Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-07-02_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JULY 2, 1984 7:00 P.M. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ROLLCALL MINUTES of June 4, 1984, and Joint Meeting with Council of June 18, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of June 18, 1984, and the Special Meeting of June 18, 1984, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager and Engineer. Public comment heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. P -L -26 (Continue to 8/6/84) Ashcroft Lane and West 6�rd Street B. Cascade Lane Berming (Continue to 8/6/84) II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Flood Plain Permits, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. * * * III. �c A. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Miller Addition - Generally located west of Dearborn Street and north . of Belmore Avenue (Contd from 6/4/84) 2. Blake Woods - Generally located east of Dearborn Street and north of Belmore Lane B. Lot Division 1. Lot 1, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition - 5940 Arbour Avenue C. Set Hearing Dates 1. Preliminary Plat Approval (7/16/84) a. Valley View 2nd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue b. Replat of Lot 70, Morningside - Located at 4231 Grimes Avenue So. c. Replat of Lot 1, Block 1, Taft Addition - Generally located south of Blake Road and north of Scriver Road 2. Final Site Plan Approval - Professional Plaza - 5108 Edina Ind.° °Blvd. (7/16/84) 3. Street Vacation - Dearborn Street, Spruce Road and Alley - Blake Woods .._...._ Plat (8/6/84) SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Hansen Road Residents B. Gershin.- Noise Ordinance_ IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. (1) Four Wheel Drive Articulated Loader V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS *• A. Public Health Nursing Services Contract for -1985 * B. Acceptance of Easement for Mirror Lake * C. LMC Legislative Study Committees for 1984 -85 Session * D. Authorization - Bids for South Ramp Repair - 50th & France Av. E. Concerns of Mayor and Council F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items VI. COMMUNICATIONS * A. Christ Presbyterian Church Agenda Edina City Council July 2, 1984 Page Two VII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass. * A. No Parking Resolution - France Avenue /494 - County Project VIII. FINANCE A. Liquor Fund Reports as of 4/30/84 and 5/31/84 B. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 7/2/84: General Fund $66,700.14, Park Fund $12,960.95, Art Center $2,400.71, Swimming Pool Fund $4,207.32, Golf Course Fund $18,362.85, Recreation Center Fund $2,088.02, Gun Range Fund $56.10, Waterwork Fund $8,148.07, Sewer Rental Fund $4,891.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $1,366.50, Construction Fund $1,205.50, Total $122,387.77. # .. :lk EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OF JOINT MEETING June 18, 1984 In attendance were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. H.R.A. /COUNCIL JOINT MEETING CONVENED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Attorney Erickson advised that State Statute requires that a public hearing be conducted concurrently by the Housing Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) and the Council on the Grandview Area Redevelop- ment Plan and Redevelopment Project. Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen to convene a joint.meeting of the H.R.A. and the Council to hear the Grand- view Area Redevelopment Plan and Project. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Affidavit of Publication in the Edina Sun on May 30, 1984, was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the proposed Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, advising that together the Plan and Project serve as the basis for the establishment of a tax increment financing project for the Grandview Area. The area is generally bounded by T.H. 100 on the easterly side, Vernon Avenue on the northerly and westerly sides, and Edenmoor Avenue on the southerly side. The Redevelopment Plan and Project were considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its May 30, 1984, meeting and the Commission recommended adoption by the H.R.A. and the Council. Mr. Larsen advised that in order to meet the statutory requirements.for the establishment of a tax increment district two documents are needed. First, the Redevelopment Plan which describes existing conditions, documents problems in the area, and recommends certain activities to correct problems and achieve goals and objectives established for the area. Second, the Redevelopment Project which serves as the finance plan for redevelopment activities. It estimates the public cost of the project, the method cf financing the cost, and the tax increment expected to repay the tax increment bonds. Mr. Larsen pointed out that Section II of the Plan describes existing problems in the Plan Area including a substantial quantity of substandard build- ings, non - conforming buildings and land uses, obsolete uses, and under utilized properties. The arrangement of public parking and the inadequate amount of park- ing in the commercial core of the area are also identified. In addition, traffic and circulation problems set forth in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ", prepared by BRW, Inc., are incorporated into the Plan. Based upon these problems, the Plan concludes that certain redevelopment activities are warranted. Among the goals and objectives set forth in the Plan are: 1) To promote development and redevelopment in a manner consistent with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, 2) To improve the efficiency of the street system through implement of the road improve- ments recommended in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ", 3) To promote and secure additional public parking in the area, and 4) To promote and secure the develop- ment of parcels with substandard and non - conforming buildings to more clearly define land uses and provide a more efficient utilization. The Plan also emphasizes improving the aesthetics and definition of the area through increased buffering, especially landscaping. Mr. Larsen advised that the Redevelopment Project No. 1 anticipates a total public redevelopment cost of approximately $4,500,000. This cost will be paid by the issuance of General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds and through special assessments against benefitting properties. The bonds would be amortized over 25 years. Public costs include the roadway improvements to Vernon Avenue and the construction of a 400 - stall, four level parking ramp on the site now housing storage facilities for the City. Expected private redevelopment includes redevelop- ment of the Biltmore 'Motel site with condominiums, increased retail and office space near Jerry's complex, redevelopment of three single family houses with eight town- J H.R.A. Minutes of 6/18/84 Page Two house units, and redevelopment of the area containing the Biltmore Bowl, Jerry Leonards and a small office building with additional office space. A later redevelt,r- ment would involve the railroad property and the industrial area south of Eden Avenue. Mr. Larsen explained that the Plan is proposed to be undertaken in two or more phases. Phase I of the project would involve the following public costs: 1) Demo- lition of existing City storage buildings and construction of a two level parking ramp (approximately 200 spaces) with the ground floor reserved for City storage, 2) Road improvements referred to as Issue Area 1 in the Traffic Study, i.e. the Sherwood, Eden, Vernon intersection and Link Road, and 3) Construction of a major new intersection serving Jerrys, First Bank and Union 76, including access to the parking ramp. The total public cost of the Phase I project would be $2,556,000. It is proposed that 20% of the cost be specially assessed, leaving $2,150,000 for which bonds would be sold. The bond issue would be amoritized over a period of 25 years with the tax increment provided by redevelopment and a general inflation increment on the 51 parcels in the District. The Council and staff then discussed the involvement of- private redevelopment in the area, the amortization period, the inflation factor, hearings on improvement projects to be assessed to property owners in the district, funding for the City's storage facility and why the Plan and Project are proposed at this time. No objections being heard, Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN; APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO, THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. It has been proposed that the HRA approve a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, to be designated as the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment'Plan "), and a redevelop- ment-project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 13, to be designated as Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelop- ment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Project, it has been further proposed that the HRA approve a tax increment financ- ing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan ") which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment Fi- nancing District (the "District "). 2. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District are described in the attached documents entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" and "Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 to be Undertaken Pursuant to the Grand- view Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota," and the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District as so described are hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the im- plementation of the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District. J t H.R.A. Minutes of 6/18/84 Page Three 3. The Redevelopment Plan and the Project were transmitted to the Community De- velopment and Planning Commission (the "Commission ") for its review and opinion. The Commission reviewed the Redevelopment Plan and Project on May 30, 1984, and adopted a resolution recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and Pro- ject. 4. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District, together with the written opinion of the Commission, shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan and the Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minne- sota Statutes, Section 273.74, and subdivision 3. Attest: Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Richards then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT .THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. This Council has received the written opinion of the City Planning Commis- sion as to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Project) and Grandview Tax Incre- ment Financing Plan (the Tax Increment Financing Plan) for Grandview Tax Incre- ment District (the District), and on June 18, 1984, held a public hearing on the same after notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on the 30th day of May, 1984. All persons desiring to be heard were heard. 2. This Council finds that the Project is a redevelopment project within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 13. The Project will contribute to the public health, safety and welfare. 3. This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10, as seventy percent (70 %) of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utili- ties or other improvements and at least twenty percent (20 %) of the buildings in the District contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities,. light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of internal parti- tions or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and at least an additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings in the District require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for inprovement or conversion. H.R.A. Minutes of 6/18/84 Page Four 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it.is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the Project area would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The Redevelopment Plan for the redevelopment area within the City in- cluded therein will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise; and (C) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: (A) The District is a redevelopment district as defined in Minnesota Stat- utes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10. (B) The proposed development in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the devel- opment of the City as a whole. (D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private enterprise. (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minne- sota Statutes, Section 273.76, subdivision 3, clause (a). 6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate au- thorities in the County of Hennepin establish a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74 for the premises in the City de- scribed in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Resolution adopted. Member Bredesen's motion was the Council and the H.R.A. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Motion carried. Turner, Courtney seconded by Member Turner to adjourn the Joint Meeting of Turner, Courtney Gordon L. Hughes Executive Director EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MINUTES June 4, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner and Mayor Courtney. MINUTES of May 7, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Bredesen, seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, the meeting was po/ urned . / Gordon t. Hu es Executive D' ector MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 18, 1984 Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE FOR T. LEA TODD ADOPTED. Mayor Courtney read the following Resolution of Condolence for T. Lea Todd which was unamiously- adopted by the Council: RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHERAS, T. Lea Todd was a long time resident of the City, having brought his family to Edina in 1937; and WHEREAS, he was held in high esteem by all who knew him for his many civic interests and his selfless and timeless efforts in serving his community; and WHEREAS, he served on the Planning Commission for a total of twenty years and was Chairman for ten years, during Edina's greatest period of growth from 1943 to 1968; and WHEREAS, he was elected as President of the Village Council and served a two year term from January 1, 1944 through December 31, 1945; and WHEREAS, he was a strong proponent for the establishment of the first Edina Munici- pal Liquor Store with the proceeds thereof to be used for the development of parks and streets in_a rapidly developing community, and WHEREAS, he was a- charter member of the Edina Taxpayers Association which was organized in 1951; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council does hereby mourn the passing of T. LEA TODD on June 11, 1984, at the age of eighty -eight years, and extends its condolences . to his wife, Minerva, and to his children and their families; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that a copy be presented to his family. MINUTES of the Regular Council Meeting of.June 4, 1984, and of the Special Meeting of June 7, 1984, were approved as submitted by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON W. 44TH STREET IMPROVEMENT CONCLUDED; RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHOR- IZING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262. Engineer Hoffman recalled that at the meeting of_._._.._. May 21,.1984, the Council had continued the public hearing on proposed improvement of W. 44th Street to this meeting to allow staff to prepare a proposal which would address the concerns of the W. 44th Street residents as voiced at that meeting. Mr. Hoffman.reviewed the average current--.width in feet.of West 44th Street on a block by block basis, noting the years in which re- construction is proposed for the various segments. He stated that the project includes: a) structure replacement at Minnehaha Creek, b) concrete curb and gutter installation, c) concrete sidewalk (north side), and d) new bituminous surfacing. Mr. Hoffman recalled that issues of concern were: 1) street width, 2) parking restrictions, 3) structure location on Minnehaha Creek, 4) traffic volumes /speed, and 5) funding of the project. He then reviewed the possible alternatives: I) 36 feet wide (standard used by City), with parking allowed on South side and funding ... through gas tax monies with standard assessment to adjacent property owners; II) 32 feet wide, with no parking allowed and funding through gas tax monies with standard assessment; III) 28 feet wide (subject to State Aid approval on traffic), with no parking allowed and funding through gas tax monies with standard assessment; and IV) no build. As directed by Council, Mr. Hoffman advised that staff has been working on Alternative III and believes it may be possible to obtain State Aid funding but pointed out that state approval is dependent upon documentation that the traffic on W. 44th Street does not exceed 3,000 trips per day. A consultant has been brought in to verify,; traffic - :.counts and to prepare supporting data. He added that W. 44th Street is an exception to the normal collector street policy for several reasons. The right of way is only 50 feet wide instead of the normal 60 feet and the homes are sited closer to the street than normal. Mr. Hoffman advised that he had met with three of the properties owners who would be affected the most and that the 28 foot width had been measured out so that they could see -how it would - affect their homes. With regard to the structure at Minnehaha Creek, it can be placed to align with the street so it will not impact the back yard of the Bonn home. The structure would have sidewalk on the north side and a viewing area on the south side, with screening at the.viewing area to protect the Maxeimer's privacy. Mr. Hoffman noted that letters had been received from S. R. Maxeiner, Jr.,. 5101 W. 44th Street, and David and Adele Hersey, 4412 Grimes Avenue So., copies of which have been given to the Council. Jim Welna, 5139 W. 44th Street, stated that the residents on W. 44th Street continue to object to the proposed improve- ment, but that if the Council authorizes the project, Alternative III (28 foot 0 6/18/84 I width) would be acceptable to them. He noted that during the past two weeks there has been an increase of traffic on W. 44th Street due to maintenance work on T.H. 100 and if traffic counts.were taken during this time, that fact should be noted. Mr. Hoffman responded that the consultant is looking at traffic counts over the last 10 years, also is looking at possible future development in the area, and will be using Metropolitan Council statistics as to.traffic projections per household, etc., in writing his report to be submitted to the State. Member Bredesen asked Mr. Hoffman to review how staff concluded that the proposed improvement was a high priority project. Engineer Hoffman explained that staff reviews the collector street system in the City as to which streets are in need of repair or:structure repair. The bridge on W. 44th Street over Minnehaha Creek is one of two remaining in the City that did not meet current standards, which precipitated the W _ 44th Street project. Also considered, is the fact that gas tax funds can be expended for improvement of a state aid street. Those funds cannot be used for other types of improvements such as watermains, storm sewers, or sanitary sewers. Walter Schultz, 4390 Collidge Av., asked that if the project is ordered, that the City staff meet with the residents in the area to discuss the structural appearance of the bridge. Roselyn Sayre, 5013 Edenbrook Lane, stated she hoped the Council would consider the safety factor especially as it concerns the width of the bridge as she feels the present width is inadequate when meeting a MTC bus or school bus. Dennis Coyne, 4601 W. 44th Street, pointed out that there is a variance procedure that could be used if the State does not approve the 28 foot width for gas tax funding. He also "voiced concern that many trees would be lost if a width of 32 feet or 36 feet were authorized. Mr. Coyne asked if the bridge could just be repaired, to which Mr. Hoffman responded that if the Council's decision was Alternative IV no build, repairs would likely be made to the bridge structure but that in staff's view 20 feet is too narrow and therefore, it is recommended that the structure be re- constructed to at least 28 feet in width. He noted that the railroad bridge is 28 feet wide at present, but if it failed to pass the annual inspection at a future date it would have to be rebuilt to standards now set by.State:.Statute. Cathy Steim, 4520 W. 44th Street, stated that it is her understanding that W. 50th Street will be improved next year and also that parts of T.H. 100 and W. 362 Street will be closed for construction of the W. 36th Street interchange, and asked that the W. 44th Street improvement be constructed after those projects are completed to allow the traffic pattern on W. 44th Street to return to normal. Kelsey Smith, 4801 W. 44th Street, asked whether the MN &S Railroad had any plans for their bridge. Mr. Hoffman stated that railroad companies in past years have not built any of their structures on their own. When structures have become deficient, the replacement has been a State /Federal funded process. - Engineer Hoffman reminded the Council that the cost estimate presented at the meeting of May 21, 1984, was for a particular type of structure and that staff has not spent time on developing new estimated for alternative widths, depending on Council's action. If any action is taken to approve the project, it should be as preliminary to staff bringing back final cost figures. He indicated that the proposed assessment would be the same but that the State Aid costs would be revised.. After discussion as to how to proceed, Member Bredesen stated that he believed that the project is necessary, that work needs to be done on the bridge and that in response to concerns of the residents the street should be kept as narrow as possible, but that he was concerned about having no parking allowed on W. 44th Street.. No further comments.being heard from the public, Member Bredesen moved approval of Alternative III, 28 feet wide (subject to State Aid approval on traffic), with no parking allowed and funding through gas tax funds and standard assessment. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Member Richards asked if the.. intention would be to start the hearing process over if the State did not approve the 28 foot width for funding by gas tax funds, or if the hearing would be continued until_a response is received from the State. Member Bredesen.stated that the motion:. was- made :on.the assumption that State.funding.would be approved. .Discussion followed on whether or not the public hearing should be continued. Mr. Smith suggested that positive action be taken to authorize the project at the 28 foot width and that if the State then says no, to start the process over again. Member Bredesen commented that he felt it important that if the project is not approved by the State, that then notice be given to the affected property owners for public hearing on other-alter- natives. Member Bredesen stated he would withdraw the motion and Member Turner withdrew the second. Member Bredesen thereupon offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262 IN THE FOLLOWING: West 44th Street from Brookside Terrace to T.H. 100 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully adivsed of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said 6/18/84 improvement as described in the published notice of said hearing, except that with the roadway shall be 28 feet wide, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for con- struction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND BRIDGE REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262 and the area to be specially assessed for a portion of the cost of the proposed improvement shall include Lots 1 and 2, Block 3, Arden Park 3rd Add'n; Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 4, Arden Park 3rd Add'n; Lots 7, 8 and 17, Aud. Sub'd. No. 176; and Lots 10 and 11, Thielen's Brookside Add'n. Motion for adoption of the Resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Bredesen then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120- 140 -01 (WEST 44TH STREET) FROM BROOKSIDE TERRACE TO T.H. 100 IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of MSAS 140 (West 44th Street) from Brookside - Terrace to T.H. 100, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improve- ment of the street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in'the City of Edina has been determined; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 140 .(West.44th Street) at.-all.times. Motion for-adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR GUSTAFSON REPLAT OF LOT 5, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS NOT GRANTED BASED ON FINDINGS, DECISION.AND REASONS. Planner Hughes recalled that the public hearing on preliminary plat approval for the Gustafson Replat of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills, had been continued from the Council Meeting of May 21, 1984. It involves the subdivision of an existing developed single family lot into two new building sites. The Council requested staff to prepare written Findings of Fact, Decision and Reasons for the subdivision. Mr. Hughes stated the report has been prepared for Council review -and pointed out in the.Findings new testimony submitted for the first time. No. 11 - Reports on the study done by the D..N.R. concerning the ordinary high water mark of the lake which was estimated...to_be: 875:.8-Mean Sea Level, and also that based upon this elevation, the small pond.on.:_,-; the southerly portion of the project was indeed part of Arrowhead Lake. No. 14 - Reports on the area of the southerly lot.that would be buildable.if.a.:_100 foot conservation restriction abutting the lake were imposed as well as applying the required front street setback from Indian Hills Road. Staff's computation was that it would result in a buildable area of only approximately 675 square feet. Mr. Hughes advised that the Findings conclude that the proposed subdivision should be denied for the reasons as stated therein. He noted that included in the Council packet was a copy of a letter from Jeff Gustafson, the proponent, requesting with- drawal of the application for the subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills. It is the opinion of the staff that the matter should be .heard by Council. A note which was hand delivered prior to the meeting again verified that Mr. Gustafson had withdrawn from the plat, but that the owner of the property, Howard Bergerud, wishes to continue with the subdivision and would be retaining separate legal counsel. Mr. Hughes reiterated staff's recommendation that Council act to adopt the Findings, Decision and Reasons. Member Richards:asked.if Howard Bergerud, the applicant, was present or if he had made any request that the matter be continued. Greg Gustafson, representing Jeff Gustafson, stated he was told that the applicant preferred that it be postponed, that the applicant changed his attorney this afternoon, and that neither the applicant or the attorney could attend.the meeting. Greg Gustafson stated that he and his brother, Jeff Gustafson, are no longer involved in the proposed subdivision. Attorney Erickson opined that he knows of no reason why the Council should not act if it wishes to do so, and if the application for subdivision has been reinstated as the most recent letter requests, then it is appropriate for the Council to come to a decision. No object- ions being heard, Member Turner moved deridal of the proposed subdivision of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills, based on the Findings, Decision and Reasons prepared by staff. Motion for denial of the subdivision was seconded by Member Bredesen. Member Richards suggested that the Findings also state that Howard Bergerud, the applicant, appears to have known that he was the applicant of record, that he made no appear- 6/18/84 ance and that he had not requested, either himself or through his attorney, that this matter be continued, and no additional testimony or facts were presented. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS DECISION UPHELD ;. LOT COVERAGE VARIANCE DENIED FOR 4609 MOORLAND AVENUE. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the appeal of Carol and Robert Bossman with regard to a decision of the Board of Appeals and Adjustments on May 3, 1984, involving a single family residence located at 4609 Moorland Avenue. The - request was for a 1.7 percent lot coverage variance to allow the construction of a substantial addition to the existing house. The existing dwelling has approximately 2,000 square feet of living area not including the basement and the addition will contain approximately 1,800 square feet of living space. The subject lot has an area of 9,950..square feet with a permitted lot coverage of 25 percent or 2,488 square feet. The existing structure covers an area of 1,709 square feet or 17.2 percent of the lot. The addition (including the garage) covers 947 square feet addition area for a total coverage of 2,656 square feet or 26.7 percent. A 1.7 percent lot coverage variance is requested to permit 168 square feet of additional coverage. Mr. Hughes noted that the neighborhood contains many similar conforming lots with dwellings of similar size and age. Staff did not find in the immediate vicinity any history of lot coverage variances.. There have been some lot coverage variances in the Country Club District. However, those variances involved 50 to 60 foot wide non - conforming lots. The new Zoning Ordinance is designed to eliminate most of the variances on substandard lots, and would not have required variances if they were built or added to at the present time. Mr. Hughes pointed out that the proposed lot coverage was reduced in response to the staff's suggestion prior to the Board of Appeals meeting, but the proponent feels it cannot be reduced further in order to comply with the ordinance requirement.. When the request for lot coverage variance was heard by the Board on May 3, 1984, it was the decision of the Board that the proponent did not meet the requirements of the findings necessary for a variance and therefore denied the request. Robert Bossman, 4609 Moorland Avenue, advised that the planned addition to his house does meet all standards and code with the exception of the lot coverage, and that the request is for a 1.7 percent variance. Mr. Bossman presented a comparision of the proposed lot coverage for the addition with lot coverage of homes in the immediate vicinity. He stated that the proposed addition has been carefully designed to match the style and materials of the dwelling. A petition was also submitted signed by surrounding property owners stating they did not object to the variance, and many of the neighbors had appeared before the Board in support of the variance. He noted that the neighbor at 4607 Moorland Avenue commented that they wanted a larger garage than the proposed one. Mr. Bossman pointed out that the Country Club District has large homes on small lots and were 1920 -30 standard lots. Because of this, variances have been given and he called attention to a variance granted in 1982 at 4614 Wooddale Avenue for a one percent lot coverage for a lot very similar to the subject property. He explained that they had been working on the proposed addition for the last four years and had very carefully planned the addition to meet their family's increased space needs. The plans had been revised to reduce the lot coverage as much as possible but any further reduction would radically alter the design criteria. He concluded that there was a built -in variance given in the code, it was given for houses under 9,000 square feet, there was hardship that was recognized, it applies to the east Country Club area and that he found it incredible that that same hardship is any different from this one. Mr. Bossman asked for Council's support , of....the. - variance. Attorney Erickson then reviewed the statutory definition of undue hardship as-it applies to granting a variance. Member Turner recalled that in redrafting the Zoning Ordinance Council had specifically.discussed.the.25% lot coverage and had agreed that it was an appropriate percent, that in essence it was a guideline for density and open space in the R -1 District. She stated that none of the evidence presented in support of the variance persuaded her to look any differently at the 25 percent number and could not support the variance request. Member Bredesen com- mented that he felt the Country Club area is unique, but that probably no one would again build houses of that size on lots of that size. He stated he supported the comments of Member Turner as to percent of lot coverage and was concerned about sub- sequent requests if this variance was granted. 'Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards to move adoption of the following resolution: RFgnT.TTTT0M BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby concludes that the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 have been met, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the decision by the Board of Appeals and Adjustments to deny the variance request for Lot 5, Block 11, Country Club District - Brown Section (4609 Moorland Avenue) is upheld and the variance should not be granted. .Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 6/18/84 FIRST READING GRANTED FOR R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4) , FOR INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION; PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for rezoning of Indian Hills 2nd Addition, generally located west of Gleason Road and south of McCauley Trail West. The subject property measures 4.5 acres in area and is zoned R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is now part of the Crossview Lutheran Church site which encompasses about 14 acres. The request before the Community Development and Planning Commission was for subdivision of the property into ten lots and the rezoning of the lots to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District. The new lots would front on McCauley Trail. He noted that the major constraint to the development of the site is the location of the wetland located along the southerly portion of the property. That wetland has been classified by the Department of Natural Resources as a "public water ". As such, the filling or alteration of this wetland is restricted.and subject-to the grant-of a permit from the D.N.R. Although a specific permit request has not been formally reviewed by the D.N.R., it appears to comply with the grading plan and grading permit issued by the D.N.R. several years ago. Thus, the proposed develop- ment appears feasible from the .wetland standpoint. Mr. Hughes advised that the subject property is presently designated "quasi- public" by the Comprehensive Plan and if the rezoning request is considered, the Plan should be formally amended to designate this property as "low density attached ". That designation is the same as other properties which presently front on McCauley Trail. The proponent's plans also show a preliminary layout of a future parking lot on the property which will be retained by the Church. Although this parking lot is not now proposed or subject to approval as part of the subdivison, it is apparently shown to indicate that the Church is satisfied with the potential which remains on their site for expansion. It should be noted that parking lot expansions as well as building expansions require the grant of conditional use permits. The subdivision was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting of May 30, 1984. The Commission considered at that time the suggestion by staff that the subdivision be reduced from nine lots which front on McCauley Trail to seven lots. Lot 10 was originally shown along the southerly portion of the site and was not intended to be buildable. The Commission also reviewed a proposal that was submitted the night of the meeting which was a compromise to reduce the nine lots to eight lots providing lot widths of 100 feet which complies with the Zoning Ordinance but is somewhat less than double lots north of the Crosstown Highway in the Gleason Court Addition and others that front on McCauley Trail. The Commission concluded that the plat should encompass seven lots and agreed with staff's recommendation that Lot 10 should be eliminated by extending the lot lines for the seven lots to the south property line. In essence, each owner would own part of the wetland and therefore Lot 10 would not be subject to further subdivision or tax forfeiture. The Com- mission also agreed with the recommendation that Crossview Lutheran Church should dedicate the westerly 34 feet of the church property for public road purposes to serve the Naas property which lies south of the church building. In staff's view, the Naas property has an access problem for future development. A 16 foot wide strip of land adjoining the west side of the church property connects.-the Naas property to McCauley Trail. Although there is other property in the area owned by Robert Naas, staff's concern was that the property could be conveyed to others. Although future public road access to the Naas property could come from Post Lane to the west, the topography in the area would make such a road extremely steep. The Commission also recommended that the church now be required to connect to sanitary sewer. The City ordinance requires hookup within two years of-sewer availability. Mr. Hughes advised that the Commission recommended approval of the rezoning and the 7 -lot subdivision of the site, subject to these-conditions: 1) subdivision dedication, 2) developer's agreement which includes the extention of sanitary sewer to the site, 3) conservation restriction covering the wetland area, 4) grant of easement to facilitate storm sewer._extentions, 5) grant of a D.N.R. permit, and 6) petition to install permanent street surfacing and curb and gutter on McCauley Trail West abutting the R -2 lots. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that the developer's agreement would also require construction of a lift station. Charles.Sedgwick, 6124 Abbott Avenue, stated he is chairman of the Building Committee for Cross View Lutheran Church. He reviewed a letter which had been prepared for the Council regarding conditions to be imposed by the City in connection with the proposed rezoning and subdivision. Item #1 - Church connection to sewer-extension. - The Church requests that the sewer connection be required at the time of the church facilities expansion. Item #2 - The Church requests a.compromise of eight lots in the proposed plat. Item #3 - 34 feet of westerly Cross View property for street right -of -way - The Church suggests that when the Nass property is platted, they should deed a fifty foot strip along their north border to the Church as compensation. As an alternate, the Church would accept a 34 foot strip of the east side of the Naas property, again abutting the Church property. All costs of developing a road should be born by the developer. 6/18/84 The Church should be permitted to have access from this road and should be granted a variance in setback and permitted parking up to the road right -of -way. Dean Nadasdy, Pastor of Cross View Lutheran Church, briefly explained that the Church has been planning to the year 1990 with regard to ministeries of the Church. Two major programs are planned: 1) Pre - school and Day Care Center and 2) Christian Family Life Center.as their effort to the community. He affirmed that the Church sees the rezoning of the subject property as-the major contingency for sale of the land to provide funds for the Church's planned expansion. He voiced concern of the time span required for the public road. Mr. Hughes responded that con- struction of a public road would depend on development of the Naas property and that the City would not promote such development by constructing the road. Pastor Nadasdy also pointed out that the Church would benefit financially if 8 lots are approved for the plat. Discussion then followed on the issue of future access to the Naas property and the staff recommendation that the westerly 34 feet of the church property should be subject to a public road easement. Member Richards asked for an explanation of the recommendation. Mr. Hughes responded that when property is proposed for subdivision that as part of the planning process an attempt is made to lay the groundwork for proper access to other undeveloped properties for public road purposes, and that from a planning standpoint this was viewed as the best way to access the Naas property. Attorney Erickson pointed out that the ordinance states that when considering a proposed plat it must be looked at from the point of view of community planning, i.e. does it further community planning. Another aspect is providing access roads in locations that seem best suited and acquiring them at an opportune time. Member Turner suggested that the rezoning be approved and that the negotiating between the Church and Mr. Nass could continue. Member Richards commented that these are private negotiations and that the City should not be involved. Member Bredesen pointed out that if an agreement cannot be reached, the City still has the ability to acquire right of-,.way for public road purposes by eminent domain. Mr. Sedgwick stated that it was important to get the rezoning because of timing for the project and asked for a compromise of 8 lots for the plat. Calvin Kuhlman, member of Cross View Church, asked that the Council act on the petition for rezoning and platting and that the issue of the road easement be temporarily deferred. Member Bredesen submitted that the negotiation for the road easement be worked out by the ``parties involved on their own time frame and that the project be allowed to progress without approval of the recommendation that there be a dedication to the City for a roadway. Member Bredesen then offered Ordinance No. 825 -A4 for First Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 826 of the City is amended by adding _. the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of Lot 24, Block 1, The Timbers lying East of a line described as follows; Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot 24, thence on an assumed bearing of South 80 degrees 20 minutes 48 seconds East, along the North line of said Lot 24, a distance of 702.47 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 9 degrees 39 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 140.00 feet; thence South 22 degrees 20 minutes 50 seconds East a distance of 167 feet to the South line of said Lot 24 and there terminating." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption for preliminary approval -of a seven lot -plat, subject to conditions as recommended by.staff /Planning Commission, subject-to-the Church connecting to the sanitary sewer within two years from availability, except that the recommendation for a public .road easement of the westerly 34 feet of the Church property be not ratified by Council: RESOLUTION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF INDIAN HILLS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Indian Hills 2nd Addition ", platted by Gustafson and Associates, a Minnesota Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 18, 1984, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 6/18/84 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR SOUTHDALE LIBRARY AND SERVICE CENTER (PARKING LOT EXPANSION). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Planner Hughes presented the request of the Hennepin County Southdale Library, located at 7001 York Avenue, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow expansion of their off - street parking facility. He advised that Hennepin County proposes to undertake a renovation of portions of the building to accommodate new municipal court facilities which will occupy that portion now used for admin- istrative and technical services. The municipal court facility will include three courtrooms and staff offices. The proposed renovation will be completely internal and will not result in expansion of the building's.floor area. The Zoning Ordinance requires 10 parking spaces plus one space per 300 square feet for library uses and one space per 200 square for offices and courtrooms. Staff has reviewed the plans and has calculated a parking requirement of 360 spaces. The present parking lot provides 360 spaces, therefore, no additional spaces need be constructed in connect- ion with the renovation to comply with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Hughes advised that the applicant has conducted additional studies and has concluded that more parking is desirable and therefore, proposes to expand portions of the parking lot southerly and easterly to provide approximately 70 additional spaces. Setbacks for the expanded lot would be 10 feet from the south property line and 24 feet from the east line (Xerxes Avenue). The subject property is zoned R -1 Single Family Dwelling Unit District. Civic institutions are considered a conditional use in the R -1 District. Therefore, according to the Zoning Ordinance, a Conditional Use Permit is required prior to any such use being increased in floor area or any accessory parking lot being expanded. In this case, the parking lot expansion requires a Conditional Use Permit. Staff believes that adequate studies have been conducted to justify the parking needs of the facility and would encourage the applicant to provide a comfort margin of parking for the proposed new use. The proposed parking expansions complies with all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance concerning setbacks and other dimensions and the lot will be adequately screened by substantial landscaping. All findings required by Section 4D of the Ordinance have been met and staff would recommend approval of the permit. The Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of May 30, 1984, recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit. No objections being heard, Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 have been met, and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Condi- tional Use Permit to Hennepin County Southdale Library and Service Center, at 7000 -7009 York Avenue, for a seventy space expansion of the surface parking lot according to plans submitted. Motion.for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. H.R.A. /COUNCIL JOINT MEETING CONVENED FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Attorney Erickson advised that State Statute requires that a public hearing be conducted concurrently by the Housing Redevelopment Authority (H.R.A.) and the Council on the Grandview Area Redevelop- ment Plan,and Redevelopment Project. Member Richards' motion was seconded by Member Bredesen.to convene a joint meeting of the H.R.A. and the Council to hear the Grand- view Area Redevelopment Plan and Project. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Affidavit of.Publication in the Edina Sun on May 30, 1984, was presented by Clerk,,--,,-, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the proposed Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, advising that together the Plan and Project serve as the basis for the establishment of a tax increment financing project for the Grandview Area. The area is generally bounded by T.H. 100 on the easterly side, Vernon Avenue on the northerly and westerly sides, and Edenmoor Avenue on the southerly side. The Redevelopment Plan and Project were considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its May 30, 1984, meeting and the Commission recommended adoption by the H.R.A. and the Council. Mr. Larsen advised that in order to meet= the statutory requirements for the establishment of a tax increment district two documents are needed. First, the Redevelopment Plan which describes existing conditions, documents problems in the area, and recommends certain activities to correct problems and achieve goals and objectives established for the area. Second, the Redevelopment Project which serves as the finance plan for redevelopment activities. It estimates the public cost of the project, the method cf financing the cost, and the tax increment expected to repay the tax increment bonds. Mr. Larsen pointed out that Section II of the Plan describes existing 6/18/84 problems in the Plan Area including a substantial quantity of substandard build- ings, non - conforming buildings and land uses, obsolete uses, and under utilized properties. The arrangement of public parking and the inadequate amount of park- ing in the commercial core of the area are also identified. In addition, traffic and circulation problems set forth in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ", prepared by BRW, Inc., are incorporated into the Plan. Based upon these problems, the Plan concludes that certain redevelopment activities are warranted. Among the goals and objectives set forth in the Plan are: 1) To promote development and redevelopment in a manner consistent with the policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, 2) To improve the efficiency of the street system through implement of the road improve- ments recommended in the "Grandview Area Traffic Study ", 3) To promote and secure additional public parking in the area, and 4) To promote and secure the develop- ment of parcels with substandard and non - conforming buildings to more clearly define land uses and provide a more efficient utilization. The Plan also emphasizes improving the aesthetics and definition of the area through increased buffering, especially landscaping. Mr. Larsen advised that the Redevelopment Project No. 1 anticipates a total public redevelopment cost of approximately $4,500,000. This cost will be paid by the issuance of General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds and through special assessments against benefitting properties. The bonds would be amortized over 25 years. Public costs include the roadway improvements to Vernon Avenue and the construction of a 400 - stall, four level parking ramp on the site now housing storage facilities for the City. Expected private redevelopment includes redevelop- ment of the Biltmore Motel site with condominiums, increased retail and office space near Jerry's complex, redevelopment of three single family houses with eight town- house units, and redevelopment of the area containing the Biltmore Bowl; Jerry Leonards and a small office building with additional office space. A later redevelop- ment would involve the railroad property and the industrial area south of Eden Avenue. Mr. Larsen explained that the Plan is proposed to be undertaken in two or more phases. Phase I of the project would involve the following public costs: 1) Demo- lition of existing City storage buildings and construction of a two level parking ramp (approximately 200 spaces) with the ground floor reserved for City storage, 2) Road improvements referred to as Issue Area 1 in the Traffic Study, i.e. the Sherwood, Eden, Vernon intersection and Link Road, and 3) Construction of a major new intersection serving Jerrys, First Bank and Union 76, including access to the parking ramp. The total public cost of the Phase I project would be $2,556,000. It is proposed that 20% of the cost be specially assessed, leaving $2,150,000 for which bonds would be sold. The bond issue would be amoritized over a period of 25 years with the tax increment provided by redevelopment and a general inflation increment on the 51 parcels in the District. The Council and staff then discussed the involvement of.private.redevelopment in.the area, the amortization period, the inflation factor, hearings on improvement projects to be assessed to property owners in the district, funding for the City's storage facility and why the Plan and Project are proposed at this time. No objections being heard, Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RELATING TO THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN; APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO, THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. It has been proposed that the HRA approve a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, to be designated as the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelop- ment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 13, to be designated as Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelop- ment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Project, it has been further proposed that the HRA approve a tax increment financ- ing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan ") which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 9, to be designated as Grandview Tax Increment Fi- nancing District (the "District "). 2. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District are described in the attached documents entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" and "Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 to be Undertaken Pursuant to the Grand- view Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota," and the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District as so described are hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the 6/18/84 attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the im- plementation of the Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District. 3. The Redevelopment Plan and the Project were transmitted to the Community De- velopment and Planning Commission (the "Commission ") for its review and opinion. The Commission reviewed the Redevelopment Plan and Project on May 30, 1984, and adopted a resolution recommending adoption of the Redevelopment Plan and Pro- ject. 4. The Redevelopment Plan, the Project, the Financing Plan and the District, together with the written opinion of the Commission, shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing on the Redevelopment Plan and the Project pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521 and the Financing Plan pursuant to Minne- sota Statutes, Section 273.74, and subdivision 3. Attest: Chairman Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner,-Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Richards then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1 TO BE UNDERTAKEN PURSUANT THERETO AND THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT, MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. This Council has received the written opinion of the City Planning Commis- sion as to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the Project) and Grandview Tax Incre- ment Financing Plan (the Tax Increment Financing Plan) for Grandview Tax Incre- ment District (the District), and on June 18, 1984, held a public hearing on the same after notice of the public hearing was published in the Edina Sun, the official newspaper of the City, on•the 30th day of May, 1984. All persons desiring to be heard were heard. 2. This Council finds that the Project is a redevelopment project within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 13. The Project will contribute to the public health, safety and welfare. 3. This Council finds that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.73, subdivision 10, as seventy percent (70 %) of the parcels in the District are occupied by buildings, streets, utili- ties or other improvements and at least twenty percent (20 %) of the buildings in the District contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of internal parti- tions or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and at least an additional thirty percent (30 %) of the buildings in the District require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as inadequate street layout, incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density,-.obsolete buildings not suitable for inprovement or conversion. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the Project area would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The Redevelopment Plan for the redevelopment area within the City in- cluded therein will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound . needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of such areas by private enterprise; and .(C) The Redevelopment Plan conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 5. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74, subdivision 3, it is hereby found that: •d. (A) The District is a redevelopment-district as defined in Minnesota Stat- utes; Section 273.73, subdivision 10. (B) The proposed development in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment.financing is deemed necessary. 6/18/84 (C) The Tax Increment Financing Plan conforms to the general plan for the devel- opment of the City as a whole. (D) The Tax Increment Financing Plan will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the District by private enterprise. (E) The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minne- sota Statutes, Section 273.76, subdivision 3, clause (a). 6. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to request that the appropriate au- thorities in the County of Hennepin establish a tax increment financing district pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.74 for the premises in the City de- scribed in the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner to adjourn the Joint Meeting of the Council and the H.R.A. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S PARKS AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION. Mr. Kojetin introduced William Barbeau, advising that he represents six southwestern municipal- ities, including Edina, on the Metropolitan Council's Parks and Open Space Commission. Mr. Barbeau stated that he has met with the Park and'Recreation Board of the cities represented and is now appearing before the councils for input on regional issues and how the Commission might impact local government. He noted that the regional parks are under-utilized and that because of the amount of money that has been expended the Commission is trying to get feedback as to why they are not being used. The Commission is currently going through a policy revision plan and will be looking at a number of issues and will be conducting public hearings for formal reaction from councils and park and recreation boards. Mr. Barbeau then reviewed some of the major issues: special uses,.operations.and. maintenance funding, charging of fees, status of local open space and Council's involvement, level of municipal participation and control in regional open space. Member Richards asked that resources on these issues be coordinated through the Edina Park Board for discussion so that feedback could be provided. No formal action was taken. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 6/12/84 REVIEWED; APPROVED IN PART. Mr. Hoffman explained that with regard to the Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation for signalization of the intersection of Vernon Avenue and Blake Road that itiis. proposed to hold a public hearing on the issue during September,..1984. Regarding the recom- mendation for support of the upgrade of West 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue, he advised that some of the commercial developments, notably the Carlson Company, disagreed with the Hennepin County plan and had independent engineers draw up an alternative for review by Hennepin County, Richfield and Edina. The Committee.reviewed the revised plan and discussed its impact. Most of the changes occur within the City of Richfield and of main concern to Edina is the safety of West 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue and entry /egress to the Perkins Restaurant. The Committee recommended support for the plan provided that: 1) through and left turn movements at Xerxes Avenue be prohibited, and 2) entry to Perkins be maintained from both eastbound and westbound traffic. Member Richards suggested that action be deferred on the issue of West 66th Street until an agreement is reached by all affected commercial developments. Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner to- .:approve the following recommendation of the Traffic Safety Committee: 1) Signalization of Vernon Avenue at Tracy Avenue based on the existence of warrants; that action be deferred on Item A -1 (Upgrade of West 66th Street at Xerxes Avenue) to allow agreement by all affected commercial developments; and to accept Section C of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 12, 1984. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF WETLAND EASEMENT. As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF WETLAND EASEMENT LOT 6, BLOCK 1, THE HABITAT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for wetland purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: 6/18/84 That part of the wetland easement over Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn at right angles to the Northeasterly line, from a point on the Northeasterly line, a distance of 85.00 feet Northwesterly of the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun, being the official.newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicious places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851, Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR WETLAND ON PART OF LOT 6, BLOCK 1, THE HABITAT IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on July 16, 1984 at 7 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following wetland easement: That part of the wetland easement over Lot 6, Block 1, The Habitat, lying Southeasterly of a line drawn at right angles to the Northeasterly line, from a point on the Northeasterly line, a distance of 85.00 feet Northwesterly of the most Easterly corner of said Lot 6. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. EDINA FOUNDATION APPOINTMENT TO FILL DIRECTOR WYATT'S TERM DISCUSSED. Mayor Courtney advised that John Skagerberg had been recommended for appointment to the Edina Foundation Board of Directors to fill the unexpired term of Richard Wyatt. Following discussion it was agreed to delay action on the appointment so that a larger pool of names could be considered. No formal action was taken. FEASIBILITY REPORT 84 -3 APPROVED; HEARING DATE SET FOR JULY 2, 1984 FOR P -L -26 AND CASCADE LANE BERMING. Engineer Hoffman presented Feasibility Report 84 -3 for Ornamental Street Lighting for Ashcroft Lane and West 63rd Street and the Cascade Lane Berming, advising that the improvements have been investigated and it has been determined that they are feasible and would be in the best interest and toward the orderly development of the City. As recommended, Member offered the following resolution and moved.,:its adoption: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -26 AND CASCADE LANE BERMING 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice of 6/18/84 Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, July 2, 1984, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days.from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -26 CASCADE LANE BERMING The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, July 2, 1984, at 7:00 P.M. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: ESTIMATED COST Ornamental Street Lighting Improvement No. P -L -26 $ 850.00 Ashcorft Lane and W. 63rd Street Cascade Lane Berming 1,975.84 The area proposed to be assessed for the cost of the proposed improvements included Lot 19, Blk 2, Lot 8, Blk 3, Valley View Ridge Addition; Lot 1, Blk 4, Lot 3, Blk 3, Valley View Ridge 2nd Addition for Ornamental Street Lighting and Lots 2, 3, 4 Cascade Falls for the berming project. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PROPOSED MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT OF SHORELAND AREAS DISCUSSED. Attorney Erickson recalled that the Council had discussed and shown concern at the public hearing of the Gustafson Replat in Indian Hills regarding development of land within shore - land setback,areas. When the new Zoning Ordinance was adopted it was pointed out that the City did not have a shoreland.ordinance yet relating to the protection of those areas within 100 feet upland of naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, pending completion of survey work by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. At present such protection is obtained only in connection with the subdivision of land. There are some properties in the City where the 100 foot protection easement has not been obtained because the requirement was instituted after the plat of the property. Therefore, development of those properties could occur within the 100 foot area. Council may wish to authorize a study for the purpose of adopting a new ordinance or amend an existing ordinance as to whether it is advisable to require a dedication or grant of such protected area, not only in connection with a plat, but in connection with development of the property without platting. Mr. Erickson added that if such a study is desired, then in order to protect the planning process and health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina, the Council may consider it desirable to adopt an interim ordinance prohibiting construction of new improvements and expansion of existing improvements on lands adjoining lakes, ponds and streams. Member Richards suggested that it may be preferable for staff-to prepare a draft ordinance for dedication or grant of such protected area in connection with development of property with or without platting, rather than to impose a moratorium. Following-further discussion, Member Richards moved that the Planning staff be directed to prepare a draft ordinance relating to the protection of the 100 foot areas adjoining shoreland for consideration by the Council at its meeting on July 16, 1984. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PROPOSED ORDINANCE NO. 1040 (WEEDS AND TALL GRASSES) DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland pre- sented proposed Ordinance No. 1040 advising that the draft ordinance would put into one ordinance the prior proposed amendments to Ordinance No. 1211 and Ordi- nance No. 1031, relating to weeds and tall grasses, which were discussed by the Council on May 21, 1984. Mr. Erickson explained that Section 4 (Notice, Abate- ment and Assessment) sets out in more detail the process to be followed in removing 6/18/84 weeds as permitted by Ordinance No. 1213. The ordinance does not make any change in the height of grass before it is a nuisance, i.e., it is yet 12 inches or one foot. The main purpose of the proposed ordinance is to better define weeds and rank vegetation and establish a clearer procedure for removing weeds and tall grasses when a property owner refuses or fails to do so. Discussion followed as to the need for the proposed ordinance, the exclusion of City owned open space and to whether this would solve the repeated violations which have been reported. It was suggested that enforcement should be on a complaint only basis and that Section 1 should be revised to reflect that policy. Mr. Erickson reiterated that Section 4 setting out the procedure for enforcement was the main thrust of the ordinance. It was informally agreed to again consider the proposed ordinance after the suggested changes have been made. No formal action was taken. COUNCIL MINUTES OF 4/4/83 AMENDED AS TO PLAT ENTITLED "COLONIAL COURT ". Mr. Rosland advised that on April 4, 1983, the Council had granted final plat approval for "Westridge Estates ", platted by Donald R. and Shirley Berg. The plat has now been brought in for signatures and the name appearing on the mylar is "Colonial Court ". Staff would recommend that the minutes be amended to reflect this change of plat name. Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Richards to amend the minutes of April 4, 1983,, with reference to the plat resolution to read: "BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Colonial Court ", platted by Donald R. and Shirley Ann Berg, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 4, 1983, be and is hereby granted final plat approval, subject to payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $8,000.00 and execution of a Developer's Agreement." Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. TREE REPLACEMENT POLICY REVIEWED. Member Bredesen asked what the City's current policy is on tree replacement. Mr. Rosland explained that the City has been doing a.random planting of trees in the community to replace some of the trees that have been lost through Dutch elm disease or by storm damage. He noted that with the amount budgeted for tree replacement the City has been able to replace approximately 50 trees each year. No action was taken. REPORT GIVEN ON MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION. Member Richards referred to a written report he had given to the Council on the activities of the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) comprising 15 suburban municipalities which was formed during the last year. He noted that the major-thrust of this lobbying group focused on taxes during the 1984 Minnesota legislative session. On balance, it is perceived that the City has received value for its financial contribution to date. Member Richards recommended that the City continue with its involvement in the MLC. No action was taken. INSURANCE RENEWALS /1984 APPROVED. Mr. Rosland recalled that when the insurance policies were renewed last June,.it..was indicated that the City would stay with those agents. With the exception of the property coverage, the rates (per unit) have remained the same with the increase in premiums refelcting only increases in estimated payroll and /or sales. It is recommended that the Council renew insurance coverage with the following companies for 1984/85: Coverage - Company 1983 -84 .. :1984 -85 General Liability Home $ 35,153(29,880) $ 37,437 Worker Compensation Home 99,768 105,454 Liquor Liability Home 6,512 6,935 Auto Liability and Home 14,064(11,954) :_14,064(13,000) Auto Physical Property (buildings and Sayre & Toso 9,796 15,550 contents) and Business Interruption, Transit and Voting Machines Boiler Machinery Hartford Boiler 4,540 (Aug. renewal) Money and Securities Home 1,298 1,382 Mobile Equipment Home 2,096 2,225 Umbrella St. Paul Surplus 6,000 6,500 Ambulance Attendants Northbrook 900 900 Member Richards moved approval of the insurance renewals for 1984 -85 as presented, commenting that next year would be the last year of the three year renewal period and that Council should then review the three year renewal policy. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen. Ayes; Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. 6/18/84 SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 9, 1984. Mr. Rosland suggested that Council meet in special session to review a staff report on capital improvements. It was informally agreed to set Monday, July 9, 1984, at 7 p.m. as the special meeting date. MANAGER'S VACATION NOTED. Mr. Rosland advised that he would be on vacation the first week in July, 1984, and that Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Manager would act in his behalf during that week. No action was taken. CLOSED COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING LAWSUIT CALLED. Mr. Rosland advised that because of:a potential lawsuit against the City he would recommend that the Council meet in closed session immediately upon adjournment to consider strategy. Member Richards moved that the Council convene in closed session immediately upon adjourn- ment to discussion the litigation. Motion was seconded by Member Bredesen Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion'carried. ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A16 (TO ADD A CERTAIN FEE NUMBER) ADOPTED; SECOND READING WAIVED. Mr. Rosland presented Ordinance No. 171 -A16 advising that the amendment would add a fee number to Schedule A to identify the fee for a ventilation work permit and would recommended adoption. Member Turner moved adoption of Ordinance No. 171 -A16 with waiver.of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A16 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171 TO ADD A CERTAIN FEE NUMBER THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Schedule A to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended by addition of Fee No. 15d -5a to read as follows: ORD. SEC. FEE NO. NO.' NO. 433 6(d) Ventilation work permit 3. Domestic type kitchen or bathroom exhaust system Each system when vented individually in single or multiple dwellings $16.00 15d -5 Each additional system 5.00 15d -5a Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Bredesen, for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 6/14/84: General Fund $165,371.62, Park Fund $22,809.03, Art Center $3,679.53, Swimming Pool Fund $54,608.90, Golf Course Fund $13,269.92, Recreation Center Fund $4,238.38, Gun Range Fund $247.09, Waterwork Fund $22,833.64, Sewer Rental Fund $6,530.68, Liquor Dispensary Fund $112,033.91, Construction Fund $45,782.48, Total $451,405.18,- -and for confirmation of the following Claims dated 5/31/84: General Fund $106,664.11, Park Fund $3,102.80, .. Art Center $269.83, Swimming Pool Fund $1,189.16, Golf Course Fund $5,319.03, Recreation Center Fund $4,783.80, Gun Range Fund $80.03, Waterwork Fund $1,894.74, Sewer Rental Fund $310.16, Liquor Dispensary Fund $257,347.09, Total $380.960.75. Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ..JUNE .18, 1984 The Edina City Council hald a closed meeting regarding potential litigation at the close of the Regular Council Meeting of June 18, 1984. Present were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. Also attending were the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, City Attorney, City Engineer and Administrative Assistant. Following discussion on the Hansen Road Improvement, it was agreed to continue the meeting on Tuesday, June 19, 1984, at 5 p.m. in the Manager's Conference Room to further consider the issue. Assistant City Manager MINUTES OF THE CONTINUED SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 19, 1984 The Edina City Council met for a continued closed meeting regarding potential litigation on June 19, 1984, at 5 p.m. in the Manager's Conference Room, City Hall. Present were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney. Also attending were the City Manager, City Attorney; City Engineer and Administrative Assistant. Following discussion it was agreed by the Council Members present that the City should notify the residents on Hansen Road that the Council would meet with them on July 2, 1984 to discuss the various-road width possibilities to see if the issue can be resolved so that the project can proceed on time. Mayor Courtney then adjourned the meeting. Administrative Assistant John A. Miller Suite 400 4725 Excelsior Blvd. Minneapolis, MN 55416 June 21, 1984 Mr. & Mrs.Bernard Kuenzli 6528 Belmore Lane Edina, Minnesota55343 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Kuenzli: When the City Council considered my plat they indicated that we should get together and attempt to work something out. I am willing to meet with you at any time you would suggest. This can be during the day or in the evening. We have spent a lot of time trying to design tie proper layout. The city planning staff has confirmed that this is the best layout possible. You have indicated and Mrs. Kuenzli told the council that someday you will want to do something with your lots and will ask for variances. Perhaps now is the time to solve the problems of the area. In my plan you would end up with two standard lots in addi- tion to the lot where your house i_s. I would give you the required 7 feet along the west side of your lots 3 and 4. The vacation of Dearborn and Spruce would qive you another 6500 square feet. Your loss would be a street easement of 50' by 60' and you would have frontage on that street with your two new lots. Your net gain would be about 4,050 square feet in area. i You presently have 5 lots 69 feet deep and 100 feet wide. Two of these have homes built on them and the other three are vacant except for a garage. These three lots do not meet the minimum standards of the zoning code and present some serious building problems even under the "Grandfather" clause because they are only 69 feet deep. I have previously offered you $5000 if you were to give the easement to the city. We are anxious to have this matter resolved n � r• -2- 6/21/82 so something can be done with the property. An altern- ative is for us to request access by developing Dearborn anci Spruce to our property. You indicated to the Council that you might like to i:a\•c lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 left in a natural state. I responded that I would trade them for your lots 1 and 2. This means I could be trading an area 30,000 square feet for 13,800 sgLjAre ,:Oct. this. Please call me at 920 -8600 if you can find time to discLjss JAMwm c.c. Edina City Council VcN y tr.�ily '-ours, ohn A. Miller June 26, 1984 John A. Miller Suite 400 4725 Excelsior Blvd. ' Minneapolis, MN. 55416 & !'L ul i Mr. Miller, We received your letter on Saturday, June 23rd. We would not be interested in trading our lots 1 and 2, for those water filled lots.. After the recent rains, water has been standing. By taking 1/2 of our lot, you #are destroying the entire lot and the seven feet of property you are going to give us, does not compensate for the loss, also it certainly will not make it buildable. Have you investigated the possibility of coming in from the north? Has Hopkins been contacted? Your son indicated to us a while back that if we did not give him an easement, the property was still accessable. What happened to that plan? Also Mr..Miller, this was the very first time we have ever heard any mention of money to be offered for the property. Your son only quoted us the seven feet,.never has money bean mentioned to us until we received your letter. Any questions, feel free to callus at anytime. (938 -2269) Thank you, Bernard G. Kuenzli 6528 Belmore Lane Hopkins, MN. 55343 c.c..Edina City Council c.c. Gordon Hughes I. James Miller Suite 400 4725 Excelsior Boulevard Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 June 29, 1984 Mr. Gordon Hughes, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: Enclosed you will find the additional information that was requested by the City Council at the Junes 2 meeting. It consists of: 1. Cross Section This cross section plan illustrates a home built on Lot 3 with a rear walkout. That walkout elevation would be only one or two feet higher than the ground floor elevation of the Postier home. 2. Preliminary Development Plan This plan shows possible house locations and grades. 3.1 Grading Plan Dearborn Access This plan shows the probable grading cuts necessary for Dearborn and Spruce Streets if they were to be extended to provide a northerly access. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Very truly yours, rVlJ 11" ames Miller JM:bh Enc. • • m cn -°I ELEVATION O O O PROP. LINE LOT 2 HILLER ADDITION, N O- O r r ,. m O A N % C co- C) o PROP, LINE I'll PROP, LINE N - O v N n � m a� — O g D t0 r ph X oo— 0 O C 00 N m =! m N a O - O j V/ N O N O m PROP, LINE BLOCK 1 LOT 20 WEST MLPS. HEIGHTS, c c ® O HARRISON AVE. N O • • MILLER ADDITION I ' I I Ci V C i�.-C'C /.r n / '/ 1 / c?9 9- / v r •rei inr ar to ZtTz� 7 wrEA 7 M/ vvE.oR7ys 1VEi6'rs�_'? / 2a' 2: /Nt! 931 A.!/ . NN /NV 333. i I . . \ L 40 eat \ \\ \ \\ \` \� \� \� \ \� `,REM 6.r /!T t I MtL / 4i \ \\ / L / T (,/ i. %`i \\ \\ \ \`$' Kr \^ +f \`\ �\ IC'! ! / J / ���� / I ! �d \ '"IV 6 / \ \� \FIRST FLOO .952 I I PROPOSED DRANAGE rASOJ vJT' k fv ♦ . \y� / N / \ ; W. V. 945 DEA BORN , / a F E�T 1 10 M \eQ I ST � i � � ! �►._ �r I 1 t` \ \Z `tea \\\ \` '�' ' ` 1 // ' / /// _. L \ ��` /�� �`\. —�\• —`• oo IN v \ — t \ - -- 9i U T LO ��� A /Q�9g7f' /. w - >r / / / // ♦/ �� / — �� \ \ I V. \\ ly �jl / I , . / / ��� �4 t I I 1 A I s rr 4 / ��/ �- , / C' / / / \ \ \ \ V� \ \ 014'NER ¢` OEYE[OPEf tY y \l \\ ✓OnXS A/i7� J / V O p 1 I, 1 47x5 Excefsio1- BAV. h a I Suile 11414V tp .f% 10alS )CIP -h, V.17 C/C I1 /,t.C. /V Bose MOP Prepared 6y LAND SURVEYORS, 1AIC NOTES = —z [ [ / deser� ton derived Bain ri/r /on red PRELIiVmVARY PRE[ /M //-a Y DESCR/PT /O/V / by onihwes! Arsouoled Zawelltomls mc.. � D&OPEf AN C o/ 2. /h /ugh /O inclusive, b/ouf 1, WEST M/IViVEAPoL/S SCO/G" 11 a 2O / - _ - HE 16,475, //ennepin Cainiy, Aofnnesolo and fhof ,00ft of z pisJoncrs shown on %fie davno'ory ar said A✓of JAMES MILLER Me ad oininq o/ %y, voeoted, whit/) Iles Nor /herb arlhe Revs ed 4/30 84 Gr osem� hove been derived Prom Cavnfy ho/f -se+cf ibn sheers. Eor /er* exfelu a- of the sallh 11iye of solo' /o/ /O ono, whieh SAo m Sew oe sold Scr/filrr/y of the Eosfer /y erfension of the North line o! 3 Topoyro/ofiy shown was supplied by /he Oly of lal'iw . solo' /of 2. . -k -�: 4 2 faof contour in/e wo/ S- N G. K Q verfico /datum D �]�f ENGINEERING CO R TAi"/ n/nf Yrr11 /1/ MILLER ADDITION _ A / /- S -r A W / "I / p i C n4 14- I / / _ /," / / -Try . � . v L .+ q r7 / y �-7 / Ft� /ah ? '/ L /N✓. 93 s. 079 MN /NV. 933.9 F 74 AY 3 /6 Air PROPOSED DRAINA EAS�AENT (p 1 1 '.I � �1 c \ ,;, ��; �Id y-' �h 9c is �5/ :• \ �' I- � I 1 _ • 1 1 I �� l\ \ _ _ :m � / 7 / IDEA 80 N , / te)- � Al ST EBT / _ _ \r I n _ Iz- \ \ `r \\ _} ... / R E f I \ / / // / / /' �� S4 -- \ \\ i� \\ 1 - i vc U T L O A N�` �`. / y - \\\ \\ \t,j \ OWNER E DEVELOPER 9 AtA�i,/ //jl/ r / /i1/ \\ \\ \\ \ / LJ �_ \ �. 01 / 1 1 I ( I i V i c_ / v 111 �_ �� I .. y %� i v 1 \ \ 1 \ ✓ J I I p 1 • \ �fio',� .49y v ov w.otc o'IM� /✓ � 47251 Ixcelszor B/rd. J itlou )qbrk gun. I� � ssai�• /NV 94. \ p )A/ 1g �� -r C- r) n 1 7- ,4�r•�y -trA�. Bose Mo/o Prepor� by LAND SURVEYORS, /fvC. x NOTES / / PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE -� PRELWIWRY DESCR /PT /ON Ca/ 2 throlgh /O nxlwi✓e, b /oc/r 1, WEST "WA/E,4POL /S HE16N7S, Hennepin Counfy, Mwnesolo and Ihol part of the odo/ninq alley, vacafeo; whit// Iles Norther ly c{the Eos /e�y exfearv,n of the Sadh hire of solo' hf /O ano' whidi lies Sm lher /y. of the Easfer /y erfension of the Norfh hiv of solo/ /o/ e. 3co% =1'-- 20' Revised 4130184 _ 6rvd, ;7g,: Eos0t • e Storm Sewer Loc. /. Legal deSCriDhOn derived /io/n site 0/0n prewred by Norfhwesf Associafeo' rauz1116n1s, Inc. 2 alslam -s shown on /he aorindUry of 5010',0&/ hove been derived from Counfy ho/f - secfan sheds 3. 7opoyl -aphy shown was supplied by /fie Oly Of Eoiiaa 4 /00/ Confour /nlrrva/ S A/ G Y. Q Yerfica/ d0fum 6 •Tolo/ p/of area - 677 * syfY AND GRADING PLAN JAMES MILLER D [� ENGINMMG CO LOCATION MAP � s � -oil VIE V� :111:1 111 '4. UNION LOT DIVISION NUMBER LD -84 -12 Daniel Engelsma LOCATION Lot 1, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition 5940 Arbour Avenue EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT r►?m� _-nom EGA , FIELD & NOWAK SURVIEVOR 7415 WAYZATA BLVD. E F MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA ES�Ai. Itll go 9.5E kef °Z'1le 'Q.-V LF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY For JOE MAURER /c b 09 Abll %t �/i Ea5 feo �� 9.95, 'jlity Rail 892.�4— ��r,L/4� 38 ��' a ` 1� �, E NOTE: l N 69 W tn Eases � . C • s � N SCALE: 1 " =50' Bearings shown are assumed. k4?'�3 �goo•z� `695� J PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION 695 e , 1W.:A 04 I ift DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Bloc e►9•Fr i ¢ �; 1, CLAGRAMAR FOURTH ADDITION. OL I 'EC Zs we hereby Certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buildings, if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any, from or on said lend. Dated this-22nd _day of March , 1983 EGAN, I ELD d NOWAK, I C urveyor i le No 5869 8.00k No 2262-80 byl fh,,� • rr�x t� ral�'i vitiv ru)FttW-A-- �- r7 W-T Piz a m tmom I �4'MINIMOpt �4YFi3iG 1 \• ! l pyscuw -- 1 �tf ONITAM I' �I �I 1Gv.Y'.1LF i i RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 1, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition, and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition, and that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence South 28 degrees 16 minutes 42 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the easterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 64.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 15.32 feet; thence North 21 degrees 57 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet to the point of beginning. and Lot 2, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition, except that part of Lot 2, Block 1, Clagramar Fourth Addition described as follows: Beginning at the most northerly corner of said Lot 2; thence South 28 degrees 16 minutes 42 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the easterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 64.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 18 minutes 40 seconds West, a distance of 15.32 feet ;::thence�.N6rth--121_degrees_57 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of 50.00 feet to the point of beginning. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not - .waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1984. LOCATION MAP k � 1.IaN s� ����� mss' ■ Ste. � NUMBER S -84 -8 Blake Woods LOCATION Generally east of Dearborn Street and north of Belmore REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT r S -84 -8 Blake Woods. Generally located east of Dearborn pG "VA Street and north Belmore Lane. Mr. Hughes indicated that the subject property measures 52,500 square feet in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is composed of three, existing R -1 lots which each measure 100 feet by 175 feet. These lots fronton the unimproved northerly extension of Dearborn Street. The unimproved Spruce Road right of way adjoins the northerly, boundary of the property. The proponent xequests:a replatting of the existing three lots into four new lots which would be arranged around a new cul de sac on Dearborn. This cul de sac would be located opposite the westerly extension of Dearborn Street as proposed by the plat of Miller Addition which was approved by the Comission on May 2, 1984. If the proposed cul de sacs were constructed as shown the northerly 100+ feet of the Dearborn right of way, as well as the Spruce Road right of way, could be vacated and incorporated into the proposed lots. The applicant also proposes to vacate the alley adjoining the east boundary of the property and likewise incorporate it into the proposed lots. Mr. Hughes reported that the proposed replatting depends on access to Miller Addition which relied upon the acquisition of right of way across lots on the westside of Dearborn which were not owned by Millers. The City Council considered Miller Addition on May 21, 1984 and continued it until June 4, in order to consider the relationship between Miller Addition and the subject subdivision. /^ Staff believes that if thie:access is acquired, the proposed plat of Blake Woods, including the proposed right of way vacations, represents a reasonable replatting of the property'-and should be approved and that Miller Addition and Blake Woods represent the best approach from a planning standpoint. However, if access to the Miller addition is not acquired, some modifications to Blake Woods are needed. The existing access to Miller's property via Dearborn Street and Spruce Road must be preserved and therefore, no right of way should be vacated. If the City decides to improve Dearborn and Spruce to provide access for Miller, Staff believes that no cul de sac should be platted in Blake Woods, and instead the subject property should simply be replatted into four rectangular lots which front on Dearborn. He also mentioned as an alternative, access to Miller's from Harrison Avenue, to the West, was a possibility. If accomplished, Blake Woods could be replatted as now proposed which the cul de sac relocated somewhat westerly. The sanitary sewer is not readily available to this property. A main will have to be extended from either the westerly boundary of the Miller property to the west or from Arthur Street to the east. The extension from the west appears most feasible, but it again would require an easement from the lots west of Dearborn. Mr. Hughes reiterates its support from the proposed replat subject to the resolution of the access issues described above. If approved, Staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Subdivision Dedication. 2. Developer's Agreement which includes the extension of sanitary sewer and the looping of water mains. 3. Vacation of the rights of way as shown on the plat. 4. Submission of grading plan for the lots prior to preliminary approval by the Council. 5. A minor redesign of the proposed cul de sac to reduce its radius. Mr. Runyan asked if the cul de sac was allowed enough room for firetrucks to manuver. Mr. Hughes stated that it was a fairly standard size cul de sac. Mr. Runyan approved of the plan as well as Mrs. Shaw. Mrs. McClelland moved for approval subject to Staff's recommendations and Mr. Sked seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 30, 1984 S -84 -8 Blake Woods Refer to: Attached preliminary plat Generally Located: East of Dearborn Street and North of Belmore The subject property measures 52,500 square feet in area and is zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. The property is composed of three, existing R -1 lots which each measure 100 feet by 175 feet. These lots front on the unimproved northerly extension of Dearborn Street. The unimproved Spruce Road right of way adjoins the northerly boundary of the property. The proponent requests a replatting of the existing three lots into four new lots which would be arranged around a new cul de sac on Dearborn. This cul de sac would be located opposite the westerly extension of Dearborn Street as proposed by the plat of Miller Addition which was approved by the Commission on May 2, 1984. If the proposed cul de sacs were constructed as shown, the northerly 100+ feet of the Dearborn right of way, as well as the Spruce Road right of way, could be vacated and incorporated into the proposed lots. The applicant also proposes to vacate the alley adjoining to the east boundary of the property and likewise incorporate it into the proposed lots. The proposed replatting depends, to a certain extent, on access to Miller Addition. You will recall that Miller Addition relied upon the acquisition of right of way across lots on the west side of Dearborn which were not owned by Millers. The City Council considered Miller Addition on May 21, 1984. The Council continued the subdivision until June 4, in order to consider the relationship between Miller Addition and the subject subdivision. Recommendation The replatting of the subject property is inextricably linked to Miller Addition. Staff recommended approval of Miller Addition and its proposed access. If this access is acquired, we believe that the proposed plat of Blake Woods, including the proposed right of way vacations, represents a reasonable replatting of the property and should be approved. Again, Staff believes that the proposed plan of Miller Addition and Blake Woods represents the best approach from a planning standpoint. S -84 -8 May 30, 1984 Page two If access to Miller Addition is not acquired, however, some modifications to Blake Woods are needed. In our view, the existing access to Miller's property via Dearborn Street and Spruce Road must be preserved and, therefore, no right of way should be vacated ( except possibly Spruce Road east of Dearborn) . If the City decides to improve Dearborn and Spruce to provide access for Miller, Staff believes that no cul de sac, should be platted in Blake Woods, and instead the subject property should simply be replatted into four rectangular lots which front on Dearborn. As an alternative, access to Miller's from Harrison Avenue, to the west, may be possible even though right of way technically doesn't exist for such a street. If this is accomplished, we believe that Blake Woods could be replatted as now proposed. In this situation, the proposed cul de sac should be relocated somewhat westerly. It should be ..oted that sanitary sewer is not readily available to this property. A main will have to be extended from either the westerly boundary of the Miller property to the west or from Arthur Street to the east. The extension from the west appears most feasible, but it again would require an easement from the lots west of Dearborn. Staff again reiterates its support from the proposed replat subject to the resolution of the access issues described above. If approved, the following conditions should be imposed: I. Subdivision dedication. 2. Developer's Agreement which includes the extension of sanitary sewer and the looping of water mains. 3. Vacation of the rights of way as shown on the plat. 4. Submission of grading plan for the lots prior to preliminary approval by the Council. 5. A minor redesign of the proposed cul de sac to reduce its radius. / if / 9 � I `I ..�... -------- _--- 1._�... -- -E.... I \ � � � of ®EARBORN STREET �._ - - — -- -- - - - -- -- 195 \ o. _ - I _ z - � __ - - - - -- -r � � I I o I I I Ln m 120_ \13 II I \ I I 1 40 ,!Z6 D _ '✓ / D Lq- N -4 Jim N i- _ / _ 4�1 i0 I I I I I r I _ / D 401k I// F __ \� �f�a� — I A // /III --I vi /o �� / I I ap N i I I / / I ` O // , Z5' Qqb / / per O L9 \ I II N ��I I Sefi, / rAI f.... ..................... .. ..- 7-_• - - -... ..... -- - • -• - - -• _ - - -_• -- ------ --- - Ii5 VACATE 8' -ALLEY 1 I I -r ICO 5 I PROPOSED HANSENI13,OAD tj f � LI ge 3 typical section `3 Y P f a ---39 I - -- 33, !-fill section - - -- TI M'3EIZ W ALL -ii I a �Ivr o cut section a f tZataa 0 RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120- 151 -08 (HANSEN ROAD) FROM VERNON AVENUE TO W. 60TH STREET IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the improvement of MSAS 151 ,(Hansen Road) from Vernon Avenue to W. 60th Street, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Minicipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of the Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be necessary prequisite to the approval of this construction as a_Municipal State Aid project in the City of Edina has been determined; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, that the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the East side of MSAS 151 (Hansen Road) from Vernon Avenue to the Soo Line Railroad tracks at all times, and shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 151 (Hansen Road) from the Soo Line Railroad tracks to W. 60th Street at all times. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 2, 1984, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of July, 1984. A -717 &,dl City Clerk June 26, 1984 Edina Mayor and Edina Council Re: Hansen Road We have lived on Hansen Road for 19 years and have looked forward to the paving, curb, and sidewalk which was to begin June 18, 1984. We don't understand the delay. We were twice notified by the City Engineer and attended the meeting at which the improvements were passed. The lots on the west side of the street are not full lots and were squeezed in next to the railroad tracks and were priced accordingly. Please continue with the 36 foot width and sidewalk as planned. Thank you. 44a4 Bill and Shirley Rickord 5709 Hansen Rd. 929 -6043 v M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Mark Bernhardson, Assistant City Managerrf�' SUBJECT: Articulated Loader Purchase DATE: June 29, 1984 Attached are the following items: a). Request for Purchase b). Memo Gene Bartz to Fran Hoffman c). Memo on Total Cost Bidding from Ziegler, Inc. d). Submitted Bid Sheets As you will note, the staff is recommending award of bid for the articulated loader on a total cost bid basis to Ziegler, Inc. The only other response was from Road Machinery, Inc. who failed to submit a full bid as required. Additionally, it is the Staff's recommendation that it is cheaper in the long run to go with total cost bid giving us a new piece of equipment every five years at a per year capital cost equal to keeping one for 15 -20 years than going with low initial cost. (The depreciation is generally largest in the first 5 years.) While total cost bid is generally considered a "Caterpillar" promoted con- cept, the other major dealers including Road Machinery (RMS) have bid total cost in the past. (RMS has done so as recently as February of this year.) Should the Council desire not to award to Ziegler as the only respons;40 bidder, the bids will need to be rejected and rebid. REQUEST FOR PURC :IASE TO:, Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. Director of Public Works & City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City flanaver SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 29, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): Articulated Loader Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Ziegler, Inc. Z• Road Machinery & Supplies, Inc-. 3. "Amount of Quote or Bid See attached Not qualified bid. Failed to bid Section "B" and "C Department Recommendation: Ziegler, Inc. Bid "C"- - $108,603.00 Repurchase- $88,5.00.00 with Net of $20,103.00 �� Dir. of Public Works Si ur Department rancis J. Ho man Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is J is not within the amount budget for the purchase. . ri, ualen, t finance Director City anager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recoinnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: 9 9 S. PROPOSAL (To be opened June 27, at 11:00 A.M.) PROPOSAL OF 7ipglpr Tnr, ADDRESS qnj blest 94th Street CITY & STATE Bloomington, MN. 55420 PHONE (612) 888 -4121 for the furnishing and delivery of one (1) Four Wheel Drive Articulated Loader to the City'of Edina, in accordance with the attached specifications which were submitted with this Proposal and upon which this Proposal is made. MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NO.: MACHINE Caterpillar 950B QUICK COUPLER Ba I ders—on ITEM DESCRIPTION BID "A" 1. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 C) Net Price BID "B" 2. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 c) Sub Total d) 5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance 3) Total Net Price BID "C" 3. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 TOTAL PRICE $108,803.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 102,803.00 ..$ 108,803.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 102,803.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 108,603.00 $ 108,803.00 $ 6,000.00 c) Sub Total $ 102,803.00 d) Plus 5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance $ 5,800.00 e) Sub Total $ 108,603.00 f) Less 5 Year or 6500 Hour Guaranteed Repurchase $ 88,500.00 ms: 9) Total Net Price $ 20,103.00 ac tided in our bid price is an automatic shut down for low oil pressure and high coolant temper a ur Shou dd thh CCity of Ed'pp decide to have, ust the Electronic Monitoring System which is s anedard on lge 9 06, deduct 1/95.00 from our b� price. Craig hydraulic system including pump, valve, an hoses for mounting City of Edina Craig wing or new Caterpillar 950B.Wheel Loader if required, not installed, add $1850.00 to our bid price. PROPOSAL (To be opened June 27, at 11:00 A.M.) PROPOSAL OF Road Machinery & Supplies Co. ADDRESS 4901 West 80th Street CITY & STATE Bloomington, MN. 55437 PHONE (612) 835 -3535 for the furnishing and delivery of one (1) Four Wheel Drive Articulated Loader to the City'of Edina, in accordance with the attached specifications which were submitted with this Proposal and upon which this Proposal is made. MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NO.: MACHINE Clark Michigan 75C QUICK COUPLER American ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL PRICE BID "A" 1. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler $ 84,645.00 b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 $ 3,500.00 C) Net Price $ 81,145.00 BID "B" 2. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler $ b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 $ c) Sub Total $ d) 5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance $ 3) Total Net Price $ BID "C" 3. a) One (1) Loader with Quick Coupler $ b) Less: Trade -in Cat Grader Model 12 $ C) Sub Total $ d) Plus 5 Year Guaranteed Maintenance $ e) Sub Total $ f) Less 5 Year or 6500 Hour Guaranteed Repurchase $ g) Total Net Price $ M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer FROM: Gene Bartz, Superintendent of Public Works SUBJECT: Purchase of Articulated Loader DATE: June 29, 1984 It would appear to me that Ziegler Inc. has submitted the most complete bid for the loader. This can not be said for Road Machinery and Supplies Co, of Bloomington. They did not fully comply with Section A.3 "City of Edina, Instructions to Bidders ". They neglected to complete Bid "B" and "C" of their proposal. The omission of these sections clearly is in violation of the instructions as well as leaving out two vitally import- ant points: 1) Guaranteed Maintenance and 2) Repurchase Agreement. It is important to have a guaranteed maintenance program to protect the City past the first year of usage. It seems that major equipment flaws generally surface before the end of a five year period. While a guaranteed maintenance program is important, even of greater importance is the repurchase agreement. Road Machinery's proposal was absent of the section. Our equipment and most especially loaders get more rugged use than any other single piece of machinery. They are used for dirt moving, gravel digging, snow removal, tree removal and a host of other applications. They get year round use with the City, unlike that of construction companies. The metal within the machine probably endures more stress and strain than any other in the department. Hennepin County has recently been able to of their machinery on a five year rotation the very costly maintenance is eliminated. Edina Public Works Department. In the cas able to recover 85% of the total net price ment machine in five years. GB: jr replace a considerable portion basis. Subsequently, much of This would be my hope for the e of this loader, we would be towards the cost of a replace- TOTAL COST BIDDING One of the most important jobs of a governmental official is to purchase goods and services for his agency. Taxpayers rightfully expect that these purchases reflect the lowest possible overall cost. A competitive bidding procedure was established to insure that.this holds true. The low initial price method of buying was the first method used. It Is a very simple method, and in many cases, adequate for small, low price items. It was up to the officials to make a judgement as to what was the "best" bid among those submitted, and make an award based on this judgement. A problem arose, though, with higher cost items. It became extremely difficult to establish by "judgement" which was the "best" bid when greater amounts of money were at stake. It became clear that initial price wasn't the only factor to be considered in these purchasing decisions. Therefore, another method was developed to assist governmental officials in putting a dollar and cents figure on quality, performance, reliability and after - purchase services. This purchasing method is known as . . . . TOTAL COST BIDDING Total Cost Bidding lets governmental officials consider all major cost factors before a purchase is made. It's a purchasing method which guarantees what the maximum machine costs will be for a specific period of time. in most cases for a 5 year period. With a Total Cost Bid, governmental officials know everything they need about a machine purchase ahead of time . . . the initial price, maximum repair costs, maximum scheduled maintenance costs and the minimum value that's guaranteed after the contract period ends. Hidden and unexpected expenditures are eliminated . . . budgets are never exceeded. INITIAL PRICE (LESS TRADE) + REPAIR GUARANTEE + SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE GUARANTEE - MINIMUM VALUE GUARANTEE TOTAL COST BID An evaluation of the Total Cost Bid method of purchasing begins with the initial price, minus the trade -in on an old machine (if any). Total Cost Bid doesn't stop with the initial price as does traditional low -bid buying. A Repair Guarantee of maximum costs for repairs over the contract period is included. If repairs cost less than the guaranteed maximum, the purchasing agency pays less. Total repair costs will never exceed the guaranteed maximum figure. Knowing in advance what maximum repair costs for a machine will be is important, but additional benefits are included In the Total Cost Bid specification. First, Total Cost Bidding protects an agency from excessive downtime. Downtime is a seldom measured cost that can many times be higher than costs of repairs. Especially when important jobs such as snow removal are held up. Most Total Cost Bid specifications include a penalty for excessive downtime. The specification calls for a cash payment after a specific number of downtime hours, or a stipulation that a replacement machine will be furnished until the repairs are completed. Secondly, Total Cost Bidding is a positive method of keeping a dealer committed to good parts availability and prompt mechanical service. Most makes and models of machines are only as good as the dealer that backs them up. A solid dealer will readily agree to provide a commitment on a Total Cost basis. Another area in which a maximum cost is defined is Scheduled or Daily Maintenance. The Scheduled Maintenance Guarantee of a Total cost Bid clearly states that periodic lubrication and maintenance costs will not exceed a specified amount. Routine lubrication, oil changes, filters, gaskets and adjustments vary considerably from one machine to another because of inherent design. The difference in parts and labor can be substantial over a period of time and, therefore, should be a specific bid item. The last major area to evaluate is the Minimum Value Guarantee. A poor quality machine could depreciate in value very rapidly compared to high quality, well built machines. This depreciation cost difference can many times be 30 to 40% of the purchase price. It is, therefore, important to write into the specifications a Minimum Value Guarantee for the bid machine during the contract period. The usual way of specifying the guaranteed minimum value is to require dealers to bid a figure at which they will buy the machine back at any time during the contract period. Even though most machines are not turned back at the end of a contract period, the agency has this option in the case of a rapidly depreciating machine or one that has been extremely troublesome from a downtime and repair standpoint. In addition, this clause allows agencies to turn machines back if they exceed their needs or are no longer applicable to the type of work that they are doing. Specifications for this guarantee are written to allow the agency the option of keeping the machine, trading it to other dealers, selling it on the open market or selling it back to the dealer at the Guaranteed Minimum Value. There it is . . . Total Cost Bidding. It's not the simplest method of buying, just the best method. - 2 - Total Cost Bidding helps governmental officials with the important decision- making process in buying equipment. It gives the agency the best machine available on a total long term basis rather than just lowest initial price. If specifications are written carefully, and all cost items are included in the bidding formula, the machine with the lowest total cost should win the bid. This provides a very positive protection of taxpayer dollars as well as allowing the governmental officials to work from a position of confidence when making their decision. There can be no critical views of their actions when the bid is awarded to the dealer with the-lowest total cost backed by a bond. Total Cost Bidding determines and defines. all of the cost factors in owning a machine for the specified period of the contract. This eliminates the problem caused by officials making a decision that future officials will have to live with. In addition, Total Cost Bidding allows for more consistent and exact long range budgeting. Total Cost bidding is not a gimmick. It provides complete protection for the governmental agency and in no way favors any particular manufacturer or dealer. Almost all manufacturers and dealers have or will bid on a total cost basis when their machine meets an agency's specifications. Any dealer who does not bid on a Total Cost Bid basis probably has good reason. His machine or his dealer backup are probably insufficient in a way that would eventually cost a good deal more than would be the case with other comparable machine. Total Cost Bidding does not cost more. Some dealers will cut their price on an alternate outright purchase bid as compared to their bid on a Total Cost basis. They are merely showing the true value of their machine. The difference that these dealers show in initial price between the two bids, is needed as a cushion to protect them against the guarantees they must make to cover higher maintenance, repair and depreciation costs. Total Cost Bidding Is not a system to require agencies to trade machines every five years. The Total Cost Bid specification, even though written for five years, provides the basis for an evaluation that protects the governmental agency for ten, twenty or thirty years on a machine purchase. If a machine is not right, it will generally be known before the end of five years. The five year Minimum Value Guarantee stipulation is like an insurance policy that lets the governmental agency return a machine which would eventually cost them more than it should. Minnesota governmental officials can be proud of their record. More than half of the governmental bids for heavy equipment in Minnesota are written on a Total Cost basis. IN MINNESOTA, WE PUT IT IN WRITING. - 3 - 4405 Browndale Avenue, Edina, MN 55424 June 28,1984 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney City of Edina 4801 West 50th. St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Courtney, The Health Advisory Board at its meeting on June 13th. spent a considerable amount of time, reviewing the contracted community health services provided to the City of Edina by the Bloomington Division of Health. CHS Administrator, Yvonne Hargens and three of her administrative staff presented us with a very informative and comprehensive review. We know that the contract for community health services is renewed yearly and that the usual time for re- negotiating those services occurs each fall. We also know that the two year Community Health Services Flan 1986,1987 will need to be developed one year from now. We would like to begin looking at the needs of residents in Edina now, as well as evaluating the environmental and community health services which are currently in place. We would like to suggest that Community Health Services be contracted biennally to coincide with the Community Health Services Flan. If the purpose of the CHS plan is to assess needs, establish goals, and to plan for two year cycles, it would seem reasonable to operationalize our Community Health Services contract for that same period of time. In that way the City is assured of continuity of services in the six general areas covered under Community Health Services: the agency has a chance to develop the necessary community linkages with other resources,(which take time),and to develop any special programs which have been determined in the Flan. We would like to recommend that the Bloomington Health Division be awarded the Community Health Services contract for 1985, and that we not negotiate with another provider organisation at this time, unless of course, the proposed Bloomington budget significantly exceeded their 1984 costs. I would be glad to talk with you or the City Council members further about this, so feel free to contact me at my home address. I would appreciate knowing the Council's decision. Sincerely yours, Barbara C. Reynolds, MPH, RN Chair �a GRANT OF TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT THIS INSTRUMENT, Made this day of , 1984 by and between Louis J. Regan and Frances L. Regan, husband and wife, of the County of Hennepin and State of Minnesota, "Grantors" and_the City of Edina, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, "Edina ". WITNESSETH, that Grantors, in consideration of One and No /100 Dollar ($1.00), to them in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by Grantors, do hereby Convey and Quit Claim to Edina a Temporary Easement for the purpose of crossing and recrossing over and across the following described property (the "Easement Area ") with workers and equipment for the purpose of cutting, harvesting and removing aquatic vegetation from Mirror Lake: That part of the East 100 feet of Lot 34, Auditor's Subdivision No. 325 lying north of Blake Road, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said Temporary Easement is granted subject to the following conditions, restrictions and agreements which Edina hereby accepts and agrees to: 1) The Temporary Easement shall cease and terminate upon the earlier of (a) that date which is ten years after the date of this Grant of Temporary Access Easement and Agreement set forth above; or (b) the date of record- ing of a deed whereby the above described property is conveyed by Grantors, their heirs or representatives; whichever first occurs. 2) Only employees and contractors of Edina and employees and agents of such contractors may enter upon the Ease- ment Area and then only for the purposes above stated. 3). The Temporary Easement shall not grant to Edina or the public the right to use the Easement Area as a public park or for any other purpose except that for which Y" the Temporary Easement is specifically granted as des- cribed above and members of the public shall not acquire any access to Mirror Lake or the right to make any im- provements on the Easement Area for public park or other purposes. 4) Edina hereby agrees to indemnify Grantors and their heirs and representatives against and to hold Grantors and their heirs and representatives harmless from, any and all claims, demands, losses, expenses (including reasonable attorneys fees), actions or causes of action of any kind, which may be suffered by or made or brought against Grantors and their heirs and representatives, or any one or more of them, and which arise from or in connection with or, in any manner, are related to,� the use of the Easement Area by Edina its employees or contractors or the employees or agents of such con- tractors or any act or neglect occuring in connection with, during or related to such use. 5) Edina may undertake improvements to the Easement Area as are necessary to allow the use of the Easement Area by Edina for the purposes authorized by this Temporary Easement provided that Edina first secures the permission in writing from Grantors to such improvements and pro- vided further that Edina shall have constructed a barri- cade adjoining Blake Road to prevent access by the gen- eral public to the Easement Area. 6) By executing this Grant of Temporary Access Easement and Agreement, Edina represents to Grantors and their heirs and representatives that such execution has been duly authorized by all necessary action of the Edina City Council and any other required municipal officer, agency or body and that the covenants and agreements on the part of Edina herein contained are valid and binding obligations of Edina enforceable against it in accordance with its terms. -2- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors and Edina caused this instrument to be duly executed the day and year first above written. Louis J. Regan Frances L. Regan CITY OF EDINA By Mayor And STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) Manager On this day of , A.D. 1984, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Louis J. Regan and Frances L. Regan, husband and wife to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the County and State aforesaid, do hereby certify that on this day appeared before me and , known to me to be the Mayor and Manager, respectively, of the CITY OF EDINA, who signed and acknowledged the foregoing instru- ment in their official capacities as officers of said municipal corporation. Given under my hand and notarial seal this day of . 1984. THIS DOCUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM DEED TAX This instrument was drafted by: Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett 3400 City Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -3- Notary Public I M 4 G 1-11 mi 11111,171, 1 :__1W league of minnesota cities June 20, 1984 TO: Mayors, Man; ( rs, Cle, FROM: Donald A. S SUBJECT: Reappointment of Legislative Study Committees and Legislative Contacts Enclosed please find forms to be used to indicate interest in membership on LMC Legislative Study Committees for the 1984 -85 legislative session and for assignment as a Legislative Contact for League lobbying activities during that session. It is important to take time now to indicate interest for these positions in advance of the convening of the 1984 Legislature. You will note that we have combined the Personnel, Pensions and Labor Relations Committee with the Public Health and Safety Committee, with the resulting new title of that committee being Personnel and Public Safety. These are the major study committees which will be active in the LMC legislative policy development for the next two years. Please note that membership on these committees requires a two -year term of service, ending June, 1986.. The committees are a vital part of the League's program and efforts to address city issues at the legislative level. The legislative contact system is one on which the League depends for .local response to.legislative._issues during session. It also is a vital part of the League's legislative program, and you are encouraged to apply for these positions-as well. The League attempts to have a wide distribution of Legislative-Contacts throughout the state.in order to.make sufficient notice available to legislators of local interest in pending legislation. Also enclosed please find a list of the upcoming regional meetings for late August through September. The League is now contacting host cities to send invitations to cities in the surrounding area to encourage their participation in those meetings. You should be hearing from the host cities within the next month. If you receive an invitation from a host city, but feel it would be more convenient to go to another site for a regional meeting, please contact that particular city. - OVER - 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 551 01 (61 2] 227 -5600 Page 2 Memorandum June 20, 1984 This year's regional meetings will concentrate on two very important areas of state activity: economic development and assistance to local communities and businesses and implementation of the comparable worth requirements at the local level. In both the afternoon and evening sessions, the League intends to have presentations to city officials by the state departments responsible for these activities. I'm sure you will want to schedule time for staff and councilmembers to be at these meetings since both of these areas are of vital importance to cities, and in the later case, there is a deadline for city implementation of pay equity plans for city employees to be submitted to the state. The League will be working with the Department of Personnel to plan for these presentations, both in the afternoon and evening sessions of this year's regional meetings. Finally, the League will also be asking member cities at regional meetings to help us set goals and develop long -range strategic planning for the League. That particular request for participation is still in the planning stages but will be a part of the evening program this year. The district coordinator program that has been a part of the League lobbying effort for the past two years will be in operation again for the 1984 -85 legislative session. We will be re- contacting currently serving District Coordinators in over 20 state senate districts during the next months to determine their interest in continuing in that program. Following the November elections, the League may be contacting other city officials throughout the state to determine if there are additional districts where we can establish district coordinator programs. You will hear further from us on that matter. Attached please find a notice of public hearings to be held in June on possible changes in forest taxation. These hearings are to be held by the Legislative Advisory Task Force on Forest Taxation. The other hearings also to be held this month are for demonstration grants for rural development. These-grants-are available through the Governor's Council on Rural Development. _Please consult.the attached memo for details. DS:mk Im Inn U league of minnesota cities LEAGUE LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMITTEES The League of Minnesota Cities legislative study committees are being reorganized following the annual conference. These study committees will each be meeting three or four times (starting before regional meetings in September) to develop legislative policy for the 1984 -1985 legislative session. The committees will conclude the 1984 work by the end of October, and the League membership will vote on the proposed policies at the annual League Legislative Conference on January 29 -30, 1985. The committees will repeat a briefer cycle of meetings in the fall of 1985 to update the policies for the 1985 portion of the legislative session. IF YOU WISH TO SERVE ON A LEAGUE LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMITTEE AND /OR HAVE SUGGESTIONS FOR ITEMS FOR STUDY, please complete this form and return it to the annual conference information desk, or mail it to the League by July 6 The President of the League will appoint study committee members and, as in the past, an attempt will be made to balance the membership of the committees between larger and smaller cities and cities from throughout the state. I WOULD LIKE TO SERVE ON ONE OF THE FOLLOWING LEAGUE LEGISLATIVE STUDY COMMITTEES (indicate preference and priority by 1,2,3, etc.) Revenue Sources (State aid and credit payments to cities, levy limits,•and other issues affecting city finances Personnel and Public Safety General Legislation and Government Structure (including data privacy, open meetings, election laws, etc.) Land Use, Environment, Energy and Transportation Development Strategies (tax increment financing, industrial revenue bonding, other financial methods for community development and capital improvement) WHETHER OR NOT YOU INDICATED ABOVE A DESIRE TO SERVE ON A STUDY COMMITTEE, PLEASE COMPLETE THE REST OF THIS FORM. 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (61 2) 227 -5600 Page 2 Legislative Committee Study Form The League should develop legislative policy on the—following 'legislative issues: Name Title Address City Telephone ( ) AH:mk Zip Code mi [I-JJ league of minnesota cities LEGISLATIVE CONTACT FORM This form must be returned if you would like to be a Legislative Contact for the 1984 -85 session of the Minnesota Legislature. A follow -up mailing will be made after the November elections to obtain additional information from you. League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Contact receive a free subscription to the weekly Legislative Bulletin service. As a Legislative Contact you will be expected to contact your legislators on major issues of state -wide concern. You will be briefed in advance of these contacts by League of Minnesota Cities staff through the Legislative Bulletin, "Action Alerts ", and personal contact by phone and meetings in your area. If you wish to serve, return the portion below Joel Jamnik, League Legislative Counsel, at the address below. YES! I WANT TO BE A LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES LEGISLATIVE CONTACT PERSON Legislative District Name of Senator Name of Representative My Name My Title My City Zip My Home Phone AC MY Work Phone AC AH:mk 1 83 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (6121227-5600 r� • mi league of minnesota cities 1984 League of Minnesota Cities Regional Meetings Tuesday, August 28, 1984 Roseau Wednesday, August 29, 1984 Twin Valley Thursday, August 30, 1984 Herman Tuesday, September 4, 1984 Chisholm Wednesday, September 5, 1984 Barnum Thursday, September 6, 1984 Breezy Point Wednesday, September 12, 1984 Paynesville Thursday, September 13, 1984 Elk River Tuesday, September 18, 1984 Luverne Wednesday, September 19, 1984 Cottonwood Thursday, September 20, 1984 New Ulm Tuesday, September 25, 1984 Rochester Wednesday, September 26, 1984 Lonsdale AH:mk 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612)227-5600 TO: Mayor & Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works N VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: Parking Ramp Repair - South Ramp Our south parking ramp at the 50th and France Business Area is in need of repair on the old level adjacent to Lund's. The level in question is the original deck built in 1969. The City has conducted repairs on the deck in 1979 and 1981 per our consultant's recommend- ation. This year's inspection indicates some additional repair is necessary. The repair is more than can be constructed by our City crews. We have prepared plans to repair approximately 10% of the deck. The funding necessary for the project is available from our 320 Replacements Account in Public Works and parking fees collected from 50th and France employee parkers . We would recommend authorization of bids for said repair project.. KR: FJH:lm 6/29/84 Pastors O A ROGER R. ANDERSON GARY L. HANSON RICHARD A. DAVIS E. RICHARD BROWN ROBERT L. NFRE HERS Christ Presbyterian Church CARL L. NIAFRED 6901 Normandale Road, Ainneapolis, Minnesota 55435 -1599 : Telephone (612) 920 -8515 June 20, 1984 Edina Village Council Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 To the Edina Village Council: We would like to inquire about the use of the property that we own north of 69th Street, accross from our property. Do the laws of Edina prohibit our using this for a parking space? We realize that there's been concern within the neighbors about this. But we just want to know, would it ever be possible for us to make this into a parking lot? We have received conflicting reports about this question and would like clarification from the Village Council on this question. Sincerely, e). -- uane Nelson, Chairperson Property Committee DN /mb DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South 11� . HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 ���NES�P 935 -3381 LFUTTY 935 -6433 June 25, 1984 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 CSAH 17 (FRANCE AVENUE) AT I -494 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 7927 Dear Mr. Hoffman: This is a request for a resolution from the Edina City Council that prohibits parking on both sides of France Avenue within the limits of the I -494 inter- change revision project. This resolution is required by the Mn /DOT State Aid office for approval of right of way plans. Attached are plan sheets for the interchange revision project. Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this proposed construction. Sincerely, Vern Genzlinger, P.E. Chief, Design Division By: Tenner M. Tangen, P.E. Associate Administrative Engineer AWH:Iar Attachments S , No Alnt("ordu x0 Z u t �1�� o ie S u l I � v. , ''` 1 HENNEPIN COU eRe an equal opportunity employer V�� CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand Deposits Working Fund Contracts Receivable Loan To Other Funds Inventory: Liquor Wine Beer and Mix Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance Supplies LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As at April 30, 1984 ASSETS TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS: Land Land Improvements Buildings Furniture and Fixtures Leasehold Improvements Less allowance for Depreciation and Amortization CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll Due to Other Funds SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets Unappropriated $ 22,552.28 729,769.27 306,735.14 3,035.55 $1,062,092.24 444,884.35 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 40,829.76 3,800.00 $ 334,365.06 299,300.57 75,560.14 $ 44,629.76 39,786.69 415,000.00 709,225.77 $ 2,910.00 400.00 3,310.00 $1,211,952.22 $ 233,784.60 617,207.89 850,992.49 $2,062,944.71 $ 850,992.49 1,034,304.30 $ 154,092.46 7,385.82 $ 161,478.28 16,169.64 $ 177,647.92 .1,885,296.79 $2,062,944.71 LIQUOR DISPENSAi. rUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA Four Months Ending April 30, 1984 and April 30, 1983 Tncrease- 50th Street Yorkdale 1984 Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale lqR ,,Grandview Total Decrease* SALES: 289,642.25 487,106 50 237,950.02 438,310 14 703,196.69 1,209,065.04 209,893.84 286,156.21 303,342.64 531,557.64 256,136.67 425,750.71 769,373.15 1,243,464.56 66,176.46* 34,399.52* 1,125.37* Liquor $ 154,727.81 $ 316,548.45 $ 283,585.03 $ 754,861.29 $ 169,645.97 $ 292,696.47 $ 292,696.47 $ 802,518.06 $ 47,656.77* Wine 105,569.69 192,739.00 160,197.75 458,506.44 108,328.22 167,268.73 167,268.73 480,307.41 21,800.97* Beer 66,327.13 133,041.06 113,379.82 312,748.01 70,010,64 130,750.71 106,643.82 307,405.17 5,342.84 Mix and Miscellaneous 4,180 97 10,271 22 8,721.24 23,173.43 4,410.43 9,606.09 8,156.06 22,172.58 1,000.85 $ 330,805.60 $ 652,599.73 $ 565,883.84 $1,549,289.17 $ 352,395.26 $ 685,242.88 $ 574,765.08 $1,612,403.22 $ 639114.05* Less bottle refunds 8,275 15 20,175 09 18,088 90 46,539 14 9,090 44 21,920 24 19,796.50 50,807.18 4,268.04* NET SALES $ 322,530.45 $ 632,424.64 $ 5479794.94 $1,502,750.03 $ 343,304.82 $ 6639322.64 $ 5549968.58 $1,561,596.04 $ 58,846.01* COST OF SALES: Inventory -January 1175,604.42 Purchases 283,648 40 289,642.25 487,106 50 237,950.02 438,310 14 703,196.69 1,209,065.04 209,893.84 286,156.21 303,342.64 531,557.64 256,136.67 425,750.71 769,373.15 1,243,464.56 66,176.46* 34,399.52* 1,125.37* $ Inventory Apr. 30 459,252.82 205,429 79 $ 776,748.75 267,006 70 $ 676,260.16 236,789 28 $1,912,261.73 709,225 77 $ 496,050.05 212,472.73 $ 834;900.28 280,786.19 $ 681,887.38 218,916.74 $2,012,837.71 712,175.66 $100,575.98* 2,949.89* Income on investments $ 253,823.03 $ 509,742.05 $ 439,470.88 $1,203,035.96 $ 283,577.32 $ 5549114.09 $ 462,970.64 $1,300,662.05 $ 97,626.09* 200.28 GROSS PRO AT 68,707.42 $ 122,682.59 $ 108,324.06 $ 299,714.07 $ 59,727.50 $ 109,208.55 $ 91,997.94 $ 260,933.99 $ 38,780.08 $ 6,947.92 OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling Overhead Administrative TOTAL OPERATI EXPENSES NET OPERATING $ PROFIT OTHER INCOME: 21,842.23 15,515.65 24.855.50 39,705.37 24,163,13 31,165.01 31,247.28 14,358.50 26,281.12 92,794.99 54,037.28 82,301.63 62,213.49 $ 95,033.51 $ 71,886.90 $ 229,133.90 6,493.99 $ 27,649.08 $ 36,437.16 $ 70,580.17 $ 18,466.96 11,887.89 21,604.20 34,303.20 22,464.76 29,180.87 28,639.40 81,409.56 11,385.43 13,758.26 48;110.91 5,926.37 23,015.63 73,800.70 8,500.93 51,959.05 $ 85,948.85 $ 651,413.29 2039321.17 1 $ 25,812.73 7,768.45 $ 23,259.72 $ 26,584.65 $ 57,612.82 $ 12,967.35 Cash Discount 4,273.99 6-,645,07 6,139.36 17,058.42 4,271.81 7.862.54 6,049.44 18,183.79 1,125.37* Cash over or under 14.03* 64.65* 23.33 55.35* 16.14* 129.39* 104.96 40.57* 14.73* Income on investments -0- 15.25 15.13 -0- -0- 13.02 Operating profit Other income -0- -0- Other 200.28 367.50 350.20 917.98 146.48 204.36 153.48 504.32 413.66 $ 4,460.24 $ 6,947.92 $ 6,512,89 $ 17,921.05 $ 4,402.15 $ 7,937.51 $ 6,307,88 $ 18 ,647.54 $ 726.49* N ET$INCOM E$ 10,954 17 $ 34,597 00 $ 42,950 05 $ 88,501 22 $ 12,170.60 $ 31,197.23 $ 32,892.53::$ 76,260.36::::: $:12,240.86 PERCENT TO NET SALES: Gross profit ° 21.30/ 19.40/ 19.77/ 19.94% 17.40% 16.46% 16.58% 16.71% Operating expenses 19.29 15.03 13.12 15.25 15.13 12.96 11.79 13.02 Operating profit Other income 2.01% 1.39 4.37% 1.10 6.65% 1.19 4.69% 1.19 2.27% 1.28 3.50% 1.20 " 4.79% 1.14 3.69% 1.19 NET INCOME 3.40% 5.47% 7.84% 5.88% 3.55% 4.70% 5.93% 4.88% CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand Deposits Working Fund Contracts Receivable Loan To Other Funds Inventory: Liquor Wine Beer and Mix Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance Supplies FIXED ASSETS: Land Land Improvements Buildings Furniture and Fixtures Leasehold Improvements Less allowance for Depreciation and Amortization CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll Due To Other Funds SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets Unappropriated LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As at May 31, 1984 ASSETS $ 115,831 ".09 3,800.00 $ 119,631.09 39,786.69 415,000.00 $ 316,592.88 282,853.83 92,641.77 692,088.48 $ 1,360.00 400.00 1,760.00 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS $1,268,266.26 $ 233,784.60 $ 22,766.06 729,769.27 306,735.14 3,035.55 $1,062,306.02 448,894.35 613,411.67 847,196.27 TOTAL ASSETS $2,115,462.53 LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES $ 167,966.87 15,025.25 $ 182,992.12 16,169.64 $ 199,161.76 $ 847,196.27 1,691,104.50 1,916,300.77 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,115,462.53 i LIQUOR DISPENSA,.. FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA Five Months Ending May 31, 1984 and May 31, 1983 Increase- _ 19A4 1983 Decrease* 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total SALES: 87,870.78 $ 156,292.99 $ 140,542.51 $ 384,706.28 $ 76,155.45 $ 137,947.89 $ 118,524.57 $ 332,627.91 Liquor $ 201,060.90 $ 405,114.57 $ 366,256.31 $ 972,431.78 $ 217,928.01 $. 432,077.47 $ 378,713.36 $1,028,718.84 $ 56,237.06* Wine 132,247.30 Other income 1.42 241,644.45 Selling 203,751.62 577,643.37 50,369.02 135,823.15 40,517.44 254,187.30 5.87% 211,459.24 601,469.69 23,826.32* Beer 88,522.76 3.99% 174,740.17 152,941.79 416,204.72 18,555.06 92,104.32 27,584.15 171,833.15 17,782.23 143,659.27 407,596.74- 8,607.98 Mix and Miscellaneous 5,674.82 13,440.54 11,712.46 30,827.82 5,800.77 31,626.91 12 ;580.94 40,107.23 11 ;051:25 29,432.96 1,394.86 $ 427,505.78 $ 834,939.73 $ 734,662.18 $1,997,107.69 $ 451,656.25 $ 870,678.86. $_ 744,883.12_ $2,067,218,23 _... $ 70,110.54* Less bottle refunds 10,795.30 $ 26,241.08 $ 23,377.08 60,413.46 90,860.09 11,765.08 277,026.66 28; 044.86 11 ;200.31 25;745.13 65,555.07 5,141.61* NET SALES $ 416,710.48 $ 808,698.65 $ 711,285.10 $1,936,694.23 $ 439,891.17 $ 842,634.00 $ 719,137.99 $2,001,663.16 $ 64,968.93* COST OF SALES: 38,232.59 $ 48,895.41 $ 96,479.31 $ 5,149.03 $ 22,787.74 $ 27,664.48 $ 55,601.25 $ 40,873.06 Inventory - January 1 175,604.42 289,642.25 237,950.02 703,196.69 209,893.84 303,342.64 256,136.67 769,373.15 66,176.46* Purchases 364,275.25 OTHER INCOME: 625,303.44 551,301.05 1,540,879.74 363,728.24 704,444.98 558 9530.40 1,6261703.62 85,823.88* $ 539,879.67 $ 914,945.69 $ 789,251.07 $292449076.43 $ 573,622.08 $19007, 787.62 - $ 814, 667.07 $2,396,076.77 - $152,000.34* InventorVay 31 2119039.97 8,018.44 262,540.03 23,801.65 218,508.48 6929088.48 Cash over or under 209,886.36 303,101.51 214 ;053.65 - 727,041.52 - 34;953.04* $ 328,839.70 $ 6529405.55 $ 570,742.59 $1,551,987.95 $ 363,735.72 $ 704 ;686.11 $ 600,613.42 $1, 669 ;035.25 $117 ;047.30* GROSS PROFIT 87,870.78 $ 156,292.99 $ 140,542.51 $ 384,706.28 $ 76,155.45 $ 137,947.89 $ 118,524.57 $ 332,627.91 $ 52,078.37 OPERATING EXPENSES: 12.88 14.88 16.14 13.67 12.63 13.84 Operating profit 2.24% 4.73% 6.88% 4.98% 1.17% 2.70% 3.85% 2.78% Other income 1.42 1.14 Selling 28,337.50 1.25 50,369.02 1.16 40,517.44 119,223.96 5.87% 27,091.73 6.17% 49,959.51 3.93% 42,461.30 3.99% 119,512.54 288.58* Overhead 18,555.06 27,584.15 17,782.23 63,921.44 14,940.05 26,265.00 17,462.54 58,667.59 Administrative 31,626.91 40,107.23 33,347.43 105,081.57 28,974.64 38,935.64 30,936.25 98,846 53 6,235.04 TOTAL OPERATI G EXPENSES � 78,519.47 $ 118,060.40 $ 91,647.10 $ 288,226.97 $ 71,006.42 $ 115,160.15 $ 90,860.09 $ 277,026.66 $ 11 ;200.31 NET OPERATING$ 9,351.31 $ 38,232.59 $ 48,895.41 $ 96,479.31 $ 5,149.03 $ 22,787.74 $ 27,664.48 $ 55,601.25 $ 40,873.06 PROFIT OTHER INCOME: Cash Discount 5,309.32 8,270.43 7,383.59 20,963.34 5,354.98 10,428.23 8,018.44 23,801.65 2,833.31* Cash over or under 28.84* 85.51* 42.81 71.54* 15.87* 264.90* 116.72 164.05* 92.51 Income on investments -0- -0- -0- - -0- -0- Other 621.14 1,010.24 502.71 2,134.09 165.82 225.80 174.95- 566.57 1 1567.52 $ 5,901.62 $ 9,195.16 $ 7,929.11 $ 23,025.89 $ 5,504.93 $ 10;389.13 $ 8; 310.11 $ 24,204 17 $ 1,178.28* NET INCOM E$ 15,252.93 $ 47,427.75 $ 56,824.52 $ 119,505.20 $ 10,653.96 $ 33,176.87 $ 35,974.59 $ .. ... .... 79;805.42::: ... . . $ 39.699.78 PERCENT TO NET SALES: Gross profit 21.08% 19.33% 19.76% 19.86% 17.31% 16.37% 16.48% 16.62% Operating expenses 18.84 14.60 12.88 14.88 16.14 13.67 12.63 13.84 Operating profit 2.24% 4.73% 6.88% 4.98% 1.17% 2.70% 3.85% 2.78% Other income 1.42 1.14 1.11 1.19 1.25 1.23 1.16 1.21 NET INCOME 3.66% 5.87% 7.99% 6.17% 2.42% 3.93% 5.01% 3.99% RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON FRANCE AVENUE FROM W. 70TH STREET TO SOUTH CITY LIMITS IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, Hennepin County has planned the improvement of CSAH 17 (France Avenue) from W. 77th Street to W. 80th Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, approval of the proposed construction project must there- fore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions, and WHEREAS,- the extent of these restrictions that would be necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction has been determined; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY RESOLVED, that the City of Edina shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of CSAH 17 (France Avenue) from W. 70th Street to the South City Limits at all times. ADOPTED this 2nd day of July, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for -the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 2, 1984, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 12th day of July, 1984. City Clerk 1984 , / OF F.DIKA CHECK 1,_oISTFR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEEM DESCRIPTION 21 184009 C6/25/84 63.67 ASTLEFORD EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS J 63.60 I3 -- ALTERNATOR ff #f ## GEN SUPPLIES - - - -- G - -- - -- 1�, - - -- t iu_, - - 184013 - - - 06/25rg4 - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1841'13 06/25/94 ALTERNATOR 184013 C6125/84 i - -- 184013 06/25/8- - Ile REBUILD -- 184013 U6/26/84 24.95- - - -- AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C 24.95 * C7 -02 -8. PAGE 1 1 ACCOUNT NO* INV. p P.O. 4 MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2 i J - -- - - -- -- ----- - - - - -- - -- rrf -CKS 7 CCNT REAPIRS 10= 4248 = 560 =56 9 ,o i- ,t ,2 - - - - -- 44.04 - - -_ - -- ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES - - - -- -- -10- 4504 - 301 -3Q - - - -- - -- 1�, 35.50 ALTERKATCP REBUILD P. =PAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16 ' 83.66 ALTERNATOR R_8UIL0 TOOLS 10 -45ED- 301 -30 BURY 8 - - -- - -- 32:70--- - - - - -- ALTERNATOR REBUILD -- PARTS- - - - - -- 10= 4620 = 560- 56 - - - -- -- - - -- --- - -;,7I 32.7C ATOR ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 228.60 • BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 184041 -- 184-017 - -- -- 06/25784 - - -- -- 104.- 00 - - -- ALLIrD- PLASTIC -S- - �20 104.00 * i.l _ti ff#• ___ __... _____._ _ ___ .. _1 * ** -CKS i2j - - GEN SUPPLIES - 3 '6 - 27II I _.,2F* ** -CKS urr #. 184026 06/25/84 93.02 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 788 -78 184041 06/27/84 536.60 BURY R CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 184U41 06/26/84 239.90 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP EURY 8 CARLSON -INC ' 271 fffrff 3,P70.05 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 184041 06/26/84 * ** -CKS I29 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP T84041 -- �67Z7/p�- - 90 - -- BURY- g- CARLSON- -INC ---- BLACKTOP -- 184031 C'/27/84 6.40 EERTFLSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 44C -44 Igo 184031 66/26/84 90.64 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510- 51';'� „` 184031 --- - 06/25/x+4 - - - -- - 33:0 -8 -BE RTELSON BROS INC - - - -- OFFICE SUPPLJIES — 10- 4516 = 510 = -51- - - - - - -- - - -- - J2 184031 C6/25/84 131 *03 BERTFLSON BROS INC CFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 510 -51 l�" ,, 184031 `J6/26/84 -._ 97.64 -_. —. -3..51 -- BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 20- 4516 - 600 -60 ,124 341 ---- - - - - -- - -- - ------ - - - r 79- _ urr #. 184041 06/27/84 536.60 BURY R CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 184U41 06/26/84 239.90 BURY 8 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP EURY 8 CARLSON -INC BLACKTOP 184041 06127184 3,P70.05 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 184041 06/26/84 4.809.95 BURY B CARLSON INC BLACKTOP T84041 -- �67Z7/p�- - 90 - -- BURY- g- CARLSON- -INC ---- BLACKTOP -- 10 9257.00 184044 06/25/84 143.34 1-43-03-4 BILL BOYER FORD - REPAIR PARTS f *fkf• 184046 06/26784 117.91 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV -- 117.91 * -- - - - -- — -- - *rrr *f - -- - - -- -- -- - i*f-CKS I, 10 -4504- 345 -30 I' 10 -45 24- 301- 30 _.__ —_10- 4524 - 361- 30 - - - -- -- - - -- ------ - - - >,I 10- 45 24- 314- 30 10- 4524 - 314 -30 - - - - -30 =4524- 783 =78 ;al _ J! - * *• -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 G' 9 r.i • *+ -CKS 171 1�1 10- 2149 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS I74I 1984 CITY OF TOINA CHECK REGISTER 07-02-84 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. COTE AMOUNT VF:NDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. MESSAGE 0 3 134048 06/25194 13.05 ERISSMAN KENNEDY INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 4 --184-C48- 36/25/84 -ERISSMAN KENNEOY INC GEN -SUPPLIES---'- ___10._4504__520-52_____ 129.01 lk lk -i 14 ***-CKS Al 0 1?4050 C6/25f84 1 9124.00 FUSSINESS MACHIRES SERV CCNT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 o l :01 *•• -CKS io rl 194069 06/26194 71050 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 684 -68 184060 06125/84 62.33 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66 & —ifz4:0-60 _ 9 _6i26194 -59. °0 AMBASSADOR -SAUSAGE-- CONCESSIONS - -- ________28_4624 04-10 ill 193.63 184370 06/25/84 73.72. CARLSON THERMO CORRECTION 20 -4504- 646 -64 ---184070 06?25?84 ?3.-!2 -CARLSON THERMO GEN supOL!ES---------'-'--20-4-504-646-64 184070 C6/25/94 73.72 CAFLSCN TPER�O GEN SUPPLIES 20-4504-646-64 184070 06/25/94 48.67 CARLSON THERMO REPAIR PARTS 20-4540-646-64 124 --15.30-- __C KRL-S-ON-T-HE R MO ------ ---REP A I R_ VA —20 =4540= 646 -b4- 137.69 184072 06/25/84 56.70 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10-4210-140-14 ••• -CKS 184074 06/26/84 305.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERY 10- 4278 - 470 -47 371 305.00 3n ff•aa• + ++ -CKS a� 184078 06/25/94 .65 COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 3E5.65 4-1 184092 06125/94 5.25 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-520-52 __ __i84082 _ __06?2?/84 CONWAY FIRE - 9 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 1.71 1840P2 06/25/84 1:75 CCRWAY FIRE 9 SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 10-45C4-482-48 no 184082 06/25/84 18*00 CONWAY FIRE 9 SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 .7 5_____C_ONWNY'__FI RE AF-ETY GEN- SUPPLIES- 10 =4504-54 0- 54--- so 184082 06/25/84 32.00 CONWAY FIRE 9 SAFETY GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-540-54 129.75 #60 �3 *&• -CKS 7, 134087 - - - - -- 06727/84 - - -- l 13- 5 0_____CU RTI N-MAT H__S C I ---'-- -LAB- FEES - -- -- 10v-3318= 000 -00 12 184097 06/26f84 149.66 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-482-48 -- - 433 __3 4---- _.____ `1984 # # #ff -- TRUCKS---- — " - -- -10 -4910- 301 -30 488.40 PERIT 5784 - -- ; �0 184125 06127/84 ` 2 P 184125 Y OF EDINA - -MERIT CHECK ,ISTER - __U6/25/c47 -- 07 -02 -, PAGE 3 PERIT 1P4125 06/27/P4 CHECK NC. CATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE -- «� 4- 184087 06/26/84 40.17 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 39375. ?4 • 4C 184126 -'� - I4 -- - -- - -- -- - - -- - ._..._303.33 -- -- - - -- - ---- .... -- - - - -- - -- -- - - - - - - - I. �I • e rr # #rf 4iw5 -.50 - - - - -- - -- — --- - - - - -- -- #f# -CKS ' 7 184090 —" -- 06/25184 - - -- -- - -- 67:74— CERT POWt:R TRAIN — - -- PEPAIR -PARTS -------- - - -10= 4540 - 560 =56— - - - - -- — —''o 1� 1P4090 06/25/84 39#83 CEPT PCWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 I1. - a 107.57 r ,o „ 184091 U6/27/24 16.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 23 -4258- 611 -61 I" "• ,z 184091 06/27/84 173.44 CITY CF EDINA WATER 27- 4258 - 661 -66 - - -- 184091 ----- C6/27/84 - - - - -- 33.00 - - - -- C'TY OF-- E!]INA. WATER -- - - -- — -" _2 8- 4258 - 708= 70 -- -- rl 184091 06/27/84 153.40 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50- 4258 - 841 -84 =• 376.34 • , CIa►IJ if fill ### —CKS !7� 1 C -- 184099 - - -- 0!5/25184 - - - -- - - - 20.69------- CUSHMQN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662- 66 - - -- - -- - - �201 184099 06/25/P4 72.89 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 662 -66 1.,1• .,� 93.58 * 'I �I..I r#►l #r ••+ —C KS • 1841-12 - 06/77/84 - - -- - 107.98 - CAYTOAS - -- - -- ____GEN SUPPLIES - - - -- -- 26= 45lY4- 684 -68 -- , :7I 107. ?8 • ?:I• -.n it #f #• •# #—CKS _ .ao 184114 C6/26184 17.66 CELEGARD TOCL CC TOOL 10- 4580- 560 -56 ' Sil -- 184114 -- - 06/26/p4----- - - - - -- - -16.80 OELEGARD -- TOOL CO— " " - - - "— TOOL - -- ---- - - -10= 4580 - 560 -56— 41 rI 184114 06/26/P4 71.50 DELEGARD TOOL CO TOOL 20 -4580- 646 -64 '4_• 105.96 + -- - 433 __3 4---- _.____ Il # # #ff -- TRUCKS---- — " - -- -10 -4910- 301 -30 488.40 PERIT 5784 - -- ; �0 184125 06127/84 SUPPLY TRASH CANS 184125 06/25/84 - -MERIT SUPPLY - - -1� 41 25- - __U6/25/c47 -- �41 PERIT 1P4125 06/27/P4 26- 1300 - 000 -OG 42 184125 06/26/84 GEN SUPPLIES - - -- 184125 -- •44 4- 194125 06/25/!'4 • 47 184126 06/27/84 39375. ?4 • 4C 184126 06127/94 -- - 433 __3 4---- _.____ _PERIT— SUPPLY - - -- -- TRUCKS---- — " - -- -10 -4910- 301 -30 488.40 PERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPJLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 897.14 PEP.IT SUPPLY TRASH CANS 20- 4602- 644 -64 - -MERIT SUPPLY - - - - -- TRUCKS '— —' -- --- -' -20- 4910 - 646 -64 -- -- - 164.00 PERIT SUPPLY CCNSTRUCTICN 26- 1300 - 000 -OG 76.30 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 661 -66 - — 450.00 - " - -- — PER IT- SUPPLY - — - CLEAN SUPPLIES 28- 4512- 708 -70 — 433.33 MERIT SUPPLY TRUCKS 40- 4910 - 801 -80 39375. ?4 • 456.75 CAVIS EUGENE WEED INSP 60- 4100 - 985 -90 28.75 CAVIS EUGENE MILEAGE 60 -4208- 985 -90 4iw5 -.50 - - - - -- - -- — --- - - - - -- -- 184128 06/27/84 22.80 DAIRY HOME 22.80 • CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 704 -70 • "I �I. ^' 1 n7 #ff- CKS - -- - - 721 I,. •r# —CKS I „�• 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -02 -84 PAGE 4 �I CYECK NC. DATE APOU�7 VENOC,P ITEM DESCRIPTION. ACCOUNT N0. INY. p P.O. A PESSAGE f� _1= 1 =l -- 184143 66/26/84 152.71 ENRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 z? j 184143 06/25/84 204.91 ENRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS - _. -27- 4624- 664 -66 �1 ?57.F2 • I _. _.. - - -- - - - -_ - -- - - -- -- -- - - - -- - -- fff -CKS n � 0 -- 184146 06725/84 40.20 GP!:iN_ACRES SPKL CONT_REPAIRS 20- 4248 - 646 -64 - _ _ "194146 061251P4 47.75 - GREEN 'ACRES SPKL CCNT REPAIRS -- -- - -20 -4248- 646 -64 - 87.95 < ***—CPS Itel 741 r _ - -- 184148 -" 06/27/84 - - 13.76 -- _- -. - - -- ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY -ELVIN GEN SUPPLIES '- 10- 4504- 440 -44 18414,9" 76127/94 5600 SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES__ -._ 29- 4504 = 720 -72 - -- -- - ; o 69.96 + , - - - -- 184149 -- -- - 76/26/84 - 13.09 - " - - - -" EG-BEkG- GrJLF- CARTS - " -_ - - "- REPAIR PARTS - - - -- 27= 4540 - 662 -66 -- - - - ' 184149 06/26/84 41.30 EGEBERG GOLF CARTS REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 671 -66 I ,1 194149 -- [6725184 13.63 E'EBERG GOLF CARTS REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 671 -66 - - - 6q t - - - -- - Qn . —_ . f l a t•• fta CKS 184154 76/26/94 11,9.50 JOE r LIAS kEDCENTER COV 1D -4156- 510 -51 71 184154 06126/94 456.75 JCE ELIAS SALARY 27- 4100- 663 -66 ,; - 575.2 - - -- - -- - -- - - ]J -- faff fl -- - — -- - - -- fff —CKS I 184162 06/25/94 15.60 FCWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 662 -66 '_l_ - -_ -_._ 15.60 • •JS lltffa ffa -CKS a•I ­1 4164 - " - 067257,94 21.48 --- 21 .48 • - -- FREEWAY DODGE -IBC - REPAIR PARTS-----------------10-.-4540-560-56 - - - --- - - - --- - ---- -- --- - - -- -- -- :ft -CKS a,� ten, 1841 d1 06/27/84 136.00 GENERAL SPORTS UNIFORM ALLOkENCE 10- 4266- 421 -42 nl -- - - - -- -- - -'- - -- - - - - - - - -- 136.0C- + - - --- - - ... -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- — •45I _ fff-[KS . 184183 U6/26184 47.54 GIVENS INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 4L 47.54 • • �s,i f•fraa aff— CKS 134191 -06125134- -` — -- -- 19.02- - - GOLF PROPERTIES INC REPAIR PARTS - -- -27- 4540 - 671 -66 - 53 19.02 + '0 74 z� 1841 -92 - -- --- 06-R77- 8- 4-- - - - - -- 2.795.00 --- WAL ?��- GOStAFS07J--- `�ERVICE� — _— _10- 4100=Z20 -22 -- - - - - -- _ .. 1, •� 2 •798.00 -t U . 1984 if OF ECINA CHECK ISTER C7-02-t 'JAGE 5 1 1,p CHECK NO. OATS AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NOo INV. 0--PoOo 4_ MESSAGE _____ 3 KS 4i 184194 C6/27/F4 5.39 GENERAL COMMUN'ICATNS RADIO SERVICES 10-4294-440-44 184194 C6/27/84 2.51) GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIC SERVICES 10-4294-440-44 7 7 F_ 184194 06/27/84__ ---186*90 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS ST AID SUPPLIES----- ICj 4510- 440-44______ 1841 94 06/25/84 7.73 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS PARTS 10:4620:560-56 Ic a 202.52 • ••*-CKS 1 --- -184199-- __0"251?4__ ___________27.59 __C_ T -PARTS REPAIR PARTA_Sl0`-454D 560-56-- 17. 27.59 13' :1 18420-0 06/25/84 1- 100-01 ____f-r_NERAL OFFICE PROD OFFICE EQUIP 500- 50 7 18420() 06/25I84 1.275.00 GENERAL CFFICE FROG CAPITAL OUTLAY 20- 4900 - 600 -60 00 06/25/84 218.70 GENERAL OFFICE FROG CAPITAL CUTLAY 20-4900-600-6C 29593 00 REPAIR 1C-4540-560-56 184209 184209 U6/25/P4 66/25/84 80.36 33.12 GENUINE G r- N' U I N E PARTS PARTS PARTS REPAIR PARTS IC-4540-560-56 PARTS REPAIR__PARTS7-PARTS _------1D-;4540-560-56 'WJZ4 IP4209 06/26f84 3.96 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4620-560-56 184209 06/25/84 22.42- GENUINE PARTS CREDIT 10-4620-560-56 18420 16.72 " - - -" GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4620-560-56 40 184209 06/26/84 19.40 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4620-56C-56 30 184209 C6/251?4 9.40 G ?i U I h E PARTS PARTS 10-4620-560-56 160.42 • ,z iriarr *—c i(s 4i 184213 06/25/84 240.00 LrFOY H LIBBY CONT SERY 30- 4200- 780 -78 240.00 ***-CPS --184220 - 60 _____H_A"ED_LUMBrR CO- GEN SUPPLIES 783-78-- 31.60 �2 ***—CPS 4'j 184238 06/26184 24-00 NM H McCoy GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-301-30 - 24. -cl G' 17 afitfi **—C S - 184244 06/26184 191.29 FAYDEN MURPHY GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-345-30 CrIg 191.29 3 ***—Cps 14 721 1 8 . ___H'YT_GA_ARF0S7INt__'_ _F 5 -------CON T -REP A lKS-­-20= 4248 = 646 -64 - -- - 118.85 ,�7 1984 CITY OF cozw CHECK NO. DATE vnnuwT xcmonn cFscx ncszorcn I7cw ococnzpzzom 07~02~84 p^sc a AC COUNT-- NO.- Imx" w p.o° w pcsowmc )^ 7 346. 70 ° ° ~ � °cws |' -- ~ 184253 ouma/x* 26.50 *onp*Oc, oxomroo romr ncpxznn 10~*248~560~56 .` | "| 184278 26"50 -�__-__. 9. ?3 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 26:4 5 04- 689- 68 | 120 184278 06f25/?4 ° �.� 8x�av'-�- �a/�sv8*------' -�n*.��-----��nM . tnnpn*xrzcu —'----cnLzp-pcNm[--- .1 v u *zu r �ovzs � �pv.00 �pr noxpoozow �ouzp ncwx� 10~42 26~510-51 `^ / .� -----'-' �— ----------�� avn.»4 -- - ----- -- ----------- ------- --'---------�---�--'--------- ---' `! '" 26-4 6 04- 684- 6 8 ' - - ~ ***-CPS ;�----19 42 rY-- -o6�2rve^-'---------345 .70 - — CANuumPo,wr,wG------pw,ur,mn-- 26-4 6 24- 684- 68 7 346. 70 184278 06/27/34 9. ?3 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 26:4 5 04- 689- 68 120 184278 06f25/?4 30.78 JERRYS FOODS CLEAN SUPPLIES 26-4512-684-68 184278 06/27/E4 10.23 JERRYS FOODS LUMBER 26-4 6 04- 684- 6 8 ' 2- 184278 C6/27/84 6.?5 JEPRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 26-4 6 24- 684- 68 Zn --18 4278- U612778C- � ` � �4w 184290 C6125/84 102.1`0 TOP QUALITY FOODS CONCESSIONS 27-4624-664-66 184290 L) 6 26 18 4 101.50 TOP QUALITY FOODS CONCESSINS 27-4624-664-66 184292 06/27/84 12 Q 31 .00 hARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10-4 2 60- 510- 51 W4 14:003.00 194304 06/25/E4 124.20 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 20-46C4-646-64 to 184304 L6127f84 16.17 KNOX LUMBER CG GEN SUPPLIES 28:4 5 04: 70 8- 7 0 395 :91 ^ " ` �� ----'---� -- ----- --- - � | ' 1984 Y OF EDINA CHM SISTER 07-02- PAGE 7 ITEM -DESCRIPTION ------ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. I MESSAGE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-328-3G PARATS 10-4620-560-56 GEN SUPPLIES ----------20-4504-646-64— GEN, SUPPLIES 20-4504-646-64 GEN SUPPLIES 28-4504-708-70 BILLING BILLING CCRRECTrcN---' BILLING BILLING BILLING BILLING BILLING B 1 L L I N G BILLING 8 ILL ING BILLING REPAIR PARTS Sal -184331 -06/25/P4- -----255.00 LAFASS ' CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 184331 06/25/84 255.00- LAHASS CCRPCRATICN CCNT REPAIRS 164331 06/25/94 255.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 194336 06/27/84 184342 06/26/14 184344 06/27/94 2 '3Al A, III 55 �3 5 184346 06/25/84 l5]1 63.90 LANCE CONCESSIONS 63.90 ***—CI(S �'c ***—CNS 10-4228-160-16 10- 4228 -160 -1 6 10-4228-160-16 10-4230-16C-16 10- 4233 - 200 -20 CHECK NO. CATE AMOUNT VENDOR 10- 49r-0- 5C2 -50 -------3a-4232 -780-78- 40-42 '-22:%3CO-8C 50-4233-820-82 184317 J6/25/84 I80.29 LAwSON PRODUCTS 20-4540-646-64 184317 06/25/84 333.25 LAWSON PRODUCTS 10-4248-560-56 184317 -06 /25/84- 321- 93 ------ - LAWSON- PRODUCTS 4w 27-4624-664-66 184317 C6/25/,Q4 82:94 LA6SON PRODUCTS 184317 06/25/84 835.07 L A ii"S ON PRODUCTS _s 1,752-.58- 184324 '26/25/84 587.53 LOGIS IF4324 C6f25/P-4 813.76 LOGIS - 1P4324 C610251P4 587,53- t c c I S • 184324 06/25/94 19531 .66 L 0 G I S 184324 06/25/84 1046.11 LOGIS - -- -1843 2 4 --- - C6/Z5/84 --1 117 34-------- 184324 16/25/84 2:32C:CO tcc-IS 1F432 06/25184 LOCIS ,21 - 1,.4324 C-6/25/94 �29000.7 ;57. '73 LCCIS - •c3 184324 G6/25/84 557.73 LOGIS 184324 06/25184 257.21 LOGIS 0,5/257F-4 ------ 184324 060`25/F4 257*21 LCCIS 7 12,415.97 194325 06/25/84 17.23 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT 31 17.23 C i Izi 33 07-02- PAGE 7 ITEM -DESCRIPTION ------ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. I MESSAGE GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-328-3G PARATS 10-4620-560-56 GEN SUPPLIES ----------20-4504-646-64— GEN, SUPPLIES 20-4504-646-64 GEN SUPPLIES 28-4504-708-70 BILLING BILLING CCRRECTrcN---' BILLING BILLING BILLING BILLING BILLING B 1 L L I N G BILLING 8 ILL ING BILLING REPAIR PARTS Sal -184331 -06/25/P4- -----255.00 LAFASS ' CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 184331 06/25/84 255.00- LAHASS CCRPCRATICN CCNT REPAIRS 164331 06/25/94 255.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 194336 06/27/84 184342 06/26/14 184344 06/27/94 2 '3Al A, III 55 �3 5 184346 06/25/84 l5]1 63.90 LANCE CONCESSIONS 63.90 ***—CI(S �'c ***—CNS 10-4228-160-16 10- 4228 -160 -1 6 10-4228-160-16 10-4230-16C-16 10- 4233 - 200 -20 - - -10- 4233- 42C -42 10-49JO-300-30 10- 49r-0- 5C2 -50 -------3a-4232 -780-78- 40-42 '-22:%3CO-8C 50-4233-820-82 - - -50- 4233- 84C -84 50-4233-86C-86 20-4540-646-64 Ar C K 4 ----10-4248-560-56 10-4248-560-56 10-4248-560-56 **-C l(S 27-4624-664-66 -137.15 MAC —(TUUEN--EQUIP INC REPAIR 56 137.15 * 129.77 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10-4510-440-44 128.77 -* - - -- - - - -- - -- 3,7P6.75 MET N WASTE C L COMM BLDG PERMITS 10-3095-000-00 ***—CNS I T **—CI(S ***—CPS FL i_ A 1984 CITY OF EOIr\A CHECK kC. GATE 2 a f f f f f f _IS 184350 - 66/25/84 a I- - -- - - 4 e �I *rrf*R CHECK REGISTER AMOUAT VENDOR 3,726.75 07 -02 -84 PAGE 8 '` ITEM DESCFIPTION — _ ACCOUNT NO. INV. # F.G. 4 MESSAGE -- - _� t zl I� Iv ***-CPS 5 21.15 MILLER DAVIS CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 200 -20 ! - - 21:15 . - - -- - - �tt•� 184363- - - - -- 06/25/x,4. ___._ ..__ __ 0I t 4A`I - ***fff IaA� 184370 u _ 184370 „� 184370 aI <al 194370 49 51 184381 ,A 194391 31.46 MONARCH MARNI�G 31.46 06/25/84 _ . — _ . _ . . . .... . ..... . .. _ .__ ..—.... _ _ . . _ . _ ... - . ___ — _ _ ' . _. _. - _ _ f * • k f A • • • -CPS i: • 184353 06/25 18 4 70 .40 M _ - MILAN - TORO - - 184359 06/25/34 _. t -1 184353 06/25/F4 52.45 MINNcSOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -3J "! `,I i- — 1 °4353 -- C6 /25 /F4 -_- -- 49.70 PTNN_SOT4 GLOVE _ WELDING SUPPLIES - INC -- 1R4353 06126/84 35.90 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 X11! 20- 4900 - 600 -60!/ - - - 184359 - 20x.45 • ` ;:.I REPAIR PARTS 184359 I a,! 184363- - - - -- 06/25/x,4. ___._ ..__ __ 0I t 4A`I - ***fff IaA� 184370 u _ 184370 „� 184370 aI <al 194370 49 51 184381 ,A 194391 31.46 MONARCH MARNI�G 31.46 06/25/84 11.00 MICLAND PRCDUCTS ` 17 ***-Cps _ e f * • k f A MIDLAND PRODUCTS °I 184359 ❑6 125 78 4 - -- 1 :94 - - -_ -- - MILAN - TORO - - 184359 06/25/34 _. ;., 184359 X6/25/ ?4 2.^. -- - 184359 -- - _06%25%84 -_._- - `,I hlNl TORO 184359 G6/25/94 - za j ! 184359 U6/25/P4 INC -- -- GEN SUPPLIES "---- - 184359 - 06/25184 - ` MINN TORO 184359 06/25/84 20- 4900 - 600 -60!/ - - - 184359 - 06/25/84 ` ;:.I REPAIR PARTS 184359 06/25/84 - - `:: — ?INN -TORO 184359 06/25/84 - - -27- 4540 = 662 =66 „f »� 184350 184360 X6/27/84 06/2F/84 INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 06/27/94__. - -. �3 MINN TORO 18436U J6/25/?4 184363- - - - -- 06/25/x,4. ___._ ..__ __ 0I t 4A`I - ***fff IaA� 184370 u _ 184370 „� 184370 aI <al 194370 49 51 184381 ,A 194391 31.46 MONARCH MARNI�G 31.46 06/25/84 11.00 MICLAND PRCDUCTS CC ***-Cps _ e -" — 55.30 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO 06/27/x_4 343.05 1 :94 - - -_ -- - MILAN - TORO - - INr_ - - --- --- P,EPAIR PARTS---- - - - -- 10 -4540- 560 -56 ;., 16.07 MINN TORO INC PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 - - - - - -- - - - 13.70 hlNl TORO ThC GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 j ! 125.70 - - MINN TORO INC -- -- GEN SUPPLIES "---- - - - - -- 20 -45C4- 662 -66 464. ^0 MINN TORO INC CAPITAL CUTLAY 20- 4900 - 600 -60!/ 97.91 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 - - -- - -- -7 -.65 - " — ?INN -TORO IAC--------- REPAIR -PARTS -� - - - -27- 4540 = 662 =66 - 9.07 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 43.20 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 662 -66 -- - 37.50 - -MINN TORO INC.. -- REPAIR PAFT3 - - -- - - -27- 4540 - 670 -66 _._..._.- ?6.30 FINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 670 -66 918.54 ! 30.16 hIN6ESCTA WANNER CONY REPAIRS 20-6248- 646 -64 I 760.20 M ?NNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 68.00 MINNESOTA WANNER _ CONSTRUCTION 26 -1300- 000 --?C 5.00 MINNESOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 661 -66 863.36 184363- - - - -- 06/25/x,4. ___._ ..__ __ 0I t 4A`I - ***fff IaA� 184370 u _ 184370 „� 184370 aI <al 194370 49 51 184381 ,A 194391 31.46 MONARCH MARNI�G 31.46 06/25/84 11.00 MICLAND PRCDUCTS CC 06/27/84 -" — 55.30 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO 06/27/x_4 343.05 MICLADD PRODUCTS CC 06127/84 116.17 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO - - - --- -.— 525:52 -* - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- *** -CKS g:Q PAPER- §UPPL ?ES - -- - �- -5D�4516- 860 -86 - * ** -CKS CCNT REPAIRS 20 -4248- 646 -64 Q - CJNCESSICNS -- - 26 -4624- 684 -68 CCNCESSICN 26- 4624 - 684 -68 CONCESSION 28- 4624- 704 -7C 06/26/84 79.90 STAR 8 TRIBUNE ADVERTISIKG 10- 4212 - 160 -16 06125/84 94.00 STAR 8 TRIBUNE AOVERTISINC 10- 4212 - 420 -42 -- - — 173.90- , - - - - -- -- - — 4 _4 i ***-CPS Q *•* -CKS 1984 Y OF EDINA CHECK ISTER C7 -02- 'AGE 9 t CHr_CK NC. DATE AMOUNT UENOC4 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.G. I MESSAGE 184383 06/25/84 173.90 MPLS COMP TREAS WATER 30- 4640- 783 -78 -'_ -- 1843 83 _06725/P.4 - 567 MPLS COMP TREAS - - - -- WATER - _- _ --- ---- -- ---30- 4640 - 783 -7fi _ .. - vla e 5,848.60- t _ 5 ' I v ' 9� 1P43E5 C6/27/P4 240.00 NCEWIRE ROBERT INSPECTICNS 10- 4242 - 353 -30 :' 184385 76/27/84 360.00 NCGUIP.� ROBERT INSPECTIONS 60 -1_00- 010 -18 1843.5 66/27184 360.00 MrGUIRE ROB_P. INSPECTIONS 60 -13 DO- 011 -18 960.00 + �• - +r►ta+ r*r -CPS 1Fl— 184413 - C6/26/84 - - - - -- 217.80 - NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES___ - -- -10 -4504- 520 -52 -. . ! 7 1.94413 ;:6/25/84 152.66 NATIONWICE PAPERS GEN SUPPIES 27- 4504- 663 -66 'I9 370.46 + ji's a - ,o rr +tar * ** -CKS .7 184417- C6/25/84- - - 434.45 CFFSEf- PRINTING PRINTING- - -- - _ 10- 4600- 420 -42 -:� 434.45 a „I • - L., • ** -CKS �L 1?i1 �7 24 184443 C6126/F4 77.50 POPMER MFS CC GEN SUPPLJIES 20- 4504- 621 -62 -- of 184443 - 06127784 -- - - -- - 153.50 POPMER MF9 CO -.,. - GEN SUPPLIES- .. - - -- - - ___20-45c4-627__62 r ' _ �_� JJ - - - -- -- - -- - - --- - -- ----- - - - - -- + CKS -- • r— - - ml 33 1114446 06/25/84 37.12 FICNEER RIM & WHEEL PARTS 10- 4620- 56C -56 " Ja� - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- - .- _3702- -* - - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - — - -- -- rtt+ra'� +•• -CKS , 'hnl 184459 06/26/14 P4.00 RITEWAY REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 184459- 06/25/114 78.25 RITEWAY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 ..�� - -1-62 ._25 -� - - -- — - -- q21 of *rt+ **-C gs .. a 184462 06/25/114 27.45 RENTAL EQUIP 9 SALES CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 353 -3G • a -I 184462 06/25/84 135.25 RENTAL 8 SALES CONTRACTED 10- 4248- 353 -30 -- 1*4462 -_- -- ^6/25/84 - - - - - - - -- 36.30- - -- -- _EQUIP - FENTAL EOUIF 8 SALES - - - -- - -- _'__'_____10_4580-353_30 C- n © 199.00 • ' �i a�i rr *rrt --------------------_-- - - - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - r *r -CKS .., 5,I 184469 06/26/84 3.21 MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 `I - _ 5. _. _ 1!34464 - - .___.-__ C6 %26%114 _ -38.36 _ROAD _ ROAD MACHINERY _ __ _ REPAIR PARTS _ -10-4 _ 540 - 560 =56 = sa 41 .57 + *rt+rr * *+ -CKS ��� 184475 06/26/F4 88.17 RUFFRIOGE JOHNSON TOOLS 10 -4530- 301 -3.r. ;•_ 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -02 -84 PAGE 10 CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0i INV. # P.O. 0 MESSAGE z 8P,..17 • ' - 30 184485 06/25/94 1,383.72 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10 -3055- 000 -00 ' c n 184485 - - - 06/25/8 -4 - - - 111.00 STATE- BLDG IN SP - - - - -SUR CHARGE TAX --- - - - -1D =3113- 000 -00 - - - -- - n 1,499.72 r 10 iz 184490 06/25/44 49.95 SHrRHTN WILLIAMS PAINT 20- 4544 - 646 -64 ,, lu- -- iaffff - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - - - - — - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - - - - - -- ***-CRS - !,a ,J 184492 06/26/94 29602 c SOUTHD'AL_ ` FORS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 184492 76/25/84 17.88 SOUTHO'ALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 " 184492 0 -6/ 25784 - "- - - -- 152.72 - - -- ___S 0 UT H DA LE F 0 R -- - - "P. ^PAIR PARTS ---10-;4 5 4 0- 5 6 0---5 6 zo 184492 06/25/84 48.46 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 505.98 + "� . `23 2q ff►.f. iff — CRS - 1845Z2 06/25/84 -- -- -- 77;68 - - - - -- SUBURBAN-- CHEVROLET- - - - - -- REPAIR PARTS -- 1G= 4540 - 560 -56 184502 06/25184 140.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET R -PAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 271 134502 J6/25184 37.24 SUBURBAN CHEVRCLET REPAIR PASTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -5.26 --- "--- $UEURP.AN CHEVROLET -- - - - - -- REPAIR -PARTS - - - " -- ----- 1(3 -4540- 560 -56" • 260.18 .•f.r. iii -CRS lkwI33 184505 06/25/84 35.75 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 ° 34 --- -- :1P4545 06/25/84----- - --. -- - -__. --66;17' -' . -._ ..- _. -SUh - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- ---- -- AOVERTISING - -- - - -- -- ... - - -10= 4210-140-14 - -- - �3, !G 101.92 • 184508 06/26/E4 14.94 ST PAUL ROOK CABLE TV 10- 2149 - 000 -00 - -- ST PIUI @OOK -- - - - - -- -GEM- SUPPLIES_______ - - 2il- 4504 - 600 -60 - - - - . •, 184508 06/27/84 30.70 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504- 6C0 -60 ' qz 184508 06/27/84 3.29 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 26 -4504- 688 -6e - -- 1845Q8 Q67Z5 /P4 - "- "--- - - - " "- Z5.d0 - - - - -- -ST PAUL- POOK - - -----------PARTS - - - - -27 -4620 - b61 -66 _ •.! 44 184508 06/25/84 25.90- ST PAUL 2QOK CORRECTION 27- 4620- 664- 6613�Y - 184508 06/25/E4 25.80 ST PAUL E00K PARTS 27- 4620- 664 -66 qF, - - 91.7.7... - - - - -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - 43 ff lfff • +• -CKS �Vs0. 184512 06125/84 50.16 S T ROBS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 s,l 50.16 + I••f -CMS 18451b 076/25/84 -- -- -7,35 - - SE71RS -- ROEBUCK -- -TOOLS -- —1Q= 4580- 301- 30-- - - - - -- — - - 184516 06/25/84 30.85 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10 -4580- 560 -56 I. r - .. - - - - - - - ..._...._.... _ . _.•. - - - -- � 1984 r OF EDIKA CHECK SISTER 07 -02 -, PAGE 11 C CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- #►# #ar * ** -CKS �e 184526 06/25/84 19900.00 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612 - 560 -56 ' ] - -1 ,900.00 - -t ------- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- - --------------------------------- _y.--- - ----- - - - - - •** - CKS 184530 06/25/?4 261.00 TEXGAS CORP GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 �� 261.00 • '�• ------ ----- - - - - -- `,;.: •f *a *r * ** -CKS "f -P� -- 184539 - 06/25/84 - -- — -- 94.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 184539 06/25/84 55.75 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PARATS 27- 4620 - 662 -66 - -- -. 149.75 + 2J.4 C Ks :-,' 06125/94 - - -- -37 -90 __.YAUGHNS - - -GEN SUPPLIES - -- -- 20- 4504 - 646 -64 4' 37.90 • z° <<j---- 1845b5 - - -- -- C6726/84---- - - - -- -- -12:34 - -- VIKfNG TNJOS7RL CTR - -- --GEN SUPPLIES -- - - -- -20= 4504 = 624 -62 - -- •; c. 12.34 * I ,B * *• -CKS • -�I30 184571 96125184 92.94 A g A BATTERY PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 -- -- -- ---- - - - --- - - - 33I •*f *•r _ _ •** -_CKS ^a �3'I 184582 66/25/94 615.45 CORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 27- 4612 - 662 -66 "I 615.45 r J3 *.# +.. -C-6/26/e4 -- - - -- - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - - - -- -- - _...— --- - - - - -- - - - - *f* -CKS 184586 - - 105.53 WARNER INDUSTRIAL G -N SUPPLIES 10 4504 - 30130 F.I4+ 105.55 ^2 °3 fa•a *r * **- CK$...r — 18458Q U6/25/84 208.74 XEROX CORPORATICN LOUIP RENAL 10- 4226 - 510 -51 208.74 -, - - - ^� ---------------- ..- ..-- - - ---- -- *** -CKS 50 184593 06/25/A4 25.45 MINNESOTA CLAY INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23- 1209 - 000 -00 fi_i - - - - - -- -- ------- - - - - -- 53 •*** ++ **f- CKS „r 54 � �- TB4603----- L'6/27/84- 2,iS00:II0 - -- - 4IITTEK -GOLF - SUPPLY-- - - " - -- GRANGE SUPPLIES------ 27 =4b37- 663 -66 -- - - " - -- - -- - -" - ' 55 „I 50 29600.00 * 4 ---' 1984 CITY OF EDINA -�!z-C�'�/'E -----ArOUNl«ENDgR o*ccn ncszm7cn 07~02~84 pxsc xz / z Tc p ococpzPTInNAcCOuvr mC9_INx. * p°o° o pcosxss j � 184612 06f26/84 80.40 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10-4 5 24- 30 1- 30 184?03 r,6/25/84 1-9000 .00 RA IN HURDMA h CPA PRO' --1-0-4216-160-16 1847(,2 06/25/84 25.00 gla COMPTROLLER TREASURER CONT SERV 30-4200- 783- 78 41 CTS 10-42PS-420-42 354.00 IS4705 C6/25/94 40.00 PN DEPT OF PUBLIC TELEPHONE SERY 10-4268-420-42" 1841106 J6/25/84 6.36 LEXINGTON LANDSCP GEN SUPPLIES 10-45C4-390-30 6.36 ' 184707 06/25/84 425.90 CCN WERDLING —/ `\ -_ '| � lea.00 �1 �q .~-..- """^',"° °~.ou xuvx,cE cnx/rn oocnp»vncmT uc ' vo~norn~000~oo ^ *o~nn ° ^ .^`. .- � ' ^' - ' `.� -1 ~./ -' 04 44 184714 06/25184 17.50 AUTO SOUND CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 r *~ 41 31 .68 , 18*716 06125ve4 �n 'no --'— '--- '---`~^ ~-- ~ SUPPLIES 10~4504-390~30 r 18*716 uu�as/o* 24~ 00 -°--- ZIT TEL nn-cNe000s scm swppL^co 10~*504~390~30 39 .0-0 - - '-- — -- --' ' -----'----' wn 184717 nx*r,�'----u*xns�o�------------97.34 oo1axxx^ 16.*0 ------'o�n�«rH/�l�bwa�n�---------ncw'oUppLIES HIAWATHA Lowocn ssm muppcIcn 10~*504~31e~30 504-]nU-�O------- ��- v�o �* ~ ° . � ft ------ --- -� - -----------79.-'ro or�---' ------- - - - -'--- -- -- -------- ' - -- - - '| 1847-35 vn^ xxwccor onwox^nrs umpnon �rcps xu~*zau~�ax~*a �� ----- ____r�/2� �s� ��--- _______�.veo.vo '---'--' -'__� _ _ _ _ _ _.. 184736 oo/a�/n� 250.00 oon o�oow p�cruxcm scm oupp��cu ../. ao~^so*~aav~oa ��! CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VE NOD R ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. A F*O. PESSAG 184737 c6v25/84 92.50 7uIw czr, pIcroxs acm uuppLIco '. 20~4504~621~62 ��-�----�------------pa�x --------------'-------------------- ---- -- --- --: ,� 5. WARD __ ' _-I^n7 xnr CEN7E_- _-'-__23-4100-614-61 .. _ __ _ ��� 184719 :6/25/?4 3.79 ED MCDEVITT CO REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 184719 C6125/84 22.6� EC PCDEVTTT CC PARTS 10-4620-560-56 184720 06/25/84 254.56 Wm GOE-TSCH ASSCIC REPArR PARATS 30-4 54C- 78 5- 78 3 51 75 � ,l 133.80 _ DECKER ~ ~~..^. ~ .^"~~ ° -~"." ..-~^~^-^^^-^" , nO � oo xcLLv ocnoIcc INC ucnx 10~*200~140~14 !"4~ 0 KELLY xcnxzcs INC oZxx 10~*200~330~30 = 114730 C6/25/94 an-'------*c��v noo.00 �snxzcE -I^c KELLY sEnvIcc INC oEno -- --'----- cowr ocnx ---10~4Z00~33C~30 10~4200~*40~44 �` ^ 184730 06/261144 32J.63 KELLY scnxzcc INC ucnxzcco ,o~�auo~*4o~�� --'-- ---- -- -- -------'------- '-- - lb .. 184731 06/25/14 *8.97 THE wrmurow comP osm suppL�co 1u~*�o�~aa�~a* ' ---xm~«r�r'----------- -'--' -- - '---'---�--- - - - - - z 06v25vY4 RETAIL ox oru SYSTEM ocp covr �l��_ �o~*z�u~oa�~oo __oa��� aa.sO ° ___ __ _rx -- --- --'- --- '-- -----' --- '.~ n uo/nxxe* 39*65.22 sn��oIpIrurIuw INC cuxT ncpxIxs *n~*a*m-ou�~oo z------ ------ - -�---'- '39465"22 ^r----- - ---- - - --� --'-- ----'------- -- '-- - - -- � |.� 194734 �6/25/84 rv.rn ooYLs Lnucn CO ocm ouppL/co 10~450*~421~*2 ft ------ --- -� - -----------79.-'ro or�---' ------- - - - -'--- -- -- -------- ' - -- - - '| 1847-35 vn^ xxwccor onwox^nrs umpnon �rcps xu~*zau~�ax~*a �� ----- ____r�/2� �s� ��--- _______�.veo.vo '---'--' -'__� _ _ _ _ _ _.. 184736 oo/a�/n� 250.00 oon o�oow p�cruxcm scm oupp��cu ../. ao~^so*~aav~oa ��! ---'------�- -- ' ----------aO�OO�-------------'' s - ------ - --------'-------- ---� - -' .`� 184737 c6v25/84 92.50 7uIw czr, pIcroxs acm uuppLIco '. 20~4504~621~62 ��-�----�------------pa�x --------------'-------------------- ---- -- --- --: ,� -_184738_ __--C6'/25vF4120'*0VPARr/ON- WARD __ ' _-I^n7 xnr CEN7E_- _-'-__23-4100-614-61 .. _ __ _ ��� J 198* czn OF cnInx coccn nswzorcm CHECK NO. oArc unnuwr xcmoox Insn ococnIpTzom ~.' 120.00 ° , ^ --18�7�* --�*�75�o�' -- 297 50 --- LUNnS -------- '' - - com7 SEhv----'— 297.50 ° °| v4n-'--_0u/anvm4----�-------���on -'---��FwY-uzmacE-rmC - �-'--nEFLmo ,, vz.uo ° ov~oa~o« pxsc v* xccowmr mo° zNv° o p°n° w pconxsc / °°°-cwx '^j `^ |.� vo*r4n oa�zam* n^n.n* oop*cn OIL CO pxmu vu~�*ao~sao~sa ----- ----�- - -�-'-- '-- -z4o"�-�--------------'--' 194744 06/26f84 19002.02 KrY CADILLAC CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-560-56 IP4745 C6/2i6/94 35.00 VENDORS SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 27-4249-661-66 1114746 06/26/t'4 216.00 FRICEN ALCATEL SERV CONT 10-42 88- 510- 51 24 184747 06/26/84 106.25 EMINA PET HOSPITAL SERVICES 10-4 224- 470- 4 7 � � 271 184148 06/26/84 10997700- J CE GREUPHER CORRECTION 2.1 18474F 06/26/84 109577.00 J,CE GRELPHEF 6AGES 2?-4100-675-66 10 999 7 .10 3.3 165.00 33 184750 06/26/34 149 .)1 MM FLEXIBLE CORP TOOLS 10-45?0-301-30 101 42.60 4 184752 C6/261%�4 35.39 LISSON TRUCK SALES REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 184752 06126/84 243.69 ITESON TRUCK SALES REPAIR PAFTS 10-4540-560-56 194753 06/261�4 43.62 JAMES H SULLIVAN REPAIRS SPRINKLER 10-45C4- 31 8-3C 40 06/26/94 122.40 AFFILIATED HCSP SERV AMBULANCE SERY 10-3180-000-00 18-47.55 36126/84 70.15 NANCY BROWN MILEAGE 27-4208-660-66 54 184756 06/26f P.4 19530.00 VGA INC COMP HANDICAPS 27-34 70-OOU-00 184756 06M/84 19530*00- VGA INC CORRECTICN 27-3470-660-66 «w '- ^ � 19814 Y OF ECINA CHECK IS TF R C7-02- PAGE 15 %w Cf,ECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENOOP ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. 4 P.O. I MESSAGE I84756 06/26f84 159430.00- RGA INO CORRECTION 27-3470-660-66 zl 3 184756 06/26f84 15943C.00 VGA ING - CORRECTION 27-3470-660-66 184757 C6/27/84 47.33 CONVEY SAFETY PROD SAFETY EQUIP 10 -4642- 301 -30 11--184757 SAF=ETY- PROD - SAFETY E001 P___ _______lD_4642_ 30 1-;3Cj---- 41 16C:q7 184758 06/27/84 --- 50.t00- CONST REFUND__ 30-3525-000-00—­ i3 53.00 • 4 --------- 2805 PICWrST-_ ART----- 6SUBSCRIPTICN__________ - - -23- 420461 0 -61 171 28.95 184760 26/27fQ4 200 00- BOB-SOBCOVIAK CLEANING SERVICES 23-4 200--610- 61 zoo.,)r) 184761- 06127134 -982900 TAYLOR--SALES- ----CCNSTRUCTICtl-----------26-13r-C-DCC-OC- 241 '01 184761 06f27/04 262.46 TAYLOR SALES CONCESSIONS 26-4624-684-68 39051.46 184762 06127/84 75.48 L L DIST SYSTEM INC CONCESSIONS 26-4624-684-68 75.48 184763 06/27/84 12.07 MARILYN FISCHREIN REFUND 20-3500-000-00 12.00 • 44W ***-CKS zi_,_184764 06/?7/94 --14- DO ___ARLME_ FRIDAY CANCELLA71CN--------------20-3500 4j 31 184765 J6/27/84 16:00 PATRICIA WALSH CANCELLATION 20 - 3 5 0 0: OC (0) 00-' (0) CC, 424 ,— .099 184766 06/271%14 46.50 CUANr-* NIELSEN CCNT REPAIRS 26- 4248- 689 -68 96.50 • 194767 06/27/84 41.25 AMERICAN BAKERIES CONCESSIONS 26-4624-684-68 41 41.?5 184768 06/27/84 19355.00 FOGERS PAINT 9 SERV CONSTRUCTION 23- 1300 - 000 -00 42 1055.00 184769 C6127/P4 154.08 THE HORINER COMP GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-440-44 154.08 184770 06/27f84 57.21 H L MOORE 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10-4510-440-44 40 57.21 • 411 nS 50! 184771 06/27/84 149*68 CUSTOM CAMERA PHOTO SUPPLIES 10-4508-440-44 17 149.68 53 184772 06/27/94 414.46 HENN CTY MEDICAL GEN SUPPLIES 10-4510-440-44 54 414.46 7, 184773 06/27/84 40.10 LABEL MASTER GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504-440-44 - '- � 1 984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07-02-84 PAGE 16 r_,FCHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. rNV* 0 PoOo 0 IWESSAGE 40 .10 4[ ---184774 06/27/84 200.20 r-Hysro-CONTROL I ST -AID - SUPPLIE_!§ 10---45 10-440-44 184715 06/27f84 3,597.90 LAKE RESTORATION CONT SERV 10-4 200- 35 8- 30 CAPITOL OUTLAY 20-4 900- 600-6Cj 11 184777 06/27/84 45.54 MELISSA MCINTYRE MILEAGE 10-4208-480-48 1-5 45.54 17 1947-18 Vi f) 7 / 84 15 .00 YIELD TIHE KEYS ADVERTISING 50-4 214- 82G- 3 2 154f f9 06/27/94 25.00 CO LUMBIA BOOKS INC commooiTrEs 20-4500�;600-60 o�rpn-----c6127,84 ------- zn,.as---' --sxxrwsn-nsFoIon----'----cournEpxlnu------------ar�4a*W�vop~ra --'- -- --- - ' a n - .a s^ .� ' n4r0, �----o6vz7 8 4----�-------73 7 6----'--*0 LmSrCN_ Icc nIwmS[-----pxIN7--------�----'---ao-4s44-70r~70 -'-- --- ---- '-----�_ rx~ra �� �� - --=| ' 32 94182 06/27/84 306:5 5 ICE SKATING INS7 FIGURE SKATING 20-2 2 35—OUO-00 ^^ 33; 330.55 ] '. � 36 250.00 ' ^ - n1_1947 84 06/271F4 2.63 CUAKE SCHUYLTZ REFUND 40-3560-000-OC 6 v2 7�,m 4_ *s.or cprc reLrvn mz�cAsc vo~ov�v-ouo~no _0 ---'-�--- �n.xr� -- ------'---- -- -�-- -- --''---''-- ---- - 45 1847A6 o�6v27/84vo.5o cn LAmcELLn ouppLzco 1o~«so4~o�o~�u `" � ' vn�scr-^-- -- ----- --- -' - ---- -------'---'------------ - ----- �! .' °°°~c*s ~- --------------------ua�7o0 °,4--------pomo-,n-rnrvc---------mcmsn«c-ru ----'----------� - ---�-'--�| 12 ,960 ,95 pumo ao mr^L pxon pomo 2,*00.71 pumo 23 TOTAL xor ccmca - - - -----'4,znr.sz--- pumn'am'rnTAL - -- owIwnzwo pmtL rUwu-------' 189362.85 rowm ar rnmL snLr Couxoc pumo = 29088.02 puNo ap TOTAL xccnc*rzmm ccm7cm rumo "- ����---�--'-------------------------56 0 10 nxmac'puxo-------------------------- ----- '--'--�� ^�7� 89148.0,7 puwn on 7orxL wx7cawonm pufio '^| [`|- �� �� &,.,._ -- _ - .._ _.... . .- � 199 4 Y CF EOINA CF =Cl %ISTER C7 -02- PAGE 17 a CHECK NO. DATE — - -- -- AMOUNT Vr- NOOF. ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N09 INV. q P.O. 4 MESSAGE _ I 4,891.61 FUND 4C TOTAL SEWER RENTAL FUND J 1,366.50 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISFENSAP.Y FUND . �- 19?05.50 rUNn 69 TOTAL CQNSTRUCTICN FUND �c 122,387.77 T(TAL Computer checks Ps 57546 thru 57371 1 1 -a ICI � n: �I 1 — -- -- - ------------------- ,7, Is 1 4