HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-06-18_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 18, 1984
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - T. Lea Todd
MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of June 4, 1984, and the Special Meeting of
June 7, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of seconded
by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager and Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if
improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Permanent Street Surfacing with Curb & Gutter and BridQement Replacement
Improvement No. P -BA -262
W. 44th Street from Soo Line Railroad to T.H. 100 (Contd from 5- 21 -84)
II.. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions,
Flood Plain Permits, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and
Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. Gustafson Replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills - Generally located west
of Indian Hills Road and north of Dakota Trail (Contd from 5/21/84)
B. Appeal of Board of Appeals & Adjustments Decision
1. Robert Bossman - 4609 Moorland Avenue
C. Zoning Change
1. Indian Hills 2nd Addition - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2
Double Dwelling Unit District
D. Conditional Use Permit
1. Parking Lot Expansion - Southdale Hennepin County Library - 7001 York Av.
(Convene HRA for Joint Meeting with Council for Purpose of Discussion and
Action on Agenda Item II.E.)
E. Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. William Barbeau -. Metropolitan Open Space Committee
B. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 12, 1984
C. Set Hearing Date - Vacation of Wetland Easement - Lot 6, Block 1,
The Habitat (7/16/84)
D. Edina Foundation - Unexpired term of Dick Wyatt
E. Feasibility Report 484 -3 - Set Hearing Date (7/2/84)
F. Moratorium on Development of Shoreline Areas
G. Draft Weed Ordinance No. 1040
H. Amend Council Minutes of April 4, 1983
I. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
J. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
V. ORDINANCES. First Reading of Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only.
3/4 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass if Second Reading is waived.
A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading)
1. Ordinance No. 171 -A16 - To Add a Certain Fee Number
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
VI. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by , for payment of the
following Claims as per Pre -List dated 6/14/84: General Fund $165,371.62,
Park Fund $22,809.03, Art Center $3,679.53, Swimming Pool Fund $54,608.90,
Golf Course Fund $13,269.92, Recreation Center Fund $4,238.38, Gun Range
Fund $247.09, Waterwork Fund $22,833.64, Sewer Rental Fund $6,530.68,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $112,033.91, Construction Fund $45,782.48, Total
$451,405.18, and for Confirmation of the following Claims dated 5/31/84:
General Fund $106,664.11, Park Fund $3,102.80, Art Center $269.83, Swimming
Pool Fund $1,189.16, Golf i Course Fund $5,319.03, Recreation Center Fund
$4,783.80, Gun Range Fund $80.03, Waterwork Fund $1,894.74, Sewer Rental
Fund $310.16, Liquor Dispensary Fund $257,347.09, Total $380,960.75
w
r
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 4, 1984
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
KIM HOLLAND AND KAREN KISER COMMENDED. Mr. Rosland introduced Kim Holland and
Karen Kiser, advising that both are leaving the employ of the City. Kim Holland
has been custodian of City Hall since September of 1981, and has done a commendable
job in maintaining the building. Karen Kiser has worked as a secretary in the
Police Department since October of 1979, and initiated the data entry system for
that department. She has been a conscientious worker and her pleasant personality
will be missed. He commended both Kim and Karen and presented them with silver pens
bearing the City logo, in appreciation of their service to the City. Members of
the Council also extended their appreciation and thanks.
OUTSTANDING ACHIEVEMENT AWARD FOR ACCIDENT PREVENTION PRESENTED. On behalf of
the Minnesota Safety Council and the Edina Citizens Safety Council, Alison Fuhr
presented the Outstanding Achievement Award in recognition of outstanding - accident
prevention performance in traffic safety to the City of Edina for 1983. Mayor
Courtney accepted the Award on behalf of the City.
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of May 7, 1984, and May 21, 1984, were approved as
submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Schmidt.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR MILLER ADDITION CONTINUED TO JULY 2, 1984. Member
Richards asked -that he be excused from the meeting so that there would be no
appearance of possible conflict of interest with regard to the - Miller Addition.
Mr. Hughes recalled that at its meeting of May 21,..1984, the Council had taken
action to continue the hearing for preliminary plat approval for the Miller Addition
to this meeting so that the issues of access by condemnation, site drainage and
the relationship of the Miller plat to the proposed plat east of Dearborn Street
could be researched. Mr. Hughes advised that the plat to the east is entitled
"Blake Woods" and was reviewed by the Community Development and Planning
Commission at its last meeting. He..stated that the Blake Woods plat involves
three existing lots on the east side.;of Dearborn proposed to be replated into
four lots. The plat relies on vacation of the unused portion of Dearborn to the
north as well as vacation of Spruce Road along the north property...line.- The.
four new lots would be arranged around a new cul -de -sac on Dearborn and would be
located opposite the westerly extension of Dearborn Street as proposed by the
plat of Miller Addition. The proposed Blake Wood plat depends,=to -a .certain
extent, on access to the Miller Addition. Mr. Hughes recalled that the Miller
Addition relies upon the acquisition of right of way across lots on the west side
of Dearborn which are not owned by the proponent. If access to the Miller Addition
is not acquired, some modifications to Blake Woods will be needed. In staff's
view, the existing access to the Miller property via Dearborn Street and Spruce
Road must then be-preserved.. As an alternative,.access.:to, the Miller.property
from Harrison Avenue to the west may be possible..:Although..no right of.way exists._..
for such a street, it appears that some parcels presently owned by the public could
be used as right of way. David Licht, Northwest Associated Consultants, was present
representing . the proponent. He recalled that two concerns were voiced over other
issues at the last meeting: 1) drainage and 2) benefit derived by condemnation.
He then summarized his letter of June 4,:.1984, addressed to the Council, that.while
the Millers would undoubtedly benefit, there are indeed advantages for the City as
a whole, the specific area and notably, the Kuenzlies. He pointed out again that
the lot layout which has been suggested for the Miller land represents a reasonable
and good design and use of the property. Len Kraemar of Barr Engineering Company
reviewed the storm water drainage plan and presented graphics showing what would
occur with a 100 -year rain storm. He stated that they had taken into consideration
all ultimate development in the area._...No.property.to ... the south..would_be.inundated
and::.no.property to the west would be inundated except for a little portion of the
alley. He also pointed out options which may be considered. Member Bredesen
asked if any properties would be inundated with a 100 -year event whose property now
would not be inundated. Mr. Kraemar atated that there..are properties that would
now be inundated which would not be under the proposed plan and that no other
properties would be inundated. In response to Member Schmidt, he stated that an
outlot would be connected to the main inundation area. Member Bredesen asked for
Engineer Hoffman's opinion as to the proposed drainage plan. Mr. Hoffman responded
that all possible options for drainage have been presented and if the properties
to the east are developed a storm sewer system will be required which goes to the
east towards the pond in the area east of Griffit Street and north of Maloney Avenue.
fW
James Miller, the proponent, reiterated that it is in the City's best interest to
develop that land. He stated that the proposed plat is a reasonable lay -out of the
area and asked that it be approved. Greg Abbott, 315 Harrison Avenue, expressed
concern about having 12 feet of fill directly behind his property. John Harper,
Dunkley and Bennett, stated he was appearing on behalf of Bernard and Beverly Kuenzli.
He argued in opposition to the following issues: 1) taking of the Kuenzli property
to provide access, 2) that there would be no drainage problems, and 3) that the area
should be developed. Appearing and speaking in opposition to the proposed subdivision.
were: Craig and Janet Postier, 311 Harrison Avenue; C. M. Simonson,.305 Harrison Av.;
Beauford Carlson, former owner at 6600 Belmore Lane; and Robert Baker, 6600 Belmore Ln.
Council then discussed and considered the following with regard to the proposed plat:
1) change in topography, 2) lot sizes in neighborhood, 3) cul -de -sac, 4)landscaping
and grading , 5) access by condemnation, 6) drainage, and 8) if the low lots were
buildable. Member Schmidt commented that if the subject property is going to be
developed, she believed the proposed.plan is the best possible.way..for . everyo.ne.
Member Schmidt then made a motion to grant preliminary plat approval based upon
acceptable landscape plans and grading plans that would meet the concerns of the
neighborhood. Motion was seconded by Member Turner, giving these reasons that she
felt the drainage questions would be resolved so that property owners on Harrison
would not be adversely impacted and that from a planning point of view it is the
best way to access -the area and therefore the plat and the condemnation is appro-
priate. Mayor Courtney commented that he has not been sold on the idea that any
of the methods of access that have been presented are helping anyone except one
property owner. Member Bredesen stated that he felt the proposed plan was a good
use of the - property, that he felt.the'drainage questions would not be major, but
that he felt the main problem is the effect of this particular condemnation in that
it cuts the Kuenzli property in half and alters that property. Mr. Licht submitted
that if the access to the Miller property has to be created by way of Dearborn,
then there would be more disruption of topography to the Kuenzli property. Mrs. Kuenzli
advised that'she has just heard that Blake School is planning some construction and
may need.access.for their buses into their parking lot from Harrison, which access
would abutt the Kuenzli property. Member Turner stated this would be a factor to
consider. Bernard Kuenzli noted that the major problem is the southern four lots
and asked.if the lots could be condemned, and left as open property. Mayor Courtney
stated that there was a motion before.the Council. .Attorney Erickson pointed out
that preliminary plat approval should be conditioned upon 1) conveyance of the out -
lot by the proponent to the Kuenzlis, and 2) that all costs of condemnation would be
the responsibility of the proponent.' He advised that if the proponent meets the
conditions which are imposed by preliminary plat approval then the proponent is
entitled to final approval. If conditions are imposed at time of final approval and
those conditions are met then he is entitled to delivery of the plat and appropriate
resolution. As. suggested by Mayor Courtney, Mr. Erickson explained that it may be
wise to have the landscape.and gradirig plans presented to the Council before preli-
minary plat approval, and that preliminary and final plat approval could be granted
at the same time. Member Schmidt then stated she would retract the motion for preli-
minary plat approval as-she felt there were too many things to consider. Member
Turner then withdrew the second to the motion. Member Schmidt thereupon moved that
preliminary plat approval be continued to July 2, 1984, so that the questions of the
Council concerning landscaping, topography, condemnation and the Blake School plans
could be addressed— Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Bredesen then addressed Mr. Miller and Mr. Kuenzli and asked that they try to
work out .a.solution_to-the problem.of.access. for the plat prior to the next meeting
when Council presumably will take formal action.
(Member Richards returned to the meeting at this point.)
VARIANCE GRANTED FOR LOT 18, BLOCK 1, THE TIMBERS; APPEAL DENIED FROM BOARD DECISION.
Affidavit of Mailing was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the appeal of Roger Christgau with regard to
a decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments on May 17.' 1984... The.'issue was a
five foot rear yard setback variance; involving Lot 18, Block 1, The Timbers (6417
Timber Ridge). In the platting of the Timbers, several lots were platted with rather
difficult lot shapes and lot depths for the construction of homes. The subject lot
is one of those. The request was toy construct a home designed to accommodate the
topography and shape of the lot. The proposed building would conform to all setback
requirements with the exception of one corner that encroaches five feet into the .
required 25 foot rear yard. The proponent requested a variance to permit approximately
32 square feet of building to encroach on the rear yard. Mr. Hughes pointed out that
under the new Zoning Ordinance there is a provision for "pie- shaped" lots which
creates & hypothetical lot.line and;if the subject lot would be so classified a rear
yard variance would not be required. However, given the shape of the property staff
felt a variance was appropriate and recommended approval to the Board of Appeals and
Adjustments. At its May 17 meeting the Board moved to accept the hypothetical rear
line measurement and accept the plans presented without a variance. The decision
was later appealed by Dr. Christgau for consideration by Council. Ann Fallon, owner
of the subject lot, advised that the proposed house was staked last week and is now
positioned on the lot to only require a 1.5 foot variance. She stated that the abutt-
ing neighbors had no objections to the plan, that the house would be an attractive
addition to the area and would create a good revenue base for the City. She empha-
sized that the plan for the house was revised a number of times to conform as closely
as possible to the lot shape. Folke Victorsen, 6440 Indian Hills Pass, spoke in
support of the Fallon's plan. Dr. Roger Christgau, 6500 Indian Hills Pass, presented
the following arguments in objection: 1) that the Zoning Ordinance defines setback
requirements which should be adhered to, 2) that the subject lot is not a "pie- shaped"
lot as believed by the Board, and 3) that the Board's decision would set a precedent
with regard to other lots having difficult shapes. He noted that he was particularly
concerned that Lot 15, Block 1, would also request a variance. Lee Kopp, 6504 Indian
Hills Road, stated that Lot 15 has very few trees remaining and that he was concerned
that a precedence would be set for further variances of this kind. Member Turner
asked if Lot 15 could be interpreted as a "pie- shaped" lot with establishment of a
imaginery rear lot line. Mr. Hughes responded that it has the same characteristics
of Lot 18 as to.shape and if the Board's opinion on Lot 18 is upheld, that logic
would be likely be followed for Lot 15. In response to question of Member Schmidt,
Attorney Erickson clarified that the application was for a variance, based on staff
interpretation that a variance was needed for the four -sided lot, and that it was
the question before the Board and should have been decided. On that basis, Council
should grant the variance or deny it. Member Bredesen commented that this is an
unusual piece of property and that the Board had used considerable logic in coming
to, the conclusion they reached. Member Bredesen then moved for denial of the appeal
ad for granting of the variance requested for Lot 18, Block 1, The.Timbers. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner. Member Richards stated he could not support the
motion as he felt it would set a precedent for Lot.15, and that he felt..the
concerns expressed by the neighbors objecting to the variance were valid ones.
Member Bredesen clarified that his motion was based on his conclusion that the
proposal required .a variance and that such a variance should be granted. Mayor
Courtney then called for a vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards, Schmidt
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
CONTINUED TO JUNE 18, 1984. As recommended by staff, Member Turner's motion was
,seconded by Member Richards to continue the public hearing on the Grandview Area
Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project to June 18, 1984.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
LOT DIVISION FOR LOT 4, BLOCK 1, MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 8TH ADDITION APPROVED.
Mr. Hughes presented the petition for division of Lot 4, Block 1, McCauley Heights
8th Addition, generally located east of County Road No. 18 and north of Indian
Hills Road. He advised that the request is for a party wall division of an
existing two - family dwelling.. He noted that individual utilities are provided
and staff would recommend approval. No objections being heard, Member.Richards
offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RT: Q0T TTTTOTT
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 4, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition, and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 4, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition, which lies
northerly of a line herein called "Line A ") drawn from a point on the
west line of said Lot 4, distant 77.20 feet southerly of the northwest
corner of said Lot 4 to a point on the east line of said Lot 4, distant
72.64 feet southerly of the northeast corner of said Lot 4,
and
All of Lot 4, Block 1, McCauley Heights 8th Addition except that part
which lies northerly of said Line A;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina -
Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but,are not waived for any other purpose or
as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that
no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with
the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of
this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt', Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
6/4/84 �
I
LOT DIVISION FOR LOT 30, COLONIAL GROVE 2ND ADDITION APPROVED. Mr. Hughes pre-
sented the petition for division of, Lot 30, Colonial Grove Addition, generally
east of Brookview Avenue and south of 56th Street. He advised that the applicant,
who resides at 5615 Brookview Avenue, proposes to acquire a three foot wide
strip of property from his neighbor to the south to facilitate construction of
an addition which will conform with serback requirements. The lot and dwelling
to the south will continue to conform with zoning.requirements and staff would
recommend approval. No objections' being heard, Member Turner offered the
following resolution and moved itsiadoption:
iRESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 30, "Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn. "; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Lot 30 "Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn. ", except the northerly
three (3) feet thereof,
and
Lot 32, "Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn." and the northerly
three (3) feet of Lot 30, "Colonial Grove 2nd Addition, Edina, Minn. ";
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land'do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulationslas contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
LOT DIVISION FOR LOT 11, BLOCK 5,'PARKWOOD KNOLLS APPROVED. Mr. Hughes presented
the petition for division of Lot 11, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls, generally located
west of Schaefer Road and south of Knoll Drive. He advised that two single family
dwellings on Knoll..Drive are involved and that the proponent.is requesting the
division of Lot 11, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls for the purpose of conveying a portion
of his lot to the owner of Lot 12: A portion of the swimming pool and dog kennel
on Lot 12 was apparently constructed across the common lot line with Lot 11 several
years ago. The proposed division represents the resolution of an adverse possess-
ion claim by the owner of Lot 12.1 Setback requirements for the home on Lot 11 con
tinue to be met after the division. The proposed division appears to remedy the
,.encroachment problem caused by'the swimming pool and staff therefore recommends
approval. It should be noted that;the ordinances require a 20 foot setback for the
dog kennel. The proposed division provides a 6 foot setback. Thus, if total com-
pliance with all ordinances is desired, the relocation of the kennel may be desirable:
and the owner of Lot 12 has been so advised. No objections being heard, Member
Turner offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 11, Block 5, "Parkwood Knolls "; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ")described as follows:
Lot 11, Block 5, "Parkwood Knolls" except that part which lies easterly and
southeasterly of the following described line (herein called "Line A "):
Beginning at the northeasticorner of said Lot 11; thence southwesterly
130.70 feet along a line, if extended, would intersect the south line
of said Lot 11 at a point therein distant 58.05 feet westerly from the
southeast corner of said Lot 11; thence southerly to the southeast
corner of said Lot 11 and !there terminating, according to the recorded
plat thereof,
and
Lot 12, Block 5, "Parkwood Knolls" and that part of Lot 11, Block 5,
"Parkwood Knolls" which lies easterly and southeasterly of said Line A.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825; 1
6/4/84
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina"
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordi-
nance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as
separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other prupose or as to any other
provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further sub-
division be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted:
HEARING DATES SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff, Member
Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Schmidt, setting the following hearing
dates for planning matters:
1) Indian Hills 2nd Addition - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double
Dwelling Unit District - June 18, 1984;
2) Blake Woods: - .Preliminary Plat Approval - Generally located east of Dearborn
Street and north of Belmore Lane - July 2, 1984;
3) Southdale Hennepin County Library - Conditional Use Permit - Parking Lot
Expansion - June 18, 1984.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON VACATION OF WATER STORAGE EASEMENT /LOT 2, BLOCK 3, SCHEY'S
PARK VIEW THIRD ADDITION; VACATION NOT GRANTED. Affidavits of Notice were presen-
ted by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman
presented the request for vacation of water storage easement on Lot 2, Block 3,
Schey's Park View Third Addition. He recalled that when the property was platted
an easement was placed of record for water storage on the entire lot. In July of
1979 a petition was presented to vacate the water storage easement on the high
ground at the rear of the lot to allow construction of a dwelling. Council granted
vacation of that portion of the easement,upon staff recommendation that the area
was not needed for water storage. Subsequently, the property has been sold and
the new owner has requested vacation of the remaining water storage easement over
which the driveway is located because of a concern that the City may at some
future point in time dig up his driveway. Staff would recommend approval of the
easement vacation subject to the following conditions: 1) that the utility ease-
ment be retained on the north side for Northwestern Bell and Northern States
Power Company, and 2) that a drainage easement of 10 foot in width also be: retained.
Mr. Hoffman advised that he has talked to the abutting property owners to the north
and south and they have no objections. Member Richards raised the question that if
the, easement vacation was granted, that at.some future date a petition for subdivi-
sion could be presented. Tom Kelley, stated he was representing the owner Harvey
Golub, and that Mr. Golub had requested the easement vacation so that if he were
to sell the property he could advise the potential buyer that the roadway is free
and clear. Following discussion, Member Schmidt moved that the petition for
vacation of storage:of water.easement of Lot 2, Block 3, Schey's Park View Third
Addition be denied, based on the reason-that the.City has -assured...the::owner:_it_has
no_intent.to dig up the roadway. Motion was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE DISCUSSED; CONCERN OF RESIDENT NOTED. Mr. Rosland referred
to a letter received from E. Dudley Parsons, 4437 Brookside Terrace, in which
several amendments to Ordinance No. 312 (Animal Control) are proposed, following
an incident wherein Mrs. Parsons was severely bitten by a dog. Staff has also
been reviewing the,ordinance and will be recommending changes for consideration
by the Council at a later date. Mr. Parsons was present and explained his reasons
for recommending more strict regulation of dogs. Mr. Rosland suggested that the
changes recommended by Mr. Parsons, together with staff recommendations, be brought
back to the Council at the July 2, 1984 meeting. No formal action was taken.
BID AWARDED FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT. Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for
playground equipment showing Hamele Sales, Inc. at $40,478.00 and Earl F. Anderson
and Associates, Inc. at $44,857.68. Member Schmidt's motion was seconded by
Member Turner for award of bid for playground equipment to low bidder Hamele Sales,
Inc. at $40,478.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
6/4/84
i
BID AWARDED FOR IMPROVEMENTS BA -137, BA -261 AND MISCELLANEOUS PARK WORK (484 -3 ENG).
Mr. Rosland presented tabulation of bids for Improvement No. BA-137 Hansen Road -
Section I -, Improvement No. BA -261 Westridge Court - Section II, Garden Park Improve
ments- Section III, Playground Concrete Rings- Section IV, Arneson Park Curb and
Gutter, Section V as follows:
BIDDER
SECTION
I
SECTION
II
SECTION
III
SECTION
IV
I SECTION
V
TOTAL
Midwest Asphalt Corporation
382,873.O'S
7,935.00
82,912.50
12,144.00
6,146.40
!492,010.99
Bury & Carlson, Inc.
392,765.'29
7,685.50
95,353.00
7,920.00
4,681.90
508,405.69
Matt Bullock Contracting Co.
404,422.,4E
9,335.00
90,181.60
9,900.00
4,662.00
518,501.05
Alexander Construction
421,091.5C
9,575.00
113,953.60
18,480.00
6,492.00
570,042.10
Bituminous Roadways, Inc.
453,648.6C
8,851.25
92,225.50
119880.00
6,598.00
P73,203.35
Hardrives, Inc.
434,216.41
9,090.00
127,907.50
9,966.00
7,016.00
588,195.60
Buesing Bros. Trucking, Inc. 1502,900.'2E
9,726.00
98,949.00
8,646.00
5,310.00
525,531.25
Staff would recommend award of bids for Section I, II and III to the low bidder
and to reject the bids-for Section,IV and V pending review of of the park improve-
ment budget. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member.Turner for award of
bids for Section I, II and II to the recommended low bidder Midwest Asphalt Corpor-
ation at a total of $473,720.59 and to reject the bids for Section IV and V.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
i
BID AWARDED FOR HP 150 /SOFTWARE /PRINTER. Mr. Rosland presented bid for HP 150
Software and Printer for the Police Department from Dodd.Electronics, advising.that
this was the low bid submitted to LOGIS. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by
Member Schmidt for award of bid for HP 150 Software and Printer to recommended
low bidder to LOGIS, Dodd Electronics, at $6,185.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
GARDEN PARK /NSP LAND DONATION APPROVED; SUBJECT TO GRANTING OF EASEMENT. Mr. Rosland
explained that the east boundary of Garden Park encroaches on property owned by
Northern States Power Company on which is .located their high transmission lines.
For years NSP has offered to sell that property to the City and the offer has been
rejected. Now NSP has offered to donate the land to the City, subject to retaining
an easement for maintenance of their utility lines. Staff would recommend approval
of the'land donation inasmuch as park activities are held on their property.
Mr. Rosland pointed out that if Council approves the land transfer, that NSP would
then prepare an agreement,.which would be brought back to Council for approval,
to effect the land donation to the, City. Member Schmidt moved to approve and
accept the donation of land from Northern States Power Company, which is generally
located on the easterly boundary of Garden Park, abutting Hansen Road. Motion was
seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
NINE MILE CREEK AND MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
DISCUSSED. Engineer Hoffman advised that the Metropolitan Council proposed
- legislation during 1981 and 1982 which became law in 1982 regarding surface water
management. Chapter 509 of the 1982 State Statute now requires updating and
further development of existing plans. Staff has been working with both water -
shed districts in developing potential new policy and projects that would involve
watershed participation. Mr. Hoffman referred to a preliminary.draft_by..Minne-
haha.Creek.Watershed District for.stormwater runoff, flood plain, dredging and
soil loss /sedimentation control policies, Nine Mile Creek Watershed projects,
and to a map showing existing DNR!'public waters and wetlands in Edina. He asked
that Council advise staff of any comments regarding surface water management
which they would like to have conveyed to either watershed district as to the
feasibility of providing greater or less watershed district and -City control
over existing ponds and wetlands. No formal action was taken.
EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney advised that the
term of James Van Valkenburg terminates in June, 1984, and recommended that he
be reappointed for a three year term to end in June, 1987. The unexpired term
of Richard Wyatt to June, 1985, will also be open for appointment by the Mayor.
Mayor Courtney asked for recommendations from the Council to fill -Mr. Wyatt's
term so that action could be taken at the June 18, 1984, meeting. Member
Bredesen then moved approval of reappointment of James Van Valkenburg to The
Edina Founation Board for a term 'to June, 1987. Motion was seconded by Member
Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
6/4/84
VACATION OF PORTION OF LINCOLN DRIVE NOTED. Attorney Erickson advised that
the City has closed with Wallace Kenneth regarding the conveyance to the City of
Lots 6 thru 12 and 28 thru 35, Block 1, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition, and that
the proceedings for vacation of a portion of Lincoln Drive can now be completed.
No formal action required.
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ANNUAL MEETING NOTED. Member Turner reminded the
Council that the League of Minnesota Cities Annual Meeting is scheduled for
June 12, 1984, and asked if there are any policy issues on the agenda which may
affect Edina. Mr. Rosland responded that he was not aware of any that would
directly affect the City and that members of the Council would be attending so
they could give input on any.agenda items. He noted that the issue of comparable
worth would be discussed which may impact the City. No formal action was taken.
REPORT TO BE GIVEN ON MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION. In response to inquiry
of Member Turner, Member Richards stated he would bring to thed Council a report
on legislative issues which are being addressed by the Municipal Legislative
Commission. No formal action taken.
APPOINTMENT OF DOTTIE RIETOW TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland
advised that Dottie Rietow, recently appointed to the Metropolitan Council as
recommended by the Edina City Council, had called to update him on recent actions
of the Metropolitan Council. He commented that she will be an excellent repre-
sentative to the Council from this area. No action was taken.
PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONVEYANCE OF WOODDALE SCHOOL SITE TO CITY APPROVED.
Mr. Rosland advised that the revised Purchase Agreement between the City and the
School District for the conveyance of the Wooddale School Site has now been
reviewed by both.-the City Attorney and the School District Attorney with.regard
to changes desired by the School District and is now ready for signature. Member
Turner offered the following.resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and City Manager are
hereby authorized and directed to sign on behalf of the City the Purchase Agreement
between the City and the School District for the Wooddale School Site.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
MINNESOTA CABLESYSTEMS SOUTHWEST NEWSPAPER ARTICLE DISCUSSED. Member Bredesen
referred to an article in the newspaper regarding reported financial difficulties
of Minnesota Cablesystems Southwest and noted there was no mention of charging
for local access. Mr. Rosland advised that the Operating Committee will be
meeting with the company and then would bring recommendations to the Southwest
Cable Commission. Any cable ordinance changes would have to be approved by each
of the five cities who make up the Commission. Member Bredesen stated he would
like to have this matter discussed by the Council in order to be part of -the process
that leads up to recommendations by the Commission. No action was taken.
ANNUAL NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT TOUR NOTED. Mr. Rosland noted that the
Annual Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Tour will be conducted on Tuesday, June 12,
1984, from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. and areas to be reviewed include Bredesen Park, Mount
Normandale Lake and Opus II Development. No action was taken.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF EXPO '85 ADOPTED. Mr. Rosland advised that Expo '85 is
scheduled for April 20 and 21, 1985, and recommended that the Council adopt a
resolution in support of the event. Member Turner stated that it is an important
community event. Member Schmidt then offered the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Edina Expo '85 is scheduled for Saturday, April 20 and Sunday, April 21,
1985, and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this event will be to foster a strong sense of community,
and
WHEREAS, Edina Expo '85 will acquaint the citizens of Edina with the many business
and divic organizations and services available in the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby supports the
concept of Expo '85.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
6/4/84
AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 434 (SWIMMING POOLS) DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland advised that
an amendment to Ordinance No. 434 regulating swimming pools is recommended to address
two issues: 1) deck requirements for special purpose pools (whirlpool /hot tub), and
2) fencing requirements. Member Bredesen raised questions regarding requirements
for a deck for a special purpose pool and location of the pool. After discussion,
Mr. Rosland suggested that staff revise the wording of the amendment to clarify the
meaning of the sections in question and to bring Ordinance No. 434 -A8 back to Council
at a Special Meeting on June 7, 1984, for consideration by the Council. No action
was taken.
LIQUOR FUND REPORTS as of January 31, 1984, February 29, 1984, and March 31, 1984,
were presented, reviewed and ordered placed on file by motion of Member Schmidt,
seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
0
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Schmidt, was seconded by Member Turner for payment,
of the following Claims as per PreiList dated 6/4/84: General Fund $46,454.60,
Park Fund $7,083.62, Art Center $609.13, Swimming Pool Fund $4,556.66, Golf Course
Fund $7,504.24, Recreation Center Fund $13,288.94, Waterwork Fund $12,787.39, Sewer
Rental Fund $3,158.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,050.63, Construction Fund $15,106.19,
Total $111,600.39.
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on!the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 10:12 p.m.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JUNE 7, 1984
The Edina City Council meet in special session at 5:48 p.m., immediately upon
adjournment of the Board of Review. Answering rollcall were Members Richards,
Schmidt, Turner and Courtney.
ORDINANCE NO. 434 -A8 ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED (SWIMMING AND SPECIAL
PURPOSE POOLS). Mr. Rosland advised, that as directed by the Council at its
Regular Meeting of June 4, 1984, the amendment to Ordinance No. 434 has been
clarified and staff would now recommend adoption thereof. He pointed out that
the amendment changed the definitions of "swimming pool" and "special purpose--'
pool "; amended part of Section 6 regarding pool deck requirements and amended
Section 23 with regard to location requirements. No objection being heard,
Member Turner moved adoption of Ordinance No. 434 -A8 with waiver of Second
Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 434 -A8
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 434
TO DEFINE SPECIAL PURPOSE POOLS AND SWIMMING
POOLS, CHANGE DECK AREA REQUIREMENTS, CLARIFY
FENCE REQUIREMENTS AND AMEND LOCATION REQUIREMENTS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINSc
Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance No. 434 is hereby amended by changing the
following definitions:
"Swimming Pool" is any basin for holding water, designed for human use, with
a water surface area exceeding 100 square feet.
"Special Purpose Pool" is any basin for holding water, designed for human use,
100 square feet or less in water surface area. This definition includes, but is
not limited to, treatment pools, therapeutic pools, whirlpools, spa pools, hot
tubs and wading pools.
Sec. 2. Paragraph (g) of Section 6 of Ordinance No. 434 is hereby amended
to read:
"(g) Pool Deck. Unobstructed deck areas not less than 48-inches wide shall
be provided to extend entirely around each swimming pool; however, no deck need
be provided for that side of a swimming pool forming a common wall with a special
purpose pool, where the water depth of both the swimming pool and the special
purpose pool are less than 54 inches, and where the deck extends around all of
those sides of the special purpose pool not sharing a common wall with the swimming
pool. Pool decks shall be constructed above, but not more than 9 inches above,
the normal water line. The deck area shall be constructed of impervious material,
and the surface shall be such as to be smooth and easily cleaned and of non -slip
construction. The deck shall have a pitch of at least o'ne- fourth inch to the
foot, designed so as to prevent back drainage into the pool. If deck drains are
provided, drain pipe line shall be at least two inches in diameter; drain openings
shall have an open area of at least four times the cross - sectional area of the
drain pipe. The deck drain system shall have indirect connections to the sanitary
sewer. The deck drains shall not be connected to the recirculation system piping."
Sec. 3. Section 23 of Ordinance No. 434 is hereby amended to read:
"Sec. 23. Location. No portion of a swimming pool or- appurtenances thereto
shall be located at a distance less than ten feet from any side or rear property
line, nor in front of the building line. No portion of a special purpose pool
or appurtenance thereto shall be located at a distance less than five feet from
any side or rear property line, nor in front of the building line." .
Sec. 4. Section 24 of Ordinance No. 434 is hereby amended to read:
"Sec. 24. Fences. All swimming pools and special purpose pools shall be
completely enclosed by a non - climbing type fence. All fence openings or points
of entry into the pool area enclosure shall be equipped with gates. The fence
and gates shall be at least four feet in height and shall be constructed of a
minimum number eleven gauge woven wire mesh corrosion - resistant material, or of
other materials approved by the Building Inspector. All gates shall be equipped
with self - closing and self - latching devices placed at the top of the gate or
otherwise inaccessible to small children. All fence posts shall be decay or
corrosion - resistant and shall be set in concrete bases, or other suitable
protection. The openings between the bottom of the fence and the ground or other
surface and the openings between the vertical pickets shall not be more than four
inches."
Sec. 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
ATTEST: Mayor
City Clerk
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the
meeting adjourned at 5:50 p.m.
City Clerk
, i °S,
.i..- V C 11
Dear 1'!r • Cour;ney'l
�eCa.Ll7e '! 1rS. i:8 e t 11 r : L'.St tie , O `v 23I t�'0 tlno
iii n I_i: I1S(�.L11-1 O.- v�G' �__- �t -ty OL- !IC�1� -'
O't -,t vend �h J u.
i l•7111 1TJ 1t3 ti 11S 183ver GO 011- :1 - -.E3 Oi11' L'IOLl(�'rlts it.i:ULlt #
pro o ,ed t:rojc'et cr1 pest �_ �•
UU
coop..i^u'ion end th-, e-LLO -1 U3 o.L ?r. _ _!?Cis O.L_ °n �o ...e�? ..
us informed of the'; o5,:LD:L aics.
.'e una.erstarid t'loa onD option he trill ]�r, _gent to t; e
^ounCi1 i s a. decision l_D -to !proceed it all. L_, -L ,-could be our
rst c'aoice au'd ,re'fc_'cnce.
-! i t'lle "OjZi1Cil feels 't in t SOL1e !i! rid of pro j'ect is mandall-oi ,rj
: , , o� o, , ' "oct
ire are prepared to, accept
oadtaa�j� curb to curb, ],!ith 1,o _^ rlring a`l_l_ove on eit_ler
Side. Tile bridge StrtZC Gure � ;OUld be—rider v_l. ^n ri feet )}r
the aiimunt, required for C1 e4;a_Ir. On the north sidev CnCi.
^ossiblf for pedestriOn - viowing S e.ce on 'tile south Iiid,
as' ]aell. : `.CI s odo tr! s�a.cc I Oul(I be on th'e bridge only, ^
='rid would hot - -requ �.re 0r "' i ��Vly a. sideldaJ 1, On L;le SOUtIi 6iC•e OS
4.4'"a Street. The. l: °Orh 'roul be done lrlU pro per COriCer? 'Or
preservation o:i' e:�isping trees to the e: went possi :l't and
r ,.
S;)eClfiCclly .�O,r the rOGI O]' e.L:a trees on the north Slae Of
file str °eta c211d for landscape trees On file 5011't l side
including a gingko and a. cherry on our om property.
jIuly larger proposal. than this, involtTirg a Crider roadway.
I lan 2; eett j•re irould view as e:.cessive end not in the best
interest of us nor of the neighborhood. i.e would oppose
any such option as vigo— .Ously as ire. could.
'lea reciato i;he cilar_ce.-to speak to �oU ^ln open forumq Vnd
1 the
. atirai� u decisioa o:, -�.ze council �)ith interes t.
SincerelYt
T `'1 � 5101 ` ? til reeti ',dina.�
4412 "Trines ;'IV3. 30.
-lira, _ __? 5J424
June 15, 1984
4ina City Council
73ina, TUI
Tear Council ':embers ,
?de � -rish to express our opposition to any alteration of the
,,ridth of 44th Street from its pressnt dimensions. The bridge
over "innehaha Creek is perfectly adequate.
It strikes us that if 44th Street is not wide enough to carry
?'!TA buses, the buses could be directed down °-7ooddale Avenue to
50th Street. As we recall, buses were petitioned. off '•Tooddale
by th3 residents at the time the bus route was established. Up-
grading 44th Street to accommodate buses seems unfair to resi-
dents of the 44th Street area.
If the ;n;insering Department is seeking worthwhile projects,
it should address the condition of France Avenue, which has
been deplorable for many years.
Yoursuly,
r
David and Adele Hersey
i..
cc: Jim -,Telna
to
s
�i''1;01 S'I11; 1 1. 1 18
�6►�� Is 11, (M(I.A,(I�A�f,�
• Nl Nl
Is I !1
�� t
AVERAGE CURRENT WIDTH IN FEET OF WEST L14TH STREET
do
ON A MOCK BY MOCK BASIS
. 'nffOQlj'1
"94,
LE
JK
0.
'a
BA i
1 1--'. N PA
I WO
fill
I
t l I f
F'I'
ACT
ANTicipm- MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION OF
ROADWAY IN 1939 OR AFTFR UWP$6
FFTITIMP FAO AY K41PFNT5 IQURRFNT� Y4
WT IN 5 WAR WQNqTRWPTIPN PW
gpli
A
BIg I
VVYL
je-
ii-7
Jk
71
AD
IS MR
ANTIPIPATP M-AR PIPPHURPICTIPH PF
RPAPWAY MU PPPPP, Affr�, yW� ,
WIDTH: 36 FAT WIDE (STANDARD USED BY CITY)
PARKING: PARKING ALLM SOUTH SIDE
RMING: GAS TAX FUMING WITH STNI M ASSESShET
TO ADJACMT PROPMN MERS
VI "I", 1.1111dila-
WIDTH: 32 FEET 111 DE
PARKING: NO PARKING ALLMD
RIVING: GAS TAX FUNDING WITH STANDARD ASSESSMIT
ALTEANATIVE III
WIDTH: 28 FEET WIDE (SuBjECT TO STATE Am AmwAL oN TRAFFIC)
PARKING: NO PARKING ALLO10
FUVING: GAS TAX FUMING WITH STX= ASSESSPUff
ALTERNATIVE IV
NO BUILD
RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
S.A.P. 120 - 140 -01 (WEST 44TH STREET) FROM BROOKSIDE TERRACE TO T.H. 100
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of MSAS 140 (West 44th
Street) from Brookside Terrace to T.H. 100, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the
improvement of the street, and
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both
sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State
Aid project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be necessary prerequisite
to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the
City of Edina has been determined;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City of Edina shall ban the
parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 140 (West 44th Street) at all
times.
ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1984.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 18, 1984, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regulat Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 15th day of May, 1985.
City Clerk
do
AN APPEAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA
June 18, 1984
Because we are opposed to subdivision in Indian Hills and
cannot attend the June 18th meeting, we make you this
written appeal.
The Gustafsons have been citing the Muriel Peterson replat
as a precedent for subdividing the Herring lot. This is
wrong. Doctors Adeline and David Kiang of 6700 Indian
Hills Road have pointed out that the actual precedent was
set in 1979 by the Moore case which involved their property.
Pat Moore of 6704 Indian Hills Road wished to sell part of
his platted lot. The portion he wished to sell exceeded
the requirement of Edina zoning ordinance No. 811. Neverthe-
less his petition was rejected.
The Peterson lot was subdivided to permit a widow who had
lived in Indian Hills for a great many years to remain on
her property in what has been called a "mother -in -law
cottage ". At that time we called the planning commission
to ask if such a cottage could be built on the lot without
subdividing it. We were told that it was not possible. A
petition was circulated by Mrs. Peterson and her sons
requesting subdivision. We did not sign it but because
we sympathized with her we did not try to stop it which was
a mistake.
A great deal of emotion was engendered by the situation.
You experienced some of it in the council chamber, so you
can well understand the dilemma and reaction of neighbors
who found it impossible not to sign the request of a
grieving woman who was asking them to help her to continue
to live among them. This has proved to be a mistake on
everyone's part, the Petersons, the neighbors and the
Council's but two wrongs do not make a right and it should
not be perpetuated.
The Peterson subdivision should be considered only as an
exception that was made solely on the basis of compassion.
The Gustafson request, however, parallels that made by
Pat Moore in that it is concerned solely with personal
gain(as was Pat Moore's) and both at the expense of the
residents. There can be no comparison with the Peterson
case.
The Gustafson petition parallels that of Pat Moore in
other ways also as shown by reasozis that were given by
the Council for refusing Mr. Moore's request.
F.
,r .
The proposed subdivision was smaller than other lots in
the vicinity and would therefore be detrimental to the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood.
The subject property approximated the average lot size in
the area and should be maintained as it was platted.
The property owners in the vicinity should have the right
to rely on the filed lot.
The orientation of the new dwelling would have a detrimen-
tal affect on Dr. Kian 's residence.
Tha approval might encourage petitions for replatting
that would adversely alter the character and symmetry of
the neighborhood.
There are other reasons against the Gustafson petition.
We have been told that they have a great deal of power in
the community. This may or may not be true. There are
different kinds of power. The first time the Indian Hills
group appeared before you to express their opposition to
this proposed subdivision, the Gustafsons told us they be-
lieved the residents did not understand the situation --
that if they were not granted their petition to build more
than one house, they would tear down the existing home and
would then build a very big structure that would be even
more objectionable to the residents, especially to,those
who lived across from it, for it would block their view
to an even greater extent. We feel this attitude is
disruptive, hostile, and threatening. We object to this
kind of power.
They have said they want to be treated fairly. We do also.
They discuss the number of houses they would like to build,
the very high price tag those houses would carry, the foot-
age for set -backs waterline etc. This talk obscures the
real issue. The real issue before the Council is not the
number of houses it is possible to crowd on a lot. It is
not even the expectation of a builder that he deserves a
gift of as many free lots as he can get. The real issue
before the council is that subdivision, whether it is
feasible or not as in the Moore case, is very objectionable
to the majority of residents. This is an established
neighborhood. We feel that it is fair that we should have
the security of knowing that our area will continue in
density as it was platted - that the Council's decision
concerning the Moore petition that we have - "the right to
rely on the filed plat" will apply in this instance as
well.
Furthermore, we feel that it is not fair that we be sub -
jected to the noise, confusion, inconvenience and general
nuisance that is alleged was associated with building
activity as it was handled by the Gustafsons on
Cheyenne Trail since April, 1983. The street was cluttered
with cars, trucks, and all kinds of heavy equipment. The
noise level was increased accordingly. This is not an ex -
perience we should expect or condone. In an established
neighborhood, the enjoyment of the area has a very high
priority.
We feel that anything but a negative response to a request
that is clearly so upsetting to so many homeowners on the
grounds of fairness, would make a mockery of the meaning
of the word.
Incorporated in the minutes of the 3 -5 -'79 meeting is this
account of the cohesiveness of the residents of the area
and their consideration for each other. "Mrs. Marilyn
Haugen, 6612 Indian Hills Road recalled that at the time
the Ratelles wanted their lot divided at 6716 Arrowhead
Pass, the neighbors objected and the Ratelles dropped their
request."
We note also in the minutes of the '79 meeting that "Edina
Council Members A.Charles Bredesen,III, C.Wayne Courtney,
Frederick S.Richards and June A Schmidt personally inspect-
ed the Subject Property and surrounding neighborhood ".
Even though you may have checked for set -backs etc. now
that the foliage has filled out,we hope you will drive
through the area. We are confident that no one can do so
without realizing why it is so important to us to
keep it just as it is.
We were grateful for the views you expressed when you
rejected the Pat Moore petition. We feel even more strongly
today that there should be no more houses than there are
presently platted lots and we respectfully ask that you
show us the same sensitivity and understanding by reject-
ing the current proposal, thus assuring us that no one
should have the right to tamper with the security and
the serenity of our lives.
We appreciate you help and protection in the past and
respectfully ask for it again at this present moment.
1
:Z7` ,
Do you live in Indian Hills because it is beautiful?
Do you like the trees, the rolling terrain, the seclusion
of the large lots - and all so close to the heart of the
city?
When you tell people that you live in Indian Hills, do
they say "Oh, that's a lovely place. I've driven through
it." and there is - well, not envy but something close to
it in their voices - something that tells you what you
already know - that you are a very lucky person to live
in such a beautiful place. This is not surprising for the
area was planned to be one of "distinction" by Hal Burton
of Edina.
Do you want to lose this?
It is possible. The Edina
on the "wedge" of change.
subdivision will be on May
they vote for the division
be the beginning of the ens
dear to us.
City Council is now deciding
The final vote on the Gustafson
21, at City Hall at 7P.M. If
of the lot as proposed, it will
3 for a way of life that is very
Do you want to let this happen?
Will you be sorry if you do nothing to prevent it from
occurring?
Or - will you go to the meeting and let the Council know
by your presence that you do not want this. The Council
is there to protect us but we can't expect it to protect
us if we don "t ask it to do so.
When we built or bought
would be no more houses
Now, if these lots are
houses and Indian Hills
Our way of life will be
oblivion.
our homes, we believed that there
than there were existing lots.
shopped up, there will be many more
will be just another subdivision.
gone, bulldozed and battered into
If you really care about Indian Hills, if you truly want
to preserve the beauty and serenity of this unique area,
go to the meeting and let the Council know how you feel
May 21 - -- City Hall - -- 7P.M.
5A -I
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 18, 1984
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
City Council Members
FROM: Thomas S. Erickson, City Attorney
SUBJECT: Gustafson Replat /Lot 5, Block 1,' Indian Hills
Attached is a letter dated and received June 14, from Jeffrey Gustafson
withdrawing the above replat. Also in your packet is the proposed Findings,
Decision and Reasons related to the proposed plat. Although withdrawing
the proposed plat may result in the lack of a subject on which the Council
can act, because the hearing has been scheduled and all testimony will have
been received, I know of no reason why the Council should not act if it wishes
to do so; action by the Council should not be harmful to the City's position.
TSE /Ide
U
lei
- � - LT
f2
Grp- / y /9�5<
� X �f�
� �'� ,
��
�s� o ���� ,��� ,�, �� �
� ���
��
. � � , }GLC�i�
' i
��� � �� ��
CITY OF EDINA
In the Matter of the Application of FINDINGS,
JEFFREY GUSTAFSON for a Subdivision of DECISIONS,
Land Entitled GUSTAFSON REPLAT OF LOT 5, AND
BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS (S -84 -3) REASONS
The above entitled matter was heard before the City
Council, City of Edina, on May 7, 1984,, May 21, 1984, and June
18, 1984. Jeffrey Gustafson ( "Proponent ") was present. Gregory
Gustafson, attorney for the Proponent, was present at all
hearings. The City Council, having heard and reviewed all of the
facts and arguments presented by the Proponent, his repre-
sentative, City staff, and property owners in the vicinity of the
subject subdivision and their representatives, and having heard
and reviewed the evidence and law adduced by the Proponent, his
representatives, City staff, and property owners and their
representatives, and being fully advised, after due consi-
deration, hereby makes the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The Proponent, on February 17, 1984, submitted an
application for subdivision of a 141,700 square foot parcel of
land located west of Indian Hills Road and east of Mohawk Trail
extended. This tract of land (the "Subject Property ") is a
platted lot, described as Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills, which was
platted in 1948. An existing single dwelling unit building is
located in the north central portion of the Subject Property.
The Subject Property adjoins and extends into Arrowhead Lake.
According to City records, the Subject Property is owned by
Howard Bergerud.
2. The subdivision, as submitted with the application
for subdivision on February 17, 1984, delineated three, R -1,
I
single dwelling unit lots. On February 22, 1984, prior to any
official consideration of the proposal, the Proponent submitted a
modified subdivision (the "Proposed Subdivision) delineating only
two R -1 lots. Lot 1 of the Proposed Subdivision measured 91,600
square feet and Lot 2 measured 50,100 square feet. These
measurements included portions of the Subject Property located
within Arrowhead Lake. The Proponent 'indicated that if the
Proposed Subdivision were approved, the existing dwelling located
on the Subject Property would be demolished and two new dwellings
would be constructed.
3. The Edina Community Development and Planning
Commission (the "Commission ") reviewed the Proposed Subdivision
at its February 29, 1984, meeting. Several property owners
residing in the vicinity of the Subject Property were present and
spoke in opposition to the Proposed Subdivision'citing issues
concerning density, terrain, decreased property values, neighbor-
hood stability and conformance with the City of Edina
Comprehensive Plan. The Proponent's representative described the
Proposed Subdivision and requested approval noting that a similar
subdivision had recently been approved for the adjoining lot to
the south. The Commission recommended denial of the Proposed
Subdivision.
4. On March 23, 1984, the Proponent submitted a plan
showing a relocation of the common lot line between Lots 1 and 2
of the Proposed Subdivision. The effect of the relocation was to
increase the area of Lot 2 from 50,100 square feet to 67,700
square feet and decrease the area of Lot 1 from .91,600 square
feet to 74,000 square feet.
5. On May 7, 1984, the Edina City Council conducted a
public hearing and received the report and recommendation of the
Commission regarding the Proposed Subdivision. The Council also
reviewed the revised Proposed Subdivision as submitted on March
23, 1984. Pursuant to applicable ordinances, notice of the May
7th, meeting was given by mailed notice to owners of property
within 200 feet of the Subject Property. At said hearing,
surrounding property owners and their representatives testified
in opposition to the Proposed Subdivision. Among the issues
submitted in their testimony were:
A. the character and symmetry of the neighborhood would
be adversely impacted;
B. the need for the consistency of decision making,
recognizing early intentions of the original plats, and
guidelines for evaluating subdivisions;
C. the need for positive support from adjoining
landowners for subdivisions;
D. the steep terrain of the Subject Property limits the
potential for subdivision;
E. an undesirable precedent would be established which
would lead to other subdivisions; and
F. protective covenants are in existence through 1988
which restrict the subdivision of lots in Indian Hills.
The Proponent testified in support of the Proposed
Subdivision noting that the proposed lots are very large and the
distance between the proposed dwellings would be 100 feet,
thereby preserving the spaciousness of the neighborhood. The
Proponent also noted that the City' recently approved a
subdivision of the adjoining lot (Lot 3, Block 1, Indian Hills)
which was very similar to the Proposed Subdivision as to size,
shape and location. The Proponent opined that it would be unfair
to now deny the Proposed Subdivision. The City Council,
thereupon, continued the hearing to May 21, 1984, and, requested
City staff to analyze existing lot sizes in the vicinity of the
Subject Property, review setbacks of existing dwellings from
Arrowhead Lake, and clarify the reasons cited by the Commission
in recommending denial. The Council also noted that areas
located within the bed of Arrowhead Lake should be excluded from
lot size computations as such areas do not contribute to the
perceived size of the lot.
6. On May 21, 1984, the City Council again conducted a
public hearing concerning the Proposed Subdivision. City staff
reported that an analysis of lot sizes in the area had been
undertaken and presented the results of that analysis to the City
Council.
An updated survey of the Subject Property was also
presented by the Proponent that verified the area of the lots in
the Proposed Subdivision exclusive of areas within Arrowhead
Lake. Said survey also verified the location of the shoreline of
Arrowhead Lake as it related to the Subject Property. City staff
also presented exhibits showing the approximate setback of other
existing dwellings from Arrowhead Lake. A summary of the reasons
cited by the Commission in recommending 'denial of the Proposed
Subdivison was also given. Several surrounding property owners
appeared at the hearing and again testified in opposition to the
Proposed Subdivision. Two individuals appeared and testified in
support of the Proposed Subdivision. The Proponent appeared and
testified in support of the Proposed Subdivision noting that the
proposed lots were comparable in size to other lots in the area,
the proposed lots were buildable, adequate setbacks from
Arrowhead Lake would be provided, and that the City should treat
this case in a fair and equal way consistent with the recently
approved subdivision of the adjoining lot.
The City Council also reviewed the effect of the grant of
a conservation restriction or perpetual easement covering a 100
foot wide strip of land adjoining Arrowhead Lake as required by
Edina Ordinance No. 801, the Platting Ordinance.
7. The area of Lot 1 of the revised Proposed Subdivision
as determined by the Proponent's surveyor is 38,700 square feet
and the area of Lot 2 is 34,500 square feet excluding that
portion of the proposed lots located within the bed of Arrowhead
Lake, as determined by the Proponent's surveyor.
8. Edina Ordinance No. 825, the "Zoning Ordinance"
imposes the following minimum standards for single dwelling unit
lots:
Minimum Lot Area -
Minimum Lot Width -
Minimum Lot Depth -
9',000 square feet
75 feet
120 feet
The dimensions and areas of Lots 1 and 2 of the revised
Proposed Subdivision comply with the above standards.
The Zoning Ordinance defines "lot area" as follows:
"The area within the lot lines exclusive of land located
below the ordinary high water elevation of lakes, ponds
and streams."
9. Within a 1,000 foot radius of the Subject Property,
the average area of existing platted lots is approximately 40,500
square feet and the median area is approximately 34,500 square
feet. The average area of existing platted lots adjoining
Arrowhead Lake is approximately 42,000 square feet and the median
area is approximately 32,000 square feet. These measurements
exclude portions of lots located within the bed of Arrowhead
Lake.
10. Edina Ordinance No. 801, the "Platting Ordinance"
provides:
"Where any plat, replat or subdivision of land adjoins a
natural lake, pond or stream, including streams which
flow. only intermittently, a strip of land running along
all sides thereof which are contiguous to such lake, pond
or stream, which strip shall extend from a line 100 feet
upland from the lake or pond, as measured from the high
water mark, and 100 feet from the centerline of the
stream, and to and including the bed and water body of
such lake, pond, or stream, shall be either (i) dedicated
to the City for public use, or (ii) subjected to a
perpetual easement in favor of the City over and in said
land and the bed and water body of such lake, pond or
stream for the purpose of protecting the hydraulic
efficiency and the natural character and beauty of such
lake, pond or stream."
Arrowhead Lake is a natural lake within the meaning of
the foregoing Ordinance.
The City has accepted grants of Conservation Restrictions
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 84.64, in lieu of a
perpetual easement as required by the Platting Ordinance. The
construction of improvements within areas subject to a
Conservation Restriction is prohibited.
11. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
( "D.N.R. ") conducted an Ordinary High Water Level investigation.
for Arrowhead Lake on June 1, 1984. The purpose of this
investigation was to determine the ordinary high water mark of
the lake as referred to in the Platting Ordinance and to
determine if a small inlet which adjoins the Subject Property on
the south is part of Arrowhead Lake or if it is a separate and
distinct water body. Based upon its investigation, the D.N.R.
estimated the Ordinary High Water Level of Arrowhead Lake to be
875.8 Mean Sea Level (M.S.L.) and determined that, based upon
this elevation, the small inlet was part of Arrowhead Lake and
not a separate and distinct water body.
12. The present elevation of Arrowhead Lake as
determined by the Proponent's surveyor is 873 M.S.L.
13. The Zoning Ordinance requires that the front street
setback for new buildings must be consistent with the established
average setback observed by existing buildings in the area. City
staff has determined that the required front street setback for
new buidings constructed on Lots 1 and 2 of the Proposed
Subdivision is 82 feet.
14. If a Conservation Restriction were granted to the
City as required by the Platting Ordinance and if the required
front street setback of 82 feet and a required side yard setback
of 10 feet were provided, the buildable area of Lot 2 of the
Proposed Subdivision would be approximately 675 square feet. The
dimensions of this buildable area are approximately 13 feet by 50.
feet.
15. Lot 3, Block 1, Indian Fills adjoins the Subject
Property to the southwest. A subdivision of this property
entitled Indian Hills Peterson Addition (the "Peterson Addition ")
was approved by the City Council on February 6, 1984. According
to the Proponent's surveyor, the Peterson Addition created two
lots measuring 45,800 square feet and 22,200 square feet in area.
The larger lot was retained for an existing dwelling on the
property and the smaller lot was intended for a new homesite.
The topography of the new homesite is nearly level. The existing
dwelling on the larger lot was constructed prior to,.the provision
of the Platting Ordinance requiring the dedication of a 100 foot
strip of land adjoining the lake and, therefore, this dwelling is
located within the area normally subject to a Conservation
Restriction or perpetual easement. City Staff has determined
that the buildable area of the new lot in Peterson Addition is
approximately 4,600 square feet based upon a required front
street setback of 65 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet and a
100 foot wide Conservation Restriction adjoining the lake. The
dimensions of this buildable area are approximately 58 feet by 75
feet. -
16. On March 5, 1979, the City Council denied a proposed
two lot subdivision of Lot 2, McCauley Heights First Addition
which is located in the southeast quadrant of Indian Hills Road
and Arrowhead Pass. This lot is located approximately 1,000 feet.
westerly of the Subject Property and measures approximately
54,500 square feet in area. On May 16, 1977, the City Council
denied a proposed two -lot subdivision of ,Lot 2, Block 1, McCauley
Heights 4th Addition which is located east of McCauley Trail and
south of McCauley Circle and adjoins Arrowhead Lake. This
property measured approximately 37,000 square feet in area.
17. The Platting Ordinance states that the City Council,
in approving plats shall consider, among other things, the
suitability of plats from the standpoint of community planning.
18. The Edina Comprehesive Plan adopted by the City
Council on December 12, 1981, states the following general
policies:
Allow further subdivision of developed single family lots
only if neighborhood character and symmetry are
preserved.
Require increased minimum lot sizes for single family and
two family dwelling lots on steep slopes.
Require the dedication of or the grant of a scenic and
open space easement over all land adjacent to an 100 feet
upland of naturally occuring lakes and ponds in
conjunction with the subdivision or development of
property.
19. The Comprehensive Plan states the following policies
concerning subdivisions in southwest ;Edina where the Subject
Property is located:
Require that all subdivisions of larger developed lots
maintain a desirable spacing of dwellings to ensure the
symmetry and character of the area.
Utilize topography and vegetation characteristics as a
basis for determining suitable lot sizes.
20. The Zoning Ordinance provides for variances from the
requirements of the Ordinance, but only upon finding, among other
required findings, that the "plight of the petitioner is due to
circumstances unique to his property which were not created by
the petitioner."
21. Lot 2 of the Proposed Subdivision exhibits slopes
exceeding 25 %.
22. Prior to the public hearing on June 18, 1984, all
members of the City Council individually inspected the Subject
Property and surrounding neighborhood.
23. Proponent, at the Council meeting of May 7 and May
21, 1984, agreed to such extensions of time as may be necessary
for Council to act on the Proposed Subdivision.
THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing findings, the City
Council does hereby make the following:
Decision:
The application for the Proposed Subdivision entitled
Gustafson Replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills is hereby
denied.
The above decision is made for the following:
A. The Proposed Subdivision is contrary to the policies
of the Comprehensive Plan concerning the further subdivision of
large, developed lots. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan
can, even must, be considered in deciding whether or not to
approve subdivisions.
B. Property owners in the vicinity of the Subject
Property should have the right to rely upon the filed plat
entitled Indian Hills and should rightly presume that any
modification or replatting of said plat will be suitable and
compatible with surrounding properties and that the spaciousness
and character of the Indian Hills area will be preserved.
C. The small inlet adjoining the southerly portion of
the Subject Property is part of Arrowhead Lake. The grant of a
Conservation Restriction over that portion of the Subject
Property adjacent to and 100 feet upland from the entire
shoreline of Arrowhead Lake should be required if the Subject
Property is subdivided. The grant of such a Conservation
Restriction is required by the Platting Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan.
D. Lot 2 of the Proposed Subdivision would contain a
buildable area of only approximately 675 square, with dimensions
of approximately 13 feet by 50 feet, due to the required front
street setback required side yard setback and the location of the
required Conservation Restriction. This buildable area is not
large enough to accommodate a new single dwelling unit building
without the grant of substantial variances from setback
requirements or permission to encroach into the Conservation
Restriction area. The need for variances is created only by
Petitioner's own request for approval of the Proposed
Subdivision, and therefore, does not meet the criteria
established by the Zoning Ordinance for the granting of
variances; but approval of the proposed Subdivision would be
implied approval of the variances.
E. Although the lots in the Proposed Subdivision are
similar in area to some lots in the vicinity, other factors,
including setback requirements, the requirement for a Conser-
vation Restriction, and the presence of steep slopes, impose
severe limitations to the development of Lot 2 of the Proposed
Subdivision which thereby make the construction of a dwelling on
this lot unfeasible without the grant of variances, which
variances would adversely impact the character and symmetry of
the neighborhood.
F. The Subject Property is not unusually or uncharacter-
istically large compared to other lots in the vicinity. Within a
1,000 foot radius of the Subject Property, over one -third of the
lots inventoried exceed one acre in area and several exceed one
and one -half acres. The spaciousness afforded by the Subject
Property adds more than an insignificant value to its use as one
homesite, for which use it is now, and can be, used.
G. Therefore, approval of the Proposed Subdivision could
establish a precedent encouraging the replatting of lots with
similar facts and circumstances which would adversely alter the
character and symmetry of the neighborhood contrary to the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
H. Some of the facts associated with the Subject
Property are shared by Peterson Addition to the south. In
retrospect, these facts perhaps should have led to a denial of
the Peterson Addition. However, the Peterson Addition differed
from the Proposed Subdivision in two significant ways. First, an
adequate and feasible building site existed on the new lot in the
Peterson Addition without the apparent need for encroachments
into the required front street setback or the area normally
subject to a Conservation Restriction. Second, the new homesite
was characterized by level topography. Even if a denial of the
Peterson Addition would have been appropriate, failure to so deny
should not now require the City to approve the Proposed
Subdivision which conflicts with the Comprehensive 'Plan and City
Ordinances.
- 3
,�
i 4 3
NUMBER B -84 -13 Carol and Robert Bossman
L O C A T 10 N 4609 Moorland Avenue
Lot 5, Block 11, Country Club District, Brown Sect.
REQUEST 1.7 percent lot coverage variance
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
B -84 -13 Carol and Robert Bossman, 4609 Moorland Avenue
Lot 5, Block 11, Country Club District, Brown Section
P.I.N. 18- 028 -24 -24 -0033
h'
Request: 1.7 percent lot coverage variance
Mr. Hughes stated that Mr. and Mrs. Bossman propose to remove the attached po:
and two -car garage in the rear of the dwelling and construct a substantial
addition. The addition will contain a family room and attached two -car garagt
on the lower level and a master bedroom suite and deck on the second level.
existing dwelling has approximately 2,000 square feet of living area not
including the basement and the addition will contain approximately 1,800 squat
feet of living space.
The subject lot has an area of 9,950 square feet with a permitted lot coveragc
of 25 percent or 2,488 square feet. The existing structure covers an area of
1,709 square feet or 17.2 percent of the lot. The addition (including the
garage) covers 947 square feet additional area for a total coverage of 2,656
square feet or 26.7 percent. A 1.7 percent lot coverage variance is requester
to permit 168 square feet of additional coverage.
Mr. Hughes added that the proponent submitted a petition from several
surrounding property owners that do not object to the variance. The proposed
lot coverage was reduced in response to the Staff's suggestion. The proponent
does not feel the master bedroom or garage can be reduced any further.
The Board may recall several lot coverage variances in the Country Club
District. However, these are in the Fairway Section with 50 to 60 foot wide
non - conforming lots. The new Zoning Ordinance was designed to eliminate most
the variances on substandard lots.
Mr. Hughes praised the proponent for an excellent job designing the addition,
however, this does not justify a variance. The Ordinance requires an undue
harship for the issuance of a variance. The size of the existing dwelling and
the size of the addition suggest that a hardship is not present here. In
addition, the Staff is not aware of similar conditions in the immediate
vicinity. The plans can be made to conform to lot coverage by the elimination
of an 8 by 21 foot portion of the building. He suggested, that perhaps a porti
of this could come from the open area and second floor balcony.
Mr. Bossman explained that he had been working on the proposed addition for th
last four years. The alternative of reducing the garage area would be
inadequate. To decrease the lot coverage requested would deteriorate the oute
costmetics of the dwelling.
4
r'
Mrs. Judy Colby, 4607 Moorland, spoke in favor of the Bossman's larger garage
alivate the need for a shed. Mr. Beach, 4508 Moorland Avenue, also recommend
approval of the variance request.
Mr. Palmer and Mrs. Utne were in agreement with Staff.
Mr. Bossman argued that the hardship was the size of the dwelling having been
built on a 1930 lot which was definitely smaller. He reminded that Board of
importance that the neighbors were all consenting. They would be the ones to
live with the variance.
Mr. Hughes commented that the 25% lot coverage allowance was made to fit the
size not the dwelling size. He emphasized that extensive consideration had bf
given to lot coverage allowance when recently revising the Zoning Ordinance ar
believed these guidelines should be followed. He pointed out that a new
neighbor may not be as consenting. Mrs. Utne noted that a variance is
considered for the property; not for the people
Mrs. Utne wondered about the possibility of eliminating the 2nd floor balcony
suggested by Staff. Mr. Bossman did not wish to eliminate the balcony.
Mr. Palmer moved for denial of the lot coverage variance and Mrs. Utne secondE
the motion. All were in favor, the motion carried.
STAFF REPORT
MAY 3, 1984
B -84-13 Carol and Robert Bossman, 4609 Moorland Avenue
Lot 5, Block 11,,Country Club District, Brown Section
P.I:N. 18- 028 -24-24 -0033
Refer to: Attached Petition for Variance, statement from the neighborhors and
enclosed building, plans
Request: 1.7 percent lot coverage variance
Mr. and Mrs. Bossman propose.to remove the attached porch and two -car garage in
the rear of the dwellingand construct a substantial addition. The addition
will contain a-family room and attached two -car garage on the lower level and a
master bedroom suite and deck on the second level. The existing dwelling has
approximately 2,000 square feet of living area not including the basement and
the addition will contain approximately 1,800 square feet of living space.
The subject lot has an area of 9,950 square feet with a permitted lot coverage
of 25 percent or 2,488 square feet. The existing structure covers an area of
1,709 square feet or 17.2 percent of the lot. The addition (including the .
garage) covers 947 square feet additional area for a total coverage of 2,656
square feet or 26.7 percent. A 1.7 percent lot coverage variance is requested
to permit 168 square feet of additional coverage.
The subject dwelling is located within the Country Club District which is listed
in the National Register of Historic Places. The dwelling was constructed in
1930 in the Mediterranean Revival style. The proposed addition has been
carefully designed to match the style and materials of the dwelling.
The neighborhood contains many similar conforming lots with dwellings of similar
size and age. The two dwellings south of the site were constructed on the three
lots:divided to create two building sites. The Building fileg do'not contain
many surveys in this area due to the age. The information available indicates
there are no lot coverage variances or non - conformities in the vicinity. (4612
Moorland, 16.7 percent; 4611 Moorland, 13.2 percent and 4606 Moorland, 24
percent due to an addition constructed in 1979). The proponent submitted a
petition from several surrounding propety owners that do not object to the
variance.
The Board may recall several lot coverage variances in the Country Club
District. However, these are in the.Fairway Section with 50 to 60 foot wide
non - conforming lots. The new Zoning Ordinance was.designed to eliminate most of
the variances on substandard lots.
The proposed lot coverage was reduced in response to the Staff's suggestion.
The proponent does not feel the master bedroom or garage can be reduced any
further.
I
Recommendation
The proponent has done an excellent job designing the addition, however, this
does not justify a variance. The Ordinance requires an undue harship'for the
issuance of a.variarice. The-size of the existing dwelling and the size of the
addition suggest that a hardship is not present.,-here._ Ih.addition, the Staff is
riot aware of, similar conditions in the immediate vicinity. The plans can be
made to conform to lot coverage by the elimination of an 8 by 21 foot portion of
the building. Perhaps a portion of this could come from the open area and'
second floor balcony
p y en i ication o.
r
Legal Description: Lot 5 block 11 Country Club District Brown-Section
Street Address: 4609 Moorland Ave
PETITION FOR VARIANCE
of the total
r
lot area. All other requirements will be met
Case Number 1- FLl -/3
�.
,,
-Date 4/18
affirmatively.
The proposed variance will: (if yes, please explain. Use additional sheets
Fee Paid_
Applicant
Carol V. and Robert M. Bossman
925 -4672
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a Yes
No
Phone
i
- Address
4609 Moorland Ave. Edina, MN
ZIP 55424
Status of
Applicant (owner, buyer, agent, etc.): owner
vicinity or zoning district.
Pro ert
Id t'f' N 18- 028 -24 -24 -0033
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
p y en i ication o.
r
Legal Description: Lot 5 block 11 Country Club District Brown-Section
d) Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning
district. X
This is our last home and as such we would like to expand it
to meet our present ana future -
See attaced sheet.
Signature of X6Dli6ant
* Please furnish 6 (six) copies of all plans.
* Applications are accepted on a "first come" basis with a limit of 5 (five)
requests per agenda.
Street Address: 4609 Moorland Ave
We request that our proposed addition be allowed to cover 26.5 - 27%
of the total
Request:
lot area. All other requirements will be met
Minnesota
statutes and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions
must be
satisfied
affirmatively.
The proposed variance will: (if yes, please explain. Use additional sheets
if neces-
sary.)
a)
Relieve an undue hardship which was not self - imposed or a Yes
No
mere convenience.
X
b)
Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this
property, but not applicable to other property in the
vicinity or zoning district.
X
c).
Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other
X
property in the vicinity and zoning district.
d) Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning
district. X
This is our last home and as such we would like to expand it
to meet our present ana future -
See attaced sheet.
Signature of X6Dli6ant
* Please furnish 6 (six) copies of all plans.
* Applications are accepted on a "first come" basis with a limit of 5 (five)
requests per agenda.
We have closely looked at passageways, furniture placement and exterior
aesthetics and have tried to keep each room and the total addition as small
as possible. We have added considerable expense ( the tile roof and the
window treatment ) to ensure that the house is an asset to the neighborhood.
We feel that the 160 -170 square feet of excess size adds to the public
welfare as an alternative to removing most of this area from the garage.
If we decrease the size of the garage we would end up with a substandard
garage for the size of the house. Our direct neighbors to the north ( the
Colbys) would actually like us to expand the size of the garage to ensure
that there would be sufficent storage space so that both cars are put in
the garage at all times.
We feel very strongly about this request and hope that you will act on it
favorably.
RE: Request for Variance
ROBERT M. BOSSMAN RESIDENCE
4609 Moorland Ave. Edina, MN
We the undersighned have seen the plans for the proposed addition to the
Robert M. Bossman residence at 4609 Moorland Ave.
We have reviewed the plans and realize that they are requesting a variance
to allow them to build on approximately 26'% of the lot. This is 1�% over
the 25% allowed. We have no objections to this request for a variance.
NAME ADDRESS
3 l
11
I
I
1
1
1
t11
O
OO
s
t
s I
1
1
1
j
I
129,00 - --
0
C,
1
1
lC
1
� 1
.1 1
1
I
�i
ITI
V.: lnryYi J•'4
14�
LIE
7f,
IT.
�! A •, It
mY. P
ic- .4
7 .1
, f
X-r.-
tl
"i A�l
/I I I_I I � 'i`.1.f- .Il.i j r.r I-i'� � -j � 1. �.I I I 111 I �•�r�;l.� ,
f_I�.ING. LIVE J -
f trr
.. cOU...Ib 1__I._ys �' — ..,f r J �,: ^r ��i r _ f t�_ y �t *. �. q.' � ��f r� d...�yv .f 'b ✓�1i.�4��,.t 1
1 ) .I. 1 1 h �. ! r f ZF' �• ! •r. is c_
FM
oolwl�
TTI [El
----------
rr
�'1 �� I 1, 4•r.j �,tr -4� y`'f S IV 1 r+ W4
J i c 7 I ' T if trl'T6t¢. � liilrl4 � ?"� ,J'�� ,• >.. tlr- Via._ � � 'J �
y r z� ' r , . �'• .15� , rl� J, v . Iii r . 1 r �� `^� ,t. 'N rr � 1 ~ +�. � � � _
»tt Ll.,c � 1 - 1 � .. - �L1 c 1�4 � �; � .r � -. r , ri j �•
r
..E�.E.VAT1;'CS, lu.�.� r • .r = ' s w �+.
ri
Z!" FL C.o Or-
777�
G _ :. Lau
A
1 -14 HIM
• 15" _ [�
i 'if I' %
A'
(17r:
b T14 ELL E-: V'r-V-r
b•1
".`
'AZ _ . ^��•
Y
_ fir•
-
-
_ y •i
a 1
r
4 a�
� 7� .*• •C Vii;
A.
ir
a
'
---------------
'
. �
'
�
`
W
-
�
'
�
°
z
�
TOO
-
�
'
�
°
z
�
4
PEN" ro �� of y I
Y
• �. I I -Y f ' �S T' 1
I I
t• .41
y— -t
.. 'S ' •i 1 r• y�i.�, i. ) �i.'�� 1 • i �{ � 7 �l 1 � ^t�:1t � ��� "7 -" �-t. �1� •r� � I{ ` i.
I
s v s
t x � t aup y C` y ti
I I I
II I
y
s v s
t x � t aup y C` y ti
Q�,p INI
y
b --�k
I \�
�
'
•, I
i i� -t. �" � r,S ,,r t +}' r- 9
LYfs �%
"r -
K � � /Are
=?
t
,
1. � 1 7.f•bt h
1. t
�
�
Y '1 .
t'
m
LL
1
L., I
r. {
,• r
V 1 1• /
rr• s.l. V 1 r ;. 1
/y
rT
,&:447 ih, � A • E r• T � l _ , , -� V , _ r I/Q r. i
Al
�. •'Rr. i _�__' rt � i+a ,�, rr�. -� t,� :, , rit+S �T �;_. � �'', { � �`v � }Y ;, k � �. •� r,*` -r 'i
t �
t
�! r
�J��AXWiL�u7ktli ►iii. +.l
r.. � --
. -r,
r��'l.l yip '} � '� Y Y f '1- F..F. � ••t,
M'!i {r` �+1
t
�
..;:
ll
Ito
:1
i
r.. � --
. -r,
r��'l.l yip '} � '� Y Y f '1- F..F. � ••t,
M'!i {r` �+1
t
�
..;:
ll
Ito
:1
1+1+1ttr``r , •:� !4..
y %1
�
n „�� } !
` � �r,11��1Y�' .. a1 H for
L.. s: i'-'ir
y,' t r,
4 Ala i'r
F
}���F� \•K•/`, ✓A�j�
I•
I,Y'! ,� I .•
..
(: ^I �F�T 11•' \ ..
,•Y};i,.J. {(.�•y,y�y�,
'lIC 1i
Edina City Council
6 -1F -I/
Robert and Carol Bossman
4609. MoorJand Aye.
Edina, MN 55424
Gentleman:
We are appealing a decision made by the Edina planning commission on Thursday
March 3, 1984. We had requested a variance to build on 26.7% of our lot. All
other regulations and set backs conform. The planning commission rejected our
request because
A) A new code was just written in early 1984
B.) The new code allows for variences of up to 30% on lots smaller,
than 9,000 sq ft. There is no consideration of lots larger tfi.n
9,000 sq ft.
We have reviewed the ordinance and feel that it is a fair-.one.. ;We do think howeyer
that it fails to cover certain areas like the werstern part of Country Club.that has
larger homes on 1920 -1930 sized lots. Ther have been several variences ineastern
Country Club on smaller lots and we feel that these past examples were part of the
reason for the up to 30% clause in the new regulations. We feel thatlimiting the
exception to lots under 9,000 sq ft is arbritary and presents a hardship to the
west Country Club area.
The addition we are.planning would use 26. &5 of our 9,950 sq ft lot,. We would
need a lot size of 10,650 sq ft to be legal. The houses in west Edina . areas like
Dewey Hill are on lots of 14,000 to.35,00 sq ft(. far larger than the 10,650 sq ft
we would need)
We have discussed our plans with .all of our neighbors and find that 11 the neighbor
hood does not object to the addition and 2) half our neighbors were at the planning
commission meeting to support us..
We are requesting that the Edina City. Council amend the regulations of the
lot coverage section to allow 30% lot coverage of lots up'to 11,000 sq ft or
else allow us a- varience under the hardship clause,
Thank you,
Robert M. Bossman
arch -type roof or to the average distance of the highest gable
on a pitched or hip roof.
(d) Rear Yard Setback - Interior Lots. If the rear lot
line is less than 30 feet in length or if the lot forms a point
at the rear and there is no rear lot line, then for setback
purposes the rear lot line shall be deemed to be a straight line
segment within the lot not less than 30 feet in length,
perpendicular to a line drawn from the midpoint of the front lot
line to the junction of the interior lot lines, and at the
maximum distance from the front lot line.
(e) Rear Yard Setback - Corner Lots Required to Maintain
Two Front Street Setbacks. The owner of a corner lot required
to maintain two front street setbacks may designate any interior
lot line measuring 30 feet or more in length as the rear lot
line for setback purposes. In the alternative, the owner of a
corner lot required to maintain two front street setbacks may
deem the rear lot line to be a straight line segment within the
lot not less than 30 feet in length, perpendicular to a line
drawn from the junction of the street frontages to the _=unction
of the interior lot lines, said line segment being the maximum
distance from the junction of the street frontages.
(f) Through Lots. For a through lot, the required setback
for all buildings and structures from the street upon which the
single dwelling unit building does not front shall be not less
than 25 feet.
® 2. Building Coverage - Lots Less Than 9,000 Square Feet in
Area. Building coverage may be increased to 30 percent for lots less
than 9,000 square feet in area, provided, however, that the area
occupied by buildings and structures shall not exceed 2,250 square
feet.
3. One Dwelling Unit Per Single Dwelling Unit Lot. No more
than one dwelling unit shall be erected, placed or used on any lot
unless the lot is subdivided into two or more lots pursuant to the
City subdivision ordinance.
4. Decks and Patios. Notwithstanding the provisicns of
section 7 of this ordinance, the first 150 square feet of an
unenclosed deck or patio shall not be included when computing
building coverage.
5. Basements. All single dwelling unit buildings shall be
constructed with a basement having a gross floor area equal to at
least 50 percent of the gross floor area of the story next above.
The floor area of accessory uses shall not be included for making the
above calculation.
11 -7
r �
LOT COVERAGE 4609 MOORLAND AVE
PRESENT
PROPOSED
HOUSE 13.2%
21.4%
GARAGE 4.0%
5.3%
TOTAL 17.2%
26.7%
4612
16.7%
4610
21r -23%
MOORLAND AVENUE
4611
(13.2% )
20%
4608
21-23%
4609
17.2%
26.7%
ROBERT M. BOSSMAN
HEIBERG 4614 WOODDALE AVENUE
9480 sq ft lot
1% lot coverage varience granted 6/10/82
4606
24,0%
N .• —�j--
4607
X19 -20%
IIWI6S OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA
BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS
HELD ON THURSDAY, JUNE 10, 1982, AT 5:30 P.A4.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
OLD BUSINESS:
Chairman Gordon Johnson, Helen McClelland and
Leonard Ring
Harold Sand, Assistant Planner
Joyce Repya, Planning Secretary
B-82 -12 Hoff Heiberg, 4614 Wooddale Avenue, Lot 14, Block 10,
Country Club District, Brown Section.
Gordon Johnson determined that a quorum was present and called the
meeting to order. Mr. Johnson then announced that he would abstain from
voting on this issue.
Mr. Sand advised the Board that Mr. Heiberg has revised his plans in
accordance with the direction of the Board and wishes of the neighborhood.
The current proposal is a two story addition in the rear of the dwelling with
a family room on the lower level and the multi - purpose room on the second
,!level. The design of the addition has been modified to more closely match
the design of the existing dwelling. The hipped rooi matches the pitch and
materials used on the roof of the dwelling. The windows, trim and wall sur-
�facing also match the dwelling. The wall surfaces are stucco except the area
below the windows which is exposed wood. The bay window on the north wall
of the second level of the addition will be moved from the dwelling.
r
l The revised plans have eliminated the side yard variance and reduced
~the lot coverage variance to less than 1 percent. Mr. Sand further explained
that with the 9,845 square foot lot, the 25 percent lot coverage would be 2,461
square feet. The existing dwelling, garage and deck maintain 2,370 square feet
for a 24.10 lot coverage. The proposed addition (243 sq. ft.) less the portion
of the deck which will.be removed (60 ft.) will add an additional 183 sq. ft. of
lot coverage to the site. The total proposed coverage will be 2,553 square feet,
for a lot coverage of 25. 93 0; 92 square feet above the 25% allowed.
Mr. Sand pointed out that the proposed variance has been reduced to a
minimal level and the addition has been designed to match the existing dwelling.
Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the lot coverage variance with the
oonditions that the variance is limited to the plans presented, and the exterior
materials of the addition match the exterior materials of the existing dwelling;
stucco should be used on all three walls.
Mr. Sand added that Mr. Davidson, 4612 Wooddale Avenue, the northerly
adjacent neighbor had discussed the revised plans with Staff and sent a letter
stating his approval of the revised plans.
Discussion ensued regarding the revised plans. It was mentioned that
the neighbors concerns were satisfied, and since no neighbors were present,
their approval of the new plans was assumed.
Helen McClelland stated that a 1 o variance would not cause a problem,
nting out that many homes in the neighborhood have received variances for
L. Special Meeting of the Board of Appeals,.
June 10, 1982 '
Page 2
a larger percentage of lot coverage than Mr. Heiberg is proposing. She then
moved for approval of the variance request with the conditions in the staff
report. Leonard Ring seconded the motion. All voted aye, with the exception
of Gordon Johnson who abstained; the motion carried.
11. NEXT MEETING DATE: June 17, 1982
III. ADJOURNMENT:
5:50 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
HIz'1 • X' iV ac.
Joyce G. Repya, Secretary
n_
-t.
LOCATION MAP
-zr,c / I
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
N U M B E R S -84 -7 Indian Hills 2nd Addition
Z -84 -1
LOCATION Generally located west of Gleason and south of Crosstown Highway
R E Q U E S T R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AULE1
%
TII,OL BEST
r t CROSSVI
C UTMERA
-
LAN
..
REf K•.• VALLEY..' .
'
CREEK VALLE)
:: :a•.
T,M�E \
ELEM. SCMOC
r
'
NO L•
BALOER
>>
CORCLA
-
Q'
i.
h
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
N U M B E R S -84 -7 Indian Hills 2nd Addition
Z -84 -1
LOCATION Generally located west of Gleason and south of Crosstown Highway
R E Q U E S T R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
0. 6 1 NEW BUSINESS:
S -84 -7 Indian Hills 2nd Addition.
Z -84 -1 R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to
���� R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District
`J i
Mr. Hughes reported that the subject property measures
4.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit
District. The property is now part of the Crossview Lutheran
Church site which encompasses about 14 acres. The proponent
requests the subdivision of the property into ten lots and the
rezoning of the lots to R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District. Nine
of these lots would face McCauley Trail. The tenth is landlocked
and presumably unbuildable. The nine proposed lots range in area
from 15,050 square feet to 19,976 square feet. Staff finds four
of the nine lots slightly below the 90 foot minimum lot width
requirement and the other five exactly 90 feet.
Mr. Hughes informed the Commission that a major
constraint to the development of this property is the presence of
a wetland. This wetland has been classified as a "public water"
by the State, and therefore, filling or alteration of this
wetland is restricted and subject to the grant of a permit from
the Deparment of Natural Resources. The proposed development
will necessitate additional filling and it appears that the
grading plan which has been submitted can be accomplished within
the D.N.R.'s parameters. The proposed development appears
feasible from a wetland's standpoint.
The subject property is presently designated "quasi -
public" by the Comprehensive Plan in that it is part of a church
site. If the project is approved, the Plan should be-amended to
designate this property as "low density attached ". Other
properties which front on McCauley Trail are presently designated
low density. Staff believes such a amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan is logical and recommends the rezoning to R -2.
However, Mr. Hughes stated some modifications to the
subdivision are in order. Staff suggests the elimination of at
least one lot which would increase the average lot width
requirements to an average of 100 feet. The wetland on the site
precludes full utilization of the depth of these lots and, thus,
an adequate lot width is even more important. If the subdivision
included only seven R -2 lots, the average width would be about
115 feet and would better accommodate the type of double
bungelows built in this area.
Lot 10 of the proposed subdivision is unbuildable due to
lack of access and the presence of the wetland. He recommended
that Lot 10 be eliminated and its area incorporated into the
remaining lots.
Mr. Hughes reminded the Commission and those in
attendance that a conditional use permit would be required for
future expansion of any type on the property remaining in church
ownership. Also, the church property is, in essence, part of
this subdivision and, therefore, should be subject to normal
platting requirements. The church building is not now connected
to sanitary sewer. Such a sewer will be extended to serve the R-
2 lots. Plat approval should be conditioned upon connection to
this sewer.
South of the church building is large tract of land
containing one dwelling. This property will likely be developed
in future years. Staff recommends the westerly 34 feet of the
church property be subject to a public road easement which when
combined with a 16 foot strip of land adjoining the west side of
the church property would create a feasible street right of way
for future use.
Based on Staff's proposed modifications, approval was
recommended with the following conditions:
1. Subdivision dedication.
2. Developer's Agreement which includes the extension of
sanitary sewer mains and the extension of a storm sewer.
3. Conservation Restriction covering the wetland area.
During the course of construction, a snow fence erected to
delineate the limits of grading is recommended.
4. Grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer
extensions.
5. Grant of a D.N.R. permit. -
6. Petition to install permanent street surfacing and
curb and gutter on McCauley Trail West abutting the R -2 lots.
Mr. Jeff Gustafson and Mr. Greg Gustafson, proponents,
presented a revised subdivision proposal which illustrated eight
lots and the division of the unbuildable Lot 10 of the previous
proposal plus a small triangular piece of land as an outlot.
They assured the Commission that they were request no variances
on these parcels.
Mrs. McClelland wondered if the proposed plans should be
submitted to the Watershed District for review before the
Planning Commission. Mr. Hughes explained that the wetland was
classified as public water instead of a floodplain and,
therefore, would be under the jurisdiction of the D.N.R. not the
Watershed. Greg Gustafson stated that D.N.R. required them to
approach the Planning Commission first.
Mrs. McClelland was concerned that the doubles would be
too much structure for the lots because of their setback
requirements.
Greg Gustafson stated that doubles were the most
practical proposal for the property. Fill would be necessary in
order to comply with the setback requirements. The doubles would
be smaller than the neighboring doubles in order to be level with
the Crosstown Highway for appearance purposes. He noted that in
response to Staff's recommendation for road access on the
westerly side of the property, the Church would have to be
consulted.
Frank Matthews, 6400 Timber Ridge, expressed his approval
of the development subject to the larger width recommendation.
He pointed out a drainage problem on the easterly end of the
proposed subdivision.
Jeff Gustafson reported that in consulting the D.N.R. a
ponding system has been recommended. He used visual aids to
illustrate where three ponds with controlled gates would be
located for the water which eventually drains into Arrowhead
Lake. The ponding would encourage wildlife habitat.
Greg Gustafson addressed the lift station' and sewer
connection issue stating that the funds received from the sale of
the proposed lots was intended for church expansion to the east.
Plans for the installation of a lift station had already been
discussed.
Woody Cater, 6316 Post Lane, stated that his objection
was not in regards to the development, instead he objected to the
90 or 100 foot lot width. He believed that there was a setback
problem and commented that he would like to see homes similar in
quality to Ron Clark's development on Gleason Court. Greg
Gustafson said although the homes they were proposing to
construct were to be smaller; they would not be of lesser
quality. The sale of eight lots was necessary in order to cover
the large cost of soil correction in order to make the homes fit
within the setback requirements.
Mrs. McClelland supported only six or seven lots and Mr.
Lewis agreed.
Mr. Palmer agreed with Staff's recommendation of seven
lots. He moved for approval subject to all of Staff's
recommendations and Mrs. Shaw seconded the motion. All were in
favor; Mrs. McClellend obstained. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND- PLANNING: COMMISSION,
STAFF REPORT
MAY 30, 1984 .
S -84 77 Indian Hills 2nd Addition
Generally located:. West of Gleason and south of Crosstown Highway
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and grading plan
The subject property measures 4.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1 Single
Dwelling Unit District. The property is now part of the Crossview Lutheran
Church site which encompasses about 14 acres. The proponent requests the
subdivision of the property into ten lots and the rezoning of the lots to R -2
Double Dwelling Unit District. Nine of these lots would face McCauley'Trail.
The tenth lot is landlocked and presumably unbuildable.. The proposed lots
(excluding. lot 10) range in area from 15, 050 square feet to 19, 976 square feet
which exceeds the minimum required area of 15, 000 square feet. The Zoning
Ordinance requires minimum lot widths of 90 feet for R -2 lots. According to
the ordinance, lot widths are measured at a point '50 feet from the front lot line.
If measured according to this method, we find that four of the nine lots are
Slightly below the 90 foot minimum. The other five lots are exactly 90 feet.
A major constraint to the development of this property is the presence of a
wetland. Because of its size and water depth, this wetland has been classified
as a "public water" by the State. As such, the filling or alteration of this
wetland is restricted and subject to the. grant of a permit from the Department
of Natural Resources: Substantial amounts of fill have place on this property
during past years. This filling has been done according to a plan approved by
the D.N.R. • The proposed development will necessitate additional filling which
again is subject to D °N.R,. approval. Although a specific permit request has
not been'processed by the D.N,.R., it appears that the grading plan which has
been submitted can be accomplished within the D.N.R.'s parameters. Thus,
the proposed development appears feasible from a wetland's standpoint.
The subject property is presently designated "quasi- public" by the Comprehensive
Plan in that it is part of -a church site. The Plan should be amended if this
project is approved. The Plan would then designatethis property as "low, .
density attached." Other properties which front on McCauley Trail are presently
designated low density attached by the Plan
The proponent's plans also show a preliminary layout of a future parking lot
on the property which wll be retained by the Church. Although this parking
lot is not now proposed, `it is apparently shown to indicate that the Church is
S -84 -7
May 30, 1984
Page two
satisfied with the potential which remains on their site for expansion. It should
be noted that parking lot expansions as well as building expansions require
the grant of conditional use permits
Recommendation
The proposed use of the subject property for R -2 lots is expected and responds
to the direction which has been given by staff to the church and prospective
developers. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to extend low density
attached uses to include the subject property is logical and reflects the use
made of other properties in the vicinity. Such an amendment is therefore,
recommended as is the proposed rezoning to R -2.
Staff believes, however, that some modifications to the subdivision are in order.
As noted earlier, the proposed lots are below minimum lot width requirements.
The elimination of one lot would increase the average lot width to 100 feet which
complies with the ordinance. However, other R -2 lots on McCauley Trail measure
110 -120 feet in width and those on Gleason Court, to the north of the Crosstown,
measure 110 -145 feet in width. Our records indicate that the average building width
of doubles on McCauley Trail is 85 feet. The widths of doubles on Gleason Court
exceed 90 feet.
In my opinion, the doubles constructed on the subject lots will be designed to
be compatible with and competitive with other doubles in the area. The wetland
on the site precludes full utilization of the depth of these lots and, thus, an
adequate lot width is even more important. If the subdivision included only
seven R -2 lots, the average width would be about 115 feet. Such lots would
better accommodate the type of double bungelow built in this area. Staff,
therefore, recommends such a modification.
Lot 10 of the proposed subdivision is unbuildable due to lack of access and the
presence of the wetland. In my view, the platting of this area into a separate lot
serves no useful purpose. Such lots frequently are forfeited due to non - payment
of taxes. We recommend that Lot 10 be eliminated and its area incorporated into
the remaining lots.
As to the property remaining in church ownership, it again should be stressed
that conditional use permits are required for future expansions of any type.
No approvals of any improvements schematically shown as the church site are
implied by the approval of this subdivision. The church should consult the
Zoning Ordinance as well as the requirements of the D.N.R. when planning any
improvements.
Also, the church property is, in essence, part of this subdivision and, therefore,
should be subject to normal platting requirements. The church building is not
now connected to sanitary sewer. Such a sewer will be extended to serve the
R -2 lots. As a condition to plat approval, we recommend that the church be
required to connect to this sewer.
00.', of the church building is a large tract of land containing one dwelling
(the Naas property) . This property will likely be developed in future years.
A 16 foot wide strip of land adjoining the west side of the church property
connects the Naas property to McCauley Trail. Although future public road
access to the Naas property could perhaps come from Post Lane to the west,
the topography in the area would make such a road extremely steep. Staff
S -84 -7
May 30, 1984
Page three
therefore, recommends that the westerly 34 feet of the church property
should be subject to a public road easement. When combined with the
existing 16 foot strip, a feasible public street right of way would exist
for future use.
With the above conditions and modifications, Staff recommends approval
with the following conditions:
1. Subdivision Dedication.
2. Developer's Agreement which includes the extension of sanitary
sewer mains (which will probably require a lift station.) and the extension
of a storm sewer.
3. Conservation Restriction covering the wetland area. During
the course of construction, we recommend that a snow fence be erected
to delineate the limits of grading.
4. Grant of easements to facilitate storm sewer extensions.
S. Grant of a D.N.R. permit.
6. Petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and
gutter on McCauley Trail West abutting the R -2 lots.
1
-'- -. rNSTf LL C¢NTQOL STQUL JUpp
v
v7 -_
XI1r-
<iossv N/
L_ �� •�� ` • // C Fv�) /� %I' � ESa. S>o o `6 ' �o ¢rP H'LCJroN c¢IO e1 0 <a NO
_ u. _ a��• i i 1 __ v.o
/� �� "f _ • l/" .� _ .. p _ .. 300 J �! _
JJ �\ \
AOJAGE NT CNVRL4 PROPe4'1Y _, a �� n po•Vicad) �\ � b"; �i, �,l. � \�� � ALE /� =S7'
_ _ 111 \ /G7m
CoRRECTEO uNOER P2EVi0Ub1 1 ` _ Q / 2 ����4� `Pr w`Q GUSTAll. ANOa A�OC,ATb�
yy -. � :� •yD O L 1`'•9015 WEST
('_ °.� � "•l:''.�C .,Oy -1 x \g \ EO /NArE /NN6.SOlA, 55o3S
CYO
Y
S/Tf, DATA
d: JAL 6AN - AREA- SLrFT�4.5 AG= °9i "'�. �'•i' M1 �� • -_
/NL: A'ETLANO AREA- BZ,000 SOFT 1 A "' -' • \ /\ \\
_ PROVO5E0 Grtt 9, 50o Sa.F7 I /
1
ow
Lm•L ocsc•ursc•
b0 rn•e vrx •e rv, u••• r, rn. n.n•r• trmv e••s et • / / RI ��
\ `
( Y .n..••m.y neix•ren..n r•rx.r •e o1a Iee n..c• /
'\ I 1 .. ..• .e •.mi •eoM`^v e• e.ve.�.. '• 1 •x e / ,
i / Cbunc. [sa . •long n rtn IIn• > . ^^ Le[`e�e /
f .a` r•ie.a e•..�e
•:0.:1..e :: •�n.1i:�n'." `i ` ` ' : "` " PpEL /MINA 2Y PLAT o{
\ I so•en 11.• or .mcxee !1 a m.r• .. •i \u an
I `�.1••e l.v.
SND /AN N/LLS 2ND ADDITION
• \ \� pON KgUEGEFi 6 ASSOCIATES. INC.
PRO•�o5e 0 — —
p"Q. 'Al
Q�• <. PROPOSED GRADING PLAN
a ea z.a0
A 4owNEAYL
LAKE
FF
ZL- G
CROSS VIEW Lutheran Church Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dean Nadaed 6645 McCauley Trail
Pastor Y Crosstown (62) Highway and Gleason Road
Office: (612) 941 -1094
Parsonage: (612) 941.7516
June 18, 1984;
GUSTAFSON REPLAT OF
CROSS VIEW LUTHERAN CHURCH PROPERTY
RE: Conditions to be imposed by the City of Edina.
ITEM #1: Church connection to Gustafson sewer extension.
In anticipation of City requirements and our imminent church
building expansion, Cross View Lutheran Church of Edina is
requiring Gustafson Associates to install a sewer lift sta-
tion accessable to Cross View and with adequate capacity to
handle Cross View's future needs.
We request that the sewer connection be required at the time
of the church facilities expansion for the following reasons
A. Present drain field is more than adequate to meet
the present facility needs.
1. Average Sunday (2 hours) attendance is only
175 souls.
2. Occasional weekday attendance is 2 to 30 souls.
3. At present, educational facilities are limited
to only one large room and a small nursery.
B. Because of our need to better serve our community,
Cross View Lutheran Church of Edina has engaged an
architect and has accepted schematic drawings of a
church addition. Study models have been con-
structed. We anticipate that the sale of this pro-
perty will tip the financing scale so that we can
start construction in 1985.
To connect the present facilities to the City sewer system
would duplicate many of the installation expenses and ulti-
mately could postpone the future church addition. This
would be an unnecessary financial burden which would not
benefit anyone.
J
Cross View Lutheran Church
Gustafson Replat
June 18, 1984
Page 2
IT= #2: The Planning Commission's reduction from nine to
seven lots in the proposed plat will substan-
tially reduce the financial return to Cross View
Lutheran Church.
A compromise of eight lots would keep our
Building Program, Christian Family Life Center
and Early Childhood Program on track for the
benefit of the Greater Edina Community.
ITM #3: Thirty -Four feet of westerly Cross View property
for street right -of -way.
A. This westerly 34' x 220' represents a part of our
only filled and paved parking lot. Our needs and
City requirements will force us into replacing this
area.
B. Cross View Lutheran Church will have to fill com-
pact, and pave the replacement parking space.
C. The new road will require Cross View to set back
the remaining parking area, grade and landscape the
easterly boundry.
There is no question about a substantial financial impact on
Cross View Lutheran Church, all to the benefit of a third
party who will be provided access without any cost. This
third party will also gain a marketable lot on Post Lane
which he has already provided as access to his property.
Grade through this lot should not be any greater than those
in the Timbers Development.
While the City may have the right to obtain improved pro-
perty in this manner, I do not believe they want to impose a
substantial financial burden on one resident to the substan-
tial financial gain of another.
Cross View Lutheran Church of Edina would like to suggest
the following:
A. When the Naas property is platted, they should
deed a fifty foot strip along their north border to
Cross View Lutheran Church as compensation for the
thirty -four foot strip along our westerly border.
B. As an alternate, Cross View Lutheran Church would
accept a thirty -four foot strip of the east side of
the Naas property, again abutting our Cross View
property.
Cross View Lutheran Church
Gustafson Replat
June 18, 1984
Page 3
C. In any event, all costs of developing a road on the
thirty -four foot right -of -way should be born by the
developer.
Cross View Lutheran Church should be permitted to
have access from this road. Because this is pre-
sently an important parking area, the church should
be granted a variance in set back and permitted
parking up to the road right -of -way.
Cross View Lutheran Church has always tried to cooperate
with the Edina Planning Department, the Watershed District
and Department of Natural Resources. We did hire Brauer and
Associates to develop an acceptable land plan when requested
a few years ago. We have followed this plan.
Also, at the request of the Edina Planning Department, Cross
View Lutheran Church worked out an agreement with Folke
Victorson to provide access to his Timbers Development.
Cross View received $19,000.00 for about one acre of our
property. In addition to access, Mr. Victorson was able to
plat three additional lots which were later sold for
$150,000.00.
After having worked with the Edina Planning Department
intimately and cooperatively on two separate occasions,
Cross View Lutheran Church has never been informed of a
future need to provide access to the Naas property to the
south.
If this street access through Cross View Lutheran Church
property is really necessary, we are sure that an equi-
table arrangement can be worked out.
Cross View Lutheran Church should not be burdened by the
unexpected loss of it's property while it's neighbor re-
ceives a substantial financial benefit. This should not
be added to the financial penalty of a reduction in plat-
ting from the requested nine lots to seven lots.
Sincerely,
CHARLES C. SEDGWICR
Chairman, Building Committee
Cross View Lutheran Church
CCS /nst
LOCATION
W
SOUTHDALE
OPPING CENTER
V
1.
Y
KY
O H
1
69 TH.
ST
Q L7___j
I I
luj I
it.
..........
AOAO
HAZELTOM
W I
YOIRKTOWN I
7�_Li 3
N�
CONDITIONAL USE
NUMBER C -84 -1 Southdale Library & Service Center
L O C A T 10 N 7001 York Avenue
REQUEST Expansion of Off - Street Parking
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
G -�
P
y,� Mr. Hu hes noted that at H ennepin County proposed to
undertake a removation of portion of Southdale Library to
accommodate new munipal court facilities. These facilities will
occupy that portion of the library now used for offices for
Library Administrative and Technical Services which will
apparently be relocated to Ridgedale Library. The municipal
court facility will include three court rooms and staff offices.
The proposed renovation will be complete internal and will not
result in the expansion of the building's floor area.
C -84 -1 Southdale Library & Service Center.
Expansion of Off - Street Parking Facility.
7001 York Avenue
According to the Zoning Ordinance, 10 parking spaces plus
one space per 300 square feet are required for library uses and
one space per 200 square feet is required for offices and
courtrooms. Based upon our review of the plan, we calculate a
parking requirement of 360 spaces. The present parking lot
provides 360 spaces. Therefore, no additional spaces need be
constructed in connection with the renovation to comply with the
Zoning Ordinance. However, the applicant has conducted addi-
tional studies and proposes to expand portions of the parking lot
southerly and easterly to provide approximately 70 additional
spaces.
The subject property is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit
District. Civic institutions-such as this, are considered a
conditional use in R -1 District and a conditional use permit is
required in order to enlarge the parking area.
Mr. Hughes stated that Staff believes that the applicant
has conducted detailed studies to justify the parking needs of
the facility and recommended approval.
Francis Bulbulian, architect for the applicant, presented
detailed plans and was available to answer questions.
Mrs. McClelland moved for approval and Mr. Skagerberg
seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried.
r
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 30, 1984
C -84 -1 Sou;thdale Library & Service Center. Expansion of Off - Street Parking
Facility
- Refer • #o: Attached Site Plan`
Located: 7001 York Avenue.
Hennepin County proposes to undertake a renovation of portions of
South`dale Library to accommodate view municipal court facilities. These
facilities will occupy that portion of -the library now used for offices for
Library Administrative and Technical Services which will apparently be
relocated to Ridgedale Library. The municipal court facility will include
three court rooms and staff offices. The proposed renovation will be completely
internal and will not result in the expansion of the building's floor area.
According to the Zoning Ordinance, 10 parking spaces plus one space per
300 square feet are required for' library uses and one space per 200 square
feet is required for offices and courtrooms. Based upon our review of the
plans, we calculate a parking requirement of 360 spaces. The present
parking lot provides 360 spaces. Therefore, no additional spaces need
be constructed in connection with the renovation to comply with the Zoning
Ordinance. However, the applicant has conducted additional studies and
has concluded that more parking is desirable._ Therefore, the applicant
proposes to expand portions of the parking lot southerly and easterly to
provide approximately 70 additional spaces. The setback for the expanded
lot would be 10 feet from the south property line and 24 feet from the east
line (i.e. Xerxes Avenue).
The subject property is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Civic
institutions such as this, are considered a conditional use in the,R -1 District.
According to the Zoning Ordinance, a conditional use permit is required prior to
any' such use being increased in floorarea or any accessory, parking Jot being
expanded to accommodate more cars. In this case, the building will not be
increased in floor area but the parking. lot will be enlarged. Therefore, the latter
requires a conditional use permit.
Recommendation
Staff believes that the applicant has conducted detailed studies to justify the
parking needs of the facility. We certainly encourage the applicant
to provide a comfort margin of parking for the proposed new use. The
proposed parking expansion complies with all other requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance concern.ing setbacks and other dimensions. The lot will, be adequately
screened from surrounding .properties as °a- result of substantial landscaping.
We believe that the findings required 'by Section 4D. of the Zoning Or have
been met and we, therefore, recommend approval of the permit.
—
�
�
°
�
°
�
e
---------
!| /
� | | —'����---------------
/
_
|
' |
SA
—
'u.
SITE PLAm ^
� �° �
!*" �\
��./*,.�
~`
�-_---�--
|
� |
Vtl
SA
—
'u.
SITE PLAm ^
� �° �
!*" �\
��./*,.�
~`
or t.
LL
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 18, 1984
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, Comprehensive Planner
�c
SUBJECT: Summary of Redevelopment Plans for Grandview Commercial - Industrial area.
Attached are the proposed Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview
Redevelopment Project Number One. Together the Plan and Project serve as
the basis for the establishment of a Tax Increment Financing Project for the
Grandview Area.
The Redevelopment Plan and Project were considered by the Community Development
and Planning Commission at its May 30, meeting. At that time the Commission
passed a resolution recommending adoption of the Plan and Project by the
HRA and the City Council.
In order to meet the statutory requirements forthe..establishment of a new tax
increment district two separate documents are needed. First, the Redevelop-
ment plan describes existing conditions, documents problems in the area, and
recommends certain redevelopment activities to correct problems and achieve
goals and objectives established for the area. Second, the Redevelopment Project
serves as the finance plan for redevelopment activities. It estimates the public
cost of the project, the method of financing the cost, and the tax increment
expectedto repay the tax increment bonds.
The Redevelopment Plan, in Section II, describes existing problems in the Plan
Area. The Plan points out a substantial quantity of substandard buildings,
non - conforming buildings and land uses, obsolete uses, and under utilized
properties. The arrangement of public parking, and the inadequate amount of
parking in the commercial core of the area are also identified in the Plan.
In addition traffic and circulation problems set forth in the "Grandview Area
Traffic Study," prepared by BRW, Inc., are incorporated into the Plan.
Based upon these problems the Redevelopment Plan concludes that certain
redevelopment activites are warranted. Among the goals and objectives
set forth in the Redevelopment Plan are:
1. Promote development and redevelopement in a manner consi.stent
with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. To improve the efficiency of the street and roadway system through
the implementation of the road improvements recommended in the "Grandview
Area Traffic Study."
3. To promote and secure additional public parking in the area.
I
Grandview Commerical - Industrial Area
June 18, 1984
Page two
4. To promote and secure the redevelopment of parcels with substandard
and non - conforming buildings to more clearly define land uses and provide
a more efficient utilization of properties.
The Redevelopment Plan also emphasizes improving the aesthetics and
definition of the area through increased buffering, especially landscaping.
Redevelopment Project No. 1 anticipates a total public redevelopment cost of
approximately $4, 500, 000. This cost would be paid by the issuance of
General obligation Tax Increment bonds and through special assessments
against benefitting properties. The bonds would be amoritized over 25 years.
The public costs include the roadway improvements to Vernon Avenue and
the construction of 400 stall, four level parking ramp on the site now housing
City storage facilities. Expected private redevelopment includes the
redevelopment of the Biltmore Motel with condominiums, increased retail
and office space near the Jerry's complex, redevelopment of three si.ng1e
family houses with eight townhouse units, and redevelopment of the area containing
the Biltmore Bowl, Jerry Leonards and a small office building with additional office
space. A later redevelopment would involve the railroad property and the
industrial area south of Eden Avenue.
The Redevelopment Plan is proposed to be undertaken in two or more phases.
Phase I of the project would involve the following public costs:
1. Demolition of existing City storage buildings and the construction
of a two level parking ramp (approximately 200 spaces) with the ground
floor reserved for City storage.
2. Road improvements to the area referred to as Issue Area 1 i.n the
Traffic Study, i.e. the Sherwood, Eden,. Vernon intersection and Link Road.
3. Construction of a major new intersection serving Jerrys, lst Bank,
and Union 76, including access to the parking ramp.
The total public cost of the Phase I project would be $2, 556, 000. Twenty - percent
of the cost is proposed to be specially assessed leaving a cost of $2, 1.50, 000
for which bonds would be sold. The bond issue would be amoritizecl over a
period of 25 years with the tax increment provided by redevelopment and a
general inflation increment on the 51 parcels in the district.
In order to proceed with the Redevelopment Plan and Project it is necessary
that the H.R.A. adopt the Plan and Project and that the City Council approve
the Plan and Project and authorize the City Clerk to request certification of
the Tax Increment Financing District by the County Auditor. Attached
are the appropriate resolutions for HRA and Council action.
FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS BY, AND RESOLUTIONS OF,
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT,AUTHORITY OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA, RELATIVE TO AND APPROVING A
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR
GRANDVIEW AREA, EDINA, MINNESOTA
ENTITLED " GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1"
DATED MAY 30, 1984
WHEREAS, the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina, Minnesota (the "Authority "), has prepared a redevelopment
plan for the Grandview area of Edina, Minnesota for the Grandview
area of Edina Minnesota entitled "The Grandview Area
Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984, (the "Plan "), for a
project to be undertaken pursuant to the Plan and designated as
Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project "); and
WHEREAS, the Plan and Project was duly transmitted by the
Authority to the Community Development and Planning Commission of
the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "Planning Commission ") being
duly designated and acting official planning agency of the Edina,
for its study and with a request for its written opinion thereon;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at its meeting on May
30, 1984, did, by resolution duly adopted, render its written
opinion on the Plan and Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine:
That the Plan provides an outline for the development and
redevelopment of the area within the Project, is sufficiently
complete to indicate the relationship of the Plan to the
objectives fo the City of Edina as to appropriate land uses with
the Project and to indicate the general land uses and general
standards of development or redevelopment with the Project,
conforms to the Comprehensive Plan to the City and approve of the
Plan and Project and recommend approval thereof to the Authority
and City Council.
/r
V
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1
TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE GRANDVIEW TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, MAKING FINDINGS
AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE GRANDVIEW
TAX TNC'RFMFym FTNA1�7rT1`� nTSTRTC'T
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. This Council has received the written opinion
of the City Planning Commission as to the Grandview Area Redevelopment
Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) and Grandview Redevelopment Project
No. 1 (the Project) and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan
(the Tax Increment Financing Plan) for Grandview Tax Increment
District (the District), and on June 18, 1984, held a public
hearing on the same after notice of the public hearing was
published in the Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City,
on the gofK, day of , 1984. All persons desiring to be
heard were heared.
2. This Council finds that the Project is a redevelopment
project within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421,
subdivision 13. The Project will contribute to the public
health, safety and welfare.
3. This Council finds that the District is--a redevelopment
district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73,
subdivision 10, as seventy percent (70 %) of the parcels in
the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities
or other improvements and at least twenty percent (20 %) of
the buildings in the District contain defects in structural
elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities
and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including
adequate egress, layout and condition of internal partitions
or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient
total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance,
and at least an additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings
in the District require substantial renovation or clearance
in order to remove such existing conditions as inadequate street
layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding
of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit denisty,
obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion.
4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521,
it is hereby found that:
(A) The land located with-in-the Project area would
not be made available for redevelopment without financial
aid sought;
(B) The Redevelopment Plan for the redevelopment
area within the City included therein will afford maximum
opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City
as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private
enterprise; and
(C) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general
plan for the development of the City as a whole.
.5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74,
subdivision 3, it is hereby found that:
(A) The District is a redevelopment district as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision
10.
(B) The proposed development in the opinion of this
Council would not occur solely through private investment
within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor
the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
(C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to
the general plan for the development of the City as a
whole.
(D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford
maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of
the City as a whole for the development of the District
by private enterprise.
(E) The City elects the method of tax increment
computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76,
subdivision 3, clause (a).
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to
request that the appropriate authorities-in the County of Hennepin
establish a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 273.74 for the premises in the City described
in the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
Attest:
Passed by the Council this 18th day of June, 1984.
City Clerk
-2-
Mayor
Commissioner Kc(- "rIf introduced the following
resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA
REDEVELOPMENTIPLAN, GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT
THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN;:APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW
AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT
THERETO, THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GRANDVIEW
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, AND REQUESTING
THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ")
as follows:
1. It has been proposed that the HRA approve a redevelopment
plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision
15, to be designated as the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan
(the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelopment project to
be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 13, to be designated as Grandview
Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project "), and that in order
to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by
the HRA in connection with the Revelopment Plan and Project,
it has been further proposed that the HRA approve a tax increment
financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.74, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment
Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan ") which establishes a tax
increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, subdivision 9, to be designated as Grandview
Tax Increment Financing District (the "District ").
2. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing
Plan and the District are described in the attached documents
entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" and "Grandview
Redevelopment Project No. 1 to be Undertaken Pursuant to the
Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment
Financing Plan of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Edina, Minnesota ", and the Redevelopment
Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District as so
described are hereby approved, and_ the Executive Director of
the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized
and directed to proceed with the implementation of the Redevelopment
Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District.
3. The Redevelopment Plan and the Project were transmitted
to the Community Development and Planning Commission (the "Commission ")
for its review and opinion. The Commission reviewed the Redevelopment
Plan and Project on May 30, 1984, and adopted a resolution
recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and Project.
4. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing
Plan and the District, together with the written opinion of
the Commission, shall be presented to the City Council for
a public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan and the Project
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing
Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, subdivision
3.
Dated the 18th day of June, 1984.
Chairman
Attest:
Executive Director
RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN,
GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT
THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN;
APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO,
THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, AND
REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of
Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. It has been proposed that the HRA approve a redevelopment plan, as defined
in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, to be designated as the
Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelop-
ment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.421, subdivision 13, to be designated as Grandview Redevelopment
Project No. 1 (the "Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelop-
ment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and
Project, it has been further proposed that the HRA approve a tax increment financ-
ing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, to be
designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan ") which
establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 273.73, subdivision 9, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment Fi-
nancing District (the "District ").
2. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District are
described in the attached documents entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan"
and "Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 to be Undertaken Pursuant to the Grand-
view Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan of the
Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota," and
the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District as so
described are hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the
attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the im-
plementation of the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the
District.
3. The Redevelopment _Plan and the Project were transmitted to the Community De-
velopment and -- Planning Commission (the "Commission ") for its review and opinion.
The Commission reviewed the Redevelopment Plan and Project on May 30, 1984, and
adopted a resolution recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and Pro-
ject.
4. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District,
together with the written opinion of the Commission, shall be presented to the
City Council for a public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan and the Project
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minne-
sota Statutes, Section 273.74, and subdivision 3.
V6
r
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND
GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT
THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE
GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, MAKING FINDINGS AND
REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows:
1. This Council has received the written opinion of the City Planning Commis-
sion as to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) and
Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Project) and Grandview Tax Incre-
ment Financing Plan (the Tax Increment Financing Plan) for Grandview Tax Incre-
ment District (the District), and on June 18, 1984, held a public hearing on
the same after notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun,
the official newspaper of the City, on the 30th day of May, 1984. All persons
desiring to be heard were heard.
2. This Council finds that the Project is a redevelopment project within the
scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 13. The Project will
contribute to the public health, safety and welfare.
3. This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the
scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10, as seventy percent
(70 %) of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utili-
ties or other improvements and at least twenty percent (20 %) of the buildings
in the District contain defects in structural elements or a combination of
deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire
protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of internal parti-
tions or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total
s- ignificance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and at least an
additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings in the District require
substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions
as inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships,
overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete
buildings not suitable for inprovement or conversion.
4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that:
(A) The land located within the Project area would not be made available
for redevelopment without financial aid sought;
(B) The Redevelopment Plan for the redevelopment area within the City in-
cluded therein will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private
enterprise; and
(C) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development
of the City as a whole.
5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, subdivision 3, it is hereby
found that:
(A) The District is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Stat-
utes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10.
(B) The proposed development in the opinion of this Council would not occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and
therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary.
w
.}
-2-
(C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the devel-
opment of the City as a whole.
(D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent
with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by
private enterprise.
(E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minne-
sota Statutes, Section 273.76, subdivision 3, clause (a).
6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate au-
thorities in the County of Hennepin establish a tax increment financing district
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74 for the premises in the City de-
scribed in the Tax Increment Financing Plan.
It, ,
GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Edina, Minnesota
May 30, 1984
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Inventory
A. Existing Land Use, Zoning -
B. Natural Features
C. Utilities
D. Traffic - Circulation
E. Existing Plans
II. Problem Assessment
A. Land Use
B. Traffic
III. Redevelopment Plan
A. Goals" and Objectives
B. Land Use
C. Parking and Circulation
D. Urban Design - Landscaping
E. Relocation
F. Project Cost and Method of Financing
G. Initial Redevelopment Project
I ' q
I. INVENTORY
Introduction
The Grandview area is mixed use commercial areas in North
.Central Edina. Much of the development in the area occured during the
early 1950's along Vernon Avenue which was then Highway 169/212.
The Grandview Redevelopment Plan Area, as proposed in
this document, is shown on Exhibit 1. The Plan Area is bounded
roughly by Highway 100 on the east, Vernon Avenue on the north
and west and Eden Avenue on the south.
A. Existing Land Use, Zoning
The Grandview area contains a mixture of residential
commerical and industrial uses. Existing land uses of individual
parcels are shown on the attached Exhibit 2. The plan area
contains approximately 66 acres and, with the exception of one
parcel is completely developed.
The central portion of the plan area is presently
developed with retail commercial uses along Vernon Avenue and
public owned industrial uses along the north side of,Eden Avenue.
The area north and west of Vernon Avenue is developed with a
mixture of single - family residential and commerical uses. The
area south of Eden Avenue is industrial with a small amount of
office. Our Lady of Grace Church and School borders the area on
X
W
Z
-j
(
Z
Lu
�F
a.
0
-i
Ljj
Lu
Q Q
W
NZ
U
•
'41W
A
INE
T: =z
A'
lop ARCADIA 1
7,
4'- r 0
A Ohl E4-T 10
L
F
'0 it PUK A NF
L
n V
�A �ND SOUTHERN----
V, BROOKSIDE
AVE. -7.0s Owe A
X Y
0
1;6 • FFL,--- J
V,
0
1� P
A
C
1. T-t 7L:
SUMMIT
-rjoN
DI
91 Ap
Le 09 CIO
WANNER
z 44 97 4
s 4.
Lo
, 91 0
t 91
N; 7 G.
r
HANKERSON AVE L
4
. j
ILI
WILLIAM AVE. G NOVIEW PLATEAU
Ir
02 Lj PLZ�
�1�5R Arl OF ? A
ry 1
-Y lim GRANDVIEW LANE
J. - - V , " ; 0 4
2 ADD. fo
Ise. PZA EAU l
BEDFORD
79-71 • AVE. "
• ♦ '0 0 '1 0 2,j
mi i . . . I � a -------
A
, loz-!
2
0 05?,
64
F4
Q
y
S ER 0 n
0
z
in
{Ny
0 m I A
LO
_L40 L
Ul
ILI
WILLIAM AVE. G NOVIEW PLATEAU
Ir
02 Lj PLZ�
�1�5R Arl OF ? A
ry 1
-Y lim GRANDVIEW LANE
J. - - V , " ; 0 4
2 ADD. fo
Ise. PZA EAU l
BEDFORD
79-71 • AVE. "
• ♦ '0 0 '1 0 2,j
mi i . . . I � a -------
A
, loz-!
I
BOUNDRY DESCRIPTION - GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AREA
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of Eden Avenue and Arcadia Avenue:
thence north along the centerline of Arcadia Avenue a distance of 400 feet; thence
east, at right angels to the centerline of Arcadia Avenue a distance of 300 feet;
thence north, parallel with the centerline of Arcadia Avenue a distance of 400 feet;
thence northwesterly to the northeast corner of Lot 1, Block 4, Tingdale Brothers
Brookside; thence north to the centerline of 'Vest 49th Street; thence west to the
intersection of the Interlachen Boulevard with the northerly extension of the east
line of Block 1, Brookside Heights; thence south on said east line to a point 35 feet
south of the northeast corner of Lot 14, said Block t, Brookside Heights; thence
west, parallel with the north line of said Lot 14, to the centerline of Hankerson Avenue;
thence south along said centerline of Hankerson Avenue to the centerline of West 52nd
Street; thence west along said centerline of West 52nd Street to its intersection with
the northerly extension of the east line of Block T, Replat of part of Grandview
e
Plateau; thence south along said east line and its xtension to the centerline of
West 53rd Street; thence east along said centerline of West 53rd Street to the
centerline of Vernon Avenue; thence southwesterly to an intersection with the northerly
extension of the west line of Lot 4, Block 3, Edenmoor; thence south to the south-
west corner of said Lot 4; thence east along the south line of said Lot 4 and its
easterly extension to the centerline of Sherwood Road; thence south to the centerline
of Edenmoor Street; thence east along said centerline and its easterly extension to the
centerline of the right -of -way of the Soo Line Railroad; thence northerly along said
centerline to an intersection with the westerly extension of the southerly line of
the following described parcel: Commencing at the intersection of the east line of the
Soo Line Railroad right -of -way with the southerly line of Eden Avenue; thence north-
easterly along said southerly line 120 feet; thence 52033' east a distance of 408.5 feet;
thence westerly to a point on the east line of the Soo Line Railroad right -of -way,
which point is 303.7 feet south of the southerly line of Eden Avenue; thence northerly
to the point of beginning; thence easterly along the south line of said parcel to the
southeast corner of said parcel; thence northerly along the east line of said parcel
and its extension to the centerline of Eden Avenue; thence northeasterly along said
centerline to the point of beginning.
the southeast. The entire Plan area is bisected north to south
by the Soo Line railroad right of way.
Exhibit 3 illustrates the present zoning classification
of all parcels within the plan area. Although most of the
existing uses in the area are permitted principal uses, according
to the Zoning Ordinance, many exhibit non - conforming features.
Most commerically zoned properties are non - conforming in terms of
parking quantity and parking setbacks. Outdoor storage, exterior
building materials, parking and building setbacks are common
problems in the industrially zoned properties.
B. Natural Features
Since the plan area is completely developed, there are no
areas where the original landscape has not been altered. The
existing topography does, however, limit the logical and
efficient development and redevelopment of the area. In the
central portion of the plan area there is a 35 foot grade
differential between the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen
and the intersection of Eden and Brookside Avenues. This grade
difference prevents the area from acting as a compact and
cohesive shopping area.
C. Utilities
Existing utilties serving the plan area are illustrated
on Exhibits 4, 5, and 6. Generally, existing public utilties are
� GOYA LA. i1 m I
2 n CIRC
�m
X
• . 4VF • dd91d0 COCHLOir COOPER A
�d CD 01'10 DR. wESTRR
� a0 9" lgDR. � 9 CIp �F3 EAS
1V E. P�Rs .t• DUN RD iO
SKYLIN S
ERR
�NOaAi �`'O ID- �v > O
ERN \ 1 6�C1R' EAST RD
R 9• BLOSSOMCT. 1) T
v_
OXFORD AVE
A
O
OXFORD 9" AVE I Z
9 Q.P io
- ^r
Z r cD_
BEDFORD AVE .D -K
. —
y F v°i •� G0
p GRANDVIEW LA.
+ 9 VANRKRVORK AVE
Y as I q 9 WILLIAMS
SHERWOOD N
I (n z
- .. i -
i y pRD HANK RSON -4 AVE 9 a"
2 r
CODE AVE. mO9 �`' a >J UTLEDGE AVE
� •1 CA � � IT AVE �
k `1
,-: BROOKSIDE AVE 9"
a' Z -
L
V) m
°°-
r
C r ARCADIA AVE w ° r 10
m v°► 9L a N
y O z
U 7 J
vHWY 169 - 100 A 1 LAURA
< 'a+- , 12
WEST SUNNY SLOP "RD.
1y/C $Oh
m J R 9s
Z
Q� DALE Ft10C PL `
15
c r. d` z c0�•
O
III UN
SNY 9" SLOPE RD. , n
DUN �TLIN
\ v e Coo
' NOaPi 6 Rns_ ! r I s ��-
ER IV \ G CIR EAST RD
BLOSSOM C T.
R 0.
N _
-- - -- - v OXFORD AVE ' w <
2 o £ is
' _ c a'•s r �� o
P� g m w s 3 fi 1_ -J 5. of `OXFORD IVOR k `. L'' BEDFORD AVE i CA GRANDVIEW LA. 6 6 � AVE
47 6AVE A SHERWOOO
_ y to z
—� —� - rnR0 6 W, S ANK RSON -4 AVE N 5
co ODE AVE rn z I s'' 6 „ e=
UTLEDGE AVE
ra-
9 N o �'`'f IT AVE
fn
Q Z ♦ _
,po ` W W ICK,q 01 �B.� 49ROOKSID AVE
9.1 J.1. L A.
»
O; 6
• F: SIDE TE
vz r
BO OK
ARCADIA AVE � � � �•
-0 m n - p W ST61. BROOK L
LA a -
A � Z
C a of MWY 169- 100
URA
m
I l
- cn� W WEST SUNNY SLOPE RD. \\ y
m !� so ` s, oL
.
m
+ DALE s rr : VL% PL T \
m
m j
to v S SUNNY SLOPE R0.
Z a ;�,� EA
Z K PL. BROwNDAI E
so
m c
f aAaL _
DUN RD
SKY LIN
6LENBa s
e.
EASTRQ - _ -
R D. BLASSOMCT;
• A
+ OXEM AVE .4
ie \ N I ;
�--� I o
J OXFORD AVE Z
z °
BEDFORD AVE
r �
GRANDVIEW LA. F
7n VAN VORK AVE
it W WILLIAMS AVE s
1V SHERWOOD N q A CLEVELAND
M < MRD \ HANK RSON -+ AVE S4
IY^ CODE AVE
LRUTLEDGEls-
'Pip.
y ummrr AVE a
rl
o
O� r m
X03 p ICK
W
r:. icy .BROOKSIDE AVE °
p °r It
p v ARCf ADIA AVE r or y i
LA m o W ST BROOK `
p .iX. .� 9G o NORTHA'
LAURA >a
z s• ,�
WEST SUNNY SLOPE RD.
m M' /�S 0 � j J
m o owl-
IF
O x
�.
mO SUNNY SLOPE R0.
Z n v EAST
r r
rAVE
• / m o,
adequate to serve existing development in the area. However,
three existing homes on Summit Avenue do not have access to
public water or sanitary sewer service. The southerly portion of
the Soo line Railroad property is not presently served by storm
sewer. Generally, private utilities have been placed underground
along along Vernon Avenue, but remain above ground in most other
portions of the area.
D. Traffic - Circulation
Vernon Avenue, which serves as a major feeder to Highway
100, provides the prinicipal retail - commerical orientation for
the area. Interlachen Boulevard provides access to the area from
northwestern Edina.
Average daily traffic volumes for Grandview Area streets
are illustrated on Exhibit 7. Vernon Avenue which carries
approximately 15,000 vehicles per day serves as the principal
artery through the area and is also the main orientation for
retail commericial uses in the area. Arcadia Avenue and Eden
Aveue provide secondary orientation of commercial - office uses.
E. Existing Plans
The City's Comprehensive Plan 1980 states that the
Grandview Area exhibits signs of "blight, inappropriate land use,
and non - conforming uses ". One of the Comprehensive Plan's
policies recommends that a detailed study of the area be
undertaken to determine the feasibility of a public redevelopment
OULFV
�k `�1 f `t �� '� � �7 n �'i ¢ tt t•�„ E ass ;: � �►�, , ;� '�''� i
ri
"1
rl
Now
-
`'a
a..e _ t
tzz
Palo
4
i r ;: L �� Ate, x • 3 �'r t
t �► `1 c � �4 r'r � , t��, - 11 % yi Y ;yr" Y{
January 1984 Grandview Area ExHiBi-r ,
Traffic Study
project.
The Plan also contains the following policies relative to
the Grandview Area:
* Encourage the re -use of obsolete or under utilized
commerical and industrial properties for multiple residential
purposes.
* Discourage the further extension of commercial uses
along Vernon Avenue.
* Encourage the intensification of residential uses in
the Grandview Area.
The Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan also
contains the following general policies relating to commercial
uses :
* Cooperate with commercial district owners seeking to
improve circulation and off - street parking in smaller commerial
areas.
* Eliminate non - conforming land uses.
* Encourage redevelopment of under utilized parcels.
* Prevent strip commercial areas.
II. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT
A. Land Use
Land use relationships in the Grandview Area have changed
many times over the years. These changes have caused some
obsolete land uses in the district as well as parcels that do not
allow efficient and logical development or redevelopment.
The growth of Jerry's Supermarket and other retail uses
in the central portion of the plan area has caused the complex of
industrial buildings located west of the railroad tracks to
become inappropriate in their present location because of access
problems and their proximity to retail commercial uses. The
Biltmore Motel once a thriving business has become obsolete due
to its lack of exposure to a major highway.
The School District maintains its bus storage facility
adjacent to Eden Avenue, south of Jerry's Supermarket. The use
of this site and the condition of the buildings create a
blighting influence in the area. The bus garage is extremely
non - conforming with the Planned Industrial District (PID) of the
City's Zoning Ordinance. Building and parking setbacks,
construction and materials, lot area and landscaping are among
the problems with this site.
The Super America station, a doctor's office and a car
wash are uses located westerly of the school bus site. The car
wash is a non - conforming transitional use. It remains from an
ealier partial redevelopment of the site that saw a restaurant
converted to a doctor's office. The resulting division of the
property left the car wash with a narrow, irregular parcel with
frontage on two streets. The site is non - conforming; it does not
relate well to adjacent uses and is a visual blight on the area.
The commercial - office uses located south of Eden Avenue
in the vicinity of Eden Circle are generally in good condition
and conforming, but they could encounter accessibility problems
if intersection improvements occur nearby. Lewis Engineering,
Kunz Oil, and the Soo Line Railroad property, are all zoned PID.
The Railroad property is currently vacant. The property has
remained vacant for some time after the site was cleared and
graded. Redevelopment of this site will be very difficult due to
the long and irregular shape of the site. Kunz Oil and Lewis
Engineering sites are non - conforming with regard to building and
parking setbacks, exterior building materials and landscaping.
An additional blighting influence is the large amount of outdoor
materials storage on the Lewis Engineering site.
Under utilized sites, obsolete uses, and an inadequate
street pattern are problems existing in the northeasterly portion
of area which is occupied by Jerry Leonard's Clothing, a small
office building and the Biltmore Bowl. The area is chopped up by
street pattern which severely limits the full utilization of all
the properties. A public street separates the bowling alley from
its parking lot. Due to lack of convenient access and visibility
the bowling alley has become an obsolete use.
The area north and west of Vernon Avenue is comprised of
a variety of commercial and multi- family uses that back up to
existing single dwelling unit neighborhoods. In many cases the
separation between single dwelling uses and multi - family and
commercial uses is inadequate due to proximity of lack of
sufficient buffering. This part of the area shares some
characteristics of strip commercial development.
In the central, commercial, portion of--the area there is
a parking shortage. The amount of parking has not kept pace with
the growth of retail activity in the area. In addition, due to
the grades and arrangement of parking facilities the efficiency
of the parking is reduced, especially in the winter months. The
existing arrangement of streets, buildings, and the railroad
right of way makes the provision of more an improved parking very
difficult.
Structurally substandard buildings and buildings found
to require substantial renovation or clearance to remedy problems
such as incompatible land uses, overcrowding of buildings on the
land and obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or
EXHIBIT 8
GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVEOPMENT PLAN
Problem Summary
0/
�o
0
w. �—
m
rN
/
� 2
� •N
0
0
0 aD
C
I`
J
P� e
a
N
b
E
/ggg\
V
Q
non- conforming uses, obsolete buildings,
inadequate street layout, and incompatible
land uses
substandard buildings
traffic- circulation problems
conversion are shown on Exhibit 8.
,B. Traffic
As identified in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ",
prepared by BRW, Inc., most traffic problems in the district
occur along Vernon Avenue. Arcadia Avenue, a north -south
connection between Vernon Avenue /West 50th Stret and Eden Avenue,
and Summit Avenue were other identified traffic concerns in the
area. The Traffic Study identified five issue areas within the
Plan area. Summarized below are the problems associated with
each issue area (Exhibit 9):
* Issue Area One.
Confusing and difficult intersection of Vernon Avenue and
Eden Avenue /West 53rd Street.
Access to redevelopment of the Motel with multi - family
residential.
Access to the Sherwood Road neighborhood.
Through traffic in the Grandview area.
* Issue Area Two.
Access to and from Summit Avenue to Vernon Avenue and
Interlachen Boulevard.
ML
19
Ll
,21L.4
.4ftl
- irt
...........
1 ,
Pilo
Tr
4W . D2
t jaw
f i
%
of
ILI
OWA '
Al
lZ
7.
OL
r.
January 1984 Grandview Area
Traffic Study EXHIBIT 9
* Issue Area Three.
Through traffic capacity and the need for exclusive
turning lanes at the intersection of Vernon and Interlachen.
Excess speed of traffic exiting southbound Highway 100 to
westbound Vernon Avenue
Avenue.
* Issue Area Four.
The effect of closing the Arcadia Avenue access to Vernon
* Issue Area Five.
Need to limit the number of uncontrolled access points to
Vernon Avenue.
Lack of major access point to shopping center.
III. Redevelopment Plan
The problem assessment and the problem summary (Exhibit
8) support the conclusion that certain redevelopment activities
in the Plan area are warranted. These problems cannot be
corrected by private enterprise or regulation alone. In order to
correct problems identified herein and to acheive redevelopment
in the plan area in a timely manner, and in conformance with the
Land Use Plan, a tax increment plan should be established and
certain tax increment projects be undertaken.
Based upon the need demonstrated in the inventory and
problem assessment, the following goals and objectives are
established for the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan:
1. To promote development and redevelopment in a manner
consistent with the policies set forth in the City's
Comprehensive Plan 1980.
2. To promote and secure development and redevelopment
in a manner that allows the most logical and efficient
arrangement and intensity of land uses.
3. To improve the efficiency of the street and roadway
system and to reduce traffic conflicts and automobile
pedestrian conflicts through the implementation of the
recommended changes, set forth in the Grandview Area
Traffic Study, as modified.
4. To promote and secure the retention of existing jobs
and to gain new employment opportunities in the area.
5. To promote and secure development and redevelopment
in a manner that will have minimal adverse impact on the
environment.
6. To promote and secure certain public improvements,
including public parking facilities.
7. To undertake certain land acquisition, parcel
assembly and parcel disposition necessary to eliminate
certain substandard and non- conforming..uses and
buildings, to assemble logical, conforming and more
efficient building sites.
8. To eliminate threats to the quality of ground water
supplies through the elimination of existing on -site
sewage disposal systems.
9. To promote the reuse of obsolete land uses on the
periphery of the district for multi - family residential
uses in accordance with the Land Use Plan.
10. To promote and secure the redevelopment of non-
conforming land uses and substandard buildings in a way
C
which provides a clearer definition of 1 -and uses and more
efficient utilization of parcels.
11. To promote and secure increased landscaping on
private property and public rights of way to improve the
asthetics, provide identity for the commerical area and
improve transitions along the area's perimeter.
Land Use
The Land Use Plan emphasizes the redevelopment of non-
conforming uses and substandard buildings in the Grandview Area.
In addition, the Plan anticipates that certain infill development
and redevelopment will occur. This development and redevelopment
should be principally accomplished privately in a manner
consistent with the needs of the surrounding neighborhood and the
City as a whole.
Public acquisition of private property for redevelopment
is to be kept at an absolute minimum. However, in some cases
public acquisition, clearance, and parcel assembly may be the
only efficient and expedient approach to desired redevelopment.
This may be the case in the industrial area south of Eden Avenue.
In addition, small amounts of additional right of way will be
necessary to accomplish planned street improvements.
The Land Use Plan anticipates the following net additions
in floor area to Grandview Plan Area:
Commerical /Retail
Office
Office Warehouse
Residential
Parking and Circulation
20,000 square feet
190,000 square feet
65,000 square feet
82 Units
The BRW, Inc., "Traffic Study ", incorporated herein by
reference, identifies five issue areas in the Grandview area.
The major recommendations of the study to be implemented by the
Plan are summarized below:
1. Created three major, signalzed intersections along
Vernon Avenue; one at Link Road; one as the major entrance /exit
for Jerry's foods, First Bank and Union Oil; and an improved
intersection with turn lanes at the Vernon/ Interlachen
intersection.
2. Close several access points and driveways along
Vernon Avenue to improve traffic flow and discourage through
traffic in surrounding single dwelling areas.
3. Close the Vernon /Sherwood /Eden Avenue intersection
and rely on the new Link Road intersection.
�S
4
x
:may
r
'r -ic�i %�`'' ,►. ,• t ,..+ i _` � ,1 � s'e'Y'? � J � ��,yc�t
•,,; :, ,'' � ... ' ..�.. �Y s•t �.�.'" �: �' i � �.' cam'
W4
It
IL
gs
u '* ��yj "'�� err �„/f fi`�.:. ±L''�+ � ';r
X
/_ ^ —�%ry_y r �. -� ip- 4 �• +�r-- >set^�.'A°yry�.Sa -^.k aCtie. s `.7r t.
An s �y rjs• a 4 }� n y� iti� °yY f
4 • � * � w aR � ,� ,c ; ��, a, : L,� _ '- "��,:i S - �4 � �.rs '~ !''r S°�di ',_�(�p.,�u� .�.
'�, .. ' '•
.� x f 1
iVMIA' Z
CL
! w
a� ;,}��: �•�"°�� '�-• ..c -�� mss•,- :t• {� 7":t �..ir' ... +Y ,S'
Ar
VL• "ri .'iil .: •SL x'23 �.r�
January 1984 Grandview Area EXHIBIT 10
Traffic Study !�
.e ;a,.ta \t�`i.- �a •• r;e i � t-: { � ..-.t zr S:. ; SS + rr@ s. ;•,�.'
W.
A Al
A
r'i
lax
VFW I 1 � U
• =i.• Y 'mss►- S5. :�. _ y°7 taN.�� �r� y -i i
Ar
N11
I°r�d %S.
New
wft
' � •'�yF •_.. ri + � � + ' � � y � ' '� }p '. war ♦ �
A rC .,u'I t� _v .^ -yam - -i. q `t R' y (:'( "1 i�d• ?�f ' ` 4�i Et,
wr
f
January 1984 Grandview Area Exhibit 11
Traffic Study I �
0
4. Close the Arcadia to Vernon Access, redo the south-
bound off ramp from Highway 100 and widen the bridge over the
railroad tracks.
Exhibit 10, taken from the BRW Traffic Study, summarizes
the proposed roadway improvements for the Grandview Area.
All recommended improvements are to be constructed as
proposed with the exception of the link from Arcadia Avenue to
the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. In
order to create a more unified development site in the vicinity
of the bowling alley the bridge will be moved south and the link
to Arcadia will be realigned to the southerly portion of the
bowling alley property as shown on Exhibit 11.
In the central portion of the district on parcels now
occupied by the City storage facility buildings, a parking ramp
containing approximately 400 spaces will be constructed. The
ramp will be constructed in two phases with approximately 200
spaces in each phase.
Urban Design - Landscaping
All devlopment, redevelopment and street improvements in
the Plan Area should address the following standards:
* Screening and buffering non - residential uses from
surrounding single family neighborhoods.
* Improved perimeter and boulevard landscaping.
* Improved screening and landscaping of parking lots.
* Existing above ground utilities should be placed
underground whenever possible in connection with development,
redevelopment and street improvements.
Relocation
The Plan does not anticipate that there will be any
acquisition of private property or relocation of persons or
businesses until at least Phase II Redevelopment Project. It is
the intent of the H.R.A. that current owners of properties
designated for redevelopment be party to efforts to redevelop
their properties. If some or all of the owners of the subject
property are unwilling or unable to redevelop their property and
the H.R.A. must acquire and dispose of the property, the H.R.A.
will comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal
Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970, and all applicable Minnesota State
Statutes. The H.R.A. will provide staff for on -site relocation
counseling for tenants and information on their rights relative
to relocation services and payments.
Project Costs and Methods of Financing
The gross cost of public improvements and facilities
including right of way acquisition, but not including acquisition
for redevelopment purposes is estimated to be approximately
$4,500,000.
It is proposed that the public redevelopment cost should
be paid by the issuance of general obligation bonds of the City
of Edina, upon request of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority
(H.R.A.) as projects are undertaken, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Chapter 462, and Sections 273.71 to 273.86.
All tax increments received by the H.R.A. with respect to
Redevelopment Projects, a-_n d all revenues received from lands in
Project Areas while owned by the HRA, shall be pledged and
appropriated by it for the payment of the principal of and
interest on said general obligation bonds to be issued'by the
City in aid of the project. Such pledge shall be made by written
agreement between the H.R.A. and the City Council, and filed with
the County auditor.
It is currently contemplated that a certain amount of the
gross cost, up to 20 percent of •$4.,500,000 will be received from
the City. The City will obtain the funds to pay this cost by
r
the levy of special assessments against properties specially
benefited by the provision of contemplated public improvements
and facilities.
Initial Redevelopment Project
The initial phase of the redevelopment is based upon the
need to finance a public cost of $2,000,000 through the sale of
general obligation bonds. The public costs of the initial phase
are as follows:
* Construction of signalized intersection at Link Road
and Vernon Avenue.
* Close intersection of Eden Avenue, Sherwood Road and
Vernon Avenue.
* Demolish the City storage facility.
* Construction of two level parking facility on storage
facility site.
The increased taxable value creating the tax increment
necessary to make principal and interest payments on the bond
issue will be provided by the following development and
redevelopment in the project area.
f
* Construction of 8 townhouse units.
* Construction of 77 condominium units
* Construction of approximately 70,000 square feet of
office space.
* Construction of approxmately 8,000 square feet of
retail space.
•
� � r
EXHIBIT A
The Project Area includes the 29 following described parcels' in the
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota:
Quarter/
Parcel I.D.
Section
Range
Township
Quarter Sect.
Parcel
A
28
117
21
31
0017
B
28
117
21
31
0021
C
28
117
21
31
0022
D
28
117
21
31
0028
E
28
117
21
31
0029
F
28
117
21
31
0030
G
28
117
21
31
0031
H
28
117
21
31
0032
1
28
117
21
31
0043
J
28
117
21
31
0044
K
28
117
21
31
0046
L
28
117
21
31
0047
M
28
117
21
31
0048
N
28
117
21
31
0051
O
28
117
21
31
0053
P
28
117
21
31
0054
Q
28
117
21
31
0055
R
28
117
21
33
0018
S
28
117
21
34
0002
T
28
117
21
34
0004
U
28
117
21
34
0005
V
28
117
21
34
0011
W
28
117
21
34
0017
X
28
117
21
34
0018
Y
28
117
21
34
0019
Z
28
117
21
31l
0020
AA
28
117
21
34
0022
BB
28
117
21
34
0025
cc
28
117
21
34
0026
EXHIBIT A - Continued
Quarter/
Parcel I.D.
Section
Range
Township
Quarter Section
Parcel
D D
28
117
21
31
0007
EE
28
117
21
31
0014
F
28
117
21
31
0015
G G
28
117
21
31
0016
H H
28
117
21
31
0027
II
28
117
21
31
0028
JJ
28
117
21
31
0029
K K
28
117
21
31
0033
LL
28
117
21
32
0013
MM
28
117
21
32
0014
N N
28
117
21
33
0004
00
28
117
21
33
0007
pp
28
117
21
33
0009
Q Q
28
117
21
33
0010
R R
28
117
21
33
0011
SS
28
117
21
33
0012
T T
28
117
21
33
0013
U U
28
117
21
33
0017
VV
28
117
21
33
0031
WW
28
117
21
33
0032
X X
28
117
21
33
0033
YY
28
117
21
34
0021,
� � 4
GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
Redevelopment Project No. 1
�i
v u
Li
..► 50 St.
IN
r
I
i
i
i
I
CRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
��i�i�i�i`•
►�i�i�is'
►�i�i�i�i�i�
0
I•
50 St.
REDEVELOPMENT AREA
�'.•.•.•:•;
Residential
......
Commerical /Office
Industrial
;' ?';
Public
GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN
PURSUANT TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
of
THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
i
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
A. Statement of Authority
B. Definitions
C. Statement of Need
D. Statement of Objectives
II. Redevelopment Project
A. Description of Project
1. Project Area
2. Conditions of Blight
3. Redevelopment Activities
B. Preparation of Property
C. Relocation
III. Financing of Public Redevelopment Cost
A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost
1. Estimated Total Public Cost
2. Capital Proceeds of Project
3. Public Redevelopment Cost
B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost
1. In General
2. Issuance of Bonds
3. Bond Terms
4. Security for and Payment of Bonds
C. Determination and Use of Tax Increment
1. Tax Increment Financing District
2. Original Assessed Value
3. Adjustment to Original Assessed Value
4. Assured Value; Captured Assessed Value
5. Duration of District
6. Payment and Discharge of Bonds; Use of
Tax Increment
7. Use of Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment
D. Impact of Tax Increment Financing
IV. Implementation of Project and Plan
A. In General
B. Cooperation Agreement
V. Amendments to Plan
VI. Exhibits
Exhibit A - Legal description of tax parcels or
portions thereof included in
Project Area and Tax Increment
Financing District
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Statement of Authority. This Grandview Tax
Increment Financing Plan Plan relates to Grandview
Redevelopment Project No. 1 of the HRA. The Project is
established by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the
City Council of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 462, and this Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan is
approved and adopted by such bodies pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 273.71 to 273.86.
B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined
in this Section shall for all purposes of this Grandview Tax
Increment Financing Plan, have the meanings given to them in
this Section:
"Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of all
taxable property in the District as determined from time to
time pursuant to state law.
"Bonds" means the Tax Increment Bonds and any other
obligations issued by the City or the HRA, the principal of and
interest on which is payable in whole or in part out of the Tax
Increment, to finance or provide for the payment of the Public
Redevelopment Cost of the Project.
"Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions,
ordinances, trust indentures or other documents.under which any
Bonds are sold, issued or secured.
"Capital Proceeds of the Project" means all amounts
received or to be received by the City or the HRA from the sale
or lease of property in the Project Area.
"Captured Assessed Value" means that portion of the
Assessed Value in excess of the Original Assessed Value as
adjusted from time to time, if any.
"City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
"District" means the Grandview Tax Increment Financing
District established pursuant to the Grandview Tax Increment
Financing Plan containing the land area included in the Project
Area.
"Grandview Redevelopment Plan" means the Grandview
Area Redevelopment Plan as approved and amended from time to
time by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to law.
"Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan ".means this
Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Project as
approved and amended from time to time by the HRA and the City
Council pursuant to law.
"HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in
and for the City of Edina.
"Municipal Storage Facility" means the storage
facility of the City located on Parcels B and C described in
Exhibit A.
"Original Assessed Value" means the Assessed Value of
all taxable property in the District as most recently
determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of
Minnesota, as of the date of certification thereof by the
County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76,
or as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76.
"Outstanding" when used with respect to Tax Increment
Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed and
prepaid or discharged in accordance with their terms or the
terms of a Bond Resolution.
"Parcel" means a lot, parcel, tract or plat of land
comprising a single unit for purposes of assessment for real
estate purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Grandview
Tax Increment Financing Plan.
"Plan" means the Grandview Redevelopment Plan and this
Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan.
"Parking Facilities" means the parking ramp containing
approximately 4 parking levels and 400 parking spaces to be
constructed in two phases by the HRA on Parcels B and C
described in Exhibit A.
"Project" means Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1,
and-the Redevelopment Activities described in Section II -A -3
hereof to be undertaken with respect thereto.
"Project Area" means the.land area or Parcels
described in Exhibit A to this Plan.
"Public Redevelopment Cost" means the total amount
expended and to be expended by the City and /or the HRA on
Redevelopment Activities, less the Capital Proceeds of the
Project.
MPM
"Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or
to be taken by the HRA in establishing, implementing and
carrying out the Project and the Plan and by the City in aid of
the Project pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited
to, the activities described in Section II -A -3 hereof.
"Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem
taxes levied on all taxable property in the District from time
to time which is allocable to the Captured Assessed Value of
such property.
"Tax Increment Bonds" means the approximately
$4,500,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds to be issued
in one or more series by the City or the HRA to finance all or
a portion of the Public Redevelopment Cost.
C. Statement of Need. There is a need for
redevelopment of the Project Area which will result in the
increase of employment opportunities for residents of the City,
the increase of the value of property subject to taxation by
the City and other local government units, and the increase of
general economic activity in the City, all of which will reduce
unemployment, correct inadequate street layout and reduce
traffic hazards, provide necessary public parking facilities,
improve living conditions, promote desirable redevelopment of
land a portion of which is presently occupied by buildings
which contain defects in structural elements or a combination
of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities,
including, access to public sewer, light and ventilation and
fire protection, layout, which defects or deficiencies are of
total significance to justify substantial renovation or
clearance, and a portion of which is presently occupied by
buildings which require substantial renovation or clearance
because of conditions such as inadequate street layout, unusual
grade conditions, incompatible uses or land use relationships
and obsolesence to the extent such buildings are not suitable
for improvement or conversion at a cost reasonably related to
the public purpose to be served without major residential
clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of
beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment,
prevent the emergence of blighted property and areas, and
encourage and enhance the general health and welfare of the
residents -of the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken
by the HRA and the City with respect to the Project are
necessary to secure the redevelopment of the property included
in the Project Area, at this time and in a manner which will
best meet those needs.
D. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to
be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and
-3-
carrying out the Project and in financing of the Public
Redevelopment Cost thereof, as specified herein, are to meet
the needs specified in paragraph C:
a. by promoting and securing the prompt redevelopment
of the property in the Project Area in a manner consistent
with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a
minimal adverse impact on the environment, a portion of
which property is not now in productive use;
b. by promoting and securing additional employment
opportunities for residents of the City and surrounding
area, thereby improving living standards and reducing
unemployment;
c. by reducing traffic hazards;
d. by promoting and securing necessary public parking
facilities;
e. by securing the increase of property subject to
taxation by the City, Hennepin County and Independent
School District No. 273, and other local government taxing
jurisdictions, in order to better enable such entities to
pay for public improvements and governmental services and
programs required to be provided by them; and
f. by undertaking and providing moneys for the
payment of the cost of Redevelopment Activities in or
adjacent to the Project Area, which are necessary to serve
the Project Area and for the orderly and beneficial
development of the Project Area and adjacent areas of the
City.
II. REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
A. Description of Project.
1. Project Area.. The Project Area comprises
approximately 60 acres of property located in the City. The
property identification number of each Parcel included in the
Project Area are as set forth in the attached Exhibit A which
comprises -part of this Plan.
The Project Area comprises 51 Parcels designated A
through YY, inclusive.
2. Conditions of Blight. The Project Area is
blighted by virtue of inadequate street layout resulting in
traffic hazards, a shortage of public parking facilities
-4-
'necessary for the commercial enterprises located in the Project
Area, the location of buildings on Parcels B, C, F, G, H, R, U,
X and Y described in Exhibit A which are structurally
substandard because they contain defects in structural elements
or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and
facilities, including, access to public sewer and water, light
and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress,
layout and conditions of interior partitions, or similar
factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total
significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance and
by buildings on Parcels A, I, J, K, L', M, S, T, V, W, Z, AA, BB
and CC described in Exhibit A which require substantial
renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing
conditions as incompatible uses or land use relationships,
overcrowding of buildings on the Land and obsolete buildings
not suitable for improvement or conversion. However, the
Project Area is potentially useful and valuable for
redevelopment which would contribute to the general health,
safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The Project
Area will not be reasonably available for redevelopment by
private enterprise, or redeveloped by private enterprise, in
the foreseeable future, unless the blighting conditions thereof
are removed. The City and the HRA can remove, or cause or
encourage other parties to remove, such blighting conditions,
and to redevelop the Project Area by the razing of the
Municipal Storage Facility and constructing on that site the
Parking Facilities and by constructing necessary street
improvements, and in connection with such street improvements
acquiring necessary rights -of -way, by jointly exercising the
powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose.
3. Redevelopment Activities. The Project includes
the following Redevelopment Activities by the City or the HRA,
(a) the making of studies and planning and informational
activities relating to the Project and the Plan; (b) the razing
of the Municipal Storage Facilities and the construction on
such site of the Parking Facilities in two phases; (c) the
construction of necessary street improvements and acquiring of
necessary rights -of -way in.connection with a comprehensive
redesign of the roadway system in the Project Area, including
new entrances to the shopping center in the Project Area, a new
intersection, new approaches and connections and elimination of
certain intersections, access points and driveways; (d) the
issuance of Tax Increment Bonds to finance all or part of the
Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project; and (e) the use of
the Tax Increment derived from the Project Area to pay the debt
service on such Tax Increment Bonds, or otherwise pay the
Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project.
-5-
No contracts have been entered into for Redevelopment
Activities by the City or the HRA.
At this time the City and the HRA reasonably expect
that the following private developments are expected to take
place in the Project Area:
a. The existing Biltmore Hotel located on Parcel R
will be razed and a condominium project containing
seventy -seven units will be constructed on that site in two
phases. The first phase is expected to contain twenty -nine
units and be completed in Spring, 1986 and the second phase
is expected to contain the remaining forty -eight units and
be completed in Spring, 1987.
b. Three existing single family homes located on
Parcels F, G and H will be razed and a townhouse project
containing eight units will be constructed on that site.
c. The existing commercial and office uses located on
Parcels P and Q will be expanded by the addition of
approximately 36,000 square feet of floor area.
Construction is expected to commence in Spring 1985.
d. The existing commercial and office building
located on Parcels I and J wil•1 be razed and an office
building containing approximately 50,000 square feet will
be constructed on that site.
B. Preparation of Property For Parking Facilities.
The Municipal Storage Facility will have to be razed or removed
and necessary public utility connections, street repairs and
other public amenities will need to be provided in connection
with the construction on that site of the Parking Facilities.
C. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have
to be relocated as a result of the Project.
III. FINANCING OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COST
A. Determination of Public Redevelopment Cost.
1. Estimated Total Public Cost. The total costs
expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or
indirectly, in carrying out the Project are estimated to be as
follows:
a. Razing of Municipal Storage Facility $ 50,000
b. Construction of Parking Facilities 2,500,000
c. Street Improvements (including acquisi- 1,200,000
tion of necessary rights -of -way)
d. Capitalized Interest 560,000
e. Legal, Fiscal and Administrative 100,000
f. Bond Discount 90,000
Total Public Cost of Project $4,500,000
The items of cost and the amounts thereof shown above are
estimated to be necessary based upon the best engineering,
legal and other information now available. It is anticipated
that the items of cost and the amounts thereof shown on each
category above may decrease or increase, but that the Total
Public Cost of the Project will not exceed the amount shown
above. The City and the HRA reserve the right to pay the cost
of any element of the Total Public Cost of the Project from the
proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds herein authorized, or
directly from Tax Increments derived from the Project Area.
2. Capital Proceeds of Project. There are not
expected to be any Capital Proceeds of the Project, comprising
the cash proceeds of the sale of property in the Project Area
owned by the HRA to third parties.-
3. Public Redevelopment Cost. The Public
Redevelopment Cost of the Project, comprising the total costs
expected to be incurred by the City and the HRA, directly or
indirectly, in carrying out the Project, less the Capital
Proceeds thereof, is expected to be $4,500,000.
B. Payment of Public Redevelopment Cost.
1. In General. The entire Public Redevelopment Cost
of the Project will be paid from Tax Increment to be derived
from the Project Area, either directly or indirectly by payment
of debt service on the bonds issued to finance such Public
Redevelopment Cost and from any special assessments which may
be levied against the property benefited by the Parking
Facilities or street improvements.
2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that
the Public Redevelopment Cost of the Project will be financed
by the issuance of Tax Increment Bonds in the principal amount
of $4,500,000. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the
City or the HRA under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
475, and Sections 273.71 to 273.78.
-7-
3. Bond Terms. The terms of the Bonds are expected
to be as set forth below; however, the right is reserved to
adjust any and all terms of the Bonds to secure the best
interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire
principal of and interest on the Bonds will be paid when due
from the sources specified in paragraph 4.
The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more
series, in the aggregate principal amount of $4,500,000, will
mature serially over a period of approximately twenty -five (25)
years from the date receipt by the HRA of the first Tax
Increment from the District, commencing on or after June 1,
1988, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will
bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to
maturity, payable semiannually commencing in 1985, and will be
sold at public sale.
4. Security For And Payment Of Bonds. The Tax
Increment Bonds will be general obligations of the City or'the
HRA, and the full faith and credit and the taxing powers of the
City or the HRA will be pledged for their payment. The
principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds will be
payable from the Tax Increments to be derived from the Project
Area by the HRA, from any special assessments which may be
levied against the property benefited by the Parking Facilities
or street improvements and from ad valorem taxes to be levied
on all taxable property in the City, but if necessary for the
payment of additional ad valorem taxes will be required by law
to be levied on all taxable property in the City, which taxes
will not be subject to any limitation as to rate and amount.
C. Determination and Use of Tax Increment.
1. Tax Increment Financing District. Seventy percent
(70 %) of the Parcels in the Project Area are occupied by
buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and at
least twenty percent (20 %) of the buildings in the Project Area
contain defects in structural elements or a combination of
deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and
ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout
and condition of interior partitions or similar factors, which
defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to
justify substantial renovation or.clearance, and at least an
additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings in the Project
Area require substantial renovation or clearance in order to
remove such existing conditions as inadeqaute street layout,
incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of
buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density,
obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion.
am
'Therefore, the Project comprises and is designated as a "Tax
Increment Financing District" and is a "Redevelopment
District," as defined in and pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 273.71 to 273.78; and is hereinafter called "the
District."
2. Original Assessed Value. The Assessed Value of
all taxable property in the District as most recently certified
by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being
the certification made in 1983 with respect to the Assessed
Value of 'such property as of January '1, 1983, for taxes payable
in 1984 is estimated to be $4,418,948, which amount is expected
to be the Original Assessed Value of such property.
3. Adjustment to Original Assessed Value. Under
Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 1, the Hennepin
County Auditor is required to certify, in each year after
certification of the Original Assessed Value, the amount by
which the Original Assessed Value has increased or decreased as
a result of a change in tax exempt status of the Parcels in the
District; and is directed to add to the Original Assessed Value
an amount equal to the Assessed Value of the Parcels becoming
taxable as most recently assessed pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 273.18 or, if that assessment was made more
than one year prior to the date of title transfer rendering the
Parcel taxable, as determined by the assessor at the time of
such transfer.
4. Assessed Value; Captured Assessed Value. It is
estimated that the Assessed Value of all taxable property in
the District, upon completion of the redevelopment thereof by
the HRA and the City in accordance with the Plan and the
completion of the private redevelopment expected to occur
described in Section II -A -3 hereof and termination of the
District, will be approximately $9,414,000, and that
accordingly the Captured Assessed Value thereof will be
$4,995,000.
5. Duration of District. It is estimated that the
duration of the District will be not more than twenty -five (25)
years from the date of receipt by the HRA of the first Tax
Increment form the District.
6. Payment and Discharge of Bonds; Use of Tax
Increment. The principal of and interest on the Bonds will be
payable solely from the Tax Increments to be received by the
HRA with respect to the District, from any special assessments
which may be levied against the property benefited by the
Parking Facilities or street improvements, and from certain
proceeds of the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest
mm
earnings thereon. At such time as the Bonds have.been paid or
discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution authorizing
therein issuance and all other costs of the Project and any
additional project undertaken pursuant to this Plan have been
paid, the HRA will notify the Hennepin County Director,of
Property Taxation of such fact and will direct the Hennepin
County Director of Property Taxation thereafter to pay to all
local government units having authority to levy taxes on
taxable property in the District including the City, all ad
valorem taxes received with respect thereto, in the manner then
provided by law.
7. Use of Captured Assessed Value and Tax Increment.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.76, Subdivision 2,
the City and the HRA hereby determine that they will use 1000
of the Captured Assessed Value of taxable property located in
the District, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived from
the District, for the entire duration of the District.
D. Impact of Tax Increment Financing. It is
estimated that the impact of the establishment of the District
and the implementation of the Plan and undertaking of the
Project will be as follows:
The local government units other than the City which
are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in
which the District is located, are Independent School District
No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan
area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the
Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports
Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the
local government units).
After the establishment and during the continuance of
the District, as a result of the establishment of the Project
and the implementation of the Plan and private development in
the Project Area, there will be an increase in the Assessed
Value of taxable property 'in the District subject to taxation
by such local government units. It is estimated that during
the continuance of the District, as a result of the
establishment of the Project and the implementation of the Plan
and private development in the Project Area, there.will also be
an increase in the Assessed Value.of taxable property outside
the District but within the City and such local government
units. Upon termination of the District there will be a large
increase in the Assessed Value of taxable property in the City
and such local government units, and thus in the general tax
base of the City and all other taxing jursidictions in which
the District is located.
-10-
During the continuance of the District a.portion of
the increase in the Assessed Value of taxable property in the
District will be subject to taxation by other local government
units pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473F.
IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT AND PLAN
A. In General. The Project and the Plan shall be
implemented on behalf of the City and the City Council and the
HRA. The HRA or the City shall sell and issue Tax Increment
Bonds in the amount needed to finance'the Public Redevelopment
Cost of the Project, and shall use so much of the Bond proceeds
available to pay the Public Redevelopment Cost as is necessary.
B. Cooperation Agreement. If necessary, the City and
the HRA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement for the
purpose of specifying the duties and responsibilities of each
with respect to the implementation of the Project and the Plan,
and the application of the Tax Increments to be derived from
the District.
V. AMENDMENTS TO PLAN
The City and the HRA reserve the right to alter the
Project and amend or modify the Plan by their joint action,
subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action.
The City and the HRA specifically reserve the right to
increase the size of the District, the Public Redevelopment
Cost of the Project and the amount of Bonds to be issued to
finance such Cost, by following the procedures specified in
Section 273.74, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to
be necessary for the paying of additional Public Redevelopment
Costs.
-11-
EXHIBIT A
The Project Area includes the 29 following described parcels in the
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota:
Parcel I.D.
Section
Ranae
Township
Quarter/
Quarter Sect.
Parcel
A
28
117
21
31
0017
B
28
117
21
31
0021
C
28
117
21 .:
31
0022
D
28
117
21
31
0028
E
28
117
21
31
0029
F
28
117
21
31
0030
G
28
117
21
31
0031
H
28
117
21
31
0032
I
28
117
21
31
0043
J
28
117.
21
31
0044
K
28
117
21
31
0046
L
28
117
21
31
0047
M
28
117
21
31
0048
N
28
117
21
31
0051
0
28
117
21
31' _
0053
P
28
117
21
31
0054
Q
28
117
21
31
0055
R
28
117
21
33
0018
S.
28
117
21
34
0002
•..
T
28
117
21
34
0004
U
28
117-
21
34
0005
V
28
117.
21
34
0011
W
28
117
21
34
0017
X
28
117
21
34
0018
Y
28
117
21
34
0019
Z
28
117
21
34
0020
AA
28
117
21
34
0022
BB
28
117
21
34
0025
cc
28
117
21
34
0026
EXHIBIT
A - Continued
Quarter/
Parcel I.D. Section
Rance
Township
Quarter Section
Parcel
D.D
28
117
21
31
0007
EE
28
117
21
31
0014
FF
28
117
21
31
0015
G G
28
117
21
31
0016
H H
28
117
21
31
0027
II
28
117
21
31
0028
JJ
28
117
21
31
0029
K K
28
117
21
31
'0033
LL
28
117
21
32
0013
MM
28
117
21
32
0014
NN
28
117
21
33
0004
00
28
117
21
33
0007
PP
28
117
21
33
0009
Q Q
28
117
21
33
0010
RR
28
117
21
33
0011
SS
28
117
21
33
TT
28
117
21
33
_0012
0013 —
U U
28
117
21
33
0017
VV
28
117
21
33
0031
•WW
28
117
21
33
0032
XX
28
117
21
.33
0033
YY
28
117
21
34
0021
s
Members present:
Members absent:
Others present:
SECTION A
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JUNE 12, 1984
9:00 A.M.
Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Gordon Hughes
Lois Coon
Craig Swanson
Alison Fuhr
Linda Farrell, 5700 Blake Road
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
1. Review of Hennepin County plans for capacity and safety improvements at
Xerxes Avenue and West 66th Street.
Request made by Edina City engineers.
ACTION TAKEN:
A Hennepin County plan called for a continuous median along West 66th
Street in the area of York Avenue and Xerxes Avenue South. Commercial
developments, notably the Carlson Company, disagreed with their concept
and had independent engineers draw up an alternative for review by
Hennepin County, Richfield and Edina. The Committee reviewed the revised
plan and discussed its impact. Most changes occur within the City of
Richfield. Of main concern to Edina is the safety of West 66th Street
at Xerxes Avenue and entry /egress to the Perkins Restaurant.
The proposal establishes a median along West 66th Street between York
Avenue and Xerxes Avenue and vacates Xerxes Avenue north of West 66th
Street (see attached diagram). Left turn movements to enter West 66th
Street from Xerxes Avenue and through movements on Xerxes Avenue are no
longer possible and will significantly enhance safety. Entry to the
Perkins Restaurant at 3101 West 66th Street will be permitted from both
eastbound and westbound West 66th Street. Egress from Perkins to westbound
West 66th Street will be the only affected traffic movement.
Mrs. Coon moved that the Committee recommend the Council support the
upgrade of West 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue provided that:
s
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
Page 2
June 12, 1984
• Through and left turn movements at Xerxes Avenue be prohibited.
• Entry to the Perkins Restaurant at 3101 West 66th Street be
maintained from both eastbound and westbound traffic.
Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
2. Request for signalization of the intersection of Vernon Avenue and
Blake Road.
Request to review made by the Edina City Council.
Continued from April 1984 meeting (see April 1984 Traffic Safety
Committee Minutes).
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reviewed for the Committee the previous Hennepin County
findings and described traffic volumes and accident histories of the
area. Highlights include:
• Warrants for signalization are met at Tracy Avenue.
• Warrants for signalization are met at Blake Road if a 20% reduction
is computed due to its accident history.
o Speed on Vernon Avenue may not be reduced by signalization.
Side street volume adjacent to signals will likely increase.
• Signalization would likely change the atmosphere of the roadway.
Additionally, from a local perspective:
• There are other similar sites in the City that may qualify for
signalization (see attached diagram).
• The City may want to consider a plan or priority list for signalization.
• Eligibility may exist for a percentage of the funding.
• Signalization would have a predictable impact on surrounding streets.
Mr. Hoffman reported the results of a "gap study" conducted on Vernon
Avenue at Blake Road. This study indicated sufficient "gaps" for pedestrian
traffic now exist to cross Vernon Avenue, however, few pedestrians were
noted.
Mr. Hoffman further described a signalization plan for the City of Edina.
Most signalization will be installed as a result of future development.
Vernon Avenue signalization at Tracy Avenue and Blake Road, as well as
• Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
Page 3
June 12, 1984
signalization along West 70th Street, will need to be acted upon
independently.
Mrs. Farrell and Mrs. Coon offered comments from the Citizens-Safety
Council which support Vernon Avenue signalization.
Mr. Swanson mentioned the need for community input on signalization.
Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee recommend signalization of Vernon
Avenue at Blake Road based on the meeting of warrants as reduced by the
accident history. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee recommend the signalization of Vernon
Avenue at Tracy Avenue based on the existence of warrants. Mr. Hughes
seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
NONE.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
1. Request for evaluation of the West 70th Street and Cornelia Drive
intersection.
Continued from February 1984 meetin (see February 1984 and April 1984
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes).
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman presented an Engineering Department response to West 70th.
Street which included:
• Maintenance of the four -way stop at West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive.
• Installation of a four -way stop at West 70th Street at West Shore Drive.
• The striping of through and turning lanes at the above intersections.
• The establishment of "No Parking" zones in conjunction with the above
intersections.
Mr. Swanson reported a Police Department perspective which was consistent
with the above report.
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
Page 4
June 12, 1984
Mr. Swanson moved that appropriate graphics of the changes be prepared
and individual invitations to formerly- interested persons be sent for
the purpose of review and action during the July Traffic Safety Committee
meeting. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
• rlATrlITT A. I 1 /finIITT/1r,rn
�vorA
4'
j :i 11 rl
—' -- � _ -�1 •.� �^ r �t'�' o CI �'�'. � I'-f
J FF., T'i r�rr
r•Z.�
IT
— i �� �;I � `� + �1• •_`>a �;v ,i,�`jju f��r�,e: ,�°r�, �=• Jv'•I.,. �. -r` �? � r`�l_ m m: '�-- -
fj
Ll
M- c o
I I rkr— ••'` -'� �P 1�•j,= 'brow, caw,u cw� �-. Ir1�
IT
tin
I lie _76
[E
-
_�i� -�! :/ '—� : -I = �;•�� f.itJ �:_` -��h •• _ -fir,��; '��I— � � �— �_' _
i ,L yet,••___"•` \�_a� _ i ti� ` -1 A. �' � ^tr �7 {. � - t � ai I i : -_
��•.: �"- \ — - _�= - \! i _ ���`� —�Ilr � -* I ' � . r ` -fir- - �!IC'CF'7-��Tbi�,J�� 1 A I I �i'� �. � L .
i ��
.._ >ow4sts
io
CONSULTANT'S PROPOSED PLAN
FOR CARLSON COMPANIES
a
l�
011
L�
W. 65TH STREET
1GQiGJ1�1G�71c�1�1
NCO
1c�idldtlll c d -1C
11
Lourxo.0 sau•..
.NOK.�L CENTRE
� o,fih
V U U
rl.wa.. 1
raee.0
.YIY[aoRR
1.11. o Lou. LEUU. d
J r TI
qr
�.. GG7-A $7-
1 t (CLOSE)
7 W w
2
41 > j .....
2 a Laeo..0 a � n...,w
X 7 uj
STRGAR -ROSCO : INC. CARLSONPROPERTIES ".."Jre g;-y "
f.ONC111_TINf. ENGINE IS SOUTHDALE SQUARE B aEHDES 5_29
CONCEPT ACCESS PLAN - - - ---- —
a I
9
y
June 13, 1984
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works and Engineeri g
SUBJECT: Improvement Feasibility Report (1984 -3)
The following improvments have been investigated and it has been determined
that they are feasible and their construction would be in the best interests
and toward the orderly development of the City of Edina:
IMPROVEMENT AND LOCATION
ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -26
Ashcroft Lane & W. 63rd Street
CASCADE LANE BERMING
ESTIMATED COST
$850.00
$1,975.84
I hereby recommend that upon acceptance of this report by the City Council
on June 18, 1984, Public Hearings on these improvements be scheduled for
July 2, 1984.
Respectfully submitted,
�l
Francis J. offma /P.
Director of Public Works and Engineering
cc: Mayor and City Council
FJH:lm
MEMORANDUM
To: The Honorable Members of City Council
and City Manager
From: Thomas S. Erickson
Date: June 14, 1984
Re: Development of Land Within Shoreland Setback
Areas
The Gustafson Replat in Indian Hills has raised
the question of whether the City should authorize a study
to be conducted for the purpose of adopting a new ordinance
or amending an existing ordinance to implement the general
objectives of the Edina Comprehensive Plan relating to
the protection of those areas within 100 feet upland of
naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams. At present
such protection is obtained only in connection with the
subdivision of land. As in the Gustafson Replat, there
are some properties in the City where the 100 foot protection
easement has not been obtained because the requirement
was instituted after the plat of the property. Therefore,
development of those properties could occur within the
100 foot protection area. A study could be directed to
whether it is advisable to require a dedication or grant
of such protected area not only in connection with a plat
but in connection with development of the property without
platting.
If such a study is desired, then, in order to
protect the planning process and health, safety and welfare
of the citizens of Edina, Council may consider it desirable
to adopt an interim ordinance pursuant to Minn. Statutes
Chapter 462.355, Subd. 4. A copy of a proposed ordinance
for the consideration of the Council is attached.
If the Council desires to adopt such an ordinance,
it should take the following steps in the following order:
1. Authorize, by resolution, the City planning
staff to conduct a study for the purpose
of considering adoption of a new ordinance
or amendment of an existing ordinance to
implement the objective of the Edina Comprehen-
sive Plan relating to protection of those
areas within 100 feet upland of all naturally
occurring lakes, ponds and streams in the
City of Edina; and
� r
v
2. adopt the attached interim ordinance (or
such substitute ordinance as Council may
determine). The Council may wish to waive
second reading of the ordinance.
If you have any questions concerning this memorandum
or the attached proposed moratorium ordinance, please
call either Tom Erickson or Gordon Hughes.
Thomas S. Erickson
V.
ORDINANCE NO.
PROHIBITING CONSTRUCTION OF NEW IMPROVEMENTS
AND EXPANSION OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS
ON LANDS ADJOINING LAKES, PONDS AND STREAMS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section T, Purpose. The Edina Comprehensive Plan (the "Plan ") was
approved by the Edina City Council on December 21, 1981, and approved
by the Metropolitan Council on October 8, 1981, all pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes Sections 473.851 through 473.872 (the "Metropolitan Land Planning
Act ") . Pursuant to the Plan and the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, Edina
is now conducting studies for the purpose of considering adoption of official
controls, to implement the Plan. The official controls being considered will
regulate and control, among other things, the construction of improvements
on lands adjoining lakes, ponds and streams. However, while the new ordinances
are being considered, such improvements are continuing, and may continue,
to be constructed and to expand and increase in size. Therefore, in order to
protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the ci.ti.zens
of Edina, it is necessary and desirable to impose the following moratorium.
Section 2. Moratorium. From the effective day of this Ordinance and for
a period of ninety (90) days from the effective date of this Ordinance, subject
to earlier termination or extension by the Edina City Council, the Edina City
Council and the Edina City staff shall not:
(1) accept, or continue to process, any new plat or subdivision;
(2) accept any applications for, or issue, any building permits;
(3) accept any applications for, or continue to process, any variances
from any existing platting, subdivision or building Ordinances
of the City; or
(4) allow the construction of any new, or the expansion of existing,
parking facilities
which will or may result in the construction of new improvements or an increase
in the exterior size of existing improvements located within 100 feet of the
centerline of Mi.nnehaha Creek or Nine Mile Creek or within 100 feet of the ordinary
high water elevation of lakes, ponds and wetlands shown. on a map on file in the
office of the City Engineer entitled Protected Waters Inventory dated 1979 and
revised December 7, 1981; provided, however, that only those wetlands so shown
which are defined as Type 5 wetlands according to Circular 39 of the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service shall be included for purposes hereof.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
(signed) Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
(signed) C. Wayne Courtney
Mayor
3¢ WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 THOMAS THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612)475 -0373 (612) 340 -2659
June 14, 1984
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Weed Ordinances
Dear Ken:
O_C
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406) 727-3632
SUITE 675 NORTH
1800 M STREET N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 955 -1050
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
011 331 562 32 50
I enclose herewith a proposed draft of Ordinance
No. 1040. This ordinance, as you requested, puts into
one ordinance the prior proposed amendments to Ordinance
No. 1211 and Ordinance No. 1031. This ordinance repeals
paragraph (e) of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1031, and
Sections 8 and 9 of Ordinance No. 1211, all of which deal
with the removal of weeds. The substantive changes resulting
from this ordinance are those underlined and dashed out
in Sections 1 and 3, and all of Section 4. However, Section 4
merely sets out in more detail the process to be followed
in removing weeds as permitted by Ordinance No. 1213.
The ordinance does not make any change in the
height of grass before it is a nuisance, i.e., it is yet
12 inches or one foot. The main purpose of the ordinance
is to better define weeds and rank vegetation and establish
a clearer procedure for removing weeds and tall grasses
when a property owner refuses or fails to do so.
Very truly yours,
Thoma . Erickson
TSE : j d
enclosure
cc w /enclosure:
voms. Marcella Daehn
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
( 612) 340-2600
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
TELEX: 29-0605
(612) 227 -8017
TELECOM ER : (612) 340-2868
P. O. BOX 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
( 507) 288-3158
3¢ WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 THOMAS THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612)475 -0373 (612) 340 -2659
June 14, 1984
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Weed Ordinances
Dear Ken:
O_C
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406) 727-3632
SUITE 675 NORTH
1800 M STREET N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20036
(202) 955 -1050
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
011 331 562 32 50
I enclose herewith a proposed draft of Ordinance
No. 1040. This ordinance, as you requested, puts into
one ordinance the prior proposed amendments to Ordinance
No. 1211 and Ordinance No. 1031. This ordinance repeals
paragraph (e) of Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1031, and
Sections 8 and 9 of Ordinance No. 1211, all of which deal
with the removal of weeds. The substantive changes resulting
from this ordinance are those underlined and dashed out
in Sections 1 and 3, and all of Section 4. However, Section 4
merely sets out in more detail the process to be followed
in removing weeds as permitted by Ordinance No. 1213.
The ordinance does not make any change in the
height of grass before it is a nuisance, i.e., it is yet
12 inches or one foot. The main purpose of the ordinance
is to better define weeds and rank vegetation and establish
a clearer procedure for removing weeds and tall grasses
when a property owner refuses or fails to do so.
Very truly yours,
Thoma . Erickson
TSE : j d
enclosure
cc w /enclosure:
voms. Marcella Daehn
ORDINANCE NO. 1040
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING POISONOUS PLANTS, WEEDS, ACCUMULATIONS
OF CERTAIN VEGETATION, AND GRASS OR GRASS -LIKE VEGETATION OVER TWELVE
INCHES HIGH, A NUISANCE, AND REQUIRING CUTTING OR REMOVAL THEREOF,
ESTABLISHING A PROCEDURE FOR CUTTING OR REMOVAL AND ASSESSMENT OF COSTS,
PROVIDING A PENALTY, AND REPEALING PARAGRAPH (e) OF SECTION 2 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 1031 AND SECTIONS 8 AND 9 OF ORDINANCE NO. 1211
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Declaration of Nuisance. The following vegetation
is hereby declared a nuisance: (a) all poisonous plants, including,
but not limited to, poison ivy, poison oak and ragweed, (b) all weeds,
including, but not limited to, those which are noxious as defined
by state law, (c) any accumulation of dead weeds, grass, brush or
other vegetation, and (d) any all other wank growths of grass or
grass -like vegetation;- inelueli:sg -any- grass-er -weeds standing over
one foot, or which have gone or are about to go to seed, and which
are situated within 500 feet of any residence or within 100 feet
of any regular }y- travelled road, alley or street; provided that part
(d) of this paragraph shall not be deemed to apply to weee7s;- grass -er
-ether - growths vegetation so situated that it is extremely difficult
to mew or remove, and provided further that none of this paragraph
shall apply to land owned by, or subject to easements in favor of,
the City and maintained by the City as a natural open space area.
Sec. 2. Duty of Property Owners to Remove Nuisance from
Their Property. Every owner of property on which is located vegetat:
declared by this ordinance to be a nuisance shall cause all such
vegetation to be cut or removed.
Sec. 3. Duty of Property Owners To Remove Nuisance from
Public Rights of Way. Every owner of p}atteel property abutting on
any platted public street, or alley or right of way shall cause the
vegetation declared by this ordinance to be a nuisance to be cut
from the line of such property nearest to such street, or alley or
right of way to the center of such street, or alley or right of way,
or to be removed therefrom.
Sec. 4. Notice, Abatement and Assessment.
(a) The City, acting by and through the City Manager,
may cause the nuisance to be removed and the cost thereof collected
from the property owner on whose property the nuisance was located,
or whose property abutted the public street, alley or right of way
on which the nuisance was located, all pursuant to provisions of
Ordinance No. 1213, and the following provisions: (i) before the
City causes the nuisance to be removed the City Manager shall mail
notice to the owner or owners of the affected property or properties
as such owners and their addresses are shown on the records of the
City, requiring remval of the nuisance within the time and in the
manner specified in the notice, and if not removed within the time
and in the manner specified in the notice, the City may proceed by
order of the City Manager and, pursuant to Ordinance No. 1213, to
rerrove the nuisance; (ii) the total cost of removal of the nuisance
incurred by the City, when determined, shall be charged to the owner
or owners of the property or properties to wham such notice was given;
(iii) if the charged cost is not paid by such owner or owners by
the date specified by Ordinance No. 1213, the costs not paid shall
be assessed against the affected property or properties of the non - paying
owner or owners pursuant to Ordinance No. 1213; and (iv) the above
process may be repeated as often as necessary to remove vegetation
declared by this ordinance to be a nuisance.
(b) If the nuisance consists of noxious weeds as defined
by state law, then the City, at the.option of the City Manager, may
proceed to remove the nuisance and charge the cost thereof to the
property owner pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sect. 18.271 in lieu
of the procedure set out at (a) of this Section. _
Sec. 5. Penalty. Any person who violates or fails to
camply with this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and
shall be subject to penalties pursuant to Ordinance No. 175. Such
penalties may be imposed in addition to any other penalty or remedy
herein prescribed.
Sec. 6. Repealer. Paragraph (e) of Section 2 of Ordinance
No. 1031, and Sections 8 and 9 of Ordinance No. 1211, are hereby
repealed.
Sec. 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in
full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the on
J1 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612.927 -8861
RESOLUTION GRANTING FIN PEAT
APPROVAL FOR COLONLAr COURT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofitfe City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Colonial Court ", platted by Donald R. and Shirley Ann
Berg, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council
of April 4, 1983, be and is hereby granted final plat approval, subject to
payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $8,000.00 and execution of a
Developer's Agreement.
ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983.
4
CITY OF
� EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612- 927 -8861
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL FOR WESTRIDGE ESTATES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Westridge Estates "., platted by Donald R. and Shirley A.
Berg, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council
of April 4, 1983,. be and is hereby granted final plat approval, subject to
payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $8,000.00 and execution of a
Developer's Agreement.
ADOPTED this 4th day of April, 1983.
jy_j�
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: INSURANCE RENEWALS /1984
DATE: JUNE 18, 1984
When the insurance policies were renewed last June, it was indicated
that the City would stay with those agents. While the insurance
industry has generally been faced with larger underwriting losses
coupled with lower investment returns due to lower interest rates,
the renewals do not generally reflect this. With the exception of
the property, the rates (per unit) have remained the same with the
increase in premiums reflecting only increases in estimated payroll
and /or sales. While there is an increase in the rate for the
property insurance it is still below the rates for the competition
last year.
It is recommended that the Council renew insurance coverage with the
following companies for 1984 -1985.
Coverage
Company
1983 -84
1984 -85
General Liability
Home
$ 35,153
$ 37,437
(29,880)
Worker's Compensation
Home
99,768
105,454
Liquor Liability
Home
6,512
6,935
Auto Liability &
Auto Physical
Home
14,064
14,064
(11,954)
(13,000)
Property (Buildings
Sayre & Toso
9,796
15,550
and contents) &
Business Interruption,
Transit & Voting Machines
Boiler Machinery
Hartford Boiler
4,540
(August Renewal)
Money & Securities
Home
1,298
1,382
Mobile Equipment
Home
2,096
2,225
Umbrella
St. Paul Surplus
6,000
6,500
Ambulance Attendants
Northbrook
900
900
GA-I
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A16
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO ADD A CERTAIN FEE NUMBER
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNES6TA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by addition
of Fee- No..15d -5a to read as follows:
ORD. SEC.
N0. NO. AMOUNT FEE NO.
433 6(d) Ventilation work permit 3. Domestic type kitchen or
bathroom exhaust system
Each system'when vented
individually in single
or multiple dwellings $16.00 15d -5
Each additional system 5.00 15d -5a =.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
' n OF cnm^
� F*_ .'— ~^
_--c*ccx no. cArc -____'-xmnumz_-'
�
|
c*ccx nL"Iarcn m6~14~8* »sc x |
�
Cuumr_mn°.zmV°_o-P°O°'nm%ooxsc_-___-_/
15170C C6106/F4 440.71 AT &'T
4 0.71
15336A 06/C6/84 2,295*11 M,UTUAL BENEFIT
15358F C6/C61F4 236.50 UESTERN LIFE
rcccp*mmc 10~*256~509~50
Lnmo xEnn ors � _ 10~4158~510~51
_cMpmv_PEnx--___-------- 10-4145~5.10_51 __
cpp Cnw7
10~4149~510~51
cppL Lzpc zmc 10~*157~510~51
'
` u __ _-
� |= !n.nU °
|''— - '-------- '-`--------�--���-----'----------------------�----- ---
c *o
pxwuuJ |�
,
^^°~cxs
__--_pxnuxu__ -`
,
--� � °°^~cvn - ^
nwnuxu
13 |
17 |
nAmu*L
^
i
-------�� ' --""|
°°^-rpn
|� !
numu«L
'`|
^°^~cxo-'_!°
nxwoxL
='!
c *o
pxwuuJ |�
,
^^°~cxs
__--_pxnuxu__ -`
,
--� � °°^~cvn - ^
-
3 P
157391
C6106/84
332.43
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10-4252-301-30
MANUAL
L
157391
C6/C6/14
8,995.53
KCSTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10-4252-322-30
L
.�
157391
L
_
o oerv4
_%5? xo_-___-_Nnor*cnm-Smrca
sLccruI___10-4
m2 3"5-3u
nmvu»L
1573Q1
06/C6fa4
91,74
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10-4 2 52- 35 8- 30
MANUAL
157391
06/C6/?4
19701.36
NCFTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10-4252-375-30
MANUAL
L
L
-
17
157391
06/C61?4
999.16
KCRTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
10-4252-520-52
MANUAL
MANUAL
157391
06/G6/84
13.90
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
20-1130-000-00
c
-
L
MANUAL
157391
06/06/84
328*83
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
23-4252-611-61
MANU �
�71
157391
06/C6/84
118.30
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
MANUAL
91
C6/C6184
967985—kCRTH.ERN—STATES---ELECTRIC
27-4252-661-66
MANUAL
1-157
157391
06/G6/94
95.54
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
27~*252~66 2~66
nwmuw�
-�
�~|
157391
06/06/84
2,782.24
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
28~42 52~708~70 '
nwvuxu
-
I
f f f f f f
158704 U6 /C6 /R4
17
21l ' 1547.0.5 -
f►ffff
°I 160770
CHECK REGISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 2
_________ ITE.M DES.C_RIPT_LON _ACCOUNT NO.._INV. _U_P_.O. I MESSAGE
199.32
NCRTHERN
STATES
r
ffAW
1984 CITY
CF EOItA
. NORTHERN_STATES
-
_._ELECTRIC._
k
__CHECK NO.
DATE
STATES
ELECTRIC
l157391
C6106/84
NCRTHERN
3_I---
_1.50391_____
- 06/0'6/44_ -.
_21,433.32: _______NORTHE.RN_STATES_
501.37 f
157391
06106/F4
40- 4252- 801 -80
219433.32
157391
6/76184
ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 801 -80
157391
U6/C6/84
STATES
j 157391
06/06/84
533-.12
°I 157391
06/06184
ELECTRIC
_157- 39..1_
_0- 6 /C6 /_8 4
NORTHERN
157391
C6/C6/84
50- 4252 - 841 -84
157391
06 /C6 /F4
I
f f f f f f
158704 U6 /C6 /R4
17
21l ' 1547.0.5 -
f►ffff
°I 160770
CHECK REGISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 2
_________ ITE.M DES.C_RIPT_LON _ACCOUNT NO.._INV. _U_P_.O. I MESSAGE
199.32
NCRTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
29 -4252- 721 -72
7
. NORTHERN_STATES
-
_._ELECTRIC._
__30- 4252 - 781 -78
37.02
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
30 -4252- 783 -78
?4.56
NCRTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
30- 4252- 784 -78
_21,433.32: _______NORTHE.RN_STATES_
501.37 f
MANUAL____
CORRECTION
40- 4252- 801 -80
219433.32
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 801 -80
2f143.32
NCRTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
40- 4252 - 801 -80
533-.12
- NDRTHER&_ST_ATES
CABLE.�V_ -__
ELECTRIC
50 -- 4.232- 821 -82
831.74
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
50- 4252 - 841 -84
462.79
NORTHERN
STATES
ELECTRIC
50 -4252- 861 -86
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 120 -12
1 .6.4203- ._..____Ch
52.00 CAREN BECKLEY POOL CASHIER 26- 3405 - 000 -00
52.00 f
MANUAL
- -,,.
4fi
MANUAL .__._._{+
MANUAL
-
MANUAL
I,
MANUAL
o
MANUAL
MANUAL
„.
MAYUAL.__+z
JOE ELIAS
MANUAL
3
MANUAL
•ff -CKS uai.
MANUAL-
22
:3
- -ff♦ -CKS - 2-
_�bJ131_B4___ _50_.110 CAR£NFrECKLEY- POD./-- CASHIER 24- 3�O�Q00 -0.0 ___MAN.UAL
50.00 f
06/13/84 300.00 FUSTMA'STER
POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290- 510 -51
'60
- -,,.
4fi
MANUAL
-
MANUAL
'
164154
06/13/84
_ MANUAL.._ -.
MANUAL
27- 4100 - 663 -66
501.37
JOE ELIAS
WAGES
3�
MANUAL
501.37 f
MANUAL____
MANUAL
a:
MANUAL
63 r
MANUAL
MANUAL
1_'!_164203
_
_._ . _ 06/13184
.2.1_.2.0
PETTY _CASH
CABLE.�V_ -__
10- 2149- 000 -00
164203
06/13/84
6.00
PETTY CASH
MISC
10 -3800- 000 -00
r'I
16420?
C6/13/84
2.50
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 120 -12
1 .6.4203- ._..____Ch
/13/-8_4_ - -
9.00
PFTTILCASN
MEETING__E_XPENSES
1Q- 4206- 160 -16
r4.I
164203
06/13784
9.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 420 -42
164203
C6113/P4
2.10
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4206- 421 -42
164203
C6/13184_
SfR7
_PETTY- CASH_
_ - MEETING_ EXPENSES_._____10-
4206 - 480 -48
164203
06/13/84
10.00
PETTY CASH
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 490 -49
1642J3
06/13/84
4.14
PETTY CASH
MILAGE
10- 4208 - 140 -14
_._6_._4.5_
F1<T.T_Y_CASJ+
- __M._ILAGE_
10- 4208 - 140 -16._-
I__�.642_C?______L61131P4
1642U3
76/13/F4
1.F4
PETTY CASH
MILAGE
10- 4208 - 500 -50
16420?
C6/13/P_4
.40
PETTY CASH
PCSTAGE
10 -4250- 200 -20
-
_1.64203 _
06113/84
_2 F_. 65
PETTY' CASH____________POSTAGE___
-4290- 260 -26
164203
^6/13/14
8.50
PETTY CASH
POSTAGE
__10
10- 4500- 120 -12
164203
05/13/84
13.90
PETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 420 -42
51i__
16.42_03_.___-
E6/L3L8.4___
__2_.43_
__P-ETT1' CAS- H____-
_GEN_SUP_PLIES
10 _4504- 440- 44
I
'
164233
06/13/34
2.96
PETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
r
,
164203
06/13/P4
11.16
PETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 500 -50
"
3
___06 /13/$4
4.19
FETTY_.CASH
GEN_ SUPPLIES
10 -4944- 180 -18
164203
J6/13/84
17.09
PETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
20- 2220 - 000 -00
,.
164203
U6/13/P4
6.25
PETTY CASH
LAUNDRY
20- 4262 - 622 -62
sly.
f1f- CKS...- - - "+
MANUAL
I ,R
,37
f ff -CKS !3e
MANUAL
- f..- CKS -
- -,,.
4fi
MANUAL
-
MANUAL
'
MANUAL
;
_ MANUAL.._ -.
MANUAL
MANUAL
,•3 v
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL____
MANUAL
a:
MANUAL
63 r
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
;;
Ilid
PANDA L
MANUAL
"I
MANUAL
__MANUAL
72
MANUAL
MANUAL
7-11
�
�35�r
Q
*1984 ! OF EDINA
• _ CHECK .N^. .DATE_ _______. - __A.MOUN_T___
I
7-
CHECK STER C6 -14 -8• AGE 3 1.
VENDOR ____ ITEM_DESCR.IP-TLON AC- COUNT NO -9_I_NV.- 11_P�0_•- #_MESSAGE -__ - --)
204.03 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS
6 74.18
199.54
"j 170076 06/13!84
-6 170026 061
_ B.ACGER_METER_INC WATER - _METERS
472.79 EACGER METER INC CATER METER
1,195.55 BADGER METER INC CATER METERS
10- 4540 - 783 -78
30 -1 -220- 000 -00 -
30 -1220- 000 -00
30 -1220- 000 -00
7
4 -
164203
06/13/84
1t!.50
FETTY CASH
GEN SUPPLIES
20- 4504- 627 -62
MANUAL
_- ]�_4Z.0_?
1.61.13184 -
7.S.L -_
- _GEN__S.UPPLl S _
20- 4504 -_6. 9 -42 _ -
-__ _- HANUAL__.__
--
i. -_
_ - _ - - -
-- - -- . - -- - -- -- ----
--- --- - -- - - --
- --
--
t f *!!-C K.S.
°
164251
06/13/R4
10,000.00
EDINA HRA
DUE HRA
10 -1145- 000 -00
MANUAL
'I
1rrlrr
+ *+ -CKS
,
164768
06/13/84
25.00
MN DEPT► OF LABOR
SEMINAR
10 -4202- 140 -14
MANUAL
'a�
25.70 +
„.I
+ +• -CKS
- -_
177,356._
C.5/12184
_- _ 233.24._
-_ - -_ MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT -
__- BLUE_ - PRINTING _
10- 4.570- 260 -
170003
06/12/84
119.95
ALBINSON
BLUE PRINTING
-26__
20- 4570 - 600 -60
°�
353.19 +
^I
170004
C6 /C8 /F4
145.51
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
'j
170004
06/11/84
7.83
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 482 -48
"I
17C004
-[61[8/8- 4_-- ___ -_-
_ 129_. -0�0
AMER-ICAA_LINEfLAU
NOR Y
1-0 -4262- 520 -52
-',
170004
06/11/R4
16.95
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
20- 4262- 628 -62
"j
170004
C6/O8/84
19.00
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
27- 4262 - 661 -66
054__
239.79
_LMERICAN_L_I NEN_____
LAUNDRY
27 -4262- 661 -66
170034
06/05/84
39.22
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 821 -82
1/0074
06 /0E /F4
76.35
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 841 -84
-
_1.7000.4
-_ 06,/[518_4-.
57_.57
AJ3ER.I..C_AN_LINEN_
LAUNDRY
50- 4262- 861 -86
731.22 +
170037
06/08/84
22.00
APEX PEST CONTROL
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -70
-
- - -- ._.
- - -- - - --
- - - - -- 22..00
klrrlr
+ ++ -CKS
°
170013
U6/11/84
33.96
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 328 -30
170013
06/11/84
34.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
i ",-_1.70013_--
_ -_ X6/11/94
17.80
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
_PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
,j
85.76 t
-- - --
-
170[24
66/11/84
40.60
ARTISTAT INC
PRINTING
23- 4600 - 610 -61
170025
06/CE/84
24.00
ALFONS ANDERSSON
CONT SERV
27- 4200- 661 -66
5
- - --
-
2 4_.0 0 +
_
204.03 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS
6 74.18
199.54
"j 170076 06/13!84
-6 170026 061
_ B.ACGER_METER_INC WATER - _METERS
472.79 EACGER METER INC CATER METER
1,195.55 BADGER METER INC CATER METERS
10- 4540 - 783 -78
30 -1 -220- 000 -00 -
30 -1220- 000 -00
30 -1220- 000 -00
7
4 -
13/84
170026 0
06/13/84
199.54
"j 170076 06/13!84
-6 170026 061
_ B.ACGER_METER_INC WATER - _METERS
472.79 EACGER METER INC CATER METER
1,195.55 BADGER METER INC CATER METERS
10- 4540 - 783 -78
30 -1 -220- 000 -00 -
30 -1220- 000 -00
30 -1220- 000 -00
7
4 -
�~ 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 4
CHECK N^. DATE .VENDOR_ -_ _ _ ITEM. DESC.RIP__TION AC_CO_UNT_ NOf_INV._q__PfOf A MESSAGE
w
al
170026
-- -- - - -- -
06/13/84
- -- - -- -
525.00-
- -- 2,021, 5 •
BADGER METER INC
-- -
CREDIT
30- 1220 - 000 -00
10- 4504 - 510 -51
199.05
BURY R CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
- _2-0_.9.09
PEBTE_LS.ON-
BRO_S__INC_
GEN- SUP_P_LIES-
I'
170028
6/13/84
619.00
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
27- 4630- 664 -66
w
�
177028
06/12/84
2 415.50
•
BEEP WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822 -82
EFRTELSON
10I
1711 - 2.fi____._
06L12L84
4_*_720 -0-0_
• BEE-R-II - LESALERS
I-NVENTORY
502T!4630- 842 -8_4 -__
26
- e.EPTE_LS.C.N-
170028
U6/12fF4
49909.36
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
w
I i;
BRYAN ROCK FR(0.
129664.16 •
CCNST
--
1700 7() 6/CE/84 25P.70 BERG B FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30
170029 L6/OE/94 123.30 BERG 6 FARNHAM CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30
w' 1701129_.-__9610Ef -24 X8_._85 - FERG R FAR_ "M CO GEN SUPPLIES 1.0- 4504 - 3.01 -10
y 7 42005 •
- -- - - - -- -- - - ---
a
e
fff -CKS 7 .
0
-- z
I"
1.4 -
'71
lie .
- - - -- -- f•+-CKS -
v�
"I -
17CO31
C6/C8/84
20.00
EERTELSON
RROS INC
GEN SUPPL -IES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
199.05
BURY R CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
- _2-0_.9.09
PEBTE_LS.ON-
BRO_S__INC_
GEN- SUP_P_LIES-
1.0- 4504 -_ 510 -51
v
a
17OU31
06/11784
16.75
BERTELSON
BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
_
10- 4516 - 160 -16
10 -4 314 -3C
170041
170031
U6/C8/94
28.97
EFRTELSON
BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
I
1700.31
06/11 /?4
26
- e.EPTE_LS.C.N-
BRCS - -IRO
CFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 45.16- 510- 51
j
•'I
170039
06/11/?4
219.48 +
BRYAN ROCK FR(0.
INC
CCNST
--
__110 0-3-2- __-
_16/1.1 L8.4 __
3.71.56
BRYAN ROCILQB00.--1NC
CONST
20- 1421 - 000 -00_
17D039
06/11794
855.48
BRYAN ROCK PROD.
INC
SAND GRAVEL
20- 4522- 642 -64
r
'
170033
X5/12/84
190.35
EERGFORO
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82
170033
C6/1�8/84. -__
__ 215.55
BERGFORD_TRUCKING
_INVENTORY
SG- 4626- 822 -82
I"
170033
06/1e'/84
2E3.05
BERGFORD
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
5U- 4626- 842 -84
170033
C6 /CE /E4
266.40
EERGFORC
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -84
'
17 0 .0.32 __-
_....06112L 4__
34� -0.❑
p.EAGEORIl_
LRU_C.KSNC_._
INV_EN.T_OR_Y
5Q- 4626 - 862 -86_.
;'I
170 ^33
C6 /CE /E4
115.40
EERGFORC
TRUCKING
INVENTORY
__-
50- 4626- 862 -86
M
.
19536.75 •
frff «•
z•.
3�I\
3
I
JAI
3'
,1•
- - -- - -- - - - - !ff -CKS - -- - " -I
qp
"I -
122!].'_8 ____-
__06/13L8_4__
1oQ. -07
GECRfI`flU_LLER_-
-4524- 301 -30
�DLICE_SEAV_ -_
L0- 410D__42�42
199.05
BURY R CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
100.00 +
170041
06/08/84
109996.25
BURY 6 CARLSON
v
a
10- 4524 - 314 -30
1790.4.1 -._
C61"8/R4-
- ��172_.1.0
BURY_ &_ CARLSON._INC
_BLACKTOP
10 -4 314 -3C
170041
_ _177039
06/11/84
_ 114.3.3________BRYAN_ROCK_PR00.
INC
INC_
___FILL MATERIAL-
10- 4518 - 345 -30___
20 9635.76 +
1700 30
06/11 /?4
5.447.52
BRYAN ROCK PROD.
INC
___
CLASS V MATERIAL
10 -4522- 314 -30
170039
06/11/?4
3S5.36
BRYAN ROCK FR(0.
INC
CCNST
10 -4532- 301 -30
__110 0-3-2- __-
_16/1.1 L8.4 __
3.71.56
BRYAN ROCILQB00.--1NC
CONST
20- 1421 - 000 -00_
17D039
06/11794
855.48
BRYAN ROCK PROD.
INC
SAND GRAVEL
20- 4522- 642 -64
r
'
79191.25
Y
tA - -
- I-
6C
fl
fff -CKS
�G7
Cl
7: � a
- -�7�
]i19L.9_A._
BURY__8,_CARLSON
__INC__ -_-
BLACKTOP_- ______10
-4524- 301 -30
170041
06/08/94
199.05
BURY R CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
170041
06/08/84
109996.25
BURY 6 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
1790.4.1 -._
C61"8/R4-
- ��172_.1.0
BURY_ &_ CARLSON._INC
_BLACKTOP
10 -4 314 -3C
170041
C6/0E/84
75.40
EURY 8 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
-524-
30 -4524- 783 -78
20 9635.76 +
Y
tA - -
- I-
6C
fl
fff -CKS
�G7
Cl
7: � a
- -�7�
°nx* cp comx
mccx-mc�,cxTc--_
� c*ccn urcn C6-1 4-8. ^sc n |
�
a,_w_pES-S xsE_-_--_-
13 1
�c
_-
�
^'
�
^.
"'
�
�
-
-
__
60.1
170073 L6/12/84 50.55 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50-46 30-82 2- 82 i"
170073 C6il2/f4 107*45 CITY -BEER ThVEhTORY 50-4630-8U-86
. �
170046
76/11/84
142.06
BRISSMAN
KENNEDY INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-520-52
17CO49
06/13/84
230.?0
BURESH
ROBERT
MEETING EXPENSES
10-4206-440-44
170C 5 3
06/08184
36.67
13ROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 4250 446-44
17 0 C 5 3
C6/08/F4
48.25
FROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REPOAL
170053
U6/08/84
21 .23
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
20-4250-646-64
170553
C6/C8/84
44.39
EROWNING
FERR IS
RUBBISH REPOM
20-4250-646-64
179n_53
G6/C8/94
77.20
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
27-4250-661-66
170U53
C6/C-E/F4
29.95
EROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
27-4,151-662-66
,:0
170053
C6/08/84
206.51
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50-4 2 50-841-8 4
170053
U6/C8/84
241.25
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
-4 2 50- 861- 86
0 'L17001?
C6/13/84
136*58
DAILY CONST REPORTS
ADVERTISING
iu-4210-140-14
�c
_-
�
^'
�
^.
"'
�
�
-
-
__
60.1
170073 L6/12/84 50.55 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50-46 30-82 2- 82 i"
170073 C6il2/f4 107*45 CITY -BEER ThVEhTORY 50-4630-8U-86
. �
1934 CITY OF FOINA
�r- -CHECK NC. CATE.
z
CHECK REGISTER
06 -14 -84 PAGE
- __AMO1N1 _--- .- VENDOR -_,_ ___ITEM. _DES.CRIP_T ON AC_COLN_T "_ I. N.V9__ # _P._0..__1_MESSAGE- -.__ -_
2
- -- * ** -CKS _.. -.I *.
s
I
a
*** -CKS
***-CPS
*** -ChS
170075
06/12/84
30.84
CLANCY DRUG INC
CABLE TV
10- 2149- 000 -00
10- 4274- 44C- 44____
.__170075
06/12/84_..____ -
_ _7.28CLANCY__DRUG__.
INC -_
GEN- SUP-P_LIES
10 -4504- 260- 26____
& SAFETY
GEN SUPLIES
170075
;6/12/?4
2.45
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 421 -42
126.76
CONWAY FIRE
170075
U6/12/84
12.83
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 510 -51
=
1Z00-7 5 -_._._
__- 06112/ 4__
X3_.33
CL1L'VLY _DRUG -I.NC_
_GEN- SUP3II ES
10- 45.04 - 550 -54
170075
06/12/84
11.95
CLANCY DRUG INC
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 783 -78
28- 4274 - 708 -70
89.28
•
28.00
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CLOTHING REPLACMENT
30- 4274 - 782 -78
;SIC
170082
u6/12/, ?4
__128.50 -.__
CONWAY FIRc*-&_-
- .1ZOJ78- _ -
-_-, 6/12 LE 4----?
9 45 5
rnCA C_9.LA_ BOT_TLIN_G_
I_NVE.N_T_ORY _-
5_Q- 4-6.32- 822 -82__
1700132
06/12/34
17Pn78
U6/12/84
19055.40
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
170078
56/12/84
858.65
COCA COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86
50- 4248 - 821 -82
t
U_ &/-1.2IA_4_
H0 50
CONWAY-FI_RE FIRE
-CONT-PEP-AIRS-
50- _4248- 841 -L4
rZ
`OI
rr4 rrr
170082
06/12/84
3.50
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CONT REPAIRS
1700,10
06/('8184
29636.80
CONT -MINN
GEN SUPPLIES
21 -4504- 661 -66
553.51 •
29636.80
°`
%wl
----
170a32- -__-
_! 6.1121.84
11.10__
C NWAY__F RE- &- SAF�1Y
F.OUIP_MA_INI
1.0-4.27.4-421 -_42
i
170082
06/12/84
14.00
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 421 -42
170082
U6/12/p4
138.50
CCNWAY FIRE 8 SAFETY
EQUIP PAINT
10- 4274- 421 -42
._-
A_701. 2_ ___
_06/13/84_
_- _5-3- ..00 -_
CONWAT FIRE_ &_ SAFETY- ___-
EQUIP_MAINT_
10- 4274 - 440 -44__
r "7
170082
06/13184
12.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274- 440 -44
MILEAGE
170UE2
06/13/84
12.75
CONWAY FIRE 9 SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 440 -44
„-
_l70o82__
_0�/_1�1�4__
1�Z5
C -ChIiA.Y__Fa3_E-&- SAF_ETT
E9.UIP--MA-INT
-- 10- 4.274-440_:._4.4
�,I
170092
06/13794
13.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 440 -44
v
170082
U6/13/34
27.75
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 440 -44
2
- -- * ** -CKS _.. -.I *.
s
I
a
*** -CKS
***-CPS
*** -ChS
w
OEL73184
24.50_
C_0WATFI-R-E__8_
SAFETY --
EQUIP.- MAINT_
10- 4274- 44C- 44____
L_170.C82.
1700p2
06/18/84
4.75
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
GEN SUPLIES
-
20- 4504- 646-64
-- -- -_ - -- - --
170082
,:6/13/x4
126.76
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
SAFETY EQUIP
20- 4642- 646 -64
;C
13_.25- _-
-._CIlNHAY F1RE__&_SAFET_Y
GEN_SUPP_L.IES______
23-4504- 61.1 -61-
170082
U6/13/84
38.50
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
E..9UIP MAINT
28- 4274 - 708 -70
170082
G6/G8/84
28.00
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CLOTHING REPLACMENT
30- 4274 - 782 -78
;SIC
170082
u6/12/, ?4
__128.50 -.__
CONWAY FIRc*-&_-
SAFETY_
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248- 821 -82
1700132
06/12/34
1P.50
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248- 821 -82
li
170082
G6/12/84
128.50-
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CORRECTION
50- 4248 - 821 -82
t
U_ &/-1.2IA_4_
H0 50
CONWAY-FI_RE FIRE
-CONT-PEP-AIRS-
50- _4248- 841 -L4
,9C
170082
06/12/84
3.50
CONWAY FIRE
& SAFETY
CONT REPAIRS
50- 4248 - 861 -86
553.51 •
°`
*rr444
* ** -CKS
--17.0
0 S7- _.___
_0.6/lE/_E_4_ - -__
___4 00 _._
- �DUR7l�E. YC AtiAE--- _--
_J±EE7I_NG_EEEASES
_1.0- 42.06- 100 -1 Q
r "7
170091
76/08/84
32.52
COURTN13Y C WAYNE
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 100 -10
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
36.52
�,I
_.._
- -
-- - --
.,..I
.. • r ..
***-CPS
40
40
�J -1Z
199_
/nA /134
40.32
CUSHMAN MOTOR
CO
RFPATR PARTS
10-4540-560!!56
w
- �__--_—________-
�
~ 198 4 , OF comA
` \ -_zescv xC. oo7c
|'|
170099 0*mvvn4
`
'
'
`
�
�
-
-oMou�_T-__--
oo.ro
~- --
�
|
cuccx .zuTcn 06~14~ pooc r
` L
-_'_vF-NonD--- -__--__---17cm-VE ouxY-mo° Jmw_-'wp°O-~'nrcoaxoc_'_-.-
nuoHmxm mo7nn co ncp^zn pxnvs 27~4540~662~66 " +
�_______
.,l-
---------- -_�-~*°~c*s
`
170106
06f13184
100.00
OAHL- MR HILDING
POLICE SERV
10-4100-420-42
170108
J6/QE/?4
21.00
CALE GREEN COMPANY
SOD BLACKCIRT
10-45e2-301-30
170108
J6/08/84
5F*00
CALE GREEN COMPANY
SOD 9 BLACKDIRT
10-4562-319-30
170110
06/12/84
215.70
CAVIOSEN DIST IhC
INVENTORY
50-46 30-82 2-82
1791 if)
06/12/F4
609.20
CAVIDSEN DIST INC
INVENTORY
50-4630-842-84
170111
L6111/84
26.50
CAVIS WATER EQUIP CO
REPAIR PAPTS
30-4540-783-78
1701 14
6 /F4
0 /C8
61 o02
CEtEGARD TOCL CC
REPAIR PAPTS
10-4540-540-54
170114
06/08/84
10.11
DELEGARD TOOL CO
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-540-54
3,1
79.22
170125
06/13/84
20.00
PERU SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-466-44
170125
C6/C8/94
478.50
FERIT SUPPLY
170125
U6/13fp4
270.05
PERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
23 4504 611-61
170125
C6/13/84
337.05
PERIT SUPPLY
CONSTRUCTION
26:1300:000-00
�_______
.,l-
---------- -_�-~*°~c*s
`
19084 CITY OF EDINA
CHE-CK. NC..—CATE-
CHECK REGISTER
06-14-84 PAGE 8
.- - --- ----A MU-hl- -V-E ND-OR --- -----!TE-P-DE-S-C-RIP-troN
C 61-02 /- 8 4 .6..-75---r-13YW-LDE-SER-VICES--CGNT--REPATR 5.9-42-48--8-41m84-
36.75 *
06/13/84 200*91 EARL F ANDERSEN PARK EQUIP
20- 4932 - 600 -60
06/11/84 125.31 ENRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66
96/12f84 112.30 ENRICH BAKING CO CCNCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66
13D.*4-8 FPRTCH A -KLNG CC r C N CF-S-SMS 27- 46.2_4- 6.64-6.6
368.09 *
!4 v.
5
7
Ic
13
: 4
***—CKS
C7
1771 46
06/12/84
3 --17 01- 3 4---
GREEN ACRES SPKL
CORRECTION
20 -4248- 646 -64
1701'46
�z ;_r
17^143
fl-611-21-84—
170143
-G—R.EEX—ACRES SPKL
IZI�1-4-3
20- 4-2-4-8T-646-64---
zo
CHECK REGISTER
06-14-84 PAGE 8
.- - --- ----A MU-hl- -V-E ND-OR --- -----!TE-P-DE-S-C-RIP-troN
C 61-02 /- 8 4 .6..-75---r-13YW-LDE-SER-VICES--CGNT--REPATR 5.9-42-48--8-41m84-
36.75 *
06/13/84 200*91 EARL F ANDERSEN PARK EQUIP
20- 4932 - 600 -60
06/11/84 125.31 ENRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66
96/12f84 112.30 ENRICH BAKING CO CCNCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66
13D.*4-8 FPRTCH A -KLNG CC r C N CF-S-SMS 27- 46.2_4- 6.64-6.6
368.09 *
!4 v.
5
7
Ic
13
: 4
***—CKS
C7
'%w I I
1771 46
06/12/84
9*96—
GREEN ACRES SPKL
CORRECTION
20 -4248- 646 -64
�z ;_r
--l-Ml -4 6-----
fl-611-21-84—
9-9--6-6
-G—R.EEX—ACRES SPKL
20- 4-2-4-8T-646-64---
zo
°7I
170146
36/12/84
9.96
GREEN 'ACRES SPKL
-0-N-T—REP-A-IR.S
CONT REPAIRS
20-4248-646-64
2,
22
99.66
3o
*or—CKS
27
17 n 1 -9--o
6 /—l-Z L&4-
4`a0
EMERERG GOLF —CARTS
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
4.80
37
3f,
-***-CKS
170154
06/13/84
504.00
JOE ELIAS
SALARY
27-4100-663-66
*—C KS
45
bn
G
1771 62_
U6/12f84
10.96
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-662-66
10.96
1
C I(S
1 f) 1 64
06/08184
6-44
FREEWAY -DODGE INC----
REPAIR PARTS-----
10- 4540 - 560 -56
im
170164
06/C8184
23.88
FREEWAY DODGE INC
REPAIR PARS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
170164
--17U1-64_._____.S6
06108/84
/DR /_R_4_
15*68
25-m73
FREEWAY DODGE INC
FJY—EAA-Y—L-MGE--nC—REP—A-IR--PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
1Q- 4540 - 560 -56
71.73
c
170175
06/13/84
C 6 /I-lLl-4----
57.46
9 90--
FRITZ CO
FR TZ CO ----CJY
CONCESSIONS
r C E
27- 4624 - 664 -66
6
G7
117.36
11DJ-- 76
06t12r24L----809-o.35-6-q.LikC-QNTJ3-A.CTIN-G—.INC--C�QN-STR-UC-TIN
60-1300- 25 9-0 4
1!09.35
75
C
'%w I I
[1984 1.
OF EOINA
'i 6 /11 f 84
C6/Cd/84
19.00
.-AGE 9
EQUIP RENAL
CHECK
STER 06-14-84
--C!-!!:Cl(
NC.-CdTE
A
100000
GENERAL COM14UNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10-4294-420-42
PARTS
REPAIR PAPTS
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
-10---4540-560--56
70188
0 6 /13 F4
5.76
GEhUINE
PARTS
lZol
529.20 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
06/13/84
401 .55
CO
REPAIR PARTS 10-4504-540-54
27-4540-671-66
'4 vrV2az-
�Z�
c6v08/84 on.p* p°p° rcLL compxxr wcLozmn SuppLzco 10~4610~560~56
'
^�
-----' ---'
155 �2
cvo
-----------i 1
96/13/84 R77.80 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10-4618-560-56
�
---'-- -
_---
170194
170194
'i 6 /11 f 84
C6/Cd/84
19.00
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP RENAL
10-4226-301-30
'
100000
GENERAL COM14UNICATNS
RADIO SERV
10-4294-420-42
PARTS
REPAIR PAPTS
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
-10---4540-560--56
170209
C6/Cf/F4
5.76
GEhUINE
PARTS
lZol
170195
06/13/84
401 .55
GOLF CARS MIDWEST
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540-671-66
o«
o^vCo/e
LAUNDRY --_—
10_4262_520~5"
��_'_oa�ce�
-
LAUNDRY
'^--~"^-^°"~"°
vroxou
06/0E/e4
z��
^°"="°"-"
~°--="-"°"- 64
'
170206
06/co184
140~ 00
s w m SERVICES
LAUNDRY
30~4262-78 3~78
|
�
1rp2p4
—� o*y�����
/�
_---''
_c&U'
^��RDJ��0
� `
193F7°35
_ ------
�-- ------'--/
|
=
^~
'4 vrV2az-
�Z�
c6v08/84 on.p* p°p° rcLL compxxr wcLozmn SuppLzco 10~4610~560~56
'
^�
-----' ---'
155 �2
cvo
-----------i 1
96/13/84 R77.80 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10-4618-560-56
�
---'-- -
1 70209
06/OE184
51.20
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PAPTS
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
-10---4540-560--56
170209
C6/Cf/F4
5.76
GEhUINE
PARTS
PARTS
10-4620-560-56
'4 vrV2az-
�Z�
c6v08/84 on.p* p°p° rcLL compxxr wcLozmn SuppLzco 10~4610~560~56
'
^�
-----' ---'
155 �2
cvo
-----------i 1
96/13/84 R77.80 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10-4618-560-56
�
---'-- -
-'I 1984 CITY OF TDINA
-- CHECK- N%_ DATE
I
,zr
17 v
I tLMCLOJL- GEN_S_UP�LIES t0 -_4_594- .301- 3.0 - - -- - - - - --
i 30.00 + - -- - - - - -- "
12L
_170239
127 �— e_e_._... t.
''I 170243
- - - - --
170218
66/08/84
_17.0228
• 1 f f r .
66/8/84
170256
170228
06/CE/84
of
170228
C6/0E/84
REGISTER
CONCESSIONS
.170270
06 -14 -84 PAGE 10
4 53--
„I
170229
06/08784
. _--
rfrrir
- --
le
170234
C6/C8/84
17 v
I tLMCLOJL- GEN_S_UP�LIES t0 -_4_594- .301- 3.0 - - -- - - - - --
i 30.00 + - -- - - - - -- "
12L
_170239
127 �— e_e_._... t.
''I 170243
- - - - --
170249
CARLSON PRINTING
�
I�
• 1 f f r .
-,1
170256
_CA.RLSON_.P_RINIING--
____ -_- PRINTING
ririr• - --
06//0315
CHECK
REGISTER
CONCESSIONS
.170270
06 -14 -84 PAGE 10
4 53--
fENESUPPL_IES
v`rl
110211
. _--
T_TEM_0ESVUP_TION
AC _COU_N_T- N.O..- _NV.__q_P-..O.
-p MESSAGE__ —__
1
,
_-
CCRRECTICN
27- 4624- 664 -64
170278
-�
170278
• *►- CKS- - -
z
- -��
.
22.20
HILLSTROM
AUTO
SUP Y
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
-
_246.18-
-H ILLS TROM__AUTO_
SUP_ Y
_REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
37.98
HILLSTROM
AUTO
SUP Y
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
y
441.50
HILLSTROM
AUTO
SUP Y
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
747_8.6 •
63.35
HOEART
EQUIP MAINT
27- 4274 - 661 -66
17
fff —CKS
le
Ilya
17.75
hOCTEM1 CLEANERS
LAUM1ORY
10- 4262 - 421 -42
--- - - - -
-- 1
17.75
:.o
---
_- -_.__.
-- -._
— _- - -____
- •ff -CMS _
`I
17 v
I tLMCLOJL- GEN_S_UP�LIES t0 -_4_594- .301- 3.0 - - -- - - - - --
i 30.00 + - -- - - - - -- "
12L
_170239
127 �— e_e_._... t.
''I 170243
- - - - --
xl
„Ia
U6/11.184_ ., _ 105.00 _______H!LD.RA.ULIC- JACK___ - REPAIR _P -ARTS_ 10- 4540 - 540 -54
105.00
Ira a
- -- - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - -. •+ -CKS - -- _ I,r
Z17
C6 /O8 /84 150.54 hARMON GLASS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 30
------- - - - - --
06/13/84 100.00 WILLIAM HOFFMAN POLICE SERY 10- 4100 - 420 -42
10Q -00 •
a•.
•ff —CMS
06/13/84
616/08/84.
452.35 ICSI
452.35 •
TELEPHONE
-DUES
80.00 •
10- 4256 - 510 -51
- 10- 4204 - 140 -14-
06/11/84
170249
CARLSON PRINTING
�
I�
• 1 f f r .
-,1
170256
_CA.RLSON_.P_RINIING--
____ -_- PRINTING
ririr• - --
06//0315
521 ?,q •
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSIONS
.170270
v,l
4 53--
fENESUPPL_IES
v`rl
110211
. _--
1702 7 7_. _
170278
06/11/84
10.49-
_-
CCRRECTICN
27- 4624- 664 -64
170278
-�
170278
CONCESSINS
27 -4624- 664 -64
v'
-_ 10.49__
J_RR1LS__Y-0 - -ODS _
17,12 7.5
xl
„Ia
U6/11.184_ ., _ 105.00 _______H!LD.RA.ULIC- JACK___ - REPAIR _P -ARTS_ 10- 4540 - 540 -54
105.00
Ira a
- -- - - - -- - - -- - -- -- - -. •+ -CKS - -- _ I,r
Z17
C6 /O8 /84 150.54 hARMON GLASS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 30
------- - - - - --
06/13/84 100.00 WILLIAM HOFFMAN POLICE SERY 10- 4100 - 420 -42
10Q -00 •
a•.
•ff —CMS
06/13/84
616/08/84.
452.35 ICSI
452.35 •
TELEPHONE
-DUES
80.00 •
10- 4256 - 510 -51
- 10- 4204 - 140 -14-
06/11/84
253.00
CARLSON PRINTING
PRINTING
10- 4600- 140 -14
C6/11/,84. -_.
2.75..��6nn0_
_CA.RLSON_.P_RINIING--
____ -_- PRINTING
4600 - 140 -14
06//0315
521 ?,q •
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSIONS
__10-
27 4624 664 66
//84
4 53--
fENESUPPL_IES
7L84__
-
JERRYS_EO_ODS— _____
_274450466610 -66
06/11/84
10.49-
JERRYS FOODS
CCRRECTICN
27- 4624- 664 -64
06/11/84
10.49
JERRYS FOODS
CONCESSINS
27 -4624- 664 -64
_--- U.6/- L1%B_4—
-_ 10.49__
J_RR1LS__Y-0 - -ODS _
CON_CES_S.IONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
(64.58) '�
-
51 a
—___ S
+ff -CKS ,.
G I
f.�
c
07 �
I7GIi
� a
1984 C.
OF ECINA
CHECK K
STER
06.14 -84
AGE 11
_.-
CM.ECK .NC.
_GATE
--
P•0._p_MESSAGE__
`
-._�`
ll
170279
06/12/84
13.49
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 318 -30
4'
3
17 ➢2_Za_____ -_-
06/1.2/ ?4_
__ M-81-
JERRYS- _OU.R- OWN._
HDWE----
GE.NERAL__SUPPLIE.G_-
10- 4504 -- 325- 30
dal
170219
06/12/84
2.49
JERRYS CUR OWN
HCWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 390 -30
17 ^279
06/12/84
22.90
JERRYS CUR OWN
HOaE
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10- 4504- 420 -42
1e
_170279 _._
06/12/_8.4
5. 40-___-
__- JERRYS_CUR._O.WN__
HOWE
_ - -__- GENERAL SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 421 -42
jr
170279
06/12/84
44.15
JERRYS CUR OWN
HCWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
170274
06/12784
3.38
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
- 10- 4504 - 470 -47
I °I
_
i06J1Z1fl4. -.-
4 -6.1.2
oXRRY_S_.OUfL._OWN_HO.WE
GENERAL_SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 520 -52_
170279
06/12/84
8089
JERRYS CUR OWN
HOWE
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
V
"
170279
06/12184
10.95
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 440 -44
14
70279 ._
06/12/8455
-.94
JERRYS__OUQ- OWN__HOUE.
-__ TOOLS ____
1Q- 4580- 560 -56
170219
06/12/84
17.29
JERRYS CUR OWN
HOWE
GENERAL SLPPLIES
10 -4604- 260 -26
_
"
170279
6/12/84
14.54
JERRYS CUR OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
20- 4248 - 646 -64
oI"�
________-
06L121Q.4_-
_294,.9.6
JERRY-S�UR- OW- N. _HDWE_______GENERA_L-
SUP_P-OUR
2.0- 4-504- 646 -66___
,gam
zol
`1202.71-
177219
u6/12134
95.46
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
PEDAIR PARTS
20- 4540 - 646 -64
170279
06/12/E4
47.99
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
PAINT
20- 4544 - 646 -64
17Q279
06/12/84
95.61
JERRYS CUR_ OWN_HDWE_
__TOOLS
20- 4580 - 646 -64
'r
170279
06/12.84
17.79
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
_
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
170279
06/12/94
55.53
1ERRYS CUR OWN
HCWE
GENERAL SLPPLIES
27- 4504- 663 -66
I_1_70.279 -__
_04[12/ -94_
1.3_.A8
.JERRY-'Z,-OU- '3_- .O- W.N_HD.WE
- C.LE.ANIN.G- SUPPLIES
27- 4_ "12- 661_ -_66
'
170274
06/12/84
1.99
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 661 -66
170279
U6/12184
13.88
JERRYS CUR OWN
HCWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 663 -66
3`I�
'
- _17!1279_ _ _
_ - 06/ 1218.4_
1.3.88 - -___,
FfiRYS_OUR_OWN.
HCWE___
__CCR.RECTI.ON _
__ 4512 - 663 -66-
'3z
170279
06/12184
76.47
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
-27- -__
27- 4620- 662 -66
-
' \ _ `'i
-
d�n'�7a
coin;, /A /.
•
7 SO
�Y 3 OUR 011 M
roove. n
1
0 CILSSTOT -
- - - -
=' es
3 _
- --
=°
170279
06/12184
.y- =--
2.39
d--
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
nn.. rc�rn
TOOLS
-
Y6'C4 va'6 -ate
28 -4580- 708 -70
?r
37
13„-
Li-
170219
06/12/84
31.89
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 783 -78
17- 0275__
__06/1.21.84
_-- __1.0_.48
JERRIL�CU�OyILHOWE_
GE7IE.RA_L_SLPPLI_ES
40- 4504 - 8.01 -8_C
3; 1
I
-
--- - - - -
-- -
-
" --
* * f_-
43
�.,
- --
- -- -- --
_CKS---
- -;.,�
170283
46/13/84
847.00
JONES CHEMICALS
INC
CHEMICALS
26 -4564- 689 -68
70283
J6/ 13/ a4
19_517.40.._JONES_
-C HEM ICALS_INC_-
__WATER- SUPPLIES
30- 4622 - 785- 78_,_,
n
�.,
170243
06113/84
118.90
JONES CHEMICALS
INC
WATER SUPPLIES
30- 4622- 785 -78
FI
29483f2O
rrrfra
* ** -CKS
,ea
�._ --
170290 . - -
^6/11/84_
_- 90_.40
T.OF f�UALIT_T FOODS_
_- C.ONCESSIO -NS
27- 4624- 664 -66
170290
06/C8/84
114.95
TOP QUALITY FOCDS
CCNCESSICNS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
�•s
170290
06/11/84
161.75
TOP QUALITY FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
-- --
- - - --
367.00 •
j.o
6,
•tilt•
•* *-CKS
170300
06/13/84
29402.61
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SPORT SUPPLIES
20 -1430- 000 -00
170300
06/13/94
1,700.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SPORT SUPPLIES
20- 1432 - 000 -00
'__-
_170.32 0_. -
- 106.[1- 3. -/94__ --
3*-01-9_.39 -_
K.OKESH_ATHLETIC
SPOR_T__--SUPP_LIES
2Q•4.5.04- 621 -62
C;_`
170300
06/13/84
280.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SPORT SUPPLIES
20- 4504- 624 -62
__ -
__?�
1703CO
06/13184
95.00
KOKESH ATHLETIC
SPORT SUPPLIES
20- 4504 - 625 -62
1 ;`
` -,!-
1.7.0- QO136113L8.4
19092•_10
K -OKE311 ATtiLE_T_I.0
SPORT SUPPLIES_
20 -4586- 623 -62
;7:
89589.01 •
-
- - --
13
w
�'- 1984 CITY
�.._ _.._CHECK NO.
z
1Z03C2_..- _ --
170372
faraf •
.1.123 0 4 -_ --
170304
170304
__17010 4
I 170304
170394
1.70!3 -C4 -
_ 177304
'j 170304
�_ -CI ff /•ff
OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 12
DATE_. - ___- AMOU.NJ__ -___- V- E_NDOR__ __._ _ -- _ -I T_EM- .E.SCRIMON1 AC_COU_N- LNO. -INV._ p_P.O. 11 MESSAGE___
- 06/12./_84__- _-- _ - -_ -2. 944 5.._70_____.- KUETHER- LST -CO_ _ YNVENT_CR_Y 50.- 4630- 822 -82. -_ ____
06/12/ ?4 69367.10 PUETfWER LIST CO INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84
89916.80 +
.y -6- 1.11784
22 32
. KNO)L_LUMH.ER_CO-
- _GEN_SUPP_LIES
20 -4104- .6.46 -64
C6 / 08 /R4
149.05
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPLIES
27 -4504- 663 -66
J W)E /84
26.67
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 708 -70
C6 /CE /84___
- -- 25.37 -
KNGX__LUMBER.
-CO.._
�6 /CF /R4
__ REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540- 708 -7Q
06/08/84
31.84
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540- 708 -70
06/13/94
28.46
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
28 -4604- 708 -70
C6113tF4_- -_..__
- P➢ -.F2.
MNCX_Ll:ltBER
-CC_
_- __lUMBER
-28 -4604- 708 -70__
76/13/84
7.55
KNOX
LUMBER
CC
LUMBER
28- 4604- 708 -70
66/13/94
139.76
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
28- 4604- 708 -70
110311
06/08/ ?4
2j 170311
06/12/84
170311_
06/12/84_
170311
06/12/84
�G
17031 7
271
frfaaf
170317
60.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
39149.85 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
- 5.011 -.20. _EASTS.IDE_SEVERAGE-
69555.95 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
149877.00 +
INVENTORY
27- 4630- 664 -66
INVENTORY
170317
INVENTORY
170317
INVENTORY
_11- -31 7_..__ _ ___ --
LAWSON ''PRODUCTS
17031 7
SUPPLIES
170317
'6/11/84
1703 1 F
'
17.0318_ -_. -_
SUPPLIES
170318
y
170318
\►I�'`"
17 C 319
10- -4620- 560 -56
�6 /CF /R4
„� --
e
170325
v I
SUPPLIES
20- 4504 - 646 -64 ______
1.70331
jF-170331
LAWSCN PRODUCTS
v
170331
60.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
39149.85 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
- 5.011 -.20. _EASTS.IDE_SEVERAGE-
69555.95 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
149877.00 +
INVENTORY
27- 4630- 664 -66
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
INVENTORY
-__50 -4630- 842 -84
INVENTORY
50-4630-862-86
6 6/021?4 -____
220.11_
LAWS0N_FR000CTS
GEN
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 318 -30
06/CE/94
454.61
LAWSON ''PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
'6/11/84
139.89
LAWSON FRODUCTS
GEN
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 325 -30
1) 6/-1-1!_84_
_331 +Q9
A.WSON_PR0_DU.CIS
P_aRTS__.
10- -4620- 560 -56
�6 /CF /R4
519.96
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPPLIES
20- 4504 - 646 -64 ______
06/CE184
270.54
LAWSCN PRODUCTS
GEN
SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 708 -7C
06/0F/84
116.75
LEEF BROS
INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 440 -44
0.6/7_1784_
P.S1.0-
_LEEF B.R.OS_.TNC_
__ GEN._SUP_P.LLE_S-
2.3- 450.4- 611- 61___-
U6/C8/84
R.60
LEEF BROS
INC
LAUNDRY
27- 4262- 662 -66
66/08/84
14.00
LEEF BROS
INC
LAUNDRY
28- 4262 - 708 -70
147.35 +
06/11/9+4
670.00
LEITNER COMPANY
SAND GRAVEL
27 -4522- 662 -66
C6/C8/F4 --
132.48
132.48
LONG LAKE FCRD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56
- -06/11/84_ 230_..00 LAPASS_C_CRP-CRA.TICN_ CCNT- R- EP_A_IP _10- 4248 - 560 -56
06/11/84 1F"4.00 LAHASS CORPORATION PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56
06/13/84 39647.00 LAHASS CORPORATION TRUCKS 40- 4910- 802 -80
3 .
s
G
7
_ o
+► + -C KS
10
I, 3
I16
=\
J \
11c
'I
+ + + -C KS z:,l
Z
I
3:
fff -C KS 3I
jn
�O
Sri
�s •
- 60
6,
C1
a +f-CKS G] \
F�
GC
• + +- C KS
I,nly
�r u �
u
1984 Y C
_____CHECK _N7. _
3
i r f r i i
0.339 - ---- - ___ 06/11/84 - - - -_
F EOIAA CHECI ;ISTER 06-14- PAGE 13 1�
DATE. _____- ___- __..AHOU_N7 - .VENDOR -ITEJi OE.SSRIPILQN AC_ COUN7 7l 0.- INY •- b_P•_0_•__p_MESSAGE-- __. - - -j
4461.00
c
IT
` '�
•rrra
258.57
"
170342
HEAT
10- 4254 - 446 -44
,.:
;
rrrrri
170354
I
170344 -
.>'ni
177344
'��
V;
I
rrrrra
-- rrr -CKS °I
107..52 _ LAKELANO- ENG- IR_"R1S 30 -4540- 785 -78
107.59 f - - - - - -- - - - -- - -
J6/11/84 135.35
06/13/94 -- - - - - -- 44.33
C6/13/p4 33.12
- - -- - - -
77.45
3
PAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
eif
rrr -CKS I.
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44
MED OXYGEN 8 EGUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 z n`
f `,I
•rr -CKS z�
1 17f1i ., TNr REPAIR PARTS 10 -454 56 !°
L R1 MINN MiNN TORO -QQ -56
125.61 + - - -- -- - - - - -- °;,,
9.60_ MLNNESOLA- 49NNEii GI=N SUPPLIES 20 -45Q4- 646 -64
- - - - - -- - - - --
72
9.60 + 7.1
7"
IT
170354
u6/13/84
258.57
'INNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 446 -44
;
.. r f f r a -
170354
06/13/84
363.35
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
Ida
10- 4254 - 520 -52
.
1.70354. _- _
- 06/ 13 18421.2.09
- - --
MINNEAPOLIS- GAS__CO_-
170358
HEAT
3j
10- 4254- 540 -54
3M ALARM
SERVICE
ALARM SERVICE
171?354
06/13/84
136.64
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
_ _
10- 4254 - 611 -61• =1
3M Al eaM
SERVILE
: °I
170354
U6/13/84
932.90
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
20- 1130- 000 -00•
-
'
17-0 35.4__.
-_C _6/_13/_84-
31.1..09 M ]YNEAP_9LI-NEAP
HEAT
20- 4254 - 646 - -64
- 1 7.02____
_
=°
170354
L6/13/84
0.42
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
27- 4254 - 661 -66 !37
104.21
MINN TORO
INC
170354
06/13/84
39.33
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
27- 4254 - 662 -66
2.77
'
-'
I"
170354-_ _____g6/13/84.
_ -_ -
__- 3.00_---
MINNEAPOLIS-GAS .CO___
- -_ -HEAT_ _
28- 4254- 708 -70
170354
06/13/84
993.01
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
30- 4254 - 781 -78
3Z
170354
LI 61131p4
47.17
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
40- 4254- 801 -80 ;,'
7
111NNEAP-OLI-S-GAS-C_O
_HEAT
50 -4254- 841 -84 •I
170354
06/13/84
69.67
MINNEAPOLIS GAS
CO
HEAT
___ _____ __!.
50- 4254- 861 -86
I.
�.I
3,404.60 +
i4
170355
06111/34
363.54
PINNSOTA BEARING
CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
"IJ0
170355
06/11/ ?4
55.41
FINNSOTIA BEARING
CO
REPAIR PARTS
.
10- 4540 - 560 -56
- _-
37D3.5- 5_-
__- U6 /]1L °4
1fl6.27
MINNSn�gEARING CO
REPAIR PARIS_
_10- _4S_4Q- 54_Q�6 sal
40
1 17f1i ., TNr REPAIR PARTS 10 -454 56 !°
L R1 MINN MiNN TORO -QQ -56
125.61 + - - -- -- - - - - -- °;,,
9.60_ MLNNESOLA- 49NNEii GI=N SUPPLIES 20 -45Q4- 646 -64
- - - - - -- - - - --
72
9.60 + 7.1
7"
;
.. r f f r a -
- - - - -- -
-- - - - - --
--- - - -
- -- -
39
-- - - ;'+ -CKS --
.
- - --
V
170358
C6 /CV /84
2E4.25
3M ALARM
SERVICE
ALARM SERVICE
27- 4304 - 660 -66
I°
_ I-
7.0.P_- ______1
_135.
6./13155 --
39_S�-
3M Al eaM
SERVILE
ALA-SERV
'0- 4.304- 8_4_L- 84 - - --
- -- - -- - -- i°
I�,I
vl
323.75 r
I�
oz
.
- 170359 _ .. -.__
06711/8.4 - -_ -_
- 1 7.02____
M._INN___T_0RO__INC
GEN __
- 318 -30
170359
U6 /11 / ?4
104.21
MINN TORO
INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 318 -30 - --
- - -- - l
170359
06111184
2.77
MINN TORO
INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
1 17f1i ., TNr REPAIR PARTS 10 -454 56 !°
L R1 MINN MiNN TORO -QQ -56
125.61 + - - -- -- - - - - -- °;,,
9.60_ MLNNESOLA- 49NNEii GI=N SUPPLIES 20 -45Q4- 646 -64
- - - - - -- - - - --
72
9.60 + 7.1
7"
h - -I
1984 CITY OF EDINA
I�
(� __CHECK NC. DATE __-- AMOUN_T.__
170362- __— __C61Ce/84_
" 170362 06/08/94
11
170366
170366
' _ • f f ► • •
` 170370
170370
CHECK REGISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 14
VE- NDOR.__ .____. __ITEA__D.ESCRIP_TION_ AC_C0UN_T—N.O._INVf _ p_P.O._.p MESSAGE
MODEL — STON--- CCM.PANY _ONCRETE 10 -_ 4528 301 -30__— _i4 `
950.79 MODEL STONE COMPANY CONCRETE 30- 4528 - 783 -78
19420.57 f n
7
fff —CKS —
IO
II �
6/_1.3/?4 - -- 010-00 BERT REBE_LD POLICE SERV 10-4100--4.2-0--4.2 _12
100.00 •
I-
06/12/94.___ __. -_
- -_ 229959
__M- INNESOTA_.BAR_
06/17./84
458.95
MINNESOTA BAR
06/12/f4
544.19
MINNESOTA BAR
50m4632-842-84
170376
06/8/84
130.J0
MICLAND PRODUCTS CO
06/13/84
323.40
MICLAND PRODUCTS CC
- -- -- -
453.40 •
°i
yr -�
•rfii•
114
INVENTOR RY
50- 4632 - 822 -82
fff —CkS
INVENTORY
50m4632-842-84
170376
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
;y
GEN SUPPIES
10- 4504- 335 -30
�27
\
°i
170376
-'21
CKS-
155.00
CONT REPAIRS
—
20- 4248- 646 -64
------ -.fif—
- - ^'l`
=
CONCESSIONS
26- 4624- 684 -68—
-
2f)9.1(1
—
yr -�
•rfii•
fff —CkS
'b a.
170376
06/C8/R4
54.10
MODERN EQUIPMENT
GEN SUPPIES
10- 4504- 335 -30
°i
170376
06/08/84
155.00
MODERN EQUIPMENT
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
27 - - - - --
-
2f)9.1(1
—
1 ?'
•ffiai
ff4— K_ S
C
37
3e
177378
06/13/84
49682.86
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
170378
J6/12184
79831.35
MARK V11 SALES INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
_-
170373— _____.
]5112L!L4
—e. 4 -93
MARK V11_SALES -INC
INVENTORY
"
'144!
\
"
21 •079.14 •
<9I
-
__--
J0
•if.ff
170380
i46/08/84
29799.75
SERVICES
10 -4100- 220 -22
THOMSEN NYBECK
V "'
170381
_170331
06/13/84
06/08/84.___233.79
202.10
STAR 8 TRIBUNE
_STpR -6 TR _LBUNEADVERTIS_L�G
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 140 -14
_23- 4214_ - 610_ -61
al.
435.89 •
— •f
- -- C K S- —
X60
-
•
— — - -
- - -- - - - -- - --
17C385
06/13/84
240.00
MCCUIRE ROBERT
TREE INSPECTION
10- 4242- 353 -30
fz
_.___170385
-_ ____..
06/13/.8.4_______
_3612 -00
MCGUI.RE— ROBERT —
CON.TRACT_INSPECTION_—
60 -1 300- 010- 18.________-
170385
060F13/94
360.00
MCGUIRE ROBERT
CONTRACT INSPECTION
60- 1300 - 011 -18
b0
960.00
"._.
_____06/13184.___
— 60_._2.5_
NORTHNEST_ERN__BELL -
__PHONE
—10- 4226- 160 -16
;1
.
170396
06/13/84
39248.38
NCRTHNESTERN EELL
PHONE
10 -4256- 510 -51
�wll 171
170396
06/13/84
193.62
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
20- 4256- 622 -62
75
W 41
1984 OF -- -DINA CHECK r._.,ISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 15
.-- ._C1±ECK _NC.
DATE__
AMOUNTVEND_OP
ITE.M__D.ESCLLe_TIQN-
ACCOUNT NO. _INV. -__11_ P.O. -- [__MESSAGE
- - -•_
�ll 2 170396
06/13/84
129.76
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
20- 4256- 628 -62
-
S`9 N- C- FT_H.6ESTERK_SELL
P_NONE -_
3I
17f'396
llh/13/84
1 •981. 09-
�
NORTHWESTERN P._LL
CCRRECTICN
c
20- 42.6- 629 -62
II
170390
06/13/84
191.09
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
20- 4256- 629 -62
t
;
-` _170396 __ --
.. 06/1304
- _3.7_.92
- _N- ORT.HWESTERN_.BELI -
-PHONE
20- 4256 - 646 -64
7
170396
06113184
14700
hCFTHWESTERK BELL
PHONE
_
23- 4256- 611 -61
J4
° 170396
06/13/?4
48.72
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
26- 4256 - 689 -68
- 1Z.0.346____
L'6J.13184_
I6.0._64
N!?RTMWEST_R.N- BELL --
PHONE
21T_42.56- .661 -_66- _
2
"I 170396
06/13/84
331.74
hCFTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
28- 4256 - 708 -70
170396
06/13/84
47.77
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
29 -4256- 721 -72
-1.703.96 _ _
_05/13184._ _- ._--
__- 171_9.30_
_NORTHWESTERN_ BELL- _--PHONE
30- 4256- 782 -78
i
" 170396
06/13184
95.11
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
40- 4256- 801 -80
170356
16/13/14
127.13
NCFTHWESTERh BELL
PHONE
50 -4256- 821 -82
__N.OR_TH.kE_STER.N_BELL..-
PHO.NE
° 170396
J6/130'84
118.54
NORTHWESTERN BELL
PHONE
50- 4256- 861 -86
121
59476.57 +
2._
J'
rra- CKS - -
- I
i
-L - -- 170.4.02_ - ____x_61
LtLB 4_-
7 7.1_
N n TL C_DMPAN_Y .
cEN-SUPPL TES
1D-4 524- 39 Q- 30
-
<<
i_
77.71 r
-- - --
iiv
'
2� ffr ►fa
- - -- - - - - -
-- -- --
--- --- - -
rrr- CKS
,,:
,_�
- - --
- -- -
-- - -- -
-- - -
-I,��
17C412
06/11/84
41 *92
KW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENT SUPPLIES
23- 1209- 000 -00
I :?
2_7�_L7��12_
!'6t131R4
-, 7Q.R7
NY GRAPHIC`$LePLY
LNVE.N _TOLZY -�- 23�2.O�QO��QO
,I
62.69 +
- - - - - --
_ -`�
37
I3r
-
N_A.TIONWID.E-PAP -ERS
GEN_SUPP-LI.ES
2 4.50_4- 66� -46_ -
21.14 r
- --
- -- - - -- -
-i.r
3-
4
3A
170420
36/12/84
252.60
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CNCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
ICfI^
- ! - -
- -
2.52_.
,,-
--
--
�,'
raraaa
rrr -CKS
3,`.
170420
06/•08/ ?4
990.35
PEFSI COLA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
73I
" 170429
C6/12/?4
372.60
PEPSI COLA BCTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
--170429
06/12/84__
547.20_-
PEFSI__COLA- 8OTTLING-__--
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
170479
u6/12/84
502.05
PEFSI COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
2.411 .90 r
c
rrr -CKS
{{
iE
-- - 170.431 _
._06111L84
$_.$2_ -_
MO- NG_SUPPLY
SU.P_ LIES
10- 4504- 520- 52_
5J�
I4,
802 •
___
-G.EN
-_-
- - - - - --
J
e
°1I ff4f f
- --
f...CKS
r'
--
---
53 170441
U6/13/84
308.00
THE PRINT SHOP
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
I; °I°
_
308_.D9 _+
7-
r`.:" •aafaa
+►r - CKS
7c`
J
U
L
1984 CITY
cucow ncszo7cn
06~14~84
pxsc vo
m*.o5 °
oxTc ---��_-
muuxz
Vcmon� _-ITE.m_D%oCB
8.13
mm°_ImV° w-9*.O° w
pEooAoE---_-_
"�
�~
10~4540~560~56
u6 /12 153 4
39730.31
ncx nrnr
INvcmrnnv
50~46 30~842~8 *
4o2
1.7-04.63-
170463
,rn* v 3
| |---'-
np cnzNx
�^1
cucow ncszo7cn
06~14~84
pxsc vo
m*.o5 °
oxTc ---��_-
muuxz
Vcmon� _-ITE.m_D%oCB
8.13
mm°_ImV° w-9*.O° w
pEooAoE---_-_
"�
�~
10~4540~560~56
u6 /12 153 4
39730.31
ncx nrnr
INvcmrnnv
50~46 30~842~8 *
u*/12/84
49029.96
120.15 °
INVENTOR
xo~**so~maa~oo
oomz/w
2050.80
�~
oznT cumc
Twxc^rnnv
:0~4630~822~82
7049 3
_-.uonzvo*-
"
,
-'---�----�
---------------�--
-----------
4630~842~8 4
_-�-__-_ -_-___
*°^~ovs'
"
185.05
06m1v84
81.9?
Pzomccn RIM u w*ccL
ncpAzn pxmro
10~4540~560~56
-|
~��.
'
"
79928.25 °
"}
' ".»
"
r *o
'^|
'"|`
uamv/v*
56.57
oI7cuxr
ncpxzn pAnro
10~*5*0~560~56
�� ------�'`
56.57
~ ~
|.°
^°°~cvs
~'
^
-
170467 06n2m4 aza.^o nnv^L acxcxAsc co Imwcm7onY 50~46 30~82 2~8 2
no*ar 06/12/o4 722.40 pn,xL ocxEnmoc CO zwxcmoxv 50~4e30~842~8*
-/--�17046 7 _�o��axxf-__ �ns"«V-� n�vx�-m�Vcwxwc_mo ___- a~���_ua
- ��--------� ------ -'-----^'-��''"~^ ' --
'--
|' s oovopw* e2.33 nuprmrooc Jo*mnnm rnnLo 10 ~*5 80~30 1~30 �������- --
33 170470 06/13/84 25.00 DR ROCKWELL MEDICAL SERWICES 10-4100-481-4E
_ 62.33 °
[--__zco4�u z __u�x�
mz_mc
!.' oo no
, ^ °
�^1
_m-oxLco___-IoVL
s.no-__�____'
m*.o5 °
� !�
- —
,.
--
8.13
~
.�
°°^~cxu
"�
�~
10~4540~560~56
u6 /12 153 4
39730.31
ncx nrnr
INvcmrnnv
50~46 30~842~8 *
u*/12/84
49029.96
ncx orur
INVENTOR
xo~**so~maa~oo
oomz/w
2050.80
soor*mzoc
oznT cumc
Twxc^rnnv
^
-
170467 06n2m4 aza.^o nnv^L acxcxAsc co Imwcm7onY 50~46 30~82 2~8 2
no*ar 06/12/o4 722.40 pn,xL ocxEnmoc CO zwxcmoxv 50~4e30~842~8*
-/--�17046 7 _�o��axxf-__ �ns"«V-� n�vx�-m�Vcwxwc_mo ___- a~���_ua
- ��--------� ------ -'-----^'-��''"~^ ' --
'--
|' s oovopw* e2.33 nuprmrooc Jo*mnnm rnnLo 10 ~*5 80~30 1~30 �������- --
33 170470 06/13/84 25.00 DR ROCKWELL MEDICAL SERWICES 10-4100-481-4E
_ 62.33 °
[--__zco4�u z __u�x�
mz_mc
!.' oo no
, ^ °
�^1
°^"-c*a
� !�
- —
,.
--
8.13
~
.�
°°^~cxu
"�
�~
10~4540~560~56
�!
_
c*n
=\
°.~
_-__-----_-�-_�°°^~cwo
� !�
170*92
06xco/°4
8.13
sonr*nncc
rnno
ncpArn pxpro
10~4540~560~56
=|
7/~
] no*vn
oomz/w
2050.80
soor*mzoc
oznT cumc
Twxc^rnnv
:0~4630~822~82
7049 3
_-.uonzvo*-
a°AU__-_--_SnwImazoc_nIoI_cnzwc__--_zwxcmrn
4630~842~8 4
,'
L` vro*pn
06v12ve4
185.05
mnurwmroE
ozmr cuzmC
zmwcmruRr �
s0-omoQ-m*a~aa
- ----- '"al
-|
~��.
79928.25 °
"}
' ".»
^ . CHECK ' ^-_' 06~14~84 ~p*E ,,
^ ( -_-cuccxmo oxrc -_-_� >�
�.r ^- --DATE------ 'zI ° w p.o9 w ncoouoc /-
�
�
�
3
L
170503
06/C8/84
44.52
SUBUR8AN PLUMB SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
20-45 04- 64 6- 64
17 05 C 3
C6 /0 8/84
13.05
SUFURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
30-4540 781-78
1705C3
06/11/84
58.17
SUFURBAN PLUMB SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
40-4504-801-80
170505
06/C8/84
33.56
SUN
ADVERTISING
10-4210-140-14
170505
06/12fP4
25.00
SUN
GEN SUPPLIES
20-4504-627-62
170508
06/11/84
8.77
ST PAUL
GEN SUPPLIES
27-4504-661-66
170514
06/11/84
60.00
SOUTHWOST' CLINIC
PHY EXAM
10-4246-520-52
170524
C6/C8184
146.04
7URNQUIST PAFER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-526 52
170539
06/12/84
144.00
TURF SUPPLY COMFANY
SOD 9 BLACK orRT
27-4562-662-66
170541
06 iC-8 /84
8 032'
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
27-4504-661-66
170541
06/11/84
44*94
TARGET
PAPER SUPPLIES
27-4514-661-66
�wv�w^vwr �u~�uun mma~ma '
° ~
��
176.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIF-ORMS-UNLIMITED
413.15 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
1,717.80
UNIFORM ALL06 10- 4266- 420 -42
UNIFORM_ALL -06- 10- 4266 - 421 -42—
UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 460 -46
1J
170549
06/08/84
�rr
`vI
I
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE.____.
_- CHE:CK NC.
DATE ._
05/12/94
-- 170441
06/02/84 _
06/12/84
VANGUARD
170548
17C548
u6/11/84
C6 /11 /24
06/12/84
J4
176.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIF-ORMS-UNLIMITED
413.15 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
1,717.80
UNIFORM ALL06 10- 4266- 420 -42
UNIFORM_ALL -06- 10- 4266 - 421 -42—
UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 460 -46
1J
170549
06/08/84
�
I
170550
06/11/84
0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE.____.
r
170551
05/12/94
170563
__170551
06/12/84
VANGUARD
- - LIO_SALE.S
170551
06/12/84
176.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIF-ORMS-UNLIMITED
413.15 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
1,717.80
UNIFORM ALL06 10- 4266- 420 -42
UNIFORM_ALL -06- 10- 4266 - 421 -42—
UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 460 -46
CHECK REGISTER
• • • • • •
C6 -14 -84 PAGE 18
0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE.____.
r
11i,259.R5
+
170563
2
_30.0.0
VANGUARD
- - LIO_SALE.S
50- 3610 - 001 -GO
J4
170563
+r• -CKS
30.00
VANGUARD
34_.80
* _ -_ -THE- PRINT _SHOP___.____._— __CONT_.SER.V
-
_10- 4200 - 500 -50_
58.00
THE PRINT SHOP
PRINTING
—_
10 -4600- 140 -14
VANGUARD
LIG SALES
193EO.95
TFE PRINT ShOP
PRINTING
23 -4600- 610 -61
to
7�170563
" z L
01.438.95
11.56 V.ANGUAR.O
CONT._SER-kL
—
170563
06/13/'34
7.85
VANI;UAR0
23.05
TWIN CITY ENGINE
LAUNDRY
10 -4540- 560 -56
17n563
06/13/84
23.29
VANCUARD
CCNT SERV
50 -4200- 860 -86
85.53
TISDEL STANDARD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
'.gI
8 5_.53
. _ _
»c
176.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIF-ORMS-UNLIMITED
413.15 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
1,717.80
UNIFORM ALL06 10- 4266- 420 -42
UNIFORM_ALL -06- 10- 4266 - 421 -42—
UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 460 -46
• • • • • •
• • • -CKS
B1
170563
06113/84_.___.____
_30.0.0
VANGUARD
- - LIO_SALE.S
50- 3610 - 001 -GO
170563
06/13/24
30.00
VANGUARD
LIG SALES
5C- 3610- 002 -00 --
-
J6/13/84
30.00
VANGUARD
LIG SALES
50- 3610 - 003 -00
7�170563
_17_0.5_63_.--
6J-J,3-/8A-
11.56 V.ANGUAR.O
CONT._SER-kL
170563
06/13/'34
7.85
VANI;UAR0
CONT SERV
50- 4200 - 840 -84
i2
17n563
06/13/84
23.29
VANCUARD
CCNT SERV
50 -4200- 860 -86
;
»c
�-
ff t•fi
i+• -CKS
170574
06/12/94
933.17
W G PEARSON
SAND GRAVEL ROCK
20 -4521- 642 -64
i
933.1 7 •
*•• —CKS
—
]Z!'S.LS__.__
—L'6l BLP_4
_—_— �0... 54
Y.I1.L�.AMS._STEE.L- H[!WE—
S,EN._S_UP _PLIES
1 -0- 45.04- 30_.1._30__---
170579
:;6/08/84
55.97
WILLIAMS STEEL —HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
__
20- 4504 - 646 -64
—____
6-
66.51 •
6,
- - -- --
***-CPS
—
X7.03.82____
- -- 0.6112113 4
RD4.26
604.26 *
r,QgDON SMrTH r9
GAS9LINE
27- 4612 - 662 -66 -
- ----
E ��
-',;,I
v
62
I'
• i t f i i
-- -- - --
-- _—
- - -—
------- -- - - --
- - - - - -- - - - - -
-- - --•r• —CKS —
�,
170596
06/08/84
9972
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
fA
,
�IA
170587
-- - - -- --
06/13194
— - - - --
87.63
F�6�•
WEIGLE SUE
MILEAGE
20- 4208 - 600 -60
72
,
visa,
—
- --
-- - - --
• •• -CKS
•v
u
1984 OF ECINA CHECK ,,- oISTER 06 -14 -84 PAGE 19
% CHFCK__.N.O.__DAT_E__ -___ 4KOIJNL - V_END_0_�. -. _LTE11._DES�BIP_T1QN A�COU�lI�10_s_SN_V. A- �._0_. _A_MESSAGE - J
n I�z
'_I 70`-40- L 61131-8.4 _ 1.09_,Qa HEKRY-- URO_ B.LES.KT- _- _- P-OL.ICE-S.ES11
4
5 15
L..° 170593 06/08/84 189.00 kNNESOTA CLAY IKVENTORY SUPPLIES 23- 1209 - 000 -00 I10
-- ht
•RfRR• �f4.
+ff -CKS
170605 06/12/84 84.87 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY RANGE BALLS 27- 4636 - 663 -66
84.87 •
.r
17 *•• -CKS '
]7 -0613 _ __. G6/1 1-/F4 E6.43__--- _KCKEI.LUS_STEEL GEN_SUPP- LIES- _____- 10- 4504- 30.1 -30_
I 170613 J6/11184 50.00 MCNEILUS STEEL GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64
`I 136.43 +
z�
l�l"
*-C Rs - --
I'rC
Z"l-1-70706__- _06 /GE_[_84 1._+56,32 -. ALt .S_LA(-- C_LEAAIING -_ _ C-ONT_RE.PA -IRS 10- 4248 - 52.0- 5_2_ --
1 9056.32 + - - - -- - - - --
°
7i -Z 7o7_ r.6 -LE"P4 - U- ...81- _GARLAAD.S ANC _ GF_N-SyQP1IES 10 455 90 -30 I3R
° 170707
.9� U6/08/84 40.96 GARLANDS INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54
L 118.77 + - - - --
°I 30
170708
06/08/84
170709 X6/08/84
17c7lo 061o8/84
80.70 NS CONCRETE COMP
80.70 •
125.31 GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
125.31 •
30.23 FARWELL OZMUN KIRK
30.23 •
PIPE
GEN SUPPLIES
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4550- 801 -80
20- 4504- 646 -64
10 -4504 - 301 -30
fff
Id0 i
47
4
1418/84
214.00
CRYSTAPLEX PLASTICS
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 708 -70
132
214.00 +
54
I"
170712
,.
G6/C8/84
2„142.80
DECKER SUPPLY
SIGNS POSTS
10- 4542 - 328 -30
- -
2.1 42.80 +
iS3
fa
°
`d
170713
U6 /08 /F4
36.UO
GREATER MPLS AREA
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 200 -20
?6.00 •
102
60
_
170714
06/08/84
59486.50
VOGEL PAINT 8 WAX CO
PAINT
-
10- 4544 - 335 -30
- - -- - - - °.,
59486.50 *
` 170715
'
06/C8/84
320.63
KELLY 6ERVICES
CCNT SERV
10 -4200- 440 -44 -
-- - - - -•r
170115
u6/13/84
256.50
KELLY SERVICES
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 440 -44
70
543.60
KELLY ERyl_CES
_�QNT$ -ER_Y
10- 4200 - 490 -49
7
1.120.73 +
R7 i7n716 _
i,6108 /84
1 7_50
ROBERT LI�B�RMAN
4EFUND
28- 5415-Q00�00
175
- -�,,
`.I
~' 1984 CITY CF EOI�A
raj
_.___CHECK_ -NO. DATE
CHECK REGISTER
ENDO_R -___ -- ITE.M_DESCRIPILON ALCOIINT N-Q_._INWe
06 -14 -84 PAGE 20
# -PLO. _ N - MESS AGE
,.
- 1
3
06/08/84
73.09
_2- 9617.54 *
17.50
•
ROOM B BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
z
'3
170717
G6 /0P /P4
1.679.59
INTERLACHEN CTY CLUB
CONT SERY
"
170128
10- 4200 - 500 -50
"I
HENN CTiY
TREASURER
ROOM & BOARD
19679.59
*
"
I,
%6 /CF /P4.
4995.76__
_ HENN_ CTY_
TREASURER_- __-
_- _- _- ROOM_8_BCARD_
10 -4286- 220 -22
I.I
170728
C6/C8/84
2r676.p4
HENN C'TY
170718
]6/08/84
644.00
WIZARD DESIGN
CONT SERY
10- 4200 - 500 -50
170728
06/08/84
2,168.50
�I
TREASURER
ROOM & BOARD
644.00
+
7072 8_
__L.6LC8L8.4
_9-5.17_ ?-
X10
170719
06/08/84
6.00
EDINA GIRL SCOUT
DOUBLE PAYMENT
10- 4200 - 500 -50
"
15,979.94 *
12
6.00
•
"'
L�
�
'D 170739
06/08/84
188Q�000/0
0-ARLES YESCHKE
PCLYGRAPH SERY
10- 4224 - 422 -42
,o
51-24
— CAROLE_KU_LA .__-
�1ILEAGE- _
v-
3I
170740
J6/08/84
170722
C6/�]8/84
1-.,495_,00
_ HUDAIL_P_RINTERS_____ .
___PRI_NT_ING __—
27- 4600 - 660- 66____
`
-- -- - .
- — - - --
— 3
1,495.00
•
= - -�
170741
176/08/84
352900
12 -.0.0_
r1RGER- GON.SJ
_C_CN_T__SERU
30- 43�.Q- 7$0 -7$_
- --
I`I
125.00
•
- -_- _-
-
11072.4_
0.6/78/x4__.._
482 06
_ __T_QMHAWK.- LIYE._ TRAP_- _-
_- GEN_SUPP_LIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47___
482.06
*
_ - --
- -- - -
-
"-
1LOL25__
361L8L8 4
5, _4_
FAST FOJO
_RRIATIR
23 -4600n61 Ot6l
_
0
170125
06/OP./?4
5.14
FAST FOTO
PRINTING
23- 4600- 610 -61
37
- is �,
'
10.28
3..
I _
I'
170726
06/08/84
200.00
ROBERT SCBCCUTAK
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61'
'3
200.00
•
I..I
170727
96/48/84
1,910.74
SHERIFFS DEFT
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226- 421 -42
^
sl
170727
C6 /CF /84
137.09
SF- ERTFFS DEPT
ROOM B BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
_
179727
349.54
SHERI.FES__OEFT —___
_ROOM_ &_BOARD_
10 -4286- 220 -22__
I� '
170727
06/GF/F4
157.08
SHERIFFS DEFT
ROOM & BGARO
10 -4286- 220 -22
�v u
7_j 170727
3c
06/08/84
73.09
_2- 9617.54 *
SHERIFFS
DEFT
ROOM B BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
._
170128
J6/08184
4,751.09
HENN CTiY
TREASURER
ROOM & BOARD
10- 4286 - 220 -22
"i___1.7072E
%6 /CF /P4.
4995.76__
_ HENN_ CTY_
TREASURER_- __-
_- _- _- ROOM_8_BCARD_
10 -4286- 220 -22
I.I
170728
C6/C8/84
2r676.p4
HENN C'TY
TREASURER
ROOM & BCARO
10 -4286- 220 -22
170728
06/08/84
2,168.50
HENN CTY
TREASURER
ROOM & BOARD
10 -4286- 220 -22
7072 8_
__L.6LC8L8.4
_9-5.17_ ?-
FENN CTY
TREaS.URER
RO0_M_"QARD
10 86- 220-22 -
-- 60
.
15,979.94 *
(I
62
i r r r f i
�
'D 170739
06/08/84
188Q�000/0
0-ARLES YESCHKE
PCLYGRAPH SERY
10- 4224 - 422 -42
521
v-
3I
170740
J6/08/84
35.58
FYA /MOdARCM
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 664 -66
`
-- -- - .
- — - - --
— 3
170741
176/08/84
352900
THE LYNDE.COMP
GEN SUPPLIES
20- 4504- 642 -64
I
�v u
170752 x6/11/84
170753- - 06/11/84 -
Y 'I 170753 36/11/84
760.73 LABOR RELATIONS
760.73 +
15.00 ASSOC OF METRO
15.,00 ASSOC OF METRO
CONT SERV
MEETING EXPENSES
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4200- 140 -14
10 -4206- 100 -10
10 -42C6- 140 -14
S'
170754
06/11/84
14.27
VOTING MACHINE SERV
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 180 -18
110755
06/11/84
388.80
1984
Y OF EDINA
10- 4504- 318 -30
CHECK _LISTER
06 -14 -84
PAGE 21
_LAGNU_SON- SIlO_L.OMP
S- O"- L.AC- K -.DLBT
20 -4562- 642 -64
I
"I
AC9U3 T___ --
_VE.NDO.S
I�E.M_O.ES�1IP110N_
AC_ COON?- N. O.._ LftY .- 11_P.O.__i!_MESSAGE-
___ -_��
w
2
352.00
.170756
'
63.67
DEFT CF PROPERTY
PCSTAGE
10- 4290 - 180 -18
'
170742
C6 /CE /E4
84.00
dINNY POE
IAST FEE ART C
23 -4100- 614 -61
>I
84.00
+
7
nl
- - -
- - --
170743
- - -- - --
06/08/84
- -
60.00
- - - - -- - - --
PAM BONZELET
- - --
INST FEE ART
------------
23- 4100- 614 -61
- - -��
�
60.00
•
`
170744
!s6/OE/84
144.00
MARGARET MCDOWELL
INST FEE ART
23- 4100 - 614 -61
-
144.00
+
2
- - --
--
170745
-
06/11/84
13.53
ENTEC INC
_
INVENTORY
23- 1209 - 000 -00
17
�.
1
13.53
+
- -
'"
"
170746
06/11/R4
17.50
AUTO SOUND INC
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
ho�.
j21
�.
17.50
`0I
170747
06/11./84
53945
INDUSTRIAL SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 328 -30
53.45
+
170748
76/11/84
235.20
235.20
NELSON RADIO COMM
•
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
.I 170749 06/11/84 977.00 STERLING FENCE GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64
"7j
S
977.00
170750
06/11/84
46.54
TWIN CITY ELEVATOR
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 520 -52
46.54
*
_
!
170751
06/11/84
18.00
MARILYN HALVERSON
CLASS REFLKD
23 -3500- 000 -00
18.00
+
; T
170752 x6/11/84
170753- - 06/11/84 -
Y 'I 170753 36/11/84
760.73 LABOR RELATIONS
760.73 +
15.00 ASSOC OF METRO
15.,00 ASSOC OF METRO
CONT SERV
MEETING EXPENSES
MEETING EXPENSES
10 -4200- 140 -14
10 -4206- 100 -10
10 -42C6- 140 -14
S'
170754
06/11/84
14.27
VOTING MACHINE SERV
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 180 -18
110755
06/11/84
388.80
PAGNUSON SOD COMP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 318 -30
207._0
_LAGNU_SON- SIlO_L.OMP
S- O"- L.AC- K -.DLBT
20 -4562- 642 -64
I
"I
170755
06/11/84
340.26
PAGNUSON SOD COMP
GEN SUPPLIES
20- 4562 - 642 -64
936.66 +
.170756
06/11/84
63.67
DEFT CF PROPERTY
PCSTAGE
10- 4290 - 180 -18
63.67 s
170757 06/11/84 145.00 EDGER BEAVER TREE TREE REMOVAL 60- 1300 - 002 -18
145.00
170758 '.:6/11/84 18.04 CARLSON EQUIP CO PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56
18.04 +
4
4�
I51
52
54
tl "
co
J51
6J
i; L I .
-- - -'_`I
- - - -I=`'
C.
-I 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER C6 -14 -84 PAGE 22
------CHECK-NC. ❑ATE_...- _____.- _._AMO.UN_T- - VENDOR ---- _ TTEM__QEsf!RTPII.ON AC_CO_UNLNO.-I-NV *- #- P__ *_0._p MESS
17C.7-5.9_ _ 16-/1.1-18.4_ __- ]_D{1.50 AL' ERLICE-STAT -LCN REPAIR -PARTS 1.0 53 -&0 4.0_5_4 - -_ -_
100.50
J l i
__...1707.6C
170173
_ j6/11/!4._ -- ____
-_ _1.6..00__-
_J._ ZI ITT EL -GREEK hCUSE___-
GEN_SUPP_L_IES
10 -4504- 390 -30_ -_
170760
06/11784
239.50
J ZIITTEL GREENfOUSE
GEN SUPPLIES
__
10- 4504 - 390 -30
255.50 *
0
170161
1.6/11/84
60.75
ROCT 0 MATIC
REPAIR PARTS
30- 4540 - 781 -78
`.,
- 170774.__.._-
.-- J6/12/F4 -_
60.75 *
ROYAL- CRONN_BEV
- INVENTORY
-- 50-4630- 842-84
-�
170762
06/11/84
60.00
ROLLIN B CHILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 390 -30
"j
170774
06112184
60.00
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
170763
:76/11/14
263.10
LAND CARE B EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
263.10 *
170764
U6/11/84
141.94
H 0 FROEMMING
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 301 -30
141.94 •
Z
170765
06/11784
24.00
FALM BROTHERS
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 661 -66
24.00 *
17D766
06/11/84
19597.40
METRO TRUCK BODY
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
19597.40
27
170767
:;6/11/84
431.37
BARETT MOVING
FREIGHT
10 -4292- 184 -18
�. �9
431.37 r
999!9.
- 170!_69_ -__
1i61_12LQ4__
U-35
PRINT
PRINTI-Na
27- 0_ - 1-66 -
77.35
-
_170770 -
_06112/8.4
255._00 _O�Y_DIST_
xNVENTORY
50- 4630- 862- 86______
255.00
-___
-
_1.7077.] _
____06!1318.4
2�5._42,.3i
G,R,.IGGS- _BEER -_- _
-_ INVENTORY_
5Q- 4630.- _822 -82
170771
06/12/84
59999.10
GRIGGS BEER
INVENTCRY
50 -4630- 842 -84
'I
170111
06/12/84
599.10
GRIGGS BEER
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 842 -84
1.70771
06/12/84_ -__
-_ _ 599.10_
6RIGGS_BF_FR ____ ___CORRECTION
50 -4630- 842 -84
170771
06/12/84
39941.55
GRIGGS BEER
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 862 -86
12 9490.00 •
170772
06/12184
108.50
ULMER METRO DIST INC
00
50- 4630 - 822 -82
170772
U6/12/84
108.50
ULMER METRO DIST INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
- - - - -- -
- - - - -- - --
2.1.0.0_
,
z
-1°
,o
„
1,,3
a
- -- ---- - - - - -- -'17
3
_,72
*r* -CKS - is
43
- - -- ias
Is' -
'cc
-Oi
170173
06/12/84
21.05
DOUBLE COLA
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
cOLRLF CCU A _
- ZAV_EA►TARY
50- 4¢32 - X42 -84
- - ___._____ -.
75.55 •
- 170774.__.._-
.-- J6/12/F4 -_
408_.R5
ROYAL- CRONN_BEV
- INVENTORY
-- 50-4630- 842-84
-�
170774
,]6/12/84
129 *35
RCYAL CROWN BEY
INVENTCRY
50- 4632- 822 -82
"j
170774
06112184
517.20
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
17
iJ1 y
1984 'L OF FOINA
_.__ CHECK KC. DATE--
_A-P-00-T —
CHECK i, STTR 06-14-84 PAGE 23
INV. 0 P.O. I PESSAGE
39.2-0 LpiS w
19055.40
170175
06/12184
329*70
CCNAGPUE DOORS
EQUIP PAINT
50 -4274- 821 -82
329.70 •
170776
06/12/94
43.63
MOLLIE PAULSON
ART WORK SCLD
23- 4200 - 610 -61
43.63
170777
06/12/84
124*00
THOMAS L TODD
AMBULANCE REFUNC
10-3180-000-00
124.00
170778
06/12/84
40.80
PAM BONZELET.
ART WORK SCLD
23-3625-000-00
40.80 *
170779
u6/12/84
4400
JO FRENCH
ART WORK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
170780
06/12/84
23.40
PARY HCAGLUNC
ART WORK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
23.40 •
170781
06/12/84
9.30
IRMA KURMTS
ART WORK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
9.00 •
170792
U6/12/84
7*28
JOHN ACOSTA
ART WORK SCLO
23- 3625- 000 -00
7.28 •
2C
170783
F-170783
06/12784
5.02-
FAT GREER
CCRRECTICN
23-3625-000-00
C6/12/84
5.25
PAT GRLIER
ART WOFK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
- I
-1 79783____
C 6 11-2 8_4
Wo_RK_SSL_D____
5.25
1-7-0 Z F 4
-EAF-E-ELE —
------ kP_T_M_O_RK__S_CLC......
V. - 3 6 25_nD"_- 0 0
80.78
_
-_ART W.QRK- _S_CL 0
23- 3625_ - 000- 00____
35.00
I 5..A(L—
AAR ARA LUN1lGfEN_
kg-T WO__pX_s_cL C
-2-3-n-3-6-2 5-_0 OR - kCL-
15.40
170781
06/12/84
16.45
GA MAR mb_m_moWcLL_
ART WORK SCLO
23-3625-000-00
16.45
0_6J12/_P_4_ 15.75
__.ROSALTF
PAVLASF-K
_RT__WDm_S_cL_D_.
23-3 6 25- 000-0 0
15.75 •
-1-70789
ART _W_0 kK___S_CL_C - - - - - - -
— -- Z3-36Z5-�000-00
uo
29.00
!_l_Z0790
0.6/12/_84_
56.QO
KAY S_CliLOS.SER_
56.00
110191--
U.6.4t1_2f&4
6 o 3 0
__AA RI 0A_W ARD
6.30
39.2-0 LpiS w
r 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
-; 06 -14 -84 PAGE 24
CHECK NC. DATE AMOUN T. VENDOR.- ITEM- DESCRIPTION_ ACCOUNT NO..INY. # P.O. # FESSAGE
I
39.20
•
17C793
06/12/94
7j910.00
FCLAR CHEV B MAZOA
FICK UP TRUCK
10 -4908- 470 -47
�.
7,919.00
+
170794
J6/12/94
540 .0 0
MPLS i SUB SEWER B
CONT REPAIRS
30- 4248 - 783 -78
'i
540.00
+
11'1
17 ^795
X6/12/84
15. ^0
JOHN PODERGOIS
AMMUNITION
10- 4572- 420 -42
15.00
"
17 ^796
06/13/ ?4
52.00
PRS GEORGE MAY
SPRINKLER REPAIRS
10 -45C4- 318 -30
52.00
+
I"
I•;
17P707
U6/13/Q4
675.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
CONE 9-SCHOOLS
10 -4202- 140 -14
675.00
+
17079?
06/13/94
29.10
J F TNTER!ORS
CCNSTRUCTICN
60 -1300- 259 -C4
29.10
•
170799
J6/13i94
509243.00
FALLS B NYHUSNOEN
CONSTRUCTION
26- 1300 - 000 -06
_.
509243.00
+
170870
06/13/ ?4
-- 14.00
JANET CONDON
REG CANCELLED
20 -35L0- 000 -OC
14.00
+
I•.i -"
-.
17CR_ r 1
1:6/13/94
20.00
FRANCES EDELSCN
REG CANCELLEC
20 -350- 000 -OC
_
20.00
•
I.
170802
U6/13/84
14.00
MARY HUFF
REFUND
2G- 3500 - 000 -OC
�.I
14.00
•
170803
06/13/84
14.00
J R BAKER _
- REFUND- -- -
20- 3560 - 000 -00
_
14.100
r
17C9C4
06/13/ 04
16.00
RAREL POERSFELDER
REF LNO
20 -3500- 000 -00
16.00
+
172805
06/13/ ?4
16.70
L.ALRA ROBERTS
REFUND
2C- 3500 - 000 -OC
16.00
+
1703 ^6
06/13/94
16.00
CINDY FEGLEY
REFUND
20- 3500 - 000 -OG
17C8�7
J6/13i84
20.00
ECNNIE OSTBY
REFLNO
2C -3500- 000 -00
a�
20.00
+
1703 ?8
36/13/84
731.18
DANS REEGISTER SERV
CONST
26- 1300 - 000 -00
!+
731.18
+
1703 ^9
06/13/84
19906.00
CENTURY FENCE
PARK EQUIF
20- 4932 - 600 -60
1793J9
06/13/94
927.00
CENTURY FENCE
CONST
26- 1300 - 000 -00
. 2.gF33.00
--
I
d.d
1TC819
06/13/84
141.69
CONVEYORS
LUMBER
27- 4604- 661 -66
ti�
Nor
11)84
Y IF EDIN:
CHECt :ISTER
06 -14 -e, PAGE 25
t
CH_CK
AC. DATE
ANOUP.?. _..__ _-
VENDOR _ _
_ ITEM - C LESCRLP_T_I_ON_____..____
ACCOUNT_.NO. INV, # P.O. N PESSAG_
141 .69 r
e
170911
06/13/84
120.64
ROAD RESCUE INC
1ST AID SLPPLIES
10 -4510- 440 -44
170811
06/13/84
180.10
ROAD RESCUE INC
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
;(
��;
-
170,412
U6/13/84
-- 300.64 4-
61.34
- --
NAIL FIRE PROTECT
BOOKS
10 -4502- 440 -44
„(
170913
06/13/94
322.88
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES
10- 4120- 160 -16
170914
J6/13/R4
15 O
SHARON VERKEY
REFUND
26 -3415- 000 -00
- - -- --
- -- - - - - - -- - -- .--
----- - - - - -- 15.7.0.-=---
-------- - - - - -- --
'`J�'°
1'0815
J6/13/84
14.00
MRS CHARLES DEVRIES
CLASS CANCELLED
20- 3500 - 000 -00
-- 14.00
170816
06/13/84
14.00
ARLENE WILSON
CLASS CANCELLED
20- 3500- 000 -00
a
- - -- -- - — - . - - --
- -- 1..4_...09 —t -- -
- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - —
i
-1
170817
:76/13194
1,190.00
CAVE OLIVER
ELM REMOVAL
60 -1300- 002 -18
,
;�bi_'
170318
J6/13/84
120.00
N C T A
CABLE TV
10- 2149 - 000 -00
(�
170919
16/13184
1,607.75
ODLAND PROTECTIVE
PAYMENT
60- 2040 - 000 -OC
f:
-
__19607.75
170'32('
06/13/84
12,368.44
M 8 S ROOFING
PAYMENT
60 -2040- 000 -00
170821
:6/13184
289704.06
MICWEST PAVING
PAYMENT
6U -2040- 000 -00
(�
28,7C4.06_
�✓..i
CKS
______ __
1.65_,37_1.62_
FUND_ t0— TO_TAL.___
ERA L_FUNO
22,809.03
FUND 20 TOTAL
_GEN
PARK FUND
t�
3,679.53
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
549608.90 -.-
FLNO 26 TCTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
13,269.92
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
Ai P(�0'JED ICII rtil'P:'iE�4T,
4,238.38
FUND 2P TOTAL
RECREATICN CENTER FUND
-
- - - - -- -
- - - -- -- 2_47_.09 -------
F.UN�- _29 -- -TOTAL_..- -- --
-GUN_ RANGE_FUNC - - - --
- -- - - - --- —
CHECK
�'
229933.64
FUND 30 TOTAL
WATERWORK FUND
69530.68
FUND 40 TOTAL
SEWER RENTAL FUND
PAC,,:S
_
___112,033.91 _ ._
-_ FUND _50 TCTAL -
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FLkD__._
I
459782.48
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
6,,
,f
I. -
- -- - -- - - - - --
- - - -- -- — - -- - - -
- -- 451_,- 4Oi.t8 - -
- -- LCTAL—
Computer checks Vs 57115 thru 57362
_ _ _ _ - _
RIA•A�RGTGIitL 'rust DATE
'i
Hand typed 56579 thru 56582
56593 thru 56599
_
e� ITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
129067 C6/C5/84
129067 06/05/84
129067 06/05/84
#aaata
129135
129135
1291 35
129135
1291 35
1291 35
129135
1291 35
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
66/05/84
C6/C5/84
66/05/84
66/ ^5/84
C6 /C5 /84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
L;6/C5/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
X6/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/05/P4
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
66/05/84
C6/C5/84
AMOUNT
2.00-
7.65
247.35
253.00 +
13.37 -
6.32-
20.52-
4.79-
668.59
315.90
1 •C26.18
239.55
29205.22 •
15.92-
4.1 3-
4.84-
16.47-
67.37-
11.26-
5.64-
157.12-
39.36-
11.61-
242.00
39368.30
79855.90
796.05
206.50
823.75
563.00
281.90
1,967.89
580 .50
169351.97
66.54 -
66.77-
46.14-
39326.87
3,338.60
29306.86
8,792.88 •
CHE EGISTER 05 -3 PAGE 1
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
CAFITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED
F14ILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
129138
PHILLIPS
129138
ED
129138
50- 3710 - 822 -82
129139
PHILLIPS
1291 38
ED
129138
I
1291 38
PHILLIPS
129138
♦
129138
50 -4628- 842 -84
1291 38
PHILLIPS
1291 39
ED
129138
50 -3710- 822 -82
129138
PHILLIPS
1291 38
E7
1291 38
50- 3710- 842 -84
1291 38
PHILLIPS
1291 3R
ED
1291 38
50- 3710- 862 -86
129138
PHILLIPS
1291 39
ED
# ##RRa
50- 3710- 862 -86
1291 90
PHILLIPS
1291 90
ED
129190
�
1291 90
PHILLIPS
129190
ED
1291 90
�.
ED
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
66/05/84
C6/C5/84
66/05/84
66/ ^5/84
C6 /C5 /84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
L;6/C5/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
X6/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/05/P4
06/05/84
06/05/84
C6/C5/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
06/05/84
66/05/84
C6/C5/84
AMOUNT
2.00-
7.65
247.35
253.00 +
13.37 -
6.32-
20.52-
4.79-
668.59
315.90
1 •C26.18
239.55
29205.22 •
15.92-
4.1 3-
4.84-
16.47-
67.37-
11.26-
5.64-
157.12-
39.36-
11.61-
242.00
39368.30
79855.90
796.05
206.50
823.75
563.00
281.90
1,967.89
580 .50
169351.97
66.54 -
66.77-
46.14-
39326.87
3,338.60
29306.86
8,792.88 •
CHE EGISTER 05 -3 PAGE 1
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
CAFITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
ED
F14ILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 822 -82
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
E7
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
ED
PHILLIPS
MANUAL
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
aaa -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL -
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
-- -
aaa -CKS
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL ,
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL ,
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL ,
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL ,
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
• •• -CKS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
araa #.
� aaa —CKS ,
129271 06/05/84 .65- INTERCONTINENTAL PR 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL
�• 129271 06/05/84 1931- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL
V-
rrrrrr
- -'
129285
06/C5/84
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
WINE
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -84 PAGE 2
V,
14.02-
0314SON
W! NE
w=
129285
06/05/84
3.05-
C14ECK NC.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION——
__ ACCOUNT N0. INV._N
P.O. I MESSAGE
_ JOHNSON
129271
06105/84
159.93-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
WINE
129271
C6/05/84
3.61-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK _.- _
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
06/05/84
129271
06/05/84
9.88-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
JOHNSON
WINE
129271
06/C5/84
14.04-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -84_
MANUAL_
129285
06/05/84
129271
06/05/84
1.96-
INTERCONTINENTAL
_ ___50-3710-842-84
PK
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
JOHNSON
WINE
129271
06/05/84
5.18-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
94964-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�.
129271
06/05/84
1.31-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
`,•
129271
06/05/94
.90
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
06105/84
129271
06/05/84
32.70
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
4.50
129271
06/05/84
79996.88
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
25.30-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
180.75
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK _ _ _
_ 50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
49732.04
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
k.
129271
C6105/84
19.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
�"
129271
06/05/84
65.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
.30
INTERCONTINENTAL
_
PK
_
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
`„;
129271
06/05/84
.60
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
32.75
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK _ _
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
�-
129271
06/05/84
702.25
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06105184
494.48
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/04
8.40
_ _INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
4.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
_ _
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
_
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
98.25
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
129271
06/05/84
259.05 _
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
e
129271
06/05/84
.60
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
_ _
MANUAL
dl`
129271
06/05/84
65.50
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
129271
067135/84
3.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
129271
06/C5/E4
.90
INTERCONTINENTAL
_
PK
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
149381.24 •
I •'
rrrrrr
- -'
129285
06/C5/84
5.61-
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05/84
14.02-
0314SON
W! NE
w=
129285
06/05/84
3.05-
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05/84
11.06-
_ JOHNSON
WINE__
129285
06/05/84
3.23-
JOHNSON
WINE
LI
129285
06/05/84
5038-
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/C5/84
3.00
cOHNS CN
WINE
_
129285
06/05/84
_ _
701.00
JOHNSON
WINE
%w ,I
129285
06/05184
4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05184
280.62
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05/84
3.30
JOHNSON
WINE
~I i
129285
G6/05/84
152.70
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05/84
3.00
JOHNSON
WINE
129285 -
- C6105/84 ----
- - - - -- 553.45 --
- JOHNSON
WINE -- - - - --
'•I
129285
06/05/84
161.95
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06/05/84
1.50
JOHNSON
WINE
129285
06105/84
269.24
JOHNSON
FINE
129285
06/05/84
4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
cj rrrrrr
r `
_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 842 -84
50- 3710 - 842 -84
50- 3710- 842 -84
50 -3710- 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 4626- 842 -84
50- 4626- 842 -84
50 -4628- 822 -82
50 -46 28- 82 2 -82
- -- 50- 4628- 842 -84
50- 4628- 842 -84
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- -- 50 -4628- 842 -84 - --
50- 4628- 862 -86
_ -50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4628- 862 -86
50 -4628- 862 -86
U
r rr- C KS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
rrr - CKS
i
1
,
1;, '^Tv
or cnzwx
cxcL 4szaTcm
05~31
pxsc o
-�
cwccn Nn-.DATE
»��UhI___-_-'_-___�--«c�o��-_-_'___-_----%IEw
w°��poo°m.�pcmm4oc______/
'
'
--
!.
31
129451
06f05184
10.85-
QUALITY WINE
MANUAL
.4
129451
06f05/84
1.11
QUALITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
10ANUAL
129451
06/C5/84
9099-
GUALITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
129451
06/05/84
14*53—
GUALITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
129451
06/C5/04
31.04—
GUALITY WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
129451
06/C5/84
9.49—
GUALI TY WINE
MANUAL
129451
06/C5/84
3,721.15
QUALITY WINE
50-46 26— 84 2— 84
MANUAL
129451
C6/05/84
1*552.20
CUALITY WINE
50-4626-862-86
MANUAL
129451
06/C5/84
542o6O
GUALITY WINE
5.0-4628-822-82-
MANUAL
129451
06/05/84
55.69—
QUALITY WINE
50-46 28— 84 2- 84
MANUAL
i 1 7
129451
06/05f84
499.75
QUALITY WINE
50-4628-w842-84
MANU AL
129451
06105/84
474.22
GUALITY WINE
50-4628— 862-86
MANUAL
7,311 .79
129540
06/05/84
77.79-
TWIN CITY MINE
50-3700-842-84
MANUAL.-
129540
06/05/84
10017 -
TWIN'CITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
129540
06/C5/84
2.87—
TWIN CITY WINE
50-3710-842-84
MA4UAL
131
'^~-`
CITY
-'-'------------'-----
--�,l
- _---.
."�"°"
"","^,"°
� �.~,.
.~^~ ^^.. ~^~^
^.--. .- m�
^~ ~~
MANUAL
n
�u�n�o
ouvnsvp*
n.��
7urm cz7ruzmc
50~4628~8*2~84
nAmuxL
��~
!,
�
1295*0
oavcsvn4
719°25_
TWIN CITY. WINE
u~���o~m�a~m«
nwvuxc_�
1295*0
_
o*vos/m^
143.50
ruzm CITY uzmc
50~4628~842~84
nxmuxL
/
1295*0
06/05/84
1.80
rwzm CITY uzmc
50~**28~842~84
nxwuxc
!^�
� m��*o
o*/cs/n*
r°5o
Iuzm zmc
a_m«
pxwuAu
�a9�4� —
u6vC5v8*----�------
- ob----
°
Twzm'o��r-4xxc----'�---
^ o~*W��-m��~@�
numu�u
!^1
�
�°ams°o4
^.~
°^°~cwo
^]°
v05x84
na°rs
cxpzrxL czry ozornz
50~*628_822~82
_ mAmuxL__''
135067 -
0*v05v84 - ----'--
2°25 ---
--cxpzfo�-cIry ozwrn�- -------------------
�o~�aom~mo2~mo--
nxwwxL
^!
�ssoo�
c6vcsvno
vU°o0
cxpXrxL cz7r ozarnz
50~4628~842~84
nmmuuL
.
�
^ �n5o�
�
oa�Ovm*
656.39
CAPITAL CITY _�l��
50-4628-842.84----- _ -- __
MwmoxL
L.
7*2.19
'oISTmz'-
^"|
.=
_---
--- _-�-_---_.--__-
_._-____-
-_-'-___----__--- -
�---
°~c vs_
�
5129
c6/05v8*
39100.25
ocLLmor
50~4626~82 2~82
nxmuxL
�,..~
`~
5129
06/05v84
505.00
BELLBOY—— ~sq~�ao�~maa~xa_
_
_ nmvuxL _
.�|�
_
29
_
ooxUnvnu
son°oO
_ _ _
sccLenv
50~4626~8*2~84
nomuxL
p|
135129
n6v05x84
2,95e°80
BELLBOY
50~4626~843~84
nomuxL
1on1zv
oa�ysv��
118n6°05
_---_-_-mmmwx�_
�
|
�- '--'---'
- --
_
89 953.10
*w^~CvS
135135
05124v84
o°,u~
cxscs wovc cncmzr
50~3710~003~00
nxmuxL
vsnvon
061[5/84
ay.97~
cxons uxx
50-3710-842-.84
pxmuxu__
-��s1s�------�6»05vm4--'-----------
°1o'------
EAGLE -WINE
50- 3710-862-86
nmmwxc
135135
06x05x8*
35°85~
cxncE uzmc
50~3710~862~86 .
mxmuxc
��
�
1984 CITY
OF ECINA
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -31 -84 PAGE 4
+II
Ij
CHECK N0.
CATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM_ DES_CR_IP_TION__ __
______ACCOUNT N0. INV-
N P.O. 4 MESSAGE
r
135135
C6 /C5 /84
.16
EAGLE WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
i
135135
06/05/84
2 *198.55
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL ,
135135
C6 /05 /84
7.24-
EAGLE WINE
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
r!
135135
C6/G5/84
7.97-
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135135
C6/C5/84
1979207
EAGLE WIRE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
I"
135135
05/24/84
107.07
EAGLE WINE
INVENTORY - - - - "
- -- 50 -4632- 862 -86
- " MANUAL
4*001.12 +
_.
.++ -CKS
�I
135138
06/05/84
39.20-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3700- 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
06/05/84
2.78-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
ri
135138
C6/C5/84
64.43-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135138
06/05/84
11.89-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL •,
135138
06145/84
17.81-
ED PHILLIPS
_
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
135138
006/05/84
.30
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
-,
135138
06/05/84
-
62.43-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
I•
135138
06/05/84
28.30-
ED PHILLIPS" "
-- - - --
- 50- 3710- 842 -84 -
-- MANUAL
135138
C6 /C5 /Y4
3.69-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
C6105/84 _
2.94- _
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
06/C5/84
5.32-
ED PHILLIPS
-
-- -
50- 3710 - 842 -84
- -
MANUAL
wi
135138
06/05/84
14.06-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
- "
06/05/84
"-
36.24-
-- -
ED FHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
-1
135138
06/05/84
7.62-
-ED PHILLIPS -
-- - -- - - - - "-
- - -50- 3710 - 862 -86 --
MANUAL I
13513E
C6/C5/84
4.67-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
135138
06105/84
4.72-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
135133
06105/84
3 *221.61
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
•t'
135138
06105/84
3 *121970
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
06/05/84
702.75
ED PHILLIPS_
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
`
135138
66/05/84
- "- .00
ED PHILLIPS
- " - -- - -- -
- " -50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
'i
135138
66/C5/84
1 *773.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
„i
135138
06/05/84
890.25
ED PHILLIPS
_ _ _
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
135138
C6/05/84
594.50
ED PHILLIPS
_
50 -4628- 822 -82
__-
MANUAL
•i'
135138
06/05/84
1?9.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
135138
C6/05/84
___827.20
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
:i
135138
06/05/84
1E4.65
ED PHILLIPS
- _
_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
•I
135138
06/05/84
14200
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL '.
'�
13513E
06/05/84
266.00 _- -
ED .PHILLIPS - _
- _
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
C6/C5/84
6.00-
ED PHILLIPS
_ _
50- 4628- 842 -84
_-
MANUAL
135138
06/C5/84
233.52
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
135138
06/05/84
-
-- -- 381.00 - -
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
135138
06/05/84
236.11
ED PHILLIPS
- -_ -- -- "
" "50- 4628 - 862 -86
_
MANUAL
135138
05/24184
37.93
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
135138
05/24/84
173.94
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY__.
50 -4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
135138
05/24/84
38.70
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY "
50 -4632- 862 -86
MANUAL
•
^I
12 *652.36 +
4y
----------------------
- - -
- -- - - +++ -CKS ..�
135190
06/05184
E1.03- _
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
135190
06/05/84
34.17-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
-
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
•
135190
06/05/84
30*60-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
135190
06/05/84
1 *708.65
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
�;'
135190
06105/84
1 *529.88
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
19 rTY CF EOIAA C FIE
-CHECK -NO.- DATE —AMOUNT VENDOR_
69164.16
EG IS TER
I-TEM DESCRIPTION
3 1
05-3 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT -NV.*- INV.
# P.O. 4 -MESSAGE
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
t
135271
06/05/84
64.06-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
06105/84
*41-
135271
06/05/84
28.28-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
8.83-
JOHNSON
135271
06/05/84
64.06-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
JOHNSON
WINE
135271
06f05f84
64.06-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
WINE
50-3710-842-84
135271
C6/C5/84
14.93-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PR
50-4628-822-82
135285
135271
06/05/84
79.11-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
MANUAL
06/G5/84
135271
061135/84
8.79-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
06/05/84
-3.12- .-,_.-,-._JOHNSON
83-
135271
06/05f84
37.33-
INTERCONTINENTAL
_PK__
3,52-
JOHNSON
135211
06/05/84
7*00-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
JOHNSCN
WINE
135271
06/05/84
108.94-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
WINE
WINE
1,
135271
06/05/84
.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4628-862-86
71
135271
06/05/84
18.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135285
06/05/94
135271
06/05/94
39955.F5
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
C6/C5124
9.60
135271
C6/G5f84____
---19866.82
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
•
c
135271
06/05/84
6*00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
JOHNSON
WINE
135271
06/05/84
59447.47
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
MINE
135271
06/05f84
24.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
1*
135285
135271
06/C5/84
.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135211
06/05/84
12.90
PK
135271
06/05f84
____INTERCONTINENTAL
746.68
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135271
06/05/84
000
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135271
06/05/84
439e78
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135271
06/05/84
3.90
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135271
06/05/84
.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
135271
06105/E4
5.10
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
`J'
135271
06105/84
350.15
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
•
21
12,400.09
3 1
05-3 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT -NV.*- INV.
# P.O. 4 -MESSAGE
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50 .-3710-842-.84__
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
135205
06105/84
*41-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3700-822-82
135285
06fO5/84
8.83-
JOHNSON
WINE
--.50-3700-862-86
135285
06/05/84
5*58-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-822-82
135285
06105/84
e48
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-842-84
135285
06/05/84
8.22-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628-822-82
135285
06/C5/84
11922-
JOHNSON
WINE
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
06/G5/84
50-4626- 82 2- 82
MANUAL
WINE-
50 4626-842-84____________
.135285
135285
06/05/84
-3.12- .-,_.-,-._JOHNSON
83-
JOHNSON
WINE
______ 50-4626-862-86
135285
06/05184
3,52-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628-822-82
135295
C6/C5/24
441*71
JOHNSCN
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
135285
135285
06/05/81
06/05/84
1*50
279*40
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
1,
135285
06105/84
o30
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628-862-86
135285
06/05/84
20.77
JOHNSON
WINE
50--4628-862-86
135285
06/05/94
6*90
JOHNSON
MINE
135285
C6/C5124
9.60
slOHRSCN
WINE
135285
06/05/84
3*60
JOHNSON
WINE
135285
06/05/84
561*49
JOHNSON
WINE
135285
06/05/84
* 60
JOHNSON
MINE
5
13528.
C 6 10 5 / 8 4
— 15 10
JOHNSON _
'.
WINE
1*
135285
06/05f84
41*54
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-822-82
05-3 PAGE 5
ACCOUNT -NV.*- INV.
# P.O. 4 -MESSAGE
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50 .-3710-842-.84__
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
**• -CKS
50-3700-822-82
MANUAL
50-3700-822-82
MANUAL
50 -3700- 842 -84
MANUAL
I0ld
--.50-3700-862-86
MANUAL.
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4626- 82 2- 82
MANUAL
50 4626-842-84____________
MANUAL
50:4626-842-84
MANUAL
______ 50-4626-862-86
MANUAL
71.
----------
MANUAL
I
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
d
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
_______5O-4628-862.-86
MANUAL
50--4628-862-86
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50 .-3710-842-.84__
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82_______
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50-46 28- 82 Z-8 2
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
71.
----------
- ---- --
d
I
v;•
u
rrrrrr
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
TWIN
CHECK REGISTER
WINE -
05 -31 -84 PAGE 6
06/05/84
3.67-
GUALITY
WINE
vi.
135451
C6/05/84
49014-
GUALITY
CHECK NC.
CATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
N P.O. 4 MESSAGE
WINE
135285
06/05/84
411.05
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
WINE
135285
06/05/84
24.32-
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
j
135285
06/05/84
3.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
66/05/84
135285
06/[5/84
176.30
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
507-
' 135285
06/05/84
3.00
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
I,
WINE
TWIN
2,051.29
--
2,457.11
GUALITY
WINE
06/05/84
135451
06/05/84
833.98
GUALITY
WINE
`
rrrrrr
815.75
GUALITY
WINE
-..
• r. -CKS
r„
135435
06/05/84
8.17-
PRICR WIDE CO
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
...
135435
06/05/84
5.64-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
GUALITY
135435
06/C5/84
4.10-
_
PRIOR WINE CO
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
WINE
135435
06/05/84
391.50
PRIOR WIN: CO
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
�
135435
05/24/84
17.18
FRIOR WIN= INVENTORY-
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
135435
06/75/84
282.00
_.. --
PRIOR WINE CO
- --
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- --
MANUAL
`,i..
135435
'
C6 /C5 /84
204.75
PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
877.52 r
v;•
u
rrrrrr
06/05/84
4.69-
TWIN
CITY
WINE -
135451
06/05/84
3.67-
GUALITY
WINE
vi.
135451
C6/05/84
49014-
GUALITY
WINE
C6/C5/84
135451
L6/C5/84
15.26-
GUALITY
WINE
135451
06/C5/84
16.67-
GUALITY
WINE
WINE
135451
06/05/84
5.33-
GUALITY
WINE
I
135451
06/C5/84
5.67-
GUALITY
WINE
06/05/84
135451
66/05/84
16.31-
GUALITY
WINE
_ y -
135451
C6/05/84
507-
GUALITY
WINE
-
135451
06/05/84
- -- -
3.30-
-
- GUALITY
WINE
TWIN
135451
06105/e4
2,457.11
GUALITY
WINE
06/05/84
135451
06/05/84
833.98
GUALITY
WINE
135451
06/05/84
815.75
GUALITY
WINE
-..
135451
C6/05/84
183-
83.70
GUALITY
WINE
135451
06/05/84
763.17
GUALITY
WINE
135451
06/05/84
293.92
GUALITY
WINE
135451
06/05/84
266.62
GUALTTY
WINE
135451
C6/C5/84
1E5.33
GUALITY
DINE
135451
06105/84
293.92
GUALITY-
{
_
- - -
5.952.08 •
,Y_INE --
ni"' '
rrrrr•
50-3710-822-82
50 -3 710- 82 2- 82
57- 3710 - 822 -82
- - 50 -3710- 842 -84 -
50 -3710- 842 -84
50- 3710- 842 -84
- _ -- 50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710- 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
- - -- - 50- 4626- 822 -82
50- 4626- 842 -84
50- 4626- 862 -86
-- - - -50- 4628- 822 -82
50- 4628- 822 -82
50 -4628- 842 -84
- - - -- - ----- - - -50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628- 862 -86
______. __ ______.___. 50 -4628- 862 -86_ -
yi 976.93
` rrrrrr- --- --- - ---- -- -- - -- - -- -
138055 05/24/84 46.87 - BRAEMAR GOLF_- __PETTY.CA_SH
r rr -C MS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL _
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
rr• -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
----- - - - - -- - _. •rr -CKS
___27- 41.20- .661 -66 MANUAL
L
135540
06/05/84
4.69-
TWIN
CITY
WINE -
50- 3710- 822 -82
I" 135540
06/05/94
6.08-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
q 135540
C6/C5/84
8.79-
-
TWIN
CITY
., _
WINE
_ _ _
50- 3710- 862 -86
13554C
06/05/84
234.84
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
^I 135540 -
06/05/84
- - - --
— 3.00
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
135540
06/05/84
-- 6.60 - --
TWIN
CITY
WINE - -- - - - --
- - ----- - - -50- 4628- 842 -84 -
r,�
=i 13554C
C6/C5/84
304.36
TWIN
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
135540
j4
06/C5/84
7.R0
TWIN
CITY.
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
135540
06/05/84
439.89
TWIN
CITY
WINE
_ _
50- 4628- 862 -86
yi 976.93
` rrrrrr- --- --- - ---- -- -- - -- - -- -
138055 05/24/84 46.87 - BRAEMAR GOLF_- __PETTY.CA_SH
r rr -C MS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL _
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
rr• -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
----- - - - - -- - _. •rr -CKS
___27- 41.20- .661 -66 MANUAL
L
1S
ITY
OF EOINA
CH. REGISTER
05 -2� 4 PAGE 7
CC Z!
CHECK NC.
138055
DATE
05/24/84
AMOUNT
230.37
VENDOR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION - ___ACCOUAT
NO. INV.
A P.O., 11 MESSAGE
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27- 4120- 663 -66
MANUAL
I'•
138055
05/24/84
142.87
BRAEMAR
GOLF --
PETTY
CASH
27-4120-664-66
MANUAL
136055
05/24/84
19.75
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27 -4120- 666 -66
- _ _ _.
MANUAL
138055
05/24/84
12.00
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27- 4200 - 661 -66
MANUAL
138055
05/24/84
28.95
BRAEMAR
GOLF _ _
PETTY_
CASH____
27- 4204 - 660 -66_
MANUAL
138055
05/24/84
29.00
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
_
27 -4206- 660 -66
__ _
MANUAL
E!I
°�
138055
05/24/84
20.00
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27- 4290 - 660 -66
MANUAL
138055
05/24/84
4.78 _ _
BRAEMAR
.GOLF _ _ _
PETTY
CASH
4502 - 660 -66
MANUAL
138055
05/24/P.4
46.29
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
-- _____-- __- - -_27-
CASH
27 -4504- 661 -66
..
MANUAL
G
'!
138055
05/24/P4
24.63
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASK'
27 -4512- 661 -66
MANUAL
-!
138055
05/24/84
_ _ 6.10
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27- 4516 - 660 -66
MANUAL
138055
05/24/84
12.70
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CASH
27- 4560- 662 -66
_
MANUAL
!'
138055
'05/24/84
8.48
BRAEMAR
GOLF
PETTY
CAS}
27 -4580- 663 -66
MANUAL
138055
05124/84
41.24
BRAEMAR-GOLF
_
PETTY
CASH
27- 4624- 664 -66
MANUAL
674.03 +
-- -
- - _-MANUAL
u
aaf +fa
+f+-M -
-
CI
='�
138430
05/24/84
199495.49
STATE PERA
EMP PERA
10 -4145- 510 -51
MANUAL
-'
19,495.49 +
zzi
_
ffrfff
_
•i +-C KS
138523
05/24/84
7788.71
SOCIAL SECURITY
EMP FICA
- - - -
10- 4149510 -51
- --
MANUAL
-
79788.71
I'
•f +ff f
+f -C KS
!=
139114
05/24/84
_909000.00 -_
_____1ST SOUTHDALE
BANK
TRANSFER
50- 1010- 000 -00
MANUAL
139174
05/24/84
909000.00
1ST SOUTHDALE
BANK
TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
_
MANUAL
I'!
.00 f
3
ff +fff
+•+ -CMS
-I'
143067
06/05/84
_ 600.77
CAPITAL
CITY DISTRI__
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL_
143067
06/05/84
10.35
CAPITAL
CITY DISTRI
_
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
143067
C6/C5/84
7.65
CAPITAL
CITY DISTRI
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
� •
143067
06/05/84__
_ _ 342.00 _ -
CAPITAL
CITY .DISTRI_ _
-
-,
50 -4628- 862 -86_
MANUAL
143067
05/24/84
85.40
CAPITAL
CITY
_
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
MANUAL
. .
!.
19046.17 •
i
CKS
143095
05124/84
- 87.26
CIMM OF
REVENUE
SALES
TAX
MANUAL
143095
05/24/84
18.00
COMM OF
REVENUE
TAX
___10-3357-000-00
10- 4204 = 200 -20
MANUAL
i
143095
05/24/84
82.10
COMM OF
REVENUE
SALES
TAX
23- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
143095 _
05124/84
49 8
- . 206.5 _
-
COMM OF
REVENUE _ -
SALES
TAX_
27- 3357 - 000 -00
MANUAL
°
143095
143095
05/24/84
C5124/84
206.94
32.26
COMM OF
R EVENUE
SALES
- _
TAM
28- 3357 - 000 -00 _ - --
-
MANUAL
L
COMM CF
REVENUE
SALES
TAX
29- 3357- OOC -00
MANUAL
143095
C5/24/84
_ 332.16
COMM OF
_ PEVENUE
SALES
TAX -_
30- 3357 - 000- 00_•-____
MANUAL
143095
05124184
69916.77
COMM OF
REVENUE
SALES
_ _
TAX
50- 3357- 001 -00
_
MANUAL
'
143095
C5/24/84
139554.60
COMM CF
REVENUE
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 002 -00
MANUAL
143095
- - - -
-- 05/24/84
- _ _ 129098.41 _
- CORM OF
REVENUE. - -- _
SALES
TAX
50- 3357 - 003 -00_
MANUAL___
379535.35 +
_ - -
-_
_E
S..
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -84 PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
0 P.O. 4 MESSAGE
143129
C6 /05/84
754.75
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
143129
C6/05/84
1,101.00
BELLBOY
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
143129
06/05/84
701.25
BELLBOY
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
2,557.00 •
• •• -CKS
143135
C6 /C5 /84
.06
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
`
143135
06/C5/84
4.83-
EACLF WIRE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
143135
06/C5/84
241.30
EAGLE WINE
MANUAL
i"
1431 35
06/05/84
3.20-
EAGL_ WINE
- -- -- - -
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
233.33 •
•••• ►•
••• -CKS
143138
06/05/84
41.96-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82_
MANUAL
143138
06/[5/84
6.20-
ED PHILLIPS
_
_ _
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
��-
143138
06/05/84
13947-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
4.30-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
143138
116/051 E4
11.68-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
C6 /C5 /E4
.08
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
-'
143138
- -
06/05/84
- -
7.93-
- - --
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 642 -84
MANUAL_
1431 38
06/05/84
.12
ED PHILLIPS
- - - -_
- -- 50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
49067-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
12.06-
ED PHILLIPS
.
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
14313E
06/05/84
52.10-
ED PHILLIPS
_ _
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
.23
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
143138
C6/05/E4
- - .23-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
1431 38
06/05/84
.23
ED PHILLIPS
- -- - -- - - - -- - - --
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
143138
C6105/84
2,098.11
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
143138
C6/05/84
2,483.30
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
06105/84
5.77-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
�,...
143138
06/05/84
2,605.10
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
14313E
06105184
309.75
-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
,
143138
06105/E4
673.50
ED PHILLIPS
- ------ -
- - -50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
215.00
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
391.48
ED PHILLIPS
__- -._.. _.__.._
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
C6/05/84
2.92-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
_
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
4.22-
ED FHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
^'I
1431381
06105/84
_ 584.00
-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
11.37
ED PHILLIPS
_ _ _
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
w
143138
06/05/84
11.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
143138
06/05/84
602.90
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
!I
143138
06/05/84
11.37-
ED PHILLIPS
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
99740.02
- - - -
-- - -- - - -- -- -
- - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- -
-- - -- - -- _---- - - - -
-- - -- - - --
CKS
,
I!i
143190
06/05/84
70.40-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C _
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
,1
143190
06/05/84
34.29-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
`i
143190
06105/84
49.02-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
f
`=
143190
06/05/84
__
_ _ 39520.13___----.-GRIGGS.-
_GRIGGS_COOPER
COOPER
AND _C_
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
143190
06/05/84
1,714.26
GRIGGS COOPER
_
AND C
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
143190
06/05/84
2,450.78
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
11
�
ITY CF EDINA
CHL .4EGISTER
05-3 • PAGE 9
CHECK NO.- DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NOo INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
;(79531.46
143198
05124184
71
59505*06 GROUP HEALTH EMP HOSP
59505.06
1
143271
06/05/84
50,06-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-3710-822-82
143271
06/0/84
6.59—
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -84
143271
06J05/84
32.49-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-3710-862-86
143271
06/05/84
38.88-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626-822-82
143271
06/05f84
5*02—
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626-842-84
143271
06/C5/84
9*45-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626862-86
143271
06/05/84
51.13—
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4628-822-82
143271
06/05f84
29503.21
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
13985—
143271
C6/C5/84
6.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
143271
06/05/84
19624.59
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-3710-862-86
143271
06/05184
5.40
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
4.27---
143271
06/0/84
5.70
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
143271
06/05/84
19944.49
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626-822-82
143271
06/05/8;
29556985
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
3*90
143271
06/05/84
10 20--_
_INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
•
143271
06/05/84
:30
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626-842-84
143271
06105/84
251902
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
19048.45
143271
06f05/84
329.58
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
143271
06/05/84
5o40
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50-4626-862-86
143271
06105/84
6*60
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
3*00
3.30
143271
06105f84
472.95
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
143285
06/05/84
9,528:67
JOHNSON
_WINE-- __.._-
____- ____.__50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
MANUAL
143285
06/05/84
**—CKS
MANUAL
06/05f84
14,70-
JOHNSON
***—CI(S
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
_____
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
50-4626— 82 2- 82
MANUAL
50-4626-842-84
MANUAL
50-4626-842-84
MANUAL
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
------
50 -4626- 862 -86 —
MANUAL
50-4626862-86
MANUAL
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
MANUAL
___50_-4628-862-86___
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
13985—
• **—CKS
143285
06/05f84
14,70-
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 3700- 862 -86
MANUAL
143285
06fC5/84
4.44—
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
143285
06/C5/84
14.22—
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
143285
06f05/84
20.96-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-842-84
MANUAL
143285
06/05/84
21.81—
JOHNSON
WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
PANUAL
143285
06/05/84
13985—
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
143285
___ 06/05/84
- 6.32-
JOHNSON
-JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
143285
06/05f84
4.27---
WINE
50-3710-862-86
MANUAL
143225
C6/C5/84
711*20
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
143285
06f05/84
3*90
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
143285
06105/84
4.50
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4626-842-84
MANUAL
143205
06/05f84
19048.45
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
PANUAL
143285
06/05/84
692.95
0HNSON
WINE
50-4626-862-86
MANUAL
143285
143285
06/05/84
06/05/84
3*00
3.30
JOHNSON
JOHNSON
WINE
WINE
50 -4626- 862 -86
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
143285
06/05/84
222*36
JOHNSON
_WINE-- __.._-
____- ____.__50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
MANUAL
143285
06/05/84
16o20
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
143285
06f05/84
19090.60
JOHNSON
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
143285
C6/C5/84
3_16.44_____
JOHNSON --wrhE------------------50-4628-862--86--------.--
MANUAL---
143265
06/05/84
4s50
JOHNSON
WINE
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
143285
06f05/84
2*40
JOHNSON
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
i .i
1984 CITY OF EOINA
CHECK NO. DATE
143285 06/05/84
143285 06/05/84
CHECK REGISTER
AMOUNT VENDOR
213.82 JOHNSON WINE
.00 JOHNSON WINE
4,232.05
05 -31 -84 PAGE 10
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV* 0 P.O. # MESSAGE
50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
143415 06/01184 99898.00 MED.CENTER.
9,898.00 +
v ..
` 143433 05/24/84 109.80 FAUTIS b SONS
I•:,, - - 109.80
*rf *ff
143435 05/24/84 42.42 PRIOR WINE
`.I 42.42 +
r -
EMPL HOSP CONT _,__ .. _- 10- 4156 - 510 -51
* +* -CKS
MANUAL
-- - - -- - -- - * ** -CKS
INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL
+ ** -CKS
INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL
*rfrf
f ** -CKS
143354
05/24/84
427.15
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 446 -44
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
698.45
NiNNEG'ASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 520 -52
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
1,485.88
MINNEG'ASCO
HEAT
10- 4254- 540 -54
MANUAL
�i
143354
05/24/84
89.49
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 611 -61
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
1,334.50
MINNEG'ASCO
HEAT _ -
- 20- 1130 - 000 -CO
MANUAL
143354
05/24184
695.54
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
20- 4254- 646 -64
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
19125.65
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
26- 4254- 689 -68
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
70.20
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
27- 4254- 662 -66
MANUAL.
j
143354
05/24/84
4,169.04
MINNEGASC0
HEAT
28- 4254- 708 -70
MANUAL
Vi
143354
05/24/84
19396.28
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
30- 4254- 781 -78
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
124.51
MINNEGASCG
HEAT
40- 4254 - 801 -80
MANUAL
143354
05/24/84
52 *04
MINNEGASCO
_
HEAT
_
50- 4254 - 821 -82
MANUAL
`i
143354
05/24/84
27.64
RINNEGASCO
HEAT
50- 4254- 821 -82
MANUAL
j.•,
143354
05/24/_84
155.89
MINNEGASCO
HEAT - -
50 -4254- 861 -86
MANUAL
11 9852.26 *
-- -- - --
- -- - - - -- -
i
* * *fff
`I-
143396
05/24/84
60.25
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
10- 4226- 160 -16
MANUAL ;
�-
143396
05/24/84
49388.42
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
10- 4256 - 510 -51
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
291.44
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
_
20 -4256- 622 -62
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
116.22
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
20- 4256- 628 -62
MANUAL ,
143396
05/24/84
126.43
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
20- 4256- 646 -64
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
146.00
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
23- 4256 - 611 -61
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
59.01
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
26- 4256- 689 -68
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
367.95
KW BELL
TELEPHONE
27- 4256- 661 -66
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
320.73
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
28 -4256- 708 -70
MANUAL
143396
05124/84
47.77
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
29- 4256- 721 -72
MANUAL ,
143396
05/24/84
166.30
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
30- 4256- 782 -78
MANUAL
143396
05/24/84
185.65
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
40- 4256- 801 -80
MANUAL
`,I
143396
05/24/84
154.05
NW BELL
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 821 -82
MANUAL
•,.;
143396
143396
05/24/84
05/24/84
163.59
114.18
NW BELL _ _ _ _
NW BELL
-TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
50- 4256- 841 -84
50- 4256 - 861 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
vj
69707.99 +
143415 06/01184 99898.00 MED.CENTER.
9,898.00 +
v ..
` 143433 05/24/84 109.80 FAUTIS b SONS
I•:,, - - 109.80
*rf *ff
143435 05/24/84 42.42 PRIOR WINE
`.I 42.42 +
r -
EMPL HOSP CONT _,__ .. _- 10- 4156 - 510 -51
* +* -CKS
MANUAL
-- - - -- - -- - * ** -CKS
INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL
+ ** -CKS
INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL
!�
1"9, LTY
OF EDINA
CHE EGISTER
05 -3,
PAGE 11
CHECK NC.
- -DATE -
_._ AMOUNT
VENDOR_ _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT -_N0a_ INV*_ 8 P.0_. _
-p MESSAGE
=!
rr #aft
rra -CKS
ul.
143442
05/24/84
99598.04
PF'P•
EMP HCSP
10 -4156- 510 -51
MANUAL
99598•.04
- --
_. - -
- --
-
^i
rarrrf
r +r -CKS
r
143451
C6/C5/84
9.24-
GUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
143451
06/05/84
19.75-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
j
143451
06/05/84
-
7.59-
- - - -
QUALITY WINE - - - - --
- - - - - -- - - - --
50- 3710 - 822 -82
-
MANUAL. -
143451
06/C5/84
5.20-
GUALITY WINE
50-3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
"
143451
06/C5/84
.27
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
143451
06/05/94
.05
QUALITY WINE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
^^
143451
G6/C5/84
_
31.09-
_
GUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
!t
7
143451
06/[5184
20.37-
GUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
j
143451
06/05/84
.13
GUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
143451
06/05/84 -
- - -- 23.01-
_ GUALITY WINE - - - -- --
- --
- -50 -3710- 862 -86 - - -.- -
_MANUAL
MANUAL
ti
143451
06/05/84
2.58-
GUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
'
143451
06/05/84
987.80
GUALITY WINE, _ -_ _ _ -. _ -_
-_- -_
_50- 4628- 822 -82 _ ,.
MANUAL .
-;
143451
06/C5/84
462900
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
143451
06/05/84
379.77
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
'
'•
143451
06/C5/84
_ 260.00
_ QUALITY _WINE _ —
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
143451
06005/84
13.33-
—
GUALITY WINE
_ - - -_
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
�yI`•;
143451
06/C5/84
1,554.95
QUALITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
I27_
143451
06/05/84
6.41-
GUALITY WINE _ _ --
_V_ -- __---- '---- _
--_ -- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- --
- MANUAL
'j
143451
06/C5/84
1,150.74
GUALITf WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
143451
06/05/84
1,018.75
QUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
59675.79 +
'Vi•�
ff#afr
ra: -CKS
-
'
143522
05/24184
17,558.24
AMOCO OIL
GASOLJINE
10- 4612 - 560 -56
MANUAL
'
179558.24 +
`
-- -
rrr -CKS
I';
143540
06105/84
5.32-
TWIN -CITY -WINE --
50 -3710- 822 -82 _ -
MANUAL
.;
of
143540
06/05/84
8.26-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
c
143540
06/05/84
5.70-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
f
143540
06/C5/84
5.70
TWIN CITY VINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
143540
C6105/84 -
- - 266.09 --
- TWIN CITY WINE - _
- __ - -- —
- -- SO -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
�•
143540
06/05/84
413938
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
t
143540 .__.-
06/05/84
9.00 _
TWIN CITY _WINE
_ -,
50- 4628 - 842 -84 _..
MANUAL _
143540
06105/84
5.40
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
143540
06/[5/84
285.36
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
i
965.65 +
arr -CKS
143700
L5/24/84
29000.00
US POSTMASTER
POSTAGE DUE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
MANUAL
29000.00 •
:'_ e
143701
05/24/84
265.88
MN OEPII OF REVENUE
GASOLINE
10- 4612 - 560 -56
MANUAL
!"
�;:
265.88
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -84 PAGE 12
r.
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIP7ION _
ACCOUNT _N0. INV.A
P.O. A MESSAGE
143702.
05/24/84
19795.50
UHL CO _
CONT.REPAIRS -_ -
4248- 520 -52
MANUAL
19795.50 •
_10-
I
143703
05/24184 -
- 249597.00
A_V_IS
C_ARS
10- 4908 - 420 -42
MANUAL
249597.00 .
- - --
- -
*a• -CKS
150067
06/05/84
2.01-
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150067
06/05/84
108.50
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150067
06/C5/84
108.50
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150067
06/G5/84
184.G0
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
5C- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150067
06/05/84
5.50
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
j
150067
06/C5/84
2.20
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
_
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL "
�i
150067
06JC5/R4
2.20
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150067
06/05/84
108.50-
- CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150067
06/05/84
2.20-
CAPITAL CITY
- --
DISTRI
50- 4628- 822 -82
_
MANUAL
150067
C6/05/84
1.10
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
150067
06/C5/84
?5.50
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
150067
06/C1/84
99.60
CAPITAL CITY
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
,i
150067
06/01/84
32.85
CAPITAL CITY
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
i
467.25
�j
.r••ra
*** -CKS
150129
06/05/84
29418.80
BELLBOY
50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
150129
06/05/84
357.90
EELLBCY
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
I.'
150129
06/05/84
79450.68
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
I
150129
06/05/84
49998.38
BELLBOY -
- - - - - - -- -
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
159225.76
ar•aar
_-
-
••• —CKS
150135
06/05/94
8.00- _
EAGLE WINE __
50- 3700 - 822 -82
MANUAL
150135
06105/84
32.00-
EAGLE WINE
_ _
_ _
50- 3700- 862 -86
_
PANUAL
150135
06105/84
14.75-
EAGL= WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
150135
06/05/84
38090-
EAGLE WINE_-
_ -- - - _ - -_ -_
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
I.i
150135
06/05/84
4.00-
EAGLE WINE
-- -- - - - - --
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150135
C6/C5/84
11.01-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
150135
06/05/84
6.02-
EAGLE_WINE -
- -
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL ,
150135
06/05/84
-00
EAGLE WINE
- -- - --
- -50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
�.I
150135
C6/C5/84
376.80
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
1501 35
06/05/84
737.70
EAGLE WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
>I
150135
06/05/84
550.35
EAGLE WINE
_ _
50- 4628- 842 -84
_ _
MANUAL
�I
150135
06/05184
200.00
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150135
06/C5/84
.00_
EAGLE WINE _
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150135
06/05/84
300.80
EAGLE WINE
_
50- 4628- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
r
'=
150135
06/G1/84
91.19
EAGLE WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
29142.16
.
* ** -CKS '
-
--
150138
06101184
- - - -
.68-
- --
ED PHILLIPS - -
- - -- - -- -
-- CORRECTION --
-
-'- 5D- - - 3710 - 003 -00 --
- -- ;
MANUAL
150138
06/01/84
.68-
ED PHILLIPS
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
l
MANUAL
r
191 ITY
OF EOIAA
CHE
EGISTER
05 -3,
PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
DATE _
— AMOUNT
VENDOR _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
N0. INV.A P.O.
4 MESSAGE
150138
06/01/84
.68
ED PHILLIPS
DISCOUNT
50 -3710- 003 -00
MANUAL
"1
150138
06/05/84
5.30-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822- 82.
MANUAL
a R
II
150138
06/G5/84
5.76-
ED FHILLIPS
_
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
c --
150138
06/05/84
71.48-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
150138
-
C610/84
- - _ 22.98-
- ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
i, e
'I
150138
06/05/84
115.65-
ED PHILLIPS
-- - - - -_ -
- -- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - -
-- MANUAL
150138
06/05/84
5.80-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
:.f
^!
_
150138
06/05/84
23.16-
ED PHILLIPS -,_
- _----- _------ ----
_..50- 3710842 -84_ -
MANUAL
150138
06/05/84
32.05-
ED PHILLIPS
-- -_- _-
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
-
-
150138
06/G5/84
45.37-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
i
150138
06/05/84 --
15.10-
- -- -- - —
— - ED PHILLIPS --
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150138
06/05/64
. 12
ED PHTLLIPS
- -- - _ -- - - -—
50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- -
-- MANUAL
150139
06105/84
3.80-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
;s
150138
06/05/84 _
5.07 -___
E7 PHILLIPS
_ _ _ _
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL :.
'n,
"-
150138
06 /C5 /84
3,573.95
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4626- 822 -82
_
MANUAL
150138
06/05/84
5,782.71
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
e
"I
150138
06/05/84
—_
- -- -- 29268.25 -
ED PHILLIPS -
- -ED
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
150138
06/05/84
265.00
- -
PHILLIPS
-- -- — _- — - - --
50- 4628- 822 -82 -- -
- MANUAL
_I
�!7i,
150138
06/05/84
2f7.75
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150138
C6/0/84
19148.84
ED. - FHILLIPS _ _
_ _ _ —
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
-j
150138
06/05/84
290.07
ED PHILLIPS
_
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
`y! ^•I
150138
C6/05/84
19602.41
°_D PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
="
150138
06/05/84
-
.1 9157.75
-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150138
-
G6/05/84
- -- - - 6.10- -
-- ED PHILLIPS - --
— —_ - - --
- -- 50- 4628 - 862 -86—
_
MANUAL
150138
06/05/84
189.80
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150138
06/C5/84
253.40
ED PHILLIPS
_ _
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
:.i
150138
06/05/84
754.75
ED PHILLIPS
-
50- 4628- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
150138
06/01/84
3302
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
150138
06/01/84
33.12
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
. 150138
06/01/84
33.80
_
ED PHILLIPS'
_
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
MANUAL
"
3.;
Ij
179316.54 r
C
'
urrr•
***-COS
150190
06/05/84
53.91-
GRIGGS COOPER AND
C
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
150190
06105/84
73.55-
GRIGGS COOPER AND
_
C
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150190
06/G5/84
54.28-
GRIGGS COOPER AAD
C
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
C
15019
06/05/84
29655.56
_ GRIGGS COOPER -.A NO
C __...__..__
_50- 4626 - 822 -82
MANUAL
- ;
'
150190
06/05/84
3,677.26
GRIGGS COOPER AND
C
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
"i
150190
06/05/84
29713.80
GRIGGS COOPER AND
C
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
t
•.0
'
_ 8,904.88 •
1+. •.i
999999
**&-CKS
i
150271
06/05/84
28.62-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3700- 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/01184
5.71-
INTER PKG
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
MANUAL
i
150271_
06/05/84 _
_ 12.02-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK _
50- 3710- 822 -82__
MANUAL
!
�•
150271
06/05/84
12.02-
INTERCONTINENTAL
__
PK
—
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
_
150271
06/05/84
53.93-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
�,{(
!
150271
06105/84
_ __. 0.13- _
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK ,._. , _....__
50- 3710 - 822 -82_ _
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
12.02
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
133.46-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
I^'
150271
06/05/84_
.08
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 842 -86
MANUAL____
-'
. 150271
06/05/84
-------18.66-. _
__ INTERCONTINENTAL
__ _
PK
_
50- 3710- 842 -84
_
MANUAL
150271
06/05/E4
68.02-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
F
`
�
\�
i
1984 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
C5 -31 -84 PAGE 14
l
CHECK NO.
DATE
- AMOUNT
VENDOR
_IT_EM_DESCRIPTION_ _- ,_____-
ACCOUNT N0. INV.q
P.O. 4 MESSAGE
('
150271
06/05/84
6.18-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
5.06-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
13.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
29696.79
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
.75
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
MANUAL
150271
06/C5/e4
456.65
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_ ______________50-4626-822-82
50- 4626 - 622 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
69673.13
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
31.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
I
150271
06/05/84
4.27-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
309.18
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
17.10
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/C5/e4
39401.27
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
_
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�.�
150271
06/05/84
060
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
150271
06/05/64
7.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
C6/C5/84
601.33
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
�j
150271
06/05/84
601.38
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
7.80
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
601.33-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
`
150271
06/C5/e4
7080-
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
�•
150271
06/05/84
933.36
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150271
06/05/84
9.60
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150271
06/C5/84
253.28
IN'TERCONTTNENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-.
150271
06/05/84
.00
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
!
150271
06/05/84
4.20
INTERCONTINENTAL
PK
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
v�-
150271
06/01/84
279.89
INTER PKG
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
MANUAL
150271
06101/84_
_ 279.89
INTER PKG
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
MANUAL
150271
06101/84
285.60
INTER PKG
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 862 -86
MANUAL
159909.89
I,,.
•.••..
-
... -CKS
150285
06/05/84
3.71-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
.08
JOHNSON WINE
_
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
�!
150285
06/05/84
21.85-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/C5/84
26.99-
-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
j150285
06/C5/84
14.22-
JOHNSON WINE -
- - -- - - --
- - 50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
C6105/84
3.21-
JOHNSCN WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
150295
06/05184
711.20
WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
3.00
___JOHNSON
JOHNSON WINE
-
- _
_ _
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/G5/84
1080
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
185.57
JOHNSON WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150285
06105/84
21.90
_
JOHNSON WINE
_
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/C5/e4
9.60
JOMNSCN WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
19092.75
JOHNSON WINE_ -
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
19349.60
JOHNSON WINE
_
-
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/C5/84
4.25-
JOHNSON WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84 _
160.89
- ___
JOHNSON WINE
- - -
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150285
06/05/84
2.40
--
JOHNSON WINE
-- - -
- - - -- -
- --
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
39464.56 •
�I• 150451 _ 06/05/84 _ _ _ 11.51-
-,If 150451 06/C5/84 49.19 -
S7 � 150451 06/05/84 .37
QUALITY WINE___
GUALITY WINE
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 822 -82
-- - -50- 3710 - 822 -82 - -- -- -
50 -3710- 842 -84
. a. -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
I"� ifffff
150766 06101/84 52.25 STATE MN LIC PLATES
52.25 +
frriff
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
152702
L6/01/84
10.04
49 ITY
OF EDINA
06/01/84
CHI EGISTER
05 -3
PAGE 15
06/01/84
85.82
AT
152702
06/El/84 -
- - 63.05
'AT
152702
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUAT
VENOCR _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0._TNV_._8_P*0.
A MESSAGE
"
152702
150451
06/05/84
51.63-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL ,
AT
152702
150451
06/05/84
.44
GUALITY WINE --- --- _.-
3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
11 SC
152702
150451
06/C5/84
1.76
- ____..
GUALITY WINE
___50- __ - __ __ _ -_
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
*36
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
22.20-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
_
12.45-
QUALITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL '
150451
06/C5/84
42.49-
GUALITY WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
I^
150451
06105/B4
2,459.58 _
OUALITY WINE - -_ _
50- 4626- 822- 82.__ -._
MANUAL
150451
C6 /C5 /84
29581.92
GUALITY WINE
-_._ __
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
18.68-
GUALITY WINE
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
29124*76 _
GUALITY WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
575.89
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
1.110.44
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150451
06/05/84
87.95-
QUALITY WINE
4628- 842- 84______
150451
06/05/84
18.06-
_-
QUALITY WINE
__50- ____
50- 4628- 842 -84
_ _- ,MANUAL
MANUAL
150451
06105/84
21.95-
GUALITY WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
I"
150451
06/05/84
622.60
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-.--
99142.01 •
- _GUALITY_WINE __ _ _ _ _
-- - -
**f -CKS
150540
06/05/84
6.15-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
i
150540
06/05/8')
27.82-
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710- 842 -84_
MANUAL
150540
06/05/84
14.33-
_ _ _ _
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
150540
06105/84
3.90
TWIN CITY WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
(=
150540
06105/84
307.55
TWIN CITY .WINE ------
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
150540
06/05/84
20.40
TWIN CITY WINE
_ _
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
y-
150540
06105/84
1,391.10
TWIN CITY WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
150540
i 150540 -
06105/84
06/05/84 -
716.59
- -- - 12.90 - -
TWIN CITY WINE
-- TWIN CITY WINE - - - - -- -- -
50- 4628- 862 -86
- -50 -4628- 862 -86 - -
MANUAL_
MANUAL
29404.14
--- ----- ---- ---- ----- - -
- - - -- -- - --- - - - - --
* ** -CKS
150759
06/01/84
369.00
BISHOP TRAVEL CONF & SCHOOLS
20- 4202 - 600 -60
MANUAL
369.00 *
- - - -- -
- -
I"� ifffff
150766 06101/84 52.25 STATE MN LIC PLATES
52.25 +
AT
frriff
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
152702
L6/01/84
10.04
1
GI
152702
06/01/84
20.80
.I
152702
06/01/84
85.82
AT
152702
06/El/84 -
- - 63.05
'AT
152702
06/01/84
41.73
AT
152702
06/01/84
4.50 -.
4. - -- -4.50
"
152702
06/01/84
TELEPHONE
�!
152702
06/01/84
4.50
AT
152702
C6 /C1 /84
87.09
�,- -
- - 152702 -T
-- 06/01/84 -T
-- 9000
11 SC
152702
06/01/84
14618
AT
S T
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
& T
TELEPHONE
AT
6 T_INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
& T
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
& T
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
'AT
& T.-
INFORMATICNCCRRECTTCN__,__
„____
AT
& T
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
AT
& T
INFORMATION
TELEPHONE
INFORMATION
AT
8 T
_
INFORMATION
_TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
-- AT
6 T
INFORMATION -�
TELEPHONE - -�
_ - * ** -CKS
10 -4908- 422 -42 MANUAL
* ** -CKS
- 10 -4256- 510 -51 - 20-4256-628-62
20- 4256- 628 -62
20- 4256- 661 -66
23- 4256- 611 -61
26 -4256- 689 -68
26- 4256- 689 -68
26- 4256 - 689 -68
28- 4256 - 708 -70
50 -4256-821 - -82 -- - - - - --
50 -4256- 841 -84
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
__. MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL _
MANUAL
MANUAL 177 .
u ,
1984 CITY
OF EDIAA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -31 -84 PAGE 16
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
__VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION__ __
ACCOUNT N0. INV. p P.O. -p MESSAGE_
i
336.21 •
• •• -CKS
153174
06/01/84
901,000.00-
1ST BANK
SOUTHDALE_
BANK__ TRANSFER
50- 1010- 000 -00_ MANUAL
153174
06/01/84
_
90,000.00
1ST BANK
SOUTHDALE
BANK TRANSFER
_ _
50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL
`
.00 •
...•.•
• *• -CKS
X156701
06/01/84
845.00
-
PAUL KINGBAY
-
REFUND ON FEE
10- 3150- 000 -00 MANUAL
845.00 •
••••••
••• -CKS
1069664.11
FUND 10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
_!
39102.80
FUND 20
TCTAL
PARK FUND
249.,0.3
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
19149.16
FUND 26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
_
5,319.03
FUND 27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
49783.80
FUND 28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER F_ UND
Hand typed checks pi's 56514 thru
80.03
FUND 29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
_
15705
_
1,894.74
FUND 30
TOTAL
WATERWORK FUND
�
310.16
FUND 40
TOTAL
SEWER RENTAL FUND
257347.09
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
380x960.75
!
__TOTAL
,- _
- -.. - _ -__ -- _ -
_ - -- -- - -- - - APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
+j
- _ _ _ _
- - - -__
CHECK REGISTER DATED •� � iK - •
L-
- - - - - - - -- — - - - - --
- - - - - - -- - -PAGES
1
- -
- - -
- - -- -- --
. _ - - - -
- -
/4;
- - - --
-- - - - -- -- - --- -- ------ ----------
--- -- - - -- -THROUGH
CITY MANAGE DATE
s+
- --
I CE (RECTOR DATE
s,
cl