Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-02_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 2, 1985 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of HRA Meeting of November 4, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 18, 1985, and Special Meeting of November 13, 1985, approved as submitted by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Barbara W. Feiler, 5201 Duncraig Road - Generally located north of Vernon Avenue and north of Duncraig Road (Cont'd from 11/18/85) B. Set Hearing Date (12/16/85) 1. Zoning Change - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors District and Preliminary Plat Approval - Grandview Development Company 2. Final Development Plan - Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 So. County Road 18 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Steiner, Gilason - 4301 -05 W. 62nd Street, Lots 41 and 42, South Harriet Park II. PUBLIC HEARING ON UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Utility Easement Vacation - Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS A. Snow Plow Cutting Edges B. Handicapped Bathrooms - Edina Art Center V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Recommendation for Issuance of On -Sale Wine License - Empress Restaurant B. AMM Study of Metropolitan Significance Review Process C. 1986 Council Work Plan D. Signal Plan Approval - Londonderry Drive /County 418 E. Hennepin County Appointments - 1986 F. Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement - SWSCC G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council H. Post Agenda and 11anager's Miscellaneous Items VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. A. The Edina Foundation - Resolution Regarding Terms of Members B. Tax - Forfeited Land - Report No. P1421101 dated 10/9/85 VII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading 1. Ordinance No. 902 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 to Provide That Annual On -Sale Liquor Licenses Shall Expire on the lst Day of July Agenda Edina City Council December 2, 1985 Page Two VIII. FINANCE A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the following claims dated 12/2/85: General Fund $757,107.89, Working Capital Fund $30,761.15, Art Center $914.45, Golf Course Fund $134,597.72, Recreation Center Fund $13,694.79, Gun Range Fund $638.40, Utility Fund $2,138,816.33, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,752.08, Construction Fund $118,944.29, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,106,061.17, Total $4,313,288.27 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Dec. 2 Regular Council Meeting Mon Dec. 9 Special Council Meeting - Accessory Uses 7:00 p.m. Council Rm. 7:00 p.m. Conference Rm Mon Dec. 16 Regular Council Meeting _ 7:00 p.m. Council Rm AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING DECEMBER 2, 1985 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of HRA Meeting of November 4, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 18, 1985, and Special Meeting of November 13, 1985, approved as submitted by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat Approval * 1. Barbara W. Feiler, 5201 Duncraig Road - Generally located north of Vernon Avenue and north of Duncraig Road (Cont'd from 11/18/85) B. ;. Set Hearing Date (12/16/85) 1. Zoning Change - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors District and Preliminary Plat Approval- - Grandview Development Company 2. Final Development Plan - Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 So. County Road 18 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Steiner, Gilason - 4301 -05 W. 62nd Street, Lots 41 and 42, South Harriet Park II. PUBLIC HEARING ON UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A. Utility Easement Vacation - Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IV. AWARD OF BIDS A. Snow Plow Cutting Edges * B. Handicapped Bathrooms - Edina Art Center V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Recommendation for Issuance of On -Sale Wine License - Empress Restaurant * B. AMM Study of Metropolitan Significance Review Process C. 1986 Council.Work Plan * D. Signal Plan Approval - Londonderry Drive /County X618 * E. Hennepin County Appointments - 1986 * F. Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement - SWSCC G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council H. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. The Edina Foundation - Resolution Regarding Terms of Members * B. Tax - Forfeited Land - Report No. P1421101 dated 10/9/85 VII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading * 1. Ordinance No. 902 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 to Provide That Annual On -Sale Liquor Licenses Shall Expire on the 1st Day of July Agenda Edina City Council December 2, 1985 Page Two VIII. FINANCE Yz� A. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by , for payment of the following claims dated 12/2/85: General Fund $757,107.89, Working Capital Fund $30,761.15, Art Center $914.45, Golf Course Fund $134,597.72, Recreation Center Fund $13,694.79, Gun Range Fund $638.40, Utility Fund $2,138,816.33, Liquor Dispensary Fund_$1,752.08, Construction Fund $118,944.29, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,106,061.17, Total $4,313,288.27 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon Dec. 2 Regular Council Meeting Mon Dec. 9 Special Council Meeting - Accessory Uses Mon Dec. 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Rm. 7:00 p.m. Conference Rm 7:OO p.m. Council Rm MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 4, 1985 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, and Courtney. MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of October 7, 1985 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING PROPERTY WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. Mr. Rosland explained that.when the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approved the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan A,parcel of land was inadvertently omitted from the 1985 Project Area. It is recommended that the Council adopt a resolution amending the 1985 Project Area to include this parcel. Commissioner Bredesen then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; AMENDING THE 1985 PROJECT AREA BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74. The Plan established a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.17, subdivision 9 (the "District "). The HRA and the Edina City Council have approved amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "). The HRA has been informed that a parcel of land was inadvertently omitted from the 1985 Project Area, as defined -in the 1985 Amendment. The legal description of such omitted parcel is Lot 1, Block 1, Northwestern Financial Center (the "Land "). It has been proposed that the _HRA include the Land in the 1985 Project Area. The Land was not intended to be included in the District. 2. The 1985 Project Area included in the 1985 Amendment is amended to include the Land, provided the Land is not to be included in the District. The Edina City Council is hereby requested to approve such amendment of the 1985 Project Area. Upon receipt of such approval by the Edina City Council, the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the amendment of the 1985 Project Area. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Attest: Director Chairman H.R.A. Minutes. of November 4, 1985 Page Two There being no further business on the HRA agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Motion carried. Gordon L. Hughes Executive Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 18, 1985 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PRESENTS CHECK TO CITY. Ms. Aileen Kulah, President of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, presented a check in the amount of $7,500 to the City and explained that this represents the participation of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in the development of Bredesen Park. Mayor Courtney extended thanks on behalf of the Council Members and the City for the contribution. EMPLOYEE COLLEEN PAULUS COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Colleen Paulus, Assistant Sanitarian, advising that she has been employed by the City since 1979. He explained that.her chief responsibility is the inspection of the City's restaurants and that she has developed a slide presentation for food.handlers and a complaint assignment chart for monitoring the restaurants. Mr. Rosland commended Mrs. Paulus for her excellent work and presented her with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council also expressed their appreciation for her dedication and effort. MINUTES of the October 21 and November 4, 1985 Regular Meetings and Special Meet- ings of October 21, November 4 and November 12, 1985 were approved as submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by.Member Kelly. Ayes.:' Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BARBARA FEILER CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 2, 1985; FINDINGS, REASONS AND DECISION TO BE PREPARED. Affidavits of Notice.were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for pre- liminary plat approval for Lot 23 and.the north 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Block 1, Edina Highlands noting that the subject property is located on the northerly end of the Duncraig Road cul -de -sac. Directly east of the property is the Villa Way apartment complex and to the north, west and south are developed single family lots. The property contains approximately 73,000 square feet and is developed with a single family dwelling. The existing dwelling is located in the notch in the northwesterly corner of Lot 23, directly north of the existing house on Lot 22. The easterly three - quarters of Lot 23 is characterized by steep slopes. Mr. Larsen advised that the proponent has submitted a proposal to subdivide the property in order to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain approximately 31,500 square feet and the lot remaining for the existing dwelling would contain 41,400 square feet, which would include the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22. The new lot would meet or exceed the minimum standards for established in the Zoning Ordinance. However, the lot remaining for the existing dwelling would not meet the minimum frontage or lot widths standards of the Ordinance. The lot would have a frontage of approximately 10 feet on the street where 30 feet is re- quired. The Ordinance also requires that lots provide a minimum width of 75 feet at a point 50 feet from the front property line. The lot for the existing dwell- ing would have a width of 22 feet. The new Zoning Ordinance established standards for lot width and frontage on a public street to help define neck lots. The lot remaining for. °the_existing dwelling would be a neck'.lot. Mr.._Larsen.showed a graphic illustrating the original conceptual development plan for the Edina Highlands subdivision. The building site contemplated for the subject property is shown near where the proponents propose the dwelling on the new lot. No record or reason could be found why the the north part of Lot 22 was transferred to Lot 23. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan contains several policies regarding the subdivision of lots in.developed neighborhoods: 1) allow further subdivisions of developed single family lots only if neighborhood char- acter and symmetry are preserved, and 2) prohibit "neck Lot" subdivisions whereby access to public streets is gained through narrow strips of land adjacent to other lots. Staff believes that the location of the existing dwelling creates the illusion of subdivision potential for the property. If the dwelling would have been constructed where originally contemplated the illusion of subdivision potential would not exist. Although the existing dwelling is in an undesire- able location, the lot does presently comply with Ordinance standards. The pro- posed subdivision would create a substandard lot which would damage the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen submitted that although the lot is exceptionally large, its small frontage prevents the division of the property into two conforming lots. The additional property from Lot 22 does not contribute to the ability.to subdivide. Further, staff can find no evidence that this transfer was approved by the City. The proposed plat was considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of October 30, 1985 and recommended denial for the reasons set out in the staff report: 1) the sub- 11/18/85 division would create a neck lot contrary to policies contained in the Compre- hensive Plan, 2) the subdivision would create a substandard lot, and 3) the subdivision would disturb the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen commented that the proponent, Barbara Feiler, was not present. No public comment was heard.. Mr. Erickson advised that the usual procedure in matters like this is to authorize staff to prepare Findings of Fact for Council's review in making a decision. Member Bredesen then moved that the staff be directed to prepare Findings, Reasons and Decision for review by the Council at its meeting of December 2, 1985. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION INC. (6224 INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Developers Construction, Inc. Addition, advising that the subject property is generally located north of Interlachen Boulevard and east of Blake Road. It measures approximately 205 feet in width and 156 feet in depth and contains 31,300 square feet. The property is zoned R- 1.Single Dwelling District, and is developed with two single dwelling units. Since the Zoning Ordinance allows only one dwelling per lot in the R -1 zone the property is non - conforming. The subject property is bounded on the east and north by Interlachen Country Club. Single family dwelling are located to the immediate west and to the southeast across Interlachen Boulevard.. Mirror Lake is located directly to the south. Mr. Larsen stated that the proponents have submitted a preliminary plat which would create two buildable lots following the demolition of the existing dwell- ings. Lot 1 would be 105 feet in width and would contain 14,000 square feet. Lot 2 would measure 100 feet in width and contain 17,300 square feet. Both new lots would conform to Ordinance requirements. Also included in the plat is Outlot A which was detached from the subject property by Interlachen Boulevard. The marjority of the outlot is located within the lakebed of Mirror Lake. The existing dwellings are connected to sanitary sewer which runs through the Inter- lachen Club property to the north. However, the.units are not connected to public water but are served by a private well. The right of way for Interlachen Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property, is provided by an easement which is narrower than necessary for the existing roadway. The proposed plat would dedicate the required 66 foot wide right of way. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the right of way must be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. The pro- posed subdivision would eliminate the existing non - conforming condition and would provide two conforming lots. The site is relatively isolated from neigh- boring single family properties. It would seem to relate most to lots to the north and northwest and the proposed lot sizes are similar to lots in that neighborhood. The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the plat at its meeting of October 20, 1985 and recommended preliminary approval conditioned on: 1) execution of a developer's agreement for.the installation of public water service to the properties, 2).subdivision dedication, and 3) approval by Hennepin County of the proposed right of way. The Commission also discussed and recommended that one curb cut serve both properties. Mr. Larsen informed the Council that the proponent has met with Hennepin County and they have given preliminary approval on the location of the one-curb-cut. No comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the conditions in the staff report as outlined and the one curb cut: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR DEVELOPERS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that - certain plat entitled "Developers Construction, Inc. Addition ", platted by Developers Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 18, 1985, be and.is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. BID AWARDED FOR FOUR WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATED LOADER. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for one four wheel drive articulated loader, showing Ziegler, Inc. at $109,990.00 for Bid C (total cost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of $66,500.00 /5.years for a net bid of $42,290.00 and showing Case Power & Equip- ment at $81,213.00 for Bid C (total cost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of $58,500.00/5 years for a net bid of $23,213.00. The bid submitted by Minneapolis Equipment was incomplete and therefore was not considered. Mr. Rosland added that staff has reviewed the bids and would recommend award of bid to Ziegler, Inc. for the reasons outlined in the staff memorandum of November 15, 1985, which 11/18/85 pointed out that Case did not meet specifications on these items: cab mount, quick coupler, steering, hydraulic system and alternator. Scheduled mainte- nance costs were quoted at $2;821.98 for Caterpillar (Ziegler) vs. $5,817.50 for Case. Speaking in support of award of bid to Case were Gary Marshall, 5720 Susan Avenue, and Kevin Harrison, 4008 Grimes Avenue, an employee of Case. Both commented that they felt the specifications were written for one type of loader. In response, Mr. Hoffman pointed out that several other equipment dealers could have met the specifications but chose not to submit total cost bids. Following discussion, Member Turner moved award of bid to Ziegler, Inc. at total cost bid of $102,490.00 (net bid of $42,490.00) based on the reasons submitted by staff recommending purchase of the Caterpillar 950B Loader. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards. Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS FOR BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE. Mr. Rosland recalled that award of bids for the mechanical systems and the electrical work at Braemar Golf Course Club House had been continued from the last meeting. Tabulation of bids for plumbing, heating, ventilating, air conditioning and temperature control systems were presented showing Bowler Company, Inc. at $164,036, Hoov -Aire, Inc. at $173,343, All American Mechanical, Inc. at $186,265, General Sheetmetal at $178,505 and Vogt Heating at $185,543. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for mechanical systems to recommended low bidder,. Bowler Company, Inc. at $164,036. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Mr. Rosland reported that after reviewing the bids submitted for the electrical work it is recommended that all bids be rejected. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Turner to reject all bids submitted for the electrical work. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR COMPUTER /PRINTER REPLACEMENT SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE MANAGEMENT. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for replacement of the computer and printer system for vehicle management Public Works showing On -Line Computers (IBM -PC AT) at $6,075.00, On -Line Computers (Compag Deskpro 286) at $6,400.00 and Moore Business Systems at $6,863.00. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder, On -Line Computers (IBM -PC AT) at $6,075.00. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 1985, APPROVED. Mr. Hoffman summarized the action taken by the Traffic Safety Committee on November 12, 1985, regarding traffic concerns on Gleason Road, south of Valley View Road, which item was continued from the previous meeting. Reports showed that since January 1, 1983, there.have been eight accidents north of Valley View Road and four south of Valley View Road. Traffic counts show that Gleason Road is a collector roadway and a license plate survey identified greater than 50% of traffic being from the Edina area. Reports of speed surveys and a selected enforcement project for Gleason Road south of Valley View Road showed that of the 29 citations issued, 21 violators were found to live within one mile of .the intersection. The Committee identified the downhill geometrics as being the major problem and it was speculated that familiarity with the roadway might cause the majority of violations committed by local residents. Three options were suggested to correct the speed and safety concerns: 1) rigorous speed speed enforcement, 2) signs and warning devices including centerline barrier, and 3) redesign and re- engineering of the curved portion of the roadway. Regarding the request for a 3 -way "STOP" at the intersection of Gleason Road and Scotia Drive, Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the motion to recommend approval failed on a vote'of 2 -2. The Committee is reluctant to install unwarranted "STOP" signs to control speed and it was felt that "STOP" signs on steeply graded.',roadways can in and of themselves become hazardous. It was felt that the only possible warrant for a "STOP" sign might be the warrant of "special circumstances." Speaking in favor of installation of a "STOP" sign were Robert Miller, 6905 Gleason Road; Bill Hunchis, 7008 Gleason Road and Robert Remund, 6825 Gleason Road. Speaking in opposition to installation of a "STOP" sign was Don Ohlson, 7004 Gleason Road. It was also pointed out that the lack of sidewalks and the roadway's narrow width presents a hazard to pedestrians, especially school children. The main concern identified was vehicles out of control due.to speed. Mr. Hoffman commented. that :SnDot could be requested to conduct a speed study to see if the speed limit should be lowered, and that a letter to the neighborhood residents regarding these concerns may make them aware of the speeding problem. Member Kelly commented that she has been 11/18/85 concerned about the safety of the children who must use Gleason Road to walk to school because of the lack of sidewalks and that she felt the letters would help. Chief Swanson was asked to explain the warrant of "Special Circumstances." He clarified that in this case it would include, serious accident, high speed and restricted view. Mayor Courtney said he thought the Traffic Safety Committee should do more study on the problem and then bring a recommendation to the Council. help. Mayor Courtney said he thought the Traffic Safety Committee should do more study on the problem and then .bring a recommendation back to the Council. Member Bredesen said he felt the Council should resolve this now and that the "STOP" sign should be tried. Member Bredesen then made a motion which was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 12, 1985: 1) That "YIELD RIGHT OF WAY" signs be installed controlling northbound and southbound traffic on Kellogg Avenue, that 3 -way "STOP" signs be installed at the intersection of Gleason Road and Scotia Drive based on the warrant of "Special Circumstances ", and to acknow- ledge Section C of the Minutes. Member Richards said he could not support the motion because he felt the "STOP" sign would cause a greater problem but that he felt the letter should be sent out and then wait to see what happens until next Spring. Member Turner indicated she supported the letter going out now to make the neighbors aware of the problem, that the "STOP" sign not be installed until in the Spring, that we ask MnDot to conduct a study to get the speed limit lowered and that she would support moving up the construction of the sidewalks for Gleason Road in the Capital Improvement Program which now are scheduled for 1994. Member Bredesen then amended his motion to reflect Member Turner's comments and the amended motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards Motion-carried. 1986 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland presented a proposed schedule of 1986 holidays for City employees. He pointed that the inclusion of the observance of Martin Luther King's birthdate on the third Monday in January is a Federal /State mandated holiday and that in order to avoid an increase in the number of days that City Hall is closed, staff is proposing that the Goof Friday holiday be dropped from the schedule and that the number of holidays remain at 11. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner approving the following schedule of holidays for 1986: New Year's Day (January 1) Veterans' Day (November 11) Martin Luther King.Day (January 20) Thanksgiving Day (November 27) President's Day (February 17) Day after Thanksgiving Day (November 28) Memorial Day (May 26, 1986 Christmas Eve (December 24 - 1/2 day) Independence Day (July 4) Christmas Day (December 25) Labor Day (September 1) New Year's Eve (December 31 - 1/2 day) Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT PRESENTED. Bob Schoening, Chairman of the City Hall Space Study Committee, expressed the thanks of the Committee to the staff for their input in the Study. He then presented the Council with copies of the Study and then reviewed the outline of the Study which covered the following items: I. Analysis of Existing City Hall Facility, II. Estimation of Value of Existing City Hall Facility, III. Alternative Sites for New City Hall Facility, and IV. Summary of Recommendations and Conclusions. The recommendations were: 1) Hire a professional space planner to analyze the floor layout, integration of departments, storage and filing needs, etc., 2) Upon receiving space planner's recommendations, an estimate of expense to make the desired improvements (includ- ing an addition to the building) should be completed, 3) The use of modern tech- nology systems (i.e. record storage and microfilm, etc.) should be considered to reduce on site storage requirements, 4) A study should be conducted to analyze the vacation of Eden Avenue, and 5) The most viable alternative for relocation would be the Grandview Area. If the costs to improve and update the existing facility are greater than anticipated and the decision is made to vacate Eden Avenue, then the potential cost to relocate would be significantly reduced. In this event, a further analysis of the cost of the relocation to the Grandview area should be undertaken. Mr. Schoening concluded by commenting that the Study did not analyze the Public Works facility although the Committee did tour the facility and there are parts that need some improvement. He identified and thanked the members of the Committee consisting of David Sherman, Barb Foster, June Schmidt and Kathy Christensen for their input. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Courtney thanked the members of the Committee for their work on the Space Study. Following some discussion, Member Richards suggested that in regard to the specific recommendations in the Study that the Council should act on them after allowing time to study and review them. Member Richards then made a motion that this matter be placed on the Council Agenda for December 16, 1985. ll/18/85 Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen who stated that he hoped that by that date the Council would information from the space planners as to their recommendations with estimated costs and timeframes, etc. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 12, 1986 SET FOR BOARD OF REVIEW. As recommended by staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting May 12, 1986 at 5:00 p.m. as the hearing date for the Board of Review. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 1985 COUNCIL WORK PLAN PRESENTED. Mr. Rosland recalled that during the course of its Strategic Planning process, the City Council identified three key issues requiring study during 1986 and requested the staff to produce a work plan providing a program for addressing these issues. He added that the work plan has been drafted for the Council's review and suggested the matter be placed on the Council Agenda for December 2, 1985 for discussion. It was informally agreed that the Council would discuss the work plan on December 2, 1985. ADVISORY BOARD /COMMISSION ATTENDANCE DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that on several recent occasions some of the advisory boards and commissions have been unable to operate because there was no quorum in attendance. Ordinance No. 162 provides for the automatic removal of members of boards and commissions who fail to attend three consecutive meetings or who fail to attend any four meetings a year. Mr. Rosland asked for the Council's direction regarding this problem. Following some discussion, Member Richards made a motion to include Ordinance No. 162 when sending out the letters to board /commission members prior to the expiration of their terms as a.reminder of the attendance requirement and to also give this information to new candidates. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. SPECIAL MEETING ON ACCESSORY USES SCHEDULED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council Members of the Special Council Meeting scheduled for December 9, 1985 at 7 p.m. to discuss and study accessory uses regulated by ordinance. This will be an informational meeting open to the public and will be posted as such. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PROPOSED REVISED RULES DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised the Council that the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will hold a public hearing on Thursday, November 21, 1985, on proposed revised rules for the District and that Mr. Hoffman, City Engineer, will be attending. Mr. Hoffman explained that the Board is currently preparing a Water- shed Management Plan as required by Laws of Minnesota 1982', Chapter 509 and anticipates that it will be completed during 1985. Municipalities will then be required under Chapter 509 to prepare a municipal water management plan in conformity with the District's Plan. Where such a municipal plan is adopted the requirements of the District's rules which are met by the municipal plan shall be deemed satisfied upon a showing of compliance with the municipal plan. In such cases, individual site -by -site permits for developments in areas covered by a municipal plan will not be-required for those matters where the municipal plan satisfies these rules. Mr. Rosland said if the Council had any input re- garding the proposed revised rules that they should contact Mr..Hoffman prior to the hearing date. No action was taken. INFORMATION ON HOW NEW FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT LAW AFFECTS CITY REQUESTED.. Member Kelly asked that the Council be given information on how the new Fair Labor Standards Act law affects the City. Mr. Rosland responded that the pro visions of the law and their effect on the City will be summarized for the Council. LETTER REGARDING INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD NOTED. Member Kelly referred to an article in the Edina Sun - Current regarding Danny Berenberg's concerns for children's safety on Interlachen Boulevard and asked if the City is going to look into the matter. Mr. Hoffman responded that staff has been in contact with the County engineers and has reiterated the City's position about improving the roadway. He stated that he and Mr. Berenberg have met with the County in the past and that we are still looking for funds to construct pathways, walkways, and improvements to the roadway that would improve the safety for pedestrians. The County engineers are responding to the Board of Commissioners on this issue and staff is waiting for their answer. No action wag taken. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE ADOPTED FOR KATHERINE SEHLIN. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution of condolence on the recent death of Katherine Sehlin and moved its adoption: 11/18/85 RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE KATHERINE SEHLEN WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was a long time resident of the City of Edina and was active in civic and community affairs, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin served on the Youth Commission that was instrumental in the establishment of Edina High School, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin served as a member of the Human Relations Commission for seven years, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was greatly concerned for the quality of life of the aged, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was appointed and served on the Governor's Council on Aging, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin represented the State of Minnesota at the White House Conference on Aging in 1983, and WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was active on various Senior Citizens Boards in the metropolitan area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby extends its heartfelt sympathy to the family of KATHERINE A. SEHLIN during this time of bereavement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the pages of the Minutes Book of the City of Edina and that a copy be presented to her family. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner,_ Courtney Resolution adopted. STATUS OF BRUTGER DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONED. Member Kelly stated that she had received several.telephone inquiries about.the status of the Brutger Development on Cahill Road. Mr. Rosland responded that staff has heard nothing from Brutger and that an attempt will be made to ascertain what their plans for construction are. No action was taken. HOMART DEVELOPMENT SETTLEMENT DISCUSSED. Member Turner asked if the Council Members would get a final report on the settlement with Homart Development. Mr. Rosland said that the minutes of the Special Meeting held on November 13, 1985, would be on the next agenda for Council approval and would reflect the final settlement of the lawsuit. No action was taken. AMM STUDY OF METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE REVIEW PROCESS DISCUSSED. Member Turner reminded the Council that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) will be studying the Metropolitan Significance Review process which is conducted by the Metropolitan Council for proposed developments that will affect the metro area because they have had some concerns about the process in general. She asked if the Council wants to be part of the AM1l study, especially after the City's recent experience with the Homart Development. Member Richards said he felt the Council should offer it's comments on the process and suggested it be discussed at the next meeting. EDINBOROUGH "GROUNDBREAKING" RECEPTION NOTED. Mayor Courtney stated that he was very pleased with the Edinborough "Groundbreaking" reception held on November 15. Member Richards commented that the developers have had 2,000 serious inquiries over the weekend regarding the housing element of the project. No action was taken. MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 20. Mr. Rosland said that the Municipal Legislative Commission is scheduled to meet on November 20, 1985, and that he and Member Richards will be attending to represent Edina. EDINA SUN - CURRENT CENTERFOLD DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland reported that he has received a cost estimate of..$700 for printing of an "Edina Centerfold" in.the Edina Sun - Current and that he has discussed with the Edina Rotary their sponsoring of the first two issues. It is hoped that other organizations will volunteer to sponsor future issues. The first issue is scheduled for February, 1986. Mr. Rosland said the regular Edina Newsletter would still be sent in January with the homestead application mailing and that if the centerfold is well received we might consider discontinuing the newsletter in the future. No action was taken. PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHT REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Upon being advised that a petition has been received for installation of an ornamental street light at the intersection of Chowen Avenue and Chowen Curve, Member Richard's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to accept the petition and to refer it to the Engineering Department for processing. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 11/18/85 1986 LABORATORY SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY APPROVED. Mr. Rosland explained that Hennepin County will be contracting with the Minneapolis Health Department and the City of Edina for laboratory service in 1986. This change occurred because the City could not handle the increased volume of food samples which were submitted for analysis last summer. He pointed out that the contract with Hennepin County will be for a total cost not to exceed $3,500.00 for 1986. This contract is $6,500.00 less than the 1985 contract and will primarily provide residential well water testing services for County residents. Staff would recommend approval of the contract for 1986 with the belief that the reduced laboratory service demand is in the best interest of the City of Edina. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to enter into Contract No. 60107 with the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, whereby the County, through its Community Health Department, agrees to make payments to the City of Edina for analytical and microbiological laboratory support services, for the term from January 1, 1986 through December 31, 1986, not to exceed $3,500.00. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE /THANKS ADOPTED FOR GIFT OF LAND BY JESSIE BONN. Mr. Rosland recommended that a resolution of acceptance and thanks be adopted for the gift of land by Mrs. Jessie Bonn. Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE AND THANKS OF GIFT WHEREAS, Mrs.-Jessie D. Bonn has offered to give to the City of Edina a portion of her property; and WHEREAS, acceptance of this gift is in the best interest of Edina and will further the general welfare of its citizens; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Edina accepts the generous gift of land from Mrs. Jessie D. Bonn described as follows: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of IDYLWOOD THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed bearing of East, along the north line of- IDYLWOOD SECOND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, a distance of 187.10 feet to the west line of CARSON' HILL; thence North 0 degrees 21 minutes 55 seconds East, along said west line, a distance of 224.03 feet; thence North 89 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 57.66 feet; thence South 0 degrees 57 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 62.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence North 10 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 72.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 90.14 feet to the east line of said IDYLWOOD THIRD ADDITION; thence South 0 degrees 28 minutes 05 seconds West, along said east line, a distance of 246.84 feet to the point of beginning. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Council, on behalf of all the citizens of Edina hereby express its sincere thanks to Mrs. Jessie D. Bonn. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for payment of the following claims dated 11/18/85: General Fund $365,809.02, Art Center $2,409.92, Swimming Pool Fund $86.75, Golf Course Fund $118,737.54, Recreation Center Fund $1,809.99, Gun Range Fund $339.36, Utility Fund $383,423.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $77,665.66, Construction Fund $189,999.17, Total $1,140,361.87; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 10/31/85: General Fund $134,950.23, Park Department $186.63, Art Center $500.07, Swimming Pool Fund $3,469.96, Golf Course Fund $7,278.74, Recreation Center Fund $6,067.39, Gun Range Fund $421.67, Utility Fund $24,857.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $223,423.43, Total $401,155.12. Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. City Clerk -..., MINUTES OF SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 13, 1985 The Edina City Council met in special session on November 13, 1985 at four o'clock p.m. in the offices of Mr. Frederick S'. Richards, at 4344 IDS Tower, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Council members in attendance were Leslie Turner, Peggy Kelly, Fred Richards and C. Wayne Courtney. Also in attendance were Ken Rosland, Fran Hoffman, Becky Comstock from Dorsey & Whitney, and Tom Erickson, City Attorney, also from Dorsey & Whitney. The meeting was called to discuss possible settlement of the lawsuit against Homart and of the Metropolitan Significance Review instituted by Edina in connection with the Homart Project. The Mayor opened the meeting and then asked Tom Erickson to present the current status of settlement negotiations. Mr. Erickson advised as follows: 1.. The agreement presented to the City Council on November 12, 1985 was substantially the same as now negotiated except for the following changes: (a) Paragraph 4 has been changed to provide that Homart's share of the cost of the turn lane shall not exceed $40,000 and that the construction of the turn lane shall include signalization. (b) In Paragraph 9 the square footage in the first three Phases is now stated to be "gross floor area." (c) Paragraph 11 relative to the I -494 corridor study to be undertaken by the Metropolitan Council now also provides that the study "shall include, among other aspects, transportation improvements, mass transit useage and land useage." (d) There are also a number of other insignificant nonsubstantive changes in the language of the agreement. 2. There were three open issues: (1) to date Edina has insisted that the agreement relative to the restriction on construction of Phase IV (restricted by the vehicle trips) should be of record, and thereby give notice to owners of Phase IV. Homart has objected to that recording. As an alternate, Edina has suggested that Bloomington adopt a zoning and /or land use ordinance implementing the provisions of the Settlement Agreement; that Bloomington also agree - i -- to give notice to Edina of development plans for the Homart site and not to approve any development plan or issue building permits, except for Phase I, until the ordinance is effective. Peter Coyle has advised us that Homart had approved this concept and that Floyd Olson, city attorney, had approved the concept, although neither had seen the exact language that we proposed. Mr. Erickson asked for some direction of Council as to whether they would accept the zoning ordinance and remove any requirement that the agreements with Homart be recorded. 3. The Settlement Agreement presently requires that Bloomington initiate the traffic study by notice to Metropolitan Council, and Metropolitan Council would then see to the selection of a group of experts who would prepare criteria, and those criteria would be used to complete the traffic study after Phases I, II and III were complete and occupied; on the basis of that study the Metropolittan Council would determine the size of Phase IV. Homart wants to put a time frame of 120 days or 180 days (the 180 -day figure being our number) on this process so that Homart will be. able to plan. We advised the Council that we had no objection to the 180 or the 120 days so long as the parties to the Agreement retain their rights and obligations notwithstanding failure to comply with that deadline. 4. Mr. Erickson advised the City Council that, based upon the direction given by the Council at the November 12 meeting, he asked Homart to pay the City Attorney's fees and costs in the amount of $75,000. He advised that Homart had refused. He then advised that he had not yet asked the City of Bloomington to pay any of these costs. He has not done so for fear that such a discussion, even if payment of the cost was framed in terms of purchase of the north half of the right -of -way of 77th Street, or especially if such request was framed as a purchase of the right -of -way, would lead to a request on the part of Bloomington for payment by Edina of one -half the cost of 77th Street plus 100% of the cost of the sewer to be installed with that street. Therefore, he thought it best not to raise this issue at this time, but should the issue come up in the future when Bloomington decides to put in the road, Edina can always request that Bloomington pay some part of its costs involved in this matter in exchange for Edina agreeing to take on some part of the cost of construction of the road and /or sewer which in turn could be assessed by Edina against the benefitted property owners (assuming, of course, a Joint Powers Agreement or other activity on.the part of Edina is taken in timely fashion so that the assessment can be made). Mr. Erickson also advised that they had done some research, and the research indicated that Edina was in a - ii - favorable position to prevent any road construction by Bloomington which did not include an accommodation of the drainage, either by an open swale or by a pipe. After presentation by Mr. Erickson, the Council members asked a number of questions and made a number of comments on the Settlement Agreement. Thereafter motion was made by Turner, and seconded by Richards, that (i) the Settlement Agreement presented on November 12, 1985, with the changes mentioned by Mr. Erickson, including the additional nonsubstantive changes negotiated by the attorneys, and including deletion of a recording requirement, and insertion in lieu thereof of the Bloomington ordinance provisions, and the insertion of a 120 -day study period for the traffic study, provided that the parties do not lose their rights and obligations should the study take longer than 120 days, be approved, (ii) the City Attorney not seek any repayment of attorneys' fees at this time in connection with the Settlement Agreement, and (iii) the Mayor and Manager are authorized to execute that Agreement with such additional changes and modifications as the Mayor and the Manager may deem appropriate, and the signature of the Mayor and the Manager shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of this Council to the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement as signed. The Mayor then called for the question, and the Resolution was adopted 3 to 1, with Mr. Richards, Ms. Turner and Mr. Courtney voting aye, and Ms. Kelly voting nay. There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was thereupon adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager - iii - I CITY OF EDINA In the Matter of the Application of FINDINGS, Barbara Feiler for a Subdivision of DECISIONS, Lot 23 and the north 103.5 feet AND of Lot 22, Edina Highlands (S- 85 -10) REASONS The above entitled matter was heard before the City Council on November 18, and December 2, 1985. Barbara Feiler ( "Proponent ") was not present. The City Council, having heard and reviewed all of the facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, City staff and property owners in the vicinity of the subject subdivision, and having heard and reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent, City staff, and property owners, and being fully advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The Proponent, on September 24, 1985, submitted an application for subdivision (the "Proposed Subdivision ") of a 66,450 square foot parcel of land located at the northeasterly end of the cul -de -sac in Duncraig Road. This tract of land (the "Subject Property ") is platted property (Platted in 1946), and is described as Lot 23, Block 1, Edina Highlands, and the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Block 1, Edina Highlands. An existing single dwelling unit building is located in the north central portion of the Subject Property. According to City records the Subject Property is owned by Barbara Feiler. 2. The Proposed Subdivision delineated two, R -1, single dwelling unit lots. Lot 1 of the Proposed I Subdivision, the lot which would include the existing dwelling unit building, measured 35,698 square feet and Lot 2, the proposed new building site, measured 30,625 square feet. These measurements are approximate since a boundary survey by a registered land surveyor was not submitted with the application for subdivision. 3. The Edina Community Development and Planning Commission (the "Commission ") reviewed the Proposed Subdivision at its October 30, 1985 meeting. Several property owners from the vicinity of the Subject Property were present, and two of the residents spoke in opposition to the Proposed Subdivision citing issues of compatibility with adjacent lots, terrain, decreased property value, the character of the neighborhood, and existing deed restrictions applicable to lots in the Edina Highlands plat. The Proponent submitted that the new dwelling unit would be built in the woods and would be screened by dense vegetation from surrounding properties. The Commission voted to recommend denial of the Proposed Subdivision for the following reasons: - The Proposed Subdivision would create a neck lot contrary to policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. - The Proposed Subdivision would create a substandard lot. . s - The Proposed Subdivision would disturb the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. 4. Edina Ordinance No. 825,( the "Zoning Ordinance ") imposes the following minimum standards for single dwelling unit lots: Minimum Lot Area - 9,000 Square feet Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feet The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot Width" as follows: "The horizontal distance between side lot lines measured at right angles to the line establishing the lot depth at a point 50 feet from the front lot line." The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot depth" as follows: "The horizontal distance between the midpoint of the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line." Lot 2, the new lot, of the Proposed Subdivision would comply with the above standards. Lot 1, the lot for the existing dwelling, would not comply with the standard for lot width. Lot 1 would provide a lot width of approximately 22 feet. 5. The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot" as follows: S "The basic development unit for purposes of this ordinance. A lot may consist of one parcel or two or more adjoining parcels under single ownership or control, and used for a principal use and accessory uses allowed by this ordinance. A lot, except lots in a townhouse plat, must have at least 30 feet frontage on a street other than a limited access freeway." Lot 1, the lot for the existing dwelling, would have a frontage on the street of approximately 12 feet. 6. Edina ordinance No. 801, ( the "Platting Ordinance ") states that the City Council, in approving plats, shall consider, among other things, the suitability of plats from the standpoint of community planning. 7. The Edina Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City Council on December 12, 1981, states the following general policies: Allow further subdivision of developed single family lots only if the neighborhood character and symmetry are preserved. - Prohibit "neck lot" subdivisions whereby access to public streets is gained through narrow strips of land adjacent to other lots. I - Require increased minimum lot sizes for single family and two family dwelling lots with steep slopes. 8. The Zoning Ordinance provides for variances from the requirements of the Ordinance, but only upon finding, among other required findings, that the "plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to his property which were not created by the petitioner,... and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and intent of this ordinance." 9. The subject property exhibits areas with slopes exceeding 30 percent. 10. Divisions of property must receive approval by resolution of the City Council. There exists no record indicating the approval of the addition of the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22 to Lot 23 of Edina Highlands. THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing findings, the City Council does hereby make the following: mne- i c i nn The application for the Proposed Subdivision by Barbara Feiler of Lot 23 and the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Edina Highlands is hereby denied. The above decision is made for the following: I n -- --"n - A. The Proposed Subdivision is contrary to policies of the Comprehensive Plan concerning the further subdivision of lots within developed single family neighborhoods. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan must be considered in deciding whether or not to approve Subdivisions. B. Property owners in the vicinity of the Subject Property should have the right to rely upon the recorded plat entitled Edina Highlands and should rightly presume that any modification or replatting of said plat will be compatible with surrounding properties and that the spaciousness and character of the Edina Highlands neighborhood will be preserved. C. Lot 1, the lot for the existing dwelling, would require a variance for lot width and would require a variance from the requirement that lots have a frontage of at least 30 feet on a street. The need for variances is solely created by the Petitioner's request for approval of the Proposed Subdivision, and therefore, does not meet the criteria established by the Zoning Ordinance for the granting of variances; but approval of the Proposed Subdivision would be implied approval of the variances. D. Although the lots in the Proposed Subdivision are similar in size to some lots in the vicinity, other factors, including the unusual shape of the lots, the presence of steep slopes, and the location of the existing dwelling prevent development of Lot 2 without adversly impairing the character and symmetry of the neighborhood. E. The addition of the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Edina Highlands to the Subject Property does not materially add to the ability to subdivide-the Subject Property since it presently serves as a visual rear yard for two existing dwelling unit buildings, and should not be considered part of the Subject Property since the division adding this property to lot 23 was not approved by the City. F. Approval of the Proposed establish a precedent encouraging large lots with similar facts and adversely alter the character and neighborhood contrary to the poli Plan. Subdivision could the replatting of other circumstances which would symmetry of the cies of the Comprehensive 0. s ff'R CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on December 2, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easement for utility purposes: Utility easement shown in the plat for Meadow Lane II Addition on that part of Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition lying westerly and southwesterly of the centerline of York Avenue South. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above .proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter ,upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella If. Daehn City Clerk tZOINaOROUGH ADDITION W, 'o A 0 01. 3 '2 2 % nf L M c,� I 7r. 77, 43 = 55'0 BL"C'N I "T i 0. z is 2692e\6 166 VL RT DOG ;1 C.Ck, R DO!, Na-_ SP ?a TH, —,g---fi6G26 • WI M, IE ST 'o A 0 01. 3 '2 2 % nf L M c,� I 7r. 77, 43 = 55'0 BL"C'N I "T i 0. z is 2692e\6 166 VL EEL 3 OF 3 SHEETS SHEET 2 Of 3 SHEETS Wol ED'NBOROUG"- ADDITION OF Eo:r.A ?a TH, —,g---fi6G26 • WI M, IE ST sr 76 TH. sr. 2 WEST 2 - r ---------- F 21, • 2 r ---------------- 31. 0 i% T 10 01 p 4 ZlI 1, EEL 3 OF 3 SHEETS SHEET 2 Of 3 SHEETS Wol ai.Z A TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works IIA: Kenneth Rosland, City flanaver SUBJECT: REgUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 28, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Snow P1ow'Cutting Edges* (Hennepin County Bid)-. Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or aid 1• Paper Calmenson $5;453.47 2. 3. Department P.ecormendation: Paper,Calmenson $5,453.47 • ubl-ic Works - Street Sign Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. Ltj a&Q J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City naner's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recorrnendation of the Department and reconunend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: _ Kenneth Rosland,pity Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: �M.ayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Edina Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 27, 1985 Material Description (General Specifications): Remodeling of Art Center basement restroom to wheel chair and handicap use Quotations /Bids: Company �. Peak Construction Co. 6103 Arctic Way, Edina, MN 55436 2. Crawford -Marz Const. Co. 2316 Fourth Ave. S.,.Mpls., Mn 55404 '. Lars Hassel Const. Department Recommendation: Peak Construction Co. Finance Director's Endorsemer The recon�riended bi d i s y-3 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 8,675. $ 8,900 $ 9,000 Department is not within the amount budget for the purchase. ector City naaer's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nnetn Hosland, City Manager i k M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland DATE: November 25, 1985 FROM: Craig G. Swanson SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License The. on -sale wine license application of the below establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable Statutes and ordinances: Empress Restaurant 3335 Hazelton Rd. Edina, MN 55435 The findings of these investigations do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Therefore, I recommend the, :Council move to approve the application and issuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon approval by the State of minnesota. And, instruct the City Clerk to forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their approval. CRAIG G SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M DATE: November 19, 1985 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Colleen Paulus, Sanitarian SUBJECT: Approval of Wine Application The Empress Restaurant located at 3335 Hazelton,Road has been approved for the service of wine by the Edina Health Department. The establishment was evaluated foi adequate storage space for wine, glassware storage and the method of dispensing. j'A qk jpp =- B M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE PROCESS DATE: November 27, 1985 The City Council plans to discuss the subject process on December 2, 1985, with respect to Edina's recent experience with Homart. This memo will summarize the process and, in staff's view, how it worked for Homart. Summary of Process The following summary is excerpted from a June 28, 1985, letter from Mr. Erickson and Ms. Comstock. Metropolitan Significance Review Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.173, the Metropolitan Council may make a determination that the Homart Project is a matter of metropolitan significance and suspend the commencement of construction for up to one year. Under Minnesota Rules Chapter 5700, a metropolitan significance review may be initiated by resolution of the local unit of government which is affected by a proposed project, in this case the City of Edina. Information accompanying the resolution must indicate why the project is deemed to be of metropolitan significance and its effect on existing or planned land uses or development of the initiator. The Chairman of the Metropolitan Council will commence the review effective upon the receipt of the resolution if it is determined that the request complies with the metropolitan significance review requirements, is not in bad faith, presents arguable claims, and is not exempt. The review period for metropolitan significance begins to run from the effective date of the order issued by the Metropolitan Council and terminates automatically on the 90th day thereafter, unless the period has been suspended to allow the decision of another public agency which is required by law to review the matter. The Metropolitan Council Chairman will appoint a review committee of three to seven members of the council, who may delegate their responsibilities for portions of the review to a hearing examiner on their own initiative, or following the request of any party. If the review is being conducted by a hearing examiner, the proceeding will be in the nature of a contested case and discovery will be available to the parties. November 27, 1985 Kenneth Rosland Page Two If Bloomington has adopted a local comprehensive plan which has been approved by the Metropolitan Council under the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, the project will be determined to be of metropolitan significance only if among other things, it has a substantial effect.on existing or planned land use or development within a local governmental unit other than the situs unit or the proposed matter is inconsistent with those elements of the local comprehensive plan which are subject to Council modification under the Act and would result in the utilization, extension or expansion of a metropolitan system plan in conflict with any metropolitan system plan or part thereof. Following a public hearing, the review committee adopts a committee report setting forth its findings and recommendations. The Council makes a final determination and if it finds a matter to be of metropolitan significance, may: (1) include a determination as to whether the procedure to amend a metropolitan system plan should be instituted.to ensure consistency with the proposed matter; and /or (2) issue an order suspending commencement of construction for up to one-year, identifying conditions or modifications to the project which would cause the Council to eliminate the suspension; or (3) find the matter to be of metropolitan significance but inappropriate for suspension or amendment. The final determination of the Metropolitan Council, including the decision of the Council not to commence metropolitan significance review, constitutes a final decision of the Council for purposes of judicial review. The City of Edina could seek judicial review of the final decision of the Metropolitan Council. Homart Experience Edina's request to initiate a metropolitan significance review was accepted by the Chair of the Metropolitan Council (the "Council ") who, thereupon, commenced a review on October 3, 1985. A calendar was issued to.all parties for this review which scheduled various meetings and hearings to be conducted during the 90 -day review period. Shortly after commencement of the.review, Homart requested that the Council consider their project as a "phased" project and then exempt Phase I on the basis that it did not exceed the thresholds mandating in a metropolitan significance review. After the receipt of Homart's request, the Council's staff and the significance review committee immediately focused on the so- called seg- mentation issue and scheduled hearings to consider exempting Phase I of the project. Although our settlement agreement pre - empted the segmentation decision, we believe that the review committee would have decided in Homart's favor. Analysis In my view, the Council's decision to consider the segmentation and exemption issue was untimely and without foundation. The decision had the effect of putting Edina on the defensive and requiring us to justify our petition which November 27, 1985 Kenneth Rosland Page Three already had been accepted. Even if the Council's decision to segment this issue was justified,-then that decision should have been considered at the conclusion of the 90 -day review period rather than at the beginning. In retrospect, the Council should have, perhaps, scrutinized our petition more closely prior to commencing the review. Even though we felt our petition was justified, the process would have been better served if the basic decision concerning segmentation was made before the review was commenced. Issues that the A. M. M. may wish to consider are the thresholds which must be exceeded to commence a review and the powers that the Council has upon finding that a development is of metropolitan significance. As to the latter, the Council is not empowered to mandate change in a project; it can, at most, delay a project for one year. This is a very powerful tool that would likely have the effect of causing modifications in the project. However, the Council is reluctant to use this authority; e.g. the Council has already indicated that they will not delay the megamall, even before the hearings are concluded. In my view, the published rules of the metropolitan significance review process are understandable and fairly reasonable. The Council, however, has-to come to grips with its role in the process. The Council is too interested in performing a mediation function rather than a fact finding function that results in an independent analysis and judgment. GH /sw Icity of Bloomington, minnesota Municipal Building • 2215 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 -9971 • (612) 881 -5811 November 25, 1985 The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Enclosed for your information is a copy of Resolution No. 85 -229, which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Bloomington on November 18, 1985. This Resolution directs City of Bloomington staff to review the impacts of development and proposed development in the City of Minneapolis upon the metropolitan region. If you have any questions regarding this Resolution, please do not hesitate to contact our office. E. L. Woulfe, CMC City Clerk cr Enclosure AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: (612) 887 -9677 j!% ;i► RESOLUTION NO. 85 - 229 A RESOLUTION DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO REVIEW THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS UPON THE METROPOLITAN REGION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bloomington is the official governing body of the City of Bloomington; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.1731, as amended, the Metropolitan Council has adopted and put into effect regulations establishing standards, guidelines, and procedures for determining whether any proposed matter is of metropolitan significance; and WHEREAS, the legislative policy embodied in the regulations, as stated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.173, Subd. 29 "shall be to promote the orderly and economic development, public and private of the metropolitan area" and to provide project reviews to ascertain the impacts and relationship to policy statement goals and policy plans of the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, metropolitan significance review includes, among other things, examination of systems related to transportation, sewers, airports, housing and economic and fiscal analyses of the proposed projects; and WHEREAS, more than 14 million square feet of private office space have been developed in downtown Minneapolis; in addition, nearly 1.5 million square feet of new and renovated office space is currently under construction in Minneapolis' central business district, including Lincoln Center (to be built in two 685,000 square foot phases), the International Centre Phase I and II (which will contain 5801000 square feet), International Center Phase III, Radisson Plaza 7 (which will include 330,000 square feet of office space in a mixed -use development also containing a 354 room Radisson Hotel and retail space), and Century Plaza (a 1 conversion project which will include 260',000 square feet of office space); and WHEREAS, other proposed projects include Cowles Media Printing Plant (a two phase 350,000 square foot industrial plant), Norwest Center (consisting of approximately 1.53 million square feet), MCC II (consisting of 1.28 million square feet of office and retail space), Northwestern National Life Insurance office building (consisting of approximately 500,000 square feet), and additional retail estimated to be approximately 800,000 square feet; and WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis proposes a Convention Center complex of approximately 1.67 million square feet, including a new convention center hotel; and WHEREAS, the La Societe Generale Immobilier (LSGI) has proposed a 1,000,000 square foot shopping complex; and WHEREAS, while approximately 5,000,000 square feet of new development is proposed within the City of Minneapolis, it has not produced a coordinated evaluation of such development and its cummulative impacts upon the region; and WHEREAS, regional highway and sewer facilities serving this proposed development are already over capacity or operating in non - compliance with federal law; and WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has been and will continue to be impacted on Interstate I -35W by continued over -use and congestion at all bridges and intersections within the City of Bloomington; and WHEREAS, it is not known what effects increased concentration of development within the City of Minneapolis may have upon the regional sewer system, airports, housing and retail sales throughout the Metropolitan Area; and WHEREAS, metropolitan significance review should oe commenced to ascertain how concentrated Minneapolis plans to develop its central business district, to ascertain what impacts such plans will have on all surrounding cities and regional systems since the Minneapolis Zoning Ordinance does not appear to limit 2 _. • 1 . the intensity of development in downtown Minneapolis; and WHEREAS, it appears to the City of Bloomington that a phenomenon is occurring which can be characterized as the over - concentration of development in the central business district of downtown Minneapolis; and WHEREAS, no current evaluation has been prepared to demonstrate what mitigating factors and limitations should be utilized to prevent further adverse impacts upon the vitality and development of the cities and counties surrounding the City of Minneapolis. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the staff of the City of Bloomington is directed to review and prepare analyses-for the purpose of considering initiation of a metropolitan significance review of the cummulative effects of the over- building of the Minneapolis central business district in the City of Bloomington; and The City Manager of the City of Bloomington is authorized to enter into such arrangements and contracts with cities and counties for the purpose of reviewing and preparing studies, reports and analyses to determine the regional impacts upon metropolitan systems, and to take such other and further measures as are necessary to alleviate the adverse impacts such over - building in the City of Minneapolis may have upon the City of Bloomington. Passed and adopted this 18th day of November , 1985. ATTEST: Secretary to the Council Fj yo i'r w V- November 25, 1985 TO: Mayor and City Council 1�7 FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer! VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: County Road 18 East Ramp /Londonderry Road Intersection Traffic Signals Attached are the resolutions necessary for plan approval and agreement for par- ticipation in construction of traffic signals at the above listed location. The estimated city participation is $34,200.00 with $17,100.00 being a regular state aid funding; $17,100.00 being also a state aid funding with a resolution necessary to expend it on the County Road system. Hennepin County will fund $34,200.00 as is their normal participation at freeway ramps. Staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions and an additional resolution to expend an estimated $17,100.00 on the County Road system from our Municipal State Aid Funding. FJH:1m r r+ -w O HENNEPIN Ll U DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South __ Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 �'NES 935 -3381 TTY 935 -6433 November 14, 1985 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota, 55424 CSAH 18 AT LaMONDERRY DRIVE COUNTY PROJECT 8420 Dear Mr. Hoffman: Submitted are one set of plans, two copies of an agreement, and a sample copy of a resolution approving plans for the above referenced traffic signal project, for which arrangements are being made to call for bids. If the agreement is satisfactory, please have both copies signed by the appropriate city officials and return them to this office. Upon completion of the remaining signatures by County officials, we will send you one fully executed copy for your files. Also, ulease return_a _ certified copy of the resolution authorizing the mayor and manager to " sigma le agree. A resolution approving plans must be passed by your City Council prior receipt of bids. We will be happy to review the plans or the agreement with you if you have any questions. We are hoping to receive bids on this project prior to January 1, 1986" and your early attention will be appreciated. Sincerely, Theodore J. H , P.E. Chief Design Engineer WGM =mak HENNEPIN COUNTY Enclosure an equal opportunity employer ti At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8420 showing proposed traffic control signal installation at County State Aid Highway No. 18 and Londonderry Drive, within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City. NOW, MEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this day of State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina , 19 . I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the day of , 19 , as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. (SEAL) City Clerk At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, the following resolution was moved and adopted: D T7 CAT TTT T AW7 WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8420 showing proposed traffic control signal installation at County State Aid Highway No. 18 and Londonderry Drive, within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project, have been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things approved. Dated this 2nd day of.December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. City Clerk 1 RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that is hereby approves the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement now existing and entered into between the Cities of Edina, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Richfield and Hopkins, Minnesota, to create the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and authorized to execute the First Amendment for the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. City Clerk RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Agreement for participation 'in the construction and operation of traffic control signal system on.County State Aid Highway No. 18 at Londonderry Drive, Hennepin County Project No. 8420, Agreement No. PW 26 -11 -85 _has been _prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS'RESOLVED, that said Agreement be in a111:"things approved. 7 r BE -IT'FURTHER- RE SOL_ VED, 'than the'-Mayor and'Manager are authorized to sign Agreement No. 26-11-85, H nnepin -- County=- Project No-: °8420. ° ADOP-TED.this.2nd dayof December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of December, 1985, as disclosed by the :records of said City in my possession. City Clerk RESOLUTION APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS TO. C.S.A.H. PROJECT WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisible and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 18 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways and identified in its records as 27- 618 -54, M.S.A.P. 142 - 128 -05, M.S.A.P. 120 - 161 -02, 120 - 020 -18; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $17,100,00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authorization. ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession. City Clerk DATE: November 1, 1985 �P1N C TO: All Commissioners r % HEPIN FROM: Kay Mitchell, Clerk of the Board ,'� N.E 9� P SUBJECT:MEMBER AT LARGE APPOINTMENTS - 1986 As required under Resolution No. 77 -2 -126 and 77- 2 -126R and amended under Resolution 80 -6 -571, attached is the annual list of all Member -at -Large appointments that are due to expire in 1986. jc Attach: cc: Ted Farrington Dale Ackmann Chuck Sprafka Bob Rohl f Jim Kemp Mel Si®e1, Sec. Water Resources Fred Richards, Attorney - Watershed Districts Sue Zuidema Phil Eckhert Various Municipalities Tom Johnson 1 1986 SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS MEMBERS AT LARGE TERM COMMITTEE /BOARD INCUMBENTS LENGTH ENDING ------------------------------------------ OF TERM JANUARY CORRECTIONS ADVISORY BOARD Sig Fine 2 1/2/86 years Tom Lavelle Bruce Sabatke Mary Jo Reiter Dan Cain Gerald Kaplan Joanna Buzek Raymond Skinaway JANUARY 1/2/86 PERSONNEL BOARD W. William Bednarczyk 4 years Gene Neuman JANUARY 1/31/86 LIBRARY BOARD Eris Lundin Young 3 years David Scott Benton Raymond O'Connell FEBRUARY MENTAL COMMITMENT ATTORNEY Thonmas Tinkham 2 years 2/28/86 PA14EL ADVISORY BOARD Susan Lentz Wallace Salovich Sharon Burkhardt Vacant MARCH MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED Camille Andre 3 years 3/8/86 DISTRICT BOARD Jim McWethy MARCH 3/22/86 LOWER MN RIVER WATERSHED DISTRICT Russell Sorenson 3 years BOARD JULY RILEY PURGATORY -BLUFF CREEK Frederick Rahr 3 years 7/30/86 WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD AUGUST COMMUNITY ACTION FOR SUBURBAN Donald Genereau 1 year 8/20/86 HENNEPIN BOARD (CASH) Gloria Johnson John Hamilton Vacant Mary Leintz Dan Ryerson SEPTEMBER 9/29/86 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Aileen Kulak 3 years BOARD Helen McClelland DECEMBER 12/31/86 AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION C'TEE Clarissa Walker 3 years J.. Albert Oster 6 w HERBST & THUE, LTD. J M E M O R A N D U M TO: Chairman Miller Southwest Operating Committee FROM: Gary R. Matz DATE: November 15, 1985 RE: Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement Attached hereto please find an amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement as recommended by the full Commission. An amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement must be approved by all five member cities. The Agreement provides that an executed copy of the amendment together with a certified copy of the authorizing resolution be filed with the chairman of the Commission. GRM:cr Enc. FIRST AMENDMENT TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT This First Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement, made and entered into this day of 198 , by and between the CITIES OF EDINA, EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNETONKA, RICHFIELD and HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, constitutes the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement now existing and entered into by each of the above Cities to create the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; and this First Amendment is made to record the agreements by each of the Member Cities and in consideration of the mutual promises of each of the Member Cities: 1. Article XI, Financial Matters, Section 4, Contribution for Subsequent Years is amended to read as follows: Section 4. Contribution for Subsequent Years. Beginning in the calendar year 1986 and for each year thereafter, each Party shall contribute Two Thousand Five Hundred s contributions an amount which bears the same ratio to the total budget as that Party's franchise fees received for the period ending August 31 of the year prior to the year for which such budget has been prepared bears to the total franchise fees received for such prior period by all of the Parties combined, or such other amount or ratio as is agreed to by all of.the Directors by August 1 of the year prior to the year for which such budget has been prepared and approved by the Council of each Party. However, in any event, no Party's contribution shall exceed the franchise fees received in such prior year by such Party. - 1 - 2. The Cities hereby expressly agree that all of the other terms and conditions of said Joint and Cooperative Agreement remain in full force and effect and are not affected by the terms and conditions of this First Amendment except as explicitly provided herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cities hereto have caused this First Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement to be duly executed the date first above written. CITY OF MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA By Its: By Its: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its: By Its: - 2 - I:AEH:SW6 CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA By Its• By Its: CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA By Its: By Its: CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA By Its: By Its: - 3 - RT?.g0T.77TT0N BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby approves the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement now existing and entered into between the Cities of Edina, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Richfield and Hopkins, Minnesota, to create the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and authorized to execute the First Amendment for the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of December, 1985. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk :. THOMSEN,NYBECK,JOHNSON,BOUQUET 61 VAN VALKEN BURG, F.A. LAW OFFICES SUITE 102 7250 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH _jjt�-- A GLENN G.NYSECK MINNEAPOLIS IEDINAI,MINNESOTA 66433 OF COUNSEL GORDON V.JOHNSON 10121 835 -7000 HELGE THOMSEN JOHN K. BOUOUET RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A. JAMES VAN VALKENBURG JACK W.CARLSON MARK G.OHNSTAD STEVEN J.OUAM DONALD D. SMITH ROBERT E.2ECK DENNIS M. PATRICK MARSH J. HALBERG November 13, 1985 MARK E. LASES JOHN R. PRAETORIUS Mr. George Hite, Chair Edina School Board 4720 Aspasia Circle Edina, Minnesota 55435 Gentlemen: Mayor C. Wayne Courtney, City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Sometime earlier this year your respective Boards approved the Resolution that I am enclosing in concept. Glenn Smith and I have now gone over the Resolution and have put it into language that I think is acceptable to each of you and I should advise you that it is to the Foundation. The purpose and intent is stated in the first part of the Resolution and the specific language in the second part. There is some language there that has been carried forward referring to the various Sections of Internal Revenue Code from the original document and beyond that we have attempted to shorten and simplify the same. I wish you would take it before your respective Boards and advise me as to the date of approval by your respective Boards so that we can put this matter away as a completed item. My records indicate that the School District approved this at their meeting of July 8, 1985 (Volume 57, Report 17) and I do not have the exact date of the City Council's approval and do not know as they passed a specific Resolution as I appeared before the Council to obtain that okay. Regards to you both. JVV:jd Encl. cc: Dr. Roberta Block Yours truly, James Van Valkenburg 11 -12 -85 PPrZn1 IITTf1N WHEREAS The Edina Foundation, on November 7th 1985, did reaffirm its position regarding membership and appointment thereto of the Board of Directors. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that it is the intention of The Edina Foundation that its members be selected as follows: 1. Three (3) to be appointed by the Chair of the Edina School Board with the advice and consent of the Edina School Board. 2. Three (3) to be appointed by the Mayor of Edina with the advice and consent of the Edina City Council. 3. Three (3) to be appointed as members at large by the six (6) appointed in one and two above. WHEREFORE, it be further resolved that the Article III, Section 3.02 of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation be amended to state: "That Section 3.02 'Number, Qualification and Term of Office' of the By -Laws be amended as follows: Section 3.02: Number, Qualification and Term of Office. The number of directors shall be nine (9). The number of directors may be increased or decreased to any odd number, but not less than three (3) by vote of the Board of Directors of the corporation, but any change in.the number of Directors shall receive the approval, by Resolution, of the City Council of the City of Edina and the School Board of Independent School District # 273 before such change becomes effective. The Directors currently serving, their terms, and entity appointing them are as follows: -2- A. School Board of Independent School District # 273: 1. Kay Bach 1986 2. Marilou Birkeland 1987 3. Glenn C. Smith - 1988 B. City Council of the City of Edina: 1. Robert Sherman 1986 2. James Van Valkenburg 1987 3. John Skagerberg 1988 C. Appointed by the Directors of The Foundation: 1. Lyle Bing 1986 2. Betty Hemstad 1987 3. R. Bruce Kobs 1988 All subsequent directors shall be appointed or reappointed for three (3) year terms. Each Director shall hold office until the third annual meeting of the meeting of the members next following his or her selection, or election, and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until he or she shall have been removed in a manner hereinafter provided. If the number of Directors is hereafter increased to more than nine (9), or decreased to less than nine (9), the selection of such members shall be as provided in that Resolution and accepted by the City Council and School Board as above required. No person shall be eligible to serve more than ten (10) consecutive years as a Director of this corporation, and upon completion of a period of service as a Director of this corporation, a person may not again serve as a Director within one year. ,l i -3- Persons who would be described in Section 4946 (a) (1) (A) or (C) through (G) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as hereafter amended, if this corporation were a "private foundation" as defined in Section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as hereafter amended, shall never constitute more than one -third of the Directors of this corporation; and such persons, together with representatives of banks or trust companies which serve as trustees, investment advisors, custodians, or agents for or with respect to funds of or held for the benefit of this corporation, shall never constitute more than one -half of the Directors of this corporation. The six (6) Directors appointed by the School Board Chair and the Mayor shall be residents of the City of Edina. The other three (3) Directors appointed by the remaining six (6) Directors shall either live or be employed in the City of Edina. 1ZVgOT TTTTOM WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation Board of Directors on November 7, 1985, did reaffirm its position regarding membership and appointment thereto of the Board of Directors; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of The Edina Foundation that its members be selected as follows: 1. Three (3) to be appointed by the Chair of the Edina School Board with the advice and consent of the Edina School Board. 2. Three (3) to be appointed by the Mayor of Edina with the advice and consent of the Edina City Council. 3. Three (3) to be appointed as members at large by the six (6) appointed in one and two above. WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation has further resolved that Article III, Section 3.02 of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation be amended as follows: "Section 3.02. Number, Qualification and Term of Office. The number.of directors shall be nine (9). The number of directors may be increased or decreased to any odd number, but not less than three (3) by vote of the Board of Directors of the corporation, but any change in the number of Directors shall receive the approval, by Resolution, of the City Council of the City of Edina and the School Board of Independent School District Number 273 before such change becomes effective. The Directors currently serving, their terms, and entity appointing them are as follows: A. School Board of Independent School District Number 273: 1. Kay Bach 1986 2. Marilou Birkeland 1987 3. Glenn C. Smith 1988 B. City Council of the City of Edina: 1. Robert Sherman 1986 2. James Van Valkenburg 1987 3. John Skagerberg 1988 C. Appointed by the Directors of The Foundation: 1. Lyle Bing 1986 2. Betty Hemstad 1987 3. R. Bruce Kobs 1988 All subsequent directors shall be appointed or reappointed for three (3) year terms. Each Director shall hold office until the third annual meeting of the members next following his or her selection, or election, and until his or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until he or she shall have been removed in a manner hereinafter provided. No person shall be eligible to serve more than ten (10) consecutive years as a Director of this corporation, and upon completion of a period of service as a Director of this corporation, a person may not again serve as a Director within one year. Persons who would be described in Section 4946(a)(1)(A) or (C) through (G) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as hereafter amended, if this corporation were a "private foundation" as defined in Section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as hereafter amended, shall never constitute more than one -third of the Directors of this corporation; and such persons, together with representatives of banks or trust companies which serve as trustees, investment advisors, custodians, or agents for or with respect to funds of or held for the benefit of this corporation, shall never constitute more than one -half of the Directors of this corporation. The nine (9) Directors shall be residents of Edina." WHEREAS, Article XIII of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation provides that no amendment of Section 3.02 shall be made without the approval, by resolution, of both the School Board of Independent School District Number 273 and the City Council of the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby approves the amendment to Section 3.02 as stated heretofore; and BE FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Edina Foundation for inclusion in its corporate records. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal this 3rd day of December, 1985. City Clerk HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO: PI421101 RUN DATE: 10/09/85 IP SC TWP RG QQ SFX/ 10 PREVIOUS OWNER/DESCRIPTION PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT BLK BLDG WT JUDGEMENT 32- 117 -21 41 0095 025 VALUE VALUE EDINA 33- 117 -21 31 0058 002 001 CHARLES F LEEFELDT ET AL 5008 BENTON AVE 07/16/85 100 "WARDEN ACRESP HENNEPIN COUNTYv 19- 028 -24 12 0150 013 014 5529 BROOKVIEW AVE 'HAT PART OF LOT 25 LYING E OF RR R/W TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS BY MUNIC 3 STATE LAND DEPT / / 04/17/85 800 " EDINA RIDGE" IX HWY T L B NELSON ETAL 05/19/76 06/26/85 60.600 880900 "SOUTH HARRIET PARKP HENNEPIN COUNTY MINN." r HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT NO: PI421101 ,LIST OF FORFEITED PROPERTY PAGE 10 PREVIOUS OWNER/DESCRIPTION DATE OF DATE OF BLDG WT JUDGEMENT FORFEITURE VALUE VALUE EDINA CHARLES F LEEFELDT ET AL 05/19/82 07/16/85 100 "WARDEN ACRESP HENNEPIN COUNTYv IRINN." 'HAT PART OF LOT 25 LYING E OF RR R/W STATE LAND DEPT / / 04/17/85 800 " EDINA RIDGE" IX HWY T L B NELSON ETAL 05/19/76 06/26/85 60.600 880900 "SOUTH HARRIET PARKP HENNEPIN COUNTY MINN." -- w M rT9', �. EAT 409.20 N .r20.46 -As t Y_ 89 z: s- W120 5p7c'"lIZZ53" 75 145.6 - .5 m,4 33 Q i o W 'V 9Z. �Y' N ��,tti _ W `^ `� N °i� , J ,3 • W , = 7 fT� d 2 :. Q; W 1 4 Iz N,, o M 2 N - -�— °� 3 O d o 0 .40 ° 3 tz0 X8 9 , °6.bT SJ' ;_ c� 1qA) (9S7 o > f 35 g9.2Q = � � �:0 46 j,7 � � W 0AN [A ; . ;7046 a'Q3?8 ' , S s8�ztw -29r Z ^A� s e LY E" rd Z8 ZI PDN f �7 .3 a� ' 145 a IaS. 6 ' iG5 s7 14 let 4 ,MVe, r IK�. �% °�i 5.5Z iY d 4% of 49 s�gB�N ti 145.6 Ea1i �� J W s Z • o ACRES 11 r �Cd /.�o)`� 1 .� ,.: F. �. , 3 ��;,. ��; •a RE�A f fL3.1L �a• rt` r dz �i.2a6 _ =�S Ea flaai f4 .4G rQ5.52 ? Q - a� 3 >.. , -14 l9 )i3� 9i.j2 .N a 0 30 � [ }, �- j' c • _ a 1 l �(¢� ''.e 4 - �, /� p �z 1, io �a O I Y1 _.� eT V N �•1; I5 .1` N 2.., a v: - �r�st i:•'qi �' 15 k 30 j r 1 !v O: m5B °•3tdC "W +76 r . r 'x;,y+ `.�" STCOUNJRYSIDE RD 4.+4). 1 r, rj .. - tiE 1 A T (2, CZ'! 2A) �yo ST + �� S'�K ��, rSS' v H) ' <64 ?p. o' i23q• n7o },y0 IiSo _ }40 � �. - �-- a - i�e7 •. -��' , g � - ��� . � }_t T . Ii a �N ''13 • z ,\ �a s � o , - A t5 12 -10 " �S) 999 `{ �S Y Z J Z (ZDI '$` . ��, �'�• IZ.:, oI �s N .T�.a � e 4. �5 3 5 a• lz OL � yx .• C li.! r U1 } • cc ' r 2 -31 UP. . ..... ZiAl Flo m N. I . R Alo. 134.5 301 2 of legs e . ,*; .1 2 C IN, Di� 2 4 @6*� 0 is 13 0 700 - A% ot T2 LA 130 lzo 3 !�E AVE 4 64 --6 loo IN. 5 L 5) . 7 Of w -W —)35 -fto 8 - -0 , .7 130 >I 0 SQU 2 3 AO i AS spa S LPAE LY�4: 0 1 CLQVt 7 LM 11 AM z Gko Aus 11 : f . 1 2 6 �jA S. ifYVJUA E --AVE- &;,, zo. 0 le) \11 23 :12 0 21 20 (.0 713-11 i.�-Al , 4 3- 12 L.4 U) A L u 15(.6 U) Ito 3.1 1 75 GO 2 Cl,) . aci lo r 4n Z 0 �olLA ao OD m dk 11 0 - 9 w A) 41 m 9 ce Ln 5 Sol Sze 6 C(l) --AVE- &;,, zo. 0 le) \11 23 :12 0 21 20 �1� I AN IRCHCREST .0 !4L , 3- 12 4 A L u 15(.6 lo �1� I AN IRCHCREST i a, 3' 4 lo 9 3.1 1 75 GO i a, Ir i N2.55 1101,19 0 2 (io 151 `D a �19 2r �o 135.14 � 135.14 61 133.6T� !33.2, I .t1 135 i}V_ 13 . P. 18 1:133Ld 3 1T ' 134. wt -5 1�5 133 64 W Q 135 t4 15. W Q 17 - 41. , f�l 17 4 ��►i : '� (11.11'), .e IS3 G . i 36 ` 135.; t35 S �5�1� . fyp� 16 ` S _ . ?? 5" 133.• r3 .J1 t 0 ells 6 t3.54 ' I a 504 135. A4 ,r vd -> �jA� 14 , _ 7` It, !4 ' 7 DG •f 1 e t to 131 13 43 I ;CV1� 13. , `13 .,8 h ii loo 4 13.4 64 1 32 9 �31. , �A 17, 9 1: a or ` 11414 All IDY. �^A c 1" 0 2tl� `D 35.1 '°: 151 `D � ;�p� 16 C 134.14 135.14 � 135.14 �32) 17 1 4 !33.2, ,� °116 =•., ��,,�►�: 13 . P. t33.2 15(3°): 6 �Z1 6.��O1 134. 5 1�5 i ' ,(23) 3 e 3 •� �e 5l (21) 1Z 12 z �� 35.1 113L 14 9 I 154 114 1 4 .134. v (11.11'), .e , to . i 36 2 yo3 IN 135 04 " •, i4 12 •. yr0 - o ll44 oll�•t!0 %N"I 1O 910 t00 th S W t� M _ s 4�• os< ..4 (A011 . 4T � . 2 _ r01 7 5 t G.8 6 fi o t 4 g b I 9 .2 0), � 1 v 11114 q�ii3g.3 l 'i3i?�� ;�p� 16 C 134.14 5 ti-al. Cam, 17 < 4,��. 1331. !33.2, ,� °116 =•., ��,,�►�: 3 q t33.2 �)IS' 6.��O1 134. lh� 1d i ��l I •- `o 134.51 - �4di "sa.5 ,��1� •� �e 5l i o 12 z �� 35.1 113L 14 9 I o ,)11 33.0 to CD O J W X b0 0 9 o' 9 ..: e ti c9 L q4� 9 tT 4 Cie 54,7 ;�p� 16 C 134.14 5 ti-al. 34 1.7\ l6 . �l! f34.14 . " '' s a�rl): 134.' 7 l2�, 134 6 �L1) 13 1341 8 IZ" Im &j1 12 _. Oti)13 ;.; 134 ..... 8�l 1 (�p1+ 12 .6 134. lh� 1d i ��l I •- `o 134.51 - �4di "sa.5 2 Q J° Y O a q _o _ 134. 1 •- 20 J 4. 5�$ 1 134.94 N 134 is 3 1j1) 134. tT 4 Cie 54,7 ;�p� 16 C 134.14 5 ti-al. k! : fZA)15 134.1 J. 6 1tp�: 1 /114 -134.0 7 l2�, 134 6 �L1) 13 1341 8 IZ" Im &j1 12 _. 9 C'L3j o (,q,5) 11 c � I ' . d, 1ZQ t34. 9 W Y O: m`� 1�p G3 1,� �t1�11 N 134 14Z . ;a 38(dr`- ` 1 707 � ;j; r y1 } Ot �} K oo((�� i 9 2,�1 3a t . -�� ��µ`T i,fj�i471. . to ... 134. lh� 1d i ` '� � 6 ,��1� •� �e 5l i o • �- I 4.5, .e s 731 c. 5G rI1K6 • E !B '�1 �S. ul�t ~ .2a..c2 a Ge - - `r� }9{413 34 " S ` 4 RIA, , 834 i v , a,10 _ N 40 r_ 24-63 �h 3 1�p G3 1,� �t1�11 N 134 14Z . ;a 38(dr`- ` 1 707 � ;j; 30 [Z4.5 ; 4 . -�� ��µ`T 341.4 r34.T ... 134. lh� 1d i � 6 ,��1� •� �e 5l i o • �- I 4.5, .e .134. v s 731 c. 5G rI1K6 • E !B '�1 �S. ul�t ~ .2a..c2 a Ge - - `r� }9{413 34 " S ` 4 RIA, , 834 i v , a,10 _ N 40 r_ 24-63 �h 3 1�p G3 1,� �t1�11 N 134 14Z . ;a 38(dr`- ` 1 707 � ;j; 30 [Z4.5 ; 30 0 34.1 ^0 � O $ 134 z 37r � ° 5o 14Z . ;a 38(dr`- ` 1 707 � ;j; 30 4 �: � ; 4 � � 135 i6 Wioc 4 � 1 � %4�L1�� 6.a i= (� • �at.ai�'s 6 t��o moo'•. KELLOGG PL c:. M o ]?Cie qy V '12, 1 .r to EI o a8 s,.5 r a� Q- q � j�%T 4 c nE?(51� 1f o L5 ;fiS p�Q 139.6 _ } rt6. 12301 t3. 1 �s1.9 5 °�N ��>SL J%►� 31` /T��..b `,,,130 ,�o�� L ^ lt600 - 4� ? 1p (4/ �- 7t 164. n 4 j• 12 �: 1 h1� S ��``� rs•��. N mi. Z� �/ z�3� M v ° v 30`,� c 'r � ~� a g� a•lb 3 b CA G 30 �� a. e h 142 d } 1.4E Q 'Pie h ` 25109 �g �t �� r1 20 �.� _ -•�. � � js 65 Ql $ �y� 2 0 0) 7 ftr. i« pt ` O b i .e , �'` /3y� 1 61.30; r- nq • .n •' "I ` d 4S,3'1 rpml l ''�,G.e t `- =0 ° -r�%� - ° ;d 39,� '� ✓ c+t8. 5 ti ^('J r� ,r7 �' ' 1d2.5 So ti <� R� q 0 G o^ d�'l`�° Cr 3 v a\ „ o `� •, V �I T ` r o� v Z l 23 d /V1 Ill�� ,► c Q _ t1 iA 4 �S• I12 5 130 _ .... r 2 ,r 6 .r4' , � �5'�il rj .n a 1co 1 ISO 50 '^ 140 '^ ��"`' - R/-� '?A at 1� ~ Q 4 Z � _ (S»� �� : • S' ' !30 S` 1 j0 50 p c tt • lI {. S coif• h rd0 �o,• v f 1 L ' C n 4« _ J �i'W00�0 •�.$S' :�0/ 13 I �,jZ p�O �y 2O/�3�- c� C�� b� r' r.., 3� -i r . _ ; s 'u .1 0 �. 3 I : �s �i M`a I ssji 61. f. RT?.GnT.TTTTnN WHEREAS, the City Council.of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list,of lands in said.municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non- payment,of property taxes, which said list is dated October 9, 1985, Report No. P1421101; and WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been classified by the Board.of County Commissioners.of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been-authorized by said Board.of County Commissioners; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting.pursuant to Minnesota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board.of County Commissioners of each.parcel of land described in said list as non- conser- vation land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale,of each such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved. ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City,of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as recorded in the Minutes.of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of December, 1985. City Clerk JUT "A ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO PROVIDE THAT ANNUAL ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES SHALL EXPIRE ON THE 1ST DAY OF JULY FOLLOWING THE DATE OF ISSUANCE THEREOF Section 1. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 902 is amended by adding the following thereto: "Every license issued under this Sec. 9 shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on the July 1 following its date of issuance. Licenses which have been duly issued pursuant to this Sec. 9 and which are scheduled to terminate on April 1, 1986, may be extended by the City Council so as to have a termination date of 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1986, provided that a request for extension shall be accompanied by all application data, fees, bonds, and certificates of insurance required by this ordinance for the issuance of a license. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor v ' 198'5 L OF EDINA CHECK ;TER 12 - 02 -8; GE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENJOt ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE _ z v (' 332780 11/26/85 19540.00 DAVE DLIIV -R SERVICES 10 -4200- 353 -30 11,540.00 r L *f **f* * ** -CKS 336004 11/22/85 17.25 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY. 10 -4262- 628 -62 ti I 17.25 • = ffrff * * ** -CKS 33rs00B 11/25/85 34.97 KAMAN- BEAtING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -1540- 560 -56 34.97 • r*rf rr *** —CKS I. 335012 11/25/85 24.95 AJTDNOBILr- SERVICE C CONT.REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 24.95 ! I 335013 11/25/85 40.26 ALTERNATO2.RE3UILO GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 335013 11/25/85 61.42 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REP.AIR.PARTS 40 -4540- 811 -80 101.68 • ,. rr�f *• fa* -CK$ 335026 11/26/85 4,911.6D BADGER AET:R INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 _ 336026 11/26/85 19196.50, BADGE2 METER INC WATER METERS 40 -1220- 000 -00 335026 11/26/85 689.49 BADGER METER INC R =PAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 807 -80 336026 11/25/85 102.02 BAOGER.METER INC REPAIR PARTAS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 L -, 69899.61 *f* -CKS 335033 11/25/85 110.50 BERG' F G OID TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 bj 336033 11/25/85 256.00 BERGORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 336033 11/25/85 20300 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 569.50 • _ E., f *ffff * *• -CKS 335047 11/25185 9.84 BROWN 'HOTO PHOTO SPLY 10- 4508 - 422 -42 . 9.84 4y ff*fff fff- CKS 336049 11/26/85 36.70 BURES4 °- R33ERT MEETINGS 10 -4206- 440 -44 v "I 36.70 • .• - -- -- -- - -- CKS 335054 11/25/85 35.33 BATTERY WOREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 �'" 336054 11/25/85 87.14 BATTERr.W4REHOUSE REPAIR PARTAS 10 -4540- 560 -56 V' -• 331054 11125/85 85.80- BATT= Rr.W44EHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 �r �► �R ffrfff • ** -CKS a:l • 1985 CITY OF EDINA 10 -4620- 560 -56 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 336060 11/26/85 • -, �Ri t!lfff 9 P.O. N MESSAGE 91.54 336074 11/25/85 '. 336074 11/25/85 91.54 * 335082 11/25/85 'I #lif if 33SO90 11/25185 „l 336090 11/25185 KENNEL SERV 335090 11/25/85 0 335091 11/25185 KENNEL SERV 336091 11/25/85 497.00 * 336091 11/25/85 336091 11/25/85 335091 11/25/85 336091 11/25/85 10.25 336091 11/25/85 EQUIP MAINT 336091 11/25/85 10.25 335091 11/25/85 336091 11/25/85 33SO91 11/25/85 r 336091 11/25/85 19514.14 335091 11/25/85 CONT REPAIRS 336091 11/25/85 �I. CERT POWEI TRAIN: � • .j fifff# 336108 11/25185 `�; ifff if POWE2.TRAIN REPAIR PARTAS 33S114 11/25/85 29008.06 336114 11/25/85 4b `��, 9911x• 379367.43 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 335125 11/25/85 2699852.15 335125 11/25/85 INTERFUND DIS 335125 11/26/85 109.74 336125 11/26/85 WATER 10 -4258- 446 -44 65.40 CITY OF EDINA 36.00 DALE GA EEI COMPANY 36.00 • - 237.50 DELE ;ARD FOOL- CO 79.35 _ OELESAR3 ;T00L CO 316.85 • 620.00 MERIT - SUPPLY 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY 26.40. MERIT SUPPLY 309.78 MERIT SUPPLY GEN- SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803-80 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 CALCIUM CHLORIDE 10- 4520- 318 -30 CHECK REGISTER 10 -4620- 560 -56 CLEANING SUPPLIES 11 -26 -85 PAGE 2 AMOUNT WEN301 ITEM DESCRIPTION. ___.___- ACCOUNT. NO.-.INV. 9 P.O. N MESSAGE 91.54 AMBASS4381 SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 104 -70 91.54 * * ** -CKS 190.00 CITY O 8 0DMIIGTON KENNEL SERV 10- 4278 - 470 -47 307.00 CITY,O° SLOOMI46TON. KENNEL SERV 10- 4278 - 470x47 497.00 * - *** -CKS 10.25 CDNWAY.FItE 6 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 420 -42 10.25 ** *-CKS 19514.14 CERT POWEt- TRAIN CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 464.19 CERT POWEI TRAIN: CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 29.73 CERT POWE2.TRAIN REPAIR PARTAS 10 -4540- 560 -56 29008.06 379367.43 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 10- 2050- 000 -00 2699852.15 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 10- 2050- 000 -00 109.74 CITY OF E31NA WATER 10 -4258- 446 -44 65.40 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258-646 -64 29400.00 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 10- 4283- 420 -42 59000.00 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 10- 4284 - 625 -62 409761.15 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 15- 2050 - 000 -00 999202.30, CITY OF EDINA INTERFUND DIS 27 -2050- 000 -00 119559.D7 CITY OF,E)INA INTERFUND DIS 28- 2050 - 000 -00 69175.92 CITY OF.E)INA INTERFUND DIS 40- 2050 - 000 -00 291169500.20 CITY OF.E)INA INTERFUND DIS 40- 2050 - 000 -00 468.00 CITY OF E31NA INTERFUND DIS 50- 2650- 000 -00 1189039.29 CITY OF.E)INA INTERFUND DIS 60- 2050 - 000 -00 989986.17 CITY OF EIINA INTERFUND DIS 66- 2050- 000 -00 298061486.82 • .. ... 36.00 DALE GA EEI COMPANY 36.00 • - 237.50 DELE ;ARD FOOL- CO 79.35 _ OELESAR3 ;T00L CO 316.85 • 620.00 MERIT - SUPPLY 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY 26.40. MERIT SUPPLY 309.78 MERIT SUPPLY GEN- SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803-80 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 CALCIUM CHLORIDE 10- 4520- 318 -30 PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 708 -70 CLEANING SUPPLIES 28 =4512- 708 -70 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1985 t OF EDINA CHECK STER 11 -26 -8; GE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V_ND0.2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. k P.O. p MESSAGE 336125 11/25185 498.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 811 -80. 336125 11/25/85 498.00 MERIT SOPDLY GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 811 -80 29389.43 • r *rrr* * *r -CKS 336131 11/22185 68000 ASPLUND COFFEE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 704 -70 '! 68.00 * ** -CKS 336136 11/25/85 594 -96- EARL F 4N3ERSEN SIGNS POSTS 10 -4542- 325 -30 ~I' 336136 11/25/85 173.10 EARL F.ANIERSEN SIGNS POSTS. 10 -4542- 328 -30 336136 11/25/85 201.60 EARL F ANIERSEN: SIGNS,POSTS 10 -4542- 328 -30 969.66 r .r ,'I rrrrrr r *r -CKS 336146 11/25/85 445.20, GREEN ACRES SPKL CONT.SERV 10- 4200 - 646 -64 ;:. 445.20 rrr -I rr *rrr * ** -CKS 335148 11/25/85 43080 ELVIN SAF_TY SUPPLY GEN, SUPPLIES- 10 -4504- 301 -30 -w �,.: 43.80 * . Er* h, *rrr *r* -CKS `�'_ "'i 335150 11/25/85 55.75 ELECTlN: CENTER GEN:SUPPLIES 40- 504 - 804 -80 �,�' 55.75 r- - - -- - K' r *errr * ** -CKS 335156 11/25/85 118.99 FAIRVIEW 40SPIFAL 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 G.I336156 11/25/85 299.32 FAIRVIEW iOSPITAL. IST.AID SUPPLY 10- 4510- 440.44 336156 11/25/85 254.25 FAIRVIEiw.lOSPIT AL, 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 672.56 11/22/85 20.DO 50TH FRAN:E BUS ASSN. MEETING.EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 820 -82 J`I336157 20.00 • ***r** -- - -- - ---- * ** -CKS 335167 11/25185 20.00 FIRST NATIONAL BANK: CONT SERV. 10 -4200- 500 -50 ;i 20.00 r - ,n�d r ** -CKS 336183 11/25/85 4.73 GIVENS IN_i GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646 -64 336183 11/25/85 483.95 GIVENS IN: REPAIR,.PARTAS 40 -4540- 802 -80 488.68 • _ -.. _._ _._ . _.._ .. _.. _. _ s• r ** *►* * * * -CK 336188'. 11/25/85 47.77 GRAT,341t ELECTRIC CO' REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-322-30 I 800.39 CHECK REGISTER. 11 -26 -85 PAGE 4 1985 CITY OF EDINA ITEM DESCRIPTION -------ACCOUNT NO..-INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 47.77 • 789.68 CHECK NO. DATE I. G B K SERVICES * ** -CKS !f•kff GENERAL C)4MUNICATNS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540- 560 -56 665.00 GENERAL'C3AMUNICATNS 335194 11/25/85 113.39 336194 11/25/85 40 -4504- 801 -80 336194 11/25/85 Vr� •fff•! LEROY 41LIBBY 4II 335199 11/25/85 390.50 HALL44M 390.50 * 9.23 336206 11/25/85 * -- - 335206 11/25/85 f.` 63.00 335206 11/25/85 606.33 336206 11/25/85 606.33 *. 713.02• •!ff •f INTERSTATE �► I 335209 11/25/85 is I' `I �1 335213 11/26/85 fff lf• 335218 11/25/85 �+ 33523.0 11/25/85 331256 11/25185 �I, I 336267 11/25185 v ' 335275 11/25/85 800.39 CHECK REGISTER. 11 -26 -85 PAGE 4 AMOUNT VEN001 ITEM DESCRIPTION -------ACCOUNT NO..-INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 47.77 • 789.68 6 8 K SERVICES 318.94 G B K SERVICES * ** -CKS 22.00 GENERAL C)4MUNICATNS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4540- 560 -56 665.00 GENERAL'C3AMUNICATNS AUTOMOBILES 10 -4908- 502 -50 113.39 GENERAL C)MMUNICATNS GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 800.39 * 19.94 6 T PARTS 19.94 * 789.68 6 8 K SERVICES 318.94 G B K SERVICES 256.60 G B K SERVICES 293.53 6 8 K SERVICES 19658.75 • 35.83 GENUIIIE PARTS. 35.83 * 720.00 LEROY 41LIBBY 720.00 * 390.50 HALL44M 390.50 * 9.23 HOFF 'IILLIAMSON 9.23 * -- - 63.00 ICSI 63.00 * 606.33 IBM CO:R!OiATION 606.33 *. 713.02• INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 LAUNDRY 40- 4262 - 801 -80 GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 SERVICES 40 -4200- 800 -80 LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 120 -12 CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 420 -42 EOUIPiRENTAL 10- 4226- 510 -51 REPAIR -PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 ** *-CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * **-CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1935 '1 OF EDINA v CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 336275 11/25/85 50.94 335275 11/25/85 33.43 797.39 • CHECK STER 11 -26 -8. GE 5 VENOOI� ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 • * ** -CKS ` t * ** -CKS ` ** *-CKS 4 4 ff!!f• I „ 336278 11/25/85 21.00 JERRYS FOODS MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 440 -44 21.00 • 335279 11/25/85 76.57 JERRYS OUt,OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 336279 11/25/85 164.91 JERRYS OUt OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 336279 11/25/85 35.02 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 328 -30. •vi' 336279 11/25/85 37.29 JERRYS QUA OWN .HDWE GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504- 340 -30 336279 11/25/85 6.90 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 390 -30 336279 11/25185 48.05 JERRYS DUI OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 336279 11/25/85 5.64 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 336279 11/25185 14.75 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 336279 11/25/85 19.30 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 M, 336279 11/25/85 25.27 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 336279 11/25/85 15.22 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 335279 11/25/85 34.07 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 600 -60 336279 11/25/85 6.94 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 ;'. 336279 11/25/85 19.87 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 440 -44 336279 11/25/85 9.89 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646-64 ., 336279 11/25/85 42.17 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 336279 11/25/85 824.25 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4900 - 390 -30 336279 11/25/85 38.59 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 ow 336279 11/25/85 20.56 JERRYS OUt, OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 660 -66 336279 11/25/85 32.30 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 336279 11/25/85 28.16 JERRYS OUA. OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 27 -4620- 662-66 �. 336279 11/25/85 10.58 JERRYS OUt OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 336279 11/25/85 62.09 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 336279 11/25185 2.99 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803 -80 336279 11/25/85 14.54 JERRYS OUA OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 336279 11/25/85 4.09 JERRYS.OU.A•OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 805 -80 I 19600.01 • M ' !fflf! 336301 11/25/85 40.00 KREMER SPAS. B ALIGN- REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 « flit if 336304 11/25/85 18.75 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 q,; j 335304 11/25/85 54.43 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 340 -30 :•. 336304 11/25/85 28.15 KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 646 -64 �.� 336304 11/25/85 12.50 KNOX.LUMBER CO _ _ REPAIR PARATS _ 10- 4540- 646 -64 vl 336304 11/25/85 11.25 -, KNOX LUMBER CO CREDIT 10- 4540- 646 -64 I° 335304 11/25/85 214.79 KNOX LUMBER CO GUARD RAIL 10- 4546 - 340 -30 336304 11/22/85 41.78 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 336304 11/22185 263.97 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 336304 11/25/85 26.83 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 4604- 646 -64 336304 11/25/85 11.22 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER _,10- 10 -4604- 646 -64 336304 11/22/85 29.10 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 • * ** -CKS ` t * ** -CKS ` ** *-CKS 4 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE I, �- 336304 11/26/85 V ffff ►f # P.O. 0 MESSAGE 336317 11/25/85 335317 11/25/85 335317 11/25/85 336317 11/25185 �- 336317 11/25/85 336317 11/22/85 ' ffffff GEN SUPPLY 336323 11/25/85 336323 11/25185 335324 11/22/85 336324 11/22/85 '- 335324 'I 11/22/85 336324 11/22/85 335324 11122185 336324 11/22/85 336324 11/22/85 336324 11/22/85 !! 336324 11/22/85 336324 11/22185 335324 11/22/85 336324 l 11/22/85 �' f!lfff 335343 11/25/85 10- 4228-160 -16 335344 33634.4 "�.._ 336344 336344 "I. 336359 336359 336359 i, 336360 336360 " 336360. 336360 11/25/85 11/25/85 11/25/85 11/25/85 AMOUNT 36.07 732.34 f 64.99 101.04 338.67 247.98 389.42 5.45 19147.45 10.00 5.00- 15.00 781.62 - 19005.51 781.62 19455.43 29020.10 19520.02 749.69 29255.00 19350.79 234.19 234.20 234.19 119059.72 80.64 80.64 • 84.00 8.00- 13.00- . 240.16 303.16 • CHECK REGISTER _ MINN TORO 11 -26 -85 PAGE 6 fENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 708 -70 INC 19476.02 * ** -CKS LAWSON PR))UCTS GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 322 -30 WANNER LAWSON PR))UCTS GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 325 -30 WANNER LAWSON PR)DUCTS GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646-64 WANNER LAWSON PR30UCTS PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 WANNER LAWSON PR)DUCTS PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 LAWSON.PRDDUCTS FREIGHT 27- 4292 - 662 -66 * **-CKS LINH3F =l. PHOTO SUPPLY 10- 4508 - 440 -44 LINHOFFI PHOTO SUPPLY 10 -4508- 440 -44 LOGIS CORRECTION 10- 4228-160 -16 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4228 - 160 -16 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4228- 160 -16 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10 -4230- 160 -16 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4233 - 200 -20 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4233 - 420 -42 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4233 - 560 -56 LOGI3 COMPUTER BILLING 10- 4906 - 420 -42 LOGI3 COMPUTER BILLING 40- 4232 - 800 -80 LOGI3 COMPUTER BILLING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 50 -4233- 840 -84 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 50- 4233 - 860 -86 * ** -CKS MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 NED OXTGEI & EQUIP NED OXISEII & EQUIP _. NED OXYGEI.& EQUIP RED DXYGE.l & EQUIP 11/26/85 19400.00 _ MINN TORO INC 11/26/85 11.52- MINN TORO INC 11/26/85 87.54 MINN,TORO INC 19476.02 11/25/85 35.00 MINNESOTA WANNER 11/25/85 64.00 MINNESOTA WANNER 11/25/85 31.00 MINNESOTA WANNER 11/25/85 54.00 MINNESOTA, WANNER CREDIT CREDIT CREDIT EQUIP MAINT EQUIP MAINT CREDIT. REPAIR.PARTS 10- 4274 - 449 -44 10-4274-449-44 10- 4274 - 449 -44 10- 4274 - 449-44 27 -4274- 670 -66 27 -4540- 670 -66 27- 4540- 670 -66 CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 322 -30 CONT REPAIRS. 10- 4248- 560 -56 CONT REPAIRS �10- 4248-560 -56 PARTS. . 10 -4620- 560 -56 * **-CKS V • 1905 �( OF EDINA CHECK STER 11-26 -8'. 4GE 7 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT YEVDO2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE i 184.00 • • rrrara a►a -CKS ~I 336370 11/26/85 586.06 MIDLAND P.ADDUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 704 -70 586.06 IS, rffltf • *• —CKS �. 33S374 11/25/85 220.00 MN PACK & REC ASSN CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 600 -60 220.00 • r arrrrr rra —CKS 336381 11/22/85 57.00 STAR'S TRI3UNE ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 160 -16 57.00 '•i arrltr • *+ —CKS 1w 336385 11/26/85 240.00 MCGUIREt 10BERT TREE INSPECTION 10 -4242- 353 -30 336385 11/26/85 480.00 MCGUIREi 40SERT TREE INSPECTION 60- 1300 - 012 -18 720.00 arf•!r rrr —CKS v 1. 336412 11/25/85 50.88 NY GRAPHI ". SUPPLY INV.SPLY .23- 1209 - 000 -00 336412 11/25/85 32.40 NY GRAPHI= 'SUPPLY INVENTORY.SPLJY 23 -1209- 000 -00 ' 83.28 • 4 -' frfrlr raa —CKS wl F. 336421 11/25/85 102.29 OLSON CHAIN '& CABLE GUARD RAIL _ 10- 4546 - 340 -30 102.29 • - ` rffrir • +; —CKS `I 336441 11/22/85 229.40 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING. 10 -4600- 628 -62 229.40 • a..... aar —CKS 336443 11/22/85 10.65 PDMMER•MFs!'CO GEN SUPP' " - -10- 4504 - 624 -62 10.65* ` " r rfffff aar —CKS Il_ 336449 11/25/85 230.01 P F C EQUIP REPAIR PARATS 40 -4540- 805 -80 230.01 • " vl' ^i � arfr!! rra —CKS 336452 11/25/85 45.00, QUICK SERY'BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 4 1 336452 11/25/85 63.48 'OUICK;.SERY•BATTERY'. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 ` 336452 11/25/85 97.50 _ - 'QUICK;SERY- BATTERY _ REPAIR PARTS _ - 10 -4540- 560 -56 ' "� 336452. 11/25/85- 15.00: OUICK,SERY;BATTERY REPAI.R.PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 1 AMOUNT 220.98 * 28.80 28.80 * 8.15 8.15 * CHECK REGISTER 11 -26 -85 PAGE 8 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION___ _ACCOUNT-NO..INV- A P.O. # MESSAGE RITEW4F REPAIR PARTS RICHFIELD 3LUHB & CO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4540- 560 -56 28 -4248- 707 -70 63.83 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 63.83 * 69690000, 1985 CITY OF EDINA 10- 3095- 000 -00 CHECK N0. DATE SUR TAX. ffffff 336455 11/25/85 f.•f *• 336465 11/26/85 �- ff *ff• GEN "SUPPLY. 10 -4594- 460 -46 336475 11/25/85 I�•I :••.ff 34.78 SOUTHDALE FORD 336485 11/25185 34.78 • 336485 11/25/85 i 336486 11/25/85 REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 36.68 ff•f ** 28.73 336492 11/25/85 h- 51.02 SUBUR3AM_:HEVROLET, �- 335498 11/25/85 - - - -- •.' i ffffff CONT.REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 336502 11/25/85 REPAIR PARTS 336502 11/25/85 •'I, 335503 11/22185 j_, 336503 11/25/85 10- 2149- 000 -00 11.75 ST PAUU BOOK. ` "I fffftf 27.97 * MINNESOTA, SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS 336508 11/25/85 66.38 ST P4UU BIOK 336508 11/25/85 336505 11/25/85 w '1 336508 11/22/85 1 i`!:8'1- • . 151.92 * 336508 11/25/85 336508 11/25/85 ' - u AMOUNT 220.98 * 28.80 28.80 * 8.15 8.15 * CHECK REGISTER 11 -26 -85 PAGE 8 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION___ _ACCOUNT-NO..INV- A P.O. # MESSAGE RITEW4F REPAIR PARTS RICHFIELD 3LUHB & CO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4540- 560 -56 28 -4248- 707 -70 63.83 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 63.83 * 69690000, STATE BLD3 INSP BLDG. PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 109.00 STATE BLDI INSP SUR TAX. 10- 3113 - 000 -00 69799.00 * 23.00 DON STR- cI:HER GUNS GEN "SUPPLY. 10 -4594- 460 -46 23.00 * 34.78 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS LO -4540- 560 -56 34.78 • 36.68 STAR.t- ELE .-TTRONICS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 36.68 28.73 SUBURBAN :HEVRDLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 51.02 SUBUR3AM_:HEVROLET, REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 79.75* - - - -- 21.55 SUBURBAN:NLUMS SUP CONT.REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 72 -14 SUBURBAN 2LUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 807 -80 93.69 * 30.91 ST PAUL'B30K CABLE TV 10- 2149- 000 -00 11.75 ST PAUU BOOK. CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 27.97 * MINNESOTA, SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS ADVERTISING 10-4210-140-14 66.38 ST P4UU BIOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 10 -4504- 510 -51 27.66 ST PAULt.,BJOK> GEN,SUPPLIES UP.PLY;, __ -23 -4504- 611 -61'.- - - 1 i`!:8'1- • . 151.92 * * ** -CKS * *• -CKS * ** -CKS ** *-CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS *** -CKS * ** -CKS 19256.94 CHECK STER ` 1955 ^I OF EDINA AMOUNT VEN)Ot 40- 4540 - 803 -8D v! ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1j822.34, *` CHECK NO. DATE REPAIR _ _ PARTS * ** -CKS I� SEARS.RDE33CK GEN SUPPLIES 335516 11/25/85 194.56 336516 11/22/85 CONT.REPAIRS. 336545 11/25/85 r i � tetr*• 335553 11/25/85 336553 11/25/85 335553 11/25/85 TWIN Crr 34RAGE 336553 11/25/85 �i 335553 11/25/85 1wi i r *r :rr 336572 11/25/85 336573 11/25/85 ,,; j: 336573 11/25/85 y � rrrrrr 31.94 ='r 335575 11/25/85 „! 336575 11/25/85 "I 336575 11/25/85 10 -4540- 520 -52 336575 11/25/85 r REPAIR PARTS, r�. 110.12 UNITED ELECTRIC.CORP. REPAIR PARTS "I,_ 335586 11/2S/85 vl_ 336586. 11/25/85 *rt *r* of . 336594 11/25/85 VAN PAPER CO PAPER.SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 254.00 �� rrrrrr 107.23 VOSS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 647 -64 22.32 336703 11/22/85 REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 661 -66 336704 11/22/85 • 19256.94 CHECK STER 377.70, WATER.PRO)UCTS 11 -26 -8: GE 9 AMOUNT VEN)Ot 40- 4540 - 803 -8D ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 1j822.34, *` .PARTS 10- 4540 - 647 -64 REPAIR _ _ PARTS * ** -CKS 199.98 SEARS.RDE33CK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 500 -50 194.56 SEARS,ROE3UCK, CONT.REPAIRS. 28 -4248r 708 -70 394.54 *** —CKS 766.78 TWIN Crr 34RAGE DODR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 766.78 * *** —CKS 21.36 UNIT =D EL =CTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 322 -30 31.94 UNITED EL =CTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 322 -30 17.35 UNITED EL:CTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 25.23 UNITED EL?CTRIC'CORP, REPAIR PARTS, 10 -4540- 646 -64 110.12 UNITED ELECTRIC.CORP. REPAIR PARTS 23 -4540- 611 -61 206.00 + * ** —CKS 254.00 VAN PAPER CO PAPER.SUPPLIES 10- 4514 - 520 -52 254.00 107.23 VOSS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 647 -64 22.32 VOSS REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 661 -66 129.55 * ** —CKS 19256.94 WATER PR03UCTS 377.70, WATER.PRO)UCTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 87.70 WATER.PR03UCTS 40- 4540 - 803 -8D 100.00. WATER,'PRO)UCTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 1j822.34, *` .PARTS 10- 4540 - 647 -64 :133.17 W W 6RAIN;ER 138.46 W W GRAINER 271.63 + 39604.16 STORE -FRONT 39404.16 425.00. EDINA 3LD; DEPT. 425.00 +. 29.95 RD,jGER.: LA),tENCE PD CONST 27 -1300- 000 -00 REPAIR.P'ARTS. 40- 4540 - 803 -80 PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -8D -REPAIR REPAIR PARATS 40 -4540- 803 -80 REPAIR .PARTS 10- 4540 - 647 -64 REPAIR _ _ PARTS __ 40- 4540 - 802 -80 SERVICES_ 10 -4224- 504 -50 SAC FEE 60- 1300 - 010 -29 REPAIR PARTS. 10- 4294- 440 -44 ** *—CKS ** *—CKS * ** —CKS ti 1985 CITY OF EDINA HECK N0. DATE 336705 336706 335707 335708 V 336109 336710 M 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 336711 j 336712 AMOUNT VE4001 �I 336713 v) 336714 f' 336715 v 10 -4204- 440 -44 30.00 336716 336717 9.00 C F ANDERSON COMP 1ST AID SUPP 336718 , �T 336718 55.00 336719 f. 336719 owl I * 336721 -_ I A F C MEMBERSHIP 336722 60.00 * 4 e O 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 11/22/85 12.00 MLN DEPT 3F PUBLIC 12.00.! - - 19408.50 FISCO BUYER CARD 50- 4310 - 840 -84 CLOTHING REPLACEMENT' 10- 4574- 440 -44 CHECK REGISTER 11-26 -85 PAGE 10 AMOUNT VE4001 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. I P.O. 0 MESSAGE 29.95 * 30.00 CITIZAV L -AGUE MEMBERSHIP 10 -4204- 440 -44 30.00 * 9.00 C F ANDERSON COMP 1ST AID SUPP 1D- 4510 - 440 -44 9.00 . 55.00 OATREK'MAIKETING PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 55.00 * 60.00 I A F C MEMBERSHIP 10 -4204- 440 -44 60.00 * 148.78 YM B FECK LODGING 10 -4202- 440 -44 148.78 * 189.80 XEROX CDR31- EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 510 -51 189.80 105.00 NAT1344L _EAGUE OF ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 160 -16 105.00 * 500.00. JOE GREUPNER SERVICES 27 -4100- 675 -66 500.00 * 680.55 ALP�A VIDEO 8 AUDIO REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 680.55 * 50.00 MOREAU J SANKEY REGISTRATION 10 -4202- 200 -20 50.00 * 155.53 SUSAN 4002= MEETINGS 10 -2149- 000 -00 155.53 * 19722.60 DEAN CDNSTANTINE DANCE INSTRUCTION 10 -2240- 000 -00 19722.60 787.50 MARK HUID GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 500 -50 787.50 * 738.00 E H %ENNEI & SONS CONT- REPAIRS 10-4248-646-64 1.530.00 E H 1EINE1 B SONS CONT. REPAIRS, 10 -4248- 646 -64 29268.00 * 2.50 R C IDENTIFICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 2.50_ R C„ IDENTIEICAT.IONS GEN SUPPLIES. 10- 4504_490 -.49 5.00 * ** CKS 12.00 MLN DEPT 3F PUBLIC 12.00.! - - 19408.50 FISCO BUYER CARD 50- 4310 - 840 -84 CLOTHING REPLACEMENT' 10- 4574- 440 -44 19it5`I OF EDINA CHECK STER 11726 -8 GE it r CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT YENDOI, ITEM DESCRIPTION. ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE • CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -4900- 300 -30 OFFICE SUPPLY _ .. 10 -4516- 200 -20 INST.FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61 CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTAS, 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 REPAIR.PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 REPAIR�PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR -PARTS EQUIP, RENAL REPAIR PARTS CONT.REPAIRS, TELEPHONE T POWER ;REIMBURSENENTS 40 -4540- 813 -80 10- 4226 - 301 -30 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4248 - 440 -44 10 -4 256- 510 -51 10- 4252 - 345 -30 10- 4202 - 420 -42 19408.50 • 336123 11/22/85 429164.00. LAKELAVD TRUCK CTR j 429164.00 + 1 336724 11/25/85 40.00 AMERICAN:.DUNCIL OF .. 40.00 • 336725 11/25/85 171.84 ROSE EDIN 171.84 • 336726 11/25/85 303.68 SAFWAT STEEL PROD i 303.68 • 336727 11/25/85 127.65 BRODIEAD 'sARRETT CD. �.` 127.65 •. 336728 11/25/85 72.85 WEST WELD „i 72.85 •. 336729 11/25185 62.37 CONVEYORS! +, 62.37 • . �? 336730 11/25/85 73.20 MECO y.4 73.20.+ 1- 33ST31 11/25/85 282.72 ZAHL EOJIxMENT CD 282.72 336732 11/25/85 2.47 FLEET.MAIVTENANCE j 2.47 + I.I ") 333133 11/25/85 109.72 ROAD RESCJE INC 109.72 * 1_. ;I 336734 11125/85 367.00, ESS BROTH =RS & SONS �� 367.00:• 336735 11/25/85 280.00 JOHN.TRACY 4i. 280.00 • i 336736: 11/25/85 65.20 ^ELECTRIC ROTOR °t 65.20.• 336737 11/25/85 85.00 CUSTOM CAIERA ,� II' i 85.0 0 • - -- ^S'r 336738 11/25/85 95.02 A T.6 F 95.02•: j 336739 11/25/85 134.46 CITY OF. RICHFIELD g< 134.46 • 336740.' 11/25/85 131.73 NANCY. .KARKHOFF �'6 131.73.:• , _. • CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -4900- 300 -30 OFFICE SUPPLY _ .. 10 -4516- 200 -20 INST.FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61 CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00 GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTAS, 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 REPAIR.PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 REPAIR�PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 REPAIR -PARTS EQUIP, RENAL REPAIR PARTS CONT.REPAIRS, TELEPHONE T POWER ;REIMBURSENENTS 40 -4540- 813 -80 10- 4226 - 301 -30 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4248 - 440 -44 10 -4 256- 510 -51 10- 4252 - 345 -30 10- 4202 - 420 -42 T- s 86.40 * 1985 CITY OF EDINA M MINVALCD INC 92.54 MINVALCD INC CHECK NO. DATE 41.97 JOAN'W4TEASTREET 41.97 * 336741 11/25/85 419.51 * 3429575.00 FIRST TRUST ST PAUL 336742 11/25/85 3749324.99 * 336742 11/25/85 TYPCO INC. 336742 11/25/85 49667.50 336743 11/25/85 +� !' 336744 11/25/85 20.15 336745 11/25/85 I I 336745 11/25/85 .• 336746 11/25/85 +t 339.96 HILLS .j 336747 11/25/85 LOU 43RAH44' 336748 11/25/85 i� _ MORTON THIOKOL INC 19100.48 * 336749 11/25/85 I, 610.00 POLICE 336750 11/25/85 35.00 BONNIE BRAXTON. 35.00 336751 11/25/85 ts,.. 53.24 ALEXANDER MFG 336752 11/25/85 .336753 11/25/85 u 336754 11/25185 335755 11/25/85 335756 11/25/85 I' _336757 _ ._ -_ 11/25/85 I. 336758 11/25/85 SL e CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOt ITEM DESCRIPTION 86.40. E A SWEEN CO 86.40 * 498.80. MINVALCD INC 36.04 MINVALCD INC 92.54 MINVALCD INC 627.38 * 41.97 JOAN'W4TEASTREET 41.97 * 419.51 EDWARD KRAEMER 419.51 * 3429575.00 FIRST TRUST ST PAUL 319749.99 FIRST TRUST ST PAUL 3749324.99 * 10.00 TYPCO INC. 10.00 • 49667.50 DE OE HENIEL 49667.50 • 20.15 WET N DRY BASEMENT 20.15 600.00 N CRAIG J34NSON 600.00 • 140.00 ASHTDY TAPE 140.00 * 339.96 HILLS 339.96 * 38.24 LOU 43RAH44' 38.24 * 19100.48 _ _ MORTON THIOKOL INC 19100.48 * 39008.46 FEED RITE CONTROLS 30008.46 * 610.00 POLICE 610.00 35.00 BONNIE BRAXTON. 35.00 638.40 _- HOLIDAY 638.40 _ 53.24 ALEXANDER MFG CONCESSIONS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REIMBURSEMENT GEN SUPPLIES DUE HRA INTEREST BONDS RUBBISH ".REMOVAL PRO SERV REFUND WOODHAVEN.APPRAISAL SOFTWARE INV SPJL7 MILEAGE SALT WATER SUPPLYU CAR WASHING REIMBURSEMENT AMMUNITION _ RADIO SERV' 11 -26 -85 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P -O. 0 MESSAGE 28- 4624- 704 -70 10- 4540 - 540 -54 40 -4540- 802 -80 40 -4540- 802 -80 10- 4202 - 420 -42 40- 4504 - 803 -80 10 -1145- 000 -00 _27 -4300- 660 -66 10 -4250- 353 -30 10- 2235 - 000 -00 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 2143 - 000 -00 10-4906-500-50 23- 1209 - 000 -00 40- 4208 - 806 -80 10- 4538- 318 -30 40- 4622 - 805 -80 10- 4296 - 560 -56 10- 4200 - 421 -42 29-4592-720-72 10- 4294 - 440 -44 i • • a a a 1965 `( OF EDINA 11 -26 -8, GE 13 AMOUNT VEN301'. ITER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO. DATE 336759 11/25/85 b 33S760. 11/25/85 40 -4540- 802 -80 336761 11/25/85 335762 11/25/85 A PLUS PR =SORT 336763 11/25/85 ' 336764 11/25/85 �j 335764 11/25/85 DUES 336764 11/25/85 I s i I 40.00 336765 11/25/85 23- 3500 - 000 -00 .40.00 • 336766 11/25/85 I CLERICAL FEE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 36.00 *** *** i `I 336769 11/26/85 CLERICAL FEE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 4.00- LOIS BECH 336770 11/26/85 i LOIS 3ECH CLASS REFUND 23- 3800 - 000 -00 336771 11/26/85 C_ 336172 11/26/85 OERN31 Coy• DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 i 1, 336773 11126185 336774 11/26/85 ROOM B 80ARO 33S775- 11/26/85 .'� 336775 11/26185 I -. _ -- - -- * * * -CKS 336776 11/26/85 REFUND 336777 11/26/85 • • • a a a CHECK ;TER 11 -26 -8, GE 13 AMOUNT VEN301'. ITER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INY. N P.O. I MESSAGE 53.24 -• 38.00 ACE M41UF4CTURING REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 802 -80 38.00 92.12 A PLUS PR =SORT POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 92.12 • 55.00 AM SOCIET /.OF DUES 10 -4204- 420 -42 55.00.* 40.00 JEAN LEI_ CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 .40.00 • - 36.00 JAN BROYER- CLERICAL FEE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 36.00 20.00 LOIS BE:CH CLERICAL FEE 23- 3500 - 000 -00 4.00- LOIS BECH CLASS REFUND 23 -3800- 000 -00 4.00- LOIS 3ECH CLASS REFUND 23- 3800 - 000 -00 12.00 *- 1.723.02 OERN31 Coy• DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 19723.02 244.72 SHERIFFS )EPT ROOM B 80ARO 10 -4286- 220 -22 244.72 _ -- - -- * * * -CKS 32.00 CAROL'4ENfGES REFUND 28- 3415 - 000 -00 32.00 • 73.40 NADE4 INDJSTREIS CON_T:REPAIRS 28 -4248- 708 -70 73.40 t 390.65 HOLNST_N :RINKNASTER GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -70 390.65 141.48 E Z SHARP GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 141.48 • 30.00 CARAL 3UR44STER REFUND 28- 3415- 000 -00 30.00 • 30.00 EDINA HOCCEY ASSN. REGISTRATION FEE 10 -2240- 000 -00 30.,00 ! - - - - -. 8009000.00 FIRST.BANK -RPLS BONDS PAYABLE 66 -2060- 000 -00 2079075.00 FIRST_.BANi(,NP.LS. UNAPP- SURPLUS 66 -2490- 000 -00 1900791i75.00 * _.- 50.00 _ - -_ BECKIE RO ;r_RS DATCARE 10- 4200 - 280 -28 50.00.* - - - -- - - -- - - - - - 55.00.,. ANTJE BIL "•UTAY. CLASS REFUND 23 -3500- 000 -00 • • a a a 1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -26 -85 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENOOt ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 55.00 r 335778 11/26/85 40.00 INTER 4SS1 OF SUBSCRIBTION 10- 4204 - 420 -42 �.I^I 40.00 • � 336779 11/26/85 30.00 MN CHIEFS OF POLICE DUES 10 -4204- 420 -42 30.00 • / rrrrrr *r * —CKS 7579107.89 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL -FUND 1 409161.15 FUID 15 TOTAL DORKING CAPITAL FUND 914.45 FUND 23 TOTAL ART•CENTER 1349597.72 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 139694.79 FUID 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 638.40 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 4„'' 291389816 -33 FUVD 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 19752.08 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 1189944.29 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND ` 191069061.17 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION 02 Computer Checks Ps 67311 ' 493139288.27 TOTAL 67462 I V 1 i ` %w _ fif+f�I1l.L I„ �.� �. D.:7F —J to n .n __- b 'a 1 40 i- - - - - - - .__..._ ......