HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-12-06_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
REGULAR MEETINGS
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
DECEMBER 6, 1982
7 P.M.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of November 1, 1982, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of
, seconded by
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
ROLLCALL
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Robert Obermeyer
EDINA MASONIC LODGE CONTRIBUTION - Messrs. Oris Benson and Everett (Bud) Erickson
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of
Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divi-
sions, Flood Plain Permits, Plats, Appeals from Administrative or Board
of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5
favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Leo Evans Property - Generally located South of Vernon Ave., East of
Olinger Road and North of Merold Dr. (Part of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4
of Sec. 32, R. 117, R. 21 (Continued from 11/15/82)
B. Lot Divisions
1. Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition - Generally located North
of Tanglewood Court and West of Gleason Road
2. Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition - Generally located North
of Tanglewood Court and West of Gleason Road
C. Set Hearing Date
1. Johnson Bldg. Co. - R -1 Residential District to PRD -3 Planned
Residential District - 4600 France Ave. S.
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON REVENUE SHARING FOR 1983 Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Action of %Council by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Cat Control - Mrs. Barbara Grossman
IV. AWARD OF BIDS AND QUOTES Tabulations and Recommendations by City Manager.
Action of Council by Resolution.
A. Civil Defense Siren
B. Dump Trucks (Continued from 11/15/82)
C. Sale of Aerial Ladder Fire Truck
D. City Properties Refuse Pickup
E. Police Cars
F. Public Health Contract
Edina City Council Agenda
December 6, 1982
Page Two
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Preliminary Approval - France Ave. /T.H. 494 Plans
B. Major Transportation Improvements - Metropolitan Area
C. Notice of Claim - Ms. Alys Yarmo
D. Community Task Force - Chemical Dependency
E. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
F. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. RESOLUTIONS
A. Tax Forfeited Land
B. Sale of Lot 4, Block 1, Edina Village Replat
C. 5 Year State Aid Plan
D. Support of Changes in State Aid Formula
VII. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund Report as of 10/31/82
B. Claims Paid: Motion of , seconded by for payment
of the following Claims as per Pre -List dated December 6, 1982: Gen-
eral Fund, $80,325.57; Park Fund, $76,478.99; Art Fund, $1,073.61;
Park Construction, $51.00; Swimming Pool, $109.45; Golf Course,
$2,555.42; Arena, $4,849.32; Gun Range, $327.75; Water Fund,
$2,190.68; Sewer Fund, $681.38; Liquor Fund, $9,154.85; Construction,
$158.84; Total, $177,856.86; and for confirmation of payment of the
following Claims: General Fund, $134,873.90; Park, $4,339.69:
Art Fund, $716.88; Pool, $1,455.71; Golf, $7,712.81; Arena,
$8,087.18; Gun Fund, $391.09; Water Fund, $60,272.46; Sewer Fund,
$4,458.48; Liquor Fund, $100,197.13; Construction, $1,208.00; IBR,
$103,519.16; Total, $417,232.49; and for confirmation of payment of
the following Claims: General Fund, $32,747.78; Art Fund, $22.04;
Liquor Fund, $247,511.24; Total, $280,281.06
To: Edina City Council, Board of Education
From: Sue Bonoff, Judi Heidkamp, Madrienne Larson
In April, 1979, Edina citizens formed a task force. Its aim
was to study and recommend options for making our community a
healthier, more caring place to live. The task force's recommend-
ations are now working; a peer education group in our high school,
• Junior High Prevention Specialist, a Chemical Health Coordinator,
• community center, a chemical health advisory council, policy
revision in the schools, all have occurred because people got to-
gether and made them happen.. Both the School Board and the City
Council participated actively in creating the task force and im-
plementing its recommendations.
The programs created by the Community Task Force are valuable,
but there are still problems to be solved. Data gathered from
school, police and Storefront /Youth Action personnel indicate
chemicals are an ever present factor affecting the behavior of
Edina's young people. Concerned parents express the need for
more help in dealing with family problems, and our citizens,
young and old, continue to search for ways to bring meaning and
purpose to their lives.;
Today, the eyes of Edina citizens
are opening to the limitless possibilities that can be created in
our community by working together. Edina Families in Action, a
parent network, has joined with Storefront /Youth Action, Edina's
youth and family counseling agency, to form a new task force to
examine some of these possiblities. 'Again, the task force will be
comprised of representatives from each system and institution in
Edina. It's purpose will be to begin where the original task force
ended; to examine briefly existing programs, explore programs and
projects operating around the country, and finally, to recommend
action and outline.the steps necessary to implement its recommend-
ations.
It is the hope of those forming this task force that the Edina
City Council and the Board of Education will again participate
fully, by endorsing the concept and then naming a representative.
As in the past, the support and leadership provided by these two
bodies would add immeasurable value to the efforts of this task
force.
1 t'
kt
NUMBER LD -82 -10
L O C A T 10 N Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanglewood Court and west of
Gleason Road
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 1, 1982
LD -82 -10 Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanr..lewood Court and west of
Gleason Road.
Refer to: Attached survey
The proponent is requesting a party wall division of an existing two family
dwelling. Individual utility connections are in place.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval.
i
-SURVEY AND PROPOSED LOT Divisiojv Faz;
-
I?OA! CLARK CONSTRUCTION,.
�O
0
corn?(
0,
1 " =20'
7
BOO t .jj�%A PAR
OE4
0A
•ne
do
r �'J' 00
re ning Wall'
�JOOJ lai _f Ss'N /���� �'
&
to to 13 19 1
ID
0
7
0 SOP ry a.
10 ppj2CCL
�
.... 45-83...
1,20"
ring
1 December 1982
TO: The Edina Council
FROM: Roger Clemence on behalf of Leo Evans �``--s g
The proposal submitted for your consideration on December 6th calls for
twenty lots and twenty -six dwellings on the Leo Evans property. Four-
teen of the lots are recommended for single family detached occupancy.
Six lots are recommended for double bungalow occupancy. The single family
lots range in size from 10,250-square feet to 20,500 square feet with the
average single family lot containing 13,250 square feet. The double bunga-
low lots, all of which front on Vernon Avenue, range from a low of 15,300
square feet to a high of 26,800. The average double bungalow lot measures
18,12.5 square feet.
I believe the road layout responds directly to concerns expressed by Council
members at the November 15 meeting. Lot sizes are very generous. The unit
count is twenty -six.
I hope the proposal can receive your support. This has been a long process.
I expect we would all like to see its conclusion.
RDC /cd
TA
C
OLINGER —ROAD
\1 \\
III
tN�o. I i,
HIGHWOOD DRIVE --
'HEATHM LANE --
Z
_
'pj ai,
/
fit /'"�� N /boy >~ \,'•� �„', \�� r
/ ��
ol
RRS0T.T1TT0N
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, according to
the recorded plat thereof, which lies Northerly of the following described
line and its extensions: Beginning at a point on the Northwesterly line
of said Lot 1 distant 84.72 feet Southwesterly from the most Northerly
corner of said Lot 1; thence Southeasterly to a point on the Easterly line
of said Lot 1, distant 43.85 feet Southerly from the most Easterly corner
of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating; and
That part of Lot 1, Block 7, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof, except that part which lies Northerly of the fol-
lowing described line and its extensions: Beginning at a point on the
Northwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 84.72 feet Southwesterly from the
most Northerly corner of said Lot 1; thence Southeasterly to a point on
on:_.the..Easterly line of said Lot 1, distant 43.85 feet Southerly from
the most Easterly corner of said Lot 1 and said line there terminating;
and
WHEREAS., the requested subdivision is authorized under Ordinance No. 801 and it
has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations
of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as sep-
arate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of
Ordinance No. 801 and 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and convey-
ance thereof as separate tracts of land, but only to the extent permitted under
Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 and subject to the limitations set out
in Ordinance No. 811 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or
as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the pro-
vision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compli-
ance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1982.
LOCATION MAP
. %Zc HYDE
PARR
z
��:c•'��
PN
>
/ SOCCERi'�
�y S
/ FIELD
ARCHERY +?►rr..�.
RANGE
n
00
•
V
A G\-E-
.
—1
LOT DIVISION
NUMBER LD -82 -11
L O C A T 10 N Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanglewood Court and west of
Gleason Road
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF .REPORT
DECEMBER 1, 1982
LD -82 -11 Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanglewood Court and west of
Gleason Road.
Refer to: Attached survey
The proponent is requesting a party wall division of an existing two family
dwelling... Individual utility connections are in place.
Due to the orientation
of the building,
the unit on Parcel A
will not own any
rear yard area. The
proponent states
that cross easements
will be provided
to allow use of the rear yard on Parcel
B by the owners of
Parcel A.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval conditioned upon our review of the cross easement
agreement and the City's right to notice if the agreement is amended in the
future. We have imposed this condition on other similar double bungalow
lot divisions.
4 4AItIty S. JOHNSON COMPANIES, INC. J
.el
V 1 Oy i fA T •�� )v
BLOOMINGTON. INN S
oT• 354 20
oHO.E 'GIV ob.-5341
/ v
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY /
FOR P>~rME �Qor'��TrES / S&A1.8
1Jaf2S
1. B9iWWW► S - Akm"14 A4W E4-SED oN A5Su&450 DATUM
i
c
e
- o
PA9c>:L "A" oa v
6102 S.F.
0.14DI Ate:
PARCEL. -"b.. DoT 4-
105(,2 S.F.
PaRc�L "" F3
r -
_' Nay °5a.•� „w .
o
'
Q
i
2.� � .B• ��
FkrSh.:p
(�
RETw:ra.i[q
O
v0
hpQ�
�y o
_' Nay °5a.•� „w .
RF.gnT.TTTTnm
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Northwesterly,
Westerly and Southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing
at the most Southerly Southwest corner of said Lot 4; thence on an assumed
bearing of North 7 degrees 12 minutes 51 seconds East along the Westerly
line of said Lot 4 a distance of 17.00 feet to the point of beginning;
thence North 43 degrees 21 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 45.56
feet; thence North 35 degrees 51 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of
58.15 feet; thence North 50 degrees 01 minute 31 seconds West a distance
of 23.99 feet; thence North 53 degrees 58 minutes 26 seconds West a distance
of 58.42 feet to a point on the Westerly line of said Lot 4, distant
68.08 feet Northeasterly from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 4 and
there terminating (Parcel A); and
That part of Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part
lying Northwesterly, Westerly and Southwesterly of the following des-
cribed line: Commencing at the most Southerly Southwest corner of said
Lot 4; thence on an assumed bearing of North 7 degrees 12 minutes 51
seconds East along the Westerly line of said Lot 4 a distance of 17.00
feet to the point of beginning; thence North 43 degrees 21 minutes 44 sec-
onds East a distance of-45.56 feet; thence North 35 degrees 51 minutes 54
.seconds East a distance of 58.15 feet; thence North 50 degrees 01 minute
31 seconds West a distance of 23.99 feet; thence North 53 degrees 58
T minutes -26- seconds West. a distance of 58.42 feet to a point on the West - -:
erlly line of Lot 4,_. distant"= 68&:0 &;feef Northeasterly from the most Westerly
corner of said Lot 4 and there _terminating (Parcel B)_;_and
- -F �'= -
WHEREAS; -, the requested subdivision is, authorized under Ordinance No. 801 and it
has been,.;deter.mined.that compliance'withf�the Subdivision and.Zoning Regulations
of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said parcels as
separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as sep-
arate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of
Ordinance No. 801 and 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and convey-
ance thereof as separate tracts of land, but only to the extent permitted under -
Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance NO. 811 and subject to the.limitations set out
in Ordinance No. 811 and said Ordinance are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the pro-
vision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) \
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 6, 1982, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting and that the lot division has
been made and cross easements have been given to the satisfaction of the
City. '
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this
City Clerk
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CEIL SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
SUBJECT: PROPOSED GENERAL REVENUE SHARING EXPENDITURES FOR ENTITLEMENT PERIOD 14
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1982
Attached is a summary of the Proposed General Revenue Sharing Expenditures
for Entitlement Period 14, October 1, 1982 to September 30, 1983, shown in
relationship to the overall Budget for the City in 1983.
A public hearing to receive comment on the proposed expenditures was held on
November 1, 1982, and no comment was received. There has been a publication of
notice that this budget is to be recommended for approval at the City Council
meeting on December 6, 1982, as its second public hearing.
If there is no comment then, the proposed General Revenue Sharing Expenditures
are ready to be presented for approval.
CMS:md
attachment
. (Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON GENERAL REVENUE SHARING
The City of Edina will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
December 6, 1982, in the Conference Room of the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th
Street, for the purpose of hearing written and oral comments from the public
concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1983 and the use of
revenue sharing funds as contained in that proposed budget, summarized below.
General Revenue Sharing (GRS) is a program of general fiscal support from the
federal government to state and local governments with only limited federal
requirements about how the money should be spent. Decisions on the use of
these funds are made at the local level, by the government and people closest
to local problems. The revenue sharing regulations require a hearing on the
proposed use of these funds in relation to the overall budget before the budget
is adopted each year.
All interested citizens, groups, senior citizens and organizations representing
the interest of senior citizens are encouraged to attend and to submit comments.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1983 BUDGET
OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Revenues
Source
Property Taxes
Sales Taxes
Service Charges /Users Fees
Licenses and Permits
Fines and Penalties
Income from Other Governments
Federal General Revenue Sharing
Activity
Education
Police
Fire
Roads /Transport /Public.Works
Sewers /Sanitation
Libraries
Parks /Recreation
Health /Hospitals
Social Services /Welfare
General Administration
Financial Administration /Deb
Reserve for Contingencies
TOTAL
Expenditures
GRS Funds
Service
$125,000
100,000
$225,000
Amount
$5,422,640
1,015,608
1,037,071
240,900
250,000
286,405
225,000
$8,477,624
Of-her Fnnric
$1,982,237
1,192,152
2,293,473
100,912
976,585
200,..289
46,240
735,674
380,062
345,000
$8,252,624
Please publish in the Edina Sun on Wednesday, November 17.
Please send us two affidavits of publication.
Total
-0-
$2,107,237
1,292,152
2,293,473
100,912
-0-
976,585
200,289
46,240
735,674
380,062
345,000
$8,477,624
r .+
(o ----
S!'i ✓1 ( I b S ��t, r
�/1rfiLv
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON GENERAL REVENUE SHARING
The City of Edina will hold a public hearing at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
December 6, 1982, in the Conference Room of the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th
Street, for the purpose of hearing written and oral comments from the public
concerning the proposed annual budget for fiscal year 1983 and the use of
revenue sharing funds as contained in that proposed budget, summarized below.
General Revenue Sharing (GRS)'is a program of general fiscal support from the
federal government to state and .local governments with only limited federal
requirements about how the money should be spent. Decisions on the use of
these funds are made at the local level, by the government and people closest
to local problems. The revenue sharing regulations require a hearing on the
proposed use of these funds in relation to the overall budget before the budget
is adopted each year.
All interested citizens, groups, senior citizens and organizations representing
the interest of senior citizens are encouraged to attend and to submit comments.
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED 1983 BUDGET
OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
Revenues
Source Amount
Property Taxes $5,422,640
Sales Taxes 1,015,608
Service Charges /Users Fees 1,037,071
Licenses and Permits 240,900
Fines and Penalties 250,000
Income from Other Governments 286,405
Federal General Revenue Sharing 225,000
$8,477,624
Activity
Education
Police
Fire
Roads /Transport /Public Works
Sewers /Sanitation
Libraries
Parks /Recreation
Health /Hospitals
Social Services /Welfare
General Administration
Financial Administration /Deb
Reserve for Contingencies
TOTAL
Expenditures
GRS Funds
Other Funds
Total
-0-
$125,000
$1,982,237
$2,107,237
100,000
1,192,152
1,292,152
2,293,473
2,293,473
100,912
100,912
-0-
976,585
976,585
200,289
200,289
46,240
46,240
735,674
735,674
Service
380,062
380,062
345,000
345,000
$225,000
$8,252,624
$8,477,624
-I Y/_ -A
CITY OF
EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
November 29, 1982
Ms..Florence Hallberg
Edina City Clerk
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Florence:
Please find enclosed a letter I received from
Barbara Grossman who has asked that this be communica-
ted.to.other members of the council. Could you please
have this matter put.on our next council agenda.
Ms. Grossman would like the council to consider
the contents of this letter. She does not plan to be
at that council meeting but would like a response:from
the council. Thank you-.
Very truly ours,
Frederick S. Richards
7mw
Enclosure
c: Barbara Grossman
7300 Lanham Lane
Edina, Minnesota 55435
November 19, 1982
Mr. Frederick S. Richards
7225 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Fred:
I would like you to present this to the City Council in the hopes that
something can be done about the freedom of cats in Edina.
As you know, my six -year old son, Matthew, was bitten by an unknown cat
in a neighbor's yard on November 8. Matthew did nothing to provoke the cat.
The cat just jumped up on him, licked his jacket sleeve and bit him on
the wrist -- piercing the skin. This cat makes the rounds of -the area
where Matthew was bitten on a regular basis, but no one knew whose cat
it was. The Animal Control Department and Curt Finch were successful in
locating the cat's owners, and I. appreciated their putting up posters,
distributing fliers, "staking out" the area, and all they did to find
the cat.
This experience has brought some questions to my mind about the freedom.of
cats in Edina.:__ There is a leash law in Edina for cats, but it doesn't
seem to be enforced. One of the reasons given is that cats are "mousers"
and help to keep.the rodent population down. Even if a cat has had rabies
shots, I feel it is dangerous for these cats to be free to come in contact
with and possible kill animals who-might have rabies and then'go back to
their neighborhood and owners and bite an innocent person.
Why aren't cats.-re
quired to wear license and rabies tags: If a cat is
licensed and has had rabies shots, the cat should be required to to wear
tags so if it does bite someone,..the owner and rabies information-are,
readily available.- I realize this interferes with their mousing and that'
some cats are injured by the tags getting caught in branches while the
cat is roaming. Perhaps a tag,.like the bracelet they give you in the
hospital, could be used. Not knowing who the owner is or rabies informa-
tion after being bitten by a cat far outweighs the problems of a cat.
wearing the tags as mentioned above. Having to face the possibility of
rabies shots id:not a pleasant thing.to:do if you know the cat's owner, but
not knowing the owner is very frightening and frustrating and is something
none of us would want to wish on anyone.
In trying to find the cat that bit Matthew, I called several neighbors to
see if they knew whose cat it was. All complained about the particular
cat that wandered in their yard regularly. This brings the question of
cats "doing -their business" in our yards. One lady whom I talked to said
ri
Mr. Frederick S. Richards
November 19, 1982
Page 2
she had a cat all summer visiting her yard and .doing its business under their
bedroom window. She asked the owner to do something about it. The owner
said she would but obviously didn't try very hard. This lady said she
couldn't open her window all summer because of the smell. After the cat
bit Matthew, it returned to the neighbor's yard.and proceeded to do its
business in their sandbox! I have a neighbor's cat who comes to my yard
regularly. I usually chase it away, because it scares the birds and also
does its business under a tree in my yard. I have enough to do, as do
other neighbors, to keep my yard looking nice without having to pick up
cat excrement. It is a very unpleasant job, as you well know, and one
which really makes me angry.
Another problem with wandering cats which I have experienced is their -.
getting under the hood of the car. The cat that visits our yard got under
the hood of a car parked in our driveway last spring., When the car was
started, there was a horrible noise and a very loud crying cat. The cat
had to have surgery and be hospitalized. This was a horrible experience
for us andlone I did not like my children to witness.
I was not happy to learn that after a cat has bitten someone and has been
located,'ihe cat is quarantined for ten days at the owner er's home. Since. -
rabies.is,a very serious disease and sometimes fatal, I believe-the cat,..
even if it_has had rabies shots, should be quarantined.by the City under
the supervision - -of the Animal Control Department or by a veterinarian
with the owner paying the cost of the quarantine. Cats are pretty slippery
creatures -and can scoot out the door in a flash. After being used to getting
out every day,!.I am sure that.after a couple of days of being in the house,
a cat is very anxious to go out and will look for every opportunity to
escape. Once a.-cat gets out, it is very difficult to get it back into the
house until'-it is ready to come in. Cats don't come when they are called
like dogs.- Sometimes a cat owner might not take his responsibility seriously
in quarantining his cat and may be careless in keeping his cat at home?for-
ten days.
I don't know if- anything can be done, and I am sure the cat owners would
not be too happy about restrictions on their pets. I do feel that cat
owners have ' a -responsibility to make sure their pets do not enfringe. -on
the rights and health of their neighbors. I would like to see cats
required to�.•wear license and rabies information tags and also for the -City
to supervise the quarantine of a cat at the owner's expense. I wanted you
and the City Council to be aware of my experience and consider my suggestions.
If you or any member.of the Council have any questions or reactions to this
letter, I would be happy to hear from you,(941- 8027).
Sincerely, -
d"4u.t-.a . Nxs-a���
Barbara A.�-.Grossman
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CEIL SMITH, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
SUBJECT: SALE OF AERIAL LADDER
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1983
On November 18, 1982, bids for the sale of the Fire Department's Seagrave-
100' Aerial Ladder were closed. We received one bid from the Pennsburg, PA
Fire Department in the amount of $52,759.00.
In view of the fact that this is within the projected dollar amount anticipated
by the sale of this piece of equipment, the staff recommends acceptance of
this bid and sale.
CMS:md
attachment
k
ORGANIZED OCTOBER 25, 1897
PENNSBURG, PA.
18073
Frank Willman
Edina Fire Department
6250 'Tracy Avenue
INCORPORATED NOVEMBER 20. 1899
Nov. 14, 1982
Edina, Minnesota. 55+36 �
Dear Prank;
Once again, thank you for the courtesy extended by you and your departwasnt on the
recent visit by Chief Beufield and Engineer Roeder.
At this time, the Pemzsburg Fire Company, through the power entru®te:1'to- the
'Truck Committee' does here -by submit a bid of: -
sa -1 s R .00 064-Auvid �6 T�Y -� flou s w% �:auew h Nn n�V 00/100
We would appreciate if you would telephone us at (215) 679 -8293 and relay the
results of the bidding. Please phone us at 7:pm Eastern Time.
Thanks again.
Respectfully yours,
VnFA
c
L,Ik 1 /3.0 8 u 7` /L' 4, Ji.G20X
Pennsburg Fire CompaaY Truck Commititee Memoers
i- .' "e- C h of
20 Assn Cti %-X elec-4
cft3f.. lie er
i\5A • L ot.
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: CEIL SMITH,.ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
SUBJECT: POLICE CAR BIDS
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1982
After review of the bids for full sized sedans for police usage, staff recommends
the bid from Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet. This is not the low bid. The low bidder,
Midway Ford, is not being recommended because of inability to meet specifications
in the following areas:
Interior head room front and rear
Wheelbase
Axle Ratio
Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet is the second low bidder.
CMS:md
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 3, 1982
Material Description (General Specifications):
Six (6) Full -sized Sedans for Police Usage
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1, Midway Ford Company
2. Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet
3. Suburban Chevrolet
Amount of Quote or Bid
Per Unit: $9,388 Total $56,328
Per Unit: $9,777 Total $58,662
Per Unit: $9,955 Total $59,730
Department Recommendation:
Nelson - Lenzen Chevrolet Total $58,662
480 Highway 212
Chaska, MN 55318
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is 1!' is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
I concur with the reconnnendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
LOCATION MAP
�~
�?
HYDE a
,^
p4 -7
CI i
^�
SOCCER
)' ^rE1: ,
.ZSri.
•;\ °� -�•
FIELD
/
ARCHERy,.
RANGE
tiS
"u
• .
-� wt
'1��'• �'
t
i a
- \,'+�� -fin )1 � ♦:T� ,�.y %.
• �(�♦ l I. Tom'
AZ
�I
FS,
LWA
LOS' DIVISION
NUMBER LD -82 -11
L O C A T 10 N Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanglewood Court and west of
Gleason Road
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
DECEMBER 1, 1982
LD -82 -11 Lot 4, Block 6, Braemar Hills 9th Addition
Generally located north of Tanglewood Court and west of
Gleason Road.
Refer to: Attached survey
The proponent is requesting a party wall division of an existing two family
dwelling.. Individual utility connections are in place.
Due to the orientation of the building, the unit on Parcel A will not own any
rear yard area. The proponent states that cross easements will be provided
to allow use of the rear yard on Parcel B by the owners of Parcel A.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval conditioned upon our review of the cross easement
agreement and the City's right to notice if the agreement is amended in the
future. We have imposed this condition on other similar double bungalow
lot divisions.
1.
FA c>:)- A.
6102' S. F.
0,1401 A..:
PARGE:L "15"
IOSroZ S.F.
0.242T AA..
�L
L
0
o°
LoT ¢ �y
Fa Fr- E�L "F3
i
FXI51ING�
•i o
7�C+
O I
DUP!
�o � i c�Aaxe f i G
1a ) O
PARCE
IN �• l O� c%1
427
`� � "- ''Nay °s�.•� °�
r=. 3ARRY S. JOHNSON COMPANIES,
INC.
BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA 95420
IF .01 WEST 70TH STREET
9`
PHONE Istal 68..5341
/
i
Prl
CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
/
FOR
I.Iof�s
I. g }QIN(s5 •N A9W 6550 ION AS -,Ljm O C47vM
'
i
c
pc,,,
0
FA c>:)- A.
6102' S. F.
0,1401 A..:
PARGE:L "15"
IOSroZ S.F.
0.242T AA..
�L
L
0
o°
LoT ¢ �y
Fa Fr- E�L "F3
i
FXI51ING�
•i o
7�C+
O I
DUP!
�o � i c�Aaxe f i G
1a ) O
PARCE
IN �• l O� c%1
427
`� � "- ''Nay °s�.•� °�
/V - F
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December- 2, 1982
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Beverly Ha - -is, Ch a' :p r-son,� Edina Health Advisory Committee
SUBJECT: Public H a1 Nur ^ Contract
On November 30, 1982, the Edina Health Advisory Committee met to consider -
three public health nursing proposals submitted by Bloomington Public Health
Nursing Set -vice, Visiting Nurse Service and Fairview Southdale Hospital.
Listed below are the bid proposals submitted by the three agencies:
Visiting Nurse Services $77,195
Bloomington PHNS 95,700
Fairview - Southdale Hospital 136,100
Visiting Nurse Service (VNS) and Fairview Southdale Hospital (FSH) both
submitted estimated bids which may be higher- or lower depending upon
utilization or unforseen problems in the delivery of the service. Bloomington
Public Health Nursing Service (BPHNS) submitted a flat rate proposal
meaning the contract will not be higher nor lower than $95,700 and Bloomington
will assume the risk.
The proposal from BPHNS and VNS are very comparable and meet specifications.
The proposal from FSH meets specifications with an extra program specifically
addressing Mental Health Services. Below is a breakdown of the proposals
by program area:
VNS
BLOOMINGTON FAIRVIEW- SOUTHDALE
Home Health
36, 213*
40,700
44,000
Community Nursing
31, 822*
32,000
23,200
Disease Prevention
6,000
11,000
2,150
and Control
Health Education
3,160*
4,000
3,500
Maternal E Child
Included
in 8,000
19,700
Health
Community
Nursing
Mental Health 10,700
Admin /Lab 33,500
TOTAL
77,195
95,700
136,100
Public Health Nursing Contract
December 2, 1982
Page two
In considering the three proposals, the Committee took into account the
following issues:
1. By staying with BPHNS we avoid the transferring of records, change
of personnel and we maintain continuity of care.
2. VNS will merge with Suburban Public Health Nursing Service as
of January, 1983, and become Metropolitan Visiting Nurse Association.
With this merger, they will serve all of Hennepin County with the
exception of Bloomington, Richfield and possibly Edina.
3. VNS projects that Edina has about 400 patients with unmet Home Health
care needs and will actively seek new patients. Their proposal is not
based on these additional patients and if this projection is true, the
cost for the Home Health component will probably increase.
4. The Fairview - Southdale Hospital proposal was the most expensive
but could be reduced by utilizing a different mixture of personnel.
5. BPHNS did submit a flat rate proposal and they are assuming the
risk of increased demands without affecting the contract price.
BPHNS and VNS are currently involved in the delivery of public health nursing
services and both agencies have an excellent reputation. Fairview- Southdale
presently is delivering Home Health services but would have to develop the
other nursing programs and train or hire personnel for the other programs.
The Edina Health Advisory Committee came to the conclusion that Edina should
stay with BPHNS for at least another year. This would give VNS a period of
a year to reorganize after the merger.
Also, after a year's experience in expanding the service area, VNS may be in
a better- position to develop a bid package with a maximum dollar amount for
the contract.
For those reasons, the Edina Health Advisory Committee recommends the Nursing
Contract for 1983 be awarded to BPHNS.
V -A &B
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANCIS HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINEER
VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: FRANCE AVENUE /I -494 PROJECT AND OTHER MAJOR METRO TRANSPORTATION
PROJECTS
Attached is a letter from Hennepin County requesting the City of Edina's
preliminary approval. The history of this project has been the followinq:
A. Mid - 1980 - Task Force formed (consistinq of MNDOT, Hennepin County,
Bloomington, Richfield and Edina) to develop design alternatives for
upgrading interchange.
B. April 1981 - Task Force agrees on preliminary design and Hennepin
County submits application for Federal Aid Urban Funding.
C. Mid - 1981 - Project receives high ranking for FAU Funding and designs
for interchange are prepared for public hearing.
D. May 1982 - Hennepin County conducts public hearing and City of Edina
supports proposed improvement.
E. Mid 1982 - FAU Committee of Metropolitan Council questions cost
estimate changes as plans are further refined. FAU Committee agrees
that project scope has not changed but will not participate in any
FAU Funding request to improve any part of I -494 adjacent to France
Avenue interchange. (The request by MNDOT to provide enough space
under bridge for four lanes in each direction.)
F. Fall - 1982 - Hennepin County requests City of Edina to give preliminary
approval to the plan. A final approval will be sought in 1983 with the
appropriate cost sharing to be approved at that time.
As such, we' recommend giving preliminary approval to the plans subject to
a correction on the plan. The correction being the reduction of right -of -way
for the north frontage road from fifty feet (50') to forty feet (40') in the
Edina portion. I will have a plan map available at the Council meeting for
your review.
The second part of this memorandum concerns other major metropolitan
improvements as the improvements relate to Edina. Attached is a metro map
depicting the major projects for the 1983 -85 Transportation Improvement
Program. The two projects which will impact the City of Edina are the
following:
A. Crosstown 62 improvement from approximately County Road 18 to I -494.
It is programmed to start construction in 1984 depending availability
of FAU Funding.
Page II
Subject: France Avenue /I -494 Project and other major Metro Transportation Projects
B. Improvement of Highway 100 and West 36th Street in St. Louis Park.
This location currently has a traffic signal at 100 and a major
bottleneck. This project is ready for bids, but at this time the
funding is not available. It is anticipated that FAU or Federal
Interstate Substitution funding will be available in the next three
years for the project.
I bring those projects to your attention for informational purposes only.
Attachment I
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
co
320 Washington Av. South Z
W ,1
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
'YNE50,
HENNEPIN
L.J 935 -3381
November 9, 1982
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
CSAH 17 AT I -494
S.P. 27- 617 -09; M 5024( ) 1
HENNEPIN COUNTY PROJECT 7927 `ij
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Attached is one co f _
copy o Layout No. 3 and the profiles for the CSAH 17 /I 494
interchange revision. The layout assumes that the development of this
property in the northwest quadrant will be advanced to a stage where the
geometrics shown will be feasible. The "flap" shows the geometrics in the
event development has not advanced to that stage.
The estimated cost of the project, including right of way, is $4,175,000.
This cost is broken down as follows:
The estimated cost for construction of the bridge, ramps, loops,
and modifications to I -494 is $2,750,000. The estimated cost for
construction on CSAH 17 is $750,000 within the Bloomington limits
and $75,000 within the Edina limits. The estimated right of way
cost is $600,000.
This project is currently programmed for an early 1984 letting. In order to
expedite this schedule, we are requesting your early review and approval by
formal council action.
Si rycere
Vern G-en "ger' P. E.
Chief, D -sign Division
VG/ DWS:Iar
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
Attachment II
F /y4/RE S
MAJOR PROJECTS IN ?HE
somovoeiuvie ,tadoWAV cew- SMAC710N
O iv��cva�v�s
rR4oW1. -wa v
A BUS �rARAS. E
IP
Exis� kloux pdi mn Hig,vvys
W- Movounw I-=«�ws
=/
CIS
�r �
- -
`NC`TC.
..d5HI iN
=/
CIS
�r �
mm"""'
"EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612- 927 -8861
Mr. Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
A606 Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Attention: Marie A. Kunze
Dear Vern:
Enclosed herewith is a copy -of the resolution adopted by the Edina City
Council designating properties listed in your letter of November 16,
1982 as Non - Conservation and For Sale.
Please call me if all is not in order.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure (1)
i
December 9, 1982
tMC.IT Y OF
"EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612- 927 -8861
RF.S0T.T1TT0N
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County
of Hennepin a list of land in said municipality which became the property
of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of the following properties:
Plat
Parcel
Property I.D.
73971
4000
28- 117 -21 -21 -0024
76941
6005
29- 117 -21 -43 -0047
77770
3100
32- 117 -21 -41 -0045
WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said lists have heretofore been
classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota,
as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized
by said Board of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 282, that the said classification by said Board of County
Commissioners of each parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved, and
that the sale.of each such parcel of land be and the same is hereby approved.
ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 6,
1982, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said, City this 8th day of December, 1982.
City Clerk
z
J
li-
0f- lam
'nc� . �.�J a v C� 1 ✓h ro J E- 4?^jp `O 4- a-✓► J-
a r i J ?-4-4P- s r V7 o
� f
U 5-e b � Se i -P �.► -�a,� j y
y � r
CCs' 7 [tJ �� fJ -elf+ . r� - r_•j� --�' f� -Ik S
r C-4 .1 j m ro I/ IQ- C4,
u
JD,
C
G
U
i
L�
v n s'1 c 421"
U
-
f
-kA
--L '' U�'1 5� i v vC J 4�1 � (o► Y �" OC. I� � S
a
75 v P
l I
r,
CITY OF 9HH
EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
RESOLUTION
MUNICIPAL STATE AID 5 -YEAR PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has programmed its estimated annual construction
allotment for the next five years; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation State Aid Division
requests an updated plan for Edina's anticipated State Aid expenditures;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby
approve the proposed projects to be constructed over the next five years.
ADOPTED this 6th day of December, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December
6, 1982, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of December,,1:982.,
i
City Clerk J
c^h _
P
v
�`: /s � / %�4C,��C��l ��.`ia� _ Dohs. / /- UC�i�✓�-
/ J
�I 1�� �r �c✓�G'r �.,��� G��c� s� cl'o? - -
Il
J Rio° -
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANCIS HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINEER ��6111el_
VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: 5 YEAR MUNICIPAL STATE AID PLAN
Attached is the memorandum from the State Aid Division of MNDOT
requesting an updated 5 year State Aid expenditure plan. Our pro-
posed five year plan is attached and covers the programmed estimate
of funds that will be available to us over the next five years.
We last submitted a plan to the State Aid Division in 1978. We
accomplished fourteen of the nineteen projects that we had programmed
in 1978. The remaining five projects were re- programmed for construct-
ion during the next five years.
FJH:lm
12/3/82
OANESOT4
y0
� a
Ftir yQ°
OF TaQl�
Minnesota
Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Phone 612- 296 -9372
November 17, 1982
TO Municipal Engineers
FROM Cordon M. Fay, Director
SUBJECT: Continuation of the 5 -Year Construction Program Reporting
The Municipal Screening Committee at its October 19 and 20, 1982 meeting
considered the present directive which states that:
By January 1, 1983, each municipality shall submit_ a revised
5-year construction program which has been approved by their
city council. This pro, ^ram shall include sufficient projects
to utilize all e.xisLing and anticipated funds accruing during
the life of the program. the program, will be u�;clated at 3-
-:ear. intervals and a reviLw made at that time to ascerta.i.n
prn rarr, implc!-<<en tat ion.
Li r:'qui.rea;ents were reviewed and it was determined 10iat_ this irifo,:mation
is valuable to the unencumbered Construction Fund Subcommittee, as well as,
useful to tl':e City Engineers in making the city councils more aware of State
Aid funding.
To comply with this dirr!cti.v_-, each city is requested to submit a council -
approved, itemized 5 -year program of proposed construction by priority,
sllor,ir•,,; the termini, length, estimated cost, and type of anticipated pro-
jects on tike Enclosed forms. Include onl,� State Aid expenditures in this
report.
This submittal should be returned to the District State Aid Engineer by
January 1, 1933.
We are returning a corky of your previous 5•iear construction program to
those critics which sull witted a report in 1':"79. These rcoorts could be help-
ful in preparing this year's .uomittal.
S.uruo�r ti: Fay, Direct-Jr
Office of State Aid
Encicc,ure: 1979 `i -Year Construcr..ion Program
An Equal Opportunity Employer
MUNICIPAL
STATE -AID STREET SYSTEM
5 -Year Construction
Program For
(State Aid
Expenditures Only)
REVENUE
Present State Aid Construction Balance June 30, 19 g.2 =
$_± ;Z, 3 7
Estimated
Annual Construction Allotment � �� �13 X 4 =
s a. S' 5',2
Estimated
Total State Aid Allotment for Programming Purposes
, 3 ,5 y J 6 8 9
* Portion
of this expended in 1982
after June 30, 1982
'
ESTIMATED EXPEINDITURES
Year
of
Estimated
Ex penditure
Termini
Project Descriotion
State Aid
Exoenditure
On F rance Avenue ( SAH-17)
1983
From
To
Length Traffic Signal
Traffic Signal
$ 53_,000.00
at Gallagher Drive
On West 70th Street
1983
From
To
Traffic Signal
$ 60 000.00
Length Traffic Signal at
'
Metro Boulevard
on Vernon Avenue
Grading, Base, Bituminous
From Gleason oa7—
Surface, Curb & Gutter,
1983
To Lon on erry ri Ve 7
Storm Sewer Replacement
$ 529,200.00
Length Mies
on Nine Mile Creek,
Sidewalk
0n Hanson Road
Grading, Base, Bituminou
1983
From _Vernon Avenue
Surface, Curb & Gutter,
1
To Benton Avenue
Concrete Sidewalk
$ 232,600.00
Length .42 Mile
on West 50th Street
Storm Sewer, Street
From Dale Avenue
Widening, & Overlay
1983 -84
To Halifax Avenue
Traffic Signal at 50th
$ 216,000.00
Length .80-Mile
and Wooddale
on France (CSAH 17)
Interchange Revision
From
at I -494
1984
To W.
;250,000.00
Length .35-Mile
County Project
ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES
Year
Estimated
of
State Aid e
Exoenditure
Termini
Project Descrintion
Exnenditure
On W. 44th Street
Bridge Replacements on
From T.H. 100
Minnehaha Creek, M.N.& S
1984
To Brooksi a Avenue
Grade, Base, Bituminous
$ 545,000.00
Length .17 Mile
Surface, Curb & Gutter
Concrete Sidewalk
on W.. 69th Street
Bituminous Surface,
From France Avenue
Curb & Gutter,
1985
To Xerxes Avenue
Storm Sewer, Sidewalk
$ 195,000.00
Len -th 1 I e
on Blake Road
Grade, Base, Bituminous
From Vernon Avenue
Surface, Curb & Gutter,
1985
To Inter achen Blvd.
Storm Sewer, Sidewalk
$ 515,000.00
Length 1.12 Miles
on Wooddale Avenue
Grade, Bituminous Surfac
From W. 50th Street
Curb & Gutter, from Towe
,
1986
To Valley View Koad
St. to Valley View
386,290.00
Len -th 1.44 Miles
Concrete Sidewalk W. 50t
St. to Valley View
on Valley View Road
Grade, Base, Bituminous
From Mark Terrace
Surface, Curb & Gutter
1986
To Mc Cauley Trail
164,700.00
Length .50 Mile
on W. 54th Street
Base, Bituminous Surface
From Wooddale Avenue
Curb & Gutter, Sidewalk,'
1987
To France Avenue
Bridge Work
393,000.00
Len -th .50 Mile
on France Avenue
Bituminous Surface,
From Street
Curb & Gutter, Sidewalk
1987
To W. 49th Stre—e-f—
Cooperative Project with
$ 225,000.00
Length 1.00 Mile,
Minneapolis
onInterlachen Blvd.(CSAH)
Grade, Surface, Curb &
From Vernon Avenue 0
Gutter, Sidewalk
Undetermined
To Blake Road
Cooperative Project
$
Length 1.51 Mile
with Hennepin County
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION
F T t•'N
A606 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487
HENNEPIN �N.s
LJ 1J
November 16, 1982
Florence B. Hallberg,'Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
We are listing below the Property Identification numbers of tax forfeited
.parcels in your municipality that, according to our records, have not
been approved for sale. We are requesting that you have the City Council
approve these for public auction, for private sale to adjacent owners if
the parcels cannot be improved because of non - compliance with local
ordinances, or request conveyance.
Plat Parcel Property I.D.
73971 4000 28- 117 -21 -21 -0024
76941 6005 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 g�
77770 3100 32- 117- 21 -41- 0045
According to 1980 Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 1, if the City Council
fails to respond within 90 days of the date of this letter, the sale
will be deemed to be approved.
If we can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact Dennis Morris,
Delinquent Tax and Forfeited Land Section Supervisor, at 348 -5160.
Sincerely,
Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
By
Marie A. Kunze
Property Taxation Manager
Tax Receivables Division
VTH:MAK:sw
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opportunity employer
EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CHANGES IN STATE AID FORMULA
WHEREAS, Minnesota state local government aid to cities was originally distri-
buted on a per capita basis; and
WHEREAS, the current state aid distribution is not equitable in that some
cities receive as much as $122.95 per capita and other cities receive as little
as $11.61 per capita; and
WHEREAS, the State Revenue Department report indicates that "90 percent of the
inequities are caused by the grandfather clause, and the present formula fails to
achieve the purpose of equity; and
WHEREAS, the following revenue sharing mechanisms, which may be duplicative of state
aid, are also available and assist in achieving equity:
(a) Gas tax for cities over 5,000 population;
(b) Fiscal disparities;
(c) Metropolitan Transit Commission;
(d) Federal aid entitlements;
(e) Special local taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT.RESOLVED that the Edina City Council strongly requests and
supports changes in the state aid formula; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council specifically supports/
requests changes that will accomplish the following:
(a) Provide for equitable fund distribution;
(b) Include no grandfather clause;
(c) Provide for periodic review and adjustment to assure the
goal of equity;
(d) Include no incentive for spending;
(e) Provide for distribution on a per capita basis, with cities
receiving a lesser disbursement (as the result of a change
in state aid.formula) given the option /authority to raise a
one percent (1 %) sales tax.
DATED this 6th day of December, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 6, 1982, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
CITY OF
Jq[AEDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
December 8, 1982
Mr. Hank Sinda
City of Savage
12305 Quentin Ave. ,,S.
Savage, MN 55378
Dear Mr. Sinda:
Enclosed herewith is a certified copy of a resolution adopted by the
Edina City Council relative to the change in State Aid Formula.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Accounts Receivable
Contracts Receivable
Loan To Other Funds
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Mix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies Inventory
FIXED ASSETS:
Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Leasehold Improvements
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
As At October 31, 1982
ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
$ 22,136.07
727,488.27
293,719.64
3.035.55
$1,046,379.53
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization 369,528.58
Construction in Progress
TOTAL ASSETS
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
.Accrued Payroll
Due To Other Funds
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
SURPLUS:
Invested in Fixed Assets
Unappropriated
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
$ 309,316.74
3,800.00
$ 481,785.55
302,424.72
79,874.16
$ 313,116.74
1,421.60
49,733.35
415,000.00
864,084.43
$ (3,423.50)
400.00 (3,023.50)
$1,640,332.62
$ 233,784.60
676,850.95
700.00 911,335.55
$2,551,668.17
$ 190,659.98
7,269.23
197,929.21
1.550.00
$ 199,479.21
$ 911,335.55
1,440,853.41 2,352,188.96
$2,551,668.17
is
NET SALES
COST OF SALES:
Inventory - January 1
Purchases
Inventory Oct. 1
254,569.38 394,458.82 275,210.64 924,238.84 266,610.05 334,835.48 257,259.85 858,705.38 12,040.67* 59,623.34 17,950.79 65,533.46
814 416.61 1,552,356.64 1 326 261.18 3,693,034.43 911 888.40 1,845,559.34 1 509 395.48 4,266,843.22 97 471.79* 293,202.70* 183,134.30* 573,808.791k
1,068,985.99 1,946,815.46 1,601,471.82 $4,617,273.27 1,178,498.45 2,180,39 .82 1,766,655.33 5,125,5 8.60 109,512.46* 233,579.36* 165,183.51* 508,275.33*
246.079.94 355.118.30 262.886.19 864.084.43 324.781.69 502.266.81 358.789 ;19 1.185.837.69 78.701.75* 147.148.51 *. 95.903.00* 321,753.26*
GROSS PROFIT $ 173,90738 334,088.33 ,V 264,527.70 $ -172,523.41-$ 157,858.01 $ 309,248.44 $ 234,365.49 $ 701,471.94 $ 16,049.87 $ 24,839.89 $ 30,162.21 71,051.97
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling 58,038.37 101,229.37 82,772.25 242,039.99 57,239.11 102,187.70 85,642.96 245,069.77 799.26 958.33* 2,870.71* 3,029.78*
Overhead 29,836.00 43,649.05 30,264.99 103,750.04 31,177.10 39,991.40 31,109.97 102,278.47 1,341.10* 3,657.65 844.98* 19471.57
Administrative 54,762.75 74 735.36 59,569.95 189,068.06 53,322.75 75,130.57 62,638.80 191,092.12 1,440.00 395.21* 3,068.85* 2,024,06*
TOTAL OPERATING $ 142 637.12 $ 219,613.78 $ 172,607.19 $ 5349858.09 $ 1419738.96 $ 217,309.67 $ 179,391.73 $ 538,440.36 $ 898.16 $ 2,304.11 $ 6,784,54* $ 3,582.27*
EXPENSES
NET OPERATING $ 31,270.76 $ 114,474.55 $ 91,920.51 $ 237,665.82 $ 16,119.05 $ .9 1,938.77 $ 54,973.76 $ 163,031.58 . 15,151.71 $ 22,535.78 $ 36,946.75 $ 74,634.24
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discount 14,750.41 29,824.97 24,193.15 68,768.53 14,358.73 30,292.05 25,992.25 70,643.03 391.68 467.08* 1,799.10* 1,874.50*
Cash over or under 37.86 292.45* 220.33 34.26* 7.84* 462.71* 414.97 55.58* 45.70 170,26 194.64* 21.32
Income on investments -0- -0- .1,594.75 1,594.75 1,594.75* 1,594.75*
Other 556.16 260.05 244.94 1,061.15 537.94 241.17 225.91 1 005.02 18.22 18.88 19.03 56.13
15.344.43 299792.Y7 $ 24,658.42 69.795.42 16,483 58 30,070.51 26 633.13 73 187.22 1,139.15* 277.94* $ 1,974.71- 3,391.80*
NETINCOM E $ 46,615.19 $ 144,267 12 4 116,578.93 307,461.24 $ 32,602.63 $ 122 009.28 $ 81,606,89 $ 236,218.80 S 14,012.56 $ 22,257.84 $ 34,972.04 $ 71,242,44_.
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross profit 17.457. 17.357. 16.50% 17.077. 15.617. 15.56% 14.277 15.117.
Operating expenses 14.31 11.41 10.77 11.82 14.01 10.93 10.92 11.60
Operating profit 3.14% 5.94% 5.73% 5.25% 1.60% 4.63% 3.35% 3.51%
Operatigpr 1.54 1.55 1.54 1.54 1.62 1.51 1.62 1.58
NETINCOM E 4.68% 7.49% 7.27% 6.79% 3.22% 6.14% 4.97% 5.09%
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME
AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
Ten Months
Ending October 31, 1982 and
October 31,
1981
1982
1981
INCREASE- DECREASE•
50th Street
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
50th Street Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
50th Street
Yorkdale
Grandview
Total
SALES:
Liquor
S 491,775.93
S 999,483.38
$ 850,500.39
$2,341,759.70
$ 536,193.12 $1,053,305.83
$ 905,181.51
$2,494,681.06
$ 44,417.79* $
53,822.45* $
54,681.12*
$152,921.36*
Wine
293,375.45
544,311.67
440,331.63
1,278,018.75
288,121.32 544,288.40
422,818.71
1,255,228.43
5,254.13
23.27
17;512.92
22,790.32
Beer
222,952.84
416,976.47
339,866.68
979,795.99
197,644.91 426,259.83
345,371.57
969,276.31
25,307.93
9,283.36*
5,504.89*
10,519.68
Mix andId4celianeous
15 511.45
29 797.71
28 047.02
73 356.18
17 074.40 31,584 * 60
27 906.02
76 565.02
1,562.95*
1,786.89*
141.00
3,208.84*
1,023,615.67
$1,990,569.23
$1,658,745.72
$4,672,930.62
1,039,034.35 $2,055,43866
1,701,277.81
,795,750.82
150418.68* $
6 ,869.43* $
42,532.09*
$122,820.20*
Less bottle refunds
26 801.74
64 .783.74
55 632.39
147 217.87
27 459.58 68 062.21
59,046.18
154,567.97
657.84*
3,278.47*
3,413.79*
7,350.10*
996,813.93
1,925,785.9
1,603,113.33
,525.712.7 5
41,011,574.77 1,987,376.5
§1,642,231.63
1,182.85
14,760.84*
61,590.96*
39,118.30*
115,470.10*
NET SALES
COST OF SALES:
Inventory - January 1
Purchases
Inventory Oct. 1
254,569.38 394,458.82 275,210.64 924,238.84 266,610.05 334,835.48 257,259.85 858,705.38 12,040.67* 59,623.34 17,950.79 65,533.46
814 416.61 1,552,356.64 1 326 261.18 3,693,034.43 911 888.40 1,845,559.34 1 509 395.48 4,266,843.22 97 471.79* 293,202.70* 183,134.30* 573,808.791k
1,068,985.99 1,946,815.46 1,601,471.82 $4,617,273.27 1,178,498.45 2,180,39 .82 1,766,655.33 5,125,5 8.60 109,512.46* 233,579.36* 165,183.51* 508,275.33*
246.079.94 355.118.30 262.886.19 864.084.43 324.781.69 502.266.81 358.789 ;19 1.185.837.69 78.701.75* 147.148.51 *. 95.903.00* 321,753.26*
GROSS PROFIT $ 173,90738 334,088.33 ,V 264,527.70 $ -172,523.41-$ 157,858.01 $ 309,248.44 $ 234,365.49 $ 701,471.94 $ 16,049.87 $ 24,839.89 $ 30,162.21 71,051.97
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling 58,038.37 101,229.37 82,772.25 242,039.99 57,239.11 102,187.70 85,642.96 245,069.77 799.26 958.33* 2,870.71* 3,029.78*
Overhead 29,836.00 43,649.05 30,264.99 103,750.04 31,177.10 39,991.40 31,109.97 102,278.47 1,341.10* 3,657.65 844.98* 19471.57
Administrative 54,762.75 74 735.36 59,569.95 189,068.06 53,322.75 75,130.57 62,638.80 191,092.12 1,440.00 395.21* 3,068.85* 2,024,06*
TOTAL OPERATING $ 142 637.12 $ 219,613.78 $ 172,607.19 $ 5349858.09 $ 1419738.96 $ 217,309.67 $ 179,391.73 $ 538,440.36 $ 898.16 $ 2,304.11 $ 6,784,54* $ 3,582.27*
EXPENSES
NET OPERATING $ 31,270.76 $ 114,474.55 $ 91,920.51 $ 237,665.82 $ 16,119.05 $ .9 1,938.77 $ 54,973.76 $ 163,031.58 . 15,151.71 $ 22,535.78 $ 36,946.75 $ 74,634.24
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discount 14,750.41 29,824.97 24,193.15 68,768.53 14,358.73 30,292.05 25,992.25 70,643.03 391.68 467.08* 1,799.10* 1,874.50*
Cash over or under 37.86 292.45* 220.33 34.26* 7.84* 462.71* 414.97 55.58* 45.70 170,26 194.64* 21.32
Income on investments -0- -0- .1,594.75 1,594.75 1,594.75* 1,594.75*
Other 556.16 260.05 244.94 1,061.15 537.94 241.17 225.91 1 005.02 18.22 18.88 19.03 56.13
15.344.43 299792.Y7 $ 24,658.42 69.795.42 16,483 58 30,070.51 26 633.13 73 187.22 1,139.15* 277.94* $ 1,974.71- 3,391.80*
NETINCOM E $ 46,615.19 $ 144,267 12 4 116,578.93 307,461.24 $ 32,602.63 $ 122 009.28 $ 81,606,89 $ 236,218.80 S 14,012.56 $ 22,257.84 $ 34,972.04 $ 71,242,44_.
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross profit 17.457. 17.357. 16.50% 17.077. 15.617. 15.56% 14.277 15.117.
Operating expenses 14.31 11.41 10.77 11.82 14.01 10.93 10.92 11.60
Operating profit 3.14% 5.94% 5.73% 5.25% 1.60% 4.63% 3.35% 3.51%
Operatigpr 1.54 1.55 1.54 1.54 1.62 1.51 1.62 1.58
NETINCOM E 4.68% 7.49% 7.27% 6.79% 3.22% 6.14% 4.97% 5.09%
lb
o r4
F T
HENNEPIN
[i 1J
Vl.(r-r. - -� I-e--t --t� �� A_
DEPARTMENT OF PROPERTY TAXATION �•'"
A606 Government Center z <
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 �11 ES ' `'Ei
November 16, 1982
Florence B. Hallberg,
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
ZrI51 t"�
Clerk
We are listing below the Property Identification numbers of tax forfeited
parcels in your municipality that, according to our records, have not
been approved for sale. We are requesting that you have the City Council
approve these for public auction, for private sale to adjacent owners if
the parcels cannot be improved because of non - compliance with local
ordinances, or request conveyance.
Plat Parcel Property I.D. e� 3
73971 4000 28- 117 -21 -21 -0024 �� � <,L d 116
76941 6005 29- 117 -21 -43 -0047 2r�'��,] �
77770 3100 32- 117 -21 -41 -0045 ,
GPI i', NI • N �' 't-G�� �• J Q
According to 1980 Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 1, if the City Council
fails to respond within 90 days of the date of this letter, the sale
will be deemed to be approved.
If we can be of'any help to you, please feel free to contact Dennis Morris,
Delinquent Tax and Forfeited Land Section Supervisor, at 348 -5160.
Sincerely,
Vernon T. Hoppe
Director of Property Taxation
"u-111 ?
By
Marie A. Kunze
Property Taxation Manager
Tax Receivables Division
VTH:MAK:sw
�S
3
HENNEPIN COUNTY
an equal opporfunlfy employer
�� 1, - ,j. 1 • ' 1. It ( i J ( � / 1
A - ' V , c , J _J _ r� -J P l
JGQRRY RD -
- - -- E A S T LAKE /I
�
C)
O Q ' /
- C)ONCASTER
vi AN
R0SENDAH .7 N- 2nd x ' ADD /T /ON
Ys
ED/NA o': H /GfiLDfNOS J U
- - - - - -_ .- �' _.' ? L_.l- - `.G —{ yr• __ -
LOT
- `)CHI _OY p R A
,./ - - --
�JC V'
m
YJ.
. .,, }O '� % i. • _ � ' � \tea ,. J %
,
� - In tu
uJ 106.67
lco 511)
af
31d 39 3o 29 Z8
j.
co
oi 49
7171 (73 CIA
N.
-LOT 49
91 4 5.5Z
7o w
oel
ce
(:OUNTRYSIDE ROAD 0 74Z..441
' LL 4
cr
`^
'
�
41 A.d Sub'd No 176
9
2f
2�M - r
z
NCH � 3.
17
4
2
5
L Z
1. 15
4 6
L a).
_'4 4
::S' .99 04 5,- 2
66 2 4.
C C�l 6 8
2 IC)
L
44th OUTLOT I
J
3, s 97
, e
41 13 m
286.3 C1462.13 V t /V A trA
_757 6_�
290.25 s S7
27 5
0
12 Of
3
0, 6
4 ^ 13 7 10
rn MC
5
8
14
1 6 29
W ,-
7 9 fn
30
oi _7
9. 3b2" K S, 1,!YE
Ii. 1 31 0
D <
1, b 16
ITI 0 U, v --- 16
i%)
17
9) 32
(D
2 M, 4-
w_
N 1/4 Cor
4-
3o
S.W.Cor.Sec.7
N.W.Cor Sec 18
30 419
16
I8
17
-19
ST. 4-- - 41,
ITT, 2
T
2 + D DID.
�� 7"1 50
7
,0
4 2
-0 II
oil
ORE AVE. 17
12
14 C:
<
A7
6, m
-�o
VA
ST.
33
8
24 I
I
AU D. SUB.
34
7
<
V)
23 2
21 20 19 44
m >
t
22 3
No. 176
35
AUD SUB No.176
6
k,
"
Z1
LOT a - ;I".
\ 3
1,q,
I ,
5
-41
4
GMHCo
Mayor and City Council
City of Edina
4801 West Fiftieth Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Councilmembers:
GEORGE M. HANSEN COMPANY, P.A.
A Professional Corporation of Certified Public Accountants
November 26, 1982
I wish to thank you for the opportunity to have served you these past six years
as auditors for the City of Edina.
I have enjoyed working with your staff, and we are always available to answer
any questions you or staff members may have.
I am a resident of Edina, and would be pleased if you would consider me for
any committee appointment that may arise.-
JGM:hj
Very truly yours,
"r --qv-� X�"4
J. Gregory Murphy
175 SOUTH PLAZA BUILDING WAYZATA BOULEVARD AT HIGHWAY 100 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55416 612/54S-2566
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Florence Hallberg
Subject: Retirement Party for Otto Bang
Date: November 18, 1982
Donna Skagerberg asked me to ask you to save January 13, 1983, for a
retirement party for Otto Bang which will be held at the Sofetel.
They will be sending invitations closer to that date but she wanted
you all to be sure to save the evening.
INCOME:
Memberships
Registration
Donations
Merchandise
Less: Cost
ART CENTER FUND
Statement of Income and Expense
City of Edina
Nine months ending September 30, 1982
and September 30, 1981
1982 1981
Fees
Sales
of Merchandise Sold
Art Work Sold
Other
Total Income
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Personal Services:
Administrative
Instructors
Maintenance
Dues and Subscriptions
Advertising
Light and Power
Telephone
Heat
Rubbish Removal
Printing
Insurance and Alarm Service
General Supplies
Central Services
Audit
Class Costs
Repairs
Other
Sewer & Water
Total Operating Expense
Increase
Decrease*
Profit (Loss) Before Depreciation
Provision for Depreciation
Net Profit (Loss)
*17,500.00
Handicap Access
MN 10/29/82
mk
$ 883.58 $ 97.49 $ 786.09
1,098.22 987.78 110.44
53,301.13 $ 37,403.50 $ 15,897.63
now-way
�.
25,867.42
:
.
;•
11.599-87
Profit (Loss) Before Depreciation
Provision for Depreciation
Net Profit (Loss)
*17,500.00
Handicap Access
MN 10/29/82
mk
$ 883.58 $ 97.49 $ 786.09
1,098.22 987.78 110.44
53,301.13 $ 37,403.50 $ 15,897.63
11 � 5. 00 illi
1,687.31 1,045.14 •4
4,292.63 ,0
•. .56 1,095.17 201.39
588.86 131.30 457.56
445.00 325.00 00
5,279.95 2,977.78 2a302-1Z
423.92 435.73 11,al*
164.89 964.24 799.35*
2,835.00 2,520.00 315,00
100.00 100.00
357.85
_ :0
4 00 •0
48.50 40.50 8.00
62,843.60 $ 45,691.15 17,152.45
$ (9,542.47) $ "(8,287.65) $ 1,254.82
$ 967.50 967.50 -0-
$(10,509:97) $ (9,255.15) $ 1,254.82
now-way
�.
11 � 5. 00 illi
1,687.31 1,045.14 •4
4,292.63 ,0
•. .56 1,095.17 201.39
588.86 131.30 457.56
445.00 325.00 00
5,279.95 2,977.78 2a302-1Z
423.92 435.73 11,al*
164.89 964.24 799.35*
2,835.00 2,520.00 315,00
100.00 100.00
357.85
_ :0
4 00 •0
48.50 40.50 8.00
62,843.60 $ 45,691.15 17,152.45
$ (9,542.47) $ "(8,287.65) $ 1,254.82
$ 967.50 967.50 -0-
$(10,509:97) $ (9,255.15) $ 1,254.82
GOLF COURSE FUND
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
For Nine Months Ending September 30, 1982 and
September 30, 1981
REVENUE
Membership Fees
Green Fees:
18 holes
9 holes
Par 3
Golf car, cart & Club rental
Locker Rental
Golf Lessons
Other
OPERATING EXPENSES
Administration
Salaries and Wages:
Manager
Pro
Rangers and Starters
Cashiers & Clerical
Printing and Advertising
Golf Car Rental
Supplies
Insurance and Alarm System
Retirement, Insurance, Office
Supplies, etc.
Itileage and schools
Audit
Other
Total Administration
Building - Clubhouse and Pro Shop
Salaries and Wages
Telephone
Water
Fuel
Light and Power
Laundry
30% Less: Amount charged to Grille
Repairs - building
Insurance
Supplies
Other
INCREASE
1982 1981 DECREASE*
$ 42,703 11 Z; 37 869.46 4 4,833.65
0,195.00 27,900.00 2,295.00
5 . 0 643.50 71.80*
00.00 800.00 -0-
1,190.61 1,078.56*
$ 10 ,120.43 $ 9,788.93
442.16
9
365 66 8.923 -5n*
1,357.17
2
593 27 1.216 -1n*
366.60
9 788.45 1
607 77 241 -17*
2,401.66
2
029 20 .172 -46
11,909.39
1,158.61
_. 10,648.87
1.373.01
1.260.52
214 -4n*
(5 158 03)
(5
175 64) 17 -61
4,097.96
1
790.61 2 307.35
-0-
-0- -n-
1,8 94
3
038 24 1,222.30*
3,250.00
2
154 88 1,095.12
Total Building - Clubhouse
and Pro Shop $ 21,641.46 $ 28,425.87 $ 6,784.41*
Maintenance of Course and Grounds
Salaries and Wages:
Superintendent
Maintenance
Golf Car Maintenance
Irrigation System
Telephone
Light and Power
Fuel
Fertilizer and Chemicals
Sand, gravel and rock
Concrete and asphalt
Sod, tree replacement, etc.
Lumber
Repairs
Supplies
Equipment Operation
Golf Car Maintenance
Irrigation System
Other
Total Maintenance of
Course and Grounds
Total Operating Expenses
Total Operating Income
L
$ 23,019.02 S
S 21,742.97 $
$ 1.276.05
65,796.63 5
52,193.64 1
13 602.99
7,883.93 9
9 788.45 1
1,904.52*
6,410.06 7
7,190.21 7
780.15*
103,109.64 9
90,915.27 $
$ 12,194.37 b
b 60 6 2
2.08 1
1,478.61
62 4
489 04 2
229. R
$ 192,226.47 $152 416 54 $ 39.8nQ -93-
$ 327,777 29 284 962 R4 42 R1a a�
$ 138,4Y9.63 4143 082 88 ---L ILL
GOLF COURSE FUND (con't)
INCREASE
DECREASE*
Income on Investments -n- -n-
Net Income - Operating Department 65 386.98 52,703.50 12.683__48
$ 65,386.98 52,703.50 $ 12,683.48
Income Before Interest and
Depreciation
Interest on Bonds
Interest on Loan - Liquor Fund
Total Interest
Income Before Depreciation
Provision for Depreciation
Net Income
Range
Income
Less: Operating Expenses
Net Income - Range
Grille
Income
Less: Operating Expenses
Personal Services
Contractual Services
Commodities
Net Income - Grille
Net Income - Operating
Departments
MN 11/8/82
mk
$
203,886. 61
$ 195,786.38
$ 8.100.23
6,796.80
8.496.00
1.699.2n*
-0-
-0-
-n-
$ 8,49E nn
1 600 gn*
$
197 089 81
$ 187 29n 38
$ 4,700 ag
$
16 542 00
$ 14,a32 no
$ 1 -71n nn
$
180 547 81
$ 179 458 3R
$ a_na0 as
$ 86,106.03 74 136 79 11 269 31
33,223
52,882- 7 066 32
89,801 00 8,a,2n1 a5 Soo 55
26 416 55 27,440 67 1,024 12*
5 158 03 5,175-64 17 61 *_
45 722.38 44,698-20 1,024.12
77,296 96 77 314
$ 12,504 04 $ 6 886 94 $ 5.617 -1n
$ 65,386 98 52,703-5 12.68,2 48
RECREATION CENTER FUND
STATE1,1ENT OF INC0ME AND EXPENCE
CITY OF EDINA
For Nine Months Ending and
September 30, 1981
REVENUE
Season tickets
Retail sales
Concessions
Daily skating fees
Spectator fees
Ice Rental
Services - Skate Sharpening
Vending machine commisssion
Skate & Locker Rental
Other
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries and wages
Manager
City clerical, cashiers & ticket
Police takers
Maintenance
Organist
Concession labor
Total Salaries and Wages
Mileage and conferences
Printing - tickets, notices
Laundry
Telephone
Light and power
Fuel and heat
Rubbish Hauling
Cleaning Supplies
Lumber & Paint
General supplies & �uilding
Equipment/ maintenanc
Central services
Food & soft drinks purchased
Insurance & alarm
Audit
Other
Total Contractual Services
and Commodities
Total Operating Expenses
INCOPdE BEFORE INTEREST AND
DEPRECIATION (LOSS)
Interest on bonds
Interest on loan - Liquor Fund
TOTAL INTEREST
INCOP.E ( LOSS) BEFORE DEPRECIATION]
Provision for depreciation
NET INCOME (LOSS)
MN 11/1/82
mk
INCREASE
2.10 [sts.W
$ $ $ '
$ 19,196 67 16 100 80 3 085 87
3,851. 45 3 871 54 20 -09*
0 630 00 630 -00*
49 979 21 59 5390_ 9 559.89*
765.00 945 -00 180.nn*
1 62574 2 727 17 1 101 93 *_
$ 7R ail 57 $ 83.813 61 $ 8.396.Q4*
$ 134,998.85 $ 159 009.54 $ 24 010.69*
210,416.42 242 823.15 b 32 406.73*
$ (33 095 51) 1, (85,863.97) $ 52,768.46*
2,340.00 2 988.00 648.00*
-0- -0- -0-
2,340.00 $ 2,988.00 V 648.00*
35 435 51 5 8 851.97 5 53,416.46*
1,766.25 2,115.00 348.75*
0 37,201./b) b 90 966 97 ' 531765.21*
Home of Dan Patch
MEMO
CITY of SA VA GE
12305 QUENTIN AVE. SO.
SAVAGE, MINNESOTA 55378 CITY HALL 612/890 -1045
December 2, 1982
TO: Members of the Metropolitan Losers" Group
FROM: Hank Sinda
RE: Lobbying for Change in State Aid Formula
The Losers' Group met on Tuesday, November 30, and by concensus
agreed to formally organize the group by establishing officers and
a budget to cover expenses (clerical, typing, postage, etc.)
The purpose of the organization, as you know, is to deal with the
inequities of fiscal disparities and state aid. In order for us
to continue in that pursuit, we are requesting that each city
contribute dues in the amount of $100 per year. The objective is
not to build a long lasting, ongoing organization, but to disband
after achieving our goals. We appreciate your assistance in this
effort.
Secondly, please ask your council to review and adopt the sample
resolution that is enclosed. As you may well understand, provisions
of this resolution are,not "cast in stone," nor do they represent the
precise opinion of each member city. They do, however, represent a
starting position for negotiation with the Legislature.
It is important that these resolutions be returned to us by Dec. 31,
1982 so that they may be used as a tool to take to the Legislature.
We ask, also, that group members sit down with senators and
representatives in their district, show them the resolution, explain
the problems at hand, and ask for their support.
The Losers' Group will soon make arrangements to have a bill drafted.
We, along with representatives from the Association of Small Cities,
will then schedule a special lobbying breakfast in January, a unique
opportunity to muster the support of legislators while introducing the
bill.
For utmost effect, it is imperative that each city send representatives
to the breakfast and, prior to that, do whatever possible to solicit
attendance and support of district legislators. Additional information
in regard to the breakfast will be forthcoming.
If you know of any legislators willing to sponsor or co- sponsor such a
bill, please let us know. Please call my office if there are any
questions, and I would be happy to discuss them with you.
r
T0: Metropolitan Losers' Group and Association
of Small Cities
DATE: December 1, 1982
RE: League of Minnesota Cities State Aid Legislative Policy
The Metropolitan Losers' Group and the Association of Small Cities
have been working through the committee system of the League of
Minnesota Cities to gain support for changes that will make the
state aid formula more equitable. The lobbying efforts of the
League of Minnesota Cities would be vital in gaining the necessary
legislative changes.
The issue has been raised and acted upon by the Revenue Resource
Committee. By a vote of 14 to 6, this committee recommended that
the state aid formula be changed. Several options, based on per
capita and need, were then reviewed, but the committee was unable
to reach a decision as to how the formula should be changed.
The recommendation of the Revenue Resource Committee, to change the
state aid formula, was then forwarded to the League of Minnesota
Cities Board of Directors. At this level the committee decision
was reversed, and the existing LMC policy was stressed - -no
legislative change is to be considered until it has been first
reviewed and approved by the League.
It appears that the board decision was based, not so much on the
merits of the recommended change, but on the issue itself. From the
viewpoint of members of the board, the matter is too hot, too volatile,
and a delve into change threatens to split the League of Minnesota
Cities. This, they feel, would be detrimental to all cities.
The issue will be brought to the League of Minnesota Cities legislative
conference to be held January 26, 1983 in St. Paul. The purpose
of the conference is for the general membership to change or ratify
the recommendations of the Board of Directors.
Without question the existing state aid formula is inequitable, and
affected cities must be persistant in a quest for a change that is
equitable. It-is of vital importance that every city be present at
the January 26 conference to vote for a change in the state aid
formula.
Your vote, and the assistance of any other city that you may be able
to contact and influence, will be greatly appreciated and can have
a great impact.
P.S. Legislative lobbying efforts are included in another memo.
f
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CHANGES IN STATE AID FORMULA
WHEREAS, Minnesota state local government aid to cities was originally
distributed on a per capita basis; and
WHEREAS, the current state aid distribution is not equitable in that
some cities receive as much as $122.95 per capita, and other cities
receive as little as $11.61 per capita; and
WHEREAS, the State Revenue Department report indicates that "90 percent
of the inequities are caused by the grandfather clause, and the present
formula fails to achieve the purpose of equity;' and
WHEREAS, the following revenue sharing mechanisms, which may be
duplicative of state aid, are also available and assist in achieving
equity:
(a) Gas- tax for cities over 5000 population;
(b) Fiscal disparities;
(c) Metropolitan Transit Commission;
(d) Federal aid entitlements;
(e) Special local taxes.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of strongly
requests and supports changes- in the state aid formula.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of' specifically
supports /requests changes that will accomplish the following:
(a) Provide for equitable fund distribution;
(b) Include no grandfather clause;
(c) Provide for periodic review and adjustment to
assure the goal of equity;
(d) Include no incentive for spending;
(e) Provide for distribution on a per capita basis,
with cities receiving a lessor disbursement (as
the result of a change in state aid formula) given
the option /authority to raise a one percent (1 %)
sales tax.
Adopted by the Mayor and Council of the City of this
day of 0 19
l rbialativr Analvsts
i Karen m Baker
Ataurren Belles
James O Clears
Care R Curne
Donna C Fall,
Ae•rs I:rnnes Fine
Jr...n Costosrch
ar-ha C.onsr•th
1c. -in HvIlane
Ste p hen U Hiri e
Alan R Hopeman
Stan Jacobson
Kathrsn Lamp
Deborah K McKnight
Joel T Michael
Samuel W Rankin
Douglas P Seaton
F mils Shapiro
Mark Shepard
Thomas M Todd
John Williams
TO:
i r III If
House of Representatives
RESEARCH DEPARTMENT I -�`'
17 STATE t APITOL
ST PAUL ii1SS
(h12129b -67S) CI
1 -} s _ Lbrec t6'
- - Prtrr B Lrsir-
November 10, 1982
Members of the Local Government Policy Task Force
FROM: Steve Hinze, Legislative Analyst
RE: Assumption for Property Tax Simulation
Assume all conditions are the same as for actual payable 1986, except:
1) School Maintenance mill rate reduced from 24 to 15 EARC mills.
2) 18 mill ag aid rate reduced to 15 mills. 10 and 8 mill rates reduced
to 7.mills.
3) Homestead Credit percentage reducer from 58% to 45 %.
4) Current $240 million Local Government Aid eliminated. Assume cities,
counties, and towns levy to make up the difference.
Associate Dirrctar
Thomas m Todd
Legal Servrcea Coordinato-
loel.T Michael
Legis:a -i a Assistant
Karin Johnson
5) New Local Government Equalization Aid programs established. Formula
amounts total $232 million for cities, $94 million for counties. Assume
city and county levies are reduced by aid amount.
Equalization Aid formulas
Cities:
First class $483
Non -Metro over 1,000 $267
Other metro $189
Other non -metro $184
Counties:
x population x 60% - (Eq. Ass. Val) x 15 mills = Aid
$295 x population x 45% - (Eq. Ass. Val) x 15 mills = Aid
Members of the Local Government Policy Task Force November 10, 1982
Page 2
6) Alternative tax treatment of farm homesteads: Farm house (and surrounding
acre of land) assessed in the same way (and at same rates) as non -farm house.
No ag aid on'farm house. Homestead credit continues to be paid on basis
of entire homestead (farm house plus contiguous farm land).
7) Classification ratios of homesteads (including farm homestead houses only)
dropped from 16% to 15% on first $27,000 in value, 22% to 20% on next $27,000
in value. No change in upper bracket (28% on value over $54,000).
Wore on simulati_nn restil.rs:
Due to our inability to model exactly the proposed system, farm homestead credit
amounts are underestimated slightly, resulting in slightly overstated farm
homesteat net tax burdens. The problem does not affect any other property
types.
-FoTi4e ;7— Gge - Q C—Vr QtiWT ALL-c`.f �-i'lm 5
/76'm,zc rati
Mill Rate and Local Aid Report
for Peggy Flecker
Actual 1982 Aid
ANOKA
Voss
Proposed 1982 Aid
Anoka
759,502
355,242
Bethel
12,575
17,365
Andover
111,745
400,387
Centerville
19,921
26,531
Columbia Heights
1,288,917
559,824
Circle Pines
154,658
143,263
Fridley
1,353,332
4,084
Lexington
99,710
19,896
Coon Rapids
1,622,731
1,383,650
Ramsey
142,044
376,797
Lino Lakes
152,063
154,092
East Bethel
104,151
315,668
Hilltop
40,176
40,662
St. Francis
38,718
15,756
Ham Lake
140,708
292,816
Blaine (Anoka)
907,357
456,130
Spring Lake Park (Anoka)
162,177
242,983
CARVER
Carver
23,007
30,743
Chaska
194,589
200,779
Cologne
25,023
17,087
Hamburg
21,644
18,137
Mayer
18,061
17,326
New Germany
11,166
20,542
Norwood
62,858
56,553
Victoria
42,730
24,514
Waconia
158,048
43,098
Watertown
94,680
96,414
Young America
59,013
53,002
Chanhassen (Carver)
174,329
-0-
DAKOTA
Coates
3,863
2,448
Farmington
228,034
99,401
Hampton
12,620
5,990
Inver Grove Heights
499,265
490,713
Lakeville
421�1p8
415,362
Mendota
7 889933
-0-
New Frier
2,853
7,492
Randolph
6,493
22,586
Rosemount
174,612
-0-
South St. Paul
1,372,447
755,947
Vermillion
6,913
20,547
West St. Paul
888,722
-0-
Mill Rate and Local Aid Report
-2-
HENNEPIN
Brooklyn Center
1,446,798
Voss
Champlin
Actual 1982 Aid
Proposed 1982 Aid
DAKOTA (CONTINUED)
1,097,157
963,677
Lilydale
7,205
-0-
Miesoille
3,382
1,647
Mendota Heights
223,389
-0-
Sunfish Lake
4,924
-0-
Burnsville
1,144,335
-0-
Apple Valley
545,289
455,926
Eagan
316,893
-0-
Hastings (Dakota)
820,832
337,895
Northfield (Dakota)
68
1,274
HENNEPIN
Brooklyn Center
1,446,798
-0-
Champlin
262,489
364,637
Crystal
1,097,157
963,677
Deephaven
142,097
-0-
Edina
903,079
-0-
Excelsior
143,173
-0-
Golden Valley
1,037,203
-0-
Hopkins
771,103
-0-
Long Lake
68,408
-0-
Loretto
20,945
8,801
Maple Plain
58,457
-0-
114innetonka Beach
333,478
-0-
Mound
280,638
54,884
Osseo
90,433
76,805
Richfield
2,197,894
700,412
Robbinsdale
774,573
357,989
Rogers
21,014
-0-
St. Bonifacius
20,510
15,862
St. Louis Park
1,875,165
-0-
Spring Park
45,814
-0-
Tonka Bay
50,345
-0-
Wayzata
106,339
-0-
Medicine Lake
7,959
-0-
Woodland
9,880
-0-
Bloomington
2,749,117
-0-
New Hope
851,857
389,045
Maple Grove
461,320
-0-
Medina
81,462
-0-
Orono
210,656
-0-
Plymouth
533,364
-0-
Brooklyn Park
1,394,568
1,086,813
Greenwood
18,842
-0-
Minnetonka
1,630,235
-0-
Shorewood
149,625
-0-
Independence
45,476
26,191
Greenfield
19,045
24,603
Corcoran
54,953
139,756
Hinnetuista
152,894
-0-
Eden Prairie
401,950
-0-
Mill Rate and Local Aid Report
-3-
RMISEY
New Brighton
642,542
Voss
North St. Paul
Actual 1982 Aid
Proposed 1982 Aid
HENNEPIN (CONTINUED)
640,685
-0-
Chanhassen (Hennepin)
3,492
-0-
Dayton (Hennepin)
57,454
188,687
Hanover (Hennepin)
4,922
8,859
Rockford (Hennepin)
22,526
20,274
Minneapolis
44,484,231
66,388,542
St. Anthony (Hennepin)
148,352
-0-
RMISEY
New Brighton
642,542
443,180
North St. Paul
435,406
430,180
Roseville
640,685
-0-
Falcon Heights
161,810
100,734
Lauderdale
47,662
-0-
Arden Hills
149,937
-0-
Little Canada
213,454
-0-
North Oaks
38,458
-0-
Maplewood
1,012,142
-0-
Shoreview
450,243
105,990
Vadnais Heights
143,087
64,317
Mounds View
455,862
482,894
Gem Lake
4,130
-0-
Blaine (Ramsey)
1,655
-0-
Spring Lake Park (Ramsey)
3,393
25194
St. Paul
265175,537
48,461,579
St. Anthony (Ramsey)
74,089
-0-
White Bear Lake
7945841
7955476
SCOTT
Belle Plaine
159,502
85,695
Elko
5,275
11,541
Jordan
153,229
121,633
New Market
9,217
10,910
Prior Lake
206,564
-0-
Savage
108,402
-0-
Shakopee
345,452
-0-
New Progue (Scott)
345,452
24,331
WASHINGTON
Afton
44,094
-0-
Bayport
110,649
84,971
Birchwood
25,203
-0-
Dellwood
26,575
-0-
Forest Lake
283,890
22,254
Hugo
70,663
113,206
Lake Elmo
108,947
79,764
Lakeland Shore
1,591
-0-
1.1a}itomedi
143,6.:9
60,6SS
Marine on St. Croix
14,0'4
-f)-
l
[Mill Rate and Local Aid Report
-4-
WRIGHT
2 Cities -0- -0-
Voss
Actual 1982 Aid
Proposed 1982 .aid
WASHINGTON (CONTINUED)
,
Newport
209,354
56,555
St. Paul Park
228,913
173,826
Landfall
19,241
67,277
Stillwater
724,863
274,092
Willernie
28,807
32,748
Oak Park Heights
73,203
-0-
St. Marys Point
5,808
1,858
Lakeland
23,048
43,377
Lake St. Croix Beach
20,435
47,410
Pine Springs
2,728
-0-
Cottage Grove
820,591
470,555
Woodbury
334,204
-0-
Oakdale
442,767
551,902
Hastings (Washington)
2,035
-0-
White Bear Lake (Washington)
3,463
-0-
WRIGHT
2 Cities -0- -0-
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
CARS.
BIDS CLOSE NOVEMBER 18, 1982
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers, Edina City
Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, November 18, 1982, and
the Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, December 6, 1982,
at the City Hall to consider bids being for the following, but not limited to:
Full Sized Sedans for Police Usage
Compact- Intermediate Sedans
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the items
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Clerk, City of Edina,
4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Clerk. Bids received by the City Clerk, either through
the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may
be returned unopened.
Bids must be in conformance with specifications which are available at the
Edina City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by
cash deposit, bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of amount of net bid. The City Council
reserves the right to reject any or all bids or any part of any bid, and will
accept the bid that is deemed to be in the best interest of the City.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Florence B. Hallberg
City Clerk
Please publish in the Edina Sun on November 3, 1982.
Please send us two affadavits of publication.
IV B
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FRANCIS HOFFMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS "1 ;'l°`
VIA: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: DUMP TRUCK BID
We have met with representatives of the Astleford Company (low bidders) and
it is clear that they still contend the issue of the dump box. Our specifications
were and are good specifications, but I understnad their contentions on the
hoist for the dump box.
At this point, it seems appropriate to reject their bid because the equip-
ment they wish to supply does not meet the intent of our specifications..
Also, because of the issue of clarity on the hoist portion of the specification,
we recommend rejecting all bids and re -bid with a change of specification on
the hoist. We would also require anyone wishing to supply an "or" equal"
product to pre - qualify their product before bid opening.
FJH:Im
12/3/82
ma',
E ®Inl�1
'1801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF CHANGES IN STATE AID FORMULA
WHEREAS, Minnesota state local government aid to cities was originally distri-
buted on a per capita basis; and
WHEREAS, the current state aid distribution is not equitable in that some
cities receive as much as $122.95 per capita and other cities receive as little
as $11.61 per capita; and
WHEREAS, the State Revenue Department report indicates that "90 percent of the
inequities are caused by the grandfather clause, and the present formula fails to
achieve the purpose of equity; and
WHEREAS, the following revenue sharing mechanisms, which may be duplicative of state
aid, are also available and assist in achieving equity:
(a) Gas tax for cities over 5,000 population;
(b) Fiscal disparities;
(c) Metropolitan Transit Commission;
(d) Federal aid entitlements;
(e) Special local taxes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council strongly requests and
supports changes in the state aid formula; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council specifically supports/
requests changes that will accomplish the following:
(a) Provide for equitable fund distribution;
(b) Include no grandfather clause;
(c) Provide for periodic review and adjustment to assure the
goal of equity;
(d) Include no incentive for spending;
(e) Provide for distribution on a per capita basis, with cities
receiving a lesser disbursement (as the result of a change
in state aid formula) given the option /authority to raise a
one percent (1 %) sales tax.
DATED this 6th day of December, 1982.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 6, 1982, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of December, 1982.
City Clerk