HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-07-12_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
REGULAR MEETINGS
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JULY 12, 1982
7:00 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of June 7, 1982, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. Annual Disclosure Report
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of May 17, June -7, June 21, 1982, approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass Second R]ading or if Second Reading should be waived.
Lot Divisions, Flood Plain Permits, Plats, Appeals from ;Administrative or
Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decisions require action by Resolution.
3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Provide for Special Use Permits for Certain
Uses in Public Buildings in the R -1 District - First Reading (Continued
from 6/21/82)
B. Lot Division
1. Part of R.L.S. 1278 and Unplatted Property - Generally located in
the Southwest quadrant of W. 66th and T.H. 100 (LD -82 -5) (6/2/82)
(Continued from 6/21/82) (Request withdrawn)
C. Set Hearing Dates - 7/19/82
1. Zoning Change and Preliminary Plat Approval
a. Prime Development Corporation - R -1 Residential District to POD -1
Planned Office District - Z -81 -8 (6/30/82)
b. Prime Professional Center Addition - Generally located in the
Northeast quadrant of County Rd. 18 and W. 7th St. - S -81 -13
(6/30/82)
2. Marshall Everson - R -1 Residential District to PRD -3 and HPD
Planned Residential District and Heritage Preservation District -
Generally located in Southwest quadrant of W. 70th St. and Cahill
Road - Z -82 -4 (6/30/82)
3. Zamansky Addition - Generally located in the Southwest quadrant of
W. 66th St. and T.H. 100
D. Lot Division
1. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Cleveland's Subdivision, Parkside Replat
LD -82 -6 (6/30/82)
Edina City Council Agenda
July 12, 1982
Page Two
II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
III. AWARD OF BIDS AND QUOTES - Tabulations and recommendations by City Manager.
Action of Council by Motion.
A. Public Improvements - Contract Nos. 82 -4, 82 -5 and 82 -6
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Community Center Report (Continued from 6/21/82)
B. School Parking Lot
C. Golf Dome
D. Edina Country Club Area - Designation of Historic Places
E. Beer License - Ediner - 3669 W. 69th St. (Galleria)
F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
V. ORDINANCES First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favor-
able rollcall vote to pass .Second Rdading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote if
Second Reading should be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 436 -A1 - Floor Drains in Restrooms
VI. FINANCE
A. Liquor Report as of 2/28/82
B. Claims Paid - Motion of seconded by for payment
of the following Claims as per Pre -List dated July 12, 1982: General
Fund, $151,170.08; Park Fund, $55,645.01; Art Center, $5,998.17; Swim-
ming Pool, $7,155.80; Golf Course, $23,343.15; Arena, $4,467.72; Gun
$1,963.70; Water, $6,398.97; Sewer, $151,667.08; Liquor, $2,585.77;
Construction, $6,280.09; Total, $416,675.54; and for confirmation of pay-
ment of the following claims: General Fund, $138,081.36; Park Fund,
$511.10; Art Center, $562.87; Swimming Pool, $692.04; Golf Course,
$10,885.13; Arena Fund, $4,542.96; Gun Range, $388.67; Water Fund,
$16,839.57; Sewer Fund, $4,809.61; Liquor Fund, $207,555.35; Total,
384,868.66
N
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1982
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian;^
SUBJECT: Amendment of Ordinance No. 436 Requiring Floor Drains in
Restrooms
The present day plumbing code does not require a floor drain in public
restrooms and our Ordinance does. 1 have checked with other municipalities
and they do not require the floor drains in public restrooms either.
In the interest of uniformity, I would offer the following amendment which
will not require the provision of floor drains in public restrooms.
ORDINANCE NO. 436 - Al
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 436 DELETING THE REQUIREMENT
FOR FLOOR DRAINS IN RESTROOMS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 436 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 3(a) Each steam bath or heat bathing room, - rest- rom-ot-
beth Dmw, shall be equipped with a floor drain installed in
conformance with the City Plumbing Code.
<t � r,
4 '
SCHEDULE I
Annual Disclosure Report for Calendar Year- 1981
Tax
Increment
Project
SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT AREA
Tax
Increment
District
1201
To be completed by all Tax Increment Districts:
1. State dates that bonds were first issued? October 1981
2. State date that Authority first acquired property with the district?
JUNE 1978
3. State date that Authority first constructed (or caused to be constructed)
public improvements in the district? SEPTEMBER 1978
4f Did district have excess tax increment, as defined in Minn.-Stat. Section
273.75, Subd. 2, for the reporting period? YES NO x
5. Should tax increment district be cancelled? YES NO x
If yes, attach resolution of governing body requesting that the Director
of Property Taxation of Hennepin County take appropriate action.
-3-,-
Annual Disclosure Report for Calendar Year 1981
• Tax Increment Project 1201
Tax Increment District SOUTHEAST (EDINA)
ASSESSED VALUE:
$2,491,062 Original Assessed Value
7,216,893 Captured Assessed Value
7,216.893 Captured Assessed Value retained by
Authority
' NONE Captured Assessed Value shared with
other taxing
districts
TAX INCREMENT:
391,246.50 Total Tax Increment received to end
of reporting
period
346,537.88 Total Tax Increment expended to end
of reporting
period
BONDING:
4,500,000.00Bonds sold at end of reporting period
23.871.25Total Interest Payments Y (Discount)
4,500,000.00Total Bonded Indebtedness
Amount of Outstanding Indebtedness:
4,500,000.00 Principal
3,492,450.00 Interest
PLEDGE OF REVENUES:
Bond
Proceeds
Other Revenue
Principal
NONE
NONE
Capitalized Interest
261 1560.75
Other Interest
10,500.00
Project Expenditures
NONE *
NONE
*Latest approved Project Expenditures Budget is
NONE
Total remaining on pledge to:
Principal & Interest
316,769.37
Project Expenditures
NONE
-2-
S.
Housing And Redevelopment Authority of EDINA (sbuTHEAST)
Annual Disclosure Report for Tax Increment District #
for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 19 81 .
REVENUE:
1201
Bond Proceeds
$49500,000.00
Bond Premium
Debt Service Investment Earnings
10,504.00
Redev. & HRA Funds Investment Earnings
Loan $MM
63,000.00
Loan Repayment
Land Sales Proceeds a
Capitalized Interest
Rental Income
Other Income Community Development Funds
7,831.76
_
Tax Increment Income
391,246.50
TOTAL REVENUE
$4,972,578.26
EXPENDITURES:
Bond Capitalized Interest Payments
.
BMW Other- Interest Payments and discount
35,102.96
RmW Principal Payments LOAN
346,537.88
Project Capital & Contract Expenditures
42214,578.00
Project Administration (Incl. Opn. acgd. prop.
122.388.19
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
$4.718,607.03
EXCESS EXPENDITURES OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER)
253,971.23
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Transfer from other Funds o
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures
FUND BALANCE - January 1
FUND BALANCE - December 31
-1-
_$ 24,263.46
$ 278.234.69
i
N.
SCHEDULE I
Annual Disclosure Report for Calendar Year 1981
•Tax Increment Project 50th & France Commrcial Area
Tax Increment District 1200
To be completed by all Tax Increment Districts:
1. State dates that bonds were first issued?
December 1, 1975
2. State date that Authority first acquired property with the district?
July 1975
3. State date that Authority first constructed (or caused to be constructed) 5
public improvements in the district? August 197
4? Did district have excess tax increment, as defined in Minn. Stat. Section
273.75, Subd. 2, for the reporting period? YES NO X
5. Should tax increment district be cancelled? YES NO X
If yes, attach resolution of governing body requesting that the Director
of Property Taxation of Hennepin County take appropriate action.
•3-
t
Annual Disclosure Report for Calendar Year 1981
•• Tax Increment Project 1200
% Tax Increment District 50th and France (Edina)
ASSESSED VALUE:
• 3,122,419
Original Assessed Value
• 3,448,778
Captured Assessed Value
=• 3,448,778
Captured Assessed Value retained by
Authority
NONE
Captured Assessed Value shared with
other taxing
districts
TAX INCREMENT:
216,871.27
Total Tax Increment received to end
of reporting
period
216,871.27
Total Tax Increment expended to end
of .reporting
period
BONDING:
NONE
Bonds sold at end of reporting period
125,638.00
Total. Interest Payments
1,900,000.0oTotal Bonded Indebtedness
Amount of Outstanding Indebtedness:
'•.;
1,900,000.00 Principal
957,412 Interest
''• PLEDGE OF
REVENUES:
Bond Proceeds
Other Revenue
Principal
NONE
NONE
Capitalized Interest
NONE
Other Interest
NONE
Project Expenditures
NONE *
NONE
*Latest approved
Project Expenditures Budget is PROJECT COMPLETE
Total remaining on pledge to:
Principal & Interest
NONE
Project Expenditures
NONE
-2-
1
. i .
Housing And Redevelopment Authority of EDINA (50th & France)
Annual Disclosure Report for Tax Increment District N 1200
for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 19 81 .
REVENUE:
Bond Proceeds
Bond Premium
Debt Service Investment Earnings
Redev. & HRA Funds Investment Earnings
Loan Income
Loan Repayment
Land Sales Proceeds .
Capitalized Interest
Rental Income
Other Income
6,036.00
Tax Increment Income
216,871,27
TOTAL REVENUE $
222,907,27
EXPENDITURES:
Bond Capitalized Interest Payments
Bond Other Interest Payments & LOAN
140,338.00
Bond Principal Payments
106,000.
Project Capital & Contract Expenditures
Project Administration (Intl. Opn. acgd. prop. )
6,409.31
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $
246,747.31
EXCESS EXPENDITURES OF REVENUES OVER (UNDER) $
(23,840.04)
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES:
Transfer from other Funds
Excess of Revenues and Other Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures
FUND BALANCE - January 1
J
FUND BALANCE - December 31
-1-
(29,871.15)
(53,711.19)
} •
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various
separate parcels:
Lots 1 and 2, Cleveland§ Subdivision, Parkside Replat
and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide
said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein
called "Parcels "):
Lot 2 and the Southerly ten feet (10') of Lot 1, Block 1, Cleve-
land's Subdivision, Parkside Replat; and
Lot 1 except the Southerly ten feet (10') thereof, Block 1,
Cleaveland's Subdivision, Parkside Replat; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the pur-
poses of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of
Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made
in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with
the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 12th day of July, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 12,
1982, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
RRq()T.TTTT(1N
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various
separate parcels:
Lots 1 and 2, Cleveland§ Subdivision, Parkside Replat
and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide
said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein
called "Parcels "):
Lot 2 and the Southerly ten feet (10') of Lot 1, Block 1, Cleve-
land's Subdivision, Parkside Replat; and
Lot 1 except the Southerly ten feet (10') thereof, Block 1,
Cleaveland's Subdivision, Parkside Replat; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the pur-
poses of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of
Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made
in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with
the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 12th day of July, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 12,
1982, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 13th day of July, 1982.
City Clerk
LC�a7OCM MaR -1 b 1
Y
ORCOA
LANs
0
NUMBER LD-82-6
�N
5T
_
r �
N_
M
� MON
1.
ISO. _
IIIN
■
■
LOCATION Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Cleveland's Subdivision, Parkside Replat
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
r
' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
:JUNE 30, 1982
LD -82 -6 Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Cleveland's Subdivision, Parkside
Replat. Generally located north!of Hollywood Road and
south of Division Street.
The proponents are requesting a simple lot division whereby the south
10 feet of Lot 1 is transferred to Lot 2. Setback requirements continue
to be met.
Recommendation
Approval.
V
L (01 F, 0�1- [11 n- P
IF-H 1 .11
NUMBER
LOCATION:
PZA
� ti 111
L _o)1 y
LD -82 -5 Part of Registered Land Survey No. 1278 and
part of unplatted property
Generally located in the southwest quadrant of (Nest 66th
Street and T.H. 100
E®QNIA PLAN NH'IG Di�PART SENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JUNE 2, 1982
LD -82 -5 Part of Registered Land Survey No. 1278 and part
of unplatted property generally located in the south-
west quadrant of West 66th Street and T.H. 100.
REFER TO: ' Attached survey
The property proposed for division is a large single family lot owned by
Mrs. Strand which fronts on the west frontage road of T.H. 100. The
proponent, Mr. Zamansky, resides immediately to the north of this lot
at 5041 W. 66th Street which is legally described as Tract A and the west
40 feet of Tract B, Registered Land Survey 1278. Mr. Zamansky desires
to acquire the westerly 150 feet of Mrs. Strand's lot (parcel A on the
survey) to add to his lot. No new buildable lot will be created by this
lort division.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of this lot division conditioned on a revision
of the legal descriptions of the new parcels. It is imperative that Parcel
A be formally combined with Mr. Zamansky's lot in order to prevent a
landlocked parcel. Therefore, Mr. Zamansky's new description should be:
Tract A and the West 40 feet of Tract B, all in Registered
Land Survey No. 1278, and the West 150.00 feet of the
South 200.0 feet of the North 430.00 feet of the West 567.00
feet of the Southeast Quarter of Sec. 4, T. 116, R. 21.
Mrs. Strand's new description should be:
That part of the South 200.00 feet of the North 430.00 feet
of the West 567.00 feet of the Southeast.. Quarter of Sec. 4,
T. 116, R. 21, lying westerly of the West right -of -way line of
State Highway No. 100, except the West. 150.00 feet thereof.
t
i
'� _
.410
July 9, 1982
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PARKING LOT
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -P -13
LOCATION: Edina Community Center Parking Lot
HEARING DATE:
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $122,963.30
(Includes Engineering, Clerical -& —Interest)
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
PINS NUMBER
School Dist. #273 W P 19- 028 -24 -23 -0001
p �
QUANTITY
MATERIAL
NIT
PRICE
TOTAL
1,740
L /F,
Concrete Curb & Gutter Removal
$ 1.00
$ 1,740.00
780
L /F,
5' High Cyclone Fence, Remove & Replace
$ 10.00
$ 7,800.00
17
Each,
Concrete Filled Steel Posts, Removed
$ 10.00
$ 170.00
1
Each,
Clear, Grub & Remove Tree
$150.00
$ 150.00
2,450
C /Y,
Excavation, V.M. (1' Depth, Reshape)
$ 4.50
$11,025.00
2,100
S /F,
Concrete Sidewalk, Remove
$ 0.50
$ 1,050.00
2,640
L /F,
B6- 18'Concrete Curb & Gutter
$ 5.25
$13,860.00
99
L /F,
Concrete Bumper Curb
$ 4.75
$ 470.25
1--.
Each, Disconnect & Plug Sprinkler System as
- indicated on Plan
Lump Sum
$
500.00
1
Each, Locate & Lower 3" Galvanized Pipe
Lump Sum
$
600.00
2,825
Tons, Cl. 2 Gravel, 6" Thick, Compacted
$ 6.45
$18,221.25
942
Tons, Minn. D.O.T. 2341, 2" Thick, Compacted
$ 25.00
$23,550.00
35
L /F, Type R4999 DH (Neenah) Trench Drain 0 -4'
Deep
$175.00
$
6,125.00
17
L /F, Type R 49999 CH (Neenah) Trench Drain 0 -4'
Depth (Includes Removal & Replacement Curb
Helper)
$175.00
$
2,975.00
2
Each, Type "C" Catch Basins, 0 -6' Depth
$500.00
$
11000.00
38
L /F, 12" R.C.P. 0 -8' Depth
$ 22.00
$
836.00
575
S /F, 4" Concrete Walk
$ 1.75
$
1,006.25
Page 2 of 2 Pages
Estimate of Cost
City of Edina, Minnesota
Improvement No. P -P -13
July 9, 1982
UNIT
QUANTITY MATERIAL PRICE TOTAL
6 Each, F & I 22" Flowering Crab Trees
B & B $187.50 $ 1,125.00
1,000 . S /Y, Sod on 4" Compacted, Salvaged
Black Dirt
$ 2.00
$
2,000.00
1 F & I Paint Striping
Lump Sum
$
300.00
2 Each, Adjust Manhole
$ 70.00
$
140.00
650 S /F, Wood Retaining Wall
$ 7.25
$
4,712.50
SUB- TOTAL: $ 99,356.25
ADD 10% ENGINEERING AND 2% CLERICAL: $ 11,922.75
$111,279.00
ADD 10.5% CAPITALIZED INTEREST: $ 11,684.30
$122,963.30
Prepared By
Checked By
Francis J. HOTTmaV P.E.
Director of Public Works and ity Engineer
MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
SUBJECT: EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER
DATE: JUNE 18, 1982
I. Human Relations Commission Opinion
After a discussion by the HRC of the merits of the Edina Community Center to
the citizens of the City, opinions were expressed. Eight members felt the
Center was of benefit to the people of Edina and one member questioned whether
it was of more benefit to the School District than the community as a whole.
II. Information obtained from interviews with people connected with or using the
Community Center.
A. Parks and Recreation - Bob Kojetin
1. Parks and Recreation could operate adequately without the Community
Center. Schools can be used free of charge.
2. KEGA (Gymnastics) previously used schools free of charge but had to
dismantle equipment after each use. Now uses Community Center and pays
A fee but can leave equipment set up.
3. Swim Club has used pool.
B. Seniors - Sue Weigle
Community Center used as a satellite to the Senior Center on York Avenue.
1. Seniors use of Center presently:
a) Woodworking shop - great asset.
b) Offers opportunity for Seniors as volunteers to work with small
children in child care center.
c) Community Education is very cooperative and coordinates well with
the York Senior Center. Offered bus for travel series. Seniors are
regular participants in day classes.
2. Possible future use:
a) Ceramics class and cooking class.
b) Senior Spring Show in Center's theatre.
c) Additional classes and services.
Memorandum -2- June 18, 1982
C. Community Education - Rod Brannon
1. Some approximate statistics:
a) 281 classes offered last quarter - 400 classes offered next fall.
b) 3600 people attend day classes - 5000 will attend day classes
next year.
c) 650 summer school users.
2. Community Center is necessary for Community Education to function well.
a) The needs and interests of the community can now be met. Having no
.Community Center would make a large dent in the Community Education
program.
b) Unique class opportunities can be offered, i.e. cooking, photography,
woodworking.
c) Baby sitting is available to both students and teachers of classes.
d) Performing Arts can expand. The Edina Theatre Company is based
at the Center.
3. Classes help combat feelings of isolation in the community. Comradery
often develops between people taking classes.
D. Community Center -.Doug Johnson
1. Space Use:
a) 200,000 square feet rentable space.
b) School District uses 70,000 square feet.
c) Tenants use 50,000 square feet.
d) Program permit space 80,000 square feet. (Short term space for
anything that is scheduled. Community Education uses this space.)
2. Space requests from School and City are honored first.
3. Choice parts of building are not leased but saved for permit space.
4. Expansion of parking would add an additional 110 spots which would help
handle average use, not special events.
5. Lutheran High School:
a) Has 180 students.
b) Occupies 12,000 square feet.
0 Uses approximately 20 parking spaces.
MG:md
Memorandum -3- June 18, 1982
6. Some Edina organizations that have used the Center (also see attached):
a) Camp Fire
b) Chamber of Commerce
c) Storefront /Youth Action
d) ECCO
e) Edina Families in Action
f) CRP (Cultural Resource Pool)
UTHAT'S HAPPENED IN THE EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER?
Here's a sampling of events, groups, etc. that have taken place in
the Center to date:
Edina H.S. Football Boosters Club South View Testing
CRP Storytelling Workshop
Microcomputer Seminar
State of `'.inn. Aero. Seminar
Maryville Group
Senior High Party Committee
Christmas Botique
Compucamp
Prison Fellowship
Ca=pfire International Tea E.G.A.A.
DNR Turkey Seminar March of Dimes
Jr. High Track Colony Park Church
Assoc. for 1•omen in Computing Fitness & Weight Training
Seminar
Cable for the Able Control Data
Sr. Citizens Open Woodshop
Community Ed. Classes, etc.
Air Aid School
Cub Scouts
Xerox
YMCA
Edina H.S. Soccer
Edina Marching Band _
South View Science Classes
Pre- School Screening Spanish Class for Corporate Commodores
American Party Caucus
Edina Kiwanis
Drivers Educ.
Singles Groups
Jr. League of Mpls.
I.R. Party Convention
DFL Caucus
Fairview Southdale Nurses
P.A.C.E.
I-M. Inst. of Thanatology
South View Phy. Ed.
Mary hay Cosmetics
So. Hennepin Hu-can Services
Executives
MSHSL Coaching Clinics 4 -H
T -Shirt Sale Edina Pep Band
Metro. Schools Assn. Wheelchair Basketball.
Twin City Food Svc. Assn. EBA Tryouts
Edina Newcomers Parkview Treatment Centers
Northern Telecom Edina League of Women Voters
Lutheran H.S. Activities Cablesystems Seminars
Carl Luther Business Seminars Youth for Christ Rally
Jr. High Gymnastics TIES Coordinators
Church Services Edina Rec. Karate Classes
Weddings State Conf. for School
_ Volunteers,- - -=
Mpls. Grand Slam Bridge Battered Women Support Group
Football,Parents EGAA Basketball Tryouts
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
As At February 28, 1982
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Due from Other Funds
Contracts Receivable
Loan To Other Funds
Inventory:
$ 380,290.17
3,800.00 $ 384,090.17
3,564.49
58,536.15
415,000.00
Liquor
$ 498,162.78
Wine
358,101.72
Beer and Mix
52,182.19
908,446.69
Prepaid Expenses:
' Unexpired Insurance
$ 8,001.50
Supplies Inventory
400.00
8,401.50
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
$1,778,039.00
FIXED ASSETS:
Land
$ 233,784.60
Land Improvements
$ 21,630.50
Buildings
727,488."7
Furniture and Fixtures
293,719.64
Leasehold Improvements
3,035.55
$1,045,873.96
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization
336,328.58
709,545.38
Construction in Progress
700.00
944,029.98
TOTAL
ASSETS
$2,7222068.98
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Payroll
,Due To Other Funds
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
$ 132,330.92
. 6.193.39
138,524.31
481 445.32
619,969.63
SURPLUS:
Invested in Fixed Assets $ 9441,029.98
Unappropriated 1,158,069.37 2,102,099.35
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,722,068.98
0
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
Two Months Ending February 28, 1982 and February 28, 1981
1982 1981 INCREASE - DECREASE*
50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total
SALES:
394,458.82 2
275,210.64 9
924,238.84 2
266,610.05 3
334,835.48 2
257,259.85 8
858,705.38 1
12,040.67* 5
59,623.34 1
17,950.79 6
65,533.46
Liquor $
85,861.87 $
177,864.68 $
- 145,855.38 $
409,581.93 $
85,022.87 $
185,947.08 $
152,983.25
423,953.20
$ 839.00 $
8,082.40*
$ 7,127.87* $
14,371.27*
Wine
55,827.74
103,022.62
80,641.71
239,492,07
54,135.71
101,696.57
81,978.12
237,810.40
1,692.03
1,326.05
1,336.41*
1,681.67
Beer
30,789.74
61,387.11
45,925.82
138,102.67
30,627.48
62,673.90
47,842.27
141,143.65
162.26
1,286.79*
1,916.45*
3,040.98*
Mix and Miscellaneous
2,113.08
4.232.27
3,698.25
10 043.60
2,301.63
4.776.05
4,176.38
11 254.06
188.55*
543.78*
478.13*
1210.46*
174,592.43 4
346,506.68 $
276,121.16
797,220.27
172,087.69
355,093.60 4
286,980.02 $
814,161.31
2,504.74 $
8,586.92*
10,858.86*
16,941.04*
Less bottle refunds
4,866.24
11 732.75
9,446.09
26,045.08
4,711.63
12 020.20
10,482.68
27 214.51
154.61
287.45*
1,036.59*
1,169.43*
NET SALES
169,726.19
33 ,773.93
266,675.07
771,175.19
167,376.06
343,073.40
276,497.34 $
786,9 6.80
2,350.13
8,299. 7*
9,822.27*
15,771.61*
COST OF SALES:
Inventory -January 1
Purchases
Inventory Feb. 28
254,569.38 3
394,458.82 2
275,210.64 9
924,238.84 2
266,610.05 3
334,835.48 2
257,259.85 8
858,705.38 1
12,040.67* 5
59,623.34 1
17,950.79 6
65,533.46
129 227.38 2
259 006.59 2
234 283.06 6
622 517.03 1
126 501.00 3
304 084.95 2
238 288.32 6
6-68-074-2-7 2
2,726.38 4
45,078.36* 4
4.005.26* 4
46,357.24*
$ 3831796.76 6
653,465.41 $ 5
509,493.70 $
$1,546,755.87 $ 3
393,111.05 $ 6
638,920.43 $ 4
495,548.17 $
$1,527,579.65 $
$ 9,314.29 *
*$ 1
14,544.98 1
13,945.53 1
19,176.22
243 949.43 3
377 092.85 2
287 404.41 9
908 446.69 2
252 239.27 3
349,753.07 2
258 874.26 8
860 866.60 8
8.289.84* 2
27 339.78 2
28 530.15 4
47 580.09
$ 139,847.33 2
276,372.56 $ 2
222,089.29 6
628,309.18 1
140,871.78 2
289,167.36 $ 2
236,673.91 1
1,666,713.05 4
4 1,024.45* 1
12,794.80* 4
4 14,584.62* $
$ 28, 03.87*
4 4 4
4 2 3
GROSS PROFIT $ 29,878.86 $ 58,401.37 $ 44,585.78 4 132,866.01 $ 26,504.28 8 53,906.04 $ 39,823.43 $ 120,233.75 $ 3,374.58 $ 95.33 $ ,76 .
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling 9,483.22 17,172.93 13,804.35 40,460.50 10,470.04 19,629.91 16,613.57 46,713.52 986.82* 2,456.98* 2,809.22* 6,253.02*
Overhead 4,994.26 7,170.59 5,824.30 17,989.15 5,861.68 8,091.47 6,587.41 20,540.56 867.42* 920.88* 763.11* 2,551.41*
Administrative 13,336.02 15,904.85 13,814.28 43,055.15 9,139.35 13,100.80 10,898.03 33,138.18 4,196.67 2,804.05 2,916.25 9,916.97_
TOTAL OPERATING $ 27,813.50 $ 40,248.37 $ 33,442.93 $ 101,504.80 $ 25,471.07 $ 40,822.18 $ - 34,099.01 $ 100,392.26 $ 2,342.43 $ 573.81* $ 656.08* $ .1,112.54
EXPENSES
NET OPERATING $ 2,065.36 $ 18,153.00 $ 11,142.85 $ 31,351.21 $ 1,033.21 $ 13,083.86 $ 5,724.42 $ 19,841.49 $ 1,032.15 $ 5,069.14 $ 5,418.43 $ 11,519.72
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discount 2,231.91 4,840.47 4,105.86 11,178.24 1,986.94 5,401.26 3,856.46 11,244.66 244.97 560.79* 249.40 66.42*
Cash over or under 11.48 66.59* 27.65 27.46* 4.39 56.27* 46.65 14.01* 15.87 10.32* 19.00* 13.45*
Income on investments -0- -0- -0- -0- -0- -0-
Other 39.92 41.71 36.51 118.14 288.20 28.97 53.54 370.71 248.28* 12.74 17.03* 252.57*
-- $ 2,283.31 $ - - -- 4,815.59 $ - 4,170.02 $ 11;268.92 $ 2,270.75 $ 5,373.96 $ 3,956.65-$ 11.601.36 $ 12.56 $ 558.37 *_ $ 213.37_ -$ - 332,44 * - -
N ETIN COM E $ 4,348.67 $ 22,968.59 $ 15,312.87 $ 42,630.13 $ 3,303.96 $ 18,457.82 $ 9,681.07 $ 31,442.85 $ 1,044.71 -$ 4,510.77 $ 5,631.80 $ 11,187.28
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross profit 17.60% 17.44% 16.72% 17.231 15.84% 15.71% 14.40% 15.28%
Operating expenses 16.39 12.02 12.54 13.16 15.22 11.90 12.33 12.76
Operating profit 1.21% 5.42% 4.18% 4.07% .62% 3.81% 2.07% 2.52%
Other income 1.35 1.44 1.56 1.46 1.35 1.57 1.43 _1.47
NET INCOME 2 561 C. 86% 5 74% 5 53% 1 97% 5 38% 3.50% 3.99%
ire
�f
ire
�f
- WEST
SUDE
CMZENS
ORGANIZATION
209 West Page, St. Paul, MN 55107 292 -8020
June 25, 1982
Dear Representative:
This letter is written to encourage your interest and urge your
involvement in a very important matter. The Northern States
Power Company (NSP) has applied for an Air Quality Permit from
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to incinerate oil which
is contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB's) at its
St. Paul High Bridge generating plant located on the shore of
the Mississippi River -- right in the heart of a major metropolitan
area.
As is generally known, PCB's are themselves incredibly toxic
substances. However, the expected by- products of burning PCB -
contaminated oil include dibenzofurans and dioxins, which are
considerably more toxic than PCB's. These chemicals have been
known to cause serious health disorders, including liver and
lung disease, severe skin irritations and respiratory complications
and have been associated with birth defects and cancer in laboratory
studies. The plume from such a burn could cover a 50 -mile radius
of the High Bridge plant -- threatening far more than just the
2 million metropolitan residents. You can well appreciate the
effect it will have on property values throughout that radius
as well.
Our months of research and careful evaluation of this issue have
convinced us.that collecting this toxic waste from surrounding
states, transporting it and burning it in the middle of a major
metropolitan area is extremely hazardous and absurd. Yet, this
is what NSP intends to do.
We fully recognize the necessity of disposing of this hazardous
substance, but we urge that one of several safe alternatives be
utilized rather than permit NSP to subject the region's population
to its dangerous proposal.
Public hearings before a state hearing examiner will be held on
this important environmental issue August 9 through August 13 at
the State Office Building, 435 Park Street, St. Paul (across from
the capitol).
N
Page Two
June 25, 1982
As one endowed with the trust and support of the people whom you
represent, we respectfully request and urge participation in this
matter. Find.out how your constituency feels about NSP's proposal.
Let the-mayors of Minneapolis and St. Paul know of your position
and that of your constituency. Hold a press conference to increase
public awareness of this matter and to air your views. Contact NSP
and request more information regarding their proposal. Write
letters to the editor of your local newspaper encouraging public
involvement in this issue. These are just a few suggestions as to
how you can, and should, become actively involved in this matter.
The public and environmental health of Minnesota depends on
everyone's assistance. (Indeed, the public health has already
been threatened in a recent incident involving PCB's. A fire
at Hill- Murray High School on June 22, 1982, caused the emission
of PCB's which, in turn, caused contamination of the school,
possibly its water supply and surrounding soil, and caused the
hospitalization of several individuals who were exposed to the
burning PCB's.)
If you wish to become a party in*this matter, or if your county
or city or other organizations known to you wish to become a
party, Petitions to Intervene must he submitted in accordance
with Minnesota law before July 15, 1982. Such Petitions should
be forwarded to Kent Roberts, Office of Administrative Hearings,
400 Summit Bank Building, 310 Fourth Avenue South, Minneapolis,
Minnesota, 55415 (phone: 612 -341- 7612).
If you wish to participate as a witness, you must be prepared
to attend the hearing and to bring all information or evidence
bearing on the case which you wish to have included in the record.
We are sure that you share our deep concern in this matter and
will join our efforts to insure a clean and non - endangered environ-
ment as well as the health and safety of individuals living within
the environment.
If you desire further information concerning this matter, please
contact Pat Isaac of the West Side Citizens Organization, 209
West Page, St. Paul, MN 55107 (phone: 292 - 8020).
(612) 333 -5544
Diamond
Exchange
Associates July 6, 1982
Inc.
Mr. C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor
Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
City of Edina, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
I am writing with reference to the home of my mother
and her neighbors on Morningside Road.
You may recall that a few years ago several hundred
families petitioned and stormed City Hall for changes in
connection with the street improvements. A number of positive
results were obtained in a cooperative manner. Amongst those
included an arrangement between the City and Northwestern Bell
to remove the ugly old out of date telephone cable on both
Morningside and Grimes which comes out of the ground at Wooddale
and returns underground at France. In fact street work was
slightly delayed while Bell installed all its new cable. The
old cable is still hanging on the posts years later.
Now a new blight is occurring. The Cable TV installers
are putting their cable just above the ugly Bell cable that
"is to be removed ". Work is in progress "now "! There is no
excuse. As we worked out back then, all homes can be served
from the rear on existing right -of -ways. All through feeders
can follow like routes. It is not necessary to use Morningside.
I am told that a number of residents contacted Edina before
the TV Cable to make sure it was not placed on the street
frontage - yet there it is.
Please: 1. Correct the TV Cable installation before
it is too late.
Midwert Uum."I Ewhany,
2. Get N.W. Bell to fulfill its promise.
Jeweler
Board of Trade
If necessary I can organize another onslaught to
Jewelers
Vigilance Committee
support your position andyI am virtually certain a 100%
Jewelry lndustry Council
boycott of Cable TV by area residents will be arranged
Retail Jewelers
if a more attractive installation is not made . You may
of America
Minnesota Retail
inform the Cable franchisee of same. Man would like the
Many
11cW1 ef5 aapolis °°
cable but not blighting the neighborhood and replacing
Greeter Minneapolis
Chamber of Commerce
one eyesore with another.
Credit Bureau
of Minneapolis
Best wish to both of you,
Better Business Bureau
of Minnesota
VR
ard V. Nov
103 South Seventh Street, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
SEND VALUABLE MAIL TO: BOX 2101 LOOP STATION, MPLS MN 55402
11
a
Mr. mmi i n nd
Cfi. blesystems
10210 "rosstolm Circle
Eden Pry irie, ' 111 55314
Dear :'r. :i3vilr nd
June 20, 19:32
Tile cable le, ^_d -, rich I s -noke to you about is still across
our .pict .Ire i.,rimlow o.. I,,'.-.e north side of our noiise. 1.,ast
week you c,Aled and agreed to send your crow out
nesday June 16 to discuss aT_d correct the situ,-tion.
I remrired ',some all d, -gy ? °ut no representative c,_ -.e
from your company.
As I told you over no ohone, the power co-r.Tmny
re.rrrn?^�ed taneir nnles so rs not to interfere t�nith
ot?r *i_t,. The telernor.e ccmnra y ., )- :-.gently '�?:t their
cables uncier,-rourid. r'rae +C inch c?ist,:nce renuire;cnt
from cower line to cable will Drec?ude str;n -iny a
c- bl a on t; 0 p ^les t ",A `,rill not block our view.
Our neif•!z?_ors see- to aTree t:.,:,t t zc clz..ce for the
is i1ndier ^roumd nnd' I wr%i.il:o -.one ;rou c:r_„ -n! :e
arr!,n�ererts for a :e out of town next
week ^rid I ,''anted you to know this before you string
your cable on „he lend ccble wriere it is not wr:rted.
ce :'cnry D. t'ersors
in a. City Council
Sincerely,
Mr. Htvilpnd,
C,ablesys l/ems
10M Crosstown Circle
rden. Pr,,Irie, ';N 5531 ?'Y
Dear Vr, Ilavilnnd.,
June 20, 1982
T'ne cable lead which I s.00ke to you about is still across
our picture window on '61ie north side of our house. Last
week you called and agreed to send your crew out I,led-
nesday June 16 to discuss and correct she situation.
I remeined hone all day but no representative came
from your company.
As I told you over the phone the pourer company
rearranged their Doles so as not to interfere urith
oiler *-- . The telephone company apparently but their
cables underground.. The 140 inch di stance re- quirement
fro -:�? �o��er Line to cable will preclude stringing a
cable on the poles t'Llat cri ll not block our view.
Our neisyhbors seem to agree that the place for the
cable is underground and I would. hope yoz' can !nalke
arrangements for ';his. `.'e v, *311 be out of iown neat
week and I wanted you to know this be-fore you string
your cable on the load cable where it is not iianted.
cc Henry D. Persons
LP?ina City Council
Sincerely,
S /,,'y� cfir.
5'��3 C
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: June 17, 1982
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian, i :
SUBJECT: Amendment of Ordinance No. 436 Requiring Floor Drains in
Restrooms
The present day plumbing code does not require a floor drain in public
restrooms and our Ordinance does. I have checked with other municipalities
and they do not require the floor drains in public restrooms either.
In the interest of uniformity, I would offer the following amendment which
will not require the provision of floor drains in public restrooms.
ORDINANCE NO. 436 - Al
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 436 DELETING THE REQUIREMENT
FOR FLOOR DRAINS IN RESTROOMS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 436 is hereby amended to read
as follows:
Sec. 3(a) Each steam bath or heat bathing room, - rest- rom -or-
beth•room -, shall be equipped with a floor drain installed in
conformance with the City Plumbing Code.
t
association of
metropolitan
municipalities
June 22, 1982
TO: Mayors, Managers and Delegates
RE: ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES ANNUAL
REPORT OF OPERATIONS FOR 1981 -1982 MEMBERSHIP YEAR
(JUNE 1981 - MAY 1982)
The A14: has now completed eight years of operations and I
am pleased to submit to you the attached annual report. -for
1981 -1982. The financial position of the AMM remains strong
and the number of member cities stable.
I would like to emphasize that the AMM Officers, Board 14'embers,
and Staff welcome your inquiries, suggestions and advice as to
how we can make the AMM more beneficial to its member cities.
Your participation and input is what makes the Ai'414 work and
please do not hesitate to contact the Association office whenever
we can be of assistance.
Sincerely,
Vern E. Peterson, Executive Director
VPjcw
attachment
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600
as ociation of
metro olitan
municipalities
p
A N N U A L R E P O R T
OF
0 P E R. A T I 0 N S
FOR FISCAL YEAR
1981 -1982
Issued: June 22, 1982
183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600
ANNUAL REPORT OF OPERATIONS
LEGISLATIVE ACTIVITIES
The Major function of the AMP,1 is to provide representation (lobby)
for the common interests of its member cities to the Legislature,
State Agencies, Metropolitan Council and Metropolitan Commissions.
The AMM had approximately 72 legislative "action policies" for the
past legislative biennium. These action policies were the culimi-
nation of many, many hours of work by the AMM Policy Committees,
Board of Directors and Staff. As a result of ,the deteriorating
national economy and the continuing state financial crisis, we did
suffer some major setbacks in state pass through revenues and levy
limits. In spite of these setbacks, the AMM was successful in
accomplishing 45 of the 72 action policies for the past biennium.
The AMM was successful with the help of its member city officials
to modify a major bill on surface water management to preserve the
basic authority and responsibility for surface water management at
the local level. Helped to defeat severe restrictions on Tax
Increment Financing and the use of Industrial Revenue Bonds; cities
containing active gravel pits will share in the distribution of the
tax levied by the county; the Metro Governance Study Bill which
was sponsored by the AMAI was passed; implementation of the Co-
efficient of Dispersion penalty was delayed until 1984; and the
maximum interest rate for municipal bonds will float monthly based
on the Bond Buyers' Index of 20 municipals plus one percent and then
rounded to the next highest full percent. (For a more complete
analysis of the legislative activity, see Appendex A).
The AMAI Policy Committees will start meeting in late July to
develop policy for 1983.
II. METROPOLITAN LEVEL ACTIVITIES
At the request of the AMM, the Metropolitan Council prepared and
adopted a "Procedure for Adopting or Amending Metropolitan Council
Regional Policy Plans ". This is equivalent to the State Admin-
istrative Proceedures Act (APA) and should provide for a uniform
and consistent process to be followed by the Metropolitan Council
in their dealings with local government and the general public on
policy matters. The Metropolitan Council did propose one major
new policy plan in late 1981 relative to Surface 19ater Management
and the A11.11i found this proposed plan to be completely unnacceptable.
The Council is now in the process of revising its proposal and we
will continue to watch this activity very carefully. The AMM's
position is that the Council's plan must be in conformance with the
newly passed state law for Surface Water Management. The Metropolitc
Council has modified its Transportation Policy Plan to allow
-2-
consideration of light rail transit and the metropolitan counties
are .forming a transit authority to acquire abandoned rail right of
ways for possible future public uses. The AM)M also helped defeat a.
proposal which would have transferred control and operation of the
Mosquito Control District to the Metropolitan Council from the
counties in the metropolitan area.
The Ai111 also provided input for a number of other minor council
projects and programs including their 1982 budget and.work program.
The A11M also played a role in recommending and advising.the .
Metropolitan Council in relationship to membership on several
Metropolitan Council Advisory Committees including the Transportation
Advisory Board, the Technical Advisory Committee, the Chairmans'
Advisory Committee, the HRA Advisory Committee and the Cable
Communications Task Force.
III. SUPPLE!dE_NTAL SERVICES
The AMM provides a number of support services to its member cities
in addition to the lobbying and representation activities. We
coordinate and manage the Metropolitan Area Salary Survey and contribute
one third of the total funding. We also published the 1981 Elected
Officials Salary Survey and coordinated and published a Municipal Fee
Survey in July of 1981. The Municipal Fee Survey will.be updated and
published in odd - numbered years. The AMT11 continued its financial
support for the ongoing coordinated labor relations management effort
for metropolitan area cities.
The 5th. Annual Levy Limit Seminar to train elected officials and city
staff members was attended by over 200 officials last July. The LMC
contracted with the AMM to conduct four additional seminars in outstate
Minnesota which had combined attendance of over 300 more officials. The
last tasks identified in.the cooperative agreement betiveen.the AMNI and
Metropolitan Council with respect to identifying steps which can be
taken by cities to hold down the cost of housing were completed. The
fifth and last report in a series of joint reports entitled "The Cost
of Public Service for Housing" was published in June of 1981. A wrap -up
conference entitled "Where will our children live" was held in
September and more than 250 people were in attendance. The joint
LMC /AAIM Legislative Conference held in January was well attended and
included more than 100 Legislators and State Agency Officials.
Roger Peterson continued to represent the AP:111 on the 208 Water Quality
Advisory Committee and Vern Peterson represented the AM!,,l on the State
Shade Advisory Committee and the Metropolitan Councils' Chairmans
Advisory Committee. Jan Haugen, AMM Board I~.Iember served as the A`.IM's
representative on the `Ietro Aggregate Reserves Advisory Committee. The
AMM continued to provide the secretarial and administrative support for
the Metropolitan Area Management Association. Cindy Rodd, the A`,IM
Secretary- and Administrative Assistant left the A-MM Staff and was
replaced by Carol Williams who was formerly the City Clerk in Hugo.
-3-
IV. MEMBERSHIP. FINANCES AND BUDGET
The AMM ended the year with 63 city members containing over 8570
of the residents in the 7 county metropolitan area. Several other
cities have voted to join or rejoin the A�41.1 for 1982 -83. The AMM
Board and Staff will continue ongoing efforts to attract new
members. Even though these are difficult times financially for
cities, there is good opportunity for membership increase.
After holding the line for four years, there will be a general dues
increase for 1982 -83. The increase in rate is not large but it is
based on the 1980 population figures and so in some cities it will
be more noticeable. The A111M dues are based on the L�.IC dues and are
currently set at 487o for 1982 -83. It should be noted, however, that
as a percentage of LMC dues, the AM1 dues rate has decreased from a
high of 60% in 1975 to 48/10 for 1982. The decrease in AMM dues as a
percentage of LMC dues is a result of growth in membership, higher
than expected earnings on investments, and careful monitoring of
expenses. The AMM has now completed its eighth year of operation
and during that period of time the budget increases averaged 5.40
per year contrasted to the general inflation rate which averaged
slightly over loo per year during this same period.
The AMM began the year with a reserve of $56,460 and ended the
year with a pre -audit reserve of $53,310 (See Appendex B for budget
and financial details).
V. A LOOK TO THE FUTURE (1982 -83
As we close the books on 1981 -82 membership year and look ahead to 1982 --
83 which will be the ninth year of operation for the A.B1,.there is
reason for optimism. While most signs from the state and federal
level indicate that pass thru funds to cities will not be increasing
as they did during the past decade, there might be opportunities for
cities to regain more control of their own destinies. A number of
policy makers at the state level are talking about eliminating local
government mandates, giving political subdivisions more local options
for raising revenue and perhaps dedicating a portion or a fixed percent-
age of the sales tax receipts to local units of government. There is
not overwhelming support for any of these possibilities but they are
being discussed seriously by key people. Significant changes to levy
limits is also a possibility. While there is immense political
timidity among legislators to eliminate levy lirnits; there is
increasing awareness among informed legislators that levy limits may
have the opposite results from those intended.
What does this all mean ?. There are difficult changes and challenges
ahead for the cities in the metropolitan area. By working together
through the AMM, there will also be many opportunities to strengthen
the ability of city officials to serve their constituents more
-_ _- _.effectiN-ely. -. -- As -then- Preside nt- -Jim -- Krautkr.emer-- -said -- in-- concl- uding - -h -is
report at the AMIM Annual Meeting on May 26th. - - you as member city
-4-
officials will determine the effectiveness and future of the
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities in representing the
interests of metropolitan area cities - - - you are the
Association!
APPENDIX B
Financial Statement
SECTION 1 1982 -83 BUDGET
SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES
Salary Survey
1980 -81
1981 -82
1981 -82
1982 -83
PERSONNEL
ACTUAL
ACTUAL *
BUDGET
BUDGET
Salaries
$
78,799
$
86,721
$ 86,900
$ 93,955
PERA
700
. 4,284
4,735
4,780
5,175
Health Insurance
2,450
$136,212
2,676
3,420
3,780
Social Security
4,357-
5,103
5,200
5,800
Life Insurance
393
429
435
435
$
90,283
$
99,664
$100,735
$109,145
OPERATIONS
Conf. &. Travel
$
4,770
$
4,088
$ 5,800
$ 6,000
Rent
4,877
5,652
6,100
6,200
Telephone
1,601
1,597
1,900
2,100
Postage
1,639
1,893
2,000
2,300
Equipment
94
315
395
410
LMC Services
3,721
4,122
4,100
4,600
Office Supplies
1,190
1,400
1,000
1,000
Miscellaneous
576
890
900
1,000
Audit
475
525
500
575
$
18,943
$
20,482
$ 22,695
$ 24,185
SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES
Salary Survey
$ 10,106
$ 11,104
$ 11,400
$ 12,100
Labor Relations
3,000
3,270
3,270
3,170
Newsletter
1,637
1,445
2,200
2,200
Coimnittee Support
310
247
700
1,100
$ 15,053
$ 16,066
$ 17,570
$ 18,670
$124,279
$136,212
$141,000
$152,000
* Pre -Audit Figures
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
APPENDIX B
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND FUND BALANCE
(PRE- AUDIT)
1981 -82 FISCAL YEAR
Beginning Year Balance- - - - -$ 56,460
Dues Income - - - - - - - - - - 122,006
Interest Income - - - - - - - - 11,022
Other Income 34
}189,522
Expenses $136,212
Ending Year Balance 53,310
Net Gain (Loss) (3,150)
STATEMENT OF PROJECTED INCOME EXPENSE AND FUND BALANCE
1982 -83 FISCAL YEAR
Beginning Year Balance- - - - -$ 53,300
Projected Dues Income - - - - - 140,000
Projected Interest Income - - - 7,000
Projected Total Funds Available $200,300
Projected Expense (Budget) 152,000
Projected Ending Year Balance $48,300
t
as ocia�ion of
me�ropo itan
municipalities
APPENDIX A
1981 -1982 AMM POLICY STATUS
Attached is a status summary of 1981 -1982 AMM
action policy. The Year and Chapter number is
included where law was enacted and year or years
included where the policy is one of maintenance
or opposition. A brief description of the law
change or policy status is provided.
Action Policies for 1981 -1982 72
Policy Met or Partially Met 45
300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 222 -2861
AMM POLICY SUMMARY FOR 1981 -1982
POLICY
YEAR/
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
STATUS /COMMENT
I -A
8% Levy Limit Repeal
No
-
Levy Limits extended to 1983 at an 8%
increase over the actual general levy made
in 1982. Bonded debt becomes strictly a
Special Levy rather than optionally part
of the General Levy.
I -C -1
Local Government Aid
Yes
1981 -82
No changes were made in the current formul
Formula
I -C -2
LGA Increase
No
1981 Special
Local Government Aid was reduced by
Session 063
$30 million as part of the overall state
HF 2
budget solution. This resulted in an
11.1% decrease for 1982. As of March 1982,
the $30 million is restored for 1983.
I -D -1
Tax Exempt Property
-
-
Bills were introduced but not passed by
committees.
I. -D -2
Maintenance of Real
-
-
No consideration (Bills introduced)
Property
I -D -3
Tax and Special Assessment
Yes
1982
Interest rates charged for delinquent
Delinquencies
Chapter 523
property tax and special assessments will
be based on the secondary market yield of
one year U.S. Treasury bills calculated
on a bank discount basis rounded to the
nearest percent. The rate will be
calculated annually in December for the
following year.
I -D -4
Public Property
-
-
No consideration
Acquisition
I -D -5
Property Tax
-
-
No consideration (Bills introduced)
Disbribution from
County
I -D -6
Railroad Taxation
-
-
Bills introduced but did not pass from
committee
STATUS /COMMENT
Imposition of this penalty.was delayed
until 1984.
HF 1872 provides for sales ratio study.
No penalty provisions for low sales ratios
were adopted by the legislature.
No action by the legislature.
Changes were made to clarifil 'district'
and 'project' and what portion of land
had to be occupied with buildings. Admin-
istrative expense percent was increased to
10 with services for bond counsel, fiscal
consultants, and planning or economic
consultants added. Process changes were
made. Knock down was changed to 4 years.
Base value will _increase per inflation.
Temporary bonds may be sold.
No consideration.
Bills were introduced and received
committee hearings but did not pass.
Various studies started .i.n 1979 arc
continuing.
Bills were introduced and received
committee hearings but did not pass
Revenue Sharing was continued for three
years.
Cities containing active gravel pits will
be included in the distribution of the tax
levied by the county. The tax is 10 cents
per cubic yard or 7 cents per ton of which
the city receives 300
POLICY
YEAR/
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
I -E -1
Co- efficient of Disper-
Yes
1982
sion Penalty
Chapter
523
I -E -2
Sales Ratio Equalization
Yes
1982
Chapter
523
I -E -3
Office /Hotel assessment
Yes
1981 -82
procedures
Tax Increment Financing
Par. t.i.al
1982
Chapter
523
I -F -2
Reinvestment Fund
-
-
I -F -3
Fiscal Notes
-
-
I -F -4
Minnesota City N.iscal
IaI..ti;1.l.
1979
Study
I -F -5
Hotel /Motel Amusement
-
-
Tax
I -F -6
Federal Revenue Sharing
Yes
1981
I -F -7
Gravel Tax
Yes
1982
Chapter
523
STATUS /COMMENT
Imposition of this penalty.was delayed
until 1984.
HF 1872 provides for sales ratio study.
No penalty provisions for low sales ratios
were adopted by the legislature.
No action by the legislature.
Changes were made to clarifil 'district'
and 'project' and what portion of land
had to be occupied with buildings. Admin-
istrative expense percent was increased to
10 with services for bond counsel, fiscal
consultants, and planning or economic
consultants added. Process changes were
made. Knock down was changed to 4 years.
Base value will _increase per inflation.
Temporary bonds may be sold.
No consideration.
Bills were introduced and received
committee hearings but did not pass.
Various studies started .i.n 1979 arc
continuing.
Bills were introduced and received
committee hearings but did not pass
Revenue Sharing was continued for three
years.
Cities containing active gravel pits will
be included in the distribution of the tax
levied by the county. The tax is 10 cents
per cubic yard or 7 cents per ton of which
the city receives 300
POLICY
YEAR/
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
STATUS /COMMENT
II -A
Shade Tree Disease
Partial
1981
All state funding was eliminated. The
Program
Ch. 356
program was unmandated in the Metropolitan
Sp -Ses.
Ch.1
Area, thus, it is now voluntary state wide.
The special levy continues for 1983.
II -B
Tree Removal and
Yes
1981 -82
No action by the legislature
Treatment Licensing
II -C
Municipal Bond Interest
Yes
1982
Maximum interest rates will float monthly
Rates
Chapter
523
based on the Bond Buyers' Index of 20
Municipals plus one percent and then
rounded to the next highest full percent.
Special assessment rates may be one percent
higher than the maxumum bond sale rate.
The rate sunsets to 9 percent January 1,
1986. Negotiated sales are _increased from
$200,000 to $:300, 000.
II -D
Industrial Development
Yes
1982
IDR Bond interest rates remain unlimited
Revenue Bonds -
Chapter
523
until January 1, 1986 at which time the
Interest Rate
maxumum rate becomes 9 percent.
TI -E
Oppose Municipal Bond
Yes
1981 -82
Bills were introduced but not passed.
Sale control by the
State
II -F
Oppose Employee
No
1981
Employee Residency as a condition of employ -
Residency Prohibition
Chapter
181
ment in Metropolitan Area cities and
counties is prohibited. The bill appears
not to prohibit time or distance require-
ment for certain class of employees, if
job related.
II -C
Municipal Self- Insurance
Yes
1981 Sp.Ses.
They correct bill was repassed and signed.
Chapter
4
II -H
Green Acres
-
1982
Major changes proposed by AMM policy were
Chapter
523
not adopted. However, the law was changed
to allow 'green acred' land to be sold
and deferments continued if the new owner
maintained the agricultural use of the land
II -I
911
Yes
1981 -82
.Funding was continued but at a reduced
POLICY
YEAR/
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
STATUS /COMMENT
II -J
Veteran's Preference
Partial
1981 -82
No changes were enacted.
II -K
Oppose 3.2 Beer Prohibition
Yes
1981 -82
Bills were introduced but not passed.
II -L
Special Elections for
Yes
19,81
Statutory City Council
Chapter 172
Bill was passed as proposed by AMM. A
Vacancies
vacancy in the first two years of a four
year term will be filled by appointment
until the next regular election at which
time it will be filled for the remaining
two years by election.
II -M
Judicial ,System
Partial
1981 -82
Grant funding was continued for Youth
Service Bureaus.
II -N
Watersheds Districts
Replaced
-
See Summary for Policy IV N Surface Water
Management.
II -O
Local Police and Fire
-
-
No legislative consideration.
Pension Provisions
II -P
Binding Arbitration
Yes
1982
'Item by item final offer'was extended to
Chapter 635
July 1, 1983 for essential employees.
Thereafter, arbitration returns to 'con-
ventional' unless the employee group and
employer agree to either 'item by item
final offer' or package 'final offer'.
Supervisory and confidential employee
arbitration is mandatory 'item by item
final offer'. All other employees may
utilize any type of arbitration if it is
agreed to by the employer.
II -Q
County Prosecution
-
-
Bills were introduced but not passed by
committee.
II -R
Building Code
Yes
1981 -82
The building code was not changed for the
Metropolitan Area.
II -S
Municipal Board
-
-
Bills were introduced but not passed.
IT -Y Uniform Information
Practices
IT -% Oppose Initiative -
Referendum
i
III -A -1 Housing Market Analysis
III -A -2 Examine Local
Requirements
Yes
N/A
STATUS /COMMENT
Resolution of this problem was passed b;
the legislature in the Worker Comp bill
but vetoed by the Governor
See summary fore Policy TV N Surrace Watt
Management
No consideration by the legislature
Local control and_.authority was maintair.
Local units may opt out of Chapter -238
regulations for franchises under 1000
subscribers by resolution. .`The Metro-
politan Council review time-for f_>�anchis
boundries reduced from 90 to 45 days.
Post rules allow a four year college
graduate to certify through Metro State
University with minimal course work. T1
Post Board and community college system
are investigating varied skills course
offerings. Post is investigating and wj
soon offer suggestions for minority
recruitment. Reciprocitil with other st
provides for pol-ice of r. i cer tos t.i ng and
hiring.
Bills were introduced and heard in
committee but not included in final pas:
of Data Privacy Act Amendments.
Bills introduced but not passed.
1981 -82 No legislation. Metropolitan Council
actively working on analysis.
Local units to examine own requirements,
Does not require legislation.
!'OL.TCY
YEAR/
POLICY ND.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
II -T
Employee Disability -
-
-
Double dipping
II -Ir I
Storm Sewer. Reserve
Yes
1982
Fund
_ Chapter 509
II -V
Condominiums Plat
-
-
Filing
II -W
Cable Communications
Partial
1982
Chapter 514
I
and 515
II -X
Police Officer
Partial
1982
Eligibility and
Recruitment
IT -Y Uniform Information
Practices
IT -% Oppose Initiative -
Referendum
i
III -A -1 Housing Market Analysis
III -A -2 Examine Local
Requirements
Yes
N/A
STATUS /COMMENT
Resolution of this problem was passed b;
the legislature in the Worker Comp bill
but vetoed by the Governor
See summary fore Policy TV N Surrace Watt
Management
No consideration by the legislature
Local control and_.authority was maintair.
Local units may opt out of Chapter -238
regulations for franchises under 1000
subscribers by resolution. .`The Metro-
politan Council review time-for f_>�anchis
boundries reduced from 90 to 45 days.
Post rules allow a four year college
graduate to certify through Metro State
University with minimal course work. T1
Post Board and community college system
are investigating varied skills course
offerings. Post is investigating and wj
soon offer suggestions for minority
recruitment. Reciprocitil with other st
provides for pol-ice of r. i cer tos t.i ng and
hiring.
Bills were introduced and heard in
committee but not included in final pas:
of Data Privacy Act Amendments.
Bills introduced but not passed.
1981 -82 No legislation. Metropolitan Council
actively working on analysis.
Local units to examine own requirements,
Does not require legislation.
POLICY
YEARI
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIRTIQN
MET
CHAPTER
STATUS /COMMENT
1- 11 -A -3
Mandatory :standards
ParL.i..rl
1982
Statutes wore mudiVind n" th"L ciLian c:an
Chanter
490
not prohibit manufactured housing built
after 1976 meeting HUD standards. 11owcver,
cities retain the authority to regulate
the location, size, amount, etc. of all.
housing with various conditions.
III -A -4
Program Latitude
-
-
No consideration.
III-A-5
Renewal of Funding
Yes
1981
Funding was renewed for renovation and
Chapter
306
rehabilitation of substandard housing
units.
III -A -6
juthority For.Local
Partial
1981
Additional flexibility was granted.
Housing
Chapter
306
III -A -7
Metropolitan Bond Guarantee -
-
No consideration.
Fund
III -A -8
Practices which Increase
N/A
-
No legislation necessary. .Metropolitan
Housing Costs
Council not active to date.
III -B
Rental Housing in the
-
-
No consideration.
Metropolitan Area
IV -A
Purpose of Metropolitan
NIA
-
Statement of policy only. N" rrctibn
Agencies
necessary.
IV -B
Criteria for Extension of
Yes
1981 -82
No new power granted.
Metropolitan Organization.
Power
IV -C
Metropolitan Governance
Yes
1981
A legislative study commission of 5
Study
Chapter
250
Representatives and 5 Senators has been
established to undertake a detailed study.
IV -D
Administrative Conduct
Yes
1981 -82
The Metropolitan Council adopted a
procedure similar to Chapter. 15 for
Council Policy adoption.
POLICY
YEAR/
PO I, .ICY RHO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
PITT
CIIAP1'IiR
STATUS/COMMENT
IV -E
Adjacent County Growth
Partial
1982
This concept is included in the work
program for the Metropolitan Governance
Study Commission.
IV -F
Comprehensive Plan
Yes
1981
The legislature passed permisive
Amendment Procedure
Chapter 242
legislation to allow the Metropolitan
Council to adopt the guidelines that had
been negotiated with the AMM and various
cities and approved by the Council and
AMM Board of Directors.
IV -G
Comprehensive Plan -
Yes
1981
The AMM, LMC, and EQB have formed a joint
Environmental Review
task force which is actively meeting. to
Process
develop review guidelines.
IV -H
Comprehensive Plan -
Yes
1981 -82
Legislation is not required.
Local and Regional
Interaction
IV -I
Hazardous and Solid
Partial
1981 Ch.352
These bills clarified some problems in the
Waste
1982 Ch.569
1980 Waste Management Act and allows more
time for local input. The bills were
consistent with the AMM policy.
IV -J
Metropolitan- Council
N/A
-
This policy does not require legislative
Budget Procedures
action.
IV -K
Sewer Availability
Yes
1981 -82
Metropolitan Council is currently reviewinc
(.hnrge (SAC)
SAC through comprehensive plans ind is
devc.lopi.ncl policy.
IV -L
MetropoliLan Parks and
N/A
-
This policy is activated only if the
Open Space - Funding
legislature determines that Regional or
State funding for Operations and Ma_int-
ance is desireable. This was not done in
1982.
IV -M
Impact of Regional
N/A
-
At this time, the AMM is working with the
Parks on Host
Metropolitan Council to establish a study
Communities
per the policy for 1983 legislative
recommendations.
POLICY NO.
IV -N
V -A
V -B
POLICY YEAR/
POLICY DESCRIPTION MET CHAPTER
Surface Water Manage- Yes 1982
ment Chapter 509
STATUS /COMMENT
A Watershed Management Organization must
be created for each Watershed by December
31, 1983 through Chapter 112 or by Joint
Powers. If none is, the county will
assume jurisdiction. The wmO must create
a plan by December 31, 1985 which is
reviewed by several agencies including
the Metropolitan Council and approved by
the State Water Resources Board. Local
units then need to dovelop a Frlrrn
consistent with the WMO plan if one does
not exist. Approval is by the WM0. Costs
for planning, capital improvements, and
maintenance may be recovered through
special levy beyond those levies set by
Chapter 275. Appointment of managers
for a Chapter 112 WMO will be by the county
board from lists of nominees submitted by
the effected cities and towns. Any local
government unit may establish a special
watershed management tax district for
taxing purposes.
Energy and Mass Yes 1982 The Metropolitan Council has modified its
Transit Alternatives policy to allow consideration of light rail
transit. The Metropolitan Counties have
formed a transit authority to acquire
abandoned rail right of ways for possible
use for future light rail transit.
Finally, various light rail transit studies
are continuing.
MN /DOT funding Yes 1991 MN /DOT. Funding was incr.-eased through Motor
Chapter 363 Vehicle Registration tax increases on
certain vehicles, personalized plate cost
increases, and a 2 cent per gallon gas
tax increase. These funds will be shared
with the Highway Trust Fund.
POLICY
YEAR/
POLICY NO.
POLICY DESCRIPTION
MET
CHAPTER
STATUS /COMMENT
• V -C
City - MN /DOT Cooperative
-
-
Discussions with MN /DOT are being held.
Projects
V -D
13C' Transportation
-
-
Bills were introduced but not heard in
Planning Process
committee.
V -E
State and County
-
-
No legislative action in 1981 or 1982
Highway Turnbacks
V -F
Signal Light Maintenance
-
-
Discussions with MN /DOT are being held
V -G
MTC Funding
-
-
No consideration of any studies relating
to zone fare and property tax as they
.
relate to services provided
Taxi Cab Regulation
Yes
1982
Bills were introduced to transfer
regulation to the Metropolitan Council.
They were defeated in committee and no
changes were made.'
BOD -1
IDR Bond Restrictions
Yes
1981 -82
Bills severely restricting IDR Bond use
Chapter 523
were introduced but killed in committee.
IDR Bond use was extended to 'tourism'
projects (including hotels and motels)
for the entire Metropolitan Area.
BOD -3
Temporary Improvement
Yes
1981
Allows an additional three year issuance
13ond Rollover.
Chapter. 17.7
of temporary improvement bonds.
BOD -4
metropolitan Mosquito
Yes
1982
7'110 Mosquito Control. District was not
District
Chapter 579
transferred to the Metropolitan Council,
the levy authority was increased to six -
tenths of one mill, and eastern Carver
County was included.
COMMUNITY AND
POLITICAL . 1 1,
ORGANIZING
A WORKSHOP
Mankato State University
July 19 -23, 1982 12:30 -5:30
Political Science 4/590
Two Credits
GUEST PRESENTERS.:
Harry Boyte - author of The Back and Revolution Understanding
the New Citizen Movement,, and director of the Citizen
Heritage Center.
Eileen Guthrie Collard - Co- author (with Warren Sam MiZZer) of
Process Politics, aZumna of MSV, and community deveZopment
specialist.
Jim Schaible - Member of St. Paul City Council, Associate
Director of the Citizen Heritage Center and community
organizer.
Ann Kanten - Activist in People's Initiative on Zand, food, and
justice and the American Agriculture Movement.
AND MORE
The workshop will be valuable to anyone interested in citizen
participation, whether experienced or novice, activist or onlooker.
It may be taken for grade, P /N, or audit, undergraduate or graduate
credi t.
REGULAR IN -STATE FEES - RESIDENT UNDERGRADUATE = $36.70
RESIDENT GRADUATE = $45.30
SPEICAL SENIOR CITIZEN FEE = $12.00
(62 AND OVER)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CALL DR. CAROLYN SHREWSBURY 389 -2077 OR
THE POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT 389 -2721.
9
Political Science Department
BOX 07
Mankato State University
Mankato, MN 56001
2 -10037
'HALLBERG FLORENCE B
4801 W 501H ST
EDINA
MN 55424
f-
z
059;
=
974969---.j i
'HALLBERG FLORENCE B
4801 W 501H ST
EDINA
MN 55424
;of" d to] I-Erel ldh
iIIIII rJIL1111 league of minnesota cities
June 22, 1982
TO: Mayors, Managers and Clerks
FROM: Joel Jamnik, Research Assistant
RE: Proposed Discontinuance of Federal Surplus Property Program
The Commissioner of Administration has proposed to discontinue the Federal Surplus
Personal Property Distribution Program in Minnesota. This program provides for the
distribution of surplus federal property to governmental and non - profit organizations
at prices far below the original acquisition cost of the property.
The procedure the state will follow is to have Governor Quie request that the Federal
Governmeliit Service Administration close the program out. The letter may go out as early
as Friday, June 25 or Monday, June 28. The federal procedure will take about six
months to complete. If the program is discontinued, Minnesota will be the only state
without access to federal surplus property. '
- I
The Commissioner's motive in proposing to discontinue the Minnesota program is to si ave
the state the cost of staffing and operating the distribution center (an estimated
annual cost of $60,000 over what the state receives). It is possible that the benefits
to local units of government exceed the cost to the state in administering the program
in which case the discontinuance of the program would actually cost Minnesota taxpayers
more than continuing to operate the program.
If your city has used the program in the past (or would like to use it in the future)
and would like to see it continued, you should write a letter to, or call, Governor
Quie stating how you have used the program and the amount of money your city has saved
and ask Governor Quie to at the least delay requesting that the program be discontinued
until a more thorough analysis of its impact is conducted. Facts and figures are needed
and we request that cities also inform the League as to what has been purchased and how
much has been saved through the use of the program.
Prompt action is required if we are to convince Governor Quie to delay (or decide against)
requesting the federal government to discontinue the program.
JJ:rmm
300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 (6 123 222 -2661 '