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 168082 u6 /11/85 56.75 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY CONT REPAIRTS 50 -4 8- 841 -84 168082 r16 /11 /E5 3.50 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY CCNT REPAIRS 5C- 4248 - 861 -86 698.95 * - - - --- ••fr►a • *• -CKS 168C9U 1061 CA 185 212.93 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 166091 06 /C7 /E5 111.62 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 166 9Q_ 06/x7/85 111.62 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR FARTS 10 -454C- 560 -56 166`: L6/�-,7•/65 89.39 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR FARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 525.56 + ■ f f • f • +•• -CKS _ -_ 1- 6,ia91 -_ - - - U6/r4185 34.45 COURTNEY C WAYM1IE MILEAGE 10 =4208- 100 -10 34.45 * - . * f f i • ••• -CKS 16d099 L6/10/85 123.22 CUSMMAN MOTOR CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 '*"5 r/Tv OF n �j, c*ccv x:. E _' 1re^. + 1^6,,6 lbvn�» . 16u if' , 4 murr / 1au1c .. __ | l- - * coscx soIsr:_'n c6-1r~o5 pucE o �oun - ------- --- W7 mn nlj ---------/'� QC/WI-���_J��.-w-�.o._x pcssxG-_ 1a3 �z . ^^^-cxs |` , a/1, 1/P 5 ---------'-----------------------'---------------------- - ---_- _-_' ^^°-c«S 126 .97 n^moocx - u-' sr INC znvcmrosv 50-4630-822-«2 ��� - ����L4xzp i� ~^^',"" ' 86.17 ozcscL yc�xzcr cu enru uu',r ^ 14 10-4620-560-5: | ~ -------' --- -_|' ' . .� 13- .72 � wr'RTT -SUPPLY ------------G-N SUPPLIES -----'-'---15~mc*-3,')1-3,Z'- /1 `6ulo 6/1,1 /85 113 .n0 nsxzr Suppu CLEAN cupe/Ez 10-4512-54C-54 | ����z� 'u/��'f - ' '— - ' ro~��au-���~�� / 1681 25 'w1e? 5 � »nz 15 -^ - .| �uu��, -��c»��: ,cm,^�n n�m/ u»pr�r ncw uupp za.*�o+»u��o�---- - - ---- - |-| " ^ ~c»rr y«�p�v c�cwmms cop��zco �o~4y1a~roa~vu | '- 2 9- 752.62��-_-_-________--__--____'-_-_---___--_-_' .| 1^ylu �6nnE 5 *x3.00 oxozS su,swE7 WEED comTnnL au~wcO~vnx~vJ / ` mm26 ,6 /°2/� F� ' � -----'-----'---------------------'- 511 75 .� ! cws � ^y � � � "/ e� y�./� ` onmzoc ScnvIccz czmI *Epoms 5o~4z4o-ow~o� � � °^^-cnS - - ------'------ | � u /u ` -------- ---- J �«u,�� �a/��/"5 5oa.4 s cA"� F Awncxoc.. osv SUPPLIES 10_4 5 C 4-2 6 0- 2 6-- | _ | n -6/�4' /95 154.3? cu»L �r -*wpcnucm ncp^zn FARTS 1o~m4�O-�o�47 a~a^ �m36 166136 J6/C7,/85 ,op./o EARL poNDc�Scm ! sz z~�a -------- '' . 992.95 ° - - �'' --~ -L )! ' ` = [^*L-_rR_H/mImn P POLICE O Ozf1CV~42o-�2 CIA HL- n nn H Loma o ocnxI � 0 0 ~*12 0- 18 *~lo cu/,6 /E 9 _21 If) .�_-_---_r^LE-GRcEN u _��ypxwy s s�� � u 10~45� � *~J�e-0 �6/r6/o5 r rr.rn o o�/s o onccw C COMPANY - `w u uuppLIc 1 1o~4 50 4~3 5 2 ~3 o �6 /'u/o5 3 3 4 .n0 n nmc o onccm c c31pemr o oco o oL^cv oInr 1 10~*562-353-30 �6 /`6 5 5 53.09 -____c^Lc_GPccN_coMPumr - -__-_sco B BLACK cIyl 1 10~45e2~6*2^64 � y/o� , ,^.-o O OIL s spcCn c crpPAwv s sco o owc"-cz;T -----'--10~45e2-646-64 - -- cu/.ms� 3 36. c C C Ls s s1cEv c cow"«nr G G-w s suppLIcs 4 40~*5c4~303~8c `0 1 ,6 /o5*2 . . a/1, 1/P 5 ---------'-----------------------'---------------------- - ---_- _-_' ^^°-c«S 126 .97 n^moocx - u-' sr INC znvcmrosv 50-4630-822-«2 ��� - ����L4xzp i� ~^^',"" ' 86.17 ozcscL yc�xzcr cu enru uu',r ^ 14 10-4620-560-5: | ~ -------' --- -_|' ' . .� 13- .72 � wr'RTT -SUPPLY ------------G-N SUPPLIES -----'-'---15~mc*-3,')1-3,Z'- /1 `6ulo 6/1,1 /85 113 .n0 nsxzr Suppu CLEAN cupe/Ez 10-4512-54C-54 | ����z� 'u/��'f - ' '— - ' ro~��au-���~�� / 1681 25 'w1e? 5 � »nz 15 -^ - .| �uu��, -��c»��: ,cm,^�n n�m/ u»pr�r ncw uupp za.*�o+»u��o�---- - - ---- - |-| " ^ ~c»rr y«�p�v c�cwmms cop��zco �o~4y1a~roa~vu | '- 2 9- 752.62��-_-_-________--__--____'-_-_---___--_-_' .| 1^ylu �6nnE 5 *x3.00 oxozS su,swE7 WEED comTnnL au~wcO~vnx~vJ / ` mm26 ,6 /°2/� F� ' � -----'-----'---------------------'- 511 75 .� ! cws � ^y � � � "/ e� y�./� ` onmzoc ScnvIccz czmI *Epoms 5o~4z4o-ow~o� � � °^^-cnS - - ------'------ | � u /u ` -------- ---- J �«u,�� �a/��/"5 5oa.4 s cA"� F Awncxoc.. osv SUPPLIES 10_4 5 C 4-2 6 0- 2 6-- | _ | n -6/�4' /95 154.3? cu»L �r -*wpcnucm ncp^zn FARTS 1o~m4�O-�o�47 a~a^ �m36 166136 J6/C7,/85 ,op./o EARL poNDc�Scm ! sz z~�a -------- '' . 992.95 ° - - �'' --~ -L )! ' ` = 0 v i , , 2 2 2 1• 1 2 2 2 3 s 3 3 s 3 3 3 4 a 41 4, s� a a: s a. a: 19+15 Y OF FDIN� rurry *!1_ )LT.- A Mi111A1T CHECK ISTER C6 -17- PAGE 7 II CAI nnO 168138 06/12/8° 2.51 EO PHILLIPS & SONS CCRRECTICA 50- 3710 - 000 -CC 168138__ C6 /1Z /f5 2.51- ED PHILLIPS & SONS CREDIT 50- 3710- 000 -00 168138 L6/12/85 2.51- ED PHILLIPS & SONS CREDIT 50- 3710- 002 -00 168138 (.6 112 /F`. 81.50 ED PHILLIPS & SONS INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86 __- 168138 -- 125.40 ED PHILLIPS & SONS INVENTORY 50 -4628- 842 -84 204.39 • — — '-- - - - - -- 2 168139 —_ -- '6 /'4 8 5 - -- 79.50 EDINA ELECTRIC CO GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 i a 79.50 * - 168143 -),6/12/85 113.14- EMRICH BAKING CO CREDIT 27 -4624- 664 -66 168143 -.6/10/85 134. ?0 EMRICH BAKING CO CCNCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 3 168143 ;6/05/85 201.2.1 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSICNS 27- 4624- 664 -66 222. R7 + #fr — CKS ' 168154 ^6/11/E5 519.10 JCE ELIAS WAGES 27 -4100- 663 -66 519.10 + ' 1681>6 06/10/P5 6a.50 FAIRVIEY HOSPITAL PRO SERV 10- 4224 - 421 -42 68.57 + 168157 L6/10185 10.[10 50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN MEETING EXFENSES 10 -4206- 520 -52 tf.ff. fff -CKS I. f 168161 O6/06/p5 96.33 FLYING CLOUD SANTAR RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 353 -30 96.33 + ** *-CKS 168175 L6 /[6/85 76.38 FRITZ CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 76.38 • ` -' ---- '--- • #t -CKS —__ _— 166188 06/05/85 19.49 GRAY9AR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR FARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 168188 C6 /C5 /f5 24.47 CRATBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 48.96 • • • # # t w 168191 06/12/85 124.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 - 124.89 + # +# -CKS ; ] 1985 CITY OF EDINA rurrtf hr_ nArC .un11\Ir CHECK REGISTER CE -17 -85 PAGE 8 - -- -' --- - -- - MV V Von 1 nV. i n.. a 1. .0 '1 2 ' UrNE3AL_C�IMUNI_CATNS E9UIP MAINT 10- 301 -30 4 16o194 Jo/'�4/?5 31.70 GENERAL C ^MyUNiCATNS CONT REPAIFS _4226- 10- 4248- 44C -44 J� a a 1681 S4 •• "6 /l1' / °5 100.?^ GENERAL COMMUNiCATNS RADIO SEFY 10- 4294- 42C -42 e e 165194 D6/C4/85 377.50 GENERAL ClMMUNICATNS RADIO SEFY 10- 4294- 44C-44 7 168194 n6/C4/85 266.25 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10 -4294- 560 -56 e ` n 794.45 * 10 It „ + +a -CKS Iq 2 1082 ^6_! u6/ 612 5 547. ^0 G 8 K SER1iICS LA UNORT SERV 10- 4262 - 30_1 -31' •. A 168216 06%1'6/85 268.91 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY SERV 10- 4262- 560 -56 j4 1613206 06/C6185 191.35 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY SERV 10 -4262- 646 -64 5 6821 6!..6 6/E-`_- --_ 301.56 C 8 K SERVIC« LAUNDRY SERV 40 -4262- 801 -8C 9 1 . 3C9 .12 B 17 21 7' 10 19 ■. f f f • * ** -CKS 22 24 20 168209 C6/10/E5 53.71 GENUINE PARTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 2' 6$2 ^9___- _- ;.6/1t7L7?�_ _7. °2 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR RAFTS 10- 4540 -_ 560 -56 n 22 1682']9 16 /11'/25 139.12 GENUINE FARTS REPAIR PAFTS 1G -4540- 560 -56 ^� ' 166 2J L6/10/85 3.14 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARATS 10- 454C- 56C -56 =° 16e2!19 06/10/E5 27.50 GENUINE FARTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 3, 25 �c 225.29 * I 27 . ■�_ftr�.- - -- - - -- * *+ -CKS 3. 29 166213 6/12/85 24C. "0 LEROY H LIBBY SERVICES 40 -4200- 800 -80 3� 31 24C.00 ,] •faffa *** -C1(S 4: q. J4 16o22-i 16/11/85 1, ^81.1'8 HAR NED LU4BER CO CONSTRUCTION 10- 1422- 000 -00 35 16822C '.6/11/85 206.51 - VAR NED LUM8 =R CO CREDIT 11'- 1422 - 000 -CC " 3e 573.57 • A7 37 38 30 *■ f f f f * ** -CKS _ Sn n 40 16822F 06/11/85 101.46 HILLSTROM AUT) SUP Y GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 560 -56 - 41 168228 C6 /11/85 19006.52 HILLSTROM ALTO SUP Y REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 '4 1082.2+'• f-..¢_/,1/F5 198:00 HILL ST90M AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 a3 168228 06/11/85 29.54 HILLSTROP AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PAFTS 27- 4540- 662 -66 i-7 44 49 168228 U6 /11/8'5 - _ -- 12*12 347. 64 • HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y PARTS 27- 4620 - 662 -66 �a fr 48 47 49 f f * f * • -._. * ** -CKS 91 e: e3 49 168234 06/06/85 5.25 I-OCTEN CLEANERS UNIFORM ALLOUENCE 10- 4266- 421 -42 95 ao al --- _.- -- - - -- -- 5.25 * �re 97 33 *** -CKS 70 v4 1.68 -236 61?7/8� 26.44 HIRRHFTFLn -q REPAIR PARTS 10-4546-520-52 77 `a S8 26.44 * - 73 74 .] ■ ■ ■f ** *af - CKS 7a 7 r s 1985 r OF 70INA ru' i ^K N/l_ rLTC AMnij NT CHECK ISTER • 0E -17 'AGE 9 u - Nn na TTrm nrzrRTPTTnN ArrnllAT Nn_ TN1l_ a D_n_ a NrzcArr 168238 _ ! 6/11/8.5 30.00 WM H MGCCY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 16623E u6 /11%95 18.']0 WM H MCCCY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 166 23F, 6/10/95 24.•70 WM H MCCOY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -45C4- 301 -30 72-.00 •fr*fa "- - -- rrr.CKS lb8244 6/10/85 215.00 FdYDF+l FURPHY - SERVICES 10- 4226- 708 -7C - -- - 215.00 * 168245 06/04/E5 66. '?9 ROBERT B HILL SALT 10- 45 38- 440-44 168245 `'6/C61E5 57.00 ROBERT B HILL CCNT SERV 27 -4200- 661 -66 123.09 * •aar.• *•* -CKS 16824x, 06/10/85 62.02 HARMON GLASS CJNT REFAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 u.:6/12/85 62.D2 * 168241; 100. "^ WILLIAM MOFFMAN POLICE SERVICE 10 -41CO- 420 -42 raft ** ••• -CKS 168253 66/10/85 26.50 HUFPHREY RADIATOR R =PAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 166253 C6 %1C /E5 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 53. ^O * • ► f * * f + +• -CKS -_ 162i271_____�Q61121E5 - - 147.49 INTER PACKAGING CO* INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 147 .4 9 f - - - -- _�_. . *•art + +• -CKS 166277 06 /16 1p5 52.50 CARLSON PRINTING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 52.50 * 166218 :o/14/85 58.69 JERRYS FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 26- 4512 - 689 -EE le8276 06/11/85 10.00 JERRYS FOODS CGNSTRUCTICN 26- 4624- 684 -68 168278 06%11/85 7.05 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSICNS 26- 4624- 684 -E8 76.64 * 166219 CJ6111/85 1.99 JERRYS CUR OWN HE) WE F =S CCNST 10- 2220- 000 -00 �^ 16d275 66/11/85 7.C3 JERRYS OLR OWN HOWE GEN SUFFLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 168.279 06/11/85 7.03 JERRYS CUR OWN HO WE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -3C 168279 06/11/85 7.D 3- JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE CCRRECTICN 10- 45-4- 301 -3C 1¢0219 06/11185 1.70 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 _ ___168275 06/11/F5 6.48 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUFFLIES 10- 4504 - 400 -40 168279 26/11/F5 7.2.0 JERRYS OUR OWN HD WE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 166279 .;6/11/95 3.76 JERRYS OUD OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -454- 421 -42 16b2/9 06/11/85 5.64 JERRYS CUR OWN HCWE REPAIR PAFTS 10 -4504- 422 -42 166219 U6/11/t5 1.99 JERRYS OLR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440-44 168279 06/1118: 14.34 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 ,1985 CITY OF EOINA CH'CK REGISTER - 06 -17 -85 PAGE 10 rwrrr Ar_ m1 Tr AunuA1T ` __..___.__._�_,___� 11v11 .1t.U"I nu. 1nY• x r.U. H JJ - 2 168279 v6/11/85 9.30 JERRYS OUP. OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -45C4- 446 -44 2 _____. 166219_.._.____ J6/11/_85_____ Y 39.9.9 21- OUa0WN_HDWE rEV_S_U eIIfS 1�1- 450.4- 47C -47 3 ° 16'+279 :6/11/85 3.98 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -45C4- 480 -4E ° 160e /9 J6/11/95 3Q.95 JTPRYS CUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 520 -52 ° 1Eo2.79 6 /11 /85 14.54 JERRYS CUR OWN HDWc GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 ° 166279 06%11/85 800.87 JERRYS OUR flWN H7WE fEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 166279 66/11/85 15.84 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE 1ST AID 10 -4510- 440 -44 Ic 3��. ?2_ r- ...J,eRpj$ � i C_L�O.WN_ #IDNE R &PAIR PARTS 10- 4540 -_ 64_6 -6_4 a = 166279 L'o /11/E5 24.70 JERRYS OUR OWN' HOWE PINT _ 10- 4544 - 646 -64�- - --- - - - - -- -' 166219 ''6/11/85 56.34 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 166? 79 06/-11 /E5 204.50 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE TCOLS 1C- 646 -64 e ~� 168279 J6/11/?5 25.99 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE FIRE PREY _4580- 10- 4650 - 440 -44 1° 16o219 66/1118: 3.96 JERRYS CUP, OWN HO WE INVEN SUPPLIES 23- 1209 - 000 -CO " 166279 06/11 /q 5 12.48 JAR R Y_$ -0 U-_3_OWN HQWE; EGU TT `P M�IAT 27-4274_661 -6E F 168279 1 11 /E5 17.r7 9 JERRYS CUR DW \' HCNE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 661 -66 " 168279 J6/11 /85 P.06 JERRYS OLR CAN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 663 -66 22 10 188279 G6/1.1/E5 26.66 ir'RRYS CUR OWN He WE PARTS 27- 4620- 662 -66 2' ` 1662/9 06/11/85 15.45 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 _5 20 166279 J6/11/85 • 7.n89/� . JERRYS OUR OWN HCWE PAINT 28- 4544 - 708 -7C z� z' - �_1¢$2 :f 9..____ 6/1,1/ °5._ 09.0 JE�RY.SC_l'� C -'d RWE GEN_ Q P4_IES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 :_r 2z 168279 06/11/85 11.99 JERRYS CUP. OWN HOWE REPAIR PAFTS 40 -4 -4504- 863 -8C __ _ _ 23 168219 C6/11/85 2.29 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE REPAIR FARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 _" bti279 J6L11/85 3.98 JrRRYS OUR OWN HOWE REPAIR FAFTS 40 4540 8C6 8C 19429.10 • - 34 27 err.• a CKS - 79 o8283 1-6/11/P5 747.30 JONES CHEMICALS INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 689 -68 ..., 747.30 • e 31 33 arrrrr rrr -CKc a1 < 3°...._1682 E6 '!6/11 /E5 237.96 JUSTUS LUMBER CCNSTRUCTION 10- 1422 - 000 -00I° 97 1o62.�.6 „6/11/85 51.50 JUSTUS LUMBER CONSTRUCTIGN 10 -1422- 000 -OC 3e 289.46 • 47 37 30 3B ..r►rr rrr -CKS 4� -^ 3 °O 166239 6/12/E5 100.!C0 WALTER JOHNSON PCLICE SERVICE 10- 4100- 420 -42 _ 41 42 1()!)r ^^ a 5° !6 43 44 ..rrrr ••• -CKS 3) �n °S 12.776.00 VARRTS H a VER Co TnSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 ` 166292 06/ ^4/85 1.172. 0 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 560 -56 61 `7 7 139948.00 * 52 5° r r • -CKS - rc 52 1.512.35 TRTARCO ARTS ---& CRAFT GEN SUPPL 1ES 10 4504 624 -62 67 1•, q7 19512.35 * �_ - �� - -' - )O 54 53 rrr rt r • rrr-CKS ]1 7z 73 78 168300 06110/85 125.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC BASEBALL EQUIP 10- 4582 - 621-82 7 r r w .y s y b 19s 5 Y OF rO IN.+ CHrCK tv CATE �I z CHECI ISTER C6 -17- FACE 11 t OMnIIR1T UCRinCJ TTCU rCCr0Tn7TAU .rrnllfT ILIA_ Tau_ M o_n_ f u c Rrf ..- 168300 x6/10/85 1v9f6.OD KOKESH ATHLETIC SOCCER EQUIP 10- 4598- 627 -62 16a 3Q(3 Lb /1C /ES 272.55 K!7KESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 2_6- 4504 - 687_ -68 __. 1683U1)i ",6/10%85 102.64 KOKESH ATHLETIC CLOTH P.EFLAC 26- 4574- 687 -68 _- 2a476.19 •rraar aaa -CKS __. 1611312 _ 06/11/85 _5793.71_ KUETHER GIST CO INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 1683 ^2 01121 794P1.66 KUETHER GIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 139275.37 a f R f R a R 16 3.4 16/11/85_ 18.98 KNOX LUMBER CC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 1683 4 6 /1L' /E5 _ _ 101.?5 KNCX LUMB =R CO REPAIR P A F I S 10- 4540- 520 -5i �- 1o83v4 ''6/10/F5 35.09, KNOX LUMB E R CC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 16831'4 - 6/12/85 66.35 KNCX LUMR --- P. C0 LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 1633U4 061121F5 47.53 K40X LUMBER C3 LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 168'('4 06/12/85 16.18 KNCX LUMB,, =R CC LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 _16N3C4 L6 /C6 1E5 53.70 KNOX LUMBER CC LUMBER 10- 646 -64 1oa3t =4 6 /ii 6185 62.25 KNOX LUMB =R CO LUMBER _4604- 10- 4604 - 646 -64 1683U4 U6 /O4 /E5 5G.76 KNOX LUMB - R CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 1683L4 05/04/85 75.75 KNCX LUMPr-R CO REPAIR FAFTS 27- 4540- 66_2 -66 1683G4 C6 /C6/85 11.79 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -7C 165364 C6/C5/85 15.10 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -7C _168304 n6/r4/E.5 6.34 KNOX LUMB =R CO REPAIR PARTS 30 -4540- 802 -80 570.56 + - - -- - -- RffRa• +•• -CKS 168311 C'6/11111 4 n24.10 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 `168311:16 /12 /8 ! 5,a73.55 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50 -46.0- 842 -84 168311 6111/85 9 4C4.?0 EASTSIDE P_EVEP.AGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -E6 199302.35 + • +.rra ar• -CKS 166317 06/ ^7185 188.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS CEN SUPPLIES 10- - 322 -30 160-317 J6 /-7 /E: 27.63 LAWSON PRGDUCTS GEN SUPPLIES _4504 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1611317 ^6/[7/85 102.72 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4542 - 325 -3G 166317 6/n7/P5 348.31 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 166317 06/^_7185 168.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4620-560-56 _ 835.Q8 168315 [6/11185 111.75 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 440 -44 166318 Uo/11185 12.00 LEFF BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 611 -61 16831E C6/11/85 19. 110 L°_EF BROS INC LAUNDRY i7- 4262 - 662-66 141.75 5:555. - - - -- --- --- - - -.-- a r • -CKS 168325 16/lC/85 180. 10 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 _ 180 '0 • ra►rra •�r -CKS °v�: czr, OF c*ccx xcasrEn 0*-17-8 5 FA C E 12 :*cc* | ccc _---__----'u' INV. _*_p,o. -*.nccevo�___ ��L | 1*uar c*/r/p� zu�.�o /-x*�_�7x/`-cuuIp.-----'- REPAIR _FA 0_��^?- ��o- 5ei i ^^^rcxs - ' ,')9341 ro 7 /v5 *4.61 M m z INC) aunpu sEw uuppLzso 10~4504~560-56 44 .m . ^^^-cxc i-/ / 1 8 34 4 wiz/F 5 17.3* o70 nxvmcv m Euuzp cou/v pAz^Y 10 ~4 2 7 4-449~*4 � | 108344 Su/12/v5 17 .c5 pco nxvsc,4 u smuIp vxr Azo 19~4510~**0~44 _34.41 ^^^-cxs �. � - ! ! - ----------'--'--- v, .rs ---'------ ��r w wxorc c � mm aon pcn�o ,o~ovs~168346 000-c __--_-- -__ -' '__!� � . / 10 951 s.75 ^ _ ­-C KS --1 c3 5.1 _--�/'-4 ! ''^'" ~ [' | | lo835 3 'o/n/�r Mz*mErmv oLax- ' o"m muppcIso 10-4574-301-32 _ 168�53 5 :f%N SOT! G . �1 S-UPPLTE 16u353 -u/lo /m s».ao pzwmTsor^ amvc ocw uuppLxco 4c~450+801~80 —'--' 171 .20 | �uu3 5 4 o/12/ 5 61. 72 xTNmcxnaLzn ;AS co *cAr 1c~4254~446~44 | wn-)54 `6/12/s5 , »3 'o p�xmc�"nu� s»� co *c�r - - �o �z,� �oO-�D _ _168 3 5 4 _--vma/ 5 � �« �r4 2 5 4_52 0_ � mx/»+ cur,»/ E 5 1m.24 pr NNE xpoLzz sxs co wc^r 10-4254-540~54 - - ' 1ex354 cunz/o� lo :0 yImwE Apnus suo cu ucxr ,o~4 2m~6 29~6 2 � 166354 -6/1 i/�- 5 '_--_-1-21^? 3___-_--p1 ^mcupoL1 s 5 t co --- ___��^r ,u8 J:) 4 r6/1 2/�5 6. 33 p'xncucn/7s n^S CO ____10~4254~6.46-e4 *cA/ 2r~11 30~OcO~oc ' 166354 /1 2/o5 »1.^2 p1mmEx=zL/s o'n CO *cAr 2 3-4a5 4~611~61 |� � 16u�45+ �6 /`2/e5 EAT 2Ir4 2 5 4-a6 2- 6 6___ [ ,v8354 c6 / 1z/«5 3.Po mzmwcopoLIs n^a co xrx7 28~425*~708~70 --------------'--/ / l"635* z6v12/95 85.n* pzxnE^noL-s oxa ce wsx7 40~*2 54~801~8 o / � 168354 6/12/e5 '-_ '-_--__-35 5 .j 4Mzwm,E^EVL '$-(jAs­uV'----._-*cxr4 2s*-on3_8o | | 166354 �6/1z/u, 3.710 p7nwcunoLzS GAS. CC *s^1 53 ~42 5 4~8 31~9 2 / | Iuo54 '-o/1x/o5 16.'* pTmwcupoLIs sux co * --- ^r 50~42 5 4~841~8 4 . _ l^u354 z+/104s__-- 1,nol.3r ^ ���� '------ - -- - ' ^^^^°° - —'---------'-------------------------____-_--'__-_--____--___-____-_-_--- ----' -- ^^^-ms 1 '1 mrns �wa�az 232.+5 nM uLIpw SERVICE ALARM acno 27~43 0 4-66 0~6 6 -- - � - ' | 16 6 3 5" *n1/8 5 111.96 MINN `nmo zmc ecpAT" p*Frs 27~4540-*62-66 l' r r v r r r r r r e 19P5 Y OF �OIKA rurrr *n- n.1 TC .YnIuT CHECK ISTER C6 -17- PAGE 13 ----- - - - - -- -- 111.96 • - -- .. � v u n . �• L n .. r. v. N 1'I L J J P V C i 168361 C6/C7/85 31.07 MTNNE$OTA WANNER CCNT REFAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 168360; 'J6/ ^5/E5 1,625._0 MINNESOTA WANN =R CCNT REPAIFS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 16o36? o /'7 /85 6.21 MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUfFLIES 10 -4504- 328 -30 16836[' C6/'.7/E5 1Q.25 MINNESOTA WANNER CCNT REPAIRS 10 -4504- 646 -64 168360 C6 /CA /85 116.!g0 MINNESOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 40 -454C- 811 -80 1.798.26 + * * * ** z + ++ -CKS r ' 168362 `?6/10/85 121.7 C r MOCEL STOUc _ CMPANY GEN e UFFLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 " 168362 „6/10/85 309. °'6 MODEL STCN= COMPANY CONCRETE 10 -4528- 301 -30 '_ —__ -- 1x8362_._ _ =6/1..185109.79 MODEL STON- COMPANY CASTINGS 10 -4552- 345 -30 B 166362 v,6/1C/85 1.596.97 MnCEL STCN= COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 803 -80 B 29137.52 3 *** * ** * ** -CKS —_ 1 36 1_6 „/1_2/85 10�.00 BERT MERF_L0 POLICE SERVICE 10 -4100- 420 -42 : 10n�nn t — 168__66 Q6 /11 /E`5 324..35 MINNESOTA PAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 ' 168366 06/12/85 574.76 PINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 -8 842 -E4 ' 168366 36/11/85 593.21 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 1 492 .32 + * ** -CKS 168370 06/11/85 16.40 MTDLAND PRODUCTS CO CEN SUPPLIES 26 -4 C4- 84 -68 168370 06/10/85 273.70 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSICAS 26- 4624- 684 -68 290 .10 * — - -- - - - - -- - - -.._— _ _ 166371 06/C7/?5 254.80 MILHOFF STEEL CON7 REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 254.80 * ** * * ** _- ***-CKS 1083,79 66/12/85 109147.60 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 16637?' U6/12/85 109147.80 MARK V11 SOLES INC iNVENTCRY 50 -4630- 822 -82 _1663/8 ;6/12/85 109147.80- MARK VII SALES INC CORR -CTICK 50 4630 822 1663/8 06%12/85 129570.70 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY -82 50 -4630- 842 -84 168378 - -- - - -- - — L16/11/8`. - -_ —_ - - - -- 129835.05 35,553.35 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 r 168379 06/24/85 35.40 METRO FONE COMM EQUIP FENTAL 10- 4226- 301 -3C _ 35.40 * 1¢8380 06/12/85 99667.70 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10- 4100 - 220 -22 - - - - - - -- . _ — ... —__ 9.667.00 * 1663 81 G6/C4185 120.70' STAR 8 TRIBUNE ACVERTISING 10- 4212 - 600 -60 166381 06/04/85 30.[•1 STAR S TRIBUNE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4564 - 600 -6G , 1683 F1 'j6/C4/85 266.25 STAR & TRIBUNE ACVERTISING 23- 4214 - 610 -61 7 416.25 + 77 7 19'5 CITY OF 'O!N- CHECK IN':. - C =TE_. _ I ICI CHECK RE(i!STCP. CE -17 -85 PACE 14 QUNT V �IA.9_' ITEM DESCPjP?ICA A�COUAT K0.- TAV...__p_P.O. p MESSAO= _.____ + *+.•CKS 1f:03 °3 _6/r6/°_ 25. 0 MRLS C)MC TREKS WATER I I ' I' _ _1683Y1 1663 °5 6/1Z/85 1083=5 ;_b /12/t5 "i 1633G1 = = 6/12155 1683 ^5 --6/12/F5 I I ' I' _ _1683Y1 i 166'' -91 X X6/12/85 I 166391 _ _6/12/85 "i 1633G1 = = 6/12155 1f ?391 9 9/12/E5 16'3Q1 6 6/12[/?5 16b391 C C6 /12/85___!_ 160391 1 1:6/12/ ?5 1t83o1 C C6/12/F5 166 39 1 6 6/12/F5 _6/12/115 150391 _ _6112/Fi _ _188391_ 1 16/12/ I,_I 1 166391 U U6/12/ ?5 166301 - -6/12/85 168'391 7 76/12/85 I_" 1 1633.1 X X6/12/55 ___.. .16o391 li 16c3'�6 1oE396 _I I 1 6 396 168346 41-4258- 801 -2: •• - -CKS yCGUIRE =)BERT C)RRECTICA 1U -4242- 353 -37 1 °,0.''_ MC GUIP.E POECeT IASFECTICA 10- 4242 - 353 -30 lP ^0 hCGU'R° 'OB17RT TRE -_ - _ __ 10- - -30 720. =0 NC GUI RI ?OtlERT TREE 1NSfECTICN J EO- 1300 - 015 -18 onn -.n . I�. +++.CKS 273.x1_ N.S.' . CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 -_ 301 -37 12.207.31 N. S.;) CCYPANY ✓LECTRIC 10- 4252 - 321 -30 - -- - - - - - 9.174.32 N.S. ?. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 322 -30 1.,73 ?.43 ._-- -- N.S.P._ CO -'PAN - - _ -_ _ -- __;LE CTRIC_- _- ,._ -__-- _10-4252- 33C -3C - - -- : 206.34 N.S.o. CCMPANv _LECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30 9 -.54 k.S.P. CCMDANY = LECTRIC 17 -4252- 358 -30 1,6On._8 N.S.P _COMPANY _ ELECTRIC 1C- 4252- 375 -30 226.77 A.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 44C -44 39.63 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -4E 344 .1 3 A.S.P._COM�AhY.-- -- .---- . - -__- ELECTRIC_____- -- .---- - -._10- 4252 - 570 -50. 2.275.62 N.S. -- . C.C,4PA^JY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 520 -52 05 7.34 A.S.P. C01 ?AVY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 54C -54 561.29 N.S.P. Cc MPPNY __ E_LECTRIC ;_ 10 -4252- 629 -62 11.34 K.S. ?. COMPANY !-EAT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 "I 2,357.85 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 646 -64 13.° 34.S.P_..._C14P.ANY.�._ -_ -- -- =LECTRIC,------ -. -_ -- - -- __,2?- 1130 - 000- Cu._ -- 32Q.56 A.S.P. COMPANY = L- ECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61 1Q.)? N.S.P. COM °ANY HEAT 26 -4252- 689 -6E _ 24.54 K - S.P. COMP AN. K , LECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68 1,6lo _ c A.S.P. CCMPANY CONSTRUCTION -- - 27 -13CC- GOO -03 - - -- - - 90°. ?4 K.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66 86.79 A'.c- ?.COklOANY- _CTRIC,_ 27- 4252 - 662 -6E - 2,226.86 �� -- A.S.P. CO`iPA,)Y ELECTRIC----- - - -- 28- 4252 - 708 -7C 166.16 N.S.P. CO MPA�IY ELECTRIC 29- 4252- 721 -72 �. ___337.73 N.Q.P. COMPANY _LECTRIC 40- 4242- _8C4 -EC 29071.55 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252- 801 -80 17,945.41 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 803 -E0 _582,7_5._ _ .N,h - .- CC109ANY,._. :LECTRIC 50 -4252- 821 -82. 1.C33.67 A.S.P. COMPA:'JY C.LECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -E4 426.97 K.S.P. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 861 -86 - 59,74973 + +++ -CKS += 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ -- 6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON= :6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N 06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE 06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE 10- 4226 -160 -1E 10- 4256- 46C -46 _10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _ 10- 4256- 51C -51 10- 4256 - 622 -E2 I�. +++.CKS 273.x1_ N.S.' . CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 -_ 301 -37 12.207.31 N. S.;) CCYPANY ✓LECTRIC 10- 4252 - 321 -30 - -- - - - - - 9.174.32 N.S. ?. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 322 -30 1.,73 ?.43 ._-- -- N.S.P._ CO -'PAN - - _ -_ _ -- __;LE CTRIC_- _- ,._ -__-- _10-4252- 33C -3C - - -- : 206.34 N.S.o. CCMPANv _LECTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30 9 -.54 k.S.P. CCMDANY = LECTRIC 17 -4252- 358 -30 1,6On._8 N.S.P _COMPANY _ ELECTRIC 1C- 4252- 375 -30 226.77 A.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 44C -44 39.63 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -4E 344 .1 3 A.S.P._COM�AhY.-- -- .---- . - -__- ELECTRIC_____- -- .---- - -._10- 4252 - 570 -50. 2.275.62 N.S. -- . C.C,4PA^JY ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 520 -52 05 7.34 A.S.P. C01 ?AVY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 54C -54 561.29 N.S.P. Cc MPPNY __ E_LECTRIC ;_ 10 -4252- 629 -62 11.34 K.S. ?. COMPANY !-EAT 10- 4252 - 646 -64 "I 2,357.85 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 646 -64 13.° 34.S.P_..._C14P.ANY.�._ -_ -- -- =LECTRIC,------ -. -_ -- - -- __,2?- 1130 - 000- Cu._ -- 32Q.56 A.S.P. COMPANY = L- ECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61 1Q.)? N.S.P. COM °ANY HEAT 26 -4252- 689 -6E _ 24.54 K - S.P. COMP AN. K , LECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68 1,6lo _ c A.S.P. CCMPANY CONSTRUCTION -- - 27 -13CC- GOO -03 - - -- - - 90°. ?4 K.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 27 -4252- 661 -66 86.79 A'.c- ?.COklOANY- _CTRIC,_ 27- 4252 - 662 -6E - 2,226.86 �� -- A.S.P. CO`iPA,)Y ELECTRIC----- - - -- 28- 4252 - 708 -7C 166.16 N.S.P. CO MPA�IY ELECTRIC 29- 4252- 721 -72 �. ___337.73 N.Q.P. COMPANY _LECTRIC 40- 4242- _8C4 -EC 29071.55 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252- 801 -80 17,945.41 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 803 -E0 _582,7_5._ _ .N,h - .- CC109ANY,._. :LECTRIC 50 -4252- 821 -82. 1.C33.67 A.S.P. COMPA:'JY C.LECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -E4 426.97 K.S.P. CCMPANY ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 861 -86 - 59,74973 + +++ -CKS += 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ -- 6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON= :6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N 06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE 06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE 10- 4226 -160 -1E 10- 4256- 46C -46 _10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _ 10- 4256- 51C -51 10- 4256 - 622 -E2 += 6/'12/F5 - - - - -- 6'.25 NORTHa'ESTERA PELL- - FH0N_ -- 6/12/85 54.95 NCRTH'WEST-'RN BELL PHON= :6/12/85 4 -2,45 N_2RTHWE_ST;.lk-13UL IELE?H01N 06/12/F5 3,693.70 NCQTHWEST-6RN BELL PHONE 06/12/E5 457.32 NOPT1jWEST'RA P,ELL =HONE 10- 4226 -160 -1E 10- 4256- 46C -46 _10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _ 10- 4256- 51C -51 10- 4256 - 622 -E2 10- 4226 -160 -1E 10- 4256- 46C -46 _10 -4256- 500- 50,_____ _ 10- 4256- 51C -51 10- 4256 - 622 -E2 I r r r r r r r V r r 1965 OF r-DINA CHECK ISTER 06 -17 -1 'AGE 15 rHFrK Nr_ fIATF 8MMI1NT urRnnp TTru rrzrGTOTTn AI IlrrmfKT IJA- T6111_ h O -/+.- A mrccArr E 1o8396 06/12/85 19.45 NCRTHWESTERN BELL PHONE 10- 42'.6 - 646 -64 ,166;96 _ -- 06/12/85 132.33 NORTHVESTERN__8ELL PHONE 23 -4256- 611 -61 1663°6 C6/12/Q5 53.38 NORTHWESTERN EELL PHONE 26- 4256- 689 -6E 16d3ot u6/12/8S 335.71 Nf7FTHWEST: -RN EcLL PHONE 27 -4256- 661 -66 168396 __ 06/12/8_5 288.40 DCRTNWEST,- RN 8ELL PHONE 28 -4256- 708 -70 166396 06/12/85 46.98 NOFTHWEST =RN BELL PHONE 29- 4256- 721 -72 168396 06/12/85 7 ^05 NORTHWESTERN EELL PHONE 40 -4256- 801 -EO 168396 _ _ _ _ 06/12/85 210.30 _ NORTH_WE_STERN BELL PHONE 40- 4256 -- 803 -80 166396 06 /12 /AS 137.42 Af,RTWW- ESTcRA TELL PHONE 50 -4256- 821 -82 168306 C6/12/85 179.43 NORTHWESTERN HELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 841 -84 L_168396 - _ 06/_12/85 13 ^.92 NORTHWESTERN EELL TELEPHCNE 50- 4256- 861 -P6 5,914.01 r -- r. r r • - -- - -- -- - - --- rrr -CKS 1664`:[' '6/11/85 2.470.14 NOPTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUEES 10- 4616- 560 -56 2.470.14 • rrrrrr �10.10- rrr -CKS 1b 8a ^ -6 u6/75185 NTCC NW R_,ION CREDIT 10- 4540- 520 -52 1o64C,6 161 ^5/85 203.94 NTCC NW F=4IDN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 1o84r6 r6/'5/85 39.53 NTCC NW F - -GION REPAIR RAFTS 50 -4540- 321 -82 1684C16 C?6 /C5 /a5 54.7E NTCC NW FEGICN REPAIR PARTS 50 -4540- 821 -82 288.15 168413 ^_6/r5/85 381.64 NATIONWIEF PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 663 -66 3EI.64 • rrrra. 166420 :6/10/85 181.05 CLD DUTICH FOODS CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 1 F1 .0 5 • 166421 C6/C5/85 134.95 OLSnN CHAIN & CABLE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 643 -64 166411 _ 1_6/10/85 69.50 OLSON CHAIN & CABLE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 204.45 • - -- - - ---'- rrrrrr rrr -CKS 16b429 GW6 1E5 1,345.90 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CCNCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 16642906/11/85 218.75 PE "FSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632 -822 -82 168419 '6 /12 /E`. 357.25 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- _ 842 -84 168429 ^.6/11,/85 414.05 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 2.375.95 • .trrrr - - -� -� rrr -CKS {, 168433 C6 /12 /E5 103.68 FAUSTIC 9 SONS INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 1bR433 r6 /12 /E5 43.92 PAUSTIG & SONS INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 168433 0.6/12/85 65.06 FAUSTIC R SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 166433 t)6/12/85 65.88 CAUSTIC & SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 279.36 • 19F oT, m, rnz�` c*Ecv n".. coc °vu4 -5+ 16a^41 '^e4w 1,)6 443 'ox^�� |� ,ox4 5. ' | 1684 6u |'| 1684 en 1664 6L, H | — |. _( lob 4. 62 ' mt4e,� ^ ,*x4+� '-| ! ^^^^^^ ' — 1om4u/ (] 1or- r | | ../ � 1ue4/� [] l+u4v2 o/'5/o5 cx,-cw PEG! s/Ee c+~1r~u5 puCs 16 -10 Js x,_x_p,o. t pcssusF n6.va Ph' 'rM -Scxvzcc zNc _ uu�����,7 z0_f2 �4_70� 7C »6,n» ° - "= '-' �m12/x» ___-'--_a' 7 -RAG C' CO zxn^"n an,^L nEv`nA,;:" co »or.5o ° :6/12/�5 ~*/r6 /u5 a5. 2 5.`c ° i ^^^-cwx ' _--/*»Ew TOR r--'_-__ ---_- 50~**M~84 2~n*_- IxxcwronY 5o~46 30~8e2-8 + / °^^-cxs ' a'.no oIrsLLzTc znnumnIco ccwr ncxx ---------'---��^-cxs _[� || 27~*290-662-e6 ' -�'---�'-- -- -----------� --------_-_-_-_.-_ ' ~~^-`_ r ,�^/c+/�F 5 3 5 .6,0 THE pRzwr oonp pxouxxrs 10~42co~500~50 (. /vx T"cp�rwr spop' _paINlI0n 10.*6CV-628-t2 .� zzz.m ° - __ _ _____ _ _- ----_ .._^^^-ml-�1' �6/c4/uj 138 .Qu puwwEp mpe co cxnxAxmo 10~4200~500-50 - �a.,n_ ' �_po"nc�'wrscn � ------------� - 9.36 poc p*n/u 10~4620-560-56 9.36°-- ` r6 /l I/?s lRn.;o ROYAL onoww ncx (?^4632-822-E2------'-- -- ---- - -- C6/12 /?5 312 .2C' xnvAL cx04m e--x zwcmonv 50~46 32~842-8 4 0/11 /.95 362.30 -- xnvuL cnn�m_o�x__--__- zv«ENIORY �n-��������«� n5r,"" -- ' ' �61 6/n5 45z.0 0 ncmruL cuuzp & oxLcs cav cuppocx 10-45o*-353-3o c6/1C/b5 10x.qo _-___nswruL_EGuzp_v SALES Jcos vc~*58C-353-30 1153.70 RENTAL couIp o sucs -------10 mnLs ~ ^5oo ~ y53~ 3c---- |� -* o /�/t� 120 .I? xcwr«L souzp m sxLcs 5 cnv1cco 4 042 2*80 5E0 '- ---__-----_-___« cm 117 IF -_-__-_-_-'_-_--__--_-__---__- a 35. � wIcxp!cLc =Lopp o co _.--_----___-- cCmT REPAIRS - --- �������~�bz��� - - . 356.-0 ° / �m12/x» ___-'--_a' 7 -RAG C' CO zxn^"n an,^L nEv`nA,;:" co »or.5o ° :6/12/�5 ~*/r6 /u5 a5. 2 5.`c ° i ^^^-cwx ' _--/*»Ew TOR r--'_-__ ---_- 50~**M~84 2~n*_- IxxcwronY 5o~46 30~8e2-8 + / °^^-cxs ' a'.no oIrsLLzTc znnumnIco ccwr ncxx ---------'---��^-cxs _[� || 27~*290-662-e6 ' 19F5 OF EDI1 A rurr. nfn- fiLTr .unll ilr CHECK ISTER . 06 -17 'ACE 17 VENDOR ITEM DESCFIFTICA ACCOUNT NO* INV N P 0 N MESSAGE 60.n0 r frk ►if CKS 166485 2138.62 STATE BLDG IN SF BLDG PERMITS 10 -3095- 000 -CO 168485 E6/f]4/85 101. 170 STATE BLCG INSP SUR CHARGE TAN 10- 3113 - 000 -CO 2,839.62 rrrrrf rrr -CKS 16649' -- - - ^= 6/10_/85 - 111.60 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -3C ' rrr r i 111.60 * e, - • 168492 06/11/8`. 3.53 SOUTHDALE FORD REPATR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 164492 6/11/85 26.72 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARIS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 168492 G6 /11/x5 108.51 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1f-8492 06/11/E5 19.52 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 66492._`... -- 06/11_/85 _ -4_.26 S CUT HDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 5_60 -56 166492 Jo /11/E` 2.13 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 168492 '26/11/85 38.49 SGUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PAPTS 10- 454C- 56C -56 168492 06/11/"_ 42.36 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 245.52 -- 166493 - 06/11 /85 - 3,733.90 SCUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630_- 822 -82 168493 6/12%85 6,381).50 SJUTHSIOE DIST COI °IC iWVENTORY 5!'- 4620- 842 -84 --- - - - - -- 168493 '6/11/°5 596.20 SOUTWSTOE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 10,705.60 r trrrrr - rrr -CKS 1oP_S c .0/11 /E5 237.61 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CCNT REPAIFS 10- 4248 -5 560 -56 - 168502 = 6/11/65 12.5r SUBURBAN CHEVROLET R EPAIR PAPTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 166502 ^._6/11/8` 18.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PAFTS 1C -4540- 560 -56 158502 06/11/85 11.36 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 1685f2 ^6/11/E5 11.47 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PAF1S 10- 4540- 560 -56 201.73 : 16853 ^,6/05/85 14.34 SUBURBAN 'LUMB SUP REPAIR PAFTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 -_ 164503 6/r5 /85 169.75 SU9URRAN PLUMP_ SUP REPAIR PARTS 1C -4540- 520 -52 16656 C W,5/25 80.30 SUPURBAN PLUMP SUP REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540- 54C -54 j 16E5 3 C6/C5/85 16.50 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PAFTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 _1695 ^3- _____.,_g6/C5185 - 77.22 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PAFTS 30- 4540- 801 -80 I, 1685n3 C6/ ^5/85 34.49 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PAPTS 30- 4540- 802 -80 - 392.60 r ••f rf f - - -- - "- rrr -CKS 85 g-5 _ ^6 2500 SUN DUES 10= 4204 -_ 600 -60 1o85C5 Q5�04/i5 10.99 SUA ADVERTISING 1,7- 4210- 14C -14 - -- 168505 Co /C4125 20.42 SUN ACVERTISING 10- 4210- 140 -14 1o85(115 Cb/12/85 11.81 SUA ADVERTISIEG 10- 4210- 140 -14 68.22 r rrrrrr I rtr_CKS .1? "F5 CITY CF CHECK REGTST_R CE -17 -85 P A GE 18 C HE CK N'. DT= P MOUqT —_v O­;ErS­CF1ET_j_q_N_ ACCOUNT ST PAUL -ECOK G:'N-sueRL 11 10- 4 5 0 4- 4 2 0- 4 2 h 5_6 h/1 -4 55 7.2C'- Sr ?9 UL 8 ) CK C PE r. I T 10-45C4-510-551 I - 5` .6/11L "5 1 1 4 ST PVJL. R,' 1 K OFFICE SLFPLIES 10-4516-140-14 15051,° ;'6 1 ^/ }5 .79 ST PAUL-C-10K LFFIC-- SUPPLIES 10-4516-160-16 ST PAUL E^OK OFFICE SLFFL',ES 1�'-4516-510-51 10 N5 3 b / ^4/E5 96.43 ST PAUL 8 Q' F?K CFF ICE S LPPL I E S 10-45 16-510- 51 CK S 100 51' 5 66 ^.;`0 FATT BULLOCK COST RENTAL 10-4200 -642-64 6 6 C 0 .0/11 /C5 25.05 S7LTIE4.14 u1CUU'1 SFRV SERVICES 50-4236-861-E6 25.05 lb 9 51 e '-o /10 5 14 . PO s 3068 1C -4504- 646 -E4 GEN SUPPLIES 14.,qO C K 1 -16.40 G5N SUFFLIE-S 10-45C4-54C-54 I r1l 6.4 ^ — ---------- C K S d 15±522 1 21t 5 91F?5.09 STANDARD .)IL GASOLINE 13- 4612 - 560 -56 - 2 b /12 /F5 9 STANDADD--r'IL GASOLINE 10-4612-560-56 63,6 R 7 *■• -CKS IS 52 6 '_b /CS /r5 1 20.''0 TRACY OIL CO GAS CLI N-7 10-4612-560-5t R20.'�O 40*-CKS 15052° o/ -6 /8 5 46.54 TWIN CITY ELZVATJR CONT SERY 1'3-42CO-52C-52 46.54 ­CKS 116511 -,6111/11 31 Q.'0 16,537 0t) /1?4 / E 5 474.)0 TRT STATE DRILLING CCNT REPAIRS 40-4248-801-8C 6 5 3 1 6/74 /8 5 — 474 _ DRILLING NGL— 4 0-4540-302-2e) 32 TAI S'AT!: DRILLING REPAIR PAF7S 4,-4540-805-30 1 75- .--0 17 47.31 1; 7!J S U P P L S 27- 4504- b61 -66 19.5 1 OF 70 IN+ r Wrry Af_ nLTF AuNIUT CHECK ISTER VC Un no I ro Tn T Tn.� C6 -17- 'AGE 19 47.33 * 16N542 = A /11 /95 119499.98 THORPE GIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 -- 119499.98 * ... :.. ++•-CKS 160551 �6/C61P.5 - - ^ -- 473.30 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266 - 420 -42 10�i51 j6 / "6 /95 379.63 UNTFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLCW 10 -4266- 421 -42 1o85i1 C6/76/P5 44.110 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWENCE 10- 4266- 422 -42 z 1085 1 r6/ ',16/o5 155.28- UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CJRRECTICA 10 -4266- 422 -42 168551 U6 /C6 /E5 155.28 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266 - 422 -42 1o8551 06/ ^.6 /P5 155.28 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALL06 10- 4266 - 460 -46 191752.21 f f f i k f * +• -CKS 1o8553 C6/'?4/85 19696.97 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 322 -3C 168553 ^6 /C5 /85 195.13 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 322 -30 108553 _- _C6 /r5 /85 42.79 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 168 53 ^6/' -5185 467.75 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP P.EPAIR FARTS 10 -454C- 520 -52 ' 'otti553 t_W5 /P5 25.94 UNITED ELECTRIC CGRF REPAIR P A F I S 10- 4540- 52C -52 168553 r6IC518 5 3806 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR FARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 ?68553 C6/05/85 291.24 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 168553 U6/ ^5/85 78.23 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 1oR553 '16 /C5 /p5 4 ^-.61 UNITED ELECTRIC COPP REPAIR FARTS 10 -4540- 646 -64 ?08553 ^- 6 /C5 /si .114.05 UNIT O ELECTRIC COPP REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 661 -66 108553 ^61'5/85 45.39 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR FARTS 27- 4540 - 661 -66 1o6553 553 uo/ 5/85 501.35 UNIT =D ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 28- 4540_- 708 -70 1o8 C6 /C5 /E5 49.31 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR FARTS 50 -4540- 861 -86 3.585.42 * . 16o5o_6_ - u6/11/85 493.00 VICEO iM4GES CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -CC * *+ -CKS 1o85o6 06/C7 E5 133. ?0 %IDEO IMAGES CABLE TV 10- 2149- 000 -00 626.20 * • f f f t . -- - + +�- CKS..- 158569 - - 06/C6/85 133.52 VALLEY IND PROPANE GASCLINE 28 -4612- 707 -70 130.52 * ... -CKS -- -- ---- _ 166512 06/12/85 99.60 VAN PAPER CO GEN SUPP 10 -45C4- 52C -52 168572 06/l2/E5 53?.25 VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUFF 10- 4514 - 520 -52 637.85 * - - -- ......- .. - - -- - * ** -CKS - 1605!3 L6 /10/65 19E10.46 WM.H.2IEGLER C, INC CUNT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 _ 1 9810.46 + 168579 06/10/E5 31 .63 WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 45C4 - 301 -30 1 rzTv OF N. 75.95 rzoucsr eooc c*ccx ncaorce 23~3265~000~00 | nt- 17~85 pms 23 � c"ccx �r. s�`c _ x�cu ��_-_-_-_r�c cc0}�I_H�,_J�x^_o���~.-*-��c��«� /. | 1,53 5 7v rm`n/n5 54.c2 w/LLz^ps urEcL.eou~ csu nuppucs 110~4504~52c-52 !' = 1 ^u5/" E !��.�� — -----' �z���vwn_�r���,wo�� ----- Jcn� 1����yO-�����o-' ze.zo ^ -'- `. [ � `] cxs_|�| 15m5 ^/ an1 /x5 502 .67 t8 7- GORDON oM:r* c-) nuanLIwc 27~4 6 12-662~6 6 wrpx srLo I^ar2 .w"4 1 e5 631 .95 �poYwzrx o- _ ' —o cL;NE7~4alZ-6o2_u+ ,1»4.^2 _^^^-cws i `oatpao cu `5n5 38.93 w w onx IN" ca pspAzn pAxn 10~*540~520~52 |� lbu5n `,/e5/v5 46 .90 '__---u 6 sp^mGcn REP ^z§�-F ;pro 1o~4s^ Cl- 5zn~5z__- / ' = u , � ' ' r � . � _ 6 � vn�/m�sn qspozR p»Fm IC~454O~520~52 'u.5 /S5 4."4 w s*^rmr�cn RcpAzR p^Frc 10-454c~540-54 ' , *156 5 �,/.�/»�_-_-_ �1��� NIEx __R� -__. 413.02 ^ _ / °°^-cx 3 .� /l -' u5," ] �//z ,o - o cNR, uacacxx' poLzcc ssxzcE m w[C 42n *2 [ | 1�u�y� /w�z/�^ ' ov.oi cccsL/A uyIn+ wzLcec 10~*2u6~1*0~14 | »"^`��- -- '- ------ --- — ---------- ----- ----_ -- _ � 116ez r4/�5 ---'o4.4o p1r c�*rnAL pzas ocw ouppLzcn ' o~4sc4-*v~44 � --_n«592.' �'*�4/us-_-_--__--_'-l2�^" �u_�/���l�s g-450*-44s-44__-_'-- | 1mo� »z.r - wzn cswrnu� rzp� cuom�no ;Epmcc �c~w ' | , | -------------'-----'_--__-_--_--___-' 17. 30 PzxwEE-SnrA CLAY _ -__- zNxcwronv cuppL/cs �_- --_ 23~12n9-000-oO | | 1= 6 5v 3 `"/14 44.50~ xIwvcsnrx cLx, c"s01r 2 3-4 5 8x~61«-6, lC-�-_--_ �-! . | `om`4 cur4,E 5 3 .604.16 a/onc rncwr xcmwTccs 10~*e4-50 4~5c ' � 604.16 _�________ - ---'---'------- . 1686 , � '6/'5/F5 75.95 rzoucsr eooc oowxrzowo 23~3265~000~00 | 75.95 ^ /| ..,`" ~ �uuIc` _-14. v�s�a�I���9wCRx__S CL J��s��6-25~000-oo_ `] z",u ---- t8 7- '01' 5/,5 zv p^x oruzsLr-/ wrpx srLo 27-3625-ono-or, 1 4 i ' ---i�1 / I6F5 f OF rDIN-3 rw,-rw Rn- ntTP' A mnl I KIT CHECK ISTER I C6 -17 -1 ;flGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. rNw. N P.O. A MESSAG-- 2100, * iF3719 5 29.40 MAUREEN EROCK6AY WORK SCLE 23-3625-000-CO ---'16/05-/85 20.40 * 7.,00 JO FRENCH WORK SlCLC 23-3625-000-CO 7.00 • 21. ^C PAT GREER %ORK SCLE 23-3625-GOO-00 21.'0 • 168777 06/15/85 94.50 AN HAEFLE WORK SOLC 23-3-625:000-00 94.50 * loe 7-q ''61-51F� 7.66 BARB HANS01 WCRK SCLD 23-3625-000-00 7.66 * 1687n9 u6 %r5 /8`. 5.25 BARB "ARRTCK WORK SOLC 23-3625-000-00 - - -- - 5.25 68 7 1' 16871 " J6 fr:5 8 5 2A.00 BARB LUNDGREN WCRK SCLE 23-3625-000-OC 28.10 * 168711 06/05/85 10.15 MARGARET MCDOWELL WORK SOLO 23-3625-000-OC 10.15 * 168712 "6/C5/85 3.4C E---TT7- OLS14 WORK SCLE 23-3625-000-OC 8.40 * 166113 U6/C5/E5 5.60 CLARICE OLSON WCRK SCLO 23- 3625 -00 - 5.60 * 1o8714 C6/i5 /E5 4.20 BETTY PEDDIE WCRK SCLO 23-3625-000-00 4.20 * 168715 C6/C5/E5 38,50 MOLLIE PAULSON CCNT SERV 23-42CO-610-t1 38.5U 168716 .-6/05/E5 4.20 LOIS PETZ---L REFUND ART CENTER 23-3500-000-00 4.20 r-- 168717 J6 /O5 /85 3.00 SUN COUNTRY ENTERP TYPE SETTING 23-4 2 04- 610- 6 1 -20. 166 1 IR U6/0/85 ^0 NACMI JOHNSON PAYMENT AFT CTR 23- 4504 - 611 -61 20 . (� 0 168715 26/C5/E5 49667.50 GORECKI & COMPANY STUMPS 10-4200-353-30 4 P'P,6 7 . 50 * 16872' C6 /C5 /E5 84. "0 BILL DIETRICHSCN INST ART CTR 23-41CO-614-61 94.90 * 168721 Q6/C5/E5 30 10 a MARGARET LEE INST ART CTR 23- 4100- 614 -61 30.00 t. 19F5 CITY OF EDIN%. CHECK REGISTER C6 -17 -85 PACE 22 rucrtr �!r_ n ?TC AMlltlfliT UCRRIra TTG'M r1CCrGTCTTPK Arrfl1INT N(1_ Tk1,_ M D_f1_ it NCQCAGC 2 2 722___- __C6-/.J5. /_8 -5- 1_21.0.0 MARION WARD INST ART CTR 23- 4100- 614 -61 3 4 4 S 0 12. ^.11 + _ -_ - -_ ] ° 168723 06 /r5 /E5 995•.':0 ARFS TREE SERVICE RrMCVAL 10 -4200- 353 -3C 7 0 7 0 995 .90 to ° _168724 _ -_- `:6/ ^5/85_•___-_ 61.25 DANS REGISI $ERV WATER TREATMENT 26 -4622- 682 -68 „ - 10 61.25 • a 4 168725 16/115/95 6.67 CCLLEFN PAULUS MILEAGE 10 -4208- 480 -48 tt ,4 6.67 + 14812F- __•_- .6/f_5/85 156.70 E- RgARDT COMPaNY OVER 'FaYMEAT 40- 3525 - 000 -00 .c 10 ,7 156.'0 • 2' e 168727 06/r6/F! 365.63 THE PETERSON GROUP WRONG APCLNT 40- 3525- 000 -OC 2' 168727 76/05/8! 365.63 THE PETERSON GROUF OVFRPAYMIZAT 40 -3525- 000 -00 ° 166727 06/C7/85 316.64 THE PETERSON GROUP CVERFAYPEAT 4C- 3525- 000 -00 z 727 - U.6 /..D4 /P �.� '65.53- �j P"TR50N GROUP CORFECTIIP 40- 3525 - 000 -CC 22 168727 6 /C.6 /8! 365.53- THE PETERSON GROUP CCRR-ECTICh 40- 3525- 000 -00 73 316.64 • 3 "') 24 166/28 J6/ ^.j /85 88.72 SUBURBAN DAIRY DIST CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 ° 27 88.72 • "I z0 - 168729 16/051E 215.98 215.98 CLOVER LEAF CREAM CO CCNCESSICNS - 27- 4624- 664 -66 - -- - - -�.3I 20 30 215.°8 _ 166730 06/115/85 250.00 CONALD HALL AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 168730 006/C5/F5 250 .70 -' DONALD HALL CCRRECTICK 10- 3180 - 000 -00 4_ �Ar 33 + 15 168731 :6 /r5 /E5 155.`0 CAROL KEARNEY APBULANCE REFCNC 10 -3180- 000 -00 4` 47I 155.00 * 37 30 168732 06/CS/E5 610.98 UNITED PROPERTIES OVERPAYPEAT 40 -3525- 000 -OC 30 -- ----- ----._- .-- 40 - - ---- -- 610.98 * 1-- 41 168733 06/C5/85 53.30 STEWART HAHN WAGES 10 -4250- 622 -62 - n2 _ 53.30 + 4- A4 168734 06/115/85 3013 ."1 CLEAN FLO LAB INDIAN 'HEAD LAKE 10- 2242- 000 -00 ]r .c at7 - ---- --- --; 47 166135 06/C5185 207.x.75.10 FIRST BANK MPLS UNAFP SURFLUS 66 -2490- 000 -00 p.. `c 207075.00 + e: 711 • f i f f i 7t frfwCKS �] S2 168137 06/x4/85 660.00 MPLS g SUB SEWER B CANT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 803 -8C -` 53 5. 660.00 • 70 71 7; 16873N 06/04/85 33.00 LEROY LISK CLEANING SUFFLIES 10- 4512- 440 -44 '= S0 �7 33.00 7 j 1 98 5 r OF ED INA CHECK N! DATE 3MOUNT CHECK ISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION C6-1 7-,' AGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. IAV. b P.O. A MESSAGE ~ 2 2' 3 _- 168739 C6V4185 - 41.71 EVELYN CARYSON OVERPAYPENT 40- 3525 - 000 -00 3 4 11.71 • ] A _ lbit74_ �6 /C4 /E5 32.60 PKN STDTE DOCUMENT OCCUPENTS 1C -4502- 490 -49 a 7 e 32.60 • iu ° 168741 76/4/85 _ 2_.50 RC IDENTIFICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 12_0 -12 loo 741 J6/�41E5 2.30 RC IDENTIFICATIONS C E N SUPPLIES 10- 45C4- 20C -2C -' " 10 °741 6/111E5 2.30 RC IDENTIFICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 200 -20 14I i2 168741 o /11tE5 6.-'0 RC I3r_NTIFICeTTONG GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 F 168741 06/10/85 7.59 RC IDENTIFICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 168741 06 C4 /85 2.JO RC IDENTIFICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 490 -49 a " 10 °742 6 /C4 /E5 445.63 EARRET MCVING FREIGHT 10- 4292 - 184 -18 " ° 445.63 • u 2= 168743 C6 /C4 /E5 75.99 CITY OF RICHFIELD CGHT & POSER 10- 4252- 345 -30 Z� 2, 75.''9 + 23 1o8744 16/C4/E5 1.000.70 KEMSSON INDUSTRIES CCNT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 301 -3C d, 26 166745 J6/04/85 1,467.08 HENN CTY TREASURER RLBBISH FEPCVAL 10 -4250- 353 -30 L467.�9 + 29 'lo8746 J6/'4/85 62.50 PARK NICOLLET PARK PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 260 -26 ' 3^ 1od746 :J6/C4/85 106.50 PARK NICOLLET,PARK PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 301 -30 3 3. 32 169. ^0 + �� 33 _- 168.747,__ -. -_ 06 /Q4 /E5 73 . OMNITRON RADIO E9UIF 10 -4914- 422 -42 :I 3] 73. ^0 • - - -- ..� 39 168743 06/C4/85 237.21 HILB ART a DRAFTING INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23 -1209- 000 -00 237.21 + 39 68749 _ __...�6<^.4_ 8_`_�__- _ -_ -_� 50•V0 -5 EDINA COMMUNITY CTR FOOTBALL EQUIP 10- 4592 - 627 -62 41 0 .7" - -_ -' - -- 1 - 1o87S�)_- 06/04 /N5 9.91 INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY REPAIR FARTS 40- 4540- 801 -EG - -I 9.01 • - "d 4� _ ____168751_ _._ _. 06./C4/85 - -- 270.'00 YL SEP,VICE LIGHTING REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 I_ 43 47 270.00 • 51 •1O_ 10 8.752 C6 /L'4 /E5 19.90 ACE MANUFACTURING REPAIR FAFTS 40- 4540 - 802 -8C c +J 4' !O 19.90 . 5CI 61 16875336/ '14/85 45.50 D C ANNIS SEWER CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 !3 70 5" 1687-)4 C6 /C5 /E`_ 250.00 SHORE AMBULANCE FEFUNC 10 -31fb- 000 -CC ]" !� 250.00 + l3 7" _�_6 6/85 762.91x' KLEENSWELL rnNT SERY m- 67nn- S7n -S7 7] . l"^5 r171 OF ":^^ cn7cn FEozsrFn ce~17~85 pAo7- 24 ' ' c*rc"�m. ' o.-c -' �°:V - ' ' �o�- '�.�._w wcs�w�_____ | � r�x,vD ^ !� � ��__-_.--------------- rcoc�xL �,Dxsn crw� ssRx r | lot m, 36/` '6'/E 5� ----------� .�--v - nuca �-�-10-4_ 2CO-500-50-----' ----- - L kIZveo 07-rz-o'm '----------pPLAGUES | n ° 62m4. � � ] m»/," _,*/'o/�� ,,:i5 5.04---- ':%?cRLAcH'n cCUwrsY -''PEcEPTION----------'-1�_w;C����~�� 1 1,�o.o4 ° ( ` / �*e/,v 'o��uu�- --- ' ----' --------------' oArrTmcno ocw ooppL TES - / ' vo~m�4�i�����------ 29.1' / 7v.�r ° ' !J �^rt /"� u *�'��-�--- , ^ -�-� ---' ' - I 7 ocrwTcc :wc --- -- ----------'------ :xsu*AmcE '- 1o~4zm-����vC / ] 6966 �.�c ° 16u71 1 06/`6m5 � - - ---'----------- --- -- - � »n-*z�*~mu-m ', - ''= -°." "uvEx/a,zns 1 1 rz ^ ~ � i � , ) ^ ,+/ s/c�/"� �s�./5 -- xzL'�SsaVzcEs -- -- —�--- -'c�m�����-------'----- ^`~' ~^~" ' - -- ~ ~ �o ��co-vzO �� ' 453.'5 ^ |` - -------------'-- joro~ns 87 .97 . ncp^zn p»nrs | �/p' 4C-671-6t '- ----- -- ' '- -- E z so rcxznIN | n7,p7 ^ �°1D,') /o^ Jm'6 /"� � ' 5m. - rLcn----- w0;' NOnuAcx ----'��ov���� --'-'----- ��~�������^~�� -- `uu/`~ z�/'o/e� �'.m r�m�.�cc vnvo^cx wzLcuoc . 1c~*208~184~1x | - ap�,a� / 1687+5 r6/a1c5 »°:D oLcnu x*nxnw ccnucE S 10~4120~184~1c '|~ mnr�� �o�ru/o5 1.96 -' -s��mwy� x~7w-�_-__ ' . 7.96 ° | � 16u766 � »/c«/�---- ------a � _ ���«�J�-��lpxc ER VICE3 � 1z~4120~84~18 � ' 7 o 6 | �m/rmm _16 ---' -- --- - ' ~m4-vc / ' ovr.va ° " ~ ./ ^0 67 6 1 'u/o 216.7,0 ----'HtRR'-`cL. N.- ---'--- ---S�RVzCES ------ - i -10_4120-194 - 18 - | lv�m/ )61-61x5 1 1.rn *«xav wcLzw n'�mac ' ~ �o~*ano m^~�u ���~, - � ' / 16h 7,S F mca/us o.7,c ^mrm 400o senvIccs --__-__-_-__---_-- -_- _- --- 10~4120~18*~18 /~ . - - a.�V-�__- ------ -'---------- '---- � - --- � 156 m9 F 5 �.o au« wouLcv ocporccS -- - vo~*v2O-1o*~vo ) �� / _ -_----_---------__--___- / . mur,, c6/-u/o5 1 o.79 r*csrcn CL' mxor scnvzccx _ _ 10-4120-184-18 �m 5 3^»2w8ol_--__'-�z�cx�c vo-��oo-vn^-�u � ' 13.`z ^ -------'------- - ' l 1uun1 - - �a/-um" `' EeV [ � '84- � |� / �^u//� | -6/761E5 ".'" ,^"vLu nxm/vnnxur MILEAGE 10-4208-184-18 ----------- 'j s o � ^� ° [J� . ° _ i I 9x5 r OF FOINA CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT 1 z 3 4 6 e ° A 21 z 2. 2 z 3_ 3. 3 3 3e r 36 31 36 3° 4v 41 44 f 4_ 46 47 n:l so 3, e2 53 e4 1J 36 CHECK ISTER 0E -17 -, 'AGE 25 _- 1,68772 C C6 /CE /85 _ 9 9.00 W WILLARD CTT S SERVICES 1 10 -4120- 184 -18 16b772 - J6/C6%S5 1 1 .3 9 L LILLARD OTT M MILEAGE 1 10 -42C8- 184 -1E 10.38 + 108773 0 06/Cb/85 1 113.40 P PAGNUSON SOD S SOD B BLACK GIRT 1 10- 4562- 642 -64 1o8773 J J6 /C6 /F5 2 2241.50 P PAGNUSON SOD S SOD 6 BLACK CIRT 4 40- 4562- 803 -8C 333.901 * lo8774 ' '6 /i7 /F5 1 117.52 W WEST WELD W WELDING SUPPLIES 1 10- 4610- 560 -56 1 11 7. 52 * 168775 . .s6/G7/85 1 160.. ?0 P PARCH DIST INC P PARIS 1 10- 46e0- 560 -56 16C'.r0 * 168176 C C6/ 7/85 1 13 ".82 J JIM HATCH SALES P PARTS 1 10 -4620- 560 -56 -, 19F5 CITY OF TOWN ru Cr. .r r) n TP Aunil IUT CHECK REGISTER GE -17 -85 PAGE 26 1 2 3 ___.1..6�7y_____..'96./_1OL£5 128.00 THE PRINT SFIOP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-510 -51 21 3� 4I 4 5 12Q.nC 5 16t379i, U6 /1Q /8 `. 1 .664'.1 3 H.O.M.E.INC RTI MBURSEMENT 10 -11 39- 000 -GO .I 71 n 7 o 1„664.13 ,o ' _1- 68791il6/1.U1 `_- ,_3_- EDINA PET H:QS•PITAL SERVICES 10- 4224 - 470 -47 0 65.67 *---- - - - - -- ; ` 16o/92 j6 /in 85 280.00 GLCMMER EVG � 10- 4248 - 560 -56 P 13 14 289.00 * oi 5 95.00n1 COPY JUPL ICA�NG GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 70i 16 17 4 5. -� V f - _- .- ._- �__ -___. 11I z7 ° 1od/94 �6/1CI85 67.37 HARMON GLASS GLAZING REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 -54 lZr 10 ro 67.37 f I -.I '' 168795 _�. ,o /10L�.5_ 4. -64 VECTOR ONr SUSSE RJR TICN 10- 4204- 140_14 `Z 168795 J6 /1L /85 4.64 VECTOR ONE SERVICE45 10 -4226- 420 -42 -� 23 Z4 3 " 168796 6/10'/8`_ 21.50 FRED VOGT & CO HEATING PERMIT 10- 3125- 000-GC 168796 Q, 6 /1 ES 11.50 FRED VOGT & CO GAS PERMIT 10- 3125 - 000 -OC 7 _S6- _ ------ ':'.b /.1G_ / ?5 -- -- _29._50 ��.C.D V4.SiT_g_C..C. hEA.TING PERMIT 10- 3125 - COO -CO -- `' 168796 ;6/10'/85 3.00- FRED VOGT & CO CLERICAL CFAFGE 10 -3800- 000 -CG 59.50 160797 u6 /10 /E`. 39664.52 LAM RELATIONS CCNT SERV 10- 4200- 140 -14 39664.52 * ^ <rl 34 16o79F X6/10/85 3,372.00 WEHRMAN CONSULTANTS CCNSTRUCTIGN 10- 1455- 000 -CG 3x372. ^7 ,7I r 3' 168799 :;6/10/85 269730.70 KENO CONSTRUCTION CCNSTRUCTIGN 27- 1300 - 000 -00 e so 39 �:6/10/E5 269733.10 • " _ 31?.70 SECURITY CONSULTANTS CCNT SERV 1C -42CO- 646 -64 1688 ^n 41 31.'0 • " 168801 ;6/10 /E5 348.63 ROLIN B CHILDS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 390 -30 ee 44 4'3 348.63 rr `8 168802 6/10 E5 15.57 EICE SAW SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -3C 16' -- 15.57 * P . " Iso 168803 06/10 /E5 62.09 GARDNER.HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 62.09 * 168804 ^6/1J/85 622.50 HENN CTY TREASURER RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 353 -30 622.50 * , 7^ 71 [';d 168805 06/10/85 34.20 IRMA KURMIS WORK SOLD 23- 36225- 000 -00 34.20 75 ' 19m5 . OF ,om° -'' cxscw zorcn ^~=°- ^-~~~` `--~ ----'--- co~1r~/ '^oc xr 180 C0 PICHON HESBST WCRK SCLC 23-36 25- GO G- CC 166S77 6/1C/F5 2 70 CKS c6/11/E5 260.00 DAY DIST IKVENTORV 50-4630-862-Et 168814 q6/11 /F5 2 31 .3 Z: GARDNER REFRID CONI REPAIRS 28-4248-707-70 168S 2'-1 06/11 /85 586.95 RTW INC INSLRANCE 10— 4 2 60— 510— 51 168821 �6/11/85 6, 550.27 VIDEO MlOwEST CABLE TV 10— 2 149— 000— 0 0 168F22 06/11185 36*00 GREATER, MPLS AREA OFFICE SUFPLIES 10- 4 5 16— 200- 20 1666Z3 -0/11/85 175 rQ UNIVERSITY OF PIN CONF & SCHOOLS 10— 42C2— 140-14 p s b v i P 1985 CITY OF ED INA rucry r,r n�tr CHECK REGISTER C6 -17 -85 PAGE 28 z 3 1017.44 z 3 ° 168825 6/11/85 13.50 POOLSIDE CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 689 -6E ' ' 13.50 + a � a 9 ' 168826 06/11/85 82.25 BROTHERS MGMT CORP CCNCESSICNS 10- 4624 - 620 -62 ' ° ° 82.25 + '° „ 0 1ti8 ?27 6/11/85 32.75 PRENTICE '-TALL SOOKS 10- 4502 - 600 -60 - - - -- —- -� - -'' z 32.75 * = 168828 06/12185 275.50 LARISA GRAUZE R.':GISTRATICN 10- 4100— X27 -62 14 275.50 * lA6c29 — 6/12/Q5 15.-0 MARY FtUICHER REFLNC SWIMMING 10 -35 CC— CCO —CO ” ie 15.00 ' 168830 96/12/85 15.00 LYNNAE ANDERSON REFUND TENNIS 10- 3500 - 000 -00 15.G0 `Z 168831 )6/12/85 15.r?0 MACY GILLIKSEN REFLND 10- 3500- 000 -OC -- 73 15.00 L 32 168832 C6/12/85 17.!?0 IAN FRYKMAN REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 —CC 3- 1, 17.00 • = -1 ° 168853 76/12/85 1,3C4.-4u LERSSCHEN SERV LEGAL 10- 4218- 220 -22 1 ,304. 110 168834 16/12/85 487.•36 CASCI DECORATORS CONSTRUCTIGN 26 -1300- 000 -00 ^' 33 4E7.06 + 3A 168835 6/12/85 46.39 EDINA REALTY OVERPAYMENT 40- 3525— COC —CO °" 39 46.39 • <� 'r 108856 0,6/12/85 546.25 ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50 J° 39 546.25 * 14' a0 168x.37 U6/12/t`_ 1 +7,167.50 .;OE GREUPNER LESSCNS 27- 4100 - 675 -66 ^ 10,167,59 * — 9c 168334 ;76/12/85 645.00 MORRIS NORMAN 8 ASSO CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 500 -50 64500 * 179 ar 1681'39 s 'D6/12/85 185,747.56 METRO WASTE CONTROL SEWER SLR 40- 4312 - 801 -8C ' 185,747.56 "^ 168840 96/12/85 2,749.00 NORDWEST BUILDERS CONSTRUCTION 10- 1428 - 000 —GO sC 9+ _ 2,749.00 •� 52 168F41 6112/P5 3,605.1;0 VERSATILE VENTCLES MACE 8 EQUIP 27- 1340 — COO -09 73 .A 3,605.—' 0 70 7, 168842 06/12/85 1,00'1.00 MAIN HURCMAN AUDIT 10- 4216- 160 -16 73 sa s� !68842 G6 /12185 607.90 MAIN HUROMAN ALDIT 15- 2450 - 000 -GO 1985 -Y OF E01KA 1 • rw; r_ n2 TF AMMINT v- Nnr) CH=CV SISTER C6 -17- PAGE 29 TTFB nFSrRTP1TnN ArrmiNT Nn. TNY. 5 P.O. FSSAGF - - - - ir-- - - - -.. _ _ _- 1 2 1 168842 2 26/12/85 1 10 ^.0 0 R RAIN HURDMAN A AUDIT 2 23- 4216 - 610 -61 1688420.6/12185 1 100+ - "1 ^ M MAIN HURDMAN A AUDIT 2 26- 4216- 688 -68 _ _ al 108842 - - -1 6/12/85 9 90 ^..`0 M MAIN HURCMAN A AUDIT 2 27- 4.216- 660 -66 ' ' a 1 158842 6 6/12/P5 7 7a ^,. ^C M MAIN HURCF "AN A AU017 2 28- 4216- 7C6 -70 s 1 168842 - L6 /12 /8S 1 10 11.10 M MAIN HURCMAN A AUDIT 2 29 -4216- 720 -72 A AI 168841 0 - L 2 '100-1111 M MA TN HURDMAN A AUDIT 0 0-4 -13-%8 0 - 7 6 9 9 168842 _ _6112/85 6 600+.30 M MAIN HURCMAN A AUDIT 5 50- 4216 - 820 -82 1 10 „ a 1 168842 C C6/12/95 6 6 C 0 C M MAIN HURDMAN A ALDIT 5 50- 4216 - 840 -84 +O.__- . .1 6 8 94 2 - - - - -- !.6/12/85 6 60 ^ I IIN HURCMAN A AUDIT 5 5n -4216- 860- 86- - -- - -__._ 3I " 1 168942 0 06/12/85 6 60C.n0 h h0.IN HURDMAN A AUDIT 6 66- 2490 - 000 -00 " 1 168£43 0 06/12/85 3 32 .G^ C CONNIE SIMONS R REFLNO SUIPPING 1 10 -3500- 000 -00 32.+3 L1 • • 17 1 163244 ! ! :6/12/F5 7 79432.80 P PROWN & C?IS INC P PAYMENT 6 60- 2040- 000 -00 ; ;) ° 79432. 0 + + { T {{ 1985 CITY OF �D7_,'I, rwrrw tup- A.1 Ir r, P u Al I A T CHECK REGISTER wc- idn ro TT7W nrCrcTPTTmd 0E -17 -85 PACE 30 ArrniikT NO- Thlb- A 0-n- h MC'IZCAIM;' 2 1159766*9,7 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISFESSARY FUND 3 3 49,214.73 FUND 6r TOTAL _c_QN_Sl_WUlSN_F U.N 0 7 2079675.90 FUND 66 TOTAL IPP BONE FEOEPFTION #2 1906F9339.25 TOTAL 7 7 17 2•1 27 '.2 -3 74 27 3 3 4� 47 .1 1 37 is 39 40 41 jII 4'1 31 rr 52 53 71 711 t5 7,• y � P y 1985 C. CF EDINA CHECK R,STER 05 -31 -85 -AGE s CHECK-ND: DA MOUN EN00 TEM- DEStRIPTiON ACCOUNT-NO� - it INY.-P:O: p- MESSAGE -- , 106138 06/10/85 76.51- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ; j+ _..__1 ^;6138 "" -O6l10 "185 3025043`— fD- PHILLIPS-"_---- 5f)- 4626- 862- 86-- - ----- -- -- MANUAL 39748.92 • a•ra --- - - - -"- - a•a -CKS i s 120271 06/10/85 60.19- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ;� -- 120271 - - 06/10185- - --- -900--1 50 -4626- 862 -86 - - -- -- -- MANUAL -I 120271 06/10/85 29875.23 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 29824.04 • •9999• aar -CKS ""- 1271267 -- 06110/85— 3x2:44 — CAPrTIt CITY-DISTRI -- 50- 4628 - 822 -82— - -- - MANUAL " �,7I 12112.67 06/10/85 9090 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 121067 06110/85 722.45 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -''127C6T�D6110'185 4 33.-28 — CAIPI- nt- CITV-DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 - -- - --- -- MANUAL - -- 1.,t� 127067 06/10/85 11.25- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 121067 06/10/85 14.40 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 121067- "C6/101E5 435.53��— CAPITAL CITY- DISTRI- 50- 4628 - 862 -86- - -- -- -- MANUAL - i:-3----127067 06/10/85 433.28- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I'! 127067 66/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL j'I� 2706/ 0 6/1"8 -5 11 : 25=— `-- CAPITAL— CITY -DI STRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL — y�, 121067 06/10/85 435.53- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL j2, 127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL yh� `- '127067' 06110/85 435:53 CA PIT AL-Cl TT- DISTRI' - 50- 4628- 862- 86---- -- --- -- --`14ANUAL 127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - ! I„ 127067 06/10/"85 433.28- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I„ 127067 U"6y10Y85 11 -25= t1iPrm--CITY- DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 - -- MANUAL - �:. 127067 06/10/85 11.25 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4 121067 06/10/85 433.28 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ,� - 1271267 -- 06/10/85 435:53 - CAPITAL CITY- DISTRI -- 50 -4628- 862- 86'- ---_..---._. - --- MANUAL - y;< 127067 06/10/85 11.25- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL L 127067 06/10/85 433.28 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - 1270:67- 06710785 1.25 CAP ITAt-CI"Tt -OISTR 1 50-4628-862-86----- ---MANUAL - �; -.i 674.66 - - -. a a a a. ;� ._._ - _____— - - - -- -- - ---- - - -.._ -a • a. C KS -._ I"'i r„ 127129 06/10185 29532.85 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �. -; 127129 - O6r10%8S - 504:50 8E L-8O 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - ---- MANUAL 127129 06/10185 29201.80 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ( 59239.15 a r 7 •aa -CKS' 11 127135 0- 5120 -/85 1-:96 = CAGLE- rN ISCOUN 50- 3710 - 003- 00--- ---MANUAL 127135 06/10/85 9.57- EAELE MINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ° 127135 06/10/85 11.33- EAGLE MINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 127135 -- 06/10/85 .OS-- EAGL"TNE- 50- 3710 - 842- 84--- - - -- - -- MANUAL` 127135 06/10/85 13.22- EAGLE NINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL II, 127135 06/10/85 25.07- EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL rj_127135 Oa710T8Y 25 :t?7 EASL1`MTN 50- 3710 - 862 -8d —MANUAL---- II 127135 06/10/85 25.07 EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 127135 C6/10185 909 EAGLE MINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL S � 1985 CITY CF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE e MOUN _ TEM- D£SCRIPTI-ON CCOUNT -NO-i INV.— M- P:O. - -U MESSAGE-- - -,IF—CHECK �' 127135 06/10/8 .31 EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 I' MANUAL I; I - I____ -' 127135 '-- C6 /101ES- — "5:18��"`�EAIILE`VIN 50 -3710- 862- 86-- - - - ---- MANUAL- - -'7-1 - 127135 06/10/85 418.70 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ^! 121135 06/10/85 4004 -- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - -- 127135 — 06/10-18 660;78 EAGLE`VINt. 50- 4628- 842 -84 - -- -- - -- MANUAL �! 127135 06/10/85 566.49 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL °I 127135 06/10185 19253933 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 127135 -- 66/10/85 ":253.33 EAGLE - NINE - - -- - -50 -4628- 862 -86 - -- — - --- MANUAL -- .,I-- 127135 06/10/85 1500- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i l - 127135 -- 06/10/85 4950- EAGLE VINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 127135 -- 06/10/85 53:33- EAGLE -WIN 50- 4628- 862 -86 —' -- -- MANUAL ., 127135 ,127135 06/10/85 C5/20/E5 258.79 97.80 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 INVENTORY 50- 4632 862 MANUAL , ;, 3:226: 2 0 -: - -86 - - -- --- - - MANUAL - - -- ___- --- - -.I_.� ., IN f f I•' + ++-CKS 127138 06/10/85 10.29- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL -,1 127138 06/10/85 10000- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL _``'- "127138 "- "06/10185- 05 9-9— 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - - --' --- MANUAL -- o' -, 127138 06/10/E5 2.DO- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 127138 06 /10 /E5 23.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -E4 MANUAL - 127135 0671078 7i 66- HIL"LIPS - 50 -3710- 842 -84 -MANUAL ti - =� 127138 06/10/85 13.25- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 127138 06/10/85 4.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 127138 U67107E5 -- 19'19= ED "PHILL ?PS - 50 -3710- 842 -84 - - " - -- MANUAL --'- e•I 127138 06/10/85 18.37- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - I. 127138 06/10/E5 85.26- ED PHILLIPIS 5C- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ;;I t,, — 127138 L'i6 /10 /8 6:-35 ED _PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 - -- MANUAL-----!­I +•• 127138 06/10/95 4.18 -. ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 127,138 06/10/85 97.83- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 1271 38--- C6/10/E5 T .15- ED- PHIL"LIAS 50- 3710 - 862 =86 - -- ' -.•- MANUAL - 127138 U6/10/85 11928- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 127138 u6/10/85 20.56- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ;- 127138 - -Ub "/10785 9.35 - -ED- PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 - - -- -- MANUAL - - -- +' „I 127138 U6/10/85 499.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL - �, 127138 06/10185 49263.16 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL I• -J `127138 - t36i10185 467;50— ET-PHILLIPS- 50- 4626- 862- 86- ' - - - --- ----MANUAL - - 127138 06/10/85 4,891.69 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL - :- 127138 06/10/85 817.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ,! 127138 -- 0671078 514 - :50 ED'-PHILLIP 50- 4628- 822 -82 ^ -_ - FANUAL ' -- + 127138 06/10/85 429.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 127138 C6/10/E5 662.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -64 MANUAL - -- 127138 'U6710IS5 959.25 ED- PHILLIP 50- 4628 - 842 -84 i - -° MANUAL - 127138 06/10/85 382.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -- 127138 U6/10/85 918.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127138 II67107E5 200:n0 E"HILLIP 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127.138 06/10185 1,173o46 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127.138 Q6/10185 100000 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL I'= 1271382 6/10 /85- 564 X00 'ED -PH ILLIm 50- 4628 - 862 -86-- ' "MANUAL” °" 127138 06/10/85 1 9028.15 ED PWILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 17,4 127138 06/10185 209.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862-86 MANUAL 5 1375 � 5TH 50m-4-628= 862 =8d ANUAC- +I.a 1$070.10,+ e 1985 C. OF EDINA CHECK h STER 05 -31 -85 .,GE 3 ! — CHECK -NO: OukTE AMOUNT VENDORi£M- OESCRIPI-i-ON- ACCOUNT- NO.— INY.-A-P.0.-# MESSAGE- -- - -�, -q --- -12'7190 -06/10/85 MANUAL -GRIGGS-"COOPER--AND- 12-.40- �. 127190 06/10/85 63987- GRIGGS COOPER AND MANUAL 121190 U6/10/85 .63.44- GRIGGS COOPER AND ._ 1271 9006 /10-IE 5 619;20 GRIGGS- COOPER-A NO-- — IRITElt0NTINENTAL 12'7190 06/10/85 3,193.72 GRIGGS COOPER AND �r 19 127190 06/10/85 3,172.22 GRIGGS COOPER AND 1,1 - - - - - -- -- -- -- 6;'846.03. -► —�— —_ I+ 1 '��,� ♦f +fff 50- 3710 - 822- 82----- -- - --- - MANUAL---- --'.•� 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 ,MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 -- - - - - -- MANUAL — �v 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL INTERCONTINENTAL i 127271 06/10/65 15.88- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 127271 06/10/85 .70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL — 127271 06/10/85 3:24 = — IRITElt0NTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822- 82-- -- -- - --- MANUAL - - -- „ 127271 06/10/85 5.92- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL L 127271 06/10/85 113.03- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1-12 7 2 71 -- 06/10785 ?5:-68 - I'N TER C0NTTNENTAL -PK 50 -3710- 862 -86 - -- MANUAL -- -� 127211 06/10/85 35.35- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL `I 127271 06/10/85 2.40 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL -� -- 12?2?1---G6/1O/85' - 6.60 — INTERCONTINENTAL -PK- 50 -4626- 822 -82 -- -- MANUAL 127271 06/10/85 794.15 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 127211 06/10/-85 19162.20 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 127271 06/10/85 27.- 30INTERC- ONIINENTAL -PK 0- 4626- 842 -84 - -- MANUAL­_­-__ 127271 06110/85 5,651.67 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 127271 06/10/85 18960 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 _ MANUAL `- 127271 - 06710785 --31784:4-4— INTERCONTINENTAL PK- �`- 50 -4626- 862 -86 - --`-- ----- -MANUAL - n 127271 06/10/85 296.00 INTERCONTINENTAL FK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127271 06/10/85 2010 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL °I fffaff - + + + -CKS 127285 06/10/85 5.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL s 127285 06/10/85 3.34- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL I i� — 127285 06/10 - /85 z 0.49 - JOHNSON -WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 — - MANUAL - 127285 06/10/85 18.29 -, JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 127285 06/10/85 6.94- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ` - 127285106/10/85 —2:64- JO*iNSON --WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86— --PANUAL -- 127285 06110/85 11.41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL �;., 127285 06/10/85 13.85- JOHNSON .WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL — 127285 b6 110"5 9024:9Q JOHNSON-11INE -50- 4626 - 842 -84 ----- - - ---- MANUAL—— L.I 127285 0.6/10/85 4.50 JOHNSON MINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL I 127285 06/10/85 28940.6 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 127285- --- U,6/10/85 -3:00 - +' JOHNSON -WINE 50- 4628- 822- 82- - -- - -- MANUAL - �„ 127285 06/10/85 167.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANLAL i.. 127285 06/10/85 3960 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL -- 127285 II6/10185 914w7l ----- JOHNSON -WINE 50- 4628 +842 -84- ---- MANUAL- -- L,I 127285 06/10/85 17.70 JOHNSON VINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127285 06/10185 347.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �- : =1- - 127285 - - - - -C6 /10185 3:60 40'HNSON-WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 127285 06/10/85 570.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 127285 06/10185 132.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4• -5 27 285—' 0-611018 -. 127285 06/10/185 mo -.4a 8.70 JOHNSON'-WIN JOHNSON WINE -50- 4628 -862 -8 6 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL- MANUAL ,< I 'I -„ 121285 06/10/85 692.97 JOHNSON .WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 71 1905 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-31-85 PAGE 4 6 --- CHECK-IM-9-UXTE AMOUINI VENITOR ilCK--DES-CR7FTT-CN—ACCOUNT-NOo--INV:#-P:O.-It MESSAGE 127285 06/10/85 60 JOHNSON MINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4-9-106 0-218 *-CK S 17 12F433 06/10/85 221.88 PAUSTIS & SONS 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL J121433 u6/10/85 4.25 PAUSTIS & SONS 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL -_ 2260 3--47— CKS 127435 06/10/8! 83- PRIOR WINE CO 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 127435 06M/E5 2*74- PRIOR MINE CO 50-3710-842-64 MANUAL 50-4626-842-84----- - - - --- MANUAL 1�71 127435 06/10/85 137:35 PRIOR MIKE CO 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 174.93 J •**-CKS 127451 —G6 / 10 f 8 5- .11 QUALITY-wrNE MANUAL 127451 06/10/e5 *27 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 127451 C6/10i85 .27- QUALITY MINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 12745T U 67107 9 :54 U AL-r T Y- V I NE 50-3 710-842-8 4------ MANUAL 127451 66M/E5 3*87- QUALITY WINE 50-3710-842-E4 MANUAL 1'7 127451 06/10/85 19099- QUALITY WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL i--- - 5 - 1 7= —.QUALr TY''WT NE' 50-3710-842-84-- MANUAL 127451 96/10/85 23:80- QUALITY WINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 127451 06/10/25 12.09- QUALITY WINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL &-e58----------9UACTTT-79INE— -50-3710-862-86—'--------- M A N U A L 127451 06 /10 /E 099- QUALITY VINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL i 127451 06/10/85 17*99- QUALITY WINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 12 74 51—C- 6/107-2 --; 1'2--QUALT-T-T-WT NE MANUAL 127451 06/10/85 1,258.68 QUALITY WINE 50.4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 127451 06/10/85 1,190.46 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL '1--127451 06170785 6:45- O UALT TY-,WI N !0-4626-862-86--- MANUAL 127451 06110/E5 49*94 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 127451 06/10/85 5.56- QUALITY MINE 50-4628-822-U MANUAL --12745r - - - =6/10 /85 i 3.68w--DUALITY-WTNE- 50-4628-842-84 127451 06/10/85 13995- QUALITY MINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL I- 127451 (16/10/E5 193*80 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628-842-84 IWAN LAL -,I 12 74 5 u 6 10 lf 5 Y-99-66 QUAUTTY-VTNL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 127451 06/10/85 1 3o68 QUALITY MINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 127451 06/10/85 329*46 QUALITY MINE 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL `127451 —U6 /1C 785 8 990' 5; 2--CUl OLI TY-VINE 50-4628-862-86------ MANUAL 17 127451 U6/101E5 604e50 QUALITY MINE 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL 127451 05/20/85 24*50 QUALITY PINE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 94-15 ale, ffff.f ***-CKS 127540 06/10/85 14.44- TWIN CrTY WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 127540 06/10185 5*67- TWIN CITY MINE 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL I -11-127 1-3-o-50 ul N-t-TT7--V IN L 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL —j.: 127540 06110M 722.34 TWIN CITY WINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL ;4 1 l 17 127540 06/10/85 5910 TWIN CITY WINE 50-46 28-862-86 MANUAL 75 ' 6 1985 C OF EDINA CHECK K. _STER 05 -31 -85 .AGE 5 I—CHECK-NO-.OA-TLNOUN Vt NO OR &ITE"ESC-WIP-rltk—ACCOUNT-140i-IRV.�--a P:O. -A MESSAGE- 1127 5 4 06110/85 283971 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - _....- ... -9004w54 --1 ,004 :5 4 - I 3 6 06/10/85 6.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- 134067 -- 06/1078 38:65 ` — - CAPITAL -CITY DISTRi Ie 134055 05/20/85 35.00 BRAEMAII GOLF PETTY CAST. 27- 3410 - 000 -00 ig 134055 (15/20/85 417.89 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 663 -66 .-- ---134055 05/20985 552.50 - -- BRAEMAR- 60LF- - -• - -- PETTY-CAS 27- 4120- 664 -66 - -- -- FIT TAL- CITY- 134055 05/20/85 26.74 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4290 - 660 -66 718.20 134055 C5/20/85 95.10 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASF 27- 4292 - 663 -66 05/20/85 13405 5 05/20185 13:40-- BRAAEMAR -GOLF PETTY -CAS -27- 4514 - 660 -66 yl,a 134055 05/20/85 53960 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASK 27- 4540 - 661 -66 . -. - - - 134055 05/20/85 42.41 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4620 - 663 -66 -i -i -- 134055 - 051207E 5 71:E6— BR -AExAK OLF- - PETTY -CA-S -27- 4624- 664- bdV-' ------ 19308.50 + �117 r -c 1 40 7 * ** -CKS I' MANUAL MANUAL c - MANUAL - - -r_ MANUAL MANUAL I. MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL - *so-CKS - -- w I l Q l * ** * ** 3 6 06/10/85 6.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- 134067 -- 06/1078 38:65 ` — - CAPITAL -CITY DISTRi 50 -4628- 822 -82 - -" - MANUAL --134129-- C6 /10 /E5— 134U67 06/10/85 215.46 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -- 06/10/85 134067 06/10/85 2.70 CAPITAL CITY OISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ` -s- 13 40 6 7 -- 06 710/8 5 MANUAL FIT TAL- CITY- 01STRT 50- 4628- 862 -86 -- - MANUAL i 134067 06/10/85 718.20 CAPITAL CITY OISTRI 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1r3T3.35 134U67 05/20/85 36.00 CAPITAL CITY INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL ,i` - - -- 134135- 5.26 -76�' -- -242:03 £- AGLE'1iINE— -- -- -- . -. - - - w I l Q l * ** * ** e + **-CKS MANUAL MANLAL 134135 06/10/85 .11 EAGLE WIN_ ' i 134129 06/10•/85 19312.15 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 134129 (16/10/85 59558 *70 BELLBOY 50 -4626- 822 -82 50 -3710- 862 -86 --134129-- C6 /10 /E5— -- 25.620 FFLLBOY 5C- 4626- 842 -84 yl; 134129 06/10/85 19852 *68 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 -- 06/10/85 134129 06/10/85 29403 *40 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 134135 - 134129 076110/8 661 * -05 - - BELL-810 0- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 134135 11 9762.36 + EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 *** -CKS 1341 -35 06/10/85 5.- 590 A-GL"IN 50- 4628- 842 -84 yI 134135 06/10/85 1r3T3.35 EAGLE WINE e + **-CKS MANUAL MANLAL 134135 06/10/85 .11 EAGLE WIN_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 `- 134135 06 -1101-85 6:963 EAGLE' -WIN --50- 3710 - 842 -84 134135 06/10/85 4.84- EAGLE MINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 ` 134135 66/10/8: 27.47 EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - 134135 ' - -- 06/10/85 27:47- EAGLE - VINE"' -'"- --- ---50- 3710 - 862 -86 �,- 134135 C6/10/E5 27.47- EAGLE WISE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 134135 06/10/85 848.08 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 *** -CKS 1341 -35 06/10/85 5.- 590 A-GL"IN 50- 4628- 842 -84 yI 134135 06/10/85 1r3T3.35 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 134135 06/10/85 19373.35 - EAGLE NINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 134135- 06/10Y'85 -- -242:03 £- AGLE'1iINE— 50- 46 28- 862 -86 134135 06/10185 19373.35 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 29408.79 * e + **-CKS MANUAL MANLAL MANUAL -- MANUAL C MANUAL — MANUAL - I - - -- - *•• -CKS - MANUAL - -- MANUAL -- i MANUAL t MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL `, MANUAL MANUAL - - MANUAL j Ia MANUAL -- - MANUAL - - MANUAL *** -CKS 16 s' 341 -38" CGi1ff/"FS— 6'.''38 T'D'PHiCC2PS 50- 3710- 822 +82 ° - -'-- MANUAL- - - %;? 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE F—CHECK-XU.--lTATL 3� A IlRau N I VENDF04 TER- QESTRIPTION --ACCOUNT- NO:- INV•- A- P:O: -'A M 134138 06/10/85 2008- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 !- 134138 106710785 - - - " -;90 EO- PHILLIPS' 50 -3710= 822 -82- "-- -_-... ,. 134138 1..6/10/85 11.57- ED PHILLI °S 50- 3710 - 822 -82 �7 134138 06'/10/E5 17.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 — 134138 06710 -185 37:99— ED- PHILLIPS - - -- —50- 3710 - 842- 84 -- - --- e.Ie 134138 06/10/85 4.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 �•, 134138 06/10/85 .62 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 i, 134138' 06/10/8`. 20:28 -- -ED- PHILLIPS " -- - -- -50- 3710 - 842- 84"-- - ----- -- •i„ 134138 06/10/185 33.11- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 154138 06/1D/85 21.53- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 --- 134138 U6 /10185 :80- ED- PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- •,_� 134138 106/10/85 23.57- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 134138 06/10185 33.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 IlkI,_� ' 134138- "U6 /10185 45.03- -EO- PHILLIPS _50- 3710- 862 -86 +- -- - ..',-1 134138 06/10/85 1,899.48 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 ,r 134138 06/10/85 29251.45 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 862 -86 =,_- -1341 3i� —C�>10 t£5 578:70 --- ED-"PHICLIPS -50- 4628 - 822 -82 - 9.!, -I 134138 06/10/85 45.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 J12, 134138 66/10/85 219.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 2- - "134138 C6 -7 1C/85 --- 1j0(!8- .99 —ED- PHILLIPS'- 50- 4628- 822- 82— _-`-. -- - •! -, 134138 06/10/85 674.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 `I- 154138 u6/10/85 19655950 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 ^-134138 U- 6710185 31.00 ED- PiiICLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - -- �' -, 154138 061lC/E5 200.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -E4 134138 06/10/85 19014.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 -- 134138- -- 06710785 -- —1- 178.29' ED-PR2LLIPS - 50 =4628- 862 -86 -- - - - - -- �.- 154138 06/10/85 19673.34 ED PHILLIPS 512- 4628- 862 -86 134138 C61lO/F! 19076.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 J, h; -134 13 - 40: -00ED- PHILLIPS -- 50- 4628 - 862 =86 - „� 134138 05/20/85 204.75 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 139526.33 * __ _i '; 134190-- QS/IT"5 GRIGGS- COOPER -AND -C 50= 3710 = 822 -82 ---- 76— .�.; 134190 06/10/85 7089- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 I -- 134190 U6/10/65 33.01- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 -, 134190 106/10/85" P5:74.- GRIGGS'- COOPER"ANO- -5'1- 3710 - 862- 86- - - -' -�-- �'•, 134190 u6/10185 80.17- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 134190 06/10/85 88000- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 - 34190 "— II6T1078 394:4+4 GRIGGS- COOPER-AND-C 50 -4626- 822 -82 ^ A 134190 U6/10/85 11650.34 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 842 -84 ,- 134190 06/10/85 49008.45 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 1341 90- u67107 4-9286:87 286.'87- COOPER AND C -- 50= 4626- 862- 86-- -- - -�" •�m; 109047.09 I3� 134271 06/10/:85 10.91- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -0000 - 862 -86 13 42 71 X6710785 45:65 INTEICONTINENTAL -PK 50-0000-862-86-------- 134271 06/10/85 4.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -0000- 862 -86 ;.: 134271 06/10/85 5.43- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 822 -82 3R 134271 4 "671018 ..O = - -I NTER-CDNTINENTAL -PK-• "• 50- 3710 - 842 -84 134271 06/10185 .44 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 -T 134271 06/10/85 33.95- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 862 -06 s ESS AGE " MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL • • MANUAL I I' - MANUAL MANUAL • • MANUAL - PANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL` -" WANUAL MANUAL • - MANUAL -- - MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL it •i #- CKS - -- MANUAL Ili MANUAL -" MANUAL PANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL �74 MANUAL 1985 L OF EDINA CHECK �, _STER 05 -31 -85 AGE 7 I� I._ tHrECK -N0: OA-TE- AMOUNI VENDOR, - - --- ZTEFrDESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO:- INtl.- p"P.0 * -N MESSAGE 9 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ,MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * * * -CK .I, I�f F. S ,. MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL -" MANUAL e MANUAL -- MANUAL -- MANUAL MANUAL - - MANUAL- MANUAL 1 A MANUAL --- MANUAL - --' MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL e - -- ***- CKS --.: 'e MANUAL - MANUAL - - MANUAL MANUAL �• MANUAL ! MANUAL -- MANUAL - I. I f - -- * * * -CKS - MANUAL 134271 06/10/85 3 *30 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 - -134271- -06/1Q/85 1�2TD.30�7NTETCONTMENTAL- -PK- -50- 4626 - 842 -84 ---- "- ------ MANUAL 134271 06/10/85 22 *05- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 134271 06/10/85 19697.80 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 134271" 06"/10-/85 -9.60 INTERCONTINENTAL -PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 - - - -- 1�I 134271 06/10185 271.85 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 " 134271 06/10/85 2.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 822 -82 I,- i0 8 40 *�' -- - - - - -- Y, 1 1 134285 06/10/85 3.30- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 v „I 134285 06/10185 5.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - 134285 06/1Q/85 - -13.48= JOHNSON-UINE - 50-3710-862-86---- 134285 06/10/85 9.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 �I 134285 06/10/85 9.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- 134185 G6/10l8 3400 dONNSON -MINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 1.,,1 134285 06110/85 674.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 y, I 134285 06/10185 4.80 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 L;., - 134285 0"6 /10185 260 w6 3-- -'-- JOHNSON -WINE- 50 -4628- 822 -82 - 134285 06/10/85 2.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 ,,, 134285 06/10/85 165.12 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 134285 C6 -1mit 5 50 -4628- 862 -86 L.! 134285 06/10/85 9.30 JOHNSON MINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 y1.7 71 134285 06/10/85 464.35 JOHNSON .WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 0.6flD/85— -"-- 494.08 JORN"14- WINE- -”` -- - 50 -4628- 862 -86 -- - - -� 2,041.78 • r y1-1 134435 05/20/85 .33 -, PRIOR WINE INVENTORY 50- 3710- 003 -OC - - "134435" 06 /10 7 85— '05 PRIOR-WINS -CO "- 50- 3710 - 862- 86 - - - - -- 134435 06/10/85 .35 FRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 862 -86 �,•. 134435 06/10/e5 .35- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 862 -86 134 43 5 06/10 "/85 74-9 - PRIOR- WINE -CO- - 50- 4628 - 862 -86- - -- 06/10/85 17.49 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 862 -86 y`-134435 �. 134435 06/10/85 17949- "PRIOR TWINE CO 50 -4628- 862 -86 :- 134 4 3'5--- u 512 0 /15 16 .49' PRIOR- qI -rr- I RVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862- 86- -- --- --- 33.30 + 134451 06110/85 16.54- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 1,- 134451 --06/10/85 13:92✓ QUALITY "WINE- ­--- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - - -- 134451 06/10/85 10.61- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 y',- 134451 06/10/85 6.11 - QUALITn WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 -,7-134451 06-110715 :4-T—GUAUTY -WIN 50 -3710- 822 -82 I- 134451 06/10/85 17.55- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 w 134451 06/10/85 11.25- QUALITY WANE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 134451 -'- 06/10/85- 44.70= - 9UALIT77WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -8b' _ 134451 '76/10/85 827.42 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 134451 06/10/85 42306 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 Isn— "134451 U "10785 8T1;9d QUALITY -WITH 50 -4626- 842 -84 - -,� 134451 06/10/85 2,235.15 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 134451 C6/10185 696 *2T QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 9 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL ,MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * * * -CK .I, I�f F. S ,. MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL -" MANUAL e MANUAL -- MANUAL -- MANUAL MANUAL - - MANUAL- MANUAL 1 A MANUAL --- MANUAL - --' MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL e - -- ***- CKS --.: 'e MANUAL - MANUAL - - MANUAL MANUAL �• MANUAL ! MANUAL -- MANUAL - I. I f - -- * * * -CKS - MANUAL - MANUAL ' MANUAL I Q MANUAL - MANUAL - -- MANUAL i. MANUAL MANUAL--'--- - MANUAL I.I� MANUAL -- MANUAL - -_ 1 MANUAL IQ MANUAL "1 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE I r,l J I B f i f f f# i i• ff# - CKS �.•.,�137C15 05/20/85 28.23 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 500 -50 _ - MANUAL • 137015 05/20/85 13.37 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL j..i 13TC15 05720785 9:R9 AT'6 I TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62- -,------ - MANUAL - ,� 137015 05/20/E5 10.70 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 661 -66 MANUAL • 137C15 05/20/85 9000 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL _ , I 137015 - -U5 -/20/8 14:64--- AT`B "T` `- - - '-TELEPHONE -50- 4256 - 841- 84­- - - -- -- - MANUAL > 85.03 a i H I • frf *f# f -CKS -- „ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL -', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL �z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- , •�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_ I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I ---CHECK-WO. -uA I L A AROUN V VENDOR I ITEN DESCRIFTTCK -- A ACCOUNT -N0: IliVo---W- P.O.- R'MESSAGE - - - - -- I1; 1 134451 0 06110/85 3 305.65 Q QUALITY WINE 5 50 -4628- 822 -82 M MANUAL T T411 1 134451 - - -- -06/10185 - - 530:70" Q QUALI -TT- VINE - -- - - -50- 4628- 822- 82 - - -- - - ---- - MANUAL- ' -`- - -134451 0 06/10/E5 5 562.55 Q QUALITY PINE 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL l la 134451 0 05/20/85 2 28.50 Q QUALITY VINE I INVENTORY 5 50- 4630- 822 -82 M MANUAL ] ]' i� - -- X34451 f,5- 120It5 � �57 ;OQ---- Q QUAttTY -Wr-NE I INVENTOR i i0- 4.630- 862 -86 - - - -- -MANUAL- I •I� 6 69415.91 I� i 134540 0 06/10185 4 4.58- T TWIN CITY WINE 5 50- 3710- 822 -82 M MANUAL I I; "L_- 1 134540 D D6Y10/'85 - - 4.80 = TWIN -CTTY -WINE- 5 50- 3710 - 86'2- 86- - - - - - -- -- -MANUAL ` - -J 134540 U U6/10/85 2 229.11 T TWIN CITY WINE 5 50 -4628- 822 -82 M MANUAL _ - 134540 0 06/10/85 3 3.60 T TWIN CITY 41INE 5 50 -4628- 822 -82 M MANUAL L L� C6/10n L 40.15 T TWIN - 50- 4628- 862- 86�---- ` L _ 1 134540 0 06/10/8 4 4.50 T TWIN CITY WINE 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL 467.98 # - - - - - -.I a aaa -CKS 1 135354- u u 5 120 IT . 3 319.03 M MINNEGA"SCO 1 10=11 30= 000 -CC- -' - -- -- MANUAL - - - -- 135354 0 05/20/85 4 474.15 M MTNNEGASCO 4 4+EATING 1 10- 4254- 446 -44 M MANUAL 05/20/85 7 767.56 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 1 10- 4254- 500 -50 M MANUAL 135354- '057201F5 - - 529.30 - - miNNEGA-SCO - - HEATING 1 10- 4254 - 520 -52 - - - - -- --- MANUAL - -- 1 05/20/85 5 59373.13 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 1 10- 6254 - 540 -54 M MANUAL 135354 0 05/20/85 3 31947 M MTNNEGASCO H HEATING 1 10- 4254- 629 -62 M MANUAL 1 135 354 0 05/20185 -- 8 841.16 M MI NNEGASCO°-` - --HEATING 1 10- 4254- 646- 64--_._____. _ __.- MANUAL 135354 0 05/20/E5 1 131.55 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 2 23- 4254- 611 -61 M MANUAL 135354 0 05/20/85 8 81989 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 2 27- 4254 - 662 -66 M MANUAL � �. !;I 1 135354 0 05720-/8 3 38009:20 M MINNEGASCO- - - HEATING 2 28 -4254- 708 -70 -- - - -- MANUAL , 1 135354 0 05/20/85 1 117.47 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 4 40- 4254 - 801 -80 M MANUAL • • -, - 135354 0 05/20/E5 1 1361.14 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 4 40- 4254- 803 -80 P PARUAL 135354 0 05120/85 - --74 ;64 - - MINNEGASCO- H HEATING'----50-4254-821-E2 - - MANUAL - �'•, 1 135354 0 05/20/85 5 51.76 N NTNNEGASCO H HEATING 5 50- 4254- 841 -84 M MANUAL • • 135354 0 05/20/85 1 102.54 M MINNEGASCO H HEATING 5 50 -4254- 861 -86 M MANUAL 13-927 . 99 - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - CKS �.•.,�137C15 05/20/85 28.23 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 500 -50 _ - MANUAL • 137015 05/20/85 13.37 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL j..i 13TC15 05720785 9:R9 AT'6 I TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62- -,------ - MANUAL - ,� 137015 05/20/E5 10.70 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 661 -66 MANUAL • 137C15 05/20/85 9000 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL _ , I 137015 - -U5 -/20/8 14:64--- AT`B "T` `- - - '-TELEPHONE -50- 4256 - 841- 84­- - - -- -- - MANUAL > 85.03 a i H I • frf *f# f -CKS -- „ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL -', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL �z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- , •�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_ I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I „ - 137095 05/20/85 109.11 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ;:• - 137095 -- 05120/85` - 95.61 COMM -OF- REVENUE- STATE -SALES -TAX- 23- 3357- 000 -00- `-'.'- MANUAL -', 137095 C5/20/E5 42936 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL �z 137095 05/20/65 59721.02 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 137095 - 05/2078 5 69 C0M"F- REVENUE - STATE -SALES -TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL -- , •�•.I 137095 05/20/85 28.63 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 29- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL ( >� •_ I•,; 137095 05/20/f5 805.68 COMM OF REVENI'E STATE SALES TAX 40- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1 "_I v 1985 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 9 i 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 10 �Iz� - CHECK -19 MDU £NO 'OR— TEM- DES-CRIPTION - ACCDVNT- NO: -INYiF `0 -P.Oj A" MESSAGE - -- • ++-CKS I. �< _7- 1411915 06104785 -- `59397:13 ` GROUP- IiEAC7H- LMP- HKIISF -G 10- 4504 - 100 -10 MANUAL - 16.00 + 5,397.13 i. :arr +a aaa -CKS 148055 -- 03104185 - 255:78 — BRAEMAR -GOLF- -PETTY_CASH - - -Z7- 4120 - 663 -66 -- - -rare -- 300. ?0 - -- r•r -CKS.. 27- 4120- 664 -66 PANUAL J 141430 0.6/04/85 189917.42 STATE TREASURER ENP CONT FERA 10 -4145- 510 -51 MANUAL �.I. 30:00 - -- - - 1 Bs917�b7� PETTY -CASK —27 -4200- 660 -EE - - - -- - -- - - - `I `,j aarrar -- MANUAL I„ r*r –CKS I,, 1 141442 06/04185 ✓�, 129542.67 PHP EMP HOSP FHP 10- 4156 - 510 -51 -- -- -- . —._. MANUAL , I --- - - - - -- 12954207 a r+r -CKS 14812 29862:85' :7 arrrra 50- 4626- 822 -82 ----------- - �• -I ----- - - - - -- + ++ -CKS -_ • I'r :� -1 -41 ruu 05704185 29000:10-- `FOSTAAI5 TER POSTAGE- y0- 4240= ST0 =51 ------- PANUAL - - -�^• BELLBOY 29000.00 MANUAL F_ ._ -- .148129- Ob710711, 3.197.40- 'BELLBOY -`-'_ -- -�iwiw 7I 139987.90 + w lie, aar –CKS -- _ —1z, 144404 06/C4185 29616.40 NORTH A'MERIICAN EMP LIFE INS 10- 4157 - 510 -51 MANUAL 613. 148135 06/10185 4.89- - - - -�;' !27 arrrar • ++-CKS -� 144772 06/04/85 16.00 MET MUNICIPALITIES RESERYATICN 10- 4504 - 100 -10 MANUAL - 16.00 + i. :arr +a aaa -CKS 148055 -- 03104185 - 255:78 — BRAEMAR -GOLF- -PETTY_CASH - - -Z7- 4120 - 663 -66 -- -` "" MANUAL 148055 06/04/85 300. ?0 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CAS1+ 27- 4120- 664 -66 PANUAL ;,,L148055 06/04/85 120.00 BRAEMAR' ]GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 666 -66 MANUAL 1480.55 -- 067047 30:00 BRAEMA"OLF - PETTY -CASK —27 -4200- 660 -EE -- MANUAL ,148055 06/04/85 38.43 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4620- 661 -66 MANUAL I„ 744.21 + r+r -CKS 14812 29862:85' - BELLBOY —'- 50- 4626- 822 -82 ----------- - MANUAL-- - �• -I 148129 06/10/85 29694.95 BELL30Y 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ns! 148129 06/10/85 59232.70 BELLBOY 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL F_ ._ -- .148129- Ob710711, 3.197.40- 'BELLBOY -`-'_ 7I 139987.90 + lie, sr +ra a + +++CKS ' 148135 06/10185 4.89- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL -- 148135- D671Q78S- 244:65 -EA- GEE -VIN 50- 4628 - 842=84--- ------- MANUAL - ?•Isri 239.76 + �rrr ■r* -CKS —• ~Ise 148138 Ub/10 /85 38.32 -" ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ,;;.� 1985 C, . OF EDINA CHECK K_ .STER G5 -31 -85 . -AGE 11 .. , - CHECK-11 "-G "XT 148138 06/10/85 AMOUNT 6.56- ENDO TEM-DES-CRIPYION ED PHILLIPS ACCOUNT -N0. INU: 50- 3710- 822 -82 #-P.O.-- -#-- MESSAGE-- ---- MANUAL - -,, !- n -'- 1481 ]8-- `U6 /10 /i'S -- `9.98 ED'- PHILLIPS` - -- 50- 3710 - 822- 82----- - - -- -- MANUAL ry 148138 06/10/85 6.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 148138 L•.6/10/E5 29.19- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 ,MANUAL 461-38 U 6-f10-t8 5 04.08 ---ED- PHILLIPS 0- 3710 - -842 -84 - MANUAL --- -I 148138 06/10/585 11.99- ED'PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL "I 14813E C6/10/•E5 9.24- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL f,? - - - -- 148138- -- 06/10185- ---- 13.10---- ED-PHILLIPS -50- 3710 - 862 -86- _- _. - - -- -_MANUAL- 148138 U6/10/E5 50.01- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL .. z 148138 U6/10/85 5.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL „� 148138 06/10/89 1 - 016.22 FtJ- PHILLIP -50- 4626 - 822 -82 ----- MANUAL - -- 148138 06/10/85 59204.12 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �,i „ 148138 -- 148138 --" 06/10/85 C'6-/1O/T5 2,500.70 325:n0E0- ED PHILLIPS 'PHILLIPS - 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL -- ' 148138 06/10/85 499.20 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 PANUAL yl„ 148138 U6/10/85 328 U ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL _._1481 38 06110185 61:60 - EO- PHILLIP 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - -- MANUAL--- - 14813E 06/10185 19459.45 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -E4 MANUAL 148138 06/10/E5 59905 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �+ 38 -'` 06/10/85 292.00 " - -EO- PHILLIPS _50- 4628- 862 -86 - - --- °- MANUAL " 10•,.1481 06/10/85 654.95 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL �,. ar148138 139955.98 + 999999 rrr —CKS �I- z �- 148190--- D6 /10YE5 `28:40= -- GRIGGS""COOPER- AND C--- 50 -3710- 822- 82 - - - - -- - - MANUAL 148190 06/10/85 87.57- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -E4 MANUAL - �, 148190 C6/10/E5 55.56- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ­1481 90 X6/10/85 j419�0-90,GRIGG -S- COOPER -AND- 50- 4626- 822- 82-- --- --- --- "- MANUAL - 148190 148190 06/10/85 06/10/85 49378950 29779.06 GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 842 -84 50 -4626- 862 -E6 MANUAL MANUAL' r +r +rr ***—CKS 148271 06/10/85 7.50- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 148271 06/10/85 7087- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - - --`148271- 06/10/85 , -9C.83- INTERCONTINENTAL-PK- 50 -3710- 842- E4- - - - - -- - - MANUAL, ..I. 148271 06/10/E5 1.55- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 148271 06/10/85 8.17- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL i -,7 7 148271 - 06/10/15 1 :50- -- ilTERCONTINEN-TA� PK "50- 4626- 822 -82 - --- - MANUAL - �., � 148271 06/10/15 375.01 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 148271 06/10/85 4,541.57 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL - "148271 - -'- 06/10/85 2400- TNTEICONTINENTAL'PK-- 50- 4626- 842- 84---- -- - --­- -- -- MANUAL „ 148271 06/10/85 408.60 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148271 06/10/E5 1.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 148211- 06/10/85 -400 — INTERCONTINENTAL -PK— 50- 4628- 842 -84 -------- MANUAL - -' 148271 06/10185 393.75 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 148271 06/10/85 77.95 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 146271-- -06 /f4 /E5 '73.75 INTER'PKG - INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 - ---- -- - -MANUAL -' 148271 06/04/85 147.49 INTER AKG INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL X14 59934.30 + .f g,. srrrrr +a+ -CKS - - 148285 "` -`Q 6710ff5" VORNS-ON-HIITL 50= 3- 710=842 -84 1 -- - -" MANUAL -° is 1985 CITY OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 12 MANUAL I; - -._ --- MANUAL — MANUAL • MANUAL of MANUAL - MANUAL • MANUAL -- MANUAL- .._ —'- --- rr.- CKS --._' MANUAL " — — MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL a MANUAL - MANUAL _" • MANUAL +*+ -CKS MANUAL F-CHECK-NO;-UA-TENOUNT— MANUAL LIEN uE5CRIFTT0N`------ACCOIUNl -NO: IKV: -".O. ,148285 MANUAL 06/10185 5.93- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 -: — 148285--- Ob /10 /8 -2.05- JOHNSON -WINE 50-3710-w862-86-- 148285 06%10,/85 3.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 148285 (16/10/85 700.90 JOMNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 7-j--- 149285 06710/E5 3. O"TNE -- 50- 4628- 842 -84 --- _ie� 148285 06/10/85 296.79 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 I, 148285 06/10/85 .60 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 7 148285 - -- X6/10 /85 -- 102.90jOmNSO� NIIVE`—" - --- -- -50 -4628- 862- 86 - - -- - ,� - --" MANUAL 1 9086.10 + MANUAL MANUAL - -- MANUAL -.I e 148435 06/10/•85 2.15- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - 148435 C6/10785 — - 3.77- PRIOR - VINE- CO- _ - - - "'— 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - -" 148435 06/10/85 .43- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 862 -86 148435 06/04/85 17023 PRIOR WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 822 -82 - - 148435 0-6/1078 07.40- PRIOR- WINE -CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 148435 06/10/85 168.50 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 842 -84 148435 06/10/85 21.30 PRIOR LINE CO 50 -4628- 862 -86 j 148451 (16/10/65 4.89- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 148451 06/10/85 8.28- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 14845T 06/10/85` —' "" ;73- QUALITY -WINE - - 50- 3710 - 822- 82 - - -` 148451 06 /10M .05 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 J�_,I 148451 Q6/10 /85 .05 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 3,7-114 , — 14845'1 - 8 4 5 0-7 8- X671078" 27:82- 9UALITT WT NE - -50 -3710- 822 -82 - 148451 06/10/85 28.27- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 148451 06/10/85 76.65- QUALITY MINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 j -_- 148451 (16/10/85 - - -" .11 QUALITY - WINE-- ' - - - "— 50 -3710- 842 -84 -- - -- 148451 06/10/85 1.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 148451 06/10185 5.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 -r- 148451 ZT6 -710%`8 ) :10- OUALITa -WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - ' 148451 06/10/15 5.7'8- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 148451 06/10/85 11.51- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 - --148451--- `- C6/10/85 - 13.21= 0 UAL ITT °WINE-- ' - - - -- ---50- 3710- 862- 86 - - --- - 148451 06/10/85 36.72 QUALITY -WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 148451 06/10/85 1 9391.03 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 - 148451 06710785 5:67- QUALITY -WINE` 50- 4626- 842- 84 - - - -- �•.I 148451 06/10/85 58.74 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 148451 06/10/85 39832.57 QUALITY LINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 148451- 06/10.785 - 660 �84 -QUALITY -WINE—­ 50- 4626- 862 -86 - -- - -- -- `j'j_.---148451 06/10/85 2.99- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 148451 C6/10/85 414.35 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 •= 148451- 06-/1078 5 2.57 — -- iiUALIT". IN 50 -4628- 822 -82 — 148451 06/10/85 244.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 148.451 06/10/85 19413.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 -- 148451 X6/10./85 355.15— — QUALITY- ,4INE' - -- — 50- 4628- 842 -84" - 148451 06/10/85 274.80 QUALITY •MINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 148451 -14 "8431— 06/10/85 578.91 QUALITY 4INE 50- 4628- 862 -86 Gb7107F 89- ;2S- QUAL'ITY -WIN 50 +4628 = 862 -86 149451 06/04/85 25.85 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 99374.28 • MANUAL I; - -._ --- MANUAL — MANUAL • MANUAL of MANUAL - MANUAL • MANUAL -- MANUAL- .._ —'- --- rr.- CKS --._' MANUAL " — — MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL a MANUAL - MANUAL _" • MANUAL +*+ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL - -- MANUAL - -: MANUAL MANUAL - -" MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL — " - -- MANUAL - -" MANUAL MANUAL - - - - - - -- MANUAL" -- MANUAL MANUAL - - -� MANUAL " -- MANUAL G MANUAL - ..- MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL r -- — MANUAL - MANUAL ? MANUAL C I - --" MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL - -- MANUAL -.I e l�n 1985 L_ OF EDINA CHECK n _STER 05 -31 -8S AGE 13 far —CKS . 149067 VENOUK TEM-OESCRIPT20N— ACCOUNT-NO:-INV.-#-P.O:-'A- MESSAGE- - - - --- CHEC"O. OAT AMOUN I ICI 149067 06%10/85 1.80 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- 149067- 06110185- -I,I CAPITAL`CITr- DISTRI 14854U 06110/85 1.30- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL �,I DISTRI 148540 u6 /10/85 :9B TWIN - CITY -�IiNE 0- 4628 - 842 -84 - -- MANUAL ----j .I DISTRI 148540 06/10/85 65.34 TWIN CITY MINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �I� -504628- 862 -86 - -- -- MANUAL - 64.94 1 9201 .12 • - f.aarf fff -CKS ' ;- 148581 96/10/85 � —__. — VINIT -ALIA -- 50- 4628 - 822 -82 - - - - -- -MANUAL --I 70:1-0 --- ----- -- rr>.CKS 148581 0.6/10/85 1912000 VINITALIA 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL !I ` 149129 148581 06/10/85 33.00 VINITALIA 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _L ,�l �- 149129 0./10185 7g067-.�708ELL4-OY- 1323:10 - -- - -- -.. - -- l�n siasaa far —CKS . 149067 06'/10/85 73900 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 149067 06%10/85 1.80 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- 149067- 06110185- -`- 979.88° CAPITAL`CITr- DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - - -- - -- MANUAL -' 149067 06/10/85 13.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -, 149067 C6 /10 /F`. 2.70 CAFITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL -149067-----0 61107" 130 247 -- CAP2'TA- -Ci'T"ISTR -504628- 862 -86 - -- -- MANUAL - 5I 4�1 1 9201 .12 • ,__:..__._iaaaaa- � —__. � _ -- --- --- - -•- -- --- ----- -- rr>.CKS ` 149129 06/10/85 29917.50 EELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANLAL �- 149129 0./10185 7g067-.�708ELL4-OY- 50- 4626- 862 -86- - - - -- MANUAL - 99985.20 II CKS - ' 149135 06/10/85 2921- EAGLE MINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 49135 1 6:97 -- EAGLE -WIA° 50- 3710- 842 -84 - - - - -- MANUAL -' 1 ^� 149135 06/10/85 18.26- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 149135 06/10/85 110041 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -. -- 149135-- - 06/101F5 '848.27- EAGLE -VINE- 50- 4628- 842- 84- - - -- -- MANUAL` 149135 06/10/85 913.07 EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 19834.31 a I..I ufafa aaa -CKS _'- 14v138 -- '- O6 /10 /'t5 - 69�70�-- EO'PIfiILLihS -' `- - 50 -3710- 822- 82---- ---------- - MANUAL - �„ 14V139 U6/10/85 6.14- ED P,HILLIPIS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 149138 06/10/85 9.18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANLAL X149138 - 06110985 3:18+- EO-PHICLIP ',0- 3710 - 822 -82 ---- -MANUAL -- I.! 149138 06/10/.85 2.82 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 149138 06/10/85 21.36- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - -- 149138 - 0/10/85 6 6.48 - EO- PHILLIPS -50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - MANUAL 149138 06/10/85 13.09- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 149138 06/10/85 9.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL „T- 1491'38- -06/10!85 VNIt - EO- PRILtI S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL- i, •++ 149138 06/10/85 12.49- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL i�,1 - 149138 _ 06/10/85 13.34 - ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 �, MANUAL I- ! -- -- -- 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER C5 -31 -85 PAGE 14 v I fIT^- CHECK- NOTATE- Z AMOUNT— D-O ITEM- DES-CRIPTIVNI ACCOUNT- NO.NY: A- P:O.'-A "MESSAGE- - - -- ,1 149138 06/10/85 10.75• ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL -. 149138"---06110/E5- 3 -9484:95- E0 "- PRILLI ?S "- - 50- 4626= 822 -82 - " - -- - MANUAL - - -- - . , 149138 0.6/10/85 475.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 0 149138 06/10/85 654.•65 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 'MANLAL 7j 49138 06/10/!5 3gE54:20 - - -EO-- PHILLIPS -`- 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL- n 149138 149138 06/10/85 Q6/10/85 189.10 4590D ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 MANUAL j • 14V138- `06/10/85 -30600-- EO-PHILL-IPS - -82 -50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - -- MANUAL-- " - " -'; i 149138 06/10185 190679B0 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 PANUAL _ 149138 06/10/85 141.00- ED PHILLIPS 5C- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �•,- 149138- 96%10/85 32400 ED-PHILLIP 50- 4628- 842 -84 -- --MANUAL 149138 06/10/85 667.15 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 149138 06110/85 624.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i.,. 149138 -- 06/10/85 - -- 537.25 - ED- PHILLIPS - 50- 4628 - 862- 86- •- -- `- --- - - ---- --MANUAL " - '- - 12 9253.43 j 149190 06/10/85 19.31- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ' 1491 90' 06/10 /85- " -61 .19= GRIGGS - COOPER AND-C- 50- 3710- 842- 84-- ---- - - -- - -- MANUAL - - 149190 06/10/85 153.62- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 149190 06/10/85 965.30 CRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL — 14919? 06/10785 -� 149190 06/10/85 3 059:25 7,680.82 BRIGGS- COOPER -AND "C GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 50 VANUAL -" - -' 119471.25 # -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL - 149271 Cb7107E5— - 4:52 = iNTERCONTINENTAI PK- 50 -3710- 822 -82 l -- " - PANUAL 149271 ~! 06/10/85 4.52- TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL • I 149271 " -- 06/10/85 4.52 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 149271 06/10/85 57.54- INTERCONTINENTAL -PK`- 50 -3710- 822 -82" - -- ` -' MANUAL vn 149271 06/10185 60.25- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ;• �- 149271 06/10185 15.99- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANLAL 149271 06710 -/85 120 .21- INTERCONTINENTAL-PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 - -- - MANUAL - ��� 149271 06/10185 2.03- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL "I 149271 a 06110/85 26.13- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 149271 "06/10/85 -1.50- TNTERCONTINENTAL-PK- —50- 4626- 822 -82 o�, 149271 06/10/85 225965- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL a ,2149271 06/10/85 1.50- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 822 -E2 MANUAL 14927 07Z' 5 z25-065-------IRTERCONTTNENTAL-PK 50- 4626- 822 -82- '- -- - -- MANUAL - •'a 149271 06/10/85 1.50 TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL e i 149271 06/10/85 226.25 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANLAL «.' -- 149271 U6 /10TE 9'877:13- 'INTERCONTINENTAL' -PK 50- 4626 - 822 -82 "�""' "-- "-- _ - " --- MANUr"L - T +� 149271 06/10/85 14.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 822 -82 PANLAL 149271 06/10/85 39012.85 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 149271 - -D- 6710785 16:50 INTER- CONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -8 MANUAL - " "- -" 149271 06/101f! 6,010.79 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL a l„ 149271 - 0.6/10/85 29.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 149271 - 06 NTERCONTINENTAL-PK 50- 4628 - 842 =84 - -- MANUAL" -� +- 149271 06/10/85 3.90 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL j e 149271 06/10185 101975 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 862 -86 PANUAL -,- 149271'II671078 .bO-- INTETC -ON 71NENTAL P K 50 -4628- 862 -86 PANUAL J,, 149271 06/10/85 8.40- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL IT.ia 149271 06/10185 19306.60 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL , q. 1 1985 . OF EDINA CHECK . STER 05 -31 -8- AGE 15 f_ �CHEC"Oo OXTE AROUNI VENDOR ITE-ESCRIP -rION y1CCOUNT- NO —INY-.-- *-P.O.-#-MESSAGE -T;, = 3 149433 ' 14v123.90 • 50 -4628- 822 -82 120.12 '�' 149433 06/10/85 2.55 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 :•j-- 149433 06110/85 61]8:40-- AUSrIS-3-S ON s 50- 4628 - 862 -86- 149433 06/10,/85 10.50- PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 +rr -CKS le ' 10.50 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 149285 078110-/85 OHNS-ON -UTN 50 - 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL-- -11I -, --7-.-29- „ 149433 49 285 06/10/85 7.29- JO -MNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ale' 19 608940- 149285 06/10/85 8.46- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL _ — 149285 -06110/25 — 14.,73■- -- JO14NSON-WIME - - --- - 50- 3710 - 842 -84 -- -- MANUAL - - - -i , �., 149435 149285 06/10/85 8.46- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 0.6/10/85 4.94- PRIOR WINE CO 149285 06/10/85 4.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANLAL �^,) 149435 06/10/85 149285 06/10185 6:67- JOHNSON -LINE -50- 3710- 862 -86 ----- MANUAL - -- 06/10/8`. 149285 06/10/85 11.28- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ` 149285 06/10/85 423.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 _ MANUAL L 1 49 285 --- 0 6/10 /85 1 J OHNSON- iINE- -' 50- 4626 - 822 -82— -- -._. MANLAL---- � . 149285 06/10/85 364.96 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL x6/10/85 149295 06'/10/8 6.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANLAL -- 149285- 06110/85 364;2-3 wlOHNS-O"T-NE 50 -4628- 822 -82 - - - -- MANUAL -- 149285 0.6/10/85 4.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 149285 06'/10/85 2.70 6OHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 149285' 06110/65 -736.85 -"-- JO*1NSON-liINE —` 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - -- MANUAL -` 149285 06/10/85 217.15 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 149285 06/10/85 12.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 149285— 06110/85 42332 JOHNSON -WI'VE 5 ^- 4628- 842 -84 - MANUAL- -- 149285 06/10/85 2.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL `i -- 149285 06/10/85 13.80, JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ MANUAL -.i '- 149285- 06710 /85 833,52 - "JOHNSON VINE '— - 50- 4628- 862 -86 - --- - MANUAL 149285 06/10/85 564.01 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANLAL _ 149285 06/10/85 6.30 --899 -ti JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 _- MANUAL I 149433 06'/10/85 50 -4628- 822 -82 120.12 PAUSTIS 9 SONS 149433 06/10/85 2.55 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 :•j-- 149433 06110/85 61]8:40-- AUSrIS-3-S ON s 50- 4628 - 862 -86- 149433 06/10,/85 10.50- PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 149433 06'/10/85 10.50 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 ` - 149433--- 06/10/E5 - 60'8.40-- PAUSTIS - -6 -SONS— -' 50 -4628- 862 -86- „ 149433 06/10/85 10.50 PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 149433 06/10/85 608940- PAUSTIS 8 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 1'j 741;59 tartar �._ 149435 06/10/85 7009- PRIOR WINE CO 149435 0.6/10/85 4.94- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 842 -84 �--T- 149435 0-6/10/1 5 2.91 PRIOR-VINE-CO, 50- 3710 - 862 -86- �^,) 149435 06/10/85 354.68 PRIOR ALINE CO 50 -4628- 822 -82 �. 149435 06/10/8`. 246.80 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 842 -84 '14943 5 06/10/85 145o50— PRIOR-VINE-CO 50- 4628 - 862 -86- �„ 732,04 • sa ]9 35 149451 x6/10/85 7.79- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 4w r** -CKS MANLAL MANUAL - MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANLAL - MANUAL MANLAL * * * -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL- MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL- MANUAL 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 16 MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL iR MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL +•+ -CKS ,T • -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ; a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m +a +raa *++ -CKS I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - - 18.941.00 + fl'1� -- - ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51 I,.d ,uaaa+ 155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , , ,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82 MANUAL CHECK -N O. DAIL ANDUNI 11E-"ES-CR7PTTGIN­—ACCoUNT--NO. INV---- f1-P--0: S-- MESSAGE 149540 06/10/85 11.19- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 149 5 4U------0-671 0"5— 6:72 - � 50 -3710- 862 -86 149451 06/10/85 7.54- QUALITY VINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ' 149540 06/10/85 149451 - 06/10/85 — "- 18.00= QUALITY- WINE -' S0- 3710 - 822 -E2- -- MANUAL -- - -6.30 -� -- -50 -4628- 862 -86 -- -, - -- 149451 06/10/85 21.72- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 FANUAL �, 149451 06/10/85 .26 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 'MANUAL I- ' _'151174---------O67/C4'/8 149451frb /10185 3:49— — �UALiTY- 1tINE- �� 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUaL- _I-- nf 149451 06/10/85 5.52- QUALITY WINE `� 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL c 1 149451 06/101P5 29.83- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL I "I- 149451 - 06-/10/85 - 12.39=-- -9UALIT1r -- WINE --' - -" ---50 -3710- 862 -86 —` -- --MANUAL - I 149451 06/10/85 .66- QUALITY VINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANLAL 1 _- 149451 06/10/85 81.13- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862.86 MANUAL 149451 06/10/85 - -8.97- OUALITT- "WINE 50- 3710- 862 =86 - - -- MANUAL ; -1 _'•-� 149451 06/10/85 945.25 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ri 149451 - -_ 06/10/85 1.086.01 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MAN UAL I� 149451 C6 /1018 5- - -33.40 GUALITT'WINE - - -- 50- 4626- 862 -86 "` - -- -' MANUAL r1 l 149451 06/10/85 4.056.37 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 149451 - -- 06/10485 389.60 GUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL _ C 149457-- �U6/1078 377 :44 - 0UACITY-11INE 50= 4628 = 822 -82 MANUAL 149451 06/10/85 674.61 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL i 149451 06/101115 1.491.58 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 149451 6/10/85_ 276.24+' QUALITY'WINE- 50- 4628 - 842 =84 ---- - -.. -_ MANUAL - -- `' -�•� 149451 06/10/85 13.40- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .•t� 149451 06/10185 619.82 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL '- 14945; 001Ic- 185' -- 448 -:57 -QUAILIIV WINE- 0- 4628=862 -86 - - - ---- MANUAL 10.178.31 + MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL iR MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL +•+ -CKS ,T • -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ; a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m +a +raa *++ -CKS I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - - 18.941.00 + fl'1� -- - ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51 I,.d ,uaaa+ 155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , , ,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82 MANUAL If — +ra -CKS MANUAL 149540 06/10/85 11.19- TWIN CITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 149 5 4U------0-671 0"5— 6:72 - TWIN -CI`TT -WINE- 50 -3710- 862 -86 si•,� 149540 U6/10/85 559.58 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 149540 06/10/85 8.40 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 149540 C- 6/10T85 - -6.30 TWIN- CITY - WINE - -- -- -50 -4628- 862 -86 -- -, - -- 149540 06/10/85 336920 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 892.57 + - � aataaa _'151174---------O67/C4'/8 5 "in - 00n - -nn 1 ST- ---- - — MANUAL MANUAL - MANUAL iR MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL +•+ -CKS ,T • -a. SOUTHOALE BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010- 000 -00 '-- _.- -.-- -- -MANUAL - -- ; a 151174 06/C4/85 110.000.00 1ST SOUT +OALE BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL m +a +raa *++ -CKS I . , 151430 QblOS7�5- 1E-v4100 `� STATE- TREASUREit PERA-EMP -CChT �10= 41 45= 510 =51 - -`- -- - - 18.941.00 + fl'1� -- - ws 151523 06/04/85 9066.83 STATE TREASURER FICA EMP CON7 10- 4149 - 510 -51 I,.d ,uaaa+ 155067 06/10/85 588.89 CAPITAL C ;TY DISTRI ._F 50.4628.82282 155067 06/10/85 I P 7 r "A, , , ,r:-- :i0.4628 +822 -82 MANUAL If — +ra -CKS MANUAL ;G a +a -CKS MANUAL Y -. 1985 L OF EOINA CHECK , -STER 05 -31 -8. AGE 17 _ (,- - ,- CHECK -n0: DA•T 155067 06/10/85 °- - 155067`- "C6/10>85 115C67 06/10/85 155067 06/10/85 155129 06/10/E5 - A MOUN I 298.40 -5:85 11925 874.49 3,221.25 39221.25 r VENDOR -TEM-OESCitIP-1-ION CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL-CITY- DISTRT -- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI EELLBOY ACCOUNT--NO.-INW.-- A--P.O-i- #- 50- 4628- 842 -84 5C- 4628- 842 -84 -- 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4626- 842 -84 MESSAGE--- ---[,, MANUAL ---- PANU.AL- ------- i ?, MANUAL MANUAL rrr -CKS r„ MANUAL I1 �, .i 4rrrlr ` -- - - ---* ++-CKS - 155135-- C6 /10 /ES — "3.97- EAGLE"-NINE - -" 50- 3710 - 822 -82— ---- MANUtL'— 155135 06/10/E5 14.35- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 PANLAL L- 155135 06/10185 17.68- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 155135-- D.6/10/85 98:53 - EAGLE -WIN 50- 4628- 822 -82 - -- MANUAL - -- 155135 C6 /10 /E5 717.59 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155135 06/10/85 '884.13 EAGLE arNE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I_ :,� -� - -- ---- - - - - -- � 764:2 5 -� -- —_ —_ _ _--- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -:.... "� rrrr►r CKS i .1 155138 06/10/ES 402- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL -- 155138 06/10/E5 3.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL -� 15 513 8 06/10/85- -- 82:13- ED- PHILLIPS " --" - - -'-- -- 50 -3710- 842 -84 - - -- MANUAL - I,� 155138 06/10/E5 13.74- ED PHILLIPS 5C- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL . 155138 06/10185 7.31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL j ;; -- 155138 C6710/E5 6.39- ED- PFIIL"LIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- MANUAL - - -, 155138 U.6/10/85 20.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL -I -, 155138 U6/10/E5 16.23- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ' 15513E u6/101E5 11.5 ILLIPS -- — --50-3710-862-86 4,106.26 ED PHILLIPS - ----"- '- --"- 50- 4626- 842 -84 -MANUAL PANUAL 155138 U611GY85 205.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL !„ 155138- 6110f85 1'73:90 -ED- PHILLIPS - 50- 4628- 822 -82 - -- -MANUAL - I,, 15513E /155138 U6/10/85 365.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �1551 38—`-U6110/85 06/10/85 686.90 020.00- ED PHILLIPS ED_PHILLIPS - 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 862- 86--- - - - - - MANUAL -- MANUAL 155138 T 06/10/85 578.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 PANLAL 15513E 06/10/E5 811.65 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ' i;_; — "15 -319:-46--- ED-PHIttIPS -50- 4628- 862 -86 - MANUAL -- �••� 8,103.D9 r 155190 C6/10/E5 70.69- GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1551 9[ — 06710785 26 -.58— GR- IGGS- COOPER--AND-C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- -- MANUAL 155190. 06/10/85 3,534.52 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 15519Q 06/10185 1,329.10 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 4 176 6:34 -+ -- _.I rrrrrr 155271 06/10/85 155271 06/10/85 3.75 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 2.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 t� + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL 0 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -85 PAGE 18 1. 1 CHECK- NO: -DAT 4OUN EN011R— ITEM- TER ' ACCOUNT'NO-.-TNY- O-P.O.- N- MESSAGE- `1:' 155271 06/10/E5 4.09- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -E4 MANUAL 1 I' ` 5271 '---- 06/10!85 55.45w 'INTERCONTTNENTAL'-PK_ 50-3710-6842-84---­­ - MANUAL__- _F z 155271 06/10/85 5.05- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL I_- 155271 06/10/85 -/85 29772..72 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 .MANLAL ��` 155271 06- 110 2.00 - INTERCONTINENTAL -PK- 50- 4626- 842 -84- MANUAL---- - .IOW 155271 06/10/85 1.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 155271 06/10/85 252.55 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL t 155271-'— `U6/10/85 -- 2.10 — INTERCONTINENTAL' "PK "` '50- 4628- 822 -82 - - - 'MANL'AL - -" - ; =• 155271 06/10/85 187.85 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 155271 06/10/8! 204.80 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .'�155Z71 -- 06/10/85 104 ,35— INTERCONTINENTAL PK 30 -4628= 842 -84 - MANUAL 155271 06/10/85 .90 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -E4 MANUAL JI,-I - 155271 06/10/E5 1.20 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 1 -- -- - I �i „I �,� .frf.f - - - - -- -- - - - - -- fff- - - - - -- -CKS I:- 155285 06/10/85 6.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -E4 MANUAL 155285 06/10/85 14.01- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL I !� 5285`L6/10/L5" --- 23 :73� JOHNS ON_W ? NE- —” 50- 3710 - 842- 84- - - --"- MAKUAI " -, 155285 U6/10/85 6.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL . 155285 06/10/E5 `061107E5 14.01- JOHNSON WINE -WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I -� 5 2285— 3:91- jCHNSON 50- 3710- 862 -E6 MANUAL" ' 155285 06/10/E5 700.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ,I 155285 06/10/85 300 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL Iry hoI "- 155285' 0671x/85 — 155295 ^6/10185 155295 06/10/E5 - -3.R0 700.90 23.70 JOHNSON °WINE" -- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50-4626-862-86----- 50- 4626- 862-86 50- 4628- 842 -84 ---- ' "- MAAIAI - - MANUAL MANLAL -- t 111155285 ----a- 671078 -420— JOHNSON -WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -E4 - -- -" MANUAL-- - L1 155285 06/10/95 19196.91 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL l� 155285 -- -- 06/10/E5 321.75 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155285 06/10/85 `333:37 JOHNSON- LINE - 50- 4628- 862- 86 - - - -" - - -- MANUAL 155285 06/10/85 3.30 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I s� 155285 U 6/10/85 195.79 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANLAL r, I»1 155285 L•b7101F 6.30 JOHNSON -BIN 50- 4628- 862 -86 ----- MANUAL -- - -- ._ �I 39414.37 r - I-, f.. -CKS 155435 06/10/85 "-- 4.30- -3 PRIOR -WINE CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL �_ e 55435 D6 110CF :4 PRIOR - VINE -00 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - - -- - -- MANUAL " 155435 126/10/85 .43 PRIOR MINE CO 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL L,;! 155435 06/10/85 .43- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - _ i« ._ 155435 "06110%85 21 .48- PRIOR- "47INr-00 " - - -- 50 -4628- 842- E4 MANUAL „ 155435 06/10/85 21.48 FRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL a„ 155435 C6/10/85 214.80 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 842 -E4 MANUAL -'- 155103`— O -7 T078 5 2l_e4l8-______PRnK Ml E7__CU 50=4628- 842=84 -MANUAL-- - -•� 1E9.45 I *.f -CKS 51 155451 06/10/85 8.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 5,--155451 --OS /10-78 . 1=-- NUACIT"r-N 50 -3710- 822""82 MANUAL-- �I» 155451 06/101.85 23.08- CUALIT!T TINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 14 15. 5451 06/10125 14.94- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' a • � r 1985 OF EDINA CHECK STER �O5 -31 -8 AGE 19 I i I i 7. 7r -- CHECK -NO. CATE A OUN VENDOR - 7Eft -CESZ •- RIPIION-- ACCOUNT-N0-IkY f-P O.--*- MESSAGE 1 �,� FUND 26 TOTAL 155451 06/10/85 13.99- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ' GOLF- COURSE-FUNC— Hand typed checks - 155451 06/10/'85 -4:32= QUALITY - VINE -- - 50- 3710 - 862 --86 - - MANUAL- - - -; q 75.61 155451 06/10/85 ?6.40- GUALIT,Y 6INE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANLAL - -- - 21590.89 - - FUND -44 -TOTAL - G 155451 06/10/t5 27949- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - ,a 371 -155451 06/10/85 11154.39--- OUALITY-11TNE - 50- 4626- 842 -84 - - •MANUAL �. CHECK RC 11IS7 =R f'TCD 155451 155451 06/10/85 06/10/85 1.374.85 431.71 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL o QUALITY NINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL " I, -- 155451 -06/101?? - 445:55--- OUOLTTY- WINE ---- 50- 4628- 822 -82 - MANUAL-- - FINANCE DIRLCTOR DATE 155451 06/10/85 747.13 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �- 155451 06/10/85 699.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 155451- 06/10-/85 1.820.02 QUALITY -SINE- 50- 4628- 862 -tE - - MANUAI 155451 06/10/85 21605 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL IC 69751.54 1,- aaaaaa aa• -CKS r, 155540 C, 61101E 0:09 ------ 7—TWIN -CfTY -DINE -50- 3710- 842-64 - --MAN A - -- i. 15554U 06/10185 9.93- TWIN CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I,. 155540 06/10/85 8.40 TWIN CDTY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ Z 155540 ti6 /1C /85- -504.73--- -1 WIN-CITT- WINE- 50- 4628- 842- 84-- - - - - -- MANUAL -' d 155540 06/10/85 9.30 TWIN CITY WINE 56 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i,, 155540 C6 /10M 496.73 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL -- 999:14 -_I 17! ta••aa CKS ; -i_ - `- '-196040.87 FUND- 10- TOTAL --- GENERAL FL'AD --- - - -- - - - - -- - - - I i I i 7. 7r 386.09 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 1 66.26 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND ;-199;4 FUND-2-7-TOT-AL GOLF- COURSE-FUNC— Hand typed checks li's 62157 2157 3 465.72 FUND 2? TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND thru 62178, 62184 thru 75.61 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 63259 thru 6338 -- - -- - 21590.89 - - FUND -44 -TOTAL --UTILITY—FUND------- - -- - -- - - -- .. --------- --- -._ ._. 3049350.10 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND ,a 371 5,15-g975-0-3- CHECK RC 11IS7 =R f'TCD - -- CITY MANAGER DATE n � FINANCE DIRLCTOR DATE ,I nl I i I i 7. 7r