HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979-05-21_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAI: hIEE'1'ING
MAY 21, 1979
ROLLCALL
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Acting City
Clerk. Presentation by City Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. If
Council wishes to proceed, 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
* A. Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. P- LS -9 -B
II. REPORTS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by
Acting City Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard.
Zoning Ordinance requires offering.of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading-should be waived. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Buildable Lots.and Flood Plain Permits require 3/5 favor-
able rollcall vote to pass.
A. Don Berg Construction Company - Generally located North of the Crosstown
Highway and West of the MN &S Railroad tracks and South of Valley View Road
1. Zoning Change.- R -1 Residential District to PRD -2 Planned Residential
District - Z -79 -3 (5/2/79)
2. Preliminary Plat Approval - S -79 -6. (5/2/79)
III. AWARD OF BIDS AND QUOTES Tabulations and Recommendations by City Manager.
Action of Council by Motion.
* A. Traffic Control Logs
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
* A. Folke R. Victorsen - Timbers Sanitary Sewer
* B. Lawrence R. Mozis - Parking of Recreational Vehicles
* C. Ms. Adele Rothman - McCauley Trail Bus Service
* D. Mr. & Mrs. Louis Durenberger - Permission to have Three Dogs
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 16, 1979
B. Colonial Church Parking Lot 100% Petition (Continued from 5/7/79)
C. Saints Valley View Roller Skating Center Dance Hall Permit (Continued from
5/7/79)
* D. Correction of Minutes of 4/16/79 - Dewey Hill R.L.S.
* E. M.H.F.A. Home Improvement Grants
* F. Auto Licenses
G. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
H. Post .Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
VI. 'RESOLUTIONS
* A. Radar Units
VII. FINANCE
A. Motion of , seconded by for payment of the fol.lowing
claims as per Pre -List: General, $237,824.9+x; Park, $13,956.47; Edina Art
Center, $2,302.69; Park. Construction, $109,767.00; Swimming Pool,
$979.13; G014 Course, $10,357.24; Arena Center, $8,758.07; Gun Range,
$080.83; Water fund, $18,879.84; Sewer 1'und, $6,482.35; liquor Fund,
$187,749.70; Construction, $51,303.95; Total_, $649,048.21
�(o � �� Yo4✓ thr.
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
REGULAR MEF..YING
MAY 21, 1979
ROLLCALL'
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Acting City.
Clerk. Presentation by• City Manager and.Engineer. Spectators heard.. If
Council wishes to proceed, 4/5 favorable rollcall vote.to pass.
A. Sanitary Sewer Lift Station No. P- LS -9 -B
II. REPORT AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by
Acting City Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard.
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot
Divisions, Plats,-Buildable Lots and Flood Plain Permits require 3/5 favor-
able rollcall vote to pass.
A. Don Berg Construction Company - Generally located North of the Crosstown
Highway and.West'lof the MN &S Railroad tracks and South of Valley View Road
1. Zoning Change - R -1 Residential District to PRD -2 Planned Residential_
District - Zi 79 -3 (5/2/79) �e�crKd =fiaK folcnn«•�
2. Preliminary Plat Approval - S -79 -6 (5/2/79) b111M7- bacK_tp
B. Final Plat Approval
1. Halla Enterprises Registered Land Survey -• Generally located South
of Eden Ave.; nest of Willson Road and East of T.H. 100
S -79 -2 (CC 4%2/79) -A= —__( a, {- Gore- cwr<<f7,cl�co:� ot- .�?u °(kt•r
III. AWARD OF BIDS AND QUOTES Tabulations and Recommendations by City Manager.
Action of Council byiMotion.
A. Traffic Control Logs
:app Y �
IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
c c— UicfDY�L r
A. Folke R. Victorsen - Timbers Sanitary Sewer - +`- (pt� -L
B. Lawrence R. Mozis - Parking of Recreational
PrV
—
C. Ms. Adele Rothman -McCauley Trail Bus Service
D. Mr. & Mrs. Louis Durenberger Permission to have Three Dogs
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic.Safety Committee Minutes .of May 16, 1979
B. Colonial Church Parking Lot 100% Petition (Continued from 5/7/79)L
C. Saints Valley View Roller Skatinpg Center Dance Hall Permit (Continued from
5/7/79) P"'^ J- �' -6 -c— ranted /Ga C�.0 �z a'L�- (7_i�.lrbRJrl_�— T= YR {y�c ✓n �nly cv— i`F1i= l =ffx%4 fCI
w�- k— c0ia7id -er GriAii�ri� l- r I
i q K12 Ll4s -�vn
D. Correction of Minuds of 4/16/79 - Dewey Hii R. S.
E. M.H.F.A. Home Improvement Grants_
F. Auto Licenses'_ Prrr< d— aban:d.�.��1= eF�c�t��- -30 -�/ -
G. Special Concerns of 'Mayor and ..Council
H. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
� ,_(3rd_e.nar ^ctw. p.vo:�►n:e K- �5= �' =�,� 'f tt-o n i cd�
VI. 'RESOLUTIONS
A. Radar Units -
VII. FINANCE
A. Motion of �c�n,�dl,{ seconded by 13redtse-, for payment of the following
claims as per Pre -List: General, $237,824.94; Park, $13,956.47; Edina-Art
Center, $2,302.69; Park Construction, $109,767.00; Swimming Pool,.
$979. -13; Golf Course., $10,.357.24.; Arena Center, $8,758.07; Gun Range.,
$686. -83; Water 'Fund, $18;879.84; Sewer Fund, $6,482.35; Liquor Fund,
$187,749.70; Construction., $51,303.95; Total, $649,048.21
pi'v esI• Met..
rtrms i t'o A -I-CA I 14 ti, k tr I
L / Krt/r.ly„ Woo 14"'Jl
f c.
, ke S[��OC.i�, +b esk -bl/SN
ox ?It,j? a t7h u j�. (ctl � QII e CCO fu�v r
3. e- (l,eil of Cow„c�� rac�'cis - 6e �f if not hon,� - C04 „0 {a
v10 +t�t� �l�rK�S a -F{(ce �f no`s' -fp be delwe�°,d .
I
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor and City Council
Rick Jacobson, Assistant Director, Park and.Recreation
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF.$1,000
May 16, 1979
Material Description (General Specifications):
d a
fi a���fi�0r
�s
ti
..Traffic control logs - 4000 feet of 6" X 6 "X 8' individual logs
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Page and Hi11 $3,625.00
2. Har -Ned Lumber $5,740.00
3
Department Recommendation:.
Recommend approval of quote to Page and Hill for 500 6" X 6" X 8' traffic control
logs for $3,625.00.
Parks R. R'QQrAAtiAR
�S u Depa rtment
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
y 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2.' I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Ros a d, City Mana*
t•r a9 , st I i ` � tiv00� �1LE
Al A P
/ EL- , H
HILLTOP 4�
i If J
t UTLEY
s CITY tiro y, c C
l C '7'�:1 ^'111 ,�'l'�••i '7 1' h� IC
HALL - I HALL 9 Pusu �/•� _ -,•i. ,
! :.'f 6POLICE�I8R4 /,ti a, ,r ,� -•1• ^j nZ'�1r �� ~'.1 �., ,'•''1�,
D EP T�
U Y •
it cli WORKS,
CENTER
/ - EDINA COUNTRY CLUB ,
OUR LADY r I:v
OF GRACE
CATHOLIC SCHOOL II;?'�,� t� "}n'►
ICH 0.
!. �v1 +, ?I• "' +1.�y'. r }�r'+i fist �ti.'.,,+"'1. "i. � �r�.r•.1 r �
,�'.h�.rr;ai�^r• b'aC,s��: �, tr -.� �a..���3�•�J�,,.i'7�� �'� ?- •.•'; -i •�' J'_ �.•',,
� , .. ,2.: �i.'i,A�- �•�� ?•^Y+ i i'� •��� � w. Pj�'�s -j.,* ^••1�Y') ; -'� �:]^ ►.1 °"r�r ,i
c r T q 5.ACF
subdivis
HALLA ENTERPRISES
REQUEST NLI51BER : S -79 -2
LOCATION: Tracts A, B, C, and D of RLS No.
390, and Tracts A and L of RLS
REQUEST: No. 1021.
N ORTI I
U 250 SUi) 750 1000
Jil-L'we ��+•...+r n .� i i;^• rr rr�t�
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT
February 28, 1979
S -79 -2 Preliminary Registered Land Survey for 1Ialla Enterprises.
Described as Tracts A, B, C, and D of Registered Land Survey
No. 390, and Tracts A and B'of Registered Land Survey.No.
1021. Generally located south of-Eden Avenue, west.of
Willson Road, and east of State Highway 100.
REFER TO: attached graphic
The Commission will recall that it considered a rezoning request by the
Kerr Companies from R -1 to 0 -2 Office for a portion of the subject pro-
perty several months ago.. This rezoning request subsequently was granted
first reading (i.e. preliminary approval) by the City Council. A hearing
is tentatively scheduled for March 19, 1979, to consider second reading.
In conjunction with this rezoning request,.a new registered land survey
for the subject property is proposed. This registered land survey will
divide the subject property into two parcels. The Perkins Restaurant
and.,parking lot will be located on Tract A. The proposed new office
building will -be located on Tract B.
• Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the requested registered land survey
conditioned upon
1. Final approval of the rezoning request presently pening before the
Council for Tract B of-the proposed R.L.S.
2. Subdivision dedication.
GLH: jkt
VIII
yr QUIVIh\ ... _
_.....
HALLA ENTERPRISES
__
IEDEN
..
I
AVE:'
- -128.79-
,
.
•
1
o'
7 fu
� a
I.L—ry 27. .979
' �
1
, ti
^°
`•
Ir lcaea ►ueelr of
�r•
-209.7$-
•
-
:ctv :r -a - 5.L9 a:r•-
a - 9:. ;`.:.i Sr.art Fee.
\g
-- •79.0-
�:1
7r,• r. r Y•,Sit ,_ifr talc
• 4
0
��C1 I I ^.1011
Tr,cc_ a, • v.a : !!w! ;_a:.1 .qr
.
L -:A A. a`.r•q _.,.a ary •
q
N
N
.
4
O
�.
V
,
-
tl
V
Y
Y
h l
•
V
s
I
,
'
'
O
I
I
�z,nr laceevs ecuarv.c�
.SOT Sufi \'FYS CC:,.; .1 t•:
.l
II. New Business:
✓ PC,
S -79 -2 Preliminary R.L.S. for Halla Enterprises, generally
located south of Eden Avenue, west of Willson Road,
and east of State Highway 100, described as follows:
Tracts A, B, C, and D of Registered Land Survey No.
390,.and Tracts A and B of Registered Land Survey
No. 1021.
Gordon Hughes asked the Commission to recall that it had
considered a rezoning request by the Kerr Companies from R -1 to 0 -2 Office
for a portion of the subject property several months ago. He continued to
note the rezoning request subsequently was granted first reading (i.e. pre-
liminary approval) by the City Council, and a hearing is tentatively set for
March 19, 1979, to consider. second reading.
Mr. Hughes indicated that in conjunction with this rezoning
request, a new registered land survey for the subject property is being proposed
to divide the subject property into two parcels, Tract A being the Perkins
Restaurant and parking lot, and Tract B consisting of the proposed office
site.
Staff recommended approval of the requested registered land
survey with the following conditions: that final approval of the rezoning
request presently pending before the Council for Tract B of the proposed R.L.S.
is granted, and that a subdivision dedication be received.
In response to Del Johnson's question as to why the condition
of approval of the rezoning was necessary, Gordon Hughes replied he•,felt this
should go through as a package, and if the rezoning did not go through and the
property should change hands there could be some problems in changing the zoning.
Gordon Johnson observed that the recommendation was made by Staff to streamline
the legal description of the property, and staff felt that it would be a good
time to do it in conjunction with the rezoning request. Mr. Hughes affirmed
that observation.was correct.
Gordon.Johnson asked Mr. Hughes what amount the Council was
considering in conjunction with the subdivision dedication. Mr. Hughes answered
that the Council was considering a fee of $16,000 which was an acceptable figure
to the Kerr Company.
Len Fernelius moved the Commission approve the R.L.S. request
with the two conditions recommended by staff: that final approval of the rezoning
request presently pending before the City Council for Tract B of the 'proposed
R.L.S. is granted, and that a subdivision dedication be received. Helen McClellnad
seconded the motion. All voted aye; the motion carried.
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL FOR
HALLA ENTERPRISES REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain Registered Land Survey located West of Willson Road, East of T.H. 100
and South of Eden Avenue, and presented to the Edina City Council by David M.
and Donald E. Halla at its meeting of May 21, 1979, be and is hereby granted
final approval.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and Acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 21, 1979, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of May, 1979.
Acting City Clerk
LOCATION MAP
zoning
s L;,,, v i s i on
DON BERG•CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
REQUEST NUMBER: Z -79 -3
LOCATION:
REQUEST: R -1 Single Family to R -5
Multiple Family District
XW2&- ann' lU dZgr1.I3ent village of edina
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
STAFF REPORT
May 2, 1979
Z -79 -3 Don Berg Construction Company. R -1 Single Family District
and to PRD -2 Planned Residential District.
S -79 -6 Generally located north of the Crosstown Highway and west
of the M & N Railroad Tracks.
REFER TO: attached graphics
The subject property measures two acres in area and is bordered on the
north by Valley View Road and on the south by the Crosstown Highway.
West of the subject property is a developed single family lot and to
the west of this lot is an undeveloped tract of land similar to the
subject property.
The Western Edina Plan recognized that the subject property as well as
the two parcels to the west represented a transactional area between
the Crosstown Highway and single family homes to the north. Therefore,
the Plan designated this area for "low density attached housing."
According to the Plan, such areas could accomodate single family cluster
housing, two family dwellings, townhouses and.apartments at a density
of 0 -4 units per acre.
The subject property exhibits several constraints for development.
First, the property abutts and is substantially lower than the Crosstown
Highway. Thus, it is subject to relatively high noise levels. Secondly,
the easterly half of the property is approximately 15 feet lower than
Valley View Road. Thus, a conventional development with single family
or two family dwellings fronting on Valley View Road would be difficult
without extensive filling. Also, due to the dimensions of the property
and its topography, it would be difficult to construct a cul -de -sac
serving individual lots.
The proponent is requesting a,rezoning of the subject property to PRD-2
Planned Residential District. According to the proposed plans, two six -
plex buildings would be constructed on the site. These buildings would
be oriented in a north -south direction in order to lessen the impact of
the Crosstown Highway as well as to reduce the exposure of the buildings
to the single family homes to the north. Access to the development would
be by way of a private drive from Valley View Road. Eight enclosed garage
stalls and four exposed stalls are provided for each building which is in
conformance with ordinance requirements. The setbacks proposed for the
buildings substantially exceed ordinance requirements.
Recommendation:
Staff believes that the proponent has proposed a development plan which
Community Development. Staff Report page 2
Z -79 -3 and S -79 -6
May 2, 1979
recognizes the constraints of the subject property. The proposed buildings
are oriented so as to lessen the impacts of the Crosstown Highway. The
proposed access to the development takes advantage of the site's topography
and precludes the necessity -for excessive filling.
Several aspects of the proposed.development lessen its impact to single
family dwellings on the north side of Valley View Road. First, the
north -south orientation of the buildings produces a less obtrusive visual
impact as compared to other possible orientations. Secondly, design
features of the proposed buildings including sloping roofs and conventional
building materials are similar to and compatible with single family homes
in the area. Thirdly, due to the topography of the site, the buildings will
be depressed from Valley View Road and will thus be less visible to dwellings
to the north.
Ideally, the subject property together with the two parcels to the west
could best be developed as one planned residential development. However,
in that the lot immediately to the west is already developed with a single
family.dwelling (which is in good condition) such a comprehensive develop-
ment plan is difficult to require. Due to the low density nature of this
area and adequate access, staff believes that each parcel could reasonably
be developed independently.
Staff would advise that according to the "Western Edina Land Use Plan, the
subject property should contain a maximum of four units per acre. The
proposed plan requests six units per acre. Although the proposed plan
maintains the low density character of the area and does not unduly crowd
the site, the Commission should consider the possibility of requiring two
four -plex buildings rather than two six -plex buildings.
Staff recommends preliminary zoning approval and preliminary plat approval
with the following conditions:
1) Final zoning is conditioned upon final platting.
2) Subdivision dedication.
3). An executed developers agreement
4) A grading permit from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
GLH:jkt
4/26/79
Ito
f,7
Is
Is
�1
30 5C.44.9
1
pe
:5/T6 i-oc,47-/o" MAP
7-VrA Z. 80,
/-or 40,
4-7- 40 92
C,W,VF".z — Lx--- PE 2
DONALD
5900 Y,41V-zE-N ROAD
ED /NA , f-7//\//Ve7:507A
pl7ono 9Z9-7730
L A N D s u 11 v E T 0 A s
C.,.d n .... .......
L
I.! Ti -L
Is
Is
�1
30 5C.44.9
1
pe
:5/T6 i-oc,47-/o" MAP
7-VrA Z. 80,
/-or 40,
4-7- 40 92
C,W,VF".z — Lx--- PE 2
DONALD
5900 Y,41V-zE-N ROAD
ED /NA , f-7//\//Ve7:507A
pl7ono 9Z9-7730
L A N D s u 11 v E T 0 A s
C.,.d n .... .......
L
�• -� o o _ _ �v 1
IL
r
a' t
.a
s�
i w, /.
1 � ✓
i
vim
`f
d
�. ..1:.......r _�\•\ �•� "i•� {Y� ,'�+ l
rb
- -. -• - - -__y �� I�' II I,I _! I • {I4.�.� �' _�i�� �II �� III I I�� �\ �V'�� (i!�1. � I -_ � --� �— - = ---
-- -- -3 ---- ^ —_'.�� �.�__- —��9 „•' -- _ t + � t � ; � ! . �h i ! F -{ -I �,� I ti �" Tom.•. -�- c- c., ,- _.._._ i Tai I i {t— + + _...... _.. � ..�_..�. - _ " _ - -•—.° — ^.. - --' .. �.
i; �:� I I i'_ !!' { II- �I I�T �II•II�I{Illi �!. I(I I� IIIIiI �i II � 'l l �I �� i t�� - ��..W ggi -. `
C7 � ~ �� �• .r l ��. � +��i ., d � � � }� `Vi..•f ,fit �.a -.I � i � �� ��
_ : — �= rc_= __r_:r..v__..__ � 3-.�_ ___ z�.,_ � �-. - - _- _ . _ � • +C.i►4:�tkw+. �„y�.r> LL.VI _�,,,...�.a,,.� s ..J•r.�' e .:.�.. ` .- ..-- --�- _— r..- --s.a. _�.� ...��[.� -- - -- - .....t ' .�-..� y ' ..
Edina Community Development and Planning Commission
May 2, 1979
page �
Frank Cardarelle showed the Commission the most recent
proposal for the Habitat and noted that while they needed plan approval from
the Hennepin County Highway Department, the Department of Natural Resources,
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, the Planning Commission and City
Council, he felt that everyone was generally favorable toward the plan and
preliminary concept approval should be granted. Mr. Hughes pointed out that
the DNR did have some problems with the plan that would have to be worked out.
Del Johnson asked how much power the DNR holds and if they would have the
ultimate decision as to approval of the plan. Frank Cardarelle explained
that he felt they were improving the natural habitat so subject to some changes,
the preliminary concept should be approved. He added that if the natural habitat
can be improved enough they would be allowed to do some filling.
In response to David Runyan's question as to how far the .
dwellings would be from Lincoln Drive, Mr. Cardarelle responded they would be
thirty feet from the property line to the building.
Mr. Dever,
Mr. Cardarelle had presented
owners but only a handful of
that those present found the
it was a definite improvemen
of the present proposal.
Director of Edina West Condominiums, noted that
the plan request to the Edina West Condominium
the 162 owners were present. However, he continued
proposal very desirable for the area and thought
L if approval is granted in something of the form
Bob Peterson of Edina West Condominiums was concerned with the
problem of the intersection, and Mr. Cardarelle responded that the intersection
could be changed and yet the same concept kept intact.
Richard Seaberg moved the Commission continue the request for
one month to work out more of the problems with the proposal. Helen McClelland
seconded the motion. All voted aye with Gordon Johnson abstaining. The motion
to continue the request carried.
Z -79 -3 Don Berg Construction Company. R -1 Single Family
and District to PRD-2 Planned Residential District.
S -79 -6. Generally located north of the Crosstown Highway
and west of the M & N Railroad Tracks.
Gordon Hughes indicated the subject property, two acres in
area, is bordered on the north by Valley View Road and on the south by the
Crosstown Highway; west of the subject property is a developed single family
lot, and to the west of this lot is an undeveloped tract of land similar to the
subject property. Mr. Hughes stated the Western Edina Plan recognized that the
subject property as well as the two parcels to the west represented a transitional
area between the Crosstown Highway and single family homes to the north, and
therefore designated the area for low density attached housing. He continued
that according to the plan, such areas could accomodate single family cluster
housing, two family dwellings, townhouses, and apartments at a density of zero
to four units per acre.
Edina Community Development and Planning Commission
May 2, 1979
page 6
Mr. Hughes explained that the subject property exhibits
several constraints for development in that the property abutts and is sub-
stantially lower than the Crosstown Highway, and is subject to relatively high
noise levels. Also, the eastern half of the property is approximately 15 feet
lower than Valley View Road which makes a conventional development with single
family or two family dwellings fronting on Valley View Road very difficult to
do without extensive filling. Finally staff felt that due to the dimensions of
the property and its topography, it would be difficult to construct a cul -de -sac
serving individual lots.
Gordon Hughes noted the proponent is requesting a rezoning of
the subject property to PRD -2 Planned Residential District and proposes to con-
struct two six -plex buildings on the site which would be oriented in a north -
south direction to lessen the impact of the Crosstown Highway and reduce the
exposure of the buildings to the single family homes to the north. He stated
that access to the development would be by way of a private drive from Valley
View Road with eight enclosed garage stalls and four exposed garage stalls
being provided for each building, which is in conformance with ordinance re-
quirements. Mr. Hughes pointed out that all the setbacks proposed for the
buildings comply with ordinance requirements.
Staff felt that the proponent had proposed a development plan
which recognized the constraints of the property, oriented the buildings so as
to lessen the impacts of the Crosstown Highway, and proposed access to the
development to take advantage of the site's topography and preclude the necessity
for excessive filling. Gordon Hughes indicated several aspects of the proposed
development which would lessen its impact on the single family dwellings on the
north side of Valley View Road included the north -south orientation of the
buildings to produce a less obtrusive visual impact as compared to other possible
orientations, design features including sloping roofs and conventional building
materials similar to and compatible with single family homes in the area, and,
due to the topography of the site the depression of the buildings from Valley
View Road making them less visible to the dwellings to the north.
Ideally, the staff felt the subject property together with
the two parcels to the west could best be developed as one planned residential.
development. However, Mr. Hughes cited that because the lot immediately to the
west is already developed with a single family dwelling, such a comprehensive
development plan would be difficult to require. Due to the low density nature
of the area and adequate access, staff believed that each parcel could reasonably
be developed independently but advised that according to the Western Edina Land
Use Plan the subject property should contain a maximum of four units per acre
rather than the six units per acre requested. Therefore, staff recommended the
Commission should consider the possibility of requiring two four -plex buildings
rather than two six -plex buildings in approving the preliminary zoning and
subdivision with the following conditions: that final zoning be conditioned on
final platting, that a subdivision dedication be made, that an executed developers
agreement be received, and that a grading permit be issued from the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District.
Edina Community Development and Planning Commission
May 2, 1979
page 7
Gordon Hughes introduced Don Berg, the proponent, who was
present to answer the Commission's..questions. Mr. Berg stated that he had
talked with some of the neighbors and had received some favorable feedback
on his proposed development. He also said he felt the development would benefit
the entire community and would blend in well with the area.
Shirley Stoddart of 6227.Westridge Boulevard pointed out that
while she thought the development plan was nice, she was.concerned about the
dangerous corner at Valley,View Road, and felt if 20 additional cars were added
on the site, a serious traffic problem would develop. She also stated that she
would rather see a four -plex developed on the site than the six -plex requested.
Raymond E. O'Shaughnessy, 6308 Valley View Road, indicated
that when he purchased his property the zoning for the site was R -1, and he
wished it to remain that way.
Dave L. Mona of 6328 Valley View Road indicated that his
property is the low spot in the area, and his concern was that the additional
surface area on the site would cause flooding or increased run -off onto his
property. Therefore, he requested that he be considered when the Engineering
and Planning Departments consider the ponding in the area.
Mr. Marion Van Someren of 6317 Valley View Road stated that
previously the land on either side of his lot had been vacant and now to.
suddenly have six families living 55 feet from his lot line did not appeal to
him. He indicated that he had talked with Mr. Berg to see if the proposed six -
plexes could be moved over 15 feet to save more of the trees and give him more
space, and Mr.. Berg said he would not object if the Planning Commission found
that acceptable.
In response to Jim Bentley's question as to whether there was
ever a water or drainage problem,on that site, Mr. Van Someren replied they had
never had a drainage problem. Mr. Berg also replied that there was good natural
drainage on the site.
Richard Seaberg asked Mr. Berg if he would be willing to go
with two four - plexes rather than two six - plexes as had been requested. Mr. Berg
answered that while he would rather have two six - plexes, he could also work with
two four- plexes..
James E. Voss of 6300 Valley View Road stated he would rather
see the property remain zoned single family. David Runyan explained to him that
with the property dimensions, five.single family homes could be placed.on that
site which would create additional driveways. Gordon Hughes added that from the
zoning standpoint there would be no problem for Mr. Berg to put five single family
homes on the site; however, he felt there would be topographical problems and
access problems.
Edina Community Development and Planning Commission
May 2, 1979
page 8
Richard Seaberg felt that Mr. Berg had done a good job of
using the established topography and also. considering the neighbors in his plan
but he felt that the Commission could only allow two four - plexes on the site.
Therefore based on the information staff had presented, he moved that the
Commission approve preliminary zoning and platting with the. conditions that
final rezoning be conditioned upon final platting, that a subdivision dedication
be made, that an executed developers agreement be received, that a grading permit
be issued from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and that the plans be
limited to two four -plex units. Del Johnson.secon.ded the, motion. All voted
aye; the motion carried.
Z -79 -4 Radisson South Amendment Plan. PC -2 Planned
Commercial Plan Amendment.
Gordon Hughes recommended the Commission continue this matter
for one month based on the proponent's request. David Runyan moved that the
matter be continued. Richard Seaberg seconded the motion. All voted aye; the
request was continued to the May 30, 1979 meeting.
LD -79 -5 Lot 1, Block 1, Gleason 3rd Addition.
Gordon Hughes explained that a two family dwelling is presently
under construction on the subject property, and that the proponent is requesting
a simple lot division to divide the property along the common party wall. He
also noted that independent sewer and water connections are being provided for
each unit. Therefore, staff recommended approval of the simple lot division.
Gordon Johnson moved that the simple lot division be approved
based on staff recommendation. James Bentley seconded the motion. All voted
aye; the lot division was approved.
III. Other Business:
Election of the 1979 officers for the Community Development
and Planning Commission, which had been continued from the previous meeting, was
held at this time. Gordon Johnson nominated Bill Lewis for the position of
Chairman of the Planning Commission. Del Johnson seconded the motion. Bill
Lewis was elected as the 1979 Chairman of the Community Development and Planning
Commission by unanimous ballot.
Richard Seaberg nominated Gordon Johnson for the position of
Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission. David Runyan seconded the motion.
Gordon Johnson was elected as the 1979 Vice Chairman of the Community Develop-
ment and Planning Commission by unanimous ballot.
�' 10*1,4
(612) 944 -2804
FOLKE R. - V. M. VICTORSEN
6440 INDIAN HILLS PASS
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435
May 8, 1979
Edina City Council
4801 W. 50th St,
Edina, Mn. 55424
Council Members:
In answer to one part of the memorandum given to the City
Council on May 7, 1979 by Dr. Glenn Lewis.
The sewer from Manhole $15 to Manhole #16 is solely for
Dr. Lewis. We could easily hookup the sewer for Lots
# 10, 15, and # 16 into Manhole # 15 or before it.
Lewis has a direct obligation to pay for this sewer extension
and the Manhole # 16. His general obligation is to pay his
proportional share of the rest of the lateral sewer to Gleason
Road.
If he does not agree to do this, � . then I propose that we eliminate
the portion of the sewer between Manholes # 15 and # 16.
I cannot understand why we should have to extend the sewer to
his land when he'll be the only one to use this part.
Yours truly,
Apartments • 7 Hi Center . Wilderness Point . Interior Decorating
Edina 9 Minnetonka 9 Borden Lake
i
Rough Draft
MEMORAINDUM
TO: Edina City Council
FROM: Dr. Glen Lewis
DATE: May 7, 1979
RE: Objections to Any Allocation of
Construction Costs to Dr. Lewis'
Property Because of the Construction
of Sewer and water by Mr. Victorsen in
the Plat of Timbers Subdivision
Mr. Victorsen has recently informed me that he is going to ask
the City Council to force me to pay a percentage of the
cost related to his construction of sewer and water to the
lots which he is subdividing in the Timbers Subdivision.
I object to any attempt by Mr. Victorsen and /or the city
to make me pay a percentage of Mr. Victorsen's business
expense in his quest to maximize his economic return and
profit on the property that he is subdividing for speculative
sale. Ply objections are based upon the following reasoning:
1. I purchased my property with the house on it in
1966. It had then and presently has an adequate on -site
septic system, and on -site well.
2. From 1971 through 1979, Mr. Victorsen has attempted
to develop the surrounding approximately 20 acres into small
lots to maximize his profits. It is my understanding that
. of these lotsl'e proposes to develop are approximately
CIO feet wide and 1 -U0 feet in depth. My lot is much wider
and much deeper than that and is approximately one acre in
size versus the minimum lot size ofi�,000 square feet for
his lots. It is my understanding that if Mr. Victorsen
had not chosen to put in municipal sewer and water, then
the lot size would have been 150 feet in width for at least
18,000 square feet in area, which even then would be much
smaller than.my lot of approximately 43,560 square feet.
If Mr. Victorsen wants to subdivide this land into such
smaller lots which then require sewer and water, why should
I have to pay for a cost for such improvements when those
improvements obviously have allowed him to double the number
of lots he can sell from this area at a greater profit to
him?
1,
3. I have not petitioned for sewer and water nor do
I have any need for it. In fact, I do not want to see
sewer and water with the resulting small lot sizes brought
into this area which will result in a diminution in value
to my property, increased traffic congestion and all of the
other disadvantages of such dense urbanized development.
4. Moreover, it is my understanding that Mr. Victorsen
has decided to use development option .A under the City
Subdivision ordinance which states that lie will put the
sewer and water in at.his cost and not petition to have
the city do it. How do I know that the cost that he is
allocating to the sewer and water arm their cost? For
all I know, lie is "burying" other costs into that segment
of the project because he knows he is going to argue to
the city that somehow the city should charges me for a portion
of his development costs?
5. The fact that my lot is adjacent to his proposed
lateral sewer and water pipes does not mean I should pay
for any cost thereof. The cost to the developer is the
same whether or o��,�f,,//,,my lot is there. He has to extend his
pipe across the X of my lot to service his lots across
the street from me and the lots further down the proposed
road and so, therefore, there is no additional cost to the
developer. If there is any additional cost to the developer
in my having to hook up to the sewer and water, it is just
the cost of trenching, into the ground and hooking up a
short pipe from the main laterals in the street to the
edge of my property. Those costs run approximately $200
to $300 and I do not object to.paying for the expense of
the extra construction of that stub pipe since that is not
an expense that the developer otherwise would incur. _
6. It is ray understanding that in the past, the
city has not been faced with a situation where the developer
proposes to put in the sewer and water at his expense and.
the developer thereafter demands that the.city charge back
some of the developer's cost against a lot owner in the
middle of a subdivision who was there prior to the subdivi-
sion. Why should the city ever do such a thing now?
7. In fact, I doubt that the city legally can force
this sort of "assessment" upon me without first following
all of the procedures as are set forth in Minnesota Statutes,
§429.01 et. seq. It is my understanding that before there
can be any sort of assessment against my property, there
should have first been a petition from the property owners
or a decision by the City Council to install such sewer and
-2-
r
water, then there should have been an order to the City
Engineer to develop a preliminary engineering report, then
there should have been a public hearing on that report,
then the City Council should have ordered the projects in,
thereafter, the City Council should have determined the
amount to have been assessed, directed the drafting of an
assessment roll, and provided adequate notice to all property
owners of our rights to listen to the proposed assessment
and contest same within 30 days after the adoption thereof.
I do not believe that any of these steps have been taken.
If the city is considering assessing my property for any
of the "benefits" from the construction of the sewer and
water, then the city must start at step 1 with all of the
various reports. It is impossible even for the.city to do
that at this time, because I believe all of the engineering
reports had been completed without the adherence to the
statutory provisions.
I have already suffered enough from the development of
this property. I have seen this area of the city go from
one of rural beauty to that of a densely urbanized area of
the city with the advent of this development with the small
lots which the subdivider proposes to develop. My existing
driveway, which has been adequate for me for years, has
been destroyed by the developer at.great inconvenience to
me and my family. At times I have had no access to my
property or my automobile, service vehicles or emergency
vehicles. I have repeatedly had to call City Hall so that
the city staff could force the developer to maintain adequate
access to my home. Why now should I have to pay for a per-
centage of the developer's windfall profits?
8. It is my understanding that the developer now
wants to readjust the platted cul de sac so that it is
approximately 40 feet closer to my property. His only rea-
son for adjustment, is to maximize the value on several of
the lots serviced by that cul de sac. Yet the moving of
the cul de sac closer to my driveway will just result in
more of a diminution in value to my property. I doubt
whether or not under Minnesota Statutes, 5462.358 the devel-
oper should be allowed at this late date to make such a
major change in his plat without first going through the
preliminary plat review procedure in front of the Planning
Commission and following through the steps of the Subdivi-
sion Ordinance.
9. In summary, I am willing to pay the additional
cost of having a stub built from the sewer and water line
in the street out to the boundary of my property. It is my
-3-
f �
understanding that the approximate cost would be $200 -$300.
I would appreciate knowing what the additional cost is
prior to the construction of'that hook-up. After the sewer
and water pipes are completed, these pipes will become
public utilities an then I will not have to burden the
city by opening the road with a trench in order to build
such a stub pipe in the future. Once I do hook up, I will
have to pay the SAC charge of approximately $425 and any
other charge related to the city's expense in reviewing my
hook -up. That is more than enough given the adverse impact
that this subdivision has had upon the value of my property
and enjoyment of the property by my family in the last
several months.
2 ^ i Ij -��
t.-w AIL
v� :fin
0
:8M V-F ST 50'11 SHIFET. EDINA. A 5`3-1;j
612 -927 -886; May 23, 1979
Mr. and Mrs. Lewis Durenberger
311 Madison Avenue
Edina, MN 55343
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Durenberger:
On May 21, 1979, the Edina City Council approved your maintaining three
dogs on your property. This approval was given by their authority under
Edina.City Ordinance No. 302.
I wish to remind you that if in the future you elect to relocate one or
more of, the dogs, or if and when one of the dogs passes on, you would
again be bound to the limitation of having no more than two dogs on
your property.
I
If you have any other.questions about this matter, feel. free to call
me or the Animal Control Officer, Nancy Riley.
Sincerely,-
r, I r
x L� {( .f /(�1'.l rr te_
L
David A. Velde
Public Health Sanitarian
Edina Health Department
DAV:jkt
cc: Nancy Riley, Animal Control Officer
O-c uc-1 - --cam -
- - - -- - - -- — - - - -cep
- - --
�p
- - - - - - - -- - -
0
r
W,:
-- - - - -- -- -- -- Z- /�,- A ?7.9 - -- - --
4L�
a
— — — - -o -- - -�- e 4 -
- - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- ----- - - - - -- -- - - -- - - --
�l �
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Fran Hoffman
SUBJECT: ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE
DATE: May 21, 1979
In reference to the Durenberger's request for permission to retain more
than two dogs at their residence, the following sections of the animal
control section of the City Ordinances are applicable:
ORDINANCE NO. 302
An Ordinance Regulating the Keeping of
Animals and Providing a Penalty.
Section 1. Every person who shall keep swine, cattle, horses, goats or
more than.two dogs in the Village nearer than 500 feet to any human
habitation without permission from the Board of Health, or who shall,
without permission, of the Board of Health, keep the animals above
described within 500 feet of real estate platted into lots and designated
as an addition, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and subject to a fine
of not to exceed $300, or imprisionment for a period not to exceed 90 days,
with costs of prosecution in either case to be added.
ORDINANCE NO. 311
An Ordinance Regulating and Requiring the Licensing
of Dogs and Commercial Animal Kennels, and Providing
for the Confinement of Dogs and Other Animals,
and Prescribing Penalties.
Sec. 17. Restrictions on Dogs.
(d) No more than two animals over six months of age shall be kept or
harbored at any place, except in a licensed pet shop or licensed animal
hospital.
The ordinances do to some degree conflict as No. 311 does not seem to provide
any leeway for permitting more than two animals while No. 302 provides a
method to permit such.
It is recommended that if the Council desires to permit more than two dogs
that it act as the Board of Health in accordance with the ordinance. If
No. 302 is the desired direction, it is recommended that No. 311 be so amended
as to permit more than two dogs in accordance with No. 302 (or vice versa).
'n
i jo I i S ML.- i. EDWuk'
612-927-8861
May 31, 1979
Dennis Hanson
Traffic Engineer
Hennepin County
320 Washington Avenue So.
Hopkins, MN 55343
Dear Mr. Hanson:
Enclosed please find certified copy of Resolution passed by the Edina
City Council at its regular meeting of May 21, 1979.
This Resolution was recommended by the Edina Traffic Safety Committee
at its meeting of May 16, 1979.
Very truly yours,
Marcella M. Daehn
Acting City Clerk
enclosure
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council request Hennepin County to
install a traffic semaphore at W. 65th Street and France Avenue which will
have a "Green Arrow" phase to allow U -turns on green arrow only, so that
Northbound - vehicles on France Avenue can reverse their direction and drive
Southbound on France Avenue at W..65th Street; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in the interest of public safety during the recon-
struction of France Avenue, that Hennepin County be requested to install
"No Parking Any Time" signs on the West side of France Avenue from W. 58th
Street to W. 60th Street.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF ACTING CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 21, 1979,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of May, 1979.
Acting City Clerk
'I
Members present:
Members absent:
SECTION A
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
MAY 16, 1979
9:30 A.M.
Fran Hoffman
Lowell Holman
Gene Bartz
Craig Swanson.
Gordon Hughes
Alison Fuhr
None t4l
Requests on which the Committee.recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
LV Resolution to Hennepin County requesting that the traffic semaphore at
West 65th Street and France Avenue have a "Green Arrow" phase which would
allow U -turns on green arrow only for vehicles going northbound on France
Avenue to reverse their direction and go southbound on France Avenue at
Wnc+ Agfk Ctrcot
Request from Bernard Gingold, affiliated with Point of France, to allow
U -turns at West 65th Street and France Avenue after France Avenue is
reconstructed during the summer of 1979.
ACTION TAKEN:
Due to the reconstruction and upgrading of France Avenue this summer, the
crossover (which is located just to the north of West 65th Street) from
northbound France Avenue to the east entrance of the Point of France (the
same crossover is used by southbound vehicles on France Avenue to enter the
west entrance of the Southdale Medical Building) will be eliminated. Allow-
ing northbound vehicles at West 65th Street and France Avenue to make U -turns
on a "Green Arrow Only" will provide an easier access to the Point of France.
Capt. Holman moved that the Committee recommend allowing U -turns on a "Green
Arrow Only" at West 65th Street and France Avenue and that a resolution be
sent to Hennepin County requesting the installation of the necessary equip-
ment and signing. Motion seconded by Gordon Hughes. Motion carried 6 -0.
CC2) Resolution to Hennepin County Requesting the installation of "No Parkin
Anytime" signs on the west side of France Avenue from West 58th Street
St bUtn Street.
City of Edina and Hennepin County officials have requested the installation
of "No Parking Anytime" signs on the west side of France Avenue.from West
58th Street to West 60th Street in the interest of public safety during the
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 2
May 16, 1979
reconstruction of France Avenue this summer. Signs would be removed when
the reconstruction project is complete.
ACTION TAKEN:
The installation of "No Parking Anytime ".signs on the west side of France
Avenue from West 58th Street to West 60th Street would allow for an unre-
stricted flow of traffic on southbound France Avenue in this area during
the reconstruction of France Avenue this summer. It is anticipated that
many vehicles will be making left turns from southbound France Avenue to
eastbound West 60th Street to avoid the construction at the France Avenue
bridge over the Crosstown Highway. This movement is also the designated
detour route. The parking.restriction will assure that the right lane of
southbound France Avenue at West 60th Street will be open to allow cars
going straight ahead to pass those making left turns at West 60th Street
and France Avenue.
Chief Swanson moved that the Committee recommend the installation of the
"No Parking Anytime" signs in the requested area and that a resolution
be sent to Hennepin County requesting the "No Parking Anytime" signs be
installed during the duration of the France Avenue reconstruction project.
Motion seconded by Gordon Hughes. Motion carried 6 -0.
3. Install "No Parking This Side" signs on the east side of Glengarry Parka
from Ayrshire Boulevard to the north lot line of 5208 Glengarry Parkway.
Bob Kojetin, Edina Park and Recreation Department, requests the installation
of these signs to prevent vehicles from driving on the grass boulevard.
(There are no curbs on the east side of Glengarry Parkway in this area and
vehicles tend to park on the grass boulevard when people are using Highlands
Park.)
ACTION TAKEN:
Chief Swanson moved that the Committee recommend installation of the signs
as requested. Motion seconded by Alison Fuhr. Motion carried 6 -0.
4. Install ".No Parking on Sundays, 7 A.M. to 1 P.M." on the north side of
Olinger Boulevard from Tracy Avenue to the west lot line of 5900 Olinger
Boulevard.
Request from area residents on Olinger Boulevard to install "No Parking
on Sundays, 7 A.M. to 1 P.M." signs on both sides of Olinger Boulevard
from Tracy. Avenue to Olinger Road. This parking restriction would relieve
problems created by the overflow of vehicles which can't be parked in the
Colonial Church lot during Sunday church services because of the lack of
parking area available.
ACTION TAKEN:
Members of the Traffic Safety Committee reviewed this request prior to its
meeting date of May 16, 1979 and agreed to limit the parking restriction
request only to the north side of Olinger Boulevard and from Tracy Avenue.
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 3
May 16, 1979
to the west lot line of 5900 Olinger Boulevard. Area residents are sat-
isfied with the modified request.
Alison Fuhr moved that the Committee recommend approval of the modified
request with the condition that the area around the Colonial Church be
reviewed after six months (Colonial Way and a second parking lot should
be completed) to determine the need for continued parking.restrictions
on Olinger Boulevard. Motion seconded by Chief Swanson. Motion carried.,
6 -0.
5. Close the current entrance from Valley View Road into the municipal swim
min g pool. Reconstruct the current exit from the municipal swimming pool
onto Valley View Road into an exit- entrance. Vacate the crossover located
between the east and westbound lanes of Valley View Road at the current
entrance to the municipal swimming pool located just to the south of West
65th Street Re- design the parking lot of the municipal swimming pool to
allow for a safer flow of vehicle and pedestrian traffic.
Request from City staff to reconstruct the municipal swimming pool parking
lot and its entrance and exit from Valley View Road to allow for a safer
movement of vehicles and pedestrians.
ACTION TAKEN:
The Traffic Safety Committee heard preliminary plans to reconstruct.the
municipal swimming pool parking lot and its entrance and exit from Valley
View Road. Because of the potentially hazardous situation which exists
at the entrance to the pool off Valley View Road (speed of cars coming
off the Crosstown Highway - Valley View exit, no right turn lane for vehicles
which enter into the swimming pool lot off Valley View; bike riders and
pedestrians are currently entering pool parking lot at a location too close
to the Crosstown exit ramp) the Traffic Safety Committee agrees with the
proposed changes. The Traffic Safety Committee also felt that the work to
correct these problem areas should begin as soon as possible, as Valley
View Road in front of the municipal swimming pool will be carrying more
traffic this summer due to the France Avenue ramp closures on the Crosstown
Highway. Valley View Road is the designated detour route during the con-
struction period.
Gordon Hughes moved that the Committee recommend the approval of the pro -
posal plans to reconstruct the municipal swimming pool parking lot and its
entrance and exit. Motion seconded by Craig Swanson. Motion carried 6 -0.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
1. Mr. Osberg is requesting that the City of Edina install "No Skateboarding"
signs in the municipal parking ramps.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Osberg advised Capt. Holman that on occasions he and his wife have
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 4
May 16, 1979
observed children skateboarding in the municipal parking ramps and felt
the City should prohibit such activity by signing the ramps with "No
Skateboarding" signs. The Traffic Safety Committee agreed that the City
can't sign every section of the City because of somebody's improper activ-
ity. Also, there is no specific ordinance prohibiting "skateboarding" in
the municipal ramps: Capt. Holman advised the Committee that the police
department patrols the ramps on a regular basis and asks children not to
skateboard in the ramps for their own safety. The police department also
responds to calls from citizens who are concerned with children skate -
boarding in the ramps and asks the children to skateboard someplace else..
Gordon Hughes moved that the Committee recommend denial of the request.
Motion seconded by Capt. Holman. Motion carried 6 -0.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or are referred to others.
Chief Swanson moved the meeting be adjourned. Seconded by Gordon. Hughes.
Motion carried 6 -0.
Respectfully submitted,
Lowell Holman, Secretary
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
Cc '_Fio�c�cc ii��1be�
1M.'EDINA
nil T 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
612 -927 73861
June 8, 1979
Mr. Garry Koch
Saints Valley View Roller Skate Center
7225 Washington Avenue
Edina, MN 55435
Dear Mr. Koch:
Re: Public Dance Permit Application
This letter is written to advise you of Council action at its meeting
of May 21, 1979, regarding your application for Public Dance Permit.
The Council voted to accept staff's recommendation to issue temporary
permits for each dance with the understanding management must comply
with the State Statutes requirements. Therefore, you would be required
to apply for a temporary permit for each dance. This would be on a
trial basis with the possibility of granting a year's permit if all
conditions were met.
We are returning your check No. 1255 dated 3 -14 -79 in the amount of
$5.00 which you had submitted with your renewal permit application.
Also enclosed is your food establishment license for the snack bar.
If you have any questions please contact Chief Swanson or me.
Sincerely yours,
2 rR6osland Kenneth E. City Manager
KR:md
enclosures
cc: Chief Craig Swanson
PPPPP' CITY OF EDINA It
PP 4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
Sir -7 J
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE
C�ul� �e{Ztr�td G�� -�%
Name of Establishment Saints-.Valley View Roller Skate Center
Address 7225 Washin'gton Ave. ,` S. , Edina, Mn. Phone No. 944 -1-173
(Zip Code)
Type of License Desired Dance License
Description of Operation Roller Skating Center
Name of Manager
rst
uarry (Middle) UJ,(,�,a.dyt
arson directly responsible for operat
Address of ManageJ0036 Pleasant Ave., S. Bloomington Mn
Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year)
10- 12 -Wp Code)
P-, A!�! c So /V
References: (1) Name
st) Koch
Phone No.884 -8323
Address —Phone No. $ 9 4 - �^ �- f
(2) Name K- a--- Q-�-�-
Address ? a- 0 3 - g `� C� .. o S-. _ Phone No. G B
Owners (If corporation, list principal officers):
Name (1) Peter D. Boo Birthdate 1 - - 32
First Middle Last (Month, day, year)
Address 826 S. Syndicate , St. Paul, Mn. 55116 Phone No. 698 4788
References: (1) Name Joseph T. 0' Neil l
800 N. W. National Bank Bldg.
Address St. Paul , Hn. 55101 Phone No. 227 -9505
(2) Name Thomas Schreier
Griggs Midway Bldg.
Address St Paul, Mn Phone No.645 3671
Name (2)
First
Address
References: (1) Name
Address
(2) Name
Address.
Birthdate
Middle Last (Month, day, year)
Phone No.
Phone No.
Phone No.
pppp-
Application for License
Page 2
Name (3) Birthdate
(Month, day, year)
Address Phone No.
References: (1) Name
Address Phone No.
(2). Name
Address
Phone No.
Has the applicant, or if the applicant be a partnership, the partners, or if the
applicant be a corporation, the principal officers and managers, and the named manager
ever been convicted of a criminal offense other than a traffic offense? No
If so, state the information as'to the time,. place and nature of such offense:
I, being duly sworn on oath, depose and say that the statements herein are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief. I have read and understand all laws and ordinances
pertaining to, the operation of the above listed establishment in the City of Edina.
It is agreed to notify the City Clerk in writing within 48 hours of any changes in the
above listed personnel.
Date
License Fee Enclosed $
Signed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public in and for the State
of Minnevta, County q f Hennepin,
this �Z y day of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(FOR 0FFICI�'1L USE ONLY)
Approved
Police Department
Approved
Health Department
Approved
City Council
License No.
Date
Date
Date
(78)
9�14
Emergency Plan (Appendix 5)
City of Edina, Minnesota
4. Local government requirements are to implement emergency
procedures as prescribed in the local Emergency Plan.
V. OPERATING PROCEDURES
Page 3
Upon receipt of warning, the Warning Officer will take the following
actions:
A. Warnings received from the Hennepin County Warning Point.
1. Disseminate warning to the general public by activating the
appropriate signal on the sirens, horns and /or other devices
(see Activation Procedures on Attachment A).
2. Alert government officials and key agencies and take other
actions as provided in local SOP's (see Attachment E).
B. Warnings generated within the municipality.
Y
1. Natural Disasters
a. Sighted touchdown tornado.
_� _ ,
-• f(�
�'
5 `� �
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE
Name of Establishment Saints-.Valley View Roller Skate Center
Address 7225 Washington Ave. S., Edina, Pin. Phone No. 944 -1-173
(Zip Code)
Type of License Desired Dance License
Description of Operation Roller Skating Center
Name of Manager (First) carry (Middle) (,(J,Lk aOytJ (Last
(Person directly responsible for operation)
Koch
Address of ManageJ0036 Pleasant Ave., S. Bloomington Mn Phone No.884 -8323
10 -12- j�ip Code)
Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year `+
References: (1) Name
Address ! j l3 Phone No.
(2) Name
Address '? a- 0 3 Phone No. �lo c/ - 3� 6 O
Owners (If corporation, list principal officers):
Name (1) Peter D. Boo Birthdate 1 - - 32
First Middle Last (Month, day, year)
Address 826 S. Syndicate , St. Paul, Pin. 55116 Phone No. 698 4788
References: (1) Name Joseph T. O'Neill
800 N. 1.1. National Bank Bldg.
Address St. Paul , 11n. 55101 Phone No. 227 -9505
(2) Name Thomas Schreier
Griggs (Midway Bldg. 'Phone No
Address . �[L� 3671
� t pall] � l 1 ,Mn
Name (2) Birthdate
First Middle Last (Month, day, year)
Address Phone No.
References: (1) Name
Address Phone No.
(2) Name
Address Phone No.
• m .i - i,
Application for License
Name (3)
Address
References: (1) Name
Page 2
Birthdate
(Month, day, year)
Phone No.
Address Phone No..
(2) Name
Address
Phone No.
Has the applicant, or if the applicant be a partnership, the partners, or if the.
applicant be a corporation, the principal officers and managers, and the named manager
ever been convicted of a criminal offense other than a traffic offense? No
If so, state the information as to the time, place and nature of such offense:
I, being duly sworn on oath, depose and say that the statements herein are true to the
best of my knowledge and belief. I have read and understand all laws and ordinances
pertaining to the operation of the above listed establishment in the City of Edina.
It is agreed to notify the City Clerk in writing within 48 hours of any changes in the
above listed personnel.
Date
Applicanrl',s/ Sigp(ature
License Fee Enclosed S
s Signature
Signed and sworn to before me, a
Notary Public in and for the State
of Minnesota, County of Hennepin,
this � / day. of
U
------------------------- - - - - -- -(FOR -- ------ USE -------- -----------------------
OFICIU�
Approved
• Police Department
Date
Approved Date _
Health Department
Approved
City Council
License No.
Date
(78)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Dance License
DATE: March 28, 1979
I recommend that the application for a dance license for the Saints Valley
View Roller Skate Center, 7225 Washington Ave. S., Edina, MN, be denied.
This recommendation is based on observations made by the Edina Police Dept.
of the establishment's operation under a license granted during 1978.
Specifically, on July 15, 1978, the establishment was observed conducting
dances without the presence of an officer of the law. This requirement is
not of local origin or concern but is clearly stated in State Statute 624.50.
Additionally, the patrons of this dance appeared to include persons under
the age of 16 years not in the company of their parents. This is addressed
in State Statute 624.49 and is prohibited.
These observations were made and could have resulted in proceedings for
revocation of the license or citing of the establishment for violations of
law. This did not occur. However, if the establishment continues in the
same manner as observed, this may happen based on citizen complaint or
concern.
During the 1978 dance license application process, the establishment sub-
mitted a letter dated June 6, 1978. This letter stated, "These dances
would comply with the State law . " Subsequent observation reveals
that the establishment did not comply.
If a license to conduct a public dance is granted to the Saints Valley View
Roller Skate Center, its owners and managers should be advised of the obser-
vations made and the law pertaining to the operation.
. CD s
CRAIG /G. SWAN SON
CHIEF OF POLICE
11� ) c v
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEWEY HILL ADDITION REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED that that certain Registered Land Survey, generally located
North of W. 78th Street, East of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill
Road and presented for final approval at the Edina City Council Meeting of
April 16, 1979, be and is hereby granted final approval; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all existing special assessments against
Dewey Hill Second Addition be apportioned 2/3 equally among the platted
lots in Dewey Hill Second Addition (being Lots 1 thru 16, inclusive, Block
1, Lots 1 thru 4, inclusive, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 28, inclusive, Block
3), and 1/3 to Outlot B. Dewey Hill Second Addition; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that pending special assessments against Dewey Hill
2nd Addition for Storm Sewer 140B shall be transferred wholly to Outlot B,
Dewey Hill 2nd Addition, upon receipt by the City of a request for such
transfer from all owners and lien holders of Outlot B and containing a
waiver of all claims that such pending assessment, as the result of such
transfer, may be inequitable, unfair, unreasonable, or in an amount greater
than the benefit received.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May',. 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF ACTING CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City.Council at its Regular Meeting of May 21,
1979, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said�-City this 22nd day of May, 1979.
Acting City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEWEY HILL ADDITION REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY
AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED that that certain Registered Land Survey, generally located
North of W. 78th Street, East. of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill
Road and presented for final approval at the Edina City Council Meeting of
April 16, 1979,.be and is hereby granted final approval; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all existing special assessments against
Dewey Hill Second Addition be apportioned 2/3 equally among the platted
lots in Dewey Hill Second Addition (being Lots l thru 16, inclusive, Block
1, Lots 1 thru 4, inclusive, Block 2, and Lots l thru 28, inclusive, Block
3), and 1/3 to Outlot B, Dewey Hill Second Addition; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that pending special assessments against Dewey Hill
2nd Addition for Storm Sewer 140B shall be transferred wholly to Outlot B,
Dewey Hill 2nd Addition, upon receipt by the City of a request for such
transfer from all owners and lien holders of Outlot B and containing a
waiver of all claims that such pending assessment, as the result of such
transfer, may be inequitable, unfair, unreasonable, or in an amount.greater
than the benefit received.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF ACTING CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Ap-ri -l-(4,
-1-6-, 1979, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
2 k _
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this Est day of May, 1979.
Z,Z
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEWEY HILL ADDITION REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY
AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED that that certain Registered Land Survey, generally located
North of W. 78th Street, East. of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill
Road and presented for final approval at the Edina City Council Meeting of
April 16, 1979, be and.is hereby granted final approval; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all existing special assessments against
Dewey Hill Second Addition be apportioned 2/3 equally among the platted
lots in Dewey Hill Second Addition (being Lots 1 thru 16, inclusive, Block
1, Lots 1 thru 4, inclusive, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 28, inclusive, Block
3), and 1/3 to Outlot B, Dewey Hill Second Addition; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that pending special assessments against Dewey Hill
2nd Addition for Storm -Sewer 140B shall be transferred wholly to Outlot B,
Dewey Hill 2nd Addition, upon receipt by the City of a request for such
transfer from all owners and lien holders of Outlot B and containing a
waiver of all claims that such pending assessment, as the result of such
transfer, may be inequitable, unfair, unreasonable, or in an amount greater
than the benefit received.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF ACTING CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of }
16—,-l'M, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21st day of May, 1979.
/ I
v�
(N C e✓ f l f t cti fLn�,
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
MHFA HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT FUNDS
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, State of Minnesota, has been
authorized to undertake a program to provide grants of funds to property
owners for the purpose of housing rehabilitation; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed an application as an Administering
Entity for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement Grant
Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has demonstrated the ability to perform the
required activities of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement
Grant Program;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina is hereby authorized
to make application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for a grant of
funds pursuant to the Home Improvement Grant Program;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of Edina is hereby authorized as an
entity to be charged with the administration of funds made available through
the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement Grant Program, in the
City of Edina.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF ACTING CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 21, 1979, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 29th day of May, 1979.
Acting City Clerk
C4
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
MHFA HOUSING, REHABILITATION GRANT FUNDS
Whereas, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, State of Minnesota, has been
authorized to undertake a program to provide grants of funds to property
owners for the purpose of housing rehabilitation; and
Whereas, the city of Edina has developed an application
as an Administering Entity for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home
Improvement Grant Program; and
Whereas, the city of Edina has demonstrated the ability
to perform the required activities of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Program;
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the city of Edina
is hereby authorized to make application to the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency for a grant of funds pursuant to the Home Improvement Grant Program;
Be it further resolved, that the city of Edina is hereby
authorized as an entity to be charged with the administration of funds made
available through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement
Grant Program, in the muiKy /city of
Edina
Approved
By
authorized officer
Its
title
1979
Y- E.
1RL`unnA %TT I
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: MHFA Home Improvement Grants
DATE: May 14, 1979
We will apply shortly for another funding cycle of the subject funds.
You will recall that these funds are distributed as grants (not loans
as in the CD program) to low income homeowners.
In past years, staff compiled a list and a recommended ranking of all
applicants for this grant program. The City Council thereupon approved
en masse the grants to successful applicants.
In past years, we received enough applicants for these funds in a very
short period of time to make this blanket approval by the Council possible.
Although we expect to distribute 100% of the funds during the course of
the year, we doubt that we will receive enough applications at the onset
.of the program to use all the funds. Thus, if we were to follow past
procedures, an early applicant may have to wait several months to
receive approval from the Council.
We suggest that this year's MHFA program be administered on a first -come,
first - served basis. We advise that a staff committee comprised of you or
your representative, Craig Larsen, and me evaluate applications as they
are received and approve or disprove the grant. This procedure will speed
-up the process for-the homeowner.
-- Gordon L.- Hughes
GLH:jkt
APPLICATION for
GRANT FUNDING
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Program
Year IV
0
I. Administering Entity Information
CLEARLY DESCRIBE THE SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHICAL AREA WHICH YOU WILL
SERVE IN THE GRANT PROGRAM (example: "all of Mower County
except the City of Austin ") All of City of Edina
II. Funding Request
Each Regional Development Commission has recommended funding levels
for areas within its jurisdiction. Consult the attached list to
locate your maximum funding level.
The funding levels listed are for a 12 -month period, however, in
most cases, contracts for a similar level of funding will be
renewable for the following year.
INDICATE THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING REQUESTED: $ 34,848
III. Administrative Costs
(a) Funds for the administration of the grant program must come
primarily from local sources. However, a small percentage of
the total grant funding requested may be allocated to help
cover such costs if other sources are not sufficiently
available. The maximum administrative allowance for cities is
5%; for county and multi-county administrators; 7 %. An
amount not to exceed this listed maximum may be included as part
of your total administrative budget.
(b
INDICATE THE PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTED FOR ADMINIS-
TRATIVE COSTS 5 q (5q, 7% or other)
INDICATE THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING WHICH WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM YOUR
FUNDING- REQUEST- FOR - ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS: $-1,742
INDICATE THE TOTAL ANTICIPATED COST OF ADMINISTERING THE GRANT
PROGRAM IN YOUR SERVICE AREA: $ 3,300
TOTAL GRANT FUNDING REQUEST: $ 34.848
TOTAL ANTICIPATED COST OF ADMINISTRATION: $3,300
PERCENT OF TOTAL FUNDING TO BE USED FOR ADMINISTRATION: 5 %
(NOTE: If this figure is less than 10/10 of the total grant
funding amount, please attach an explanation of the variance.)
INDICATE THE SOURCES AVAILABLE FOR FUNDING ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
AND THE CORRESPONDING AMOUNTS:
MHFA (from IIIa above)
COUNTY FUNDS
CITY FUNDS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUNDS
VOLUNTEER (explain)
OTHER (explain)
TOTAL
IV. Staff Capabilities
(a)
1,742
1,558
3,300
INDICATE YOUR PREVIOUS DIRECT EXPERIENCE IN AND INVOLVEMENT
WITH HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAMS:
(1) x PHASE I MHFA GRANT PROGRAM
(2) CSA WEATHERIZATION PROGRAM
(3) x COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAMS
(4) FARMER'S HOME ADMINISTRATION (FmHA) SECTION 504
(home repair)
(5) HUD SECTION 115 and 312
(6) x HUD SECTION 8 - EXISTING
(7) BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS REHABILITATION PROGRAM
(8) X _ MHFA HOME IMPROVEMENT LOAN PROGRAM
(9) NO PRIOR EXPERIENCE
(10) OTHER (explain)
For each of the items checked above, please indicate: (A) The
length of time your agency has been involved with the program;
(B) The total amount of funding channeled through your agency
in the program; and (C) The nature of your agency's involvement
in the program (e.g., "total responsibility ", "intake only ", etc.)
See Attached Sheet
6
Previous Experience with Housing Rehabilitation Programs:
1. Phases I and II MHFA Home Improvement Grants Program
A. Length of time of involvement: June 1976 - present
B. Total funding:
Phase
I -
$28,512
Phase
II -
$34,848
Phase
III -
.$34,848
C. Nature of involvement: Total responsibility
3. Community Development Rehabilitation Programs
A. Length of time of involvement: June 1976 - present
B. Total funding: $126,397, plus anticipated $30,000 in C.D. Year V
C. Nature of involvement: Total responsibility for disbursement of
C.D. funds. Grants (Deferred Loans)-are used in conjunction with
MHFA Home Improvement Loans administered cooperatively with a
.local bank.
6. HUD Section 8 - Existing
A. Length of time of involvement: July 1976 - present
B. Total funding: Funding exists for 47 units.in Edina; however, no
funds are channeled through this office.
C. Local staff acts as a field office for the Metro HRA program with
duties of application processing, tenant briefings, and contract
processing.
8. MHFA Home Improvement Loan Program
A. Length of time of involvement: June 1976 - present
B. Approximately $400,000 in Home Improvement Loans to Edina residents
from MHFA. However, this money does not channel directly through
the city.
C. City involvement is .through cooperative agreement with First Edina
National Bank.
I
I
(b)
(c)
(d -)-
STAFF (by position)
Housing Assistance Planner
City Planner
DUTIES HOURS /WEEK PER
NUMBER OF WEEKS
e.q. 16 hrs/
wk for 20 wks)
applications,
inspections,
counseling, public
information,
publicity
Secretary telephone,.typing
information
Total Person Hours
(For MHFA Use Only)
Person Hours Per Grant Dollars
14 hrs /wk for
24 wks.
3 hrs /wk for
1 wk
3 hrs /wk for
24 wks.
411 hours
INDICATE HOLD INSPECTION SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE FOLLOWING
AREAS:
PLUMBING
City
HEATING
City
ELECTRICAL
State
STRUCTURAL
City
ENERGY RELATED
City
OTHER (specify)
INDICATE THE INSPECTION EXPERIENCE AND TRAINING, BACKGROUND OF EACH
INSPECTOR (i*.e., 20 years experience as a licensed plumber,
certified by •I.C.B.O., etc.)
.Experience of City Inspectors:
Plumbing - licensed plumber since 1941,-certified by State Buildin
officials, chief building inspector for City of Edina
Heating - heating contractor 1953 - 1977, city inspector 1977
Building - (structural and energy) - building contractor 1948 -1968
city building inspector 1968-
Provide attachment if necessary.
3
V. Applicant Selection
(a
An Administering Entity shall establish priorities for the awarding
of qrant funds if a "first- come,-first- served" system is not used.
In the event that the number of applications exceeds the number
of Grants which can be feasibly awarded, this schedule of
priorities shall be used as the basis for ranking such applications.
Use of such selection criteria constitutes a "targeting" of funds
and must be included in the Application for Grant Funding as
approved by City Council or County Board. MHFA Grant Funds may be
targeted for particular geographic-areas, types of improvements,
population groups, or to meet specific planning goals or other.
relevant objectives. Funds may not be targeted in such a way as
to exclude any particular applicant otherwise eligible under the
Procedural Guides from making an application and being considered
eligible for a Grant. These Selection Strategies may take the form
of a point system, a priority list or a combination of the two.
IF A PRIORITY SYSTEM IS TO BE USED, CHECK HERE X
A COPY OF THE PRIORITY RATING SYSTEM MUST BE ATTACHED.
IF A FIRST -COME, FIRST - SERVED SYSTEM IS TO BE USED, CHECK HERE
(b) INDICATE WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO USE A GRANT REVIEW
COMMITTEE FOR SELECTING APPLICANTS
X YES NO SEE ATTACHED EXPLANATION
IF NO, HOW WILL APPLICANTS BE SELECTED?
VI. Outreach Methods
(a)
groups; publication in local newspaper (Edina Sun); public
service announcements will be sent to area newspapers, television,
and radio stations. Flyers will be distributed door to door
in selected areas.
4
0
V. (b)
The City of Edina proposes to utilize a staff level grant
review committee for application selection. A committee of three
staff people selected by the City Manager would review all applications
on a scheduled basis until all funds are committed. The attached
priority list of improvements would be used to rank requested
improvements.
14INIZESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY HOME IMPROVEMENT GRANT PROGRAM
CITY OF EDINA
SCHEDULE OF ELIGIBLE IMPROVO-1ENTS RANKED ACCORDING TO PRIORITY
1�. Energy Efficiency Improvements:
A. Insulation
1. Blanket, batt, reflective, loose fill types
2. Storm doors and windows
3. Weatherstripping and other insulation
2. Imp oveaments Correcting Defects or Deficiencies Affecting Health and Safety:
A. Smoke Detectors*
B. _Plwmbing - Installation, Repair or Replacement
1. Bathroom fixtures and connections
2. Domestic water heaters
3. Sewage disposal systems
C. Electric Wiring
D. Heating and Ventilating Systems.
1. Furnaces and boiler systems; pipes, ducts and radiation; and floor furnaces
and wall heaters
.2. Exhaust and ventilating fans
E. Other Structural Repairs and Alterations
1. Items which '_rrprove the accessibility of the property to a handicapped oc-
cupant '
2. Roofing repair or replacement
3. Foundations, walls, etc.
3. Improvements Resulting in Improved Habitability:
A.'-Plumbing Installation, Repair; or Replacement
1. Bathroom fixtures and connections
2. Domestic water heaters, softener and.conr_ections
_B'. Electric Wiring
C. Heating and Ventilating Systems
- -- - D. -- tither- Structural Repairs and Alterations
1. Repair or replacement of roof, gutters, and downspouts
- 2. - -- Foundations, walks,. etc.
3. New doors, windows, chimneys, etc.
4. Porch and window screen
.E. Exterior Finishing
1. Siding and brick, cement, etc. finishing
2. Painting and waterspouting
F. Interior Finishing
.1. Plastering, wallboard composition, ceramic, plastic and metal tile
2. Composition, linoleum, tile and wood. flooring
3. Painting, papering, or other interior work
4. Other Eligible Permanent Improvements
* One detector per unit to he installed unless present before application.
a
(b) FOR COUNTY AND MULTI - COUNTY APPLICANTS ONLY
To encourage the equitable distribution of grant funds throughout
county Jurisdictions, MHFA is requiring each county and multi -
county applicants to explain the strategy which it will use to
ensure that funds are distributed fairly to small geographic
areas and /or local units of government. (Descriptions of
successful working distribution models are available from MHFA
upon request.)
NOTE: This is not to be confused with the applicant selection
system described in V(a). Distribution Strategies should be
viewed as plans for geographical allocation of available funds
within counties.
DESCRIBE THE DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY WHICH WILL BE USED IN YOUR
SERVICE AREA. (include attachments as necessary)
Not applicable
5
VII. *County Board /City Council Resolution
Attached is a Resolution Authorizing Application for MHFA Housing
Rehabilitation Grant Funds. This resolution must be completed by
the appropriate City Council or County Board.
ATTACH A COPY OF THE COMPLETED RESOLUTION TO THIS APPLICATION.
VIII. Submission
This application is approved and submitted by:
Kenneth Rosland
Authorized Representative of
Applying Entity (print)
Signature
City Manager
Title
Da to
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION WILL BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE AS A
CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENT. IN THIS RESPECT IT WILL BE USED
AS A BASIS FOR MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE.
WHILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION MAY BE ATTACHED, NO
ALTERNATIVE APPLICATION FORMS WILL BE ACCEPTED.
Two copies of this application must be submitted directly to:
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Program
333 Sibley Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
All applications must be received no later than June 2, 1979.
0
1
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR
MHFA HOUSING REHABILITATION GRANT FUNDS
Whereas, the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency, State of Minnesota, has been
authorized to undertake a program to provide grants of funds to property
owners for the purpose of housing rehabilitation; and
Whereas, the City of Edina has developed an application
as an Administering Entity for the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home
Improvement Grant Program; and
Whereas, the city of Edina has demonstrated the ability
to perform the required activities of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
Home Improvement Grant Program;
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the City of Edina
is hereby authorized to make application to the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency for a grant of funds pursuant to the Home Improvement Grant Program;
Be it further resolved, that. the City of Edina is hereby
authorized as an entity to be charged with the administration of funds made
available through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Home Improvement
Grant Program, in the /city of
Edina
Approved , 1979
By
authorized officer
.Its
title
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: MAYOR JAMES VANVALKENBURG
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
KEN ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: J..N. DALEN, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
RE: MOTOR VEHICLE 'LICENSES
21 MAY 1979
Sales of motor vehicle licenses plates are declining at city hall. There
are two reasons:
AAA at W. 36th St & SH 100 has a fully equipped license service
center as does the
** Southdale Hennepin County Service Center at York Ave. & 70th St.
Here at city hall, motor vehicle license sales do continue to cover costs.
Very little additional revenue is generated however.
Here are the total sales of Edina's license department for the past few years:
1971 35,279 transactions
72 36,049
73 32,158
74 28,423
75 35,771 (all passenger vehicles were registered twice in 1975)
76 25,877
77 24,665
78 22,786
This represents a significant decline.
Nearby communities generally do not sell license plates at their city halls.
Those that do, either do not have competing facilities close by or are in
-the business due to state mandate. We operate under no such mandate and
could abandon our license service.
NOT IN BUSINESS
IN BUSINESS
Brooklyn Center
Bloomington
Burnsville.
Golden Valley
Eden Prairie
Richfield
Hopkins
Robbinsdale
Minnetonka
St. Louis Park
We now have an opportunity to review the idea of abandoning our license
service. We have incurred some resignations in our clerical staff. Here
,are.the advantages of eliminating out license service:
* More space for essential activities
** Fewer personnel on payroll
*�*
Considerably l.e:�s traffic M 0 R E
Motor Vehicle Licenses 21 May 1979
Here are the disadvantages:
)i
e
* Less convenience provided to residents living near city hall
(AAA and Southdale /Hennepin Service Center are only 2 miles
from nearly every residence in the .city.)
Slightly less revenue for,the city
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the city abandon motor vehicle license operations
effective 30 JUNE 1979. We believe this action will benefit both the
city of Edina and the local licensing system. We feel that our selling
license plates is frankly a duplication of services in this area. Due
to recent resignations we now have an opportunity to abandon this
service with little negative impact on our personnel.
Thank you for your consideration.
I I O vc ft [ -c.�
L
tt,1i ;EST 5011-1 STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55 -124
612- 927 -8861
May 31, 1979
Gary Kollman
Room 107, State DOT Bldg.
St. Paul, MN 55155
-7
vcd-
j I
Dear Mr. Kollman:
Re: Radar Units Purchase
Enclosed please find the following with reference to the above:
1. Certified copy of Resolution adopted by Edina City Council
2. Three executed copies of Contract signed by City of Edina
As I informed you by telephone, an executed copy of the Joint Purchasing
Agreement is already on file with the State of Minnesota.
Please return one copy of the Contract after it has been signed by the
State officials, together with instructions on how to order the radar
units.
Please contact me if you have further questions.
Yours very uly,
Mark E. Bernhardson
Administrative Assistant
MB:md
enclosures
✓sQhd r�ry
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State of
Minnesota, Department of Public Safety for the following, to -wit:
To reimburse the county for monies spent in connection with project grant number
79 -05 -02 for the purchase of moving radar at 50% of the net contract price of the
radar unit but not to exceed $289.50 per -radar unit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City and City Manager be and they
hereby are authorized to execute such agreement.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
City of Edina
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the
resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina at
a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May 1979, as shown by
the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
City Clerk
RR.gnT.TTTT0W
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State
of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety for the following, to -wit:
To reimburse the county for monies spent in connection with project grant
number 79 -05 -02 for the purchase of moving radar at 50% of the net contract
price of the radar unit but not to exceed $289.50 per radar unit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City and City Manager be and
they hereby are authorized to execute such agreement.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
CERTIFICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of
the resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City of
Edina at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the 21st day of May, 1979,
as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
Acting City Clerk
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota, procures for State
Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities and equipment, which
are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate methods, and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has authorized the
State and its Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements to exercise jointly the
governmental powers and functions each has individually, and
WHEREAS, the State and the City of Edina wish to combine their purchasing functions as is
specifically provided below so that the City of Edina may avail itself of the prices which
have been agreed upon by the State and its Vendor.
THEREFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the City of Edina the
commodities listed below, at the prices and terms as are available to the State under
contracts entered into under competitive bidding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by
the Commissioner of Administration:
Four (4) MPH Model K -55 Speed Measure Units (Radar)
IT IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such State Contracts,
it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above commodities as they arise by placing
purchase orders against such State Contracts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with
all conditions., terms, specifications, and prices stated in such Contracts. Orders shall be
issued by the City of Edina in accordance with its regularly authorized purchasing procedure.
The State Contract Number shall be shown on the Purchase Order.
The City of Edina shall make payment directly to the Vendor in accordance with its estab-
lished procedures. Neither the State nor its purchasing agent, personally or officially,
shall assume any responsibility for the accountability of funds expended hereunder by the
City of Edina, or the issuance or non - issuance of any purchase order by the City of Edina.
Each party shall separately be accountable for its own expenditures of public funds made
hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to save and hold each other harmless from any loss
or damage for any reason arising from this agreement.
CITY OF EDINA
By
Title
Date
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By
Title
Da to
• 403 STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT Office Memorandum
TO Police Adminstrator DATE: 4-30-79
FROM Gary Kollman
SUBJECT: Rar?ar Projpct
Please co' ir-1-4. rt -t -!r -! -11 t'1r-- C
. oti, tic- Contract and
the Joint 7ur-has! r:- A—eeien,. r:n9n,-ot until you receive a copy
of f-r-trh alonEr on 'in- to or,i-r -,P e:-.Jip,iient. Enclosed is a sample
Resolution to illust•a'C s require(4 for Vie r�,)-�tract. Tt is not n-cessary
to make two resolutions (one for each form) but rather one re-solut-lon will serve both
purposes. If yon haup any questions, please call me at 612-29f'-5093-
Also please send both forms back to me at: Gary Kollman
Room 107 State DOT Bldg
St Paulf Minnesota 55155
1
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION
DIVISION OF PROCUREMENT
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROCEDURE
To enter into a Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the State of
Minnesota, please use the following procedure:
1. The governing board of the Political Subdivision shall pass
a resolution authorizing the local purchasing official to
enter into'a Cooperative Purchasing Agreement with the State
in accordance with M.S. 471.59 laws of 1969. Send a photo
copy of this resolution to the State Division of Procurement,
Commodity Contract Section, 112 Administration Building, St.
Paul, Minnesota. 55155•
2. Execute three (3) copies of the Cooperative Agreement form
as per sample copy, enclosed, to be signed for the Political
Subdivision by the official authorized by the board (above).
Send the three signed copies to the Division of Procurement
with a copy of the resolution mentioned above.
3. The State will sign and return one executed copy of the
Agreement. The State will furnish a list of the contracts
available. The Political Subdivision may then request copies
of those contracts in which they are interested.
4. If the Agreement is to be only for specific commodities,
please name the commodities under (listing of commodities).
If the Agreement is to be of a general nature for all contracts
available, use the word "Various ".
5. In order to determine the amount of participation in the
Cooperative Purchasing Program, we request the following
information:
Dollar amount spent on Contract.
Dollar amount saved on use of these Contracts.
Possible Administrative dollars saved on use of Contracts.
A PROSPECTUS OF COOPERATIVE PURCHASING IN GOVERNMENT
Harvey W. Leach, Contract Administrator
The Scope of State Cooperative Purchasing Plan
A) Make available to participating Political Subdivisions as many
State Contracts as participating Vendors will allow.
B) With the "assistance" of the participating Subdivisions and
Vendors, seek new area's in goods and services to place under
Contract.
C) To develop with the aid of participants, a simple method of
determining amounts being spent on these Contracts or how they
are being utilized.-
D) To caution the participants against using the Contract prices
"merely" as bargaining tool thus destroying their functional
vaule.
Enabling Legislation
In the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Statutes M.S. 471.59, Laws
of 1969, grants the rights, powers.and duties of the Political
Subdivision.
Some Items of Clarification:.
A) One of the chief aims of this program is to assist local govern-
ments whenever possible.
B) It should be clearly understood this is a voluntary, permissive
program.
C) The State does not become Purchasing Agent for any governmental
units.
D) In essence, the program extends the promise of benefits of
centralized Procurement beyond normal limits.
ADVANTAGES
A) Reduced costs.
B) Improved specifications.
C) Increased price competition.
D) Indirect savings eliminating administrative duplication.
E) Manpower savings in time preparing requisitions for bids, making
evaluations and testing.
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Eo) AJQ' enter
into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety
for the following purpose., to -wit:
To reimburse the county foi'moni:es spent in connection with project grant number
79 -05 -02 for the purchase of moving radar at 50% of the net contract price of
the radar unit but not to exceed $289.50 per -radar unit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City and City Manager be and
they hereby are authorized to execute such agreement.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
City of Z)1 A)
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy
of the resolution presented to and adopted by the City Council of the City
of E b /A/ 9- at a duly authorized meeting thereof
held on the e2 1 6 7` day of m 4'�J_
197_, as shown by the minutes of said meeting i my possession.
City Clerk
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREErLENT
• J
WHEREAS,,the Commissioner of Aamiuisti,a, ion of the--State of Minnesota, procures
for State Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities
and equipment, which are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate
nethods, and
A EREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has
authorized the State and it's Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements.
to exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has individually,
ind
iHEREAS, the State and the *( ) wish to combine
their purchasing functions as i specifically provided below so that the
'( ) may avail itself of the prices which have been
igreed =p6nVtW S=at: and its Vendor.
CHEREFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the
`( u� the commodities listed below, at the prices and terms
as are_f a461a le to the State under contracts enetered into under competitive
3idding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by the Commissioner of Administra=
;ion:
( lni 5- t.ing_ f�dttie•s )�
+Y
Fo�r� I')'1 PN M o.)rL
e
'T IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such
State Contracts, it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above
:ommodities as they arise by placing purchase orders against such State Con -
;racts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with all conditions, terms,
Specifications, and prices stated in such Contracts. Orders shall be issued
)y *( lon) in accordance with-its regularly authorized pur-
:hasing pr Zelu e: " Iffie State Contract Number shall be shown on the Purchase
)rder.
e.1-1 04 EA-�)Ajp}
'he *(Peliie ' c,bd' ° --'-Jon shall make payment directly to the Vendor in
accordance with it's established procedures. Neither the State nor its
)urchasing agent, personally or officially, shall assume any responsibility
'or the accountability of funds expended hereunder by the
iivision), or tie issuance or non - issuance of any purchase order by the
n). Each party shall separately be accountable for its
)wn expenditures of public funds made hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to
Save and hold each other harmless from any loss or damage for any reason arising
'rom this agreement.
37
'itle
STATE OF MINNESOTA
By.
Title
)ate Date
.� - -
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
(STATE
4HEREAS „the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota, procures
` '.or State Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities
ind equipment, which are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate
nethods, and
1HEREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has
authorized the State and it's Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements.
;o exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has individually,
ind
1HEREAS, the State and the *(Name of Political Subdivision) wish to combine
;heir purchasing functions as i specifically provided below so that the
'(Political Subdivisions) may avail itself of the prices which have been
agreed upon by the State and its Vendor.
'HEREFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the
`(Political Subdivision) the commodities listed below, at the prices and terms
is are available to the State under contracts enetered into under competitive
)idding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by the Commissioner of Administra-
:ion:
(listing of commodities)
:T IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such
state Contracts, it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above
:ommodities as they arise by placing purchase orders against such State Con -
;racts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with all conditions, terms,
Specifications, and prices stated in such Contracts. Orders shall be issued
)y *(Political Subdivision) in accordance with its regularly authorized pur-
;hasing procedure. The State Contract Number shall be shown on the Purchase
)rder.
'he *(Political Subdivision) shall make payment directly to the Vendor in
accordance with it's established procedures. Neither the State nor its
) urchasing agent, personally or officially, shall assume any responsibility
.or the accountability of funds expended hereunder by the *(Political Sub -
iivision), or the issuance or non - issuance of any purchase order by the
`(Political Subdivision). Each party shall separately be accountable for its
)wn expenditures of public funds made hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to
Save and hold each other harmless from any loss or damage for any reason arising
'rom this agreement.
,POLITICAL SUBDIVISION) STATE OF MINNESOTA
iy
'itle
)ate
By
Title
Date
(Fill in name of Political Subdivision in these spaces)
COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT
(STATE C
�WHEREAS,,the Commissioner of Administration of the State of Minnesota, procures
for State Agencies through competitive bidding various supplies, commodities
and equipment, which are then ordered by or for the Agencies by appropriate
methods, and
WHEREAS, the State Legislature by Minnesota Statutes 1969, Sec. 471.59 has
authorized the State and it's Political Subdivisions to enter into agreements.
to exercise jointly the governmental powers and functions each has individually,
and
WHEREAS, the State and the *(Name =of Political Subdivision) wish to combine
their purchasing functions as ,i - specifically provided below so that the
*(Political Subdivisions) may avail itself of the prices which have been
agreed upon by the State and its Vendor.
THEREFORE, it is the purpose of this Agreement to make available to the
*(Political Subdivision) the commodities listed below, at the prices and terms
as are available to the State under contracts enetered into under competitive
bidding pursuant to M.S. (1969), Chapter 16, by the Commissioner of Administra,
tion:
(listing of commodities)
IT IS AGREED that if the Political Subdivision chooses to buy from any such
State Contracts, it shall purchase all of its requirements for the above
commodities as they arise by placing purchase orders against such State Con-
tracts, for the commodities stated, in accordance with all conditions, terms,
specifications, and prices stated in such Contracts. Orders shall be issued
by *(Political Subdivision) in accordance with its regularly authorized pur-
chasing procedure. The State Contract Number shall be shown on the Purchase
Order.
The *(Political Subdivision) shall make payment directly to the Vendor in
accordance with it's established procedures. Neither the State nor its
purchasing agent, personally or officially, shall assume any responsibility
for the accountability of funds expended hereunder by the *(Political Sub-
division), or the issuance or non - issuance of any purchase order by the
*(Political Subdivision). Each party shall separately be accountable for its
own expenditures of public funds made hereunder. Both parties hereto agree to
save and hold each other harmless from any loss or damage for any reason arising
from this agreement.
(POLITICAL SUBDIVISION) STATE OF MINNESOTA
By.
By.
Title Title
Date
Date
*(Fill in name of Political Subdivision in these spaces)
Fol THE S-1
MARKET MUSINGS
LETTER
May, 1979
Over the past three months the tax exempt market has remained amazingly stable.
The Bond Buyer Index registered 6.26% on April 26 as compared to 6.30% on
January 26. This seems to have held true for the other markets as well, which is
somewhat surprising in light of the gloomy economic reports of the some period.
Alas, three months do not a year make ... .
WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
We often refer to various indices to explain what is happening in the bond market
and why it is happening. Included on the back of the S -1 Letter are the "Bond Buyer
Index" and the "Placement Ratio ", as examples.
The Bond Buyer. Index is compiled by the Daily Bond Buyer, a trade newspaper
published daily in New York City. The paper was founded in 1891 and has been
publishing its Index for more than 60 years. The most common index used is the 20
Bond Index comprised of 20 different issuers: 10 states, 2 counties, 7 cities and
Puerto Rico. Further, the 20 issuers include a mix of ratings: 4 AGO credits, 7 AG
credits, 4 A -I credits, 3 A credits, I Boa -I credit and I B credit. Each Thursday at
the end of trading (about 3:00 E.S.T.) a sampling is taken of the market value of
these securities for an approximate 20 -year maturity and the composite average
then becomes the Index. An I I Bond Index is also published, reflecting only the I I
highest grade bonds, the Aaa's and Aa's. The record low 20 Bond Index was 1.29%
on February 14, 1946. The record high, as most of us remember, was on October 2,
1975 when it reached 7.67 %.
At the some time each week the Bond Buyer also compiles the placement ratio.
This represents the amount of bonds distributed as a percentage of the total new
issues of over $1,000,000 sold each week. This indicates how well the bonds were
received by investors at the yields offered. If the placement ratio is high it
indicates that the bonds were well received at the prices offered and the yields will
probably be adjusted downward until investor resistance is met. On the other hand,
if the ratio is low (below 80% is regarded as low), the yields will be adjusted upward
to attract buyer interest.
Two other indicators are also widely used in the bond trade. One is the "Blue List ",
a daily compilation of all bonds advertised for sale on the secondary market. These
are old issues being reoffered and a level of about $800 million is considered
normal. The other is the "30 -Day Visible Supply" which compiles the total dollar
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED PUBLIC FINANCE ADVISORS
800 OSBORN BUILDING SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 (612) 222 -4241
volume of new issues to be sold during the next 30 days by both public and private
placement. An average of about $1.5 billion is considered normal. As these two
indicators grow or shrink they reflect the balance of supply and demand and also
help to point the direction of the market.
Other markets such as the corporate bond market, stock market or the Treasury
also have an impact on the tax exempt market. As you can see, no single indicator
can point to the direction of the market, but by reviewing all components we try to
get a feel for it. At best, these components can only give a short term indication
of the trend.
S-1 STATISTICAL SAMPLER FOR APRIL
Bond Buyer
For the Week Ending
Index
April 6
6.25%
April 13
6.33%
April 20
6.30%
April 27
6.26%
Placement Treasury Bills
Ratio 13 -Week 26 -Week
92.1% 9.593% 9.496%
76.0% 9.649% 9.572%
88.2% 9.613% 9.627%
85.0% 9.115% 9.295%
SELECTED APRIL SALES
Municipal Certificate of Deposit Rates
Random Sampling for March
MN _ WI
30 -day - 9.650% 9.625%
60 -day - 9.800% 9.875%
90 -day - 10.050% 10.000%
180 -day - 10.350% 10.250%
($100,000 minimum investment)
Bond Buyer Index - Ten Year Summary
Year
Range
Year
Range
1970
7.12% - 5.33%
1975
7.67% - 6.27%
1971
6.23% - 4.97%
1976
7.13% - 5.83%
1972
5.54% - 4.96%
1977
5.93% - 5.45%
1973
5.59% - 4.99%
1978
6.67% - 5.58%
1974
7.15% - 5.16%
1.979
6.58% - 6.22%
Placement Treasury Bills
Ratio 13 -Week 26 -Week
92.1% 9.593% 9.496%
76.0% 9.649% 9.572%
88.2% 9.613% 9.627%
85.0% 9.115% 9.295%
SELECTED APRIL SALES
Municipal Certificate of Deposit Rates
Random Sampling for March
MN _ WI
30 -day - 9.650% 9.625%
60 -day - 9.800% 9.875%
90 -day - 10.050% 10.000%
180 -day - 10.350% 10.250%
($100,000 minimum investment)
I
Sale
Final
Moody's
Municipality
Date
Type
Amount
Maturity
Rating
BBI
Rate
Burnsville, MN
4 -02
Improvement
$ 3,610,000
1995
A
6.28%
5.62%
Kenosha Co., WI
4 -03
County Building
$10,000,000
1998
Aa
6.28%
5.61%
Lac qui Parle Co., MN
4 -03
Limited Oblig. Co.
160,000
1989
NR
6.28%
5.79%
Nashwouk, MN
4 -03
G.O. Sewer Revenue
340,000
1982
A
6.28%
5.64%
Green Bay, WI
4 -04
Corporate Purpose
5 4,000,000
1993
Aa
6.28%
5.44%
Richfield, MN
4 -04
Gross Rev. Rec. Fac.
1,300,000
2000
Ba0-1
6.28%
6.54%
Glenwood, MN
4 -10
Temp. Improvement
190,000
1979
NR
6.25%
6.18%
LaCrosse, WI
4 -10
Corporate Purpose
7,525,000
1993
Aa
6.25%
5.49%
Foribault, MN
4 -16
Improvement
505,000
1995
A -1
6.33%
5.65%
Golden Valley, MN
4 -16
Redevelopment
1, 925, 000
1996
Aa
6.33%
5.65%
White Bear Town, MN
4 -16
Improvement
2,895,000
2001
Boa-1
6.33%
6.04%
Victoria, MN
4 -17
Improvement
250,000
1998
Baa -1
6.33%
6.10%
Oshkosh, WI
4 -19
Bonds and Notes
2,250,000
1994
Aa
6.33%
5.53%
FinlaysonlSD 570, MN
4 -23
School
1,320,000
2005
Boa
6.30%
6.25%
Lake City, MN
4 =24
Improvement
1,060,000
1997
Boa-,I
6.30%
5.8^0/6
Centerville, MN
4 -30
Improvement
$ 215,000
2000
NR
6.30%
6.25%
Crosby, MN
4 -30
Improvement
$ 115,000
1989
NR
6.30%
5.88%
Crosby, MN
4 -30
Grant Anticipation
$ 470,000
1982
A
6.30%
5.99 %.
I
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEWEY HILL ADDITION REGISTERED
LAND SURVEY
AND APPORTIONING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED that that certain Registered Land Survey, generally located
North of W. 78th Street, East. of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill
Road and presented for final approval at the Edina City Council Meeting of
April 16, 1979, be and is hereby granted final approval; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all existing special assessments against
Dewey Hill Second Addition be apportioned 2/3 equally among the platted
lots in Dewey Hill Second Addition (being Lots 1 thru 16, inclusive, Block
1, Lots 1 thru 4, inclusive, Block 2, and Lots 1 thru 28, inclusive, Block
3), and 1/3 to Outlot B, Dewey Hill Second Addition; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER, that pending special assessments against Dewey Hill
2nd Addition for Storm Sewer 140B shall be transferred wholly to Outlot B,
Dewey Hill 2nd Addition, upon receipt by the City of a request for such -
transfer from all owners and lien holders of Outlot B and containing a
waiver of all claims that such pending assessment, as the result of such
transfer, may be inequitable, unfair, unreasonable, or in an amount greater
than the benefit received.
ADOPTED this 21st day of May, 1979.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF ACTING. CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of.
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April
16, 1979, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21st day of. May, 1979.