HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-03-24 Meeting PacketAgenda
Transportation Commission
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Public Works Facility - Multi-Purpose Room
Thursday, March 24, 2022
6:00 PM
I.Call To Order
II.Roll Call
III.Approval Of Meeting Agenda
IV.Approval Of Meeting Minutes
A.Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February 17, 2022
V.Special Recognitions And Presentations
A.2021 Tra&c Safety Summary Report
B.2021 PACS Fund Summary Report
VI.Community Comment
During "Community Comment," the Board/Commission will invite residents to share relevant issues
or concerns. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Chair may limit the
number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items
that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment.
Individuals should not expect the Chair or Board/Commission Members to respond to their
comments tonight. Instead, the Board/Commission might refer the matter to sta% for
consideration at a future meeting.
VII.Reports/Recommendations
A.Tra&c Safety Report of March 1, 2022
B.2022 Work Plan Updates
VIII.Chair And Member Comments
IX.Sta/ Comments
X.Adjournment
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public
process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing ampli3cation, an
interpreter, large-print documents or something else, please call 952-927-8861
72 hours in advance of the meeting.
Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: IV.A.
To:Transportation Commission Item Type:
Minutes
From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner
Item Activity:
Subject:Approval of Minutes - Regular Meeting of February
17, 2022
Action
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Approve the minutes of the Transportation Commission regular meeting of February 17, 2022.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached draft minutes.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Draft Minutes: Feb. 17, 2022
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
Minutes
City Of Edina, Minnesota
Transportation Commission
Webex
February 17, 2022
I. Call To Order
Chair Johnson called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
II. Roll Call
Answering roll call: Commissioners Ahler, Brown, Kitui, Lewis, Plumb-Smith, Richman, Clark, Johnson
Late: Commissioner Kanti Mahanty
Absent: Commissioners Kane, McCarthy
Staff present: Transportation Planner Andrew Scipioni
III. Approval Of Meeting Agenda
Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner Plumb-Smith to
approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried.
IV. Approval Of Meeting Minutes
Motion was made by Commissioner Plumb-Smith and seconded by Commissioner Brown to
approve the January 20, 2022 meeting minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried.
V. Special Recognition and Presentations
A. Micromobility Education, Part 1
Liaison Scipioni provided a brief presentation of the City’s experience with micromobility services
between 2018 and 2020.
Commissioner Kanti Mahanty arrived at 6:29.
VI. Reports/Recommendations
A. Traffic Safety Report of January 25, 2022
The Commission reviewed and commented on the Traffic Safety Report of January 25, 2022.
B. 2022 Work Plan Updates
#1 Tree Boulevard Policy – Met with City Forester, planning to talk to other Commissions
about their thoughts.
#2 Public Transit Checklist – Met with Metro Transit staff; service levels are expected to
decrease due to driver shortage and ridership decline. Next step is to take information and start
formalizing checklist.
#3 PACS Fund Policy – Scheduling meeting with staff to discuss next steps.
#4 SRTS Demonstration Projects – No update.
#5 TIS Process Review – No update.
Draft Minutes☒
Approved Minutes☐
Approved Date:
#6 Transit Connectivity – This initiative will follow the lead of Initiative #2.
C. Annual Elections
Commissioner Plumb-Smith nominated Commissioner Lewis as Vice Chair. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Richman. All voted aye. Motion carried.
Commissioner Richman nominated Commissioner Johnson as Chair. Motion was seconded
by Commissioner Plumb-Smith. All voted aye. Motion carried.
VII. Chair and Member Comments – Received.
VIII. Staff Comments – Received.
IX. Adjournment
Motion was made by Commissioner Richman and seconded by Commissioner Plumb-Smith to
adjourn the February 17, 2022 meeting at 7:31 p.m. All voted aye. Motion carried.
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE
J F M A M J J A S O N D # of Mtgs Attendance %
Meetings 1 1 2
NAME
Ahler, Mindy 1 1 2 100%
Brown, Chris 1 1 2 100%
Johnson, Kirk 1 1 2 100%
Kane, Bocar 0 0%
Kitui, Janet 1 1 50%
Lewis, Andy 1 1 2 100%
McCarthy, Bruce 1 1 50%
Plumb-Smith, Jill 1 1 2 100%
Richman, Lori 1 1 2 100%
Clark, Anna (s) 1 1 50%
Kanti Mahanty, Stephen (s) 1 1 50%
Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.A.
To:Transportation Commission Item Type:
Report and Recommendation
From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report Discussion, Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and comment on the 2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached staff report. Commission comments will be included in the staff report presented to City Council at
their April 5 regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report
March 24, 2022
Transportation Commission
Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
2021 Traffic Safety Summary Report
Information / Background:
The Engineering Department received 180 traffic safety requests in 2021. Requests are received by phone,
mail, email and through the City’s website. 165 requests were reviewed and completed in 2021, an increase
of seven requests from 2020; this includes 15 requests received before 2021. Each request may require data
collection and analysis by the Traffic Safety Coordinator prior to review by the Traffic Safety Committee.
Requests are assigned to one of five categories; Traffic Calming, Parking and Signage, Intersection Control,
Pedestrian Safety or Other (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. Traffic Safety Requests Reviewed in 2021
After requests are reviewed by the Committee, they are categorized as A (recommended approval), B
(recommended denial/no change) or C (recommend further study) items in traffic safety reports. Many
requests are handled solely by the Traffic Safety Coordinator; these are generally requests for increased
police enforcement or for matters governed by existing City policies (crosswalks, signage, traffic signals,
etc.). These are categorized as D items. Table 1 shows the full breakdown of requests reviewed in 2021.
19%
25%
23%
20%
13%
Traffic Calming
Parking & Signage
Intersection Control
Pedestrian Safety
Other
STAFF REPORT Page 2
Table 1. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Type
In total, the Committee recommended approval of 18 requests (A items) and denial of 14 (B items). 133
requests were handled by the Traffic Safety Coordinator (D items). Parking and Signage along with
Pedestrian Safety received the highest number of approvals (7), followed by Traffic Calming and Intersection
Control (2).
Figure 2 shows the 2021 traffic safety requests by month received. There was a significant increase in
requests in April, likely a result of improving weather and traffic volumes returning to pre-pandemic levels.
Figure 2. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Month Received
Request Type Traffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other
Items Reviewed 32 (19%) 41 (25%) 38 (23%) 33 (20%) 21 (13%)
Recommendation A B D A B D A B D A B D A B D
2 2 28 7 9 25 2 2 34 7 1 25 0 0 21
% 6% 6% 88% 17% 22% 61% 5% 5% 89% 21% 3% 76% 0% 0% 100%
0
5
10
15
20
25
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec# of RequestsTraffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection Control Pedestrian Safety Other
STAFF REPORT Page 3
Figures 3 and 4 demonstrate trends from 2018 to 2021. Figure 3 shows the number of requests received by
month, which illustrates most requests are received in the spring and summer months and taper off in the
fall and winter.
Figure 3. Traffic Safety Requests Received by Month (2018 – 2021)
Figure 4 shows requests submitted by category. Intersection Control and Traffic Calming requests have
increased in recent years. In 2021, Parking & Signage and Pedestrian Safety have remained at consistent
levels.
Figure 4. Traffic Safety Requests Received by Category (2018 – 2021)
Each request is geolocated so staff can monitor trends and track multiple requests made at the same
locations. Table 2 shows the number of requests received from each quadrant of the City and the most
requested category. Figures 5 – 8 show the locations of each traffic safety request by quadrant.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
2018 2019 2020 2021
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Traffic Calming Parking & Signage Intersection
Control
Pedestrian Safety Other
2018 2019 2020 2021
STAFF REPORT Page 4
Table 2. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests by Quadrant
Quadrant Requests Received % of Total Requests
Received Most Requested Category
Northwest 49 27% Pedestrian Safety (13)
Southwest 32 18% Parking and Signage and
Pedestrian Safety (9)
Northeast 73 41% Parking & Signage (29)
Southeast 26 14% Intersection Control (11)
Figure 5. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Northwest Edina
STAFF REPORT Page 5
Figure 6. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Southwest Edina
STAFF REPORT Page 6
Figure 7. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Southeast Edina
STAFF REPORT Page 7
Figure 8. 2021 Traffic Safety Requests Received in Northeast Edina
Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: V.B.
To:Transportation Commission Item Type:
Report and Recommendation
From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner
Item Activity:
Subject:2021 PACS Fund Summary Report Discussion, Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and comment on the 2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached staff report and supporting material. Commission comments will be included in the report presented
to City Council at their April 5 regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
2021 PACS Fund Report
2021 PACS Fund Projects Map
2021 PACS Fund Summary Table
March 24, 2022
Transportation Commission
Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner
2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety (PACS) Fund Summary Report
Information / Background:
The PACS Funds available in 2021 were $1,361,499. This includes $132,113 in rollover funds from 2020.
Approximately $523,549 is estimated to roll over into the current PACS Fund (2022). $837,950 (62%) of
available funds were spent on PACS-related projects and items in 2021 (a decrease of approximately
$843,675 or 50% from 2020). About 1.6 miles of new pedestrian and bicycle facilities were installed in 2021
using the PACS Fund (1.5 less than 2020). Table 1 shows a breakdown of all related expenditures in 2021.
Details project costs and locations are shown in the attached summary table and project map.
Table 1: 2021 PACS Fund Expenditures
While most of the costs shown are actual construction costs, some are estimated based on pending final
payments to contractors. Additionally, as of the time of this memorandum, the fourth quarter 2021 utility
franchise fees have yet to be received and are estimated for this report.
Attached:
2021 PACS Fund Summary Table
2021 PACS Fund Projects Map
PACS Project Type Cost Total Percentage
New Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities $ 587,757 70.1%
Maintain Existing Pedestrian & Bicycle Facilities $ 15,254 1.8%
Citywide Speed Limit Reduction $ 13,169 1.6%
Final Payments for Previous Projects $ 53,819 6.5%
Total Construction: $ 669,999 80.0%
Professional Services $ 51,917 6.2%
Other (maintenance, supplies, etc.) $ 7,860 0.9%
Transportation Planner Salary and Benefits $ 108,174 12.9%
Total Administrative: $ 167,951 20.0%
Total 2021 PACS Expenditures: $ 837,950 100.0%
¹»
¹»
¹»
¹º¹º
¹º
ñ
ñ
ñ
¹»
¹º
¹º
¹º
¹º
¹º
ñ
¹º
ñ
ñ
ñTRACY AVEVERNO N AVEWOODDALE AVEHANSEN RD70TH ST W
FRANCE AVE SVALLEYVIEWRDMINNESOT A D RGLEASONRDEdinaCommunityCenter
AvailAcademy
GoldenYears
Montessori
City
Hall
St Peter's Lutheran
Church & School
South ViewMiddle School
NormandaleElementary
ConcordSchool
CorneliaSchool
Southdale
Library
FireStation
Public Works &Park Maintenance
Creek ValleySchool
FireStation
Valley ViewMiddle School
EdinaHighSchool
CountrysideSchool
HighlandsSchool
EdinaCommunityLibrary
Our Lady ofGrace Church
& School
M in nehahaCreek
NineMileCreek
Nin eMileCreek
SouthdaleCenter
Canadian Pacific RailroadCanadian Pacific RailroadBLAKE RDSCHAEFER RDV ERN O N A VECAHILL RD66TH ST W
YORK AVE SINTERLACHEN BLVD
MALONEY AVE
4 4TH S T W
50TH ST W
54TH ST W
58TH ST W
70TH ST W
76TH ST W
DEWEY HILL RD
VALLEY VIEW RD
VALLEY VIEW RD
78TH ST W
I-494 HWY 100HWY 169HWY 169HWY 100HWY 62
HWY 62
March 2022
City of Edina
2021 PACS Fund Projects
±
0 2,000
Feet
A
BC
D
E
*Franchise Fees = 1,229,386.34$ Intergovernmental (Grants) =‐$ Other =‐$ 2020 PACS Fund Rollover = 132,113.54$ 1,361,499.88$ Construction Street/Item LocationMap KeyApprox. LF of New FacilityNotes Cost% of ExpendituresPedestrian Hansen Rd, W 56th St sidewalks Vernon Ave to W 60th St, Hansen Rd to Normandale Rd A 5,065 Melody Lake A/B, Birchcrest C Roadway Reconstruction 401,322.76$ Pedestrian Beard Ave, Fuller St sidewalks W 54th St to Minnehaha Creek, France Ave to Drew Ave B 1,233 Creek Knoll A/B Roadway Reconstruction70,537.59$ Pedestrian/ BicycleHighlands Park shared‐use paths Ayrshire Blvd, Doncaster Way C 1,530 115,896.21$ Pedestrian/ BicycleGleason Rd shared‐use path Vernon Ave to Nine Mile Creek culvert D 560 Bituminous overlay 6,145.52$ Pedestrian SafetyLincoln Dr RRFB replacement 400' south of Londonderry Rd E‐Replacement flashers, signs, hardware 9,108.51$ Newman Signs, Inc.‐‐Sign panels, sign posts 12,326.10$ Shapco Printing, Inc.‐‐Drive 25 car coasters 706.38$ BJKK Development‐‐Drive 25 info cards 137.00$ Pedestrian/ BicycleFinal payments on 2020 projects‐‐53,819.04$ ProfessionalServicesMcCauley Trl shared‐use path Valley View Rd to Gleason Rd‐‐Engineering fees (WSB) 51,917.00$ 6.2%OtherInternal services (I.T., equipment maintenance)7,860.00$ 0.9%TransportationPlannerOne full‐time employee (direct and indirect labor costs)108,174.54$ 12.9%Total = 837,950.65$ 100.0%8,388 **Rollover to 2022 Budget = 523,549.23$ 80.0%**Based on estimated 4th quarter 2021 fees and estimated final construction costs* Includes estimated 4th quarter 2021 feesRevenue2021 Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety Fund Expenditures2021 PACS Budget =Pedestrian SafetyCitywide Speed Limit Reduction
Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.A.
To:Transportation Commission Item Type:
Report and Recommendation
From:Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Item Activity:
Subject:Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022 Discussion
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review and comment on the Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022.
INTRODUCTION:
See attached staff report.
Comments received by the Commission will be included in the staff report provided to City Council at their April
5 regular meeting.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022
March 24, 2022
Transportation Commission
Nick Bauler, Traffic Safety Coordinator
Traffic Safety Report of March 1, 2022
Information / Background:
The Traffic Safety Committee (TSC) review of traffic safety matters occurred on March 1. The Traffic Safety
Coordinator, Transportation Planner, Streets Public Service Worker, City Engineer, Public Works Director,
Police Sergeant and Assistant City Planner was in attendance for this meeting.
On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They were informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional
facts to present, they can submit correspondence to the Transportation Commission and/or to City Council
prior to the April 5 regular meeting.
Section B: Items on which the Traffic Safety Committee recommends no action
B1. Review sight line concerns for southbound traffic on Eastview Dr facing west on Benton Ave
A fence was installed at 5828 Eastview Dr in summer 2021.
Sight distance from Eastview Dr is approximately 170’; 155’ needed for 25 mph roadway.
2019 Benton Ave ADT is 3,500.
Benton Ave is uncontrolled at Eastview Dr, all-way stop control at Tingdale Ave.
No reported crashes at intersection in
past 10 years.
Eastview Dr was reconstructed in
2021.
Reported concerns include snow
storage at northwest corner of
intersection.
Staff recommends no action; sight distance
allows adequate stopping distance for both
directions of traffic on Benton Ave.
Southbound Tingdale Ave facing eastbound Benton Ave
STAFF REPORT Page 2
B2. Review turn count data at France Ave & 49th St, Maple Rd & 50th St
Separate complaints of increased traffic and speeds on 48th and 49th Streets.
48th St data from 2017 to 2021;
i. ADT decreased (532 to 404).
ii. 85%-speed was consistent (30.6 to
30.7 mph).
49th St data from 2014, 2018 (during Nolan
Mains construction) and 2021;
i. ADT: 424, 923 and 842, respectively
ii. 85%-speed: 31.1, 29.5 and 30.2 mph,
respectively.
One crash was reported on Maple Rd in
2017.
In 2021, 19% of traffic were large vehicles, up
from 17.9% in 2014.
Staff reviewed intersection turn counts to
analyze vehicle types;
i. France Ave & 49th St: 580 passenger
vehicles, 26 2-axel vans/trucks and 8
semis/buses.
ii. Maple Rd & 50th St: 1164 passenger vehicles, 44 2-axel vans/trucks and 18
semis/buses
Staff recommends no action given; observed speeds and volumes are within acceptable
ranges for Local Connector and Local streets.
Section D: Other traffic safety items handled
D1. Two residents had concerns with signal timing delays for traffic on W 58th St and Parklawn Ave at
France Ave, leading to drivers running red lights. Hennepin County reviewed these signals and updated the
cycles to function appropriately.
D2. A 10-mph speed limit was requested on Skyline Dr due to the high number of children in the
neighborhood. Given the context of this street, no changes are recommended from the current 25-mph
speed limit.
D3. A resident reported a missing speed limit sign entering the south side of the alley between Madison Ave
and Jefferson Ave. Upon a site visit, a sign was in place and no further action needed.
D4. A request was made for additional road salt to treat excess ice on Doncaster Way. Public Works was
reviewed and responded to the request.
D5. A crosswalk was requested over Gleason Rd at Gleason Ct. A video study observed 32 total crosses
with a peak of 8 at 11:30 am. No crosswalk warrants were met.
D6. A crosswalk was requested to connect the sidewalk on the west side of France Ave at W 62nd St. A
video study observed 71 crosses with a peak hour of 11. Due to W 62nd being stop controlled, crossing
warrants were not met. Staff will work with Metro Transit to determine appropriate crossing treatments at
this intersection as part of the future E line BRT project.
Maple Rd & 50th St (left) and
France Ave & 49th St (right)
STAFF REPORT Page 3
D7. A requester had questions about signal timing on France Ave at Highway 62. MnDOT contacted the
requestor and provided answers regarding signal timing priorities for optimal traffic flow.
D8. A resident had concerns about cut-thru traffic and safety for pedestrians on W 60th St between
Normandale Rd and Wooddale Ave. ADT and 85%-speed in 2021 was observed at 918 and 29.7 mph,
respectively, which are within the acceptable range for a Local Connector street. No action is
recommended; the resident was informed of a proposed sidewalk between Concord Ave and Pamela Park.
D9. A resident was concerned with drivers on France Ave between Highway 62 and W 54th St not stopping
for buses with stop arms engaged. EPD was contacted for enforcement along with Hennepin County to
review if physical improvements should be implemented.
D10. A resident had concerns of vehicle speeds on Hansen Rd following the 2021 street reconstruction
project. Vehicles monitored with a speed detector ranged from 25 to 30 mph. No action is warranted.
D11. A group home manager at 5313 W 56th St requested allowance for long-term street parking for their
staff. City Code doesn’t allow on-street parking longer than six hours. The manager was given options
including constructing a larger driveway or contacting City Council about changing on-street parking time
limit.
D12. A request was made to extend pavement markings for left turning vehicles on W 70th St turning north
into Highway 100/Normandale Rd. Dotted lines (or cat tracks) extend through the intersection to restrict
left-turning vehicles from merging within the intersection. No pavement markings exist between the
crosswalk and the ramp to allow vehicles to merge into their desired lanes. No changes are recommended.
Date: March 24, 2022 Agenda Item #: VII.B.
To:Transportation Commission Item Type:
Other
From:Andrew Scipioni, Transportation Planner
Item Activity:
Subject:2022 Work Plan Updates Information
CITY OF EDINA
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
www.edinamn.gov
ACTION REQUESTED:
None.
INTRODUCTION:
Commissioners will provide updates on the status of 2022 Work P lan initiatives (unless an item is elsewhere on
the current agenda). See attached work plan.
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
2022 Work Plan Progress Report
Approved by City Council December 7, 2021
Commission: Transportation Commission
2022 Annual Work Plan
Initiative # 1 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Boulevard Tree Policy
Research, develop and recommend a citywide boulevard tree policy
that addresses planting, protection, maintenance, removal and funding.
Deliverable
Policy for consideration by City Council
Lead
Lori Richman
Target
Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison, periodic support from City Forester and/or Community Development Director.
Jan: Looking for committee members to assist in developing the policy, reviewing other agencies’ policies.
Feb: Met with City Forester, planning to talk to other Commissions about their thoughts.
Initiative # 2 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Public Transit Checklist
Develop a transit checklist to review on the proposed development
projects. Planning Commission will review and comment
Deliverables
Report to City Council
Lead
Andy Lewis
Target
Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-3 hours per month from Staff Liaison; periodic support from Community Development Director.
Jan: Reached out to members of the Planning Commission and Met Council for updates on transit operations in the city in 2022.
Feb: Met with Metro Transit staff; service levels are expected to decrease due to driver shortage and ridership decline. Next step is to take information and start
formalizing checklist.
Approved by City Council December 7, 2021
Initiative # 3 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
PACS Fund Policy
Review and recommend changes to the Pedestrian and Cyclist Safety
Fund policy.
Deliverable
Report to City Council
Lead
Chris Brown
Target
Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-3 hours per month by Staff Liaison; periodic support from Finance and/or Administration
Jan: Would like to meet with staff to understand expenditures and buying power of the fund. Admin and Engineering are preparing a report on fund to bring to
Commission for review and comment.
Feb: Scheduling meeting with staff to discuss next steps.
Initiative # 4 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
SRTS Demonstration Projects
Study Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and report on potential Safe
Routes to School demonstration projects.
Deliverable
Report to staff
Lead
Bocar Kane
Target
Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison.
Jan: No update.
Feb: No update.
Initiative # 5 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☒ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☐ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
TIS Process Review
Study and report on other agencies' process for completed traffic
impact studies related to development/redevelopment projects.
Deliverable
Report to City Council
Lead
Bocar Kane
Target
Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month by Staff Liaison; periodic support from Director of Engineering and Community Development Director.
Jan: No update.
Feb: No update.
Approved by City Council December 7, 2021
Initiative #6 Initiative Type ☒ Project ☐ Ongoing / Annual ☐ Event
Council Charge ☐ 1 (Study & Report) ☐ 2 (Review & Comment) ☒ 3 (Review & Recommend) ☐ 4 (Review & Decide)
Transit Connectivity
Review the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Plan and
recommend changes to proposed facilities to improve
connectivity to public transit.
Deliverables
Report to City Council
Lead
Andy Lewis
Target Completion Date
Q4
Budget Required: No funds available.
Staff Support Required: 1-2 hours per month from Staff Liaison.
Jan: Committee will meet to discuss first steps.
Feb: This initiative will follow the lead of Initiative #2.
Parking Lot: (These items have been considered by the BC, but not proposed as part of this year’s work plan. If the BC decides they would like to
work on them in the current year, it would need to be approved by Council.)
Organized trash collection