HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-02_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 2, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meeting of November 4, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 18, 1985, and Special Meeting of
November 13, 1985, approved as submitted by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Barbara W. Feiler, 5201 Duncraig Road - Generally located north of
Vernon Avenue and north of Duncraig Road (Cont'd from 11/18/85)
B. Set Hearing Date (12/16/85)
1. Zoning Change - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors
District and Preliminary Plat Approval - Grandview Development Company
2. Final Development Plan - Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 So. County Road 18
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Steiner, Gilason - 4301 -05 W. 62nd Street,
Lots 41 and 42, South Harriet Park
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed,
action by Resolution. Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Utility Easement Vacation - Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Snow Plow Cutting Edges
B. Handicapped Bathrooms - Edina Art Center
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Recommendation for Issuance of On -Sale Wine License - Empress Restaurant
B. AMM Study of Metropolitan Significance Review Process
C. 1986 Council Work Plan
D. Signal Plan Approval - Londonderry Drive /County 418
E. Hennepin County Appointments - 1986
F. Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement - SWSCC
G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
H. Post Agenda and 11anager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. The Edina Foundation - Resolution Regarding Terms of Members
B. Tax - Forfeited Land - Report No. P1421101 dated 10/9/85
VII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second
Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 902 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 to Provide That Annual
On -Sale Liquor Licenses Shall Expire on the lst Day of July
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 2, 1985
Page Two
VIII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for payment of the
following claims dated 12/2/85: General Fund $757,107.89, Working Capital
Fund $30,761.15, Art Center $914.45, Golf Course Fund $134,597.72,
Recreation Center Fund $13,694.79, Gun Range Fund $638.40, Utility Fund
$2,138,816.33, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,752.08, Construction Fund
$118,944.29, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,106,061.17, Total $4,313,288.27
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Dec. 2 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Dec. 9 Special Council Meeting - Accessory Uses
7:00 p.m. Council Rm.
7:00 p.m. Conference Rm
Mon Dec. 16 Regular Council Meeting _ 7:00 p.m. Council Rm
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 2, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meeting of November 4, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 18, 1985, and Special Meeting of
November 13, 1985, approved as submitted by motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval
* 1. Barbara W. Feiler, 5201 Duncraig Road - Generally located north of
Vernon Avenue and north of Duncraig Road (Cont'd from 11/18/85)
B. ;. Set Hearing Date (12/16/85)
1. Zoning Change - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors
District and Preliminary Plat Approval- - Grandview Development Company
2. Final Development Plan - Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 So. County Road 18
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Steiner, Gilason - 4301 -05 W. 62nd Street,
Lots 41 and 42, South Harriet Park
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed,
action by Resolution. Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
* A. Utility Easement Vacation - Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Snow Plow Cutting Edges
* B. Handicapped Bathrooms - Edina Art Center
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Recommendation for Issuance of On -Sale Wine License - Empress Restaurant
* B. AMM Study of Metropolitan Significance Review Process
C. 1986 Council.Work Plan
* D. Signal Plan Approval - Londonderry Drive /County X618
* E. Hennepin County Appointments - 1986
* F. Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement - SWSCC
G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
H. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. The Edina Foundation - Resolution Regarding Terms of Members
* B. Tax - Forfeited Land - Report No. P1421101 dated 10/9/85
VII. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second
Reading: Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. First Reading
* 1. Ordinance No. 902 -A2 - Amending Ordinance No. 902 to Provide That Annual
On -Sale Liquor Licenses Shall Expire on the 1st Day of July
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 2, 1985
Page Two
VIII. FINANCE
Yz� A. Claims Paid. Motion of
seconded by , for payment of the
following claims dated 12/2/85: General Fund $757,107.89, Working Capital
Fund $30,761.15, Art Center $914.45, Golf Course Fund $134,597.72,
Recreation Center Fund $13,694.79, Gun Range Fund $638.40, Utility Fund
$2,138,816.33, Liquor Dispensary Fund_$1,752.08, Construction Fund
$118,944.29, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,106,061.17, Total $4,313,288.27
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon
Dec.
2
Regular
Council
Meeting
Mon
Dec.
9
Special
Council
Meeting - Accessory Uses
Mon
Dec.
16
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00 p.m. Council Rm.
7:00 p.m. Conference Rm
7:OO p.m. Council Rm
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
NOVEMBER 4, 1985
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, and
Courtney.
MINUTES of the Joint HRA /Council Meeting of October 7, 1985 were approved as
submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING PROPERTY WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT. Mr. Rosland explained that.when the Edina Housing and Redevelopment
Authority approved the 1985 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
A,parcel of land was inadvertently omitted from the 1985 Project Area. It is
recommended that the Council adopt a resolution amending the 1985 Project Area
to include this parcel. Commissioner Bredesen then introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE 1985 AMENDMENT
TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN; AMENDING THE 1985 PROJECT AREA
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment
plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15,
designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also
constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 445.421, subdivision 13, and a tax increment financing plan, pursuant
to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74. The Plan established
a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.17, subdivision 9 (the "District "). The HRA and the Edina City
Council have approved amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1985 Amendment
to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1985 Amendment "). The HRA
has been informed that a parcel of land was inadvertently omitted from the
1985 Project Area, as defined -in the 1985 Amendment. The legal description of
such omitted parcel is Lot 1, Block 1, Northwestern Financial Center (the "Land ").
It has been proposed that the _HRA include the Land in the 1985 Project Area.
The Land was not intended to be included in the District.
2. The 1985 Project Area included in the 1985 Amendment is amended to include
the Land, provided the Land is not to be included in the District. The Edina
City Council is hereby requested to approve such amendment of the 1985 Project
Area. Upon receipt of such approval by the Edina City Council, the Executive
Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and
directed to proceed with the amendment of the 1985 Project Area.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Attest:
Director
Chairman
H.R.A. Minutes. of November 4, 1985
Page Two
There being no further business on the HRA agenda, the meeting was adjourned by
motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Kelly. Motion carried.
Gordon L. Hughes
Executive Director
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 18, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PRESENTS CHECK TO CITY. Ms. Aileen Kulah,
President of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, presented a check in the
amount of $7,500 to the City and explained that this represents the participation
of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in the development of Bredesen Park.
Mayor Courtney extended thanks on behalf of the Council Members and the City for
the contribution.
EMPLOYEE COLLEEN PAULUS COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Colleen Paulus,
Assistant Sanitarian, advising that she has been employed by the City since 1979.
He explained that.her chief responsibility is the inspection of the City's
restaurants and that she has developed a slide presentation for food.handlers
and a complaint assignment chart for monitoring the restaurants. Mr. Rosland
commended Mrs. Paulus for her excellent work and presented her with a silver pen
bearing the Edina Logo. Members of the Council also expressed their appreciation
for her dedication and effort.
MINUTES of the October 21 and November 4, 1985 Regular Meetings and Special Meet-
ings of October 21, November 4 and November 12, 1985 were approved as submitted
by motion of Member Turner, seconded by.Member Kelly.
Ayes.:' Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR BARBARA FEILER CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 2, 1985; FINDINGS, REASONS
AND DECISION TO BE PREPARED. Affidavits of Notice.were presented by Clerk, approved
and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for pre-
liminary plat approval for Lot 23 and.the north 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Block 1,
Edina Highlands noting that the subject property is located on the northerly end
of the Duncraig Road cul -de -sac. Directly east of the property is the Villa Way
apartment complex and to the north, west and south are developed single family
lots. The property contains approximately 73,000 square feet and is developed
with a single family dwelling. The existing dwelling is located in the notch in
the northwesterly corner of Lot 23, directly north of the existing house on Lot 22.
The easterly three - quarters of Lot 23 is characterized by steep slopes. Mr. Larsen
advised that the proponent has submitted a proposal to subdivide the property in
order to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain approximately
31,500 square feet and the lot remaining for the existing dwelling would contain
41,400 square feet, which would include the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22. The
new lot would meet or exceed the minimum standards for established in the
Zoning Ordinance. However, the lot remaining for the existing dwelling would
not meet the minimum frontage or lot widths standards of the Ordinance. The lot
would have a frontage of approximately 10 feet on the street where 30 feet is re-
quired. The Ordinance also requires that lots provide a minimum width of 75 feet
at a point 50 feet from the front property line. The lot for the existing dwell-
ing would have a width of 22 feet. The new Zoning Ordinance established standards
for lot width and frontage on a public street to help define neck lots. The
lot remaining for. °the_existing dwelling would be a neck'.lot. Mr.._Larsen.showed
a graphic illustrating the original conceptual development plan for the Edina
Highlands subdivision. The building site contemplated for the subject property
is shown near where the proponents propose the dwelling on the new lot. No
record or reason could be found why the the north part of Lot 22 was transferred
to Lot 23. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan contains several
policies regarding the subdivision of lots in.developed neighborhoods: 1) allow
further subdivisions of developed single family lots only if neighborhood char-
acter and symmetry are preserved, and 2) prohibit "neck Lot" subdivisions whereby
access to public streets is gained through narrow strips of land adjacent to
other lots. Staff believes that the location of the existing dwelling creates
the illusion of subdivision potential for the property. If the dwelling would
have been constructed where originally contemplated the illusion of subdivision
potential would not exist. Although the existing dwelling is in an undesire-
able location, the lot does presently comply with Ordinance standards. The pro-
posed subdivision would create a substandard lot which would damage the character
and symmetry of the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen submitted that although the lot is
exceptionally large, its small frontage prevents the division of the property
into two conforming lots. The additional property from Lot 22 does not contribute
to the ability.to subdivide. Further, staff can find no evidence that this
transfer was approved by the City. The proposed plat was considered by the
Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of October 30, 1985
and recommended denial for the reasons set out in the staff report: 1) the sub-
11/18/85
division would create a neck lot contrary to policies contained in the Compre-
hensive Plan, 2) the subdivision would create a substandard lot, and 3) the
subdivision would disturb the character and symmetry of the neighborhood.
Mr. Larsen commented that the proponent, Barbara Feiler, was not present. No
public comment was heard.. Mr. Erickson advised that the usual procedure in
matters like this is to authorize staff to prepare Findings of Fact for Council's
review in making a decision. Member Bredesen then moved that the staff be
directed to prepare Findings, Reasons and Decision for review by the Council
at its meeting of December 2, 1985. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION INC. (6224 INTERLACHEN
BOULEVARD). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval
for Developers Construction, Inc. Addition, advising that the subject property
is generally located north of Interlachen Boulevard and east of Blake Road. It
measures approximately 205 feet in width and 156 feet in depth and contains
31,300 square feet. The property is zoned R- 1.Single Dwelling District, and is
developed with two single dwelling units. Since the Zoning Ordinance allows
only one dwelling per lot in the R -1 zone the property is non - conforming. The
subject property is bounded on the east and north by Interlachen Country Club.
Single family dwelling are located to the immediate west and to the southeast
across Interlachen Boulevard.. Mirror Lake is located directly to the south.
Mr. Larsen stated that the proponents have submitted a preliminary plat which
would create two buildable lots following the demolition of the existing dwell-
ings. Lot 1 would be 105 feet in width and would contain 14,000 square feet.
Lot 2 would measure 100 feet in width and contain 17,300 square feet. Both new
lots would conform to Ordinance requirements. Also included in the plat is
Outlot A which was detached from the subject property by Interlachen Boulevard.
The marjority of the outlot is located within the lakebed of Mirror Lake. The
existing dwellings are connected to sanitary sewer which runs through the Inter-
lachen Club property to the north. However, the.units are not connected to
public water but are served by a private well. The right of way for Interlachen
Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property, is provided by an easement which
is narrower than necessary for the existing roadway. The proposed plat would
dedicate the required 66 foot wide right of way. Mr. Larsen pointed out that
the right of way must be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. The pro-
posed subdivision would eliminate the existing non - conforming condition and
would provide two conforming lots. The site is relatively isolated from neigh-
boring single family properties. It would seem to relate most to lots to the
north and northwest and the proposed lot sizes are similar to lots in that
neighborhood. The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the
plat at its meeting of October 20, 1985 and recommended preliminary approval
conditioned on: 1) execution of a developer's agreement for.the installation
of public water service to the properties, 2).subdivision dedication, and
3) approval by Hennepin County of the proposed right of way. The Commission
also discussed and recommended that one curb cut serve both properties.
Mr. Larsen informed the Council that the proponent has met with Hennepin County
and they have given preliminary approval on the location of the one-curb-cut.
No comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption, subject to the conditions in the staff report as outlined
and the one curb cut:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR DEVELOPERS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that -
certain plat entitled "Developers Construction, Inc. Addition ", platted by
Developers Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the
regular meeting of the City Council of November 18, 1985, be and.is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR FOUR WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATED LOADER. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for one four wheel drive articulated loader, showing Ziegler,
Inc. at $109,990.00 for Bid C (total cost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of
$66,500.00 /5.years for a net bid of $42,290.00 and showing Case Power & Equip-
ment at $81,213.00 for Bid C (total cost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of
$58,500.00/5 years for a net bid of $23,213.00. The bid submitted by Minneapolis
Equipment was incomplete and therefore was not considered. Mr. Rosland added
that staff has reviewed the bids and would recommend award of bid to Ziegler, Inc.
for the reasons outlined in the staff memorandum of November 15, 1985, which
11/18/85
pointed out that Case did not meet specifications on these items: cab mount,
quick coupler, steering, hydraulic system and alternator. Scheduled mainte-
nance costs were quoted at $2;821.98 for Caterpillar (Ziegler) vs. $5,817.50
for Case. Speaking in support of award of bid to Case were Gary Marshall,
5720 Susan Avenue, and Kevin Harrison, 4008 Grimes Avenue, an employee of Case.
Both commented that they felt the specifications were written for one type of
loader. In response, Mr. Hoffman pointed out that several other equipment
dealers could have met the specifications but chose not to submit total cost
bids. Following discussion, Member Turner moved award of bid to Ziegler, Inc.
at total cost bid of $102,490.00 (net bid of $42,490.00) based on the reasons
submitted by staff recommending purchase of the Caterpillar 950B Loader.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards.
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS FOR BRAEMAR CLUB HOUSE. Mr. Rosland recalled
that award of bids for the mechanical systems and the electrical work at Braemar
Golf Course Club House had been continued from the last meeting. Tabulation of
bids for plumbing, heating, ventilating, air conditioning and temperature control
systems were presented showing Bowler Company, Inc. at $164,036, Hoov -Aire, Inc.
at $173,343, All American Mechanical, Inc. at $186,265, General Sheetmetal at
$178,505 and Vogt Heating at $185,543. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by
Member Turner for award of bid for mechanical systems to recommended low bidder,.
Bowler Company, Inc. at $164,036.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Mr. Rosland reported that after reviewing the bids submitted for the electrical
work it is recommended that all bids be rejected. Motion of Member Richards was
seconded by Member Turner to reject all bids submitted for the electrical work.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR COMPUTER /PRINTER REPLACEMENT SYSTEM FOR PUBLIC WORKS VEHICLE
MANAGEMENT. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for replacement of the
computer and printer system for vehicle management Public Works showing On -Line
Computers (IBM -PC AT) at $6,075.00, On -Line Computers (Compag Deskpro 286) at
$6,400.00 and Moore Business Systems at $6,863.00. Motion of Member Bredesen
was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recommended low bidder,
On -Line Computers (IBM -PC AT) at $6,075.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 12, 1985, APPROVED. Mr. Hoffman
summarized the action taken by the Traffic Safety Committee on November 12,
1985, regarding traffic concerns on Gleason Road, south of Valley View Road,
which item was continued from the previous meeting. Reports showed that since
January 1, 1983, there.have been eight accidents north of Valley View Road and
four south of Valley View Road. Traffic counts show that Gleason Road is a
collector roadway and a license plate survey identified greater than 50% of
traffic being from the Edina area. Reports of speed surveys and a selected
enforcement project for Gleason Road south of Valley View Road showed that
of the 29 citations issued, 21 violators were found to live within one mile of
.the intersection. The Committee identified the downhill geometrics as being
the major problem and it was speculated that familiarity with the roadway might
cause the majority of violations committed by local residents. Three options
were suggested to correct the speed and safety concerns: 1) rigorous speed
speed enforcement, 2) signs and warning devices including centerline barrier,
and 3) redesign and re- engineering of the curved portion of the roadway.
Regarding the request for a 3 -way "STOP" at the intersection of Gleason Road
and Scotia Drive, Mr. Hoffman pointed out that the motion to recommend approval
failed on a vote'of 2 -2. The Committee is reluctant to install unwarranted
"STOP" signs to control speed and it was felt that "STOP" signs on steeply
graded.',roadways can in and of themselves become hazardous. It was felt that
the only possible warrant for a "STOP" sign might be the warrant of "special
circumstances." Speaking in favor of installation of a "STOP" sign were
Robert Miller, 6905 Gleason Road; Bill Hunchis, 7008 Gleason Road and Robert
Remund, 6825 Gleason Road. Speaking in opposition to installation of a "STOP"
sign was Don Ohlson, 7004 Gleason Road. It was also pointed out that the lack
of sidewalks and the roadway's narrow width presents a hazard to pedestrians,
especially school children. The main concern identified was vehicles out of
control due.to speed. Mr. Hoffman commented. that :SnDot could be requested to
conduct a speed study to see if the speed limit should be lowered, and that
a letter to the neighborhood residents regarding these concerns may make them
aware of the speeding problem. Member Kelly commented that she has been
11/18/85
concerned about the safety of the children who must use Gleason Road to walk
to school because of the lack of sidewalks and that she felt the letters would
help. Chief Swanson was asked to explain the warrant of "Special Circumstances."
He clarified that in this case it would include, serious accident, high speed
and restricted view. Mayor Courtney said he thought the Traffic Safety Committee
should do more study on the problem and then bring a recommendation to the Council.
help. Mayor Courtney said he thought the Traffic Safety Committee should do
more study on the problem and then .bring a recommendation back to the Council.
Member Bredesen said he felt the Council should resolve this now and that the
"STOP" sign should be tried. Member Bredesen then made a motion which was
seconded by Member Kelly to approve the following recommended action as listed
in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of November 12, 1985:
1) That "YIELD RIGHT OF WAY" signs be installed controlling northbound and
southbound traffic on Kellogg Avenue,
that 3 -way "STOP" signs be installed at the intersection of Gleason Road and
Scotia Drive based on the warrant of "Special Circumstances ", and to acknow-
ledge Section C of the Minutes. Member Richards said he could not support the
motion because he felt the "STOP" sign would cause a greater problem but that
he felt the letter should be sent out and then wait to see what happens until
next Spring. Member Turner indicated she supported the letter going out now
to make the neighbors aware of the problem, that the "STOP" sign not be installed
until in the Spring, that we ask MnDot to conduct a study to get the speed limit
lowered and that she would support moving up the construction of the sidewalks
for Gleason Road in the Capital Improvement Program which now are scheduled for
1994. Member Bredesen then amended his motion to reflect Member Turner's
comments and the amended motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Motion-carried.
1986 HOLIDAY SCHEDULE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES APPROVED. Mr. Rosland presented a
proposed schedule of 1986 holidays for City employees. He pointed that the
inclusion of the observance of Martin Luther King's birthdate on the third
Monday in January is a Federal /State mandated holiday and that in order to avoid
an increase in the number of days that City Hall is closed, staff is proposing
that the Goof Friday holiday be dropped from the schedule and that the number of
holidays remain at 11. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner
approving the following schedule of holidays for 1986:
New Year's Day (January 1) Veterans' Day (November 11)
Martin Luther King.Day (January 20) Thanksgiving Day (November 27)
President's Day (February 17) Day after Thanksgiving Day (November 28)
Memorial Day (May 26, 1986 Christmas Eve (December 24 - 1/2 day)
Independence Day (July 4) Christmas Day (December 25)
Labor Day (September 1) New Year's Eve (December 31 - 1/2 day)
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CITY HALL SPACE STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT PRESENTED. Bob Schoening, Chairman of the
City Hall Space Study Committee, expressed the thanks of the Committee to the
staff for their input in the Study. He then presented the Council with copies of
the Study and then reviewed the outline of the Study which covered the following
items: I. Analysis of Existing City Hall Facility, II. Estimation of Value of
Existing City Hall Facility, III. Alternative Sites for New City Hall Facility,
and IV. Summary of Recommendations and Conclusions. The recommendations were:
1) Hire a professional space planner to analyze the floor layout, integration of
departments, storage and filing needs, etc., 2) Upon receiving space planner's
recommendations, an estimate of expense to make the desired improvements (includ-
ing an addition to the building) should be completed, 3) The use of modern tech-
nology systems (i.e. record storage and microfilm, etc.) should be considered to
reduce on site storage requirements, 4) A study should be conducted to analyze
the vacation of Eden Avenue, and 5) The most viable alternative for relocation
would be the Grandview Area. If the costs to improve and update the existing
facility are greater than anticipated and the decision is made to vacate Eden
Avenue, then the potential cost to relocate would be significantly reduced. In
this event, a further analysis of the cost of the relocation to the Grandview
area should be undertaken. Mr. Schoening concluded by commenting that the Study
did not analyze the Public Works facility although the Committee did tour the
facility and there are parts that need some improvement. He identified and
thanked the members of the Committee consisting of David Sherman, Barb Foster,
June Schmidt and Kathy Christensen for their input. On behalf of the Council,
Mayor Courtney thanked the members of the Committee for their work on the Space
Study. Following some discussion, Member Richards suggested that in regard to
the specific recommendations in the Study that the Council should act on them
after allowing time to study and review them. Member Richards then made a
motion that this matter be placed on the Council Agenda for December 16, 1985.
ll/18/85
Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen who stated that he hoped that by that
date the Council would information from the space planners as to their
recommendations with estimated costs and timeframes, etc.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 12, 1986 SET FOR BOARD OF REVIEW. As recommended by
staff, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly setting May 12, 1986
at 5:00 p.m. as the hearing date for the Board of Review.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
1985 COUNCIL WORK PLAN PRESENTED. Mr. Rosland recalled that during the course
of its Strategic Planning process, the City Council identified three key issues
requiring study during 1986 and requested the staff to produce a work plan
providing a program for addressing these issues. He added that the work plan
has been drafted for the Council's review and suggested the matter be placed on
the Council Agenda for December 2, 1985 for discussion. It was informally agreed
that the Council would discuss the work plan on December 2, 1985.
ADVISORY BOARD /COMMISSION ATTENDANCE DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that on
several recent occasions some of the advisory boards and commissions have been
unable to operate because there was no quorum in attendance. Ordinance No. 162
provides for the automatic removal of members of boards and commissions who fail
to attend three consecutive meetings or who fail to attend any four meetings a
year. Mr. Rosland asked for the Council's direction regarding this problem.
Following some discussion, Member Richards made a motion to include Ordinance
No. 162 when sending out the letters to board /commission members prior to the
expiration of their terms as a.reminder of the attendance requirement and to
also give this information to new candidates. Motion was seconded by Member
Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
SPECIAL MEETING ON ACCESSORY USES SCHEDULED. Mr. Rosland reminded the Council
Members of the Special Council Meeting scheduled for December 9, 1985 at 7 p.m.
to discuss and study accessory uses regulated by ordinance. This will be an
informational meeting open to the public and will be posted as such.
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PROPOSED REVISED RULES DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
advised the Council that the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District will hold a public hearing on Thursday, November 21, 1985, on proposed
revised rules for the District and that Mr. Hoffman, City Engineer, will be
attending. Mr. Hoffman explained that the Board is currently preparing a Water-
shed Management Plan as required by Laws of Minnesota 1982', Chapter 509 and
anticipates that it will be completed during 1985. Municipalities will then
be required under Chapter 509 to prepare a municipal water management plan in
conformity with the District's Plan. Where such a municipal plan is adopted the
requirements of the District's rules which are met by the municipal plan shall
be deemed satisfied upon a showing of compliance with the municipal plan. In
such cases, individual site -by -site permits for developments in areas covered
by a municipal plan will not be-required for those matters where the municipal
plan satisfies these rules. Mr. Rosland said if the Council had any input re-
garding the proposed revised rules that they should contact Mr..Hoffman prior
to the hearing date. No action was taken.
INFORMATION ON HOW NEW FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT LAW AFFECTS CITY REQUESTED..
Member Kelly asked that the Council be given information on how the new Fair
Labor Standards Act law affects the City. Mr. Rosland responded that the pro
visions of the law and their effect on the City will be summarized for the
Council.
LETTER REGARDING INTERLACHEN BOULEVARD NOTED. Member Kelly referred to an
article in the Edina Sun - Current regarding Danny Berenberg's concerns for
children's safety on Interlachen Boulevard and asked if the City is going to
look into the matter. Mr. Hoffman responded that staff has been in contact
with the County engineers and has reiterated the City's position about improving
the roadway. He stated that he and Mr. Berenberg have met with the County in
the past and that we are still looking for funds to construct pathways, walkways,
and improvements to the roadway that would improve the safety for pedestrians.
The County engineers are responding to the Board of Commissioners on this issue
and staff is waiting for their answer. No action wag taken.
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE ADOPTED FOR KATHERINE SEHLIN. Member Kelly introduced
the following resolution of condolence on the recent death of Katherine Sehlin
and moved its adoption:
11/18/85
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
KATHERINE SEHLEN
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was a long time resident of the City of Edina and
was active in civic and community affairs, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin served on the Youth Commission that was instrumental
in the establishment of Edina High School, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin served as a member of the Human Relations Commission
for seven years, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was greatly concerned for the quality of life of the
aged, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was appointed and served on the Governor's Council on
Aging, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin represented the State of Minnesota at the White House
Conference on Aging in 1983, and
WHEREAS, Katherine Sehlin was active on various Senior Citizens Boards in
the metropolitan area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby extends its
heartfelt sympathy to the family of
KATHERINE A. SEHLIN
during this time of bereavement; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be entered into the pages
of the Minutes Book of the City of Edina and that a copy be presented to her
family.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner,_ Courtney
Resolution adopted.
STATUS OF BRUTGER DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONED. Member Kelly stated that she had received
several.telephone inquiries about.the status of the Brutger Development on Cahill
Road. Mr. Rosland responded that staff has heard nothing from Brutger and that
an attempt will be made to ascertain what their plans for construction are. No
action was taken.
HOMART DEVELOPMENT SETTLEMENT DISCUSSED. Member Turner asked if the Council
Members would get a final report on the settlement with Homart Development.
Mr. Rosland said that the minutes of the Special Meeting held on November 13,
1985, would be on the next agenda for Council approval and would reflect the final
settlement of the lawsuit. No action was taken.
AMM STUDY OF METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE REVIEW PROCESS DISCUSSED. Member Turner
reminded the Council that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM)
will be studying the Metropolitan Significance Review process which is conducted
by the Metropolitan Council for proposed developments that will affect the metro
area because they have had some concerns about the process in general. She asked
if the Council wants to be part of the AM1l study, especially after the City's
recent experience with the Homart Development. Member Richards said he felt the
Council should offer it's comments on the process and suggested it be discussed
at the next meeting.
EDINBOROUGH "GROUNDBREAKING" RECEPTION NOTED. Mayor Courtney stated that he was
very pleased with the Edinborough "Groundbreaking" reception held on November 15.
Member Richards commented that the developers have had 2,000 serious inquiries
over the weekend regarding the housing element of the project. No action was taken.
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR NOVEMBER 20. Mr. Rosland
said that the Municipal Legislative Commission is scheduled to meet on November 20,
1985, and that he and Member Richards will be attending to represent Edina.
EDINA SUN - CURRENT CENTERFOLD DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland reported that he has received
a cost estimate of..$700 for printing of an "Edina Centerfold" in.the Edina Sun -
Current and that he has discussed with the Edina Rotary their sponsoring of the
first two issues. It is hoped that other organizations will volunteer to sponsor
future issues. The first issue is scheduled for February, 1986. Mr. Rosland
said the regular Edina Newsletter would still be sent in January with the homestead
application mailing and that if the centerfold is well received we might consider
discontinuing the newsletter in the future. No action was taken.
PETITION FOR ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHT REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Upon
being advised that a petition has been received for installation of an ornamental
street light at the intersection of Chowen Avenue and Chowen Curve, Member
Richard's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to accept the petition and to
refer it to the Engineering Department for processing.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
11/18/85
1986 LABORATORY SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY APPROVED. Mr. Rosland
explained that Hennepin County will be contracting with the Minneapolis Health
Department and the City of Edina for laboratory service in 1986. This change
occurred because the City could not handle the increased volume of food samples
which were submitted for analysis last summer. He pointed out that the contract
with Hennepin County will be for a total cost not to exceed $3,500.00 for 1986.
This contract is $6,500.00 less than the 1985 contract and will primarily
provide residential well water testing services for County residents. Staff
would recommend approval of the contract for 1986 with the belief that the
reduced laboratory service demand is in the best interest of the City of Edina.
Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into Contract No. 60107 with the County
of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, whereby the County, through its Community
Health Department, agrees to make payments to the City of Edina for analytical
and microbiological laboratory support services, for the term from January 1,
1986 through December 31, 1986, not to exceed $3,500.00.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE /THANKS ADOPTED FOR GIFT OF LAND BY JESSIE BONN.
Mr. Rosland recommended that a resolution of acceptance and thanks be adopted
for the gift of land by Mrs. Jessie Bonn. Member Richards then introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION OF ACCEPTANCE AND THANKS OF GIFT
WHEREAS, Mrs.-Jessie D. Bonn has offered to give to the City of Edina a portion
of her property; and
WHEREAS, acceptance of this gift is in the best interest of Edina and will
further the general welfare of its citizens;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City of Edina accepts the generous
gift of land from Mrs. Jessie D. Bonn described as follows:
That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 32, Township 117, Range 21, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of IDYLWOOD THIRD ADDITION,
according to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed
bearing of East, along the north line of- IDYLWOOD SECOND ADDITION,
according to the recorded plat thereof, a distance of 187.10 feet
to the west line of CARSON' HILL; thence North 0 degrees 21 minutes
55 seconds East, along said west line, a distance of 224.03 feet;
thence North 89 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of
57.66 feet; thence South 0 degrees 57 minutes 48 seconds West, a
distance of 62.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 02 minutes 12 seconds
West, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence North 10 degrees 02 minutes
12 seconds West, a distance of 72.00 feet; thence North 82 degrees
02 minutes 12 seconds West, a distance of 90.14 feet to the east
line of said IDYLWOOD THIRD ADDITION; thence South 0 degrees 28
minutes 05 seconds West, along said east line, a distance of 246.84
feet to the point of beginning.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Council, on behalf of all the citizens
of Edina hereby express its sincere thanks to Mrs. Jessie D. Bonn.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for payment
of the following claims dated 11/18/85: General Fund $365,809.02, Art Center
$2,409.92, Swimming Pool Fund $86.75, Golf Course Fund $118,737.54,
Recreation Center Fund $1,809.99, Gun Range Fund $339.36, Utility Fund
$383,423.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $77,665.66, Construction Fund $189,999.17,
Total $1,140,361.87; and for confirmation of the following claims dated 10/31/85:
General Fund $134,950.23, Park Department $186.63, Art Center $500.07, Swimming
Pool Fund $3,469.96, Golf Course Fund $7,278.74, Recreation Center Fund $6,067.39,
Gun Range Fund $421.67, Utility Fund $24,857.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$223,423.43, Total $401,155.12.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared
the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
City Clerk
-...,
MINUTES OF SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 13, 1985
The Edina City Council met in special session
on November 13, 1985 at four o'clock p.m. in the offices
of Mr. Frederick S'. Richards, at 4344 IDS Tower, Minneapolis,
Minnesota. Council members in attendance were Leslie Turner,
Peggy Kelly, Fred Richards and C. Wayne Courtney. Also
in attendance were Ken Rosland, Fran Hoffman, Becky Comstock
from Dorsey & Whitney, and Tom Erickson, City Attorney,
also from Dorsey & Whitney.
The meeting was called to discuss possible settlement
of the lawsuit against Homart and of the Metropolitan
Significance Review instituted by Edina in connection with
the Homart Project. The Mayor opened the meeting and then
asked Tom Erickson to present the current status of settlement
negotiations. Mr. Erickson advised as follows:
1.. The agreement presented to the City Council
on November 12, 1985 was substantially the same as now
negotiated except for the following changes:
(a) Paragraph 4 has been changed to provide
that Homart's share of the cost of the turn lane
shall not exceed $40,000 and that the construction
of the turn lane shall include signalization.
(b) In Paragraph 9 the square footage in
the first three Phases is now stated to be "gross
floor area."
(c) Paragraph 11 relative to the I -494 corridor
study to be undertaken by the Metropolitan Council
now also provides that the study "shall include,
among other aspects, transportation improvements,
mass transit useage and land useage."
(d) There are also a number of other
insignificant nonsubstantive changes in the language
of the agreement.
2. There were three open issues: (1) to date
Edina has insisted that the agreement relative to the
restriction on construction of Phase IV (restricted by the
vehicle trips) should be of record, and thereby give notice
to owners of Phase IV. Homart has objected to that recording.
As an alternate, Edina has suggested that Bloomington adopt
a zoning and /or land use ordinance implementing the provisions
of the Settlement Agreement; that Bloomington also agree
- i --
to give notice to Edina of development plans for the Homart
site and not to approve any development plan or issue building
permits, except for Phase I, until the ordinance is effective.
Peter Coyle has advised us that Homart had approved this
concept and that Floyd Olson, city attorney, had approved
the concept, although neither had seen the exact language
that we proposed. Mr. Erickson asked for some direction
of Council as to whether they would accept the zoning ordinance
and remove any requirement that the agreements with Homart
be recorded.
3. The Settlement Agreement presently requires
that Bloomington initiate the traffic study by notice to
Metropolitan Council, and Metropolitan Council would then
see to the selection of a group of experts who would prepare
criteria, and those criteria would be used to complete the
traffic study after Phases I, II and III were complete and
occupied; on the basis of that study the Metropolittan Council
would determine the size of Phase IV. Homart wants to put
a time frame of 120 days or 180 days (the 180 -day figure
being our number) on this process so that Homart will be.
able to plan. We advised the Council that we had no objection
to the 180 or the 120 days so long as the parties to the
Agreement retain their rights and obligations notwithstanding
failure to comply with that deadline.
4. Mr. Erickson advised the City Council that,
based upon the direction given by the Council at the November 12
meeting, he asked Homart to pay the City Attorney's fees
and costs in the amount of $75,000. He advised that Homart
had refused. He then advised that he had not yet asked
the City of Bloomington to pay any of these costs. He has
not done so for fear that such a discussion, even if payment
of the cost was framed in terms of purchase of the north
half of the right -of -way of 77th Street, or especially if
such request was framed as a purchase of the right -of -way,
would lead to a request on the part of Bloomington for payment
by Edina of one -half the cost of 77th Street plus 100% of
the cost of the sewer to be installed with that street.
Therefore, he thought it best not to raise this issue at
this time, but should the issue come up in the future when
Bloomington decides to put in the road, Edina can always
request that Bloomington pay some part of its costs involved
in this matter in exchange for Edina agreeing to take on
some part of the cost of construction of the road and /or
sewer which in turn could be assessed by Edina against the
benefitted property owners (assuming, of course, a Joint
Powers Agreement or other activity on.the part of Edina
is taken in timely fashion so that the assessment can be
made). Mr. Erickson also advised that they had done some
research, and the research indicated that Edina was in a
- ii -
favorable position to prevent any road construction by
Bloomington which did not include an accommodation of the
drainage, either by an open swale or by a pipe.
After presentation by Mr. Erickson, the Council
members asked a number of questions and made a number of
comments on the Settlement Agreement. Thereafter motion
was made by Turner, and seconded by Richards, that (i) the
Settlement Agreement presented on November 12, 1985, with
the changes mentioned by Mr. Erickson, including the additional
nonsubstantive changes negotiated by the attorneys, and
including deletion of a recording requirement, and insertion
in lieu thereof of the Bloomington ordinance provisions,
and the insertion of a 120 -day study period for the traffic
study, provided that the parties do not lose their rights
and obligations should the study take longer than 120 days,
be approved, (ii) the City Attorney not seek any repayment
of attorneys' fees at this time in connection with the
Settlement Agreement, and (iii) the Mayor and Manager are
authorized to execute that Agreement with such additional
changes and modifications as the Mayor and the Manager may
deem appropriate, and the signature of the Mayor and the
Manager shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of
this Council to the terms and provisions of the Settlement
Agreement as signed.
The Mayor then called for the question, and the
Resolution was adopted 3 to 1, with Mr. Richards, Ms. Turner
and Mr. Courtney voting aye, and Ms. Kelly voting nay.
There being no further business to come before
the meeting, it was thereupon adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
- iii -
I
CITY OF EDINA
In the Matter of the Application of FINDINGS,
Barbara Feiler for a Subdivision of DECISIONS,
Lot 23 and the north 103.5 feet AND
of Lot 22, Edina Highlands (S- 85 -10) REASONS
The above entitled matter was heard before the City
Council on November 18, and December 2, 1985. Barbara
Feiler ( "Proponent ") was not present. The City Council,
having heard and reviewed all of the facts and arguments
presented by the Proponent, City staff and property owners
in the vicinity of the subject subdivision, and having heard
and reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent,
City staff, and property owners, and being fully advised,
after due consideration, hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Proponent, on September 24, 1985, submitted an
application for subdivision (the "Proposed Subdivision ") of
a 66,450 square foot parcel of land located at the
northeasterly end of the cul -de -sac in Duncraig Road. This
tract of land (the "Subject Property ") is platted property
(Platted in 1946), and is described as Lot 23, Block 1,
Edina Highlands, and the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22,
Block 1, Edina Highlands. An existing single dwelling unit
building is located in the north central portion of the
Subject Property. According to City records the Subject
Property is owned by Barbara Feiler.
2. The Proposed Subdivision delineated two, R -1,
single dwelling unit lots. Lot 1 of the Proposed
I
Subdivision, the lot which would include the existing
dwelling unit building, measured 35,698 square feet and Lot
2, the proposed new building site, measured 30,625 square
feet. These measurements are approximate since a boundary
survey by a registered land surveyor was not submitted with
the application for subdivision.
3. The Edina Community Development and Planning
Commission (the "Commission ") reviewed the Proposed
Subdivision at its October 30, 1985 meeting. Several
property owners from the vicinity of the Subject Property
were present, and two of the residents spoke in opposition
to the Proposed Subdivision citing issues of compatibility
with adjacent lots, terrain, decreased property value, the
character of the neighborhood, and existing deed
restrictions applicable to lots in the Edina Highlands plat.
The Proponent submitted that the new dwelling unit would be
built in the woods and would be screened by dense vegetation
from surrounding properties. The Commission voted to
recommend denial of the Proposed Subdivision for the
following reasons:
- The Proposed Subdivision would create a neck lot
contrary to policies contained in the Comprehensive
Plan.
- The Proposed Subdivision would create a substandard
lot.
. s
- The Proposed Subdivision would disturb the character
and symmetry of the neighborhood.
4. Edina Ordinance No. 825,( the "Zoning Ordinance ")
imposes the following minimum standards for single dwelling
unit lots:
Minimum Lot Area - 9,000 Square feet
Minimum Lot Width - 75 feet
Minimum Lot Depth - 120 feet
The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot Width" as follows:
"The horizontal distance between side lot lines
measured at right angles to the line establishing the lot
depth at a point 50 feet from the front lot line."
The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot depth" as
follows:
"The horizontal distance between the midpoint of
the front lot line and the midpoint of the rear lot line."
Lot 2, the new lot, of the Proposed Subdivision
would comply with the above standards. Lot 1, the lot for
the existing dwelling, would not comply with the standard
for lot width. Lot 1 would provide a lot width of
approximately 22 feet.
5. The Zoning Ordinance defines "Lot" as follows:
S
"The basic development unit for purposes of this
ordinance. A lot may consist of one parcel or two or more
adjoining parcels under single ownership or control, and
used for a principal use and accessory uses allowed by this
ordinance. A lot, except lots in a townhouse plat, must
have at least 30 feet frontage on a street other than a
limited access freeway."
Lot 1, the lot for the existing dwelling, would have a
frontage on the street of approximately 12 feet.
6. Edina ordinance No. 801, ( the "Platting
Ordinance ") states that the City Council, in approving
plats, shall consider, among other things, the suitability
of plats from the standpoint of community planning.
7. The Edina Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City
Council on December 12, 1981, states the following general
policies:
Allow further subdivision of developed single
family lots only if the neighborhood character and symmetry
are preserved.
- Prohibit "neck lot" subdivisions whereby access to
public streets is gained through narrow strips of land
adjacent to other lots.
I
- Require increased minimum lot sizes for single
family and two family dwelling lots with steep slopes.
8. The Zoning Ordinance provides for variances from
the requirements of the Ordinance, but only upon finding,
among other required findings, that the "plight of the
petitioner is due to circumstances unique to his property
which were not created by the petitioner,... and that the
grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and
intent of this ordinance."
9. The subject property exhibits areas with slopes
exceeding 30 percent.
10. Divisions of property must receive approval by
resolution of the City Council. There exists no record
indicating the approval of the addition of the northerly
103.5 feet of Lot 22 to Lot 23 of Edina Highlands.
THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing findings, the City
Council does hereby make the following:
mne- i c i nn
The application for the Proposed Subdivision by Barbara
Feiler of Lot 23 and the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22,
Edina Highlands is hereby denied.
The above decision is made for the following:
I
n -- --"n -
A. The Proposed Subdivision is contrary to policies of
the Comprehensive Plan concerning the further subdivision of
lots within developed single family neighborhoods. The
policies of the Comprehensive Plan must be considered in
deciding whether or not to approve Subdivisions.
B. Property owners in the vicinity of the Subject
Property should have the right to rely upon the recorded
plat entitled Edina Highlands and should rightly presume
that any modification or replatting of said plat will be
compatible with surrounding properties and that the
spaciousness and character of the Edina Highlands
neighborhood will be preserved.
C. Lot 1, the lot for the existing dwelling, would
require a variance for lot width and would require a
variance from the requirement that lots have a frontage of
at least 30 feet on a street. The need for variances is
solely created by the Petitioner's request for approval of
the Proposed Subdivision, and therefore, does not meet the
criteria established by the Zoning Ordinance for the
granting of variances; but approval of the Proposed
Subdivision would be implied approval of the variances.
D. Although the lots in the Proposed Subdivision are
similar in size to some lots in the vicinity, other factors,
including the unusual shape of the lots, the presence of
steep slopes, and the location of the existing dwelling
prevent development of Lot 2 without adversly impairing the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood.
E. The addition of the northerly 103.5 feet of Lot 22,
Edina Highlands to the Subject Property does not materially
add to the ability to subdivide-the Subject Property since
it presently serves as a visual rear yard for two existing
dwelling unit buildings, and should not be considered part
of the Subject Property since the division adding this
property to lot 23 was not approved by the City.
F. Approval of the Proposed
establish a precedent encouraging
large lots with similar facts and
adversely alter the character and
neighborhood contrary to the poli
Plan.
Subdivision could
the replatting of other
circumstances which would
symmetry of the
cies of the Comprehensive
0. s
ff'R
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION
OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
December 2, 1985, at 7:00 P.M., for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on the proposed vacation of the following easement for utility purposes:
Utility easement shown in the plat for Meadow Lane II Addition on
that part of Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition
lying westerly and southwesterly of the centerline of York Avenue
South.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or
not the above .proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the
area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects
the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes,
mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue
maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for
the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which
any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter
,upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella If. Daehn
City Clerk
tZOINaOROUGH ADDITION
W,
'o
A
0
01.
3
'2
2
%
nf L
M
c,� I 7r. 77,
43 =
55'0
BL"C'N I "T i
0.
z is
2692e\6
166
VL
RT DOG ;1
C.Ck,
R DO!, Na-_
SP
?a TH,
—,g---fi6G26
• WI M, IE
ST
'o
A
0
01.
3
'2
2
%
nf L
M
c,� I 7r. 77,
43 =
55'0
BL"C'N I "T i
0.
z is
2692e\6
166
VL
EEL 3 OF 3 SHEETS
SHEET 2 Of 3 SHEETS
Wol
ED'NBOROUG"- ADDITION
OF Eo:r.A
?a TH,
—,g---fi6G26
• WI M, IE
ST
sr
76 TH.
sr.
2
WEST 2
- r ----------
F
21,
•
2 r
----------------
31.
0
i%
T
10
01
p
4
ZlI
1,
EEL 3 OF 3 SHEETS
SHEET 2 Of 3 SHEETS
Wol
ai.Z A
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
IIA: Kenneth Rosland, City flanaver
SUBJECT: REgUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 28, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Snow P1ow'Cutting Edges*
(Hennepin County Bid)-.
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or aid
1• Paper Calmenson $5;453.47
2.
3.
Department P.ecormendation: Paper,Calmenson
$5,453.47
• ubl-ic Works - Street
Sign Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bi is is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
Ltj a&Q
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City naner's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recorrnendation of the Department and reconunend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: _
Kenneth Rosland,pity Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: �M.ayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Edina Park and Recreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 27, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Remodeling of Art Center basement restroom to wheel chair and handicap
use
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�. Peak Construction Co.
6103 Arctic Way, Edina, MN 55436
2. Crawford -Marz Const. Co.
2316 Fourth Ave. S.,.Mpls., Mn 55404
'. Lars Hassel Const.
Department Recommendation:
Peak Construction Co.
Finance Director's Endorsemer
The recon�riended bi d i s
y-3
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 8,675.
$ 8,900
$ 9,000
Department
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
ector
City naaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nnetn Hosland, City Manager
i k
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland DATE: November 25, 1985
FROM: Craig G. Swanson
SUBJECT: On -Sale Wine License
The. on -sale wine license application of the below establishment has been
investigated in accordance with applicable Statutes and ordinances:
Empress Restaurant
3335 Hazelton Rd.
Edina, MN 55435
The findings of these investigations do not reveal information that is
contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing.
Therefore, I recommend the, :Council move to approve the application and
issuance of an on -sale wine license for the establishment conditioned upon
approval by the State of minnesota. And, instruct the City Clerk to
forward the required documents to the State of Minnesota for their
approval.
CRAIG G SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: November 19, 1985
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Colleen Paulus, Sanitarian
SUBJECT: Approval of Wine Application
The Empress Restaurant located at 3335 Hazelton,Road has been
approved for the service of wine by the Edina Health Department.
The establishment was evaluated foi adequate storage space for
wine, glassware storage and the method of dispensing.
j'A
qk
jpp
=- B
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE PROCESS
DATE: November 27, 1985
The City Council plans to discuss the subject process on December 2, 1985,
with respect to Edina's recent experience with Homart. This memo will
summarize the process and, in staff's view, how it worked for Homart.
Summary of Process
The following summary is excerpted from a June 28, 1985, letter from Mr.
Erickson and Ms. Comstock.
Metropolitan Significance Review
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 473.173, the Metropolitan Council may make a
determination that the Homart Project is a matter of metropolitan significance
and suspend the commencement of construction for up to one year.
Under Minnesota Rules Chapter 5700, a metropolitan significance review may
be initiated by resolution of the local unit of government which is affected
by a proposed project, in this case the City of Edina. Information
accompanying the resolution must indicate why the project is deemed to be of
metropolitan significance and its effect on existing or planned land uses
or development of the initiator. The Chairman of the Metropolitan Council
will commence the review effective upon the receipt of the resolution if it
is determined that the request complies with the metropolitan significance
review requirements, is not in bad faith, presents arguable claims, and is
not exempt. The review period for metropolitan significance begins to run
from the effective date of the order issued by the Metropolitan Council and
terminates automatically on the 90th day thereafter, unless the period has
been suspended to allow the decision of another public agency which is
required by law to review the matter.
The Metropolitan Council Chairman will appoint a review committee of three
to seven members of the council, who may delegate their responsibilities for
portions of the review to a hearing examiner on their own initiative, or
following the request of any party. If the review is being conducted by
a hearing examiner, the proceeding will be in the nature of a contested
case and discovery will be available to the parties.
November 27, 1985
Kenneth Rosland
Page Two
If Bloomington has adopted a local comprehensive plan which has been
approved by the Metropolitan Council under the Metropolitan Land Use
Planning Act, the project will be determined to be of metropolitan
significance only if among other things, it has a substantial effect.on
existing or planned land use or development within a local governmental
unit other than the situs unit or the proposed matter is inconsistent
with those elements of the local comprehensive plan which are subject to
Council modification under the Act and would result in the utilization,
extension or expansion of a metropolitan system plan in conflict with any
metropolitan system plan or part thereof.
Following a public hearing, the review committee adopts a committee report
setting forth its findings and recommendations. The Council makes a final
determination and if it finds a matter to be of metropolitan significance,
may: (1) include a determination as to whether the procedure to amend a
metropolitan system plan should be instituted.to ensure consistency with
the proposed matter; and /or (2) issue an order suspending commencement of
construction for up to one-year, identifying conditions or modifications
to the project which would cause the Council to eliminate the suspension;
or (3) find the matter to be of metropolitan significance but inappropriate
for suspension or amendment.
The final determination of the Metropolitan Council, including the decision
of the Council not to commence metropolitan significance review, constitutes
a final decision of the Council for purposes of judicial review. The City
of Edina could seek judicial review of the final decision of the Metropolitan
Council.
Homart Experience
Edina's request to initiate a metropolitan significance review was accepted
by the Chair of the Metropolitan Council (the "Council ") who, thereupon,
commenced a review on October 3, 1985. A calendar was issued to.all parties
for this review which scheduled various meetings and hearings to be conducted
during the 90 -day review period. Shortly after commencement of the.review,
Homart requested that the Council consider their project as a "phased"
project and then exempt Phase I on the basis that it did not exceed the
thresholds mandating in a metropolitan significance review.
After the receipt of Homart's request, the Council's staff and the
significance review committee immediately focused on the so- called seg-
mentation issue and scheduled hearings to consider exempting Phase I of
the project. Although our settlement agreement pre - empted the segmentation
decision, we believe that the review committee would have decided in
Homart's favor.
Analysis
In my view, the Council's decision to consider the segmentation and exemption
issue was untimely and without foundation. The decision had the effect of
putting Edina on the defensive and requiring us to justify our petition which
November 27, 1985
Kenneth Rosland
Page Three
already had been accepted. Even if the Council's decision to segment this
issue was justified,-then that decision should have been considered at the
conclusion of the 90 -day review period rather than at the beginning. In
retrospect, the Council should have, perhaps, scrutinized our petition
more closely prior to commencing the review. Even though we felt our
petition was justified, the process would have been better served if the
basic decision concerning segmentation was made before the review was
commenced.
Issues that the A. M. M. may wish to consider are the thresholds which must
be exceeded to commence a review and the powers that the Council has upon
finding that a development is of metropolitan significance. As to the latter,
the Council is not empowered to mandate change in a project; it can, at most,
delay a project for one year. This is a very powerful tool that would likely
have the effect of causing modifications in the project. However, the
Council is reluctant to use this authority; e.g. the Council has already
indicated that they will not delay the megamall, even before the hearings
are concluded.
In my view, the published rules of the metropolitan significance review
process are understandable and fairly reasonable. The Council, however,
has-to come to grips with its role in the process. The Council is too
interested in performing a mediation function rather than a fact finding
function that results in an independent analysis and judgment.
GH /sw
Icity of
Bloomington, minnesota
Municipal Building • 2215 West Old Shakopee Road • Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 -9971 • (612) 881 -5811
November 25, 1985
The Honorable C. Wayne Courtney
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Enclosed for your information is a copy of Resolution No. 85 -229,
which was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Bloomington on November 18, 1985.
This Resolution directs City of Bloomington staff to review the
impacts of development and proposed development in the City of
Minneapolis upon the metropolitan region.
If you have any questions regarding this Resolution, please do not
hesitate to contact our office.
E. L. Woulfe, CMC
City Clerk
cr
Enclosure
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: (612) 887 -9677
j!%
;i►
RESOLUTION NO. 85 - 229
A RESOLUTION DIRECTING CITY STAFF TO
REVIEW THE IMPACTS OF DEVELOPMENT AND
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF
MINNEAPOLIS UPON THE METROPOLITAN REGION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Bloomington is the official
governing body of the City of Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.1731, as amended, the
Metropolitan Council has adopted and put into effect regulations establishing
standards, guidelines, and procedures for determining whether any proposed matter
is of metropolitan significance; and
WHEREAS, the legislative policy embodied in the regulations, as stated in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.173, Subd. 29 "shall be to promote the orderly
and economic development, public and private of the metropolitan area" and to
provide project reviews to ascertain the impacts and relationship to policy
statement goals and policy plans of the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, metropolitan significance review includes, among other things,
examination of systems related to transportation, sewers, airports, housing and
economic and fiscal analyses of the proposed projects; and
WHEREAS, more than 14 million square feet of private office space have been
developed in downtown Minneapolis; in addition, nearly 1.5 million square feet of
new and renovated office space is currently under construction in Minneapolis'
central business district, including Lincoln Center (to be built in two 685,000
square foot phases), the International Centre Phase I and II (which will contain
5801000 square feet), International Center Phase III, Radisson Plaza 7 (which
will include 330,000 square feet of office space in a mixed -use development also
containing a 354 room Radisson Hotel and retail space), and Century Plaza (a
1
conversion project which will include 260',000 square feet of office space); and
WHEREAS, other proposed projects include Cowles Media Printing Plant (a two
phase 350,000 square foot industrial plant), Norwest Center (consisting of
approximately 1.53 million square feet), MCC II (consisting of 1.28 million
square feet of office and retail space), Northwestern National Life Insurance
office building (consisting of approximately 500,000 square feet), and additional
retail estimated to be approximately 800,000 square feet; and
WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis proposes a Convention Center complex of
approximately 1.67 million square feet, including a new convention center hotel;
and
WHEREAS, the La Societe Generale Immobilier (LSGI) has proposed a 1,000,000
square foot shopping complex; and
WHEREAS, while approximately 5,000,000 square feet of new development is
proposed within the City of Minneapolis, it has not produced a coordinated
evaluation of such development and its cummulative impacts upon the region; and
WHEREAS, regional highway and sewer facilities serving this proposed
development are already over capacity or operating in non - compliance with federal
law; and
WHEREAS, the City of Bloomington has been and will continue to be impacted
on Interstate I -35W by continued over -use and congestion at all bridges and
intersections within the City of Bloomington; and
WHEREAS, it is not known what effects increased concentration of development
within the City of Minneapolis may have upon the regional sewer system, airports,
housing and retail sales throughout the Metropolitan Area; and
WHEREAS, metropolitan significance review should oe commenced to ascertain
how concentrated Minneapolis plans to develop its central business district, to
ascertain what impacts such plans will have on all surrounding cities and
regional systems since the Minneapolis Zoning Ordinance does not appear to limit
2
_. • 1 .
the intensity of development in downtown Minneapolis; and
WHEREAS, it appears to the City of Bloomington that a phenomenon is
occurring which can be characterized as the over - concentration of development in
the central business district of downtown Minneapolis; and
WHEREAS, no current evaluation has been prepared to demonstrate what
mitigating factors and limitations should be utilized to prevent further adverse
impacts upon the vitality and development of the cities and counties surrounding
the City of Minneapolis.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the staff of the City of Bloomington is
directed to review and prepare analyses-for the purpose of considering initiation
of a metropolitan significance review of the cummulative effects of the over-
building of the Minneapolis central business district in the City of Bloomington;
and
The City Manager of the City of Bloomington is authorized to enter into such
arrangements and contracts with cities and counties for the purpose of reviewing
and preparing studies, reports and analyses to determine the regional impacts
upon metropolitan systems, and to take such other and further measures as are
necessary to alleviate the adverse impacts such over - building in the City of
Minneapolis may have upon the City of Bloomington.
Passed and adopted this 18th day of November , 1985.
ATTEST:
Secretary to the Council
Fj
yo
i'r
w
V-
November 25, 1985
TO: Mayor and City Council
1�7
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer!
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: County Road 18 East Ramp /Londonderry Road Intersection
Traffic Signals
Attached are the resolutions necessary for plan approval and agreement for par-
ticipation in construction of traffic signals at the above listed location.
The estimated city participation is $34,200.00 with $17,100.00 being a regular
state aid funding; $17,100.00 being also a state aid funding with a resolution
necessary to expend it on the County Road system.
Hennepin County will fund $34,200.00 as is their normal participation at
freeway ramps.
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolutions and an additional
resolution to expend an estimated $17,100.00 on the County Road system from
our Municipal State Aid Funding.
FJH:1m
r
r+
-w O
HENNEPIN
Ll U
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
320 Washington Av. South __
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 �'NES
935 -3381
TTY 935 -6433
November 14, 1985
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota, 55424
CSAH 18 AT LaMONDERRY DRIVE
COUNTY PROJECT 8420
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Submitted are one set of plans, two copies of an agreement, and a sample
copy of a resolution approving plans for the above referenced traffic
signal project, for which arrangements are being made to call for bids.
If the agreement is satisfactory, please have both copies signed by the
appropriate city officials and return them to this office. Upon
completion of the remaining signatures by County officials, we will send
you one fully executed copy for your files. Also, ulease return_a _
certified copy of the resolution authorizing the mayor and manager to "
sigma le agree.
A resolution approving plans must be passed by your City Council prior
receipt of bids.
We will be happy to review the plans or the agreement with you if you
have any questions.
We are hoping to receive bids on this project prior to January 1, 1986"
and your early attention will be appreciated.
Sincerely,
Theodore J. H , P.E.
Chief Design Engineer
WGM =mak HENNEPIN COUNTY
Enclosure
an equal opportunity employer
ti
At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota,
the following resolution was moved and adopted:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8420 showing proposed
traffic control signal installation at County State Aid Highway No. 18 and
Londonderry Drive, within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project,
have been prepared and presented to the City.
NOW, MEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things
approved.
Dated this day of
State of Minnesota
County of Hennepin
City of Edina
, 19 .
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the
day of , 19 , as disclosed by the
records of said City in my possession.
(SEAL)
City Clerk
At a duly authorized meeting of the City Council of Edina, Minnesota,
the following resolution was moved and adopted:
D T7 CAT TTT T AW7
WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8420 showing proposed
traffic control signal installation at County State Aid Highway No. 18 and
Londonderry Drive, within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project,
have been prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, That said plans be in all things
approved.
Dated this 2nd day of.December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct
copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of
Edina at a meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the
2nd day of December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in
my possession.
City Clerk
1
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that is hereby
approves the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement
now existing and entered into between the Cities of Edina, Eden Prairie,
Minnetonka, Richfield and Hopkins, Minnesota, to create the Southwest Suburban
Cable Commission;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and
authorized to execute the First Amendment for the City of Edina.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy
of a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a
meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of
December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation 'in the construction and operation of
traffic control signal system on.County State Aid Highway No. 18 at
Londonderry Drive, Hennepin County Project No. 8420, Agreement No. PW 26 -11 -85
_has been _prepared and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS'RESOLVED, that said Agreement be in a111:"things approved.
7 r BE -IT'FURTHER- RE SOL_ VED, 'than
the'-Mayor and'Manager are authorized to sign
Agreement No. 26-11-85, H nnepin -- County=- Project No-:
°8420. °
ADOP-TED.this.2nd dayof December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a
meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of December,
1985, as disclosed by the :records of said City in my possession.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS
TO. C.S.A.H. PROJECT
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisible and necessary for the City of Edina to
participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 18
within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of
Highways and identified in its records as 27- 618 -54, M.S.A.P. 142 - 128 -05,
M.S.A.P. 120 - 161 -02, 120 - 020 -18;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our
Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $17,100,00 to apply toward the
construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to
approve this authorization.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
a resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of Edina at a
meeting thereof held in the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of
December, 1985, as disclosed by the records of said City in my possession.
City Clerk
DATE: November 1, 1985
�P1N C
TO: All Commissioners r %
HEPIN FROM: Kay Mitchell, Clerk of the Board ,'�
N.E 9� P
SUBJECT:MEMBER AT LARGE APPOINTMENTS - 1986
As required under Resolution No. 77 -2 -126 and 77- 2 -126R
and amended under Resolution 80 -6 -571, attached is the
annual list of all Member -at -Large appointments that are
due to expire in 1986.
jc
Attach:
cc: Ted Farrington
Dale Ackmann
Chuck Sprafka
Bob Rohl f
Jim Kemp
Mel Si®e1, Sec. Water Resources
Fred Richards, Attorney - Watershed Districts
Sue Zuidema
Phil Eckhert
Various Municipalities
Tom Johnson
1
1986 SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
MEMBERS AT LARGE
TERM
COMMITTEE /BOARD
INCUMBENTS
LENGTH
ENDING
------------------------------------------
OF TERM
JANUARY
CORRECTIONS ADVISORY BOARD
Sig Fine
2
1/2/86
years
Tom Lavelle
Bruce Sabatke
Mary Jo Reiter
Dan Cain
Gerald Kaplan
Joanna Buzek
Raymond Skinaway
JANUARY
1/2/86
PERSONNEL BOARD
W. William Bednarczyk
4 years
Gene Neuman
JANUARY
1/31/86
LIBRARY BOARD
Eris Lundin Young
3 years
David Scott Benton
Raymond O'Connell
FEBRUARY
MENTAL COMMITMENT ATTORNEY
Thonmas Tinkham
2 years
2/28/86
PA14EL ADVISORY BOARD
Susan Lentz
Wallace Salovich
Sharon Burkhardt
Vacant
MARCH
MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED
Camille Andre
3 years
3/8/86
DISTRICT BOARD
Jim McWethy
MARCH
3/22/86
LOWER MN RIVER WATERSHED
DISTRICT
Russell Sorenson
3 years
BOARD
JULY
RILEY PURGATORY -BLUFF CREEK
Frederick Rahr
3 years
7/30/86
WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD
AUGUST
COMMUNITY ACTION FOR SUBURBAN
Donald Genereau
1 year
8/20/86
HENNEPIN BOARD (CASH)
Gloria Johnson
John Hamilton
Vacant
Mary Leintz
Dan Ryerson
SEPTEMBER
9/29/86
NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED
DISTRICT
Aileen Kulak
3 years
BOARD
Helen McClelland
DECEMBER
12/31/86
AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION C'TEE
Clarissa Walker
3 years
J.. Albert Oster
6 w
HERBST & THUE, LTD. J
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Chairman Miller
Southwest Operating Committee
FROM: Gary R. Matz
DATE: November 15, 1985
RE: Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement
Attached hereto please find an amendment to the Joint and
Cooperative Agreement as recommended by the full Commission.
An amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement must be
approved by all five member cities. The Agreement provides that
an executed copy of the amendment together with a certified copy
of the authorizing resolution be filed with the chairman of the
Commission.
GRM:cr
Enc.
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
This First Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement,
made and entered into this day of
198 , by and between the CITIES OF EDINA, EDEN PRAIRIE,
MINNETONKA, RICHFIELD and HOPKINS, MINNESOTA, constitutes the
First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement
now existing and entered into by each of the above Cities to
create the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission; and this First
Amendment is made to record the agreements by each of the Member
Cities and in consideration of the mutual promises of each of the
Member Cities:
1. Article XI, Financial Matters, Section 4, Contribution
for Subsequent Years is amended to read as follows:
Section 4. Contribution for Subsequent
Years. Beginning in the calendar year 1986
and for each year thereafter, each Party
shall contribute Two Thousand Five Hundred
s
contributions an
amount which bears the same ratio to the
total budget as that Party's franchise fees
received for the period ending August 31 of
the year prior to the year for which such
budget has been prepared bears to the total
franchise fees received for such prior period
by all of the Parties combined, or such other
amount or ratio as is agreed to by all of.the
Directors by August 1 of the year prior to
the year for which such budget has been
prepared and approved by the Council of each
Party. However, in any event, no Party's
contribution shall exceed the franchise fees
received in such prior year by such Party.
- 1 -
2. The Cities hereby expressly agree that all of the other
terms and conditions of said Joint and Cooperative Agreement
remain in full force and effect and are not affected by the terms
and conditions of this First Amendment except as explicitly
provided herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Cities hereto have caused this First
Amendment to Joint and Cooperative Agreement to be duly executed
the date first above written.
CITY OF MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA
By
Its:
By
Its:
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By
Its:
By
Its:
- 2 -
I:AEH:SW6
CITY OF HOPKINS, MINNESOTA
By
Its•
By
Its:
CITY OF RICHFIELD, MINNESOTA
By
Its:
By
Its:
CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE, MINNESOTA
By
Its:
By
Its:
- 3 -
RT?.g0T.77TT0N
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that it hereby
approves the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement
now existing and entered into between the Cities of Edina, Eden Prairie,
Minnetonka, Richfield and Hopkins, Minnesota, to create the Southwest
Suburban Cable Commission;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and
authorized to execute the First Amendment for the City of Edina.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of December, 1985.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
:.
THOMSEN,NYBECK,JOHNSON,BOUQUET 61 VAN VALKEN BURG, F.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 102
7250 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
_jjt�-- A
GLENN G.NYSECK
MINNEAPOLIS IEDINAI,MINNESOTA 66433
OF COUNSEL
GORDON V.JOHNSON
10121 835 -7000
HELGE THOMSEN
JOHN K. BOUOUET
RICHARD D. WILSON, P.A.
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
JACK W.CARLSON
MARK G.OHNSTAD
STEVEN J.OUAM
DONALD D. SMITH
ROBERT E.2ECK
DENNIS M. PATRICK
MARSH J. HALBERG
November 13, 1985
MARK E. LASES
JOHN R. PRAETORIUS
Mr. George Hite, Chair
Edina School Board
4720 Aspasia Circle
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Gentlemen:
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney,
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Sometime earlier this year your respective Boards approved
the Resolution that I am enclosing in concept.
Glenn Smith and I have now gone over the Resolution and
have put it into language that I think is acceptable to each of
you and I should advise you that it is to the Foundation.
The purpose and intent is stated in the first part of the
Resolution and the specific language in the second part.
There is some language there that has been carried forward
referring to the various Sections of Internal Revenue Code from
the original document and beyond that we have attempted to shorten
and simplify the same.
I wish you would take it before your respective Boards and
advise me as to the date of approval by your respective Boards so
that we can put this matter away as a completed item.
My records indicate that the School District approved this at
their meeting of July 8, 1985 (Volume 57, Report 17) and I do not
have the exact date of the City Council's approval and do not know
as they passed a specific Resolution as I appeared before the Council
to obtain that okay.
Regards to you both.
JVV:jd
Encl.
cc: Dr. Roberta Block
Yours truly,
James Van Valkenburg
11 -12 -85
PPrZn1 IITTf1N
WHEREAS The Edina Foundation, on November 7th 1985, did reaffirm
its position regarding membership and appointment thereto of the Board of
Directors.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that it is the intention of The Edina
Foundation that its members be selected as follows:
1. Three (3) to be appointed by the Chair of the Edina
School Board with the advice and consent of the Edina
School Board.
2. Three (3) to be appointed by the Mayor of Edina with
the advice and consent of the Edina City Council.
3. Three (3) to be appointed as members at large by the
six (6) appointed in one and two above.
WHEREFORE, it be further resolved that the Article III, Section
3.02 of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation be amended to state:
"That Section 3.02 'Number, Qualification and Term
of Office' of the By -Laws be amended as follows:
Section 3.02: Number, Qualification and Term of Office.
The number of directors shall be nine (9). The
number of directors may be increased or decreased
to any odd number, but not less than three (3) by
vote of the Board of Directors of the corporation,
but any change in.the number of Directors shall
receive the approval, by Resolution, of the City
Council of the City of Edina and the School Board
of Independent School District # 273 before such
change becomes effective.
The Directors currently serving, their terms, and
entity appointing them are as follows:
-2-
A. School Board of Independent School District # 273:
1. Kay Bach 1986
2. Marilou Birkeland 1987
3. Glenn C. Smith - 1988
B. City Council of the City of Edina:
1. Robert Sherman 1986
2. James Van Valkenburg 1987
3. John Skagerberg 1988
C. Appointed by the Directors of The Foundation:
1. Lyle Bing 1986
2. Betty Hemstad 1987
3. R. Bruce Kobs 1988
All subsequent directors shall be appointed or reappointed for
three (3) year terms.
Each Director shall hold office until the third annual
meeting of the meeting of the members next following his
or her selection, or election, and until his or her
successor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until
he or she shall have been removed in a manner hereinafter
provided.
If the number of Directors is hereafter increased to more
than nine (9), or decreased to less than nine (9), the
selection of such members shall be as provided in that
Resolution and accepted by the City Council and School
Board as above required.
No person shall be eligible to serve more than ten (10)
consecutive years as a Director of this corporation,
and upon completion of a period of service as a Director
of this corporation, a person may not again serve as a
Director within one year.
,l
i
-3-
Persons who would be described in Section 4946 (a) (1) (A)
or (C) through (G) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954,
as now enacted or as hereafter amended, if this corporation
were a "private foundation" as defined in Section 509 (a) of
the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as hereafter
amended, shall never constitute more than one -third of the
Directors of this corporation; and such persons, together
with representatives of banks or trust companies which serve
as trustees, investment advisors, custodians, or agents for or
with respect to funds of or held for the benefit of this
corporation, shall never constitute more than one -half of the
Directors of this corporation.
The six (6) Directors appointed by the School Board Chair and
the Mayor shall be residents of the City of Edina. The other
three (3) Directors appointed by the remaining six (6) Directors
shall either live or be employed in the City of Edina.
1ZVgOT TTTTOM
WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation Board of Directors on November 7, 1985, did
reaffirm its position regarding membership and appointment thereto of the Board
of Directors; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of The Edina Foundation that its members be
selected as follows:
1. Three (3) to be appointed by the Chair of the Edina School Board
with the advice and consent of the Edina School Board.
2. Three (3) to be appointed by the Mayor of Edina with the advice
and consent of the Edina City Council.
3. Three (3) to be appointed as members at large by the six (6)
appointed in one and two above.
WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation has further resolved that Article III,
Section 3.02 of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation be amended as follows:
"Section 3.02. Number, Qualification and Term of Office. The number.of
directors shall be nine (9). The number of directors may be increased
or decreased to any odd number, but not less than three (3) by vote of
the Board of Directors of the corporation, but any change in the number
of Directors shall receive the approval, by Resolution, of the City
Council of the City of Edina and the School Board of Independent School
District Number 273 before such change becomes effective.
The Directors currently serving, their terms, and entity appointing
them are as follows:
A. School Board of Independent School District Number 273:
1. Kay Bach 1986
2. Marilou Birkeland 1987
3. Glenn C. Smith 1988
B. City Council of the City of Edina:
1.
Robert Sherman
1986
2.
James Van Valkenburg
1987
3.
John Skagerberg
1988
C. Appointed by the Directors
of The Foundation:
1.
Lyle Bing
1986
2.
Betty Hemstad
1987
3.
R. Bruce Kobs
1988
All subsequent directors shall be appointed or reappointed for three (3)
year terms.
Each Director shall hold office until the third annual meeting of the
members next following his or her selection, or election, and until his
or her successor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until he or she
shall have been removed in a manner hereinafter provided.
No person shall be eligible to serve more than ten (10) consecutive
years as a Director of this corporation, and upon completion of a
period of service as a Director of this corporation, a person may
not again serve as a Director within one year.
Persons who would be described in Section 4946(a)(1)(A) or (C) through
(G) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as
hereafter amended, if this corporation were a "private foundation" as
defined in Section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as
now enacted or as hereafter amended, shall never constitute more than
one -third of the Directors of this corporation; and such persons,
together with representatives of banks or trust companies which serve
as trustees, investment advisors, custodians, or agents for or with
respect to funds of or held for the benefit of this corporation, shall
never constitute more than one -half of the Directors of this corporation.
The nine (9) Directors shall be residents of Edina."
WHEREAS, Article XIII of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation provides that
no amendment of Section 3.02 shall be made without the approval, by resolution,
of both the School Board of Independent School District Number 273 and the City
Council of the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that it hereby approves the amendment to Section 3.02 as stated heretofore; and
BE FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Edina
Foundation for inclusion in its corporate records.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal this 3rd day of December, 1985.
City Clerk
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
REPORT NO:
PI421101
RUN DATE: 10/09/85
IP
SC TWP RG QQ SFX/
10
PREVIOUS OWNER/DESCRIPTION
PROPERTY ADDRESS LOT
BLK
BLDG
WT
JUDGEMENT
32- 117 -21 41 0095 025
VALUE
VALUE
EDINA
33- 117 -21 31 0058 002
001
CHARLES F LEEFELDT ET AL
5008 BENTON AVE
07/16/85
100
"WARDEN ACRESP HENNEPIN COUNTYv
19- 028 -24 12 0150 013
014
5529 BROOKVIEW AVE
'HAT PART OF LOT 25 LYING E OF RR R/W
TOTAL NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS BY MUNIC 3
STATE LAND DEPT
/ /
04/17/85
800
" EDINA RIDGE"
IX HWY
T L B NELSON ETAL
05/19/76
06/26/85
60.600
880900
"SOUTH HARRIET PARKP HENNEPIN COUNTY
MINN."
r
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM
REPORT NO:
PI421101
,LIST OF FORFEITED PROPERTY
PAGE
10
PREVIOUS OWNER/DESCRIPTION
DATE OF
DATE OF
BLDG
WT
JUDGEMENT
FORFEITURE
VALUE
VALUE
EDINA
CHARLES F LEEFELDT ET AL
05/19/82
07/16/85
100
"WARDEN ACRESP HENNEPIN COUNTYv
IRINN."
'HAT PART OF LOT 25 LYING E OF RR R/W
STATE LAND DEPT
/ /
04/17/85
800
" EDINA RIDGE"
IX HWY
T L B NELSON ETAL
05/19/76
06/26/85
60.600
880900
"SOUTH HARRIET PARKP HENNEPIN COUNTY
MINN."
-- w M rT9', �. EAT 409.20 N .r20.46 -As
t Y_ 89
z: s- W120 5p7c'"lIZZ53" 75 145.6 - .5 m,4 33
Q i o W 'V 9Z. �Y' N ��,tti _ W `^ `� N °i� , J ,3 • W , = 7 fT�
d 2 :. Q; W 1 4 Iz N,, o M 2 N - -�— °� 3 O d o 0 .40 ° 3 tz0 X8 9 , °6.bT
SJ' ;_ c� 1qA) (9S7 o > f 35 g9.2Q = � � �:0 46 j,7 � � W 0AN [A ; . ;7046 a'Q3?8 ' , S s8�ztw -29r Z ^A�
s e LY E"
rd
Z8 ZI
PDN f �7 .3 a� ' 145 a IaS. 6 ' iG5 s7 14
let
4
,MVe, r IK�. �% °�i 5.5Z iY d 4%
of 49 s�gB�N ti
145.6 Ea1i �� J
W s Z
• o
ACRES
11 r �Cd
/.�o)`� 1 .� ,.: F. �. , 3 ��;,. ��; •a
RE�A f fL3.1L �a•
rt` r dz �i.2a6 _ =�S Ea flaai f4 .4G rQ5.52 ? Q - a� 3 >.. ,
-14 l9 )i3� 9i.j2 .N a 0 30
� [ },
�- j' c • _ a 1 l �(¢� ''.e 4 - �, /� p
�z 1, io �a O I Y1 _.� eT V N �•1; I5 .1` N 2.., a v: - �r�st i:•'qi �'
15 k 30 j r 1 !v O: m5B °•3tdC "W +76 r . r 'x;,y+ `.�"
STCOUNJRYSIDE RD 4.+4). 1 r,
rj
.. - tiE
1 A T
(2, CZ'! 2A) �yo
ST + �� S'�K ��, rSS' v H) ' <64 ?p.
o' i23q• n7o },y0 IiSo _ }40 � �. - �-- a - i�e7 •.
-��' , g � - ��� . � }_t T . Ii a �N ''13 • z ,\ �a s � o ,
- A t5
12 -10 " �S) 999 `{ �S Y Z
J
Z (ZDI '$` . ��, �'�• IZ.:, oI �s N .T�.a � e 4.
�5
3 5 a•
lz
OL
� yx
.• C
li.!
r U1 }
•
cc '
r
2 -31
UP. . ..... ZiAl Flo
m
N. I
.
R
Alo.
134.5 301
2 of legs e
. ,*; .1 2 C IN, Di� 2 4 @6*� 0
is
13 0
700 - A%
ot T2
LA
130
lzo 3
!�E AVE
4 64
--6
loo IN. 5
L
5)
.
7
Of
w -W
—)35
-fto
8 - -0 , .7
130
>I 0
SQU
2 3
AO
i AS spa S
LPAE LY�4:
0 1 CLQVt
7
LM 11
AM z
Gko Aus
11 : f . 1 2
6
�jA
S.
ifYVJUA E
--AVE-
&;,,
zo.
0
le)
\11
23 :12 0 21 20
(.0
713-11
i.�-Al
,
4
3-
12
L.4
U)
A
L
u 15(.6
U)
Ito
3.1
1 75
GO
2 Cl,) .
aci
lo r
4n
Z
0
�olLA
ao
OD
m
dk
11 0 -
9
w
A)
41
m
9
ce Ln
5
Sol
Sze
6 C(l)
--AVE-
&;,,
zo.
0
le)
\11
23 :12 0 21 20
�1� I AN
IRCHCREST
.0
!4L
,
3-
12
4
A
L
u 15(.6
lo
�1� I AN
IRCHCREST
i a,
3'
4
lo
9
3.1
1 75
GO
i a,
Ir i N2.55
1101,19 0
2 (io
151 `D
a �19
2r �o
135.14
� 135.14
61
133.6T�
!33.2,
I .t1
135 i}V_
13 . P.
18
1:133Ld
3
1T '
134.
wt -5
1�5
133 64
W
Q
135 t4
15.
W
Q
17 -
41.
, f�l 17
4 ��►i :
'�
(11.11'),
.e
IS3 G
. i 36
` 135.;
t35
S �5�1� .
fyp� 16
`
S
_
. ?? 5"
133.•
r3 .J1
t 0
ells
6
t3.54 '
I
a 504
135. A4
,r vd
->
�jA� 14 ,
_ 7` It,
!4
'
7
DG
•f 1 e t to
131
13
43
I
;CV1� 13. ,
`13
.,8
h
ii loo
4
13.4
64
1 32
9 �31.
, �A 17,
9 1:
a
or
` 11414
All
IDY.
�^A c
1"
0
2tl�
`D 35.1 '°:
151 `D
�
;�p� 16
C 134.14
135.14
� 135.14
�32) 17
1 4
!33.2,
,� °116 =•.,
��,,�►�:
13 . P.
t33.2
15(3°): 6 �Z1
6.��O1
134.
5
1�5
i '
,(23) 3
e 3
•� �e 5l
(21) 1Z
12 z
�� 35.1
113L 14
9
I
154 114
1 4
.134. v
(11.11'),
.e
, to
. i 36
2 yo3
IN
135 04 " •,
i4
12 •. yr0 - o
ll44
oll�•t!0 %N"I 1O 910
t00
th S W
t� M _
s
4�• os<
..4 (A011 . 4T
� .
2 _ r01
7
5
t G.8 6 fi o t
4
g b I
9
.2 0),
� 1 v
11114
q�ii3g.3
l
'i3i?��
;�p� 16
C 134.14
5 ti-al.
Cam, 17 <
4,��.
1331.
!33.2,
,� °116 =•.,
��,,�►�:
3 q
t33.2
�)IS'
6.��O1
134.
lh� 1d
i
��l I •- `o
134.51
- �4di
"sa.5
,��1�
•� �e 5l
i o
12 z
�� 35.1
113L 14
9
I
o ,)11
33.0
to
CD
O
J
W
X
b0
0
9
o' 9 ..: e
ti c9
L q4�
9
tT 4 Cie
54,7
;�p� 16
C 134.14
5 ti-al.
34 1.7\
l6 .
�l! f34.14 . "
'' s a�rl):
134.'
7 l2�,
134 6
�L1) 13
1341
8 IZ"
Im
&j1 12 _.
Oti)13 ;.;
134
..... 8�l
1
(�p1+ 12
.6
134.
lh� 1d
i
��l I •- `o
134.51
- �4di
"sa.5
2
Q
J°
Y
O
a
q _o _ 134. 1 •-
20 J 4. 5�$
1
134.94
N 134
is 3 1j1)
134.
tT 4 Cie
54,7
;�p� 16
C 134.14
5 ti-al.
k!
: fZA)15
134.1
J. 6 1tp�:
1
/114
-134.0
7 l2�,
134 6
�L1) 13
1341
8 IZ"
Im
&j1 12 _.
9 C'L3j
o (,q,5) 11 c
� I '
. d, 1ZQ
t34. 9
W
Y
O:
m`�
1�p G3 1,�
�t1�11
N 134
14Z .
;a 38(dr`-
` 1 707
� ;j;
r y1
} Ot
�}
K
oo((�� i 9
2,�1
3a t
. -�� ��µ`T
i,fj�i471. .
to
... 134.
lh� 1d
i
`
'�
� 6
,��1�
•� �e 5l
i o
• �- I
4.5,
.e
s 731 c. 5G
rI1K6 • E !B '�1 �S. ul�t ~ .2a..c2 a Ge - - `r� }9{413 34 "
S ` 4
RIA, , 834
i v , a,10 _
N
40
r_ 24-63
�h 3
1�p G3 1,�
�t1�11
N 134
14Z .
;a 38(dr`-
` 1 707
� ;j;
30
[Z4.5
;
4
. -�� ��µ`T
341.4
r34.T
... 134.
lh� 1d
i
� 6
,��1�
•� �e 5l
i o
• �- I
4.5,
.e
.134. v
s 731 c. 5G
rI1K6 • E !B '�1 �S. ul�t ~ .2a..c2 a Ge - - `r� }9{413 34 "
S ` 4
RIA, , 834
i v , a,10 _
N
40
r_ 24-63
�h 3
1�p G3 1,�
�t1�11
N 134
14Z .
;a 38(dr`-
` 1 707
� ;j;
30
[Z4.5
;
30 0
34.1 ^0
� O $
134 z
37r � ° 5o
14Z .
;a 38(dr`-
` 1 707
� ;j;
30
4
�: �
;
4
�
�
135 i6 Wioc
4
�
1 � %4�L1��
6.a i= (� • �at.ai�'s 6 t��o moo'•. KELLOGG PL c:. M o ]?Cie
qy
V '12, 1 .r to EI o a8 s,.5 r a� Q- q � j�%T 4 c nE?(51�
1f o L5 ;fiS p�Q 139.6 _ }
rt6. 12301 t3. 1 �s1.9 5 °�N ��>SL J%►� 31` /T��..b `,,,130 ,�o��
L ^ lt600 - 4� ? 1p (4/
�- 7t 164.
n 4 j• 12 �: 1 h1� S ��``� rs•��.
N mi. Z� �/ z�3� M v ° v 30`,� c 'r � ~�
a g� a•lb 3 b
CA G 30 �� a. e h 142 d
} 1.4E Q 'Pie h ` 25109 �g �t �� r1 20 �.� _ -•�. � �
js 65 Ql $ �y� 2 0 0) 7 ftr. i« pt ` O b i .e , �'` /3y�
1 61.30; r- nq • .n •' "I ` d 4S,3'1 rpml l ''�,G.e t `-
=0 ° -r�%� - ° ;d 39,� '� ✓ c+t8. 5 ti ^('J r�
,r7 �' ' 1d2.5 So ti <� R� q 0
G o^ d�'l`�°
Cr 3 v a\ „ o `� •, V �I T ` r o� v Z
l 23 d /V1 Ill�� ,►
c Q _ t1 iA 4
�S• I12 5 130 _ .... r 2 ,r 6 .r4' , � �5'�il rj
.n a 1co 1 ISO 50 '^ 140 '^ ��"`' - R/-� '?A at 1�
~ Q 4
Z � _ (S»� �� : •
S' ' !30 S` 1
j0 50
p c tt •
lI {. S coif• h rd0 �o,• v f
1 L '
C
n 4« _ J �i'W00�0 •�.$S' :�0/ 13 I �,jZ p�O �y 2O/�3�- c� C�� b� r' r.., 3�
-i r . _ ; s 'u .1 0 �. 3 I : �s �i M`a I ssji 61. f.
RT?.GnT.TTTTnN
WHEREAS, the City Council.of the City of Edina has received from the County
of Hennepin a list,of lands in said.municipality which became the property
of the State of Minnesota for non- payment,of property taxes, which said list
is dated October 9, 1985, Report No. P1421101; and
WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been
classified by the Board.of County Commissioners.of Hennepin County, Minnesota
as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been-authorized
by said Board.of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting.pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board.of County
Commissioners of each.parcel of land described in said list as non- conser-
vation land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale,of each
such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City,of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes.of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of December, 1985.
City Clerk
JUT "A
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO
PROVIDE THAT ANNUAL ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
SHALL EXPIRE ON THE 1ST DAY OF JULY FOLLOWING THE
DATE OF ISSUANCE THEREOF
Section 1. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 902 is amended by adding the following
thereto:
"Every license issued under this Sec. 9 shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on
the July 1 following its date of issuance. Licenses which have been duly
issued pursuant to this Sec. 9 and which are scheduled to terminate on
April 1, 1986, may be extended by the City Council so as to have a termination
date of 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1986, provided that a request for extension
shall be accompanied by all application data, fees, bonds, and certificates
of insurance required by this ordinance for the issuance of a license.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
v
'
198'5 L
OF EDINA
CHECK ;TER
12 - 02 -8; GE 1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENJOt
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
0 P.O. M MESSAGE
_
z
v ('
332780
11/26/85
19540.00
DAVE DLIIV -R
SERVICES
10 -4200- 353 -30
11,540.00 r
L
*f **f*
* ** -CKS
336004
11/22/85
17.25
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY.
10 -4262- 628 -62
ti I
17.25 •
=
ffrff *
* ** -CKS
33rs00B
11/25/85
34.97
KAMAN- BEAtING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -1540- 560 -56
34.97 •
r*rf rr
*** —CKS
I.
335012
11/25/85
24.95
AJTDNOBILr- SERVICE C
CONT.REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
24.95
! I
335013
11/25/85
40.26
ALTERNATO2.RE3UILO
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
335013
11/25/85
61.42
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REP.AIR.PARTS
40 -4540- 811 -80
101.68 •
,.
rr�f *•
fa* -CK$
335026
11/26/85
4,911.6D
BADGER AET:R INC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00
_
336026
11/26/85
19196.50,
BADGE2 METER INC
WATER METERS
40 -1220- 000 -00
335026
11/26/85
689.49
BADGER METER INC
R =PAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 807 -80
336026
11/25/85
102.02
BAOGER.METER INC
REPAIR PARTAS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
L
-,
69899.61
*f* -CKS
335033
11/25/85
110.50
BERG' F G OID TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82
bj
336033
11/25/85
256.00
BERGORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -84
336033
11/25/85
20300
BERGFORO TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 862 -86
569.50 •
_
E.,
f *ffff
* *• -CKS
335047
11/25185
9.84
BROWN 'HOTO
PHOTO SPLY
10- 4508 - 422 -42
.
9.84
4y
ff*fff
fff- CKS
336049
11/26/85
36.70
BURES4 °- R33ERT
MEETINGS
10 -4206- 440 -44
v
"I
36.70 •
.•
- -- -- -- - --
CKS
335054
11/25/85
35.33
BATTERY WOREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
�'"
336054
11/25/85
87.14
BATTERr.W4REHOUSE
REPAIR PARTAS
10 -4540- 560 -56
V'
-•
331054
11125/85
85.80-
BATT= Rr.W44EHOUSE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
�r
�►
�R
ffrfff
• ** -CKS
a:l
•
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
10 -4620- 560 -56
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
336060
11/26/85
•
-, �Ri
t!lfff
9 P.O. N MESSAGE
91.54
336074
11/25/85
'.
336074
11/25/85
91.54 *
335082
11/25/85
'I
#lif if
33SO90
11/25185
„l
336090
11/25185
KENNEL SERV
335090
11/25/85
0
335091
11/25185
KENNEL SERV
336091
11/25/85
497.00 *
336091
11/25/85
336091
11/25/85
335091
11/25/85
336091
11/25/85
10.25
336091
11/25/85
EQUIP MAINT
336091
11/25/85
10.25
335091
11/25/85
336091
11/25/85
33SO91
11/25/85
r
336091
11/25/85
19514.14
335091
11/25/85
CONT REPAIRS
336091
11/25/85
�I.
CERT
POWEI TRAIN:
�
• .j
fifff#
336108
11/25185
`�;
ifff if
POWE2.TRAIN
REPAIR PARTAS
33S114
11/25/85
29008.06
336114
11/25/85
4b
`��,
9911x•
379367.43
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
335125
11/25/85
2699852.15
335125
11/25/85
INTERFUND DIS
335125
11/26/85
109.74
336125
11/26/85
WATER
10 -4258- 446 -44
65.40
CITY
OF EDINA
36.00 DALE GA EEI COMPANY
36.00 • -
237.50 DELE ;ARD FOOL- CO
79.35 _ OELESAR3 ;T00L CO
316.85 •
620.00 MERIT - SUPPLY
437.25 MERIT SUPPLY
26.40. MERIT SUPPLY
309.78 MERIT SUPPLY
GEN- SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803-80
PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56
PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
10- 4520- 318 -30
CHECK REGISTER
10 -4620- 560 -56
CLEANING SUPPLIES
11 -26 -85 PAGE 2
AMOUNT
WEN301
ITEM DESCRIPTION. ___.___-
ACCOUNT. NO.-.INV.
9 P.O. N MESSAGE
91.54
AMBASS4381
SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 104 -70
91.54 *
* ** -CKS
190.00
CITY
O 8 0DMIIGTON
KENNEL SERV
10- 4278 - 470 -47
307.00
CITY,O°
SLOOMI46TON.
KENNEL SERV
10- 4278 - 470x47
497.00 *
-
*** -CKS
10.25
CDNWAY.FItE
6 SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 420 -42
10.25
** *-CKS
19514.14
CERT
POWEt- TRAIN
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
464.19
CERT
POWEI TRAIN:
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
29.73
CERT
POWE2.TRAIN
REPAIR PARTAS
10 -4540- 560 -56
29008.06
379367.43
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
10- 2050- 000 -00
2699852.15
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
10- 2050- 000 -00
109.74
CITY
OF E31NA
WATER
10 -4258- 446 -44
65.40
CITY
OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258-646 -64
29400.00
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
10- 4283- 420 -42
59000.00
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
10- 4284 - 625 -62
409761.15
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
15- 2050 - 000 -00
999202.30,
CITY
OF EDINA
INTERFUND DIS
27 -2050- 000 -00
119559.D7
CITY
OF,E)INA
INTERFUND DIS
28- 2050 - 000 -00
69175.92
CITY
OF.E)INA
INTERFUND DIS
40- 2050 - 000 -00
291169500.20
CITY
OF.E)INA
INTERFUND DIS
40- 2050 - 000 -00
468.00
CITY
OF E31NA
INTERFUND DIS
50- 2650- 000 -00
1189039.29
CITY
OF.E)INA
INTERFUND DIS
60- 2050 - 000 -00
989986.17
CITY
OF EIINA
INTERFUND DIS
66- 2050- 000 -00
298061486.82 •
.. ...
36.00 DALE GA EEI COMPANY
36.00 • -
237.50 DELE ;ARD FOOL- CO
79.35 _ OELESAR3 ;T00L CO
316.85 •
620.00 MERIT - SUPPLY
437.25 MERIT SUPPLY
26.40. MERIT SUPPLY
309.78 MERIT SUPPLY
GEN- SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803-80
PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56
PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56
CALCIUM CHLORIDE
10- 4520- 318 -30
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4512 - 708 -70
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28 =4512- 708 -70
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1985 t
OF EDINA
CHECK STER
11 -26 -8; GE 3
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
V_ND0.2
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
k P.O. p MESSAGE
336125
11/25185
498.00
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 811 -80.
336125
11/25/85
498.00
MERIT SOPDLY
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 811 -80
29389.43
•
r *rrr*
* *r -CKS
336131
11/22185
68000
ASPLUND COFFEE
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 704 -70
'!
68.00
* ** -CKS
336136
11/25/85
594 -96-
EARL F 4N3ERSEN
SIGNS POSTS
10 -4542- 325 -30
~I'
336136
11/25/85
173.10
EARL F.ANIERSEN
SIGNS POSTS.
10 -4542- 328 -30
336136
11/25/85
201.60
EARL F ANIERSEN:
SIGNS,POSTS
10 -4542- 328 -30
969.66
r
.r ,'I
rrrrrr
r *r -CKS
336146
11/25/85
445.20,
GREEN ACRES SPKL
CONT.SERV
10- 4200 - 646 -64
;:.
445.20
rrr -I
rr *rrr
* ** -CKS
335148
11/25/85
43080
ELVIN SAF_TY SUPPLY
GEN, SUPPLIES-
10 -4504- 301 -30
-w �,.:
43.80
* .
Er*
h,
*rrr
*r* -CKS
`�'_
"'i
335150
11/25/85
55.75
ELECTlN: CENTER
GEN:SUPPLIES
40- 504 - 804 -80
�,�'
55.75
r-
- - -- -
K'
r *errr
* ** -CKS
335156
11/25/85
118.99
FAIRVIEW 40SPIFAL
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44
G.I336156
11/25/85
299.32
FAIRVIEW iOSPITAL.
IST.AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440.44
336156
11/25/85
254.25
FAIRVIEiw.lOSPIT AL,
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44
672.56
11/22/85
20.DO
50TH FRAN:E BUS ASSN.
MEETING.EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 820 -82
J`I336157
20.00
•
***r**
--
- -- - ----
* ** -CKS
335167
11/25185
20.00
FIRST NATIONAL BANK:
CONT SERV.
10 -4200- 500 -50
;i
20.00
r
-
,n�d
r ** -CKS
336183
11/25/85
4.73
GIVENS IN_i
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 646 -64
336183
11/25/85
483.95
GIVENS IN:
REPAIR,.PARTAS
40 -4540- 802 -80
488.68
•
_ -.. _._
_._ . _.._ .. _.. _. _
s•
r ** *►*
* * * -CK
336188'.
11/25/85
47.77
GRAT,341t ELECTRIC CO'
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-322-30
I
800.39
CHECK REGISTER.
11 -26 -85 PAGE 4
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
ITEM DESCRIPTION
-------ACCOUNT NO..-INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE
47.77 •
789.68
CHECK NO.
DATE
I.
G B K SERVICES
* ** -CKS
!f•kff
GENERAL C)4MUNICATNS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4540- 560 -56
665.00
GENERAL'C3AMUNICATNS
335194
11/25/85
113.39
336194
11/25/85
40 -4504- 801 -80
336194
11/25/85
Vr�
•fff•!
LEROY 41LIBBY
4II
335199
11/25/85
390.50
HALL44M
390.50
*
9.23
336206
11/25/85
* --
-
335206
11/25/85
f.`
63.00
335206
11/25/85
606.33
336206
11/25/85
606.33
*.
713.02•
•!ff •f
INTERSTATE
�► I
335209
11/25/85
is
I'
`I
�1
335213
11/26/85
fff lf•
335218
11/25/85
�+
33523.0
11/25/85
331256
11/25185
�I,
I
336267
11/25185
v '
335275
11/25/85
800.39
CHECK REGISTER.
11 -26 -85 PAGE 4
AMOUNT
VEN001
ITEM DESCRIPTION
-------ACCOUNT NO..-INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE
47.77 •
789.68
6 8 K SERVICES
318.94
G B K SERVICES
* ** -CKS
22.00
GENERAL C)4MUNICATNS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4540- 560 -56
665.00
GENERAL'C3AMUNICATNS
AUTOMOBILES
10 -4908- 502 -50
113.39
GENERAL C)MMUNICATNS
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80
800.39
*
19.94
6 T PARTS
19.94
*
789.68
6 8 K SERVICES
318.94
G B K SERVICES
256.60
G B K SERVICES
293.53
6 8 K SERVICES
19658.75
•
35.83
GENUIIIE PARTS.
35.83
*
720.00
LEROY 41LIBBY
720.00
*
390.50
HALL44M
390.50
*
9.23
HOFF 'IILLIAMSON
9.23
* --
-
63.00
ICSI
63.00
*
606.33
IBM CO:R!OiATION
606.33
*.
713.02•
INTERSTATE
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56
LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30
LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56
LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64
LAUNDRY 40- 4262 - 801 -80
GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56
SERVICES 40 -4200- 800 -80
LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56
GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 120 -12
CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 420 -42
EOUIPiRENTAL 10- 4226- 510 -51
REPAIR -PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
** *-CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* **-CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1935 '1 OF EDINA
v
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
336275 11/25/85 50.94
335275 11/25/85 33.43
797.39 •
CHECK STER 11 -26 -8. GE 5
VENOOI� ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE
INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
INTERSTATE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
•
* ** -CKS `
t
* ** -CKS `
** *-CKS
4
4
ff!!f•
I
„
336278
11/25/85
21.00
JERRYS FOODS
MEETING EXPENSE
10- 4206 - 440 -44
21.00 •
335279
11/25/85
76.57
JERRYS OUt,OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
336279
11/25/85
164.91
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
336279
11/25/85
35.02
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 328 -30.
•vi'
336279
11/25/85
37.29
JERRYS QUA
OWN
.HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
- 10- 4504- 340 -30
336279
11/25/85
6.90
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 390 -30
336279
11/25185
48.05
JERRYS DUI
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
336279
11/25/85
5.64
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
336279
11/25185
14.75
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
336279
11/25/85
19.30
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47
M,
336279
11/25/85
25.27
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
336279
11/25/85
15.22
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
335279
11/25/85
34.07
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 600 -60
336279
11/25/85
6.94
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
;'.
336279
11/25/85
19.87
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 440 -44
336279
11/25/85
9.89
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646-64
.,
336279
11/25/85
42.17
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
336279
11/25/85
824.25
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
CAPITAL OUTLAY
10- 4900 - 390 -30
336279
11/25/85
38.59
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
ow
336279
11/25/85
20.56
JERRYS OUt,
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 660 -66
336279
11/25/85
32.30
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 662 -66
336279
11/25/85
28.16
JERRYS OUA.
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4620- 662-66
�.
336279
11/25/85
10.58
JERRYS OUt
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
336279
11/25/85
62.09
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80
336279
11/25185
2.99
JERRYS OUR
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 803 -80
336279
11/25/85
14.54
JERRYS OUA
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 803 -80
336279
11/25/85
4.09
JERRYS.OU.A•OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80
I
19600.01 •
M '
!fflf!
336301
11/25/85
40.00
KREMER SPAS.
B
ALIGN-
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
«
flit if
336304
11/25/85
18.75
KNOX LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
q,; j
335304
11/25/85
54.43
KNOX LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 340 -30
:•.
336304
11/25/85
28.15
KNOX LUMBER
CO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 646 -64
�.�
336304
11/25/85
12.50
KNOX.LUMBER
CO
_ _
REPAIR PARATS _
10- 4540- 646 -64
vl
336304
11/25/85
11.25 -,
KNOX LUMBER
CO
CREDIT
10- 4540- 646 -64
I°
335304
11/25/85
214.79
KNOX LUMBER
CO
GUARD RAIL
10- 4546 - 340 -30
336304
11/22/85
41.78
KNOX LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646 -64
336304
11/22185
263.97
KNOX LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
336304
11/25/85
26.83
KNOX LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
4604- 646 -64
336304
11/25/85
11.22
KNOX LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
_,10-
10 -4604- 646 -64
336304
11/22/85
29.10
KNOX LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
•
* ** -CKS `
t
* ** -CKS `
** *-CKS
4
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
DATE
I,
�- 336304
11/26/85
V ffff ►f
# P.O. 0 MESSAGE
336317
11/25/85
335317
11/25/85
335317
11/25/85
336317
11/25185
�- 336317
11/25/85
336317
11/22/85
' ffffff
GEN SUPPLY
336323
11/25/85
336323
11/25185
335324
11/22/85
336324
11/22/85
'- 335324
'I
11/22/85
336324
11/22/85
335324
11122185
336324
11/22/85
336324
11/22/85
336324
11/22/85
!! 336324
11/22/85
336324
11/22185
335324
11/22/85
336324
l
11/22/85
�' f!lfff
335343
11/25/85
10- 4228-160 -16
335344
33634.4
"�.._ 336344
336344
"I. 336359
336359
336359
i,
336360
336360
" 336360.
336360
11/25/85
11/25/85
11/25/85
11/25/85
AMOUNT
36.07
732.34 f
64.99
101.04
338.67
247.98
389.42
5.45
19147.45
10.00
5.00-
15.00
781.62 -
19005.51
781.62
19455.43
29020.10
19520.02
749.69
29255.00
19350.79
234.19
234.20
234.19
119059.72
80.64
80.64 •
84.00
8.00-
13.00- .
240.16
303.16 •
CHECK
REGISTER
_ MINN TORO
11 -26 -85 PAGE 6
fENDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. 0 MESSAGE
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
INC
19476.02
* ** -CKS
LAWSON PR))UCTS
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 322 -30
WANNER
LAWSON PR))UCTS
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 325 -30
WANNER
LAWSON PR)DUCTS
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 646-64
WANNER
LAWSON PR30UCTS
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
WANNER
LAWSON PR)DUCTS
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
LAWSON.PRDDUCTS
FREIGHT
27- 4292 - 662 -66
* **-CKS
LINH3F =l.
PHOTO SUPPLY
10- 4508 - 440 -44
LINHOFFI
PHOTO SUPPLY
10 -4508- 440 -44
LOGIS
CORRECTION
10- 4228-160 -16
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4228 - 160 -16
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4228- 160 -16
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10 -4230- 160 -16
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4233 - 200 -20
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4233 - 420 -42
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4233 - 560 -56
LOGI3
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4906 - 420 -42
LOGI3
COMPUTER BILLING
40- 4232 - 800 -80
LOGI3
COMPUTER BILLING
50- 4233 - 820 -82
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
50 -4233- 840 -84
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
50- 4233 - 860 -86
* ** -CKS
MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56
NED OXTGEI & EQUIP
NED OXISEII & EQUIP
_.
NED OXYGEI.& EQUIP
RED DXYGE.l & EQUIP
11/26/85
19400.00
_ MINN TORO
INC
11/26/85
11.52-
MINN TORO
INC
11/26/85
87.54
MINN,TORO
INC
19476.02
11/25/85
35.00
MINNESOTA
WANNER
11/25/85
64.00
MINNESOTA
WANNER
11/25/85
31.00
MINNESOTA
WANNER
11/25/85
54.00
MINNESOTA,
WANNER
CREDIT
CREDIT
CREDIT
EQUIP MAINT
EQUIP MAINT
CREDIT.
REPAIR.PARTS
10- 4274 - 449 -44
10-4274-449-44
10- 4274 - 449 -44
10- 4274 - 449-44
27 -4274- 670 -66
27 -4540- 670 -66
27- 4540- 670 -66
CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 322 -30
CONT REPAIRS. 10- 4248- 560 -56
CONT REPAIRS �10- 4248-560 -56
PARTS. . 10 -4620- 560 -56
* **-CKS
V
•
1905 �(
OF EDINA
CHECK
STER
11-26 -8'. 4GE 7
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
YEVDO2
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
i
184.00
•
•
rrrara
a►a -CKS
~I
336370
11/26/85
586.06
MIDLAND P.ADDUCTS CO
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 704 -70
586.06
IS,
rffltf
• *• —CKS
�.
33S374
11/25/85
220.00
MN PACK & REC ASSN
CONFERENCE
10- 4202 - 600 -60
220.00
•
r
arrrrr
rra —CKS
336381
11/22/85
57.00
STAR'S TRI3UNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 160 -16
57.00
'•i
arrltr
• *+ —CKS
1w
336385
11/26/85
240.00
MCGUIREt 10BERT
TREE INSPECTION
10 -4242- 353 -30
336385
11/26/85
480.00
MCGUIREi 40SERT
TREE INSPECTION
60- 1300 - 012 -18
720.00
arf•!r
rrr —CKS
v
1.
336412
11/25/85
50.88
NY GRAPHI ". SUPPLY
INV.SPLY
.23- 1209 - 000 -00
336412
11/25/85
32.40
NY GRAPHI= 'SUPPLY
INVENTORY.SPLJY
23 -1209- 000 -00
'
83.28
•
4
-'
frfrlr
raa —CKS
wl
F.
336421
11/25/85
102.29
OLSON CHAIN '& CABLE
GUARD RAIL _
10- 4546 - 340 -30
102.29
•
- `
rffrir
• +; —CKS
`I
336441
11/22/85
229.40
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING.
10 -4600- 628 -62
229.40
•
a.....
aar —CKS
336443
11/22/85
10.65
PDMMER•MFs!'CO
GEN SUPP'
" - -10- 4504 - 624 -62
10.65*
`
" r
rfffff
aar —CKS
Il_
336449
11/25/85
230.01
P F C EQUIP
REPAIR PARATS
40 -4540- 805 -80
230.01
• "
vl'
^i
�
arfr!!
rra —CKS
336452
11/25/85
45.00,
QUICK SERY'BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
4
1
336452
11/25/85
63.48
'OUICK;.SERY•BATTERY'.
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
`
336452
11/25/85
97.50
_
- 'QUICK;SERY- BATTERY
_
REPAIR PARTS
_
- 10 -4540- 560 -56
' "�
336452.
11/25/85-
15.00:
OUICK,SERY;BATTERY
REPAI.R.PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
1
AMOUNT
220.98 *
28.80
28.80 *
8.15
8.15 *
CHECK REGISTER 11 -26 -85 PAGE 8
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION___ _ACCOUNT-NO..INV- A P.O. # MESSAGE
RITEW4F
REPAIR PARTS
RICHFIELD 3LUHB & CO CONT REPAIRS
10 -4540- 560 -56
28 -4248- 707 -70
63.83 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30
63.83 *
69690000,
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
10- 3095- 000 -00
CHECK N0.
DATE
SUR TAX.
ffffff
336455
11/25/85
f.•f *•
336465
11/26/85
�-
ff *ff•
GEN "SUPPLY.
10 -4594- 460 -46
336475
11/25/85
I�•I
:••.ff
34.78
SOUTHDALE FORD
336485
11/25185
34.78 •
336485
11/25/85
i
336486
11/25/85
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 330 -30
36.68
ff•f **
28.73
336492
11/25/85
h-
51.02
SUBUR3AM_:HEVROLET,
�-
335498
11/25/85
-
- - --
•.' i
ffffff
CONT.REPAIRS
28 -4248- 708 -70
336502
11/25/85
REPAIR PARTS
336502
11/25/85
•'I,
335503
11/22185
j_,
336503
11/25/85
10- 2149- 000 -00
11.75
ST PAUU BOOK.
` "I
fffftf
27.97 *
MINNESOTA, SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
336508
11/25/85
66.38
ST P4UU BIOK
336508
11/25/85
336505
11/25/85
w
'1
336508
11/22/85
1 i`!:8'1- •
. 151.92 *
336508
11/25/85
336508
11/25/85
'
- u
AMOUNT
220.98 *
28.80
28.80 *
8.15
8.15 *
CHECK REGISTER 11 -26 -85 PAGE 8
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION___ _ACCOUNT-NO..INV- A P.O. # MESSAGE
RITEW4F
REPAIR PARTS
RICHFIELD 3LUHB & CO CONT REPAIRS
10 -4540- 560 -56
28 -4248- 707 -70
63.83 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30
63.83 *
69690000,
STATE BLD3 INSP
BLDG. PERMITS
10- 3095- 000 -00
109.00
STATE BLDI INSP
SUR TAX.
10- 3113 - 000 -00
69799.00 *
23.00
DON STR- cI:HER GUNS
GEN "SUPPLY.
10 -4594- 460 -46
23.00 *
34.78
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
LO -4540- 560 -56
34.78 •
36.68
STAR.t- ELE .-TTRONICS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 330 -30
36.68
28.73
SUBURBAN :HEVRDLET
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
51.02
SUBUR3AM_:HEVROLET,
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
79.75*
-
- - --
21.55
SUBURBAN:NLUMS SUP
CONT.REPAIRS
28 -4248- 708 -70
72 -14
SUBURBAN 2LUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 807 -80
93.69 *
30.91
ST PAUL'B30K
CABLE TV
10- 2149- 000 -00
11.75
ST PAUU BOOK.
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
27.97 *
MINNESOTA, SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
66.38
ST P4UU BIOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
10 -4504- 510 -51
27.66
ST PAULt.,BJOK>
GEN,SUPPLIES
UP.PLY;,
__ -23 -4504- 611 -61'.- - -
1 i`!:8'1- •
. 151.92 *
* ** -CKS
* *• -CKS
* ** -CKS
** *-CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
*** -CKS
* ** -CKS
19256.94
CHECK
STER
`
1955 ^I
OF EDINA
AMOUNT
VEN)Ot
40- 4540 - 803 -8D
v!
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
1j822.34, *`
CHECK
NO. DATE
REPAIR
_ _
PARTS
* ** -CKS
I�
SEARS.RDE33CK
GEN SUPPLIES
335516
11/25/85
194.56
336516
11/22/85
CONT.REPAIRS.
336545
11/25/85
r i �
tetr*•
335553
11/25/85
336553
11/25/85
335553
11/25/85
TWIN Crr 34RAGE
336553
11/25/85
�i
335553
11/25/85
1wi i
r *r :rr
336572
11/25/85
336573
11/25/85
,,;
j:
336573
11/25/85
y �
rrrrrr
31.94
='r
335575
11/25/85
„!
336575
11/25/85
"I
336575
11/25/85
10 -4540- 520 -52
336575
11/25/85
r
REPAIR PARTS,
r�.
110.12
UNITED ELECTRIC.CORP.
REPAIR PARTS
"I,_
335586
11/2S/85
vl_
336586.
11/25/85
*rt *r*
of .
336594
11/25/85
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER.SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
254.00
��
rrrrrr
107.23
VOSS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 647 -64
22.32
336703
11/22/85
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 661 -66
336704
11/22/85
•
19256.94
CHECK
STER
377.70,
WATER.PRO)UCTS
11 -26 -8: GE 9
AMOUNT
VEN)Ot
40- 4540 - 803 -8D
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
1j822.34, *`
.PARTS
10- 4540 - 647 -64
REPAIR
_ _
PARTS
* ** -CKS
199.98
SEARS.RDE33CK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 500 -50
194.56
SEARS,ROE3UCK,
CONT.REPAIRS.
28 -4248r 708 -70
394.54
*** —CKS
766.78
TWIN Crr 34RAGE
DODR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
766.78 *
*** —CKS
21.36
UNIT =D EL =CTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 322 -30
31.94
UNITED EL =CTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 322 -30
17.35
UNITED EL:CTRIC
CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
25.23
UNITED EL?CTRIC'CORP,
REPAIR PARTS,
10 -4540- 646 -64
110.12
UNITED ELECTRIC.CORP.
REPAIR PARTS
23 -4540- 611 -61
206.00 +
* ** —CKS
254.00
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER.SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
254.00
107.23
VOSS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 647 -64
22.32
VOSS
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 661 -66
129.55
* ** —CKS
19256.94
WATER
PR03UCTS
377.70,
WATER.PRO)UCTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
87.70
WATER.PR03UCTS
40- 4540 - 803 -8D
100.00.
WATER,'PRO)UCTS
40 -4540- 803 -80
1j822.34, *`
.PARTS
10- 4540 - 647 -64
:133.17 W W 6RAIN;ER
138.46 W W GRAINER
271.63 +
39604.16 STORE -FRONT
39404.16
425.00. EDINA 3LD; DEPT.
425.00 +.
29.95 RD,jGER.: LA),tENCE PD
CONST
27 -1300- 000 -00
REPAIR.P'ARTS.
40- 4540 - 803 -80
PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -8D
-REPAIR
REPAIR
PARATS
40 -4540- 803 -80
REPAIR
.PARTS
10- 4540 - 647 -64
REPAIR
_ _
PARTS
__
40- 4540 - 802 -80
SERVICES_ 10 -4224- 504 -50
SAC FEE 60- 1300 - 010 -29
REPAIR PARTS. 10- 4294- 440 -44
** *—CKS
** *—CKS
* ** —CKS
ti
1985 CITY OF EDINA
HECK N0. DATE
336705
336706
335707
335708
V
336109
336710
M
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
336711
j
336712
AMOUNT
VE4001
�I
336713
v)
336714
f'
336715
v
10 -4204- 440 -44
30.00
336716
336717
9.00
C F ANDERSON COMP
1ST AID SUPP
336718
, �T
336718
55.00
336719
f.
336719
owl
I
*
336721
-_
I A F C
MEMBERSHIP
336722
60.00
*
4
e
O
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
11/22/85
12.00 MLN DEPT 3F PUBLIC
12.00.! - -
19408.50 FISCO
BUYER CARD 50- 4310 - 840 -84
CLOTHING REPLACEMENT' 10- 4574- 440 -44
CHECK REGISTER
11-26 -85 PAGE 10
AMOUNT
VE4001
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. I P.O. 0 MESSAGE
29.95
*
30.00
CITIZAV L -AGUE
MEMBERSHIP
10 -4204- 440 -44
30.00
*
9.00
C F ANDERSON COMP
1ST AID SUPP
1D- 4510 - 440 -44
9.00
.
55.00
OATREK'MAIKETING
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 440 -44
55.00
*
60.00
I A F C
MEMBERSHIP
10 -4204- 440 -44
60.00
*
148.78
YM B FECK
LODGING
10 -4202- 440 -44
148.78
*
189.80
XEROX CDR31-
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 510 -51
189.80
105.00
NAT1344L _EAGUE OF
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 160 -16
105.00
*
500.00.
JOE GREUPNER
SERVICES
27 -4100- 675 -66
500.00
*
680.55
ALP�A VIDEO 8 AUDIO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
680.55
*
50.00
MOREAU J SANKEY
REGISTRATION
10 -4202- 200 -20
50.00
*
155.53
SUSAN 4002=
MEETINGS
10 -2149- 000 -00
155.53
*
19722.60
DEAN CDNSTANTINE
DANCE INSTRUCTION
10 -2240- 000 -00
19722.60
787.50
MARK HUID
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 500 -50
787.50
*
738.00
E H %ENNEI & SONS
CONT- REPAIRS
10-4248-646-64
1.530.00
E H 1EINE1 B SONS
CONT. REPAIRS,
10 -4248- 646 -64
29268.00
*
2.50
R C IDENTIFICATIONS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 440 -44
2.50_
R C„ IDENTIEICAT.IONS
GEN SUPPLIES.
10- 4504_490 -.49
5.00
*
** CKS
12.00 MLN DEPT 3F PUBLIC
12.00.! - -
19408.50 FISCO
BUYER CARD 50- 4310 - 840 -84
CLOTHING REPLACEMENT' 10- 4574- 440 -44
19it5`I OF EDINA CHECK STER 11726 -8 GE it
r
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT YENDOI, ITEM DESCRIPTION. ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE
•
CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -4900- 300 -30
OFFICE SUPPLY _ .. 10 -4516- 200 -20
INST.FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61
CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00
GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30
GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTAS, 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54
REPAIR.PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
REPAIR�PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR -PARTS
EQUIP, RENAL
REPAIR PARTS
CONT.REPAIRS,
TELEPHONE T
POWER
;REIMBURSENENTS
40 -4540- 813 -80
10- 4226 - 301 -30
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4248 - 440 -44
10 -4 256- 510 -51
10- 4252 - 345 -30
10- 4202 - 420 -42
19408.50 •
336123
11/22/85
429164.00.
LAKELAVD TRUCK CTR
j
429164.00 +
1
336724
11/25/85
40.00
AMERICAN:.DUNCIL OF
..
40.00 •
336725
11/25/85
171.84
ROSE EDIN
171.84 •
336726
11/25/85
303.68
SAFWAT STEEL PROD
i
303.68 •
336727
11/25/85
127.65
BRODIEAD 'sARRETT CD.
�.`
127.65 •.
336728
11/25/85
72.85
WEST WELD
„i
72.85 •.
336729
11/25185
62.37
CONVEYORS!
+,
62.37 • .
�?
336730
11/25/85
73.20
MECO
y.4
73.20.+
1-
33ST31
11/25/85
282.72
ZAHL EOJIxMENT CD
282.72
336732
11/25/85
2.47
FLEET.MAIVTENANCE
j
2.47 +
I.I
")
333133
11/25/85
109.72
ROAD RESCJE INC
109.72 *
1_.
;I
336734
11125/85
367.00,
ESS BROTH =RS & SONS
��
367.00:•
336735
11/25/85
280.00
JOHN.TRACY
4i.
280.00 •
i
336736:
11/25/85
65.20
^ELECTRIC ROTOR
°t
65.20.•
336737
11/25/85
85.00
CUSTOM CAIERA
,� II'
i
85.0 0 •
- --
^S'r
336738
11/25/85
95.02
A T.6 F
95.02•:
j
336739
11/25/85
134.46
CITY OF. RICHFIELD
g<
134.46 •
336740.'
11/25/85
131.73
NANCY. .KARKHOFF
�'6
131.73.:• ,
_.
•
CAPITAL OUTLAY 10 -4900- 300 -30
OFFICE SUPPLY _ .. 10 -4516- 200 -20
INST.FEE 23 -4100- 614 -61
CONST 27- 1300 - 000 -00
GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30
GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTAS, 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54
REPAIR.PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
REPAIR�PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
REPAIR -PARTS
EQUIP, RENAL
REPAIR PARTS
CONT.REPAIRS,
TELEPHONE T
POWER
;REIMBURSENENTS
40 -4540- 813 -80
10- 4226 - 301 -30
10- 4540 - 540 -54
10- 4248 - 440 -44
10 -4 256- 510 -51
10- 4252 - 345 -30
10- 4202 - 420 -42
T-
s
86.40 *
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
M
MINVALCD INC
92.54
MINVALCD INC
CHECK NO.
DATE
41.97
JOAN'W4TEASTREET
41.97 *
336741
11/25/85
419.51 *
3429575.00
FIRST TRUST ST PAUL
336742
11/25/85
3749324.99 *
336742
11/25/85
TYPCO INC.
336742
11/25/85
49667.50
336743
11/25/85
+� !'
336744
11/25/85
20.15
336745
11/25/85
I I
336745
11/25/85
.•
336746
11/25/85
+t
339.96
HILLS
.j
336747
11/25/85
LOU 43RAH44'
336748
11/25/85
i�
_ MORTON THIOKOL INC
19100.48 *
336749
11/25/85
I,
610.00
POLICE
336750
11/25/85
35.00
BONNIE BRAXTON.
35.00
336751
11/25/85
ts,..
53.24
ALEXANDER MFG
336752
11/25/85
.336753
11/25/85
u
336754
11/25185
335755
11/25/85
335756
11/25/85
I'
_336757
_ ._ -_
11/25/85
I.
336758
11/25/85
SL
e
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOt ITEM DESCRIPTION
86.40.
E A SWEEN CO
86.40 *
498.80.
MINVALCD INC
36.04
MINVALCD INC
92.54
MINVALCD INC
627.38 *
41.97
JOAN'W4TEASTREET
41.97 *
419.51
EDWARD KRAEMER
419.51 *
3429575.00
FIRST TRUST ST PAUL
319749.99
FIRST TRUST ST PAUL
3749324.99 *
10.00
TYPCO INC.
10.00 •
49667.50
DE OE HENIEL
49667.50 •
20.15
WET N DRY BASEMENT
20.15
600.00
N CRAIG J34NSON
600.00 •
140.00
ASHTDY TAPE
140.00 *
339.96
HILLS
339.96 *
38.24
LOU 43RAH44'
38.24 *
19100.48 _
_ MORTON THIOKOL INC
19100.48 *
39008.46
FEED RITE CONTROLS
30008.46 *
610.00
POLICE
610.00
35.00
BONNIE BRAXTON.
35.00
638.40
_- HOLIDAY
638.40 _
53.24
ALEXANDER MFG
CONCESSIONS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REIMBURSEMENT
GEN SUPPLIES
DUE HRA
INTEREST BONDS
RUBBISH ".REMOVAL
PRO SERV
REFUND
WOODHAVEN.APPRAISAL
SOFTWARE
INV SPJL7
MILEAGE
SALT
WATER SUPPLYU
CAR WASHING
REIMBURSEMENT
AMMUNITION _
RADIO SERV'
11 -26 -85 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P -O. 0 MESSAGE
28- 4624- 704 -70
10- 4540 - 540 -54
40 -4540- 802 -80
40 -4540- 802 -80
10- 4202 - 420 -42
40- 4504 - 803 -80
10 -1145- 000 -00
_27 -4300- 660 -66
10 -4250- 353 -30
10- 2235 - 000 -00
10- 3095 - 000 -00
10- 2143 - 000 -00
10-4906-500-50
23- 1209 - 000 -00
40- 4208 - 806 -80
10- 4538- 318 -30
40- 4622 - 805 -80
10- 4296 - 560 -56
10- 4200 - 421 -42
29-4592-720-72
10- 4294 - 440 -44
i
•
•
a
a
a
1965 `(
OF EDINA
11 -26 -8, GE 13
AMOUNT
VEN301'.
ITER DESCRIPTION
CHECK
NO. DATE
336759
11/25/85
b
33S760.
11/25/85
40 -4540- 802 -80
336761
11/25/85
335762
11/25/85
A PLUS PR =SORT
336763
11/25/85
'
336764
11/25/85
�j
335764
11/25/85
DUES
336764
11/25/85
I
s i I
40.00
336765
11/25/85
23- 3500 - 000 -00
.40.00 •
336766
11/25/85
I
CLERICAL FEE
23- 3500 - 000 -00
36.00
*** ***
i
`I
336769
11/26/85
CLERICAL FEE
23- 3500 - 000 -00
4.00-
LOIS BECH
336770
11/26/85
i
LOIS 3ECH
CLASS REFUND
23- 3800 - 000 -00
336771
11/26/85
C_
336172
11/26/85
OERN31 Coy•
DUE HRA
10- 1145 - 000 -00
i
1,
336773
11126185
336774
11/26/85
ROOM B 80ARO
33S775-
11/26/85
.'�
336775
11/26185
I -.
_
-- -
-- * * * -CKS
336776
11/26/85
REFUND
336777
11/26/85
•
•
•
a
a
a
CHECK
;TER
11 -26 -8, GE 13
AMOUNT
VEN301'.
ITER DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INY. N P.O. I MESSAGE
53.24 -•
38.00
ACE M41UF4CTURING
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 802 -80
38.00
92.12
A PLUS PR =SORT
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 510 -51
92.12 •
55.00
AM SOCIET /.OF
DUES
10 -4204- 420 -42
55.00.*
40.00
JEAN LEI_
CLASS REFUND
23- 3500 - 000 -00
.40.00 •
-
36.00
JAN BROYER-
CLERICAL FEE
23- 3500 - 000 -00
36.00
20.00
LOIS BE:CH
CLERICAL FEE
23- 3500 - 000 -00
4.00-
LOIS BECH
CLASS REFUND
23 -3800- 000 -00
4.00-
LOIS 3ECH
CLASS REFUND
23- 3800 - 000 -00
12.00 *-
1.723.02
OERN31 Coy•
DUE HRA
10- 1145 - 000 -00
19723.02
244.72
SHERIFFS )EPT
ROOM B 80ARO
10 -4286- 220 -22
244.72
_
-- -
-- * * * -CKS
32.00
CAROL'4ENfGES
REFUND
28- 3415 - 000 -00
32.00 •
73.40
NADE4 INDJSTREIS
CON_T:REPAIRS
28 -4248- 708 -70
73.40 t
390.65
HOLNST_N :RINKNASTER
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 708 -70
390.65
141.48
E Z SHARP
GEN SUPPLIES
28 -4504- 708 -70
141.48 •
30.00
CARAL 3UR44STER
REFUND
28- 3415- 000 -00
30.00 •
30.00
EDINA HOCCEY ASSN.
REGISTRATION FEE
10 -2240- 000 -00
30.,00 ! - -
- - -.
8009000.00
FIRST.BANK -RPLS
BONDS PAYABLE
66 -2060- 000 -00
2079075.00
FIRST_.BANi(,NP.LS.
UNAPP- SURPLUS
66 -2490- 000 -00
1900791i75.00 *
_.-
50.00 _ -
-_ BECKIE RO ;r_RS
DATCARE
10- 4200 - 280 -28
50.00.*
- - - -- - -
-- - - - - -
55.00.,.
ANTJE BIL "•UTAY.
CLASS REFUND
23 -3500- 000 -00
•
•
a
a
a
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -26 -85 PAGE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENOOt
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
55.00 r
335778
11/26/85
40.00
INTER 4SS1
OF
SUBSCRIBTION
10- 4204 - 420 -42
�.I^I
40.00 •
�
336779
11/26/85
30.00
MN CHIEFS
OF POLICE
DUES
10 -4204- 420 -42
30.00 •
/
rrrrrr
*r * —CKS
7579107.89
FUND 10
TOTAL
GENERAL -FUND
1
409161.15
FUID 15
TOTAL
DORKING CAPITAL FUND
914.45
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART•CENTER
1349597.72
FUND 27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
139694.79
FUID 28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
638.40
FUND 29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
4„''
291389816 -33
FUVD 40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
19752.08
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
1189944.29
FUND 60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
`
191069061.17
FUND 66
TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION 02
Computer Checks Ps 67311
'
493139288.27
TOTAL
67462
I
V
1
i
`
%w
_
fif+f�I1l.L I„ �.� �. D.:7F —J
to
n
.n
__-
b 'a
1
40 i-
-
- - - - -
.__..._
......