Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-08-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 19, 1985 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL I. AMENDMENT OF SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN II. SALE OF LAND BY CITY OF EDINA TO HRA ADJOURNMENT EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Neil Jahr EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of July 15, 1985, and Special Meetings of July 22, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. AWARD OF BIDS - $12,000,000 General - Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 $ 1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Wooddale Park Improvements (Cont'd from 8/5/85) III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. First Reading a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence - Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd St. B. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Indian Hills 3rd Addition - Gustafson and Associates - Generally located south of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road C. Final Development Plan 1. PCD -4 Planned.Commercial District.- Richard Page - Generally located east of Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street 2. Planned Industrial District - Hoyt Construction - Generally located south of West 78th Street and east of Cahill Road D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Ten Year Capital Improvement Program IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Engine Analyzer (Cont'd from 8/5/85) (All bids to be rejected) B. Administrative Vehicle VI.. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 13, 1985 B. Boards /Commissions Appointment Process C. Set Budget Hearing Dates 1. Budget Submittal (9/9/85) 2. Proposed First Hearing (9/16/85) D. Review of EIS - Homart Development E. Construction.Manager - Braemar Clubhouse Addition F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Edina City Council Agenda August 19, 1985 Page Two VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. Resolution Authorizing Dispatch and Use of City Equipment and Services by City Manager in Emergency Situations VIII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four- fifths (4 /5).favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading 1. Ordinance No. 118 - Moratorium on Skateboard Ramps IX. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the following claims dated 8/19/85: General Fund'$232,087.24, Park Fund $60.00, Art Center $785.17, Swimming Pool Fund $1,529,15, Golf Course Fund $19,994.38, Recreation Center Fund $9,207.41, Gun Range Fund $29.40, Utility Fund $19,622.75, Liquor Dispensary Fund $116,594.43, Construction Fund $214,184.99, Total $614,134.92. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Monday Sept 2 LABOR DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Monday Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Monday Sept 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room (Special Assessments Hearing) AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 19, 1985 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL * I. AMENDMENT OF SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN * II. SALE OF LAND BY CITY OF EDINA TO HRA ADJOURNMENT EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Neil Jahr EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of July 15, 1985, and Special Meetings of July 22, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. AWARD OF BIDS - $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 $ 1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 II.. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment.heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. * A. Wooddale Park Improvements (Cont'd from 8/5/85) III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths -(4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Zoning Change 1. First Reading * a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence - Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd St. B. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Indian Hills 3rd Addition - Gustafson and Associates - Generally located south of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road C. Final Development Plan * 1. PCD -4 Planned.Commercial District.- Richard Page - Generally located east of Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street * 2. Planned Industrial District - Hoyt Construction - Generally located south of West 78th Street and east of Cahill Road * D. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Ten Year Capital Improvement Program IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Engine Analyzer (Cont'd from 8/5/85) (All bids to be rejected) * B. Administrative Vehicle VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 13, 1985 * B. Boards /Commissions Appointment Process C. Set Budget Hearing Dates 1. Budget Submittal (9/9/85) 2. Proposed First Hearing (9/16/85) * D. Review of EIS - Homart Development * E. Construction Manager - Braemar Clubhouse Addition F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items Edina City Council Agenda August 19, 1985 Page Two VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. Resolution Authorizing Dispatch and Use of City Equipment and Services by City Manager in Emergency Situations VIII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading * 1. Ordinance No. 118 - Moratorium on Skateboard Ramps IX. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the following claims dated 8/19/85: General Fund $232,087.24, Park Fund $60.00, Art Center $785.17, Swimming Pool Fund $1,529,15, Golf Course Fund $19,994.38, Recreation Center Fund $9,207.41, Gun Range Fund $29.40, Utility Fund $19,622.75, Liquor Dispensary Fund $116,594.43, Construction Fund $214,184.99, Total $614,134.92. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Monday Sept 2 LABOR DAY - CITY HALL CLOSED Monday Sept 9 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Monday Sept 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room (Special Assessments Hearing) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 15, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Turner and Mayor Courtney- MINUTES of the Regular and Special Meetings of June 17, 1985 were approved as submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A5 ADOPTED ON SECOND READING; PRD -3 ZONING APPROVED FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION (BRUTGER COMPANIES). Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the subject .property.is located.west of Cahill Road and .south of.Dewey.Hill Road.. At its June 17., 1985 meeting, the Council had heard the request for .final rezoning and preliminary plat approval and had referred the matter back to the staff and the Community Development and Planning Commission to consider changes to the landscap- ing plan so that it would be consistent with adjoining properties and to allow an opportunity for the residents of the adjoining condominiums to comment on the plan. Brutger representative Steve Wilson met with members of Windwood Condominiums and Dewey Hill Condominiums on Monday, June 24, 1985. At the Planning Commission meeting on June 26, 1985 the developer presented a revised landscape plan. Also submitted at that meeting were.petitions from residents of Dewey Hill Condominiums in opposition to the proposed development. The Planning Commission also received a letter from the president of Windwood Condominiums Association approving the revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the revised landscape plan substantially increases the sizes of the stock and also increases the number of plantings.and emphasizes perimeter screening on the north, west and south sides of the development. The Planning Commission at its meeting on June 26 recommended approval of the revised landscape plan. Mr. Larsen clarified that the referral to the Planning Commission was for review of the landscape plan and that the request before the Council now is for final rezoning and preliminary plat approval. Mayor Courtney stated that he had received many letters from adjoining residents, copies of which have been provided.to the Council-Members. Bob Gunderson, attorney for Brutger Companies, noted that the concept for the project has been approved, sub- ject to further review of the landscape plan and that the developer had met with the adjoining residents for their comments. Steve Wilson, Brutger Companies, stated that some changes have been made to the landscape plan and in meeting with representatives from the Windwood Association they have found it acceptable as indicated in the letter from the president of the Association. dated June 26, 1985. In the meeting with representatives of Dewey Hill Condominiums, the conversation tended to move away from the landscape plan,and there was no resolve of the matter. Mr. Wilson then.reviewed the landscape plan pointing out the changes in type, size and number of trees-and submitted that it is now compatible with the landscaping found on adjacent properties. Mayor Courtney stated that from the letters he had received the chief objection to the development was that townhouses were proposed rather than a condominium building such as Dewey Hills Condominiums. Voicing their concerns and objections were Alvin.Piiller,.Jack._Forciea and Albert Levine of 5501 Dewey Hill Road, and Alvyn Pope of 5601 Dewey Hill Road. Mr.' Gunderson responded that the project will offer new housing for families to enter Edina and support the community, that the development is.a quality project and will bring in quality people. No further comments being heard, Member Turner moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A5 as follows: ORDINANCE No. 825 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -3) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -3) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: The East 440 feet of the South 550 feet of the North 30 acres of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the U.S. Government Survey." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor 7/15/85 Member Turner commented that each of the Council Members has listened to the concerns expressed, has viewed the property and area, and reviewed the land -. scape plan. The proposed project is consistent with the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and the density is appropriate. Regarding the traffic concerns raised, Member Turner stated that if warranted we have measures for reviewing increased traffic and the need for some kind of control. Member Kelly commented that the Council must be guided by the Comprehensive Plan in attempting to deliver various types of housing for the community and that -she is satisfied that it.will:.be a first class project. There were no further comments. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved.and_ ordered placed on.file. Planner presented the proposed plat for the Foster Green Addition, generally located west of Cahill Road and.south of Dewey Hill Road, which illustrated a lot for each individual building and all other property would remain as an outlot and be controlled by a condominium association. The site plan illustrates 26 townhouse units and 24 condominium units for a total of 50 dwelling units in seven buildings. Albert Levine, 5501 Dewey Hill Road, stated his objections to the proposed plat. He __ said there should only be one curb cut onto Cahill Road, that guest parking was at a bare minimum, that the northwest building should be set back further, and that there was an intense use of ground cover and urged the Council to limit the number of units.to be placed upon the site. No further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR FOSTER GREEN ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Foster Green Addition ", platted by Brutger Companies, Inc., and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the petition for preliminary plat approval noting that the subject property is located south of Grove Street and on the east end of the cul -de -sac on Oak Lane. The property is part of an.earlier subdivision of the area and measures 138 feet in width, 239 feet in depth and is 33,057 square feet in size. The proponent is requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable lot of 12,237 square feet with the remaining 20,830 square feet designated as an outlot. A previous replat of this property included the dedication of an extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way must be acquired before this could take place. The property is now accessed by a temporary cul -de -sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner of the property. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proponent's intent is to create one buildable lot while reserving the balance of the property for future subdivision. Since the balance of the property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable without replatting. The lot size of the proposed lot is similar to other lots in the vicinity. At its June 26, 1985 meeting, the Community Development and Planning commission approved.the preliminary plat. No comment being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Austin Replat", platted by Curtis E. Austin, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member..Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A7 GRANTED FIRST READING; R -1 to R -2 ZONING FOR ROBERT ANDERSON (425 WASHINGTON AVENUE). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen stated that the subject property is located at the corner of Washington Avenue and Maloney Avenue. County Road 18 is located to the immediate west of the site and Grandview Cemetery is to the south. The property is a vacant lot measuring 70 feet in width, approximately 125 feet in depth and contains 8,898 square feet of lot area. Robert Anderson, proponent, is requesting rezoning of the site from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to allow the construction of a two -unit dwelling. This request was heard at the May 20, 1985 Council Meeting at which time the motion for rezoning failed. At its meeting of June 3, 1985, the Council took action to 7/15./85 re -hear the request. Mr. Larsen pointed out that on the two -block stretch of Washington Avenue there exists a variety of R -1 lots and R -2 lots. Currently, there are six R -2 lots ranging in.width from 76 feet to 124 feet with most being 76 to 79 feet in width. There are eleven existing R -1 lots ranging between 45 and 78 feet in width. Lots fronting on Washington Avenue are shown by the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for conversion to this type of use.. Since the last Council Meeting the proponent has presented a petition from several neighbors in the area in support of his petition for the rezoning. The Community Develop- ment and Planning Commission and staff recommend approval. Mr—Larsen-noted that, if the Council were to approve rezoning, the request would still have to petition the Board of Appeals and Adjustments for variances for lot width and lot size. Robert Anderson, the proponent, referred to the photograph he had submitted to the Council and said the proposed dwelling would be similar and that he understood that the plans would have to be approved by the Board of Appeals. He added that he had talked to his neighbors and no one objected to the double unit dwelling. No further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A7 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A7 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Lot 14 and the south 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 9, "West Minneapolis Heights ", except that part of said Lot 14 lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet north from the southwest-corner of said Lot 14 to a point on the south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east from the southwest corner of said Lot 14." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner who commented that she supported the proposal for the reasons that it is a transitional area, it is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as low density attached residential and that the proposed dwelling is appropriate for this site because of the busy highway and other doubles in the area and that, even thought variences are required, it would not set a precedence. Mayor Courtney said he agreed with Member Turner.. Rollcall• Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR CREEK VALLEY BAPTIST CHURCH (6400 TRACY.AVE.) Planner Larsen presented the request of the Creek Valley Baptist Church, located at 6400 Tracy Avenue, for a Conditional Use Permit. Creek Valley Baptist Church is proposing construction of additional classroom space, restrooms and general storage. The addition would contain a total of 3,780 square feet, 2,680 square feet of which would be on the main floor, and would be to the south of the existing structure. All classroom activities are currently held in the basement. No other changes to the site are contemplated at this time. The Zoning Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for any expansion of a church in the R -1 District. Based on the 132 seats in the sanctuary, 44 parking spaces should be provided. The exist- ing parking lot provides parking for 53 cars. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the church is situated in a relatively isolated location. To the west and south are City owned open space areas and to the north is the Crosstown Highway. The site contains mature landscaping that provides additional screening. The design and materials of the addition will match the existing building and parking will be provided in adequate.numbers. The Community Development and Planning Commission heard the request at its meeting of June 26, 1985 and recommends approval. No comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Condi- tional Use Permit to the Creek Valley Baptist Church at 6400 Tracy Avenue for the purpose of constructing a 3,780 square foot addition to their existing building, according to plans submitted; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Permit be subject to the following condition: 1) Building materials for the addition must match the existing materials. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 7/15/85 . UPDATE GIVEN ON WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland advised that the Wooddale - Edinamite event held on July 13, 1985, as a goodbye to the school and a benefit for The Edina Foundation, was a success. He has met with representatives of St. Stephens Episcopal Church, 50th and Wooddale Avenues, regarding the parking lots - 42 spaces in Wooddale Park and 52 spaces in Utley Park, estimated at a cost of approximately $100,000 and they have indicated that they feel the church will participate in an assessment project for the parking lots, payable over 20 years. Mr. Kojetin has met with the neighborhood group and they have concluded that the park plans fit well with one exception. They are concerned about the total amount of-parking between the two parks. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the existing parking now at Wooddale School consists of 88 spaces so, basically, the church would be preserving the present parking. Mr. Rosland suggested that the Council hold a hearing so that the neighborhood residents could offer their comments regarding the parking improvements.. Following some discussion, it..was informally agreed to place the Wooddale Park improvements on the August 5, 1985 Council agenda and to notify the Country Club District and immediate adjoining residents. BID AWARDED FOR REMOVAL AND BACKFILL OF WOODDALE SCHOOL. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for the removal and backfill of Wooddale School showing Carl Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500.00, Minnesota Lumber & Wrecking Corporation at $127,955.00, Doty & Sons, Inc. at $163,000.00 and Duluth Superior Erection at $174,500.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Carl Bolander & Sons Company at $123,500.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR TWO FALLS MODEL TAH -9 WINGS FOR SNOW PLOWS. Mr. Rosland pre- sented tabluation of bids for two Falls Model TAH -9 Wings for snow plows showing LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00 and Little Falls Machine at $7,410.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing & Sale at $7,373.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR TO PUMP FOR WELL #6. Mr. Rosland advised that emergency repairs were required for the pump for well X66. Tabulations of bids showed Layne Minnesota, Inc. at $6,855.00, Keys Well Drilling at $8,275.00, and E. H. Renner & Sons at $8,050.00. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Layne Minnesota, Inc. at $6,855.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF JULY 9, 1985 APPROVED. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 9, 1985: 1) That NO PARKING ANYTIME signs be installed along the east and north sides of Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Olinger Road simultaneously with the opening of the Bredesen Park parking lot, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER FIVE YEAR PLAN REPORT GIVEN. Michael Kelly, Chairman of the Edina Community Center Advisory Board ( ECCAB), advised.that the ECCAB is appointed by the school superintendent and has been in existence for four years. Initially the ECCAB was responsible for all the closed schools in addition to operating the Edina Community Center. Mr. Kelly stated that the parking problem will be.-alleviated by the addition of the new parking lots which will provide 230 additional spaces and the re- striping of the South View parking lot will double the capacity.for overflow parking from the Community Center. The task of the ECCAB this year was to develop a.Five Year Plan of operations and recommenda- tions related to the long term structure of a Community Center for the City of Edina. A conceptual outline which was presented to the ECCAB in 1984-was _ summarized.with..the.comment that it formed the basis for the recommendations and the Plan.. Graphics were presented showing Community Center space use, both leaseable and non - leasable; hours of scheduled use; actual area use versus potential use; projected use for next five years; five year expense summary of capital improvements totaling $464,764; rental operation financial overview and organizational structure. Mr. Kelly gave a.summary of the Board's recommendations as follows: 1) A non - profit Edina Community Center entity be established to be the responsible operating entity for the Center, 2) The School District and the City of Edina be equal direct participants in the governance of the entity, 3) The School District lease the Community Center building and appurtenant land to the non - profit entity for 20 years or longer for $1.00 /yr., 4) The School District .7/15/85 lease space back that is currently occupied and used by the District, 5) The School District and the City support the capital needs of the Community Center, 6) The five year operating budget be adopted, and 7) The principal planning recommendations be adopted. Mr. Kelly stated they are hoping to have the building in operation as an independent entity by the end of 1985. The Community Center has had a success- ful beginning under the auspices of the District. It is an active facility, with enough experience in operation to assure its future and is now ready to become a true community directed facility. This information has been presented to the School Board. The District plarsto work with the City on a planning committee level to talk about a joint participation in the operation of this facility as a community center. No action was taken by the Council. AIRPLANE NOISE OVER CITY DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney,stated that he has received many telephone calls from residents regarding the increased aircraft noise over the City. Mr. Rosland pointed out several factors which have contributed to this: 1) there are more flights in and out of the metropolitan airport, 2) recent heat /humidity do not give the planes -lift and 3) wind conditions mandate use of the main runway. In discussing the problem with the staff, the following suggestions were made: 1) Staff will attend the meeting of local and state officials representing the communities surrounding the airport to be held at Richfield City Hall on July 25, 2) If, in fact, the airport authorities are moving the flights around to distribute. the noise burden, they should publically inform the populace of their procedures so that people can understand what is happening, and 3) A report will be brought back to the Council. No formal action was taken. PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR NUMEROUS SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. As recommended by staff, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT HEARINGS FOR GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141 WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352 STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -174 STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. L -25, L -26 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. The Clerk and Engineer having calculated the proper amounts to be assessed for the improvements set forth in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter recorded, and the amounts proposed to be assessed against the respective lots, places and parcels of land within the'districts affected by said improvements, and said proposed assessments having been filed with the Clerk, the same are hereby approved and the Clerk shall keep the same on file in her office and open to public inspection pending hearings thereon as herein provided. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the Notice of Hearing form hereinafter contained, to pass upon said proposed assessments and the Clerk's action in publishing notices of said hearings in the official newspaper in accord- ance with law is hereby approved. Notices being as follows: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS Grading Improvement No. C -141. Watermain Improvement No. WM -352 Street Improvement No. BA -137A. Maintenance Improvement No. M -85. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -368 Storm Sewer Improvement No. St. S -174. Street Lighting Improvement Nos. L -25, L -26. EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota on Monday, September 16, 1985, at 7:00 P.M. to hear and pass upon objections, if any to the following proposed assessments. These assessments are now on file in the office at the Edina City Clerk and open to public inspect- ion. Assessment on the following will be payable in one equal installment with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 112 %.per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1986. 1. CONSTRUCTION OF MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85. District description: 50TH STREET AND FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT. The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: Lot 21, 22 and South 422 feet of Lot 20 and North '7-2 feet of Lot 23, except road; that part of Lot 24 lying South of the North 37 feet of Lot 24; Lot 25 and North 147 feet of Lot 29 and East 1 foot of North 147 feet of Lot 30; Lot 26 thru 28 and South 3 feet 7/15/85 -• of Lot 29 also West 65 feet of South 119.9 feet of Lot 30. and East 1 foot of South 133 feet of Lot 30 except street; West 119.9 feet of Lot 33; South 126 feet of Lot 34 and East 13 feet of Lot 35; West 28 feet of East 41 feet of South 90 feet of Lot 35; commencing at a point in South line of Lot 35 distance 41 feet West from South- east corner thereof thence North 90 feet thence East 28 feet thence North 36 feet thence West to East line of West 74.2 feet of Lot 35, thence North along said East line to North line of South 160.3 feet of Lot 35 thence West along North line to West line thereof thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence East to beginning also that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Easterly of a line running from a point in South line thereof distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner thereof to a point in North line thereof distance 21.45 feet West from Northeast corner thereof; East 85 feet of West 120 feet of East 172 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot 36 except.street; that part of South 150.3 feet of Lot 36 lying Westerly of a line running from a point in South line distance 21.9 feet West from Southeast corner thereof to.a point in North line thof distance 21.45 feet West from Northeast corner thereof.except street; that part of the following described premises lying below the elevation of 899 feet mean sea level 1929 adjustment: the South 43.5 feet of North 166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 and the South 2 feet of East 6 feet of North 166.5'feet of Lot 43 and that part of Lot 43 lying South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly and Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on the East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 lying South of North 123 feet thereof; Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 and the North 166.5 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43, Auditor's Subdividion No. 172 and that part of Lot 43 lying South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly & Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 distance 181.05 feet North of South line thereof except that part of the above described premises lying below the elevation of 899 feet mean sea level 1929 adjustment described as follows: the South 43.5 feet of North 166.5 feet of West 54 feet of East 60 feet of Lot 43 and the South 2 feet of East 6 feet of North 166.5 feet of Lot 43 and that part of Lot 43 lying South of North 166.5 feet thereof and East of Registered Land Survey 1426 and Northerly of a line drawn from the most Southerly & Easterly corner of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 to a point on the East line of West 107 feet of Lot 44 distance 181.05 feet North of South line thereof also that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey 1426 lying South of North 123 feet thereof; West 107 feet of North 120 feet of Lot 44; that part of Lot 45 described as commencing at a point in Northwest corner of Lot 47 thence South to Southwest corner thereof thence West 13.9 feet thence South 1.1 feet thence West 36.1 feet thence South 2.4 feet thence West to a point 7 feet East from West line of Lot 45 thence North 134.75 feet thence West 4 feet thence North to South line of West 50th Street thence East 87 feet thence South to be- ginning; South 70 feet of East 150 feet of Lot 45 and North 2 feet of East 1/2 of Lot 49; North 102 feet of East 1/2 of South 1/2 of Lot 49 except road; commencing at a point in East line of.Lot 49 distance 2 feet South from Northeast corner thereof thence South 40.16 feet thence West to a point in West line of East 1/2 of Lot 49 distance 43.3 feet South from Northwest corner thereof thence North 41.3 feet to a point 2 feet South from North line of said Lot thence East to beginning; South 177.5 feet of Lot 31 except street; South 177 1/2 feet of Lot 32 and that part of the North 1/2 of Lot 34 lying East of West 14.75 feet thereof and South of Allatas 1st Addition except street; thence West 49 feet of Lot 47 and that part of the East 51 feet of Lot 47 lying North of the South 2.45 feet thereof; the North 113 feet of the South 183 feet of East 150 feet of Lot 45, Auditor's Sub- division No. 172 except that part,thereof below the elevation of 897 feet above mean sea level and lying North of a line described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said South 183 feet thence on an assumed bearing of 50 degrees 20 minutes 20 seconds along the East line of Lot 45 a distance of 4.15 feet to the point of beginning of the line being described thence West 48.18 feet thence Westerly 49.02 feet along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 101.29 feet thence South 62 degrees 16 minutes 17 seconds West to a distance of 32.39 feet thence Southwesterly 43.93 feet along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 50 feet to the West line of the East 150 feet of Lot 45 and there ending; East 52 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot 36 except street, all.in Auditor's Subdivision No. 172; Lot 8, Lund Kruse Addition; Tract C, Registered Land Survey 1426; Lot 1 and the West 35 feet of East 172 feet of South 150 feet of North 1/2 of Lot 36, Auditor's Subdivision No. 172 except street; Replat Lot 6, Block 1, Lund Kruse Addition; Lot 1, Block 1, Steven's First. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -25 District description: Between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Avenue. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: West 1/2 of Lot 2, Block 2; West 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 2; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3; East 1/2 of Lot 3, Block 3; NORMANDALE ADDITION. 7/15/85 3. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -26. District description: Corner of Ashcroft Lane and West 63rd Street. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lot 19, Block 2; Lot 8, Block 3; VALLEY VIEW RIDGE ADDITION; Lot 16, Block 3; Lot 1, Block 4; VALLEY VIEW RIDGE 2ND ADDITION. Assessment on the following will'be payable in three equal installments over a period of three (3) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 112% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1986. 4. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352. District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,,2-,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION. 5. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368. District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION. 6. CONSTRUCTION OF GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141. District description: Arthur.Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION. 7.. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER NO. ST.S. -174. District description: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition. The area proposed to be assessed is as follows_: Lots 1,2,7,8, Block 1, MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION. Assessment on the following will be'payable in ten equal installments over a period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 112% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1986. 8. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A. District description: Hansen Road from Vernon Avenue to West 60th Street. The area proposed'to be assessed is as follows: Commencing at West line of Gov't Lot 6 at a point 143.95 feet South from the Northwest corner of South 1/2 of Lot 6, thence East 327.9 feet to a point in the West line of Block 4, Codes Highview Park distance 143.87 feet South from the North line of South 1/2 of Gov't Lot 6, thence South along West line of said Block 4, a distance of 123.87 feet, thence West 327.9 feet to a point in the West line of Lot 6, distance 123.95 feet South from beginning, thence North to beginning except road; SEC. 33, TWP 117, RANGE 21 (33- 117- 21 -32- 0001); Lots 7 thru 12, Block 3, CODES HIGHVIEW PARK ADDITION; Lot 1 (that part of the South 16 rods lying East of RR right of way); Lots 2 and 3,-Block 1, EMIL P. ERICKSON ADDITION; Lot 6 (South 135 feet of North 202.7 feet lying East of RR right of way); that part of Lot 6 lying East of RR right of way and North of South 399 feet thereof also that part of Lot 7 lying E of RR right of way; that part of the North 202.7 feet of Lot 6 and of Lots 7,8 and 9 lying West of a line described as follows: .Commencing at a point 55.6 feet West from West line of RR right of way and 264 feet North from South line of Lot 6, thence North 30 East 146 feet thence North 200 East 630 feet, thence North parallel with East line of Garden Park Addition to South line of Eden Prairie Road, all in GARDEN PARK ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, E.V. KLOPP'S SUB- DIVISION; Lots 11 thru 16, Block 3, MELODY KNOLLS SIXTH ADDITION; Lots 1 and 2, NAOMI ADDITION; Lot 1 and West 50 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, HAYDEN ADDITION; Lot 1 and adjacent part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right of way; Lot 2 and South 90 feet of North 190 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right of way; Lot 3 and South 109 feet of that part of Lot 33, Warden Acres lying East of RR right of way; Lot 4, all in Block 1, THEO. NELSON'S ADDITION; Lots 13,14 and that part of Gov't Lot 3 lying Northwesterly of M.N. &S. RR right of way as widened except road, Lots 15 and 16, RICHMOND HILLS THIRD ADDITION; Lots 5 thru 8, Block 1, TOWN'S FIRST EDINA ADDITION; Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES BERG REPLAT; Lots 7 thru 9, Block 7, WESTCHESTER KNOLLS ADDITION; Lots 1,2,5, Block 1, WOODY POINT ADDITION. First - payment of these assessments will be payable with the taxes for the year 1985 collectible in 1986. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of the property assessed for the above improvements may pay the'whole of the assessment without interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1985, or make payment with accrued interest to the County Treasurer. Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.`081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within thirty (30) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. However, no appeal may be taken as to an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the Clerk of the City of Edina prior to the hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. 7/15/85 Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,.the City of Edina.has adopted standards and guide- lines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payments would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice. For further information and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. BLAKE SCHOOL REQUEST FOR DRIVEWAY ACCESS DISCUSSED. Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager, advised.that Blake Schools, Hopkins, has requested the use of a portion of the streetcar right of way which is located on the south.side.of the Blake .Schools property to route school bus traffic out the southwest corner of their parking lot. The proposed school bus exit route would be onto the vacated street- car right of way, existing onto Second Street South. Edina and Hopkins each own a portion of the streetcar right of way. The distance from the parking lot to the street is approximately 400 feet. Currently, it is being used as a bike path. A public informational meeting was held by Blake Schools for concerned neighbors on July 10, 1985. The request is presented so that if there is the possibility for the City of Edina to grant permission for the subject area to be improved to accommodate.bus: traffic, staff would suggest a public hearing be set for August 5, 1985 with notices to abutting property owners on the Edina side. Mr. Hughes noted that Marlys Canter and Mr. Stoddard were present representing Blake Schools. In response to Member Kelly's question as to the amount of bike traffic, Mr. Hughes said it was substantial and was an active bike trail. He pointed out that the greater concern was unauthorized use by cars and other.vehicles trying to short cut into the school parking lot. Attorney Erickson submitted that there might be a legal problem with allowing a private use of public property. Member Kelly made a motion setting a public hearing on the matter for August 5, 1985 if the City Attorney determines that there is no legal,problem with the proposed use of public property. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. APPOINTMENTS MADE TO EDINA FOUNDATION AND HEALTH BOARD; FOUNDATION BY -LAW CHANGES DISCUSSED; OTHER VACANCIES CONTINUED. Mayor Courtney recalled that at its last meeting, the Council informally agreed to hold the appointment of two directors to The Edina Foundation so that the matter of staggered terms could be determined and to see if any other individuals are interested..in serving on the Board. After a brief discussion, Member Kelly made a motion that Robert Sherman and John Skager- berg be.reappointed to The Edina Foundation Board for terms to be established by the amended Bylaws.. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. James Van Valkenburg, President of The Edina Foundation, reported that he had met with the School Board regarding proposed changes to the Bylaws_ :They had agreed that.the Bylaws be amended.to stagger the .terms so that in any given year one repre- sentative from the School District, the City, and the membership at large is appointed. Also discussed.was .the matter of residency and number of successive terms. The School Board had indicated that six board members should be residents of the City and that ten years should be the maximum for serving on the Foundation Board. It-was'informally agreed that draft Bylaws should :beprepared reflecting the changes as directed by the Council and the School Board. Mayor Courtney then submitted that Eileen Cooke, 3705 W. 61st Street, had submitted her name for appointment to the Advisory Board of Health. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly appointing Eileen Cooke to the Advisory Board of Health for an unexpired term to February 1, 1986. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Mayor Courtney pointed out that there is a vacancy on the Community Development and Planning Commission and also on the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and that a number of.individuals have submitted their names for appointment. It was informally agreed to ask those individuals who have not done so to submit back- ground information /resumes to aid the Council in making the appointments at the next Council meeting. CONSUMER DEPOSIT LEVIED AGAINST WEST i OF LOT 5, BLOCK 3, AND EAST 30 FEET OF LOT 1, BLOCK 4, WOODBURY PARK NEAR LAKE HARRIET. Mr. Rosland advised that a request has been to allow Sheryl L. and David M. Waterman, 3800 West 55th Street, 7/15/85 to pay the water connection charge from Watermain No. 335 to their property, the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3 and the East 30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury Park near Lake Harriet, over a.,,period of six years at the applicable interest rate. It was explained that this is a longer run connection than normal and connection charge would be a consumer deposit so that if the watermain is ever extended in the future, a portion of the deposit would be refundable. Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assessment of a consumer deposit for water connection for Watermain No. 335 in the amount of $2,645.62 to be levied against the West 1/2 of Lot 5, Block 3, and the East 30 feet of Lot 1, Block 4, Woodbury Park near Lake Harriet over a six -year period at an interest rate of 711%.... Rollcall: .Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. UMBRELLA INSURANCE DISCUSSED; LIABILITY INSURANCE CAP OF $500,000 AFFIRMED. Mr. Rosland advised that a quote for $1,000,000 umbrella insurance has been received. The cost would be $77,000, plus an additional $20,000 to bring the Police liability up to $1,000,000. A.major condition is that the City would be required to purchase additional coverage to bring the City's liability insurance up to $1,000,000. This additional coverage was quoted at $82,000. The net result would be that in order to purchase the $1,000,000 umbrella, the final cost would be $179,000. Staff would not recommend this option. As an alternative, because the City's current liability coverage is $500,000 and does not meet the liability cap set by the State of $200,000/600,000, it is recommended that we bring the City's liability coverage up to $1,000,000 and not purchase the excess umbrella coverage. The cost to the City under this option would be $82,000 and would put our level of liability in excess of the State cap. Attorney Erickson explained that the courts have been acting pro- spectively rather than retroactively to impose liability where people have been acting reasonably upon the statutory limitations. He pointed out that if the City brought their liability coverage up to $1,000,000 it would.be covered as to tort__. liability.by exceeding the statutory minimum.except for one area. The statute also recently added a third catagory of liability for cities which was the release or threatened release of toxic substances which established the maximum liability at twice the liability for other kinds of torts. Therefore, the City would have a possible exposure for hazardous substances of $1,200,000. Mr. Rosland advised that insurance companies at the present time will not write hazardous substances insur- ance. If the Council elected not to increase the City's liability coverage, it would in effect be self- insuring for any judgment over the City's coverage. After further discussion, Member Bredesen made a motion to stay with the current liability coverage of $500,000 and not to purchase the umbrella coverage as quoted. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Member Bredesen asked that the staff document the..City's..risk management program f6r.review by the .Council at its August.5,.1985 meeting to determine if it is adequate, that it is documented and that a rational person would agree that the City took reasonable steps to prevent loss problems from occuring. FEASIBILITY REPORT ON STREET & BRIDGE REPLACEMENT (WEST 44TH STREET) APPROVED; HEARING DATE SET. Engineer Hoffman presented a Feasibility Report on street and bridge replacement for West 44th Street from.T.H. 100 to the Soo Line Railroad, advising that the project was previously approved by the Council but reconfir- mation is required prior to bid opening. The report also recommended sidewalk repair at various locations in the Country Club District— Member Bredesen intro- duced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -262 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -34 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed Street and Bridge Replacement and Sidewalk Replacement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, August 5, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: 7/15/85 (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -262 S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01 SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -34 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 5, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements.are estimated by the City as set forth below: West 44th Street - T.H. 100 to Brookside Court ESTIMATED COST Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter - Improvement No. P -BA -262 $323,404.87 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvements includes Lot 17 and 19, Aud. Sub'd. No. 176; Lots 10 and 11, Thielen's Brookside; Lots 7 and 8, Subd. No. 176; Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 4, Arden Park -Third Addition; and Lots l and 2, Block.3, Arden Park 3rd Addition. Country Club District ESTIMATED COST Sidewalk. Replacement Improvement No. P -S -34 115,338.88 The area proposed to be assessed includes all properties in the Country Club District, Brown Section and Fairway District. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATE SET FOR EDINBOROUGH UTILITIES AND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO SOUTH- EAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly, setting August 19, 1985, as hearing date for Edin- borough utilities and amendment to Agreement to Southeast Edina Redevelopment. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON EDINA PROSECUTION. Mr. Rosland stated that, in response to the Council's request, a report has been prepared on the matter of Edina prosecution and resulting costs which in 1985 have been running above the.--amount budgeted. In preparing the 1986 Budget, the Council may wish to consider a policy question on the degree of enforcement the City should pursue. Mr. James Van Valkenburg reviewed the report noting in particular the increased number of DWI citations and a total of 12,243 citations issued by the Police Department in 1984. He also pointed out the complex procedure of a file through the court system. Mr. Marsh Hallberg, Prosecuting Attorney, commented that there is a trend towards requiring community service of defendants instead of imposing fines resulting in reduced revenues. Personalities involved in the court system also have a great effect upon how efficiently the system may run which also affects revenues. Member Bredesen commented that, if the public policy of.the State is .to- encourage cities to prosecute DWIs and other offenses and then impose a financial penalty for strict enforcement, this should be addressed to our representatives in the legislature; that the residents of the City should not be forced to pay the cost associated with DWI prosecution through their tax levy:, He suggested-that a letter communicating this be sent to our representatives and /or the Municipal Legislative Commission. No formal action was taken. FIRE DEPT ORGANIZATION /PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; CONT'D TO 7/22/85. Mr. Rosland stated that the paramedic program has been under discussion for several years and that the Council, after consideration of alternatives and recommendations, will decide if the paramedic service will continue to be delivered by the City or by some alternative system. Mr. Rosland then called on Robert Buresh, Public Safety Director, to explain the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system. Mr. Buresh explained that the City's authority starts with the State who by statute regulates EMS at least to the Advanced Life Support (ALS) level. We also get our authority through an Hennepin County EMS Ordinance which regulates various aspects of the EMS program. Medical direction comes from a Hennepin County EMS medical director who monitors all operational aspects of the program. The records part of the system is regulated through the Community Health Depart- ment who monitors us via reports in relation to the other ambulance services in 7/15/85 the community. Because the system is complex, the Hennepin County EMS Council was developed, made up of representatives from all parts of the system, to over- see the process and the Council is continually reviewing the many aspects of the system to upgrade it to meet current needs. If the City chooses to give up its license from the State, we notify the Community Health Department and they in turn would refer the request to the Zoning Committee of the Council. The Zoning Committee will evaluate this service area to see where it most likely should go. Mr. Buresh noted that local requests as to provider usually prevail. In the alternative, the City could negotiate directly with another provider for EMS services. Hennepin County is interested in taking over this zone at an estimated cost of $375,000 per year to operate.one unit around the clock, plus administra- tive costs for an approximate total of $500,000. It was pointed out that this would be a lose situation as EMS service in Edina will not generate $500,000 in revenue. William Feck, Fire - Chiet, then presented graphics showing the following: 1) emergency medical calls and.response times,-2)..1984 costs for 27 -man fire suppression force and ambulance fee revenues, .3) paramedic program costs for 1984, 27 -man fire suppression force, 4) Edina Fire Department 1985 budget with added costs for two additional paramedics, 5) paramedic program costs for 1985, 29 -man suppression force, 6) paramedic program costs and revenues, and 7) comparision of ambulance service fees. Member Bredesen asked why it is assumed that the fire force would remain the same if the City were not doing paramedic work-and if the force were reduced would there not be a major savings in cost. Mr. Buresh responded that when fire suppression services are inter- related with another service it becomes more complex. On the fire suppression side, the department is geared up to handle an initial response to a structural fire of one of Edina's average largest homes. Anything more than that would be handled by mutual aid. He illustrated the normal response as set out by the national standards for fire suppression -and pointed out that problems can develop quickly if you operate with short manpower. This response requires a team of 10 to 13 firefighters to suppress the fire safely. It means that 8 men must be scheduled on a day shift to work out vacations /holidays, plus the chief officer and 3 people in the fire prevention bureau. On evenings and weekends the schedule can.be stripped.down to a.8-man-.shift because`it:_is easier to get off -duty response and volunteer help. Mr. Buresh pointed out that there are 6 to 10 working fires per year of this type that involve the entire structure; many. are caught in the earlier stages. He explained that service levels are a function of economics, tradition, politics, professional opinion, management, attitudes and related services. A major factor in keeping the Fire Department budget in line has been the development of the building inspections program which involves the Department in plan review of new building construction and remodeling, beginning with Southdale Center in 1955. Mr. Buresh presented a graphic showing a typical service level including fire suppression, emergency medical services and fire prevention and control. The Department has integrated the firefighters into the related services of the City. If the EMS service.'is reduced, it would give the Department more man - hours to be involved in other aspects of fire suppression. If the fire suppression side of the Department is reduced, it would definitely affect the related services. Mr. Rosland stated that he has been working with John Maloney, union representative, as to how the union perceives the survival of the paramedic program. They have proposed the following: 1) paramedics would continue'to be firefighters principally, 2) within three months the City would bring the Department up to 29 men, 3) the City would maintain at least 3 paramedics per 24 -hour shift and when this number is not possible, the paramedics on duty would be kept from all but emergency duties; they would also not be asked to change shifts to avoid this problem, 4) the City would make every effort to recruit and train paramedics from within the Department, and 5) if the preceding were accomplished, 7 of the presente8 paramedics would.continue as paramedics through 1986. Mr. Rosland advised that in researching other alter- natives, there are three other providers, Hennepin County, Smith - Martin and.Fair- view- Southdale Hospital. He introduced Dr. Timothy Crimmins, emergency physician at- Fairview- Southdale Hospital, advising: that he=.is the..- new..medical:.;.director for the paramedic program. Dr. Crimmins stated that he trained at the Hennepin County Medical Center, is chairman of the Ethics Committee of the EMS Council and has had the oppor- tunity to observe the EMS system through the metro area and is very familiar with each of the ambulance services. He identified five areas to.consider when-looking at ambulance service: 1) how fast can we get an ambulance to the patient's home, to that instution, to that public place or out on the highway, 2) what quality of medical care can we deliver once there, 3) professional attitude of the paramedics, 4) what other services can the paramedics provide to the community, and 5) who can do it at the lowest cost. He evaluated the alternative providers. Smith -Martin, after investigation by WCCO and alledged serious wrongdoings has been bought out by another entity and are going through reorganization to improve their quality of care. Hennepin County Medical Center has excellent quality of care and have good response times, but not as good as the Edina based service. Hennepin County is a big service covering a large area.. They are constantly moving.their paramedics around through- out the system and tend to be a little out of service at times. Dr. Crimmins said that the Edina paramedics are very familiar with the community and buildings in the 7/15/85 City and know how to get to patients fast, that they have a very professional attitude, and that by maintaining the service in Edina the City has control of its funding. The Edina paramedics provide other services to the community, e.g. fight structural fires, inspect buildings, are involved in community education and teach CPR to first responders in the community. He also noted that there is an unseen factor of cooperation with the Police Department. That the team effort at the scene of an emergency results in better medical care. Dr. Crimmins stated that he felt the Council should make the commitment to add at least two paramedics to make.the Edina fire -based system work. James Fel- senthal, 6936 Hillcrest Lane, made a plea to increase the paramedic force to insure that the residents of Edina are served properly and promptly in emer- gency situations. Mr. Rosland recalled that in 1979 a study was made of the manpower, and organization of the Fire Department and it was felt that the City could survive the paramedic system with a 29 -man suppression force with help by re- establishing the volunteer system. That volunteer system has been established.- Fees for ambulance service have been raised to surpass the county level and a.tougher collection policy has been adopted. It is estimated that in 1985 fees will generate revenue in excess of $200,000 which will pay for two additional paramedics on the regular firefighter salary as well as picking up approximately the $113,000 cost of the paramedic program. Mr. Rosland said he would recommend that the City hire two additional paramedics to survive the fire -based paramedic program. He added that if we find we cannot survive the program, we would have to look at the size of our fire suppression force and look at a level of service the City could provide. He stated that there is an excellent opportunity to work with Fairview - Southdale Hospital to provide EMS service and that if the Council should decide to look at other, providers, the staff would like the opportunity to let those providers present a full and detailed report to the Council as to their EMS services. Douglas Erickson, 5020 Richmond Drive, urged the Council to continue the Edina paramedic program. Alison Fuhr, 6609 Brittany Road, also spoke in support of the recommendation. Member Bredesen commented that he would like to have time to digest the infor- mation presented before acting on the recommendation and suggested it be brought back on the Council agenda or considered at a special meeting. Member Kelly said she concurred with Member Bredesen. It was informally agreed to continue the consideration of two additional paramedics to the special meeting scheduled for July 22, 1985,.at 5:00 p.m. No formal action.was taken. ORDINANCE REGARDING SPECIAL PURPOSE POOLS TO BE DRAFTED. Member Kelly advised that she had received a telephone call from a resident concerning requirements for wading pools. Mr. Rosland advised that an ordinance will be drafted for the Council's consideration at the next meeting. UPDATE GIVEN ON PROPOSED HOMART DEVELOPMENT IN BLOOMINGTON. Mr. Hughes gave a brief report on the hearing before the Metropolitan Council and their comments on the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Homart development in Bloomington. After a brief discussion, it was suggested-that the Mayor again write a letter to Mayor Lindau of Bloomington with the request that the two councils meet to discuss the development. Staff was also asked to prepare a draft of our concerns regarding the density and traffic impact of the project. No formal action was taken. ALISON FUHR APPOINTMENT TO REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD SUPPORTED. Mr. Rosland advised that the Regional Transit Board is meeting on July 22, 1985 to consider applications for members of the Board whose membership is being reduced from 15 to 9 members. Mrs. Alison Fuhr is currently serving on the Board and would like to continue. A letter of recommendation on her behalf has been sent to the Board and she would welcome Council support. No formal action was taken. AMM SEEKING.MEMBERS TO SERVE ON LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEES. Mr. Rosland advised that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities is seeking persons to serve on various legislative committees. He noted that Member Turner chairs the Housing Committee. Mayor Courtney said that he has volunteered to serve on the General Legislation Committee. MLC LEGISLATIVE DINNER SCHEDULED FOR JULY 24. Mr. Rosland informed the Council that the Municipal Legislative Commission Operating Committee has scheduled a legislative dinner at the Decathlon Club on July 24, 1985, with Representative William Schreiber as speaker and asked that the Council Members contact him if they wish to attend. HENNEPIN COUNTY PARK RESERVE DISTRICT REORGANIZATION NOTED. Mr. Rosland said that the Hennepin County Park Reserve District is re- forming and members of the Minneapolis Park Board will no longer be serving on the Board after September 1. In their place, commissioners will be appointed from the suburbs, two to be 7/15/85 appointed by the - Hennepin County Board of Commissioners and one will be appointed by the four remaining suburban members. The name will be changed to the Suburban Hennepin Regional.Park District Mayor Courtney said he was interested and would appreciate the Council's support. Mr. Rosland said he would submit Mayor Courtney's name to be considered for appointment. BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262. As recommended by staff, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMRPOVEMENT NO. BA -262 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BRIDGE REPLACEMENT BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262 CONTRACT 485 -8 (ENG) S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01 BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 7, 1985 SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Wednesday, August 7, 1985. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 19, 1985 to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 1200 L /F, Concrete Curb and Gutter. 500 Tons, Bituminous Paving 1 Remove Old Bridge and Replacement 600 L /F, 10" Steel H- Piling 79 C /Y, (1A43) Structure Concrete 196 C /Y, (3Y43) Structure Concrete 24,910 Pounds, Reinforcement Bars Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina; 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base bid. The City Council reserved the right to reject any or all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion for - adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS: AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC SALE. Mr. Dalen recommended that the City authorize the issuance and public sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds to finance the Edinborough redevelopment project and of $1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds to finance the construction of improvements to Braemar Golf Course. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 7/15/85 RESOLUTION RELATING TO $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985; AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLIC SALE THEREOF BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby determined that it is necessary and beneficial for the City to construct improvements to the municipal golf course consisting of the construction of a maintenance building, the upgrading of the par 3 golf. course and the con- struction of an addition to the clubhouse. This Council further determines that in order to finance this acquisition and betterment of recreational facilities for the City of Edina, it is necessary for the City to issue and sell its General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 in the principal amount of $1,200,000 (the Golf Course Bonds) pursuant to Minn- esota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. This Council estimates that the net revenues derived from the operation of the municipal liquor stores, in excess of the cost of operation and maintenance thereof, in the .fiscal year which ended December 31, 1984, equals or exceeds the maximum amount of principal and interest to become due in any future fiscal year on all of the out- standing Golf Course Bonds of the City, dated as of December 1, 1963, on all of the outstanding Recreation Center Bonds, dated as of November 1, 1978 of the City and on the Golf Course Bonds, as proposed to be issued under the terms set forth in this Resolution. Prior to the delivery of the Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985, to the purchaser, the Council will establish a fund for the payment of principal and interest on the Golf Course Bonds. The Council will appropriate and credit to such fund an amount of revenues of the municipal liquor stores which is equal to the average annual amount of principal and interest to become due on the Golf Course Bonds. 2. Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581 and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, the City Council of the City does authorize the issuance and sale of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 (the Tax Increment Bonds) in the principal amount of $12,000,000 for the purpose of providing funds for the payment of the public redevelopment costs needed for a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10, to be undertaken in accordance with. the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, within a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, previously established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina and approved by the City. The Golf Course Bonds and the Tax Increment Bonds are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bonds ". 3. In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.54, subdivision 2, the maturities of the Tax Increment Bonds are combined with the maturities of the General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, of the City, for the purpose of compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.542 sub -. division 1. 4. It.is hereby determined that this Council shall meet at the City Hall at 7:00 o'clock P.M. on August 19, 1985 to receive, open and consider bids for and award the sale of the Bonds. 5. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said sale to be published at least 10 days in advance of the bid opening in a legal newspaper having general circulation in the City, and in a periodical published in Minneapolis, Minnesota, giving financial news and of general circulation throughout the State, which notice shall be in substantially the following form:. NOTICE OF SALE $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) will meet at the City Hall in Edina, Minnesota at 7:00 o'clock P.M. Central Daylight Time, on Monday, August 19, 1985, to receive, open and consider the bids for and award the sale of $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 and $1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 (the Bonds) of the City. The Golf Course Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf course, and the Tax Increment Bonds will be issued for the purpose of financing the public redevelopment cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken in accordance with the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. Dated September 1, 1985, the Bonds will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: .7%15/85 $1,200,000 ' $12,000,000 $13,200,000 Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities of this issue and by lot within maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned. Dated: July 15, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk 6. The following shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and .issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will meet at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday, August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by the City upon the following terms and conditions: PURPOSE The Bonds will comprise two issues: $1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf course; and $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued to finance the public redevelopment cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475. BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT AND PAYING AGENT The City will select a suitable bank or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of September 1, 1985. The Bonds will be issuable only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is Golf Course Tax Increment Year Bonds Bonds Total 1988 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 1989 50:,000 $ 150,000 200,000 1990 50,000 150,000 200,000 1991 50,000 150,000 200,000 1992 50,000 150,000 200,000 1993 100,000 200,000 300,000 1994 100,000 200,000 300,000 1995 100,000 400,000 500,000 1996 100,000 900,000 11000,000 1997 100,000 900,000 11000,000 1998 150,000 900,000 1,050,000 1999 150,000 900,000 1,050,000 2000 150,000 900,000 1,050,000 2001 11000,000 11000,000 2002 11000,000 _ 11000,000 2003 11000,000. 11000,000 2004 11000,000 11000,000 2005 1,050,000 1,050,000 2006 1,050,000 1,050,000 $1,200,000 ' $12,000,000 $13,200,000 Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semiannually on each January 1 and July 1 thereafter. All Bonds of an issue maturing in 1997 and thereafter are subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City and in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities of this issue and by lot within maturities of an issue, on January 1, 1996 and any interest payment date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. A legal opinion with respect to each issue of the Bonds will be furnished by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Copies of a statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale and additional information may be obtained from the undersigned. Dated: July 15, 1985. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk 6. The following shall constitute the terms and conditions for the sale and .issuance of the Bonds, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause the following terms and conditions to be incorporated in material distributed to prospective bidders for the Bonds. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE $12,000,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND $1,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION GOLF COURSE BONDS, SERIES 1985 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, will meet at 7:00 o'clock P.M., Central Daylight Time, on Monday, August 19, 1985, to receive, open and to consider bids for and award the general obligation bonds (the Bonds) of the City in the aggregate principal amount of $13,200,000 to be issued by the City upon the following terms and conditions: PURPOSE The Bonds will comprise two issues: $1,200,000 General Obligation Golf Course Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1961, Chapter 655, and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, to finance the construction of improvements to the City's municipal golf course; and $12,000,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985 to be issued to finance the public redevelopment cost of a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 273.77(a) and 462.581, Chapter 475. BOND REGISTRAR, TRANSFER AGENT AND PAYING AGENT The City will select a suitable bank or trust company to act as Bond Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the Registrar). The Bond Register will be kept, principal and interest will be paid to the registered owner of each Bond and transfers of ownership will be effected by the Registrar. The City will pay the charges of the Registrar for such services. The City reserves the right to remove the Registrar and appoint a successor. DATE, TYPE AND DENOMINATION The Bonds, as originally issued, will be dated as of September 1, 1985. The Bonds will be issuable only as fully registered Bonds in denominations of $5,000 or any multiple thereof, of single maturities, with interest payable by check or draft mailed to the person in whose name each Bond is 7/15/85 registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the month preceding each interest payment date, as shown by the register :maintained by the Registrar. Principal is payable upon surrender of each Bond at maturity or upon prior redemption at the office of the Registrar. MATURITIES The Bonds of each issue will mature on January 1 in the following years and amounts: Golf Course Tax Increment Year Bonds Bonds Total 1988 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 1989 50,000 $ 150,000 200,000 1990 50,000 150,000 200,000 1991 50,000 150,000 200,000 1992 50,000 150,000 200,000 1993 100,000 200,000 300,000 1994 100,000 200,000 300,000 1995 100,000, 400,000 500,000 1996 100,000 900,000 1,000,000 1997 100,000 900,000 1,000,000 1998 150,000 900,000 1,050,000 1999 150,000 900,000 1,050,000 2000 150,000. 900,000 1,050,000 2001 11000,000 1,000,000 2002 11000,000 1,000,000 2003 11000,000 11000,000 2004 11000,000 11000,000 2005 1,050,000 1,050,000 2006 1,050,000 1,050,000 $1,200,000 $12,000,000 $13,200,000 REDEMPTION Bonds of each issue maturing in 1997 and subsequent years will each be subject to redemption and prepayment at the option of the City in whole or in part, and if in part, in inverse order of maturities and by lot within maturities, on January 1,.1996, and any interest payment date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus accrued interest.to the date of redemption. INTEREST Interest will be payable on January 1, 1986, and semi - annually thereafter on each January 1 and July 1. All Bonds of the same maturity must bear interest from date of issue until paid at a single, uniform rate. Each rate must be in an integral multiple of 5/100 or 1 /8th of 1 %, and no rate of interest or the net effective rate of any issue of Bonds may exceed the maximum rate to be determined in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, subdivision 4. DELIVERY Within 40 days after the sale, the City will deliver to the Registrar the printed Bonds ready for completion and authentication. The original purchaser of the Bonds must notify the Registrar, at least 5 business days before delivery. of the Bonds, of the persons in whose names the bonds will be initially registered and the authorized denominations of the Bonds to be originally issued. If notification is not received by that date, the Bonds will be registered in the name of the original purchaser and will be issued in denominations corresponding to the principal maturities of the Bonds. On the day of closing, the City will furnish to the purchaser the opinion of bond counsel hereinafter described, an arbitrage certification and a certificate verifying that no litigation in any manner questioning the validity of the bonds is then pending or, to the best knowledge of officers of the City, threatened. Payment for the Bonds must be received by the City at its designated depositary on the date of closing in immediately available funds. LEGAL OPINIONS A legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be provided by Dorsey & Whitney, of Minneapolis, Minnesota. The legal opinion for each issue of Bonds will be printed on the appropriate Bonds at the request of the purchaser. The legal opinion will state that the Bonds are valid and binding general obligations of the City enforceable in accordance with their terms, except to the extent enforceability may be limited by State of Minnesota or United States laws relating to bankruptcy, reorganization, moratorium or creditors' rights generally. TYPE OF BID AND AWARD Sealed bids for not less than $12,945,000 and accrued interest on the principal sum of $13,200,000 must be mailed or delivered to the undersigned and must be received prior to the time stated above. No bid may be altered or withdrawn by the bidder after the time specified above for opening bids. Each bid must be unconditional and accompanied by a cashier's or certified check or bank draft in the amount of $264,000, t 4' 7/15/85 payable to the City, to be retained as liquidated damages if the bid is accepted and the bidder fails to comply therewith. The bid offering the lowest net interest cost (total interest from date of Bonds to stated maturities, less any amount more than $13,200,000 or plus any amount less than $13,200,000 bid for principal) will be deemed most favorable. In the event that two or more bids stated the lowest net cost, the sale of the Bonds will be awarded by lot. No oral bid and no bid of less than $12,945,000 for principal, plus accrued interest on all Bonds will be considered. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids, to waive informalities in the bid, and to adjourn the sale. CUSIP NUMBERS The City will assume no obligation for the assignment or printing of CUSIP numbers on the Bonds or for the correctness of any numbers printed thereon, but will permit such numbers to be assigned and printed at the expense of the purchaser, if the pruchaser waives any extension of the time of delivery caused thereby. Information for bidders and bidding forms may be obtained from the undersigned. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk 7. The City Treasurer - Finance Director, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare on behalf.of the City an official statement to be distributed to potent- ial purchasers of the Bonds. Such official statement shall contain the statement of Terms and Conditions of Sale set forth in paragraph 6 hereof and such other information as shall be deemed advisable and necessary to adequately describe the City and the security for, and terms and conditions of, the Bonds. Attest: City Clerk Mayor The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member Turner, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney and the following voted against the same: None whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted, signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. LIQUOR FUND REPORT as of May 31, 1985 was presented, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by.Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner, for payment of the following claims dated 7/15/85: General Fund $86,405.25, Art Center $6,881.82, Swimming Pool Fund $1,205.90, Golf Course Fund $74,754.97, Recreation Center Fund $3,530.50, Utility Fund $14,511.86, Liquor Dispensary Fund $89,437.88, Construction Fund $296,965.60, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $7,265.99, Total $580,959.67. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 22, 1985 .4:00 P.M. The Edina City Council held a closed meeting regarding potential litigation on July 22, 1985, at 4:00 p.m. Present were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, and Mayor Courtney. Also present was Kenneth Rosland, City Manager; Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager; Craig Larsen, Planner; Thomas Erickson, City Attorney; Marcella Daehn, City Clerk; Ms..Becky Comstock and Mr. James Van Valkenburg. Mr. Rosland explained that the meeting was called to consider the City's position with regard to the proposed Homart Development project in Bloomington. Member Richards asked to be excused because.of a possible conflict of interest and left the meeting. Mr. Hughes and Mr. Erickson explained that.Edina must submit written comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) by July 23, 1985, and suggested various strategies whereby the City of.Bloomington may be willing to compromise and reduce the intensity of the project. Following considerable discussion, the Council Members informally agreed that the City-should respond that.the EIS is.inadequate with regard to the Bloomington Comprehensive Plan and the traffic studies for the proposed Homart project. The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m. with no formal action being taken. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 22, 1985 5:00 P.M. Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. FIRE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION /PARAMEDIC PROGRAM DISCUSSED; DECISION MADE TO HIRE TWO ADDITIONAL PARAMEDICS. Mr. Rosland recalled that at its meeting of July. 15, 1985 the Council had heard presentations regarding the Fire Department organization and the paramedic program made by Robert Buresh, Public Safety Director and William Feck, Fire Chief. Dr. Timothy Crimmins, medical director for the paramedic program, also had-addressed the..Council and identified the advantages of the City's fire -based paramedic program over EMS services from outside providers and urged that two additional paramedics be added to the program. The Council had informally agreed -to continue the matter to this special.meeting to have time to assimilate the information presented before taking action. Mr. Rosland reiterated his recommendation that the City hire two additional paramedics to survive the fire -based paramedic program. He indicated that there was one additional piece of information regarding Fair- view- Southdale Hospital. They are in the process of changing to a new billing system and when that is functional they will still be willing, even though the City maintains its fire -based paramedics, to do the ambulance billing and collect the monies for EMS services for the City. Mr. Rosland noted that a memorandum has been prepared by Mr. Buresh listing the major issues that support the hiring of two additional paramedics for the Fire Department. Speaking in support of the recommendation and keeping the City's paramedic program were Bob Solberg, Everett Erickson, Joe'_Berg, Doug:Erickson. and an unidentified gentleman. In response to a question of Doug Erickson, Mr. Rosland clarified that it is felt a 29. -man department will give the paramedic program stability, and the recommendation is to add two additional paramedics in the next few months.- He added that there are several retirements anticipated and the City would hire paramedics for those replacements, who would also be trained as firefighters. Member Bredesen asked Mr. Rosland if the paramedic program could survive if more of the present firefighters trained to be paramedics without adding the two additional paramedics. Mr. Rosland said.it_ could but there does not seem -to be the interest among the firefighters to train as. paramedics. Member Turner commented that we should establish a service level" in the areas of fire suppression, paramedics and fire prevention and then take a look at the alternative-::ways we can meet that service level. At the last meeting, Dr. Crimmins came closest to analyzing alternatives in terms of criteria, e.g. respon 'se time, quality of care, professional attitude, cost to the consumer and cost.to the taxpayer.in general. She added that, based on information to date, the Edina fire -based paramedic program comes out the closest to meeting those goals of any of the alternatives mentioned. What is missing is how Fairview - Southdale Hospital could meet those goals as they have not submitted a definite proposal. Member Turner said that this would be her approach.and that at this point she would .support the Manager's.recommendation. Dr. Crimmins said that the key question is how - should the City provide the EMS service. To make that decision...the.Edina paramedic service must be weighed versus the other alternative services available. If the decision is to provide it as a City fire -based program, then it must be given the support it needs; e.g. staffing, funding and Council and citizen support. Member Kelly stated that the Fire Department organizational plan as presented by the Public Safety Director requires the addition of two paramedics, that she feels strongly that the paramedic service should remain within the community, and made a motion that the City Manager be directed to hire two additional paramedics. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Member Bredesen asked when the two paramedics would be hired inasmuch as it is a non - budgeted item this year. Mr. Rosland said the intent would be to hire them within the next 3 to 4 months and the cost would have to be made up in the 1986 budget. Member Kelly commented that the program is moving towards being self- supporting. Member Bredesen commented that he felt everyone in the Fire Department should be trained to be paramedics, that if the community wants to have a combination fire /paramedic service than that is what we should have working for the City; also, that if the City hires men as paramedics they should not be able to opt out of the service. He said he felt that fire suppression should be a separate issue in the Fire Department's organization. Member Richards commented that we do not have all the facts yet and that he would like to look at all the options before changing the status quo. He emphasized that no one has ever said that paramedic service will be dis- continued, but that the Council has been looking at how to best deliver the service to the citizens of Edina. He said he felt that the issue has been a confrontation situation at all times and that he did not intend to support adding two people that may or may not be needed; that he would support bring- ing someone who could give an objective analysis of the options so that the 7/22/85 Council could determine what is best for the citizens of Edina. After further discussion, Mayor Courtney called the motion. Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Bredesen, Richards Motion carried. .STRATEGIC PLAN /SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES FOR 1986 TO BE DISCUSSED ON 8/12/85. Mr. Rosland advised that staff has been reviewing the Strategic Plan and the key issues identified last year and it was felt that the Council should look at those - issues in light of the outside influences on the City which have recently been noted. Discussion followed as to when the Council should meet -for. strategic planning and it was informally agreed to schedule a Special Meeting for August 12, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. and that public notice should be published.and posted. Mayor Courtney then declared the meeting adjourned at 6:22 p.m. City Clerk t . FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA fFP/- � I. RECITALS A. Recitals and Statement of Authority. The Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council have previously approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, which established a tax increment financing district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, and have approved amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, designated as the "1985 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan' (the "1985 Amendments "), which supplement and amend the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area, as therein defined. This First Amendment to the 1985 Amendments to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan is established by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and this First Amendment is approved by such bodies pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462 and Sections 273.71 to 273.86. II. ENLARGEMENT OF 1985 PROJECT AREA The 1985 Project Area described in the 1985 Amendment is hereby amended to include therein the following property which is unimproved and located in the City: Tract 5: Those parts of Lots 11, 12 and 13, Block 1, Meadowlane II Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly and southwesterly of the centerline of York Avenue South. The above described property is presently owned by the City of Edina and it is anticipated that such property will be conveyed to the HRA. III. AMENDMENT OF SECTION III B.2. OF THE 1985 AMENDMENT Section III B.2. of the 1985 Amendment is hereby amended to read as follows: "2. Issuance of Bonds. The City has previously issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1981, dated October 1, 1981, in the total principal amount of $4,500,000 to finance the acquisition of the 1985 Project Area. It is presently expected that a portion of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project will be financed by the issuance of additional Bonds in one or more series in the principal amount of not greater than $12,000,000. Certain costs of the Interest Reduction Program will be undertaken in connection with the 1985 Project are not expected to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds and will be paid directly from Tax Increment derived from the District not needed to pay principal and interest on Bonds. The additional Bonds will be issued by the City or the HRA under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78." IV. AMENDMENT OF SECTION III B.3. OF THE 1985 AMENDMENT Section III B.3. of the 1985 Amendment is hereby amended to read as follows: "3. Bond Terms. The terms of the additional Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the additional Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 4. The additional Bonds will be in the principal amount of not greater than $12,000,000, will mature serially over a period of approximately 20 years, commencing on or after February 1, 1987, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing in 1986, and will be sold at public sale." CM ffkA-T- Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax.increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "). It has been proposed that the HRA approve additional amendments to the Plan designated as the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "First Amendment "). 2. The First Amendment is described in the document entitled "First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the First Amendment as so described is hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the 1985 Amendment as amended by the First Amendment. Attest: Dated this 19th day of August, 1985. Executive Director Chairman The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Commissioner , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director. -2- . j2 A- ffC CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE .SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN City: City of Edina, Minnesota Governing Body: City Council Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on August 19, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall. Members present: Members absent: Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SALE OF LAND TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the City in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City, and is a correct and complete copy of a resolution approved by the City Council at said meeting; and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given.as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this 19th day of August, 1985. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SALE OF LAND TO THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq., and a tax increment financing plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan established a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9 (the "District "). This Council and the HRA have previously approved amendments to the Plan designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "), which include, .among other things, the establishment of an interest reduction program under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.445, subdivision 11. The HRA has approved additional amendments to the Plan designated as the First Amendment to the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "First Amendment ") and has requested that this Council approve the First Amendment. This Council held a public hearing on the First Amendment on August 19, 1985, after notice of the public hearing was published in The Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on August 8, 1985, at which time all persons desiring to be heard on the subject were given an opportunity with respect thereto. 2. Approval. The First Amendment is hereby approved. 3. Findings Under the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the 1985 Project Area, as defined in the First Amendment would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The redevelopment plans for the 1985 Project Area as set forth in the 1985.Amendment as amended by the First Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the 1985 Project Area by private enterprise; and j (C) The 1985 Amendment as amended by the First Amendment conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 4. Tract 5 as described in the First Amendment is hereby authorized to be sold to the HRA for a price equal to $5.94 per square foot, and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute and deliver a quit claim deed to said Tract 5, in exchange for the sale price, and to execute and deliver such other documents, and to take such other action, as may be necessary or desirable to consummate such sale. 1985. Attest: Passed by the Council this 19th day of August, C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Marcella Daehn, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. :W= CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, August19, 1985, at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Meeting to review the design and construction schedule of Wooddale Park. This meeting has been called as a result of concern for the improvement of Wooddale Park. The park design is one of the original designs that were drawn for the park by BRW & Associates. Construction on the park will start in the fall of 1985. It is anticipated that the playground equipment and parking lot will be constructed by the winter of 1985 -86: Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Park and Recreation Department prior to the meeting or presented at the meeting itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Thank you. �I�YZ Bob Kojetin, 'rector Edina Park d Recreation Department BK:mk August 9, 1985 :frA- EDINA PARK BOARD August 12, 1985 7:30 p.m. Edina City Hall MEMBERS PRESENT: Joan Lonsbury, Robert Christianson, James Fee, Bill Lord, Andrew Montgomery, Mack Thayer, George Warner, Don Wineberg STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Eddie MacHolda, John Valliere, Larry Thayer, Madelyn Krinke Chairperson Joan Lonsbury called the meeting to order. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JULY 9, 1985 MEETING. Don Wineberg moved to approve the minutes of the July 9, 1985 meeting. Mack Thayer seconded the motion. Motion carried. II. WOODDALE SCHOOL Bob Kojetin presented and explained the proposed plan, Plan E from BRW Architects, which is the plan the Park ,Board had recommended previously to the Council. Mr. Kojetin explained that the usual procedure followed in developing any city park is to hire someone to do a plan of how a park may be constructed. The Park Board and staff must be concerned with how the plan fits into the total park system. Then this plan is submitted to the neighbors around the park for their input. Neighbor- hood input is important and so far, Mr. Kojetin said that two meetings have been held; one with a committee of neighbors and another with neighbors contiguous to Wooddale Park. These meetings were held for the purpose of obtaining input from the neighbors. Wooddale Park is some- what different because of how it was acquired, and how it is to be used and handled. Mr. Kojetin stated that at the directive of the council,the Park Department and other city staff had gone back over a lot of input which has been brought up over the last year. Bob Kojetin pointed out that funding was set aside already for developing the park so a lot of the work can be done right now. This is not the case with other parks which usually must be completed in stages over a number of years. Bob Kojetin explained that Plan E as recommended, is a starting point and that there were several options for specific plans using the Plan E as a guideline. He indicated that the Park Board would not address the issue of Utley Park since at an.earlier Park Board meeting it was indicated that there is currently no funding or plans to do work there. Bob stated the Park Board would need to discuss the number of parking spaces they feel is necessary for a park, depending upon what type of activities would take place in the park. The Park Department staff recommends a large open space 140''x 300' which could be used by younger children for such things as soccer, football, t -ball, but which would not r - 2 be scheduled for league games. A t -ball field would only need a small outfield, the main consideration being a large open space which could be used for younger children activities. The most logical area to develop for this purpose would seem to be where there is already irrigation in the current open space previously used for t- ball /soccer. T -ball and soccer could be scheduled at Wooddale if there were enough youngsters who sign up to create teams if the space is there. Bob Kojetin continued showing possible layouts of playground equipment areas, including a large tiny tot and regular playground equipment area with concrete curbing and sand in the middle. The tiny tot area could be separate from the older children's playground area by benches; therefore, be visible so that parents might be able to watch children playing in both areas at the same time. Bob Kojetin stated that he felt it would be necessary to provide some parking for people who drive to the park, and the staff agreed that 25 spaces would be adequate to accommodate the types of activities which he foresees being conducted there. Mr. Kojetin reported that the council had received a petition with 175 signatures representing 144 dwellings, requesting some type of skating rink in the park. He indicated that three rinks had been closed in the last five years and others had been downgraded because of lack of use by skaters. The trend in the last few years has been that hockey players and figure skaters seldom use outdoor ice because it is so unpredictable due to the weather. Mr. Kojetin stated that there is presently a committee studying the feasibility of another covered rink. Mr. Kojetin said the staff had discussed possibilities of a.rink at Wooddale Park in response to the petition. One possibility would be to flood a hard surface area which could be 100' x 100', so it could be used for hard court activities such as volleyball, basketball in the summer and an ice rink in the winter. Mr. Kojetin explained that it would be easier to make ice on a hard surface than on the ground, but that maintaining ice on an outdoor rink is very costly. He stated that he would not recommend any other type of rink than one for young children for recreational skating - no hockey boards or rink, nor would he put a warming house there with a restroom and an attendant. He would recommend some type of sun shelter for skate changing. Regarding fencing, Mr. Kojetin recommended some type of fencing on the south side, not parallel with the sidewalk, but create a larger boulevard area. He noted.that the wall on the north side of the park is crumbling and the fence would have to be replaced or repaired. Lighting would be similar to what is currently in the Country Club area along the east and south side of the park and the fence to Williams Park would be dismantled. Joan Lonsbury opened up the floor to discussion by the Park Board. Don Winberg asked whether this was the same plan as the one discussed in public meetings in the winter and if so why are there so many objections being raised now that we're not in the beginning. Bob Kojetin replied that it is the same plan with only a few modifications, including enlarging the playground area and adding a hard surface area, specifying 25 parking stalls, and removal of the walking path on the north and west. Mr. Kojetin said he has heard comments from residents about wanting a walking path completed all the way around the park and from others that do not want one. 3 Bob Christianson asked if the increased hard surface area is in response to the petition for an ice skating rink. Bob Kojetin replied yes. Bob Christianson asked how much the additional cost would be, and where the closest skating rinks are now. Bob Kojetin indicated that Arden and Weber are the closest. Bill Lord asked whether there would be a rink at Utley Park if there was one built at Wooddale. Mr. Kojetin replied that there would not be one at Utley, and he did not know if there could be one in Utley Park at all. Bob Christianson asked whether Mr. Kojetin knew how a hard surface would hold up if used for an ice rink, and how many years it would be before having to redo the surface. Mr. Kojetin wasn't sure how many years it would be, however he felt it would certainly have to be done more frequently if used for an ice rink, but the total cost factor would be offset by the lower cost of maintaining ice on a hard surface. Mr. Kojetin said if this concept were to be used, he would have to investigate it further. Don Wineberg asked how much the rink would be used if there was no warming house at the rink. Mr. Kojetin replied that we have about six (6) days in a normal winter when the weather conditions are ideal for skating and for ice making, which is 200 F by Weather Bureau statistics. Joan Lonsbury asked what the financial limitations are and how much money is available. Mr. Kojetin reported that $125,000 was transferred from the school to the city when the property was acquired, $100,000 from developers fund and $100,000 from the park capital budget which must be spread over the next four years at the rate of $25,000 per year. The amount used for the demolition, drawings and studies which have been done is $171,000, leaving about $150,000 for the park development this year and next year. Some rough estimates which Mr. Kojetin gave for development were $30- 35,000 for playground equipment, $35,000 for parking lot, $10-15,000 to rejuvenate the irrigation and introduce to another area, $40- 50,000 to build a hard surface for both winter and summer usage, $10- 15,000 for fencing and wall, and $15,000 for landscaping and trees. Joan Lonsbury opened the floor to comments from the residents. Mark Haymaker asked if the school has any right to take the site back if it is needed for a school in the future. Bob Christianson stated that the terms of transfer were that if the school deems that it needs the site for school purposes, it has the right to claim the site, and to the extent of the capital improvements to the facility, would have to repay the city. Mr. Haymaker expressed several other concerns 1) the concrete wall on the north side is crumbling and he would suggest a grass burm when it is redone, 2) if a tunnel was built under the bridge, he is concerned about security, how it would be policed at night, if it would be lit, how secure it would be, 3) parking lot issue - since private industry was not allowed to buy and use the site, he feels it is inappropriate that a church should have any influence on building a parking lot for their use, that if St. Stephens has a problem with parking, they should resolve the problem without using city property as a solution. After several comments from residents about wanting to discuss the parking lot issue, Bob Kojetin restated the City Council's directive to the Park Board to address the park as they see it, as a park only. 0 Mike Lewis expressed a concern about the access to the park being from Wooddale Avenue. Dave Duhaime requested that the Park Board give a strong opinion that 25 parking spaces is enough and is what the community wants. Pat Nelson stated that she felt that the parking lot is only being included to accommodate St. Stephens Church because the parking area which was at Wooddale School was only used by the church, and access from Wooddale Avenue would be very dangerous. Don Wineberg stated that experts were hired to study the best access to the park and the recommendation from them was to enter from Wooddale. Pam Griffin stated she felt there were very few cars using the parking lot at the park unless there was something going on at the church. She would like to see the park preserved as a natural setting and leave apparatus for the older children. George Psihos (4607 Wooddale) stated that he feels it is extremely important to make the park one for toddlers because there is nothing in that area for small children. He feels it is wrong to make a parking lot in the park because it would be taking away an opportunity to provide a park for children and would be catering to adults. Mr. Magnuson agreed there should be no parking lot and should be no walking path on the west side of the park. Charles Philipp agreed we should not provide a large number of parking spaces to be used by the church. Wendy Powell asked that they consider an overpass into Utley Park rather than an underpass because it is cleaner and safer for people to use. Joe Price wants to see the north fence left and burm put in. He also feels that the ratio of users on a skating rink at Wooddale would not justify the cost. Janie Paulus indicated that the residents near the Wooddale School were mostly under the impression that the school would be razed and then final plans would be made for development of the park and they were not aware that it would be done immediately after the demolition which is why they had not been expressing their concerns about park development previously. She feels that the park should be designed with the very young children as the primary influence because of the large numbers of K - 3rd graders in the area of the park, and that there should not be any parking lot. Marilyn Hoch stated that she had taught in Stillwater where they used a hard surface area and flooded for a skating rink in the winter and the surface was cracked and not useable for a play area most of the time because of the poor condition of the surface. Mike Lewis stated that he feels parking space in the park would be selling off park land for church parking. Jim Lofquist stated that traffic is going to create a serious hazard if there are two entrances to the park because he feels it will be used as a race way. Bob Kojetin referred Mr. Lofquist to the Traffice Safety Committee regarding a stop sign at the corner of Browndale and Country Club and one at Country Club and Wooddale. Kathy Stassen asked how the Park Board could give a recommendation to the council if they did not look at the Utley Park together with the Wooddale Park in regard to parking and the total park system. Bob Kojetin replied that there are no plans now to develop Utley Park and to leave it as it is, therefore it was not a consideration. There 5 was confusion about the number of parking spaces at Utley and proposed spaces by several of the residents. Bob Kojetin clarified that there is presently a total of 39 parking spaces. George Daravingas (4507 Drexel) stated that the people came to the Park Board meeting to discuss the recommendation the Board will give to the council, and that must include discussion about the parking lot. He asked that no parking lot be put in the park. Sally Kennedy repeated the need for a tot playground in the park, and that 42 parking spaces are too many. ANDY MONTGOMERY MADE A MOTION THAT PLAN E AS PRESENTED BE ACCEPTED WITH THE ENLARGED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND THAT THERE BE NO MORE THAN TWENTY -FIVE (25) PARKING SPACES. Motion seconced by Jim Fee. Discussion - Bob Christianson questioned the directive from the Council regarding the parking and access. Bob Kojetin stated that he understood that the parking issue would be decided by the council, but the Park Board should make a recommendation on what is needed based on the usage of the park, and that the park staff recommends 25 parking spaces for park usage. Mr. Kojetin further stated that it could be possible to change the recommendation of Plan E regarding access from Wooddale to access from 50th Street. Bob Christianson asked if a wading pool was included in this recommendation. Bob Kojetin replied that it was not. After further discussion regarding access, Bob Kojetin stated that BRW had chosen Wooddale Avenue as the access based on the volume of traffic on both 50th and Wooddale streets. George Warner commented that he feels that whenever a neighborhood park is developed, it is done for the use by all the people in Edina, not just that particular neighborhood and for that reason, there should be some type of parking provided in the park. Bill Lord said that because of limits of finances, he would like to see a priority list of what to do first in the park. Bob Kojetin stated that he would like to have a priority list made from input from the residents, and that the playground issue is probably the first priority to do; followed by grass and irrigation. Bob Christianson asked if the staff recommended the number of 25 parking spaces. Bob Kojetin and John Keprios responded yes, it was. John Keprios elaborated on the question - the park department recognizes that there was no parking area created at Arden Park and Todd Park and realize that it was a mistake not to do so and their recommendation for parking at Wooddale is based on past experience as well as on activities they foresee in the park. MOTION.PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. III. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - Club House Expansion Bob Kojetin presented the drawings of the planned expansion of the club house. Bob explained that bids would be going out in one week. The club house expansion will include a 200 seating capacity room on the south side, expansion of the Pro Shop, new office for managers and golf pro, new hallway on east side of building, new main enterance (into present building) and new expanded room. There will be a link between club house and pro shop so people do not have to walk outside. M On lower level a small expansion of the locker rooms. There would be .3 rooms; one for a men's lounge, one a ladies lounge, and a combination room for men and ladies. This room could be used for a conference room or to hold tournament special events. The ladies locker room would be changed to a new location and the old locker room would be incorporated to a golf cart storage area, under the expanded Pro shop /office; which would include a toilet and consession area. Bob Kojetin explained that the plans had been reviewed a number of times by people on the Golf Committee and staff and feels now that present plans and traffic patterns are satisfactory. Don Wineberg also commented on the number of people and reviews of different combinations of traffic patterns in the locker room facilities of the men and women. He indicated that the Golf Committee will meet again on Thursday, August 22 to see final plans. Don Wineberg moved to accept the plans as presented for the expansion of the club house. George Warner seconded and was passed unanimously. IV. BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE - Par 3 Expansion Bob Kojetin described the plans for the expansion of the par 3 course. The plans are the same as was ready for bid last winter. However, they now include State Aid for Braemar Boulevard by State Aid Project. This will allow Braemar Boulevard to be reconstructed to #2 tee. With State Aid, the par 3 course has a better finance package. Included in State Aid Road Project package are many storm water control and ponding areas, which are necessary for water movement in the area. These requirements would previously had to have been included in the construction of the par 3 course. The State has not approved the cost of a bridge as of yet, but hopefully they will. The new bridge across Braemar Boulevard would be 110' long and 10' wide. The cost of the bridge would be around $30,000 of which the State may pay 50% to 100 %. Other new improvements to Braemar Boulevard would include a curb and sidewalk on the south side of Braemar Boulevard. This sidewalk would be a continuation of the sidewalk on the South side of Dewey Hill Road. At the end of the sidewalk of the road improvement we could mark a large white line on the.road which would continue all the way around to the Golf Course Maintenance Building and connect to the present path. The fill from tees one and ten will be taken and placed onto Braemar Boulevard (approximately 6' high) for six months to compact the fill before use. Bob Kojetin added that the improvements to-the par 3 course will add a lot.to,Braemar Golf Course both financially and aesthetically. Bob Christiansen moved to accept the Par 3 Expansion plans as drawn. Don Wineberg seconded and was passed unanimously. V. FEES AND CHARGES Bob Kojetin presented the fees and charges for 1986. Bob explained that a one dollar increase on most programs is necessary to keep up with inflation. Bob also-explained that the Art Center fees and charges have not been established. Bob Christiansen moved to accept the fees and charges structure as presented . Bill Lord seconded and was passed unanimously. Meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Residents in attendance at Park Board Meeting August 18, 1985. Robert L. Meller Barbara Curry Steve & Sally Kenady Jane & Charles Paulus Jim Lofquist Pat Nelson Jane Fuegner Joe Price Terry O'Rourke Mike & Gail Lewis Wendy Powell George Psihos Diana Psihos Mary & Kim Haymaker Charles & Patricia Philipp Kathy Stassen Pat McMunn Joan Cornwell Janie Bennett (Mrs. G.F.) L. Magnuson Yngve Magnuson Jean Johnston George Johnston Marilyn Hoch Barbara Andrews George Daravingas Susan & David Duhaime Corky Weber Leonard Addington Kathryn Hagen Tom Anderson Griffity Hugh & Marilyn Jones Irene Joseph 4614 Moorland Ave. 4817 Upper Terrace 4605 Wooddale Ave. 4617 Moorland 4408 Country Club 4625 Drexel 5225 Kellogg 4407 Country Club 4600 Drexel 4601 Drexel 4612 Moorland 4607 Wooddale 4607 Wooddale 4605 Edina Blvd. 5 Eden Court 4406 Sunnyside 4503 Edina Blvd. 4905 Browndale 4901 Browndale 4909 Browndale 4909 Browndale 4516 Casco 4516 Casco 4510 Drexel 4512 Drexel 4507 Drexel 4401 Country Club 4303 Country Club • 4 Rd. 4305 Country Club Rd. 4603 Drexel Ave. 4603 Drexel Ave. *7 Edina Ct. 4905 Arden 4604 Moorland Ave. Corky K. Weber 4303 Country Club Road Edina, MN 55424 August 12, 1985 The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney 4313 Eton Place Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Courtney: I would like to take this opportunity to express my concern and the concern of the community regarding the Wooddale School and park situation. The concern in the neighborhood is the lack of green space for the new Wooddale park. With the planning of 42 parking spaces, as Mr. Ken Rosland stated at the last city council meeting, we feel that there will be limited green space to make the park compatible with the neighborhood. With the parking that is already planned at Utley Park, we cannot understand the need for 88 parking spaces at 'a neighborhood park. We also feel that adding the parking and an entrance from Wooddale, we would be creating even more traffic in our residential area. My alternative is to place the parking lot on the Southwest corner of 50th and Woodale where the additional traffic would not affect a residential area or an area where children play. The city also owns a full city lot on Wooddale and 50th on the Northeast corner. This is wasted space which could be converted to a parking lot for the needs of the church. It seems the major question is, are we building a play area for our children or are we building a parking lot in a residential neighborhood? I feel the concerns of the Edina residents should be considered before that of the city manager who wants a parking lot in a park where it does not belong. Sincerely, Corky Weber CKW /bw cc: Ken Rosland City Manager X774- IV 4 61 Ll� A 0 cc- C Pc4-c- 10 s sE,�.�,s G` pc,�, S s ck- pc>�t l �01- v 0, . 4 0 C4\ �C,�.�rik� �v (D c J�A- 4610 Edina Blvd. Edina, Mn. 55424 a City of Edina Edina, Mn. 55424 Mayor C.,Wayne.Courtney Dear Sir: We favor the 25 parking spaces recommended to meet the needs of Wooddale Park,so that the maximum usage of land be for park activities. The city of Edina must expend tax revenues for the development of an Edina park area directed �to meet the needs of the residents. At no !t ime should any religious organization be allowed to make contributions to the city in teturn for any preferential treatment(addtional parking spaces)not withstanding any previous precedence. As stated in our U.S.Constitution, the separation of church and state must be rigorously adhered to and jelously guarded. our city council may compromise many issues but never compromise principle. Sinderely your, 1 John and P/at Dill Edina residents for 25 years Fo Members of the Park Board, City Council, the Mayor and City Manager: As adjacent property o,,mArs at the Wooddale Park site we wish to make the -Following statements of consensus: 1. we consider a reasonable number of parking spaces a necessity and feel that number should not exceed 25 on the Wooddale site 2. we are opposed to any type of hockey rinki.e., boards built, high lights for evening skating 3. we favor priority use of the park for youngsters that are pre- school and lower elementary grades - -with emphasis on equipment that would encourage same 4. we are in favor of landscaping that enhances an open, flat area,shields the alley side of the park and disguises a fence along 50th that we think is needed in this city park due to heavy street traffic 5. we are in favor of a walkway on the perimeter of the park that would offer a groomed trail both winter and summer for walkers and runners however, we are not in favor of developing lots of seclusion and hidden areas along the walkway (i.e. Bredesen Park style) Thank you for your consideration and we appreciate your efforts to keep us informed and your willingness to consider our points of view. MI IRMI.F010 PIT � u � M WA =4 AS I IWAIM11 I 1 , ,r VI / / / FIR • 4502 Browndale Ave. Edina, Minnesota August 17, 1985 Members of The Council, City of Edina Minnesota Ladies and Gentlemen of The Council: Having lived in the Country Club neighborhood for 17 years and our three children having grown up in the Wooddale environs, we offer the following comments on the proposed park development: . We like the idea of having the 50th St. sidewalk going through the park. Edina needs some "built -in" nice public spaces. We cant always confine public space to concrete and asphalt. If some parents worry about strangers coming into the park then those children may be too young for unsupervised play. There really is not very much foot traffic on 50th Street. . LIGHTING Please include lighting for walkers, preferrably at a lower level of intensity. Light standards as used in Country Club would be consistent. Likewise, please do not use the orange, sodium vapor lighting. We hope that there will be no lighting for night games. . A "planted" fence of greenery would seem to be more attractive than the usual chain link or wood fence. . Parking Spaces: fewer Some have expressed interest in ice hockey facilities. I have observed that hockey tends to dominate a skating facility and is per - cieved as intimidating and overpowering to most other casual skaters. Flooding a playing field leads, sooner or later, to demands for .night lighting which, I , feel, is undesirable for a small neighborhood park adjacent private homes. Basically, we hope that this park will not be scheduled for Park Board games and that no bleecher seats will ever be installed alongside playing fields. Hopefully, this park will be for adults few amenities like a walking path through gardens would be very nice, aesthetically. make it a special place. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Robert J. De brey and mily as well as children. A trees, shrubs, and flower A sculpture or two would 4409 COUNTRY CLUB ROAD • EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 JT- To Council members and Mayor Courtney: Concerning the Wooddale Park: I just want to remind each of you that early this year a petition was presented to the council that contained the names of approxiamtely 500 residents of the Country club neighborhood. In that statement these neighborhood people asked that the building be razed and the space generated by the removal of the building be used for a neighborhood park. It was also a consensus of those 500 people that the green area be expanded to a maximum and the hard surfaces in the park be kept to a minimum. Therefore, it seems to follow that these people would surely endore less rather than more parking surface at the Wooddale Park. As a personal. statement I wish to say that I am very, very much opposed to the c0- mixing of funds from the church and city government. If the previous precedent has not been .challenged legally, I'm not sure that it follows that a precedent has indeed been set. I trust that you will give due consideration to 500 signatures. Sincerely, Mary Kluesner 4409 Country Club Road - f � (� � � � , � q-,r �c.i_� C� IYYI�tii.t..'VVI,�.�..'YVl t lam` c�CA "Sk GvL lK-�ti- n & t a S w�luh a � a d��-�� � a o -�Cc.)k -box. a5 Loo d rk . LLj Q CA, ri)CLQ- O4:X a CA cJ a U LLdLL cto 0m M k' C o�tit �l,b iAS 1.0 't"�- U` cQ•(tG�'�"� � �' O uJY1c� �� -Qsi. � !� -�-�U c��,,�L yes �s�tiv►1 C) wru-kb 5 Val cuu-'r kwm LL 0A KLQ-ij "LiLLA � '(�iY1 C �tn�c� �- � �-�'L e �tvwvwc.� +�'v►n �,t,�enax �- � �•ose. 4-�- AAAri.,ut.. ati�\ bam, mod` -.`-" 7L Svc :.- '� r'Y1 W cLA U1aC ez -kdA�L tf1'! b ° C-v t a7 ul .alllLGL't :;1 )GY R t -lam t 4 ,o &(J L n. tR �-Cll do CJ (Nw U c C3-,- s� •Y" azj Co vin Nen i.v t 1 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: August 16, 1985 TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Agenda item III. A. 1. Grandview Development Co. PRD -4 to PSR -4 Attached are the minutes from the Planning Commission July-31, 1985 meeting concerning the subject proposed, Our staff report and all other information submitted by the proponent are included in the notebook prepared by the developer. Please refer to section 10 for our staff report. + Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 1985 AT 7:30 P. M. MEMBERS PRESENT: John Bailey, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, W. W. Lewis, John Skagerberg, John Palmer, and Del Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Johnson, Virginia Shaw and Phil Sked STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES; Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes for the meeting of June 26, 1985. Mr. David Runyan Seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS: Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Craftsman Builders preliminary plat approval -of Interlachen Heights would be continued to the next Commission meeting of August 28, 1985. III. NEW BUSINESS; Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Corporation Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel) Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject property is a 3.5 acre site which is occupied by the closed Biltmore Motel. The Commission and Council approved a Planned Residential District (PRD -4) rezoning on the property in the fall of 1984 for the construction of an 88 unit, 4 story condominium project. A new development team has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning request for the purpose of constructing a seniors citizen rental apartment. The developers are requesting a rezoning to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5 and 6 story sections. The building would contain 70 one bedroom Page 2 units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms units. Exterior materials would be brick. Mr. Larsen added that the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2,500 square of lot area per unit in PSR -4 with the possibility of reducing this requirement to 1000 square feet per unit through a series of allowances. The proposed plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through credits for underground parking, type I or II construction, accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district. Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment building. Using graphics Mr. Larsen presented Ordinance requirements as they compare with the subject proposal: Unit Sizes Zoning Ordinance Subject Proposal 1 Bedroom 550 -650 S. F. 70 at 660 S. F. 700 for handicapped 2 Bedroom 750 -850 S. F. 33 at 795 S. F. 41 at 900 S. F. 3 Bedroom N.A. 8 @ 1,070 S. F. Community 152 units X 15 7,950 S. F. Spaces S. F. or 2,280 S.F. Mr. Larsen stated that a variance to Ordinance unit size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedrooms units would be necessary. Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the Ordinance requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25 space per unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking for a seniors residence. For a 152 unit building this results in 38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces and 51 surface spaces. the proponents have submitted an alternate plan illustrating 76 surface spaces and have suggested a proof of parking agreement which would add the additional spaces if needed. Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite the major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic Study for Link Road. No access to either west 52nd or 53rd streets is anticipated by the plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that in the Planned Residential District when building height exceeds 35 feet the setback required is equal to the height of the building. The Page 3 proposed building contains sections which are 36, 45, and 54 in height. Set backs corresponding to these heights have been provided. The design of the building provides for greater than minimum setbacks for much of the building. The PSR -4 district allows a maximum building coverage of 35 %. The proposed building would cover 21% which compares to 27% building coverage for the most recently approved condominium project on the site. Mr., Larsen commented that this concept is referred to as market rate elderly housing and is designed for a population of seniors who would not meet the income limits for other senior housing, and who desire a level of services not provided by more traditional housing alternatives. The proponents have commissioned a market study to determine the demand for this type of housing in Edina. Mr. Larsen added that there are several land use issues that need to be addressed concerning this proposal. The first issue is height. Mr. Larsen explained that the building contains 4, 5, and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45, and 54 feet. This compares to 4 stories and a uniform height of 40 feet for the 88 unit building approved for the site. The architect has chosen to provide a building which is broken down into three main units of varied height to reduce the monotony and to add visual interest to the building. We believe they have succeeded and have created a more appealing building than the previous plan. Properties most impacted by the building's height are to the west along Grandview Lane. Set backs along this line vary from 40 to 90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier plan. The increased height allows a reduction in building coverage which results in increased landscaped areas. The proponents contend that the building height results, at least partially, from the need to have a compact building foot print, allowing shorter corridors and a more efficient delivery of services. Mr. Larsen addressed the Zoning issue stating that the City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. These projects are required to rent only to seniors for the full 40 year term of their mortgage. The buildings contain primarily one bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms units, and because of income limits for tenants automobile ownership is limited. Since this project would not be controlled by HUD it would be necessary for the City /HRA to limit occupancy. Staff believes this could be accomplished through a redevelopment contract and deed restrictions. Page 4 Mr. Larsen further added that the Zoning Ordinance responded to senior citizens housing by taking the unit sizes that the Federal Government stipulated and incorporating them into the ordinance. This was intended to eliminate the need for variances. The developers contend that their experience indicates a need to offer slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD projects would allow. The one bedroom, one bedroom plus den units (considered here as a two bedroom), and 2 bedroom units are within or very near our Ordinance requirements. The three bedrooms units would not be allowed. The proponents claim that the target market demands larger units with more bedroom options. Staff supports a variance to allow the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City can exercise control over building occupancy. Mr. Larsen pointed out that staffs major concern is parking and traffic. The Ordinance requires .75 parking space per unit. .25 of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4 District. The subject proposal would provide .84 space per unit .5 of which would be enclosed. the most comparable existing project in the City would seem to be 7500 York. Parking provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the subject proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of which is enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will provide a total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per unit enclosed. Staff conversations with management at 7500 York indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting list for enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase in the amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking agreement for surface parking. The proponents have hired BRW, Inc. to examine the traffic impact of the development. Staff would suggest that the entry from Vernon be redesigned at a right angle to Vernon. Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed location is shown in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for elderly housing, and in staffs' opinion represents an excellent reuse of this property. Mr. Larsen further stated that staff recommends approval of the preliminary development plan with an increase in enclosed parkin to .7 per unit, the granting of the unit size variances, surface parking variances and proof of parking agreement. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that Mr. Dunbar held a public meeting on July 29, 1985 regarding this project. At this time Mr. Dunbar was invited to make a presentation of his development plan. Mr. Dunbar began his presentation by explaining to the Commission that.the proposed development project is market driven. Mr. Dunbar further added that the Grandview Page 5 Development Team felt there should be no outside influence describing to them what the market should be; therefore, Grandview Development has opted not to take any federal regulations on this project. This would allow the project to be designed strictly to appeal to the market place. Mr. Dunbar proceeded to introduce to the Commission members of the Grandview Development Team. Mr. Wayne Winsor of Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., Ms. Patricia A. McCullough of Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc., and Mr. Peter Van Hauer of Health Central Enterprises. Mr. Winsor, Ms. McCullough and Mr. Van Hauer gave a brief presentation of their expertise in relationship to the proposed development project. Commission members directed questions to the Grandview Development Team. William Lewis inquired as to whether there are any facilities like the proposed facility in the metro area. Mr. Van Hauer replied that at the present time there are no facilities exactly like the proposed facility. The difference is that the proposed facility is rental. Other facilities offer similar services but are condominiums or cooperative projects. Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Van Hauer if Health Central had experience in the management of facilities similar to the proposed facility. Mr. Van Hauer told the Commission that Health Central manages 1 project on Lake Shore Drive, 3 HUD projects, and will manage 2 other facilities when they are completed. Mr. Runyan questioned Mr. Van Hauer on the definition of "On Call Nursing ". Mr. Van Hauer explained that all units would be equipped with pull cords, most likely placed in the bathroom and master bedroom. If the need would arise for quick medical attention the tenant could alert staff. The staff would be trained for emergency situations; administering CPR etc. Mr. Van Hauer further added that the trained staff are not meant to be a substitute for Police, Fire or other trained emergency personnel. Helen McClelland and David Runyan inquired about rental rates for the project. Mr. Dunbar informed the Commission that a set rate has not been decided on. Mr. Dunbar added that he realizes they have to be market competitive and he is waiting for results of a survey that addresses the rent issue. Mr. Dunbar commented that after a preliminary analysis he felt the rates would most likely be in the price range of $800.00 on up. A brief discussion ensued on if meals would be included in the rental price of the unit. Ms. MCcullough stated that they are looking for a minimum of one meal a day but they have not yet defined how to implement the cost. Ms. McCullough said she is waiting for the market research questionnaire to come back. Ms. Page 6 McCullough added that she felt for the first few years the meals would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that that would mean that each renter would have a small monthly fee of $10.00 - $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additional meal fee. Ms. Mccullough added that the figure would probably be closer to $30.00. Helen McClelland questioned whether or not the units would be handicap accessible. Ms. McCullough stated that units would be handicap accessible. Helen McClelland asked if the age of 75+ was a firm requirement for rental and what would happen if someone became ill and needed to be hospitalized for a period of time. Ms. McCullough explained that the 75+ is an average age quote. Rental can began at age 55 +. In regard to the health issue The Grandview Team hopes to develop a occupancy criteria that would address that issue. David Runyan asked Fran Hoffman if traffic signals would be constructed at the site. Mr. Hoffman stated that the City had targeted this area to be signalized and have sidewalks put in. Mr. Dunbar recapped his meeting with the neighborhood by informing the Commission that most residents were comfortable with the proposed development and expressed their belief that the Grandview Team was competent. They also expressed there dissatisfaction with the present site and were satisfied that the proposed development would add to the community. John Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re- zoning. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. -7 Gustafson and Assoc. Approval Indian Hill Lots 1 -15, Block of 11, Block 1 e Generally Located: h Crosst of on Road Pre ,J&Orinary Plat Addition ndian Hills 2nd. Timbers own Highway and West Mr. Larsen in d the Commission t the City Council granted fi plat approval to India 'lls 2nd Addition in Apr' 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots along McCaule rail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de sac extending h from McCauley Trail. Since that time the s r ? N t r MX-1-r- t s` i N U M B E R Z -85 -3 Dunbar Development Corp. L O C A T 10 N 5212 Vernon Avenue; Lots 1, 2, 3, E 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of W. 52nd Street. REQUEST PSR -4, Plan Amendment EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, JULY 31, 1985 AT 7:30 P. M. MEMBERS PRESENT:. John Bailey, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, W. W. Lewis, John Skagerberg, John Palmer, and Del Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Johnson, Virginia Shaw and Phil Sked STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES; Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of the minutes for the meeting of June 26, 1985. Mr. David Runyan Seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS: Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Craftsman Builders preliminary plat approval of Interlachen Heights would be continued to the next Commission meeting of August 28, 1985. III. NEW BUSINESS; Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Corporation Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel) Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject property is a 3.5 acre site which is occupied by the closed Biltmore Motel. The Commission and Council approved a Planned Residential District (PRD -4) rezoning on the property in the fall of 1984 for the construction of an 88 unit, 4 story condominium project. A new development team has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning request for the purpose of constructing a seniors citizen rental apartment. The developers are requesting a rezoning to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5 and 6 story sections. The building would contain 70 one bedroom Page 2 units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms units. Exterior materials would be brick. Mr. Larsen added that the Zoning Ordinance requires a' minimum of 2,500 square of lot area per unit in PSR -4 with the possibility of reducing this requirement to 1000 square feet per unit through a series of allowances. The proposed plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through credits for underground parking, type I or II construction, accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district. Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment building. Using graphics Mr. Larsen presented Ordinance requirements as they compare with the subject proposal: Unit Sizes Zoning Ordinance Subject Proposal 1 Bedroom 550 -650 S. F. 70 at 660 S. F. 700 for handicapped 2 Bedroom 750 -850 S. F. 33 at 795 S. F. 41 at 900 S. F. 3 Bedroom N.A. 8 @ 1,070 S. F. Community 152 units X 15 7,950 S. F. Spaces S. F. or 2,280 S.F. Mr. Larsen stated that a variance to Ordinance unit size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedrooms units would be necessary. Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the Ordinance requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25 space per unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking for a seniors residence. For a 152 unit building this results in 38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces -and 51 surface spaces. the proponents have submitted an alternate plan illustrating 76 surface spaces and have suggested a proof of parking agreement which would add the additional spaces if needed. Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite the major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic Study for Link Road. No access to either west 52nd or 53rd streets is anticipated by the plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that in the Planned Residential District when building height exceeds 35 feet the setback required is equal to the height of the building. The Page 3 proposed building contains sections which are 36, 45, and 54 in height. Set backs corresponding to these heights have been provided. The design of the building provides for greater than minimum setbacks for much of the building. The PSR -4 district allows a maximum building coverage of 350. The proposed building would cover 21% which compares to 27% building coverage for the most recently approved condominium project on the site. Mr. Larsen commented that this concept is referred to as market rate elderly housing and is designed for a population of seniors who would not meet the income limits for other senior housing, and who desire a level of services not provided by more traditional housing alternatives. The proponents have commissioned a market study to determine the demand for this type of housing in Edina. Mr. Larsen added that there are several land use issues that need to be addressed concerning this proposal. The first issue is height. Mr. Larsen explained that the building contains 4, 5, and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45, and 54 feet. This compares to 4 stories and a uniform height of 40 feet for the 88 unit building approved for the site. The architect has chosen to provide a building.which is broken down into three main units of varied height to reduce the monotony and to add visual interest to the building. We believe they have succeeded and have created a more appealing building than the previous plan. Properties most impacted by the building's height are to the west along Grandview Lane. Set backs along this line vary from 40 to 90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier plan. The increased height allows a reduction in building coverage which results in increased landscaped areas. The proponents contend that the building height results, at least partially, from the need to have a compact building foot print, allowing shorter corridors and a more efficient delivery of services. Mr. Larsen addressed the Zoning issue stating that the City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. These projects are required to.rent only to seniors for the full 40 year term of their mortgage. The buildings contain primarily one bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms units, and because of income limits for tenants automobile ownership is limited. Since this project would not be controlled by HUD it would be necessary for the City /HRA to limit occupancy. Staff believes this could be accomplished through a redevelopment contract and deed restrictions. Page 4 Mr. Larsen further added that the Zoning Ordinance responded to senior citizens housing by taking the unit sizes that the Federal Government stipulated and incorporating them into the ordinance. This was intended to eliminate the need for variances. The developers contend that their experience indicates a need to offer slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD projects would allow. The one bedroom, one bedroom plus den units (considered here as a two bedroom), and 2 bedroom units are within or very near our Ordinance requirements. The three .bedrooms units would not be allowed. The proponents claim that the target market demands larger units with more bedroom options. Staff supports a variance to allow the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City can exercise control over building occupancy. Mr. Larsen pointed out that staffs major concern is parking and traffic. The Ordinance requires .75 parking space per unit. .25 of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4 District. The subject proposal would provide .84 space per unit .5 of which would be enclosed. the most comparable existing project in the City would seem to be 7500 York. Parking provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the subject proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of which is enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will provide a total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per unit enclosed. Staff conversations with management at 7500 York indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting list for enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase in the amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking agreement for surface parking. The proponents have hired BRW, Inc. to examine the traffic impact of the development. Staff would suggest that the entry from Vernon be redesigned at a right angle to Vernon. Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed location is shown in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for elderly housing, and in staffs' opinion represents an excellent reuse of this property. Mr. Larsen further stated that staff recommends approval.of the preliminary development plan with an increase in enclosed parkin to .7 per unit, the granting of the unit size variances, surface parking variances and proof of parking agreement. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that Mr. Dunbar held a public. meeting on July 29, 1985 regarding this project. At this time Mr. Dunbar was invited to make a presentation of his development plan. Mr. Dunbar began his presentation by explaining to the Commission that the proposed development project is market driven. Mr. Dunbar further added that the Grandview Page 5 Development Team felt there should be no outside influence describing to them what the market should be; therefore, Grandview Development has opted not to take any federal regulations on this project. This would allow the project to be designed strictly to appeal to the market place. Mr. Dunbar proceeded to introduce to the Commission members of the Grandview Development Team. Mr. Wayne Winsor of Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., Ms. Patricia A. McCullough of Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc., and Mr. Peter Van Hauer of Health Central Enterprises. Mr. Winsor, Ms. McCullough and Mr. Van Hauer gave a brief presentation of their expertise in relationship to the proposed development project. Commission members directed questions to the Grandview Development Team. William Lewis inquired as to whether there are any facilities like the proposed facility in the metro area. Mr. Van Hauer replied that at the present time there are no facilities exactly like the proposed facility. The difference is that the proposed facility is rental. Other facilities offer similar services but are condominiums or cooperative projects. Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Van Hauer if Health Central had experience in the management of facilities similar to the proposed facility. Mr. Van Hauer told the Commission that Health Central manages 1 project on Lake Shore Drive, 3 HUD projects, and will manage 2 other facilities when they are completed. Mr. Runyan questioned Mr. Van Hauer on the definition of "On Call Nursing ". Mr. Van Hauer explained that all units would be equipped with pull cords, most likely placed in the bathroom and master bedroom. If the need would arise for quick medical attention the tenant could alert staff. The staff would be trained for emergency situations; administering CPR etc. Mr. Van Hauer further added that the trained staff are not meant to be a substitute for Police, Fire or other trained emergency personnel. Helen McClelland and David Runyan inquired about rental rates for the project. Mr. Dunbar informed the Commission that a set rate has not been decided on. Mr. Dunbar -added that he realizes they have to be market competitive and he is waiting for results of a survey that addresses the rent issue. Mr. Dunbar commented that after a preliminary analysis he felt the rates would most likely be in the price range of $800.00 on up. A brief discussion ensued on if meals would be included in the rental price of the unit. Ms. MCcullough stated that they are looking for a minimum of one meal a day but they have not yet defined how to implement the cost. Ms. McCullough said she is waiting for the market research questionnaire to come back. Ms. Page 6 McCullough added that she felt for the first few years the meals would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that that would mean that each renter would have a small monthly fee of $10.00- $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additional meal fee. Ms. Mccullough added that the figure would probably be closer to $30.00. Helen McClelland questioned whether or not the units would be handicap accessible. Ms. McCullough stated that units would be handicap accessible. Helen McClelland asked if the age of 75+ was a firm requirement for rental and what would happen if someone became ill and needed to be hospitalized for a period of time. Ms. McCullough explained that the 75+ is an average age quote. Rental can began at age 55 +. In regard to the health issue The Grandview Team hopes to develop a occupancy criteria that would address that issue. David Runyan asked Fran Hoffman if traffic signals would be constructed at the site. Mr. Hoffman stated that the City had targeted this area to be signalized and have sidewalks put in. Mr. Dunbar recapped his meeting with the neighborhood by informing the Commission that most residents were comfortable with the proposed development and expressed their belief that the Grandview Team was competent. They also expressed there dissatisfaction with the present site and were satisfied that the proposed development would add to the community. John Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re- zoning. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. -85 -7 Gustafson and A c. Preliminary Plat Approval India Hills 3rd Addition Lots 1 -15, B1 k 1, Indian Hills 2nd. Lot 11, Blo 1, The Timbers Generally Located: ou of Crosstown Highway and West o eason Road Mr. Larsen infor d the Commiss that the City Council granted fin plat approval to ian Hills 2nd Addition in April, 985. The plat consist of 7 R -2 lots along McCauley T it and 8 R -1 lots on a new 1 de sac extending sou from McCauley Trail. Since th t time the COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 31, 1985. Z -85 -3 Dunbar Development Corporation Planned Residential District, PRD -4 to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 Refer to: Attached preliminary plans, letters from developer and architect, November 1984 Site Plan Generally Located: West of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street (Biltmore Motel) The subject property is a 3.5 acre site which is occupied by the closed Biltmore Motel. The Commission and Council approved a Planned Residential District (PRD -4) rezoning on the property in the fall of 1984 for the construction of an 88 unit, 4 story condominium project. A new development team has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning request for the purpose of constructing a seniors citizen rental apartment. The developers are requesting a rezoning to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the construction of a 152 unit building containing 4,5 and 6 story sections. The building would contain 70 one bedroom units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedrooms units. Exterior materials would be brick. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of 2,500, square of lot area per unit. in PSR -4 with the possibility of reducing this requirement to 1000 square feet per unit through a series of allowances. The proposed plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through credits for underground parking, type I or II construction, accessibility to freeways, and for providing senior citizen units. As a result the density as proposed conforms to Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district. The Zoning Ordinance establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment building. Listed below are rage z Ordinance requirements as they compare with the subject proposal: Unit Sizes Zoning Ordinance Subject Proposal 1 Bedroom 550 -650 S. F. 70 at 660 S. F. 700 for handicapped 2 Bedroom 750 -850 S. F. 33 at -795 S. F. 41 at 900 S. F. 3 Bedroom N.A. 8 @ 1,070 S. F. Community 152 units X 15 7,950 S. F. Spaces S. F. or 2,280 S.F. A variance to Ordinance unit size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedrooms units would be necessary. The Ordinance requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25 space per unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking for a seniors residence. For a 152 unit building this results in 38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces and 51 surface spaces. the proponents have submitted an alternate plan illustrating 76 surface spaces and have suggested a proof of parking agreement which would add the additional spaces if needed. Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite the major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic Study for Link Road. No access to either west 52nd or 53rd streets is anticipated by the plan.- In the Planned Residential District when building height exceeds 35 feet the setback required is equal to the height of the building. The proposed building contains sections which are 36, 45, and 54 in height. Set backs corresponding to these heights have been provided. The design of the building provides for greater than minimum setbacks for much of the building. The PSR -4 district allows a maximum building coverage of 35 %. The proposed building would cover 21% which compares to 27% building coverage for the most recently approved condominium project on the site. The first floor of the building would house a variety of services including.congregate dining for the residents. The attached letter from the project architect details the uses and their respective sizes. The subject property is in the Grandview Area Tax Increment District. The tax increment district allows the HRA the ability to offer financial incentives and assistance Page 3 . in order to gain desired redevelopment projects. In this case the developer is requesting capital assistance in the amount of $1,000,000 for the project. This request will be considered by the City's HRA in the near future. Recommendation: The subject proposal represents a relatively new concept in seniors housing. It is not intended to replace the more familiar HUD type subsidized project, but is intended to serve.a different market. The building would offer a high level of services to residents including on call nursing and emergency medical assistance. The concept is referred to as market rate elderly housing and is designed for a population of seniors who would not meet the income limits for other senior housing, and who desire a level of services not provided by more traditional housing alternatives. The proponents have commissioned a market study to determine the demand for this type of housing in Edina. There are several land use issues that need to be addressed concerning this proposal. Height: The building contains 4, 5, and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45, and 54 feet. This compares to 4 stories and a uniform height of 40 feet for the 88 unit building approved for the site. The architect has chosen to provide a building which is broken down into three main units of varied height to reduce the monotony and to add visual interest to the building. We believe they have succeeded and have created a more appealing building than the previous plan. Properties most impacted by the building's height are to the west along Grandview Lane. Set backs along this line vary from 40 to 90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier plan. The increased height allows a.reduction in building coverage which results in increased landscaped areas. The proponents contend that the building height results, at least partially, from the need to have a compact building foot print, allowing shorter corridors and a more efficient delivery of services. Seniors Residence Zoning: The City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to HUD requirements for Section 202 projects. these projects are required to rent only to seniors for the full 40 year term of their mortgage. The buildings contain primarily one bedroom with a limited number of two bedrooms units, and because of income limits for tenants automobile ownership is limited. Since this project would not be controlled by HUD it would be necessary for the City /HRA to Page 4 limit occupancy. Staff believes this could be accomplished through a redevelopment contract and deed restrictions. Unit Sizes:' The developers contend that their experience indicates a need to offer slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD projects would allow. The one bedroom, one bedroom plus den units (considered here as a two bedroom), and 2 bedroom units are within or very near our Ordinance requirements. The three bedrooms units would not be allowed. The proponents claim that the target market demands larger units with more bedroom options. Staff supports a variance to allow the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City can exercise control over building occupancy. Parking and Traffic: The Ordinance requires .75 parking space per unit. .25 of which must be enclosed in the PSR -4 District. The subject proposal would provide .84 space per unit .5 of which would be enclosed. the most comparable existing project in the City would seem to be 7580 York. Parking provided at 7500 York is nearly identical to the subject proposal with a total parking ratio of .82, .47 of which is enclosed. The elderly building at Edinbourgh will provide a total of 1.01 spaces per unit with .7 spaces per unit enclosed. .Staff conversations with management at 7500 York indicate a surplus of surface parking and a waiting list for enclosed parking. Staff would suggest an increase in the amount of enclosed parking and a proof of parking agreement for surface parking. The proponents have stated their intention to have BRW, Inc. examine the traffic impact of the development. Staff would suggest that the entry,from Vernon be redesigned at a right angle to Vernon. Conclusion: The proposed location is shown in the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for elderly housing, and in staffs' opinion represents an excellent reuse of this property. However, our support of the proposal is conditioned upon satisfactory answers to the concerns raised in this report. Further, since we have not analyzed the request for assistance by the HRA for the development we make no comment or commitment at this time. ``, V O P 2Q V N 3 0 3 F W (A Q Z o. PHASE ONE 1 FLOOR PLAN Wool 52nd Street PHASE ONE 1 7 I C2 L..M A } B S CI I e2 '_ 111 S S I E. I I. I d N B C1 C2 D F ' CL ♦Lrr •LHr I.LM •Lever fLtMr ok.rei E ,C1 � rNaa JE HZ �LOr ec� /roo 1 /rfe' /lr6 I /w I. ,- I /row �_� I I r •3 5- rrra L 159. l nwwe / FARKINO roeutred Provided L.vfx/r;4,. /i Me nw. /C' Weet 53rd Street -�-tc a x , ,7Lr /�o• PLAN FLOORS 2 - 5 SITE PLAN •e I�fff+gyf,cIT/1f ailll I. K VERNON HILL CONDOMINIUMS /nr ..lah4wr hZ�rN= RESTUDY r._ •F: .�j • R < � ii nj'f ��7, -�, r: � h�'i i �, �tjj� ~� �l� �i�l.y Lt i:k-�i PARKING g`L� 61 CARS ♦c" AF` 1� rfj SG• ' �e tl J � •f �'f•'�r,: % '11'., "''� %�:� ,-i ✓�c - L Sid • /6V BENIOR! NOU61N0 .,ref 5 `ti L - ~%• A cc !' •.( -' S � ReA r �-�- -a y, %I r ` .i �vy�• } • �,�i. gee': f+ � `� NT rC �iif.J'! rj' � ��. `p. rf''�� �, 'r,ry. � •'�L' i� _,� x• Kiln,i it -z i ,-i ' �" / ^�, I . '�' ;� {NI ty• � -�• ';�v% '."-`L`'� ,.j `� •_�✓ .: h go � • •;i t'X% ��: :: �1+- "'.,'I. R�:: e f ��. e.l - I! tq� .� f..,�F yi.. .1 ,t , . / � ,- /.' _ t�.- � �1:, �� Y1 / (�. 4 J i�1.1 ,cw. I rCr•�i c% i�c - . L r ;�. i �' Y Winsor /FaricyArchitects Inc. Sc"" PfolPct- - - - - -- -- ---------------------- - - - - -- s�n�llt, Date 1-17-815 Seniors Congregate Housing' SITE PLAN. 5—]n, 79. ,.F Suw' D1nwn B Srm vrW.4mmr.nu 65If17 Y 611171 fe% Proj. No 6310 -860- 1 Edina, Minnesota for GRANDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO: na , FLOOR t GARAGE LEVEL 0 20 e0 ru—Lj---1 _ 0 10 30 Winsor /FaricyArchitects,Inc Da "1e 7-17 - Rove °1 - - — _ S,��Nr. 5 ... VS, mow.., r.r,.5,,.� Dare ,_ „_es Seniors Congregate Housing s.�i a.d. u.w.�ueeim Drawn By 012 tnow Prof No. 0310 -000 -1 Edina, Minnesota- for GRANDVIEW DIVILOPMINT CO. 6 MmE6 16D 78D ff :!: L '2 It.D 1190 F- 11 0 FLOOR 9 FLOOR 5 ' FLOORS 2.3.4 �� 66 ^20 60 ^ 1 U L- I 0 10 30 WinsodFaricyArchitects,lnc. Scale 1':30'-0' Date Project -- --- Seniors Congregate Housing -- -- -- Shot IJo S—, aN.. .n ,. S Sv.e� s.,nv.a.r+m�n.ussim , -„ -86 Di awn By 012 mass Pro[No 6310 -660 -1 8111118, Nlnnoeoto for ONANDVIEW DEVELOPMENT CO. Dunbar Development Corporation July 17, 1985 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: A Development Proposal for the Biltmore Site Dear Mr. Rosland: We are pleased to submit to the City of Edina, for its consideration, a development proposal to address a market need within the community for Assisted Living apartment units. Our proposal which is located in the Grandview Redevelopment District on the property known. as the Biltmore Site would consist,of 152. Assisted Living Apartment Units. This development concept is directly aimed at a market segment which is seeking a housing alternative that complements their living style and needs. Also, it provides the support services which are needed at this state of their life. They could stay in their single family homes, but if provided the proper location, amenity package, and quality building, would opt to relocate to such a facility. This would then recycle the single family housing stock within the community. Such a project would permit the seniors to stay within the neighborhood, community, and social affiliations which they have had for years. In addition, it would provide for a secure living environment, with direct accessibility to support services within the building or through the management affiliation of Health Central Corporation. We have attached as Exhibit "A ", a further elaboration on the concept which has been developed by Health Central Corporation, an active member of our development team and a member which brings to the team, a strong and long -term history )f participation in health care and senior housing facilities. 5353 Gamble Drive Suite 311 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 (612) 593 -5014 Mr. Kenneth Rosland July 17, 1985 Page - 2 Exhibit "B" is a design concept developed by Winsor /Faricy Architects in consultation with Health Central Corporation. We believe this concept addresses the market in a positive design approach and reflects the functional needs of the residents. We are designing the project with more usable open space and greater building sets backs than exist presently. Winsor /Faricy has an impressive history in residential design and is a valuable member of our team. The development would cost approximately $12,815,000. This budget would provide for the proper development program necessary to meet the market with the type of services and support which has been expressed in the Health Central portion of this presentation. Exhibit "C" provides a complete breakdown of the application of funds. The affordability of the units and services to the residents are central factors which must be addressed. _ The project must meet the needs of the residents while maintaining a rent level which is acceptable to the market. The residents of the development will be at a stage in life where they have fixed incomes or fixed asset bases as the sole support for their remaining life. We must provide this development at an acceptable economic level to allow the residents to retain their living independence and pride. To properly address this market nitch and to provide a facility that is acceptable in the marketplace in the City of Edina, we request participation by the City to be applied toward capital development cost for the project. We request City participation in the amount of $1,000,000. It is our belief that the development can repay this source of fund by Tax Increment within a reasonable time which will justify the community involvement in this project. Preliminary projections indicate a pay back in less than the traditional 20 years. This development addresses directly the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan created by the City of Edina on May 30, 1984 and related specifically to the objectives for the 'Biltmore site. Listed below are some of the factors that would justify the City's support for the project and the public purp -se substantiating the City's participation. 1. It provides a housing alternative for a segment of the Edina Market, thus permitting those people to remain within Edina. Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Page - 3 July 17, 1985 2. It addresses precisely the goals and objectives in the Land Use Planning sections, established by the City, for the Grandview Redevelopment Area. 3. It is a development that does not compete with the existing senior housing projects that are being constructed within the City and the surrounding communities because it focuses on a nitch of the market place different from those developments. It is not luxurious, but is on the upper scale of market rate units. 4. It provides the initial development project which t,ien realizes the economic and development objectives established within the development the development district plan. 5. It revitalizes a currently nonproductive site into a site that produces not only a significant tax base and quality housing, but further has a beneficial ripple effect of being the basis for creating the momentum for additional revitalization within the redevelopment district. 6. It increases the tax base within the community. The development team consists of: SPONSOR /DEVELOPER MARKETING, MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT ARCHITECTS LEGAL COUNSEL Grandview Development Company c/o Dunbar Development Corporation 5353 Gamble Drive, Suite 311 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Telephone Number: 593 -5014 Health Central Corporation 2810 57th Avenue North Minneapolis, Minnesota 55430 Telephone Number: 574 -7800 Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc. 28 West Fifth Street, Suite 375 St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Telephone Number: 227 -0655 Holmes and Graven 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone Number: 338 -1177 Mr. Kenneth Rosland July 17, 1985 Page - 4 LEGAL (con't) MARKET RESEARCH CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT Thomsen, Nybeck, Johnson, Bouquet & Van Valkenburg, P.A. 7250 France Avenue South, Suite 102 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 Telephone Number: 835 -7000 Health Planning & Management Resources, Inc. 4970 Lincoln Drive Edina, Minnesota 55436 Telephone Number: 935 -6077 Johnson Building Company 1020 Southdale Office Plaza Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 Telephone Number: 831 -8777 (See Exhibit D for Biographical Information) SUGGESTED DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE July /August, 1985 Presentation of Concept to the City of Edina July 29, 1985 Neighborhood Meeting July 31, 1985 Presentation at'Planning Commission Sept. /Oct., 1985 Finalized Redevelopment Contract Finalized Drawings Secure Financing Confirm Design Drawings. October,'1985 Receive Final City Approval November, 1985 Commence Construction of the Project Winter 1986/1987 Ready for Occupancy. Mr. Kenneth Rosland July 17, 1985 Page - 5 In summary, the project needs, and thus our request to the City of Edina is as follows: 1. Rezone the property to the SR -4 Classification to permit the apartment complex to be built. 2. Authorize us to enter in to a redevelopment contract with the City of Edina, wherein we commit to construct a facility as presented herein and the City provides $11000,000 of tax increment financed funds, or alternative sources of financial participation. to assist the economic feasibility of the project. We recognize the need for discussions regarding many factors of this proposal and are prepared to continue our meetings with the City Staff in order to arrive at an acceptable and marketable development which will be a credit to the community. We are very much aware of the concerns of the neighborhood regarding the current condition of the property and will arrange for its destruction as soon as we can implement this in development proposal. Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We will submit a supplement on July 17, 1985 for review' by the Planning Commission on July 31, 1985. We look forward with tremendous optimism to working with the City of Edina and developing this project within the Grandview Redevelopment Plan District. Should you have any question or need clarification on any of the material submitted, we would be pleased to meet at your convenience to discuss or elaborate on any item. Sincerely, Frank C. Dunbar Dunbar Development Corporation FCD:nr cc: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager Craig Larson, City Planner 2810 Fifty- Seventh Avenue North • Minneapolis MN 55430 -2496 612/574 -7800 THE HEALTH CENTRAL CORPORATION 00 O Zw With 5,000 Americans turning 65 each day, the market for retirement housing is rapidly growing. Experts predict housing for the elderly will boom in the late 1980s and the 1990s the way housing for the singles boomed in the 1970s and early 180s. The number of Americans 65 and older is growing at an unprecedented rate and their houses no longer suit their lifestyles driven by substantial improvements in overall health and favorable income levels. Consider these facts: o Human life expectancy has increased from 48 years at the turn of the century to the current 82 years. • It is expected that from 1980 to 1990 the number of people 65 years of age and older will increase by more than six million, accounting for more than one quarter of the United States population's growth. • Today the elderly comprise over 11% of the population. o In 1990, nearly 32 million will be age 65 or older with the 85 and over group doubling its present size. GROWTH IN THE NUMBERS OF ELDERLY ■ The elderly population is projected to grow dramatically as a proportion of the total U.S. population. I PROJECTED PERCENT CHANGES_ l9Rn_1999 1 Total Population CS. Age Under 65 115.2% Age 65-74 113.5% Age 75-84 47.9% Source: U.S. Bureau of Census All these facts and figures have stimulated the housing industry. Older Americans currently have limited housing options. It is estimated that as many as 40% are unnecessarily institutionalized; others own their own homes, which often require increased maintenance costs and Working together for a healthier you -2- rising taxes and utility bills. As well safety and security concerns create significant housing problems. Still other seniors either rent or live with family or friends. Research has shown that most seniors prefer an independent lifestyle. Clearly, housing alternatives need to be developed for the elderly of which assisted living is the most logical option. Assisted living, sometimes referred to as congregate housing, is a community (of apartment, townhomes, etc.) that encourages self- sufficient (independent) lifestyle while providing subtle but essential support services such as meals, housekeeping, safety and security systems and a full range of social and recreational activities including transportation in a residential setting. Security of person and property is the #1 concern of older persons. Most do not wish to leave their neighborhood that has become familiar to them over the years; they simply wish to live in a community that offers an extra measure of protection. Another type of security desired is to.get away from barriers and other physical features of their homes or neighborhoods that is a consequence of sensory or motor impairment which constitutes a hazard for them. The 1982 National Council on the Aging's report:.on the "Housing Choices of Older Americans" indicated 33% of older home owners were interested in non - traditional housing services such as assisted living. Though the Minneapolis senior residential housing marketplace is more mature than the nation as a whole, there are still areas in the metropolitan area that are in need of senior residential housing. A preliminary market analysis study conducted by Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc., in December, 1984, concluded that further consideration of additional market -rate housing for the elderly is needed in the Edina area based on the following facts: o The 1980 census indicated that 14.6% of Edina's total population of 46,073 is aged 65 and older.. This compares with 10.9% of the total population of Hennepin County and 11.2% of the State of Minnesota. 0 6.3% of Edina's population is aged 75 or over. In Minnesota 5.1% of the total population is aged.75 years and over. o According to the state's demographers office Edina had a median family income of $42,265 based on 1981 income tax returns. This is the highest among Minnesota's 106 largest cities. -3- The preliminary study identifies a 75+ segment of the senior population needing alternative housing in the Edina area. Seniors between 75 and 85 are beginning to slow down but are not yet ready for the rocking chair. For example, they may -enjoy a putting green instead of a full - fledge golf course. They may want help with meals and housekeeping. This can be a time of great loneliness for people, too, as spouses and old friends began to die. Developing new relationships becomes a very important factor when relocating. This is the prime market for assisted living. Types of available services that can be implemented within a senior residential housing project is attached (See Exhibit 1). Through further market analysis and consumer research (identification of consumer's needs and desires) the process of product development for the Edina project will define services, fee structure, and product design. As you can see from the changing demographics outlined above, housing for the senior population is a rapidly growing business. However, developing financially and socially successful housing for this special market is difficult and requires expertise in combined disciplines of real estate, development, health care, insurance and social services. Also, in the day -to -day operation of the project, management needs to be prepared to render services as a hotel operator and a social service agency. Food service, housekeeping, janitorial service, transportation, social and referral activities and emergency /security services take assisted living beyond the scope of normal multi - family management. Due to this needed expertise, Health Central Corporation has increased its involvement in rendering development, marketing and management services in respect to senior residential housing. Health Central Corporation is a nationally respected, diversified health care and human services corporation. Health Central's Center for Aging Services has provided a large spectrum of services to the senior population such as participation in the development of the Senior Health Plan, an innovative HMO for the elderly, development of Health Central's Home Health Care division delivering health care services in the home and many others. Health Central Enterprises, a subsidiary of Health Central Corporation, has participated in many senior housing project developments and has expanded its development and management expertise in condominiums and apartments alike. Our groundfloor involvement has taken us into all phases necessary to complete a successful project. Such involvements as these require expertise in the areas of finance, law, marketing and management as well as the sensitivity necessary to be such an important part of home life of the residents (See Exhibit 2). It is our opinion that with the combined skills and expertise of Health Central and the developers, the proposed senior residential housing project located on the Biltmore Hotel site in Edina would be a total success. SERVICES FOR MARKET RATE SENIOR HOUSING Emergency Call Buttons TV Security System 24 -hour Security Laundry Facility Arrangement with Hospital Attendant Trained in CPR Public Transportation Nearby Lush Landscape Staff Trained in Gerontology Convenience Store Multipurpose Room Post Office /Mailing Center Outdoor Exercise Course Lounge Overlooking Activity Exercise Room Beauty /Barber Shop Library /Reading Room Informal Breakfast Area Unit Balcony Nurse on Call 24 hours Manager Trained in Gerontology Small Pool for Exercise Workshop Personal Counseling P1ay"Area for Grandchildren Gardening Space Putting Green Shuffleboard Court Catering for Parties Private Duty Nursing Listing Cafe /Deli Telephone Reassurance Home Health Care Services Office Space for Resident Council Dry Cleaning Pick -up Room for Overnight Guests Auditorium Physical Therapist Doctor Office Craft-Room Carpenter Service Adult Education Space Arrangement w /Nearby Nursing Home Homemaker Service Private Transportation Private Jacuzzi Xerox /Typewriter Available to Residents Tours for Pleasure Blood Pressure Equipment Room Service Weekly Visiting Nurse Arts and Crafts Greenhouse Arrangement with Health Club Laundry Service Shopping Assistance Billiard Room Horseshoes Winsor/Faricy Architects, Inc. Suite 375, 28 West Fifth Street Architects Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Interior Designers 612 227 0655 Planners 16 July 1985 SENIORS CONGREGATE HOUSING Edina, Minnesota For Grandview Development Company Mr. Frank Dunbar Mr. Robert Johnson 5353 Gamble Drive, Suite 311 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 612- 593 -5014 The site is a 3.5 acre parcel fronting on Vernon Avenue between West 52nd St. and West 53rd St. in Edina, and is presently occupied by the Biltmore Motel. The site is triangular in shape, presenting planning difficulties in providing for proper setbacks, parking and attractive building massing. The project includes 152 units varying from one - bedroom to three - bedrooms with common spaces and facilities for a seniors residence, such as offices and security control, kitchen and dining room , meeting room, game room, exercise room, craft room, library, guest rooms and ancillary spaces. The 152 units is permitted by the zoning requirements and is felt to be necessary by the management firm, Health Central, Inc., in order to provide the level of services desired. Vehicles would enter and exit the site from Vernon Ave. at the present intersection and median break. The existing driveway near 53rd. St. would be closed. This proposal is consistent with the recommendations in the Grandview Area Traffic Study, prepared for the City of Edina in April 1984. Cars can then proceed along the drive past a surface parking lot to a porte cochere at the entrance for drop -offs and return to parking or exit. The visitor lot is proposed at a ratio of one car per four units. Parking for residents is enclosed and its ratio is one car per two units. Site area is available for additional surface parking should it be required in the future. Because of the age and life style of this market, the management and planning team feel that traffic impact on the neighborhood would be minimal, occurring during off -peak periods. The building is generally hat shaped in plan with a major recess occurring at the entrance turning circle and porte cochere. Its height is proposed to step up from four stories at the ends to six stories in the middle. This scheme is to breakdown the building and its roofline into units and reduce its overall impact on the site. Alternatives with the building at a uniform, lower height were considered but not preferred since the structure became longer and more continuous. The higher building results in a smaller "footprint" allowing more green space around the building. This is especially advantageous at the abutting residential property along the west where the present 15 foot setback to the Biltmore would increase to approximately 54 feet. The planning team feels that the setting for the building is of primary importance and that generous landscaped yards are critical to an appealing setting. The exterior of the building is to be primarily masonry with surface modulation balcony projections and other design features intended to give a comfortable, familiar residential image to the completed project. �. " Winsor/Faricy Architects, Inc. Specific Data: Site Area: Zone: No. of Units: Lot Area Required: Building Area: F.A.R. Required: F.A.R. Provided: Lot Coverage Required: Lot Coverage Provided: Parking: Required: Provided: Units: Seniors Congregate Housing Edina, Minnesota For Grandview Development Company Page No. 2 152,427 Sq.Ft. (3.5 A) PSR4 Senior Citizen 152 152,000 Sq.Ft. 145,046 Sq.Ft. 1.2 max. 0.95 35% max. 21% Open Enclosed 76 38 51 76 Type Number Net Area Area Required by Zoning 1 Bdr. 70 660 S.F. 500 S.F. Minimum 700 S.F. Maximum 1 Bdr. + Den 33 795 S.F. 850 S.F. 2 Bdr. 41 900 S.F. 750 S.F. Minimum 850 S.F. Maximum 3 Bdr. 8 1,070 1,000 S.F. Community Spaces: Dining Room: 1,990 S.F. Kitchen: 576 S.F. Food Mgr. Office: 120 S.F. Hobby /Craft: 560 S.F. Toi lets: 96 S.F. Library: 636 S.F. Market Place: 80 S.F. Lobby: 950 S.F. Lounge: 950 S.F. Meeting Room: 320 S.F. Game Room: 980 S.F. Exercise Room: 844 S.F. Security Office: 150 S.F. Admin. Offices: 1,064 S.F. Woodworking Shop: 720 S.F. Total: 10,844 S.F. Common Space• Residential Floors Area Per Floor Eff. Floor 1: 5,112 S.F. Floor 1: 31,610 S.F. 849o' Floors 2,3,4: 4,314 S.F. Floors 2,3,4: 26,872 S.F. /Fir. 84175 Floor 5: 4,194 S.F. Floor 5: 22,858 S.F. 82175 Floor 6: 1,850 S.F. Floor 6: 9,962 S.F. 81% RESIDENTIAL 152 SQ. FT. GROSS 0 NET 0 PARKING STALLS 76 ** ***************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** TOTAL LAND 1,500,000 TOTAL ARCH. & ENG. 270,943 TOTAL DEVELOPMENT COST 830,000 TOTAL FINANCING 1,117,998 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 7,741,235 TOTAL MARKETING 715,000 CONTIGENCY 640,799 TOTAL PROJECT COST 12,815,975 ******************* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd 4800 EWING AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410 (612) 927 -8849 August 14, 1985 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney. and Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Council Members: We write in support of the plan for Senior Housing at the Biltmore site that will be presented to the Edina Council meeting by Grandview Develop- ment Company on August 19, 1985. For nearly a year our church has had a committee at work seeking to determine how congregate housing for middle and upper income people could be provided in the Southwest Minneapolis and Edina communities where about 90% of our members live. (Approximately 800 of our members live in Edina). We were prompted to do this by the awareness that some of our members are moving from the community - to Richfield, Bloomington, Golden Valley and farther (� east in Minneapolis - because there aren't suitable alternatives closer to - where they formerly lived. During the course of our committee's work we learned of the plan being for- mulated by Grandview Development Company and have had two meetings with representatives of the company. We are impressed with how our thinking coincides with the plans of Grandview, and our committee's intent is to lend its support to their plan. We also intend to communicate with leaders of the other churches in Edina, encouraging their support. The Grandview plan would seem to be the answer to housing needs for many in our community who no longer wish to live in and maintain their homes. In turn, homes now owned by senior members would be available to younger families, a factor that should benefit the schools and churches, as well as the community at large. In summary, our Senior Housing Committee is enthusiastic about the plan for elderly housing in Edina that is being proposed by Grandview Development Company, and we encourage the Edina City Council to lend its support and approval. Sincerely, V Harris W. Lee James Engen Senior Pastor Chairman, Senior Housing Committee HWL:ved V A. > �" t N U M B E R S -84 -7 Indian Hills 2nd Addition Z -84 -1 S -85 -7 Indian Hills 3rd Addition LOCATION Generally located west of Gleason and south of Crosstown Highway EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Page 6 cCullough added that she felt for the first few year the m s would be subsidized. Mr. Van Hauer added that at wou1 can that each renter would have a small month fee Of $10. - $15.00 as a baseline fee with an additio meal fee. Ms. cullough added that the figure would obably be closer to $ 00. Helen McClella \bame oned whether o of the units would be handicap a. Ms. McCull gh stated that units would be handssible. Hel McClelland asked if the age of 75+ w requireme for rental and what would happen if somme ill an needed to be hospitalized for a time. McCu llough explained that the 75+ is an quo Rental can began at age 55 +. In regard ea ssue The Grandview Team hopes to develop a occupancy cr eria that would address that issue. David Runyan asked Fra Hoffma 'f traffic signals would be constructed at t site. Mr Hoffman stated that the City had targeted th' area to be 'gnalized and have sidewalks put in. Mr. Dunbar by informing the comfortable with their belief tha also expressed and were satis to the commun' v eca d his meeting with a neighborhood Kre ission that most reside Xs were proposed development and xpressed Grandview Team was compe t. They dissatisfaction with the pr ent site d that the proposed development uld add ohn Palmer moved for approval of preliminary re- zoning. elen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. he motion carried. S -85 -7 Gustafson and Assoc. Preliminary Plat Approval Indian Hills 3rd Addition Lots 1 -151 Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd. Lot 11, Block 1, The Timbers Generally Located: South of Crosstown Highway and West of Gleason Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the City Council granted final plat approval to Indian Hills 2nd ,Addition in April, 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots along McCauley Trail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de sac extending south from McCauley Trail. Since that time the Page 7 proponent has acquired lot 11 of the Timbers and is requesting a subdivision which would add portions of this lot to the R -1 lots in Indian Hills 2nd Addition. No new lots are contemplated by this plat. Lots 1 through 7 remain unchanged from the previously approved plat. Mr. Larsen explained that lot 11 of The Timbers is an extremely large neck lot which has access to Timber Ridge Road. The lot also has frontage on Arrowhead Lake. The proposed plat would add approximately 75 feet of width to lots 9, 10, 11; and 12, and would provide lake access to lots 13 and 14. A large irregularly shaped piece would be added to lot 8 by the proposed plat. The remaining lot from the Timbers, which would become lot 16 of Indian Hills 3rd Addition, would continue to provide a large building site. Mr. Larsen added that at the time The Timbers plat was approved a deed restriction was placed on lot 11 which prevented further subdivisions which would create additional building sites. This restriction would need to be released prior to recording the new plat. Mr. Larsen concluded that staff supports the concept of the proposed preliminary plat. The proposal greatly enhances the potential of the lots along Timber Trail while causing no harm to lot 16 as a building site. The proposal represents a more efficient use of property. Staff would suggest some changes in the proposed lot arrangements. As proposed, lot 14 does not meet our definition for minimum lot width, that is, a width of 75 feet at a point 50 back from the street. The lot line between lot 8 and lot 16 should be moved north. The lot line between lot 8 and 9 may need to be moved slightly south to accommodate the driveway for lot 8. Any encroachment on the existing wetland would require permits from the DNR and Nine Mile Creek which may mean that the lot line adjustment mentioned before would be a more appropriate approach for access to lot 8. Mr. Larsen stated that staff recommends approval for the preliminary plat subject to the preceding modifications and the following conditions: 1. A revised grading plan for the property in- cluding the exact location of the wetland area, and the location of all utility easements. 2. Any necessary permits from the Department of Natural Resources and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 3. Release of the restriction on the subdivision of lot 11 of The Timbers. Helen McClelland moved subject to staff conditions. motion. All were in favor. Page 8 for preliminary plat approval Del Johnson seconded the The motion carried. P -85 -3 Richard Page 7711 Normandale Roa/way Planned Commercial PCD -4 Final Development P Generall Located: East of State 00 and north of W Street Mr. Larsen expixined that the s ject property is located on the Edina- oomington bo der adjacent to the Highway 100 frontage r d. East ad north of the subject property is.the Pentagon ffice mplex. To the south is a Howard Johnson's motel. The subject property me res 175 feet by 175 feet, contains 30,625 square feet, d is zoned Planned Commercial District -4 (PCD -4). The p pe y is developed with an automobile service center, hich ffers gasoline sales, and parts and service. The p ponent 's requesting approval of a Final Development Plan o redevel the site as a car wash with related car c aning servi e, and gasoline sales. Mr. Larsen added at the redevel ment plan would require the granting a number of var nces. Car washes are required to main in a 45 foot set b k from both the front street and an side street. The pr osed plan would maintain a 45 foot et back from Viking Dr i e, but would maintain a 25 foo set back from West 78th treet. Thus, a 20 foot side stye set back variance is requ sted. The Zoning Ordinance equires that parking maintai a 20 foot set back from a treet and 10 feet from an inte 'or side lot line. Parking s proposed within 8 feet of West 8th Street, conse ently, a 12 foot parking set back riance is requested. 0 the northeasterly portion of the si a 5 foot parking et back variance would be required. nce the Ordinance a ows only one exterior exit per street f ntage, a variance o allow the second exit to W. 78th Street 's necessary. The final variance involves required spaci of driveways The Ordinance requires that driveways be 5 feet from int sections and be 20 feet from other driveways measure from the end of the returns. The large returns result a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing varian go propo sed Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the plan as would provide the required number of parking spaces and stacking spaces. The proposed exterior materials comply with Ordinance standards. Except for the West 78th Street COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 31, 1985 5 -85 -7 Gustafson and Assoc. Preliminary Plat Approval Indian Hills 3rd Addt. Lots 1 -15, Block 1, Indian Hills 2nd. Lot 11, Block 1, The Timbers Generally Located: South of Crosstown Highway and West of Gleason Road The City Council granted final plat approval to Indian Hills 2nd Addition in April, 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots along McCauley Trail and 8 R -1 lots on a new cul de sac extending south from McCauley Trail. Since that time the proponent has acquired lot 11 of the Timbers and is requesting a subdivision which would add portions of this lot to the R -1 lots in Indian Hills 2nd Addition. No new lots are contemplated by this plat. Lots 1 through 7 remain unchanged from the previously approved plat. Lot 11 of The Timbers is an extremely large neck lot which has access to Timber Ridge Road. The lot also has frontage on Arrowhead Lake. The proposed plat would add approximately 75 feet of depth to lots 9, 10, 11, and 12, and would provide lake access to lots 13 and 14. A large irregularly shaped piece would be added to lot 8 by the proposed plat. The remaining lot from the Timbers, which would become lot 16 of Indian Hills 3rd Addition, would continue to provide a large building site. At the time The Timbers plat was approved a deed restriction was placed on lot 11 which prevented further subdivisions which would create additional building sites. This restriction would need. to be released prior to recording the new plat. Recommendation: Staff supports the concept of the proposed preliminary plat. The proposal greatly enhances the potential of the lots along Timber Trail while causing no harm to lot 16 as a building site. The proposal represents a more efficient use of property. Staff would suggest some changes in the proposed lot arrangements (see attached.graphic). As proposed, lot 14 does not meet odr definition for minimum lot, - width, that is, a width of 75 feet at a point 50 back from the street. The lot line between lot 8 and lot 16 should be moved north as shown on the attached graphic. The lot line between lot 8 and 9 may need to be moved slightly south to accommodate the driveway for lot 8. Any encroachment on the existing wetland would require permits from the DNR and Nine Mile Creek which may mean that the lot line adjustment mentioned before would be a more appropriate approach for access to lot 8. Staff recommends approval for the preliminary plat subject to the preceding modifications and the following conditions: L A revised grading plan for the property in- cluding the exact location of the wetland area, and the location of all utility easements. 2. Any necessary permits from the Department of Natural Resources and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. 3. Release of the restriction on the subdivision of lot 11 of The Timbers. M-w -1-1161A D�� .AXE I Al-c 14 rypr 3b PRELIMINARY PL DEVELOPMENT Pi. INDIAN HILLS 3RD SURVCVoA - ENGIHM 73 . ....... .... ... 15344 HE Vj T3 CR-S a m � oWNEaD -AXE •- 3o I t t'. x i ��_.on�.r u.9.r •.n....ee l.t.. 7ifi ......yt.n ...... �Z�C -GSM N 1� .mac- M \ ,lot r PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT INDIAN HILLS 3RC m � oWNEaD -AXE •- 3o I t t'. x i ��_.on�.r u.9.r •.n....ee l.t.. 7ifi ......yt.n ...... �Z�C -GSM N 1� .mac- M \ ,lot r PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT INDIAN HILLS 3RC \ \ \ e I Y b• lam• J].�y.', L� 1� I°° /I /pylL TLMN• Ii••L / / � -)�N T�• I.awT- a.IYIr G'.. - 0 1 ;^ K•�;,•:. , / �;.''� / /lib/ � ( —��— \\ \I \\ �,• 1 f /i /�� '� •�! —� / /"�\ \`k PRELIMINARY PLAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1 : •• �� \/ , % / / ��� / \ \ I \ INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION 1 •: I �� / � : y/ / • \ 1 : � 1 i t i 1 `. 1 � M,.o °,y°•y \ �\\ I `° '""' .ICY: t /��� - // � I I N��•� 1 I ` 1 1 C \ \ \ 1 L» • •.N MY M »»•I .•Lw LM 1•w •I w NN. •I 1 R 1 , 1 t: 1 1 ` ~a+.1•Y•••IW » •1•Iw I LL4•L waC." »} 1 1 ,'�• w ,t � M.• 1 ». 11. »•» I. IYIY •.LY laa •NII,Ii. YI I all • /ML L.. •.I / ::• wl"• 11� ,yr:M1,'�„•,:11 , I•a • »• ,w•.•M ,1..a . •• - Ilpl ,11.11„ / •I » , •IRRo N AD .a LAKE "' w »1.r .r •.WI,I.. �/' r // PROPOSED LOT REALIGNMENT f 1w1 •..•1./•w Lr.M M. � u.. nwn•. urwu Lu1• :.- la RON KRUBI OBR B ABBOCIATRB. INC. / f I 11-F IFIGAL DEVELOPMENT NUMBER P -85 -3 L O C A T 10 N 7711 Normandale Road East of State Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street REQUEST Final Development Plan EDINA PI_ANNljp \]G DEPARTMENT Page 8 Helen McClelland moved for at approval s Del Johnson secon motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. P -85 -3 Richard Page 7711 Normandale Road Planned Commercial District, PCD -4 Final Development Plan Generally Located: East of State Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street Mr. Larsen expl4ined that the subject property is located on the Edina - Bloomington border adjacent to the Highway 100 frontage road. East and north of the subject property is the Pentagon Office Complex. To the south is a Howard Johnson's motel. The subject property measures 175 feet by 175 feet, contains 30,625 square feet, and is zoned Planned Commercial District -4 (PCD -4). The property is developed with an automobile service center, which offers gasoline sales, and parts and service. The proponent is requesting approval of a Final Development Plan to redevelop the site as a car wash,with related car cleaning service, and gasoline sales. Mr. Larsen added that the redevelopment plan would require the granting of a number of variances. Car washes are required to maintain a 45 foot set back from both the front street and any side street. The proposed plan would maintain a 45 foot set back from Viking Drive, but would maintain a 25 foot set back from West 78th Street. Thus, a 20 foot side street set back variance is requested. The Zoning Ordinance requires that parking maintain a 20 foot set back from a street and 10 feet from an interior side lot line. Parking is proposed within 8 feet of West 78th Street, consequently, a 12 foot parking set back variance is requested. On the northeasterly portion of the site a 5 foot parking set back variance would be required. Since the Ordinance allows only one exterior exit per street frontage, a variance to allow the second exit to W. 78th Street is necessary. The final variance involves required spacing of driveways. The Ordinance requires that driveways be 50 feet from intersections and be 20 feet from other driveways as measured from the end of the returns. The large returns result in a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing variance. I� Mr. Larsen told the Commission that the plan as proposed would provide the required number of parking spaces and stacking spaces. The proposed exterior materials comply with Ordinance standards. Except for the West 78th Street Page 9 side the building meets all required set backs. The proponent has submitted a landscape plan and schedule which meet the requirements of the Ordinance. Mr. Larsen concluded that the proposed car wash is a deluxe facility which should be much more aesthetically pleasing than a typical car wash and would provide an improvement over the existing use on the site. the plan would provide green areas and landscaping where there is now none. The building is proposed at the smallest possible .size in which to house the conveyor wash system. Several alternative site plans were reviewed.in an attempt to minimize the need for variances and provide smooth function and traffic flow. The proposed site plan provides the best arrangement on the site. Mr. Larsen suggested that parking space number 12 be removed. Mr. Page was present to explain his proposal. Mr. Page pointed out to the Commission that the City of Edina lacked a full service car wash. Mr. Page added that the present gas station would be demolished and the proposed car wash /gas station would be built in its place. Mr. Page stated that he offered an employment agreement to the man who ran the previous gas station enabling him to run the proposed gas station /car wash . Mr. Page informed the Board that he had contacted Pentagon Park the owners of the adjoining parking lot with the request to lease additional parking spaces if the car wash parking demand should increase. Mr. Page was informed that for a fee of $10.00 per month up to 10 cars would be able to be parked. Mr. John Palmer moved approval of the Final Development Plan. John Skagerberg seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. P -85- Hoyt Constr Final Deve Generally Located: ast o south ion ant Plan f -lia Circle and 0 f We 8th Street ti COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 31, 1985 P -85 -3 Richard Page 7711 Normandale Road Planned Commercial District, PCD -4 Final Development Plan Generally Located: East of State Highway 100 and north of West 78th Street The subject property is located on the Edina - Bloomington border adjacent to the Highway 100 frontage road. East and north of the subject property is the Pentagon Office Complex. To the south is a Howard Johnson's motel. The subject property measures 175 feet by 175 feet, contains 30,625 square feet, and is zoned Planned Commercial District -4 (PCD -4). The property is developed with an automobile service center, which offers gasoline sales, and parts and service. The proponent is requesting approval of a Final Development Plan to redevelop the site as a car wash,with related car cleaning service, and gasoline sales. The redevelopment plan would require the granting of a number of variances. Car washes are required to maintain a 45 foot set back from both the front street and any side street. The proposed plan would maintain a 45 foot set back from Viking Drive, but would maintain a 25 foot set back from West 78th Street. Thus, a 20 foot side street set back variance is requested. The Zoning Ordinance requires that parking maintain a 20 foot set back from a street and 10 feet from an interior side lot line. Parking is proposed within 8 feet of West 78th Street, consequently, a 12 foot parking set back variance is requested. On the northeasterly portion of the site a 5 foot parking set back variance would be required. Since the Ordinance allows only one entry-orexit per street frontage, a variance to allow the second exit to W. 78th Street is necessary. The final variance involves required spacing of driveways. The Ordinance requires that driveways be 50 feet from intersections and be 20 feet from other driveways as measured from the end of the returns. The large returns result in a request for a 30 foot drive aisle spacing variance. The plan as proposed would provide the required number of parking spaces and stacking spaces. The proposed exterior materials comply with Ordianance standards. Except for the West 78th Street side the building meets all required set backs. The proponent has submitted a landscape plan and schedule which meet the requirements of the Ordinance. Recommendation: The proposed car wash is a deluxe facility which should be much more aesthetically pleasing than a typical car wash and would provide an improvement over the existing use on the site. the plan would provide green areas and landscaping where there is now none. The building is proposed at the smallest possible size in which to house the conveyor wash system. Several alternative site plans were reviewed in an attempt to minimize the need for variances and provide smooth function and traffic flow. The proposed site plan provides the best arrangement on the site. Staff would suggest that parking number 12 be removed. V� Oumnn.iA D : _ - ' ,�- ;--� 1 INA CARW ASH - >, ` I .mow W tei._aw�. o<lram..i• „. `i.. ...L. _. - i bt/ Jr -rY f..0•� - - ► • i J "�v •, . ;,. , -r., ,- �',.. `` �'�` � ,• ��; ..... � x .rr � Landscape-Plan- ,=S z 6,-r R - ,�•, -f• r f% / ✓r.' y_ .lei : 12�r+�i t' r 1 - _•F� if i�T -. :� ' "... aIII.J Aw. ra{q�' e�i+1 1 rY ~JI_ �� 1 � �r� p - j'� , , �! � � � f .3 i,{/. -dam/ ••_, .vj'�� y . �.. +� ;; �1!! - i i�.+ar zt poi " -.,' •c y♦ ,:,• _ � �_ ,. y d� . jsaaa.r ptrtna�•�. was.).: - t . rA �y f"i �• `3'- •J.E`_�i -`: rA f.. •••�I�_ - �- f]r--�l �.�`..i� %�! �•' 1 �1 i , -y'-te- '-" r�.7w:.. -tzeemczu�' .. ra. s.v.•a) .. ':c% i ``. , tSa x ro< ` t ':. ✓ r: rfi r. �i�+ 12 I 1 10 °I b 7 (0 5 9 3 i ~' 2 I r eXI I _- _ • - _ i I •1 . � - _ : _ •;� 1' 'i..r . �;+4j lb 17 iG 15 -14 461 i '. I . +' .°s "' �►. rrt �� .!Y• s f - f I� . r 4. -, , s" ,•'�>' :l1:ts�,'-:^ . . fl i _ r 1 - - I _�I : S 'ZpNiNiy. 75NCT _ FcKrNGZaaG Pro PO� zcViw, Fr, - r e.Y4 F•F,.r-J n6 ON GIT-= r r' _ .._` "`" +_ Y_ ,.• _ _ - 1* - SFE+�6►'( /GR�61i 1 . /r - ' • - 4 / J.3vr' !•di - G I\ r' to ' - 1 P� EMFLO %£ 'f l 1 �^ G 3 %2 RVIG2 bals - r#I 1-7 FFf�AftV - 18 I'FOJIOEa �, -u1.• t oFrLE �, I '_ M W I - . . IF ., - \ -' S � ' �^ rr� �: r- a,n'at,''•:;e.:`� � -21C7E- .•l� --- ! — f ` 1 * ''��' - r••�- ,r • 7 w}r.J.'liF+- .: �r Lr 1.. r� •."�,:�a � -- FI�R'�r �� - , I..r %7074- 6WKINCs 2rr G �6 ✓' '�' 7 r _ 1 r+iVM(,.16VIVD^ i Fl�IUNG 10 i SC t L -- -�- WMr Iz11r440' . Ln . uya .i• �„ 1`__ _ ,T � ... , _ 4'3�7316H�M _ . ••f i `..i `i r J•• 5fr' �i(rr a 1 �O _m _ 1 ,. �✓ i� ! : exit Ll C-- �' _ - -1%�: .. �,.-� ,.r o' ;rat. ` i•. .4 � �� - j. � -• �: �R . _ s O r �': - -ice. �, • '� s aic --f; cbartL:A�lriuct -7 0 .x[24 SlA 1— p EDINA 3 1'-e rU 4 Pt le �51 1� f�14 91 \-�\7 mcbrmdm ,Ja� (Vag*mnd� ex f-V lb 17 1(. is P, X CVL.Azev P060H enfrj r V C11 =%3tr- .'e, 24 A e)( Ln 1 7 t. CARWASH -- flWa,ev ZCHIWP FL' fe" bwr/c^w4" fek WATLZME-oa- x ?- -C-jtm ca bals grqvgw mpmw SM 35 . lKmAm zr2,, r?.4wrc. jo ......... W' F~20 EDINA, -- CARWASH Elevations — &99A" Mr. Ift.0-T V-75 Axtrf G6-Z" Ll NORTH Page • Ziebarth Architects tects .......... S FJAAL DEVELOPMENTm NUMBER P -85 -4 PLAN L O C A T 10 N 5555 1Y, 78th Street Lot 2, Block 2, 9 Mile Creek W Addition Lot 1, Block 9, Interchange Center REQUEST Final Development Plan EDINA PLANNING' DEPARTMENT Page 9 -de the building meets all required set backs. Thjr p onent has submitted a landscape plan and sched a which mee the requirements of the Ordinance. Mr. sen concluded that th/ee sed r wash is a deluxe faci 'ty which should be mre a thetically pleasing than typical car wash uld rovide an improvement ov the existing use te. the plan would provide gr n areas and lan where there is now none. The buildi is proposed aallest possible size in which to ho a the conveysystem. Several alternative site pla were reviean attempt to minimize the need for riances aide smooth function and traffic flow. The oposed sn provides the best arrangement on the site. r. Largested that parking space number 12 be removed. Mr. Page was present to elain his proposal. Mr. Page pointed Yd t tFa he mmission that the City of Edina lacked a full ser wa Mr. Page added that the present gas statio be de •lished and the proposed car wash /gas station w built its place. Mr. Page stated that he offereemploymen agreement to the man who ran the previostation en ling him to run the proposed gas station /c . Mr. Page informe the Board that he ha contacted Pentagon Park the ow rs of the adjoining pa ing lot with the request to leas additional parking spac if the car wash parking deman should increase. Mr. Page s informed that for a fee of 0.00 per month up to 10 cars would be able to be parked Mr. John P er moved approval of the Final Development Plan. John Sk rberg seconded the motion. All were in favor. The mo on carried. P -85 -4 Hoyt Construction Final Development Plan Generally Located: East of Cecilia Circle and south of West 78th Street Page 10 Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the subject property is a 5 acre parcel zoned Planned Industrial District, PID. The site is developed with small warehouse building located in the south central portion of the lot. PID properties are located to the west and northeast of the site. Property to the north is vacant, but was recently zoned for townhouses and apartments. Property to the south is in the City of Bloomington and is developed with similar uses. The proponent has submitted plans which contemplate the redevelopment of the site with an office - warehouse building of 72,390 square feet. Mr. Larsen added that the proposed building would be evenly split between office and warehouse uses. In the PID Zone office space must provide parking at a rate of 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area and warehouse space must provide parking at a rate of one space for each 2000 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed plan would provide 209 parking spaces where 199 are required. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the exterior materials of the building would be brick with copper trim. These materials comply with Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen continued that the redevelopment of the site would require a number of variances. The most northerly corner of the building maintains a set back'of 56 feet where 75 feet is required. Parking and drive aisles encroach into required set backs along the northerly portion of the site. The required 10 foot parking to building set back is not provided at several points along the north and east sides of the building. Mr. Larsen concluded that the site is large relatively flat parcel with no obvious limitations to its redevelopment. There are areas of poor soil in the southwesterly portion of the property and a steep slope along northerly property line. These conditions do not limit the ability to redevelop the site. Except for the 100 foot inset of the property line in the northeast corner of the property staff can identify no compelling reasons that variances are warranted for this proposal. Mr. Larsen stated that staff recommends denial of the Final Development Plan. The proponents Mr. Bradley Hoyt and Mr. Bill Anderson of Design Partnership were present. Mr. Anderson with the aid of graphics described to the Commission the site of the proposed warehouse. Mr. Anderson stated that the area has a large amount of natural vegetation and combined with the slope of the land makes the visual impact of the site minimal. Mr. Anderson further Page 11 explained to the Commission reasons why the development of this parcel requires variances. Mr. Hoyt stated that the proposed warehouse design is very attractive. The intrusion of the corner totals 6/10 of 1% of total warehouse space. Mr. Anderson added that to maintain the geometry of the structure the corner would have to remain as proposed. If the corner was moved back to comply with staff requests the warehouse structure would loose 3,000 square feet. Mr. Hoyt continued by informing the Commission that Hoyt had a previous plan that would not have required variances, but that warehouse design did not allow adequate parking. This new warehouse design enables the site to supply adequate parking for the tenants. David Runyan felt that one of the positive aspects of the project was.its irregular building shape by pointing out that most warehouse structures are boxlike. Mr. Runyan added that he also felt that a honest attempt was made to soften the structure with landscaping. Mr. Runyan further added that he found no problem with the corner and reflected the opinion of the proponents that to change the corner would affect the geometry of the structure. Del Johnson commented that he has seen the completed warehouse structure the proponents have constructed in Bloomington and that the structure is very attractive. Mr. David Runyan moved to approve the project and the variances. Mr. John Palmer seconded the motion. William Lewis, Del Johnson and John Skagerberg voted aye. Helen McClelland voted naye. The motion carried 5 -1 vote. LD -85 -9 Ron Clark Constru ion, Inc. 6500 -02 GleasZeason rt of 5, Block Court Request: Pa wall to sion Mr. Larsen informed the ission that the proponent is requesting a party wall to vision of an existing double bungalow. Mr. Larsen stated tha the prop ed division meets Zoning Ordinance require is for the 'vision of R -2 properties. Mr. Larsen conclyfed that staff recomd%pds approval. John Palmer mood for approval of the loll division. Helen McClelland se nded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 31, 19'85 P -85 -4 Hoyt Construction Final Development Plan Refer To: Attached Plans Generally Located: East of Cecilia Circle and south of West 78th Street The subject property is a 5 acre parcel zoned Planned Industrial District, PID. The site is developed with small warehouse building located in the south central portion of the lot. PID properties are located to the west and northeast of the site. Property to the north is vacant, but was recently zoned for townhouses and apartments. Property to the south is in the City of Bloomington and is developed with similar uses. The proponent has submitted plans which contemplate the redevelopment of the site with an office - warehouse building of 72,390 square feet. The proposed building would be evenly split between office and warehouse uses. In the PID zone office space must provide parking at a rate of 5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area and warehouse space must provide parking at a rate of one space for each 2000 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed plan would provide 209 parking spaces where 199 are required. Exterior materials of the building would be brick with copper trim. These materials comply with Ordinance requirements. Redevelopment of the site would require a number of variances. The most northerly corner of the building maintains a set back of 56 feet where 75 feet is required. Parking and drive aisles encroach into required set backs along the northerly portion of the site. The required 10 foot parking to building set-back is not provided at several points along the north and east sides of the building. Recommendation: The site is large relatively flat parcel with no obvious limitations to its redevelopment. There are areas of poor soil in the southwesterly portion of the property and a steep slope along conditions do not limit Except for the 100 foot northeast corner of the compelling reasons that proposal. Staff recomm Plan. northerly property line. These the ability to redevelop the site. inset of the property line in the property staff can identify no variances are warranted for this ends denial of the Final Development LOOATIOM MAP NO SCALE l� 7 EXISTING RETAINING WALL _ 20' SETBACK LIT STATION . YM EA13T. 0' V .Erg Al NORTH 1 317E PLAN /UTIUTY PLAN ry �.� \o7y t BRIDGE C. I N IV •2• .24, 1\ +III /fi' 11 I I 177' .... r 20 BETrACK I 6" TRACK \ III \ SITE INFORMATION SITE AREA • APPROL 6 ACRES• /1 7.000 SP BUILDING AREA • 72.770 BP SITE COVERAGE- 77% OPFlCE • 70.126 SP & 11700. 71 WHSE.•30.106BPevs00- 7t REQUIRED PARKING SPACES • 102 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES • 206 HANDICAPPED SPACES • 6 a ZQ Za {C1al �E N7 d l t r r` r _ <�NtZz LOCATION MAP NO SCALE - -- COSTING RETAINING WALL ANN \� \\ ADMM WA" � ��• . \ I if 'eie ! (— seo'. ul 4l _ e3x I 1 FLOOR ELEV.— 833 824— 'i qq .._ lexe I I ex ca —Ex-. aaeo / e2Y. I 1 81 414.11 r , NORTH GRADING PLAN Ax =�o^o LOQA71ON MAP NO SCALE . IVY • EXISTING RETAINING WALL ` EXISTING TREES C AND SHRUBS SODDED 1 1 r N TH 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTE: SOD FROM CURB LINE TO NATURAL AJ 1' . AO' -C' AREA ANO OTHER DISTURBED AREA ON NORTH BIDE OF PROPERTY LANDSCAPE NOTES S9 OVERSTORY TREES 3S UNDERSTORY TREES 13 LARGE SHRUBS 197 SMALL SHRUBS RETAINING WALL ` II 1 \ � � � IVY 11 1 1 \ / I 1 •s JIII .I R I it Z 5 a co ASH. MARSHALL'S FRAXMUS PENNSYLVANIA LANCEOLATA ASH XS 112 BB ®t NADIENT CRAB NALUS RADIENT BB BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SPA SS � RUSSIAN OLIVE BB PICEA OLAUCA DENSATA 11 S, �•y ELAEAONUS AN DUSTIFOW (.ZA XONEYSUGNIE 2ASEL9 LONICEA NOROLNOW ZASELf IS, POT 00000 �• BOSTON PARTHENOUSSUB TRICUSPIDATA R.44 POT RED TWIG DOGWOOD (2pejo JUNIPER. ANDORRA POT 000 CORNUS STOLONIFER RTD 9 1S' POT �'6r JUNivERUS HORQONTALIS'PLUMOSA' WILTON CARPET JUNIPER WCJ 18 18 POT EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'W4TONI' ® CURRENT. ALPINE AC 143 1Y I POT RIBES ALPINUM S9 OVERSTORY TREES 3S UNDERSTORY TREES 13 LARGE SHRUBS 197 SMALL SHRUBS RETAINING WALL ` II 1 \ � � � IVY 11 1 1 \ / I 1 •s JIII .I R I it Z 5 a co PARTIAL FLOOR PLAN r- PHINITED AU G 1.41985 { _T1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager (E�/ � SUBJECT: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN DATE: August 16, 1985 The Council granted preliminary approval of the ten -year Capital Improvement Plan on July 1, 1985 . We noted at that time that a Capital Improvement Plan is considered to be part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and, as such, had to go through the same adoption process as the Plan itself. This process is: 1) Approval by the Planning Commission; 2) Approval by the City Council and transmittal to the Metropolitan Council; 3) Review by Metropolitan Council; and 4) Adoption by the City Council. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 31, 1985, and approved the C.I.P. If the City Council now wishes to approve the C.I.P., we recommend that it adopt a resolution approving the City of Edina's Capital Improvement Plan, 1986 -1995, and authorize its submission to the Metropolitan Council. The attached C.I.P. is identical to that approved by the Council on July 1, 1985 . However, we have identified those items which constitute new construction or major additions in accordance with the Council's request. GH /sw Page 12 *Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ten Year Capital Improvement Program. Jerry Dalen was present to answer any questions the public or Commission may have on the issue. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that the Capital Improvement Plan was considered a part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and that amendments to the plan must originate before the Commission at a public hearing. He further informed the Commission that the Council had held several hearings on the proposed CIP and had given it a preliminary approval pending this public hearing. Mr. Palmer noted that no members of the public were present for the public hearing. David Runyan moved to pass the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Ten Year Capital Improvement Program to the City Council for consideration and adoption. Helen McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. IV. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M. Respectfully Submitted, I CAPITAL PLAN - 1986 CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 GENERAL FUND: Voting machines City Hall - air conditioning Public Works Building: Overhead crane $ 10,000 Exhaust system 10,000 Fire Department: Parking lot $ 4,000 Computer terminal 10,000 Storm Sewers - Watershed projects Parking Ramps - 492 Street- Sealing Streets: France avenue from West 50th Street to Excelsior Blvd.(North City limit) $250,000 West 50th Street from Halifax to Highway 100(one -half) 650,000 West 772 Street from West 77th Street to .12 mile east of France (one -half) 250,000 Alley: East of France (small lengths) $ 15,000 West 51st Street to West 52nd Street between Oxford and Bedford 16,000 West 51st Street to West 52nd Street between Hankerson and Williams 20,000 Bridges: Browndale and Minnehaha Creek Street Lighting: West 50th Street from Halifax to Highway 100(one -half) Sidewalks and Paths: France from West 40th Street to West 48th Street $ 77,000 Maloney from Blake to County Highway 18 65,000 Benton from Hansen Road to Highway 100 44,000 Parks: Cornelia School - Regrade, sodding and building renovation $ 25,000 Normandale- Regrade, fencing, trees and refurbish 50,000 Lewis -Two tennis courts 40,000 Valkenburg - Improvements - (One- fourth) 125,000 Wooddale School: Demolition building (one- fourth) 25,000 Improvements - (One -half) 50,000 Parking lot 100,000 Gun Range - Parking lot TOTAL GENERAL AND RELATED FUNDS $ 100,000 35,000 20,000 14,000 20,000 30,000 1,150,000 51,000 90,000 200,000 186,000 415,000 3,000 $2,314,000 CAPITAL PLAN - 1986 CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 UTILITIES FUND: Lift Station - Monterey, Grimes and Englewood. Replace with single Flygt station Lift Station - 72nd and Tracy - Emergency power Wells - Braemar and Gleason - Pull pumps (two) Wells - Brookview Heights and Mirror Lakes. Replace recorders (two). Wells - Halifax and Southdale - Replace boost pumps(two) GOLF COURSE: Maintenance building Club house addition Reconstruct - Par three course Rip -rap on #3 and #7 water holes TOTAL FUNDING PROVIDED AS FOLLOWS: Special assessment Budget (operating) Bond sale (Golf Course) Transfer from Utilities Fund - Rent Cash on hand - Van Valkenburg Park - sale of gravel Working Capital Fund - Income on investments State - aid Construction Account Watershed District - (Shared cost) Earnings: Utilities Golf Course TOTAL $100,000 5,000 20,000 3,000 3,000 $ 131,000 $250,000 600,000 350,000 20,000 1,220,000 $3,665,000 $ 389,000 97,000 1,200,000 100,000 78,000 404,000 1,236,000 10,000 $131,000 20,000 151,000 $3,665,000 BUDGET (OPERATING) CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS(ASSESSED) Beginning balance January 1, 1986 $217,287 REVENUE " EXPENDITURES 1986 $ 50,000 $ 62,000 205,287 1987 50,000 58,000 197,287 1988 50,000 17,000 230,287 1989 50,000 37,000 243,287 1990 50,000 59,000 234,287 1991 50,000 22,000 262,287 1992 50,000 36,000 276,287 1993 50,000 36,000 290,287 1994 50,000 1995 35,000 305,287 50,000 50,000 305,287 $500,000 $412,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS(GENERAL) Beginning balance January 1, 1986 $ 49,583 REVENUE EXPENDITURES 1986 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 49,583 1987 50,000 45,000 54,583 1988 50,000 50,000 54,583 1989 50,000 40,000 64,583 1990 50,000 114,583 1991 50,000 164,583 1992 50,000 214,583 1993 50,000 264,583 1994 50,000 15,000 299,583 1995 50,000 10,000 339,583 $500,000 $210,000 SUMMARY: Capital Improvements (Assessed) $412,000 Capital Improvements (General) 210,000 Wooddale School (Demolition) 100,000 $722,000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 WORKING CAPITAL Beginning balance at January 1, 1986 $125,000 TRANSFER FROM UTILITIES UND INCOME DISBURSEMENTS 1986 - $ 100,000 $ 300,000 $ 504,000 21,000 1987 100,000 350,000 438,000 33,000 1988 100,000 400,000 504,000 29,000 1989 100,000 400,000 523,000 6,000 1990 100,000 425,000 517,000 14,000 1991 100,000 425,000 488,000 51,000 1992 100,000 450,000 532,000 69,000 1993 100,000 450,000 462,000 157,000 1994 100,000 450,000 329,000 378,000 1995 100,000 450,000 2249000 704,000 $1,000,000 $4,100,000 :$4,521,000 STATE -AID CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 STATE (CONSTRUCTION ACCOUNT) Beginning balance at January 1, 1986 $ 486,638 128,550 145,550 447,550 754,550 1,156,550 1,576,550 2,009,550 2,440,550 2,966,550 3,602,550 INCOME DISBURSEMENTS 1986 $ 877,912 $1,236,000 1987 900,000 883,000 1988 925,000 623,000 1989 950,000 643,000 1990 975,000 573,000 1991 1,000,000 580,000 1992 1,000,000 567,000 1993 1,000,000 569,000 1994 1,000,000 474,000 1995 1,000,000 364,000 $9,627,912 $6,512,000 $ 486,638 128,550 145,550 447,550 754,550 1,156,550 1,576,550 2,009,550 2,440,550 2,966,550 3,602,550 TEN YENR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTIMTED JULY 1, 1985 - DESCRIPTION. CXT 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 SLI'VARY: Expenditures: General Swimming Pool $13,858,000 124,000 $2,311 $1,759 $1,482 $1,511 $1,301 $1,131 $1,246 $1,242 $1,026 $ 849 Art Center 62000 7 100 10 7 Gun Range 47,000 3 5 5 5 9 12 5 36 Recreation Center (Arena) 320,000 10 23 20 25 4 50 73 100 10 10 24 TOTAL GENERAL & M ATED FUNDS $14,411,000 $2,314 $1,774 $1,517 $1,536 $1,460 $1,251 $1,355 $1,288 Liquor 165,000 10 35 60 $1,043 $ 873 Utilities 854,000 131 131 97 70 30 30 Golf course 1,565,000 1,220 125 100 100 100 125 45 35 45 45 50 TOIAL $16,995,000 $3,665 $1,915 $1,649 $1,666 --------------------- = ---- -- -- -- ------ _- $1,615 $1,326 - -- -`-- $1,490 $1,048 $1,433 $1,188 REMAJE __- _________= ==- -a - -_= ---- - --- -- ------------------ Special assessments Budget (operating) $ 2,331,000 722,000 $ 389 97 $ 223 $ 200 $ 248 $ 254 $ 161 $ 220 $ 221 $ 190 $ 225 Civil Defense 34,000 128 14 92 10 102 99 22 36 36 50 60 Debt -bond sale 1,200,000 1,200 10 Transfer -Rent Cash on hand 1,000,000 234,000 100 78 100 78 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Other Funds 7,000 78 Working Capital Fund State Aid 3,521,000 6,512,000 404 1,236 338 883 404 423 7 417 388 432 362 229 124 Watershed District 50,000 10 10 623 10 643 10 573 580 567 569 474 364 Earnings: 10 Liquor Utilities 165,000 854,000 131 10 131 35 97 60 70 30 30 Golf course 365,000 20 100 100 100 125 - - -- - -- -- - -- 125 45 35 45 45 50 $16,995,000 $3,665 $1,915 = aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa�aasaaaaaaaaaaaaa= $1,649 $1,666 $1,615 a= aaaaa == $1,326 $1,490 _ $1,433 $1,188' $1,048 ==-- a�a= aaa= a_a -__= __- �______- TEN YFAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTIMATED JULY 11 1985 DESCRIPTION CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 G EPAL FUND: Voting Machines R $ 100,000 $ 100 Communications System (Telephone) R City Flail: Air Conditioning System R Replacement Windows R Heating System R Replacement Carpeting. R TOTAL CITY HALL Public Works Building: Overhead Crane R Exhaust System R * Double Deck -two bays R * Public Works Building:(Danen Area) B&R TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINGS Fire Department: * Parking R Upgrade - mobile radio units R * Computer Terminal R Heating & Air conditioning R *7 Energy Program - Insulation, Ceiling Fans, Etc. R * Utility Vehicle- (carry rescue equipment) R * Addition- second floor R Replacement Carpeting R * Opti.- Cortm(traffic control system).R TOTAL FIRE DEPARIMWr 60,000 $ 60 $ 35,000 $ 35 25,000 $ 25 35,000 $ 35 15,000 $ 15 $ 110,000 $ 35 $ 60 $ 25 $ 15 $ 35 $ 10,000 $ 10 10,000 10 40,000 $ 90 300,000 75 $ 75 $ 75. $ 75 S 360,000 $ 20 $ 115 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 $ 11,000 $ 4 $ 7 18,000 $ 18 10,000 10 10,000 10 15,000 $ 15 35,000 35 125,000 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 $ 25 5,000 5 50,000 25 25 S 279,000 $ 14 $ 17 $ 50 $ 48 $ 50 $ 50 $ 25 $ 25 Police Department: Convert alert system from phone to radio R&CD $ Convert five sirens R&CD * Addition to city hall -(1600 sq.ft. R * Computer aided dispatching * Mobile data terminals (15) R * Mobile command communication van R R * Forensic photographic laboratory Alarm monitoring R computer R * Equipment and vehicle for non -sworn security force (City owned alarm s stem 28,000 40,000 100,000 75,000 45,000 45,000 40,000 50,000 $ 28 $ 20 $ 20 100 $ 75 $ 45 $ 45 $ 40 $ 50 y ) R 30,000 $ 30 'I� DEPARIIP $ 453,000 $ 28 $ 20 $ 120 $ 75 S 45 $ 45 $ 40 $ 50 S 30 1'tld 1UQi LAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA JULY 11 1985 DESCRIPTION G ENERAL FUND (CONY.): Storm Sewers: ESTIMATED CODE Cif 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 Slipline-Country Club Area Watershed Projects R $ 500,000 R&W 100,000 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 120 $ 120 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 TOTAL STOM S'M; S 600,000 $ 20 $ 20 $ 20 $ 120 $ 120 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 Parking Ramps: Sealing (surface and joint): 49 1/2 Street R&B $ 100,000 $ 30 $ 20 51st Street R&B 20,000 $ 25 $ 25 $ 20 TO'PAL PARKING RAMPS $ 120,000 $ 30 $ 20 $ 20 $ 25 $ 25 Parking lots: City Ball- resurface R $ 25,000 $ 25 Grandview - resurface R&D 15,000 50th Street Area - resurface R 20,000 $ 15 $ 20 TOTAL PARKING LOTS $ 60,000 $ 25 $ 15 $ 20 Streets: Reconstruction: France Ave. from w. 50th to Excelsior Blvd. SA $ 250,000 $ 250 Braema v B1 d f r . ran Gleason to Valley View SA Wooddale from W.50th to Valley View SA W.50th- Halifax to 100 SA W.69th from France to Xerxes SA Valley View from Mark Terrace to McCauley Trail SA W. 54th - from France to Wooddale SA W.66th- France to 100 SA Kellogg,Oaklawn,Brookview fran W.52nd St. to W.56th St. R W.69th St.- Valley View to Wooddale SA W.66th St.- Xerxes to Valley View SA W.66th- Valley View to 100 SA * New Construction: W.77 1/2 Street from W.77th St. to .12 miles east of France SA 684,000 $ 684 390,000 $ 390 1,300,000 650 $ 650 195,000 195 165,000 165 395,000 $ 395 500,000 S 500 500,000 565,000 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 570,000 565 835,000 570 435 400 500,000 250 250 $6,849,000 $ 1,150 $ 900 $ 750 $ 684 $ 395 $ 600 $ 665 $ 670 $ 535 $ 500 Bridges: Browndale to Minnehaha Creek R $ 90,000 $ 90 Valley View to Soo Line Railroad R 20,000 $ 20 Benton Ave & Soo Line Railroad R 25,000 $ 25 TOTAL BRIDGES $ 135,000 $ 90 $ 20 $ 25 Street Lighting: Conversion from mercury vapor to low pressure sodium R $ 300,000 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 .$ 75 50th St. from Etalifax to 100 - underground powerlines A 400,000 $ 200 200 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $ 700,000 $ 200 $ 275 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 * Sidewalks and Paths: TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN France from W.40th St. to W,48th St. SA $ 77,000 CITY OF EDINA Maloney from Blake to County 18 SA 65,000 JULY 11 1985 Lincoln Dr, from Maloney to W. 7th St SA ESTIMATED $ 33 Interlachen from Blake to W.7th St. DESCRIPTION CODE C0ST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 GENERAL FUND (O0[VT.): 96,000 1994 1995 Alleys: $ 96 to Vernon County 158, Link Rd. to County 62 East of France B&A $ 15,000 $ 15 Olinger Blvd, from Tracy to W.51st St. to W.52nd St. 148 Mud Lake Trail (Two locations) B&A 36,000 36 Tracy from North side County 62 to TOTAL ALLEYS $ 51,000 $ 51 Valley View Bridges: Browndale to Minnehaha Creek R $ 90,000 $ 90 Valley View to Soo Line Railroad R 20,000 $ 20 Benton Ave & Soo Line Railroad R 25,000 $ 25 TOTAL BRIDGES $ 135,000 $ 90 $ 20 $ 25 Street Lighting: Conversion from mercury vapor to low pressure sodium R $ 300,000 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 .$ 75 50th St. from Etalifax to 100 - underground powerlines A 400,000 $ 200 200 TOTAL STREET LIGHTING $ 700,000 $ 200 $ 275 $ 75 $ 75 $ 75 * Sidewalks and Paths: France from W.40th St. to W,48th St. SA $ 77,000 $ 77 Maloney from Blake to County 18 SA 65,000 65 Lincoln Dr, from Maloney to W. 7th St SA 33,000 $ 33 Interlachen from Blake to W.7th St. R&A 67,000 $ 67 Blake from Interlachen to Vernon SA 96,000 Glengarry Parkway from Interlachen $ 96 to Vernon County 158, Link Rd. to County 62 R&A R&A 62,000 148,000 62 $ Olinger Blvd, from Tracy to 148 Mud Lake Trail R&A 31,000 31 Tracy from North side County 62 to Valley View SA 23,000 23 Benton from Hansen Road to 100 SA 44,000 44 East and West Frontage Roads from Valley View to Eden R&A 172,000 Valley View from 100 to Wooddale SA 44,000 172 Concord from School Rd.to 44 Valley View SA 15,000 Wooddale from w.50th to Valley view SA 123,000 15 W. 58th from Concord to Xerxes SA 102,000 $ 123 W.54th from Wooddale to France SA 42,000 102 Valley View from 100 to Maddox Lane R&A 33,000 42 Maddox Ln. fran Valley View to Wyman R&A 10,000 33 Wyman from Maddox Ln.to W.63rd R&A 6,000 10 6 DESCRIPTION *GENERAL FUND (COMP.): Sidewalks and Paths (Cont): W.63rd & Ridgeview Rd. fran Wyman ESTIMATED CODE COST TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 to Ridgeview Drive R&A $ 23,000 $ 23 Valley Ln. from Doran Ln. to W.66th SA 38,000 38 W.66th from Ridgeview Dr. to Valley View SA 96,000 $ 96 W.69th from Valley View to York Ave. SA 7,000 $ 7 W.70th from Valley View to France SA 8,000 8 France from Gallagher Drive to South City Limits R&A 48,000 $ 48 Parklawn Ave. from Gallagher Dr. to 21 feet west of York Ave. R&A 26,000 26 York Ave. from W.66th to W.69th R&A 34,000 34 W.76th from Parklawn to York Ave. R&A 48,000 48 York Ave. from W.76th to W.78th R&A 24,000 24 Parklawn Ave & W 77th St. from 76th to Edina Industrial Blvd. R&A 69,000 69 Metro Blvd. from W.70th to Edina Industrial Blvd. SA 75,000 75 Edina Industrial Blvd. from Metro Blvd. to W.78th St. SA 32,000 $ 32 W.78th fran Edina Industrial Blvd. to Cahill Rd. SA 11,000 11 W.74th St.,Bush Lake Rd.,Dewey Hill Rd., from Metro Blvd. to Cahill Rd. R&A 48,000 48 Gleason Rd. from Valley View to Dewey Hill Rd. SA 94,000 94 Valley View fran Gleason Rd. to McCauley Trail SA 104,000 104 McCauley Tr.South & McCauley Tr. North Fran Valley View to Gleason R&A 138,000 138 Ohms Lane fran W.72nd to W.74th R&A 23,000 $ 23 W. 60th fran France to Xerxes SA 44,000 44 Lincoln Dr. from W.7th St. to 1000 feet South R&A 16,000 16 Braemar Golf Course R&A 105,000 105 Xerxes, W.70th to Yorktown Park R&A 19,000 19 Along County 18 fran 1000 feet south of W.7th to Creek R&A 32,000 32 TOTAL SIDEWALKS AND PATHS $2,355,000 $ 186 $ 64 $ 90 $ 244 $ 491 $ 263 $ 258 $ 256 $ 264 $ 239 DESCRIPTION TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTIMATED JULY 1, 1985 CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GENERAL FUND (CONE.): Parks: Cornelia School - Regrade, Sodding & building renovation R&T $ Normandale- Regrade, fencing, * refurbish and trees R&T Lewis -two tennis courts R&T Countryside school- Regrade, team benches, dugout and fencing R&T Braemar Ccmplex: Football & soccer field - regrade and bleachers R&T * Picnic area R&T McGuire -hard surface play area * R&T Walnut Ridge - Irrigate system & trees R&T * Pamela: Hard surface play area R&T Backstop ,dugouts,benches,fencing R &T Playground equipment R&T * Parking Lot - Resurface R&T Irrigate baseball fields R&T Arneson Acres: * Water and irrigation R&T Lighting * R&T Walkways - garden R&T Remodel garage & greenhouse _ * R &T Conmunity Center -Light tennis courts R&T * weber - Irrigate baseball fields R&T Heights - backstop R&T * Todd: * Benches,plantings, drainage R&T Renovation,parking lot,house removalR&T * Creek Valley School: * Fencing and planting R&T Drinking fountain * R &T Dugout and benches R&T * Light tennis courts R&T Cbowen- curbing, backstop, & fencing R&T Lake Edina: * Fencing R&T Playground equipment R &T Parking lot improvements R&T Regrade & irrigate ballfields R&T * Light tennis courts R&,T 25,000 S 25 50,000 50 40,000 40 20,000 20,000 25,000 15,000 30,000 11,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 5,000 6,000 5,000 25,000 20,000 8,000 2,000 5,000 50,000 10,000 5,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 6,000 12,000 6,000 3,000 6,000 $ 20 20 25 15 30 $ 11 10 10 15 15 5 6 5 25 20 $ 8 $ 2 5 25 $ 25 10 5 4 6 8 $ 6 12 6 3 6 TOTAL PARKS SWIM4ING POOL: Replacement of boards Replace filter system Rennovation pool Seal parking lots Lights TOTAL SWIMING POOL ART CFNrER: Roof Replacement Sealing parking lot Building rennovation TOTAL ART CENTER $1,626,000 $ 415 $ 310 $ 272 $ 150 $ 40 S 58 $ 108 $ 126 $ 117 $ 30 R $ 7,000 $ 7 R 40,000 $ 40 R 60,000 60 R 10,000 $ 10 R 7,000 $ 7 $ 124,000 $ 7 $ 100 $ 10 $ 7 R $ 9,000 $ 9 R 5,000 $ 5 R Y48,000 $ 12 $ 36 $ 62,000 $ 9 S. 12 $ 5 $ 36 TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA JULY 1, 1985 ESTIINITID - __--- _DESCRIPTICN ODDE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GEIERAL FUND (CONT.): Parks (cont): 44th St.- fencing and planting R&T $ 10,000 Yorktown: $ 10 Renovation (dugouts,fencing * team benches,planting) R&T 31,000 Light tennis courts R&T 10,000 31 Garden: 10 * Hockey boards and planting R&T 11,000 * Light tennis courts R&T 6,000 $ 11 Strachauer: 6 * Tennis courts * R&T 20,000 Parking lot * R&T 10,000 $ 20 VanValkenberg: 10 * Improvements Shelter Buildings: R&H 500,000 $ 125 $ 125 $ 125 $ 125 Walnut Ridge R&T 100,000 Garden Park * Wooddale School: R&T 150,000 $ 75 75 100 Demolition building B 100,000 25 25 25 25 Improvements R&T. 100,000 50 50 Parking lot A 100,000 100 TOTAL PARKS SWIM4ING POOL: Replacement of boards Replace filter system Rennovation pool Seal parking lots Lights TOTAL SWIMING POOL ART CFNrER: Roof Replacement Sealing parking lot Building rennovation TOTAL ART CENTER $1,626,000 $ 415 $ 310 $ 272 $ 150 $ 40 S 58 $ 108 $ 126 $ 117 $ 30 R $ 7,000 $ 7 R 40,000 $ 40 R 60,000 60 R 10,000 $ 10 R 7,000 $ 7 $ 124,000 $ 7 $ 100 $ 10 $ 7 R $ 9,000 $ 9 R 5,000 $ 5 R Y48,000 $ 12 $ 36 $ 62,000 $ 9 S. 12 $ 5 $ 36 TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTIMi1TID JULY 1, 1985 DESCRIPTION CODE COST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GUN RANGE: Trap House Trap Equipment Equipment pistol range Renovation building Target equipment * Parking lot TOTAL GUN RANGE RECREATION CENTER (ARENA): New lights Furnace Recondition Icemaking Equipment Ice Resurfacer Floor pavilion *Balcony 6 sidewalk in pavilion Glass Boards Recondition pavilion TOTAL RECREATION CENIWARENA LIQUOR: R $ 5,000 $ 5 R 5,000 $ 5 R 5,000 $ 5 R 25,000 $ 25 R 4,000 $ 4 R 3,000 $ 3 $ 47,000 $ 3 $ 5 $ 5 $ 5 $ 25 $ 4 R $ 10,000 $ 10 R 23,000 S 23 R 20,000 $ 20 R 50,000 $ 50 R 73,000 S 73 R 100,000 $ 100 R 20,000 $ 10 $ R 24,000 10 $ 24 S 320,000 $ 10 $ 23 $ 20 $ 50 $ 73 $ 100 $ 10 $ 10 $ 24 Reseal parking lots E Cash registers E Replace carpeting E Replace heating & air conditioning E 7MAL LIQUOR $ 35,000 $ 10 15 $ 10 50,000 50 20,000 5 $ 15 60,000 15 15 $ 30 $ 165,000 $ 10 $ 35 S 60 $ 30 $ 30 TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTIMATED JULY 1, 1985 DESCRIPTION CODE OCIST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 UTILITIES: Replace lift stations with single Flygt station: Monterey,Grimes,& Englewood E $ 100,000 $ 100 Division Rolling Green E E 30,000 $ 30 White Oaks E 30,000 30,000 30 $ 30 Dakota 72nd & Tracy - emergency power E E 30,000 5,000 $ .30 Replacement of lines: 5 Arden from 50th street south to Bruce Place E 40,000 90 , Bruce from 50th St.south 350 feet E 40,000 Country Club area- replace 40 steps in manhole E 45,000 45 Pull Two Pumps: Braemar & Gleason E 20,000 20 Tower & Alden E 20,000 20 Pamela & Alden E 20,000 20 Brookview Heights & Mirror Lake - replace recorders E 3,000 3 Iialifax & Southdale- replace boost pumps E 3,000 3 Rercof pump houses: Wooddale & Sherwood E 6,000 6 Hanson *New well and p:mrphouse E 7,000 7 E 425,000 _ $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 125 TOTAL UTILITIES $ 854,000 $ 131 $ 131 $ 97 $ 70 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ )25 T s� TEN YEAR CAPITAL PLAN CITY OF EDINA ESTLb91TED JULY 1, 1985 — DESCRIPTION CODE OOST 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GOLF COURSE * Maintenence Building D * $ 250,000 $ 250 Clubhouse Addition * D 600,000 600 Reconstruct- Par three D 350,000 360 Rip Rap on 13 & 17 -water holes E 20,000 Driving Range Building E 129,000 20 Dredging ponds E 45,000 $ 125 Parking Lot E 35,000 $ 45 Upgrade old clubhouse E 45,000 $ 35 Bridge replacement -hole 17 & 18 E 45,000 $ 45 Resurface cart paths E 50,000 S 45 TOTAL GOLF CXRSE $ 1,_565, - - -- $1,230 - --- ---- ---- $ 50 GRAND TOTAL -000 '— $16,995,000 $3,665 _ _ ____ $1,915 $1,649 $1,666 $ 125 �~ $ 45 $ 35 90 $ 45 --'-' - -- $ 45 $ 50 ----- - --- -- $1,615 $1,326 $1,490 $1,433 $1,188 $1,048 CODE A- A:SrSShnjr B- BUDGEr (OPERATING) CD-CLVIL D17MSE (STATE) E- EARNINGS T- TRANSFER (UTILITIES FUND) H -CA!MI ON IM 0-011IER FUND R- RESERVE (WORKING CAPITAL FUND) SA- SPATE AID W- VATERSHED D-DEBT * New Items or Additions NOTE- YEARLY TVrnrc ARE IN THOusmW OF DOLLARS RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina adopted the Comprehensive Plan 1980 on December 31, 1981, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.864; and WHEREAS, the Community Development and Planning Commission of the City of Edina has approved an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 on July 31, 1985; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has reviewed such amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 and is in concurrence with the decision of the Com- munity Development and Planning Commission; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the City Council hereby adopts the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980 as it applies to the Ten Year Capital Plan. ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 30th day of August, 1985. City Clerk TO: Mayor and City Council " FROM: John Wallin, Asst.Finance Director .,A: Kenneth P.osland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: August 19,1985 Material Description (General Specifications): 1984 Citation-II 4 Door Hatchback Sedan Quotations /Bids: Com any Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Iten Chev $6,888.00 2. Jay Kline Chev 7,200.00 3. Suburban Chev 8,011.00 Department Recommendation: Iten Chevrolet for $6,888.00 Finanra Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement/ The recommended bid is �/ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. . N. Dalen, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: r MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AUGUST 13, 1985 _ 9:00 AM Members Present: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Gordon Hughes Alison Fuhr Lois Coon Members Absent: Craig Swanson Staff Present: Joan Waterstreet Staff Absent: Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Others Present: Ronaele Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane Ann Shimer, 5021 Edinbrook Lane Cliff Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane Robert E. Green, 5017 Edinbrook Lane Bob Chadwick, 5113 West 48th Street Mrs. Leo Hughes, 5036 Edinbrook Lane Lorraine Purdy, 5020 Edinbrook Lane Section A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. 1. Request for traffic safety and warning signals at the railroad crossing on West 49th Street near Brookside Avenue. Request received from Cliff Sayre, 5013 Edinbrook Lane and several other area residents. ACTION TAKEN: Cliff Sayre opened the meeting with a request of what the next step was, after petitioning, in order to make the intersection a safer crossing. According to the residents represented, the problem is two-fold: the intersection is marked with stop signs only, at present, and persons ignore the signs; and also the brush and weeds along this intersection drastically impair the vision of the driver who does obey the signs. Bob Chadwick stated that the Soo Line trains frequently blow whistles when approaching, but that this is not always the case. - TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE August 13, 1985 Page 2 Fran Hoffman suggested that the intersection be reviewed by representa- tives of MINDOT to ascertain if flashers are necessary or if.the present traffic control devices were sufficient and also to have the intersection cleared by the City of all excess weeds and brush. Gordon Hughes moved that the brush and weeds be removed by the City and that the Committee endorse the citizen's petition. Lois Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. 1.- Request for restricted parking and signing on Olinger Boulevard at Sherman Circle for Bredesen Park. Request received from Paul Brown, 6137 Sherman Circle. ACTION TAKEN: Fran Hoffman reported certain residents of the area feel that due to noise and traffic, daylight hourly restrictions should be placed on the parking bay• Lois Coon suggested that the new parking area seemed to be alleviating the problem somewhat and that the City should not restrict the park area based on complaints of citizens who moved into that area after the park had been established. Lois Coon moved that the parking bay be left as is and the parking and signing request be denied. Gordon Hughes seconded. Motion carried 4-0. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others. NONE. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney S Council Members FROM: Leslie Turner SUBJECT: REPORT SUGGESTING A PROCESS FOR APPOINTING CITIZENS TO BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS DATE: August 16, 1985 PURPOSE To design a process for recruiting, selecting and appointing citizens to City advisory boards and commissions and report to the Council by August 19, 1985. METHOD A. Survey other comparable cities for information on their process. B. Draft recommendation for review by City staff. C. Revise.draft submitted to Council for approval 8/19/85 and implementation 9/9/85. FINDINGS A. Eight cities were contacted: Minneapolis, Plymouth, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, Eden Prairie, Richfield,.Woodbury. B. Five of eight use an application form; the other three request a letter of interest from the citizen. C. All advertise openings in local newspapers; some also use Cable TV; one also sends notice of openings to civic organizations. D. Seven of eight interview all applicants; in six of seven cities, the whole Council interviews each candidate. E. Most have written information about each board /commission. RECOMMENDATION A. Council solicits applications by article in Sun Newspaper and City Newsletter annually (November) and when needed to fill unexpired term. Article directs citizen to obtain application form from City Clerk's office. Summary information about boards /commissions and application form are given to the citizen. B. Council interviews candidates at 6:00 P. M. before a regular Council Meeting in January (or as needed). Council given copies of applications in packet for that Council Meeting. C. Appointment made at the regular Council Meeting the evening of the inter- views. Terms start February 1 (or immediately if filling unexpired term). D. Current situation: Application form sent to all current candidates 8/20/85; due back 9/1/85; Council interviews and appoints 9/9/85. E. Draft application form and summary information about boards /commissions attached. F. This process applies to filling openings only, not to reappointing present members. August 16, 1985 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Two RATIONALE A. Edina is fortunate to have many talented people to serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council. An open appointments process is critical to tapping that rich resource. B. An application form provides comparable information on every candidate which helps to make an objective decision. C. Interviews are seen by other cities as very helpful to the decision making process. NAME CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS ADDRESS HOME PHONE WORK PHONE NUMBER OF YEARS RESIDENT OF EDINA EMPLOYMENT (Firm and occupation /profession) CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES PREVIOUS PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or appointive) EDUCATION ZIP CODE Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board /commission and why you are interested in serving: APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: Community Development & Planning Commission Edina Park Board Board of Appeals and Adjustments Human Relations Commission South Hennepin Human Services Council Edina Recyling Commission DATE SIGNATURE Heritage Preservation Board. Advisory Board of Health Traffic Safety Committee Building Construction Appeals Board Edina Art Center Board The Edina Foundation Board Feel free to use the back of this sheet - - - Please return to City Clerk's office. INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS TO EDINA'S ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS General Information The City of Edina if fortunate to have.over 100 citizen volunteers serving on its advisory board and commissions. These volunteers directly influence the policies, actions and progress of Edina by serving in an advisory capacity to the City Council. Citizen involvement improves the quality and responsiveness of public decision - making. The City welcomes citizen interest in serving on these boards /commissions. Application forms and additional information may be obtained by contacting the City Clerk's office at 927 -8861. All positions on boards /commissions are appointed by the City Council. Community Development and Planning Commission Meets: 7:30.p.m. Wednesday before._first Monday of the month 3 year term -:.11 members Purpose: Reviews development plans and advises the Council on all aspects of the City's growth and development, including amendments to the comprehensive plan, zoning, platting, changes in streets and other matters of a general planning nature. Edina Park Board Meets: 7:30 p.m. 2nd Tuesday of each month 3 year term - 11 members including member of School Board and member of CDPC Purpose: Develop and review plans for the acquisition and development of parks and recreation - facilities and development of recreation programs and make recommendations to the Council. Board of Appeals and Adjustments Meets: 5:30 p.m. 1st and 3rd Thursday of each month 3 year term - 4 members Purpose: Hear and decide requests for variances to various zoning regulations requested by residents and /or developers. Human Relations Commission Meets: 7:30 p.m. 3rd Tuesday of each month 3 year term - 12 members, including six Council and six School Board appoint- ments /one college /one high school appointment (one year) Purpose: To secure for all residents of the community freedom from discrimination and to advise the Council on human relations and human services issues. South Hennepin Human Services Council Meets: 7:30 p.m. 3rd Wednesday of each month at Creekside Center in Bloomington 2 year term - four members from each of four cities Purpose: Advises City Councils on delivery of human services in South Hennepin area, pursuant to a joint powers agreement between Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. Edina Recycling Commission Meets: 7:00 a.m. 2nd Thursday of each month 2 year term - six members Purpose: To assist and advise the Council on matters relating to the establishment and operation of a recycling center in Edina. -2- Edina Heritage Preservation Board Meets: 7:30 p.m. 4th Tuesday of each month 2 year term - seven members, including Hennepin County Historical Society representative Purpose: To advise the Council on matters concerning identification and preservation of buildings, lands or areas of particular historical, architectural, cultural or educational significance. Edina Advisory Board of Health Meets: On call. Four regular meetings a year 2 year term - 9 -12 members Purpose: Advise, consult with or make recommendations to the City Council (Board of Health) on matters relating to the development, maintenance, funding and evaluation of community health services. Traffic Safety Committee Meets: 9:00 a.m. Tuesday before 2nd Council Meeting Three staff members and two citizen members Purpose: Review requests for traffic control devices and other traffic safety en- hancements and forward recommendations to the City Council. Building Construction Appeals Board Meets: On call. 3 year term - five members, plus Building official plus alternate Purpose: Consider appeals by persons from decisions made by the Building official or the Bureau of Fire Prevention, or the Public Health Sanitarian, in the application of ordinances of the City regulating building construction. Edina Art Center Board Meets: 4:.00 p.m. 3rd Wednesday of each month 3 year term Purpose: Develop and review plans for the development of the Edina Art Center and make recommendations to the City Council concerning art activities and art programs. The Edina Foundation Board of Directors Meets: On call. 3 year term - Nine directors; three appointed by Council, three by the School Board and three by The Foundation Purpose: To provide funding through grants of money and property for community projects which cannot be funded with City or School District dollars. _-O - 0 5400 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, MN August 14, 1985 Mayor Courtney and City Council Members City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Gentlemen, Mrs. Turner and Mrs. Kelly: I am sincerely interested in being considered for the current vacancy on the City's Planning Commission and would be pleased.to answer your questions at Monday evening's Council meeting. I believe in supporting the community through civic activities and currently enjoy working with the following: o. Member of Human Relations Commission since 1979, o Member of the Board of Directors, Executive and Personnel Committees of Storefront /Youth Action since 1984 I am experienced in employee benefit design, planning and financial management and work at General Mills. I have already had some experience with housing planning in Edina. In 1980 I worked for several months with the mayor's advisory committee on housing. The committee developed recommendations, with the strong support of the Planning Department staff, for the mayor and council members to use in preparing the City's Comprehensive Land. Use Plan on Housing. (The committee's recommendations contained options for land use development during the 1980's..) Again, thanks for your consideration. S G i 40 _E) M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: HOMART FINAL E. I. S. DATE: August 14, 1985 On July 23, 1985, the City of Edina submitted the attached letter summarizing its comments and recommendations concerning Homart's Draft E. I. S. These comments and recommendations were in accordance with the Council's direction. Bloomington has now released a Final E. I. S. which is scheduled for approval by the Bloomington City Council on August 26, 1985. This approval is termed the "adequacy decision" and, if so rendered, essentially concludes the environmental review process, except for certain publication requirements, Bloomington is obliged to respond in the Final E. I. S. to all comments and recommendations received from agencies and individuals who reviewed the Draft E. I. S. Bloomington need not agree with the comments and recommendations; they must merely "respond." The following is a summary of the issues raised by Edina and the response contained in the Final E. I. S.: ISSUE 1.4.4. Project violates trans- portation element of Bloomington's Comprehensive Plan. 3.0. Reasonable alternatives not investigated. 3.4. No -build alternative based on unrealistic assumptions. 4.1.3.1. E.I.S. should quantify increase in Metro Council projections. RESPONSE Disagree. Project produces only minor increases in traffic noted in Plan. Disagree. However, F.E.I.S. includes brief analysis of developments of one million square feet and two million square feet. Disagree. No changes in assumptions. Reasons for increasing projections given but request to quantify is not addressed. August 15, 1985 Ken Rosland Page Two ISSUE RESPONSE 4.1.3.2. Projections ignore hotel and Hotel and ancillary uses not significant ancillary uses. More information and can be ignored. No additional needed to compare trip generation information provided. Disagree with other studies. Trip generation that generation is optimistic. - is optimistic rather than worst case. 4.1.3.3. Traffic distribution analysis diverts too many trips away from 494. 4.1.3.4. E.I.S. ignored contribution of traffic generated by other approved projects; e.g. Northland Plaza. Hedberg analysis shouldn't be relegated to Appendix. 4.1.4.1. E.I.S. should provide break- down of traffic volumes as to source. E.I.S. should evaluate ramp terminals. 494 projections arbitrarily reduced from 137,000 to 100 - 105,000. 4.1.4.2. E.I.S. should provide con- clusion of impacts on 494. Disagree. Northland's presence was assumed in .Metro Council projection. Disagree. No breakdown provided. No evaluation provided. Projections agreed to by Metro Council staff. F.E.I.S. cites letter received from MnDOT. In summary, no data, analyses or conclusions have been materially changed by virtue of our comments and recommendations. GH /sw r mw""., g"EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 July 23, 1985 City of Bloomington 2215 West.Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 ATTENTION: RICK GESHWILER Dear Mr. Geshwiler: The City of Edina wishes to submit for your consideration the following comments and recommendations concerning the Draft Environmental Impact Statement ( "D.E.I.S. ") for the Homart Project ( "Project ") at I -494 and France Avenue in Bloomington. 1.4.4. Relationship to Adopted Local and Regional Comprehensive Plans The City of Edina ( "Edina ") disagrees with the finding that the Project is consistent with the Bloomington Comprehensive Plan. This section should be amended to acknowledge that the Project will cause forecasted traffic volumes in Traffic Assignment Zone 823 to exceed those volumes forecasted by the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan. 3.0. Alternatives Edina believes that reasonable alternatives to the Project have not been discussed, particularly alternatives which consider reductions in the mag- nitude of the Project. The three "build" alternatives contained in the D.E.I.S. address only subtle variations in the design and geometrics of adjoining local streets. We do not believe that these are alternatives to the Project within spirit and intent of the Environmental Review Program. A discussion of the subtleties of these various intersection designs may be appropriate elsewhere in the D.E.I.S. but should not.be elevated to the status of "alternatives to the project." The D.E.I.S. should be amended to consider legitimate alternatives to the project. 3.4. No Build Alternative Edina disagrees with the assumptions upon which the No Build Alternative is based. First, we do not believe that the realignment and /or reconstruction of 77th Street, 78th Street and Johnson Drive are contingent on this Project. The inference that these improvements will never be undertaken without the Homart Development disregards the commitment of Edina and Bloomington to. undertake these improvements and ignores Bloomington's ability to secure the necessary right -of -way for these improvements by eminent domain, if necessary. S July 23, 1985 Rick Geshwiler Page Two Second, the assumption that an equivalent amount of development will occur elsewhere in Transportation Zone 823, even if the Project is not developed, has no basis in fact. We disagree with the three stated bases for this assumption. First TAZ 823 is not large but in fact is one of Bloomington's smallest zones. The majority of the zone is in Edina, which imposes vastly different density limitations. Second, we cannot substantiate the market for office space in this zone. Third, we question the availability of other sites within this zone. If such sites are available, perhaps their redevelopment potential should be considered in conjunction with, rather than in lieu of, the Project for purposes of evaluating traffic impacts. In our opinion, the assumption that no adjoining roads will be improved plus the assumption that an equal amount of development will occur elsewhere in Bloomington, north of I -494, between T.H. 100 and France Avenue, portrays an incomprehensible and totally unrealistic basis upon which to evaluate the No Build Alternative. The D.E.I.S. should evaluate the No Build Alternative on the basis of realistic and supportable assumptions. 4.1.3.1. Background Traffic We do not understand the last sentence of this section: "Metropolitan Council year 2000 projections were adjusted upward to account for the difference in trip generation expected for the Homart Development versus that assumed in developing the year 2000 projections." The D.E.I.S. should quantify the difference in the expected versus the assumed trip generation. 4.1.3.2. Trip Generation This section states that: " Homart is not emphasizing the multiple land use - concept and will not propose any reduction in the P. M. peak hour generation rates." Yet, the P. M. trip generations have ignored the 350 -room hotel and ancillary services. The hotel and ancillary services should be included. It is difficult to compare the suggested trip generation rates to other studies and reports. The D.E.I.S. should provide estimates for average daily trips and percent of P. M. peak hour trips to assist in this comparison. A table which compares the proposed trip generations with other.referenced studies would also be appropriate. Based upon,the information provided, Edina believes that the D.E.I.S. presents an optimistic estimate.of trip generations rather than a worst case. 4.1.3.3. Traffic Distribution This section states a desire to analyze the "worst case" example regarding traffic distribution, the worst case being traffic directed to I- 494 /France during P. M. peak hours. The D.E.I.S. states that "no attempt was made to arbitrarily divert trips based on assumed congestion." However, this is apparently what this analysis does. It appears to us that 21% of I- 494 /France oriented trips have been diverted to: 1) Industrial Boulevard & T. H. 100; 2) Southbound France: and 3) Northbound France to CSAH 62. We disagree with the assertion that a worst case analysis has been undertaken when 21% of the traffic desiring to use I- 494 /France has been diverted. We are particularly critical of the assumption that 8% of such trips will use France and CSAH 62, July 23, 1985 Rick Geshwiler Page Three given the present status of those roadways. The D.E.I.S. should, if a worse case analysis is to be made, evaluate traffic distribution with more con- servative trip distribution assumptions. 4.1.3.4. Trip Assignment and Traffic Operations P. M. peak hour traffic volumes include: 1) Existing volumes (1984 MnDOT counts); 2) Volumes from the Project; and 3) Volumes from the proposed Winfield Project in Edina. We are concerned that some developments have been approved, constructed or occupied in the vicinity of I- 494 /France that are not included in the above volumes such as the Northland Plaza Project. The D.E.I.S. should be amended to include traffic volumes from such developments. Other analyses contained in the D.E.I.S., which rely on these traffic volumes, should likewise be amended. The D.E.I.S. conducted an analysis of capacity assuming development of the Hedberg property in Edina. This analysis is contained in Appendix A which is stated to be of information only and not part of the D.E.I.S. Edina disagrees with the statement that the analysis of the Hedberg property is not part of the E.I.S. and is provided for information only. An analysis of this land is in every respect a critical element of evaluating the impacts of the Project and should be included in the D.E.I.S. and not relegated to appendix status. 4.1.4. Alternative Analvsis 4.1.4.1. Methodology This section assigns intersection volumes and provides capacity analyses for the 77th Street and 78th Street intersections with France Avenue. These analyses are shown in Tables and Figures 4.1.4.1. and 4.1.4.2. The basis for the traffic volumes included in these figures and tables is unclear. We believe that the E.I.S. should provide a breakdown of the various components which contribute to the traffic volumes shown on these figures and graphics. In our view, these components are: 1) MnDOT 1984 counts; 2) Developments approved, constructed or occupied which are not included in MnDOT counts; 3) Homart estimated volumes; 4) Winfield estimated volumes; and 5) Hedberg estimated volumes. Each of these components should be.quant.ified to provide the basis for the referenced figures and tables. The D.E.I.S. provides calculations for the I- 494 /France interchange. This calculation should be expanded to include an analysis of the ramp terminals and the impacts on I -494 itself as required by the Scoping Decision. The D.E.I.S. notes that year 2000 estimates by the Metropolitan Council for I -494 are 137,000 vehicles per day. Yet, the D.E.I.S. concludes a more reasonable volume is 100,000- 105,000 vehicles per day. Notwithstanding the comments in the D.E.I.S., we suggest that the D.E.I.S. estimates were arbitrarily determined and have no basis in fact. The Metropolitan Council estimates should be used for analysis purposes or reasons should be stated M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager )!� v SUBJECT: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER FOR BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE ADDITION DATE: August 16, 1985 It is still our recommendation that we use a Construction Manager for the Braemar Clubhouse Addition. At to this memorandum are the duties that a Construction Manager performs before construction and during construction. We feel this will be a cost effective way to remodel Braemar. Although our experience is limited with a Construction Manager, we feel that at worst it will cost no more than the normal approach in using a general contractor. The complexities of the addition to the Clubhouse seem to merit this approach. SUMMARY OF DUTIES OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER UNDER STANDARD FORM OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Preconstruction Phase A. Provide preliminary evaluation of the program and budget, prepare preliminary estimates of construction costs and provide cost evaluations and alternative materials and systems. B. Review designs during development, advise on site use and improvements, selection of materials, building systems and equipment and methods of delivery, and provide recommendations as to overall coordination of the project and cost factors. C. Periodic review and coordination of construction schedules and services of Construction Manager, Architect and Owner. D. Prepare a more detailed estimate of Construction Costs and update and refine them periodically and recommend corrective action if Construction Costs exceed budget. E. Coordinate Contract documents with drawings and specifications and recommend alternatives when construction feasibility, cost or schedules are affected. F. Provide recommendations regarding the assignment of responsibilities of safety precautions and programs, temporary Project facilities and equipment, materials and services for the common use of contractors. G. Advise on separation of various categories of work and the method to be used in selecting Contractors and awarding Contracts and recommend a method of coordinating the various Contractors and to minimize jurisdictional disputes. H. Develop construction schedule as to commencement and completion of construction for each Contractor. I. Recommend a schedule for purchase of materials and equipment and coordinate and expedite delivery of same. J. Analyze and review availability of appropriate categories of labor required for critical phases and recommend actions to avoid labor delays. K. Identify applicable requirements for equal employment opportunity programs. L. Recap mend criteria for bidders and assist with Bidding Documents and informing bidders. ,y M. Assist Architect in receiving bids, prepare bid analyses and recommend awarding or rejecting of bids. N. Assist Architect with pre -award conferences with bidders, assist Owner with preparation of Construction Contracts and advise as to acceptability of Subcontractors and material suppliers. V, SUMMARY OF DUTIES OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGER UNDER STANDARD FORM OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT Construction Phase A. Provide administration of Construction Contracts. B. Provide administrative, management and Construction Superintendent to coordinate the work of the contractor and to carry out the re- quirements of the Agreement. C. Schedule and conduct pre- construction, construction and progress meetings and distribute minutes therefrom. D. Update and reissue the Project Construction Schedule. E. Endeavor to achieve satisfactory performance. F. Revise and refine estimate of Construction Costs and prepare cash flow reports and forecasts. G. Provide monitoring of approved estimate of Construction Costs and identify variances between actual and budget costs. H. Maintain cost accounting records. I. Recommend changes, review change requests and prepare change orders for approved changes. J. Develop and implement procedures for review and processing of payments. K.' Review and coordinate safety programs. L. Assist in obtaining building permits, special permits and approvals from appropriate authorities. Verify payment of applicable fees and assessments. M. Coordinate and obtain services of surveyors, special consultants and testing laboratories. N. Determine acceptability of work, guard against defects and deficiencies in the work and require inspection of the work. 0. The Construction Manager will be responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures of Contractors. P. Resolve questions of Contractors with Architect and Owner as to interpretations of drawings and specifications. r Q. Receive and distribute Certificates of Insurance from Contractor. R. Review drawings, data, samples and other submittals from Contractors and coordinate them with related documents and expedite the processing and approval of such submittals. S. Record and submit written reports on the progress of the project. Keep a daily log on weather, number of workers, work accomplished, problems encountered. etc. T. Maintain contracts, drawings, specifcations and all other pertinent documentation at the Project site. Maintain records of principal building layout lines, elevations of the bottom of footings, floor levels and key site elevations. U. Arrange for delivery and storage, protection and security for materials, systems and equipment. V. Observe the Contractors' checkout of utilities, operational systems and equipment for initial start -up. W. Prepare a list of incomplete or unsatisfactory items and a schedule for their completion, assist in conducting inspections and coordinate the correction and completion of the work. X. Assist in determining substantial completion, prepare a summary of the status of the work of each Contractor and recommend times when uncompleted work is to be completed. Y. Evaluate completion of the work and make recomendations when work is ready for final inspection. Secure and transmit required guarantees, affidavits, releases, bond and waivers and deliveries, keys, manuals, record drawings and maintenance stocks. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the past and can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger of fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring outside the territorial limits of the City of Edina and within the State of Minnesota; and by the suddenness thereof it would be impossible or impractical for the City Council to meet and authorize the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to combat such fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows: The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City Manager or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and in each case the internal needs of the City of Edina and its inhabitants, to dispatch City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to combat such occurrence whether it takes place within or without the City limits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the City Manager or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City of Edina and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equipment, liability insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance and all other safeguards and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment and personnel, shall apply in each case as if specifically authorized and directed by this City Council at such time, whether or not the governing body or authority of the place in which the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence exists, has previously requested and provided for assistance and the use of the Edina equipment and personnel under a mutual protection agreement or other type protection agreement with the City of Edina. FURTHER, the City Manager or his designee shall recall, order and terminate the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their use no longer exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the best interest of the City of Edina. FURTHER, if the provisions of this.resolution shall ever conflict with the pro- visions of the City's Civil Defense Ordinance, Ordinance No. 502, the provisions of said ordinance shall control. Adopted by the City Council on this of , 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DISPATCH AND USE OF CITY EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BY CITY MANAGER IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council finds that instances have occurred in the past and can be anticipated in the future wherein there is a danger of fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrences taking place or occurring outside the territorial limits of the City of Edina and within the State of Minnesota; and by the suddenness thereof it would be impossible or impractical for the City Council to meet and authorize the dispatch and use of City equipment and personnel to combat such fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence; therefore, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows: The Council finds it desirable and necessary to authorize the City Manager or his designee to exercise discretion, considering at all times and in each case the internal needs of the City of Edina and its inhabitants, to dispatch City equipment and personnel as deemed necessary to combat such occurrence whether it takes place within or without the City limits. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that such dispatch and use as directed by the City Manager or his designee shall be fully authorized as an act of the City of Edina and all provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equipment, liability insurance coverage, workman's compensation insurance and all other safeguards and matters pertaining to the City, its equipment and personnel, shall apply in each case as-if specifically authorized and directed by this City Council at such time, whether or not the governing body or authority of the place in which the fire, hazard, casualty or other similar occurrence exists, has previously requested and provided for assistance and the use of the Edina equipment and personnel under a mutual protection agreement or other type protection agreement with the City of Edina. FURTHER, the City Manager or his designee shal -1 recall, order and terminate the use of such equipment and personnel when the need for their use no longer exists, or earlier, when at his discretion it appears in the best interest of the City of Edina. FURTHER, if the provisions of this resolution shall ever conflict with the pro- visions of the City's Civil Defense Ordinance, Ordinance No. 502, the provisions of said ordinance shall control. Adopted by the City Council on this of , 1985. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor 4237C(4) :TSE:081585 � -A ORDINANCE N0. 118 AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF SKATE BOARD RAMPS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Purpose. Pursuant to applicable Minnesota statutes, Edina is now conducting studies for the purpose of considering adoption and /or amendment of official controls, including a zoning ordinance, an accessory use ordinance and a nuisance ordinance. The ordinances or amendments being studied will consider, and regulate and control, among other things, the desirability of, and the size, location, number and kind of, skate board ramps, installed or constructed, or to be installed or constructed, in Edina. However, while the new ordinances and amendments are being considered, proposals for, and applications for permits to allow, construction and installation of new skate board ramps continue to be made. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina, it is necessary and desirable to impose the following moratorium. Sec. 2. Moratorium. From the effective date of this ordinance to and including the first anniversary of such effective date, subject to earlier termination or extension by the Edina City Council, the Edina City Council and the Edina City staff shall not: (1) accept any applications for, or continue to process or issue, any permits of any kind for any skate board ramps; or (2) accept any applications for, or continue to process, any variances from any existing City ordinances for the purpose of installing or constructing any skate board ramps. Sec. 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in the Edina Sun on ATTEST: 3 City Clerk i19P5 Y OF EDINA L� CHECI .ISTER 08 -19- PAGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. P A .O. A MESSAGE_ 10- 4248- 560 -56 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 260 -26 24.95 737.50.:. 3365 F21 21 (18/14/85 0.00 24IRE MCGU ROBERT TREE INSPECTIONS 10 -4200- 353 -30 23100.4 3385 08/14/85 720000 MCGUIRE! ROBERT TREE TRIM INSPECT. 60 -1300- 012 -18 GENERAL SLPPLIES - -- - _ 231U04 08/08/85- ' 90-34 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY rff # #• 23101.8 231004 08/08/85 f•f -CKS w 217026 08/08185 218.95 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 807 -80 08/08/85 217026 08/08/85 39600- BAGGER METER INC CREDIT 40- 4540 - 807 -80 REPAIR PARTS 217026 r,8 /08 /85 134.42 - BAGGER METER INC ------REPAIR PARTS -- 40- 4540 - 807 -80 50 -4262- 821 -82 ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO 43.03 -• [18/C8/05 57.27 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 841 -84 + 231004 ••• -CKS 48.89_ AMERICAN LINEN .1 �1 • 1 1 1 1 "1 0 4 I „ 231CO3 08/13/85 737.50 ALBINSON 10- 4248- 560 -56 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504- 260 -26 24.95 737.50.:. I" 231013 -_ _�- l 2 3100 7 U8/12/85 9, i 23100.4 08/08/85 157.69 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 440 -44 GENERAL SLPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 _ 231U04 08/08/85- ' 90-34 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 6262 - 482 -48 ' ` - 23101.8 231004 08/08/85 164.06 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10.4262- 520 -52 Od/13/85- 08/13/85 + 231U04 08/08/85 3806 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY_ 10- 4262 - 520 -52 _..._._466.72 REPAIR PARTS 231Uj4 08/13/85 - - -J - 438.24 'AMERICAN LINEN - -' - _- - -r LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 821 -82 ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO 231Ui.i4 [18/C8/05 57.27 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 841 -84 + 231004 08/08/85 48.89_ AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 861.86 :~- -- - - -- - -- - -- -- 506.67 - - - - - - -- -- - - - - ##r -CKS 231045 48/13/85 _ - 37925 AUDIO_GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -80 - 231005 18/13/85 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214.862 -86 r 74.50 • .1 �1 • 1 1 1 1 "1 0 4 I „ - CS /13/85 -� 24.95- CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 r #f -CKS 24.95 I" 231013 Qa /13/85 l 2 3100 7 U8/12/85 LL -22.00 APEX PEST CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 231E+13 08/13/85 22.30-* ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SLPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 231U13 08/13/85 91.20 ALTERNINTOI REBUILD GENERAL_ SUPPLIES 10.4504- 646 -64 23101.8 08/13/85 221.97 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 f... 2316C8 y - 231008 Od/13/85- 08/13/85 143.75 - 103.00 KAMAV BEARING B KAMAN BEARING 8 SPLY - -- SPLY REPAIR -PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560- 56 - -�- -- 40 -4540- 801 -80 231013 _ 51..76 _..._._466.72 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 �> 231013- y 231009 08/08/85 851,358.30 ASTLEFORO EQUIP CO CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900 - 300 -30 11090.5 ALTERNAiTDA•REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 859358.00 • y .I #f #frf ##r -CKS .1 �1 • 1 1 1 1 "1 0 4 _r__._.. 231L'12 - CS /13/85 -� 24.95- AUTOMOBIIE�SERVICE C� CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 Y ^ 24.95 I" 231013 Qa /13/85 ALTERNICTbkt REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 340- 30 - - -- `- 67:92 y -. 231E+13 08/13/85 43.68 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SLPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 231U13 08/13/85 91.20 ALTERNINTOI REBUILD GENERAL_ SUPPLIES 10.4504- 646 -64 231013 08/13/85 116.94 AL TER NAiTOR REBUILD) REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 - b +�I 23103 Ob/13/85 39.42 ALTERNA,TC,A REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 -54 54 231013 _ 51..76 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 �> 231013- _08/13/85 Q8/13/A5 83.22 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAiR.PARTS 10 =4540 =560- 56'�"- - W 231013 08/13/85 11090.5 ALTERNAiTDA•REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 .1 �1 • 1 1 1 1 "1 0 4 19E5 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE 231L13 08/13/85 231013 08/13/95 231013 08/13185 -) rr *trr 231015 U8 /^9 /F5 ,I rf ++ ►f 231024 231025 231U26 231026 231026 231026 rr *r *• 231028 CHECK REGISTER 73G.65 08 -19 -85 PAGE 2 AMOUNT VEND0.3 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV* / P.0* A MESSAGE 36.30 ALTERNATOR REBUILD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 !' 28.70 ALTERNATOR REBUILD PARTS_ 10 -4620- 560 -56 - 67.92 ALTERNATOR REBUILD _ PARTS - -- -- _ 40 -4504- 801 -80 T41.11 • 42 *70 ALFOVS ' CONTRACT SEW i 27- 4200 - 661 -66 59639.70 42 *00 + INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 231028 * ** -CKS .T 4,716.0.5 08/08/85 36.34 BADGER 144.JO AT 8 T. INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 144.70 155.54 BADGER _ .._ .. INC REPAIR PARTS , 40 -4540- 807 -80 28/78/85 231028 08/13/85 73G.65 BEER WNOL_SALERS INVENTORY 27- 4630 - 664 -66 + **-CKS 08 /071/8 5 12.45 ARTISTXT INC INVENTORY PRINTING 23- 4600- 610 -61 U6/7,8125 12.45 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 5,7- 4630- 842 -84 231U29 u6 /08185 08/13/85 42 *70 ALFOVS AN)ERSSON CONTRACT SEW i 27- 4200 - 661 -66 59639.70 42 *00 + INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 231028 08/08/85 4,716.0.5 08/08/85 36.34 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 `8/08/85 155.54 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS , 40 -4540- 807 -80 28/78/85 13 *11 BADGER METER INC _ REPAIR PARTS J 40- 4540- 807 -80 - o/97/8S 553.34 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 758.33 + 231J33 03/14/85 * **-CKS 231028 08/13/85 73G.65 BEER WNOL_SALERS INVENTORY 27- 4630 - 664 -66 231U28 08/14/85 1735.35 BEER WHOLE SALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 231U2P U6/7,8125 _ 59659.70 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 5,7- 4630- 842 -84 231U29 u6 /08185 59639970----' - - BEER WWOLESALERS _ _ CORRECTION _ -- 50 -4630- 842 -84 231028 08/08/85 59639.70 BEER WHOLE SALERS INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 231028 08/08/85 4,716.0.5 BE ER_ WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 12841.45 231U29 C8/13/85 _ 128.70 - - BERG 8 FARNHAM CO_ GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30_ 231029 08/13/85 260.00 BERG 6 FARNHAM CD ._ GENERAL SUPPLIES- 10- 4504 - 301 -30 231029 (18/14/85 10.70 BERG 8 FARNHAM CO NO DISCOUNT 10 -4504- 646 -64 399.40 + 231J33 03/14/85 +�- 153.45' 6ERG --6RO TRUCKING w INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 - 231033 08/14/85 445.05 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 231033 08114/85 29351.90 _ _ BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 231U33 08/14/85 29351.90- BERGFORO TRUCKING -� INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 231033 G8/14/R5 351.90 BER8FOR0 TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 rrr + +* r 231035 08/ ^8/85 -~ 326.40 i BOUSTEAD ELEC 8 MFG CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 231035 0h /Q8 /85 193.0D ROUST -RD ELEC 8 MFG CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 231U35 - 08/08/85 _ -"� _ 454.5D _ BOUSTEA'D ELEC 8 MFG CONT REPAIRS 43- 424E - 805 -80_ 231035 08/08185 102.00 - 'BOUSTEAO'ELEC -CMFG - REPAIR PARTS _ 40m4540- 801.80 1 9075.90 1 , 1 J J * **-CKS ..J J J * *• -CKS J J 0 0 1985 Y OF EDINA CHEC! PISTER 08 -19- PAGE 3 °1 - ^CHECK NO* DATE _ — :— AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 INV. Y 4 P.O. -N MESSAGE - (. .• + + ++ ** CKS „I'I 231037 08/07/85 19605.60 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONSTRUCTION 27 -1300- 000 -00 1 9605.60 + 231038 08/14/85 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 . 231039 08/08/85 133.37 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC SAND GRAVEL ROCK 10- 4522 - 642 -64 "i 133.37 • + *r+►r • +.-CKS ,. 231041 06/13/85 -- 97.65 y - BURY "S CARLSON INC - - BLACK TOP­ 10 -4524- 301 -30 ., 231U41 08/13/85 158.PO BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACK TOF 40- 4524- 803 -80 256.45 • ••...CKS � f' I 231046 08/07/85 -- - - - 3.71- -- BLUMBERG P OTO -- CREDIT -� - 10 -4248- 627 -62- _ qw 231046 Ob/',17/85 23.70 BLUMBERG PHOTO CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 627 -62 231046 043/07/85 12.00 BLUMBERG PHOTO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 627 -62 31 999 -� - - -- - - -- — rr +. *• ••• -CKS W, 231053 08/08/85 130.68 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTIN 10 -4250- 301 -30 231U53 08/08/85 43.56 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 446 -44 231053 08/08/85 - - -^ 55.42 BROWNING"FERRIS -- REFUSE _ COLLECTIN 10- 4250 - 520 -52 - - �j I 231053 Q8/08/85 130.68 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTIN 10- 4250 - 540 -54 231U53 08/08/85 43.56 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTIN 4250- 646 -64 231653 08/ ^8/85 141.18 ------- BROWNING FERRIS _REFUSE _ CCLLECTIN _10- 10 -4250- 646 -64 wi 231053 68/08/85 60.00 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSt COLLECTION 20- 4250- 628 -62 231053 08 /0d /85 10088 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTIN 23- 4250 - 610 -66 231053 _ 08/98/85 - - 114.12- BROWNING FERRIS -- REFUSE COLLECTIN 26 -4250- 689 -68 -- - 231053 08/00/85 220.99 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTIN 27- 4250 - 661 -66 ti 231053 08/08/85 1993 BROWNING.FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 27 -4250- 661 -66 231L53 Ob/08/85 - _ �. 1.93- ____-- _ BROWNING_FERRIS~ _ CORRECTICN -27- 4250 - 661 -66 231LI53 C8/C8/85 50.01 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTIN 27 -4250- 662 -66 4 ^i 231053 -- Ob /0E/85 �^ 50.30 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 28 -4250- 708 -70 231053 08 /0B /85 187:77 BROWNING FERRIS 'REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 841- 84 " - - " -- - �� 231053 08/0&/85 399.93 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE CCLLECTIN 50- 4250 - 861 -86 -� - 1,639.05 • _ _ _ _ 231054 Ob/13/85 46.50 BATTERY UAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 231054 - Go/13/85 32.53 BATTERY WAREHOUSE RF_PAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 08/13185 79.50 BATTERY--QAREHOUSE REPAIR- PARTS -10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - ��231054 231054 08/13/85 17.63 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 231054 08/13/85 - 83.16 BATTERY WAREHOUSE_ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 I'I 231054 06/13/85 152.50• BATTERY- WAREHOUSE - PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 _ ..._ 412.12 + i _. - - -- -- - -__.. -- .__. ** -CKS �_. 23105b Q8/14/85 100000, WAYNE.BENNETT POLICE_SERV -_ 10 -4100- 420.42 0 0 1965 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR _ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0.__INV. #__P _A _MESSAGE -__- 1 **• -CKS _ 08/')8/85 340.90 AMBASSb00R SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 664 -66 - _23106^. _231060 231060 _ 08/03/85 _ _ 34 ^.90- _ AWBASSA00R SAUSAGE _ T'CORRECTICN ' 26- 4624- 664 -66 08/08/85 71.50 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 684 -68 231L60 08/08/85 340.90 AmBASS3;DOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS _ _ _ 27 -4624- 664 -66 j 231L'6U Ob /13/85 90.61 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 231060 08/08/85 1717.50 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 231060 08/ ^8185 71.50- AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CORRECTION ._ _ 27- 4624- 684 -68 231060 08/08/85 71.50 _ AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 684 -68 _I. 673.51 • •R* -CKS 231U62 08/13/85 620.00 BROCK YHIT= GENERAL_ SUPPLIES -- 10- 4504 - 343 -30 231062 G8 /08/85 - - -- - - -- 42.25 - - -- BROCK YHITE� - - - - -^ REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 322 -30 - 662.25 `' iff if f _.. _• _ - _ __ - _ *** -CKS 1I 251064 C8/ ^8/85 23.80 THERMAL_ CO - REPAIR PARTAS_ T 10- 4540 - 520 -52 - - - -- -. _ 231064 ^231064 08 /fl8 /8`. _ ._- 13.15 _ THERMAL CO REPAIR PARTS 10-454052052 - - 018 /0185 /85 128.48 THERMAL CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 540 -54 231064 0.8/GB/85 29640 - THERMAL_ CO REPAIR_ PARTS 29 -4540- 721 -72 194.P3 • 231065 018/13185 20.30 ,CULLIGA;N _ - CONTRACT SERV 10 -4200- 482 -48 _ 20.30 * R** -CKS -t 231076 06/12/85 69.00 CARl50N THERMO REtaAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 805 -80 69.00 * */-CKS 231U72 08/12/85 126.48 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING -` -� 10- 4210 - 140 -14 126.48 ' - -- 231073 - - u8 /OT /8`. -T -- 70.70 CITY BEER" INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 231075 08/08/85 17.65 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 ✓!'' 231073 58/OA/85 142.00 CITY -e_ER INVENTORY -_ _ 50 -4630- 862 -86 r1 237.35 JI "1 08/08/95 39.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON__., CONFERENCES___ ___, 10- 4206- 440 -44 _231074 231074 06 /!18/85 ___253 .00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERV 10- 4278 - 470 -47 .289.00 • 231C75 78/14/85 4.00 CLANCY DRUG INC GENERAL SIFPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 '= 231075 U8 /14/85 2.55 CLANCY DRUG INC GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 421 -42 5• 6.55 • --"r-- - - - - ••* -CKS 7 A 1985 Y OF EDINA CHECF ISTER 08 -19- PAGE 5 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE 231078 08/14/85 506.35 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 I' 231078 08/14/85 _ _ _ 828.40 COCA COLA BOTTLING - -� INVENTORYy 50- 4632 - 842 -84 231078 08/14/85 1, ^.9 ^.55 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 I 29425.30 + �I •ttrfa + ++ -CKS 2310 °U 08/13/85 469.38 CONT -MTNN - GENERAL SUPPLIES -'27 -4504- 661 -66 231080 ;8/13/85 3,436.75 CONT -MINN CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 3,906.13 +aafaa *•+ -CKS 231082 U8/07 -/85 - - -- 37.25- CONWAY FILE & SAFETY EQUIP MAIAT 10 -4274- 420 -42 ' - n 37.25 + •� rraa►a -- -- -- -- -- - -. .- - .. - ••*-CKS — - -- - -- - - - - n! 231087 U8/08185 30.63 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482.48 •-• 231087 U8/08/85 - --- - -_ - -- 17.12 _ _ CURTIN MATH SCI -- -- -+ GEN SUPP ---- 4i10 -4504- 482 -48 231L'87 U8/08/85 385.75 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 482 -48 41 2310PI 08/08/85 213.70 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 482 -48 .. - - •• -�- - -- —• -- - — .._ —.___T __ IT .! i- rff4af - - - - - - .. - ._ _- --- -- ._ -- --- � - -- -- raa -CKS 231090 08/98/85 374.86 CERT DOdER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 23109C C8 /08/85 12.55 CERT POWER TRAIN PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 231090 08/08185 _ 137.44 CERT _ POYE4 TRAIN -- _REP.AIR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 23109n U8/08185 38.71 CERT POYER.TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 613.56 a•f • • • , ++f -CKS - 231094 08/13/85 - — ^ 7.93 CASH REIGISTER SALES GENERAL— SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 661 -66 ' 7.93 • 231095 08/14/85 90.78 COMMISSIONER REVENUE __ GASOLINE,_ " - 10- 4612 - 560 -56 +•+ -CKS I_ 231097 08/12/85 - -_- — 44.53 -J� COURTNEtY C VAYNE MILEAGE 10- 4208- 100 -10 231097 J8/12/85 44.53 - COURTNEY C 61ATNE _ MILEAGE � 10 -4208- 100 -10 231U97 U8/12/85 44.53 COURTNEIY .- WAYNE MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 100 -10 ^_ _231097 08/12/85 44.53 C OUR TNnY C 4AYNE MILEAGE 10 -4208- 100 -10 =� 2 31097 05/12/85 44.53= COURfNEtY'C YAYNE ROAD OIl 10 -4208- 100 -10 44.53 ***-CKS 231106 0,8 /14/85 100.00 DAHL- MR HILDING POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 420 -42 •rf -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 6 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT — -, - - -- VENDOR _ _ _ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. p MESSAGE 231108 08 /08/85 32'9.70 DALE GREEN COMPANY SOD BLACK DIRT 10-4562- 353 -30 - 'I 320.30 _._.._ --.. . . - tfflf# +r+ -CKS' 23111f 08/14/85 9109 OAVIDSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 ` 2311 Ir 08 /08185 667.95 DAVIDSEN GIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 756.95 .._ '� •fart• - • **-" KS ' 231114 08/13/85 14.39 DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30 ` 231114 08/13/85 38.19 OELEGARD TOOL CO_ TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 ' 52.58 • - _ - - ".I aa►ria *.**-CKS 231125 03/13/85 138.9n- MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 ` ' 231125 .08/13/85 138.80 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 231125 08/13/85 138.90 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 231125 1:3/14/85 187.60 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540 -54 231125 ^6/14/85 - - — 316.75 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 628 -62 231125 CB /13/85 155.40 _ — MERIT SUPPLY '- -- " - - PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 - _ 231125 06/14/85 180.60 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 26 -4512- 689 -68 231125 Ob/13/85 69.70 MERIT SUPPLY GNEERAL SUPPLY 27 -4504- 661 -66 231125 06/14/95 45P.35 MERIT SUPPLY _ _ CLEANING SUPPLIES - 28- 4512 - 708 -70 ° 231125 fib /14/85 451.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28.4512- 708 -70 1,950.30 • '. 231126 08/14/85 50400 DAVIS_ EUGENE LABOR 60 -4100- 985 -90 231126 08/14/85 27.14 DAVI.S •. EUSE_NE _.- MILEAGE 60 -4208- 985 -90 531.14 + _ -�Y - rfrrrr - ._.....-- - -- --- •-------- - - - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -• -- ---- - -__,- rrr -CKS 231134 08/08/85 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 36.75 • •ffrff • ++ -CKS ?; 231136 06/13/85 974.68 —EARL F- ANDERSEN CONSTRUCTION- -10 -1422- 000 -00 231136 ^8112185 415.'10 EARL F ANDERSEN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231136 CB/13/85 139.92 EARL -F. ANDERSEN PAINT 10 -4544- 335 -30 1,529..3.0 • _ . rrr +ir CKS 231143 08/13185 16903 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 231143 08/13/85 _ Y 146.66 _�- EMRI-CH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 314.69 a _ _ ._ - - -- � fiaffi - 'I'� 231148 08/13/'8'. 23.54 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 560 -56 ` '1965 f OF EDINA I CHECK NO. DATE 231149 Od/12/85 _- i >� 231150 -- " - Ois/08/85'' 23115G 08/08/85 CHECK ISTER 108 -19- 1AGE 7 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE 23.54 * - 400.20 l ESEBERG GOLF CARTS EQUIP RENTAL - - 27- 4226- 660 -66 400.00 * - -30 *15 -------ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS _40 -4540- 804 -80 13 *36 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 804 -80 43.51 • *f* -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * **-CKS *** -CKS **f -CKS i#fifa 231153 08/13/85 - - - _15.63 - ENGINE PARTS - SUPPLY - - -- - GENERAL SUPPLY_— 10- 4504560 -56 - - j j 15.63 • �•� 231154 08/08'/85 498.80 JOE ELIAS SALARY 27 -4100- 663 -66 "� 498.80 * iaf rff 231157 U8/13/85 5,050.30 50TH- FRANC- BUS ASSN RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4200 - 395 -30 F +� r"t ftfrff 231159 08/12/85 102.33 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 810 -80 i 102.33 #f r•f f 231162 06/13/85 143.62 �- FOYL_R ELECTRIC -- - �tEPAIR PARTS" - ^10 --4540- 560 -56 - - 143.62 i 231164 78 /UY3 /P5 41.30 FREEWAY DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 i' 231164 _ Jd/08/85 _ - 18 *00 _ - FREEWAY­DODGE INC -- REPAIR PARTS - - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231164 08/08/85 15.08 FREEWAY DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 231164 08/13/85 11.71 - FREEWAY DODGE INC PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 231164 06/13185 _ 11.71 _ FREEWAY DODGE INC PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 231164 08/13/85 111.71 FREEWAY DODGE INC PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 186.09 # LI•. rrrrr• 231188 08/08/85 - 15.90 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO -- REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 322 -30 231188 08/98/85 36.30 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 646-64 I•r; 231188 u6/t?8185 306.10 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 662 -66 231188 08/14/85 -' - -- -- 709.00 — GRAYBAR-"ELECTRIC CO " CONSTRUCTION 28 -1300- 000-00 231188 Ud/141F5 5*623.24 GRAYBAR'ELECTRIC CO CONSTRUCTION 28- 1300 - 000 -00 231188 08/08/85 5.92 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS - 40 -4540- 811 -80 - 69696.86 231194 08/13/85 EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 301 -30 1910.0 GENERAL- COMMUNICATNS *f* -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * **-CKS *** -CKS **f -CKS 1985 Y OF EDINA CHECK _dISTER 08 -19 -a. PAGE 8 CHECK N0. DATE_ - .!AMOUNT - _ VENDOR _ ITEM_DESC_RIFTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAG_ 231194 08/08185 100.70 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10 -4294- 420 -42 231194 Ob/14/85 17.40 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 440 -44 231194 u8/C03185 377.50 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 440 -44 ! 231104 U8 /1,7/E5 83.50 GENERAL C7MMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10 -4294- 440 -44 .231194 08/13/85 - 266.25 GENERAL_COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 _ ;' 863.65 + 231195 (28/13/85 50.65 GOLF CTR MIDWEST REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 671 -66 50.65 • _ _ _____ -___ - • f r • • f - -- - - *•• -CKS _i 231ZJ6 ')8/14/85 355.39 G B K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 301 -30 231 20 6 JB /14/E5 235.23 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 ` 2312J6 ;8/14/25 385.36 G & K SERVICES _ LAUNDRY - 10- 4262- 646 -64 231206 J8/14/85 206.60 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 801 -80 11,183.08 + ++ -CKS 2312:9 ^8/13/25 1.73 - GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS- � 10 -4540- 560 -56 2312.)9 0.8/13/85 19.66 SENUENE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231219 u6/13/85 -- -_ -_._.- - 10.01 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231 209 Q8/13/85 9.16 _ GENUINE PARTS ' _ REPAIR PARTS '' _ 10 -4540- 560 -56 2312:x9 U8/13/85 15.49 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 23129 G8/13/85 30.10 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 2312J9 08/13/85 26.19 GENUIF #E PARTS - REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2312U9 08/13/85 25.24 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS / 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231209 Ub /13/25 _ - _ 14.58 _ - __GENUINE_PARTS_ REPA_IR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 _ 1312J9 118/13/85 75.42 _ GENUINE PARTS PRTS - - 10- 4620 - 560 -56 i 227.58 • i•••f1,• ... . -- -- _......�..� -_.. .___. - -- - - _ __ ...._ _.._. ._... .__ ••• -CKS 231 21 8 U8 /C8/85 �.. 202.60 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 27- 4618- 662 -66 202.6(2 + �- - - -- -. -- -- f f f f• f . __ -- -- -- - - - •-- -__ _. _ ....... - _ _ _ _ +•• -CKS •I 231220 08/12/85 59.60 HAIR NED LUMBER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 59.60 + •• •f • f + ++ -CKS 1, 231228 Ob /13 /E5 _ 11,384.28 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y _ REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 j 231228 08/13/85 19 ?89.?3 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 _ - - 231228 08/08/85 -_ 5 ^..25 HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 _ 1 2t724. 36 -. -_ - _ - - - - -- - - - - -- - ' - f f r• f f _. -- - -_. 11 231234 06IC7185 6.95 HOOT =N CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 420 -42 231234 C8/07/85 - - 185.60 HOOTEN CL_ANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 - Itz 192.5 5 - f•f -CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR- ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE rl'I 231238 08/13/85 24.00 UM H MCCOY GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30 24.70 • frtttr taf -CKS 231244 08/13/85 100000 HAYDEN MURPHY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 343 -30 231245 ci8/08/a5 35.40 RO8T1T 8 HILL SALT 10 -4538- 440 -44 231245 06 /08/85 42.80 ROBERT 8 HILL SEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 661 -66 _ 76.20 • a.: tf f ►f f f tf -CKS 231248 Uti/13/85 76.36 HARMON GLASS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 i 231248 08/13/85 76.53 HARMON GLASS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 - 152.89 • -- - -- _ ... _ _ .. -- - - - -- - -. - -- -- - - 231249 Q8/14/85 10 ^000 WILLIAM HOFFMAN POLICE SERV 10- 4100- 420 -42 100.00 f tw - '• fftff• • +• -CKS 2S1253 18/13/85 98.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 98.50 + b ftftrt +•• -CKS 231277 D8/12/P5 233.25 -_ — CARLSON PRINTING - - OFFICE SUPPLIES r- 10 -4504- 646 -64 ti 231277 08/12/85 233.25 CARLSON FRPNTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 620 -62 231277 68/12/85 233.25 CARLSDN FpI'NTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 620 -62 231277 Cb/12/85 233.25- CARLSON PRINTING _ OFFICE SUPPLIES _ 10- 4516 - 646 -64 r 231277 Ua /12185 233.25 CARLSON PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 646 -64 \ 233.25 + y 231278 08/C8/85 33.77 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 26 -4504- 684 -68 1312/8 U8 /Q8 /85 16.79 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 26 -4504- 688 -68 50.56 • - ___. -. _. _ . . _ t f f f ► • *► *-CKS -y yi+ 231283 0.8/08/85 60000 JONE4 CMEMICALS INC WATER 26 -4564- 689 -68! 600..00 • y lad frffr• ftf —CKS \ 231289 08/14/85 — 10 0.00 WAITER JOHNSON - 'POLICE SERV - 10- 4100- 420 -42 d i 100.00 • rffftr •ff —CKS 231292 08/14/85 427.00_ HA RRI :S MOMEYER CJ INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 — - - - -- -- --- 427,3D _ —_ fff -CKS •• 1 1985 C OF EDINA CHECK .IS TER 08 -19 -L PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 11 P.O. M MESSAGE 2313U2 08/14/85 49130904 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 231302 08/78/85 5,907.70 KUETHER DIST CC . -_ - _.• -__ INVENTORY _., 50- 4630- 842 -84 10,038.64 *► * * ** - - *** -CKS 231334 O8 /C8 /P5 8.02 KNOB LUMBER CO REPAIR. PARTS_ 10- 4540 - 540 -54 231304 08/08/85 67.49 KNOB LUMBER CO LUMBSER 10 -4604- 646 -64 2313.i4 08113/85 6.79 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 231324 0.6/08185 KNOK LUMB -rR CO LUMBSER 10 -4604- 646 -64 2313.:4 08/13/P5 __153.13 _ 9945 _ _ KNOK LUM9r-R CO _ _ PARTS _ 27- 4620- 662 -66 2313u4 08/14/85 26.72 KNOK LUMBER CO PARTS 27- 4620 - 662 -66 2313:14 US/14/85 76.42 KNOK LUMB --R CO REPAIR PARTS 28 -4540- 708 -70 341.92 * - - - - - -. -• -. * ** -CKS 231307 08/08/85 59776945 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10 -4526- 301 -30 2313,; 7 08 /RB /85 6,723.71 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10- 4526- 301 -30 231 3: 7 06/r8/P5 5,761.12 KOCH ASPHALT RCAO OIL 10- 4526- 314 -30 2313:.7 08/12/85 59513.75 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10- 4526- 314 -30 231307 08/14/85 5,734.54 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10- 4526- 314 -30 - 231377 08/12/85 59703.88 - - _.KOCH ASPHALT -- ROAD OIL " - _ -- 10- 4526- 314 -30 2313,7 Gd/12/85 5,703.88 KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10- 4526- 314 -30 231 3J7 08/13/85 69058.58- KOCH ASPHALT CREDIT PD TWICE 13- 4526- 314 -30 2313:7 US/12/85 59513.75- KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL - - — 10- 4526- 314 -30 2313.;7 08/12/85 59703.88- KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10- 4526- 314 -30 2313'7 CS /12/85 59513.75_ KOCH ASPHALT ROAD OIL 10 -4526- 314 -30 299154.17 -- - -- -- • *r *rr •** -CKS [51311 08/13/85 180.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 27- 4630- 664 -66 231311 08 /C7 185 39165.80 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 5!1- 4630 - 822 -82 231311 L6 /Cl2 /85 39985.00 " ^'~ EASTSIDE BEVERAGE _ INVENTORY— - 50- 4630- 842 -84 231311 08/07 -/85 89949.10 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 16,279.90 • * *• + *• •** -CKS 1511 231317 08 /0H /85 T 186.80 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 322 -30 231317 U8 /r8/85 110.37 LAWSON PR09UCTS GEN SUPP 10- 4504- 322 -30 231 31 7 08/09/85 277.27 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPP 231317 ^8/13/85 _ 555.16 _ LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 1C- 4620 - 560 -56 231317 08/08/85 33106 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 1,460.76 • _ 231 31 8 u8/1-eI85 102.75 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44 231314 Qd /13/85 _ 12.00 -. -__ _•, IEEE ,EROS INC GENERAL 23 -4504- 611 -61 251318 06/08/85 23.35 -, LEEF BROS INC _ -_ _ _ LAUNDRY _ 27- 4262 - 662 -66 138.10 • a7 231319T --' C8/0@/85 1211.00 LEITNER CDMPANT- SANG- 6RAYEL ROCK 14522- 662 -66--_ 0 —_I - • - sa 231319 L'8/01/85 19211.00 -- LEITNLR COMPANY CORRECTION 10- 4522 - 662 -66 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDO; ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV* 0 P.O. 9 MESSAGE 231319 US /ES /85 1,211.00 LEITNER COMPANY SAND GRAVEL ROCK 27- 4522 - 662 -66 ' 10211.00 • ., *rrrrr r** -CKS 231325 08/13/85 292.37 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS . -- 10 -4540- 560 -56 j 292.37 • rrrrrr * ** —CKS 231329 0-8/r•7/85 8,857.70 LANNE MINNESOTA CO CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 89857.00 • - _. - — - - - -- - - - - -- - - . * **—CKS 231336 36/13/85 63.95 LANCE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 63.95 r. 231337 08/13/85 25.52 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 231337 08/13/85 33.56 LAKE STAT= EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 I 59.39 r _. _.__. . r *err* r **-CKS yl' 231339 C'8/08/85 40.78 LAKELAND ENS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 I' 251339 08/08/85 65970 LAKELAND :NG REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 105.78 r —__ rrr*r* * **-CKS 231344 08/'17/85 17.36 M =0 OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 449 -44 231344 G8/C8/85 22.18 MED OXNGE4 B EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510- 440 -44 i 39.54 _ _ r *rr *r *** —CKS �., 231346 0.8/08/85 21,037.50 MET N WASTE C L COMM BLDG PERMITS 10 -3095- 000 -OC 21,037.50 + **+-CKS 231350 - OS /Qp /85 - —21 .00 -____ MILLE0 DAVIS CO ---- •- - -Y- 6EN $UPPLJIES ! 10 -4504- 200 -20 - �, i 21.00 + rrrt *• _.. .._.._.... -- -- - ----..._.. .— ._..__..r---._.. *** -CKS 231353 C8/13/A5 75.29 MINNESOTA GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 231353 _ 06/13/85 ' ' — - 65.55 _ _ _ —! MINNESOTA GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 - 231353 08/13/85 21.42 MINNESOTA GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 �+ 231353 08/13/85 57.60 MINNESOTA GLOVE WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610 - 560 -56 219.77 - _ y n rr*rrr * ** -CKS y ne 231355 06/13/85 65.40 - MINNS0TA SEARING CO PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 r� f.._ CKS 1985 Y OF EDINA CHECK JISTER 08 -19 -,_ PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOOi ITEM DESCRIPTION_ ACCOUNT NOf INV. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE _._ _ I,. 65.40 • •••-CKS 231358 08/14/85 3M ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERV 50- 43C4- 841 -84 _ _ _193.94 193.94 • -- - - -_.. - - -- -- I' 231359 08108/95 41.60 MINN TORO INC REPAIR :PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2 31359 0 08/8/85 23.75 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS— y 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231354 C8/f:18185 4.14 MINN TORO TNC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231359 08/:.'.8/95 188.33 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231359 (16/14/85 30.73 _ _ _ MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 231359 Ub /0E /P5 31.02 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 231359 08 /CB /85 14.33 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 231359 US/12/85 13.41 _ MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS - _ - 27- 4540 - 662 -66 231359 08/12/85 51.76 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 670 -66 397.37 231360 08/12/85 47.10 MTNNES'OTA WANNER GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 231360 08/12/85 50.00 MINNESOTA WANNER PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 231360 08/12/85 16. ^0 MINNESOTA WANNER PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 113.10 + fff -CKS i 231362 08/13/85 824.60 MODEL STOVE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 365 -30 231362 09/13/85 628.88 MODEL STONE COMPANY _ CONCRETE - _ 10- 4528- 301 -30 231362 U8/13/85 628.50 MODEL STOWS COMPANY CONCRETE 40- 45228- 803 -80 2,081.98 • • +* -CKS 231365 08/14/85 103.00 - BERT MERFELD POLICE SERV - 4 10- 4100- 420 -42 100.00 + 231366 L8/0 -A/85 - - 27.70 -- -- MINNESOTA BAR---- - - - - -- -PAPER 'SUPPLY - 231366 78/07185 446.88 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 231366 78 /r9 /85 518.40 _ _ MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 231366 08/071/85 394.27 MINNESOTA BAR - INVENTORY - 50 -4632- 862 -86 19386.55 + ••+ -CKS 231379 08/14/85 5,943.35 _ _ MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 't 231319 UWR /85 79653.96 _ MARK V11 SALES INC _ INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 I'I 2313/8 ub/07/85 119153.63 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 249750.91 231379 08/13/85 35.40 METRO FON= COMM EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 ". 35.40 f ` 2313811 0.8/14/85 99439.87 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10- 4100 - 220 -22 9,439.87 + f.._ CKS 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR — ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO- INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE ~I• 2314'10 08/13/85 1,008.95 NORTRWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES B TUBES 10 -4616- 560 -56 1,008.95 • -- - _ _ L -- f r.rrrr f r.. CKS I 231 4J 6 G6 /CS /85 5.70 NTCC NW REGION REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 2314J.6 08/78/85 49.35 NTCC NJ REGION REPAIR PARTAS 50- 4540 - 861 -86 46.65 rrrrrr _ _ ^ ' rrr••CKS 231412 08/13/85 14.49 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY INVENTORY SUPPLY 23 -1209- 000 -00 14.49 • ■.rrrr rrr —CKS - 231417 08/08185 327.60 OFFS =T PRINTING PRINTING -- T -_ - 10 -4600- 420 -42 ., 327.60 ^_6/13/85 23142 136.55 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 136.55 -� -- -.. - - -- -- - 231421 118/14/85 95.48 OLSON CRAIN 6 CABLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 ar ' 95.48 - rrrrrr ►rr -CKS 231427 06/14/85 199.00 PARTS SUPPLY COT CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 199.00 v rrrr *. rrr -CKS 231 4z Oh/13185 1,250.30 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING - CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 231429 Q8/OA/85 30300. PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 f.. 231429 231419 08/718/85 18/071/85 429.35 632.80 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY INVENTORY _ 50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 2016.25 '--- - -- rrrrrr - --- - --- ---- -___.__.______ ---_ .-- -_.._�- .�...--- -•-- -- -- -_-- .___ -- _..- ----- ._.._._ , -. rrr-CKS -I 231434 08/08/85 61.60 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT 28 -4274- 707 -70 61.60 * - �; rrrra• rrr -CKS Phil 231443 08/07/85 364.]0 POMMER MFS CO TENNIS SUPPLY 10 -6586- 623 -62 36400 rrrrrr rrr -CKS n l 231446 - -- 08/13/85 -• - -�`- •--- 269.76 PIONEER RIM 8 YHEEL -' -- -PARTS •10 -1620- 560 -56- +r °.I 269.76 W, 1 1985 r OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 08 -19 -, 'AGE 14 .I CHECK T NO* DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 11_P.O. N MESSAGE �, fii +.• **+ -CKS I 23145e 08/13/85 23.40 QUICK SSPV EATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231452 06/13/85 45.60 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 f 231452 06/13/85 — 45.60 _ — QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231452 Q8/13185 78.72 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 231452 Q6/13/F5 11.40 QUICK_ SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS_. ___ _. —.• 10 -4540- 560 -56 i 204.72 �i,..l *r *ia• + +*-CKS 'i 231455 08/13/855 22984 RITEWAY REPAIR 'PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 22.84 • , i•t••• * ** -CKS 23146U 08/14/85 - 366.20 _ ROYAL CROWN BEV - INVENTORY ____— 50- 4632- 822 -82 231460 08/08/E5 144 *80 ROYAL CROWN BEY INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 2314611 08/08/85 561 *90 _ ROYAL CROWN B =V INVENTORY - - 50 -4632- 862 -86 I 1 9072.90 + -- -. . I >•� f *ir•i frr -CKS 23146e 06/13/85 89.00 RENTAL EdUIP 8 SALES TOOLS 10- 4580 - 353 -30 89.]0 + 231463 08/14185 1772.40 REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 231463 C8 /14/85 5.499.90 REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 231463 08/14/85 49231 *35 _ — REX DIST — INVENTORY � - 50.4630- 862 -86 - 11.503.65 f•f•r• _ _ -__.. -_ -__- ***-CKS 231470 06/14/85 25.00 OR ROCKWELL MEDICAL SERV 10 -4100- 481 -48 - 25.00 i - -- — - - ff * * ** *r* -CKS 231485 L8106/85 29635.73 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 231485 U8 /C8 /85 ._ 130.50 STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX 10 -3113- 000 -00 I; I 29766.23 :'� ----- -- --- - - - - _. -- - - ---- - - - - - - - - *•ff ** *+* -CKS , 231490 U8/0d./85 16.14 SHERWIN WILLIAMS REPAIR PARTAS 10 -4540- 322 -30 ___23149C U8 /C8/85 43.20 SHERWIN WILLIAMS -* - - -- -- - -- -- ---- -- GEN SUPPLIES - -- - - — - -- -- - -- — . -- 40- 4504 - 805 -80 59.34 l t l ♦ i *• f• *** —CKS I�I 231492 16/12185 128 *00 SOUTHDA;LE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 =I 231492 U8/08185 326 *20 SOUTHDACLE FORD CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 n� 231492 08/08/85 —'� 5.22 SOUTHDALE FORD '— REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 _ ' 231492 09/08/85 9t *42 SOUTHDXLE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 139249.15 56.00 SOUTHT011N REEFRIG E9UIP MAIhT 27- 4274 - 661 -66 56.00 • _ _ _,__ __ ._. . 19F5 CITY OF !:DINA REGISTER SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 08 -19 -85 PAGE AMOUNT _ CHECK NO. DATE (' 231492 J8 /118/85 5.22 231492 U8/08/85 231502 231492 U9 /1'8/85 8*60 231492 - .8/08/85 Ir� - - -- 231495 U8 /C7 /85 36.62 231493 U8/ ^8/85 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231493 u8/ ^7-/85 8979 SOUTHDA;LE FORD i 231495 Ub/13/85 139249.15 56.00 SOUTHT011N REEFRIG E9UIP MAIhT 27- 4274 - 661 -66 56.00 • _ _ _,__ __ ._. . 231502 CHECK REGISTER SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 08 -19 -85 PAGE AMOUNT VENDOR 2315; 1985 Y OF EDINA CHE01 jISTER 08 -19- PAGE 16 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P *0. # MESSAGE ' *** -CKS • **-CKS • ** -CKS • ** -CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS + ** -CKS • ** -CKS c t *►9999 * ** —CKS �^ 231551 48/14/85 361 .06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 420 -42 66.12 r �• frrtr• I 231516 US/08/F5 24.33 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 231516 .:,8/03/85 -- -- -_ - -- 9T.46^ SEARS ROEBUCK - - TOOLS --�— _ —'10- 4580 - 301 -30 231516 U8/08/85 24.30 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 231516 08/13/85 175.41 SEARS_ROEBUCK TOOLS -4580- 801 -80 321 .50 + ___40 •i R *Rr *• 231524 Ud /08/85 358.45 TURNOUIST PAPER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 358.45.* *•rfrR - 231527 OS/�18/85 _ 41.10 ~_ _TAYLOR SALES' CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 684 -68 h 41.10 231530 O8/13/85 . 318 *00 TEXGAS CORP GENERAL 10- 4504 - 301 -30 I T- 318.00: __ --- - -- --- -- - _._.__. _ ._. �..__ 231537 U8113/85 474.00 TRI ST4;TE DRILLING REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 805 -80 231537 08/13/85 474 *30 TRI STATE DRILLING REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 805 -80 231537 U6/13/85 688.00 _ TRI STATE DRILLING REPAIR PARTS l40- 4540 - 805 -80 19636.00 23.1.5.39 ).8/14/85 282900 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY &_BLACK DIRT 27- 4562- 662 -66 -` - 282.30 _ I r f f • • r 231542 08/07/85 159037.41 THORPE DIST INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862-86 '��._. _- - -- . - • _ _ _ _ . _ -_ 15 9037.41 • �__ _ _ __._ - --- _ _ _ -- . - - - - -_ __ -_� — - . -__ _._ -- +rR +rr 231545 08/13/85 41.35 _ TMIN CTY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARTS '--10-4540-540-54 I,I 41.35 + 231548 J8/14/85 _ _, _- 177.75 __CITY. ., _ - _ ADVER7ISIN6..__- �23- 4214 - 610 -61 177.75 • *** -CKS • **-CKS • ** -CKS • ** -CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS + ** -CKS • ** -CKS c t *►9999 * ** —CKS �^ 231551 48/14/85 361 .06 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 420 -42 1 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 17 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT _ _ - VENDOR - _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 4 P.O. ft MESSAGE �! 231551 08/14/85 920.15 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10 -4266- 421 -42 +i 231551 C8/14/85 49.95 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 422 -42 19231.18 _.. __. 231553 08/08/85 56.29 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 322 -3C 231553 OF/03/85 198.44 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 231553 ^b /n..8/85 91.40 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS - _ 10- 4540 - 520 -52 231553 Ob/08/85 32.14 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 231555 .l6/ ^8/85 45.92 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 231553 Cb/08/85 141,09- ELECTRIC CORP _ REPAIR PARTS-------'- 10 -4540- 540 -54 „i 231553 08/C.8/85 177.25 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 231553 U8/(1.8185 1.26 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231553 U8 /CS /p5 35.32 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231553 f)8/C6/85 93.22 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231553 U / ^_.8/85 158.37 UNIT =D ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 231553 08/08185 - 20.77 -- UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS - - -' 10- 4540- 646 -64 �i. 231553 U18/ ^8/85 67.50 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231553 U8/!?8185 41.54 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 231553 Cb / ^18/85 49.22 UNITED ELECTRIC CURP GEN SUPPLIES _ 40- 4504- 807 -80 �. 231553 08 /C8 /85 221.48 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 807 -80 231553 08/08/85 88.85 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 231553 C8 /0a/85 - 326.70 - - -UNITED ELECTRIC CORP -� REPAIR PARTS - -` - - -- 40 -4540- 801 -80 - �' 231553 08/m/85 68.22 - UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT 40- 4540- 801 -80 231553 Ub/08185 182.51 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTAS 50 -4540- 861 -86 231553 C8/C8185 6.15 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS - _ 50- 4540- 861 -86 u 231553 U8 /r8 /85 24.44 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540 - 861 -86 19991�.C4 • �„ +taraa • +• -CKS 231558 08/13/85 120.00 GOODYEAR CONTRACTEC REPAIRS � 10- 4248- 560 -56 23155a u8/13/85 120.90 GOODYEAR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 240.70 • `,, •araaa • +• -CKS 231569 08/0/85 316.49 VALLEY IND PROPANE GASOLINE _- J J 28- 4612- 707 -70 ^i 316.49 + •+ • � • • - -__ ..-. - -- � -_ ... -- - - -_. -, aaN CKS -._-- 231572 08/13185 442.38 VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUPPLY 50 -4514- 822 -82 231572 U8/131F5 741.49 VAN ?8PER CO PAPER SUPPLY 50 -4514- 842 -84 I' 231572 08/13/85 908.55 VAN PfAPIER CO PAPER SUPPLY 50 -4514- 862 -86 2,,092.42 • arraar aar -CKS 231575 08/12/85 19114.96 WATER PR63UCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 19114.96 + - - - - +s. -CKS 231 578 08/13/85 _��i 104.45 YM.H.ZIEGLER _CO INC- PARTS_, 10- 4620 - 560 -56 v v 1985 OF EDINA CHECK STER 08 -19 -8 AGE 18 .J CHECK NO.. -_ DATE AMOUNT T_ VENDOq _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 _ INV. # P *0- # MESSAGE 104.45 231579 08/13/85 - 34.72 WILLIAMS STEEL -WDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES — 10 -4504- 301 -30 231579 06/13/85 31.63 WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 231579 08/13/85 34.02 WILLIAMS STEEL- HOVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 _ 231579 08/13/85 -� _ _ 27.63 WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE -- _ _ GENERAL'SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 231579 08/68/85 195.84 WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 323.14 /frrlf * **-CKS 231582 08/08/85 — 467.60 GORDON SMITH Cd _ GASOLINE 27 -4612- 662 -66 467.60 • AAkf #♦ - - *** —CKS 231586 u3/O8/85 294.98 W W GRAINGER GEN SUP_P 10- 4504 - 520 -52 _ 2315956 08/14/85 294.72 Y W GRAINIER ^.T REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 449 -44 231586 08/08/85 58.73 Y W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 231 586 08/08185 97.45 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS _ 10 -4540- 540 -54 2315p6 _ 08/L8/85 _ -_ _ 120.25 W W GRAINGER REPPIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 231596 U8/C8/85 17.76 Y W GRAINGER REAPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 L 883.19 rfrl*f *** -CKS 231590. 08/14/85 100.110 HENRY WR03LESKI POLICE SERV _ 10- 4100 - 420 -42 10 0,.0.0. 231591 08/14/85 - 61.87 _CECELIA SMITH MILEAGE JUL- AUb - 10 -4206- 140 -14 61.87 * - *** —CKS 2316.73 !18/14/85 *35 _ _ WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY _ . _ _ - -- -- - _RANGE BALLS 27- 4636 - 663 -66 - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - _ — ._210 210.35 * J 1frlfr * ** —CKS 231613 :^8/13/85 74.25 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 ' 231613_ 06/13/85_ 92.78 _ PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 - -- -- - - -� - -. _ 167.03 * �MCNEILUSSTEEL aflrr# *** -CKS 231700 06/07/85 377.79 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 231 10r.1 OS/!�8/85 608.58 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 32- 842- 8 4 23170^, J8 /07- -/85 �T! _ 706.09 �^ NORTHSTAR ICE — -----50-46 INVENTORR 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1,692.46 2317ii1 78/07/85 468 *JO DAY DIST -. INVENTORYu -- '� - -50- 4630- 862 -86 468.'70 S: — ...._�.....�.._.-.� "-- 231 lO2 _s_ ilb/D7J85���- _ _ __ 4,945.00'�'� -. ____ LAKE RE STORATION_ FERN.ITS 10.4310- 35830 231772 08/13/85 100000 LAKE RESTORATION PERMIT 10- 4310 - 358 -35 ' 1985 CITY OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 19 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 59045.00 * 231/:,5 Ub /n7 /85 622.50 BARRETT MJVING CONT SERV_' 10- 4200- 500 -50 �. 622.50 * 231 704 0810 -AIB5 R - _- 845.00 ROBERT C KINGHORN -- - CONSTRUCTION ' 10- 1422 - 000 -00 - ' - j�j 845.00 + 231705 98/UT/85 165.25 PREF -_RRED PRINTING PRINTING - 10 -4600- 627 -62 165.25 + 23170 6 nb /C7/85 - - �- 826.00 a -CHAMP IAN - - - GEN SUPPLIES--- T!" - -27- 4504 - 662 -66 - - '- „ " 826.00 + 231707 Ob/14/95 721.45 RTN INC CONTRACT SERV -� 1C- 4200 - 510 -51 2317`)7 `b /(77/85 19377.33 RTV INC CONT SERV 10 -4200- 510 -51 W �--' 231 70 8 231 7^ G 231-110 231 711 231 71 2 v 231 71 3 29098.78 U8/C7/85 15.00 SARA ANTONI'A LI REFUND TENNIS 10- 3500 - 000 -00 15.00 J6 /07/85 15.00 DIANE SMITH REFUND TENNIS 10 -3500- 000 -00 15.00 + 08/07- -/85 15.00 KATHr PEDERSON REFUND 10 -3500- 000 -00 15.00 + 78/07/A5 109. ^2 BOB G?EIG MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 1D9.D2 + On /CT /85 19.95 EDINA XTHLETIC ASSN PODL SUPPLIES 26 -4504- 688 -68 19.95 * 08/07/85 75000 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS TEEN CENTER 10 -4504- 627 -62 750.0.0 * ,r 131714. U8 /Oa /85 15.00 MARILYN FISCHBEIN REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 i 15.00 + ...I i 231715 x8/07/85 50.30 FEDERAL EXPRESS DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 i- SQ.�70 W •r * **+ * * * -CKS 231717 (18/08/85 141.54 - MTNVALCO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 141.54 �? ^� -�COND 231719 08/08/85 511.00 =LASER SERVICE _ CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 50.00 * 231719 08 /08/85 - 12.30 6BLACK 8 ]ECKER CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248.560 -56 12.3D * °- 231720 - -- 08/08/85' - -' 12.66 -" - GENtRAL ELECTRIC REPAID PARTS 140= 6540-- 801 -80� - �; if 12.66 v' c� 1985 Y OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 08 -19 -. PAGE 20 a _- CHECK _N0._DATE _ AMOUNT VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 231721 Ud/08/85 39231.47 FEED RITE CONTROLS WATER_ - �- 40 -4622- 805 -80 231721 18/08/85 626.79 FEED RPTE CONTROLS -_ _ _ WATER 40- 4622- 805 -80 39858.26 + G 7; ` 231722 08/09185 - -- 16.80 AM R_D CR]SS- ._'- __ - - -_ -1ST AIO Sl°FPLIES_- T 26- 4510 - 688 -68- 16.80 • E 231/23 IW13/85 66.35 WM J WA;LSW MEETINGS - 10 -4202- 420 -42 66.35 + = 231724 08/08/85 - 134.51C RUTTGERS BAY LAKE CONFERENCE- - - 10 -4202- 460 -46 134.50 * - 231725 G8/C8/85 250.50 EDLNA PET HOSPITAL KENNEL SERVICE _ 10- 4278 - 470 -47 250.50 231726 08/O8/E5- - - - -�� 54.82 KAPAK CORD, RADIO EQUIP 10- 4914 - 422 -42 -- - 54.82 231/27 Ub/ 118/85 83.70 MPH INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 231727 08/ ^0/85 51.45 MPH INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 134.45 - _ 231128 U8/C8/85 5.321.10 HENN CTY TREASURER ROOM & BOARD 10 -4286- 220 -22 5.321 .10 • - - _ _- . _ . 231129 .78/08/95 237.84 SHERIFFS DEFT ROOM 8 BCARO 10 -4286- 220 -22 237.84 + 231730, 08 /P-R /85 49.99 UNITED STORES UNIFORM ALLOWENCE 10 -4266- 421 -42 49.99 + 231731 Ud/ ^8/85 197.57 METRO MECH CONTRACT REPAIR'PART§ 26- 4540 - 689 -63 197.57 231732 0.8/p8/85 150.66 L L DIST SYSTEM CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 684 -68 150.66 231733 08/08185 60.00- KRISTOFOR SCHOELLER CORRECTION 10- 4120- 438 -42 231735 06/1-9/85 60.00_ KRISTOFOR SCHOELLER BICYCLE SAFETY 10- 4120- 438 -42 231733 08/08/85 _ - 15.00 ___KRISTOFOR _ SCHOELLER - BICYCLE SAFETY 10- 4120 - 438 -42 15.00 + 231734 08/09/85 60.00 PAT J SEYK.O WAGES 10- 4120 - 439 -42 231734 18/08/85 60.00- PAT J SEYKO CORRECTION 10 -4120- 439 -42 231734 36/08/85 60.00 PAT J SEYKO BICYCLE SAFETY 10- 4120 - 439 -42 _ 60.00 • - -- - I'' 231735 U8 /OS /85 ._ _ 67540. AM TEST CENTER_ EQUIP, MAINT 10- 4274 - 560 -56 1 _ 675.00 + a° 231736 78/08_/85 43.41 ART SIGN MATERIAL_ GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 688 -68 I-^ _ _.. 43.41 _ _ • _ - - - 231757 178 /q8 /A5 15.00 SUSAMME JISSEU.46 -5 REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -19 -85 PAGE 21 v! CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE _ _ II( Iy 15.0D r . 231/58 UK /(18/85 15.00 KAREN SOMERS REFUND TENNIS -- 10- 3500 - 000 -00 15.00 r f 231739 08/78185 - -- - __._ --18.00 - - -` -- CgARVA:RD M_DICAL -_ - - -- SUBSCRIPTION — --10- 4502 - 440 -44- "�P� 18.00 !c C 231740 98/ ^8/85 442.25 OAVES FOOD WAGON CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 442.25 + 231741 08/58/85 215.90 __ -- CARLSON FRINTING - GEN SUPPLIES - -- v -- 10- 4504 - 520 -52 - vI 231141 08/08/85 593.80 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 500 -50 609.70 • ..l 231742 08/ "8/85 114.75 LIEN CHEMICAL COMP SERVICES 27 -4236- 661 -66 -- - _ - 114.75 -- -` - • __ - - — - _ _ -MILEAGE _ - �- 231743 08/08/85 66.70- LOWELL MCCARTHY 10- 4208 - 600 -60 66.70 r - - -- - -- -- - -._. vI 231744 96/08/85 116.00 AM PLANNING ASSOC DUES 10- 4204 - 120 -12 — 116.00 • v 251745 U8/08/85 50.00 MN PLANNING ASSOC MPA DUES 10- 4204 - 120 -12 I 50.70 • 231746 U8/13/85 119.11 E 2 GO TEXITRDN REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 671 -66 231146 08/08!85 34.82 E Z GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 671 -66 1 53.93 231747 08/18/85 46.54 TWIN CITY ELEVADTOR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 46.54 + - - - -- 231148 08/08/85 2950 RC IDENTIFICATIONS GEN 8 SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 - - - - -- 2,50-*'- L 231749 08/08/85 266s00 FRIOEN ALCATEL SERV CONTRACTS 10- 4288 - 510 -51 t 266.'70 . - 231750 48/08/85 175.00 ACME WINDDW CLEANING CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 375 -30 1� V 23171 08/08/85 736.93 XEROX DUE +IRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 736.F3 + _ _..-. — 231752 (16/08/85 14202 CITY OF RICHFIELD SPEC ASSSSESS 40- 1110 - 000 -00 _ 142.1 2 — - - — - - - - - — — - - - - - -- - ,J 231753 08/08/85 4.88.51 KENNY BOILER 8 MPG CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 708 -70 488.51 r _ " 231/54 ici /08/85 3,775.67 FRANK B HALL 8 CO INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 v .231755 08/08/85 ,' _ 389..80 � RON LJUND � _ -.. .__.AUCTIONEER FEE �, - 10- 3350 - 000 -00 - 69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` -- �" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66 d O - - 15.00 + 0 1985 OF EDINA 08/12/85 CHECK ISTER BONZELEIT 08 -19 -1 AGE 22 r_ t CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT , -- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 23 -4200- 610 -61 231764 ud/12/85 389.80 + BONZ_LET ART CNTR OeTTERY 23 -42CO- 610 -61 yJ 231/56 _6/8/85 450.16 JIM HATCH SALES CO GEN SUPPLIES 4 10 -4504- 646 -64 231756 c8/C8185 75.15 JIM (HATCH SALES CO TOOLS 10-4580- 301 -30 d n 525.31 • +• + + +• 08112/85 25.50 6RDER PRT6 COST ART CNTR .•. -CKS 231/58 Ub/12/85 1.000.']0 TESSMAN SEED CHEM SEED _ - - 10 -4568- 353 -30 . 231766 .- _ - __ U8112/85 19000.00 + -PAT - A ^-- N.AIRE POOLS CHEMICALS - 26- 4564 - 689 -68 r �- � 231759 08/12/85 � 959.00 � - �TRUSSBIILT _ CONTRACTED REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 231167 U6/12/85 950..0.0 + CUSTOM P03LS INC CHEMICALS - 26- 4564- 689 -68 23176U 08/12/85 314.32 THOMAS --& ASSO INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 r 231768 Od/12/85 _ - 314.32 + P 8 H WAREHOUSE SALE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 I`I 'i. -- 231761 Ob/12/85 - -- -- - 4.62 WIN STEPH_NS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 }1 231761 Ob/12/85 51.50 WIN STEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231761 08/12/85 26.06 WIN STEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS__ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231761 06/12/85 56.75- WIN STEPHENS BUICK CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 231761 18/13/85 268.10 WIN STEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 231761 -38/12/85 16. ^.7 WIN STEPHENS BUICK REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 _ - - " - 309.60 + - 231762 08/12/85 184.25 M.R. SIGN COMP - GUARD RAIL__MTRL 10- 4546- 340 -30 184.25 231763 08/12/85 _15.00 KATHY - STIEHM _- _TENNIS REG REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` -- �" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66 d O - - 15.00 + 231764 08/12/85 238990 BONZELEIT ART CNTR POTTERY 23- 4200 - 610 -61 231764 08/13/85 6,2380C BONZELeT POTTERY ART CENTER 23 -4200- 610 -61 231764 ud/12/85 6,238.30- BONZ_LET ART CNTR OeTTERY 23 -42CO- 610 -61 231764 08/12/85 238.13 BONZELET ART CNTR POTTERY 23- 4200 - 610 -61 231764 08/13/85 _ 238.00, -- BONZELET - POTTERY ART CENTER 23- 4200 - 610 -61 238.00 • 231765 08112/85 25.50 6RDER PRT6 COST ART CNTR 23- 4600 - 610 -61 25.50 + •- -� . 231766 .- _ - __ U8112/85 - - ^- - 16 *98 -PAT - A ^-- N.AIRE POOLS CHEMICALS - 26- 4564 - 689 -68 16.98 + 231167 U6/12/85 25.90 CUSTOM P03LS INC CHEMICALS - 26- 4564- 689 -68 25.90 r 231768 Od/12/85 _ - 169.43 P 8 H WAREHOUSE SALE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 I`I 169.43 }1 231769 36/12/85 - 320.20 TH GARAGE DOOR PLACE REPAIR PARTS y 27- 4540- 662 -66 320.30 + 69 231T7Q _ 08/12/85 206.25 ZACKS INC -� LUBRICANTS - 27- 4618 - 662 -66 ` -- �" 23117n 08/12/85 129.']9 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66 d O 1985 CITY OF EDINA NANCY KARKHOFF CHECK REGISTER ti h,I 08 -19 -85 PAGE 23 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV* # P.O. I MESSAGE �. •� 23117P, J.6/12/85 99.20 ZACKS INC PARTS 27 -4620- 662 -66 10 -4504- 421 -42 90.37 * 434.45 * 06/13/85 9.73 231771 08/13/65 300.10 ROB NELSON TENNIS INSTR 10- 4200 - 623 -62 06/13/85 300.00 * THE MIRROR PLACE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 390 -30 231772 J8/13/85 100 *00 BETH BERTELSON TENNIS INSTR 10 -4200- 623 -62 B A ROSE MUSIC CO HUSK SUFPLY 10- 4596- 500 -50 100.00 204.25 * 231773 i6/13/85 215.00 INTERN C04F BLDG OFF ED E CODE CONF 10 -4202- 490 -49 92.50 * 215.00* '16/13/85 137.93 vl, 231774 18/13/85 195.00 SHERRY GRABINSKI AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 195.00 35.12 LAND CARE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 231775 231775 -� - -- 231775 231775 231776 231777 231178 231779 �.? w 08/13/85 231 78Q NANCY KARKHOFF 231 781 ti h,I 231 782 i 231 783 t i^i 231784 J8/13/85 231 785 �. •� 231736 10 -4266- 420 -42 - 231 787 �.? w 08/13/85 36.00 NANCY KARKHOFF LIQUOR LICENSE 10 -3033- 000 -00 08/13/85 20.28 NANCY KARKHOFF PARKING EXP 10 -4206- 422 -42 J8/13/85 - 1.54 - - -' NANCY KARKHOFF POLISH - - -_ _ - -- 10 -4266- 420 -42 - U8 /13 /9c, 32.55 NANCY KARKHOFF MEALS- UPS - BATTERIES 10 -4504- 421 -42 90.37 * 06/13/85 9.73 GAS SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504- 301 -30 9.73 * 06/13/85 50 *22 THE MIRROR PLACE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 390 -30 50.22 * 08/13/85 204.25 B A ROSE MUSIC CO HUSK SUFPLY 10- 4596- 500 -50 204.25 * 06/13/85 92 *50 STERLING SUPPLY INC GENERAL SUPPLY 40- 4504 - 803 -80 92.50 * '16/13/85 137.93 GARLANDS INC GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 137.93 * 08/13/85 35.12 LAND CARE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35.12 * 96/13/85 75.00 IAAO DUES 10 -4204- 200 -20 75.00 * 08/13/85 20.00 CITY OF ST. PAUL FEES 10 -4202- 420 -42 20.00 0:8/13185 60.00 EDINA SPIN CLUB CONTRACT SERV 10- 4200 - 500 -50 60.0.0 * 08/13/85 32.00 KAREN KELLY SWIM REGISTR REFUND 10 -3500- 000 -00 32.00 ;6 /13/85 35 *00 MN SOCIETY OF CPAS MEETING 10 -4202- 160 -16 35.00 * G8/13/85 30..3D STATE TREASURER DUES 10- 4204 - 500 -50 19P5 Y OF EDINA CHECi G1STER 08 -19 -, PAGE 24 ,; - - CHECK - -- NO. DATE _- ._ AMJUNT - ...30.7 VENDOR __- -- - - -- - -- - ITEM_ DESCRIPTION - - ----- - ACCOUNT NO* INV* # P.O. f MESSAGE � I.� ® + I•� 231766 08/13/85 23.37 VECTOR ONE EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 I! I 23.37 * 231789 - V8113185 - !- 127.00 --1 -' -,- NELSON RADIO COMM - PARTS - - -�- ' - - - -- - -10- 4620- 560 -56 127.00 231790 '18/13/85 29586.72 LABOR RELATIONS CONTRACT SERV 10- 4200 - 140 -14 2x586.72 * F 231791 U8/13/85 18.75 CI TV OF HDPKINS _ GENERAL- SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 I 18.75 * 231792 7b/13/P5 88.40" GENERAL BINDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 88.40 * 231193 Ub/13/85 V 647.50-' _ CONCEPT MICROFILM - -- GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 - ';� 64.50 j 231794 06/13/P5 39424.75 BERGERSON B CASWELL REPLACEMENT CK - r - 60- 2040 - 000 -00 j° 39424.75 + 231 795 08/14/85 10.25 - -- - -.ICMA T -- - " -BOOKS 10- 4502 - 140 -14 10.25 • 231196 U6/14/b5 100.00 ZAHLS EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS -� 10- 4540 - 646 -64 231796 ,:.b/14/85 4,015.00 ZAHLS EQUIP CO CONSTRUCTION 27- 1300 - 000 -00 ,. 49115.00 23179/ U8/14/85 15070 SALLY SYNHALVSKY TENNIS REG REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 15.00 231798 08/14/85 13.18 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 13.18 * I; 231799 U8/14/85 71 *00 PLTNEY BOWES POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 71.30 • _ - +'I 23180(I 08/14/85 35.70 LAWT)N PRINTING INC BLDG CODE TAB SETS 10 -4204- 490 -49 t 35.70 231831 C8/14/85 284.22 HUDAK PRIVTERS PRINTING 27- 4600 - 660 -66 284.22 * _ 2318 "12 Oo/14/85 79.25 CANS REGISTER SALES EQUIP MAINT 27 -4274- 663 -66 - -- __ ^ - - - - -- .79.25_* 231803 08/14/85 168 *60 BRAEMAR QUICK PRINT PRINTING 27- 4600 - 660 -66 - "I 168.60 * 2318::4 O.b/14/85 169406.00 POLAR CHEVROLET PAYMENT 10 -4900- 260 -26 169409.00 + 2318C5 08/14/85 25x879.21 PROGR CONTRS INC PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 a. 4 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK PEGISTER 02 -19 -85 PAGE 25 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. I P.O. 4 MESSAGE = 259879.21 * 231806 Jo/14/85 639168.72 BURY B CAR.LSONS INC PAYMENT - '60- 2040 - 000 -00 639168.72 + ' 231817 1111/14/85 369981.74 " RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC PAYMENT- .__ - - 60- 2040 - 000 -00 i� 369981.74 + f?j 231 80 8 Ub /14/85 669934.43 BROWY B CRIS INC PAYMENT' 60 -2040- 000 -OG 669934.43 + 231 8D 9 08/14/85 149250 *10 -CARL BOLA'IDER B SONS PAYMENT WOALE � 60- 2040 - 000 -00 149250.30 • 23181 9.8/14/85 434.00 PEGGY CAROLE PREPARE DIGEST 10 -4200- 140 -14 434.20 * T 231b11 08/14/85 100.00 MN SOCIETY OF CPAS CONF &'-SCHOOLS 10 -4202- 160 -16 -; 100.00 * 231812 '28/14/85 25.00 RAT CINK MACHA DUES 10 -4204- 480 -48 _. : 25.00 * I r *rrr • - - - -- ** * -CKS 231814 Ob/14/85 33.80 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 642 -64 33.80 * _... 231815 08/14/85 8.00 ICMA FLSA REPCRT 10- 4572 - 440 -44 8.00 "�. 231816 08/14/85 19 ^.00 PHYSIO CONTROL CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 231810 ub /14/95 396.20 PHYSIO CONTROL FIRST AID SUPPLY -� 10- 4510- 440 -44 586.20 * 231817 Uts/14/85 17.60 L J RU3BER STAMP CO GENERAL SUPPLIES------- 10- 4504- 440-44 17.60 * f 231818 08/14/85 19625.00 DAVE OLIW_R TREE REMOVAL - -�� 60- 1300 - 002 -18 I 19625.0.0 + �^ � 231819 08/14/85 _ - 670.00 !'KC GROVES TREE' EKP - - - -_ TREE- REMOVAL - - - -_ 60- 1300 - 002 -18 - 670.00 231820 48114/85 200 ARTWORK SOLD ART WORK SCLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 :�•; 231820 48/14/85 2.10 ARTWORK SOLD ART WORK SCLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 231820 08/14/85 2.10- ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 _ 2.10 + - - - -- -- 231821 '38/14/85. _ _ ._ 2.10. .._ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SCLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 _I 2.10 _ ..___ • 231822 '18/14/85_ -_ 39.90 ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SCLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 i 9n T 39-9T _- `� -, _ 231823 08114/85 �� - �W_ 2. 80 _.__.,,..._- __A.RTWORK_SOLD, -, ._�ARTWORK SCLD � 23 -3625- 000 -00 �.i .I tie ' 1985 r OF EDINA I.I 231831 I~h/14/85 27.75 CHECI ;ISTER ., OP -19- PAGE 26 d:I 231832 '16/14/85 464.JD ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50 k. 464.00 • ' CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT L VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE 61910 FUND 20 TOTAL 2.80 785.17 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER �- �• 1.529.15 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 231824 ,6/14!85 22.40 ARTWORK SJLD ARTWORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 FUND 29 TOTAL ^I 199662975 22.40 • 1169594.43 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 431 — 231825 08/14/85 -- — -- 3.15 -_ -- ARTWORK SOLD - - — ARTWORK SCLO 23 -3625- 000 -00 - ,,. I 3.15 + 231826 08/14/85 31.50 ARTWORK SJLD ARTWORK SOLD _ 23 -3625- 000 -00 31 .50 • !'` - -- 231827 08/14/85 29.40 -_a— ARTWORK SOLO - - - - - -ART YORK SCLD - - - -- 23- 3625- 000 -00 29.40 • 231528 Ua/14/85 7.00 ARTWORK SOLO ARTWORK SOLD - v - 23 -3625- 000 -00 7.00 • - -- 231829 u8/14185 -- — 28,0.0 —'~- ARTWORK SOLD - ARTWORK SOLD T23- 3625- 000 -OC - :, 29.00 . 231630 08/14/95 105.43 ARTWORK SOLD ARTWORK SCLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 108.00 • I �.i .I tie ' — 5 _. I.I 231831 I~h/14/85 27.75 ARTWORK SOLO - CONTRACTUAL SERV '- 23- 4200 - 610 -61 ., 20.75 • 231832 '16/14/85 464.JD ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4200 - 500 -50 k. 464.00 • -- - - CKS L 232,087.24 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 61910 FUND 20 TOTAL 785.17 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER �- �• 1.529.15 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 199994.38 FU40 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 99207.41 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND _ - w., 29.40 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 199662975 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 1169594.43 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 431 214,184.99 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND a, -- - - - — 6149134992- -- -- -TOTAL �.i .I tie ' Y 5 _.