HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-11-04_COUNCIL MEETINGi
R
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
NOVEMBER 4, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of Joint HRA /Council Meeting of October 7, 1985 approved as submitted or
corrected by motion of , seconded by
I. Resolution to Correct an Error in Description of Property Within the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment District
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of September 16 and October 7, 1985, Joint HRA /Council
Meeting of October 7, 1985, and the Budget Meetings of September 16, 17, 23 and 25,
1985, approved as submitted by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Final Plat Approval
1. Warden Acres Austin 2nd Replat - Generally located south of Grove Street
and east of Oak Lane
2. Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition - Generally located north of Green Farms
Road extended and west of Ridge Road
B. Program for a Multifamily Housing Development - Grandview Development Corp.
C. Amendment to Years X and XI Urban Hennepin County Community Development
Block Grant Applications
D-. Set Hearing Date (11/18/85)
1. Preliminary Plat Approval
a• Barbara W. Feiler, 5201 Duncraig Road - Generally located north of
Vernon Avenue and north of Duncraig Road
b. Developers Construction, Inc., 6224 Interlachen Blvd. - Generally
located north of Interlachen Boulevard and east of Blake Road .
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department or Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to
proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Vacation of Utility and Street Easements — Dewey Hill Third Addition
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV.' 'AWARD OF BIDS
A. Braemar Golf Course Club House - Bid Package #2
B. One Four Wheel Drive Articulated Loader (Continue to 11/18)
C. One Computerized Diagnostic Engine Analyzer
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Suburban Hennepin Regional Park District Report - Marty Jessen
B. City Hall Space Study Report (Continue to 11/18)
C. Edina Centennial Celebration - 1988
D. Recommendation for Issuance of On -Sale Wine License - Szechuan Star Restaurant
E. Set Hearing Date - Vacation of Utility Easements - Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1,
Meadow Lane II Addition (12/2/85)
F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Agreement with MN Department of Public Safety for Loan of PBT Instruments
B. Sanitary Sewer Connection HC -10 - 6528 Maloney Avenue
C. Resolution to Correct an Error in Description of Property Within the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment District
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
VII. FINANCE
* A. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by , for payment of the
following claims dated 11/4/85: General Fund $210,181.01, Revenue Sharing
Fund $10.00, Park Fund $22.50, Art Center $1,091.88, Golf Course Fund
$24,506.34, Recreation Center Fund $3,943.99, Gun Range Fund $67.44, Utility
Fund $18,513.84, Liquor Dispensary Fund $943.80, Construction Fund $3,978.85,
Total $263,259.65
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Monday Nov 4 Regular Council Meeting
Monday Nov 11 VETERANS DAY - City Hall Closed
Friday Nov 15 Edinborough Groundbreaking
Monday Nov 18 Regular Council Meeting
Thurs Nov 28 THANKSGIVING DAY - City Hall Closed
Friday Nov 29 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING DAY - City Hall Closed
Monday Dec 2 Regular Council Meeting
Monday Dec 9 Special Council Meeting - Accessory Uses
7:00 p.m. Council Room
5:00 p.m. 7101 York Av
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Conference Rm
Monday Dec 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Rm
i %
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 16, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
RESOLUTION OF WELCOME ADOPTED. Mayor Courtney introduced the following resolution,
and Member Turner moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION OF WELCOME
TO THE SUZUKI CHILDREN OF JAPAN
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proud to be the host City for two of the concert
appearances of the Suzuki Children from Japan and special events occuring all
day on Saturday, October 5th; and
WHEREAS, we encourage the Suzuki Group and their-escorts to sample the many
cultural offerings of our City and area during their visit; and
WHEREAS, we extend our appreciation to the Studio Grand for making it possible
for the Suzuki Children to appear in our City, and for enabling our youth to
enhance their musical appreciation and knowledge; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina and its Chamber of Commerce fully support and foster
the exchange of artistic talents throughout the world.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, that the Mayor, the Council
and the citizens of Edina welcome the Suzuki Children from Japan to the United
States, and with the Chamber of Commerce, we extend the City's hospitality,
congeniality, and warm wishes for a pleasant visit and every success in their
concert appearances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON NUMEROUS ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were pre-
sented by Acting City Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Due
notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as
hereinafter recorded on the following proposed assessments:
1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A
Location: Hansen Road from Vernon Avenue to West 60th Street
Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -137A
showing total construction cost of $114,437.20 proposed to be assessed against
5,122.26 assessable feet (Single Family) and 24 multi units, at $20.00 per
assessable foot (Single Family) and $574.00 per assessable multi unit, against
estimated assessment of $20.00 per assessable foot (Single Family) and $574.00
per assessable multi unit. Jim Fosen of 5704 Hansen Road presented a formal
objection to the proposed special assessment of $6,896.20 on his property. His
objections were: 1) to the amount of the assessment based on the irregular size
and shape of the lot; 2) lack of reimbursement or replacement of numerous trees
removed without his consent; 3) lack of replacement of boulevard trees; and
4) loss of parking on Hansen Road 24 hours a day. Engineer Hoffman commented
that there are boulevard trees that need replacing. Member Richards suggested
allowing $1,000 to pay for-the trees, only if the contractor )Midwest Asphalt
Corporation) backs up this cost so that the City does not assume this respon-
sibility. Member Richards also suggested adjusting Mr. Fosen's assessment to
approximately $4,500, based on reducing the assessable footage by one - third.
No other objections were heard, and no additional written objections to the
proposed assessment were received prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Reso-
lution later in Minutes.)
2. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352
Location: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition
3. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368
Location: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition
4. GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141
Location: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition
5. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -174
Location: Arthur Street in Mendelssohn 2nd Addition
Improvements listed under 2, 3, 4 and 5 above affecting the same properties, public
hearing was conducted concurrently. Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for
Watermain Improvement No. W14 -352 showing total construction cost of $2,992.68
proposed to be assessed against four assessable lots at $748.17 each, against
estimated assessment of $1,137.76 per assessable lot, to be spread over three years.
Analysis of Assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -368 was given as total
construction cost of $4,353.52 proposed to be assessed against four assessable lots
at $1,088.38 each, against estimated assessment of $1,574.79 per assessable lot, to
f
9/16/85
be spread over three years. Analysis of Assessment for Grading and Graveling
Improvement No. C -141 was presented showing total construction cost of $4,414.12
proposed to be assessed against four assessable lots at $1,103.53 each, against
estimated assessment of $1,102.87 per assessable.lot, to be spread over three
years. Analysis of Assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S. -174 was
given as total construction cost of $11,440.40 proposed to be assessed against
four assessable lots at $2,860.10 each, against estimated assessment of $2,401.98
per assessable lot, to be spread over three years. No objections were heard,
and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto.
(Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
6. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -25
Location: Between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Avenue
Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Street Lighting Improvement No.
L -25 showing total construction cost of $379.00 proposed to be assessed against
four assessable lots at $94.75 each,.against estimated assessment of $91.00 per
assessable lot,.to be allocated to taxes due and payable in 1986. No objections
were heard, and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received
prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
7. STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -26
Location: Corner of Ashcroft Lane and West 63rd Street
Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Street Lighting Improvement No.
L -26 showing total construction cost of $855.00 proposed to be assessed against
four assessable lots at $213.75 each, against estimated assessment of $210.00 per
assessable lot, to be allocated to taxes due and payable in 1986.. No objections
were heard, and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received
prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
8. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85
Location: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District
Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -85
showing total construction cost of $31,590.98 proposed to be assessed against
289,030 square feet of assessable units at $0.1093 per assessable square foot,
against estimated assessment of $0.11 per assessable square foot, to be allocated
to taxes due and payable in 1986. No objections were heard, and no written ob-
jections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto. (Assessments
levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
9. SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC -9
Location: 6128 Abbott Avenue
Mr. Rosland presented Analysis of Assessment for Sanitary Sewer House Connection
No. HC -9 showing total construction cost of $4,383.00 proposed to be assessed
against one lot, to be spread over six years. No objections were heard, and no
written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto.
(Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
Following presentation of Analyses of Assessments, Member Richards introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING AND CONFIRMING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed
assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such hearings
held September 16, 1985, has considered all oral and written objections presented
against the levy of such assessments.
2. Subject to the amendment made in paragraph 3 of this resolution, each of the
assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the
City Clerk for the "following improvements:
Street Improvement No. BA -137A
Watermain Improvement No. WM -352
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -368
Grading Improvement No. C -141
Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S. -174
Street Lighting Improvement Nos. L -25 and L -26
Maintenance Improvement No. M -85
Sanitary Sewer House Connection No. HC -9
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot, tract
or parcel of-land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby adopted and
confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective improvements to
be spread against the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land described therein.
3. Said assessments are hereby amended as follows: Street Improvement No. BA -137A -
the assessable footage for Part of Lot 6 and 7, Garden Park (32- 117 -21 -14 -0053)
shall be reduced by one - third.
4. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of said
installments, together with interest at a rate of 10.2% per annum on the entire
i
9/16/85
assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1986, to be payable with the general
taxes for the year 1986. ,The number of such annual installments shall be as follows:
Name of Improvement Number of Installments
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. 137A 10 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -352 3 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -368 3 years
GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -141 3 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -174 3 years
STREET LIGHTENING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -25 1 year
STREET LIGHTENING IMPROVEMENT NO. L -26 1 year
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -85 1 year
SANITARY SEWER HOUSE CONNECTION NO. HC -9 6 years
5. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a
copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with each
then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the
tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
6. The Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessments which may be payable
by a county, by a political subdivision or by the owner of any right -of -way as
required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4, and if any such
assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City Treasurer shall arrange
for collection thereof in installments, as set forth in said section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen -, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A9 GRANTED FIRST READING; R -1 TO R -2 ZONING FOR FOLKE VICTORSEN
(6101 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Acting Clerk,
approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen explained that the subject pro -
perty measures 195 feet in width and 137 feet in depth and contains 26,805 square
feet. The property is zoned R -1 and was, until recently, developed with a single
dwelling. The house was removed prior to application for rezoning and subdivision.
The proponent, Mr. Folke Victorsen, had submitted a preliminary plat which would
create two lots each being 97.5 feet in width and would contain 13,343 and 13,462
square feet of area respectively. The Zoning Ordinance requires that R -2 lots be
90 feet in width and contain a minimum of 15,000 square feet. Consequently, each
new lot would need a lot area variance to become a buildable lot. Mr. Larsen
pointed out that there are 29 lots between 60th Street and the Crosstown Highway
east of France Avenue; 22 are zoned and developed R -2 lots with the remainder zoned
and developed as single dwelling units. Lot widths for the R -2 lots range from
75 feet to 100 feet, with an average lot width of approximately 86 feet. Lot areas
average slightly over 11,000 square feet. On the west side of France Avenue,
properties north of the subject site are zoned R -1 and properties to the south are
zoned R -2. Lot sizes are similar to those found on the east side of France Avenue.
Mr. Larsen further explained that the Comprehensive Plan shows the subject property
as Low Density Attached Residential, and double bungalow development- is included in
this designation. Mr. Larsen concluded that the resulting lots will be similar in
depth and slightly wider than neighboring R -2 -lots. The new lots will be compatible
with and will not alter the symmetry of the neighborhood. The proposal is also
consistent with policies established in the Comprehensive Plan, and staff supports
the proposed rezoning and subdivision. Mr. Folke Victorsen was present, and he
indicated that he was planning on living in one of these units. Member Richards
had concern that these buildings would turn into four -unit dwellings, therefore
having to grant another variance. No further comments being heard, Member Turner
introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A9 for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE N0. 825 -A9
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 20, Town-
ship 28 North, Range 24 West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as
follows: Beginning at a point distant 442.7 feet North of the Southwest
corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 and on the West line
thereof; thence East and parallel with the South line of said Southwest
1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 a distance of 170.0 feet; thence North a distance
of 195.0 feet; thence West a distance of 170.0 feet to the West line of
said Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4; thence South along said West line
a distance of 195.0 feet to place of beginning, EXCEPT that part of the
Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 20, Township 28,
9/16/85
Range 24 describedas follows: Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot
10, Block 1, Edina BelAir 6th Division; thence Easterly along the North
line of said lot to the Northeast corner of said lot; thence North two
and seven - tenths feet; thence Westerly to the point of beginning. ALSO:
The South 2.3 feet of that Part of Lot 4, Block 1, Edina BelAir 6th
Division, lying Westerly of the following described line, to -wit:
Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence Northerly in a
straight line along the Westerly line of said lot and an extension thereof
to the most Northerly line of said lot. ALSO: That part of Lot 4,
Block 1, Everth, described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest
corner of said lot; thence Easterly along the South line of said lot
to the Southeast corner thereof; thence Northerly along the East line
of said lot two and three - tenths feet; thence Westerly to the point of
beginning."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for First Reading.of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Ordinance granted First Readong.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR FOLKE R. VICTORSEN SUBDIVISION. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen explained that this is the same property which was just changed from
R -1 Single Dwelling District to R -2 Double Dwelling District. No further
comments being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR FOLKE R. VICTORSEN SUBDIVISION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat.entitled "Folke R. Victorsen Subdivision," platted by Cardarelle
and Associates, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
September 16, 1985, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen informed the Council that the proposed plat is located north of Green Farms
Road extended and west of Ridge Road. This plat represents a portion of approx-
imately 70 acres of vacant land which the owner, Carl .Hansen, is developing for
single dwelling .lots on an incremental basis. In 1978, the Planning Commission
and City Council approved a preliminary plat for the entire property, and today
approximately 129 lots remain from this preliminary plat. Mr. Larsen explained
that Mr. Hansen has submitted a plat illustrating 16 lots involving 7.902 acres.
Lots range from 15,396 square feet to 20,046 square feet in area. All of the lots
conform to the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen pointed
out that the plat .shows the extension of Green Farms Road northerly to intersect
with adjacent property owned by Mr. Loufek. This property has received a pre-
liminary plat approval which illustrates the further extension of Green Farms Road
to intersect with Interlachen Boulevard.. Mr. Larsen continued that the City's
Engineering Department has reviewed the plat and has recommended modifications to
the proposed road grade. They have also recommended the installation of a storm
sewer to serve this property and adjacent property to the north. Mr. Larsen
concluded that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat conditioned upon
a developer's agreement which satisfactorily addresses the road grade and storm
sewer issues. The plat is consistent with the overall preliminary plat approved
earlier, and the lots are generally consistent with other lots in the area. No
further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption, subject to a satisfactory developer's agreement:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition," platted by Carl M. Hansen,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 16, 1985,
be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
9/16/85
PRELIMINARY PLAT DENIED FOR INTERLACHEN HEIGHTS. Affidavits of Notice were pre-
sented by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
explained that the proposed plat is located west of Ridge Road and north and south
of Interlachen Boulevard. The applicant's subdivision plan proposes 20 R -1 lots
for the property, and Lot 7 of the proposed plat would be retained for the existing
home. The proposed lots are very large, ranging from 17,500 square feet to
34,900 square feet with an average of 23,000 square feet. Mr. Larsen explained
that the request had been continued to allow the proponent time to resolve the
issue of the extension of Green Farms Road north to intersect with Interlachen
Boulevard. The proponent has submitted no new plans or information relative to
the revised plat proposal. Staff's position relative to the road is that it should
be extended, but Staff recommends denial of the revised preliminary plat. Mr. C. W.
Loufek of 6600 Interlachen Boulevard was present and indicated he was disappointed
that they had not moved ahead with this as originally proposed to the Planning
Commission. There being no further discussion, Member Bredesen moved denial of
this preliminary plat proposal for Interlachen Heights;,the motion was seconded
by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE AT 6364
DEWEY HILL ROAD. Planner Larsen explained that the City of Edina has submitted an
application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a major
addition to the clubhouse at Braemar Golf Course. Clubhouses are considered a
Conditional use in the R -1 District. Mr. Larsen indicated that construction would
begin in the fall and be completed prior to spring opening. The proposed addition
will enlarge most existing areas and add a meeting room with a seating capacity of
approximately 200. The lower level will contain enlarged and remodeled locker rooms
and new lounges. On the upper floor, the existing clubhouse area, grill and kitchen
will remain unchanged. A new main entrance will be provided at the northeast corner
of the building. The pro shop will be expanded to house offices for the course .
manager and pro. The new meeting room will be situated to the south of the existing
building. Mr. Larsen added that exterior modifications will include additional
parking and regrading of the first and tenth tees immediately west of the clubhouse.
Following this regrading, the tees will be visible from the clubhouse. The design
and materials of the addition will match the existing clubhouse. Mr.-Larsen
pointed out that clubhouses are required to provide parking spaces equal in number
to one -third the maximum seating capacity, plus one space for each employee on the
major shift. Following the expansion, there will be seating for approximately
275 with 15 employees on the major shift. Current parking of 275 spaces is.well
in excess of the required 107 spaces. Further, an additional expansion of the
parking lot is planned which will provide 100 more spaces. Mr. Larsen concluded
that staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit. No further comments
being heard, Member Richards offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825
have been satisfied.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby.grants a,Condi-
tional Use Permit to the City of Edina, Braemar Clubhouse, 6364 Dewey Hill Road,
for the purpose of constructing a major addition to the existing clubhouse at
Braemar Golf Course and expanding the parking lot.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR JAMES W. NELSON AT 3922 -30 WEST 492 STREET APPROVED.
Planner Larsen informed the Council that the subject property measures approxi-
mately 118 feet by 125 feet and is 14,750 square feet in area. The property is
developed with a building containing a gross floor area of 8,000 square feet.
The building has ten private parking spaces on the north side with the remainder
of required parking provided by the municipal lot and ramp. Mr. Larsen added that
the proponents have submitted a request to add a,second floor to the.building which
would approximately double the floor area of the building. The property is located
within the 50th and France Tax Increment District. The original plan for the
District limited expansion potential to certain designated properties in the District.
This property was not designated as having expansion potential. However, in 1978
9/16/85
the HRA adopted a policy which spread development potential more evenly throughout
the District. The policy stated that expansion up to a floor area ratio (FAR) of
1.0 should be permitted using existing public parking to satisfy parking requirements.
Expansion between 1.0 and 1.5 FAR (the maximum permitted in the PC -2 District)
would be permitted only if additional private parking was provided. Using the
Zoning Ordinance definition of gross floor area, the FAR, following the proposed
addition, would be 0.97. Mr. Larsen explained that properties within the District
were originally assessed for parking on the basis of existing floor area plus -any
expansion potential. The policy adopted by the HRA in 1978 required that properties
not originally shown with expansion potential which expand in the future should be
assessed for parking on a square foot basis. The proposed expansion would be subje.
to $2.155 per square foot assessment for public parking. Mr. Larsen continued
that the proposal calls for continuing the wood facade of the existing building
on the 492 Street side and stucco on all other walls. Areas which are currently
unfinished cement block would be covered with stucco. Mr. Larsen concluded that
this property.was one of several in the District identified by the HRA with expan-
sion potential. To date, none of these properties has undergone an expansion.
Conditions in the District have changed little since the HRA adopted its present
policy towards expansion. The request conforms to the HRA's policy, and staff
recommends approval of the Final Development Plan. There being no further dis-
cussion, Member Bredesen moved adoption of the following resolution:
RFS(1T.TTTTM
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final
Development Plan for James W. Nelson at 3922 -30 West 492 Street, presented at the
regular meeting of the City Council of September 16, 1985, be and is hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Courtney
Abstained: Turner
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR MAIL HANDLING, INC., AT 7225 WASHINGTON AVENUE SOUTH
APPROVED. Planner Larsen explained that the subject property was originally
developed as a roller skating rink. When the present owner acquired the property,
he converted it to its present mail processing and envelope- making operation.
This conversion included an up -grade of the exterior finish. Mr. Larsen continued
that the owner has submitted a request to construct an addition to the east side of
the building which would contain 8,235 square feet. Since the site is less than
three acres (2.12), the maximum allowable lot coverage is 30 percent. The proposed
addition would increase the lot coverage to 31.5 percent; thus, a 1.5 percent lot
coverage variance is requested. Mr. Larsen pointed out that in the Planned Industrial
District required parking is determined by totaling the requirements for individual
uses or one space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, whichever is greater.
Applying the requirement for individual uses, a parking requirement of 59 spaces
results. However, at one space for each 400 square feet of gross floor area, a
requirement of 73 spaces results. The proposed plan proposes a total of 68 spaces;
thus, a five -space parking quantity variance is requested. Mr. Larsen added that in
addition to a site plan, a landscaping plan and exterior elevations have been sub-
mitted. The proposed exterior materials would have to match the existing building,
which is split -face concrete block; the materials conform to the requirements of the
Ordinance. The plan does,not indicate the size of existing and relocated plant
materials, and the new stock appears to be below Ordinance minimums. Mr. Larsen
concluded that the owner's attorney, Peter Beck,.described the proposal in a letter
which provided justification for the request. In staff's opinion, the impact of
the additional lot coverage is not significant on this particular property, and
staff supports the requested lot coverage variance. Staff recommends approval of
the Final Development Plan and the lot coverage and parking variances with the
following conditions: 1) The addition be limited to warehouse - storage use; and
2) The landscape plan be subject to staff approval. The owner of Mail Handling,
Inc., Mr. Tom Silver, was present and had no comments. There being no further
discussion, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption, subject to the two aforementioned conditions:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final
Development Plan for Mail Handling, Inc., at 7225 Washington Avenue South, presented
at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 16, 1985, be and is hereby
approved, subject to the conditions that the addition be limited to warehouse -
storage use and that the landscape.plan be approved by staff.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
9/16/85
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 10, 1985, APPROVED. Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as
listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of September 10, 1985:
1) That the requested signal be installed at Cahill Road and West 78th Street
conditional upon the State's acceptance of Edina Warrants and the eligibility
of State aid funding for the project;
2) That a NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER sign be installed fifty (50) feet north of the
frontage road entrance to the Community Center parking lot;
3) That NO TURN ON RED, 7 -9 AM, 4 -6 PM, signs be installed at the intersection of
northbound Grange Road at West 50th Street and regulatory signs be erected at
the north and west entrances to the .Edina City Hall parking lot indicating
NO THROUGH TRAFFIC; regulations should be instituted after December 1, 1985;
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT ON ACCESSORY USES REFERRED TO CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION. Mr. Rosland
pointed out the results of staff's examination of accessory uses in residential
areas. The report regarding structure contains items which are addressed pri-
marily in the Zoning Ordinance-. The section regarding vehicles and miscellaneous
is primarily controlled through the Nuisance Ordinance. To a lesser degree, the
Animal Control, Swimming Pool, Antenna and Garbage Ordinances are involved. Mr.
Rosland indicated that this report could be referred to the Planning Commission
for review of the.recommendations and then return the study to the Council.
Another possibility would be for the Council to get together in a study session.
Member Bredesen suggested that the Planning Commission begin first with their
review at the October 2 Planning Commission Meeting and then the report could be
brought before the Council in a study session on the second Monday in November.
This suggestion was supported unanimously, and there was no further discussion.
COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES CONTRACT FOR 1986 -1987 APPROVED. Mr. Rosland reminded
the Council of their agreement on May 20, 1985, that it would be beneficial to enter
into a two -year contract for Public Health Nursing Services in Edina. This had
come about at the urging of the Edina Health Advisory Committee and was based on
the premise that the delivery of these services should be coordinated with the two -
year Community.Health Services planning cycle. Bid specifications were mailed out
to Methodist Hospital, Fairview Home Health, Park Nicollet Clinic, Metropolitan
Visiting Nurse Association and Bloomington Division of Public Health. On August
28, 1985, the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee met to review
the submitted bids for the provision of Public Health Nursing Services in Edina
for 1986 and 1987. Bloomington and Fairview were the only two agencies who had
submitted bids, and these bids were as follows:
1986 1987
Bloomington $ 82,500 $ 86,500
Fairview $111,425 $121,735
Mr. Rosland indicated that the present contract :with Bloomington is $78,500, and
he informed the Council that the Committee had voted to recommend Bloomington for
award of the 1986 -87 contract. Sharon Aadalen, Chair of the Edina Health Advisory
Committee, spoke in regard to the desire for health services that could be clearly
identified in Edina; however, there has been nothing but satisfaction with the
services provided by Bloomington. She felt it appropriate that the Committee
recommend Bloomington's proposal, not only because of the lower cost but also
because of the-qualifications of the personnel in their agency and the nature of
the programs that are being provided. Member Kelly expressed her hope that Edina
appreciates all the wonderful people involved in the health care profession, and
she wanted to compliment them on the excellent work they have done. There being no
further discussion, Member Kelly's motion that the Community Health Services Contract
for 1986 -1987 be awarded to the Bloomington Division of Public Health was seconded
by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
EDINA REGULATIONS GOVERNING GARAGE SALES, ESTATE SALES AND SUNDAY SALES DISCUSSED.
Mr. Rosland explained that the key questions concerning this issue were the
restriction of merchandise from outside the home and Sunday sales of property.
The Garage Sale Ordinance states that the items offered for sale must be owned
by the owner of the premises or by friends of the owner of the premises and shall
not have been bought for resale or received on consignment for the purpose of resale.
The Ordinance permits one sale of products per year on residentially -zoned property,
and the maximum duration of a sale is 72 hours, or three days. Mr. Rosland
indicated that the law states that-an Edina resident cannot in theory sell anything
9/16/85
on Sunday; with all the activity going on every Sunday, this statute is obviously
in need of revision. Member Kelly asked if a neighborhood operation is different
than a commercially -zoned operation; Mr. Erickson pointed out that the Ordinance
does allow 72 consecutive hours for sales in residential areas which more than
likely would occur on the days Friday through Sunday. Mr. Erickson also indicated
that an ordinance that would indicate selling of property on Sunday in residential
areas to be illegal would be enforceable. Member Bredesen questioned if this also
encompassed the selling of a home on Sunday, or more specifically an open house.
Mr. Erickson expected that this point would be included in the ordinance's restriction.
Mr. Rosland explained that staff is now attempting to work out a centerfold for the
Edina Sun - Current with "neighborly" reminders of the ordinances in this city.
Member Turner would support this approach in reminding citizens of all kinds of
activities, but she sees no distinction between an estate sale and a large party
with regard to the activity that is generated in the residential neighborhood.
Therefore, she sees trying to enforce these types of Sunday activities as discrimina-
tory and impossible. Mr. Rosland's plan to pursue the centerfold concept in the
Sun - Current was unanimously supported. There was no further discussion.
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. Mr. Rosland reported that City staff
has received a favorable preliminary review by MNDOT on the proposed reconstruction
of Braemar Boulevard adjacent to the new Executive Nine Course. The review by
MNDOT was favorable with the additional funding allowance of an eight -foot bituminous
path adjacent to the reconstructed roadway. The project is to be tied to the golf
course construction project with just one prime contractor in charge of all work,'
which allows for the use and re -use of the soils as necessary on the two projects.'
The roadway will be raised slightly to remain above the one hundred year flood
elevation of the ponds.being developed on the new course. The estimated cost for
the golf course work is approximately $235,000.00, and the roadwork is $459,000.00;
significant costs can be funded under the state -aid roadway project. As recom-
mended by Mr. Rosland, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -268
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina,.Minnesota, that it has considered
the feasibility of the following proposed improvement:
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -268
Braemar Boulevard from Gleason Road to 1890' West
S.A.P. 120 - 138 -04
and does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement,
including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the
acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of
such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred
to in all subsequent proceedings as STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -268; the cost of
which shall be paid from municipal state -aid funds.
The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun - Current and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY. OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Hennepin County, Minnesota
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
GRADING, GRAVELING, BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING
WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -268
S.A.P. - 120 - 138 -04
GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION, GRADING, FILLING, DREDGING
AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT
IMPROVEMENT 85 -11A
CONTRACT 485 -11 (ENG)
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall,
4801 W. 50th Street at 11:00 A. M., Thursday, October 3, 1985. The Edina City
Council will meet at 7:00 P. M., Monday, October 7, 1985, to consider said bids.
The following are approximately major quantities:
55,400 C/Y Excavation
42,700 C/Y Common Borrow
7,772 Tons Cl. 2 Gravel
19,000 C/Y Dredging
1,434 L/F 12, 15, 18" &.38 X 57 Storm Sewer Pipe
2,361 Tons, Bituminous
44,250 S/Y Geotextile Fabric
22 Acres Seed, Sod & Planting
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid. Bids shall be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
9/16/85
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving
them may be returned unopened. Work must be done as described in plans and
specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications
are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check). Said deposit to be returned
upon return of the plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will
be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable
to the City Clerk in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of base
bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids. All plans
mailed must have enclosed a separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina
for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON WEST 44TH STREET AND WOODCREST DRIVE.
Mr. Rosland reported that sidewalk replacement along West 44th Street between
Browndale and France Avenue and along Woodcrest Drive.south of West 56th Street
has been investigated, and it has been determined that it is feasible and its
construction would be in the best interest of the City of Edina. Mr. Rosland
suggested that a hearing date be set for October 7, 1985. Member Richards offered
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT P -S -35
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed improvement described in the form of Notice of
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, October 7, 1985, at 7:00 P. M. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvement.
3. The City Clerk is.hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the,official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less
than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected
properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -35
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, October 7, 1985,
at 7:00 P. M., to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed
under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate
cost of said improvement is estimated by the City as set forth below:
West 44th Street between Browndale and France .
Avenue; Woodcrest Drive south of West 56th St.
ESTIMATED COST
Sidewalk'Replacement $14,032.90
Improvement No. P -S -35
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
VIEW OBSTRUCTION ON ACCESS ROADS DISCUSSED. Member Kelly indicated her concern that
hedges are obstructing the view on numerous access roads. Mr. Rosland explained
that there is a "Clear View" Ordinance, and he remarked that there is also a big
problem in just backing out of driveways in many cases. The Police look at these
situations and turn in recommendations; the Park Department is asked to make the
necessary trim - backs. The homeowner is also asked to voluntarily keep these hedges
9/16/85
trimmed for better safety. Police Chief Swanson ensured the Council that they
always respond to calls received regarding this matter. There were no further
comments.
INTERVIEWING PROCESS FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported
that on September 17, 1985, at 6:30 P. M., there will be interviews for the
remaining appointments for Boards and Commissions.
AMM OUTREACH MEETING ANNOUNCED. Member Turner reported that on October 1, 1985,
at 7:30 A. M., there will be an AMM Outreach Meeting, which is an opportunity for
Mayors, Council Members and City Managers to come and ask members of the Board
and staff of AMM any questions they have or to raise issues they feel AMM ought
to address. This is the last of a whole series of meetings around the metro area.
This particular meeting will be held at JP's Coffee Shop at Jerry's Super Valu
at 5125 Vernon Avenue in Edina.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF HOUSE FILE 1273 /SENATE FILE 1292. Mr.
Rosland reminded the Council of the resolution adopted at.the April 1, 1985,
meeting which supported the passage of House File 1273 /Senate File 1292. The
purpose of the bill was to modify Edina's special law pertaining to the Edina
Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association, which was being amended in order to
avoid the possibility of unintentionally reducing service benefits payable to
survivors of young firefighters with less than five to seven years of service.
During this last legislative session, that bill passed, and now in order to comply
with Minnesota Statutes 645.02 and 645.021, the Council must pass another resol-
ution approving the enactment of this law before it becomes effective. There being
no further discussion, Member Kelly offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PASSAGE OF
HOUSE FILE 1273 /SENATE FILE 1292
WHEREAS, the Edina Volunteer..Firefighters Relief Association was established to
provide benefits for Edina's Volunteer Firefighters; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Association has been governed under a special law, Laws of
Minnesota (1965) Chapter 592, as .amended by Chapter 644 (1969), and Chapter
229 (1975); and
WHEREAS, the 1979 State Legislature passed the Codified Chapter 424A of Minnesota
Statutes to standardize governance and eliminate special laws governing these
individual associations, repealing the section of Edina's special law relating to
pension benefits; and
WHEREAS, House File 729 addresses the special Edina law relating to survivor benefits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT. RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina approves
the enactment of the amendment to House File 729 which addresses the survivors'
benefits for the Edina Volunteer Firefighters Relief Association.
Motion for adoption of this resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING 1986 /1987 COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES PLAN. Mr. Rosland
explained that the 1986 -87 Community Health Services Plan reviewed by the Edina
Community Health Services Advisory Committee serves the purpose of directing City
funds toward specific ,programs and services which are designed to improve the
health status of Edina residents, prevent unnecessary institutionalization of the
ill or elderly and promote life styles and behaviors which will aid individuals in
living a healthful life. Member Turner questioned whether.the process is re-
sponsive enough to the City's particular needs, and Mr. Velde, City Sanitarian,
assured her that it was. There being no further discussion, Member Kelly offered
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH
SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION
. FOR THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of
the City of Edina and functions as the official Board of Health in the City of
Edina; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support and maintain the health
of the entire community at the highest level; and
WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of
public health services on the local level throughout the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public meeting held
relative to the needs and priorities of the community for Community Health Services;
and
9/16/85
WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Edina has reviewed the plan
for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina and recommends
its approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this self -same plan and finds it consistent
with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory
Board of Health and as expressed by the citizens of Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the
Community Health Services Plan for the City of Edina is approved and authorization
is hereby given to submit an application for the Community Health Services Act
subsidy.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be submitted to Hennepin County after
September 26, 1985, and that the record remain open for all written comments and
recommendations until September 26, 1985.
Motion for adoption.of this resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1232 -A2 ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. Mr. Rosland explained that
the City has issued parking permits to persons employed at 50th and France since
the parking ramps were constructed in 1975. Permit holders are allowed to park
without regard to the hourly limits imposed within the ramps. Permits cost
$15.00 annually and are issued only to those employed at Edina businesses at
50th and France. Pursuant to City Ordinance No. 1232, we were originally limited
to a maximum of 400 permits per year. In 1980,.the Council amended the ordinance
to increase the number of permits to 500. On August 6, 1985, the 50th and France
Business and Professional Association requested an increase from 500 to 600.
Based on a survey conducted by Mr. Hughes, Assistant City Manager, to determine
the number of stickered vehicles parked at a given time, Mr. Rosland recommended
that the number of permits be increased from 500 to 525 and the occupancy of the
ramps be evaluated during the next several months to determine if the ordinance
should be modified further prior to the sale of permits next April. Member Turner
questioned the increase to only 525 rather than 600; Mr. Hughes explained that
approving 100 additional permits would put the ramp at capacity. Member Bredesen
questioned whether new stickers could be reissued; Mr. Hughes indicated that this
is done and that if an employee cancels then a new sticker is issued to a new
employee. Mr. Hughes noted that there is a new color for the stickers each year.
Member Kelly questioned raising the parking fee to better cover the maintenance of
the ramps, and this raised fee might reduce the demand. Mr. Hughes explained that
if there isn't enough space in the ramps then employees park in the neighborhood.
Member Richards suggested increasing the number of permits from 500 to 600 and
leaving the fee at $15; in doing so, this would reserve the right to revoke those
over 500 if so deemed necessary. With no further discussion, Member Richards
introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption, with waiver of Second
Reading:
ORDINANCE N0: 1232 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1232
PERMITTING ISSUANCE OF 600
50TH AND FRANCE PARKING RAMP PERMITS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1232 is hereby amended to change the
number of permits allowed to be issued for the 50th.and France Parking Ramp Permits
from 500 to 600.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly,
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
Acting City Clerk
Richards, Turner, Courtney
Mayor
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment of
the following claims dated 9/16/85: General Fund, $51,072.19; Art Center, $127,85;
Swimming Pool Fund, $90.09;. Golf Course Fund, $9,521.80; Recreation Center Fund,
$921.38; Utility Fund, $376,514.59; Liquor Dispensary Fund, $77,702.84; Construction
Fund, $347,925.67; Total, $863,976.41; and for confirmation of the following claims
9/16/85
dated 8/31/85: General Fund, $156,165.74; Park Fund, $28.58; Art. Center, $702.36;
Swimming Pool Fund, $2,848.73; Golf Course Fund, $14,529.19; Recreation Center
Fund, $6,765.12; Gun Range Fund, $154.31;.Utility Fund, $38,598.79; Liquor
Dispensary Fund, $258,738.56; Construction Fund, $39,703.97; Total, $518,235.35.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards,.Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There.being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:55 P. M.
Acting City Clerk
MINUTES OF SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 16, 1985
5:00 P.M.
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
Member Richards entered the meeting at 5:20 p.m.
Pursuant to due notice, the Council met in the Manager's Conference Room of Edina
City Hall to review and consider the proposed 1986 Budget for the City of Edina.
City Manager Rosland explained that the proposed 1986 Budget.shows a substantial
increase over the 1985 Budget of 14.32 %. The total is $14,627,584 and of this
amount $3,665,000 is included in the City's Capital Improvement Plan. The proposed
1986 operating budget is $10,963,584; of this $7,862,836 is funded by the tax levy
and the balance is funded by various revenues. The proposed 1986 mill rate is
11.947. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the areas that significantly increased the
budget request are: insurance, elections, prosecutions, police and fire Medicare,
subsidy operating funds and two additional paramedics. These items total $702,000
which comprises 51.2% of the proposed increase and represent new policy decisions
or items that cannot be-readily controlled such as the insurance market. The rest
Of the budget request is $671,215 or 48.8% of the increase and these items are
more discretionary in nature and thus are open for some debate. A 5% increase in
salaries is recommended together with an increase of $100,000 in all commodities.
Assessor Ralph Johnson presented graphics showing the effect of the proposed budget
on an average homeowner and also on commercial and industrial property.
The Council then reviewed the proposed 1986 Budget request for Central Services
for City Hall, Public Works and Equipment. Also reviewed were Revenues and
Expenditures by fund and function.
The Council Members agreed to continue the 1986 budget hearing on Tuesday,
September 17, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 6:35 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES OF SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 17, 1985
7:00 P.M.
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
Mr. Rosland announced that various groups would be making presentations to the
Council in support of specific 1986 Budget requests. The following persons gave
presentations: Adele Dahl and Benjamin Withhart for Suburban Community Services;
Donna Skagerberg for the Edina Art Center; Geoff Workinger for the Human Relations
Commission, together with Steve Lepinski for Storefront /Youth Action; Ed Howat
and John Morten for the Edina Hockey Association; and Marsh Hallberg as Prosecuting
Attorney.
The Council then reviewed the proposed 1986 Budget expenditures for general
government areas of Public Works (administration, engineering and supervision),
Street Maintenance, Street Lighting, Street Name Signs, Traffic Control, Bridges,
Storm Drainage, City Properties, Sidewalks- Ramps- Parking Lots and Capital Outlay.
Next examined were proposed expenditures for Police Protection, Fire Protection,
Civilian Defense and Animal Control.
The 1986 budget hearing was continued to September 23, 1985 at 7:00 p.m. The
Mayor adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES OF SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 23, 1985
7:00 P. M.
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.:
RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN - EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT), SERIES 1985.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BONDS (FHA INSURED MORTGAGE LOAN -
EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT), SERIES 1985, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT FINANCING FOR A
MULTIFAMILY RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT WITH PARKING AND
RELATED FACILITIES UNDER THE MUNICIPAL HOUSING ACT, AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, by resolution adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
(the City), on June 17, 1985, after conducting a public hearing thereon, the -City
Council adopted a housing program and gave preliminary approval -to the issuance
of revenue bonds pursuant to the Act to finance.the acquisition and construction
of a multifamily rental housing development containing approximately 203 units,
together with parking and other functionally related and subordinate facilities,
to be located in the City at 7800 York Avenue (the Project); and
WHEREAS, Edina Park Plaza Associates, an Illinois limited partnership (the
Developer), whose general partner is Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an
Illinois corporation (the General Partner) has proposed that the City issue its
Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza
Project), in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $18,500,000 (the Bonds),
pursuant to the Act and lend the proceeds to the Developer for the financing of
the Project, for the purposes of providing housing in accordance with the Program
therefor, adopted by the City, as such program may from time to time be amended in
accordance with Chapter 462C of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the Authority) have entered into discussions with the East Edina Foundation (the
Foundation), The Edina Partnership, the Developer and others, and propose that
the Authority enter into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevel-
opment with the Foundation and that the Foundation enter into a Land Sale Agree-
ment and Contract for Private Redevelopment with The Edina Partnership (collectively,
the Redevelopment Contracts), which provide for, among other things, the conveyance
of certain land within the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project Area to the
Developer; and
WHEREAS, by the provisions of Chapter 462C of the Act, the City is authorized to
plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations and to make or
purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments as defined
in Chapter 462C of the Act, within the boundaries of the City, which revenue
bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the Program or
development; pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 462C, the City Council adopted
a Housing Plan on April 19, 1982, after a public hearing held thereon, which
Housing Plan was reviewed and commented upon by the Metropolitan Council pursuant
to paragraph (c) of Section 462C.01 of the Act; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds will be issued and sold pursuant to the Act and upon the terms
and conditions set forth in a Trust Indenture, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the
Indenture), to be entered into between the City and First National Bank of
Minneapolis (the Trustee); and
WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Bonds will be disbursed to the Developer for the
construction of the Project in the manner provided in the Indenture and a Financing
Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the Financing Agreement), to be entered
into between the City, the Developer, the General Partner and the Trustee; pursuant
to the Financing Agreement the City will provide the proceeds of the Bonds to make
a ,ton- recourse mortgage loan to the Developer which will be insured by the Federal.
Housing Administration (FHA) under Section 221(d)(4) of Title II of the National
Housing Act of 1934, as amended (the Mortgage Loan) and a supplemental loan which
will be secured initially by Bond proceeds and, once disbursed, by one or more
letters of credit in the form and amount, and issued by a financial.institution, as
specified in the Indenture and Financing Agreement (the Supplemental Loan) (the
Mortgage Loan and the Supplemental Loan are collectively referred to as the Loan);
and
WHEREAS, under the Indenture the City will grant a security interest in the City's
interest in the Loan and payments to be made thereunder-(except the City's right to
payment of expenses and indemnification), including the security therefor, as
J
9/23/85
security for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the
Bonds; and
WHEREAS, to secure the Developer's obligations under the Mortgage Loan the Developer
will deliver to the Trustee, as mortgagee under the Mortgage Loan, a mortgage
(the Mortgage), in form and substance to be eligible for mortgage insurance
provided by FHA; and
WHEREAS, the Developer will also enter into a Building Loan Agreement with the
Trustee and a Regulatory Agreement with the United States Department of Housing
and Urban Development; and
WHEREAS, the Loan will be serviced on behalf of the Trustee pursuant to a
Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 1985 (the Servicing Agreement) between
the Trustee and a servicer to be designated therein; and
WHEREAS, the Project will be subject to the terms and restrictions contained in
the Deed and Covenants Running with the Land, dated as of October 1, 1985 (the
Deed) executed by the party conveying to Project site, and accepted by the
Developer; and
WHEREAS, the Bonds are to be offered and sold pursuant to an Official Statement
(the Official Statement), which Official Statement will be in substantially the
form of the Preliminary Official Statement (the Preliminary Official Statement); and
WHEREAS, the following documents (collectively, the Documents; documents (a)
through (c) are herein referred to as the City's Financing Documents) relating
to the financing of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds have been submitted
to the City and are on file in the office of the City Clerk:
(a) the Indenture;
(b) the Financing Agreement, which includes a form of the Supplemental Loan
Note and the forms of letters of credit;
(c) the form of Bond Purchase Agreement (the Bond Purchase Agreement) between
the City and Dain Bosworth Incorporated and Dougherty, Dawkins, Strand &
Yost Incorporated (the Underwriters), for the purchase of the Bonds;
(d) the Deed;
(e) the Servicing Agreement;
.(f) a form of Rider to Mortgage Note to be executed by the Developer;
(g) the standard form of FHA Mortgage Note and Mortgage; and
(h) a draft Preliminary Official Statement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA:
1. It is hereby found, determined and declared:
(a) Pursuant to the Act, the City is authorized to plan, administer and
make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more multifamily housing
developments (as defined in Chapter 462C of the Act) and within the boundaries
of the City of the kind and upon the conditions set forth in Section 462C.05
of Chapter 462C of the Act and to issue and sell revenue bonds to finance
such multifamily housing developments, which revenue bonds shall be payable
exclusively from the revenues of the related programs and developments. The
Project will constitute a multifamily development under Section 462C.02, Subd. 5
of Chapter 462C of the Act. The program for the Project, as adopted on
June 17, 1985, has been submitted to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency in
accordance with Section 462C.05 of the Act for approval as provided in
Section 462C.01 on the basis of considerations stated in Section 462C.04 of the
'Act, and. is deemed approved under the provisions of said Section 462C.04,
Subdivision 1.
(b) The City is authorized to develop and to finance such program by
the authorization, issuance and sale of revenue bonds or obligations payable
solely from the revenues of such program and the Project. The purpose of the
Project is and its effect will be to promote the public welfare and preserve
the quality of life in the City by helping to maintian, provide and preserve
adequate housing stock within the City and to assist persons of low and moderate
income, or elderly persons, or both, to obtain decent, safe and sanitary housing
within the City.
(c) Based upon representations by the Developer, financing for the
Project is not otherwise available to the Developer from private lenders upon
terms and conditions which are affordable by the Developer, such financing
being available only at a rate which, when combined with the cost of acquisition,
construction and other costs incidental to the construction of the Project as
well as noneconomic factors, would impair the feasibility of the Project, the
Developer anticipates that revenue to be produced by the rental of unites in
the Project will be sufficient to meet payments when due on the Loan.
(d) It is desirable that the City issue the Bonds in an aggregate
principal amount not to exceed $18,000,000 upon the terms set forth herein and
in the Indenture.
9/23/85
2. The forms of the Indenture and Financing Agreement on file with
the City Clerk are hereby ;approved. The Mayor of the City, and the City
Manager, are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute
the Indenture and the Financing Agreement in_ substantially the form hereby
approved, but including such modifications, insertions and additions as are
necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City
Attorney, and in conformity with paragraph 3 of this resolution and consistent
with the Act. Copies of the Documents, when executed, shall be delivered,
filed and recorded as provided therein. The execution of any of the City's
Financing Documents by the appropriate officers of the City shall be
conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City.
3. The execution, delivery and closing of the Redevelopment Contracts
according to their terms shall be a condition precedent to the issuance of
the Bonds, _unless waived in writing by the Mayor and City Manager of the
City. Subject to such condition, the Bonds are hereby authorized to be
issued in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $18,000,000 pursuant
to and in accordance with, and subject to the terms, conditions and limitations
established in, the Indenture. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered
form without coupons.
The Bonds shall mature not later than October 1, 2028. The Current
Interest Bonds (as defined in the Indenture) will be dated as of October 1, 1985,
and will bear interest from their issue date payable semiannually on each
April 1 and October 1 in each year, commencing April 1, 1986, at a rate or rates
not in excess of 10.50% per annum, and the Capital Appreciation Bonds (as
defined in the Indenture) will bear interest from the date of their issuance
and delivery, compounded on April 1, 1986 and semiannually thereafter on each
October 1 and April 1 so as to produce a yeild to maturity not in excess of
11.50% and is payable, together with principal, only at maturity or upon
redemption; and provided that the Annual Debt Service due in any Bond Year
with respect to the Bonds will not exceed $2,000,000. A "Bond Year" shall be
from October 2 of each calendar year to and including October 1 of the next
succeeding calendar year except that the first Bond Year shall be from the
date of initial issuance and delivery of the Bonds to and including October 1,
1986. "Annual Debt Service" shall mean the amount of principal and interest
or Accreted Amount (as defined in the Indenture) scheduled to be due and
payable in any Bond Year, excluding any amounts of principal or Accreted Amount
attributable to scheduled reductions in the Debt Service Reserve Fund.
Subject to the limitations set forth in this paragraph 3, authority is
hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly,
to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds to be issued, the maturities
thereof, and the rate or rates of interest payable on the Bonds.
With respect to any Bonds which shall be redeemed, in part, by application
of Sinking Fund Payments (as defined in the Indenture) as provided in the
Indenture, subject to the limitations set forth in this Section, the Mayor and
the City Manager of the City, acting jointly , are hereby delegated the
authority to fix and determine the schedule of Sinking Fund Payments to be
applied to the mandatory redemption of such Bonds. Such Bonds shall be redeemed
by the City in accordance with such schedule at a Redemption Price equal to the
principal amount, or Accreted Amount in the case of capital appreciation
bonds, of each Bond to be redeemed, without premium. Notice of such redemption
shall be given as prescribed in the Indenture.
Bonds maturing not earlier than the tenth Bond Year nor later than the
twentieth Bond Year, are subject to mandatory redemption from Voluntary Prepay-
ments (as defined in the Indenture), and optional redemption at the option of
the City from any source, in whole or in part, on any April 1 or October 1, on
or after the first optional redemption date described above, at a redemption
price equal to their principal amount plus accrued interest, or Accreted
Amount, as applicable, plus a premium for redemption not to exceed 105% of
the principal amount or Accreted Amount of each Bond or portion thereof then
redeemed. Subject to the execution, delivery and closings of the
Redevelopment Contracts, the City shall proceed forthwith to issue its Bonds,
in the form and upon the terms set forth in the Indenture, with the interest
rates, maturities, redemption premiums and in the principal amount established
as provided in this paragraph 3.
4. The form of Bond Purchase Agreement presented to this meeting is
hereby approved, subject to such changes as may be deemed desirable by the
Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Bond Purchase Agreement in
substantially the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement presented to this meeting,
together with such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the
Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, subject to the limitations
contained in this Resolution, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive
evidence of the approval of such changes and completions.
9/23/85
5. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and City Manager of the
City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds,
provided that the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds shall not be less
ninety -seven percent (97 %) of the principal amount thereof to be issued plus
accrued interest thereon from their issue date to the date of delivery thereof
and payment therefor.
6. To evidence the exercise of the authority delegated to the Mayor
and City Manager of the City by this Resolution, the Mayor and City Manager
are hereby directed to execute and file with the Trustee a certificate setting
forth the determinations made by them pursuant to the authority granted in
this Resolution, which certificate shall constitute conclusive evidence of the
proper exercise by them of such authority.
7. The distribution of a Preliminary Official Statement with respect
to the Bonds in substantially the form presented to this meeting to pro-
spective purchasers and the use thereof by the Underwriters in connection with
the offering of the Bonds is hereby authorized and approved. The Mayor is
hereby authorized to permit the distribution of the final Official Statement,
in substantially the form of said Preliminary Official Statement, with such
changes, omissions, insertions and revisions as the Mayor, the City Manager
and the City Attorney shall deem advisable.
8. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized and directed to prepare
and execute the Bonds and to deliver them to the Trustee for authentication
and delivery to the purchasers thereof, together with a certified copy of this
Resolution and other documents required by the Indenture. As provided in the
Indenture, the Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures
of the City or a facsimile thereof and shall be authenticated by the Trustee,
as authenticating agent, pursuant to Section 475.55, Subdivision 1, Minnesota
Statutes.
9. As provided in the Indenture, the Bonds are special, limited
obligations of the City. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the
Bonds are payable soley out of the revenues derived from the sources described
in the Granting Clauses of the Indenture. The State of Minnesota and the
County of Hennepin shall not in any event be liable for the payment of the
principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds or for the performance
of any pledge, mortgage, obligation or agreement of any kind whatsoever that
may be undertaken by the City. Neither the Bonds nor any of the agreements
or obligations of the City contained in the Indenture or in the Financing
Agreement shall be construed to constitute an indebtedness of the State of
Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City, within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory provisions whatsoever, nor to constitute or give
rise to a pencuniary liability or be a charge against the general credit or
taxing power of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City.
10. The Mayor, the City Manager and the City. Clerk of the City are
authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the
Underwriters certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City
relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be
required to show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such
facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control
or as otherwise known to them; and all such certified copies, certificates
and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute
representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein.
11. Approval hereby given to the various documents referred to above
includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and
appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and approved by
the City Attorney and the Mayor and the City Manager authorized herein to execute
said documents prior to their execution; and the Mayor and the City Manager
are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The
execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City
herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents
in accordance with the terms hereof, In the absence of the Mayor or the City
Manager, the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be
executed by the Acting Mayor or the Assistant City Manager.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina this 23rd
day of September, 1985.
Attest:
City Manager
Mayor
9/23/85
BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT WEST 70TH STREET & CORNELIA. Mr. Rosland pre-
sented a quote for a traffic signal cabinet complete with eight -phase controller,
MNDOT (Contract 7905014849 -01; S.A.P. 120 - 145 -15) to be located at West 70th
Street and Cornelia. The only bid was from the State supplier, Riddle Control
Products, for an amount of $7,868.00. Member Kelly's motion was seconded by
Member Richards for award of bid to Riddle Control Products at $7,868.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON HOMART. Member Richards reported on the latest meeting between
the City Councils of Edina and Bloomington concerning the Homart Project. Edina
will take the necessary action to protect its interest unless Bloomington could
act within the time frame set forth by Edina. The possibility of reducing and
limiting densities was discussed, predicated upon getting approvals on upgrading
public improvements. The density is three times greater than what Edina would
approve, and the concept of six lanes on France Avenue must be approved by the City.
The impact on 494 should be given careful consideration. Member Richards
recommended starting the lawsuit as soon as possible to protect the interests of
the City of Edina. Mr. Rosland said it would be commenced imtediately..
COUNCIL`CONTINUES REVIEW-OF PROPOSED 1986 BUDGET. Mr. Rosland recalled that
the Council had begun the review of the proposed 1986 Budget at special meetings
on October 16 and 17, 1985. The Council then reviewed proposed expenditures
for Park & Recreation (Administration, Recreation, Maintenance, Capital Outlay
and Capital Improvements).
Next examined were proposed Non - Departmental Expenditures (.Contingencies, Special
Assessments on City Property, Central Services - Capital Outlay, Capital Improve-
ments and Commissions and Special Projects).' Mr. Hughes reported that the Edina
Recycling Commission has proposed a budget of $13,450 to fund a household pickup
program of recyclables. Mr. Rosland then presented the request for funding from
The Women's Resource Center in the amount of $1,500 for general program operating
expenses or to be applied to any particular program. Mr. Rosland next addressed the
relocation of the Historical Society and related costs. A relocation study is
proposed to be funded one -half by the City, with the other half being shared by
The Foundation and the Edina Historical Society. The Council discussed the Loss
Subsidy Operating Funds (Swimming Pool, Recreation Center, Gun Range and Art
Center) and Income Producing Funds.
The Council then discussed the major factors contributing to the increase in
recommended expenditures for 1986. The proposed Capital Plan Revenues and Ex-
penditures were reviewed. Following completion of the proposed 1986 budget
review, the Council discussed budget adjustments concerning the following areas:
insurance, staff, SFYA, prosecution, Community Service Officers, and contingencies.
The 1986 budget hearing was continued to September 25, 1985, at 8:00 A. M.
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:00 P. M.
Acting City Clerk
MINTUES OF SPECIAL BUDGET MEETING
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 25, 1985
8:00 A. M.
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
1986 BUDGET OF $14,274,714 ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland presented the Budget adjust-
ments that the Council had discussed at their September 23, 1985.meeting. 'After
considerable discussion on the proposed reductions, Member Kelly moved that the
proposed Budget for 1986 for the City of Edina be reduced by $3.52,870. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
Of the $14,274,714 proposed for the 1986 Budget, $10,609.714 represents the
Operating Budget, and the remaining $3,665,000 is the Capital Plan. Member
Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1986, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1985 PAYABLE IN 1986
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1986 is
hereby adopted as hereinafter set forth; and funds are hereby appropriated
therefor:
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council $ 42,220
Planning 136,448
Administration 358,882
Finance 216,414
Election 75,603
Assessing 246,084
Legal and Court Services 265,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration $ 89,874
Engineering 350,961
Highways 2,479,656
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY.
Police
Fire
Civilian Defense
Animal Control
Public Health
Inspection
TOTAL PROTECTION OF
PERSONS AND PROPERTY
PARK DEPARTMENT
Administration
Recreation
Maintenance
Capital Outlay and Replacements
TOTAL PARK FUND
NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
Contingencies
Special Assessments on City Property
Unallocated Capital Outlay
Capital Improvements
Commissions and Special Projects,
Park Construction
TOTAL NON- DEPARTMENTAL
EXPENDITURES
$2,591,698
1,608,133
43,043
49,206
220,554
169.,073
$ 414,838
102,375
550,530
120,000
$ 80,000
75,000
35,000
40,000
169,122
80,000
$1,340,651
2,920,491
4,681,707
1,187,743
479,122
TOTAL GENERAL FUND $10,609,714
9/25/85
Section 2. Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby estab-
lished as hereinafter set forth:
GENERAL FUND
Transfer - Revenue Sharing Fund
Licenses and Permits
Municipal Court Fines
Department Service Charges
Other
Transfer from Liquor Fund
State Apportionments - Sales Tax
Income on Investments
Aids - Other Agencies
Police Aid
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS
Section 3. That there be and hereby is levied upon all
taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina,
a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter
set forth:
For General Fund
$ 225,000
478,700
360,000
608,800
100,900
450,000
550,444
70,000
175,665
150,000
$3,169,509
$7,440,205
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
ATTEST:
Acting City Clerk
Mayor
Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
Managerial $6.45
RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION -RATES
BE IT RESOLVED
that the Edina City Council
does hereby establish the
following
salary schedule
for fulltime
personnel for
1986:
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Management III
$43,472
$47,268
$51,090
$54,340
Management II
32,500
35,334
38,168
40,586
Management I
27,352
29,770
32,162
34,216
Technical Management
24,960
27,144
29,328
31,200
Technical IV
22,048
23,998
25,896
27,586
Technical III
19,994
21,736
24,478
24,986
Technical II
19,604
21,294
23,010
24,492
Technical I
17,524
19,084
20,618
21,918
General III
16,406
17,836
19,266
20,514
General II
15,236
16,536
17,888
19,032
General I
13,546
14,716
15,912
16,926
Public Safety.
PS Management
III
36,868
40,092
43,316
46,072
PS Management
II
34,476
37,518
40,508
43,108
PS Management
I
31,356
34,086
36,868
39,208
PS General II
19,162
20,852
.22,516
23,972
PS General I
15,236
16,536
17,888
19,032
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that
the City of Edina
does
hereby establish
the following
compensation schedule
for part
-time personnel:
Year Round
Level
A
Level B
Step 1
$4.20
$4.60
Step 2
4.55
5.10
Step 3
4.75
5.45
Step 4
5.05
5.60
Step 5
5.40
5.70
Managerial $6.45
I
9/25/85
Seasonal
Level 1 $3.50
3.75
3.90
Level 2 3.65
-3.95
4.15
Level 3 4.10
4.40
4.55
Level 4 4.40
4.65
4.80
Level 5 4.55 - 5.80
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
.Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A21 (FEES & CHARGES) ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. As recom-
mended by Staff, Member Bredesen offered Ordinance No. 171 -A21 for First Reading,
waiving Second Reading as follows
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A21
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE THE AMOUNTS OF CERTAIN FEES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee•Numbers of Schedule A to
Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
434 27(f) Public or semi - public swimming pool $210.00 per annum for each 17a
license pool enclosed part or all
Sec. 2. Following publication, the effective date of this ordinance shall be
January 1, 1986.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
Acting City Clerk
Mayor
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FEES FOR 1986 APPROVED. Member Kelly introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION SETTING PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1986
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following "Fees and Charges for
the Year 1986, as submitted by the Edina Park Board, be approved:
Park and Recreation
Playground $ 6.00 Tennis Instruction $18.00
Dramatics & Theatre 18.00 Soccer 18.00
T -Ball 18.00
of year
$115.00 per annum for each
17b
outdoor pool
434 28(f) Public or semi - public whirlpool bath
$40.00 per annum for each
18
or therapeutic swimming pool license
bath or pool
731 Food establishment
$245.00 per annum, plus
25a
$70.00 per annum for each
additional facility
Take -out facility
$145.00 per annum
25a1
Packaged food sales
$90.00 per annum
25a2
- Food warehouse
$40.00 per annum
25a3
Itinerant food establishment
$35.00 per event
25b
Readily perishable food vehicle
$40.00 per annum
25d
Fleet of 5 or more readily
$200.00 per annum
25e
perishable food vehicles
Perishable food vehicle
$40.00 per annum
25h
Fleet of 5 or more perishable
$200.00 per annum
25i
food vehicles
Sec. 2. Following publication, the effective date of this ordinance shall be
January 1, 1986.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST:
Acting City Clerk
Mayor
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FEES FOR 1986 APPROVED. Member Kelly introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION SETTING PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
FEES AND CHARGES FOR 1986
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following "Fees and Charges for
the Year 1986, as submitted by the Edina Park Board, be approved:
Park and Recreation
Playground $ 6.00 Tennis Instruction $18.00
Dramatics & Theatre 18.00 Soccer 18.00
T -Ball 18.00
9/25/85
Art Center
Memberships:
course:
Class Fees:
Adult -
Family $
35.00
Adult Member
$48.00
Individual
25.00
Adult Non - Member
56.00
Contributing
50.00
Child Member
32.00
Sustaining
100.00
Child Non - Member
38.00
Patron
500.00
Arena
Single Hour Rate
$70.00
Contract Rate (10 or
more hours)
67.50
Late Night - midnight
or later
55.00
Open Skating
2.25
Skate Rental
1.06
Skate Sharpening
1.50
Season Tickets - Effective
10/1/85
Resident Family
$52.00
Resident Individual
32.00
Non - Resident Family
62.00
Non- Resident Individual
37.00
Classes
35.00
Gun Range
Pistol one -half hour
$ 3.75
25 Rounds trap
4.00
Building - per hour
40.00
Firearm Safety Instruction
5.00
Pool
Season Tickets:
Daily Admission:
Resident Family
$40.00
Adult
$ 2.50
Resident Individual
25.00
Youth
2.00
Non - Resident Family
45.00
Aquatic Instruction
$18.00
Non - Resident Indiv.
30.00
Braemar Golf Course
Patron Cards:
Husband & Wife $75.00
Addit.Family Member 35.00
Individual 40.00
Computerized Handic. $ 8.00
Lockers:
Men's 72" $30.00
Men's 42" 18.00
Ladies' 72" 10.00
Group Golf Lessons:
Adult
Junior
Golf Range:
Large Bucket
Small Bucket
Club Rental
Pull Carts
Golf Cars: Golf Car Senior:
18 Holes $16.00 18 Holes
9 Holes 8.50 9 Holes
Braemar Golf Course -Green Fees
18 Hole - non patron $11.50
18 Hole - patron 8.50
9 Hole - non patron 7.00
9 Hole - patron 5.50
Seniors:
18 Hole - non pat. $10.50
18 Hole - patron 7.50
9 Hole - non patron 6.50
9 Hole - patron
Braemar Ballfields:
General Park Areas:
Picnic Shelters:
Summer Rental Pavilion:
$40.00
22.00
$ 3.25
. 2.25
$ 4.50
$ 1.50
$13.00
7.00
Executive
course:
Adult -
non patron
$ 5..00
Adult -
patron
4.00
Sr.,Jr.
- non patron
4.00
Sr.,Jr.
- patron
3.00
Group Fees
14.00
Group Fees Cars
18.00
RENTALS
$30.00 /hr. - no lights
(only with rental of Pavilion)
$50.00 /hr. - with lights
(only with rental of Pavilion)
$50 /hr. - commercial use
(i.e. TV Commercials)
$30 up to 50 people - Lake Cornelia
Park (pool) & Braemar Area (Dome)
$60 over 50 people
$400 - 500 /day - large profit events
(dog shows, flea markets)
$250 /day - small events - non profit
(100 or less people)
Parking Lot Rental:
Arena $100 /day
Art Center $30 /group limited space
9/25/85
Showmobile: $500 /day
Rental of Athletic Field: $30 /day exclusive use
Portable Bleachers: $100 /day or $50.00 /hr.
plus Delivery Charge
Recreational Picnic Equipment: Free usage
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member`Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 A. M.
Acting City Clerk
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING
OCTOBER 7, 1985
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and
Courtney.
MINUTES of September 9, 1985 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner
Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BIDS - EDINBOROUGH UTILITIES ACTION MOVED TO COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM V.A.
Attorney Tom Erickson explained that a Joint Powers Agreement between the
H.R.A. and the City has been drafted so that the H.R.A. and the City can award
as one bid two separate items of work for the Edinborough utilities, one for
the H.R.A. public work and one for the City public work. He recommended that
agenda item I be moved down to the City Council agenda item V.A. for award of
bids and that a joint meeting be convened at that point. Motion of Commissioner
Bredesen was seconded by Commissioner Turner to take action on agenda item I
in a joint meeting with the Council when it considers agenda item V.A.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BILTMORE MOTEL REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL APPROVED; REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT AUTHORIZED.
Mr. Rosland recalled that the Council heard the Biltmore rezoning request on
August 19, 1985 and at that time the proponent of the project, Frank Dunbar,
also discussed a request for $1,000,000 of tax increment financing assistance
from the H.R.A. Although the City granted preliminary approval of the rezoning,
the members of the HRA /Council expressed reservations concerning the financial
assistance. Subsequently, staff and Mr. Dunbar have met on several occasions
to discuss revisions to the financing proposal. The restructuring of the proposal
requests that the City issue Housing Revenue Bonds to finance the project.
Mr. Dunbar recalled that on August 19, 1985 they had proposed a concept for
senior housing under a redevelopment proposal for the Biltmore Motel site. At
that time they presented an analysis of the market as well as a financial structure
to address that market. Since that time they have re- analyzed primarily the
financial structure still trying to maintain a very strong presence to the
market that could be penetrated with the project. It is still seen as a redevelop-
ment project to meet the goals and objectives of the redevelopment district.
Mr. Dunbar said they have held the program intact from the standpoint of pre-
sentation to the market after considerable discussion with Health Planning and
Management Resources, Inc. and Health Central Corporation. The acceptable market
is perceived as the senior citizen 55 years and older that is looking to give
up their single family home and moving to a facility such as is proposed. The
restructured financial proposal has been modified to a Housing Revenue Bond
which would allow the developer to take advantage of the tax - exempt status.
Mr. Dunbar explained that 1) they are not requesting the City to do a redevelop-
ment project in a manner dissimilar to what they have previously done, and
2) the tax increment that is generated from the redevelopment project would be
available to meet the goals and objectives.of the redevelopment district as a
whole. However, it is requested that off -site improvements that would be
proposed by the project and under the district objectives would be covered by
the bond. He pointed out that this type of financing does require that 20%
of the units be provided to low and moderate households. This would be moni-
tored on an annual basis to be sure that goal is met. Mr. Dunbar stated they
are requesting authorization by concept approval to proceed to a redevelopment
contract together with an inducement resolution for sale of the bonds. Both
0. R
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Two
actions would be subject to final review and approval by the Council. Commissioner
Turner questioned 1) why the market.is directed at age 55 and older when units
in the City's PSR zoning.is specifically designed for occupancy by persons
62 years of age or over, 2) why the increment district would pay for off -site
improvements instead of the project, 3) what the cost is-to the Federal and
State governments of this type of financing, and 4) whether approval of the
project must be given by the MHFA. Planner Larsen responded that there is a
precedent for the increment district paying for public improvements as was
done for the South Haven senior project. Mr. Dunbar said the age issue
could be worked out in the redevelopment contract and that regarding the cost
to Federal /State governments the interest earned on the bonds is not taxable
to the.lender. With respect to MHFA approval, Mr. Hughes said they could be
involved as to income limits on persons occupying the units, but that this
type of bond issue would not be subject to their ceiling. In response to Commiss-
ioner Bredesen, Mr. Dunbar said approximately'30 units would be provided for
low and moderate income occupancy. Commissioner Richards asked about timing
for the project. Mr. Dunbar indicated that the financing must be closed and
the redevelopment contract executed prior to the end of the year. He said
that no actual work can be started on the site until the financing is secured
so that the first lender can have a clear title, but that there is an incentive
to have the existing building down by January 2 from a tax standpoint. In
response to the question as to rentals, Mr. Dunbar said there would be a range
of approximately $850 for one bedroom units to $1,300 for three bedroom units,
including a minimum of one meal and certain other services. Rentals for low
and moderate income units would be determined on a case by case basis depending
on household income. Commissioner Bredesen commented that, concerning the issue
of redevelopment, this property is not in a distressed area and questioned
whether it is redevelopable without financial support.: Mr..Hughes responded. '
that in staff's opinion it is if the.objective is to develop it for housing
purposes. Commissioner Richards asked if the cost of staff time for the
project, over and above normal planning time, would be picked up by the project.
Mr. Dunbar responded that that issue could be addressed in the redevelopment
contract. Following further discussion, Commissioner Kelly moved concept approval
of the project and the-drafting of a redevelopment contract. -The motion -was-
seconded by Commissioner Turner, who commented that the public purpose of the
project was to provide housing for 30 low and moderate income elderly persons
and to widen the range of housing choices within the City as stated in the
Comprehensive. Plan. She asked that staff consider carefully the issue of the age
requirement and Edina preference in drafting the redevelopment contract. Mayor
Courtney then called the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Commissioner Richards suggested that the City Council be convened with the HRA at
this time to consider Council agenda item VIII.B. Chairman Courtney thereupon
convened a joint HRA /Council meeting.
CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS INDUCING RESOLUTION FOR HOUSING REVENUE BONDS /BILTMORE
SITE REDEVELOPMENT. Subject to the developer paying the cost of staff time
in connection with the sale of the Housing Revenue Bonds, Member Richards
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Three
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C, MINNESOTA STATUTES, FOR THE
PURPOSE OF FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT;
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND
CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ")
as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended
(the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue
bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily
housing developments within its boundaries which revenue bonds or obligations
shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development or other security
pledged therefor.
1.02. Representatives of Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota Limited
Partnership (the "Developer "), have advised this Council of its desire to acquire
land located within the geographical limits of the City at 5212 Vernon Avenue
and construct and equip thereon a multifamily rental apartment building containing
approximately 152 units, together with parking and related and subordinate
facilities (the "Development "). The Development is intended primarily for
occupancy by elderly persons. Total development and financing costs are pres-
ently estimated by the Developer to be approximately $13,840,000.
1.03. Representatives of the Developer have requested that the City issue
its revenue bonds in one or more series (the "Bonds ") pursuant to the authority
of the Act in such aggregate principal amount as may be necessary to finance
all or a portion of the costs of the Development and make the proceeds,,of the
Bonds available to the Developer, directly or indirectly, for the acquisition,
construction and equipping of the Development, subject to agreement by the
Developer to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
1.04. The City has been advised by representatives of the Developer that
conventional commercial financing is available to pay the capital costs of the
Development only on a limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that
the scope of the Development and the economic feasibility of operating the
Development would be significantly affected, but with the aid of municipal
financing the Development can-be constructed as designed and its operation can
be made more economically feasible.
1.05. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or
responsible for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
Section 2. Approvals and Authorization.
2.01. It is hereby found and determined that it would be in the best
interest of the City to issue the Bonds under the provisions of the Act in an
amount currently estimated to be approximately $13,840,000 to finance all or a
portion of the costs of the Development.
2.02. The Development is hereby given preliminary approval by the City and
the issuance of the Bonds for such purpose approved. The Bonds shall not be
issued until a multifamily housing program prepared pursuant to the requirements
of Subdivision 5 of Section 462C.05 of the Act for the Development and the
issuance of the Bonds (the "Program ") has been reviewed and approved as provided
by the Act, until the other requirements of the Act have been satisfied, until
the requirements of Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended
(the "Code "), necessary in order to assure the tax - exemption of the interest
hereon, have been satisfied, and until the City, the Developer and the purchaser
or purchasers of the Bonds have agreed upon the details of the Bonds and the
provisions for their payment. The principal of, premium, if any, and interest
on each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall be payable solely from the revenues
t w
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Four
and the other security or property pledged to the payment thereof and shall
not constitute an indebtedness of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional or statutory limitation.
2.03. The Developer has agreed to pay any and all costs incurred by the
City in connection with the Development whether or not the Program is prepared
or approved by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency; whether or not the
Development is carried to completion; and whether or not the Bonds are issued.
2.04. The City retains the right, in its sole discretion, to withdraw from
participation and, accordingly, not issue the Bonds should the City at any time
prior to the issuance thereof determine that it is in the best interest of the
City not to issue the Bonds.
2.05. This Resolution is intended to, and shall, constitute a "bond
resolution" or "some other official action" with respect to the Bonds and the
Development under, and within the meaning of, Section 1.103 -8(a) of the Treasury
Regulations under the Code.
Section 3. Public Hearing.
3.01. Section 462C.04, subdivision 2 of the Act requires that prior to
adoption of the Program under the Act, this Council conduct a public hearing
on the Program. Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
amended, and regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to this
issuance of the Bonds, this Council approve the Bonds and the Development,
after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the Program
and on the proposal to undertake and finance the Development through the
issuance of the bonds is hereby called and shall be held on November 4, 1985,
At 7 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall:
3.02. A draft of the Program is attached hereto as Exhibit A. On or
before the date on which the notice of public hearing is published in the
official newspaper of the City, the City Clerk shall submit the Program to the
Metropolitan Council for,review and comment.
3.03. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be
published in the Edina Sun Current, the official newspaper of the City, at
least once not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the date fixed for the
public hearing. The notice to be published shall be in substantially the
following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED PROGRAM FOR
THE FINANCING OF A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 462C, AS AMENDED AND
THE ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING REVENUE BONDS,
MINNESOTA STATUTES, CHAPTER 462C, AS AMENDED
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota (the City), will meet on November 4, 1985, at 7 o'clock P.M.,
at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose
of conducting a public hearing in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section
462C.04 and Section 103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended
(the Code) on the proposal that the City undertake a program under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended, and issue revenue bonds, in one or more
series, under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended, in order to finance
the cost of a multifamily housing program. The proposed program will consist
of the financing of the acquisition of land in the City and the constructing
and equipping thereon of a multifamily housing project consisting of one or
more buildings and containing approximately 152 residential units. The project
will be owned by Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota limited partner-
ship (the Borrower). The project will be located at 5212 Vernon Avenue in the
City. The maximum aggregate principal amount of the proposed bond issue is
$13,840,000. The bonds shall be limited obligations of the City, and the
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Five
bonds and interest thereon shall be payable solely from the revenue pledged
to the payment thereof, except that such bonds may be secured by a mortgage
and other encumbrance on the project. No holder of any such bonds shall ever
have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay
the bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property
of the City except moneys payable by the Borrower to the City and pledged
to the payment of the bonds.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set
forth above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the
date of the hearing set forth above.
Dated: October 7, 1985
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
/s Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
City of Edina, Minnesota
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA.STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C
1. Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota Limited Partnership (the
. "Developer ") intends to acquire land in the City.of Edina, Minnesota (the
"City ") and construct and equip thereon a multifamily residential rental
facility to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in part by persons
and families of low and moderate income. The site is located at 5212 Vernon
Avenue in the City. The development will contain approximately 152 housing
units, at least 20% of which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate
income," under §103(b)(4) (A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended
(the "Code "), and the Regulations thereunder.
2. Representatives of the Developer have requested that the City -issue
its housing revenue bonds under the Act in a maximum aggregate principal
amount of approximately $13,840,000 to finance the acquisition of the site
and the construction and equipping of the development and facilities function-
ally subordinate and related to the development.
3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for the City's goal of
providing a variety of housing stock throughout the City, for persons residing
in the City, including persons of low and moderate income. The development
to be financed by the Program will assist the City in certain problems addressed
in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available housing stock, (b)
providing decent, sanitary and affordable housing for residents of the City,
including persons of low and moderate income and their families.
4. The development will be a "multifamily housing development" within
the meaning of Subd. 5 of 0462C.02 of the Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd.4
of 9462C.05 of the Act. The income limitations set fourth in Subd. 2 of
8462C.05 of the Act will not apply to this development since it will be located
within a redevelopment project area under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.
In addition, as discussed in paragraph 1 of this Program, at least 20% of
the units will be rented or available for rental to persons of low and moderate
income; that is, with incomes not greater than 80% of the median family income
as estimated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
for the statistical area in which the City is located, currently $26,240.
5. To finance the development, the City intends to issue its housing
revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in a maximum aggregate principal amount of
approximately $13,840,000 (the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the
Bonds to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which the Developer
agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to repay the Bonds. The Bonds will
be a special, limited obligation of the City, payable solely from revenues
derived from payments to be made by the Developer under the revenue agreement
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Six
and pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured by a mortgage
and security interest in the development, or by some form of credit enhancement
(which may include one or more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage
loan or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota
this 7th day of October, 1985.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded
by Member Turner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted and was signed
by the Mayor whose signature was attested by the City Clerk.
BIDS AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH UTILITIES; JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT APPROVED.BY HRA
AND COUNCIL. Mr. Rosland presented the following tabulation of bids for con-
struction of the Edinborough project utilities:
Annandale Sewer & Water $331,284.17 Hayes Contractors, Inc. $365,201.73
Northdale Construction 332,225.77 Brown & Cris, Inc. 374,842.95
Orfei & Sons, Inc. 333,712.03 Richard Knutson, Inc. 376,488.25
Arcon Construction Co. 336,766.90 Hennen Construction Co. 384,388.40
Q.R.S. Corporation 339,926.00 Progressive Contractors 391,458.05
S.J. Louis Construction 350,496.15 Bergstrom Retail 400,261.50
L & G Rehbein, Inc. 352,532.00 Encon Utilities 409,901.30
Barbarossa & Sons; Inc. 357,777.61 Lametti & Sons, Inc. 634,349.70
G. L. Contracting, Inc. 362,513.28
Staff would recommend award of bid to low bidder, Annandale Sewer & Water, subject
to the closing on the property which is expected to be accomplished within the
next few weeks. Mr. Erickson explained that part of the utilities is HRA work
and part is City work and that they are physically connected and will be con-
structed essentially as one package with the costs being recorded separately
so that part of the cost will be assessed and part will be paid through tax
increment. In order to achieve this it is recommended that a Joint Powers
Agreement.be executed between the HRA and the Council in order to jointly and
cooperatively publish bids for, award contracts for, and do the public utility
work. Commissioner /Councilmember Bredesen then introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RFRnT.TTTTnN
BE IT RESOLVED by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota,
and the Edina City Council that they hereby authorize and direct the execution
of a Joint Powers Agreement between the HRA and the Council in order to jointly
and cooperatively publish bids for, award contracts for, and do the public
utility work for the Edinborough project.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner /Councilmember
Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Seven
Commissioner /Councilmember Bredesen then made a motion to award the bid for the
Edinborough public utility work to recommended low bidder, Annandale Sewer &
Water, for $331,284.17, subject to the closing on the property. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner /Councilmember Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Mayor Courtney adjourned the joint HRA /Council meeting at this point in the meeting.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED RELATING TO EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION. Mr. Erickson
recalled that at its May 6, 1985 meeting the HRA had adopted a resolution
relating to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and authorizing the execution
of the redevelopment contract, which has now been done. In addition, two
specific documents will be involved in the bond issue which the City authorized
for the elderly development, e.g. the Interest Reduction Agreement and Deed.
The Interest.Reduction Agreement is the payment by the HRA out of tax increment
of certain monies and the Deed provides for the low and moderate cost restrict-
ions. As recommended, Commissioner Bredesen introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN; RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS
AGREEMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF VARIOUS
OTHER DOCUMENTS
BE IT REVOLSED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved
a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, sub-
division 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ").
Acting pursuant to the Plan the HRA has acquired certain land in the area
included in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a
portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "),
pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted May 6, 1985, the HRA approved the
form of the Agreement and authorized the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant
Secretary of the HRA to execute and deliver the Agreement on behalf of the HRA
with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney
for the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authori-
zation the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA have executed and delivered the
Agreement to the Foundation. In connection with the transactions contemplated
by the Agreement there has been prepared and submitted to the HRA an Elderly
Housing Interest Reduction Agreement (the "Interest Reduction Agreement "),
dated as of October 1, 1985, between the HRA and the Edina Park Plaza
Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership to be formed
(the "Partnership "), and a Deed and Covenants Running with the Land (the "Deed ")
from the HRA to the Partnership.
2. Ratification of Execution and Delivery of Agreement. The execution
and delivery of the Agreement by the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA is
hereby ratified and affirmed.
3. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Further Documents. The
form of the Interest Reduction Agreement and Deed are hereby approved subject to
such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for
the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be con-
clusively evidenced by the execution of the Agreement by the Chairman and
Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the HRA. The Chairman and Secretary or
Assistant Secretary of the HRA are directed to execute the Interest Reduction
Agreement and the Deed. The Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
H.R.A. /COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1985
Page Eight
the HRA are also authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as
may be required to accomplish the transaction herein contemplated including
but not limited to any amendments or supplements to the Agreement, the Interest
Reduction Agreement and the Deed and other agreements as may be necessary to
accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Agreement. The execution of
any such amendments, supplements or agreements by the Chairman and Secretary or
Assistant Secretary of the HRA shall be conclusive evidence of the approval
of such documents by the HRA in accordance with this Resolution.
Dated this 7th day of October, 1985.
ATTEST:
Chairman
Executive Director
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Commissioner Turner, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in
favor thereof:
Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by
the Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director.
The HRA meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Bredesen, seconded by
Commissioner Turner. Motion carried.
Executive Director
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 7, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -137A AMENDED. Mr. Rosland
recalled that at its meeting of September 16, 1985 the Council had proposed to
reduce the special assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -137A relating to the
property located at 5700 -04 Hansen Road. Based on the.irregular. configuration of
the lot, it-was proposed that the assessable feet be reduced by one - third. Jim
Fosen, co -owner of the subject property, had.-..also requested that an allowance of
$1,000 be made as compensation for trees he..alleged were removed without his
consent. Mr. Hoffman advised that the co- owners have now proposed to accept a com-
promise reduced assessment based on 150 assessable feet or $3,000 because of the
narrow odd lot size. They have further agreed to withdraw any pending legal action
now or in the future against the City regarding removal of trees and also withdraw
their opposition to the parking restrictions on Hansen Road. Mr. Hoffman explained
that the compromise assessment proposed is based on a comparision of the subject
property with the assessable feet of the adjoining double dwelling unit to the
south. He reiterated staff's position that the contractor was not accountable for
the trees alleged to have been removed without consent. Mr. Hoffman added that the
Council could also base the assessment on the configuration of the lot. Mr. Fosen
commented that the irregular lot configuration was the reason they were requesting
a reduction; that the trees are a separate issue and they still feel trees were
removed from their property without consent but that they wished to resolve the
matter. Richard Pelava, co- owner, pointed out that the wedged shaped portion of
the lot slopes down into a valley and is unuseable.. Member Bredesen commented
that because the northern one -half of the property is essentially unuseable a
reduction of the assessment based on one -half the total footage could be justified.
After further discussion, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and
moved its- adoption,.subject to agreement by the co- owners of the property to
withdraw any pending legal action -now or in the future against the City regarding
removal -of trees and to withdraw their opposition to -the parking restrictions on
Hansen Road:
RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Special assessment for Street Improvement No. BA -137A is hereby amended to
reduce the assessment for Part of Lot 6 and 7, Garden Park (32- 117 -21 -0053) to
a total assessment of $3,400,00.
2. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor a
copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessment with each
then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended on the
tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED; SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. 5 -35 AUTHORIZED.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file.
Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as
hereinafter set forth:
A. SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -35 IN THE FOLLOWING:
West 44th Street, Woodcrest Drive and Park Place
Mr. Rosland presented the total estimated construction cost for Improvement
No. P -S -35 at $14,878.88, proposed to be assessed against 56 assessable lots at
an estimated cost of $250.00 per lot. Properties which do not have replacement
sidewalk constructed will not be assessed. Mr. Hoffman explained that the pro-
posed sidewalk repair project is similar to the Country Club District project
currently underway in which cracked, raised and /or sunken sidewalk is being
replaced. The project assessment is proposed to be spread over a three year
period. The proposed project would be done in the Fall of 1985 with assessment
in 1986 and the first installment due in 1978. He advised that a number of calls
had been received from property owners on the aforementioned streets requesting
the sidewalk replacement. Mr. Hoffman said that the sidewalk replacement work
could be handled as an addendum to the contract awarded to Victor Carlson and
Sons, Inc. for the sidewalk replacement currently being constructed in the
Country Club District. He added that no objections have'been received in
response to the Notice of Public Hearing that was mailed to affected property
owners. No objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
10/7/85
RESOLUTION.ORDERING IMPROVEMENT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. S -35
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council
heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners
of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed
improvement:
1. SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. S -35 IN THE FOLLOWING:
West 44th Street, Woodcrest Drive and Park Place
and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the
Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being
fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with
the construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be
necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and
rights for construction and maintnance of such improvement; that said improvement
is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. S -35 and the area to be specially assessed
therefore shall include some properties in the Colonial Grove Sixth Addition;
Lots 79 thru 92, Morningside; Lots 23 thru 27, Riley's Subdivison of Lots 3, 4,
5, 6, 7, 30 and 31 Grimes Homestead; Lots 14 thru 16 Melvin Grimes Subdivision;
Lots 11 thru 13 Grimes Homestead; and Lots 9 thru 15, Block 11, Browndale Park.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member .Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
VARIANCE GRANTED UPON APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DECISION FOR
5905 EWING AVENUE. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and
ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the appeal of Kelly
Doran, 5905 Ewing Avenue, from a Board of Appeals and Adjustments decision
for a two foot sideyard variance to expand an existing single car garage.
Mr. Larsen advised that the subject property is developed with a single family
dwelling with an attached one car garage. The proposed addition would add six
feet to the garage resulting in an overall garage width of 18 feet with a
three foot sideyard. The Zoning Ordinance requires that attached garages be
setback five feet from the interior property line. The purpose of the addition
is to eliminate the need to park on the grass and to jockey cars when a family
member leaves the home. Mr. Larsen pointed out that on this block between
58th and 50th Streets there are 19 other dwellings which have single car garages
and face the same problems as the proponent. All but two of these 19 homes
also do not have enough land available to widen their garages without a variance.
This indicates that there is not a hardship due to the unique nature of this lot
which is not encountered by other lots in the area. This block also contains.!_
11 sites with double garages. The average sideyard setback at these sites is
7.6 feet; no sideyard on the entire block is less than 5 feet. Mr. Larsen
advised that the variance request was_heard by the Board of Appeals and Adjust-
ments on September 5, 1985 and that the Board denied the request. The Board
felt that a hardship was not unique to this property. They also felt that
granting the variance could alter the character of the neighborhood and set an
undesirable precedent in the area. Kelly Doran, representing the property owner,
said he had surveyed the homes in the area bounded by 57th Street to the Cross-
town Highway and from France Avenue to Beard Avenue (approximately 260 homes).
Approximately one -half had single car garages and one -half had double car .
garages. In that area there are 11 cases wherein the dwelling or garage is
within five feet of the interior lot line. There were two garages which are
18 feet wide and one that is 19 feet wide. Based on those examples, Mr. Doran
requested that the variance be granted. He further stated that he had contacted
a garage builder who said that 18 foot wide garages are not uncommon and that
it would be adequate for two mid -sized cars and would not detract from the
value of the property. Member Turner asked if the Zoning Ordinance requires a
minimum garage size and if the City has granted variances on lot coverage for
conversion from a single to a double garage. Mr. Larsen responded that the
Zoning Ordinance only speaks to the size of enclosed parking spaces but does
not state a minimum garage size and that the City has granted variances both
as to lot coverage and setback to allow conversion to a double garage to meet
the Zoning Ordinance requirements. No further comment being heard, Member
Turner made a motion to approve the two foot sideyard variance request, based
on the fact that a double garage would meet ordinance requirements. Motion
was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -268 (BRAEMAR BOULEVARD) AND GOLF COURSE
CONSTRUCTION. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Street Improvement
No. BA -268 (Braemar Boulevard) and Braemar Golf Course construction for the
y 10/7/85
executive course. The bids were as follows:
Bidder
I Roadway
Golf Course
Total.
D.L.R. Construction
$405,242.01
$187,758.00
$593,000.01
D.H. Blattner & Sons, Inc.
421,324.15
235,412.50
6569737.65
G.L. Contracting
469,760.29
263,621.38
733,381.67
Matt Bullock Contracting
501,478.45
234,362.50
735,840.95
Buesing Bros.
504,276.42
245,999.00
750,275.42
Park Construction Company
530,714.71
278,133.64
808,848.35
Shafer Contracting
5729382.20
272,661.00
845,043.20
Bergstrom Realty
684,210.50
304,226.00
988,436.50
Lametti & Sons, Inc.
701,588.60
328,869.63
1,0899000.00
Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member
Kelly for award
of bid to recom-
mended low bidder, D.L.R.
Construction at a total bid of $5939000.01.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly,
Richards, Turner, Courtney
STRUCTURAL STEEL LABOR:
Motion carried.
3,769
BIDS AWARDED FOR VARIOUS PHASES OF BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE CONSTRUCTION.
Mr. Rosland presented tabluation of bids for the Braemar Golf Course Club House
explaining that these bids are for various phases of construction as directed
by the construction manager. The bids were as follows:
CONCRETE & MASONRY:
Hollenback & Nelson
$121,083'low bid
Kelleher
124,378
Mas -Con
135,799
Axel Ohman
145,000
PRECAST CONCRETE:
Spancrete
14,100
low bid
Molin
14,485
Bladholm
18,033
ROUGH CARPENTRY:
E 2 Construction
52,400
low bid
Crawford -Merz Company
59,500
STRUCTURAL STEEL:
Stein Brothers
11,051
low bid
Hemenway Iron Works
12,300
Minnetonka Iron Works
18,250
STRUCTURAL STEEL LABOR:
Vickerman
3,769
Midwest Erectors
5,000
(Recommendation to reject all
bids as low bidder provided
no bid bond
and
did not meet specifications.)
WOOD DECKING & GLUE
LAMINATED CONSTRUCTION: Structural Wood Corporation. 53,390
Building Pros, Inc. 29,196
(Lower bid was for material only - no bid bond provided)
Mr. Rosland recommended award of bid to low bidder for concrete & masonry, precast
concrete, rough carpentry and structural steel. Rejection of all bids for struct-
ural steel labor is recommended as low bidder provided no bid bond and did not meet
specifications. Mr. Rosland stated that because the cost for structural steel
labor is not in excess of $5,000 that the City will negotiate that purchase.
He explained that with regard to wood decking and glue laminated construction,
Structural Wood Corporation is the only company in the state that does this type-.
of construction and that the bid submitted by Building Pros, Inc. was for material
only. Therefore award of bid to Structural Wood Corporation is recommended.
Member Richards raised questions about the bid for wood decking and glue laminated
construction and suggested that award be continued to the next Council meeting to
allow staff to research that part of the construction for alternatives. Motion
of Member Richards was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bids to recommended
low bidders as follows:
Concrete & Masonary Hollenback & Nelson -$121,083
Precast Concrete Spancrete 14,100
Rough Carpentry E 2 Construction 52,400
Structural Steel Stein Brothers 11,051
to reject all bids for structural steel labor and to continue award of bid for
wood decking and glue laminated construction to the Council Meeting of October 21,
1985.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM (WEST 70TH STREET AND CORNELIA AV.
Mr. Rosland presented tabluation of bids for one full activated traffic control
signal system and intersection radius recor.struction at West 70th Street and
Cornelia Avenue showing Hoffmann Electric at $59,700.00, Ridgedale Electric at
$61,851,00, Electric Service Co. at $67,480.00, Eagan McKay at $67,524.00 and
C.S.I. Electric at $68,080.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member
Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Hoffmann Electric, at
$59,700.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
10/7/85
BID AWARDED FOR IRON REMOVAL TREATMENT - PLANT NO. 2. Mr. Rosland presented tab-
ulation of bids for iron removal treatment - Plant No. 2, repairing the filler
bed plates and removal of filter-media, showing Tonka Equipment Company at
$5,680.00 and Layne Minnesota at $7,125.00. Motion of Member Bredesen was
seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Tonka Equip-
ment Company at $5,680.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ACCESSORY USES /ZONING ORDINANCE TO BE CONSIDERED AT SPECIAL MEETING. Mr. Rosland
advised that, in accordance with the Council's directive, the report on Accessory
Uses as regulated by the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance.Ordinance, had been
reviewed by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its October 2,
1985 meeting. The Commission did not recommend that any changes be made. After
a brief discussion, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner setting
Monday, December 9, 1985 as a study session for Council to consider the report on
Accessory Uses.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RELOCATION STUDY AUTHORIZED FOR EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY. Mr. Rosland presented
the proposal submitted by Foster Dunwiddie, of Miller - Dunwiddie- Associates, Inc.,
for architectural /engineering services for the Relocation Study for the Edina
Historical Society not to exceed $2,150.00. He explained that the study would
analyze existing and future space requirements, review and analyze alternative
locations, review and analyze alternative locations for the Cahill School and
Grange Hall in Utley Park and would include estimated costs for the various
alternative locations. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the Society would like to
complete their relocation by the time the City celebrates its centennial in 1988.
The Society and The Edina Foundation have indicated that they are willing to split
the cost of the study with the City. The City's share of cost would be $1,075.00 .
which would be paid from contingencies. Member Richards introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby directs and authorizes the
Mayor and Manager to execute an agreement for architectural /engineering services
for the Relocation Study for the Edina Historical Society with Miller- Dunwiddie -
Associates, Inc. not to exceed $2,150.00.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen
Resolution adopted.
AMM METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE BOARD TASK FORCE REPORT NOTED. Member Turner called
the Council's attention to a report of the AMM Metropolitan Significance Board
Task Force which was formed to look at process type concerns in connection with
the proposed Megamall in Bloomington. The report stated that the metropolitan
significance••review whould.be conducted in a fair and impartial manner in accord-
ance with prescribed rules and regulations and upon completion the Metropolitan
Council should review the process itself under MS 473.173 and the adopted rules.
No formal action was taken.
EDINA FOOD SHELF LOCATED AT ST. PETER'S LUTHERAN CHURCH NOTED. Member Turner
advised that Edina now has a food shelf located at St. Peter's Lutheran Church,
54th Street and France Avenue, which has been established under the V.E.A.P.
program. No action was taken.
DEED FOR BONN PROPERTY.TO BE EXECUTED. Mr. Rosland reported that the survey of
Mrs. Jessie Bonn's property at 6005 Pine Grove Road, has been completed and that
the City Attorney is working on the deed for transfer of the property to the City
as a donation by Mrs. Bonn. Member Richards asked that the information be con-
veyed to Dr. Paul Carson who has made inquiry as to the status of this transfer.
No formal action was taken.
PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF UTILITY AND STREET EASEMENTS; DEWEY
HILL THIRD ADDITION. Mr. Rosland advised that a petition has been received.
requesting vacation of a utility easement and street easement located in Dewey
Hill Third Addition. As recommended by staff, Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY AND STREET PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minne-
sota as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easements for
utility and street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance
10/7/85
with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
The utility easement in Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Dewey Hill Third
Addition, as shown on and dedicated by the plat thereof, on file
and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
The utility easement in Outlot C, Dewey Hill Third Addition, as
shown on and dedicated by the plat thereof, on file and of record
in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
All that part of the public street known as "Glasgow Drive" dedicated
in the plat of Dewey Hill Third Addition, according to the plat thereof,
on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minne ota.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of
notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION
OF EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY AND STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County,' Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
November 4, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
the proposed vacation of the following easements for utility and street purposes:
(Legal descriptions as included in paragraph 1 of this resolution)
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or
not the above proposed easement vacations are in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed vacations affect existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacations and the extent to which the vacation affects
the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes,
mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue
maintaining the same or.to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for
the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which
any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter
upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REQUEST CONSIDERED FOR TAX - FORFEITED PARCEL TO BE CONVEYED AND ATTACHED TO LOT 3,
BLOCK-8, WOODBURY PARK (DAY PROPERTY). Mr. Kojetin presented the request of
Richard M. Day, 3511 West 55th Street, to release a parcel of land owned by the
City of Edina adjacent to his property (Lot 3, Block 8, Woodbury Park) which was
acquired by the City in 1966 as tax - forfeited land. He explained that Mr. Day's
concern for this piece of property goes back to 1951. At that time separating
his lot from Minnehaha Creek was a service road (platted-but never.developed)
and Lot A, 24 feet wide and running two blocks on the creek bank from Bears to
Drew Avenues. In approximately 1953 Mr. Day bought Lot A and divided it.with
his neighbors and as owners on both sides of the service road they petitioned
the City to vacate the road which was done. Lot A was divided and adjoined to
each respective lot along the creek except the parcel adjoining Mr. Day's lot
through an oversight by Hennepin County. In June of 1957 it was brought to
Mr. Day's attention that he did not own this small parcel and by action of the
county board the property was then acquired by Mr. Day. Mr. Kojetin pointed out
that between June 1957 and 1966 Mr. Day assumed that the taxes on -this small
parcel were included on his property tax statement when in reality they were not.
In 1966 the City of Edina acquired the parcel as tax forfeited land. Mr. Day,
now would like to resolve the issue and have the parcel attached to his property.
Richard Day was present and asked what the procedure would be to regain the parcel.
10/7/85
Mr. Kojetin explained that because the parcel is park property, the following
steps would have to be taken: 1) the Park Board would have to declare this
property as not needed for public usage, and 2) the City Council would have to
adopt a resolution stating that this is not needed for public use and return
the property to the State of Minnesota requesting that sale of the property be
limited to adjacent property owners. Following discussion, Member Turner made
a motion that the process as stated begin, that the matter be placed on the
Park Board agenda of October 8, 1985 and that it be brought back to the Council
on October 21, 1985 for action. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
LIQUOR FUND REPORTS as of July 31 and August 31, 1985 were presented, reviewed
and ordered place on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES FOR 1986 ON $5,400,000 GENERAL
OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1985 AND $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
REDEVELOPMENT BONDS ADOPTED. As recommended by the Finance Director, Member
Bredesen introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption:
RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1986 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $5,300,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal
and interest of its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1984; said
ad valorem tax in the amount of $1,217,000 being collectible with and as a
part of other general taxes for the year 1986; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said
levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for
said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the-required
moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted
September 10, 1984, and collectible with and as a part of other general property
taxes in said City for the year 1986, be and hereby are cancelled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota,
be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies
and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1986.
RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1986 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal
and interest of its $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bond; said ad
valo-- <-m tax in the amount of $210,500 being collectible with and as a part of
other general taxes for the year 1986; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said
levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for
said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required
moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted November
1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property taxes in
said City for the year 1986, be and hereby are cancelled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota,
be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies
and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1986.
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolutions adopted.
3,
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for payment
of the following claims dated 10/7/85: General Fund $235,815.41, Art Center
$1;248.59, Swimming Pool Fund $3,035.56, Golf Course Fund $27,262.44, Recreation
Center Fund $74,825.21, Utility Fund $32,955.63, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,047.80,
Construction Fund $20,966.61, IMP Bond Redemption Fund $313,308.00, Total $714,455.25.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
City Clerk
Commissioner
NQ� �
introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN; AMENDING THE 1985 PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota
(the "HRA ") , as follows:
1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously
approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast
Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes
a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax increment financing
plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district,
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision
9 (the "District "). The HRA and the Edina City Council have
approved amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment
to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment ").
The HRA has been informed that a parcel of land was inadvertently
omitted from the 1985 Project Area, as defined in the 1985
Amendment. The legal description of such omitted parcel
is Lot 1, Block 1, Northwestern Financial Center (the "Land ").
It has been proposed that the HRA include the Land in the
1985 Project Area. The Land was not intended to be included
in the District.
2. The ,1985 Project Area included in the 1985
Amendment is amended to include the Land, provided the Land
is not to be included in the District. The Edina City Council
is hereby requested to approve such amendment of the 1985
Project Area. Upon receipt of such approval by the Edina
City Council, the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney
for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed
with the amendment of the 1985 Project Area.
Dated this 4th day of November, 1985.
Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
i
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice
A` were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
presented the petition for preliminary plat approval noting that the subject
property is located south of Grove Street and on the east end of the cul -de -sac
=J on Oak Lane. The property is part of an earlier subdivision of the area and
measures 138 feet in width, 239 feet in depth and is 33,057 square feet in size.
The proponent is requesting a subdivision which would create one buildable.lot
of 12,237 square feet with the remaining 20,830 square feet designated as an
outlot. A previous replat of this property included the dedication of an
extension of Oak Lane east to Garden Avenue. Additional right of way must be
acquired before this could take place. The property is now accessed by a
temporary cul -de -sac which terminates in the northwesterly corner of the property.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proponents intent is to create one buildable lot
while reserving the balance of the property for future subdivision. Since the
balance of the property would be designated as an outlot, it would not be buildable
without replatting. The lot size of the proposed lot is similar to other lots
in the vicinity. At its June 26, 1985 meeting, the Community Development and
Planning commission approved the preliminary plat. No comment being heard, Member
Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN REPLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Austin Replat", platted by Curtis E. Austin,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July 15, 1985, be
and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member - Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
(425 WASHINGTON AVENUE). Affidavits of Notice were Clerk, approved
and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen s the subject property is
located at the corner of Washington A •Saloney Avenue. County Road 18 is
located to the immediate west o ite and Grandview Cemetery is to the south.
The property is a vacant asuring 70 feet in width, approximately 125 feet
in depth and contai 8 square feet of lot area. Robert Anderson, proponent,
is requestin ing of the site from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2
Double ng Unit District to allow the construction „c * ^ir dwelling.
Thy - t,acr �pac hPar(j .a r.__rha_r.T�.T_ r.nP, na C In E' t motion
i-
WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAY--.'
EasT
!i� x•24.32 %$m = =`- � -. ,.
=- - - 94.88 - - - -f 130.00 - -- --�'
a� I
�J "hm I I
�� •� 4 h
1 OUTLOT A
�J I
-% 10 -+1
ti 5
I I
b �I
- - - - -- 239 20
589'.58zrw !! - - - - --
:.�r
-r _.J
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR WARDEN ACRES AUSTIN 2ND REPLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Austin 2nd Replat ", platted by Curtis E.
Austin and Valborg J. Austin, husband and wife, and presented at the regular
meeting of the City Council of Edina be and is hereby granted final plat
approval.
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 4, 1985, and
as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 5th day of November, 1985.
City Clerk
T
73- • • �• r ice
Larsen explained that this is the same proper w is was jus rom
R -1 Single Dwelling District to R -2 Double Dwelling Dist urther
comments being heard, Member Turner introduced the
resolution and
moved its adoption: T APPROVAL
RESOLUTION GRANTING PREL
FOR FOLKS R. V _ BDIVISION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Cou e City af Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Fol torsen Subdivision," platted by Cardarelle
and Associates, and pr at the regular meeting of the City Council of
September 16, 1985 is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for ado the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall-
Ayes: en, Kell
yr
Lcu.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice
were presented.by Acting City Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen informed the Council that the proposed plat is located north of Green Farms
Road extended and west of Ridge Road. This plat represents a portion of approx-
imately 70 acres of vacant land which the owner, Carl Hansen, is developing for
single dwelling lots on an incremental basis. In 1978, the Planning Commission
and City Council approved a preliminary plat for the entire property, and today
approximately 129 lots remain from this preliminary plat. Mr. Larsen explained
that Mr. Hansen has submitted a plat illustrating 16 lots involving 7.902 acres.
Lots range from 15,396 square feet to 20,046 square feet in area. All of the lots
conform t& the standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen pointed
out that the plat shows the extension of Green Farms Road northerly to intersect
with adjacent property owned by Mr. Loufek. This property has received a pre -
liminary plat approval which illustrates the further extension of Green Farms Road
to intersect with Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Larsen continued that the City's
Engineering Department has reviewed the plat and has recommended modifications to
the proposed road grade. They have also recommended the installation of a storm
sewer to serve this property and adjacent property to the north. Mr. Larsen
concluded that staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat conditioned upon
a developer's agreement which satisfactorily addresses the road grade and storm
sewer issues. The plat is consistent with the overall preliminary plat approved
earlier, and the lots are generally consistent with other lots in the area. No
further comments being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption, subject to a satisfactory developer's agreement:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR -nARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition," platted by Carl M. Hansen,
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 16, 1985,
be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY FLAT OF.-
PARKWOOD KNOLLS ZZND ADDITION
NO 325
At
16 L076
� TOTAL AIM 144,7US Stem
M So, ADIC =.V.6 f4 fill Co.
Z,.. ZONED: lt-1 X A.Wdal D.0
isoo 7(K&wjvj S
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR PARKWOOD KNOLLS 22ND ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain plat entitled "Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addition ", platted by
Parkwood Knolls Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation, and Carl M.
Hansen and Helen M. Hansen, husband and wife, and presented at the Regular
Meeting of the City Council of Edina be and is hereby granted final plat
approval.
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 4, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 12th day of November, 1985.
City Clerk
=. 2).
M E M 0
DATE: November 1, 1985
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen
SUBJECT: Housing Revenue Bond Program, Grandview Development Co.
Attached is a copy of the Program for Housing Revenue Bonds for
Grandview Development Company which was considered by the City
Council at its October 7, 1985, meeting. In order to fully
comply with state law we published notice of a public hearing
on the program in The Edina Sun - Current on October 16, 1985.
Public comment is being accepted through the public hearing on
November 4, 1985.
A second resolution reaffirming the inducement resolution passed
on October 7, will be available prior to Monday's Council Meeting.
EXHIBIT A
City of Edina, Minnesota
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C
1. Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota
Limited Partnership (the "Developer ") intends to acquire
land in the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and construct
and equip thereon a multifamily residential rental facility
to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in part by
persons and families of low and moderate income. The site
is located at 5212 Vernon Avenue in the City. The development
will contain approximately 152 housing units, at least 20%
of which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate income,
under §103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended (the "Code "), and the Regulations thereunder.
.2. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its housing,revenue bonds under the Act
in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately
$13,840,000 to finance the acquisition of the site and the
construction and equipping of the development and facilities
functionally subordinate and related to the development.
3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for
the City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock through-
out the City, for persons residing in the City, including
persons of low and moderate income. The development to be
financed by the Program will assist the City in certain problems
addressed in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available
housing stock, (b) providing decent, sanitary and affordable
housing for residents of the City, including persons of low
and moderate income and their families.
4. The development will be a "multifamily housing
development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of §462C.02 of
the Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd. 4 of §462C.05 of the
Act. The income limitations set forth in Subd. 2 of §462C.05
of the Act will not apply to this development since it will
be located within a redevelopment project area under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462. In addition, as discussed in paragraph
1 of this Program, at least 20% of the units will be rented
or available for rental to persons of low and moderate income;
that is, with incomes not greater than 80% of the median
family income as estimated by the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical area
in which the City is located, currently $26,240.
s
5. To finance the development, the City intends
to issue is housing revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in
a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $13,840,000
(the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds
to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which
the Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to
repay the Bonds. The Bonds will be a special, limited obligation
of the City, payable solely from revenues derived from payments
to be made by the Developer under the revenue agreement and
pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured
by a mortgage and security interest in the development, or
by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one
or more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage loan
or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices.
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
HOUSING REVENUE BONDS
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting,
held on November 4, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City
Hall.
Members present:
Members absent:
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages):
MINUTES OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED
MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C,
MINNESOTA STATUTES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT;
APPROVING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM,
CONFIRMING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE
DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION
OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and
acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing
the bonds referred to in the title of this certificate, certify
that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have
been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body
of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as
they relate to said bonds; and that said meeting was duly
held by the governing body at the time and place and was
attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant
to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this day of , 1985.
(SEAL)
Signature
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Name and Title
The Mayor stated that this was the time and place
fixed by a resolution of this Council adopted on October
7, 1985, for a public hearing on the proposal that the City
undertake a program (the Program) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C. The City Clerk presented an affidavit showing
publication of the notice of public hearing at least once
not less than 15 days prior to the date fixed for the public
hearing, in the Edina Sun Current, a newspaper circulating
generally throughout the City. The affidavit was examined,
found to be satisfactory and ordered placed on file with
the City Clerk. The City Clerk presented any comments on
the Program submitted by Metropolitan Council.
The Mayor then opened the meeting for the public
hearing on the proposal to undertake the Program on behalf
of the Borrower. The purpose of the hearing was explained
and the nature of the Program and of the proposed revenue
bonds was discussed, and all persons present who desired
to do so were afforded an opportunity to express their views
with respect to the proposal to undertake and finance the
Program, in respect to which the following persons either
appeared, were recognized and made statements, or filed written
comments with the City Clerk before the date set for the
hearing, summaries of which appear opposite their respective
names:
Name of Speaker Summary of Views
After all persons who wished to do so had stated
or filed their views on the proposal, the Mayor declared
the public hearing closed.
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C,
MINNESOTA STATUTES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT;
APPROVING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM
CONFIRMING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE
DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION
OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized
to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations
to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily
housing developments within its boundaries which revenue
bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues
of the development or other security pledged therefor.
1.02. Representatives of Grandview Development
Company, a Minnesota Limited Partnership (the "Developer "),
have advised this Council of its desire to acquire land located
within the geographical limits of the City at 5212 Vernon
Avenue and construct and equip thereon a multifamily rental
apartment building containing approximately 152 units, together
with parking and related and subordinate facilities (the
"Development "). The Development is intended primarily for
occupancy by elderly persons. Total development and financing
costs are presently estimated by the Developer to be
approximately $13,840,000.
1.03. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or more series
(the "Bonds ") pursuant to the authority of the Act in such
aggregate principal amount as may be necessary to finance
all or a portion of the costs of the Development and make
the proceeds of the Bonds available to the Developer, directly
or indirectly, for the acquisition, construction and equipping
of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer
to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
1.04. By a resolution adopted on October 7, 1985,
entitled "Resolution Relating to the Issuance of Revenue
Bonds Pursuant to Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes, for the
Purpose of.Financing a Multifamily Housing Development; Giving
Preliminary Approval to the Development and Calling for a
Public Hearing Thereon" (the "Resolution "), this Council
gave preliminary approval to the Development and the issuance
of the Bonds by the City to finance all or a portion of the
costs thereof.
1.05. A multifamily housing program has been prepared
pursuant to the requirements of subdivision 5 of Section
462C.05 of the Act for the Development and the issuance of
the Bonds (the "Program "), a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit A hereto. A copy of the Program has been submitted
to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment.
1.06. At a public hearing, duly noticed and held
on November 4, 1985, in accordance with the Act and Section
103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended,
on the Program, any comments on the Program submitted by
the Metropolitan Council were presented to the Council and
all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity
to express their views with respect to the Program and interested
persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments
to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
Section 2. Approvals and Authorization.
2.01. The Program is hereby approved and the approvals
contained in the Resolution are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2.02. In accordance with Section 462C.04 , subdivision
2 of the Act, the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to cause the Program to be submitted to the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for review. The Mayor,
City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, employees
and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed
to provide the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency with any
preliminary information needed for this purpose. The City
Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation
of such documents as may be appropriate to the Development,
the Bonds and the Program.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota this 4th day of November, 1985.
Attest:
City Clerk
-2-
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution
was duly seconded by Member and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted
and was signed by the Mayor whose signature was attested
by the City Clerk.
-3-
EXHIBIT A
City of Edina, Minnesota
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C
1. Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota
Limited Partnership (the "Developer ") intends to acquire
land in the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and construct
and equip thereon a multifamily residential rental facility
to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in part by
persons and families of low and moderate income. The site
is located at 5212 Vernon Avenue in the City. The development
will contain approximately 152 housing units, at least 20%
of which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate income,
under §103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended (the "Code "), and the Regulations thereunder.
2. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its housing revenue bonds under the Act
in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately
$13,840,000 to finance the acquisition of the site and the
construction and equipping of the development and facilities
functionally subordinate and related to the development.
3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for
the City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock through-
out the City, for persons residing in the City, including
persons of low and moderate income. The development to be
financed by the Program will assist the City in certain problems
addressed in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available
housing stock, (b) providing decent, sanitary and affordable
housing for residents of the City, including persons of low
and moderate income and their families.
4. The development will be a "multifamily housing
development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of §462C.02 of
the Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd. 4 of §462C.05 of the
Act. The income limitations set forth in Subd. 2 of §462C.05
of the Act will not apply to this development since it will
be located within a redevelopment project area under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462. In addition, as discussed in paragraph
1 of this Program, at least 20% of the units will be rented
or available for rental to persons of low and moderate income;
that is, with incomes not greater than 80% of the median
family income as estimated by the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical area
in which the City is located, currently $26,240.
5. To finance the development, the City intends
to issue is housing revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in
a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $13,840,000
(the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds
to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which
the Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to
repay the Bonds. The Bonds will be a special, limited obligation
of the City, payable solely from revenues derived from payments
to be made by the Developer under the revenue agreement and
pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured
by a mortgage and security interest in the development, or
by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one
or more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage loan
or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices.
:PM
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 462C,
MINNESOTA STATUTES, FOR THE PURPOSE OF
FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT;
APPROVING A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING PROGRAM
CONFIRMING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE
DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION
OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized
to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or obligations
to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily
housing developments within its boundaries which revenue
bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues
of the development or other security pledged therefor.
1.02. Representatives of Grandview Development
Company, a Minnesota Limited Partnership (the "Developer "),
have advised this Council of its desire to acquire land located
within the geographical limits of the City at 5212 Vernon
Avenue,and construct and equip thereon a multifamily rental
apartment building containing approximately 152 units, together
with parking and related and subordinate facilities (the
"Development "). The Development is intended primarily for
occupancy by elderly persons. Total development and financing
costs are presently estimated by the Developer to be
approximately $13,840,000.
1.03. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its revenue bonds in one or more series
(the "Bonds ") pursuant to the authority of the Act in such
aggregate principal amount as may be necessary to finance
all or a portion of the costs of the Development and make
the proceeds of the Bonds available to the Developer, directly
or indirectly, for the acquisition, construction and equipping
of the Development, subject to agreement by the Developer
to pay promptly the principal of and interest on the Bonds.
1.04. By a resolution adopted on October 7, 1985,
entitled "Resolution Relating to the Issuance of Revenue
t
Bonds Pursuant to Chapter 462C, Minnesota Statutes, for the
Purpose of.-Financing a Multifamily Housing Development; Giving
Preliminary Approval to the Development and Calling for a
Public Hearing Thereon" (the "Resolution "), this Council
gave preliminary approval to the Development and the issuance
of the Bonds by the City to finance all or a portion of the
costs thereof.
1.05. A multifamily housing program has been prepared
pursuant to the requirements of subdivision 5 of Section
462C.05 of the Act for the Development and the issuance of
the Bonds (the "Program "), a copy of which is attached as
Exhibit A hereto. A copy of the Program has been submitted
to the Metropolitan Council for review and comment.
1.06. At a public hearing, duly noticed and held
on November 4, 1985, in accordance with the Act and Section
103(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended,
on the Program, any comments on the Program submitted by
the Metropolitan Council were presented to the Council and
all parties who appeared at the hearing were given an opportunity
to express their views with respect to the Program and interested
persons were given the opportunity to submit written comments
to the City Clerk before the time of the hearing.
Section 2. Approvals and Authorization.
2.01. The Program is hereby approved and the approvals
contained in the Resolution are hereby ratified and confirmed.
2.02. In accordance with Section 462C.04 , subdivision
2 of the Act,. the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to cause the Program to be submitted to the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for review. The Mayor,
City Manager, City Attorney and other officers, employees
and agents of the City are hereby authorized and directed
to provide the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency with any
preliminary information needed for this purpose. The City
Attorney is authorized to initiate and assist in the preparation
of such documents as may be appropriate to the Development,
the Bonds and the Program.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota this 4th day of November, 1985.
Attest:
City Clerk
-2-
Mayor
�i -19,
EXHIBIT A
City of Edina, Minnesota
PROGRAM FOR A MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
CHAPTER 462C
1. Grandview Development Company, a Minnesota
Limited Partnership (the "Developer ") intends to acquire
land in the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and construct
and equip thereon a multifamily residential rental facility
to be occupied primarily by elderly persons and in part by
persons and families of low and moderate income. The site
is located at 5212 Vernon Avenue in the City. The development
will contain approximately 152 housing units, at least 20%
of which will be rented to persons of "low and moderate income,
under §103(b)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as amended (the "Code "), and the Regulations thereunder.
2. Representatives of the Developer have requested
that the City issue its housing revenue bonds under the Act
in a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately
$13,840,000 to finance the acquisition of the site and the
construction and equipping of the development and facilities
functionally subordinate and related to the development.
3. The City's Housing Plan serves as a basis for
the City's goal of providing a variety of housing stock through -
out,the City, for persons residing in the City, including
persons of low and moderate income. The development to be
financed by the Program will assist the City in certain problems
addressed in the Housing Plan, including (a) increasing available
housing stock, (b) providing decent, sanitary and affordable
housing for residents of the City, including persons of low
and moderate income and their families.
4. The development will be a "multifamily housing
development" within the meaning of Subd. 5 of §462C.02 of
the Act, undertaken pursuant to Subd. 4 of §462C.05 of the
Act. The income limitations set forth in Subd. 2 of §462C.05
of the Act will not apply to this development since it will
be located within a redevelopment project area under Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462. In addition, as discussed in paragraph
1 of this Program, at least 20% of the units will be rented
or available for rental to persons of low and moderate income;
that is, with incomes not greater than 80% of the median
family income as estimated by the United States Department
of Housing and Urban Development for the statistical area
in which the City is located, currently $26,240.
5. To finance the development, the City intends
to issue is housing revenue bonds pursuant to the Act, in
a maximum aggregate principal amount of approximately $13,840,000
(the Bonds). The City will lend the proceeds of the Bonds
to the Developer pursuant to a revenue agreement in which
the Developer agrees to make loan repayments sufficient to
repay the Bonds. The Bonds will be a special, limited obligation
of the City, payable solely from revenues derived from payments
to be made by the Developer under the revenue agreement and
pledged to the payment of the Bonds. The Bonds may be secured
by a mortgage and security interest in the development, or
by some form of credit enhancement (which may include one
or more letters of credit, insurance on the mortgage loan
or the Bonds), or by a combination of such security devices.
-2-
z. C'.
M E M 0
DATE: November 1, 1985
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: Reallocation of Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Funds
As you will recall the City Council on June 17, voted a preliminary
commitment of $195,000 for the Woodhaven elderly housing development.
City funding would be provided with CDBG funds. The project has now
received a mortgage commitment from HUD, and a spring construction
start is planned.
It appears that the most efficient way to assist the project would
be for the City to provide funds to the East Edina Foundation which
will in turn provide funding for the project. This approach, which
should significantly reduce required red -tape, has been approved by
HUD and Hennepin County. It will be necessary to reprogram existing
CDBG budgets to accomplish this assistance.
In addition to assistance to the Woodhaven project, a reprogramming
of funds will be necessary to assist the remodeling of the Golf
Course and to provide an adequate level of funding for our rehab
program. The funds for the golf course will provide handicapped
access and handicapped equiped restrooms on the lower level. The
increased budget for rehab will provide funds for pending applications.
Funding for both projects would come from the Grandview Land Acquisi-
tion project which was initially intended to provide funds for the
redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel.
Staff would suggest the following reprogramming of CDBG funds:
PRESENT PROPOSED
YEAR PROJECT BUDGET BUDGET
X Land Acquisition 70,743 0
X Housing Sponsor 60,000 130,743
X Grandview 108,205 38,205
X Handicapped
Improvements 10,000 50,000
XI REHAB 20,000 40,000
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council.does hereby request the following
re- allocation of funds in Years X and XI of the Community Development Block
Grant Program:
Year X
Land Acquisition
Special Project
(East Edina Housing Foundation)
Year XI
Land Acquisition /Grandview
Architectural Barriers
Rehab of Private Properties
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
Existing Budget Proposed Budget
$ 70,743 $ -0-
60,000 130,743
108,205 48,205
10,000 50,000
20,000 40,000
$268,948 $268,948
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 4, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 12th day of November, 1985.
City Clerk
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION
OF EASEMENTS FOR UTILITY AND STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
November 4, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on the proposed vacation of the following easements for utility and street
purposes:
The utility easement in Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Dewey Hill Third
Addition, as shown on and dedicated by the plat thereof, on file
.and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota.
The utility easement in Outlot C, Dewey Hill Third Addition, as
shown on and dedicated by the plat thereof, on file and of record
in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
All that part of the public street known as "Glasgow Drive" dedicated
in the plat of Dewey Hill Third Addition, according to the plat thereof,
on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or
not the above proposed easement vacations are in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed vacations affect - existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacations and the extent to which the vacation affects
the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes,
mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue
maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for
the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which
any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter
upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
x�
p/ 85°76 '35"E
ea•.: .:.,e 39/.50
/3079 U
3 0
BENCHMARK- DOU& E SPIKE
ON NORTH SIDE OF /O" GLASGOW
oanor
DRIVE
MAPLE TREE; ELEV• 83400 FEET- g 4 \ \
(K6V0
1
N89050.9 'E �'t N89s0'34£ Z % $�
187. S7 /3O 43
65.00
O U T' L O/ omit /ot c 0.
•
883-48100"r _ • b NW S0147 2 ,
304.4/ - - 18753/
a 73: 153.91 ~ W
y, R Ccntro/ Structare 1 I r1 h
° ♦`k ^- oidinory high weteii I I t< u y
E/ew- 8Z9.5 feet ^ I I g
_ � � —� � /
*. h
I easement
I
oUrcor
-� op� I
3t !t w.,, 1 ~ h
I O 1 ut.Lt lasemPnt' I - ., ` ^ cerkv /n[ or
r � � Pssernent -� I I I
. <. POND
so 1
•� � r � 30526 A.
v IN PONDELEV.°
825.3 FEET / J_ I
r - -- I
�` I—p I ORTE 11 -3-80 'S
N.6.V.D. 1929 �; ---
hI `- ttntir /ne of teremtnt � N x� ' ' p 1
Q , •'� ♦•Ij �-
�; p L;, j i i�qe of_
=seer
09'54" d • 3 80 "
J )
303.63 i t -- d c l Jr'09
— 320.16 - 176.84 /0.00 138Z� " �.
d.7 °16'3/ a 507 °28'I / E R'
R =1392.70
Sia Car S
I "
I
1
o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT
AS DESCRIBED 8ELONx UNLESS t
_ OTNER/s'ISE INDICATED. i
l NOTE 3
QERTY
SCAL £ - }
/N FEET a- R.Lrs: - - -e^
/00 0 /00 200 !?
(110 7095 Qm
3^ ,) O 30 60 tiOT p15�J
''�• •• ^� ^^ 74' 1 oNr ipoN Yl1N ww, °Nn _
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Aluminum Windows and Doors - Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Ford McNutt Glass Company
2. Brin Northwestern Glass Company-
-4
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$ 45,250
52,400
�. Val Pro* Inc. 51,168
4. W. L. Hall - Did not bid on all items 41,697
Department Recommendation:
Ford McNutt Glass Company
Departmen
Finance Director's Endorsemer,,,.
The recommended bid
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N; Dalen, Finance Director
City Maaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Co cil approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: I
nnoth Ros l and, Cilty
nager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: 'Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Sprinkler 'System - Braemar Clubhouse
Braemar Golf Course
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. National Automatic Sprinkler Co.
2. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co.
1. All American Mechanical Inc.
Department Recommendation:
National Automatic SF
Finance Director's Endorsen:���,,.
The recommended b%(:i;_
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 33,000
$ 37,870
$ 37,000
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
) W
J. N, Dalen, Finance Director
City M ger's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
J -A
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEPI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Roofing, Flashing, Sheet Metal and Sky Lights - Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Ouote or Bid
�. Curran V. Neilson $ 40,800
2 Dalbec Roofing
1, Faircon Roofing, Inc.
Department Recommendation:
Curran V. Neilson
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bi is
$ 42,232
$ 45,315
is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
Ci7-71. ager's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the De
the purchase. Partrrent and recommend Council approve
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kennetro Rosland, City Manager
1 «QUtSi tc)k t'URG"1 E1SE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J.-Hoffman, Director of Public Works
AA: Kenneth Rosland, City flanaver
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEPI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 1, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Computerized Engine Analyzer
Quotations /Bids:
Company
I. Sun Electric
2• Bear Automotive
Allen Test Products
L�' C
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$ 14,950.00
.14,999.00
17,119.20
Department Recommendation j�0.4 e%r rfdVe y /Pf ,- ��o•+a�eM 1:�.;, OM
G
Signa re Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
_ the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Eberhardt
3250 West 66th Street
P.O. Box 1385
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440
612/920 -9280
C
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: EDINA CENTENNIAL - 1988
DATE: October 31, 1985
You may recall, during budget hearings, I mentioned to you that the City's
Centennial Celebration is coming up very quickly. At that time, I noted
that it was important to think of budgetary considerations for the
Centennial Celebration. I also mentioned that it was important to consider
who would spearhead the organization of the City's celebration activities.
You may want to look at designating a currently standing organization such
as the Edina Historical Society, The Foundation, the Chamber of Commerce,
etc.; as the steering committee. _There are a number of options available
to choose from. My suggestion is that you look toward what will provide
the broadest base of participation of residents and organizations within
the community. That might best be achieved through your appointment of
a committee similar to the Bicentennial Commission that we had a number
of years ago.
I wanted to bring this to your attention in order that you may provide
direction in this endeavor.
KR /sw
4/18/83
265
had not responded to the resolution adopted by Council on December 20, 1982,
requesting that the speed limit be reduced from 40.MPH to 30 MPH from View
Lane to Villa Way, and that the community affected should have a voice as to
speed limits in a residential area. No action was taken.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. As recommended by Mr. Hoffman, Member
Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -260
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as
to the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice
of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements,
said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, May 16, 1983, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once
a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not
(� less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all
affected properties in substantially the following form:
U (Official Publication)
M CITY OF EDINA
W 4801 W. 50TH STREET
Q EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE-OF PUBLIC HEARING
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
WITH CONCRETE CURB.AND.GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -260
THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL will meet at the Edina City Hall,.on Monday, May 16, 1983,
at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed
under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approxi-
mate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below:
ESTIMATED COST
1. Golf Terrace - From Wooddale. Avenue, Westerly 2100 $128,356.21
Feet Plus or Minus
The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of improvement BA -260 include:
Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 3; Lots 1
thru 9, Block 2 and vacated streets, Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, and.Lots 2 and 3,
Block 4, Golf Terrace Heights Addition.
Florence B. Norback
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Nays: None
Resolution adopted.
THE EDINA FOUNDATION /HISTORICAL SOCIETY TO SPEARHEAD CITY CENTENNIAL CELEBRATION
IN 1988. Mr. Rosland presented the request of The Edina Foundation Board of
Directors that Council approve and direct The Edina Foundation Board to spear-
head a 1988 Centennial Celebration for the City of Edina. Member Bredesen
asked what role the Edina Historical Society would play in the planning to
which Mr. Rosland responded that the Historical Society would be involved
but that the Foundation would have the ability to provide funding if needed.
Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner directing The Edina
Foundation Board together with the Edina Historical Society to spearhead a
Centennial Celebration for the City in 1988.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FORMATION OF SENIOR CITIZEN AD HOC COMMITTEE TABLED. Mr. Rosland presented
the request of the Edina Human Relations Commission for Council sanction of
the formation of a Senior Citizen Ad Hoc Committee, as a sub - committee of the
Commission, with the purpose of assessing the needs of senior citizens in Edina.
Katherine Sehlin has offered to assemble the committee drawing on interested
citizens from the community. Mr. Rosland stated that if the committee were
authorized, he would like it to not only assess the needs of the seniors, but
to also determine what the seniors could provide for this community. Member
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland DATE: November 1, 1985
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License
The on -sale wine license application of the below - listed establishment has
been investigated in accordance with applicable Statutes and ordinances:
Szechuan Star Restaurant
3655 Hazel ton Rd.
Edina, MN 55435
The findings of this investigati.on does not reveal information that is
contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the Council move to approve the application and
issuance of an on -sale wine license.for the listed establishment conditioned
upon approval by the State of Minnesota. And, instruct the City Clerk to
forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval.
CRAIG VF SWANSON
CHIEF POLICE
CGS:nah
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: October 25, 1985
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Colleen Paulus
SUBJECT: Approval of wine application
The Szechuan Star restaurant located at 3655 Hazelton Road, Edina,
Minnesota has been approved for the service wine. The establish-
ment was evaluated for adequate storage space for wine, glassware
storage and the method of dispensing.
BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION '-
1246 UNIVERSITY AVENUE S�
ST. PAUL. MINNESOTA 55104 -4197 /J �
TELEPHONE: 296.2662
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
-A
Some time ago your department requested that*our Laboratory provide you with
preliminary breath test (PBT) instruments. I am happy to send you the documents
necessary to fulfill this request. You will find a sample resolution which
must be passed by your governing body, a copy of the agreement for the loan
of PBTIs and instructions on completing these documents.
When the resolution is passed, the officials authorized by it can complete the
agreement. This together with a certified copy of the resolution passed by your
governing body must be returned to the Forensic Science Laboratory. Once we
receive the agreement and resolution we will be able to schedule one or more
officers from you department for the necessary training and at that time we
will issue instruments to you.
You will note that on page three of the agreement we have indicated the number
of instruments this agreement is permitted to cover. The number of'instruments
we actually issue may be smaller than this figure depending on how many we have
available. At the time we schedule the training we will inform you of the
precise number of instruments that will be issued.
When complete, please return all documents to the BCA Forensic Science
Laboratory, Breath Test Section. If you have any questions contact Bob
Mooney, or Eldon Ukestad at 612- 296 -7940.
Sincerely yours,
well
�,;, c.
Lo C. Van Berkom
Director
Forensic Science Laboratory
Encl.
LCV:dse
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Sample
PBT RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of
an .agreement with the State of Minns
purpose of receiving from the State
preliminary breath test instruments
officers to assist in the detection
Minnesota Statutes Section 169.121,
therewith.
enter into
:sota, Department of Public Safety for the
of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety,
on a loan basis for use by law enforcement
of motorists who may be in violation of
or local ordinances in conformity
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the and
be and they hereby are authorized to execute such agreement.
State of Minnesota
City of
I hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of
at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the
day of 19 ,
as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
City Clerk
PBT RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, Minnesota, enter into an agreement
with the state of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety for the purpose
of receiving from the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety,
preliminary breath test instruments on a loan basis for use by law
enforcement officers to assist in the detection of motorists who may be
in violation of Minnesota Statutes Section 169.121, or local ordinances
in conformity therewith.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager be and they hereby are
authorized to execute such agreement.
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I hereby certify that the forgoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
the resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 4th day
of November, 1985, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
City Clerk
it -y -4i
V
Edina City Clerk
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Council Members:
I would like
to petition the Edina City Council to take
bids and install
my sanitary
sewer connection. I understand
that the
bid will be awarded
to a licensed plumber who submits the lowest
qualified
bid. I also
understand
that the cost of this connection,
including
the sewer availability
charge, will
be assessed against my property
for six years at 7E$ interest.
Enclosed is a signed an notarized waiver document.
Sincerely,
Name / Date Address
Enc.
DV /lde
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE I�
TO: Mayor and City Council
ROM: David A. Velde
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Sanitary sewer connection for 6528 Maloney. The cost of the connection plus SAC
fee to be assessed against the property.
Quotations /Bids:
. Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Ray Haeg Plumbing $5595.00
2. Richfield Plumbing
Hopkins Plumbing
Department Recommendation:
$5000.00
$5100.00
Hopkins Plumbing at $5100.00 as per homeowners request:
All bids are plus road repair costs
Si-
gnature Depa tment
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is V is not within
amount budget for the purchase.
N. Dal n, Finance Director
City M, nager's Endorsement: V
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosl 'nd, City Manager
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN: AMENDING THE 1985 PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan
and redevelopment project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq.,
and a tax increment financing plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, subdivision 9, designating as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Plan (the "Plan "). The Plan established a tax increment financing district,
as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9 (the "District ").
This Council and the HRA have approved amendments to the Plan designated as the
1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment ").
The HRA has informed this Council that a parcel of land was inadvertently
omitted from the 1985 Project Area, as defined in the 1985 Amendment. The
legal description of such omitted parcel is Lot 1, Block 1, Northwestern
Financial Center (the "Land "). The HRA has approved the inclusion of the Land
in the 1985 Project Area. The HRA has requested that this Council approve the
inclusion of the Land in the 1985 Project Area. The Land was not intended and
will not be included in the District.
2. Approval. The inclusion of the Land in the 1985 Project Area is hereby
approved; provided that the Land is not to be included in the District.
ADOPTED this 4th day of November, 1985.
C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
ATTEST:
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk