The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-05-07_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 7, 1984 7:00 P.M. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROLLCALL MINUTES of April 2, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by EDINA CITY COUNCIL EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Michael Lutz MINUTES of the Regular Council ,Meeting of April 16, 1984, and the Special Council Meeting of April 23, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improve- ment has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Tree Trimming Improvement No. P -TT -02 Area bounded by Highway 100 on the West, 50th Street on the North, eastern City boundary line on the East and the southern City boundary line on the South. B. Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. P -L -25 Between 6209 -6217 Parnell Avenue II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department.. Spectators heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Flood Plain Permits, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Preliminary Plat 1.. Gustafson Replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills - Generally located west of Indian Hills Road and north of Dakota Trail B. Zoning Change 1. First Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to Mixed Development District 5 Edinborough - Generally located south of 76th Street and west of York Avenue C. Lot Divisions 1. Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls Cougar Addition - Generally located at 5209 -11 Malibu Drive 2. Lot 4, Block 1, The Habitat-- Generally located at 6101 -03 Waterford Ct. D. Final Plat Approval 1. Muir Woods - Generally located west of Valley View Road and west of Mark Terrace Drive extended 2. Normandale Bluffs - Generally located west of Rolf Avenue and south of W. 64th Street 3. Dewey Hill Fourth Addition (Continue) E. Set Hearing Date 1. Preliminary Plat - Miller Addition - Generally located west of Dearborn Street and North of Belmore Lane (5/21/84) III. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET AND EASEMENT VACATIONS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department or Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Street Vacation - Part of Garden Avenue B. Drainage and Utility Easement Vacation - Lot 5 and 6, Block 1, Oak Ridge C. Street Vacation - Summit Avenue (Contd from 4/16/84) IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS Agenda Edina City Council May 7, 1984 Page Two V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Tree Trimming - Improvement No. P -TT -02 1 B. Weed - Harvesting - ;Mirror Lake and Mill Pond VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Set Hearing Date 1. Vacation of Water Storage Easement - Lot 2, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third Addition 6/4/84) 2. Petition for Ornamental Street Light - Corner of Ashcroft Lane and 63rd Street (6/4/84) B. Petition for Watermain, Storm Sewer, Sanitary Sewer, Graveling, Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb and Gutter - Mendelssohn 2nd Addition C. Feasibility Report #84 -2 - Set Hearing Date (5/21/84) 1. P -BA -262 Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb and Gutter and Bridge Replacement - W. 44th Street from Soo Line Railroad to T.H. 100 2. P- AQ -84 -3 Weed Harvesting - Indianhead Lake D. On -Sale Beer License - Normandale Golf, Inc. E. Evan R. Meineke - Special Assessment F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. Sixth Annual All Volunteers' Awards Reception - 5/8/84 VII. RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution - Private Sale VIII. FINANCE:.. ...:. A. Claims Paid. Motion of , was seconded by for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List of 5/7/84: General Fund $133,851.75, Park Fund $20,645.27, Art Center $8,976.46, Swimming Pool Fund $7,9.40.00, Golf Course Fund $28,357.33, Recreation Center Fund $3,702.26, Gun Range Fund $99.99, Waterwork Fund $20,919.27, Sewer Rental Fund $1,250.39, Liquor Dispensary Fund $12,455.55, Construction Fund $1,884.81, Total $240,083.18 EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES April 2, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Schmidt, and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of December 5, 1983, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Bredesen, seconded by Member Schmidt. Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Courtney Motion carried. No further business appearing, the meeting was adjourned. Gordon L.`Hughes Executive Directo MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 16, 1984 Answering rollcall were members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. BIKE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAIMED. Mayor Courtney read the following proclamation: BICYCLE SAFETY WEEK PROCLAMATION As Mayor of the City of Edina, I call upon all members of this community to give their wholehearted support to the 21st Annual Edina Bicycle Safety Program which has traditionally been sponsored under the united efforts of various Edina civic organizations. The purpose of the Program is to reduce the hazard of bicycle riding for young bicyclists, as well as for pedestrians and motorists. The growing congestion of our streets and highways daily increases the dangers for the careless or unskilled rider. Reports of hundreds of deaths and thousands of injuries each year throughout our nation (due to collisions between bicycles and motor vehicles alone) have alerted us to the need for such a Program. By training our boys and girls, at an early age, in proper riding skill, by teaching them the laws govern- ing bicyclists, by explaining the reasons for obeying safety rules and by helping them to be aware of the hazards of biking, we feel that Edina is making a concerted attempt to assure that the number of accidents does NOT keep up with the ever - increasing number of bicyclists. The energy crisis may even now be creating the need for our adults to use their bicycles as a means of transportation for short haul errands. It behooves us all to become thoroughly familiar with the "rules of the road" to minimize the incident of accidents. We should all remember that a bike is no longer just a toy, but a vehicle to be taken seriously. The safety of our children cannot be relegated to a once -a -year campaign. I call for the support of every parent in carrying out this campaign all year long and I urge every youngster to participate in this Bicycle Safety Program and then to practice what he has learned - for his safety as well as for the safety of others. As Mayor of Edina, I hereby proclaim the week of April 23rd to be Bicycle Safety Week and April 28th to be Bicycle Safety Day in the City of Edina. PROCLAIMED this 16th day of April, 1984. MARY NELSON AND PATRICIA MARR RECOGNIZED. Assistant City Manager Bernhardson introduced Mary Nelson and Patricia Marr advising that they both work in the Finance Department. Patricia Marr has been employed by the City since June of 1969 and is responsible for input of financial data into the .computer, including journal entries and monthly reports and also is responsible for ambulance billings. Mary Nelson has been with the City since July of 1972 and is an accountant and internal auditor. She is responsible for preparation of financial statements for various funds, for payroll and sales tax returns and year end statements. Mr. Bernhardson commended them for their dedication and loyal service to the City and presented them with silver pens bearing the City logo. Members of the Council also extended their appreciation and commendations. MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of April 2, 1984, and the Special Council Meeting of April 9, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Schmidt, seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONTINUED HEARING OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -ST.S. -173 CONDUCTED; PROJECT AUTHORIZED. Engineer Hoffman recalled that at the Council Meeting of March 19, 1984, a public hearing was conducted on a proposed Storm Sewer Improvement No. P -ST.S. -173, for the area of the Edina - Bloomington Border - Highway 100, and that the Council had discussed methods of financing the project. The hearing was then continued to this date and staff was instructed to develop a specific proposal using the Chapter 429 method of financing (special assessment based on square feet and type of development) when more facts are known as to what the City of Bloomington is going to do. Mr. Hoffman then reviewed the proposed project, pointing out the areas proposed to be assessed and showing graphics illustrating the existing storm sewer system and proposed storm sewer in the area. He advised that a storm water management plan has been prepared for the area of Bloomington and Edina lying north of I -494 and between Normandale Boulevard and Xerxes Avenue. This plan recommends the construction of a 138" x 88" reinforced concrete pipe -arch along the south city limits from Normandale Boulevard to approximately 2500 feet east to decrease the chances of substantial flooding in the area. The existing ponding area would remain easterly of that point. A revised preliminary cost estimate of the proposed work is $1,435,779.70 which is proposed to be shared equally by Edina and Bloomington, with Edina's share in the 4/16/84 amount of $717,944.85. Under Chapter 429 of the State Code the costs of the project are proposed to be assessed against owners of benefitted properties based on square feet of property and type of existing or anticipated development on said.property.. Mr. Hoffman presented proposed rates of assessment as follows per map on file: Sub Area 1: 1 cent per square foot for single residential property 12 cents per square foot for multi - family property 2 cents per square foot for office /industrial property Sub Area 2: 8 cents per square foot 5 cents per square foot extraordinary benefit area Sub Area 3: 2 cents per square foot for multi - family property 4 cents per square foot for office /industrial property The general area proposed to be assessed includes an area bounded by Highway 100 on the west, Richfield border on the east, Bloomington border on the south and on the north starting at Highway 100 proceeding along West Shore Drive to Hibiscus to Gilford Drive, north along Oaklawn Avenue thence easterly along W. 72nd Street extending easterly to the Richfield border. John Sheedy, 4940 Viking Drive, stated he was representing Pentagon Associates and that after reviewing the proposed project and assessment the owners have decided not to oppose the project, but could see no direct benefit and questioned the method of the proposed assessment. Mr. Sheedy requested that there be.a review and some.consideration in the method that has been set for determining how many cents per square foot are going to be assessed against their properties. He asked that the record show that they do not agree at this time with the proposed assessment and reserve the right to discuss their benefits with Council at the assessment hearing. Bill Roberts, 4401 W. 76th Street, representing National Computer Systems, stated they would also like to have a review of the assessment rate structure, that the net benefits to National Computer Systems is nil, and asked that the record show that they are opposed to the assessment rates as proposed. Bill Zucco, 7700 France Avenue, representing National Car Rental, pointed out that when their pro- perty was developed 3 years ago, at the request of the City approximately eight per cent of their land was set aside for storm water purposes. He stated that having made that contribution of land they consider the proposed assessment unfair and would look to the Council for relief. Tom Kelly, 7450 France Avenue, representing Wausau Insurance, stated that inasmuch as they have owned and operated a building they have paid their assessment for the storm sewer and that the benefit of the project would be for the owners of the undeveloped land. He questioned the way the assessment sub areas were divided and voiced his objection. No further comment being heard, Member Bredesen stated that though comments were made about the proposed assessment, no one indicated the project was not needed and offered the following resolution, moving its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -173 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore cuased notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improve- ment: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -173 IN THE FOLLOWING: Edina - Bloomington Border - Highway 100 - Easterly 2500 Feet Plus or Minus and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and mainte- nance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as follows: STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -173 and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include: Lots 1 thru 34, 39, 45, 46; 47, Blk. 1; Lots 1 thru 26, Blk. 2; Lots 1 and 3, Blk. 3, Oscar Roberts First Addition; Outlot 1 and 2, Lots 1 thru 11, Blk. 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Blk. 2; Lots 1 and 2, Blk. 3, Bertelsen 3rd Add'n.; Tract A and B, R.L.S. 1270, Apt. Ownership No. 88, Heatherton of Edina Condo; Lots 1 thru 3, Blk. 1, Hedberg Parklawn 1st Add'n.; Tracts C thru J, M, and N, R.L.S. No. 1129; Lots 1 thru 3, Blk. 1, Edina Office Center; Lots 1 and 2, Blk. 1, Edina Office Center 2nd Addition; Tracts A thru M, P thru S, R.L.S. No. 1218;, Tracts B thru S, R.L.S. No. 1050; Tract A, R.L.S. No. 679; Lots 7 thru-13, Blk. 2; Lots 1 thru 7, Blk. 3; Lots 3 thru 8, Blk. 4, Lake Edina 4th Add'n.; Tract A, R.L.S. No. 938; Lots 1 thru 13, Blk. 3, Lake Edina 3rd Add'n.; Lots 4 thru 6, Lake Edina 5th Add'n.; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Yorkdale Townhomes of Edina; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Outlot A, Ebenezer Society 1st Add'n.; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Al Johnson Add'n.; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Paul Klodt First Add'n.; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Northwestern Financial Center; Lot 1, Blk. 1, Eden Place; Parcel 800, 1200, 2802, 2850; 4800, 6000, 6800, 6400, 8000, 9210, and 2400, Section 32 Township 28, Range 24. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 4/16/84 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for Mendelssohn 2nd Addition, generally located south of Belmore Lane and west of Griffit Street. He advised that the subject property measures approximately 2.7 acres in area and is zoned R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is presently composed of four parcels. Three of these parcels front on Belmore Lane and are developed with single dwelling buildings. The fourth parcel is landlocked and vacant. The proponent is requesting a replatting of the property into a total of eight lots. Four of these lots would front on Belmore Lane and four would front on the northerly extension of the Arthur Street cul de sac. Three of the Belmore Lane lots would contain the three existing homes. The remaining five lots would re- present new building sites. The proposed lots range in area from 10,100 square feet to 16,300 square feet, with the average about 13,400 square feet. Mr. Hughes stated that all lot dimensions exceed the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. Two of the three existing dwellings now maintain non - conforming set- backs from Belmore Lane; all other setbacks comply with the Ordinance. The only identified physical constraint affecting the property is storm water drainage. The southerly part of the property is low and collects drainage from surrounding properties. A preliminary review of the plat by the Engineering Department shows that the westerly extension between Lots 7 and 8 of an existing storm sewer_ will provide proper drainage. Staff believes that the proposed subdivision represents a proper development of the property. Lot sizes are generally con- sistent with other lots in the vicinity and comply with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. The property could be served by a cul de sac from Belmore Lane rather than from an extention of Arthur Street but would have several dis- advantages. In staff's view the proposed access to the site from the south is the most efficient method of serving the property. Mr. Hughes advised that the Community Development and Planning Commission had considered the proposed sub- division at its meeting of March 28, 1984, and had agreed that the proposal with the northerly extention of Arthur Street represented the best develop- ment of the property and therefore recommended approval subject to subdivision dedication and a Developer's Agreement including the proposed storm sewer extension between Lots 7 and 8. Robert Anderson, 413 Arthur Street, stated he was concerned about drainage from the proposed subdivision onto his lot. He also stated that when he bought his home in.1963 there was no sewer and he had to pay for a sewer extention from Griffit Street. It was also agreed at that time that should a larger sewer be constructed to accomodate future development that there would be some consideration for having to pay the entire cost for. the sewer in 1963. Mr. Hughes responded that a preliminary grading plan for the subdivision has been submitted and that a Developer's Agreement would need to be signed before final plat approval, which would provide for adequate grades to insure that drainage would flow to the new storm sewer. With regard to the 1963 sewer agreement, Mr. Hoffman stated that Mr. Anderson's comments are now of record and he would check into the matter. Bob Kilgore, 404 Griffith Street, asked who would pay for the storm sewer extention. Mr. Hoffman advised that the developer would be required to pay for all costs for development of the property. No further comment being heard from the public, Member Turner commented that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the size of other lots in the area and moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR MENDELSSOHN 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled " Mendelssohn 2nd Addition ", platted by Fred G. Braun and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 16, 1984, be and is . Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt setting May 7, 1984, as hearing date for rezoning from R -1 District to Mixed Development District for Edinborough, generally located south of W. 76th Street and west of York Avenue. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET FOR STREET VACATION /PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 4/16/84 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provi- sions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: All that part of Lincoln Drive adjoining Block 1, Outlot A, and Lot 2, Block 2, all in INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1., in said Block 1; thence South 77 degrees 07 minutes 56 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 227.31 ;feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1, being the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 0 degrees 11 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 92.00 feet; thence South 52 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 14.04 feet to the westerly line of said Lincoln Drive and there terminating. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 2. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to pose such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in sutstantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on May 21, 1984, at 7 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following street: All that part of Lincoln Drive adjoining Block 1, Outlot A, and Lot 2, Block 2, all in INTERLACHEN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, which lies southerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northeast corner of Lot 1, in said Block 1; thence South 77 degrees 07 minutes 56 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the northerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 227.31 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 1, being the point of beginning of the line being described; thence South 0 degrees 11 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 92.00 feet; thence South 52 degrees 25 minutes 51 seconds West, a distance of 14.04 feet to the westerly line of said Lincoln Drive and there terminating. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed vacation of street affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person., corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 4/16/84 PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF SUMMIT AVENUE CONTINUED TO 5/7/84. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman presented the petition for vacation of Summit Avenue, which is a one -way street going south from Interlachen Boulevard to Vernon Avenue, advising that the request is being submitted to permit construction of eight townhouses, five of which would be sited on the west side of Summit Avenue of which one would be located on the Summit Avenue right of way. Staff has reviewed the request to vacate Summit Avenue and believes that it is not necessary to maintain it as a public street and would recommend vacation of Summit Avenue including the easement over the west 6 feet of Lots 30, 31 and 32, Block 3, Grand View Heights which the City has retained for park and landscaping purposes. Mr. Hoffman noted that Northern States Power Company has requested there be reserved a 10 -foot utility easement along the east side to protect an existing pole line. Also, Minnegasco has requested there be reserved a utility easement over the west 20 feet of that part of Summit Avenue lying adjacent to Lot 1, Block 4, Grand View Heights. For the remainder of Summit Avenue, adjacent to Lots 6, 7 and 29, it is recommended that either: 1) the remainder of Summit Avenue be vacated and all three property owners enter into a common usage agreement as a private roadway, or 2) if made part of the vacation request for the townhouse project that the owners would be responsible for the routine maintenance thereof. The vacation would be granted subject to a building permit being issued for the townhouse project. Member Bredesen asked if the recommendations had been discussed with the property owners Affected. Mr. Hoffman stated that no comment has been heard from them. Member Richards questioned why the City should vacate the roadway as opposed to selling the land to the developer, stating that to vacate would be making a public contribution to the developer. Attorney Erickson clarified-that in Edina it has been the practice when a street is vacated that one half of the roadway is added to the land of the adjoining property owners. He stated further that if the remainder of Summit Avenue is vacated it would be preferable that the property owners enter into a common usage agreement as a private roadway. Stating that he felt any action at this time would be premature and that the property owners should be contacted regarding the common usage agreement recommendation, Member Richards moved that the hearing on the request for vacation of Summit Avenue be continued to the Council Meeting of May 7, 1984. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REQUEST FOR VACATION OF AMUNDSON AVENUE DENIED. Affidavits of Notice were pre- sented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hoffman presented the request for vacation of Amundson Avenue within the plat of William Wardwell Lewis Park Addition, advising that the request was made by the owner of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, William Wardwell Lewis Park Addition. The Amundson Avenue roadway has not been constructed. The request is made for the purpose of adding the west one -half of the roadway easement to the land area of the adjoining Lots 1 and 2, Block 1. Mr. Hoffman stated that there are no existing utility easements on the Amundson Avenue right of way. The City does maintain a pathway on the right of way which the Park Department intends to improve as some point in the future. Also, the right of way may be needed for road access to future parking areas. Staff therefore concluded that vacation of Amundson Avenue within the plat of William Wardwell Lewis Park Addition would not be in the best interests of the City and recommends against vacation. No public comment being heard, Member Schmidt moved to deny the request for vacation of Amundson Avenue, as recommended by staff. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONCERNS OF 44TH STREET RESIDENTS HEARD. Mr. Bernhardson advised that the staff has been considering improvements -on-,.44th Street, particularly toward the Brookside Avenue end. No definitive design has'been determined and staff is looking at several alternatives, both in funding and design. The residents of 44th Street have become very aware of the project and have circulated a petition throughout the neighborhood. It is recommended that the Council accept the petition at this point, but that no action be taken. Kathy Stiehm, 4520 West 44th Street, presented a petition to the Council signed by approximately 200 persons, requesting that the plans for improve- ments of W. 44th Street be limited to the following: 1) maintain current width with no widening - no tree removal, 2) present bridge be left as it is or replaced as required to meet health and safety standards but no wider than the present street, and 3) consider preparation of plans for,,a pedestrian walkway adjacent to the bridge if such a plan is consistent with health and safety standards. Speaking in support of the petition were: Carol Schults, 4390 Collidge Avenue and Tom Bonneville, 4378 Browndale Avenue. Mayor Courtney directed that the petition be given to the Clerk and assured the residents that before any improvements would be considered a public hearing would be held so that input could be obtained from the residents. No formal action was taken. 4/16/84 BIDS FOR DEEP WELL #9 OVERHAUL REJECTED. Mr. Bernhardson recalled that at the Council Meeting of April 2, 1984, the award of bids for overhaul of Deep Well #9 had been continued to this meeting. Because there was a problem in understanding the bowl specifications, staff would recommend that the bids submitted be rejected and that the Council direct the project be rebid. Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen, to reject the bids submitted for overhaul of Deep Well #9 and directing that the.project be rebid. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BIDS FOR TREE TRIMMING PROJECT REJECTED. Mr. Bernhardson stated that at the Council Meeting of April 2, 1984, the award of bids for Tree Trimming had been continued to this meeting. Staff would recommend that the bids submitted be rejected and that the Council direct the project be rebid for these reasons: 1) because the hearing date for the Tree Trimming Improvement has been set for May 7, 1984, the period of validity of the bids submitted has expired, and 2) at the time of bid opening an error was discovered in the number of trees to be included in the bid. Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen, to reject the bids submitted for tree trimming and directing that the project be rebid. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 10, 1984, APPROVED; TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION POLICY DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards to approve the following recommendations of the Traffic Safety Committee: I . 1) Reaffirmation .of action recommended by the Committee at the March 13, 1984, meeting that additional "NO PARKING SUNDAY, 8:00 - 12:00" signs be added to the south side of West 56th Street between Wooddale Avenue and St. John's Avenue, and that the same restriction be applied to the north side of West 56th Street between Wooddale Avenue and Kellogg Avenue, 2) That '.'NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs be placed on the south side of Fuller Street adjacent to St. Peter's Lutheran Church and School; and to acknowledge Section C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 10, 1984. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Mr. Hoffman advised that the Traffic Safety Committee is seeking guidance from the Council on the matter of the Committee's role in reacting to specific.requests for signalization or on implementing a signalization plan or strategy. He stated that there are approximately 30 traffic signals in the City now and that there are 18 more sites that are reaching traffic levels to warrant signalization. The Council requested that background information be prepared and furnished them to aid them in developing a signalization plan for the City. Mr. Hoffman stated he would present the requested information to the Council at an off - Monday night meeting. No formal action was taken. ,ON -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR LE BISTRO CAFE. Mr. Bernhardson presented the request of Restaurants Plus of Edina, Inc., dba The New LeBistro Cafe of Edina, 3433 Hazelton Road, for an On -Sale Beer License. Robert Benowitz, managing partner, advised that the restaurant will be re- opening as a franchise of LeBistro. There being no objection, Member Richards moved approval of the On -Sale Beer License for The New LeBistro Cafe of Edina. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. SALE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, LAKE EDINA VILLAGE REPLAT APPROVED. Mr. Bernhardson .recalled that a number of years ago, as part of the State right of way on Highway 100, the City acquired some land on Lake Edina that was platted. At the present time, Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Edina Village Replat remains for sale. The City has negotiated with a buyer for sale of the lot at a price of $16,000 and would request Council authori- zation for sale thereof. Member Schmidt moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the sale of Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Edina Village Replat is hereby approved and that the Mayor and City Manager are directed and authorized to execute a Contract for Deed for the property, with terms as follows: $1,000.00 to be paid on date of closing, with the balance of $15,000.00 in monthly installments of $140.00 per month, to begin on June 15, 1984, and continue on the fifteenth day of each month thereafter until February 15, 1985, when the then unpaid principal balance, with accrued interest at the rate of 11% per annum, shall be paid in full. The City shall pay a commission of $1,000.00 on the sale. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 4/16/84 CONVEYANCE OF WOODDALE SCHOOL RESOLUTION DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson recalled that at the meeting of February 27, 1984, the Council had adopted a resolution with regard to the terms of an agreement for the conveyance of the Wooddale School site from Independent School District No. 273 (the "School District "). Subsequently, the School District has adopted a similar resolution, but with some._modifications. Following discussion Member Richards moved that the staff and the City Attorney be directed to work out the differences with the School District, prepare a draft, agreement and bring it back to the Council for approval. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. LEE HEIKENS APPOINTED TO EDINA ART CENTER COMMITTEE. Mayor Courtney advised that Mary Hauser has declined her appointment to the Edina Art Center Committee and that Mrs. Lee Heikens, 4500 Casco Avenue, has been recommended for appointment. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Bredesen appointing Lee Heikens to the Edina Art Center Committee for a 3 -year term to February 1, 1987. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BOARD OF REVIEW HEARING RESCHEDULED FOR MAY 29, 1984. As recommended by the Assessor, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards, rescheduling the Board of Review hearing date to May 29, 1984, at 5 p.m. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. H.O.M.E. PROGRAM FUNDING DISCUSSED; LETTER APPROVED. Member Turner commented that the H.O.M.E. Program operated by South Hennepin Human Services Council has been funded in several ways; by the City through CDBG funds, other municipalities, Hennepin County, Metropolitan Council and Federal grants. A request has been made for Council.approval of a letter to be signed by the Mayor to be sent to the Metropolitan Council urging their continued funding of the H.O.M.E Program. Member Turner advised that the program is being used by residents of.Edina. There being no objection, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards approving a letter to be signed by the Mayor to be sent to the Metropolitan Council requesting their continued funding of the H.O.M.E. Program. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. SERVICE LEVELS TO BE DISCUSSED. Mr. Bernhardson advised that a discussion of Service Levels has been tentatively 1984. No action was taken. scheduled for the off - Monday Council Meeting on April 23, RELEASE OF OBLIGATIONS /OUTLOT C, WALNUT RIDGE THIRD ADDITION AGREEMENT AUTHORIZED. Mr. Bernhardson advised that a request has been made for release by the City of obligations as stated in a Declaration and Agreement entered into on April 28, 1978, between the City and First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee with regard to Outlot C, Walnut Ridge Third Addition. Inasmuch as all obligations contained in the Agreement have been fulfilled, staff would recommend that a release be granted, subject to confirmation that payment of certain sums to the City has been made. Member Richards moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina and First. Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee entered into a Declaration and Agreement ( "Agreement ") on April 28, 1978, and as recorded in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County as Document No. 1272566; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provided for the removal of a certain building and the restoration of property located on Outlot C, Walnut Ridge Third Addition, and the payment of certain sums to the City of Edina in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, all obligations contained in the Agreement have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of the City of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute and deliver on behalf of the City a Certificate of Satisfaction and Fulfillment acknowledging the fulfillment of all obligations contained in the Agreement. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RECEPTION FOR DICK AND MARIE WYATT TO BE HELD ON MAY 23. Mr. Bernhardson advised the Council Members that a reception will be held for Dick and Marie Wyatt on May 23. in appreciation of their many contributions to Edina. The reception will be from 5 to 7 p.m. at the Edina Community Center. No action was taken. 4/16/84 ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A1 ADOPTED (TO CLARIFY THE CONTINUING BOND PROCEDURE); SECOND READING WAIVED. Mr. Bernhardson advised that there is a need to clarify the continuing bond procedure for various licenses issued by the City and staff would therefore recommend adoption of Ordinance No. 142 -A1. Member Richards moved adoption of.the following ordinance, with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 142 -A1 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 142 TO CLARIFY THE CONTINUING BOND PROCEDURE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. The last paragraph of Section 3 of Ordinance No. 142 is hereby amended to read as follows: "The term of such bond shall be continuing and shall not terminate until thirty (30) days after the date upon which the City receives written notice of such termina- tion, said notice to be served by registered mail. Such bond shall provide that the City is the sole obligee under such bond and that no other party is intended to be benefited by the provisions thereof. Such bond shall be submitted on the form on file in the office of the City Clerk. Copies thereof shall be available to all applicants without charge. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt was seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List of 4/16/84: General Fund $77,530.17, Park Fund $22,443.30, Art Center $1,407.19, Park Construction Fund $28.00, Golf Course Fund $8,274.03, Recreation Center Fund $1,407.45, Gun Range Fund $204.45, Waterwork Fund $8,909.54, Sewer Rental Fund $170,233.82, Liquor Dispensary Fund $65,214.78, Construction Fund $10,470.21, Total $366,122.94; and for confirmation of payment of the following Claims dated 3/31/84: General Fund $130,611.47, Park Fund $11,822.68, Art Center $729.85, Swimming Pool Fund $957.07, Golf Course Fund $2,280.62, Recreation Center Fund $14,182.88, Gun Range Fund $374.02, Waterwork Fund $18,002.63, Sewer Rental Fund $2,635.34, Liquor Dispensary Fund $265,536.26, IBR #2 $100,000.00, Total $547,132.82. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, the Mayor declared the meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 23, 1984 In attendance were Members Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. CITY SERVICE LEVELS DISCUSSED. City Manager Rosland stated that this meeting is being held so that the Council Members could review, discuss and evaluate the present levels of City services in an effort to determine areas in which the service level could be improved and /or areas in which the service level could be reduced. Services provided by the following departments were specifically examined: Health, Public Works, Planning, Police, City Clerk, Building, Park and Recreation, Fire and Assessing. No formal action was taken. City Clerk 5901 Drew Avenue South' 6. Minneapolis; Minn.- 55410': April 26, 1984 Edina City Council City Hall,.Edina, Minnesota Re: proposed tree - trimming assessments We had our boulevard trees (along with others on our lot) trimmed by a professional tree service in February of this year. vie feel we should be exempted from the assessment proposed. We ask that the tree inventory be revised to exclude our trees as they will need no further trimming for the foreseeable future. Yours truly, -rb r . i/I rrIfy U oKd rrr C. C u,w• S �a • ��c� &I if 14 64 We A*-f ' a V%*—. ce h r � vi It r�o% 4 vv<<) �'`T�rrd.w 0. 4. 6 t t) ^tcapa -- 0'4. d cam.,. �'\ �. � v►.�j �� ". IM �tj �,�._ � r�4'� I art. ��cas� n►�al��S� ADVERTISING AND MARKETING CONSULTANT A. R. ROOT - 5228 KELLOGG AVE. SO., MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 55424 DA`'ID L. MITCHELL 33 SOUTH FIFTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 March 27, 1984 Mr. Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park & Recreation Department City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Tree Trimming Dear Mr. Kojetin: We live at 5236 Brookview Avenue (the corner of Brookview and 53rd Streets) overlooking Arden Park. We received your letters concerning the scheduled hearing to determine the necessity of a tree trimming project in our portion of the City. We are in favor of this type of effort and I personally feel that it is appropriate for residents to share the cost of such an effort. Efforts such as the proposed tree trimming project are indicative of the quality of our community. Your letter is, to a certain extent, ironic. The letter indicates that we have one or more boulevard trees scheduled for trimming within the proposed program. Our lot was devastated three years ago in the June tornado which destroyed all but two of the trees on our lot. We still have one boule- vard tree, an oak which appears to be diseased and which the City Forester trimmed last year in an effort to save it. It is as yet too early to tell whether that tree will survive. We would be interested to know whether the City has any plans to replace the trees that we lost in the tornado. Very truly yours, 1. '&4�4 Aja� David L. Mitchell s1� DLM:cak RALPH C. E. PETERSON, D.D.S. 616 SOUTHDALE MEDICAL BUILDING EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 PRACTICE LIMITED TO ENDODONTICS Bob Kojetin, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department 4,801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Bob; 20 March 1984 TELEPHONE (612) 922 -6022 Regarding the proposed tree trimming project,we do have two boulevard trees but they do not need trimming and I feel I should not be charged to do no trimming. I think your bid from the trimmers is based on number of boulevard trees and not there need for trimming. Our trees have been trimmed several times in the past few years, the last time when the tornado came through our block and nearly destroyed everything. All we have left is tops, no low branches even reachable with a ladder or a snorkel truck. I feel an assessment on my property would be unfair and insist we be deleted from your list of charges. T� ! b NJ I. Sincerely Ralph C. E. Peterson 5336 Oaklawn Avenue Edina, MN 55424 l K.C. Curmnings 5601 Park P1. Edina, MN, 55424 CITY OF _. ... VEDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55-124 612- 927 -8861 Dear Resident: In 1984 the City is proposing to contract for the trimming of 989 trees in an area bounded by Highway 100 on the West, 50th Street on the North, the Eastern City boundary line on the East and the Southern city boundary line on the South. On Monday, April 2, 1984, the Edina City Council will conduct a public hearing to determine the necessity of a tree trimming project. This hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 59, 1984 Session Law. If the project is ordered, it is expected that the cost of trimming would be assessed against properties. The City of Edina tree inventory indicates the boulevard trees which need to be trimmed Immediately, or 2 -3 years. According to the tree inventory, it has been determined that you have one or more boulevard trees scheduled for trimming within this program. The estimated total cost is $49,450.00 The estimated assessment per dwelling is $50.00. The area proposed to be assessed includes: An area bounded by Highway 100 on the West, 50th Street on the North, the Eastern City boundary line on the East and the Southern City boundary line on the South. If approved, this project will be started this spring. Assessments would be levied late in 1985 and would be due and payable in full in 1986. Please forward any comments or suggestions to the City Council in care of City Hall prior to -che hearing or be present at the hearing itself. Please call me if you have any questions. Very truly yours , / f G Bob Kojeti, Director 7 , y Edina Park and Recreation Department G,4 BK:mk IVILto.. z 4t A co P'f A-� 3/19/ Q� Ate ourx 4A,,.t 1, 4- a. .�,,. � . 3. �' ESTIMATE OF COST CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. P.L. -25 LOCAITON: Between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Avenue HEARING DATE: May 7, 1984 ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $364.00 (Includes Engineering & Clerical ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $91.00 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOT BLOCK ADDITION PINS NUMBER W 2 2 Normandale. 30- 28 -24 -22 -0017 of 2 W 2 2 30- 28 -24 -22 -0020 of 3 E 2 3 30- 28 -24 -22 -0026 of 2 E 2 3 30- 28 -24 -22 -0029 of 3 UNIT QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL ! N.S.P. Charges $325.00 SUB - TOTAL: $325.00 ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL : 39.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION 364.00 Prepared By Checked By -` v' and City Engineer I ., 1 March 26, 1994 Mr. Bob Obermelrer, City of Edina, 4801 W. 50th ,t. Edina, Minn. 55424 Bear Mr. Obermeyer: We are writing this letter in connection with the street lighting in our block, the 6200 block of Parnell Ave. The riddle of t'ie block is very dark at night, and in the past it has been used by various people as an attractive area for late night parking. We are wondering if it would be possible to install a light near the center of the block to correct the above situation. A spot we would like to suggest is on the east side of the avenue, on the line between 6209 and 6217 Darnell. 'This letter is also being siKned by the property owners on both sides of the street to indicate their approval. In the past the Northern States Power Co. moved the arc light on the corner of 62nd and Parnell so the light was in the middle of the street, and this did help the situation a great deal. If at all possible it *.could probably help_ a Treat deal too if the light at 63rd and Parnell were more in the middle of the intersection. If it is possible to install a light in the middle of the block, we are wondering if there is a "lantern" type of light that can be used. We would appreciate anything you can do for this situation, as with the coming_ of summer and foliage on the trees, our block is very dark. Yours very truly, 6209 Parnell Ave. 6217 Parnell Ave. 11w Md Parnell _ e. 621b Parnell Ave. Northern States Power Company Normandale Division 5309 West 70th Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 Telephone (612) 941 -2992 _ April 3, 1984 Mr. Robert Obermeyer City of Edina 4801 W,. 50th St. Edina;`MN 55424 Dear Bob, Mr. Vern Levander of 6216 Parnell Ave. has requested information and costs about amid -block street light. We would propose to install a custom residental or- namental street light with underground wiring between 6209 and 6217 Parnell Ave. Our charge to the City would be an estimated $325.00 assuming the installation takes place in the summer and the City is responsible for all sod restoration. We can install an overhead streetlight at the same location at no additional charge. Please send me a letter should you decide to proceed with this project. Sincerely, Stuart E. Fraser SEF /mm 2,-z5 April 20, 1994 Mr. Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works City of Edina 401 W. 50th St. Edina, Minn. 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman: Recentiv, we made a .recuest for a light in the center of the 6200 block on Parnell Ave. We have been told the estimates have been turned in and the matter has been sent to the City Council for their approval. The day that we were at the City Hall we talked with the Finance Director, and he told us it would be allrigbt to pay for the installed light when you have the charges, in that way eliminating the "interest charge" shown on the estimate. The reason for this letter is the item on the estimate for re- sodding the area. With the small amount of repair that will be needed, we see no reason why we can't do this work ourselves, eliminating extra cost shown in the estimate for this item. Our block is well maintained, and there should be no concern on your part regarding appearances, once the light is in place. It would be appreciated if you would consider this matter, as we naturally wish to hold the cost as low as we can. Yours very truly, Vernon R. Lavander 6216 Parnell Ave. Edina, Minn. 55424 LOCATION MAP ,' t •,t: _ i. N U M B E R S -84 -3 Gustafson S Assoc. t_rmFF@( 'vALIEY..• . 'VA CREEK CREEK -� ELEM. Z Q . sm %-- oko 0 t l c -E E CiAC�E L O C A T 10 N Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills Generally located west of Indian Hills Road and north of Dakota Trail REQUEST �1 -� 5 -� E EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT S -84 -3 Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills Generally located west of Indian Hills Road and north of Dakota Trail. Mr. Larsen reported that the subject property measures 141,700 square feet and is zoned R -1, Single Family Dwelling District. Approximately 25 percent of the property is contained within the normal elevation of Arrowhead Lake. The property is developed with a single family dwelling located slightly north of the center of the lot. The proponent is requesting a subdivision of the property to create one new buildable lot. It is the stated intent of the proponent to remove the existing dwelling and to construct new dwellings on both of the lots resulting from the subdivision. As proposed, Lot 1 would contain 91,600 square feet, r and Lot 2 would have 50,100 square feet, including the area lying in Arrowhead Lake. Both lots, as proposed, would exceed the requirements of both the existing and the revised Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen reminded the Commission of the subdivision recently completed for the property immediately south of the subject site. Mr. Larsen explained that Staff recommends approval of the subdivision, but would like to see a more even division of the property. Moving the lot line between Lots 1 and 2, 10 to 20 feet northerly, would be a significant improvement. He further noted that the removal of the existing dwelling will allow for greater flexibility in siting new homes which will enable the new dwelling to better blend with the existing character of the Indian Hills area. Mr. Larsen concluded that Staff would also recommend the following conditions: -3- 1. Subdivision dedication 2. Protective shoreline easement. Mr. Connor Schmid, an attorney representing Mr. and Mrs. John Weston who reside at 6516 Indian Hills Road, was present. Mr. Schmid submitted a petition bearing signatures of residents in the Indian Hills area who are in opposition to the replatting of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills. The concerns of the Weston's were addressed by Mr. Schmid as follows: a. What kind of homes will be placed on these smaller lots which are subdivided? b. Doubling of the density on the lot. C. Property value decline of surrounding homes d. The subdivision will substantially diminish the character and symmetry of the Indian Hills neighborhood Mr. Schmid stated that the argument of a precedent being set by the recent subdivision of the Peterson Replat should be rejected. He stated that that situation was one which was highly charged with emotion and was unique in its particular situation and, therefore, was considered on its individual merit. Those who were present and spoke in opposition to the proposed subdivision were: Donald Buck, 6509 Indian Hills Road, Orrin Haugen, 6612 Indian Hills Road, Mr. J. Robert Gardner, 6620 Indian Hills Road, John Peterson, 9873 Aquilla Road, Bloomington (represented Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Peterson, 6517 Indian Hills Road). Items of concern in the Indian Hills area addressed were density, decreased foliage, stability of the neighborhood, decreased property values, the steep terrain of the proposed subdivision would not lend itself to additional building sites, difficulty in keeping the weed growth down, and the destroyed feeling of isolation. Mr. Richard M. Smith, 6600 Mohawk Trail, a builder, developer and land planner was present and stated that by permitting wholesale development and lots splits, Indian Hills could be turned into "just another community ". He asked for the Commission's careful consideration of this subdivision as the result would have a great affect on the future of the Indian Hills area. Mr. Greg Gustafson, 7723 Gleason Road, brother of the proponent who is an attorney, was present and outlined items of mention to the Commission. He discussed the background of the Gustafson family saying that they were not intending to detract from the value of the Indian Hills area. He stated that his brother and wife would reside in the home located on the northerly lot, and his brother, Jeff, would build and sell the home to be located on the southerly lot. He also stated that Jeff is known as a very reputable builder in Edina having built many homes in excess of $300,000. Donna Hipps, 6604 Dakota Trail, made reference to the fact that when she purchased her home in 1958 a restrictive covenant was signed stating there -4- would never be more lots in Indian Hills as long as the covenant was in effect. She stated another contingency of the restrictive covenant was that r. one would sell off more than log of their lot. She stated her concern that i the proposed subdivision were to be passed, a future precedent would certainl be set. Mr. Palmer, noted he recently observed the proposed subdivision site and felt that it would be a detriment to the neighborhood to have two homes o the proposed site especially in relation to the difference in the terrain, th lake and the woods on that particular lot. Mrs. Shaw asked for clarification of how binding a restrictive covenant was. Planner, Craig Larsen, explained that this is a private matter between homeowners. Mr. Skagerberg addressed the audience as to what their general opinior was for subdividing any lots in the Indian Hills area. The general opinion g was negative, and it was stated that the residents who bought in the Indian Hills area wanted to continue enjoying it for their originalrintentions Of purchase. Mr. Palmer, however, felt that each situation should be dealt with individually. No further discussion being heard, Mr. Palmer made a motion to deny the request for subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor; motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 29, 1984 S -84 -3 Gustafson & Assoc., Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills Generally located: West of Indian Hills Road and north of Dakota Trail Refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat The subject property measures 141,700 square feet and is zoned R -1, Single Family Dwelling District. Approximately 25 percent of the property is contained within the normal elevation of Arrowhead Lake. The property is developed with a single family dwelling located slightly north of the center of the lot. The proponent is requesting a subdivision of the property to create one new buildable lot. It is the stated intent of the proponent to remove the existing dwelling and to construct new dwellings on both of the lots resulting from the subdivision. As proposed, Lot 1 would contain 91,600 square feet, and Lot 2 would have 50,100 square feet, including the area lying in Arrowhead Lake. Both lots exceed all Zoning Ordinance requirements. The Commission will recall that a subdivision was recently completed for the property immediately south of the subject site. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the subdivision, but would like to see a more even division of the property. Moving the lot line between Lots j and 2 10 to 20 feet northerly would be a significant - improvement. -The removal of the existing dwelling will allow for greater flexibility in siting new homes which will enable the new dwelling to better blend with the existing character of the Indian Hills area. Staff would also recommend the following conditions to approval: 1. Subdivision dedication 2. Protective shoreline easement. Normally a 100 foot easement is required. However, a variance from this requirement may be needed to provide suitable building sites. r 3i/E 11TGATICN ARAP — PRELIMINARY' RON KRUEGER S ASS=A31ea�- IfVG-, LAND SURVEYING • ENGI/EE ING. RI.O FLYING CLOUD DRIVE • EDEN PRAIRIE. �NI.gSGTA.S53u�pnGNE�BIT 9.I,3= OWNE,p— OEVELOA�ER GUSTAFSON ANO ASSOC /ATES 4o /5 NEST 65774 STREET 60 /NA M /NNE507-A JEFF 6USTAFSo/�/ ,PH:- 927- /27 �\ 793110 r SGALE W FEET I Ae.6� el+d. � eAi..m..• ply.. �. n.. 'em .ad . e 1 . • Aa.m.c Ls.r FeB 22,84 H<. /4374 i i43oO so.rT. I27880 SO. rr OjA I /NO /A N � 1 . 5 /7E D DATA R- T A A f2EA 141700 x7.FT, 3.2S AG �� L LEE.A[. O OESCRlPT /ON: 793110 r SGALE W FEET I Ae.6� el+d. � eAi..m..• ply.. �. n.. 'em .ad . e 1 . • Aa.m.c Ls.r FeB 22,84 H<. /4374 i i43oO so.rT. I27880 SO. rr OjA I /NO /A N � 1 . I Ae.6� el+d. � eAi..m..• ply.. �. n.. 'em .ad . e 1 . • Aa.m.c Ls.r FeB 22,84 H<. /4374 i i43oO so.rT. I27880 SO. rr OjA I /NO /A N � 1 . RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls Cougar Addition; and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS COUGAR ADDITION lying north of a line running from a point in the west line of said lot therein distant 73.18 feet south of the northwest corner of said lot to a point in the east line of said lot therein distant 75.08 feet south of the northeast corner of said lot; and Lot 1, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS COUGAR ADDITION, except that part thereof lying north of a line running from a point in the west line of said lot therein distant 73.18 feet south of the northwest corner of said lot to a point in the east line of said lot therein distant 75.08 feet south of the northeast corner of said lot; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or-as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 4, Block 1, The Habitat; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, THE HABITAT lying northerly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 4 distant 16.67 feet southerly as measured along said line, of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 123.48 feet southerly of the northeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record; and That part of Lot 4, Block 1, THE HABITAT lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on the west line.of said Lot 4 distant 16.67 feet southerly as measured along said line, of the northwest corner thereof to a point on the east line of said Lot 4 distant 123.48 feet southerly of the northeast corner thereof, and reserving easements of record; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the..City of Edina Ordinance.Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as,separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: AGENDA ITEM - II.A - GUSTAFSON REPLAT - INDIAN HILLS DATE: MAY 7, 1984 I took a telephone call from Warren and Dorothy Reynolds, 6401 Indian Hills Road (941 -2557) today at 4:30 p.m. They wanted the Council to know that they oppose the Gustafson Replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills. Cannot attend meeting tonight. PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the !Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonablerelia!nce on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots.in this area on Arrowhead Lake: will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,rof our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be deniedand that any further.consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity tQ appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS t i , I. PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME V' yet� Of 0 RESIDENCE ADDRESS /J ' �sr2� I page 2 signatures continued: NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS k 0� -2- PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of-Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily ,absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity tQ appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME Zva.�e -erL NAME -1- RESIDENCE ADDRESS 10 <, , RESIDENCE ADDRESS Vac, HN 9e-b 'r 00�D e -1- NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS ell ' I -1- .:;;P 0 PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration.of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent.due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME kv L%&WLL -1- RESIDENCE ADDRESS 3 G q 12- wi�q'wj . -1- LV HL•1!. nn -1- k(zb1VzNUz AuuktZb' �6.�5 �P�1urar� PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. -1- RESIDENCE ADDRESS. AV petition to the Planning Commission and City Council.' A- CNAME �tLr l�n+�+t -I- NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS RESIDENCE ADDRESS PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the.lot, lake and the- neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME NAME r � L -1- -I- RESIDENCE ADDRESS 66u OaL rA0A /CREESSIDENCE ADDRESS i PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas,'we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- ` versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area '` �✓ _ " "'Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting'of Lot 5 1-be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate t�= opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental- ,:,.. -,, petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. _ NAME r T RESIDENCE ADDRESS i e. &� /� ",IF ... .... ... 0 -- _--- -- �i�••� Anown oy supplemental -petition to the Planning Commission and City Council.-'-:- :� NAME _. RESIDENCE ADDRESS Y� 42 /7 NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS Job -�t�,Q�, � ' lot 6 805 an E 1 VX LJV 1 d , L , i VL.#.L 9l\ IAi LLJ TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot .5 will ad- = versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, -...as well as the value,of our own homes and the area y' °�`�herefore, we respectfully request that replattinng of Lot 5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for replatting be continued for a reasonable period to permit those . ,fie ••,, -additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate _opportunity•- "tq appear or make their positions known by supplemental t .petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. =� NAME -_ 4o e-1 -I- . -1- lV 1"u•1L1 4t" . . S RESIDENCE ADDRESS RESIDENCE ADDRESS. 6ffDg1 au(g e d r1jJ1Lr+LV I.� tlLLnL�JJ YETITIUN IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and -have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and , Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will•.ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area and will significantly diminish the enjoyment,, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot 5 be denied and that any-further consideration of the r quest for replatting be.continued for a reasonable period to permit those additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS Ae Z page 2 signatures continued: NAME CQ2e�.crZ_ 0 RESIDENCE ADDRESS � � I � � ►�, � c-�n � c � � S C� rc., e G 7 / (o TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: Whereas, the undersigned are residents of the Indian Hills area and have purchased our homes in reasonable reliance on the existing plats of the area; and Whereas, we feel strongly that any further subdivision of developed single family lots in this area on Arrowhead Lake will not preserve neighborhood character and symmetry in accord with the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina; and Whereas, we believe that any replatting of Lot 5 will ad- versely affect both the aesthetics of the lot, lake and the neighborhood area-and will significantly diminish the enjoyment, as well as the value,of our own homes and the area, Therefore, we respectfully request that replatting of Lot -5 be denied and that any further consideration of the request for ~� replatting be continued for a reasonable period to _ P permit those - additional residents, who are or will be temporarily absent due to- -... ' _- -_-�� seasonal travel, vacation or the Easter Holidays, an adequate opportunity to appear or make their positions known by supplemental petition to the Planning Commission and City Council. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS �o �! / /�� /I� /� T Q•rol �cli! i!�cNl liar��wJ � �o �/�C /�. - -- - 2.zY.�4 a, -- ��i 7VO PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO REPLATTING OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA: The undersigned object to the replatting of the above -des- cribed property. NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS loG � lol000 y�a�.� ' � 6 0 v �U lk MRS. JOHN J. WESTON 6516 INDIAN HILLS ROAD EDINA. MINNESOTA 55435 February 29, 1984 To whom it may concern, I thought that asking neighbors to sign the enclosed petitions would be an unpleasant and dificult job. Surprisingly, it has s been quite easy. Time consuming; yes, but certainly most gratifying. I've found support and agreement from everyone I've talked to in the past six days. Three people on Arrowhead Lake (not Indian Hills residents) "do not care to become involved in an Indian Hills issue. Other than that, everyone hhat Mary Buck and I have asked to sign the petitions have been happy to sign and pleased that something is being done to discourage subdividing of single family lots in Indian Hills. Thirty of the forty people who supported the Peterson sub- division are now opposed to dividing Lot #5 into two lots. Each person seemed surprised and expressed in varying degrees that they honestly believed that the Peterson subdivision would not set a precedent. The emotions involved were-a real influence upon their decisions. The point that that we want to make concerns aesthetic land use in the Indian Hills area only; not in all of Edina. Only a few truly attractive areas remilii in Edina because at an ever increasing pace, subdivision continues to consume the surroundings we value as home owners. The "Domino Theory is in full swing!" Unfortunately because of a neighborhood being sensitive to the needs of one of their long time residents, Mrs. Warren Peterson. The few remaining larger pieces of property give to all of L-dian Hills a feeling of space. These properties are precious >bo evdryone; not just to their owners. Without them, we will become an Ill planned Country Club area, because the original plan and intent for Indian Hills was not honored. Woperties will be purchased not for shelter. They will be purchased and lived in only until another subdividing business deal can be completed. Subdivision seldom enhances aesthetic values and never increases dollar value * adjacent properties. I trust that the judgment of the Edina Planning Commissioners Will be fair and sensitive to the needs mid values of all of the residents of Indian Hills. Thank you s cerely, John anxd Pamela Weston f i MM8OO1 (0959)(4- OO4369SO57)PD, 02/26/84 0957 ICS IPMMTZZ CSP 3059434588 NL TDMT POMPANO BEACH FL 19 02 -26 O957A EST PMS EDINA CITY COUNCIL CARE.MRS JOHN WESTON, DLR 6516 INDIAN HILLS RD EDINA. MN 55435 I AM AGAINST SUBDIVISION OF LOTS IN THE INDIAN HILLS AREA SUB . 11 HARRY MURPHY JR 6508 INDIAN HILLS RD .EDINA MN 55435 DIVISION NNNN W N. 1201 •SF (RS 8Si 6512~ IN'4IAN HILLS RD EDINA MN 55435 26AM . ►I • r • • 4- 006877SOST 02/26/64 ICS IPMBNGZ CSP MPSB 81341726345 MGM TDBN FT MEYERS FL 63 02 -26 1255P EST Boo PAMELA R WESTON 6516 INDIAN HILLSRD EDINA MN 55435 { DUPLICATE OF TELEPHONED TELEGRAM WE SUPPORT YOUR PETITiON OPPOSING THE DIVISION OF'LOT 5 ON ARROWHEAD LAKE IN EDINA. WE ALSO RESENT THE SOMEWHAT SURREPTITIOUS ATTEMPTS OF ( THE DEVELOPER TO ACCOMPLISH SUCH DIVISION AT A TIME WHEN MANY NEIGHBORS WERE ON WINTER VACATION. TED AND KATY CARLSEN ( 6512 INDIAN HILLS RD EDINA MN 55435 i2i56 EST MGMCOMP S N m N w N N TO REPLY BY MAILGRAM MESSAGE. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR WESTERN UNION'S TOI L - FRFF PMONF NIIMRFRS March 19, 1984 Edina City Council 4805 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Council Members: As the president of the Arrowhead Lake Improvement Associa- tion, I would like to call to the council's attention the petition opposing the subdivision on Lake Arrowhead which was signed by over 75% of the home owners on this lake. Due to vacations and other absences at this time of the year, we were not able to contact all the home owners on Lake Arrowhead. At the meeting of the City Planning Commission the request made by Mr. Jeff Gustafson to sub - divide this property was denied. I would again like to state my concern and opposition to the subdivision of the property on Lake Arrowhead. Sincerely, Monica C. Flynn President Arrowhead Lake Improvement Assoc, 6312 Post Lane Edina, MN 55435 P A M E L A DONNELLY A R C H I T E C T 22 February 84 Reference: 6520 Indian Hills Road Edina, Minnesota 55435 ■ To Whom It May Concern: P A M A DON LY. A" R C -H 1 T E. C T -1 5 2 S O U T H BEDFORD D R 1 V.E BEVERLY HILLS C A L I F O R N I A 90212 213''859•.1365 As an architect and former resident of the Twin Cities Area, I am concerned and saddened to learn that one of the early houses designed by the renowned residential architect, Carl Humphrey, is slated for demolition and it's site will be further developed into three small lots. The thought of destroying this residence is distressing enough however, of greatest concern are the potentially very serious dangers of subdividing this parcel. The residents of Indian Hills did not purchase their property and build their homes in the expectation of someday being crowded on all sides by a housing development. The Indian Hills area appeals to people because of the way it is - not because of what it could be. What type of precedent would be set if this lot is allowed to be cut up at will despite neighbor's protests? The nature of my work as well as my past association with the office of Richard Meier and Partners whose award - winning and nationally recognized work includes such details as the glass block seen in this house, make it especially frightening to see this structure be so easily condemned. Carl Humphrey sited this house so as to take advantage of it's commanding view of the lake and gave it strong architectural lines - neither of which have changed today. In my opinion, in the hands of a sensitive owner, this house could regain it's dignity and be the wonderfully dramatic lakeside residence it 152 S O U T H B E D F O R D D R I V E B E V E R L Y HILLS C A L I F O R N I A 90212 2 1 3. 8 5 9. 1 3 6 5 was designed and meant to be. Sincerely yours, Tamela Donne"Architect PD:tm Consulting Planners One Grov _and Terrace (612)377-3536 Minneapolis Minnesota 55403 Howard Dah1gren Associates / Inciorporated Statement (2)i V, Ln. '0 j. April 1, 1984 I A �4 ef 4F 7111 IfC 0 R 11� v 2 C 4 ie-PVT C�= s s . t2 C *z7 726 GAG, 1(t? -23 CIS { fit; �! - 149-A 400'7446142a�� "'Aft ... ....... ....... . c4ut zz 'rip 4 F s r CROSSviEw -urHERAN CHURCH VA4. 1. E v CREEK V E L E M. .. ......... Fla j ............ d4 .0 IXOIA CIRCL- % 40 IL Ep. N U M 19 E R S-83-9 Peterson Generally located north 'i5f III L 0 C A T 10 N Lot 3, Block 1, in ian Hills A ' ition REQUEST Dakota Trail ian Hills Road and west of EDINA PLANNING Dx=zDARTMENT "d' I t Indian Hills r.�.. Protective Covenants rThis conveyance is made subject to such of the foll"Wing co errant >, reaervatiot s aril rcr.t.rictions hereinaftei rred to as Protective Covenants, as stay by their term:. Lc applicable to said prvntises, which Protective Covenants l run with the land and be binding upon and inure to the 1,enclit of the p:u-tics hereto, their heirs, executors, admin- ctors, successors and assigns, tit December 31st, 1ttr;h, tt which tints said Protective Covenants shall be auto - cally extended for successive periods o ten yea Iq• a vote of the majority of the then owners of the lots prising said Indian Hills, hereinafter referred to a:; Subdivision, it is ;l9rced by appropriate action to change, in whole t purt,4nid Protective Covenants which arc its follows: 1 - 1. Lots 1 and 20, Block 5, are herchy designated as Luke Lots and may not be developed or used except as addli- Eioni to, and subject to the Protective Covenants applicable to Lots 2 to 4 and 14 to 1:1 both inclusive, of said Block 5. Lot 4, Block 1, Lots 10 and 11, Block 5, and Luts A and 13, excepting any portions thereof which may be combined with adjoining lots are herchy designated us Recreational Lots .11141 clay not IW u>a•d or developed except for private, non -com- mercial recreational use and pleasure purposes for the benefit of the uttncrs of lots in said subdivision or of any associa- tion, club or group of owners of twenty (20) or inure lots in said Subdivision. Lots C. I), E, F, and G are hereby desig- nated as Reserved Lots and may not be used for Residential purpose= but shall be subject to the prohibitions and reserva- tinns of Paragraphs U and 11 hereof. All other lots in said Subdivision are hereby designated as Residential lots. 2. No structure shall be erected, altered. placed ur pernlittedi to remain un any said Residential lot other than one detached single family dwelling, not to exceed two stories, attic and basement. in height, with attached private garage and other attached or detached out - buildings incidental to reyi'lential use of said lot. S "id dwelling shall have an effec- tive area of not lens than 1,600 square feet, defined and computed, fur the purpwe of saia Protective Covenants, as the sum of the following: (a) the area of enclosed heated living; space on the ground or main flour of said dwelling; (b) one - fourth ( r/, ) of the area, if any, of enclosed heated living space on any floor above the ground or main floor of said dwelling; (c) the area of any attached garages, porches and similar space incidental to said dwelling which are contained under permanent type roofs and extend the lines of the building beyoml the areas defined in (a) above, Pro- vided, however, that for the purpose of effective area requirements the maximum addition to total effective [area under this paragraph (c) shall nut in any event eyceed •100 square feet. u building shall be erected, placed or altered un any building plot ill this subdivision until the building plans, tation ecifications, exterior color scheme, and plot. plan showing the location, all gt•adies of such building have been approved writing as to c"rlformity and harmony of external design with exi :lill. structures in the subdivision, and as to of the build:P1V With respect to topogr phy, street and finished groutul elev.Itiony by a committee composed of Ilal R. Burton, Maly It. Burton and one additional ncmber to be selected by them from the list of Owners of lots in said subdivision, or by a representative designated by a majority of the members of said committee. In event of the death, resignation or incapacity of any member of said committee the remaining nrcnibers shs:ll have full authority to act here- under, or to designate n representative with lil:e authority. Said committee shall have authority to elect additional mem- hers from among owners of lots in said subdivisions, r.nd whenever said committee may be reduced to less than three mem- bers shall so elect, within three months thereafter one or more such additional members. The powers and duties of such committee, and of airy designated representative shall cease on and after December 31, 1973, unless prior to said date and effective thereon a written instrument shall be executed by the then record owner_ of a majority of the lots in said sub- division and duly recorded, appointing a representative or representatives, who shall thereafter exercise the some powers previously exercised by said committee fur a further period of fifteet: years. S ;:id committee or its representative shall approve or disapprove, in writing, al] proposed construction within fifteen clays after submission of plans and accontpanyinr data. In event of approval and subseouent construction subo-tanthdiy according to sail plans and specifications, or modi- fications thereof apprured in writing by said conunittc•e or its repro- entative, this covenant shall be deemed to have been fully complier, with. In event, any construction is undertaken without an applicatin'! for am -ovul by the committee or its representative and no written notice of uiJection thereto is given to the owner cuncerncd by the committee, its representa- tive, or any other interested party prior to tier completion tl:ete(,f, st:eb construction shall be deemed] to Ile approved. In event any construction is undertaken involt'ir,g a sui,st:uttial dd•viittiot; from aTI',)Y0 c.d }flans and specifications, without approval of such changes, or construction %ditch said committee or its representative has disapproved is undertaken, notwithstanding suc!; disapproval, any member of said committee, its representative, or any owner of record of any lot in said subdivision at any time prior to the substantial completion of any such coust.ruction is authorized to institute proceedings to prevent the completion thereof and to require the remuxal of ally such partly completed construction. 4. No building in said subdivision shall have an area in excess of fifteen (15' ;;.) per centum of the area of the lot or building plot upun which it is erected, nor shall any such building cover more than seventy -five (751/r ) per centum of the width of such lot or plot at any point, said} width of building being measured at right angles to the axis of the lot and being the suns of the distances from said axis to the outside walls of said building, including garages and porches, on either side of said axis with width of lot fur such correr ;ponding point along the axis being measured along the same line, extended to sine lot lines. b. No dwelling, includinc garages and porches. sh:dll 1 located on any lot. so that the disilznce from the front or street line thereof to said dwelling shall he lcs� than: te;enty -fi e (25'.;) per centum, nor more t.hnn seventy -live (75'; ) per centum of the depth of the !lit men <urud lhru 0;e c•Cntr:d! I,xis of said dwelling, except that. the committee for approval of proposed construction or its rel'reseutatlNe n;av aiwi,,ve c:scrh.tionF to, said plac(rrnent requirements in the case of lots with unusual topographic:d feature,. Tt.c dent(: of im. , 1 "ts with it l :ace frontage shall be take;, from the front line to the mean water level. 10 it.c•icier;tnl detach - i builofinlr or structure, such as garden or-tool house, detached porches or summer houses, outdoor fireplac• ^s, detached grcenhou :e-, cr ar.y stt•acture other than gates, fences. fountains, or construction inci- dental to dccurntive g : :rdenr ,h ;:Il be placed otltct tha:d up. I, tLc real thirty -five (35',4 ) per centum of any lot. '70 building shall be placed necud•r thwi 15 feet to the sidle an J-4 :,I lice= cf a;,\ in <idc lot, lion• nearer than 25 feet to any side street line. and h6. e elevations or facades to be presented to streets, ]lakes and adjoining lots shall be and effect to therappro al rof property and created under Paragraph 3 hereof. 7. The number of dwellings erected in ally block of said subdivhziun may never exceed the number of lot, origi- nally platted. Original lot lines may be adjusted by minor purchases and sale:; between adjoining Dances provided that the width of any lot may not be reduced by more than ten per centum, nor increased by more than twenty (20%) per centum by any one or more such transactions and provided that no lot shall be reduced to any lesser width than is .required by the provisions of these Protective Covenant, for any existing construction on said lot. Lots may be increased in size of combining lots or parts of lots in a manner to permanently reduce the number of lots in any block. Such revised lots shall be known as combined lots and for the purposes of these Protective Covenants shall. be considered as a single lot, the same us if said conrl,inrd lot had originally been platted as a single lot. 8. Anv detneheti corn ro wnrch such buildin s nee a ur cn:uct. o r:u cr, basement ten `Is rack e ereta on a 'Tu s ru c a any ime uscc uTs ;c residence. temporarily 'or garage or otheyr out - building; of a temporary character be erected, used, or occupied for residence purposes, and no structure lnmay F ellused for residence or other purposes before it shall have been completely finished on the exterior. 8. The following prohibitions shall be observed in said subdivision: (a) No sod, soil, sand or gravel shall he sold or removed from said subdivision without the written consent of the committee on proposed construction or its representative, who from time to time will designate areas within or adjoining said subdivision where surplus material from excavations and grading incident to con- struction may be disposed of to the ultimate Ii nct of the subdivision if such surplus material can not he disposed of to lot owners within said subdivision.' - (b) -No outside containers for stoTnge of fuel m• garbage and refuse cans shall be exposed to view above the groin nor shall any garbage, refuse, taus or other unsightly objects or material be left exposed to view or to become a nuisance. (c) No sign greater than 600 square inches shall be rlaced on nay lot, except signs of the Vendor or its agents. (d) No objectionable trees or shrubbery shall be planted. (e) No fence or wall shall be built to a greater height than 5 feet above the highest adjacent natural or logic- ally developed finished grade, nor- shall any fence or wall forward of the principal front line of any dwelling be built to a greater height than 3 feet above such adjacent grades. (f) No horses, cows, sheep, goats, poultry or fowls, or domestic animals of any kind except well mannered dogs and cats, trained and kept as household pets and not for breeding or- commercial purposes, shall be kept on any of the lots. (g) No fuel or heating plant, or incinerator, giving off black smoke, or strong or obnoxious odors shall be used or operated. (h) No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shall anything constitut- ing a nuisance be done or permitted on any lot. 10. All wells for domestic water supply shall be installed so as to meet the requirements of all applicable public health and sanitary regulations, and shall not be. located nearer than 26 feet to any lot line. Sewage disposal shall be provided by connection to sanitary sewer mains, if available, otherwise by installation for each dwelling of a septic tank and leaching pool, or drain field, in a manner to meet the requirements of all applicable public health and sanitary regulations. No septic tank, leaching pool, or drain field shall be located nearer than 15 feet to any side, front or rear lot line or to the mean water level of any lake, nor shall any leaching pool or drain field be located nearer than 60 feet to any well supplying water for the dwelling served by such sanitary disposal system. 11. An easement is reserved over the rear 6 feet of each lot in said subdivision and over the side 5 feet of any lot, where necessary for installation and maintenance of utility services. 12. If any party shall violate or attempt to violate any of these Protective Covenants during the life thereof it shall be lawful for any party of iu. . s: ;t ilc uu% pint, parcel, w 1„t :11 said but-,, :— ;izion to insatate ^nd prooe:_:o pro- ceedings at late or in equity again:•t huch party, either to prevent the said violation• or to recover damages. 13. Invalidation of any one of these Protective Covenants by judl;nrent or court order shall in no wise affect any other of the said covenants, which shall renlain in full force and effect. 14. The foregoing Protective Covenants are created to establish it desirable and uniform plan for the development and protection of the said subdivision, and are for the benefit of said subdivision and of the owners of all the lots therein, and shall'continue as covenants running with the land in favor of all grantees of the premises in said subdivision. INDIAN HILLS CORPORATION OWNER AND DEVELOPER H. R. & M. R. Burton Managers niid Agents - WA 0049 SOU'T'HWEST' BUILDERS - II. It. BURTON, INC. AfJilliated Builders of Qualit-v• Dousing A 10 4 DEVELOPMENT TEAM MEMBERS Development /Ownership I. The Edina Partnership Purpose: A general partnership established to supervise and coordinate the acquisition, financing, subdivision, and development of the entire 26 ± acre tract of land. Partners: 1) York Edina Partnership, consisting of: (a) Winfield Developments, Inc. (b) Laukka, Inc. (c) Jarvis , - Inc . 2) (a) Mr. Henry Hyatt (b) Mr. Sheldon L. Baskin (c) Mr. Daniel N. Epstein 3) (a) Mr. Thomas W. LaSalle II. Sub - Partnership Entities A. The Edina Townhouse Limited Partnership 43% Interest 43% Interest 14% Interest Purpose: To supervise and coordinate the acquisition, financin�, subdivision and development of the residential (400 - units) portion of the overall development. Partners: 1) York Edina Partnership, consisting of: (a) Winfield Developments, Inc. (b) Laukka, Inc. (c) Jarvis, Inc. 2) (a) Mr. Henry Hyatt (b) Mr. Sheldon L. Baskin (c) Mr. Daniel N. Epstein 3) (a) Mr. Thomas W. LaSalle B. The Edina Office Limited Partnership I and II (For Phase I and II Office Buildings, Respectively) Purpose: To supervise and coordinate the acquisition, financing, subdivision, and development of the office portion of the overall development. Partners: 1) York Edina Partnership, consisting of: (a) Winfield Developments, Inc. (b) Laukka, Inc. (c) Jarvis, Inc. W w 2) (a). Mr. Henry Hyatt (b) Mr. Sheldon L. Baskin (c) Mr. Daniel N. Epstein 3) (a) Mr. Thomas W. LaSalle C. Partners for Senior Communities Purpose: To supervise and coordinate the acquisition, financing, subdivision, and development of approximately two hundred (200) residential housing units for the elderly. Partners: 1) Mr. Henry Hyatt 2) Mr. Sheldon L. Baskin 3) Mr. Daniel N. Epstein 4) Mr. Manuel S. Kramer 5) Mr. William DeWoskin Consulting Partner: York Edina Partnership Construction /Construction Management Bor -Son Construction Company Site Planning and Architectural Design I. BRW Responsibilities: Overall Master Planning; development of residential "townhouse" concept; office and office parking planning and architectural design; elderly and elderly parking planning and architectural design; city park and park parking planning and architectural design; overall site engineering. II. Cunningham Architects Responsibilities: Residential "townhouse" refinement. III. Custom One Responsibilities: Residential "townhouse "refinement and design. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM I. City Park and Park Parking A public, City park of approximately three acres, including an approximate one (1) acre enclosed structure. 300 public parking spaces. II. Residential Approximately 400 townhouse /condominium residential units to be constructed in up to six phases. Approximately 600 underground, private parking spaces to be included. III. Elderly Housing Approximately 200 rental units for elderly occupancy in one building of approximately 17 stories with related covered and surface parking. Tenant services to include congregate dining facilities serving two meals a day per person, linen and housekeeping service, and social programs. Building to also include a public restaurant and a child day care facility. IV. Office Approximately 205,000 square feet of office space to be constructed in two phases. Phase I to consist of 107,000 square feet in a 7 story building, and Phase II of 98,000 square feet in a 6 -8 story building, together with related covered and surface parking. ALLOCATION OF CITY PARTICIPATION 5/3/84 IN RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (400 Units) Phase I: Land (7,100 x 55 units) $390,500 Interest on Land (11/1/84 to 7/1/85) 27,400 Site Work (4,457 x 55 units) 245,135 Interest on City Site Improvements (1/1/85 to 7/1/85) 12,257 SAC (425 x 55 units) 23,375 Park Dedication Fee (568 x 55 units) 31,240 Construction Interest (2,000 x 55 units) 110,000 Transfer from Office 126,500 Total $966,407 $17,571 /unit Phase II: Land (7,100 x 100 units) $ 710,000 Interest on Land (11/1/84 to 7/1/86) 124,600 Site Work (4,457 x 100 units) 445,700 Interest on City Site Improvements (1/1/86 to 7/1/86) 22,285 SAC (425 x 100 units) 42,500 Park Dedication Fee (568 x 100 units) 56,800 Construction Interest (2,000 x 100 units) 200,000 Transfer from Office 230,000 Total $1,831,885 $18,319 /unit Phase III: Land (7,100 x 100 units) $ 710,000 Interest on Land (11/1/84 to 7/1/87) 199,400 Site Work (4,457 x 100 units) 445,700 Interest on City Site Improvements (1/1/81 to 7/1/87) 22,285 SAC (425 x 100 units) 42,500 Park Dedication Fee (568 x 100 units) 56,800 Construction Interest (2,000 x 100 units) 200,000 Transfer from Office 230,000 Total $1,906,685 $19,067 /unit Phase IV: Land (7,100 x 100 units) $ 710,000 Interest on Land (11/1/84 to 7/1/88) 274,100 Site Work (4,457 x 100 units) 445,700 Interest on City Site Improvements (1/1/88 to 7/1/88) 22,285 SAC (425 x 100 units) 42,500 Park Dedication Fee (568 x 100 units) 56,800 Construction Interest (2,000 x 100 units) 200,000 Transfer from Office 230,000 Total $1,981,385 Phase V: Land (7,100 x 45 units) Interest on Land (11/1/84 to 7/1/89) Site Work (4,457 x 45 units) Interest on Site Work 0/1/89 to 7/1/89) SAC (425 x 45 units) Park Dedication Fee (568.x 45 units) Construction Interest (2,000 x 45 units) Transfer from Office Interest on Office Transfer (7/1/88 to 7/1/89) Total Total City Participation (Phases I -V) $19,814 /unit $319,500 157,000 200,565 10,028 19,125 25,560 90,000 103,500 10,350 $935,628 $20,792 /unit $7,621,990 $19,055 /unit 5/3/84 -DEVELOPMENT COSTS TO BE FINANCED BY TAX INCREMENT BONDS To Date Phase I Phase II -V Total Site Improvements - -- $ 680,000 $1,700,000 $2,380,000 Park & Park Parking -- 5,151,000 - -- 5,151,000 Residential Contt. Interest - -- 110,000 690,000 800,000 Land 4,215,000 - -- - -- 4,215,000 Total Development Costs $4,215,000 $5,941,000 $2,390,000 $12,546,000 Repayments to T.I. District Elderly - -- $ 280,000 -- $ 280,000* Office - -- 423,500 616,500 1,040,000* City -Wide Park and Parking Benefit - -- 5,151,000 - -- 5,151,000 Total Repayments and Benefits to City $69471,000 Total Developments Costs $12,546,000 Repayments and Benefits 6,471,000 Residual Benefits to Residential (400 For -Sale Units) $ 6,075,000 $15,188 /unit Elderly Participation ** Mortgage Interest Reduction 1987 $100,000 1988 -2006 $170,000 /yei * Does not include interest carry on land or City financed site improvements. **Interest reduction payments repayable with interest upon sale, refinancing, or payment of the first.mortgage. TO: FILE FROM: James Van Valkenburg DATE: February 7, 1984 RE: EDINA HRA On February 2, 1984, a meeting was held with the developers and city personnel to hear the new proposal. Essentially the new plan is as follows: The North 2 /3rds of the property would have 400 home units which would be no higher than three stories and would be designed for a Europeon Street scene type of arrangement. They would have equity participation. The Southerly part would consist of two office buildings for a total of 200,000 square feet of office and an elderly high rise of 202 units. The park would be in between and tied in with each of those. The elderly would be 17 stories and would have their own parking. Each of the office buildings would have their own underground parking and the residential would as well. The attempt on parking is to increase the underground parking so that there would be less parking on the surface. The park would have 41,500 square feet and incorporate many of the items suggested before. In the elderly it would have a full service restaurant which would also be open to the public. It could be used for banquets in the park and that would be in place of a catering service that had been planned. The first stage of construction would be 52 units of residential, 104,000 square feet of office, the elderly, the park and the parking. The new member in the team is Henry Hiatt who will be primarily in charge of the senior or elderly building. The plan is to meet on February 16th and 23rd and to bring before the Council at its March 5th meeting a general presentation on the plan. This would not be for approval but in order to keep the Council advised as to the status of the same. James Van Valkenburg n� L J 4 ION MAP N U M B E R LD -84 -7 Harlan Stronq L O C A T 10 N 5209 -11 Malibu Drive Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls Cougar Addition EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 2, 1984 LD -84 -7 Lot 1, Block 1 of Parkwood Knolls Cougar Addition Generally Located: East of Malibu and North of Telemark Refer to: Attached survey The applicant requests a party wall division of an existing two family dwelling on Malibu Drive. Individual sewer and water connections are provided. Recommendation Approval c � 610 W Co I .' l • t� oa I 35.12 1M�S: Gwcia.r wuL .. -ems- \ �� 1 V . 3te4 54./O L 1 441'4 , E711AIn'7•�/ "Mv � W 60 SURVEY FOR: HARLAN STRONG DESCRIPTIONS: (Northerly Parcel) That part of Lot 1, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS COUGAR ADDITION lying north of a tlne running from a point in the west line of said lot therein distant 73. 18 feet south of the northwest corner of said lot to a point in the east line of said lot therein distant 75.08 feet south of the northeast corner of Said lot. (Southerly Parcel) Lot 1, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS COUGAR ADDITION, except that part thereof lying north of a line running from a point in the west line of said lot therein distant 73. 18 feet south of the northwest corner of said lot to a point in the east line of said lot therein distant 75.08 feet south of the northeast corner of said lot. We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said land. Dated this 29th day of February, 1984. E GAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. r Surveyors_ by NOTE: Bearings shown are assumed. Minnesota Registration No. 9053 e� lk a t-i x(00 OWNER (S) : PETITION FOR LOT DIVISION DATE: A / _y- ADDRESS: PHONE: milW— ZBFK - ?2-1-33S-3 The original tract of land proposed to be divided is described as follows: The following parcels will be made from the division of the above described tract of land: S -e_ -tam Signature of Owner s r , 1,14,¢�•4D "�✓ 5 23 46 i 884 I PARCEL A o. fl 1 o co PARCEL B "•�� 00 0` ko h Dra�ngJ� E"'se I., e n W/o w/o ` 2. tip• � `, �'p �� \ '� f J \� s v l for C4r\ \22-4. �z3 ID GAR. F! P, \ \ 9 01.7 i i ! I / 99 q O -15 d:33o b%'� x`\16 b1 . 29./8 � p q ..' i C��RT STAKES � r v •o� n <.i •. Lor AREA = ?-8,640 sg.-P. HOUSE ArzEA =4428 s$.- '4.=1$.4(,% Top of Focc,idaT;on * 902.0 (�s.rct.je Floor' $nsetmerrr• Floor= $9 3. c4 Proposed EEleva•t ;oils Q Ex ; s-rin9 E levat;ons Dra;nale Direenans -- I)en,res L,-r- Corner O .. -.... CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I heresy certify that on Q/ 1 / f3j I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat is a correct representation of said survey. Colvin H. Hedluna, Minn. Reg. No. 5942 J� RESOLUTION APPROVING MUIR WOODS THIRD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Muir Woods Third Addition ", platted by Edwin L. and Dorothy J. Sisam, husband and wife, and Americana State Bank of Edina, a Minnesota corporation and Norwest Bank Bloomington, National Association, a national banking association and Banco Mortgage Company, an Iowa corporation, and presented at the Regular Meeting of the City Council of May 7, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 1984 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of May, 1984. Acting City Clerk RESOLUTION APPROVING NORMANDALE BLUFFS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Normandale Bluffs ", platted by Duncan B. and Karen K. Wallace, husband and wife, and Norwest Bank Minneapolis National Association, a National Banking Association, and presented at the Regular Meeting of the City Council of May 7, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 1984 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of May, 1984. Acting City Clerk it C CIjE r IRCIE v O PAM 0" �+ > CIR m = c Q Q > pASS vet Cr 11 PA�U E i o> I t I a Z C s o u Cr � Q • m = , i + ' t H t t) � I Yr.�•.� j *�L;.•� ��t 1.i,l jam'•, � ■ �• BALLPARK i .- '*'COMPLEX ~� �`��'` ` B R A E M A R P A R Z .l °��.:•:' GOLF N U M B E R S -84 -4 Sisam L O C A T 10 N Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods Generally located west of Valley View Road and west of Mark Terrace Drive extended. REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT L'c PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR MUIR WOODS THIRD ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. sir. Hughes presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for property generally located west of Valley View Road and west of Mark Terrace Drive extended.' The subject property measures 71,688 square feet and is zoned R -1 Single Family Dwelling Dis- trict. It is developed with a single family dwelling located slightly north of the center of the lot. The proponent is requesting a subdivision of the property to create one new buildable lot on the southerly portion of the property. The new lot'would measure 29,428 square feet with about 90 feet of width at the required setback line. The remaining developed lot would have 42,260 square feet with`a width of approximately 150 feet at the building line. The subject property, as well as others in the Muir Woods plat, is characterized by fairly steep slopes and heavy woods. The lots are large with the homes maintaining an average setback of 120 feet from Valley View Road. Mr. Hughes advised that the request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on February 29, 1984 and the Commission recommended approval of the subdivision conditioned upon a slight re- adjustment of the proposed dividing line in order to allow the new lot to conform .to the minimum lot width required by Zoning Ordinance. Staff would recommend preliminary approval conditioned upon the lot line adjustment and subdivision dedication. The proponent, Ed Sisam of 7100 Valley View Road, advised that there is a restrictive covenant on the property filed with Hennepin County, which states that it needs approval of all the people in the area for subdivision. He stated that written consent has been obtained from all except one property owner. At this time he is requesting the approval of the City for the right to subdivide. Whitney Peyton, 7000 Valley View Road, asked what the life of the deed restriction would be in view of recent Supreme Court decisions. Attorney Erickson responded that the City's position has been to look at lot divisions as to whether they are or are not in the public interest of the City, and that the City does not concern itself with private restrictions. No further comment being.heard, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to the lot line adjustment and subdivison dedication as recommended by staff: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR MUIR WOODS 3RD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled "Muir Woods 3rd Addition ", platted by Edwin L. and Dorothy J. Sisan, husband and wife, and presented at the Regular Meeting of the City Council of March 19, 1984, be 'and is hereby granted preliminary approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. I" SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: _.1 fI?I1<f- IKX )�I-'> LAND SIZE: �f G'P� GLiT LAND (By. Subdivision No O Date: ;z. —lr ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land L—I B. dedicate % of the land 0"C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the.first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. M2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 0 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. r75. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. E 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 29, 1984 S -84 -4 Sisam, Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods Generally located: West of Valley Vi.ew Road and West of Mark Terrace Drive extended. Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and statement of neighbors The subject property measures 71,688 square feet as is zoned R -1, Single Family Dwelling District. The property is developed with a single family dwelling located slightly north of the center of the lot. The proponent is requesting a subdivision of the property to create one new buildable lot on the southerly portion of the property. The new lot would measure 29,428 square feet with about 90 feet of width at the required setback line. The remaining, developed lot would have 42,260 square feet with a width of approximately 1.50 feet at the building line. The subject property, as well as others in the Muir Woods plat, is characterized by fairly steep slopes and heavy woods. The lots are large and the houses are set back an average of 120 feet from Valley View Road. Developments to the west and east are characterized by similar terrain and much smaller lots. Recommendation The subject property, like most properties in the Muir Woods plat, appears suitable to subdivision. The lots are very large and most dwellings are positioned off center. Although the proposed subdivision will somewhat disrupt the existing spacing of homes west of Valley View Road, a dwelling on the new lot would still be in excess of 100 feet from the next dwelling to the south. Although the proposed lot exceeds the Zoning Ordinance area minimums, it would be slightly too narrow under the revised Zoning Ordinance standard for lot width. The new Ordinance measures lot width at a point 50 feet from the front lot line. The proposed lot would be 72 feet at that point. In order to correct this and to maximize the lot area of the new lot, Staff would suggest that the new lot line be adjusted 10 feet to the north along its entire distance. This would result in a lot width of approximately 100 feet at the required setback. Staff recommends preliminary approval conditioned upon the above mentioned lot line adjustment and subdivision dedication. 3A it that -- b•3in,7 a record orm!ner of one or more lots co.zt3inad in block 1 of lfijir 'roods 5ubdlvi_sio i , City of Edina, Iinnapin County, ilinnesota, do hereby give consent to t'1c rccor3 o*,anPr o?^ hloc'c 1, lot 3 Huir Joo-is to subdivide; thair said lot. p , F t = too t I' T i N U M B E R S -83- 2 Normandale Bluff L O C A T 10 N Generally located west of Rolf Avenue and south of West 64th Street. REQUEST E± INA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I ♦ R r. v , r O ? 0 U1 N ♦i ♦ I 5o /3-6.00 N 89 ° 18'00 C- rjo C J V,7,eTy %Z OF LOT /O O 10 Zo 3o bo 90 SGALE /N FEET C DENOTES //ROY/ MONUMENT BEAR /Ak�5 SNoWN ARE ASSC -/MED l� I lj J J I 'v I J -7 /35. o0 I N 89 ° /6'oo "E LI 2 THE 5OU-rl-/ G /NE OF THE NaeTH /1Z'OF LOT % V^ I � I � I i �J L� El, 8 Y 2 Q 0 I �. O c.. W U J ♦ THE AICI L /NE of Lo7• �O. ` /35•0o N89° /goo "E g 8 TF+E SoUT{! LANE FEET O THE No2TH /O F GOT I0. G. iJ OUTLOT A rjo C J V,7,eTy %Z OF LOT /O O 10 Zo 3o bo 90 SGALE /N FEET C DENOTES //ROY/ MONUMENT BEAR /Ak�5 SNoWN ARE ASSC -/MED l� I lj J J I 'v I J I LI 2 l JI i V^ I � I � I �J N �I♦ c� J �v I �. lk c.. i n �J rjo C J V,7,eTy %Z OF LOT /O O 10 Zo 3o bo 90 SGALE /N FEET C DENOTES //ROY/ MONUMENT BEAR /Ak�5 SNoWN ARE ASSC -/MED NOW- LANDALE BLUFF PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED Mr. Hughes recalled that Council had requested staff to prepare Findings, Decisions, ill and Reasons for preliminary plat approval of Normandale Bluff on June 6, and that �"I the matter had been continued from the June 20 meeting at the request of the \ \' proponent. Mr. Louis Oberhauser, attorney for Mr. Wallace, the property owner, 1 1 asked the City Council to consider a simple lot division of Lot 7, whereby the iortherly 25 feet would be attached to Lot 6, and the southerly 25 feet would be lttached to Lot 8. He noted that such a procedure would result in a 75 foot wide lot and a 150 foot lot without the expense of replatting. He added that Mr. Wallace was willing to grant the City a deed restriction on the southerly 150 foot lot limiting it to only one single family dwelling. Mr. Oberhauser explained that he and his client felt that the 150 foot southerly lot had considerable value. and that it is very unlikely economically that Mr. Wallace would want to restructure the house to acquire an additional building site. He concluded that their proposal was a good compromise in that 1) it recognized that City Council only wanted two building sites there and 2) it allowed Mr. Wallace to preserve a sizeable lot which he could be in a position to sell for a- maximum return. Robert Price, 64TZ -_RoTf- Avenue; raised the question as to why the proponent was not attending the meeting. He also commented that in his opinion a deed restriction was not a firm proposal, and also that finances should not play a part in the decision. Mr. Oberhauser noted that Mr. Wallace and his wife were out of town. John Eickman, 6408 Rolf Avenue voiced concern that Mr. Wallace had not been sensitive to the needs and desires of his neighbors, and he recommended that the deeding of 15 feet to the City for parkland appeared to be a natural extension of Mr. Wallace's lot and should not prove to be detrimental. Mr. Oberhauser responded that none of the previous replats in the area, to his knowledge, had ever required a dedication of parkland. Mr. Richards pointed out that the City's proposed Findings were exact- ly as Mr. Wallace's current proposal as far as creating two lots, one buildable, and one with an existing structure on it. Mr. Richards noted, however, that the proponents suggestion may allow the creation of another lot in the future. Mr. Oberhauser indicated that with existing zoning and lot size requirements, the Council would be free to make that change in the future. Mr. Bredesen stated iat he didn't see any detriment that would come to Mr. Wallace as a result of .:he subdivision dedication requirement outlined in the Findings. Mr. Oberhauser responded that a 150 foot wide.lot is of substantially more value than the 135 foot wide lot which would result after dedicating 15 feet to the City. Mr. Oberhauser expressed that the City was not being fair with Mr. Wallace by asking him to give up some of his land to prevent him from obtaining what is permitted under Statutes and City Ordinances.' Mr. Oberhauser said that if the City had an obligation of giving Mr. Wallace two building sites on the 150 foot lot, then in his opinion, the City was asking Mr. Wallace to waive his legal rights to placate the neighbors who have opposed the issue. Member Turner offered the follow- ing resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL NORMANDALE BLUFF = BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Findings, Decisions, and Reasons as appended to these minutes are hereby adopted and that certain plat entitled, " Normandale Bluff" as presented by Duncan Wallace and Karen Wallace for prelimin- ary approval on July 11, 1983, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The garage for the existing dwelling located on the Subject Property must be remodeled to provide a five foot setback from the south lot line of Parcel A and to conform to all other ordinances of the City of Edina. 2. The south 15 feet of the Subject Property shall be dedicated to the City by Warranty Deed and free and clear of all encumbrances as a subdivision dedication as required by the Edina Platting Ordinance. Motion for the adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Mr. Oberhauser asked if it would be agreeable with the Council if Mr. Wallace, in lieu of making a land dedication, made a cash dedication. The Mayor advised that the motion was made with the intention of 15 feet being dedicated to the City of Edina. City Attorney Erickson made it clear that the motion was made to require a land dedication. Mr. Oberhauser then asked for a reconsideration of COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 1, 1983 S -83 -1 Normandale Bluff, Generally located west of Rolf Avenue and south of West 64th Street Refer to: Past Staff Reports and attached Revised Preliminary Plat,. April 27 minutes The Commission considered subdivision proposals for this property on March 2, March 30 and April 27, 1983. On April 27, the Commission recommended approval of a subdivision plan which would result in the creation of three lots measuring 75 feet in width and 10, 125 square feet in area. A substantial remodeling of the existing dwelling on the site was required in order to achieve such a subdivision. On May 16, the City Council reviewed the subdivision plan recommended by the Commission. The Council referred the request back to the Commission with the instructions that it reconsider a plan which would result in only one additional homesite on the property. In response to the Council's request, the proponent has submitted the attached revised plan. This plan illustrates one new lot to the north of the existing dwelling. As before, the existing dwellings garage would be converted from three stalls to two stalls in order to provide the required 75 foot width for the new lot. The proponent states that the remodeling of the south side of the dwelling is not longer under consideration and, thus, no new building site south of this dwelling is proposed. (The Commission should recall that this southerly lot relies only on the grant of a setback variance by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments. Although the proponent states no intention of pursuing this variance now, he or a new owner of the property may elect to pursue this request at a later date.) Recommendation In my view, the Commission has the following options: 1. Reaffirmation of its April 27, 1983, approval. 2. Approval of the proponent's present request. 3. Approval of one new lot measuring 62 feet in width and located to the south of the existing home. Such a lot would be approved without the necessity of remodeling the existing home (except the deck) as previously proposed. 4. Approval, of one new lot measuring south of the existing home. Such a remodeling of the existing dwelling. 5. Denial 75 feet in width and located to the lot would require the substantial Community Development and Planning Commission June i, 1983, Meeting Page two Considering the direction of the City Council, I believe that the proponent's present request would be the most prudent alternative to consider. The north lot has two important advantages compared to the south lot. First the north lot does not exhibit the topography and drainage problems of the south lot. Secondly, the substantial remodeling of the existing dwelling would not be required. (The garage would, of course, still require modification) . The advantage of the south lot is that it may be viewed as less of an intrusion into the existing neighborhood. Staff reommends approv =sl of the proponent's present requ(ist conditioned upon 1.) remodeling of the garage; and 2.) su.- :)division dedication. >Y Fz J�, - /35 00-7 I i4 4 Iq o� 17.5 SQ. Fr. 1 �I Parcel IN L. Lot o, anc B10CK 10, .;o: I Provos -v LO r UAJ a �• 1 —� Lot 7, -7 / W tnereof, 10 or Lot 91 Adaition _Q' 1 W Lot 9, ex O 1 / tnereof, anc I 0 Block 10, Nor zz Parcel B. i J A' ' N •59% � � wt j � / f 159.93 T- M o ;4.2 �jt- 2 IN, �:ll 0/� 0/ 2 0 "j,01 i T, p Na " 217.5• 30 I- V, S 89*5 O,f 2,756 1 6 3 3. Par} ;ii I e - a "V- -, , Q L/"f Rot 6A W 1p cL 1 V89*4945",y , 1 4 1 3 2:' 2 4 W 144 2 kl- I Z ix j..L9 Z M89 °4 '45 "W - iPARKLAN I 0 VIEW Z, i;� < LLJ C/) 1 3 Ca 4 S7� 4C N 19 W. ss 81 0z 211.5 135C7 Li A'89i49'30 w IN 5 s 0 • 4 10 9 8 L 7 kly, 24, 1 1 ;%4,f /es 93 WA AR ES 6 RDEN 2 RIDG50CLP 3 MC 4 IT. 100 190 GR R��kA EW z�A 30 2 4 4 2 6 6 W41 2 5 2. 5.,� c ,;a , , 7 2 7 1 - . ,% , "T r4 N 8 8 OJTLOT I 7 232.5 10 4W' lu Z "V AV 4:4 A 12 T 935 33 3z 65,J6 40 :4io6 " C IN! '55,10 Nr ;C4 14 < Lo,� 45 140.66 "d, 0 2 33, 14 �,,4RDL`IV A 9,,f- e'.' qp ACeCe 15 19 Ui 9 go iC4 37.4 DOG NO—. 3 38 V,' 653.3 40 "15 Pir 6PO VE ST ROBERT L. BAKKA ACREAGE N. E .4 Couhty , Surveyor. RESOLUTION VACATING PART OF GARDEN AVENUE WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 2nd day of April, 1984, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed street vacation for road purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of May, 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or other- wise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the street be and is hereby vacated: That part of Garden Avenue as platted in Garden Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as lying between a line 27 feet north of and parallel with the south line of the North half of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21 and a line 264 feet north of and parallel with said south line of the North half of Section 32. and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. bi I� SCALE: 1" = 30' iPi 7 -� - -. /G 9• Gtr �. S S9�z3 �SZ 1-✓ M PRQ -POSED DIVISION PLAT FOR: Halley Land Corporation DESCRIPTION OF WESTERLY PARCEL: Lot 5 and the west 1.5 feet of Lot 6, Block 1, OAK RIDGE OF EDI�,IA. Area is 18, 291 square feet. DESCRIPTION OF EASTERLY PARCEL: Lot 6 except the west 15 feet thereof, Block 1, OAK RIDGE OF EDINA. Area is 11, 992 square feet 9 RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 2nd day of April, 1984, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for drainage and utility purposes; and WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 7th day of May, 1984, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said easement vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described drainage and utility easement be and is hereby vacated: Lot 5 and Lot 6, Block 1, Oak Ridge of Edina and that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. III -C TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM :,FRANCIS HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINEE VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SUMMIT AVE. VACATION -After further review on the proposed vacation of Summit Avenue, we would recommend the following: A. Vacate portion of Summit Avenue right -of -way and six foot strip per concept approval of townhouse zoning. B. Reserve easements for utility companies who have facilities on the right -of -way. C. NOT vacate southerly portion of Summit adjacent to service station to preserve control of area, particularly in light of parking restrictions that may need to be imposed. D. Require the townhouse owners and association to provide routine maintenance of the southerly portion of Summit Avenue and indemnify City against claims. D. The vacation will become effective on the issuance of a building permit for the second phase of the townhouse project. Additionally, a separate policy issue on the re -sale of the right -of -way should be addressed by Council. Currently, we do not sell vacated right -of -way or easements to the gaining parties. FJH:Im 5/4/84 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 2, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Tree Trimming of public property trees -in Edina as described: Area bounded by Highway 100 on the West, 50th Street on the North, the Eastern City Boundary Line ion the East and the Southern City Boundary Line on the South. Quotations /Bids: Company 12 "& Under over 12" Ave. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Midwest Stump $20.00 52.00 43745 Total $37,450.00 540 Greenhaven Rd. Anoka, MN 55303 2. United Tree Service .$22.00 $47.00 $39.90 Total $34,433.70 5609 Olson Memorial Highway Mpls., MN 55422 3, Tri -State Tree Service $25.00 $59.64 $48.99 Total $42,285.00 1509 West 89th St. Bloomington, MN 55431 Department Recommendation United Tree Service ,14 Gto G 7 c Ou p-1 c wcaw_ Ii c-tt G,a Signa r Departifibnt Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase, .,r4. uaien, finance Director. city MM haaer's Endorsement: U V 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and the purchase. P recommend Council approve 2. I recommend as an alternative: _ V M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 4, 1984 TO: City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes -, City Planner SUBJECT: Weed Harvesting - Mirror Lake and Mill Pond Staff has recommended that the City not accept the apparent low quotation for the subject projects as offerred by Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters. Instead, we recommend award to Midwest Aqua Care which submitted higher quotations. Our reasons are as follows: 1. The City is not bound by the Statuatory procedure for bidding because the estimated cost for each job is less than $10,000. Therefore, we are not bound to accept low bid. 2. The low bidder was not responsive to the specification (see attached letter) . These specifications requested that a descri.pti.on of the equipment to be used and a proposed schedule for the work accompany the bid. No information was submitted. 3. The equipment proposed for the work does not meet our requirements and is not acceptable. Upon inquiry, Staff was advi.sed that the harvestor proposal for use was fabricated by the bidder this past winter and is, therefore, not a "commerical weed harvestor" as required. 4. We believe that the low bid is not "responsible" within the meaning of the low and we cannot reasonably expect that the work can be satisfactorily completed. The equipment proposed for use is "homemade" and to our knowledge is untested and untried. When asked to supply a photo of the equipment, the bidder responded that it was not completely assembled at this time. We, therefore, recommend award to Midwest Aqua Care which was responsive to the specifications and possesses equipment which conforms to our requirements. Midwest Aqua Care has demonstrated their ability to complete such projects satisfactorily in past years. GLH /Ide rITY OF EREDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 April 16, 1984 Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters 2408 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, iv1N 55391 Dear Sir: We are interested in obtaining quotations from you for weed harvesting in three Edina lakes and ponds in 1984. These lakes and ponds are: Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond Mirror Lake Indianhead Lake The locations of these lakes are shown on the enclosed map. Also enclosed are aerial photographs showing the lakes and their surroundings. Your quotations for the Mi.nnehaha Creek Mill Pond and Mirror Lake, should be based on two harvestings, the first to occur during the first one -half of June and the second to occur during the last one -half of August. Your quotation for lndianhead Lake should be based on only one harvesting to occur the first half of July. Please provide your quotations for each lake separately. You need not provide quotes for all three lakes. Your quotation should include the removal from the lake of all weeds which are harvested and their transportation to a disposal' si.te outside of Edina. Please include with your quotation a proposed schedule for the work and a description of the equipment which will be used.. The successful bidder must utilize a commerical weed harvestor equiped with a conveyor system for retrieving and transporting weeds to the shore. If you are interested in providing a quotation glad to meet with you to discuss the project. ySinceL. Hughes' City Planner for this work, I would be Thank you. P.S. We would appreciate receiving your quotations by May 3, 1984. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth P.osland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEP,1 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 7, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Harvesting of Mirror Lake Quotations /Bids: Company Amount o Quote r Did 1. Midwest Aqua Care $9,860 2. Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters $8,400 3. Department Recommendation: Midwest Aqua Care as Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters did not provide a responsible quotation. VlodonL. Hughes Planning Sianature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: ' The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. J. Pl. Dalen, Finance Director City'Mananer's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: n eth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manaper SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITETI IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 7, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Harvesting of Mill Pond Quotations /Bids: Company �^ Amount Quote or Did 1 • Midwest Aqua Care $9,150 2. Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters $8,400 3. Department Recommendation: Midwest Aqua Care As Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters did not provide a responsible quotation. Gordon L. Hughes Planning Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bird is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. �J. N. Dalen, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and the purchase. recommend Council approve 2. I recommend as an alternative: enneth Rosland, City Manager FROM CJeoweecA T_7,� ,23 2►�o g Cos�o Poir-ri- Rood VJck'i 40 , r-1 N Slot, 1 (e, 1zl 4.7 1 _ (;k i,-1 c PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO Name C.Xj:�'j e'.4- FA ;nn Street 4801 West _V�6' City E ol,na State MrP Proposal No. p k Page No. Date Apr. 1g8►{- WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT X11ontrL Cq Lcike, S#4 et T`! mO-nhn LPPK K11 I h rl , M't irr-r�r UQ\K? City Ed �r,c, State MN Date of Plans cJ�mrnPr o� 1gRt* Telephone 917 - 88b1 I Architect We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of QpP i"1nrY��1 ir1 c�r� \�cl�nntn�c� 1 o K� C r�r n- - n rep!�� 65, '1 or 1c.KP hcA4 -cam All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of „___ I I with payments to be made as follows: •. &7 ■. ! ■ �.•: .• • • • .■:' ■ g Rte_ � Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, acci or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen' Com ensation and Public Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by o Respectfully submitted Per NOTE - This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within ��j days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted Signature Date Signature �. Form M 23-181 jAidwest dr .r, r �{ i[,- April 30, 1984 TO: City of Edina FROM: Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. RE: Price Quote for Weed Harvesting at Mirror Lake. COST: $4,930.00 per harvest (17 acres) x 2 = $9,860.00 Total Cost COST INCLUDES: - Cutting and removing the vegetation from the water. - Disposal of the cut vegetation away from the working site. - All mobilization fees. The city shall provide equipment i.e., front -end loader, to assist in the launching and retrieval of equipment. Respectfully submitted, Thomas J. Gert-•z" President Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. .rr+� A0- I I A '-wnr Ieie- - AenA nAIrAK1 -7 f11\ rr\1KIA 1%OKI r_c,tne_ /tAn%nnn '%C7-7 idViest April 30, 1984 TO: City of Edina FROM: Midwest Aqua Care,. Inc. RE: Price Quote for Weed Harvesting at Edina Mill Pond. COST: $4,575.00 per harvest (16 acres) x 2 = $9,150.00 Total Cost COST INCLUDES: - Cutting and removing the vegetation from the water. - Disposal of the cut vegetation away from the working site. - All mobilization fees. The city shall provide equipment i.e., front -end loader to assist in the launching and retrieval of equipment. Respectfully submitted, _G' e Thbomas J. Gertz President Midwest Aqua Care, ?.Inc. A AI11%errfPT A/1I IA 0`A r%r IA 1/^ - AC^A nAIrA AI-7 nr1 % rmikiA 11 AK1 Cr'A1117 -If [Ar'1�/1 r1 �1 •f f-'79 14idvles Y .xi2 (t'a �' ^A. rs �J��4 i April 30, 1984 Mr. Gordon Hughes, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: Please find enclosed the price quotes and required information for weed harvesting at the Mill Pond and Mirror Lake. Harvesting Equipment: 1984, National Car Rental, Mud Cat harv- estor. The Mud Cat cuts a 7' swath and stores 450 cubic feet of vegetation. - 1979 Altosar harvester. The Altosar cuts a swath 5'6" and has a storage capacity of 260 cubic feet. Each machine is propelled by independently reversible paddle wheels allowing for shallow water harvesting and manuverability around waterway obstructions, i.e. docks, shoreline contours. Both aquatic harv- esters are commercially manufactured. Shore Conveyor: 1983, National Car Rental, Mud Cat shore conveyor. The shore conveyor transfers the cut vegetation directly from the harvesters to a disposal truck. Midwest Aqua Care uses 2 dump vehicles for disposal. Completion Time: Mill Pond,. 4 - 6 days. Mirror Lake, 5 - 7 days. Midwest Aqua Care can guarantee same day removal of all of the cut vegetation. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, Thomas J. Gertz, - President Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. Encl. %AIMFq/r ITT A O'NFin '-nnr Ipl/- -ACnA n A I F7 Rl'f nr1 rr-, IAIA KAKI CCAI) C GAn\ no) n 71Z-7-7 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 4, 1984 TO: City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner SUBJECT. Weed Harvesting - Mirror Lake and Mill Pond Staff has recommended that the City not accept the apparent low quotation for the subject projects as offerred by Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters. Instead, we recommend award to Midwest Aqua Care which submitted higher quotations. Our reasons are as follows -: 1. The City is not bound by the Statuatory procedure for bidding because the estimated cost for each job is less than $10,000. Therefore, we are not bound to accept low bid. 2. The low bidder was not responsive to the specification (see attached letter) . These specifications requested that a descri=ption of the equipment to be used and a proposed schedule for the work accompany the bid. No information was submitted. 3. The equipment proposed for the work does not meet our requirements and is not acceptable. Upon inquiry, Staff was advi.sed 'that the harvestor proposal for use was fabricated by the bidder this past winter and is, therefore, not a "commerical weed harvestor" as required. 4. We believe that the low bid is not "responsible" within the meaning of the low and, we cannot reasonably expect that the work can be satisfactorily completed. The equipment proposed for use is "homemade" and to our knowledge is untested and untried. When asked to supply a photo of the equipment, the bidder responded that it was not completely assembled at this time. We,, therefore, recommend award to Midwest Aqua Care which was responsive to the specifications and possesses equipment which conforms to our requirements. Midwest Aqua Care has demonstrated their ability to complete such projects satisfactorily in past years. GLH /Ide "' of IREDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 April 16, 1984 Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters 2408 Casco Point Rd. Wayzata, NIN 55391 Dear Sir: We are interested in obtaining quotations from you for weed harvesting in three Edina lakes and ponds in 1984. These lakes and ponds are: Minnehaha Creek frill Pond Mirror Lake Indianhead Lake The locations of these lakes are shown on the enclosed map. Also enclosed are aerial photographs showing the lakes and their surroundings. Your quotations for the Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond and Mirror Lake should be based on two harvestings, the first to occur during the first one -half of June and the second to occur during the last one -half of August. Your quotation for lndianhead Lake should be based on only one harvesting to occur the first half of July. Please provide your quotations for each lake separately. You need not provide quotes for all three lakes. Your quotation should include the removal from the lake of all weeds which are harvested and their transportation to a disposal' si.te outside of Edina. Please include with your quotation a proposed schedule for the work and a description of the equipment which will be used. The successful bidder must utilize a commerical weed harvestor equiped with a conveyor system for retrieving and transporting weeds to the shore. If you are interested in providing a quotation glad to meet with you to discuss the project. Since yr� j or on L. Hughes' City Planner for this work, 1 would be Thank you. P.S. Vie would appreciate receiving your quotations by May 3, 1984. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITE14 IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 7, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Harvesting of Mirror Lake Quotations /Bids: Company Amount o Quote r Bid -1. Midwest Aqua Care $9, 860 2. Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters $8,400 3. Department Recommendation: Midwest Aqua Care as Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters did not provide a responsible quotation. VlodonL. Hughes Planning Sianature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended..bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. 1. Dalen, Finance Director Ci�ty %�,anaaer's Endorsement: 1� 1. I concur with the recommendation e dation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: n eth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council I FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITSI IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 7, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Harvesting of Mill Pond Quotations /Bids: _ Company Amount f n toue or Bid 1 • Midwest Aqua Care $9,150 2. Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters $8,400 3. Department Recommendation: Midwest Aqua Care As Minnetonka Seaweed Eaters did not provide a responsible quotation. Gordon L. Hughes Planning Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. _alen, Finance Director City Mananer's Endorsement: ' 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: enneth Rosland, City Manager r FROM Proposal No. p \3Z M�nne�cnK4 SeoWce:C� �v�rs Page No. 2►+o g Casco Po�c�-t- R«,� V�1gya4 �a M f1 S3q 1 Date io PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO WORK TO BE PERFORMED AT /� �ian\-eocl Lrika � Name l .X�-T_t�� -�nct S-tfget M,r,nQMbQ rMeP s M;jj t--*�'rV4 M'Irrnr k UKc► Street 480\ West �'�-� City Eci,r,c1 State MN City E cLna State 1MrA Date of Plans of 1IkR!* Telephone 97-"7 - 881=1 Architect We hereby propose to furnish all the materials and perform all the labor necessary for the completion of "O esAr 1 oF 5 Q� �ronte4l ,n ors \nc1�n_�1ead Ln K� C-1- 04- n Aer,4+, c& Fi' or 1c Ka inn44,rtirn All material is guaranteed to be as specified, and the above work to be performed in accordance with the drawings and specifications submitted for above work and completed in a substantial workmanlike manner for the sum of n-11— ,Q with payments to be made as follows: Any alteration or deviation from above specifications involving extra costs, will be executed only upon written orders, and will become an extra charge over and above the estimate. All agreements contingent upon strikes, acci or delays beyond our control. Owner to carry fire, tornado and other necessary insurance upon above work. Workmen' Com ensation and Public I f Liability Insurance on above work to be taken out by o Respectfully submitted Per NOTE • This proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 50 days ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. You are authorized to do the work as specified. Payment will be made as outlined above. Accepted Date �. Form # 23781 Signature Signature idwts r_ 14 �i. it ,< �fto April 30, 1984 TO: City of Edina FROM: Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. _ RE: Price Quote for Weed Harvesting at Mirror Lake. COST: $4,930.00 per harvest (17 acres) x 2 = $9,860.00 Total Cost COST INCLUDES: - Cutting and removing the vegetation from the water. - Disposal of the cut vegetation away from the working site. - All mobilization fees. The city shall provide equipment i.e., front -end loader, to assist in the launching and retrieval of equipment. Respectfully submitted, Thomas J. Gertz' President Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. AAIr��eirnT �1 / \��A nAMr* IAIP- -A Cr% A RAI rAA17 MM f r-Of.IA AA%I rrA�$C 4A 7e97 .stn, idvlts r_ r � 3 ray, April 30, 1984 TO: City of Edina FROM: Midwest Aqua Care,: Inc. RE: Price Quote for Weed Harvesting at .Edina Mill Pond. COST: $4,575.00 per harvest (16 acres) x 2 = $9,150.00 Total Cost COST INCLUDES: - Cutting and removing the vegetation from the water. - Disposal of the cut vegetation away from the working site. - All mobilization fees. The city shall provide equipment i.e., front -end loader to assist in the launching and retrieval of equipment. Respectfully submitted, Thomas J. Gertz President Midwest Aqua Care,i.Inc. •e�r'��e.rnT w��w /-1A mr' I 10— _ALnA r%Al r hl7 nn rrNI%IA AAdI rrA -lr_ /L An \/'1nn OG-/-! r� lt4CORpORATED M; April 30, 1984 Mr. Gordon Hughes, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street _ Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: Please find enclosed the price quotes and required information for weed harvesting at the Mill Pond and Mirror Lake. Harvesting Equipment: 1984, National Car Rental, Mud Cat harv- estor. The Mu Cat cuts a 7' swath and stores 450 cubic feet of vegetation. - 1979 Altosar harvester. The Altosar cuts a swath 5'6" and has a storage capacity of 260 cubic feet. Each machine is propelled by independently reversible paddle wheels allowing for shallow water harvesting and manuverability around waterway obstructions, i.e. docks, shoreline contours. Both aquatic harv- esters are commercially manufactured. Shore Conveyor: 1983, National Car Rental, Mud Cat shore conveyor. The shore conveyor transfers the cut vegetation directly from the harvesters to a disposal truck. Midwest Aqua Care uses 2 dump vehicles for disposal. Completion Time: Mill Pond,,4 - 6 days. Mirror Lake, 5 - 7 days. Midwest Aqua Care can guarantee same day removal of all of the cut vegetation. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you. Sincerely, Thomas J. Grertz, President Midwest Aqua Care, Inc. Encl. �. AAIr\ \o /rrT 1A / oknr INI/- - AcnA nAt rAA17 nr\ rMIkIA nnnI -)C-f'! CITY OF E Ir!!�/ I N A 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDiNA. MINNESOTA 55423 612 - 927 -8861 PVC07 TTTTlIAT Original to Dennis Morris Henn. Cty. Property Tax Div. Sent: 5/24/84 WHEREAS, the lot described as PINS No. 33- 117 -21 -22 -0067, Lot 1, Block 6, Westchester Knolls, is a lot for which the City of Edina does not desire to control, and WHEREAS, that parcel has been listed by the County as tax - forfeited property owned by the State of Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the parcel cannot be developed but is properly attached to the land of abutting property owners, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the County of Hennepin place this parcel of land on private sale, and that the sale of that land be limited to abutting property owners for attachment thereto. ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and Acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the above Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 7, 1984 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. I WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 24th day of May, 1984. { Acting City Clerk 71g; �' TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL J1 FROM: FRANCIS HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINEER # VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: FEASIBILITY REPORT, 84 -2 - SET HEARING DATE The following improvements have been investigated and it has been determined that they are feasible, and their construction would be in the best interest of the overall development of the City of Edina. IMPROVEMENT AND LOCATION ESTIMATED COST P -BA -262 Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb and Gutter and Bridge Replacement W. 44th Street from Soo Line Railroad to T. H. 100 $356,063.23 This project would be a State -Aid funded project with a special assessment to abutting property owners. The proposed hearing date would be May 21, 1984. P- AQ -84 -3 Weed Harvesting Indianhead Lake $10,400.00 This project would be assessed with some proposed general fund contribution.as in past harvesting projects. The proposed.hearing date would be May 21, 1984. FJH:lm 5/4/84 J...� T� M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL FROM: MARK BERNHARDSON, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGERI\t SUBJECT: SPECIAL ASSESSMENT, BA -248 DATE: MAY 4, 1984 On September 19, 1983, the City held the special assessment hearing for Street Improvements on Grove Street; improvements that were originally petitioned by Mr. Meineke and Mr. Peterson. Prior to the assessment hearing, Mr. Meineke and others being assessed were given 30 days notice of the hearing. Mr. Meineke was not in attendance at that hearing, and sub- sequently contacted the City in late January or early February this year regarding the assessment on the property Lot 2, Block 2, Warden Acres, Peterson Replat. (It was this lot on which we had been denied a change of zoning from R1 to R2 back in 1980). As noted in Mr. Meineke's letter, he has now come back and feels that his assessment was not proper and that is in part based on the fact that 45% of the lot in question is.covered by electrical transmission line and was in part the basis for original denial of the R2 zoning. He felt that at the time of denial there was an indication from one Council member that consideration be given him in the assessment because his R2 zoning was denied. In reviewing the minutes on the hearing of the R2 zoning, however, we were unable to find any reference to consideration for the special assessment. From a legal standpoint, Mr. Meineke had ample time to communicate with the City Staff and /or Council regarding the assessment prior to being assessed. Once assessed, however, the Council is not legally able to re -open a hearing unless something illegal or improper was done. These assessments were put on the records November 15, 1983, in order to include it on the tax state- ments that year, sent out in January for payment in May and November. Given the fact that these assessments have been spread on the records, any consideration that the City gives Mr. Meineke will need to come out of City funds. (Mr. Erickson is presently reviewing the City's authority to spend public funds in such a manner). The consideration Mr. Meineke is looking for is that his measured front footage be stopped at the beginning of the cul -de -sac since he was denied the R -2 zoning. Staff, however, would not recommend this since this would be a deviation from City policy and it would require that we treat the property owner on the north side in a similar manner from an equity stand- point. (About $1,600 /lot) We do feel that in reviewing the matter there are two other ways to calculate his front footage. The first is a straight line across the cul -de -sac which was the way Mr. Smaby, property owner on the north side of the cul -de -sac was treated. (Method A). � D-'Ae, - Memorandum to Mayor and Council Special Assessment, BA -248 Page 2, May 4, 1984 The second way being the way to measure. the footing around the curve which would result in a difference of 12 feet between the two methods. Such a 12 foot difference would result in approximately a.$515 difference. The around the curve method is appropriate for our normal policy, particularly if he would have received R2 because of the potential party wall split to" the two lots. Mr. Meineke was assessed because of the potential for R2 zoning which we did not feel was the case with Mr. Smaby around the curve. (Additionally, the City did not have the right -of -way to the Smaby property at the time of the public hearing. Thus, a straight line distance was selected for the Smaby property). It is Staff's recommendation that since Mr. Meineke had ample opportunity prior to the assessment that he.not be granted any relief in this matter. Should, however, the Council feel that relief is in order on an equity basis with his neighbor across the street, that would amount to relief of $515. The Staff does not however, feels he is entitled to the $1600 that he has alluded to in discussions with the City Staff. Should you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. MEB: jkm (�U Pr 5417 Grove street :Edina, tad 55436 February 2, 1 -84 City of Edina Attn: City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Gentlemen: Recently I received the real estate tax statement for Lot rr2, Block r2, Warden acres, Peterson Replatt (5409 Grove St.) Yesterday I reviewed the assessment billing with the City Engineer and the Assessor's office, concerning an apparent oversight in the taxes assessed to this development. Lot #2, Block 72, is the lot on which the city council previously turned down my application for rezoning to double dwelling. The reason that my application was tsned down is that 45;-' of the Lot is an easement for the Electric transmission line. Also, I was advised that because of this limitation on the building lot, the development of the cul-de -sac would be assessed to all property owners on Grove Street. Your records will reflect that I deeded a portion of this land to the city prior to the development of Grove Street. Please review the assessment on that lot and revise the tax statement accordingly. I'm awaiting your prompt reply. Sincerely, Evans R. Meineke EDINA PARK May 8, 1984 7:30 p.m. Edina City Hall AGENDA I. Approval of Minutes of April 10, 1984 Meeting Ii. Report - Metropolitan Open Space Commission and Presentation by Commission Member - Bill Barbeau III. Speed Skating Rink IV. Edinborough Park V. Recreation Report EDINA PARK BOARD April 10, 1984 5:30 p.m. Members Present: Joan Lonsbury, Chairperson, Jim Fee, Bob Christianson, George Warner, Bill Lord, Don Wineberg, Jean Rydell, Staff Present: Rick Jacobson Others Present: Donna Hipps Joan Lonsbury called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. I. Approval of Minutes of March 13, 1984 meeting Motion was made by Bill Lord and seconded by Jean Rydell to approve the minutes of the March 13th meeting. Motion carried. II. TOUR OF PARKS AND FACILITIES The following facilities and parks were visited: Highlands Park Bredesen Park Edina Golf Dome Arneson Acres Sr. Center Art Center Tour concluded at Edina City Hall. Meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. SPECIAL PARK BOARD MEETING May 3, 1984 Subject: Edinborough Park EDINA PARK BOARD May 3, 1984 5:00 p.m. Edina City Hall Members Present: Joan Lonsbury, Chairperson, Bob Christianson, Bill Lord, George Warner, Marilyn Wooldridge, Andy Montgomery, Jim Fee Staff Present: Bob Kojetin Others Present: Donna Hipps, Miles Lindberg A special Park Board meeting was held Thursday, May 3 for a presentation of the Edinborough Park. A presentation was given by Miles Lindberg, representing BRW. At the end of the presentation, each Park Board Member was given an opportunity to give his or her concerns in regard to the Edinborough Park project. All members gave a favorable concensus that the project should be approved. The concern expressed by Bob Christianson was if after the project has been completed for a few years, would there ever be money taken from the general Park Operations fund to maintain the Park. George Warner voiced the same concern. Andy Montgomery questioned the naming of the facility as a park when really it seemed to him it was a facility, but not knowing what type of.a facility it should be named, has been given the name of "park ". George Warner also mentioned that he hoped that there would-be a good visible entrance to the park off_of the parking lots so people would know they were. walking into the park and not into an office building. M.N. 3 -14 -84 ART CENTER FUND Statement of Income and Expense City of Edina For Years Ending December 31, 1983 and December 31, 1982 INCREASE 1983 1982 DECREASE* INCOME: Memberships. Registration Fees Donations Merchandise Sales Less: Cost of Merchandise-Sold Other Total Income OPERATING EXPENSES: Personal Services: Administration Instructors Maintenance Dues and Subcriptions Advertising Light and Power Telephone Heat Office Expense Rubbish Removal Printing Insurance and Alarm System General Supplies Central Services Audit Repairs Other Total Operating Expense Profit (Loss) Before Depreciation Provision For Depreciation Net Profit (Loss)- 3 -23 -84 b.j. $ 6391.50 $ 5065.95 $ 1325.55 49801.10 41274.14 8526.96 9442.66 22529.65 12955.02 884-75* (4828.11) (5182.00) 353-89* $ 7242.16 S 7771_n2 _ gin 09* $ 7 1 74514.49 $ 79235.15 $ 4720,66* 30189.59 26970 42 3219 17 21.00 145.75 124.75* 2095.51 2240.83 145,32* 5594.09 5068.00 526 n 1984.25 1767.36 216.89 1160.58 330.91 829.67 6471.67 6059.64 412.03 1640.74 4609.97 2969.23* 5220.00 3780.00 1440.00 100.00 100.00 -0- vf_ a• Lz/ JLO. UU 28.00. 388.55 360.55* $ 28207.16 $ 27205.09 $ 1002.07 19521.01 $ 10573.04 8947.97* 13166.81 1610.02 11556.79 $ (32687.82) $ (12183.06) $ 20504.76* GUN RANGE FUND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1983 REVENUE: Range .Fees : Rental of Property Rifle Pistol Trap Firearm Safety Instruction Sale of Ammunition Sale of Scrap Lead Sale of Brassards and Targets Vending Machine Other Total Revenue OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and Wages: Supervision and Clerical Maintenance Light and Power Telephone Insurance Supplies Repairs Concession Commodities Ammunition Targets Central Services Other Total Operating Expenses Income (Loss) Before Depreciation Provision for Depreciation M.N. 3 -27 -8 12/31/83 12/31/82 INCREASE DECREASE* $ 5672.71 $ 3928.21 $ 1744.50 710.50 1380.00 669.50* 1883.00 3006.00 1123.00* 6123.75 7689.50 1565.75* 54.00 200.00 146.00* 14443.96 16203.71 1759.75* Net Income (Loss) $ (8851.31) $ (9584.69) 733.33 bj 3 -30 -84 2227.50 2829.75 602.25* -0- -0- -0- 84.65 178.70 94.05 425.55 818.51 392.96* 227.47 241.57 14.10* 46.00 85.00 39.00* 17409.13 20272.24 2863.11* Net Income (Loss) $ (8851.31) $ (9584.69) 733.33 bj 3 -30 -84 10755.95 15239.30 4483.35* 56.69 58.32 1.63* 10812.64 $ 15297.62 $ 4484.98* $ 3277.16 3145.25 131.91 566.87 353.09 213.78 46.00 85.00 39.00* 559.76 967-79 408.03* 1169.55 -0- 1169. 27.00 1011. 9-84.45* 1232.34 4307.53 3075. 1T* 4138.70 4496.58 39'7.88* 1080.00 -0- 1080.00 240.00 95.00 145.00 23150.02 $ 29759.31 $ 6609.29* 5740.89 9487.07 3746.18* 3110.42 97.62 3012.80 Net Income (Loss) $ (8851.31) $ (9584.69) 733.33 bj 3 -30 -84 SWIWbIING POOL FUND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA Year Ended December 31, 1983 and.December 31, 1982 REVENUES Pool Fees: Season Tickets General Admissions Rental - Instruction Program Other OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries and Wages: Supervision Life Guards Cashiers & Clerical Basket Room Attendants Watchmen_ Maintenance Light and power Heat Telephone Rubbish Hauling Insurance Repairs Cleaning supplies Water Treatment General Supplies Audit Printing and Office Expense Central Services Other Total Operating Expenses CONCESSIONS Sales Cost of Sales Gross Profit Operating Expenses Net Income Provision for Depreciation Net Income (Loss) bj 3/27/84 MN 3/14/84 1983 1982 Increase JV`F. or_ — * 66216.63 $ 61526.02 $ 4690.61 • , 2761.02 •1 lub.93 118.90 9.97* 82600.77 $81230.87 1369.90 $ (16384.14) 919704.85) 3320.71 $ 19175.66 $ 16480 17 $ 2695.49 6908.60 5628.86 127c 7a (21822.77) V-15763.08) $ 6059 a 69* MN 3 -21 -84 RECREATION CENTER FUND STATE ENT OF INCOME A14D EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA For Years Ended December 31, 1983 and December 31, 1982 REVENUE Season tickets Retail sales Concessions Daily skating fees Spectator fees Ice Rental Services - Skate Sharpening Vending machine commisssion Skate & Locker Rental Other OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and wages Manager City clerical, cashiers & ticket Police takers Maintenance Organist Concession labor Total Salaries and 1!1ages Mileage and conferences Printing - tickets, notices Laundry Telephone Light and power Fuel and heat Rubbish Eauling Cleaning Supplies Lumber & Paint General supplies Equipment maintenance & repairs Central services Food & soft drinks purchased Insurance & Alarm System Audit Other Total Contractual Services and Commodities Total Operating Expenses INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND DEPRECIATION (LOSS) Interest on bonds Interest on loan - Liquor Fund TOTAL INTEREST INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE DEPRECIATIO14 Provision for depreciation NET INCOME (LOSS) Bonds Paid X10 bj 3 -27 -84 1983 1982 INCREASE $ 30 310. $ 97945.99 $ 11364.43 $ 179221.82 $187033.79 $ 7811.97 306757.84 302974.84 41 3783.00 $ 2552.58 $ (5028.85) $ 7581.43 3665.10 5503.10 1838.00* -0- -0- -0- $ 3665.10 5503.10 * 1112.52 $ 10531.95) 5 9419.43 47083.98 3204.53 43879.45 81 0 13736.48 4i 34460.02 $ 60000.00 $105000.00 M.N. 3 -26 -84 GOLF COURSE FUND STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA For Years Ended December 31, 1983 and December 31, 1982 REVENUE Membership Fees Green Fees: 18 holes 9 holes Par 3 Golf car, cart & Club rental Locker Rental Golf Lessons Other OPERATING EXPENSES Administration Salaries and Wages: Manager Pro Rangers and Starters Cashiers & Clerical Printing and Advertising Golf Car Rental Supplies Insurance and Alarm System Retirement, Insurance, Office Supplies, etc. Mileage and schools Audit Other Total Administration Building - Clubhouse and Pro Shop Salaries and Wages Telephone Water Fuel Light & Power Laundry 30% Less: Amount charged to Grille Repairs - building Rubbish Hauling Insurance Supplies - Other Total Building - Clubhouse & Pro Shop Maintenance of Course and Grounds Salaries and Wages: Superintendent Maintenance Golf Car Maintenance Irrigation System Telephone Light and Power Fuel Fertilizer and Chemicals Sand, gravel and rock Concrete and asphalt Sod, tree replacement, etc. -L-umber Repairs Supplies Equipment Operation Golf Car Maintenance Irrigation System Other Total Maintenance of Course and Grounds Total Operating Expenses Total Operating Income 1983 1982 INCREASE DECREASE* 45354.63 -43465.01 889.62 37560.00 40260.00 2700.00* 1758.22 883.26 874.96 800.00 800.00 -0- 1964.15 382.05 1582.10 138311.75 118611.33 19700.42 $ 34554.92 $ 32431.35 $ 2123.57 $ 223674.22 $ 241589.24 $ 17915.02* 396540.89 392631.92 3908.97 $ 73984.52 g 83620.66 g 9636.14* GOLF COURSE FUND (con't) Range 1983 1982 $ 93840.59 $ 88U140. i 4i 5794.42 Net Income - Range 35668.33 $ 33854.67 1813.66 INCREASE Income on Investments 3980 76 Grille DECREASE* Net Income - .Operating Department 97417 87 80086.68 Personal Services Contractual Services 66669.67 31055.95 13417.01 Commodities $ 80U8b.68 3 42951.89 47767.90 Income Before Interest and Net Income - Grille 77117.19 $ 21914.42 84939.70 S 12418.17 Z5 7822.51 $ 9436.25 Net Income - Operating Depreciation $ 154071.20 $ 80086.68 50290 33 $ 3780.87 Interest on Bonds Interest on Loan - Liquor Fund 14966.10 18774 00 3807.90* Total Interest Income Before Depreciation _0_ 14966.10 18774 00 3807 90* Provision for Depreciation _ $ $ 139105.10 $ 131516.33 -$ 7588.77 47439.64 $ 23515.51 $ 23924 13 Net Income $ 91665.46 $ 108000.82 $ 16335.36* Range Income Less: Operating Expenses $ 93840.59 $ 88U140. i 4i 5794.42 Net Income - Range 35668.33 $ 33854.67 1813.66 58172.26 $ 54191 5_0____T 3980 76 Grille Income Less: Operating Expenses 99031.61 97417 87 1613 74 Personal Services Contractual Services 83 73.53 31055.95 2682.42* Commodities 5791.77 6115.85 3 42951.89 47767.90 4816.01* Net Income - Grille 77117.19 $ 21914.42 84939.70 S 12418.17 Z5 7822.51 $ 9436.25 Net Income - Operating Departments $ 80086.68 66669.67 13417.01 Bonds Paid $ 50000.00 $ 40000.00 v MINUTES OF THE EDINA ART CENTER BOARD HELD APRIL 18, 1984 BOARD PRESENT: Art Dickey, Jim VanValkenburg. Donna Skagerberg, Betty Paugh, Sharon Hale,-Betty Cater, Judy Smith, Sandy Clark STAFF PRESENT: Jean Adams, Mollie Paulson, Marion Ward, Rick Jacobson, Pat Greer Classes for Spring We have 30 classes running this Spring. Volunteer Awards Donna Skagerberg will introduce the recipients. Volunteer Luncheon It will be at Sandy Clark's home on May 11th at 12:00. The Board and Staff will share the cost of the event. Summer Classes Some new classes and workshops for the summer are: Bunny Humphrey's oil painting, special pottery classes in outdoor pieces and dishes, Erica Bouza's jewelry making, calligraphy for children and adults, watercolor painting by Judy Blain and Betty Hood Anderson, acrylics by Virginia LeFevere, puppetry by Margaret Gust, and stencil art. Committee Reports Mollie Paulson reported that the gift shop did $812.82 in business in the last two months and that the Henn. Co. Library is buying 4 to 6 prints from us for their permanent collection. Donna Skagerberg reported that their are 26 paid artists for "Art in the Park" so far. They are thinking about having a kazoo concert. Patpourri Newspaper is running a free announcement about "Art in the Park ". A paid ad in the Lutheran Journal was voted down. Donna would also like a bigger Art Center flag. Prices will be looked into. Marion reported that $855.00 was taken from the $1500 Foundation donation to pay for a new electric kiln. Sandy Clark again suggested a big sign for the Art Center where it would be visable. Marion suggested 3 banners in primary colors for the outside entrance. Jean Adams said the cost of a die for pins is $200.00. It was decided that this is too much. Jean also said that the invitations to the student show can't be run on the City Hall machine because it will not take heavy enough paper. Sharon Hale and Betty Paugh will be in charge of "Art in the Park" this year. They reported that "Berry Bob ", a food vendor, will be used again this year. The Garden Club will decide at their next meeting whether or not they will handle the fruit & Vegetable stand. They are looking for a group to handle the children's art section. They have the Sousa Band lined up. Marion Ward and Judy Smith will work on flyers and their distribution. Judy Smith will take over the membership responsibility on the Board. Norwest Bank would like us to pay for an ad that they would set up for the Scholarship Show. It was generally felt that this would be too expensive. THE NEXT MEETING WILL BE MAY 16TH AT 3:00. Ij M E M O R A N D U M TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION SUBJECT: MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 4, 1984 Since the memorandum dated April 24, 1984 was written, the Legislature passed Bill H.F. 1602 before adjournment. For the reasons stated on the memorandum, we are pleased that this effort to improve the Human Rights Department was successful. It is our intent to monitor the progress of the bill's implementation. We trust that you will want to be informed of this since the effectiveness of our Commission is directly affected 'by this legislation. Thank you for your support and interest. Canny Wright Doris Barman Co- Chairpersons Edina Human Relations Commission M E M O R A N D U M TO: EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS } ('�wQ IONS CO ISSION FROM: EDINA HUMAN RELAT MM �Tj �� SUBJECT: MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT DATE: APRIL 24, 1984 The members of the Edina Human Relations Commission urge your support of the rebuilding of the Minnesota Human Rights Department and the strengthening of the Minnesota Human Rights Law. For your information, please review: 1) editorials from the Minneapolis Star and Tribune dated February 3 and April 11, 1984, 2) a copy of the Bill Summary of H.F. 1602, 3) a copy of the letter received from Karen Klark, State Representative 60A, the Bills' sponsor. It is imperative that the rights of the citizen's of this state are protected by a law that is meaningful and by a strong Human Rights Department that can effectively address grievances and preserve an individual's rights. Without an effective Human Rights Department, Minnesotans are denied justice under the Human Rights law. The members of the Edina Human Relations Commission request your surveillance and.encouragement regarding these issues. We support the proposed legislation as individuals. We request your approval of this support so that we may affirm our support in our capacity as the Edina Human Relations Commission. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Co- chairpersons Edina Human Relations Commission Attachments 1�lsnnea� his Star and Tribune Established 1867 Roger Parkinson Publisher and President Joel R. Kramer Executive Editor Frank Wright Managing Editor /News Tim J. McGuire Managing Editor /Features :Robert J. White Editorial Editor 10A ;`k;` „ +,; Friday, February 3, 1984 To rebuild the Human" Rights Commission .. L For victims of discrimination, the rising backlog in of Administration, the other by a governor's task the state Human Rights Department has been more force headed by Minneapolis Urban Coalition Pres- than just annoying. Too often, the agency's sluggish ident Steve Belton — reveal just how muddled the response to complaints has wiped out any hope for agency's operations have become: The department justice.. Now that Human Rights. Commissioner .- lacks uniform procedures for com- irene Gomez - Bethke has resigned, .the way is clear "processing ,plaints; it sets no priorities_ for handling cases; it for Gov. Rudy Perpich to hire the ' kind of profes- , : 'often fails to conduct t thorough investigations; it sional manager who can hel g p •get thel.department makes poor use of time, resources and`staff. More - back on track. .L.t rover, the department has failed to adopt recom- t >, mendations for improving` efficiency made more Top - quality leadership for the department should "• than two years ago' by-016 legislative auditor's have been the governor's goal from the start. As office.a; two study groups noted In reports released last week, the department's problems have been long in 'he upshot is that Minnesotans who suffer discrimi -. the making. Ever since its creation in 1967,;- the . - ,:nation are being 46nied 14e ;help they deserve: To.. department has been unable to keep up With its { end that Injustice, the study groups recommend work. Its backlog of cases" tiiore than a year :01d , -Oat . a strong, professional" manager be hired. ° -,to stands at 2,237 — some of them filed more than .,''.reorganize the department •and clear up the back- - seven years ago. Finishing an investigation of one ` -log Gov.'Pecpich promises to follow that advice; as complaint takes the department more than a year. `. be 'should. But. he has already compromised' tils °was search for a new coinmis§ioaer by suggesting that –J".: , th at Gomez - Bethke unable to c[eai• the may be difficult to . find a 'qualified candidate ,up backlog is hardly surprising. Like most of her among women and minorities, the groups from predecessors, she had little experience in manage- which human - rights commissioners traditionally ment or human - rights enforcement. She apparently brave been recruited z' *�'' °t was hired mostly because she was female and Hispanic, not because she was qualified. Once in Perpich should put aside his worries and proceed .office, Gomez - Bethke faced a challenge that would with the search. in the meantime, he has provided -test the most seasoned professional: straightening Minnesotans a memorable irony: It is precisely out a muddled agency burdened with an ever- ". because of such unfair skepticism about women increasing number of complaints. and minorities — whether by a private employer, a landlord or a governor — that the state needs a Last week's reports — one by the state Department Human Rights Commission. '- ' Karen Clark District 60A Hennepin County Committees: Governmental Operations, Vice - Chair. Job Creation and Unemployment Subcommittee, Chair. Health and Welfare Local and Urban Affairs April 4, 1984 Dear Human Rights Supporter: Minnesota Reuse of Representatives' Harry A. Sieben, Jr., Speaker I'm asking for your help. I believe you are in a position to help make a difference in whether or not we will pass strong human rights legislation in Minnesota in 1984. As you may know, my House File 1602 and Senator Ember Reichott's, Senate File 1762 are bills which contain the recommendations from the Governor's Blue Ribbon Task Force on the Minnesota Human Rights Department. Additionally, they contain recommendations from the Les Soeurs Task Force on Human Rights. The bill has passed committee hearings, been amended differently in the House and in the Senate, and is "on the floor." I expect that it will come up for full floor debate within the next week or ten days. Because there was an attempt to amend out key provisions in the committee hearings, I expect those efforts will continue on the floor -- particularly in the House, since we were able to prevent those amendments. In the Senate we did lose several key provisions in the committee hearings which the author will attempt to amend back in some form. Enclosed is a packet I'd ask you to review and use as a resource to lobby for the bill. Note the TREBLE DAMAGES fact sheet. The bill requires that those found guilty of unlawful discrimination must pay three times the actual damages resulting from the discrimination. Unfortunately, major o position to this provision has develo ed in the business community. The Governor's Task Force considered this a key recommendation that would put some real "teeth" and enforcement into our law, encourage settlements, and encourage the private bar to take cases more often. I find it hard to understand why any business would oppose such a penalty unless they are planning to unlawfully discriminate. Note the listinS of all other precedents for treble damages in Minnesota law. Surely it can a argue ER-at human rights are as worth protecting as are the rights of animals, trees, etc. I ask you to please consider helping in the following specific ways: _. I. Make calls /write letters supporting the bill to your own legislators. Call 296 - 0504 /Senate Information or 296 -2146/ House Information for their names and addresses. 2. Help us to identify businesses that will support a strong human rights bill. Call in their names and addresses to my office and give us your information. Reply to: ❑ 255 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Office: (612) 296 -0294 ❑ 2918 Columbus Ave. S., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Home: (612) 822 -3526 Page 2 3. Write a letter to the editor of your town /city /organization's newspaper or newsletter supporting the bill. Include a plug for treble damages, lengthened statute of limitations, or other provisions. Personal stories of discrimination may be helpful. 4. Use the networks of your organizations to generate support. 5. Call back the results of contact with your legislators. rLLAZ�L: rnLs will tielp Senator Reichott and me now when and if we have the votes to pass the bill. Timing is very critical. (You can leave a detailed message with our secretaries if we are not available to take your call.) I might also note that it is wise to leave a message with your legislator's secretary if he /she is not available. , Tell them why you are calling and your request for their support of the bill. Time is of the essence! We adjourn April 20. Please help in whatever way you can. Be creative if you have other ideas I have not suggested. Just Let us know of your results - positive or negative. Keep in mind that the bill has the strong, broadbased support of many organizations and individuals, as well as the Governor's Blue Ribbon Task Force. Governor Perpich strongly supports the bill and has been personally lobbying on its behalf. Thanks for your assistance. If possible, get a buddy to work with you to double your efforts and together we will pass this very important, critically necessary bill. Most Sincerely Karen Clark State Representative 60A KC:jc r� HOUSE RESEARCH .. - Bill Summary H F 1602 - First Engrossment S.F. SUBJECT: Human Rights Act Amendments AUTHORS: K. Clark, Staten COMMITTEE: Judiciary DATE: 4/5/84 Section 1. Waivers Prohibited•. Prohibits any attempt to make an individual waive rights or remedies under chapter 363. Sec. 2. First Class Mail. Permits use of first class rather than certified mail for sending copies of a charge. (Same change is made in sections 4, 6, 9 and 10.) Sec. 3. Limitation Period. Changed from 6 months to 300 days to match federal law. Stops the time running while parties engage in private dispute resolution dfforts. Requires the potential respondent to notify the depart- ment that such efforts are occurring. Sec. 4. Case Priorities; Sanctions for Delay. Top priority will be given to processing cases alleging actual or threatened physical violence. Other cases will have priority if they involve intentional reprisal; irreparable harm; opportunity to promote policies of the Act; a government respondent; substantial supporting evidence; or a respondent with several recent charges. Requires the commissioner to adopt policies to sanction intentional delay by any party. Sec. 5. Individual Representation. 180 days after a charge-is filed, if the department has not issued either a "probable cause or a "no probable cause" finding, the charging party can go to the hearing examiner himself or by a private attorney. Both parties will receive parts of the case files that are accessible under the Data Practices Act. If the charging party wins at the hearing, the respondent can be ordered to pay attorney fees. Sec. 6. Treble Damages. When the hearing examiner finds discrimination has occurred, compensatory damages in an amount three times actual damages will be ordered. Sec. 7. Attorney General on Appeal. A party who represented himself or had a private lawyer under section 5 and won, can ask the attorney.general to take the case if there is an appeal. Sec. 8. Local Limitation Period. Local commissions must allow filings within the 300 day limitation period in section 3. Legislative Analyst:. Deborah K. McKnight, 296 -5056 Phone: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 17 State Capitol Summary - H.F. 1602 First Engrossment Sec. 9. Same as section 2. 1 April 5, 1984 Page 2 Sec. 10. Court Suits. Party can go to court within 45 days after the cdmmis- sioner has determined that further use of department resources is unwarranted or within 45 days after a decision of no probable cause is reaffirmed. Sec. 11. District Court Relief. To be the same as what is available from the hearing examiner. Sec. 12. Act is effective August 1, 1984. filed after that date. Section 5 applies only to charges N9innea obis Star and Tribune Established 1867 Roger Parkinson Publisher and.President 'Y Joel R. Kramer Executive Editor Frank Wright Managing Editor /News Tim J. McGuire Managing Editor /Features Robert J. White Editorial Editor 18A i : Wednesday, Apiil 11 1984 .. TO Siren g then Minnesota's human-rights law For victims of discrimination, Minnesota's human .. of the federal human rights law. Sanctions would rights law is „the key to justice. But the key hasn't' •,be get 'for intentional'delay;`:and' case;; processing worked as it should, A governor's task force found would be speeded in other ways in January, that :citizens seeking recourse under the - r law often get � lost in the ,muddle at the ,Human The House bill would also set new priorities, giving ' Rights Department. Bills. sponsored, by Rep. Karen ' `top . attention to cases alleging threats, violence, 'Clark; DFL- Mpis., and Sen. Ember Reichgott, DFL- ' +,intentional reprisal or irreparable harm, ' Corp'- itobbinsdale, would help :clean.up the department. . plaints against government agencies and against The legislation should be passed., j„ '; ; respondents facing several recent charges would :.. � : , y also get prompt action r Since its creation h .1967, fhe Human Rights Dew partment: has been "c onsistently'behind in its work. ' ' . • ' The most controversial proposal; "includgd� iq the The backlog of discrimination complaints older House bill but weakened in the Senate measure, is ! than. a: year: stands'at more than 2,000.. - some of. also the most crucial: It would require those .found i them filed -five to seven years ago: January's study_ ' liable for unlawful discrimination to. pay !three 1 ' pinpointed' t*o. reasons for the disorder. The hu- - .'times. the actual damages ,resulting from 'the.. dW man -rights :law potent enforcement provi- ,• crimination. Some business people argue ;that ahe .lacks Mons,' and the ' department lacks 'strong. rules to : House provision "would ,encourage frivolous 'iftiga- ensure efficient processing of complaints. Renovat- tion. But experience with other'state statutes that ' ing the. law, the task force found, would improve. require " treble - damage -' awards contradicts' that the department's operation. ,•.- . '.�.... . ` \,.. .._� - claim. The. provision would likely discourage'dis -_, i r.. -.:�.; �_; .: -•.: r: -, , . .- :. r, ° crlmination, . encourage out -of -court - settlements The Clark- Reichgott bills, pending on the floors of and cri'ate an incentive for private lawyers to take both. houses, incorporate the task force's ideas. The discrimination cases. ' . bills would broaden the. law's reach by prohibiting employers, Aandlords and others from trying to The Clark- Reichgott legislation would help rebuild persuade ._citizens to waive their rights. The bills a healthy Human Rights Department. If passed :would stretch. the statute of limitations for filing a with the important priority- setting and treble -dam- discrimination suit from. 6 months to 300 days, ages provisions, it could also open the doors to thereby extending the. state deadline to match that justice for many victims of discrimination. r A G E N D A EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MEETING April 24, 1984 7:30 p.m. - City Hall 7:30 p.m. Call to order by Canny Wright Approval of Minutes of March 27, 1984 7:40 p.m. Guest - Mr. Steve Lepinski from Storefront /Youth Action. To report on accomplishments of 1983 and goals for 1984. 8:00 p.m. Chair Report 8:15 p.m. Interest Area Reports: 1. Seniors 2. Chemical Dependency 3. South Hennepin Human Services Council a. Family Violence b. Implementation Committee c. Transportation 8:45 p.m. Old Business 1. Youth Ministry Update 2. Human Rights Act Amendments 3. Letter regarding Presidential Security Directive #84 - Micki Gamer 9:15 p.m. New Business Enclosures: - Letter from State Representative Karen Clark -Bill summary of H.F. 1602 - Newspaper articles of interest MINUTES HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION March 27, 1984 Members Present: Micki Gamer Doris Barman Father Bauer - LaVonne Bigelow Joe Cavanaugh Pat Llona Fred Nelson Tom Oye Katherine Sehlin Judi Mollerus Goeffrey Workinger Canny Wright Members Absent: None Staff Present: Ceil Smith The meeting was called to order at 7:35 p.m. by Mrs. Barman. The minutes of the February 21, 1984 meeting were approved as written with a motion by Tom Oye, seconded by Katherine Sehlin. Motion carried. Chair Report Mrs. Barman reported that she had received information from Tom Custer concerning two bills dealing with human rights issues. It was suggested that individual Commission members contact Mary Forsythe indicating their support of these bills. Mrs. Wright will be preparing a packet of information concerning human rights issues that she will then present to the City Council. Additionally she indicated that she would call the Council Members and urge them to call the various members of the House and Senate in an effort to gain further support for the changes in the human rights laws. Mrs. Barman noted that she had received a letter from John Grecko, an employee of the Human Rights Department. Mr. Grecko indicated in that letter that he would be working with the no -fault grievance process, and it is his intention to contact all commissions that are currently involved in using the no -fault grievance process. Mrs. Barman inquired as to the interest of Commission Members for further training in the no -fault grievance process. Several members noted that they would like to receive the training and Tom Oye and Micki Gamer indicated that they would look into scheduling that training. Interest Area Reports Seniors: Mrs. Seh Church. The main focus for the elderly and the area. Mrs Sehlin noted A major discussion item and Medicare. lin reported that she attended a meeting at St. Albans of the meeting was a discussion of long term care housing possibility of constructing that type of housing in this that she had attended a pot luck dinner at Colonial Church. at that meeting was cost containment'of social security Canny Wright made a motion to commend Katherine Sehlin for all of the excellent work she had done to promote the expansion of VEAP into Edina. Pat Llona seconded the motion. Motion carried. Youth: No report. Human Relations Commission Minutes March 27, 1984 Chemical Dependency: Mrs. Llona noted that the last meeting of the Chemical Health Advisory Committee was held in February. At that time, Mr. Mike Wieland of the Poison Control Center, attended that meeting. Mrs. Llona offered the name of Barbara Reynolds as a replacement for Sandy Dunn who is leaving the Committee. Pat Llona made that motion, Micki Gamer seconded, and the motion was carried. One of the issues that has been recently discussed on the Chemical Health Advisory Committee at the suggestion of Barbara Reynolds, was that the Edina Liquor Stores create a place for non - alcoholic look - alikes to be sold in the liquor stores in an effort to offer an alternative to alcoholic beverages. South Hennepin Human Services Council: Tom Oye reported that the Family Violence Task Force is working on goals and objectives for this coming year. He indicated that they are also attempting to put together a resource directory. Mr. Oye noted that Cornerstone also now has representation on the Task Force. Mrs. Barman reported that the Implementation Committee Report has received approval of the South Hennepin Human Services Council. Mrs..Barman reported that she has received ihformation from MTC that expansion of Metro - mobility into western Edina would take place within the next 60 days. Old Business Youth Ministry Update: Joe Cavanaugh reported that the youth ministers met and came up with the following points. 1) That the schools can be a marketplace for some, but not all. i.e., Army recruiters are allowed to come into the schools, but the youth ministers are not. 2) The constitutionality of the issues. 3) Community growth and the ability of the youth ministers to help in that growth. 4) The importance of integration in the schools - integration of ideas, thoughts and philosophies. One of the concerns of the youth ministers was how the decision to eliminate the presence of the youth ministers in the schools was made. Another concern that the youth ministers have is the apparent lack of due process in the decision making. As to recommendations at this time, they are not proposing any and are waiting to see what type of alternatives Dr. Lieber will be presenting. Joe Cavanaugh expressed a concern for the need to have some type of group of individuals, be it ministers or lay people, that would be interested in forming a listening core because of the tremendous need of students to talk about their every day problems. New Business Mrs. Barman presented some information from a publication by The People for the American Way in which there was discussion of censorship of CIA employees via presidential directive in which any employee of the CIA, or for that matter the government in general, could not publish any of their memoirs or experiences without prior approval of the government. This is seen as censorship that should be looked in to and certainly questioned in the future. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Doris Barman - Chair Karen Clark District 60A Hennepin County Committees: Governmental Operations, Vice - Chair. Job Creation and Unemployment Subcommittee, Chair. Health and Welfare Local and Urban Affairs April 4, 1984 Dear Human Rights Supporter: Minnesota House ®f Representatives' Harry A. Sieben, Jr., Speaker I'm asking for your help. I believe you are in a position to help make a difference in whether or not we will pass strong human rights legislation in Minnesota in 1984. As you may know, my House File 1602 and Senator Ember Reichott's, Senate File 1762 are bills which contain the recommendations from the Governor's Blue Ribbon Task Force on the Minnesota Human Rights Department. Additionally, they contain recommendations from the Les Soeurs Task Force on Human Rights. The bill has passed committee hearings, been amended differently in the House and in the Senate, and is "on the floor." I expect that it will come up for full floor debate within the next week or ten days. Because there was an attempt to amend out key provisions in the committee hearings, I expect those efforts will continue floor -- particularly in the House, since we were able t those amendments. In the Senate we did lose several key in the committee hearings which the author will attempt in some form. on the o prevent provisions to amend back Enclosed is a packet I'd ask you to review and use as a resource to lobby for the bill. Note the TREBLE DAMAGES fact sheet. The bill requires that those found guilty of unlawful discrimination must pay three times the actual damages resulting from the discrimination. Unfortunately, major opposition to this provision has develo ed in t e usiness c mmunity. The Governor's Task Force considered this a key recommendation that would put some real "teeth" and enforcement into our law, encourage settlements, and encourage the private bar to take cases more often. I find it hard to understand why any business would oppose such a penalty unless they are planning to unlawfully discriminate. Note the listing of all other precedents for treble damages in Minnesota law- Surely it can be arguedt at human rights are as worth protecting as are the rights of animals, trees, etc.. I ask you to please consider helping in the following specific ways: 1. Make calls /write letters supporting the bill to your own legislators. Call 296 -0504 /Senate Information or 296 -2146/ House Information for their names and addresses. 2. Help us to identify businesses that will support a strong human rights bill. Call in their names and addresses to my office and give us your information. Reply to: ❑ 255 State Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Off Ice:-(612) 296-0294 112918 Columbus Ave. S., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55407 Home: (612) 822 -3526 _71*. Page 2 3. Write a letter to the editor of your town /city /organization's newspaper or newsletter supporting the bill. Include a plug for treble damages, lengthened statute of limitations, or other provisions. Personal stories of discrimination may be helpful. 4. Use the networks of your organizations to generate support. 5. Call back the results of contact with your legislators. PLEASE: is will help Senator Reic ott an me now when and if we have the votes to pass the bill. Timing is very critical. (You can leave a detailed message with our secretaries if we are not available to take your call.) I might also note that it is wise to leave a message with your legislator's secretary if he /she is not available. . Tell them why you are calling and your request for their support of the bill. Time is of the essence! We adjourn April 20. Please help in whatever way you can. Be creative if you have other ideas I have not suggested. Just let us know of your results - positive or negative. Keep in mind that the bill has the strong, broadbased support of many organizations and individuals, as well as the Governor's Blue Ribbon Task Force. Governor Perpich strongly supports the bill and has been personally lobbying on its behalf. Thanks for your assistance. If possible, get a buddy to work with you to double your efforts and together we will pass this very important, critically necessary bill. Most Sincerely Karen Clark State Representative 60A KC:jc -� HOUSE RESEARCH = Bill Summary H F 1602 - First Engrossment S.F. SUBJECT: Human Rights Act Amendments AUTHORS: K. Clark, Staten COMMITTEE: Judiciary DATE: 415184 Section 1. Waivers Prohibited. Prohibits any attempt to make an individual waive rights or remedies under chapter 363. Sec. 2. First Class Mail. Permits use of first class rather than certified mail for sending copies of a charge. (Same change is made in sections 4, 6, 9 and 10.) Sec. 3. Limitation Period. Changed from 6 months to 300 days to match federal law. Stops the time running while parties engage in private dispute resolution efforts. Requires the potential respondent to notify the depart- ment that such efforts are occurring. Sec. 4. Case Priorities; Sanctions for Delay. Top priority will be given to processing cases alleging actual or threatened physical violence. Other cases will have priority if they involve intentional reprisal; irreparable harm; opportunity to promote policies of the Act; a government respondent; substantial supporting evidence; or a respondent with several recent charges. Requires the commissioner to adopt policies to sanction intentional delay by any party. Sec. 5. Individual Representation. 180 days after a charge-is filed, if the department has not issued either a "probable cause or a "no probable cause" finding, the charging party can go to the hearing examiner himself or by a private attorney. Both parties will receive parts of the case files that are accessible under the Data Practices Act. If the charging party wins at the hearing, the respondent can be ordered to pay attorney fees. Sec. 6. Treble Damages. When the hearing examiner finds discrimination has occurred, compensatory damages in an amount three times actual damages will be ordered. Sec. 7. Attorney General on Appeal. A party who represented himself or had a private lawyer under section 5 and won, can ask the attorney.general to take the case if there is an appeal. Sec. 8. Local Limitation Period. Local commissions must allow filings within the 300 day limitation period in section 3. Legislative Analyst: Deborah K. McKnight, 296 -5056 Phone: Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 17 State Capitol Summary - H.F. 1602 First Engrossment April 5, 1984 Page 2 Sec. 9. Same as section 2. Sec. 10. Court Suits. Party can go to court within 45 days after the commis- sioner has determined that further use of department resources is unwarranted or within 45 days after a decision of no probable cause is reaffirmed. Sec. 11. District Court Relief. To be the same as what is available from the hearing examiner. Sec. 12. Act is effective August 1, 1984. filed after that date. Section 5 applies only to charges BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND FACTS you may find helpful in supporting H.F. 1602 and S.F. 1762. Statute of Limitations /Time for Filing Claim 10 states (20 %) now provide a longer .time to file the claim than does present Minnesota law. 2 (including Wisconsin) are 300 days 6 are 1 year 1 is 2 years 1 is 3 years ( North Dakota for work and credit discrimination) If Minnesota is to remain a leader in human rights legislation, an increase to 300 days is not extreme. Note also that .time is mea- sured from the date of the discriminatory activity and not from the time the person discovers discrimination. Mandatory Triple Damages: Precise language is important:, "Shall" means required "may" would mean discretionary and not required. There are a number of Minnesota statutory laws that require triple damage awards for violations. The attached list describes some situations requiring that triple damages be paid if violation is found. Other specific statutory law permits (uses "may" or "up to "), but does not require triple damages. In addition, some statutory law provides double damages, or achieves that effect. Statutes providing an amount greater.than actual damages are neither rare nor unknown in Minnesota. In addition, New Jersey award of triple damages in specific t permits an types of discrimination. The rationale for triple damages is based on public policy considera- tions. For example, triple damage awards are.provided where impor- tant rights are to be protected, where the - damaged person is to be encouraged to seek enforcement of those rights, where a balance of economic power between large and small is furthered by economic sanctions for abuse of that power, or where unlawful conduct can be discouraged by such sanctions. Remember that triple damages are not penalties, are not called puni- tive damages, and do not reflect criminal conduct. Triple damages are a means of creating respect for a law that protects important public policy considerations. As passed by House and Senate Judiciary Committees the bills contain Minot language differences at a few points and the following substantive differ- ences. H.F. 1602 Provisions Not in Senate Version (1) Charge investigation priorities (section 4). (2) Commissioner is to develop sanctions for unreasonable delay, which are not subject to chapter 14 rulemaking and can include increasing or decreasing the amount of an award (section 4). The Senate version provides sanctions for "intentional and frivolous delay" and does not contain the rest of the House provision (Senate section 4.). S.F. 1762 Provisions Not in House Version Gives a winning charging party interest at the statutory rate (9% in 1984) from the date the discrimination occurs for damages that can be readily computed and do not involve hearing examiner discretion (Senate section 6). This is pre - judgment interest and is not available in other lawsuits. DKM:cz xc: Julie Beck, Senate Counsel Minnesota " Stall Karen M. Baker House of Representatives sr� :`taureen Bellis — James D Cleary Gar, R. 'h Ken Dau 'Schmidt RESEARCH DEPARTMENT Mohamed Eldeeb Kerry Kinney Fine 17 STATE CAPITOL Marsha Gronseth John Helland ST. PAUL 55155 Director Stephen D. Hinze (612) 29( -6753, Carole Pagones Alan R Hopeman Associate Director Stan Jacobson Thomas M. Todd Kathryn Lamp April S 1984 p ' Legal Services Coordinator Deborah K. McKnight Joel T. Michael Joel T. Michael J Samuel W. Rankin Legislative Assistant Emily Shapiro Karin Johnson Mark Shepard Timothy E. Strom Thomas M. Todd John Williams Douglas S. Wilson TO: Representative Karen Clark L FROM: Deborah K. McKnight, Leg+ e Analyst RE: Comparison of H.F. 1602 and S.F. 1762 As passed by House and Senate Judiciary Committees the bills contain Minot language differences at a few points and the following substantive differ- ences. H.F. 1602 Provisions Not in Senate Version (1) Charge investigation priorities (section 4). (2) Commissioner is to develop sanctions for unreasonable delay, which are not subject to chapter 14 rulemaking and can include increasing or decreasing the amount of an award (section 4). The Senate version provides sanctions for "intentional and frivolous delay" and does not contain the rest of the House provision (Senate section 4.). S.F. 1762 Provisions Not in House Version Gives a winning charging party interest at the statutory rate (9% in 1984) from the date the discrimination occurs for damages that can be readily computed and do not involve hearing examiner discretion (Senate section 6). This is pre - judgment interest and is not available in other lawsuits. DKM:cz xc: Julie Beck, Senate Counsel MANDATORY TRIPLE (TREBLE) DAMAGES FACT SHEET MN. Statute 256B.121 three times the amount paid from public funds to a vendor of medical services where the vendor is in- eligible by making false representations. 334.18 relating to finance charges on credit sales - three times any finance charge for as long as the viola -. tion occurs (except unintentional act or bonafide error) . 626A.13 any person whose wire or oral communication is dis- closed where prohibited 'is entitled to treble da- mages, but in no event less than $1,000 recovery. 609.551 any person whose livestock has been rustled or sto- len can recover three times the actual damages. (plus costs and attorney fees) 481.07 & attorney who deceives court or a party to an action 481.071 is liable to-the injured party in treble damages. 17B.27 any person dealing grain fumigated or treated to affect the color shall be liable to any person in- jured in treble damages. 346.16 persons who permit the running at large of domestic animals are liable to persons injured for treble'' damages. 561.09 persons who permit the running at large or trespass of domestic animals or fowl within any city are liable to the persons injured for treble damages. 548.05 whoever removes, uses or destroys wood, timber, grass or personal property of another without author- ity, is liable to the owner for treble damages. 561.04 whoever without lawful authority cuts or carries off wood or tree or injures any tree or shrub on the land of another or on public ground is liable to the owner in treble damages. 90.301 whoever without a valid permit cuts timber on lands owned by the state is liable to the state in treble damages where willful but double only where casual and involuntary. On April 2, 1984, the Minnesota House of Representatives voted to recommend passage of H.F. 735 as amended. That bill relates to damages in cases where an insurance company provides unfair or deceptive service. It would permit recovery of the greater of $10,000 or three times the amount recovered on the underlying claim. It is in addition to any other remedies available. The roll call vote is furnished below. Those voting FOR have appro- ved this provision even in the face of anti - business climate problems. Those voting AGAINST may need help distinguishing the Human Rights legislation without reprimanding them for the insurance vote. Those who.voted in the affirmative were: Anderson, G. Ellingson McEachera Price Staten Battaglia Graba Metzen Quinn Swanson Beard Greenfield Minne Quist Tomlinson Begich Gustafson Munger Riveness Tunheim Bergstrom Halberg Murphy Rodosovich Vanasek Bishop Hoffman Nelson, D. Rodriguez, C. Vellenga Brandl Jacobs Nelson, K. Rodriguez, F. Voss Carlson, L Jensen Neuenschwander St. Onge Welch Clark, J. Kahn Norton Sarna Wenzel Clark, K. Kelly O'Connor Scheid Wynia Clawson Knuth Ogren Schoenfeld Speaker Sieben Cohen Kostohryz Osthoff Segal Coleman Krueger Otis Skoglund Eken Long Peterson Solberg Elioff Mann Piper Sparby "!Those who voted in the negative were: Anderson, B. Findlav Johnson Paul• Thiede Anderson, R. Fjoslien Kalis Pieplio Uphus Matz Forsythe Knickerbocker Redalen Valan Boo Frerichs Kvam Rose Valento Brinkman Gruenes Levi Schafer Waltman Burger Gutknecht Ludeman Schreiber Welker Carlson, D. Haukoos Marsh Seaberg Welle Dempsey Heat) McDonald Shaver Wigley DenOudf-n Heinin NfcKas%- Sherman Zaffke Dimler Himle Olsen Simoneau Erickson Hokr Omann Stadum Evans Jennings Onnen svig�=m The motion prevailed. Minne'p - OSis t _ S ar and Tribune ....... _ Established 1867 a. Roger Parkinson Publisher and president ^r` Joel R. Kramer Executive Editor ` ,Frank Wright Managing E ditor News s iTim 1 J. McGuire Managing Editor�Feetures Robert J. White Editorial Editor' ` 18A Wednesday, April 11r 1984 , M,4'" P ft Y�T, ! 'i. • }. -tr.l R�14 . "'Pr a . To strengthen Minnesota- s human- rights; aw For..victims of discrimination, Minnesota's human- .of the federal human - rights law:',Sanctlons would rights law is the key to justice. But the key hasn't..,:,be set' for intentional delay, and case processing worked as it should. A governor's task force found would be speeded in other. ways. in January that citizens seeking recourse under the „ law often get lost in the muddle at:. the Human ' The House.b;ll would also,set new priorities, giving Rights Department' . Bills sponsored by Rep. Karen ; `top attention , to cases 'alleging threats; violence, Clark, DFL- Mpls.; and Sen. Ember Reichgott,'DFL- intentional reprisal br irreparable harm' Com- Rolibinsdale; would help clean up the department. `. plaints against 'governcnent agencies. and ' against The legislation should be passed.,a respondents facing several recent charges would t. get, prompt action 1' �•,: Since its creation In ' 1967, the+ Human Rights . De- partment has'been_ consistently behind id its work 'The most controversial "pro- posal, jacluded� in' the . The backlog' of discrimination . complaints- older _ -.House bill but weakened in the Senate measure,..is than a year' stands at more than -2,000 - some of ; also the most crucial: It would require those found them' filed five to seven years. ago. January's study liable for unlawful "discrimination to •pay three pinpointed two reasons for the disorder: The hu- times the actual damages resulting from'the dis- nidn= rights „law ` lacks potent _ enforcement provi- crimination. Some business people. argue that the stohs, " and ' the department lacks $troag . rules to House._ provision would• encourage 'frivolous litiga-' ensure efficient processing of complaints. Renovat- tion..13ut experience with other, state statutes that ing the Jaw, the task force found," would improve ' require' treble - damage• ! awards"- co ntradicts • that' the department's operation..' claim. The provision would:Ilk6 discourage -¢is- ww"- �c�w : -� �.�;:x ^:der: crimination, encourage 'out -of -court .settlements The'Clark- Reichgott bills, pending on the floors of and create an incentive for private lawyers to take both houses, incorporate the task force's ideas. The discrimination cases. bills .would broaden the law's reach by prohibiting einpioyers, landlords and others from trying to The Clark - Reichgott legislation would help rebuild' persuade citizens to waive their rights. The bills a healthy Human Rights Department. If passed would stretch the statute of limitations for filing a with the important priority- setting and treble -dam- discrimination suit from 6 months to 300 days, ages provisions, it could also open the doors to t hereby extending the state deadline to match that justice for many victims of discrimination. Ar a ge. s. ree:area rinki 21 h 9' rest v. a•uran t, f... C. _. By Ellen Foley jears,. of 'our '.social responsibility Stuart Anderson's 6ittle'-6m chh1w Including posting, signs saying !*ff Writer \41.' .(relating, 1:6 liquor: sales), and this is with restaurants in Fridley and Min;-that the bartender will refuse to one measure of insuring it," said .'.netonka, does not have it. serve a, drunken patron, and In some �jhnesota'- legislators - may.- not -,be, Roger Thomson, vice president, of A.,t locatio4s providing free pamphlets able to agree on a provision to In- the legal department of Bennigah%l''Several 'other local restrauratits. about alcohol use. - crease the drinking age to 21 this a restaurant chain owned by the were contacted but managers said. -, ; I _. _,:� I I t._ 'i :, � isession, but three metropolitan-area Pillsbury Co. and headquartered. in 'they did not have such a rule, and Hewes'idd, his group4s - preparing restaurants apparently like it. Dallas. 0 - -, Arnold J. Hewes, executive vice programs encouraging'its'members president of the 1,200-member Min- to provide alternative transportation, At Bennigan's Tavern and,. Mother State Sen., AN; Dlessnei,, of Afton; a nesota Restaurant and Hotel and,Re-.,, : such as taxi service,: for drunk pa- .Mcker's Food Experience, both in physiclan,• said he applauds the res- 4' sort Associations, said he was not" trons, and to train Its servers to re- al ornington, and T.G.I.Friday's In taurants' effort because national sta-6 ,",aware of the practice. -'.fuse service to,those who have had re- al Park, 19- and 20-year-olds tistics show that drinkers who am 19 too much to drink. ;,-4tr* banned from entering lounges or and 20 are more: likely.- to- get' Into Mewes and John Berglund, execu&OA_4 t:j restaurants in the evenin I , _, • %.�j accidents thaw2l-year-olds.. I �dlrectoroof the Licensed Beverage" He said,-thp,, associations 'also, will Association, said their organizations analyze-� a -OnM-suggest man giment „fi He is a -majoi i 'ns6r this session of are planning to propose programs to policies suet f as how t6: handle happy le restaurateurs say many young H .06 ,.,adults are . not mature enough to -a bill to Ificmaie the - drinking agi to s their members to encourage moder- hours and whither to restrict certain, N moke decisions about drinking and 21. It was defeated In a Senate com-', ate drinking among patrons. age groups, ath t the restaurants want an older mittee last month, but Diessner said 4 ,1c.Untele., he hopes it will be attached, to other'�. "It ma I y. be In . the future that your Representati ves of Bdiinigan's and -waitress,will come up to you and say, Mother Tucker's said they have'had; legislation and pawed. -Hi, int.-lanet,- Which one 0 complaints about ibanning, the say - the. younger -Clients Uyoti,W_'�#iew _jq .,cme drunk to their establishments, very ;happy to hear.'tliaf, (the driving?,tAnd then encourage the':. �youngerV`atrons. Repripentativ0s of 1 'And that they fear prosecution undero,� iestaurants) are facing, the,factsi of driver to-take • advantage of A P" O llc)C.T.G.I. Friday's mfused'td comment., the Dram Shop Act. That law allows life," he said. "After 21,'we"do mike,; that gives drivers free soft drinks all people injured by an intoxicated per - .....sounder. decisions.".__. evening," said Berglund. _,John,,Tonkli ,of. Bloomington's Moll son to sue the person who sold the er Tucker's said that the ban only liquor. -The age limit appears to'.be limited Bennigan's already has programs to applies In the lounge i'and that he I : - "discourage. drunkenness among its 'hasn't had to enforce' strictly re-: i4e,6 to chain restaurants in the Twin Cit I re.,a "'re,, and- have been ;for, i!s, although another chain group,, 'older patrons'throughout Its national cently. 10 I J a 0, 0 C3 IV a. V. ._,V cc go. .0 4 V C3 41 CA.- --Vo la� 1: Cc C6 C, a' - .5 a --I "'U, :,' -� vrs C1 , P. a Lag V FLO C-4 Go= Ugg Cd "18 com". '0 in 0— CIS !Via. ii-A 'Ce; a. C3 V 41) 0 1 1 - - P. -Am 'a = CIS ch! Q,:S 00— -9 �E- V.- LD — COM Cd 0- 20- 9 Cc* cc 009 140, Cd C3 V .4 C C4 41 W cis 0 I-. t E C) C V 06 0 a C2 Z C2 w M CA r J2 C3 07 0 _,UN�Vt Uiia, U) 0 tu.J 0 CIS., C31, a a. was cd :2 e C: 20 cis V: V C3 0 ca -.'a V cc:! 464 s, 9 VO :S 11 a 0, 0 C3 IV a. V. ._,V cc go. .0 4 V C3 41 CA.- --Vo la� 1: Cc C6 C, a' - .5 a --I "'U, :,' -� vrs C1 , P. a Lag V FLO C-4 Go= Ugg Cd "18 com". '0 in 0— CIS !Via. ii-A 'Ce; a. C3 V 41) 0 1 1 - - P. -Am 'a = CIS ch! Q,:S 00— -9 �E- V.- LD — COM Cd 0- 20- 9 Cc* cc 009 140, Cd C3 V .4 C C4 41 W cis 0 I-. t E C) C V 06 0 a C2 Z C2 w M CA r J2 C3 07 0 _,UN�Vt Uiia, U) 0 tu.J 0 Y�; ��YCour. t rules She11"" e� give, data" to EE DC Asbociated (.,,1;;�, ti , t7► EEOGkitbpoenaed company records Tiffany, officers' refused to vidual taxpayers were, violating • ,� �, in its investigation.; r' , "`comply with the IRS summons, Con- some tax law. - ` Washington D.C.. i , �, '.. .'i. . '" tending that the, IRS would have to The- U.S. Supreme Court' made . It But,.th"e''dli company refused -to com- �*et court permission to issue a "John U.S: District Judge " Vincent- Studer- more difficult Monday for employ - ply 'claiming that the EEOd' first y Doe summons" and! could get per - i ick ruled for the'IRS; and the Second eil accused of illegal discrimination should` be forced to specify the mission to do so only after showing U.S. Circuit.Court of Appeals upheld to-delay federal investigations: And . "date, place and circumstances' of there was reason to believe the indi- that'iuling In September. it .,a reed to consider whether to A. theVie ed discriminatory " B g rY Practices. { ,,�; make it more difficult for IRS agents - to .,check on taxpayers involved in In ,tax'case; .the court said if would tai shelters. :w review rulings that allowed IRS. ,. • ' :,;,;:.. .agents to get.,iaformation about tax- In the `first -case, "the ''court ' ru14 ',''•payeJs- from. companies promoting unAnimously that Shell ' Oil Co. may taX ehhh7elters. not withhold records sought by the'�;< Equal Employment Opportunity The controversy began In 1981 when Cammission (EEOC) on grounds that an IRS agent in New York City asliedK,,p the government's accusations are not .: ,Tiffany Fine. Arts,:, Inc., a.. holding • silficiently specific. company for.various subsidiaries en , T `gaged in promoting tax shelters, for RCquiring such specificity , "would:, the names of people licensed to friar-:,, place a potent weapon in the' hands . ` ket�a: product, known+,as the Pedi of employers who have no interest in PuWr, a.medical device. ,, complying" with the '1964. Civil.: : - Rights Act prohibiting discrimination . in "the work place, Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote for the court. a in,,1979,••the commission., accused. { Sh'Nl Oil of discriminating „against ” I blacks and women at the company's' "' Vaod River, Ill., refinery. The, com - *,< mission said Shell unlawfully ekclud ed"blacks and women from manage fiat, professional, technical and oth- er types of jobs at the refinery. The"' inn is.. Star and Tribune` p ®1 Thursday z` x _ April_5/ 1984 3gT. , s . I 1 - a � . htorts ay. g u "" :�.f. �r d'Mayo r -a s �p , O advisory body, which bast. e �� ■ : _ said til x• -_ I wish it wouldn't have ttons for gays and lesbians should be tally favors protections for homosex Mike Hassuba , uals, would have preferred to whit to come up. This fs a very conservative included In the city human wanted Staff Writer town said Huston. 53, who is In his ordinance. "'They said they consider the issue separately. first term as mayor. "(But) if we all more time. satdd� g1e11, take tile: elections'. scheduled for St. Cloud. Minn. run for the woods everytime some• time. With city over a two egg and sausage break •` m1� �m� ,ups we're going to be April 16, the Issue has created west. fast, Mayor Sam Ruston talked al- running a lot. • _L. �4:.: ;. � �ja �Salkaccording t to Chair- the. al paradoxes In the central Mlnneso- most casually Wednesday of what ,! to city. Huston. who owns a Har ley. led him to suddenly come out to '� potentially explosive Issue t0 cloud " rights to St. Cloud just * .Huston, `forced -the issue ratan a election or a series of other ordi- St. Cloud continued on page 5B. ~• favor of gay gl► when he told the city human rights being, planned. He three weeks before election day. commisstoa to study whether protec- nance changes Minneapolis Starand Tribune .-�� F _. Thur. � , April 5, 1984 <: - 5B ,r Sald Davidson motorcycie',dealership Ins "I admire (Huston s) courage,• St. Cloud, and was born In Minneapo- . John Greco, a spokesman for the.,, lls, admits the image of his business Minnesota Department of Human left Rights, the agency that arbitrates, and his stand on gay rights have him open to much good-natured rib the sptste human rights act. "I'm not bing.. e , , ;,; -4 .. so sure about his political (strategy). His mayoXal opponent,' has oth= It indefinitely a hot issue." erwise declined to debate specific issues, generally also supports pro-: But, In St. Cloud, the issue has yet to tections for gays and lesbians: "If stir'much, controversy.. "It just b8sn't there is anyone out there that • is , raised • much' of. an outrage," said ''being abused or mistreated; It is our ' Paul- Stacke, "a- reporter for WJON k duty ' to come to their aid.. said:. Radio. , George', Courrler, 52,'• a reraa l estate" flrst'to'publtcly ak Stawthe cinvestor. Hustonc and other local candidates E` Should'•pto�ectidM foc gays and les-` ,n during his radio talk show where bians be adopted by the city'council,', they stood on the Issue. Sncilm a St:. Cloud , would become. only the- former St Cloud ,city councilman, second city, in •Minnesota ' behtn6 said he has since heard little discus- Minneapolis- to insure gay rights 1n'— .. sion of the. topic., , its city ordinances. St. Paul recently repealed such language and officials in Duluth voted against similar pro- tection. + e MARCH 1984 PERMITS PERMIT FEE PLAN CK. SUR. CH. HOUSEKEEPING UNITS New Single Family Dwellings 2 1,079.00 701.35 142.65 Two Family Dwellings None Townhouses None Apartments or Condos None NEW NON - RESIDENTIAL None ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS AND INSTALLATIONS Non Residential 35 3,420.52 2,223.45 248.29 Residential 23 2,424.50 1,478.52 187.07 DEMOLITIONS None MOVES None GARAGES 2 101.00 AUXILLARY BLDGS. None DRAIN TILE 1 104.50 TENNIS COURTS None POOLS 2 FENCES None TOTALS 65 312.50 65.66 203.13 7,442.02 4,672.11 4.75 VAKIR 24.50 614.26 S.A.C. VALUE PENALTY 850.00 285,287.00 493,929.00 197.50 373,428.00 9,500.00 14,000.00 49,000.00 850.00 1,225,144.00 197.50 Is f.. MARCH 1984 PAGE 1 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -1 -84 Sawhorse Inc. T -83 5604 Warden Ave. Construct Addition to and 32- 117 -21 -13 -0005 remodel dwelling 74.50 Plan Check 48.43 Sur. Ch. 4.25 Value 8,500.00 3 -1 -84 Karkela Const. T -84 7400 Metro Blvd. Remodel office space lst Floor 44.50 UARCO Plan Check 28.93 09- 116 -21 -31 -0013 Sur. Ch. 1.75 Value 3,500.00 3 -1 -84 Trucker Sheehy T -85 6600 France Ave. So. Misc. remodel of interior Suite 275 of existing occupancy 30- 028 -24 -41 -0001 68.50 Plan Check 44.53 Sur. Ch. 3.80 Value 7,588.00 3 -2 -84 Ryan Const. T -86 7261 Ohms Lane Finish tenant space 09- 116 -21 -24 -0029 50.50 Plan Check 32.83 Sur. Ch. 2.25 Value 4,484.00 3 -5 -84 Custom Woods T -87 Southdale Center Remodel space for nutrition Nutrition World world 215.50 29- 028 -24 -32 -0007 Plan Check 140.08 Sur. Ch. 17.50 Value 35.00n.nn 3 -30 -84 Opus Corp. T -88 7600 France Ave. So Remodel of existing office 31- 028 -24 -44 -0010 space as per plans 269.50 Plan Check 175.18 Sur. Ch. 23.50 Value 47,000.00 3 -5 -84 Sawhorse T -89 5107 Wooddale Ave. Construct addition to 18- 028 -24 -42 -0085 existing dwelling 179.50 Plan Check 116.68 Sur. Ch. 13.50 Value 27,000.00 3 -6 -84 Andersons Commercial 6750 France Ave. #216 Remodel office space Management T -90 30- 028 -24 -41 -0001 74.50 Plan Check 48.43 Sur. Ch. 4.06 Penalty 74.50 Value 8,102.00 3 -5 -84 Peak Const. Co. T -91 6113 Arctic Way 31- 117 -21 -43 -0048 Rebuild fire damaged dwelling 150.00 Sur. Ch. 15.00 Value 30,000.00 3 -6 -84 Dayton's T -92 Southdale - Daytons 2nd floor Remodel space 50.50 29- 028 -24 -32 -0006 Plan Check 32.83 Sur. Ch. 2.50 Penalty 50.50 Value 5,000.00 MARCH 1984 PAGE 2 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -6 -84 Andron Inc. T -93 3 -6 -84 D. March T -94 3 -7 -84 Ryan Const. T -95 3 -7 -84 Belt Line Const. T -96 3 -7 -84 Oakwood Builders T -97 3 -7 -84 Oakwood Builders T -98 3 -7 -84 Peter Dukinfield T -99 5808 Garden Ave. 32- 117 -21 -41 -0090 6145 Oaklawn Ave. 19- 028 -24 -43 -0096 7505 Metro Blvd. #380 09- 116 -21 -31 -0018 6521 Gleason Road 06- 116 -21 -14 -0047 6600 France Ave. #245 30- 028 -24 -41 -0001 6800 France Ave. So. Suite 600 30- 028 -24 -41 -0001 3213 West 42nd Street 07- 028 -24 -42 -0003 3 -8 -84 Patio Village T -100 6204 Balder Lane 06- 116 -21 -14 -0027 3 -8 -84 Novus Property T -101 6650 Vernon Ave. So. 31- 117 -21 -34 -0021 3 -9 -84 Stahl Const. Co. 7667 Cahill Road T -102 Construct single family dwelling 421.00 Plan Check 273.65 Sur. Ch. 47.83 SAC (1) 425.00 Value 95,652.00 Remodel basement of existing dwelling 44.50 Plan Check 28.93 Sur. Ch. 1.75 Value 3,500.00 Remodel office space 158.50 Plan Check 103.03 Sur. Ch. 11.11 Value 22,203.00 Remodel existing dwelling 62.50 Plan Check 40.63 Sur. Ch. 3.25 Value 6,500.00 Remodel office space 38.50 Plan Check 25.03 Sur. Ch. 1.13 Value 2,250.00 Remodel office space 50.50 Plan Check 32.83 Sur. Ch. 2.45 Value 4,895.00 Remodel existing kitchen 44.50 Plan Check 28.93 Sur. Ch. 2.00 Value 4,000.00 Construct porch & deck to existing dwelling 104.50 Plan Check 67.93 Sur. Ch. 6.75 Value 13,500.00 Construct wall in existing office 10.00 Plan Check 6.50 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 200.00 Construct office space 352.00 Plan Check 228.80 Sur. Ch. 36.34 Value 72,680.00 MARCH 1984 PAGE 3 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -9 -84 Michael Const. T -103 7449 Cahill Road Remodel office space 08- 116 -21 -41 -0014 152.52 Plan Check 99.13 Sur. Ch. 11.00 Value 22,000.00 3 -9 -84 United Properties 7101 Metro Blvd. Remodel of existing office T -104 09- 116 -21 -21 -0014 space as per plans 56.50 Plan Check 36.73 Sur. Ch. 3.00 Penalty 56.50 Value 6,000.00 3 -12 -84 Irving Levine T -105 7000 Antrim Road Remodel existing dwelling 08- 116 -21 -22 -0005 25.00 Plan Check 16.25 Sur. Ch. .75 Value 1,500.00 3 -12 -84 Daytons T -106 Southdale Center Remodel retail space Daytons 2nd floor Cosmetics 80.50 29- 028 -24 -32 -0006 Plan Check 52.33 Sur. Ch. 5.00 Value 10,000.00 3 -12 -84 Novus Property T -107 6650 Vernon Ave. Remodel swimming pool 31- 117 -21 -34 -0021 238.00 Plan Check 154.70 Sur. Ch. 20.00 Value 40,000.00 3 -12 -84 waters, Cluts & Obrien Inc. T -108 5021 Scriver Road Construct single family 30- 117 -21 -41 -0023 dwelling 658.00 Plan Check 427.70 Sur. Ch. 94.82 SAC (1) 425.00 Value 189,635.00 3 -13 -84 E. P. Gunderson Inc. 6650 & 6710 Vernon Ave. So. Install drain tile T -109 31- 117 -21 -34 -0021 104.50 Sur. Ch. 7.00 Value 14,000.00 3 -13 -84 Robert Obermeyer 5033 Benton Ave. Remodel of existing T -110 33- 117 -21 -31 -0033 screen porch to family room & add garage stall 62.50 Plan Check 40.63 Sur. Ch. 3.50 Value 17,000.00 3 -14 -84 Re- Liable Fire 7104 Amundson Ave. Install ansul R101 -20 -4 T -111 dry chemical fire system 14.50 Plan Check 9.43 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 750.00 3 -14 -84 Young & co. T -112 7001 York Ave. So. Alarm Svstems remodeling 32- 028 -24 -21 -0001 13.00 Plan Check 8.45 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 603.00 MARCH 1984 PAGE 4 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -14 -84 Dayton's T -113 Southdale - Dayton's Construct yogurt bar 29- 028 -24 -32 -0006 229.00 Plan Check 148.85 Sur. Ch. 19.00 Value 38,000.00 3 -14 -84 David W. Stassen 4406 Sunnyside Road Remodel existing dwelling T -114 18- 028 -24 -21 -0024 206.50 Plan Check 134.23 Sur. Ch. 16.50 Value 33,000.00 3 -15 -84 Belt Line Const. 5325 West 74th Street Remodel of existing corridor T -115 as per plans 80.50 Plan Check 52.33 Sur. Ch. 5.00 Value 10,000.00 3 -15 -84 Harlan & Erna Larson 5805 Beard Ave. So. Construct basement bath T -116 20- 028 -24 -31 -0092 17.50 Plan Check 11.38 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 1,000.00 3 -15 -84 Karkela Const. T -117 7400 Metro Blvd. Remodel office space 09- 116 -21 -31 -0013 38.50 Plan Check 25.03, Sur. Ch. 1.50 Value 3,000.00 3 -15 -84 Zastrow - Nasset T -118 5221 Evenswood Lane Finish basement as per 30- 117 -21 -44 -0010 plans 140.50 Plan Check 91.33 Sur. Ch. 10.00 Value 20,000.00 3 -15 -84 Helen Riley & T -119 5832 York Ave. So. Construct double garage Roberta Cole 20- 028 -24 -31 -0031 62.50 Plan Check 40.63 Sur. Ch. 3.50 Value 7,000.00 3 -16 -84 Rick & Sue Windham 6233 Belmore Lane Construct addition to T -120 30- 117 -21 -11 -0079 existing dwelling 50.50 Plan Check 32.83 Sur. Ch. 2.50 Value 5,000.00 3 -16 -84 Erdmann Co. Inc. 6000 Bonnie Brae Remodel basement of existing_ T -121 08- 116 -21 -32 -0059 dwellinq 134.50 Plan Check 87.43 Sur. Ch. 9.07 Value 18,130.00 3 -16 -84 Adaptable Housing Inc. 5700 Abbott Ave. Construct addition to existing T -122 20- 028 -24 -24 -0080 dwelling 140.50 Plan Check 91.33 Sur. Ch. 9.85 Value 19,698.00 MARCH 1984 PAGE 5 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALVE 3 -19 -84 Oakwood Builders Inc. 6545 France Ave. So. Remodel of existina office T -123 Suite 235 space 14.50 29- 028 -24 -23 -0006 Plan Check 9.43 Sur. Ch. .50 ' Value 800.00 3 -19 -84 New Life Bldrs. T -124 5007 Arden Ave. Construct addition to 18- 028 -24 -42 -0057 existing dwelling 233.50 Plan Check 151.78 Sur. Ch. 19.50 Value 39,000.00 3 -19 -84 Mikkelson Wulff T -125 4625 West 77th Street Remodel women's restroom 31- 028 -24 -34 -0002 80.50 Plan Check 52.33 Sur. Ch. 4.90 Value 91800.00 3 -20 -84 Stahl Const. Co. 7667 Cahill Road Remodel office space T -126 193.00 Plan Check 125.45 Sur. Ch. 15.00 Value 30,000.00 3 -20 -84 Bruce Companies T -127 #9 Merilane Construct pool addition 29- 117 -21 -13 -0009 to existing dwelling 443.00 Plan Check 25817.8955 Value Ch 103,700.'00 3 -21 -84 Michael H. Thyren 6605 Iroquois Trail Construct garage addition T -128 06- 116 -21 -31 -0023 to existing dwelling 68.50 Plan Check 44.53 Sur. Ch. 4.00 Value 8,000.00 3 -21 -84 Welsh Const. T -129 5249 West 73rd Street Remodel office warehouse 251.50 Plan Check 163.48 Sur. Ch. 21.38 Value 42,750.00 3 -21 -84 Donaldsons T -130 Southdale - Donaldson's Construct wall in restaurant 29- 028 -24 -32 -0001 25.00 Plan Check 16.25 Sur. Ch. .75 Value 1,500.00 3 -22 -84 Honeywell Prot. T -131 3420- 34 -50 -56 Heritaae Dr. Monitor fire alarm system Serv. 29- 028 -24 -21 -0010 16.00 Plan Check 10.40 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 900.00 3 -22 -84 Honeywell Prot. T -132 5125 Edina Industrial Blvd. Monitor sprinkler system Serv. 10.00 Plan Check 6.50 Sur. Ch. .50 Value 300.00 MARCH 1984 Oakwood Bldrs. T -138 PAGE 6 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -22 -84 Edward W. Getsch 86 Woodland. Circle Remodel existing dwelling Plan Check 28.93 T -133 19- 028 -24 -14 -0032 50.50 Sur. Ch. 1.95 Plan Check 32.83 Value 3,892.00 3 -27 -84 Keith Bennewitz Sur. Ch. 2.50 3433 Hazelton Rd. Remodel existing restaurant Value 5,000.00 3 -23 -84 Mike Farhas T -134 6901 Wooddale Ave. Install basement bedroom Plan Check 36.73 30- 028 -24 -34 -0017 egress window 10.00 Sur. Ch. 3.00 Plan Check 6.50 Value 6,000.00 3 -27 -84 Sawhorse Inc. Sur. Ch. .50 7005 Comanche Court Construct porch addition Value 300.00 3 -23 -84 Balco Bldg. T -135 3425 West 66th Street - Remodel store 193.00 Systems Plan Check 125.45 Plan Check 48.43 Sur. Ch. 15.00 Sur. Ch. 4.45 Value 30,000.00 3 -23 -84 Oakwood Builders 3 -27 -84 6545 France Ave. So. Remodel office space 4111 Morningside Road Rebuild garage on existing T -136 Suite 540 170.50 07- 028 -24 -44 -0123 foundation 38.50 Plan Check 110.83 Plan Check 25.03 Sur. Ch. 12.17 Sur. Ch. 1.25 Value 24,332.00 3 -26 -84 Don Peterson T -137 7215 Cahill Road Construct 3 offices 7400 Metro Blvd. Remodel office Space 08- 116 -21 -14 -0001 110.50 Suite #341 & 345 38.50 Plan Check 71.83 09- 116 -21 -31 -0013 Plan Check 25.03 Sur. Ch. 7.50 Sur. Ch. 1.25 Value 15,000.00 3 -26 -84 Oakwood Bldrs. T -138 3400 West 66th Street Remodel office space 29- 028 -24 -23 -0012 44.50 Plan Check 28.93 Sur. Ch. 1.95 Value 3,892.00 3 -27 -84 Keith Bennewitz T -139 3433 Hazelton Rd. Remodel existing restaurant (Libistros) 56.50 Plan Check 36.73 Sur. Ch. 3.00 Value 6,000.00 3 -27 -84 Sawhorse Inc. T -140 7005 Comanche Court Construct porch addition 07- 116 -21 -21 -0009 to existing dwelling 74.50 Plan Check 48.43 Sur. Ch. 4.45 Value 8,900.00 3 -27 -84 Gorco Const. T -141 4111 Morningside Road Rebuild garage on existing 07- 028 -24 -44 -0123 foundation 38.50 Plan Check 25.03 Sur. Ch. 1.25 Value 2,500.00 3 -27 -84 H. E. Jorgensen Inc. 7400 Metro Blvd. Remodel office Space T -142 Suite #341 & 345 38.50 09- 116 -21 -31 -0013 Plan Check 25.03 Sur. Ch. 1.25 Value 2,500.00 MARCH 1984 PAGE 7 DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT # ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE 3 -28 -84 Lantto Bldg. T -143 5201 Eden Circle 28- 117 -21 -34 -0021 3 -29 -84 Kiecker- Pritchard 6504 Cherokee Trail T -144 06- 116 -21 -13 -0014 3 -29 -84 Pools Inc. T -145 #9 Merilane 29- 117 -21 -13 -0009 3 -30 -84 Statewide Bldrs. 4515 Andover T -146 31- 028 -24 -21 -0023 3 -30 -84 Jack F. Zwirtz T -147 5107 West 50th Street Add offices in warehouse and demising walls in warehouse 152.50 Plan Check 99.13 Sur. Ch. 11.00 Value 22,000.00 Construct Garage addition to existing dwelling 44.50 Plan Check 28.93 Sur. Ch. 2.00 Value 4,000.00 Construct swimming pool 74.50 Plan Check 48.43 Sur. Ch. 4.50 Value 9,000.00 Construct garage addition to existing dwelling 62.50 Plan Check 40.63 Sur. Ch. 3.10 Value 6,200.00 Remodel existing beauty shop 16.00 Plan Check 10.40 Sur. Ch. .50 Penalty 16.00 Value 900.00 t w JIg34 ,r *ey OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 PAGE 1 r►rrrf _ - - -. - CHECK' ':1. DATE AMOUNT V -NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSASE 11073 04/23134 14.10- LOUIS ABRAHAM CORRECTION 30 -42CB- 787 -78 MANUAL AMERICAN !INEN 11+0730 - i_4!23/94 14.10 - L0UI3__ABRA4AM MILEAGE 31- 4208- .787 -78- MAVUAL � 5/.02/8.4 .oe • t w r►rrrf _ - - -. - err -CKS 1239 -4 55/02/94 57.87 AMERICAN !INEN _____ __ ________ LAUNDRY __ 10 -4262- 440 -44 � 5/.02/8.4 1.49 AMERICAN LINEN_ _ -, _ LAU NOR I' 10- 4252 - 482 -48 1287'04 5/02194 74.24 AMERICAN LINED! LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 520 -52 41 128004 '75/02/94 8.78 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 20- 4262 - 628 -62 1 128004 65/72/x4 67.1? AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 128004 GS/C2184 49.71 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 q/yI" 128004 05/02/34 85.78 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86 1 345.35 • •f faar • +• -CKS 1 12806 04/26/44 80.42 89.42 AQUA ENGINEERING • PLANTINGS & TREES 50- 4560- 841 -84 1 1280 ?1 05/01/84 22.00 APEX PEST CONTROL GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -7C 22.7' + 1 123008 04/27/94 13.76 KAMAN 9EARTNC & SPLY REPATP PARTS 1C- 4540 - 560 -56 128078 04/27/84 61.99 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1 -- -77_$0 �R U- 4125/44 _ - _12.95 KAMAN _BEARING. & SPLY REPAIR PARTS - _..__ - _ - - -__ 10 -4540- 560 -56 _ 1281) ^.8 U4/27/g4 3.52 KAMAN REAR INC & SPLY REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128008 04/27/84 13.:,0 KAMAN 6EAR'NG & SPLY R. PATP. PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1 105.12 • _ _ s •••-CKS 1 -- - - -- 123712 C5/+?2/34 97.95 AUT040BIL_ SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 97.95 r 1 12.8013 2 4/23/84 25.68 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 128013 55/02!34 15.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 1 _ .118013 04/23/94 62.68_- _ __-pLTERNAT03._REBUILD -_ REPAIR_ PARTS_ 10 -4540- 560 -56 j 128013 :4/26/?4 2.13 ALTERNATOR R =BUILD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 128713 05/02/84 20.1) 0 ALTERNATOR REBUILD PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 1 129013 04/23/84 55.68 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 2C -45C4- 646 -64 182.07 -- 12f3D1.4_ _ 05/72/84__ -_ - - _ _ . _ _ _ 3.98 _ -__ .AUTO PARTS__PRO PARTS__ 3.1)8 • - - - � 1 •rr►rr .r. -CKS I 128'920 04/23/84 53.22 r AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PARTS - - 10- 4620- 560 -56 1 123027. 04/23fR4 _ _ - 47.54 . - - -_- AIR.HYDRAULI.0 SYSTEM__._ _._PAP.TS 10- 4620- 560 -56 10 ^.76 + fftr. a - - - -.- _ - - -- fff -CKS : "� '128026 U4/23/94 245.49 BADGER METER INC REPAIR, PARTS 37- 4540 - 783 -78 1 1984 CITY OF EDINA PAGE 2 I CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 CHECK N7. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIO-N_- _ - -- - -- - ACCOUNT -NO* INV. -0 P.O. # - -- MESSAGE----- - 245.49 r. , l rll CKS - n 128031 128031 04/27/84 05/02/84 2.52 16.74 BERTELSON BROS INC BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 200 -20 10 -4504- 422 -42 I L' 128031 65/02194 6.37 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 ' - - - 12801 _- _ ^5/02/84 - 6U.5T._ _- __REpT?LSON._9ROS INC _ -_ _GEM SUKPPLIES10- 4504 - 510 -51 128031 04/30/44 4.,QO- B -'RT =LSON BROS INC CP,_DIT - - - - - 10 -45G4- 510 -51 - - - -- "I 12 BU 31 04/26/-44 10.40 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 128031 04/23/84 14.08 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 128031 04/23184 35.80 BERT 'ELGnN BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 128731 04/23/84 14.00 B- RT_LSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPIES 1G- 4516 - 510 -51 04/23/84 - _.44 --EERTELSON_BROS INC _ OFFICE- SUPPLIES 4516 - 510 -51 128031 04/26/84 16.68 BERTELSON BROS INC ____10- PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 128031 04/23/84 15.17 BERTELSON BROS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 616 -61 187.97 • ..t tf ftfR -�' rrt -CKS I "I 128033 U4/23/84 58.95 BERG- ORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 128033 ,05/02/84 158.85 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 128033 34/23184 54.00 BERGFORC TRUCKING INVENTORY_ 50 -4626- 822 -82 128033 04/23/84 190.80 BERG=ORD TRUCKING _ _ INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 128033 04/23/84 8x.65 SERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 ?� - _128,033 05/02/84- 310.50 ______BERG --ORD TRUCKING ___ INVENTORY __ 50- 4626 - 842 -84 °I 128033 US /OZ /84 210.60 BERG =080 TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 ' 128J33 04/2 3/8 4 156.15 BERGFORO TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 128033 04/23/84 111.60 BERG-ORD TRUCKING* -- - INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 - ., 1x340.10 �- - - -- --- - - -- -- _ - - -- - - - - �� jJ- �- -_'-- •fiat• -- -' - - - -- - --- ---- --- - - ---- --- ----- --_ .-- _-. -- --- -- -- _--- fti -CKS ... -_-- ---- - -',..I 128041 J5/01/84 142.50 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 142.50 • _ irf -CKS 128044 64/23/84 7.46 - -- - BILL BOYER FORD PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 128744 04/23/84 75.34 BILL BOYER FORD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 "I - - 82.80 + __. _._ ___.- _.. -_._ _____ -- - .__.- - -____ _ _ _ -__. -_ -. _ __- �I,'I ♦trill .'I ••• -CKS 128346 05/02/84 37.Q0 8LU1ABERG PHOTC NUSIC SUPLYS 27 -4596- 627 -62 ^'I 37.90 128J41' 05/02/84 3.15 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 . 1,71 s, 128048 ')4/23/84 17.44 BRISSM'AN KENNEDY INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 ''; 12804-4 04/30/84 166.60 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 ', °.I - - - -- 184.04 -• - -- !_I 128049 Ci5/01/84 25061 BURESH ROBERT MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 440 -44 , Z 1 - v L' -'I 11984 C'TY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 PAGE 3 CHECK N1. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT. N0. # P.O. t MESSAGE _INV.- = 128049 05/01/44 96.00 BURESH ROBERT MEETING EXPENSES 10 -4206- 440 -44 i 2 ----- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- ----- - - - - -- -11.1 .61. -` - - -- 5 ♦«rif* «r+ -CKS .� 128054 U4/23/84 141.30 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 I � ,I 141.30 10 „ I” c «. « «.. - - - - -- - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- - - -- -- ----- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - -- — - - = - -- .rr -CKS 14! !' - - - - - r. 128059 04/23/84 173.30 BARCO BEARING REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 -- - - - - -_ — 235.32 ,3 128C69 04127/84 287.C4 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 ='I " 128067 04/23/84 101.77 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSINS 28- 4624- 704 -70 388 .81 * *r -CKS =1 z�l - - - - - - -- - - -- - -- -- —GEN - I 128065 04/23/84 93.00 CULLIGAN SUPPLIES 50- 4504 - 821 -82 - -- -- - - -- -- . -- �I- 93.00 + '- ,I I * ** -CKS -1 128070 04/23/84 —__ 24._3 0 CAR LSON _THERMO GEN_ SUPPLIES 4504 - 783 -78 128070 04/23/94 84.53 __— CARLSON THERMO GCN SUPPLIES _30- 30- 4504- 783 -78 I'_ 108.83 I -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - + *r CKS — - - - -- 12$ 0_72_74123/94 55.44 CHAP IN PUPLISHING-_CO ADVERTISING _ 10- 4210- 140 -14 'I 55044 r -- r «rr +« *** -CKS "I 128075 05/02134 9.55 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 _.1280- 75.__._— __C5/U2/_?4 - ______- 4._50_- CLANCY ORUG _INCGEN_SUPPLjES _10 -4504- 421 -42__ 128015 05/02/84 4.15 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 200 -2C 3 ?I 128075 05/02/84 11.70 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 260 -26 j 1_128075 05/02/84 3.70 CLANCY DRUG INC _ PHOTO_ SUPPLIES 1U -4508- 510 -51 33.60 + -- s. • Isr 128077 05/ ^2/94 60.00 CMI REFRIGERATION EQUIP MAINT 50- 4274- 841 -84 ,.. -- - -- - - 60.00 �_al *r +rrr *r* -CKS 128019 04/23/84 96.30 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 96.30 + j;` 128080 U4/27/94 50.40 CONT -MINN CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 I L 128080 04/27/84 50.40 CONT -MINN CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 y f | —' '--------- 1984 czTr OF cozmx ~ cxccn NO.- DATE _ _ _ xmuum? J � 128080 0*v27x84 50 .40- vzaour d5v02,8* 128092 04/23f84 jilt cxccx ncszu7ca 05~07~84 nvn% 4 | _ xE._N»VR -- '-__-ITEM- nqV0r Noe-zNV~-#' P-0- .0 MESS0GE__-_' cnm7~nzmw cnmnccrznm 27~*624~664~66 � .° � °°°~cwo |, - - 19. 75 -- - comwxr-p��c � oxperr-----comr- -----�n��o�O-�«o+s4----------� ---------��" 331.38 CONWAY rmc u oArcrr nxnro 10~*620~560~56 2�.��-__-__��VU��J �-&-�AFETY -__�q� 373.38 ° - --------' '--'-------'�? 1 8 -__-_y5/02 128099 05/02x84 mnnvv 04/27/94 �-1 128090 04/23/84 ^ ' ' - g5/0e/F4___ 128090 04/23/P4 ~ vz ] u,om os/oa/n* 128108 05/02/84 ono o ------------'--' 1280 9.1 04f27/84 398^00 o oxcc s 128091 04/27/84 1op.no_CzTr_OF_EDzwx oznT 2 128091 04/27/84 _i 239~5* CITY OF cnIwx _wx7cx wArcm ` -------- -'--�` 128U91 - 04/27/84 - -- - w«rca 20~*258~646~64 J �7O�1�l�g� | ; |^^ czrr or co[mx vzauvr ouxo` w4 �] *nr,po 1 8 -__-_y5/02 128099 05/02x84 mnnvv 04/27/94 128114 94/23184 128114 04/23/84 (4 CKs__.�|�' "`� 437"90 ccnv pnucm 7nxIm au1o» ----' - ��' u4 a7vo4 - ^ ' ' - g5/0e/F4___ - molou 0 5/02/84 ~ vz ] u,om os/oa/n* 128108 05/02/84 128114 94/23184 128114 04/23/84 (4 CKs__.�|�' "`� 437"90 ccnv pnucm 7nxIm nspxIn pxmrs 10-4540-560-56 10-4540-560-56 1r9,�� _��B[��4w��_J��- s�__ !=. 615.29 ° compxmr o ono o ------------'--' - IcJ 398^00 o oxcc s GES 20-4504-646-64 1op.no_CzTr_OF_EDzwx oznT 2 20~4562~*42~** { vo_*ano~noo~e `� 239~5* CITY OF cnIwx _wx7cx wArcm 1o~4258-54O-54__________ -------- -'--�` o*.58 czrr or cmImx w«rca 20~*258~646~64 50 �� | czrr or co[mx um7cn ---- ---------------''----'�WAI 4nnms1.90 ~ oe1-82 �] *nr,po .. ' °°°~cwm "J 4"75��nJm�-�w«Yws-____A--cTJm 10~f2�-m�y0__ 75.26 Coumrmcv c wxvwc MzLs«sc---- -------1u-*znu~voo~xo - --- ------- --� ��'� 90.91 _28.0o__ a°4o 40 .72 z°on ° CUomn«N o CoaomAw nnrno cn cosxm«m mornn co cLzm«x INC ___---84.00 - � °°°-Cms�- REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 �42 210.00 o REPAIR PARTS 27:4540:662-66 compxmr o ono o oznT 1 --------------------| - IcJ 398^00 o oxcc s GES 20-4504-646-64 nuo o oznT 2 20~4562~*42~** { {^^ ___---84.00 - -___--_ 210.00 o oxcc n neccm c compxmr o ono o oznT 1 --------------------| - IcJ 398^00 o oxcc s snccm C Cnnpwvv n nuo o oznT 2 20~4562~*42~** { {^^ -- 16°00 - D DALE G GREEN u u92� � �� 7 708 00 , 31,30 DELEGARD TOOL CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4'504-301-3G 1704 66.21 DELEGARD TOOL CO PARTS 10-4620-560-56 !711 L'.. 51984 CfTY CF EOIAA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 PAGE E k CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT_ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. a P.O. - _ __ ___— __- _ - - a - - M ES SA 11 5 - • +* -CKS �- �`' I - _ ----- _E..F+RLCt_8A_KIAGL CO. .___CGNCESSLONS _ 28- 4624 - 704 -70 l16.56 r -- - - -- - - - -- �q _ �7, °I rrrrrr * ** -CKS 7: �;`I 128146 04/26184 154.33 GREEN ACRES SPKL CONT SERV 20 -4200- 642 -64 �;; �s y u z z - 12.81.2.0_ _______05 /01/94 _ _ _12. 726.. 55___- �_rRSEY_yLNDHCRST-___ - LEGAL_ SERYTCES 10 2010- 000- 00___ 123120 05/01/84 11.727.68 DORSEY WINDHORST LEGAL SERVICES -__ 10- 2010 - 000 -OD s 128120 05/01/84 640.00 CCRSEY WINDHORST CONSTRUCTION, 60 -1300- 173 -03 a 1281_20_ _ 05/01134 240.00DORSET- YI_NDHORST CONSTRUCTION - -— -- -� 25.334.33 r - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - frr * *f orr -CKS �izl -- 128124 05/02/84 325.86 DALEN J.N. SAN ANTONIO EXP 16- 4202 - 160 -16 I" _ '^' 128125 04/26/84 230940 RERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 =I, —_ 1281-25- __— _J4_/26/84 _ -_ —_— _706.50 _ -MERIT_- SUP?_LT _PARTS_ -_ - -_— 128125 05/01/14 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 _ 128125 04126/84 684.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 642 -64 _- 128125 04/26194 179.55 MERIT SUFPLT GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -E4 = 128125 04/27/84 2.154.30 MERIT SUPPLY WEED SPRAT 20- 4566 - 642 -64 128125 05/02/84 374.40 MERIT SUPPLY WEED SPRAY 20- 4566- 642 -64 r lV1__12d1�5___- 1_•109.RO MERIT_S_UPPLY. - 644_ -64 27I• 128125 _05/72/84 04/23/94 -__ 102.00 - - __- MERIT SUPPLY _TRASH_CANS _— _ CLEANING SUPPLIES —_20- _4_6_02 28- 4512 - 708 -70 _ _- 6.186.90 + -' 128126 05/02/84 1>?3.75 CAVIS EUGENE WEED PREPARATTON 60- 4100 - 985 -90 128126 05/02/84 14.26 CAVIS EUGENE MILEAGE 60- 4208 - 985 -90 ' 198.�J1 - ffrrrf * ** -CKS 71 128131 05/01/84 24.00 ASFlUNO COFFEE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 704 -70 I 128131 04/23/8 4 29.50 ASPLUND COFFEE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624- 704 -70 ` 3..! 53._50 - - - - -- - -- _ �.., - - -- — - - - -- - -` -- *** -CKS a 128136 04/23/A4 85.70 EARL F ANDERSEN GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 128136 04/23/94 95.90 EARL F ANDERSEN SIGN 8 POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 -_]231 ib 7 -- G4/27/84 - - - 392.40__. -- 392.40 £¢R- F gNDERSEN_ - -- -- - -- STGN'�:.. 8 POSTS -- - - -- 1- 10- 4542 - 358 -30 1281.6 04/23/34 42.90 EARL F ANDERSEN -S -- -- -- GEN SUPPLIES -4 - - - -- - - - - -- 20- 4504 - 646 -64 - - -- -Is,1. <, r' I 'I r *rrra - - -- — - - - - -- - - - - -- _- 1.281.39 04/27/84 - - - -_- 122.00 EDINA ELECTR_I -C _CO_ -_ EQUIP MAINT 27- 4274- 661 -66 ;co, I` 128139 U4/23/84 91.22 EDINA ELECTRIC CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 708 -70 ") 213.22 * 621 - • +* -CKS �- �`' I - _ ----- _E..F+RLCt_8A_KIAGL CO. .___CGNCESSLONS _ 28- 4624 - 704 -70 l16.56 r -- - - -- - - - -- �q _ �7, °I rrrrrr * ** -CKS 7: �;`I 128146 04/26184 154.33 GREEN ACRES SPKL CONT SERV 20 -4200- 642 -64 �;; �s y u 1984 czr, OF Tnzmx r*ccK ncnzsrcn os-ur~o* p^sc a CHECK N1. oArc 4nnVm, *EmooR ITEM DESCRIPTION ��c�u�?-m�.-�m��-��o._�_m��@�--__- . _ 128148 04/23/84 60.00 ELVIN SAF_7TY SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-449-44 128148 U4/23/84 6U.90 ELVIN SAF�'TY 128148 04/23/84 49.00 ELVIN SAF_rTY SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-449-44_________ 128149 94/?3/84 49.00 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-449-44 14 to 128154 5 /02/94 664.12 JOE ELIAS WAGES 27-4100-663-66 ZI ` 128161 05/02/84 249.14 FLYING CLOJO SANTAR RUBBISH REMOVAL 10-4250-353-30 - PARTS 128162 04/26/94 12.98 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PAWTS ' ` 1?8167 05/01/34 39485.00 FIRST NATIONAL BANK INTEREST BONDS 27-4300-660-6U � |^� | 3 ,4»»~»u !°| ^' - 128176 05/021%14 1,276.00 G.L.CONTRACTING INC CONSTRUCTION 20-1421-000-00 r' -| - ^,^``~~~ ^ - 128191 nwanxo* 210.co mcmsRxL o"onrn umzronm xLLoucmcE 10~4266~*21-42 x,'Q4/23y844oV~C-0 GENERAL 'SIunTs UNIFORM 421c4a__� �j 128181 04/23/R4 11 090 ocwcnxc spoxro pxnro 27~4620~662~66 -' ----- -- ' ------�-�'| ~� ._/ 6*1~90 V�_ -us�»��n�--_-_---'___-�.��.- C�B�� 0.�� . r°zp ° _ _ _+° .` °° - ---'--'----� - - - ------- '--'--- '� ---�-------------' °°°~cKS i_'� -- _ __ __�_'__'_' �zm,n s �v r�� o a* � u° y rr sonozx CO ncp^/n pxnrs oo~*n*o~rmo~pa 74 , � '' ` - �� -. �»m* c/,v OF cozwx -CHECK NO. DATE [- ' ^ _ xMoumr _ycuooR. cwccw ncozoTcn - -_ _-ITEm�p��c��I��y-__ os~nr~u* p»sc 7 AcCOUhTL-Nue_1mx,_w'p.-O°_* pEgSAos' w 128206 04/23/84 105.00 G 9 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40-4262-801-80 %W 136.77 12 128209 U4/23/84 10.00- GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 40 128209 U4/23/84 14.04 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 --I -04/26/84 128138 C5/02/84 39.81 GRAYRAR ELECTRIC C'J REPAIR PARTS' 10-4540-540-54 2,1�2 0 9 28.45 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 -7 128209 04/23f84 42.51 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4540-560-56 1282',19 L5/U2/84 80499 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 C Ks 12 19? 05/02/84 1,905.00 ---WALTr-R-C GUSTAFSON SERVICES 10-4100-220-22 LA—---�Q 41 61 WELD NG SUPPLIES 10-4610-560-56 %0 7 128104 (14/3'1/84 31 .98 GENERAL COMMUNICAT-NIS RADIO SERV 10-4294-560-56 128194 U4 f 3.1194 93.50 GENEIAL COMMUNICATNS GEN SUPPLIES 1G-4504-420-42 qw � 1?8199 0 5 /02184 154 .72 _QUICK SERVICE BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 1 128206 owznm* V4v2-3 533.94 -_- o.4-.75-___-___n--$_n_acmVTCcS----__- s u x usaxIcco Lxowonr LAUNDRY— 10~4262~301~30 D-*a6o~szV~5 2_--_--- C� |^l ,zozoo 04123r94 *^.00 o m n ucxvzccn Lxowory 10~42*2~540~54 ---'- - --- ^'! *w,| 128206 04v23/84 374.21 n m m ocnxrccm Lxowopr 10~*262~*60~56 206_ __ o*/2n/o� � 252.75 � � n aEn*zCco L«umon o~�zaora�-�o u It- 72 w 128206 04/23/84 105.00 G 9 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40-4262-801-80 128209 U4/23/84 10.00- GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 40 128209 U4/23/84 14.04 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 --I -04/26/84 2,1�2 0 9 28.45 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 -7 128209 04/23f84 42.51 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4540-560-56 1282',19 L5/U2/84 80499 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 LA—---�Q 41 61 WELD NG SUPPLIES 10-4610-560-56 [] ---- pv .�| 1984 CITY OF FOINA -CHECK NO. DATE ('I 128214 128214 128214 128214 128214 128214 04/26/84 04/26/34 04/26%84 04/26/84 74/26/84 G4/26/R4 �I i CHECK REGISTER a.af t i 128218 U4/23/84 1.11 i 1 =' •tf• it VENDOR I'I 128220 04/26/84 I' 128220 04/26/84 •' I� is •iaa 128237 04/27/84 "j �. aaf of • 128234 - ti•rar 04/3C/84 - - - -- AMOUNT 29.67 _40.50 _ 74.63 8 .93 8.93 28.93 245.47 98.40 98.40 • 57.40 159.00 216.40 + 6.00 HOFF WILLIAMSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.00 57.95 FFOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 57.05 + -,I -- -- - -- ar• -CKS- :�I 10 -4516- 120 -12 ••• -CKS . I 10- 4262- 421 -42 - - �»� - - - -- • ra -CKS McCoy GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 I. •••►•i I *•• -CKS i CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 PAGE 8 4 VENDOR ITEM_DESCRIPTTON ACCOUtiT_N0. INV. q_P.O.- #_MESSAGE 05/01/84 582.63 FLORENCE _. CONSULTING 10 -4200- 180 -18 - N.R. TOLL COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610- 560 -56 NORBALK _.______ X31" -___ -- H.R. TOLL._ COMPANY_- WELDING_._ SUPPLIES _ 10- 4610_- 560 -56 589.30 a H.R. TOLL COMPANY WELDING 8LPPLTES 1.0- 4610 - 560 -56 `� H.R.-TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 20 -45 ,)4- 646 -64 _ __ _ H.R. TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 114.36 2_90- .22HY HYDRAULIC ORA_ULIC H.R. TOLL _ COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 783 -78 •..- CKS -- :, HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 27 -4618- 662 -66 _ CKS_ 119 MAR NEO LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 '! MAR NED_LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 -.� 6.00 HOFF WILLIAMSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 6.00 57.95 FFOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 57.05 + -,I -- -- - -- ar• -CKS- :�I 10 -4516- 120 -12 ••• -CKS . I 10- 4262- 421 -42 - - �»� - - - -- • ra -CKS McCoy GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 I. •••►•i I *•• -CKS 404.58 I a•ar•t 1287.45 05/02/94 27.00 ROBERT B HILL SALT 10- 4538 - 440 -44 128245 - _209.09 ROBERT 8 HILL_ CONT _REPAIRS __ -28- 4248 - 708 -70 "j 235.09 • 128248 05/02/84 186.08 HARMON GLASS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4%.. z� - - -ar• -CKS _'f.41 'I 71 - -- -- --- i•r-CKS - i 128240 05/01/84 582.63 FLORENCE NORBACK CONSULTING 10 -4200- 180 -18 1- 28240__ - _____05/01/84__ ______._6.67_ _____. FLORE_NCE NORBALK _.______ -. MLILEAGE - - ----------------------------- 10- 4208 - 180 -18 589.30 a 44 `� of • • • • 75. 128243 128243 04/23/84 114.36 2_90- .22HY HYDRAULIC ORA_ULIC SPECILTY SPECILTY___-- R =PAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS __ - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -_ 10- 4540 - 560- 56____ 404.58 I a•ar•t 1287.45 05/02/94 27.00 ROBERT B HILL SALT 10- 4538 - 440 -44 128245 - _209.09 ROBERT 8 HILL_ CONT _REPAIRS __ -28- 4248 - 708 -70 "j 235.09 • 128248 05/02/84 186.08 HARMON GLASS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 4%.. z� - - -ar• -CKS _'f.41 'I 71 - -- -- --- i•r-CKS - °°°~cps p | mmaos 04v23^84 19902.60 JONES -CHEMICALS 'INC ----'WATER 'SUPPLIES 0~4az2~v8s-7m---'----------------1 1 ' ~ 128283 u5v02v9* 446~40 Jnmco cHcwzcxLo INC uxrcx ouppLzcn 30~4*22~785~7u Mv � -- --- - - -- --_-___ '-- L---; 1984 CTTY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 9 --- ------ -- CHECK NO. DATE A-MOUNT VENDCR TTE M DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NOe TNVe Of P*Oe 4 PESSAG�E 128248 04/23/84 112.20 HARMON GLASS PAR TS 10-4620-560-56 128253 C5/02/84 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 128268 05/02184 373.59 ITASCA EQUIP Co REPA!R PARTS 10-4540-560-56 qw. 128268 05/02/84 461.16 ITASCA EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 10-4 540- 560- 56 128278 04/23/34 17.25 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66 `~ 128279 04/23/84 21 .05 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE CABLE TV 10-2149-000-Ob ---- -- 128279 04/23/84 5F.29 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4 5 04-318- 30 282 F9 04/23/84 126.52 JERRYS OUR OWN HO WE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10-4504-325-30 -_ - - 4 1__' ~~-. ~-- ~— .~-^ .-. ~~.'^^^~ ."-°=°-""'-= ~ _ 04/23/84 1,op JEnmvS_ OUR _OWN nOwc_�___�cm SuppLzcS 0~*594~390~30 |^� ..____28279 [] �cuzxo 04x23v84 46.au jEnmvo uon wum wowc scw ooppLzso---'-------1o~*su*_44o~44 ----�--- - -----^ | 128279 o*v23/84 1a.*u ucnnYn cuc oww 000c pcw suppLzco 10~*504~520~52 �4�a3r94zD'^23'--''----oc8RYS_ OUR _OWN -*ouEGsm_�yPP�zc3 g�^su*~��o~�* �'|, |~ vzmz/v u*/zs/o^ 40.68 uEeoYs OUR wwm HD WE s�m suppL 1cs ---------7o-4sn*-s6n-su------ -- - - - -'-- !4-| ' 128279 04/2 3/84 ao"zo ucnmvo OUR wwm xowE cLcxmzmG ouppLxco 10~4512~*40~*4 128219 _ 0*v23/94 _ _ 123,16 ---- JsRnYS_uun -�ucnnvn mww wnus PAINT ` 10~4544~520~52 |'' �znzry o*movo� �s.�n nua nwm xouc---' p«x7s - -----------'1n~*aaO-san~56' ----- - - - - ---- ' 128279 04/23v84 z1u.16 usmmvs OUR mwm *omc scm auppLzco 20~*5 04~64 6~u^ '` 1282119---_-_ »4/2»'0 109 .2 2_--_---+FRnYS-OUR OWN -*oe�* REPAIR LPARTS 0~4 540~6**~64- ^ |^l 123279 04123/14 15.13 Jcnnvo omn owm *owc PAT NT ------------2n-4544-646~64 ------- - ------- ."�( ,zmorn 04/23v84 oa.o* Jcnnvs OUR uww onwc ruoLr 20~4580~6*6-6* `^ _1z8ary u4v23'n* _ *^1* ocnnvn ---ucxnrz OUR nwm xouc Lumocn 20~460*~6*6~6* /^ 12o279 04/23v94 31.39 oun-oun xowc - --'zmxcmrunv mupOLzfs-----zx~�aov~onn~oo -^" | " _-_.vz�z��__-_---��vz�Y� vuaorp 04v23r84 a^rn _--9.45___'-_-uE8nYS-O»R Jcnnvs OUR mww OWN uouc xDw� scw mupp�zc� �CLEANING -SUPPLIES av~�no�-a��~ua 27-4512-661 -66 |^' 12827e 04/23/84 ,*.uu Jsnnvo ooy'owm*n4c---- pAnrs ----�27-*azo-6a2- � -- ----- --------��'| '|, vonzro 04x23xR* 75.93 ucnm,n OUR nwm *noc ocu ouppLzco 23~*504~70 ~ �i-_- 12K oxv �*vzn�o� a~9p--__uER»YS_Oun_pwm ' *nWE______sEN_SUPPLIES 40~450*-80 1~8 0 128'2 79 o4/23/84 u°o9 �cnnru CUR num oowc acm soppczco o-036�oa�~d�-----------'--------- | ' � 128279 0*v23x84 4s.na ucmano OUR owm oow� ocm oupp�zcs 50~4504~8*2~8* °°°~cps p | mmaos 04v23^84 19902.60 JONES -CHEMICALS 'INC ----'WATER 'SUPPLIES 0~4az2~v8s-7m---'----------------1 1 ' ~ 128283 u5v02v9* 446~40 Jnmco cHcwzcxLo INC uxrcx ouppLzcn 30~4*22~785~7u Mv � -- --- - - -- --_-___ - 1984 CrTy OF EDIhA CHECK R EGTSTER C5-07-84 PAGE 13 CHECK NO- DATE AMOUNT - - - -VE N-DOR ------ITEM--DESCR,IPTIDN---ACCO.UNT_ -NO* INV* # P.Oo 0 FIESSAGE 128213 '5/02/14 6930- JONES CHEMICALS INC CREDIT 30-4 622- 78 5- 78 2 342 .70 P 12-929? U4/27184 1Z,069.90 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INS URAUCE --------10-4260-510-51 128292 04/27/84 1 9172.00 HARRIS 40MEYER CO INSURANCE 101. 128304 (:4 12 3/ 84 40.65 KNOX LUM07R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-390-30 SUPPLIES 1283U4 U4/23/94 47.89 KNOX LUMB-R CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-390-30 ------ 128304 04/23/84 31 .74 KNOX LUMBrR CO GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-520-52 128304 04/231%34 97.97 KNOX LUMBER Co GEN SUPIES 28-4504-708-70 117 412.73 128317 05/j2/84 91.�19 LAWSON PRODUCTS 10-4504-325-30 128317 04/23/34 271.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4 5 04 -32 5-3 0 Q4/27/84 212.87 LAWSON PR 33UC TS PARTS 10-4- 6 2-0---560- 56 128317 04/23/84 29904 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10-4620-560-56 12831f 128 317 05/02/94 04/23/84 161.10 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS ----------20-4504--646-64 10-4620-560-56 122.75 LAWSON PRODUCTS GE4 SUPPLIES 128317 128317 04/23/,94 263.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 20-4504-646-64 05/02/84 28,10 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504-801-80 CKS 128319 05/01/84 420.00 LErTNER COMPANY SOD BLACK DIRT 27-4562-662-66 128331 04/23/F4 1 ?2 .22 LAHASS -CORPORATION CONT REPirRS--- -10-4248-560-56 RA T S 281.10 - ^� raj__.�.._.._--- -...._.___.._.. --•-'-- -"'--. -_. .__- - -'-- 1984 CITY OF EOINA ' t � CHECK REGIST_R G5 -07 -84 PAGE 11 b CrrC✓ Nr. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO• INV. a P.0, a MESSAGE _ PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 _ -- 128341 04/26(84 99.60 M & I IND SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 20 -4540- 642 -64 99.60 PARTS 2C -4540- 642 -64 REPAIR PARTS _ 20- 4540- 642 -64 R._PAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 REPAIR 128?42 04/26/94 19.95 MAC AU --EN EQUIP IVC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 670 -66 19.95 + ARTS 27 -4 5.40- 670- 66 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4534- 325 -30 GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 �+ 128344 04/23/84 33.12 M'C OXYGE`! & EQUIP j 33.12 • "' Cv I fff k • 128355 74/23/44 78.55 MINNSOTA BEARING CO t, 128755 64/23/44 32.75 MINNSOTA REARING CO 111.30 + i ty .f •f.# 128759 U4/23/?4 62.46 MINN TORO INC f_! 128359 U4123/?4 22.34 MINN TORO !NC 126359 14/23/84 57.16 MINN TORO INC 128359 04/26/84 18.79 MTaJN TORO INC �! 128351 04/27/84 41.46 MINN TORO INC 1-4/23/84 _. 29.48 MINN TORO INC. 128359 J4/27114 16.76 MINN TORO TNC G 128359 04/7 ^ /24 6.73 MINN TORO INC i 128359 J4/231R4 17.35 MINN TORO TNC I 128350 C4/27/94 95.05 MINN TORO INC 128359 U4/30/84 190.32 MINN TORO INC 128359 04/23/84 _ - _ - 226.26_ NTMN. TOR C_ INC 773.36 t✓ 124360 04/23/94 47.p5 MINNESOTA WANNER 12836U 24/23/84 29.75 MINNESOTA WANNER Gj- 128360 94/2384 69.25 MINNESOTA WANNER _123360 :4/23/84- -, -- 40.00 M'NN- SOTA_WANNER I.._ 186.95 f GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -3C , REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 _ •f•-CKS 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 . REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 PARTS 1U -4520- 560 -56 P,;,PAI'A PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 PARTS 47.20 _• 10 -4620- 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 20 -4540- 642 -64 REPAIR PARTS 2C -4540- 642 -64 REPAIR PARTS _ 20- 4540- 642 -64 R._PAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 670 -66 REPAIR _ PARTS 27- 4540 - 670 -66 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 670 -66 REP A I R--P ARTS 27 -4 5.40- 670- 66 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4534- 325 -30 GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 EQUIP MAINT 27- 4274- 662 -66 REPAIR PARTS- __.30 -4540- 781 -78 ** *-CKS f k f f • • ** *-CKS , 40 128379 Q4 /3Q /R4 47.20 METRO FONE COMM RADIO SERV 1G- 4294- 560 -56 -- - - -- 47.20 _• t �y i 128730 J4/23/84 3,522.70 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10 -4100- 220 -22 * ** -CKS 3,522.70 t I" 128381 04/23/84 26.25 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 4212- 660 -66 * **-CKS e 26.25 • ** *-CKS , ** *-CKS , t t t * ** -CKS t 1 ;e * **-CKS e 128383 04/23/44 154.16 MPLS COMP TREAS WAT_R - - - 30- 4640- 783 -78 v 128383 04/23/84 4,453.72 MPLS COMP TRSAS WATER 30- 4640 - 783 -78 e - 1984 CITY O OF EDINA C CHECK REGISTER 0 05-0.7-84 PAGE 12 -- - ---- 128385 0 05/02/94 3 360.00 m mCGUIRE ROBERT T TREE INSPECTIONS - -4 2 42- 35 3- 30 128385 0 05/02/84 540.00 M MCGUIRE ROBERT T N SO 6G'006-010-18----- 128388 0 04/23/84 4 4.89 - NTL ATOMTK MOTOR R -PAIR PARTS 1 10-4540-560-56 129400 0 04/27/84 1 1 9340.43 N NORT4WE!ST'--R4 TIRE CO T TIRES & TUBESS 1 10-4616-560-56 1 9340.43 CKS 128412 0 0 5 10219 4 8 88.11 N NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY I INVENTOR Y 2 23-1209-000-00 --�-------��4504.-661~66------ - 13 0 04/27/84 4 41.68 m mxTzowuzoc Pxpcno o ocm obppLzcm - - -- --- ` ` "71 41.68 ' a cxs � c ` 1 128*34 - � �05m02v8* - - _ -z»~'o P PRINTERS SERVICE INC E EQUIP -^�l�� « «��70-- � �= 128439 05/02/94 214.38 pnrnm Lxnc xs 128440 04f23/34 10.00 PAULFRIANZ THEODORE 128441 U5/02/84 186.80 THE PRINT SHOP 128446 04123/84 118928 PICNrER RIM & WHEEL 128446 04/23/84 31 .25 PICNEER RIM & WHEEL 128446 04/26/84 96.50 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL 128452 04/23/94 69.60 QUICK SERV BATTERY 128452 04/23/84 146.22 QUICK SERV BATTERY � � aEm auppLxcn nssIornx7Icm pnIwrzms '-- p^nro PARTS PARTS 30~*504~78 3~78 "| 10~4202~*40~44 ".| an~*uoo-aox_ao vu~�aan~n�o�na 10~*620~560~56 10-*620-560.56 mspAzm pxu7u 10~*540~560~56 RE-PAIR PARTS *s F, ' -- - -- ^ ^! c*o �|' - ------� '----�----� | .. :41 � ,.. H ^°^~cxo � � aEm auppLxcn nssIornx7Icm pnIwrzms '-- p^nro PARTS PARTS 30~*504~78 3~78 "| 10~4202~*40~44 ".| an~*uoo-aox_ao vu~�aan~n�o�na 10~*620~560~56 10-*620-560.56 mspAzm pxu7u 10~*540~560~56 RE-PAIR PARTS *s F, ' -- - -- ^ ^! c*o �|' - ------� '----�----� | .. :41 � ,.. H ^°^~cxo v ° � 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -07 -84 PAGE 13 f�'>lz __ ._CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE !r 126457 _04/26/84_ 2.20.56 R.L.GOULD.. B. CO. INC ------- _GENSUPPLIES_ 20- 4504_ - -64 4 229.56 + - -- _646 - -_- - - "Ic �. 7 -- 7I128459 - - f.. -CKS 11 05/!72/.44 23.91 RITEWAY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 0 -- - - - - -- 23.91 * ----- - - - - - -- -- - -- - -------------------- III - - - - -- - -- ;13, flfr•r * +* -CKS I'.i 128462 04/26/84 49.25 RENTAL EQUIP 8 SALES REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 - "I 49.25 f �I +rf -CKS zll ,I -.- _128469 U4/25194 91.22 ROAD MACHINERY PEPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 128469 04/23/84 46.30 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 137.52 • l z,! ►•* -CKS 128484 04/23/84 124.55 _ AMERICAN_SHARECOM __TELEPfiJONE_ -4256- 51.0 -51 -! 124.55 • ___._____ -10 - - - - -. _ -J" - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- -_ _-- _. -__ -__ ___- ._ -___ -_ - -_ •.f -CKS - 3•.) _ - 128486 04/23/R4 59.00 DON STREICHER GUNS AMMUNITION 10- 4572- 420 -42 59.110 • I ~I .r.r.r 128497 04/23/84 f.. -CKS 73.14 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 73.14 • I '� 7.I #f ifff ------- - - - - -- -- .rr-CKS a� 1284.92 `J5 /02/R4 _____ ___ 345.2it .OUTHDALE FORD __- CCNT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 128492 05/.^.2/84 2.16 SOUTHDALE FORD _ REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 i d 128492 U4/23/84 411.30 SOUTHDALE FOP,D REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 _._ 128492_ 04/23/84 _ 14.64 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 I•::� 128492 U4/23184 1.67 _ SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 - — - =j 128491- 1284_92 X4/23194 04/23/84 13.57 —_ 10. 9SOUTHOALE Sf�UTHDALE FORD FORD__ REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4540 - 560 -56 col 128492 04/23%84 23.19 SOUTHOALE FCRD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 rl 821.90 I..I afr -CKS vs' _ 128495 _-- _047/g4_ - -_ - — 15.0.50- _--- ____$_9UT.H_TDIiN_ RF_E.F�7.IG_ --- __CON CcSSIONS____-- 27- 4248 - 661 -66 150.50 • _ -- - - - - - - '4 71 71 , • i # +••• • • * -C NS v57� 128503 04/23/84 100.00 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP SHORT ON CHECK 10 -4540- 520 -52 ;;I,6 v ° � ti 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 14 CHECK r1l). DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No, INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 128503 04/26/84 102.17 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 1285 - 03 04/27/94 - 286.35 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP PARTS 10-4620-560-56 488.52 ***_C,(S L 128505 05/02/84 36.00 SUfk SALE OF PROPERTY 10-3220-QDO-00 128 5.0.5 _04f27/R4 SUN AOVERTISTNG 10-4210-140-14 128505 05f92/84 11.45 SUN AOWERTISING--------- 10-4210-140-14 121.67 ***-CKS 1285")8 1. - . 04f23/84 0 0 __ __ ____ -S T PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-440-44 128508 04/30114 34.63 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-470-47 42.63 * 128509 04t23/84 -794.72 SCHMITT Misic MUSIC -SUPPLIES �------2b-4596--627--62 294.72 • ***-CKS 128511 04/26/154 33995 SOUTHERN VACUUM SERV SERVICES 50-4236-821-82 128511 d4t23F84 22.95 SOUTHERN VACUUM -CONT _REPA 50-4248-861 86 17 56.90 21l 128512 04/23f84 42,36 S T 2080 GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 42.36 • ***-CKS 05/02/84______ - -_— _99.99 —__ _SEARS ROEBUCK EQUIPMENT 29-1340-000-00 128516 05/42/84 99 . 9 4- SEARS ROEBUCK CORRECTION 29-4900-720-72 128516 05/02/84 99.99 SEARS ROEBUCK CAPITAL OUTLAY 29-4900-720-72 99.99 ***-CKS 128518 134127/84 371.19 BERNADINE SCOFIELD SERVICES 10-4120-490-49 371.18 ***-CKS "''___- _12852- 4______ - 04/27/84 187.93 - TUR _NQU_I_S_T_PAPER-_C0 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504-520-52 187.93 ***_CKS 128526 04/27f84 1 9920.00 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10-4612-560-56 Ile >i rfrirr 7-1 ***-C KS 71 t IM30 U4/26/84 I87.56 S TE XGA CORP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-301 187.50 • 1984 CITY OF EDINA NO. DATE CHECK REGrSTr-R 05-07-84 PAGE 15 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NOe INVe # PeOe 4 MESSAGE %00 3 ***—CKS --1!4 128537 04/27/84 940.00 TRI STATE DRILLING CON ST 26- 1300 - 000 -00 7 - - - -- - .010 7 1 •**-CKS 128539 u4/26/84 455.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 27-4562-662-66 128539 04/23f84 14.50 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS 27-4620-662-66 469.50 ***—CKS 123541 J4/23/84 37.99 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-260-26 129541 04/23/94 29.10 TARGET CLEANING SUPPLIES 27-4512-661-66 128541 C4/23f84 18.97 TARGET CLEANING SUPPLIES 27-4512-661-66 85.06 "J j!71 128546 04/23/84 30 .01 TWIN CITY BOLT PARTS 10-4620-560 -56 ___128546 04123/84 44.23 TWIN BOLT PARTS 128546 04123/84 442.30- -CT-TY- TWIN CITY BOLT CORRECTION 10-4620-560-56 128546 04/23/94 18.95— TWIN CITY BOLT CREDIT 10-4620-560-56 2 4 12 3 / ---- -- -9--4 -- 442.30 TWIN CITY BOLT PARTS 10-4620-560-56 124546 04/23/g4 23.53 TWIN CITY BOLT PARTS 10-4620-560-56 128546 04/23/?4 5.00 TWIN, CITY BOLT PARTS 10-4620-560-56 2- 8 5 46. 04 /231/94 24. °1 TWIN 10-4620-560-50 108.63 .---- -CITY -.BOLT 4.3 C I(S 128550 34/26/84 10.00 TISDEL STANDARD CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 10. - 00 128551 04/23/94 150070 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10-4266-420-42 i. 1285 -51 34/23/ - 84 85^ -. -.A8.-.-------UN-TFQRMS--UNLIM,I-TE.D------U-NIFO-RM ALLOW---------.- 10-4266-421-42 128551 (14/23184 359,55 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10-4266-460-46 19359.73 CKS %0 05/01/84 MAMA MEETING EXPENSES 10-4206-140-14 IE 30.00 128565 04/23f84 18.19 VIKING, INDUSTRL CTR GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-301-30' 18.19 j128566 04/26/84 540.10 VIDEO IMAGES CABLE TV 10-2149-000-00 540.10 C KS %00 1984 rzry OF coz»x L__cwccx w1. oms CHECK REGISTER D5-07-84 PAGE 16 _ umOumr-_' - »Emo01_ � '-]Z�5 69.---'04/2»/V* -_--320~53 Vu��L-%�a_PQVPamE » zo . ss _ �^ ° ' ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* I0)V._»-P°0,-I-MESu4as_- ' 128575 04/26/84 25,9.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 04x26484 30 *90 __-__-:-@'GR4T-w-GER--_-` cnxr scn« °°°~cxa _1385.86� '^--128578 - �uwao/n* - 450.90 u4.x.ozcGLcm co INC souIp ncmrxL .� XEROX onxPonxrznm 7-� *50,00 ^ zz4~0o !�--____-_----_- � � - -- --- ' ' - -�---'-- - '--' - --- --�- 128579 - ----- 64/23x84 '- 79.89 WILLIAMS nrcsL~xouc acm suppLIco |'Tl m85r9 04/23/94 31 .64 uzLLIxno oTccL~wnuE p "Iwr E 128579 04/23m4 71.7* WILLIAMS arccL~wnuc TOOLS '--1285/v ^/ 04/23184 56.41 WILLIAMS srccL~xouc scm muppiIco ! 128579 0*/23/84 ,v.r* WILLIAMS srsrL~eowc scm ouppLzso " 128596 ~-�__�_�_-____��___ 211.00 TELE-TERMINALS ' ' --- --��x�ua- a*�zam* �n�.or- '-�� nonnnw snzrw Co � -GASOLINE 334.R7 ° ncpxrx pxxro smuIp ncmxL ozLss / °**_unS__', 04x26484 30 *90 __-__-:-@'GR4T-w-GER--_-` cnxr scn« °°°~cxa _1385.86� - -- 30.90 ° -i-� moxuv 05/0118* za*.oY XEROX onxPonxrznm 7-� 10~454*~325~30 zz4~0o ° � � - -- --- 40-4504-801-80 ' 126591 05/02/84 66 7 CECELIA SMITH � E CKS v*04vnaya�_x"D25,VV. ___-__�IDn _ ^/ 39025.30 ° 10-4 226-510- 51 |��--°°��°� - - ---'-- - � ------'--------� - " 128596 04/30/84 211.00 TELE-TERMINALS ' 30^6' ~`^ -^~^~`^ S^^^^^^ sp,?o ___---Z.EE-yE�01-CA-L--SE-noT-C-c 70.55 ° � _ ncpxrx pxxro smuIp ncmxL ozLss _.PRO S;-R-V--- / °**_unS__', 30~45 40~748~78 ----------------'-----------'--�-----'-- vU~*ou«~svQ~sx - cnxr scn« °°°~cxa l'"| .'' --��---20~4 226~64 3-64-�---- 27-4200-6.62- 66 ___--__- � _-Com? - 10~4 5 u4~301~30 7-� 10~454*~325~30 1o~4nuo~oov~ou____�� ^ -- � - -- --- 40-4504-801-80 ' T 3 CKS 10-4 226-510- 51 _.PRO S;-R-V--- scm uuppLzco -- --�-----------------'-------�-'----'----�- vU~*ou«~svQ~sx ,. ~ 67 4 -'--- �-| cnxr scn« 27~4200~661~66 / 7.4 SERV 27-4200-6.62- 66 ___--__- _-Com? 7-� - - ^ -- � - -- --- F- 4984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE F- 4 __.C,HECK_N0. DATE AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION ACg.O NT NO* INV. N P.O. # RESSA 17 _ 12871 3 04/23/84 46.46 FOLEY BELSAW CO GEN SUPPLIES 04-_6_ 4 6__6_4 46.46 * 128714 04/23/84 ew 17.98 THE MIRROR PLACE GEN SUPPLIES 17.98 * 10- 4504 - 420 -42 - - - i2c ,71 ___12 8 6-0-3- -- 04/23/54 485*25 WITTEK-GOLF-SUPPLY PARTS 27-46 20- 662-66 3 128603 04/23/94 92.73 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY RANGE BALLS 2:7 636- 663 -66 567.98 _CKS ____2$- 612_ _ _ _ 44/30/8,4 71 .44 MTOW--ST_ ASPHALT COOP -----GEN BLACKTOP 10-4524-3'01-30 • 128612 04/30fR4 199.50 PTOWEST ASPHALT CORP--- S-UP-P-L--T-E-S------------10----45-2--4--301-30 128612 04/23/94 148.50 MIDWEST ASPHALT COPP BLACKTOP 10:4524-301-30 ---12861 2- 04/30F84 --19357.FO MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 20 -1436- 000 -00 3� 128612 04/3,3194 1357.40- MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP CORRECTION - -- - — - ____2d__4524-745-74________ 14: 128612 04/30/84 1.357.80 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 20- 4524 - 745 -74 '16 1___1,2e6 l 2 ______04/39fR4 357,8C MIDWEST.ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 24-4524-745-74 128612 04/30/94 1 9357*90- PTOWEST, ASPHALT CCPP BLACKTOP 24-4524-745-74 128612 04/30134 70.00 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 128612 04/3C/14 457.Rl MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP GE4 SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 783 -78 29315*05 12863.--- __05/C2/84 ___194 .64- MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 128613 04/23184 17.62 MC'klTILUS STEEL GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 128613 U4/3O/84 2U.65 MCNEILUS STEEL GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504:801-80 232.91 73 ***-CKS 12 3616 04/23/84 906.67 MILLIPORE CORP G E m SUPPLIES 1- _0 -_4 5 —0 4- 4 8 -2--- 4- 8__ 906.67 -f* *-CKS cl 128618 04/23/84 52.50___ MIDWEST BADGE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504-420-42 52.50 128705 04/23f84 757.05 757.05 SUPERIOR FORD CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 CKS - I 128110 04/23/84 1000 INTEISrATc. OFFICE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-420-42 - —_ 10.00 128711 04/23/84 32.59 ROBERT rjRUNOSTROM SEMINAR LODGING 10-4202-421-42 32.59 128712 04/23/84 3,713.00 0 ROJRKE - OSANNA INSURANCE 10-4260-100-10 39713.00 _ 12871 3 04/23/84 46.46 FOLEY BELSAW CO GEN SUPPLIES 04-_6_ 4 6__6_4 46.46 * 128714 04/23/84 ew 17.98 THE MIRROR PLACE GEN SUPPLIES 17.98 * 10- 4504 - 420 -42 - - - i2c ,71 1984 cIr, OF coIxA cxcox ncwrorco 05~07~84 P�oc ,n | CHECK NO* DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* rNVo # PoOo N MESSAGE ! � PAGE - ] 7!s -- of/?3�p*--51.69-__ -__Inc�lAIrc�LEE'cn___ ��L--_ ' s,.*p ° _ `| 128f 16 04v23x84 - 50.18 xuro pArmr_opcc sn.1u __nxxrq_� |, ° �------'-------- _ - e-8.7 IT ---04v23/8.4 V_---__��4n�xmo�-m�-'----_ -----PARTS 34.68 ° '-- '--------------' .` ^,""," _'---'- - ".,"","° I 6V .0 U ^vcw,�^x ' cnmr_REPAzuS-__--__---1Q-424a-s60-5a�-_-_ -_.` ; r '| r ---- "! ..^ ^` ''| .` ,. - - _ ,. .�' `.� r� , - �! ` '- - ---- --'- ^i - -' ----'' '^o,,u _ u*/c»'u^ _ _ `/.4v-LOUIS ABRAHAM _ wILcxsc oo~000w- rnv- 7u 0*/23/14 17.*0~ Lcurs nonweAm cunnccTT-Cw------------30~4208~787~78------- � o*vzy/o* 17.41 Lnuzs nzLc«sc 30~4208~787-78 � � ° � � r| +| � 7, 1-11 vu ° =' �-__-zV 19V4/23/u4 � 1n�^�a _-_-�l��L INS -B_c*�L D INC L I�S� ^ v 50.92 ° _soN��P - ------------------------ 12aYa0 .� 3*/23m4 o*~nn uuw/rA onzonEw _ »wnuLAmoc REFUND �yr��o~oun~ou a�.onr. ° ----' - --- - 128721 U4/23184 121.80 HIPH _-SiC 000L___ PRINTING 10-4600-421-42 121 po 128r22 �wzo,V^ _ 145.uo _ z"pnInrsns orrIcc SUPPLIES_ 10~*51*~510~51 05/02f 84 3C.01D _ znpn INTER s pnImrzms � 1rs^oU ° � 128723 04/23,84 13.26 cwrcc INC �mvsm oupp�zcu as~v�o9- �bo~�h---- ` vy,z* ° 04/23/84 - -' 43.56- - -Top muxczrr ruoml''-----ccmccsuznma ---'-------27~**24-664-66--- 05/02ro4 116.00 rop muxLzrr p000u cowCcyozomo 27-*624~664~66 1 28724 -_-- '94v27'84 68.05 TOP QUALITY -FOVnu '-__--_CpNoEXSJJONS- 7-4624~664_ 1 2872 '34/27184 4 3.50 70p uuxLzrr pnuou cowccmuIomo --'---------27~*62*-6*4~66-----' J� ] 271 .05 ° --12 8rz5 u*/zo/o* 160.00 Mox zmCI-' - - onnnn - -- - -----'27~4502--661~66 - ` 128726 owasvn4 124.00 NATHAN o*xPznn _' -------�u� xnuo��mcc-�� FUND '--- v24°00 ° -�128r27 0*v23/84 6*"00 nLxorot'oxxzo - AMBULANCE REFUND " 64.00 IZFt7?8 04/23f94 33 - 68 HELENE CIHAK AMBULANCE REFUND 10-3180-000-00 128129 Lj4/23/84 -_.` ; r '| r ---- "! ..^ ^` ''| .` ,. - - _ ,. .�' `.� r� , - �! ` '- - ---- --'- ^i - -' ----'' '^o,,u _ u*/c»'u^ _ _ `/.4v-LOUIS ABRAHAM _ wILcxsc oo~000w- rnv- 7u 0*/23/14 17.*0~ Lcurs nonweAm cunnccTT-Cw------------30~4208~787~78------- � o*vzy/o* 17.41 Lnuzs nzLc«sc 30~4208~787-78 � � ° � � r| +| � 7, 1-11 Lj—': 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 19 ------CMECK N1. DATE A-MOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 128731 04/23/94 553.38 VAN PAPER COMP PAPER SUPPLIES 50-4514-822-82 Is I 128131 U4/23/84 990.50 VAN PAPER COMP PAPER SUPPLIES 50-4 5 14- 84 2- 8 4 1., i IZ8731 U4/23f84 796.75 VAN PAPER COMP PAPER SUPPLIES 50-4514-862-96 7 ic 128732 04/23/84 'it, 23.00 13 128133 J4/23/84 10.0f) IAFC OPERATION LIFE BOOKS 10-4502-440-44 128734 05/02/84 567.40. CARLSON PRTNTING PRINTING 1 o-4- 600- 510--51 126734 04/27/84 275.30- C4RLSON PRINTING CORRECTION 20-4600— 62 ?- 62 CA RLS PRI NT 1, NG 26-4600-688-68 123734 04/27/84 1 9000.00 CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 28-4600-706-70 128735 34/23/84 600.00 ATLAS PEN & PENCIL PAPER SUPPLIES 27-4514-660-66 � ....^. .-,"',"` ,",."" ° ° ^ WELDING INC Cuw/ nE,x/w» 10~*248~560~56 - .on �___-_ ''---- --- - — - -- ------------- ''�-- -- ----'--- - '��` 128737 34/23/8* 60.00 /mrcaw xosx OF pznc mcnasnoxIp 10~*20*~*40~44 ----��— ---��---*1,00�--�------ ----�—�----------_- -_� - __ !�' '| 128738 04/23/8* *o"vu ?,Pi- Imnuorozco cuuzpmcmT MAImT 10~*274~421~42 �^ __-l�orna o4m0^84_- 1.135.00 MOH INOuSrR7ESx�Vz��cool� �-4914-4zv~42 ~|° ". - _--��ons9 __-��7^� |' - ------- �O--------- !`,| [ 77.20 o*/znvu* � _ 5*.3* - _- TWIN CITY -BOLT �_RcPxInL£ARA 4s*o±s4q_�� | |^. 56°36 -- -- - ---- `'� ' ~ 23/94___ 1-_--128742 - 04 /23/84' ' ,2m7 4.3 a4-/ 2 3r84--___ = 128H744 04 m 3 v8 4 %w 51�3 PARIS- 51.93 ° ��--------------'---'-- _272.11 '---__ AUTO WHOLESALE - REPAIR zra.,v ^ � ----------- - __'-11-8~80---_---000M--SrSI-E-M-S'- vvu°ao ° *n°COg DUG -/NELSON - 281 .30 oARLuommRRzmrzmG 320 30 560-56_--__'-__ -_'- _____zmnr ART CENTER 23-4100-614- 61 PRINTING " - `- 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 23 1 �__-CHECK N1. DATE AMOUNT - VENDOR_ -ITEM- DES-CRIPT-10-N----ACCO-U-NTN-Oo-I-NV9 P_oO.o___#M_E_SS_AGE__- 12! 128148 04/23/84 16.00 PAUL DEcrTRE CLASS REFUND 23-3500-000-00 it 21 Oc 129750 C4/23/84 339097.10 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY lf2 SPECIAL 10-4922-506-50 —10-4922-506-50 128 7 5 -0 04/23/94 .09 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ADD SPECIALS------- 128150 04/23/34 838*31 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ASSESS ON CITY 27-1315-000-00 129750 64.15 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ASSESS ON CITY 50-1315- 000-00 IZ8750 U4/23/84 149.63 DIRECTOR OF PROPERTY ASSESS ON CITY 50-1315-000-00 128751 fj4/23/P4 22.37 PERKIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 20-4504-646-64 .^^ ._`'.~- .-_- ~^-^-^ ^ .—'^^_.~ ._-..^^.^.` .._.-. .~~~~ ., . 752 �4/23v84 12.20 BLAINE c *nnsLxwo_ AMBULANCE REFUND 1p~xvxu~000~oo . 128152 04/23r84 _ � 122.00 _ BLAINE c moncLxmo onnuL«wCc ncrowb------' vo~n,mo~000~oo—'-- 122.00 ° �^ L4/23m* ,a.zn Lo/u Mcmorr ooxnccrIom 0~31 80-000-08----- ----- ----- ' 12 is 15 3 p o4/23v84 va.?0~ LnIs wCwu/7 conRccrInm 10-3180-000-00 f53 o4xzy/�* _ _ 42.100 cu,a *cmur7_ _ _ ____ ncpuNn ' as~nonu~nou~uo 128753 0*/23v9* 4.00 coza nrmurr cLcnzCxL CHARGE 23-3800-000-00 *o°JO ---12 -�,*'vz�/ -----------------z3-o5bn~0no-b0---'--- 8 1s* b^-----------'4 Pt~0b-------cobzE-rcSiER--------'---- REFUND vzmr��~ nwzyxu� �.on cno�c rco��a c�cn�c�� cw�xsco ao~omoo~uoo~uo 52.00 .� ~` 128755 04v231134 144.00 pAnoxocT McoowcLc zmur ART ccmTcm 23~4100~e14~e1 [` -'�_'__--_-----_144°�u.°___-__�___�' ~| `n ,oarno 04v23184 425.00 pnuc cozm Imsr ART ccmrcm ao~*1 DO- 6v«~ax � 425"00°-_-_-__-_--_____-____�__-_-_�___-__'-_----_---_--_--_-_------____ L.1 101 ^°^-cxo Jfl s 87*9-' 04r26/84-----------'16s.bo------'-GOPHER OIL CO —PARTS -----'-------------�1o~4*zd~5ko~56-------- 128760 04v26/84 s°nn~ snpHco nzc CO cncorr 10~*620~560~56 c�^ 1287*1 o*/zavn* e3.85 cnxwc pxcmIms ncp*zo pxnrn 40~45*0~801~80 `- [76= �� " - ---- 1984 CITY OF Eor�A CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 4 el - C�ECKONO.. DATE - AMOUMT VE NDOR -----ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT -NO. INV. # P.Clo # MESSAGE 04/26/84 405.54 CRANE PACKING REPAIR PARTS 40-4 540- 801-80 128762 J4/26/94 48. f) 3 PFC EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS, 128763 04/26/84 110.00 INTERN HOUGH DIVIS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 10-4504-340-30 56.0 5 128765 04f26f84 106.00 DODD TECHMICAL CORP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-540-54 106.00 128766 04/26/94 29140.00 METRO MECH CONTRACT CONST 23-1300-000-00 __128766 D4/26/84 39403.82 METRO MEC.14 CONTRACT CONSTRUCTION 23-1300-000-00 04/26/84 160.00 BEACON PRODUCTS CO GEN SUPPLIES 1-7 3C-4248- 781-78 128769 04/26/84 600.00 APERICAN LANNING CCNF 10-4202-120-12 128170 U4/26/84 61.29 E Z SHARP INC GEN SUPPLIES 128772 fj4f26/94 53 80 LA4C CONCESSIONS -4624- 128773 04/26/84 151.51 28-4COO-706- ICE SKATING INST PRINTING 151.51 J UNEMP COMP 10-4160-510-51 128775 04/26/84 59456.05- WK DEPT OF CORRECTION 10-4160-510-51 1287?6 a4/26/84 100.00 PAUL TODD BA:HMANS DEMON 23-4200- 610- 61 128TZ8 0-27.84 .,'.~.~. ^°°°` °,"°. COATING Cvm, wcpxzmo sO~�o«m~u�n~m� ��—'----------l`'� ' 7,900.03 ° .~ [76= �� " 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-07-84 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE 128779 04/27/84 BRA MAR QUIK 04/27/84 37o2O GOLF PROPERTIES INC MACH EQUIP 27-1340-000-00 13 1 128780 0 5i02/R4 49600.00 GOLF PROPERTIES INC MACH & EQUIP 27-1 340-GUO-OD 1 128780 U4/27f84 39720.00 GOLF c)ROPERTIES INC MACH EQUIP 27-1340-MO-00 261 .25 123783 C4/27/24 128184 64/27f84 150 .00 PAM SONZELET 128785 04/27/84 144,00 128786 J 40127 84 6,000.00 l2bT88 -J4/27/84 90-00 1287138 04/27/84 447 BUREAU OF NATL DUES 10-4264 146-14 Cl 29.00 128790 J4/30f94 15.48 PERKINS GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-421-42 128791 U4/-30/ 84 15.00 -MARY srNGHER REIMBURSEMENT 10-4202-460-46 128792 J4/30/ VEIT 128794 04/30/94 113.76 CLEVELAND COTTON A TS 128794 34 /30 184 56*89 CLEVELAND COTTON PARTS 27-4620 662-66 4 170. 64 128795 0 5 01 f8 4 9*38 50TH FRANCE MEETING EXPENSES 50-4 206— 820- 82 [ 7°~»' ° J288n1051l�o4____-__'_--v�"8 J0�Ug�00 124.00 ° � / 1aU807 05v01v84 - ,a*"oV --_- _ALICE /yLBxNn�� _--'- '—AMBULANCE 80-000-00 |=\ 124.00 ° ��-----�-------- - 550.00 . 1984 CITY OF EDINA 128803 0 CHECK REGISTER 215.00 F 05-07-84 PAGE 23 - 1 128803 0 05fOl/84 3 389.00 F FTTNr-'SS STORE � CHECK Nn. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR -1-TEM -DES-CRIPTI-ON -----ACCOUNT NOe INV. X PeOe A-MESSAGE-- 9 38 128796 05/01/84 1,499.02 IBM CORP EQUIP RENTAL 10-4 226- 510- 51 128797 0 5 /01 /3 4 175 .060 ACME WINDOW CLEANING CONT SERV 123798 05/01184 10.00 50-4214-8 2 82 13 VFW ADVERTISING 128798 05/01/84 10.00 VFW ADVERTISTRG 50-4214-842-84 125798 U5/01/84 10.00 VFW ADVERTISING 50-4214- 862- 86 128800 05/01/84 79.89 ..DARRELL- HEYERHOLM_ AMBULANCE-m- FUND 1-0-3180-900-00 [ 7°~»' ° J288n1051l�o4____-__'_--v�"8 J0�Ug�00 124.00 ° � / 1aU807 05v01v84 - ,a*"oV --_- _ALICE /yLBxNn�� _--'- '—AMBULANCE 80-000-00 |=\ 124.00 ° ��-----�-------- GYM EQUIP nvn couzp avm comIp 128804 05/01/84 180.00 JOE BTERNET onoxmzor 128805 05/01/14 50.CO PARK NIC MEDICAL scnImun — -- 128806 35/01/94 133.33 INDUS WASTE SYSTEMS _ omxr ocnv 128807 U5/01/84 106.93 MN DEPT OF REVENUE sxyoLzmE 128808 U5/01184 30*00 STATE TREAS cEnrzzcxrzom 128809 05/01/84 1101.00 WALL STREET JOURNAL uuaaonzp7zom comT ocnv -- ----- 1g~f5n4-5VQz�q no ln~*s9*~o~so 10~45 9*~500~50 28~4 200~706~70 10~*204~1*0~14 -10~4200~3*5~30 10~**12~560~56 ' ---- 30~4310~780~78 1n~42o�~^4n~^^ � � .'� | ' ---'---� -- ---- �1 .| - - -- '. ^ ' — -- — --- �--'— ---�--''�] _ --. '— '' 4o~4z DO- uo1~on c| 128811 U5/Ul/94 95.00 HOPKINS PLUMBING REFUND METER 30-3530-000-00 17, � 550.00 . .-FITNESS. ' 128803 0 05/01/84 2 215.00 F FTTNESS STORE - 1 128803 0 05fOl/84 3 389.00 F FTTNr-'SS STORE � _ omxr ocnv 128807 U5/01/84 106.93 MN DEPT OF REVENUE sxyoLzmE 128808 U5/01184 30*00 STATE TREAS cEnrzzcxrzom 128809 05/01/84 1101.00 WALL STREET JOURNAL uuaaonzp7zom comT ocnv -- ----- 1g~f5n4-5VQz�q no ln~*s9*~o~so 10~45 9*~500~50 28~4 200~706~70 10~*204~1*0~14 -10~4200~3*5~30 10~**12~560~56 ' ---- 30~4310~780~78 1n~42o�~^4n~^^ � � .'� | ' ---'---� -- ---- �1 .| - - -- '. ^ ' — -- — --- �--'— ---�--''�] _ --. '— '' 4o~4z DO- uo1~on c| 128811 U5/Ul/94 95.00 HOPKINS PLUMBING REFUND METER 30-3530-000-00 17, � 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGIST--_R 05-07-84 PAGE 24 - C - HECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM—DESCRIPTI-ON -------ACCOUNT -NO_* INV. # -Pe 0 . MESSAGE 128814 05/01f84 4.90 MARION .- WARD ART 128815 05/01/84 14.00 KAY SCHLOSSER ART WORK SOLD 23-3 6 25-66C-b C 123816 05/01/84 22.40 13ETTY PEDDIE ART 39.50 VI 0 BRIEN ART WORK SOLD -3625-000-00 128818 05/Ul/84 3.50 MARGARET NOROSTOG ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 / ^°°~cwo ' 128820 U5/01/84 21.00 OBERONLESLIE -ART-WORK-S OLD 23-3625-000-00 ' ' 23-3625-000-00 3.P5 -PAT 128824 U5/01/�4 5.95 3RDER ART WORK SOLD 23-36 25- 000-40 I DICK GREEN ART WORK SOLD 23-3625 -60C-60— 128826 U5/01f84 4.55 MIMI EXON ART WORK SCLD_ -23-3625-000-00- 128828 05/01f84 39.20 _____EDYTH__BLUSKE ART WORK—SoLo 23-3625-000--60 128329 05/01/84 38.40 ALICE DANYLUK ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00, 128830 05/01194 6*?3 PHY"LL,'PS HAYWA ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 — ` vvm* rzry OF cnzxx oxccw xcszorsn os~or~o^ pxsc as � -oxrc _ _ xMoumr _ _ _Vcmonq ' _ ITEM DESCRIPTION mx°_wp°o _w_nE S S.AGE______ - - ___sr.n4-__-___� .� _ sr.o* °- ----��--------------�------------`- __�aVo32 _ _ y5/0219* _ 28.50 _______xE�oOnS- SUPPLY |'| 28.00 ° -_ __.. --'EAuI2_ _2��427�661�6 ----- --'-- ----'--'- " � 43 .00 ______U5fJ2/84_ CONSTRUCTIOIJ 20-14 21-000-00 128!540 U51U2134 49.85 --- LYNDALE HARDWARE CO SUPPLIES 10-4 504- 318- 30 12884C 05/02184 21.99 LYNDALE HARDWARE C0__ -GEN GEN SUPPLIES--------10-4504-318-30 UTO N) 128343 05/02/84 475.00 ROBERT SOBCOVIAK GEN SUPPLIES 129844 b5102184 7.F0 SUPPLIES RESALE 23-1209-000-00 1 128844 05/02184 13.75 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES 23-34 45-000-00 128347 05/02184 49600.30 50TH & FRANCE BUS !71 ' " � 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER C5 -07 -84 PAGE 26 v h CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT _ _VEND- 0A ITEM DESCRIPTION N00 I-NV. 9 -P.09 p_-PESSAGE J s 79148.00 + .I 128849 U5/U2/84 27.36 MOLLIE PAULSON X GIFT SHOP 23- 4200 - 610 -61 ' " 27.36 • ^ I 128850 05/02/84 25.00 ATOM CONFERENCE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 Q 128951 05/02/64 105.00 CARALYN HIVELSRUD PER ORDINANCE 10- 3220- 000 -00 " 105.00 • "/ 1281652 U5/U2/84 340.50 RON LUND AUCTIONEER FEE 10- 3220 - 000 -00 � 340.50 + -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - -- I, e " °T, 1T2 128228 04/27/84 31. a 5 1)�LI S7 BOMoAl1TQ SUE? Y RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 440 -44 04/27/84 14.12 crap ICH onKInir_ G . _ GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504 - 446 -44 10314 04/27/84 2.60 40414414 --C-0 GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 =� 14i343 J4/27/84 456.33 `..,,.., "1 ^' n'•,�� r G0 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 Sy i8�r3 04/27/94 04/27194 45.48 1 _R1Gii °"- -•r GO TOOLS PARTS 10- 4580 - 560 -56- 10- 4620 560 _ " 19441#4 04127/84 913!'•.67 85.58 _ _ EMRIGI• °"'• "r r^ GEN SUPPLIES - -56 20- 4504 - 646 -64 �1831-43 04/27/!64 22.60 SMR;GH BAKING re GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 707 -70 - - }83143 04/27/84 42.20 EPRIG H e.14.Nr r CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 1 9R31 4 3 ' - - -- — - - - — -- - -- - - -- - - -- I • +••.• CKS 1339851.75 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND j 209645.27 _ FUND 20 TOTAL PORK FUND 89976.46 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 7,940.J0 FUND_ 26 TOTAL POOL FUND Computer checks Vs a " 28. FUND 27 __SWIMMING TOTAL - - - -- GOLF COURSE FUND - -- -- 55185 thru 56472 l! ' 39702.26 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND ! 99.99 _ FUND 29 TOTAL- GUN RANGE FUND 209919.37 FUND 30 __. TOTAL WATERWORK FUND 19250.39 FUND 40 TOTAL SEWER RENTAL FUND 1Z 455.55 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 'i 1,884.91 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND APF, C;= -J ,, -C i PAYMENT, ` 2409083.18 TOTAL Wil � i 6.I L.,TE -� ko - - - - - -— NANCE i r • . (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA - 262 S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, May 21, 1984, at 7:00 P.M:, to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated -by the City as set forth below: -WEST 44TH STREET - T.H. 100 TO BROOKSIDE AVENUE ESTIMATED COST PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P - BA - 262 $356,063.23 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvements includes Lot 17 and 19, Aud. Sub'd. No. 176; Lots 10 and 11, Thielen's Brookside; Lots 7 and 8, Sud. Subd. No. 176; Lots 1,2, and 3, Block 4, Arden Park Third Addition; and Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Arden Park 3rd Addition. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON MAY 9 AND 16, 1984 PLEASE SEND US (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION a TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: FRANCIS HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINEER VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: FEASIBILITY REPORT, 84 -2 - SET HEARING DATE The following improvements have been investigated and it has been determined that they are feasible, and their construction would be in the best interest of the overall development of the City of Edina. IMPROVEMENT AND LOCATION ESTIMATED COST P -BA -262 Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb and Gutter and Bridge Replacement W. 44th Street from Soo Line Railroad to T. H. 100 $356,063.23 This project would be a State -Aid funded project with a special assessment to abutting property,owners. The proposed hearing date would be May 21, 1984. P- AQ -84 -3 Weed Harvesting Indianhead Lake $10,400.00 This project would be assessed with some proposed general fund contribution as in past harvesting projects. The proposed hearing date would be May 21, 1984. FJH:lm 5/4/84 G P -A q- tv -3 CITY OF EDINA 4801 : "Jest 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HARVESTING OF AQUATIC !'DEEDS AND TREATMENT 'OF iNDIANHEAD LAKE On Monday, May 21, 1984, the Edina City Council will conduct a public hearing to determine the necessity of undertaking a wee4 harvesting project as well as the aeration and chemical treatment bf Indianhead Lake during 1984, and 'if found necessary, to order undertaking of this work as an assessable project. This hearing will be held at 7 :00 p.m, at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street. If the project is ordered, it is expected that the total cost of harvesting, aeration, and chemical treatments would *be assessed against benefitted properties, Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefitted. The estimated total cost of the proposed project is. Weed Harvesting $5,200 Aeration and Treatments 5, 200 $10,400 Total Based upon this estimate, the total assessment per dwelling is estimated to be $315.15. The area proposed to be assessed includes all lots which are riparian to Indianhead Lake. These properties are described as follows: Lots 2 -6, Block 5, Indian Hills Lots 12 - 19, Block 5, Indian Hills Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Indianhead Crest Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Indianhead Lake View Addition Lot 35, Auditors Subdivision No. 196 Tract A, R.L.S., No. 86 Lots 1 - 3, Block 1, Claudia Ridge Lots 1. - 3, Block 2, Sally Addition Lots 1 - 5, Block 1, Overholt Hills James Addition If approved, this project will be undertaken in 1984. Assessments would be levied later this year and would be due and payable in full in 1985. Please forward any comments or suggestions to the City Council in care of City Hall prior to the hearing or be present at the hearing itself. The project may be modified based upon the views expressed to the Council. All recommendations and objections will be heard at said meeting:" BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. MARCELLA M. DAEHN CITY CLERK CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STORAGE OF WATER ON PART OF LOT 2, BLOCK 3, SCHEY'S PARK VIEW THIRD ADDITION IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on June 4, 1984, at 7 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easement for storage of water: That part of Lot 2, Block 3, SCHEY'S PARK VIEW THIRD ADDITION described as follows: Commencing at the northeast corner of said Lot 2; thence on an assumed bearing of West, along the north line of said Lot 2, a distance of 120.00 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land to be described; thence on a bearing of South, a distance of 30.00 feet; thence South 40 degrees 06 minutes 03 seconds West, a distance of 60.00 feet along a line which, if extended, would intersect the south line of said Lot 2 at a point therein distant 200.00 feet west of the southeast corner of said Lot 2; thence North 32 degrees 15 minutes 21 seconds West, a distance of 51.91 feet; thence North 45 degrees 00 minutes West, a distance of 9.90 feet; thence North 66 degrees 48 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 15.23 feet; thence North 86 degrees 17 minutes 05 seconds West, a distance of 77.16 feet; thence South 67 degrees 22 minutes 48 seconds West, a distance of 26.00 feet, to the west line of said Lot 2; thence north, along the west line of said Lot 2, a distance of 24.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence east, along the north line of said Lot 2, to the point of beginning. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk 1_ L ' a - .._ - -.. ._ y ..._ ___ ��.._ ,:_ Via_`' � .. _ ... _ .- . - - -__.- . -•- - - - - -- -_ __._....__ _ Sat k-,�14- �--- 0 CB �K Aea �u El -T - - --/l --/l - o_ �il� �iea.� �.n�. � ✓n�iC - �l�l�2� eQ -�v-to '-7Zk aU, U �_ � saw- °° -�..� �— _. -- �i�rr0 ice. � � /� �-,-, / �' ,/� _ _ - xlfA6�- I � l C ' .GC+t4 L J� /6- .cam��a%�✓� �#, o-�-. �a , lip �,�.,�a � .) __ 7ha� � de�E�f 1%�Ctl� Iq .0 Ex h �tA V / IJ2. 4z, 4-7-L _ C3 _ 1601- 7_ Iv i we ec WL Of i I) /4 \ 1�^ .(�e i 41 7-L - -- - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- C� -- - - -- -- - - --