HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-07-15_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JULY 15, 1985.
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of the Regular and Special Meetings of June 17, 1985 approved as submitted
or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four- fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. R -1 to PRD -3 for Brutger Companies - Generally located west of Cahill
Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Foster Green Addition
2. Lot 4, Block 2, Warden Acres Austin Replat - Generally located south of
Grove Street and east of 'Oak Lane
C. Zoning Change
1. First Reading
R -1 to R -2 District - Robert Anderson - 425 Washington Avenue South
D. Conditional Use Permit
1. Creek Valley Baptist Church - Generally located south of Crosstown
Highway and west of Tracy Avenue
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Building Removal &..Backfill - Wooddale School
B. Falls Model TAH -9 Snow Plow Wings
C. Repair Pump for Well #6
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 9, 19815
B. Edina Community Center Five Year Plan Report
C. Airplane Noise
D. Set Hearing Date - Special Assessments (9/16/85)
E. Blake School Driveway Access
F. Appointments - Edina Foundation /Planning Commission /Board of Appeals/
Advisory Board of Health
G. Consumer Deposit - Watermain No. 335 - 3800 West 55th Street
H. Umbrella Insurance
I. Feasibility Report - P -BA No. 262 & P -S 734 - Set Hearing Date (8/5/85)
J. Set Hearing Date - Edinborough Utilities & Amendments to Agreement to
Southeast Edina Redevelopment (8/19/85)
K. Edina Prosecution Report
L. Fire Department Organization /Paramedic Program
M. Special Concerns of. Mayor and Council
N. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote.by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Resolution Relating to $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985; $1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985;
Authorizing the Issuance and Calling for Public Sale Thereof.
Edina City Council
Agenda
July 15, 1985
Page Two
VI. FINANCE.
A. Liquor Fund Report as of 5/31/85
B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of
the following calims dated 7/15/85: General Fund $86,405.25, Art Center $6,881.82,
Swimming Pool Fund $1,205.90, Golf Course Fund $74,754.97, Recreation Center Fund
$3,530.50, Utility Fund $14,511.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $89,437.88, Construct-
ion Fund $296,965.50, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $7,265.99, Total $580,959.67
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday July 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday July 22 Special Council Meeting - Strategic Plan, 5:00 p.m. Mgr. Conf. Rm.
Short Term Objectives for 1986
Monday Aug 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday Aug 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday Sept 2 Labor Day - CITY HALL CLOSED
Monday Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday Sept 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
...�
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 17, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
MINUTES of the Regular Council Meetings of May 6 and May 20, 1985, were approved
as submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. 85 -5
AUTHORIZED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Hoffman recalled that the Council at its meeting of January 21,
1985, had heard the report of the consulting engineering firm, Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch,
Inc., who had been commissioned by the City to study the traffic operations and
safety characteristics of W. 70th Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue.
One of the recommendations of the study was to signalize the 70th Street and Cor-
nelia Drive intersection to enhance pedestrian safety in the neighborhood adjacent
to the school and park. The Council gave concept approval to several of the
recommendations and authorized the staff to prepare and send a signal justification
report to the State of Minnesota for approval. The State has approved funding of
one -half of the cost of the signal installation from State Aid funds. Mr. Hoffman
advised that the cost of the signal installation is estimated at $70,000.00 and
that the remaining one -half of the cost or $35,000.00 requires a local funding
source. The three proposed alternatives for funding the local share of the project
are: 1) City General Fund, 2) City General Funds and School District Funds, and
3) Special Assessment of neighborhood.at an estimated assessment of $42.00 per single
family residence. Because pedestrian safety is one of the factors, Mr. Hoffman
explained that the proposed.area to be assessed is bounded approximately by West
Shore Drive on the west, West 66th Street on the north, Valley View Road and Lynmar
Lane on the east and Gilford Drive on the south. This is the approximate walking
area for students attending Cornelia School. The construction of the project, if
approved, is proposed to occur in the Fall of 1985. If a portion of the project
costs are assessed, the assessments would be levied in 1986 with the assessment
payable in 1987. Mr. Hoffman advised that this hearing is to seek authorization
of the project and to discuss what funding method to use to provide the local share.
Member Bredesen asked if the City's General Fund has previously paid for traffic
signals. Mr. Hoffman responded that this has not been Council policy in the past and
explained further that two legs of the subject intersection are local streets and
do not qualify for State Aid funds. Persons speaking in objection to the traffic
light and /or the special assessment funding were: Kathy Lucas, 4212 W. 70th Street;
Paul Green, 6945 Southdale Road, and Donald Johnson, 7137 Cornelia Drive. Donna
Fry, 7208 Heatherton Circle and Gary Chlebowski supported using the General Fund
of the City to fund the project. Sandy Phillips, 6817 Point Drive, urged. .Council ...
to proceed with the traffic signal project. There being no further discussion,
Member Turner made a motion to authorize the traffic control signal system improve-
ment, with the understanding that the funding method would be by special assess-
ment to the School District and the City. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Member Turner stated that in.this situation the primary justification for the
warrants for the signal was the pedestrian crossing at this intersection as the
result of the school located there. Because there are district -wide programs at
Cornelia, Member Turner stated she felt the School District should be assessed,
together with the other benefited property_ owner, the City, because of the park.
located there.which is used by families from all over the City. Member Richards
commented that he could not support the motion because part.of.the impetus for
the traffic signal came from the residents of the area who argued the need for
the signalization that would be a benefit to the properties. He agreed that a.
portion.of. the one -half not funded by.State Aid should be picked up by the City
and the School District, and that a portion should be picked up by the affected
neighborhood that will particularily benefit by the signal. Mayor Courtney
then called for rollcall vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner
Nays: Bredesen, Richards, Courtney
.Motion failed.
Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption,
with the recommendation that the one -half of the construction cost not funded
by State Aid funds be assessed one -third to the City, one -third to the School
District and one -third to benefited property owners as identified in the
staff report:
RESOLUTION ORDERING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT NO. 85 -8; S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners
6/17/85
of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on a portion of the cost
of the following proposed improvement:
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. 85 -8
West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully
advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the con-
_, struction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary
in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for con-
struction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby
designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as TRAFFIC
CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. 85 -8 and the area that may be assessed for
a portion of the cost of the proposed improvement is bounded approximately by West
Shore Drive on the west, West 66th Street on the north, Valley View Road and Lynmar
Lane on the east and Gilford Drive on the south.
Motion for adoption of,the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ZONING CHANGE AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES REFERRED TO PLANNING
COMMISSION FOR REVIEW...Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and
ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen advised that the subject property is
located west of Cahill Road, south of Dewey Hill Road and more specifically, north
of'`tlie Windwood Condominiums and east and south of the Dewey Hill Condominiums.
Preliminary rezoning was granted at the Council's April 1, 1985 meeting. On May 29
the Community Development and Planning Commission considered the final development
plans for the site and approved the preliminary plat. The proponent, Brutger Com-
panies, has returned with final development plans and is requesting final rezoning
and preliminary plat approval. The plans show the same footprint of 50 units, vary-
ing from the traditional townhouse unit (two.floors) to a flat (one floor). All of
the units in the development would be sold as condominiums. The buildings as pro-
posed will be a combination of brick and cedar siding on the exterior with asphalt
shingles., Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance has requirements for
landscaping. On a site this size it would require 50 overstory trees (deciduous
and coniferous trees). The landscaping plan submitted shows a total of 118 overstory
trees, 39 of which are specified as 4" in diameter as opposed to the 22" requirement
in the Ordinance. All the remaining overstory trees meet the standards of the Ordi-
nance. The Planning Commission recommended final rezoning and preliminary plat
approval for the project, subject to: 1) final platting, 2) subdivision dedication,
and 3) developer's agreement. Member Richards asked that the proposed landscaping
plan be characterized as compared to the landscaping that has been implemented on
the properties to the North and to the South. Mr. Larsen stated that the locust
trees'..-that are proposed at 4" in diameter for this project are the same as the decid-
uous..'trees on the Dewey Hill Condomiums. site. The coniferous trees proposed for
.this site are 6' as required by the Ordinance as opposed to 10 to 12 feet coniferous
trees that were shown on the Dewey Hill site. The proposed landscaping plan.does
rely on existing material along the northerly boundary. Steve Wilson, of Brutger
Companies, explained that a registered landscape architect was hired to develop the
landscaping plan. In looking at the adjoining properties, what was done was to try
to get a good mix of coniferous and deciduous trees between adjoining properties.
The Dewey Hill Condominiums on the North is more .heavily planted with coniferous
trees and the landscape architect decided to go with deciduous trees on that side to
provide amore balanced landscape plan. On the South it was noted that Windwood
Condominiums is more heavily landscaped with a natural stand of deciduous trees,
therefore, coniferous trees were proposed for that border. Member Bredesen asked
if in total the proposed landscape plan for the subject site represents as intensive
a landscaping plan, with the relative degree of maturity, as is the case with the
two abutting properties. Mr. Larsen responded that it was not, that Gittleman's
Dewey Hill property is the most heavily landscaped plan that staff has seen, far
above average. Windwoods to the South has landscaping that has been in place for
some time and has matured. Appearing and speaking in opposition to the rezoning
and preliminary plat for Brutger Companies were: John Forciea, Alvin Miller, David
McEnary, Earl Nelson_'and Doris Pryor, all of 5501 Dewey Hill.Rd and Paul Thomas,`of
Windwood Condominiums. Concerns expressed were density, inadequate landscaping,
close proximity of proposed buildings, compatibility of the development to existing
abutting properties and building height. Mr. Wilson responded that density, build -
ing placement and building height are issues that have been addressed and that
Brutger Companies has complied with what the City requested with regard to those
issues. Preliminary rezoning was granted on the condition that before final rezon-
ing the landscaping and grading plans would be adequate to protect surrounding
properties. Mr. Wilson added that they have complied with that condition and
have addressed the landscaping issue with the plans presented which are far in
excess-of the standards set"by the City in the Zoning Ordinance. No further public
comment being heard, Member Richards made a motion to refer the zoning change and
- 6/17/85
preliminary plat approval for Brutger Companies back to the Planning Commission
and staff for review of the landscape plan to determine whether or not it is
consistent with the adjoining properties, to provide an opportunity for the
neighbors to offer their comments, and to then bring it back to the Council for
action. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Member Richards stated that
at preliminary rezoning comments were made that there would be an extraordinary
effort made on the landscaping plan and that there be an exchange of information
with the neighbors who will be affected by this development. He stated further
that he felt the developer has not responded to the concerns of the neighbors
and the Council. Member Turner stated that the landscape plan was also her
concern at preliminary rezoning but suggested that the matter be continued to
permit the developer to meet with the neighbors on the landscaping issue and
not refer it back to the Planning Commission. Member Bredesen commented that
he felt the proposed landscaping plan should have a formal review by the Planning
Commission and staff to determine if it is consistent with the adjoining properties.
Following further discussion, Mayor Courtney called for a rollcall vote on the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes:. Bredesen, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Kelly, Turner
Motion carried.
BOARD.OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DECISION UPHELD REGARDING 4528 BRUCE AVENUE.
Planner Craig Larsen advised that, the subject property is located at 4528 Bruce Av.,
just north of Bridge Street on the west side of the street. The property is a
vacant, platted 50 foot wide lot which is owned by the northerly adjacent
property owner. On May 16, 1985 the Board of Appeals and Adjustments considered
a 25 foot lot width variance request to permit construction of a new dwelling.
The Board granted the lot width variance with the following conditions: 1) that
a survey be provided verifying that the lot was 50 feet in width, and 2) that
the building plans for the house be approved by the Heritage Preservation Board.
On May 24, 1985 an appeal from the Board's.decision.was received from Peter Mahon,
4530 Bruce Avenue. Since that time the proponent has submitted a survey of the
property indicating that the lot is indeed 50 feet wide. Plans for a house on
the property were considered by the Heritage Preservation Board on May 28, 1985
and were rejected by the Board. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the subject property
is a 50 foot wide platted lot that has.been held in common ownership with the
adjacent lot since 1951. The Zoning Ordinance requires therefore that a lot
width variance be granted before the.lot would be buildable. The subject property
is the last remaining vacant parcel on this block of Bruce Avenue. Twenty -five
of 32 lots fronting on this block of Bruce Avenue are 50 feet in width, and
except for the two northerly corner lots, the remainder measure 55 feet in width.
Similar lot sizes are found on both Arden and Casco Avenues. Staff had recom-
mended approval of the variance request to the Board of Appeals. Peter Mahon
then explained that he had appealed the Board's decision for several reasons,
that without a survey it did not look like a buildable lot, the building plans
submitted did not meet code with regard to the fireplace and that a variance
request should address the issue of hardship. Mr. Mahon also expressed a concern
regarding the pooling of water in the spring on the southwest corner of the vacant
lot and that any change of grade may cause such pooling to move to his property.
Member Richards asked if Mr. Mahon was still opposed to the recognition of the
50 foot lot. ..Mr.. Mahon stated he.did.not take issue with building on a 50 foot
lot, but was,not.sure how to reconcile the fact that there is only 48' between
the edge of the driveway and the lot line and apparently his own sidewalk
encroaches on the vacant lot. Jeff Gustafson, 7315 Tara Road, stated that he
has a purchase agreement on the subject lot and the northerly adjacent property.
Mr. Gustafson stated that there..is approximately 9 /10_of a foot of Mr. Mahon's
sidewalk that is on the vacant lot, that the fence is one foot over the property
line and that he had told Mr. Mahon that this could be taken care of by easement
or deed. Mr..Gustafson stated he had met -with the Heritage Preservation Board
and has hired a different designer to come up with a house that will fit into
the neighborhood. Karen Kaplan, 4527 Bruce Avenue, asked on what basis the
variance was granted and stated that there was no hardship involved in this case.
Member Richards pointed out that it would be unfair not to allow this lot to be
developed in view of the fact that 25 of the 32 lots fronting on this block
are 50 foot lots and that 7 of them are 55 foot lots and that the proponent is
asking for no more or no less than what those 25 lots got. There being no further
comment, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to move adoption
of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby concludes that the procedural
requirements of Ordinance No. 825 have been met, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the decision by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments
to grant the lot width variance request for Lot 15, Block 4, Country Club District
Fairway Section (4528 Bruce Avenue) is upheld and the variance should be granted.
6/17/85
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS EXPRESSED. Ray Ehlers, 4212 W. 70th Street, made the follow-
ing comments: 1 that the striping from France Avenue to Valley View Road was con-
fusing drivers, 2) that he understood the Valley View Road exit onto W. 70th Street
was to be closed but has not been, 3) whether there was any possibility that the
on /off ramps at Hwy. 100 and W. 66th Street could be reopened and 4) that signing
be placed at France Avenue /W. 66th Street indicating access to southbound Hwy. 100
from W. 66th Street. Engineer Hoffman responded that the striping on W. 70th Street
is not completed and will when finished guide cars into the one lane section, that
the Valley View Road exit onto W. 70th Street will be closed shortly, that when
Hwy. 100 was reconstructed the steep grade was eliminated by lowering the roadway.
and that ramps at W. 66th Street to the north would cause a dangerous situation
as they would have to interface with the Crosstown exists and that staff will look
at possible signing at France and W. 66th Street. Bertha Erickson, 7320 York Avenue,
stated that.she felt that the $18,500,000 Revenue Bonds for the Edinborough project
to provide 203 rental units for the elderly, of which only 40 units would be reserved
for low and moderate income persons, would provide far too much money to the developer
at a low rate of interest and that the 40 units reserved for low and moderate income
persons did not begin to meet those needs in the City. James Grotz, 5513 Park Place,
expressed his concern that the civil defense sirens in his area were not activated
on Sunday, June 16, when the sirens were sounded within the metropolitan area and
urged that this be remedied. Mr. Hoffman stated that there were several sirens in
the City that did not go off because there was a problem in the phone line system
which should be eliminated shortly when the radio activated system is in place.
No formal action was taken by the Council regarding these concerns.
INSURANCE RENEWALS AWARDED. Mr. Rosland advised that staff has been working on get-
ting quotes for the City's liability, worker compensation and property insurance.
Unfortunately, the responses have been less than positive and the insurance companies
are reluctant to split out the premiums for the various coverages. Penco quoted a
premium of $300,000 for liability coverage but did not quote worker compensation
coverage. Quotation received from the League of Minnesota Cities showed liability
and workers compensation at $515,930 and property at $122,566:. Quotation from Home
Insurance Company for liability and worker compensation insurance was approximately
$448,500. This quotation is a three -line retro in which a formula containing a loss
control factor, a tax factor, a basic factor and losses incurred are used to compute
a final premium. The premium is payable at 40% down, 30% after three months and
30% after six months. Quotations for property insurance were: Hartford at $45,308,
Kemper at $46,331, American International at $57,000, Zurich at $62,000, Great
American at $73,700, Home Insurance at $85,634 and Fireman's Fund at $75,000.
Staff would recommend award of quotation to Home Insurance for liability and
worker compensation insurance and to Hartford for property insurance. Mr. Rosland
advised that we have no definite quotations for the City's umbrella coverage and
paramedic malpractice coverage but will continue to pursue renewals. Member Brede-
sen raised the question of a reduced premium if the City took the risk of a deducti-
ble of $100,000. Mr. Rosland responded that we must have insurance renewals in
effect by July 1, 1985 but that staff would attempt to get quotations based on a
deductible of $100,000. Member Turner moved to award quotation to Home Insurance
Company for liability and worker compensation insurance and to Hartford for property
insurance, subject to determining if a lower premium is available with a deductible
tied in. Motion was seconded by Member Richards.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR UTILITY VAN.. Mr. Rosland presented bids for a van for the Utility
Department showing Suburban Chevrolet at $9,539.90, Rosedale Chevrolet at $9,936.60
and Freeway Ford at $10,128.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly
for award of bid to recommended low bidder Suburban Chevrolet at $9,539.90.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE. Mr. Rosland presented quotes for a 4 -door
sedan for Administration showing Walser Buick at $11,805.00, Win Stephens Buick at
$12,063.00 and Nelson - Lenzen at $13,284.00. Member Turner's motion was seconded by
Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder Walser Buick at $11,805.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR SPRINKLER MODIFICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER PARKING LOTS. Bids
were presented by Mr. Rosland for sprinkler modications for the Edina Community
Center parking lots showing Green Acres Sprinkler Company at $8,265.00 and Albrecht
Landscape at $8,400.00. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Turner for
6/17/85
award of bid to recommended low bidder Green Acres Sprinkler Company at $8,265.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JUNE 11, 1985 APPROVED. There being no
requests on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends approval or denial,
Member Bredesen's motion to acknowledge Section C of the Traffic Safety Committee
Minutes of June 11, 1985 was seconded by Member Richards.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CDBG FUNDS APPROVED FOR WOODHAVEN PROJECT. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Council
granted preliminary rezoning approval to PSR -4 for Woodhaven on April 1, 1985.
This proposed project includes 29 units designed for senior citizen occupancy
and is.located west of Summit Avenue and south of Interlachen Boulevard. Sponsors
for the project are the Community Development Corporation (a division of the
Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis) and a group of Edina churches. A letter
from the Community Development Corporation (CDC) outlines the present status of
the project. In short, the sponsoring churches have raised 75% of their goal of
$75,000 and are now asking that the City of Edina commit $195,000 toward the
project. The source of the commitment would be from Community Development Block.
Grants (CDBG) principally; some funds may be repaid from the tax increment district
that the property is located in. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the City has parti-
cipated in several similar low and moderate income housing projects, e.g. Yorkdale
Townhouses, Oak Glen and Southhaven. The City has funded the major portion of the
cost necessary to acquire the property for these projects. It is proposed that
the City fund $195;000 of the $212,000 land acquisition cost for Woodhaven. In
past cases, the City has agreed to its financial commitment at the time of final
zoning and redevelopment contract approval. In this case, a preliminary commitment
is request to assist in securing financing from the Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD). Mr. Hughes explained that HUD has become more stringent
with their rules and the preliminary commitment would demonstrate to HUD the City's
willingness to do the project. Currently there is a balance of $178,192 in the
CDBG budget for land acquisition. The remaining funds could be provided by re-
programming other CDBG accounts or through the tax increment process. Staff would
recommend that the City agree to a preliminary commitment of not more than $195,000,
subject to execution of an acceptable redevelopment project at the time of final
rezoning. Larry Laukka, chairman of the lay committee for the project, advised
that the sponsors do control the site under an option that would be granted to
the City should HUD select this project for a mortgage. Funds from the Federal
government, the City of Edina and the community must be pledged to be able to
build the.proposed project.. An application for mortgage funds and for rental..
assistance has been submitted on behalf of Woodhaven to HUD who..will assign funds
by October, 1985. James Grotz, 5513 Park Place, stated he objected to CDBG funds
being given to the proposed Woodhaven project. Member Bredesen pointed out that
there are three parts to this, funds from HUD, the City and the community to allow
the facility to be built to provide low income housing for elderly people. No
further comment being heard, Member Turner moved.adoption of the following resolu-
tion:
RFg0T.TTTT0M
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby approves a preliminary
commitment of not more than $195,000 from CDGB funds, subject to execution of
an acceptable redevelopment project at the time of final rezoning.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
UPDATE GIVEN ON CARSON GIFT OF LAND. Mr.. Rosland recalled that the City was
recepient of a gift of land from Dr. and Mrs. Paul Carson, which property is
located east of Blake Road and south of Mirror Lakes Drive, in October of 1983.
The Carsons are now prepared to dedicate a second parcel to the...City for open
space. Mr. Rosland also advised that.he had met with Mrs. Jessie Bonn, 6005
Pine Grove Road, regarding her donation of property to the City. The parcel
has been surveyed and the City Attorney has been instructed to prepare the
deed. Mrs. Bonn has been told that the City would pay for an appraisal of the
land to be donated to the City. No action was taken.
HOMART REDEVELOPMENT OF FRANCE AVENUE THEATRE SITE /BLOOMINGTON DISCUSSED.
Mr. Hughes advised that he has received draft copies of an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Homart redevelopment of the France Avenue Drive -in Theatre
site in Bloomington and are available for the Council's review. A response has
not been received from the Bloomington City Council to Mayor Courtney's letter
requesting a joint meeting to discuss the impact of the proposed redevelopment.
6/17/85
Homart has expressed their - willingness to come to the next Edina City Council
meeting to explain their proposed project. In response to question of Member
Richards on input to the EIS, Mr. Hughes stated that an information meeting and
hearing on the EIS is scheduled for July 9, 1985 at which we can submit comments
to be incorporated into the final EIS which will be used by the Bloomington City
Council to help them make a decision on the project. Member Richards suggested
that any facts that can be heard about_ the project would be helpful in offering
constructive criticism and /or appropriate objection and urged that the Council
ask Homart to make a presentation. Mr. Hughes said he would arrange for Homart
to be at the July 1, 1985 Council Meeting. Mr. Hoffman advised that he has talked
with the County staff regarding their review of the EIS and they have been very
reluctant to comment on the it. He recommended that the Council adopt a resolution
requesting the County to review and comment on the EIS. Mr. Hughes commented that
the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Pollution Control Agency (PCA)
are the other governmental agencies that are involved. The PCA actually has a
permit. They can either approve or deny the project based on the size of the
parking lot, the amount of air pollution, etc. MNDOT is involved in commenting on
the EIS. Member Turner then moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION TO.HENNEPIN COUNTY BOARD
WHEREAS, Homart Development Company is proposing to redevelop the Mann Theatre site
in the City of Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, the proposed development_is adjacent to County Road 17 (France Avenue); and
WHEREAS, the proposed development is very intense by City of Edina standards; and
WHEREAS, the current improvement of the I- 494 /France interchange is underway; and
WHEREAS; the proposed project will have a major impact on the new interchange; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is aware that completion of the new interchange will
result in additional capacity for undeveloped properties near I- 494 /France Avenue;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is concerned over the traffic impact of the proposed
project on the county and state road systems;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council urges Hennepin County
to very rigorously review the Homart EIS as to trip distribution, capacity analysis
on County intersections and interchanges, and adequacy of base line date used to
develop the above information in traffic - analysis.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED COMMENDING RALPH LIEBER Member Turner commented that the fare-
well reception
June 27, 1985.
he is leaving
lution:
for Dr. Ralph Lieber, Superintendent of Schools, is to be held on
She suggested that a resolution of appreciation be, passed because
this community. Member Turner moved adoption of the following reso-
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Dr. Ralph R. Lieber has served Edina School District No. 273 and the Edina
community as Superintendent of Schools since October 1971, and
WHEREAS, he has during those years shown outstanding leadership and sincere dedi-
cation in promoting the Edina public schools, and
WHEREAS, he has shown his commitment to the community to all with whom he has had
contact, and
WHEREAS, the Edina Public Schools under his guidance have contributed significantly
to the quality of life in our City and have gained national recognition for
excellence;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City. Council, the City staff and the
residents of Edina hereby express their thanks.and appreciation to
DR. RALPH R. LIEBER
for his dedicated service in helping make the City of Edina an outstanding community
in which to learn, work and live.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PHAMPLET ON DOMESTIC ABUSE NOTED. Member Turner stated she was appreciative of the
efforts of Chief Swanson and the Police Department in implementing the informational
phamphlet on domestic abuse to be distributed to participants in domestic assault
calls.
STRATEGIC PLAN RECAP TO BE PREPARED. Mr. Rosland expressed his appreciation for the
Council's participation in the special meeting at 5 p.m: to review and discuss the
Strategic Plan for the City. He advised that he would prepare a draft memorandum
summarizing that discussion:
6/17/85
JOAN LONSBURY APPOINTED TO THE METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION.
Mr. Rosland announced that Joan D. Lonsbury, Edina, has been appointed to the Metro-
politan Parks and Open Space Commission and will be representing Council District F,
which includes St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, Robbinsdale, Edina, Richfield and
Bloomington.
CITY MANAGER'S VACATION NOTED. Mr. Rosland informed the Council Members that he will
be on vacation the first week in July and that Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager,
will be acting in his stead.
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 1 AT 5 P.M. Mr. Rosland suggested that
the Council hold a Special Meeting to review and discuss the City's Capital Plan.
It was informally agreed to meet on July 1, 1985 at 5 p.m. to review the Capital
Plan. Member Kelly commented she would be absent but would like the material sent
to her as soon as it was ready.
INDUCING RESOLUTION ADOPTED FOR EDINBOROUGH PROJECT. Mr. Hughes advised that in
conjunction with its approval of the Edinborough redevelopment contract on May 6,
1985 the City has tentatively agreed to authorize the issuance of revenue bonds to
finance the construction of the 202 -unit senior citizen building. To effect such
an issuance, the City Council must first adopt an inducing resolution which includes
a program for the development of the project and its financing. If the Council
adopts the resolution then the program and an application are submitted to the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for approval. The total bond issue as requested
is $18.5 million. These are revenue bonds and, therefore, are not backed by the
general funds of the City or the tax increments of the Southeast Edina Redevelop-
ment District. The City Attorney has advised that prior to the actual issuance,
the City can withdraw from participation and not issue the.bonds if it determines
that it is in the best interest of the City not to do.so, or should the City be
unable to reach agreement as to financing or as to the terms and conditions of any
of the documents required. Mr. Hughes noted that Henry Hyatt, the developer of
the senior citizen project, is present to answer questions. Member Richards asked
Mr. Hyatt to summarize the City's role in issuing the revenue bonds for the project.
Mr. Hyatt explained that essentially this is a housing revenue bond issue which is
not actually an industrial revenue bond issue and therefore there are no caps. The
City is not pledging any of its own resources or taking any risk. The risk is taken
by the FHA insurance which guarantees that if there are any defaults the insurance
will pay off the bondholders. This process has to be taken in order to get the
advantages of tax except financing which lowers the effective interest rate to
approximately ten percent for this issue which is below market rate. As implied
by revenue bonds, the rents from the various tenants provide the revenues to pay
off the bonds. The program is administered by a trustee selected by the City and
is a program that is the most popular form of financing rental housing in the
country today. It is used very extensively throughout the metro area. Bertha
Erickson reiterated her remarks made earlier in the meeting that she objected to
the project being called housing for the elderly as units at $90,000 applies to
only a small percentage of the elderly. There being no further comment, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A PROGRAM, AND GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO A DEVELOPMENT AND ITS FINANCING, UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF THE
PROGRAM TO THE MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY FOR REVIEW
AND APPROVAL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City - Council of the City of Edina Minnesota (the City), as
follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1. By the provisions of the Act, the City is authorized to plan, administer,
issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance
one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue
bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development.
1.2. The City has-developed a housing plan and, after holding a public hearing
thereon after notice published at least thirty days prior thereto, has adopted the
housing plan and submitted it for review to the Metropolitan Council and has
received its comments.
1.3. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a
loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Sub-
divisions 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program
setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the
Act, after a public hearing thereon, and upon approval by the Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency (the Agency), as provided by Section 462C.01 of the Act, on the
basis of.the considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the Act.
6/17/85
1.4. This Council has received a proposal that the Municipality finance a portion
or all of the cost of a proposed multifamily housing development under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the Act), consisting of the acquisition of land
from the East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
Foundation) and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental
facility containing approximately 203 housing units together with parking and other
functionally related and subordinate facilities (the Development), to be located
in the City at 7800 York Avenue. The developer and owner of the Development will
be a limited partnership to be formed (the Developer), whose general partner or
partners will be Partners for Senior Communities, an Illinois partnership, or
Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation, (Partners), or
one or more of the following partners or shareholders of Partners: Henry Hyatt,
Daniel Epstein, Sheldon Baskin, William De Woskin or Manuel Kramer.
1.5. The City has caused to be prepared a program with respect to the development
and its financing (the Program). At a public hearing, duly noticed and held on
June 17, 1985, in accordance with the Act and Section 103(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1954, as amended, on the proposal to undertake the Program and
finance the Development, all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an
opportunity to express their views with respect to the proposal to undertake the
Program and finance the.Development, and interested persons were given the opportu-
nity to submit wirtten comments to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
1.6. The Developer has requested that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or
more series pursuant to the authority of the Act in a maximum aggregate principal
amount of approximately $18,500,000, to finance all or a portion of the costs of
the Development, and to make the proceeds of the bonds available to the Developer
for the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development, subject to
agreement by the Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the
bonds.
1.7. The.City has been advised by the Developer that conventional commercial
financing is available to pay the capital costs of the Development only on a
limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that the scope of the Develop-
ment and the economic feasibility of operating the Development would be signifi-
cantly affected, but with the aid of municipal financing the Development can be
constructed as designed and its operation can be made more economically feasible.
1.8. This Council has been advised by representatives of the Developer and Dain
Bosworth Incorporated, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, that on the basis of information
available to them and their discussions with the Developer and potential purchasers
of tax - exempt bonds, the bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to
finance the Project.
1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible
for the payment of the principal of, or premium or interest on the bonds.
SECTION 2
2.1. On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it.
would be desirable for the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions
of the Act to finance the Development in the maximum aggregate principal amount
of approximately $18,500,000.
2.2. It is determined to proceed with the Development and its financing and
this Council hereby declares its present intent to have the City issue its
revenue bonds under the Act to finance the Development, provided that the Deve-
loper enters into an agreement with the Foundation to acquire the land for pur-
poses of constructing the Development. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however,
the adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obliga-
tion on the part of the City or its City Council to issue or to cause the issuance
of such revenue bonds.._ The City retains the right in its sole discretion to
withdraw from participation and accordingly not issue the bonds should the City
at any time prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest
of the City not to issue the bonds, or should the parties to the transaction be
unable to reach agreement as to the structuring of the financing or as to the
terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction. All
details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be
subject to review and approval of the Program by the Agency and may be subject
to such further conditions as the City may specify. The bonds, if issued, shall
not constitute.a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any
property of the City, except the revenues of the Development specifically pledge
to the payment thereof; and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite, in
substance that the.bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the
revenues of the Development and the property specifically pledged under the
revenue agreement to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the
City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory limitation.
2.3. The Program is hereby approved, and in accordance with Section 462C.04,
Subdivision 2 of the Act, the City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to
cause the Program to be submitted to the Agency for review and approval. The
City Manager, City Attorney, and other officers, employees and agents of the
City are hereby authorized and directed to provide the Agency with any preliminary
information needed for this purpose.
6/17/85
2.4. Pursuant to Subdivision 1 of Section 462C.07 of the Act, in the making of
the loan to finance acquisition, construction and equipment of the Project in the
issuance of the bonds or other obligations of the City, the City may exercise,
within its corporate limits, any of the powers the Agency may exercise under
Chapter 462A, Minnesota Statutes, without limitation under the provisions of
Chapter 475, Minnesota Statutes.
2.5. The Developer has agreed and it is hereby determined that any and all
direct and indirect costs incurred by the City in connection with the Program
and the Development, whether or not the Development is carried to completion,
whether or not the Program is approved by the Agency, and whether or not the
City by resolution authorizes the issuance of the bonds, will be paid by the
Developer upon request.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 17th day of
June, 1986.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Bredesen and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same: None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed by
the Mayor and attested by the City Clerk.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment of
the following claims dated 6/17/85: General Fund $408,244.05, Working Capital
Fund $600.00, Park Fund $20.21, Art Center $2,351.78, Swimming Pool Fund $3,550.65,
Golf Course Fund $53,944.50, Recreation Center Fund $5,344.33, Gun Range Fund
$319.39, Water Fund $118.50, Utility Fund $221,189.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$115,766.97, - Construction Fund $49,214.73, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $207,675.00,
Total $1,068,339.25; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 5/31/85:
General Fund $196,840.87, Art Center $386.09, Swimming Pool Fund $66.26, Golf
Course Fund $8,199.49, Recreation Center Fund $3,465.72, Gun Range Fund $75.61,
Utility Fund $2,590.89, Liquor Dispensary Fund $304,350.10, Total $515,975.03.
There being no further business appearing on the Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared
the meeting adjoined at 10:00 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 17, 1985
5:00 P.M.
In attendance were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
CITY'S STRATEGIC PLAN REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland stated that this special meeting
was scheduled so that the Council could review the City's Strategic Plan
which had been developed in 1984. The Mission Statement was reviewed and no
changes were suggested. Key Issues were reviewed and discussed. Also reviewed
were the Goals and Long -term Objectives that had been developed. Lastly, the
Council looked at.the Short -Term Objectives. After considerable discussion,
it was agreed that the following should be the Short -Term Objectives for the
remainder of 1985: 1) Paramedic Services, 2) Capital Plan, and 3) Upgrading
of the Comprehensive Plan.
Because the purpose of this special meeting was to review and discuss the
Strategic Plan, no formal action was taken.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
City Clerk
is
4-MILIJAW-7.
WAR DWE
LEWIS P. F
Off
--NIL
U
4
jk
Ir
a%I
71
7,4 7
4
NUMBER Z-84-4 Brutger Co.
T,.
L 0 C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
REQUEST
EDINA- PLANNING DEPARTMENT
;v.
REZONg
,a,z
NUMBER Z-84-4 Brutger Co.
T,.
L 0 C A T 10 N Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill Road
REQUEST
EDINA- PLANNING DEPARTMENT
� 1
M E M.O R A N D U M
DATE: July 12, 1985
TO: Ken Rosland City Planner
FROM: Craig Larsen City Planner
SUBJECT: Z -84 -4 - Brutger Companies R- 1 -PRD -3
The subject proposal was heard by the Planning Commission at
it"sJune 26, 1985 meeting. Prior to that meeting, on June 24,
representatives of Brutger Companies met with representatives
of Dewey Hill and Windwood Condominiums to consider changes to
the landscape plan. The attached, revised plan was considered
by the Planning Commission which recommended approval on a
4 - 3 vote.
I have attached, for your review, a petition by residents of
Dewey stating their opposition to the development, and a
letter from the president of Windwoods Condominium
Association approving the revised landscape plan.
r i
MU"'ITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
_gDNESDAY JUNE 26, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M.
EDI •TY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS`_ DING:
Chairmd 1 Lewis, John Bail,4 en McCelland,
David Run '.John Skagerber :``i'Palmer and
Virginia Sha
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Len Ring, Del John
STAFF ATTENDING:
don Johnson and Phil Sked
Craig, Larsen�C.` Planner'0.!
Fran Hoffm,.- lity Engineer
Jackie H kker, Secretary ',*1.4,
�`..
.9
I. Approv the Minutes: May 29, 1
Jo- almer moved for approval of the sites noting
the fo ing change: Page 3, paragraph 2, 5 should
read-, r. Wilson indicated that Brutger wou in
bui, g by Windwood and develop 8 units, some hich
wo be models. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All
w in favor; the motion carried. The minutes were
approved.
II. Old Business
Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies R -1 to PRD -3
S -85 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval
Foster Green Addition
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey
Hill Road
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City
Council, at its June 17, 1985 meeting, referred the subject
proposal back to the Commission. The purpose of the
referral was to consider modifications to the landscaping
plan following meetings with the residents of the Windwoods
and Dewey Hill Condominiums. Mr. Larsen added that Brutger
representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood
Condominiums and Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday June 24,
1985 to develop and modify a landscaping plan to present to
the Commission. A new plan was developed resulting in the
following changes:
Page 2
Old New
30 2,1/2" Hardwoods 16 2 1/2" hardwoods plus
13 4" hardwoods
39 4" Locust Trees remain the same
49 6' Spruce 57 12' Spruce plus
15 6' Spruce
47 Crabapple Trees 50 Crabapple Trees
The emphasis is on perimeter screening.
Mr. Larsen introduced Mr. Steve Wilson representing
Brutger and informed the Commission that they would answer
any questions the Commission or public may have.
Mr. Wilson addressed the Commission, thanking them fore
their previous approval of the Final Development Plan he
presented to them on May 29, 1985. He informed the
Commission that his meeting with residents of Dewey Hill and
Windwoods Condominiums led him to believe that additional
screening was called for. Mr. Wilson stated his previous
plan had 2 1/2 times the minimum standard number of trees
the City of Edina Ordinance calls for. The new plan has 3
times the required number of trees. Mr. Wilson added the
reason he was before the Commission again is because the
City Council sent the request for Zoning change and
preliminary plat approval back to the Planning Commission
and staff for review of the landscape plan to determine
whether or not it is consistent with adjoining properties
and to provide an opportunity for the neighbors to offer
their comments.
A discussion ensued with members of Dewey Hill,(those
who voiced their concerns are as follows; Mr. Jack Forcia,
Mr. Joe Gust, Mr. Robert Koch, Doris Prior, Florence Norback
and Melvin Gittleman). Representatives of Dewey Hill
presented the Commission with a signed petition expressing
their opposition to the proposed plans presented by Brutger.
A number of concerns were noted: The members question
whether the proposed Development was seriously considered
with the neighborhood in mind. There is a general feeling
among residents of Dewey Hill that the Brutger Development
does not belong in a area which has a park like atmosphere
consisting of 3 story buildings. The proposed Development
of cluster like homes would be out of context with the
neighborhood; the residents of Dewey Hill did meet with Mr.
Wilson to discuss changes in the landscaping plan but
residents were not able to review the plans prior to the
meeting.
Mr. Skagerberg and Mr. Runyan clarified that the
overall building concept has been approved earlier by the
0
Page 3
Commission. What the Commission is considering at this
meeting is the revised landscaping plan without regard to
the buildings.
Mr. Wilson submitted to the Commission a letter from
residents of The Windwoods stating they were satisfied with
the revised landscaping plan.
It is noted in the minutes that general confusion
occurred regarding the purpose of the Commission Meeting.
The residents of Dewey Hill were present to address the
overall building concept of the proposed development and
landscaping plan. The Commission was present to vote on
approval of the revised landscaping plan.
Mt. John Palmer moved for approval of the landscaping
plan. Mr. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. Upon roll
call vote Commission members voted as follows:
Mr. William Lewis - Nay
Mr. John Bailey - Nay
Mrs. Helen McClelland - Nay
Mrs. Virginia Shaw - Aye
Mr. John Palmer - Aye
Mr. John Skagerberg -Aye
Mr. David Runyan -Aye
The motion carried. 4 to 3 vote.
5 -2 Interlachen Height,
Generally Locate routh of Ridge
Road and north of
Interlachen
Mr. Larsen ed ommission that a preliminary
plat for this prop proved by the Commission on
February 27, 1985 an ved by the City Council on April
1, 1985. Since that property has been acquired by
a new developer Cra n er's. The new developer has
submitted the att revise liminary plat.
Mr. Larse nted out that roposed changes to the
plat effect o he area south of lachen Boulevard.
The two lot Ridge Road and all of'- rea north of
Interlache ain the same as in the pl ven an earlier
approval. a revised plat reduces by 3 t mber of lots
and eli es the extension of Green Farms to
Interl n. The new lots would all front on lachen
and w range in size from 30,302 to 45, 956 s' feet
in a The lots in the approved plat ranged from 00
to 30, 00 square feet in area.
T
TO: Edina Planning Department
Edina Planning Commission
Edina City Council
FROM: Windwood Condominium Association
RE: Brutger Companies, Inc. Proposed Clustered Condominium Development
at 7400 Cahill Road
Our association has had the opportunity to meet with Steve Wilson, a repre -.
sentative of Brutger Companies, to discuss the referenced development. We
have reviewed the landscape plan dated June 26, 1985 and find it acceptable.
David Kohner, President
Windwood Homeowners Association
Date��
r
a
June 26, 1985
' TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we, the following residents of
Dewey Hill East (5501 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would recommend that a single structure consisting of approximately forty
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the open space for the entire area and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
NAME UNIT NO.
3Z --
N.P.RIf7JJ�AWZA A
TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
June 26, 1985
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we, the following residents of
Dewey Hill West (5601 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would recommend that a single structure consisting of approximately forty
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the open space for the entire area and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
NAME
CZr--
�r
,
UNIT NO.
Jd?
r
li
ll�
-31 3
1Z-/v
Z�S`
TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
June 26, 1985
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we the following residents of
Dewey Hill West (5601 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would recommend that a single structure consisting of approximately forty
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the open space for the entire area and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
NAME
Cw�m...-
X67
IL
b .'2—
Sy
�L.1 le
//0
//0
/01 UNIT NO.
rot
�1Z
M
June 26, 1985
TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we the following residents of
Dewey Hill West (5601 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would recommend that a single structure consisting of approximately forty
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the open space for the entire area and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
NAME
UNIT NO.
301
r
TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.AND PLANNING COMMISSION
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we, the following residents of
Dewey Hill East (5501 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would— recommend -that a- single structure- considting -of - approximately forty- -
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the open space for the entire area and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
NAME UNIT NO.
X ���
TO: THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND PLANNING COMMISSION:
June 26; 1985
Because we believe the proposed building plans for the property between the
Dewey Hill Condominiums and the Windwood Condominiums to be out of scale and too
high a density as compared with our property, we, the following residents of
Dewey Hill East (5501 Dewey Hill Road) respectfully request that the site plan
be revised.
We would recommend that a single structure consisting of approximately forty
dwelling units with underground garages be considered.
This would maximize the .open space for the entire area,and be in keeping with
adjacent properties.
0
NAME
UNIT NO.
C"; ,
Z 3
X37
as 8'
X33
a3a
ado
z 3 ��
WHEREAS, the Edina Midgets completed a successful season with a record of 34 wins,
4 sses and 4 ties; and
WHE�AS, the Edicia Midgets was the runner -up team in the International "Sil l Stick
TQurn ent at Sarnia, Ontario, being the first time an American team wen to the
finals; and
WHEREAS, uccess has come to the members of the team because of thei extraordinary
ability, h urs of practice, and leadership of their coaches; and
WHEREAS, as epresentatives of the City of Edina, the members of a team exemplified
the highest s ndards of athletic proficiency and good sportsm ship;
NOW, THEREFORE, E IT RESOLVED by the. City Council of the Cit of Edina, on behalf
of the citizenry s a whole, that the Edina Midget White A,Peckey Team be publicly
commended for thei outstanding accomplishments; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLV that a copy of this resolution b. entered into the Minutes
Book of the City Counc3+ and that copies be presented,4o the members of the team:
Sean Collins, Matt Crow. , Kirk Dulac, Doug Evenson„ Mark Feese, Jim Genung, Ted
Hoffman, Erik Johnson, Sea Kearney, Pat McCarth/GeTung ohn McCoy, Rob Morris, Doug
Mostrom, Peter Perry, Dan Pe rson, Jim Turner aodd Willson, to Coaches Hal
Tearse and John Turner and to . am Managers Ja and Jerry Kearney.
ADOPTED this 1st day of April, 1 5.
Copies of the resolution were then resente "personally to the team captains and
each member of the team who was pres t a ' to the coaches. Member Turner commented
that this was an exceptional fine group f young men who are a credit to Edina on .
and off the ice and that they and the p rents join in thanking the Edina Hockey
Association and Mr. Kojetin and his aff irn%naking these programs possible.
MARK BERNHARDSON COMMENDED FOR OVSTANDING JOB A ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER. Mr. Rosland
advised that Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Mana \areoud s tendered his resignation
and has accepted the positio Xf City Administratoono, Minnesota. He recalled
that Mr. Bernhardson came tthe City in.July of 1has been his assistant
since he was appointed a '6ity Manager in October ear. Mr. Rosland stated
that Mr. Bernhardson ha�'`been a very helpful and sss tant Manager, and that
although the City sta was sorry to see him go,:tare oud of his accomplish-
ments and thank him or his dedicated s ervice to t. Mr. osland presented
him with a silver "en bearing the City logo and wim well i his new position.
On behalf of th Council, Mayor Courtney expressed regrets in is leaving and
also extende eir wishes for success in the futu
MINUTES o the Special Meeting of March 11 and Regular Meeting of March 18,.1985,
were ap oved as submitted by motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turn
Aye . Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
M ion carried.
PRD -3 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ZONING FOR BRUTGER COMPANIES PROPERTY GRANTED
ll 6 FIRST READING (ORDINANCE N0. 825 -A3). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting
,1' Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Craig Larsen, Planner, recalled
that the public hearing on the Zoning Change from-R-1 to PRD -3 for the Brutger
Companies property, generally located west of Cahill Road and south of Dewey Hill
Road, had been continued from the Council Meeting of March 18, 1985. The request
for rezoning had been heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission
on January 2 and January 30, 1985. The site is abutted by Dewey Hill Condominiums
on the north and west and by Windwood Condominiums directly to the south. Mr. Larsen
stated that according to the City's Comprehensive Plan of 1980 the site is desig-
nated as suitable for medium density residential and this is in the range of 6 to
12 dwelling units per acre. The proponent, Brutger Companies, is requesting a
rezoning from the existing R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3 Planned Resi-
dential District and have submitted a site plan illustrating 26 townhouse units and
24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven individual buildings.
Each individual building would contain either 4, 6 or 8 units. This would result
in an overall density for the site of 9.73 dwelling units per acre on the 5.14 acre
4/1/85
site. The plan proposes to mix traditional townhouse style of units (living space
for one family on two different floors) with a condominium style unit where all
i the living space will be on one floor. Individual units, whether townhouse or
condominium, will contain between 1,100 and 1,400 square feet of living area. The
townhouse units will provide two enclosed parking spaces per unit and the condo-
minium units will provide parking at a ratio of 1.5 enclosed spaces per unit. All
garages proposed by the site plan are attached. In addition to the surface parking
spaces that would be provided in front of each garage stall, there are 24 surface
parking spaces scattered thoughout the site. All buildings are 2 -story in design
and the exterior treatment would be brick and cedar siding with asphalt shingles.
Mr. Larsen advised that the staff report of January 30 recommended approval of the
project. However, by a 6 to 3 vote the Planning Commission recommended denial of
the proposed plan. He noted that Steve Wilson of the Brutger Companies was present
to explain the proposed project further. Mr. Wilson stated that the Brutger Com-
panies is a development corporation specializing in multi - family housing. He then
outlined some of the steps they had taken in the selection of this type of project
as the best and highest use for the subject property. He pointed out that the
City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Housing Element, identifies a second theme as
the development of policies and programs that will widen the range of housing choices
available in the City and to offer a wide range of market rate residential housing
choices. Mr. Wilson stated that they had worked closely with City staff to meet
the goal under the Plan's Land Use Element of encouraging excellence in site plan-
ing, building materials and design. The Plan also states that vacant lands in the
Cahill and 70th Street area are generally characterized by severe environmental
limitations such as slopes or poor soils and multiple residential or clustered
\ housing presents the most logical means of land utilization. Mr. Wilson pointed
out that the proposed project uses the cluster housing concept to utilize the
existing topography. They also looked at the City's 1980 Land Use Plan which shows
two primary areas within the City that have a medium density land use designation.
.Within those areas they had found a mixture of apartments, townhouses and condo -
miums projects which had been constructed and had selected the clustered housing
concept which has been well received in the housing market. Mr. Wilson added that
they had considered the requirements established by the Zoning Ordinance as to
density and setbacks and that the proposed project is well within those guidelines.
In summary he stated that the project will be highly marketable, that it is a
quality product and will have amenities that are appealing to the people who are
going to buy the units. Tom Hunt, Carlson.Mjorud Architecture, architect for the
project, then outlined the architectural elements of the project: 1) exterior to
be of brick and cedar, compatible with the surrounding area, 2) buildings would be
sited to create a park -like setting, 3) the footprint of the buildings would pro-
vide interest by use of jogs, 4) the buildings would have an animated roofscape,
and 5) landscaping would include flowering trees /shrubs to add color and interest,
with the vegetation to interface with surrounding property. Mr. Wilson then
responded to general questions from the audience. He clarified that the units
will be owner occupied, not rental, and will be designed for several types of
marketing; that the one - level, first floor units will be geared primarily for the
elderly, the-one-level, second floor units would.appeal to the young professionals,
and the 2 -story townhouse units would appeal to the young professional couples but
will not necessarily be geared to families; and that the questions of pets would
be a decision to be made by the association which will be formed. He added that
the setbacks requirements are 20 foot sideyard, 35 foot rear yard and 35 foot front
yard. Buildings will be sited at angles to eliminate a tunnel look. City ordi-
nance requires that garbage cans must be in an enclosure or building and will not
be seen from surrounding properties. The units are proposed to be priced from a
minimum of $95,000/100,000 to a maximum of $135,000/140,000. Bob Gunderson,
6550 York Avenue, addressed some of the issues that were raised at the Planning
Commission meeting with regard to density, integrity of neighborhood, quality of
structure, design and landscaping. In summary, he stated that the site has unique
possibilities and that the proposed development was designed for this particular
site to meet the demand and needs of people who are looking to shift residences or
move into Edina; that the proposed project responds to the Comprehensive Plan,
meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements and follows the precedent established by
other approved developments in Edina. Mr. Wilson then responded to general ques-
tions of the Council regarding comparision of price range of the proposed units
with adjacent properties, exterior materials, windows, and lot coverage. Melvin
Gittleman stated he was the developer of Dewey Hill Condomiums, East and West and
of the proposed South building. He stated that he objected to the proposed develop-
ment for these reasons: 1) the development will be out of scale to the surround-
ing area because the site has existing three -story buildings on three sides,
2) the density is too high, 3) lot coverage not compatible with adjacent develop-
ments. Dave Kohner, President of Windwood Homeowners Association, advised that
30% of the members of the Association are opposed to the proposed development and
that at its February meeting Windwood's Board of Directors had voted unanimously
_j 1j JD
to gc on record in opposition. He summarized the concerns of the Windwood resi-
dents as follows: 1) the ratio of "covered" land to green area is too high,
2) increased traffic in the area, 3) detrimental effect to Windwood residents by
addition of a two -story structure so close to the property line, 4) development
would not be in keeping with "flavor" of neighborhood, and 5) concern for wildlife
of the area. Also speaking in opposition to the proposed development were
Alvyn Pope, 5601 Dewey Hill Road #210- Harley Peet, 5501 Dewey Hill Road #324;
William Harrison, 7510 Cahill Road, and Albert Levin, 5501 Dewey Hill Road. No
further comment being heard, Member Turner moved First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A3
as follows, subject to the following conditions: 1) final zoning is conditioned on
final plat, 2) developer's agreement, 3) subdivision dedication, and 4) approval
of landscaping plan. Member Turner, stated she supported the rezoning because it
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan both in terms of widening the range, of
housing choices and the medium density land use designation and that it meets
the requirements of PRD -3 zoning, She pointed out two concerns that should be
addressed before Second Reading: 1) landscaping to protect surrounding properties
and 2) concern for increased traffic. Motion for granting First Reading was
seconded by Member Kelly. Member Richards stated he would support the motion if
the proposed development were reduced in density not to exceed 44 units total for
the site. Member Bredesen commented that he would support an effort to reduce
the density to 44 units but that his biggest concern was that a landscaping plan
should be submitted that would show mature plantings and a heavily landscaped site.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
First Reading granted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (N0 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT _(PRD -3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 or Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District.,;( Sub- District PRD -3) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet „pf the North 30 acres of the
NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, according to the -U'.S. Government Survey.”
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in -full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
PSR- 4_�'LAXNED SENIOR RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING FOR WOODHAVEN GRANTED FIRST READ-
ING (ORDINA1XE--NQ -. 825 -A4). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk,
approved and ordere`- NAcepd orv,14ile. Gordon Hughes, City Planner, presented the
request for zoning change m R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR -4 Planned
Senior Residence District.or csgdiaven, generally located south of Interlachen
Boulevard, west of Summit Avenue an rth of Vernon Avenue. The subject property
-
measures 32,500 square,feet in area and composed of three developed single
family lots. He recalled that Council had a oved a rezoning to PRD -3 District
for this property O' March 19, 1984, for continu 'on of a townhouse project that
had started at the corner of Summit Avenue and Inter en Blvd. Five of the units
were constructed and a rezoning was approved for 8 more u s to be constructed on
the subject property. This project did not receive a final p approval although
it was rezoned and construction has not and apparently will not c ence. Mr.,Hughes
stated that the property has now been optioned by Westminster Corpor don for the
purpose of constructing a senior citizen residence. Westminster, who opexates under
the auspices of the Catholic Archdioseses of Minneapolis /St. Paul, is working with a
group of Edina churches who will be the sponsoring entity of this project. It will
be funded by the HUD 202 Program and the project will be identical to South Haven
o•h� r� ... c rnnnntl.• .....,crr.,rrna .,r Purl -1 �•. --, �...� �'..r�- .1.•nn+,nc TF tl-,n rirninr•r rnr•n -..nc
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 29, 1985
Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -3, Planned Residential District
S 785 -5 Foster Green Addition
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of Dewey Hill Road
Refer to: Attached Final Development plans and Preliminary Plat
A preliminary development plan was considered and approved by the City Council
on April 1, 1985.
The proponents have now submitted an overall development plan in support of their
request for final zoning approval. A preliminary plat for the property has also
been submitted. The overall development plan includes a site plan, grading plan,
preliminary utility layout, elevations, landscaping plan and schedule as required
by Ordinance.
At the time of preliminary approval, members of the Council stated that the
landscaping plan should provide screening for surrounding properties and that
the plan include mature stock in greater than minimum numbers. The Zoning
Ordinance requirement for this site is 50 overstory trees and a full compliment
of understory trees and shrubs. Overstory trees must be 22 inches in diameter
for deciduous trees and 6 feet in height for coniferous trees. The proponents
have submitted a landscape plan and schedule which illustrate a total of 118
overstory trees, 39 of which exceed minimum Ordinance requirements. The plan
also includes 47 understory trees and a variety of shrubs.
Exterior elevations show brick and cedar siding with asphalt roofing. Most
ground floor wall areas would be brick with dormers and second floor walls of
cedar siding.
Recommendation:
The proponents have submitted plans which conform to Ordinance requirements and
which respond to concerns raised at preliminary approval. The landscape plan,
although not as lavish as Dewey Hill, is significantly above Zoning Ordinance
minimums. The plan gives attention to perimeter screening as well as providing
a well landscaped site. The plan does rely on existing material along the
northerly boundary. Staff recommends final zoning and preliminary plat
approval, conditioned on the following:
I. Final platting
2. Subdivision dedication
3. Developers agreement
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION .
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 30, 1985
Z -84 -4 Brutger Companies
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
PRD -3, Planned Residential District
Generally located: West of Cahill Road and South of
Dewey Hill Road
Refer to: Attached plans
The subject request was heard by the Commission at its
January 2, 1985, meeting. the request was tabled pending
submission of revised plans by the developer.
The proponent has returned with a site plan
illustrating 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units on
the 5.14 acre site. There are seven building's containing
between four and eight units. Townhouse and condominium
units are mixed in all but the four -unit building which is
all townhouses. The proposal complies with all requirements
of the PRD -3 district.
The revised site plan differs significantly from the
initial submital. Total unit count has been reduced from 60
to 50 which reduces the density to 9.73 dwelling units per
acre. Building coverage which was 29.2 percent has been
reduced to 21.25 percent. Enclosed parking is provided at
a ratio of two per townhouse and 1.5 per condominium unit.
The plan also illustrates 24 surface parking spaces. The
proposed floor plans exceed zoning ordinance size minimums
for two and three bedroom units.
The exterior treatment of brick with lap siding remains
from the original proposal. However, all units are now
proposed at two stories. Units with tuck -under garages are
no longer proposed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff believes that the proponents have submitted a
plan that responds well to our criticism of the original
plan. 'The crowding of the site, which was our main
criticism of the first plan, has been greatly reduced. The
new plan provides improved spacing between buildings and
allows a more open feeling for the project. The new site
plan also reduces the amount of black top on the site,
provides guest parking throughout the site, and improves
site access for emergency vehicles.
Staff recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to
PRD -3 with the following conditions:
1. Final zoning is conditioned on final plat.
2. Developer's agreement.
3. Subdivision dedication.
0'G
OL
f;
r
:n �:Q
Rio
;i
Ii
_J
S
�-1
U
,�
�i
��
��,
J..^
_J
L
Q
� ',
�ti � �i
� i
-1 j
� ` `, ..,.
FOR
(';� : , y r I eouNOaBRUTGER TOPOGRAPHIC COMPANY,, INC.
�y.r -- fi
l_
- --' --- -- ---------
---- --� - � 4• �. - w, - i `� .. it '�` 'p ..,.. „..:I.
I
e
❑ .
-
- --= ----- - -- - --
�—BITUMINoUS SURFACES
_�'".�-
t� i �
=i
r. c. •
c, c
'F
-r
:�
_t '
J
t '
'I
`a 1r. T� +' - 9 ,:3� i. 1•kL• .�,,` i. ? c;x,�)a¢r..Qa .3r.. n=; :a k -Y��'- �. ?.;Y- :�fx� o� }S .4. P�':t .5
n .
��_■m �► _,o alloy, Ilion! — EIRE
` _■ / n . r■�i a F1/ ■ =p3 �� ■�■ �■ ��A— ■/ ■ ■7�■ ■/■ ■■ C
etF
Q .(2
CAHILL,'
........ . .
.:ROAD
..........
0
A
0
r
� =a
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Brutger Rezoning
Dear Mayor Courtney:
As you are aware, the above matter is on the agenda
for Monday, July 15th. It is my understanding that this matter
has been heard by the Planning Commission and the Council and
the first approval given for the project.
It then went back to the Planning Commission for final
approval on plans and landscaping and screening and similar matters
and was then formally referred to the Council. At the Council meeting
of June 17, 1985, it was referred back to the Planning Commission for
review of the landscaping and screening diagram and with the further
request that the developers meet with the Homeowners Association at
Windwood and Dewey Hill (Mr. Gittelman's project).
Mr. Wilson of the Brutger Companies met with the people at
Windwood and has a letter which he has presented to Craig Larson
indicating their approval of the landscaping plan.
He then met with the people from Dewey Hill and they were
more interested in talking about the basic concept and other matters
and did not really get into the landscaping. Mr. Wilson has again
called them and asked for a meeting, and at this time it was apparently
impossible to work out a time when they were available.
THOMSEN, NYBECK,JOHNSON, BOUQUET 6 VAN VALKENBURG, P.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 102 -7250 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS IEDINAI,MINNESOTA 53435
GLENN G. NYBECK
- 16121 835 -7000
OF COUNSEL
GORDON V.JOHNSON
JOHN K. BOUQUET
HELGE THOMSEN
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
RICHARD D.WILSON,P.A.
MARK G. OHNSTAD
JACK W. CARLSON
DONALD D. SMITH
ROBERT E. 2ECK
DENNIS M. PATRICK
MARSH J. HALBERG
July 11, 1985
MARK E. LASEE
JOHN R. PRAETORIUS
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Brutger Rezoning
Dear Mayor Courtney:
As you are aware, the above matter is on the agenda
for Monday, July 15th. It is my understanding that this matter
has been heard by the Planning Commission and the Council and
the first approval given for the project.
It then went back to the Planning Commission for final
approval on plans and landscaping and screening and similar matters
and was then formally referred to the Council. At the Council meeting
of June 17, 1985, it was referred back to the Planning Commission for
review of the landscaping and screening diagram and with the further
request that the developers meet with the Homeowners Association at
Windwood and Dewey Hill (Mr. Gittelman's project).
Mr. Wilson of the Brutger Companies met with the people at
Windwood and has a letter which he has presented to Craig Larson
indicating their approval of the landscaping plan.
He then met with the people from Dewey Hill and they were
more interested in talking about the basic concept and other matters
and did not really get into the landscaping. Mr. Wilson has again
called them and asked for a meeting, and at this time it was apparently
impossible to work out a time when they were available.
,, I AW
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney -2- July 11, 1985
Mr. Gunderson will be presenting this matter to the City
Council on July 15th.
It is my understanding from the new drawing regarding the
landscapinq that the plan now is to meet the same standards that
Mr. Gittelman has on his project and in fact to extend that so
that the effect will be to have approximately 250 to 300% of the
covering required by the Ordinance. As I indicated to you, these
appear to be substantial in that some of them are as high as 12
feet and some have diameters in excess of 4 inches. Thus we
are not talking about just small plantings.
Since the firs- approval given by the Planning Commission
and the City Council, the Brutger people have continued to work on
this project in reliance upon those decisions. They have continued
to have their architect work on the drawings; have arranged for a
market consultant and sales agent and marketing company; have
employed people to help in setting up a program of transition from
the developers to the owners; have met with lenders; have expended
funds on this landscaping matter; have continued to prepare condo-
minium documents; and have continued to expend funds in the final
development plan.
This plan has met opposition from the neighbors, and in
particular the people at the Dewey Hill condominium. They are
concerned that this is a different format then their facilities.
This has been designed to create a different impression other
than the large mass building; has had its density reduced at the
request of the neighbors and of the City people; has taken into
account the requirements of police and fire in its design and
arrangement; it has attempted to be designed in a manner that is
compatible with the neighborhood without being the same. I might
state parenthetically that if the large mass units are so accept-
able I am surprised that Mr. Gittelman' has not proceeded with his
third building which has been authorized.
l
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney -2-
July 11, 1985
Another factor here is that we are talking about properties
that will ultimately sell for something in the $90,000/100,000 range
and of course, that is another segment of the society that we are trying
to get into Edina, or keep in Edina. This is not subsidized; this is
not low and moderate income; this is a design that is aimed at home
ownership by these people and I think will be a welcome addition to the
area.
It is our hope that the discussion at the July 15th
meeting can be limited to the question as. to compliance with the
landscaping requirements, but obviously if the discussion is not
so limited, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Gunderson will be available to answer
any and all questions.
JVV:jd
cc: Council Members
Ken Rosland
Craig Larson.
Yo Y10
a Van Valkenbur
MACK WOLF
ONE APPLE TREE SQUARE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55420
July 12, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Minneapolis, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney,
The writer, who is the owner of apartment 306 in the build-
ing known as 5601 Dewey Hill Road, wishes to oppose the
development of the Foster Green property adjacent to 5601
and 5605 Dewey Hill Road.
Parking is limited to ground level. Both Dewey Hill and
Windwood have underground parking in addition to ground
level areas designated for parking; but would add to the
congested appearance of this development.
The entire concept, in my opinion, is incompatible with the
character of the entire Dewey Hill area of Edina. This
entire area has a spacious appearance with wooded areas,
walking paths, etc. We would also hope that the project be
re- designed to insure that the egress and ingress to Cahill
Road not create a traffic hazard.
Sincerely,
a Alt *' �' -
MW /cab
r ;
July 12, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Foster Green Property -
Brutger Construction
Dear Mayor Courtney:
I am a resident of Dewey Hill East and have appeared at several
City Council meetings in attempting to stop the development of the town
homes to be developed next to our building on Cahill Road. I would like to
with this letter put in my final protest to the project.
I realize that the developer has complied with all of the laws
outlined by the City of Edina; however, in my mind I feel that just by
complying with the laws is not always the qualifications that should be
the determining factor. In the two Council meetings I attended, there were
probably in excess of 150 people in attendance and petitions signed by even
more names requesting the Council to not approve the project. The only
people for the project were those to benefit financially, i.e. the developer
and the owner of the land who plans to sell it. It seems to me in a
democratic system that the Council should take into consideration all of
the people protesting this project in comparison to virtually no one in favor
of it and vote accordingly. If the project is not passed by the City Council,
the only ones to be affected are Foster Green - -who can sell his property to
Gittleman Construction I am sure for the same price; therefore, he will not
be financially hurt - -and the developer Brutger Construction who, I am sure,
can in another parcel of land to develop.
r..,
urge you to not pass this development and allow the property to
be sold to Gittleman for his development which will be much more in keeping
with the area. Thank you for your consideration.
X Sinc ely y urs,
I
"Harley Peet
5501 De y Hill Road
Edina, MN 55435
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eaton Place
Edina, Mn. 55424
Ms. Peggy Kelly
22 Circle West
Edina,. Mn. 55424
Mr. Charles Bredesen
4506 Sunnyside Rd.
Edina, Mn. 55424
Mr. Fred Richards
7225 FZee twood Dr.
Edina,Mn. 55435
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
5601 Dewey Hill Rd.
Edina, Mn. 55435
July 11, 1385
Ms. Leslie Turner
6701 Parkwood Lane
Edina, Mn. 55436
y -A-
This letter shall be short and to the point as I know you are very busy
people with personal and professional lives as well as your duties on
the Edina City Council.
My purpose is to state that I object to the proposed Brutger Development
on Cahill Road adjacent to Dewey Hill East and to ask you to consider the
views of the neighbors adjacent to the proposed site. In discussions with
many of my neighbors, all mature and considerate people, I find unanimous
objection to the specific proposal being considered by you at your meeting
scheduled for July 15.
Rather than give you lengthy specifics con the proposal, let me implore
you to consider, "Why are the neighbors objecting to this development ?"
An answer to that question based upon your research, data previously
supplied to you and in consideration of the maturity, experience and
conservative nature of my neighbors will, I believe, result in a sound
decision. The Brutger proposal, in my opinion, is totally in conflict
with the surrounding homes, i.e., a townhouse development impinging.- -upon
the previously developed adjacent properties.
At risk of being redundant, the residents of Dewey Hill condominiums
are mature, thoughtful, experienced and I would guess, conservative
people. They enjoy their homes and wish to maintain them at a high
standard. I am requesting you to consider our views as neighbors of
the proposed development. We all made a conscious choice to live here
and intend to for many years. ( Brutger personnel, I presume, will not
be living here. ) I know a development of some kind will eventually
be constructed here. "Our hope is that it will be compatible with the
pattern of the area and add to the aesthetics of the neighborhood
which we, at present, find very beautiful and comfortable.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
?PP. ady
d�zs. Pawunaz
.5501 2�ewey C{i(t 'Road
C�-ELM nt 326
Edina., Ainnesota 55435
N. CU e.
"--k- ��- �-.-�- - 69 0--pv%.
� , L YL4_
a
� V
.Cdr
/ - .
oll
As
17
- G
1 J
Yn�
July 11, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424
Dear Sir:
This letter is in regard to the Foster Green property on Cahill Road now under rezoning
consideration. Mrs. Koch and I are concerned with several areas of the proposed Town
House development. We do realize; however, that the builder's specifications meet with
City requirements, but we don't think they meet with the landscaping scheme of the Edina
Dewey Hill Area.
We recently left Minnetonka to move to a smaller facility that offered an adult building,
location convenience and an outdoor scene that was park like and well groomed similar to
what we were used to. We looked to Edina first because of the reputation of the city, and
we have been well satisfied until now. We could have purchased equal space in other areas
but settled on Dewey Hill as having the features that meet our needs.
A condominium is different from a house in that it has windows facing in one direction
o nly. Anything that is south of our building is really our front yard. According to the
building plans, the back yards of the proposed town houses would essentially be in our front
yard = The residents of that cm Alex will undoubetedly be like other normal people an d have
grills, bicycles, pets and the numerous other items people keep in their back yards. .
In our present front yard we have attractive landscaping, fountains, a small brook and a
pool. We also have a Bar -B -Q grill but it is well screened by trees and shrubery.
We would like to suggest that in addition to some large trees to help shield the new town
h ouse roofs and back yards that an attractive fence similar to the one.at Dewey Hill 111 on
78th Street be installed to protect both areas and also keep the landscaping scheme ocampatable
w ith neighboring Edina residences.
Respectfully,
b�e Aned Ko h
5501 Dewey Hill Road
511, h
July 10, 1985
Dear Council Member:
We are interested in the development of the Foster Green property.
However, we are onnosed to the pro+ nosed development because it is not
compatible with,the surrounding areas in the following ways: -
1) The building density is strongly incons4stent with the adjacent
developments. Both Windwood buildings and Dewey Hill buildings
cover approximately 204 of their total areas; Foster Green build-
ings would cover approximately 33% of its total area, a 50% greater
building density than the existing developments. (This includes the
third Dewey Hill building to be built in the future.)
2) Parking is limited to ground level. Both Dewey Hill and Windwood
have underground parking in addition to ground level areas designated
for parking., Foster Green project proposes only ground level garages -
and parking areas. This will not only add to the congested appear-
ance of this development; it will also decrease the area available
for lawns and landscaping. In addition, because of the fewer park-
ing spaces available, this may encourage parking on Cahill Road,
creating both a nuisance and a dangerous traffic hazard.
3) Concept is incompatible with the nature and character of the entire
Dewey Hills area of Edina, including the area of single family
dwelling west of the property in question. This entire area has
a spacious, natural "feel ". Landscaping throughout has incorporated
ponds, wooded areas, walking paths, etc. Even the industrial build-
ings on the east side of Cahill Road have been set back and well
landscaped to be compatible with the neighborhood.
We would hope that the Council will see fit to request that the proposed
project be reduced in building density, proferably by the use of a three
story building with underground parking; that the need for sufficient
guest parking off- street not be overlooked; and that the type and amount
of landscaping be compatible with both thle adjacent and other nearby
properties. We would also hope that the project be redesigned to insure
that the ingress and egress to Cahill Road not pose a traffic hazard.
We appreciate your consideration of our stated concerns.
Sincerely,
Alvin and Mildred Miller
5501 Dewey Hill Road - #232
Edina, MN 55435
�\�/ •
,r �
�� ,, - ,
`/� /, �,
�/ � � ' / /�
i" '
"-I
��-
�� a
i
AF
ss�/ l2d
4�3c?.,F
Edens,
(Y)/V, 55`35
5501 Dewey Hill Road
Edina, Minnesota
July 10, 1985
Dear Mayor C. Wayne Courtney:
Re: The Foster Green Addition
We have a very unhappy neighborhood surrounding the Brutger Bros.
planned development of The Foster Green Addition.
Residents of Dewey Hill Fast - West - Windwood - the two
Buildings North of Lewis Park feel the Concert of the planned
development is a Misfit for the Edina Area.
We think it is imperative that the Council Members /Planning
Commission make a personal survey visit of the Area. The
ground coverage of the Brutger Bros. Town House Cluster will
close in - take away the Park -like open spaces that all the other
Condo Buildings /Residences have preserved!
Truly, Foster Green property should be developed, but, with a
Concert of an Adult Three Story Building with underground
garages - landscaped in uniformity of the surrounding Area.
All of the Dewey Hill Neighborhood - Residences /Condo Buildings/
Landscaping - is a Place of Beauty. Let's keep Edina proud of
Proper Planning.
We are, also, fearful of another situation as we have on Cahill
across from Kenny's Plaza where vandalism /noise /wild traffic
has risen. Consult the Businesses there - Edina Police Dept..
Most of us living in Edina Condos are Retirees - long paying
Taxpayers from our Edina Homes. Please consider our Concerns.
We Thank You for hearing us through - and, ask that you re-
consider the Concept of the Foster Green Addition.
Since}r-ely Q C
Copies to: Lester and Ida Ost
Chuck Bredesen
Leslie Turner
Peggy Kelly
Fred Richards
'11�
r�ANNE We INSLOW OREN 5601 Dewey Hill Road, Apt. 303 Edina, Minnesota 55435
ge
TPL44tA
y �y
f
BET
SHALOM
July 10, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney,
1 "p nil
titym
NORMAN M. COHEN, RABBI
My wife and I live in the Dewey Hill condominium
development at 5601 Dewey Hill Road. We understand
that the Foster Green property that is proposed is
being discussed by City Council at the present time.
From all that we know, it seems as if the plans for
that space will not fit in aesthetically with the
rest of the neighborhood. As you well know, the
Gittelman property and other properties around it
have invested quite a bit in securing the greenery,
the shrubbery, the landscape that makes the Dewey
Hill area such a beautiful place to live.
We hope that the members of the City Council will
also place a high value on the importance of pre-
serving the beauty and pleasantness of our neigh-
borhood.
Sincerely,
Rabbi Norman M. Cohen
3601 PARK CENTER BLVD. • SUITE #102 • ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 • (612) 929 -2900
Ej U-L pito
=� e ocrure roc, e c
VtA -_76U.
T`'°�
Lb tt4,�
C w�w� -� l Uwe 0—
-D .�it Cc lam,
` PA
'Teft
` �Lt Ca 0
on
Ak
�A,� ems_ . � .�, •P�.v�
�tk
f
Gv\ eon
G-, l at2 ,
To the Mayor:
The Bruttger.Company built a beautiful condiminium
(apartment style) near Rosedale. It is six stories
with underground parking.
Something similar would be more in keeping with our
neighborhood, rather than cluster -homes or town- homes.
Thank you.
Dewey hill resident..... Elsie Hall
5601 Dewey]Hill #308
Edina
Please share this letter with council members.
J
55 1 Dewey-' Hill Rd
It 28
t
SAMARI
IETHODI
, °- tODUNTRY
SIDE
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
A
.. -V
.''
MEN a
Moll
.0-
F N
kip
r
NUMBER i
L O C A T 10 N Curtis E. Austin
Lot 4, Block 2
Warden Acres Austin Replat. Generally located south of
REQUEST Grove Street and east of Oak Lane.
Subdivision that would create one buildable lot
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GAkDEN•
RIDGE PARA, . • �:
MEN a
Moll
.0-
F N
kip
r
NUMBER i
L O C A T 10 N Curtis E. Austin
Lot 4, Block 2
Warden Acres Austin Replat. Generally located south of
REQUEST Grove Street and east of Oak Lane.
Subdivision that would create one buildable lot
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
S -85 -6 Curtis E. Austin
Lot 4, Block 2
Warden Acres Austin Replat.
Generally located south of Grove Street and east
Of Oak Lane
Preliminary Plat approval Warden Acres Austin 2nd
replat.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the property
measures 138 feet in width and 239 in depth and is 33,057 -
square feet in size. The proponent is requesting a
subdivision which would create one buildable lot of 12,327
square feet with the remaining 20,730 square feet designated
as an outlot.
Mr. Larsen added that a previous replat of this
property included the dedication of 25 feet along the
southerly property line in anticipation of an extension of
Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way
must be acquired before this could take place. The property
is now.accessed by a temporary cul de sac which terminates
in the northwesterly corner of the property.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proponents intent is to create
one buildable lot while reserving the balance of the
property for future subdivision. Since the balance of the
property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be
buildable without replatting. the lot size of the proposed
lot is similar to other lots in the vicinity. Staff
recommends preliminary plat approval.
Mrs. Helen McClelland moved for preliminary plat
approval. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 26, 1985
S -85 -6 Curtis E. Austin
Lot 4, Block 2
Warden Acres Austin Replat.
Generally located south of
Grove Street and east of
Oak Lane.
Preliminary plat approval Warden Acres Austin 2nd replat.
Refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat
The subject property measures 138 feet in width and 239 in
depth and is 33,057 square feet . in size. The proponent is
requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable
lot of 12,327 square feet with the remaining 20,730 square
feet designated as an outlot.
A previous replat of this property included the dedication
of 25 feet along the southerly property line in anticipation
of an extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue.'
Additional right of way must be acquired before this could
take place. The property is now accessed by a temporary cul
de sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner-of the
property.
Recommendation
The proponents intent is to create one buildable lot while
reserving the balance of the property for future
subdivision. Since the balance of the property would be
designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable without
replatting. The lot size of the proposed lot is similar to
other lots in the vicinity. Staff recommends preliminary
plat approval.
OARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE
941-3030 0 LAND SURVEYORS
° EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
Surve For: Curt Austin _
r
Star H 2, Box 135 0
Pequot Lakes, MN 56472 Book Page '
p °
PROPOSED LOT SUBDIVISION WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT
°
- a
a
Area Lot 1= 12,327 sq. ft.
Area Outlot "A "= 20,730 sq. ft.
I — -
i /O� h LOT 1, BLK.L o/
PRO POSED hRrH
7'
_
LAJ
I b —1 Scz1 la : I =4G
rc
M
J , o I _
` I ` ^ I OUTLOT "A"
0
a _
I °
i I •: FASL:MEN (/TL /L /Ty �S
--s' _ ��to _ _EASE/►1L=NTS .L I
/p !
239� z0
0
OA
° K LANE
G "
O
1 benbr oortl►y that this Is a true and correct reprewniatfon of n surrey of the boundaries of LOT 4, QLOC/� Z of f
w.gRDEH ACRES /ZEPLAT Hennepin County, Minnesota and of the JpFaHon of all bui thereon, and all
ddble encroachments, if any, from or an said {and. Surveyed by ms this '`1 day oi ...........
�' CARDARELLE & ASSOCIAnS, INC.
A
a
a
PAM
was introduced. He explained that the addition will be used for additional office
s ace for National Car, utilizing an open office concept. Additional stora ace
w be needed, and the cafeteria will be expanded to allow for a French
cafe eling instead of a totally enclosed space. There will also be or
utilit ooms within the building. Mr. Worthington feels the desig m-
patible the existing architecture, and they may be back in t ure for
even fur xpansion. Construction, if the project is appr s slated to
begin in June 1985, with a completion date of April, 19 mber Kelly
questioned the p� osed road to be cut through on the s portion as to
whether it will imp the proposed Homart Project a nearness to the
drainage ditch. Mr. man explained that the r 1 go right over the top
of the ditch and northwe ver to 77th Stree commented that the road is
tied into serving both prop ies ( Homart s), and it serves as an extra
outlet from the Pentagon Park a. Ha a road is on Edina's property,
and the other half is in Bloomin urther comment being heard, Member
Turner moved adoption of the foll,� esolution:
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of the of Edina, Minnesota, that the
Final Development Plan f Corporation oval Car Rental Systems at 7700
France Avenue be and approved and that a' oot drive isle setback
variance i"s grante ject to the following con 'r s: 1) That additional
right -of -way, a ed on the westerly portion of the be dedicated at
this time; a That the non - conforming parking spaces a south property
line be r when the new street is constructed. Motion for a of the
resolu as seconded by Member Kelly.
KO il:
Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
esolution adopted.
R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT FOR ROBERT ANDERSON OF 425 WASHINGTON AVENUE
FAILED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting City Clerk,
approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the subject
property is generally located east of Washington Avenue and north of Maloney
Avenue, actually on the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County
Road 18 is located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is
to the south. The site measures 70 feet in width, approximately 125 in depth
and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. The site is vacant. The proponent,
Mr. Robert Anderson, is requesting rezoning of the site from R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District, in order to allow
the construction of a two -unit dwelling. The zoning ordinance requires R -2 lots
to be at least 90 feet in width and to contain at least 15,000 square feet in
lot area. Consequently, lot width and lot area variances would also be required
to make this a buildable R -2 site. Mr. Larsen described the two -block stretch
of lots fronting on Washington Avenue as low- density attached residential. At
the present time, there are four existing doubles which are zoned R -2 and two
legal, non - conforming doubles on Washington. There are eleven single- dwelling
units fronting on Washington Avenue. The existing double bungalow lots measure
between 76 and 79 feet in width, except for the most northerly lot which measures
124 feet in width. The existing R -1 lots measure between 45 and 78 feet in width.
Mr. Larsen explained that the subject site is designated by the Comprehensive
Plan as being suitable for the proposed use. In addition to this designation,
the Plan contains a policy which states: "Consider the redevelopment or retro-
filling of single- family dwellings to multi - family uses if located in areas
5/20/85
designated as low density attached residential. Such redevelopment or retro-
filling should require rezoning and upgrading of dwellings and properties to
multi - family standards." Using the required setbacks for the lot, it appears
that a modestly sized double bungalow or duplex could be constructed on the
site which would conform to zoning ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen stated
that the development or redevelopment of properties along Washington as
doubles is reasonable and to be expected; however, he commented that staff
does have reservations concerning the minimum size of lots to be developed
as doubles. (At this time, 7:35 PM, Member Bredesen arrived.) Mr.'Robert
Anderson, the owner of the subject property, presented to the Council the plan
of the structure. He pointed out that the garages are in the front of the
structure, with the setback being 30 or 35 feet. There is an alley in the back
which is not being used at the present time; the lots have extended into the
alley, although the alley has not been officially vacated. The cemetery is
immediately to the south, and County Road 18 is to the front of the dwelling,
immediately to the west. Member Richards indicated that this is a strong neighbor-
hood of single - family residences; he felt that a more appropriate use, given the
variance being requested, would be R -1 and not R -2. Therefore, he did not
support the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mrs. Turner commented that
this concept is similar to accessory housing; this is a transitional area
between single family homes and a busy highway. She felt that it was an
opportunity for relatively modest housing and that the zoning request is
appropriate. Member Richards indicated that this is a situation in which the
exact same square footage of land has doubled its density; this creates
problems in other contexts and other forms. He felt that land packages
could be created for a better environment. Member Kelly pointed out a similar
home on either William.or Bedford built on property that wasn't quite adequate,
so the garage was put out in front. -Mr. Anderson commented that the garage
out in front of the subject property was to serve as a buffer from County Road
18. He added that there are two double bungalows right next door to the
project. There being no further discussion, Member Turner's motion for approval
of the zoning change was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner
Nays: Richards, Courtney
Motion failed.
10 FRANCE AVENUE 5 U "WYIHDRIAWN. Tanner Larsen reported that t
proponent has asked to withdraw the appeal, which pertained to 7010 nce
Avenue South, Lot 1 and adjacent vacated R. W. W., Block 1, St Edgemoor
Addition. There was no further discussion.
HEALTH HAZARDS OF LAWN SPRAYING WITH CHEMICALS_ SED. Mary Reed, 5100
Skyline Drive, spoke of her concern regard hemlawn's spraying of chemicals
on lawns approximately two times eac She reported that she had spoken
with the Health Department three s ago, and she was told that a study had
been done. She felt that a - study should be done in that there might be
some new information i gard to the chemicals and associated health hazards.
Mr. Rosland report at the outcome of a study indicated that the City's
spraying is don a very judicious manner and every piece of property is not
sprayed all time. Mayor Courtney recommended obtaining information from
the stu one in St. Paul. Mr. Rosland commented that all of the known
chemi s are being used; there are pros and cons as to whether any of them
ca ancer or not. Al 0
the a e e_d 'this does not rule out the fact that they might be
harmful. Member Bredesen reported that there has been a concern regarding the
nnrticles from the chemicals getting into the ^ir: he also recommended following
Ili
TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL:
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED, OWNERS CF FRCFERTY WITHIN CLOSE PROXIMITY OF PROPERTY OWNED BY
ROBERT J. ANDERSON, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHIrGTOV AND MALCNEY AVENUE,
DO HEREBY SUPPORT HIS REZONING REQUEST FROM R -1 TO R -2 TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF
A TWO FAMILY D ?,TELLING.( PROPERTY ADDRESS 425 — WASHINGTON AVENUE
All
ztC`,�y�iv�G �� �.C� ��.// � L Lam" •"�%'' -�� GG�Ll� SGT .
7 �
TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA, MN
FROM: ROBERT J. ANDERSON
12851— BURWELL DRIVE
MINNETONY.A, MN 55343
PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING CONCL'RNING THE ATTACHED PETITION.
THAT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESSES ON WASHIPGTON AVENUE ARE TENQT OCCUPIED PROPERTIES:
401, 403,407,409,415, 417,419,
SOME OF THESE PROPERTY OWN'E1RS LIVE OUT OF TOWN AND 2 OR 3 PARCELS ARE OWNED BY HENNEPIN
COUNTY.
OF ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS CONTACTED THEY ALL WERE AFFIRr[ATIVE AND NO ONE EXPRESSED
ANY NEGATIVE VIE.'! TOWARD MY REZONING REQUEST OF 425— WASHINGTON AVENUE FROM R -1 TO R -2o
THANKING YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONCER:d.
STNCERE Y,
L -o5 -t ttooert anaerson, 425 vwasaingzon Avenue
n Generally located: East of Washington Avenue and
QV North of Maloney Avenue
5A 1
- Mr. Larsen stated that the subject property is located
on the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue.
County Road 18 is located to the immediate west of the site
and Grandview Cemetery is to the south. The site measures
70 feet in width, approximately 125 in depth and contains
8,898 square feet of lot area. The site is vacant.
The proponent is requesting rezoning of the site from
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling
Unit District, in order to allow the construction of a two -
unit dwelling. The zoning ordinance requires R -2 lot to be
at least 90 feet in width and to contain at least 15,000
square feet in lot area. Consequently, lot width and lot
area variances would also be required to make this a
buildable R -2 site.
He said that the Comprehensive Plan illustrates the
two - block- stretch of lots fronting on Washington Avenue as
low- density attached residential. Presently, there are four
i
existing doubles which are zoned R -2 and two legal, non-
conforming doubles on Washington. There are eleven single -
dwelling units fronting on Washington Avenue. The existing
double bungalow lots measure between 76 and 79 feet in
width, except for the most northerly lot which measures 124
feet in width. The existing R -1 lots measure between 45 and
78 feet in width.
Mr. Larsen continued by stating that the subject site
is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as being suitable
for the proposed use. In addition to this designation the
Plan contains a policy which states: "Consider the
redevelopment or retro - filling of single- family dwellings to
multi - family uses if located in areas designated as low
density attached residential. Such redevelopment or retro-
filling should require rezoning and upgrading of dwellings
and properties to multi- family standards. Using the
required setbacks for the lot, it appears that a modestly
sized double bungalow or duplex could be constructed on the
site which would conform to zoning ordinance requirements.
The development or redevelopment of properties along
Washington as doubles is reasonable and to be expected.
Staff does, however, have reservations concerning the
minimum size of lots to be developed as doubles.
Notwithstanding its reservations concerning lot size, staff
reccommended approval of this rezoning.
Mr. Robert Anderson was present.
Mrs. McClelland believed that the variances needed were
too large and in spite of the fact that there were
nonconforming doubles next door, they were not necessarily
legal. She was not in favor of the rezoning.
Mr. Anderson presented plans for the Commission to
view. Mr. Larsen presented a location map demonstrating the
various locations of doubles in the neighborhood.
Upon discussion, Mr. Palmer stated that he agreed with
the Staff. A single - family home located at this site was
not particularity desireable. He moved for approval of the
rezoning and Mr. Skagerberg seconded the motion. Mrs.
McClelland and Mr. Sked were opposed. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 1, 1985
Z -85 -2 Robert Anderson, 425 Washington Avenue
Generally located: East of Washington Avenue and
North of Maloney Avenue
Refer to: Attached survey, area map and photos
The subject property is located on the corner of Washington
Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County Road 18 is located to the
immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is to the
south. The site measures.70 feet in width, approximately
125 in depth and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area.
The proponent is requesting rezoning of the site from R-1,
Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit
District, in order to allow the construction of a two -unit
dwelling. The zoning ordinance requires R -2 lots to be at
least 90 feet in width and to contain at least 15,000 square
feet in lot area. Consequently, a lot width and lot area
variances would also be required to make this a buildable
R -2 site.
The Comprehensive Plan illustrates the two - block- stretch of
lots fronting on Washington Avenue as low- density attached
residential. Presently, there are four existing doubles
which are zoned R -2 and two legal, non - conforming doubles on
Washington. There are eleven single - dwelling units fronting
on Washington Avenue. The existing double bungalow lots
measure between 76 and 79 feet in width, except for the most
northerly lot which measures 124 feet in width. The
existing R -1 lots measure between 45 and 78 feet in width.
Recommendation
The subject site is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as
being suitable for the proposed use. In addition to this
designation the Plan contains a policy which states:
"Consider the redevelopment or retro - filling of single -
family dwellings to multi - family uses if located in areas
designated as low density attached residential. Such
redevelopment or retro- filling should require rezoning and
upgrading of dwellings and properties to multi - family
standards. Using the required setbacks for the lot, it
appears that a modestly sized double bungalow or duplex
could be constructed on the site which would conform to
zoning ordinance requirements.
The development or redevelopment of properties along
Washington as doubles is reasonable and to be expected. We
do, however, have reservations concerning the minimum size
of lots to be developed as doubles.
Although the Comprehensive Plan shows low density attached
residential for the street, each individual parcel may not,
alone, have that potential.
Notwithstanding our reservations concerning lot size, we
would recommend approval of this rezoning.
CA.LE : I INCH a30FEET
ENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET
."41NO3 SHOWN ARE ASSUMED
:L7 1984
G
T
CTl
C..
0
x
SURVEY
HENNEPIN
FOR
COUNTY
-,-?a r - C— (- /-V ,
7.1
- - -- 33 12
25.9 -- �.
Lt ! C�
G
Q- rNorth line of the South 24ft. of Lot 18
389040'OeE
a v I 127.39 ).. .�•
o: LIJ LIJ
N r
LIJ o = 3
{, o o AREA = Sage c
• m u7 O Ch
0
._. - Q
71
t` o
,�.
C l �.� South line of Lot 14
in
3-W. am of Lot I
•.�_ 12 2.20
��1 ! 589040'02" E 12
0 00
Wonaroto Curb M
M �
t
989 40'02 °E j 1, �� t r :�. g� /r'- South lino of N.W.I /4 &JN.W.1 4
i
0 1
N p
, _ N
Lot 14 and the south 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block
Heights ", except that part of said Lot 14 lying
line drawn from a point on the west line of said
feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot
south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east
corner of said Lot 14.
9,. "West Minneapolis
southwesterly of a
Lot 14 distant 5.00
14 to a point on the
from the southwest
T_ hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision this fir, day of ✓411,,, 1984 and that I am a duly Regis-
tered Land purveyor under the laws of the�State of Minnesota.
L. Hak; :a M14 License ,lo. 7093
C�unc,r Surveyor
i1c."' pin Cou, : y , h?iJ
CkLE : I INCH •30 FEET
DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET
_:,RINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED
:L7 1884
T
cri
b
SURVEY
HENNEPIN
FOR
COUNTY
u rLC= / .3 7 "
7.1
33 • 12
'� Lk I RED `-Tr Biel s n�
W n
- Lo;
North I Of the th 24 f t. of Lot
� a
eE
N ....:. 38
S89 °40 0
• L. 1 - -
,
A a J cU��
LIJ =
0
,u Cry M o~ Cc o
AREA 8898 aq. tt
- - - --
33--- - F 914 R-A.915 o
. a / South line of Lot 14
*_ 122.20
389040'02"E 12
3 W. ocr of Lot 14� {1�
15.00 F —81ad�top ��
�0Oncrete Cwp —i-- M
• I ,
589040'oe i
W. l /4 3
�.•. � � . - tN. of
i
o �
N n
Lot 14 and the south 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block
Heialits ", except that part of said Lot 14 lying
line drawn from a point on the west line of said
feet north from the southwest corner of said Lot
south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east
corner of said Lot 14.
9,. "West ttinneanolis
southwesterly of a
Lot 14 distant 5.00
14 to a point on the
from the southwest
T- hereby certify that this survey was prepared h� me or under my direct
supervision this D-day of ��� p
tered Land :surveyor under the 1e l —aws oflthe,State that Minnam a duly '.egis-
R' >I.ci t L. HakG'a M14 License , 70. a 3
Surveyor
i1C:inc{,ln Cou,.: y, P?iJ
a
22
ANO.114
"13 rd
al
ty 1.
L
?5 _2 Sti e
'N
-4 — — 23 V 4
22 5 b) `)"22 5lye Cif LZ
20 4- 20
CIA 19
14 9
. L
CA� r Av `— : <�ol r 7
10 !7
0%
Lid 12 W jI'
5
>
< hle
13 .4- CZ 1 4 1
'A
......,:,BELMORE
3015 3• �3'441 130.3
=70
? I__ ^�,v �
25L Lo� A
-2
In
k24 WS
23
22(fi-)
21
ro
20 7
?_10
di
z 0 - ol
19 r,94 9 a x
xz
41D
V
k
Lu
79 u
71
r
gl 4 (81)
7j
sLjBSE 1
77
2(101)
A.7
- 1 3
----MALONEY
FCC
-,Y D,?934
t-. C w
adol
0
1)w
L%U
ty 1.
L
?5 _2 Sti e
'N
-4 — — 23 V 4
22 5 b) `)"22 5lye Cif LZ
20 4- 20
CIA 19
14 9
. L
CA� r Av `— : <�ol r 7
10 !7
0%
Lid 12 W jI'
5
>
< hle
13 .4- CZ 1 4 1
'A
......,:,BELMORE
3015 3• �3'441 130.3
=70
? I__ ^�,v �
25L Lo� A
-2
In
k24 WS
23
22(fi-)
21
ro
20 7
?_10
di
z 0 - ol
19 r,94 9 a x
xz
41D
V
k
Lu
79 u
71
r
gl 4 (81)
7j
sLjBSE 1
77
2(101)
A.7
- 1 3
----MALONEY
FCC
-,Y D,?934
t-. C w
adol
0
1)w
, r-9
REZONING..
mr
LLM
....... . . . . . . . .
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
rdina, Minnesota 5542'P
"Ir. ?obert J. And.,rsoyi
1.2851 DU7':!Pl Dnl :re
':';inn^ t or_'ca , 5531
TeIephon,�: (51 -") X35 -6855
July
Dear r;Tayor Courtney,
Please Find enclosed information nertainin -7 to rezoning hearing,
( ?_ to 2), on July l,, i_?85 City o,. sdi.na Council meeting, for
property located at 425 �9ashir_gton Avenue.
The enclosed picture is similar to the structure that we are
considering for the lot.
P:1y daughter and son -in -law would live in one half of the twin home.
Thankin- You,
?ober-„ J. Anderson
CONDITIOMAL USE
NUMBER C -85 -1
L O C A T 10 N Creek Valley Baptist Church
6400 Tracy Avenue
REQUEST Construction of additional classroom space,
restrooms and general storage
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
III. NEW BUSINESS
C -85 -1 Creek Valley Baptist Church
6400 Tracy Avenue
Generally located south of Crosstown
and west of Tracy Avenue
Creek Valley Baptist is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
to allow the construction of additional classrooms space,
restrooms and general storage. The addition would contain a
total of 3,780 square feet. The addition would be to the
south of the existing structure. All classroom activities
are currently held in the basement. No other changes to the
site are contemplated at this time.
Mr. Larsen added the Zoning Ordinance requires that
churches provide parking at a rate of one space for every
three seats in the largest place of assembly, at Creek
Valley the sanctuary contains 132 seats which results in a
parking demand of 44 spaces. The existing parking lot,
although not striped, provides parking for 53 cars.
Mr Larsen continued that there are approximately 45
families and 100 total members in the church. Pastor Brice
is the only pastor for the congregation.
Mr. Larsen concluded the church is situated in a
relatively isolated location. To west and south are City
owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown
highway. The site contains mature landscaping that provides
additional screening. The design and materials of the
addition will match the existing building, and parking will
be provided in adequate numbers. Staff recommends approval
of the permit subject to plans presented.
Mr. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the
Conditional Use Permit subject to staff recommendations.
John Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The
motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 26, 1985
C -85 -1 Creek Valley Baptist Church
6400 Tracy Avenue
Generally located south of Crosstown
and west of Tracy Avenue
Refer to: Attached site plan and building plans
and project summary
Creek Valley Baptist is requesting a Conditional Use Permit
to allow the construction of additional classrooms space,
restrooms and general storage. The addition would contain a
total of 3,780 square feet. The addition would be to the
south of the existing structure. All classroom activities
are currently held in the basement. No other changes to the
site are contemplated at this time.
The Zoning Ordinance requires that churches provide parking
at a rate of one space for every three seats in the largest
place of assembly, at Creek Valley the sanctuary contains
132 seats which results in a parking demand of 44 spaces.
The existing parking lot, although not striped, provides
parking for 53 cars.
There are approximately 45 families and 100 total members in
the church. Pastor Brice is the only pastor for the
congregation.
Recommendation
The church is situated in a relatively isolated location.
To west and south are City owned open space areas and to the
north is the Crosstown highway. The site contains mature
landscaping that provides additional screening. The design
and materials of the addition will match the existing
building, and parking will be provided in adequate numbers.
Staff recommends approval of the permit.
Creek Valley Baptist Church Addition
PROJECT SUMMARY
Building Area:
Existing
Upper Level 3,040
Lower Level 4,364
7,404
New
Total
2;680
5,720
1,100
5,464
3,780
11,184
Major..Materials:
Prestressed Concrete Floor with Masonry Load - Bearing Walls
Pre - fabricated Wood Truss Roof
Face Brick Exterior (to match existing) with wood trim
Pre - finished windows (to match existing)
Composition Shingle Roof (sloped)
Single -ply Membrane Roof (flat)
Building Program:
Existing building functions remain unchanged.
New Addition to consist of Adult and Youth Classroom spaces, two handicapped
accessible toilet rooms, miscellaneous storage and support spaces.
I
I
l ErHwo. 'WT.'M l 7►au.wl e..j— —r- -- — j.
�Ml{NgfAWt IN {NtN /NNINNNNYYYYN /llM { {lll tYtl Y{{ tll l {tllttNlt /INNNI /t {tN {N { { {M{l {� \
tO
I,�
,ite F I
_ -
,A m m .41W MON-W-
ol
1 1
ml
Survey "
0 so
N
I
LJ
N
Af A
;!� i)A:
,i
Itsmaq:a6i4 AJD ALt�Ip
ft' Ju ' W.O&.
East
(Tracy Avenue) Elevation,
0 8.
4 V *pwor '
�t.ac..�LOA•.0 91►�.%* � � - - - - - - - - - - - - - ; / �p1LLJ +7<1.MlN'OLO1•It. bLL
or's
0.
I I
- 1
G•J• i
TI — � Fl4� P• tlbt '
11
9rl � III •r(yrll.o7)
• - �: � `� loci t � v - .. �.•...
A /
• u•I. � ii,l i
4( r
� i X02 A �• o.• IyI .
C., J. x ± op
Upper Flo r',p
I I
,
Y� ruM wJ( •www r..i�w ��
f 1 wc�at�iq,l Mnl !r
" IJiid riMM I I. • . � - - - - .
�'�� � 1 • -- � ✓'.•F .� 71 rile:•
. -.`'2: .. I'.. <ilirw.►�L►.i� • •Irk - I t 1 1 F -
All
•�1 !1� ►► i► `..._.. i I t ICI t 1 i
ce
►n•-I 41 a., o I- -;cbi '! I I I I I I i f' I -?4LW vow.4 •wMjf.
K.�.. V�+rJ•.Ow.r�r
11 U6 JA-IL-
--a amply ol. 4
1
y
wl I
�W\ l
.o weI
0 s
•T N
/ V
L +i^.1Ar.r. :.�rL �� 1JW swly{wuiil�M •.4�t' �Vtt-
H•� . �sN 410E UY4
I
r
"r4- -cnw-
�Py dT-
iL&—V-4&v
cn%&404 060AP.
-?,saw Kaom6 sLbA
tw
K.0- LL&A
mwGnwgwowp,%
1 7— VWLf-Wr Poop
T
1-4 L ,
MI. P- Its
1pmig.bL abkI� 40-L,6 &004"
of zewqa�wa 40
%jam
• VdidTW& VPWW WIW6TO ltSMOv%V V*40M d'd'JT4 611-1\01WJ
0 To IML IKIWW O*WTW LLWAqw"
South Elevation.i
0 a
fp-
14
Cl _`1
%jam
• VdidTW& VPWW WIW6TO ltSMOv%V V*40M d'd'JT4 611-1\01WJ
0 To IML IKIWW O*WTW LLWAqw"
South Elevation.i
0 a
+r •r r'VwVf
M-11
."Po" WoA Lw'
lRlg6w4,a(iQ le TMN
16w? �10�wlfw
a o.-w6i "w1
�uc.c dmLADf 15W a,�kg"
o► W ua 4ff"jIru4jj1N To maysm
V I4T,
J[LLor.4Tw Vo"N y1NJ�
ALL O�u�NLLLwji/AJ
KAA
yPL�f 'PJL� K.
N .1
2
4
West n:;
0 8
fZEQUEST FOR PURMASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works & City Engineer
JIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Hanaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: July 10, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Building Removal.& Backfilling of Wooddale School - 4500 West 50th Street
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1, See attached Bid Tabulation
2.
Department Recommendation: Carl Balander & Sons Co. $123,500.00
Engineering
i:gnat Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City F aner's Endorsement:
✓ 1. I concur c r wi t h
the reconrr,endation of the Department and reconunend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
neth (Zosl"a►jd, City t•lanager
A
TABULATION OF BIDS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
CONTRACT #85 -6 (ENG)
BUILDING REMOVAL & BACKFILLING
OF
WOODDALE SCHOOL
4500 WEST 50TH STREET
BID OPENING - JULY 10, 1985 - 11:00 A.M.
BIDDER
TOTAL BID
Carl Bol ander _& Sons Co.--
1123.son-on
Minn..Lumber & Wrecking Co
Doty & Sons, Inc.
$162,000.00
Duluth Superior Erection
$174,500.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE:
$241,112.50
I%�tQULJI f UiZ I'Ut(l.,liiSE
TO: Mayor and City Council
'ROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works & City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City flanaver
SUBJECT: REgUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEN Ifs EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: July 10, 1935
Material Description (General Specifications):
2 Falls Model TA+i -9 Wings (Snow Plow)
Quotations /Bids:
Com any
1. LaHaas Mfg. & Sales
2. Little Falls Machine
�r
'Amount of Quote or Bid
$7,373.00
$7,410.00
Department P.econnendation: LaHaas Mfg. & Sales $7,373.00
Public Works
Signat e Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recomnended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
City 4ananer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the reconrr,endation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City 11anager
REQUEST FOR PURL; iASE
-G
TO: Mayor and City Council
,ROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works & City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITF11 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: July 10, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Supply & install all pipe, bearings and parts to repair.pump for Well #6.
Sand blast & paint discharge head - sandblast line shaft & check for straightness.
Reinstall pump.& motor.
(Emergency Repair)
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Layne Minnesota -Inc. $6,855.00
2. Keys.Well Drilling
E. H. Renner & Sons
$8,275.00
$8,050.00
Department Recommendation: Layne, Minnesota Inc. $6,855.00
• Public Works
Signatur Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. m, valen, Finance Director
City Ma ner's Endorser:ent:
,4 I concur with the recorrrendation of the Department and recommend C n i
ucl approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
e neth Ros and, City Manager
Members present:
Members absent:
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JULY 9, 1985 .
9:00 AM
Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Lois Coon
Gordon Hughes
Craig Swanson
Alison Fuhr
Others present: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department
Ruth Pedersen, 6128 Sherman Circle, Edina
Trish Brown, 6137 Sherman Circle, Edina
Jane Griffin, 6104 Sherman Circle, Edina
Sally King, 6132 Sherman Circle, Edina
Chuck Thysell, 6112 Sherman Circle, Edina
George E. Skluzacek, 5417 Malibu Drive, Edina
(Edina Senior High)
Section A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
1. Request for "NO PARKING" signs on Olinger'Boulevard near Sherman Circle.
Petition received from twelve residents on Sherman.Circle.
11 f.T T A 11 TA1 /r.l_ - - -
Mr. Hoffman reported that previously approved "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs
will be erected along the west and south sides of.Olinger Boulevard along
Bredesen Park.
Residents reported that the increased use of the park has prompted safety
concerns due to vehicles turning about and parking along Olinger Boulevard
and Sherman Circle. Additionally, residents requested prohibiting park users
from parking in the residential areas. Chief Swanson explained the inability
to enforce such a regulation other than by time restrictions which would
equally affect residents. Mr. Hoffman explained that a parking lot paving
project should be completed by July 15, 1985 which should accommodate park
users. He additionally suggested that solving Olinger Boulevard parking
should be undertaken first and then possibly addressing Sherman Circle
parking at a later time if the problem still exists.
TRAFFIC SAFE COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 1985
Page 2
Mr. Hughes moved that, "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs be installed along the
east and north sides of Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Olinger
Road simultaneously with the opening of the Bredesen Park arp king lot.
Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
1. Discuss traffic flow.patterns on Maple Road.
Request received from Mrs. Allen Karinen, 4928 Maple Road.
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven reported no accidents on'Maple Road since January 1, 1983.
The only traffic problems along the road have been parking complaints
relating to employee parking from the West 50th Street and France Avenue
commercial area.
Mr. Hoffman reported that traffic volumes and patterns along Maple Road
are not unusual.
Mrs. Coon moved denial of the request. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion.
Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
1. Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 40th Street at Monterey Avenue.
Request received from Roy Lewis, 4000 Monterey Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN:
Captain Kleven reported that the requestor stated he wanted to be present
during discussion of the request. The requestor was not present at the
meeting.
Mrs..Coon moved the item be continued until such time that the requestor
could appear. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 =0.
2. Request for traffic signal on Valley View Road at exit from Edina Junior/
Senior High School campus.
Request received from George Skluzacek, Assistant Principal, Edina High
School.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 1985
Page 3
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Skluzacek, representing the School District, stated he has had eight
years experience with traffic around the campus and has made the following
observations:
(a) Student driving has changed -- greater numbers,of students
drive and more traffic is generated.
(b) The greatest volume of traffic occurs at 2:35 PM on school
days for approximately 7 -1/2 minutes.
(c) There is serious congestion and safety concerns at the east
access to the campus.
(d) A traffic signal at the east entrance would solve the problem.
Mr. Hoffman reported that traffic volume on Valley View Road is approximately
3500 vehicles daily. He also stated engineering solutions include:
(a) Signal light controlling Valley View Road that would only be
activated during dismissal times.
(b) A one -way outbound driveway that would correspond with the
controlled intersection at Valley View Road.and Antrim Road.
(c) Permitting two -way traffic on the school's perimeter road.
Captain Kleven reported no accidents at the east entrance to the campus.
Mr. Skluzacek suggested a police officer be assigned to the intersection
during dismissal. Chief Swanson explained that the department did not
have sufficient manpower for such.a commitment. Mr. Skluzacek explained
that approximately 50 buses and 250 student vehicles are involved in the
dismissal congestion problem.
Chief Swanson moved that the item be continued and a meeting between city
and school staff be conducted to discuss remedies. Mr. Hughes seconded
the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
3. Request for traffic - signal at Gleason Road and Vernon Avenue.
Request received from James Armstrong, 6650 Vernon Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN:
The committee discussed the request and the need to formally request
Hennepin County to become involved in a study. Also, signal installations
are scheduled for Vernon Avenue at Tracy Avenue and Blake Road during 1985.
These installations may have an impact on the intersection in question.
r
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
July 9, 1985
Page 4
Mr. Hughes moved that the committee defer action on the item and not
request the county to conduct a feasability study. Mrs. Coon seconded
the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
��,'4�elope was addressed to Mayor and City Council)
l 1 etersen m. d.
g enn . p
4313 Cornelia circle
edina, minnesota 55435
QrIA-
7v " Vow 1
Tw-t.,
SZ
I
I I
By Laurie Blake
Staff Writer
Traffic and weather have combined
to give south Minneapolis more than
its usual dose of airport noise in the
past three weeks and may for sever-
al more, airport officials said Mon-
day.
After hearing the high -noise predic-
tion, City Council Member Steve
Cramer of south Minneapolis yester-
day invited local and state officials
representing communities surround-
ing Minneapolis -St. Paul Internation-
al Airport to a meeting about airport
noise.
"It's just been truly miserable over
south Minneapolis in the last three
weeks," the 11th Ward council mem-
ber said. "I've been getting more
calls than ever. Increasingly, there is
no time during the day when south
Minneapolis gets any relief."
Cramer said his action was prompt-
ed by his hearing a report by Les
Case, the Federal Aviation Adminis-
tration's (FAA) air traffic manager
at the airport.
Case, speaking at a Metropolitan Air-
ports Commission meeting yester-
day, said that traffic and wind condi-
tions have forced heavier- than -usual
use of two parallel runways that di-
rect airplanes over south Minneapo-
lis.
Darrell Weslander, noise control of-
ficer for the airports commission,
estimated that the two runways have
been in use 25 to 30 percent more
often than a year ago. Noise com-
Steve Cramer
plaints also are up.
The meeting will be at 7:30 p.m. July
25 in the Richfield City Hall council
chambers. Cramer said airport noise.
has become a metropolitan -wide is-
sue that merits the attention of local
and state officials. He said he is
hoping that communities around the
airport will agree they can handle
only so much noise.
If the noise cannot be limited,
Cramer suggested that the number
of planes must be limited, or another
airport built to accommodate some
of the traffic.
The FAA controls decisions regard-
ing air traffic and state and local
officials cannot set policies changing
air travel, Cramer said. But if Minne-
sota officials do not reach a consen-
sus there will be no bargaining point
with federal officials, he said.
Ibe-
to a
Minneapolis Star and Tribune
Tuesday, July 9, 1985
381.
en' city financing.
The league's Paul Gllje said the re-
port wants a "good direct tax alter-
native rather than an indirect one."
Tax- increment financing has been
used for such projects as City Center
in downtown Minneapolis and build -
Ing a freeway interchange in Brook-
lyn Park. The report contends that
cities end up in bidding wars to get
developments, thus raising the pub-
lic cost of development. It recom-
mends more metro-wide review of
projects.
State Rep. Bill Schreiber, IR- Brook-
lyn Park, chairman of the House Tax
Committee, said his committee will
look at tax- increment financing this
fall. "I personally believe that tax -
increment financing is a rather hid-
den method for certain types of de-
velopment. Accountability is the is-
sue for me."
Minneapolis officials who say that
tax - increment financing has been
r .a�
the grease that made development
wheels of the city turn in the past
few years are unhappy with the
league report. They believe that thg.
city has been open when it made'
decisions on tax- increment districts.,,
Jim Heltzer, director of the Minnd-;
apolis Community Developme'n '
Agency, said, "I'm not convinced this'
idea would create any more open or
less complex process than we have°
today."
Minneapolis officials also worry that
any development fund that would be
supported with state dollars would,
not help inner cities, and they polo
to recent legislative attitudes to but'',
tress that opinion.
Tony Scallon, chairman of the coun-
cil's development committee, said,
"tax- increment financing is the last
tool this city has left for develop,,
ment. Does anyone believe we'd get,'
a fair shake from the state ?"
J
d
Y,
a �
jr G
PROM
CENTER & CATERING COMPANY
1190 UNIVfRSIUAVfNUf • Sr. PAK MINNESOTA 55104
July 2, 1985
Office of the Mayor
Councilmen & City Managers
4801 West 59th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Gentlemen,
The present level of airport noise in the city of Edina is
unacceptable. You need read no farther.
If you are still reading, this note is to register strong
objections to the greatly increased aircraft noise levels
especially in the 7AM time frame.
Fiscal considerations will become more complicated if many
of us move away to regain quiet residential conditions.
Lse crumbles.
119.0 UNIVERSITY AVENUE • SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55104 . 645 -0596
July 9, 1985
Dear Friend,
077c_
By all indications this will be a record setting year for the number of
commercial air carrier operations at Minneapolis -St. Paul International airport.
The attendant increase in aircraft noise has made an already serious problem for
our communities much more severe. Angry and frustrated constituents call hoping
for relief, but satisfying answers are impossible to offer. Aircraft noise truly
poses a threat to the otherwise outstanding quality of life enjoyed in neighborhoods
surrounding the airport.
How can we respond to this growing problem as elected officials? Certainly we
can insist that airport operating policies and procedures be as noise sensitive as
possible. We should continue to work cooperatively on land -use policies that are
sensible from a development and noise impact standpoint. We must pressure Washington
for reasonable constraints on the burgeoning. airline industry, as well as regulations
requiring the use of newer, quieter aircraft.
Important as these responses are, none address the fundamental problem of noise
levels emitted by the ever - increasing number of flights at Minneapolis -St. Paul
International. We believe, therefore, it is time to begin talking openly about the
growing divergence between the ability of the airport to handle traffic on its runways
and its airspace and the ability of the surrounding environment to sustain higher and
higher levels of noise decibels. The concept of "environmental capacity ", the
monitoring of airport operations and possible noise limits must be inserted directly
into the Airport Commission's future plans. Now is the time to raise this issue as
long -term planning efforts of the MAC are commencing.
You are cordially invited to a meeting of state and local officials to begin
discussing the environmental capacity of Minneapolis -St. Paul International airport.
Senator Mike Freeman will convene the meeting and guide us through the enclosed agenda.
As you can see the proposal offered is two -fold: that MAC agree to study environmental
capacity as part of its long -term plans and that a committee of elected officials be
established to monitor this effort. This is a "bare- bones" recommendation subject to
refinement and modifications by those in attendance.
The meeting is scheduled for Thursday, July 25 at Richfield City Hall, City
Council Chambers starting at 7:30 p.m. If that time is inconvenient for you but
you're interested in the topic, please let us know. Otherwise, we hope to see you on
the 25th to begin this important discussion.
ve Cramer
ouncil Member, Minneapolis
Mark Mahon
Co ilm n, Bloo n7( to
Arthur Seaberg%
State Representative, District 38B
Wes Skoglund
Sta Representative, District 61B
ennis Schulstad
Council Member, Minneapolis
Connie Morrison
Mayor, Mayor, City of Burnsville
r
i
AGENDA
1. Introductions - Senator Mike Freeman
2. Problem Statement - Council Member Steve Cramer
a. air traffic trends and projections
b. neighborhood impact
c. near -term prospects
d. environmental capacity concept
3. Environmental Capacity; What It Means and How It Should be Studied
- Report by Walter Rockenstein
4. MAC Long -Term Planning Process
5. Proposal
a. study environemntal capacity through MAC long -term
planning process
b. form advisory committee of elected officials on environmental
. capacity planning
MEETING
Thursday, July 25th
7:30 p.m.
Richfield City Hall
6700 Portland Avenue
Eberhardt
July 11, 1985
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
and Council Members
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: The Blake Schools
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We have been employed by the Blake Schools to pursue several options for
school bus exit routes in an attempt to alleviate traffic congestion and
ensure student safety.
After discussions with the cities of Edina and Hopkins, Blake hosted a meeting
for concerned neighbors at the Hopkins campus July 10, 1985. We have
determined that the best option for both -Blake and the neighborhood would be
to route school bus traffic out the southwest corner of the parking lot, onto
the vacated streetcar right-of-way, exiting onto Second Street South (see
map) .
Edina and Hopkins each own a portion of the streetcar right-of-way. The
distance from the parking lot to the street is approximately one tenth of a
mile. Currently, it is being used as a-bike path.
The Blake Schools respectfully request permission to widen that portion of the
streetcar right- of-way mentioned above to acccmmodate one -way bus traffic
leaving the Hopkins campus at 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday.
The Blake Schools would monitor the use of this exit by putting a gate at the
street exit, and locking the gate at all times other than 8:30 a.m. and 3:30
p.m. Further, Blake is willing to improve the path at its own expense,
maintain it throughout the school year and after one year hold another meeting
with the neighbors. If, after one year, the neighbors are opposed to
continuation of Blake's use of this path, Blake will honor their wishes.
3250 West 66th Street
P.O. Box 1385
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
612/920 -9280
The Blake Schools want to solve this traffic and safety problem with a miniu m,
of disruption to the neighborhood. If the City Councils approve this request,
Blake would like to complete the path - widening before the 1985 school year
begins, September 3, 1985.
Thank you very much for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Marlys J. Can r, Associate
Consulting Services
feo
cc: John Stander
7
i
lqmllsm Rai
■l a
I4
I;
_ M
C
I � SCWOOL
� SSSS�_ SS1
tl.7SS�SSSS �_
211 - -
•I 'lili
I•
i
- 0L All (
SC WOOL
I �%/
hmmm
n���i��� No
on
_� �� ■ ■■ m ■■ ■� ■
SSA SSS1 SSSS SSA M SSf S�
_ -- _ -_- -- _ -- ■ ■■ ■ i■ mum=
SSA � SSA � SS�S� SSf SS ■ ■ ■I - - -_ -„ „
' I ,
July 11, 1985 i
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
and Council
Membe rs
4801 W. 50th Street I
.; '.Edina, MN 55424
Re: The Blake Schools
Dear Mayor and Council Members. I
We have been employed by the Blake Schools to pursue several options for
'school bus exit routes in an attempt to alleviate traffic congestion and
ensure student safety.
After discussions with the cities of Edina and Hopkins, Blake hosted a meeting
for concerned neighbors at the Hopkins campus July 10, 1985. We have
determined that the best option for both.Blake and the neighborhood would be
to route school bus traffic out the southwest corner of the parking lot, onto
the vacated streetcar right -of -way, exiting onto Second Street South (see
I map)
Edina and Hopkins each own a portion of the streetcar right -of -way. The
distance from the parking lot to the street is approximately one tenth of a
mile. Currently, it is being used as a bike path
r. I 1
The Blake Schools respectfully request permission to widen that portion of the
;streetcar right- of-way mentioned above to accommodate one -way bus traffic
leaving the Hopkins campus at 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. "I
The Blake Schools would monitor the use of this exit by putting a gate at the
.street exit, and locking the gate at all times other than 8:30 a.m, and 3:30
p.m. Further, Blake is willing to improve the path at its awn expense,
maintain it throughout the school year and after one year hold another meeting
with the neighbors. If, after one year, the neighbors are opposed to
continuation of Blake's use of this path, Blake will honor their wishes.
i
3250 West 66th Street
P.O. Box 1385
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
612/920 -9280
L
The Blake Schools want to solve this traffic and safety problem with a minim=
of disruption to the neighborhood. If the City Councils approve this request,
\ V
G�
N,
o'
3 3TRCET SOUTH
I
Q-7--T I
SOUTH
4�
cy
I+
l:
r
+0
Kt
MARLEY
"OPKIMS
SC NOOK
— _2IAK[
SCHOOL
� _�� �, -- ■- -- IIIIIIIIII'- 11111111111
� -- ��. 11 ■- 11 ■- ■■ ■1111 -
14EMORANDUM
TO: COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: C. WAYNE COURTNEY, MAYOR
SUBJECT: BOARD /COM11ISSION APPOINTMENTS
DATE: July 12, 1985
The following persons have contacted me regarding being considered for
appointments:
Walter Sandison
4612 W. 58th Street
Edina, MN 55424
926 -6292
Frederick Green
4404 42nd Street W.
Edina, MN 55416
.(H) 920 -4909
(0) 370 -3746
C. A. Stuppy
4624 Concord Terrace
Edina, MN 55424
926 -8385
Paul A. Gens
4510 Arden Avenue
Edina, MN 55424
925 -9669
r
Planning Commission or Board of Appeals & Adj.
20 years in Edina - retired - Worked for New York
Continental Insurance
Planning Commission or Board of Appeals & Adj.
2 years in Edina - First National Bank Minneapolis
Corporate Banking
Willing to serve on any Board /Commission or Foundation
Willing to serve in any capacity
Frederick T. Green
4404 Hest 42nd St.
July 12, 1985
Edina City Council
Edina City Hall
4801 Hest 50th St.
Re: Openings on City Commissions
Dear Council Members,
Please accept my name for consideration to appointment on one of the
following City commissions: Planning Commission (preference) or Appeals
Board.
My interest in serving on a City commission is two —fold. First, I have a
willingness and sincere interest in being active in my community and
performing public service. Secondly, it will enhance my working knowledge
of our City government.
Most importantly, I believe my finance background and previous experience
in public service will prove to be valuable to the City of Edina on either
commission. Below is a brief summary of my professional and service
experience.
PROFESSIONAL:
1982 to Present: First National Bank of Minneapolis, Assistant Vice
President. Currently in the Corporate Banking Group. One of two people
who develop, construct and finance activites in Renewable Energy.
Specifically in the areas of wind, cogeneration and mass burn. Prior to
moving to the Corporate Banking Group in late 1984, I was in the
Agri— Bussiness /Commodities Group. Activities included commercial lending
to agricultural processors, commodity trading companies and the securities
industry
1977 to 1982: Brenton. Bank and Trust Company, Vice President, Clarion,
Iowa. Responsibilities included direct production lending to farmers,
commercial lending to local business people, real estate lending for
purchase of homes and consumer lending to customers for various other
needs.
Page 2
F. Green
PUBLIC SERVICE:
I am currently a member of the Citizens Leaugue. While living in Clarion,
Iowa, I served as President of the Jaycees, Secretary — Treasurer of the
Lions and a member of the Board of Trustees of our church.
Feel free to contact the following individuals for both personal and
professional references:
Martin Cooney Frank Zeigler
Vice President Vice President
Corporate Banking Group Agri — Business /Commodities Div.
First Bank Mpls. First Bank Mpls.
(612) 370 -4859 (612) 370 -4141
If, further information is needed, I can be reached at 370 -3746 (W) or
920 -4909 (H). I am confident I can perform the tasks neccessary to carry
out the duties of an appointee to a City commission and am willing to
commit the time to do so. I look forward to hearing from the City
Council.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Frederick
T. Green
7
WILLIAM A. VENELL
4614 DREXEL AVENUE
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
-1: - F
July 12, 1985
I'layor C. Wayne Courtney
Edina City I-fall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, 11 55424
Dear rx. Courtney:
I would like to recommend Terri Albinson to you for
either the position on the Edina Foundation or the Mina
Planning and Development Board.
While I was Administrator at Colonial Church, I had
ample opportunity to observe Terri's organizational and
administrative skills as-she chaired the annual stewardship
drive for two years and served on numerous boards including
Trustees. At that time, Colonial's budget exceeded one
million dollars.
Terri is enthusiastic and personable and engenders
enthusiastic participation from others. Please give her
every consideration.
Very sine rely yours,
7
,f
LANG, PAULY & GREGERSON, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ROBERT I. LANG
ROGER A. PAULY
DAVID H. GREGERSON
RICHARD F. ROSOW
MARK J. JOHNSON
JOSEPH A. NILAN
JOHN W. LANG
DIANA P. MASSIE
Mayor Wayne Courtney
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney:
4108 IDS CENTER
80 SOUTH EIGHTH STREET
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE: (612) 338 -0755
July 12, 1985
I would like to submit my name for consideration for appoint-
ment to the Community Development and Planning Commission as a first
choice and the Board of Appeals and Adjustments as a second choice.
For the past 8' years I have been actively involved in municipal law
through the representation of various municipal entities. I feel
that the experience I have gained in my practice would be beneficial
to the City on either the Community Development and Planning Com-
mission or the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. I would like to
be more active in my community and would enjoy being of service on
either of these bodies.
Jerre Miller (938- 7635) informed me he would be happy to serve
as a reference.
Thank you for your consideration.
Very truly yours,
1 >
Ri hard F. Rosow
RFR /flc:si
y
Terrill K. fllbinson
5 5620 i'ooddale So.
L• dina, IvIn. 55424
July 12,1985
C. '7ayne Courtney, Mayor
Edina City Hall
4801 !V. 50th Street
Edina, gin.
Dear Mayor Courtney,
I am sending this letter in reply to the article that
appeared in the Edina Sun this week, mentioning that
there are sveral openings on City Commissions.
Enclosed is my resume. I interested in serving on the
Edina Foundation.
Yours truly,
t
Terrill Albinson
Would be willing to serve in another capacity. _
Terrill Y. Albinson
5620 ':'fooddale So.
Edina, Mn. 55L,24
920 -5849
OBJECTIVE: Community service
EXP.FRIENCE: Organized Grt Shows for Colonial Church of
Edina,6years
Stewardship Committee,Colonial Church of
Edina,chaired 2 years. Sat on the committee
5 years.
Publicity Chair for the "Smuckler House
Tour ", Friends of the Institute. One year
Building and Design Committee for Colonial
Church of Edina. 4 years.
United Church of Christ OC?,.TM State Steward-
ship Board. One year.
Board of Trustees, Colonial Church of Edina
3 years.
V4unteer at Fairview Southdale Hospital.
2 years.
OTHPR FACTORS: Married with 4 children. Homemaker. Our
family has been a resident of �Tdina for 19
years. Attended University of California,
Santa Barbara and the `Minneapolis School of
Art end Design. Exhibited and sold work.
Having lived and raised a family in such a
fine community - .s-Edina, I am interested in
serving the community.
PERSONAL REFFREN CE:
William Venell
4614 Drexel Ave.
Edina
922 -4394
At
July 11, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
Mayor Courtney:
I am writing in regard to the current opening on the Community Development
and Planning Commission. I wish my name to be submitted for consideration
of appointment tothat Commission.
My interest in serving in this capacity is both personal and professional.
My personal interest arises from the fact that I was born and raised in
Edina and lived in the community until I was 17. I left to attend school
and pursue professional goals. In 1983 I purchased the "family homestead"
and returned as an Edina resident. Because of my many years as a member
of the community, I have great interest in its future development.
My professional background is in the area of social services. I obtained
my MSW in 1976 and have postgraduate coursework in family systems. The
past eight years I have worked in Child Protective Services, and am cur-
rently a supervisor in Hennepin County Child Protective Services. The
focus of my professional work.has been family systems and their interaction
with the community. A natural extension of this is community development.
I would very much like to be involved with the Planning and Development
Commission. If you have any questions or require additional information,
please contact me at the numbers listed below. Thank you for your time
and attention in consideration of this request.
Since , lyy,,,
Kathleen A. Knutson
5445 York Ave. So.
Edina, MN. 55410
926 -5284 - home
348 -6730 - work
KAK:da
Kathleen Ann Knutson, ACSW Date of birth: 10 -23 -51
5545 York Ave. So.
Edina, MN 55410
Home phone: 926 -5284
Work phone: 348 -6730
Education
1969 -1970 Gustavus Adolphus College - St. Peter, MN
Major: Sociology Manor: Psychology
1970 -1972 Augsburg College, Minneapolis, MN
Major: Social Work Minor: Psychology - Graduated cum laude
1974 -1976 University of Minnesota - Minneapolis
Graduate School MSW
1978 -1979 University of Minnesota and the Department of Public Welfare
Treatment of Family Sexual Abuse - Three training days per month.
Post- graduate study
Experience
December 1980 - present Social Work Unit Supervisor - Hennepin County
Child Protection. Clinical supervision of
seven direct service social workers. Program
development in the areas of family sexual abuse
and out -of -home placement of children.
January 1982 - July 1982 Therapist - First Step, Inc., Part time position
with outpatient chemical dependency program.
Individual and marriage counseling.
March 1980 - June, 1982 Field Instructor, University of Minnesota,
Clinical supervision of graduate and under-
graduate students in Child Protection Services.
August 1979 - December 1980 Principal Social Worker - Hennepin County Child
Protection. Direct service with physically and
sexually abusive families.
March 1977 - August 1979 Social Work III, Child Protection Unit, Anoka
County Welfare Department. Direct service with
physically and sexually abusive families.
June 1975 - June 1976 Payment Counselor, Hennepin County Welfare Department
September 1976 - March 1977 Counseling in child support and visitation.
July 1973 - September 1975 Eligibility Technician, Hennepin County Food Stamp
Center. Interviewing and certification for food
stamps.
References
References and additional information furnished upon request.
V31�,S
Gr
July 1, 1985
Edina City Council
Dear Edina City Council Members,
We, Sheryl L. and David M. Waterman of 3800 West 55th Street, request
that the Edina City Council.allow us to pay the water connection
charge from main # 335 to our house(The West z of Lot 5, Block 3, and
the East 30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury Park near Lake Harriet,
State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, and City of Edina), over
a period of 6 years at the interest rate applicable to such matters.
This connection to city water in the amount of $2645.62. will replace
our current water source, a private well.
Sincerely,
David M. Waterman
,6kq (DI YV GM�✓��
Sheryl L. Waterman
3800 West 55th St.
Edina, Mn 55410
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members ) /
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: EXCESS UMBRELLA COVERAGE
DATE: July 12, 1985
We have been successful in obtaining a quote for an Umbrella Insurance
policy. The level of coverage would be $1,000,000 (one million dollars).
The cost would be $77,000, plus an additional $20,000 to bring the
Police liability up to $1,000,000.
The major condition that the City would be required to meet in order to
purchase the additional coverage is to bring all our underlying coverage
for our liability insurance up to $1,000,000. I had staff work with Home
Insurance Company to provide a quote as to what this additional coverage
would cost. The quotation we received for this amount of coverage is
$82,000.
The net result is that in order for the City to purchase $1,000,000 umbrella,
the final cost would be $179,000. Staff is not recommending this option.
Rather, we think that because our present level of coverage does not bring
us up to the liability cap set by the State of 200,000/600,000 (.City's current
coverage limits are 500,000) we should bring our level of coverage up to
1,000,000 from the Home Insurance Company and not purchase the excess
umbrella coverage at all. The cost to the City would be $82,000 and would
put our level of liability coverage in,excess of the State cap.
0--r
TO: Mayor and City Council FRFROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Enginee 41�1
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report, Set Hearing Date (8 -5 -85)
The following improvements have been investigated and it has been
determined that they are feasible and their construction would be
in the best interest of the overall development of the City of Edina:
IMPROVEMENT AND LOCATION
P -BA -262
Street & Bridge Replacement
W. 44th Street - Hwy. 100 to Soo Line R.R.
Project previously approved, need reconfirmation
prior to bid opening)
P -S -34
Sidewalk Repair - Various Locations in City
(primarily Country Club area)
(Last major independent sidewalk repair project
was 1967)
FJH:lm
ESTIMATED COST
$323,404.87
$133,172.89
GLENN G.NYBECK
GORDON V.JOHNSON
JOHN K. BOUOUET
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
MARK G. OHNSTAD
DONALD D. SMITH
DENNIS M. PATRICK
MARSH J. HALBERG
MARK E. LASEE
JOHN R. PRAETORIUS
l�
THOMSEN, NYBECK,JOHNSON, BOUOUET & VAN VALKEN BURG, P.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 102 -7250 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS I EDINA), MINNESOTA 55435
16121 635 -7000 OF COUNSEL
HELGE THOMSEN
RICHARD D.WILSON,P.A.
JACK W. CARLSON
ROBERT E. 2ECK
July 11, 1985
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ken:
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
Members of the City Council
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Edina Prosecution
You and I have talked off and on about the legal fees and
expenses in connection with the prosecution work and I wanted to
set out some thoughts here.for discussion with you, and the
Council.
When we think of cases to be prosecuted we usually think
of DWI's. Actually, we should include items such as assault, shop-
lifting, bad checks, felonies that the Hennepin County Attorney re-
fuses to prosecute, zoning violations, all traffic violations, and
other similar matters.
Recently we have received a report from the Hennepin County
Court which, among other things, has a great number of statistics.
That report is aimed at trying to redraw the lines between the various
court divisions. I can see that if some of them take place that is
going to create more travel time and more delay in waiting for other
cities to proceed with their hearings while we are at the court.
However, I would like to attach a few of those statistics
for your review. Accordingly I am attaching as exhibits:
- Mr. Kenneth
E. Rosland
-2-
July
11,
1985
A.
Citations issued
by Police Department -
1984
(pg.
19)
Bloomington 12,962
Edina 12,243
Eden Prairie 4,499
Richfield 6,185
St. Louis Park 12,020
B. Total revenue collected by Hennepin County
. Municipal Courts sentences - 1984 (pg. 22)
Bloomington $479,010
Edina 370,918
Eden Prairie 222,284
Richfield 212,392
St. Louis Park 510,007
C. DWI's reported in Hennepin County Communities -
1983 - (pg. 25).
Bloomington 432
Edina 280
Eden Prairie 282
Richfield 269
St. Louis Park 736
In 1983 Edina had 280 DWI's.
In 1984 Edina had 348.
Through March 31, 1985 Edina had 130 for a yearly
estimate of 520. (usually the second half is greater.
In 1984 61% were in the second half).
In the first quarter of 1985 we had the same number of
DWI's as in the first half of 1984.
D. Next, I am enclosing an analysis of the Court fibes
received by the City of Edina by month for the years 1982, 1:983 and
1984. This was prepared by Edina's Finance Department. They list
the "Court Costs" as an expense. I assume that refers to jail, witness
fees and the like. We look at a different type of Court Costs and I
will discuss that below. Quite frankly I am not certain where that
appears in the calculations prepared by the City and those prepared
by the County, but the figure "Fines" does in fact include the Court
awarded costs.
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland -3-
July 11, 1985
Next, I wish to include some schedules regarding the following
for Edina.
E. Jury trials. 1984 and 1985 (168).
F. Arraignments from November, 1984 to May, 1985 (1066).
. G. Pre - Trials, November, 1984 to April, 1985 (24).
H. Court trials, November, 1984 through April, 1985.
I. Revocation hearings, November and December, 1984
and March, 1985..
J. Table showing the Court costs assessed against the
various defendants.
I. Article from Edina Sun of June 6, 1985.
COMPARATIVE FEES: It is our understanding that the following
are some of the costs paid by our neighboring communities for attorneys
fees in these matters..
I. Eden Prairie: Approximately $5,000 per month for 4500
citations in a year as opposed to Edina's 12,000 citations.
2. Bloomington has twice the population of Edina and yet we
issued approximately the same number of tickets. Bloomington
has three full time prosecutors and two and a quarter
secretaries. This budget includes $123,289 for attorneys
services and that does not include utilities, insurance,
mileage, meetings and conferences, copy machine etc., of
$43,707 for the Legal Department. We are doing this work
with approximately 1i attorneys, a paralegal who spends
1/3 to 112 of her time on this, and one secretary who
spends about 3 /4ths of her time on prosecution.
3. Richfield: We understand that their charges have been
running between $70,000 and $100,000 a year, and, of course,
their volume is no where near that of Edina.
4. St. Louis Park: I do not have that information now.
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland -4-
July 11, 1985
OTHER: Other things that we do as a part of our services are to
attend seminars. We teach seminars and classes such as the annual Edina Mer-
chants Seminar on theft /bad checks and credit card fraud. We also meet with
various security officers for Southdale and have conducted training sessions
for Edina Officers. We attend prosecution seminars to stay current on law
changes. We have also ridden with Edina Police Officers on their late night
shifts when most of the DWI activity occurs. There has not been any charge
by our office to the City for these legal services.
We render opinions and forward to the Police Department copies of
recent cases that are of importance to them. We are asked for opinion letters
or a procedural way of handling specific types of matters in light of recent
cases, and those have been enthusiastically received by the Police Department.
It is my understanding that when we started,these types of things usually
came second hand from other Police Departments after some 6 to 8 months. That
is not good service and we have attempted to make it current and answer
inquiries promptly.
John Praetorius and Marsh Halberg are very cost conscious
in seeking reimbursement for the City through the levying of Court
costs and fines. Some cases are compromised and yet costs are assessed.
We believe our efforts in this area have shown an increase in the fines
and costs levied on behalf of Edina despite the fact that a trend is
occurring in sentencing by judges where they sentence defendants to
provide free community service rather than imposing heavy fines (See B).
No matter how efficient our office attempts to run our prose-
cution work, we are greatly hindered by the reality of attempting to be
efficient within an inefficient judicial system. When you handle the large
volume of cases which we must, and then funnel that through this ineffi-
cient system, the time involved is quite substantial.
An example of the time and potential delay is set out in Exhibit
1, -
By way of example, it is not uncommon for us to handle 100
separate charges on an arraignment calendar. This may involve 100
separate defendants, perhaps 25 of whom will have retained separate
counsel. Many of those defendants and /or their counsel wish to discuss
their case with us and argue legal issues, make motions, and then appear
before the one judge who is sitting on the bench that day. The problems
with such a system are evident. On May 28, 1985 we had 142 charges to
process.
Many of the variables within prosecution work are not controllable
by the prosecutor. For example, a judge may call and order our appearance
before him downtown on a case. Secondly many cases are rescheduled due
to time conflicts with other cases.
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland -5-
July 11, 1985
Personalities involved in the court system also have a great
effect upon how efficiently the system may run. You may have a court
date when the judge presiding on the bench has a reputation within the
defense community as being too harsh. Defendants will not negotiate on
those dates despite any offer we may make. This "judge shopping" means
that defendants will wait until a future court appearance to seek disposi-
tion of their case. Thus we have two appearances instead of one.
We have made efforts to keep our system as streamlined as
Possible. The complaints which charge defendants with a crime are
primarily dictated by our paralegal at a cheaper rate than either John
or Marsh. These complaints are put on our word processor where changes
can be made easily. If a case involves numerous defendants from the
same incident the same complaint can then be re -used with different
names being inserted.
Several examples of work done by our support staff involve
keeping on file and organizing all ongoing cases. Defense attorneys
and defendants will contact us for copies of all reports concerning
their case which we are required to provide under statute. We charge
$5.00 for this report to help compensate the City.
Another example involves our need to prove a defendant has
prior convictions as an element of his new case. This can be a lengthy
process in which our support staff must contact the State of Minnesota
to track down the counties in which the prior convictions occurred.
Then we must contact the clerk of court in that county to obtain cert-
fied copies of their records.
Between April, 1982 and January, 1983 budget cutting moves
were taken by the State whereby increased responsibility was delegated
to the City for the cost and enforcement of state laws. There are four
designations of criminal offenses in Minnesota. In order of the least
severe to the most severe they are:
1. Petty misdemeanors.
2. Misdemeanors (first
violations).
3. Gross misdemeanors
police officer);
4. Felonies (forgery,
(parking tickets, speeding tickets).
time DWI's, assaults, ordinance
(repeat DWI
and
burglary).
offenders, fleeing a
1
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland -6- July 11, 1985
Not only has the shifting of prosecuting gross misdemeanors to
the City (since 1983) increased the case load by approximately 100
cases per year, these gross misdemeanors involve a very involved, time
consuming process. (see Exhibit Q. As they are a more serious offense
than most, they are more likely to be fought by defendants as they have
more to lose. (A gross misdemeanor may involve a maximum sentence of
up to $3,000.00 fine and one year in jail).
The procedure for handling a gross misdemeanor case is the same
as for a felony case by the county attorney's office. Typically, a gross
misdemeanor defendant is held in custody in the county jail downtown,'and
we are required to draft a formal complaint charging that defendant within
36 hours of his incarceration (not counting the date of arrest or Sundays).
This obviously requires our prompt attention to those cases. We must
coordinate with the Edina police who must also sign the complaint before
a judge and we have it delivered downtown in time for the first court
appearance. There are also more involved notice procedures and rules
of discovery in these types of cases.
Without attempting to degrade the quality of work performed by
the county attorney's office on felony cases.there is a general feeling
in all communities that the county prosecutors may be slow to respond or
will fail to prosecute cases which they should handle (felonies). As
such, some of these cases have to come to our office if there is to be
any protection for Edina citizens. A classic example occurred recently
when the county failed to prosecute several individuals who were forging
checks to themselves from the bank account of a 97 year old blind Edina
resident. This is a felony charge of forgery, but as the county would not
prosecute it, it came to us to handle for prosecution as a theft charge
by unauthorized use of a checking account.
TO REDUCE COSTS IN EDINA EITHER SET:
1. Higher minimums of what we prosecute, or have
2. Less zealous enforcement by Police, Health, and
Planning to reduce the case volume.
Neither of these sound acceptable per se, but should be discussed.
We have two very qualified attorneys working cooperatively to
back up the police and other departments. When those departments get that
backing they are more diligent.
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland -7- July 11, 1985
As we know from other legal work, qualified and complete legal
representation is expensive - but it is essential that these matters
be handled properly for the residents and departments involved.
It would also help if when a problem in these areas is referred
to the city attorney, as often happens, that we be kept advised and often
the referral should be to Marsh and John rather than to the city attorney
to keep the system more efficient and less expensive.
It is not wise to train, educate and maintain the police force if
the prosecution just lets cases slide by once they go to court. We need
thorough prosecution to support police and give citizens quality protection
and service.
When I sat on the Edina Council we were concerned with the fact
that Edina was not getting complete enforcement. The community and the
Council want a thorough and complete enforcement team. Halfway is not
good enough. The costs for this program have been underestimated. The
team is working. The volume has increased. The time needed has expanded.
The fines are up and the cost is up.
I will appear at the Edina Council meeting on July 15, 1985 and
will be happy to expand or discuss any questions raised.
JVV:jd
Encl.
CITATIONS ISSUED BY POLICE DEPARTMENTS*
COMMUNITY
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
Bloomington
13,880
171p574
16,298
159961
12,905
42,962
Brooklyn Center
51766
6,947
59899
69383
51,483
5,464
► Brooklyn Park
49663
41945
49513
59770
79251
69512
Champlin
749
921
913
568
670
657
Corcoran
74
100
106
108
106
189
Crystal
51241
49878
59693
59453
49349
89032
Dayton (part)
183
113
56
172
18
107
Deephaven /Woodland
19762
1,971
2,037
19655
1,953
1,765
'Vden Prairie
29702
29648
21545
49337
39595
.1.4,499
Edina
12,412
139945
129332
139166
12,045
12,243
Excelsior /Greenwood/
2,591
29871
59434
59900
59677
6,051
Shorewood /Tonka Bay
Golden Valley
89590
89036
79434
79727
59964
4,802
Greenfield
6
19
42
59
26
31
Hanover (part)
1
1
1
0
NA
Hassan Twp
NA
NA
NA
50
0
NA
Hopkins
59278
4,899
49709
5,217
49063
51095
Independence/
19169
19174
11311
1,422
19737
1,773
Maple Plain
Maple Grove
19529
1,449
1,427
29773
1,663
19351
Medicine Lake
77
4
1
2
1
NA
Medina /Loretto
283
438
490
946
19621
2,379
*Minneapolis/
4309701
4019290
4199749
4519188
4581460
474,660
Ft. Snelling/St. Anthony
Minnetonka
79138
71802
51064
51836
69230
6,177
Minnetrista
Mound
Mound
916
872
19116
19632
Mound
3,424
51087
29887 **
3,278
3,189
3,393
New Hope
59371
5,221
59489
6,858
6,421
6,063
Orono /Mtka Beach /
19523
1,906
2,541
19909
1,886
19961
Long Lake
_
Osseo
607
888
639
727
654
578
Plymouth
6,448
5,922
69895
71567
89347
9,182
a=#tichfield
61130
89519
5,358
5,211
5,448
"StI85
Robbinsdale
89327
69168
59535
5,058
7,245
51026
Rockford (part)
4
1
2
2
0
NA
Rogers
16
6
6
176
9
3
St. Bonifacius
Mound
Mound
Minnetri
Minnetri
Minnetri
Minnetri
`St. Low Park
11,157
109498
99847
9,242
109131
='12902D
Spring Park
Mound
Mound
Orono
Orono
Orono
Orono
Wayzata
832
10728
29575
29510
29588
2,024
* Minneapolis includes citations issued by the Minneapolis Park Board, University of Minnesota,
Game do Fish (or DNR), State Security, Building Inspections, Meter Monitors, Park Reserve
District, Fort Snelling, St. Anthony, and the Metropolitan Airport Commission.
** The lower figure shows that St. Bonifacius, and Minnetrista are recorded under Minnetrista as of
1981.
TABLE 1.0
TOTAL REVENUE COLLECTED BY THE HENNEPIN COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT*
(The municipalites receive the
greater portion of the total
revenues collected.)
MUNICIPALITY
1980**
1984 **
$loomington
$ 3769053.00
$ _ *79,010.00
Brooklyn Center
124,670.00
183,589.00
Brooklyn Park
1249575.00
2829899.00
Champlin
16,069.00
269394.00
Chanhassen (part)
220.00
5.00
Corcoran
12, 221.00
32,006.00
Crystal
112,351.00
247,272.00
Dayton
99224.00
20, 388.41
Deephaven
329890.00
42,074.00
EAftn Prairie
809195.75
2229284.00
Edina
234,808.00
370,918.00
Excelsior
239566.00
879906,48
Golden Valley
1739592.00
199,721.00
Greenfield
41843.00
13,460.00
Greenwood
39111.00
119815.00
Hanover (part)
906.00
31239.00
Hassan Twp
NA
NA
Hopkins
87,566.00
148,968.47
Independence
14,145.00
36,339.00
Long Lake
99075.00
11,538.00
Loretto
1, 553.00
2v341.00
Maple Grove
31,989.00
749566.00
Maple Plain
21, 937.00
329719.00
Medicine Lake
19347.00
NA
Minneapolis
39413,500.00.
6,350,626.00
Minnetonka
175,645.00
267,382.00
Minnetonka Beach
29359.00
2,853.00
Minnetrista
10,675.00
33,031.72
Mound
479467.00
999210.00
New Hope
1051188.00
220,035.00
Orono
24,129.00
489230.00
Osseo
12,820.00
26,867.00
Plymouth
1579104.50
3639355.00
4tichiield
198,747.00
=,212, 392.00
Robbinsdale
95, 867.00
149,691.00
Rockford (part)
829.00
NA
Rogers
69580.00
149257.00
St. Anthony (part)
21p333.00
69,063.00
St. Bonifacius
49125.00
16,042.00
gSt. Louis Park
2569522.00
-:310,007.00
Shorewood
15,249.00
62,538.00
Spring Park
259278.00
9,456.00
Tonka Bay
6,448.00
389631.00
Wayzata
269067.00
649641.30.
Woodland
662.00
19395.00
* Data complied from Hennepin
County Municipal Court computer files.
** Data does not include fines collected from civil cases, conciliation court fines
and unlawful detainers; nor does
it include bail.
TABLE 2.0
-22-
r r2 '/
DWPS REPORTED IN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITIES 1983*
(Rank Order)
COURT DIVISION
DWPS ** PERCENT
PER DIVISION
DIVISION I (MINNEAPOLIS)
Minneapolis
1 ' 834
St. Anthony
84
Henn. Co. Sheriff
63
U. of M.
1
TOTAL:
1,982 26%
DIVISION 9 (BROOKDALE)
Brooklyn Park
799
New Hope
410
Golden Valley
285
Crystal
209
Robbinsdale
208
Brooklyn Center
107
Maple Grove
122
Osseo
41
Champlin
37
Corcoran
15
Dayton
8
TOTAL:
29241 29%
DIVISION III (RIDGEDALE)
St. Louis Park
736
Minnetonka /Mtka Beach /So. Lake Mtka
487
Plymouth
407
Hopkins
221
Medina
141
Mound
70
Orano
69
Wayzata
54
Minnetrista /St. Bonifacius
44
West Hennepin
39
Deephaven /Woodland
34
Long Lake
15
Spring Park
9
TOTAL:
20326 29%
DIVISION IV (SOUTHDALE)
Bloomington
432
Eden Prairie
282
CEdina
- '. 280
Richfield
269
TOTAL:
1,263 16915
* Hennepin County Office of Planning and Development,
"Crime Analysis 1983; p. 87.
** Does not include DWPS for Minnesota Highway Patrol.
TABLE 3.1
� q
= i �
lowl
1�:o
■v=:�
■WI�� ■I ■�II�II ■'9
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total:
January
February
March
April
1984 JURY TRIALS
(Approximately)
1985-JURY TRIALS
7
7
10
7
15
8
13
15
19
11
12
9
133
10
9
8
8
1
- November - 1984
11/05/84
- 1 - 1
11/06/84
- 1 - 1
11/07/84
- 3 - 0
11/19/84
- 1 - 0
11/21/84 -
1 - 0
11/23/84 -
3 --0
Total: 10 - 2
December - 1984
12/19/84 - 1 - 0
12/20/84 - 1 - 0
12/20/84 - 5 - 1
12/21/84 - 2 - 0
-Total: 9 - 1
January - 1985
01/17/85 - 2 - 0
01/18/85 - 1 - 0
01/31/85 - 3 - 0
01/30/85 - 4 - 0
4otal: 10 - 0
February - 1985
02/11/85
- 2 - 0
02/12/85
- 1 - 0
02/25/85
- 1 - 0
02/26/85
- 3 - 0
02/28/85
- 2 - 0
,Total: 9 - 0
JURY TRIALS
March - 1985
03/12/85
- 1 - 0
03/01/85
- 2 - 0
03/11/85
- 2 - 0
03/14/85 -
1 - 0
03/26/85 --2
- 0
Total: 8 - 0
April -.1985
04/08/85 - 4 - 0
04/22/85 - 2 - 0
04/23/85 - 1 - 0
04/26/85 - 1 - 0
,`Total • 8 - 0
May - 1985
05/07/85 - 1 - 0
November - 1984
11/05/84 - 42
11/15/84 - 40
11/19/84 - 44
11/26/84 - 44
Total: 170
,December - 1984
12/03/84
- 33
12/04/84
- 1
12/10/84
- 50
12/18/84
- 1
12/19/84
- 37
12/24/84 -
27
Total: 149
January - 1985
01/02/85
- 29
01/07/85
- 54
01/14/85 -
32
01/21/85 -
38
01/29/85 -
36
Total• 189
february - 1985
02/04/85 - 40
02/11/85 - 25
02/19/85 - 31
02/26/85 - 1
02/25/85 - 39
Aotal: 136
March - 1985
03/11/85 - 44
03/18/85 - 43
03/25/85 57
- Total: 144
1
ARRAIGNMENTS
April - 1985
04/01/85
- 51
04/08/85
- 50
04/15/85
- 54
04/22/85
- 47
04/28/85 - 39
Total:
241
:May - 1985
05/06/85 -_35
05/07/85 - 2
l
November - 1984
11/14/85
- 16
11/15/85
- 4
11/27/85 -
16
11/28/85 -
1
11/29/85 -
13
Total• 50
PRETRIALS
April - 1985
04/02/85 - 10
04/01/85 - 4
04/22/85 - 15
04/28/85 - 4
04/30/85 - 17
Total• 50
December
- 1984 May - 1985
01/08/85
12/03/84
- 3
12/10/84
- 2
12/11/84
- 11
15
fTota 1:
16
;January - 1985
01/03/85
- 12
01/08/85
- 11
01/10/85
- 10
01/14/85
- 6
01/21/85 -
15
01/22/85 - 17
dotal •
71
February - 1985
02/05/85 - 16
02/21/85 - 17
-Total: 33
44arch - 1985
03/05/85 - 11
03/07/85 - 10
Total: 21
COURT TRIALS
November - 1984
11/01/84 - 4 - 1
11/05/84 - 5 - 1
11/15/84 - 5 - 2
11/26/84 - 4 - 3
Total: 18 - 7
December - 1984
12/03/84 - 2 - 1
12/19/84 - 5 - 0
dotal: 7 - 1
- January - 1985
01/02/85 - 5 - 1
01/07/85 - 3 - 0
01/24/85 - 6 - 2
-Total: 14 - 3
.-february
- 1985
02/04/85
- 5 - 3
02/19/85
- 5 - 2
Total:
10 - 5
March - 1985
03/18/85 - 4 - 2
Total: 4 - 2
April - 1985
04/01/85 - 4 - 2
04/15/85 - 4 - 2
04/28/85 - 3 - 2
Total: 11 - 6
November - 1984
11/19/84 - 3
December 191
12/10/85 - 1
March - 1985
03/11/85 - 4
Revocation Hearings
COURT COSTS
October 20 - November 20, 1984 $3,285.00
November 20 - December 20, 1984 750.00
December 20 - January 20, 1985 3,115.50
January 20 - February 20, 1985 2,165.00
February 20 - March 20, 1985 1,530.00
March 20 - April 20, 1985 2,085.00
April 20 - May 20, 1985 2,545.00
x
• -••Iti v Mr.i'r{yy1++N�1.Y_Ml.� �:�. . , .., .. ' i•r�rr� • • � .. ��.. � •. �..� +w�.are mays tram towK 80r - -s •u. y1,• ',► •
��.�M -w,,j� „�1,i.�.�•r, 1 �r��j •i�y'1,7,• S ''f�t;' ^Jl.;•S +L•;i :•i`,•p. , ,•.
Y•, ac,
I t r C
„aIi• •fiA1C1 ,i.•, +y ,. ,..f �,,. {1:.'t :! i`••. ,,:. n
��r, ,�� t �;T .: living room Friday mor dng• , ,,, ,•.glass door was ehkattered and
+ Words Busted to about 73 ropes upstairs neighbor's their PIK dewks and books.
"' ``• . - r -hour at the height of the storm i8hbo a roof was gone. Edina building Inspector John
.�1r ,
i!t�► j but Some' people 'heard what' did fa W Police and fire departments Shirmang said everything went.
■ r ti' ,lM►lndows job, Dan O'Brien said the smoothly he
sounded like. a train or a swarm. of next day. About a down firefighters but two of the apps meet ts.
"Tees: sounds of a tornado.
416d .ati . ; 1 'loll 1A a responded to the call. There was no had friends or relatives to 4W with
parttrtents at the COMPies fire and when the roof went; so did after the storm. The Red Cross took
,: * Parklawn • were damaged by .' the electricity. Mother seven police
- + ► >ivind'or water from the subsequent care of the two-who did
;lp ' , : down bsequent ' officers were on the scene and one . place to stay. hgve a �+►
Aft
Pour. The wits! tone'oft about ascot( '
ane•ahltd of': Mot which in otfklal spent this kilght The storm also downed tees in
`. i tatbened intd t e eWtmtieing ppo '� d gr '�ainst looting, .,• ',south Edina and it also turned
� �te�i� r , ► , ... loess Was rotating an usual
..,.•.....�. Ate' . oorhplexf i :•. `1+�k'Ida semaphores on France and York
reidy 7etM""'"° '" •"' ` ' Dan and Lisa +D' y ; morning at National Car avenues, which caused a bit Of' i
rains it pouts, ep�x fond. ••I got home at about 11 and this t� ��� lived wta1: •Winds blew out several confusion . for drivers Thwrsday.
',what I found;'•saki apartment real secord aoor Of, the Wig. ' windows 4n the southeast corner of - night.
Buseh as she stood ha ft for the bgaerrient lrhen tMey, `-r the building and pieces of moot new • As of Monday,
na 1 st a sopq :.war and x. m * *W*i ":f+!+ iive4:�'ha legal dlvfilon of n�1'• the city did ot
o 4 tlWPl -have a y on the amount 1
eck f a time wuh ear>Y 6' , , �.' ,' ,.. ,t l r' '; i�lL ld 'atilt 7 .'damage caused by the stone:
Ae early morufog harts
'Fulford s IM Pontiac
4ana wm stoiskffrom lhi �Dr�n,, iof am family borne. Thm `(very mee 3 lng new i . ..haza �
a con vertlbk,
Y f ed h wm"da �m::
r Pig i me 14+� : . , . asizeDW
s�:s '
SAO
!Was w a. /art: arr�
[ford sald
last week ; " Dr4 hWmmm: e
to 'be �
, l
.►
Baas attar do The pollop [nine M am d'li�ers this *�. �n �� are tlred of pereorte getting kl!)� :au r . ' ,` ;777 r
.,r -IN'
� .nailed.thstr'. jn r+eoor+d egmberd �►� ; Yeah" 'bedaUS061'alcohol," he said. ,
with Heesu,� « No !
'Or a �( ball ! f see atdeperttrtlrtt tr'Bkeke r �„
�t• ° pod eel •flea' pollee drivers arrested in Edina Y eb�tnk nn n '' %r r f • s
C0ov� y ,. . and blows ewer fatal Se o
�,
m. two � � � dtkmlt � � o[ � Plsroerd aver BEd, i�nS,a�hasyf _1 �y.�y ac�ewldents becaum of the . � .
8 news is •`_ �L,ri. Yw. �{,� TZ 1� �. • � crackkdoW OW dMak 01"h •_+d4 /�t�� .%.' ;.1•' . l _L ,. 'irj. ' •
Yet I'�.O.L�� —a moste(Y� ', •I.�fCl t�n� t. �\ 4.ii�.�.h{ ,t!"'�.�'�'.r �rtg
g1R /�J mm an �. �de fold .Wi t crO�lfarld#silgfl g •YID -a T� statistics sat' amasing F.dbta 1 i' f r • � ' "' �, j
)elttnd Nile Lkf-' 'Also' are t 18ft '> s.�redde lgand loo. Policet � have any bars, Swanson said. , • ..JIM ��, ��
rch a few days attar it rlina. tlg H said the �� 11� �''1;:':; ~;' t��' ► ,r r
The bad b Parties aadC����tpa'tks id Edina � � � :fie °�e�won� ve much of..
news t8kft Pollee w effect number of dnmk drivers
ves still have the n•8 sztsohi; iaM Me otfleert! are. way !t' or ve ry becapee of the :►11h1f�' :H a " ' 2, °.'.�" gp *, ti� � t
Idways have the ppoo= ., mtlueooHe ild: "� ge b1 toward thedrunk 'meals. Mritten t �� .� lksve ~6te with tlkeir. = *ilk ,`tL;? { 3r:'i?: ;.i•�,t;, ►�.
e t fAiajtret DruWt DMving ?,;',�'a � ',';
P1dG�d. (MADD) V the nibeteteelltre,pP he'ss vet f �'I1nt>. s evlder><�e of hard drug traffic In Edina, '' i. �' `.'
1 } t' selD,.' -j r w..4ra..� 'i ��^ ! �y Aft Soo" I�LCOC.a' Ins rt . .rl•a�i.'� r , ., ,
he said. :acrd mfg : �, '.'1 :�`'.f�►•,
. k�'1�r r' • BMai�1 et/� +I� rT��. 'tiTj:T;�ii�'�
1'+ .wM1+OnrOMYarr `(�r�jf. f�l�rsry� �• � � nW& Of " Came W the own. !I
Is Imletsd
• \� { �llw1'1'fwV'1-1, \• {•.o+tr�1' tQ 2
-��•� _ - � 1..(.•.1.1.1.,•. .1.1_t.l {, _t'r ► \ ►�♦ '
6 '64!, • . . � r•1.�••.�
-- -.�.. •L \L ►r \Lill, "' ,•. •,
EXHIBIT "L"
Procedure of a file through the Court System
A. Misdemeanor:
Up to $700 and /or 90 days.
First DWI or a prior and plead to lesser charge.
I. Defendant arrested.
2. To Edina Station.
3. Released to sober person
Given court date 2 weeks later.
4. Arraignment - possibilities.
a. Defendant's attorney calls to try and resolve, or
b. Defendant call to try to resolve, or
c. Defendant appears
1) talk and argue
2) plead
a) If plead guilty, to Probation
Officer and we must wait there until
sentencing.
b) If plead not guilty -
Pre -Trial conference date set.
5. Pre -Trial Conference.
A. Attorney calls to discuss - before conference.
1) hearing date.
2) Settle possibility
3) Legal arguments.
B. Conference
Attorneys - meet
If plead guilty, to Probation as above.
6. Trial. If plead not guilty, to jury trial calendar.
A. Interview officers and witnesses.
B. Prepare legal arguments
C. Often many calls by defendant or attorney to
try and resolve - or frankly to stall.
D. 7 trials set a day.
If we are # 3, some judges
require us and witnesses to wait
for hours and then settle - we wait.
Some attorneys stall as long as possible
May be an evidentiary hearing.
EXHIBIT "L"
-2-
Then Trial:
May draw jury, then Judge who also handles
may order us back next day at say 10:30.
We may again wait for hearing while other
arraignments heard.
E. End of Trial:
Some Judges order us to stay until jury
through - has been as late as 9:30 PM.
During waiting time, John and Marsh will dictate summaries of
all cases or arraignments heard; prepare other matters; interview
witnesses; and work.on non criminal matters so that Edina isn't
charged for all of the time there.
THE FUTURE:
A. 1985 Legislature passed new laws re gross misdemeanor assault -
this is primarily domestic abuse.
B. 2 Arraignment days on Jury weeks.
1 Arraignment day on Court weeks.
C. St. Louis Park will be in our Court System.
D. As the Legislature increases fines and emphasis,
there are more trials because of severity of the fines.
it
� 1 `
Sz
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985;
AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF
COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE
THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
I. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and
beneficial for the City to construct improvements to the
municipal golf course consisting of the construction of a
maintenance building, the upgrading of the par 3 golf course
and the construction of an addition to the clubhouse.
This Council further determines that in order to
finance this acquisition and betterment of recreational
facilities for the City of Edina, it is necessary for the City
to issue and sell its General Obligation Golf Course Bonds,
Series 1985 in the principal amount of $1,200,000 (the Golf
Course Bonds) pursuant to.Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter,655, and
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. This Council estimates that
the net revenues derived from the operation of the municipal
liquor stores, in excess of the cost of operation and
maintenance thereof, in the fiscal year which ended
December 31, 1984, equals or exceeds the maximum amount of
principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year
on all of the outstanding Golf Course Bonds of the City, dated
as of December 1, 1963, on all of the outstanding Recreation
Center Bonds, dated as of November 1, 1978 of the City and on
the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 of the City, as proposed.
Prior to the delivery of the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985, to
the purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the
payment of principal and interest on the Golf Course Bonds,
Series 1985. The Council will appropriate and credit to such
fund an amount of revenues of the municipal liquor stores which
is equal to the average annual amount of principal and interest
to become due on the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985.
2. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
475, the City Council of the City does authorize the issuance
and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series
-2-
1985 (the Tax Increment Bonds) in the principal amount of
$12,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment
of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment
project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73,
subdivision 10, to be undertaken in accordance with the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, within a tax increment
financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.73, subdivision 9, previously established by the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina and
approved by the City. The Golf Course Bonds and the Tax
Increment Bonds are hereinafter collectively referred to as the
"Bonds ".
3. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
475.54, subdivision 2, the maturities of the Tax Increment
Bonds are combined with the maturities of the General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, of the City, for
the purpose of compliance with the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.54, subdivision 1.
4. It is hereby determined that this Council shall
meet-at the City Hall at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 19, 1985
to receive, open and consider bids for and award the sale of
the Bonds.
5. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed
to cause notice of the time,.place and purpose of said sale to
be published at least ten days in advance of the bid opening in
a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and
in a periodical published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, giving
financial news and of general circulation throughout the State,
which notice -shall be in substantially the - following form:
-3-
NOTICE OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS,
SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the
City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will meet at the City Hall
in Edina, Minnesota at 7 :00 o'clock P.M. to receive, open and
consider the bids for and award the sale of $12,000,000 General
Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 and $1,200,000
General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 (the Bonds)
of the City. The Golf Course Bonds and the Tax Increment Bonds
will be issued for the purpose of financing the public
redevelopment cost of a redevelopment,project to be undertaken
in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan.
Dated September 1, 1985, the Bonds will mature on January 1 in
the following years and amounts:
$1,200,000 $12,000,000 $13,200,000
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually
on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue
maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and
prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part,
-4-
Golf Course
Tax Increment
Year
Bonds
Bonds
Total
1988
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1989
50,000
$ 150,000
200,000
1990
50,000
150,000
200,000
1991
50,000.
150,000
200,000
1992
50,000
150,000
200,000
1993
100,000
200,000
300,000
1994
100,000
200,000
300,000
1995
100,000
400,000
500,000
1996
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1997
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1998
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
1999
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
2000
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
2001
11000,000
11000,000
2002
11000,000
11000,000
2003
11000,000
1,000,000
2004
11000,000
11000,000
2005
1,050,000
1,050,000
2006
1,050,000
1,050,000
$1,200,000 $12,000,000 $13,200,000
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually
on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue
maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and
prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part,
-4-
in inverse order of maturities of this issue and by lot within
maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and any interest
payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal
amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date
of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to each issue of
the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of
Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and
Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained
from the undersigned.
Dated: July 15, 1985.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Doehn,
City Clerk
-5-
6. The following
conditions for the sale and
Clerk is hereby authorized
terms and conditions to be
to prospective bidders for
shall constitute
issuance of the
and directed to
incorporated in
the Bonds:
the terms and
Bonds, and the City
cause the following
material distributed
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will
meet at 7 :00 o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday,
August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and
award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in
the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by
the City upon the following terms and conditions:
PURPOSE
The Bonds will comprise two issues:
$1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds,
Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961,
Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance
the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf
course; and
$12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985 . to be issued to finance the public redevelopment
cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475.
BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT
AND PAYING AGENT
The City will select a suitable bank or trust company
to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the
Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and
interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and
transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The
City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services.
The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint
a successor.
DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION
The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of
September 1, 1985. The Bonds will be issuable only as fully
registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple
thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check
or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is
-7-
registered at the close of business on the 15th
not a business day) of the month preceding each
payment date, as shown by the register maintain
Registrar. Principal is payable upon surrender
maturity or upon prior redemption at the office
Registrar.
MATURITIES
day (whether or
interest
ad by the
of each Bond at
of the
The Bonds of each issue will mature on January 1 in
the following years and amounts:
Bonds of each issue maturing in 1997 and subsequent
years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the
option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in
inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities, on
January 1, 1996, and any interest payment date thereafter at a
price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus
accrued interest to the date of redemption.
INTEREST
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and
semi - annually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1. All
ME
Golf Course Tax Increment
Year
Bonds
Bonds
Total
1988
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1989
50,000
$ 150,000
200,000
1990
50,000
150,000
200,000
1991
50,000
150,000
200,000
1992
50,000
150,000
200,000
1993
100,000
200,000
300,000
1994
100,000
200,000
300,000
1995
100,000
400,000
500,000
1996
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1997
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1998
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
1999
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
2000
150,000.
900,000
1,050,000
2001
11000,000
11000,000
2002
11000,000
1,000,000
2003
11000,000
1,000,000
2004
11000,000
11000,000
2005
1,050,000
1,050,000
2006
1,050,000
1,050,000
$1,200,000
$12,000,000.
$13,200,000
REDEMPTION
Bonds of each issue maturing in 1997 and subsequent
years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the
option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in
inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities, on
January 1, 1996, and any interest payment date thereafter at a
price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus
accrued interest to the date of redemption.
INTEREST
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and
semi - annually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1. All
ME
Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of
issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be
in an integral multiple of 5 /100 or 1 /8th of 1%, and no rate of
interest or the net effective rate of any issue of Bonds may
exceed the maximum rate to be determined in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 4.
DELIVERY
Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver
to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and
authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must
notify the Registrar, at least 5 business days before delivery
of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be
initially registered and the authorized denominations of the
Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received
by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the
original purchaser and will be issued in denominations
corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the
day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the
opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage
certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in
any manner questioning the validity of the bonds is then
pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City,
threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City
at.its designated depositary on the date of closing in
immediately available funds.
LEGAL OPINIONS
A legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be
provided by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The
legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be printed on the
appropriate Bonds at the request of the purchaser. The legal
opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general
obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their
terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by
State of Minnesota or United States laws relating to
bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights
generally.
TYPE OF BID AND AWARD
Sealed bids for not less than $12,945,000 and accrued
interest on the principal sum of $13,200,000 must be mailed or
delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the
time stated above. No bid may be altered or withdrawn by the
bidder after the time specified above for opening bids. Each
bid must be unconditional and accompanied by a cashier's or
certified check or bank draft in the amount of $264,000,
-9-
payable to the City, to be retained as liquidated damages if
the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith.
The bid offering the lowest net interest cost (total interest
from date of Bonds to stated maturities, less any amount more
than $13,200,000 or plus any amount less than $13,200,000 bid
for principal) will be deemed most favorable. In the event
that two or more bids stated the lowest net cost, the sale of
the Bonds will be awarded by lot. No oral bid and no bid of
less than $12,945,000 for principal, plus accrued interest on
all Bonds will be considered. The City reserves the right to
reject any and all bids, to waive informalities in the bid, and
to adjourn the sale.
CUSIR NUMBERS
The City will assume no obligation for the assignment
or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the
correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit
such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the
purchaser, if the pruchaser waives any extension of the time of
delivery caused thereby.
Information for bidders and bidding forms may be
obtained from the undersigned.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
-10-
7. The City Treasurer - Finance Director, is hereby
authorized and directed to prepare on behalf of the City an
official.statement to be distributed to potential purchasers of
the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 6 hereof
and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and
necessary to adequately describe the City and the security for,
and terms and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
Mayor
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member
and upon vote being
taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted,
signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
-11-
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Due from Other Funds
Contracts Receivable
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Mix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies
FIXED ASSETS:
Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Leasehold Improvements
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Payroll
Due to Other Funds
SURPLUS - Unappropriated
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
As of May 31, 1985
ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
$ 23,244.57
729,769.27
306,735.14
3,035.55
$1,062,784.53
$ (12,306.18)
3,800.00 $ (8,506.18)
12,331.50
34,813.36
$ 390,940.39
308,938.91
79,442.43 779,321.73
$ (2,732.00) -
400.00 (2,332.00)
$ 815,628.41
$ 233,784.60
492, 662.34 570,122.19 803,906.79
TOTAL ASSETS ::$1;619,535.20
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
$ 204,672.93
6,615.74
$ 211,288.67
468.00
$ 211,756.67
1,407,778.53
::$1,619;535.20
OTHER INCOME:
20.67%
20.46%
20.89%
21.08%
19.33%
19.76%
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
18.64
15.69
13.46
Cash Discount
4,258.62
8,008.88
.7,398.90
19,666.40
5,309.32
8,270.43
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
20,963.34
1,296.94*
4.73%
Cash over or under
.68*
252.17*
115.90
136.95*
28.84*
85.51*
CITY OF EDINA
71.54*
65.41
*"
Income on investments
-0-
-0-
-0-
Five Months
Ending May
31,
195 and May
31,
1984
219.55
INCREASE
621.14
1,010.24
502.71
1985
1,466.94*
$
4,487 00 $
7,975 25 $
1984
20,196 60 $
5,901 62 $
9,195.16 $
DECREASE*
23,025.89
50th Street
Yorkdale
NET INCOME $
Grandview
Total
56,597 52 $
50th Street
15,252.93 $
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
$:: 592.18
SALES:
Liquor $
184,825.15
$ 359,331.38
$
346,840.72
$ 890,997.25
$
201,060.90
$
405,114.57
$
366,256.31
$ 972,431.78
$
81,434.53*
Wine
129,130.12
224,579.71
200,737.07
554,446.90
132,24.7.30
241,644.45
203,751.62
577,643.37
23,196.47*
Beer
94,380.68
171,957.11
159,293.28
425,631.07
88,522.76
1749'740.17
152,941.79
- 416,204.72 -
9,426.35
Mix and Miscellaneous
5,816 52
13,017 76
13,082 18
31,916 46
5,674.82
135,440.54
11,712 46
30,827.82
1,088.64
$
414,152.47
$ 768,885.96
$
719,953.25
$1,902,991.68
$
427,505.78
$
834,939.73
$
734,662.18.
$1,9971,107..69''.
$
94,116.01*
Less bottle refunds
9,638 00
21,784 01
21,656 79
53,078 80
10,795 30
269241.08
23,377.08
60,413.46
7,334.66*
N ET SA LES $
4049514.47
$ 747,101.95
$
6989296.46
$1,849,912.88
$
416,710.48
$
808,698.65
$
711,285.10
$13,936,694.23
$
86,781.35*
COST OF SALES:
Inventory - January 1
188,588.68
2319406.39
203,254.82
623,249.89.
175,604.42
2899642.25
237,950.02
- 703,196.69-
79,946.80*
Purchases
359,056 17
649,605 45
610,796 15
1,619,457 77
364,275 25
625,303.44
5519301.05
1,540,879.74
78,578.03
$
547,644.85
$ 881,011.84
$
814,050.97
$2,242,707.66
$
5399879.67
$
914,945.69.
$
789,251.07
$2,244,076.43
- $
1,368.77*
Inventory May 31
232,348 27
288,344 75
258,628 71
779,321 73
211,039 97
262,540.03
218 ,508.48
--692, 088.48
87,233.25
$
315,296 58
$ 592,667 09
$
555,422 26
$1,463,385.93
$
328,839 - -70
$
652, 405.66
$
570,742.59
$1,551,987.95 _
$
88,602.02*
GROSS PRO FI*
89,217.89
$ 154,434.86
$
142,874.20
$ 386,526.95
$
87,870.78
$
156,292.99
$
140,542.51
$ 3849706.28
$
1,820.67
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling
25,691.58
53,738.90
399632.22
119,062.70
289337.50
509369.02
40,517.44
119,223.96
161.26*
Overhead
15,495.37
18,791.18
18,117.37
52,403.92
18,555996
27,584.15
17, 782.23
63,921.44 -
- -
11,517.52*
Administrative
34,231 36
44,666 75
36,261 44
1159159.55
31,626.91
40,107.23
33,347.43
1059081.57
10,077.98
TOTAL OPE RATIN 9
75,418 31
$ 117,196 83
$
94,011 03
$ 286,626 17
$
78,519 47
$
1189060.40
A
91,647.10
$ 288,226.97
$
1,600.80*
EXPENSES
NET OPERATING $
13,799.58
$ 37,238.03
$
48,863.17
$ 99,900.78
$
9,351.31
$
389232.59
$
48,895.41
$ 969479.31
$
39421.47
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
20.67%
20.46%
20.89%
21.08%
19.33%
19.76%
19.86%
18.64
15.69
13.46
Cash Discount
4,258.62
8,008.88
.7,398.90
19,666.40
5,309.32
8,270.43
7,383.59
20,963.34
1,296.94*
4.73%
Cash over or under
.68*
252.17*
115.90
136.95*
28.84*
85.51*
42.81
71.54*
65.41
*"
Income on investments
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
Other
229.06
218.54
219.55
667.15
621.14
1,010.24
502.71
2,134.09
1,466.94*
$
4,487 00 $
7,975 25 $
7,734 35 $
20,196 60 $
5,901 62 $
9,195.16 $
7,929.11 $
23,025.89
$ 2,829.29*
NET INCOME $
18,286 58 $
45,213 28 $
56,597 52 $
120,097 38 $
15,252.93 $
47,427.75 $
56, 824.52 $
119,505.20:
$:: 592.18
PERCENT TO NET SA
Gross profit
Operating expenses
Operating profit
Other income
NETINCOME
22.05%
20.67%
20.46%
20.89%
21.08%
19.33%
19.76%
19.86%
18.64
15.69
13.46
15.49
18.84
14.60
12.88
14.88
3.41%
4.98%
7.00%
5.40%
2.24%
4.73%
6.88%
4.98%...
1.11
1.07
1.10
1.09
1.42
1.14
1.11
1.19
4.52% 6.05% 8.10% 6.49% 3.66% 87% 7.99% 6.17%
1965 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
07 -15 -85 PAGE 1
CHECK N0:—DA—TE— --
*MOU -kT—
196 ^ ^.4
— KCGOURT WO.— IAIY. —IL— P.O.— #-- NESSA6E---- -- -�,1
I-
001-- - - -
- -- — ?TEM— DE &CfiiPTIi3N
196 ^0.3 ?7/03185
53.40
ALSINSON
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 260 -26
- -- - -- 122.45---
_. 53.40
LAUNDRY - - -- ------ -
- -27- 4262 - 661 -66 --
196 0C4 C7/C3/85
110.21
AM °_RICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 440 -44
196^ 4— q7/ 34 85—
196U''4 ^7 `318
— 1- 0—i4t1---
4 ^
lIMERICA.N— LINEN—
-- LAUNORT
10- 4262- 482 -48 — — — aI
AMERICAN _INEN
196029 77i'9f85 678.45 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
IV602P ..7/ ^9/85 1,901.40 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
— 5-v52G-0-0 BEE HOL= SAL -SAL -- INVENTORY
IY602F ;7/09/85 39799.38 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
119799.33 •
27- 4630- 664 -66
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50 -4630- 862 -86
-�- 196033- ---u7 BERSr-OR- D- TRUCKING---- iNyENTOR-Y 50- 6626 -- 822 -82
196033 07/09/85 382.95 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84
196033 07/!'9/85 242.55 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86
i -� - - -- � ------- - - - - -- -- 79":65-- #- - - - -- - - ---- - - - - - -- - - -_-.._
-.� 196038 U711C 185 100.0 00 # GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERRV 10- 4100 - 420 -42
•rr -CKS
••• -CKS
+ ++-CKS
-'I
i
R I �.
_. / 5
56.,;8
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
196 ^ ^.4
u7/10185
11.50
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 628 -62
196CC4
°_'7/ ^9/85-
- -- - -- 122.45---
- -0vER *,CAN LINEN
LAUNDRY - - -- ------ -
- -27- 4262 - 661 -66 --
196'�4
;7/;3/85
47.87
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 821 -82
196904
X7/-3/85
46.96
AMERICAN _INEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 841 -E4
- 196^4 -
- - -II. 7-/:3-1 -@5--
54--v48
- AME7RfCAN Lk NEM -- --
L-AUh0RY
50- 4 -262-86'4 -$6 - - -- -- -- -
' -j
55905
I
# # # # . #
- -- -- - - - --
- - - - -- --
- -- -- - - - - ...
- -- - -.. - - - --
- - -- - - - - - -- - - # # LA C K S
l
196!70.7
07fC3/85
22.110
APEX PEST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
- -- - -
—
-2.9,7
i
i
-
j
r # #•.#
r a# -CKS
196012
J7/'9/85
24.00
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
196012
?7/ 7.9/85
24.95
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CUNT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
196£1 2 - -
-- 37-1 [94 -85--
2-w-q5
A U TO M 0 6itE- SERVICc" -C -- - "N- T -flEP -A -IRS --
10- 4-2-48 -5-60 Ste- — - -- -
81.90 +
# : #r #•
-- -- - - --
- --
-- --
***-CKS
196125
7/ ^9/85
28.10
ALFONS ANDERSSON
CUNT SERV
27- 4200 - 661 -66
196C26
07/.)9/85
19092.96
BADGER METER lNC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
196026
J 7/ ^9/85 - -
- -1 r ^44.96
- BAGGER - METER INC -- - - --
WATER METERS - - --
40 -1 220- 000 -00 - - - - - -- -
.i
196926
07/!'9/85
29915.90
EACGER METER INC
WATER METERS
-40 -1220- 000 -00
196026
j7/C'9/85
4,911.60
BACGER METER INC
WATER METER
40- 1220- 000 -00
i
- - -- - --
--- 9- 0%5- 0-2-
—
- - - -- - -- - - -- --
196029 77i'9f85 678.45 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
IV602P ..7/ ^9/85 1,901.40 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
— 5-v52G-0-0 BEE HOL= SAL -SAL -- INVENTORY
IY602F ;7/09/85 39799.38 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY
119799.33 •
27- 4630- 664 -66
50- 4630- 822 -82
50- 4630 - 842 -84
50 -4630- 862 -86
-�- 196033- ---u7 BERSr-OR- D- TRUCKING---- iNyENTOR-Y 50- 6626 -- 822 -82
196033 07/09/85 382.95 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84
196033 07/!'9/85 242.55 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86
i -� - - -- � ------- - - - - -- -- 79":65-- #- - - - -- - - ---- - - - - - -- - - -_-.._
-.� 196038 U711C 185 100.0 00 # GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERRV 10- 4100 - 420 -42
•rr -CKS
••• -CKS
+ ++-CKS
-'I
i
R I �.
1985 CITY OF EDINN
CHECK-- NC. - -DA TE-
•I-
CHECK REGISTER
NOCR-
196041 ?7/1U/85 1 If, 19.Q0 FURY & CAILSON INC
196 ^41 ---= 7/1 ^JE5 15,637 -°{} BURY- B- CARISON INC
C7 -15 -85 PAGE 2
.r
- DESCRIPTION —OC-COUNT- Nd*- IRV.- #- P•0• --# -MESS AGE - - -- - --
,4
-- -- - -- -- -- --..-------- --- - - - - -- - iaa -CKS '
BLACKTCP 10- 4524 - 301 -30
BLACKTOP - -- -1G- 4524- 31- 4 -3G -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - -�
196 C4 1
07/03/85
318.10
BURY B CARLSON INC
CCNT REPARS
40- 4248 - 812 -80
•
COLLECTION -- - --
16 9975. 70 r
196 ^54
C7/ ^9/85
07/09/8`-
43.56
EROWN:NG
FERRIS
ar :tit
! I- 196C58--
_- 071G3/F
10- 4250 - 446 -44
ERISSMAN- KENNEDY INC -
-- CLEANING -SUPPL -IES
10- 4 -5 -12- 520 -5-2
16-960
196048
C7 /C9 /E5
4.41
BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPP
10- 4512 - 520 -52
- 196053
-.- 07/09/85
91.[1 a
BR?JWN- TNG- FERRIS
--- REFUS=
C-OLLECION
196049
07/09/E5
37.30
BURESH ROBERT
MEETINGS
10 -4206- 440 -44
- --
ai a a r a
r
- --
37.30 +
10- 4250- 628 -62
j
196 C5 3
07/C9185
119.91
- -
FERRIS
REFUSE
+ +• -CKS
+•+-CKS
196C53
- ';7/ ^9 /ES --
13'.58 --
BROWNING
FERRIS
- -- -- - REFUSE
COLLECTION -- - --
-10- 4250- 301 -30 -- -- --
196 ^54
C7/ ^9/85
07/09/8`-
43.56
EROWN:NG
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10- 4250 - 446 -44
j196053
196073
'17 / ^S /E5
55.42
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
CCLLECTION
10- 4250 - 520 -52
49 0
- 196053
-.- 07/09/85
— ti': -"
BR?JWN- TNG- FERRIS
--- REFUS=
C-OLLECION
10- 4250- 540 -54— - - -- --
194.62 +
196053
07/R9/85
60.D0
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10- 4250- 628 -62
j
196 C5 3
07/C9185
119.91
P.ROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECION
10 -4250- 646 -64
-J.
196053
3 ? / ^9 /E5--- - -
- - --- 43.56--
-- BROWNING-FERRIS
- -- --- -- REFUSE
CCLLECTICN-
-10 -4250- 646 -64
196053
u7/79195
19.51
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
23- 4250 - 610 -66
.I
196053
07/09/85
143.58
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
26- 4250- 689 -68
.J
1Y6053----
C7/C918
2133
WUING-
FERRIS- --
— REFUSE -
COLLECTION
27- 4250- 661- 66----- - - - - --
19 69 60.
196C53
C7/091F5
43.56
PROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
CCLLECTICN
27- 4250 - 662 -66
07/03/85
196C53
07/C9185
10 ^.60
BROWNING
FERRIS
REFUSE
CCLLECTICN
28- 4250 - 708 -70
195 05 3
- ':;7/ ^9!85
- -- — 246:98
BROWNING- FERRIS --
- - - - - -- REFUSE -
COLLECT - ION-- -
- -50- 4250- 841- 84 - - - --
196053
;:7/!'9/85
349.64
BROWVIYG
FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
51- 4250 - 861 -8E
CITY 8r-!ER
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
19682.42 +
-.I
196073
!7/09/85
159.55
CITY BEER
+ +• -CKS
+•+-CKS
196 ^54
C7/ ^9/85
10 ^.50
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
196054
J7/29/85
34.52
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1Y6 ^54
- u7/"9J85
49 0
P-ATTE- RY- ti"E-HOUSE- -------
REPAIR P-A-FTS
- ------ - -10 -4 -540- 560 -56 - -- --
-
194.62 +
- --
J
r
196058
C•7/10/85
100.00
WAYNE BENNETT
POLICE SERV
10- 4100- 420 -42
.J
raaara
tar —CKS V
19 69 60.
,7/10/85
42.90
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
26 -4624- 684 -68
•i
r
196060
07/03/85
233.50
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
r
r,
arrrra
--
aaa —CKS
196075
37/09/85
209091
CITY 8r-!ER
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
i
-.I
196073
!7/09/85
159.55
CITY BEER
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
"'
� /ffaa •
196" EC.
1Y6080
196 -) F0
-- - - -- -
7 / 9185 - - --
7/r�9/85
I/`9/8;,
- - -- 317.32 - --
59.92
2,009.50
-r3-17rfi4 -*
— CONT -MI'NN - -- --
CONT -MI'NN
CONT -MINK
GEN SUPPLIES - -- --
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CONCESSICNS
—27- 4504 - 661 -66 - --
27 -4512- 661 -66
27- 4624- 664 -66
1985 C.
CF EDINA
07/03/85
CHECK Rt —STER
COURTNDY C WAYNE
07 -15 -85 PAGE 3
`
10- 4208 - 100 -10
-- CHECK
N ?: -OATE - --
- - - - -- —
i flffaf
-- - - - -- -
UN -NO.--d-NV"- P.-O. --p- MESSAGiZ - - --
--- pMOUN-T
I
_' •affrf
- - - - -- - --
369.46
.j 1960F.2
7/39185
.'. 190(174
J7/03/F5
305.30
CITY CF 8LOO41NGTO'4
KENNEL SERVICE
10- 4278 - 470 -47
POLICE SERV
196074
J7/C3/85
153.!`9
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
KENNEL SERVICE
10- 4278 - 470 -47
196 ^,l4 --
7--q265,699---------C-!4Y
OF L- OOMIN+GTO�N
-- -SPEC- ASSES--
66- 4- 14-5- 800 -I1a ---- . - - - -- I'
79723.99 +
I
2 4 ;
196175
7/ ^3/85
-- - --- 24.26--- -
- ---- CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPP - --
10 -4504- 420 -42 - --
.I.I 190075
J7 /G3 185
17.99
CLANCY D°JG INC
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 510 -51
,
297.00 •
42.15
� /ffaa •
196" EC.
1Y6080
196 -) F0
-- - - -- -
7 / 9185 - - --
7/r�9/85
I/`9/8;,
- - -- 317.32 - --
59.92
2,009.50
-r3-17rfi4 -*
— CONT -MI'NN - -- --
CONT -MI'NN
CONT -MINK
GEN SUPPLIES - -- --
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CONCESSICNS
—27- 4504 - 661 -66 - --
27 -4512- 661 -66
27- 4624- 664 -66
--
* *+ -CKS
,
07/03/85
75.16
COURTNDY C WAYNE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 100 -10
- -
�'
- - - - -- —
i flffaf
-- - - - -- -
- - - - - - -- - -- -
-
I
_' •affrf
- - - - -- - --
+ ** -CKS
.j 1960F.2
7/39185
41.40
C7NWAY FIRE & SAFETY
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
100100
OAHL- MR HILDING
POLICE SERV
10 -4100- 420 -42
41.40
- -
-- -- -
- - --
-
i
_I
f*f -CKS I`=
I
2 4 ;
R-f f-N-C O M P A N TS 00- -&-8 L-&EK- -G I R r----
40 -4-5-62- 642-64
*** -CKS
*
196 -91
- U711 ^/85-- __.._.
-- -297: ^0 --
CiTY OF- E)I-NA-
- RUBBISH - REMOVAL- - - -
-50 -4250- 821 -82- - --
I
,
297.00 •
. I
196111
J7/C9/8:
J
DAVIDSEN DI ST INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
-- —.
----
- - -*.* -CKS --
-
1960.95
^7/10/85
431.63
COMMISSICN =R REVENUE
GASOLINE
10- 4612- 560 -56
i
917.90
196057
07/03/ °5
12.56
COURTNEY C WAYNE
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206- 100 -10
196097
07/03/85
75.16
COURTNDY C WAYNE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 100 -10
- -
�'
- - - - -- —
87.72 -. - -
-- - - - -- -
- - - - - - -- - -- -
-
I
_' •affrf
- - - - -- - --
* • *.CKS -
a I 1961x6
07/10/85
100100
OAHL- MR HILDING
POLICE SERV
10 -4100- 420 -42
- -
-- -- -
- - --
-
i
_I
f*f -CKS I`=
I
2 4 ;
R-f f-N-C O M P A N TS 00- -&-8 L-&EK- -G I R r----
40 -4-5-62- 642-64
*
24.00
196111
J7/C9/8:
107.50
DAVIDSEN DI ST INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
71I
:I
— 196 1 10--- Q7-109�fl;
1DTi
-3- Sf- N- Di-Si -iNC—
�NVE#TORY
50 -4630- 84284
— -- --'_'1
n
917.90
a f. —CKS
0
.
°
19o5 cIr,
OF coImA
cxccn xcmxorcx
ov~vs~on
pwsc ^
_
�
'r' 'c*ccn- wls
L|
-cxrE
---'
—' noy---- -'--------xre*-ucesn
0N
~' '^--
~~~--~ '`~~ ^~~~ ~ -9°o°-o-mcasx�s
-' --
!�|
196120
rIrvvo��—�
----1xizz0~rx-------'conSsv-m-WHITNEY
-- Scno1,cco---
vm~azV~aa---- --
`
^ ,|
12922o.r3
|�|
~ 196124
�7v10/85
400^ 30
nuccm J.N.
TnxvcL xooxmcc
10~11*5-000~00
.-
�
--------�---------*oo�o�-
---------
---- -' --'--'
---'-------------- '--
1961 25
L./nc/x5
159.60
ncoIr soppLv
scw ouppuco
10~*5 0 *-30 1~30
� �
.'� 1901
no/o5
59w60--------McnIr-nop0Lv-----'-------6cm-sopp
0-450*~*46~6*----------'------
—
/ 196125
orvox/xs
,a*.ov
ocpzr nuppLv
nsm xuppLIEa
Ia~*50*~646~6*
` '' 196125
nrPrs/o5
11 e.co
MERIT ouppLv
scm soppcxEo
27~*504~661~ea
- Iv612� —
'.//lcI"
----ncnrr'ouppLY
ucm-oopp----- -------4o-4s0^~mO1~oy----�
�!
761 .69 °
-�
�
� -19ol 26----
11f) t85
462 ~a
o--eooc
-Wseo'cqNrea
n~41Co~9us~9
--�------'
!-�
1961,e6
zryvo/x5
nr.*v
oAxzc cussmc
*zLcxoc
60~4208~985~90
"-/
499.49 °
m
/
^^^-Cms
'--1961-3u
—7/1
DUNEao-r-Su
r-mn*~*xn
~4rZ+8~70-7~7
---------
r|
°^^^^° '---
'---------------------'-'-----------'
'
---�' - ' -----------�---------------
-
°°°-cxS
�J ,p*�o4
31/C-9/85
36.75
c�r/wroc scxvzcca
comr ncpx�no
�o~*z*a~o*�~uo
_�
`
'! lye.. 4-5
o//nvm»
181.26
cneIc* axxzws co
comcsnoIomn
27-462*-66*-66
�.i 196143
o7fc3m5
216. 213
smnzc* axxzmm CO
cumccoszcnn
ar-*a�*~a��~uo
�
' -
--397-. 4-6
/
�
-��-77.23
---
°^°-cxS
'i 196148
-,^ n85
cLmN owr7_TY- SUPPLY
REPAIn--�----�~*54--*^9-44
p
rr.ao
_
^°°-oxo
v -
�
�1va1m-
59.o5 ------�o�-c�r*�-'--�—'
'-- -*su cnxcmAes--------
---10~*156~510~51------ --
- 195154
urvrv/ns
501.70
uoc cL/xs
uxsco �
27~4100-663-66
`
.- '--_-----
say.5s
.'
�.
'
- -
°°°~cnn
�
� �pu�»*
-or/cs/ns
51'-;2
nvzcm-wnupxmL--
—'----'10~422+~421-*2-----
-
| 196156
7 m3m5
,os.vo
pxInxTsw inopzrxL
`sr AID uLppLzco
10~*510-4*0-**
--------
asr°1n
cws
''p61s9- ----
'nrvrp1n
oo
w 4
.l
1985•Ci
jF EOINA
CHECK RL
fER
07 -15 -85
uE 5
- CHECK- N- :- -DA-Tf --
-A-MOU N-T
-- V OOR - - --- - -- -
ITEM - DESCR;- F-T+CN
GGOUAT--N4.- - NV.-- #- P.0. -1L --PIES
SAGE -
241.31 •
j'
_ I
f • ► • f •
- - -
-- -- - - - _ . - -
• a a -CKS
•
-1961 61 --
Si7- /09 -/ -85
- 33 -.S0-- FL- YI -NG -C - OUD -SA NTAR
--- RUBBI- S"- ReF &VAL-
18- 4250- -3-53 -30 - --------
- - - - --
�" I
i
33.80 •
196164
07/03/?5
.32
FREEWAY D30GE INC
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
-
--
- - -- --
-- x32
- - - - --
-
--
-- --
rftff+
+ ++ -CKS
196175
7119185
62.19
FRTTZ CO
CONCESSICNS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
62.19 +
rrrrrr
+ ++ -CKS
-
1V
1,
196161
u7/10/F c
15T AT D SUPPLY-- —--
26- 4510 - 688 -68
2G.00 +
CKS - --
-.
-- - -
-
- -- - --- _- - -...-
1961 P3
0 7/C31P5
1?.7A
GIVENS INC
RADIO EQUIP
10- 4914- 420 -42
1961ti3
?7/ ^9/85-
- -- - - - -- - 7.23 - - -
- - - - GIVENS - INC — -
-GEN SUPPLIES- - - --
i7 -4504- 661 -66 - -- - - --
17.23 +
--- -- - -------
••.- CKS - ---
I
1961Q4
,I/09/85
19. ^0
GFNEiAL C)MMUAIICATUS
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
196194
07/ ^3185 - -
- - -- 377 :50 - -
- - -- GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
- ---RADIO SERY---- -• -
- -- ----10- 4294 - 440- 44 - - --
196194
J7/119185
266x25
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
662.75 f
196195
U7/09185
91.23
GOLF CA.R MIDWEST
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 671 -66 —
91.23 +
1962 +_[ --
- cr7Fffr/85-
' 49 -.-f}
fit-- GFF- i- C-- E-PROD
- EOMMOD ;TI££
' ^- L500 -4. 40-44—
- - - ---
449.10
f r r f r •
- -
-- - - -- - - - - -
-- - - -- -- - -- -
- - -- -
r r r - C K S
196203
^7 /03 /E:
9.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EX PENSES
10 -4206- 140 -14
4.- .4,'1-
P=iiY -CASH
MEETING- EXPE -&SES
10 -4206- 140 -14 - ----
.---- - - -_ —_
1962'03
07/03/85
16.00
PETTY CASH
MFOA MEETING
10 -42C6- 160 -16
196203
07/03/85
1.55
PETTY CASH
PARKING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 490 -4E
1962 ^3
- '7/ ^3/85 - -
-- -- 6a90 --
— BETTY -- CASH-- - - - - --
-- MEETING EXF —
1962,3
4.15
PETTY CASi
SHIPMENT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
,.
1962 ^3
XC7/u3/85
17/ 3/85
2.89
PETTY CASH
SHIPMENT
10- 4274- 42C -42
-
- 1962±]3—
?7lf3�8
230-7
PE- TTY- -EA-S.
BGOK —
-'.0- 4502- 160 -1 6 - -
- - --
J
�'
196203
07/03/85
5.25
FETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4504- 100 -10
196203
07/''3/85
1.33
PETTY CAS-1
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 260 -26
rf*f*
-- '19021 3-
7Y ^9l
24}: 0- - LEROY- Fr- rIBBY - - -
-- - CCNT -SERV
- 4 - 4200 - 800 -80 - --
i
240.00 •
1985 CITY
OF EDINa
CHECK
REGISTER
C7 -15 -85
PAGE 6
- - - GEN-SUPPLY - -- - -
-- 10 -4504- 328 -30 - - - - -
196214
- .7/C91E:
7.44
TOLL COMPANY
WELDIE'G SUPPLY
10- 4610 - 560 -56
v
f CHECK- NO:-
-DA-TE
- AMOUNT
VE- NDCR
ITEM -- DESCRIPT -.IOitl
ACC0Ith %NOs- i-hV* -0 -P.0 -q
MESSAGE- - --
114. -g2-
196203
07/03/85
20. ^0
PETTY CASH
LIC RENEWALS
10 -4504- 420 -42
TOLL COMPANY
a
10 -4610- 560 -56
7/C :3/p5 --
-- -- 1:17-
-- PETTY-CAS4-
I D BADGE - - - - - --
- -10 -4504- 480 -48 - --
10- 4610 - 560 -56
196214
i1962,3
1962''3
'?7/03/85
33.19
PETTY CiASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 624 -62
u7 / ^,9/85
27.70
' f 196203
C7/�,.3/85
3.95
P--TTY CASH
PARKING
10 -4504- 627 -62
LLS-T-ROM-A -UT-C- SUP -Y
PAR -TS
196203- --
c7/03-/85-
30-7
-PETTY -CASH
- -- -- OFFICE SUPPLIES
-10- 4516 - 100- 10 - - -- -
-
"I
1962-53
1'7/G3/85
3.49
PETTY CASd
OFFICE SLFFLIES
10- 4516- 100 -10
196203
7/03/85
10.58
PETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 688 -68
c
PARTS -----------27-
4540 - 661 -66 - --
196203
:7/C3/85
72.52
PETTY CASi
PARTS
40 -4540- 804 -80
224.89 *
'*
i rrra►f
--
- -- -- - --
- --
-
-**r -CKS
J 1962 ^C
7/1C/85--- --
- - - - -- 985:"$---
- -G- -8 K -SEPVI CE -
- - - CORRECTICh - - -- --- --
- - - - -10 -4262- 301 -30 - -- -- - -- -
-
196276
J711D185
985. ^8
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -3C
19o216
'7Wn /E5
953.78
G 6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 301 -30
196206 -
- --57/10/85--
299.31-
G -B-K- SERVICES
- - -- LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 560- 56 - - - -- - --
- - -.-
196206
U7/10/85
199.48
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64
' 196206
i7/1U/85
288.54
G 6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40 -4262- 801 -80
-
- - -- ----
-1- X745 :b1 - *-
' . I r f* 1 f •
1962'!9
C7/ ^.9185
7.84
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 -
-
I
r
7.84 *
n
rf*f*
-- '19021 3-
7Y ^9l
24}: 0- - LEROY- Fr- rIBBY - - -
-- - CCNT -SERV
- 4 - 4200 - 800 -80 - --
i
240.00 •
196214
- C7/ ?9185-- -- -- --
-13:90
- TOLL-COMPANY --
- - - GEN-SUPPLY - -- - -
-- 10 -4504- 328 -30 - - - - -
196214
- .7/C91E:
7.44
TOLL COMPANY
WELDIE'G SUPPLY
10- 4610 - 560 -56
196214
�.
'?7/-59/85
43.82
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLY
10 -4610- 560 -56
19621 v-
�I/ ^9/85
114. -g2-
TOLL--COMPA -NY-
- WELDING- SUPPLY
1(1- 4610 - 560 -56 - --
196214
C7/09/8:)
21.24
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SLFPLY
10 -4610- 560 -56
' 196214
07/99/95
43.23
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLY
10- 4610 - 560 -56
196214
07/09/85 - - - -
-- - -- 242:70-
TOLL -COMPANY - - -
-- - -- -GEN -SUPPLIES -- - --
40 -4504- 801 -80 - -- --
196214
u7 / ^,9/85
27.70
TOLL CAMFANY
GEN SUPPLY
40- 4504 - 801 -80
REPAIR PARTS
507.85 *
LLS-T-ROM-A -UT-C- SUP -Y
PAR -TS
196228
-40-4622-805-8G--------.- - - -
40-4622-805-80
•.*-CKS ..iO
I
iV
O
_ p
* ** -CKS
O
I- Q
* ** -CKS
14- 4504 - 560 -56 - - - --
10 -4540- 560 -56
10- 4540- 646 -64
-10 -4620 --560- 56 - - -- -- - -- --
27 -4540- 662 -66
i
I C
0 41
i
196223
^7/ ",3/85 -- ---
- -- 3',599:41
HAWKI-NS C4EMICAL
--
WATER - -- -
196123
:7/03/85
2x590.00-
HAWKINS CHEMICAL
CREDIT
1009.41 r
! r f f f f f
� I
f 196228-
- - t7 / ^9 /g5------
58:16----
HIILSTROM AUTO SUP
Y- -
-•GEN SUPPLIES-- -
19622°_
X7/!9/85
19011.66
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP
Y
REPAIR PARTS
'i 196223
07/C9/85
83. "8
HILLSTROR AUTO SUP
Y
REPAIR PARTS
229.98
LLS-T-ROM-A -UT-C- SUP -Y
PAR -TS
196228
U7/.?9/85
99.39
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP
Y
REPAIR PARTS
r I
1 9482.1 7
-40-4622-805-8G--------.- - - -
40-4622-805-80
•.*-CKS ..iO
I
iV
O
_ p
* ** -CKS
O
I- Q
* ** -CKS
14- 4504 - 560 -56 - - - --
10 -4540- 560 -56
10- 4540- 646 -64
-10 -4620 --560- 56 - - -- -- - -- --
27 -4540- 662 -66
i
I C
0 41
y 1cP5�C.
)F F7INA
CHECK
R, TER
07 -15 -85 AGE T
CHECK
N ?:- DA-T-E--- -
-A- MOUNT-
— WE-NDOR
*** -CKS
196245
J7/C3/85
47.20
ROBERT• B SILL
SALT
10- 4538 - 440 -44
-
- - - -
- -- --
4-7-41-2 0 •
- - --
- - -- -
rrr*ar
* ** -CKS
- 196249
^.7/10/85
100.]0
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
POLICE SEPV
10 -4100- 420 -42
* ** -CKS
i
196256..
0l /t'3 /E5
- -- -- 63.'0
- -ICSI -
- CONT-- SERV------ - -- - --
—10 -4200- 420 -42 --
63.00 •
I,
196278
07/10/85
43.57
JERRYS FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
196278
7 7 / ^.: /52c _._
- -._ - - -- 17.92--------
J =RRYS FOODS
-- CONCESSICNS - - - -._. _-- -- -
--- 26- 4624 - 684 -68 _
1962152
:.7/03185
.99
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 684 -68
196218
�7/iC/85
51.39
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624- 684 -68
*rrrrr
"
-- -
- - - -- -
*** -CKS -
j 1962`•9
7/10185
100.00
WALTER JOHNS04
POLICE SEPV
10 -4100- 420 -42
'
10O.nO r
-
I -
_ � • * *rrr
-- - --
-
-- - - -- -- - -- - -- -
. ** -CKS
1963- ^2
1 -
- - - -- -3,735.12-
KUETHER -LIST CT
-- - • INVENTORY-- --
50 -4630- 822 -82 - -
-- -
196302
J7/C9/85
6.433.81
KUETH =R' DIST CO
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
10,168.93 *
"
* ** -CKS -
196314
'7/473195 - --
- 32.P'3--
-KNGX LUMBER-CO
-- - - - - -- -GEN SUPPLIES - -- - --
10- 4504- 301- 30 - -
I
- --
1963J4
47,7/ ;3/85
77.52
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
1963-4
C7/C9/85
223.00
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 646 -64
1903 4—
r37/�?9/E
18i4�-- XNOXtUMe ft CO
REP�iR- PAA� -S
—10-4540-390-3n
196394
67/10/85
44.67
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
-- —
196304
67/10/85
36.87
RN OX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -46C4- 646 -64
1963474
u7/1f?/85- - - -
- -- - 2f?.28- -----KNOX
LUM9c'R CO
- - - -- LUMBER- --------- - - -
-10 -4604- 646 -64 --
-
196364
67/C9/85
39.29
K14OX LUMBER CC
LUMBER
10 -46 ^4- 646 -64
196304
'---196394---a7/-j9-t85
17/10185
458.99
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
1-3- r7-i---
KNOX- LUMB =R-CO—
LUMBER
10- 46O}4- 646 -64—
196304
Of/C3/85
73.28
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
_ _
196304
97/10/85
21.17
KNOX LUMBER CO
PARTS
27- 4620 - 662 -66
1963 ^4
- C.7 /C3/ES - - --
47.24--
KNOX- LUM9= R- CO--
---- -- -GEN SUPPLIES— -
28 -4504- 708 -70
1.
1963C4
1963!'4
C7/G3/85
'C1/03/85
23.92
KNCX LUM9 =R CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
24.23
KNOX LUMB =R CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
—
55 -r4�5
*rrrrr
_I
* ** -CKS
19F5 CITY
OF =DINT+
CHECK REGISTER
07 -15 -85
PAGE 8
- CHftK -T10:'
DATE
AMOUNT
OESCRIPI-i-ON
ACCOUNT-- NQ-.--- NV @ -N- P.U. - -4-
MESSAGE- -
196311 -
C7 / ^9/ °5 - --
- - 39.79 --
- -- FASTS *DE- BEVERAGE
- - INVENTORY
196511
7/ ^,9185
3,879.55
EAST3IDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822 -82
196311
C7 /C9 /E5
39.79-
FASTSIDE BEVERAGE
CCRRECTICN
50- 4630- 822 -82
°
r
-196311- --
U7/09/�85-
-90391.95
- ASTS-IDE-SEVERAGE - --
INVENTORY
196311
C7/09/85
6,271.95
EASTS'_DE BEVERAGE
'INVE,NTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
j
19, 543.45 •
Ic
frf. -CKS
196317-
509; R4-
tAWSON-- PRODUCTS- --- --
--GEN SUPPL ?ES - ---
10- 45�J4- 322- 3G--------- - -
- - -- - --- - - - - --
�.
196317
U7/09/85
235.04
LAWSON PR30UCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 560 -56
196317
L/ /(19/85
133.11
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
°
i
196318
C7110IF5
76. °.0
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 440 -44
°
19631 8- ---
u7/10/8
-1P.3
ROS -1NC-- --- -
- -6£N SUPPL -iE-S-
23 -45G4- 611 -61 -- - - -
-- - - -- -- - --
196319
u7 /1C 185
20.41
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
27- 4262- 662 -66
109.21 +
o
196319
u7103/85
398.56
LEITNER COMPANY
SAND GRAVEL
27- 4522- 662 -66
��
- - -- -
398.56 +
a
f # # f f #
*rr..CKS
�
o
196323 -
^7/ ^9 /g5 - --
- -- 6,50
-- _LINH!)FF -- -- --
-- -CABLE TV -- — -.
-10-2149-000-00- -
6.50 •
-- m
i—
-- •#r -CKS -
- -- - -
196331
C, 711C/E5
21'3010
LAHASS CORPCRATION
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
196351 -
')7 /1U /85 -- --
-- ----- 526. ^0 - -
- -- LAHASS - CORPORATION - -
-- REPAIR- PARTS -- - --
-40- 4540 - 808 -80-
736.30
I
--- - - - - --
frr -CKS
196337
37/ (19185
270.10
LAKE STATE EQUIP
CINT REPAIFS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
ffffif
+ ++ -CKS
0
196344
07/091E5
37.80
MEO OXYGEN 8 EQUIP
EQUIP MAIAT
10- 4274 - 449 -44 —
°
196344
17/03/E5
17.05
MEO OXYGEN 8 EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
•
- -- - - ..
'� I
f
fffff f
- -- - -
- --
-- —
- --
f f. CKS
•
196346
07/09/85
3,786.75
MET N WASTE C L COMM
BLDG PERMITS
-- --
10- 3095 - 000 -00
- - -# - --
-
.�
39786.75 •
fr# -CKS
.�
a
�-
- 196358
tr7 /"'9/85
24T71
M-At- ?-M-�EiiViCE -- - - -- ALARM -SERtl—
3- 4304 - 610 -61- -
- - -- -- - - --
196359
L7 /179 /E5
93.40
3m ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SER4
28 -4304- 708 -70
_i
196358
07/10/85
5.00
3M ALARM SERVICE
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
I'o
19E5 Cl
F FOINA
CHECK RL
ER
07 -15 -85
;F 9 i
CHECK- Nt�.
-DATE-
- AMOUNT
VrNDQR-- -- - - - -
-- STEM -OE SCFiPTIaN
-AC-C-00-1T-N0.-;-NV--#- P.O.- 4-- MESSAGE-
196358
u7 /f'9 /E5
17 ^.13
3M ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV
50- 4304 - 821 -82
155350
:7/ 9185 -
- 146.79 - -
3M ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV -
- 50- 4304 - 861 -86
54 ^ .7, 3 +
-
-- 196 35 9 - --
0.7/031{25—
-9-4?9
— MINN- TORO-1 NC-
REPAIR -PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56 - -
- - - -- ---
196359
07/03/85
126. ^l
MTNN TORC INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
-
1Y6359
J1/03185
65.96
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1Y6359
97/,3 3195____ - - --
-_ ---- ..- . -R.R5 -- -- --
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR FAFTS - - --
- - -- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - --
196359
C7 /J3 /F5
1.Q2
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -5E
1-
196359
07/03/85
2.1^
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
I'
196359 --
?71=73/85
-- 6'-1
MINN- T-QR0-- iNC- - --
-- REPAIR- -PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66- - - - - - --
-- - - - -- -
1Y6359
J7/�9/85
35.96
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
-
311.30 •
196360
07/03/85
45.00
MINNESOTA WANNER
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
-
45.00 a
arttaa
- - ---
- ..--- - -- ---
aaa -CKS
196365
^7/10 /85 --
- ---- 10 ^.?0 - - -
--- PERT MERF_LD
PCLIC£ -- SERV - --
-- - 10 -4100- 420 -42
196366--
- - - -37 /!?9185
- 123 -.?8
MPNN_- SOTA-- BAR- - - - - --
- INVENTORV
50- 4632 - 822 -82
'r
-
196366
)7/09/85
753.10
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
196366
J7/09/E5
762 .J8
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
- - -- --- - - - --
- --1 X63$.16- +--------------
- - - -._
'
196367
07/r3/E5
6.90
MCGARVFY COFFEE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
j 196367 - ---
?7/+ 3/ -8
5.(49
C-GARVF- Y-- "FFEE - - -
- -- GEN - SUPPLTES
10 -4 504 - 500-- 50- - -- ----
- - - - -- - - - -- -
71.90 *
_
- t f • r • r -
- --
-- - - -- --
- -...- - -' —.-
• • a- C K
- -- -'
196370
J7/03/85
418.22
MICLANO PRODUCTS CO
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624- 684 -68
•aaa.r
+aa -CKS
1Y63 /8
u7/10/85
9,086. ^5
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84 -
-
1963/8
U7/C9185
81154.85
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
r -- — --
- 1-7-9-2-4 -0 x90-•
- -
- -- - --
196379
07/09/85
35,40
METRO FON= COMM
EQUIP RENAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
196379
- 37/ ^9/55 -_..
_._- m�rJn----
. -NETRJ FON_ COMM -- -
- GEN- SUPFLIES - - - - --
- —10- 4504 - .180- i8- - - - - --
65.40 +
I i
196381
'7/ ^3/85
244.00
STAR 8 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4210 - 140 -14
•rrrra
196385
07/10/85
240.00
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTION
10- 4242 - 353 -30
—
J_; 196335
u7/10/85
720.00
MCGUIRE ROBERT
PROJ 3 INSP
60 -1300 -012 -18
19Y5 CITY
OF SOMA
CH_CK REGISTER
C7 -15 -85
PAGE 10
CHECK - NO:
- DATE —
END02'— - --
-- ITEM - DESCRIPTION—
ACCOUNT`- NOw- INVrq- P.O. -A
MESSAGE -
AMOUNT—
96r'.20 •
- - -- -
**f *rr
*** -CKS
7/f19 >8-5—
284:1$ —
NH- GR-APH!C-- SUPPLY - --
INVENTORY- SUFPLY-----
-23 -1- 2139 - 000 -00 - --
284.18 •
tR + + ++ ...-
- - ----- --- -_.
- -- -------------------------
- - -
- - -... -- -- - - -_--
rra -CKS
196429
J1/ '_ 9/ ?5
996.90
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
°
196429' --"'--
T/• 9 ?5
- 271 -:6A
PEPS !-COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY- - --
50- 4632- 822 -82 ----- - - - - --
- - - - - -- - -
196419
//'79/85
613.00
'PEPS! COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
196429
!7/'19/f5
459.55
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
0
- -- -
-- -- - —2 13 41 ; 0 5 -. - --
* ** -CKS
o
196434
C7/G3/85
24.64
PRINTER'S SERVICE INC
EQUIP MAINT
28- 4274 - 707 -70
'
24.64 •
o
I
+.frr f
* ** -CKS
r
`
19 6 4 3 9- - - --
`_'7/9/85
346;9$
PRI04- L-AKc_!-AG - ---
SAND- GRA-VFL -ROCK
i� -4522 301- 3t---- - - - - --
- - -
346.7$
a
-CKS
' -�
196441
.'.7/10/8'.
166.10
THE PRTNT SHOP
PRINTING
10 -4610- 628 -62
m
-1
- -
--
- - -- - +—
-166-.10
- - -.
-
- - -
-
* R * f f
*rr -CKS
O
196443
v7/ ^9/ ?5
98. ^0
POMMER MF3 CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 627 -62 —
** +faf
---- -- - -- --
*••..CKS
s
1904 1.7
^7/091f5
- - - - 356.09 --
- ROYAL- CRCNN-BEV -' - -
-- INVENTORY -- -- -
-50- 4632 - 842 -24 - -
196460
,7/09/85
540.95
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
897.94
•* *.CKS
196465--
^7103185--
-- - -- ----- 42.40 -
-- RICMFIEILO PLUMB B CO --
CONT REPAIRS -- --
-28 -4248- 708 -70- -
42.40
r
�
- • **- CKS- -
- - --
''.'
196467
07/03/25
87.70
ROYAL BEYrRAGE CO
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
•
- -
- - -- --
-- 9- 7 i 7 . --
- - _ - --
- -- - - -- --
- - -- -- - --
* ** -CKS
..'
196470.
Q7/10/25
25.00
OR ROCKWELL
MED SERV
10 -41CO- 481 -48
-I
25.00 •
•
'
1945 C.
OF EDINA
CP+ECK R�_,.iTER
07 -15 -85
PAGE 11
i
CHECK
NO.- DATE --
---- AMOUNT-
- dEN00 ? - - -- - - ---
iiEM- GES6RIf'i %OPf
-AC- COUNT -WO. INN - - -# P.O.---4-
MESSAGE - --
c
f+f -CKS
1964 F2
L;7/r3/85
6 ^. ^0
SATELLITE INDUSTRIES
CONT SERV
27 -4200- 662 -66
I
fttfff
fff-CKS
1964 F5
C7/C9/85
19232.38
STATE BLDG INSP
BLDG PERK ?TS
— 10 -3095- 000 -00
196495
7/'.9/85
87.00
STATE BLDG IN SP
SUR CHG TAX
10- 3113 - 000 -00
- —
-- - -- -
- - - -'P -3-19 z-3 8 f
- - -- -- -
- - -- -- - --
+tr +r•
--
-- — -- - --- - - - -
-- - - --
••...CKS
196490
19649^
07/x9/85
36.57
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GEN SUPPLY -
-- —10- 4504 - 340 -30 - -
J7/C19/85
54.95
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 34C -30
1
- ---
- - ----
---- - - - -- - - - - --
�
- - - - --
- --
... -CKS
196492
J7/C'3/85
6.60
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6.60 •
<
196453
07/ "9/85
39910.95
SOL'T -HSIDE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
196493
07/ ,j9/85
79352.00
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
..
-
ttittf
6.
- --
- - --
-
_ _
'•► -CKS
1Q65:72
71 1C3 /F5
64.45
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET— -
_
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
1965 ^1
)7/C3/85
254.30
SUBURBAN CHEVRCLET
REPAIR FARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
1965 ^,1
- ,7/r3/F5 -
-- - - - - -- 64.45- - -- - - --
SUBURBAN - CHEVROLET-
DARTS -- ---- -
- - - -10 -4620- 560 -56 -- - --
383.70 *
-_
-- - ------
- - - - -- - - -- - --
- -- - -- - - --
— • .. -CKS -- ---
� �
196504
47/111 ?5
29.40
ST PAUL BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 600 -60
- - - -- -- -
- - -- 29.40 -
�<
LL
- - --
f.. -CKS
196516
D7/C9185
141.81
SEARS ROEBUCK --
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 390 -30
•
141.81 •
�
tttrft
--
•••-CKS
-.
- 196526 -
- - -t 1- /10 /8-5
.7 ?a ?.$ -- TR- AC-Y-- 0-3L -CO --
- 6ASOL-i -NE
1 -0- 46-1 -2 56C - -56 -- -
-- -- -- • -
1I
I 1
29730.70
- - - --
196727
^7/ ^3 /R5 -
- - - -- 40.72------
TAYLOR--SA_ES - -
CORRECTION — --
- -26 -4274- 684 -68 -
i196527
w07/C3/85
4 ^.72
TAYLOR SALES
EQUIP MAINT
26- 4274 - 684 -68
196521
J7 /IC 185
63.44
TAYLOR SALES
EGUIF MAINT
26- 4274 - 684 -68
-
1965 2 7
-$7- /9-318
3 4---T
A YL?R -SAtE S-
EOU IP--MA 3 NT
26- 4274 - 689 -68-
196527
07/03/85
40.72
TAYLOR SALES
EQUIP MAINT
26- 4274 - 689 -68
__ __ —_
196527
07/03/85
210.02
TAYLOR SALES
CONCESSICNS
26- 4624- 684 -68
5'
-
r
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGIST=R
07 -15 -85
PAGE 12
i
CHECK - ND:-
-DATE
- AMOUNT—
£NDC? -- - - --- --
ITEM -DES CRIPTi-ON
ACCOUNT- NO.-- INY.- A -P *Oa -M
MESSAGE -- - --
i
397.22
•I
'
►•farr
-
aaf —CKS
I-
i- �
-19653U
GENERAL SUPPLIES
-10- 4504 -- 301 -3D - -- - -- --
-
318.10 +
of r r a a
-- - -- - ° -
-- -- --. - --
- - -- - -- -
- - .- -- - - �.. - - --
a a a -CKS
196537
J7/09/85
10F.50
TRI STATE DRILLING
CCNT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 646 -64
°
trftrr
• +• -CKS
4b
196539
u7/09/85
22.50
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
PARTS
27- 4620- 662 -66
196539
07 /G•3 /R5
151.26
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
PARTS
27- 4620- 662 -66
ffrfaa
•*•-CKS
°
19E542
07/ ^9/85
11.305.52
THORPE DIST
INVENTORY
5 ^- 4630- 862 -86
" - -�
11 9305 .52 •
°
fffkfi
* *+ -CKS•
196549
J7/ ^79!85- -'
- --- 33:12---
- -TWIN CITY ENGINE
REPAIR PARTS-
33.12
- 1v6S5U- ---
G7/Lt918-
-99.2D
T- ISOEL- STANDARD - --
-- REPAIR - PARTS-
—10- 4540- 560- 56-- ----- - -- - - --
-
99.20
• �
c
KS
196553
^7/C9/85
110.30
GOODYEAR
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
°
-lv655P - --
v7/�,9185
1fl D-
GOODYEAR - - ---
-CONT- REPAIRS—
10- 4248 - 560-56 - --
--
220.00
I
— -- - --
- -- - - -- - - -- - --
- - - -- - -- — -- — -- -
• f a —CKS
'
'
196569
07/09/85
108.77
VALLEY IND PROPANE
GASOLINE
28- 4612 - 707 -70
0
-- - - --
----
10i+. -7-7
ffr+aa
* ** -CKS
196572
37/03/85
462.35
VAN PARER CO
PAPER SUPFLIES
10- 4514- 520 -52
462.35 *
•
rff *rf
+ +* -CKS
196575
--- '.'7109/85 -- - - ---
-.-. -- 36.45
— YATER-PR000CTS- --- - --
- REPAIR PARTS--- --
40 -454D- 801 -80
36.45
kwv-
-fff— CKS --
I
'
196579
07/C3/F5
58.62
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 301 -30
•
• 1985 C.
)F EDINA
CHECK R
TER
07 -15 -85
GE 13
- CHECK N^.. -- DATE-- - - - - --
VENOC9 - - - - -- -------
ITE-ld- DES- CRIP -T-ION
ACCOUNT-- fIO.- I- :4Yr -JI- P.O. -Jt-
MESSAGE--- - - - - -- `
"AMOUNT - - - - --
=,. 196579
07/03/85
223.44
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
TOOLS
40- 4580- 801 -80
I
- 282. ^6 •
CKS -
19659t'
J7/1G/85
HENRY WROBLESKI
POLICE SEFV
10- 4100- 420 -42
-
_
*** -CKS -
IY6542 -
- - u1/-C9185-
___61 st?0
M:D- CENTR -AL- FIRE -- -
- CON T- REPAI- flS--------
13- 42 -48- 646 -b4-- - -
- -- -- -- -.
61.00 •
i
KS
190612
C / /(7918:
516. 3 0
MIDWEST ASPHALT CURP
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 803 -8C
- - - -
516.30 *
- - - - -- --
— - - - --
196613
:7/ ^9/85
163.P0
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
- - - -- 163.80 * -
f R # k k #
• *r—CKS �
196616
1.7/013185
341.44
MILLIPORE CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 482 -48
'
341.44 •
*** -CKS
196700- -
1;7/03-/-85-
2-. -80
- R-- C- IDENT- I- F- IC-AT- laNS-----
"- 6EN - -SUPP -LIES-
10 -4- 504 - 200- "20 - - - -- - - --
- - _
2.90
1967 ^1
^.7/C3/f5 ------
15. °0--—
CIkDII -MOLT
CLASS REFLhD-- - - - - --
23 -3500- 000 -00 -- -
= t
15.00 •
-dO- FRENCH--- --- ----
-- iNS-T- -FEE
23 -4- 100- 6-14 -61 -----------------
t
125.00
1967!73
'77/C3/85-- --
6 .50 - - --
- ZACKS -TNC - - - -- -
PARTAS ----
- - - -27 -4620- 662 -66 -
60.50 #
- 1967P4----
"- v7- /- ('3Y-E5
24;-75
--E-d3 -ARKS -- -
--- REFUNO
40-35-2-5- 000- 0 0- -------------
._..--- "-- - -__ --
24.75 •
196795--
17/=3/85 - - - -
-- - 66.?Q - -
-- JUDITH -EKSTROM - -
- REFUND - - --
40- 3525 - 000 -00 --
66.10
-- 1967 ^5---
ii7- / {3/E5
25:14
— EBERt49RDT -£ORP—
REFUND --
--40- 352 -5- 000 -00 ---- -"------
..._ - -. _
`
25.11 #
..I
1967 ^.7
07/e3/85 - - - --
- 3 ?.77------
L-eUIS- ABRAHAM -
- - MILEAGE - --
- - - -40 -4208- 806 -80 -
37.77
---1967 12 3--
3-7hd -fff
75z$O ---
PATRICK - JOHN -SErKO
CORRECTS -Ch—
--;0- 4120- 438 -42 —
196708
77/03/85
75.00
PATRICK JOHN S;YKO
WAGES
10- 4120 - 438 -42
_ 196708
07/03/85
75 . ^0
PATRICK JOHN SEYKO
WAGES
10- 4120 - 439 -42
1985 CITY
OF EOINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -15 -85 PAGE 14
J
ff CHECK-?V0;—DA—T
i
RAFIX
— b °_NDC4- --- -- - - --
ITEM- DESCRIQiiON
ACCOUNT- NO.-- INV• -O- P.O. -q- MESSAGE -- -
MOUNT-
-I
" - �
75.00 •
196725
07/C3/85
108.78
EXONOMY 04TA PRODUCT
1967 ^9
77/k'3/85
22.50
KRISTOFOR SCHOELLER
WAGES
10 -4120- 439 -42
- --
22.50 •
d
19671
17/,, ^.3/E5
311.28
HENN CTY M =DICAL CTR
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 420 -42
„I 190726
196710
07/03/85
428.68
HENN CTY MEDICAL CTR
1ST AID SUFPLY
10- 4510- 44C -44
. "a
- 739:96 -•
-
196711
77/!'3185
46.00
R L POLK 8 CO
ADVERTISIDG
50- 4214 - 842 -84
196712
07/03/85
25.00
SESAC INC
PERMIT
28 -4310- 708 -70
°
-- -
- - - - - -
-- - -- - 25.`!0 -r
- , 196713
Of /C3/85
46.70
F w E COPP
CONTRACTS
10 -4288- 510 -51
-
46-;70-
--- - - -- --
------ - -- - --
--- �--- . - - - - -- - - --
196714
07/03/8'
32.40
ROTO ROOTER
CONY REPAIFS
28 -4248- 708 -70
"a
-
-- - -- -- - - --
- -- - - - - -- - 32.40- . -
- - - -- -- - -- - --
' 196715
?7/03/85
29.50
COLUMBIA 30OKS INC
BOOKS
10- 4502- 600 -60
'°
- - - - --
--
- 29;50
— - - --
- - -- —
-- - - - - -- .._ .
196716
::7/ ^3/85
53.50
NORTHERN AIRE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
°
_ I 196717
07/C3/85
3.57
MN DEPT OF ECONOMIC
UNEMP COMF
10- 4160 - 510 -51
°
-- - -
-- - -
—3-5-7
-
--
' 19671E
J7 /u3 /E5
100.00
CAREN BECKLEY
PETTY CASE
26- 1030 - 000 -00
' 196719
J7/03/85
3.98
FADIO SHACK
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
°
- -- - -- -- -
i
- - - - --
- 3-.98 —r
- - --
--- - -- --
- - - -- - -- -
-
' 196720
07/03/ ?5
83.47
HAROLD C SWANSON
UNIFORM ITEMS
10 -4266- 422 -42
°
- -- - --
- - -- -- - 83 .4 7 -:
196721
u7 /03/85
39389.64
HENN CTY TREASURER
ROOM 8 BOORO
10 -4286- 220 -22
°
— - - --
—3-T3 8 9;-6.4-
' 196722
07/03/85
56.45
INTERSTATE OFFICE
RADIO EQUIP
10 -4914- 422 -42
°
_
- -- - --
- -56.45 -.-
iii -CKS °
I '�O
•o
le
196724
07/03/85
88.15
RAFIX
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 421 -42
E8.1 5 •
196725
07/C3/85
108.78
EXONOMY 04TA PRODUCT
PRINTING -
10 -4600- 420 -42
' 1 - -- --
108.78 .
- --
-
1So72E
07/C9/E5
343.49
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
„I 190726
- 07/09185
114.89
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
iii -CKS °
I '�O
•o
le
'
19E5 C,
OF EO'NA
CHECK P•z�.-.STER
07 -15 -85 PAGE 15
- CHECK N0:
-QA TE - - --
AMOUNT - ---
-- VENDGR - - -- ----- - - -
- -- ITE14- DESCR- IPT -I -0N
-- ACCOUNT- NO.- I- NV,- A -P.O. t1- MESSAGE - - -
-- -
19o726
J7/.-91F5
587.51
NORTHISTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
1045.39 -a
196727
C�7/29/f5
452.30
ED KRAEMER
CLASS V MATERIALS
10 -4532- 301 -30
- - - -- -- -
- --
452 -00 •
19672P
a i /r,9 /85
54.95
DIMS SPORTING GOODS
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 420 -42
54 .95- + - - -
-- -- -
-i -i
196729
17/•19185
1F. 0.70
RAMS:-'Y CTY MEDICAL
SEMINAR
10- 4202 - 420 -42
I
"
196130
J7/C9/85
185.54
HOYT CONSTRUCTION
REFUND
40- 3525- 000 -00
_ _.. -
- -- 185.54 * -- -
- - - -- -- -
196731
17/ 9185
115.59
NORWEST BANK
DUE FRCM HRA
10 -1145- 000 -00
- -- --
- - - --
- -� 1-5.59 - a
._ -- - - --
- - - - -- - --
- - -- -- -- - - - -- - -- . _
- ..'
196732
07/09/85
245.00
LOUISE E 4OLMOUST
AMBULANCE REFUNC
10- 3180 - 000 -00
-- - - - - -- - - -
- - -- -- 245.4?Q
I
196733
17/09/85
17.12
E Z GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARATS
27- 4540 - 671 -66
196734
=77/09/85
351.24
BUREAU OF BUSINESS
TRAINING AICS
10 -4608- 280 -28
i
- — -
- --351 .24--*- -
- -- -- - --
196735
77/ ^9185
525. ^0
PATTcR HELLSTROM
INSTRUCTCR
23 -4100- 614 -61
'
196736
07/19/85
502.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4100- 614 -61
.;
- -- -- --- - - -
- -- 502.- " =0- +- -
- - - -- - -- - - -
,..-
'
196737
"7/C9/85
721.).O
PAM BONZELET
INST
23 -41G0- 614 -61
<
196738
n7/09/85
140.00
JUDY LI'EQER
ART WORK SCLC
23- 3625 - 000 -OC
- - - - - -
- -- 140
- - - - - - -- --
- - -- - - - - - -- -- -
_. . - --- ..--- - - - - -- - - -
196739
)7/79/85
1.82
JOHN ACOST4
ART WORK SCLC
23 -3625- 000 -GO
--' — -- --
--
1 . F 2
�'I
.
196740
J7/09/85
8.40
JEAN ADAMS
ART WORK SCLC
23 -3625- 000 -00
- - -- -- - -
- -- R , 4 0 - a - - - --
- - --
196741
07/C9/85
7.35
WALLACE Fi.ANDERS
ART WORK SCLO
23- 3625- 000 -0G
.,
19074e
07/(?9185
2.1D
DICK GREEN
ART WORK SCLO
23- 3625 - 000 -00
c
"L.
196743
0! /C9/85
3.15
PAT GREER
ART WORK SCLC
23- 3625- 000 -00
c
I
-
196744
97/09/85
39.55
JEAN H.AEFELE
ART WORK SCLC
23 -3625- 000 -GC
i
c
t
19E5 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -15 -85 PAGE 16
CHECK %T
DATE
VENDOR ---ITEF-DES00IP-1I-ON
CCO#JN7-NOw-IhW*-N-P•O• -#
--A-MOUNT—
39.55
196145
J//r9185
3.67
MIRS HEErAARn,
ART WORK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
3.67
*
196746
C'7/C9/85
9.55
PI PHI
ART WORK SILO
23- 3625 - 000 -00
9.55
*
196747
07/n9/85
7.?0
M MADSEN
ART WORK SCLC
23- 3625 - 000 -00
7.`0
t
196748
07/T9/E5
28*00
AL MONN
ART WORK SCLD
23-3625-000-00
28.10
_j
196149
07/,9/25
72*10
BETTY PEDDIE
ART WORK SCLC
23-3625-000-00
72.10
1967 f!
'17/79/85
1.40
HELEN ZAB_:'L
ART WORK SCLC
23- 3625- 000 -00
1 .40
196 751
J7/09/85
17.15
ART WHITE
ART WORK SCLC
23-3625-000-00
17.15
*
196752
07/G9/85
12.60
KAY SCHLOSSER
ART WORK SOLO
23-3625-000-00
12.60
*
196753
07/C9/85
1.75
R PAULOSEK
ART WCRK SCLC
23-3625-000-00
1.75
196754
07/09/85
32.50
SUSA4 MOCRE
INVENTORY
10-2149-000-00
196755
.17/12/ ?5
4 560 .- 0
MICWEST AQUA CARE
CONT SERY
10-4200-358-30
560.10
•
196756
57/09/85
14 -1- 0
DANS REGISTER SERV
EQUIP MArNT
27-4274-663-66
140 .0 0
*
•
196757
37/r9185
31.95
POLLIE PAULSON
CONT SERY
23-42CO-610-61
31.85
*
196158
07/09/85
662.00
KOHLER MIKI
CONCESSIONS
27-4624-684-68
662.30
*
196755
J7/Z9 /P5
15.130
6ENDY 130KOVOY
REFUND SWIM
10-3500-000 -00
19676n,
07/09/85
32.30
BONNIE CROUCH
REFUND TENNIS
10-3500-000-00
196761
07/09/85
260.'nO
DAY GIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
260 .010
*
196762
U1/09/85
55.98
CONCEPT MICROFILM
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4204-500-50
55.98
*
- 1985 Cl
OF E01NA
CHECK R, _6TER
C7 -15 -85 .,,5E 17
r---CHECK kC: DdTE - - -- --- —
AMOUNT
-- VE-4004— - -- - - --
?TEP- DESC- R-IP4- I -0N----
A&G0UN -"O�I- NY.- B - -P.0. *- MESSAGE -
- - -T-
196763
c7 /C9 /E5
97.'!6 -
CAROLE KULAK
MILEAGE --
27 -4208- 662 -66
97. ^b
190764 - - --
3f/ °9/85
908 -:86—
PARR- ENGINE- ERING--------
SERVI -CES
10- 4220 - 260 -26 --
1967o5
07 /n9 /P5 - -
-3F6.44 - - --
BRW - - - - --
SERVICES ---------
- - -10- 4220 - 260 -26 - -- - -- _
190765
37/10/85
359750.02
BR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1270 - 000 -00
"
36.636.44
196766
07 /C91E5
62.00
STRAGAR POSCCE-
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
.
62.00
196767
07/'•9185
168.65
MILLER BRADFORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
" 196767
07/79/895
108.74
MILL :R BP%DFCRD
REPAIR FARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
R
-196767 -
-; 771 9/85
-- 114- s1-S----
MiiLER- BR40 FORD - - - --
-REP AlR- P AFT S
'0 -4 -51.0 --560 56 --- - - - -
-- -•
391 .54 +
F
196768
37/-9/85 -
- -- -1G.1D - - - --
SNAP -ON TOOLS CORP
PARTS - - - -
-10- 4620 - 560 -56 - -
14.10 *
i
i E
196T69- ---
j?l "29 /P
5fl- 05---
AU-TO-i1MDEESALERS -1-hC —REP
AIR- -F -AAT-S
10 -4540 560 - -56 _ -- --------- -- --- - -.
- -. �`
58.15 *
F
196f In
-- U7/i?9/85 - - - -
- -- 498.97--- ---
CIES =L COMPONEMTS
PARTS-
10 -4620- 560 -56 -- --
498.97 *
196771 -- --
v- 71091 0 5
328 -s3@-
3NiER- -STA -TE- EXPRESS-
CBNSTRUC-T -I-ON ----
; 4 -2.2- 000 -00 - - -- - -- - --
--
328.30 *
I-' 196772
G'7/ ^9185 - - --
- --- 31.10 ---
PEREY- -TURNSTILES - --
CONSTRUCTION---
10- 1422 - 000- 00--- __.___.
190772
07 /C9 /85
3,110.70
PEREY TURNSTILES
CONSTRUCTICN
10- 1422 - 000 -00
196772
�7 /f9 /E5
31.10-
PEREY TURNSTILES
CCRRECTICN
10- 1422 - 000 -00
196773
07/09/85
209.22
JAY B KISER
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
- -- - - - - -- --- - - -
- -- -- 239.22- - + - - - --
------- - - - - -
196774
07/10/85
555.00
58593-9
MOCRE BUSINESS CTR
OFFICE EQUIP
10 -4906- 500 -50
i
196775
37/10 /895
636.00
EDINA TRAVEL
AIR FAIR
10 -1145- 000 -00
r
_ - -- ------------
636.80 -•-
196776
07 /in /85
150.90
U OF MN
CONF
10 -4202- 200 -20
4
15+6777
67/10/85
14.70
MAGNUSON SOD
SOO & 8LACKDIRT
10- 4562 - 301 -30
�
196777
37/101tl5 - - - - ---
102.0^
- MA;NUSON -SOD - - - --
SOD -8 - BLACK - DIRT - -
-40- 4562- 803 -80
117.60 *
c
-ltblf 8--
vlf1B�85
441;67
P CCA -RT-HY
SUPfRVi"R
10-44-00-624-62 - - - - --
I "�
- -
441.67 *
E
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
INST
10-4604-260-26
CHECK-NO.
DATE ----dMOUNT,-
ART
CTS
23-4100-614-61
PAT WOLF
15.00
•
196180
_7/10/85
329.10
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
329.�C
INST
196791
)7/10/85
50.00
BILL DIETITCHSON
INST
ART
50•0
23-4100-614-61
196782
07/10/85
19200
CTR
23-4100-614-61
JTNNY MOE
1 92 .0 0
ART
196793
07/10i85
294.70
INST
ART
CTR
294.00
•
190 7 3,.
07/1 ^ /F5
300.10
23-4100-614-61
JUDY BLAIN
INST
3 0,D . -
CTR
196785
07/10/85
234.30
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
234.00
INST
1967-6
D7/1C tF5
33 .00
CIR
330.30
•
196787
J7/10/8 25
104.)o
196738
j7/10/P5
633.00
633.r)O
•
196169
'17 ilO /25
416*00
416.10
•
196790
j7/10/F5
175.:0
175.,10
•
196791
❑7/100/85
60.00
190792
17/10/85
468*10
468.110
196793
07/10/85
180.00
182. 0
•
196794
L;7 / 10 OP5
66.00
66.00
•
196/95
L7/10785
234 .2 0
234.00
196796
07/10/85
15 ^.]0
150.00
•
196797
071101851
766.10
766.00
CHECK REGISTER 07-15-85 PAGE is
COR------- 7EM--OESCf-If 7-I6N C--C-0Uf#"0-w---lN We-0--Pe-Ov —A-MES SAGE -
CWDC INDUSTRIES
LUMBER
INST
10-4604-260-26
MONICA FOGG
INST
ART
CTS
23-4100-614-61
PAT WOLF
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
PAUREEN BROCKWAY
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
FILL COLE
INST
ART
CTR
23 -4100- 614 -61
BILL DIETITCHSON
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
JEAN GRAPm
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
JTNNY MOE
INST
ART
CTR
23- 4100 - 614 -61
SUSAN FRAME
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
JUDY LIEBER
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
JUDY BLAIN
INST
ART
CTR
23-41CO-614-61
BOB CONNOLLY
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
KRIS CSTEN
INST
ART
23-4100-614-61
CIR
BONNIE
SKELTON
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
POAPG---
HEE;AARD
INST
ART
CTR
23-4100-614-61
PHYL HAiYWA INST ART CTR 23-41 CO-61 4-61
MONICA FOGG INST ART CTR 23- 4100- 614 -61
LANDSCAPE 9 TURF CHEMICALS 27-4564-662-66
1Q05 C.
JF EDINA
CHECK R.
TER
07 -15 -85 .oE 19
t
--CHECK N0:
-OA-T£
AMOUN-T
-- VEb04i---------
s -TcM- OES£R- I-PT4ON -- AC -COU- iT---NO. -- f4W,m- P -O. -q- MESSAGE --
1y6 /QP
17/10/85
669270.00
- KEHO CONSTRUCTION CO
CONSTRUCTICN- -
27 -1300- 000 -00
"
66,278.33 •
- 196 799----
i}7- /- 1385-
-i;6$
}BART- DVJR4K -- -
JURiEO -SHG4
--23- 3265 - 800 -f0 -- - - - - - -
j. .
- --
7.60 •
j 1960 ^O
57/1 ? /05-
- 73.38
-- MONICA- SULLIVAN
- ART CTR -- SUPPLIES - -- ----
- - -23- 4588- 61 -6 -6 -1
73.38
19o8n1
7/1@4 5-
-- 200;30-
ROBERT- SGoC0VIAK-
-- CLEAN -ING-
23-42 CO- b1- 0- 6- 1------ - - - - -- - -.
200. ^0
196b -2
J7I1 ^ /8`- - - - -
-- -- 44n;90 --
-ERTC- ANDERSON - -
- CCNT-SERY - - - - -
10- 4200- 500 - -50- -
440.80 *
- 196803 -- --
- X7110-/8 5
- 14.-5
T- Y-DEPT- -U F--
POS -TA GE
10 -42 -90 -4-40 4 -- -
14.56
196 °r4
.;7/10/p5 - --
- 1.183;75-----
FRANK-8 FALL CO -
- - INSURANCE -- - -
- -10 -4260- 510 -51 -- - -
196304
7/10/85
119327.70
FRANK B HALL CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
129510.75 *
+
196205
07/10/85
834.35
L=RSCHEN
CONT SERY
10 -4200- 140 -14 - T
A34.35 *
196806
.17/10/85
233.0
RTW INC
CONT SERY
10- 4200 - 510 -51
I_
196807
07/10/85
923.50
HOWARD M BARD --
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 140 -14 -
923.50
196auR
07/10/85
1379889.75
BROWN B CRIS INC
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
1379889.75 *
t
1968,79
07/10/85
539461.13
BURY & CARLSON
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
`
539461.13 *
e
19681(2
`
07/10/85
19124.13
SARAH CONSTRACTIIG
PAYMENT
6C -2040- 000 -CC
19124.13
196811
07/10/85
429542.8
MIDWEST ASPHALT CO
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -CO -
429542.J8 •
W
196812
07/17/85
24,978.92
EERGERSON CASWELL
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -CC
249978.92 *
196313
u7/10/85
42.78
ALAN SAMUELSON
MILEAGE
10- 4208- 480 -48
`
42.78 *
196814
I
�)1 /10/85
29962.P5
KENNY BOILER & MFG
CCNT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 708 -70
,.�
29962.95 •
r
`
-
66.405.25
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
rr* -CKS
�
�.�
1985 CITY OF EDINA
-
CHECK
-
REGISTER
G7- 1.5 -85 PAGE 20
CHECK -N0;- DATE - -- AMOUNT-
--VEND02--
-
- -- -ITEM DESCRIPTION -
ACCOUNT -NOS INVO- -N-- P.O. - #-MESSAGE - -
69881.?2
FUND
2?
TOTAL
ART CENTER
- -- - - -- 1,205.9n- -------
FUND
26
TOTAL
- StiIMMING rCOL FUND----
-- -
74,754.97
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
3,530.50
FUN
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
- - - " - -- - - - -- - 1-41511:46
—FUND
4C-TOTAL-
- - - - -- UTILITY- FUND--- - - - - - --
899437.R8
FUND
50
TCTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
,i 2969965.50
FUND
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
- - -- -- - -- -- -- 7x265.99 - -
-- - FUND
•66
TOTAL
.-..IMP BOND -- REDEMPTION- #2-----
.. - -. -- -.._
- __ -- - 58 ^_,959.57
TOTAL
Computer checks Vs
-
- --
- - —
- 64685-thru 64916 -- -- -
MENT
y ,
PAGES, -- ---- -
-.
D.AiE '
is—-- — — -- -- ---
— . -
- - ---
INANCE DIREi;iOR DAT
i