HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-12-16_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 16, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
EDINA MASONIC LODGE PRESENTATION - Robert Leistikow
COMMENDATION - Explorer David Reker
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Marion Ward
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and the Special Meeting of
December 9, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by- motion of seconded
by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four -fifth (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence -
Grandview Development Corporation - Lots 1, 2, 3, & 12, Block 1,
Grandview Plateau (5212 Vernon Avenue) - Generally located west of
Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Richard Steiner and Robert Gislason - Lots 41 and 42, Block 2, South
Harriet Park 2nd Addition - Generally located east of Minnehaha Blvd
and south of West 52nd Street
C. Final Development Plan
1. Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 County Road No. 18 - Generally located east of
County Road No. 18, north of Crosstown Highway and south of Londonderry Rd
D. Lot Division
1. David Shank and Suzyn Ware - 4301 -05 W. 63rd Street
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III, AWARD OF BIDS
A. Six (6) 1986 Full -size Police Pursuit Vehicles
B. One (1) 1986 1/2 Ton Carryall, Nine Passenger, 4 -Wheel Drive
C. Two (2) Dump Trucks
D. Two (2) 1/2 Ton Pick -up Trucks
E. One (1) One -ton van
F. One (1) Triple Combination Pumper Fire Truck
G. Repair and Labor for Braemar Pavilion
H. Plow and Wing for Loader
I. Iron Removal Plant Diffuser Nozzles
J. Heater Replacement - 50th Street Liquor Store
K. Chairs - Braemar Club House
L. Carpeting - Braemar Club House
M. Electrical Work - Braemar Club House
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Tax Reform Threat to Tax - Exempt Status of Municipal Bonds
B. Release from Lien of Request to Transfer Assessments - Dewey Hill Second Addition
C. Hennepin County Committee Appointments - 1986
D. Council Work Calendar - 1986
E. AMM Proposed Addendum to Policies and Legislative Proposals
F. Mall of America & Fantasyworld
G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
H. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 16, 1985
Page 2
V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote.by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Designation of Director and Alternate Director - Suburban Rate Authority
B. Designation of Director and Alternate.Director - LOGIS
C. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1986
D. Resolution Relating to Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan; Giving Preliminary
Approval to Issuance of Tax Increment Bonds
E. Resolution Authorizing the Sale and Issuance of Multifamily Mortgage
Revenue Bonds (Biltmore Project), of the City, for the Purpose of Financing
A Multifamily Rental Mortgage, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary
Documents
VI. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading:
Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. Ordinance No. 121 -A6 - An:Ordinance.Amending Ordinance No. 121 to Revise
Severance Pay Benefits
B. Ordinance No. 171 -A22 - Amending Ordinance No. 171 To Add Fee for
Dog License Renewal
VII. FINANCE
A. Statement of Estimated Expenditures and Recommended Transfers
B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment of the
following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/16/85: General Fund $206,037.29,
Art Center $1,801.77, Swimming Pool Fund $162.24, Golf Course Fund $33,858.61,
Recreation Center Fund $11,130.35, Gun Range Fund $457.99, Utility Fund
$385,727.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund $53,078.49, Construction Fund $336,205.21,
IMP Bond Redemption #2 $7,266.00, Total $1,035,725.54; and for confirmation
of payment of the following claims dated 11/30/85: General Fund $143,318.42,
Park Dept. $56.71, Art Center $802.69, Swimming Pool Fund $1,219.13, Golf
Course Fund $5,418.79, Recreation Center Fund $9,077.93, Gun Range Fund
$494.18, Utility Fund $21,152.96, Liquor'Dispensary Fund $199,399.63,
Construction Fund $20,346.08, Total $401,286.52.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Dec 30 Year -End Council Meeting
Mon Jan 6 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Jan 20 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY
Sat Jan 25 Special Council Meeting - Comprehensive Plan
5:00 P.M. Conference Rm
7:00 P.M. Council Room
CITY HALL CLOSED
8:30 A.M. Conference Rm
Mon Jan 27 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 16, 1985
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
EDINA MASONIC.LODGE PRESENTATION - Robert Leistikow
COMMENDATION- Explorer David Reker
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Marion Ward
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of December 2, 1985, and the. Special Meeting of
December 9, 1985, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of seconded
by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. Zoning Ordinance:
First and Second Hearing requires four -fifth (4/5) favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four -fifth (4/5)
favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to.pass. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required
to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Three - fifths
(3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Zoning Change
1. Second Reading
a. PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors Residence -
Grandview Development Corporation - Lots 1. 2, 3, & 12, Block 1,
Grandview Plateau (5212 Vernon Avenue) - Generally located west of
Vernon Avenue.and south of West 52nd Street
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Richard Steiner and Robert Gislason - Lots 41 and 42, Block 2, South
Harriet Park 2nd Addition - Generally located east of Minnehaha Blvd
and south of West 52nd Street
C. Final Development Plan
1. Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 County Road No. 18 - Generally located east of
County Road No. 18, north of Crosstown Highway and south of Londonderry Rd
D. Lot Division
1. David Shank and Suzyn Ware - 4301 -05 W. 63rd Street
;II• SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
AWARD OF BIDS
A. Six (6) 1986 Full -size Police Pursuit Vehicles
B. One (1) 1986 1/2 Ton Carryall, Nine Passenger, 4 -Wheel Drive
C. Two (2) Dump Trucks
D. Two (2) 1/2 Ton Pick -up Trucks
E. One (1) One -ton van
F. One (1) Triple Combination Pumper Fire Truck..
G. Repair and Labor for-Braemar Pavilion
H. Plow and Wing for.Loader
I. Iron Removal Plant Diffuser Nozzles
J. Heater Replacement - 50th Street Liquor Store
K. Chairs - Braemar Club House
L. Carpeting - Braemar Club House
M. Electrical Work - Braemar Club House
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Tax Reform Threat to Tax - Exempt Status of Municipal Bonds
B. Release from Lien of Request to Transfer Assessments - Dewey Hill Second Addition
C. Hennepin County Committee Appointments - 1986
D. Council Work Calendar - 1986
E. AMM Proposed Addendum to Policies and Legislative Proposals
F. Mall of America & Fantasyworld
G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
H. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 16, 1985
Page 2
V. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
A. Designation of Director and Alternate Director - Suburban Rate Authority
B. Designation of Director and Alternate Director - LOGIS
C. Designation of Official Newspaper for 1986
D. Resolution Relating to Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan; Giving Preliminary
Approval to Issuance of Tax Increment Bonds
E. Resolution.-Authorizing the Sale and Issuance of Mul-tifamily._Mortgage
Revenue Bonds (Biltmore Project), of the City, for the Purpose of Financing
A Multifamily Rental Mortgage, and Authorizing the Execution of Necessary
Documents
VI.. ORDINANCES. First Reading:. Requires only offering of Ordinance. Second Reading:
Three - fifths (3/5) favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Four - fifths (4/5) favorable rollcall
vote of all members of Council required to pass.
A. Ordinance No. 121 -A6 - An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 121 to Revise
.Severance Pay Benefits
B. Ordinance No. 171 -A22 - Amending Ordinance No. 171 To Add Fee for
Dog License Renewal
VII. FINANCE
A. Statement of Estimated Expenditures and Recommended Transfers
B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for payment of the
following claims as per Pre -List dated 12/16/85: General Fund $206,037.29,
Art Center $1,801.77, Swimming Pool Fund $162.24, Golf Course Fund $33,858.61,
Recreation Center Fund $11,130.35, Gun Range Fund $457.99, Utility Fund
$385,727.59, Liquor Dispensary Fund $53,078.49, Construction Fund $336,205.21,
IMP Bond Redemption 462 $7,266.00, Total $1,035,725.54; and for confirmation
of payment of the following claims dated 11 /30/85: General Fund $143,318.421,
Park Dept. $56.71, Art Center $802.69, Swimming Pool Fund $1,219.13, Golf
Course Fund $5,418.79, Recreation Center Fund $9,077.93, Gun Range Fund
$494.18, Utility Fund $21,152.96, Liquor Dispensary Fund $199,399.63,
Construction Fund $20,346.08, Total $401,286.52.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Dec 30 Year -End CouncilMeeting
Mon Jan 6 Regular Council Meeting
Mon Jan 20 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY.
Sat Jan 25 Special Council Meeting - Comprehensive Plan
5:00 P.M. Conference Rm
7:00 P.M. Council Room
CITY HALL CLOSED
8:30 A.M. Conference Rm
Mon Jan 27 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Council Room
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 2,, 1985
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 18, 1985 were.approved as corrected
and the Minutes of the Special Meeting of November 13, 1985 were approved as
submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Bredesen.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 23 AND PART OF LOT 22 =, EDINA HIGHLANDS
(BARBARA FELLER)- DENIED BASED ON FINDINGS, DECISIONS AND REASONS. Planner Craig
Larsen recalled that the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for a sub-
division of Lot 23 and the north 103.5 feet of Lot 22, Edina Highlands was held
at the Council Meeting of November 18, 1985. At that meeting the Council had
requested that staff prepare draft findings, decisions and reasons. Mr. Larsen
advised that the findings would support denial of the subdivision. No comment
being heard, Member Bredesen made a motion to deny the proposed subdivision as
recommended by the Community Development and Planning Commission, based on the
Findings, Decisions and Reasons as presented by staff (copy attached). Motion
was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded
by Member Turner, setting December 16, 1985 as hearing date for the following
planning matters:
1) Zoning Change - PRD -4 Planned Residence District to PSR -4 Planned Seniors
District and Preliminary Plat Approval - Grandview Development Company
2) Final Development Plan - Honeywell, Inc. - 5901 So. County Road 18
3) Preliminary Plat Approval - Steiner, Gilason - 4301 -05 W. 62nd Street -
Lots 41 and 42, South Harriet Park.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT GRANTED CONDITIONALLY FOR EDINBOROUGH ADDITION.
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on
file. Engineer Fran Hoffman explained that the Edina HRA has,petitioned the
City to vacate a utility easement along the west lot.line of three underlying
lots in the Edinborough Addition plat. Northern States Power Company (NSP) has
approved the vacation subject to an easement being granted to protect the
existing overhead line serving the MNDOT highway lights. Mr. Hoffman suggested
that NSP be contacted regarding the relocation of the overhead line. Staff
would therefore recommend that the utility easement be vacated, subject to
final relocation of the NSP facility. No objections being heard, Member
Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject
to it not,being recorded until after the NSP facility has been relocated:
RESOLUTION VACATING
EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 4th day of November, 1985
fixed a - -date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for utility
purposes; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published.and posted notice of said hearing was given and
the hearing was held on the 2nd day of December, 1985, at which time all persons
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said easement vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects.the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning
or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation,
to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following described easement is hereby vacated:
Utility easement shown in the plat for Meadow Lane II Addition on that
part of Lots 11, 12, 13, Block 1, Meadow Lane II Addition lying westerly
and southwesterly of the centerline of York. Avenue South;
12/2/85
and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of comple-
tion of,:.proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County
Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 412.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall•
.Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR SNOW PLOW CUTTING EDGES. Mr. Rosland presented bid for snow plow
cutting.edges showing Paper Calmenson at $5,453.47 (Hennepin County low bid). and
recommended award thereof. Motion of Member Bredesen-was seconded by Member
Richards for award of bid for snow plow cutting edges to Paper Calmenson at
$5,453.47.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards,.Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.,..
BID AWARDED FOR HANDICAPPED RESTROOM FOR EDINA ART CENTER. Mr. Rosland presented
tabulation of bids for a handicapped accessible restroom in the lower level of the
Edina Art Center showing Peak Construction Company at $8,675, Crawford -Merz
Construction Company at $8,900 and Lars Hassel Construction at $9,000. Member
Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen for award of bid to recommended
low bidder, Peak Construction Company, at $8,675.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ON -SALE WINE LICENSE APPROVED FOR EMPRESS RESTAURANT. Mr. Rosland stated that
the on -sale wine license application for the Empress Restaurant has been investi-
gated by the Police, Health and Planning Departments and that issuance of an
on -sale wine license is recommended conditioned upon approval by the State of
Minnesota., No, comment being,heard, Member Turner made a motion to.approve the
issuance of an on -sale wine license to the Empress Restaurant. Motion for approval
was seconded by Member Richards.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Richards commented that at the end of the first year of wine licensing
we obtain.feedback from the licensees as to the process. Member Turner added
that she would like to see what impact wine licenses have had on neighborhoods
and on cost to the City to see if we have missed anything in the way the ordinance
was written. Mr. Rosland said that we could look at those issues after the first
year of licensing.
.(Member Kelly entered the meeting at.this point-on the agenda - 7:10 p.m.)
AMM STUDY OF METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE REVIEW PROCESS DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
recalled that the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) will be
studying the Metropolitan Significance Review process which is conducted by the
Metropolitan Council for proposed developments that will affect the metro area,
and that at its last meeting, the City Council indicated the need to discuss
the MSR process as to offering comments to the AMM.regarding Edina's recent
experience with the Homart Development. In response, a memorandum relating the
Homart experience and analyzing the procedure has been prepared for Council's
review. The Council Members then discussed issues which were identified in the
Homart experience including segmentation and exemption, unwillingness of the
Metropolitan Council to accept the responsibility for making a decision, the
role of the Metropolitan Council and the cost to Edina in pursing the MSR process.
It was agreed that staff draft a letter for the Mayor's signature conveying the
Council's comments to the AMM, the Metropolitan Council Chair, with copies to
our state legislators.
1986 COUNCIL WORK PLAN REVIEWED. Mr. Rosland asked for the Council's comments
regarding the 1986 Council Work Plan that was distributed to them recently.
He stated that a Council calendar is being prepared which will reflect meeting
dates, etc. After some discussion, it was informally agreed that the timetable
for the issue of services and service levels should be advanced so that the
Council could develop and adopt policies on the issue before the 1987 Budget
hearings. With regard to the issue of the role of the City Council, the matter
of a facilitator for the Council workshop was discussed and it was suggested
that staff obtain other names of individuals who might serve in that capacity.
It was concluded.that the Council approved the 1986 Council Work plan as presented
with the exception that the timetable for the services and service levels be
advanced as suggested.
.0 -
12/2/85
RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED FOR PLAN APPROVAL /AGREEMENT /STATE-AID FUNDING FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNALS AT COUNTY HWY NO. 18 AND LONDONDERRY DRIVE. Mr. Hoffman explained
that it is necessary for the Council to -adopt various resolutions for plan
approval and agreement for participation in construction of traffic signals
at County Road 18 and Londonderry Road and for the appropriation of municipal
State Aid funds. The estimated City participation is $34,200.00 with $17,100.00
being a regular State Aid funding and $17,100.00 of State Aid funding appropriated
to be expended on the county road system. He pointed out thAt Hennepin County
will fund $34,200.00 as their normal participation. Member Bredesen thereupon
introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Plans for Hennepin County Project No. 8420 showing proposed traffic
control signal installation at County State Aid Highway No. 18 and Londonderry
Drive, within the limits of the City as a State Aid Project, have been prepared
and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED that said plans be in all things approved.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Agreement for participation in the construction and operation of traffic
control signal system on County State Aid Highway No. 18 at Londonderry Drive,
Hennepin County Project No. 8420, Agreement No. PW 26 -11 -85 has been prepared
and presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED, that said Agreement be in all things approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and Manager are authorized to sign
Agreement No. PW 26- 11 -85, Hennepin County Project No. 8420.
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDS
TO. C.S.A.H. PROJECT
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to
participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 18
within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Department of Highways
and identified in its records as 27- 618 -54, M.S.A.P. 142- 128 -05, M.S.A.P.
120- 161 -02;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal
State Aid Street Funds the sum of $17,100,00 to apply toward the construction of
said project and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve this authori-
zation.
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolutions adopted.
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEMBER AT LARGE APPOINTMENTS FOR 1986 DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
called the Council's attention to a list of all member -at -large appointments
for Hennepin County committees that are due to expire in 1986 and asked for
comments or recommendations. Member Turner asked that Manager call the two
Edina residents, Raymond O'Connell (Library Board) and Jim McWethy (Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District Board) to see if they are interested in another term
and if they so indicated to then draft a letter for the Mayor's signature
recommending their re- appointment to the Hennepin County Board. Member Turner
mentioned that a vacancy exists on the Community Action for Suburban Hennepin
Board (CASH) for an elected official. Member Kelly and Mayor Courtney said
they may be interested in the position. No formal action was taken.
AMENDMENT TO JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT /SWSCC APPROVED. Mr. Rosland
advised that when the Joint and Cooperative Agreement was entered into by
each of the cities in the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission for operation
of the joint cable franchise, each community was to contribute $2,500.00
with the balance of the costs to be split proportionately. This initial
annual contribution was inadvertently overlooked and the cities now are re-
quested to approve an amendment to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement to
provide for this contribution. Member Bredesen introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that is hereby
approves the First Amendment to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement
now existing and entered into between the Cities of Edina, Eden Prairie,
Minnetonka, Richfield and Hopkins, Minnesota, to create the Southwest
Suburban Cable Commission;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby directed and
authorized to execute the First Amendment for the City of Edina.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Abstained: Richards
Resolution adopted.
12/2/85
SNOW PLOWING FOLLOWING RECENT STORM COMMENDED. Member Kelly commended the City's
snow plowing crews for their efforts following the Thanksgiving weekend storm.
Member :Richards concurred that they had done an excellent job. He reported that
he had "received a request from Jim Grotz, 5513 Park Place, to have Dever Drive
plowed. Mr. Rosland said that staff would take care of it and would contact
Mr. Grotz. He also commended.the crews for an excellent job of snow plowing,
and commented that they are a dedicated group of employees far beyond the norm.
TAX REFORM.THREAT TO TAX - EXEMPT STATUS OF MUNICIPAL BONDS NOTED. Mr. Rosland
called the Council's attention to memorandums from the League of Minnesota Cities
regarding a tax reform threat to tax - exempt status of municipal bonds and
suggested that the Council Members discuss this issue at their December 16 meeting.
No formal action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED REGARDING EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD TERMS AND ELIGIBILITY.
Mr. Rosland recalled that at the Council Meeting of July 1, 1985, James Van
Valkenburg, President of The Edina Foundation, had been present and explained
that the Board was attempting to clarify the membership selection and terms of
the Foundation's,Board of Directors. The Council had at that meeting passed a
motion that the Bylaws be amended to allow persons who live or work in Edina to
serve on the Board and that the terms be staggered so that in any given year one
representative each from the Council, the School Board and the membership be
appointed. Mr. Rosland stated that -a draft resolution reflecting the Council's
and the School Board's views had been prepared and recommended adoption thereof.
Member Turner said that she had been informed that at its recent meeting the
School Board had approved the resolution with the provision that all nine directors
live in the City of Edina on a 5 to 1 vote. Following considerable discussion on
the residency issue, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation Board of Directors on November 7, 1985, did reaffirm
its position regarding membership and appointment thereto of the Board of Dir-
ectors; and
WHEREAS, it is the intention of The Edina Foundation that its members be selected
as follows:
1. Three (3) to be appointed by the Chair of the Edina School Board with the
advice and consent of the Edina School Board.
2. Three (3) to be appointed by the Mayor of Edina with the advice and consent
of the Edina City Council.
3. Three (3) to be appointed as members at large by the six (6) appointed in
one and two above.
WHEREAS, The Edina Foundation has further resolved that Article III. Section 3.02
of the By -Laws of The Edina Foundation be amended as follows:
"Section 3.02. Number, Qualification and Term of Office. The number of
directors shall be nine (9). The number of directors may be increased or
decreased to any odd number, but not less than three (3) by vote of the
Board of Directors of the corporation, but any change in the number of
Directors shall receive the approval, by Resolution, of the City Council of
the City of Edina and the School Board of Independent School District
Number 273 before such change becomes effective._
The Directors currently serving,
are as follows:
A. School Board of Independent
1. Kay Bach
2. Marilou Birkeland
3. Glenn C. Smith
B. City Council of the City of
1. Robert Sherman
2. James Van Valkenburg
3. John Skagerberg
C. Appointed-by the Directors of
1. Lyle Bing
2. Betty Hemstad
3. R. Bruce Kobs
their terms, and entity appointing them
School District Number 273:
1986
1987
1988
Edina:
1986
1987
1988
The Foundation:
1986
1987
1988
All subsequent directors shall be appointed or reappointed for three (3) year
terms.
Each Director shall hold office until the third annual meeting of the members
next following his or her selection, or election, and until his or her
successor shall be elected and shall qualify, or until he or she shall have
been removed in a manner hereinafter provided.
No person shall be eligible to serve more than ten (10) consecutive years
as a Director of this corporation, and upon completion of a period of service
as a Director of this corporation, a person may not again serve as a Director
within one year.
12/2/85
Persons who would be'described in Section 4946(z)(1)(A) or (C) through
(G) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted or as here-
after amended, if this corporation were a "private foundation" as defined
in Section 509 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as now enacted
or as hereafter amended, shall never constitute more than one -third of
the Directors of this corporation; and such persons, together with
representatives of banks or trust companies which serve as trustees,
investment advisors, custodians, or agents for or with respect to funds
of or held for the benefit of this corporation, shall never constitute
more than one -half of the Directors of this corporation.
The nine (9) Directors shall be residents of Edina."
WHEREAS, Article XIII of the By -Laws of The Edina.Foundation provides that
no amendment of Section 3.02 shall be made without the approval, by resolution,
of both the School Board of Independent School District Number 273 and the City
Council of the City of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
it hereby approves the.amendment to Section 3.02 as stated heretofore; and
BE FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to The Edina
Foundation for inclusion in its corporate records.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly, Richards
Resolution adopted.
TAX FORFEITED LANDS DECLARED "NON- CONSERVATION AND FOR SALE ". Mr. Rosland
presented Hennepin County's List of Tax Forfeited Land dated October 9, 1985,
Report No. P1421101, advising that the City has no interest in acquiring any
of the parcels. Member Turner thereupon introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RF.SOUTTTON
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the
State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list is dated
October 9, 1985, Report No. P1421101; and
WHEREAS, each parcel,of land described in said list has heretofore been classi-
fied by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota as non -
conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized by said
Board of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to Minn-
esota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board of County
Commissioners of each parcel of land described in said list as non - conservation
land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of each such parcel
of land be and the same is hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2 ADOPTED (EXPIRATION OF ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES); SECOND
READING WAIVED. Mr. Rosland explained that State Statute 320.11, Subd. 16
provides that all intoxicating liquor licenses issued by a municipality shall
expire on the same date and that to accomplish this it is recommended that
the City adopt an amendment to Ordinance No. 902 whereby every intoxicating
liquor license shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on the July-1 following its date of
issuance. He noted that the country clubs have been advised of this change by
letter and have also been told of the increase of fee necessitated by the
issuance of on -sale wine licenses. No comment being heard, Member Bredesen
introduced the following ordinance and moved its adoption, with waiver of
Second Reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO
PROVIDE THAT ANNUAL ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSES
SHALL EXPIRE ON THE 1ST DAY OF JULY FOLLOWING THE
DATE OF ISSUANCE THEREOF
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Sec. 9 of Ordinance No. 902 is amended by adding the following
thereto:
"Every license issued under this Sec. 9 shall expire at 12:01 A.M. on
the July 1 following its date of issuance. Licenses which have been duly
issued pursuant to this Sec. 9 and which are scheduled to terminate on
April 1, 1986, may be extended by the City Council so as to have a termination
12/2/85
date of 12:01 A.M. on July 1, 1986, provided that a request for extension
shall be accompanied by all application data, fees, bonds, and certificates
of insurance required by this ordinance for the issuance of a license.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly for payment
of the following claims dated 12/2/85: General Fund $757,107.89, Working Capital
Fund $30,761.15, Art Center $914.45, Golf Course Fund $134,597.72, Recreation
Center Fund $13,694.79, Gun Range Fund $638.40, Utility Fund $2,138,816.33,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,752.08, Construction Fund $118,944.29, IMP Bond
Redemption #2 $1,106,061.17, Total $4,313,288.27.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meet-
ing adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
_ OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
,EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD DECEMBER 9, 1986
The Edina City Council held a Special Meeting on December 9, 1985 at 7:00 p.m.
at the Edina City Hall for the,'purpose of discussing and considering Accessory
Uses as allowed by City ordinances.
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Turner and Richards, who presided as
Mayor Pro -Tem.
COUNCIL WORK CALENDAR FOR 1986 DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland stated that according
to direction by the Council a proposed Council Work Calendar for 1986 has
been prepared to facilitate the 1986 Council Work Plan. Tentative dates were
discussed and informally agreed upon, following which staff was directed.to
prepare a calendar reflecting those dates to bring back to the Council at its
meeting of December 16, 1985.
YEAR -END COUNCIL MEETING DATE SET FOR DECEMBER 30, 1985. Motion of Member
Turner was seconded by Member Kelly setting December 30, 1985 at 5:00 p.m. as
the date for the Year -End Council Meeting.
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
ACCESSORY USES ALLOWED BY CITY ORDINANCES DISCUSSED. The Council Members
reviewed and discussed a comprehensive list of Accessory Uses now permitted by
City ordinances regarding structures and vehicles and permitted location. Staff
was directed to draft.language reflecting the discussion with regard to the
following: Dog /Pet Enclosure, Wind Generators & Solar Collectors, Emergency
Power Generators &.Air Conditioner Compressors, Skateboard Ramps, Playground
Equipment, Playhouses /Forts /Treehouses and Recreational Vehicles. Mr. Rosland
stated that the proposed language regarding these issues would be brought back
to the Council in early 1986 with suggested dates for public hearings thereon.
No formal action was taken.-
There being no further business on the agenda, the meeting was adjourned at
9:35 p.m.
City Clerk
LOCATaOH HAF z A i
�0-
J z
J
I
y
1
r�
am' I N rwq
if
N U M B E R Z -85 -3 Dunbar Development Corp.
L O C A T 10 N 5212 Vernon Avenue; Lots 1, 2, 3, & 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau
Generally located west of Vernon Avenue and south of W. 52nd Street.
REQUEST Final Rezoning Approval, PSR -4
Ilil 3� N
w ♦ TN ST
I
I
!1
(� U C I
r J
E DINA
'US UC
WORKS
:ENTER
ti
i
/ OUR LADY
OF GRACE
CATHOLIC SCHOOL ,�� ='
r
r,T r
HArONa , I
I.
DSOR Ay
i
K[ti,l
All
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MINUTES OF THE-R.E.
DECEMBER,.-A, 1985, AT 7:30 P.M
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman, William Lewis, Gordon Johns Del Johnson,
Helen McClelland, Phil Sked, John Ba' ey, John
Skagerberg, John Palmer, Virginia S w and Jane
Paulus.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
David Runyan
STAFF PRESENT:
Craig Larsen, City Plann
Fran Hoffman, City Eng' er
Jackie Hoogenakker, S etary
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINAPS:
Mr. John Palmer gFed for approval of the October 30,
1985 Community Devel ent and Planning Commission Meeting
minutes. Mr. John gerberg seconded the motion. All were
in favor. The mo n carried.
Mr. Del J on moved for approval of the minutes of
the September, , 1985 Board of Appeals and Adjustments
meeting. Mr it Sked seconded the motion. All were in
favor. Th tion carried.
Mr. n Palmer moved for approval of the minutes of
the Oc r 3, 1985 Board of Appeals and Adjustments
meeti Mr. Phil Sked seconded the motion. All were in
fav The motion carried.
Mrs. Virginia Shaw moved for approval of the minutes of
October 17, 1985 Board of Appeals and Adjustments
meeting. Mrs. Jane Paulus Secon P rho mn+ +r+•+ 'All in
II. OLD BUSINESS:
Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Company
5212 Vernon Avenue
P v Planned Residential District, PRD -4
to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4
n ,'
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission a preliminary
rezoning approval for the subject development was granted by
the City Council on August 19, following the Commissions
recommendation of July 31, 1985. The approval anticipated
152 rental apartment units designed for occupancy by
seniors.
Mr. Larsen pointed out that on November 4, the City
Council passed a bond inducement resolution which will allow
the developer to secure tax exempt financing for the
project.
Mr. Larsen added the proponents have submitted Final
Plans, including a site plan, floor plans, elevations;
grading and utility plan, and a landscaping plan in support
of their request for Final Rezoning approval.
Mr. Larsen continued that at the time of preliminary
approval the Commission and Council directed that certain
changes be made. In addition to a satisfactory
redevelopment contract, preliminary approval was conditioned
upon realignment of the access to Vernon and an increase in
the amount of underground parking. The Final Development
Plan illustrates the driveway access at right angles to
Vernon as recommended. Underground parking has been
increased from 76 to 94 spaces.
Mr. Larsen stated in addition to the mandated changes,
minor changes have been made to the building foot print,
unit plans, and common spaces. Overall floor area has
increased slightly while there has been a slight decrease in
total lot coverage. The changes can be attributed to design
refinement.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proponents have submitted
plans which respond well to criticisms of the preliminary
plan. Staff believes this will be a high quality
development and an asset to the community, and recommend
approval conditioned upon:
1. An executed Redevelopment Contract
2. Final Staff review of the landscaping plan.
3. A proof of parking agreement for surface parking.
Mr. Harry Olson, architect for Grandview Corporation
was present .
Mr. Palmer asked Mr. Larsen the setback distance of the
westerly corner due to the minor change in design. Mr.
Larsen using graphics said a 36 foot setback was required.
The proposed developmentl will have a 40 foot setback which
complies with the Ordinance of setback equaling height of
the structure.
Mr. Frank Dunbar, the Developer arrived.
Mr. John Palmer moved for approval of Final Rezoning
subject to staff conditions. Mr. John Bailey seconded the
motion. Mr. Gordon Johnson abstained. The motion carried.
S -85 -12 Richard Steiner and Robert ZioTason
Preliminary Plat Approval, 06ts 41,
and 42, Block 2, South Ha iet Park
2nd Addition
Mr. Larsen informed the Commiss' n the subject property
consists of two, individually /ee ed single dwelling
lots. Both lots are relativelw and exceptionally
deep, each measuring approxima feet by 400 feet.
Total area in the two lots is square feet.
Mr. Larsen stated the ividual owners have agreed to
a joint venture to propose four lot subdivision which
would create two, new bu' able lots. Lot 1 measures 78
feet in width, 119 feet n depth and contains 9,282 square
feet. Lot 2 woul/be feet wide, 119 feet deep, and would
contain 10,472 sqeet. Lots 3 and 4, for the existing
dwellings, would n 13,400 and 11,700 square feet
respectively.
Mr. Larsen ointed out the zoning Ordinance requires a
minimum lot de h of 120 feet. Since Lots 1 and 2 would
provide Zarsen 9 feet, a lot depth variance would be
requirednew lots would meet all other Zoning
Ordinancrements for single dwelling unit lots.
Mr. added that within the South Harriet Park
Subdivi on a lot width of approximately 60 feet seems
typic Lot depths within the two block area east of the
cree etween 52nd and 54th Street vary from 220 to over 400
fee Due to the path of the creek and the need to align
wi
1roads to the north, the lots in this area are unusually
d
Mr. Larsen concluded there is adequate property
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 4, 1985
Z -85 -3 Grandview Development Company
5212 Vernon Avenue
Planned Residential District, PRD -4
to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4
Refer to: Attached Final Development plans, project
summary by architect.
A preliminary rezoning approval for the subject
development was granted by the City Council on August 19,
following the Commissions recommendation of July 31, 1985.
The approval anticipated 152 rental apartment units designed
for occupancy by seniors.
On November 4, the City Council passed a bond
inducement resolution which will allow the developer to
secure tax exempt financing for the project.
The proponents have submitted Final Plans, including a
site plan, floor plans, elevations, grading and utility
plan, and a landscaping plan in support of their request for
Final Rezoning approval.
At the time of preliminary approval the Commission and
Council directed that certain changes be made. In addition
to a satisfactory redevelopment contract, preliminary
approval was conditioned upon realignment of the access to
Vernon and an increase in the amount of underground parking.
The Final Development Plan illustrates the driveway access
at right angles to Vernon 'as recommended. Underground
parking has been increased from 76 to 94 spaces.
In addition to the mandated changes, minor changes have
been made to the building foot print, unit plans, and common
spaces. Overall floor area has increased slightly while
there has been a slight decrease in total lot coverage. The
changes can be attributed to design refinement.
Recommendation
The proponents have submitted plans which respond well
to our criticisms of the preliminary plan. Staff believes
this will be a high quality development and an asset to the
community. We recommend approval conditioned upon:
1. An executed Redevelopment Contract
E•
2.
Final Staff
review
of the landscaping plan.
3.
A proof of
parking
agreement for surface parking.
r::
8/19/85
used by abroad segment of the Edina community and so a compromise must be worked
out. He,; said he liked the sugggese nL -Igb& t2t- he- =iparking�h Wooddale Park be
put along W. 5Qt - � et`if out of the park area. Regarding ley ,Park, Member
Bredese a agreed there should be no parking south of�A a tennis courts and
that he liked the idea of doing a mirror image for par i'uth of W. 50th Street
from the tennis courts over to Wooddale Avenue., a pointed out that it would
preserve a larger area of Utley for publi e and would help alleviate the parking
problem for the church. Member Bred e`11 added that he supports only 25 parking
spaces on the north side of W..:- Street. Mr. Rosland responded that staff has
looked at siting the par in Wooddale Park along W. 50th Street and presented .
a graphic illustrat.�ng that concept. He said it may be possible to re- configure
the parking pla "` or south of -the .tennis courts in.Utley Park along W. 50th
Street also Member Bredesen then made a motion to direct the staff to draft a
►
parking _�pi an for Wood dal ePar-k- aatang- W;-,E-5flth =5f'reet�''oi °ttie}'nort '��td ro the
tennis cow sWt'uale Avenue on the south to arrive at a compromise and to
bring the plan back to the Council on September 9. Motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen,'':;.Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR PSR -4 PLkNNED SENIORS RESIDENCE ZONING (ORDINANCE
V 1 NO. 825 -A8) FOR BILTMORE SITE, 5212 VERNON AVENUE. Affidavits of Notice were
(1� Vpresented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen
presented the petition for rezoning of the closed Biltmore Motel site, generally
�\ located west of Vernon Avenue and south of West 52nd Street. The 3.5 acre site
' is surrounded by single family properties to the north, R -2 District residences
to the west, commercial development across Vernon Avenue to the east, and multi -
family units further to the.west and immediate south. Mr. Larsen recalled that
the Council approved a Planned Residential District rezoning on the property in
the fall of 1985 for the construction of an 88 -unit, 4 story condominium project.
A new development team has acquired the property and has submitted a rezoning
request to Planned Seniors Residence, PSR -4 to allow the construction of a 152 -unit
building containing 4, 5 and 6 story sections. The building would contain 70 one
bedroom units, 74 two bedroom units and 8 three bedroom units. Exterior materials
would be.brick except for some trim. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum of
2,500 square of lot area per unit in PSR -4 with the possibility of reducing this
requirement to 1,000 square feet per unit through a series of allowances. The
proposed plan would be able to achieve the maximum allowance through credits for
underground parking, type I or II construction, accessibility to freeways, and
for providing senior citizen units. As a result the density as proposed conforms
to Ordinance requirements for the PSR -4 district. Mr. Larsen pointed out that
the Zoning Ordinance establishes special requirements for unit types, sizes and
for community facilities in a senior citizen apartment building. A variance to
Ordinance unit size requirements and a variance to allow 3 bedroom units would be
necessary. The Ordinance requires that parking be provided at a rate of .25
space per unit enclosed, and .5 space per unit surface parking. For a 152 -unit
building this results in 38 enclosed spaces and 76 surface spaces. The subject
proposal provides 76 enclosed spaces and 51 surface spaces. A variance for surface
spaces would be required. Traffic would access the site on Vernon Avenue opposite
the major intersection recommended by the Grandview Traffic Study for Link Road.
In PSR zoning district has no height limits; setbacks are determined by the height
of the building and the proposal does comply. Lot coverage in the PSR -4 District
allows a maximum building coverage of 35 %. The proposed building would cover 21%
as compared to 27% building coverage for the previous approved project on the site.
The project concept is to provide housing for seniors who are not eligible for the
HUD type housing with income limits. It would offer a high level of services to
residents such as meals provided on site, cleaning and laundry services, on call
nursing and emergency medical assistance and increased security. Mr. Larsen
noted several land use issues concerning this proposal: Height - the building
containd 4, 5 and 6 story sections with respective heights of 36, 45 and 54:feet.
The increased height allows a reduction in building coverage and provides shorter
corridors and a more efficient delivery of services. Properties most impacted
by the building's height are to the west along Grandview Lane. Setbacks along
this line vary from 45 to 90 feet compared to a constant 40 feet of the earlier
plan. Zoning - the City's PSR Zoning District was designed in response to HUD
requirements for Section 202 project. Since this project would not be controlled
by HUD it would be necessary for the City /HRA to limit occupancy. Staff believes
this could be accomplished through a redevelopment contract and deed restrictions.
Unit Sizes - The developers contend that their experience indicates a need to offer
slightly larger units with more bedroom options than HUD projects would allow.
The one and two bedroom units are within or very near Ordinance requirements;
the three bedroom units would not be allowed. Staff supports a variance to allow
the proposed unit sizes and unit mix provided the City can exercise control
8/19/85
over building occupancy. Parking and Traffic -'The Ordinance requires .75 park-
ing space per unit, of which .25 must be..enclosed in the PSR -4 District. The
proposal would provide .84 space per unit, of which .5 would be enclosed. The
most comparable existing project in the:City would seem to be 7500 York. Parking
provided at 7500 York.is nearly identical to the subject proposal with a total
parking ratio of .82, of .which .47 is enclosed. Management has indicated that
there is a waiting list for enclosed parking. The Community Development and
Planning Commission and staff suggests an increase in the amount of enclosed
parking. Regarding traffic, BRW, Inc. has done a study comparing the traffic
generation on this site in light of the Grandview Traffic Study and have
determined that this is the lowest possible traffic generator that the site
could have. Staff would suggest that the entry from Vernon Avenue be redesigned
at a right angle.to Vernon. The proposed location is shown in the Comprehensive
Plan.as suitable for elderly housing, and in staff's opinion represents an
excellent reuse of this property. The Planning Commission at its meeting of
July 31, 1985 recommended approval of the preliminary development plan withsan
increase in the underground parking, a proof of parking agreement to handle any
future shortage in surface parking and a realignment of the entry from Vernon
Avenue. Mr. Larsen stated that Frank Dunbar was present representing the deve-
lopment team. Mr. Dunbar introduced the members of the partnership called Grand -
vies Development Company, including Dale E. Barlage, Robert A. Johnson and himself.
Dunbar Development Company will be the entity assigned to implement the redevelop-
ment project. The partnership considered four factors in analyzing the develop-
ment potential of the Biltmore site: 1) propose a market acceptable program,
2) Develop an economically feasible building, 3) Respond to the goals and objectives
for the Redevelopment District Plan, and 4) Propose a development that is con-
sistent with the City's Land Use Plan. Various consultants were brought on the
development team to analyze those factors. Mr. Dunbar.explained that the history
of the site was reviewed and the team tried to respond to the concerns that were
expressed by the Council previously. He introduced Patricia A. McCullough, of
Health Planning and Management Resources, Inc., who presented graphics highlight -
ing the features of the market research that was done for the proposed project.
The market research concluded that the rental senior.retirement complex is a
marketable product and that there is very concrete evidence for potential demand
for the project. Peter Van Hauer, of Health Central Corporation, briefly stated
their credentials, the projects they have been involved in and advised that they
will be providing marketing services and post - construction management on behalf
of the owners and the occupants. He stated their philosophy is to support and
enhance an independent lifestyle to its fullest through the delivery of essential
support services. Wayne Winsor, of Winsor /Faricy Architects, Inc., was then
introduced as architect for the proposed project. Mr. Winsor pointed out design
features of the project: landscaping, exterior materials and features, and.floor
plans. Mr. Dunbar advised that they had met with neighborhood residents on
July 29, 1985 and concensus was that it was a proposal that was acceptable to
the community. He stated that the request before the Council is for rezoning and
concept approval. A financial analysis has been submitted requesting financial
participation by the .City in this redevelopment project in the amount of
$1,000,000. The objective was to request less than what the increment itself
could support so that the off -site improvements could be incorporated into the
bond sale. In conclusion, Mr. Dunbar requests the Council's support for these
reasons: 1) Development proposed addresses a market determined need in the
community and will prevent long -term citizens from leaving, 2) It allows for
revitalization of a current non - productive site in the redevelopment district,
3) It allows for the senior households to be converted over to younger families,
4) It provides for the best use on the site from the standpoint of market,
financing, traffic, and land useage, 5) It realized the objectives of the Grand-
view Redevelopment Program, and 6) It may provide the revitalization necessary
within the district to spur further development activities complementary to the
area and development plan. Mr. Dunbar stated they are prepared to enter into
a mutually agreed upon redevelopment contract and are prepared to expedite the
project. Member Turner asked what impact this request for City participation
would have on the other goals for the district. Mr. Larsen said if the City
.participates as requested, there would not be enough to do the public improve-
ments we looked at initially. Member Richards stated his understanding of the
financing was that the City would sell one million in bonds, do the improvements
and then from the capture of taxes the City would retire those bonds, and at
that point the City no longer is involved or has an interest in the project.
Mr. Dunbar said that was correct. Member Richards then asked what would happen
to the project is it does not receive Council approval for participation.
Mr. Dunbar responded that they do not feel they could proceed without parti-
cipation of the City and that they have not developed other alternatives. Jeff
Anderson, 5124 William Avenue, stated he was concerned about the height of the
building and that it was a very ambitious plan and questioned the ability of the
developers to carry it on into the future. Russ Moore, 5129 Bedford Avenue,
asked about the price range of the rental units. Mr. Dunbar stated that it is
a market rate rental proposal and that rents are anticipated to be in the range
8/19/85
of $800/850 for one bedroom units up to. $1,300 for three bedroom units. Floyd
Johnson, 5137 William Avenue, asked what would happen if it is not marketable
and it becomes just another apartment building. He said he was concerned about
possible traffic problems in the future and-"that there is a high population in
the immediate six block area now. Member Turner.asked if PSR -4 zoning limits
the age of residents and if we could restrict first choice of units to Edina
residents. Mr. Larsen said the Zoning Ordinance defines PSR -4 zoning for
occupancy by persons 62 years of age or over. Mr. Erickson explained that in
the Edinborough project we asked that preference be given. to Edina citizens but
only to the extent that it can be done without violating some federal /state
regulations and the City could require that for this project also. He reviewed
for the Council the City participation in the elderly housing for Edinborough.
Member Turner stated she supports the land use and rezoning request because it
is a good re -use of the property, it meets the Comprehensive Plan and the Grand-
view Redevelopment District goals. She added that there is not enough suppor.t:-.6t
for the degree of City participation being requested but would be willing to
look at some lesser degree.of support. Member Bredesen said he felt it was a
good prdject for the district; that what might done on that site with no public
support might be less satisfactory than what is proposed, so that there is some
public benefit that comes not withstanding the fact that the project will produce
an increment for the district. He added that the City is committed to a long
range strategy aimed at getting young families into the community, that this
type of facility will encourage the elderly to move out of their homes in Edina
to free up the housing stock and that the project will in turn provide housing
for those people who have incomes of $20,000 or more that don't qualify for
subsidized housing. Member Kelly stated that she was concerned about the City's
participation in the project, that it would preclude some other development for
the district. That, although it is a good project for the site, she did not feel
it would cause homes to be turned over to younger families as it is anticipated
that the market for the units will be 1/3 from people returning from the sun
belt and 1/3 from parents of Edina citizens, and that we should take a stronger
approach to bring in younger families with second mortgage monies or some other
strategy rather than this kind of project. Mayor Courtney said he felt it was
a fine project for the area but that he too was troubled with the amount of the
City participation requested; that this is a new experience to subsidize housing
but that perhaps that time has come. Member Turner pointed out that the Metro-
politan Council, the Citizens League and the State have all been discussing the
issue of long term care of the elderly and they have all suggested that this
kind of housing be made available so that there is not unnecessary use of nursing
homes. This type of project would provide an in- between stage for the elderly
with some of the support services which is much less costly for all taxpayers.
Mr. Rosland stated that staff is studying the rest of the tax increment district
and that some of the Council's questions may be answered with that study regard-
ing other project within the district. Mr. Erickson pointed out that the Council
is being asked to approve the zoning, that City participation is another question
and would addressed when the redevelopment contract is approved. Member Turner
stated that the proponents should understand that some of the Council members
are concerned.about the degree of City participation. Member Turner then
introduced Ordinance No. 825 -A8 for First Reading, subject to: 1) execution of
a satisfactory redevelopment contract, 2) increased enclosed parking as recom-
mended by staff, and 3) realignment of the driveway as recommended by staff, as
follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PSR -4 PLANNED SENIORS RESIDENCE
FROM PRD -4, PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Seniors Residence District (Sub- District PSR -4)
is enlarged by the addition of the following property:
Lots 1, 2, 3, and 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau, and that part of the
Service Road originally dedicated in the plat of GRANDVIEW PLATEAU,
according to the recorded plat thereof, described as follows:
Beginning at the northeast corner of Block 1, said GRANDVIEW PLATEAU,
thence on an assumed bearing of East along the easterly extension of
the north line of said Block 1, a distance of 33.50 feet; thence
southwesterly a distance of 326.96 feet along a nontangential curve,
concave to northwest having a radius of 3087.95 feet and a central
angle of 6 degrees 04 minutes, said curve has a chord bearing of
South 21 degrees 58 minutes West; thence South 25 degrees West to
the southeasterly line of said Block 1; thence northeasterly along
said Block 1 to the point of beginning.
The extent of the PRD -4 Planned Residence District is reduced by removing the
property described above from the PRD -4 District."
8/19/85
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Member Richards commented that he would support the motion but saw no reason to
believe that the subject property would not develop totally in the private
sector and therefore could not support public participation in the project.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed "on file. Mr. Larsen presented
the request for preliminary plat approval for Indian Hills 3rd Addition, generally
1 o c so,� ,o the r,ossto Highwayand:,west of Gleason Road. He recalled
that the Council granted final plat approva t�o`Iriiiin'`$i] 1 °s2nd'Add_ Wit: on in
April, 1985. The plat consisted of 7 R -2 lots along McCauley Trail and -1 lots
on a new cul -de -sac extending south from McCauley Trail. Since that time1h
, e
proponent has acquired Lot 11 of The Timbers and is requesting a subdivision which
would add portions of this lot to the R -1 lots in Indian Hills 2nd Addf'ion. No
new lots are contemplated by this plat. Lots 1 through 7 remain unch'a'nged from
the previously approved plat. Mr. Larsen stated that Lot 11 of Toe Timbers is an
extremely large neck lot which has access to Timber Ridge Road.` The ot also has
frontage on Arrowhead Lake. The proposed plat would add appr`ximately 75 feet
of depth to Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12, and would provide lake - access to Lots 13 and 14.
A large irregularly shaped piece would be added to Lot.84y the proposed plat.
The remaining lot from The Timbers, which would become Lot 16 of Indian Hills
3rd Addition, would continue to provide a large bu''ding site. Mr. Larsen
pointed out that at the time The Timbers plat was approved a deed restriction
was placed on Lot 11 which prevented further q66divisions which would create
additional building sites. This restrictio would need to be released prior to
recording the new plat. Staff supports e concept of the proposed preliminary
plat as the proposal greatly enhances the potential of .the lots along Timber
Trail while causing no harm to Lot 1fi_as a building site. The proposal also
represents s more efficient use of; roperty. Mr. Larsen said that a revised
grading plan has been submitted Xa _ ich is satisfactory and some of the lot lines
have been corrected as suggested by staff. The Community Development and Planning
Commission gave preliminary. _approval at its meeting of July 31, 1985 and staff
would recommend approval ,s bject to release of the deed restriction on Lot 11 of
The Timbers. Mr. Larsen`ioted that the conservation restriction on Lots 13
Lots 13 and 14 which #6t.Arrowhead Lake would remain. Frank Matthews, 6400
Timber Ridge, said h9/felt the enlarged lots are favorable and asked if the
roadways of Timber -Ridge and Timber Trail would be connected in any way.
Mr. Larsen said there are no plans to connect them. There being no further
.,V
comment, Member�'rurner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED
FOR INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
BE IT RESQ VED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain, -dlat entitled "Indian Hills 3rd Addition ", platted by Gustafson and
Associates, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 16,
1985-;%e and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Mot on for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
ollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR 7711 NORMANDALE ROAD (EDINA CARWASH) PCD -4
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented the request for final development
lane approval for 7711 Normandale Road, generally located east.--of Highway 100:.,
and north +�;.o est 78th Street. The subject property measures 175 feet by 175
feet, contains r, -62fi- square feet, and is zoned Planned Commercial District,
-PCD -4. The property is developedkwith an authomobile service center, which
offers gasoline sales, parts and service.`"`- he_ =proponent is requesting approval
of a Final Development Plan to redevelop the site aas a_'ar. wash, with related
car cleaning service and gasoline sales. Mr. Larsen explained =-that the Plan
would require the granting of a number of variances. Car washes` required
to maintain a 45 foot setback from both the front street and any side street.
The proposed plan would maintain a 45 foot setback from Viking Drive, but
would maintain a 35 foot setback from West 78th Street. Thus a 20 foot side
street setback variance is requested. The Zoning Ordinance requires that
parking maintain a 20 foot setback from a street and 10 feet from an interior
side lot line. Parking is proposed within 8 feet of West 78th Street, conse-
quently, a 12 foot parking setback variance is also requested. On the north-
easterly portion of the site a 5 foot parking setback variance would be required.
PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN
90.1.: 1 na.. a fly
of
h.��w yIJ- pI10_�I P.w r.
Mr
SENIORS
CONGREGATE
HOUSING
EDINA. MINNESOTA
FOR GRANDVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
SITE PLAN
I
''
�"
. -N.•IU -
scout" /■"cs
I. -..: a
.w
I
�.•rlto.ral-
WEST 63RD STREET
T
PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
coos
.T
C . PA"
MIA.." NAM
utt
I'M
A
�l
M Yt•"1
M NWl•
.•
Y.
Y
Nt Kvw __ —. _.
w•l ft. mV
nlf
M
NM .rtl),I. Mw.
IIM.NII LN»FM
fI
A.
N
■
1
•wt'Ni mows owU
4t. r R4VI.IfNM
!
M
A
Nf
•
LN'
N
.
■
R.Y am
mnUwVN
iM
b
A
/
+.VAIN 10.1.1900 r
w..r7wMUrsw L4YIINIM
tW
M
I
.1.A"I"
waw •x rww•
We
a
■
A
W ALr &MAN "'m
w..w nri4f- u.t—
V'
A
�
n
r1wY.IW nnL4
nM 4J1.1. V.ww.•
Y
b
■
m
1 .m rourr
r..�i.n 1n.nnlew. Iuv.wr.A
u'
ror
■
1.
"/i•4 rIwtAM11
urwuwwrt /av/�r�.rn
.•
�r
.
�••
4^w i,y
v.�I«M w11Y1 Y4f1+1w
K
1.1
r
A
.U.1V ..swf /.NN...
"Y.MVIpAU, .w/M.rw
.t
wrr
xs.t..1
.vw1••.'
.s..•1 f"MAtl
/
wr
■
s/
r.1NMr.I.r.w waA
"«1 Ew1• A w w
.•
.N
.
«
Mr/ 1.r.N.
—.—n. w"Al
n•
wx
."tL wpA dA
NwYRY01) Id1•.LLVIAMA
tI
R-r
•
M
a/Y•Y +wN`I
4IIIr1. (t/.Kr7 NV.11
1.•
w.f
•
.NR aw",
AwrAAn Y.IN YA.pN
M•
w.r
■
M
.1"N.1.•1 .rw~
AV-" . ^ r.tY••tm
t••
fs(
PLANT LIST
w.r.r. 0.w•�if�:N
M1.
SENIORS
CONGREGATE
HOUSING
EDINA. MINNESOTA
FOR GRANDVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
PRELIMINARY
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
f
WEPT 32ND STREET
f.'
- - --� - _
: 1
J �
U
0O
L!
r
aL® rooNWor�•r aims
yaST 67RO STREET
No.rN
PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN
.Cil.: 1 I�CN- ii Ii.1
-- Mw•�9.N
M NJJ .rpm w .
p•w
p.hdv-
Wr.—I.Ina.
SENIORS
CONGREGATE
HOUSING
WINA• MINNESOTA
FOR GRANDVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
GRADING PLAP
3
PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN
•c�u: �cxw a� ner
.exr.
r rr�
. R.hd-
.R..rfW....1. Ine.
SENIORS
CONGREGATE
HOUSING
EDINA. MINNESOTA
FOR GRANDVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
UTILITY PLAN
6rax "" -)b *tYN1 (40WICAO -)
4pt1• Mtb 17/tl. b�Crw)O IA r1
hM. LL�M•<.MO MaI Iar Ufa6 [a0G YQ
HGNI,:0 4"Fe&.Ta rt7lK+Nb - E(lw, Mrot.
u IR TIN
I`
.ta Par rt ..
n
40
4s
tr
tAxw-T
tN mlal"
I Pew -,
6
6
15
A
1{
• 11
Ito., •Lr.
♦
/
Y
O
v
1 10
toT✓"• N
TAT—
lat.iis.►r•
4
1
1
♦ M
�tos.
i
t
a
s
e
o s
1trly"
19
91
40.
%
78
151
60(XA C.k • W.W105r
60614 AMk K16AP
CSt)
c4oim4 G r%""4v FXMW. - WrA." moo.
uP,r 7YN 1«11x. n.•,
ri" o
4.'ioo
Tom. rlwF 1 a f-boo• Ihybf
IOOh b
TW,"
io.•Ws
166v. G6W ♦
m.
1Wr 4
eeoo• s
rIrTN
a.n+
a-'Tw
L..♦ly
to
titg2-
toT✓"• N
TAT—
lat.iis.►r•
N'L'Iti 4R
rVAT14
ft a
Wy'�in�sOrr W ricy�
Ar , ec 9 c•.
wm To
SENIORS
'ONGREGATE
iOUSING
:DINA• MINNESOTA
'OR GRANDVIEW
)EVELOPMENT
:OMPANY
MILDING
=LOOK PLANS
5
O
F
r�TO
Gfvfi MW�P'la»' #0,900 fe' a .1t,l14be MWWl % taYMOAjV WLMA 6 . SPHA, MOM
WIT 7Ye0 m N► " r e FL.a r—, no-4 1, V.04 dk r- so. II.41•as
loos I0 /0
a xr- -1 sT
e riaa a r
"Ll Ot IIb
y secs tu, uIe eF a G.ors Ca rtey ,I lwy q -cone . rn«.
.6.,,6 nay FLAN, qmF 5 r2 r.3o• n• }I es
I era•w.
.ew. t
!1 -1 MY:
ylbbs e.eea 9;166 sc �i,lors cor'Irfeyen /�wslr� - earls.. rorlrl.
F ccf E e• �v 11.0 -ee Ibs7N
IM4 r
ilsA•Rrl .
IOaw
W 1
ft 0
r • M,rrrw •�.,�� r_
SENIORS
CONGREGATE
HOUSING
1 DIN", NINNf,90TA
ron aIANUVIEw
DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
BUILDING
FLOOR PLANS
6
NORTH ELEVATION
vie _p_o.
P Leo vc.
wu.
TYPICAL ELEVATION
M..
M
f
-
-
4J 11!
m �'` i _ 9 •� g �kI 11 `}} Ill ° 1 - ejY �{_j� ���_ _ 9 r, SENIORS
=UJ U1 fill u i Iiir - F1 ut CONGREGATE
HOUSING
EDfiA M94ESOTA
FOR GRANDVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
EAST ELEVATION COMPANY
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
• 7
Winsor/Faricy Architects, Inc. Seniors Congregate Housing
Edina, Minnesota
For Grandview Development Company
PROJECT DATA W/F Project No. 8310 -850 -1
21 November 1985
Specific Data:
Site Area:
152,427 Sq.Ft. (3.5 A)
Zone:
PSR4 Senior Citizen
No. of Units:
152
Lot Area Required:
152,000 Sq.Ft.
Building Area:
159,422 Sq.Ft.
F.A.R. Required:
1.2 max.
F.A.R. Provided:
1.05
Lot Coverage Required:
35% max.
Lot Coverage Provided:
20.3%
Parking:
Open Enclosed
Total
Required:
76 38
114
Provided:
51 94
145
Units:
1 BDR
2 BDR
Floor 1 BDR + Den
2 BDR (End)
3 BDR
Total
1 8 4
3 2
2
19
2 15 6
7 2
2
32
3 15 6
7 2
2
32
4 15 6
7 2
2
32
5 15 6
7 0
0
28
6 3 2
4 0
0
9
Total: 71 30
35 8
8
152
43
Net Areas: (Does Not Include Balconies)
1 BDR: 654 S.F. x 71 =
46,434 S.F.
1 BDR + Den: 804 S.F. x 30 =
24,120 S.F.
2 BDR: 900 S.F. x 43 =
38,700 S.F.
3 BDR: 1,050 S.F. x 8 =
8,400 S.F.
Total:
117,654 S.F.
Gross Areas:
1 FL: 30,926
2 FL: 30,705
3 FL: 30,705
4 FL: 30,705
5 FL: 26,613
6 FL: 9,768
Total: 159,422 S.F. (Net to Gross Ratio: 7417o)
+ Garage: 38,576
Total: 197,998 S.F.
ME M O R A N D U M
TO: City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: BILTMORE MOTEL REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
DATE: December 13, 1985
The Council and HRA will consider final rezoning and redevelopment
agreement approval for the subject project. The following is a
summary of the redevelopment agreement.
Redeveloper
The redeveloper is Grandview Development Company which is a partnership
comprising Frank Dunbar, Dale Barlage and Robert A. Johnson. Mr. Dunbar
is the managing partner.
Payments to Edina
The redeveloper will pay $50,000 to the HRA in three annual installments,
the first of which is payable upon the disbursement of the proceeds of
the Housing Revenue Bonds. The redeveloper will also pay the HRA's
attorney's fees, staff time and consultant's fees associated with
negotiating and drafting the redevelopment agreement. The City's cost
of issuing the Housing Revenue Bonds will be covered by the bond issue.
Construction of Project
The redeveloper will start the project within 30 days of the disbursement
of bond proceeds but not later than May 4, 1986.
Construction of Public Improvements
The public improvements, in this case, include the proposed traffic
signal at Link Road and Vernon Avenue, and sidewalks and other improve-
ments in the Grandview Area. The redevelopment agreement states that
the City and HRA will pursue these improvements in good faith, but will
not be liable if such improvements are not undertaken. If we undertake
these improvements, the HRA will pay for such improvements directly or
pay the special assessments which otherwise would be levied against
this property.
Assessment Agreement
The redeveloper agrees that it will not contest an assessor's estimated
market value for the completed project which is at or below a certain
minimum value. That minimum value results in an annual tax increment
e
December`"13', 1985
City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Page Two
of $150,000. It is also agreed, however, that if the HRA /City does
not authorize construction of the traffic signal at Link and Vernon
by January 1, 1987, and if it isn't installed by January 1, 1988, then
this assessment agreement becomes null and void.
Transfer of the Project
The redeveloper agrees that it cannot transfer ownership of the project
without HRA consent prior to.its completion.
Payments by HRA
Other than our agreement to pay any special assessments levied against
this property for Grandview Area improvements, no other payments or
"write downs" by the HRA are required.
Housing Revenue Bonds
This agreement is conditioned upon issuance of Housing Revenue Bonds
by the City for the project.
GH /sw
I
• '1111
GLENN G. NYBECK
GORDON V.JOHNSON
JOHN K. BOUOUET
JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
MARK G.OHNSTAD
DONALD D. SMITH
JACK W.CARLSON
DENNIS M. PATRICK
MARSH J. HALBERG
MARK E. LASEE
JOHN R. PRAETORIUS
THOMSEN, NYBECK,JOHNSON, BOUQUET & VAN VALKENBURG, P.A.
LAW OFFICES
SUITE 102 -7250 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS (EDINAI,MINNESOTA 55435
16121 635 -7000
OF COUNSEL
HELGE THOMSEN
RICHARD D. WILSON, P. A.
ROBERT E. 2ECK
December 12, 1985
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
Members of City Council
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: Grandview Development
(Old Biltmore Site)
Dear Mayor Courtney and Members of the Council:
At the December 16, 1985 meeting of the HRA and the
Edina City Council, the final hearing on the above will be
heard.
You will be asked to do the following:
1. Approve the final zoning.
2. Approve the Redevelopment Agreement.
3. Authorize the sale of the bonds.
The final plans have been approved by the Planning
Commission.
The survey being run by Health Central is well under
way and we are working on our final agreements with them for
management of the project.
We are anxious to close this on December 17th. It is
essential that it be done promptly so that the interest rate
may be protected and the tax exemot status be protected before
any changes by the U. S. Congress.
With that schedule we hope in January or early February
to have all of the financing complete and be in a position to start
Mayor C. Wayne Courtney -2- December 12, 1985
construction in February or early March. That is, of course, subject
to final permits from the building officials, and items of that nature
and the final details on financing.
At that point the property will be demolished and fenced
and the new construction started. During the winter season the
hazard that existed on the property is no longer current.
You should be aware of the fact that no monies are being
paid to the developer by the City.
The developer will be paying the costs of the City and HRA
in the minimum sum of $7,500 and that will go up depending on the
actual costs of attorneys fees, outside consultants and such employed
by either the City or the HRA.
In addition to the above the developer will be paying to the
City for a city dedication, the sum of $50,000.
We will be signing an Assessment Agreement which guarantees
the payment of all tax increment funds to pay back the increment
which is to be used for the public improvements. At this time that
would be primarily some sidewalk, and a signal on Vernon Avenue. That
is being held until further plans are resolved regarding the property
across the street and the development of the entire area essentially
along the line of the BRW report.
Certainly if there are any questions I would appreciate
hearing from any of you and would be willing to talk with any of
you either in a group or individually, at or prior to the December
16th meeting.
I might say also that with our timing I would appreciate it
if the documents could be signed either after the Council meeting on
December 16th, or at least the first thing in the morning on December
17th. We will be having a pre - closing on all of the bond documents in
the afternoon of December 16th. That, of course, is all conditioned
on the ultimate approval by the Council and HRA.
Yo 1
JVV:jd ames an Valkenb
cc: All Council members
Gordon Hughes
Craig Larson
Kenneth Rosland
•IN,11 r I•l ; m ►,I /A\
r0
complies with
the structure.
Ordinance of
Frank Dunb
ch
Rezoning
onded the
II. NEW BUSINESS:
/ 5 -85 -12 Richard Steiner and Robert Gislason
Preliminary Plat Approval, Lots 41,
\V 1 o and 42, Block 2, South Harriet Park
2nd Addition
I �✓
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property
consists of two, individually developed single dwelling
lots. Both lots are relatively narrow and exceptionally
deep, each measuring approximately 60 feet by 400 feet.
Total area in the two lots is 44,854 square feet.
Mr. Larsen stated the individual owners have agreed to
a joint venture to propose a four lot subdivision which
would create two, new buildable lots. Lot 1 measures 78
feet in width, 119 feet in depth and contains 9,282 square
feet. Lot 2 would be 80 feet wide, 119 feet deep, and would
contain 10,472 square feet. Lots 3 and 4, for the existing
dwellings, would contain 13,400 and 11,700 square feet
respectively.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the zoning Ordinance requires a
minimum lot depth of 120 feet. Since Lots 1 and 2 would
provide only 119 feet, a lot depth variance would be
required. The new lots would meet all other Zoning
Ordinance requirements for single dwelling unit lots.
Mr. Larsen added that within the South Harriet Park
Subdivision a lot width of approximately 60 feet seems
typical. Lot depths within the two block area east of the
creek between 52nd and 54th Street vary from 220 to over 400
feet. Due to the path of the creek and the need to align
with roads to the north, the lots in this area are unusually
deep.
Mr. Larsen concluded there is adequate property
available on this combined site to provide two new lots
which would be very
Street. Lots widths
north of 52nd Street
lots are between 105
recommended approval
conditions:
similar to the lots north of 52nd
on Juanita, Indianola, and Halifax,
are generally 75 or 80 feet, and most
and 110 feet in depth. Staff
with the following changes and
1. Increase the frontage on each lot to 85 feet
to compensate for the lack of lot depth. The
existing houses would still maintain 65 -70
foot rear yards.
2. In order to have adequate spacing between the
new home on lot 1 and the existing home at
5209 (immediately south) the normal rear
yard set back of 25 feet should be increased
to 40 feet. This condition could be imposed when
lot depth variances are requested.
3. Developer's agreement to cover the extension of the
water main in 52nd Street to serve the new lots.
4. Subdivision dedication.
Mr. Palmer asked Mr. Larsen if the proponents had an
objection to the increase of the rear yard setback from 25
feet to 40 feet. Mr. Larsen stated he has submitted a staff
report to Mr. Frank Cardarelle, Developer but at this time
had received no reply.
Mr. Mansell Mitchell resident of 5137 Juanita stated he
was not opposed to the development of the property in
question but would like the Commission to take into
consideration the uniqueness of the neighborhood and the
architectural design of its' homes. Mr. Mitchell further
added he realizes the Commission and Council cannot place
architectural restrictions on Developers with regard to
structural design of dwellings but expressed his concern
that the new dwellings maintain compatibility with the
character of the neighborhood.
Mrs. Helen McClelland moved for approval of the
preliminary plat subject to staff conditions and the
condition that the increase of the rear yard setback from 25
feet to 40 feet be recorded with the plat. Mr. John Palmer
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 4, 1985
5 -85 -12 Richard Steiner and Robert Gislason
Preliminary Plat Approval, Lots 41,
and 42, Block 2, South Harriet Park
2nd Addition
Refer to: Attached preliminary Plat and map of
neighborhood
Present Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District.
Generally located: East of Minnehaha Boulevard and south
of west 52nd Street
The subject property consists of two, individually
developed single dwelling lots. Both lots are relatively
narrow and exceptionally deep, each measuring approximately
60 feet by 400 feet. Total area in the two lots is 44,854
square feet.
The individual owners have agreed to a joint venture to
propose a four lot subdivision which would create two, new
buildable lots. Lot 1 measures 78 feet in width, 119 feet
in depth and contains 9,282 square feet. Lot 2 would be 80
feet wide, 119 feet deep, and would contain 10,472 square
feet. Lots 3 and 4, for the existing dwellings, would
contain 13,400 and 11,700 square feet respectively.
The zoning Ordinanbe requires a minimum lot depth of
120 feet. Since Lots 1 and 2 would provide only 119 feet, a
lot depth variance would be required. The new lots would
meet all other Zoning Ordinance requirements for single
dwelling unit lots.
Within the South Harriet Park Subdivision a lot width
of approximately 60 feet seems typical. Lot depths within
the two block area east of the creek between 52nd and 54th
Street vary from 220 to over 400 feet. Due to the path of
the creek and the need to align with roads to the north, the
lots in this area are unusually deep.
Recommendation
There is adequate property available on this combined
site to provide two new lots which would be very similar to
the lots north of 52nd Street. Lots widths on Juanita,
Indianola, and Halifax, north of 52nd Street are generally
75 or 80 feet, and most lots are between 105 and 110 feet in
depth. Staff recommends approval with the following changes
and conditions:
1. Increase the frontage on each lot to 85 feet
to compensate for the lack of lot depth. The
existing houses would still maintain 65 -70
foot rear yards.
2. In order to have adequate spacing between the
new home on lot 1 and the existing home at
5209 (immediately south) the normal rear
yard set back of 25 feet should be increased
to 40 feet. This condition could be imposed when
lot depth variances are requested.
3. Developer's agreement to cover the extension of the
water main in 52nd Street to serve the new lots.
4. Subdivision dedication.
• CAi2DARELLE & ASSOCIATES, I11C. Land Surveyors
8110 Eden Road Phone (612) 941 -3031 Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Certif 'rate ®f curb ep
Survey For Richard Steiner Book Page File C_151 -85
5201 Minnehaha Boulevard
Edinaq MN 55424
ac
PROPOSED LOT DIVISION LOTS 41 AND 421 BLOCK 2, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION
4 ,
Q
WEST 52ND STREET
#5201
1
#5205
. -2 3.2 - -
G.�r 3
/3466
84
c
r p
a
f� �l
w
e
LOT I LOT 2
1,01-7Z
78 eve
1#5209
Scale: 111=501
1 heroiy sarNfy NMI thb is o true eod oorred rop 1 11 of o Awroy of NM 168 1 rioo d Lots 41 and 42. Block 2. South
_Harriet Park 2nd Addi ti nn 4.ogl. Comfy, Mhoesa/o and of NM los+llo. of oU_
iriliiop MMnoe, and all
vWblo a a -dmeam If any, from or oo said land. Swvw d by o» Ihl- 1 +h A— NA be , if .8r;
/
CAROARM I E & ASSOCIATEs, INC:
+' KELLOGG AVENUE
' co � rolls I
w • p ' �` '. iF - � o • .a ': o � �,, (" w G, u• P A 'Y' 4a ,� IR &,7' n s M
rtt CA
Co 'Stu
CL
(° OAKLAWN AVENUE
I
I i
171 111.1
PARK
,
r
Y, r
1 o
I M
s
.... lM_
f N W10,
••i•..°i So lo, ',a / Ulal -4 L w h ,!
DDALE' G1 ° / s• -. ""JSECTION-
„ \. .
-4w 1
47
..ti'. 51.4, �,5.� - N / ,1 /'a • '1
.,.,, s
n7.12 ...
i s ti 6.4h .
W/.
„a ry .>
51�
:5
aft
.. a , ee c.s
,
� f.lf rT
/N Il � 1• a
N
x ! S•.,l � s s r•', S; i °'- N o e v 'N °. o 'qf. -r4Q •- -- . -__.._ is
6 n 3.= . _ uL!i s t L,
711.!
(A �� ,
-_
1
„�,,�; IISt •ryV
.1 � =� � ��'Ill �,�o °.
�N •gyp Vu•N
::w � -G F V+II�T' V
•01• °jI � � IN N I� N � N
ARD_
/1 ,•
•
uGJ u, St' a\
7M•''' S GO
✓� °- FHq REEK y►a O \� �� - \"I_
1; I • uN ° w ,�\ I' A F w >C Jv - � n .. jy u W •. a ., j v. C a+''^ ... '9 N • _ M
-,Oa I. 4l °�' - ` , .� - n),.\F ..Ile . 1S � '. \a ,7.ae .N� •uoN. , ° ce
L O T A I a y J In A w .•u°•Sy �Y ,•a u�_ i 'P �` �Y� ^r - w _Y �t - - ' ;' \1
� l.t� J ANITA s vl(i,1;.7 ° ��
`�p► I AVE.
' II J f ,°
i �' •!. , 1. I I .p - •I � 1 w ..� G do 'i � as •i v
I Nx Ir , �1 v(g` ° f s__ „ s ,. ” yes.cl° I' •• _ - -' m
N Q' r u Iv I W ly I: `
N I: °
lI N
I = .� N N " N I. g G �; g N o v °• � G, fn , �. ' w a
r ° � T ' cJ . 0. ; , 1 . 11 I w -.1 ° .• H.. r, � , I � ” 1 I n W hm ii v \ G1. I • I ° h s• I,°
NOLA0 _
AVE.x
t� r
s I DIANOLA 0 AVE.
I_
G' _ _ dj ° 01 tt IC
N I Ifa+ IN I Y1 O. • W N - - ° V G,J I!! ',,' -
IIyj y /yVpC7 �4v
/011 TV 0 I .
IL Iff,
anm �u
AVENUE
,n ' h1HA 1. e. 1, b
10 0
1 it t f�
M Ip N I �IN I`? yiaM V I 01 J I aP a 'C•`• • O� • 4 17
\
A �- •� \ l7 ji N•.• I
° N N A N ' Np N °. I W N w. p lP I ` •F n ... :sCB 208 v .•1117 D
0. tse GORGAS AV p ' • ;° . N17.4r -w •,� {s a ao
- GdiLGe.J. Go_� G Gail !! 9asl4eDL :_{ - X' tr o.,
I
I i , I I � ti �✓
v D A l .I NO.
^ fy _' 1 � W C q ~ N A 61 �, to I• .,a ,�• ' .1
ID m
U
5
FQAAIPF---- -- - ---
- -AWFMI IF- — —
- -Hyvr .. Nn -191
x
tn
H
N
z
O�
1 +
SD
�A m
C+
h 7'+
IQ (A
ct! r•
N
154 m
►'•• (A
o
obi
it O
o
to
a a
O O
a♦
a
r•
rA
H.
O
•
z
O
Q'
SD
°1
r
f+
Fr
�D
co
Vt
I
-4w 1
14 All
anm �u
AVENUE
,n ' h1HA 1. e. 1, b
10 0
1 it t f�
M Ip N I �IN I`? yiaM V I 01 J I aP a 'C•`• • O� • 4 17
\
A �- •� \ l7 ji N•.• I
° N N A N ' Np N °. I W N w. p lP I ` •F n ... :sCB 208 v .•1117 D
0. tse GORGAS AV p ' • ;° . N17.4r -w •,� {s a ao
- GdiLGe.J. Go_� G Gail !! 9asl4eDL :_{ - X' tr o.,
I
I i , I I � ti �✓
v D A l .I NO.
^ fy _' 1 � W C q ~ N A 61 �, to I• .,a ,�• ' .1
ID m
U
5
FQAAIPF---- -- - ---
- -AWFMI IF- — —
- -Hyvr .. Nn -191
x
tn
H
N
z
O�
1 +
SD
�A m
C+
h 7'+
IQ (A
ct! r•
N
154 m
►'•• (A
o
obi
it O
o
to
a a
O O
a♦
a
r•
rA
H.
O
•
z
O
Q'
SD
°1
r
f+
Fr
�D
co
Vt
I
t
L Im") 3
a
WA
2 OOVRE D OOVRE ORIVE f
> _
Z
n BISCAYNE BLVO o BISCAYNE BLVO
C -A s
ones
' �� O�`rl Y••fi�Iiri ■ LONDONDERRY Ditto E tO.G
- " O♦'. •riii ■ ■ ■iii _•
♦ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ • • • C
_ - ■ • • • • • • • ■ • • ■ • • u
- • • ■ ■ • i. ■ • ■ • ■ • ■ ■ • -
■ • ■ • ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • r �• .. 2 J
LANGFORO
- - �— - O,QIVE APE
LANG FORD CT, FOUNTAINWOOD 0 A7
y
APTS b. t
E D I NA. WEST APTS
l P V J 4 �PNON ,
/.•__.0 l.f.,.i� ice.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT
NUMBER P -85 -7 P L A 14
L 0 C A T 10 N 5901 County Road X618
REQUEST Building Expansion
EDINA PLANNHNIG DEPAR i MEN7
which would be ver
S
_ .___...�,.,
---eet are generally 75 or 80 feet,
lots are between 105 and 110 feet in depth. Staff
recommended approval with the following changes an
conditions:
1. Increase the frontage on each lot to feet
to compensate for the lack of lot d h. The
existing houses would still mainta' 65 -70
foot rear yards.
F"
most
2. In order to have adequate Ithermal between the
new home on lot 1 and the home at
5209 (immediately south) rear
yard set back of 25 feet increased
to 40 feet. This conditibe imposed when
lot depth variances are r
3. Developer's agreement
water main in 52nd Str
4. Subdivision dedicati
over the extension of the
to serve the new lots.
Mr. Palmer asked Mr. L en if the proponents had an
objection to the increase the rear yard setback from 25
feet to 40 feet. Mr. Larjoh stated he has submitted a staff
report to Mr. Frank CardAWlle, Developer but at this time
had received no reply. Aff
Mr. Mansell Mi ell resident of 5137 Juanita stated he
was not opposed to a development of the property in
question but woul ike the Commission to take into
consideration th niqueness of the neighborhood and the
architectural d gn of its' homes. Mr. Mitchell further
added he reali the Commission and Council cannot place
architectural strictions on Developers with regard to
structural d gn of dwellings but expressed his concern
that the ne wellings maintain compatibility with the
character the neighborhood.
Mr elen McClelland moved for approval of the
prelim' ry plat subject to staff conditions and the
condi n that the
feet
OPP
se on. All were in favor. The motion
ca e .
P -85 -7 Honeywell, Incorporated 5901 County Road #18
1
0
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property
measures 21.74 acres in.:size and is developed with structure
containing a gross area of 96,768 square feet. The property
is bounded on the West by County Road 18, on the south by
Manor Homes, and the east by Nine Mile Creek. Directly
north of the site are the Londonderry Townhomes, and to the
northeast are single family homes.
Although Honeywell owns several parcels
adjacent to the subject property, only Tract
Land Survey 1145 is used to determine Zoning
the subject proposal. No changes or improves
proposed on tracts B,D and E of R.L.S. 1145,
R.L.S. 1378.
near or
A of Registered
Compliance for
rents are
or Tract B of
Mr. Larsen stated Honeywell has submitted plans for a
3 -story building containing a gross floor area of 169,690
square feet. As required by the Zoning Ordinance a site
plan, grading and utility plan, landscaping plan, and
elevations have been provided for Commission review.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed
immediately north of, and connected to t
building. The building will be cut into
will allow the roof elevation of the new
same as the existing building. Exterior
brick to match the existing brick.
building would be
he existing
the hillside which
building to be the
materials will be
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proposed addition
either meets or exceeds all standards and conditions
established in the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Larsen added the proponents have submitted plans to
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for the required
grading permit. The plan does indicate filling in a portion
of the flood plain for'the site. According to Barr
Engineering, consultants to the Watershed, the proposed
encroachment is within the allowed 20 percent encroachment,
and that Watershed staff will 'recommend that the permit be
granted.
Mr. Larsen reported that Honeywell has also submitted
a traffic study. The report shows that currently, the only
access to the site is on Lincoln Drive midway along the
Westerly properly line. Although Londonderry Drive east of
Lincoln Drive is a public street, it currently serves only
the residents of Londonderry Townhomes. The use of
Londonderry Drive by Honeywell will increase the average
daily traffic, on the street from 420 trips to approximately
1,240 trips.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff believes that Honeywell has
prepared an excellent plan for expansion on this site. The
building addition is weal located, and the design and
materials are excellent. The site is currently well
buffered from residential uses to the north and east by the
creek and existing vegetation. None of this area will be
disturbed. New landscaping is proposed at approximately
double Ordinance requirements. New landscaping along the
southerly property line will provide a visual buffer for the
residents of Manor Homes.
Mr. Larsen stated that several traffic related issues
should be addressed:
1. County Road 18 - Londonderry Interchange. The
Interchange currently becomes quite congested during peak
hours. The installation of signals at the ramps in 1986
should help relieve this congestion.
2. Honeywell site access. Staff feels that the site
should have two access points. The use of Londonderry Drive
appears to be the most appropriate location.
3. Londonderry Drive Design. The plans submitted
illustrate Londonderry as a entry only to the Honeywell
site. Staff would prefer to see a full cul de sac at the
end of Londonderry. This would allow snow plows and other
traffic to turn around without using townhouse property.
Mr. David Opheim, Honeywell Defense Systems, Mr. Jim
Lindberg, Architect and Mr. Kick Coppy were present
representing Honeywell, Inc.
Mr. Opheim explained to the Commission that Honeywell
has occupied the present building since 1979 and the
expansion plans are for office and research space. The
reason for the expansion is two -fold:
1. To consolidate the 2,000 Honeywell employees
which are presently spread over the southwest
suburbs, the majority at Opus.(the proposed
expansion would increase the occupancy of the site
from 300 to 750. 10% to 15% would be new hires).
2. Expansion of Business.
Mr. Opheim added that Honeywell has employed the
architectural firm of Lindberg and Pierce to develop a
building concept that would 1) have no variances. 2)
Comply with all EPA standards. 3) stress protection of the
wetlands and natural vegetation. 4) maintain or exceed
present landscaping 5) blend with the terrain.(the
result being the proposed structure's height matching the
present structure. 6) address the problem of traffic.
r�
E � '
Mr. Opheim stated that Honeywell requested that
Lindberg /Pierce employ a` traffic engineering firm (Westwood)
to study the problem of traffic, take measurements and
propose recommendations or means to minimize the traffic
impaction for Edina residents. Mr. Opheim pointed out in a
traffic flow study that the center of gravity for Honeywell
employees is the highway intersection of Highway 55 and
Highway 18, concluding the majority of employees will use
Highway 18 to commute to /from work and not travel through
the City of Edina. Mr. Opheim noted that Honeywell works a
flex hour system, which should disburse the traffic flow
over a few hours, minimizing the traffic impact during peak
hours. Mr. Opheim told the Commission that Honeywell mailed
notices to affected neighbors inviting them to a meeting on
the proposed expansion. Twelve neighbors attended. The
primary concern of the neighbors in attendance was the
proposed drive access from Honeywell to Londonderry Road to
the north. Presently a access does not exist at this
location. Mr Opheim added that members of Honeywell,
traffic engineers and the architects discussed other
alternatives and concluded, as did staff, that the northerly
access was the best.
Mr. Lindberg elaborated on building design, pointing
out the care that was taken in blending the new structure
with the present structure, noting landscaping is double the
Ordinance requirement. Mr. Lindberg added that a 6% to 80
encroachment of the marsh area will take place as a result
of the expansion. This encroachment into the flood plain is
allowed, a 20% encroachment guideline is permitted. The
expansion has been reviewed by the Watershed District, and
no objections were made to the 6% to 8% encroachment.
Mr. Lindberg said the storm sewer system would be improved,
filtering out more sand and forming a retention pond which
would improve the quality of run -off water. Mr. Lindberg
pointed out the parking and traffic concern, stating at
present 550 cars come in and go out of the site daily. One
of the problems found on the site by Westwood is left -hand
turns; and as a result the suggestion was made to find
another point of egress and ingress. It appears that for
purposes of emergency exiting and the elimination of left
hand turns adding a driveway to the north accessing
Londonderry is the best solution. The driveway would be
adequately screened.
Mr. John Loper, Mr. Peter Shank,and residents of
Londonderry Townhomes were present.
Mr. Loper submitted to the Commission a written
statement expressing the feelings of the residents of
Londonderry Townhomes and a signed petition opposing the
construction of a drive access to Londonderry Road by
Honeywell, Inc. ) note: Staff refers to the Road in
question as Londonderry Road, Residents of Londonderry
Townhome at times refer to the road as Duncan Lane.)
Mr. Loper began by reading the letter from the
residents of Londonderry Townhomes to the Planning
Commission.
"The homeowners in the Londonderry Townhouse complex
are deeply concerned about the Honeywell plan to put a road
from Duncan Lane into their property which lies to the
south. Duncan Lane is a pretty little incline down to Nine
Mile Creek and was not intended to become a main
thourogfare. It is about 180 feet long and has a 70 foot
wide city right -of -way that the Townhouse Association has
sodded, landscaped, sprinkled and maintained for about 15
years. It is the only entrance and exit road for the
Londonderry residents.
We object to the proposed road for the following
reasons:
Honeywell owns about 1500 feet of land immediately
adjacent to Lincoln Drive, property that could easily
accommodate another entrance or exit for their parking lots.
The location of the parking areas on the plat plan
shows that a road off of Duncan Lane would require traffic
to drive behind and around their building into the three
major parking areas.
The large increase in traffic on Duncan Lane will
greatly restrict movement in and out of Londonderry, and it
will adversely affect our quality of life as well as our
property values.
We strongly urge the Planning Commission to ask
Honeywell to delete the - Duncan Lane driveway from their
plan."
Mr. Loper explained that on or about the 1st of
November residents of Londonderry Townhomes received a
invitation from Honeywell, Inc. to attend a meeting
regarding the proposed expansion. It was discovered at that
meeting where the proposed road access was to be
constructed. Mr. Loper stated that the residents of
Londonderry Townhomes have no objection to the proposed
expansion and find it very well done. Their objection is to
the proposed access onto Duncan Lane. Mr. Loffer stated the
Developer deeded Duncan Lane to the City in exchange for
pavement of the road down to the bridge over Nine Mile
Creek; the bridge is owned by the Londonderry Townhome
Association. Mr. Loper further explained that the area
around the creek has been maintained by the Association.
Sprinklers have been added, and the area has been
landscaped. Large stones have been put along the edge of
the road to prevent damage to the terrain from vehicles who
turn around in the area. Mr. Loper said residents of
Londonderry feel that Lincoln Drive has adequate space for
installation of left turn lanes, and another access to
handle Honeywell traffic.
Mr. Peter Shank addressed the Commission stating the
Associations concern regarding the road access is valid.
Mr. Shank, using graphics, pointed out alternative uses of
Lincoln Drive , a possibility would be adding an additional
drive entrance /exit which in his opinion would help the
elimination of left -hand turns. Mr. Shank feels that the
proposed road access by Honeywell is at the expense of the
residents of Londonderry Townhomes. Duncan Lane is a
beautiful, charming road and the additional signage needed
for the proposed access would have a negative effect on the
Londonderry Townhomes. Mr. Shank said the road would
essentially become a commercial entrance to a commercial
facility. Mr. Shank asked the Commission to seriously
consider alternative road access.
Mr. Loper pointed out to the Commission that Duncan
Lane is a residential street that abutts commercial
property. Duncan Lane is the only access to Lincoln Drive,
by residents of Londonderry. Mr. Loper questioned if
mixing a residential street with a commercial driveway
would be establishing a precedent. Mr. Loper also expressed
concern that if the proposed road access is approved the
street will then be used as a delivery and construction road
during the course of expansion construction. Mr. Lopfer
commented on the steep slope of Duncan Lane.
Mr. Koppy, representing Honeywell, said the proposed
access will result in the reduction of left -hand turns which
will benefit not only Honeywell, but the residents of
Londonderry Townhomes.' Mr. Koppy stated the reason for
considering the proposed road access resulted from the
traffic study. Mechanical counters were placed at the
Londonderry and Lincoln corner, the entrance of Honeywell
and below. Manual counters were also placed at the corner
of the Honeywell entrance. Even though stacking and the
steep slope of Londonderry Road were acknowledged issues,
the access to Londonderry road was found to be the best
solution. A plus factor of the proposed access is that the
City will take the road from the blue to the red which will
result in quicker snow removal. Mr. Koppy using a chart
highlighted the traffic study numbers, indicating proposed
traffic lights and 4 -way stop.
Mrs. Helen McClelland expressed her view on the
proposed Development Plan. Mrs. McClelland stated she was
very pleased with the expansion, and found no fault with the
design and landscaping. Mrs. McClelland did express extreme
displeasure with the proposed drive access from Honeywell to
Londonderry Road. Mrs.. McClelland felt little consideration
was given to the residents of Parkwood Knolls in the
planning of this road access, which would affect them as
well as the residents of Londonderry Townhomes. Mrs.
McClelland pointed out that Lincoln Drive was designed to
handle a large volume of traffic, in her opinion Londonderry
Road /Duncan Lane is a small road with a bad grade, minimal
stacking capabilities and unable to handle a large increase
in traffic volume. Mrs. McClelland further added she felt
a traffic - signal should be placed on Lincoln Drive in
addition to the proposed lights on the ramp. Mr. John
Skagerberg agreed with her. Mr Larsen responded that the
City Council approved signals for the ramps.
Mr. Fran Hoffman, City Engineer, clarified points regarding
the traffic issue.
1). Three traffic - signals will be installed, two
at the ramps and one at Smentana Drive.
The placing of these signals are a result
of very heavy traffic flow volumes. Lincoln
Drive does not meet the traffic flow requirements
that warrant a traffic signal.
2) If a 4 -way stop is placed, all traffic will have
access, not only the ones on Lincoln Drive.
3) If Honeywell uses only Lincoln Drive accesss, it
will result in increased volumes of left turns at
the Lincoln and Londonderry Intersection,
which will result in a conflict with the
residents of Parkwood Knolls and Londonderry
Townhomes.
4) It is felt that a balanced blend of commercial
and residential - can be maintained. Commercial
use is high in the morning as residential use
leaves, the reverse happening in the evening.
Mr. Hoffman stated he understood the feelings of the
residents, but the Edina side of the freeway does not
generate the volume of traffic that would warrant a traffic
signal at the Lincoln Drive - Londonderry intersection.
Mr. Gordon Johnson asked Mr. Hoffman what will happen
if cars exiting Honeywell stack on Londonderry and cut off
the residents trying to leave Londonderry Townhomes. Mr.
Hoffman explained that Honeywell does not have free access
to the public roadway. A stop sign will be put at the exit
of Honeywell to the public road.
Mr. Del Johnson asked Mr. Hoffman if in staffs opinion
the proposed road access is the best possible solution. Mr.
Hoffman said to supply'a balance that does not favor one leg
of the intersection over the other this solution is the
best solution. Mr. Hoffman said staff agree this access is
a detriment to the residents of Londonderry Townhomes but in
community interest staff feel this is the best solution.
Mrs. McClelland stated she understands the staff
concept, but feels Lincoln Drive should be the access. Mr.
John Bailey expressed his concern and agreement with Mrs.
McClelland.
Mr. John Palmer motioned for approval of the Final
Development subject to staff conditions. Mr. John
Skagerberg seconded the motion. Rollcall:
Ayes: John Palmer, John Skagerberg, William Lewis, Del
Johnson, Virginia Shaw
Nays: Jane Paulus, Gordon Johnson, Phil Sked, Helen
Mcclelland, John Bailey.
The motion failed.
Mr. Griswald of Londonderry Townhomes voiced his
concern that Duncan Lane is the only access Londonderry
Townhomes residents have to Lincoln Drive. If Londonderry
Road traffic increases the chances of residents to access
Lincoln Drive worsens.
Mrs. McClelland moved that the building expansion plans
of Honeywell be approved but the Commission requests that
the traffic circulation be re- worked and brought back to the
Commission for review. The motion died for lack of second.
A discussion ensued between Commission members, staff
and Honeywell members on how to word the motion.
Mr. John Palmer moved that the Commission approve the
plan with the exception of the traffic conditions. Helen
McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The
motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 4, 1985
P -85 -7 Honeywell, Incorporated 5901 County Road #18
Request: Building Expansion
Existing Zoning: Planned Industrial District (PID)
Refer to: Attached plans and information
The subject property measures 21.74 acres in size and
is developed with structure containing a gross area of
96,768 square feet. The property is bounded on the West by
County Road 18, on the south by Manor-Homes, and the east by
Nine Mile Creek. Directly north of the site are the
Londonderry Townhomes, and to the northeast are single
family homes.
Although Honeywell owns several parcels near or
adjacent to the subject property, only Tract A of Registered
Land Survey 1145 is used to determine Zoning Compliance for
the subject proposal. No changes or improvements are
proposed on tracts B,D and E of R.L.S. 1145, or Tract B of
R.L.S. 1378.
Honeywell has submitted plans for a 3 -story building
containing a gross floor area of 169,690 square feet. As
required by the Zoning Ordinance a site plan, grading and
utility plan, landscaping plan, and elevations have been
provided for Commission review.
The proposed building would be immediately north of,
and connected to the existing building. The building will
be cut into the hillside which will allow the roof elevation
of the new building to be the same as the existing building.
Exterior materials will be brick to match the existing
brick.
The proposed addition either meets or exceeds all
standards and conditions established in the Zoning
Ordinance.
The proponents have submitted plans to the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District for the required grading permit.
The plan does indicate filling in a portion of the flood
plain for the site. According to Barr Engineering,
consultants to the Watershed Board, the proposed
encroachment is within the allowed 20 percent encroachment,
and that staff will recommend that the permit be granted.
.Attached to this report is a summary of a traffic study
for the project which was commissioned by Honeywell. This
traffic study relies on an additional ingress- egress point
on to Londonderry Road at the north end of the site.
Currently, the only access to the site is on Lincoln Drive
midway along the Westerly properly line. Although
Londonderry Drive east of Lincoln Drive is a public street,
it currently serves only the residents of Londonderry
Townhomes. The use of Londonderry Drive by Honeywell will
increase the average daily traffic, on the street from 420
trips to approximately 1,240 trips.
Recommendation
Staff believes that Honeywell has prepared an excellent
plan for expansion on this site. The building addition is
well located, and the design and materials are excellent.
The site is currently well buffered from residential uses to
the north and east by the creek and existing vegetation.
None of this area will be disturbed. New landscaping is
proposed at double Ordinance requirements. New landscaping
along the southerly property line will provide a visual
buffer for the residents of Manor Homes.
At this writing staff has not received a copy of the
final traffic report commissioned by Honeywell. It should
be available for the Commissions meeting. There are several
traffic related issues that should be addressed.
1. County Road 18 - Londonderry Interchange. The
Interchange currently becomes quite congested during peak
hours. The installation of signals at the ramps in 1986
should help relieve this congestion.
2. Honeywell site access. Staff feels that the site
should have two access points. The use of Londonderry Drive
appears to be the most appropriate location.
3. Londonderry Drive Design. The plans submitted
illustrate Londonderry as a entry only to the Honeywell
site. Staff would prefer to see a full cul de sac at the
end of Londonderry. This would allow snow plows and other
traffic to turn around without using townhouse property.
Staff hopes to meet with Honeywell and representatives
of Londonderry Townhomes prior to the Commission meeting to
resol -ve— issues r-e1a- t- ing— to— Londonder -r -y— Drive -.
' Lindberg Pierce, Inc. Architects
Suite 710
r 600 First Ave. North
IMinneapolis. Minnesota 55403 James H. Lindberg
(612) 332 -3339 Robert L. Pierce
c�
November 22, 1985
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: Mr. Craig Larson, Planning Director
Re: Honeywell -Edina II Facility
Dear Mr. Larson:
N
Enclosed is the Final Development Plan application for the Honeywell Edina
' Facility located at 5901 South County Road 18. The required check in the
1 amount of $200.00 is attached to the application.
Two sets of eight drawings on 30" x 42" prints, plus one set of the same
drawings reduced to 8z" x 11 ", are attached for your review:
A -1 Site Plan
A -2 Exterior Building Elevations
L -1 Existing Landscape Plan
L -2 Proposed Landscape Plan
C -1 Storm Sewer, Grading and Paving Plan
M -1 Site Utilities Plan
E -1 Site Lighting Plan
Boundary Survey
The following supporting data is also attached to facilitate your review of
the project.
Zoning Review
Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Review
Traffic Study Synopsis
Neighborhood Informational Meeting
Details of the following:
Existing Parking Lot Lighting
Curb
Curb Ramp
Catch Basin
City of Edina
November 22, 1985
Page Two
A copy of the complete traffic study is available for your review and
will be presented to you next week.
We are available to answer any questions you or your staff may have.
Please call at your convenience.
Sincerely,
6mes H. Lind erg
enclosures-
cc: Honeywell - Duane Miedtke
TM TO BE $03ADVED
PECCUO A TREE To BE RUMAT® Y
COWDOUS TREE TO HE RU=ATM
E70Qi1q OECEUMa TRU TD RBMN C
E)=TW0 001F8101A TREE TO F E 1AN
all! i
_ r I
rj 3 -
\ 0 Ki; was.
\ I
t CIO
7 12
-�) I � MI1� 1►nYr�n� A1r� • � �
SRa Plan - 11"% '■"�,.,i*+r��I
L .b
- _ big 1
w
1
ij
.. _ .- YY�1•Y�•
+�rir. rylYy�y ••►+y.. iYY�YYJ, Yp4YY� .YY•1 -- .... ,
sne alas - .
W.. � rr•Y
r� W. rwlr• Y A
YL
r
r
Y�IW.r�
I
-
�'
I ` =� � I � � i t ♦ emu. � � s
�� J : / /il \� - -�� � —�� � � .. Vii.. Y •..�.. . { 1 i
J
C
1
Site Plan co
I
I�' J
I'
Site Plan
I
•'�" W. M�wld �•
w��r
7 7 r
J1
G � /
1 I C
r 1�1L- 11r1 y� /l
EF
�� it •�, '1 I
She Plan
• ,rte � a-/
• �r�Y�,• •tea �
= rY•�•i •414 : ( a•m • •: � Y �
AMR
W. rYY M IY
f
�
C
C •
• ,rte � a-/
• �r�Y�,• •tea �
= rY•�•i •414 : ( a•m • •: � Y �
AMR
W. rYY M IY
f
- o -
O:o OCR 1SiNa i`p. O
. ♦�0�6 e�ti�t� A�o�;pA� o
�; +-�tt �r . � 0:J'�-..' yam.'.. ��'�1."�EJ�iN�a■
WE=
Vii• '� � � � f�'�r.�lfti..�'...�iliiwrr
.s'. .•i, : � /' i :• O �\ � �r_ re s.,wc..�..tirrwr_
�s.. k•_ r �l f' j ` � .� --` �.7 r -o rs�y•+- r7�rva+z
. Ap 0 �- A�J � .�'• 0��2CS�.ov'i�wcrrr•
I�, ra �J /j ,�, a� °.� e • �fiii ct+�i?.%'x L'SmCifiZ
1/ �• :. %a�. `� t4= .L' =Sm�, :3 �lc7{i�4i:iirC
6dllt"11.lFel?pF�LA' 6"=
r v o
r,: .t � O i =0 Urn :�;• P l'.�t. :'Zt�!p�
�r:1'as!;- ►Elm -r•
0 �
a�
- I —.•• •� I ' '•�•w+� i �'�.�� i art .wrn� . W +..�..�. WIM�14i - - - "1 �WY..Yt. �Y•fl•II. •-WrY -�r�
BOUNDARY &-TOPOGRAPHIC- SLjRYEY- _ _ .
AV
ly
7.
_ • TT--±— -; � 1' -� \ .�:F'�•'' `•1 '. \•:'. L\ r rte-- ^-r ..
PST' P '�� I 1' 1 {� ./ 'I, �F• I ''t ma=r- `
• _ / -�/ -•, - � ^' • 1, I `\ .'� •`' i tii. 4 �`!;,,,a . i7•� ,,
V it ! ! _'.� /y,' �.. c '•.. ,-
i
I
i
k
i
ZONING REVIEW
Honeywell
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
Prepared by:
Project Name:
Project Location:
Legal Description
Zoning Ordinance:
District:
Land Area:
Existing Building:
Existing Parking:
David J. Kelly
Lindberg Pierce, Inc.
dated: September 18, 1985
revised: November 22, 1985
Honeywell Edina II
5901 South County Road 18
Edina, Minnesota
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1145, Files of Registrar
of Titles, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota
City of Edina, Minnesota
Zoning Ordinance No. 825
Adopted March 5, 1984
Zoned Planned Industrial District (PID) as indicated on City
of Edina zoning map - undated.
947,321.5 square feet
2 -story office building; 48,384 s.f. /floor, 96,768 total s.f.
498 stalls
Gross Floor Area Calculations
o Existing Facility
Total gross area
96,768
s.f.
- exceptions
8,224
s.f.
Gross floor area
88,544
s.f.
o New Facility
Total gross area
197,724
s.f.
- exceptions
28,034
s.f.
Gross floor area
169,690
s.f.
o Total gross floor area
258,234
s.f.
(Section 3, Paragraph D:
Definitions)
P o Lindberg Pierce, Inc, Architects
Suite 710 600 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612- 332 -3339
1
Building Coverage Computations
Upper floor new facility 69,988
Upper floor existing facility 48,384
Total 118,372 s.f.
Required Parking
Based on an evaluation of the anticipated uses of the overall facility (i.e.,
new and existing), the following percentages were used to calculate the required
parking:
Office 44% 113,623 s.f.
Research 41% 105,876 s.f.
Warehouse 15% 38,735 s.f.
100% 258,234 s.f.
o Office gross floor area =
0.00025 CFA + 195
113,623 =
0.00025 x 113,623 -+195
509 stalls
(Section 8, Paragraph A:22)
o Warehouse
1 stall x 38,735 s.f. _
2,000 s.f.
20 stalls
(Section 8, Paragraph A:24(b))
oResearch
1 stall x 105,876 s.f. _
500 s.f.
212 stalls
(Section 8, Paragraph A:24(d))
o Total Number of stalls required
Office 509
Research 212
Warehouse 20
Total 741 stalls
Total number of stalls provided: 763
Ir
14
oHandicapped stalls required
(1) handicapped stall per 50 stalls or fraction thereof
Total number of stalls provided _763 = 15.3
50
16 handicapped stalls
(MN UBC 5502.e)
Parking Setbacks
a20 feet from street
a10 feet from interior side lot
20 feet from north property line (Duncan Lane)
20 feet from west property line (Lincoln Drive)
10 feet from south property line
10 feet from east and northeast property lines
(Section 8, Paragraph D)
Parking Design and Construction
a Sizes
(a) Full size
Angle Space Width
900 8 1/2 feet
(b) Compact
900 7 112 feet
o Compact Parking Stalls
Maximum allowed
20% of total
20% x 763 stalls = 153 stalls
(Section 8, Paragraph E)
cHandicapped stalls: size
Minimum 12 foot wide stall
Space Length
18 feet
16 feet
Drive Aisle Width
24 feet
24 feet
NOTE: No compact parking
stalls are to be
provided.
3
i
r
r
i
Loading Facilities
a Size
(a) Large berth
Length Width
55 feet 14 feet
(b) Small berth
25 feet 12 feet
(Section 9, Paragraph D)
o Over 100,000 square
feet GFA
1 large berth
3 small berths
(Section 9, Paragraph E: 2)
Maximum Building Coverage
1345% of site area
.45 x 947,321.5 s.f. _
426,295 s.f. allowable
(Section 17, Paragraph C: 4(b))
Maximum Floor Area Ratio
E350% of site area
.50 x 947,321.5 s.f. _
473,661 s.f, allowable
(Section 17, Paragraph C: 5)
Height
15 feet
15 feet
1 small berth and 1 large berth, plus 1
additional small berth for each 100,000
square feet GFA, or major fraction thereof,
over the original 100,000 square feet GFA.
4
i
r
r
i
i
i
i
i
A
Building Setbacks
13 Front Street 50 feet
o Side Street 50 feet
75 feet if located across street
from residential area
a Interior Side Yard 20 feet 100 feet if abutting residential
area
o Rear Yard 20 feet Building height if greater
50 feet from west property line (Lincoln Drive)
75 feet from north property line (Duncan Lane)
100 feet from south property line (abuts residential)
100 feet from east property line (abuts residential)
36 feet from northeast property line (building height)
(Section 17, Paragraphs C: 6 /C: 7 /D: 1 & 2)
Maximum Building Height
t+
a4 stories or 50 feet, whichever is less.
Average building height along north elevation is 40 feet.
(Section 17, Paragraph C: 7)
5
NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED REVIEW
Honeywell
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
The proposed development has been reviewed with Barr Engineering Company, con -
sultants to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The site has been designed
within the guidelines established b the Watershed
Y District. The staff recom-
mended approval of a watershed permit and presented the project to the Board on
Wednesday, November 20, 1985. The Board did not object to the project or the con -
templated use of a small portion of the flood plain. The application for a permit
was tabled until the December meeting to determine if a permit had ever been given
to a previous owner of the property.
The Watershed District does allow 20% of the land within the flood plain controlled
by the property owner to be removed from the flood plain for development purposes.
The proposed grading plan indicates excess excavation material to be
placed on
r the east side of the site. A portion of this will be within the flood plain,
however less than half of the allowable 20% reclamation will be utilized. The
flood plain will be protected during construction by a temporary silt fence.
All new construction will be over 50 feet away from Nine Mile Creek.
The existing storm sewer piping has been designed for a 10 year storm. Two of the
piping links will experience surcharge conditions under the new development plan
and a 10 year storm; however, the reaction is definitely not deleterious to the
parking lot operation. The existing storm drainage system passes through a
Lsump prior to discharge. This will be maintained for sediment control. Anew
i rip -rap basin will be constructed at the outfall for erosion control.
o Lindberg Pierce, Inc,
Suite 710 600 First Avenue North Architects
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612- 332 -3339
!i • Honeywell TRAFFIC STUDY SYNOPSIS
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
To form the basis for a design that would minimize the impact of the Honeywell
Edina facility expansion on the neighborhood, a traffic study was commissioned
to measure and analyze the pattern and role of Honeywell employees on the surround -'-
ing area.
Employees who will occupy the new facility are present Honeywell employees.
Their approach pattern to the area is primarily from the north via County Road
18. 87% of the existing traffic in and out of the Honeywell site is from or to
the north, along Lincoln Drive.
The traffic was monitored at the site in mid - August, 1985, by hose count and
manual count. Mechanical counters were installed at all four corners.of the
t
intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Drive, at the Honeywell entrance
and across Lincoln Drive south of the Honeywell entrance. Manual counts were
Imade at the intersection of Lincoln and Londonderry Drives and at the Honeywell
entrance. The average daily traffic calculations are attached.
The existing site traffic generation was 1550 vehicles per day. There are
approximately 350 employees working in the existing building. This amounts
to 4.4 trips per employee which is above the national average of approximately
3.1 trips per day for similar buildings. Present employees are located in
several buildings within the area necessitating coordination trips into the
Edina facility. Expansion of the facility will provide space to consolidate
the employees. Design criteria established for the expanded facility requires
restaurant quality dining facilities to be constructed. It is felt that the
c Lindberg Pierce, Inc, Architects
Suite 710 600 First Avenue_ North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612-332-3339
Honeywell
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
re- organization /consolidation''of employees, coupled with a quality dining facility
will lower the vehicle trips per person. Analysis of projected vehicle trips are
based on an anticipated 3.3 trips per person, with the worst case of 4 trips per
person.
The impact of "rush hour" traffic generated by the facility is diminished by
Honeywell allowing employees to use flexible hours. Employees come and leave work
within a two hour period.
o Lindberg Pierce, Inc, Architects
Suite 710 600 First Avenue North
Minneapolis, Minnesota . 55403 612-332 -3339
1. EXISTING TRAFFIC
Honeywell
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
c Lindberg Pierce, Inc,
Suite 710 600 First Avenue_ North Architects
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612- 332-3339
FACTOR
16 HR.
LOCATION HOSE AVERAGE
16
MANUALOCOUNT
TO 24UHR.
T(3)S
SUM
(1) +(4)
AVERAGE
FACTORON
0 5%
LONDONDERRY
ROAD (1) 7473
7133
10%
7846
15,319
7660
8042
DUNCAN
LANE (2) 385
391
5%
411
796
398
418
LINCOLN
DRIVE NORTH
(3) 3832
3332
10%
3665
7,497
-3748
3936
LINCOLN
DRIVE SOUTH
(4) 4486
4218
10%
4640
9,126
4563
4791
HONEYWELL
ENTRANCE (5) 1465
1395
5%
1465
2,930
1465
1538
LINCOLN DRIVE
NORTH (6) 4486
4162
10%
4578
9,064
4532
4759
LINCOLN DRIVE
SOUTH (7) 3420
3139
10%
3453
6,873
3436
3608
NB
SB
EB
WB
A.A.D.T. (1)
8040y
3780
4260
(2)
420
210
210
(3)
3940
1850
2090
--
--
Site (4)
4780
2530
2250
--
--
Generation (5)
1550
--
--
775
775
1550 VPD (6)
4780
2530
2250
--
--
(7)
3600
1980
1620
--
--
c Lindberg Pierce, Inc,
Suite 710 600 First Avenue_ North Architects
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612- 332-3339
SOo y4
®'�7801253oN � 2250
Hor► 6'f of �UL
C075
r
(GO bc�- l 13 c/o
O7 3(0 op/ 191, o rl
201 219 E -2� l to �!
,
,
,
e
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES average daily traffic
\I
��'r'F/C�= FYiW»'N� u!If<I�Y� [tiP?A�'iF.%IG`�hn'M96R.7�It F.Q51`nT '.',+IMr1!K:41F
t." bL`•. aW'! RtaJ-• a. 7r11t •rCrfi.*ti'f�w +?p!pNM'f�hhtrRrM ,.. �,t .: t .at � y , ^' ;; � �
1': wr�.41�•;f.'.,V.'..'.y. a;;u ti t�'•. �i.t :;TPrr:t!tK:
,
Ian W,7 likia "a Flia 11MIll RQJ am MA Iwo Sim
6910/ 15 e -FCv95W 12 •0. .�20/ f7. ►o C LJOH -
Londonderry
Townhouses `
=-. NEW ; � `
. ,iz R7
did s
MW CCIANSM
STAFF - -
OwrDOMADM
• - - %_
` tw ",-a '
. ?63 TAtl3 - - -
204 [77 11%-
I�gv 5 Residential —
ME PLAN / ROOF PLAN �..•��
Projected Site Traffic anticipated average daily traffic
Honeywell � Lm,,�.k
i� &W Law ma IMII am ® ® is {�91 d7 � no No ® Ki � �Ihil..
�86� 20go 5
9 �►v� -375; EA 20/210 e � 210
Londonderry
- Townhouses
1210/ r05
HOP E;Y:J 5 L.t,
745
t50 . 14
3%2%o"MI�
IW�oS
•� "- �T— ' MEM EvMODM - � �
• ` _ .ECSvvp `
TRLXWA
H
1790
OW srwRw .•?
..� -.2&3 TALLS
i
SE PA FKSQ
294 !AA.L3
— - - - - Residential
3rrE PLAN / ROOF PLAN
worst Projected Site Traffic' • • • • - daily
. .1. Ti. '- /,��'i' i;�i�: t:� tS•!I•'.1Ti''�i:Y•!:_,'."'t^f.c ti:- _':SM:y..— ;44,
• �'1!`fYA R• tr 71 :?' Mk':•T li-° 114��:'. Yis. tqY. �.°. �1�-'^:` �% l '�tt-:.W!S;&jQW�:ia,>rLc!�
r 7Z` rR4t
4 i
1
• NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING
Honeywell
Edina Facility Expansion
Edina, Minnesota Project Number 8538
Honeywell, Inc. mailed out invitations to all persons within 500 feet of the site
inviting them to attend an informational meeting on Tuesday, November 19, 1985.
Twelve neighbors attended the meeting. Proposed development plans were presented.
Questions and comments were encouraged from the neighboring residents. Informal
discussions with all those attending took place before and after the presentation.
The neighbors living in
the site, were the most
cern appeared to be the
it would generate. The
gestion at the existing
into the,site for emerge
the Londonderry Townhouses, immediately to the north of
concerned about the proposed development. The main con -
new north driveway off Duncan Lane and the traffic that
north entry was developed to help alleviate traffic con -
Lincoln Drive entrance and to provide two means of entry
m cy vehicles. The entry would be restricted to auto-
mobile traffic only. Anticipated average daily traffic would be 820 cars.
The new north entry is presently being re- analyzed in response to the neighbors
concerns. A possible alternative to the proposed two -way drive would be to
change it to a one -way entrance only. This would alleviate the neighbors
anticipated concerns of having to compete with traffic leaving the Honeywell
site. This has been expressed in a follow -up letter to Mr. John Loper,
president of the Londonderry Townhouse Association.
Q Lindberg Pierce, Inc, Architects' -
Suite 710 600 First Avenue__ North
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403 612- 332-3339
r •
Londonderry Townhouse Association
5.712 Duncan Lane a Edina, Minnesota 55436
The undersigned, who are all owners of Londonderry
townhouses, do hereby petition the Hdina City Council to
deny to Honeywell the right to construct a road into
their property from Duncan Lane, which is the only
entrance and exit road for the Londonderry to nes.
S
7 /", Q�
3 i /) Yi? p.) 0 dy -Y yI
Londonderry Townhouse Association
5712 Duncan Lane • Edina, Minnesota 55436
The undersigned, who are all owners of Londonderry
townhouses, do hereby petition the Sdina City Council to
deny to Honeywell the right to construct a road into
their property from Duncan Lane, which is the only
entrance and exit road fer the Londonderry townhoaes.
717
S 7 • / Wb u..w Y"..
7 1 3
-
�
Londonderry Townhouse Association
5712 Duncan Lane • Edina, Minnesota 55436
The undersigned, who are all owners of Londonderry
townhonses, do hereby petition the US= City Council to
deny to Honeywell the right to construct a road into
their property from Duncan Lane, which is the only
entranoe and exit road for the Londonderry townhouse.
3 '' •c
570
S 7/Z
I
Londonderry Townhouse Association
5712 Duncan Lane • Edina, Minnesota 55436
The undersigned, who are all owners of Londonderry
townhouses, do hereby petition the Edina City Council to
deny to Honeywell the right to construct a road Into
their property from Duncan Lane, which Is the only
entrance and exit road for the Londonderry townhomes.
41
<
Honeywell
20 November 1985
DAVID O.OPHEIM
Staff Executive
Mr. John N. Loper
5725 Duncan Lane
Edina, MN 55436
Dear Mr. Loper:
This letter is in follow -up to our meeting with you and your neighbors
regarding the concept we'have developed for expansion of our facility in
Edina. We trust you felt the meeting was worthwhile and that we were
attentive to your questions and concerns.
As you know, in response to concerns expressed by you and the other members
of the Londonderry Townhane Association, we agreed to reexamine our approach
to a second driveway into the property which is currently proposed to be off
Duncan Drive. We found the comments and concerns expressed by the neighbors
to be of merit and have taken them into account in a reanalysis of this
aspect of the concept.
As a result of this reanalysis, we have decided to modify our approach to the
second entrance and will do so providing the City of Edina concurs. We
believe that you will find the modification will alleviate many of the
concerns expressed
Essentially, this modification will be the conversion of the driveway road
from two-way to a one -way entrance only. We would narrow the road to a
single lane exiting off Duncan Drive at the. point previously indicated with
elimination of the large turn- around area in the previous concept.
Basically, this would continue to provide for the second entrance for
emergency vehicles which the City of Edina recommended. It would also remove
all concern over traffic congestion exiting Duncan Avenue, particularly in
the winter. The only Honeywell traffic on Duncan Drive would be a smooth
flow of entrance traffic which will not affect residential entrance or exit.
Lastly, reduction of the road size would enable us to increase the green area
and tree planning area adjoining Nine Mile Creek on the Londonderry/Honeywell
border.
We trust that these alterations to our concept, made in response to your
caiments and concerns, will meet with your approval. We are sincere in our
efforts to be a good neighbor, not only to Londonderry Townhane Association
but all those who adjoin our properties. We will be happy to further discuss
this or any other issues with you that you may desire. Should you have any
questions or comments regarding this alterations in our plans in response to
your concerns please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Defense Systems Division, Honeywell Inc.
5840 Smetana Drive. Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343.872/831-7028
Ar. John Loper
120 November 1985
Page 2
I should also comment that since this modified concept would still result in
us sharing at least part of Duncan Drive with you, you can rest assured that
we will join with you and the City of Edina in assuring that Duncan Drive is
adequately maintained and cleaned in the winter time.
„ Very truly yours,
;arm
01"All r [•l; m ►'j IAl\
.A
A-:
•RMS1■'FA"I•
X11► /_�:��� \►1►11► [��1�:�� \:
1I �� LD -85 -12
J' I
David Shank and Suzyn Ware
4301 -05 West 62nd Street
IMr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are
requesting a party wall division of an existing double
bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided. Staff
recommends approval.
Mr. Gordon Johnson moved for approval of the party wall
division. Mr. Del Johnson seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
IV. ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:25 P.M.
Respectfully Submitted,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 4, 1985
LD -85 -12 David Shank and Suzyn Ware
4301 -05 West 62nd. Street
Refer to: Attached survey.
The proponents are requesting a party wall division of an
existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are
provided.
Recommendation
Approval.
top
"S -
srP
�. , . QE/tICIIJ�I�AIL Eb►'` z ' aEUEe d'- •
E +�N d9'3T /5`W r1R aEYA". a� �
23 ze — - z oil
be, - /7/.90, -- �. - , _ X9.25..
b� PROP ED gIY
N DR/ ENWYN i
lop 11.47
w° sex _ PARCE a smaarr:
` A �$�
M
f
EP 00* BLhWALDW
°1°`'' `` 'PARCEL , o
.o
F' v jo a%
1�` W DECK
3MZM SEWER PAMOLf �y 1 -cO Sv ,A. 90' i Q
r.` `..
- a
PARCEL 3:
k j
l� ? The Ea.at 45:33 6ee_t o,4 the lol..Poiv ng deac�eibed F•w.epetty: That eant oS the 'JOtth. 334 x +
beet 06 the '!a- tth!reet ,ua,t.teR 06 the No,%theut ,)ua,%te4 tying emit o6 the Weet 658.6
beet the4eo6 an,{ lying we6t o� the went Line 8tookview Avenue etirended to the north
tine
c6 the eat', Vonticvee.t ^wtrteA o f the Nontlmut Quaatoa in Soc *ion 30, Town6h.ip 1 a +
28, Range 24, the we.6t boundary o6 said tract i6 mwAked ii.cao Landmatke set at
1 the aouthwe6t eatne.it t:lereo6 and at a point on the we6t theteo4 110.25 beet 6outh
C6 .tl:e %!c.triu"r.6• colt —, t'IF +.cc•S, rr ^r. t N; -1 .rttion c•[ ,.. Rbn�•n .{o. +.• ^ti!.r{ tr�c* Juinn
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
That part of the North 334 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter lying east of the West 658.5 feet thereof and lying
west of the west line of Brookview Avenue extended to the north line
of the said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter in Section 30,
Township 28, Range 24, the west boundary of said tract is marked by
Judicial Landmarks set at the southwest corner thereof and at a point
on the west line thereof 110.25 feet south of the Northwest corner
thereof, except that portion of the above described tract lying
southwesterly of the following described line constituting the center
line of Valley View Road; Beginning at a point on the north line of
the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30 distant 549.79 feet east of
the northwest corner thereof; thence running southeasterly at an
angle of 26036' with said north line, when measured from east to south
for a distance of 500 feet and there terminating.
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A: That part of the North 334 feet of the Northwest Quarter
of the Northeast. Quarter lying east of the West 658.5 feet thereof
and lying west of the west line of Brookview Avenue extended to the
north line of the said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
in Section 30, Township 28, Range 24 the west boundary of said
tract;-is marked by Judicial Landmarks set at the southwest corner
thereof and at a point on the west line thereof 110.25 feet south
of the Northwest corner thereof, except that portion of the above
described tract lying southwesterly of the following described
line constituting the center line of Valley View Road; Beginning at
a point on the north line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30
distant 549.79 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence
running southeasterly at an angle of 260 36' with said north line,
when measured from east to south for a distance of 500 feet and
there terminating. Also except the East 45.33 feet of the above
described tract; and
Parcel B: The East 45.33 feet of the following described property:
That part of the North 334 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter lying east of the West 658.5 feet thereof and
lying west of the west line Brookview Avenue extended to the north
line of the said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter in
Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, the west boundary of said tract
is marked by Judicial Landmarks set at the southwest corner thereof
and at a point on the west line thereof 110.25 feet south of the
Northwest corner thereof, except that portion of the above described
tract lying southwesterly of the following described line constitut-
ing the center line of Valley View Road; Beginning at a point on
the north line of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 30 distant
549.79 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence running
southeasterly at an angle of 260 36' with said north line, when
measured from east to south for a distance of 500 feet and there
terminating. Except the North 33 feet thereof, as set forth in
Book 2035 of Deeds, page 415.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or
as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provisions that
no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with
the pertinentordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of
this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 1985, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of December, 1985.
City Clerk
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: City Mayor and
Y y Counc ci 1
ROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Planager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEtYI IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
- Six_'(6)_ 1986 -Full- size - -Po -lice Pursuit-vehicles-
Quotations/Bids:
Com any Amount of Ouote or Bid
1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $69,144.00
1801 East County Rd "F"
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2. Brookdale Ford $69,330.00
2500 County Rd 410
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Superior Ford $72,924.00
9700 56th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55442
Department Recommendation: Low Bidder - Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not
el ~� P/I
Signature Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
Ci,ty�M Wager's Endorsement:
U %j. N, uaien, Finance Director
v 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase. A
_ 2. I recommend as an alternative:
neth Rosland, Vi Cy
nager
I
A
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
ROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
One (1) 1986 1/2 Ton Carryall, Nine Passenger, 4 -Wheel Drive
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
1801 East County Rd "F"
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2.
ONLY BID RECEIVED
Department Recommendation: Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$13,797.00
w
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓ is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
jr t ti
J. N. DaIen, Finance Director
City_Manaaer's Endorsement:
••' 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Counci approve
the purchase. .
_ 2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kennethl . sland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Six (6) 1986 Full -size Police Pursuit Vehicles
Quotations /Bids:
Com any Amount of Ouote or Bid
�. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $69,144.00
1801 East County Rd "F"
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2. Brookdale Ford $69,330.00
2500 County Rd 410
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
3. Superior Ford $72,924.00
9700 56th Avenue North
Plymouth, MN 55442
Department Recommendation: Low Bidder - Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
PC C (t_
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is v"' is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
Ci,ty�M naaer's Endorsement:
U U. N. uaien, Finance Director
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
s l and, tai ty
ager
r
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: -Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Planager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 4, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
One (1) 1986 1/2 Ton Carryall, Nine Passenger, 4 -Wheel Drive
Quotations /Bids:
Com any
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
1801 East County Rd "F"
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2.
ONLY BID RECEIVED
3.
Department Recommendation: Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is P/ is not
5��6
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$13,797.00
,
Signature Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
i r N
�. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City.Manager's Endorsement: V
•� 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Counci approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: _
KennethlRosland, City M4nager
I:EQUEST FOR: PURCMSE
E
- 1
T6: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Direcotr of Public Works
iIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manaeer
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 12, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Two Dump Trucks-with Box
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. See attached tabulation
2.
-gr_ C
Amount of Quote or Bid
Department P.ecormendation: North Star International with La Hass Box $87,304.00
• _ '��' Public Works.- Street
Signat re - Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid( is is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City tanager's Endorsement:
�1. I concur with the reconrnenda i n
t o of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
E
Dump Truck with Box
North Star International with Midland Box $41,480.00
Mac Queen Box $41,635.00
La Hass Box $43,652.00
Astleford International with Midland Box $41,778.00
Crysteel Box $43,683.00
La Hass Box $43,950.00
Brookdale Ford with Midland Box $42,678.00
La Hass Box $44,892.50
Boyer Ford with La Hass Box $44,560.00
Superior Ford with Crysteel. Box $45,756.00
La Hass Box $46,098.00
..
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works
FROM: Gene Bartz, Superintendent of Public Works
SUBJECT: Bids for Dump Trucks
DATE: December 12, 1985
I am recommending that the bid for 2 (two) new dump trucks be awarded
to North Star International with Lahass body for $43,731.00 @.
The bid for the Midland body at $41,480.00 does not meet our specifica-
tions; Midland is not an authorized dealer for Perfection Hoist (see
attached letter) and their body is not approved by Perfection.
This situation could cause serious warranty problems for us as well as
safety and legal ramifications in the future.
Additionally, because of the many uses we have for our dump trucks,
the Heil body by McQueen is not recommended nor does it meet our
speci i ations.
GB: jr
!� REQUEST FOR PURMASE 7- U
TO: Mayor and,: ,City Caunci l
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City flan6ver
SUBJECT: REN EST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 12, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Two (2) 1/2 Ton Pick -Ups' (One for Public Works - Street Dept)
(One for Park Dept.)
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1• Thane Hawkins Chevrolet $ 9,297.00
2. Brookdale Ford 9,779.00
3.. Superior Ford' 9,941.00
Department Recommendation: Thane'Hawkin5 Chevrolet $ 9,297.00
,Public Works - Street
5ignatfdre Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid � is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City ttanager's Endorsement:
I concur with the recon:ncndation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City ;tanager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City fianager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 12, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
One Ton Cargo Van
Quotations /Bids:
Com any
1• Thane Hawkins Chevro,jet
_jsz;r, ,5
Amount of Quote or Bid
$11,597.00
2. Superior Ford 11,689.00
14. Brookdale Ford = 11973.00
Department Recommendation: Thane Hawkins-Chevrolet $11,597.00.
` Publ i c Works.- Street
Sign re _ Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
Ci ty 111 naner's Endorsement:
l� 1. I concur with the recoir.nendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nelii Rosland, City i•lanager
a
1
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 11, 1985
TO: Robert J. Buresh, Director of Public Safety
FROM: Frank Wellman, Assistant Fire Chief- W
SUBJECT: Recommendation Awarding Bids
On December 2, 1985, the City of Edina received three (3) bids for a new 1500 GPM
Pumper. Two of the bids meet the specifications very closely to what we asked for.
One of the bids, Laverne, bid their own model, Command Cab, which does not meet our
specifications.
Bid #1 -- General Safety Equipment Cor oration -- bid $137,771, with a deduction of
1, 00 if we pay for the chassis, $55,500, when it is delivered in about four months.
Their completion date, 200 -241 working days or about one year.
Bid #2 -- Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc -- bid $139,835, with a deduction of $2,500
if we pay for the chassis, $51,000, when it is delivered in about four months.
Their completion date, 120 -160 working days or about 8 months.
The City of Edina is willing to pay for the chassis when it is delivered, so the
actual difference in the bids is $1,364 in favor of General Safety Equipment Corp.
In 1977, we took delivery of a General Pumper. In 1978, a few of the cabinet doors
were repainted, as rust was forming around the door latches. In 1980, there was
a lot of rust surfacing on all of the pumper body. General Safety felt it was due
to the way we maintain the vehicles and we felt it was poor preparation, priming,
caulking and painting of the apparatus. This has been a morale reducer on the
department, as the guys take pride in their equipment. We received no satisfaction
from General Safety in making repairs on this vehicle.
Last year, we had our 1973 pumper reconstructed by General Safety. They have taken
a lot of steps to improve their preparation of a vehicle for painting. At the time
of delivery, we found a few - things that had to be corrected. Two double cabinet
doors were not flush with each other when closed. One stuck out I" from the other.
When cabinet doors were opened next to each other, they could hit, so the door stops
had to be changed. We asked for an adjustable shelf in the left rear compartment
and it is adjustable only on one end. We specified the width of each hose bed and
one was lP too narrow and our 11" hose would not fit into it. General Safety took
care of some of these problems for us. I did receive a phone call from one of their
salesmen, and he said Edina was too picky.
The bids were very close to each other. My recommendation is to award the bid to
Custom Fire Apparatus as follows:
Bid including trade of 1958 Pirsch pumper $139,835
Deduct for pre - paying chassis ($51,000).........$ -2,500
Deduct for side officer's mask bracket .......... $ - 100
BID TOTAL:
$137,235
Memo to Buresh
' December 11, 1985
Page 2
OPTION EQUIPMENT BID:
Oswald (must be ordered before December 23, 1985)•....$6,121.00
Mid Central (exception on 4" hose; will supply Angus).$7,840.00
Fire Safety & Communications
(exception on 4" hose; will supply Angus).$7,588.00
Custom Fire Apparatus ............ .....................$6,200.00
General Safety Equipment Corp ... ......................$6,930.00
Laverne Fire Apparatus .......... ......................$6,759.00
Conway Fire and Safety..(bid received 12/3/85)........$6,864.50
My recommendation is to award the bid to Oswald Fire Hose Company for the bid
of $6,121.00
FGW /ras
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
ROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and REcreation Department
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 10, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Repair and labor for Braemar Pavilion emergency - breakdown
Quotations /Bids:
Company AMOUht of Ouote or Bid
1. Gartner Refrigeration - emergency repair $10,581.44
3529 Raleigh Ave. S.,. Mpls., Mn 55416
2.
Department Recommendation:
Finance Director's Endorsem t.
The recommended bid is 7
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
N. uaien, tinance Director
City Wager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
_ 2. I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHMSE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 12, 1985
Material Description (General'Specifications):
Wing and Plow for Loader
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�• La Hass Manufacturing & Sales
2. Little Falls Machine
3. Ziegler, Inc.
_P77— A!
Amount of Quote or Bid
$6,946.00.
$7,485.00
$17,118.00
Department Recommendation: La Hass-Manufacturing & Sales $6,946.00
C
Finance Director's Endorsement: -
The recommended bid is not
City tt nager's Endorsement:
1. I concur tiri the reco�:re
the purcflase. ndation of the Department and recommend Council approve
2. I recoirrend as an alternative: �J
Public Works - Street
Signatur Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
Kenrieth Rosland, City 1.1anager
i
i
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE rrT
TO: Mayor and .City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IPA EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 12, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Iron Removal Treatment Plant Repair of Tanks.
(Part-of project, plant undergoing major overhaul)
New. underdrairi- diffuser nozzles
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. ,Tonka Equipment Co. $5,760.00.
(Sole supplier of ABS Plastic Diffuser Nozzles)
2.
Department Recommendation: Tonka Equipment Co. $5,760.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid � is not
Public Works.- Utility
Signat a Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
H. Dalen, f
nance Director
City / -tanager's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenn tit
stand, /City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
T0: Mayor and .'City Council
ROM: John ftl I i n, F nance
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City tlanage'r
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEh1 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: Decenber 13, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Replace e)d sting heater and AG on roof at 50th Street Store
Peovi de al 1 requi red duct ng roof curbi ng and other servi ces to make new
uni t operat i onal .
Quotations /Bids:
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1 • Centrai re $13,749.00
2. Northwestern Servi ces
PA dl.and
Department Recommendation: Centraire for $13,749.00
14, 446.00
14, 500.00
F nance
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
. N. uaien, H nance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: /J _
etn Kos'land, City
nager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: "Mayor and City Counci l K
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: Dec. 11, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
175 Chairs for Braemar Club House
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1.
Pink
175
@
$39.39
$6,893.25
13405 15th Ave. No., Mpls., MN
55 441
Mpls., MN 55441
2.
Palm Brothers
175
C
$43.60
$7,644.00
2727 Nicollet, Mpls., MN .55408
3,
General Office Products
175
C
$94.35
$16,511.25
4521-Hwy 7, Mpls., MN 55416
4.
Hendrickson & Associates
175
@
$51.00
$ 8,925.00
275 Market St., Mpls., MN 55405
Department Recommendation:
Pink
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bi d i s
i
Depa ent
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
u. iv. uaien, rinance Director
City aer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nneth R Bland, City Mpnager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council I
FROM- Bob Koje tin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: Dec. 11, 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Carpting for Main floor - Club House and Pro Shop
(all prices include delivery and installation)
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
Department Recommendation:
Merit Supply
Finance Director's Endorsemenj':.-
The reconanended bid(];—) is not
ep
within the amount budget for the purchase.
1 •
� J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City naaer`s Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
netn Rds l and, 'City
nager
Merit Supply 425yds x
5145 Eden Ave., Edina, MN 55436
$22.00 %yd
$ 9,350
2.
J2820 Indu tries Plymouth,
ymouth,
Karagheusian, Inc.
4405 France Ave. S., Mpls.,
425 yds. x
MN 55447
425 yds x
Mn 55410
$24.45/yd
$22.58%yd
$10,391.25
$ 9,596.50
4.
Pink Company 425 vds x
13404 15th Ave. N., Mpls., MN 55441
$23.25%yd
$ 9,881.25
5.
Lakeville Interiors
P.O. Box 274, Lakeville, MN
425 yds. x $27.09%yd
55044
$11,513.25
Department Recommendation:
Merit Supply
Finance Director's Endorsemenj':.-
The reconanended bid(];—) is not
ep
within the amount budget for the purchase.
1 •
� J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City naaer`s Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
netn Rds l and, 'City
nager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob-•Kojetin, Director, Edina Park and Recreation
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: Dec . 12 , 1985
Material Description (General Specifications):
Electrical for Braemar Club House
Quotations /Bids:
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Ridgedale Electric
$64,077
545 Brimhall Ave.Box 450
Long Lake, MN 55356
2. Edina Electric
$86,590
5'244 Eden Circle
Edina, MN 55436
3. Comm Tech
$89,765
2075 East Center Circle
Plymouth, MN 55441
Department Recommendation:
Ridgedale Electric
Finance Director's Endorsement:._
The recommended bid is/ is not
�Ir -
within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City naaer's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
th Ros 1 and, /Ci ty
nager
;41*4 d I$] IW-val 1:
L�u
III league of minnesota cities
November 26, 1985
TO: MAYORS, MANAGERS, CLERKS
FROM: Ann Higgins, Staff Associate
SUBJECT: TAX REFORM THREAT TO TAX - EXEMPT STATUS OF MUNICIPAL BONDS
AUTHORITY TO ISSUE TAX- EXEMPT BONDS UNDER IMMEDIATE THREAT
Chances are growing that Congress may impose severe restrictions on
traditional uses of municipal bonds. Action by the House Ways and
Means Committee this past weekend signals that House action can be
anticipated soon. Please contact members of the Minnesota
Congressional Delegation (list attached) immediately. Indicate your
opposition, to the proposed sweeping limits and restrictions on cities'
authority to issue municipal bonds. - --
SECRECY SURROUNDS DETAILS OF HOUSE COMMITTEE ACTION
Because Congress is not subject to open meeting requirements, the
currentlyproposed proposed limits on local tax - exempt financings are
the result of closed committee sessions. Actual legislative language
for these proposals is not yet available. Therefore, the information
in the media or provided informally by committee staff or members
serves as the basis for much of what can now be reported.
USE AND LOAN TESTS MAY ELIMINATE TAX - EXEMPT STATUS OF MANY PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT BONDS AND LEAD TO MORE COSTS FOR CITIES
I_t must be clearly understood that proposed federal tax reform
legislation now contains provisions that seriously threaten the
continued use of tax - exempt bonds for public improvements.
According to the actions of the House Wa
issued by state and local government are
tax exempt -only if less than 10 percent
million, whichever is less) is used by a
than 5 percent (or $5 million, whichever
loaned to a trade or business.
ys and Means Committee, bonds
governmental - and therefore
of the bond proceeds (or $10
trade or business and no more
is less) of the proceeds is
It means that cities (as well as other state and local units of
government) will be able to issue tax - exempt bonds only as long as
these use limits or "tests" are not exceeded.
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227 -5600
�1
BOND ISSUES FAILING THESE TESTS ARE TAXABLE AND TERMED NONGOVERNMENTAL
UNLESS AN EXEMPTION APPLIES.
The following categories of municipal bonds fit within the exemption
provided: small issue IDBs, exempt facility IDBs, owner occupied
housing, and 501(c)(3) organization bonds,,BUT
THE TAX EXEMPTION CURRENTLY ALLOWED FOR SOME TYPES OF FACILITIES,
WHETHER'PUBLICLY OR PRIVATELY OWNED, WOULD BE ENDED - SEE BELOW.
THAT LIST INCLUDES INDUSTRIAL PARKS, GAS AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES,
DISTRICT HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEMS, HYDROELECTRIC PLANTS, AIR AND
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITIES, SPORTS, AND CONVENTION AND TRADE
CENTERS.
This means.that municipal G.,O. and revenue bonds for such improvements
would be considered taxable.
"429" improvement bonds for _curb; gutter, or road extensions to
subdivision developments might also be nongovernmental under such a
restriction if .private developers stand to gain by as little as 10
percent of, the proceeds of that bond issue.
MORE RESTRICTIONS
See page.2 of the attached memo for a list of other bond uses which
would automatically be placed under a new pe.r capita volume limit
in which cities would compete to obtain authority to issue tax - exempt
bonds. Note that sewer, solid waste, and municipal water- facilities
are on the list.
What that means is that after January 1, cities must await the
decision of the Governor or the state legislature to find out whether
they will be able to issue bonds for these purposes as well as for any
of the other public purpose listed above that fail the 10 and 5-
percent use and loan tests.
LIMITS ON TAX.INCREMENT FINANCING
Hundreds of Minnesota cities have made effective use of tax increment
financing to assist needed development, to redevelop downtown
commercial and industrial sections, and to provide financing necessary
to aid in housing development. Only a limited number of projects
would remain eligible under the strict limits set by the federal tax
reform proposals.
No acquisition, land write - downs, financing of development costs, etc.
would be considered tax - exempt activity within provisions being
considered by the House Ways and Means Committee. Efforts have been
made to try to gain an exemption for such activities at the local
level, but to date there is no certainty that such changes will be
added.
(All 8 House members of the Minnesota Congressional Delegation have
2
sent a letter to House Ways and Means Committee Chairman,
Representative Rostenkowski, urging him to permit exceptions to the
proposed "tests" to permit the use of tax increment financing.)
To the extent that tax increment bonds are used to finance
improvements such as streets, sidewalks, lighting, etc., their tax -
exempt status appears to have been sustained by actions of the Ways
and Means Committee. But, such bonds issued for redevelopment could
be subject to the new unified volume limits (referred to on page 2 of
the technical information) if proceeds are used for land acquisition
or relocation costs.
EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1 DATE POSES CRITICAL DEADLINE FOR CITY BONDING
AUTHORITY
When contacting your member of Congress and our U.S. Senators,.urge
immediate action to remove the January 1, 1986 effective date now in
the proposals under consideration by the House Ways and Means
Committee. Without such action, the authority of all cities to issue
tax - exempt bonds will be subject to major uncertainties and severe
restrictions for the foreseeable future.
3
Senator Rudy Boschwitz
Senator Dave Durenberger
506 Hart Building
375 Russell Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20510
Washington, D.C. 20510
(202) 224 -5641
(202) 224 -3244
Local Office
Local Office
210 Bremer Bldg.
1020 Plymouth Bldg.
419 N. Robert Street
12 South 6th Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
Minneapolis, MN 55402
(612) 221 -0904
(612) 349 -5111
Toll Free 800/652 -9771
Toll Free 800/752 -4226
Rep. Timothy J. Penny
Rep. Bill Frenzel
501 Cannon Bldg.
1026 Longworth Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225 -2472
(202) 225 -2871
Local Office
Local Office
Blue Earth Government Center
8120 Penn Avenue S.
Box 3148
Suite 445
Mankato, MN 56001
Bloomington, MN 55431
(507) 625 -6921
(612) 881 -4600
Park Towers
22 N. Broadway
Rochester, MN 55904
Rep. Bruce Vento
(507) 281 -6053
2433 Rayburn Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
Rep. Vin Weber
(202) 225 -6631
318 Cannon Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
Local Office
(202) 225 -2331
Rm 150 Mears Park Place
Local Office
405 Sibley Street
St. Paul, MN 55101
P.O.Box 1214
(612) 725 -7724
Marshall, MN 56258
(507) 532 -9611
Rep. Martin Sabo
436 Cannon Bldg.
P. 0. Box 279
Washington, D.C. 20515
New Ulm, MN 56073
(202) 225 -4755
(507) 354 -6400
Local Office
919 - 1st Street
Willmar, MN 56201
462 Federal Courts Bldg.
(612) 235 -6820
Minneapolis, MN 55401
(612) 349 -5110
OVER
Rep. Gerry Sikorski
414 Cannon Bldg.
Washignton, D.C. 20515
(202) 225 -2271
Local Office.
8535 Central Avenue
Blaine, MN 55434
(612) 780 -5801
Rep. Arlan Stangeland
1526 Longfellow Bldg.
Washingtin, MN 20515
(202) 225 -2165
Local'Office
4th F1. MF Center
403 Center Ave-..
Moorhead, MN 56560
(218) 233 -8631
Toll Free 800/432 -3770.
Federal Bldg.
720 St. Germain
St. Cloud, MN 56301
(612) 251 -0740
Rep. James Oberstar
2351 Rayburn Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225 - 6211..
Local Office
Brainerd City Hall
Brainerd, MN 56401
(218) 828 -4400
Chisholm City Hall
Chisholm, MN 55719
(218) 254 -5761
231 Federal Bldg.
Duluth, MN 55802
(218) 727 -7474
J
p Cd(in,LC I /Z /1l r✓
uu
'=' league of minnesota cities
MEMORANDUM November 26, 1985
TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks
FROM: Ann Higgins, Staff Associate
SUBJECT: TECHNICAL INFORMATION ON FEDERAL TAX REFORM PROPOSAL
RESTRICTIONS ON TAX - EXEMPT FINANCING
if -N
Actions taken.by the---,House Ways and Means Committee increase the
potential for major new restrictions on the authority of cities to
issue traditional public purpose bonds. It is estimated that the
following provisions, if adopted by Congress, would reduce the types
of municipal bonds eligible for tax- exempt status by at least 40
percent and subject so- called "nongovernmental" bonds to a new state -
by -state per capita volume limit.
It is vital that cities contact both House and Senate members of the
Minnesota Congressional Delegation to make clear how serious an impact
these intrusions on city authority to issue bonds will have on the
ability of the city to manage public improvements, deliver public
services, and support economic development. Unless members of
Congress can be persuaded to reverse or modify proposed bond
restrictions, it is expected that they will become key provisions of
federal tax reform legislation to be sent to the floor of the U.S.
House of Representatives during the first week of December.
Restrictions on Traditional Public Purpose Bonds
Traditional general obligation, revenue, and tax increment.bonds
would be restricted by a new generic definition, effective January 1,
1986. Bonds would be non - governmental if the lesser of 10 percent or
$10 million of the bond proceeds is used to benefit, directly or
indirectly, any person (trade or business) including 501(e)(3)
organizations other than a governmental entity, and if less than 5
percent (or $5 million) of the proceeds is loaned to a trade or
business.
What does this mean to cities?
It means that cities planning to issue such bonds after January 1,
must check with bond counsel to determine if those bonds meet the use
test described above. Bonds termed non - governmental under terms of
these new limits will be subject to much higher risk re: their tax -
exempt status and therefore be more costly to issue (because bond
1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2) 227 -5600
,e..1. % '
counsels are most likely to issue only qualified opionions as to their
future tax- exempt status).
This follows from the reaction of bond counsel to the prospect of
pending federal legislation (federal tax reform) that potentially
will limit the definition of governmental bonds as noted above.
Whether or not the Senate has acted on the measure by January 1,
bond counsel's concern for liability on this issue will preclude the
chances for "clean" opinions on bond issues where the benefits to
trade or business appear to exceed the 10 percent test.
An example offered by the National League of Cities: if your city
is planning to make improvements to a municipal parking facility
financed with G.O. bonds, you will want to take special care to be
certain that no business receives more than a 10 percent benefit
through either exclusive access or use of a number of reserved
parking places.
A New Per Capita Volume Limit on "Non- Governmental" Bonds
Some municipal.G.O. and revenue bonds that fail the 10 percent test
would-be termed, "non - governmental purpose" bonds and would be included
in a new state -by -state volume cap along with small issue industrial
development bonds (for which the.House Ways and Means Committee has
voted to eliminate the sunset provisions of Dec. 31, 1987).
In addition to those in the above category (public purpose bonds for
publicly owned and operated facililties that fail the 10 percent test),
the following uses would also be permitted, limited by a volume cap.
The cap would place all tax - exempt non - governmental bonds, with the
exception of certain airport and port facilities (excluding
warehouses) under a state limit of $175 per capita - $25 per capita
of which would have to be set aside for non - profit hospitals and
universities, further reducing the volume of tax - exempt financing,. -
authority to $150 per capita for 1986 and 1987. (In 1988., the cap
would decrease to $125, with the sunset of mortgage revenue bonds.)
Of the remaining $150 per capita, $75 would have to be set aside for
housing bonds unless the legislature determines othewise.
* multifamily .rental housing
* some airport and port facilities
* sewage amd solid waste disposal facilities
municipal water facilities
single family housing (until 1988)
* veterans' mortgage bonds
* small issue IDBs (with sunset date eliminated)
* student loan bonds
non - profit university and hospital bonds
Impact for Cities
The proposed per capita volume cap would force cities, other units of
local government including counties and school districts, as well as
state agencies to face the prospect of competing for limited bonding
authority.
Overall housing bond volume nationally would be expected to decline
by at least 10 percent, compared with 1984.
Another.very.ominous prospect is the fact that certain uses of tax -
exempt financing that'fail the 10 .percent test would not be eligible
for tax - exempt financing, effective January 1, 1986.
The following publicly owned and operated.facilities would be
ineligible for tax - exempt financing, under these provisions:
sports facilities
trade and convention centers
parking facilities
* electric energy
gas furnishing facilities
hydroelectric generating facilities
district heating and cooling facilities
industrial parks
* hazardous waste facilities
+� pollution control facilities
Even if municipally owned and operated, these facilities are
considered sufficiently non - governmental in their purpose and
operation that the House Ways and Means Committee has determined that
they shall not retain eligibility for tax - exempt bond financing.
Any non - governmental portion of a governmental issue in excess of
$1 million would also be subject to the volume cap. (That would mean
that in the instance where a governmental issue benefitted a trade or
business by that amount, even though that is less than 10 percent of
the bond proceeds (even as little as 1 percent or less), the portion
exceeds $1 million could not be issued under the sole authority of the
city to determine but would have to be allocated under a statewide
allocation system.
FURTHER PROPOSED RESTRICTIONS ON REFINANCING
Advance refunding of traditional public purpose bonds would continue
to be allowed, but the cost of the new issue could not be recovered
through arbitrage earned on the bond proceeds. Unless the present
volume of interest savings was more than the cost of issuing the
advance refunding bonds, the latter could not exceed 250 percent of
the volume of the refunded bonds.
Advance refunding bonds would also be subject to the same per capita
volume limits of any new non - governmental bond issue (as noted above).
In addition, the call period for such issues would be limited to a
period no earlier than the date they could be called at par or at a
premium of 3 percent or.less. No unlimited arbitrage could be earned
as a result of a provision which would limit such a period for advance
3
V-
refunding bonds to 30 days after issuance and for refunded bonds no
later than the date of issuance of the refunding bond issue.
Finally, bonds for the following non - governmental activities would no
longer be ,eligible for advance refunding:
multi - family, single family and veterans' housing
governmentally owned airports (including land, noise abatement and
freight- handling facilities)
port facilities (not including storage warehouses)
mass commuting facilities
# sewage-and solid waste - disposal facilities
# facilities for furnishing water
small issue IDBS (with all sunsets removed)
* Section 501(c)(3) organization bonds
student loan bonds
(All the above, except housing, sewage and solid waste disposal
facilities, would have to be publicly owned to qualify for tax - exempt
financing.)
Private developments financed.with tax - exempt bonds (except low- income
housing) would have to be depreciated using the straight -line method.
Provisions for multifamily housing more favorable
Apparently, although
capita -volume.cap on
eligibility would be
percent (now 20 %) or
income is 80 percent
or, more of the units
or less of area medi
such housing bonds would be covered by the per
non - governmental bond issues, tax - exempt
retained for all such bond issues if-either 25
more of the units are rented to families whose
or less than the area median income or 20 percent
are rented -to families whose income is 70 percent
an income.
The state volume cap, unless the legislature changed it', would be
allocated ($75 per capita) one third to multifamily, one third to
single:family, and one third left to the discretion of the governor.
CONCLUSIONS
Minnesota cities would retain little authority available under any
allocation system that would be designed to comply with the volume cap.
The total- allocation for all bonding authority under the proposal
would'be $725 million for the state. Of that, only $321.million would
remain for both state and local government bonding authority in 1986.
IDB authority in 1985 in Minnesota totaled $620 million, under the
current volume cap. Add to that $600 million in multifamily.,housing
bonds, at least $200 million in tax increment financing, and $200
million in owner - occupied housing bonds. An incomplete estimate of
of the current level of bond activity would indicate that at least
$1.6 billion of tax- exempt bonds were issued last year. That figure
does not include either the tax - exempt bonds issued by 501(c)(3)
organizations or the portion of governmental purpose bonds that may
4
W
be subject to these new unified per capita volume limits
Actions taken by the House Ways and Means Committee are far - reaching
and intrude in major ways into the conduct of local improvement
planning, service management, economic and redevelopment activities.
The House Ways and Means Committee scheduled to report out tax reform
legislation in early December. It is essential for cities to make
their opposition to these sweeping restrictions known to members of
Congress now. Illustrating the local impact of the proposed changes
in tax- exempt status of bonds will underline the seriousness of the
impact of these tax reform bond restrictions on city services,
development, and capital improvement programs.
5
..R
P-1
11 CITY OF
EDINA
EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
RF.gf)T.TTTTnW
EXHIBIT A
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it
hereby approves the Release of the following tract of land from the lien of
that certain Request to Transfer Assessments between Laukka, First Edina
National Bank and the City, dated May 8, 1979, filed July 20, 1979 as
Document No. 1339210:
Lots 1 -13, Block 1, Dewey Hill Fourth Addition, according to
the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the
Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are hereby authorized and
directed to execute the Release on behalf of the City of Edina.
ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1985.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 16, 1985, and
as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of December, 1985.
0 �(
City Clerk
RELEASE
THIS INDENTURE, made and entered into this .23rd day of
U,c(w,h..- , 1985, between the City of Edina ( "City "), by
and through its City Council, and Laukka and Associates, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation ( "Laukka "),
W I T N E S S E T H:
That City does, by and through resolution of its City Council
dated the 16th day of December, 1985, a certified copy of which
resolution is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
as Exhibit A, hereby forever release and discharge that certain tract
of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota,
described as follows, to -wit:
Lots 1 -13, Block 1, Dewey Hill Fourth Addition,
according to the plat thereof on file or of
record in the office of the Registrar of
Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota;
from the lien of that certain Request to Transfer Assessments
between Laukka, First Edina National Bank, a national banking
association, and City, dated May 8, 1979, filed July 20, 1979, as
Document No. 1339210 which Request to Transfer Assessments
provided for the City to transfer and apportion those certain
levied special assessments in Dewey Hill Second Addition
identified in Exhibit "B" attached hereto.
IN WTINESS WHEREOF, City has caused these presents to be
executed the day and year first above written and its seal to
be hereunto affixed.
CITY OF EDINA
By
4
Its >�
By
Its
D.
ART — ART BOARD N — MOLIDAT PS — PARK BOARD
BOA — BOARD OF APPEALS NPB — NERITAOE PRESERVATION BOARD PC — PLANNING COMMISSION
CC — C ITY OF
XRC — NUMAN RELATIONB COMMISSION RC — RECYCLING COMMISSION
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
SUN
MON
I TUE
I WED
THUR
I FRI
I SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
I MON
I TUE
I WED
I THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
I TUE
I WED
'2
ITHURT
FRI
SAT
1
X
2
BOA
3
4
I
I
1
PC
3
BOA
4
S
CC 8
1
7
PO 9
9
10
II
2
CC 3
4
5
BOA 6
7
9
2
3
C�
4
5
6
BOA
7
r_--a
ROLE
6
7
CC
8
P6
9
10
II
12
12
13
14
Pe
15
ART
16
BOA
RC
17
16
9
10
Pe 11
12
13
14
I
8-
--.,10
(SURVEY
F
11
Pe
1
13
14
(CC IS_
ROLE
lam/
13
14
IS
NRC
16
ART
17
BOA
0.0
IB
19
19
20
X
21
MR C
22
23
24
y
POAM
16
17
N
le
MRC
19
ART
BOA
RC
1
.�^
PL:�
CC
18
XqC
19
ART
20
BOA
1
2
20
21
CC
22
MPG
23
24
2y
26
26
x-27
cc
28
Nve
ve
0
31
23
24
ec
25
Xvs
2
Pc
27
28
30
24/31
25
NP
26
27
26
29
27
28
29
30
Rc
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
I MON
I TUE
I WED
I THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
I
BOA
I
2
CC
3
4
5
BOA
6
I
2
PC
3
BOA
4
N
y
i
I
2
4
CC y1
1.�..J
8
7 8
9
10
8
m1RVE9
(RESULT.I
PB 10
11
12
13
14
6
CC 7
Pill 8
9
10
—11-12
3
CC 4
I
5
6
7
BOA
8
9
II
12
BOARD
REVIEOF
13
Pe
14 15
BOA
RC
16
17
Is
16
CC
17
NRC
I6
ART
19
BOA
RC
20
I
13
—14
SERVICE
L
I5
Mile
16
ART
17
BOA
RC
Is
10
—11.
SERVICE/
LEVEL
�f,J
12
Pe
13
14
Is
16
18
19
CC
20
MRC
21 22
ART
I
1
26 29
PC
23
24
22
23
24
MPG
2!
26
27
28
20
21
CC
22
MPS
23
24
25
26
17
cc
C�
19
NRC
20
I ART
21
BOA
RC
22
23
25M
26
'27 I
NPB
30
31
29
30
27
211
29
30
PC
31
24/31
25
26
MPG
2-11
PC
26
29
30
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
SUN
MON I
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
FSAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
.THUR
FRI
SAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
FSAT
SUN
MON
TUE
WED
THUR
FRI
SAT
1
N
2
3
-
4
Boa
y
8
1
Pe
APP. OF
BUDGE
2
BOA
3
4
1
/ '�1
cc
2
vc 3
OA
s 4
5
6
7�
6C 0
LV�
Pe s
�0
17
ART
11
12
13
CC
9
w
n
2
CC 3
4
5
BOA 6
7
8
7
9
9
re
10
11
12
13
14'
I
15
CC
16
NRC
is
BOA
RC
19
20
12
13
14
PO
15
ART
16
BOA
RC
17
IB
9
10
II
M
12
13
14
15
14
�Iy
CC (
l CC
16
NRC
17
ART
Is
BOA
RC
19
20
21
x-._22
SERVICE
LEVEL
23
MPG
24
25
28
27
18
r X20
CC
21
"Re
22
23
24
25
16
7
CC
IB
NRC
19
ART
20
6RC
21
22
21
22
23
MPG
24
N
25
M
26
27
28
29
30
26
27
28
MPG
29
PC 29
30
31
23/30
24
2S
MPB
26
27
28
N
29
28
29
30
31
N
ART — ART BOARD N — MOLIDAT PS — PARK BOARD
BOA — BOARD OF APPEALS NPB — NERITAOE PRESERVATION BOARD PC — PLANNING COMMISSION
CC — C ITY OF
XRC — NUMAN RELATIONB COMMISSION RC — RECYCLING COMMISSION
TASKS
SERVICE LEVELS
- IDENTIFY SERVICES --
- PUBLIC OPINION SURVEY
- FORMAT DEVELOPMENT
AND APPROVAL
- CONDUCT SURVEY
- ANALYZE DATA & SUBMIT
TO COUNCIL
- POLICY DEVELOPMENT
- DEVELOP AND REVIEW ALTERNATIVES
- 1986 BUDGET
ROLE OF COUNCIL
- WORKSHOP
MANAGEMENT AUDIT
- APPOINT COMMITTEE
- ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING
- MID -POINT REVIEW
- FINAL REVIEW
1986 WORK PLAN
STAFF
COUNCIL ACTIONS
I� .n
t
i
YI
association of
meropoitan
municipalities
December 3, 1985
Dear AMM Member City Official:
Attached are recommended policy additions and changes for the
AMM 1986 Legislation package. Except where noted, all policy
adopted last year for the 1985 -1986 Legislative biennium is
still in affect for 1986 and actions this year are in addendum
to those of last year.
The policies are separated into five sections representing the
five standing committees. Each policy, following the title, has
an indication of New, Additional, Delete, Replacement or
Modification. New and Replacement are entirely new language.
Delete has a single cross out to show complete deletion of
existing language. Additional and Modification repeat existing
policy language with the use of underlining for added language
and dash marks over existing words which are to be deleted.
There will be a meeting of all AMM member cities to discuss and
vote on these recommended policies. The membership meeting will
be held Thursday evening, January 9, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. at the
Brooklyn Center Community Center in the Social Hall.
The AMM Revenue Committee is meeting weekly to study and develop
additional policy concerning Fiscal Disparities. Its action is
expected to culminate in early to mid December, at which time,
any policy recommendations will be forwarded to you.
We hope that you will examine these proposed policies carefully
and attend the membership meeting to provide your input in the
AMM policy process.
Respectfully,
AMM Board of Directors
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600
Y
I N D E X
PAGE NUMBER
I. MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION 1 - 2
II. GENERAL LEGISLATION
3 - 7
III. HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA 8 - 14
IV. METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES AND CONCERNS 15 - 18
V. TRANSPORTATION
19 - 20
. f
MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND
TAXATION
'• '
r' '' ' * r d ti..r � �L �'!
!
t . YAM
t
PAGES AND 2
a-
.1
t I
,
MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION
I -A -2 LEVY LIMIT INDEX (New Policy)
The 1985 Legislature reversed the annual levy limit base increase
index from the greater of the Implicit Price Deflator or 5% to
the lessor of these. For many years cities argued that the levy
base increase should not be a flat percentage but be indexed to
reflect cost of doing business. This is especially true since
labor costs are 60 to 65 percent of the total municipal cost, yet
because of the state PELRA laws control of wages and wage
increases often is determined by outside arbitration. Also,
during those years, of flat percent increase, many adjustments and
gimmicks we're needed to keep up but since the adoption of the
Implicit Price Deflator as an index, this has not been the case
and property tax increases have been reasonable.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE ANNUAL LEVY BASE
INCREASE TO THE IMPLICIT PRICE DEFLATOR OR 5% WHICHEVER IS
GREATER.
I -B -11 COMPARABLE WORTH AND FAIR LABOR STANDARDS LEVY BASE
ADJUSTMENT (New Policy)
Recent actions at the Federal and State levels concerning public
employee compensation is having a significant affect on the
ability of Minnesota cities to meet the increasing salary required
to maintain current staffing levels. Implementation of Comparable
Worth salary studies and compliance with the Fair Labor Standards
Act per the Garcia decision may cause city payrolls to increase
well above the percentage allowed by the restrictive 5% levy
limitation imposed upon cities over 5000 population. Most cities
budgets are 65% to 75% payroll related, therefore, labor related
mandated increases above normal inflation can not be accommodated
without service reductions in various sensitive public health and
safety areas.
THE AMM STRONGLY URGES,THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE LEVY BASE
INCREASES TO COMPENSATE FOR MANDATED IMPLEMENTATION OF
COMPARABLE WORTH AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.
I -B -12 INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT SPECIAL LEVY (New Policy)
The legislature has
in the past,
recognized the need for
establishing special
funds to ensure
that local government
infrastructure (roads,
bridges, etc.)
is
maintained in a safe and
usable manner by the
creation of a
Public
Works Reserve Fund,
Minnesota Statutes 471.57. However,
this
law was passed prior to
the enactment of the
very strict
levy
limitation law, Minn.
Statute 275.50 which negates
the ability
to create such a fund.
Many cities will soon
be faced with
the
need to replace existing
- 1 -
}
facilities such as streets. This is very costly and based on
recent trends may not be accomplishable under Minn. Statutes 429
which require at least a 20% assessment, since proving a benefit
for assessment purposes in the courts has become much more
difficult. Therefore,
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE CURRENT PUBLIC
WORKS RESERVE FUND TO BE A LEVY OUTSIDE OF THE 275.50 LEVY LIMITS
OR TO CREATE A NEW SPECIAL LEVY TO ESTABLISH AN INFRASTRUCTURE
REPLACEMENT RESERVE FUND.
I -C -2 LGA ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS (New Policy)
The 1985 legislature provided that a portion of the LGA fund be
paid to the State Auditor and State Demographer for activities
associated with local government. Although the amount of dollars
involved is small, this sets a precedent that could lead to large
allocations of aid funds in the future to fund normal state
government operations and could affect all units of local
government not just cities.
THE AMM OPPOSES FUNDING STATE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS FROM A PORTION
OF AID ALLOCATIONS AND .REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE LGA
FUND MONIES TAKEN FOR THE OPERATIONS OF THE STATE AUDITOR AND
STATE DEMOGRAPHER DEPARTMENTS.
I -F -4 TELEPHONE TAX FOR 911 (New Policy)
The 1985 legislature enacted a tax on all telephone service to pay
the state share of capital and trunk costs for the mandated 911
Emergency Telephone Service. As part of the 911 mandate, counties
and local units had to pay equipment costs, line costs, and on
going operating expenses from an already overburdened and limited
general property tax levy. Unlike the state, local units do not
have the authority to recover these ongoing costs. Therefore,
THE AMM REQUESTS THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE THE.911
TELEPHONE TAX TO PAY THE LOCAL SHARE FOR EQUIPMENT AND CONTINUING
LINE COST.
-2-
-S
r
GENERAL
LEGISLATION
a e ! 1
v
/hilt
•R
VY'T
e��+Z..�.'i
#m
PAGES
3 THROUGH 7
�4�YF�f..
st
r
i
II
GENERAL LEGISLATION
II -DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING (Additional Policy).
II -N -1 CONSISTENCY OF DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING LAWS.
Data privacy laws protect individuals from the release of
information to the public which the legislature has deemed to be
private or which could be unnecessarily harmful to the
individual. On the other hand, the open meeting law prohibits
local government units from holding closed sessions except when
discussing pending or actual law suits with anattorney or labor
negotiations., Unfortunately, many occasions have arisen in past
years where local units in dealing with individuals or employee
disciplinary matters have been forced to either violate the Data
Privacy Statutes or the Open Meeting Statute in order to fairly
resolve the issue.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE THE DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN
MEETING LAWS CONSISTENT SO THAT TO COMPLY WITH ONE LAW A CITY
SHOULD NOT HAVE TO VIOLATE THE OTHER.
THE AMM STRONGLY SUPPORTS LEGISLATION FAVORING DATA PRIVACY OVER
OPEN MEETING WHERE CONFLICTS ARISE TO PROTECT THE EMPLOYEES RIGH
OF CONFIDENTIALITY FOR PERSONAL AND PRIVATE DATA AS IS DONE IN
THE PRIVATE SECTOR AND SECURED BY FEDERAL LAW.
II -N -2 DISCOVERY PROCEDURES
Section_ ^1 30 of the Government Data Practices Act attempts to
maintain the confidentiality of data used by public attorneys in
preparation of litigation, subject to discovery procedures under
court rules. However, any data relating to litigation under the
control of the responsi -ble authority, other than the attorney, is
subject to the provisions of The Government Data Practices Act.
This provision allows an unfair advantage to persons suing
municipalities by allowing them to avoid normal notice to
municipal attorneys and- the use of discovery in preparing their
cases against the municipality.
THE AMM ADVOCATES AMENDING THE GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT SO
THAT LITIGANTS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO UTILIZE NORMAL DISCOVERY
PROCEEDINGS WHERE LITIGATION IS THREATENED OR PENDING AGAINST
MUNICIPALITIES, RATHER THAN ALLOWING ADVERSE PARTIES TO OBTAIN
DATA TO LITIGATE AGAINST MUNICIPALITIES BY USING THE GOVERNMENT
DATA PRACTICES ACT.
-3-
II -T PERA BENEFITS, FINANCING, AND ADMINISTRATION
T -15 DEFINED CONTRIBUTION (Kew S ubpolicy)
Defined contribution plans basically provide that an employee
receives that amount that the employee and employer have
contributed plus accrued interest at exit from public employment
or retirement. The amount can be taken in lump sum or used to
provide various annuity arrangements. It -provides complete
portability and certainty of ownership of the account which cannot
be modified• by legislative acts. It resolves intergeneration
fights and fights between current generation employees as well as
forever resolving underfunding questions and ends pressures for
political tinkering for various benefit modification.
THE AMM SUPPORTS IN CONCEPT A'CHANGE IN THE MEANS OF PROVIDING
PENSIONS FOR NEW MINNESOTA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FROM THE PRESENT
DEFINED BENEFIT TYPE PLANS TO A SINGLE DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN.
CURRENT EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE GIVEN THE OPTION TO TRANSFER INTO THE
NEW PLAN. HOWEVER, THE AMM WILL OPPOSE ANY SUCH LEGISLATION WHICH
DOES NOT CONTAIN A CLEAR COMMITMENT BY THE STATE TO FUND ANY
DEFICIT CREATED IN PRESENTLY EXISTING DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS
RESULTING FROM THE TERMINATION OF THE ENTRY OF NEW MEMBERS, AND A
MUNICIPAL CONTRIBUTION RATE THAT IS AS LOW OR LOWER THAN EMPLOYER
CONTRIBUTION RATES TO EXISTING PLANS.
II -U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS (delete for replacement)
ing the 1983 legislative session, Tort liability limits for
loc governments were increased from $100,000/$300,000 to
$200,0 $600,000 as of August 1, 1984. Limits for Hazardous
Waste di sal claims are $300,000/$600,000 and will be
$400,000/$1, 000 effective August 1, 1984. During these
discussions, the overnors office expressed a desire to remove
Tort liability li its altogether. If done, this could have a
critical and disastr effect on city financing and property
taxes. The cost of pr 'ding insurance for unlimited liability
would be prohibitive and ca a long term unnecessary major
property tax increase.. Also, 'f a major claim were to be filed
and supported through the judicial stem for a sum far in excess
of what might be considered reasonable, local jurisdiction could
literally be driven to financial ruin wi the taxpayers becoming
liable for huge property tax payments. Unl a private sector
business, a city cannot merely declare bankru y and cease to
THE AMM CONSIDERS THE CURRENT TORT LIABILITY LIMITS A S UATE TO
SATISFY ANY REASONABLE CLAIM AND THEREFORE URGES THE LEGI TORE
TO RETAIN THE LIMITS IN CURRENT LAW AND NOT CONSIDER UNLIM
LIABILITY.
-4-
II -U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS (Replacement Policy)
The Municipal Tort Liability Act was enacted to protect the public
treasury while giving the citizen relief from the arbitrary,
confusing, and administratively expensive prior doctrine of
sovereign immunity with its inconsistent and irrational
distinctions between governmental and proprietary activities. The
act has served that purpose well in the past, however, courts
frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to
citizens damaged by public servants as a result of enactment of.
the comprehensive act which includes some limitations on liability
and some qualifications of normal tort claims procedure.
The special vulnerability of far -flung government operations
to debilitating tort suits continues to require the existence of a
tort claims act applicable to local governments or local
governments and the state. The need for some type of limitations
is evidenced by recent experiences with the insurance market.
Cities in Minnesota are finding it increasingly difficult to
obtain insurance at an affordable rate, if at all. Amendments in
1983 to increase the dollar amounts recoverable by plaintiffs were
League supported and should be adequate to satisfy any reasonable
claim. Further changes in the law should not be made until the
Governor's Advisory Commission on State and Local Relations
( ACSLR) completes its study of the insurance and liability crisis
local and state governments face and makes recommendations: for
statutory changes to the legislature.
THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUED EXISTENCE OF THE MUNICIPAL TORT
LIABILITY ACT AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE LEGISLATURE REFRAIN FROM ANY
AMENDMENTS OF THE ACT UNTIL THE GOVERNOR'S ADVISORY COMMISSION ON
STATE AND LOCAL RELATIONS SUBMITS A RECOMMENDATION TO THE
LEGISLATURE. FURTHER THE ACSLR STUDY SHOULD EXAMINE THE MERITS OF
A UNIFORM TORT CLAIMS ACT APPLICABLE TO STATE AND LOCAL UNITS OF
GOVERNMENT EQUALLY AS WELL AS OTHER CHANGES SUCH AS LIMITING JOINT
AND SEVERAL LIABILITY.
II X PLUMBING INSPECTIONS .(New Policy)
Currently plumbing inspections are being handling as a routine
part of the overall inspections done through city Building
Inspection Programs. No special requirements exist other than
normal certification of the Building Inspector. Electrical
inspections are done by State Electrical Inspectors. In 1985 the
Senate passed and the House considered a bill to require plumbing
inspections be done by licensed plumbers Where this is currently
done, plumbing permit costs are significantly higher.
THE AMM OPPOSES MANDATING BY THE STATE THAT ALL PLUMBING
INSPECTIONS BE DONE BY LICENSED PLUMBERS AS UNNECESSARY AND OVERLY
EXPENSIVE. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT DEVELOPMENT OF AN APPROPRIATE
PLUMBING INSPECTION TEST AND CERTIFICATION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION FOR PLUMBERS AND /OR CURRENT BUILDING INSPECTORS IF
THERE IS PROVIDED ADEQUATE TIME AND EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY FOR
CURRENT INSPECTORS TO BECOME CERTIFIED.
II -Y LAND SALES BY COMPETITIVE BID (New Policy)
Legislation introduced in 1985 (HF 363, Zaffke, and SF 1289,
Olson) would require that any land sold by a city would have
to have three weeks published notice and sold at the most
favorable bid to the city. All bids could be rejected. The
bill did not consider development activities such as TIF,
HUD, etc.. or what happens if no bid is received. Nor did it
consider cases where small or unbuildable parcels exist that
should be handled through negotiated sales or trades with
neighboring property owners.
THE AMM OPPOSES IMPOSITION OF A MANDATED COMPETITIVE
BIDDING PROCESS FOR SALE OF LAND BY CITIES.
II -Z WINE IN GROCERY STORE (New Policy)
Sale of wine in grocery or fast food'stores would create many
problems of control for local units of government since
minors have a significantly higher employment. rate in these
establishments. A local option on sales is also unworkable,
particularly where cities share borders and are densely
located.
THE AMM OPPOSES PROVISION FOR THE OFF -SALE OF WINE IN
OTHER THAN LIQUOR STORES.
II— AA CHARITABLE GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT FEES (New Policy)
Since the establishment of the State Gambling Board and
liberalization of charitable gambling permitted within
various establishments, there has been a significant increase
in local enforcement needs and costs.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE CHARITABLE
GAMBLING STATUTE TO PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS WITH A SHARE OF
THE ANNUAL STATE PERMIT FEES AND A PORTION OF THE TAX
PROCEEDS FOR ENFORCEMENT PURPOSES.
II -BB. ASSESSMENT HEARING NOTICE. (New Policy)
The 1985 legislature passed a bill requiring the assessment
amount of a particular parcel to be included in the
individual notice of hearing to the parcel owner. The law,
also, may require each parcel and amount to be listed in the
general notice of assessment hearing published in the legal
newspaper. To publish each parcel and assessment amount in
the general notice is excessively costly and duplicative
since individual notices with individual assessment amounts
are sent.
THE AMM URGES THE
NOTICE STATUTE TO
CONTAIN ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT HEARIN
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
BE ASSESSED.
LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE ASSESSMENT
CLARIFY THAT ONLY INDIVIDUAL NOTICES
AMOUNT BY PARCEL AND THAT THE NOTICE OF
G IN THE LEGAL PUBLICATION CONTAIN THE
AREA DESCRIPTION AND OVERALL COST TO
III
HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA
HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION (Policy Modification)
Housing is a metropolitan problem of major proportions.
According to demographic data compiled by the Metropolitan
Council, there is an estimated need for about 120,000 new
housing units in the metropolitan area by 1995. A signif: znt
portion of these units (68,000) are needed for persons who
cannot afford market rate housing. . There are strong
indications that under existing conditions, the total need for
housing or the need of the lower income segment will not be
met. In addition, there is an equally important
problem of maintaining and re -using the existing
housing stock effectively. Otherwise, more new housing
will have to be produced to make up for unnecessary losses and
there will be an under utilization of public service
investments.
The Federal and State Governments appear to be reducing their
financial commitments to provide housing for low and moderate
income persons and this will intensify the housing shortage
problem for those unable.to purchase or rent at market rates.
It is also apparent that local units of government do not have
the financial capability to assume the shortfall in Federal and
State provided subsidies. The housing shortage problem for
persons unable to afford market rate housing can only be solved
if all levels of government and the private sector work
together and if -each contributes a fair share to the solution.
Each level of government should contribute its fair share to
help solve the problem and each level's contributions should be
of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and State
Levels should continue to provide most of the direct subsidies
for low and moderate income persons. The Federal and State
Governments also have -the responsibility to improve the overall
investment climate and to provide a tax climate in which the
private sector can produce rental units that are affordable to
low and moderate income households. The State should also
grant local units of-government the authority and flexibility
to conduct the kind of housing programs that best meets their
diverse needs.
The Metropolitan Council should continue to Place high
_priority pn .dawalop a "a,.isLic aomi6ra"nsi.6e housin,;
p annin;r� or the Metropolitan Area tie4 A= provide
specific guidance to the public and private sectors so that
both can make rational decisions relative to future
housing needs. The council should continue to be agressive
in seeking inovative ways to create housing o ortunities for
=ncome D ersons. a. a.a i e
ra.o s p.c& s i to it 1 i 44 a s-w&f alt tJ" "-wa-a t G" " i.& a, c o m*.ie x 60+ib iwag
die 1 i - a rat sacs t a r6.
Local units of Government also have a strong role to play.
Even though local land use controls constitute a small portion
of the total cost of housing, local units should not set
requirements which go beyond what is necessary for the
protection of health, safety and welfare. Local units should
also work with the private sector to make the best use of
existing. tools (revenue bonds, tax increment financing, etc.)
to produce housing which is more affordable.
Finally, decision makers at
become more cognizant of their
which have an indirect but sub
Such actions, policies,
themselves be worthwhile and
up the cost of housing.
all levels of government must
actions, policies, and decisions
stantial impact on housing costs.
and decisions may in
beneficial but which do drive
$ A&E D• QIi- 4F HO HO U CR I-1 G- PIR A$ L4* D£ F Ali I W QN , '&H FP 1444D6 AFB CQNM" DZ
III -A EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS
Local requirements constitute a very small portion of the total
cost of producing housing, but all participants in the housing
delivery system need to do their part. to hold costs down.
COMMUNITIES SHOULD EXAMINE THEIR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (LAND
USE REGULATIONS, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO SEE
IF THESE REQUIREMENTS GO BEYOND WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE
PROTECTION OF HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE, AND INHIBIT — THE CONSTRUCTION OF 'aAtIoe &&ELT" AFFORDABLE HOUSING.
MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE WHEN APPROPRIATE..
III-P9B PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS
Decision makers at various levels of government must become
more cognizant of actions they take which have an indirect but
substantial impact on housing costs. These actions in
themselves may be worthwhile and beneficial, but when
implemented result in increased housing costs. Examples of
this type of action would include such things as the sewer
availability charge, restricted growth policies, building and
energy codes, environmental rules, etc.
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND STATE AGENCIES SHOULD
EXAMINE THEIR PRACTICES AND POLICIES TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE
HIDDEN IMPACTS ON HOUSING COSTS OF SAID PRACTICES AND
POLICIES NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO HOUSING. CHANGES SHOULD BE
MADE AS NECESSARY.
III -E-C MANDATORY STANDARDS.AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING
Mandatory, uniform land use standards for housing style and
location would not be appropriate because of the great
diversity among cities and differences within cities relative
to state of development, topography, lot and dwelling sizes,
the mix of housing values and costs, and the level of municipal
services which are provided. Therefore, cities should retain
the authority to regulate land uses, including the
determination as to whether alternative housing, such as
manufactured and accessory housing can be located in areas
where other modes of housing have been established.
Land use regulation is one of the tools city officials need to
protect the health, safety, welfare, and interests of the
city's residents.
THE LEGISLATURE
MANDATORY ZONING AND
DDITIONAL LAND USE
GUVERNMENT. CITIES
THE LOCATION, SIZE
MANUFACTURED AND AC
HO&D. NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH SETS
SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES
REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNITS OF
SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE
AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING, INCLUDING
CESSORY HOUSING, WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES.
III ?'D FINANCING " D&RA-bM STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES
The wit y ..e r v.,&" s w&!.c h -adaa. p r a %, - o P" i d en" Ord primp a r�
Q;"a $ncLfianc" l"geQ,�w b#.-pr*"rt4g&..tax@ -da..not -Pe labe. toe
ab4 l i&* o fah
""pe#&�6y o++neva. Property ,taxes
provide the major revenue source for most cities and Pedoetiew
3a p"*e&LV tahmes.-baate. oAb. a6"i 6)b tom p** wed cawp-ouR6w 4*e
bcias"g +ro6.eme- ira® moot &itea in the Metro
and the Minnesota property Tax Svstem is one of the MAC*
complex systems. UnEgEtunatpl g- rat_hpr thin aJMR1 4
Legislature often times adds to the complexity of this system
By c ang ng a system E0 benefit certain persons as a means to
Implement or f1nance state or regional social gglILI, The AMM
believes at the property tax system is not the annr°nrJ &Jg__
mechanism to finance state or regional housing policies and
goals.
THE AMM OPPOSES THE USE OF THE 4,GG" PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM &KCWLr&
N" W - iiSiwD AS. TidE V M I E FINANCE OR IMPLEMENT %ED&Rkt-,
STATE OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES OR GOALS. STATE AND /OR
REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES AND GOALS S
.FINANCED BY ROR-PROPE TAX SOURCES7.
III -DE RENEWAL OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING
The Federal and State levels of government have a broader and
- i0-
more diverse tax base than local units of government and should
provide the necessary funding to fulfill their housing policy
commitments to lower income persons. This funding commitment
is needed to provide adequate housing for those persons unable
to afford market rate housing.
FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING FOR HOUSING SHOULD BE INCREASED.TO
IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING POLICIES OF THOSE LEVELS AND MATCH THE
NEEDS OF THOSE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTED HOUSING INCLUDING
ASSISTANCE FOR RENOVATING AND REHABILITATING SUBSTANDARD
HOUSING UNITS.
III -OF PROGRAM LATITUDE
There is a tendency on the part of the Legislature-when it
provides funding to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA)
or political subdivisions for housing programs to make sure it
is a safe investment. The AMM does not disagree with the need
to be prudent with public funding. However, the state
guidelines and regulations. sometimes are so stringent they
inhibit inovation'and render the programs inoperable. Also, at
times the rules and regulations for programs administered
locally, are more stringent and cumbersome than for similar
programs administered through the MHFA. There is a need for
creative and inovative programs to increase the production of
housing for low and moderate income persons.
THE LEGISLATURE WHEN PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF'
INOVATIVE AND CREATIVE PROGRAMS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HOUSING
FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS SHOULD PROVIDE ENOUGH
PROGRAM LATITUDE IN THE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SO THAT THE
PROGRAMS CAN BE TAILORED TO MEET THE NEEDS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS IN DIFFERING LOCALS. ALSO THE
STATE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MORE
STRINGENT FOR PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY LOCAL UNITS AS OPPOSED
TO PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED THROUGH STATE OR REGIONAL AGENCIES.
III-,G AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS
There is a great diversity among the cities in the metropolitan
area. Some cities need more housing for low and moderate
income persons while other cities need more housing for middle
and upper income persons. Cities should have the authority to
- - -- - promo- te-- wh- i- chever- k- i- nd- of-- hou-s-ing -is- within the public purpose
and best interest of the city to do so. It is also important
that state and federal agencies cooperate with cities in
developing workable programs to meet the diverse needs of
cities. Cities need to have more control over the cost of
housing being developed if they are to meet the intent of
the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. In a practical sense
-11-
r
t
municipalities, may be able to require reduced cost housing,
but it is preferable to < have this authority specified by
statute .specifically. Dedication would provide land, or cash
in lieu of land, for housing needs and is not intended to
be in addition to parks dedication but a substitute for it if
that would better enable the city to meet its overall needs.
CITIES SH�OUL�D BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY
BY THE LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT HOUSING PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE
DIFFERING NEEDS OF DIVERSE CITIES AND THAT ENABLE CITIES TO
COMPLY WITH THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT WHICH
DIRECTS CITIES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW AND MODERATE COST
HOUSING. CITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED, IF THEY DESIRE, TO
REQUIRE LOWER COSTS HOUSING IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND TO
REQUIRE THE DEDICATION OF LAND OR CASH FOR LOW AND MODERATE
INCOME HOUSING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIRED DEDICATION
FOR PARKS. ALSO, CITIES SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP
HOUSING FOR MIDDLE AND UPPER INCOME PERSONS IF THAT IS NEEDED
TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED HOUSING STOCK.CITIES SHOULD CONTINUE
TO HAVE AUTHORITY TO USE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING TO ACHIEVE
GALS FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING.
III -H METROPOLITAN HRA (New Policy)
Providing housing assistance
income persons is very important
Metropolitan HRA was establishe
in providing low income housing
the local jurisdictions at thei
for low income housing programs
eliminated entirely and it is
continue as an active viable
government.
and affordable housing to low
in the metropolitan area. The
J in 1974 to assist local units
and works in cooperation with
r invitation. Federal funding
is likely to decline or to be
important that the Metro HRA
partner with local units of
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT THE EXISTING METRO HRA STRUCTURE WHEREBY
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL- IS THE METROPOLITAN HRA AND IS
ASSISTED BY THE HRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS APPROPRIATE. WE ALSO
BELIEVE THAT THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY OF THE METRO HRA SHOULD
NOT BE INCREASED AS IT HAS SUFFICIENT TOOLS NOW TO MEET THE
NEEDS OF THIS AREA. THE AMM WOULD OPPOSE CHANGES TO THE METRO
HRA STRUCTURE WHICH WOULD RESULT IN AN INDEPENDENT OR
SEMI - INDEPENDENT AGENCY WITH ITS OWN STAFF SIMILAR TO THE MWCC
OR RTB.
III-*I RENTAL HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA (Modification)
Rental housing plays an important role in the Twin Cities
housing market. Approximately 35 per cent of the housing units
in the Twin Cities region are rental units. Traditionally,
-12-
i
l
rental units have provided an affordable housing option for
singles, young adults, young married, students, the elderly,
and low and moderate ._income households. In reality, rental
housing units serve a market much more diverse than that served
by owner occupied units. Yet over the past several years a
number of problems have developed in the rental market,
_.including:
1. Production of new rental units has declined drastically as
households are unable to afford the rents which must be
charged to cover costs and financing.
2. Many households which in the past would have moved from
rental to ownership status are unable to do so due to both
the increased cost of housing units. and high interest
rates.
3. The combination of few additions to the supply of rental
units,- increased competition for rental units, conversion
of rental units to condominiums, increased operating
costs, and general inflation has created a situation where
many rental units are not an affordable option for low and
moderate income households.
4. The supply of existing rental units, which is
predominately efficiency and one bedroom units, does not
adequately address the needs of families seeking rental
units.
Precisely because rental housing serves so many diverse types
of households and because the relative size of each category is
changing the solution to these problems must be multifaceted.
ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BECOME INVOLVED TO
SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESS THE PROBLE E RENTAL MARKET. IN
PARTICULAR, THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE CRUCIAL
ROLES IN IMPROVING THE OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE SO THAT
THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN PRODUCE BOTH RENTAL AND OWNER OCCUPIED
UNITS AND IN PROVIDING SUBSIDY FUNDS SO THAT LOW AND
MODERATE HOUSEHOLDS CAN AFFORD DECENT RENTAL UNITS. POSSIBLE
ACTIONS INCLUDE:
MODIFYING FEDERAL AND STATE TAX •POLICIES TO IMPROVE THE
OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE FOR THE PRODUCTION AND
MAINTENANCE OF RENTAL HOUSING.
CONTINUING AND INCREASING THE LEVEL OF FUNDING AIMED AT
GIVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ACCESS TO DECENT
HOUSING.
-13-
�r
r
CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH USE TAX EXEMPT BONDING TO CREATE
BELOW MARKET RATE FUNDS FOR BOTH RENTAL AND OWNER OCCUPIED
UNITS.
CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW REHABILITATION AND
WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS TO BE UTILIZED ON RENTAL UNITS.
GRANTING LOCAL UNITS MORE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE
CONVERSION OF RENTAL UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS.
-14-
IV
METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES AND CONCERNS
-C -2 METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS (delete
for replacement)
The ucture of Metropolitan Governance that has evolved over
the last years is basically satisfactory. The structure and
relationshi between the Metropolitan Council and the various
Metropolitan C issions and Agencies are not uniform and function
determines form. or structural changes are not needed but the
AMM does recommend wo minor but significant changes which
should help to promo more effective communication and
coordination of regional s ices.
THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE RE NAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE
METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMIS N SHOULD BE APPOINTED BY
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RATHER THAN T GOVERNOR.
THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE REQUIRE 0 REVIEW THE ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGETS OF THE RTB AND MWCC AND TO ROVIDE COMMENTS
WITH RESPECT TO THE RESPONSIVENESS OF THESE GETS TO THE
REGIONAL POLICY PLANS .ADOPTED BY THE COUN FOR THOSE
FUNCTIONS.
IV- C -2 METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE (Replacement Policy)
The Structure of Metropolitan Governance that has evolved in this
Metropolitan area since the late 1960's has served the area well.
The structure of the various Metropolitan Agencies and Commissions
(MAC, MWCC, RTB, MPOSC, etc. ) is not uniform nor is the
relationship between these agencies and the Metropolitan Council
uniform. Function has basically determined form and not form
determining function.
THE AMM DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE METROPOLITAN. AGENCIES SHOULD
NECESSARILY BE STRUCTURED UNIFORMALLY BUT THE AMM DOES BELIEVE.
THAT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD CONDUCT A STUDY OF THE STRUCTURE OF.
THE MAC AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO
DETERMINE IF STRUCTURAL CHANGES WOULD ENHANCE AND IMPROVE
REGIONAL PLANNING AND SERVICE DELIVERY.
IV -D -1 LEGISLATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY (Policy Modification)
The system of regional governance should be more accountable to
the Legislature. The Metropolitan Council is in reality only
accountable and responsive to the Governor who is elected on a
state -wide basis. The Council, in turn, appoints the members of
the RTB, MWCC and MPOSC. Consequently, these Agencies are further
removed from the Legislature in terms of accountability. History
has shown that by and large the Council and Regional Agencies
members are appointed, reappointed or removed mostly on the basis
-15-
of political party affiliation. In theory, the Council and
Commissions are also accountable to the Legislature, but the
Legislature in recent years has shown little inclination to
exercise its overview authority unless the Council or Agencies
request increased funding or new funding authority.
A) BUDGET AND REVENUE FORECASTING OVERSIGHT
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE THE COUNCIL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES
TO PREPARE LONG RANGE 8U -DGE* FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS, IN ADDITION TO
THE EXISTING REQUIREMENT OF ANNUAL OPERATING AND FIVE
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
WOULD ASSEMBLE AND INTEGRATE THE SEPARATE AGENCY Bi3-BM"
PROJECTIONS INTO A SINGLE BU-BGET- FINANCIAL DOCUMENT AND PREPARE
SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW DOCUMENTS SHOWING AGGREGATE RESULTS AND MAKE
A YEARLY REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE AND PUBLIC. THE COUNCIL WOULD
NOT BE GRANTED ANY APPROVAL AUTHORITY BEYOND WHAT IT NOW POSSESSES
B) POLICY AND PROGRAM OVERSIGHT
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND
REGIONAL AGENCIES TO MAKE A FORMAL REPORT AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH
LEGISLATIVE SESSION WHICH FOCUSES ON THE MAJOR PROGRAMS, PLANS,
ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF THE RESPECTIVE AGENCIES. THE REPORTS AS A
MINIMUM WOULD IDENTIFY AND COMMENT ON NEW PROGRAMS; MAJOR CHANGES
TO ON -GOING PROGRAMS; THE NEED FOR SAME; MAJOR PRIORITIES: MAJOR
ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE THE PREVIOUS REPORT; AND DISCUSS REASONS
FOR INCREASES IN USER FEES WHEN SUCH INCREASES EXCEED THE
INFLATION RATES. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD HOLD 'HEARINGS' ON SUCH
REPORTS AND ALLOW FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
C) LEGISLATIVE FOCUS
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ESTABLISH A CENTRAL POINT OF FOCUS WITHIN
THE LEGISLATIVE. STRUCTURE TO ENHANCE INCREASED ACCOUNTABILITY AND
OVERSIGHT. TH£r P- REFERIFEa MFrTH4D -WOULD-BE % EST*BLt&H aTA*SI"
6AMM14TS" I* BSTH -"U,%" W4i -IGN F$6Ug- 041 M &ZRO"LIZ,AN- AFF"RS AEID_
;BSWF— A#I)- CNG&R*6 GF ME-T-ROP%Il'*N OffEftNANCE-. THIS CENTRAL POINT
OF FOCUS COULD BE ACCOMPLISHED BY STANDING COMMITTEE IN BOTH
HOUSES WHICH DEAL EXCLUSIVELY WITH METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS OR BY
COMMISSION. IN EITHER CASE, ALL PROPOSED LEGI
THE AGENCIES OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE WOULD
COM14IT -TEAS. AT THIS CENTRAL POINT IN ADDITION
SUGGESTED IN IV -D -1.
-16-
BE REVIEWED -N "E."
TO THE NEW ACTIVITIES
IV- D -2 PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY (Additional Policy)
The Association also believes that the metropolitan agencies
should be more accountable to the residents served by such
agencies. Direct election of agency members might improve
accountability but it would probably result in a general purpose
metropolitan level of government which the AMM opposes. The AMM
believes that a revised appointment process is necessary to
enhance public accountability and responsiveness to the residents
and local officials in the metropolitan area.
A) THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD IMPROVE THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR
MEMBERS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE MWCC, RTB AND MPOSC.
THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS, AS A MINIMUM, SHOULD INCLUDE: A
REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIFIED FILING PERIOD FOR EACH VACANCY; A
REQUIREMENT FOR AN ADEQUATELY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING IN EACH
DISTRICT FOR WHICH AN APPOINTMENT IS TO BE MADE INCLUDING
CRITERIA FOR SELECTION, CANDIDATE NAMES AND QUALIFICATIONS; A
REQUIRMENT THAT ONLY PERSONS WHO HAVE FILED DURING THE FILING
PERIOD ARE ELIGIBLE FOR APPOINTMENT; AND A REQUIREMENT FOR
MEANINGFUL INVOLVEMENT BY LOCAL OFFICIALS AND LEGISLATORS FROM
THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE APPOINTMENT IS TO BE MADE. LOCAL
OFFICIALS SHOULD NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM SERVING ON THE
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL.
AUTHORITY OF THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE RTB AND THE MWCC FROM THE
GOVERNOR TO THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
IV- COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS (delete
Tb%.,replacement)
Regional, sta and federal governmental levels require a variety
of special -purp e and environmental reviews for propoesed
developemnt projects. Each of these reviews represents a response
to a perceived need or public concern. - Environmental reviews
can cause significant d which creates uncertainty and
sometimes higher costs to developer and ultimately the
consumer. The process of environm tal review can also be abused
frivolously.
Improvements have been made to simplify th state environmental
review process, administered by the Environmen Quality Board
(EQB). In 1976, the Environmental Assessment Works t (EAW) was
introduced. To aid in determining whether a proposed tion has
potential for significant environmental effects that would quire
-17-
r
f4
Ne thorough evaluation of an Environmental Impact Statement
(E In most cases, an EIS is not required, and the
en vir ental review process is complete when the EAW is cleared.
A more r ent change has shifted the responsibility for most RIS
preparatio to local units of government. We commend the
Legislature a the EQB for taking these positive steps to
simplify and st amline the environmental review process and
further believe tha pother step would be to incorporate more of
the environmental revi process into the local planning process.
Each metropolitan area munity must prepare a comprehensive
plan; the local plan is n excellent vehicle for such an
approach.
THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT OF ALLO G LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS
AND ORDINANCES WHICH CONTAIN ACCEPTABL NVIR0 A ELEMENTS TO
BE USED TO SATISFY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES RESSED IN THE EAW AND
EIS PROCESS. FURTHER, THE ENTIRE STATE'S EN ONMENTAL REGULATORY
SYSTEM SHOULD BE STREAMLINED IN SUCH A MA R TO ENABLE A
"ONE - STOP" PERMIT SYSTEM FOR ALL STATE PERMIT REQU MENTS.
IV -G ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS (Replacement Policy)
M.S. Chapter 116D sets forth the basic environmental review
procedure for this state. Since environmental reviews can cause
significant delay, create uncertainty for the developer,, and add
to project .costs ultimately , borne by the consumer, it is
important that the review procedure be simple and straightforward
and yet thorough enough to assure that all important issues and
concerns are addressed. Improvements have been made in recent
years by the Legislature and the Environmental Quality Board (EQB)
to streamline the process and make it more difficult to abuse the
process. We commend them for these positive improvements.
THE AMM BELIEVES THAT AN APPROPRIATE BALANCE HAS BEEN STRUCK
BETWEEN THE NEED TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT AND THE DESIRE TO
ENHANCE AND IMPROVE THE ECONOMIC CLIMATE WITH RESPECT TO
DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WITHIN THE STATES ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PROCEDURE (M.S. CHAPTER 116 D). NO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES SHOULD BE
MADE UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE TO DETERMINE IF
CHANGES ARE NEEDED.
i�
_,
�
' ,
s
V -P LARGE TRUCKS (NEW POLICY)
The trucking industry has recently proposed to the state
legislature allowing truck tractor and trailor combinations bf
UP to 110 feet on Minnesota State Highways. Due to offtracking
of rear wheels, acceleration distance needs, and time and
distance required for safe passing, current legal. lengths are
pushing the limit of safety. and physical ability of our
interstate and trunk highway systems. Longer tractor /trailor
combinations would only exacerbate these conditions beyond
tolerable limits. To upgrade the HiEhway System to accommodate
longer units would be very expensive reducing funding resources
-for other much needed critical projects. Once allowed on the
interstate and designated trunk route highways there would
undoubtedly by pressure to provide, access to various local
areas which would be prohibitive in .cost for local upgrading
and unacceptable for safety, Therefore,
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO NOT INCREASE TRUCK TRACTOR AND
TRAILOR COMBINATION LENGTH LIMITS BEYOND CURRENT LIMITS DUE TO
UNACCEPTABLE COST FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION AND FOR P-ROTEC.ION
OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
V -Q MANDATORY SEAT BELTS (NEW POLICY)
Sufficient data exists to prove that wearing of seat belts
Would reduce traffic deaths considerably. • Although many view
this issue a3 'a personal decision that should not be mandated,
there is a significant public as well as personal cost in the
area of insurance and public safety and public .health needs.
Therefore;
THE AMM SUPPORTS MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS FOR WEARING OF SEAT
BELTS TO REDUCE TRAFFIC DEATHS AND RELATED PUBLIC COSTS.
V -R .HSA FUNDS FOR OPTICOM (NEW POLICY)
Optical Command System, Opticom, equipment is used by Public
Safety vehicles to change traffic signals-from the vehicle
while on an emergency .call. Opticom has proven successful in
decreasing emergency vehicle intersection accidents and is in
use in several metropolitan cities. However, it is expensive.
Current MSA standards and regulations do not allow use of MSA
funds for purchase of Opticom.
THE AMM REQUESTS THE MSA SCREENING COMMITTEE TO ALLOW USE OF
MSA HIGHWAY FUNDS FOR PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF OPTICOM
SYSTEMS FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTS ON MSA STREETS.
-20-
t
V
TRANSPORTATION
V -N MTC MEMBERSHIP (NEW POLICY)
The 1.984 legislature created the Regional Transit Board, as a
replacement for the then MTC which dealt with more than
operations of the major public bus company, to separate transit
alternative planning from bus company operations. In doing so
the MTC was reduced from 8 members to 3 members, one each from
Minneapolis, St. Paul, and the Suburbs. This arrangement has
worked, but not as well as it could and it is not
representative of the transit area population.
THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO INCREASE MTC MEMBERSHIP
TO FIVE BY ADDING TWO MORE SUBURBAN MEMBERS TO FACILITATE
OPERATIONS AS A BOARD AND TO MORE EQUITABLY REPRESENT THE
TRANSIT SERVICE AREA POPULATION.
V -0 FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS (NEW POLICY)
The Federal Government has mandated that states.move to a 21
year old age limit for legal purchase and consumption of
alcoholic beverages by late 1986 or loose federal
transportation funds. The AMM.is concerned about using federal
dollars as a type of blackmail or threat to accomplish
nationally what should be 'state rights' decisions but will
address that issue in another forum. The issue of what should
be the legal drinking age is also of concern to many AMM
members but is an issue more appropriately dealt with
individually. However, the AMM cities are very concerned with
any loss of federal - dollars for much needed transportation
programs in the Metropolitan area. Therefore:
THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ACT AS APPROPRIATE AND
NECESSARY TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED FLOW OF FEDERAL
TRANSPORTATION FUNDS TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
-19-
December 3, 1985
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
Dear AMM Member City Official:
Subject: Proposed Amendments to AMM By -Laws.
Attached are several proposed amendments to the AMM By -Laws
which are being sent to you for your review and consideration.
The majority of these amendments were proposed by a Special
By -Laws Committee which was appointed by the Board of Directors
in June. When reviewing the proposed amendments developed by
the committee, the Board decided to propose several additional
"housekeeping type" of amendments to improve clarity and to
eliminate redundant wording. Members of the By -Laws Committee
were Pat Hoyt Neils, Plymouth Councilmember, who served as
Chairperson and Bea Blomquist, Eagan Mayor, Jan Haugen,
Shorewood Councilmember, Jim Lacina, W000dbury Administrator;
Don Pauley, Mounds View Administrator, Neil Peterson,
Bloomington Councilmember; Dennis Schneider, Fridley,
Councilmember; Maureen Warren, St. Paul, Mayor's Office.
The Committee and Board, in addition to the housekeeping
amendments, are recommending that the AMM's fiscal year be
changed from a June through May time period to a calendar year
basis; reduce the maximum number from two to one of
representatives from a single city allowed on the Executive
Committee and reduce the maximum number from three to two of
the representatives from a single class of cities allowed on
the Executive Committee. The key to understanding the proposed
amendments is: new wording is underlined and wording being
deleted is -e"ssed otrt.
We hope that you will examine the
and attend the membership meeting
January 9, 1986 at 7:30 P.M. in
Center Social Hall to consider
By -Laws can only be amended by a
membership meeting attended by a
active AMM member cities.
Respectfully,
proposed amendments carefully
which will be held Thursday,
the Brooklyn Center Community
these proposed amendments. The
two- thirds majority vote at a
t least 30 percent of the
AMM By -Laws Committee and Board of Directors
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600
r
BY LAWS
OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
Adopted: June 6, 1974
First Revision: May 19, 1976
Second.Re- vision: January 5, 1978
Third Revision: May 24, 1979
Fourth Revision: May 28, 1981
Fifth Revision: December 30, 1981
Sixth Revision: May 26, 1983
-1-
0
s`
BY LAWS
b.
OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
ARTICLE.1.
NAME
SECTION 1.
The name of the organization shall be the:
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
SECTION 2.
The prinicipal office of the organization shall be at a
place in the Twin Cities' metropolitan area, as designated
by the Board of Directors. The organization may have such
other offices and may from time to time be designated by
the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
SECTION 1.
The term "Association" shall mean the "Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities"
SECTION 2.
The term "municipality" shall mean "city, village,
borough, or town ".
SECTION 3.
The term "Board" shall mean the "Board of Directors" of
the Association.
SECTION 4.
The term "active member" shall mean anv municipality whose
sites are current.
iA
ARTICLE III.
PURPOSES
The purposes of this organization shall be:
1. To effectively express in a united voice, policies
concerning the structure, powers and other matters relating
to municipal government for the municipalities in the
metropolitan area.
2. To serve as a forum through which all municipalities or
groups of municipalities may develop and propose policies
and position on matters of concern to the metropolitan
municipalities and develop strategies for advocating those
policies and positions.
3. To serve as a forum for the interchange of ideas and
information among municipalities in the metropolitan area
and to foster intermunicipal cooperation.
4. To develop and provide, either alone or in concert with the
League of Minnesota Cities or other organizations or
agencies, programs of technical assistance to member
municipalities.
5. To foster, generate and promote information and data
concerning the problems and issues affecting municipal
government in the metropolitan area to the state
legislature, in particular, and to the public at large.
6. To encourage the - improvement of municipal government in the
metropolitan area by holding conferences and by fostering
pertinent research projects.
7. To work closely with the League of Minnesota cities in the
interests of'members of this Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities.
8. To strive to make the metropolitan area and its component
municipalities more efficient and progressive in the
continuing task of making the quality of life as complete,
satisfying and enriching as possible for all citizens.
-I-
ARTICLE IV.
MEMBERSHIP ELIGIBILITY
SECTION 1. ACTIVE.
Any municipality within the jurisdiction of the
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities.' area is eligible
for active membership in the Association.
SECTION 2. ASSOCIATE MEMBERS.
Any public official, upon application, approved by the
Board of Directors, and upon payment of nominal dues, the
amount of which is to be determined by the Board, -e f-
4i-r,eet<o-re-; may become an associate Member. An Associate
Member shall- have the privilege of full participation in
Association activities, but shall not have the right to
vote at membership meetings or the right to membership upon
the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE V.
DUES AND ASSESSMENTS
SECTION 1. SCHEDULE.
The annual active membership dues schedule shall be fixed
by the Board e¢ B- ireet-ers and shall be coordinated with the
annual dues to the League of Minnesota Cities, and the
schedule may provide for a minimum charge for each member.
The total dues for each member shall be rounded to the
nearest dollar. The dues shall be fixed by the Board of
4i-reE-6ep-s- in amounts which, together with other income and
surplus funds, if any, are sufficient to finance th3 budget
adopted by the Board. A. change in dues schedule shall be
made no later than d-Lznt august 1 of the year !-& wAe4l-- i-t�- 1-9
to-bVUaMe prior to the effective chance
SECTION 2. FAILURE TO PAY DUES.
Dues shall be payable annually and will be billed to
member cities in .1:"e- January . Any member which has failed
to pay its dues by the first of Fe�brruer3r May following the
due date shall be stricken from the membership roll.
Reinstatement shall be upon such terms and conditions as
prescribed by the Board.e B�ea�a��. Any member may
withdraw from, the organization upon payment of all dues to
date and by notifying the Executive Director of the
Association in writing.
SECTION 3. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS.
Special assessments may be charged to a member municipality
i
or group of member municipalities for services received
above and beyond normal membership services. Agreements to
provide the service- shall require the approval of the
Board af- &i-Pe-ate-P&-'and shall be administered by the
Executive Director.
SECTION 4. DUES APPROVAL.
Any dues increase which would exceed the cost of living
increase for the Minneapolis -St. Paul area as measured by
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the proceding calendar
year would require approval by the member municipalities.
Such approval action would be conducted in the same manner
as specified for amending these by -laws in Article XII,
Section 1.
ARTICLE VI.
FISCAL REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 1. BUDGET
The Annual Budget shall be adopted by the Board e-
4)k&eetecza k:- 4a -y- by August 1 immediately preceding the
fiscal year for which the budget is applicable.
SECTION 2. FISCAL YEAR.
The fiscal year of the Association shall be
4u"e January 1 through te• Ha-r- December 31.
SECTION 3. AUDITS.
The accounts and finances of the Association shall be
post- audited annually.
ARTICLE VII.
OFFICERS
SECTION 1. OFFICERS
The officers of the Association shall be President, Vice
President, 16 Directors and the immediate Past President,
all of who shall together constitute the Board. of
t-e mss.
-5-
r�
SECTION 2. OFFICERS` TERMS.
Officers shall be elected at the Annual Meeting of the
Association and they shall take office June 1 following
the Annual Meeting. The President and Vice - President shall
each be elected annually for one -year terms, and the
Directors shall be elected for two -year overlapping terms.
Eight Directors elected in even numbered years and eight
Directors elected in odd numbered years. The same person
may not be elected to the office of President for more than
two successive terms. The same person shall not be elected
to the Board of Ri•rLe4c-�6o -r - for more than two consecutive two
year terms or serve more than five years if first
appointed by the Board or elected at the Annual Meeting to
fill a vacancy, unless elected to the presidency or
vice - presidency. Except for cities of over 75,000
population, when a director or officer leaves the Board e€6
Si- ree•tror-s— for any reason, primary consideration for
replacement will be given to member cities who have not
been represented on the Board during the past 12 months.
SECTION 3. ELIGIBILITY
To be eligible to be elected and to serve or to continue to
serve as an elective officer of the Association, a person
shall be an elected official or full time employee of a
member municipality. Any vacancy in an elective office
shall be filled for the remainder of the term by the Board' .
-of except that a vacancy . in the office of the
President shall be filled for the remainder of the term by.
the succession of the Vice President, and except that a
vacancy in the office of director occurring within 60 days
prior to-&n -the Annual Meeting and which term has more than
one year remaining shall be filled by election at the
Annual Meeting for the remainder of the term. The
provisions of this-section shall not apply to the office of
the immediate past president.
Any member of the Board -&-F D+re-e-te -rs- who is .absent for
three consecutive meetings or who is absent for any four
regular meetings er a yeer` during any
consecutive 12 month period commencing June 1 shall be
deemed to have resigned from the Board, and the vacancy
filled as provided in this section. APy uaaa -new ecou-pr_j_ng,
a s a- of: t h3 s a t-t e-m d-e ne, rte e d d-
by- anQtl er- afr_ie-iai a€- t4ia- same -ei-t�
1 �, , "
SECTION 4. PRESIDENT.
The President shall be Chairperson of the Board s
D- ieatars and the Executive Committee. The President shall
preside at all general membership meetings and all other
meetings of the Association, however, the President may
designate an alternate to preside at any such meetings.
The President shall appoint all committees established by
the Board e-F fir- ctoiy or the By -Laws, subject to
confirmation by the Board. of i34--fbe-&_t -&re -v
SECTION 5. VICE PRESIDENT.
In the absence of the President, the Vice President shall
act as President.
SECTION 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR.
The Executive Director shall be the chief administrative
officer of the Association, subject to the general
supervision of the Board. of �Di- r-ee-teas -. The Executive
Director shall have the following duties for the
Association: appoint employees and administer the office;
prepare an annual budget of revenues and expenditures for
the consideration of the Board-" Mrr&cto" and shall limit
expenditures to the total budget approved by the Board— e+
4i- Peet- er&e -; submit to the Board. ®€ &i- re-etre" and Ithe
membership an annual report of affairs, services and
finances; have charge of the records, accounts and
property; cause an official record of all meetings to be
made; and act as Treasurer and handle all funds. The
Executive Director and employees so designated by the
Executive Director shall post a corporate surety bond at
the Association expense. During state legislative sessions
the Executive Director shall institute a system whereby
member municipalities are alerted to introduced bills which
affect municipalities and shall to the greatest extent
possible relate the potential impact the bills could have
on municipalities.
-7-
ARTICLE VIII.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SECTION 1.
The Board ef- D4rec-toja-s shall consist of all officers of the
Association. All classes of cities of the Association
membership shall be represented on the Board. af- &ir9et-t- ra.
Two directors shall be elected or appointed from each city
of the first class, from the nominations submitted by the
respective cities, and no more than one director shall be
elected or appointed from a single city of any other class.
The Board shall be responsible for the general management
of the affairs of the Association, subject to the
provisions of these By -Laws. The Board shall supervise the
administration of the office of the Association by the
Executive Director of the Association. It shall establish
the positions and fix the rates of pay for employees of
the Association. It may adopt such rules and regulations
for the conduct of its business as shall be deemed
advisable and may, in the execution of the powers granted,
appoint such agents as it may consider necessary.
SECTION 2.
The Board af- D- iv- eQ-tar&_ shall hold regular meetings at such
times as may be determined by the Board. Special meetings
may be called by the President or by any three members upon
at least three days written notice to the Board members.
SECTION 3.
A quorum of the Board shall be ten members, including
officers, and action by'it shall require the favorable vote
of a majority but not less than eight members.
ARTICLE IX.
COMMITTEES
SECTION 1.
The President, subject to the approval of the Board, a
4i-Peo -t"s -j shall annually appoint such standing, special,
or subcommittees as may be required by the By -Laws, or as
may be found necessary by the President.
SECTION 2. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
There shall be elected annually by the Board &f- D- itee+el -s
four members thereof, who, with the President, Vice
President, and Past President, shall constitute an
Executive Committee. They may exercise the powers of the
Board ef- &ine o-t&r$ as delegated by the Board when the Board
e �i%-ee-tars- is not in session, reporting to the Board ef-
D4 eo4o-ps -at its succeeding meeting any action taken. Five
members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
business. Representation on the Executive Committee shall
be from all classes of cities, with no more than +.*&
one members- from any single city and no more than +Iree-
two members from any single class of cities excluding
the past President . Meetings may be called by the
Chairman or by two of its members.
SECTION 3. NOMINATING COMMITTEE.
Not less than 60 days before the Annual Meeting of the
Association, the President, with the approval of the Board,
e Wii-ee4oi&&, shall appoint a Nominating Committee of not
less than five members. In making appointments to the
Nominating Committee, the President shall make the
committee representative of the entire metropolitan area
with regard to both geographic area and population of the
members. Members of the Board of- D4PQ 4a-& may serve on
the Nominating Committee. The committee shall nominate, in
writing, candidates for election to the Board &F -E�i-i- eetrers
and their recommendation shall be mailed with the notice
of the annual meeting. In making nominations, the
committee shall attempt to make the nominated slate
representative of the entire metropolitan area with regard
to geographic area and population of the members. At the
Annual Meeting, additional candidates may be nominated by
any member.
ARTICLE X.
MEETINGS
SECTION 1.
The Association of- 9"repe4i-tan H- un+c+pa +itres shall hold
an Annual Meeting in May as the Board may direct, At -I-enst
and may hold.t4i -ree other regular or special meetings as may
be called by the Board.e-f- D+r%ectora. All annual and other
regular meetings of the Association shall b'e held at a
location within the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Notice
of all meetings shall be mailed to the administrative
officer of each member municipality at least 10 days prior
thereto. A quorum for any meeting is 20 percent of the
psf4- active members, except that at a meeting at which the
By -Laws are to be amended 30 percent of the Va4d- active
members shall constitute a quorum. Each municipality shall
designate a delegate and such alternates as it desires to
represent it at all Association meetings and so notify the
Association Executive Director in writing. In case of a
dispute within a delegation as to its representation, the
municipality involved shall determine its representative
through its own procedures. Except on matters of
legislation, each municipality represented at a meeting of
the Association shall be entitled to one vote, which shall
b -e _ the- major -ity - expre -ssion of delegat-e-s -from -t- hat - --
municipality.
Action on legislative matters and on amending the By -Laws
shall conform to the voting requirements set forth in
Article XI on legislative procedure and Article XII on
amendments to the By -Laws, respectively otherwise
parliamentary procedure shall be according to Robert's Rule
of Order.
SECTION 2.
The President, upon receipt of a written request signed by
officials of at least 20 percent of the member
municipalities, shall call a special membership meeting.
The special meeting shall be held within twenty days
following receipt of the request by the President. All
matters as to meeting procedure and notice shall be as
specified in Section 1 of this Article.
-10-
4{ 1 r
ARTICLE XI.
LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE
SECTION 1.
Except as otherwise provided in this Article, no official
commitment shall be made by the Association on any
proposed legislative matter unless it is approved by the
Board ef- Bipee-to-re- and is further approved by a two- thirds
favorable vote of the delegates present and voting at the
annual, regular or special meeting.
SECTION 2. VOTING.
The vote on any legislative matter shall be by acclamation;
but at any time before the result of the vote is announced
the chairman may, and shall, if requeseted to do so by five
or more delegates present, submit the question under
considertion to a vote by municipality, in which case each
municipality shall be entitled to one vote plus one
additional vote for each 50,000 population or major
fraction thereof of the municipality above the initial
50,000 population, according to the most recent population
estimate of the Metropolitan Council except when there is a
more recent official census. Voting by proxy is not
permitted, nor may any delegate cast more than one vote.
SECTION 3.
In lieu of approval at a meeting, an official commitment
may be made by mail ballot on any subject of legislation
when authoirized by the Board ef—D+rec+o-r&. No commitments
shall be made by mail ballot unless ballots are cast on the
question by at least 20 percent of member municipalities
through their legislative bodies and at ,.least two - thirds of
the municipalities voting approve the commitment. At least
ten days shall elapse between the mailing of the blank
ballots and the counting of the marked ballots.
- 11 -
}
SECTION u.
Subjects of legislation shall be initiated either by the
Board, e€ -Pi-re -coo", by the Council of any member
municipality, or by group of member municipalities, or by
the delegates at an annual, regular or special meeting.
Each subject thus initiated shall, if possible and as
directed by the Board e€- Direes -, be referred to a study
committee with staff support. The recommendation of the
study committee ,shall be considered by the Board of
Hi-recto" before reference to the delegates for final
action or before mail ballot is taken.
SECTION 5.
During a legislative session, the Board e € - D3reic+ers or
Executive Committee, whichever urgency requires, may, by a
two- thirds vote of its members, make a commitment on any
bill then pending when the bill is of sufficient general
municipal importance and urgency to require such action. A
commitment adopted under this section shall be presented to
the legislature as an Association Board or Executive
Committee commitment and not an official commitment of the
Association.
ARTICLE XII.
AMENDMENTS TO BY -LAWS
SECTION 1.
These By -Laws may be amended, repealed or altered, in whole
or in part, at an annual, regular or special meeting by a
two thirds vote of all municipalities voting, provided that
the amendments have been mailed out to members at least
seven days prior to the meeting and provided further that
the amendments are.not. contradictory with the Constitution
of the League of Minnesota Cities.
-12-
ARTICLE XIII.
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS
SECTION 1.
The Board af- may, on written application and
subject to ratification at the next following meeting,
recognize as affiliates of the Association a P4etro-po-1 -it-ern
Hutt-ic4p$13ties organizations whose membership consists
predominately of metropolitan area municipal officials or
employees. The general purpose of such affiliations shall
be to encourage maximum cooperation through the Association
between the various municipal functions, between
administrative departments and councils and between
municipalities throughout the area. The Board may require
for affiliate recognition such conditions as to activities,
membership, and finances as it deems appropriate. The
written request for affiliation should include a letter
signed by the presiding officer which requests
affiliation, a copy of the By -Laws, a membership list, a
list of officers and directors, a description of activities
and a copy of the current budget and financial statement.
In no event shall recognized affiliates advocate
legislative or other policies as Association e€
P4erep�1- tin— Nan- o- pal�tiesl proposals or policies, or
mention their affiliation with the Association unless such
proposals or policies have been approved through the
procedure provided in Article XI.
ARTICLE XIV
DISSOLUTION
SECTION 1.
The Association shall use its funds only to accomplish the
purposes and objectives specified in these By -Laws, and no
part of funds shall inure, or be distributed, to the
members of the Association except upon dissolution. On
dissolution of the Association, any funds remaining shall
be distributed t o ana -op- moxr& -p s-g w.l a-r�y- a r$aa.i.z a 3. a�"
q.ua 14 f-i o-d -m u-w i.Q i+.a -I- -0 r- $ oa e-P n me p-t -a sa oe i-a t 4-0-A-, -4 e- -4 e-
$e feat$ d�y�- .t,��3oa- rd- o.f�li- �ee.ters. the active members on a
pro rata basis.
" "'win cro-f`
I.
II.
III.
IV.
J V-'F
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL MEETING
Tuesday, December 17, 1985
Council Chambers
4:00 P.M.
TENTATIVE
AGENDA
Call to Order
Approval of Agenda
Minutes: None
Business
A. Report of the Metropolitan Significance Review Committee on the
Mall of America and Fantasyworld
Wo Nunn, Chair)
1. Recommendations on the Mall of America and Fantasyworld
Development in Bloomington, Referral 13053 -2
V. Other Business
VI. Reports
A. Chair
B. Council Members
VII. Adjournment
Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 (612)291 -6359 TOD 291 -0904
'r
Metropolitan Council Meeting of Dec. 17, 1985 Business Item: IV.A.1
pll
M E T R 0 P.0 L I T A N C O U N C I L
Suite 300 Metro Square .Build.ing, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
612- 291 -6359
REPORT OF THE
METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE
REFERRAL REPORT NO. 85 -123
DATE: December 11, 1985
TO: Metropolitan Council
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Significance Review
Mall of America and Fantasyworld
Metropolitan Council Referral No. 13053 -2
BACKGROUND
At its meeting on Dec. 9, 1985, the Metropolitan Significance Review Committee
discussed its proposed report and two alternative recommendations dealing with
the review of Mall of America and Fantasyworld. The committee report was based
on the staff report prepared under the direction of the Metropolitan Council
chair and released Nov: 8, 1985 and on the testimony and evidence presented -•
by the parties to the review during the public hearings which was conducted by
the committee on Nov. 20, 21 and 26, 1985.
ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Pat Pahl, Council staff (ext.,407), responded to questions raised by the
committee. Karen Schaffer, staff counsel (ext. 438), made a presentation to
the committee on the authority of the Council under the metropolitan
significance rules and under the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. She noted
that conditions contained in a suspension order must be directed at the
developer of the project and not at the city or state legislature. She also
stated that the Council can require the city to scale back the project if
necessary to make it compatible with metropolitan system plans and that the
effective tools to ensure that the city complied with the plan amendment
process included the authority of the Council to restrict the issuance of sewer
permits for any project in conflict with any of the four metropolitan systems
and the ability of the Council to veto improvements on controlled access
highways. In addition, the Metropolitan Land Planning Act provides that fiscal
controls adopted by local units of government must not be in conflict with
metropolitan system plans; the act defines fiscal controls as including tax
increment plans such as that proposed by the city of Bloomington for the
project.
-2-
OTHER ISSUES /COMMENTS
The committee allowed a representative of each of the parties - -the city of
Bloomington, Triple Five Corp. and the city of Minneapolis - -to make a final
presentation. John Pidgeon, Bloomington city manager, stated that the second
alternative, which recommended an indefinite suspension of the project, would
kill the development because the city would be unable to sell tax increment
bonds prior to the end of the year. New rules pending in Congress would
prevent the sale of bonds after Jan. 1, 1986. He proposed that the committee
adopt alternative one which recommended the use of the plan amendment process
to modify the project if necessary. He objected, however, to the elements of
alternative one that recommended a study of the 1 -494 corridor, no exemption
from fiscal disparities and one convention center to be located in downtown
Minneapolis.
Pidgeon stated that he had been in contact with Bloomington's`Mayor James
Lindau who was willing to delete the convention center from the proposed
development and reduce the proposed office space by 50 percent, from two
million square feet to one million square feet. In addition, the reduced
office space would not be constructed until 1996.
Robert Hoffman spoke for the Triple Five Corp. and confirmed that the
convention center would be deleted from the development but stated that he
could not comment on the other changes Pidgeon announced. He also stated that
the second alternative would kill the project. He supported alternative one
with findings and recommendations limited solely to effect on the metropolitan
system. He-noted that--Bloomington had re- lied -on Council traffic forecasts-- from -
the Transportation Policy Plan that are now found to be too low, an error on
the Council's part, and questioned why the Council was limiting development on
1 -494 which has capacity when it continued to approve incremental development
on 35 -W which is over capacity. Hoffman distributed a graphic that illustrated
the capacity on 1 -494 as compared to 35 -W. Hoffman asked the committee to
reconsider its finding that no market study had been done on the convention
center and on the retail and amusement elements of the mall. He contended that
the city had, in fact, done a detailed convention center study, and that for
the retail and amusement elements of the project, Triple Five had submitted as
much information as a market study would contain although not in the format of
a market study.
William Keppel spoke for the city of Minneapolis and said the city was pleased
with the deletion of the convention center. The city of Minneapolis had no
further comments.
Following are major points of concern raised by the committee:
Prior to discussing the findings in the report, several committee members made
statements to the committee. Campbell stated that, while she had seen more
desirable projects, some things were within the purview of local government and
others within regional purview. She found the Bloomington statement at the
Dec. 5 public meeting on the draft Metropolitan Development and Investment
-3-
Framework irresponsible. She was pleased with the Bloomington decision to
withdraw its proposed convention center and stated that, at the appropriate
time, she would move alternative one with changes because the Metropolitan Land
Planning Act process is stronger than the power of suspension under the
metropolitan significance rules.
Rosemary Thorsen expressed concern with some findings and stated that she was
not as convinced that suspension would be a mistake because of the potential
loss of funding. If the project is bad,, haste is a mistake. Valid concerns
should be responded to.
Gerald Stelzel stated that he supported alternative one with perhaps some
deletions based on the change in the convention center. Chair Josephine Nunn
stated that she did not see much to gain by suspension and believed that local
units of government have the right to make their own mistakes.
In reviewing the findings, Gertrude Ulrich objected to the Immediate area
transportation finding because they did not reflect the great amount of work
done by the city and other agencies to prepare a transportation plan for
Airport south. She moved to add an additional finding recognizing the work of
the transportation technical team and the mega -mall task force of the .
Transportation Advisory Committee. The motion was seconded by Campbell and
passed unanimously.
With regard to the 1 -494 corridor, Ulrich moved to delete four findings which
she stated were more appropriate as subjects of the recommended corridor study
and not as findings in the committee report. There was no second for the
motion. The eight transportation findings under the heading of 1 -494 corridor
were adopted unanimously with Ulrich requesting that her opposition to the four
findings be recorded.
Thorsen moved and Campbell seconded the findings under Travel Demand. Ulrich
commented that it appeared strange to recommend a study when the findings
already have been made. She stated that 1 and 2 should be included in the
study and not in the findings. Stelzel stated that they should be elements of
the study even though they are findings in the report. The Travel Demand
findings were adopted unanimously.
Thorsen moved and Stelzel seconded the Airport findings which were adopted
unanimously. The Parks findings were also moved by Thorsen and seconded by
Stelzel. Ulrich stated that she hoped that the Council staff was correct that
the mall project would increase the use of the regional recreation system
because it would help make the case.for regional parks before the legislature,
and that increased use of the park system should be viewed as a beneficial
effect of the proposed development. The Park findings were adopted
unanimously.
The Development Framework findings were moved by Thorsen and seconded by
Campbell. They were adopted unanimously following a comment from Ulrich that
this project is consistent with the Development Framework's emphasis on growth
in the fully developed area through reuse of land. The Housing findings, moved
by Campbell and seconded by Ulrich, were also adopted unanimously, with
Campbell indicating that the use of "affordable housing" was a more appropriate
term for this project than low and moderate income housing.
r
-4-
Thorsen moved both the introductory section and the findings in the Economic
and Fiscal Analysis. Ulrich objected, stating that she found the section
unsatisfactory. The findings were adopted 4 to 1 with Ulrich casting a
negative vote. The finding under Tourist Expenditures was adopted unanimously
as were the findings under Receipts which Ulrich stated make the case for the
development. Ulrich moved the findings under Jobs and Campbell seconded.
Thorsen moved to add language to qualify the last finding such that unskilled
and low skill jobs would be available at the mall "if new jobs are generated."
Her motion was not seconded and the Jobs section was adopted unanimously.
The findings under Tax Revenues were moved by Ulrich and seconded by Thorsen
with several committee members commenting on the wide range of numbers.
Stelzel asked that the section be titled Tax Revenue Estimates; the findings
were then adopted unanimously. Campbell moved and Thorsen seconded the
motion to delete the finding that no study had been done for the Bloomington
convention center; the motion was adopted unanimously. The remaining four
findings under Convention Center were adopted unanimously.
Thorsen moved and Campbell seconded the findings under Fiscal Disparities.
Ulrich suggested that the dollar amounts be removed from findings four and six
because the exact amount is not known. Thorsen moved and Campbell seconded to
change the language in the two findings from "would" to "could" and to add "an
estimated" before each dollar amount. The amendment passed unanimously as did
the findings.
For the Tax Increment section, Thorsen moved and Campbell seconded the findings
and the-introductory-section. Thorsen asked- that -- information be added to =the- --
introduction stating the amount of Bloomington's assessed valuation and the
capture rate which the mall development represented. Stelzel asked that the
statement about the Hennepin County guidelines be removed from the introductory
statement. Ulrich stated that Hennepin County is not a disinterested party
with regard to tax increment financing. Thorsen objected to removing the
Hennepin County guidelines. Stelzel moved to strike the Hennepin County
guidelines and Ulrich seconded. The motion to amend was defeated by the chair
on a tie vote.
The Tax Increment section was adopted unanimously with Ulrich asking to be
recorded as voting in favor of the findings but opposing the Hennepin County
guidelines. Thorsen voted in.favor but stated her concern that there was
nothing contained in the findings regarding the relative amount of tax
increment financing nor the time schedule for the expiration of the district.
The Hotel -Motel findings were adopted unanimously. In the Effects on Other
Governmental Units section, Thorsen moved to amend the first finding to qualify
the effect on attendance at the Minneapolis convention center. Stelzel
seconded and the amendment and section were both adopted unanimously.
Campbell moved Alternative Recommendation One with a change in order, moving
the portion of the recommendation dealing with the.1-494 corridor study to the
end of the recommendation with a heading stating that "the committee further
v
-5-
recommends." Campbell also moved to add stronger language to the fiscal
disparities recommendation. Ulrich seconded the motion for the purpose of
discussion. She stated that she wanted to include a list of what the 1 -494
corridor study would include and that she could not support the paragraph which
stated that development must be scaled down. Ulrich asked for a division on
the question. She moved to add language to the 1 -494 corridor study stating
that the study would determine an acceptable magnitude of traffic for the
corridor, the costs of improvements, including the acquisition of right -of -way,
the financing question of whether the tax revenues generated by the project
will cover the costs of improvement to the 1 -494 corridor, the timing of
development and the impacts on Hwy. 77 south of 1 -494, the Crosstown and
Hwy. 5. There was no second for Ulrich's motion. The paragraph dealing
with the 1 -494 corridor study was adopted unanimously; the second paragraph
calling for scaled down development was adopted 4 to 1 with Ulrich voting in
the negative. The remainder of the recommendation was adopted unanimously.
Thorsen stated that she was still somewhat uncomfortable with Alternative One
as opposed to Alternative Two. Her concern was primarily with the enforcement
powers of the Council in requiring the changes necessary to protect the
metropolitan system. Campbell noted that Council members were more comfortable
because they would have the opportunity to review the plan amendment and to
follow through on the committee recommendations while the citizen members of
the committee had had their final input into the process.
RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Council determine that
to the proposed Mall of America
That the Council determine that
causes the effects set forth in
That the Council determine that
is of metropolitan significance
the metropolitan significance regulations apply
and Fantasyworld.
the proposed Mall of America and Fantasyworld
Minn. Rules 5700.0400(D) and 5700.0500.
the proposed Mall of America and Fantasyworld
That the Council determine that the proposed Mall of America and Fantasyworld
meets the metropolitan significance standards for transportation system impacts
set forth in Minn. Rules 5700.0400(D) but is not appropriate for the exercise
of the power of suspension.
That the Council determine that the appropriate action to protect the regional
transportation system is to use the Metropolitan Land Planning Act process to
require any modifications necessary to the proposed development to insure that
the scale and timing of the development do not exceed the capacity of the
regional transportation system and do not affect the timing and funding of
other elements'of the regional transportation system. An acceptable
comprehensive plan amendment will be necessary before the city of Bloomington
will receive approval for sewer connections and interchange construction
required to serve the development.
-6-
That the Council determine that.procedures should be initiated to amend the
regional transportation plan to address the magnitude and timing of the
immediate area highway improvements in conjunction with the development of the
Mall of America and Fantasyworld. New funding sources will be necessary to
insure that state and regional priorities are maintained for other elements of
the regional transportation system.
That the Council determine that the proposed Mall of America and Fantasyworld
meets the metropolitan significance standards for substantial effects on
planned development in local governmental units set forth in Minn. Rules
5700.0500 but is not appropriate for the exercise of the power of suspension or
amendment.
That the Council determine that only one new state -level convention center can
be accommodated in the Metropolitan Area, and the location most supportive of
Council policy is in the metro center of Minneapolis.
That the Council reaffirm its long- standing commitment to the fiscal dispar-
ities program. The Council will actively oppose this exemption and any other
proposed exemptions from the fiscal disparities program before the legislature
and will actively support positive steps to improve the program and to
eliminate any existing inequities and exemptions.
The Metropolitan Significance Review Committee further recommends:
That the Council institute a study to determine an ultimate design concept for
-the- 1-494 corridor -to- accomodate -reg i ona -1 - growth -; -- -the- study- to -be- undertaken by-
the Council in cooperation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation and
affected local communities. -The study could lead to a modification of the
metropolitan transportation system plan which in turn will require modification
of the plans of local governments affected by the system plan.
That the Council use the local plan amendment process under the Metropolitan
Land Planning Act to accomplish the following:
To scale down development proposals for the entire Airport South area in
order to maintain long -term traffic volumes on 1 -494 below the capacity of
an eight lane freeway. Because of its large peak -hour trip generation
characteristics, office space development for the entire Airport South area
should be considered as a prime candidate to be reduced or converted to a
land use that generates fewer peak -hour trips.
To require the implementation of aggressive travel demand management
techniques in conjunction with the proposed development for the entire
Airport South area. Transit options should be closely evaluated by the
Regional Transit Board prior to implementation to determine their cost -
effectiveness.
Respectfully submitted,
Josephine D. Nunn, Chair
Metropolitan Significance Review Committee
r
M
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; GIVING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF
TAX INCREMENT BONDS
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A meeting, held on
December 16, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall,
Edina, Minnesota.
Members present: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner
Members absent: Courtney
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 through 2, including:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW__AREA
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX INCREMENT
BONDS
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting
recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said douments are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this 16th day of December, 1985.
(SEAL)
Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
Member introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW
AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN; GIVING PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX INCREMENT
BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. This Council has previously approved the Grandview
Area Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) and the
Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Redevelopment
Project) and the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the
Financing Plan) for the Grandview Tax Increment District
of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the
City of Edina (the HRA).
2. The Financing Plan provides that the City or
the HRA will issue approximately $4,500,000 of General Obligation
Tax Increment Bonds (the Bonds) in one or more series under
the authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Sections
273.71 to 273.78, in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan
and the Financing Plan to finance the public redevelopment
cost to be paid or incurred by the City or the HRA in connection
with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project.
The issuance of the Bonds is given preliminary approval by
the City.
3. This Resolution is intended to, and shall
constitute a "bond resolution" or "some other official action"
with respect to the Bonds and the Redevelopment Project under,
and within the meaning of Section 1.103 -8(a) of the Treasury
Regulations under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1954, as amended.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Edina, Minnesota this 16th day of December, 1985.
Deputy Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
Member Turner seconded the motion
and upon vote thereon, the following voted in favor of its
adoption: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and
the following voted against: None
whereupon the resolution was declared duly adopted.
-2-
CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO
MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS
Issuer: City of Edina, Minnesota
Governing Body: City Council
Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A meeting, held on
December 16, 1985, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. at the City Hall,
Edina, Minnesota.
Members present: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner
Members absent: Courtney
Documents Attached:
Minutes of said meeting (pages)
RESOLUTION NO.
1 through Z, including:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND
ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE
REVENUE BONDS (BILTMORE PROJECT), OF
THE CITY, FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING
A MULTIFAMILY RENTAL MORTGAGE, AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS
I, the undersigned, being duly qualified and acting
recording officer of the public corporation issuing the
obligations referred to in the title of this certificate,
certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above,
have been carefully compared with the original records of said
corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been
transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete
transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of
said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all
resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents
approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they
relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held
by the governing body at the time and place and was attended
throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and
notice of such meeting given as required by law.
WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer
this 16th day of December, 1985.
(SEAL)
-&L
Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
Councilmember Kelly introduced the
following resolution [after it had been read in full] [after
the reading thereof had been dispensed with by unanimous
consent] and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SALE AND
ISSUANCE OF MULTIFAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE
BONDS (BILTMORE PROJECT), OF THE CITY, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING A MULTIFAMILY
RENTAL MORTGAGE, AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Authorization and Recitals.
1.01. General Authority. By the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is
authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell revenue bonds or
obligations and to make or purchase loans to finance one or
more multifamily housing developments within its corporate
limits, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable
solely from the revenues of the development. This Council has
approved a Housing Plan for the City (the "Housing Plan "), by a
resolution adopted on April 19 and May 17, 1982, after a public
hearing was held thereon. The Housing Plan has been reviewed
and commented on by the Metropolitan Council pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 462C.01 and 462C.04, Subdivision
1. This Council has approved a multifamily housing program
under the Housing Plan (the "Program "), by a resolution adopted
on November 4, 1985. The program provides for the financing of
a project under the Act consisting of the acquisition,
construction and equipping by.Grandview Development Company
Limited Partnership (the Borrower) a Minnesota limited
partnership, of an approximately 152 residential unit
multifamily housing project intended primarily for the elderly
and related facilities to be located in the City (the
"Project "). The Program has been reviewed and approved by the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, as required by Minnesota
Statutes, Section 462C.04, Subdivision 2.
1.02. Proposed Bonds. Representatives of the
Borrower have proposed that the City, acting under and pursuant
to the Act, issue and sell its Multifamily Mortgage Revenue
Bonds (Biltmore Project), in an aggregate principal amount not
exceeding $13,840,000 (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of
financing the Project and paying costs incurred by the Borrower
in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Frank Dunbar is
the general partner of the Borrower, and the approval of the
Program and the preliminary approval of the issuance of the
Bonds granted by resolution of this Council adopted November 4,
1985, is hereby ratified and confirmed in the name of the
Borrower. Pursuant to the proposal, the proceeds of the Bonds
will be loaned by the City to the Borrower, and the Borrower
will agree to make payments sufficient to pay the principal of',
premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds when due. The City
will grant a security interest in certain revenues and payments
to be received by the City under the Loan Agreement (as
hereinafter defined) to a Trustee (as hereinafter defined).
1.03. Documentation. Forms of the following
documents relating to the Project and the Bonds have been
prepared and submitted to this Council and are hereby directed
to be filed in the office of the City Clerk:
(a) a Loan Agreement (the "Loan Agreement "), to be
dated as of December 1, 1985, proposed to be made and
entered into between the City and the Borrower;
(b) an Indenture of Trust (the "Indenture "), to be
dated as of December 1, 1985, proposed to be made and
entered into between the City and Norwest Bank,
Minneapolis, National Association, as trustee (the
"Trustee ");
(c) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the "Bond Purchase
Agreement "), to be dated as of December 16, 1985 proposed
to be made and entered into among Dreyfus Tax - Exempt Money
Market Fund, Inc. (the "Purchaser "), the City and the
Borrower; and
(d) a Remarketing Agreement (the "Remarketing
Agreement "), to be dated as of December 1, 1985, proposed
to be made and entered into among the Borrower, the
Trustee, the City and Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood Incorporated
(the "Remarketing Agent ").
Section 2. Findings.
It is hereby found, determined and declared that:
Eva
(a) the financing of the Project, the authorization
of the Bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of
$13,840,000, the execution and delivery of the Loan
Agreement, the Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement and the
Bond Purchase Agreement and the performance of all
covenants and agreements of the City contained in the Loan
Agreement, the Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement and the
Bond Purchase Agreement and of all other acts and things
required under the Constitution and laws of the State of
Minnesota to make the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the
Remarketing Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement and
the Bonds valid and binding obligations in accordance with
their terms, are authorized by the Act;
(b) the Program has been approved by the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency as provided in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462C.01;
(c) it is desirable that a series of Multifamily
Mortgage Revenue Bonds in the amount of $13,840,000 be
issued by the City upon the terms set forth in the
Indenture, under the provisions of which the City grants to
the Trustee a security interest in certain revenues and
payments to be received by the City under the Loan
Agreement as security for the payment of the principal of,
premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds;
(d) the loan repayments contained in the Loan
Agreement are fixed, and are required to be revised from
time to time as necessary, so as to produce income and
revenue sufficient to provide for prompt payment of
principal of and interest on all Bonds issued under the
Indenture when due; and the Loan Agreement also provides
that the Borrower is required to pay all expenses of the
operation and maintenance of the Project, including, but
without limitation, adequate insurance thereon and
insurance against all liability for injury to persons or
property arising from the operation thereof, and all taxes
and special assessments levied upon or with respect to the
site of the Project and payable during the term of the Loan
Agreement;
(e) the execution and delivery of the Loan Agreement,
the Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement and the Bond
Purchase Agreement will not conflict with, or constitute on
the part of the City a breach of or a default under, any
existing agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other
instrument to which the City is subject or is a party or by
which it is bound; provided that this finding is made
solely for the purpose of estopping the City from denying
-3-
the validity of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the
Remarketing Agreement or the Bond Purchase Agreement by
reason of the existence of any facts contrary to this
finding;
(f) no litigation is pending or, to the best
knowledge of the members of this Council, threatened
against the City questioning the organization or boundaries
of the City or the right of any officer of the City to hold
his or her office, or in any manner questioning the right
and power of the City to execute and deliver the Bonds, or
otherwise questioning the validity of the Bonds or the
execution, delivery or validity of the Loan Agreement, the
Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement or the Bond Purchase
Agreement, or questioning the appropriation of revenues to
payment of the Bonds or the right of the City to loan the
proceeds of the Bonds to the Borrower;
(g) all acts and things required under the
Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota to make
the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Remarketing
Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement the valid and
binding obligations of the City in accordance with their
terms will have been done upon adoption of this Resolution
and execution of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the
Remarketing Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement;
provided that this finding is made solely for the purpose
of estopping the City from denying the validity of the Loan
Agreement, the Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement and the
Bond Purchase Agreement by reason of the existence of any
facts contrary to this finding; and
(h) the City is duly organized and existing under the
Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota and is
authorized to issue the Bonds in accordance with the Act.
3. Approval of Documents.
The forms of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the
Remarketing Agreement and the Bond Purchase Agreement referred
to in Section 1.03 are approved subject to such modifications
as are deemed appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and
the City Manager, which approval shall be conclusively
evidenced by execution of the Loan Agreement, the Indenture,
the Bond Purchase Agreement, the Remarketing Agreement and the
Bonds by the Mayor or Deputy Mayor, the City Manager and the
City Clerk, as the case may be. The Mayor or Deputy Mayor and
City Manager are directed to execute the Loan Agreement upon
execution thereof by the Borrower, to execute the Indenture
upon execution thereof by the Trustee, to execute the Bond
-4-
Purchase Agreement upon execution thereof by the Purchaser and
the Borrower, and to execute the Remarketing Agreement upon
execution thereof by the Borrower, the Trustee, the City, and
the Remarketing Agent. Copies of all of the documents shall be
delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. The Mayor
or Deputy Mayor, the City Manager and the City Clerk are also
authorized and directed to execute such other instruments as
may be required to give effect to the transactions herein
contemplated.
4. The Bonds; Terms, Sale and Execution.
4.01. Authorization. The City hereby authorizes the
issuance of the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $13,
840,000, in the form and upon the terms set.forth in the
Indenture and this resolution. The Bonds are hereby sold to
the Purchaser at the price and upon the terms contained in the
Bond Purchase Agreement.
4.02. Execution. The Mayor or Deputy Mayor, and the
City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute the
Bonds as prescribed herein and in the Indenture and to deliver
them to the Trustee, together with a certified copy of this
resolution, the other documents required in the Indenture, and
such other certificates, documents and instruments as may be
appropriate to effect the transactions herein contemplated.
The Trustee is hereby appointed authenticating agent for the
Bonds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55,
Subdivision 1.
4.03. Modifications, Absence of Officers. The
approval hereby given to the various documents referred to
above includes an approval of such modifications thereto,
deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be necessary
and appropriate and approved by the City Attorney and the City
Manager prior to the execution of the documents. The execution
of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the
City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the
approval of such documents in accordance with the terms
hereof. In the absence or disability of the Mayor and Deputy
Mayor, any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be
executed may be executed by the acting Mayor, and in the
absence or disability of the City Manager or the City Clerk by
such officer of the City who, in the opinion of the City
Attorney, may execute such documents.
Section 5. Authentication of Proceedings.
The Mayor or Deputy Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk
and other officers of the City are authorized and directed to
-5-
furnish to the Purchaser and bond counsel certified copies of
all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds,
and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required
to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of
the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in
the officer's custody and control or as otherwise known to
them; and all such certified copies, certificates and
affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall
constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all
statements contained therein.
Section 6. Limitations of the City's Obligations.
Notwithstanding anything contained in the Bonds, the
Loan Agreement, the Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement or the
Bond Purchase Agreement or any other documents referred to in
Section 1.03, the Bonds shall not constitute a debt of the City
within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory
limitation, and shall not be payable from nor charged upon any
funds other than the revenues pledged to the payment thereof,
and no Holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel
any exercise of the taxing power of the City to pay the Bonds
or the premium, if any, or interest thereon, or to enforce
payment thereof against any property of the City other than
those rights and interests of the City under the Loan Agreement
which have been pledged to the payment thereof, and the Bonds
shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the City other than those
rights and interests of the City under the Loan Agreement which
have been pledged to the payment thereof. The agreement of the
City to perform the covenants and other provisions contained in
this resolution or the Bonds, the Loan Agreement, the
Indenture, the Remarketing Agreement or the Bond Purchase
Agreement and the other documents listed in Section 1.03 shall
be subject at all times to the availability of the revenues
furnished by the Borrower sufficient to pay all costs of such
performance or the enforcement thereof, and the City shall not
be subject to any personal or pecuniary liability thereon other
than as stated above.
Adopted: December 16, 1985.
' ✓
Deputy Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
:ti
Member Turner seconded the motion
and upon vote thereon, the following voted in favor of its
adoption: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and
the following voted against: None
whereupon the resolution
was declared duly adopted.
-7-
-I A
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE
DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
John C. Wallin is hereby designated to serve as a Director of the Suburban Rate
Authority, and J. N. Dalen is hereby designated to serve as Alternate Director
of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1986 and until their successors
are appointed.
ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1985.
�i3
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND
_ ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO LOGIS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
John C. Wallin is hereby designated as a Director of LOGIS and Kenneth E.
Rosland is hereby designated as Alternate Director of LOGIS for the year 1986
and until their successors are appointed.
ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1985.
DV 0f)T TTT T MT
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Edina Sun - Current be and is
hereby designated as the Official Newspaper for the City of Edina for the
year 1986.
ADOPTED this 16th day of December, 1985.
ILLL�L�1
MINNESOTA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS, INC.
December 9, 1985
City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council Members:
We would appreciate your designation of the Edina Sun - Current to be
your official newspaper for the year 1986.
The rate for legal publications as set by Minnesota law is 35� per
line for the first insertion and 15� per line for each subsequent
insertion.
All publications should reach this office by Thursday a.m. preceding
your Wednesday publication.
In order to expedite our services to you, it is requested that you
direct your publications to the attention of Meridel Hedblom, Legal
Publications, 7401 Bush Lake Riad, Edina, MN 55435.
We will provide at no additional charge, two notarized affidavits
on each of your publications. Additional notarized affidavits, on
request, will be furnished at 25� each.
We appreciate being considered as the official newspaper for the
City of Edina for the ensuing year and thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
MILAN TA SUBURBAN NEWSPAPERS, INC.
( c
J
L. J Canning
Pu isher
Publishers of Current Newspapers, Sailor Newspapers, Sun - Current Newspapers and Focus Newspapers
7401 Bush Lake Road • Edina, Minnesota 55435 • (612) 831 -1200
;w
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REVISION OF SEVERANCE BENEFITS
DATE: December 9, 1985
,0- ,N
As part of the revision of the City's personnel rules is a revision of the
severance benefits section of those rules. Staff is addressing this as a
separate issue in order to provide you some time and hopefully enough
information so that you can make an informed decision concerning the
proposed changes.
Generally, there are three basic changes in this section concerning
severance benefits that the City currently provides. First, rather than
tying eligibility for severance solely to a mandatory retirement age
which is now 70, it provides the severance benefits for those who qualify
for retirement benefits under PERA. Second, the conversion of some unused
sick leave is being proposed as part of the severance benefit for those
who can qualify. Third is .a general clarification of requirements for
severance and who is eligible to receive them.
Attached are the proposed changes in the form of an amendment to Ordinance
121. Also attached is the current policy. Lastly are some examples and
figures for your information.
This item will be on your next agenda, 12/16/85, for action; if you have
any questions, please contact me or Ceil Smith.
KR /sw
Attachments
DRAFT
ORDINANCE NO. 121 -A6
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 121
TO REVISE SEVERANCE PAY BENEFITS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Sec. 7 of Ordinance 121 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
"Sec. 7. Severance Pay.
A. Eligible Employees.
1. General Rule. The City shall provide
severance pay only to those employe-3s whose full -time
employment ends due to:
(a) total and permanent disability, as determined
by PERA under PERA rules;
(b) retirement before mandatory retirement age
but after becoming eligible for an immediate
retirement annuity without actuarial reduc-
tion from PERA under PERA rules; or
(c) retirement at mandatory retirement age.
2. Special Rule. The City Manager, in his sole
discretion, is authorized to award severance pay to any
employee or group of employees in full -time employment who
are terminated due to the effects of a permanent elimination
of functions by the-City.
3. Exclusion. Employees covered by a collective
bargaining agreement shall not be eligible for severance pay
under this Section 7.
B. Amount.
1. Basic Benefit. The eligible employee's
severance pay shall be an amount equal to one and one -half
(1 -1/2) days' pay multiplied by his years (including
fractional years) of continuous full -time employment with
the City, with a maximum severance pay under this paragraph
equal to four (4) weeks' pay.
2. Unused Sick Leave Benefit. In addition, if the
eligible employee has at least 1,000 hours of unused sick leave
as of the severance date, the eligible employee shall receive
severance pay in an amount equal to one day's pay for five
such days of unused sick leave, with a maximum severance pay
under this paragraph equal to two (2) weeks' pay.
C. Time. The City shall provide the severance pay
on the payday immediately following the eligible employee's
severance date. For total and permanent disability, however,
the City shall provide the severance pay on the payday
immediately following its receipt of appropriate notice of
PERA's determination.
D. Definitions. The following special definitions
apply to this Section 7:
who is eligibleE orlseverancevpay under paragraoheA of this City
Section 7. p
2. "Full -time em to ent"
City which is regu ar y engage in on
basis, as determined by the needs and
employee's department.
3. "Mandator retirement a
seventieth (70th irthday.
neans employment with the
a scheduled, full -time
particular customs in the
Le" means the employee's
4. "Pa " means the eligible employee's regular basic
salary or wage Tefore any payroll deductions) for full -time
employment, as in effect on the severance date.
5. "PERA" means the Public Employees Retirement
Association under Minnesota Statutes chapter 353 (or any
subsequent amendment or replacement thereof).
6. "PERA rules" means the requirements for an annuity
or benefit from7PERA as of December 31, 1985 (including any
changes in such requirements adopted as of that date, but
effective after that date).
7. "Severance date" means the last date on which
the eligible emp ogee per orms duties in full -time employment.
p yment.
Sec. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication and shall apply to
employees with severance dates on and after December 31, 1985.
This Ordinance supersedes all existing Ordinances on the subjects
of severance pay and pay for unused sick leave.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
17,0 Severance Pay
ofPermanent employees who retire due to reaching mandatory retirement age
of for disability or who are permanently laid off or Public Safety employees who
are permitted to retire prior to age 65 by provisions of the Public Employees
Retirement Association Act and subsequent amendments thereto, shall be granted
severance pay in the amount of V/2 days pay for each year of service with a maxi-
mum severance pay equal to 4 week's pay.
r 4
EXAMPLES - SEVERANCE BENEFITS
Female - age 70
years of service 27 years
sick leave balance 11832.3 hours
hourly rate of pay $8.712
Severance = 4 weeks $1393.92
Unused sick leave benefit 696.96
$2090.88
Male - age 64
years of service
sick leave balance
hourly rate of pay
Severance
Unused sick leave benefit
Male - age 64
years of service
sick leave balance
hourly rate of pay
Severance
Unused sick leave benefit
17 years
1271 hours
$9.344
$1495.04
506.44
$2001.48
26 years
1403.7 hours
$11.780
$1884.80
942.40
$2827.20
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A22
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD FEE FOR DOG LICENSE RENEWALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by addition
thereto of the following:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE N0.
312 10 Dog License Renewal $5.00 per dog or 7f -1
$2.00 per neutered dog
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect following its
passage and publication for all dog license renewals to be effective January 1,
1986, and thereafter.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Mayor and Council
Planning
Administration
- Finance
Election
Assessing
Legal and Court Service
Public Works:
Administration
Engineering
Other
Police ,Protection
Fire Protection
Civil D.bfense
Animal Control
Health
Inspections
Contingencies
Special Assessments on
City Property
Central Services -
Capital Outlay
Capital Improvements
Commissions and Special
Projects
Park and Recreation:
Administration 391,356 379,079 12,277* 12,300
Recreation 105,451 99,900 5,551* 5,600
Maintenance 588,424 597,980 9,556 9,500
$9,664,149 $9,509,299 1 $154,850 $251,500 $95,500.
STA7 T OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
__..1 RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS
FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1985
For Year 1985
Estimated
Transfer
Expenditures
Appropriation
Balance
To
From
Remarks
$ 41,706
$ 37,723
$ 3,983*
$ 4,000
Higher cost of; insurance and conferences and schools.
140,149
139,578
571*
600
Higher cost of contractual service.
`342,554,
318,187
24,367*
24,400
Labor arbitration.
238,990
233,435
5,555*
5,600
Payroll
16,320
16,380
60
221,397
217,650
3,747*
3,800
Higher cost of data processing.
s 308,711
226,000
82,711*
82,800
Higher personal and court charges.
75,372
81,038
5,666
$ 5,600
329,031
311,521
17,510*
17,600
Higher cost of outside engineering services.
2,192,809
2,249,387
56,578
56,500
2,395,629,
2,394,519
1,110*
1,200
Higher cost of data processing.
1,533,936
1,473,840
60,096*
60,100
Higher cost of payroll.
28,874
31,060
2,186
2,100
37,223
45,384
8,161
8,100
197,729
207,523
9,794
9,700
155,503
159,524
4,021
4,000
100,259
80,000
20,259*
20,300
See Attached.schedule.
75,000
75,000
28,900
16,000
12,900*
12,900
Automobiles(Transfer , f'rom Reserve for Commitments(15,000)
40,000
40,000
-
78,826
78,591
235*
300
Contractual Services, supplies.
Skating & Hockey and playground salaries.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS CONTINUED
For Year 1985
Estimated Transfer
Expenditure Appropriation Balance To From Remarks
Central Services
General
$1,513,823
$1,431,480
$ 82,343*
$ 82,500
Higher cost of insurance.
City Hall
101,927
89,100
12,827*
13,000
Supplies
Public.Works Bldg.
116,260
110,340
5,920*
6,000
Repair parts.
Equipment Operation
752,766
695,640
57,126*
57,200
Repair parts.
$2484,776
$2,326;560
$158,216
$158,700 — -
Allocated to other
Departments and
Funds 2,326,560 2,326,560
$ 158,216 $ -0 -. $158,216 $158,700 $ -0-
$9,822,365 $9,509,299 $313,066 $410,200 $95,500
Recommend an increase in estimated revenue as follow-9-
Reserve for Commitments $ 43,700
Higher Court Fine and Court Costs 10,000
Building Permits - Edinborough Project 75,000
.Loan from Surplus =186,000
$314,700
GENERAL FUND
Surplus at January 1, 1985
Estimated revenue for year
Less Transfer from surplus
Less estimated expenditures
Central Services - Net
Balance at December 31, 1985
$9,826,303
(186.000
9,664,149
158.216
NOTE'A - Disbursements charged to contingencies
for 1985 are as follows:
Office Equipment
Metro Area Management Association
Police Recording tapes
Computer Programming
Award Dinner & Plaques
Wooddale Utilities
Wooddale Moving
Micro filming
Employees Assistance Program
News letter
Municipals
Miscellaneous -small items under $100
Printing
Advertising
General Supplies
Repairs
MN Safety Council
Insurance
Interest Special Assessments
Mobil Phone
Voting Machine rent
Surveying
Traffic Projections - Homart
November and December items
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS CONTINUED
$ 512,872 .
9,640,363
$10,153,235
9,822,365
$ 330,870
$ 12,961
10,550
4,267
7,764
1,375
17,296
622
2,278
2,625
1,328
611
150
1,764
105
2,001
259
726
450
667
1,495
1,500
890
3,575
25,000
$ 100,259
BALANCE RESERVE -FOR COMMITMENTS AT DECEMBER 31, 1985.
Capital Improvements (street replacement)
Capital Improvements (general type)
Improvements - City Hall
Accounting System
Micro film equipment
Police - pension supplement
School Assessing
Radio equipment - Police
Vehicle replacement - Animal Control
Reserve for fire equipment
Siren - Civil Defense
$217,287
49,583
2,400
13,500
5,550
11,200
3,000
35,000
3,000
91,900
15,000
$447,420
1395 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 1
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 9 MESSAGE
320245 12/09/85 29.. ROBERT 8 HILL �- SALT 10- 4538-440 -44
50
^ 999999 * ** -CKS 'I
a n.
337354 12/09/85 19334.82 RINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 1130 - 000 -00 MANUAL
' 337354 12/09/85 648.68 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10 -4254- 446 -44 MANUAL
337354 _ - _- 12/09/85 _ 341.05 HEAT_ _10- 4254 - 520 -52 ._ _ _ MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 29952.12 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10 -4254- 540 -54 MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 13.82 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254- 629 -62 MANUAL
" _ 337354 ^12/09/85 710.11 _ MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254- 646 -64 -- _ MANUAL
337354 12/09185 119.51 MINNEGASCO HEAT 23 -4254- 611 -61 MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 232.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27- 4254 - 661 -66 MANUAL
- 337354 12/09/85 - 107.01 MINNEGASCO 27- 4254 - 662 -66 MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 39082.17 MINNEGASCO MEAT 28 -4254- 708 -70 MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 57.40 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254- 801 -80 MANUAL
" 337354 12/09/85 19817.55 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 803 -80 _MANUAL _
337354 12/09/85 150.02 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50 -4254- 841 -84 MANUAL
337354 12/09/85 171.93 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254- 861 -86 MANUAL
: _ - -- - - -- - - - -- 11737.37
21 999999 ** +-CKS i
2. z.+
337358 12/09/85 29730.53 MUTUAL BENEFIT EMPLOYERS PREMIUM 10 -4158- 510 -51 MANUAL
29730.53
27 +1
;� 999999 * ** -CKS
''337391 12/.09/85 15.00 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10-1130- 000 -00 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 329.60 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL
337391 1.2/09/85 139117.23 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 321-30 MANUAL
337391 __ 12/09/8599842.09 NORTHERN_- STATES - -- ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 322 -30 _ - MANUAL
" 337391 12/09/85 29361.16 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 330 -30 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 263.35 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL I`I
337391 12/09/85 97.21 NORTHERN_ STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 358 -30 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 19878.60 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 742.48 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL,
332391 1Z/09185 NORTHERN_ STATES ELECTRIC_ 10- 4252 - 460 -46 _ _ _ MANUAL
337391 V 12/09/85 19043.32- NORTHERN STATES CORRECTION 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 43.32 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL
337391 _12/09/85_ 19040_.87 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 520 -52 MANUAL
337311 12/09/85 19349.89 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 540 -54 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 314.93 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 629 -62 MANUAL
337391 12109/85 532..84 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 646 -64 -`_ -_- MANUAL
°6 337391 12/09/85 15.00- NORTHERN STATES CORRECTION 20 -1130- 000 -00 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 15.00 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 20- 1130 - 000 -00 MANUAL ,
°P 337391 12/09/85 421.08 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 23- 42522-611 -61 MANUAL I ^ °�
337391 12/09/85 162.24 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26- 4252- 689 -68 MANUAL
' 337391 12/09/85 661.01 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27- 4252- 661 -66 MANUAL I ^,I
-_- 337391 12/09/85- _ 156.56. NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC _ 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL n
2 337391 12/09/85 59509.35 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28- 4252-708 -70 MANUAL
337391 12/09/85 363.16 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 29- 4252- 721-72 MANUAL '
nl
'° 337391 12/09/85 19871.31 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL X21
337391 12/09/85 375.66 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL
'° 337391 12/09/85 65.47 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 4D- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL
1385 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -16 -85 PAGE 2
v
•r* -CKS
14W 3
337430 12/09/85 1
19062.92 STATE PERA EMPLOYER PREMIUM 10- 4145 - 510 -51 M
MANUAL
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N
P.O. # MESSAGE
.. 337391
12/09/85
478.44
NORTHERN STATES
ELECTRIC
50- 4252 - 821 -82
MANUAL
33739112/09
_
/BS_
799.39 _.
_ NORTHERN STATES
ELECTRIC
50- 4252 - 841 -84
MANUAL
337391
109/85
2/
562.73
NORTHERN STATES
ELECTRIC
50- 4252 - 861 -86
_
MANUAL
v 439355.17 •
* ** -CKS
337415 - 79776.00 MED CENTER EMPLOYERS CONT 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
- 7,776.00 • - - _.- - - - - -- - -- - --
W
• • f r • f
•r* -CKS
14W 3
337430 12/09/85 1
19062.92 STATE PERA EMPLOYER PREMIUM 10- 4145 - 510 -51 M
MANUAL
199762.92 +
Aw •
•••••• *
** *-CKS
�'I� 3
337523 12/09/85 8
89096.99 SOCIAL SECURITY SMPLOYER CONT 10 -4149- 510 -51 M
MANUAL
,r 8
89096.99
* ** -CKS
337538 12/09/85 227.70 WESTERN LIFE EMPLOYER PREMIUM 10- 4157 - 510 -51
227.70
- - - * — - - - --
i-„
e►,'i 337700 12/09/85 308.75 ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4200- 500 -50
337700 — 12/09/85 31.92 ERIC ANDERSON MILEAGE 10- 4208-500_-50
- - - -- - -- 340.67 • -- - - - -- - -
40E3'!
_33,7.T01_______ 12/09/85 - 175.00 EDINA EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50
175.00 * - - -
�j�''' r
337702 12/09/85 200.00_ GENE BARTZ SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 500 -50
L I- --- - - - - 200.00 * - - -- -
�' 12
337703 /09/85 2900_0.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51
-_ -- - 29000.00
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/11/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
hz
v " 350005 12/11/85
�i =el r•• * *r
- _ - - - - MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
- - -- - -- - -- MANUAL
- - - -- - -__ ---
----MANUAL
- -- - -- MANUAL
-- - MANUAL,
* ** -CKS
118.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44
7.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 482 -48
154.02 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52
11.67 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 628 -62
42.31 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 822 -82
46.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 -
49.32 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86
429.44 *
37.25 AUDIO GROUP
37.25 *
ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 822 -82
* ** -CKS
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/11/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
350004 12/06/85
hz
v " 350005 12/11/85
�i =el r•• * *r
- _ - - - - MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
- - -- - -- - -- MANUAL
- - - -- - -__ ---
----MANUAL
- -- - -- MANUAL
-- - MANUAL,
* ** -CKS
118.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44
7.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 482 -48
154.02 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52
11.67 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 628 -62
42.31 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 822 -82
46.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 -
49.32 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86
429.44 *
37.25 AUDIO GROUP
37.25 *
ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 822 -82
* ** -CKS
�i =el r•• * *r
- _ - - - - MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
- - -- - -- - -- MANUAL
- - - -- - -__ ---
----MANUAL
- -- - -- MANUAL
-- - MANUAL,
* ** -CKS
118.17 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 440 -44
7.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 482 -48
154.02 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52
11.67 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 628 -62
42.31 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 822 -82
46.85 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 -
49.32 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86
429.44 *
37.25 AUDIO GROUP
37.25 *
ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 822 -82
* ** -CKS
37.25 AUDIO GROUP
37.25 *
ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 822 -82
* ** -CKS
-
. ,
_ . xyus'C` . OF cozmx cxcCn R.'^oxcn 12-16-85 .xsc o
. _-'cwc�K-�0�-n . �I_P.g._#_ MESSAGE
__
�
n50007 au/m/u52o~no-______ APEX -PEST comTR 04-708-70 09147--'
'
22 .00
°
-|` ~ '
|"| ,
sn000s
.-�—'---'-
���
IL 350012
12/09/85
24.95
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56 82918
350013
12/10/85
16.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-301-30 56059
350013
12/10/85
85.90
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARATS
—4540-560-56
12/06/85
72.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
10-4256-510-51
1PL350015
350015
12/06/85
44 - .53
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
23-4256-611-61
350017
12/09/85
147.20
ALLIED PLASTICS
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-520-5214407
350018
12/06/85
18.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
40-4256-801-80
350018
12/06/85
9.00
-1
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
—4256-821-82
350018
57
12/06/8
6 4
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50-42t6-841-84
350018
12/06/85
18.00
AT & T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50-4256-861-86
350.028
12/09/85
_2t7l5joj 0
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50-4630-842-84
350031
12/ID/85
206.15
350033
12/11/85
82.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-822-82
t4 350033
12/06/85
201.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-822-82
"'i3
221.61
BERGFORO TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-842-:-84
12/06/85
406.50
BERGFORO TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-842-84
sn000s
.-�—'---'-
���
I-
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
12/06/85
CHECK REGISTER
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
12-16-85 PAGE 4
40-4504-803-80
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO* INV. b P.O._p MESSAGE
350033
12/11/85
98.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-862-86
350033
12/06/85-____
346.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50-4626-862-86
19356.11 •
t ** -CKS
r+ +-CKS
350038
12/11/85
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERV
10-4100-420-42
350041
12/06/85
119.35
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
4P, '
350039
12/06/85
139.94
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
GEN SUPPLIES
40-4504-803-80
139.94 •
t ** -CKS
350041
12/06/85
119.35
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10-4524-301-30
23058
350041
12/06/85
569.50
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
40-4524-803-80
23058
6 88.8 5 •
***-CKS
350044
12/09/85
4.28
BILL BOYER FORD
REPAIR
PARTS
10-4540-560-56
514568
4.28
*•*-CKS
___350
- 047__ - --
_12/09/85 5 -----30.30
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO
SUPPLIES
10-4508-440-44
417476
30.30
***-CKS
350053
12/06/85
141.39
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-301-30
350053
12/06/85 - --
43.56-BROWNING--FERRIS-REFUSE-
COLLECT ION-
1.0-4 250-446-44
350053
12/06/85
55.42
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-520-52
`r,'
350053 350053
12/06/85
141.39
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-540-54
350053
12/06/85
65.81
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-628-62
350053
12/06/85.
43.56
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-646-64
op
350053
12/06/85
128.39
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
10-4250-646-64
350053 -----'
12/06/85
10.88
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
23-4250-611-61
350053
REFUSE
-COLLECTION
-27-4250- 662-66
350053
350053
12/06/85
12/06/85
80.48
262.40
BROWNING FERRIS
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
REFUSE
COLLECTION
COLLECTION
23-4250-708-70
50-4250-841-84
350053
12/06/85
311.75
BROWNING FERRIS
REFUSE
COLLECTION
50- 4250- 861 -86
--
40
19328.59
***-C KS
350.058
12/11/85
100.00
WAYNE BENNETT
POLICE
SERV
10-4100-420-42
100.00
***-CKS
350060
12/10/85
82.60
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27-4624-664-66
82.60 •
.17
* +* -CKS
0
qp 1935 * C OF EDINA CHECK i ;TER 12-16-85 GE 5
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. X P.O. # MESSAGE
350062
12/09/85
--.-,—.147.2 0
BROCK-WHIT;7
CONSTR CTION
27-1300-000-00
149941
147.20
frffff
**•-CKS
350073
12/09/85
82.60
CITY BEER
INVENTORY
50-4630-842-84
350073
I-NVEN-TO.R.1
50--46-30-,862-86
235.40 *
35OU74
12/10/85
79266.00
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
SPEC ASSESS
66-1115-000-00
79266.00 *
350075
12/06185
10.05
CLANCY ORUGINC
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-200-20
350075
12/06/85
3.80
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-420-42
350075
12/06/85
23.74
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-510-51
37.59
* +* -CKS
2-/-11/85
187.05 ---
COCA -COLA -8OTTLING---liV-;NT-OR-Y
50-4632-822-82
350078
12/11/85
637.00
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50-4632-842-84
824.05 *
350079
12/09/85
40.00
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
361418
12./09/85
221.41
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
360856
261.41 &
F- -- —
—
--
_it-CKS
350082
12/03/85
92.00
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10-4274-440-44
77458
350081_
12/10/85---
---.49.25--CONWAY
FIRE _8 SAFETY -EQUIP
' MAINT
77460
350032
12/09/85
70.60
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPPLIES
.10-4274-440-44
10-4504-449-44
77613
350082
12/09/85
175.10
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-449-44
77458
386.95
frfftf
* +* -CKS
350090
12/06/85
221.80
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
221.80
+ ** -CKt
50044
—12,- -618 5
59.00
CASH REGISTER SALES
falLILF1 MAINT
1-66
59.00
350095
12/11/85
326.74
COMMISSIONER REVENUE
GASOLINE
10-4612-560-56
---
326.74
* *+ -CKS
350097
12/06/85
258.00
COURTNEY C WAYNE
CONFERENCE
10-4202-100-10
350097
12/06/85
38.87
COURTNEY C WAYNE
MILEAGE
10-4208-100-10
296.87
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 6
w_
1 _ _CHECK_N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. tNV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
350106 100.00 - BAHL MR HILDING POLICE SERV 10- 4100- 420 -42
100.00 +
350108 12/06/85 15.00 DALE GREEN CO SOD &.BLACK DIRT 10- 4562- 353 -30
15.00 •
� arra►f
350110 12/09/85 405.30 DAVIOSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84
.. 405.30 +
151
+ ++ -CKS
+ ++-CKS
++ +-CKS
r
350130________ 12/10/85 413.40 DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY CDNT REPAIRS 28-4248-707-70
350130 12/11/85 21.00 DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY CDNT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70
434.40 +
�i •rra►• - - _ --
_ + +i -CKS
1= °;_- _350134 __12/1 -1185 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CDNT REPAIRS 50- 4248-841 -84
-I 36.75 • -- .. - - - _
IV .,l
c
1.
350124
12/11/85
61.55-
DALEN
J. N.
DUE HRS
10 -1145- 000 -00
350124
12/11/85
79.25
DALEN
J.N.
MEETINGS
10- 4206- 160 -16
-
a.
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30 c
17.70
_ 350148
_ -- 12.15
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 449 -44
350125
12/11/85
- 89.70
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPP
10 -4504- 647 -64"
or "I
350125
12/09/85
284.35
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
13610
_
_350125__
12/09/85
393.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 540 -54
13609
350125
_
12/06/85
47.70
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
2J -4504- 611 -61
10- 4224- 421 -42 348474 C
350125
12/10/85
496.70
MERIT
SUPPLY .
CLEAN SUPPLIES
28- 4512 - 708 -70
13616
12/11/85
350125
- 12/09/85
CORRECTION
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 801 -80
13579
50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN
350125
12/09/85
53.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80
_
13570
50 -4206- 820 -82
•
19523.45 +
20.00 +
i
+.i -CKS -
r
r
350130________ 12/10/85 413.40 DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY CDNT REPAIRS 28-4248-707-70
350130 12/11/85 21.00 DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY CDNT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70
434.40 +
�i •rra►• - - _ --
_ + +i -CKS
1= °;_- _350134 __12/1 -1185 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CDNT REPAIRS 50- 4248-841 -84
-I 36.75 • -- .. - - - _
IV .,l
c
1.
t
"z affftl
-
--
a+f -CKS
- -- ---
ar�
°^ 350148
12/10/85
122.90
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30 c
_ 350148
_ -- 12.15
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 449 -44
135.05 +
o rafrrr
•+ +-CKS
r
== 350156
12/06/85
34.25
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
SERVICES
10- 4224- 421 -42 348474 C
"
34.25
350157
12/11/85
20.00-
50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN
CORRECTION
10- 4206 - 820 -82
350157
12/11/85
20.00
50TH FRANCE BUS ASSN
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 820 -82
350157
t'°
12/11/85
20.00
50TH.FRANCE BUS ASSN
MEETING EXPENSES
50 -4206- 820 -82
•
20.00 +
t
. 1385'Cl.. OF EDINA CHECK RL„aSTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 7
-_C HECK__NO.__DA.TE_ T- ,AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV._ 0_P.O._ .p- MESSAGE _-
Z
' a. # #f• ** *-CKS
' 350164 12/10/85 29.46 FREEWAY DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 53307
` 350164 12/10/85 18.68 FREEWAY DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 53618
48.14 • __._ _.- -- - -- - - -- --
'I *fr##• *** -CKS
350183 12/10/85
350183 12/10/85
350183 12/10/85
.,I
PARTS
40 -4540- 802 -80
350194__
"
350194
z'I
60765
315.20 GIVENS INC
_367.15 GIVENS__INC
500.70 GIVENS INC
19183.05 •
12/06/85- 100.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS_
12/09/85 377.50 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
477.50 *
REPAIR
PARTS
40 -4540- 802 -80
60573
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540- 802 -80
60765
REPAIR
PARTS
40 4540- 802 -80
60572
RADIO SERV 10- 42_94- 420 - 42.21524
RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 440 -44 21522
*i r**f
I
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
12_350206_ -
-- _.12/06/85_
983.41.
G
B__K
-&
SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
28.17
350206
.12/06/85
451.75
G
REPAIR PARTS
K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
16- 4262 - 560 -56
-I;
350206
12/06/85
285.85
G
8
K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
35.47
1' 35D2.06.__
-._ "1,2/06/85
265.10.
G
B
K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40 -4262- 801 -80
12/09/85
350209
12/10/85
19986.11
GENUINE
PARTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 -_ 340 - 30_9.3326
173.10
50220
12/09/85
477 *13 -
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
CORRECTION
*i r**f
I
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
350209
12/10/85
28.17
GENUINE
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
350209i2/10/8513.23
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
6ENUINEPARIS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
" 350209
12/10/85
37.12
GENUINE
PARTS
L•'"
350209
12/10/85
35.47
GENUINE
PARTS
CO
35020'3_____12
/10/85_
37.12
GENUINE
PARTS
12/09/85
350209
12/10/85
21.99
GENUINE
PARTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 -_ 340 - 30_9.3326
173.10
50220
12/09/85
*i r**f
I
*** -CKS
*** -CKS
350213 1.2/11/85 240.00 LEROY H LIBBY CONT SERV 40 -4200- 800 -80
240.00 * - - - - --
., ri #tai,
350218 12/11/85 921.20 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 21501
921.20 *
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
274086
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
274614
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
--
273820
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
273884
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
273778
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
275479
350213 1.2/11/85 240.00 LEROY H LIBBY CONT SERV 40 -4200- 800 -80
240.00 * - - - - --
., ri #tai,
350218 12/11/85 921.20 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10 -4618- 560 -56 21501
921.20 *
** *-CKS
- ..- *** -CKS
* ** -CKS
- -
350220
12/09/85
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 340 -30
93421
177.13
vls�
350220
12/09/85
477.13
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 340 -30
93421
'•
350220
12/09/85
280.68
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 -_ 340 - 30_9.3326
°S
50220
12/09/85
477 *13 -
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
CORRECTION
10 -4504- 340 -30
°50220
I,
12/09/85
177.13-
HAR
NED
LUMBER
CO
CORRECTION
10 -4540- 340 -30
93421
** *-CKS
- ..- *** -CKS
* ** -CKS
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
12 -16 -85
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. a P.O. 0
MESSAGE
I
�i'
350220
12/09/85
177.13
HAR NED LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4540- 340 -30
93421
-
- - - - --
- - -- - - - --
- - - - - -" 457.81 •
** *- CKS
'
350228
12/10/85
108.00
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
GEN SUPPLIES -- -
10 -4504- 560 -56
-
..,I
350228
12/10/85
1 050.70
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
•
°I
350228
12/10/85
- --
_ -- 71.64
- - -
- HILLSTROM AUTO
-- - --
SUP Y
TOOLS
10 -4 4580 - 560 -56
350228
12/10/85
240.21
- - -
HILLSTROM AUTO
- -- _—._
SUP Y
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
-- - - -- - -
-
19470.55 +
-
i i
rr #► #r
--
- -------
-- - --- -- - -
-- -
** *-CKS
y �
_350234
- _12/06/85—
- -
14.55_
-
HOOTEN CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 420 -42
14.55
_
l._•r*r#r
CKS
350245
12/06/85
17.86
ROBERT B HILL
PARTS
27- 4620 - 661 -66
Z1
� ---
-- - - - - - --
17.86 •
=i
v
* ** -CKS
i
350248
12/09/85
148.03
HARMON GLASS
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4 4248- 560 -56
100071
350249
12/11/85
100.00
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
POLICE SERV
10 -1100- 420 -42
-
100.00 •
I
- —
I
#r#* #r
* ** -CKS
350256
149.60
ICSI
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 420 -42
14378
14i.66 *
- - -- - --
- - -"
f__�
- ---
*r # #**
- -- -- •----
- - - - -- - - --
--
_—
** *-CKS
,
,..
350275
12/09/85
86.91
INTERSTATE
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540- 560 -56
013072
- - - --
- - --
86.91 •
***-CKS
i
-
--
-- - - - - --
350278
- - -- - --- - --
12/09/85
19.95
-- -- - - --
JERRYS FOODS
- - --
CONF R SCHOOL
10- 4262- 440 -44
•.I"
350278
12/06/85
30.98
JERRYS'FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 600 -60
" .
* ** -CKS
C
350289
12/11/85
100.00
WALTER JOHNSON
POIIGE SERV
10- 4100 = 420 =42
--
ow 5-
-
- - -- - - - - - --
-- -- - - - - --
100.00
=
#k # ##•
- -. __
..
I_.'.—
.350296
1- 2/09/85
30.27
KAPLAN BROS.
CLOTHING REPLACEMENT
10 -4574- 440 -44
3168
,
vls�
30.27 •
— --- - - -...
-
#r*ra*
--- - - - - --
--
*-** -CKS
- --
- -- - - - --
-
v
1985 CITY OF EDINA
!'4Fri( mn- nATF AmmiNT
CHECK REGISTER
urmnno Trru nrcrovnvwnw
12-16-85 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO INV- # P.O. # MESSAGE
12/10/85---.---..442.36..-----KREMER
-- SPRG & ALIGN_
REPAI R P ARTS
009335
350301
12/10/85
158.26
KREMER SPRG. & ALIGN
REPAIR PARTS
-10-4540-560-56
10-4540-560-56
009336
600.62
I.
***-CKS
350304
LUMBER CO
CONSTY
27-1300-000-00
397442
330304
12/10/85
23.47
KNOX LUMBER CO
PARTS
27-4620-661-66
397357
166.31
____350311.-
..___
-_- 12/.11/85__
39596.30
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
I NV EN T OR T
50- 4630 - 862.- 86__._
3,596.30
-CKS
12/06/85
467.62
ANCHOR PAPER
PAPER SUPPLIES
10-4514-520-52
211350315
_
67.62
•
za
12/09/85
101.56
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 322 -30
63389
+ +* -CKS
350317
12/09/85
77.20
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-328-30
631190
J----
-350317-----------12/09/85.
2613.12
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
631189
350317
12/03/85
469.52
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS'
.10-4504-646-64
10-4620-560-56
633898
350317
12/09/85
62.34
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10-4620-560-56
631191
978.74
lz
350318
97.80
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10-4262-440-44
350318
12/11/85
13.5
- 0
- - -
LEEF BROS INC
--Gg-N
SUPPLIES
23 -4504-611-61
350318
12/11/85
10.00
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
27-4262-662-66
121.30
•
17
350319
12/10/85
102.00
`LIEN CH9ICAL COMPANY
SERVICES
27- 4236 - 661 -66
102.00
•• .-CKS
350325 ----12/09/85
47.46
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
10--4540-560-56
028117
350325
12/09/85
21.45
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
026531
J
350325
12/09/85
60.50
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
028165
-I
- FORCL- T-RACTR-KP,AIR
PARTS
27-4540-662-66
027947
157.31
• **-CKS.
350331
12/09/85
234.64
LAHASS CORPORATION
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
--
----
2150 331------
12/09/85
34 . 3 0
LAHASS CORPORATION
RE-PAIR-PARTS-
10-4.540-560-56
34208
350331
12/10/85
88.2C
AH SS
L A CORPORATION
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-662-66
34073
457.14
•
"_'.
-._.
350343.____
_.._.12/09/85
47.30
MINNESOTA GLnVF
rrm qljPPl Tfr-q
�n- atne_in�_tn
tan
v
r
r
r
b
b
i
'' riiff•
1385 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -16 -85
PAGE 10
12/06/85
329277.00
MET N BASTE C L COMM
BLDG PERMITS
_
10 -3095- 000 -00
329277.00
•
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 4
MESSAGE
•• *-CKS
350358
12/11/85
5.00
3 ALARM SERVICE
ALARM.SERV
23- 4304 -61 610 -b1
%w2
350343
12/09/85
40.00
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80 3190
- frrfff
".3
- - - - -- - ---------
- -- - --
87.30 •
--
--- - -- --
ffr —CKS
I2a 350356
_12/11/85
vi'
350344
12/10/85
62.93
MED
OXYGEN B
EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 449 -44
•
°
350344
12/10/85
139.00
MED
OXYGEN &
EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 449 -44
350344
12%10/85
16.80
MED
OXYGEN &
EQUIP
EQUIP JMlAINT
1b= 4274 = X49 -44
I'
SIB
350344
12110185
37.18
MED
OXYGEN &
EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440 -44
°L
350344
- --
12/10/85
17.05
MED
OXYGEN &
EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44
^i
272.96 +
350360
12/10/85
38.00
--
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 322 -30 061755
_
" 350360
12/10/85
79.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 061526
350360
12/10/85
40.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56 061775
37
158.00
•
3° f4lffi
-- - --
--
• •: -CKS
--- - - - - --
v
r
r
r
b
b
i
'' riiff•
•fi -CKS-
350346
12/06/85
329277.00
MET N BASTE C L COMM
BLDG PERMITS
_
10 -3095- 000 -00
329277.00
•
.tf tf.
•• *-CKS
350358
12/11/85
5.00
3 ALARM SERVICE
ALARM.SERV
23- 4304 -61 610 -b1
2'
Z.
5.00
- frrfff
".3
--
--- - -- --
ffr —CKS
I2a 350356
_12/11/85
49.75
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
BLUE PRINTING
10- 4570 - 260 -26
'
se
49.75
•
- - --
2 fffiii
—
.—
• *• —CKS
as--
---
------ ._
L9 350358
12/10/85
232.65
3M ALARM SERVICE
CONT SERV
27- 4200- 661-66
232.65
132 4 ►kitf
33
* +• -CKS
350360
12/10/85
38.00
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 322 -30 061755
_
" 350360
12/10/85
79.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56 061526
350360
12/10/85
40.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56 061775
37
158.00
•
3° f4lffi
-- - --
--
• •: -CKS
--- - - - - --
350365
12111/85
100.00
BURT MERFELD
POLICE SERV
10- 4100- 420 -42
°2
100.00
•
350366
12/09/85
515.75
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
— 350366
12/11/85
414.15
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
<°
,47
929.90
-
ne fiktik
iff —CKS
350378
12/09/85
89683.65
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY,
50- 4630 - 842 -84
" 350378
12/09/85
4980.1.65
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY,
50 -4630- 862 -86
'2
33
139405.30
-- .-_. --
'" 350379
12/10/85
35.40
METRO FONE COMM
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 301 -30
—
se
� tiff kf
35.40
•
—
aaa— v
Imo..
i
R '
I!
va;
1935-C. . OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK k, -LSTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 11
or Wln no rrru — rnu
2
'
_._._35038112/10/85_
528.00
STAR. & TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212_440 -44
350381
12/10/85
266.25
STAR 8 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
23 -4214- 610 -61
'
0
794.25
7
e
f!!f!f
••* —CKS
350385____.12
/11/85
120.00
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTION
10`4242- 353 -30
350385
12/11/85
720.00
MCGUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTION
60- 1300 - 012-18
X13
- - --
840.00
13
-_
••• -CKS
"
350406
12/10/85
61.28
NTCC NN REGION
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
634850
1�
17
61.28 *
- ----------
--__..
0
lffttf
-
• ++ -CKS
2O
350412
12/06/85
68.37
NY GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENTORY
23- 1209 - 000 -00
68.37 •
22
z]
24
a!! +!!
• ** -CKS
21
350420
12110/85
6.16
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
2e
2I
6.16 •
20
350421
12/10/85
106.55
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 340 -30
49858
2'
350421
12/10/85
47.73
OLSON CHAIN & CABLE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 340 -30
49280
154.28 •
]z
fr*fra
--
* ** -CKS
350429
12/11/85
458.75
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632-822 -82
-Y
—
"
350429
12/09/85
504.25
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
35-Q429 12/09/85
283.15
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
1246.15
]a
t�,rrlf
- - - --
--
* *a-CKS
_ _
_
350434
12/10/85
116.24
PRINTERS SERVICE INC
EQUIP MAINT
28- 4274- 707 -70
783
116.24
4d
*tr**
•* *—CKS
40
350439
12/06/85
19949.78
PRIOR LAKE AG
SAND GRAVEL ROCK
10 -4522- 318 -30
"'
.0
19949.78
eo
* ** -CKS
"
__350441 12L1.0_L$5
193.00_-
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
10- 4600- 629 -62
60303
193.00 •
- - - --
- —
— --
S4
f***aa
* ** —CKS
ee
ee
350450
12/10/85
7.58
PBE
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
251619
Y
1985 CITY OF EDINA
r mrrK rin- IIATC AonjINT
CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 12
* ** -CKS
°
_350460
12/11/85
110.80
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
'
350460
12/11/85
139.40
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
-
°
350460
12/11/85
150.15
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
!00.35
i 350461
12/06/85
31.45
REED SALES B SERVICE
REPAIR PARATS
27 -4540- 662 -66
154097
�,
-- -- - - -- —
- -- —
31.45 +
4
f
350463
12/11/85
39086.95
REX DIST
INVENTORY
50 -1630- 842 -8!
—
- - - --
* ** -CKS
--
0
"
I19
- - --
3.086.95 •
+ +;—CKS
_350470
12/11/85
25.00
OR ROCKWELL
MED SERV
10- 4100 - 481 -48
C`Z
z
25.00 •
-- - - - - --
]4
*f * *t*
* ** -CKS
I'e
350484
12/06/85
89.65
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
t?-
°I
- - - - - --
89.65
�'-
350485
12/06/85
3024.15
STATE BLDG INSP
BLDG PERMITS
10- 3095 - 000 -00
-
_ - -- -- -
12/06/85
107.00
STATE BLDG INSP
SUR CHARAGE TAX
10- 3113- 000 -00
�Z
39531.15 •
---
— 350486
12/06/85
19156.00
DON STREICHER GUNS
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
312286
34
19156.00 *
--
- — - -
-- -- - -
-•.I
f f f f f f
- - - - -- -
- - --
* ** -CKS
°
350490
12/09/85
82.75
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 322 -30
713280
'°
_ - - --
82.75 +
4,
*fk f ff
350492
12/10/85
8.00
SOUTHOALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4 4540 - 560 -56
105650
—
'"
350492
12/10/85
22.38
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
105805
350492_
12/10_185
67.56
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540_ —_ 560 -56
105606_____
4°
350492
12/10/85
77.41
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4510- 560 -56
106681
_
47
4°
175.35 +
4i
350493
12/09/85
59298.65
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842-84
-
'c
350493
12/09/85
87.00
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
5385.65
54
** *-CKS
"
350495
12/06/85
80.50
SOUTHTOWN REEFRIG
EQUIP MAINT
27 -4274- 661 -66
66
80.50 +
�37
FOR
s
F.
Ei
1385.C. - OF EDINA
f HFf K Nn_ nATC AMnlifJT
CHECK k__.STER 12 -16 -85 eAGE 13
ki r RM no rrru
12
350502
12/10/85
2.18
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540- 560 -56
49889
e
350502
350502
_ 12/10/8.5
12110/85
63.68
3.90
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
10-4540Z'-560-'56-49535
49535
_
]
'
a
n
_
350503
-
12/09/85
69.76
196.16
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
852700
10
330503
12/09/85
55.92
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
847627
12
350503
350503
_12/09/85
12/09/85
196.16
196.05
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUBURBAN PLUMB _
SUP
SUP
PARTS
PARTS
10- 462.0- 560 - 56_852700
10 -4620- 560 -56
851913
:a _
"
"
350503
12/10/85
53.78
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300- 000 -00
854664
.5
35050312/09/85
_171..76.
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP_
GEN SUPPLIES
_ 40 -4504- 801 - 80_852700
'n
350503
12/09/85
191.21
SUBURBAN PLUMB
SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
851913
IH
11061.04 •
2.
* ** -CKS
2'
_3505Q5
_12/06/8.5
52.36
SUN
ADVERTISING
10 =4210- 140- 14.
22
350505
12/06/85
48.58
SUN
ADVERTISING
10- 4210- 140 -14
-,_ -.
23
2.
100.94
** *-CKS
I
2]
284._22
ST PAUL _BOOK
BOOKS-,
2II
350508
12/06/85
5.46
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 160 -16
_
2'
350508
12/09/85
2.86
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
33
_35 0 59-8
1,2/09/85
8.15
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
3_37297
350508
12/06/85
26.87
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 510 -51
-�
_
'`II
350508
12/06/85
7.58-
ST PAUL BOOK
CREDIT
10 -4504- 600 -60
33j__
_350508_
._- J2/10/85. _
292.22
ST; PAUL BOOK
OFFICE _SUPPLIES
10- -4516- 510- 51_,
'°
350508
12/10/85
17.19
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
23 -4504- 611 -61
- -_
3
�9
629.39
* ** -CKS
"
__350512 Y
1.2!10/85
70.08
S T ROBB
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 801 -80
1
+c
70.08 •
°-
..._._ ---
----- --- - - -- - -
n2
-
ffftft
* *
.-_
- ---- --- - --
-t- _CKS__
350516
12/09/85
99.00
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
170360
I,
_35051612/09
/85
54.06
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS -
10 -4580- 301 -30
049202
46
350516
12/10/85
49.95
SEARS RUE BUCK
LAUNDRY
28- 4262 - 709 -70
_- - - -- -
"'
350516
12/10/85
79.92
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 708 -70
48
350516
12/10/8.5
79.92
SEARS ROEBUCK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28-4504- 708 -70
"
350516
12/10/85
79.92-
SEARS ROEBUCK
CORRECTION
28 -4504- 708 -70
�I
350516
12/10/85
281.96
SEARS ROEBUCK
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
350516__
12 /09/85__
51.42
SEARS ROEBUCK
TOOLS
40 -4580- 301 -30
049246
s2
616.31 +
33
I
ee
tffttt
*** -CKS
"
350526
12/06/85
19873.00
TRACY OIL CO
GASOLINE
10- 4612 - 560 -56
1985 CITY OF EDINA
v�
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 14
2
3
19873.00 +
* ** -CKS
350530 12/10/85
253.00
TEXGAS CORP
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
15186
�a
253.00 +
-- —
e
*rr *rr
++ +_CKS_
—..-
"
350542 12/06/85
109880.68
THORPE DIST
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
?
«-------- _ -._ --
109880.68
43
„
......
* ** -CKS
350548 12/11/85
104.75
CITY WEST
PRINTING
23- 4600 - 610 -b1
104.75
v
GI
.r*fr•
* ++ —CKS
2
350551._,___ 12/10/85
110.50
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORMS
10 -4266- 420 -42
350551 12/10/85
19917.43
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
LAUNURII
10- 4266 - 421 -42
—
350551 12/10/85
168.15
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
LAUNDRY
30- 4266- 440 -44
=~
350551 12/10/85
_ 25.15
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
LAUNDRY
10- 4266 - 460 -46
6
* ** -CKS
20'
350553 12/10/85
67.47
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 322 -30
476711
°
350553 12/11/85
695.67
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 000 -00
483936
32
763.14 :
-
- -- - - ---
.__— - - - --
3'
-
fffr.f
-- - --
*f +-CKS
350569 12/10/85
335.78
VALLEY IND PROPANE
GASOLINE
28- 4612 - 707 -70
335.78
��
39
ifftrf
** *-CKS
3aD572 12/11/85
797.38
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES
50- 4514 - 822 -82
—
"'
350572 12/11/85
39184.25
VAN PAPER CO -
PAPER SUPPLIES
50 -4514- 842 -84
°2
350572 12/11/85
--
729.75
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES
50 -4514- 862 -86
,�
49711.38 *
- --
- -- -
_ 350513 12/10/85
61.23
MOSS
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 804 -80
22741
41
47
61.23 *
--
4e
4s
* *rsr•
5C
350575 12/10/85
76.23
WATER PRODUCTS
CONSTRUCTION
27 -1300- 000 -00
J50985
- - --
'
"
_ 350575 12/10/85
99.60
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
90- 4540 - 803 -80
52
350575 12/10/85
88.28
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40 –4550- 803 -80
J50551 —
__ _ --
53
350575 12/10/85
165.00
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
J50213
I54
350575 12/10/85
350575 12/10/85
120.00
300.00
WATER PRODUCTS
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
40- 4540 - 803 -80
J51157
J49815
95
56
849.11
V
v
1985 -Cl . OF EDINA
rurry Nn_ nATC AMn111UT
CHECK RL -.STER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 15
u c Ain n n T r c u n C C P O T T T R
-..
-
-
-_.-,_
• *•-CKS
'
350578
12/10/85
100.00
WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC
TRAINING
10 -4504- 560 -56
°
100.00
* -
8
350579
12/10/85
94.90
WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560-56
59451
°
350579
- -
12/10/85
--
54._10
WILLIAMS _STEEL -HOWE
WELDING SUPPLIES
10 -4610- 560 -56
60402
149.00
•
-_
-_ -- - - - - j
•z
•f•fff
* *• -CKS �
3
"
350587
12/11/85
102.75
WEIGLE SUE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 600 -60
i
"
102.75
17
f f f f f f
i
* ** -CKS
350590
12/11/85
100.00
HENRY WROBL'ESKI
POLICE SERV
10 -4100- 420 -42
20
2,
100.00
*
I
21
350591
12/11/85
60.27
CECELIA SMITH
MILEAGE
10- 4802 - 140 -14
2'
24
60.27
*
350592
12/10/85
311.00
MID CENTRAL FIRE
CLOTHING REPLACEMENT
10 -4574- 440 -64
16867
I'''
"
311.00
*
-;
i
f f CKS
I"
-
350,703
12/06/85
50.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 510 -51
50.00
*
-
-- - - -- -- -
X31
s
r_
3507- 04
a "2/06/85 -�_
21.00
21.00
NELLIE MCOUINN
•
REFUND
10 -2240- 000 -00
- -- -
- -- - - - - --
° l
-
350705__
12/06/85 -__
.8
943
GOPHER SHOOTERS
TARGETS
29 -4648- 720 -72
051792
94.83
•
--
- - --
I
12/_06/85
26.50
ICMA
BOOKS
10- 4502 - 420_42
26.50
*
-- - - --
- -
350_7-07 12/06/85
10.50
MN ASSOC OF
DUES
10- 4204_460 -46
'
44
10.50
4'
359./Of
/8.�
75.00
IAAO
DUES
10- 4204 - 200 - 20_653841
I'
°
1.7
75.00
*
ae
350709
12/06/85
95.00
GREATER MPLS AREA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 200 -20
sr
95.00
*
"___3507_]9
12/06/$.5
32.00
NATL AUTO DEALERS
DUES
10- 4204 - 280 -28
12
°°
35 p..j 11
12/06/85
32.00
136.67
*
AMERICAN TRAILER
REPAIR PARATS
10 -4540- 560 -56
269357
"
136.67
*
_J
7
19045000
MIDWEST WIRE 8 STEEL
GFN SUPPLTFS
�n- aSna- a9a -tn
anc�o
�.2.
350718
12/06/85
179.00
F & E SALES 8 SERV
SERVICE CONT
1385 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -16 -85 PAGE 16
350719
12/06/85
t
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGE
46.54 *
a
29045*00
�r lze
350720
12/06/85
15.00
' 350713
12/06/85
540.00
GEN REPAIR SERV
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 811 -81 20596
a
'
I'
MPLS JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
540.00 *
350720
,
20.00
350714
12/06/85
48.16
SUSAN MOORE
GAS MILEAGE
10 -2149- 000 -00
55.0 0 •
o
48.16 *
350721
'
565.00
350715
12/06/85
500.00
LAKELAND FLORIST
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 500 -50
12/06/85
v
SPRINGSTED INC
CONST BOND SALE
500.00 *
'i-
r
625.00 *
350716
12/10/85
234.60
RT W INC
CONT SERV
l0- 4200- 510 -51 1
350716
12/06/85
625.92
RT W INC
CDNT SERV
10 -4200- 510 -51
12/06/85
146.31
MAGNETIC CONTROL
REFUND
860.52
��--
- - -- - - --
- - --
�.
350717
12/06/85
850.00
JOSEPH L BARD
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 140 -14
12/06/85
lei
RADIO SHACK
CABLE TV
850.00
_2.98 *
4rl °'I
350724
12/06/85
�.2.
350718
12/06/85
179.00
F & E SALES 8 SERV
SERVICE CONT
10 -4288- 510 -51
Z'
179.00 *
350719
12/06/85
46.54
TWIN CITY ELEVATDOR
CONSTRUCTION
10- 4248 - 520 -52 8218 t
46.54 *
�r lze
350720
12/06/85
15.00
MPLS JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82 t
350720__-
__12/06/85
20.00
MPLS JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
50- 4214- 842 -84
350720
12/05/85
20.00
MPLS JAYCEES
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86 -
55.0 0 •
e
350721
12/06%85
565.00
SPRINGSTED INC
DUE HRA
1 - 1145 - 000 -00 - -
vi',
350721
12/06/85
60.00
SPRINGSTED INC
CONST BOND SALE
27 -4308- 660 -66 c
'i-
r
625.00 *
er'=I
350722
12/06/85
146.31
MAGNETIC CONTROL
REFUND
40- 3357 - 000 -00 e
��--
- - -- - - --
- - --
146.31 *
350723
12/06/85
2.98
RADIO SHACK
CABLE TV
10 -2149- 000 -00 t
_2.98 *
4rl °'I
350724
12/06/85
20.00
BRANDON DESHLER
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 460 -46 t
^?L_
--
20.00
L 14 350725
v " 350726
°^ 350726
12/06/85
12/06/85
12/06/85
ov
350727 _12/06/85
350727 12/06/85
350727 12/06/85
�4
350728 12/06/85
250.00
250.00
25.00
79.49
808 SOBCOVIAK SERVICES
MEMA TREASURER,
DOYLE LOCK SUPP
MEMBERSHIP
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4200- 610 -61
10 -4204- 460 -46
10- 4504- 460 -46 09702
408.00- INTERSTATE CORRECTION 10- 4508 - 421 -42 3
408.00 INTERSTATE PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508- 421 -42 3 -
408.00 INTERSTATE PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 421 -42 3
408.00 *
49918.54. HENNEPIN COUNTY ROOM B BOARD 10 -4286- 220 -22 1964
e
I' t
i,
i, •
v ,
s;
o �6<
350743 12/06/85 108.00 PRIMA DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 1448
108.00 + '
350744 12/06/85 21.52 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 - - -
21.52 •
350745 12/06/85 22.70 ICMA BOOK 10- 4502-140 -14 101703
22.70 +
1985 -,C. .
OF EDINA
CHECK RLvfSTER
12 -16 -85 PAGE 17
HECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
-
49918.54 *
° 350729
12/06/85
43.07
CURT FINCH
REIMBURSEMENT
30- 4266- 420 -42
'
e
43.07 *
I
7 350730
12/06/85
208.60
VIKING ID PRODUCTS
PRINTING
10 -4600- 510 -51
160339
v
208.60 •
° 350731
12/10/85
99120.00
CRAWFORD MERZ CONST
CONST
27- 1300 - 000 -00
" 350731
12/06/85
99120.00
CRAWFORD MERZ CONST
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300 - 000 -00
189240.00
350732
12/06/85
26.00
U OF M
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 627 -62
502909
5 - -- - - - -
,a -
- -- - - - --
26.00 •
- --
-
I.
%
+7 350733
12/06/85
402.50
PHYSIO CONTROL
SER AGREEMENT
10- 4226- 440 -44
!
402.50 *
2f 350734
12/06/85
40.00
FIRE INSTRUCTORS
BOOIKS
30- 4502- 440 -44
21
-- `- --`------ _.-
__....._ _- .---- - - - ---
40.00 *
1' 350735
12/06/85
39766.25
BRW INC
CONSTRUCTION
60 -1300- 177 -03
039773
=' 3507.35-
12/06/857
1.9650.00_
BRW INC
CONSTRUCTION
60 -1300- 356 -02
039637
5 9 416.2 5 •
- - -
-- " - __-
•
:a
27 _- _35073.6_____12
/06/85
- _121.00
- - - -
PETER JUHANS00�___-
--
_AMBULANCE REFUND
30 -3180- 000 -00
18 0
I ,
2N
121.00 *
- -
-
350 -737-
12/06/85
77.00
N COUNTRY FLAGS
6EN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
2572
I"
77.00 *
v"
350738. -_-
__12/06/.85 __
3.00
C 8 F KOERBER
REFUND
28- 3415- 000- 00_-
3.00 *
_ -._ - -_ - - -- -
a
„
-
12/06/85
180.00
U OF M
REG FEE
10- 4206- 490 -49
180.00 •
- - -- - -
"_- 3507- 4.0__- ._1.2/06/85
15 442._3 -9
SW UB CABLE COMM
CABLE TV_
30 -2196- 000 -00
.�
159442.39 •
- - -- --- -
------ - - - - -- -
v
<+
P '
^' _350741-
_12/11./85
312.41
STATE OF_M_N
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300262 -04
�•'
350741
12/06/85
231.99
STATE OF MN
CONSTRUCTION
60-046--262---04--3S917
_
- - - --
Cr
544.40
" 350742-
12/06/85
696.00
E H RENNER
CONT SERV
40 -4200- 800 -80
QV
47
°e
696.00 *
I'
s;
o �6<
350743 12/06/85 108.00 PRIMA DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 1448
108.00 + '
350744 12/06/85 21.52 AT 8 T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 - - -
21.52 •
350745 12/06/85 22.70 ICMA BOOK 10- 4502-140 -14 101703
22.70 +
350758
12/09/85 333.00 JIM HATCH SALES
333.00 *
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300- 000 -00 5516
�44 350759 12/09/85 179.02 VESSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-805-80 2006
179.02
v " 350760 12/09/85 448.00 HOWE INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 375 -30 50919
"0 448.00 *
350761 12/09/85 32.16 WHEELER LUMBER GUAID RAIL MATERIAL 10-4546-340-30 620756
- - -- -- - - -- 32..16 •
v " 350762 12/11/85 24.00 GAS SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64
350462 12/09/85 20.62 RENTAL EQUIP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 110695
7
0 -56 603419
I„ 4
�" A
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 -16 -85 PAGE 18
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE
'
350746
12/06_/85
50.00
ICMA
DUES
10 -4204- 140 -14
014472
,
r°
50.00
*
___ -__
- ...- _. - -_. -- . -_... - - - - - --
-
s
°
350747
_ 12/06/85
90.00
ICMA
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
012984
;
90.00
*
-
i•
y
e
°
--
350748
12/06/85
-
69.95
BUSINESS WEEK
SUBSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 140 -14
°I
69.95
•
- -
-- -- - - - - - --
-L350749
12/06/85
5.85
VECTOR ONE
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
5.85
*
------------------
"l
350150
12/06/85
36.00
CHESTER E GROTH
MUSIC SUPP
10- 4596- 627 -62
26240
36.00
*
350751
- - - - - - -- - --
12/06/_85
-- --
39764.00
FRANK B HALL 8 CO
INSURANCE
10 -4260- 510 -51
"
39764.00
•
-- -
- - - --
a.
350752 __
- --
- 12/06/85
116.62
- - --
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
�
2�
350752
12/09/85
203.35
NORTHSTAR ICE
- - - -
INVENTORY
-
50- 4632 - 842 -84
- - -- - -- - -- - - -- -
.�"
350752
12/06/85
193.55
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
513.52
�I =B
350753
12/09/85
205.41
FAIRVIEW COMM HOSP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
286264
4
12
-- - --
- -
205.41
vI}'i
350754
12/09/85
132.50
H L MOORE
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
-
f_c�--
- - - - -- --
- - - -- -
132.50
350755
12/09/85
269.85
LAKELAND FORD TRUCK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
3024
'
269.85
- - - - - --
- --
Gi,,
350756
12/09/85
288.00
CERT HYDRAULIC SPEC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
001117
4
�-
- -- - - - -
-- - -- -
288.00
*
i
b "
I"
350757
12/09/85
69.24
GUY METALS
PARTS
10- 4620-560 -56
8487
69.24
*
350758
12/09/85 333.00 JIM HATCH SALES
333.00 *
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1300- 000 -00 5516
�44 350759 12/09/85 179.02 VESSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-805-80 2006
179.02
v " 350760 12/09/85 448.00 HOWE INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 375 -30 50919
"0 448.00 *
350761 12/09/85 32.16 WHEELER LUMBER GUAID RAIL MATERIAL 10-4546-340-30 620756
- - -- -- - - -- 32..16 •
v " 350762 12/11/85 24.00 GAS SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64
350462 12/09/85 20.62 RENTAL EQUIP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 110695
7
0 -56 603419
I„ 4
�" A
c
a
t
N
1985•C_ OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
CHECK h- _STER 12-16 -85 AGE 19
*M(111NT Ilr NnnD rrr" nrcreT -vnel
l
2
a
350764
_
12/09/85
102.04
97.66
•
SATTERLEE
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
557892
°
'
e
97.66
*
'
350765
12/10/85
109392.69
STRGAR ROS'.OE
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 50.0 -50
e
o
109392.69
*
O
350766
12/10/85
39707.50
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 330 -30
850818 -
350766
12/10/85
79868.00
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 008 -12
851008
,2
119575.50
*
I
°
350767
12/10/85
39964.00
THE PREST COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
15
-- - - -- - - - -
-- - - - --
3 s 964., 0 0
"
350768
12/10/85
13.43
AMERICAN BAKERIES
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 704 -70
°
13.43
•
350169
12/10/85
52.20
DAIRY HOME
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624- 704 -70
21
- - - --
350770
-- -- - - --
12/10/85
52.20
290.00
GAS SUPPLYCO
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 707 -70
111410
?'
_350770
12/10/85
16.7_3
GAS SUPPLYCO
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 707 -70
111410
�s
2e
306.73
*
- - -
-- - - -- - - - -- -. i
84.80
BNLOOMINGTON RENTAL _
EQUIP RENTAL
10_4226- 540 -54
136168_
84.80
*
=
350772
12/10/85
759.00
WEHRMAN CONSULTANTS
CONST
10 -1455- 000 -00
759.00
*
- - - --
12
-- - 3507.73_ --
-12/10/85
7.36
COLLEEN PAULUS
MILEAGE
10- 4206 - 480 -48
i °�
7.36
*
-- - - --
- - -- - ---
35- -
12/10/85
803.00
HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL
KENNEL SERY
10- 4218- 470 -47
h
803.00
- _ --
I
-
65.90
E0 A SET HOSPILAL
SERVICES
10 4224- 470-47
C
65.90
*
-- -- - -- --
'2
_350776
12/10/85
15.00
NW CHAPTER
DUES
10- 4204- 420 -42
I.
12/I9/_85
194.82
ROBBINSDALE FARM
KENNEL SERV
10- 4218- 470 -47
47
184.82
*
-
/e
35077
12/10/85
120.00
P T A C
TRAINING
10- 4202 - 420 -42
li
"
50
120.00
*
I
'_'
__- 3507_79 12/1 -0 (�5
35_.95
LANCE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
I.
'2
35.95
Ir
12/10/85
296.88
SYANSON MEATS IN
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
296.88
IS
_12L1DL85_ _
95.00
T L D AUTO SUPPLY
RFPATR PARTS
In- L%Ln- SAn-SA
l
1985 CITY OF EDINA
f wrrK Nn- nATC AYnl INr
CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 20
urunno r:
' 350798 12/11/85 111.30 BETTY PEDDIE ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625 - 000 -00
..... _ ... . ........... ......
- - -
- -- - - - -- - --
- - -- -- -
- - -
,I2
95.00 *
350782
12/10/85
36.55
AM FREIGHTS SYST
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 318-30
I'
'I
36.55 •
350783
12/10/85
248.93
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
16 -6540- 540 - 54511191
-
8350783
12/10/85
18.73
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
511129
is
350783
12/_10/85
174_.84
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
350783
12/10/85
80.57
MINVALCO
REPAIR PARTS
50 -4540- 822 -82
511196 -
"'
121
523.07 *
-,
350784
12/10/85
19620.00
HENN TECH CENTER
DUES
10- 4202 - 440 -44
08384
1d1
�I
19620.00 *
B
350785
12/10/85
255.00
NATIONAL FIRE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212- 440 -44
853190 _
350786
12/10/85
255.00 •
160.00
TECHNICAL PUB
ADVERTISING
10- 4212- 440 -44
2C
160.00 +
350787
12/10/85
1859747.56
METRO HASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40 -4312- 801 -80
123
2a
350787
12/10/85
185,747.56
METRO WASTE CONTROL
SEWER SERVICE
40- 4312 - 801 -80
123
3719495.12 *
20
350788
12/10/85
266.04
-
ROCHESTER MIDLAND
CHEMICALS
- -- -
28 -4564- 707 -70
--- - - - - -- -- ..
12_'
_
266.04 *
2^1
350789
12/10/85
100.00
NATIONAL GOLF
DUES
27- 4204- 660 -66
100.00 *
132 350790
12/10/85
140.95
GENERAL BINDING CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 510 -51
125005
1 =1 I 350790.
-- 1_2/11/85
415.95
GENERAL BINDING CORP
CONT SERV
27- 1300- 000 -00
556.90 •
-- - - --
-- - -- - - - - -- -- ...
350791
-- - - -
12/10/85
-
467.10
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
10- 4600- 500 -50
026879
467.10 *
- - -- - -- - -
35079212/10/85
69116.00
GARY ARP
CONT WORK
60- 1300 - 012 -18
69116.00 •
- - - - --
-- - -- - - - -
42 350793
12/10/85
99.06
COPY DUPLICATING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
557011
4 3
99.06 •
-
-_ - -- ..
- 350794
12/10/85
5110D.00
PLBG 8 HTG REPAIR
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 010 -29
22803
59100.00 *
--
350795
12/10/85
59.98
DONALDSON
GEN SUPPLJIES
10- 4504- 500 -50
Sc
59.98 *
" - 350796
12/11/85
9.80
LOTS WILLS
ART WORK SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
L 2
5]
9.80 +
-
---- -- - - - - -- --- - -
'° 350797
12/11/85
6.30
MARY SUPPLEE
ART WORK SOLO
23 -3625- 000 -00
�a
6.30 •
' 350798 12/11/85 111.30 BETTY PEDDIE ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625 - 000 -00
..... _ ... . ........... ......
0,
1985 L
350799
35UBUU
350801
350802
350803
OF EDINA
CHECK i, .STER
P
12 -16 -85 .AGE 21
INV. # P.O. 9 MESSAGE
-
111.30
•
SANDY CLARK
CLASS REFUND
23- 3800 - 000 -00
3
e
350813
350807
12/11/85
16.80
23- 3625 - 000 -00
ART
12/11/85
4.55
BETTY OLSON
ART
WORK
SOLD
45.50
4.55
•
350814
12/11/85
240.00
JERRYS JLANDSCAPE
CONT REPAIRS
240.00 •
350815
12/11/85
189553.00
12/11/85
5.60
CLARICE OLSON
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
ART
WORK
5.60
23- 3625 - 000 -00
-
33
i
12/11/85
39.80
BARBARA LUNDGREN
23- 3625- 000 -00
ART
WORK
SOLD
JEAN ADAMS
39.80
•
SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
r,
12.25 *
12/11185
2.76
JUDY LUND
ART
WORK
SOLO
1,
23- 3625 - 000 -00
2.76
*
350810
12/11/85
7.70
ED SHIMEK
ART
WORK
SOLO
23- 3625 - 000 -00
JEAN HAEFELE
ART
WORK
SOLD
42.00 *
7.70
*
'
��uauY iuiaiaa 6.80 PAT 6REER ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00
Z` 6.80 + -
Z 350805 12/11/85 9.45 WALLACE FLANDERS ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00-
�'" 9.45
350806 12/11/85 5.60 JO FRENCH ART WORK SOLO 23- 3625 - 000 -00
,Ze 5 60 *
iF!
350812
12/11/85
49.50
SANDY CLARK
CLASS REFUND
23- 3800 - 000 -00
49.50
e
350813
350807
12/11/85
16.80
RAGNILD BERGSTOL
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625 - 000 -00
CLERICAL FEE
45.50
16.80
350814
12/11/85
240.00
JERRYS JLANDSCAPE
CONT REPAIRS
240.00 •
350815
12/11/85
189553.00
HOFFMAN ELECTRIC
PAYMENT
-
350808
12/11/85
12.25
PAM BONIELET
ART
WORK
SOLO
23- 3625 - 000 -00
-
33
.12.25
350809 _
~12/11/85
12.25
JEAN ADAMS
ART
WORK
SOLD
23- 3625- 000 -00
r,
12.25 *
E
350810
12/11/85
42 -00
ED SHIMEK
ART
WORK
SOLO
23- 3625- 000 -00
42.00 *
'
el",
35b811
12/11/85
34.55
MOLLIE PAULSON
CONT
SERY
23- 4200 - 610 -61
,z
34.55 *
..
iF!
350812
12/11/85
49.50
SANDY CLARK
CLASS REFUND
23- 3800 - 000 -00
49.50
350813
12/11/85
49.50
PAT RELOUK
REFUND
350813
12/11/85
4.00-
PAT RELOU%
CLERICAL FEE
45.50
350814
12/11/85
240.00
JERRYS JLANDSCAPE
CONT REPAIRS
240.00 •
350815
12/11/85
189553.00
HOFFMAN ELECTRIC
PAYMENT
-
8.553 00 +
350816
12/11/85
339811.34
C S MCCROSSAN.
PAYMENT
23- 3500- 000 -00
_1
23- 3500 - 000 -00 �-
23- 3800 - 000 -00
50 -4248- 841 -84 4081
I�.
7i 'l
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
' E
1985 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 -16 -85 PAGE 22
`_,
350825 12/11/85 227.50 ERIC ANDERSEN CONT S_ERV 10- 4200 - 500 -50
- - -- -
350825 12/11/85 36.96 ERIC ANDERSEN MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 500 -50
264.46 -
�' -i 350826 12/11/85 90.00 AFFILIATED EM SERVICES 10- 1224- 4T0 -47
-- - - --
w 90 00
HECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO.-INV. A P.O. p MESSAGE
I"
350827
12
26.57
VECTOR ONE
TELEHONE
339811.34 •
3
350817
350828
60- 2040 - 000 -00
12/11/85
1,958.b8
VICTOR CARLSO B SONS
PAYMENT
'I
11958.68 *
*
350818
12/11/85
19688.94
60 -2040- 000 -04 -
BURY 8 CARLSON
PAYMENT
79400.00
a,
MACH 8 EQUIP
27- 1340 - 000 -00 - --
19688.94 *
79400.00
*
350419
12/11/85
1639599.10
ANNANDALE SEWER
PAYMENT
60- 2040- 000 -00
-
INSTRUCTION
10- 2240 - 000 -00 -
1639599.10 •
162.00
*
42
350831
12/11/85
50.00
THE NEW LE BISTRO
350820
12/11/85
41233.34
RIDGED ALE ELECTRIC
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -00 -
i�i
49233.39 +
350832
12/11/85
114.62
DAYTONS
30821
12/11/85
53
54
D.L.R.CONSTRUCTION
60- 2090- 000 -00
869004.73
PAYMENT
I
55
350833
869004.73 +
15.00
VIDEO TRAINING
REFUND
10- 2035 - 000 -00 -
35
350822
12/11/85
691.00
JOHN NTLUND
- -
27- 4202 - 660 -66
NAT CONFERENCE
2
2.
691.00 +
2
350823
12/11/85
-- - -- -
255.00
- -- - -- - --
G.C.S.A.A.
27 -4202- 660 -66
- --
NATL CONF
350823
12/11/85
255.00
G.C.S.A.A.
NATIONAL CONF
27- 4202 - 662 -66
�2n
f
350823
12/11./85
_255._00-
G.C.S.A.A.
-- - -.
CORRECTION
7
27 -9202- 662 -66
255.00 •
_
- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - -
21
_-
30824
12/11/85_
.9300.00
HOLLENBACK
- 1300 - 000 -00
`_,
350825 12/11/85 227.50 ERIC ANDERSEN CONT S_ERV 10- 4200 - 500 -50
- - -- -
350825 12/11/85 36.96 ERIC ANDERSEN MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 500 -50
264.46 -
�' -i 350826 12/11/85 90.00 AFFILIATED EM SERVICES 10- 1224- 4T0 -47
-- - - --
w 90 00
- -- - ----- - - - - --
I"
350827
12/11/85
26.57
VECTOR ONE
TELEHONE
10- 4226- 420 -42
26.57
*
350828
12/11/85
18.22
HENN CTY DEPT OF
POSTAGE
10- 4290- 140 -14-
°'
18.22
*
350829
12/11/85
79400.00
VERSATILE VEHICLES
MACH 8 EQUIP
27- 1340 - 000 -00 - --
45
79400.00
*
ac -
350830
12/11/85
162.00
AM KARATE STUDIO
INSTRUCTION
10- 2240 - 000 -00 -
47
46
162.00
*
42
350831
12/11/85
50.00
THE NEW LE BISTRO
LIC REFUND
10 -3038- 000 -00 -
"
50.00
+
52
350832
12/11/85
114.62
DAYTONS
REFUND WINE LIC
10- 3038 - 000- 00� - -� -- `- " -` - --
53
54
114.62
*
55
350833
12/11/85
15.00
VIDEO TRAINING
REFUND
10- 2035 - 000 -00 -
35
15.00
*
- -- - ----- - - - - --
(1)
1
1995 C
OF EDINA
CHECK
STER
12- 16 -8'- GE 23
C HECK _NO.__DATE
AMOUNT,
_- .VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION-
ACCOUNT-N0.- INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE
®i=1
1
350434
12/11 -/85 - ..
15.00
SMALL- CHANGE CD____-
_- ____- VENDIPIG ,REFUND_- _- _- _____ -._10
-2035- 000 -00
15.00
•
350835_ _ _
12/11/_85
139324.05
____---- SHERIFFS DEPT -
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
139324.05
• - --
-- - - - --
'
1
350836
12/11/85 -
_ _ _ 220.00
_- - _---- _.- .,ASSOC PUBLIC SAFETY
_ ._ _ ,CONT SER11._- __- __ -_ - -- _._
10 -4200- 420 -42 3928
220.00
•
350837
12/11/85
20.50
ROBERT G CLABO
SUPPLIES
10 -3038- 000 -00
350837
1Z/1l/85
23.45
ROBERT G CLABO
MEETING EXPENSES ___
10 -4206- 420 -42
d!!
3508.57
12/11/85
18.95
ROBERT G CLABO
BOOK
10- 4502 - 420 -42
1
350837
12/11/85
12.71
.ROBERT G- -CLABO
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
350837
12/11/85
3.43
ROBERT G CLABO
FILM PROCESSING
10- 4508- 420 -42
'I
79.04
•
1
350838
12/11/85
406.63
STRGAR ROSCOE
CONSTRUCTION
60-1300- 002-12
'j
350838
12/11/85
184.80
STRGAR ROSCOE
CONSTRUCTION
60 -1300- 262-04
1
350839
12/11/85
336.75
ARID CONSTRUCTION
CONT SERV
40- 4200- 800 -80
1
336.75
•
®
350840
12/11/85
50.00
BECKIE ROGERS
DAY CARE
10- 4200 - 280 -28
50.00
•
1�
350841
12/11/85
400.00
RUTH ZIESKE
GOLF CAR
27 -1340- 000 -00
1
400.00
t
A
••.•r.
••• -CKS
1
2069037.29
-__ FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND__
19801.77
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
162.24
FUND 26 TOTAL
SHIMMING POOL FUND
339858.61_
FUND 27TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND_
119130.35
-_-
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
____- Computer checks ll's 67471 thru
S
457.99
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
X7734 Hhecks ed 66747 6hru
1
FUND 40 TOTAL,
UTILITY FUND
539078.49
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
-
r
3369205.21
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
79266.00
FUND 66 TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2
190359725.54
TOTAL
C
4
1
yl-
�
1
fV
1985 Cl
F EDINA
CHECK RL
TER
11 -30 -85 .,E 1
- CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT ,.. -._
VE4DO1
ITEM DESCRIP -T ION
ACCOUNT _ N0. ,INV.
4 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
302522
11/19/85
99248.96
AMOCI
GASOLINE
10- 4612- 560 -56
MANUAL
99248.96
" I
•rrrf•
•. *-CKS
i
305174
11/19/85
1509000.00-
1ST SOJTHIALE
BANK TRANSFER - --
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
305174
11/19/85
1509000.00
1ST SOJTHIALE
BANK TRANSFER
50 -1010- 000 -00
MANUAL -
I�
.00 •
°' i''
frfrtr
•* *-CKS
3D5430
11/19/85
199427.93
PE! RA
EMPLOYER CONT _
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL .
�I
199427.93 •
* ** -CKS
305523
11/19/85
89221.74_._ _ -T
SOCIAL- SECJRITY
EMP CONT
- - - -
10- 4149 - 510-51
MANUAL
l89221.74
•
--
- - - - --
I
--
I
lrkfrk
** *-CKS
_
303391
11/19/85
612.43
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252- 301 -30
MANUAL
3D9391
11/19/85
139108.43 _ _
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC____!__
10- 4252 - 321 -30
MANUAL
303391
11/19/85
99863.36
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
_
10 -4252- 322 -30
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
19849.41
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10 -4252- 330 -30
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
522.30
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10 -4252- 345 -30
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
93.05
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10 -4252- 358 -30
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
19836.63
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252 - 375 -30
MANUAL
306391
11/19/85
709.43
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC_
10- 4252 - 440 -94
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
42.00
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
-10 -4252- 460 -46
MANUAL
303391
11/19/85
19143.37
NORTH =RN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252 - 520 -52
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
19235.D9 _
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252 - 540 -54
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
825.07
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252 - 629 -62
MANUAL
'
309331
11/19/85
19811.67
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10- 4252- 646 -64
MANUAL
"I
309391
_ 11/19/85
56.71
NORTHERNY
STATES
_ ELECTRIC
20- 1130 - 000 -00_
MANUAL
308391
11/19185
402.98
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
23 -4252- 611 -61
MANUAL
398391
11/19/85
180.20
NORTH =RN
STATES
ELECTRIC
26- 4252 - 689 -68
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
755.15
NORTHERN_
STATES
ELECTRIC
27- 4252 - 661 -66
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
185.22
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
27- 4252 - 662 -66
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
49361.00
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
28- 4252 - 708 -70
MANUAL
3UB391
11/19/85
304.99
NORTH = RN
STATES
ELECTRIC
29- 4252 - 721 -72
MANUAL
309391
11/19/85
29186.52
NORTHERN
STATES
- ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 801 -80
_
MANUAL
'I
308391
11/19/85
169078.01
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 803 -80
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
16.97
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 804 -80
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
589.85
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
~ 50- 4252 - 821 -82
MANUAL
308391
11/19/85
813.47
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
50- 4252-841 -84
MANUAL
303391_._._.___11
/19/8.5
24.96-
NORTHERN _S
FATES -.�
ELECTRIC
_
50- 4252- 861 -86
MANUAL
599608.27 •
- -
- - -- -
,7 310415
11/19/85
69807.55
69.807.55 !
MED CENTER EMPLOYER CONT 10 -4156- 510 -51
* ** -CKS
MANUAL ,
• ** -CKS
CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -85 PAGE 2
AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
1.00
1745 CITY
OF EDINA
v
CHECK NO.
DATE
I
DISTRI
3.50
~
CITY
316067
12/05/85
"
315057
12/05/85
312.00-
315067
12/05/85
DISTRI
315057
12/05/85
CITY
316067
12/05/85
CAPITAL
316067
12/05/83
a,'1r
k�
316067
12/05/85
�31SOS7
12/05/85
��
315067
12/05/85
3.50-
316067
12/05/85
'4315061
12/05/85
CAPITAL!
316067
12/05/85
312.00
315067
12/05/85
DISTRI
315067
12/05/85
CITY
315067
12/05/85
CAPITAL
315067
12/05/85
316.00
316067
12/05/85
DISTRI
316067
12/05/85
CITY
31S067
12/05/85
CAPITAL
315067
12/05/85
3.55-
316067
12/05/85
DISTRI
315067
12/05/85
CITY
316067
12/05/85
v
316067
12/05/85
312.00
316067
12/05/85
DISTRI
316067
12/05/85
op
316067
12/05/85
CAPITAL,
316067
12105185
i
316067
12/05/85
Mi
.05
CAPITAL:
F
rrfkrr
971.55
r
CITY
DISTRI
4.90
315135
12/05/85
DISTRI
316135
12/05/85
r
316135
12/05/85
CAPITAL,
316135
12/05/85
19501.65 •
315135
12/05/85
<,I
315135
12/05/85
J.
316135
12/05/85
316135
12/05/85
rrrrrr
I
r i
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316136
12/05/85
ri^
316138
12/05/85
316138
_12/05/85
65
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -85 PAGE 2
AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
1.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
59.12
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
312.00-
CAPITAL;
CITY
DISTRI
315.55
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL!
CITY
DISTRI
312.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
312.00-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
316.00-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
316.00
CAPITAL:
CITY
DISTRI
3.50-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
315.55-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.55-
CAPITALI
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50-
CAPITALI
CITY
DISTRI
312.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
315.55
CAPITAL,
CITY
DISTRI
3.50
CAPITAL'
CITY
DISTRI
.05
CAPITAL:
CITY
DISTRI
971.55
CAPITAL,
CITY
DISTRI
4.90
CAPITAL,
CITY
DISTRI
13.50
CAPITAL:
CITY
DISTRI
128.43
CAPITAL,
CITY
DISTRI
19501.65 •
30.77 -
9.98-
42.48-
25.55-
19538.72
29124.15
499.00
19277.58
59330.67
.49-
18.36-
7.60-
16.28-
12.68-
7.30-
_ 24.01 -
30.04-
10-26-
EAGLE WIN=
EAGLE WIN-
EAGLE WIN--
EAGLE WIN=
EAGLE WIN=
EAGLE WIN--
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED PHIL'LI'S
ED PHILILI'S
ED PHI LILTS
ED P41LILI3S
ED PHIL1133
ED PHILLI33
ED PHILLI3S
ED PHILLI'S
ED PHIULI3S
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL ,
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
rrr —CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL `
50- 3710- 842 -84 --
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL ,
50- 3710 - 862 -66
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** —CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL `
-- ^ -- — — —-- -� -50- 3710 - 822 -82 —
MANUAL
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
_ _
50- 3710-842 -84�
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL c
V
1985 CI
F EDINA
28.74-
CHECK N0.
DATE
;F-
ED
PHILLIPS
15.85-
2I
316138
12/05/85
ED
PHILiLIPS
315138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
36.72-
316138
12/05/85
31.50-
ED
315138
12/05/85
ED
PHILLIPS
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
7.66- _ _
316138
12/05/85
23.71-
ED
315138
12/05/85
ED
PHILILIPS
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
943.91
316138
12/05/85
383.00
ED
316138
12/05/85
ED
PHILILIPS
316 13 8
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
918.00
316138
12/05/85
814.20
ED
315138
12/05/85
ED
PHILLIPS
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
510.00 -
316138
12/05/85
19436.95
ED
316138
12/05/85
ED
PHILILIPS
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
513.00
316138
12/05/85
19836.00
ED
PHILLIPS
12/05/85
ED
''�316138
316138
12/05/85
F'.
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
316138
12/05/85
PHIL'LI'S
316138
12/05/85
PHILLIPS
316138-
12/05/85
..�}'
~'
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
315138
12/05/85
'i
i
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
316138
12/05/85
315138
12/05/85
u
316138
12/05/85
315138
12/05/85
"
r
199999
316190
12/05/85
316190
12/05/85
316190
12/05/85 _
�I`'1
315190
12/05/85
�.;
316190
12/05/85
.
316190
12/05/85
°�
•
»I
999999
315271
12/05/85
315271
12/05/85
•''
316271
12/05/85
,.
315271
_12/05/85____._ "____
316271
12/05/85
• `
316271
12/05/85
CHECK RL ER
A40UNT YENDOI
36.72-
ED
PHILILIPS
28.74-
ED
P41LLIJS
18.88-
ED
PHILLIPS
15.85-
ED
PHILLIPS
10.20-
ED
PHILiLIPS
12.75-
ED
PHILLIPS
36.72-
ED
PHILILI3S
31.50-
ED
PHIL'LI'S
11.47-
ED
PHILLIPS
18.13-
ED
PHILLIPS
7.66- _ _
_ ED
PHILILI ,'S
23.71-
ED
PHILLIPS
7.60-
ED
PHILILIPS
19200.41
ED
PHILLIPS
943.91
ED
PHILLIPS
383.00
ED
PHILLIPS
380.00
ED
PHILILIPS
24.64
ED
PHILLIPS
918.00
ED
PHILLIPS
814.20
ED
PHILILIPS
634.00
ED
PHILLIPS
365.00
ED
PHILLIPS
510.00 -
ED
PHILLIPS
19436.95
ED
PHILILI3'S
19502.00
ED
PHILILIPS
792.25
ED
PHILLIPS
513.00
ED
PHILLIPS
19836.00
ED
PHILLIPS
19185.30
ED
PHIL'LI'S
380.00
ED
PHILLIPS
19836.00
ED
PHILLIPS
19575.00
ED
PHIL'LI'S
573.35
ED
PHILLIPS
637.50
ED
PHILILI2S
906.30 T-
ED_PHILLIPS
189959.86
11 -30 -85 E 3
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
4,380.70 _
MANUAL
T 50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84_______
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4528 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
- - -T - -�50
MANUAL
-4628- 862 -86 - -
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628-862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86 _
MANUAL
53.88-
GRIGSS
COOPER
AND
C 50- 3710- 822 -82
_87.61-
GRIGSS
CO3PER
AND
C 50 -3710- 842 -84
39.86-
GRI6 ;S
COOPER
AND
C 50- 3710- 862 -86
29693.81
GRIGSS
COOPER
AND
C 50 -4626- 822 -82
4,380.70 _
GRIGSS
CO3PER
AND
C 50 -4626- 842 -84
19993.18
GRIGSS
COOPER
AND
C -- - 50- 4628- 862 -86
89886.34
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
2.19- _
_ INTEAC34T'INENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
16.85-
INTERCDYTIVENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
10.63-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
109.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
842.51
INTERCONTINENTAL
-T_
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84 -- _
_
MANUAL
531.78
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1995 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -30 -85 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
N P.O. # MESSAGE
-, I'�
, 1x454.42 •
*r* * +•
- - - _.._.. ._
* ** -CKS
tl 315285
12/05/85
26.06-
JOHNSON
WIVE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
315285
12/05/85
39.24-
JOHNSON
WIVE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
315285
12/05/85
9.89-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
315285
12/05/85
9.36-
JOHNSON
WIVE
50- 3710- 862-86
MANUAL
315295
12/05/85
19303.35
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-i' 315ZR5
12/05/85
19962.32
JOHNSON
WIVE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
3162B5
12/05/85
494.93
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316285
12/05/85
468.44
JOHNS04
_
W14E
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
49144.49 •
1+
* ** -CKS
12/05/85
5. 3.2
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
1315433
316433
12/05/85
3.40•
PAUSTIS
_ _
& SONS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
31S433
12/05/95
143.44
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
1315433
12/05/85
323.12
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
X316433
12/05/85
8.40
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
316433
12/05/85
418.20,
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
31S433
12/05/85
10.50`
PAUSTIS
& SONS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
853.80 •
- - - -- - --
* *r ***
+ +• -CKS
316435
12/05/85
2.18-
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
315435
12/05/85
7.89- -
PRIOR WIN-- CO
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316435
12/05/85
109.20
PRIOR WIN_ CO
-50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
316435
i
12/05/85
394.30
PRIOR WIN_ CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
493.43 •
* *► -CKS
'I 316451
12/05/85
5.39 -'
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 822-82
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
2.27-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
21.11-
QJALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
8.47-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
` 315451
12/05/85
20.47-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
72.82-
- QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
29.92-
QUALITY
WINE - - -^
- -50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
1.31-
QUALITY
WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
12.21-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
10.56-
QUALITY
NINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
'I 315451
12/05/85
30.89-
QJALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
.14
_ QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
28.39-
QUALITY
WINE - - - --
-- 50-3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
26.36-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
610.80
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
65.94
QUALITY
-,
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
7.15-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
311451 _.-
12/05/85
19544.52
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 86'2 -86
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
113.90
QUALITY.
WINE
_
50- 46_8 - 822 -82
MANUAL
316451
12/05/85
1,055.50
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
e
+'
1935 Cl
F EDINA
CHECK RL
.ER
11 -30 -85 .E 5
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
316451
12/05/85
269.50
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
315451
12/05185
19491.35
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
39641.00
QUALITY WIVE
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
!'
31S451
12/05/85
423.80
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
I I-
315451
12/05/85
19023.75
QUALITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
315451
12/05/85
528.44
QUALITY WINE
--
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
w!"
315451
12/05/85
19419.85
QUALITY WIVE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
)316451
12/05/85
19318.00
QUALITY WINE
_50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
w
139229.27 •
-
'
*rr•►*
_
* ** -CKS
316540
12/05/85
8.03-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
2.53-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
316540
12/05/85
18.00-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
•
315540
12/05/85
9.34-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
7.00- _
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
36.92-
TWIN CITY WINE
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
316540
12/05/85
8.53-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
36.92-
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
316540
12/05/85
9.84-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
•,
315540
12/05/85
326.96
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
316540
12/05/85
304.55_ T
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
316540
12/05/85
775.30
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
304.55
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
663.76,..
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
126.87
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -62
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
350.22
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
315540
12/05/85
426.52
TWIN CITY_ WINE
-4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
i
315540
12/05/85
-__ -_
29878.51
_—
TWIN.CITY WINE
_ _50
_
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
69019.63 •
•�• *.•
* ** -CKS
dr
319174
11/19/85
1709000.00 _
-_ _1ST SOUTH)ALE
BANK TRANSFER
50 -1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
319174
11/19/85
179000.00-
1ST SOUTH)4LE
_
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
W
319174
11/19/85
179000.00
1ST SOJTH)4LE
CORRECTION
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
313174
11/19/85
1709000.00-
1ST SOUTH)ALE
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
i
••••••
***-CKS
! !
322702
11/19/85
124.00
HENRY WARIER
AMBULANCE REFUND
10 -3180- 000-00
MANUAL
322702
11/19/85
196.00
HENRY WARVER
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
MANUAL
322700
11/19/85
295.00,9
'.HAPOLD L LILJENQUIST
_ _ _
AMBULANCE REFUND -
10- 3180 - 000 -00
MANUAL
C ..'
35 an
I
*rrr*•
- --
-- -
- - -- * ** -CKS
!�.
vII,
322818.
11/19/85
247.00
ERIC ANJEASON
SERVICES.
10- 4200 - 500 -50
MANUAL
322818
11/19/85
28.52
ERIC ANDEISON
_
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 500 -50
MANUAL
�j
275.52 •
*** -CKS
322829
11/19/85
179171.44
RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -00
MANUAL
1985 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
a, 322829 11/19/85
,322829 11/19/85
f kif f*
323057
,
323067
R
ffffff
323095
323095
323095
323095
323095
i 323095
a. 323095
323095
323095
w
• ffffff
b i
323135
323135
q 323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
• 323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
323135
r 323135
323135
323135
rfff►f
14-
i
323138
323138
• 323138
I' 323138
r' 323138
323138
r
L
CHECK REGISTER 11 -30 -85 PAGE 6
AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION _ _ — ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
179171.44- RIDGEWAY CORRECTION 60- 2040- 000 -00 MANUAL
179171.44 RIDGEWAY PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 MANUAL
179171.44 • - .._
* ** -CKS
12/05/85 124.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL
12/05/85 3.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL
127.00
** *-CKS
12/02/85
156.38
COMM OFI R =VENUE
STATE SALES TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
145.97
COMM OF! REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
23- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
29499.62
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
21- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
19564.12
COMM 0; REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
28- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
141.21
COMM OF. REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
29- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
460.36
COMM DFI R =VENUE
_
STATE SALES TAX -
40- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
69538.11
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
50 -3357- 001 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
119680.40
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
12/02/85
109716.03
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
50- 3357 - 003 -00
MANUAL
339902.20
* ** -CKS
12/05/85
.15
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
2.02-
EAGLE WIN-
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
.04
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
12/05/85
16.73-
EAGLE WIN=
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
12/05/85
156.00-
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
12/05/85
1.97-
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
26.52-
EAGLE WIN:
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
18.00-
EAGLE WIN.-
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
.81
EAGLE WIN=
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
.70
EAGLE WIN_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
79800.19
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4626-842 -84
MANUAL
12/05/85
19326.18
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
7.42-
EAGLE WIN=
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
100.80
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
2.11-
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
12/05/85
836.35
EAGLE WIN_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
12/05/85
3.49-
EAGLE WIN_
_ _
- 50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
40.43-
EAGLE WIN_
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
900.12
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
12/05/85
98.70
EAGLE WIN_
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
109789.35 •
* ** -CKS
12/05/85
12.91-
ED PHILLI33
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
1.68-
ED PHILLI'S
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
7.35-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
12.91-
ED PHILILIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
12.91
ED PHIL+LI3S
_
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
12/05/85
12.91
ED PHILILI?S
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
!
1985 Cl
iF EDINA
CHECK R. !ER
11 -30 -85 .,E 7
:HECK ND.
DATE
AMOUNT _
VEN)OA
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
# P.O. 0 MESSAGE
-III
323138
12/05/85
12.91-
ED PHILLI'S
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
1.75-
ED PHILILI'S
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
41.76-
ED PHILIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
323139
12/05/85
51.06-
ED PHILLI3S
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
_ _ 72.61 -_
ED PHI LILTS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
,I
323138
12/05/85
11.18-
ED PHILLI'S
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
6.30-
ED PHIL�LI'S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
'j
323138
12/03/85
28.95-
ED PHILLI'S
- _
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
6.66-
ED PHIL!LI33
_
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
13.30-
ED PHILIL13S
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
i..
323138
12/05/85
39630.27
ED PHILILI3S
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/03/85
665.15
ED PHILLI33
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
r
323138
12/05/85
645.50
ED PHILLI13
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
84.00
ED PHILLI'S
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
645.50-
ED PHILLI'S
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
•
323138
12/05/85
367.50
ED PHILLI'S
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
_ 645.50- _ -__
ED PHILiLI3S
-4528- 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
645.50
ED PHILLI33
_50
50-4628-822-82-'--
MANUAL
•
'i323138
12/05/85
645.50
ED PHILILI'S
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
29552.90
ED PHILLI?S
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
29087.75
ED PHI LLI'3
_
_
- 50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
+
323138
12/05/85
87.50
ED PHIL'LI'S
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
323138
12/05/85
559.10
ED PHIL1133
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
(
323138
12/05/85
315.00
ED PHI LILT 33
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
r
323138
12/05/85
1,442.70
ED PHI LILT'S
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
323138
"
12/05/85
332.80
ED PHI LILI'S
- . -..
- 50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
129514.76 •
-
991199
* ** -CKS
40 �
323163
11/19/85
29205.00
1ST SOUTHIALE
DUE FROM HRA
10 -1145- 000 -00
MANUAL
323163
11/19/85
400.00
1ST SO'JTH)4LE
COST BONO_SALE
27 -4308- 660 -66
MANUAL
29605.00 •
999991
** *-CKS
w
323190
12/05/85
39.50-
GRIGGS CO)PER
AND C
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
323190
12/05/85
79.00-
GRIGGS C09PER
AND C
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
323190
12/05/85
79.00-
GRIGGS CO3PER
AND C -
50- 3700- 862 -86
MANUAL
323190
12/05/85
33.25-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
323190
12/05/85
.DD - --
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
323190
12/05/85
19662.52
GRIGGS COJPER
-- - - -- --- - - --
AND C
- -
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
y,
323190
12/05/85
.00
GRIGGS COJPER
AND C
50- 4626- 862 -8.6
MANUAL
,323190
12/05/85
.00
GRIGGS CO3PER
AND C
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19431.87
_
._. .
......
S
323354
11/19/85
475.37
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
10 -4254- 446 -44
MANUAL
323354
11/19/85
670.16 _.-
-, MINNEGASCJ
HEATING
10 -4254- 520 -52
MANUAL
11/19/85
19430.86
MINNEGASCJ
HEATING _ -
10 -4254- 540 -54
MANUAL
10 ;323354
323334
11/19/85
7 -45
MINNEGASC3
HEATING
10 -4254- 629 -62
MANUAL
_323354
11/19/85._- ._
___-- ..537.72 - -- _--_MINNEGASCJ
_ _
- HEATING
10- 4254- 646 -64
MANUAL
323354
11/19/85
103.41
MINNEGASCJ
HEATING
23- 4254 - 611 -61
_
MANUAL
9'
I
323354
11/19/85
19014.53-
MINNEGASCJ
CORRECTION
26- 4254 - 686 -68
MANUAL
C
89443.84 •
60.25
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
r
CHECK NO.
DATE
VEND02
323354
11/19/85
/ P.O. # MESSAGE
323354
11/19/85
HEATING
323354
11/19/85
�
323354
11/19/85
26 -4254- 689 -68
323354
11/19/85
MINNEGASC)
323354
11/19/85
MANUAL
323354
11/19/85
"
323354
11/19/85
154.28
.323354
11/19/89
40 -4254- 801 -80
*rr **r
323396
11/19/85
i'
323395
11/19/85
*,
323396
11/19/85
HEATING
323396
11/19/85
11.66
323396
11/19/85
50- 4254- 841 -84
323396
11/19/85
MINNEGASC)
323396
11/19/85
MANUAL
323396
11/19/85
p,
323396
11/19/85
323396
11/19/85
323395
11/19/85
-" -- -- -
323396
11/19/85
323396
11/19/85
323396
11/19/83
323396
11/19/85
323396
11/19/85
,323396
11/19/85
v
89443.84 •
60.25
*rrrr.
REGISTER
r
11 -30 -85 PAGE 8
AMOUNT
VEND02
323430
11/19/85
/ P.O. # MESSAGE
323430
11/19/85
HEATING
26 -4254- 686 -68
MANUAL
�
*rrrrr
V
HEATING
26 -4254- 689 -68
1323433
12/05/85
MINNEGASC)
(�h 323433
12/05/85
MANUAL
29698.17
MINNEGASC)
11►i
r*r **r
MANUAL
154.28
323435
12/05/85
40 -4254- 801 -80
323435
12/05/85
MINNEGASC)
323435
12/05/85
MANUAL
323435
12/05/85
HEATING
323435
12/02/85
11.66
323435
12/05/85
50- 4254- 841 -84
323435
12/05/85
MINNEGASC)
323435
12/05/85
MANUAL
323435
12/05/85
y
_
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
89443.84 •
60.25
CHECK
REGISTER
54.95
11 -30 -85 PAGE 8
AMOUNT
VEND02
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
/ P.O. # MESSAGE
19014.53
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
26 -4254- 686 -68
MANUAL
19014.53
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
26 -4254- 689 -68
MANUAL
90.54
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
27- 4254 - 662 -66
MANUAL
29698.17
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
28 -4254- 708 -70
MANUAL
154.28
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
40 -4254- 801 -80
MANUAL
19096.45
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
40- 4254 - 803 -80
MANUAL
96.51
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
50- 4254- 821 -82
MANUAL
11.66
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
50- 4254- 841 -84
MANUAL
56.73
MINNEGASC)
HEATING
50- 4254-861-86
MANUAL
89443.84 •
60.25
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
54.95
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
42.45
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
39813.51
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
404.29
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
107.28
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
49.65
NORTiW= 1ST =RN
BELL
150.33
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
24.40
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
320.78
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
454.54
NORTiWEiST_RN
BELL
47.98
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
131.25
NORTHWEST_RN
BELL
19029.12
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
137.42
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
180.43
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
130.25
NORTHWESTERN
BELL
79138.98
* ** -CKS
199560.40 PERA
.06 PERA
199560.46
252.60 PAUSTIS 8 SONS
3.00 PAOSTIS B SONS
255.60
13.28-
PRIOR
WIN=
CO
6.S1-
_
PRIOR
WINE
CO
12.53-
PRIOR
WINE
CO
4.43 -_
PRIOR
WINE
CO
35.16
PRIOR
WINE
10- 4256- 646 -64
295.33
PRIOR
WIN_
CO
626.35
PRIOR
WIN_
CO
_
221.71
PRIOR
WIN_
CO
.00
PRIOR
WINE
CO
** *-CKS
TELEPHONE _ _
10- 4226- 160 -16
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 460 -46
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
10 -4256- 500 -50
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
10 -4256- 510 -51
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
_ _
10 -4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 628 -62
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
10- 4256- 646 -64
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
23- 4256 - 611 -61
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
26 -4256- 689 -68
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
27- 4256- 661 -66
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
_ _
28- 4256- 708 -70
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
29 -4256- 721 -72
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
40- 4256- 801-80
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
40 -4256- 803 -80
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
50 -4256- 821 -82
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
50-4256-841-84
MANUAL
TELEPHONE
-
50 -4256- 861 -86
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
EMP CONT
10 -4145- 510 -51
MANUAL
EMP CONT
_
10- 4145 - 510 -51
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-" -- -- -
- - - - -- 50- 4628-842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
INVENTORY 50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_
50- 4628 - 852 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
t
e
4
1
r 1985 CI, r EDI4A
_HECK NO. DATE
(I
-I-'I
Q' 323451
323451
323451
'! 323451
323451
323451
323451
323451
323451
I' 323451
-I I323451
323451
d 323451
A 323451
1 X323451
it,
I' ,323451
1323451
Y 323451
323451
323451
323451
C 323451
323451
323451
323451
f 323451
323451
323451
323523
CHECK RE, ER 11 -30 -85 c 9
AMOUNT VEN302 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. # MESSAGE
19141.70
12/05/85
.08 _
QUALITY
WIVE _
50- 3710- 822 -82_ _
12/05/85
1.86-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
12/05/85
13.48-
QUALITY
WIVE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
12/05/85
2.37
QUALITY
WINE
_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82
12/05/85
23.15-
QUALITY
WIVE
50- 3710- 842 -84
12/05/85
7.88-
QUALITY
WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
12/05/85
21.31-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
12/05/85
12.39 - --
QUALITY
WINE
-- _.�.— _ - - - -50 -3710- 842- 84 -T.-
12/05/85
2.78
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
12/05/85
1.25-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
12/05/85
_
1.36 -
QUALITY
WINE
_ _ _ . _- -__
50 -3710- 862 -86
12/05/85
6.47-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
12/05/85
13.21-
QUALITY
WINE
12/05/85
.39-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
12/05/85
394.35
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842-84
12/05/85
19157.57
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
12/05/85
62.83
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
12/05/85
4.14-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
_ 12/05/85 _
674.45
_ QUALITY
WINE
_ 50 -4628- 822 -82
12/05/85
118.65-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822-82
12/05/85
93.00
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
12/05 /85
1,065.95
QUALITY
WINE
_ 50- 4628- 842 -84
12/05/85
619.73
QUALITY
WINE
50-4628- 842 -84
12/05/85
139.18-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
12/05/85
660.85
QUALITY
WINE
-4628- 862 -86
12/05/85
___
19.75
QUALITY
_
WINE
_ ___50
_ 50- 4628 - 862 -86
12/05/85
323.65
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
12/05/85
98.00
QUALITY
WINE
__. _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86
4,810.04
11/19/85 89180.32 SOCI4L SE :URITY EMP CONT 10 -4149- 510 -51
8,180.32 *
Jf
TWIN
CITY
.•}
323540
12/05/85
CITY
323540
12/05/85
TWIN
323540
12/05/85
12.61-
323540
12/05/85
WINE
32.86-
323540
12/05/85
WINE
62.66 -
323540
12/05/85
WINE
36.52-
323540
12/05/85
48.00-
323540
12/05/85
WINE
.15.90-
323540
12/05/85
1
323540
12/05/85
'1
323540
12/05/85
TWIN
323540 ____
_ __ 12/05/85
''
323540
12/05/85
" °
w ..
323540
12/05/85
6.02-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
2.33-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
6.92-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
12.61-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
32.86-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
62.66 -
TWIN
CITY
WINE
36.52-
TWIN
CITY'WINE
48.00-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
.15.90-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
4.22-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
8.17-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
18.54-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
23.74-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
19887 *87
TWIN
CITY
WINE
-� — 50 -3710- 822 -82 --
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 822 -82
50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
-- ��- - - -T T 50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50 -3710- 862 -86
50- 3710- 862-86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
_ 50 -_ 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710- 862 -86
50 -4626- 842 -84
f** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
L �
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
1985 CITY
OF EDINA
433.75
CHECK NO.
DATE
CITY
323540
12/05/85
TWIN
323540
12/05/85
346.22
323540
12/05/85
t,
323540
12/05/85
CITY
323540
12/05/85
TWIN
323540
12/05/85
19643.03
323540
12/05/85
WINE
323540
12/05/85
j
323540
12/05/85
TWIN
323540
12/05/85
795.46
323540
12/05/85
�
1323540
.I
I I
TWIN
12/05/85
I -.
999999
325095
12/U2/85
I_ I
�I I
t
ffrrff
408.89
°1
325522
12/02/85
I_ I
330055
12/02/85
33DO55
12/02/85
33DU55
12/02/85
33DO55
12/02/85
330055
12/02/85
330055
12/02/85
33DO55
12/02/85
yam'
330055
12/02/85
330055
12/02/85
330055
12/02/85
'r
f f t k f k
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/05/85
r
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/05/85
330067
12/02/85
�hl
t
ffrrrr
_
330129 -
12/05/85 _
330129
12/05/85
330129
12/05/85
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT
BRAEMAR
VElD01
433.75
19037.20
TWIN
CITY
DINE
116.80
TWIN
CITY
WINE
346.22
TWIN
CITY
WINE
301.30
TWIN
CITY
WINE
39133.46
TWIN
CITY
WINE
19643.03
TWIN
CITY
WINE
19826.15
TWIN
CITY
WINE
630.69
TWIN
CITY
WINE
795.46
TWIN
CITY
WINE
927.20
TWIN
CITY
WINE
211.45
TWIN
CITY
WINE
408.89
TWIN
CITY
WINE
129987.23 •
259.59 COMM )F" R =VENUE
259.59 •
89901.37 AMOCO OIL
89901.37 •
196.26
BRAEMAR
G)LF
433.75
BRAEMAR
GDLF
150.00
BRAEMAI
G)LF
25.00
BRAEMAR
G3LF
19.00
BRAEMAR
G)LF
262.00
BRAEMAR
G)LF
13.50
BRAEMAR
G)LF
22.00
BRAEMAR
GOLF
14.49
BRAEMAR
G)LF
31.48
BRAEMAR
G)LF
19167.48
21 -4290- 660 -66
PETTY
1.40 -
117.25
3.50
19311.69
25.00
917.77
14.50
78.75
29467.06
11 -30 -85 PAGE 10
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. 9 MESSAGE
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842-84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86_
MANUAL
-- - - - - -- - - - - "- 50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56
GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27 -4120- 663 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4120 - 666 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27 -4120- 667 -66
PETTY
CASH
_
ACCT
_
27- 4200- 660 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4204 - 660 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4206- 660 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4262 - 661 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
21 -4290- 660 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4508 - 660 -66
PETTY
CASH
ACCT
27- 4624 - 664 -66
CAPITALT
CITY
DISTRI
50- 3710 - 862 -86
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
- 50 -4628- 822 -82
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628 - 822-82
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628 - 642 -84
CAPITAL:
CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628 - 842 -84
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
50 -4628- 862 -86
CITY
DISTRI
50-4628- 862 -86
_CAPITAL
CAPITALI
DIST
_
INVENTORY
' 50- 4630 - 892 -84
19097.00- BELLBOY 50- 4626 - 822 -82
19097.75 BELLBOY - - -- -- " - - - - -- 50- 4626 - 822 -82- -
19097.00 BELLBOY 50- 4626-822 -82
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
*** -CKS .
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL !
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
!
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL t
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL 4
MANUAL
MANUAL
** *-CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL !
v 1
1.985 C1 iF EDINA
r.
CHECK NO. DATE
330129 12/05/85
AMOUNT
VE4901
935.00 BELLBDW
29032.75 *
CHECK R. !ER 11 -30 -85 iE 11
ITEM DESCRIPTION _ _ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. N MESSAGE
50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
* ** —CKS
0
a
C
i
-.
330135
12/02/85
2.53—
EAGLE WIN=
INVENTORY
50 -3710- 003 -00—
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
19.95—
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
86.03—
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
3.00—
EAGLE WIN=
_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
!•. 'i
330135
12/05/85
3.00
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330135
330135
12/05/85
12/05/85
35.82—
47.67—
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WIN=
_
_50- 3710 - 842 -84 _
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
3.00—
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
60.98 —
EAGLE WIN=
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
21.80—
EAGLE WINE
_
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
997.30
EAGLE WIN=
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
_x330135
12/05/85
29383.71
EAGLE WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
nl
330135
12/05/85
19089.97
EAGLE WIN=
_
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�O
330135
12/05/85
49301.60
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
19791.13
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
r
330135
12/05/85
144.75
EAGLE WIN-
_
_ _
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
'_►.''I
r
330135
12/05/85
149.75
EAGLE WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
"f
.330135
12/05/85
5.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�
330135
12/05/85
5.00-
EAGLE WIN:
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
— I
330135
12/05/81
144.75—
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
330135
12/05/85
39048.95
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
f'I
330135
12/02/85
261.70
EAGLE WIN=
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330135
12/02/85
126.63
EAGLE WIN-
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
139.872.86
*** * **
* ** —CKS
330139
12/02/85
.30—
ED PHI LLI13
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 003 -00
MANUAL
iQr
330138
12/05/85
10.56—
ED PHI LiLI33
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
I_
330138
12/05/85
36.60— _
_ ED P41LILI11S
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
6.20—
ED PHILILI ?S
_ _
_
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
17.20—
ED PHILILI ?S
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
14.44—
ED PHILILI3S
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
29.56—
ED PHIULI3S
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
06—
�
330138
12/05/85
17.57—
ED PHILILI23
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
9.16—
ED PHILL13S
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
0
330138
12/05/85
34.85—
ED PHILILI11 S
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
10.30—
ED PHILLI3S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
16.77—
ED PHILLI3S
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
'
330138
12/05/85
63.77—
ED PRILIL13S
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
® 'I
330138
12/05/85
5.70—
ED PHIL;LI3S
50- 3710 - 862-86
MANUAL
_330138
12/05/85
17.70—
E 0 PHILtI3S
_ _
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
'
330138
12/05/85
528.02
ED PHILiLI3S
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
A►I ")
330138
12/05/85
1,478.18
ED PHILiLI3S
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
19742.58
ED PHILILI3S
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
309.75
ED PHILILI3S
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
859.90
ED PHILIL13S
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
330138_
_ 12/05/85 _ _
_ _19830.05
_ED_ PHILILI'S
50- 4628- 822 -82_
MANUAL
'H
330138
12/05/85
458.00
ED PHILILI3S
_ —'
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1='
330138
12/05/85
722.01
ED PHILLI2S
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
b,
0
a
C
i
1935 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
11 -30 -85 PAGE 12
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
N P.O. # MESSAGE
330138
12/05/85
878.60
ED PHILILI2S
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
39188.55
ED PHI LLI'S
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
285.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
885.00
ED PHILLI3S
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
515.00
ED PHILILI23
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/05/85
838.56
ED PHILILIPS
-� _
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
330138
12/02/85
15.00
ED PHI LILI23
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
MANUAL
149243.62
`
fffkf•
• ** -CKS
330174
12/02/85
1759000.00
1ST SD'JTH)ALE
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
330174
12/02/85
1759000.00-
1ST SOUTH)ALE
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
F
.00 *
_
_ - - - - - -- - --
r•f•rr
**• -CKS
330190
12/05/85
22.42 - '
- GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
330190
12/05/85
2.30-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
330190
12/05/85
10.43-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330190
12/05/85
19121.05
GRIGGS C032ER
AND C
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
330190
12/U5/85
114.78
GRIGGS CO)PER
AND C
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
330190
12/05/85
521.67
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50 -4626- 862-86
MANUAL
I`
330190
12/02/85
79.97
GRIGGS COOPER
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 842 -84
MANUAL
19802.32 •
-
••• -CKS
i
x.330198
12/02/85
69334.21
GROU3 HEALTH
EMP CONT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
69334.21 *
- -.. _—
-- - -- - - -- --
i
•frfrf
- - --
._
•ff-CKS
t�
330435
12/05/85
10.03-
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330435
12/05/85
13.11-
PRIOR WIN= CO
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330435
12/05/85
5.50-
PRIOR WIN= CO
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
per'
330435
12/05/85
501.56
PRIOR WIN= CO
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
330435
12/05/85
655.52
PRIOR WIN_ CO
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
,330435
12/05/85
275.03
PRIOR WIN- CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
hp
19403.47
- -- - - -- -- -
•fr -CKS
330442
12102/85
119738.21
PHP
EMP CONT
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
119738.21 •
- _
- .. __ -_
r.f ff•
** ►-CKS
330451
12/05/85
42.60-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
.59
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822-82
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
2.45- '
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
.28
QUALITY WIVE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
.59 -_
QUALITY WINE
3710 - 822 -82__
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
20.00 -'y
QUALITY WINE
_ _
___50-
50- 3710- 822 -82
__
- MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
8.39 --
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1-985 Cl
iF EDINA
ti
CHECK NO.
DATE
11 -30 -85 iE 13
'I 330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
j I 330451
12/05/85
WINE
330451
12/05/85
44
330451
12/05/85
I'
330451
12/05/85
QUALITY
° 330451
12/05/85
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/09/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
1 330451
12/05/85
' 330451
12/05/85
� 330451
12/05/85
I��330451
12/05/85
\k330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
!-'•'"
r
330451
12/05/85
QJALITY
3 333451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
' 330451
12/05/85
k330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
'
330451
12/05/85
WINE
!�330451
12/05/85
w
330451
12/05/85
' 330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
ti
12/05/85
I'� 330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
{ 330451
12/05/85
330491
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
330451
12/05/85
1.51-✓
330451
12/05/85
50- 3710- 862 -86
330451
12/05/85
QUALITY
330451
12/05/85
MANUAL
330451
12/05/85
WINE
330451
12/05/85
y!!• 999999
330540 12105185
G° 330540 12/05/85
Y
i
f
I
1
CHECK RL iER
11 -30 -85 iE 13
AMOUNT
VE4301 ITEM DESCRIPTION_
ACCOUNT NO. INV-
# P.O. # MESSAGE
11.76 -J
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1.37 --
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
.59
QUALITY
WINE
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
21-00
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
.18 __QUALITY
WINE _ _
50-37I0-842-84__.______
MANUAL
13.63 -i/
QUALITY
WIPE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1.42- ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842-84
MANUAL
.35
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
2.94--
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
36.24
QJALITY
WIPE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1.19
QUALITY
WI NE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
11.21 -•✓
QUALITY
_ _ _
WINE
_
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
22.73 --
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
5.39 -✓
QUALITY
WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
.43
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
.07
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
19.29 - ✓
QUALITY
WIPE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
_
-' _
23.99 �- QUALITY
WINE -
_
50- 3710- 862 -86
- MANUAL
.42
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 662 -86
MANUAL
1.51-✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
.10
QUALITY
_
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
419.52✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
68.52 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
71.17 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
-- MANUAL
19812.10 ✓
QUALITY
WILE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
19199.63 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
80.67
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
39.64
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
- 29.64 -✓
-QUALITY
WIlE _
4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
.39.64-
QUALITY
_
WINE -'
_50-
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
19000.15 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
122.50
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
588.20
QUALITY
WIVE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
10.70 - -v
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
14.32- ✓ _
QUALITY
WINE
4628-822 -82
MANUAL
681.55 ✓
QUALITY
_
WINE
_50-
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
9. 23--`
QUALITY
WIVE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
147.00 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
560.75
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
59.28 ---"
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
17.90 -✓
- -QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
19136.55 L."
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
269.50 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
.00 _
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628-862-86
MANUAL
21.48 --
QUALITY
_ _
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
21.48 -✓
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
3.58 -✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
4.94 -V
QUALITY
_ _
WINE "-
' S0- 4b28-862 -86
MANUAL
964.79 ✓
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
69729.74 •
* * * -CKS
V 2.36-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
11.00-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
Y
i
f
I
1
- , ffff ►t
_ 330767 12/02/85
330768
1385 CITY
OF EDINA
39174.64 •
337067
12/05/85
CHECK REGISTER
12/05/85
337067
12/05/85
337067
12/05/85
t• f k f f
CAPITAL: CITY
I' 337129
10.20
ttfftf
11 -30 -85 PAGE 14
19085.55 f
CHECK NO-
DATE
AMOUNT
-
VENDOI
ITEM DESCRIPTION
- - --
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
p P.O. p MESSAGE
330540
12/05/85
15.67-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
i
330540
12/05/85
12.24-
TYI10
CI Tr
NINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
20.49-
TWIN
CITY
WINE —___
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
2.85
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
12.85-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
2.37 -_"
--
TWIN
CITY
_
WINE __- _- '� - - --
50- 3710- 842 -84 _
--
MANUAL
_
330540
12/05/85
2.45-
TWIN
CIIY'WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
50.79-
TWIN
CITY
NINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
13.55-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_
330540
12/05/85
2.05-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
31.51-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
I
12/05/85
9.03- "
" --
TWIN
CITY
_____ ----- -
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
- -50-
MANUAL
_
330540
12/05/85
42.91-
TWIN
CIiY
WINE
3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
F-
330540
12/05/85
28.02-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
42.06-
TWIN
CITY
WINE __
_ -__50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
936.52
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
29189.64
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
19455.35 — -
- -- TWIN
CITY
WINE - - - - -- - - -
-- 50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_.
330540
12/05/85
783.76
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
612.33
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
550.31
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822-82
MANUAL
_
330540
12/05/85
118.05
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50-4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
142.90___
TdIN
CIir
PINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
i
330540
12/05/85
118.0
TWIN
CITY
________..____
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_
330540
12/05/85
139.990
TWIN
clrr
PINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
677..94
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
642.85
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
e
330540
12/05/85
139.30-
TWIN
CIiY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
29103.38
TWIN
CIir
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
330540
12/0/85
451.60
TWIN
CITY
WINE - - --
- 50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
.
330540
12/05/85
19401.30
TWIN
CITY
WINE
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
330540
12/05/85
29145.93
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149033.10 +
_.
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
- , ffff ►t
_ 330767 12/02/85
330768
12/02/85
trffff
39174.64 •
337067
12/05/85
_ 337067
12/05/85
337067
12/05/85
337067
12/05/85
t• f k f f
CAPITAL: CITY
I' 337129
10.20
ttfftf
DISTRI - --
80.00
80.00 •
MN SDCITY OF CPA CONFERENCE 10- 4206 - 160 -16
39174.64
BROWV 8 CIIS
CONST
39174.64 •
457.08
CAPITAL CITY
DISiRI
7.80
CAPITAL' C[TY
DISTRI
610.47
--
CAPITAL: CITY
DISTRI
10.20
CAPITALI CITY
DISTRI - --
19085.55 f
12/05/85 19173.61
19173.61
60- 2040 - 000 -00
50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 822 -82
— 50- 4628-842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84 -
__BE430r 50 =4626- 842 -84
** *-CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
a
a
qb
4b
•
•
•
♦'
137.40 PAUSTIS & SONS
3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS
140.40 •
3.41- QUALITY NINE
170.85 QUALITY NINE
167.44
IER
11 -30 -85 oE 15
CHECK R.
-1985 Cl
IF EDINA
VEN301
20.27- _
ED
PHIL.LI'S
CHECK NO.
DATE
P41LL133
.84-
ED
PHIL;LI'S
3.24- _ _
ED
PHIULI33
337138
12/05/85
PHILILI ?S
337138
12/05/85
�•;`
337138
12/05/85
4 y
337138
12/05/85
i
337138
12/05/85
PHIULI'S
331138
12/05/85
P4ILLI3S
337138
12/05/85
PHILLI'S
337138
12/05/85
MANUAL
337138
12/05/85
337138
12/05/85
X337138
12/05/85
1„
rrttrr
*** -CKS
1439318.42
337433
12/05/85
GENERAL FUND
337433
12/05/85
56.71
FUND 20
TOTAL
rrtrrf
F
337451
12/05/85
FUND 23
337451
12/05/85
Hand typed
65656 thru
65679
19219.13
— _ FUND 26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
rrfrff
66890
337540
12/05/85
i$
337540
12/05/85
Ito'
12/03/85
FUND 28
337540
12/05/85
337540
12/05/85
Ib' j
I�
337540
12/05/85
1�i �
*rffff
f'-
219152.96
FUND 40
b� .. i
UTILITY FUND
1999399.63
Ala
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
�Ileif
4„
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
•
TOTAL
137.40 PAUSTIS & SONS
3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS
140.40 •
3.41- QUALITY NINE
170.85 QUALITY NINE
167.44
IER
11 -30 -85 oE 15
CHECK R.
AMOUNT
VEN301
20.27- _
ED
PHIL.LI'S
.69-
ED
P41LL133
.84-
ED
PHIL;LI'S
3.24- _ _
ED
PHIULI33
9.12-
ED
PHILILI ?S
42.00
ED
P4ILL13S
17.20-
ED
PHILLI3S
456.00
ED
PHILLI33
162.00
ED
PHIULI'S
19013.50
_ ED
P4ILLI3S
34.40
ED
PHILLI'S
19656.54 •
MANUAL
137.40 PAUSTIS & SONS
3.00 PAUSTIS & SONS
140.40 •
3.41- QUALITY NINE
170.85 QUALITY NINE
167.44
IER
11 -30 -85 oE 15
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.
N P.O. 4 MESSAGE
-- 50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842-84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4528- 842 -84
MANUAL
TWIN CITY
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
* ** -CKS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
* **-CKS
8.37-
_ TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
3.53-
TWIN CITY
WINE
_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
2.06-
TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
103.20
TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 4628-842 -84
MANUAL
176.50
TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
418.50
TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
684.24 •
- -- -
- - — - -
-- - - - -
*** -CKS
1439318.42
FUND 10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
56.71
FUND 20
TOTAL
Park Dept.
802.69
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
Hand typed
65656 thru
65679
19219.13
— _ FUND 26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
66858 thru
66890
59418.79
FUND 27
TOTAL
- -
GOLF COURSE FUND
--- ----.-...----.—__. -
99077.93
FUND 28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
494.18
FUND 29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
219152.96
FUND 40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
1999399.63
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
209346.08
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
4019286.52
TOTAL
/s