Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-01-15_COUNCIL MEETING(/?C,/ Cli AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 15, 1979 ROLLCALL MINUTES of January 8, 1979, approved as submitted or.corrected by motion of , seconded by RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION.- Mrs. Lois Coon I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presenta- tion by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Flood Plain - Permits, Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decisions and Plan Amendments require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Appeals from Board of Appeals and Adjustments Decision 1. John J. Velie - 10 foot front yard setback variance. 25 foot rear yard setback variance, 3,147 square foot lot area variance - 4300- 4302 Valley View Road (Continue to 2/5/79) 2. Superamerica - Driveway setback from street right -of -way - Lot 2, Block 1, Enroth's First Addition (5205 Vernon Ave.) (Continued from 12/4/78) 3. KMSP -TV - 100-foot antenna height variance - 6975 York Ave. S. 4. United Properties /Twin City Federal - Sign variance - 3400 W. 66th St. (Continue to 2/26/79). II. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS III. AWARD OF BIDS AND QUOTES Tabulations and Recommendations by City Manager. Action of Council by Motion. A. Radios - City Trucks B. Replacement Pump - Tracy Lift Station C. Cars and Trucks D. Purchase of Storm Windows IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Committee Meeting Minutes - January 9, 1979 B. St refront -Yo th Action C. Bo�ard'a d Commission Appointments D. Year V - Housing Assistance Plan - Community Block Grant Procedure E. Modification - Board of Appeals and Adjustments F. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council G. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items V. RI'`+ A. Designation of Director and Alternate Director - Suburban Rate Authority B. Health Services Grant Agreement VI. FINANCE A. Motion of seconded by , for payment of the following claims as poi- Pro -List: General Fund, $46,881.94; Park Fund, $5,006.70;�Edina Art Center, $469.94; Swimming•Pool, $95.98; Colf Course, $770.66; R,--creation Center, $10,382.83; oun Range, $12.00; Water Works, $5,963.58; Sewer Rental, $112,452.85; Liquor Fund, $98,568.33; Total, $2809604.81 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Kenneth E. Rosland SUBJECT- STOREFRONT/ YOUTH ACTION DATE: January :1:2, 1979 As mentioned at the last meeting, Youth Action asked that they be .placed on the agenda to request funding above the level granted by the City- Council for 1979. This memo is written to update the status of Youth Action. Following the,,.Council's budget action, the Mayor sent a letter on Youth Action to Richfield, Bloomington and Eden Prairie. Bloomington and Richfield each provided the requested amounts. To date Eden Prairie has decided that after reviewing their total human services, -- - - - funding of Youth Action.was not at this time appropriate, since they provide at least a portion of these types of services through their Public Safety Department. In response to Eden Prairie's no funding position at present, Youth Action no longer provides any service in Eden Prairie. They. do, however, counsel some Eden Prairie residents on a referral basis at the Richfield and Edina locations. This is continued by Youth Action since some of their monies come from Hennepin County Court Services and the State Drug Rehabilitation Program, to 'provide selected services to the entire South Hennepin area. Steve - Lepinski will be present at:the meeting to discuss their request and.services in yreater depth. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council From: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Subject: Vehicle Bids Date: January 15, 1979 Attached are bids and recommendations for purchase of the following items: 1 Dump Truck Q� 1 1/2 Ton Pickup 2 3/4 Ton Vans Also bid were compact sedans on which I recommend Council reject the bids and rebid those vehicles. I would also recommend holding the bids on the police sedans until the meeting on the 5th. KR:md �W NJML6 1 33� 387 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: January 12, 1979 Material Description (General Specifications): 1 Dump Truck with box Quotations /Bids: Company 1. G.M.C. Truck Center 2. Boyer Ford Truck 3. International Harvestor . 4. Superior Ford Department Recommendation: Boyer Ford Truck Amount of Quote or Bid $17,332.46 (* Does not meet engine specifications & fuel tank requirement) $17,919.18 $18,091.55 . $18,949.00 $17,919.18 G Public Works SignatuyV Department IV Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is P�g is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase. N. Dalen, Finance Director City MMa �er's Endorsement: I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kennet i Rosl and. City Mana(ior _ REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City.Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: January 12, 1979 Material Description (General Specifications): 2 Ton Pickup ` Quotations /Bids: Co- mpany 1. Midway Ford 2. Superior Ford Amount of Quote or Bid $5397.00 $5418.00 3, Boyer Ford Trucks $5.499.22 ' 4. Malkerson $5510.07 5.. G:M.C. Truck.Center $5561.82 (Does not provide V -8) Department Recommendation Midway Ford $5397.00 Public Works Signatu 14U Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase. J N. Dalen, Finance Director C.'tyllanager's Endorsement: I. concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: firs, ., ril1 0 1 ,..•1 r. 4 ., r�•, ..,.. ,. . TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: REQUEST FOP, PURCHASE. Mayor and City Council Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF11,000 January 12, 1979 Material Description (General Specifications): 1979 3/4 Ton Vans (2) .(A) One Cargo Van (B) One Van with windows all around Quotations /Bids: I3 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Boyer Ford Trucks V (A) 6025.88 (B) 6661.60 2. Superior Ford (A) 6220:74 (B) 6742.74 3, Midway Ford (A) 6627.00' (B) 7177.00 Department Recommendation: Boyer Ford Trucks (A) 6025.88' (B) 6661.60 Public Works Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: .The recommended bid is is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase. NT : Dalen, Finance Director J City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Ki•►inr�th Rn�l _Inrl_ c;tV r.1,i11.)0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT:, REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: January 15, 1979 Material Description (General Specifications): 5 Police Sedans Quotations /Bids: Co- mpany Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Superior Ford. a� _$6,243.00 ea. x 5 = $31,215.00 2, Win Stephans Buick $6,530.00.ea. x 5 = $32,651.10 3., Malkerson $6,677..44 ea. x 5 = $33,387.20 PA „Y l Department Recommendation: Recommend award of bid to Malkerson Motors as only bidder meeting specifications. Ford fails to meet specs on carburetor, leg roor!m,axle ratio,tires and rims. �ck fars <�i axle ratio, and tir,�s //� Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is � is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase. 7 N. Dalen, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement:. 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager IW LOCATION MAP T A z is 17 ill 8 17 to 15 17 14 11 1 19 6 60 12 J3 20 15 f GO i0o t6 io) 87 -4 Od > 5: 6. Id 07 db r 10 4t4 variance SUPERAMERICA REQUEST NUMBER: . B-78-50 LOCATION: 5205 Vernon Avenue REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback 17 10 14 < 12 m 13 u4n,) vill9ge Planning department village of edina Ta�� vill9ge Planning department village of edina EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT September 21, 1978 B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 2, Block 1, Enroth's First Addition. REFER TO: attached site plan and petition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback variance. Superamerica is proposing to remove their single pump island and replace it with two rows of pump islands with a canopy above. The sidewalk in front of the building will be reduced in size, and the small landscaped area adjacent to the service road will be eliminated to accommodate this change. The Edina zoning ordinance requires a five foot landscaped area between all commercial drive aisles and a street right -of -way line. Superamerica is requesting a variance to allow the curb and asphalt to cover all of the setback area in front of the pump islands. The proponents have indicated they need the variance to allow adequate maneuvering space in the drive aisle. Recommendation: The subject property is a non - conforming site that the staff would recommend be upgraded, not reduced in conformity. The area is characterized by minimal boulevards and minimal landscaping. The proposed variance will reduce the possibility of any meaningful landscaping being installed in front of the station. The forward -most pump island maintains a fifteen foot setback which will allow a ten foot wide drive aisle with the required five foot setback. This is the same drive aisle width as provided for the riddle drive aisles. The staff does not feel the variances are necessary or desirable in this instance. Denial of the variances is recommc-nded for the following reasons: 1. Any hardship involved in the request is self- imposed. 2. The circumstances on the property are such that conformance to the ordinance is easily possible. 3. The lack of adequate landscaping in this area of the proposed variance will be detrimental to the public welfare. HS: j t 9 -14 -78 Minutes of the September 21, 1978 Board of Appeals Meeting Page 8 Mr. Posingies added the roof would also be redone so that the addition would look identical to the existing structure, but if the request was not granted it would look like a tacked on structure because the backside of the house would be jogged in a foot. Mr. Fred Hauser moved approval of the variance based upon the plans and specifications submitted with the condition that the exterior materials of the addition match the existing structure. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion of approval carried. B -78 -49 Quinten A. Collins. 3941 and 3943 West 49th Street. Lot 3, Allata's First Addition. REQUEST: 4558 square foot lot area variance 6.79 percent lot coverage variance (710 square feet) 5 foot side yard variance 33 foot rear yard variance 1 garage stall variance Mr. Sand explained to the Board that the subject property, zoned R -2, was bordered by two adjacent R -2 dwellings to the east, an R -1 Single Family property to the west, a commercial parking lot to the south, and R -1 Single Family dwellings to the north. He continued Mr. Collins was proposing to remove the detach ' garage and construct an addition containing an enlarged bedroom and bath y, family room, and three car garage. Mr. Sand stated the non - conforming lot was less than the 15,000 square feet required resulting in a 4,558 square foot lot area var- iance. The staff felt the plan could be workable in other circumstances; however, because of the length of the addition and the intensified use of the site, staff could not recommend approval of the request. Mr. Quinten Collins stated the only hardship was with his garage and long narrow driveway. Mr. Runyan's reaction was that a long wall would be built losing the sense of back yard. Mr. Richards said he felt it was an overutilization of the site. Mr. Collins discussed an alternative plan. Chairman Richards asked if he could work with the staff and return with revised plans in one month. Mr. Collins agreed. Mr. Fred Hauser moved the request be continued for one month. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the matter was continued as moved. B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 2, Block 11 Enroth's First Addition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback variance Mr. Sand told the Board the subject property bordered on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue, and the Superamerica site development was somewhat non - conforming. sland with )lae He explained the proponents were requesting to rS} ctlainedgthatutheiproponents ft and ex rows of pump islands with overhead canopy. Mr. p Minutes of the September 21, 1978 Board of Appeals Meeting Page 9 a fifteen foot wide drive aisle was necessary for the pumps. adjacent to the. Vernon Avenue frontage road. The proposed configuration would reduce the drive aisle set- back to zero. The zoning ordinance requires a five foot setback; therefore, a five foot variance was required. Mr. Sand noted that the middle drive aisles were proposed to be ten feet each, and if the subject drive aisle was built at the same ten foot width no variance would be required. He added that the staff would like to see the property upgraded and improved with landscaping rather than reduced because the boulevard and landscaping was minimal in this area. He did not feel the variances were necessary or desirable, and recommended denial for the reasons stated in the Staff Report. Mr. John Hogenson of 5904 Code Avenue, engineering manager of Superamerica, addressed the Board regarding the problem of traffic backup into the street which he felt would be alleviated by their proposal increasing the fueling points from four to eight. The proposed larger drive aisle would allow vehicles that were serviced to exit around vehicles waiting to be serviced, Mr. Hogenson noted. He also added they would upgrade the landscaping. Mr. Fred Watson, manager of Mr. Steak adjacent to Superamerica, stated he felt there was too much blacktop and concrete there already, and more green *area was needed. Mr. Runyan asked what the average width of a car would be. Mr. Hogenson replied a full sized car averaged 612 feet, and a small car about 5' 10 ". Mr. Runyan said he saw no compelling reason why the City should waive its setback requirement. Mr. Fred Hauser moved the variance be denied for the reasons stated by Staff and because it did not comply with the code requirements. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion to deny the variance request carried: B -78 -51 Ronald A. Brambilla. 6000 Olinger Boulevard. Lot 8, Block 3, Scenic View Second Addition. REQUEST: 14 foot side street setback variance Mr. Sand told the Board the subject property was a corner lot with frontages on Olinger Boulevard and Sun Road. He indicated the dwelling was required to maintain a 35 foot setback from Sun Road because the adjacent lot faces Sun Road; the subject dwelling presently maintains a 31 foot setback. Mr. Sand stated the proponents were requesting to add a third garage stall which reduces the setback to 21 feet; therefore, a 14 foot side street setback variance was required. The staff felt the addition would be logical on an interior lot. However, the property is a highly visible corner lot that forms an entrance to the neighborhood; therefore, the staff felt that the addition would noticeably encroach on the setback and thus reduce the spaciousness in the neighborhood. The staff recommended denial of the variance for the reasons stated in the staff report. Mr. Sand noted that a neighbor across Sun Road had voiced an objection to the variance prior to the meeting. ,. Mr. Ron Brambilla, the proponent, presented polaroid pictures of his 1 home to more clearly illustrate the neighborhood. He indicated they have recently met . qk LOCATION - MAP 7A 17 6 ? 2Q 16 i 5 P', 7., 7 4; P 17 8 Is 19 10 1 _V- 1- ------ 17 t8 II 14 m 17 12 13 10 15 18 ; !1--- 18 41- 14 li . t I I . . -jo 11' J. 95 19 lia 13 12 ILI (-3— zo 15 t I -ST •40 7 40 114V 1 60 ice MW (6 zo) 0 io) 4 School dFo4 rl 288W i 12 < 47 C" co Ml 5 5 > a- i�j as '7 20 CC LIL variance SUPERAMERICA REQUEST NUMBER: B-78-50 LOCATION: 5205 Vernon Avenue REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback village Planning degmirtment village of edin MFM EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT September 21, 1978 B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 2, Block 1, Enroth's First Addition. REFER TO: attached site plan and petition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback variance. Superamerica is proposing to remove their single pump island and replace it with two rows of pump islands with a canopy above. The sidewalk in front of the building will be reduced in size, and the small landscaped area adjacent to the service road will be eliminated to accommodate this change. The Edina zoning ordinance requires a five foot landscaped area between all commercial drive aisles and a street right -of -way line. Superamerica is requesting a variance to allow the curb and asphalt to cover all of the setback area in front of the pump islands. The proponents have indicated they need the variance to allow adequate maneuvering space in the drive aisle. Recommendation: The subject property is a non - conforming site that the staff would recommend be upgraded, not reduced in conformity. The area is characterized by minimal boulevards and minimal landscaping. The proposed variance will reduce the possibility of any meaningful landscaping being installed in front of the station. The forward -most pump island maintains a fifteen foot setback which will allow a ten foot wide drive aisle with the required five foot setback. This is the same drive aisle width as provided for the middle drive aisles. The staff does not feel the variances are necessary or desirable in this instance. Denial of the variances is recommended for the following reasons: 1. Any hardship involved in the request is self- imposed. 2. The circumstances on the property are such that conformance to the ordinance is easily possible. 3. The lack of adequate landscaping in this area of the proposed variance will be detrimental to the public welfare. HS: j t 9 -14 -78 Minutes of the September 21, 1978 Board of Appeals Meeting Page 8 Mr. Posingies added the roof would also be redone so that the addition would look identical to the existing structure, but if the request was not granted it would look like a tacked on structure because the backside of the house would be jogged in a foot. Mr. Fred Hauser moved approval of the variance based upon the plans and specifications submitted with the condition that the exterior materials of the addition match the.existing structure. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion of approval carried. B -78 -49 Quinten A. Collins. 3941 and 3943 West 49th Street. Lot 3, Allata's First Addition. REQUESTc 4558 square foot lot area variance 6.79 percent lot coverage variance (710 square feet) 5 foot side yard variance 33 foot rear yard variance 1 garage stall variance Mr. Sand explained to the Board that the subject property, zoned R -2, was bordered by two adjacent R -2 dwellings to the east, an R -1 Single Family property to the west, a commercial parking lot to the south, and R -1 Single Family dwellings to the north. He continued Mr. Collins was proposing to remove the detach garage and construct an addition containing an enlarged bedroom and bath y, family room, and three car garage. Mr. Sand stated the non - conforming lot was less than the 15,000 square feet required resulting in a 4,558 square foot lot area var- iance. The staff felt the plan could be workable in other circumstances; however, because of the length of the addition and the intensified use of the site, staff could not recommend approval of the request. Mr. Quinten Collins stated the only hardship was with his garage and long narrow driveway. Mr. Runyan's reaction was that a long wall would be built losing the sense of back yard. Mr. Richards said he felt it was an overutilization of the site. Mr. Collins discussed an alternative plan. Chairman Richards asked if he could work with the staff and return with revised plans in one month. Mr. Collins agreed. Mr. Fred Hauser moved the request be continued for one month. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the matter was continued as moved. B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 2, Block 1, Enroth's First Addition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback variance Mr. Sand told the Board the subject property bordered on Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue, and the Superamerica site development was somewhat non - conforming. with lae He explained the proponents were requesting to rSandc extlainedgttiatutheiproponents ft rows of pump islands with overhead canopy. Mr. p W'�M Minutes of the September 21, 1978 Board of Appeals.Meeting Page 9 a fifteen foot wide drive aisle was necessary for the pumps. adjacent to the Vernon . Avenue frontage road. The proposed configuration would reduce the drive aisle set - back to zero. The zoning ordinance requires a five foot setback; therefore, a five foot variance was required. Mr. Sand noted,. that the middle drive aisles were proposed . to be,ten.feet each, and if the subject drive aisle was built at the same ten foot width no variance would be required. He added that the staff would like to see the property upgraded and improved with landscaping rather than reduced because the boulevard and landscaping was minimal in this area. He did not feel the variances were necessary or desirable, and recommended denial for the reasons stated in the Staff Report. Mr. John Hogenson of 5904 Code Avenue, engineering manager of Superamerica, addressed the Board regarding the problem of traffic backup into the street which he felt would be alleviated by their proposal increasing the fueling points from four to eight. The proposed larger drive aisle would allow vehicles that were serviced to exit around vehicles - waiting to be serviced, Mr..liogenson noted. He also added they would upgrade the landscaping. Mr. Fred Watson, manager. of Mr. Steak adjacent to Superamerica, stated he felt there was too much blacktop and concrete there already, and more green •area was needed. Mr. Runyan asked what the.average width of.a car would be. Mr. �._ Hogenson replied a full sized car averaged 62 feet, and a small car about.5' 10 ". Mr. Runyan said he saw no compelling reason why the City should waive its setback requirement. Mr. Fred Hauser - moved the variance be denied for the reasons stated by Staff and because it did not comply with the code requirements. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion to deny the variance request carried. B -78 -51 Ronald A. Brambilla. .6000 Olinger-Boulevard. Lot 8, Block 3, Scenic View Second Addition. REQUEST: 14 foot side street setback variance Mr. Sand told.the Board the subject property was a corner lot. with frontages on Olinger Boulevard and Sun Road. He indicated the dwelling was required to maintain a 35 foot setback from Sun Road because the adjacent. lot faces Sun Road; the subject dwelling presently maintains a.31 foot setback. Mr. Sand stated the proponents were requesting to :add a third garage stall which reduces the setback to 21 feet; therefore, a 14 foot side street setback variance was required. The staff felt the addition would be logical on an interior lot. However, the property is a highly visible corner lot that forms an entrance to the neighborhood; therefore, the staff felt that the addition would noticeably encroach on the setback and thus reduce the spaciousness in the neighborhood. The staff recommended denial of the variance for the reasons stated in the staff report. Mr. Sand noted that a neighbor across Sun Road had voiced an objection to the variance prior to the meeting. Mr. Ron Brambilla, the proponent, presented polaroid pictures of his home to more clearly illustrate the neighborhood. He indicated they have recently met .4 '"Oh LOCATION MAP 17 1 16 8 17 8 �_1• 16 �- 10 19 16 ri�•f2 _ ;?J-5.4 - 9 16 9 - - --�- - a 17 to 11 - D 14 to is 10 :� - - - - - -- 18 I7 12 Crl 13 !2' _ 11'3odS _14?_ { II Y bo - -- -- 19 Is j 13 12 12 a 13 0' t° 12 0 • -- - -- -— — - CQ 25 %n 0 20 c c 13 �E 14 v 1 Z4 Ll a ,aa too i ;3 86 o y I . r tbzo) 3 2 C�O i0� T s, - School n�0-0 __' ear w o• iTi w - yy , � .; b, o i d �^ 6 m C i I I. 4o, p "' da lb t variance SUPERAMERICA REQUEST NUMBER: B -78 -50 LOCATION: 5205 Vernon Avenue REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback village alannina department village of edina EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT September 21, 1978 B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 2, Block 1, Enroth's First Addition. REFER TO: attached site plan and petition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway setback variance. Superamerica is proposing to remove their single pump island and replace it with two rows of pump islands with a canopy above. The sidewalk in front of the building will be reduced in size, and the small landscaped area adjacent to the service road will be eliminated to accommodate this change. The Edina zoning ordinance requires a five foot landscaped area between all commercial drive aisles and a street right -of -way line. Superamerica is requesting a variance to allow the curb and asphalt to cover all of the setback area in front of the pump islands. The proponents have indicated they need the variance to allow adequate.maneuvering space in the drive aisle. Recommendation: The subject property is a non - conforming site that the staff would recommend be upgraded, not reduced in conformity. The area is characterized by minimal boulevards and minimal landscaping. The proposed variance will reduce the possibility of any meaningful landscaping being installed in front of the station. The forward -most pump island maintains a fifteen foot setback which will allow a ten foot wide drive aisle with the required five foot setback. This is the same drive aisle width as provided for the middle drive aisles. The staff does not feel the variances are necessary or desirable in this instance. Denial of the variances is recommended for the following reasons: 1. Any hardship involved in the request is self- imposed. 2-. The circumstances on the property are such that conformance to the ordinance is easily possible. 3. The lack of adequate landscaping in this area of the proposed variance will be detrimental to the public welfare. HS: j t 9 -14 -78 Mr. Posingies added the roof would also be.redone so that the. addition would look identical to the' existing structure, but _ if -the request was not granted it would look like a tacked on structure because the backside of:the house would be jogged in a foot. Mr. Fred Hauser moved approval of the variance based upon the plans and specifications submitted with the condition that the exterior materials of the addition match the existing structure. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion of approval carried. B -78 -49 Quinten A. Collins. 3941 and 3943 West 49th Street. Lot 3, Allata's First Addition. REQUEST: 4558 square foot lot area variance 6.79 percent lot coverage variance (710 square feet) 5 foot side yard variance 33 foot rear yard variance 1 garage stall variance Mr. Sand explained to the Board that the subject property, zoned R -2, was bordered by two adjacent R -2 dwellings to the east, an R -1 Single Family AN property to the west, a commercial parking lot to the south, and R -1 Single Family dwellings to the north. He continued Mr. Collins was proposing to remove-the detach garage and construct an addition containing an enlarged bedroom and bath facility, family room, and three car garage. Mr. Sand stated the non - conforming lot was less than. the 15,000 square feet required resulting in a 4,558 square foot lot area var- iance. The staff felt the plan .could be workable in other circumstances; however, because of the length -of the addition and. the intensified :. use, of the site, staff. could not recommend approval of the request. Mr. Quinten Collins stated the only hardship was with his garage and long narrow driveway. Mr. Runyan's reaction was that a long wall would be built .losing the sense of back yard. Mr. Richards said he felt it was an overutilization of the site.. Mr. Collins discussed an alternative plan. Chairman Richards asked if he could work with the staff and return with revised plans in one month. Mr. Collins. agreed. Mr. Fred Hauser moved the request be continued for one month. Mr. David Runyan seconded-the motion. All voted aye; the matter was continued as moved. B -78 -50 Superamerica. 5205 Vernon Avenue. Lot 21 Block 1," Enroth's First Addition. REQUEST: 5 foot driveway...setback variance Mr. Sand told the Board the subject property bordered on Eden Avenue' and Vernon Avenue, and the Superamerica site development was somewhat non - conforming. 'He explained the proponents were requesting to replace the.-single-pump pump - island with rows of pump islands with overhead canopy. Mr. Sand explained that the proponents fe t Minutes of the September 21, 1978 Board of Appeals Meeting Page 9 a fifteen foot wide drive.aisle was necessary for the pumps adjacent to the Vernon Avenue' - ,frontage road. The proposed configuration; :,would reduce. the. drive aisle '%set back to zero. The zoning ordinance requires a five foot setback; therefore, a five .foot variance was required. Mr. Sand noted that the middle drive aisles were proposed to be ten feet each, and if the subject drive aisle was built at the same ten foot width no variance.would be required. He added that the staff would like.to.see the property upgraded and improved with landscaping rather than.reduced because the boulevard and landscaping was minimal in this area. He did not feel the variances were necessary or desirable, and recommended denial for the, reasons stated in the Staff Report. Mr. John Hogenson of 5904 Code Avenue, engineering manager of Superamerica, addressed the Board regarding the problem of traffic backup into the street which he felt would be alleviated by their proposal increasing the fueling points from four to eight. The proposed larger drive aisle would allow vehicles that were serviced to exit around vehicles waiting to be serviced, Mr. Hogenson noted. He also added they would upgrade the landscaping. Mr. Fred Watson, manager of Mr. Steak adjacent to Superamerica, stated he felt there was too much blacktop and concrete there already, and more green -area was needed. f Mr. Runyan asked what the average width.of a car would,be...Mr. Hogenson replied a full-sized car averaged 6z feet, and a"small car- about,5' 10. Mr. Runyan said he saw no compelling reason why the City should waive. its setback requirement. Mr. Fred Hauser moved the variance be denied for the reasons stated by Staff and because it did not comply with the code requirements. Mr. David Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion to deny the variance request carried. B -78 -51 Ronald A. Brambilla. 6000 Olinger Boulevard. Lot 8`.Block 3, Scenic View Second Addition. REQUEST: 14 foot side street setback variance Mr. Sand told the Board the subject property was a,corner.lot with frontages on Olinger Boulevard and Sun Road. He indicated the.dwelling was required to maintain a 35 foot setback from Sun Road 'becaus.e..the'adjacent 'lot ' faces. Sun :Road; the subject dwelling presently maintains a.31 foot setback. Mr. Sand stated the proponents were requesting to add a third garage stall which reduces the setback to 21 feet; therefore, a 14 foot side street setback variance was required. The staff felt the addition would be logical on an interior lot. However, the property is a highly visible corner lot that forms an entrance to the neighborhood; therefore, the staff felt that the addition would noticeably encroach on the setback and thus reduce the spaciousness in the neighborhood. The staff recommended denial .of the variance for the reasons.stated in the staff report. Mr. Sand 'noted that a .. neighbor across .Sun Road had voiced an objection to the variance_prior.,to the . meeting. Mr. Ron Brambilla, the proponent, presented polaroid pictures of his 'home "to more 'clearly illustrate the neighborhood. He indi=cated they have recently met i -- f � ,ran-anw naw ..•arav � '\ 1`V V 7 3 L 1 S` 1 �� d` a :>;9, I \.. _.•a_.,,..). �e zg I�`— :�x - -oP�I ;; ;� � .a....�,. Ins. -.��'� o h ar \ \ . 111 ` 1, ' e! \ bi °'•I, .� � � a visa 9�•T (F Na..a � ¢ �j� of � e I I 1! - p' �� MlAJ 9N fla.M 464. - .4 w I,•�. I wea,�� � _ —_ ` ( —_ _ ` ' ( . �• � ��y�ra -. �s..y'in9 4f'a0avaw.+aK1 �1 SY.Fw. ! 9aw \ 4] MA It th ir 1 P39rawl N r-,F= •�i i V Qa 1 , '..9 i� I '�. �} � .- .,...,., .,.,� .,,,, � II o J � v � o :�' :ono i ' I �. / •.r, . i ! .._. _.. I (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS will meet at the Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street, on Thursday, November 16, 1978, at 5:30 p.m and will at said time and place - consider the following: 1. K1SP_TV 6975 York Avenue South. Registered Land Survey No. 629. REQUEST: 99 foot antenna height variance to permit a 149 foot antenna 2. John J. Velie 4.300 -02 Valley View Road. All that part of the northwest quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 28, Range 24, lying south of West 62nd Street, west of Brookview Avenue and northeasterly of Valley View Road. REQUEST: setback variances 3. Rauenhorst Corporation 7700 France Avenue South. Parts of tracts N, 0, P, and Q of Registered Land Survey No. 1129. REQUEST: 1 story building height variance -to permit a 4 story building 5 foot side yard variance. 4. William & Bernice Jackson 5660 Woodcrest Drive. Lot 16, Block 3, Colonial Grove 6th Addition. REQUEST: 5.6 percent lot coverage variance . (270 square ,foot additior) All recommendations and objections will be heard at said meeting. . BY ORDER OF THE EDINA BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTMENTS. FLORENCE. B. HALLBERG City Clerk Please -publish in the Edina Sun on Wednesday, November 1, 1978. Please send 4 Affidavits of Publication. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council 1*13 VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: January 12, 1979 Material Description (General Specifications): Storm windows for west side of building - set inside existing curtain wall Quotations /Bids: Company 2. c.A4-1,tA Department Recommendation: Amount of Quote or Bid $ 1;777.40. 1-1 tlllti Signature Departure Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is 5Tis not 0 within the amount b geted for the purchase. N-2z&L J. N. Dalen Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: I/ 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: 43zKennet Rosland City Manager M r � 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -6861 VAQl1T TTTTnM V6� WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement of Valley View Road from St. Johns Ave. to Oaklawn Ave; and / WHEREAS, the improvement does not conform to the approved minimum stand- ards as previously adopted for such Municipal State Aid Street and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal.State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; and WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions would be a necessary prerequisite to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City has been determined. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that parking on the above mentioned street be restricted so that no parking is permitted on the North side of Valley View Road from St. Johns Ave. to Oaklawn Ave. ADOPTED this 15th day of January, 1979. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,.do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Mee.ting:of January 15, 1979, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 25th day of February, 1979. City Clerk 1 1 A. I RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DIRECTOR AND ALTERNATE DIRECTOR TO SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of �� Minnesota, as follows: A.. is hereby designated as a director of the Suburb Rate Authority, and �� c�..� --0��9 is hereby desig- nated to serve as alternate director of the Suburban Rate Authority for the year 1979 and until their successors are appointed. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS. CITY OF ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Clerk of the City of hereby certify that the attached and foregoing is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the City Council of on at its meeting 197, as the same is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of such council for said date, on file and of record in my office. Dated this day of , 1979. City Clerk (SEAL) City of To: Mayor Van Valkenburg From: Florence Hallberg Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Appointment Date: January 12, 1979 With the resignation of Lois Coon from the Traffic Safety Committee, a new member should be'appointed. You should be aware that Lois served in her capacity as Chairman of the Citizens Safety Committee and that the new Chairman is Alison Fuhr. cc,: Kenneth E. Rosland MEMORANDUM To: Mayor and Council From: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Subject: New Board of Appeals Proposal Date: January 12, 1979 After thought and discussion by myself and the City staff, we would like to recommend the following organization for the Board of Appeals: 1) Five person Board. 2) Three people comprise a quorum. 3) No Council representative on the Board. 4) Meet two times a month. 5) Notification only, no publication. 6) Set meeting dates to expedite reaching the Council in the shortest possible time when any appeal is made. Mr. Erickson has reviewed this proposal and feels comfortable with it and it does meet State Statute requirements. However, it would require a change in our ordinance. This proposal is being made to expedite variance requests whenever possible and also to give additional judgement to proposed variances. f 0 KR:md 6th Annual PEOPLEMALMG WORKSHOP presented by The Edina Human Relations Commission and Project CHarlie SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 18,1978 Edina West Upper Division (Enter Door 5) Coffee /Registration .......................... 9:00 -9:30 A.M. Keynote Address ............................ 9:30 -10:30 A.M. Workshops ............................ 10:45 A.M. 42:15 P.M. Repeat of Morning Workshops ............. 1:15 -2:45 P.M. TICKETS AVAILABLE AT DOOR $1.00 BOX LUNCHES available @$2.25 each To reserve lunch call before noon November 17 926 -4430 or 929 -5342 or 933 -8430 For more information call 926 -3000 I1. I7S KEYNOTE ADDRESS Auditorium Family Connections: Binding res or Double Binds? A look at a model for healthy family relationships. Defining healthy and problematic families, and extremes in families that cause problems. Dr. Marian D. Hall Director of Psychology, Children's Health Center, Minneapolis PhD. Child Psychology, University of Minnesota Post doctoral study at Hampstead Clinic and Tavistock Center, London Publications include. Adolescent Behaviors in School Marriage and the Family in the Modern World School Psychology in Minnesota WORKSHOPS Repeated at aftemoon session Room 240 "I Know You Thought You Heard What I Said, But ... " Ellie Killorin, Family Therapist, Fairview- Southdale Family Renewal Center Exploring the patterns of communication in families that prevent us from hearing each other. A chance to look at what happens in your family to block effective communication. Bring a family member! Room 239 Interaction Between Home and Office: An Exploration Ed Chmielewski, Employee Counselor Medtronic, Inc. and his wife, Judy, Employee Counselor, Litton Microwave What positive steps can be taken by families and corporations to keep home and office supportive of one another. How to assess family gains and losses on the ladder to success. Room 238 How To Cope With Conflicting Values in the Family Bob Subby, Director of Treatment Services, First Step, Minneapolis Discussion of family structure and rules within a family system. The effect of rules, roles and goals on the growth of family members. Room 237 It's Okay To Be Old Patsy Costello, Director of Education, Ebenezer Society, Minneapolis Exploding commonly held myths and stereotypes about older people. Building positive relationships between generations. �Alg2'i"te[Mvivre, Room 23 6 Parents Are People, Too Ray Nordine, Executive Director, Family Plus, Minneapolis How to stop being manipulated by your kids. Reclaim your house. Take charge of your life. Parents and kids both have rights. :..,. _ I Closing Out A Relationship: A Means of Learning and Growing Don Schultz, Family Consultant, Judson Family Center, Minneapolis Exploring the stages of separation in a relationship and the resulting restructuring of families. A look at positive growth situations for single per- sons. Room 234 Intimacy and Dependency Miriam Ingebritson, Aftercare Supervisor, Fairview - Southdale Family Renewal Center. Exploring how intimacy develops within the family or how to get what you want out of a relationship. Room 233 How To Build Self- Esteem in Your Child Project CHarlie, Elementary Team: Nancy Reinisch, Ted Gwinn, Judy Terrien, Wayne Krefting Your Child Is Someone Special! Simple messages and creative exercises to promote this feeling in the family at home. Room 231 Raising Mothers and Daughters Jean Clarke, Director, Mothers, Fathers and Others Who Care About Children, and her daughter J.J. As daughters go through various stages of growth, mothers can do some special growing of their own. Leam some ways mothers and daughters can help each other grow, mature, separate, and come back together as friends. :.•u Nurturing Fathers Dr. Michael Obsatz, Associate Professor of Education and Sociology at Macalester College Discussion of the joys and problems of fathers. A look at caring com- munication between fathers and their children. Problems of fathers in special situations, single non - custodial, single with custody, etc. n Sponsored By: Calvary Lutheran Church Christ Presbyterian Church Church of Our Lady of Grace Clyde Green Colonial Church of Edina Edina ABC Foundation Edina City Council Edina Community Education Edina Community Lutheran Church Edina Federated Junior Women's Club Edina Human Relations Commission Edina Jaycees Edina League of Women Voters Edina- Morningside Community Congregational Church Edina Mrs. Jaycees Edina Public Schools Edina Senior Citizens Edina Special Children's Group Fairview Southdale Auxiliary Fred Klein Friends of Edina Community Library Good Samaritan United Methodist Church Jackson Graves Lutheran Church of The Master Normandale Lutheran Church Project CHarlie PTA Council Razidlo Advertising St. Stephen's Episcopal Church Shepard of the Hills Lutheran Church Arrangements for Resource Exhibits made by — South Hennepin Human Services Council Task Force On Family Violence Storefront /Youth Action January 9;::1979 To: The Edina Human Relations Commission From: Katherine Sehlin Subject: 1978 Peoplemaking Week and Workshop Attachments: Brorphures, minutes of meetings, list of volunteers, reports of each committee, evaluation sheets and report, copies of pictures taken at workshops, copies of publicity, report of button project, building use permit, and request for funds from community education. Peoplemaking 1978 was held the week of November 13th through Saturday the 18th. It provided an opportunity for all of us who are family members to learn and grow with each other, to explore with experts and others like ourselves the endless possibilities for enriching our relationships and thus our lives. It provided a week of programs and activities for Edina citizens of 'all ages, culminating in a day of workshops.designed to stimulate posit ve.thinking about ourselves and those we love; sharing, caring ,.listening, and learning were:,-major themes. The 1978 Peoplemaking got to a late start:in their planning. A steering committee composed of representatives of interested churches, organizations, and individual citizens was established and after the second meeting the following committees were established: Program - Chick Strawbridge, Chairperson Publicity - Richard Mahoney, Sue Bonoff Arrangements - Peggy Kelly, Nancy Diggs Finance - Tom Oye, Ray O'Connell, Leslie Turner Churches - Pat Llona Posters and Buttons - Judy Lieber Community Follow up - Connie Dietrick Katherine Sehlin accepted the general chairmanship in late August. Because of the wonderful group of volunteers working together the job for me was not too difficult. The mechanics of setting up this type of program may vary but I think we all can agr,ee•on the following recommendations: 1. Get started early in the year. An evaluation of past workshops and their program content should be made by an appointed steering committee. 2. A needs assessment of the community should..be -.made to establish.theme and programs, maybe such topics as transportation, health,`housing, environment, handicapped, recreation,.inflation, have a place in these workshops. i 3. Volunteers of past years should be asked to help again. 4. Regular meeting dates of civic groups should be checked for better information contact. 5. Get finance letter out early. 6. -All papers should be dated, publicity should have time, date, and place, and any other directions to help people find their way. 7. Reponsibility of each committee.should be clearly defined and responsibilities distributed so one person doesn't have too much to do. ? I'd like to take this opportunity to thank all of those who worked.on Peoplemaking 1978•. — and hope there will be many more Peoplemaking events in Edina. E. 6 Respectfully, �Cktiilau�J lSo hGn� i. Katherine Sehlin i 4 Because of the variety of programs it is difficult for me to know just how many people participated in Peoplemaking 1978• 256- registered'Saturday, November 18th not all were required to register. Evaluation Report 1978 Family Life Workshop 125 people completed evaluation questionnaires. 1) Which individual sessions did you attend? a. Keynote address? 102 people attended 20 people did not attend 3 people did not reply b. 10:45 -12:15 session? "I know you thought you heard what I said, but" 22 people attended Intimacy and Dependency .18 people attended How to Build Self- Esteem in Your Child 14 people attended How to Cope with Conflicting values in the Family 11 people attended Parents Are People, Too 10 people attended Interaction between Home and Office 8 people attended Raising Mothers and Daughters 8 people attended It's Okay to be Old 7 people attended Closing Out a Relationship 6 people attended Nurturing.Fathers 3 people attended* c. 1:15- 2:45 session? Raising Mothers and - Daughters 24-.people attended Parents Are People, Too .16 people - attended Intimacy and Dependency 15 people attended "I know you thought_ -you - heard what I said, but" - - -- -- 14 people attended How to Cope with Conflicting Values 10 people attended Closing Out a Relationship, 9 people attended How to Build Self Esteem in Your Child 6 people attended It's Okay to'be Old 4 people attended Interaction between Home and Office 3 people attended Nurturing Fathers 2 people attended 2) How.would you rate the individual sessions.you attended? a. Keynote address? Excellent (13) Very Good (26) Good (34) Fair (26) Poor (3) Comments: "I am insulted by a speaker who reads textbook material instead of speaking on his own.. Sounded like she was reading a textbook." "Very little new material ". ..,_S i.^ ';:.1 F.r�. -_. ,'�a. `,? crly ^(1 - -.. ?•. ', ;1 tf "It was not Dr. Hall's fault that she started her one hour Keynote Address at 9:45 rather than 9:30 a.m., but why did she stop at 10:15 rather than 10:30? She must have 'known that-it was .a one hour lecture .and that the small groups started at 10 :45. Seriously, I learned more about her subject from the description of what she was to talk about in the Wednesday Sun than her short talk which she read. I told my husband that he couldn't go wrong by spending time (one hour) at 2. the Keynote address. We both were very disappointed. Dr. Hall spent a good portion of her ?hour talk on touching infants, at what time they establish eye- to-eye contact, when they physically reach, sit, etc. Very little time was spent on "A look at a model for healthy family relationships"; defining healthy and problematic families, and extremes in families that cause problems -the description of her talk to the right of her picture on the workshop brochure. I was shocked and so disappointed at 10:15 when she ended her talk ---a person whose . education and experience could give so much to us. Sorry, but thanks for my 6th workshop. ",. b. 10:45 -12:15 session? "I know you thought you heard what I said, but" Excellent (12) Very Good (8) Good (2) Fair (0) Poor (0) Intimacy and Dependency Excellent (0) Very Good (7) Good (6) Fair (0) Poor (2) Comments: "Showed little promise for me after the first few minutes" "Poorly presented; weak message regarding parenting; not as advertised" "non-- authoritive" "spoke below level of intellect of group" "This became more of a communications workshop than one on intimacy" "Didn't realize it would be 100% family oriented" How to Build Self- Esteem in Your Child" Excellent (5) . Very Good (5) Good (4) Fair (0) Poor (0) .How to Cope with Conflicting Values in the Family Excellent (4) Very Good (6). Good (0) Fair (1) Poor (07 Parents Are People, Too Excellent (5) Very Good (4) Good (1). Fair (0) Poor (0) — Interaction between Home and Office - -- -- Excellent (1) Very Good (6) Good (1) Fair (0) Poor (0) Raising Mothers and Daughters Excellent (2) Very Good (4) Good (2) Fair (0) Poor (0) It's Okay to Be Old Excellent (1) Very Good (5) Good (0) Fair O Poor (0) Closing Out a Relationship Excellent (3) Very Good (2) Good (1) Fair (0) Poor (0) Nurturing Fathers Excellent (0) Very Good (2) Good (0) Fair (1) Poor (0) e.1:15- 2:45 session? Raising Mothers and Daughters Excellent (12) Very Good (6) Good (1) Fair (0) Poor (0) Comment: "Excellent because it spoke to specific.,group" Parents Are People., Too Excellent ( 5) Very Good (8) Good (1) Fair (1) Poor (0) Comment: "Fair -only a plug for his business" Intimacy and Dependency Excellent ( 7) Very Good (5) Good (2) Fair (1) Poor (0) Comment: "Didn't quite Fret to point" xc(_,Lieni; ( 5) very Goou (3) Good (1) "air (U) Poor (G) How to Cope with Conflicting Values Excellent ( 3) Very Good (1) Good .(3) Fair (0) Poor (1) Comments: "Too much theoretical discussion" "No practical application. Learned too much about his alcoholic.family and nothing else" "Had attended this,before. and.didn't realize it was''same" "I am not able to rate this session. I believe:.it..didn't deal with what .Ithought it would" Newspaper (13) Edina Sun (8). Minneapolis Star - Tribune (1) Billboards around Edina (5) Word of mouth (3) At work (3 ) Steering Committee (2) Alanon (2) From a speaker (2) Human Relations Commission (2) League of Women Voters (1) PTA (1) Edina Police Department (1) By asking (1) Flyer mailed to me (2) 4) In' general, do you think you gained something from attending? Yes (123) No (0) No Reply (2) Why or why not: "Definitely; New insights, some new ideas, new ways to look at thin? -,- "It has restored my faith that we humans have capacity for change and improvements" "Skills to build my own and family's self esteem" "Learned skills to help in everyday situations" "A day Brent thinking- and reevaluating" 'i�,cntent was t"nouF;ht provoking" "Reinforcement of thoughts'and feeling" "Good- qualified leaders" "Well organized" "Interaction between people" "I've learned new concepts" "More insight into understanding myself and my children" "Exchange.of.ideas.and problems" _ '. Closing Out 'a Relationship Excellent (2) Very Good (3) Good .(3) Fair (1)` Poor; (0) - How to Build Self - Esteem in Your Child Excellent (2) Very Good (3) ' Good (1) Fair (0)- Poor (0) It's Okay to be Old Excellent (1) Very Good (2) Good (0) Fair (0) Poor (0) Interaction between Home and Office Excellent (1) Very Good (2) Good (0) Fair (0) Poor (0) Nurturing Fathers . Excellent (0) Very Good (0) Good (0) Fair (1) Poor (0) Comment: "Too little presented-mostly discussion that tended to be redundant" 3) How did you find out about this workshop? Printed material (10) Brochure brought home from school (27) Church (17) Pastor Colony Library (3) School (1) Friends .(19) Attended before (11) Newspaper (13) Edina Sun (8). Minneapolis Star - Tribune (1) Billboards around Edina (5) Word of mouth (3) At work (3 ) Steering Committee (2) Alanon (2) From a speaker (2) Human Relations Commission (2) League of Women Voters (1) PTA (1) Edina Police Department (1) By asking (1) Flyer mailed to me (2) 4) In' general, do you think you gained something from attending? Yes (123) No (0) No Reply (2) Why or why not: "Definitely; New insights, some new ideas, new ways to look at thin? -,- "It has restored my faith that we humans have capacity for change and improvements" "Skills to build my own and family's self esteem" "Learned skills to help in everyday situations" "A day Brent thinking- and reevaluating" 'i�,cntent was t"nouF;ht provoking" "Reinforcement of thoughts'and feeling" "Good- qualified leaders" "Well organized" "Interaction between people" "I've learned new concepts" "More insight into understanding myself and my children" "Exchange.of.ideas.and problems" _ 4. "Awareness of values we already know but need to be reminded of" "Expanded awareness of family dynamics" "A better understanding of family relations as related to work /career" "An appreciation of how to improve my communication with my family "Communication skills needed. I'll give it a try" "Learned about resources. Heard some good speakers" "It is wonderful to see old friend's and measure growth" "Motivating force" "Puts things in right perspective" "I grew" "Received constructive thoughts and attitudes from Ray Nordine that will be helpful in our family" "Hopefully I learned a few things from Bob Subby I hope to grow with" "Keynote speaker reaffirmed my own belief in role of father from childbirth. Definitions of family bind, ties, and combinations thereof enlightening" "New concepts and ideas are beneficial in an on- growing life" "It's a sharing experience. It's always good to hear information restated" "The session topics were of pertinent concern to me" 5) Have you attended any of the previous Peoplemaking workshops? Yes (52) No (73) If YES, how many? One previous workshop (g) Two previous workshops (13) Three previous workshops (9) Four previous workshops (2) Five previous or ALL (12) 6) Do you think Peoplemaking workshops should continue on an annual basis? Yes (123) No (0) No reply (2) Comments: "Absolutely.' I love the family focus and individual growth emphasis" "Good opportunity for citizens to gain exposure to current theories and philosophies governing family, individual growth" "Very useful information presented. Excellent way of bettering ourselves on an ongoing process" "Changing trends in society -need for extended family support units and awareness training, parental education" "They're good and can help a great deal in your everyday life.' " Comment by 15 year old "I would definitely come again. Very interesting" "Excellent way to relay help to the community" "People cannot fail to benefit from them" "They are great" "Underscore my YES. This is an excellent endeavor to involve this community in concerns we all share and can grow from" "Excel.lAnt opportunity for rrovth" to -`nn in �r -3teps for proble-m Solving" "Really great. Good Price" "In general, excellent resource persons and information" "I think there is something for everyone. Very good in large community for widdening horizons and personal growth" "This is an outstanding community event" 5. 7) Were the resource exhibits helpful to you? Yes (77) No (15) Didn't take time to look at them (20) Lhy or.why not: "Didn't realize how "much information and help was actually available" "Gives you places to go for additional help" "Useful - information to have on hand for reference and referral" "I took many of the pamphlets and bought a book I have Why not wanted" . "Good to know what.other programs are available "' "Introduction to available resources since we are new to Minneapolis" "Not applicable to my needs" "Didn't feel I needed the information" "Primarily oriented toward drug /chemical,rape, child. abuse. Nothing on building adult to adul# relationships, expression, feelings" "Already familiar with" "Previous exposure through parenting courses, libraries" "Didn't have time to observe" "Brochures in a pile are not as effective as people to bounce questions off of about the material" Please answer the following questions - about "yourself: Sex Female (97) Male (24) Age Teenagers (3) in 20's- (10) in 30's (35) in 40's (44) in 50's (20) in 60's (5) I am Single (10) Married (96) *Remarried (1) Divorced (12) .*Separated (1) Widowed (1) *(not asked on questionnaire).,, My children are Under one year (2) Preschool (one to four years old (18) 5 years to 12 ears (80) Teenagers (82� 18 years to 21 years (50) 22 years and older (56) Number of children:" No children .(15). Three children (29) Four children (16) Five children ( 2) Six children ( 4) Seven children (1) - Eight children (1) 22 Suggestions for the future: I "More often would be helpful" "Hold perhaps twice a year" "Two shorter sessions —b' days" "I wanted to attend more sessions" "Should be time to take more than two lecture /seminars" "Especially liked having two sessions. I felt less frustrated.as more gained from each" "More publicity, even in the Twin City area" "I liked the big painted signs this year" "What does it cost to put it on? Is it cost effective ?" "I would like to see "advanced" courses, billed for people who have certain background information. I hear some things over and over, but I don't believe I've heard it all. I'd like to be directed to the next level. I know this sounds simplistic - -I hope my meaning is clear. Also I would like to see sessions for young people- -not babysitting, but sessions for families or older children- -they can benefit from this kind of thing, too .'" Evaluation Sheet Sixth Annual Peoplemaking Workshop - 1978 1) Which individual sessions did you attend? a. Keynote address? Yes No b. 10:45 -12:15 session? (Please name) C. 1:15 - 2:45 session? (Please name) 2) How would you rate the individual sessions you attended? (Please circle and follow the order listed in Question.l) a. Keynote address? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor b. 10:45 -12:15 session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor C. 1:15- 2:45 session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor 3) How did you find out about this workshop? 4) In general, do you think you gained something from attending ?, Yes No Why or why not? 5) Have you attended any of.the previous Peoplemaking workshops? Yes No If YES, how many? 6) Do you think Peoplemaking workshops should continue on an annual basis? Yes No Comments: 7) Were the resource exhibits helpful to you? Yes No Why or why not? Please answer the followi:;g qu >stior:'��ut oarseli': Sex Approximate age I am: Single Married Divorced My children are years-old. Thank you! Widowed r -)EDI rIA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 -,II -" January-2, 1979 Mr. Bernie Greensweig, President Storefront /Youth Action 6612 Lyndale Avenue South Richfield, MN 55423 Dear Bernie: I have asked Ken Rosland to schedule your hearing regarding our reduction of dollars for Storefront /Youth Action on Monday, January 15th. At this time I cannot say what will be on the agenda for the meeting, however, this type of request will come later on our agenda after our public hearings. One never knows how fast they will move so I would recommend you and your group by available around 7:15 p.m. Sincerely yours, James Van Valkenburg Mayor JVV:m cc: Florence Hallberg, City Clerk t 4 Z. APPLJ- a. NUMBER 3, STATE e. NUMBER FEDERAL ASSISTANCE CANTS APPUCA. non L TYPE ❑ FJIPPIILATIOH APP. b• DATE IDENTI- pR 0. DATE 19 Year °O1� day OF CATION FIER acctewse ACTION ❑ APPLMATION (Markap• ❑,NGTIFICJITI7,N OF INTENT (Opt) Leas. =oa►r" , ❑ REPORT OF FEDEM ACTION Biddle 4. LEGAL' APPU CANT/ RECIPIENT a. Apolkvd Kam City of Edina 0. Ortseltatioe Utlit • e. Stteet/P.O. ban 4801 West 50th Street d. cly .Edina coaab : Hennepin F. sots MN fl. ZIP Cade: 55424 L Contact Peron (Nam. Ken Rosland & trlepio%e No.) 927-8861 7. TITLE AND DESCRIPTION OF APPLICANTS PROJECT 8 OUG Aciprovel No. 29-RMA . Year suo-JA day 19 S. FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO. 0. I l0 PRO. e. NUM9ER GRAM: 0. TITLE ( From Fed" Catalog) II. TYPE OF APPLICANT /RECIPIENT A -S:ata H- Community Action Atrney B- In[.ntats I- Nit her Eauaboml Institution C- Sutxur J -Inaun Tribe District V.-Other (Speaifv): D -Couaq E -City F -Sehod Olstdet G-S 11hri Purpose Oistnef Suter appropriate letter 9. TYPE OF ASSISTANCE' A."L;.Grant D- Insurance H..Supplemostal Grant E -Other Eater appro. C.-wit priate dtter(e) 10. AREA OF PROJECT IMPACT (Nomu of citt". eaantiaa. 1L ESTIMATED NUM • HER OF PERSONS TYPE OF APPU[.AUVn A-Nen C- RMcion E- Au ;mantatien BtaiM.) BENEFITING 112. 1)- Renseel D- Coatiauatioa Eater appropriate kttar ❑ • 13. PROPOSED FUNDING 14. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF: 1S. TYPE OF CHANGE (For eta or 196) - I F -DUser (SpecVv) t s. FTDELAL I S •00 a. APPLICAXT 0. P=ECT Inemse Dollars B -Decrease Dollar Crthemse Durtion ►. A °� .O0 D--0eueass,,Durttion- E -06callsuaa t STATE •00 16. PROJC T START DATE YearwtoatAday 17. PROJECT DURATION Eateraypro- FT7 pride Jrttarlel [. LOLL 00 19 Months 18. ESTIMATED DATE TO Year soatA day 119. EXISTING FEDERAL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER s OTHER -00 BE SUBMITTED TO L �� _ AO FEDERAL AGENCY ► 19 20. FEDERAL AGENCY TO RECEIVE REQUEST (Noma. City. Staea. ZZJP soda) 2L REMARKS ADDED e [3 No C] Y.s 2L t. To the best of my bmiedt. and belie(. b. If - required by Dub Circular A.-95 tiuis MIKAtioo. ear tubrnitted,. purw+rtt. to. in' No re- Rerpo+s.e til"A, aaarin4ncuses and - responses Iry anacb id. ayorsas attached data in . -this Prs°pdiutiw /aDGliutlon era auvcucoo b appreptttte .all F THE true and oorrrct. the docuumt bat bnn ❑ ❑ APPLICANT duly authoriUd by Cue 11-- int.bodf of �) - - C CERTIFIES the apoliant and (ha axlicaat "ill cumWy ❑ ❑ Fal( THAT p with Na almchad amrama It the addle- 0 ❑ ❑ able is apprond. (7) 23, s TYPED NAJIE AND TITLE 1► SIGNATURE a. DATE SIGNED Year ssoaLL day CERTIFYING Kenneth E. Rosland REPRE- SENTATIVE City Manager - - - - - -. ...25: APPUCA• - -Y.or "soa4 day 24. AGENCY NAME TION RECEIVED 19 21L ORGANIZATIONAL UNIT 27. ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE 23. DENT L APPLI TION 30. FEDERAL GRANT 29. ADORE= IDENTIFICATION 3'- FUNDING Year smontA day 34. Year month -day, 3L ACTION TAKEN STARTING I Q AWAROED a. FEOER/LL t .00 31. ACTION DATE► 19 DATE 19 . - 35. CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMA• 3ti. rear mouth day 0. RFJECTLO b APPLICANT •CO . TION (Name and raueyioas aasmber) ENDING o RETURNED FOR t. SATE •DO DATE 19 AMENDMENT d. LOLL .00 37. REMARKS ADDED d. DEFERRED .. OT) ER .00 � Yes, flNo a 1t(THDRAxN I. TClAL S .00 38. a. In taut aoo.e action, ley C=,m is reanw7.frmm deerrrtr•evssa very con. is due Uuraa prmr.a.om ux' Psrt 1. UNB orcclar I�Sa, ),- FEDERAL AGE9CT A- 95,OFFICIAL IN and telapAo+.a no.) F'©ERAL AGENCY 11,10. II ■temp rss»nsul at bas blue of as am( aura. ( "5 ACTION STANDARD FORM 42a. PAGE 1 (10 -75) 424 -101 Pnvor%W by GSA. Foaerul llaaopem"c Cireslar 71-7 Form Approved OMB No. 63 -RI619 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ..City of . Edina - 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY rte, 4. LJ ORIGINAL (each yearl ❑ REVISION, DATED FROM TO 1979 1980 ❑ AMENDMENT,OATED 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Mornin side School Continued Relevance B. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Citv of Edina 927-R861 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The project is a continuation of a multi -year project initiated in Year IV of the CDBG program. It is anticipated that funding from Year V. and VI will be necessary to complete the necessary work. Cost estimates for the project are listed in the project description under Year IV. Year V funding will be used primarily to cover the cost of demolition of the school and preliminary landscaping on the site. Year VI funding will be used for final landscaping and for permanent recreational facilities. W"Check if continued on additional pagefs) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACTISUENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS Presently the facilities in Weber Park primarily serve the needs of organized sports. The addition of the school site to the park will preserve existing recreational opportunities for young children and will provide opportunities for adults, especially the elderly. The addition . to the park will achieve the goal of expanding recreational opportunities for groups presently inade- quately served. ❑ Check if continued on additions /page(s) and attach. 13. COBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in mousands of S) CDBG • i OTHER /List component activities using names of activities shown LOW /MOO OTHER I AMOUN T SOURCE in Pan A, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUD•7067.1 BENEFIT BENEFIT lal (b) Icl (d) (eJ Morningside School 5o.v I Is Is is 14. Totals 50 .0 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns band c) S50. 0 . HUD -7060 16-781 Replaces Form HUD- 7015.1. wmcn a Ob Page of pages - Morningside Neighborhood Revitalization The availability of CDBG funding has allowed the City of Edina to undertake a comprehensive nieghborhood revitalization program.in the Morn- ingside area of Edina, census tract 231. The central element of this pro - gram is loans and grants for housing rehabilitation. CDBG funds, available through the City's deferred loan program, tied to Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) low interest loans has put needed home repairs and improvements within the reach of many families and - elderly residents with low and.moderate incomes. This program has been available in -all years of the CDBG program. Since the beginning of the Block Grant program, several other projects have been initiated in support of the housing projects. Included in the sup- port projects are the replacement of public street and sidewalks, storm and sanitary sewers, and acquisition and improvements. This application would add special assessment relief to low income homeowners and development of the park- land acquired in Year IV to projects in the area. The list indicates.projects either wholly or partially funded by CDBG funds in the Morningside neighborhood: CDBG Year I - V II III II IV - V - VI V, VI Project Name Deferred Payment Loans Description Principal write -down for-home repairs and improvements. Morningside Planning -& Engineering Staff-engineering work related to public improvements. Morningside Improvements Neighborhood Park Improvements Morningside School Special Assessment Relief Resurface streets; replace sidewalks, water lines, storm And sanitary sewers. Upgrading facilities in neighborhood parks. Purchase closed school with- .:intent. of preser- ving and expanding recreational opportun -, ities in adjacent Weber Park. Provide grants for low income residents unable to pay assessments to public facilities. Morningside Neighborhood Revitalization Page 2 With the exception of special assessment relief, which is included in this application, all projects listed previously are underway at this time. Improve- ments to public facilities in the neighborhood are nearing completion. Although revitalization efforts to date have shown positive effects in the neighborhood, it is imperative that the plan for the area be completed in all areas. The major items remaining are the continuation of loans and grants for housing rehabilitation, completion of the addition to Weber Park (Morningside School), and special assessment relief for low income homeowners. The individual projects are described in the attached project descriptions. Housing Rehabilita- tion loans and grants.and Weber Park (Morningside School) are continuing projects, and special assessment relief is a.new project. The goal of the project is to restore the attractive residential environment that.once existed in the neighborhood. The continuation of CDBG assisted programs can significantly effect the realization of this goal. CL: j t 1 -11 -79 Form Approved MAD M., A1_01rIo US. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA 2. 'APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER " - PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4. ® ORIGINAL (each year/ ❑ REVISION, DATED FROM TO 1979 1980 ED AMENDMENT. DATED 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS 5. NAME OF PROJECT Special Assessment Relief Under Review 8. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Citv of Edina 997-8861 1C. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT As a part of the neighborhood revitalization plan for Morningside, public facilities including streets, sidewalks, storm sewer, sanitary sewer", and water lines were replaced in the area. The cost of the project was distributed be- tween the City, C)BG funds, and special assessments on benefiting properties. e special assessment, amounting to approximately $1,500 per lot, represents substantial burden for many neighborhood residents. The urban county will conduct a survey that identifies _the need existing in the :neighborhood. This need can be addressed in subsequent years. Although special assessment relief would be available to homeowners /occupants ity -wide, it is anticipated that it will be used primarily in the Morningside. ® Check if continued on additional pages) and attach. 11, CENSUS TRACT(S) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S)" City -wide but especially census tract 231 12." ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS The goal of the project is to prevent improvements in•the neighborhood, primary from forcing residents from their homes because of inability to pay the special assessments. ❑ Check, if continued on additional page(s) and attach. PROGRAM'YEAR FUNDS (in thousands of $1 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES OTHER (List component activities using names of activities shown CDBG . inftrtA, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUD•7067.1 LOW /MOO OTHER AMOUNT I SOURCE - BENEFIT BENEFIT (a) (b) (c) ldi lei S10.0 S S Special Assessment Relief 14. Totals I,S..10..0 Is I S 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) S 10..0 Replaces Form HUO.70151, wmcn n JSrolete Page of pages HUD -7066 (6-781 Special Assessment Relief - City of Edina 10. area. The program will be designed to pay all or part of the assessment based on family size and income. Qualifications would closely parallel those of the City's existing deferred payment loan program. Form Approved nuo r.i., ea_01eio U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1. NAME. OF APPLICANT CITY OF EDINA Z,- APP LICATtPN /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY I 4, [M ORIGINAL (each year) ❑ REVISION, DATED FROM TD 1979 1980 ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER Ho . using Rehabilitation I S. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT City of Edina ). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Continued Relevance 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER 927 -8861 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This project is a continuation of a project initiated,in Year I of the CDBG Program. The program's operation will remain the same as in Year IV. Housing Rehabilitation Deferred Loans will continue to be available city -wide, but with special emphasis in census tracts 231, 235.01, and 238.02. The City will continue to utilize Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MHFA) loan and grants to compliment CDBG funds. The project is of direct benefit to low and moderate income groups. ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACTS) /ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) City-Wide 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES ( Listeomponentactiviriesusingnamesofactivitiesshown PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in mousands of S) CDBG OTHER Low /MoD BENEFIT OTHER AMOUNT BENEFIT SOURCE in Part A, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUD•7067.) (al (bl (c) (d) (el Housing Rehabilitation 530.0 S S; 100-0 Minn. HFA Rehab Administration 5.0 I 14. Totals 1 530.0 1 55.0 IS 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) S35.0 Replaces Form HUU•/Uj7.I. wnicn 13 wbUICLC rage of pages Form Approved OMB No. 63•R1619 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 1. NAME OF APPLICANT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM CITY OF EDINA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER PROJECT SUMMARY 3.- PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4 ORIGINAL reach yearJ FROM TO ❑ REVISION, DATED 1979 1980 C3 AMENDMENT, DATi =O 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Handicapped Access Under Review 8. ENTITY WItk RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER Cit of Edina 927 -8861 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Planning activities, designed to allow access and free movement by handicapped individuals to and within City Hall were budgeted in Year IV of the CDBG.progra Year V funds will.be used to cover the cost of remodeling the entrance to City Hall, restrooms,.and door openings in City Ball to allow handicapped access.to City services. Presently,.offices and services in the City Hall are not accessible to handicapped individuals This project is assumed to directly benefit low and- moderate income persons. ❑ Check if continued on additional pages) and attach. 11."CENSUS TRACTS) /ENUMERATION OISTRICT(S) 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS" . This project is designed to provide access to and movement within the City Hall by handicapped and physically disabled persons. ❑ Check if continued on additional paoe(s) and attach. 13. COBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS tin thousands o1S) (List component activities using names o/ activities shown CDBG I OTHER in Part A, COSTSUMMARY, Form HUD-7067.J LOW /MOD I OTHER I SOURCE BENEFIT BENEFIT AMOUNT la) I (b) (c) (d) r @J Handicapped Access 550.0 S 5150.0 City 14. Totals 1 550.0 IS : I.S150.0 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Develocment Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns b and c) S 50. 0 HUD -7066 16.78) Replaces Form HUD - 7015.1, wn,cn is C:osolete Page of pages Form Approved OMB No. 63•R1619 U.S.• DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 1.. CITY OF PEDANT 2. APPLICATION/GRANT NUMBER- _ PROJECT SUMMARY 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4. ® ORIGINAL (each year) ❑ REVISION, DATED FROM TO 1979. 1980 ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED 5. NAME OF PROJECT 6. PROJECT NUMBER Comprehensive Plan Preparation S. ENTITY WITH RESPONSIBILITY FOR CARRYING OUT THE PROJECT 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATUS Exempt 9. TELEPHONE NUMBER 10. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Funding for preparation of a Comprehensive Land Use Plan for the City of Edina began in Year IV of the CDBG program. The project is a result of requirements. of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976. Year V funds will,, primarily, be used to complete the housing section, to review the City's official controls and ordinances, and to establish policies in all mandated areas. This project benefits the community equally. ❑ Check if continued on. additional pages) and attach. 11. CENSUS TRACT(S1/ENUMERATION DISTRICT(S) Not Applicable 12. ANTICIPATED ACCOMPLISHMENTS - A comprehensive land use plan to guide development and redevelopment in the City and•a guide to City coordination with metropolitan systems. ❑ Check if continued on additional page(s) and attach. 13. CDBG COMPONENT ACTIVITIES, (List component activities using names of ecririties shown PROGRAM YEAR FUNDS (in thousands of$) CDBG OTHER LOW /MOD I OTHER I AMOUNT BENEFIT BENEFIT SOURCE in Pan A, COSTSUMMARY, FormHUO.706'7.1 (a1 IN (cl (d) (el Comprehensive Plan Preparation 5 S 10.0 55.0 JLocal 14. Totals I S ., 1,S 10.,0 'S 15. Total Costs To Be Paid With Community Development Block Grant Funds (Sum of Columns band c) S 10.0 Replaces Form HUU•/uIq.I, wnicn is uosoicie raga VI Pagca Form Approved OMR No. 63 RI U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING PLAN SUMMARY THREE YEAR PROJECT SUMMARY �. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4• NAME ANT 1. OF APPLIC ® Original (Every three yeersl CITY_ OF EDINA [] Revision. dated �. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER From: 1979 To: 1982 r Amendme,lt,ilated TIMING AND ESTIMATED FUNDING (in tltnusands of$1 5. MMARY PROJECT SU $ b U PROGRAM BENEFIT OF ESTIMATED CDBG FUNDS T E R F L O YEAR 1 YEAR II YEAR III ESTI- (IMPORTANT. See instructions before PROJECT NUMBER T a w T OTHER LOW /MOD OTHER MATED OTIIER completing this section.) G N O LOW /MOD BENEFIT OTHER BENEFIT LOW /MUD BENEFIT BENEFIT BENEFIT BENEFIT FUNDS Y C •, E D G � -id—) 111 lyl N 111 If1 Ik) 111 In.l lal lal 10 (cl Land Acquisition - Low & Mod. Income X 95 105 145 Housing City -wide Handicapped Access - City Hall X 50 150 Housing Rehabilitation - City -wide X 35 35 35 300 Morningside School Redevelopment - Morningside Area X 50 40 Special Assessment Relief - City -wide X 10 50 50 Comprehensive Planning X 10 5 Handicapped Access - City -wide X 20. 20 40 I $240 Is 10 x250 s 0 5250 ::_$2 G. SUBTOTALS S 7 7. TOTAL COSTS TO BE PAID WITH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OLOCK GRANT FUNDS S 7 B. ESTIMATED E)WVNDITURES 9ENEFITTING LOW-AND MODERATE - INCOME PERSONS (Surn of column 1 and k) 9. LINE B AS A PERCENT OF LINE 7 Pape of Pap�i 10 E8.7 'X IIU0 -7066 (6 -7B) Form Approved OfAS No. 63-R1619 • 1. DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT NAME OF APPLICANT - CITY OF EDINA _ - ANNUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM - 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER - COST SUMMARY 3, PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4. ® ORIGINAL (ea:h year) _ FROM TO ❑ REVISION, DATED ❑ AMENDMENT, DATED 1980 1979 PART A. SUMMARY OF PROGRAM ACTIVITY FOR HUD AMOUNT USE ONLY Line (important: See instructions before classifying costs.) - � Acquisition of Real Property $95,000 $ • 2 Disposition • 3 Public Facilities and Improvements x a Senior Centers b Parks, Playgrounds and Other Recreational Facilities 50,000 c . Centers for the Handicapped d . Neighborhood Facilities e Solid Waste Disposal Facilities f Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment 8 Parking Facilities h Public Utilities, Other Than Water and Sewer Facilities I Street Improvements j I Water and Sewer Facilities k Foundations and Platforms for Air Rights Sites Pedestrian Malls and Walkways rn Flood and Drainage Facilities Specially Authorized Public Facilities and Improvements (List) I n S . 0) (2) (3) 4 I Clearance Activities ' 5 I Public Services I 6 Interim Assistance 7 Completion of Previously Approved Urban Renewal Projects Huoaoe� 16•�al Replaces Form HUD-7015.5. wn,ch is Obsolete Page I of pages rage : of pages *,Special Assessment Relief AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY B Relocation Payments and Assistance S $ 9 Payments for Loss of Rental Income 10 .'''' Removal of Architectural Barriers 50,000 11 Specially Authorized Assistance to Privately Owned Utilities 12 Rehabilitation and Preservation Activities a Rehabilitation of Public Residential Structures b Public Housing Modernization c Rehabilitation of Private Properties *01000 35,000 d Code Enforcement e Historic Preservation 13 Specially Authorized Economic Development Activities a Acquisition for Economic Development b Public Facilities and Improvements for Economic Development C Commercial and Industrial Facilities 14 Special Activities By Local Development Corporations, Etc. (List! a S b C d 15 SUBTOTAL 240,000 16 Planning and Urban Environmental Design (See Part B of Ois form.) a Development of a Comprehensive Community Development Plan b Development of a Policy-Planning-Management Capacity e Specially Authorized Comprehensive Planning Activities 17 General Administration (From Part C, Line 61 10,000 18, Contingencies and/or Local-Option Activities Wor to exceed 10% of amount shown in Part D, Line 11 19 I TOTAL PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 15 through 18) S 250 000 1 S rage : of pages *,Special Assessment Relief rage ) 01 - pages Page 4 °ot pages HUD -7067 16781 Lime I PART D. BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS AMOUNT FOR HUD USE ONLY 1 Entitlement Amount S 250.000 S 2 Less: Repayment of Urban Renewal /NDP Loans (Attach Schedule) S 3 Grant Withheld for Repayment of HUD - Guaranteed Loan S 4 Grant Amount For Program Activities (Line 1 minus sum of Lines 2 and 3) S 250,000 S 5 Program Income $ ----- $ S. Surplus From Urban Renewal /NDP Settlement $ _ _ $ 7 Loan Proceeds . S - - --- $ B Reprogrammed Unobligated Funds From Prior Program Year (Attach Schedule) S $ 9 TOTAL BLOCK GRANT RESOURCES FOR PROGRAM COSTS (Sum of Lines 4 thru 8). S 250,000-1 I, S Line PART E. SUMMARY OF•PROGRAM.BENEFIT AMOUNT FOR HUD .,USE.ONLY 1 Costs Subject to Program Benefit Rules $2405000 S 2 Expenditures Principally Benefitting Low- and Moderate- Income Persons S 240 000 $ 3 Line 2 as a Percent of Line 1 100 % % 4 I Other Expenditures S 102000, $ 5 Line 4 as a Percent of Line 1 Page 4 °ot pages HUD -7067 16781 JMF3 NO. 63•a la r U.S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 8L6CK GRAN-,- PAOGRAM ( CITY OF EDINA ' CATION /GRANT NUMBER HOUSING ASSISTANCP PLAN Z. APPL 1 CHECK IF APPLICANT WISHES TO REVIEW ALL STATE HFOA HOUSING-agOPOSALS: TABLE III • THREE YEAR HOUSING PROGRAM $ THREE YEAR GOAL f 4• ® ORIGINAL 3. PERIOD OF APPL1CA81LITY FROM TO I ❑ REVISION, DATE 1979 1982 ❑ AMENDMENT. DATE= NUMBER OF LOWErR' INCOME HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED ELDERLY TYPES AND SOURCES OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE (1.'2.Dersonsl- SMALL FAMILY LARGE FAMILY TOTAL AND HANOI- (4 or less (5 or more CAPPED) Gersons) persons) (aJ (b) ( (cl j (d! (el 1 I A. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowner (sum of linos 2 and 5) 2 1. New Construction Assistance for Homeowners (sum of 3 and J) 30 I 25 5 3 HUD Assistea Programs 25 I 20 5 4 Other* 5 ! 5 5 2. Renabihtation Assistance for Homeowners i (sum of lines 6, 7 and dl 140 30 80- 30 6 Community Develooment Block Grants 60 20 I 30 10 7 HUD assisted Programs ! 8 Otr.er • 80 l 10 50 20 9 B. Total Goals ror i+ousing Assistance ror Homeowners ov 100% j % °'� ' Percentace of Household Tvice �27 .. 46 27 ..10 ` C. 70131 Voats !Or rousing •:ssist3nce ror Renters - I (sum of lines 11, 14, 17,1 2 3) 439 I 168 ! 181 90 1 1 1. Assistance for Prosoective Homeowners (sum of linos 12 + 131 121 HUD Assisted Programs 131 Omer' j 14 2- New Rental Units (sum of lines 15,0- 161 _ 298 i 128 100 j 70 _ 15 HUD Assisted Proarams I 161 Omer* 17 3. Rehabilitation of Rental Units I (sum of lines 18. 19 - 221 18! Community Ceveiooment Elock Grants ' - 1 19i HUD Assisteti Programs (sum of lines 20 + 21) 201 Substantiat Renaoiiitation 21 Section 3 Existing with 4looerate Renaoiiitation 221 Other' — - -- — 23 �. Existing nentat Units (sum of lines 24 + 27) 141 ( 40 1 81 20 24 HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines -25 + 261 ( i 25 with Reoair 1 i 251 Without Aeoair .141 40 81 20 27!.. Otn,fr 28; 0. Total 60ais 'or "ousinq 4ssistance •'or Ranters Ov � Percent3ae Of -4Ousa-nOlt1 -vCe 100% 38 0 41 21 7srai :cais 'Or ,^,V - I �CC� .� - ao 113 33 24 NARRATIVE !Arrach addiriona( she-_rs if.necessari and identify with items above! 1.. Footnote units to ne provided �oec:fically `or 'he handicaooed. • 2. Describe the orogiams iisted unrlar'this Caiegdrv. l 3. Describe those actions necessary to facliirate 'he accomolishment of the goals. CHECK IF APPLICANT WISHES TO REVIEW ALL STATE HFOA HOUSING-agOPOSALS: The Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, prepared specifically to facilitate the production of low to moderate income housing, remains largely undeveloped at this time. It is the intent of the City to pursue-development in this district for both families and the elderly. Proposals for the district will be carefully studied to avoid any impaction problems in the area. Homeowner- ship as well as rental housing are possibilities in the district. Due to the extremely high land costs existing at this time, the subsidies per, dwelling unit are high. Preliminary proposals indicate land write -down costs to be in the range of $2,000 — $4,500 per unit. Because of the high land costs in the City, the tax increment district in Southeast Edina presents the most feasible location for subsidized housing projects. However, if the number of units provided is not an issue, other locations can be considered. Table III includes a goal of 30 units for new ownership units. There is at this time an extreme shortage of moderately priced units in the City. The need to expand the choice in price range is obvious and the benefits desirable. However, existing programs offer inadequate solutions to this problem. Existing programs must be altered or new programs created in order to provide this housing. The goals listed in Table III assume that.�these changes will occur during the effective period of this HAP. If these changes :;do not occur, realization of this goal will not be possible. The City's HAP includes a goal of 128 units of .elderly housing. This -is., at present, the most urgent, unmet housing need in the:'City. Recent estimates of the City's population indicate that over 20 percent of the-population is over 62 years old. Although the City would consider any project location.near necessary support services, the preferred locations are at 51st and France Avenue and in the Southeast Edina Tax Increment District. The City's 3 -year HAP proposes to continue existing programs designed to rehabilitate private residential properties. CDBG funds would be coordinated .with MHFA programs to provide rehabilitation..assistance to low to moderate income.homeowners in Edina. Funds would be- available city -wide but efforts would concentrate in census tracts 231, 235.01, and 238.02. The City of Edina-is presently allocated 47 units of HUD Section 8 rental assistance for each of the years in the three year period. If adjustments are made to reflect prevailing rents at less than.the regional level, this program may become viable in the City. OF ANZ :,ARAN Z)EV—: ZN•: • -, 1. NA.-v,.T C,-',Ao-PL:CkNT Reolaces F-jrrn HIJU4015.1 1. vnirm -1 Obsolete HU0.1094 6.731. COMMUNt"ry 3Z1e=LOPM4EN-' JL.CCX ZAANT ?Ftr_, AAM CITY OF EDINA HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN 2.' APPLICATIONIG PANT NUMBER TABLE IV GcNERAL LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED HOUSING 131 1 1 1 — 1. 1 1 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY 4, ❑ ORIGINAL FROM TO ❑ REVISION, LATE 1979 1980 ❑ AMENOMENT, GATE- A. IDENTIFY GENERAL LOCATIONS ON MAP INTHIS APPIJCATION wl 1. New Construction: Census Tract or Enumeration District Numbers, or other locational designItion 236, 240.02 2. Rehabilitation: Census Tract or Enumeration-District Numbers, or other locational designation City–wide but especially 231, 235.01, and 238.02 S. EXPLANATION OF SELECTION OF GENERAL LOCATIONS 1, New Construction SEE HAP NARRATIVE 2. Rehabilitation ..SEE HAP NARRATIVE Reolaces F-jrrn HIJU4015.1 1. vnirm -1 Obsolete HU0.1094 6.731. 'U.S. OE_?AA7MiE.V-, MOUSING r �.aN e•cvcLG ?aic,VT • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BL3CK GRANT GROGRAM HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN TABU V • ANNUAL HOUSING ACTION PROGRAM ANNUALGOAL 3. PERIOD OF APPLICABILITY F ROM TO W11 1980 CITY OF EDINA 2. APPLICATION /GRANT NUMBER ". 4. IX] ORIGINAL ❑ REVISION, DATE ❑ AMENDMENT, DATE TYPES AND SOURCES OF HOUSING ASSISTANCE UMS No. o3 -r7 -s NUMBER OF LOWER- INCOME-HOUS- cHOLOS TO BE ASSISTEC ELDERLY SMALL LARGE I (dl (1.2Oersonsl FAMILY FAMILY TOTAL AND I I ! HANDI• (4 or less 1 (5 or more CAPPED I Oer'sonsl persons/ i,,NARRATIVE iA r3cn arrc:rronai sneers if necessary .3no %cen,rfy wr,n ftefns 30ovel J 1. Footnote units io'he provided soecific311v for *.hq 4andiC3noed. • 2. Describe the orogr;ms listed under ;his Category. 3. Describe those 3c:i(:ns necessary :o facilitate the accomoiishment-of ihe.goals. 1 Incremental Year or Submission Tahles 1, II and IV of the Three Year HAP aporovpd _ a,a _ _ -- - --- -0+ 2 3 incoroorated by re•iprence and are not contained in this • (Seconr7) (thir'r71 ,/Par ,litimisslf r, .- �•�wrrVS.�nirron .a r�hsnlern - (a1 fbl ..- 1 (cl I (dl le! 1 ' j(sum A. Total Goals for Housing Assistance for Homeowners of lines 2 and 5) I I ! 2 1. New Construction assistance for Homeowners (sum of lines 3 and 41 1 3 1 HUD Assisted Programs 4 1 Other* i 5 2. Rehabilitation Assistance for Homeowner (sum -of lines 6, 7 and 8) 55 20 18 I 8 _ 1 30 10 ! 7 2 - 6 ! Community Development 31ock Grants _ _ 7 I HUD Assisted Programs 8 Other M11FA Loans Grant 35 ' 10 20 ! 5 r 9 18. Total Goals for Housing assistance For Renters (sum of lines 10. 13, 16 and 22) i - 10 1. Assistance for Prosoecnve Homeowners (sum of lines 11 - 121 t t HUD Assisted Proorams 12 Other• j ' 13 2. New Rental Units _ f (sum of lines 14 and 151 98 I 28 + 50 j ! 20 14 i HUD Assisted Programs 98 28 50 _ ! 20 t5 Other• 1 16 1 3. Rehabilitation of Rental Units 1 (sum of lines 17, 18 and 211 -77 1 I ! r Community Development 31oc c Grants l i 18 ! HUD Assisted Programs (sum of lines 19 -620) 19 Substantial Rehabilitation Section 8 Existing with Moderate Rehabilitation 4 ! ; 21 Other* i 22 l 4, Existing Rental Units (sum of lines 23 + 251 23'- HUD assisted P•oarams (sum of lines 24 +25) 24 With Repair :5 � - - -- - - - -- Without Reoarr .. .. -_._ _ ... - - - - - - - - �F I I I } I 47 47 _ .. - -. . —i_ . -- -• - � -• •- - --• 47- - - 1 - - - - -- - - 47 -- - J- - i,,NARRATIVE iA r3cn arrc:rronai sneers if necessary .3no %cen,rfy wr,n ftefns 30ovel J 1. Footnote units io'he provided soecific311v for *.hq 4andiC3noed. • 2. Describe the orogr;ms listed under ;his Category. 3. Describe those 3c:i(:ns necessary :o facilitate the accomoiishment-of ihe.goals. 1 Incremental Year or Submission Tahles 1, II and IV of the Three Year HAP aporovpd _ a,a _ _ -- - --- -0+ 2 3 incoroorated by re•iprence and are not contained in this • (Seconr7) (thir'r71 ,/Par ,litimisslf r, .- �•�wrrVS.�nirron .a r�hsnlern - TABLE V - NARRATIVE Assistance to homeowners with low to moderate incomes continues to be the most cost effective approach to housing assistance in Edina. The City proposes to continue existing rehabilitation programs that,.utilize CDBG and MHFA funding. Loans and grants will continue to be available city -wide. The Annual Housing Action Program proposes the construction of 98 units of new rental housing - 28 of the units would be elderly and 70 units would be new subsidized family housing. Preferred locations are: 51st and France for the elderly project, and the Southeast Edina Tax Increment District for the family housing. Table V also includes a goal of 47 units of Section 8 existing rental assistance. Due to the high rent structure of the City, this program has experienced little success in Edina. If, however, allowances are made for local conditions the program could become a viable tool in the city housing strategy. •7 ' f }�• ® u' I i I i1�117(��1 —• _.�- r IILLIAI If ,il1 E D I H A It l;tjl � � t 1..: j-� tll� Ili 1�`• j_ P L�� y � t "j,� -,+ ". � � �" � - -- ca (---'� 1.�� .L .- '��:- : ;��" � _�•�. rl i t >,...� J � �l I,,; _ 51= T � - k oc� - �' f 1. ( _ L •�.,.,. I .' � /�`�- ���:�- _ 4� —, c r ♦ ": fj' I I 1 ' I aan f. Y..C\OI� '•�� a •1 �� ^may �_ �' '" � ^1�,'-�_ � 4l } - -.l i •^ a •. � � - � I .r� + .� r.�:.a x�oo.� I4� 1 1, _l� — �•' -1`A � mil. t �t -� e - - -a 1 "��l �l �; 6 ; �� f I I � I•I ( �u:n'r>.c+h_ T' j � _�-�,_ L... -..�', [} '�S/ \y ,_� ''•` � �.�,� �t,��,s -�. _ , f� ., I�,,I I,I, �i'�4�,(�I.I�I,IR {f( { rr- ot� �.. ice► �? i' I I I I _ �I I � � --•t. _ _ E- 1/� \4'�, ,!:`� ♦ °o' -' � ' �,{ r ' t r•t t I f j I, / 1 �, .... { � •_.' - �.r-:rr -tomn�I It • - •I - � - 1 � _. � -_-. 1`.�� �:: �: T' t 111 � !. 1 . 1 .j'. crun ..K! s ....• �' � - { �( �i jI - � - :� - -- �f �..1 aa_I��t � � - -°�� a °-'`,>� --°- _-�, ,ax.,,_��� t_ �_ ___ •.,'a �.�TTTS. jTTT��; I °? 1 1 •,off /: ( �_ �� I �p�..�' .: ►, " �' —f IL 9 � 1. J _ .. _... i - - - c_ _ '•- -- - - - -: � � � _ :.: _ is �� r Proposed Locations For New Constructions _ 1 I ..Minnesota Pollution Control Agency VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Re: Proposed Reissuance of NPDES Permit No. MN0003468 Allied Central Stores, Inc. - Donaldson's Southdale Shopping Center - Edina, Minnesota Dear / / Postmaster: Dear � Mayor (or Chief Administrative Officer): JAN 12 1979 THIS IS AN OFFICIAL REQUEST OF THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY THAT YOU POST THE ENCLOSED PUBLIC NOTICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: The Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq. (P.L. 92 -500) and Minnesota State Regulation WPC 36, Section (h), provide for opportunity for public hearing on National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits for the discharge of pollutants. State reau- lation WPC 36 provides for public notice of every application, and states:. "(h) Public Notice of Permit Application and Preliminary Determinations. (1) Circulation of the Public Notice. . . The Director or the Agency shall circulate the notice in one or more of the following ways: (aa) Posting of the notice in the post.office or public libraries, buildings, places, etc., located within the designated geographical area. . ." Accordingly, we submit the enclosed public notice for posting in the / / Post Office in your municipality. City, Town, or Village Hall. We request that the notice.be Dosted on the date referenced in the notice and that it remain posted for thirty days. Any questions concerning this matter should be addressed to Ms. Terry Mader at (612) 296 - 7381. Yours truly, J ticnard - "valld-c) , P.E. Chief, Permits Section Division of Water Quality Enclosure Phone: 1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Regional Offices Duluth /Brainerd /Detroit Lakes /Marshall /Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer - C:` Permit No: MN 0003468 PUBLIC NOTICE or -the NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPDES) AND STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERMIT PROGRAM (Section 402, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, AS AMENDED, Minnesota Statutes Chapters 115 and 116 as amended and Agency Regulation WPC 36) Proposed NPDES and State Disposal System Permit to Construct Wastewater Treatment Facilities and /or to Discharge into Waters of the State Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1935 West County Road 62 Roseville, Minnesota 5511.3 Attn: Permits Section. Public Notice No: Public Notice.Issued On: 94I -008 JAN 15 1979 Name and Address of Applicant: Name and Location of Facility: Allied Central Stores, Inc. Donaldson's 80 S. Seventh St. Southdale Shopping Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 66th St. & France Ave. S. Edina, Minnesota Receiving Water: Unnamed pond adjacent to and East of Lake Cornelia NOTICE: The above named applicant has applied for reissuance of an existing Permit to construct wastewater treatment facilities and /or to continue to discharge into the designated receiving water. The permit will be reissued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for a term ,.of approximately 5 'years. Upon issuance, this reissued permit will supersede the existing permit that will expire March 31, 1979. The principal activity at the facility is mercantile retail sales. All sanitary wastewater is discharged to the municipal sanitary sewer. The permitted discharge is a seasonal flow of air conditioner non- contact cooling water at an average rate of 390,000 gallons per day and a maximum rate of 490,000 gallons per day.'The flow discharges to a storm sewer which leads to an unnamed pond northwest of the intersection of W. 66th St. and France Ave. S., Edina. Applicable terms and conditions of the permit are based on Minnesota Regulations WPC 14 and 24. Effluent monitoring during the term of the existing permit indicates that the Permittee should be in compliance with applicable effluent limitations of the reissued permit. The location of the facility is shown on the attached map. CIA Date: 5 1979 ;'!!!' - Permi t No: MN 000346$ 11, rN Trix ��'l' • �_ .�_.. � � �_. �.)� -... _.rte r �� ;F" ,�� c4 -:��iv ' : - y�• 'x`.111 ' - "• .. �� /�' :�a I•.� ` �l 1. i .. ' i �q s G1 ST son ,! - INE LL:..WATLR 4AM "0 iV K- 5 UT �•. . AA b� — -3pn- Date: .;AN 15 1979 Permit No: MN 0003468 "Pursuant to the waiver provisions authorized by 40 CFR Part 124.46, this proposed permit is within the class, type and size for which the Regional Adminis- trator, RegionV, has waived his right to review, object or comment on this pro- posed permit action." On the basis of preliminary staff review and application of applicable standards and regulations, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency proposes to reissue a permit for construction and continuation of discharge subject to certain effluent limitations and special conditions. Any construction that may be required in the existing permit or in the proposed permit may not be commenced until the plans and specifications are approved by the Director. The proposed determination to reissue-the permit is tentative. Interested persons are invited to submit written comments upon the proposed discharge. Interested persons may also petition for a public hearing in accordance with Agency Regulation WPC 36 (k) (1). Comments or petitions for public hearings should be submitted in person or by mail no later than thirty (30) days after the public notice of this application is issued. Deliver or mail all comments or petitions for public hearing to: Ms. Terry Mader Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 1935 West County Road B2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 The application and notice numbers should appear next to the above address on the envelope and on each page of any submitted comments. All comments received no later than thirty (30) days after the public notice is issued will be considered in the formulation of final determinations. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency will issue final determinations in a timely manner after the expiration of the Public comment period. Public notice of the plans and specifications is discretionary with the Director, but in all cases a letter notice will be sent to all persons who indicate an interest in--the-plans and _spec f_ica.tions. —: The application, proposed permit including proposed effluent limitations, special conditions, comments received and other documents are available for inspection and may be copied any time between 9:30 A.M. and 3:30 P.M., Monday through Friday. Copies of the Public Notice are available at the address shown above. If you have any questions regarding this proposed permit, please contact Stephen D. Riner (612) 296 -7217. Please bring the foregoing to the attention of persons whom you know would be interested in this matter. r TO: r,rcMhD A'KMTTKf Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, Public Health Sanitarian SUBJECT: Community Health Services Agreement DATE: January 12, 1979 V , v Enclosed you will find three copies of the 1979 Community Health Services Agreement between the City of Edina and Hennepin County. Basically, this agreement is the same as the agreements we have signed in the previous years with the exception of clause 2(b). This clause removes $1,200.00 from the cash subsidy to cover the costs of vaccines the State of Minnesota may supply for use in Edina during the calendar year-1979. Any differences in costs of vaccines whether more or less than $1,200.00 will be reconciled by an addition or decrease in our annual subsidy for 1980. The attached annual expenditure report form will be used in reporting our expenditures for 1980 and copies for this purpose have already been made. Please have all three copies signed for return to Hennepin County. -) 1W David A. Velde Public Health Sanitarian DAV: jkt- ��� TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, Public Health Sanitarian SUBJECT: Community Health Services Agreement DATE: January 12, 1979 Enclosed you will find three - copies of the 1979.Community Health Services Agreement between the City of Edina and Hennepin County. Basically, this agreement is the same as the agreements we have signed in the previous years_ with,the.exception of clause 2(b). This clause removes .$1,200.00 from the cash subsidy to cover the costs of vaccines the State of Minnesota may supply for use in Edina during.the-' calendar year 1979. Any differences in costs of vaccines whether more or less than $1,200:00 will be reconciled by an addition or decrease in our annual subsidy for 1980. The attached annual expenditure report form will be used in reporting our expenditures for.1980 and copies for this purpose have already been made. Please have all three copies signed for return to Hennepin County. vfla4 PZ) tvm David A. Velde Public Health Sanitarian DAV:jkt AGREEPOENT No. 90049 THIS AGREEN'ENT is made and entered into by and between the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, A -24 Government Center, 11inrr:.cpolis, Minnesota 55487, hereincfter referred to as the "County, cnd the City of Edina, Edina, Minnesota, hereinafter referred,to as the " Municipolity.,, WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality wishes to provide Community. Health Services under, the Community Heclth Services Act of 1976; and WHEREAS, funds are available from the Minnesota Department of Health for. the provision of Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the County wishes ,to support such services. NOW, ~-THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth herein, the County and the Municipality agree as follows: • - - I. TERM OF AGREEMENT The term of this Agreement shall_ be from January I, 1979, through December 31, 19790 This Agreement shall include the period July, I, 1.979, through December 31, 1979, _only , if the Community: Health Services Act is continued, fully funded by the State of Minnesota for the 1979 -1981 biennium and the . County receives the full amount of subsidy funds requested in the approved 1979 Hennepin County Community Heclth Services Subsidy Plan. If such funds are not available to allow for funding during the period July I, 1979, 'through December 31, 1979, this Agreement shall be cancelled upon written notice -from the County;, such cancellation to be effective as of July I, 1979. 2. CONDITIONS OF COUNTY SUPPORT a. The County agrees to make payments to the Municipality in reimbursement for the provision of Community Health Services as described in the 1979 Community Health Services Subsidy Plan,. hereinafter referred.to as "Plan,!' written pursuant to Minnesota Laws 1976, Chapter 9, a copy of which is on file. at the Hennepin County Community Flecith Cepartrrent, 501 Pcrk Avenue South, 4th Floor. The Plan Is incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. b. The 1�4unicipality_ agrees to use its Community Health Services subsidy to offset 3.7 percent of the cost of vaccines supplied by the klinnesoto Department of Health to Hennepin County agencies