HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 19, 1985
7:00 P.M.
JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ROLLCALL
I. AMENDMENT OF SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
II. SALE OF LAND BY CITY OF EDINA TO HRA
ADJOURNMENT
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Neil Jahr
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of July 15, 1985, and Special Meetings of July 22,
1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. AWARD OF BIDS - $12,000,000 General - Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985
$ 1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Wooddale Park Improvements (Cont'd from 8/5/85)
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. First Reading
a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence -
Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd St.
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Indian Hills 3rd Addition - Gustafson and Associates - Generally located
south of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road
C. Final Development Plan
1. PCD -4 Planned.Commercial District.- Richard Page - Generally located
east of Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street
2. Planned Industrial District - Hoyt Construction - Generally located
south of West 78th Street and east of Cahill Road
D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Ten Year Capital Improvement Program
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
V. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Engine Analyzer (Cont'd from 8/5/85) (All bids to be rejected)
B. Administrative Vehicle
VI.. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 13, 1985
B. Boards /Commissions Appointment Process
C. Set Budget Hearing Dates
1. Budget Submittal (9/9/85)
2. Proposed First Hearing (9/16/85)
D. Review of EIS - Homart Development
E. Construction.Manager - Braemar Clubhouse Addition
F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Edina City Council
Agenda
August 19, 1985
Page Two
VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Resolution Authorizing Dispatch and Use of City Equipment and Services
by City Manager in Emergency Situations
VIII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second
Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four- fifths (4 /5).favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 118 - Moratorium on Skateboard Ramps
IX. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of
the following claims dated 8/19/85: General Fund'$232,087.24, Park
Fund $60.00, Art Center $785.17, Swimming Pool Fund $1,529,15, Golf
Course Fund $19,994.38, Recreation Center Fund $9,207.41, Gun Range
Fund $29.40, Utility Fund $19,622.75, Liquor Dispensary Fund $116,594.43,
Construction Fund $214,184.99, Total $614,134.92.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday Sept 2 LABOR DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Monday Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday Sept 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
(Special Assessments Hearing)
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 19, 1985
7:00 P.M.
JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ROLLCALL
* I. AMENDMENT OF SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
* II. SALE OF LAND BY CITY OF EDINA TO HRA
ADJOURNMENT
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Neil Jahr
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of July 15, 1985, and Special Meetings of July 22,
1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. AWARD OF BIDS - $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985
$ 1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
II.. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment.heard. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass
if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
* A. Wooddale Park Improvements (Cont'd from 8/5/85)
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths -(4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. First Reading
* a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence -
Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd St.
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Indian Hills 3rd Addition - Gustafson and Associates - Generally located
south of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road
C. Final Development Plan
* 1. PCD -4 Planned.Commercial District.- Richard Page - Generally located
east of Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street
* 2. Planned Industrial District - Hoyt Construction - Generally located
south of West 78th Street and east of Cahill Road
* D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Ten Year Capital Improvement Program
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
V. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Engine Analyzer (Cont'd from 8/5/85) (All bids to be rejected)
* B. Administrative Vehicle
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 13, 1985
* B. Boards /Commissions Appointment Process
C. Set Budget Hearing Dates
1. Budget Submittal (9/9/85)
2. Proposed First Hearing (9/16/85)
* D. Review of EIS - Homart Development
* E. Construction Manager - Braemar Clubhouse Addition
F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Edina City Council
Agenda
August 19, 1985
Page Two
VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Resolution Authorizing Dispatch and Use of City Equipment and Services
by City Manager in Emergency Situations
VIII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second
Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. First Reading
* 1. Ordinance No. 118 - Moratorium on Skateboard Ramps
IX. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of
the following claims dated 8/19/85: General Fund $232,087.24, Park
Fund $60.00, Art Center $785.17, Swimming Pool Fund $1,529,15, Golf
Course Fund $19,994.38, Recreation Center Fund $9,207.41, Gun Range
Fund $29.40, Utility Fund $19,622.75, Liquor Dispensary Fund $116,594.43,
Construction Fund $214,184.99, Total $614,134.92.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday Sept 2 LABOR DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED
Monday Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Monday Sept 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
(Special Assessments Hearing)
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 15, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Turner and Mayor Courtney-
MINUTES of the Regular and Special Meetings of June 17, 1985 were approved as
submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A5 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING; PRD -3 ZONING APPROVED FOR FOSTER
GREEN ADDITION (BRUTGER COMPANIES). Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the subject
.property.is located.west of Cahill Road and .south of.Dewey.Hill Road.. At its
June 17., 1985 meeting, the Council had heard the request for .final rezoning and
preliminary plat approval and had referred the matter back to the staff and the
Community Development and Planning Commission to consider changes to the landscap-
ing plan so that it would be consistent with adjoining properties and to allow an
opportunity for the residents of the adjoining condominiums to comment on the plan.
Brutger representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood Condominiums and
Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday, June 24, 1985. At the Planning Commission
meeting on June 26, 1985 the developer presented a revised landscape plan. Also
submitted at that meeting were.petitions from residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums
in opposition to the proposed development. The Planning Commission also received
a letter from the president of Windwood Condominiums Association approving the
revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the revised landscape plan
substantially increases the sizes of the stock and also increases the number of
plantings.and emphasizes perimeter screening on the north, west and south sides of
the development. The Planning Commission at its meeting on June 26 recommended
approval of the revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen clarified that the referral to
the Planning Commission was for review of the landscape plan and that the request
before the Council now is for final rezoning and preliminary plat approval. Mayor
Courtney stated that he had received many letters from adjoining residents, copies
of which have been provided.to the Council-Members. Bob Gunderson, attorney for
Brutger Companies, noted that the concept for the project has been approved, sub-
ject to further review of the landscape plan and that the developer had met with
the adjoining residents for their comments. Steve Wilson, Brutger Companies,
stated that some changes have been made to the landscape plan and in meeting with
representatives from the Windwood Association they have found it acceptable as
indicated in the letter from the president of the Association. dated June 26, 1985.
In the meeting with representatives of Dewey Hill Condominiums, the conversation
tended to move away from the landscape plan,and there was no resolve of the matter.
Mr. Wilson then.reviewed the landscape plan pointing out the changes in type, size
and number of trees-and submitted that it is now compatible with the landscaping
found on adjacent properties. Mayor Courtney stated that from the letters he had
received the chief objection to the development was that townhouses were proposed
rather than a condominium building such as Dewey Hills Condominiums. Voicing their
concerns and objections were Alvin.Piiller,.Jack._Forciea and Albert Levine of 5501
Dewey Hill Road, and Alvyn Pope of 5601 Dewey Hill Road. Mr.' Gunderson responded
that the project will offer new housing for families to enter Edina and support
the community, that the development is.a quality project and will bring in quality
people. No further comments being heard, Member Turner moved Second Reading and
adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A5 as follows:
ORDINANCE No. 825 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -3) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet of the North 30 acres of the
NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
7/15/85
Member Turner commented that each of the Council Members has listened to the
concerns expressed, has viewed the property and area, and reviewed the land -.
scape plan. The proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and
the Comprehensive Plan and the density is appropriate. Regarding the traffic
concerns raised, Member Turner stated that if warranted we have measures for
reviewing increased traffic and the need for some kind of control. Member Kelly
commented that the Council must be guided by the Comprehensive Plan in attempting
to deliver various types of housing for the community and that -she is satisfied
that it.will:.be a first class project. There were no further comments.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved.and_ ordered placed on.file. Planner presented the
proposed plat for the Foster Green Addition, generally located west of Cahill
Road and.south of Dewey Hill Road, which illustrated a lot for each individual
building and all other property would remain as an outlot and be controlled by
a condominium association. The site plan illustrates 26 townhouse units and
24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven buildings. Albert
Levine, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, stated his objections to the proposed plat. He __
said there should only be one curb cut onto Cahill Road, that guest parking was at
a bare minimum, that the northwest building should be set back further, and that
there was an intense use of ground cover and urged the Council to limit the
number of units.to be placed upon the site. No further comments being heard,
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Foster Green Addition ", platted by Brutger Companies, Inc.,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be
and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
presented the petition for preliminary plat approval noting that the subject
property is located south of Grove Street and on the east end of the cul -de -sac
on Oak Lane. The property is part of an.earlier subdivision of the area and
measures 138 feet in width, 239 feet in depth and is 33,057 square feet in size.
The proponent is requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable lot
of 12,237 square feet with the remaining 20,830 square feet designated as an
outlot. A previous replat of this property included the dedication of an
extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way must be
acquired before this could take place. The property is now accessed by a
temporary cul -de -sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner of the property.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proponent's intent is to create one buildable lot
while reserving the balance of the property for future subdivision. Since the
balance of the property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable
without replatting. The lot size of the proposed lot is similar to other lots
in the vicinity. At its June 26, 1985 meeting, the Community Development and
Planning commission approved.the preliminary plat. No comment being heard, Member
Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Austin Replat", platted by Curtis E. Austin,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be
and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member..Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A7 GRANTED FIRST READING; R -1 to R -2 ZONING FOR ROBERT ANDERSON
(425 WASHINGTON AVENUE). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved
and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is
located at the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County Road 18 is
located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is to the south.
The property is a vacant lot measuring 70 feet in width, approximately 125 feet
in depth and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. Robert Anderson, proponent,
is requesting rezoning of the site from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2
Double Dwelling Unit District to allow the construction of a two -unit dwelling.
This request was heard at the May 20, 1985 Council Meeting at which time the motion
for rezoning failed. At its meeting of June 3, 1985, the Council took action to
7/15./85
re -hear the request. Mr. Larsen pointed out that on the two -block stretch of
Washington Avenue there exists a variety of R -1 lots and R -2 lots. Currently,
there are six R -2 lots ranging in.width from 76 feet to 124 feet with most being
76 to 79 feet in width. There are eleven existing R -1 lots ranging between
45 and 78 feet in width. Lots fronting on Washington Avenue are shown by the
Comprehensive Plan as suitable for conversion to this type of use.. Since the
last Council Meeting the proponent has presented a petition from several neighbors
in the area in support of his petition for the rezoning. The Community Develop-
ment and Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. Mr—Larsen-noted that,
if the Council were to approve rezoning, the request would still have to petition
the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances for lot width and lot size.
Robert Anderson, the proponent, referred to the photograph he had submitted to
the Council and said the proposed dwelling would be similar and that he understood
that the plans would have to be approved by the Board of Appeals. He added that
he had talked to his neighbors and no one objected to the double unit dwelling.
No further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A7
for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
Lot 14 and the south 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 9, "West Minneapolis
Heights ", except that part of said Lot 14 lying southwesterly of a
line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00
feet north from the southwest-corner of said Lot 14 to a point on the
south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east from the southwest
corner of said Lot 14."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner who commented
that she supported the proposal for the reasons that it is a transitional area, it
is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as low density attached residential and
that the proposed dwelling is appropriate for this site because of the busy highway
and other doubles in the area and that, even thought variences are required, it
would not set a precedence. Mayor Courtney said he agreed with Member Turner..
Rollcall•
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CREEK VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH (6400 TRACY.AVE.)
Planner Larsen presented the request of the Creek Valley Baptist Church, located
at 6400 Tracy Avenue, for a Conditional Use Permit. Creek Valley Baptist Church
is proposing construction of additional classroom space, restrooms and general
storage. The addition would contain a total of 3,780 square feet, 2,680 square
feet of which would be on the main floor, and would be to the south of the existing
structure. All classroom activities are currently held in the basement. No other
changes to the site are contemplated at this time. The Zoning Ordinance requires
a Conditional Use Permit for any expansion of a church in the R -1 District. Based
on the 132 seats in the sanctuary, 44 parking spaces should be provided. The exist-
ing parking lot provides parking for 53 cars. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the
church is situated in a relatively isolated location. To the west and south are
City owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown Highway. The site
contains mature landscaping that provides additional screening. The design and
materials of the addition will match the existing building and parking will be
provided in adequate.numbers. The Community Development and Planning Commission
heard the request at its meeting of June 26, 1985 and recommends approval. No
comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met, and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Condi-
tional Use Permit to the Creek Valley Baptist Church at 6400 Tracy Avenue for the
purpose of constructing a 3,780 square foot addition to their existing building,
according to plans submitted;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Permit be subject to the following condition:
1) Building materials for the addition must match the existing materials.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
7/15/85
.
UPDATE GIVEN ON WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland advised that the Wooddale - Edinamite
event held on July 13, 1985, as a goodbye to the school and a benefit for The
Edina Foundation, was a success. He has met with representatives of St. Stephens
Episcopal Church, 50th and Wooddale Avenues, regarding the parking lots - 42
spaces in Wooddale Park and 52 spaces in Utley Park, estimated at a cost of
approximately $100,000 and they have indicated that they feel the church will
participate in an assessment project for the parking lots, payable over 20 years.
Mr. Kojetin has met with the neighborhood group and they have concluded that the
park plans fit well with one exception. They are concerned about the total amount
of-parking between the two parks. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the existing
parking now at Wooddale School consists of 88 spaces so, basically, the church
would be preserving the present parking. Mr. Rosland suggested that the Council
hold a hearing so that the neighborhood residents could offer their comments
regarding the parking improvements.. Following some discussion, it..was informally
agreed to place the Wooddale Park improvements on the August 5, 1985 Council
agenda and to notify the Country Club District and immediate adjoining residents.
BID AWARDED FOR REMOVAL AND BACKFILL OF WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for the removal and backfill of Wooddale School showing Carl
Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500.00, Minnesota Lumber & Wrecking Corporation
at $127,955.00, Doty & Sons, Inc. at $163,000.00 and Duluth Superior Erection
at $174,500.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award
of bid to recommended low bidder, Carl Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TWO FALLS MODEL TAH -9 WINGS FOR SNOW PLOWS. Mr. Rosland pre-
sented tabluation of bids for two Falls Model TAH -9 Wings for snow plows showing
LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00 and Little Falls Machine at $7,410.00.
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to
recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR TO PUMP FOR WELL #6. Mr. Rosland advised that
emergency repairs were required for the pump for well X66. Tabulations of bids
showed Layne Minnesota, Inc. at $6,855.00, Keys Well Drilling at $8,275.00, and
E. H. Renner & Sons at $8,050.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member
Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota, Inc. at
$6,855.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JULY 9, 1985 APPROVED. Member Kelly's motion
was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action as
listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 9, 1985:
1) That NO PARKING ANYTIME signs be installed along the east and north sides of
Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Olinger Road simultaneously with the
opening of the Bredesen Park parking lot,
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER FIVE YEAR PLAN REPORT GIVEN. Michael Kelly, Chairman of
the Edina Community Center Advisory Board ( ECCAB), advised.that the ECCAB is
appointed by the school superintendent and has been in existence for four years.
Initially the ECCAB was responsible for all the closed schools in addition to
operating the Edina Community Center. Mr. Kelly stated that the parking problem
will be.-alleviated by the addition of the new parking lots which will provide
230 additional spaces and the re- striping of the South View parking lot will
double the capacity.for overflow parking from the Community Center. The task of
the ECCAB this year was to develop a.Five Year Plan of operations and recommenda-
tions related to the long term structure of a Community Center for the City of
Edina. A conceptual outline which was presented to the ECCAB in 1984-was _
summarized.with..the.comment that it formed the basis for the recommendations and
the Plan.. Graphics were presented showing Community Center space use, both
leaseable and non - leasable; hours of scheduled use; actual area use versus
potential use; projected use for next five years; five year expense summary of
capital improvements totaling $464,764; rental operation financial overview and
organizational structure. Mr. Kelly gave a.summary of the Board's recommendations
as follows: 1) A non - profit Edina Community Center entity be established to be the
responsible operating entity for the Center, 2) The School District and the City
of Edina be equal direct participants in the governance of the entity, 3) The
School District lease the Community Center building and appurtenant land to the
non - profit entity for 20 years or longer for $1.00 /yr., 4) The School District
.7/15/85
lease space back that is currently occupied and used by the District, 5) The School
District and the City support the capital needs of the Community Center, 6) The
five year operating budget be adopted, and 7) The principal planning recommendations
be adopted. Mr. Kelly stated they are hoping to have the building in operation as
an independent entity by the end of 1985. The Community Center has had a success-
ful beginning under the auspices of the District. It is an active facility, with
enough experience in operation to assure its future and is now ready to become a
true community directed facility. This information has been presented to the
School Board. The District plarsto work with the City on a planning committee level
to talk about a joint participation in the operation of this facility as a community
center. No action was taken by the Council.
AIRPLANE NOISE OVER CITY DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney,stated that he has received many
telephone calls from residents regarding the increased aircraft noise over the City.
Mr. Rosland pointed out several factors which have contributed to this: 1) there
are more flights in and out of the metropolitan airport, 2) recent heat /humidity
do not give the planes -lift and 3) wind conditions mandate use of the main runway.
In discussing the problem with the staff, the following suggestions were made:
1) Staff will attend the meeting of local and state officials representing the
communities surrounding the airport to be held at Richfield City Hall on July 25,
2) If, in fact, the airport authorities are moving the flights around to distribute.
the noise burden, they should publically inform the populace of their procedures so
that people can understand what is happening, and 3) A report will be brought back
to the Council. No formal action was taken.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR NUMEROUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. As recommended by staff,
Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR
GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -174
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L -25, L -26
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for
the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter recorded, and
the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels
of land within the'districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed
assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby approved and
the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection
pending hearings thereon as herein provided.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hearing
form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's
action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in accord-
ance with law is hereby approved. Notices being as follows:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS
Grading Improvement No. C -141.
Watermain Improvement No. WM -352
Street Improvement No. BA -137A.
Maintenance Improvement No. M -85.
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -368
Storm Sewer Improvement No. St. S -174.
Street Lighting Improvement Nos. L -25, L -26.
EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina,
Minnesota on Monday, September 16, 1985, at 7:00 P.M. to hear and pass upon
objections, if any to the following proposed assessments. These assessments
are now on file in the office at the Edina City Clerk and open to public inspect-
ion. Assessment on the following will be payable in one equal installment with
interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 112 %.per annum from the date of
the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1986.
1. CONSTRUCTION OF MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85.
District description: 50TH STREET AND FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT.
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 21,
22 and South 422 feet of Lot 20 and North '7-2 feet of Lot 23, except road; that part
of Lot 24 lying South of the North 37 feet of Lot 24; Lot 25 and North 147 feet of
Lot 29 and East 1 foot of North 147 feet of Lot 30; Lot 26 thru 28 and South 3 feet
7/15/85
-•
of Lot 29 also West 65 feet of South 119.9 feet of Lot 30. and East 1 foot of South
133 feet of Lot 30 except street; West 119.9 feet of Lot 33; South 126 feet of Lot
34 and East 13 feet of Lot 35; West 28 feet of East 41 feet of South 90 feet of Lot
35; commencing at a point in South line of Lot 35 distance 41 feet West from South-
east corner thereof thence North 90 feet thence East 28 feet thence North 36 feet
thence West to East line of West 74.2 feet of Lot 35, thence North along said East
line to North line of South 160.3 feet of Lot 35 thence West along North line to
West line thereof thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence East to beginning
also that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Easterly of a line running from a
point in South line thereof distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner thereof to
a point in North line thereof distance 21.45 feet West from Northeast corner thereof;
East 85 feet of West 120 feet of East 172 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot
36 except.street; that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Westerly of a line
running from a point in South line distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner
thereof to.a point in North line thof distance 21.45 feet West from Northeast corner
thereof.except street; that part of the following described premises lying below the
elevation of 899 feet mean sea level 1929 adjustment: the South 43.5 feet of North
166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172
and the South 2 feet of East 6 feet of North 166.5'feet of Lot 43 and that part of
Lot 43 lying South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey
1426 and Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly and Easterly corner of
Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on the East line of West 107 feet of
Lot 44, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line
thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 lying South of North
123 feet thereof; Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 and the North 166.5 feet of
East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdividion No. 172 and that part of Lot 43 lying
South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and
Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly & Easterly corner of Tract A,
Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line thereof
except that part of the above described premises lying below the elevation of 899
feet mean sea level 1929 adjustment described as follows: the South 43.5 feet of
North 166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43 and the South 2 feet
of East 6 feet of North 166.5 feet of Lot 43 and that part of Lot 43 lying South of
North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and Northerly of a
line drawn from the most Southerly & Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land
Survey 1426 to a point on the East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44 distance 181.05
feet North of South line thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey
1426 lying South of North 123 feet thereof; West 107 feet of North 120 feet of Lot
44; that part of Lot 45 described as commencing at a point in Northwest corner of
Lot 47 thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence West 13.9 feet thence South
1.1 feet thence West 36.1 feet thence South 2.4 feet thence West to a point 7 feet
East from West line of Lot 45 thence North 134.75 feet thence West 4 feet thence
North to South line of West 50th Street thence East 87 feet thence South to be-
ginning; South 70 feet of East 150 feet of Lot 45 and North 2 feet of East 1/2 of
Lot 49; North 102 feet of East 1/2 of South 1/2 of Lot 49 except road; commencing
at a point in East line of.Lot 49 distance 2 feet South from Northeast corner
thereof thence South 40.16 feet thence West to a point in West line of East 1/2 of
Lot 49 distance 43.3 feet South from Northwest corner thereof thence North 41.3
feet to a point 2 feet South from North line of said Lot thence East to beginning;
South 177.5 feet of Lot 31 except street; South 177 1/2 feet of Lot 32 and that
part of the North 1/2 of Lot 34 lying East of West 14.75 feet thereof and South
of Allatas 1st Addition except street; thence West 49 feet of Lot 47 and that part
of the East 51 feet of Lot 47 lying North of the South 2.45 feet thereof; the
North 113 feet of the South 183 feet of East 150 feet of Lot 45, Auditor's Sub-
division No. 172 except that part,thereof below the elevation of 897 feet above
mean sea level and lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at
the Northeast corner of said South 183 feet thence on an assumed bearing of 50
degrees 20 minutes 20 seconds along the East line of Lot 45 a distance of 4.15
feet to the point of beginning of the line being described thence West 48.18
feet thence Westerly 49.02 feet along a tangential curve to the left with a
radius of 101.29 feet thence South 62 degrees 16 minutes 17 seconds West to a
distance of 32.39 feet thence Southwesterly 43.93 feet along a tangential
curve to the left with a radius of 50 feet to the West line of the East 150 feet
of Lot 45 and there ending; East 52 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot
36 except street, all.in Auditor's Subdivision No. 172; Lot 8, Lund Kruse Addition;
Tract C, Registered Land Survey 1426; Lot 1 and the West 35 feet of East 172 feet
of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 except
street; Replat Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition; Lot 1, Block 1, Steven's First.
2. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -25
District description: Between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Avenue.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: West 1/2 of Lot 2, Block 2;
West 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 2; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3;
NORMANDALE ADDITION.
7/15/85
3. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -26.
District description: Corner of Ashcroft Lane and West 63rd Street.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lot 19, Block 2; Lot 8, Block 3;
VALLEY VIEW RIDGE ADDITION; Lot 16, Block 3; Lot 1, Block 4; VALLEY VIEW RIDGE 2ND
ADDITION.
Assessment on the following will'be payable in three equal installments over a
period of three (3) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of
112% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31,
1986.
4. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,,2-,7,8, Block 1,
MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
5. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1,
MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
6. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141.
District description: Arthur.Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1,
MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
7.. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. ST.S. -174.
District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition.
The area proposed to be assessed is as follows_: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1,
MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION.
Assessment on the following will be'payable in ten equal installments over a
period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of
112% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31,
1986.
8. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A.
District description: Hansen Road from Vernon Avenue to West 60th Street.
The area proposed'to be assessed is as follows: Commencing at West line of Gov't
Lot 6 at a point 143.95 feet South from the Northwest corner of South 1/2 of Lot 6,
thence East 327.9 feet to a point in the West line of Block 4, Codes Highview Park
distance 143.87 feet South from the North line of South 1/2 of Gov't Lot 6, thence
South along West line of said Block 4, a distance of 123.87 feet, thence West 327.9
feet to a point in the West line of Lot 6, distance 123.95 feet South from beginning,
thence North to beginning except road; SEC. 33, TWP 117, RANGE 21 (33- 117- 21 -32- 0001);
Lots 7 thru 12, Block 3, CODES HIGHVIEW PARK ADDITION; Lot 1 (that part of the South
16 rods lying East of RR right of way); Lots 2 and 3,-Block 1, EMIL P. ERICKSON
ADDITION; Lot 6 (South 135 feet of North 202.7 feet lying East of RR right of way);
that part of Lot 6 lying East of RR right of way and North of South 399 feet thereof
also that part of Lot 7 lying E of RR right of way; that part of the North 202.7 feet
of Lot 6 and of Lots 7,8 and 9 lying West of a line described as follows: .Commencing
at a point 55.6 feet West from West line of RR right of way and 264 feet North from
South line of Lot 6, thence North 30 East 146 feet thence North 200 East 630 feet,
thence North parallel with East line of Garden Park Addition to South line of Eden
Prairie Road, all in GARDEN PARK ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, E.V. KLOPP'S SUB-
DIVISION; Lots 11 thru 16, Block 3, MELODY KNOLLS SIXTH ADDITION; Lots 1 and 2,
NAOMI ADDITION; Lot 1 and West 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, HAYDEN ADDITION; Lot 1 and
adjacent part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right of way; Lot 2 and South
90 feet of North 190 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right
of way; Lot 3 and South 109 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of
RR right of way; Lot 4, all in Block 1, THEO. NELSON'S ADDITION; Lots 13,14 and that
part of Gov't Lot 3 lying Northwesterly of M.N. &S. RR right of way as widened except
road, Lots 15 and 16, RICHMOND HILLS THIRD ADDITION; Lots 5 thru 8, Block 1, TOWN'S
FIRST EDINA ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES BERG REPLAT; Lots 7 thru
9, Block 7, WESTCHESTER KNOLLS ADDITION; Lots 1,2,5, Block 1, WOODY POINT ADDITION.
First - payment of these assessments will be payable with the taxes for the year 1985
collectible in 1986. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the
same rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of the property
assessed for the above improvements may pay the'whole of the assessment without
interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1985, or make payment with
accrued interest to the County Treasurer. Any owner may appeal the assessment to
the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.`081, by serving
notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty
(30) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing
such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the
Mayor or Clerk.
However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection
signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of
Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing.
7/15/85
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,.the City of Edina.has adopted standards and guide-
lines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons
65 years of age or older for whom payments would be a hardship. To obtain deferment,
application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on
the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph
of this notice. For further information and application forms, please call or visit
the City Assessor's office.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BLAKE SCHOOL REQUEST FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS DISCUSSED. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City
Manager, advised.that Blake Schools, Hopkins, has requested the use of a portion
of the streetcar right of way which is located on the south.side.of the Blake
.Schools property to route school bus traffic out the southwest corner of their
parking lot. The proposed school bus exit route would be onto the vacated street-
car right of way, existing onto Second Street South. Edina and Hopkins each own
a portion of the streetcar right of way. The distance from the parking lot to
the street is approximately 400 feet. Currently, it is being used as a bike path.
A public informational meeting was held by Blake Schools for concerned neighbors
on July 10, 1985. The request is presented so that if there is the possibility
for the City of Edina to grant permission for the subject area to be improved to
accommodate.bus: traffic, staff would suggest a public hearing be set for August 5,
1985 with notices to abutting property owners on the Edina side. Mr. Hughes noted
that Marlys Canter and Mr. Stoddard were present representing Blake Schools. In
response to Member Kelly's question as to the amount of bike traffic, Mr. Hughes
said it was substantial and was an active bike trail. He pointed out that the
greater concern was unauthorized use by cars and other.vehicles trying to short
cut into the school parking lot. Attorney Erickson submitted that there might be
a legal problem with allowing a private use of public property. Member Kelly
made a motion setting a public hearing on the matter for August 5, 1985 if the
City Attorney determines that there is no legal,problem with the proposed use of
public property. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS MADE TO EDINA FOUNDATION AND HEALTH BOARD; FOUNDATION BY -LAW CHANGES
DISCUSSED; OTHER VACANCIES CONTINUED. Mayor Courtney recalled that at its last
meeting, the Council informally agreed to hold the appointment of two directors
to The Edina Foundation so that the matter of staggered terms could be determined
and to see if any other individuals are interested..in serving on the Board. After
a brief discussion, Member Kelly made a motion that Robert Sherman and John Skager-
berg be.reappointed to The Edina Foundation Board for terms to be established by
the amended Bylaws.. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen..
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
James Van Valkenburg, President of The Edina Foundation, reported that he had met
with the School Board regarding proposed changes to the Bylaws_ :They had agreed
that.the Bylaws be amended.to stagger the .terms so that in any given year one repre-
sentative from the School District, the City, and the membership at large is
appointed. Also discussed.was .the matter of residency and number of successive
terms. The School Board had indicated that six board members should be residents
of the City and that ten years should be the maximum for serving on the Foundation
Board. It-was'informally agreed that draft Bylaws should :beprepared reflecting
the changes as directed by the Council and the School Board. Mayor Courtney
then submitted that Eileen Cooke, 3705 W. 61st Street, had submitted her name for
appointment to the Advisory Board of Health. Motion of Member Turner was seconded
by Member Kelly appointing Eileen Cooke to the Advisory Board of Health for an
unexpired term to February 1, 1986.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Mayor Courtney pointed out that there is a vacancy on the Community Development
and Planning Commission and also on the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and that
a number of.individuals have submitted their names for appointment. It was
informally agreed to ask those individuals who have not done so to submit back-
ground information /resumes to aid the Council in making the appointments at the
next Council meeting.
CONSUMER DEPOSIT LEVIED AGAINST WEST i OF LOT 5, BLOCK 3, AND EAST 30 FEET OF
LOT 1, BLOCK 4, WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET. Mr. Rosland advised that a
request has been to allow Sheryl L. and David M. Waterman, 3800 West 55th Street,
7/15/85
to pay the water connection charge from Watermain No. 335 to their property,
the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3 and the East 30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury
Park near Lake Harriet, over a.,,period of six years at the applicable interest
rate. It was explained that this is a longer run connection than normal and
connection charge would be a consumer deposit so that if the watermain is ever
extended in the future, a portion of the deposit would be refundable. Member
Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assessment
of a consumer deposit for water connection for Watermain No. 335 in the amount
of $2,645.62 to be levied against the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3, and the East
30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury Park near Lake Harriet over a six -year period
at an interest rate of 711%....
Rollcall:
.Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
UMBRELLA INSURANCE DISCUSSED; LIABILITY INSURANCE CAP OF $500,000 AFFIRMED.
Mr. Rosland advised that a quote for $1,000,000 umbrella insurance has been received.
The cost would be $77,000, plus an additional $20,000 to bring the Police liability
up to $1,000,000. A.major condition is that the City would be required to purchase
additional coverage to bring the City's liability insurance up to $1,000,000. This
additional coverage was quoted at $82,000. The net result would be that in order
to purchase the $1,000,000 umbrella, the final cost would be $179,000. Staff would
not recommend this option. As an alternative, because the City's current liability
coverage is $500,000 and does not meet the liability cap set by the State of
$200,000/600,000, it is recommended that we bring the City's liability coverage up
to $1,000,000 and not purchase the excess umbrella coverage. The cost to the City
under this option would be $82,000 and would put our level of liability in excess of
the State cap. Attorney Erickson explained that the courts have been acting pro-
spectively rather than retroactively to impose liability where people have been
acting reasonably upon the statutory limitations. He pointed out that if the City
brought their liability coverage up to $1,000,000 it would.be covered as to tort__.
liability.by exceeding the statutory minimum.except for one area. The statute also
recently added a third catagory of liability for cities which was the release or
threatened release of toxic substances which established the maximum liability at
twice the liability for other kinds of torts. Therefore, the City would have a
possible exposure for hazardous substances of $1,200,000. Mr. Rosland advised that
insurance companies at the present time will not write hazardous substances insur-
ance. If the Council elected not to increase the City's liability coverage, it
would in effect be self- insuring for any judgment over the City's coverage. After
further discussion, Member Bredesen made a motion to stay with the current liability
coverage of $500,000 and not to purchase the umbrella coverage as quoted. Motion
was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Bredesen asked that the staff document the..City's..risk management program
f6r.review by the .Council at its August.5,.1985 meeting to determine if it is
adequate, that it is documented and that a rational person would agree that the
City took reasonable steps to prevent loss problems from occuring.
FEASIBILITY REPORT ON STREET & BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (WEST 44TH STREET) APPROVED;
HEARING DATE SET. Engineer Hoffman presented a Feasibility Report on street and
bridge replacement for West 44th Street from.T.H. 100 to the Soo Line Railroad,
advising that the project was previously approved by the Council but reconfir-
mation is required prior to bid opening. The report also recommended sidewalk
repair at various locations in the Country Club District— Member Bredesen intro-
duced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -262
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -34
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed Street and Bridge Replacement and Sidewalk
Replacement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to
the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed
to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, August 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be
not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to
all affected properties in substantially the following form:
7/15/85
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -262
S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -34
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 5,
1985, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements.are estimated by the City as set
forth below:
West 44th Street - T.H. 100 to Brookside Court
ESTIMATED COST
Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete
Curb and Gutter - Improvement No. P -BA -262 $323,404.87
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed
improvements includes Lot 17 and 19, Aud. Sub'd. No. 176; Lots 10 and 11,
Thielen's Brookside; Lots 7 and 8, Subd. No. 176; Lots 1, 2, and 3,
Block 4, Arden Park -Third Addition; and Lots l and 2, Block.3, Arden Park
3rd Addition.
Country Club District
ESTIMATED COST
Sidewalk. Replacement Improvement No. P -S -34 115,338.88
The area proposed to be assessed includes all properties in the Country Club
District, Brown Section and Fairway District.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR EDINBOROUGH UTILITIES AND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO SOUTH-
EAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was
seconded by Member Kelly, setting August 19, 1985, as hearing date for Edin-
borough utilities and amendment to Agreement to Southeast Edina Redevelopment.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON EDINA PROSECUTION. Mr. Rosland stated that, in response to the
Council's request, a report has been prepared on the matter of Edina prosecution
and resulting costs which in 1985 have been running above the.--amount budgeted.
In preparing the 1986 Budget, the Council may wish to consider a policy question
on the degree of enforcement the City should pursue. Mr. James Van Valkenburg
reviewed the report noting in particular the increased number of DWI citations
and a total of 12,243 citations issued by the Police Department in 1984. He also
pointed out the complex procedure of a file through the court system. Mr. Marsh
Hallberg, Prosecuting Attorney, commented that there is a trend towards requiring
community service of defendants instead of imposing fines resulting in reduced
revenues. Personalities involved in the court system also have a great effect
upon how efficiently the system may run which also affects revenues. Member
Bredesen commented that, if the public policy of.the State is .to- encourage cities
to prosecute DWIs and other offenses and then impose a financial penalty for
strict enforcement, this should be addressed to our representatives in the
legislature; that the residents of the City should not be forced to pay the cost
associated with DWI prosecution through their tax levy:, He suggested-that a
letter communicating this be sent to our representatives and /or the Municipal
Legislative Commission. No formal action was taken.
FIRE DEPT ORGANIZATION /PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; CONT'D TO 7/22/85. Mr. Rosland
stated that the paramedic program has been under discussion for several years
and that the Council, after consideration of alternatives and recommendations,
will decide if the paramedic service will continue to be delivered by the City or
by some alternative system. Mr. Rosland then called on Robert Buresh, Public
Safety Director, to explain the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.
Mr. Buresh explained that the City's authority starts with the State who by
statute regulates EMS at least to the Advanced Life Support (ALS) level. We
also get our authority through an Hennepin County EMS Ordinance which regulates
various aspects of the EMS program. Medical direction comes from a Hennepin
County EMS medical director who monitors all operational aspects of the program.
The records part of the system is regulated through the Community Health Depart-
ment who monitors us via reports in relation to the other ambulance services in
7/15/85
the community. Because the system is complex, the Hennepin County EMS Council
was developed, made up of representatives from all parts of the system, to over-
see the process and the Council is continually reviewing the many aspects of the
system to upgrade it to meet current needs. If the City chooses to give up its
license from the State, we notify the Community Health Department and they in
turn would refer the request to the Zoning Committee of the Council. The Zoning
Committee will evaluate this service area to see where it most likely should go.
Mr. Buresh noted that local requests as to provider usually prevail. In the
alternative, the City could negotiate directly with another provider for EMS
services. Hennepin County is interested in taking over this zone at an estimated
cost of $375,000 per year to operate.one unit around the clock, plus administra-
tive costs for an approximate total of $500,000. It was pointed out that this
would be a lose situation as EMS service in Edina will not generate $500,000 in
revenue. William Feck, Fire - Chiet, then presented graphics showing the following:
1) emergency medical calls and.response times,-2)..1984 costs for 27 -man fire
suppression force and ambulance fee revenues, .3) paramedic program costs for 1984,
27 -man fire suppression force, 4) Edina Fire Department 1985 budget with added
costs for two additional paramedics, 5) paramedic program costs for 1985, 29 -man
suppression force, 6) paramedic program costs and revenues, and 7) comparision
of ambulance service fees. Member Bredesen asked why it is assumed that the fire
force would remain the same if the City were not doing paramedic work-and if the
force were reduced would there not be a major savings in cost. Mr. Buresh responded
that when fire suppression services are inter- related with another service it
becomes more complex. On the fire suppression side, the department is geared up
to handle an initial response to a structural fire of one of Edina's average largest
homes. Anything more than that would be handled by mutual aid. He illustrated
the normal response as set out by the national standards for fire suppression -and
pointed out that problems can develop quickly if you operate with short manpower.
This response requires a team of 10 to 13 firefighters to suppress the fire safely.
It means that 8 men must be scheduled on a day shift to work out vacations /holidays,
plus the chief officer and 3 people in the fire prevention bureau. On evenings and
weekends the schedule can.be stripped.down to a.8-man-.shift because`it:_is easier to
get off -duty response and volunteer help. Mr. Buresh pointed out that there are
6 to 10 working fires per year of this type that involve the entire structure; many.
are caught in the earlier stages. He explained that service levels are a function of
economics, tradition, politics, professional opinion, management, attitudes and related
services. A major factor in keeping the Fire Department budget in line has been
the development of the building inspections program which involves the Department
in plan review of new building construction and remodeling, beginning with Southdale
Center in 1955. Mr. Buresh presented a graphic showing a typical service level
including fire suppression, emergency medical services and fire prevention and
control. The Department has integrated the firefighters into the related services
of the City. If the EMS service.'is reduced, it would give the Department more man -
hours to be involved in other aspects of fire suppression. If the fire suppression
side of the Department is reduced, it would definitely affect the related services.
Mr. Rosland stated that he has been working with John Maloney, union representative,
as to how the union perceives the survival of the paramedic program. They have
proposed the following: 1) paramedics would continue'to be firefighters principally,
2) within three months the City would bring the Department up to 29 men, 3) the City
would maintain at least 3 paramedics per 24 -hour shift and when this number is not
possible, the paramedics on duty would be kept from all but emergency duties; they
would also not be asked to change shifts to avoid this problem, 4) the City would
make every effort to recruit and train paramedics from within the Department, and
5) if the preceding were accomplished, 7 of the presente8 paramedics would.continue
as paramedics through 1986. Mr. Rosland advised that in researching other alter-
natives, there are three other providers, Hennepin County, Smith - Martin and.Fair-
view- Southdale Hospital. He introduced Dr. Timothy Crimmins, emergency physician
at- Fairview- Southdale Hospital, advising: that he=.is the..- new..medical:.;.director for the
paramedic program. Dr. Crimmins stated that he trained at the Hennepin County Medical
Center, is chairman of the Ethics Committee of the EMS Council and has had the oppor-
tunity to observe the EMS system through the metro area and is very familiar with
each of the ambulance services. He identified five areas to.consider when-looking at
ambulance service: 1) how fast can we get an ambulance to the patient's home, to
that instution, to that public place or out on the highway, 2) what quality of
medical care can we deliver once there, 3) professional attitude of the paramedics,
4) what other services can the paramedics provide to the community, and 5) who can
do it at the lowest cost. He evaluated the alternative providers. Smith -Martin,
after investigation by WCCO and alledged serious wrongdoings has been bought out by
another entity and are going through reorganization to improve their quality of care.
Hennepin County Medical Center has excellent quality of care and have good response
times, but not as good as the Edina based service. Hennepin County is a big service
covering a large area.. They are constantly moving.their paramedics around through-
out the system and tend to be a little out of service at times. Dr. Crimmins said
that the Edina paramedics are very familiar with the community and buildings in the
7/15/85
City and know how to get to patients fast, that they have a very professional
attitude, and that by maintaining the service in Edina the City has control of
its funding. The Edina paramedics provide other services to the community,
e.g. fight structural fires, inspect buildings, are involved in community
education and teach CPR to first responders in the community. He also noted
that there is an unseen factor of cooperation with the Police Department. That
the team effort at the scene of an emergency results in better medical care.
Dr. Crimmins stated that he felt the Council should make the commitment to add
at least two paramedics to make.the Edina fire -based system work. James Fel-
senthal, 6936 Hillcrest Lane, made a plea to increase the paramedic force to
insure that the residents of Edina are served properly and promptly in emer-
gency situations. Mr. Rosland recalled that in 1979 a study was made of the
manpower, and organization of the Fire Department and it was felt that the City
could survive the paramedic system with a 29 -man suppression force with help
by re- establishing the volunteer system. That volunteer system has been
established.- Fees for ambulance service have been raised to surpass the county
level and a.tougher collection policy has been adopted. It is estimated that
in 1985 fees will generate revenue in excess of $200,000 which will pay for
two additional paramedics on the regular firefighter salary as well as picking
up approximately the $113,000 cost of the paramedic program. Mr. Rosland said
he would recommend that the City hire two additional paramedics to survive the
fire -based paramedic program. He added that if we find we cannot survive the
program, we would have to look at the size of our fire suppression force and
look at a level of service the City could provide. He stated that there is an
excellent opportunity to work with Fairview - Southdale Hospital to provide EMS
service and that if the Council should decide to look at other, providers, the
staff would like the opportunity to let those providers present a full and
detailed report to the Council as to their EMS services. Douglas Erickson,
5020 Richmond Drive, urged the Council to continue the Edina paramedic program.
Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road, also spoke in support of the recommendation.
Member Bredesen commented that he would like to have time to digest the infor-
mation presented before acting on the recommendation and suggested it be brought
back on the Council agenda or considered at a special meeting. Member Kelly
said she concurred with Member Bredesen. It was informally agreed to continue
the consideration of two additional paramedics to the special meeting scheduled
for July 22, 1985,.at 5:00 p.m. No formal action.was taken.
ORDINANCE REGARDING SPECIAL PURPOSE POOLS TO BE DRAFTED. Member Kelly advised
that she had received a telephone call from a resident concerning requirements
for wading pools. Mr. Rosland advised that an ordinance will be drafted for
the Council's consideration at the next meeting.
UPDATE GIVEN ON PROPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT IN BLOOMINGTON. Mr. Hughes gave a
brief report on the hearing before the Metropolitan Council and their comments
on the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Homart development in
Bloomington. After a brief discussion, it was suggested-that the Mayor again
write a letter to Mayor Lindau of Bloomington with the request that the two
councils meet to discuss the development. Staff was also asked to prepare a
draft of our concerns regarding the density and traffic impact of the project.
No formal action was taken.
ALISON FUHR APPOINTMENT TO REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD SUPPORTED. Mr. Rosland
advised that the Regional Transit Board is meeting on July 22, 1985 to consider
applications for members of the Board whose membership is being reduced from
15 to 9 members. Mrs. Alison Fuhr is currently serving on the Board and would
like to continue. A letter of recommendation on her behalf has been sent to
the Board and she would welcome Council support. No formal action was taken.
AMM SEEKING.MEMBERS TO SERVE ON LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES. Mr. Rosland advised
that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is seeking persons to serve
on various legislative committees. He noted that Member Turner chairs the
Housing Committee. Mayor Courtney said that he has volunteered to serve on
the General Legislation Committee.
MLC LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR JULY 24. Mr. Rosland informed the Council
that the Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee has scheduled a
legislative dinner at the Decathlon Club on July 24, 1985, with Representative
William Schreiber as speaker and asked that the Council Members contact him if
they wish to attend.
HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT REORGANIZATION NOTED. Mr. Rosland said
that the Hennepin County Park Reserve District is re- forming and members of the
Minneapolis Park Board will no longer be serving on the Board after September 1.
In their place, commissioners will be appointed from the suburbs, two to be
7/15/85
appointed by the - Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and one will be appointed
by the four remaining suburban members. The name will be changed to the Suburban
Hennepin Regional.Park District Mayor Courtney said he was interested and would
appreciate the Council's support. Mr. Rosland said he would submit Mayor Courtney's
name to be considered for appointment.
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262. As recommended by staff, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
IMRPOVEMENT NO. BA -262
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262
CONTRACT 485 -8 (ENG)
S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01
BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 7, 1985
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Wednesday, August 7, 1985. The Edina
City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 19, 1985 to consider said
bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
1200 L /F, Concrete Curb and Gutter.
500 Tons, Bituminous Paving
1 Remove Old Bridge and Replacement
600 L /F, 10" Steel H- Piling
79 C /Y, (1A43) Structure Concrete
196 C /Y, (3Y43) Structure Concrete
24,910 Pounds, Reinforcement Bars
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina;
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving
them may be returned unopened.
Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of
$25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and
specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed
and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. The City Council
reserved the right to reject any or all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate
check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for - adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS
AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS: AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND
PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE. Mr. Dalen recommended that the City authorize the
issuance and public sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds to
finance the Edinborough redevelopment project and of $1,200,000 General Obligation
Golf Course Bonds to finance the construction of improvements to Braemar Golf
Course. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
7/15/85
RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985; AND $1,200,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985; AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and beneficial for the City to
construct improvements to the municipal golf course consisting of the construction
of a maintenance building, the upgrading of the par 3 golf. course and the con-
struction of an addition to the clubhouse.
This Council further determines that in order to finance this acquisition and
betterment of recreational facilities for the City of Edina, it is necessary for
the City to issue and sell its General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985
in the principal amount of $1,200,000 (the Golf Course Bonds) pursuant to Minn-
esota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. This Council
estimates that the net revenues derived from the operation of the municipal
liquor stores, in excess of the cost of operation and maintenance thereof, in the
.fiscal year which ended December 31, 1984, equals or exceeds the maximum amount of
principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the out-
standing Golf Course Bonds of the City, dated as of December 1, 1963, on all of
the outstanding Recreation Center Bonds, dated as of November 1, 1978 of the City
and on the Golf Course Bonds, as proposed to be issued under the terms set forth
in this Resolution. Prior to the delivery of the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985,
to the purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the payment of principal
and interest on the Golf Course Bonds. The Council will appropriate and credit
to such fund an amount of revenues of the municipal liquor stores which is equal
to the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Golf
Course Bonds.
2. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and
462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does
authorize the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985 (the Tax Increment Bonds) in the principal amount of $12,000,000 for
the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs
needed for a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, subdivision 10, to be undertaken in accordance with. the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan, within a tax increment financing district, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, previously established by
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina and approved
by the City. The Golf Course Bonds and the Tax Increment Bonds are hereinafter
collectively referred to as the "Bonds ".
3. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.54, subdivision 2, the
maturities of the Tax Increment Bonds are combined with the maturities of the
General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, of the City, for the purpose
of compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.542 sub -.
division 1.
4. It.is hereby determined that this Council shall meet at the City Hall at
7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 19, 1985 to receive, open and consider bids for and
award the sale of the Bonds.
5. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place
and purpose of said sale to be published at least 10 days in advance of the bid
opening in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a
periodical published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, giving financial news and of
general circulation throughout the State, which notice shall be in substantially
the following form:.
NOTICE OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS,
SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the
City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will meet at the City Hall
in Edina, Minnesota at 7:00 o'clock P.M. Central Daylight Time,
on Monday, August 19, 1985, to receive, open and consider the
bids for and award the sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation
Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 and $1,200,000 General
Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 (the Bonds) of the
City. The Golf Course Bonds will be issued for the purpose of
financing the construction of improvements to the City's
municipal golf course, and the Tax Increment Bonds will be
issued for the purpose of financing the public redevelopment
cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance
with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. Dated
September 1, 1985, the Bonds will mature on January 1 in the
following years and amounts:
.7%15/85
$1,200,000 ' $12,000,000 $13,200,000
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually
on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue
maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and
prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part,
and if in part, in inverse order of maturities of this issue and
by lot within maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and
any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the
principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued
to the date of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to
each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney,
of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and
Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained
from the undersigned.
Dated: July 15, 1985.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn,
City Clerk
6. The following shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and
.issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material
distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will
meet at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday,
August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and
award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in
the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by
the City upon the following terms and conditions:
PURPOSE
The Bonds will comprise two issues:
$1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds,
Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961,
Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance
the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf
course; and
$12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985 to be issued to finance the public redevelopment
cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475.
BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT
AND PAYING AGENT
The City will select a suitable bank or trust company
to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the
Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and
interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and
transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The
City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services.
The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint
a successor.
DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION
The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of
September 1, 1985. The Bonds will be issuable only as fully
registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple
thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check
or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is
Golf Course
Tax Increment
Year
Bonds
Bonds
Total
1988
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1989
50:,000
$ 150,000
200,000
1990
50,000
150,000
200,000
1991
50,000
150,000
200,000
1992
50,000
150,000
200,000
1993
100,000
200,000
300,000
1994
100,000
200,000
300,000
1995
100,000
400,000
500,000
1996
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1997
100,000
900,000
11000,000
1998
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
1999
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
2000
150,000
900,000
1,050,000
2001
11000,000
11000,000
2002
11000,000 _
11000,000
2003
11000,000.
11000,000
2004
11000,000
11000,000
2005
1,050,000
1,050,000
2006
1,050,000
1,050,000
$1,200,000 ' $12,000,000 $13,200,000
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually
on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue
maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and
prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part,
and if in part, in inverse order of maturities of this issue and
by lot within maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and
any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the
principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued
to the date of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to
each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney,
of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and
Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained
from the undersigned.
Dated: July 15, 1985.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn,
City Clerk
6. The following shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and
.issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material
distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds.
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE
$12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND
$1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will
meet at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday,
August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and
award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in
the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by
the City upon the following terms and conditions:
PURPOSE
The Bonds will comprise two issues:
$1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds,
Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961,
Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance
the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf
course; and
$12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985 to be issued to finance the public redevelopment
cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475.
BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT
AND PAYING AGENT
The City will select a suitable bank or trust company
to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the
Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and
interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and
transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The
City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services.
The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint
a successor.
DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION
The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of
September 1, 1985. The Bonds will be issuable only as fully
registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple
thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check
or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is
7/15/85
registered at
the close of business on the 15th
day (whether or
not a business
day) of the month preceding each
interest
payment date,
as shown by the register :maintained by the
Registrar. Principal
is payable upon surrender
of each Bond at
maturity or upon
prior redemption at the office
of the
Registrar.
MATURITIES
The Bonds
of each issue will mature on
January 1 in
the following
years and amounts:
Golf Course Tax Increment
Year
Bonds Bonds
Total
1988
$ 50,000
$ 50,000
1989
50,000 $ 150,000
200,000
1990
50,000 150,000
200,000
1991
50,000 150,000
200,000
1992
50,000 150,000
200,000
1993
100,000 200,000
300,000
1994
100,000 200,000
300,000
1995
100,000, 400,000
500,000
1996
100,000 900,000
1,000,000
1997
100,000 900,000
1,000,000
1998
150,000 900,000
1,050,000
1999
150,000 900,000
1,050,000
2000
150,000. 900,000
1,050,000
2001
11000,000
1,000,000
2002
11000,000
1,000,000
2003
11000,000
11000,000
2004
11000,000
11000,000
2005
1,050,000
1,050,000
2006
1,050,000
1,050,000
$1,200,000 $12,000,000
$13,200,000
REDEMPTION
Bonds of each issue maturing in 1997 and subsequent
years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment
at the
option of the
City in whole or in part, and if
in part, in
inverse order
of maturities and by lot within maturities, on
January 1,.1996, and any interest payment date
thereafter at a
price equal to the principal amount thereof to
be redeemed plus
accrued interest.to the date of redemption.
INTEREST
Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and
semi - annually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1. All
Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of
issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be
in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 1 /8th of 1 %, and no rate of
interest or the net effective rate of any issue of Bonds may
exceed the maximum rate to be determined in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 4.
DELIVERY
Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver
to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and
authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must
notify the Registrar, at least 5 business days before delivery.
of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be
initially registered and the authorized denominations of the
Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received
by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the
original purchaser and will be issued in denominations
corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the
day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the
opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage
certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in
any manner questioning the validity of the bonds is then
pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City,
threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City
at its designated depositary on the date of closing in
immediately available funds.
LEGAL OPINIONS
A legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be
provided by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The
legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be printed on the
appropriate Bonds at the request of the purchaser. The legal
opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general
obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their
terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by
State of Minnesota or United States laws relating to
bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights
generally.
TYPE OF BID AND AWARD
Sealed bids for not less than $12,945,000 and accrued
interest on the principal sum of $13,200,000 must be mailed or
delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the
time stated above. No bid may be altered or withdrawn by the
bidder after the time specified above for opening bids. Each
bid must be unconditional and accompanied by a cashier's or
certified check or bank draft in the amount of $264,000,
t 4'
7/15/85
payable to the City, to be retained as liquidated damages if
the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith.
The bid offering the lowest net interest cost (total interest
from date of Bonds to stated maturities, less any amount more
than $13,200,000 or plus any amount less than $13,200,000 bid
for principal) will be deemed most favorable. In the event
that two or more bids stated the lowest net cost, the sale of
the Bonds will be awarded by lot. No oral bid and no bid of
less than $12,945,000 for principal, plus accrued interest on
all Bonds will be considered. The City reserves the right to
reject any and all bids, to waive informalities in the bid, and
to adjourn the sale.
CUSIP NUMBERS
The City will assume no obligation for the assignment
or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the
correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit
such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the
purchaser, if the pruchaser waives any extension of the time of
delivery caused thereby.
Information for bidders and bidding forms may be
obtained from the undersigned.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
7. The City Treasurer - Finance Director, is hereby authorized and directed to
prepare on behalf.of the City an official statement to be distributed to potent-
ial purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement
of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 6 hereof and such other
information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe
the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Member Turner, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor
thereof:
Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the
Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk.
LIQUOR FUND REPORT as of May 31, 1985 was presented, reviewed and ordered placed
on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by.Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment
of the following claims dated 7/15/85: General Fund $86,405.25, Art Center
$6,881.82, Swimming Pool Fund $1,205.90, Golf Course Fund $74,754.97, Recreation
Center Fund $3,530.50, Utility Fund $14,511.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $89,437.88,
Construction Fund $296,965.60, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $7,265.99, Total $580,959.67.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:30 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 22, 1985
.4:00 P.M.
The Edina City Council held a closed meeting regarding potential litigation
on July 22, 1985, at 4:00 p.m.
Present were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, and Mayor Courtney.
Also present was Kenneth Rosland, City Manager; Gordon Hughes, Assistant City
Manager; Craig Larsen, Planner; Thomas Erickson, City Attorney; Marcella Daehn,
City Clerk; Ms..Becky Comstock and Mr. James Van Valkenburg.
Mr. Rosland explained that the meeting was called to consider the City's
position with regard to the proposed Homart Development project in Bloomington.
Member Richards asked to be excused because.of a possible conflict of interest
and left the meeting.
Mr. Hughes and Mr. Erickson explained that.Edina must submit written comments
on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by July 23, 1985, and
suggested various strategies whereby the City of.Bloomington may be willing to
compromise and reduce the intensity of the project. Following considerable
discussion, the Council Members informally agreed that the City-should respond
that.the EIS is.inadequate with regard to the Bloomington Comprehensive Plan
and the traffic studies for the proposed Homart project.
The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m. with no formal action being taken.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 22, 1985
5:00 P.M.
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION /PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; DECISION MADE TO
HIRE TWO ADDITIONAL PARAMEDICS. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of
July. 15, 1985 the Council had heard presentations regarding the Fire Department
organization and the paramedic program made by Robert Buresh, Public Safety
Director and William Feck, Fire Chief. Dr. Timothy Crimmins, medical director
for the paramedic program, also had-addressed the..Council and identified the
advantages of the City's fire -based paramedic program over EMS services from
outside providers and urged that two additional paramedics be added to the
program. The Council had informally agreed -to continue the matter to this
special.meeting to have time to assimilate the information presented before
taking action. Mr. Rosland reiterated his recommendation that the City hire
two additional paramedics to survive the fire -based paramedic program. He
indicated that there was one additional piece of information regarding Fair-
view- Southdale Hospital. They are in the process of changing to a new billing
system and when that is functional they will still be willing, even though the
City maintains its fire -based paramedics, to do the ambulance billing and
collect the monies for EMS services for the City. Mr. Rosland noted that a
memorandum has been prepared by Mr. Buresh listing the major issues that support
the hiring of two additional paramedics for the Fire Department. Speaking in
support of the recommendation and keeping the City's paramedic program were
Bob Solberg, Everett Erickson, Joe'_Berg, Doug:Erickson. and an unidentified
gentleman. In response to a question of Doug Erickson, Mr. Rosland clarified
that it is felt a 29. -man department will give the paramedic program stability,
and the recommendation is to add two additional paramedics in the next few
months.- He added that there are several retirements anticipated and the City
would hire paramedics for those replacements, who would also be trained as
firefighters. Member Bredesen asked Mr. Rosland if the paramedic program
could survive if more of the present firefighters trained to be paramedics
without adding the two additional paramedics. Mr. Rosland said.it_ could but
there does not seem -to be the interest among the firefighters to train as.
paramedics. Member Turner commented that we should establish a service level"
in the areas of fire suppression, paramedics and fire prevention and then take
a look at the alternative-::ways we can meet that service level. At the last
meeting, Dr. Crimmins came closest to analyzing alternatives in terms of
criteria, e.g. respon 'se time, quality of care, professional attitude, cost to
the consumer and cost.to the taxpayer.in general. She added that, based on
information to date, the Edina fire -based paramedic program comes out the
closest to meeting those goals of any of the alternatives mentioned. What is
missing is how Fairview - Southdale Hospital could meet those goals as they have
not submitted a definite proposal. Member Turner said that this would be her
approach.and that at this point she would .support the Manager's.recommendation.
Dr. Crimmins said that the key question is how - should the City provide the
EMS service. To make that decision...the.Edina paramedic service must be weighed
versus the other alternative services available. If the decision is to provide
it as a City fire -based program, then it must be given the support it needs;
e.g. staffing, funding and Council and citizen support. Member Kelly stated
that the Fire Department organizational plan as presented by the Public Safety
Director requires the addition of two paramedics, that she feels strongly that
the paramedic service should remain within the community, and made a motion
that the City Manager be directed to hire two additional paramedics. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner. Member Bredesen asked when the two paramedics
would be hired inasmuch as it is a non - budgeted item this year. Mr. Rosland
said the intent would be to hire them within the next 3 to 4 months and the
cost would have to be made up in the 1986 budget. Member Kelly commented that
the program is moving towards being self- supporting. Member Bredesen commented
that he felt everyone in the Fire Department should be trained to be paramedics,
that if the community wants to have a combination fire /paramedic service than
that is what we should have working for the City; also, that if the City hires
men as paramedics they should not be able to opt out of the service. He said
he felt that fire suppression should be a separate issue in the Fire Department's
organization. Member Richards commented that we do not have all the facts yet
and that he would like to look at all the options before changing the status quo.
He emphasized that no one has ever said that paramedic service will be dis-
continued, but that the Council has been looking at how to best deliver the
service to the citizens of Edina. He said he felt that the issue has been a
confrontation situation at all times and that he did not intend to support
adding two people that may or may not be needed; that he would support bring-
ing someone who could give an objective analysis of the options so that the
7/22/85
Council could determine what is best for the citizens of Edina. After further
discussion, Mayor Courtney called the motion.
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen, Richards
Motion carried.
.STRATEGIC PLAN /SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES FOR 1986 TO BE DISCUSSED ON 8/12/85.
Mr. Rosland advised that staff has been reviewing the Strategic Plan and the
key issues identified last year and it was felt that the Council should look
at those - issues in light of the outside influences on the City which have
recently been noted. Discussion followed as to when the Council should meet
-for. strategic planning and it was informally agreed to schedule a Special
Meeting for August 12, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. and that public notice should be
published.and posted.
Mayor Courtney then declared the meeting adjourned at 6:22 p.m.
City Clerk
t .
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
1985 AMENDMENTS TO THE
SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
fFP/- �
I. RECITALS
A. Recitals and Statement of Authority. The
Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council have previously
approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, which
established a tax increment financing district as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, and
have approved amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Plan, designated as the "1985 Amendments to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan' (the "1985 Amendments "), which
supplement and amend the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
to provide for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area,
as therein defined. This First Amendment to the 1985 Amendments
to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan is established
by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council
of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462,
and this First Amendment is approved by such bodies pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 and Sections 273.71 to
273.86.
II. ENLARGEMENT OF 1985 PROJECT AREA
The 1985 Project Area described in the 1985 Amendment
is hereby amended to include therein the following property
which is unimproved and located in the City:
Tract 5: Those parts of Lots 11, 12
and 13, Block 1, Meadowlane II Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly
and southwesterly of the centerline of
York Avenue South.
The above described property is presently owned by the City
of Edina and it is anticipated that such property will be
conveyed to the HRA.
III. AMENDMENT OF SECTION III B.2. OF THE 1985 AMENDMENT
Section III B.2. of the 1985 Amendment is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"2. Issuance of Bonds. The City
has previously issued its General Obligation
Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, dated
October 1, 1981, in the total principal
amount of $4,500,000 to finance the
acquisition of the 1985 Project Area.
It is presently expected that a portion
of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the
Project will be financed by the issuance
of additional Bonds in one or more series
in the principal amount of not greater
than $12,000,000. Certain costs of the
Interest Reduction Program will be undertaken
in connection with the 1985 Project are
not expected to be financed with the
proceeds of the Bonds and will be paid
directly from Tax Increment derived from
the District not needed to pay principal
and interest on Bonds. The additional
Bonds will be issued by the City or the
HRA under authority of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78."
IV. AMENDMENT OF SECTION III B.3. OF THE 1985 AMENDMENT
Section III B.3. of the 1985 Amendment is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"3. Bond Terms. The terms of the
additional Bonds are expected to be as
set forth below; however, the right is
reserved to adjust any and all terms
of the additional Bonds to secure the
best interest rate obtainable and to
insure that the entire principal of and
interest on the Bonds will be paid when
due from the sources specified in paragraph
4.
The additional Bonds will be in
the principal amount of not greater than
$12,000,000, will mature serially over
a period of approximately 20 years,
commencing on or after February 1, 1987,
will be subject to redemption prior to
maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates
of interest from date of issue to maturity,
payable semiannually commencing in 1986,
and will be sold at public sale."
CM
ffkA-T-
Commissioner
introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA "), as follows:
1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously
approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes
a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax.increment financing
plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district,
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision
9. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved
amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment
to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment ").
It has been proposed that the HRA approve additional amendments
to the Plan designated as the First Amendment to the 1985
Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the
"First Amendment ").
2. The First Amendment is described in the document
entitled "First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan" which has been presented to this
Board, and the First Amendment as so described is hereby
approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney
for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed
with the implementation of the 1985 Amendment as amended
by the First Amendment.
Attest:
Dated this 19th day of August, 1985.
Executive Director
Chairman
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was
duly seconded by Commissioner , and upon
vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested
by the Executive Director.
-2-
. j2 A- ffC
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
1985 AMENDMENT TO THE .SOUTHEAST EDINA
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
City: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting,
held on August 19, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City
Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SALE OF
LAND TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as
described above, have been carefully compared with the original
records of the City in my legal custody, from which they
have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct
and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the
City Council of the City, and is a correct and complete copy
of a resolution approved by the City Council at said meeting;
and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at
the time and place and was attended throughout by the members
indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting
given.as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this 19th day of August, 1985.
Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
Member
introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST
EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SALE OF
LAND TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have
previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment
project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq.,
and a tax increment financing plan, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, designated as the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan
established a tax increment financing district, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9 (the
"District "). This Council and the HRA have previously approved
amendments to the Plan designated as the 1985 Amendment to
the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "),
which include, .among other things, the establishment of an
interest reduction program under the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 11. The HRA has approved
additional amendments to the Plan designated as the First
Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan (the "First Amendment ") and has requested
that this Council approve the First Amendment. This Council
held a public hearing on the First Amendment on August 19,
1985, after notice of the public hearing was published in
The Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on August
8, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be heard on
the subject were given an opportunity with respect thereto.
2. Approval. The First Amendment is hereby approved.
3. Findings Under the Municipal Housing and
Redevelopment Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
462.521, it is hereby found that:
(A) The land located within the 1985 Project Area,
as defined in the First Amendment would not be made
available for redevelopment without financial aid sought;
(B) The redevelopment plans for the 1985 Project
Area as set forth in the 1985.Amendment as amended by
the First Amendment will afford maximum opportunity,
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole,
for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area by private
enterprise; and
j
(C) The 1985 Amendment as amended by the First
Amendment conforms to the general plan for the development
of the City as a whole.
4. Tract 5 as described in the First Amendment
is hereby authorized to be sold to the HRA for a price equal
to $5.94 per square foot, and the Mayor and City Manager
are hereby authorized to execute and deliver a quit claim
deed to said Tract 5, in exchange for the sale price, and
to execute and deliver such other documents, and to take
such other action, as may be necessary or desirable to consummate
such sale.
1985.
Attest:
Passed by the Council this 19th day of August,
C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Marcella Daehn, City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was
duly seconded by Member , and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by
the City Clerk.
:W=
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING
The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, August19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. at
the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Meeting to review
the design and construction schedule of Wooddale Park. This meeting
has been called as a result of concern for the improvement of Wooddale
Park. The park design is one of the original designs that were drawn for
the park by BRW & Associates. Construction on the park will start in the
fall of 1985. It is anticipated that the playground equipment and parking
lot will be constructed by the winter of 1985 -86:
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Park and Recreation
Department prior to the meeting or presented at the meeting itself. If
you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Thank you.
�I�YZ
Bob Kojetin, 'rector
Edina Park d Recreation Department
BK:mk
August 9, 1985
:frA-
EDINA PARK BOARD
August 12, 1985
7:30 p.m.
Edina City Hall
MEMBERS PRESENT: Joan Lonsbury, Robert Christianson, James Fee, Bill Lord,
Andrew Montgomery, Mack Thayer, George Warner, Don Wineberg
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Eddie MacHolda, John Valliere,
Larry Thayer, Madelyn Krinke
Chairperson Joan Lonsbury called the meeting to order.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 9, 1985 MEETING.
Don Wineberg moved to approve the minutes of the July 9, 1985 meeting.
Mack Thayer seconded the motion. Motion carried.
II. WOODDALE SCHOOL
Bob Kojetin presented and explained the proposed plan, Plan E from
BRW Architects, which is the plan the Park ,Board had recommended previously
to the Council. Mr. Kojetin explained that the usual procedure followed
in developing any city park is to hire someone to do a plan of how a
park may be constructed. The Park Board and staff must be concerned
with how the plan fits into the total park system. Then this plan is
submitted to the neighbors around the park for their input. Neighbor-
hood input is important and so far, Mr. Kojetin said that two meetings
have been held; one with a committee of neighbors and another with
neighbors contiguous to Wooddale Park. These meetings were held for the
purpose of obtaining input from the neighbors. Wooddale Park is some-
what different because of how it was acquired, and how it is to be
used and handled. Mr. Kojetin stated that at the directive of the
council,the Park Department and other city staff had gone back over a
lot of input which has been brought up over the last year. Bob Kojetin
pointed out that funding was set aside already for developing the park
so a lot of the work can be done right now. This is not the case with
other parks which usually must be completed in stages over a number of
years.
Bob Kojetin explained that Plan E as recommended, is a starting point
and that there were several options for specific plans using the Plan E
as a guideline. He indicated that the Park Board would not address the
issue of Utley Park since at an.earlier Park Board meeting it was
indicated that there is currently no funding or plans to do work there.
Bob stated the Park Board would need to discuss the number of parking
spaces they feel is necessary for a park, depending upon what type of
activities would take place in the park. The Park Department staff
recommends a large open space 140''x 300' which could be used by younger
children for such things as soccer, football, t -ball, but which would not
r -
2
be scheduled for league games. A t -ball field would only need a small
outfield, the main consideration being a large open space which could
be used for younger children activities. The most logical area to
develop for this purpose would seem to be where there is already
irrigation in the current open space previously used for t- ball /soccer.
T -ball and soccer could be scheduled at Wooddale if there were enough
youngsters who sign up to create teams if the space is there. Bob
Kojetin continued showing possible layouts of playground equipment areas,
including a large tiny tot and regular playground equipment area with
concrete curbing and sand in the middle. The tiny tot area could be
separate from the older children's playground area by benches; therefore,
be visible so that parents might be able to watch children playing in
both areas at the same time. Bob Kojetin stated that he felt it would
be necessary to provide some parking for people who drive to the park,
and the staff agreed that 25 spaces would be adequate to accommodate the
types of activities which he foresees being conducted there.
Mr. Kojetin reported that the council had received a petition with 175
signatures representing 144 dwellings, requesting some type of skating
rink in the park. He indicated that three rinks had been closed in
the last five years and others had been downgraded because of lack of
use by skaters. The trend in the last few years has been that hockey
players and figure skaters seldom use outdoor ice because it is so
unpredictable due to the weather. Mr. Kojetin stated that there is
presently a committee studying the feasibility of another covered rink.
Mr. Kojetin said the staff had discussed possibilities of a.rink at
Wooddale Park in response to the petition. One possibility would be
to flood a hard surface area which could be 100' x 100', so it could be
used for hard court activities such as volleyball, basketball in the
summer and an ice rink in the winter. Mr. Kojetin explained that it
would be easier to make ice on a hard surface than on the ground, but
that maintaining ice on an outdoor rink is very costly. He stated
that he would not recommend any other type of rink than one for young
children for recreational skating - no hockey boards or rink, nor would
he put a warming house there with a restroom and an attendant. He would
recommend some type of sun shelter for skate changing.
Regarding fencing, Mr. Kojetin recommended some type of fencing on the
south side, not parallel with the sidewalk, but create a larger
boulevard area. He noted.that the wall on the north side of the park
is crumbling and the fence would have to be replaced or repaired.
Lighting would be similar to what is currently in the Country Club area
along the east and south side of the park and the fence to Williams
Park would be dismantled.
Joan Lonsbury opened up the floor to discussion by the Park Board.
Don Winberg asked whether this was the same plan as the one discussed
in public meetings in the winter and if so why are there so many
objections being raised now that we're not in the beginning. Bob Kojetin
replied that it is the same plan with only a few modifications, including
enlarging the playground area and adding a hard surface area, specifying
25 parking stalls, and removal of the walking path on the north and west.
Mr. Kojetin said he has heard comments from residents about wanting a
walking path completed all the way around the park and from others that
do not want one.
3
Bob Christianson asked if the increased hard surface area is in
response to the petition for an ice skating rink. Bob Kojetin replied
yes. Bob Christianson asked how much the additional cost would be,
and where the closest skating rinks are now. Bob Kojetin indicated
that Arden and Weber are the closest. Bill Lord asked whether there
would be a rink at Utley Park if there was one built at Wooddale.
Mr. Kojetin replied that there would not be one at Utley, and he did
not know if there could be one in Utley Park at all. Bob Christianson
asked whether Mr. Kojetin knew how a hard surface would hold up if used
for an ice rink, and how many years it would be before having to redo
the surface. Mr. Kojetin wasn't sure how many years it would be,
however he felt it would certainly have to be done more frequently if
used for an ice rink, but the total cost factor would be offset by the
lower cost of maintaining ice on a hard surface. Mr. Kojetin said if
this concept were to be used, he would have to investigate it further.
Don Wineberg asked how much the rink would be used if there was no
warming house at the rink. Mr. Kojetin replied that we have about
six (6) days in a normal winter when the weather conditions are ideal
for skating and for ice making, which is 200 F by Weather Bureau
statistics.
Joan Lonsbury asked what the financial limitations are and how much
money is available. Mr. Kojetin reported that $125,000 was transferred
from the school to the city when the property was acquired, $100,000
from developers fund and $100,000 from the park capital budget which
must be spread over the next four years at the rate of $25,000 per
year. The amount used for the demolition, drawings and studies which
have been done is $171,000, leaving about $150,000 for the park
development this year and next year. Some rough estimates which
Mr. Kojetin gave for development were $30- 35,000 for playground equipment,
$35,000 for parking lot, $10-15,000 to rejuvenate the irrigation and
introduce to another area, $40- 50,000 to build a hard surface for both
winter and summer usage, $10- 15,000 for fencing and wall, and $15,000
for landscaping and trees.
Joan Lonsbury opened the floor to comments from the residents.
Mark Haymaker asked if the school has any right to take the site back
if it is needed for a school in the future. Bob Christianson stated
that the terms of transfer were that if the school deems that it needs
the site for school purposes, it has the right to claim the site, and
to the extent of the capital improvements to the facility, would have
to repay the city. Mr. Haymaker expressed several other concerns 1) the
concrete wall on the north side is crumbling and he would suggest a
grass burm when it is redone, 2) if a tunnel was built under the
bridge, he is concerned about security, how it would be policed at night,
if it would be lit, how secure it would be, 3) parking lot issue - since
private industry was not allowed to buy and use the site, he feels it
is inappropriate that a church should have any influence on building a
parking lot for their use, that if St. Stephens has a problem with
parking, they should resolve the problem without using city property
as a solution. After several comments from residents about wanting
to discuss the parking lot issue, Bob Kojetin restated the City
Council's directive to the Park Board to address the park as they see
it, as a park only.
0
Mike Lewis expressed a concern about the access to the park being
from Wooddale Avenue. Dave Duhaime requested that the Park Board
give a strong opinion that 25 parking spaces is enough and is what
the community wants. Pat Nelson stated that she felt that the parking
lot is only being included to accommodate St. Stephens Church because
the parking area which was at Wooddale School was only used by the
church, and access from Wooddale Avenue would be very dangerous.
Don Wineberg stated that experts were hired to study the best access
to the park and the recommendation from them was to enter from Wooddale.
Pam Griffin stated she felt there were very few cars using the parking
lot at the park unless there was something going on at the church.
She would like to see the park preserved as a natural setting and
leave apparatus for the older children. George Psihos (4607 Wooddale)
stated that he feels it is extremely important to make the park one
for toddlers because there is nothing in that area for small
children. He feels it is wrong to make a parking lot in the park
because it would be taking away an opportunity to provide a park for
children and would be catering to adults. Mr. Magnuson agreed there
should be no parking lot and should be no walking path on the west
side of the park. Charles Philipp agreed we should not provide a
large number of parking spaces to be used by the church. Wendy Powell
asked that they consider an overpass into Utley Park rather than an
underpass because it is cleaner and safer for people to use.
Joe Price wants to see the north fence left and burm put in. He also
feels that the ratio of users on a skating rink at Wooddale would not
justify the cost.
Janie Paulus indicated that the residents near the Wooddale School
were mostly under the impression that the school would be razed and
then final plans would be made for development of the park and they
were not aware that it would be done immediately after the demolition
which is why they had not been expressing their concerns about park
development previously. She feels that the park should be designed
with the very young children as the primary influence because of the
large numbers of K - 3rd graders in the area of the park, and that
there should not be any parking lot.
Marilyn Hoch stated that she had taught in Stillwater where they
used a hard surface area and flooded for a skating rink in the winter
and the surface was cracked and not useable for a play area most of the
time because of the poor condition of the surface.
Mike Lewis stated that he feels parking space in the park would be
selling off park land for church parking.
Jim Lofquist stated that traffic is going to create a serious hazard
if there are two entrances to the park because he feels it will
be used as a race way. Bob Kojetin referred Mr. Lofquist to the
Traffice Safety Committee regarding a stop sign at the corner of
Browndale and Country Club and one at Country Club and Wooddale.
Kathy Stassen asked how the Park Board could give a recommendation
to the council if they did not look at the Utley Park together with
the Wooddale Park in regard to parking and the total park system.
Bob Kojetin replied that there are no plans now to develop Utley Park
and to leave it as it is, therefore it was not a consideration. There
5
was confusion about the number of parking spaces at Utley and
proposed spaces by several of the residents. Bob Kojetin clarified
that there is presently a total of 39 parking spaces. George
Daravingas (4507 Drexel) stated that the people came to the Park Board
meeting to discuss the recommendation the Board will give to the council,
and that must include discussion about the parking lot. He asked that
no parking lot be put in the park. Sally Kennedy repeated the need for
a tot playground in the park, and that 42 parking spaces are too many.
ANDY MONTGOMERY MADE A MOTION THAT PLAN E AS PRESENTED BE ACCEPTED
WITH THE ENLARGED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND THAT THERE BE NO MORE
THAN TWENTY -FIVE (25) PARKING SPACES. Motion seconced by Jim Fee.
Discussion - Bob Christianson questioned the directive from the
Council regarding the parking and access. Bob Kojetin stated that he
understood that the parking issue would be decided by the council,
but the Park Board should make a recommendation on what is needed
based on the usage of the park, and that the park staff recommends
25 parking spaces for park usage. Mr. Kojetin further stated that
it could be possible to change the recommendation of Plan E regarding
access from Wooddale to access from 50th Street.
Bob Christianson asked if a wading pool was included in this recommendation.
Bob Kojetin replied that it was not. After further discussion regarding
access, Bob Kojetin stated that BRW had chosen Wooddale Avenue as the
access based on the volume of traffic on both 50th and Wooddale streets.
George Warner commented that he feels that whenever a neighborhood
park is developed, it is done for the use by all the people in Edina,
not just that particular neighborhood and for that reason, there should
be some type of parking provided in the park.
Bill Lord said that because of limits of finances, he would like to see
a priority list of what to do first in the park. Bob Kojetin stated
that he would like to have a priority list made from input from the
residents, and that the playground issue is probably the first priority
to do; followed by grass and irrigation. Bob Christianson asked if the
staff recommended the number of 25 parking spaces. Bob Kojetin and
John Keprios responded yes, it was. John Keprios elaborated on the
question - the park department recognizes that there was no parking
area created at Arden Park and Todd Park and realize that it was a
mistake not to do so and their recommendation for parking at Wooddale
is based on past experience as well as on activities they foresee
in the park.
MOTION.PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.
III. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - Club House Expansion
Bob Kojetin presented the drawings of the planned expansion of the club house.
Bob explained that bids would be going out in one week. The club house
expansion will include a 200 seating capacity room on the south side, expansion
of the Pro Shop, new office for managers and golf pro, new hallway on east side
of building, new main enterance (into present building) and new expanded room.
There will be a link between club house and pro shop so people do not have to
walk outside.
M
On lower level a small expansion of the locker rooms. There would be .3 rooms;
one for a men's lounge, one a ladies lounge, and a combination room for
men and ladies. This room could be used for a conference room or to
hold tournament special events. The ladies locker room would be changed
to a new location and the old locker room would be incorporated to a
golf cart storage area, under the expanded Pro shop /office; which
would include a toilet and consession area.
Bob Kojetin explained that the plans had been reviewed a number of
times by people on the Golf Committee and staff and feels now that
present plans and traffic patterns are satisfactory. Don Wineberg
also commented on the number of people and reviews of different
combinations of traffic patterns in the locker room facilities of the
men and women. He indicated that the Golf Committee will meet again
on Thursday, August 22 to see final plans. Don Wineberg moved to
accept the plans as presented for the expansion of the club house.
George Warner seconded and was passed unanimously.
IV. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - Par 3 Expansion
Bob Kojetin described the plans for the expansion of the par 3 course.
The plans are the same as was ready for bid last winter. However, they
now include State Aid for Braemar Boulevard by State Aid Project. This
will allow Braemar Boulevard to be reconstructed to #2 tee. With State
Aid, the par 3 course has a better finance package. Included in State
Aid Road Project package are many storm water control and ponding areas,
which are necessary for water movement in the area. These requirements
would previously had to have been included in the construction of the
par 3 course. The State has not approved the cost of a bridge as of
yet, but hopefully they will. The new bridge across Braemar Boulevard
would be 110' long and 10' wide. The cost of the bridge would be around
$30,000 of which the State may pay 50% to 100 %. Other new improvements
to Braemar Boulevard would include a curb and sidewalk on the south
side of Braemar Boulevard. This sidewalk would be a continuation of
the sidewalk on the South side of Dewey Hill Road. At the end of the
sidewalk of the road improvement we could mark a large white line on
the.road which would continue all the way around to the Golf Course
Maintenance Building and connect to the present path.
The fill from tees one and ten will be taken and placed onto Braemar
Boulevard (approximately 6' high) for six months to compact the fill
before use. Bob Kojetin added that the improvements to-the par 3 course
will add a lot.to,Braemar Golf Course both financially and aesthetically.
Bob Christiansen moved to accept the Par 3 Expansion plans as drawn. Don
Wineberg seconded and was passed unanimously.
V. FEES AND CHARGES
Bob Kojetin presented the fees and charges for 1986. Bob explained
that a one dollar increase on most programs is necessary to keep up
with inflation. Bob also-explained that the Art Center fees and charges
have not been established. Bob Christiansen moved to accept the fees
and charges structure as presented . Bill Lord seconded and was passed
unanimously.
Meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m.
Residents in attendance at Park Board Meeting August 18, 1985.
Robert L. Meller
Barbara Curry
Steve & Sally Kenady
Jane & Charles Paulus
Jim Lofquist
Pat Nelson
Jane Fuegner
Joe Price
Terry O'Rourke
Mike & Gail Lewis
Wendy Powell
George Psihos
Diana Psihos
Mary & Kim Haymaker
Charles & Patricia Philipp
Kathy Stassen
Pat McMunn
Joan Cornwell
Janie Bennett (Mrs. G.F.)
L. Magnuson
Yngve Magnuson
Jean Johnston
George Johnston
Marilyn Hoch
Barbara Andrews
George Daravingas
Susan & David Duhaime
Corky Weber
Leonard Addington
Kathryn Hagen
Tom Anderson
Griffity
Hugh & Marilyn Jones
Irene Joseph
4614 Moorland Ave.
4817 Upper Terrace
4605 Wooddale Ave.
4617 Moorland
4408 Country Club
4625 Drexel
5225 Kellogg
4407 Country Club
4600 Drexel
4601 Drexel
4612 Moorland
4607 Wooddale
4607 Wooddale
4605 Edina Blvd.
5 Eden Court
4406 Sunnyside
4503 Edina Blvd.
4905 Browndale
4901 Browndale
4909 Browndale
4909 Browndale
4516 Casco
4516 Casco
4510 Drexel
4512 Drexel
4507 Drexel
4401 Country Club
4303 Country Club
• 4
Rd.
4305 Country Club Rd.
4603 Drexel Ave.
4603 Drexel Ave.
*7 Edina Ct.
4905 Arden
4604 Moorland Ave.
Corky K. Weber
4303 Country Club Road
Edina, MN 55424
August 12, 1985
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Courtney:
I would like to take this opportunity to express my concern and the
concern of the community regarding the Wooddale School and park situation.
The concern in the neighborhood is the lack of green space for the new
Wooddale park. With the planning of 42 parking spaces, as Mr. Ken Rosland
stated at the last city council meeting, we feel that there will be limited
green space to make the park compatible with the neighborhood. With the
parking that is already planned at Utley Park, we cannot understand the
need for 88 parking spaces at 'a neighborhood park. We also feel that adding
the parking and an entrance from Wooddale, we would be creating even more
traffic in our residential area. My alternative is to place the parking
lot on the Southwest corner of 50th and Woodale where the additional traffic
would not affect a residential area or an area where children play.
The city also owns a full city lot on Wooddale and 50th on the Northeast
corner. This is wasted space which could be converted to a parking lot for
the needs of the church.
It seems the major question is, are we building a play area for our children
or are we building a parking lot in a residential neighborhood? I feel the
concerns of the Edina residents should be considered before that of the city
manager who wants a parking lot in a park where it does not belong.
Sincerely,
Corky Weber
CKW /bw
cc: Ken Rosland
City Manager
X774-
IV
4 61
Ll� A
0 cc- C
Pc4-c- 10
s
sE,�.�,s
G`
pc,�,
S
s
ck-
pc>�t
l
�01-
v
0, . 4 0
C4\
�C,�.�rik� �v
(D c
J�A-
4610 Edina Blvd.
Edina, Mn. 55424
a
City of Edina
Edina, Mn. 55424
Mayor C.,Wayne.Courtney
Dear Sir:
We favor the 25 parking spaces recommended to meet
the needs of Wooddale Park,so that the maximum usage of
land be for park activities.
The city of Edina must expend tax revenues for the
development of an Edina park area directed �to meet the
needs of the residents. At no !t ime should any religious
organization be allowed to make contributions to the
city in teturn for any preferential treatment(addtional
parking spaces)not withstanding any previous precedence.
As stated in our U.S.Constitution, the separation
of church and state must be rigorously adhered to and
jelously guarded. our city council may compromise many
issues but never compromise principle.
Sinderely your,
1
John and P/at Dill
Edina residents for 25 years
Fo Members of the Park Board, City Council, the Mayor and City Manager:
As adjacent property o,,mArs at the Wooddale Park site we wish to make the
-Following statements of consensus:
1. we consider a reasonable number of parking spaces a necessity and feel
that number should not exceed 25 on the Wooddale site
2. we are opposed to any type of hockey rinki.e., boards built, high lights
for evening skating
3. we favor priority use of the park for youngsters that are pre- school
and lower elementary grades - -with emphasis on equipment that would
encourage same
4. we are in favor of landscaping that enhances an open, flat area,shields
the alley side of the park and disguises a fence along 50th that we
think is needed in this city park due to heavy street traffic
5. we are in favor of a walkway on the perimeter of the park that would
offer a groomed trail both winter and summer for walkers and runners
however, we are not in favor of developing lots of seclusion and hidden
areas along the walkway (i.e. Bredesen Park style)
Thank you for your consideration and we appreciate your efforts to keep us
informed and your willingness to consider our points of view.
MI
IRMI.F010
PIT
� u �
M WA =4 AS
I IWAIM11
I 1 ,
,r VI
/ / / FIR
•
4502 Browndale Ave.
Edina, Minnesota
August 17, 1985
Members of The Council,
City of Edina
Minnesota
Ladies and Gentlemen of The Council:
Having lived in the Country Club neighborhood for 17 years and our
three children having grown up in the Wooddale environs, we offer the
following comments on the proposed park development:
. We like the idea of having the 50th St. sidewalk going through
the park. Edina needs some "built -in" nice public spaces. We cant
always confine public space to concrete and asphalt. If some parents
worry about strangers coming into the park then those children may
be too young for unsupervised play. There really is not very much
foot traffic on 50th Street.
. LIGHTING Please include lighting for walkers, preferrably at
a lower level of intensity. Light standards as used in Country Club
would be consistent. Likewise, please do not use the orange, sodium
vapor lighting. We hope that there will be no lighting for night games.
. A "planted" fence of greenery would seem to be more attractive
than the usual chain link or wood fence.
. Parking Spaces: fewer
Some have expressed interest in ice hockey facilities. I have
observed that hockey tends to dominate a skating facility and is per -
cieved as intimidating and overpowering to most other casual skaters.
Flooding a playing field leads, sooner or later, to demands for .night
lighting which, I , feel, is undesirable for a small neighborhood park
adjacent private homes. Basically, we hope that this park will not
be scheduled for Park Board games and that no bleecher seats will
ever be installed alongside playing fields.
Hopefully, this park will be for adults
few amenities like a walking path through
gardens would be very nice, aesthetically.
make it a special place.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Robert J. De brey and mily
as well as children. A
trees, shrubs, and flower
A sculpture or two would
4409 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
JT-
To Council members and Mayor Courtney:
Concerning the Wooddale Park:
I just want to remind each of you that early this year a
petition was presented to the council that contained the
names of approxiamtely 500 residents of the Country club
neighborhood. In that statement these neighborhood
people asked that the building be razed and the space
generated by the removal of the building be used for a
neighborhood park.
It was also a consensus of those 500 people that the green
area be expanded to a maximum and the hard surfaces in the
park be kept to a minimum. Therefore, it seems to follow that
these people would surely endore less rather than more
parking surface at the Wooddale Park.
As a personal. statement I wish to say that I am very, very
much opposed to the c0- mixing of funds from the church and
city government. If the previous precedent has not been
.challenged legally, I'm not sure that it follows that a
precedent has indeed been set.
I trust that you will give due consideration to 500 signatures.
Sincerely,
Mary Kluesner
4409 Country Club Road
- f � (� � � � , � q-,r �c.i_� C� IYYI�tii.t..'VVI,�.�..'YVl
t lam` c�CA "Sk GvL lK-�ti- n &
t a S w�luh a � a d��-�� � a o
-�Cc.)k -box. a5
Loo d rk . LLj Q CA,
ri)CLQ-
O4:X a CA cJ
a
U LLdLL cto 0m M k'
C o�tit �l,b iAS 1.0 't"�- U` cQ•(tG�'�"� � �' O uJY1c� �� -Qsi. � !�
-�-�U c��,,�L yes �s�tiv►1 C) wru-kb
5
Val cuu-'r
kwm LL
0A KLQ-ij
"LiLLA �
'(�iY1 C �tn�c� �- � �-�'L e �tvwvwc.� +�'v►n �,t,�enax �-
� �•ose. 4-�- AAAri.,ut..
ati�\ bam, mod` -.`-" 7L
Svc :.- '�
r'Y1
W cLA
U1aC ez -kdA�L tf1'!
b ° C-v t a7 ul .alllLGL't :;1 )GY R t -lam t 4 ,o
&(J L n. tR �-Cll do
CJ
(Nw U
c
C3-,- s�
•Y" azj
Co vin Nen i.v
t
1
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: August 16, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: Agenda item III. A. 1. Grandview Development Co.
PRD -4 to PSR -4
Attached are the minutes from the Planning Commission July-31, 1985
meeting concerning the subject proposed, Our staff report and all
other information submitted by the proponent are included in the
notebook prepared by the developer. Please refer to section 10 for
our staff report.
+ Page 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 1985 AT 7:30 P. M.
MEMBERS PRESENT: John Bailey, Helen McClelland, David
Runyan, W. W. Lewis, John Skagerberg,
John Palmer, and Del Johnson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Johnson, Virginia Shaw and
Phil Sked
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES;
Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes for
the meeting of June 26, 1985. Mr. David Runyan Seconded the
motion. All were in favor; the motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Craftsman
Builders preliminary plat approval -of Interlachen Heights
would be continued to the next Commission meeting of August
28, 1985.
III. NEW BUSINESS;
Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Corporation
Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to
Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4
Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south
of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel)
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject
property is a 3.5 acre site which is occupied by the closed
Biltmore Motel. The Commission and Council approved a
Planned Residential District (PRD -4) rezoning on the
property in the fall of 1984 for the construction of an 88
unit, 4 story condominium project. A new development team
has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning
request for the purpose of constructing a seniors citizen
rental apartment. The developers are requesting a rezoning
to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the
construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5 and 6
story sections. The building would contain 70 one bedroom
Page 2
units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms units.
Exterior materials would be brick.
Mr. Larsen added that the Zoning Ordinance requires a
minimum of 2,500 square of lot area per unit in PSR -4 with
the possibility of reducing this requirement to 1000 square
feet per unit through a series of allowances. The proposed
plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through
credits for underground parking, type I or II construction,
accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen
units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to
Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district.
Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance
establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and
for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment
building. Using graphics Mr. Larsen presented Ordinance
requirements as they compare with the subject proposal:
Unit Sizes
Zoning
Ordinance
Subject Proposal
1 Bedroom
550 -650
S. F.
70 at 660
S.
F.
700 for
handicapped
2 Bedroom
750 -850
S. F.
33 at 795
S.
F.
41 at 900
S.
F.
3 Bedroom
N.A.
8 @ 1,070
S.
F.
Community
152 units
X 15
7,950 S.
F.
Spaces
S. F. or
2,280 S.F.
Mr. Larsen stated that a variance to Ordinance unit
size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedrooms units
would be necessary.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the Ordinance
requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25 space per
unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking for a
seniors residence. For a 152 unit building this results in
38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject
proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces and 51 surface spaces.
the proponents have submitted an alternate plan illustrating
76 surface spaces and have suggested a proof of parking
agreement which would add the additional spaces if needed.
Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite the
major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic
Study for Link Road. No access to either west 52nd or 53rd
streets is anticipated by the plan.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that in the Planned Residential
District when building height exceeds 35 feet the setback
required is equal to the height of the building. The
Page 3
proposed building contains sections which are 36, 45, and 54
in height. Set backs corresponding to these heights have
been provided. The design of the building provides for
greater than minimum setbacks for much of the building. The
PSR -4 district allows a maximum building coverage of 35 %.
The proposed building would cover 21% which compares to 27%
building coverage for the most recently approved condominium
project on the site.
Mr., Larsen commented that this concept is referred to
as market rate elderly housing and is designed for a
population of seniors who would not meet the income limits
for other senior housing, and who desire a level of services
not provided by more traditional housing alternatives. The
proponents have commissioned a market study to determine the
demand for this type of housing in Edina.
Mr. Larsen added that there are several land use issues
that need to be addressed concerning this proposal.
The first issue is height.
Mr. Larsen explained that the building contains 4, 5,
and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45, and
54 feet. This compares to 4 stories and a uniform height of
40 feet for the 88 unit building approved for the site. The
architect has chosen to provide a building which is broken
down into three main units of varied height to reduce the
monotony and to add visual interest to the building. We
believe they have succeeded and have created a more
appealing building than the previous plan. Properties most
impacted by the building's height are to the west along
Grandview Lane. Set backs along this line vary from 40 to
90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier plan.
The increased height allows a reduction in building coverage
which results in increased landscaped areas. The proponents
contend that the building height results, at least
partially, from the need to have a compact building foot
print, allowing shorter corridors and a more efficient
delivery of services.
Mr. Larsen addressed the Zoning issue stating that
the City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to
HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. These projects
are required to rent only to seniors for the full 40 year
term of their mortgage. The buildings contain primarily one
bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms units, and
because of income limits for tenants automobile ownership is
limited. Since this project would not be controlled by HUD
it would be necessary for the City /HRA to limit occupancy.
Staff believes this could be accomplished through a
redevelopment contract and deed restrictions.
Page 4
Mr. Larsen further added that the Zoning Ordinance
responded to senior citizens housing by taking the unit
sizes that the Federal Government stipulated and
incorporating them into the ordinance. This was intended
to eliminate the need for variances. The developers
contend that their experience indicates a need to offer
slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD
projects would allow. The one bedroom, one bedroom plus den
units (considered here as a two bedroom), and 2 bedroom
units are within or very near our Ordinance requirements.
The three bedrooms units would not be allowed. The
proponents claim that the target market demands larger units
with more bedroom options. Staff supports a variance to
allow the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City
can exercise control over building occupancy.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that staffs major concern is
parking and traffic. The Ordinance requires .75 parking
space per unit. .25 of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4
District. The subject proposal would provide .84 space per
unit .5 of which would be enclosed. the most comparable
existing project in the City would seem to be 7500 York.
Parking provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the
subject proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of
which is enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will
provide a total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per
unit enclosed. Staff conversations with management at 7500
York indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting
list for enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase
in the amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking
agreement for surface parking. The proponents have hired
BRW, Inc. to examine the traffic impact of the development.
Staff would suggest that the entry from Vernon be redesigned
at a right angle to Vernon.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed location is
shown in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for elderly
housing, and in staffs' opinion represents an excellent
reuse of this property. Mr. Larsen further stated that staff
recommends approval of the preliminary development plan with
an increase in enclosed parkin to .7 per unit, the granting
of the unit size variances, surface parking variances and
proof of parking agreement. Mr. Larsen informed the
Commission that Mr. Dunbar held a public meeting on July 29,
1985 regarding this project.
At this time Mr. Dunbar was invited to make a presentation
of his development plan.
Mr. Dunbar began his presentation by explaining to the
Commission that.the proposed development project is market
driven. Mr. Dunbar further added that the Grandview
Page 5
Development Team felt there should be no outside influence
describing to them what the market should be; therefore,
Grandview Development has opted not to take any federal
regulations on this project. This would allow the project
to be designed strictly to appeal to the market place.
Mr. Dunbar proceeded to introduce to the Commission
members of the Grandview Development Team. Mr. Wayne Winsor
of Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., Ms. Patricia A.
McCullough of Health Planning and Management Resources,
Inc., and Mr. Peter Van Hauer of Health Central Enterprises.
Mr. Winsor, Ms. McCullough and Mr. Van Hauer gave a brief
presentation of their expertise in relationship to the
proposed development project. Commission members directed
questions to the Grandview Development Team.
William Lewis inquired as to whether there are any
facilities like the proposed facility in the metro area.
Mr. Van Hauer replied that at the present time there are no
facilities exactly like the proposed facility. The
difference is that the proposed facility is rental. Other
facilities offer similar services but are condominiums or
cooperative projects.
Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Van Hauer if Health Central had
experience in the management of facilities similar to the
proposed facility. Mr. Van Hauer told the Commission that
Health Central manages 1 project on Lake Shore Drive, 3 HUD
projects, and will manage 2 other facilities when they are
completed. Mr. Runyan questioned Mr. Van Hauer on the
definition of "On Call Nursing ". Mr. Van Hauer explained
that all units would be equipped with pull cords, most
likely placed in the bathroom and master bedroom. If the
need would arise for quick medical attention the tenant
could alert staff. The staff would be trained for emergency
situations; administering CPR etc. Mr. Van Hauer further
added that the trained staff are not meant to be a
substitute for Police, Fire or other trained emergency
personnel.
Helen McClelland and David Runyan inquired about rental
rates for the project. Mr. Dunbar informed the Commission
that a set rate has not been decided on. Mr. Dunbar added
that he realizes they have to be market competitive and he
is waiting for results of a survey that addresses the rent
issue. Mr. Dunbar commented that after a preliminary
analysis he felt the rates would most likely be in the
price range of $800.00 on up. A brief discussion ensued on
if meals would be included in the rental price of the unit.
Ms. MCcullough stated that they are looking for a minimum of
one meal a day but they have not yet defined how to
implement the cost. Ms. McCullough said she is waiting for
the market research questionnaire to come back. Ms.
Page 6
McCullough added that she felt for the first few years the
meals would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that that
would mean that each renter would have a small monthly fee
of $10.00 - $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additional meal
fee. Ms. Mccullough added that the figure would probably be
closer to $30.00.
Helen McClelland questioned whether or not the units
would be handicap accessible. Ms. McCullough stated that
units would be handicap accessible. Helen McClelland asked
if the age of 75+ was a firm requirement for rental and what
would happen if someone became ill and needed to be
hospitalized for a period of time. Ms. McCullough explained
that the 75+ is an average age quote. Rental can began at
age 55 +. In regard to the health issue The Grandview Team
hopes to develop a occupancy criteria that would address
that issue.
David Runyan asked Fran Hoffman if traffic signals
would be constructed at the site. Mr. Hoffman stated that
the City had targeted this area to be signalized and have
sidewalks put in.
Mr. Dunbar recapped his meeting with the neighborhood
by informing the Commission that most residents were
comfortable with the proposed development and expressed
their belief that the Grandview Team was competent. They
also expressed there dissatisfaction with the present site
and were satisfied that the proposed development would add
to the community.
John Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re-
zoning. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
-7 Gustafson and Assoc.
Approval Indian Hill
Lots 1 -15, Block
of 11, Block 1 e
Generally Located: h Crosst
of on Road
Pre ,J&Orinary Plat
Addition
ndian Hills 2nd.
Timbers
own Highway and West
Mr. Larsen in d the Commission t the City
Council granted fi plat approval to India 'lls 2nd
Addition in Apr' 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots
along McCaule rail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de sac
extending h from McCauley Trail. Since that time the
s
r ?
N t
r MX-1-r-
t s` i
N U M B E R Z -85 -3 Dunbar Development Corp.
L O C A T 10 N 5212 Vernon Avenue; Lots 1, 2, 3, E 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau
Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of W. 52nd Street.
REQUEST PSR -4, Plan Amendment
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 1985 AT 7:30 P. M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:. John Bailey, Helen McClelland, David
Runyan, W. W. Lewis, John Skagerberg,
John Palmer, and Del Johnson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Johnson, Virginia Shaw and
Phil Sked
STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES;
Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes for
the meeting of June 26, 1985. Mr. David Runyan Seconded the
motion. All were in favor; the motion carried.
II. OLD BUSINESS:
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Craftsman
Builders preliminary plat approval of Interlachen Heights
would be continued to the next Commission meeting of August
28, 1985.
III. NEW BUSINESS;
Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Corporation
Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to
Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4
Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south
of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel)
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject
property is a 3.5 acre site which is occupied by the closed
Biltmore Motel. The Commission and Council approved a
Planned Residential District (PRD -4) rezoning on the
property in the fall of 1984 for the construction of an 88
unit, 4 story condominium project. A new development team
has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning
request for the purpose of constructing a seniors citizen
rental apartment. The developers are requesting a rezoning
to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the
construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5 and 6
story sections. The building would contain 70 one bedroom
Page 2
units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms units.
Exterior materials would be brick.
Mr. Larsen added that the Zoning Ordinance requires a'
minimum of 2,500 square of lot area per unit in PSR -4 with
the possibility of reducing this requirement to 1000 square
feet per unit through a series of allowances. The proposed
plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through
credits for underground parking, type I or II construction,
accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen
units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to
Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district.
Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance
establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and
for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment
building. Using graphics Mr. Larsen presented Ordinance
requirements as they compare with the subject proposal:
Unit Sizes Zoning Ordinance Subject Proposal
1 Bedroom 550 -650 S. F. 70 at 660 S. F.
700 for handicapped
2 Bedroom 750 -850 S. F. 33 at 795 S. F.
41 at 900 S. F.
3 Bedroom N.A. 8 @ 1,070 S. F.
Community 152 units X 15 7,950 S. F.
Spaces S. F. or 2,280 S.F.
Mr. Larsen stated that a variance to Ordinance unit
size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedrooms units
would be necessary.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the Ordinance
requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25 space per
unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking for a
seniors residence. For a 152 unit building this results in
38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject
proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces -and 51 surface spaces.
the proponents have submitted an alternate plan illustrating
76 surface spaces and have suggested a proof of parking
agreement which would add the additional spaces if needed.
Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite the
major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic
Study for Link Road. No access to either west 52nd or 53rd
streets is anticipated by the plan.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that in the Planned Residential
District when building height exceeds 35 feet the setback
required is equal to the height of the building. The
Page 3
proposed building contains sections which are 36, 45, and 54
in height. Set backs corresponding to these heights have
been provided. The design of the building provides for
greater than minimum setbacks for much of the building. The
PSR -4 district allows a maximum building coverage of 350.
The proposed building would cover 21% which compares to 27%
building coverage for the most recently approved condominium
project on the site.
Mr. Larsen commented that this concept is referred to
as market rate elderly housing and is designed for a
population of seniors who would not meet the income limits
for other senior housing, and who desire a level of services
not provided by more traditional housing alternatives. The
proponents have commissioned a market study to determine the
demand for this type of housing in Edina.
Mr. Larsen added that there are several land use issues
that need to be addressed concerning this proposal.
The first issue is height.
Mr. Larsen explained that the building contains 4, 5,
and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45, and
54 feet. This compares to 4 stories and a uniform height of
40 feet for the 88 unit building approved for the site. The
architect has chosen to provide a building.which is broken
down into three main units of varied height to reduce the
monotony and to add visual interest to the building. We
believe they have succeeded and have created a more
appealing building than the previous plan. Properties most
impacted by the building's height are to the west along
Grandview Lane. Set backs along this line vary from 40 to
90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier plan.
The increased height allows a reduction in building coverage
which results in increased landscaped areas. The proponents
contend that the building height results, at least
partially, from the need to have a compact building foot
print, allowing shorter corridors and a more efficient
delivery of services.
Mr. Larsen addressed the Zoning issue stating that
the City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to
HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. These projects
are required to.rent only to seniors for the full 40 year
term of their mortgage. The buildings contain primarily one
bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms units, and
because of income limits for tenants automobile ownership is
limited. Since this project would not be controlled by HUD
it would be necessary for the City /HRA to limit occupancy.
Staff believes this could be accomplished through a
redevelopment contract and deed restrictions.
Page 4
Mr. Larsen further added that the Zoning Ordinance
responded to senior citizens housing by taking the unit
sizes that the Federal Government stipulated and
incorporating them into the ordinance. This was intended
to eliminate the need for variances. The developers
contend that their experience indicates a need to offer
slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD
projects would allow. The one bedroom, one bedroom plus den
units (considered here as a two bedroom), and 2 bedroom
units are within or very near our Ordinance requirements.
The three .bedrooms units would not be allowed. The
proponents claim that the target market demands larger units
with more bedroom options. Staff supports a variance to
allow the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City
can exercise control over building occupancy.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that staffs major concern is
parking and traffic. The Ordinance requires .75 parking
space per unit. .25 of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4
District. The subject proposal would provide .84 space per
unit .5 of which would be enclosed. the most comparable
existing project in the City would seem to be 7500 York.
Parking provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the
subject proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of
which is enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will
provide a total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per
unit enclosed. Staff conversations with management at 7500
York indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting
list for enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase
in the amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking
agreement for surface parking. The proponents have hired
BRW, Inc. to examine the traffic impact of the development.
Staff would suggest that the entry from Vernon be redesigned
at a right angle to Vernon.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed location is
shown in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for elderly
housing, and in staffs' opinion represents an excellent
reuse of this property. Mr. Larsen further stated that staff
recommends approval.of the preliminary development plan with
an increase in enclosed parkin to .7 per unit, the granting
of the unit size variances, surface parking variances and
proof of parking agreement. Mr. Larsen informed the
Commission that Mr. Dunbar held a public. meeting on July 29,
1985 regarding this project.
At this time Mr. Dunbar was invited to make a presentation
of his development plan.
Mr. Dunbar began his presentation by explaining to the
Commission that the proposed development project is market
driven. Mr. Dunbar further added that the Grandview
Page 5
Development Team felt there should be no outside influence
describing to them what the market should be; therefore,
Grandview Development has opted not to take any federal
regulations on this project. This would allow the project
to be designed strictly to appeal to the market place.
Mr. Dunbar proceeded to introduce to the Commission
members of the Grandview Development Team. Mr. Wayne Winsor
of Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., Ms. Patricia A.
McCullough of Health Planning and Management Resources,
Inc., and Mr. Peter Van Hauer of Health Central Enterprises.
Mr. Winsor, Ms. McCullough and Mr. Van Hauer gave a brief
presentation of their expertise in relationship to the
proposed development project. Commission members directed
questions to the Grandview Development Team.
William Lewis inquired as to whether there are any
facilities like the proposed facility in the metro area.
Mr. Van Hauer replied that at the present time there are no
facilities exactly like the proposed facility. The
difference is that the proposed facility is rental. Other
facilities offer similar services but are condominiums or
cooperative projects.
Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Van Hauer if Health Central had
experience in the management of facilities similar to the
proposed facility. Mr. Van Hauer told the Commission that
Health Central manages 1 project on Lake Shore Drive, 3 HUD
projects, and will manage 2 other facilities when they are
completed. Mr. Runyan questioned Mr. Van Hauer on the
definition of "On Call Nursing ". Mr. Van Hauer explained
that all units would be equipped with pull cords, most
likely placed in the bathroom and master bedroom. If the
need would arise for quick medical attention the tenant
could alert staff. The staff would be trained for emergency
situations; administering CPR etc. Mr. Van Hauer further
added that the trained staff are not meant to be a
substitute for Police, Fire or other trained emergency
personnel.
Helen McClelland and David Runyan inquired about rental
rates for the project. Mr. Dunbar informed the Commission
that a set rate has not been decided on. Mr. Dunbar -added
that he realizes they have to be market competitive and he
is waiting for results of a survey that addresses the rent
issue. Mr. Dunbar commented that after a preliminary
analysis he felt the rates would most likely be in the
price range of $800.00 on up. A brief discussion ensued on
if meals would be included in the rental price of the unit.
Ms. MCcullough stated that they are looking for a minimum of
one meal a day but they have not yet defined how to
implement the cost. Ms. McCullough said she is waiting for
the market research questionnaire to come back. Ms.
Page 6
McCullough added that she felt for the first few years the
meals would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that that
would mean that each renter would have a small monthly fee
of $10.00- $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additional meal
fee. Ms. Mccullough added that the figure would probably be
closer to $30.00.
Helen McClelland questioned whether or not the units
would be handicap accessible. Ms. McCullough stated that
units would be handicap accessible. Helen McClelland asked
if the age of 75+ was a firm requirement for rental and what
would happen if someone became ill and needed to be
hospitalized for a period of time. Ms. McCullough explained
that the 75+ is an average age quote. Rental can began at
age 55 +. In regard to the health issue The Grandview Team
hopes to develop a occupancy criteria that would address
that issue.
David Runyan asked Fran Hoffman if traffic signals
would be constructed at the site. Mr. Hoffman stated that
the City had targeted this area to be signalized and have
sidewalks put in.
Mr. Dunbar recapped his meeting with the neighborhood
by informing the Commission that most residents were
comfortable with the proposed development and expressed
their belief that the Grandview Team was competent. They
also expressed there dissatisfaction with the present site
and were satisfied that the proposed development would add
to the community.
John Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re-
zoning. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
-85 -7 Gustafson and A c. Preliminary Plat
Approval India Hills 3rd Addition
Lots 1 -15, B1 k 1, Indian Hills 2nd.
Lot 11, Blo 1, The Timbers
Generally Located: ou of Crosstown Highway and West
o eason Road
Mr. Larsen infor d the Commiss that the City
Council granted fin plat approval to ian Hills 2nd
Addition in April, 985. The plat consist of 7 R -2 lots
along McCauley T it and 8 R -1 lots on a new 1 de sac
extending sou from McCauley Trail. Since th t time the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JULY 31, 1985.
Z -85 -3 Dunbar Development Corporation
Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to
Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4
Refer to: Attached preliminary plans, letters from
developer and architect, November 1984
Site Plan
Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south
of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel)
The subject property is a 3.5 acre site which is
occupied by the closed Biltmore Motel. The Commission and
Council approved a Planned Residential District (PRD -4)
rezoning on the property in the fall of 1984 for the
construction of an 88 unit, 4 story condominium project. A
new development team has acquired the property and has
submitted a rezoning request for the purpose of constructing
a seniors citizen rental apartment. The developers are
requesting a rezoning to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to
allow the construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5
and 6 story sections. The building would contain 70 one
bedroom units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms
units. Exterior materials would be brick.
The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2,500,
square of lot area per unit. in PSR -4 with the possibility of
reducing this requirement to 1000 square feet per unit
through a series of allowances. The proposed plan would be
able to achieve the maximum allowance through credits for
underground parking, type I or II construction,
accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen
units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to
Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district.
The Zoning Ordinance establishes special requirements
for unit types, sizes and for community facilities in a
senior citizen apartment building. Listed below are
rage z
Ordinance requirements as they compare with the subject
proposal:
Unit Sizes Zoning Ordinance Subject Proposal
1 Bedroom
550 -650
S. F.
70
at
660
S.
F.
700 for
handicapped
2 Bedroom
750 -850
S. F.
33
at
-795
S.
F.
41
at
900
S.
F.
3 Bedroom
N.A.
8 @
1,070
S.
F.
Community
152 units
X 15
7,950
S.
F.
Spaces
S. F. or
2,280 S.F.
A variance to Ordinance unit size requirements and a
variance to allow 3 bedrooms units would be necessary.
The Ordinance requires that parking be provided at a
rate of .25 space per unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit
surface parking for a seniors residence. For a 152 unit
building this results in 38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface
spaces. The subject proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces
and 51 surface spaces. the proponents have submitted an
alternate plan illustrating 76 surface spaces and have
suggested a proof of parking agreement which would add the
additional spaces if needed. Traffic would access the site
on Vernon Avenue opposite the major intersection
recommended by the Grandview Traffic Study for Link Road.
No access to either west 52nd or 53rd streets is anticipated
by the plan.-
In the Planned Residential District when building
height exceeds 35 feet the setback required is equal to the
height of the building. The proposed building contains
sections which are 36, 45, and 54 in height. Set backs
corresponding to these heights have been provided.
The design of the building provides for greater than minimum
setbacks for much of the building. The PSR -4 district
allows a maximum building coverage of 35 %. The proposed
building would cover 21% which compares to 27% building
coverage for the most recently approved condominium project
on the site.
The first floor of the building would house a variety
of services including.congregate dining for the residents.
The attached letter from the project architect details the
uses and their respective sizes.
The subject property is in the Grandview Area Tax
Increment District. The tax increment district allows the
HRA the ability to offer financial incentives and assistance
Page 3 .
in order to gain desired redevelopment projects. In this
case the developer is requesting capital assistance in the
amount of $1,000,000 for the project. This request will be
considered by the City's HRA in the near future.
Recommendation:
The subject proposal represents a relatively new
concept in seniors housing. It is not intended to replace
the more familiar HUD type subsidized project, but is
intended to serve.a different market. The building would
offer a high level of services to residents including on
call nursing and emergency medical assistance. The concept
is referred to as market rate elderly housing and is
designed for a population of seniors who would not meet the
income limits for other senior housing, and who desire a
level of services not provided by more traditional housing
alternatives. The proponents have commissioned a market
study to determine the demand for this type of housing in
Edina.
There are several land use issues that need to be
addressed concerning this proposal.
Height:
The building contains 4, 5, and 6 story sections with
respective heights of 36, 45, and 54 feet. This compares to
4 stories and a uniform height of 40 feet for the 88 unit
building approved for the site. The architect has chosen to
provide a building which is broken down into three main
units of varied height to reduce the monotony and to add
visual interest to the building. We believe they have
succeeded and have created a more appealing building than
the previous plan. Properties most impacted by the
building's height are to the west along Grandview Lane. Set
backs along this line vary from 40 to 90 feet compared to a
constant 40 feet of the earlier plan. The increased height
allows a.reduction in building coverage which results in
increased landscaped areas. The proponents contend that the
building height results, at least partially, from the need
to have a compact building foot print, allowing shorter
corridors and a more efficient delivery of services.
Seniors Residence Zoning:
The City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response
to HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. these
projects are required to rent only to seniors for the full
40 year term of their mortgage. The buildings contain
primarily one bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms
units, and because of income limits for tenants automobile
ownership is limited. Since this project would not be
controlled by HUD it would be necessary for the City /HRA to
Page 4
limit occupancy. Staff believes this could be accomplished
through a redevelopment contract and deed restrictions.
Unit Sizes:'
The developers contend that their experience indicates
a need to offer slightly larger units with more bedroom
options than HUD projects would allow. The one bedroom, one
bedroom plus den units (considered here as a two bedroom),
and 2 bedroom units are within or very near our Ordinance
requirements. The three bedrooms units would not be
allowed. The proponents claim that the target market
demands larger units with more bedroom options. Staff
supports a variance to allow the proposed unit sizes and
unit mix provided the City can exercise control over
building occupancy.
Parking and Traffic:
The Ordinance requires .75 parking space per unit. .25
of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4 District. The
subject proposal would provide .84 space per unit .5 of
which would be enclosed. the most comparable existing
project in the City would seem to be 7580 York. Parking
provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the subject
proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of which is
enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will provide a
total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per unit
enclosed. .Staff conversations with management at 7500 York
indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting list for
enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase in the
amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking agreement
for surface parking. The proponents have stated their
intention to have BRW, Inc. examine the traffic impact of
the development. Staff would suggest that the entry,from
Vernon be redesigned at a right angle to Vernon.
Conclusion:
The proposed location is shown in the Comprehensive
Plan as suitable for elderly housing, and in staffs'
opinion represents an excellent reuse of this property.
However, our support of the proposal is conditioned upon
satisfactory answers to the concerns raised in this report.
Further, since we have not analyzed the request for
assistance by the HRA for the development we make no comment
or commitment at this time.
``,
V
O
P
2Q
V
N
3
0
3
F
W
(A
Q
Z
o.
PHASE ONE
1 FLOOR PLAN
Wool 52nd Street
PHASE ONE
1 7 I
C2 L..M
A } B S CI I e2
'_ 111 S S I E. I I.
I
d N
B C1 C2 D F '
CL
♦Lrr •LHr I.LM •Lever fLtMr ok.rei E ,C1 �
rNaa
JE
HZ
�LOr
ec�
/roo 1 /rfe'
/lr6
I /w
I.
,- I /row
�_�
I
I r •3
5-
rrra
L 159.
l
nwwe /
FARKINO roeutred Provided
L.vfx/r;4,. /i Me nw. /C' Weet 53rd Street
-�-tc a x , ,7Lr /�o•
PLAN FLOORS 2 - 5 SITE PLAN
•e
I�fff+gyf,cIT/1f ailll
I. K
VERNON HILL
CONDOMINIUMS
/nr ..lah4wr hZ�rN=
RESTUDY
r._
•F: .�j • R < � ii nj'f ��7, -�, r: � h�'i i �, �tjj� ~� �l� �i�l.y Lt
i:k-�i
PARKING g`L�
61 CARS ♦c" AF` 1� rfj SG• ' �e
tl
J
� •f �'f•'�r,:
% '11'., "''� %�:� ,-i ✓�c - L Sid •
/6V
BENIOR! NOU61N0 .,ref 5 `ti L - ~%• A
cc
!' •.( -' S � ReA r �-�- -a y, %I r ` .i �vy�• } • �,�i. gee': f+ � `�
NT rC �iif.J'! rj' � ��. `p. rf''�� �, 'r,ry. � •'�L' i�
_,� x• Kiln,i it -z i ,-i ' �" / ^�, I . '�' ;� {NI ty• � -�• ';�v% '."-`L`'� ,.j `� •_�✓ .: h go � • •;i t'X% ��: :: �1+- "'.,'I. R�:: e f ��. e.l - I! tq� .� f..,�F yi.. .1 ,t , . / � ,- /.' _ t�.- � �1:, �� Y1
/ (�. 4 J i�1.1 ,cw. I rCr•�i c% i�c - . L r ;�. i �' Y
Winsor /FaricyArchitects Inc. Sc"" PfolPct- - - - - -- -- ---------------------- - - - - -- s�n�llt,
Date 1-17-815 Seniors Congregate Housing' SITE PLAN.
5—]n, 79. ,.F Suw' D1nwn B
Srm vrW.4mmr.nu 65If17 Y
611171 fe% Proj. No 6310 -860- 1 Edina, Minnesota for GRANDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO:
na ,
FLOOR t
GARAGE LEVEL
0 20 e0
ru—Lj---1
_ 0 10 30
Winsor /FaricyArchitects,Inc Da "1e 7-17 - Rove °1 - - — _ S,��Nr.
5 ... VS, mow.., r.r,.5,,.�
Dare ,_ „_es Seniors Congregate Housing
s.�i a.d. u.w.�ueeim Drawn By
012 tnow Prof No. 0310 -000 -1 Edina, Minnesota- for GRANDVIEW DIVILOPMINT CO.
6 MmE6
16D 78D ff :!: L '2 It.D
1190 F- 11
0
FLOOR 9
FLOOR 5 '
FLOORS 2.3.4
��
66 ^20 60
^
1 U L- I
0 10 30
WinsodFaricyArchitects,lnc.
Scale 1':30'-0'
Date
Project -- ---
Seniors Congregate Housing
-- -- -- Shot IJo
S—, aN.. .n ,. S Sv.e�
s.,nv.a.r+m�n.ussim
, -„ -86
Di awn By
012 mass
Pro[No 6310 -660 -1
8111118, Nlnnoeoto for ONANDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO.
Dunbar Development Corporation
July 17, 1985
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: A Development Proposal for the Biltmore Site
Dear Mr. Rosland:
We are pleased to submit to the City of Edina, for its
consideration, a development proposal to address a market need
within the community for Assisted Living apartment units.
Our proposal which is located in the Grandview Redevelopment
District on the property known. as the Biltmore Site would
consist,of 152. Assisted Living Apartment Units.
This development concept is directly aimed at a market segment
which is seeking a housing alternative that complements their
living style and needs. Also, it provides the support services
which are needed at this state of their life. They could stay
in their single family homes, but if provided the proper
location, amenity package, and quality building, would opt to
relocate to such a facility. This would then recycle the single
family housing stock within the community. Such a project would
permit the seniors to stay within the neighborhood, community,
and social affiliations which they have had for years. In
addition, it would provide for a secure living environment, with
direct accessibility to support services within the building or
through the management affiliation of Health Central
Corporation.
We have attached as Exhibit "A ", a further elaboration on the
concept which has been developed by Health Central Corporation,
an active member of our development team and a member which
brings to the team, a strong and long -term history )f
participation in health care and senior housing facilities.
5353 Gamble Drive Suite 311 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 (612) 593 -5014
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
July 17, 1985
Page - 2
Exhibit "B" is a design concept developed by Winsor /Faricy
Architects in consultation with Health Central Corporation. We
believe this concept addresses the market in a positive design
approach and reflects the functional needs of the residents. We
are designing the project with more usable open space and
greater building sets backs than exist presently. Winsor /Faricy
has an impressive history in residential design and is a
valuable member of our team.
The development would cost approximately $12,815,000. This
budget would provide for the proper development program
necessary to meet the market with the type of services and
support which has been expressed in the Health Central portion
of this presentation. Exhibit "C" provides a complete breakdown
of the application of funds.
The affordability of the units and services to the residents are
central factors which must be addressed. _ The project must meet
the needs of the residents while maintaining a rent level which
is acceptable to the market. The residents of the development
will be at a stage in life where they have fixed incomes or
fixed asset bases as the sole support for their remaining life.
We must provide this development at an acceptable economic level
to allow the residents to retain their living independence and
pride.
To properly address this market nitch and to provide a facility
that is acceptable in the marketplace in the City of Edina, we
request participation by the City to be applied toward capital
development cost for the project. We request City participation
in the amount of $1,000,000. It is our belief that the
development can repay this source of fund by Tax Increment
within a reasonable time which will justify the community
involvement in this project. Preliminary projections indicate a
pay back in less than the traditional 20 years.
This development addresses directly the objectives of the
Redevelopment Plan created by the City of Edina on May 30, 1984
and related specifically to the objectives for the 'Biltmore
site.
Listed below are some of the factors that would justify the
City's support for the project and the public purp -se
substantiating the City's participation.
1. It provides a housing alternative for a segment of the Edina
Market, thus permitting those people to remain within Edina.
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
Page - 3
July 17, 1985
2. It addresses precisely the goals and objectives in the Land
Use Planning sections, established by the City, for the
Grandview Redevelopment Area.
3. It is a development that does not compete with the existing
senior housing projects that are being constructed within
the City and the surrounding communities because it focuses
on a nitch of the market place different from those
developments. It is not luxurious, but is on the upper
scale of market rate units.
4. It provides the initial development project which t,ien
realizes the economic and development objectives established
within the development the development district plan.
5. It revitalizes a currently nonproductive site into a site
that produces not only a significant tax base and quality
housing, but further has a beneficial ripple effect of being
the basis for creating the momentum for additional
revitalization within the redevelopment district.
6. It increases the tax base within the community.
The development team consists of:
SPONSOR /DEVELOPER
MARKETING, MANAGEMENT
CONSULTANT
ARCHITECTS
LEGAL COUNSEL
Grandview Development Company
c/o Dunbar Development Corporation
5353 Gamble Drive, Suite 311
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Telephone Number: 593 -5014
Health Central Corporation
2810 57th Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430
Telephone Number: 574 -7800
Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc.
28 West Fifth Street, Suite 375
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Telephone Number: 227 -0655
Holmes and Graven
470 Pillsbury Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone Number: 338 -1177
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
July 17, 1985
Page - 4
LEGAL (con't)
MARKET RESEARCH
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Thomsen, Nybeck, Johnson, Bouquet
& Van Valkenburg, P.A.
7250 France Avenue South, Suite 102
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435
Telephone Number: 835 -7000
Health Planning & Management Resources,
Inc.
4970 Lincoln Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Telephone Number: 935 -6077
Johnson Building Company
1020 Southdale Office Plaza
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437
Telephone Number: 831 -8777
(See Exhibit D for Biographical Information)
SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
July /August, 1985 Presentation of Concept to the City of
Edina
July 29, 1985 Neighborhood Meeting
July 31, 1985 Presentation at'Planning Commission
Sept. /Oct., 1985 Finalized Redevelopment Contract
Finalized Drawings
Secure Financing
Confirm Design Drawings.
October,'1985 Receive Final City Approval
November, 1985 Commence Construction of the Project
Winter 1986/1987 Ready for Occupancy.
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
July 17, 1985
Page - 5
In summary, the project needs, and thus our request to the City
of Edina is as follows:
1. Rezone the property to the SR -4 Classification to permit the
apartment complex to be built.
2. Authorize us to enter in to a redevelopment contract with
the City of Edina, wherein we commit to construct a facility
as presented herein and the City provides $11000,000 of tax
increment financed funds, or alternative sources of
financial participation. to assist the economic feasibility
of the project.
We recognize the need for discussions regarding many factors of
this proposal and are prepared to continue our meetings with the
City Staff in order to arrive at an acceptable and marketable
development which will be a credit to the community.
We are very much aware of the concerns of the neighborhood
regarding the current condition of the property and will arrange
for its destruction as soon as we can implement this in
development proposal.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We will
submit a supplement on July 17, 1985 for review' by the Planning
Commission on July 31, 1985. We look forward with tremendous
optimism to working with the City of Edina and developing this
project within the Grandview Redevelopment Plan District.
Should you have any question or need clarification on any of the
material submitted, we would be pleased to meet at your
convenience to discuss or elaborate on any item.
Sincerely,
Frank C. Dunbar
Dunbar Development Corporation
FCD:nr
cc: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
Craig Larson, City Planner
2810 Fifty- Seventh Avenue North • Minneapolis MN 55430 -2496
612/574 -7800
THE
HEALTH
CENTRAL
CORPORATION
00 O
Zw
With 5,000 Americans turning 65 each day, the market for retirement
housing is rapidly growing. Experts predict housing for the elderly will
boom in the late 1980s and the 1990s the way housing for the singles
boomed in the 1970s and early 180s. The number of Americans 65 and older
is growing at an unprecedented rate and their houses no longer suit their
lifestyles driven by substantial improvements in overall health and
favorable income levels. Consider these facts:
o Human life expectancy has increased from 48 years at the turn of the
century to the current 82 years.
• It is expected that from 1980 to 1990 the number of people 65 years
of age and older will increase by more than six million, accounting
for more than one quarter of the United States population's growth.
• Today the elderly comprise over 11% of the population.
o In 1990, nearly 32 million will be age 65 or older with the 85 and
over group doubling its present size.
GROWTH IN THE NUMBERS OF ELDERLY
■ The elderly population is projected to grow dramatically as a
proportion of the total U.S. population.
I PROJECTED PERCENT CHANGES_ l9Rn_1999 1
Total Population
CS.
Age Under 65
115.2%
Age 65-74
113.5%
Age 75-84
47.9%
Source: U.S. Bureau of Census
All these facts and figures have stimulated the housing industry.
Older Americans currently have limited housing options. It is
estimated that as many as 40% are unnecessarily institutionalized; others
own their own homes, which often require increased maintenance costs and
Working together for a healthier you
-2-
rising taxes and utility bills. As well safety and security concerns
create significant housing problems. Still other seniors either rent or
live with family or friends. Research has shown that most seniors prefer
an independent lifestyle.
Clearly, housing alternatives need to be developed for the elderly
of which assisted living is the most logical option. Assisted living,
sometimes referred to as congregate housing, is a community (of
apartment, townhomes, etc.) that encourages self- sufficient (independent)
lifestyle while providing subtle but essential support services such as
meals, housekeeping, safety and security systems and a full range of
social and recreational activities including transportation in a
residential setting.
Security of person and property is the #1 concern of older persons.
Most do not wish to leave their neighborhood that has become familiar to
them over the years; they simply wish to live in a community that offers
an extra measure of protection.
Another type of security desired is to.get away from barriers and
other physical features of their homes or neighborhoods that is a
consequence of sensory or motor impairment which constitutes a hazard for
them.
The 1982 National Council on the Aging's report:.on the "Housing
Choices of Older Americans" indicated 33% of older home owners were
interested in non - traditional housing services such as assisted living.
Though the Minneapolis senior residential housing marketplace is
more mature than the nation as a whole, there are still areas in the
metropolitan area that are in need of senior residential housing. A
preliminary market analysis study conducted by Health Planning and
Management Resources, Inc., in December, 1984, concluded that further
consideration of additional market -rate housing for the elderly is needed
in the Edina area based on the following facts:
o The 1980 census indicated that 14.6% of Edina's total population of
46,073 is aged 65 and older.. This compares with 10.9% of the total
population of Hennepin County and 11.2% of the State of Minnesota.
0 6.3% of Edina's population is aged 75 or over. In Minnesota 5.1% of
the total population is aged.75 years and over.
o According to the state's demographers office Edina had a median
family income of $42,265 based on 1981 income tax returns. This is
the highest among Minnesota's 106 largest cities.
-3-
The preliminary study identifies a 75+ segment of the senior
population needing alternative housing in the Edina area. Seniors
between 75 and 85 are beginning to slow down but are not yet ready for
the rocking chair. For example, they may -enjoy a putting green instead
of a full - fledge golf course. They may want help with meals and
housekeeping. This can be a time of great loneliness for people, too, as
spouses and old friends began to die. Developing new relationships
becomes a very important factor when relocating. This is the prime
market for assisted living.
Types of available services that can be implemented within a senior
residential housing project is attached (See Exhibit 1). Through further
market analysis and consumer research (identification of consumer's needs
and desires) the process of product development for the Edina project
will define services, fee structure, and product design.
As you can see from the changing demographics outlined above,
housing for the senior population is a rapidly growing business.
However, developing financially and socially successful housing for this
special market is difficult and requires expertise in combined
disciplines of real estate, development, health care, insurance and
social services. Also, in the day -to -day operation of the project,
management needs to be prepared to render services as a hotel operator
and a social service agency. Food service, housekeeping, janitorial
service, transportation, social and referral activities and
emergency /security services take assisted living beyond the scope of
normal multi - family management. Due to this needed expertise, Health
Central Corporation has increased its involvement in rendering
development, marketing and management services in respect to senior
residential housing.
Health Central Corporation is a nationally respected, diversified
health care and human services corporation. Health Central's Center for
Aging Services has provided a large spectrum of services to the senior
population such as participation in the development of the Senior Health
Plan, an innovative HMO for the elderly, development of Health Central's
Home Health Care division delivering health care services in the home and
many others. Health Central Enterprises, a subsidiary of Health Central
Corporation, has participated in many senior housing project developments
and has expanded its development and management expertise in condominiums
and apartments alike. Our groundfloor involvement has taken us into all
phases necessary to complete a successful project. Such involvements as
these require expertise in the areas of finance, law, marketing and
management as well as the sensitivity necessary to be such an important
part of home life of the residents (See Exhibit 2).
It is our opinion that with the combined skills and expertise of
Health Central and the developers, the proposed senior residential
housing project located on the Biltmore Hotel site in Edina would be a
total success.
SERVICES FOR
MARKET RATE SENIOR HOUSING
Emergency Call Buttons
TV Security System
24 -hour Security
Laundry Facility
Arrangement with Hospital
Attendant Trained in CPR
Public Transportation Nearby
Lush Landscape
Staff Trained in Gerontology
Convenience Store
Multipurpose Room
Post Office /Mailing Center
Outdoor Exercise Course
Lounge Overlooking Activity
Exercise Room
Beauty /Barber Shop
Library /Reading Room
Informal Breakfast Area
Unit Balcony
Nurse on Call 24 hours
Manager Trained in Gerontology
Small Pool for Exercise
Workshop
Personal Counseling
P1ay"Area for Grandchildren
Gardening Space
Putting Green
Shuffleboard Court
Catering for Parties
Private Duty Nursing Listing
Cafe /Deli
Telephone Reassurance
Home Health Care Services
Office Space for Resident Council
Dry Cleaning Pick -up
Room for Overnight Guests
Auditorium
Physical Therapist
Doctor Office
Craft-Room
Carpenter Service
Adult Education Space
Arrangement w /Nearby Nursing Home
Homemaker Service
Private Transportation
Private Jacuzzi
Xerox /Typewriter Available to Residents
Tours for Pleasure
Blood Pressure Equipment
Room Service
Weekly Visiting Nurse
Arts and Crafts
Greenhouse
Arrangement with Health Club
Laundry Service
Shopping Assistance
Billiard Room
Horseshoes
Winsor/Faricy Architects, Inc. Suite 375, 28 West Fifth Street Architects
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Interior Designers
612 227 0655 Planners
16 July 1985
SENIORS CONGREGATE HOUSING
Edina, Minnesota
For
Grandview Development Company
Mr. Frank Dunbar
Mr. Robert Johnson
5353 Gamble Drive, Suite 311
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
612- 593 -5014
The site is a 3.5 acre parcel fronting on Vernon Avenue between West 52nd St. and West
53rd St. in Edina, and is presently occupied by the Biltmore Motel. The site is triangular
in shape, presenting planning difficulties in providing for proper setbacks, parking and
attractive building massing. The project includes 152 units varying from one - bedroom
to three - bedrooms with common spaces and facilities for a seniors residence, such as
offices and security control, kitchen and dining room , meeting room, game room, exercise
room, craft room, library, guest rooms and ancillary spaces. The 152 units is permitted
by the zoning requirements and is felt to be necessary by the management firm, Health
Central, Inc., in order to provide the level of services desired.
Vehicles would enter and exit the site from Vernon Ave. at the present intersection
and median break. The existing driveway near 53rd. St. would be closed. This proposal
is consistent with the recommendations in the Grandview Area Traffic Study, prepared
for the City of Edina in April 1984. Cars can then proceed along the drive past a surface
parking lot to a porte cochere at the entrance for drop -offs and return to parking or
exit. The visitor lot is proposed at a ratio of one car per four units. Parking for residents
is enclosed and its ratio is one car per two units. Site area is available for additional
surface parking should it be required in the future. Because of the age and life style
of this market, the management and planning team feel that traffic impact on the
neighborhood would be minimal, occurring during off -peak periods.
The building is generally hat shaped in plan with a major recess occurring at the entrance
turning circle and porte cochere. Its height is proposed to step up from four stories
at the ends to six stories in the middle. This scheme is to breakdown the building and
its roofline into units and reduce its overall impact on the site. Alternatives with the
building at a uniform, lower height were considered but not preferred since the structure
became longer and more continuous. The higher building results in a smaller "footprint"
allowing more green space around the building. This is especially advantageous at the
abutting residential property along the west where the present 15 foot setback to the
Biltmore would increase to approximately 54 feet. The planning team feels that the
setting for the building is of primary importance and that generous landscaped yards
are critical to an appealing setting. The exterior of the building is to be primarily
masonry with surface modulation balcony projections and other design features intended
to give a comfortable, familiar residential image to the completed project.
�. " Winsor/Faricy Architects, Inc.
Specific Data:
Site Area:
Zone:
No. of Units:
Lot Area Required:
Building Area:
F.A.R. Required:
F.A.R. Provided:
Lot Coverage Required:
Lot Coverage Provided:
Parking:
Required:
Provided:
Units:
Seniors Congregate Housing
Edina, Minnesota
For Grandview Development Company
Page No. 2
152,427 Sq.Ft. (3.5 A)
PSR4 Senior Citizen
152
152,000 Sq.Ft.
145,046 Sq.Ft.
1.2 max.
0.95
35% max.
21%
Open Enclosed
76 38
51 76
Type Number
Net Area
Area Required by Zoning
1 Bdr. 70
660 S.F.
500 S.F. Minimum
700 S.F. Maximum
1 Bdr. + Den 33
795 S.F.
850 S.F.
2 Bdr. 41
900 S.F.
750 S.F. Minimum
850 S.F. Maximum
3 Bdr. 8
1,070
1,000 S.F.
Community Spaces:
Dining Room:
1,990 S.F.
Kitchen:
576 S.F.
Food Mgr. Office:
120 S.F.
Hobby /Craft:
560 S.F.
Toi lets:
96 S.F.
Library:
636 S.F.
Market Place:
80 S.F.
Lobby:
950 S.F.
Lounge:
950 S.F.
Meeting Room:
320 S.F.
Game Room:
980 S.F.
Exercise Room:
844 S.F.
Security Office:
150 S.F.
Admin. Offices:
1,064 S.F.
Woodworking Shop:
720 S.F.
Total:
10,844 S.F.
Common Space•
Residential Floors
Area Per Floor
Eff.
Floor 1: 5,112 S.F.
Floor 1:
31,610 S.F. 849o'
Floors 2,3,4: 4,314 S.F.
Floors 2,3,4:
26,872 S.F. /Fir. 84175
Floor 5: 4,194 S.F.
Floor 5:
22,858 S.F. 82175
Floor 6: 1,850 S.F.
Floor 6:
9,962 S.F. 81%
RESIDENTIAL 152
SQ. FT.
GROSS 0
NET 0
PARKING STALLS 76
** ***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
TOTAL
LAND
1,500,000
TOTAL
ARCH. & ENG.
270,943
TOTAL
DEVELOPMENT COST
830,000
TOTAL
FINANCING
1,117,998
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION
7,741,235
TOTAL
MARKETING
715,000
CONTIGENCY
640,799
TOTAL PROJECT COST 12,815,975
******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd
4800 EWING AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410
(612) 927 -8849
August 14, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney.
and Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We write in support of the plan for Senior Housing at the Biltmore site
that will be presented to the Edina Council meeting by Grandview Develop-
ment Company on August 19, 1985.
For nearly a year our church has had a committee at work seeking to determine
how congregate housing for middle and upper income people could be provided
in the Southwest Minneapolis and Edina communities where about 90% of our
members live. (Approximately 800 of our members live in Edina). We were
prompted to do this by the awareness that some of our members are moving
from the community - to Richfield, Bloomington, Golden Valley and farther
(� east in Minneapolis - because there aren't suitable alternatives closer to
- where they formerly lived.
During the course of our committee's work we learned of the plan being for-
mulated by Grandview Development Company and have had two meetings with
representatives of the company. We are impressed with how our thinking
coincides with the plans of Grandview, and our committee's intent is to
lend its support to their plan. We also intend to communicate with leaders
of the other churches in Edina, encouraging their support.
The Grandview plan would seem to be the answer to housing needs for many in
our community who no longer wish to live in and maintain their homes. In
turn, homes now owned by senior members would be available to younger
families, a factor that should benefit the schools and churches, as well
as the community at large.
In summary, our Senior Housing Committee is enthusiastic about the plan for
elderly housing in Edina that is being proposed by Grandview Development
Company, and we encourage the Edina City Council to lend its support and
approval.
Sincerely,
V
Harris W. Lee James Engen
Senior Pastor Chairman, Senior Housing
Committee
HWL:ved
V A. > �"
t
N U M B E R S -84 -7 Indian Hills 2nd Addition
Z -84 -1
S -85 -7 Indian Hills 3rd Addition
LOCATION Generally located west of Gleason and south of Crosstown Highway
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Page 6
cCullough added that she felt for the first few year the
m s would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that at
wou1 can that each renter would have a small month fee
Of $10. - $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additio meal
fee. Ms. cullough added that the figure would obably be
closer to $ 00.
Helen McClella \bame oned whether o of the units
would be handicap a. Ms. McCull gh stated that
units would be handssible. Hel McClelland asked
if the age of 75+ w requireme for rental and what
would happen if somme ill an needed to be
hospitalized for a time. McCu llough explained
that the 75+ is an quo Rental can began at
age 55 +. In regard ea ssue The Grandview Team
hopes to develop a occupancy cr eria that would address
that issue.
David Runyan asked Fra Hoffma 'f traffic signals
would be constructed at t site. Mr Hoffman stated that
the City had targeted th' area to be 'gnalized and have
sidewalks put in.
Mr. Dunbar
by informing the
comfortable with
their belief tha
also expressed
and were satis
to the commun' v
eca d his meeting with a neighborhood
Kre ission that most reside Xs were
proposed development and xpressed
Grandview Team was compe t. They
dissatisfaction with the pr ent site
d that the proposed development uld add
ohn Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re-
zoning. elen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in
favor. he motion carried.
S -85 -7 Gustafson and Assoc. Preliminary Plat
Approval Indian Hills 3rd Addition
Lots 1 -151 Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd.
Lot 11, Block 1, The Timbers
Generally Located: South of Crosstown Highway and West
of Gleason Road
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City
Council granted final plat approval to Indian Hills 2nd
,Addition in April, 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots
along McCauley Trail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de sac
extending south from McCauley Trail. Since that time the
Page 7
proponent has acquired lot 11 of the Timbers and is
requesting a subdivision which would add portions of this
lot to the R -1 lots in Indian Hills 2nd Addition. No new
lots are contemplated by this plat. Lots 1 through 7 remain
unchanged from the previously approved plat.
Mr. Larsen explained that lot 11 of The Timbers is an
extremely large neck lot which has access to Timber Ridge
Road. The lot also has frontage on Arrowhead Lake. The
proposed plat would add approximately 75 feet of width to
lots 9, 10, 11; and 12, and would provide lake access to
lots 13 and 14. A large irregularly shaped piece would be
added to lot 8 by the proposed plat. The remaining lot from
the Timbers, which would become lot 16 of Indian Hills 3rd
Addition, would continue to provide a large building site.
Mr. Larsen added that at the time The Timbers plat was
approved a deed restriction was placed on lot 11 which
prevented further subdivisions which would create additional
building sites. This restriction would need to be released
prior to recording the new plat.
Mr. Larsen concluded that staff supports the concept of
the proposed preliminary plat. The proposal greatly
enhances the potential of the lots along Timber Trail while
causing no harm to lot 16 as a building site. The proposal
represents a more efficient use of property. Staff would
suggest some changes in the proposed lot arrangements. As
proposed, lot 14 does not meet our definition for minimum
lot width, that is, a width of 75 feet at a point 50 back
from the street. The lot line between lot 8 and lot 16
should be moved north. The lot line between lot 8 and 9 may
need to be moved slightly south to accommodate the driveway
for lot 8. Any encroachment on the existing wetland would
require permits from the DNR and Nine Mile Creek which may
mean that the lot line adjustment mentioned before would be
a more appropriate approach for access to lot 8. Mr. Larsen
stated that staff recommends approval for the preliminary
plat subject to the preceding modifications and the
following conditions:
1. A revised grading plan for the property in-
cluding the exact location of the wetland area, and
the location of all utility easements.
2. Any necessary permits from the Department of
Natural Resources and the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District.
3. Release of the restriction on the subdivision
of lot 11 of The Timbers.
Helen McClelland moved
subject to staff conditions.
motion. All were in favor.
Page 8
for preliminary plat approval
Del Johnson seconded the
The motion carried.
P -85 -3 Richard Page
7711 Normandale Roa/way Planned Commercial PCD -4
Final Development P
Generall Located: East of State 00
and north of W Street
Mr. Larsen expixined that the s ject property is
located on the Edina- oomington bo der adjacent to the
Highway 100 frontage r d. East ad north of the subject
property is.the Pentagon ffice mplex. To the south is a
Howard Johnson's motel.
The subject property me res 175 feet by 175 feet,
contains 30,625 square feet, d is zoned Planned Commercial
District -4 (PCD -4). The p pe y is developed with an
automobile service center, hich ffers gasoline sales, and
parts and service. The p ponent 's requesting approval of
a Final Development Plan o redevel the site as a car
wash with related car c aning servi e, and gasoline sales.
Mr. Larsen added at the redevel ment plan would
require the granting a number of var nces. Car washes
are required to main in a 45 foot set b k from both the
front street and an side street. The pr osed plan would
maintain a 45 foot et back from Viking Dr i e, but would
maintain a 25 foo set back from West 78th treet. Thus, a
20 foot side stye set back variance is requ sted. The
Zoning Ordinance equires that parking maintai a 20 foot
set back from a treet and 10 feet from an inte 'or side lot
line. Parking s proposed within 8 feet of West 8th
Street, conse ently, a 12 foot parking set back riance is
requested. 0 the northeasterly portion of the si a 5
foot parking et back variance would be required. nce the
Ordinance a ows only one exterior exit per street f ntage,
a variance o allow the second exit to W. 78th Street 's
necessary. The final variance involves required spaci of
driveways The Ordinance requires that driveways be 5 feet
from int sections and be 20 feet from other driveways
measure from the end of the returns. The large returns
result a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing
varian
go propo sed Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the plan as
would provide the required number of parking spaces
and stacking spaces. The proposed exterior materials comply
with Ordinance standards. Except for the West 78th Street
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JULY 31, 1985
5 -85 -7 Gustafson and Assoc. Preliminary Plat
Approval Indian Hills 3rd Addt.
Lots 1 -15, Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd.
Lot 11, Block 1, The Timbers
Generally Located: South of Crosstown Highway and West
of Gleason Road
The City Council granted final plat approval to Indian
Hills 2nd Addition in April, 1985. The plat consisted of 7
R -2 lots along McCauley Trail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de
sac extending south from McCauley Trail. Since that time
the proponent has acquired lot 11 of the Timbers and is
requesting a subdivision which would add portions of this
lot to the R -1 lots in Indian Hills 2nd Addition. No new
lots are contemplated by this plat. Lots 1 through 7 remain
unchanged from the previously approved plat.
Lot 11 of The Timbers is an extremely large neck lot
which has access to Timber Ridge Road. The lot also has
frontage on Arrowhead Lake. The proposed plat would add
approximately 75 feet of depth to lots 9, 10, 11, and 12,
and would provide lake access to lots 13 and 14. A large
irregularly shaped piece would be added to lot 8 by the
proposed plat. The remaining lot from the Timbers, which
would become lot 16 of Indian Hills 3rd Addition, would
continue to provide a large building site.
At the time The Timbers plat was approved a deed
restriction was placed on lot 11 which prevented further
subdivisions which would create additional building sites.
This restriction would need. to be released prior to
recording the new plat.
Recommendation:
Staff supports the concept of the proposed preliminary
plat. The proposal greatly enhances the potential of the
lots along Timber Trail while causing no harm to lot 16 as a
building site. The proposal represents a more efficient use
of property. Staff would suggest some changes in the
proposed lot arrangements (see attached.graphic). As
proposed, lot 14 does not meet odr definition for minimum
lot, - width, that is, a width of 75 feet at a point 50 back
from the street. The lot line between lot 8 and lot 16
should be moved north as shown on the attached graphic. The
lot line between lot 8 and 9 may need to be moved slightly
south to accommodate the driveway for lot 8. Any
encroachment on the existing wetland would require permits
from the DNR and Nine Mile Creek which may mean that the lot
line adjustment mentioned before would be a more appropriate
approach for access to lot 8. Staff recommends approval for
the preliminary plat subject to the preceding modifications
and the following conditions:
L A revised grading plan for the property in-
cluding the exact location of the wetland area, and
the location of all utility easements.
2. Any necessary permits from the Department of
Natural Resources and the Nine Mile Creek
Watershed District.
3. Release of the restriction on the subdivision
of lot 11 of The Timbers.
M-w
-1-1161A D��
.AXE I
Al-c
14
rypr 3b
PRELIMINARY PL
DEVELOPMENT Pi.
INDIAN HILLS 3RD
SURVCVoA - ENGIHM
73 . .......
.... ... 15344
HE Vj T3 CR-S
a
m �
oWNEaD
-AXE
•- 3o I
t
t'.
x
i
��_.on�.r u.9.r •.n....ee l.t..
7ifi ......yt.n ......
�Z�C -GSM N 1�
.mac- M
\
,lot
r
PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT
INDIAN HILLS 3RC
m �
oWNEaD
-AXE
•- 3o I
t
t'.
x
i
��_.on�.r u.9.r •.n....ee l.t..
7ifi ......yt.n ......
�Z�C -GSM N 1�
.mac- M
\
,lot
r
PRELIMINARY
DEVELOPMENT
INDIAN HILLS 3RC
\
\ \ e I Y b• lam• J].�y.', L� 1�
I°° /I /pylL TLMN• Ii••L / / � -)�N T�•
I.awT- a.IYIr G'.. -
0
1 ;^ K•�;,•:. , / �;.''� / /lib/ � ( —��— \\ \I \\ �,•
1 f
/i /�� '� •�! —� / /"�\ \`k PRELIMINARY PLAT
DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1
: •• �� \/ , % / / ��� / \ \ I \ INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION 1
•: I �� / � : y/ / • \ 1 : � 1 i t i 1 `. 1 � M,.o °,y°•y \ �\\ I `° '""' .ICY: t
/��� - // � I I N��•� 1 I ` 1 1 C \ \ \ 1 L» • •.N MY M »»•I .•Lw LM 1•w •I w NN. •I
1 R 1 , 1 t:
1 1 ` ~a+.1•Y•••IW »
•1•Iw I LL4•L waC." »} 1
1 ,'�• w ,t � M.• 1 ». 11. »•» I. IYIY •.LY laa •NII,Ii. YI I
all • /ML L.. •.I / ::• wl"• 11� ,yr:M1,'�„•,:11 , I•a • »• ,w•.•M ,1..a
. •• - Ilpl ,11.11„ / •I » ,
•IRRo N AD
.a
LAKE "' w »1.r .r •.WI,I.. �/' r // PROPOSED LOT REALIGNMENT f
1w1 •..•1./•w Lr.M M. �
u.. nwn•. urwu Lu1• :.- la RON KRUBI OBR B ABBOCIATRB. INC.
/ f
I
11-F
IFIGAL DEVELOPMENT
NUMBER P -85 -3
L O C A T 10 N 7711 Normandale Road
East of State Highway 100
and north of West 78th Street
REQUEST Final Development Plan
EDINA PI_ANNljp \]G DEPARTMENT
Page 8
Helen McClelland moved for at approval
s Del Johnson secon
motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
P -85 -3 Richard Page
7711 Normandale Road
Planned Commercial District, PCD -4
Final Development Plan
Generally Located: East of State Highway 100
and north of West 78th Street
Mr. Larsen expl4ined that the subject property is
located on the Edina - Bloomington border adjacent to the
Highway 100 frontage road. East and north of the subject
property is the Pentagon Office Complex. To the south is a
Howard Johnson's motel.
The subject property measures 175 feet by 175 feet,
contains 30,625 square feet, and is zoned Planned Commercial
District -4 (PCD -4). The property is developed with an
automobile service center, which offers gasoline sales, and
parts and service. The proponent is requesting approval of
a Final Development Plan to redevelop the site as a car
wash,with related car cleaning service, and gasoline sales.
Mr. Larsen added that the redevelopment plan would
require the granting of a number of variances. Car washes
are required to maintain a 45 foot set back from both the
front street and any side street. The proposed plan would
maintain a 45 foot set back from Viking Drive, but would
maintain a 25 foot set back from West 78th Street. Thus, a
20 foot side street set back variance is requested. The
Zoning Ordinance requires that parking maintain a 20 foot
set back from a street and 10 feet from an interior side lot
line. Parking is proposed within 8 feet of West 78th
Street, consequently, a 12 foot parking set back variance is
requested. On the northeasterly portion of the site a 5
foot parking set back variance would be required. Since the
Ordinance allows only one exterior exit per street frontage,
a variance to allow the second exit to W. 78th Street is
necessary. The final variance involves required spacing of
driveways. The Ordinance requires that driveways be 50 feet
from intersections and be 20 feet from other driveways as
measured from the end of the returns. The large returns
result in a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing
variance.
I� Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the plan as
proposed would provide the required number of parking spaces
and stacking spaces. The proposed exterior materials comply
with Ordinance standards. Except for the West 78th Street
Page 9
side the building meets all required set backs. The
proponent has submitted a landscape plan and schedule which
meet the requirements of the Ordinance.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed car wash is a
deluxe facility which should be much more aesthetically
pleasing than a typical car wash and would provide an
improvement over the existing use on the site. the plan
would provide green areas and landscaping where there is now
none. The building is proposed at the smallest possible
.size in which to house the conveyor wash system. Several
alternative site plans were reviewed.in an attempt to
minimize the need for variances and provide smooth function
and traffic flow. The proposed site plan provides the best
arrangement on the site. Mr. Larsen suggested that parking
space number 12 be removed.
Mr. Page was present to explain his proposal.
Mr. Page pointed out to the Commission that the City of
Edina lacked a full service car wash. Mr. Page added that
the present gas station would be demolished and the proposed
car wash /gas station would be built in its place. Mr. Page
stated that he offered an employment agreement to the
man who ran the previous gas station enabling him to run the
proposed gas station /car wash .
Mr. Page informed the Board that he had contacted
Pentagon Park the owners of the adjoining parking lot with
the request to lease additional parking spaces if the car
wash parking demand should increase. Mr. Page was informed
that for a fee of $10.00 per month up to 10 cars would be
able to be parked.
Mr. John Palmer moved approval of the Final Development
Plan. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
P -85- Hoyt Constr
Final Deve
Generally Located: ast o
south
ion
ant Plan
f -lia Circle and
0 f We 8th Street
ti
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JULY 31, 1985
P -85 -3 Richard Page
7711 Normandale Road
Planned Commercial District, PCD -4
Final Development Plan
Generally Located: East of State Highway 100
and north of West 78th Street
The subject property is located on the Edina -
Bloomington border adjacent to the Highway 100 frontage
road. East and north of the subject property is the
Pentagon Office Complex. To the south is a Howard Johnson's
motel.
The subject property measures 175 feet by 175 feet,
contains 30,625 square feet, and is zoned Planned Commercial
District -4 (PCD -4). The property is developed with an
automobile service center, which offers gasoline sales, and
parts and service. The proponent is requesting approval of
a Final Development Plan to redevelop the site as a car
wash,with related car cleaning service, and gasoline sales.
The redevelopment plan would require the granting of a
number of variances. Car washes are required to maintain a
45 foot set back from both the front street and any side
street. The proposed plan would maintain a 45 foot set back
from Viking Drive, but would maintain a 25 foot set back
from West 78th Street. Thus, a 20 foot side street set back
variance is requested. The Zoning Ordinance requires that
parking maintain a 20 foot set back from a street and 10
feet from an interior side lot line. Parking is proposed
within 8 feet of West 78th Street, consequently, a 12 foot
parking set back variance is requested. On the
northeasterly portion of the site a 5 foot parking set back
variance would be required. Since the Ordinance allows only
one entry-orexit per street frontage, a variance to allow
the second exit to W. 78th Street is necessary. The final
variance involves required spacing of driveways. The
Ordinance requires that driveways be 50 feet from
intersections and be 20 feet from other driveways as
measured from the end of the returns. The large returns
result in a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing
variance.
The plan as proposed would provide the required number
of parking spaces and stacking spaces. The proposed
exterior materials comply with Ordianance standards. Except
for the West 78th Street side the building meets all
required set backs. The proponent has submitted a landscape
plan and schedule which meet the requirements of the
Ordinance.
Recommendation:
The proposed car wash is a deluxe facility which should
be much more aesthetically pleasing than a typical car wash
and would provide an improvement over the existing use on
the site. the plan would provide green areas and
landscaping where there is now none. The building is
proposed at the smallest possible size in which to house the
conveyor wash system. Several alternative site plans were
reviewed in an attempt to minimize the need for variances
and provide smooth function and traffic flow. The proposed
site plan provides the best arrangement on the site. Staff
would suggest that parking number 12 be removed.
V�
Oumnn.iA
D
: _ - ' ,�- ;--�
1 INA CARW ASH -
>, ` I
.mow W
tei._aw�. o<lram..i• „. `i.. ...L. _. - i bt/ Jr -rY f..0•� - - ► • i J "�v
•, . ;,. , -r., ,- �',.. `` �'�` � ,• ��; ..... � x .rr � Landscape-Plan-
,=S z 6,-r R - ,�•, -f• r f% / ✓r.' y_ .lei : 12�r+�i t' r 1 - _•F� if i�T -. :�
' "... aIII.J Aw. ra{q�' e�i+1 1 rY ~JI_ �� 1 � �r� p - j'� , , �! � � � f .3 i,{/. -dam/ ••_, .vj'�� y . �.. +� ;; �1!!
-
i
i�.+ar zt poi " -.,' •c y♦ ,:,• _ � �_ ,. y d� .
jsaaa.r ptrtna�•�. was.).: - t . rA �y f"i �• `3'- •J.E`_�i -`: rA f.. •••�I�_ - �- f]r--�l �.�`..i� %�! �•' 1 �1 i ,
-y'-te- '-" r�.7w:.. -tzeemczu�' .. ra. s.v.•a) .. ':c% i
``. , tSa x ro< ` t ':. ✓ r: rfi r. �i�+ 12 I 1 10 °I b 7 (0 5 9 3 i ~' 2 I r
eXI I _- _ • - _ i I •1 . � - _ : _
•;� 1' 'i..r . �;+4j lb 17 iG 15 -14 461
i '. I . +' .°s "' �►. rrt �� .!Y• s f -
f I� . r 4. -, , s" ,•'�>' :l1:ts�,'-:^ . . fl i _ r 1 - - I _�I : S 'ZpNiNiy. 75NCT
_ FcKrNGZaaG Pro
PO� zcViw, Fr,
-
r
e.Y4 F•F,.r-J n6 ON GIT-=
r r' _ .._` "`" +_ Y_ ,.• _ _ - 1* - SFE+�6►'( /GR�61i
1 . /r - ' • - 4 / J.3vr' !•di - G I\ r' to ' - 1 P� EMFLO %£
'f l 1 �^ G 3 %2 RVIG2 bals
- r#I 1-7 FFf�AftV - 18 I'FOJIOEa �,
-u1.• t oFrLE �, I '_ M W I - . .
IF ., - \ -' S � ' �^ rr� �: r- a,n'at,''•:;e.:`� � -21C7E- .•l� ---
! — f ` 1 * ''��' - r••�- ,r • 7 w}r.J.'liF+- .: �r Lr 1.. r� •."�,:�a � -- FI�R'�r �� - ,
I..r
%7074- 6WKINCs 2rr G
�6
✓' '�' 7 r _ 1 r+iVM(,.16VIVD^ i Fl�IUNG 10
i SC t L --
-�- WMr Iz11r440' .
Ln
. uya .i• �„ 1`__ _ ,T � ... , _ 4'3�7316H�M _ . ••f i `..i `i r J•• 5fr' �i(rr a 1 �O
_m _ 1 ,. �✓ i� ! : exit
Ll
C-- �' _ - -1%�: .. �,.-� ,.r o' ;rat. ` i•. .4 � �� - j. � -• �:
�R . _ s O r �': - -ice. �, • '� s
aic --f; cbartL:A�lriuct
-7
0
.x[24 SlA 1— p
EDINA
3 1'-e rU 4
Pt le
�51
1� f�14
91 \-�\7
mcbrmdm
,Ja� (Vag*mnd�
ex
f-V
lb 17 1(. is
P, X
CVL.Azev P060H
enfrj
r
V
C11
=%3tr-
.'e,
24 A
e)(
Ln
1 7
t.
CARWASH --
flWa,ev ZCHIWP FL'
fe" bwr/c^w4"
fek WATLZME-oa-
x ?- -C-jtm ca bals
grqvgw mpmw
SM 35 .
lKmAm zr2,,
r?.4wrc. jo
......... W' F~20
EDINA, -- CARWASH
Elevations —
&99A" Mr.
Ift.0-T V-75
Axtrf
G6-Z"
Ll
NORTH
Page • Ziebarth Architects
tects
..........
S
FJAAL DEVELOPMENTm
NUMBER P -85 -4 PLAN
L O C A T 10 N 5555 1Y, 78th Street
Lot 2, Block 2, 9 Mile Creek W Addition
Lot 1, Block 9, Interchange Center
REQUEST Final Development Plan
EDINA PLANNING' DEPARTMENT
Page 9
-de the building meets all required set backs. Thjr
p onent has submitted a landscape plan and sched a which
mee the requirements of the Ordinance.
Mr. sen concluded that th/ee sed r wash is a
deluxe faci 'ty which should be mre a thetically
pleasing than typical car wash uld rovide an
improvement ov the existing use te. the plan
would provide gr n areas and lan where there is now
none. The buildi is proposed aallest possible
size in which to ho a the conveysystem. Several
alternative site pla were reviean attempt to
minimize the need for riances aide smooth function
and traffic flow. The oposed sn provides the best
arrangement on the site. r. Largested that parking
space number 12 be removed.
Mr. Page was present to elain his proposal.
Mr. Page pointed Yd t tFa he mmission that the City of
Edina lacked a full ser wa Mr. Page added that
the present gas statio be de •lished and the proposed
car wash /gas station w built its place. Mr. Page
stated that he offereemploymen agreement to the
man who ran the previostation en ling him to run the
proposed gas station /c .
Mr. Page informe the Board that he ha contacted
Pentagon Park the ow rs of the adjoining pa ing lot with
the request to leas additional parking spac if the car
wash parking deman should increase. Mr. Page s informed
that for a fee of 0.00 per month up to 10 cars would be
able to be parked
Mr. John P er moved approval of the Final Development
Plan. John Sk rberg seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The mo on carried.
P -85 -4 Hoyt Construction
Final Development Plan
Generally Located: East of Cecilia Circle and
south of West 78th Street
Page 10
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject
property is a 5 acre parcel zoned Planned Industrial
District, PID. The site is developed with small warehouse
building located in the south central portion of the lot.
PID properties are located to the west and northeast of the
site. Property to the north is vacant, but was recently
zoned for townhouses and apartments. Property to the south
is in the City of Bloomington and is developed with similar
uses. The proponent has submitted plans which contemplate
the redevelopment of the site with an office - warehouse
building of 72,390 square feet.
Mr. Larsen added that the proposed building would be
evenly split between office and warehouse uses. In the PID
Zone office space must provide parking at a rate of 5 spaces
per 1000 square feet of gross floor area and warehouse space
must provide parking at a rate of one space for each 2000
square feet of gross floor area. The proposed plan would
provide 209 parking spaces where 199 are required.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the exterior materials of
the building would be brick with copper trim. These
materials comply with Ordinance requirements.
Mr. Larsen continued that the redevelopment of the site
would require a number of variances. The most northerly
corner of the building maintains a set back'of 56 feet where
75 feet is required. Parking and drive aisles encroach into
required set backs along the northerly portion of the site.
The required 10 foot parking to building set back is not
provided at several points along the north and east sides of
the building.
Mr. Larsen concluded that the site is large relatively
flat parcel with no obvious limitations to its
redevelopment. There are areas of poor soil in the
southwesterly portion of the property and a steep slope
along northerly property line. These conditions do not
limit the ability to redevelop the site. Except for the 100
foot inset of the property line in the northeast corner of
the property staff can identify no compelling reasons that
variances are warranted for this proposal. Mr. Larsen
stated that staff recommends denial of the Final Development
Plan.
The proponents Mr. Bradley Hoyt and Mr. Bill Anderson
of Design Partnership were present.
Mr. Anderson with the aid of graphics described to the
Commission the site of the proposed warehouse. Mr. Anderson
stated that the area has a large amount of natural
vegetation and combined with the slope of the land makes
the visual impact of the site minimal. Mr. Anderson further
Page 11
explained to the Commission reasons why the development of
this parcel requires variances.
Mr. Hoyt stated that the proposed warehouse design is
very attractive. The intrusion of the corner totals 6/10 of
1% of total warehouse space. Mr. Anderson added that to
maintain the geometry of the structure the corner would have
to remain as proposed. If the corner was moved back to
comply with staff requests the warehouse structure would
loose 3,000 square feet. Mr. Hoyt continued by informing
the Commission that Hoyt had a previous plan that would not
have required variances, but that warehouse design did not
allow adequate parking. This new warehouse design enables
the site to supply adequate parking for the tenants.
David Runyan felt that one of the positive aspects of
the project was.its irregular building shape by pointing
out that most warehouse structures are boxlike. Mr. Runyan
added that he also felt that a honest attempt was made to
soften the structure with landscaping. Mr. Runyan further
added that he found no problem with the corner and reflected
the opinion of the proponents that to change the corner
would affect the geometry of the structure. Del Johnson
commented that he has seen the completed warehouse structure
the proponents have constructed in Bloomington and that the
structure is very attractive.
Mr. David Runyan moved to approve the project and the
variances. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. William
Lewis, Del Johnson and John Skagerberg voted aye. Helen
McClelland voted naye. The motion carried 5 -1 vote.
LD -85 -9 Ron Clark Constru ion, Inc.
6500 -02 GleasZeason rt
of 5, Block Court
Request: Pa wall to sion
Mr. Larsen informed the ission that the proponent
is requesting a party wall to vision of an existing
double bungalow.
Mr. Larsen stated tha the prop ed division meets
Zoning Ordinance require is for the 'vision of R -2
properties.
Mr. Larsen conclyfed that staff recomd%pds approval.
John Palmer mood for approval of the loll division.
Helen McClelland se nded the motion. All were in favor.
The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JULY 31, 19'85
P -85 -4 Hoyt Construction
Final Development Plan
Refer To: Attached Plans
Generally Located: East of Cecilia Circle and
south of West 78th Street
The subject property is a 5 acre parcel zoned Planned
Industrial District, PID. The site is developed with small
warehouse building located in the south central portion of
the lot. PID properties are located to the west and
northeast of the site. Property to the north is vacant, but
was recently zoned for townhouses and apartments. Property
to the south is in the City of Bloomington and is developed
with similar uses. The proponent has submitted plans which
contemplate the redevelopment of the site with an office -
warehouse building of 72,390 square feet.
The proposed building would be evenly split between
office and warehouse uses. In the PID zone office space
must provide parking at a rate of 5 spaces per 1000 square
feet of gross floor area and warehouse space must provide
parking at a rate of one space for each 2000 square feet of
gross floor area. The proposed plan would provide 209
parking spaces where 199 are required.
Exterior materials of the building would be brick with
copper trim. These materials comply with Ordinance
requirements.
Redevelopment of the site would require a number of
variances. The most northerly corner of the building
maintains a set back of 56 feet where 75 feet is required.
Parking and drive aisles encroach into required set backs
along the northerly portion of the site. The required 10
foot parking to building set-back is not provided at several
points along the north and east sides of the building.
Recommendation:
The site is large relatively flat parcel with no
obvious limitations to its redevelopment. There are areas
of poor soil in the southwesterly portion of the property
and a steep slope along
conditions do not limit
Except for the 100 foot
northeast corner of the
compelling reasons that
proposal. Staff recomm
Plan.
northerly property line. These
the ability to redevelop the site.
inset of the property line in the
property staff can identify no
variances are warranted for this
ends denial of the Final Development
LOOATIOM MAP
NO SCALE
l�
7 EXISTING RETAINING WALL
_ 20' SETBACK
LIT STATION .
YM EA13T. 0' V .Erg
Al
NORTH
1 317E PLAN /UTIUTY PLAN
ry �.� \o7y t BRIDGE
C. I
N IV
•2• .24, 1\ +III /fi' 11 I
I
177' ....
r 20 BETrACK I
6" TRACK
\ III
\
SITE INFORMATION
SITE AREA • APPROL 6 ACRES• /1 7.000 SP
BUILDING AREA • 72.770 BP
SITE COVERAGE- 77%
OPFlCE • 70.126 SP & 11700. 71
WHSE.•30.106BPevs00- 7t
REQUIRED PARKING SPACES • 102
PROVIDED PARKING SPACES • 206
HANDICAPPED SPACES • 6
a
ZQ
Za
{C1al �E
N7
d
l
t
r
r`
r _
<�NtZz
LOCATION MAP
NO SCALE - --
COSTING RETAINING WALL
ANN \� \\
ADMM WA"
� ��• . \
I if 'eie ! (—
seo'. ul 4l _ e3x I 1 FLOOR ELEV.— 833
824— 'i qq .._ lexe I I ex
ca
—Ex-. aaeo /
e2Y. I 1
81 414.11
r ,
NORTH
GRADING PLAN
Ax =�o^o
LOQA71ON MAP
NO SCALE .
IVY
• EXISTING RETAINING WALL
` EXISTING TREES C
AND SHRUBS
SODDED 1
1
r
N TH
1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTE: SOD FROM CURB LINE TO NATURAL
AJ 1' . AO' -C' AREA ANO OTHER DISTURBED
AREA ON NORTH
BIDE OF PROPERTY
LANDSCAPE NOTES
S9 OVERSTORY TREES
3S UNDERSTORY TREES
13 LARGE SHRUBS
197 SMALL SHRUBS
RETAINING WALL
` II 1
\ � � � IVY 11 1
1 \ /
I 1
•s JIII
.I R I it
Z
5
a
co
ASH. MARSHALL'S
FRAXMUS PENNSYLVANIA LANCEOLATA
ASH
XS
112
BB
®t
NADIENT CRAB
NALUS RADIENT
BB
BLACK HILLS SPRUCE
SPA
SS
�
RUSSIAN OLIVE
BB
PICEA OLAUCA DENSATA
11
S,
�•y
ELAEAONUS AN DUSTIFOW
(.ZA
XONEYSUGNIE 2ASEL9
LONICEA NOROLNOW ZASELf
IS,
POT
00000
�• BOSTON
PARTHENOUSSUB TRICUSPIDATA
R.44
POT
RED TWIG DOGWOOD
(2pejo
JUNIPER. ANDORRA
POT
000
CORNUS STOLONIFER
RTD
9
1S'
POT
�'6r
JUNivERUS HORQONTALIS'PLUMOSA'
WILTON CARPET JUNIPER
WCJ
18
18
POT
EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS
JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'W4TONI'
®
CURRENT. ALPINE
AC
143
1Y
I POT
RIBES ALPINUM
S9 OVERSTORY TREES
3S UNDERSTORY TREES
13 LARGE SHRUBS
197 SMALL SHRUBS
RETAINING WALL
` II 1
\ � � � IVY 11 1
1 \ /
I 1
•s JIII
.I R I it
Z
5
a
co
PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN
r-
PHINITED
AU G 1.41985
{
_T1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager (E�/
�
SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
DATE: August 16, 1985
The Council granted preliminary approval of the ten -year Capital Improvement
Plan on July 1, 1985 . We noted at that time that a Capital Improvement
Plan is considered to be part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and, as
such, had to go through the same adoption process as the Plan itself. This
process is: 1) Approval by the Planning Commission; 2) Approval by the
City Council and transmittal to the Metropolitan Council; 3) Review by
Metropolitan Council; and 4) Adoption by the City Council.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 31, 1985, and
approved the C.I.P. If the City Council now wishes to approve the C.I.P.,
we recommend that it adopt a resolution approving the City of Edina's
Capital Improvement Plan, 1986 -1995, and authorize its submission to the
Metropolitan Council.
The attached C.I.P. is identical to that approved by the Council on
July 1, 1985 . However, we have identified those items which constitute
new construction or major additions in accordance with the Council's
request.
GH /sw
Page 12
*Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ten Year Capital Improvement
Program.
Jerry Dalen was present to answer any questions the
public or Commission may have on the issue.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Capital
Improvement Plan was considered a part of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, and that amendments to the plan must
originate before the Commission at a public hearing. He
further informed the Commission that the Council had held
several hearings on the proposed CIP and had given it a
preliminary approval pending this public hearing.
Mr. Palmer noted that no members of the public were
present for the public hearing.
David Runyan moved to pass the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Ten Year Capital Improvement Program to the City
Council for consideration and adoption. Helen McClelland
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
carried.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
I
CAPITAL PLAN - 1986
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
GENERAL FUND:
Voting machines
City Hall - air conditioning
Public Works Building:
Overhead crane
$ 10,000
Exhaust system
10,000
Fire Department:
Parking lot
$ 4,000
Computer terminal
10,000
Storm Sewers - Watershed projects
Parking Ramps - 492 Street- Sealing
Streets:
France avenue from West 50th Street to
Excelsior Blvd.(North City limit)
$250,000
West 50th Street from Halifax to Highway 100(one -half)
650,000
West 772 Street from West 77th Street to .12 mile
east of France (one -half)
250,000
Alley:
East of France (small lengths)
$ 15,000
West 51st Street to West 52nd Street between
Oxford and Bedford
16,000
West 51st Street to West 52nd Street between
Hankerson and Williams
20,000
Bridges:
Browndale and Minnehaha Creek
Street Lighting:
West 50th Street from Halifax to Highway 100(one -half)
Sidewalks and Paths:
France from West 40th Street to West 48th Street
$ 77,000
Maloney from Blake to County Highway 18
65,000
Benton from Hansen Road to Highway 100
44,000
Parks:
Cornelia School - Regrade, sodding and building
renovation
$ 25,000
Normandale- Regrade, fencing, trees and refurbish
50,000
Lewis -Two tennis courts
40,000
Valkenburg - Improvements - (One- fourth)
125,000
Wooddale School:
Demolition building (one- fourth)
25,000
Improvements - (One -half)
50,000
Parking lot
100,000
Gun Range - Parking lot
TOTAL GENERAL AND RELATED FUNDS
$ 100,000
35,000
20,000
14,000
20,000
30,000
1,150,000
51,000
90,000
200,000
186,000
415,000
3,000
$2,314,000
CAPITAL PLAN - 1986
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
UTILITIES FUND:
Lift Station - Monterey, Grimes and Englewood.
Replace with single Flygt station
Lift Station - 72nd and Tracy - Emergency power
Wells - Braemar and Gleason - Pull pumps (two)
Wells - Brookview Heights and Mirror Lakes.
Replace recorders (two).
Wells - Halifax and Southdale - Replace boost pumps(two)
GOLF COURSE:
Maintenance building
Club house addition
Reconstruct - Par three course
Rip -rap on #3 and #7 water holes
TOTAL
FUNDING PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Special assessment
Budget (operating)
Bond sale (Golf Course)
Transfer from Utilities Fund - Rent
Cash on hand - Van Valkenburg Park - sale of gravel
Working Capital Fund - Income on investments
State - aid Construction Account
Watershed District - (Shared cost)
Earnings:
Utilities
Golf Course
TOTAL
$100,000
5,000
20,000
3,000
3,000 $ 131,000
$250,000
600,000
350,000
20,000 1,220,000
$3,665,000
$ 389,000
97,000
1,200,000
100,000
78,000
404,000
1,236,000
10,000
$131,000
20,000 151,000
$3,665,000
BUDGET (OPERATING)
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS(ASSESSED)
Beginning balance January 1, 1986
$217,287
REVENUE
" EXPENDITURES
1986 $ 50,000
$ 62,000
205,287
1987 50,000
58,000
197,287
1988 50,000
17,000
230,287
1989 50,000
37,000
243,287
1990 50,000
59,000
234,287
1991 50,000
22,000
262,287
1992 50,000
36,000
276,287
1993 50,000
36,000
290,287
1994 50,000
1995
35,000
305,287
50,000
50,000
305,287
$500,000
$412,000
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS(GENERAL)
Beginning balance January 1, 1986
$ 49,583
REVENUE
EXPENDITURES
1986 $ 50,000
$ 50,000
49,583
1987 50,000
45,000
54,583
1988 50,000
50,000
54,583
1989 50,000
40,000
64,583
1990 50,000
114,583
1991 50,000
164,583
1992 50,000
214,583
1993 50,000
264,583
1994 50,000
15,000
299,583
1995 50,000
10,000
339,583
$500,000
$210,000
SUMMARY:
Capital Improvements (Assessed)
$412,000
Capital Improvements (General)
210,000
Wooddale School (Demolition)
100,000
$722,000
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
WORKING CAPITAL
Beginning balance at
January 1, 1986
$125,000
TRANSFER FROM
UTILITIES UND
INCOME
DISBURSEMENTS
1986
- $ 100,000
$ 300,000
$ 504,000
21,000
1987
100,000
350,000
438,000
33,000
1988
100,000
400,000
504,000
29,000
1989
100,000
400,000
523,000
6,000
1990
100,000
425,000
517,000
14,000
1991
100,000
425,000
488,000
51,000
1992
100,000
450,000
532,000
69,000
1993
100,000
450,000
462,000
157,000
1994
100,000
450,000
329,000
378,000
1995
100,000
450,000
2249000
704,000
$1,000,000
$4,100,000
:$4,521,000
STATE -AID CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
STATE (CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT)
Beginning balance at January 1, 1986
$ 486,638
128,550
145,550
447,550
754,550
1,156,550
1,576,550
2,009,550
2,440,550
2,966,550
3,602,550
INCOME
DISBURSEMENTS
1986
$ 877,912
$1,236,000
1987
900,000
883,000
1988
925,000
623,000
1989
950,000
643,000
1990
975,000
573,000
1991
1,000,000
580,000
1992
1,000,000
567,000
1993
1,000,000
569,000
1994
1,000,000
474,000
1995
1,000,000
364,000
$9,627,912
$6,512,000
$ 486,638
128,550
145,550
447,550
754,550
1,156,550
1,576,550
2,009,550
2,440,550
2,966,550
3,602,550
TEN YENR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMTED
JULY 1, 1985
- DESCRIPTION.
CXT
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
SLI'VARY:
Expenditures:
General
Swimming Pool
$13,858,000
124,000
$2,311
$1,759
$1,482
$1,511
$1,301
$1,131
$1,246
$1,242
$1,026
$ 849
Art Center
62000
7
100
10
7
Gun Range
47,000
3
5
5
5
9
12
5
36
Recreation Center (Arena)
320,000
10
23
20
25
4
50
73
100
10
10
24
TOTAL GENERAL & M ATED FUNDS $14,411,000
$2,314
$1,774
$1,517
$1,536
$1,460
$1,251
$1,355
$1,288
Liquor
165,000
10
35
60
$1,043
$ 873
Utilities
854,000
131
131
97
70
30
30
Golf course
1,565,000
1,220
125
100
100
100
125
45
35
45
45
50
TOIAL
$16,995,000 $3,665 $1,915 $1,649 $1,666
--------------------- = ---- -- -- -- ------ _-
$1,615
$1,326
- -- -`--
$1,490
$1,048
$1,433
$1,188
REMAJE
__- _________=
==-
-a - -_= ---- - --- --
------------------
Special assessments
Budget (operating)
$ 2,331,000
722,000
$ 389
97
$ 223
$ 200
$ 248
$ 254
$ 161
$ 220
$ 221
$ 190
$ 225
Civil Defense
34,000
128
14
92
10
102
99
22
36
36
50
60
Debt -bond sale
1,200,000
1,200
10
Transfer -Rent
Cash on hand
1,000,000
234,000
100
78
100
78
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Other Funds
7,000
78
Working Capital Fund
State Aid
3,521,000
6,512,000
404
1,236
338
883
404
423
7
417
388
432
362
229
124
Watershed District
50,000
10
10
623
10
643
10
573
580
567
569
474
364
Earnings:
10
Liquor
Utilities
165,000
854,000
131
10
131
35
97
60
70
30
30
Golf course
365,000
20
100
100
100
125
- - --
-
--
--
- --
125
45
35
45
45
50
$16,995,000 $3,665 $1,915
= aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aasaaaaaaaaaaaaa=
$1,649 $1,666 $1,615
a= aaaaa ==
$1,326
$1,490
_
$1,433
$1,188'
$1,048
==-- a�a= aaa= a_a -__= __- �______-
TEN YFAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMATED JULY 11 1985
DESCRIPTION CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
G EPAL FUND:
Voting Machines R $ 100,000 $ 100
Communications System (Telephone) R
City Flail:
Air Conditioning System R
Replacement Windows R
Heating System R
Replacement Carpeting. R
TOTAL CITY HALL
Public Works Building:
Overhead Crane R
Exhaust System R
* Double Deck -two bays R
* Public Works Building:(Danen Area) B&R
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS
Fire Department:
* Parking R
Upgrade - mobile radio units R
* Computer Terminal R
Heating & Air conditioning R
*7 Energy Program - Insulation,
Ceiling Fans, Etc. R
* Utility Vehicle- (carry rescue
equipment) R
* Addition- second floor R
Replacement Carpeting R
* Opti.- Cortm(traffic control system).R
TOTAL FIRE DEPARIMWr
60,000 $ 60
$ 35,000 $ 35
25,000 $ 25
35,000 $ 35
15,000 $ 15
$ 110,000 $ 35 $ 60 $ 25 $ 15 $ 35
$ 10,000 $ 10
10,000 10
40,000 $ 90
300,000 75 $ 75 $ 75. $ 75
S 360,000 $ 20 $ 115 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75
$ 11,000 $ 4 $ 7
18,000 $ 18
10,000 10
10,000 10
15,000 $ 15
35,000 35
125,000 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25
5,000 5
50,000 25 25
S 279,000 $ 14 $ 17 $ 50 $ 48 $ 50 $ 50 $ 25 $ 25
Police Department:
Convert alert system from phone
to radio
R&CD $
Convert five sirens
R&CD
* Addition to city hall -(1600 sq.ft.
R
* Computer aided dispatching
* Mobile data terminals (15)
R
* Mobile command communication van
R
R
* Forensic photographic laboratory
Alarm monitoring
R
computer R
* Equipment and vehicle for non -sworn
security force (City owned alarm
s stem
28,000
40,000
100,000
75,000
45,000
45,000
40,000
50,000
$ 28
$ 20 $ 20
100
$ 75
$
45
$
45
$
40
$ 50
y ) R 30,000
$ 30
'I� DEPARIIP $ 453,000 $ 28 $ 20 $ 120 $ 75 S 45 $ 45 $ 40 $ 50 S 30
1'tld 1UQi LAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 11 1985
DESCRIPTION
G ENERAL FUND (CONY.):
Storm Sewers:
ESTIMATED
CODE Cif 1986
1987 1988 1989
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
Slipline-Country Club Area
Watershed Projects
R $ 500,000
R&W 100,000 $ 20
$ 20 $ 20 $ 120
$ 120 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100
TOTAL STOM S'M;
S 600,000 $ 20
$ 20 $ 20 $ 120
$ 120 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100
Parking Ramps:
Sealing (surface and joint):
49 1/2 Street R&B $ 100,000 $ 30 $ 20
51st Street R&B 20,000 $ 25 $ 25
$ 20
TO'PAL PARKING RAMPS $ 120,000 $ 30 $ 20
$ 20 $ 25 $ 25
Parking lots:
City Ball- resurface R $ 25,000 $ 25
Grandview - resurface R&D 15,000
50th Street Area - resurface R 20,000 $ 15
$ 20
TOTAL PARKING LOTS $ 60,000 $ 25
$ 15 $ 20
Streets:
Reconstruction:
France Ave. from w. 50th
to Excelsior Blvd. SA $ 250,000 $ 250
Braema v
B1 d f
r . ran Gleason
to Valley View
SA
Wooddale from W.50th to Valley View
SA
W.50th- Halifax to 100
SA
W.69th from France to Xerxes
SA
Valley View from Mark Terrace
to McCauley Trail
SA
W. 54th - from France to Wooddale
SA
W.66th- France to 100
SA
Kellogg,Oaklawn,Brookview fran
W.52nd St. to W.56th St.
R
W.69th St.- Valley View to Wooddale
SA
W.66th St.- Xerxes to Valley View
SA
W.66th- Valley View to 100
SA
* New Construction:
W.77 1/2 Street from W.77th St.
to .12 miles east of France
SA
684,000 $ 684
390,000 $ 390
1,300,000 650 $ 650
195,000 195
165,000 165
395,000 $ 395
500,000
S 500
500,000
565,000 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100
570,000 565
835,000 570
435 400
500,000 250 250
$6,849,000 $ 1,150 $ 900 $ 750 $ 684 $ 395 $ 600 $ 665 $ 670
$ 535 $ 500
Bridges:
Browndale to Minnehaha Creek R $ 90,000 $ 90
Valley View to Soo Line Railroad R 20,000 $ 20
Benton Ave & Soo Line Railroad R 25,000 $ 25
TOTAL BRIDGES $ 135,000 $ 90 $ 20 $ 25
Street Lighting:
Conversion from mercury vapor to
low pressure sodium R $ 300,000 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 .$ 75
50th St. from Etalifax to 100 -
underground powerlines A 400,000 $ 200 200
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $ 700,000 $ 200 $ 275 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75
* Sidewalks and Paths:
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
France from W.40th St. to W,48th St.
SA
$ 77,000
CITY OF EDINA
Maloney from Blake to County 18
SA
65,000
JULY 11 1985
Lincoln Dr, from Maloney to W. 7th St SA
ESTIMATED
$ 33
Interlachen from Blake to W.7th St.
DESCRIPTION
CODE C0ST
1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
GENERAL FUND (O0[VT.):
96,000
1994 1995
Alleys:
$ 96
to Vernon
County 158, Link Rd. to County 62
East of France
B&A $ 15,000
$ 15
Olinger Blvd, from Tracy to
W.51st St. to W.52nd St.
148
Mud Lake Trail
(Two locations)
B&A 36,000
36
Tracy from North side County 62 to
TOTAL ALLEYS
$ 51,000
$ 51
Valley View
Bridges:
Browndale to Minnehaha Creek R $ 90,000 $ 90
Valley View to Soo Line Railroad R 20,000 $ 20
Benton Ave & Soo Line Railroad R 25,000 $ 25
TOTAL BRIDGES $ 135,000 $ 90 $ 20 $ 25
Street Lighting:
Conversion from mercury vapor to
low pressure sodium R $ 300,000 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 .$ 75
50th St. from Etalifax to 100 -
underground powerlines A 400,000 $ 200 200
TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $ 700,000 $ 200 $ 275 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75
* Sidewalks and Paths:
France from W.40th St. to W,48th St.
SA
$ 77,000
$ 77
Maloney from Blake to County 18
SA
65,000
65
Lincoln Dr, from Maloney to W. 7th St SA
33,000
$ 33
Interlachen from Blake to W.7th St.
R&A
67,000
$ 67
Blake from Interlachen to Vernon
SA
96,000
Glengarry Parkway from Interlachen
$ 96
to Vernon
County 158, Link Rd. to County 62
R&A
R&A
62,000
148,000
62
$
Olinger Blvd, from Tracy to
148
Mud Lake Trail
R&A
31,000
31
Tracy from North side County 62 to
Valley View
SA
23,000
23
Benton from Hansen Road to 100
SA
44,000
44
East and West Frontage Roads from
Valley View to Eden
R&A
172,000
Valley View from 100 to Wooddale
SA
44,000
172
Concord from School Rd.to
44
Valley View
SA
15,000
Wooddale from w.50th to Valley view
SA
123,000
15
W. 58th from Concord to Xerxes
SA
102,000
$ 123
W.54th from Wooddale to France
SA
42,000
102
Valley View from 100 to Maddox Lane
R&A
33,000
42
Maddox Ln. fran Valley View to Wyman
R&A
10,000
33
Wyman from Maddox Ln.to W.63rd
R&A
6,000
10
6
DESCRIPTION
*GENERAL FUND (COMP.):
Sidewalks and Paths (Cont):
W.63rd & Ridgeview Rd. fran Wyman
ESTIMATED
CODE COST
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
to Ridgeview Drive
R&A
$ 23,000
$ 23
Valley Ln. from Doran Ln. to W.66th
SA
38,000
38
W.66th from Ridgeview Dr. to
Valley View
SA
96,000
$ 96
W.69th from Valley View to York Ave.
SA
7,000
$ 7
W.70th from Valley View to France
SA
8,000
8
France from Gallagher Drive
to South City Limits
R&A
48,000
$ 48
Parklawn Ave. from Gallagher Dr. to
21 feet west of York Ave.
R&A
26,000
26
York Ave. from W.66th to W.69th
R&A
34,000
34
W.76th from Parklawn to York Ave.
R&A
48,000
48
York Ave. from W.76th to W.78th
R&A
24,000
24
Parklawn Ave & W 77th St. from
76th to Edina Industrial Blvd.
R&A
69,000
69
Metro Blvd. from W.70th to
Edina Industrial Blvd.
SA
75,000
75
Edina Industrial Blvd. from
Metro Blvd. to W.78th St.
SA
32,000
$ 32
W.78th fran Edina Industrial Blvd.
to Cahill Rd.
SA
11,000
11
W.74th St.,Bush Lake Rd.,Dewey Hill
Rd., from Metro Blvd. to Cahill Rd.
R&A
48,000
48
Gleason Rd. from Valley View to
Dewey Hill Rd.
SA
94,000
94
Valley View fran Gleason Rd. to
McCauley Trail
SA
104,000
104
McCauley Tr.South & McCauley Tr.
North Fran Valley View to Gleason
R&A
138,000
138
Ohms Lane fran W.72nd to W.74th
R&A
23,000
$ 23
W. 60th fran France to Xerxes
SA
44,000
44
Lincoln Dr. from W.7th St. to
1000 feet South
R&A
16,000
16
Braemar Golf Course
R&A
105,000
105
Xerxes, W.70th to Yorktown Park
R&A
19,000
19
Along County 18 fran 1000 feet
south of W.7th to Creek
R&A
32,000
32
TOTAL SIDEWALKS AND PATHS
$2,355,000 $ 186
$ 64 $ 90 $ 244 $ 491 $ 263 $ 258 $ 256 $ 264 $ 239
DESCRIPTION
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMATED JULY 1, 1985
CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
GENERAL FUND (CONE.):
Parks:
Cornelia School - Regrade, Sodding &
building renovation
R&T $
Normandale- Regrade, fencing,
* refurbish and trees
R&T
Lewis -two tennis courts
R&T
Countryside school- Regrade,
team benches, dugout and fencing
R&T
Braemar Ccmplex:
Football & soccer field - regrade
and bleachers
R&T
* Picnic area
R&T
McGuire -hard surface play area
*
R&T
Walnut Ridge - Irrigate system & trees
R&T
* Pamela:
Hard surface play area
R&T
Backstop ,dugouts,benches,fencing
R &T
Playground equipment
R&T
* Parking Lot - Resurface
R&T
Irrigate baseball fields
R&T
Arneson Acres:
* Water and irrigation
R&T
Lighting
*
R&T
Walkways - garden
R&T
Remodel garage & greenhouse _
*
R &T
Conmunity Center -Light tennis courts R&T
* weber - Irrigate baseball fields
R&T
Heights - backstop
R&T
* Todd:
* Benches,plantings, drainage
R&T
Renovation,parking lot,house removalR&T
* Creek Valley School:
* Fencing and planting
R&T
Drinking fountain
*
R &T
Dugout and benches
R&T
* Light tennis courts
R&T
Cbowen- curbing, backstop, & fencing
R&T
Lake Edina:
* Fencing
R&T
Playground equipment
R &T
Parking lot improvements
R&T
Regrade & irrigate ballfields
R&T
* Light tennis courts
R&,T
25,000 S 25
50,000 50
40,000 40
20,000
20,000
25,000
15,000
30,000
11,000
10,000
10,000
15,000
15,000
5,000
6,000
5,000
25,000
20,000
8,000
2,000
5,000
50,000
10,000
5,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
6,000
12,000
6,000
3,000
6,000
$ 20
20
25
15
30
$ 11
10
10
15
15
5
6
5
25
20
$ 8
$ 2
5
25 $ 25
10
5
4
6
8
$ 6
12
6
3
6
TOTAL PARKS
SWIM4ING POOL:
Replacement of boards
Replace filter system
Rennovation pool
Seal parking lots
Lights
TOTAL SWIMING POOL
ART CFNrER:
Roof Replacement
Sealing parking lot
Building rennovation
TOTAL ART CENTER
$1,626,000 $ 415 $ 310 $ 272 $ 150 $ 40 S 58 $ 108 $ 126 $ 117 $ 30
R $ 7,000 $ 7
R 40,000 $ 40
R 60,000 60
R 10,000 $ 10
R 7,000 $ 7
$ 124,000 $ 7 $ 100 $ 10
$ 7
R $ 9,000 $ 9
R 5,000 $ 5
R Y48,000 $ 12 $ 36
$ 62,000 $ 9 S. 12 $ 5 $ 36
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
JULY 1, 1985
ESTIINITID
- __--- _DESCRIPTICN
ODDE
COST
1986
1987 1988 1989
1990 1991 1992 1993
1994 1995
GEIERAL FUND (CONT.):
Parks (cont):
44th St.- fencing and planting
R&T $
10,000
Yorktown:
$ 10
Renovation (dugouts,fencing
* team benches,planting)
R&T
31,000
Light tennis courts
R&T
10,000
31
Garden:
10
* Hockey boards and planting
R&T
11,000
* Light tennis courts
R&T
6,000
$ 11
Strachauer:
6
* Tennis courts
*
R&T
20,000
Parking lot
*
R&T
10,000
$ 20
VanValkenberg:
10
* Improvements
Shelter Buildings:
R&H
500,000
$ 125
$ 125 $ 125 $ 125
Walnut Ridge
R&T
100,000
Garden Park
* Wooddale School:
R&T
150,000
$ 75 75
100
Demolition building
B
100,000
25
25 25 25
Improvements
R&T.
100,000
50
50
Parking lot
A
100,000
100
TOTAL PARKS
SWIM4ING POOL:
Replacement of boards
Replace filter system
Rennovation pool
Seal parking lots
Lights
TOTAL SWIMING POOL
ART CFNrER:
Roof Replacement
Sealing parking lot
Building rennovation
TOTAL ART CENTER
$1,626,000 $ 415 $ 310 $ 272 $ 150 $ 40 S 58 $ 108 $ 126 $ 117 $ 30
R $ 7,000 $ 7
R 40,000 $ 40
R 60,000 60
R 10,000 $ 10
R 7,000 $ 7
$ 124,000 $ 7 $ 100 $ 10
$ 7
R $ 9,000 $ 9
R 5,000 $ 5
R Y48,000 $ 12 $ 36
$ 62,000 $ 9 S. 12 $ 5 $ 36
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMi1TID JULY 1, 1985
DESCRIPTION CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
GUN RANGE:
Trap House
Trap Equipment
Equipment pistol range
Renovation building
Target equipment
* Parking lot
TOTAL GUN RANGE
RECREATION CENTER (ARENA):
New lights
Furnace
Recondition Icemaking Equipment
Ice Resurfacer
Floor pavilion
*Balcony 6 sidewalk in pavilion
Glass Boards
Recondition pavilion
TOTAL RECREATION CENIWARENA
LIQUOR:
R $ 5,000 $ 5
R 5,000 $ 5
R 5,000 $ 5
R 25,000 $ 25
R 4,000 $ 4
R 3,000 $ 3
$ 47,000 $ 3 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 25 $ 4
R $ 10,000 $ 10
R 23,000 S 23
R 20,000 $ 20
R 50,000 $ 50
R 73,000 S 73
R 100,000 $ 100
R 20,000 $ 10 $
R 24,000 10
$ 24
S 320,000 $ 10 $ 23 $ 20 $ 50 $ 73 $ 100 $ 10 $ 10 $ 24
Reseal parking lots E
Cash registers E
Replace carpeting E
Replace heating & air conditioning E
7MAL LIQUOR
$ 35,000 $ 10 15 $ 10
50,000 50
20,000 5 $ 15
60,000 15 15 $ 30
$ 165,000 $ 10 $ 35 S 60 $ 30 $ 30
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTIMATED JULY 1, 1985
DESCRIPTION CODE OCIST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995
UTILITIES:
Replace lift stations with single
Flygt station:
Monterey,Grimes,& Englewood
E
$ 100,000
$ 100
Division
Rolling Green
E
E
30,000
$ 30
White Oaks
E
30,000
30,000
30
$ 30
Dakota
72nd & Tracy - emergency power
E
E
30,000
5,000
$ .30
Replacement of lines:
5
Arden from 50th street south
to Bruce Place
E
40,000
90 ,
Bruce from 50th St.south 350 feet
E
40,000
Country Club area- replace
40
steps in manhole
E
45,000
45
Pull Two Pumps:
Braemar & Gleason
E
20,000
20
Tower & Alden
E
20,000
20
Pamela & Alden
E
20,000
20
Brookview Heights & Mirror Lake -
replace recorders
E
3,000
3
Iialifax & Southdale- replace
boost pumps
E
3,000
3
Rercof pump houses:
Wooddale & Sherwood
E
6,000
6
Hanson
*New well and p:mrphouse
E
7,000
7
E
425,000
_
$ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 125
TOTAL UTILITIES
$ 854,000
$ 131
$ 131
$ 97 $ 70
$ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ )25
T
s�
TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN
CITY OF EDINA
ESTLb91TED
JULY 1, 1985
— DESCRIPTION CODE OOST
1986
1987 1988 1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994 1995
GOLF COURSE
*
Maintenence Building D
*
$ 250,000
$ 250
Clubhouse Addition
* D
600,000
600
Reconstruct- Par three D
350,000
360
Rip Rap on 13 & 17 -water holes E
20,000
Driving Range Building E
129,000
20
Dredging ponds E
45,000
$ 125
Parking Lot E
35,000
$ 45
Upgrade old clubhouse E
45,000
$ 35
Bridge replacement -hole 17 & 18 E
45,000
$ 45
Resurface cart paths E
50,000
S 45
TOTAL GOLF CXRSE
$ 1,_565,
- - --
$1,230
- ---
----
----
$ 50
GRAND TOTAL
-000
'—
$16,995,000
$3,665
_ _ ____
$1,915 $1,649 $1,666
$ 125
�~
$ 45
$ 35
90
$ 45
--'-'
- --
$ 45 $ 50
----- - ---
--
$1,615
$1,326
$1,490
$1,433
$1,188 $1,048
CODE
A- A:SrSShnjr
B- BUDGEr (OPERATING)
CD-CLVIL D17MSE (STATE)
E- EARNINGS
T- TRANSFER (UTILITIES FUND)
H -CA!MI ON IM
0-011IER FUND
R- RESERVE (WORKING CAPITAL FUND)
SA- SPATE AID
W- VATERSHED
D-DEBT
* New Items or Additions
NOTE- YEARLY TVrnrc ARE IN THOusmW OF DOLLARS
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina adopted the Comprehensive Plan 1980
on December 31, 1981, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development and Planning Commission of the City of Edina
has approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 on July 31, 1985; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has reviewed such amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan 1980 and is in concurrence with the decision of the Com-
munity Development and Planning Commission;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that
the City Council hereby adopts the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 as
it applies to the Ten Year Capital Plan.
ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 30th day of August, 1985.
City Clerk
TO: Mayor and City Council "
FROM: John Wallin, Asst.Finance Director
.,A: Kenneth P.osland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: August 19,1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
1984 Citation-II 4 Door Hatchback Sedan
Quotations /Bids:
Com any Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Iten Chev $6,888.00
2. Jay Kline Chev 7,200.00
3. Suburban Chev 8,011.00
Department Recommendation: Iten Chevrolet for $6,888.00
Finanra
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement/
The recommended bid is �/ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
r
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
AUGUST 13, 1985 _
9:00 AM
Members Present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Gordon Hughes
Alison Fuhr
Lois Coon
Members Absent: Craig Swanson
Staff Present: Joan Waterstreet
Staff Absent: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department
Others Present: Ronaele Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane
Ann Shimer, 5021 Edinbrook Lane
Cliff Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane
Robert E. Green, 5017 Edinbrook Lane
Bob Chadwick, 5113 West 48th Street
Mrs. Leo Hughes, 5036 Edinbrook Lane
Lorraine Purdy, 5020 Edinbrook Lane
Section A
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
1. Request for traffic safety and warning signals at the railroad crossing
on West 49th Street near Brookside Avenue.
Request received from Cliff Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane and several other
area residents.
ACTION TAKEN:
Cliff Sayre opened the meeting with a request of what the next step was,
after petitioning, in order to make the intersection a safer crossing.
According to the residents represented, the problem is two-fold: the
intersection is marked with stop signs only, at present, and persons
ignore the signs; and also the brush and weeds along this intersection
drastically impair the vision of the driver who does obey the signs.
Bob Chadwick stated that the Soo Line trains frequently blow whistles
when approaching, but that this is not always the case.
-
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
August 13, 1985
Page 2
Fran Hoffman suggested that the intersection be reviewed by representa-
tives of MINDOT to ascertain if flashers are necessary or if.the present
traffic control devices were sufficient and also to have the intersection
cleared by the City of all excess weeds and brush.
Gordon Hughes moved that the brush and weeds be removed by the City and
that the Committee endorse the citizen's petition. Lois Coon seconded
the motion. Motion carried 4-0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
1.- Request for restricted parking and signing on Olinger Boulevard at Sherman
Circle for Bredesen Park.
Request received from Paul Brown, 6137 Sherman Circle.
ACTION TAKEN:
Fran Hoffman reported certain residents of the area feel that due to noise
and traffic, daylight hourly restrictions should be placed on the parking
bay•
Lois Coon suggested that the new parking area seemed to be alleviating the
problem somewhat and that the City should not restrict the park area based
on complaints of citizens who moved into that area after the park had been
established. Lois Coon moved that the parking bay be left as is and the
parking and signing request be denied. Gordon Hughes seconded. Motion
carried 4-0.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
NONE.
Respectfully submitted,
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney S Council Members
FROM: Leslie Turner
SUBJECT: REPORT SUGGESTING A PROCESS FOR APPOINTING CITIZENS TO BOARDS
AND COMMISSIONS
DATE: August 16, 1985
PURPOSE
To design a process for recruiting, selecting and appointing citizens to
City advisory boards and commissions and report to the Council by August
19, 1985.
METHOD
A. Survey other comparable cities for information on their process.
B. Draft recommendation for review by City staff.
C. Revise.draft submitted to Council for approval 8/19/85 and implementation
9/9/85.
FINDINGS
A. Eight cities were contacted: Minneapolis, Plymouth, Minnetonka, St. Louis
Park, Golden Valley, Eden Prairie, Richfield,.Woodbury.
B. Five of eight use an application form; the other three request a letter
of interest from the citizen.
C. All advertise openings in local newspapers; some also use Cable TV; one
also sends notice of openings to civic organizations.
D. Seven of eight interview all applicants; in six of seven cities, the whole
Council interviews each candidate.
E. Most have written information about each board /commission.
RECOMMENDATION
A. Council solicits applications by article in Sun Newspaper and City Newsletter
annually (November) and when needed to fill unexpired term. Article
directs citizen to obtain application form from City Clerk's office.
Summary information about boards /commissions and application form are
given to the citizen.
B. Council interviews candidates at 6:00 P. M. before a regular Council
Meeting in January (or as needed). Council given copies of applications
in packet for that Council Meeting.
C. Appointment made at the regular Council Meeting the evening of the inter-
views. Terms start February 1 (or immediately if filling unexpired term).
D. Current situation: Application form sent to all current candidates
8/20/85; due back 9/1/85; Council interviews and appoints 9/9/85.
E. Draft application form and summary information about boards /commissions
attached.
F. This process applies to filling openings only, not to reappointing present
members.
August 16, 1985
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
RATIONALE
A. Edina is fortunate to have many talented people to serve in an advisory
capacity to the City Council. An open appointments process is critical
to tapping that rich resource.
B. An application form provides comparable information on every candidate
which helps to make an objective decision.
C. Interviews are seen by other cities as very helpful to the decision making
process.
NAME
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS
ADDRESS
HOME PHONE WORK PHONE
NUMBER OF YEARS RESIDENT OF EDINA
EMPLOYMENT (Firm and occupation /profession)
CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
PREVIOUS PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or appointive)
EDUCATION
ZIP CODE
Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory
board /commission and why you are interested in serving:
APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE:
Community Development & Planning Commission
Edina Park Board
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Human Relations Commission
South Hennepin Human Services Council
Edina Recyling Commission
DATE
SIGNATURE
Heritage Preservation Board.
Advisory Board of Health
Traffic Safety Committee
Building Construction Appeals Board
Edina Art Center Board
The Edina Foundation Board
Feel free to use the back of this sheet - - - Please return to City Clerk's office.
INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS TO EDINA'S ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS
General Information
The City of Edina if fortunate to have.over 100 citizen volunteers serving on its
advisory board and commissions. These volunteers directly influence the policies,
actions and progress of Edina by serving in an advisory capacity to the City Council.
Citizen involvement improves the quality and responsiveness of public decision - making.
The City welcomes citizen interest in serving on these boards /commissions. Application
forms and additional information may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk's office
at 927 -8861. All positions on boards /commissions are appointed by the City Council.
Community Development and Planning Commission
Meets: 7:30.p.m. Wednesday before._first Monday of the month
3 year term -:.11 members
Purpose: Reviews development plans and advises the Council on all aspects of the City's
growth and development, including amendments to the comprehensive plan, zoning,
platting, changes in streets and other matters of a general planning nature.
Edina Park Board
Meets: 7:30 p.m. 2nd Tuesday of each month
3 year term - 11 members including member of School Board and member of CDPC
Purpose: Develop and review plans for the acquisition and development of parks and
recreation - facilities and development of recreation programs and make
recommendations to the Council.
Board of Appeals and Adjustments
Meets: 5:30 p.m. 1st and 3rd Thursday of each month
3 year term - 4 members
Purpose: Hear and decide requests for variances to various zoning regulations
requested by residents and /or developers.
Human Relations Commission
Meets: 7:30 p.m. 3rd Tuesday of each month
3 year term - 12 members, including six Council and six School Board appoint-
ments /one college /one high school appointment (one year)
Purpose: To secure for all residents of the community freedom from discrimination
and to advise the Council on human relations and human services issues.
South Hennepin Human Services Council
Meets: 7:30 p.m. 3rd Wednesday of each month at Creekside Center in Bloomington
2 year term - four members from each of four cities
Purpose: Advises City Councils on delivery of human services in South Hennepin area,
pursuant to a joint powers agreement between Bloomington, Eden Prairie,
Edina and Richfield.
Edina Recycling Commission
Meets: 7:00 a.m. 2nd Thursday of each month
2 year term - six members
Purpose: To assist and advise the Council on matters relating to the establishment
and operation of a recycling center in Edina.
-2-
Edina Heritage Preservation Board
Meets: 7:30 p.m. 4th Tuesday of each month
2 year term - seven members, including Hennepin County Historical Society
representative
Purpose: To advise the Council on matters concerning identification and preservation
of buildings, lands or areas of particular historical, architectural,
cultural or educational significance.
Edina Advisory Board of Health
Meets: On call. Four regular meetings a year
2 year term - 9 -12 members
Purpose: Advise, consult with or make recommendations to the City Council (Board of
Health) on matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and
evaluation of community health services.
Traffic Safety Committee
Meets: 9:00 a.m. Tuesday before 2nd Council Meeting
Three staff members and two citizen members
Purpose: Review requests for traffic control devices and other traffic safety en-
hancements and forward recommendations to the City Council.
Building Construction Appeals Board
Meets: On call.
3 year term - five members, plus Building official plus alternate
Purpose: Consider appeals by persons from decisions made by the Building official
or the Bureau of Fire Prevention, or the Public Health Sanitarian, in the
application of ordinances of the City regulating building construction.
Edina Art Center Board
Meets: 4:.00 p.m. 3rd Wednesday of each month
3 year term
Purpose: Develop and review plans for the development of the Edina Art Center and
make recommendations to the City Council concerning art activities and
art programs.
The Edina Foundation Board of Directors
Meets: On call.
3 year term - Nine directors; three appointed by Council, three by the School
Board and three by The Foundation
Purpose: To provide funding through grants of money and property for community
projects which cannot be funded with City or School District dollars.
_-O - 0
5400 Oaklawn Avenue
Edina, MN
August 14, 1985
Mayor Courtney and City Council Members
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Gentlemen, Mrs. Turner and Mrs. Kelly:
I am sincerely interested in being considered for the current vacancy on
the City's Planning Commission and would be pleased.to answer your questions
at Monday evening's Council meeting.
I believe in supporting the community through civic activities and currently
enjoy working with the following:
o. Member of Human Relations Commission since 1979,
o Member of the Board of Directors, Executive and Personnel Committees
of Storefront /Youth Action since 1984
I am experienced in employee benefit design, planning and financial management
and work at General Mills.
I have already had some experience with housing planning in Edina. In 1980 I
worked for several months with the mayor's advisory committee on housing. The
committee developed recommendations, with the strong support of the Planning
Department staff, for the mayor and council members to use in preparing the
City's Comprehensive Land. Use Plan on Housing. (The committee's recommendations
contained options for land use development during the 1980's..)
Again, thanks for your consideration.
S
G
i
40
_E)
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: HOMART FINAL E. I. S.
DATE: August 14, 1985
On July 23, 1985, the City of Edina submitted the attached letter
summarizing its comments and recommendations concerning Homart's
Draft E. I. S. These comments and recommendations were in accordance
with the Council's direction.
Bloomington has now released a Final E. I. S. which is scheduled for
approval by the Bloomington City Council on August 26, 1985. This
approval is termed the "adequacy decision" and, if so rendered,
essentially concludes the environmental review process, except for
certain publication requirements,
Bloomington is obliged to respond in the Final E. I. S. to all comments
and recommendations received from agencies and individuals who reviewed
the Draft E. I. S. Bloomington need not agree with the comments and
recommendations; they must merely "respond."
The following is a summary of the issues raised by Edina and the response
contained in the Final E. I. S.:
ISSUE
1.4.4. Project violates trans-
portation element of Bloomington's
Comprehensive Plan.
3.0. Reasonable alternatives not
investigated.
3.4. No -build alternative based
on unrealistic assumptions.
4.1.3.1. E.I.S. should quantify
increase in Metro Council projections.
RESPONSE
Disagree. Project produces only minor
increases in traffic noted in Plan.
Disagree. However, F.E.I.S. includes
brief analysis of developments of
one million square feet and two
million square feet.
Disagree. No changes in assumptions.
Reasons for increasing projections
given but request to quantify is
not addressed.
August 15, 1985
Ken Rosland
Page Two
ISSUE
RESPONSE
4.1.3.2. Projections ignore hotel and Hotel and ancillary uses not significant
ancillary uses. More information and can be ignored. No additional
needed to compare trip generation information provided. Disagree
with other studies. Trip generation that generation is optimistic.
- is optimistic rather than worst case.
4.1.3.3. Traffic distribution analysis
diverts too many trips away from 494.
4.1.3.4. E.I.S. ignored contribution
of traffic generated by other
approved projects; e.g. Northland
Plaza.
Hedberg analysis shouldn't be
relegated to Appendix.
4.1.4.1. E.I.S. should provide break-
down of traffic volumes as to source.
E.I.S. should evaluate ramp terminals.
494 projections arbitrarily reduced
from 137,000 to 100 - 105,000.
4.1.4.2. E.I.S. should provide con-
clusion of impacts on 494.
Disagree.
Northland's presence was assumed in
.Metro Council projection.
Disagree.
No breakdown provided.
No evaluation provided.
Projections agreed to by Metro
Council staff.
F.E.I.S. cites letter received from
MnDOT.
In summary, no data, analyses or conclusions have been materially changed by
virtue of our comments and recommendations.
GH /sw
r
mw"".,
g"EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
July 23, 1985
City of Bloomington
2215 West.Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
ATTENTION: RICK GESHWILER
Dear Mr. Geshwiler:
The City of Edina wishes to submit for your consideration the following
comments and recommendations concerning the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement ( "D.E.I.S. ") for the Homart Project ( "Project ") at I -494 and
France Avenue in Bloomington.
1.4.4. Relationship to Adopted Local and Regional Comprehensive Plans
The City of Edina ( "Edina ") disagrees with the finding that the Project
is consistent with the Bloomington Comprehensive Plan. This section should
be amended to acknowledge that the Project will cause forecasted traffic
volumes in Traffic Assignment Zone 823 to exceed those volumes forecasted
by the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan.
3.0. Alternatives
Edina believes that reasonable alternatives to the Project have not been
discussed, particularly alternatives which consider reductions in the mag-
nitude of the Project. The three "build" alternatives contained in the
D.E.I.S. address only subtle variations in the design and geometrics of
adjoining local streets. We do not believe that these are alternatives
to the Project within spirit and intent of the Environmental Review Program.
A discussion of the subtleties of these various intersection designs may be
appropriate elsewhere in the D.E.I.S. but should not.be elevated to the status
of "alternatives to the project." The D.E.I.S. should be amended to consider
legitimate alternatives to the project.
3.4. No Build Alternative
Edina disagrees with the assumptions upon which the No Build Alternative is
based. First, we do not believe that the realignment and /or reconstruction
of 77th Street, 78th Street and Johnson Drive are contingent on this Project.
The inference that these improvements will never be undertaken without the
Homart Development disregards the commitment of Edina and Bloomington to.
undertake these improvements and ignores Bloomington's ability to secure the
necessary right -of -way for these improvements by eminent domain, if necessary.
S
July 23, 1985
Rick Geshwiler
Page Two
Second, the assumption that an equivalent amount of development will occur
elsewhere in Transportation Zone 823, even if the Project is not developed,
has no basis in fact. We disagree with the three stated bases for this
assumption. First TAZ 823 is not large but in fact is one of Bloomington's
smallest zones. The majority of the zone is in Edina, which imposes vastly
different density limitations. Second, we cannot substantiate the market for
office space in this zone. Third, we question the availability of other sites
within this zone. If such sites are available, perhaps their redevelopment
potential should be considered in conjunction with, rather than in lieu of, the
Project for purposes of evaluating traffic impacts. In our opinion, the
assumption that no adjoining roads will be improved plus the assumption that
an equal amount of development will occur elsewhere in Bloomington, north of
I -494, between T.H. 100 and France Avenue, portrays an incomprehensible and
totally unrealistic basis upon which to evaluate the No Build Alternative.
The D.E.I.S. should evaluate the No Build Alternative on the basis of realistic
and supportable assumptions.
4.1.3.1. Background Traffic
We do not understand the last sentence of this section: "Metropolitan Council
year 2000 projections were adjusted upward to account for the difference in
trip generation expected for the Homart Development versus that assumed in
developing the year 2000 projections." The D.E.I.S. should quantify the
difference in the expected versus the assumed trip generation.
4.1.3.2. Trip Generation
This section states that: " Homart is not emphasizing the multiple land use
- concept and will not propose any reduction in the P. M. peak hour generation
rates." Yet, the P. M. trip generations have ignored the 350 -room hotel and
ancillary services. The hotel and ancillary services should be included.
It is difficult to compare the suggested trip generation rates to other studies
and reports. The D.E.I.S. should provide estimates for average daily trips and
percent of P. M. peak hour trips to assist in this comparison. A table which
compares the proposed trip generations with other.referenced studies would
also be appropriate. Based upon,the information provided, Edina believes that
the D.E.I.S. presents an optimistic estimate.of trip generations rather than
a worst case.
4.1.3.3. Traffic Distribution
This section states a desire to analyze the "worst case" example regarding
traffic distribution, the worst case being traffic directed to I- 494 /France
during P. M. peak hours. The D.E.I.S. states that "no attempt was made to
arbitrarily divert trips based on assumed congestion." However, this is
apparently what this analysis does. It appears to us that 21% of I- 494 /France
oriented trips have been diverted to: 1) Industrial Boulevard & T. H. 100;
2) Southbound France: and 3) Northbound France to CSAH 62. We disagree with
the assertion that a worst case analysis has been undertaken when 21% of the
traffic desiring to use I- 494 /France has been diverted. We are particularly
critical of the assumption that 8% of such trips will use France and CSAH 62,
July 23, 1985
Rick Geshwiler
Page Three
given the present status of those roadways. The D.E.I.S. should, if a worse
case analysis is to be made, evaluate traffic distribution with more con-
servative trip distribution assumptions.
4.1.3.4. Trip Assignment and Traffic Operations
P. M. peak hour traffic volumes include: 1) Existing volumes (1984 MnDOT
counts); 2) Volumes from the Project; and 3) Volumes from the proposed
Winfield Project in Edina. We are concerned that some developments have
been approved, constructed or occupied in the vicinity of I- 494 /France that are
not included in the above volumes such as the Northland Plaza Project. The
D.E.I.S. should be amended to include traffic volumes from such developments.
Other analyses contained in the D.E.I.S., which rely on these traffic volumes,
should likewise be amended.
The D.E.I.S. conducted an analysis of capacity assuming development of the
Hedberg property in Edina. This analysis is contained in Appendix A which
is stated to be of information only and not part of the D.E.I.S. Edina
disagrees with the statement that the analysis of the Hedberg property is
not part of the E.I.S. and is provided for information only. An analysis of
this land is in every respect a critical element of evaluating the impacts of
the Project and should be included in the D.E.I.S. and not relegated to
appendix status.
4.1.4. Alternative Analvsis
4.1.4.1. Methodology
This section assigns intersection volumes and provides capacity analyses for
the 77th Street and 78th Street intersections with France Avenue. These
analyses are shown in Tables and Figures 4.1.4.1. and 4.1.4.2. The basis for
the traffic volumes included in these figures and tables is unclear. We
believe that the E.I.S. should provide a breakdown of the various components
which contribute to the traffic volumes shown on these figures and graphics.
In our view, these components are: 1) MnDOT 1984 counts; 2) Developments
approved, constructed or occupied which are not included in MnDOT counts;
3) Homart estimated volumes; 4) Winfield estimated volumes; and 5) Hedberg
estimated volumes. Each of these components should be.quant.ified to provide
the basis for the referenced figures and tables.
The D.E.I.S. provides calculations for the I- 494 /France interchange. This
calculation should be expanded to include an analysis of the ramp terminals
and the impacts on I -494 itself as required by the Scoping Decision.
The D.E.I.S. notes that year 2000 estimates by the Metropolitan Council for
I -494 are 137,000 vehicles per day. Yet, the D.E.I.S. concludes a more
reasonable volume is 100,000- 105,000 vehicles per day. Notwithstanding the
comments in the D.E.I.S., we suggest that the D.E.I.S. estimates were
arbitrarily determined and have no basis in fact. The Metropolitan Council
estimates should be used for analysis purposes or reasons should be stated
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager )!� v
SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE ADDITION
DATE: August 16, 1985
It is still our recommendation that we use a Construction Manager for
the Braemar Clubhouse Addition.
At to this memorandum are the duties that a Construction Manager
performs before construction and during construction. We feel this
will be a cost effective way to remodel Braemar. Although our experience
is limited with a Construction Manager, we feel that at worst it will
cost no more than the normal approach in using a general contractor.
The complexities of the addition to the Clubhouse seem to merit this
approach.
SUMMARY OF DUTIES OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
UNDER STANDARD FORM OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Preconstruction Phase
A. Provide preliminary evaluation of the program and budget, prepare
preliminary estimates of construction costs and provide cost evaluations
and alternative materials and systems.
B. Review designs during development, advise on site use and improvements,
selection of materials, building systems and equipment and methods
of delivery, and provide recommendations as to overall coordination
of the project and cost factors.
C. Periodic review and coordination of construction schedules and services
of Construction Manager, Architect and Owner.
D. Prepare a more detailed estimate of Construction Costs and update
and refine them periodically and recommend corrective action if
Construction Costs exceed budget.
E. Coordinate Contract documents with drawings and specifications and
recommend alternatives when construction feasibility, cost or schedules
are affected.
F. Provide recommendations regarding the assignment of responsibilities
of safety precautions and programs, temporary Project facilities
and equipment, materials and services for the common use of contractors.
G. Advise on separation of various categories of work and the method
to be used in selecting Contractors and awarding Contracts and recommend
a method of coordinating the various Contractors and to minimize
jurisdictional disputes.
H. Develop construction schedule as to commencement and completion
of construction for each Contractor.
I. Recommend a schedule for purchase of materials and equipment and
coordinate and expedite delivery of same.
J. Analyze and review availability of appropriate categories of labor
required for critical phases and recommend actions to avoid labor
delays.
K. Identify applicable requirements for equal employment opportunity
programs.
L. Recap mend criteria for bidders and assist with Bidding Documents
and informing bidders.
,y
M. Assist Architect in receiving bids, prepare bid analyses and recommend
awarding or rejecting of bids.
N. Assist Architect with pre -award conferences with bidders, assist
Owner with preparation of Construction Contracts and advise as to
acceptability of Subcontractors and material suppliers.
V,
SUMMARY OF DUTIES OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
UNDER STANDARD FORM OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
Construction Phase
A. Provide administration of Construction Contracts.
B. Provide administrative, management and Construction Superintendent
to coordinate the work of the contractor and to carry out the re-
quirements of the Agreement.
C. Schedule and conduct pre- construction, construction and progress
meetings and distribute minutes therefrom.
D. Update and reissue the Project Construction Schedule.
E. Endeavor to achieve satisfactory performance.
F. Revise and refine estimate of Construction Costs and prepare cash
flow reports and forecasts.
G. Provide monitoring of approved estimate of Construction Costs and
identify variances between actual and budget costs.
H. Maintain cost accounting records.
I. Recommend changes, review change requests and prepare change orders
for approved changes.
J. Develop and implement procedures for review and processing of payments.
K.' Review and coordinate safety programs.
L. Assist in obtaining building permits, special permits and approvals
from appropriate authorities. Verify payment of applicable fees
and assessments.
M. Coordinate and obtain services of surveyors, special consultants
and testing laboratories.
N. Determine acceptability of work, guard against defects and deficiencies
in the work and require inspection of the work.
0. The Construction Manager will be responsible for construction means,
methods, techniques, sequences and procedures of Contractors.
P. Resolve questions of Contractors with Architect and Owner as to
interpretations of drawings and specifications.
r
Q. Receive and distribute Certificates of Insurance from Contractor.
R. Review drawings, data, samples and other submittals from Contractors
and coordinate them with related documents and expedite the processing
and approval of such submittals.
S. Record and submit written reports on the progress of the project.
Keep a daily log on weather, number of workers, work accomplished,
problems encountered. etc.
T. Maintain contracts, drawings, specifcations and all other pertinent
documentation at the Project site. Maintain records of principal
building layout lines, elevations of the bottom of footings, floor
levels and key site elevations.
U. Arrange for delivery and storage, protection and security for materials,
systems and equipment.
V. Observe the Contractors' checkout of utilities, operational systems
and equipment for initial start -up.
W. Prepare a list of incomplete or unsatisfactory items and a schedule
for their completion, assist in conducting inspections and coordinate
the correction and completion of the work.
X. Assist in determining substantial completion, prepare a summary
of the status of the work of each Contractor and recommend times
when uncompleted work is to be completed.
Y. Evaluate completion of the work and make recomendations when work
is ready for final inspection. Secure and transmit required guarantees,
affidavits, releases, bond and waivers and deliveries, keys, manuals,
record drawings and maintenance stocks.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND
SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the past and
can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger of fire, hazard, casualty
or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring outside the territorial limits
of the City of Edina and within the State of Minnesota; and by the suddenness thereof
it would be impossible or impractical for the City Council to meet and authorize
the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to combat such fire, hazard,
casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows:
The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City Manager
or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and in each
case the internal needs of the City of Edina and its inhabitants, to dispatch
City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to combat such occurrence
whether it takes place within or without the City limits.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the City
Manager or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City of Edina
and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equipment, liability
insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance and all other safeguards
and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment and personnel, shall apply in
each case as if specifically authorized and directed by this City Council at
such time, whether or not the governing body or authority of the place in which
the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence exists, has previously
requested and provided for assistance and the use of the Edina equipment and
personnel under a mutual protection agreement or other type protection agreement
with the City of Edina.
FURTHER, the City Manager or his designee shall recall, order and terminate
the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their use no longer
exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the best interest of
the City of Edina.
FURTHER, if the provisions of this.resolution shall ever conflict with the pro-
visions of the City's Civil Defense Ordinance, Ordinance No. 502, the provisions
of said ordinance shall control.
Adopted by the City Council on this of , 1985.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND
SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the past and
can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger of fire, hazard, casualty
or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring outside the territorial limits
of the City of Edina and within the State of Minnesota; and by the suddenness thereof
it would be impossible or impractical for the City Council to meet and authorize
the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to combat such fire, hazard,
casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows:
The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City Manager
or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and in each
case the internal needs of the City of Edina and its inhabitants, to dispatch
City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to combat such occurrence
whether it takes place within or without the City limits.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the City
Manager or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City of Edina
and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equipment, liability
insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance and all other safeguards
and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment and personnel, shall apply in
each case as-if specifically authorized and directed by this City Council at
such time, whether or not the governing body or authority of the place in which
the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence exists, has previously
requested and provided for assistance and the use of the Edina equipment and
personnel under a mutual protection agreement or other type protection agreement
with the City of Edina.
FURTHER, the City Manager or his designee shal -1 recall, order and terminate
the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their use no longer
exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the best interest of
the City of Edina.
FURTHER, if the provisions of this resolution shall ever conflict with the pro-
visions of the City's Civil Defense Ordinance, Ordinance No. 502, the provisions
of said ordinance shall control.
Adopted by the City Council on this of , 1985.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
4237C(4) :TSE:081585
� -A
ORDINANCE N0. 118
AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM
ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION
OF SKATE BOARD RAMPS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Purpose. Pursuant to applicable Minnesota statutes,
Edina is now conducting studies for the purpose of considering adoption
and /or amendment of official controls, including a zoning ordinance, an
accessory use ordinance and a nuisance ordinance. The ordinances or
amendments being studied will consider, and regulate and control, among
other things, the desirability of, and the size, location, number and
kind of, skate board ramps, installed or constructed, or to be installed
or constructed, in Edina. However, while the new ordinances and
amendments are being considered, proposals for, and applications for
permits to allow, construction and installation of new skate board ramps
continue to be made. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process
and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina, it is
necessary and desirable to impose the following moratorium.
Sec. 2. Moratorium. From the effective date of this ordinance
to and including the first anniversary of such effective date, subject to
earlier termination or extension by the Edina City Council, the Edina
City Council and the Edina City staff shall not:
(1) accept any applications for, or continue to process or
issue, any permits of any kind for any skate board ramps; or
(2) accept any applications for, or continue to process, any
variances from any existing City ordinances for the purpose
of installing or constructing any skate board ramps.
Sec. 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the Edina Sun on
ATTEST:
3
City Clerk
i19P5 Y OF EDINA
L�
CHECI .ISTER
08 -19- PAGE
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. P
A .O. A MESSAGE_
10- 4248- 560 -56
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504- 260 -26
24.95
737.50.:.
3365
F21 21
(18/14/85
0.00
24IRE
MCGU ROBERT
TREE INSPECTIONS
10 -4200- 353 -30
23100.4
3385
08/14/85
720000
MCGUIRE! ROBERT
TREE TRIM INSPECT.
60 -1300- 012 -18
GENERAL SLPPLIES
- -- -
_
231U04
08/08/85-
' 90-34
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
rff # #•
23101.8
231004
08/08/85
f•f -CKS
w
217026
08/08185
218.95
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 807 -80
08/08/85
217026
08/08/85
39600-
BAGGER METER INC
CREDIT
40- 4540 - 807 -80
REPAIR PARTS
217026
r,8 /08 /85
134.42 -
BAGGER METER INC ------REPAIR
PARTS --
40- 4540 - 807 -80
50 -4262- 821 -82
ASTLEFORO EQUIP
CO
43.03 -•
[18/C8/05
57.27
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 841 -84
+
231004
••• -CKS
48.89_
AMERICAN
LINEN
.1
�1
•
1
1
1
1
"1
0 4
I „
231CO3
08/13/85
737.50
ALBINSON
10- 4248- 560 -56
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10-4504- 260 -26
24.95
737.50.:.
I"
231013
-_ _�-
l 2 3100 7
U8/12/85
9, i
23100.4
08/08/85
157.69
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 440 -44
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
_
231U04
08/08/85-
' 90-34
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 6262 - 482 -48 ' ` -
23101.8
231004
08/08/85
164.06
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
10.4262- 520 -52
Od/13/85-
08/13/85
+
231U04
08/08/85
3806
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY_
10- 4262 - 520 -52
_..._._466.72
REPAIR PARTS
231Uj4
08/13/85 - - -J
- 438.24
'AMERICAN
LINEN - -' -
_-
- -r LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 821 -82
ASTLEFORO EQUIP
CO
231Ui.i4
[18/C8/05
57.27
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 841 -84
+
231004
08/08/85
48.89_
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 861.86
:~-
-- - - -- -
-- - -- --
506.67
- - - - - - -- -- - - - -
##r -CKS
231045
48/13/85 _ -
37925
AUDIO_GROUP
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -80
-
231005
18/13/85
37.25
AUDIO GROUP
ADVERTISING
50- 4214.862 -86
r
74.50 •
.1
�1
•
1
1
1
1
"1
0 4
I „
- CS /13/85 -�
24.95-
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
r #f -CKS
24.95
I"
231013
Qa /13/85
l 2 3100 7
U8/12/85
LL -22.00
APEX PEST CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
231E+13
08/13/85
22.30-*
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
231U13
08/13/85
91.20
ALTERNINTOI REBUILD
GENERAL_ SUPPLIES
10.4504- 646 -64
23101.8
08/13/85
221.97
KAMAN BEARING 6
SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
f...
2316C8
y - 231008
Od/13/85-
08/13/85
143.75 -
103.00
KAMAV BEARING B
KAMAN BEARING 8
SPLY - --
SPLY
REPAIR -PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560- 56 - -�- --
40 -4540- 801 -80
231013 _
51..76
_..._._466.72
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
�>
231013-
y
231009
08/08/85
851,358.30
ASTLEFORO EQUIP
CO
CAPITAL OUTLAY
10- 4900 - 300 -30
11090.5
ALTERNAiTDA•REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
859358.00 •
y
.I #f #frf
##r -CKS
.1
�1
•
1
1
1
1
"1
0 4
_r__._..
231L'12
- CS /13/85 -�
24.95-
AUTOMOBIIE�SERVICE C�
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
Y ^
24.95
I"
231013
Qa /13/85
ALTERNICTbkt REBUILD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 340- 30 - - -- `-
67:92
y -.
231E+13
08/13/85
43.68
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
231U13
08/13/85
91.20
ALTERNINTOI REBUILD
GENERAL_ SUPPLIES
10.4504- 646 -64
231013
08/13/85
116.94
AL TER NAiTOR REBUILD)
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54 -
b +�I
23103
Ob/13/85
39.42
ALTERNA,TC,A REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
54
231013 _
51..76
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
�>
231013-
_08/13/85
Q8/13/A5
83.22
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAiR.PARTS
10 =4540 =560- 56'�"- -
W
231013
08/13/85
11090.5
ALTERNAiTDA•REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
.1
�1
•
1
1
1
1
"1
0 4
19E5 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE
231L13 08/13/85
231013 08/13/95
231013 08/13185
-) rr *trr
231015 U8 /^9 /F5
,I
rf ++ ►f
231024
231025
231U26
231026
231026
231026
rr *r *•
231028
CHECK REGISTER
73G.65
08 -19 -85 PAGE 2
AMOUNT
VEND0.3
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV* / P.0* A MESSAGE
36.30
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 !'
28.70
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
PARTS_
10 -4620- 560 -56 -
67.92
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
_
PARTS - -- --
_
40 -4504- 801 -80
T41.11 •
42 *70
ALFOVS
'
CONTRACT SEW
i
27- 4200 - 661 -66
59639.70
42 *00 +
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
231028
* ** -CKS .T
4,716.0.5
08/08/85
36.34
BADGER
144.JO
AT 8 T. INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
144.70
155.54
BADGER
_ .._ ..
INC
REPAIR PARTS
,
40 -4540- 807 -80
28/78/85
231028
08/13/85
73G.65
BEER WNOL_SALERS
INVENTORY
27- 4630 - 664 -66
+ **-CKS
08 /071/8 5
12.45
ARTISTXT INC
INVENTORY
PRINTING
23- 4600- 610 -61
U6/7,8125
12.45
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
5,7- 4630- 842 -84
231U29
u6 /08185
08/13/85
42 *70
ALFOVS
AN)ERSSON
CONTRACT SEW
i
27- 4200 - 661 -66
59639.70
42 *00 +
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
231028
08/08/85
4,716.0.5
08/08/85
36.34
BADGER
METER
INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
`8/08/85
155.54
BADGER
METER
INC
REPAIR PARTS
,
40 -4540- 807 -80
28/78/85
13 *11
BADGER
METER
INC
_
REPAIR PARTS J
40- 4540- 807 -80
- o/97/8S
553.34
BADGER
METER
INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
758.33 +
231J33
03/14/85
* **-CKS
231028
08/13/85
73G.65
BEER WNOL_SALERS
INVENTORY
27- 4630 - 664 -66
231U28
08/14/85
1735.35
BEER WHOLE SALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
231U2P
U6/7,8125
_ 59659.70
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
5,7- 4630- 842 -84
231U29
u6 /08185
59639970----' -
- BEER WWOLESALERS _
_
CORRECTION
_
-- 50 -4630- 842 -84
231028
08/08/85
59639.70
BEER WHOLE SALERS
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
231028
08/08/85
4,716.0.5
BE ER_ WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
12841.45
231U29
C8/13/85
_ 128.70
- -
BERG 8 FARNHAM CO_
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30_
231029
08/13/85
260.00
BERG 6 FARNHAM CD
._ GENERAL SUPPLIES-
10- 4504 - 301 -30
231029
(18/14/85
10.70
BERG 8 FARNHAM CO
NO DISCOUNT
10 -4504- 646 -64
399.40 +
231J33
03/14/85
+�- 153.45'
6ERG --6RO TRUCKING
w INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82 -
231033
08/14/85
445.05
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 842 -84
231033
08114/85
29351.90 _
_ BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 862 -86
231U33
08/14/85
29351.90-
BERGFORO TRUCKING
-�
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 862 -86
231033
G8/14/R5
351.90
BER8FOR0 TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 862 -86
rrr + +*
r
231035
08/ ^8/85
-~ 326.40 i
BOUSTEAD ELEC 8 MFG
CONT REPAIRS
40 -4248- 801 -80
231035
0h /Q8 /85
193.0D
ROUST -RD ELEC 8 MFG
CONT REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
231U35 -
08/08/85 _
-"� _ 454.5D
_ BOUSTEA'D ELEC 8 MFG
CONT REPAIRS
43- 424E - 805 -80_
231035
08/08185
102.00 -
'BOUSTEAO'ELEC -CMFG -
REPAIR PARTS
_
40m4540- 801.80
1 9075.90
1 ,
1
J
J
* **-CKS ..J
J
J
* *• -CKS J
J
0 0
1985
Y OF EDINA
CHEC! PISTER
08 -19- PAGE 3
°1
-
^CHECK
NO* DATE _ — :—
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N09 INV.
Y
4 P.O. -N MESSAGE
-
(.
.• + + ++
** CKS
„I'I
231037
08/07/85
19605.60
BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
1 9605.60 +
231038
08/14/85
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERV
10- 4100 - 420 -42
100.00 .
231039
08/08/85
133.37
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
SAND GRAVEL ROCK
10- 4522 - 642 -64
"i
133.37 •
+ *r+►r
• +.-CKS ,.
231041
06/13/85
-- 97.65 y -
BURY "S CARLSON INC - -
BLACK TOP
10 -4524- 301 -30
.,
231U41
08/13/85
158.PO
BURY 8 CARLSON INC
BLACK TOF
40- 4524- 803 -80
256.45 •
••...CKS �
f'
I
231046
08/07/85 --
- - - 3.71- --
BLUMBERG P OTO --
CREDIT -� -
10 -4248- 627 -62-
_
qw
231046
Ob/',17/85
23.70
BLUMBERG PHOTO
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 627 -62
231046
043/07/85
12.00
BLUMBERG PHOTO
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 627 -62
31 999 -�
- - -- - - -- —
rr +. *•
••• -CKS
W,
231053
08/08/85
130.68
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTIN
10 -4250- 301 -30
231U53
08/08/85
43.56
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
10 -4250- 446 -44
231053
08/08/85 - -
-^ 55.42
BROWNING"FERRIS --
REFUSE _ COLLECTIN
10- 4250 - 520 -52
- -
�j I
231053
Q8/08/85
130.68
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTIN
10- 4250 - 540 -54
231U53
08/08/85
43.56
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTIN
4250- 646 -64
231653
08/ ^8/85
141.18
-------
BROWNING FERRIS _REFUSE
_
CCLLECTIN
_10-
10 -4250- 646 -64
wi
231053
68/08/85
60.00
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSt COLLECTION
20- 4250- 628 -62
231053
08 /0d /85
10088
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTIN
23- 4250 - 610 -66
231053
_
08/98/85
- - 114.12-
BROWNING FERRIS --
REFUSE COLLECTIN
26 -4250- 689 -68
-- -
231053
08/00/85
220.99
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTIN
27- 4250 - 661 -66
ti
231053
08/08/85
1993
BROWNING.FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
27 -4250- 661 -66
231L53
Ob/08/85 -
_
�. 1.93- ____--
_
BROWNING_FERRIS~
_
CORRECTICN
-27- 4250 - 661 -66
231LI53
C8/C8/85
50.01
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTIN
27 -4250- 662 -66
4
^i 231053
-- Ob /0E/85 �^
50.30
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE COLLECTION
28 -4250- 708 -70
231053
08 /0B /85
187:77
BROWNING FERRIS 'REFUSE
COLLECTION
50- 4250 - 841- 84 " - -
" -- -
��
231053
08/0&/85
399.93
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE CCLLECTIN
50- 4250 - 861 -86
-�
- 1,639.05 •
_ _ _ _
231054
Ob/13/85
46.50
BATTERY UAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
231054
- Go/13/85
32.53
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
RF_PAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
08/13185
79.50
BATTERY--QAREHOUSE
REPAIR- PARTS
-10- 4540 - 560 -56 -
-
��231054
231054
08/13/85
17.63
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
231054
08/13/85
-
83.16
BATTERY WAREHOUSE_
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
I'I
231054
06/13/85
152.50•
BATTERY- WAREHOUSE -
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 _
..._
412.12 +
i
_. - - -- -- - -__..
-- .__. ** -CKS
�_.
23105b
Q8/14/85
100000,
WAYNE.BENNETT
POLICE_SERV -_
10 -4100- 420.42
0 0
1965 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
_ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0.__INV.
#__P _A _MESSAGE -__-
1
**• -CKS
_
08/')8/85
340.90
AMBASSb00R SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
26 -4624- 664 -66 -
_23106^.
_231060
231060
_
08/03/85
_ _
34 ^.90-
_
AWBASSA00R SAUSAGE _ T'CORRECTICN
'
26- 4624- 664 -66
08/08/85
71.50
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624- 684 -68
231L60
08/08/85
340.90
AmBASS3;DOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS _ _ _
27 -4624- 664 -66
j
231L'6U
Ob /13/85
90.61
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
231060
08/08/85
1717.50
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
231060
08/ ^8185
71.50-
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CORRECTION ._
_ 27- 4624- 684 -68
231060
08/08/85
71.50
_
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 684 -68
_I.
673.51 •
•R* -CKS
231U62
08/13/85
620.00
BROCK YHIT=
GENERAL_ SUPPLIES
--
10- 4504 - 343 -30
231062
G8 /08/85 - - --
- - -- 42.25 - - --
BROCK YHITE� - - - - -^
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 322 -30
-
662.25
`'
iff if f
_..
_•
_ - _
__ - _
*** -CKS
1I
251064
C8/ ^8/85
23.80
THERMAL_ CO -
REPAIR PARTAS_ T
10- 4540 - 520 -52
- - - -- -.
_
231064
^231064
08 /fl8 /8`.
_ ._-
13.15
_
THERMAL CO
REPAIR PARTS
10-454052052 - -
018 /0185 /85
128.48
THERMAL CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
231064
0.8/GB/85
29640
- THERMAL_ CO
REPAIR_ PARTS
29 -4540- 721 -72
194.P3 •
231065
018/13185
20.30
,CULLIGA;N _ -
CONTRACT SERV
10 -4200- 482 -48
_
20.30 *
R** -CKS
-t
231076
06/12/85
69.00
CARl50N THERMO
REtaAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80
69.00
* */-CKS
231U72
08/12/85
126.48
DAILY CONST REPORTS
ADVERTISING -`
-� 10- 4210 - 140 -14
126.48
'
- --
231073 -
- u8 /OT /8`. -T
-- 70.70
CITY BEER"
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 822 -82
231075
08/08/85
17.65
CITY BEER
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 842 -84
✓!''
231073
58/OA/85
142.00
CITY -e_ER
INVENTORY -_
_ 50 -4630- 862 -86
r1
237.35
JI
"1
08/08/95
39.00
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON__.,
CONFERENCES___ ___,
10- 4206- 440 -44
_231074
231074
06 /!18/85
___253 .00
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
KENNEL SERV
10- 4278 - 470 -47
.289.00 •
231C75
78/14/85
4.00
CLANCY DRUG INC
GENERAL SIFPLIES
10 -4504- 260 -26
'=
231075
U8 /14/85
2.55
CLANCY DRUG INC
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 421 -42
5•
6.55 •
--"r-- - - - -
••* -CKS
7
A
1985
Y OF EDINA
CHECF ISTER
08 -19- PAGE 5
CHECK
N0. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
N P.O. 4 MESSAGE
231078
08/14/85
506.35
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
I'
231078
08/14/85
_ _ _
828.40
COCA COLA BOTTLING
- -�
INVENTORYy
50- 4632 - 842 -84
231078
08/14/85
1, ^.9 ^.55
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
I
29425.30 +
�I
•ttrfa
+ ++ -CKS
2310 °U
08/13/85
469.38
CONT -MTNN -
GENERAL SUPPLIES
-'27 -4504- 661 -66
231080
;8/13/85
3,436.75
CONT -MINN
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
3,906.13
+aafaa
*•+ -CKS
231082
U8/07 -/85
- - -- 37.25-
CONWAY FILE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAIAT
10 -4274- 420 -42
'
-
n
37.25 +
•�
rraa►a
-- -- --
-- --
- -. .- - .. - ••*-CKS
— - -- -
-- - - - -
n!
231087
U8/08185
30.63
CURTIN MATH SCI
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 482.48
•-•
231087
U8/08/85 -
--- - -_ - -- 17.12 _ _
CURTIN MATH SCI -- --
-+ GEN SUPP ----
4i10 -4504- 482 -48
231L'87
U8/08/85
385.75
CURTIN MATH SCI
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 482 -48
41
2310PI
08/08/85
213.70
CURTIN MATH SCI
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 482 -48
.. - - •• -�- - -- —• -- - — .._
—.___T __
IT .!
i-
rff4af
-
-
- - - - ..
- ._ _- --- -- ._ -- ---
� - -- --
raa -CKS
231090
08/98/85
374.86
CERT DOdER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
23109C
C8 /08/85
12.55
CERT POWER TRAIN
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
231090
08/08185
_
137.44
CERT _ POYE4 TRAIN --
_REP.AIR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_
23109n
U8/08185
38.71
CERT POYER.TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
613.56
a•f • • •
,
++f -CKS
-
231094
08/13/85 -
— ^ 7.93
CASH REIGISTER SALES
GENERAL— SUPPLY
27- 4504 - 661 -66
'
7.93 •
231095
08/14/85
90.78
COMMISSIONER REVENUE
__ GASOLINE,_ " -
10- 4612 - 560 -56
+•+ -CKS
I_
231097
08/12/85 -
-_- — 44.53 -J�
COURTNEtY C VAYNE
MILEAGE
10- 4208- 100 -10
231097
J8/12/85
44.53 -
COURTNEY C 61ATNE
_
MILEAGE �
10 -4208- 100 -10
231U97
U8/12/85
44.53
COURTNEIY .- WAYNE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 100 -10
^_
_231097
08/12/85
44.53
C OUR TNnY C 4AYNE
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 100 -10
=�
2 31097
05/12/85
44.53=
COURfNEtY'C YAYNE
ROAD OIl
10 -4208- 100 -10
44.53
***-CKS
231106
0,8 /14/85
100.00
DAHL- MR HILDING
POLICE SERV
10 -4100- 420 -42
•rf -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 6
3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT — -, -
- -- VENDOR _ _
_ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. p MESSAGE
231108
08 /08/85
32'9.70
DALE GREEN COMPANY
SOD BLACK DIRT
10-4562- 353 -30
-
'I
320.30
_._.._ --..
.
. -
tfflf#
+r+ -CKS'
23111f 08/14/85
9109
OAVIDSEN DIST INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
`
2311 Ir
08 /08185
667.95
DAVIDSEN GIST INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
756.95
.._
'�
•fart•
-
• **-" KS
'
231114
08/13/85
14.39
DELEGARD TOOL CO
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 301 -30
`
231114
08/13/85
38.19
OELEGARD TOOL CO_
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
'
52.58 •
- _ -
-
".I
aa►ria
*.**-CKS
231125
03/13/85
138.9n-
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 560 -56
`
'
231125
.08/13/85
138.80
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 560 -56
231125
08/13/85
138.90
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 560 -56
231125
1:3/14/85
187.60
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 540 -54
231125
^6/14/85
- - — 316.75
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 628 -62
231125
CB /13/85
155.40 _
— MERIT SUPPLY '- -- " - -
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
- _
231125
06/14/85
180.60
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
26 -4512- 689 -68
231125
Ob/13/85
69.70
MERIT SUPPLY
GNEERAL SUPPLY
27 -4504- 661 -66
231125
06/14/95
45P.35
MERIT SUPPLY
_ _
CLEANING SUPPLIES -
28- 4512 - 708 -70
°
231125
fib /14/85
451.50
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28.4512- 708 -70
1,950.30 •
'.
231126
08/14/85
50400
DAVIS_ EUGENE
LABOR
60 -4100- 985 -90
231126
08/14/85
27.14
DAVI.S •. EUSE_NE _.-
MILEAGE
60 -4208- 985 -90
531.14 +
_ -�Y
-
rfrrrr
-
._.....-- - -- ---
•-------- - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -
-• -- ---- - -__,-
rrr -CKS
231134
08/08/85
36.75
CITYWIDE SERVICES
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
36.75 •
•ffrff
• ++ -CKS
?;
231136
06/13/85
974.68
—EARL F- ANDERSEN
CONSTRUCTION- -10
-1422- 000 -00
231136
^8112185
415.'10
EARL F ANDERSEN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231136
CB/13/85
139.92
EARL -F. ANDERSEN
PAINT
10 -4544- 335 -30
1,529..3.0 •
_
.
rrr +ir
CKS
231143
08/13185
16903
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
231143
08/13/85
_ Y 146.66
_�- EMRI-CH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
314.69 a
_ _
._ - - --
�
fiaffi
-
'I'�
231148
08/13/'8'.
23.54
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 560 -56
`
'1965 f OF EDINA
I
CHECK NO. DATE
231149 Od/12/85
_-
i >� 231150 -- " - Ois/08/85''
23115G 08/08/85
CHECK ISTER 108 -19- 1AGE 7
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE
23.54 *
- 400.20 l ESEBERG GOLF CARTS EQUIP RENTAL - - 27- 4226- 660 -66
400.00 *
- -30 *15 -------ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS _40 -4540- 804 -80
13 *36 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 804 -80
43.51 •
*f* -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* **-CKS
*** -CKS
**f -CKS
i#fifa
231153
08/13/85
- - - _15.63 -
ENGINE PARTS - SUPPLY -
- -- - GENERAL SUPPLY_—
10- 4504560 -56 - -
j j
15.63 •
�•�
231154
08/08'/85
498.80
JOE ELIAS
SALARY
27 -4100- 663 -66
"�
498.80 *
iaf rff
231157
U8/13/85
5,050.30
50TH- FRANC- BUS ASSN
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10- 4200 - 395 -30
F +�
r"t
ftfrff
231159
08/12/85
102.33
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 810 -80
i
102.33
#f r•f f
231162
06/13/85
143.62 �-
FOYL_R ELECTRIC --
- �tEPAIR PARTS" -
^10 --4540- 560 -56 - -
143.62
i
231164
78 /UY3 /P5
41.30
FREEWAY DODGE INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
i'
231164
_
Jd/08/85
_
- 18 *00 _
- FREEWAYDODGE INC --
REPAIR PARTS - -
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231164
08/08/85
15.08
FREEWAY DODGE INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
231164
08/13/85
11.71 -
FREEWAY DODGE INC
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
231164
06/13185
_
11.71 _
FREEWAY DODGE INC
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
231164
08/13/85
111.71
FREEWAY DODGE INC
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
186.09 #
LI•.
rrrrr•
231188
08/08/85
- 15.90
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
-- REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 322 -30
231188
08/98/85
36.30
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 646-64
I•r;
231188
u6/t?8185
306.10
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 662 -66
231188
08/14/85 -' - --
-- 709.00
— GRAYBAR-"ELECTRIC CO
" CONSTRUCTION
28 -1300- 000-00
231188
Ud/141F5
5*623.24
GRAYBAR'ELECTRIC CO
CONSTRUCTION
28- 1300 - 000 -00
231188
08/08/85
5.92
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR PARTS
- 40 -4540- 811 -80
-
69696.86
231194
08/13/85
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
1910.0
GENERAL- COMMUNICATNS
*f* -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* **-CKS
*** -CKS
**f -CKS
1985
Y OF EDINA
CHECK _dISTER
08 -19 -a. PAGE 8
CHECK
N0. DATE_
- .!AMOUNT -
_ VENDOR _
ITEM_DESC_RIFTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. 4 MESSAG_
231194
08/08185
100.70
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10 -4294- 420 -42
231194
Ob/14/85
17.40
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERVICE
10- 4294 - 440 -44
231194
u8/C03185
377.50
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10- 4294 - 440 -44
!
231104
U8 /1,7/E5
83.50
GENERAL C7MMUNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10 -4294- 440 -44
.231194
08/13/85
- 266.25
GENERAL_COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERVICE
10- 4294 - 560 -56
_ ;'
863.65 +
231195
(28/13/85
50.65
GOLF CTR MIDWEST
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 671 -66
50.65 •
_ _ _____
-___
-
• f r • • f
-
-- -
-
*•• -CKS
_i
231ZJ6
')8/14/85
355.39
G B K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 301 -30
231 20 6
JB /14/E5
235.23
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 560 -56
`
2312J6
;8/14/25
385.36
G & K SERVICES
_
LAUNDRY -
10- 4262- 646 -64
231206
J8/14/85
206.60
G 8 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 801 -80
11,183.08
+ ++ -CKS
2312:9
^8/13/25
1.73 -
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS-
� 10 -4540- 560 -56
2312.)9
0.8/13/85
19.66
SENUENE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231219
u6/13/85
-- -_ -_._.- - 10.01
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231 209
Q8/13/85
9.16
_
GENUINE PARTS '
_
REPAIR PARTS ''
_
10 -4540- 560 -56
2312:x9
U8/13/85
15.49
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
23129
G8/13/85
30.10
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_
2312J9
08/13/85
26.19
GENUIF #E PARTS -
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2312U9
08/13/85
25.24
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
/ 10- 4540 - 560 -56
231209
Ub /13/25
_ - _ 14.58 _
-
__GENUINE_PARTS_
REPA_IR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
_
1312J9
118/13/85
75.42
_
GENUINE PARTS
PRTS - -
10- 4620 - 560 -56
i
227.58 •
i•••f1,•
... . --
-- _......�..� -_.. .___. - -- -
- _ __ ...._ _.._. ._...
.__
••• -CKS
231 21 8
U8 /C8/85
�.. 202.60
HALLMAN
LUBRICANTS
27- 4618- 662 -66
202.6(2 +
�-
- - -- -. -- --
f f f f• f
. __ -- -- -- - - - •-- -__
_. _ ....... - _
_ _
_
+•• -CKS
•I
231220
08/12/85
59.60
HAIR NED LUMBER CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
59.60 +
•• •f • f
+ ++ -CKS
1,
231228
Ob /13 /E5
_ 11,384.28
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y _
REPAIR PARTS -
10- 4540 - 560 -56
j
231228
08/13/85
19 ?89.?3
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
_
- - 231228
08/08/85
-_ 5 ^..25
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
_
1
2t724. 36
-. -_ - _ -
- - - -- - - - - --
-
' -
f f r• f f
_. -- -
-_.
11
231234
06IC7185
6.95
HOOT =N CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 420 -42
231234
C8/07/85
- -
185.60
HOOTEN CL_ANERS
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
- Itz
192.5 5
-
f•f -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 9
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR-
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
rl'I
231238
08/13/85
24.00
UM H MCCOY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 301 -30
24.70 •
frtttr
taf -CKS
231244
08/13/85
100000
HAYDEN MURPHY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 343 -30
231245
ci8/08/a5
35.40
RO8T1T 8 HILL
SALT
10 -4538- 440 -44
231245
06 /08/85
42.80
ROBERT 8 HILL
SEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
_ 76.20 •
a.:
tf f ►f f
f tf -CKS
231248
Uti/13/85
76.36
HARMON GLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
i
231248
08/13/85
76.53
HARMON GLASS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
- 152.89 •
-- - -- _ ... _ _ .. -- -
- - -- - -. - --
-- - -
231249
Q8/14/85
10 ^000
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
POLICE SERV
10- 4100- 420 -42
100.00 f
tw
-
'•
fftff•
• +• -CKS
2S1253
18/13/85
98.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
98.50 +
b
ftftrt
+•• -CKS
231277
D8/12/P5
233.25 -_ —
CARLSON PRINTING - -
OFFICE SUPPLIES
r- 10 -4504- 646 -64
ti
231277
08/12/85
233.25
CARLSON FRPNTING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 620 -62
231277
68/12/85
233.25
CARLSDN FpI'NTING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 620 -62
231277
Cb/12/85
233.25-
CARLSON PRINTING
_
OFFICE SUPPLIES
_
10- 4516 - 646 -64
r
231277
Ua /12185
233.25
CARLSON PRINTING
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 646 -64
\
233.25 +
y
231278
08/C8/85
33.77
JERRYS FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
26 -4504- 684 -68
1312/8
U8 /Q8 /85
16.79
JERRYS FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
26 -4504- 688 -68
50.56 •
- ___. -. _.
_ .
. _
t f f f ► •
*► *-CKS
-y
yi+
231283
0.8/08/85
60000
JONE4 CMEMICALS INC
WATER
26 -4564- 689 -68!
600..00 •
y lad
frffr•
ftf —CKS \
231289
08/14/85
— 10 0.00
WAITER JOHNSON - 'POLICE
SERV -
10- 4100- 420 -42
d i
100.00 •
rffftr
•ff —CKS
231292
08/14/85
427.00_
HA RRI :S MOMEYER CJ
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
— - -
- -- --
---
427,3D
_ —_
fff -CKS
••
1
1985
C OF EDINA
CHECK
.IS TER
08 -19 -L PAGE 10
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
11 P.O. M MESSAGE
2313U2
08/14/85
49130904
KUETHER DIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
231302
08/78/85
5,907.70
KUETHER DIST CC
. -_ - _.• -__
INVENTORY
_.,
50- 4630- 842 -84
10,038.64
*► * * **
-
- *** -CKS
231334
O8 /C8 /P5
8.02
KNOB LUMBER CO
REPAIR. PARTS_
10- 4540 - 540 -54
231304
08/08/85
67.49
KNOB LUMBER CO
LUMBSER
10 -4604- 646 -64
2313.i4
08113/85
6.79
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
231324
0.6/08185
KNOK LUMB -rR CO
LUMBSER
10 -4604- 646 -64
2313.:4
08/13/P5
__153.13 _
9945
_ _
KNOK LUM9r-R CO
_
_ PARTS
_
27- 4620- 662 -66
2313u4
08/14/85
26.72
KNOK LUMBER CO
PARTS
27- 4620 - 662 -66
2313:14
US/14/85
76.42
KNOK LUMB --R CO
REPAIR PARTS
28 -4540- 708 -70
341.92 *
- - -
- - -. -• -.
* ** -CKS
231307
08/08/85
59776945
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10 -4526- 301 -30
2313,; 7
08 /RB /85
6,723.71
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10- 4526- 301 -30
231 3: 7
06/r8/P5
5,761.12
KOCH ASPHALT
RCAO OIL
10- 4526- 314 -30
2313:.7
08/12/85
59513.75
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10- 4526- 314 -30
231307
08/14/85
5,734.54
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10- 4526- 314 -30
- 231377
08/12/85
59703.88 -
- _.KOCH ASPHALT --
ROAD OIL " - _ --
10- 4526- 314 -30
2313,7
Gd/12/85
5,703.88
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10- 4526- 314 -30
231 3J7
08/13/85
69058.58-
KOCH ASPHALT
CREDIT PD TWICE
13- 4526- 314 -30
2313:7
US/12/85
59513.75-
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL -
- — 10- 4526- 314 -30
2313.;7
08/12/85
59703.88-
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10- 4526- 314 -30
2313'7
CS /12/85
59513.75_
KOCH ASPHALT
ROAD OIL
10 -4526- 314 -30
299154.17
-- -
-- --
• *r *rr
•** -CKS
[51311
08/13/85
180.00
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
27- 4630- 664 -66
231311
08 /C7 185
39165.80
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
5!1- 4630 - 822 -82
231311
L6 /Cl2 /85
39985.00 " ^'~
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
_
INVENTORY— -
50- 4630- 842 -84
231311
08/07 -/85
89949.10
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
16,279.90 •
* *• + *•
•** -CKS
1511
231317
08 /0H /85
T 186.80
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 322 -30
231317
U8 /r8/85
110.37
LAWSON PR09UCTS
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 322 -30
231 31 7
08/09/85
277.27
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPP
231317
^8/13/85
_
555.16
_
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
1C- 4620 - 560 -56
231317
08/08/85
33106
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
1,460.76 •
_
231 31 8
u8/1-eI85
102.75
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
231314
Qd /13/85
_ 12.00
-. -__ _•,
IEEE ,EROS INC
GENERAL
23 -4504- 611 -61
251318
06/08/85
23.35
-,
LEEF BROS INC
_ -_ _ _
LAUNDRY
_
27- 4262 - 662 -66
138.10 •
a7
231319T
--' C8/0@/85
1211.00
LEITNER CDMPANT-
SANG- 6RAYEL ROCK
14522- 662 -66--_
0
—_I - •
- sa
231319
L'8/01/85
19211.00 --
LEITNLR COMPANY
CORRECTION
10- 4522 - 662 -66
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 11
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDO;
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV*
0 P.O. 9 MESSAGE
231319
US /ES /85
1,211.00
LEITNER COMPANY
SAND GRAVEL ROCK
27- 4522 - 662 -66
'
10211.00
•
.,
*rrrrr
r** -CKS
231325
08/13/85
292.37
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS . --
10 -4540- 560 -56
j
292.37
•
rrrrrr
* ** —CKS
231329
0-8/r•7/85
8,857.70
LANNE MINNESOTA CO
CONT REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
89857.00
• - _.
- — - - - -- - -
- - -- - - .
* **—CKS
231336
36/13/85
63.95
LANCE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
63.95
r.
231337
08/13/85
25.52
LAKE STATE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
231337
08/13/85
33.56
LAKE STAT= EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
I
59.39
r
_. _.__.
.
r *err*
r **-CKS
yl'
231339
C'8/08/85
40.78
LAKELAND ENS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
I'
251339
08/08/85
65970
LAKELAND :NG
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
105.78
r
—__
rrr*r*
* **-CKS
231344
08/'17/85
17.36
M =0 OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 449 -44
231344
G8/C8/85
22.18
MED OXNGE4 B EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440 -44
i
39.54
_ _
r *rr *r
*** —CKS
�.,
231346
0.8/08/85
21,037.50
MET N WASTE C L COMM
BLDG PERMITS
10 -3095- 000 -OC
21,037.50
+
**+-CKS
231350 -
OS /Qp /85
- —21 .00
-____ MILLE0 DAVIS CO ---- •- - -Y-
6EN $UPPLJIES
! 10 -4504- 200 -20 -
�,
i
21.00
+
rrrt *•
_.. .._.._.... --
-- - ----..._.. .— ._..__..r---._..
*** -CKS
231353
C8/13/A5
75.29
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
231353
_
06/13/85 '
' — - 65.55
_ _ _
—! MINNESOTA GLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
-
231353
08/13/85
21.42
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 560 -56
�+
231353
08/13/85
57.60
MINNESOTA GLOVE
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610 - 560 -56
219.77
-
_
y
n
rr*rrr
* ** -CKS
y
ne
231355
06/13/85
65.40
- MINNS0TA SEARING CO
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
r�
f.._ CKS
1985
Y OF EDINA
CHECK JISTER
08 -19 -,_ PAGE 12
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENOOi
ITEM DESCRIPTION_
ACCOUNT NOf INV.
9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
_._ _
I,.
65.40
•
•••-CKS
231358
08/14/85
3M ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV
50- 43C4- 841 -84
_ _ _193.94
193.94
• -- - - -_..
- - -- --
I'
231359
08108/95
41.60
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR :PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2 31359
0
08/8/85
23.75
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS— y
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231354
C8/f:18185
4.14
MINN TORO TNC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231359
08/:.'.8/95
188.33
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231359
(16/14/85
30.73
_ _ _
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
231359
Ub /0E /P5
31.02
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
231359
08 /CB /85
14.33
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 662 -66
231359
US/12/85
13.41
_
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS -
_
- 27- 4540 - 662 -66
231359
08/12/85
51.76
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
397.37
231360
08/12/85
47.10
MTNNES'OTA WANNER
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4504- 646 -64
231360
08/12/85
50.00
MINNESOTA WANNER
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
231360
08/12/85
16. ^0
MINNESOTA WANNER
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
113.10
+
fff -CKS
i
231362
08/13/85
824.60
MODEL STOVE COMPANY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 365 -30
231362
09/13/85
628.88
MODEL STONE COMPANY
_
CONCRETE -
_
10- 4528- 301 -30
231362
U8/13/85
628.50
MODEL STOWS COMPANY
CONCRETE
40- 45228- 803 -80
2,081.98
•
• +* -CKS
231365
08/14/85
103.00
- BERT MERFELD
POLICE SERV -
4 10- 4100- 420 -42
100.00
+
231366
L8/0 -A/85 -
- 27.70
-- -- MINNESOTA BAR---- - - - - -- -PAPER
'SUPPLY
-
231366
78/07185
446.88
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
231366
78 /r9 /85
518.40
_ _ MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
231366
08/071/85
394.27
MINNESOTA BAR -
INVENTORY -
50 -4632- 862 -86
19386.55
+
••+ -CKS
231379
08/14/85
5,943.35
_ _ MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
't
231319
UWR /85
79653.96
_
MARK V11 SALES INC
_
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
I'I
2313/8
ub/07/85
119153.63
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
249750.91
231379
08/13/85
35.40
METRO FON= COMM
EQUIP RENTAL
10 -4226- 301 -30
".
35.40
f `
2313811
0.8/14/85
99439.87
THOMSEN NYBECK
SERVICES
10- 4100 - 220 -22
9,439.87
+
f.._ CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR —
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO- INV.
# P.O. 0 MESSAGE
~I•
2314'10
08/13/85
1,008.95
NORTRWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES B TUBES
10 -4616- 560 -56
1,008.95
•
-- - _
_
L
--
f
r.rrrr
f r.. CKS
I
231 4J 6
G6 /CS /85
5.70
NTCC NW REGION
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
2314J.6
08/78/85
49.35
NTCC NJ REGION
REPAIR PARTAS
50- 4540 - 861 -86
46.65
rrrrrr
_
_
^ '
rrr••CKS
231412
08/13/85
14.49
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENTORY SUPPLY
23 -1209- 000 -00
14.49
•
■.rrrr
rrr —CKS
- 231417
08/08185
327.60
OFFS =T PRINTING
PRINTING -- T -_ -
10 -4600- 420 -42
.,
327.60
^_6/13/85
23142
136.55
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
136.55
-� -- -.. - - -- -- -
231421
118/14/85
95.48
OLSON CRAIN 6 CABLE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
ar '
95.48
-
rrrrrr
►rr -CKS
231427
06/14/85
199.00
PARTS SUPPLY COT
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
199.00
v
rrrr *.
rrr -CKS
231 4z
Oh/13185
1,250.30
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING -
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
231429
Q8/OA/85
30300.
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
f..
231429
231419
08/718/85
18/071/85
429.35
632.80
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
_ 50- 4632- 842 -84
50- 4632 - 862 -86
2016.25
'---
- --
rrrrrr
- --- - ---
---- -___.__.______
---_ .-- -_.._�- .�...--- -•-- -- -- -_--
.___ --
_..- ----- ._.._._ , -.
rrr-CKS
-I
231434
08/08/85
61.60
PRINTERS SERVICE INC
EQUIP MAINT
28 -4274- 707 -70
61.60
* -
�;
rrrra•
rrr -CKS
Phil
231443
08/07/85
364.]0
POMMER MFS CO
TENNIS SUPPLY
10 -6586- 623 -62
36400
rrrrrr
rrr -CKS
n l
231446 -
-- 08/13/85 -• -
-�`- •--- 269.76
PIONEER RIM 8 YHEEL -' --
-PARTS
•10 -1620- 560 -56-
+r
°.I
269.76
W,
1
1985
r OF EDINA
CHECK ISTER
08 -19 -, 'AGE 14
.I
CHECK
T
NO* DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
11_P.O. N MESSAGE
�,
fii +.•
**+ -CKS
I
23145e
08/13/85
23.40
QUICK SSPV EATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231452
06/13/85
45.60
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
f
231452
06/13/85
— 45.60
_
— QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
_
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231452
Q8/13185
78.72
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_
231452
Q6/13/F5
11.40
QUICK_ SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS_. ___ _.
—.• 10 -4540- 560 -56
i
204.72
�i,..l
*r *ia•
+ +*-CKS
'i
231455
08/13/855
22984
RITEWAY
REPAIR 'PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
22.84
•
,
i•t•••
* ** -CKS
23146U
08/14/85
- 366.20
_ ROYAL CROWN BEV -
INVENTORY ____—
50- 4632- 822 -82
231460
08/08/E5
144 *80
ROYAL CROWN BEY
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
2314611
08/08/85
561 *90
_ ROYAL CROWN B =V
INVENTORY -
- 50 -4632- 862 -86
I
1 9072.90
+
--
-. .
I >•�
f *ir•i
frr -CKS
23146e
06/13/85
89.00
RENTAL EdUIP 8 SALES
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 353 -30
89.]0
+
231463
08/14185
1772.40
REX DIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
231463
C8 /14/85
5.499.90
REX DIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
231463
08/14/85
49231 *35
_
— REX DIST —
INVENTORY �
- 50.4630- 862 -86
-
11.503.65
f•f•r•
_ _
-__.. -_ -__-
***-CKS
231470
06/14/85
25.00
OR ROCKWELL
MEDICAL SERV
10 -4100- 481 -48
- 25.00
i
- -- —
- -
ff * * **
*r* -CKS
231485
L8106/85
29635.73
STATE BLDG INSP
BLDG PERMITS
10- 3095- 000 -00
231485
U8 /C8 /85
._ 130.50
STATE BLDG INSP
SUR CHG TAX
10 -3113- 000 -00
I; I
29766.23
:'� ----- -- --- -
- - - _. -- - - ----
- - - - - -
- -
*•ff **
*+* -CKS ,
231490
U8/0d./85
16.14
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
REPAIR PARTAS
10 -4540- 322 -30
___23149C
U8 /C8/85
43.20
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
-* - - -- -- - -- -- ---- --
GEN SUPPLIES - -- - -
— - -- -- - -- — .
-- 40- 4504 - 805 -80
59.34
l t l
♦ i *• f•
*** —CKS
I�I
231492
16/12185
128 *00
SOUTHDA;LE FORD
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
=I
231492
U8/08185
326 *20
SOUTHDACLE FORD
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
n�
231492
08/08/85 —'�
5.22
SOUTHDALE FORD '—
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
_
'
231492
09/08/85
9t *42
SOUTHDXLE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
139249.15
56.00 SOUTHT011N REEFRIG E9UIP MAIhT 27- 4274 - 661 -66
56.00 • _ _ _,__ __ ._. .
19F5 CITY
OF !:DINA
REGISTER
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
08 -19 -85 PAGE
AMOUNT
_ CHECK NO.
DATE
('
231492
J8 /118/85
5.22
231492
U8/08/85
231502
231492
U9 /1'8/85
8*60
231492
- .8/08/85
Ir� -
- -- 231495
U8 /C7 /85
36.62
231493
U8/ ^8/85
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231493
u8/ ^7-/85
8979
SOUTHDA;LE
FORD
i
231495
Ub/13/85
139249.15
56.00 SOUTHT011N REEFRIG E9UIP MAIhT 27- 4274 - 661 -66
56.00 • _ _ _,__ __ ._. .
231502
CHECK
REGISTER
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
08 -19 -85 PAGE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
2315;
1985 Y OF EDINA CHE01 jISTER 08 -19- PAGE 16
CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P *0. # MESSAGE
'
*** -CKS
• **-CKS
• ** -CKS
• ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
+ ** -CKS
• ** -CKS
c
t
*►9999 * ** —CKS
�^ 231551 48/14/85 361 .06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 420 -42
66.12
r
�•
frrtr•
I
231516
US/08/F5
24.33
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
231516
.:,8/03/85 -- --
-_ - -- 9T.46^
SEARS ROEBUCK -
- TOOLS --�— _
—'10- 4580 - 301 -30
231516
U8/08/85
24.30
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
231516
08/13/85
175.41
SEARS_ROEBUCK
TOOLS
-4580- 801 -80
321 .50
+
___40
•i
R *Rr *•
231524
Ud /08/85
358.45
TURNOUIST PAPER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
358.45.*
*•rfrR
- 231527
OS/�18/85 _
41.10
~_
_TAYLOR SALES'
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624 - 684 -68
h
41.10
231530
O8/13/85
. 318 *00
TEXGAS CORP
GENERAL
10- 4504 - 301 -30
I
T-
318.00:
__ --- - -- --- -- - _._.__.
_ ._.
�..__
231537
U8113/85
474.00
TRI ST4;TE DRILLING
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80
231537
08/13/85
474 *30
TRI STATE DRILLING
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80
231537
U6/13/85
688.00
_
TRI STATE DRILLING
REPAIR PARTS
l40- 4540 - 805 -80
19636.00
23.1.5.39
).8/14/85
282900
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
&_BLACK DIRT
27- 4562- 662 -66
-` -
282.30
_
I
r f f • • r
231542
08/07/85
159037.41
THORPE DIST
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862-86
'��._.
_- - -- . - • _
_ _ _ .
_ -_ 15 9037.41
• �__
_ _ __._ - ---
_ _ _ -- . - - - - -_ __ -_�
— - . -__ _._ --
+rR +rr
231545
08/13/85
41.35
_
TMIN CTY GARAGE DOOR
REPAIR PARTS '--10-4540-540-54
I,I
41.35
+
231548
J8/14/85 _
_, _- 177.75
__CITY.
., _ -
_ ADVER7ISIN6..__-
�23- 4214 - 610 -61
177.75
•
*** -CKS
• **-CKS
• ** -CKS
• ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
+ ** -CKS
• ** -CKS
c
t
*►9999 * ** —CKS
�^ 231551 48/14/85 361 .06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 420 -42
1
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
08 -19 -85
PAGE 17
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT _ _
- VENDOR
- _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. 4 P.O. ft
MESSAGE
�!
231551
08/14/85
920.15
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOW
10 -4266- 421 -42
+i
231551
C8/14/85
49.95
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOW
10- 4266- 422 -42
19231.18
_.. __.
231553
08/08/85
56.29
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 322 -3C
231553
OF/03/85
198.44
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
231553
^b /n..8/85
91.40
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS -
_
10- 4540 - 520 -52
231553
Ob/08/85
32.14
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
231555
.l6/ ^8/85
45.92
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
231553
Cb/08/85
141,09-
ELECTRIC
CORP _
REPAIR PARTS-------'-
10 -4540- 540 -54
„i
231553
08/C.8/85
177.25
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
231553
U8/(1.8185
1.26
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231553
U8 /CS /p5
35.32
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231553
f)8/C6/85
93.22
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231553
U / ^_.8/85
158.37
UNIT =D ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
231553
08/08185
- 20.77 --
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS - - -'
10- 4540- 646 -64
�i.
231553
U18/ ^8/85
67.50
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231553
U8/!?8185
41.54
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
231553
Cb / ^18/85
49.22
UNITED ELECTRIC
CURP
GEN SUPPLIES
_
40- 4504- 807 -80
�.
231553
08 /C8 /85
221.48
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 807 -80
231553
08/08/85
88.85
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
231553
C8 /0a/85 -
326.70 - -
-UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP -�
REPAIR PARTS - -` - -
-- 40 -4540- 801 -80 -
�'
231553
08/m/85
68.22 -
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
CREDIT
40- 4540- 801 -80
231553
Ub/08185
182.51
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTAS
50 -4540- 861 -86
231553
C8/C8185
6.15
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS -
_
50- 4540- 861 -86
u
231553
U8 /r8 /85
24.44
UNITED ELECTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
50- 4540 - 861 -86
19991�.C4 •
�„
+taraa
• +• -CKS
231558
08/13/85
120.00
GOODYEAR
CONTRACTEC REPAIRS �
10- 4248- 560 -56
23155a
u8/13/85
120.90
GOODYEAR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
240.70 •
`,,
•araaa
• +• -CKS
231569
08/0/85
316.49
VALLEY IND PROPANE
GASOLINE _- J J
28- 4612- 707 -70
^i
316.49 +
•+ • � • •
- -__
..-. - -- � -_
...
-- - - -_. -,
aaN CKS
-._--
231572
08/13185
442.38
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLY
50 -4514- 822 -82
231572
U8/131F5
741.49
VAN ?8PER CO
PAPER SUPPLY
50 -4514- 842 -84
I'
231572
08/13/85
908.55
VAN PfAPIER CO
PAPER SUPPLY
50 -4514- 862 -86
2,,092.42 •
arraar
aar -CKS
231575
08/12/85
19114.96
WATER PR63UCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 803 -80
19114.96 +
- - -
- +s. -CKS
231 578
08/13/85 _��i
104.45
YM.H.ZIEGLER _CO
INC-
PARTS_,
10- 4620 - 560 -56
v
v
1985
OF EDINA
CHECK STER
08 -19 -8 AGE 18
.J
CHECK NO..
-_
DATE
AMOUNT
T_ VENDOq _ _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N09 _ INV.
# P *0- # MESSAGE
104.45
231579
08/13/85
- 34.72
WILLIAMS STEEL -WDWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES —
10 -4504- 301 -30
231579
06/13/85
31.63
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
231579
08/13/85
34.02
WILLIAMS STEEL- HOVE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
_
231579
08/13/85
-� _ _
27.63
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE -- _
_
GENERAL'SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
231579
08/68/85
195.84
WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
323.14
/frrlf
* **-CKS
231582
08/08/85
— 467.60
GORDON SMITH Cd _
GASOLINE
27 -4612- 662 -66
467.60 •
AAkf #♦
- -
*** —CKS
231586
u3/O8/85
294.98
W W GRAINGER
GEN SUP_P
10- 4504 - 520 -52
_
2315956
08/14/85
294.72
Y W GRAINIER ^.T
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 449 -44
231586
08/08/85
58.73
Y W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
231 586
08/08185
97.45
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
_ 10 -4540- 540 -54
2315p6
_
08/L8/85
_ -_ _
120.25
W W GRAINGER
REPPIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
231596
U8/C8/85
17.76
Y W GRAINGER
REAPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
L
883.19
rfrl*f
*** -CKS
231590.
08/14/85
100.110
HENRY WR03LESKI
POLICE SERV _
10- 4100 - 420 -42
10 0,.0.0.
231591
08/14/85
- 61.87
_CECELIA SMITH
MILEAGE JUL- AUb -
10 -4206- 140 -14
61.87 *
-
*** —CKS
2316.73
!18/14/85
*35 _
_ WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY _
. _ _ - -- -- -
_RANGE BALLS
27- 4636 - 663 -66
- - - - -- -- - - - --
- -
_ — ._210
210.35 *
J
1frlfr
* ** —CKS
231613
:^8/13/85
74.25
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
'
231613_
06/13/85_
92.78 _
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
- -- -- -
-
-� - -.
_
167.03 *
�MCNEILUSSTEEL
aflrr#
*** -CKS
231700
06/07/85
377.79
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
231 10r.1
OS/!�8/85
608.58
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
32- 842- 8 4
23170^,
J8 /07- -/85 �T!
_
706.09 �^
NORTHSTAR ICE —
-----50-46
INVENTORR
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1,692.46
2317ii1
78/07/85
468 *JO
DAY DIST -.
INVENTORYu -- '�
- -50- 4630- 862 -86
468.'70
S:
—
...._�.....�.._.-.�
"--
231 lO2
_s_
ilb/D7J85���-
_ _ __
4,945.00'�'�
-. ____
LAKE RE STORATION_
FERN.ITS
10.4310- 35830
231772
08/13/85
100000
LAKE RESTORATION
PERMIT
10- 4310 - 358 -35
'
1985 CITY OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 19
1
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
59045.00 *
231/:,5 Ub /n7 /85 622.50 BARRETT MJVING CONT SERV_' 10- 4200- 500 -50
�. 622.50 *
231 704 0810 -AIB5 R - _- 845.00 ROBERT C KINGHORN -- - CONSTRUCTION ' 10- 1422 - 000 -00 - ' -
j�j 845.00 +
231705 98/UT/85 165.25 PREF -_RRED PRINTING PRINTING - 10 -4600- 627 -62
165.25 +
23170 6 nb /C7/85 - - �- 826.00 a -CHAMP IAN - - - GEN SUPPLIES--- T!" - -27- 4504 - 662 -66 - - '-
„ " 826.00 +
231707 Ob/14/95 721.45 RTN INC CONTRACT SERV -� 1C- 4200 - 510 -51
2317`)7 `b /(77/85 19377.33 RTV INC CONT SERV 10 -4200- 510 -51
W
�--' 231 70 8
231 7^ G
231-110
231 711
231 71 2
v 231 71 3
29098.78
U8/C7/85 15.00 SARA ANTONI'A LI REFUND TENNIS 10- 3500 - 000 -00
15.00
J6 /07/85 15.00 DIANE SMITH REFUND TENNIS 10 -3500- 000 -00
15.00 +
08/07- -/85 15.00 KATHr PEDERSON REFUND 10 -3500- 000 -00
15.00 +
78/07/A5 109. ^2 BOB G?EIG MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60
1D9.D2 +
On /CT /85 19.95 EDINA XTHLETIC ASSN PODL SUPPLIES 26 -4504- 688 -68
19.95 *
08/07/85 75000 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEEN CENTER 10 -4504- 627 -62
750.0.0 *
,r
131714.
U8 /Oa /85
15.00
MARILYN FISCHBEIN
REFUND
10- 3500- 000 -00
i
15.00
+
...I
i
231715
x8/07/85
50.30
FEDERAL EXPRESS
DUE FROM HRA
10- 1145 - 000 -00
i-
SQ.�70
W
•r * **+
* * * -CKS
231717
(18/08/85
141.54
- MTNVALCO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 520 -52
141.54
�?
^�
-�COND
231719
08/08/85
511.00
=LASER SERVICE _
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248 - 841 -84
50.00
*
231719
08 /08/85 -
12.30
6BLACK 8 ]ECKER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248.560 -56
12.3D
*
°-
231720 -
-- 08/08/85' -
-' 12.66 -"
- GENtRAL ELECTRIC
REPAID PARTS
140= 6540-- 801 -80� -
�;
if
12.66
v'
c�
1985
Y OF EDINA
CHECK .ISTER
08 -19 -. PAGE 20
a
_-
CHECK _N0._DATE
_
AMOUNT
VENDOR _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
_ ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
231721
Ud/08/85
39231.47
FEED RITE CONTROLS
WATER_ - �-
40 -4622- 805 -80
231721
18/08/85
626.79
FEED RPTE CONTROLS
-_ _ _
WATER
40- 4622- 805 -80
39858.26 +
G
7; `
231722
08/09185 - --
16.80
AM R_D CR]SS- ._'- __ - - -_
-1ST AIO Sl°FPLIES_-
T 26- 4510 - 688 -68-
16.80 •
E
231/23
IW13/85
66.35
WM J WA;LSW
MEETINGS -
10 -4202- 420 -42
66.35 +
=
231724
08/08/85
- 134.51C
RUTTGERS BAY LAKE
CONFERENCE-
- - 10 -4202- 460 -46
134.50 *
-
231725
G8/C8/85
250.50
EDLNA PET HOSPITAL
KENNEL SERVICE _
10- 4278 - 470 -47
250.50
231726
08/O8/E5- -
- - -�� 54.82
KAPAK CORD,
RADIO EQUIP
10- 4914 - 422 -42 -- -
54.82
231/27
Ub/ 118/85
83.70
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42
231727
08/ ^0/85
51.45
MPH INDUSTRIES INC
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 420 -42
134.45
- _
231128
U8/C8/85
5.321.10
HENN CTY TREASURER
ROOM & BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
5.321 .10 • -
- _ _-
. _ .
231129
.78/08/95
237.84
SHERIFFS DEFT
ROOM 8 BCARO
10 -4286- 220 -22
237.84 +
231730,
08 /P-R /85
49.99
UNITED STORES
UNIFORM ALLOWENCE
10 -4266- 421 -42
49.99 +
231731
Ud/ ^8/85
197.57
METRO MECH CONTRACT
REPAIR'PART§
26- 4540 - 689 -63
197.57
231732
0.8/p8/85
150.66
L L DIST SYSTEM
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624- 684 -68
150.66
231733
08/08185
60.00-
KRISTOFOR SCHOELLER
CORRECTION
10- 4120- 438 -42
231735
06/1-9/85
60.00_
KRISTOFOR SCHOELLER
BICYCLE SAFETY
10- 4120- 438 -42
231733
08/08/85
_
- 15.00 ___KRISTOFOR
_
SCHOELLER -
BICYCLE SAFETY
10- 4120 - 438 -42
15.00 +
231734
08/09/85
60.00
PAT J SEYK.O
WAGES
10- 4120 - 439 -42
231734
18/08/85
60.00-
PAT J SEYKO
CORRECTION
10 -4120- 439 -42
231734
36/08/85
60.00
PAT J SEYKO
BICYCLE SAFETY
10- 4120 - 439 -42
_
60.00 •
- -- -
I''
231735
U8 /OS /85
._ _ 67540.
AM TEST CENTER_
EQUIP, MAINT
10- 4274 - 560 -56
1
_
675.00 +
a°
231736
78/08_/85
43.41
ART SIGN MATERIAL_
GEN SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 688 -68
I-^
_ _..
43.41
_ _ • _ - - -
231757
178 /q8 /A5
15.00
SUSAMME JISSEU.46 -5
REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
08 -19 -85 PAGE 21
v!
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE
_ _
II(
Iy
15.0D
r
.
231/58
UK /(18/85
15.00
KAREN SOMERS
REFUND TENNIS
-- 10- 3500 - 000 -00
15.00
r
f
231739
08/78185 - --
- __._ --18.00
- - -`
-- CgARVA:RD M_DICAL -_ - - --
SUBSCRIPTION —
--10- 4502 - 440 -44-
"�P�
18.00
!c
C
231740
98/ ^8/85
442.25
OAVES FOOD WAGON
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
442.25
+
231741
08/58/85
215.90
__ -- CARLSON FRINTING -
GEN SUPPLIES - -- v
-- 10- 4504 - 520 -52 -
vI
231141
08/08/85
593.80
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 500 -50
609.70
•
..l
231742
08/ "8/85
114.75
LIEN CHEMICAL COMP
SERVICES
27 -4236- 661 -66
--
- _
-
114.75
-- -` -
•
__ - -
— -
_ _
-MILEAGE
_ -
�-
231743
08/08/85
66.70-
LOWELL MCCARTHY
10- 4208 - 600 -60
66.70
r
- - -- - -- -- - -._.
vI
231744
96/08/85
116.00
AM PLANNING ASSOC
DUES
10- 4204 - 120 -12
—
116.00
•
v
251745
U8/08/85
50.00
MN PLANNING ASSOC
MPA DUES
10- 4204 - 120 -12
I
50.70
•
231746
U8/13/85
119.11
E 2 GO TEXITRDN
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 671 -66
231146
08/08!85
34.82
E Z GO TEXTRON
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 671 -66
1 53.93
231747
08/18/85
46.54
TWIN CITY ELEVADTOR
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 520 -52
46.54
+
- - - --
231148
08/08/85
2950
RC IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN 8 SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
-
- - - --
2,50-*'-
L
231749
08/08/85
266s00
FRIOEN ALCATEL
SERV CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
t
266.'70
.
-
231750
48/08/85
175.00
ACME WINDDW CLEANING
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 375 -30
1�
V
23171
08/08/85
736.93
XEROX
DUE +IRA
10 -1145- 000 -00
736.F3
+
_ _..-.
—
231752
(16/08/85
14202
CITY OF RICHFIELD
SPEC ASSSSESS
40- 1110 - 000 -00
_
142.1 2
— - - — - - - - - —
— - - - -
- -- -
,J
231753
08/08/85
4.88.51
KENNY BOILER 8 MPG
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 708 -70
488.51
r
_
"
231/54
ici /08/85
3,775.67
FRANK B HALL 8 CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
v
.231755
08/08/85 ,'
_ 389..80
� RON LJUND � _ -.. .__.AUCTIONEER
FEE �,
- 10- 3350 - 000 -00
-
69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` --
�" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66
d
O
- - 15.00 +
0
1985
OF EDINA
08/12/85
CHECK ISTER
BONZELEIT
08 -19 -1 AGE 22
r_
t CHECK
NO. DATE _
AMOUNT , --
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
23 -4200- 610 -61
231764
ud/12/85
389.80 +
BONZ_LET
ART CNTR OeTTERY
23 -42CO- 610 -61
yJ
231/56
_6/8/85
450.16
JIM HATCH SALES CO
GEN SUPPLIES 4
10 -4504- 646 -64
231756
c8/C8185
75.15
JIM (HATCH SALES CO
TOOLS
10-4580- 301 -30
d
n
525.31 •
+• + + +•
08112/85
25.50
6RDER
PRT6 COST ART CNTR
.•. -CKS
231/58
Ub/12/85
1.000.']0
TESSMAN SEED CHEM
SEED _ - -
10 -4568- 353 -30
.
231766
.- _ - __
U8112/85
19000.00 +
-PAT
- A ^--
N.AIRE POOLS
CHEMICALS
-
26- 4564 - 689 -68
r
�-
� 231759
08/12/85
� 959.00 �
- �TRUSSBIILT _
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
28 -4248- 708 -70
231167
U6/12/85
950..0.0 +
CUSTOM P03LS INC
CHEMICALS -
26- 4564- 689 -68
23176U
08/12/85
314.32
THOMAS --& ASSO INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
r
231768
Od/12/85 _ -
314.32 +
P 8 H WAREHOUSE SALE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
I`I
'i. -- 231761
Ob/12/85 - --
-- - 4.62
WIN STEPH_NS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
}1
231761
Ob/12/85
51.50
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231761
08/12/85
26.06
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS__
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231761
06/12/85
56.75-
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
231761
18/13/85
268.10
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
231761
-38/12/85
16. ^.7
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
_
-
- " - 309.60 +
-
231762
08/12/85
184.25
M.R. SIGN COMP -
GUARD RAIL__MTRL
10- 4546- 340 -30
184.25
231763
08/12/85
_15.00
KATHY - STIEHM _-
_TENNIS REG REFUND
10- 3500- 000 -00
69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` --
�" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66
d
O
- - 15.00 +
231764
08/12/85
238990
BONZELEIT
ART CNTR POTTERY
23- 4200 - 610 -61
231764
08/13/85
6,2380C
BONZELeT
POTTERY ART CENTER
23 -4200- 610 -61
231764
ud/12/85
6,238.30-
BONZ_LET
ART CNTR OeTTERY
23 -42CO- 610 -61
231764
08/12/85
238.13
BONZELET
ART CNTR POTTERY
23- 4200 - 610 -61
231764
08/13/85
_
238.00, --
BONZELET -
POTTERY ART CENTER
23- 4200 - 610 -61
238.00 •
231765
08112/85
25.50
6RDER
PRT6 COST ART CNTR
23- 4600 - 610 -61
25.50 +
•- -�
.
231766
.- _ - __
U8112/85
- - ^- -
16 *98
-PAT
- A ^--
N.AIRE POOLS
CHEMICALS
-
26- 4564 - 689 -68
16.98 +
231167
U6/12/85
25.90
CUSTOM P03LS INC
CHEMICALS -
26- 4564- 689 -68
25.90
r
231768
Od/12/85 _ -
169.43
P 8 H WAREHOUSE SALE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
I`I
169.43
}1
231769
36/12/85 -
320.20
TH GARAGE DOOR PLACE
REPAIR PARTS y
27- 4540- 662 -66
320.30 +
69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` --
�" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66
d
O
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
NANCY KARKHOFF
CHECK REGISTER
ti h,I
08 -19 -85 PAGE 23
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV* # P.O. I MESSAGE
�. •�
23117P,
J.6/12/85
99.20
ZACKS INC
PARTS
27 -4620- 662 -66
10 -4504- 421 -42
90.37 *
434.45 *
06/13/85
9.73
231771
08/13/65
300.10
ROB NELSON
TENNIS INSTR
10- 4200 - 623 -62
06/13/85
300.00 *
THE MIRROR PLACE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 390 -30
231772
J8/13/85
100 *00
BETH BERTELSON
TENNIS INSTR
10 -4200- 623 -62
B A ROSE MUSIC CO
HUSK SUFPLY
10- 4596- 500 -50
100.00
204.25 *
231773
i6/13/85
215.00
INTERN C04F BLDG OFF
ED E CODE CONF
10 -4202- 490 -49
92.50 *
215.00*
'16/13/85
137.93
vl, 231774
18/13/85
195.00
SHERRY GRABINSKI
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
195.00
35.12
LAND CARE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
231775
231775
-� - -- 231775
231775
231776
231777
231178
231779
�.?
w
08/13/85
231 78Q
NANCY KARKHOFF
231 781
ti h,I
231 782
i
231 783
t i^i
231784
J8/13/85
231 785
�. •�
231736
10 -4266- 420 -42 -
231 787
�.?
w
08/13/85
36.00
NANCY KARKHOFF
LIQUOR LICENSE
10 -3033- 000 -00
08/13/85
20.28
NANCY KARKHOFF
PARKING EXP
10 -4206- 422 -42
J8/13/85
- 1.54 - - -'
NANCY KARKHOFF
POLISH - - -_ _ - --
10 -4266- 420 -42 -
U8 /13 /9c,
32.55
NANCY KARKHOFF
MEALS- UPS - BATTERIES
10 -4504- 421 -42
90.37 *
06/13/85
9.73
GAS SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504- 301 -30
9.73 *
06/13/85
50 *22
THE MIRROR PLACE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 390 -30
50.22 *
08/13/85
204.25
B A ROSE MUSIC CO
HUSK SUFPLY
10- 4596- 500 -50
204.25 *
06/13/85
92 *50
STERLING SUPPLY INC
GENERAL SUPPLY
40- 4504 - 803 -80
92.50 *
'16/13/85
137.93
GARLANDS INC
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 646 -64
137.93 *
08/13/85
35.12
LAND CARE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
35.12 *
96/13/85
75.00
IAAO
DUES
10 -4204- 200 -20
75.00 *
08/13/85
20.00
CITY OF ST. PAUL
FEES
10 -4202- 420 -42
20.00
0:8/13185
60.00
EDINA SPIN CLUB
CONTRACT SERV
10- 4200 - 500 -50
60.0.0 *
08/13/85
32.00
KAREN KELLY
SWIM REGISTR REFUND
10 -3500- 000 -00
32.00
;6 /13/85
35 *00
MN SOCIETY OF CPAS
MEETING
10 -4202- 160 -16
35.00 *
G8/13/85
30..3D
STATE TREASURER
DUES
10- 4204 - 500 -50
19P5
Y OF EDINA
CHECi G1STER
08 -19 -, PAGE 24
,; - -
CHECK
- --
NO. DATE _- ._
AMJUNT
- ...30.7
VENDOR __-
-- - - -- - -- -
ITEM_ DESCRIPTION
- - -----
- ACCOUNT NO* INV* # P.O. f MESSAGE
�
I.�
®
+
I•�
231766
08/13/85
23.37
VECTOR ONE
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 420 -42
I! I
23.37
*
231789
- V8113185 -
!- 127.00
--1 -' -,- NELSON RADIO COMM -
PARTS - - -�- ' - - - --
- -10- 4620- 560 -56
127.00
231790
'18/13/85
29586.72
LABOR RELATIONS
CONTRACT SERV
10- 4200 - 140 -14
2x586.72
*
F
231791
U8/13/85
18.75
CI TV OF HDPKINS _
GENERAL- SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
I
18.75
*
231792
7b/13/P5
88.40"
GENERAL BINDING
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 260 -26
88.40
*
231193
Ub/13/85
V 647.50-'
_ CONCEPT MICROFILM - --
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50 -
';�
64.50
j
231794
06/13/P5
39424.75
BERGERSON B CASWELL
REPLACEMENT CK - r
- 60- 2040 - 000 -00
j°
39424.75
+
231 795
08/14/85
10.25
- -- - -.ICMA T -- -
" -BOOKS
10- 4502 - 140 -14
10.25
•
231196
U6/14/b5
100.00
ZAHLS EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS -�
10- 4540 - 646 -64
231796
,:.b/14/85
4,015.00
ZAHLS EQUIP CO
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 000 -00
,.
49115.00
23179/
U8/14/85
15070
SALLY SYNHALVSKY
TENNIS REG REFUND
10- 3500 - 000 -00
15.00
231798
08/14/85
13.18
HENN CTY DEPT OF
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
13.18
*
I;
231799
U8/14/85
71 *00
PLTNEY BOWES
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
71.30
• _ -
+'I
23180(I
08/14/85
35.70
LAWT)N PRINTING INC
BLDG CODE TAB SETS
10 -4204- 490 -49
t
35.70
231831
C8/14/85
284.22
HUDAK PRIVTERS
PRINTING
27- 4600 - 660 -66
284.22
*
_
2318 "12
Oo/14/85
79.25
CANS REGISTER SALES
EQUIP MAINT
27 -4274- 663 -66
- --
__
^ - - - - -- .79.25_*
231803
08/14/85
168 *60
BRAEMAR QUICK PRINT
PRINTING
27- 4600 - 660 -66
-
"I
168.60
*
2318::4
O.b/14/85
169406.00
POLAR CHEVROLET
PAYMENT
10 -4900- 260 -26
169409.00
+
2318C5
08/14/85
25x879.21
PROGR CONTRS INC
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
a.
4
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK PEGISTER
02 -19 -85 PAGE 25
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. I P.O. 4 MESSAGE
=
259879.21
*
231806
Jo/14/85
639168.72
BURY B CAR.LSONS INC
PAYMENT -
'60- 2040 - 000 -00
639168.72
+
'
231817
1111/14/85
369981.74
" RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC
PAYMENT- .__ - -
60- 2040 - 000 -00
i�
369981.74
+
f?j
231 80 8
Ub /14/85
669934.43
BROWY B CRIS INC
PAYMENT'
60 -2040- 000 -OG
669934.43
+
231 8D 9
08/14/85
149250 *10
-CARL BOLA'IDER B SONS
PAYMENT WOALE �
60- 2040 - 000 -00
149250.30
•
23181
9.8/14/85
434.00
PEGGY CAROLE
PREPARE DIGEST
10 -4200- 140 -14
434.20
*
T
231b11
08/14/85
100.00
MN SOCIETY OF CPAS
CONF &'-SCHOOLS
10 -4202- 160 -16
-;
100.00
*
231812
'28/14/85
25.00
RAT CINK
MACHA DUES
10 -4204- 480 -48
_. :
25.00
*
I
r *rrr •
- -
- --
** * -CKS
231814
Ob/14/85
33.80
LYNDALE GARDEN CTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 642 -64
33.80
*
_...
231815
08/14/85
8.00
ICMA
FLSA REPCRT
10- 4572 - 440 -44
8.00
"�.
231816
08/14/85
19 ^.00
PHYSIO CONTROL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
231810
ub /14/95
396.20
PHYSIO CONTROL
FIRST AID SUPPLY -�
10- 4510- 440 -44
586.20
*
231817
Uts/14/85
17.60
L J RU3BER STAMP CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES-------
10- 4504- 440-44
17.60
*
f
231818
08/14/85
19625.00
DAVE OLIW_R
TREE REMOVAL - -��
60- 1300 - 002 -18
I
19625.0.0
+
�^
�
231819
08/14/85
_ - 670.00
!'KC GROVES TREE' EKP - - - -_
TREE- REMOVAL - - - -_
60- 1300 - 002 -18 -
670.00
231820
48114/85
200
ARTWORK SOLD
ART WORK SCLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
:�•;
231820
48/14/85
2.10
ARTWORK SOLD
ART WORK SCLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
231820
08/14/85
2.10-
ARTWORK SOLD
ARTWORK SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
_
2.10
+ - - - -- --
231821
'38/14/85. _
_ ._ 2.10.
.._ARTWORK SOLD
ARTWORK SCLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
_I
2.10
_ ..___
•
231822
'18/14/85_ -_
39.90
ARTWORK SOLD
ARTWORK SCLD
23 -3625- 000 -00
i 9n
T
39-9T
_-
`� -,
_ 231823
08114/85 ��
- �W_ 2. 80 _.__.,,..._-
__A.RTWORK_SOLD, -, ._�ARTWORK
SCLD �
23 -3625- 000 -00
�.i
.I
tie '
1985
r OF EDINA
I.I 231831 I~h/14/85
27.75
CHECI
;ISTER
.,
OP -19- PAGE 26
d:I
231832 '16/14/85
464.JD
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50
k.
464.00 •
'
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
L
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE
61910
FUND 20 TOTAL
2.80
785.17
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER �-
�•
1.529.15
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
231824
,6/14!85
22.40
ARTWORK
SJLD
ARTWORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
FUND 29 TOTAL
^I
199662975
22.40
•
1169594.43
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
431
— 231825
08/14/85
-- — -- 3.15
-_
-- ARTWORK
SOLD -
- — ARTWORK
SCLO
23 -3625- 000 -00 -
,,.
I
3.15
+
231826
08/14/85
31.50
ARTWORK
SJLD
ARTWORK
SOLD _
23 -3625- 000 -00
31 .50
•
!'` -
-- 231827
08/14/85
29.40
-_a—
ARTWORK
SOLO - -
- - - -ART YORK
SCLD - - -
-- 23- 3625- 000 -00
29.40
•
231528
Ua/14/85
7.00
ARTWORK
SOLO
ARTWORK
SOLD - v -
23 -3625- 000 -00
7.00
•
-
-- 231829
u8/14185 --
— 28,0.0
—'~-
ARTWORK
SOLD
- ARTWORK
SOLD
T23- 3625- 000 -OC -
:,
29.00
.
231630
08/14/95
105.43
ARTWORK
SOLD
ARTWORK
SCLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
108.00
•
I
�.i
.I
tie '
—
5 _.
I.I 231831 I~h/14/85
27.75
ARTWORK SOLO -
CONTRACTUAL SERV '- 23- 4200 - 610 -61
.,
20.75 •
231832 '16/14/85
464.JD
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50
k.
464.00 •
-- - - CKS
L
232,087.24
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
61910
FUND 20 TOTAL
785.17
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER �-
�•
1.529.15
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
199994.38
FU40 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
99207.41
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND _ -
w.,
29.40
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
199662975
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
1169594.43
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
431
214,184.99
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
a, -- - - -
— 6149134992- --
-- -TOTAL
�.i
.I
tie '
Y
5 _.