The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1984-11-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 19, 1984 7:00 P. M. ROLLCALL EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Public comment heard. First reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals from Administration or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. V. ORDINANCES. First Reading of Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/4 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading is waived. A. Second Reading * 1. Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 - Amending Massage /Sauna Ordinance VI. FINANCE * A. Liquor Fund as of 8/31/84 and 9/30/84 B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 10/31/84: General Fund $178,028.54, Park Fund $1,321.99, Art Center $254.67, Swimming Pool Fund $10,819.42, Golf Course Fund 7,404.60, Recreation Center Fund $2,506.95, Gun Range Fund $235.64, Waterwork Fund $3,909.21, Sewer Rental Fund $160.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund $281,659.21, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $606.00, Total $286.907.42; and for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/19/84: General Fund $155,781.50, Park Fund $21,560.74, Art Center $8,838.65, Swimming Pool Fund $6,801.75, Golf Course Fund $5,460.17, Recreation Center Fund $8,041.60, Gun Range Fund $466.52, Waterwork Fund $22,239.96, Sewer Rental Fund $3,998.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $95,901.19, Construction Fund $61,570.40, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $3,433.09, Total $394,094.52. A. Zoning Change 1. Second Reading a. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District, to MD -5 Mixed Development District - Edinborough - Generally located west of York Avenue and south of West 76th Street.(Continue to 12/3/84) B. Conditional Use Permit 1. Our Lady of Grace Church, 5051 Eden Avenue South - Generally located west of T.H. 100 and south of Eden Avenue C. Preliminary Plat Approval * 1. Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and west of Brookview Avenue D. Final Plat Approval * 1. Valley View Heights 2nd Addition - Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue * 2. Svanoe Addition - Generally located at 7013 Lee Valley Circle II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Full -Sized Sedans for Police Usage IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of 11/13/84 B. John Keefe - .County Commissioner Elect C. Application for Beer License - Holiday Station Store - 50th Street & Interlachen D. Set Board of Review Date * E. 1985 Holidays * F. AMM General Meeting - 12/6/84 G. Metropolitan Council Proposed Housing Chapter H. Metropolitan Legislative Commission Joint Powers Agreement I. City Hall Relocation Study J. _Special Concerns of Mayor and Council K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items _ 1. Wooddale School Site Hearing Process 2. Wine Referendum V. ORDINANCES. First Reading of Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/4 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading is waived. A. Second Reading * 1. Ordinance No. 1353 -A1 - Amending Massage /Sauna Ordinance VI. FINANCE * A. Liquor Fund as of 8/31/84 and 9/30/84 B. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 10/31/84: General Fund $178,028.54, Park Fund $1,321.99, Art Center $254.67, Swimming Pool Fund $10,819.42, Golf Course Fund 7,404.60, Recreation Center Fund $2,506.95, Gun Range Fund $235.64, Waterwork Fund $3,909.21, Sewer Rental Fund $160.99, Liquor Dispensary Fund $281,659.21, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $606.00, Total $286.907.42; and for payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/19/84: General Fund $155,781.50, Park Fund $21,560.74, Art Center $8,838.65, Swimming Pool Fund $6,801.75, Golf Course Fund $5,460.17, Recreation Center Fund $8,041.60, Gun Range Fund $466.52, Waterwork Fund $22,239.96, Sewer Rental Fund $3,998.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $95,901.19, Construction Fund $61,570.40, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $3,433.09, Total $394,094.52. ■ ST C, N 0 BA d V i,� �P4d;A iP S 111111 m 11� EDINA PUBLIC WORKS CENTER am, Em IN nA� HILLTOP y / 0 CIT ' HALL 6k PUBLUC o POLICE LIBRA ac DEPT. :�� )�, ^'•1 ^� 1 3 EDINA COUNT a� b r L (/� OR NUMBER C -84 -2 Our Lady of Grace L O C A T 10 N West of T. H. 100 and south of Eden Avenue REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Po C `3k f C -84 -2 Our Lady of Grace Church - Conditional Use Permit Generally located: West of T.H. 100 and south of Eden Avenue Mr. Hughes reported that Our Lady of Grace Church is proposing a 23,650 square foot addition to their existing church building. This addition will house a new sanctuary, a small chapel, meeting rooms and other related facilities. The existing sanctuary will be converted into a gymnasium for use by Our Lady of Grace School. The proposed new sanctuary will contain pew seating for 848 people and space for overflow seating for an additional 133. (Pew seating has been based on one person per 18 inches of pew space.) The proposed addition requires few alterations to the balance of the church property. No new parking lots are proposed and none are required as a result of the addition. Other than a minor extension and redevelopment of the main entry drive, no other changes to the balance of the site are proposed. Staff believes that the findings required for the _ issuance of the conditional use permit have been met and a permit should, therefore, be issued. No modifications of the plans are necessary to protect adjoining properties. Mr. Hughes recommended approval subject to the permit_ being limited to the plans presented. He noted that Mr. John J41stice, architect, was present to answer any questions. Mrs. McClelland moed for approval of the conditional use permit subject to the plans presented. Mr. Ring seconded the motion. Mr. Palmer and Mr. Bailey obstained. All were in favor; the motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 31. 1984 C -84 -2 Our Lady of Grace Church - Conditional Use Permit Generally located: West of T.H. 100 and south of Eden Avenue Refer to: Attached plans Our Lady of Grace Church is proposing a 23,650 square foot addition to their existing church building. This additiion will house a new sanctuary, a small chapel, meeting rooms and other related facilities.. The existing sanctuary will be converted into a gymnasium for use by Our Lady of Grace School. The proposed new sanctuary will contain pew seating for 848 people and space for overflow seating for an additional 133. (Pew seating has been based on one person per 18 inches of pew space.) The proposed addition requires few alterations to the balance of the church property. No new parking lots are proposed and none are required as a result of the addition. (The current parking count exceeds Ordinance requirements by about 127 spaces which should provide more than adequate parking even if other activities occur during church services.) The parking expansion shown on the site plan is not proposed as part of this project, but may be constructed in the future if needed. Other than a minor extension and redevelopment of the main entry drive, no other changes to the balance of the site are proposed. The church property is bordered by residential uses only on its south side. The proposed new sanctuary will be located about 350 feet from the nearest single family home to the south. Existing landscaping along the south property line effectively screens the proposed addition from the homes to the south. The new Zoning Ordinance requires the issuance of a conditional use permit prior to church expansions. The attached plans respond to the requirements of the Ordinance with the exception of a landscape plan which has not as yet been prepared. The applicant notes that due to the presence of many mature trees in the vicinity of the addition, significant new landscaping will not be needed and the landscape plan will consist mainly of foundation plantings. Recommendation Staff believes that the findings required for the issuance of the conditional use permit have been met and a permit should, therefore, be issued. In our view, no modifications of the plans are necessary to protect adjoining properties. We agree that the project does not require the addition of the subtantial amounts of new landscaping. The applicant has agreed, however, to submit a landscape plan for our review final to Council action on the permit. We recommend approval subject to the permit being limited to the plans presented. s" ---- -------- I Cale Ow ft. I ' :4I --- --------- 4 Pa k ng 5 8- Mop-off h 0.1d . ...... 7 G--bo 4 Parking I .pan ...... 19 00 Ill. OUR LADY N GRACE ell _rj- `1 1 ��TTT1�1 — I.1 I _1 • •. Ix Ix I I I Ix Ix 1 n � [ %KiWG tl(mDwC 1 12 ; 1 11 0; II P `7 �I 11 II 11 �1n 11111 r ,• Ih 1 I m 'r • '. rr ' i � f • 1 II,• • I �1<•T•J� 07, I PROPC,RD BUIIDINC t - O C7= OUR LADY )F GRACE I Drnlr. Oil 2 Rdmp 1 Cnnr nu,.r i .. \Ir,•I,nq Roum, b H,1dr Ronm (I) Room SI 1-91' N \ur.r•rY n I,.mR Rnum Cnmmnn. lu Oordnnr (�n�n,rn. I I (.a /ebu -'I Cunt. 1 SY Yh RhI Abo- IJ Hle,.r•d Sal,an„•n1 eh.lnrl li Rn(nn•rhalrun Ihalrel Ih lu�irl IN Ambul,n„ry 1'1 Imm,•rilon Font !11 lr Coola jl Altar 2! Ambo 21 Pn•,.dr, !4 Rorr•do1 !: UrR.,n Inn. nlr !tl ( hmr !y Pla, ,• UI Honor 111 Ilr•.�hl,• Spa(,•. Choral 11 Snr r,.lY I., 0—nR Room. %w(- mig Ronm 11 Lor h,•n 14 Inl lu.r•d m0k,—, 16 (;Y. 1 Sl or d Re IN (h,lnpinl; Room, 1.1 ()111, ,• !o )'oath Room 4 R(•(n1,1np Proposed Bu1Id.q GoH Area 23,650 17.1t, 1. of t ra•• J4• I I h • • i' `� /i i 1�• ' . • II I':.' JJ . i.„a1. trJN lJ L..JR�a IN � r 1 ,) • all � . ., 6 6 IF 07, I PROPC,RD BUIIDINC t - O C7= OUR LADY )F GRACE I Drnlr. Oil 2 Rdmp 1 Cnnr nu,.r i .. \Ir,•I,nq Roum, b H,1dr Ronm (I) Room SI 1-91' N \ur.r•rY n I,.mR Rnum Cnmmnn. lu Oordnnr (�n�n,rn. I I (.a /ebu -'I Cunt. 1 SY Yh RhI Abo- IJ Hle,.r•d Sal,an„•n1 eh.lnrl li Rn(nn•rhalrun Ihalrel Ih lu�irl IN Ambul,n„ry 1'1 Imm,•rilon Font !11 lr Coola jl Altar 2! Ambo 21 Pn•,.dr, !4 Rorr•do1 !: UrR.,n Inn. nlr !tl ( hmr !y Pla, ,• UI Honor 111 Ilr•.�hl,• Spa(,•. Choral 11 Snr r,.lY I., 0—nR Room. %w(- mig Ronm 11 Lor h,•n 14 Inl lu.r•d m0k,—, 16 (;Y. 1 Sl or d Re IN (h,lnpinl; Room, 1.1 ()111, ,• !o )'oath Room 4 R(•(n1,1np Proposed Bu1Id.q GoH Area 23,650 17.1t, 1. of t ra•• PIR RUM PROPOSED BUILDING East EXISTING BUILDING North OUR LAM DF GRACE PROPOSED BUILDING LL 16 T, IrTtntmmF,- L13 EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING West I n- R" r�R RI PROPOSED BUILDING Section OUR LAD` GRACE 1101 wrrn,rr ...• . ....... .....o • EXISTING BUILDING 19 OCT.194•1 4 O ? a F ' SUBDIVIS00h vim" L O C A T 10 N Victorsen`s Valley Veiw 2nd Addition Generally located south of Valley View and west of Brookview Avenue REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT rG S-84-15 Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition v Generally located: South of Valley View Road and west of 10, S\1 Brookview Avenue Mr. Hughes stated that the applicant requests a two lot plat of two pre- existing unplatted parcels. The westerly unplatted parcel (which roughly coincides with Parcel A of the new plat) has been owned by the proponent for many years, is landlocked and is, therefore, unbuildable. The easterly unplatted parcel (which roughly coincides with Parcel B of the new plat) is developed with a single dwelling unit building fronting on Brookview Avenue. This parcel was recently acquired by the applicant. The proposed plat is requested to provide a 20 foot strip across the easterly parcel to provide access for the westerly parcel. If approved, a new single dwelling unit building is proposed of the westerly lot. Mr. Hughes explained that Parcel A does not meet the minimum lot width requirement of 75 feet, therefore, a 55 foot lot width variance is needed. The proposed new lot is located about 45 feet from the Garrison Lane cul de sac. To gain access to Garrison Lane, the applicant would need to acquire property from the homeowner to the west. The applicant reports that he has been unable to acquire such an access. Mr. Hughes explained that the proposed plat creates a parcel which we have described in the past as a neck lot. The Comprehensive Plan states the following policy: Prohibit "neck lot" subdivisions whereby access to public streets is gained through narrow strips of land adjacent to other lots. Mr. Hughes also noted that the lot width definition -of the Zoning Ordinance was suggested by staff to prohibit unusually narrow cul de sac lots and neck lots such as this. Based upon the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, Mr. Hughes, stated the City has the rationale to deny the subdivision. Mr. Hughes said that the Commission and Council should be aware of several points in making the determination of unique circumstances or undue hardship in connection with the requested lot width variance: First, the division which created the westerly landlocked parcel apparently was not approved by the City. Second, the landlocked parcel is not a "non- conforming lot ". Therefore, this parcel did not comply with the Ordinance when created and has always been unbuildable. Third, the landlocked parcel and the easterly parcel have now, in essence, been combined by virture of their present common ownership into one, conforming lot.he City may not be obliged now to resubdivide the property to create an additional lot which does not comply with our Ordinance. Also, the lot resulting from the combination of the parcels is actually smaller in size than the R -1 lot immediately to the south. Fourth, the landlocked parcel could be accessed better from Garrison Lane. Based upon these issues, Mr. Hughes suggested that approval of the subdivision and variance is not warranted and should be denied. Mr. and Mrs. Victorsen were present. Mrs. Victorsen spoke explaining that the parcel was a beautiful lot which overlooked a pond. They originally purchased the property intending to build garages for an adjacent apartment building. which they owned, but decided against the extra garages at a later time. The Victorsen's contacted the Garrisons and the Eisenbreys in an attempt to negotiate access to this parcel from the west. Neither party agreed to participate. Mrs. Victorsen explained the landlocked parcel was created when Southdale Center purchased it in 1956 for utilitu purposes. She pointed out that the City was well aware at the time the land was divided in 1956, that it was. land locked and could have made objections at that time. She also mentioned 6128 Timber Ridge, a lot platted in 1978, which the City approved as a neck lot. She argued that the subdivision should be granted. Mr. and Mrs. Victorsen noted that an alternative plan of adding 20 feet to the proposed drive aisle. .Mr. Eisenbrey, 6228 Brookview Avenue, stated that the Victorsens had informed them that they intended to build doubles on the property. Mr. Eisenbrey stated his objection to any rezoning. He was asked if he would object to a single dwelling unit on the lot and Mr. Eisenbrey would not be satisfied with that either. Mr. Garth Holmes, 6220 Brookview Avenue, also objected to any rezoning. Rev. Timothy Clay, 6221 Brookview Avenue, related at parable in which the moral implied that the subdivision may only be the start of what the Victorsens would really be doing with the lot. Mrs. Victorsen attempted to reassure them that a single dwelling unit was the only plan the Victorsens were interested in. Mr. Swant, 4428 Garrison Lane, complained about the present parking problems of the apartment buildings. He would like to see the lot used for its originally intended purpose of garage space. Mrs. Victorsen explained that they no longer owned the apartment buildings. Mrs. McClelland stated that based on the fact that the parcel was landlocked when purchased and the City does not have a legally recorded subdivision on the original lot, she recommended denial of the subdivision. She noted that in planning, the Commission has worked to discourage neck lots. Mrs. McClelland stated she did not see a hardship or an overwhelming desire or need for this subdivision. Mr. Palmer seconded the motion. All were in favor; the motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 31, 1984 S -84 -15 Victorsen's Valley View 2nd Addition Refer to: Attached preliminary plat Generally located: South of Valley View Road and west of Brookview Avenue The applicant requests a two lot plat of two pre- existing unplatted parcels. The westerly unplatted parcel (which roughly coincides with Parcel A of the new plat) has been owned by the proponent for many years, is landlocked and is, therefore, unbuildable. The easterly unplatted parcel (which roughly coincides with Parcel B of the new plat) is developed with a single dwelling unit building fronting on Brookview Avenue. This parcel was recently acquired by the applicant. The proposed plat is requested to provide a 20 foot strip across the easterly parcel to provide access for the westerly parcel. If approved, a new single dwelling unit building is proposed of the westerly lot. The proposed plat also requires the grant of a subdivision variance. The Zoning Ordinance requires that the required minimum lot width of 75 feet must be met at a point 50 feet from the front lot line. The front lot line is Parcel As frontage on.Brookview Avenue. The lot width measured 50 feet from the front lot line is.20 feet. Thus, a 55 foot variance is needed. Apparently, the land composing the property in question was originally a single parcel of property. The westerly portion of the property was sold in 1956 to Southdale Center, Inc., thereby creating the westerly landlocked parcel. We have been unable to find that the City approved the division caused by this 1956 sale. We also cannot determine the reason for Southdale's desire to own the property. In 1962, the applicant platted Victorsen's Valley View which adjoins the landlocked parcel to the north. In the same year, the applicant constructed an eight unit apartment building on this property. On January 8, 1964, the applicant acquired the landlocked parcel. Earlier this year, the applicant acquired the easterly parcel. The applicant no longer owns the apartment site. The proposed new lot is located about 45.feet from the Garrison Lane cul de sac. To gain access to Garrison Lane, the applicant would need to acquire property from the homeowner to the west. The applicant reports that he has been unable to acquire such an access. Recommendation The proposed plat creates a parcel which we have described in the past as a neck lot. The Comprehensive Plan states the following policy: Prohibit "neck lot" subdivisions whereby access to public streets is gained through narrow strips of land adjacent to other lots. The lot width definition of the Zoning Ordinance was suggested by staff to prohibit unusually narrow cul de sac lots and neck lots such as this. Based upon the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance, I believe the City has the rationale to deny the subdivision. The principal question in this case revolves around the requested variance and the City's determination as to the existence of unique circumstances and undue hardship while recognizing the spirit and intent of the Ordinance. The Commission and Council should be aware of several points in making this determination. First, the division which created the westerly landlocked parcel apparently was not approved by the City. Second, the landlocked parcel is not a "non- conforming lot ", i.e. a lot which complied with our Ordinances when created, but which does not now comply due only to a change in the Ordinance. In 1956, when this parcel was created, the Zoning Ordinance requird a minimum frontage of 75 feet on a public street. Therefore, this parcel did not comply with'the Ordinance when created and has always been unbuildable. Third, the landlocked parcel and the easterly parcel have now, in essence, been combined by virture of their present common ownership into one, conforming lot. The Zoning Ordinance definition of "lot" in important is this respect: Lot: The basic development unit for purposes of this Ordinance. A lot may consist of one parcel or two or more adjoining parcels under single ownership or control, and used for a principal use and accessory uses allowed by this Ordinance. A lot, except lots in a townhouse plat, must have at least 30 feet frontage on a street other than a limited access freeway. The City may not be obliged now to resubdivide the property to create an additional lot which does not comply with our Ordinance. Also, the lot resulting from the combination of the parcels is actually smaller in size than the R -1 lot immediately to the south. Fourth, in my opinion, the landlocked parcel could be accessed better from Garrison Lane. This access would be shorter and would likely result in a more logical orientation of a new dwelling. Based upon these issues, I suggest that approval of the subdivision and variance is not warranted and should be denied. 941 -3031 Eder. Prairie, 1'2: 55344 Survey For Folke Victorsen Book Page rile North line_ of NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 Sec. 30, T. 28, R 24 Point 658.5 ft. E. of NW corner. PARCEL A The South 104 feet of that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, North Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 distant 658.5 feet East of the North- west corner thereof, thence South a distance of 438 feet, thence East parallel with the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 287.3 feet more or less to the West line of Peacedale Acres, thence North a distance of 438 feet, thence West to the point of beginning. EXCEPT: The South 84.0 feet lying Easterly of the West 140 feet of said tract. PARCEL B The South,84.0'feet lying Easterly of the West 140 feet of the following described "tract: The South 104 feet of that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, North Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 distant 658.5 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South a distance of 438 feet, thence East parallel with the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a a distance of 287.3 feet more or less to the West line of Peacedale Acres, thence North a distance of 438 feet, thence West to the point of beginning. 1 hereby =rtlfy that this It a hao and corroe reprwooatotlea of a survey o/ the boeadsrke of above described prone rtV Neaaepla Ceaety, "'aaosoto and of the locaMiea of all bell4ses tboroon, and all v{rlble •acreachnow4 If any, hen or an sold load. EerveyW by me thl, n 1- d-- of - , 1 p A . CA.^.DA.:ELLF G ASSOCIATES, INC. 2s73-- Nk. / 90' - a ' Nt- 3►.4, a j 6 Z?4�i� PARCEL A f O l� a PARCELS B7.3 . w Scale: 1 " =50' PARCEL A The South 104 feet of that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, North Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 distant 658.5 feet East of the North- west corner thereof, thence South a distance of 438 feet, thence East parallel with the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 287.3 feet more or less to the West line of Peacedale Acres, thence North a distance of 438 feet, thence West to the point of beginning. EXCEPT: The South 84.0 feet lying Easterly of the West 140 feet of said tract. PARCEL B The South,84.0'feet lying Easterly of the West 140 feet of the following described "tract: The South 104 feet of that part of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 30, Township 28, North Range 24, West of the 4th Principal Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 distant 658.5 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, thence South a distance of 438 feet, thence East parallel with the North line of said Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a a distance of 287.3 feet more or less to the West line of Peacedale Acres, thence North a distance of 438 feet, thence West to the point of beginning. 1 hereby =rtlfy that this It a hao and corroe reprwooatotlea of a survey o/ the boeadsrke of above described prone rtV Neaaepla Ceaety, "'aaosoto and of the locaMiea of all bell4ses tboroon, and all v{rlble •acreachnow4 If any, hen or an sold load. EerveyW by me thl, n 1- d-- of - , 1 p A . CA.^.DA.:ELLF G ASSOCIATES, INC. 78 W. ^�-Gl4 �1 = t e °pd.y5 N 1153 -12 938 v f O -- aa•8u4r. oA- N 1 G•14'3io d9g�41 #.,a — r ' . : �4y \c 78 � (�I �0 N c qlcc � ? �, w i � � .'v ,,, tae �� ••LB2i.5• '�C "� r �'_,. �. s�fC 7L\j �. j. �1�'�1 �`•.^th (�,�+/i1V J�• -, 7 lygl" a 1e4945 ^ .°Q. 1ev . o., \ �� o N. `� of �Q� •j o b� v ,� LX� c C 1 l 6'E Jd sb,�bat'I' ,19.32 84.'x0 3 0 f°, 1 8�91s �• n r•iso 24d .. m' a N m •r VICTORSEN S VALLEY v :y R °�J 2 a �� , Z p,15 3 BS•9s'so=,rg .. 7 �. .+ I� "- l33 -i•, VIE t. �T' �, 4 6y _. 15�� o� i° n 7S o-. ` C • .. � 19.61 84.47 ° �lJ.�.M. 151.89 t t s.,y • Q s+j b1 dos ii '8e3947° I � ,� � /4 58Y 4G" 7 0' � :. J� v.�. 1 •' . ti � 15J. 7 r1t _ t• iog, +p�91 �N �•.Q n {' \\ -.t v P.. N 7° � ry , V .• 0/ 80•f N .. 2S3 34 6 ,e 5 P: _ ' Ne9.43•w -380- o g TB 8J 3/ r-•�+ ' 1 `0.. S�G �, o - --i ut �/�i r�2 �yr_~ -� 'tii4,Y��o:�q�51= i �' I �� ai0�' PART _(f71 i r Sd59 i \:R,� Rrle e- 0 140 \ !60 v OF V _l l o: 38949'E ��. {y`J n9o1'a �r I + f 1'o :_ o n 1 _ °o pT3( �a�V LOT Is _ •N +. 589399'!` �~ e0 9174�r7' ;S L +4 1 ' R / } ¢� -60 9p. ar�Of ,ice �'..o. 1 s r ` k ra0j/ 140 s• v� P: 67991, r46.95 (' NANC „o 589'47 lo'E N l r�� •o ^�, �• .,, / 3io LOT 82 o ^ 2 2 6 a 101 i5C�1�� I \ s/ .. j�• IS71 8S� v� O m. 'O� p `+: .� •� 2. /i09' �o� 3�� 76 k•^ I �\ oo a i ;�� 4A`� (4200.1( 7ID � ' o�. •t.,l 1 p� �• 7 5a r 1 2 e• '� tj, ' euoal D ' . v ' °p ` w _ v • /7, v .n 0 0 1 i a 7. r �p v ro M I Z 2 n •n lo��. 2 N p�c I . �`n4 8S 6jF 589'44'E 3476 ° r3185P -h 97 T r r I N� es��I{` °r _ f Q n' 030 --r see. c c �l9 • l i2 .. 11 ;;mE 2 g1624Y,7600)sIf�s�i QL'° k Eosi l70 /0 •• hr bi I ,:•- 1 ,, Vrllcge of Edrna L A E ; . ' .• .. Port of Lot i3, • s8•42'f �rf7c;' roo c•71n c \ -� (/960 AK /o/Photol rJ��.•- 1 ,.OLIN' �(�� c OY bck2,rggo W m J at I b�6 ✓ _r• 1 0 Part of o rS o a e o' r i, G �0f 14 w c•�. { 11 J e o•:,4�D �' /to y��3 Z 1 Q 1� z _ / , j�►jl OC Block 2, Pea- y� r 30.53' J `E',! :a r r 1 r ao / / ; ' - : • ANO m cedale Acres �t��ss�2 }..Z (n _ .^a ' ;' 2��l1 0 .y 0 �) w o �9 • 1. r 0 1�65 r' ' , 200. 4(A 'k) dSr f Garvey 120 3 s 165 �IGG�S 5 r 0 A� O WRO 90s . IST 10 �•: �\ — J •Ir f'> a �/ ° �� 1 /� 3 cn ; 1� 8,•m lv%� 3 ,`0 �q�d/�° ,1 'o a BOURGEOIS oADD.� / e0 130 Si 120 m 50 120 w 90 �+ 3<!,� �O = ° - 9333 �_. �` ^' ��; �1. Part.oi iL t 2 w.D. 9.23 58 e W. 1 �r� I 0; 8•IC 60) M �`�' ` \ter, of o W —390 O.C. I_ I 1 n _r -- -re Hii I' , I s n. :Ne. Anuumm • - '1' it •f r� f I. 1,A, :: ly .5 �- f 180 ??59 Dde., p.420 343 25 r. , �/c 1 t.. ~',fir `• i -C tfi� 7�y{. ,;..i +- ''.�\, `, �. 1 6320 Brookview Avenue Edina, 1 %innesota 55424 October 24, 1984 City Clerk & Planning Commission Members 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Gentlemen: It has come to our attention that the property at 6224 Brookview Avenue is being considered for rezoning at the request of a builder who wishes to profit financially by such action. As twelve year residents of this street, we wish to express our opinions on this matter. This rezoning to multiple dwelling status would only open the door to increased traffic, possible rezoning of other lots on this street and possible changes in real estate values. There is not now and never was any reason why this street should be changed from single family residences. We understand a rezoning proposal for 6329 Brookview was disapproved in 1970 as being unsuitable for this street and believe the same circumstances exist here. We strongly object to this rezoning request by a builder who apparently has little regard for the peaceful and safe character of this block. Having observed the site, we believe the location has little to 9ffer a single residence and certainly not a multiple dwelling. Therefore, we feel the _ request shouldn't be approved. Please preserve the fine character of this street and deny I any rezoning request. Sincerely K ruckeberg 9 p oann v. K ruck erg moms Aoq- City Clerk & Planning 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minn. 55424 Dear Members: Commission Members October 24, 1984 This letter is to let you know that we are opposed to the re- zoning of our block here on Brookview Ave. We trust you will consider our feelings on this matter when you take this subject before your commission. Sincerely, Owen and Nancy Brandt 6241 Brookview Ave. So. Edina, Minn. 55424 &-cobieuo �o LQX aesibPozeti4n ffx--- re7-Z-201n/cc ITO aft Rwezidef -T�dU 6&vt, c co = , zt We, I EL End Wv 5 l� V / '�' ti 17 / 1,I ko�d Ed 46 tk� i October 23, 1984 City Clerk and Planning Commission Members 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom It May Concern:. We are very concerned about the proposed zoning change on 62nd and Brookview.' Mr. Folke Victorsen's attempt to put another duplex on our block has the potential of changing our quiet residential neighborhood. South of our property at 6240 Brookview are several small houses. It is an additional concern that in the future these properties may be for sale and Mr. Victorsen or someone else may try to purchase these and add additional duplexes to our block. Several of these properties are owned by elderly people, as was the property at 6224 Brookview. Mr. Victorsen purchased the present property that he is trying to rezone after the owner was placed in a nursing home. The property never went on the market, and none of the neighbors knew it was for sale. My husband and I are Realtors and sell for Eberhardt Company. We had potential buyers for the property that Mr. Victorsen purchased at 6224 Brookview. If the home had been placed on the market any other buyer would have homesteaded the existing home. Instead the existing home at 6224 is now rented and Mr. Victorsen has gained needed access to his land behind the house at 6224 and is now trying to build a non - conforming structure on an R -1 block. Mr. Victorsen has a reputation in our neighborhood as a man experienced in getting zoning changes where they are not wanted. - We -would like to remain on Brookview Avenue to raise our family. We moved to our present home four years ago. Our daughter is five years old and part of the appeal of our home is the large lot on the lake. The street is quiet and currently all our neighbors are owners and all the properties are homesteaded. The one exception is the duplex on the corner of Valley View and Brookview. This was also built by Mr. Victorsen, who occupied for several years and then sold it to the present owners. We have heard Mr. Victorsen intends now to occupy the proposed duplex. We do not believe him and feel this proposed duplex affects the neighborhood and values of our properties in a negative way. We did not buy our present home to live in a rental neighborhood. We are anticipating another child and October 23, 1984 City Clerk and Planning Commission Members Page 2 would like our children to grow up in a stable single family neighborhood. That is why we moved to Edina four years ago. Please keep this proposed duplex out of of our neighborhood. i9'i'ncerely" ` Virginia and James Larkin 6240 Brookview Avenue Edina, Mn 55424 VL /mk .pv N. Yza-� G��s� ss�zy 10 ---4 -84 Edina Planning Commission I would like you to know that I oppose a change in the zoning on our block from single family dwelling to multiple. 1 oppose it even for one house. The value of property on brookview is high and many of the homes are old and are located on large lots. Builders of wealth would quickly purchase these old homes and demolish them -to build duplex buildings. The character of this street would change. I prefer that things remain the way that they are and strongly oppose a change which would allow any building of a duplex on our street. Garth 0. Holmes 6220 brookview Edina, PII%T 55424 ` 922 -0336 Jeanie B Holmes 6220 brookview Edina, PLN.55424 922 -0336 Planning Commission Edina City hall 50th & Vernon Edina, Minnesota 55424 6228 Brookview Ave. 5. Edina, MN 5)424 October 23, 1984 Re: Proposed zoning change at 6224 Brookview We are writing this letter in response to a proposed zoning change (subdivision) requested by Mr. Folke Victorsen of Edina. It is our understanding that Mr. Victorsen is proposing to build a duplex apart- ment house on his land at the rear of the former Pauly residence, which Victorsen recently purchased without the property coming to market. We, as adjacent property owners strongly object to any change in the present R -1 zoning and any change in the existing character of the Brook- view neighborhood. Already Victorsen has cut and bulldozed the lot slated for his apartment leaving a bare plot of ground prior to obtaini.ne your authorization to nerform anv construction. Victorsen has in the past broken the zoning on Brookview by con- structing a two family apartment dwelling on the corner of Valley View and he also constructed two large apartment buildings on Valley View, one of which is still owned by his son. By this latter paragraph, we are trying to demonstrate that 1.7ic- torsen has every intention of breaking the zoning on Brookview and con- structing multiple dwellings. He will use every means at his disposal to break into this neighborhood with his commercial ventures - we don't want it. We ask you to protect our property, our rights, our neighbor- hood and our property values. Do not grant Victorsen or his successors any variance or change in zoning. Most respectfully, Edward HV Fisenbr ::7�_l / za:�7 Elizabeth Eisenbr • • T. , To : :it ;ler. ^r_; - lr^nnin .'om:iission Me- :!bers From: ';r. -.nd `, "rs. ^ichard . cully 6317 Brookview _lvenue egarding the proposed re— zoning of 6224 'lrookview_lvenue lfe strongly object tc the re— zoning of 6224 i rookview :;venue for multiple family occupancy. This is a single family homes -.rea with limited traffic and limited access. Furthermore, the owner has already used a bull —dozer to totally strip the 1,and 1'.•ith a disref*ard for its fine trees. "ith no visible effort to preserve ti,-hatever possible of the roeded Y-ild- life sanctuary it has been and still build a hone there, we see - bsolutely no po.,sibility for this to be an :.asset to the community, ';iucerely yours, kic' .:ic i hn.rd -,n:? betty Scully ♦ , October 25, 1984 City Clerk and Planning Commission Members 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: In regard to the potential re- zoning of 6224 Brookview Avenue South, city of Edina, we as residents and owners of 6237 Brook - view Avenue South are stating our protest against any re- zoning of this block. Since we will be unable to attend the October 31, 1984, 7:30 p.m. meeting, we are submitting this letter in protest. Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. Lester L. Hughes RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Valley View Heights 2nd Addition ", platted by Kent P. Swanson and Sharon J. Swanson, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1984, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. City Clerk LOCATION MAP • 1 R � W OLINGER 81-M I l j�ST LA COu NT Wr= �p Q .:SIDE. '. I ADD .PARK e _-• L I _ ,• FIRE STATION C0 NIAL CHURCH - v� • �\ - j W 1 \ - t 1\ Y 4 r i �- �:; OOR \ � .. It II 16)9 s Z n \ } / J CREEK VALL YALLEr ;:. BAPTIST HI L I DR � CIR PARK': <, T T' , W J .4� � � fiRA ^E TERR - v A : a 4 SUBDIVISION N U M B E R S -84 -9 Valley View Heights 2nd Addition L O C A T 10 N Generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy. REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for Valley View Heights 2nd Addition, generally located south of Valley View Road and east of Tracy Avenue. The request is for a five -lot subdivision to remain zoned R -1 Single Dwelling District. The proposed lots range in area from 12,200 square feet to 21,100 square feet and comply with Zoning Ordinance requirements. The lots are similar in size to the lots that were recently approved for the Berg Addition to the east. Lots 1 through 4 of the subdivision are arranged around a small cul -de -sac from Valley View Road. The fifth lot fronts on Valley View Road. The Community Development and Planning Commission reviewed the proposed subdivision at its meeting of June 27, 1984. Mr. Hughes pointed out that this plan is a modification of an earlier plan submitted by the property owner that called for a double dwelling unit development for the site. It was staff's recommendation that the rezoning to R -2 should be denied. The Commission felt the modified plan conformed to past direction given for the area and recommended approval of the subdivision conditioned upon: a) subdivision dedication, b) developer's agreement that would include the relocation of the existing storm sewer at the developer's. expense. No objections being heard, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL VALLEY VIEW 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Valley View 2nd Addition ", platted by PKR Development Company and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of July '16, 1984, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, subject to subdivision dedication and execution of a developer's agreement. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Subdivision No. :5- ` -/ SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: LL&: '' , WE0 69/J6/ S G/0', A &brT /O�l% /3,q5OtX- 4o Z/,OW77 LAND SIZE: LO S ?67 ror�2_ LAND VALUL : (BY: 'Date: !� ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land B. dedicate % of the land EVE- donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. D5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. 2. 50 100 150 200 E IN FEET :)TES IRON MONUMENT / RINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 66- 120 N. W. CORNER OF TRACT A, �� R.L.S. No. 519 AO 1 / cs 9�2 �gZC, \O \ \y�� \2� \ 4 \ s `'o a 0 / a, O \ cI S °c o °o 2 \ i 46 q m /1� -J s�sp \D� /y 9� \ �o /fq0 t� ^a ^Qr1 °1 /`x0'00 °o / no ONO\N S0S 1— of 1 0 ��oewes� cot/ J�PO q0 ' tai o P oct IS -TS- AO t Ito SBMFN , g868 Tf` t` ^e TcI 9/ °e GS 0., -T 9. �n 'pe s co'ner °t a i i P � ^� w. i 08P\N RO o V° t �t`e s \o 9T \2 of O° �n9 tro e� e°s� ° 28 N1 t, ^e 5 e To^ TS le `^I 1� aON t90 \'�S \,ne ° \`p s�O ^1 _ V` v Drainage and Ut der 0°c. ° e' ' are shown thus: j6 ' ' 6 G 75.00 SBB °23'40 "E S. fine of Tract B W. corner of Tract B kJ t � n� '� tic �'�1�' rJ 10 ` Being 5 feet in width, � , and adjoining Ic `w feet in width and adjon as shown on the plat "PROPOSED FINAL PL 0 v- ..EY VIEW HEIGHTS 2ND ADDITION , 'NARY PLAT: ! _ r\ •m � _ 1 �I�O � � ` o 121 � �� 13► Valley View N t Road 14500 sq.ft. Sel eibacK 4 r 1 s a\a \ o Keiocaie Exisf;n� 3 �� 4000 sq.ft / 2 S +orm Sewer +o � i `I'``;� 68 \ Lo+ Line n ? i i \ `t_ J `� • � � 5�tbd�k S ` - '� �\ 16\,5\'90 sq.ft. � 21 100 sq.ft . N\\ t \ I \R \ � R �'0' 1 /� 2200 sq.ft N \ V \ — -� - - - _ New H1.H. cc jv 158 \ - `ER:s�: ^9 M.H. 165 171 CDt4FYT.Y AP /PROVED PRELIM. ,PLAT .i AiizL ... � ('..yuY�BiWA�IIN✓IYW' � w•hNld�17'. nJ�l,. . 62 'WI LLIA WARDWELL-: c i NUMBER 5 -83 -11 Replat of Lot 3, Block 3, Carolane Addition L O C A T 10 N Generally, South of 'Jest 70th Street and east of Lanham Lane REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT � W�■n i� ■.a: �N■n A11�-��a `�N� CAHILL ;ELEM SCHOOL two 'WI LLIA WARDWELL-: c i NUMBER 5 -83 -11 Replat of Lot 3, Block 3, Carolane Addition L O C A T 10 N Generally, South of 'Jest 70th Street and east of Lanham Lane REQUEST EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT t o►, %A ,9� PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR SVANOE REPLAT, LOT 3, BLOCK 3, CAROLANE ADDITION Affidavit of Notice was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes recalled that preliminary plat approval of the Svanoe Replat, generally located at 7013 Lee Valley Circle, had been considered by the Council on October 17 and November 7, 1983, for a subdivision of an existing single family lot that is improved with a dwelling on the easterly portion. At the latter meeting, it was referred back to the Community Development and Planning Commission because of concerns raised by surrounding property owners that, due to the shape of the new lot, a dwelling could be constructed to the rear of the property which would overlook the rear yards of the adjacent properties. It was suggested that a restric- tion be placed on the lot that would regulate the precise location of a new house on the property. The Planning Commission subsequently reviewed a proposal by the pro- ponent to restrict the lot whereby a house could not be constructed beyond a line --. drawn parallel with and 124 feet southwesterly of the front lot line in response to concerns of the neighbors. The Commission at its November 30, 1983, meeting recom- mended approval of the subdivision, subject to the proposed restriction and sub- division dedication. Mr. Hughes indicated that Don Patten, representing the propon- ents, was present to answer questions. Mr. Patten then presented graphics-of a proposed house to be built on the new lot that he felt would fit nicely within the proposed restriction and that would fall within the setbacks required by ordinance. He stated that the neighbors had been shown the plan at a meeting on November 21,. and requested approval of the subdivision as now proposed. William Smith, 7017 Lee Valley Circle, referred to his letter of October 28, 1983 in which proposed setbacks were stated and commented that he felt the setbacks in the plan now proposed are inconsistent with what was expected. Mr. Smith asked that the Council reconsider where the restriction line should be and reiterated his concern that the proposed subdivision will result in the loss of privacy he now enjoys and that it will be inconsistent with the current siting of homes in the neighborhood. Following dis- cussion on sideyard and rear yard setbacks, Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF SVANOE REPLAT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled " Svanoe Replat ", platted by William R.,and Myrtle A. Svanoe, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 19, 1983, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, subject to the condition that the owner execute and deliver to the City a declaration of restrictive covenants, in recordable form and otherwise in form and substance acceptable to the City, pro- hibiting construction of any house, porch or deck, on that part of the Westerly lot of Carolane Addition lying Southwesterly of a line drawn parallel with and 124 feet Southwesterly of the Northeasterly line of the lot. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Bredesen. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney Abstained: Schmidt Resolution adopted. vim FROM: SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission Planning Department {`V ' SUBDIVISION NAME: S A*� O E Rte' PLAN LAND SIZE: 17, 68 LAND (By Subdivision No. S' S3–)l X363 Date: The developer of this subdivision has been required to 0 A. grant an easement over part of the land B. dedicate % of the land ]—� C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. -04. If property is necessary, for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. n5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 11 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. El 2. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council ROM: Craig Swanson VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 16, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): (6) Full -Sized Sedans for Police usage Quotations /Bids: Company L Suburban Chevrolet $10,831.00 per vehicle 2. Thane - Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $10,886.00 per vehicle • Brookdale Ford Department Recommendation: $10,967.75 per vehicle zL r� Amount of Quote or Bid $64,986.00 $65,316.00 $65,806.50 Suburban Chevrolet Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is t,� is not within the amount budget for the purchase. /Lh_1 _X7� J. N. Dalen, Finance Director city MM ager's Endorsement: V 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department p t and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: neth Rosland, /City Manager RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR SVANOE ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled " Svanoe Addition ", platted by William R. Svanoe and Myrtle A. Svanoe, husband and wife, owners and proprietors and Richfield Bank and Trust Company, a Minnesota corporation, mortgagee, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1984, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of November, 1984. City Clerk RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR VALLEY VIEW HEIGHTS 2NE ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Valley View Heights 2nd Addition ", platted by Kent P. Swanson and Sharon J. Swanson, husband and wife, and Paul C. Kingbay and Carol E. Kingbay, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of November 19, 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 19th day of November, 1984. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 19, 1984, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. City Clerk REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: '!ayor and City Council FROM: Craig Swanson VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: November 16, 1984 Material Description (General Specifications): (6) Full -Sized Sedans for Police usage Quotations /Bids: Company 1• Suburban Chevrolet $10,831.00 per vehicle 2. Thane - Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $10,886.00 per vehicle I Brookdale Ford Department Recommendation: $10,967.75 per vehicle Amount of Quote or Bid $64,986.00 $65,316.00 $65,806.50 Suburban Chevrolet Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is t,� is not within the amount budget for the purchase. i /L . N. Dalen, Finance Director C�ityyMM ager's Endorsement: V ►� 1. I concur with the recommendation of the D the purchase. epartment and recommend Council approve 2. I recommend as an alternative: nneth Rosland,/Citfy Manager t MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 13, 1984 9:00 A.M. Members present: Fran Hoffman,.Chairman Gordon Hughes Lois Coon Craig Swanson Members absent: Alison Fuhr Others present: Kathleen,Hvass Sanberg, 4617 Arden Ave. So. Gene Kragness, 5712 W. 70th St. Edwin W. Carlson., 5716 W. 70th St. Robert Wilcox, 7009 Gleason Rd. Capt. Len Kleven, Edina Police Dept. CCrTTnlkl A 1. Request for speed control and warning signs on Gleason Road near Scotia Drive. Request made by Mr. Robert Wilcox, 7009 Gleason Road. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Wilcox expressed concern over motorists driving too fast for conditions on the portion of Gleason Road,south of Valley View Road, particularly in the Scotia Drive area. His concern are the downhill grade and curves in the area in,which motorists tend to drive too fast, lose control, and end up in neighbors yards. Mir. Hoffman reported that he had,rechecked the road curves to determine if,they met design standards and indeed they did. Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee.,recommend additional curve and advisory speed signs to attempt`to heighten driver awareness of the area. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for speed control on West 70th Street at and near the 5700 Block. Request made by Mr. Gene R. Kragness, 5712 West 70th Street. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 2 . November 13, 1984 ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Kragness reported his observations and opinions regarding traffic on West 70th Street as a resident of the..area.. Hi,s primary concern is for the safety of children which.is threatened by traffic along the roadway traveling at excessive speed. He reports identifiable times of the day and_:identifiable groups of,motorists as causing,the problem. Rush hours and school dismissal times are.of most concern.. Students, workers, and "short- cut - takers" are violating groups. Mr. Kragness stated that the police only enforce speed laws infrequently. He suggests a higher level of enforcement during peak periods of traffic violations to include multi - police car saturation. Mr. Carlson cited several one -car property damages accidents along West 70th Street which he attributes to,speeding. Capt. Kleven informed the committee of enforcement activity.along West,70th,Street. Twenty three periods of radar,enforcement have been conducted yielding the issuance of 121 citations. He stated that as much or more enforce- ment is directed to West 70th Street than almost any other area with- in the city. Other areas in the city dictate enforcement action also based on accidents. Capt. Kleven stated there is an.insufficient resource to provide saturation patrols. Mr. Hughes moved that the committee communicate with the Edina School.. District (Students and bus driver),,. ARA Transportation, and other identifiable users of the roadway to encourage lower speeds and the promotion of safety. Mr. Swanson.seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. 2. Request for "Stop" signs at.Country Club Road and Arden. Avenue. Request made by Ms. Kathleen.Sanberg., 4617 Arden Avenue. ACTION TAKEN: Ms. Sanberg explained what she and several neighbors (via petition) are concerned about on Arden Avenue. The major concern..expressed was the amount of traffic using the street as a "shortcut ". Police radar surveys ,a very normal.traffic..speed distribution for a local street with 96.5% of all motorists,traveling under 35 MPH. Additional concerns by the residents include; the lack of defined right -of -way at Country Club Road and Arden Avenue, the numbers of new families with small children, and apparent reckless driving by some individuals. Mr. Hoffman reported actions on previous control requests for this intersection and suggested that an original /destination study be done to determine if Arden traffic is "local" in nature versus "commuter" traffic. Traffic Safety Committee Mi.nutes Page 3 November 13, 1984 Mrs. Coon recommended.that an original /destination study be done on Arden and that the results be reported at the December meeting. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, Edina Traffic Safety Committee M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: MLC JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT DATE:- September 17, 1984 It is requested that the Council ratify the following amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement. The 1985 Budget Proposal contains funds to cover the increase. KR /sw XI. FINANCIAL MATTERS Section 2. The financial contributions of the Parties in support of the Commission shall be per capita. Each of the Parties shall pay to the Commission an amount as annually determined by the Commission not to exceed $9 -25 $0.35 per capita by February 15, of each year based _on the most recent Metropolitan Council population estimates, however, no individual municipality shall contribute more than $-107999 $14,0 0 per year. This amount may be used by the Commission to pay all legal and consultant costs and expenses and other expenses as approved by the Board. The Board may authorize changes in the.per capita charge for all members upon majority vote. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney and Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: 1985 HOLIDAYS DATE: November 5, 1984 Unless otherwise provided for by contract, the following dates are proposed as holidays for 1985. City Hall would be closed on these days: January 1 February 18 April 5 May 27 July 4 September 2 November 11 November 28 November 29 December 24 i2 day December 25 December 31 12 day New Year's Day Presidents' Day Good Friday Memorial Day Independence Day Labor Day Veterans' Day Thanksgiving Friday after Thanksgiving Christmas Eve Day Christmas Day New Year's Eve Day This is a total of eleven holidays, which is no change from the previous years. KR /sw l 5" Ake 5 t' IIL association of e t opolitan municipalities MEETING NOTICE November 9, 1984 TO: AMM Member Cities (Mayors, Managers /Administrators) FROM: Ronald J. Backes, AMM President General Meeting of the AMM Membership to Consider and Adopt AMM Legislative Policies for 1985 Date: Thursday, December -6, 1984 Time: 7:30 P.M. Location: Richfield City hall Council Chambers 6700 Portland Ave. Richfield, Minnesota Agenda 1. Call to order. 2. Announcements and review of voting procedures. 3. Consideration and Adoption of the AMM's proposed 1985 Legislative Policies as recommended by the Legislative Policy Committees and as approved by the Board of Directors. 4. Other business. 5. Adjournment. PLEASE.NOTE: A. Copies of the proposed Legislative the mailing to the Managers /Admini that they be distributed to Mayors B. We would hope that every city representatives in attendance meeting. Policies are included in strators and we would ask and Councilmembers. would have one or more at this very important 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 association of metropolitan municipalities November 7, 1984 Dear Local Official: The attached policies have been recommended by the five AMM standing committees and Board of Directors for adoption by the General Membership as AMM Legislative Policy for the 1985 -1986 Biennium. The General Membership meeting has been set for 7:30 P.M. at the Richfield City Hall, 6700 Portland Ave. on Thursday, December 6, 1984. This should give you and your council time to peruse and discuss the various policy recommendations. Policy adoption requires a two - thirds majority vote of those present. Each city has one vote except the more populated cities of Bloomington (2), Minneapolis (7), and St. Paul (5). We look forward to your active participation in this very important part of the AMM policy process. Respectfully, ?on B kes, President Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 r i f, 3. INDEX PART ONE MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXATION -i- PAGE NUMBER I. MUNICIPAL REVENUES A. LEVY LIMIT REPEAL 1 B. LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS 1 - 5 1. Realistic Levy Base 1 - 2 2. Commercial /Industrial Levy Base Growth 2 3. Reverse Referendum 2 4. Mandated State and Federal Programs 2 - 3 5. Decreased Non Tax Revenue Special Levy 3 6. Energy Special Levy 3 - 4 -- 7. Service Shifts - Levy Limit Review Board 4 8. Federal Revenue Sharing Replacement Funds 4 - 5 9. Natural Disaster and Lawful Order Special 5 Levy 10. FICA Base Adjustments 5 C. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID 5 - 6 D. PROPERTY TAX 6 - 8 1. Tax Exempt Property 6 2. Property Tax Distribution From County 6 - 7 3. Railroad Property Taxation 7 - 8 4. Unit Assessed Value For.Budgeting 8 5. Malting Structures Property Class 8 -i- II. l -L E. ASSESSMENT EQUALIZATION 8 - 10 1. Coefficient of Dispersion Penalty 9 - 10 2. Sales Ratio Equalization 10 .F. GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES 10 - 11 1. Tax Increment Financing 10 2. Fiscal Notes 10 - 11 3. Electronic Transfer of Funds 11 PART TWO GENERAL LEGISLATION GENERAL LEGISLATION 12 - 30 A. PELRA PROVISIONS 12 - 13 B. POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS 13 - 14 C. CABLE COMMUNICATIONS 14 - 16 D. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND 16 - 17 ALLOCATION E. OPPOSE MUNICIPAL BOND SALES CONTROL BY THE 1 -7 STATE F. PUBLIC'WORKS PROJECTS - DAY LABOR 17 G. OPPOSE STATE OR METROPOLITAN LICENSING OF 17 - 18 GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTORS H. UNIFORM BUILDING CODE 18 I. MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD 18 - 19 J. VETERANS PREFERENCE 19 K. EMPLOYEE DISABILITY - LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE 19 - 20 FUNDS -ii- T ■ L. POLICE OFFICER ELIGIBILITY AND RECRUITMENT 20 - 21 M. JUDICIAL SYSTEM 21 - 23 N. DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING 23 0. ONE CLASS OF BEER 23 P. OPPOSE INITIATIVE - REFERENDUM FOR ZONING 24 ORDINANCES Q. SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM 24 R. TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING 24 - 25 S. LIMIT NEW AUTHORITY FOR STATE AUDITOR 25 - 36 T. PERA BENEFITS, FINANCING, AND ADMINISTRATION 26 - 30 U. TORT LIABILITY LIMITS 30 V. EMPLOYEE TIME /DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS 30 PART THREE HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA III. HOUSING PROBLEM (INTRODUCTION) 31 - 36 A. EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS 32 B. MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING 32 C. PROGRAM LATITUDE 33 D. RENEWAL OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING 33 E. LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS - AUTHORITY/ 33 - 34 RESPONSIBILITY F. FINANCING HOUSING POLICIES. 34 G. PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS 34 H. RENTAL HOUSING 35 - 36 PART FOUR METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES AND CONCERNS -iii- IV. PHILOSOPHY, ISSUES, AND CONCERNS (INTRODUCTION). 37 - 54 A. PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL 37 - 38 AGENCIES B. CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF POWER 38 C. STRUCTURES, PLANNING, FUNDING - SERVICES/ 38 - 41 PROGRAMS D. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY 41 - 43 E. DEVELOPMENT IN ADJACENT COUNTIES 43 - 44 F. MINNESOTA INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW OF 44 - 45 FEDERAL PROGRAMS G. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 45 - 46 PROCESS H. COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND"REGIONAL 46 INTERACTION I. REZONING - FIRST CLASS CITIES 46'- 47 J. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET 47 _ 48 K. SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) 48 - 49 L. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING 49 - 50 M. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT 50 N. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT 50 - 51 0. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT 51 - 54 PART FIVE TRANSPORTATION V. TRANSPORTATION 55 - 62 A. MNDOT HIGHWAY FUNDING 55 -iv- C. REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) 55 - 56 D. HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES 56 - 57 E. STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS 57 - 58 F. '3C' TRANSPORTATION PROCESS 58 - 59 G. METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING 59 H. TAXI CAB REGULATIONS 59 - 60 I. LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES 60 - 61 J. CITY SPEED LIMITS 61 - 62 K. MNDOT /CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS 62 L. MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX 62 M. BIKEWAY FUNDING 62 -v- LEGISLATIVE POLICIES 1985 -1986 I MUNICIPAL REVENUE AND TAXATION I -A 5% LEVY LIMIT REPEAL The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities has consistently opposed the levy limit laws in that they apply uniform statewide restrictions to cities and are too inflexible to accommodate inflation, uncertanties in state and federal financial aids, and the diverse problems and circumstances faced by cities throughout the state. Such laws are inconsistent with principles of local self - government and accountability. Neither do they recognize changing local conditions as to either expenditure needs or revenue sources. Levy limits may ultimately work against the interests of local taxpayers because the law creates an incentive for cities to take maximum advantage of the opportunity to make general or special levies. For example, the arbitrary decision in 1981 to create a new levy limit base effectively penalized those cities that were successful in holding down their property tax levies in 1981. History has now provided cities with numerous lessons teaching that cities which choose to levy less than the maximum allowed in a given year risk being later tied to unrealistic or artifically low new limits for future budget years. Therefore, THE AMM REMAINS STRONGLY OPPOSED IN PRINCIPLE TO SUCH LIMITATIONS AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE MINNESOTA LEGISLATURE REPEAL LEVY LIMIT LAWS FOR CITIES. I -B LEVY LIMIT MODIFICATIONS Although the AMM is strongly opposed to Levy Limitations as currently legislated, the organization is aware that there is significant legislative initiative to maintain the responsibility for local property tax levels. However, local government must continue and be allowed to provide for services that people demand and that state and federal law require. Therefore, if repeal is not adopted, the Association supports amendments to the present levy limit law to provide further relief from current inequities. B -1 REALISTIC LEVY BASE The 1983 legislature restored the pre 1982 levy base formula of local government aids plus levy limit on which annual growth is calculated without regard to actual levy. This method provides that cities may levy less than the limit without losing the ability to regain the underlevy in future years. The legislature also provided growth based on an index rather than a flat percentage and growth increase for the greater of population or households and some base growth for commercial and industrial activity. All of these growth factors are necessary as a minimum -1- to allow cities the ability to at provisions for the varying population THE AMM SUPPORTS CONTINUED USE OF THE FACTORS AS A MINIMUM FOR FUTURE LEVY FINDS IT PHILOSOPHICALLY NECESSARY CITIES OVER 5000 POPULATION. least stay even with service needs. CURRENT LEVY BASE ADJUSTMENT YEARS IF THE LEGISLATURE TO CONTINUE LEVY.LIMITS FOR B -2 COMMERCIAL /INDUSTRIAL LEVY BASE GROWTH. The current levy limit law recognizes that increased houses and people require increased revenues to provide services. The law also recognizes that new commercial industrial expansion causes new city costs and therefore, provides a special levy for three years equal to the amount of revenue raised by applying the general mill levy to the increased value and provides one -half the special levy as a base increase at the end of three years. Without some growth factor, all services for new commercial and industrial property would have to be provided from existing revenue, thus reducing service to the remainder of the community. Without additional revenue to provide this service, considering metropolitan fiscal disparities, a very real disincentive exists for allowing any type of new or expanded commercial /industrial growth. Unfortunately, with only half the growth factor after fiscal disparities added to the base, city residents are subsidizing services to commercial /industrial , projects. Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO PROVIDE A 100% LEVY BASE INCREASE FOR NEW AND EXPANDED COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL GROWTH SO THAT SERVICES MAY BE PROVIDED WITHOUT DECREASING SERVICE TO THE EXISTING RESIDENTS OF THE CITY. B -3 REVERSE REFERENDUM The 1981 legislature eliminated the Reverse Referendum procedure which allowed a local governing body to increase its levy base by up to 10% if it was at 98% or more of the levy limit the previous year. The law restricted use to a one time 10% increase or up to 10% in multiple steps and public hearing procedures. The increase was subject to a referendum if a petition was presented containing signatures equal to 5% of the number of persons voting at the previous general.election. If no petition was received, the increase becomes effective. This provision provided a measure of flexibility for cities and counties that needed base increases for various reasons. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE RE -ENACT THE REVERSE REFERENDUM PROVISION TO ADD FLEXIBILITY FOR LOCAL UNITS. B -4 MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS. -2- The cost of local government is being influenced more and more by both state and federally legislated mandated programs and increased mandated benefits or costs for in -place programs. Due to current levy limitation restrictions, the ability of local government to pay these increased costs is severely restricted, thereby causing in many instances, a reduction in the level of the traditional service functions of police, fire, street, etc. There is a vast range of mandated program increases which have no bearing or relationship to the annually allowed levy limit increase. Some of these include worker's compensation benefits, binding arbitration, federal social security, minimum wage laws, comprehensive planning, Critical Areas Act, Shorelines Act, OSHA, etc. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RECOGNIZE THAT MANDATED INCREASED EXPENDITURES IN ONE PROGRAM WITHOUT A CORRESPONDING INCREASE IN FUNDING ABILITY MANDATES A DECREASED EXPENDITURE IN THE OTHER SERVICE AREAS SUCH AS PUBLIC SAFETY ETC., AND THEREFORE, WHEN SUCH INCREASES ARE MANDATED THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE A PERMANENT LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO OFFSET THE NEW COSTS. B -5 DECREASED NON TAX REVENUE SPECIAL LEVY The 1981 legislature eliminated the Decreased Non Tax Revenue special levy by rolling the 1981 actual levy into the levy base. The primary purpose of this special levy was to provide -a method on an annual basis to recapture revenue decreases -.in, prinicipally, municipal liquor store operations using the current year as a comparison to 1971 revenues modified by inflation. When the Levy Limit law was initiated in 1971, it did not consider that a major share of some cities general budget revenue . was derived from the liquor store revenue. Since 1971 these revenues or profits have remained constant or in many cases actually declined, thus causing severe problems because levy increases were only based on actual 1971 property tax levy. The decreased non tax revenue special levy was initiated in 1973 and modified in 1980 to remedy this problem. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RE- INSTATE THE DECREASED NON TAX REVENUE SPECIAL LEVY USING 1981 AS A BASE YEAR TO MORE ACCURATELY REFLECT THE CURRENT INCREASE OR DECREASE FROM MUNICIPAL ENTERPRISES SUCH AS LIQUOR STORES. B -6 ENERGY SPECIAL LEVY There has been a.tremendous interest in energy related issues and developing methods of saving energy in the past few years. It is recognized that fuel conservation measures are necessary and, in fact, federal and state legislation has been passed requiring certain energy saving measures. Cities are required to make -3- facility energy audits which are basically paid for through energy grants. However, facility changes and capital expenditures, some required and others that make sense, must be implemented using local revenues. In many cases these revenues are not available because of levy limitations. Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ENACT A SPECIAL LEVY TO PAY FOR COSTS INCURRED FOR ENERGY IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING REPAIRS AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES. B -7 SERVICE SHIFTS -LEVY LIMIT REVIEW BOARD Due to diminishing state funding of county and city services and tightening levy limits, all units of local government have been modifying service procedures and increasing revenues where possible. For many years some counties have provided services to cities on 'a contract basis for police, prosecution,- jailing, assessing, etc. In order to free up funds for other services, some counties have been shifting a much larger burden of cost for these.services to the city at a much greater increase than 5 or 6 %. An actual prime example of this is as follows: One county has done the assessing for all units within the county on a contract basis for one dollar per year. This cost has been funded within the county levy base. However, for 1983 the county charged actual costs to the local units, as high as $28,000 for one city. The city has the option to pay or hire its own assessor. It can do neither because its base does not include any funds for this purpose. Because of the law the county can free up that base levy to be used for other purposes. This type of activity is more common where cities contract with the county sheriff for police service and have no control over cost increases. THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RE- ESTABLISH A LEVY LIMIT BASE -REVIEW BOARD AND AUTHORIZE THE BOARD TO ADJUST CITY LEVY BASES FOR SERVICE SHIFTS AND EXCESS COST INCREASES• FOR CITY /COUNTY CONTRACT SERVICES SUCH AS POLICE, PROSECUTION, JAILING, ASSESSING, ETC., WHEN IT CAN BE SHOWN THAT IT IS A NEW COST TO THE CITY OR A COST INCREASE IN EXCESS OF THE STANDARD LEVY BASE INCREASE. B -8 FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING REPLACEMENT FUNDS Since 1972 the cities in Minnesota have become more and more dependent upon Federal Revenue Sharing. Currently almost all cities are using some or all of their revenue sharing allocation for normal general operating expenses, and many of these same cities are at, or near, levy limits. If Federal Revenue Sharing is either discontinued or reduced, currently there is no alternative method to raise revenue to replace the loss. In some cases the resulting cuts in service will be a definite threat to the general, health, welfare, and safety of many of our city -4- residents. Therefore, THE AMM REQUESTS THAT THE LEGISLATURE ENACT A PROVISION IN THE LEVY LIMIT STATUTES TO PROVIDE A LEVY LIMIT BASE INCREASE TO REPLACE ANY FUNDS LOST THROUGH REDUCTION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING TO CITIES. B -9 SPECIAL LEVY - NATURAL DISASTER AND LAWFUL ORDER The 1977 Legislature eliminated a number of special levies, including those for expenditures of funds as a result of natural disasters and lawful orders, neither of which a city can plan for or has any control over. Lawful orders are a result of not being able to implement some state or federal regulation. Natural disasters, such as the 1977 and 1978 heavy rains which caused severe flooding in the metropolitan area, can cause unnatural large expenditures for emergency repair to city facilities. Neither of these are used often, but when needed are absolutely necessary. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REINSTATE THE SPECIAL LEVIES FOR LAWFUL ORDERS AND NATURAL DISASTERS. B -10 FICA BASE ADJUSTMENTS Normally FICA - Social Security Withholding - is .. directly proportional to payroll. However, in recent years the-employer contribution percentage and amount of salary FICA is paid on,-has increased drastically, well above inflation rates. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE ENACT A LEVY BASE INCREASE PROVISION TO ALLOW FOR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE NORMAL LEVY BASE INCREASE ALLOWED BY THE LEVY LIMITATION LAW AND THE FICA INCREASE MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. I -C LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID Local Government Aid distribution from the State to cities has been a much debated issue the past several years in the legislature and among various city groups. In the past 16 years the distribution has ranged from a pure per capita formula to a need formula based on valuation and service expenditure level. Possibly because of the distribution debate or because aids to local government are easy targets, the legislature significantly reduced its commitment to the aid programs and property tax relief in the early 1980's to solve a major portion of the severe economic recession in the state. Thus for a period of time, property taxes increased significantly to replace diminished state revenue to local units of government without corresponding local service increases. Now that the recession has ended, economic recovery is occuring and state revenues are increasing, it is time -5- for the state to renew its commitment to maintaining a reasonable level of property taxes and local services by once again funding local government aid programs. Although, the debate will undoubtedly continue as to the appropriate formulas for distribution-of aids because of the vast difference in cities within the state, the legislature should not abrogate its authority nor lose sight of the overall need to maintain stable and reasonable property tax levels. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RENEW THE COMMITMENT TO ALL LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OF REASONABLE PROPERTY TAXES BY INCREASING ITS FUNDING OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID PROGRAMS ON AS FAIR AND EQUITABLE BASIS AS POSSIBLE. THE LEGISLATURE MAY NEED TO CONSIDER ADDITIONAL NEW AND CREATIVE METHODS OF SOLVING UNIQUE LOCAL FUNDING PROBLEMS SEPARATELY FROM THE GENERALIZED FORMULAS. I -D PROPERTY TAX D -1 TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves the free local services that are provided to tax exempt property owned by the state and by certain non - governmental organizations. It is widely acknowledged that such property benefits directly from governmental services such as police and fire protection and street services provided by cities and counties. However, since .there is not legal basis for claiming reimbursement for the cost of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers. Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain cities and counties resulting in a heavy cost burden in certain parts of the state. THE ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY ENACTING LEGISLATION REQUIRING BOTH THE STATE AND NON- GOVERNMENTAL OWNERS OF TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR CHURCHES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP, AND PROPERTY USED SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES BY ACADEMIES, .COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES AND SEMINARIES OF LEARNING, TO REIMBURSE CITIES AND COUNTIES FOR THE COST OF POLICE, FIRE, AND STREET SERVICES. THAT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ALSO CONSIDER PROVIDING REIMBURSEMENT FOR THESE SERVICES FOR ALL STATE OWNED FACILITIES, INCLUDING STATE UNIVERSITIES. D -2 PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION FROM COUNTY Counties are supposed to distribute 70% of the collected property tax funds on hand as of the 20th. day of the month following collection date within 30 days and the remainder within 60 days with 8% interest accruing after 45 days. Cities may request and receive an early payment. Some of the Metropolitan Counties are not forwarding the special assessment collection portion upon early request nor are the delinquent tax collections forwarded on a uniform and timely basis. Recently, the legislature modified school payments by requiring 70% distribution within 7 working days and the remainder within 14 working days of, the settlement date. Ironically, the first half property tax payment is at the beginning of school districts fiscal year, whereas, many cities have had to borrow operating funds at market interest to cover costs for the first 6 months of operation. It is not practical nor possible in most cases for cities to accumulate enough reserve funds to cover normal costs from January 1 through June 20. THE AMM .URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION PROCESS FROM COUNTIES SO THAT CITIES ARE TREATED EQUAL TO SCHOOL DISTRICTS BY REQUIRING AT LEAST 70% OF ALL FUNDS ON HAND AS OF THE SETTLEMENT DATE,INCLUDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS,TO BE PAID WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AND THE REMAINDER PAID WITHIN 14 WORKING DAYS. ANY INTEREST EARNED BY THE COUNTY WHILE HOLDING THE FUNDS SHOULD ALSO BE DISTRIBUTED. FURTHER, THE LAW SHOULD CLARIFY THE PROCESS FOR DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX COLLECTIONS SO THAT THESE FUNDS ARE NOT HELD BUT FORWARDED WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD AFTER COLLECTION WITH ANY INTEREST ACCRUED BY THE COUNTY D -3 RAILROAD PROPERTY TAXATION The existing system for taxation of railroad operating property is not consistent with the taxation of other commercial'-and industrial properties. The present formula values railroad operating property at about 20% of the value which would be determined by a -local assessor using generally accepted assessing principles. The AMM recommends that a new system of property taxation be established which enable railroads operating in Minnesota to be taxed consistent with the taxation of other commercial and industrial properties. This system should contain the following features: A NEW FORMULA SHOULD BE DEVELOPED FOR THE VALUATION OF RAILROAD OPERATING PROPERTY FOR PROPERTY TAX PURPOSES. THE NEW FORMULA SHOULD CONTAIN TWO EQUAL FACTORS. ONE OF THESE FACTORS SHOULD BE FIFTY PERCENT OF AN AMOUNT BASED UPON: THE AVERAGE VALUE OF ALL OF THE TAXABLE LAND IN THE CITY OR COUNTY TIMES THE AREA OF THE RAILROAD OPERATING LAND PLUS THE VALUE OF RAILROAD.OPERATING STRUCTURES AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL ASSESSOR. THE OTHER FACTOR WOULD BE AN AMOUNT BASED ON EITHER THE STOCK AND DEBT OF THE RAILROAD OR THE CAPITALIZATION OF EARNINGS APPROACH. 'OPERATING LAND' IS DEFINED TO MEAN OPERATING STRUCTURES DEFINED BELOW THERETO AND WHICH IS NECESSARY TO RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES. -7- ANY LAND WHICH UNDERLIES THE AND RIGHTS -OF -WAY ADJACENT THE INTEGRAL PERFORMANCES OF "OPERATING STRUCTURES" IS DEFINED TO MEAN ALL STRUCTURES OWNED OR USED BY A. RAILROAD COMPANY IN THE PERFORMANCE OF RAILROAD TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, FRANCHISES, BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, SHOPS, DOCKS, WHARVES, BUILDINGS AND OTHER RELATED STRUCTURES. ALL OPERATING STRUCTURES EXCEPT RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TRACKS, DOCKS AND WHARVES, SHOULD BE TAXABLE. THE PRESENT SYSTEM FOR VALUING AND TAXING NON- OPERATING PROPERTY SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED. NO TAXING JURISDICTION SHOULD LOSE REVENUE BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE FROM THE EXISTING UNIT VALUE SYSTEM TO THE NEW LOCAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. D -4 UNIT ASSESSED VALUE FOR BUDGETING Due to fluctuating or decreasing state aids and credits and increasing assessed values in property it is difficult for local units to judge the impact of budget decisions on individual property taxes. Only one or two counties in the Metropolitan Area provide a close estimate of local units total assessed values in time for use during the local budget process. THE AMM URGES THE METROPOLITAN COUNTIES TO PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS WITH AT LEAST A CLOSE ESTIMATE OF TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE OF THAT UNIT BY AUGUST 1ST. FOR USE DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS. D -5 MALTING STRUCTURES PROPERTY CLASS Recently a_Minnesota Tax Court decision declared that portions of the structures used in the process of converting grain into malt were attached machinery and therefore exempt from real property taxation. The impact of this decision on property taxes in certain areas with a concentration of malting operations is significant. In addition the AMM is concerned that based on this precedent the courts could extend the exemption to any structure specifically designed for warehousing certain goods or commodities such as grain elevators. The legislature has specifically designated electric generating plants and equipment as real property subject to property taxes. Therefore, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO SPECIFICALLY DESIGNATE ALL STRUCTURES USED IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING MALT FROM GRAIN AS WELL AS STRUCTURES USED FOR STORAGE AND DRYING GRAIN TO BE REAL PROPERTY SUBJECT TO PROPERTY TAXATION. I -E ASSESSMENT EQUALIZATION M Unequal property assessment, both within and among the various taxing jurisdictions, has been a concern of the legislature in past sessions due to overlapping tax levies by.county, school and various special districts. For various aid formulas, the state has utilized sales ratios as an offsetting equalizing factor so that distribution of aids will be accomplished on as fair and equitable basis as possible. The legislature has also adopted a penalty provision effective in 1986 based on coefficient of dispersion which is calculated from the sales ratio and has discussed penalty provisions based on the sales ratio itself. However, sales ratios individually and collectively are inherently flawed,, inaccurate, and at best are only general indicators. Many factors not associated with actual value of a piece of property can affect the sales price of that property. A farmer may buy a 40 or 80 acre parcel for well over 'market value' as an add on to a current farm and justify the cost by spreading the extra expense over the entire farm. A person with a very large downpayment or access to good financing may be able to purchase a house with a very low or non - existant underlying mortgage well under the 'market value'. On the other hand, someone with very limited downpayment may pay well over the market rate for a house with a high underlying assumable mortgage. Many other economic and personal reasons may enter into purchase price of property. Also, in many cases there just are not enough sales in a' class of property to accurately determine a sales ratio in a given geographic area. Finally, to keep ratios from constantly jumping up or down from year to year and to level out statistically the activity, the Revenue Department disregards some sales that are out of line for various reasons and uses two year samples to create a ratio. At best, sales ratios and various statistics such as the coefficient of disperson are only general indicators. They are tools to be used to determine cases of inconsistancy and provide a basis for constructive help to assessors. Imprecise sales ratios are generally in the ball park and computed in such a way as to be consistantly imprecise for all units. Therefore, as just one of several factors in aid formulas, they may be a necessary ingredient to provide as uniformly as possible an equitable distribution. However, because sales ratios and coefficient of disperson measurements are imprecise and were basically developed as tools to determine general trends, they should not be used as precision measurements for penalties or bonuses. E -1 COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSON PENALTY THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REPEAL THE COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION PENALTY PROVISION.IF THE LEGISLATURE DETERMINES A NEED EXISTS, THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHOULD BE MANDATED TO ORDER A REASSESSMENT OF AN AREA BY AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR IF THE COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION INDICATORS FALLS TO SOME LEVEL BELOW NATIONAL STANDARDS OF ACCEPTABILITY. THE COSTS OF SUCH -9- REASSESSMENT SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE RESPONSIBLE ASSESSING JURISDICITON. E -2 SALES RATIO EQUALIZATION Whereas, taxing units in the seven - county metropolitan area are subject (1) to certain area -wide levies and (2) to Fiscal Disparity allocations, it is necessary to ensure tax equalization among these various tax units. In 1984 the legislature authorized the Revenue Department to study new methods of calculating sales ratios by including adjustments for financing, etc. AFTER THE SALES RATIO STUDIES ARE IMPROVED BY INCLUDING ALL FACTORS OF SALES THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENACT LEGISLATION WHICH MANDATES AT LEAST A 90% SALES RATIO FOR ALL CITIES WITHIN THE SEVEN - COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA, THE SALES RATIO SAMPLE TO BE EITHER DONE OR AUDITED BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE AND REQUIRING THAT THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHALL MAKE AGGREGATE INCREASE IN THOSE CITIES BELOW 90 %. THE SALES RATIO DETERMINATION FOR THESE PURPOSES TO BE MADE ON THE BASIS OF A 12- MONTH PERIOD SAMPLE, BEGINNING NO MORE THAN 18 MONTHS BEFORE THE ASSESSMENT DATE. THE AMM OBJECTS TO SALES RATIO BEING USED AS A BASIS FOR PENALTY OR BONUS OF STATE AID FUNDS. I -F GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT POLICIES F -1 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Tax increment financing has permitted many cities in various parts of the state to define and carry out rehabilitation, development, housing, and economic development projects on their own initiative. It represents the most feasible and effective legal strategy which is currently available to cities in preserving and improving the physical and economic environment in their communities. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT PRESENTLY NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES ARE NECESSARY AND RECOMMENDS THAT NO SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES BE MADE BY THE LEGISLATURE UNTIL THERE HAS BEEN SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE TO DETERMINE IF CHANGES ARE NEEDED. F -2 FISCAL NOTES Many laws are passed each year by the legislature which have a substantial effect on the financial viability of cities. Some of these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an obvious and direct effect which is often calculated and reported during the hearing process. However, many others, such as worker's compensation benefit increases, mandated activities, binding S00 arbitration and other labor related legislation, social programs, etc., are not viewed during the bill process as to the fiscal impact on cities. Due to the current restrictive levy limitation laws, many of these hidden costs are causing severe reductions in the standard services which must be provided by local units. THE STATE SHOULD ADOPT A POLICY OF "DELIBERATE RESTRAINT" ON ITS MANDATED PROGRAMS, INCLUDING A MANDATORY FISCAL NOTE IDENTIFYING LOCAL GOVERNMENT COSTS ON ANY NEW MANDATED PROGRAMS WHEN THEY ARE INTRODUCED IN THE LEGISLATURE, AND A STATEMENT OF COMPELLING STATEWIDE INTEREST TO ACCOMPANY ALL STATE MANDATES. F -3 ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS Currently Hennepin, Ramsey and Carver Counties may transfer payments from the county checking accounts directly to the school districts bank account. This eliminates mail or personal delivery delays, does not cost the county any interest loss since money is transferred from savings to checking as soon as warrants are issued, and does excelerate the local unit's earning power on the money by as much as three or four days. Any method of efficiency which not only saves money but increases local funds should be initiated. Therefore, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE ENACT LAW ENABLING ELECTRONIC TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM COUNTY TO CITY IN THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA TO PROVIDE EFFICIENT AND COST EFFECTIVE FUND TRANSACTIONS. -11- II. GENERAL LEGISLATION II -A MINNESOTA PUBLIC EMPLOYEE LABOR RELATIONS ACT ( PELRA) The AMM recommends that the following changes affecting cities be made. A -1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION Employees presently have a variety of grievance procedures available to them, including civil service systems, veterans preference, and the equal employment opportunity act. EMPLOYEES COVERED BY A PELRA AGREEMENT SHOULD BE ABLE TO SPECIFY WHICH PROCEDURE SHOULD BE USED BY THEM OR SPECIFY A DIFFERENT PROCEDURE IN THE AGREEMENT, THUS PRECLUDING AN EMPLOYEE FROM INVOKING TWO PROCEDURES FOR GRIEVANCE. A -2 IMPASSE RESOLUTION PELRA SHOULD BE AMENDED SO THAT THE EMPLOYEES MUST EXERCISE THEIR RIGHT TO STRIKE WITHIN 15 DAYS FOLLOWING THE EMPLOYEE'S REFUSAL TO ARBITRATE OR FORFEIT SUCH RIGHT. CURRENT TIME LINES SHOULD BE ELIMINATED. AUTHORITY TO DECLARE AN IMPASSE SHOULD REST SOLELY WITH THE MEDIATOR A -3 SUPERVISORS AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES WITH PUBLIC COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SUPERVISORS OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES SHOULD HAVE THEIR MANAGEMENT ROLE ACKNOWLEDGED AND HAVE THEIR STATUS LIMITED TO MEET AND CONFER. IN NO EVENT SHOULD SUPERVISORY OR CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES BE REPRESENTED BY AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION WHICH REPRESENTS THE NON- SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES THEY SUPERVISE. THE TERM 'SUPERVISORY' SHOULD BE AS PRESENTLY DEFINED UNDER PELRA FOR NON- ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEE SUPERVISORS. THE DEFINITION OF SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES SHOULD NOT BE FURTHER LIMITED. TO DO SO WOULD ESSENTIALLY PROVIDE THAT IN ALL BUT CITY MANAGER CITIES, NO EMPLOYEES COULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE SUPERVISORY EMPLOYEES FOR PURPOSES OF THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT LABOR RELATIONS ACT A -4 RIGHT TO STRIKE THE EXISTING CLASSIFICATION OF ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE ELIMINATED AND ALL EMPLOYEES ORGANIZED. UNDER PELRA GIVEN THE RIGHT TO STRIKE. WITHIN THE LIMITED RIGHT TO STRIKE, THE PUBLIC EMPLOYER WOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF EITHER REQUESTING ARBITRATION WITHIN A SPECIFIC TIME OR ALLOWING EMPLOYEES TO LEGALLY STRIKE. A -5 BINDING ARBITRATION -12- In the past several years, the legislature has modified the essential employee binding arbitration procedures by changing from conventional to issue by issue final offer, returning to conventional, and finally adopting a short time issue by issue final offer which has been challenged in court. A final resolution should be made to avoid the confusion caused by jumping from one to the other. Issue by issue final offer provides some advantages over conventional arbitration. In issue by issue final offer, the parties must negotiate in good faith and each arrive at a reasonable position on each issue or face an obvious loss of that issue, whereas in conventional, the final outcome is left solely to the judgement of an arbitrator whose knowledge of unique local conditions and financing may be somewhat limited. THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO ADOPT A SYSTEM OF ISSUE BY ISSUE FINAL BEST OFFER ARBITRATION FOR MUNICIPAL ESSENTIAL EMPLOYEES IN ORDER TO PROMOTE THE BEST OPPORTUNITY FOR NEGOTIATION IN GOOD FAITH BY BOTH PARTIES. A -6 PICKET LINES NO CITY EMPLOYEE SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO REFUSE TO CROSS THE PICKET LINES OF OTHER CITY EMPLOYEES. II -B POLICE AND FIRE PENSION PROVISIONS Local police and full time fire relief associations were phased out by the 1980 legislature, unless the local council opts to keep the relief association. All new employees will become part of the state police and fire PERA fund and the state will reimburse Local units for a portion of the unfunded liabi'.ity remaining in the local fund. Employee contributions were set at & %. However, the Legislative Retirement Commission has in the past established a general policy requiring public safety employees to pay 40% of the normal pension costs. These changes have greatly helped solve a most serious problem but a few minor adjustments are still necessary. The AMM believes that: B -1 PORTABILITY SOME FORM OF PORTABILITY INTO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO MEMBERS OF LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATIONS IF THEY TAKE A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN ANOTHER GOVERNMENTAL UNIT BEFORE THEIR PENSION BENEFITS ARE VESTED. THE PERA LAW SHOULD ALSO BE AMENDED TO PERMIT A MEMBER OF THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND TO CONTINUE PERA COVERAGE WHEN THE MEMBER TAKES A PUBLIC SAFETY POSITION IN A CITY WITH A LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION. -13- B -2 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT EVEN THOUGH THE EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT WAS SET AT 8 %,IN MANY FUNDS THIS IS NOT EQUIVALENT TO 40% OF THE NORMAL COST. THE AMM URGES THAT THE CONTRIBUTION LEVEL BE SET AT 40% OF THE NOVMAL COST OF FINANCING THE BENEFITS EVEN IF THIS AMOUNT EXCEEDS 8% OF 'BASE SALARY. ANY INCREASE IN BENEFITS FOR CURRENT EMPLOYEES INCLUDING ANY RESULTING DEFICIT, SHOULD BE FINANCED 50% BY THE EMPLOYING CITY AND 50% BY EMPOYEES ON A CURRENT BASIS. II -C CABLE COMMUNICATIONS Nearly all of the cities in the Metropolitan Area have formed single or joint powers Cable Service Territories (CST) as have many of the cities in Minnesota outside the Twin City Area. The franchising process in progress in these areas range from totally served to under construction to preparing RFP's for bids. Based on recent court decisions and pending Federal Legislation,it appears that much of the control cities had in cable franchising, rates, and the cable product is being eliminated or transferred to the FCC and market place. However, the basic franchising process and issues related to system interconnects and regional channel still remain state and local issues. C -1 CABLE FRANCHISE PROCESS Minnesota statutes provide a reasonable and flexible set of- guidelines for municipalities to establish cable service territories even in a changing federal environment. THE AMM BELIEVES THIS LAW HAS ALLOWED LOCAL COMMUNITIES TO PROVIDE INPUT INTO AN IMPORTANT COMMUNITY SERVICE AND THAT IT SHOULD NOT BE MODIFIED TO DIMINISH LOCAL CONTROL. C -2 METROPOLITAN REGIONAL CHANNEL NEEDS The 1973 legislature mandated a uniform regional channel be set aside, an entity to schedule programs and facilitate use of the channel be designated, and the cable board should prescribe rules for its operation and practice which shall insure that priority be given to public use of the channel. To date, minimal 'needs analysis' has been done to determine what type of programming should be provided or even if there is a real need or desire on the part of the general public as it relates to the cost of providing a regional channel capability. It may be that after definitive analysis there is not sufficient justification, even in light of some of the special interest activists claims, for a regional channel as mandated and that the proper action might be to attempt to repeal the mandate. -14- THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENSURE THAT A DETAILED NEEDS AND USE ANALYSIS BE COMPLETED TO DETERMINE THE JUSTIFICATION FOR A REGIONAL CHANNEL AND THE TYPE OF PROGRAMMING THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED PRIOR TO EXPENDING SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF PUBLIC FUNDS. C -3 REGIONAL CHANNEL FUNDING AND ORGANIZATION If after thorough study, it is determined to proceed with development of a regional channel, then certain criteria should be adhered to as well as some problems resolved. A major controversary exists as to the appropriate funding mechanism for regional channel programming. Many options exist including a subscriber fee, a portion of local franchise fees, a program generator fee, a general metropolitan property tax, or state reimbursement for a state mandate. Very little study has been done to identify which of these or what combination is truly the fairest and most equitable. The structure and creator of a program entity could take many forms. The form chosen may in fact dictate the type of programming, the financing, and the degree of general public benefit or interest. There is also the question of domination by a single segment of society or type of agency which needs consideration. The State Cable Board has designated a planning group composed of representatives from nearly all segments, public and private, that have some interest in the regional channel. This group is meeting to resolve the above issues. As a guide to the working group, the State Cable Board, and to possible legislation, the AMM recommends that the following be considered: FUNDING SHOULD INITIALLY BE APPROPRIATED BY THE LEGISLATURE FROM A PORTION OF THE 6% SALES TAX REVENUES FROM CABLE SALES TO SUBSCRIBERS SINCE THIS IS A NEW SOURCE OF FUNDS TO THE STATE AND WOULD ENSURE THAT THOSE RECEIVING THE SERVICE ARE PAYING FOR THE SERVICE, THE EXPECTED COST OF $250,000 IS LESS THAN 10% OF THE NEW SALES TAX REVENUE TO BE GENERATED IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA IN THE NEXT YEAR. CONTINUING FUNDING SHOULD BE FROM THE STATE SALES TAX IN CONJUNCTION WITH CONSIDERATION OF SOME FEES OR CHARGES TO THE VARIOUS GROUPS BROADCASTING ON THE REGIONAL CHANNEL. PROPERTY TAX AND FRANCHISE FEES SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS FUNDING ALTERNATIVES. THE REGIONAL CHANNEL ENTITY SHOULD BE A 'NOT FOR PROFIT' ORGANIZATION SIMILAR TO CURRENT PUBLIC TV AND RADIO WITH A BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPRESENTING AND APPOINTED BY THE VARIOUS USER INTERESTS INCLUDING MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES. IF THIS PREFERRED ORGANIZATION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, THAN THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD CONSIDER CREATION OF A COMMISSION WITH APPOINTMENT BY THE -15- VARIOUS USER INTERESTS INCLUDING MUNICIPAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES. THE REGIONAL CHANNEL SHOULD PROVIDE PROGRAMMING OF BROAD REGIONAL INTEREST VERSUS NARROW SPECIAL INTERESTS AND NOT ATTEMPT TO COMPETE WITH CURRENT COMMERCIAL CHANNELS. PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE FOR A THOROUGH OVERSIGHT STUDY, AFTER A REASONABLE TEST PERIOD, TO DETERMINE THE LONG TERM VIABILITY AND NEED OF THE REGIONAL CHANNEL CONSIDERING AT LEAST SUBSCRIBER USE AND COST EFFECTIVENESS. C -4 CABLE SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION. Ultimately, provision will be made to interconnect the various cable service territories and systems in the metropolitan area. The Metropolitan Councils Advisory. Committee on Telecommunications has recommended the formation of a commission of Cable Service Territory Commissions to effect this interconnection which is technically complex and does involve issues within the individual franchise agreements. THE AMM SUPPORTS FORMATION OF A COMMISSION OF CABLE SERVICE TERRITORY COMMISSIONS TO FACILITATE THE ULTIMATE OVERALL INTERCONNECTION OF THE VARIOUS CABLE SYSTEMS IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA. II -D INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT REVENUE BOND ALLOCATION In 1984, the Federal Government adopted various restrictions in the use of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds which included a $150 per capita cap for each state per year through 1986 and then $100 per capita for 1987. The allocation for Minnesota equalled approximately $600 million per year. In response, the State Legislature adopted an allocation program for 1984 and 1985 which dedicates $95.million to the state, $404 million to entitlement cities issuing at least an average of $1 million in three of the last four years, and $101 million for non entitlement city use. Any amounts not issued or committed by August 31 will revert to the non entitlement pool. A 19 point project criteria was developed to judge applications to the non entitlement pool. However, some of the points seem redundent, skewed to larger cities, and not project oriented, thus making it difficult for small non entitlement cities to compete, even with good projects. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CAREFULLY REVIEW THE 1984 IDR BOND STATUES TO ENSURE A FAIR AND EQUITABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR ALL MINNESOTA CITIES - TO UTILIZE THIS FUNDING MECHANISM FOR ECONOMIC AND JOB CREATION GROWTH. SPECIFICALLY THE REVIEW SHOULD EXAMINE THE ALLOCATION FORMULA, THE STATUTORY CRITERIA FOR PROJECTS, ENTITLEMENT JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS, AND BOND SALES TIME LINES. FURTHER, THE AMM WOULD SUGGEST THAT VARIOUS -16- INTERESTED AGENCIES AND CITIES BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROCESS AND PROVIDE INPUT TO THE FINAL FORMULA FOR FUTURE YEARS. II -E OPPOSE MUNICIPAL BOND SALES CONTROL BY THE STATE Legislation proposed in previous sessions would have made the State Attorney General Bond Counsel for all municipal bonds and placed authority for selling all bonds with the State Investment Board. This could lead to increased bond costs and lengthy delays in bond issuance. The AG office does not have the professional competency to be recognized by bond buyers and would need years and a great deal of money to develop the competency necessary to eliminate a dual opinion from the private sector. This would also be a step in the direction of government bureaucracy taking over a function of private enterprise which is competent and is working at a time when the public trend is demanding less government instead of more. THE AMM OPPOSES ANY LEGISLATION MAKING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BOND COUNSEL AND /OR THE STATE INVESTMENT BOARD SALES AGENT FOR MUNICIPAL BOND SALES. FURTHER, IF THE LEGISLATURE PURSUES THIS ISSUE, THEY SHOULD UNDERTAKE A DETAILED STUDY PRIOR TO ANY LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO DETERMINE NEED, EFFECTIVENESS, AND COST. II -F PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS - DAY LABOR Under the Local Improvement Code, a $5,000 limitation is established and if the cost of an improvement is estimated to exceed this amount, the city is required to advertise for bids for the improvement. However, there is no similar limitation for improvements which are not financed by special assessments. Since many cities use their own employees to construct, remodel,or alter city owned property and perform construction, repair and maintenance on city streets, roads, bridges, and utilities, and do not specially assess these improvements to any benefited property owner, the existing law does not apply to them. The cost- - of preparing specifications and various reports for bids on these types of projects would probably outweigh any potential cost savings by using private enterprise to perform these functions. Also, by requiring use of the 'prevailing wage rate', all public works costs could be increased causing higher property taxes. THE PROVISIONS SUFFICIENT TO EXPENDITURES SO THESE ACTIVITIES DAY LABOR BY CIT: NOT BE ENACTED. OF THE UNIFORM MUNICIPAL CONTRACTING LAW ARE ENSURE EFFECTIVE CONTROL OF PUBLIC FUNDS THAT FURTHER MODIFICATION OF STATUES REGULATING ARE NOT NECESSARY. LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF [ES FOR THE DOING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD II -G OPPOSE STATE OR METROPOLITAN LICENSING OF GENERAL TRADE -17- CONTRACTORS Licensing of general trade contractors and various other activities has long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism for license review, issuance, and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing has been successful and, therefore, maintained at the local level, is that inspection and enforcement personnel reside at the local level, know the area and activities, and are familiar with local ordinance and restrictions, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Suggestions have been made to form a statewide or metropolitan wide licensing authority and split the revenue among the licensing agency and various municipalities with the municipalities maintaining enforcement tasks. It is questionable under this arrangement, if either the agency or municipalities would have enough funds to accomplish the respective tasks. In these times of economic stress it does not seem logical to increase participation in an area that has and is being handled effectively at the local level. Therefore, THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES STATE OR METROPOLITAN TAKEOVER OF GENERAL TRADE CONTRACTOR AND OTHER ASSOCIATED TRADE CONTRACTOR LICENSING. II -H UNIFORM BUILDING CODE The 1979 Legislature virtually eliminated the use of the - mandatory uniform State Building code in outstate Minnesota by providing adoption by referendum on a county basis. Where elections have been held, defeat has been overwhelming. The code has been in effect in the 7 county metropolitan area for several years__ and has been accepted and appears to be working as intended. Some cities would like to see the standards increased, but recognize the necessity of a uniform code and have no major objections to its use. In fact, even though some legislators have discussed elimination of its use in the metropolitan area, there does not seem to be any objections to its use from public, bodies, the private sector, or general citizenry. THE AMM STRONGLY OPPOSES ELIMINATION OF A MANDATORY STATE BUILDING CODE IN THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA. II -I MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD Since its organization, the Minnesota Municipal. Board has strengthened municipal government by providing a means for the orderly and intelligent 'evaluation of proposed incorporations, consolidations and annexations throughout the state. Recent additions and changes in the commission's authority in annexation and consolidation areas will encourage and foster an assessment of the consequences for governmental framework of certain kinds of development and services in urbanizing fringe areas around cities. THE AMM REQUESTS THAT NO FURTHER CHANGES BE MADE IN THE STATUTES GOVERNING THE OPERATION OF THE MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOARD. II -J VETERANS PREFERENCE The basic provisions of the uniform veterans preference law for state and local government have over the years worked reasonably well and except for a few changes to restore employee equity should not be changed. The AMM recommends the legislature review and modify the law as follows: J -1 NO COMPENSATION FOR UNWORKED PERIODS WHEN A VETERAN'S EMPLOYMENT IS TERMINATED AND HE OR SHE DOES NOT REQUEST A HEARING WITHIN TEN DAYS, OR WHEN AN IMPARTIAL HEARING BODY DETERMINES THAT THE DISMISSAL WAS FOR JUST CAUSE, THE LAW SHOULD NOT REQUIRE THAT THE VETERAN RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR ANY PERIOD WHEN SERVICES WERE NOT ACTUALLY PERFORMED. J -2 ONE HEARING PROCEDURE THE LAW SHOULD MAKE IT CLEAR THAT THE PETITION PROCEDURE IS AN ALTERNATIVE TO LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING. THE HEARING BODY NEED NOT BE THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION (AT ITS OPTION) IN THOSE CITIES THAT HAVE SUCH A COMMISSION. J -3 PROBATIONARY'PERIOD THE LAW SHOULD BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW CITIES TO TERMINATE VETERANS THE SAME AS ALL OTHER PERSONS DURING THE PROBATIONARY PERIOD WITHOUT HEARING. II -K EMPLOYEE DISABILITY - LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE FUNDS A number of cities with local police and fire pension funds are experiencing a problem with employees receiving disability payments from the local fund and full worker's compensation payments totalling more in after tax take home pay than if they were working. PERA policy and fire employees are prohibited by law from receiving greater pay while on disability than while working, but Minnesota Statutes 424.27 specifically prohibits cities with local plans from correcting the above situation. This quirk in the law is a costly one for cities and provides impetus for marginally disabled employees to stay home. Why work when you can make more by not working? Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CORRECT MINNESOTA STATUTE 424.27 TO ELIMINATE THE ABILITY OF AN EMPLOYEE IN A LOCAL POLICE OR FIRE -19- FUND TO RECEIVE DOUBLE DISABILITY PAYMENTS WHICH EXCEED THE NORMAL AFTER TAX WORKING INCOME. FURTHER, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD CLARIFY AND ESTABLISH STANDARDS SIMILAR TO PERA FOR DETERMINING DISABILITY. II -L POLICE OFFICER ELIGIBILITY AND RECRUITMENT During the 1978 legislative session the Legislature adopted a uniform state licensing recruitment for police officers which is unparalleled in any other area of the United States. The requirements enforced by the Minnesota Peace Officer Standards & Training Board (MPOST) stipulate mandatory minimum standards for recruitment, training and conduct of police officers which significantly infringe on the prerogatives of local government. In conjunction with establishing the POST Board and rules and regulations, the legislature also eliminated the former BCA schooling and training program for entry level police officers. The POST rules and regulatons became effective July 1, 1979. Under these rules and regulations, any one interested in becoming a police officer must have two years of law enforcement training after which they are given a written examination administered by POST. They are then required to take an eight week skill course. Five institutions are certified as meeting POST requirement for the 2 year training in the metro area; Metro U, Lakewood Community College, Inver Hills Community College, North Hennepin Community College and Normandale Community College. Under the present operation, completion of the skills level requirements can only be accomplished through full time day time attendance. In the two years since POST has been in effect, several problems have arisen The first of those problems deals mainly with the age and maturity of the applicant now being tested for the police officer position by metropolitan jurisdictions. Formerly that applicant was predominately a mid to late twenty year old applicant, many times possessing a four year degree, however, not necessarily related to the law enforcement area. Many applicants were individuals interested in a complete career change and often times older and of more mature character. The two year law enforcement degree requirement has now shifted that applicant to a much younger age group. Applicants who have entered the law enforcement program right out of high school generally, compared to the previous applicant pool, demonstrate a lack of maturity and people contact experience. In many instances this applicants' interest in police work is based on misrepresented ideas of what police work is really like. The second major problem with the present POST regulations is the full time eight weeks skill course process. This process makes it extremely difficult for an individual interested in a career change, while at the same time being required to work to support a family, to take the time off necessary to complete the skills -20- training course. These two problems have significantly inhibited police agencies, particularly in the suburban areas, to attract a mix of qualified police candidates. Another problem is that POST- certified schools is too with an opportunity to hire members as police officers. regulations, some cities ma affirmative action goals. protected class enrollment in low to provide police departments qualified protected class group Under current POST rules and y not be able to meet their The present regulations also effectively deny a police officer candidate the opportunity to obtain, or police jurisdiction the opportunity to provide on- the -job- experience and training prior to becoming a full fledged officer. This practice is followed in many other employment sectors through either an apprenticeship or internship program. It works to the advantage of both the employer and employee. The present system of certifying police officers in the State of Minnesota does not contain adequate flexibility to address on- the -job- training and ultimate certification through a one year . apprenticeship or internship program in lieu of 2 years of formalized training. AS A RESULT OF THESE PROBLEMS, AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE PRESENT POST RULES AND REGULATIONS BE AMENDED TO PROVIDE FOR FOUR -YEAR COLLEGE GRADUATES TO TAKE AN EQUIVALENCY EXAMINATION AND UPON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE EQUIVALENCY EXAMINATION BE ELIGIBLE FOR HIRING AS A POLICE OFFICER WITH COMPLETION OF THE SKILL TRAINING ON A PART TIME BASIS. FURTHER, THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE SKILLS TRAINING COURSES BE OFFERED THROUGHOUT THE METRO AREA ON A PART TIME BASIS AND THAT THE REQUIREMENT FOR ENTRY LEVEL POLICE OFFICER BE RE- EXAMINED THEREBY MAKING AVAILABLE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR APPLICANTS TO ASSUME A POSITION OF POLICE OFFICER WITH THE CONDITIONS THAT CERTAIN LEVELS OF TRAINING AND SKILLS MUST BE ACHIEVED WITHIN A REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME NOT TO EXCEED ONE YEAR PRIOR TO CERTIFICATION. THE AMM ALSO RECOMMENDS THAT STATE LAW BE AMENDED TO REQUIRE POST - CERTIFIED SCHOOLS TO DEVELOP A RECRUITMENT SYSTEM WHICH PROVIDES ADEQUATE REPRESENTATION OF PROTECTED CLASSES AND THAT THE PRESENT POST RULES REGULATIONS BE - AMENDED TO ALLOW COMPARABLE OUT -OF -STATE TRAINING COURSES A A SUBSTITUTE FOR POST- CERTIFIED SCHOOL TRAINING. THIS SUBSTITUTION SHOULD BE ALLOWED ONLY IF THE CANDIDATE CAN PASS AN EQUIVALENCY EXAM AND THE SKILLS COURSE. II -M JUDICIAL SYSTEM -21- The principal job of municipal government is to protect people and their property. The people, through their property taxes, pay a considerable amount for this protection primarily in the form of police and fire service. For some while, police departments and municipal officials have been frustrated by an apparent leniency of judgements being handed down by our municipal and district courts whereby, after having expended a considerable amount of the public's money and often taking considerable risks, a violator is apprehended and prosecuted in court only to be turned out with a suspended or light sentence. In some communities youth crime and status offense have become such a major problem that the traditional process is no longer effective. The courts and probation departments cannot cope with the magnitude of numbers and, therefore, youthful offenders are more often turned back with only a reprimand or not even petitioned into the system for the first two or three offenses. The negative effects of this process are twofold; 1) It tends to reinforce the violator's lack of respect for others and their contempt for the law, especially impressionable youth; and 2) It is terribly demoralizing for our police departments and law abiding citizens. Recent legislative initiatives such as the promotion of work restitution programs, victim protection, and stronger penalties for habitual criminals are helping, but more emphasis is needed in the area of juvenile crime prevention and penalities. r M -1 YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU Youth service bureaus operating within or by joint powers agreement among a small number of communities and sponsored through federal and state grants have proven successful in curbing increased incidence of repetitive youth offense, especially because of their ease and speed of access by local clients. However, this concept is endangered due to fund limitations .caused by levy limit restrictions which do not allow flexibility to start new programs or allow funding when--Federal Grants run out. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ENCOURAGE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO SPONSOR YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU TYPE ACTIVITIES AS A HELP AND BUFFER TO THE COURT SYSTEM AND A PREVENTATIVE FOR HABITUAL YOUTH OFFENSE. THE LEGISLATURE HAS ALREADY ALLOCATED SOME FUNDS FOR THIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY, BUT TO SUCCEED MUST PROVIDE LOCAL UNITS THE ABILITY TO FUND THESE PROGRAMS THROUGH THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY BY USE OF A SPECIAL LEVY OR BASE INCREASES. M -2 YOUTH PUNISHMENT Because of the increasing incidence of youthful offenders, the judicial system out of sheer burden tends to be somewhat lax in -22- rl punishment until the offender has many repeated appearances before the court. THE AMM SUGGESTS THE JUVENILE JUSTICE TASK FORCE INVESTIGATE STRONGER ACTION FOR YOUTHFUL.OFFENDERS, ESPECIALLY BEFORE A PATTERN OF LAWBREAKING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, THUS DISCOURAGING REPEATED ACTS BECAUSE THE YOUTH KNOWS THAT HARSH PUNISHMENT WILL OCCUR. N. DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING. Data privacy laws protect individuals from the release of information to the public which the legislature has deemed to be private or which could be unnecessarily harmful to the individual. On the other hand, the open meeting law prohibits local governmental units from holding closed sessions except when discussing pending or actual law suits with an attorney or labor negotiations. Unfortunately, many occasions have arisen in past years where local units in dealing with individuals or employee disciplinary matters have been forced to either violate the Data Privacy Statutes or the Open Meeting Statute in order to fairly resolve the issue. THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MAKE THE DATA PRIVACY AND OPEN MEETING LAWS CONSISTENT SO THAT TO COMPLY WITH ONE LAW A CITY SHOULD NOT HAVE TO VIOLATE THE OTHER. II -0 ONE CLASS OF BEER Legislation has been proposed in past years to eliminate the manufacture and sale of 3.2 beer in Minnesota. If this were done substantial problems could arise in control of the sale of strong beer in service stations, grocery stores, drugstores, and elsewhere that 3.2 beer is presently sold. IF THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF 3.2 BEER IS ELIMINATED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, THE AMM STRONGLY URGES CONTINUED LOCAL CONTROL OF LICENSING AND WOULD OPPOSE LEGISLATION MANDATING OR GRANDFATHERING LICENSING OF 3.2 BEER SALES LOCATIONS WHERE THE PRINCIPAL PRODUCT IS NOT STRONG ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES. FURTHER, THE LAW SHOULD BE MODIFIED SO THAT AN ESTABLISHMENT OR PERSON HAVING A LICENSE TO DISPENSE STRONG BEER DOES NOT NEED TO OBTAIN AN ADDITIONAL LICENSE TO DISPENSE OR SELL 3.2 CLASSIFIED BEER. II -P OPPOSE INITIATIVE - REFERENDUM FOR ZONING ORDINANCES The Municipal Planning Act has been interpreted to allow for initiative and referendum (IR) in cities with charter provisions allowing for IR. There is evidence that this interpretation has -23- interferred with cities' efforts to achieve their planning and development goals, particularly in the housing field in the metropolitan area. First, the statutory procedure on zoning ordinances provides ample opportunity for the participation of both the general public and individual property owners in .decisions relating to zoning ordinances or the Municipal Comprehensive Plan. It is inappropriate to allow such a long deliberative process to be overturned by a relatively few voters who may have narrow interests in the issue. Second, the clear intent of the existing planning law is that zoning ordinances and amendments not be subject to IR. Without a clear uniform statutory procedure for the implementation of municipal planning, statutory and charter cities will be subject to different procedures and the intent of the act will not be realized. Therefore, THE AMM SUPPORTS AN AMENDMENT TO THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING ACT TO PROVIDE THAT ZONING ORDINANCES AND AMENDMENTS NOT BE SUBJECT TO CITY CHARTER PROVISIONS ON INITIATIVE AND REFERENDUM. II -Q SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM Starting in 1977 the legislature made a strong commitment to control Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt tree diseases by enacting an excellent Shade Tree Disease Control program and backing that legislation with sufficient funding to bring the diseases under control. However, due to lack of financing in the most recent past, Dutch Elm disease is once again spreading rapidly -as it has in other areas of the country when financial commitment has stopged. Therefore, the AMM urges the legislature to: Q -1 PROGRAM CONTINUATION CONTINUE THE SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL LEGISLATION WITH NO CHANGES AND TO PERMIT CITIES TO USE SPECIAL LEVIES, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, AND OTHER SOURCES TO FUND LOCAL CONTROL PROGRAMS. Q -2 GRANT FUNDING THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ONCE AGAIN MAKE SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL A TOP PRIORITY ISSUE AND RE -ENACT THE GRANT PROGRAM AT A SUFFICIENT LEVEL TO ACHIEVE A 50% SANITATION AND REFORESTATION TARGET LEVEL. II -R TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING The high incidence of Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt disease has understandably caused a large increase in the activity and -24- numbers of firms in the tree removal and treatment service business. Several proposals have been made to initiate metropolitan or statewide licensing and setting of standards. the Associations does concur that some form of consumer and worker protection, as well as control of chemical treatment activities, would be advisable. However, we would oppose mandatory licensing on state or metropolitan level. Licensing of contractors and various activities has long been a- local prerogative and the mechanism for license review, issuance and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing has been successful and, therefore, maintained at the local level, is that inspection an enforcement personnel reside at the local level and are much more familiar with the area and activities, thus providing better and faster enforcement. Most local units currently have a tree inspector and some form of control /removal program. It then logically follows that licensing could most economically and efficiently be initiated and enforced at this level. R -1 ORDINANCE CONTROL THE ASSOCIATION URGES MUNICIPALITIES TO ADOPT TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY OWNERS, THE GENERAL PUBLIC, AND EMPLOYEES OF FIRMS ENGAGED IN THAT SERVICE. TO THAT END, THE ASSOCIATION HAS DEVELOPED AND WILL MAKE AVAILABLE TO INTERESTED MUNICIPALITIES A MODEL - ORDINANCE SETTING STANDARDS AND REGULATING THE ACTIVITIES OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT FIRMS. R -2 LOCAL LICENSING THE ASSOCIATION STRONGLY SUPPORTS TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING 1-T THE PREROGATIVE OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUT DOES STRONGLY OPPOSE INITIATION OF MANDATORY LICENSING AND /OR LICENSING AT THE STATE OF METROPOLITAN LEVEL IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STATE ESTABLISH UNIFORM MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREE TREATMENT CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSES. R -3 RECOGNIZING THAT THERE ARE EFFORTS ON THE PART OF SOME TO LEGISLATE STATE OR METROPOLITAN WIDE LICENSING, THE AMM URGES THAT IF AREA WIDE LICENSING IS CONSIDERED, THAT A PROVISION BE INCLUDED ALLOWING A LOCAL UNIT TO REVOKE THE LICENSE PROVISIONS WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION FOR CAUSE. II -S LIMIT NEW AUTHORITY FOR STATE AUDITOR The State Auditor issued a report dated April 14, 1982, entitled 'Guideline for the Audit Responsibility of Local Governmental Units within Minnesota'. The report indicates that of 4,308 units of government including counties, cities, towns, school districts, intergovernmental agencies, and fire relief -25- associations only 1369 have a legal audit requirement and of those the state auditor has mandatory audit responsibility for 370. The Auditor is suggesting that generally accepted auditing standards (GARS) are implemented in Minnesota, that uniform accounting and reporting be standardized for all units, and that all units meet uniform auditing standards. It is further proposed that all units have an audit requirement (reporting requirements for very small units) and fall under the jurisdiction of the state auditor whose office would be empowered to audit each unit once every four years. Fees would be related to actual cost. The local units of government would be expected to select an audit firm with the approval of the state auditor. Only audit firms passing a peer review (p.rocess established by State Auditor) would qualify for doing audits. The state auditor would prescribe all standards, procedures, and reporting requirements. While the AMM finds merit in the goal of achieving a higher degree of efficiency and accountability, it is questionable if it is necessary to create a burgeoning bureaucracy that would in effect dictate which audit forms are acceptable beyond the standards of education and competency already in place. Do all units really need to comply with a standard audit which may imply costly conversion to accrual accounting? Most units under 2500 population are on a cost basis, while all units above that use accrual or modified accrual. Is there really a need to standardize reporting between cities. and schools, or schools and counties? Reporting - within individual types of local units is already fairly well standardized. the auditor currently reviews all audits and can make suggestions on reporting or procedure modifications. This proposal appears -to suggest moving away from a well working private sector service to a larger more controlled governmental operation. It implies greater cost in times when all units of government are trying to reduce costs. THE AMM OPPOSES AS UNNECESSARY THE STATE AUDITOR HAVING ADDITIONAL IN HOUSE AUDIT AUTHORITY AND THE ASSUMPTION OF POWER TO DESIGNATE OR APPROVE AUDIT FIRMS FOR CITIES. II -T PERA BENEFITS, FINANCING, AND ADMINISTRATION The following principles should govern any changes the legislature makes in PERA and the other statewide pension plans. T -1 HIGH FIVE YEAR BENEFIT BASE The adoption in 1973 of the "high five year" benefit formula for PERA has provided very adequate pension benefits for career municipal employees. Further shortening of the averaging period would create windfalls for some PERA members and multiply opportunities for manipulation of service and salaries to maximize pension benefits without proportional contributions to -26- the fund. Therefore, THE AMM OPPOSES MODIFICATION OF THE 'HIGH FIVE' FORMULA. T -2 GENERAL PERA BENEFIT INCREASES AND FUNDING ANY INCREASES IN PERA BENEFITS SHOULD BE GRANTED ONLY TO THE EXTENT THAT PROPOSED CONTRIBUTIONS AND CURRENT RESERVES ARE SUFFICIENT TO FULLY FUND THE INCREASES IN THE OPINION OF ONE OR MORE RECOGNIZED PENSION ACTUARIES WHO ARE INDEPENDENT OF THE PERA ORGANIZATION. ANY BENEFIT INCREASE OR CONTRIBUTION REDUCTIONS PERMITTED BY EXCESS RESERVES OR EXCESSIVE CURRENT CONTRIBUTIONS OR COMBINATIONS OF THE TWO SHOULD BE OF SUCH AMOUNTS AS TO BENEFIT THE EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE EQUALLY AS. A PERCENTAGE OF OVERALL EMPLOYEE SALARY. T -3 EARLY RETIREMENT Devices to promote early retirement, like the proposed rule of 75 for police are a very blunt instrument for cutting budgets or weeding out dead wood. BECAUSE INCREASING LIFE SPANS SHOULD LEAD TO AN INCREASE IN YEARS OF EMPLOYABILITY, THE AMM OPPOSES EXTENSION OF THE RULE OF 85 AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RULE OF 75 FOR POLICE OR FIRE FUND MEMBERS AS WELL AS OTHER PROPOSALS TO ENCOURAGE EARLIER RETIREMENT BY PUBLIC EMPLOYEES. T -4 RETIREE HEALTH INSURANCE BY PERA Among all the proposals for benefit increases, the one that most threatens the financial soundness of PERA and other Minnesota public pension funds, is the proposal to provide health insurance to retirees paid from the pension fund. Full payment would commit the taxpayers to an open ended promise to pay a cost that is escalating at the rate of 15% to 20% per year even in low inflation years. Partial payment would provide a foot -in- the -door for full payment. Either would hamper efforts to control health care costs by making the recipient responsible for a significant portion of charges to encourage thrifty use. IN ORDER TO AVOID RECURRING PROBLEMS SIMILAR TO THOSE EXPERIENCED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN ITS PENSION PROGRAMS, THE AMM OPPOSE! PAYMENT OF HEALTH CARE COSTS FOR RETIREES FROM THE PERA FUND. T -5 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS BY CITIES In order to prevent the creation of large unfunded deficits for promised health care for retired public employees, in the same way that unfunded actuarial deficits were created by promised pension benefits prior to statutory requirements for funding, the -27- Association urges the legislature to impose the following restrictions, BEFORE ANY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT MAKES ANY NEW COMMITMENT TO PAY ALL OR ANY PART OF SUCH PREMIUMS OR CHARGES IT SHALL ASCERTAIN THE ENTIRE COST. ANY GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY PAYING FOR RETIREE BENEFITS SHALL BUDGET FOR THE YEAR IN WHICH THE COMMITMENT IS TO BE INCURRED, SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO COVER ALL PROJECTED CURRENT AND FUTURE COSTS WHICH WILL ACCRUE DURING THAT YEAR, AS DETERMINED BY A LICENSED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT OR RECOGNIZED ACTUARY. ANY GOVERNMENTAL UNIT PAYING ANY PART OF THE COST OF RETIREE BENEFITS AUTHORIZED BY THIS SUBDIVISION, OTHER THAN INCLUDING RETIRED EMPLOYEES IN A SINGLE GROUP WITH ACTIVE EMPLOYEES, SHALL ESTABLISH A SEPARATE DEDICATED FUND FROM WHICH THE COST OF THESE BENEFITS SHALL BE PAYABLE AND SHALL BE AUTHORIZED TO LEVY AND COLLECT A TAX, IF NECESSARY, IN THE NEXT ANNUAL TAX LEVY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING THE NECESSARY FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT OF SUCH PROJECTED COSTS. T -6 GENERAL RETIREE BENEFITS IF ANY INCREASE IN BENEFITS IS ENACTED FOR PERA RETIREES, THE RESULTING COSTS SHOULD NOT BE PAID FROM THE PERA FUND, BUT RATHER SHOULD BE FINANCED BY A DIRECT APPROPRIATION FROM THE ;.STATE GENERAL FUND. T -7 MINNESOTA POST RETIREMENT INVESTMENT FUND THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONTINUATION OF THE MINNESOTA POST RETIREMENT INVESTMENT FUND AS A MEANS OF PROVIDING POST- RETIREMENT INCREASES IN THE PENSION BENEFITS OF RETIREES UNDER THE STATE -WIDE PENSION FUNDS. THE AMM SUPPORTS STATE FUNDING OF ANY FUND DEFICITS FROM GENERAL FUNDS OR AMORTIZATION OF THE DEFICITS BY CREDITING A REASONABLE PORTION OF EXCESS EARNINGS OVER STATUTORY ASSUMPTIONS TO RETIRE DEFICITS AND PAYMENT OF THE REMAINDER OF EXCESS EARNINGS TO RETIREES AS A COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENT WITHOUT ESTABLISHMENT OF ANY GUARANTEED ADJUSTMENT. T -8 PENSION FUND PROGRAMS SINCE INTEGRATION OF PENSION FUND ADMINISTRATION MECHANISMS MAY LEAD TO COMBINING THE FUNDS, THE AMM OPPOSES ANY MOVE TO COMBINE ADMINISTRATION OF THE THREE STATE -WIDE PENSION PROGRAMS. T -9 INSURANCE REBATE The PERA police and fire fund is now essentially fully funded. Furthermore, the employer (taxpayers) through payment of more than 50 percent of contributions to this fund is creating a surplus not needed for pension purposes. Therefore, ENE THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD AMEND THE PRESENT PROVISION ON DISBURSEMENT OF THE TWO PERCENT TAX ON AUTOMOBILE CASUALTY INSURANCE TO ALLOW EXPENDITURES BY THE RECIPIENT POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF ANY EXCESS OVER THE EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF POLICE RETIREMENT COSTS FOR ANY POLICE DEPARTMENT PURPOSE INSTEAD OF REQUIRING PAYMENT TO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND. SINCE THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND HAS NOW ESSENTIALLY ACHIEVED FULL FUNDING, EMPLOYER' AND EMPLOYEES' CONTRIBUTIONS SHOULD BE REDUCED TO AN AMOUNT SUFFICIENT TO PAY NORMAL COSTS ON AN EQUAL SHARE BASIS. T -10 CONTRIBUTION SAVINGS ANY DECREASE IN CONTRIBUTIONS BY LOCAL UNITS DUE TO DEFICIT REDUCTIONS OR PROGRAM CHANGES SHOULD ACCRUE TO THE LOCAL UNIT. T -11 STATE TAXATION OF PERA CONTRIBUTIONS Recently, the Internal Revenue Service ruled that employee contributions to PERA and similar public pension systems are not subject to federal income tax contribution during the year in which they are contributed to the system, but rather are taxable in the year in which the employee actually receives the benefit. This ruling is consistent with the manner fn which municipal employer contributions are taxed. Since the employee does not'- have use of the contribution- in -the year it is made and the Federal government has deferred taxation until the benefits are received, THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO DEFER STATE TAXATION OF EMPLOYEE PERA CONTRIBUTIONS UNTIL BENEFITS ARE RECEIVED AND TO EXCLUDE THE-PERA AMOUNT FROM THE EMPLOYEES GROSS INCOME. Tj12 PERA BOARD AND DIRECTOR SELECTION PROCESS THE SELECTION PROCESS FOR THE PERA BOARD SHOULD BE REVISED TO PREVENT DOMINATION BY A SINGLE WELL FINANCED INDIVIDUAL OR ORGANIZATION. SELECTION OF A SUCCESSOR TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SHOULD OCCUR ONLY AFTER AN OPEN SELECTION PROCESS TO CHOOSE THE BEST QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL IS COMPLETED. FURTHER, THE STATUTES SHOULD SPECIFICALLY PROVIDE CRITERIA AND QUALIFICATIONS FOR INDIVIDUALS TO SERVE AS BOARD MEMBERS AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. T -13 MERGING OF LOCAL POLICE AND FIRE INTO PERA POLICE AND FIRE ASSOCIATIONS SHOULD BE MERGED INTO THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUNDS ONLY IF A, NEW DIRECTOR IS SELECTED ON A FAIR,OPEN BASIS, AND ONLY IF THE CITIES AND ASSOCIATIONS SEEKING EACH MERGER PROVIDES THE PERA POLICE AND FIRE FUND WITH CASH OR PAYMENT PLANS INCLUDING REALISTIC INTEREST TO COVER THE FULL -29- ACTUARIAL. COST OF THE PENSIONS PURCHASED. FURTHER, NO INCREASE IN BENEFITS TO PERA POLICE AND FIRE MEMBERS SHOULD BE GRANTED SINCE PERA BENEFITS ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE ATTRACTIVE THAN THOSE OF THE LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION. T -14 PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SALARY THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROHIBIT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM RECEIVING AN ADDITIONAL SALARY FROM A PERA CONBRIBUTING ORGANIZATION TO PREVENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. II -U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS During the 1983 legislative session, Tort liability limits for local governments were increased from $100,000/$300,000 to $200,000/$600,000 as of August 1, 1984. Limits for Hazardous Waste disposal claims are $300,000/$600,000 and will be $400,000/$1,200,000 effective August 1, 1984. During these discussions, the Governors office expressed a desire to remove Tort liability limits altogether. If done, this could have a critical and disasterous effect on city financing and property taxes. The cost of providing insurance for unlimited liability would be prohibitive and cause a long term unnecessary major property tax increase. Also, if a major claim were to be- -filed and supported through the judicial system for a sum far in excess of what might be considered reasonable, a local jurisdiction could literally be driven to financial ruin with the taxpayers becoming liable for huge property tax payments. Unlike a private sector business, a city cannot merely declare bankruptcy and cease to exist. THE AMM CONSIDERS THE CURRENT TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ADEQUATE TO SATISFY ANY REASONABLE CLAIM AND THEREFORE URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RETAIN THE LIMITS IN CURRENT LAW AND NOT CONSIDER UNLIMITED LIABILITY. II -V EMPLOYEE TIME /DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS The 1984 Legislature eliminated the authority of outstate cities, as it previously had done for metropolitan area cities to be able to require employees to reside within the city boundary. However, in allowing outstate cities the authority to establish job related time or distance requirements the legislature removed that authority in the metropolitan area, Therefore; THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE AUTHORITY FOR METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES TO SET JOB RELATED TIME OR DISTANCE RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR CITY EMPLOYEES. -30- III HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION Housing is a metropolitan problem of major proportions. According to demographic data compiled by the Metropolitan Council, there is an estimated need for about 120,000 new housing units in the metropolitan area by 1995. A significant portion of these units (68,000) are needed for persons who cannot afford market rate housing. There are strong indications that under existing conditions, the total need for housing or the need of the lower income segment will not be met. In addition, there is an equally important problem of maintaining and re -using the existing housing stock effectively. Otherwise, more new housing will have to be produced to make up for unnecessary losses and there will be an under utilization of public service investments. The Federal and State Governments appear to be reducing their financial commitments to provide housing for low and moderate income persons and this will intensify the housing shortage problem for those unable to purchase or rent at market rates. It is also apparent that local units of government do not have the financial capability to assume the shortfall in Federal and State provided subsidies. The housing shortage problem for persons unable to afford market rate housing can only be solved if all levels of government and the private sector work together and if each contributes a fair share to the solution. Each level of government should contribute its fair share to help solve the problem and each level's contributions should be of the kind it is best suited to make. The Federal and State Levels should continue to provide most of the direct subsidies for low and moderate income persons. The Federal-and State Governments also have the responsibility to improve the overall investment climate and to provide a tax climate in which the private sector can produce rental units that are affordable to low and moderate income households. The State should also grant local units of government the authority and flexibility to conduct the kind of housing programs that best meets their diverse needs. The Metropolitan Council should develop a realistic comprehensive housing plan for the Metropolitan Area that provides specific guidance to the public and private sectors so that both can make rational decisions relative to future housing needs; a plan which delineates the responsibilities of all the "actors" in a complex housing delivery system. Local units of Government also have a strong role to play. Even though local land use controls constitute a small portion of the total cost of housing, local units should not set requirements which go beyond what is necessary for the -31- protection of health, safety and welfare. Local units should also work with the private sector to make the best use of existing tools (revenue bonds, tax increment financing, etc.) to produce housing which is more affordable. Finally, decision makers at all levels of government must become more cognizant of their actions, policies, and decisions which have an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs. Such actions, policies, and decisions may in themselves be worthwhile and beneficial but which do drive up the cost of housing. BASED ON THE HOUSING PROBLEM DEFINITION, THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT: III -A EXAMINE LOCAL REQUIREMENTS Local requirements constitute a very small portion of the total cost of producing housing, but all participants in the housing delivery system need to do their part to hold costs down. COMMUNITIES EXAMINE THEIR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS (LAND USE REGULATIONS, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES, ETC.) TO SEE IF THESE REQUIREMENTS GO BEYOND WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION OF HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE, AND INHIBIT THE CONSTRUCTION OF BASIC SHELTER AFFORDABLE HOUSING. MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE WHEN APPROPRIATE. III -B MANDATORY STANDARDS AND ALTERNATIVE HOUSING Mandatory, uniform land use standards for housing style and location would not be appropriate because of the great diversity among cities and differences within cities relative to state of development, topography, lot and dwelling sizes, the mix of housing values and costs, and the level of municipal services which are provided. Therefore, cities should retain the authority. to regulate land uses, including the determination as to whether alternative housing, such as manufactured and accessory housing can be located in areas where other modes of housing have been established. Land use regulation is one of the tools city officials need to protect the health, safety, welfare, and interests of the city's residents. THE LEGISLATURE NOT PASS LEGISLATION WHICH SETS MANDATORY ZONING AND SUBDIVISION STANDARDS OR WHICH REMOVES LAND USE REGULATION AUTHORITY FROM LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. CITIES SHOULD RETAIN THE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE LOCATION, SIZE AMOUNT, AND TYPE OF HOUSING, INCLUDING MANUFACTURED AND ACCESSORY HOUSING, WITHIN THEIR BOUNDARIES. -32- III -C PROGRAM LATITUDE There is a tendency on the part of the Legislature when it provides funding to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) or political subdivisions for housing programs to make sure it is a safe investment. The AMM does not disagree with the need to be prudent with public funding. However, the state guidelines and regulations sometimes are so stringent they inhibit inovation and render the programs inoperable. Also, at times the rules and regulations for programs administered locally, are more stringent and cumbersome than for similar programs administered through the MHFA. There is a need for creative and inovative programs to increase the production of housing for low and moderate income persons. THE LEGISLATURE WHEN PROVIDING FUNDING FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF INOVATIVE AND CREATIVE PROGRAMS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF HOUSING FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS SHOULD PROVIDE ENOUGH PROGRAM LATITUDE IN THE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SO THAT THE PROGRAMS CAN BE TAILORED TO MEET THE NEEDS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF A VARIETY OF SITUATIONS IN DIFFERING LOCALS. ALSO THE STATE GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS SHOULD NOT BE MORE STRINGENT FOR PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED BY LOCAL UNITS AS OPPOSED TO PROGRAMS ADMINISTERED THROUGH STATE OR REGIONAL AGENCIES. III -D RENEWAL OF FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING The Federal and State levels of government have a broader and more diverse tax base than local units of government and should provide the necessary funding to fulfill their housing policy commitments to lower income persons. This funding commitment is needed to provide adequate housing for those persons unable to afford market rate housing. FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDING FOR HOUSING SHOULD BE INCREASED TO IMPLEMENT THE HOUSING POLICIES OF THOSE LEVELS AND MATCH THE NEEDS OF THOSE PERSONS REQUIRING ASSISTED HOUSING INCLUDING ASSISTANCE FOR RENOVATING AND REHABILITATING SUBSTANDARD HOUSING UNITS. III -E AUTHORITY AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR LOCAL HOUSING PROGRAMS There is a great diversity among the cities in the metropolitan area. Some cities need more housing for low and moderate income persons while other cities need more housing for middle and upper income persons. Cities should have the authority to promote whichever kind of housing is within the public purpose and best interest of the city to do so. It is also important that state and federal agencies cooperate with cities in developing workable programs to meet the diverse needs of -33- cities. Cities need to have more control over the cost of housing being developed if they are to meet the intent of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. In a practical sense, municipalities, may be able to require reduced cost housing, but it is preferable to have this authority specified by statute specifically. Dedication would provide land, or cash in lieu of land, for housing needs and is not intended to be in addition to parks dedication but a substitute for it if that would better enable the city to meet its overall needs. CITIES BE GRANTED SUFFICIENT AUTHORITY AND FLEXIBILITY BY THE LEGISLATURE TO CONDUCT HOUSING PROGRAMS THAT MEET THE DIFFERING NEEDS OF DIVERSE CITIES AND THAT ENABLE CITIES TO COMPLY WITH THE METROPOLITAN LAND PLANNING ACT WHICH DIRECTS CITIES TO PROVIDE OPPORTUNITY FOR LOW AND MODERATE COSTS HOUSING. CITIES SHOULD BE ALLOWED, IF THEY DESIRE, TO REQUIRE LOWER COSTS HOUSING IN PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS AND TO REQUIRE THE DEDICATION OF LAND OR CASH FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIRED DEDICATION FOR PARKS. ALSO, CITIES SHOULD HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DEVELOP HOUSING FOR MIDDLE AND UPPER INCOME PERSONS IF THAT IS NEEDED TO ACHIEVE A BALANCED HOUSING STOCK. III -F FINANCING FEDERAL, STATE AND REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES The city services which are provided to residents and property owners and financed largely by property taxes do not relate to the financial ability of the property owners. Property taxes provide the major revenue source for most cities and reduction in property taxes based on ability to pay would compound the housing problems in most cities. THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX SYSTEM SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE VEHICLE TO FINANCE OR IMPLEMENT FEDERAL, STATE OR REGIONAL HOUSING POLICIES. III -G PRACTICES WHICH INCREASE HOUSING COSTS Decision makers at various levels of government must become more cognizant of actions they take which have an indirect but substantial impact on housing costs. These actions in themselves may be worthwhile and beneficial, but when implemented result in increased housing costs. Examples of this type of action would include such things as the sewer availability charge, restricted growth policies, building and energy codes, environmental rules, etc. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND STATE AGENCIES EXAMINE THEIR PRACTICES AND POLICIES TO DETERMINE POSSIBLE HIDDEN IMPACTS ON HOUSING COSTS OF SAID PRACTICES AND POLICIES NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO HOUSING. CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE AS NECESSARY. -34- III -H RENTAL HOUSING IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA Rental housing plays an important role in the Twin Cities housing market. Approximately 35 per cent of the housing units in the Twin Cities region are rental units. Traditionally, rental units have provided an affordable housing option for singles, young adults, young' married, students, the elderly, and low and moderate income- households. In reality, rental housing units serve a market much more diverse than that served by owner occupied units. Yet over the past several years a number of problems have developed in the rental market, including: 1. Production of new rental units has declined drastically as households are unable to afford the rents which must be charged to cover costs and financing. 2. Many households which in the past would have moved from rental to ownership status are unable to do so due to both the increased cost of housing units and high interest rates. 3. The combination of few additions to the supply of rental units, increased competition for rental units, conversion of rental units to condominiums, increased operating costs, and general inflation has created a situation where many rental units are not an affordable option for low and moderate income households. 4. The supply of existing rental units, which is predominately efficiency and one bedroom units, does not adequately address the needs of families seeking rental units. Precisely because rental housing serves so many diverse types of households and because the relative size of each category is changing the solution to these problems must be multifaceted. ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT BECOME INVOLVED TO SUCCESSFULLY ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS IN THE RENTAL MARKET. IN PARTICULAR, THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS HAVE CRUCIAL ROLES IN IMPROVING THE OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE SO THAT THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN PRODUCE BOTH RENTAL AND OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS AND IN PROVIDING SUBSIDY FUNDS SO THAT LOW AND MODERATE HOUSEHOLDS CAN AFFORD DECENT RENTAL UNITS. POSSIBLE ACTIONS INCLUDE: - MODIFYING FEDERAL AND STATE TAX POLICIES TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL INVESTMENT CLIMATE FOR THE PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF RENTAL HOUSING. -35- CONTINUING AND INCREASING THE LEVEL OF FUNDING AIMED AT GIVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME FAMILIES ACCESS TO DECENT HOUSING. CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH USE TAX EXEMPT BONDING TO CREATE BELOW MARKET RATE FUNDS FOR BOTH RENTAL AND OWNER OCCUPIED UNITS. CONTINUING PROGRAMS WHICH ALLOW REHABILITATION AND WEATHERIZATION PROGRAMS TO BE UTILIZED ON RENTAL UNITS. - GRANTING LOCAL UNITS MORE AUTHORITY TO REGULATE THE CONVERSION OF RENTAL UNITS TO CONDOMINIUMS. -36- IV METROPOLITAN AREA ISSUES & CONCERNS IV. PHILOSOPHY WITH RESPECT TO METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES The source of all governmental power resides with the people. The purpose of government is to identify and meet the needs of the governed. Needs of the people should be met with a minimum of involvement on the part of governing units. The degree of involvement should be that necessary to solve the problem. Because they are closer to the people, local governing bodies are generally most suited to deal with the day -to -day problems of their constituents, to introduce practical knowledge to the formation of policies and plans affecting their constituents, and to see the impact of those policies. Some issues are beyond the scope of a single governing body. Therefore, when such issues arise, it is in the interest of all concerned for governing units to cooperate in reaching a solution. There are a few problems which are of such magnitude that they encompass the concerns of an entire metropolitan area. Such problems and issues must necessarily be dealt with by a metropolitan unit. However, that unit should act in cooperation with local governing bodies by attempting to identify the best solution before determining courses of action. Metropolitan Agencies and Local Governmental Units should be viewed as "partners with each respecting the role of the other in solving these problems. Government must not be insulated from the governed. It must be kept in mind by all officials, elected and non - elected, that they are servants of the will of the people. IV -A PURPOSE OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES Due to the political fragmentation of this metropolitan area and the diverse fiscal conditions, geographic locations, and size of the local units of government, there is a need for a regional service delivery system to provide certain services or portions of certain services to most effectively and efficiently satisfy the needs of the residents living in this area. Example of this type of regional service needs would be the prevention of pollution, provision of certain transportation functions, etc. There is a also a need for some planning on a metropolitan wide basis which must be done in cooperation with local government. The federal and state government require that many grant applications be reviewed by a regional agency to determine consistency of these applications with regional plans and programs. Since this activity is beyond the control of local units of government, the Council appears to be the most logical agency to perform this function. -37- 1967 to coordinate "the planning and development" of the Metropolitan Area. The Council, as initially established, was mostly advisory but was given some direct authority and responsibility for regional policy development and coordination in the areas of wastewater treatment and disposal, transportation and airports. The Council was given limited approval authority for development proposals which were of metropolitan (regional) significance. The Council, in its infancy, was given no direct operational authority and instead the Legislature created two new Metropolitan Commissions (MWCC and MTC) and restructured the MAC to actually operate and provide those services. In subsequent sessions, the Metropolitan Council's authority and responsibility was expanded to include regional parks and open space, solid waste, regional review authority over certain types of federal grant applications, approval authority over controlled access highways and approval authority over certain elements (airports, transportation, parks and open space, and sewers) of local comprehensive plans. However, the Council was not given operational or implementation authority in these areas. There was one exception to this general division of responsibility: the Council was given regional HRA operational authority but the Council can only operate this authority in a city at the request of that city. The funding for the Metropolitan Council and the regional agencies has also evolved over the period of time a -nd is a mixture of property taxes, user fees and state and federal grants. Except for user fees, the Legislature has retained control over the_ maximum tax rates and the metro agencies cannot adjust these rates upward. The Legislature also retains control over grants thru its biennial appropriation process. - C -1 POLICY PLANNING - POLICY IMPLEMENTATION The historic legislative intent concerning separation of responsibility for metropolitan (regional) policy planning and policy implementation should be'reaffirmed. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE A PLANNING AND COORDINATING BODY; AND REGIONAL PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION AND OPERATIONS SHOULD BE CARRIED OUT THROUGH THE EXISTING METROPOLITAN AGENCIES AND /OR GENERAL PURPOSE UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT. C -2 METROPOLITAN STRUCTURE AND STRUCTURAL RELATIONSHIPS The structure of Metropolitan Governance that has evolved over the last 16 years is basically satisfactory. The structure and relationships between the Metropolitan Council and the various Metropolitan Commissions and Agencies are not uniform and function determines form. Major structural changes are not needed -39- THE PRIMARY AND PREDOMINATE PURPOSES OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONS SHOULD BE TO COORDINATE THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA: TO PROVIDE WITHOUT NEEDLESS DUPLICATION THOSE AREA WIDE SERVICES WHICH ARE BEYOND THE CAPABILITY OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS TO PROVIDE INDIVIDUALLY AND JOINTLY: TO PROVIDE AREA WIDE PLANNING WHERE NECESSARY WITH COOPERATION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS: AND TO FULFILL THE REGIONAL REVIEW RESPONSIBILITIES FOR GRANTS AND LOANS AS DIRECTED BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS. IV -B CRITERIA FOR EXTENSION OF METROPOLITAN ORGANIZATION POWERS There is a natural tendency of any organization to seek more authority in both breadth and depth; therefore, increased authority to -the Council and its agencies should contain carefully considered specific direction. ACTIVITIES WHICH ARE NOT MANDATED BY FEDERAL OR STATE GOVERNMENT BUT MAY BE UNDERTAKEN THROUGH USE OF GRANT MONEY SHOULD NOT BE PURSUED MERELY BECAUSE MONEY IS AVAILABLE UNLESS THERE IS A NEED THAT MUST BE SATISFIED FOR THE PEOPLE OF THE METROPOLITAN AREA AND THEN SHOULD BE PURSUED ONLY AFTER A THOROUGH EVALUATION TO DETERMINE WHAT ADDITIONAL LOCAL OR STATE EXPENDITURES ARE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE ACTIVITY, REACT TO THE FINDINGS OR IMPLEMENT A PROGRAM. THE LEGISLATURE, IN GRANTING THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ADDITIONAL AUTHORITY TO UNDERTAKE AN ACTIVITY, SHOULD SPECIFICALLY STATE THE AUTHORITY BEING GRANTED AND NOT INCLUDE GENERAL LEGISLATIVE LANGUAGE SUCH AS ... "INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SUCH MATTERS AS..." ANY EXPANSION OR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ONLY WHEN AT LEAST ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS: -THE SERVICE, FUNCTION, OR ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SHOWN TO BE NEEDED AND IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT IT CANNOT BE EFFECTIVELY OR EFFICIENTLY PROVIDED OR ADMINISTERED THROUGH EXISTING GENERAL PURPOSE UNITS OF GOVERNMENT. - INTERVENTION ON A REGIONAL BASIS IS NEEDED FOR PROTECTION OF THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEM. -THE SERVICE FUNCTION OR ACTIVITY IS MANDATED BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. IV -C STRUCTURES, PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING OF METROPOLITAN SERVICES AND PROGRAMS The Metropolitan Council was established by the Legislature in SWE but the AMM does recommend two minor but significant changes which should help to promote more effective communication and coordination of regional services. -THE CHAIRPERSONS OF THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD AND THE METROPOLITAN WASTE CONTROL COMMISSION SHOULD BE APPOINTED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL RATHER THAN THE GOVERNOR. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD BE REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS OF THE RTB AND MWCC AND TO PROVIDE COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE RESPONSIVENESS OF THESE BUDGETS TO THE REGIONAL POLICY PLANS ADOPTED BY THE COUNCIL FOR THOSE FUNCTIONS. C -3 FUNDING FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES Based on the recently completed study by the Metropolitan Council of the financing and financial status of the regional commissions and projected revenues available to provide regional services; the existing sources of revenues (user fees, state and federal appropriations and property taxes) are adequate. THE AMM WOULD OPPOSE THE IMPOSITION OF A SINGLE UNIFORM REVENUE iOURCE TO FUND REGIONAL SERVICES. C -4 REGIONAL TAX RATES AND USER FEES. The Legislature controls the maximum tax rates that can be levied by the Metropolitan Council and the other Metropolitan Agencies to fund their programs and services. We believe it should continue to do so. User fees are generally controlled by the Metropolitan Agency collecting the fees (MAC, MWCC and MTC) but the legis - lature has on occasion imposed certain user fees for the MTC. The setting of user fee, and the process for setting fees has generally not been considered a problem by. local officials except for the user fees controlled by the 'MWCC. A major internal management study and audit is currently being conducted of the MWCC and this may provide useful information relative to that agency. Based on the foregoing, the AMM believes that: USER FEES FOR REGIONAL SERVICES SHOULD NOT BE DETERMINED BY THE LEGISLATURE. THE MAXIMUM PROPERTY TAX RATES FOR REGIONALLY PROVIDED SERVICES SHOULD BE DETERMINED BY THE LEGISLATURE.THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE MWCC SHOULD STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO AN IMPROVED PROCESS FOR DETERMINING WASTE WATER TREATMENT FEES CHARGED BY THE MWCC. THE STUDY AND RECOMMENDATIONS SHOULD AS A MINIMUM, INCLUDE SUCH ITEMS AS: A VEHICLE FOR A CITY TO CHALLENGE THE AMOUNT CHARGED f0 A CITY IN A TIMELY FASHION; AN APPEAL PROCESS; THE NEED FOR SOME AGENCY TO REGULATE THE TREATMENT RATES; AND IF THERE IS A -40- NEED; THE MOST APPROPRIATE REGULATORY AGENCY. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO STUDY AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE APPROPRIATNESS OF USER FEES FOR SPECIAL USE TYPE FACILITIES WITHIN THE REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM. IV -D METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY The major recommendation of the Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance dealt with the issue of accountability of Metropolitan Agencies in order to improve their responsiveness to the various groups and government agencies interested in Metropolitan Governance. The AMM and other interest groups have also studied this issue and identified the lack of accountability as a major problem. D -1 LEGISLATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY The system of regional governance should be more accountable to the Legislature. The Metropolitan Council is in reality only accountable and responsive to the Governor who is elected on a state -wide basis. The Council, in turn, appoints the members of the RTB, MWCC and MPOSC. Consequently, these Agencies are further removed from the Legislature in terms of accountability. History has shown that by and large the Council and Regional Agenciea members are appointed, reappointed or removed mostly on_the basis of political party affiliation. In theory, the Council and Commissions are also accountable to the Legislature, but' -the Legislature in recent years has shown little inclination to exercise its overview authority unless the Council or Agencies request increased funding or new funding authority. A) BUDGET AND REVENUE FORECASTING OVERSIGHT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE THE COUNCIL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES TO PREPARE LONG RANGE BUDGET PROJECTIONS, IN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING REQUIREMENT OF ANNUAL OPERATING AND FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGETS. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WOULD ASSEMBLE AND INTEGRATE THE SEPARATE AGENCY BUDGETS INTO A SINGLE BUDGET DOCUMENT AND PREPARE SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW DOCUMENTS SHOWING AGGREGATE RESULTS AND MAKE A_REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE AND PUBLIC. THE COUNCIL WOULD NOT BE GRANTED ANY APPROVAL AUTHORITY BEYOND WHAT IT NOW POSSESSES. B) POLICY AND PROGRAM OVERSIGHT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES TO MAKE A FORMAL REPORT AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH LEGISLATIVE SESSION WHICH FOCUSES ON THE MAJOR PROGRAMS, PLANS, ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF THE RESPECTIVE AGENCIES. THE REPORTS AS A MINIMUM WOULD IDENTIFY AND COMMENT ON NEW PROGRAMS; MAJOR CHANGES TO ON -GOING PROGRAMS; THE NEED FOR SAME; MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS -41- SINCE THE PREVIOUS REPORT; AND DISCUSS REASONS FOR INCREASES IN USER FEES WHEN SUCH INCREASES EXCEED THE INFLATION RATES. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD HOLD 'HEARINGS' ON SUCH REPORTS AND ALLOW FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. C) LEGISLATIVE FOCUS THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ESTABLISH A CENTRAL POINT OF FOCUS WITHIN THE LEGISLATIVE STRUCTURE TO ENHANCE INCREASED ACCOUNTABILITY AND OVERSIGHT. THE PREFERRED METHOD WOULD BE TO ESTABLISH STANDING COMMITTEES IN BOTH HOUSES WHICH FOCUS ON METROPOLITAN AFFAIRS AND ISSUES AND CONCERNS OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE. ALL PROPOSED LEGISLATION PERTAINING TO THE AGENCIES OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE WOULD BE REVIEWED IN THESE COMMITTEES IN ADDITION TO THE NEW ACTIVITIES SUGGESTED IN IV -D -1. D -2 PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY The Association also believes that the metropolitan agencies should be more accountable to the residents served by such agencies. Direct election of agency members might improve accountability but it would probably result in a general purpose metropolitan level of government which the AMM opposes. The AMM believes that a revised appointment process is necessary to enhance public accountability and responsiveness - to the residents and local officials in the metropolitan area. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD IMPROVE THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS FOR MEMBERS OF THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE MWCC, RTB AND MPOSC. THE APPOINTMENT PROCESS, AS A MINIMUM, SHOULD INCLUDE: A REQUIREMENT FOR A SPECIFIED FILING PERIOD FOR EACH VACANCY; A REQUIREMENT FOR AN ADEQUATELY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING IN EACH DISTRICT FOR WHICH AN APPOINTMENT IS TO BE MADE INCLUDING CRITERIA FOR SELECTION, CANDIDATE NAMES AND QUALIFICATIONS; A REQUIRMENT THAT ONLY PERSONS WHO HAVE FILED DURING THE FILING PERIOD ARE ELIGIBLE FOR APPOINTMENT; AND A REQUIREMENT FOR MEANINGFUL INVOLVEMENT BY LOCAL OFFICIALS AND LEGISLATORS FROM THE DISTRICT IN WHICH THE APPOINTMENT IS TO BE MADE. LOCAL OFFICIALS SHOULD NOT BE PRECLUDED FROM SERVING ON THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. D -3 UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES - .METROPOLITAN AGENCIES The Governor's Commission to review the MWCC made several recommendations with respect to administrative type problems associated with the MWCC. It is possible that some of these problems may also be inherent in the other metropolitan type agencies. These agencies all have one item in common: their governing bodies are selected by appointment and are not directly accountable to the residents of the metropolitan area. Uniform administrative procedures concerning such things as personnel -42- practices, nepotism, procedures for awarding contracts, a code of ethics, etc. should be developed and implemented. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT LEGISLATION WHICH RESULTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR THE METROPOLITAN AGENCIES (METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, MWCC, RTB, MTC). AN ADEQUATELY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING SHOULD BE HELD PRIOR TO FINAL ADOPTION OF THE UNIFORM PROCEDURES. D -4 LOCAL - REGIONAL CONFLICT RESOLUTION MECHANISM One of the issues addressed by the Legislative Commission on Metropolitan Governance in its final report relates to the need for a mechanism whereby intergovernmental disputes in the metropolitan area can be resolved. Three governmental alternatives for dispute resolution were considered: (1) judical review; (2) administrative procedure; and (3) legislative review. Persuaded that court proceedings are not the best means of settling most intergovernmental disputes, the Commission focused most of its attention upon the other two alternatives. With regard to administrative proceedings, either of the rule- making or contested case variety, the Commission concluded that they are no better suited to the needs of governmental adversaries than courtroom proceedings. Reasoning that Administrative Procedures Act (APA) proceedings --are not generally appropriate to the types of functions performed- -by metropolitan agencies, the Commission concluded that the Legislature should apply the APA process only on a case -by -case basis after careful consideration. The Commission concluded that the third forum, the Legislature, is the-one that should be relied upon and that the Legislature should consider means of improving, legitimitizing and regularizing access to the legislative forum for disputes which cannot properly be. resolved at the metropolitan level. To this end, the Commission indicated its support of program evaluation as a method of exposing and resolving the policy issues which give rise to many such disputes. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT INTERVENE IN MOST METROPOLITAN LEVEL - LOCAL LEVEL DISPUTES, BUT WE DO RECOMMEND THAT THE LEGISLATURE 'ESTABLISH AN ADMINISTRATIVE TYPE PROCEDURE BY STATUTE FOR DISPUTED CASES INVOLVING THE INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF METROPOLITAN LEVEL POLICIES IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS INVOLVING A LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT. IV -E RAPID DEVELOPMENT IN COUNTIES ADJACENT TO THE METROPOLITAN AREA There has been a noticeable increase in recent years in -43- development activities in the counties adjacent to the metropolitan area and analysis of this development will likely reveal the beginning stages of growth problems similar to the problems which prompted the establishment of the Development Framework and Mandatory Land Planning Act in the metropolitan area. In fact, the development in adjacent counties may accelerate due to the controlled growth policies within the metropolitan area. To correct any undersirable growth patterns which may cause the unnecessary development or expansion of public service systems such as water, wastewater treatment and transportation facilitis, etc. in the area, and the negative impact that that development may have upon the metropolitan area, the Association recommends that: THE LEGISLATURE DESIGNATE A STATE AGENCY TO MONITOR AND ASSESS URBAN DEVELOPMENT IN THOSE ADJACENT COUNTIES AND REPORT TO THE LEGISLATURE AND THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE NEGATIVE IMPACT OF SUCH URBAN DEVELOPMENT. THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE THE TOOLS NECESSARY TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM IF THE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT INDICATES THAT A PROBLEM EXISTS. IF THE PROBLEM SOLUTION REQUIRES PUBLIC INVESTMENT, THEN THE COSTS" SHOULD BE BORNE BY THE BENIFITTING AREA INCLUDING SUCH HIDDEN COSTS AS HIGHER TAXES, UTILITY FEES, TRANSPORTATION, ETC. EVENTHOUGH THE AREA OF CONCERN IS NOT PART OF THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA; DUE TO THE POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE METROPOLITAN AREA, THE METROPOLITAN COUN -CIL SHOULD ASSIST AND COORDINATE WITH THE DESIGNATED STATE AGENCY IN THIS EVALUATION. IV -F MINNESOTA INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Presidential Executive Order No. 12372 as amended by Executive Order No. 12416 eliminates the Federal A -95 Review Process and authorizes each state to establish its own process. Minnesota Sessions Laws 1983, Chapter 289, Section 49 authorized the State Planning Agency to adopt a state process.. Such review and state processes must be recognized by the Federal Agencies. A State Inter Governmental Review of Federal Programs process was adopted in 1984 and appears to be satisfactory. Any revision to the state process should be consistent with the principles listed below. F -1 GUIDELINES FOR STATE PROCESS fHE STATE PROCESS (PROCEDURES) MUST BE APPLICABLE AND CONSISTENT ON A STATEWIDE BASIS WITH SPECIFIED CRITERIA TO DETERMINE WHICH -44- /% FEDERAL PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS AND PROJECTS ARE SUBJECT TO THE INTER- GOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS. PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS SHOULD NOT BE ADDED OR DELETED FROM THE LIST WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE. F -2 REGIONAL REVIEW AGENCY THE REGIONAL AGENCIES REVIEW AUTHORITY, SHOULD BE LIMITED TO JUDGING THE PROGRAMS, PROPOSALS, PROJECTS CONSISTENCY WITH REGIONAL PLANS, GOALS AND POLICIES. NO PREFERENCE OR PRIORITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WHICH EXCEED THE REGIONAL OR STATE REQUIREMENTS AS OPPOSED TO THOSE PROJECTS, PROGRAMS OR PROPOSALS WHICH MEET THE REGIONAL OR STATE REQUIREMENTS. EACH PROGRAM PROJECT PROPOSAL SHOULD BE REVIEWED PRIMARILY ON ITS OWN MERITS AND THE REGIONAL REVIEWING AGENCY SHOULD DOCUMENT ITS REASONS FOR CONSIDERING FACTORS NOT DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THE PROGRAM, PROJECT, PROPOSAL. F -3 NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS, SHOULD BE AS STRINGENT AS THOSE FORMERLY REQUIRED BY A -95. IV -G COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS Regional, state, and federal governmental levels require'a variety of special - purpose and environmental reviews for proposed development projects. Each of these reviews represents a response to a perceived need or a public concern. Environmental reviews can cause significant delay which creates uncertainty and sometimes higher costs to the developer and ultimately the consumer. The process of environmental review can also be abused frivolously. Improvements have been made to simplify the state environmental review process, administered by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB). In 1976, the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was introduced. To aid in determining whether a proposed action has potential for significant environmental effects that would require the thorough evaluation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). In most cases, an EIS is not required, and the environmental review process is complete when the EAW is cleared. A more recent change has shifted the responsibility for most EIS preparation to local units of government. We commend the Legislature and the EQB for taking these positive steps to simplify and streamline the environmental review process and further believe that another step would be to incorporate more of the environmental review process into the local planning process. Each metropolitan area community must prepare a comprehensive plan; the local plan is an excellent vehicle for such an approach. -45- THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT OF ALLOWING LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND ORDINANCES WHICH CONTAIN ACCEPTABLE ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS TO BE USED TO SATISFY ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES ADDRESSED IN THE EAW AND EIS PROCESS. FURTHER, THE ENTIRE STATE'S ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY SYSTEM SHOULD BE STREAMLINED IN SUCH A MANNER TO ENABLE A "ONE -STOP" PERMIT SYSTEM FOR ALL STATE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. IV -H COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING - LOCAL AND REGIONAL INTERACTION Implementation of the legislation passed in 1976 mandating the completion of local and regional comprehensive plans is nearly complete. However, it must be recognized that planning is an ongoing process, and several precepts should be kept in mind by local units of government, the Metropolitan Agencies, and the State as this planning process continues during the 1980's. METROPOLITAN SYSTEM PLANS, AS WELL AS REGIONAL PLANS FOR THE PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS PROVIDING FOR ORDERLY AND MANAGED GROWTH, MUST CONTINUE TO BE SUFFICIENTLY SPECIFIC IN TERMS OF LOCATIONS, CAPACITIES, AND TIMING TO ALLOW FOR CONSIDERATION IN LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING. THE REGIONAL INVESTMENT IN METROPOLITAN PHYSICAL SERVICE SYSTEMS TRANSPORTATION, WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT, AIRPORTS, AND PARK AND JPEN SPACE) SHOULD CONTINUE TO BE PROTECTED BY PREVENTING ADVERSE IMPACT ON THESE SYSTEMS DUE TO LACK OF INTEGRATION BETWEEN REGIONAL AND LOCAL PLANNING. LOCAL OFFICIALS MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE INPUT INTO THE REGIONAL PLANNING PROCESS ON AN-ONGOING BASIS. DESIGNATION OF OTHER PLANS AS METROPOLITAN SYSTEMS PLANS SHOULD NOT BE MADE . UNLESS THERE IS A COMPELLING METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE PROBLEM OR CONCERN THAT CAN ONLY BE SOLVED THROUGH A REGIONAL SYSTEM. IV -I REZONING REQUIREMENTS - CITIES OF THE FIRST CLASS The State Municipal Planning Act sets forth special requirements for rezoning in Cities of the First Class. Land can be rezoned only with a consent petition. approved by two - thirds. of the property owners within 100 feet of the property to be rezoned or by a 1140 -acre study ". In effect, neighboring property owners have more power over rezoning than the elected city officials. Also, this causes a problem for the cities of the first class in meeting the requirements of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. THEREFORE THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING ACT BE "EVISED TO MAKE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN CITIES OF THE IRST CLASS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR REZONING IN -46- u CITIES OF THE SECOND, THIRD, AND FOURTH CLASS. IV -J METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BUDGET The Metropolitan Council has an annual budget of several million dollars and impacts the two million people living in the metropolitan area. The residents have the right to know how their money is being spent; therefore, the annual budget is a tremendously important document. It should convey enough information so that the residents can determine what product is being produced and how much the product costs. Also the budget should be prepared early enough in the annual adoption process so that the residents can provide meaningful input as to program activities and program priorities. The Metropolitan Council has taken steps to improve its budget process and we commend them for this. The following suggestions are made to help the Council upgrade its budget'process further. J -1 BUDGET DETAIL AND SPECIFICITY As noted, the Annual Budget and Work Program has been improved in recent years to contain more detail and specificity which enables interest groups to make more reasoned recommendations. Further improvements should be made. MANDATED OR NON DISCRETIONARY PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED. PROJECTS, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES WHICH-MAY BE DISCRETIONARY BUT ARE TOTALLY FUNDED BY A FEDERAL OR STATE GRANT SHOULD ALSO BE IDENTIFIED. MORE INFORMATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED AS TO PREVIOUS YEARS EXPENDITURES FOR ON -GOING PROGRAMS, PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. J -Z- POST HEARING BUDGET INCREASES In at least each of the last two years, the Council has significantly increased its budget several months into the budget year. The AMM believes this detracts significantly from the official open budget process and should not become an annual occurrence. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD REVIEW ITS TOTAL BUDGET PROCESS SO THAT IT HAS APPROPRIATE FACTUAL INFORMATION AT THE TIME IT ADOPTS THE ANNUAL BUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM TO PRECLUDE THE NEED FOR MAJOR BUDGET AMENDMENTS AFTER INITIAL ADOPTION. IF BUDGET AMENDMENTS ARE NECESSARY, THE COUNCIL SHOULD ENSURE THAT THE AMENDMENT PROCESS. PROVIDES ADEQUATE NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND THAT THE PUBLIC BE PROVIDED THE OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT. J -3 RELIANCE ON PROPERTY TAXES The AMM is concerned by the growing reliance on the property tax -47- to support Council activities. Federal grants used to fund about two /thi_rds__of the. Council Budget and the local property) tax about one - third. The ratio is now reversed. Property taxes are already considered to be very high by some persons in the metropolitan area and major efforts should be made to hold the line on increases. THE COUNCIL SHOULD MAKE A THOROUGH EXAMINATION OF THE ACTIVITIES FORMERLY FUNDED BY FEDERAL GRANTS TO DETERMINE IF THEY ARE STILL NECESSARY AND WORTHWHILE WHEN ONLY LOCAL DOLLARS ARE INVOLVED. THE COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO SEEK TO BE INCLUDED IN THE STATE FUNDING PROGRAM THAT PROVIDES SOME FUNDING FOR THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONS IN RURAL MINNESOTA WHICH PERFORM MANY SIMILAR TASKS. ADDITIONALLY THE COUNCIL SHOULD SEEK TO DIVEST ITSELF OF SERVICES THAT IT PERFORMS FOR THIS AREA, IF, SUCH SERVICES ARE PERFORMED BY STATE AGENCIES FOR RURAL MINNESOTA. J -4 CASH RESERVE FUND Based on an analysis of the proposed 1985 Metropolitan Council Budget Document it appears that the cash reserve fund is larger than is needed for cash flow purposes. However, since sufficient information is not contained in the budget document as to cash flow needs and when income is to, be received, it" is impossible to determine how much reserves are necessary. THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SHOULD SEEK RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ITS AUDITOR AS TO WHAT THE APPROPRIATE LEVEL OF CASH RESERVES SHOULD BE. THE COUNCIL SHOULD ALSO SEEK ADVICE AS TO HOW THESE RESERVES SHOULD BE IDENTIFIED AND ACCOUNTED FOR IN ITS BUDGET PROCESS AND DOCUMENTATION. IV -K SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) The charge is levied against all building units within the sewer service area whether or not these units will connect to a metropolitan sewer facility. Sewer service area boundaries basically follow municipal boundaries when some portion of a city is connected to a sewer facility. The Development Framework established a Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line different from and in many cases, inside the sewer service area boundaries creating the situation where SAC is levied against units which will not be served within the foreseeable planning future. The current funding boundaries are inconsistent with Development Framework policy. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT A THOROUGH EVALUATION SHOULD BE MADE OF THE :EWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE (SAC) TO DETERMINE IF IT IS FAIR, EQUITABLE AND RELEVANT RECOGNIZING THAT MANY CHANGES HAVE OCCURRED AND PRESENT CONDITIONS ARE QUITE DIFFERENT THAN THEY WERE IN THE -48- . , j EARLY 1970'S WHEN THE SAC WAS ESTABLISHED. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE SITUATION WHERE THE SEWER SERVICE AREA BOUNDARY IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE MUSA BOUNDARY. THIS EVALUATION SHOULD BE COORDINATED AND /OR DIRECTED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL. IV -L METROPOLITAN PARKS AND OPEN SPACE FUNDING The 1974 Metropolitan Parks and Open Space Act established the Metropolitan Parks and Open Space system and provided state /regional fiscal support for acquisition and development of the regional park system. Also the Act provided a "payment in lieu of taxes" to local units of government on a decreasing basis over a four year period. This "payment in lieu of taxes" was to lessen the immediate impact of property taken off the tax rolls for regional park purposes. Funding for the operations and maintenance of regional parks was and is the responsibility of the implementing agencies (counties and cities). L -1 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Due to increased usage, a leveling of state aids and the impact of levy limit restrictions, it is becoming increasingly difficult fo the implementing agencies to operate and maintain these regiona. facilities. Furthermore, regional parks provide the same basic function in the metropolitan area as state parks provide in outstate Minnesota and State funding is provided for operation -and maintenance of state parks. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT STATE OR REGIONAL FUNDS BE PROVIDED TO IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES TO HELP FUND THE MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION COSTS FOR THE REGIONAL PARKS AND OPEN SPACE SYSTEM. THE STATE /REGIONAL FUNDS SHOULD BE IN THE FORM OF A CONTINUING REVENUE SOURCE NOT DEPENDENT UPON BIENNIAL LEGISLATIVE APPROPRIATION AND PREFERRABLY FROM A SOURCE OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY TAR. A FAIR AND EQUITABLE FORMULA FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE STATE /REGIONAL FUNDS SHOULD'BE DEVELOPED. THE REGIONAL PARKS SHOULD REMAIN UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES. L -2 FUNDING FOR IMPACTS OF REGIONAL PARKS ON HOST COMMUNITIES Except for the four year "payment in lieu of taxes; no provision was made to mitigate the continuing cost impacts of a regional park facility on a "host community ", when such community 'is not the owner of the facility. The cost impacts include such items as increased public safety costs, street and road maintenance, litter cleanup, permanent loss of tax revenues, etc. THE AMM. RECOMMENDS THAT AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIVING REGIONAL 01 STATE FUNDING FOR A REGIONAL PARK FACILITY, THE FACILITY OWNER AND OPERATOR MUST NEGOTIATE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE HOST COMMUNITY TO -49- 4 . REIMBURSE IT FOR THE COST IMPACTS ON THE HOST COMMUNITY. IV -M SURFACE WATER The Legislature in 1982 adopted a Surface Water Management Act for the 7- county metropolitan area. The Act as passed and amended in 1984 addressed most of the concern raised by the AMM and 'we do not see the need for major new legislation at this point in time. If the Legislature considers a bill for the balance of the state or if changes are contemplated for the metropolitan area, such legislation should not diminish emphasis on the following principles: THE COST TO LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT FOR PLANNING AND .IMPLEMENTING THIS ACT MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE OF LEVY LIMITS AND ADDITIONAL MANDATES PLACED ON LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE FULLY FUNDED BY STATE RAISED REVENUES. A METROPOLITAN AREA WIDE AD VALORUM PROPERTY TAX SHOULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED TO PAY FOR SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT (PLANNING, PROJECTS, MAINTENANCE) EXCEPT FOR REGIONAL PLANNING OR PROJECTS THAT ARE JUDGED TO BE OF METROPOLITAN SIGNIFICANCE PER M.S. 473.173. THE AUTHORITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ASSIGNED TO THE VARIOUS UNITS AND LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT BY THE 1982 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT ACT SEEM TO BE IN GOOD BALANCE AND SHOULD ALLOW FOR EFFECTIVE EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT OF SURFACE WATER. THESE AUTHORITIES AND REPONSIBILITIES SHOULD NOT BE CHANGED UNLESS THE SYSTEM DELINEATED IN THIS ACT PROVES UNWORKABLE. LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN THE 7- COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA SHOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ANY STATE -WIDE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT GRANT PROGRAM WHICH MAY BE ESTABLISHED AS PART OF A STATEWIDE PROGRAM. IV -N HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT The problem of regulating, controlling and disposing of hazardous materials in an environmentally sound manner is one of the major issues of this decade both nationally and locally. Major state legislation addressing this issue was enacted in 1980, 181, 182 and 183. These legislative acts, responded to the concerns and issues .raised by the AMM and we commend the legislature for its action. The cumulative affect of the legislation was the establishment of an on-going management and control system for the handling and disposal of hazardous materials where responsibility is centralized at the state level but requires the cooperation and support of all levels of government. The AMM does not perceive the need for additional legislation or major changes to existing legislation at the present time. However, any future legislation that may be considered should enhance and not diminish emphasis on the following principles: -1 EFFECTIVE PLANNING -50- 4 1 q PARTIES OR AGENCIES WHO GENERATE HAZARDOUS WASTE SHOULD BE INVOLVED IN ALL PHASES OF PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING THE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL SYSTEM. N -2 ABATEMENT - REDUCTION - RESOURCE RECOVERY .GENERATORS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO MODIFY THEIR PRODUCTION PROCESSES TO RE -USE, RECOVER /RECYCLE AS MUCH HAZARDOUS WASTE AS POSSIBLE AND TO USE LESS HAZARDOUS RAW MATERIALS IN THEIR MANUFACTURING PROCESSES. ENCOURAGEMENT COULD BE GIVEN THRU INCENTIVES /DISCINCENTIVIES. N -3 HANDLING, STORAGE, DISPOSAL ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THE "HAZARDOUS WASTE STREAM" (FROM GENERATION TO DISPOSAL) MUST BE REQUIRED TO HANDLE WASTE IN A MANNER THAT WILL ASSURE THAT THESE WASTES ARE PROPERLY IDENTIFIED, COLLECTED, TREATED, TRANSPORTED, ETC. AND ULTIMATELY DISPOSED OF IN A SAFE MANNER. N -4 PRIVATE OWNERSHIP THE PRIVATE SECTOR SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO OWN, OPERATE AND MANAG HAZARDOUS WASTE PROCESSING, TREATMENT, STORAGE AND DISPOSA, FACILITIES UNDER STRINGENT STATE REGULATION AND LICENSING AND BACKED BY STATE LIABILITY. UNDERGROUND OR IN- GROUND BURIAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTES SHOULD ONLY BE USED.AS A LAST RESORT AND IF'-THIS BECOMES NECESSARY, THE PRIME CRITERIA FOR SITE SELECTION SHOULD BE GEOLOGICAL ACCEPTABILITY AND SAFETY. N -5 COMPENSATION - INCENTIVES FOR HOST COMMUNITIES COMPENSATION SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO HOST COMMUNITIES SIMILAR TO THE COMPENSATION PROVIDED FOR SOLID WASTE LANDFILLS. N -6 EXISTING SITE CLEAN -UP AND LIABILITY THE MPCA SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED TO PROCEED POST HASTE TO CLEAN -UP AND DECONTAMINATE THE EXISTING HAZARDOUS WASTE SITES BEFORE THERE IS FURTHER DAMAGE TO PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT. IF A RESPONSIBLE PARTY CAN BE IDENTIFIED, THAT PARTY SHOULD BE LIABLE FOR CLEAN -UP COSTS AND PERSONAL INJURY DAMAGES AS DEFINED IN LAW. IF A RESPONSIBLE PARTY CANNOT BE IDENTIFIED, THEN THE CLEAN -UP SHOULD BE FINANCED BY THE STATE SUPERFUND AND THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ASSURE THAT THERE ARE ADEQUATE FUNDS TO DO SUCH CLEAN -UP. IV -0 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT IN THE METROPOLITAN AREA The Waste Management Act of 1980 and as amended by the Legislature in 1981, 1982, 1983 and 1984 clarified and redefined the roles and responsibilities of various levels of government with respect to -51- managing the solid waste stream within the 7- county metropolitan area. The solid waste system in place in the 7- county area is basically a three - tiered system whereby cities control and regulate collection; counties are responsible for 'siting' new landfills, developing abatement plans and regulating existing landfills; and the Metropolitan Council has regional planning and coordinating responsibilities. The system was intended to foster and encourage abatement, recycling and resource recovery for as much of the waste stream as possible and then to assure environmentally sound landfill disposal for the remaining solid waste. Maximum cooperation and coordination among and between the various levels and units of government and the private sector is needed if the system is to work as intended. The system has not been entirely implemented as yet, but it appears to be working although there is a growing concern that not enough attention and - emphasis has been given to abatement, recycling, and resource recovery type activities. 0 -1. ALTERNATIVES TO LANDFILLS All levels and units of government and the private sector should participate and cooperate in planning and managing the solid waste stream to assure a cost efficient and environmentally sound solid ►aste disposal system. Landfilling should only be used as a last resort and then only for "processed" solid waste or for those materials which can not be recycled, reused, or disposed of in -. another manner. THE AMM STRONGLY ENDORSES ABATEMENT, RECYCLING AND RESOURCE RECOVERY ACTIVITIES AND PROGRAMS TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR IN- GROUND DISPOSAL OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE. THE AMM WOULD SUPPORT EVENTUAL PROHIBITION OF DISPOSAL OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE IN LANDFILLS PROVIDED THAT COST EFFICIENT ALTERNATIVES ARE DEVELOPED AND FUNDING IS PROVIDED TO CITIES TO IMPLEMENT THEIR ASSIGNED RESPONSIBILITIES IN A REVISED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 0,2 COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVES FOR HOST - COMMUNITIES Solid waste disposal facilities have many undesireable impacts on the "host" communities and they should be compensated for all direct and indirect costs associated with the undesireable impacts such a facility has on the community. Direct costs include such things as fire protection, water and sewer services, buffer zone design and amenities, litter clean -up, etc. indirect costs include such items as road maintenance, monitoring costs, end use planning and city administrative costs associated with the facility. Effective January 1, 1985 the host communities for landfills are authorized to charge a fee up to 15 cents per cubic yard as compensation for these impacts. THE AMM SUPPORTS THIS AUTHORIZATION AND BELIEVES IT SHOULD BE -52- CONTINUED. AS OTHER MAJOR SOLID WASTE PROCESSING FACILITIES GO ON LINE (SUCH AS INCINERATION TYPE FACILITIES) , THE IMPACT OF THESE FACILITIES ON THE HOST COMMUNITIES SHOULD BE CAREFULLY MONITORED TO DETERMINE IF THEY ALSO HAVE SIGNIFICANT UNDESIREABLE IMPACT AS OPPOSED TO BENEFITS. IF SO, SOME FORM OF COMPENSATION MAY ALSO BE NECESSARY FOR THOSE COMMUNITIES. 0 -3 FUNDING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, PERSONAL AND PROPERTY DAMAGES Studies conducted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the Minnesota Health Department have indicated that most, if not all, landfills in the metropolitan area are causing ground water contamination problems. How significant these problems are or what the impacts will be is largely undetermined at this point in time. Effective January 1, 1985 some proceeds from a surtax on solid waste going into landfills will go into a fund dedicated to help solve pollution type problems. THE AMM SUPPORTS THIS SURTAX AND BELIEVES IT SHOULD BE CONTINUED. THE PROCEEDS FROM THIS TAX SHOULD PROVIDE HELP TO PERSONS OR COMMUNITIES INJURED OR DAMAGED BY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS CAUSED BY LANDFILL CONTAMINATION. (I.E. REAL OR PERSONAL PROPERTY DAMAGE, PERSONAL INJURIES, CLEAN -UP ACTIVITIES, ALTERNATIVE WATE' SUPPLIES, ETC..). COUNTIES MUST EXERCISE THEIR STATUTOR. RESPONSIBILITIES TO ASSURE THAT LANDFILLS ARE INSPECTED AND OPERATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND COUNTY REQUIREMENTS 0 -4 COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES Counties have the major responsibilities for managing and implementing the solid waste disposal system. There are some who feel that the counties have not been as aggressive as they should have been in decreasing this area's reliance on landfills as the only viable disposal methods There has been some discussion of establishing a new metro type, organization to take over the county responsibilities. The counties feel that a lack of funding is to blame and effective January 1, 1985 are authorized to charge a surtax of 25 cents per cubic yard of solid waste to help pay for alternatives to land disposal. THE AMM SUPPORTS THIS COUNTY SURTAX AUTHORIZATION AND DOES NOT SUPPORT THE CREATION OF A NEW AGENCY TO ASSUME THE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES. THE AMM URGES THE COUNTIES TO RAPIDLY DEVELOP PREFERRED DISPOSAL TECHNIQUES WHICH ARE ENVIRONMENTALLY SOUND AND COST EFFICIENT. CITIES SHOULD COOPERATE WITH THE COUNTIES IN DEVELOPING AND IMPLEMENTING PREFERRED DISPOSAL TECHNIQUES AND PROGRAMS (I.E. ABATEMENT, RECYCLING, INCINERATION FOR ENERGY, COMPOSTING, ETC.). 0 -5 TRANSFER STATION RULES AND REGULATIONS -53- If Metropolitan Counties are given the power to acquire, by purchase, lease, gift or condemnation solid waste facilities or properties which includes transfer stations. Acquisition is permitted without compliance with local land use ordinances. Metropolitan cities have no protection, except through a review process, from improvident designation of transfer station sites. THE AMM RECOMMENDS THAT THE LEGISLATURE PLACE A MORATORIUM ON TRANSFER SITE SELECTION UNTIL ADEQUATE AND REASONABLE REGULATIONS OR RULES HAVE BEEN PROMULGATED BY THE MPCA AND OTHER STATE AGENCIES WHICH WILL CONSIDER THE SITE WITH RESPECT TO LOCAL LAND USE CONTROLS AND THE PROTECTION OF THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE AFFECTED CITIES. THE RULES OR REGULATIONS SHOULD NOT BECOME EFFECTIVE UNTIL ALL AFFECTED CITIES HAVE HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW SUCH RULES AND TO COMMENT ON THEIR ADEQUACY. 0 -6 REGULATION OF DISPOSAL RATES Through a variety of conditions and reasons such as solid waste districting, government control, regulated collections, and centralized private ownership of disposal facilities; solid waste disposal choices might become more non - competitive and monopolistic in nature. THE AMM BELIEVES THAT SHOULD SUCH A CONDITION OCCUR, A RATE REGULATION MECHANISM FOR TIPPING (DROP) CHARGES AND COLLECTION CHARGES SHOULD BE DEVELOPED BY THE LEGISLATURE. 0 -7 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FEES Minnesota Statues, 1984, Chapter 644 authorized and /or mandated a three tiered system of fees on solid waste to be disposed of in landfills. The theory behind the authorization of those fees was that those who produce solid waste should pay the true costs of disposal. Many of the costs of solid waste disposals are hidden, unknown or paid for by persons and units of government not responsible for the production of such waste. THE AMM SUPPORTS THE CONCEPT THAT THE PRODUCERS OF SOLID WASTE SHOULD PAY THE TRUE AND FULL COSTS OF SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AND COMMENDS THE LEGISLATURE FOR ITS FORWARD LOOKING INITIATIVES DURING THE 1984 SESSION. THE AMM WOULD .SUPPORT MODIFICATIONS TO THE SURTAX OR DISPOSAL FEE SYSTEM WHICH WOULD PROVIDE MORE INCENTIVE TO REDUCE THE VOLUME OF UNPROCESSED SOLID WASTE TO BE DISPOSED OF IN LANDFILLS. -54- V TRANSPORTATION V -A MNDOT HIGHWAY FUNDING An efficient transportation system is a vital element in planning for physical, economic, and social development at state, regional, and local levels Because of extremely high inflation, decreasing state revenues from decreasing gasoline sales, and federal cutbacks in the early 1980,s MNDOT delayed a substantial number of projects in the state and metropolitan, area. In the last legislative biennium, this problem was substantially corrected with additional funding. THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF FUNDS SO THAT NECESSARY HIGHWAY MAINTENANCE MAY BE CONTINUED, NECESSARY ADDITIONAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION MAY OCCUR,AND THE MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAY FUND LEVEL IS ADEQUATE. ANY INCREASE IN OR CHANGE IN FUNDING FOR HIGHWAY PURPOSES SHOULD GO INTO THE HIGHWAY TRUST FUND. V -B MNDOT TRANSIT FUNDING MNDOT,by Legislative action and funding, is a major contributor to statewide transit programs. This is especially true in the Metropolitan Area where approximately 80% of the total transit funds are spent. This imbalance is more than offset by the fact that a majority of the highway funding is channeled to rural Minnesota. Because of the large economically diverse population but rather compact nature of the Twin City Metropolitan Area, it is an absolute necessity to provide an effective and .efficient public transit service with a variety of programs,such as Rideshare and Project Mobility to protect the economic viability of the area. Without a good transit system, the Metropolitan Highway system would not just be crowded, it would be totally inadequate. Many elderly and handicapped persons residing in the area primarily because of access to unique services would be almost totally immobile. Finally, due'to statutory constraints, there are no funding resources available for other units of government to pick up the difference if the programs-are allowed to deteriorate. Based on 1984 legislation, some of these programs will be transferred to the new Regional Transit Board (RTB). THE AMM REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT PROGRAMS AS VERY HIGH PRIORITY AND FUND THEM SUFFICIENTLY TO MAINTAIN AT LEAST THE CURRENT SERVICE LEVEL. V -C REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD (RTB) The 1984 legislation creating the Regional Transit Board provided resolution to many of the apparent problems associated with the MTC as the major Metropolitan Transit Provider planning and coordinating the entire transit needs of the area. Although the legislation recognized that subregional and developing area needs were important, it did not mandate solutions but gave the RTB the authority to establish advisory bodies and planning groups as -55- necessary. The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) made up of ten (10) municipal officials, 7 county officials, and a number of other persons representing the public and various metropolitan agencies has as part of its duties, fulfilled the role of advising the Metropolitan Council and MTC on Transit Funding and Policy Issues for many years. This advisory function should continue. THE AMM ENCOURAGES THE RTB TO USE THE CURRENT TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD FOR INPUT ON METROPOLITAN TRANSIT FUNDING AND POLICY ISSUES AS WELL AS TO ESTABLISH. A REGIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF LOCAL OFFICIALS FROM THE DEVELOPING SUBREGIONS TO PROVIDE INPUT TO THE TRANSIT PLANNING PROCESS AND TO HELP DEVELOP EFFICIENT COST EFFECTIVE TRANSIT SOLUTIONS FOR THESE AREAS. IN ADDITION THE RTB SHOULD MAKE PROVISION FOR DEVELOPMENT AND FUNDING OF PLANNING COMMITTEES ON A SUBREGION BY SUBREGION OR DESIGNATED AREA BASIS AS DETERMINED BY LOCAL NEEDS TO DEVELOP SPECIFIC TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES FOR THOSE SPECIFIC AREAS. V -D HIGHWAY JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT AND FUNDING The State Highway Study Commission and Metropolitan Jurisdictional Task Force have been studying the possibility of reclassifying many roadways in the state as to appropriate use classifications and jurisdiction. This reassignment in the metropolitan area is estimated to shift $6.1 million annually from the state and $1.2 million annually from the counties to the cities for an increase_ of $7.3 million annually for general maintenance and life cycle treatment (i.e. sealcoat, overlays, etc.). Although, this task may be appropriate, if pursued, it could have a profound effect on city finances and future ability to maintain good road systems, especially if certain criteria are not met and finance alternatives established. Therefore, the AMM offers the following as a guide to continuing discussion and possible legislation. D -1 GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS THE' AMM SUPPORTS JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT OF ROADS BASED ON FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION, SUBJECT TO A- CORRESPONDING MECHANISM FOR FUNDING, SINCE CITIES DO NOT CURRENTLY HAVE THE FINANCIAL CAPACITY TO ABSORB THE ADDITIONAL ROADWAY RESPONSIBILITIES WITHOUT NEW FUNDING SOURCES. THE EXISTING MUNICIPAL TURNBACK FUND IS NOT ADEQUATE BASED ON CONTEMPLATED TURNBACKS. IF A ROAD USER NEEDS STUDY IS UNDERTAKEN, THE AMM RECOMMENDS INCLUSION OF A UNIFORM MEANS OF MEASURING NEEDS AMONG ALL LEVELS OF JURISDICTION; FULL CONSIDERATION OF ALL FUNDING SOURCES AVAILABLE TO EACH LEVEL OF JURISDICTION; AND CONSIDERATION OF LOCAL EFFORTS REPRESENTED BY LOCAL TAX LEVIES, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, DEVELOPER COSTS, ETC. IN THE FORMS OF CREDITS RATHER 'HAN PENALTIES. -56- C ,. is D -2 SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS STATE AID RULES SHOULD BE CHANGED TO ALLOW COUNTIES TO UPGRADE COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAYS USING C.S.A.H. FUNDS PRIOR TO TURNBACK WITH CITY CONCURRENCE AND WITHOUT PENALTY AS IMPOSED BY THE RULES WHEN A STATE OR COUNTY ROADWAY IS TRANSFERRED TO A CITY, INCENTIVE FUNDING SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE FOR IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE. WHEN A STATE OR COUNTY ROADWAY IS TRANSFERRED TO A CITY, THE CITY SHOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF DESIGNATING IT AS A STATE AID ROAD OR LOCAL STREET. IF A CITY CHOOSES TO DESIGNATE A TRANSFERRED ROADWAY AS A NON M.S.A. LOCAL ROAD, FUNDING FOR IMPROVEMENT, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE SHOULD STILL BE PROVIDED. THE AMM SUPPORTS USE OF A PORTION OF THE HIGHWAY MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE INCENTIVE PROGRAM FOR JURISDICTIONAL REASSIGNMENT THE AMM URGES ADOPTION OF A LEVY LIMIT BASE ADJUSTMENT PROVISIOF AS PART OF THE FUNDING PACKAGE FOR ONGOING AND FUTURL OPERATION MAINTENANCE OF JURISDICTIONALLY REASSIGNED ROADWAYS. JURISDICTIONALLY REASSIGNED ROADWAYS DESIGNATED BY A CITY FOR'THE M.S.A. PROGRAM SHOULD BE CONSIDERED SEPERATE FROM AND IN ADDITION TO THE STANDARD DESIGNATION PROCESS SO THAT DEVELOPING CITIES WILL BE ABLE TO CONTINUE DESIGNATING A PERCENTAGE OF NEW ROAD GROWTH TO THE M.S.A. PROGRAM. V -E- STATE AND COUNTY HIGHWAY TURNBACKS Current state law provides that the state and /or county may declassify a trunk highway. and turn it back to a local unit of government. The only provision is that it must be in good condition. The unit receiving the highway does not have the option to refuse title and must, thereafter, maintain the turned back road. The.local unit may add the turnback highway to its MSA highway mileage and even exceed the unit's mileage limit if it is already at its designated limit. This will qualify that particular stretch of street for MSA maintenance funds. However, two problems exist: 1) the maintenance allocation may not be sufficient if the street is a high volume carrier, such as Highway 8 through Ramsey County; and 2) the miles of turnback designated by the local unit as MSA streets will be deducted from the unit's future additional MSA allocation limit, thus forcing the local unit to totally maintain that portion from its local funds or lose the right to determine at its option other local streets as part -57- of the MSA system. THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES .REQUESTS THE LEGISLATURE TO MODIFY THE LAW TO EITHER 1) ALLOW CITIES THE RIGHT TO REFUSE HIGHWAY TURNBACKS FROM THE STATE OR COUNTY, OR 2) ALLOW THE LOCAL UNITS MSA MILE LIMIT TO BE INCREASED BY THE MILES OF TURNBACK WITHOUT AFFECTING FUTURE ALLOCATIONS AND ESTABLISH A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE ALLOCATION FOR TURNED BACK HIGHWAY MILES BASED ON VOLUME OF USAGE. FURTHER, STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR TURNBACK ROADS SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED BY MNDOT IN CONJUNCTION WITH' LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT, AND NOT MEETING THESE STANDARDS BE MADE PART OF THE CRITERIA FOR WHICH A CITY MAY REJECT THE TURNBACK. V -F '3C' TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS - ROLE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS The transportation planning process in the Twin City Metropolitan Area has been developed in response to a variety of federal and state laws and regulations. The Metropolitan Council (MC) was formally designated by the Legislature in 1974 (1974 MRA) as the agency responsible for the administration and coordination of said planning process. Included within this designation is the responsibility for long range comprehensive transportation -Manning required by Section 134 of the Federal Highway Act of 962, Section 4 of Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 and,: Section 112 of Federal Aid Highway Act of 1973, and such other federal transportation laws as may be enacted subsequently. The planning required under the federal laws is commonly referred to as the 13C' process (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative), - and the MC is the metropolitan planning organization (MPO) under federal terminology. Federal law and regulations require that the MPO function as "the forum for cooperative decision making by principal elected officials of general purpose local government" and receipt - of federal financial aid for the planning, construction and operation of transportation improvements in urbanized areas is contingent upon the existence of a planning process which is satisfactory to federal authorities. When the Legislature designated the MC as the transportation planning agency for the metropolitan area, it also mandated the establishment of an "advisory body" to assist the MC and Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC), now Regional Transit Board, in, carrying out their responsibilities. While specific duties were not assigned, the Legislature did specify that the advisory body would consist of citizen representatives, municipal, county, and appropriate state agency representatives. This advisory body is now called the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) and contains 17 local elected officials among its membership of about 30 officials. The MC has consistently viewed the role of TAB as an advisory body based on the 1974 MRA. Hence, local elected "ficials in this area do not play as vital a role in the aderally mandated '3C' transportation planning process as was I .� 9/ r i •'% intended by federal law and regulation. Although, the Federal Regulations no longer require exclusive local official representation as the MC, they still maintain local official involvement in the MC and '3C' process. In addition, the current elected official participation and 13C' process has worked reasonably well in this Metropolitan Area. THE AMM SUPPORTS AS A MINIMUM THE CONTINUATION OF THE CURRENT LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS INVOLVEMENT IN THE '3C' PROCESS. IF MODIFICATION IS CONSIDERED, THE AMM URGES GREATER LOCAL OFFICIAL INPUT IN THE SELECTION PROCESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AGENCY. V -G METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM FUNDING A good effective and efficient Public Transportation Service is vital to the Metropolitan Area. The existing Highway System could not handle the pressure of a reduced transit system. The elderly, handicapped and lower income persons depend on public transit for job transportation and service accessibility. The business and industrial community would suffer extreme economic setbacks if workers and shoppers were denied public transit. Finally, the state economy as a whole could suffer reduced income and sales tax revenues, if public transit in the metropolitan area is allowed to deteriorate. THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE LEGISLATURE AND RTB TO ADOPT PROGRAM AND FUNDING ALTERNATIVES UTILIZING THE STATE GENERAL FUND, MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX, PROPERTY TAX,FAREBOX, AND SERVICE EFFICIENCIES TO ENSURE A GOOD EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT METROPOLITAN PUBLIC TRANSIT SYSTEM WHICH CAN PROVIDE SERVICE EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN EXISTING SERVICE. V -H TAXI CAB REGULATIONS The Taxi Cab industry is currently licensed and regulated on a city by city basis with each city providing its own set of fees and regulations. A citizens League study entitled "TAXIS: Solutions in the City; A New Future in the Suburbs," recommends much deregulation and license authority vested with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. One of the major thrusts behind the Citizens League proposal is to free up the taxi industry into a more competitive private business and attempt through this procedure to create a climate whereby cabs and cities could provide increased opportunity for rideshare programs and other vitally needed transportation opportunities, especially in the suburbs. In addition, bills have been introduced in the legislature transferring regulatory and licensing authority from cities to the MTC. However, neither the Citizens League document nor the bills address the complex problems associated with -59- l9 A 9 providing reasonable services to outlying areas or less desireable districts of some communities. Even if a degree of deregulation is advisable, some regulation will always be needed making it necessary to determine who and how to enforce such regulations. Since past attempts for central regulation and licensing have not been successful, new legislation will be proposed which will designate the Regional Transit Board as the agency to develop uniform regulations, procedures, fare ceilings, etc., and oversee municipal licensing. H -1 UNIFORM REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES THE AMM DOES NOT OPPOSE DEVELOPMENT OF A UNIFORM LICENSING PROCESS AND UNIFORM RULES AND PROCEDURES FOR REGULATION OF TAXI CABS WITH LOCAL CONTROL AND LICENSING REMAINING A MUNICIPAL FUNCTION. THE REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD IS AN APPROPRIATE AGENCY TO DEVELOP UNIFORM RULES AND TO COORDINATE AND MONITOR THE PROCESS. H -2 CENTRAL LICENSING IF LEGISLATION PROGRESSES WHICH WOULD REMOVE LOCAL AUTHORITY TO REGULATE AND LICENSE TAXI CABS, THE AMM MEMBERSHIP AUTHORIZES THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO ADOPT POLICY DELINEATING SPECIFIC CRITERIA AND PROTECTION FOR MUNICIPAL AND GENERAL PUBLIC INTEREST SIMILAR TO 1984 POLICY. H -3 RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS THE AMM WOULD ENCOURAGE CITIES LICENSING TAXI CABS TO DEVELOP RECIPROCAL AGREEMENTS FOR PASSENGER PICK -UP. V -I LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES Light Rail, -as an alternative transit opportunity, is becoming a subject of much concern and is generating a great deal of activity in the Metropolitan Area. The Metropolitan Council modified its Transportation Plan to allow consideration of the issue and completed in March 1981 a state financed preliminary corridor selection criteria study. That study looked at 15 possible corridors and narrowed the list to 6 corridors that might qualify for further feasibility study. It did indicate that University Ave. was a most likely candidate for further study, but lacking funds nothing further was done. MNDOT completed a study, of Hiawatha Ave. and developed an EIS which is currently under Federal review. The Metropolitan Council discovered in August of 1982 that a $500,000 UMTA grant was available for detailed LRT alternative study and submitted a grant application to study the University and SW corridors. The Governor and State Legislature have become increasingly involved in this issue and allocated -everal million dollars for LRT engineering. .I t The AMM is concerned by several issues. The original study is not a corridor selection study but more a criteria development study. Of the two corridors proposed for UMPTA grant study, the SW corridor scored lower than other corridors based on the developed criteria. The UMTA study assumes a corridor selection which does not appear to have been done. The previous study was predominately a staff function and did not go through advisory committees or public hearings to provide input for criteria or other major concerns that have not been addressed. Basically the '3C' (continuous, comprehensive, and cooperative with local elected officials involvement) process has not been initiated in this area as it usually is for Federally funded and other important programs. THE AMM STRONGLY URGES THE GOVERNOR, LEGISLATURE,AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TO CONTINUE THE '3C' PROCESS UTILIZING TAB, TAC, RTB, AND PUBLIC INPUT TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA AND PROCEDURES FOR THE STUDY OF LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AS WELL AS ALL OTHER TRANSIT OPTIONS WHICH COULD BENEFIT THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM. THE PROCESS SHOULD INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SUCH ISSUES AS SPECIFIC TRANSIT ALTERNATIVE SELECTION CRITERIA; OPERATION FUNDING AND CONTROL (PRIVATE, PUBLIC, JOINT POWERS OR A COMBINATION); FUNDING METHODS; AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT WITHIN A CORRIDOR. THESE QUESTIONS AND OTHERS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED SO THAT STANDARDS AND PROCEDURES CAN BE DEVELOPED FOR APPLICATION TO CORRIDOR SELECTION STUDIES AND SPECIFIC TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDIES. PRIOR TO APPROVAL, ALL - ASPECTS OF A PARTICULAR L.R.T. PROPOSAL SHOULD HAVE BEEN STUDIED AND PRESENTED TO THE PUBLIC AND APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL BODIES TO ASSURE A VIABLE SYSTEM. V -J CITY SPEED LIMITS Bills have been introduced in past legislative sessions which would grant cities the authority to set speed limits on city roads and streets. The LMC has policy which supports that authority for cities outside of the seven county metropolitan area. Whereas this policy of local authority for free standing rural or out state cities may be feasible, it could be extremely dangerous and confusing in the metropolitan area. The seven county metropolitan area is made up of 140 continguous cities and a number of townships. Because of the compactness of cities in this area, it is often impossible to determine when one has crossed a boundary from one city to the next. If one city changes its limits, its neighbor would either have to also change or post many additional signs on each street crossing a boundary. This system would be costly, extremely confusing to individuals, and might cause some legal problems in case of accidents. Therefore, THE AMM SUPPORTS SPEED LIMIT CONTROL OF CITY ROADS AND STREETS AS CURRENTLY PROVIDED BY LAW FOR THE METROPOLITAN AREA AND WOULD OPPOSE CHANGES TO GRANT GENERAL SPEED LIMIT CONTROL TO INDIVIDUAL -61- v , CITIES WITHIN THE SEVEN COUNTY METROPOLITAN AREA. V -K MNDOT /CITY COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS The 1984 Legislature modified payment proceedures for projects where the state and city share in the costs through cooperative agreements by .allowing MNDOT to pay as the work proceeds. However, because of work load and the priority system used by MNDOT in preparing and authorizing cooperative agreements, a number of important local projects are being delayed and cites are having to expend large amounts of local funds for land acquistion and project preparations long before the agreement process is completed. THE AMM URGES MNDOT TO REVIEW THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT PROCESS AND INITIATE CHANGES SO THAT MUNICIPAL AGREEMENTS CAN BE EXECUTED IN A TIMELY AND EFFICIENT MANNER. V -L MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX TRANSFER ACCELERATION The Motor Vehicle Excise Tax was significantly increased in the early 1980's and dedicated to the State General Fund to offset the affect of a declining economy and reduced state revenues. The Legislature recognized that Highway and Transit Program needs were growing and that ultimately additional funding would be needed in, these areas. Thus, a transfer of this tax from- General Fund to the Highway and Transit Funds was established starting with 25% in- 1985 and finally reaching 100% in 1992. Recent upward trends in the various state tax revenue collections indicate that the economy is recovering and that more funds from traditional sources should be available for general state government. Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO CONSIDER ACCELERATING THE TRANSFER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE TAX FROM THE GENERAL FUND TO THE HIGHWAY AND TRANSIT FUNDS TO KEEP PACE WITH INCREASING NEEDED EXPENDITURES IN THESE AREAS. V -M BIKEWAY FUNDING The state recently eliminated Grant Funds for Bikeway paths due to the declining economy. However, more people are turning to this form of recreation for both health and economic reasons. For safety it is essential that bike paths be provided along state, county, and city roadways, especially in conjunction with state and regional park systems Therefore, THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REINSTATE THE GRANT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE SAFE BIKEWAY PATHS. -62- Z M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Fred Richards & Leslie Turner SUBJECT: POSSIBLE CITY HALL RELOCATION DATE: November 19, 1984 Attached is a proposed questionnaire (for your review and comment) which we feel would gather information we need before going further with exploration of possible City Hall relocation. We will discuss the overall process on Monday night. FR, LT /sw Attachment D R A F T M E M O R A N D U M TO: All City Departments FROM: Frederick S. Richards and Leslie C. Turner DATE: November 13, 1984 RE: Space Needs In an attempt to obtain background information about the adequacy of City Hall, the Public Works Building and the Fire Station, both now and in the future, we have been asked by the Council to coordinate this study. In that regard, we would ask each department to respond to the following questions. Also, at the end, we would solicit your general comments about your present accomodations, whether they need to be upgraged, expanded, contracted, consolidated with other governmental functions, whether city, school, state, etc. Please be candid and as expansive as you wish. The more data we can gather, the better to assist us in analyzing the future of present City Hall and other City facilities. 1. Name of Department? 2. Number of employees in department? 3. General description of department's pricipal functions? 4. Present amount of square feet the department occupies? Where? 5. Number of employees department would anticipate to have in: 1990 1995 2000 2015 6. Amount of square feet the department believes it needs now (1985) and for the years identified in #5 above? 7. Where is the optiminium location for your department's space now; in the future? B. Functions which your department is not now performing and /or connot adequately perform because of lack of space? 9. Is there present needs to update your space to comply with codes, functions, etc.? If not now, do you envision any in the future? If so, what? And when? 10. Are there ancillary functions not adequately being met associated with your space needs and functions? If so, what? a. Parking. b. Public meetings. C. Storage, filing. 11. Could you perform more effectively with different space? Located elsewhere? If so, please explain. 12. Describe any relationships with other governmental bodies and /or other City departments that would suggest a reorganization of your space needs? 13. Where, in your judgment would be the optimum location for City Hall? 14. Describe those facilities which should be contained in the ideal City Hall. 15. Open Forum - as it pertains to our space needs, tell us what we don't know and /or should have asked about (please limit responde to 5,000 words or less). Thank you very much for devoting time and thought to this questionnaire. We are most seriously soliciting your input. We would also ask that, if possible, these questionnaires be completed and returned to Fred and Less,lie by -2- December 31, 1984. Also, no conclusion should necessarily be drawn about the mere fact of circulating this questionnaire. We are only exploring these ideas and have no conclusions, tentative or otherise, where this inquiry might lead us. Thanks 0436q -3- Leslie Turner and Frederick S. Richards M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: POSSIBLE CITY HALL RELOCATION DATE: October 15, 1984 In response to a request from the Council regarding development of a process to consider the subject of possible City Hall relocation, the following information is submitted. In discussions regarding the subject, it appears that there would be two objectives for relocation of City Hall: 1) The current land that is presently not on the tax rolls be moved to the tax rolls and that the available public space be consolidated. 2) That through the sale and relocation, there would be a net gain in capital dollars through the sale of the property. The following represent issues and /or considerations that a committee ex- ploring such should take into account: a) Determine the market and market value for the presently existing site for City Hall and whether any addition of property and /or present street right -of -way could make the site a more potentially attractive site. b) Whether or not there are any legal restrictions regarding the use of a property for other than a public purpose. c) Identify alternative locations for City Hall, together with the positive and negative aspects of such locations. d) Determine the space requirements-for the existing City Staff, including the Police Department, together with possible remodeling costs at the various sites. e) Identify and weigh selected non -space issues, including such things as community access, location of both City and School District Staff in the same building, etc. It is recommended that the following be used for consideration by a committee: a) Development of objectives and a timetable for consideration. b) Determination of present requirements for both City Hall and School District Staff. October 2, 1984 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Two c) Development of alternatives for relocation of City Hall and /or School District Staff. d) Development of a recommendation to be submitted at a minimum to the City Council and if appropriate to the School District. It is recommended that such an exploratory task force be composed as follows: - One to two Council Members - One to two School District Members - One School District Staff - One City Staff - One to three persons from the community who have a background in real estate and office management At first glance, the following considerations should additionally be taken into account: - Issue of zoning use and /or traffic of alternative City Hall /School District sites and impact on a neighborhood - Issue of compatibility of School District and City Staff, particularly as they relate to the unique functions of each and the compensation that each receives for work performed - Adaptability of currently existing building's to office /City usage - Access of Staff, particularly Police Department response, to areas of the community and areas through which they travel during emergencies - Access of the general public to an alternative location It is recommended that once the Council has adopted a mission statement in desired outline to proceed that it make the appropriate appointments and, if appropriate, that the School District be included in those, and that the committee be given a three to four -month work time to explore the alternatives and come back with a recommendation. KR /sw GENERAL RECOMMENDATION BY AMM Community Index - Should be used only as a planning tool, not a regulatory tool Life Cycle Housing - Should be viewed on a regional basis, not a community basis. Responsibility for Subsidized Housing - Funding should not be the obligation*of the cities Influences of Market Place on Housing - -Metro Council should recognize and discuss the role of the market place over which cities have little control Local Plan _Monitoring - Metro Council should not be an overseer of the imnlemenation of local comprehensive plans COMMUNITY INDEX Replaces Housing Allocation Plan Establishes a ranking which indicates a community's deviation from the regional norm for: - Alternatives for single family homes - Housing of low and modest value Edina's Ranking: Alternatives for single family home: Edina - 35% Regional Goal - 41% Housing of low and modest value R Edina - 25% Regional goal - 63% PROPOSED METRO COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES Taxation - Greater equity for rental housing classification - "Circuit Breaker" should be improved for renters • Preservation of Existing Housing - Region -wide uniform housing maintenance code - Tax relief for housing rehabilitation • Special Needs - More latitude for group homes - Survey of disabled population funded by State • Housing Revenue Bonds - Regional reviews - More stringent requirements for low and moderate income benefit Landlord /Tenant Relations - Housing Court - Civil penalties against landlords Mandatory truth in housing legislation Local Initiatives - Enabling legislation to waive fees, certain standards - State reimbursement for waived local fees - Use of park dedication fees for housing - Increased municipal aids for cost reduction initiatives ORDINANCE NO. 1353 -A1 AN AMENDMENT TO THE ORDINANCE LICENSING AND REGULATING PHYSICAL CULTURE AND HEALTH SERVICES AND CLUBS, REDUCING CLUBS AND SALONS, MASSAGE PARLORS, SAUNA PARLORS, AND ESCORT SERVICES, TO EXEMPT CERTAIN BUSINESSES FROM THE REQUIREMENT TO OBTAIN A LICENSE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Exemption from Business License Requirements. Sec. 2 of Ordinance No. 1353 is hereby amended by adding thereto a new paragraph (c) as follows: "(c) The preceding provisions of this section notwithstanding, no business as described in this section shall be required to obtain a license under this section if it meets all of the following criteria as evidenced by affidavits and other documents, including that set out at 4. below, submitted to and in form and substance reasonably acceptable to the City Clerk: 1. the principal activity of the business shall not be the performance of massage services; 2. the activity of the business is conducted and performed on the business premises; 3. no more than two persons licensed to perform massage services under this ordinance shall perform such massage services at any one time on the business premises; and 4. the annual gross revenue of the business from performing massage services is less than 25% of the total annual gross revenue of the business as shown by financial statements of the kind specified in Section 4 (a) 10 of this ordinance." Section 2. There is hereby added to paragraph (a) of Section 4, a new subparagraph 10 as follows: "10. A financial statement, certified as being true and correct by an independent accountant, showing the gross income of the business to be licensed for the then last three fiscal years of such business, or such shorter period of time that applicant may have been in the business to be licensed, itemized as to each activity of the business, including, without limitation, the gross income from performing massage services." Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As at August 31, 1984 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand Deposits Working Fund Contracts Receivable Loan to Other Funds Inventory: Liquor Wine Beer and Mix Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance Supplies TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS: Land Land Improvements $ 22,766.06 Buildings 729,769.27 Furniture and Fixtures 306,735.14 Leasehold Improvements 3,035.55 $1,062,306.02 Less allowance for Depreciation and Amortization 459.657.88 CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll Due To Other Funds SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets Unappropriated TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 131,354.73 3.800.00 $ 388,919.46 288,036.15 80,679.66 $ 16,918.90 400.00 $ 233,784.60 602.648.04 $ 8363,432.64 1.173.612.15 $ 135,154.73 39,786.69 415,000.00 757,635.27 17,318.90 $1,364,895.59 836,432.64 $2,201,328.23 $ 167,398.53 7,715.27 $ 175,113.80 16,169.64 $ 191,283.44 2,010,044.79 $2,201,328.23 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINq Eight Months Ending August 31, 1984 and August 31, 1983 1984 1983 Increase 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total Decrease* SALES: Liquor $336,463.12 $ 693,467.58 $ 634,282.91 $1,664,213.61 $367,519.50 $ 736,556.79 $ 652,686.46 $1,756,762.75 $ 92,549.14* Wine 207,939.34 388,745.39 333,017.24 929,701.97 212,957.01 399,876.72 338,708.95 951,542.68 21,840.71* Beer 168,063.62 328,304.59 296,637.22 793.005.43 175,230.89 325,962.27 285,691.07.... - 786,884.23 6,121.20 Mix and Miscellaneous 11,012.70 25,546.91 23,359.84 59,919.45 11,431.88 25, 252.43 23,026.47 59,710.78 208.67 $723,478.78 $1,436,064.47 $1,287,297.21 $3;446,840.46 $767,139.28 $1,487,648.21 $1,300,112.95 $3;554,900.44 $108,059.98* Less bottle refunds 17,406.49 43,645.83 40,559.87 101,611.79 19,586.17 41,501.60 43,685.40 104,773.17 3,161.38* N ET SA LES $706,072.69 $1,392,418.64 $1,246,737.34 $3,345,228.67 $747,553.11 $1,446,146.61 $1,256.427.55 $3,450,127.27 $104,898.60* COST OF SALES: Inventory — January 1175,604.42 289,642.25 237,950.02 703,196.69 209,893.84 303,342.64 256, 136.67 - 769,373.15 66,176.46* Purchases _636,376.49 1,114,428.81 1,013,239.73 2,764,045.03 614,421.47 1,1881,346.36 1,036,510.66 2,839,278 49 75,233.46* $811,980.91 $1,404,071.06 $1,251,189.75 $3,467,241.72 $824,315.31 $1,491,689.00 $1,292,647,33...$3, 608, 651.64 ......__ $141,409.92* Inventory Aug. 31 228,766.77 278,703.74 250,164.76 757,635.27 204,856.21 284,060.72 - 240,894.65 729;811.58 27,823.69 $583,214.14 $1,125,367.32 $1,001,024.99 $2,709,606.45 $6199459.10 $1,207,628.28 $1,051,752.68 $2,878,840-06 $169,233.61* GROSS PR O FIT$122,858.55 $ 267,051.32 $ 245,712.35 $ 635,622.22 $128,094.01 $ 238,518.33 $ 204,674.87 $ 571,287.21. $ 64,335.01 OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling 44,765.01 80,997.42 64,655.60 190,418:03 44,104.29 81,391.69 70,462.73' 195,958.71 5,540.68* Overhead 27,872.93 38,608.12 29,218.24 95,699.29 23,530.02 39,144.01 - 28,704.42 - 91,378.45 - 4,320.84 Administrative 52,797.25 67,142.66 56,448.79 176,388.70 47,723.95 64,128.06 50,025.62...... - 161 877,63 - 14 511.07 TOTAL OPE R ATIN x$125,435.19 $ 186,748.20 $ 150,322.63 $ 462,506.02 $115,358.26 $ 184,663.76 $ 149,192 77 $ 449,214 79 $ 13,291 23 EXPENSES NET OPERATING PROFIT $ 2,576.64* $ 80,303.12 $ 95,389.72 $ 173,116.20 $ 12,735.75 $ 53,854.57 $ 55,842.10 $ 122,072.42 $ 51,043.78 OTHER INCOME: Cash Discount 8,960.77 15,030,84 13,463.42 37,455.03 8,731.68 16,994.05 14,716.51 40,442.24 2,987.21* Cash over or under 4.10 188.06* 77.46 106.50* 77.15* 415.94* 128.27. 364.82* 258.32 Income on investments -0- -0- -0- -0- Other 877.92 1.,222.00 684.57 2,784.49 326.36 467.05 360.24 _ 1,153.65 -- 1,630.84 $ 9,842.79 16,064.78 $ 14,225.45 $ 40,133.02 $ 8,980.89 $ 17,045.16 15,205 02 $ 41,231.07 $ 12098.05* NET INCOME $ 7,266.15 �$ 96x367.90$ 1g9�,61,5.17 $ 273.2+9.22 21,776.64 $ 70,899 73 70;687.12 :' S . 163,303 49_ $49,945.73 PERCENT TO NET SALES: - Gross profit 1.7.40% 19.18% 19.71% 19.00% 17.13% 16.49% 16,29% 16.567, Operating expenses 17.77 -- — -- 13.4 -- - -_ - 12.06 13.83 1.5.43 12177 11.87 13.02 Operating profit .37%* 5.77% 7.65% 5.17% 1.70% 3.72% ..............4.42 :, :: :7_ 3.54% Other income 1.39 1.15 1.14 1.20 1.20 1.18 1.21 NET INCOME 1.02% 6.92% 8.79% 6.37% 2.90% 4.90% 5.63% 4.73% LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As At September 30, 1984 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand Deposits $ 150,747.64 Working Fund 3,800.00 Contracts Receivable Loan To Other Funds Inventory: Liquor $ 366,647.29 Wine. 285,610.14 Beer and Wine 65,027.88 Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance $ 15,348.60 Supplies 400.00 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS FIXED ASSETS: Land $ 233,784.60 Land Improvements $ 22,766.06 Buildings 729,769.27 Furniture and Fixtures 306,735.14 Leasehold Improvements 3,035.55 $1,062,306.02 Less: Allowance for Depreciation and Amortization 463,509.68 598,796.34 TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets $ 832,580.94 Unappropriated 1,205,488.74 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 154,547.64 39,786.69 415,000.00 717,285.31 . 15,748.60 1,342,368.24 832,580.94 $2,174,949.18 $ 123,289.72 13,589.78 $ 136,879.50 2,038,069.68 $2,174,949.18 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA Nine Months Ending September 30, 1984 and September 30, 1983 Increase 1984 1983 Decrease* 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale' Grandview Total SALES: Liquor $377,877.77 $ 779,624.69 $ 714,930.82 $1,872,433.28 $ 415,305.74 $ 830,691.28. $ .738,770.83 $1,984,767.85 $112,334.57* Wine 232,970.07 438,008.55 375,047.09 1,046,025.71 % 239,714.70 450,450.86 381,730.90 1,071,896.46 25,870.75* Beer 188,153.33 365,951.56 329,563.63 883,668.52 Operating profit 196,763.59 367,482.12 320,448.62 884,694..33 - 1,025.81* Mix and Miscellaneous 12013.21 28,482.13 26,118.47 66,913.81 1.15 12,823.26 28,345.11 25,999.67 67,168.04 254.23* 1:21 $811,314.38 $1,612,066.93 $1,445,660.01 $3,869,041.32 $ 864,607.29 $1, 676 ,969.37, $1,466,950.02„ $4,008,526.68 .. $139,485.36* Less bottle refunds 19,595.86 48,804.13 45,671.10 114,071.09 22,153.61 47,427.97 49,588.61 119,170.19 5,099.10* N ET SA LES $791,718.52 $1,563,262.80 $1,399,988.91 $3,754,970.23 $ 842,453.68 $1,629,541.40' $1,417,361.41' $3,889,356.49 $134,386.26* COST OF SALES: Inventory —January 1175,604.42 289,642.25 237,950.02 703,196.69 209,893.84 303,342.64 256,136.67 769,373.15 66,176.46* Purchases 691,474.42 1,241,165.10 1,120,998.73 3,053,638.25 686,686.75 1,321,344.89 1,152,325.88 3,160,357.52' 106,719.27* $867,078.84 $1,530,807.35 $1,358,948.75 $3,756,834.94 $ 896,580.59 $1, 624,687.53 $1,408,462.55 - $3,929,730.67 $172,895.73* Inventory Sept. 30 216,729.82 269,846.13 230,709.36 717,285.31 198,388.6 3 263, 334.62 .221,666:27 683,389.52 33,895.79 $650,349.02 $1,260,961.22 $1,128,239.39 $3,039,549.63 $ 698,191.96 $19361,352.91 $1,186,796.28 $3,246,341.15 $206,791.52* GROSS PROF IT$141, 369. 50 $ 302,301.58 $ 271,749.52 $ 715,420.60 $ 144,261.72 $ 268,188.49 $ 230,565.13 $ 643,015.34 $ 72,405.26 OPERATING EXPENSES: Selling 50,638.18 91,204.33 73,271.97 215,114.48 50,441.40 93,249.67 79,972.12 223,663.19 8,548.71* Overhead 30,795.08 42,426.12 32,698.96 105,920.16 26,196.72 - 44,098.93 32,079.75 102,375.40 3,544.76 Administrative 59,222.84 75,029.50 63,266.04 197,518.38 53,258:60 - 71,510.08 56,268.99 181,037.67 16,480.71 TOTAL OPER ATIN ,$140,656.10 $ 208,659.95 $ 169,236.97 $ 518,553.02 $ 129, 896.72 $ ,208,858.68 $ .168,320.86 $ 507,076.26 $ 11,476.76 EXPENSES NET OPER ATIN G $ 713.40 $ 93,641.63 $ 102,512.55 $ 196,867.58 $ 14,365.00 $ 59,329.81' $ 62,244.27. $ 135,939.08 $ 60,928.50 PROFIT OTHER INCOME: Cash Discount 9,718.23 16,873.03 15,044.64 41,635.90 $ 9,891.58 19,249.65 16,851.13 45,992.36 4,356.46* Cash over or under .41* 193.74* 37.47 156.68* 69.53* 536.16* 132.79 472.90* 316.22 Income on investments -0- -0- -0- ..... ..__.. — ... -0- _ ..... Other 937.50 1,259.68 730.13 2,927.31 362.37 521:15 .421.98 1,305.50 - 1,621.81 $ 10,655.32 $ 17,938.97 $ 15,812.24 $ 44,406.53 $ 10 91184.42 $ 19,234.64' $ 17 405.90 $ 46 824.96 $ 2,418.43* N ETINCOM E $ 11,368.72 $ 111,580.60 $ 118,324.79 $ 241,274.11 $ 24,549.42 78, 564.45 .$ 79, 650:17` $_:182,764.W . $ 58,510.07 PERCENT TO NET SALES: Gross profit 17.86% 18.34% 19.41% 19.05% 17.12% 16.46% ...............:16.27 % 16.53% Operating expenses 17.77 13.35 12.09 13.81 15.42 12.82 11.88 13.04` Operating profit .09% 5.99% 7.32% 5.24% 1.70% 3.64% ..............4.39 %............ .....3:49%................ Other income 1.35 1.15 1.13 1.18 1.21 1.18' 1:43 1:21 NET IN' '9E 1.44% 7.14% 8.45% 6.42% 2.91% 1 82% ^i% 4.70% 1984 OF EDINA CHECK ST_R 1C -31 -8 AGE 1 CHECK N0. DATE_ _....., ._ _ _,_..AMOUNT.._ - -.. .._ __.._.... _ .. VENDOR_ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOURT NO,.. p__P.O._._ p MESSAGE y > . -INV._ 276433 10/16/84 97992 PAUSTIS 6 SONS INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 97.92 + rata•* •*r —CKS L 216451 10/16/84 24.55 QUALITY WINE INENTORY — - 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 24.55 afar• - _... _. aa• -CKS 279174 10/16/84 110,000.00 _ 1ST SnUTFDALE BANK .TRANSFER _ _.._- 1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 279174 117/16/84 11090DC000- 1ST SOUTHDALE HANK TRANSFER 750- 50- 1010 - 000 -OC MANUAL .00 + -- a*: -CKS 279430 10/16/84 _ 18,200.38_ .. - -_- -_ STATE TREASURER EMP PERA CONT 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL ' 189200.39 * -- - * ** -CKS � 279523 10/16/84 7,713.82 STATE TREASURER EMP FICA CONT 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL - - -- - ------------- -7,713.8- 2__ *_�.— ____- - - - - -- •• * a • a * ** -CKS � 2795 88 10/16184 231.0 UES7ERN LIFE EM INS PREM 10- 4157- 510 -51 MANUAL 231.00 - _..._ *.* -CKS -. i 223763 10/16/84 10000 CASH FOR BRAEMAR CASH FOR TICKET REG 28 -3800- 000 -00 MANUAL 100.00 a*a *r• * ** —CKS 2b4U67 11 /C6 /E4 860.80 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264067 11 /C6 /E4. _ .__•_ _ 15.75 _- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 876.55 • _ * ** -CKS 284129 11/06/84 1,863.65 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL d 284129 11/06/84 - 2,562.81.. BELLBOY. 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 284129 11/06/84 29093.50 BELLBOY 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 6,520.02 + * * *- CKS 284135 11/06/84 .26 - EAGLE WINE _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 264135 11 /06 /E4 3.17- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 264135 ll/C61F4 5.82- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 284135 11/06/84 11.34- EAGLE_ PINE._ -- _ - _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 284135 11/[6184 158.40 EAGLE MINE _ - -`_ - 50 -4628- 822- P2- •_.._ -__- MANUAL 284135 11/C6184 12.90- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL J CHECK REGISTER 1C -31 -84 PAGE 2 1984 CITY OF EDINA J AMOUNT_ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. N,P.O. 4 MESSAGE CHECK N0. DATE 284135 11/C6/84 291 *22 EAGLE WIN_ 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL :. MANUAL 234135 111°6184 567.01 EAGLE MINE_ 983.66 • J *** -CKS 254138 11/06/64 3.71- E0 Fw ?LLI °S 50- 3710- 822 -82 SC- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL MANUAL 254138 11/C6/84 63.94- - E PHILLI ?S 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 284138 11/76/84 6.10- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL 264138 11 /C6 /E4 37.42- EO PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 104138 11/06/84 6.10- ED PHIL'LTPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2o4138 11/06/84 .0 9 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 20413? 11/C-6/E4 .06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 104138 11/06/84 20010- PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 264138 11/06/84 58.42- r- D PHILLIPS 5C- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL Z6413F. II1161E4 1.16 ED PHILLI ^S 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 26413E 11/06 / 8 4 - - -- 23.76- EO PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1o4139 11/006/84 8.47- _D PHILLIP 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2o413? 11/06/84 .09 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 2o4138 11/06/64 8.92- ED PHILLIPS SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 284138 11/06/84 10.96- ED PHILLI'$ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 264138 11/C6/E4 17.41- ED PHILLIPS 50 -371C- 862 -86 MANUAL 284138 _ _ 11/C6/E4 ...... - .__- __•76- E0.. PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ ___._. MANUAL + 184138 11/06/84 97.17- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL , 26413? 11/C6/E4 3.196.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2841 ?8 11/06/84 _ 4.71 - - ED rHILLIPS �.� 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 204138 11/C6/84 2+920 *97 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 164138 11/06/84 305.'0 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 862 -86 MANUAL 26413E_ - 11 /C6 /84 - -,__ 4 8.58 *55ED PH ILL ? °S .._ _ - -- .._ _ .- .- •- .,_...__... - _...- ..... - -_. _ .50 -4626- 862 -86. MANUAL 184133 11/C6/84 4.55- ED PHILLI S 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 184138 11/C6/84 185.35 ED PHILLI °S 50- 46'e8- 822 -82 MANUAL 26413E 11/ 6184 1,870.95 . . -... - - E0 PHILLI S 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 104138 11/06/84 304.90 E0 PHILLI °S 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 234138 11/06/84 423.60 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL" 264138 11/06/64 .,..__,..___ .__......._._.3 *1.7- ._. ED PHILLIPS _ .. .__...... _ _._._ - ......__..._ -_ -- - -50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264138 11/06/84 58.00- ED PHILLI°�S 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 254138 11/06/84 1.1"68.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 16413E 11/C6/E4 1 *C04.75 _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 104138 11✓06 /84 549.02 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 264138 11/06/E4 39.16 ED PHILLIPS 5C- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL I 164138 11/ ^6/64 _. ...... 445.90 ED PHILLIPS ___...... 50- 4628 - 862 -86 ._._... MANUAL " 284138 11/C6/84 870.35 82.25 ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLI °S INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 284138 264138 10/16/84 1U/16184 E7. PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 164138 10/16/84 _ ,79.75_"_. 122.63 f0 CHILLI'S INVENTORY. 5Q- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 18,013.96 + rrrrra - - -- - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - -- ..._. - _ _...... -- .._......_..__- ..._... .._..- ._..__.... KS 2341 SO 2641 11/06184. -.. __...__...__ - -_ -_. ".4.56 -- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822- 82...... MANUAL MANUAL 164190 11106/84 91.22- GRIGGS COOPER AN C SQ -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 28419U 11/06/84 5.36- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 5+7- 3710 - 842 -8G MANUAL 184190 11/! !6184- __---- ..- ._---- --- -..__- __13.4.1- ._._._._ .__ GRIGGS - _. ANO C - - - -- - ............... .... . ..._.. ..._..__..,- 5`, -3710- 842 -84 _.. - --- -- MANUAL 26 4190 11/C6/E4 96.95- GRIGGS COOPER AND 50- 3710- 862 -A6 MANUAL 1+841,90+ 11/06/84 13.41- GRIGGS C09PER AND C _', a :. 1984 T CF EDINA CHECK IS TER 1C -31 -. PAGE 3 • CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. # MESSAGE •2o41 S0 11/C6/84 13.41- GRIGGS COOPER ANO C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 284190 11/C6/84 122.40 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 204190 11/C6/84 13.41 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -E6 MANUAL 264190 11 /06 /84 268.16 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 2d4190 11/C6/84 228 .CO _ GRIGGS COO °ER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 284190 11/C6/84 4,561.17 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 264190 11/[6/84 4,847.52 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 204190 11/06/84 670.40 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 5C- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 204150 11/[6/84 607.4^ GRIGGS COO °ER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 264190 11/C6/84 6,119.94• GRIGGS CO3 "ER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 204190 11 /C6 /Ei 607.40- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 57 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 264190 11/!)6/84 670.40 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 17,018.28 • + + + + ++ +** CKS 234271 11/06/E4 25.30- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 204271 11/C6/84 6.'0- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 2o4271 11/06/84 18.66- I•ITFRCONTIN °`ITAL PK 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 244271 11/[6184 43.69- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 264271 11/06/84 11.41 - iNTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 254271 11/06/84 2.52- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 204271 11106/E4 _ 68.74- INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2x4271 11/C'6184 4.50 TNTERCONTINENTAL _ PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 2b4211 11/n6/84 19265.19 INTERCONTINENTAL FK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 2o4271 11/16/E4 6.90 IN TER CONTT KEN Tj�L PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 204271 11/06/84 2,052.35 INTER CONT'NENTAL PK 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL io4271 10 /16/8 1 132.13 INTER PKG INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 RANUAL " 2o4271 11/C6/84 14.40 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 264271 11/[6/84 39437.19 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 264271 11/46/E4 933.25 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2b4271 11 /C6 /E4 5.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 204271 11/06/84 570.18 INTERCONTINENTAL °K 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2o4271 11/C6/84 3CO.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2o4271 11/06/84 090 _ .. ?NTE2CONTTNEMTAL PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2o4271 11/C6/84 7.80 INTERCONTINENTAL _ PK 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL io4211 11/[6/84 126.15 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2o4271 11/06/E4 .90 INTERCONT ?NENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL E, 661.72 + • + + + +w + + + -CKS 244285 111[6/84 5.05- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 264285 1110618 4 4.12- JOHNSON NINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 284285 11/C6184 28.93- JOhN;ON WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 284285 11/06/84 13.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 284285 11/[6/84 .09 JOHNSON WINE._ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 2b4285 11/06/84 2.80- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2o4285 11 /C6 /86 9.43- wnPNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 234285 11/C6/84 4.98- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 264285 11/C6/84 252.69 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 234285 11/06/84 2.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 284285 ll/C6/84 _. _.- 206.43 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264285 11/06/84 19446.81 JOHNSON WINE _ _ 5C-4628-842-84_______ - MANUAL 284285 11 /C6 /E4 12. 10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL lQ1 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 1C -31 -84 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. IRV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE 264285 11/06/84 12.00 JOHNSON MINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264285 11/06/E4 4.50 _ JJHNSCiN WINE 5n,- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2d42E5 11 /C6 /P4 4.60- JCHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 264285 11/061E4 698.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 2842F5 11/C6184 5.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 284285 11/06/84 471.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86' MANUAL-: 264285 11/06/84 .60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL. 264285 11/06/84 14 0.24 JOHNSON MINE s 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 264295 11/06/84 3.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 284285 11/06/84 249.27 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - -- - - -- - - -- - -- 3.9431.88_• , .ff f 1 f ••• -CKS 264415 10/16/E4 2935Q.14 MUTUAL BENZFIT EPP PREMIUM 10- 4158 - 510 -51 MANUAL 29359.14 • *6 *4 fff - - - - _ -- ..-- - + +f -CKS 2451 11 /C6 /E4 5.01- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 284451 11/C6184 22.99- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 284451 11106/84 36.28- QUALITY WT NE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 264451 11/06/84 12.16- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 284451 11 /C6 /E4 63.89- QUALITY WINE _ _ _ _ _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 _ - MANUAL. 264451 11106/84 4.63- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 284451 11/C6/84 62.73- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 264451 11/[6184 19149.63 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 264451 11/C618+4 39194.51 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 264451 _ -_- l l/C6184_._- 49136.55____._____OU.4LITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL I• 284451 11/06/84 250.50 _.• QUALITY DINE _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 _ MANUAL'` 284451 11/06/84 608.24 QUALITT WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL , 264451 11/C6/84 - _. 19314.45 QUALITV WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 284451 11/06/84 231.90 QUALITY 6INE 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 119158.19 • •ff rf f • *f -CKS 264700 1U/16/84 _ 275.91 HOME INC H 0 M E CCBG 10- 1139- 000 -OC MANUAL 275.91 + - - 264701 _101161@4 _ - 39551.55DIR ECTOR OF PROPERTY - -- -- - -- -- 2 HALF SPEC -- 10- 4922 - 506 -50 MANUAL 39551.55 • - - ------ ___- _._._-- - - -- -- -- 264702 10/16/E4 _ - 339076.75 - DIR OF PROPERTY _.SPECIAL 10- 4922 - 506 -50 MANUAL 284702 10/16/84 838.30 DIR OF PROPERTY SPECIAL _ 27- 1315- 000 -00 - MANUAL 264702 10/16/E4 392.38 CIR OF PROPERTY SPECIAL 30- 1315 - 000 -00 MANUAL 284702 10/16/84_ _..- 149.63 _ OIR OF PROPERTY SPECIAL MANUAL 264702 10/16/84 64914 DIR OF PROPERTY SPECIAL _ 50- 1315- 000 -00 _ MANUAL 349521.20 + ffffff - fff -CKS 2.86703 1076/84 124.00 ELIZABETH SATTER_LEE- REFUND 10- 3180 - 000_00 MANUAL i l -- -_. - -, 124.00 • _- _- _AMBULANCE _ -- - -- - -- -- - - -- �: I 286704 10/l6/f4. _ - _ _ _ 124.00 _____ _ SAFA M -CORE AMBULANCE REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 MANUAL ,vm* , op co�wx cwccn zm�cn �C�n� xmc o'� ^ C*ccx-mn°-ox7c____- -__-Y��o��-- ---__-_ ITEM DESCRIPTION _ - �) va*°on °°^~cwo ." uon»aa_ 10 v16 1o*_9,�o2~9q AMVcg_�1 L _ sxooLI�E 0~46 12~56 M»mu^L [~ . 299522 1o�1mvo* 278. 37- xmoco ozL cncuxT ------�V~��s*U��------------nAmuxL 99304°*2 .� °*°~cno |'�|~ auq7n6 10 1]6 x?4__-_-__-_-_295 0n°0V_---___�moc�O_-'-_-_- _ -__comoTRUcJnm 1300-000-00 _MxmuxL__ 29500.90 ° i^' ^ 289707 10 /31 ve4'--_'-_-_.4v0 00°00 L- mv*uo�ocm_ ' commrRwoIznN 0-000-00 _M»muxL �vuoo°zn ° . ae»rne -_ xuj(l6,o4*74.00'---_--_ SCOTT _0 FAH/ -_ - -_comr REPAIRS ��@�8� 674°00 '--L- ° � � ' 10x23/8* -__.*51"*3 ` .,~ rcLcpnnms 10~*25*~510~51 nxmuxL avnn,s '| 10v23/E4 oo°as x 7 u 7 29uo15'__--10/23/8 10v23x84 _91°b2__-____-A-T_&_�'___' JELcPHOwE _"__'2O-;4256 10-42 56-510 - 51 MANUAL , 290015 10 12 3 ve4 iUv°ni x r u T . nxmuuL zar°aa ° 5o~oasa~mav~o2MANUAL !^ rcLcpunwc 50~4256~841~84 mxmuxL � 22°00 aaxcwxm PETTY cAuw ' �u�zo�o« 2"76_'____anoc:ARl PETTY cxon _ avoo,u 10v23v84 4.5o ' ^ T m m ' avoo`n 10^23x84 ,^"sp x r u T 290018 ' 10v23/!4--_ .___--- 4°50---_-_-_u ru Ji-___ znnovn �o�aovna �°na x 7 m n ' 43 .76 ° ' ' ' / ' ~ i / , annoso 10x23/8* -__.*51"*3 ` .,~ rcLcpnnms 10~*25*~510~51 nxmuxL EL EpooN c 2_5 220.90 TsLcpemms __ _________mxmuxL Qo-)*zsa MxmoxL .~ 290055 10v23x84 °°°~cmm ' JELcPHOwE _"__'2O-;4256 10-42 56-510 - 51 MANUAL ,�. .. rsLcpmmmc ~a4m~a* _ mxmuxL |^ Cxuh rcLcp�owc an~4zza~rnm~r nxmuuL _ rcLce*mmE 5o~oasa~mav~o2MANUAL !^ rcLcpunwc 50~4256~841~84 mxmuxL � annoso 10x23/8* -__.*51"*3 27~4120~663~e6______ ou^cnxR PEE TTY Cxon 290 c5 5 10v23x8* 220.90 un»cw«m PETTY CASH 290055 10v23x84 50.09 onxcmxm P--TTY cxux 290055__--10/23/n4 cwo*_ __________�ar~*zo0~6mp- 6°o0_______oR*cn4nLf.7rTv PETTY Cxuh Cuox____. xpncos ,nvay/o* 17°60 nn^cnxn PETTY cmso 290055 10123x24 22°00 aaxcwxm PETTY cAuw 290055 - �u�zo�o« 2"76_'____anoc:ARl PETTY cxon _ .nvonnx 10123xo* 51.69 mnAcnup F---TTY rAoo prz°*o ° -' '--- , avuoar 10123/e4 . apnnva Iom6v84 ___*a.o5_ aa°os ° 19v°o0 PETTY cxor 27~4120~663~e6______ PETTY c»um 27~*120~6*4~66 PETTY cuuo 27~4120~666~66 PETTY CASH 27-4 120-667-66 PETTY cxen ----'---'27-4120-672-66-------- PETTY cxun 27~4204~660~66 PETTY cwo*_ __________�ar~*zo0~6mp- 66 PETTY Cxuh _____.__ zr~�aa4~aa4~aa --CAP-ITAL-DI ST INVENTORY 50-4630-822-82 czTn eocn zmnmcTomn - ---- 50-46 30-822- 82 ^ ----��cmm- 7 i , '~ mxmoxL nxmuxL mxmuxL ~ nxmuoL '---n«muxL -| / nxmuwL -__-mumuxL `.. nomuxL ----"i - ;cnS —. nxmwx� ' — -r , ' � ~ nxmoxL' --_-� .- * 1984 CITY OF EO:NA CHECK REGISTER 1C -31 -84 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V --- N00R ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. ,q P.O. # MESSAGE 191 .30 * r *r•ra *** —CKS 2110018 1,x/16/84 676.75 COCA COLA INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL y 676.n5 * rr * *** s,4 rr* -CKS 291129 11/C6/84 296_729.00 BELLBOY 5C- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 290129 11/C6/84 1.834.87 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL " 49473.87 a *r * *• * ** —CKS 290135 11/C6/E4 60.72- - AG L- MIN - 50 -37CO- 822 -82 MANUAL 290135 11/06/84 .13 EAGLE WINE 5C- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290135 11/!'6/84 3.23- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290135 11/06/E4 15.43- EAGLE YIN- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290135 11/C6/84 13.60- EAGL_ WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 290135 11/06/84 6.60- EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 290135 11/C6/E4 161.25 EAGLE WIN= 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 290135 11/06/84 .00 EAGL= WIh= 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 29U135 11/C6/84 771.40 EAGLE WIN= 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290135 11/C6184 619.33 EAGL- WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 9513.03 .. *** -CKS 211013E II/C6/84 - -- 7.39- ED PHILLI °S 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29U138 11/C6/84 2.08- E PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 25+0138 11/C6/84 14.37- ED PHILLIPS 50 -371C- 822 -82 MANUAL 29U138 11/06/84 12.22- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29U138 11/C_6/84 2.40- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290138 11/C6/E4 37.4'0 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290138 11/06/84 6.23- 9:0 PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 291138 11/06/84 2.47- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2901'_8 11 /C6 /E4 2.40 E PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL gl9U138 11/Cf/84 94.20 - FD PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2110138 11/06/E4 20.69- ED PHILLI°S 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290138 11/06/84 _ 61.20- ED PwICLI °S 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 299139 11/06/84 5.18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2YO138 11/06/84 9.46- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 290138 11/C6/E4 4.36- FD PH:LLIDS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290138 11/06/84 22.03- ED PHILLI °S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 2YU138 11/06/84 .05 ED PHILLI °S 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29013E 11106/E4 _ _._ 610.90 ED PHILLI =S 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 190138 11/06/84 49710.19 ED PHILLI °S 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 2110138 11/06/E4 39059.84 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 290138 11/06/84 719.50 ED FHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 290139 11/06/84 369.50 ED PHTLLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 190138 11/06/84 103.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ` 290138 11/C6/E4 1.034.25_ E PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290138 11/[6/84 1.25 ED PHILLI °S 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290138 11/ ^6/84 311.25 E0 FHILLI °S 5C- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL " t t. 290271 1984 f OF EDIRA 11/C6/8L CHECK ISTER 290271 _ 1C -31 -: 'AGE 71 290271 CHECK NO..OATE . AROUNT VENDOR„ __. 11/06/84 __._..IT,EM DESCRIPTION— AV. pP.O.tt MESSAGE ` 11/C6/84 290271 11/06/F.4 290271 11/C6/F4 290271 ,__-- __A000,U.NT_N0. -,I 11/C6/84 290271 290138 11/C6/84 121.05 ED PHILLIPS 11/06/84 -_- 290211 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL -` 11/06/84 290138 11/06/84 119.80 _ ED PHILLIPS 290271 11/C6/F4 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290271 290138 11/06/84 121.05- ED PNILLI °S MANUAL .57 - 50- 4628- 842 -84 - MANUAL - - -- 50 -3710- 862- 86---- ^ 290138 11/06/84 19869.94 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL PK _. 290138 11 /C6 /F4 _- _259.20ED PHILLIPS PK _ ._. 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL I _ INTERCONTINENTAL 290138 11/06/84 1.101.30 ED PHILLIPS -__ INTERCONTINENTAL _PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 69159.34 290138 11/06/84 2.33- ED PHILLIPS 198098 INTERCONTINENTAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL - 290138 11/['6/84 213.23 _ ED PHILLIPS MANUAL 2,497.10 50- 4628 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL - 50- 4626- 842 -84 29U138 11 /C6 /F4 492.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL PK _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 149678.96 INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ _ -- 50 -4626- 862 -86 ._. - -- MANUAL !7 I INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL ••. -CKS 29J190 11106/F4 _ .45 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290190 11/C6/84 69.63- GRIGGS CO3PER AND _ C _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL a 29J190 11/006/84 21.99- GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290190 11/C61P4 1.10.43- ._GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 0 290190 11/06/84 12.29- GRIGGS COOPER AND C - 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 4 290190 11/06/84 95.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 290190 11/06/84 _ 9.37 - -_ .,_ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL v 290190 11/76/91 22.34- CRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 290190 11/06184 1jr99.50 GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 29019C__. 11 /C6/84 - -__ _, 38481.25__ ,__GRIGGS - COOPER AND C _ _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL a 290190 11 /C6 /F4 5,521.43 GRIGGS CCOPER AND C _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 ^ - ^_- MANUAL 290190 11 /C6 /P4 614.58 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL - 290190 11 /C6 1F4 4,759.97 _,GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 290150 11/06/84 468.30 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 15.604.23 290271 , -INTERCONTINENTAL 290271 11/C6/8L 290271 11/06/84 290271 _ _ . 11/06/84 _ 290271 11/06/F4 29C271 11/06/84 290271 11/06/84 29U271 11/C6/84 290271 11/C6/84 290271 11/06/F.4 290271 11/C6/F4 290271 11/06/84 290271 11/C6/84 290271 11/06/84 290271 11/06184 290271 .._... 11/06/84 -_- 290211 11/06/84 290271 11/06/84 290271 11/C6184 . 290271 11 /C6 /F4 290271 11/C6/F4 290271 -_. ._ - 11 /06/84 -,- 290271 11/06/84 290271 I I/C6/84 *•i -CKS,i 47.73- -- . , -INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 34.85- INTERCONTINENTAL PK - _ 50 -3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 89.29- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 43.49- _ -I NMI CONT MEN TAL PK 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 49.94- IN ?ERCONTINENTAL PK _ _ �- 50-3710-842-84-------'-------- MANUAL-' 1.61- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 1.23.18 - TNTERCONTTNENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 3.97- INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ _ 50- 3710 - 842 -P4 MANUAL 32.29- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 25.1 5 - IN TER CONTI NENTAL PK _.. - - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL .57 INTERCONTINENTAL PK - - -- 50 -3710- 862- 86---- ^ - - - - -- MANUAL 9.90 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL .00 ..- __ INTERCONTINENTAL PK _. 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL v 2.174.64 INTERCONTINENTAL PK - -- - - -50- _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 - MANUAL 990.45 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 3.00- --_ -__ INTERCONTINENTAL _PK 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 69159.34 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 - MANUAL 198098 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL - __._._ 13.50_ . -,_. INTERCONTINJENTAL PK _.•_ _ ._ _ 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 2,497.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK - 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 22.20 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ___,_ - -. -._ ..30__._- __INTERCONTTNENTAL PK _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL .00 INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ _ -- 50 -4626- 862 -86 ._. - -- MANUAL !7 19614.97 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 1984 CITY OF ECINA CHECK NO. DATE 290271 11/ ^6/14 290271 11/C6/84 290271 11/6/94 250271 11/C6184 290271 11/ ^6/E4 290271 11 /C6 /84 • +airr 290285 11/C6/84 290285 11/06/84 25+0285 11 /06/84 290 2 85 1 1 / C6 18 1 2/02A5 11/ ^6/84 2902E5 11/C6/E4 2Y0285 11 /76/84 2y02P5 11/C6/E4 2902E5 11/C6/84 2902F5 11/[6/84 290 285 11 /06/84 2Y0225 11/06/84 290285 11/6/84 2902E5 11/C61E4 290285 11/06/84 290285 11/06/84 2yu, 285 11/:6/84 2902E5 11/C6/84 2902p5 11/:6/81 290285 II/C6/84 ritiir CHECK 290302 10/16/84 VEND01 ITEM DESCRIPTION 290311 10/16/84 riiiar 28.87- 290366 10/16/84 2YU37P, 10/16/84 2,109.69 KUETHER DIST INVENTORY 2,109.69 * 2,677.35 EAST SIDE 2,677.35 104.25 104.25 + 2,426.30 2,426.30 + i #i• #+ 290396 10/16/84 6C. .25 FN BAR SUPPLY MARK V11 NW R7-LL INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY TELEPHONE 1C -31 -84 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4626- 862 -86 CHECK REGIST =R AMOUNT VEND01 ITEM DESCRIPTION 7.50 INTERCONT!NENTAL PK 28.87- INTr-RCON71NEMTAL PK 80.50 TNTE3CONTINEMTAL PK .60 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 19257.65 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 8.10 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 149558.93 + MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 3.95- JOHNSON WINE MANUAL .96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 16.01- JOHNSON WINE MANUAL 3.49- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 8.25- JOHNSON MINE 4.12- JOFNSGN W ?NE 12.58- JOHNSON WINE 48.04 JOHNSON WINE 3.00 JOHNSON WINE 197.53 JOHNSON PINE 412.80 JOHNSON WINE 80 1..78 JOHNSON WINE 9.00 JOHNSON WINE 174.70 JOHNSON WINE 14.40 JOHNSON WINE 3.00 JOHNSON WINE 4.50 JOHNSON WINE 629.10 JOHNSON WINE 206.40 401 -NSON WINE 11.10 JOHNSON WINE 2,464.99 2,109.69 KUETHER DIST INVENTORY 2,109.69 * 2,677.35 EAST SIDE 2,677.35 104.25 104.25 + 2,426.30 2,426.30 + i #i• #+ 290396 10/16/84 6C. .25 FN BAR SUPPLY MARK V11 NW R7-LL INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY TELEPHONE 1C -31 -84 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3 710- 86 2- 86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -8E MANUAL 50 -3 710- 86 2- 86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 46228- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -8E MANUAL 57- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL +* *-CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4632- 822 -fit MANUAL * **-CKS 50 -4630- 822 -82 MANUAL * * * -CK3 10- 4226 - 160 -16 MANUAL 0 1984 Y OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 10 -31 -i AGE 9 CHECK.NO.__DATE_ ____. A90UNT. VEND.OR,_ .ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO.._INV. N P.O. 0 MESSASE _ 2YO396 1U/16/E4 2,874.09 NW BELL TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL ". 290396 _1U/16/84 .- 416.58. NW BELL TELEPHONE 20- 4256- 622 -E2 MANUAL ` 290396 10/16/84 253.66 NW BELL TELEPHONE 20- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 29035E 10/161p4 64.24 NW BELL TELEPHONE 20- 4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 290 396- _ - _ -_ 10/16/84 176.39_ -.NW BELL TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 611 -61 MANUAL 290396 10/16/84 47.65 NW BELL - -- — TELEPHONE _ _ _ 26- 4256- 689 -68 — _ MANUAL 290396 10/16/84 377.29 AW BELL TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 661 -66 MANUAL 290396 10116/84 -__ ,.. _. -- _.330.58 ._- __- NW BELL _ TELEPHONE 28- 4256- 708 -70 MANUAL 290396 1U/16184 4797? NW BELL TELEPHONE 29- 4256- 721 -72 MANUAL 290396 10/16184 210930 NW BELL TELEPHONE 30- 4256- 782 -78 MANUAL 290396 - _ -_ 10/16184._ _95.11 NW BELL._. - -. _ ,. _ TELEPHONE 40- 4256- 801 -80 MANUAL 2YU390 Iu/16/84 148.21 NW BELL _ _ TELEPHONE _ - - _ _ -��50- 4256 - 821 -82 - - — MANUAL J 290396 290396 10/16/84 10/16/84 _ 178.24 _ _ 128.32 - -_ -- NW BELL _ NW BELL _ TELEPHONE TELEPHONE - -- 50 -4256- - l - - -- 50 -4256 862 -86 �jfg MANUAL MANUAL ` 5,408.68 f rrfffr .. . 290433 11/06/84 199.75 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ` 290433 11/06/84 4925 _ 'FAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL•_ ` 2Y0433 11/06/E4 10.50 FAUSTIS 9 SONS _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL' 290433 11/C6/84 820.08 FAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290433 11/ ^6/84__ —_ - -� _ , 179.04 ._ QAUSTIS & SONS - -- - -- - -^ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 290433 l l/C6/84 46.92 PAUSTIS & SONS - - — - - -50 -4628- 862 -86 ------MANUAL;;, 290433 11/06/84 4.25 PAUSTIS & SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ++ffrr S 290451 11/06/84 .10 QUALITY WINE - - —l50 -3710- 822 -82 -- ' - _ l -'- MANUAL 290451 11/06/84 3.49- QUALITY W ?NE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL• 290451 11/r.6/84 _. _ 5.21 - - -._ _-QUALITY WINE _. _ _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 2Y0451 11/06/84 7.48 QUALITY WINE _ _ - _. _. . _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL' 290451 ll/C6/84 19.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290451 _ _ 11/06/84 .23 QUALITY WINE -_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 290451 11/06/84 95.95- QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 290451 11/C6/84 13.20- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 290451 11106/84 _ __- 10.98 -_ ___ __QUALITY WINE _ __- _ _ _ _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL! 290451 11/C6/84 27.06- QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL' 290451 11/C6/84 6.34- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL, 2YD451 _. _ 11/ C6 /844797.53- QUALITY WINE _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL r 290451 11/06/84 19353.20 QUALITY WINE - -�— _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL 290451 ll/C6184 260.91 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 290451 11/06/84 _ - _. 174.75__ -... QUALITY WINE _- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 290451 ll/C6/84 5.02- QUALITY WINE - _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 - MANUAL 290451 11/06/84 660.11 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL !, 290451 11/18/84__- __9589 87__ _- .GUALITY_WINE___ . 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL !. <i 290451 11,/C6184 11.43- QUALITY WINE - ___._ _ - -50- 50 -4628- 842 -84 - MANUAL 290451 11/06/84 374.07- GUALITV WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 290451 11/C6/84 _... 317.34 _ QUALITY WINE ..- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 290451 11/C6/84 549.24 QUALITY 4INE --50- _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 8007.74 + _999.9._,_.__ � ff + +f+ .. ____- _--- .�— .�.�.,— - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- ---- - -- - - -- - --- -- __------- - - ----- --- --- -- - - - --- - _ . _�' � +•• -CKS I A; 290460_ -.. __ 10/1.6/84. 99,60 ____ROYAL - CROWN____ ___ _INVENTORY___ -__ 50- 4632 - 822 -82 _ _- MANUAL ` 1984 CITY OF ECINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 1C -31 -84 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50-4630-862-86 INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290- 510 -51 99.60 50 -4630- 822 -82 f f f f f# 290463 10/16/24 1,767.05 REX DIST 290463 10J16IP_4 2,811.65 REX DIST t STATE 4.578. ?0 + TAX •frtr• 290467 10/16124 184.00 ROYAL BEV 290467 1U/16/84 198.00 POYAL BEV 28- 3357- 000 -00 STATE 382.00 + TAX •fti+r STATE SALES TAX 290709 10/16/84 2,00C.00 U S P MAST ---R 50- 3357 - 001 -00 29CDO.00 + 290710 10/16/24 159.45 ULYER METRO DIST 290f1C 10/16/24 108.50 LLMER METRO DIST 266.95 + 29u111 10/16/84 206.00 DAY DIST ?_06.00 290712 10/16/E4 60.30 TRI STATE BEV 60.30 + 25273E 10/23/84 606.0-0 SDEEDY PRINT 606.90 + 1 f f k t# 293032 10/23/84 184.00 BISHOP TRAVEL • f f f f f 293L91 1J/23/84 6,000.00 CITY OF EDINA 293091 l0123/E4 6,111.00- CITY OF EDINA 293U91 10/23/E4 6,111.00 CITY OF EDINA 6,000.00 #rt trr 293095 10/23/E4 100.36 COMM OF REVENUE 293095 10/23/E4 48.97 _ COPP OF REVENUE 293095 10/23/E4 5,0- 87.72 COMM CF REVENUE 293095 10/23/84 63.62 COMM OF REVENUE 293095 10/23/84 187.87 _ COMM OF R7- VENU- 293095 10/23/84 29623.17 COMM OF REVENUE 293795 10/23/E4 7,234.90 COMM OF REVENUE 1C -31 -84 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. # MESSAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50-4630-862-86 INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 POSTAGE DUE 10- 4290- 510 -51 INVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 - 86 INVENTORY 50-4630-862-8f" INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 UNAPP SURPLUS 66- 2490 - 000 -CO CONFERENCE 20- 4202- 60C -60 TRANSFER 10- 1139 - 000 -OC CCRRECTION 10- 1139 - 000 -OC TRANSFER 10 -1139- 000 -OC STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 STATE SALES TAX 23- 3357- 000 -CC STATE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -CO STATE SAL =S TAX 28- 3357- 000 -00 STATE SALES TAX 29 -3357- 000 -JD STATE SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -CO STATE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 1984 r r OF cnzwu c cnccn I Inrcn I I C-31 -t xsc I I � . cwccx m mc°-DATE o ouNJvcm�o9 _ _ - _ _----- -�Tcw-Ac��J�A0___'--_'��gP�I_�l�-gu��-�_��w�os«s��- _ _ a a93u95 1 1ox23184 1 14,*29°12 c comm or ncxswoc o oTxrc o o»cEn TAX s sU~oosn~ooc~Vo n nxmooL� . .opoo*o 1 10x23v84 1 129e02°61 - ' 'noMn.op ocxcmuc . . orxrc o oxLsn TAX _ s so-o3 ��qyc�o � �mvux�r{ '^ } . 4296n1.24 ° � ---- ----' -.� | ' ' ayov7* 1 10ve3x84 1 1409000°00~ 1 1ST ouureo^cF o oxmw 7 7nmopse 5 50~1010~000~00 M MANUAL.'. , znnxr^- - - vu/z3vo4__--__-_v*o,a9o°on . .-'_.2s7_unurmoxLc _ _ oxmn r rRmspcK 5 5p~1n1n~ 000-00__ n nmmuxL /. . 293198 vovaove* s,aaz°v* mnoup mc^LrH cnp moop pncMuzw 10-4156-510- 51 ----------- - |. _ °°*-cwm'_-!.� wAmumL ` °°°~cmm 293354 101231e4 ��-2250*------PImmcox§c6--' ' -- - GAS -- ------''---'10-4254-446 4*'--'=---- --'MxmoxL'� _ 293354 10v2318* 195.*3 pznmcmmocn wwn 10~4254~520~52 MANUAL",; ` 293354 1o/zo/n4 ___ �a.rz nzmmcn�mcn �xo �o~^as* ~ s*o~n� m�mux�^ - --_ _ ---- ' -- ^ 293354 lu^zufo^ *.vz mzmmcswuco axs ------- 20~425*-629~62---- --'--nxmuxL _ 29335* 10v23/84 762.26 nIwwcsAoco sxo 20~425*~**6~64 nxmu»L'� . ^ 293354 _ 19123v84 29°41 MzmwcnxocO s^o 23~4254~611~61 nxmuxL �| 293354 :0/23/84 49271°77 ---- PImmcsnoco---- ------- GAS ------ 26~*254~689-68 -- -'---------nxmuxL' -� _ 293354 vovaovu* 106930 nImmcsSoco sxu 27~4254~661~6e nxmuxL' apsoo* 10123/�4 - 2 9.59 wI NNE s«aco ouo av~4 254~66 2~66 nxmuwL ' aysyn* 10 /2 3 ve* 1 ,324°36 wImmEnAoc� oxs - -28~*2 54~70 8~70 -- -' - -' MxwuxL ' _ . Z93354 10/23/81 *83°36 nzxmcnxoco uxo 30~42 54~78 1~78 mxmuxL`' . -.293354----.- 10/23ve* 5°n�___��___MImmcGnscV__ GAS _,______40�4zno~op1~un nxwuxL' avoon� �o�asxm� *�°�v mzwmcs�aco mxo � oo~��*�a��~m* -------------�xmux� --| ' aesoo« 10x23/84 za°ro mzmmcnxocn GAS 50~425*~861~86 nxmoxL ` ^ 293*30 111v23x84 20,719°91 ' 209719.91 ° ' 293523 -- .-_10/21v8* ^ __--___�4o9~52'- vv«o9.sa ° ., °°°-cuo -PERA------- '-----'- -- EMPLOYERS Pcex'Cnmr----vo~4145-9vo-51---------'--nxmuxu- ..` °°^~cxm _ _s.pp_rkL_S ECU mIrY- EMPLOYERS FICA MAmU«L�� ' 296198 10/23x8* 12,089.*1 p*P cMp Mowp PREMIUM 10~4156~510~5 1 .� 296765 10/23/84 1 "579091) pns7mnurc1 pour^sc mcuoLcfrcn _- ---,d_42n0-oOo-_5U--- 19579.90 ^ 2*7067- __xxvumxo*��cxp�4��zTvozumI_- ` ^ ` °°°~cwa '---' -_ � nxmwxL / °°°~cmo' .� axmwoL .` °^^~Cnm � 293*30 111v23x84 20,719°91 ' 209719.91 ° ' 293523 -- .-_10/21v8* ^ __--___�4o9~52'- vv«o9.sa ° ., °°°-cuo -PERA------- '-----'- -- EMPLOYERS Pcex'Cnmr----vo~4145-9vo-51---------'--nxmuxu- ..` °°^~cxm _ _s.pp_rkL_S ECU mIrY- EMPLOYERS FICA MAmU«L�� ' 296198 10/23x8* 12,089.*1 p*P cMp Mowp PREMIUM 10~4156~510~5 1 .� 296765 10/23/84 1 "579091) pns7mnurc1 pour^sc mcuoLcfrcn _- ---,d_42n0-oOo-_5U--- 19579.90 ^ 2*7067- __xxvumxo*��cxp�4��zTvozumI_- ` ^ ` °°°~cwa '---' -_ � nxmwxL / °°°~cmo' .� axmwoL .` °^^~Cnm � 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NC. DATE 297 C67 11/06/84 297067 11/06/84 297067 11 /C6 /E4 :fffff 297129 Fy, 297129 f t f f f f CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT_ _ VENDCR ITEM DESCRIPTION 180.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 7.65 CAPITAL CITY LISTR1 368.47 CAPITAL CITY OISTRT 55 -3.87 + 11 /06/84 29228.45 BELLBOY 11/06/84 2.947.05 B =LLBOY 5.175.59 + 1C -31 -84 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P-0. 0 M_SSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL' 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _. .... * ** -CKS s"i 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 297135 11/CS/84 3.77- EAGLE VIN' 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 297135 11/06/84 15.60- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 297135 11/C6184 . ^? EAGLE WIN= 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 297135 11/16/84 5.36 - _ EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 297135 11/C6/84 24.27- c _AGLE WIN' 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 297135 11/[6/84 189.54 E.AGL_ PINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 297135 11/06/84 779.88 EAGLE WIN_ 5-3-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 297135 11/[6184 4.28- EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 297135 11/06/84 268.05 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 297135 11/06/84 1.213.30 EAGLE MINE _. -. 50 4628 -8 2 -86 - 6 Mp MANUAL 2.396 .5 7 + ffffff * ++ -CKS 297138 11 /C6 /84 7. 7,7- ED PHILLIPS .. 50 -371C- 822 -82 MANUAL 297139 11/06/P4 4.31 -- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 297138 11/06/84 13.18- �D PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 29713F 11/06/84 70.94 - ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 - MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 8.64- ED FHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 2y 713? 11/06/84 59.68- TO PHILLIPS 5C- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 297138 11/06/81 4.67- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 20.78- - _ ED PH - - 50 -3710 842 84 MANUAL ' 297138 11/06/84 .22 c _0 PHILLIPS _ 5C -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 2'/7133 11/06/84 .C6 EO PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11 /C6 /E4 6.54- TO PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11/C6/84 162.74- ED FHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86'- MANUAL 297138 11/06184 F. 52- EO PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84.- .---- ...---- _._._._._...8.,'4- D PHILLIPIS - - - 50 3710 862 86 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 6.44- ED PHILLIPS _ � 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 29713E 11/C6IE4 3.547.11 O EO PHILL1 S 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 297138 - 11/06/84 2.984.18 ED PIILLI °S 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 291138 11/C6/84 8.137.17 ED PHILLI °S _ 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 426.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11/C6/E4 ...... _ -_. ,.659.05. FD PHILLIPS SD -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1 ]1/06/84 215.50 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 29713E 11/C6/84 353.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 297138 11/16/F4 1.039.00 „_ -T0 PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 - MANUAL 297138 11/6/84 233.52 ED PwILLLIPS _ -.. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 432.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 29.7138- - ____.11 /CE /E4 322.10 ED FHI LLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 297138 11/06/84 11.09- ED PHiLLImS 50- 4628- 862 -86 - - - MANUAL 297138 11/C6/84 2.92- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1984 'Y OF EDINA CHECI ;ISTER CHECK NC.. DATE ... _..... -.- _.AMOUNT...._ VENDOR 297138 11/06/84 327.15 ED PNILLI'>S 297138 11 /[6 /E4 4C1.77 ..ED PHILLIOS 189682.52 + ..... + 2971 SO 11/C6/84 2.56 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C 297190 11/06/A4 93.68- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 2971 SC 11/C6/84 7.51- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 291190 11/06/84 4.94- GRIGGS CO3PER AND C 297190 11/C6/E4 . _._..__ _..__....._._ 5.CO- _..- .. GRIGGS COOPER AND C 291190 11/06/84 117.57- GRIGGS CO3PER AND C 297190 11/C6/E4 16.48- GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 29719C 11/06/84 - 138.43- GRIGGS COOPER ANC C 2971 SO 11/06/E4 13.63- GRIGGS CCOPER .4 ND C 2971 90 11 /C6 /84 128.06 GR IGGS COOPER AND C :.297190 11/C'6/84 _- _____4,6P3.85. GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 297190 11/06184 375.26 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 297190 11/06/84 247.2D GRIGGS COOC'ER AND C 297150 11/[6/84 5,878.29 _ _GRIGGS COOPER AND C 297190 11/06/84 249.98 GRIGGS C00PER AND C 297150 11/06/84 824.00 Gr1IGGS COOPER AND C 29719C. 11/06/84„_- 6.81.50__.,-- --.. "---- _ GRIGGS .,CCIPER AND C 2971 SO 11/F,6/E4 6,921.67 GRIGGS COJFER AND C 19,59C.01 297271 ... 11/06/84 _.._._........ __._ -- ._.,_..__.1.13._- -....,. _.. .. INTERCONTTNENTAL PK 297271 11/06/84 38.58 -- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/£4 14.18- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/84 - ,..16.54 - -, INTERCONTINENTAL PK 291271 11/06/E4 123.P1- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/E4 14.95- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/C6/E412.76 -., ._, -._ ._,INTERCONTINENTAL PK 291271 11/06/84 9.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11 /C6 /E4 56.95- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/84 _ ,1,929.20. .__. INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/84 69190.88 IN TER C ONT T N__ NT A L FK 297271 11/C6/84 709.20 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271. _..1 1/06/84 3.00,..._- -..._.____.. IN TERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/[6184 33.90 INTERCONIINENTAL PK 297211 11/[6/84 5,747.72 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/84 2.70..- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/06/81 23.70 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 297271 11/[61E4 63?. 21R ZNTERCONTTNENTAL PK 297271 .- . -- 11/ C6/ 84_.,_....-__._9.00.... - -_ -- ._....__INTER CON TINENTAL PK + 297271 11/OE/84 827.32 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 15,846.96 + 2972£5_._..._ 11/ C6/ 84_ --- ---- 9. ^9- .____.._..,. JOHNS ON_WINE.. 2972E5 ll/C6184 14.01- JOHNSON WINE 297285 11/C6/84 5.58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 1C -31- PAGE 13 ITEM ,DESCRIPT- ION_,.,_„_,_ ., _ACCOUNT NO..-MY. A P.O. q MESSAGE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL::: 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 + ++ -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 51 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MA ?DUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 - MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL . 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 -- MANUAL _ ...- C K S 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL' 50- 3710- 822 -82 _.- _..... -_ MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL __....._... __._ _..,_ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 - - MANUAL 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL` 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 'r 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL.. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842- 84._ -.__ MANUAL :. + +.- CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL' 50- 3710- 822 -82 "_._____._.._..._. _. - MANUAL .; 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 1994 CITY CF EDINA ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE CHECK REGT *STAR CHECK -KO- DATE AMOUNT_ VENDCO 297285 11 /C6 /E4 3.23- JOHNSON WINE 291285 11/06/84 22.00- J ^H^JSON WINE 2Y7285 11 /06 /8c 3.00 JOHNSON WINE 2972F5 11/[6184 700.90 JOHNSON WINE 2Y7285 11/n6/8i _ _- _ 4.30_ JOHNSON WINE 2972P5 11/^6/E4 19100.40 JOHNSON W`_NE 2Y7285 11/C6/84 454.64 JOHNSON WINE 297295 11/06/84 7.80 JOHNSON WINE � 2Y72E5 297285 11/C6/E4 11/06/84 2.7.0 279.29 JOHNSCP JOHNSON W_ PE WINE M' 297285 I1/C61E4 161.60 _ JOHNSON W *_NE 2Y7285 11/06/84 1.50 JOHNSON WINE WINE 297451 29662.72 • 6.R5- QUALITY 297435 11/06/84 7.68- PRIOR WINE CO 297435 11/06/ ?4 384.24 PRIOR WINE CO 376 .56 • 297451 1C -31 -84 PAGE 14 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL S0-4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL CUALITY f.. -CKS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 297451 11'/06/84,._ ._., -.,. _ 52.03- MANUAL 41 NE 297451 11/[6194 .57 CUALITY W! NE 297451 11/C6/84 .57 QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 .57- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 4.35- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/94 55.10- CUALITY WIN= 297451 - - 11/06/84_ --- ---- _.- ___ -____ .291 _ __ QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 .29 CUALITY _ WINE 297451 111/06184 26.36- QUALITY WINE 297451 11./C6/84_ 19.70- 50- 4626- 842 -84 WINE 297451 11 /C6 /84 1.72- CUALITY 4INE 297451 11106/E4 .29- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 ,.. 10.60- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 6.R5- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/C6/84 .54- QUALITY WINE 297451 _ 11/C6/ 84 42.10 -_ QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 29.26- GUALITY _ WINE 297451 11/06/84 28.68 QUALITY WINE 297451 11%06/84 . CUALITY 6INE- 297451 11/06/E4 291 .65-i- QUALITY WINE 297451 11/C6184 14.38 GUALITY WINE 297451 11 /06/. ?4 _ _ 2,755.1 7 QUALITY WI NE 297451 11/06/84 14.67- CUALITY WINE 297451 11/^6/E4 14.33- G'JALITY WINE ..297451 . -_ _ - 11/C6/E4, ____--- -- -- ---_ -- 201.05.19 _- - - - - -- QUALITY WIN -._. 297451 11/06184 217.54 QUALITY _. WINEE 297451 11/C6/84 E6.25 QUALITY WINE 297451 11/C6/84 _ -.- 985.25 QU =LITY WINE 297451 11/C6/E4 19318.00 QUALITY WINE j 297451 11/06184 530.02 QUALITY DINE 29745111106/84- .---- ---- -_ - - -- 342.72QUALITY WINE 297451 11/06/84 27.25 QUALITY. WINE 109706.67 + In fff -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL •• 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84. MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 - MANUAL -_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822- 82' °_._.,._.....,.. ..._.._.. MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 5C- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628- -862--86--'-' MANUAL 1987 Y OF EDINA CHECI SISTER 1C -31- PAGE 15 •.. CHECK_- NO._.DATE___ _r_,AM.OUNL VENDOZ_._____.___.._._..• _ ITEM I_N4. P.O., #.MESSAGE___ 1 .OESCRIPTION___-.�,ACCOUNT_N0. -p -i, !r! -CKS I +' 29754(1 11/06/84 5.75- TWIN CITY WIPJF 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL .___.297540 __11/Q6/84- .__ - 287.70 ,.- ,__ -_._ -TWIN. CITY • WINE - -___ _. _.. 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 297540 11/C61E4 3.OD TWIN CITY WINE - _ _ _ 50-4628-842-84 _ _ _ MANUAL _ 284.95 r.i►ri - ! *! -CKS 30.00-,_- __...._CLT11- OF_EDI- NA _ SCH,CL-ARSHIPT 4504 - 627- 62 MANUAL ^20- -�_- -_ - I. . itiirr - - - - - -- - --- - - - - - -- -. - �1 !!! -CKS 304067 11/C6184 705 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _. .304U67 11/06/84_349.67 CAPITAL CITY OISTR? 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ y 304067 11/06/84 1.51) CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 304067 11/Q6/84 29.98 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .304067... 10/31/14 16.50 _ CAPITAL. CITY _ INVENTORY, _________._._50- 4630 - 862 -86 MANUAL 404.80 - _ ! *! -CKS '" , 304091 10/31/84 59000.00 CITY OF EDINA TRANSFER 10- 1139 - 000 -00 MANUAL _ .. ..._._.___- .. -.__ °_ 5000.0.0__.•_____._._.__ -_.__ rilrrr *rr -CKS 304135 11/06/84 31.74- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 �, - MANUAL 3(14135 11/06/84 67.77- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL + . .304135_ .11/[6/84 _ _ __...__ .__. .05 - _..__.EAGLE WINE - . _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304135 11/06/84 75.31- EAGLE WINE - - - -- - - -50- 3710- 862 -86 -_ MANUAL 304135 11/06/84 1 5 '87.00 EACLE MINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ..3C4135 _ __ -_ -11/ 06/84 -1 -_3- 9388. -32_- __.EAGLE_ VINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 304135 11 /C6 /84 2.55- EAGLE WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 304135 11 /C61?4 39765.70 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 862-86 MANUAL r 304135 10/31/84 - .188.35_ _ .___ -- EAGLE_ WINE__, _ _ -._ _ . INVENTORY - -_ 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 8,752005 i _ _ - -- -- - - - - - -- -- iirlir -- **f -CKS 304138 11106/8A 6.60- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3700- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 __.____1i'/06/84 -- - -- - - 40.69 - -- - -._ E0. PHILLIPS - ._. _. -- - 50- 3710 - 822- 82-- MANUAL 304138 11106/84 .93- ED PHILLIPS -- - - -- - 50 -3710- 842 -84 - - - -_ . -- - - MANUAL 304138 11/06/84 23.15- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _..- 3U4138_ 11/06/84 9.81- EEL PHILLIPS,,_ _ _ - - 50- 3710 - 842 -84_ MANUAL 304138 11/06/84 32.35- ED FNILLIPS - 50 -3710- 862 -86 -XIi -'�- MANUAL 3U4138 11/[6/84 1.86- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL .304138 _. _ 11/06/84___ _ .___..._ 5.33- _- ED PHILLIPS _. _. _. ,- . _ -_ .. _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 30.4138 11/06/84 .03 ED PHILLIPS -_ 50 -3710- 862 -86 - _ MANUAL.. 304138 11/C6/84 .15 ED FHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ _- .304138 - ..__.._11/[6/84, 2.�Q34.70 __ED_PHILLIPS.___ -_- - �.-- _ - - - 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL I 304138 11/06/84 490.30 ED PHILLIPS - -- 50- - 4628 - 842 -84 , -�- MANUAL - 1 304138 11JC6/84 19157.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL l 1984 CITY OF EDINA CH =CK REGISTER 1C -31 -84 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOP ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE 304138 11/C6/84 46.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304138 11/06/84 no . _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 11 /C6/24 1.50- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 11/C6184 7.35- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 _ 11/C6/84 ._ _ 266.50 _ _ ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 30413E 11/C6/84 19617.35 ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 11/06/84 93920 ED P14ILLTPS 59- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304138 1U/31/84 57.25 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY s 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL SU4138 10/31/84 68970 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY _ 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 304138 10/31/84 11.45 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 9 *4 *9 + ++ -CKS 1* (*J 0* 11/06/84 32.99- GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304150 111061E4 1,649.63 GRIGGS CCOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL - - -- 19616.64 r ..r.r. * ** -CKS 304251 10/31/84 30,000.60 EDINA HRA DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL 3090[0.00 + - - -- - - -.. - - — - + +r -CKS 304271 11/06/84 3.0$- INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 3C4Z71 11/061E4 6.23- INTERCONT ?NENTAL PK 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304271 11/96/84 154.42 INTERCONTINENTAL PK ,. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .304271_ 11/06/84 _2.10•.._ -- INTERCONTINENTAL PK _ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304271 11/06/84 2.70 INTE,3CONTINENTAL _ PK - , -- - - �- 50-4628-862-8&'-- _ -- MANUAL . 3U4271 11/[6/84 311.50 INTERCONTINENTAL PK 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 461.41 .rr r.r + ++ -CKS 304285 11/06/84 3.24 JOHNSON WINE - - - ' -- '50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304285 11/06/84 28.52- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3G4285 11/06/24 - 5.04 -- JOHNSON WINE_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304ZE5 11 /C6 /E4 3.24- JOHNSON W ?NE _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3U4285 11/C6/84 8.54- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304285 .. _. _ _ l l /C6184. -- - 3.74- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304285 11/C6184 3.74 JOHNSON WINE - _ - 50- 3710- 862 -86 - -- MANUAL 304225 11/C6/84 20902- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304285 11/C6/84. .. _ -_ 3.17- WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 304285 11/C6/E4 .16 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304285 11/06/84 15.39- JOHNSON MINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 304285 11 /C6 /84___� 161.82- - -- - -14.40 - -- JOHNSON _WINE -- ---- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 304285 11/C6184 JOHNSON WINE - - - - -� --- -'� - -- -50- 4628- 822 -82"— ._ - - - - MANUAL 304285 11/06/84 1.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3U4285 11/C6/84 3.00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 304295 11/[6/84 252.18 JOHNSON WINE _ _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 304285 ll/C6184 174.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL _- `3U4285 11 /06/84 1 61 .82 JOHNSON _WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 304285 11/C6184 1.50 JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82' _ - MANUAL 304285 11106/84 7.20 JOHNSON NINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - • r 1984 OF EOIAA I CHECK IST °_R 1C -31 -E AGE 17 CHECK _DATE ____._ AMOUNT- _..__.. _.___.. VENDOR 6, MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 - - MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 3U4285 11/06/84 427.11 JOHNSON WI.4E 304285 11/061E4 _ 162.12 JOHNSON WINE 304285 11/C6/84 13.50 JOHNSON W *NE 304285 11/06/84 158.52 JOHNSON WINE 304285 _ 11/[6/84 769.97_ JOHNSON W1 14E 304285 11106/84 174.50 JOHNSON VINE 3U4285 11/06/84 1.S1 JOHNSON WINE 304285 11/[6/84 _ _._162.12 -_ .__ JOHNSON WINE 304285 11/06/E4 1.50- JOHNSON WINE 3L;42 R5 11/[6/84 1.50 JOHNSON WINE 304285_ -_ _11/C6184 8.30- JOHNSON _WINE 3U4285 11/[6/84 14.40 JOHNSON WINE MANUAL 304451 1.913.26 + .08 GUALITY ITEM DES CRIPTION _____.._______ACCOUNT NO * -_INV. #- P.0* -e MESSAGE _ 50 -4628- 842 -E4 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 - - MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 -- MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL -- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 - MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 - - MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 - -- MANUAL r t f f t i 11/±76/84 27.32- QUALITY 304368 10/31/84__ _. 2.569.32- MUTUAL BENEFIT_ 11/C6/E4 7 *28- 29569.32 + WINE rrrrrr 304415 10/311 E4 -.. 6.156.50 MED CENTER _------- .. ^6QUALITY WINE. -- -_ -..- ._ - __ -.... _. - -- *trrfr 304435 11/06/84 7.47- PRIOR WINE CO 304435 11/06/84 373.42 PRIOR MINE CO :304451 11/[6184 18.53- QUALITY ttfrrr **+ -CKS DISABILTY PREM 1.0- 4158- 510 -51 _ MANUAL * ** -CKS EMP HOSP 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL j * + *- CKS 304451 11/±76/84 27.32- QUALITY MINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 3C4451 11/C6/E4 7 *28- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 304451 -_ _ _. -_ 11,/ 06/ 84____- ___.---- _------- .. ^6QUALITY WINE. -- -_ -..- ._ - __ -.... _. _ ...-- •--- _,--- .._... —_- 50- 3710- 842 -84 - - _ MANUAL 304451 11/06/E4 6.59- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL :304451 11/[6184 18.53- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 30.4451 _ 11/06/84 __..,_..._ 3.19-.- QUALITY WINE_ ._..__ _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304451 11/C61E4 6.75- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304451 11/06184 9.11- GUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL j- 3Q4451 11/ 06/E4..1,3 QUALITY _ - WINE _ _. _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 - -- _ MANUAL 304451 11/06/84 1.83- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11/06/84 .08 GUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11106/84. _.- __.___._...__ 9.67- _., _...-_-_QUALITY WINE _ _ _._.._.___- . —_ -_50 -3710- 862 -86 _ ._ MANUAL 304451 11/C6/84 1.F3- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11/C61E4 1.93- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11/C6/84._____ -- 7___36.75- QUALITY _WINE . 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -__ MANUAL 304451 11106/84 3.17- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 304451 111706/86 6.79- QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL .304451 11 /C6 /E4. ._ _.....___. 3 64 .2 5 _ _ .___QUALITY WINE _ _ __. -__ 50- 4628- 822 -82_ _ —_____ MANUAL 304451 I1/L'6/84 1,366.25 GUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 304451 11/06/E4 337.54 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 159. aQ -- GUALITY _. WINE_- ----- ._..�_ - - -_. -- _----- 4628- 842 -E4 -- - - - -- ---- ---- . - -- MANUAL I 304451 1110E/E4 329.50 QUALITY WINE —• -50- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 304451 11/C6/84 926 *50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL J 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 10-31 -84 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE 4r0UNT- -., - -_ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INY. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 3U4451 ll/C6184 91.85 GUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 304451 ll/C6/84 91.85 _ -_ QUALITY WINE _- _ - 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL of 304451 11/C6/84 91.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11/061E4 455.38 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ,. 304451 ll/C6184 1,837.75 GUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 11•/06/84 - - 4.39- - - QUALITY WINE - - -- 5C- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 304451 llfG6184 483.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 69391.96 •� ra «rrr a «« -CKS .sue 3C4540 ll/C6184 5.02- TWIN CITY 'WINE -50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 304540 11/06/84 251.43 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL .� 3U4540 11/06/84 3.90 TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 250.31 + J ..Fi r * « « +a rrr -CKS 304587 11 /C6 /E4 5.20 VINITALIA 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL i 3045 E1 ll/C6/84 450.00 YINITALIA 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 455.20 • J «rrarr «rr -CKS 344588 10/31/84 235.40 WESTERN LIFE EMP LIFE 10 -4157- 510 -51 MANUAL i 4 235.40 •.rear �.. rr« -CKS s, 304805 10/31/84 SD0.)0 CITY OF EDINA CHANGE FUND- — -10- 3800 = 000 -00 — MANUAL 500.00 « +ar «rr + +r-CKS 178,028.54 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND .i 1.321.99 FUND 2C TOTAL PARK FUND 254.67 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 109819.42 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND �. 7.404.60 _ FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 29506.95 FUND 28 TOTAL _ RECREATIGN CENTER FUND 235.64 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND _3_,909.21 — FUND 30 TOTAL WAT--RWORK FUND 160.99 _ FUND 40 TOTAL SEWER RENTAL FUND 2819659.41 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 606.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION 92 486,907.42 TOTAL v �i 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 1 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV* N PaO. # MESSAGE 304700 11/05/84 29000.00 US POSTMASTER HOSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 29000.00 • a•r *rr - * ** -CKS _ 307055 11/05/81 -- -- 397.66 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27= 4120. 664=66 MANUAL 307055 11/05/84 206.00 BRAEMAR P =TTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4202 - 660 -66 MANUAL 307055 11/05/E4 21.39 BRAEMAR FETTY CASH CASH 27 -4290- 660 -66 MANUAL 07055 11/[5184 _ _ 34 *25 _ —PETTY - BRAEMAR PETTY CASH - _ PETTY CASH— _ 27 -4500- 660 -66 _ _ MANUAL 307055 11/05/E4 23.14 BRAEMAR P7-TTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4504- 661 -66 MANUAL 307055 11/05/84 32.23 BRAEMAR PETTY CASH PETTY CASH 27- 4624- 664 -66 MANUAL 714.67 a - - - - -- - -- *r• *•• •a• —CKS 3U7174 11/05/84 1459000000- 1ST SD BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 307174 11/05/84 1459000.00 1ST SD BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL ••a *•* *** -CKS 3U7203 11/C5/E4 109.00 K KARDELL MONEY ROLLS 20- 3500- 000 -00 MANUAL 100.00 r• *•r• *r* —CKS 30 11/C51E4 18,482.67 S TREASURER PERA PERA CONT MANUAL 189482.67 * r * * *r • - - - -- - - --- — — - - - -- - - - -- * *• -CKS 307523 11/05/84 7,482.78 SOCI%L SECURITY- CONTRIB 4149-510 -51 MANUAL — 7,482.78 * — — -FICA _10- — - -- *•••ar * ** -CKS 30770.1 11/05/84 348.96 MENARDS FENCE & POSTS 10 -4504- 318 -30 MANUAL .307701 11/C5184 189.70- MENARDS LUMBER CORRECTION 10 -45C4- 318 -30 MANUAL 159.96 a - -- - - -- afaak* *•+ -CKS 310289 11/13/84 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICSE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 MANUAL 100.00 + ••rar• •** -CKS 311135 11 /13 /84 — 178.69- EAGLE -WINE INVENTORY 50 =4632= 822 -82 -- MANUAL 178.69 • 0000•* -- -- *** -CKS i 311415 11/13/84 1095?2.50 MED CENTER HOSPITALIZATION 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 1095'82.50 + — ----- - - - --- - - -- -- k•r *•• * ** -CKS • * 4 1 4l 7 '1 1 1964 CITY OF EOIhA CHECK NO* DATE AMOUNT 0 311433 rR *rf f 311435 f f f i i r 3132i 3 31323 3132,, 3 3132L3 31 32C 3 3132,-3 313203 31 32L 3 31 32L 3 3132L3 31 32�- 3 31 32L 3 31 32L 3 3132L3 3132u3 31 32u 3 313213 3132_3 ffrtf r 31 311 3 , 313714 +frf *r 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 314391 31 4 39 1 314391 314391 314391 11/13/F4 109.80 109.80 + CHICK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 2 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO* INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE PAUSTIS 8 SONS _ - INVENTORY _ ____ - 50- 4632 - 862 -86 -_ _ - __ -- -- ._.. MANUAL--- 11/13/84 - -- - 12r419.J2 11/13/84 9,365.34 11/13/84 CKS 11/13/84 17.33 PRIOR WINE 104.36 INVENTORY 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 569.60 17.33 • 10.63- 11/13/84 39.63 11/13/84 19.63 11/13184 19171.49 11/13/84 - 19072.30 11/13/84 307.82 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL * ** -CKS 11/13/84 4.J0 KARDELL P =TTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES------10-4206-120-12- ELECTRIC MANUAL 11/13/84 9.15 KARDELL PETTY CASH ME =TING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 11/13/E4 21.25 KARDELL F:-'TTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES 4206- 200 -20 MANUAL 11/13184 7.75 KARDELL PETTY CASH _ _ MEETING EXPENSES _10- 10 -4206- 260 -26 MANUAL 11/13/84 5.25 K4RDELL ° =TTY CASH MEETING EXPENSES 10 -4206- 421 -42 MANUAL 11/13/84 34.44 KARDELL PETTY CASH MEETING_ EXPENSES S_ES____ -4206- 422- 42_ MANUAL 11/13/84 4.40 KARDELL rETTY CASH POSTAGE __10 10- 4290 - 180 -18 MANUAL 11/13/84 1.22 KAROFLL P7-'TTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 301 -30 MANUAL 11/13/84 7.95 KARDELL r----TTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-45C4- 140 -14 MANUAL 11/13/84 3.18 KARDELL P--- TTY CASH SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 200 -20 MANUAL 11/13/84 5.40 KARDELL F =TTY CASH SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 MANUAL 11/13/E4 50.QC KARDELL PETTY CASH - SUPPLIES 4504 - 440 -44 MANUAL 11/13/84 2.96 KARDELL PETTY CASH __ ___10- SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 490 -49 _ MANUAL 11/13/84 6.66 KARDELL PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 500 -50 MANUAL 1 11/13/84 5.29 KARD17LL FE TTY CASH SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 MANUAL 11/13/84 9.96 KARDELL P--TTY CASH PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 200 -20 MANUAL 11/13/84 14.34 KARDELL P =TTY CASH PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4612- 560 -56 MANUAL 11/13/84 3.82 KARDELL PETTY CASH -- - PHOTO SUPPLIES - - -- - -- -- -- 10- 4620 - 560 -56 MANUAL 197.02 • * * *- CKS 11/13/84 94.84 L L DISTRIBUTION CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 684 -68 MANUAL 94.84 * 11/13/84 346.00 PAM 90NZELET INST FEE ART CENTER 23 -4100- 614 -61 MANUAL 1 346.70 * 11/13/84 - - 328.66 11/13/84 12r419.J2 11/13/84 9,365.34 11/13/84 19920.67 11/13/84 383.92 11/13/84 104.36 11/13/84 - - - - - -� 1,943.22 11/13/84 569.60 11/13/84 10.63- 11/13/84 39.63 11/13/84 19.63 11/13184 19171.49 11/13/84 - 19072.30 11/13/84 307.82 1 1 1 1 1 1 * ** -CKS -- - -- NORTHERN STATES - - - .- ELECTRIC - - - - - - -- -- - 10- 4252- - 301 -30 -- - - -- MANUAL NOP.T'iERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 321 -30 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC _10 -4252- 322 -30 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES -LECTRIC _ _ 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 345 -30 MANUAL _ NORTHERN STATES _ _ ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 358 -30 MANUAL NORTH---RN STATES ELECTRIC _ 10 -4252- 375 -30 _ MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES _ CORRECTION ,- 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL NCRTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL NIRTH =RN 3TATTS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 460 -46 MANUAL AORTHERN STATES _ ELECTRIC _- _ 10- 4252- 520 -52 MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ?L_CTRIC 10- 4252 - 540 -54 _ MANUAL NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 20- 1130- 000 -00 MANUAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 1984 Y OF EDINA CHECK`" ISTER 11-19- to GE z CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOI ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. ■ MESSAGE 314391 11/13/El 388.59 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 20- 4252 - 629 -62 MANUAL I; 314391 _ 11/13/84 728.63 _, NORTHER.N STATES ELECTRIC 20- 4252- 646_ -64 MANUAL a 314391 11/13/84 - - 287.50 NllRTi =RN STATES ELECTRIC 23- 4252 - 611 -61 314391 11/13/84 174.79 NCRTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26 -4252- 689 -68 MANUAL '{ 314391 11/13/84 19038.47 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27- 4252- 661 -66 MANUAL -- - - 314391 11/13/84 97.54 - NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 2t =$f52- 662 =66 MANUAL I' 314391 11/13/84 49308.15 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 708 -70 MANUAL 1O 314391 11/13/84 -- 232934 NORTHERN STATES_ - ELECTRIC 29- 4252 - 721 -72 MANUAL. 314391 11/13/84 59198.59 NORTHERN- STATES ELECTRIC 30 -4252- 781 -78 MANUAL 514391 11/13/84 4.25 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 30- 4252- 783 -78 MANUAL 314391 - - 11/13/84_ -_ 1600 NORTHERN STATES _ ELECTRIC 30 -4252- 784 -78 MANUAL _{•I 314391 11/13/84 29218.32 N^RTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 40 -4252- 801 -80 MANUAL 314391 11/13/84 568.50 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 50- 4252- 821 -82 MANUAL 314391 11/13/84 _ 1,052.19 _ NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL 314391 11/13/84 - 433.38 RORTHERN STATES _ -- ELECTRIC 50 4252- 86186 MANUAL ' 469373.27 •.rf.• sr* -CKS 314396 11/13/84 60.25 NW BELL.__ _______TELEPHONE _ 10- 4226- 160 -16 _ MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 19717.87 NW BELL TELEPHONE - 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 309.63 ,t. NW BELL TELEPHONE 20- 4256- 622 -62 MANUAL 314396 11 /13/84 11.60 NW B =LL TELEPHONE 20 -4256- 646 -64 MANUAL_j 314396 11/13/84 - - 129.28 -NN BELL TELEPHONE 3= 4256 = 611 -61 MANUAL 314396 11/13/E4 47.24 NW BELL TELEPHONE 26- 4256- 689 -68 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 _ 325.52 _ _ _ NW BALL _ TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 611 -66 MANUAL___ - 314396 11/13/84 315.04 NW BELL +� - TELEPHONE- 28- 4256- 708 -70 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 46.58 NW BELL TELEPHONE 29 -4256- 721 -72 MANUAL 314396 11/13/E4 210.30 NW BELL TELEPHONE 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 98.97 NW BELL TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 148.46 NW BELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 177.54 _ kW BrLL TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 841 -84 _ MANUAL 314396 11/13/84 127.24 NW BELL TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 39725.52 •ri -CKS •rrr.� - - - - - -- - -__ - -- -- •314740 11/13/84 30.00 MARY NELSON MUNICIPAL BANQUET 10- 4200 - 500 -50 MANUAL 'I 324004 11/06184 14809 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 440 -44 32 40 0.4 11/06/84 29.39 _ AMERICAN LINEN _ LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 482 -48 9LAUNDRY 324004 11/06/84 147.3- _____ AMERICAN LINEN 10 -4262- 520 -52 324OU4 11/06/84 11.30 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 20- 4262 - 628 -62 32400.4 11/061E4 9.50 AMERICAN LINEN CONT REPAIRS 27 -4200- 661 -66 «j 324004 11/08/84 70.78 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27= 4262=661 =66 324004 11/06/84 68.53 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 324UL4 11/06/84 49.61 AMERICAN LINEN _ LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 841 -84 324004 11/06/84 _ 93.94 AMERICAN LINEN - LAUNDRY 04262 - 861286 - 628.53 • 11- 324005-11 / 0 8 / 8 4 34.00 - AUDIO GROUP` ADYERTI §IN6 0�4211i�822 -82 t% 324005 11/08184 34.00 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 1 ' "j %F 1 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 4 1 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE v 68.00 * 1 324007 11/13/84 65.00 APEX PEST CONTROL CONT REPAIRS 20- 4248 - 646 -64 65.00 - 1Yi i 324UU8 11/13/E4 82.39 BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 783 -78 324U08 _ 11/13/8 _ _ _ 127.87 -- _KAMAN KAMAN EfEAIrNG 8 SPLY -- REPAIR PARTS 30 -4540- 783 -78 ' y 210.26 *ff*f r +** -CKS 91 1 31401 3 11/13/84 - - - - - - 85989 ALTERNAT03 REBUILD -- - GEN SUPPL_I_E_S 10- 4504 - 301.30 324013 11/06/84 75.27 -- _ - ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPP 10 -4504- 335- 30 - - -- - - - - -- - - y 314013 11/13/81 355.00 AL TER NA TOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 1 324013 11/13/84 74.25 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - -- - ----- -- - 590.41 - * -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- ----- - - ----- - - - - -- 3i 1 * ** -CKS y 324024 11/14/84 16.65 ARTJSTAT INC PRINTING 23- 4600- 610 -61 1 16.65 324025 11/08/84 12.00 ALFONS ANDERSSON CONT SERV 27- 4200 - 661 -66 1 12.00 + ff +f :f CKS 1 324028 11/08/84 -- - _. 66.80 BEER YHOL= SALERS INVENTORr 27- 4630- 664 -66 1) 324U28 11/13/E4 4,457.50 BEER WHOL= SALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 1 324U28 11/13/E4 39005.45 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 324028 11/14/84 - - - 29674.25 - - -- BEER WHOLESALERS- -- _ INVENTORY 50 -4632- 822 -82 - - _ - -- 10,204.00 + 1 * ** -CKS "! 1 324U33 11/08/84 177.75___ TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 324U33 11/08/84 278.10 _BERG=ORD __ BERGFOP.D TRUCKING - INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842- 84 - - - -. 324033 11/08/24 305.10 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 1 760.95 • 1 '• "" f f f- CKS 1 324039 11/06/84 300.77 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC _ -FILL MATERIAL 10 -4518- 345 -30 300.77 + 1 * *+ -CKS 1 1 324041 1.1/13/8 _317.50 _ _BURY 8_ CARL_SON__INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 317.50 r -_- _ - -- -- - "S 1 :2*4**44..- -- -- -- *** -CKS 0 11/06/84 50.52 BILL BOYER FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1 3 984 Y OF ED INA CHEC, ASTER � v 11 -19• AGE 5 CHECK NO* DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE o ---�}� 314044 11/13/84 52.26 BILL BOYER FORD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 !Z 102.78 • f.ff*f * ** -CKS 1 ,s 324047 11/08/84 441.58 - BROYN -FACT-6 PHOTO SUPPLIES 1 -456-8- 422 -42 a7 441.58 ftf f * • f *f -CKS 324U49 11/08/84 - -_ -_- 66 *50 BURESH ROBERT MEETINGS 10- 4206 - 440 -44 66.50 - -- }- -- ffffff *** -CKS •' 314053. 11/13/84 96.50 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 301 -30 324U53 11/13/84 17.37 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10 -4250- 446 -44 324U53 11/13/84 - 48.25 - BROWNING FERRIS _- REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 520 -52 324053 11/13/84 96.50 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 540 -54 314U53 11/13/84 61.05 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION_ 20- 4250 - 628 -62 324053 11/13/84 50.18 BROWNING _ FERRIS _ - REFUSE COLLECTION 20- 4250 - 646 -64 324053 11/13/84 11 *58 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 20 -4250- 646 -64 324U53 11/13/84 9.65 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 23- 4250- 610 -66 324053 11/13/84- _ - 81.06 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 27 =4250= 661 -66 S44U53 11/13/84 21.23 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250 - 662 -66 324053 11/13/84 63.69 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 28- 4250 - 708 -70 314U53 11/13/84 223.88 _ BROWNING _ _ FERRIS- REFUSE COLLECTION - _ 50- 4250- 841 -84 324053 11/13/84 270 *20 BROWNING FERRIS REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 861 -86 19051.14 324054 11/13/E4 79 *20 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 79.20 fftfff 324U64 11/14/84 130 *00 - THERMAL CO CREDIT 28- 4248 - 707 -70 324064 11/14/84 125.75 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248- 707 -70 324064 11/13/84 91.14 THERMAL CO CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 707 -70 - - - -- - -- - - - 86.89-* - - - -- -- f * f f * f 324068 11/08/84 324068 11/08/84 _ -- -- *f ►if f 32407 "2 11/08/24 324U73 11/14/84 324U73 11/13/84 324U73 11113/84 324074 11/08/84 *** -CKS - 45.70 CAPITOL ELECTRONICS EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 48.45 CAPITOL ELECTRONICS EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 94.1 5 - - -- - - - - - -- - - - *** -CKS 136.58 * DAILY'CONSTRUCTION REPORTS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 t" 21.25 CITY BEER _ _INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 103.50 - -- CITY BEER - -�- INVENTORY ._._ ___ _ 112.66 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 -324-22--* 237.41 'III 344.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON KENNEL SERV 10- 4278 - 470 -47, * ** -CKS 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 6 V . CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT __ VEN002 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 324075 11/14/84 10.50 CLAN�Y DRUG INC— —GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 260 -26 J. y 324075 11/14/84 2.40 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 421 -42 1` I_ 324U75 11/14184 20.91 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 ;� 324075 11/14/84 14.03 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO SUPPLIES. 10 -4508- 200 -20 _ y ' 47.84 t * ** -CKS y _ 324U78 /14/84 309.75 COLA_ BOTTLING INVENTOY_ 50- 4632- 822 -82 324078 11/13/84 985.40 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVtNTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 y 324078 11/14/P4 562.20 COCA COLA BOTTLING IhVENTOT 50- 4632- 862 -86 19857.35 ly' **t -CKS 324080 11/0684 581.16 CONT-'WINN� CONCES8IONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 — y 581.16 *, 324081 11/08/84 98.27 CONY SAFETY E9UIP GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 260 -26 - -- -- — y 98.27 ,R j. 324082 11/06%84 67.50 CONWAY FIRE T SAFETY CONY REPAIRS 14248= 560 56 i'' y 324082 11/13/84 399.65 CONWAY FIRE 8 SAFETY CLOTHING REPLACE 10- 4574 - 440 -44 467.15 • -' y fat +t a f ft- CKS 1'` ' ; __.__— 324U90 11/13/84 72.26 CERT POWER TRAIN PARTS __ 10- 4620 - 560-56 _ 1 • - y 72.26 fafta• * +* -CKS - cy i 32409.7 11/08/8_4 54.65 COURTNEY MAYNE MILEAGE 10 =4208- 100 -10 54.65 ti .A ta•faa — - -- -- - -.. ,. - -- - -- CKS 324U99 11/06/84 44.46 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324U99 11/13/84 17.26 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66 �•' — -- — _ 61.72 :. a•ftat —CKS y 324107 11/14/84 23.00 DALCO CORPORATION REPAIR PARTS 20- 4540 - 646 -64 -- - - — - -- 23.00 * ;, y 324108 11/06/84 137.50 DALE GREEN COMPANY SOD 8 BLACK DIRT 20- 4562 - 642 -64 - - - -- -- - -- _ 137.511 • tff -CKS -ol 12 324110 11/13/84 401.85 DAVIDSON DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 '13 r� 324110 11/13/84 19000 DAVIDSON DIST INC INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 4 ' 4984 Y OF EDINA CHECI = °° " ;ISTER 11 -19- o AGE 7. CHECK NO. DATE -. AMOUNT - -- - VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION - - - -- -- - -- ACCOUNT N0. INV. - - - •- - -- I P.O. # MESSAGE z • �J 324110 11/14/84 165.35 _ — - — DAVIDSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 324110 11/13/84 119.70 DAVIOSEN DIST INC INVENTORT 50= 4632=842-84 I, 705.20 1. 324111 11/0684 — -- 287,88 CAVIS WATER E9UIP CO REPAIR PARTS 287.88 • I;° " �I raarrr * * *- -CKS— I••I - 324114 11/06/84 -_ DELEGARD TOOL CO CREDIT 10- 4580 - 560 -56 �- 324114 11/06/84 _ ___6.90 - 8.19 - DELEGARD TOOL CO TOOLS 10- 7►58�560 -56 1.29 + " rrraaa * ** -CKS 324120 11/08184 39033.29 DORSEY WIND14ORST UNAPP SURPLUS 66- 2490 - 000 -00 - -- - -- 39033.79 + - - -- - - - -- rrrrr+ + +*-CKS 324125 11/13/84 128.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 335 -30 324125 11/C6/84 7000 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 324125 11/13/84 437.25 MERIT 6UPDLY PARTS 10- 4620. 560 -56 324125 11/14/84 462.12 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 324125 11/13/84 117.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEM SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 324125 11/13/84 - - 1 9519.05 - - MERIT SUPPLY '- - - -- -' -CLEAN SUPPLIES —20- 4512 - 646 -64 - -- - - - -- -- -- 324125 11/13/E4 19526.73 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -7U 49197.15 *aa -CKS :::*1*30 11/13/84 25.00- DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY - CONT REPAIRS - -- 25.00 aaarar - .. - - --- --- - - -- — - -- - - - - - -- - - -CKS -- ***- - - -- - - - - - - 324134 11/14/84 36.75 CITYWIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50 -4248- 841 -84 -- - -- - - --- -- 36.75 -� - - - - - - -- - - -- -- -- - - - - -- - -- �I"i . aar +ar _ __ ..-_ -• _ --- --- --- __._ - -- __ - -_ ___ -_ * ** -CKS 324136 11/06/84 361.20 EARL F ANDERSEN LUMBER 20- 4604 - 646 -64 i ' 361.20 * _' * ** -CKS 324139 11/06/84- -- 77.74 EDINA ELECTRIC CO CONT REPAIRS 20= 4248 - 646 -64 F 324139 11/13/84 119925 EDINA ELECTRIC CD CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 196.99 + tara*a *•* -CKS 3[4143 _ 11/08/84 '— 49.72 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 2�`= 4624 = 664 =b6 73; 324143 11/08/84 43.51 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 664 -66 : "•' 93.23 i . • - - - - - • - -.: - ,. •- . _ _ _ � ____ -._s -_- ".� _�- —�__.� - __ .._- mss.. -;� - _ � . _. - - _.,.4 ��—. 1964 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 8 _ - -_ CHECK-N0. DATE_____ - AMOUNT VENDOR — ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE 324148 11/13/84 27.50 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 449 -44 j7 324148 -- 11/06/84 78.84 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 106.4 4 * '- •cart• - - --- - -- - - - - -- -- -- --- -- - -- — -- ara- - -CKS 324150 11/13/84 365.63 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 365.63 • aaaara aaa -CKS 324162 11/13/84 — 1.91 -- — FOWLER ELECTRIC CREDIT 104540- 560 -56 324162 11/13/84 11.81 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 I 3Z 4162 _ _11/13/84_ 23.36 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3"2416 2 11/08/86 _ 23.36 27w,-4540--66Z-;66 56.62 • aaaaa• - - - - - - -- -- -- --- -- -- - - ---- — — -- --- - - -rra -CKS 324164_ 11/06/E4 1.56 FREEWAY DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324164 11/06/84 13.25 FREEeA -T DODGE INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14.81 a ***-C KS _- 3.2_41_67_ -- 1_1/08/84 400_.00_ FIRST NATIONAL BANK UNAPP SURPLUS 66 -2490- 000 -00 400.00 a►aaaa CKS . 324175 11/14/84 88.62 FRITZ QO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 664 -66 $8.62 r 324176 11/08/E4 248.00 G.L.CONTRACTING INC CONT SERV 20- 4200- 642 -64• 248.00 + _ artraa rrr -CKS 324185 11/13/84 44.29 GOODIN CO REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 783 -78 - - - -- -- - 44.29 + -_ `. i •rrras . *aa -CKS _ — 324194 11/06/E4 19.00 GENERAL C_OMMUNICATNS EQUIP MAINT 10- 4226- 301 -30 324194 11/08/84 10D.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADI6 SERV _ _ 10- 4294420 -42 324194 11/06/E4 266.25 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERY 10- 4294 - 560 -56 385.25 • _ aaraar +a• -CKS 324199 11/06/84 8.50 G T PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 i . 324199 11/06/84 24.57 G T PARTS - REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 r It 1984 Y OF EDINA CHECI )ISTER 11 -19- PAGE 9 G CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION , ACCOUNT N0. INV. R P.O. # MESSAGE 11/13/84 324209 11/13/84 324209 11/13/84 PARTS �z 10- 4540 - 560 -56 30.12 33.07 r PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 87.35 _' _PARTS GENUINE 324200 11/13/84 96.00 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GEN SUPPLIES 10 -454- 510 -51 I 10- 4620- 560 -56 122.66 + 96.00 + w 17 - * ** -CKS I!I I� f rfr -CKS l'i I� I - 3242u6 11/08/84 828.28 C & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 301 -30 i 3242L6 11/08/84 35.20 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 540 -54 324206 11/08184 459.15 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 32 420 6 11/[8/84 227.47_ G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 20- 4262 -_ 646 -64 3242E'6 - 11/08/84 -- - 121.40 _ - G ^& K SERVICES- LAUNDRY 30 -42- 62783 -78 - - -- 3242a6 11/08/84 189.74 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40- 4262- 801 -80 19861.24 # 324207 11/13/84 2,442.15 GRIGGS BEER INVENTORY 50 -4630- 842 -84 324207 11/14/84 29768.45 GRIGGS__BE =R INVENTORY 50- 4630 -_ 862 -86 324237 11/14/84- - - -- 1,522.25- .-_ - - -- GRIGGS BEER - -- I NV ENTORY 50- 4632 - 822- 82--- - - - - -- 69732.85 r* * # ## + ** -CKS 3242U9 11/13/84 324209 - -- 11 /13/84 - - - -- 324239 11/13/84 324209 11/13/84 324209 11/13/84 324209 11/13/84 # f f f # # 324213 11/08/84 324214 11/13/84- -- 32421 4 11/13/84 10- 4540- 560 -56 _ 4.85 - 324220 - -- 11/08/84 - 324220 11/08/84 324220 1.1/06/84 324222 11/06/84 * * # #r# 7.5.96 - GENUINE' FARTS CREDIT 10- 4540- 560 -56 _ 4.85 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 =56 6.94 GENUIPIEI PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 30.12 GENUINE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 87.35 _' _PARTS GENUINE _ PARTS PARTS - 10 -4620- 560 -56 69.36 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 122.66 + * ** -CKS 240.70 240.00 441.86-- 7.03 448.89 * 234.36 360.]0 1 9499.00 29093.36 i LEROY H LIBBY - -CONT SERV 30 -4200- 780 -78 H.R. f o L U COMPANY --w E LYf -h 6 SUPPLIES 10- 4610- 560 -56 H.R. TOLL COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 MAR NED uUMBE R CO MAR NED LUMBER CO MAR NED LUMBER CO 314915 HEDBERG & SONS CO 314.1 S 324244___._. 11/13/84. 645.00 - 645.00 6 * f* -CKS GEN SUPPLIES0- 4507- 646 -64 LUMBER 20 -4604- 646 -64 LUMBER 20 -4604- 646 -64 * * *- CKS SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 27- 4522 - 662 -66 * ** -CKS II I NAYDEN MURPHY Too LS 104580= 301 =30 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 10 v 184 13.50 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES _ _CHECK N0. DATE _- _- AMOUNT_ - - VrNDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O._ A MESSAGE_ HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 328 -30 324279 11/08/84 _ _ _25.00___JERRYS_ KREMER - fafff a HOWE GEN 10 -4504- 335 -30 324279 � 30.36 aaf -CKS ., 324248 11/13/84 163.43 HARMON GLASS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5.40 _ - ___324248 - - 11/13/84 -- 39.35 HARMON GLASS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 11/08/84__ 3.58 JERRYS 202.78 HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 - �'i fafffa __ 23.58 ' JERRYS _OWN OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES •.� *aa -CKS 324279 11/08/84 55.60 JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 180 -18 REPAIR PARTS 324279 324279 11/08/84 - -- 11/08 117.39 - -- - -- JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE - - GEN SUPPLIES - - 10- 4504- 301 -30 - - - - -- - - s s s J s s s s J ; s ffffaf � 324283 11%13/84 1 364,46 JONES CHEMICALS INC WATER SUPPLIES 30- 4622 - 785 -78 1,364.40 • I � j is * ** -CKS - 1 tar -CKS _ 3243u0 -_ 11/06/84 - 195.90 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504- 622 -62 - - -- 195.90 * _ 324301 184 13.50 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 324279 11/08/84 50.95 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 328 -30 324279 11/08/84 _ _ _25.00___JERRYS_ KREMER OUR 8 ALIGN HOWE GEN 10 -4504- 335 -30 324279 11/08184 30.36 JERRYS _OWN OUR OWN __SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 340 -30- 324279 11/08/E4 5.40 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 421 -42 324279 _ 11/08/84__ 3.58 JERRYS OUR HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 324279 11/08/84 __ 23.58 ' JERRYS _OWN OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 324279 11/08/84 61.76 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 390 -30 324279 11/08/84 - 21.68 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE___ REPAIR_ PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 324279 11/08/84 4.50 JERRYS -OUR-- OWN HOWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 324279 11/08/84 95.35 ,,. JERRYS CUR OWN HOWE PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -30 324279 _ _ 11/08/84 _14.59 '�. JERRYS,OUR_OWk_ HOWE 10 -4580- 390 -30 324279 11/08/84 10.75 JERRYS OUR OWN -TOOLS HOWE PARTS 10- 4620 - '560 -56 324279 11/08/E4 4.10 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 627 -62 324279 11/08/84 ______ 42.68 0WA HOWE SUPPLIES _ 20- 4504- 628 -62 324219 11/08/84 193.09 -JERRYS-OUR JERRYS OUR OWN - -_ HOWE -GEN GEN SUPPLIES _ 20 -4504- 646 -64 324279 11/08/84 30.45- JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE CORRECTION 20 -4504- 708 -70 _ 324279 11/08/84 30.45 JERRYS HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 -_ 708 -70 324279 11/08/84 34.04 _OUR_OWN JERRYS OUR OWN -HOWE REPAIR PARTS _ 20- 4540- fi46 -64 324279 11/08/84 71.81 JERRYS OUR OWN HOVE PAINT 20- 4544 - 646 -64 324279 11/08/84_ - _ _11.47 JF7RRYS OUR OWN HOWE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 662 -66__ 324279 11/08/E4 ___ 18.60 J JERRY S OU,R OWN 'HDWE CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 707 -70 324279 11/08/84 30.45 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 708 -70 _ 314279_ 11/08/84 _ 3.79 JERRYS OWN HOWE TOOLS 28 -4580- 708 -70 324279 11108184 _ _ 28.85 JERRYS _OUR OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540- 783 -7$ 324279 11/08/84 12.06 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 821 -82 984.93 * ffffaf � 324283 11%13/84 1 364,46 JONES CHEMICALS INC WATER SUPPLIES 30- 4622 - 785 -78 1,364.40 • I � j is * ** -CKS - 1 tar -CKS _ 3243u0 -_ 11/06/84 - 195.90 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504- 622 -62 - - -- 195.90 * _ 324301 11/06/84 1.32.00_ KR£M- R_SPRG._R__ALIGN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 3243fj 1 11/06/E4 21.19 KREMER SPRG. 6 ALIGN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - AV 3243U1 11/06/84 27.79 KREMER SPRG. 8 ALIGN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 - - - - -- - -- - - 180.98 * �'� y 3243u2 11/13/84 49679.77 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 I,e,,� . s 0 198• Y OF EDINA CHEC LISTER 11- 19 -aAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE 49679.77 + ' #fttff •t# -CKS 32431:4 11/ ^6/84 27.13 KNOX LUMP =R CO_ GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504- 180 -18 3243C 4 11 /13/84 - - - 77.99 �- -- K40X LUMB: R CO - -- - GEN SUPPLIES - - - - - -- - -10- 4504- 301 -30 - -_ 3243u4 11/13/84 10.57 KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 32431:4 11/13/84 42.06 KNCX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS_ 20- 4540 - 646 -64 3243C4 11/13/84 77.65 KNOX LUMBER CC LUMBER _ 20- 4604- 646 -64 3243L4 11/14/84 40.71 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 20- 4604- 646 -64 324304 11/13/84 35.20 KNOX LUMP.?R CO LUMBER 20 -4604- 646 -64 3L43L4 11/14184 34.67 KNOX LUM8 =R CO _ _ _ LUMBER 20- 4604 - 646 -64 3243U4 11/13/84 8.35 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 354.33 f #ff#• ••+ -CKS 324311 11/13/84 40.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY V 27- 4630- 664 -66 U4311 11/13/84 39164.15 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE ! NVVENTORY 50 -4630- 822 -82 324311 11/13/84 59648.35 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 324311 11/13/84 59091.06 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 139943.56 * #*-CKS 314313 11/06/84 26.27 JOHN H FOSTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 26.27 f - - - - -- - ffft ## * ** -CKS 324317 11/13/84 660.70 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 322 -30 324317 11/C6/p4 46.17 LAWSON FPODUCTS GEN SUPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 324317 11/06/84 202.49 LAWSON PRODUCTS SIGNS 8 PCST$ - _ _ 10- 4542 - 325 -30 - Se 4317 11/13/84 247.61 LAWSON PRODUCTS SIGNS B POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 324317 11/13/84 428.26 LAWSON PRODUCTS =4620- 560 -56 324317 11/06184 110.88 _ LAWSON PRODUCTS __PARTS PARTS _10 _ 10- 4620- 560 -56 _ _ 324317 11/06/84 179.08 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 324317 11/06/84 109.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504 - 646 -64 324317 11/13/84 55.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES '- _ 20- 4504646 -64 - 324317 11/13/84 402.26 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 20 -4504- 646 -64 29442.07 314318 11/1:/84 111.75 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 440 -44 314318 11/14/84 12.00 LEEF BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 .5[4318 11/13/84 28.99 LIEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 27- 4262- 662 -66 314318 11/13/84 17.50 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 28- 4262- 708 -70 110.24 + 324319 11/06/84 210.00 LEITNER C)MPANY SOD B BLACK DIRT 27- 4562- 662 -66 210.00 • f ►fftt * ** -CKS 314323 11/13/84 - - - -4.50 - - - LINHOFF - -- - -_ - -- -'---P-HOT O SUPPLIES 10- 4508- 440 - -44 _---- _----- -__ - -- _ 4.50 • s s i 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. b P.O. 0 MESSAGE 324324 11/14/84 �- 756.55 - LOGIS SERVICSE 10- 4228 - 160 -16 324324 11/14/84 - 568.97 _ _ _ _ LOGIS SERVICE 10-4228-160-16 i 324314 11/14/P4 962.47 LOGIS SERVICE 10 -4230- 160 -16 324324 11/14/84 19230.72 LOGIS SERVICSE 10- 4230 - 160 -16 324324 -11 /14%84 -13 136.94 LOGIS SERVICE 10 -4233- 200 -20 324324 11/14/84 130136.94- LOGIS CORRECTION 10 -4233- 200 -20 ` 3 "14324 11 /14/84 19722.55 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4233 - 200 -20 324324 _ 11/14/84 _ 19847.79 _ ___ _ - -LOGIS - SERVICSE '10- 4233 - 200 -20- - 324324 11114/84 20737.20 LOGIS SERVICE 10 -4233- 200 -20 324324 11/14/84 1.00 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4233 - 200 -20 _ 324324 - 11/14/84 _ 963.29 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4233 - 420 -42 324324 11/14/84 806.70- LOGIS CORRECTION 10- 4233 - 420 -42 324324 806970 LOGIS SERVICSE 10 -4233- 420 -42 _ 324324 _11/14/84 11/14/84 19032.67 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4233 - 420 -42 324324 11/14/84 656.77 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4233 - 560 -56 324324 11/14/84_ 704.06 LOGIS SERVICSE 10- 4233 - 566 -56 _ 324324 11/14/84 2r 579.28 LOGIS SERVICE 10- 4906- 500 -50 _ 324324 11/14/84 620.16 LOGIS SERVICSE 30- 4232 - 780 -78 324324 11/14/84 - _ 836.72 LOGIS _SERVICE 30- 4232 - 780 -78 3e4324 11/14/84 620.17 LOGIS SERVICSE 40- 4232 - 800 -80 324314 11/14/f4 836.71.. LOGIS SERVICE 40- 4232 - 800 -80 324324 201.47 LOGIS SERVICSE 50- 4233 - 820 -82 324324 _11/14/84 11/14/84 423.99- �LOGIS SERVICE 50- 4233- 820 -82 324324 11/14/84 201.47 LOGIS SERVICSE 50- 4233 - 840 -84 324324 11 /14/E4 424.001 LOGIS_____ SERVICE 50- 4233 - 840 -84 324314 11/14/84 423999 __ LOGIS SERVICE 50- 4233 - 860 -86 324324 11/14/84 201.48 LOGIS SERVICSE 50- 4233 - 860 -86 209553.48 324325 11/13/84 214.14 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 214.14 *9999• *r* -CKS 114342 11/13/84 110.99 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 324342 11/13/84 58.94 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324342 11/13/£4 203.00 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 - - - -- - - -- - -- - 372.93 � - -- - --- - -- - -_ +9999* 324345 � I rrrrer -- 324353--. - s • - -_ * ** -CKS I 11/06/84 59469.75 METRO SEW---R 9 WATER BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 5 x469.75 + * ** -CKS 11/13/86 40.75 MINNESOTA GLOVE GE4 SUPPLIES 10 -4501- 301 -30 - 40.75 • i - 324355 11/,13/84 .324356 11/08/84 -* ** -CKS _ 315.38 MINNS071A BEARING CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 315.38 . I 238948 MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT BLUE PRINTING 10- 4570 - 260 -26 '1984 _,Y OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 314358 324359 324359 324359 324359 324359 324360 324360 324360 32 4360 rr *rr• 324366 324366 324366 314370 rr*rr r 324376 rr *rrr 314378 324378 314378 324379 324379 324380 324381 324381 324391 11/[8/84 11 /:]6/84 11/14/84 11/06/84 11/14/84 11/06/84 11/06/84 11/C6/84 11 /C6 /84 11/06/84 11/14/84 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/06/84 5.45 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 5.45 * 31.09 MODERN EQUIPMENT GEY SUPPLIES 31.00 • _-- - __- 11/13/84 79072.00 CHECK , t;TST =R V11 SALES INC AMOUNT VENDOR 4,634.57 ITEM DESCRIPTIO 238.48 * INVENTORY 11/14/84 2,708.60 190.94 3M ALARM SERVICE ALARM SERV 190.94 * 10 -4212- 300 -30 10-4540-560-56 - - - - -- 7.20 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 74.98 MINN 'ORO INC REPAIR PARTS 8.54 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTAS 55.33 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 38.86 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 184.91 * *r -CKS _ 10- 4504 - 335 -30 12.00 MINNESOTA WANNER- CONT REPAIRS 52.50 MINNESOTA WANKTR CONT REPAIRS 115.00 MINNESOTA WANNER SUPPLIES 17.50 MINNESOTA WANNER _GE4 GEN SUPPLIES 197.00 197.91 MINNESOTA BAR 559.24 MINNESOTA _________INVENTORY BAR _ INVENTORY 300. ?6 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 1.057.21 5.45 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 5.45 * 31.09 MODERN EQUIPMENT GEY SUPPLIES 31.00 • _-- - __- 11/13/84 79072.00 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY 11/13/84 4,634.57 MARK V11 SALES IVC INVENTORY 11/14/84 2,708.60 MARK V11 SALES INC INVENTORY TRIBUNE 14,415.17 * 10 -4212- 300 -30 10-4540-560-56 _ 75.20 - 11/06/84 35.40 METRO FONr_ COMM EQUIP RENTAL 11/06/84 4.72- METRO FON= COMM CREDIT 50- 4632- 822 -82 30.68 * - -- - -50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 11/14/84 8,726.25 THOMSEN 11 -19 -84 PAGE 13 N ACCOUNT NO. INV. S P.O. 0 MESSAGE ` - - -- -- - * ** -CKS . 50- 4304- 841 -84 10-4540-560-56. 11/13/84 112.80 10- 4540 - 560 -56 TRIBUNE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10 -4212- 300 -30 10-4540-560-56 _ 75.20 - 10- 4248- 560 -56 TRIBUNE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 t 20- 4504 - 646 -64 75.20 _ 20- 4504 - 646 -64 _ TRIBUNE __ ADVERTISING * ** -CKS 50- 4632- 822 -82 263.20 * - -- - -50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** -CKS 28 -4624- 704 -76 - - * *r -CKS _ 10- 4504 - 335 -30 - - - * ** -CKS 50- 4630- 842 -84 50 -4630- 862 -86 -- - -_. 50- 4632- 822 -82- -- - 10- 4226 - 301 -30 10- 4226- 301 -30 .; 11/14/84 8,726.25 THOMSEN NYBECK SERV LEGAL 10- 4100 - 220 -22 8,726.25 11/13/84 112.80 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10 -4212- 300 -30 11/06/84 _ 75.20 - STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 300 -30 11/06/84 75.20 STAR 8 _ TRIBUNE __ ADVERTISING -- - - - _ *_ 10- 4212- 420 -42 263.20 * V 1984 CITY Of !7OIN4 CHECK N ". DATE TREE INSPECTION TREc TRIMMING 10- 4242 - 353 -30 -1300- 324365 11/13/E4 314385 11/06/84 314335 11113/P4 324385 11/06/84 =�43P5 11/'!6/81 324385 11/06/84 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 324391 11/14/84 3!4391 11/14/84 3[4391 11/14/ °4 3,' 4391 11 /14 /84 324391 11/14/84 3244: 2 11 /13/84 324420 11/14/84 324421 11/13/E4 5244%1 11/13/34 3e4429 11/14/84 324302 11/14/84 324429 11/13/E4 3e4429 11/13/84 324434 11 /CS /o4 f e fit • 324439 11/06/84 324439 11/76/84 t \ 4 t t • 324441 11/ ^8/84 AMOUNT 240.00 360.77 540.00 8.40 F40. . -0 8.40- 1.08!1.,'0 • 4.79 14 °1 739.Jr 1 .650.92 99636.38 12,171.90 • 115.90 115.90 • 26.65 26.65 * 83. 1 4 249.12 332.26 * CHECK REG!ST!:R 11 -19 -84 PAGE 14 VENDO' ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. It P-0- p MESSAGE **k-CKS MCGUIRE ROEERT MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE INSP 1C- 4242- 353 -30 MCGUIRE ROBERT TREE INSPECTION TREc TRIMMING 10- 4242 - 353 -30 -1300- MCGUIRE R -)BERT TREE INSPECTION 60 011 -18 60 -1300- 011 -18 MCGUIRE 'OBE.kT MCGUIRE, R0 BERT TREE INSPECTION 60 -1300- 011 -18 CORRECTION 60- 1330 - °311 -18 N.S.P. COMPANY N.S.R. COMPANY EL =CTRIC 10 -4252- 345 -30 N.S.P. COMPANY ELECTRIC ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 570 -50 N.S.P. COMPANY cL'CTRIC 20- 4252- 629 -62 N.S.P. COMPANY - LEE CTRIC 20- 4252 - 646 -64 30-4252-781-78 NITT. COMPAfdY OLD DUTICH FOODS OLS04 CHAIN & CABLE OLS04 CHAIN & CABLE 341;.95 P =rSI COLA BOTTLING 2 9831.39* KUTHER DIST. 491.70 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING 701.55 P'�'eSI COLA BOTTLING 413&5--5-9-- 1,534.20 69.30 69.30 + 3,719.43 514.71 49234.14 16.80 PRINTERS SERVICE INC PRIOR LAKE AG PRIOR LAK: AG THE PRINT SHOP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 CONC= SSIONS 27- 4624- 664 -66 PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 REPAIR PARTS 20- 4540 - 646 -64 INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 lNVENTORTY 50- 4632- 842 -84 I NVENTOR TY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 EIJIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 707 -70 SAND GRAVEL 10 4 ** *-CKS **&-CKS * ** -CKS *• *-CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS - 522 - 318 -30 GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 _J * ** -CKS PRINTING 20 -4600- 628 -62 `j J� ,•1984 Y OF EDINA CHECk iTSTER 11 -19 -� PAGE 15 CHECK NC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. a MESSAGE t 186.80 + 324450 11/14/84 5R.00 PBS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 324450 11/14/84 -- - 27.20 PBE - -- - - - - - -- REPAIR PARTS---- - - -10- 4540 - 560 -56 - -- - ^ - - - -- - -- -- 85.20 * ** -CKS < 324452 11/06/84 5.38 QUICK SERV EATTERY REPAIR PARTS____.____ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324452 11/06/84 25.56 QUICK SERV EATTERY ___ REPAIR PARTS 104540- 560 -56 _ _ ' _ 30.64 # - * * *- CKS 324457 11/13/84 282.62 R.L.GOULD & CO.INC. GEN SUPPLIES 20- 4504- 646 -64 282.62 # - -- - -- - - -- *►ffrf *** —CKS 324460 11/14/84 121.65 FOYAL GROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 32446C. 11/13/84 245.95 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84_ 32446u 11/13/84 346.67 ROYAL CROWN BEV - _ ' _ __ _ INVENTORY — SD= 4632 - 862 -86 �' _ - - -- - 714.27 -- - -- - *** -CKS 324462 11/13/E4 7.50 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES REPA_IR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 324462 11/13/84 32.00 _ RENTAL EQUIP & SALES GEN SUPPLIES - __ _ 20-4504--646-64-------- _ -- - - - 39.50 324463 11/13/84 49646.10 REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 324463 11/13/84 3,151.90 REX DIST INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 324463 11/14/84 2,216.85 REX DIST INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 109014.85 . - - - - -- -- - - -- -- - - - -- *f #f #f * *r-CKS 324467 11/14/84 186.40 ROYAL BEVERAGE CO .0 50- 4630- 822 -82 324467 11/13/84 901.90 ROYAL BEV =RAGE CO INVENTORY_ 50- 4630 - 842 -84 324467 11/14/84 312.16 _ ROYAL BEVERAGE CO - — INVENTORY 1,400.46 * * ** -CKS 324469 11/08/84 82404 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 824.04 * - - -- -- f►frr# - -- -- -- -- - --- - _. * #: -CKS 324485 11/06184 1,840.94 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 324485 11/06/84 - - - - -- 106.00 - - -- STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHARGE 10- 3113 - 000 -00 1,946.94 -_ # --- - - - -- ------- -- - - - - -- f #ffff *** -CKS v 19F4 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 16 v CHECK _N0._ DATE _ ^- _AMOUNT _VENDOR _ _ _ _ ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV* 4 P.O.- q._ MESSAGE _ 324490 11/14/84 628.88 _ - _ SHERWIN_ WILLIAMS PAINT _ 20- 4544 - 646 -64 - 628.88 + ++ -CKS 324492 11/06/84 5.26 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324492 11/13/84 6.25 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10 -_ 4540 - 560 -56 _ 324492 11/13/84 - _ 17.51 -- _REPAIR SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 29.02 + i,. • 31-4493 - 11 /13 /84 6,191.75 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 - - -- 324493 11/13/84 645.05 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC 6. 50- 4630- 862 -86 31-4493 11/13/84 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 _29682.75 99519.55 ,i -- ----- - - - --- - - - -- - - - - - -- - --- - - -- - -- - - +►fffa + +* -CKS 324498 11/13/84 28.80 STARK ELECTTRONICS• REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 ., 28.80 + aw +faw + ++ -CKS 324562 11/13/84 - 8,82 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 324502 11/13/84 25.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 32452 11/13/84 77.80 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 324552 11/13/84 15.57 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 y 324502 11/06/84 2.18 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 324502 11/06/E4 28.44- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CREDIT 10- 4620 - 560 -56 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- 100.93- * - - - -- -- 3245u3 11/13/84 36.12 SUBURBAN SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 , 324543 _ 11/13/84 _ _ _ 46.85 _PLUMB SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 324503 11/13/84 32.09 SUBUlBA'N PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 788 -78 115.06 + f + +w +s aaf -CKS 324505 11/06/84 28.41 SUN ADVERTISING 10 -1210- 140 -14 y 28.41 + - afifii - - i*i -CKS y � 324508 11/08/84 43979 ST_ PAUL_ BOOK : 10 -4504- 420 -42 324508 11/08/84 _ 13.35 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 y 3245:+8 11 /14/84 7.48 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 490 -49 324508 28.35 ST_ PAUL GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4_504- 510 -51 324508 - _11/06/84 11/06/84 _ 19.66- _BOOK ST PAUL BOOK CREDIT 10- 4504- 510 -51 324568 11/14/84 10009 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 3245 ,j 8 11/08/84 175.39 _ + ST_ PAUL _BOOK -LAUNDRY 10- 4504 - 510-51 324508 11/13/84 50.48- ST PAUL BOOK _ CREDIT - 10 -4516- 180 -18 y 324568 11/06/84 6.06 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 180 -18 324568 11/06/84 9.60 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 - - -- 223.97 - affatf fff -CKS Y OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11- 19 -As AGE 17 91984 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV* S P.O. # MESSAGE 324512 11/13/84 66.12 S T ROBE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 66.12 r _ -_ -- - -- --- -- - - - - -- - ------ - - - -- - - -- -- -- arartr +•+ -CKS i. 324514 11/C8/84 85.00 SOUTHWEST CLINIC PHY EXAM 10- 4246 - 560 -56 85.00 rrarr r *** -CKS 324525 11 /C6 /E4 278.75 3 M CO - SIGNS B POSTS - 10 -4542- 325 -30 278.75 * 324526 11/06/84 1.450.70 TRACY OIL GASOLINE -- 10- 4612 - 560 -56 19450.70 * * ** -CKS 324531 11/13/84 185.10 THE AMMONIA HOUSE IN CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 707 -70 1 85 .1 0 * - - - - -- - - :2**4:*37 •*r -CKS 11/06/84 474.00 TRI STATE DRILLING REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 783 -78 474.00 •arr.a •f• -CKS 324541 11/16/84 187.60 TARGET - AMMUNITION 29- 4572- 720 -72 187.60 * 324542 11/13/E4 99174.26 THORPE DIST - INVENTORY- -- - - - -- 50 -4630- 862 -86 -- - - 99174.26 * *** -CKS 324548 11/08/84 310.95 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600 - 610 -61 310.95 rrr*r: *** -CKS 32455U 11/13/84 20.40 TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 20.40 * 324551 11/14/84 504.45 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 420 -42 324551 11/14/84 19258.00 UNTFOP.MS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOY 10- 4266- 421 -42 324551 11/14/94 336925 - _ UNIFORMS UNLIMITED _ UNIFORM - 324551 11/14/E4 21 *00 UNIFJRMS UNLIMITED GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 324551 11/14/84 16.50 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 421 -42 324551 11/14/E4 197.00 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED - _ GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504- 460 -46 324551 11/14/84 37.70 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510- 440 -44 29371.10 rr*r*r + ++-CKS 324586 11/13/84 324586 11/13/84 _324.591 11/14/84 .r 297.43 * +*-CKS 25.56 W WGRAING_ER - REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 330 -30 25.56- -W W _ 6RAINGER CREDIT 10- 4540- 330 -30 __ - .00 ** -CKS a 45908 _ CECELIA SMITH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 140 -14 ` 198 -4 CITY OF EOINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 18 CHECK NO* VENDOR - - - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. t P.O. # MESSAGE J 324553 11/13/84 87.02_ UNITED IC. CORP__ SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 � _ 324553 __ 11/13184 -- _ _ _ - - 56.84 _ _ELECTR UNITED ELECTRIC CORP _GEN REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 322 -30 ____________ 324553 11/13/84 88.37 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 324553 441.96 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -_52 324553 11/13/84! 39005 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 20- 4540- 646 -64 324553 11/13/84 28200 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 788 -78 U4553 _ 11/13/84 87.02 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP_ GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 788 -78 324553 _ 11/13/84 _ _ ___ _ 87.02- - UNITEO- ELECTRIC CORP — CORRECTION 30- 4504 - 788 -78 19346.84 * * ** -CKS J 324569 11/13/84 275.62 VALLEY IND PROPANE GASOLINE - 28 -4612- 707 -70 275.62 * - -- - - -- - - ffiff• CKS 324571 11/13/84 21.50- A 6 A BATTERY CREDIT 10 -4540- 560 -56 \ 324571 11/13/84 128.70 A 4 BATTERY 10- 4540 - 560 -56___ 324571 11/13/84 _ 77.50 _ _6 A 8 4 BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 184.70 •t :. • * +* -CKS ✓ 324573 11/13/84 _ _ _ VOSS ELECTRIC GEN 10- 4504 - 440 -44 324573 11/13/84 _790.56__ _ _ 44964 — VOSS- ELECTRIC _ _SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 235.20 + f *! -CKS ✓ 324575 _ 11/13/84 _ _ 322.62 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR 30 -4540- 783 -78_ 324575 11/13/84 111.60 WATER PRODUCTS -PARTS REPAIR PARTS 30 -4540- 783 -78 — 324575 11/06/84 130.00 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 783 -78 a 324575 - -� - 11/06/84 282.20 ,WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 30 -W540- 783 -78 - - 846.42 + f f i i i i * +* -CKS 324578 11/13/84 7.87 WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 7.87 + 324579 11/13/84 63.26 WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 450 4- 301-30 324579 11/13/84__ __ 15.43 WILLIAMS_ STEEL -HDWE WELDING SUPPLIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 324579 11/13/84 218.74 WILLIAMS STEEL -HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 783 -78 324586 11/13/84 324586 11/13/84 _324.591 11/14/84 .r 297.43 * +*-CKS 25.56 W WGRAING_ER - REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 330 -30 25.56- -W W _ 6RAINGER CREDIT 10- 4540- 330 -30 __ - .00 ** -CKS a 45908 _ CECELIA SMITH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 140 -14 r 1984 Y OF EDINA CHECK JISTER 11- 1910PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 45.08 ---- - - - -- - - -* • +_CKS -- ------- ---- - - - 324593. 11/13/84 20.14 MINNESOTA CLAY INVENTORY SUPPLIES 23- 1209- 000 -00 2004 * -- - - -- - -- - -------- ..__ - -- f* f f f 4 • *• -CKS 324619 11/08/84 27.71 EGEBERG CYCLE REPAIR PARATS 27 -4540- 671 -66 27.71 f* **! f * ++ -CKS 324762 11/06184 82.20 JOF+N KEILLOGG REFUND MATER! - - 30- 3525- 000 -00 - -- 82.20 3247.3 11/06/84 91. ^D PINE CONE NURSERY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 91.00 * 3247 i:4 11/06/84 381.' -9 ACTION MAILING SERV CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 500 -50 381.19 * 3247C.5 11 /C6 /84 50.35 DAVE STEVENSON REIMBURSEMENT '- 26 -4504- 688 -68 50.35 * 3247::6 11/06/84 281.48 N9RMAN EQUIP CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 281.48 * 3247u.7 11/E6/84 95.20 CONNNEY- SAFETY PROD GEN SUPPLIES! 20 -6504- 646 -64 - - -- - 95.20 * 324708 11/06/84 124.00 AGNES MC :RORY AMBULANCE 'REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 124.00 * 3e473 11/06/84 147.20 CORY F000 SERV' - _CONCESSIONS ___'___28- 46 24;;704- 70 147.20 * 324710 11/06/84 62.10 ED LANGELLO - MILEAGE' - - - 10- 4208 - 390 -30 62.10 * 324711 11/06/84 - -- - 1X069.20 - -- _L c E _CT - --- ^ - - - -- ION SUPPLY -s - OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 180 -1$ - -------- - - - -_- 19069.20 * 1 324712 11/06184 21.06 MAGNUSON SOD SOD B BLACK DIRT 20- 4562- 642 -64 q 324712 11/06/84 53.94 HAGNUSON SOD SOD & BLACK DIRT 30- 4562- 783 -78 75.00 * *fftf • +* -CKS 324715 11/08/84 1,360.00 TREE TRAN INC EQUIP RENTAL ^ - 27- 4226- 662 -66 19360.10 * 324716 11/08/84 60.00 DOYLE LOCK CO GEN SUPPLIES 10 -454- 421 -42 - - 60.00 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 20 _CHECK N09 _ DATE_ _ AMOUNT VENDOR T ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV._ # P.O.- 4 MESSAGE_. I� 324717 11/C8/84 - - v - -- 20.00 JOHN.PUDERGOIS AMMUNITION 10 -4572- 420 -42 324717 11/08/84 200.00 JOHN PODERGOIS - REPAIRS 10- 4572 - 420 -42-- - -'- -- - - - 220.00 - 324718 11/14/84 200.59 XEROX- EQUIP RENAL 10- 4226510 -51 324718 11/08/84 475.00 XEROX GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 675.59 324719 11/08/84 40.00 MN DEPT OF PUBLIC TELE TYPE SERV 10 -4268- 420 -42 40.00 • __ _ _ 324720 11/08/84 29853 *87 HENN CTY TREASURER ROOM 8 BOARD 10- 4286- 220 -22 29853.87 324721 11/08/84 137.45 OMNITRON GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4506- 460 -46 137.45 • 324722 11/08/84 185.00 CHRISTAIN BROTHERS TREE REMOVAL 60- 1300 - 002 -18 185.00 • 324723 11/08/84 30.00 MEETING 10 -4202- 420 -42 3D.30 324724 11/08/84 119000 SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ MEETING 10- 4202 - 422 -42 324725 11/08/84 119.DO DON ENGER MEETING 10- 4202 - 422 -42 119.00 324726 11/08/84 200.00 UNIVERSITY OF MEETING 10 -4202- 422 -42 200.00 324727 11 /C8 /84 13.25 STATE OF MN GUIDEBOOK 10- 4204 - 420 -42 - - - - - -- - - 13.25 - - --- -- - -- -- -- ' 324728 11/08/84 942.75 DEN CONSTANTINE INSTRUCTION 20 -2240- 000 -00 942.75 * 324729 11/08/84 200000 OGLEBAY TUITION 27- 4200 - 660 -66 200.00 * i 324730 11/08/84 136.62 E A SYEEN CO CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 324730 11/08/84 _ _ 136.62- E_A SYO_N CO CORRECTION 28 -4624- 707 -70 324730 11/08/84 136.62 - _ E A SYE]EN CO CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 707 -70 136.62 324731 11/08/84 19243073 LABOR RELATIONS CONT SERV 10 -4200- 140 -14 19243.73 , 326732 11/08/84 - 25D.53 -. FARYELL OZMUN KIRK GEN SUPPLIES - - - -- - - 20- 4504 - 662 -64 250.53 324733 - 11/08/84 187.93 PHYSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44 324733 11/08/84 372 *63 PHYSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510- 440 -44 1984 Y OF EDINA r CHECK NO. DATE 34734 324 735 324735 324735 324736 324 737 324738 324739 324741 324742 324743 324 74 4 324745 324746 324747 324747 324 748 324749 324759 11/ ^E /E4 11 /GA /E4 11/0/84 11/08/84 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/E4 11/13/E4 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/EA 11/13/E4 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/84 11/13/E4 11/13/E4 11/13/84 AMOUNT 560.56 249.20 249 CD * 57.90 50.00• 5.00 5.00 * 16.77 16.77 75.75 75.75 • 78.19 78.19 E?.20 88.2D CHECK � JI'TrR 11 -19 -� PAGE 21 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. P P.O. A MESSAGE OZALIO CORP FRESH WATER SFOCITY FRESH WATER SFOCITY FR^SH WATER SFOC!TY MIX TANSFER HOLMSTE'N ICE RINKS VILTER MA:4UF CORP NATIONAL FIRE 973.44 NISSAN 973.44 * 30- 4540 - •7.33 -78 645.20 NECO 645.20 * 10 -4610- 560 -56 92.CO MANHATTIAN METERS 92.20 * 30- 4540 - 783 -78 20.41 PARSDNS E LECTRIC 20.41 * 10- 4542 - 325 -30 125.80 CONV_YORS 125.80 * 10- -4248- 560 -56 11.92 GARDNER' HARDWARE 11.02 259.65 DECKER SUPLY 137.25 DECKER SUPLY 396.90 89.96 MIDWEST DIES:L SERVL 89.96 1750 AUTO SOUND 17.50 + 50 L2 BLUE PRINTING MEETING CORF,_CTI CN CONFERENCE GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES CONT REPAIRS TRAINING AIDS 1.0-4570-260-26 10- 4204- 480 -48 10- 4274- 480 -48 10 -4204- 480 -48 28- 4504- 708 -70 28 -4 5 04- 70 8- 70 28- 4248- 707 -70 10 -4 650- 440- 44 OUTLAY OUTLAY 20 -4900- 600 -60 REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - •7.33 -78 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 30- 4546- 788 -78 WELDING SUPPLIES 10 -4610- 560 -56 PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4540 - 783 -78 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 328 -30 SIGNS B POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 CONT REPAIRS 10- -4248- 560 -56 * * * -CKS HALL COMP PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 J 324751 11/13/A4 13.68 AMERICAN TRAILER REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 A � y, 1984 CITY OF EDIN,4 CHECK REGISTER 11 -19 -84 PAGE 22 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT V=NDO'� ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. u MESSAGE 374751 11/13/84 61.92 AMERICAN TRAIL -R REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 344751 11/1'/84 61.92 A" RICAN TRAILER PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 137.52 r 324752 11/13/84 71.69 WEST 'W?LD PARTAS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 71.69 + _... .... 324753 11/13/P4 158.)7 NELSON RADIC COMM CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 SC4753 11/13/84 132.00 NELSON RADIC COMM CON REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 3 O'] - 0 + 324754 11/13/84 7.P0 O-KO FACTORY SE RV PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 324754 11/13/84 17.65 DTKO FACTORY S---RV PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 25.45 + 324755 11/13/8.4 23.70 STANLEY W TULL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 2R.70 + 324756 11/13/84 101.120 STREET AMET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 330 -30 101.00 ` 324757 11/13/84 27.80 J H LARSON REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 27.?O 324758 11/13/84 ?76. %0 DAY DIST INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 206.29 + 324759 11/13/84 55 .3 7 _LECTR!C MOTOR REPAIR PARTS 30- 4540 - 782 -78 55.37 r 3e 4760 11/13/F4 15.12 MINVALCO INC REPAIR PARTAS 20- 4540 - 646 -64 32 476 0 11/13/34 73.54 MIT NVALGO !NC REPAIP. PARTAS 30- 4540- 782 -78 93.72 + •r• +r+ + +• -CKS 32475{,1 11/13/34 207.18 300.68 VINCENT METALS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 32475 61 11/13/E4 93.53 VICENTS METALS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 344762 11 /13/8 4 35.00 335 .72 NCE REPAIR PARTS 47 -4540- 801 -80 324763 11/13/84 200. 2 ROBERT SOBCOVIAK CLEANING ART --NT 23 -4200- 610 -61 200. ?9 + 324764 11/13/84 105..17 JANEY WESTIN CALLIGRAPHY 23 -4200- 610 -61 105.00 324765 11/13/84 150.07 ROBERT LCOISIANA FIREARM INSTRUCTION 20- 2240 - 000 -00 324766 11 /13/8 4 272.00 MN STATE TREASURE CERT FIREARM SAFETY 2^- 2240 - 000 -OC 272.30 + 324767 11/13/84 5 ^.07 JOHN KEPRIOS FIREARM INST 20- 2240 - 000 -00 .,.,I. � .,., ��V �yir. f�n �141G}�•`'F�flr ;4ti.'�;��i, ai, ti+'tit',JI'E.i75Y.lekv. .., ... It f OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 11 -19- AGE 23 11984 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 9 P.O. # MESSAGE 324768 11/13/84 4,508.50 DAVEY TREE EXPERTS CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 010 -18 - - -- 4,508.50 *- - -- - -- - - - - 324769 11/13/84 70.00 LEROY L'ISK CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 440 -44 i!'Q Po C 324770 11/13/E4 47.25 MIT2 BERNARD CLASS REFUND 23- 3500 - 000 -00 324770 11/13/84 _ _ 4.00- _ MITZ BERNARD- CLERICAL CHARGE — - 23 -380- 000 -00 43.25 * m 324771 11/131E4 CYD WICKER - INST ART CENTER 23 -4100- 61461 24.00 * t 324772 11/13/E4 70.62 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 324772 11/13/84 4.10 NAOMI JOHNSON CLASS SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 616 -61 e 74.72 324773 11/14/84 80.00 WAHL 8 WAHL SERVICE CONTRACTS 10- 4288- 140 -14 q 80.00 324774 11/13/E4 23.69 EDWARD LANCELLO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 e 23.69 . A 324775 11/13/84 79028 SCOTSMAN MIDWEST CONT REPARS 28 -4248- 704 -70 e 79.28 • 324776 11/13/84 69519.44 HENN CT.Y TREASURER CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 353 -30 e 6.519.44 324777 11/13/84 195.00 ISIA GEN SUPPLIES 28 -4504- 708 -70 e 195.00 324778 11/13181 200000 RICHARDSON SERV CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 707 -70 e 200.00 324779 11/13/84 42.93 MARK BERNHARDSON DINNERS 10 -4206- 140 -14 e 42.93 .. ... :.. :.. -CKS e 324781 11/14/E4 -- - 8.40 DAVE YELL - 23- 3625 - 000 -00 ART AORK SOLD 8.40 324782 11/14/84 - 46.20 J LOIS WILLIS .— — — ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 46.20 * e 324783 11/14/84 4200 KAY "SCHL05SER 233625-000 -00 ART WORK SOLO 42.00 * e 324784 11/14/84 16.80 PAULA PFAFF ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 V - 16.80 • a 324785 11/14/E4 - 42:00 BETTY REODY ART YORK SO L'0 2 3---3-6-75---0 00 -b 0 42.00 * e d 1984 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NOo DATE 324786 11/14/E4 32 478 7 J 324788 11/14/84 CHECK REGISTER 11-19-84 PAGE 24 ----AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV.-! P.O. #-MESSAGE jf 12.95 HARDY MC9j;iSQN 12.95 ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 10.50 OBERON LESLIE ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 10.50 -- 11/14/84 11920 SMELLY ITMAN ART WORK SOLD .23-3625-000- 00 11.20 324789 — 11/14/84 __18020 MARGE HEEGAARD ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 18' 324790 11/14/84 2.45 KAREN HANSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 2.45 324791 11/14/84 5.25 BARBARA HANSON ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 324792 11/14/84 10o50 JE AN HAEFELE ART WORK SCLO 23- 3625 - 000 -00 10.50 ---9.62-'': PAf,G'RIIER ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 9.6z 324794 11/14/24 31.50. ___L.D_ICK_AREEN ------- ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625-000-00 31.50 324795 11/14/E4 MOO JO FRENCH ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 28.00 324796 11/14/E4 ---17.50 SUSAN FRAME ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 17.50 __324f97___._11/14/84 5.95 MAUREEN BROCKWAY ART WORK SOLD 23-3625-000-00 5. 9 5 324798 2. 60 - -12.60 -* PAN BONZELET ART WORK SCLD 23-3625-000-00 324799 11/14/84 3.64 JOHN ACOSTA ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 3. 6 4-*— 324800 11/14/84 20eD0 BETTY HOOD ANDERSON INSTRUCTION ART CTR 23- 4100- 614 -61 20.00 324801 11#114/84 216.00 KRIS OSTEN INSTRUCTION ART CTR 23-4100-614-61 324802 11/14/84 308900 PHYL HAYWk INSTRUCTION ART CTR 23-4100-614-61 308.00 * 324 80 3-,---- -11 /14/E4 ----288*00 JIM PROHL INSTRUCTION ART CTR 23-4100-614-61 2887.00F * 324804 11/14/84 240o00 CYD WICKER INSTRUCTION ART CTR 23-4100-614-61 ' n ibv9m4 r or cozxA c*Ec^ zo7cn 11~19~. /xsc 25 + ' ~ mmccK NO. DATE _ 9MpuNT _ _ VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION xcco p° . ' -----'----e74.3 �� uo ° ^ , /`' 4 |`| 324805 11/14x84 0 -----uunv-Izcos -�' ~ �r�°oo ° |. � szumo* 11 ? 14 /x4 --*0V-.8 '^1 -Ut-T-f0_N_ ~ *08°00 '.� seou,v 11/14/24 140.00 wxvmc HOWELL -----------�mttku _614 -'_61----------- � ��o oo . ° so*aLm 11 /14/84 20.00 ------olLL--ozcT_R_IC*n_6m-----'---tw � -3- , van°oo � .''. oz*muv 11v1*x8* 256°00 '_--__ xELcm - Zxe�i�-----------�waT�w ' ~ zna°oo 3u4810 11m*ve4-- ooVzoiFizcrn---------�---- INS TnUMtIN-0f-CrR-----23___C180W61_4- --'� ~ 192°00 oz*mnv 11x14/84 576.00 - uo FRENCH-- - - '---- -- -xnT't TR---- 23~41 00-614~61'------------'-'- -- � 576°00 ' 3e4812 ' 11m*19*— --------758.00--'---__nx7xf-GUSrxpwo 'mDcti 1 ` , �sn°no ° 324813 11/14v84 - v 92*4.25 - - mxx omxnnsn ---------- mufmuCf TON ART -cTm-----23-*1 DO- uv*~a1--------------'------ � 1 9244°25 3a4u14- v1/14v84-_- _-___--- 240.00 , z*o.00 ° ~ 324815 11m*/84---------- 864.10 '----'w USA x-pnxnc----------'--ImnrlRucr_l_hN_A_R_T,C_T' R_----2_3-_a4_l___0U;;_614-4l_ -' - � na*°nq oa^m,* 11 /x^xm* ----------nn.nn--------nxnsx�ntf-�u��------- , 80°00 ° '« 3u4817 I1/14ve*--------'� 130°00 ---'Xm noczcrr-pF'-CpAo------tmptREmt 0--4 20 2~16 ------- - � 130°00 ° � ` °°°~Cno 32481 9- 11/14x8* _ 32.70 Tez mrxrc mco zmxcm7mxr 50~4632~823~82 32*819 11/14ve4 2133°40 TnI oTxrc-ecu---------- INVENTORY 50~4632___862~86--------'----------'-- � 316°10 ° w 324820 11/14/84 24 00-------JoSEp_fi0mC-6ifA ��-U0U�� - -- - - * I �^°uo ° 324821 11/14x84 -' - - ---124°30 '--- pmAmnLmm_Gaxv ----- --x*euLxmcE-nifiFUm6_-------10-3f�6-;006~06_---------------- -- a 124.00 ~ ^ ~/ * - s2*8e2 -----11/14ve ,5r5-°bb-------- � � 29575°00 � � 1984 CITY _ _CHECK N0. OF EDINA _DATE -__ —_ , AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOd DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. 11 -19 -84 PAGE 26 i_ 0 P.O. A MESSAGE _ - -T —ITEM ,-- _ 324823 _ _ 11/14/84 INTER INSTITUE OF DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10-4204-140-14 55.00 -`- + - - - -- - 324824 -- - 11/14/84 - -- 36,952.33 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 361,952.33 • i 324825 _ - - _ 11/14/84 - - — 79957.17 - - — MIDWEST PAVING 8 - - PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00_ -- 79957.17 ■- - - -- _324826 _ - - _11/14/84 - - 163.39 ORS CORP PAYENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 I ' 163:39 324827 _ _11/1.4/84 _ 89192.33 _ - -- 4EST_�M PATMENT_ 60- 2040- 000 -00 89192.33 ■ 324828 _11/14/E4- - - - -- 116.67 WM 8 FEICK CONF 8 SCHOOLS 10- 4202 - 440 -44 116.67 --- - -- -- 324829 _ 11/14/84 - 39374.22 STRGAR ROSCOE PRO SERV ENG_ 10- 4220 - 260 -26 324829 11/14/84 29231.68 _INC_ STRGAR ROSCOE INC CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 002 -12 5,605.90 + fit` - 11/14/84 THE ENR'AGROU324830 INC OFFICE EQUIP 10- 4906 -50 050 59610.00 324831 - - -- 11/14/84 — - 222.80 - -__i GA MET IME--- _.- ____ - - -- REPAIR PARTS 20- 4540 - 646 -64 - -- - - - - - -- - 222.80 ■ 324832 11/14-/84-- 69434.53 FALLS 8i NYHUSMOEN CONSTRUCTION 26-1300-000-00 69434.53 ■ 324833 11/14/84 12.50 STATE OF MINNESOTA BOOKS 10- 4502- 140 -14 12.50 ■ 324834 11/14/f4T 33.95 LEU ABRAHAM MILEAGE 30 -4208- 787 -78 33.95 + 324835 11/14/84 - - - 210.00 QUALITY -FAB INC OFFICE SUFPLIES 1Q- 4516 - 510 -51 - - - -- - 210.00 + 324836 11%14/84 34.29 RETAIL OATA_- SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 34.29 • 324837 11/14/84 i 25 237. BECKIE ROGERS SERVICES 104120- 180 -18 237.25 • 324838 - 11/14/f4 5_36T,j6 — EOINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS BUS RENTAL 20- 4282 - 625 -62 - ^i l 59367.06 + 1559781.50 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - 21 ,560.74 FU4D 20 TOTAL_ PARK FUND "! 89838.65 FFUND-23-TOTAL AR'T CENTER - -- 69801.75 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND �" r .% P OF EDINA CMECK&STER 11 -19 -GAGE 27 `1984 CHECK_ N0. DATE- __- - - -. -. -___- AMOUNT VENDOR. -- . - _ -._ - -- - -,_ -ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P.O. 9 MESSAGE__ —__ 59460.17 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 89041.60 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND -- -- -- - - - - -� __ 466.52 FUND--29—TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND J 22 ' 239.96 39998.95 FUND FUND 30 40 TOTAL TOTAL WATERWORK FUND SEWER RENTAL FUND fi - - -- -- — 959901.19 FUND 50 TOTAL LI9UOR DISPENSARY FUND 61,570.40 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 4 9.433* FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION 02 3949094.52 TOTAL �; 1 1 Handtyped checks Vs 59635 thru 59640 -- 59649 —thru -59661 � - - --— -- Computer checks Ps 60057 thru 60324 1 V.. 1 d APF„G -r, i '. F;%YMENT. 1 / a► it