The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1978-02-06_COUNCIL MEETING(Revised) AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 6, 1978 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of December 19, 1977, January 9 and 16, 1978, approved as submitted or cor- rected by motion of , seconded by RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS - BRIAN MEEKER RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - EDINA QUILT RESOLUTION OF RECOGNITION - EDINA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS I. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divi- sions, Plats, Flood Plain Permits and Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition - Generally located South of Interlachen Blvd., North.of ?arkwood Road, West of Schaefer Road and East of Lincoln Drive - S -78 -1 (PC- 1/4/78). 1. Preliminary Plat Approval B. Southwest Edina Plan Amendment.- For property located West of County Road 18 and North and South of Valley View Road - Continued from January 16, 1978 C. Banco Properties, Inc. - Generally located at Washington Ave. and Valley View Road (CC- 12/19/77) 1. Final Plat Approval - S -77 -28 2. Ordinance No. 811 -A112 - Rezoning from PID Planned Industrial District to 0 -1 Office District - Z -77 -20 D. Dewey Hill Addition - Located North of W. 78th Street, West of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill Road - S -77 -27 (CC- 12/19/77) 1. Final Plat Approval E. Set Hearing Dates 1. Roger Findell - R -1 and R -3 to PRD -3 - Generally located West of Cahill Road, North and South of Amundson Ave. extended - Final Plat Approval - Z -77 -8 (2/1/78) 2. Colonial Church of Edina - Generally located South of Olinger Blvd., North of Crosstown Highway, West of Tracy Ave. - Plan Amendment 3. Killarney Shores 2nd Addition_ - Generally located North of the Cross- town Highway and West of Gleason Road - Preliminary Plat Approval S -78 -3 (2/1/78) 4. Retail Sales in Planned Industrial District - Ordinance Amendment II. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET NAME CHANGE Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Pre- sentation by City Manager. Spectators heard. Action of Council by Ordinance. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading should be waived. A. First Reading 1. Eden Prairie Road to "Whitehall Way" III. INFORMAL HEARING ON INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS (Continued from 1/16/78) IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Senior Citizens' Advisory Council (Continue to February 27, 1978) Agenda - February 6, 1978 Page Two V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Appointment of Weed Inspector B. Minnesota Department of Transportation - Public Hearing - I- 494 /County Road 18 Intersection - 2/21/78 - City of Bloomington C. Metropolitan Council Meeting - February 15, 1978 - Minneapolis Radisson D. League of Minnesota Cities /Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - Legislative Conference - March 1, 1978 E. Planning Assistance Grant Contract F. Southeast Edina Tax Increment Pledge Agreement G. City /H.R.A. Loan Agreement H. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date - Morningside Improvements I. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council J. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. Suits a. J. L. Builders, Inc. b. Everett G. Fritzberg c. Paul A. Ramberg VI. AWARD OF BIDS A. Administrative Vehicle B. 4 Wheel Drive Articulated Loader C. Air Conditioning Preventive Maintenance Service VII. ORDINANCES First Rea rollcall vote to pass A. Second Reading 1. Ordinance No. 2. Ordinance No. B. First Reading 1. Ordinance No. VIII. FINANCE ding requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. 124 -A4 - Council Salaries for 1978 106 -A1 - Human Relations Commission 101 -A2 - Procedure in Adopting Ordinances A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for pay- ment of the following claims as per Pre -List: General Fund, $74,433.50; Park Fund, $5,289.30; Art Center, $4,812.21; Swimming Pool, $28.98; Golf Course, $1,018.22; Arena, $6,995.90; Gun Range, $451.63; Water Works, $14,483.85; Sewer Fund, $2,995.09; Liquor Fund, $3,476.27; Construction, $924.78; Total, $114,909.73; and for confirmation of payment of the follow- ing claims: General Fund, $45,154.65; Park Fund, $65.64; Art Center, $25.83; Golf Course, $35.96; Arena, $269.98; Gun Range, $15.01, Water Works, $1,547.20; Sewer Fund, $3.60; Liquor Fund, $265,362.80; Construction $3.22; Total, $312,513.89 RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL FOR NORTHWESTERN BANK ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as "Northwestern Bank Addition ", platted by Banco Properties, Inc., and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of February 6, 1978, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1978. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 6, 1978, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 14th day of February, 1978. City Clerk PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 4 REZONING NORTHWESTERN NATIONAL BANK OF HOPKINS SECOND BANK FACILITY BY BANCO PROPERTIES, INC. i . .1 -- WMrNln' bran RVE J'Ot/T/l 6•wn,v I.N, .ut<n< SITE yr6 /'/ .#N /VG1.'711Li/E.1TP'nN /JiPT /oNRL GRNX Why Edina? Why Now? Most people bank where it is most CONVENIENT No banks within 3 miles of proposed site Law Changes Unable to extend banking services until 8 -1 -77 Application No objections Public enthusiasm To provide needed convenience and services 4 drive in lanes 24 hour banking center Extended hours Competent staff Resources to be drawn from Advisory council $80 million resources Staff of 80 Comptroller of the Currency Administrator of National Banks Ninth National Bank Region 800 Marquette Avenue . Suite 1100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 612-725 -2684 November 159 1977 Mr. Douglas J. Meyer Vice President and Cashier Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. Meyer: The Comptroller of .the Currency has approved the Bank's application for permission to establish a branch to be located at the intersection of Valley View Road and County Road 18, Edina, Minnesota. This approval is granted with the understanding that the branch will be opened within eighteen months from this date. This approval shall automatically terminate at thatitime unless prior thereto the expiration date has been extended by this Office. .Please advise this Office at-least two weeks in advance of the definite date on which the branch.will.be opened and furnish-us with its exact address, including street number, and the popular name by which it will be known. The-Comptroller's certificate authorizing.its establishment will-be issued when that information has been received. In no event should the branch be opened for business until you are informed that the necessary certificate of authority has been issued by the Comptroller. Very truly yours, Warren L. Wegener. Regional Director for Corporate Activities ML qr RD ,k• p\� \I jV c Ell[ mL _ OAKVAIf 'frr�•1.i F 04KY. E 'G ,. co < 4r i�iiw Z� 1 l • • J r� 4, Rp 15 sr» 1. r•'r- t'e y - t.: to .'' V %ate t Gwu•rr� Pl W T lAa = a •(�. p ,°� o - A RID al'• p s' •a >y. - .r.�.�l' T3x O ^ < w,til ,M ;•� .�sa'• c„ %i 'i; i� y N•. �'d - • m m N %, <E:: h'ATH % : <1 �% i rc ►,QS .,....c ».S � G rR aa: i 4r > T r41 > �� i •`�a " [: -i:1• [aK[ Sr. A[ [j 4 Yy `.✓YG� Ot - 1'�t < i c ��! •.-=a I w w - '� �> < M �/� Y �c"EApp a ,O �ID St iIJJ' lvO E e .wt. '• z x `; 2nD ;ST N.E 2 �-- - 2l . -- - z j t�� ' t T I ~ .. x x z : 0." •1- * 4,i +��' I_t •QJ x m 1ST N£' ='+ »r[ s. acs< a� y�` �`�y� •:4 c"i; • a oRn = ,"e. 1= $ .. z < a REM °C 'ia./saw•►=» -� -+ si .OSw•1 - : a> .eai3 u.Etia C N .. Y , ^S O C.} ► ► : -7;;: = 't:�- -r_ ' }� O �•.'.ta•:_'(e�"r O 01 8 X cT �F - AYE.r C+! O ST` €C.T e� �• S' +� - "Ib' _ •1�T S 5 z zE. ws. er z :.. iT .,'r�� .' _ _ :" 100„ ..rr �ae•`a ..c. I��.On GOODRI. Z i[E PE hW000: •.a:•.ei'•: •e uIS +p�r3FA�" �- _ "• .r G !Z •r • . .nrr a -1' < z E'sf R :1 ¢ an Jm rnS t• 4,• . X 1 'IM �• x \ -'_ -D ..L / O • Y - ° » e•�e ' O w O O K 'C Z 7 �: C : �. . r L• .� t: ' Nl ¢ • r . O7T. w. S-I' •ro•• e x � t] • .� can ygtc�.fit b•O °� � e.t - T > .e.`: - � la' � • r a .r.t.�}' ar. ` .0 _ > RG. 1 l O •L2S �aO•..'.- to +s. t F •5. . « --INY' o (t - - - �,� K•TEl DR. . as +eM•R• re. .i a I G,s11 z . ��OAJC:+.; r o 1 : �+ as p9 Ca�rT.c.•: •. ''�� r r x _ '.. L - .; e.,:_: ► wort rw[[r •o x OC `'� _ [f ., >G e" S•E Teuaroo0 •[are. •• OutAR K e`d 'r ►F.1t•1i". .• +': �" 52 d •'3,.^A°.i ±:�•ii•'' S 4 LV 9 �•A f ^.'• 1: u • .z - y Y CLS 1 ;� '° .qtr wou arr. 4*G :aae`ppO V•a 8, •a ° � - -- - � - .vbo:E�'+x4.■�erSrtiarii�►y.�: -p` \D. . � � ° cron n ,� `• r `^ s •..s. F( :! • v p \c� i , wcn. een p s O�"r's"In o �e w Ot' "R z 7c � • ° r4q 1 pOD �rw x •w : o � :':_ r � AY�, 1 Nr s O•ri »i . O D R� � : �O . 5 . � ,.o.,..° . v m . :c ,rb: ¢ , K N � � . - j O ferry O •C-{ y y �.ca >. ., r9 .• r O(� Iw a ' 'a °`.N.n.eol[�ke eu 2yi• TM T fi -.• ¢• 90,E IC - � I b• _ � $ _ ..a�! .t e d 3< �� 5' "' ""j:. � R�•- - -JJ - .:... edE» R0. a .la hr 1 `.r.. >.>t e•. 2 `, vco ae "s' /�R y cr _ V ROAD B$E r•,r a' — r J — ` mil. �... e Y D (4r•erliar , >' A1 < 'i :. o Ca w •R[M AO 3 �• • 1 ••ile ae. oe• a • '•aa�., - _ � a. 4a�' � c ..a .I r - o1n•re. •Q ••: r as r. rr I 212 `rqa � •• Y to /p T'- ryw I p0� ArRnr •. � �>sa•.r-'t sr.. ' RO• NO. .wr'" [ � Y F. �I'�: 1 < Z OJ .`c�,tLa� � � �♦ c, r�ce`fra[•r 6y^ �8 ,Ytt ._+ G Ir•• 1z � Yrx�'. 1 >" � G`y �� 66� ' �° P'� �.at [::.orc c.• � N a • o �• � _ a ' � 4 �Jrrz,`. < {�� a• : �•i [ [ c• . e. es rur •�� 8 -1;: . • oAd _ r } f - -� _ ;-v .. 90 ¢ : •a. ar _ .•aan.res u< y.}:. S7.'• .. --[ i!r :[ne 4a.4,o +.° O w n•.. u. t Ir [ 9 ='U C) a.c• :•�F'_;?a.:�%z 'J• I "r o Rc ��yZ ' •.' suk.' ` r, Mf y`t '' J [ ''� �' '' "x� • 4 nA»uTO» �: � w.- � r w y ° YIEW1 } BJIYMtT y-.a O "c.r�l (, u• 8:. n al.J Rkr ti. m '�— -o •a(p -�.1 :: ^.'�4. W f t1 r s`t� w H.PE R. .�•n's' o :Proposed _ "= J Site '%lJC3!• V V - L �.. a" o� �aV � M.ayr'[il•n a.a raCGw a a� c T ye. .. a .•, Q6 } 1 i • S •, acor:>r� e; jlcsr y.�. .c • r� as .a,:`• ,.r I y "ha. o• o>. TarY ° c�.ni 5 "a• r4 SE 1 •�er•• r - R SEE -� -- � > 'd ata rttr.� ° - a•vlhA '' 1 1 I Circe z ♦ •• U r .1� CCrp +•. o'� •s Ka .lrF 1 VALL - o - c _- �! LO•-"- - -- 1 - - ---- ----- -)l ;Z - - - -- c •r_ -. ° .' 1 �Iw HILL I R0 Y • *v0. 60 rau : -,:r �• ra�X c O u ' r a � a�.N' •'e •OI tae ii f' 1 w nTn S '• k Mlle - pe•s - - c 'ir 1 rNDU T ` fit- M gT. 'Yx'•�:pi L ONA �• 78TH1 SY. 1 I I 3. ROWLAND 491 '4 MA R0.• 5 • r ` ' I%• 5 I �' � 6 1 CJ °• �� W •l•� 0. v F � » Iew 1 � }h'••bol: � e[t• /r ttr.ne a :eD ST 3 - - � - h v •'� l C t.J• '� - ►rGr. •000 W _ -_ �1'.• -- -1 -_ WjA6- � .LVD rfSON r• _ '`� • : f[' : -t? ' -: w Oyr e z l _ > to isO RD�+.\I. t1�}T ( �-J r?." rrAt r! :: Fig t-�P�`w {rt. r� i�f K • �! ��aJ .Cr. li..� 7/ •:, tY. _ U� R7SM CTC .. i-; • - li f(t(R (dA• .' ✓T STATEMENT OF CONDITION SEPTEMBER 30 Resources 1977 1976 Cash & Due from Banks $ 7,638,038 $ 4,425,365 U. S. Government Bonds & Agencies 7,299,505 6,016,346 State & Municipal Bonds 9,354,606 8,548,788 Other Bonds & Securities 482,438 261,816 Loans and Discounts 55,515,209 43,832,086 Bank Premises, Furniture & Fixtures 514,542 534,297 Other Assets 606,891 545,140 TOTAL RESOURCES 81,411,229 64,163,838 LIABILITIES Total Deposits 70,242,338 56,397,945 Borrowed Funds 4,375,644 2,250,000 Other Liabilities 820,968 606,386 Capital Notes 1,500,000 900,000 Reserve for Contingency 53,778 97,882 Capital Stock 1,200,000 1,200,000 Surplus 1,200,000 1,200,000 Undivided Profits 2,018,501 1,511,625 TOTAL LIABILITIES & CAPITAL 81,411,229 64,163,838 OFFICERS PRESIDENT William D. Wilkening LENDING DIVISION James W. Morton, Senior Vice President Commercial Loans Clifford S. Jacobson, Vice Pres. & Manager Thomas L. Holtz, Commercial Loan Officer Andrew A. Christensen, Commercial Loan Officer Mildred Navara, Credit Officer Real Estate Loans Daniel O. Johnson, Asst. Vice Pres. & Manager Marion L. Anderson, Asst. Vice President Consumer Banking David C. Harnish, Vice President & Manager Ronald T. Wisti, Installment Loan Officer Delbert R. Smith, Installment Loan Officer Dorothy Fenske, Installment Loan Officer Marketing Robert J. McMillen, Asst. Vice Pres. & Manager ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION Gene A. Haberman, Vice President Planning Douglas J. Meyer, Vice President & Cashier Operations Patricia C. Larson, Operations Officer Personnel Karlene D. Discher, Personnel Officer Finance A. Hugh Thompson, Controller DIRECTORS Alfred A. Colberg General Manager Eaton Corporation Gordon O. Garis Chief Executive Officer RayGo, Inc. Thomas M. Grossman Vice President Grossman Corporation Donald F. Hagen President M.B. Hagen Realty Co. John B. Keefe Attorney Vesely, Otto, Miller, Keefe & LaBore Arthur H. Klobe Vice President Cargill, Inc. William D. Schoell President Schoell & Madson, Inc. A. L. Wegleitner President Matson, Wegleitner & Abendroth Architects, Inc. William D. Wilkening President NORTHWESTERN BANK Of Hopldrrs BANco,BmcoBANcoBacoBmco WStLt 8coB191\ Iof�oB ucc �r c vANcoMyco M ; UBFU t! , "njcc cap �co 1''' "s • . A �•. RIO. r b SOUTHWEST EDINA PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST NUMBER: Public Hearing LOCATION: W. of Co. R. 18 and N. and S of Valley View Road REQUEST: village ylangeng department village of edina . . - o v STAFF REPORT February 1, 1978 Southwest Edina Plan Amendment Refer to: Attached graphics On November 30, 1977, the Planning Commission reviewed and subsequently approved a request for a rezoning from PID (Planned Industrial District) to 0 -1 (Office District) for a parcel of property located at Washington Avenue and Valley View Road. This rezoning was requested to allow the construction of a detached banking facility. On November 30, 1977, the Planning Commission also recommended that the Southwest Edina Plan should be amended to designate an area abutting the County Road 18 /Valley View Road as office uses. The Plan presently identifies this area as Planned Industrial District. According to State Statutes, the Planning Commission must now hold a public hearing on such a plan amendment. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the plan amendment for a variety of reasons. First, offices are presently an allowable use in Planned Industrial zones. However, standards regarding lot area and buildings for offices differ between the Planned Industrial District and the Office District. For comparison purposes, the following ordinance requirements for these districts follow: Office (0 -1) Min. Lot Size None Building Height 4 stories Lot Coverage 30% F.A.R. .5 Street Setbacks Same.as PID in PID areas Min. Building Size None Principal uses Office Financial Inst. Post Office Private Clubs Handball Courts Accessory Uses 40,000 sq. ft. bldgs. permit 10% of floor area for commercial PID 2 acres 3 stories 30% None 50' from street 75' from freeway 10;000 sq. ft. for single tenant 15,000.for. multi- tenant Offices Manufacturing Warehousing Scientific Research Handball Courts Tennis Clubs Roller Rinks None Staff Report Southwest Edina Plan Amendment. Page 2 February 1, 1978. Second,.due to the taking of lands by the County for highway purposes, many of the parcels remaining in the vicinity of Washington. Avenue and Valley View Road are below the two acre minimum lot size required in PID zones. Thus, variances would be required for the construction of buildings on such lots if zoned PID. However, such variances would not be required for, office zones. Third, Valley View Road /County Road 18 interchange is appropriate for office uses. Such office uses have been allowed in other similar locations in the City. In summary, staff believes that the development which would occur if the subject area were zoned Office (0 -1) would be no more intense or adverse as compared to developments.presently allowed in PID zones. This is due to the fact that offices are..an allowable use in PID zones. In addition, the need for variances to waive the 2 acre.minimum lot size reqirement in PID zones may establish an unfavorable precedent for other areas where PID zoning is appropriate. GLH:ks 1/27/78 ••per, . • t i r s .: � .t . . , .�`' f 4 ? ' .� -' ,� ' i�a_a �,ji p: �' � \ T,•' 7' r '''l �,•,. � .. Y14 "�..y�'. i _1.. '•• '!,la',` �r � G BALI _PARK � f. �/'� �� _ � .,•. �•�';, .'.. ,r it v..,. ''�; :` q' �:'�;�•' t '•# p BRAE M .G J • i '1+ • �' 't n 'S E ,, r LF COU F2 S •_ >'p,?i141 't GO 7 t �• /. t •�.'♦•'•' 9� f. l 11�P' ill .I r \' 7 , -+ is ' -T r I ❑ - - \ E N4 • N Its -r/ l'CN —�% ' r � �•. j��o .ii`•- 1`�'•:;Llit ~ . ti( s�. t i,.• •A P,C7, =riT� •$� >- {.I�,� r, ,.f .!I: �, T. .':.i ii' {'rJlj 1 C.C. ,fit'' _ �,,. ?• 11 t�itti'��1 t , {{y�( ��j ' -,;�'! ,� :� �,�,,. �, '•';It!••+ STO" tiM.rP �•''.7 ,tji �.I.tJ f •t 1r, i't: ''S'� i .. �' •1' •� .'i L�'t ^.Ot:GE '�.'�°• i _ � , t ;',::, �'.I Jtf'�f�i 11 I�i�•C. ).. - ::'l; \� ��. , P. x / i �y` •t;.'� ••� (�h;'�`Ir.� iI1� II1111 1'il;_;,• '1 a q ,• •/ .. ,..•'` �i I .' `' r, , G 7'�. 11 4. i 1 i I 1 I 1�. • _ __ + .. i '•`��j �1 ••,- •��;�•� ^�'' ,.,; >' ��.� '; '•,_ ��;:� �`,'•' {F 111, (I {7 ';f� {: :'�, _ �•..7 \' i :. ,r �;n- :'3', ^.7 1.,,..�,� ;,� :� „',, ;,; }•.1�, „ �!�jl�(j�IIrJ.�'�l,,;iy;.:%%=^s '' �3. R • 1 . .. ... ....... ............ . ................,............:. r............ tux �:,:,.•... •�,.•;i'w< r. .. :... .. ., a� '!.':,. /. �:::::: .. _i`- � tA1Ty�'I�VY' ^Tw'.R^_^•” ., \� \ \,`: \ti'•i i\.. \ \...Mww..1.• \.\� \.w•S _ 1 �:7 r kri% %''•�'t _ ��.y may. �' -- � Scale r=600 -� INA UDY' SOUTHWEST E dPLAN � : , '`� _'•'. f. 1 Commercial + �'�• i Res. 0 -A AC cap ',' i ® ! [� Single Family �.� �; ;• Industrial I +� \ ► Planned. 6 y I Mixed Housing Res: ' 6- 6/AC ;. 1 Res 0-12, t �' Por�ding Area , t ' Medium Density t 1 ;--"' Major Stree I Public and Open Space �y'71 rin�tion , Flannii�y Commission G- 2 n` IL w XN lvl^r .f. -T.1,1 \� IROQUOIS Z i IL d 1 LCIRCL.E W 'I 1 1 1 P,SS r-• A V .: < 1 • : ` _ J O 0.4 tC i 3 �t `•� Jim ✓ J'. .!J r .8ALU PAR K COMPLEX,:: zorllin� S CH VIS"I Banco Properties, Inc. - Northwestern Dank Addition S -77 -28 REQUEST NUMBER: Z -77 -20 LOCATION: Washington Ave. & Valley View REQUEST: Rezoning and platting for a detached banking Facility with a drive -in teller U liU �d YLt1w n1mimine dt�ment vlllnl�� Qf inA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 30, 1977 Z -77 -20 and Banco Properties, Inc. Rezoning from PID to 0 -1 S -77 -28 Northwestern Bank Addition • Refer to: Attached graphic and preliminary plat The subject property is a two acre tract of land located between County Road 18 and Washington Avenue, and.north of Valley View Road. This property is presently zoned PID, which is in conformance with the Southwest Edina Plan. Banco Properties, Inc. proposes to construct a detached banking facility for ;northwestern National Bank of Hopkins on this site. A preliminary site plan is attached for this facility. Staff has determined that a detached banking facility is classified as a financial institution which is not an allowable use in PID zones but is allowable in office zones. Therefore, the proponents are requesting a rezoning to 0 -1 Office District. A preliminary plat of the property is also requested. - Recommendation: Staff believes that the proposed rezoning and use of the site is appropriate based upon its proximity to the County Road 18 - Valley View Road Interchange. In other similar locations, such as the T.H. 100 - Industrial Blvd. industrial area, we have allowed office uses in more visible locations in close proximity to major interchanges while locating industrial uses in less visible areas. Due to the Southwest Edina Plan, however, staff is somewhat reluctant to recommend the rezoning of one parcel of property without concurrently amending the Southwest Edina Plan. Therefore, staff recommends a plan amendment to designate an area abutting the County Road 18 - Valley View Road interchange as office uses as shown on the attached graphic. Staff recommends this amendment in that: 1) the improvements to the Valley View - County Road 18 interchange are essentially complete 2) the area is well suited for office uses. 3) the existing parcels of property in this area are below minimum size requirements for PID uses and would require variances to a110W such uses. Such variances would not be required for office uses. Staff recortnends approval of the requested rezoning and subdivision with the following conditions and modifications: Z -77 -20 and S -77 -28 Banco Properties Page 2 November 30, 1977 1) Parkland dedication per the attached report. 2) Rezoning is contingent --n the amendment of the Southwest Edina Plan. 3) Rezoning is contingent on final plat approval. GH:ks 11/23/77 • �f I �• :�' - it , ; y.. . ♦�._,•. -.. . �._. .; �. . , ` „ �' � .. : ) •\� ,'' •l I � -0.i t: U�`. .,..,• ;, `�i j :fir \ K `., � , " i •'~ .. \ � �i :its -. // �, �o'i 'a� I '• '�`�i 11 �:` ` � .v: f� YSC� -3•� / .l I � '- is i bAL -PARK ,' , �(r'• A,`t,' l -s�� \ti *: :Y. )y. E. '.. a.;.r•.j RA MAR• � PARK ., . • � .:' � �.?��;�:,a�:� ;• � _. AND 4 GOLF A COURSES r� ARCft�RT! ! II tt f�i tic' 1 /STJt ? ;I I II 1� l I�I l•lrlf 1: t l �. ! 'y' x x� i �,�'• :j i �A•.5E° /`�}. /, • . ).' '�III� I�I (i I[ 7,, '•.E: � `I. ''i � t �- i�' % :. .�\ i S� ` .. � l.• •' ( •1.• i�`•I'�i�,. 1,II� '� „ .,! 1 1' ..,.1 :1: :S 1 1..' N �� ♦ t �. : {�. •,• •.j ,Ii -•..♦' 1 i .�).,� •r�,`;1 �;'1t. I I1 tl! • I7. '1•' :3: r.1 i, .�Y •' yi' .. �.�.. •, w,J �•! I.�f:•;�'• �'�. '1!1� �I I t ``;iY ,I' .. ... •.j� •�': ', -�"'� ,It• 'n: •'T. ,; ' 1, ,, :.`' ;`'�• I II �tll t �Il�tl� •' �. ..r-" :%± ,�` • ±;: � 1 .1 r'� �� , : , ) • ,11 y::r' ti w +•j.� • .dim I... I , r: Y" ti .. 1 . .:t '1' ;ttt �u r +' , �`. i• /'!l:b.:r +♦Jn% .+e *►.AnaNr`YRM•l1� r I:. IN It 'i .: '� 1 l : i •' i. JL9:lQ.A .1 •:W — -.. Scale: 1=600 ' _ _ SOUTHWEST E15INA PLAN STUDY ; ' - ' Cial Single Family Res. 0 -4/AC Pr; ® ommerc 1' Planned Industrial ,� a• Mixed Housing Res. 0-6�AC •� 1 / •_ �.. Ponding Area Medium Density Res. 0-12 s� •, �. -r Major Street Public and Open Space yr r,^1 Office '- ! . •I w' NA { t / / me •vnt t . Wk N sNrbron AVH dovrN v••'rrl OZAIY • .._,._......r�•.s.. A/ATln wit/ OAlVA" 'r _ • • i � e 1'AVENUE S0. �r•r .M•� r r Iw ►rte. �`�= .- _�•.N� ��.�`w aM ` e .T' W,I SNi�N6TON ... �;" — 2 •. - 'T:.+r �Iiu� ^� •s:iriii a 1Cjra.. • uw bran '� !11^ � .. � - r-- �•- -- • -- _`_ S' ---- __..._� ,,; . X11 � � : j� :: ; ,,• \ I `,I�� ,7 %!-.* . . )- i / / I . . '. I ; t t '# _ �_ —ice`_ / _� / •; t. �r !'_` > 1 / ' 1 1 � • - :l Z .,�••�:��a:�i��v- ''.t % {�_ �...e ..- �` ; .r\ �_�`i�i� \ - w•o / l• r•Lr a «..... •Ira.• i .l`I { r i i i i i �'• KVtiar N0. IB s F Subdivision No. , SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT • TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: LAND SIZE: P51 I'L2, T Zap • LAND VALUE: Z.oea r(t) +n O-1 I� (By Date : Z3 7 ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to 11 A. grant an easement over part of the land EJB. dedicate $ of the land C. donate as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Laiid Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) j"'j1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition U beneficially expands the park. II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications• so.that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. E3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for stcrm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. r75. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. n 6. B. Cash Required DR1. In all other instances than above. . 1"'� 2. ' i I s I to Phone (612) 941.5721 7404 Washington Avenue South 3�. CARLSON STAPLER S Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55343 ��Es� EY SHIPPERS SUPPLY INC. aeea N4MILTON ROP.O. EOEN PRAIRIE, MN eeau PHONE 641 -6230 January 12, 1978 tPORATE January 12, 1978 Mr. Bob McMillen :ICE Northwestern Bank �s_+. 1011 1st Street South Y':9 !E2LE.t asw] Hopkins, Mn 55343 Bob Mc Millen Asst. Vice Pres. kNCH Northwestern Bank - FICES Hopkins, MN. 55343 " .+w •C .'„ s Bob, C 52:6 ::.:s >] TEES a.®aa we here at Carlson's are looking forward to your setting up Bob, • an office in our area. Not only is it a convenience, but a We at Interco would greatly appreciate the opening of a Northwestern :sr}+1 TELEX aawe great energy saver for all the businesses in this area. I have seen the articles concering your plans and do hope Bank in our area. This would greatly help our banking needs as - u"'• everything works out soon, we have been banking in Bloom— a corporation and it would be a benefit to my employees. , E'a,EEF]]9 @TY ington and are especially happy to hear of your efforts. sw u_+s,l.•I Yours sincerely( i Sincerely, fLCW rEEElt 7-QV w, n..1 s- r Mark Rikesa fie snu Mike Berglund J President Office Manager of Carlsons TElFII 41442s , j r, .+ S•.w C•mcarlanb a.a 6511 c)a -!fY • PRODUCTS COMPANY SUPER DISTRIBUTORS I E`31 a� t:7�li6At��i9J custom framing and tine artwork 6955 IWASHINCTON AVE. SO. 6121645- 5814 6959 Washington Ave. S. /Edina, Minnesota 55435 EDINA. MINNESOTA 55435 I i 612- 941 -6649 (612) 941 -7911 I i 1111178 January 10, 1978 j Bob McMillan lull 1st St. S. Hopkins, Minn. Dear Bob, Just a quick ]rote to tell you how delighted we are that the bank Mr. Bob McMillen - - is building near us. . Assistant vice President Northves tern National Bank of Hopkins In terms of convenience this will be a great help not only to us 1011 - 1st Street South but our employees. Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Now the next thing you have to do is finance a decent restaurant! Dear Bab: I have seen your news releases on the proposed opening of your new Dank on Hashington Avenue South in Edina. Am looking forward to using the facilities. Really convenient.I Sincerely, RANDS PRODUCTS COMPANY i - Ed Sttvcr pr - I nt i I s I �..,,'LeFebure., LeFebure Corporation .::.:..... 7242 washington ove. so.*eden prolde, minnesota 55343 *phone: (612) 944.2462 , 'CEDAR FRAPIDS,�IOWAC52406 r e. o•+n n.,.•E.:r 52406 SE�;�rl SrSIEr,S January 11, 1978 Mr. Bob McMillen Assistant Vice President Northwestern Bank Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Bob: We have noted news releases indicating that you are opening a detached facility in our area. We are glad to hear you are coming and are sure that many of our employees will be taking advantage of your services. Looking forward to your opening. Sincerely, David J. Bennett Vice President DJB /llz ' L. 0. I yAL L01 GU /ST �� Washington Avenue S. COMPANY' INC. P.O. Box 35354 Minneapolis, Minn. 55435 1 Phone: 612 / 9442104 MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVES • AGENTS 8 DISTRIBUTORS January 13, 1978 Bob N.avHllan Assistant Vice President N. W. National Beak 1011 First Street South Hopkirs, IM 55343 Dear Bob: We at L. 0. Hallonquist Co., Inc. are vory pleased to hear about your new facility which will be opening in our area. This is a much needed facility for our area. There is not a banking facility to service the western border of Edina and eastern portion of Eden Prairie. I am sure Lost of the business cormunity, as well as the residents of this area, are as excited about it as we are. We will look forward to your grand opening. Plaase notify us of sane. Sincerely, L. 0. EALLO =,MST CO., INC. E &erch O1 /iq 6800 South Courrty Ro,a 1B • Mopkiro,Minry,00= 6121941-7730 January 5, 1978 Mr. Robert J. McMillen Assistant Vice President /Marketing Northwestern Bank Northwestern Bank Building Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Mr. McMillen: We have noticed your sign on Valley View Road indicating the future site of a drive -in bank. this n of ew oservilceosoecloseetoxoursOffice. delight itsi opening. of Sincerely, A A THOMAS SALES & MARKETING, INC. 4 4209 AVENUE SOUTH, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 TEL. (61 9 January 10, 1978 Mr. Bob McMillen Assistant Vice President, Northwestern Bank 1011 First Street South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 Dear Bob: It has been of ccnsiderable interest to us at Thomas Sales & Marketing to learn of your bank's plan to locate a detached facility at the inter- section of Valley Vies Road and Washington Avenue South. We are a small company, but I am sure that many of us will look fervard to having a banking facility close at hand. I for one should be ccn- sidered as one of your prospects for an early new account opening.. .in view of the fact that I pass the location every day going to and coming from work. I will watch for the first signs of construction. Best of luck and keep us posted on your progress. Very trulynyourn,,/ Blake Middleton Vice President esg LOCATION MAP =i< subdivision Dewey Hill Addn. REQUEST NUMBER: S -77 -27 LOCATION: N. of W 78th; W. of Braemar Pk. & S. of Dewey Hill R . REQUEST: 26 lot single family plat village planning ticn.artmcnt villaRC of rdene PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT November 30, 1977 S -77 -27 Dewey Hill Addition. Schuster Property. Refer to: Attached preliminary plat.and Indian Meadows graphics Three years ago, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved a development proposal known as Indian Meadows for the area referred to as the Schuster property. This site measured 70 acres in size and extended from Dewey Hill Road on the north to W. 78th Street on the south. .A development plan was approved which would .allow 40 single family dwellings on the northerly portion of the property which remained R -1 zoning and 291 multiple dwelling units on the southerly portion of the site which was proposed to be rezoned PRD-2. The northerly and southerly portions of the site were divided by open space lands dedicated for the Southwest Edina storm sewer ponding system. The single family lots on the northerly portion of the site were to be served by two cul -de -sac streets from Dewey Hill Road. Multiple family. residences on the - southerly portion of the site were to be served by a cul -de -sac from.W. 78th Street. Since its approval by the Planning Commission, the subject property has been sold. The present owners are now proposing a single family subdivision of the northerly portion of the site. Access to such lots would be provided by a cul -de -sac from Dewey Hill Road. As compared to the previously approved plan for the northerly portion of the site, the present plan proposes a reduction in the total number of lots from 40 to 26. These lots range in size from 18,000 square feet to 53,000 square feet which is substantially larger than existing lots to the north and east. A 20 foot wide outlot is also proposed westerly of Lot 1 to provide access from Dewey Hill Road to City owned lands. Staff and the proponents have discussed generally the development of the southerly portion of the Schuster property, i.e., that portion of the Indian Meadows concept proposed for multiple dwellings Althcugh, the proponents have not submitted any plans for this area, they have indicated their intent to. propose a lower density development than previously approved. Adequate access and traffic circulation is of primary concern for the southern portion of the site. Planning Commission will recall mat in its approval of Braemar Hills 9th Addition on November 2, 1977, it requested that three lots be identified as an:outlot to facilitate the possible access extension of a roadway to serve the southerly portion of the Schuster property. Although :Delaney Blvd. had not been authorized by the Council, this roadway could serve the Schuster property from the east. West 78th Street provides southerly access. Therefore, due to .1) the provision of adequate access from the east, south and west, 2) the multiple residential character of the S -77 -27 Dewey Hills Addn. Page 2 November 30, 1977 southerly portion of the property and the single family character of the northerly portion of the property as well as other properties, 3) the natural division between the northerly and southerly portions of the property created by public open space lands and the Southwest Edina storm sewer ponds and 4) perceived traffic problems on Dewey Hill Road, Planning Staff believes that the northerly and southerly portions of the site should not be connected with a roadway. Such a connection_ was not proposed as part of the Indian Meadows concept. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision in that: 1) the proposal conforms with the Southwest Eidina Plan. 2) the subdivision proposes a lower density than the previously approved Indian Meadows concept. 3) lot sizes are similar to and exceed existing single family lots in the vicinity of the subject property. 4) adequate access to public open space lands has been pro - vided from Dewey Hill Road. Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications: 1) an executed developer's agreement. 2) submission of an erosion control plan. GH:ks 11/23/77 QA O I _ � ,r - � � esr ' L -DEWEY •� sae•,HoL w z ',_ — -- _' •2ss ` ,•�, • ` �\ � \ \!re // // - - / / / I \;....ten• �/ / iJ III I (1 \ ��` \ •�,. \ � I / ; � \ '.\ — •`I'�I \\\ 1 LI \\ ��yu t7i r�.r � \\ \ \\ \\`` \40 i \:�1 • � r °•� >'._ -F •moo ee0 %� \ 1 I ► \\ 1 „r � \\ / % `�\ \ � ' \\\ r �+ i •soazr7i w -:' 38 \\ \ \ I \1 1 'FJ' /1�./ \ n I tr/a;s ^+v, 3i SF OgO . � tiv I _ •� - Lt j `'� �� _ G7 / % O` `� ii/ � l�r��/ � /// � \ \ ` 1 1 i / 1 L 1 ' I 7 11101 a! h / / / A oi. °•O� I I I _ 4'/ �// j',ife / \ \ 1 1 et / 1 • � • ( $� �• -. � / • � / � � ( / / /- �� `� \ \ \�� -� 111 � � 1 ' .�. \ �� . � • \ � /N / / rJ ' � / / i , I / / 'eo \ \ \ ,� ��. --� 111 I \I 1 9�• 1 1 � 1 �� iC! � � /% / �� .e `� ` •� / / / /� �•` ,/ / -�., \ OI Ir,� `�� \\ \ 1 \�� `�Il I 1 1 / � 1 1 ( \rte - --- _ � /i i 7 I� zee I•�- _` / 1 1 , � 1�- �� ' -: \�\��\ \� 1 ^_ / / =_ .,1 „, 1 I I � 11'11111,��, � 1 1 /� r— - - - -- ��/ •/ 'fe ro nr —1 \ 1 111 1 �r.6:tir� Xz :� �\ \� \�i _�•.�_� 1 \ I ; I a I i1 lil l E r ^fNffT.,� 1 iu ef.� +�i Ile • r 6 ? 0 T OCR 4 / l ®/ Y M !" PRErL //!i! /NARY PZ A T , of OCYv E y ti�L L 0 X00 S1'• ° ADp}. 1Q0 09D ! S y S4. yo,S9 yOrsq, y !p �� l•( / fs C is doa r ?.rf. Z / too � . APOAT oN OlJTLOT A, • P400 Sy ff • . 1 / p ff 2 3 OSgff h s9'ff /� 00 J9• °D° ,BroO S9 0 22x60 Ft 25r60 S, airs a 2 j � ¢ S4' f !' � O 2 S q• 0 J I SCALE' /"200 ' / p ff 2 3 OSgff h s9'ff /� 00 J9• °D° ,BroO S9 0 22x60 Ft 25r60 S, airs a 2 j � ¢ S4' f !' � O 2 S q• 0 Do s q'!� a o sa�� 6rp o 1 D 0 f4f� 9 f D S 4'! � � .S 14 r4 ly 2pT 'S� ffi Q3rF�006 i�� • f�' SOD i4 Poo ,.prtip6 ZB� 00 i� �•0 � }: ' �3rb '00 S9• iZ A 2o, S3r /B/ 600- Jy. ft• DD�� D Q/ • Ff' /B�D0 IT 24� p - 17 S 9' 11; 9 f D S 4'! � p BPD ¢ p /.f 1004 i4 Poo i� ovTLa D0 ice. f.q IV ICI r -,I I kli q1 ol 7F4h - slfm _. - - - - -- cqm =IEtj to i�= q =1 a II - ------------ ----------- Fv�= � Vol INDIAN MEADOWS utility plan 0 50 Too li November 22, 1977 TO: Gordon Hughes, Director of Planning FROM: Robert C. Dunn, City Engineer SUBJECT: Utility and Miscellaneous Engineering Considerations Proposed Dewey Hill Addition A review of preliminary information, submitted raises the following preliminary utility and miscellaneous engineering concerns regarding proposed Dewey Hill Addition that must be resolved before final approval can be recommended: 1. Need development plan for entire.Schuster property to finalize road pattern and traffic flow in.Southwest area. f 2. Watermain must be connected to Buchanan Addition Iine.and extended through cul de sac to Dewey Hill. 3. Watermain in West cul de sac can be lZ" Copper to serve five homes. 4. Park land dedication or fee. 5. West cul de sac grade is extreme and must be re- examined.. 6. Water services on Dewey Hill Road that are not used must be cut off at main and sanitary sewer services plugged at curb line. 7. Homeowner's Association, must, by documentation, assume responsibility for maintenance of barrier built along Dewey Hill .and.islands in street right -of -way. 8. To determine path location in this plat, we should have overall path plan for southwest area. 9. When. location of path in this plat has been determined, who is to build it? 10. Open area at West edge of plat is not.needed by City for ponding. Area below 840 contour is.subject to flooding however,and must be maintained as open space /nature area. 11 Dewey Hill Road will, in the future, be improved with.concrete curb and gutter, bituminous paving and sidewalk to M:S.A. Standard Section. If road pattern in area can be finalized per Item #1, this project should be undertaken in 1978. 12. Drainage plan,.including drainage structures located off public right -of- way, must be- evaluated to :insure complete: :�drainage.of property. Might be necessary to document restrictions on grading of lots to insure proper' drainage to on site structures. 13: Suggested street sections must be.evaluated for durability and proper function. MAP �iF .��fb6�� 6 .ice -i -.-1 .... r� •� _ ... -- — _[�:t, is � Z� - -:�- i .. �• ATE L rr`N A. jj '• - �;�� _ '.: -- - -- '+ ;per �:• � , •. '•`�'•••, .:'`.�`'� �.� `' '�',. j . � . - -r - -_ to — - _ .• _ —_. subdivision REQUEST NUMBER: 5 -78 -1 LOCATiON:S. of Interlachen Blvd., N. of Parkwood Rd., W. of Schaefer, & REQUEST: Lincoln. Approximately 50 R -1 lots. �►(ngr t►(ennir� ris•cM�lMrnt vilinge of cling r PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT January 4, 1978 S -78 -1 Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition. Refer to: attached graphic, exerpts from Western Edina Circulation Plan, Council minutes. The subject property is a 102 acre tract of land located in the northwestern part of the city. This property is the last remaining tract of vacant land . remaining in this section of the city. The proponents have submitted a proposed development plan for the entire_ 102 acre parcel. However, only the southeastern 23 acres are proposed for immediate development. For procedural purposes, staff recommends that the development plans for the entire 102 acre tract be considered as a prelimi- nary plat. If this preliminary plat is approved, then the proponents would return with a final plat for only the 23 acre tract which would be called Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition. The entire preliminary plat proposed 176 single family lots. These lots are generally in the 16,000 - 21,000 square foot range. These lots are generally similar in size to other Parkwood Knolls lots to the south and west of the subject property but considerably smaller than lots located to the east. ,Existing ponds and low areas on the subject property are proposed to be used as storm water holding ponds. Of the 176 total lots, 47 lots are proposed for inclusion in Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition. The preliminary plat proposed to extend several roads to serve the subject property. Among these are Willow Wood Road, Larada Road, Larada Lane, Ridge Road, Malibu Drive, and Interlachen Boulevard. In regard to Interlachen Boulevard, the plat does not propose to extend this road on a straight align- ment directly to County Road 18. Rather, a. circuitous arrangement is proposed to discourage excessive through traffic. Traffic Considerations Traffic circulation is of primary concern in the northwestern section of the city. In 1974, a citizens' committee, the Western Edina Task Force, together with a traffic consulting firm,prepared the "Western Edina Circulation Plan." This committee analyzed existing traffic patterns and perceived traffic excesses in the western Edina area and the recommended various alter- natives to alleviate present and future traffic problems. The committee identified four "issue areas" in the western .Edina area which required roadway improvements. The subject property is located in "issue area 4" of.the com mittee's plan Planning Commission Staff. Report Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition Page 2 January 4, 1978 Attached are exerpts from the Western Edina Circulation Plan which deal with issue area 4. As shown, three general roadway alternatives were analyzed for issue area 4. The committee and its consultant recommended a plan whereby Malibu Drive was extended northerly to the County Road 18 interchange, Ridge Road was extended to serve the subject property as were Willow Wood Road and Larada Lane. The committee and the consultant also recommended the.cul- de-sacing of Interlachen Boulevard. Following completion of the Western Edina Circulation Plan, the Council held numerous hearings regarding the plan's adoption. On July 1, 1974, the Council tabled consideration of circulation patterns for issue area 4 until a develop - went proposal was submitted for the northwest Edina area. It was also stated that when such a plan was submitted, it should include some access to the north at the Maloney Avenue - County Road 18 interchange. Parkland Dedication As part of previous Parkwood Knolls subdivisions, the proponents and the City have entered into agreements whereby parkland dedication was deferred until the City determined the location of a park in northwestern Edina. Recently, the City acquired a large tract of land for parks north of the subject property. Therefore, the proponents are suggesting that the accrued parkland dedication from previous Parkwood Knolls subdivisions together with the parkland dedica- tion from the subject property be located adjacent to the recently acquired City property. Staff has computed.that the accrued parkland dedication plus a 5 percent dedication for the subject property _would total 6.8 acres. The proponents are proposing a 5.65 acre dedication. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat in that: 1. The proposal conforms with the Western Edina Land Use Plan. 2. The proposal conforms with the Western Edina Circulation Plan with the exception of the extension of Interlachen Boulevard. 3. Lot sizes are generally compatible with surrounding properties. 4. The proposed extensions of streets to serve the subject property are war- ranted and provide. for the maximum dispersal- of traffic generated from the subject property as well as existing developments. 5. Low areas are appropriately used as storm water holding areas. 6. Adequate access has been provided to Outlot B of Interlachen. Hills 3rd Addition. Planning Commission Staff Report Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition Page 3 January 4, 1977 7. Dedication of parkland adjacent to existing City property is desirable. In regard to Interlachen Boulevard, it again must be stated that the Western Edina Circulation Plan did not recommend extension of this street. However, it should be noted that the Western Edina Task -Force considered only one. possible alignment of Interlachen Boulevard extended; that alignment being the straight westerly extension of Interlachen Boulevard. The task. force was thus concerned that such an extension would turn Interlachen Boulevard into a higher traffic volume collection street. Staff believes, however, that the circuitous alignment proposed by the preliminary plat would discourage excessive through traffic and would improve the dispersal of traffic generated from the subject property. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions and modifications: 1. Malibu: Drive must be extended to the County Road 18 interchange immediately as part of final approval for Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition. 2. The proposed parkland dedication for the entire preliminary plat must be made immediately. The Park Board should be advised that the proponents are indicating a dedication of 1.15 acres less than required. Thus, either an additional 1.15 acres should be dedicated or cash in lieu of such an acreage should be required.. 3. The name of Larada Lane should.be changed to avoid confusion with Larada Road. 4. The property lines of lots located west of Malibu Drive extended should be re- aligned slightly to correspond with the existing R -2 zoning of the southernmost lot. 5. In conjunction wiCh the extension of Malibu Drive, a grading plan for the entire property should be prepared. 6. An executed developer's agreement which includes public improvements to Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition as well as Malibu Drive. GLH:nr 12 -30 -77 ORIGINAL PROPOSAL pp �; • - '^ � r 1 I y'. I /, . I I � I `' �� .. ,� / - 1 , ' /Ili- �,)�'� -r '° sn �', v , _ ..... .......�� /; - , - ` I � I -i_ rte- y�- `' �L � _ ,>fRS '...• -'' ` ,lye'/ ��T: /'` i� fy 3 I i .'� •. � 11\ ,� = J- Imo_ -/ "yYTYYF� ._L - _ I t -`-S%� /i%"' -'�r� I /I � _ -. _- �'�__ - "1- i �f ' / / yn. •r_ -� - --- -��/ ��- 1 L i '±y r I �``. .. �� ` ��'_- � ;.:i .1, .i i'- .� � i 11�` � ` j / /S. y, -. !. _ \ � ,• i �_ /' \/' ,..• -rr -I -'`-- ^cx ?'� � 1_L1� �!-� I � ��`'rJ. I "•� -,'' �` o° •�I / /„r : /'.�, :r. - � / ..'* � ,,- �,,, J - r I \�, 7 i • ice, I _ � , •::..- .. t: - - �^ �`��./ 11...r,ae� xo� I - - -� \ •`\`� {I 1 ` ° / -1'I . �_ I` '1 •.' J.r� 1� ��•i-'" IN mv . -\ \ \ `� � ' `�\ ?` �'' 1 rte` ~ /' C .% � ' \ //� - -- � • s u) - ` \ �.� 1 - �� - .-�___ •� �,� � . orb \ `(... I I � •. /1 ` %' .7 "'' � ... N FO d.; � .. _•_ - � i�.. � . 1 '\ ° �, \ �'� 'mss �' . � `.il , 1 � I � �� I � / zsr '�— ;'%' -_ T . �I --•� i J- l- �/ iil� Ir �� L�4w � I � I ' 1 - .i�� . -. I � �!•. I yl � I II � � � _ ao _ `, .,. -. � \ 1' � 0.- ',, � , _r_ ' I � � I • , ' mil. , � _%`, ,•r - �:.,� � .. � •y .I �- ;.'ate_! — La —I —�_� 1,— '� / ... -- ��I~ = I; y:: - - �, ,I ' <s� ,�.••'' .._.tea . - - -�. - __.___._�- - - - -- -� I II 1 iJl tai I., • /.. %- _ / �r'i'. ' ! �, �.. ,° ..' its -- i `Uwe dib It ' 'W \\_ '+ ` lei• `, Ch oa f i ��-.- r -1 - -. -� -. _�•.: \ _ + -� �f :i7 `.,�� •' G5D �( -ice ,�' \ +- . �•!- \ l�..t � 1 �®, .� ,I 1 IN qqp J \ /��i i ieI``•I y, y !I �• •��r• -7.. \!y " ^V •\ ,' .I° •,� `.- �� i !� ' I j \+ bl. "c; ';\I c..1 _ �' l.% \\ ! �f �_ i .1 '� -�t, MODIFIED PLAN QF ER P_cy MTG I`.- 1 +. � ICI I' + �• I J �- m '�N -- '� S� l"11a / ,� I i .. I I I --- o%�C,\ `' \ �— Jc.a , � �., I.�,.rJr.... ,� ( \ '� I ,\^.' .�1•' -. i \. - ✓ - 1231',.:` T-`�� ®� '�� j i \ +�` �ZY ' \•� / - -� -r \.t��l /A, 7\'(yf�� 112 -1 .�f(1J J D+, a''3=1�I` i. i-- --- 4 a :r�• dw ` rz ! I \• , I •. %,, for ' �� \ ,,_ ♦ •o .r 'i� I�+ ' =i1 -,. •� - X71 1 i ,,.rt�\ I �a: t�l +,\ S �\ f - I a r,+ \` til. - i• 1 - f \_ �, , -- 't `. i �-+�.' 2 ` •" r.' } l ,�, t `j 1 F -- � - r -`l J, .1 .I 1 '' -'?I _ � 1 I i ., ' , y .\ , ..^•. r \; A'o � 1.; 1. .1 i —T r -- `,., "11.1...1 - It �' I1.•9�� `�� _11, "r �'t`.Y:; �' C �A {nu h. �. i,�•• � -` � •; / ; 1 s �r L — 1• ;I i .�•ia\ 4��, i--�. �` l 1�1�I \ i i ..� -J_ � I . : ',1 ,e o' r- � % it :. - ;_'- -1 `r 1 -- � -- �` _� I O ' `rte -T- -- --� •` -, -• .' ' �; \�' I '.•� ~•.� ` \ I L\ -- -�+ �''� ; /�u\ .,i V• f• I 3' I -, I - - -_ ''(� r �l ' 1 1: 9 '! , /I.•, sir °° '•• ,.,,,�J• I -,.,.� C ,� +� � / 7�• � rIT -J_1, ,I1 ii i / � '', ..ar � Mr r. A- 7'7_ 7 �': ' � I � : � ) :• G' ! / „a n� `ti'•�1.` 1' \:'l•;;;,. ♦'� w /J� . .r.. ' ` n jai ,� _ Y! � .::f •!7y ,r".:w,. _ � L-+ I'AiL. I ! t +! \`.� a / Y; \w erica- tee+ •riDA �. .�/., r�. III C ''k;. • , .r.w 'f 1 Z r �,1 i �' ,/r , + - i , `' a \+ •�• - .,} .��! -� •` `'' +� ``\ \ �\\ ,.' t rs �i •+�.+ A !P I. `n+` fiLG�j,1 ` •- �wr.+ay.- .... -.•,. �. �') 1__. ?3. / 'M�� .... _�.� -� :�� A "+•r' f11:, •!�• I1 '� 1 - '�. y, 'e\ �`\�!il\tt ` -./ '+ %'�.r •, - � " I T,1 \ j �''+ —, .�. j� 1 .� �J �•' .,riill'Y� r'.i� .. ,....., �r�'� ";r� �I�::.t "•',.i'' ....r _ .'slxlt,.: \t• ._.,:•i, c• � , / Subdivision No... � = ` SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT To: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department CI . SUBDIVISION NAME: r J v WtLa_ LAND SIZE: 1 .(p Q c, LAND VALUE: (By: Date: ) The developer of this subdivision -has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land B. dedicate �+ % of the land C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of.applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an.existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or _stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged 0 or-otherwise improved-for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his - toric value. 6. B. Cash Required 0 1. In all other instances than above. E 2. I, _ /... �_+ J .1 i.'..J `• I n � 'I � \.. ,. .. �•`_ '�. r .t. '. ' - -._ r;._ Jl_.._1•l -. � .1, , 1 •`L ' '5 -`' `\ d l ' I 1 �� Z �j ,�_. _-. �-i +=T• r i _ .. �r� i � f ta. 1 L f1:�/ 1 F. o ' i r.� i (� � � -� � ,11 r l ' i . �� r I ��, t�, I I I • `' � '� _ --- � r..- _--M��T-- 1�atfrf J r/lr'44 } { I II�:.. ,. yy , +.�F�11•_I � � ��`'� : •-.� -- 3 1�"•. °cl'� 1 °'°+'� 4 4T J I T rl T I• r t '. i= fi, �� " s' l'1 ' . , ' _l- .t- .�.- ,•� -�-.. � I j l 4 7_r7 _i 1�'+ -� - -pJ ,�,` -�, -�} `•' 1 � , r J t r,'. , . S:c,� 3. F� �-+c t-� 1 -`J:�' �L, ' r I �' r l I } � \ .� • � � � � -' �'- • - TiL -' �� J c r 1 i ':roe• • ��' �4� -•i' +� . !r � �['�LI 1 �Y�' i ��' f� • ��_`� ", j I - I � -- '` � l J J / Ir. rf.• i:�Sl' j 1 '�{ T .� ,; �` � _ '- j _ •� -'t I -•- /. ...i � � I r • •` •'�� .. �.� l :.1.. L� I1/- -�I.7� I {II�I'ry/ /1�I�{ ,�tk\ 4 rt.. = T� J'yI� �--t �_ -.- � ! �iJ•.� \ -T' T T at a•-i �r-'•i Jr;, -'• `:��:;"G`; . :Elh �y i I �I -�.l 1 �, l l'•t.4:':..�` i,`` �t �':� '' . f ,.:z L r'��r '1 - �rj i Cbtii.__ '• .3K , r '.. 7 ;•� � \ t ba:�R3m� � 1 � _ ��1� � .L _ f ��C �'! J.. r - ' � I. .... ... '� I .n• 1•- .. � 1 � � t •t� '`t �` �� < � 1 I t 4J. l,i.l,..t +�L � � i L --•-�- I i �.�a�• 1 l•? -�.•,. ,. i - !.. I _. i � � � ' "� � , \:.`- ;` '�, "►e„1 ;yl�t�, -� � •��,.. LL inb-1 ifs ' f -! �`` , / . ._....... ��' � " ��I(•��,rT;r� J. .__. I � I ! �'� ti `• •��s;.. -: �l.�� •'� � �yl,t'I�I'II �,f�� .(' �� .... . � !l.i�"!n 'T�rr!•TT -- I i 1 1 r 4 -L. - _1- ,_.l._.�....li �j '\ i( •. / r! / t .. '� •�Ir r�•, '`tx)'- __.� —~ _ .I •P�� E I •� � ' li fi::.L'__' � -� � �l. �..:4�J lC f ; e :4) f---�- i Lf rw-r• r 7r'�Y . \ --1-�— i t.� /+ ti. u ��, •4- Y�7AT_ /v� r'r �- r. :..;:.ij�r' . •;:•:. I _ �~ -x.' �; ' I `' l 11 ;,- -_ -- 1:...;:; {'�.► :�'�till •I;;,�I: L.�r. 1J-�1 � ' � __ yll•,�,_. �: � ,. ` ` _'''�. � "'! Y -T �1 1111E �a�^— '1:r:::}:.j , : _i: }�". - may.• -' � O I s / - eta---- t ---i :, rr , , 4., -- j�,,,;r•• - - - "'.:Y= ' ~ ._._ � t� � | It 1 EPH / � . . ~ | | / |� x AV AV AC?k 09 VAN Wawa gnomes Issue Area 4 The traffic issue within Area 4 is how should Interlachen Blvd. and Ridge Road relate the street system that will service the Issue Area and relate to the proposed interchange at County Road 18. The alternative street plans to resolve the issue include (Figure 12): Alternative 1: extend Interlachen Blvd. to County Road 18 aid to develop the street system with connections to Interlachen, Malibu, Ridge Road, Larada Lane and Willow Wood. Alternative 2: cu.l -de -sac Interlachen Blvd. and develop the street system with connections to the same streets as in Alternative 1. Alternative 3: cul -de -sac Interlachen Blvd. and Ridge mad and develoo the street system with connection to the same streets as in Alter native 1 except il. Road. The full development of the single family.residential land in the Issue Area is expected to generate an additional 3900 trips per day. The street system developed for the Issue Area will have to support 'these trips. If Interlachen .,4ere open to County Road 18, it is estiriated that 40% of the additional trips or 1560 vehicles per day would travel to the east. • 23 flu®®®® m «� u n, J n i AVV . �.v�r•Int FhY � '_% � Mill O.'T Y AY E CUL -DE -SAC . I n u 41 1.. 4l �S ISSUE AREA 4 Alternative 1 Strengths Alternative 1 Weaknesses maximum residential accessibility. transforming a local street, Interlachen, in- best emergency vehicle access.. to a collector. negative traffic volume and land use impact on homes along Interlachen. Alternative 2 Strengths Alternative 2 Weaknesses increases residential acc.essibil.ity. increasCs.emergency vehicle access. ' good local /collector street relationship. i/t1 -y -.. ^ cam...,_ Alternutl \'e rj I Le. ilu 1. I L' E J J LI C Il� l.hS - -- minimum increase.in resi- dential accessibility to the east. negative traffic volume impact to the south and east. The evaluation of 'the above alternatives led to the selection of Alternative 2 as best meeting the evaluation criteria. 33 PvK'PA:',Fn F04 PLANNIN.(7, TFIS MAP IS pt;rtr,C)crS AND !"WW�.n '-",'IT VF SCAI FD WHEIV-_ ACCURAIE iea�ASUHEIACNTS ARL ALOUIRED F'ry I(N111, 1500, - 0_1 CL�)L-DE-SAC 0 Mirror L 0*6 own uj oil (A I CUL-DE-SAC c QSE�- RO V UACATE RIGHT TURN ONLY -y 'A' \Ulf A D C ILLAC UNK q CUL-DE-SAC c1% �' LK E 44 FIGURE 14 RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION PLAN OF TASK FORCE MAJORITY 11.111... !m1 11 %1 J.r i f••r = IgI 1tl G k CUL- D_�-SAC ® � C _„n, THIS M.AP IS PP PArtFD FO'T PLANNING �• PLtRPOSES ANO S4O�t«p NOT SCALF.D WHERE ACCU• i,.fE lr.EASURLMENTS ARE REAU1RED �ryt�' 1500' E EL%'D CTCUL-DIE-S-AC n tr e i 6,Q Yp DL r: LL \N 9Q a I J L D ( }M7j �. '> C U ics Mirror \ L ake Af FIGURE 15 RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION PLAN OF CONSULTANT ND SLIGHT MINORITY; OF TASK FORCE e ' -r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY BALL ON MONDAY JULY 1, 1974 ` Answering rollcall were Council members Courtney, Johnson, Schmidt, Shaw and Mayor Van Valkenburg. MINUTES of June 3, 1974, were approved as presented by motion of Councilman Shaw, seconded by Councilman Courtney and carried. ISSUE AREA 2 CONTINUED• ISSUE AREA 4 OF WESTERN EDINA TRAFFIC TASK FORCE TABLED UNTIL FURTHER PUTTED. Issue Area 4 - Mr. Dunn recalled that at the meeting of June 3, 1974, Issue Area 4 had been continued to this meeting to give residents an opportunity to study -� the matter further. Mr. Jack Liebenberg, 5112 Ridge Road, said that he repre- sented twenty -four property owners on Ridge Road and Interlachen Blvd., and that his group does not feel that decisions made on any of the other Issue Areas in Western Edina have any impact or effect on Issue Area 4. He said that he had talked with Messrs. Carl and Harvey Hansen, the major property owners of the undeveloped property in the area, and that they had no definite plans or plats to submit for final development at the present time and that it might be several years before they are ready to do so. As requested by Mr. Liebenberg, Councilman Johnson's motion was then seconded by Councilman Courtney to table i.. consideration of the traffic circulation pattern for Issue Area 4, with the p understanding that when and if Mr. Hansen comes in with overall development 00 plans for the property that he owns, that the plat should include some access p= to the North at the Maloney Avenue interchange. On rollcall there were five W w ayes and no nays and the motion was carried. Issue Area 2 - Mr. Dunn recalled that at the meeting of June 3, 1974, the City Attorney had been directed to render an opinion as to whether the City could legally construct a road connecting Walnut Drive and Londonderry Road as pro - posed in Alternative 1 and as to whether the City could legally build a road across existing park land to connect Londonderry Drive with Gleason Road as proposed in Alternative 5. Mr. Erickson had also been requested to determine whether or not a road has already been established from Walnut Drive to London- derry Road over and across Nine Mile Creek. Mr.- Erickson summarized his opinion on the road between Walnut Drive and Londonderry Road by stating that if the believes that it is now in the best interest of the City to open the iCouncil road, it should not do so without first obtaining a declatory judgment that ` the road exists or that the property across Nine Mile Creek was conveyed to the City free of any implied restriction that it be used for park purposes. He said that if the Council believes the road should not now be opened, it is recommended that no action now be taken either to vacate or abandon the road and that the City can best retain its future options relative to this 'connect - ion by taking no such action at this time. Mr. Erickson summarized his opinion as to whether or not the City could build a road across existing park land to connect Londonderry Drive with Gleason Road by saying that it would appear that the City cannot legally construct that portion of the road which would run through the park unless approval would be granted by the Secretary of HUD and unless the deed from the Minnesota Conference of the United Church ' of Christ, whereby a part of the road area was conveyed to Edina, could be changed to allow such use. In reply to questions of Mr. Lloyd Cherne, 5704 View Lane, Mr. Erickson listed the following three conditions under which the conversion of HUD lands could be used for public roads: 1. The conversion is essential to the orderly development and growth of the area involved; 2. The conversion is in accord with the comprehensively planned development of the urban area; and 3. The open -space land is being or will be replaced without cost to the Federal Government by other open space land or at least equal fair market value at the time of conversion and of nearly as feasible equivalent usefulness and location. Mr. Erickson clarified that a more serious problem was that the land between Londonderry Road and the HUD parcels had been dedicated for park purposes by the Minnesota Conference of the United Church of Christ, which property the City has no authority under the law to divert. Mr. Cherne suggested that the property could be deeded back to the church and then use condemnation through eminent domain for the road. Mr. Erickson told Mr. Cherne that specific legislative authority would be necessary for such action. Mr._ Cherne then suggested that if the land could be given back to the church, the road built and assessed against the church, that the church would be probably ?more than glad" to give the pro - perty back to the City for road purposes. Ile also suggested that the City could do an environmental study to satisfy NEPA and that the Council could declare a moratorium on any additional building in the area. Mr. Cherne added that this -r 10 G 1 7/1/74 road would be needed for a collector road.if Carl Hansen is to continue to develop _ his property. Mr. William D. Stickel, 5900 Tamarac Lane', said that his property - abuts the park and reminded Council that on June 3, 1974, 87% of the home owners had indicated that they would not want the road through the park. Councilman Johnson then moved, based on the attorney's opinion, that Alternative 1, the construction f of a road connecting Walnut Drive.and Londonderry Road,.be tabled. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays ,- and the motion carried. Mr. Hyde then recalled that the Park Board and .the Envir- onmental Quality Commission had both recommended against Alternative 5 under. Which the City would build a road across existing park land to connect Londonderry Drive with Gleason Road. Councilman Courtney's motion was then seconded by Councilman Johnson that Alternative 5 of Issue Area 2 be tabled for further study. On roll - i call there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Council's attention was then called to a letter signed by the owners of seven properties requesting placement of STOP signs at the intersection_ of Continental Drive and Stauder Circle and at the blind corner across from 6508 Stauder Circle. Dr. Lloyd Pear- son, 5700 View Lane, requested specific action for Issue Area 2. He said that it would soon be three years since neighbors presented their petition for traffic relief and that before long there would be 4,500 trips per day at the intersection of View Lane and Schaefer Road. He objected that the trial blockade at Schaefer Road and South Knoll Drive which were supposed to permit right turns only going South on Schaefer Road had been improperly placed so that drivers could go around the blockade. He also contended that the blockades were not left up long enough to obtain sufficient information on traffic patterns. With the aid of the view- graph, Dr. Pearson made the following suggestions: 1. Installation of the blockade at Londonderry Road and Stauder Circle should • be on the East side of.the intersection to permit access to the park but prevent access to the East. 2. Installation of the blockade at Schaefer Road and South Knoll Drive should be moved to the middle of the block of Schaefer Road between South Knoll Drive and Stauder Circle. 3. Reinstall the blockade at South Knoll Drive and View Lane. Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney amended his motion to the effect that the suggestions of Dr. Pearson also be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee and that Mr. Wolsfeld work with the Committee. The motion also called F for continuing the matter to July 15, 1974. Councilman Courtney's amended motion i was seconded by Councilman Johnson and on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the motion carried. Mr. Wolsfeld suggested that the blockades be set up one at a time to obtain the effect of each individual blockade. Mr. Erickson said that he would have an opinion before -the next Traffic Safety Committee Meet - ing as to the legality of closing the streets. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT ST.S -139 APPROVED. Mr. Dunn recalled that at the meeting of June 3, 1974, Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -139 proposed to be constructed in Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to approximately 900 feet South of the South line of Hyde Park Drive had been continued to work out details with the developers : of Hyde Park 2nd Addition. He said that the details had not been completely final- ized as yet but recommended approval in view of the fact that no objections were heard at this meeting. Councilman Johnson thereupon offered the following resolu- tion and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERI%- STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT ST.S -139 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused.notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvement: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF CITY STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -139 IN.THE FOLLOWING: Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to approximately 900 feet South of the South line of Hyde Park Drive and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the � Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully TA advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with.the construc- tion of said improvement as described in Notice of Public Hearing and including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary.easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improve - ment; -that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT N0. ST.S -139; and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include all lots and tracts of land within . the following described boundaries: Commencing at the,Northeast corner of Outlot "D ".Hyde Park Addition; thence .Sly and.SEly along the West line of Gleason Road to the most Nly corner of Outlot "C" Hyde Park Addition; thence SWly ArcNeds EnVem PUrros VM LaSalle Amwe Mrmeaoolts Mrmsota 55403 161213321401 December 29, 1977 Mr. Gordon Hughes Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition Dear Mr. Hughes: �g n�5 I understand there will be a hearing concerning the above referenced proposed addition on January 4, 1978. Unfortunately, I will be out of town and unable to attend; so I am writing you expressing my opposition to a portion of the proposed addition and asking.that my opposition be recorded in the minutes of that meeting. Specifically I am opposed to the extension of Ridge Road into the new addition. The plat submitted by Mr. Hansen does not indicate Ridge Road extended and I understand from your planner, Mr. Harold Sand that your department. has initiated this modification to Mr. Hansen's submittal. Mr. Sand enumerated many planning principles why the extension of Ridge Road should be made and in my mind pushed aside reasons that it should not be made. If Ridge Road were opened it would increase traffic considerably on a road that is too narrow for any increased traffic load. Traffic speeds would naturally increase and this concerns me greatly as a father. The next obvious solution in the eyes of your planners would be to widen the road. How insensitive, to asthetically destroy the charm and character of a country road and enviornmertally harm the area by taking out the beautiful trees and scrubs that now line the road. I ask you to reconsider this recommendation by your department in light of safety, asthetics, enviornment, cost and the wishes of the residences of Ridge Road. There are other segments of the project I wish to comment on but brevity prevents me from doing so in this letter. I hope to have a chance to comment in future meetings on this subject. Sincerely, W.R. Nordgren, AIA Residence: 5016 Ridge Road WRN /bw cc: Jack Liebenberg Edina, Minnesota January 10, 1978 The i:ayor and City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Proposed Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition Gentlemen and ,Madame: At your meeting of February 6, 1978, you will be asked to give preliminary plat approval to Park-wood Knolls 20th Addition, proposed by Carl 1.1. Hansen. At its meeting on January 4, 1978, the Planning Commission approved the plat, provided that Ridge Road in the proposed subdivision not connect with the existing Ridge Road outside the subdivision. We, the undersigned, are homeowners along Willow Wood Road and Kingsberry Drive adjacent to the southeast corner of the proposed subdivision. We do not object to the pro- posed subdivision, but we do object to the stipulation that there be no con- nection between the two parts of Ridge Road. Park-wood 'Knolls 20th Addition, as proposed, will have 47 lots to be developed in the immediate future and a large outlot to be replatted later and de- veloped into approximately 118 additional lots. The developer proposed that access to the first 47 lots be by four streets -- Ridge Road to the north, Willow Wood Road to the southeast, Larada Road to the south and Larada Lane to the southwest. The staff of the Planning Commission has recommended that there be as many access points as possible. Homeowners along the existing Ridge Road convinced the Planning Commission that there should be no access to the proposed subdivision from Ridge Road. They argued that their street is too narrow to handle the increased traffic and that the topography prevented widening the street. They enjoy their peaceful cul -de -sac and don't want any through traffic. There are 14 homes along Ridge Road. We homeowners along Willow :flood Road and Kingsberry Drive also enjoy our peaceful cul -de -sacs. We also don't want any through traffic. We also occupy 14 homes adversely affected by the proposed subdivision. But, we do not intend to stand in the way of the proposed development. All we'ask is that the inconvenience of additional traffic be shared widely and fairly. Without a connection to the existing Ridge Road there would be no direct ac- cess between the first 47 lots and points northeast, north, northwest and west. Traffic which would have been handled by Ridge Road will almost certainly be funneled through 71.7illow Wood Road and not through Larada Road and Larada Lane, which are less convenient. It is unfair that we should bear the extra traffic so that the existing Ridge Road can remain undeveloped. The Mayor and City Council City of Edina Page No. 2 January 10, 1978 Access now to Ridge Road will be only a temporary inconvenience to the existing homeowners. The future development of the remainder of Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition should assure more direct and easier access to points to the north, northwest and west. As the remainder of the subdivision is developed, traffic on Ridge Road will decrease and street widening will not be necessary. We urge you to make the connection between the existing Ridge Road and the proposed Ridge Road. Respectfully submitted, 7 Edina, nx. 55436. 20th. January, 1978. The -4ayor and City Councillors, City of Edina, 4802 West 54th. Street, Edina, N9. 55424. Mr. lfayor and City Councillors, Re: Proposed Parkwood Knolls, 20th. Addition. we the undersigned, residents of Westwood Court and Schaefer Road, view with great concern the proposal to direct the major traffic flow to the new development via [willow Wood Road. Schaefer Road already poses a serious traffic problem. Due to the rural appearance of the section North of Westwood Court, vehicles ignore the 30 m.p.h. sign and hurtle over the hill into the residential area at 40 - 45 m.p.h. This renders exit from Westwood Court and Villow Wood Road extremely hazardous, especially in icy weather. Schaefer Road does not have a proper sidewalk and there are many children living in the area. It is thanks to the vigilance of the parents that a serious car /pedestrian accident has been averted. A heavier traffic flow would greatly increase the existing hazards. Multi -car pile ups and pedestrian injuries would be inevitable. We feel that the major access to the new development should not be via Ilillow [good Road. f Yours sincerely, ,G � �� `��L - � �K.� L' r �� h - � � ,�- c .�� ti�^-O' . -� i A- DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343`` P 1'NES HENNEPIN _ - LF..0935 -3381 25 January 1978 S / � NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF WEED INSPECTOR Enclosed are forms for the appointment of a - weed inspector in your municipality. It is L.t J required that the enclosed forms be filled out r and sent to the proper authorities. Please do this by February 15, 1978. /9 Sincerely, W William J. Brenna Assistant Agricultural Inspector WJB /lp Enclosure - HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer oNESpT� y0 OF TKPp�o January 6, 1978 Minnesota Department of Transportation District 5 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 In Reply Refer To: 315 S.P. 2785 -188 (I -494) At the Interchange of C.S.A.H. 18 Dear Mr/bls : (612)545 -3761 The IIfinnesota Department of Transportation, (Mn /DOT), will hold a public hearing to discuss location, major design features, and social - economic effects of proposed improvements at the interchange of I -494 and C.S.A.H. 18, in Bloomington, Hennepin County, State Project Number 2785 -188. The hearing is scheduled for February 212 1978, at 7:15 P.M. in conjunction with the regular meeting of the City Council of Bloomington in the Council Chambers, located in the Municipal Building, 2215 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota. The Municipal Building will be open at 6:15 P.M. to tallow interes�ued parties to re- vJien the proposed project and attend an in- formal meeting prior to the public hearing. Mn /DOT personnel will be present to discuss the proposal and answer any questions. Written statements and other exhibits in place of or in addition to oral statements will be accepted at the hearing and during a ten day period following the hearing. These statements and documents will be made a part of the official record. A project development report along with maps, drawings, and other pertinent information are available for public inspection and copying at the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Bassett Creek Office, located at 5801 Duluth Street, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422• Written statements or inquiries should be addressed to the District Information Officer, H. W. Harholdt. Enclosed is an index map showing the location of the proposed project. Sing ly, a William i . w��l ra, District Director Enclosure: Index Map WMC :ra An Equal Opportunity Employer s � 1 ` ��NNESpTq °- Minnesota Department of Transportation PC -<C" QO District 5 OF Tik 2055 No. Lilac Drive Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422 (612)545 -3761 January 61 1978 In Reply Refer To: 315 S.P. 2785 -188 (I -494) At the Interchange of C.S.A.H. 18 Dear Mr/Ms: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, (Mn /DOT), will hold a public hearing to discuss location, major design features, and social - economic effects of proposed improvements at the interchange of I -494 and C.S.A.H. 18, in Bloomington, Hennepin County, State Project Number 2785 -188. The hearing is scheduled for February 21, 1978, at 7:15 P.M. in conjunction with the regular meeting of the City Council of Bloomington in the Council Chambers, located in the Municipal Building, 2215 West Old Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota. The Municipal Building will be open at 6:15 P.M. to allow interested paa —bics to rcvieer the proposed project and attend an in- formal meeting prior to the public hearing. Mn /DOT personnel will be present to discuss the proposal and answer any questions. Written statements and other exhibits in place of or in addition to oral statements will be accepted at the hearing and during a ten day period following the hearing. These statements and documents will be made a part of the official record. A project development report along with maps, drawings, and other pertinent information are available for public inspection and copying at the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Bassett Creek Office, located at 5801 Duluth Street, Golden Valley, Minnesota 55422. Written statements or inquiries should be addressed to the District Information Officer, H. W. Harholdt. Enclosed is an index map showing the location of the proposed project. Sinc ely, i WWilliain wf r� . District Director Enclosure: Index Map WMC : ra An Equal Opportunity Employer -011o® I EDEN PR41RIE WASHINGTON AV E. -w O N73 �,�\ I lit WOODS ROAD Ab .7 1 1t ------ 113 - � ti 13 �Ic 1 ' \ �CIS �$ rn C) ,ice I It FTI 0 z O Co 0 Rl 0 0 zi l TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, H.R.A.-Exe:cutive Director SUBJECT: City /H.R.A. Loan Agreement Attached is a loan agreement between the City and the H.R.A. A similar agreement which required annual renewal was entered into in past years as part of.the 50th and France Project. The proposed agreement eliminates the necessity for annual renewal and would serve as the vehicle for'the lending of funds from the City to the H.R.A. for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project. Staff recommends execution of the agreement. GLH•ks 2/2/78 cc: Mayor and Council LOAN AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into as of this.first day.of January, 1976, by and between the CITY OF EDINA', a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota (herein- after called "Edina "), and.the HOUSING ANID REDEVELOPITENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA. (hereinafter called "H.R.A. ".), WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant.to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.581, Edina has the authority to make loans or contributions for,.and to do every .and. all things necessary or convenient to aid and cooperate in.the planning., undertaking, construction -or operation of, redevelopment projects within the City of Edina_ undertaken by the H.R.A.. pursuant to,.and as defined by, Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq., known as the Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Act, (the "Act's) (which redevelopment projects are hereinafter called the "Projects'.'); and WHEREAS, Edina and the.- H:R.`A. have previously entered into a loan agreements, for Projects for the years 1974:and 19752 and now desire to enter into a continuing agreement for the lending and contribut- ing of funds on the terms and conditions below set out.. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and.agreements herein set forth, Edina and.the H.R.A. do hereby agree as follows: 1. Edina does hereby agree to contribute and loan to the H.R.A., and the H.R.A. does hereby agree to take and borrow from Edina, funds for the planning and carrying out of Projects within the City of Edina, which are from time to time approved by Edina, including Projects'previously approved by Edina. .2. The amount to be contributed and loaned to the H.R.A. from time to time (hereinafter called the "Funds "), shall not be in excess of (i) the amount then budgeted for that purpose by Edina for the fiscal } �1 year .of Edina in which the contribution or loan is to be made, or. (ii) the amount then approved by'the'City Council of Edina if no amount has then been so budgeted, but Edina shall.have no obligation to approve any amount not so budgeted. 3 The Funds shall.be. paid to the H.R.A. in such amounts (sub. ject, however, to the restriction.set out in paragraph 2 hereof), and at such times as the,H.R.A. shall from time to time request... 4. All Funds paid to the H.R.A. shall be allocated by the H.R.A., to.the-greatest extent possible and permissible under-the Acts to a Project as a public redevelopment cost, as such term is defined in the Act (the "Allocated Funds" }.. 5. All Allocated Funds shall be repaid to. Edina with.interest at the same.rate of interest as ,Edina then.(as.of'.the date the Funds are disbursed by Edina) charges -on special assessments levied by Edina, with such interest to be charged on the unpaid portion from time to time outstanding and from the date said Funds are disbursed by Edina to the H.R.A. until repaid. All'Tunds not'so allocated (the "Nonallocated Funds ") by the H.R.A. to a redevelopment project as a public redevelopment cost shall be a contribution by Edina to the H.R.A. and need'not be repaid to Edina. All Funds.shall be deemed Allocated Funds when first paid to the.H.R.A. and shall bear interest from the respective dates paid' to.the H.R.A. .However, the H.R.A. shall give a written report to Edina within thirty (30) days after December 31 of each year during the existence of this Agreement, of the respective amounts of Allocated and Nonallocated Funds, as determined by it;- and.the total of such Nonallocated Funds shall be.deemed to have been first paid out to the H.R.A. under this Agreement.. and, including interest thereon, need not be repaid to Edina. The balance- of the funds paid out hereunder shall be Allocated Funds bearing interest as above determined. 6. The Allocated Funds, with'interest, shall be repaid to Edina out of funds received by the li.R.A. from such Projects, with.each such payment made.to Edina to be applied first to interest then due'and the balance to principal. The H.R.A. shall make every eff.ort�to repay the, -2- Allocated Funds, with interest, to I'dina as soon as possible, but, as stated, shall be obligated to make repayments only out of funds received from .such ,,Projects., 7. None of the Funds .sh•a11_ be-used, in any way for, or in • sup port of, directly or indirectly, any public housing projects as defined. R in the Act. 8. The H.R.A. shall allocate all of the Funds which it can properly and legally 'al'locate 'tb a Project as public redevelopment costs, so that the maximum amount of the Funds will constitute Allocated Funds under this Agreement. 9. The H.R.A. shall keep accurate books and records of all of its financial transactions in. a. manner consistent with accepted- accounting principles, and shall maintain all such books and records at its main office at 4801 West '50th Street,.Edina, Minnesota. Edina, and its autho- rized representatives and agents, shall have the right to examine and copy, all such books and records at-reasonable intervals during normal business hours. 10. All notices, reports or demands required or permitted to -be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to any officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope., with registered or certified mail postage prepaid thereon, . addressed to the parties at the following addresses: To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City ;Tanager To H.R.A.: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: Executive Director Such addresses may be changed by.either party upon notice to the other party given as herein provided. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instru- ment to be duly-executed-as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA by Its Mayor -3- 1r and zi Its ;Tanager HOUSING AND REDEVELOP:IENT AUTHORITY OF'EDINA, MINNESOTA i by Its Chairman and STATE OF MINNESOTA) Its Secretary SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1978, by James VanValkenburg and Kenneth E. Rosland, as Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina. STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before .me this day of , 1978, by Charles W. Freeburg and Lawrence W..Rixe, as Chairman and Secretary,. respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. -4- MEMORANDUM TO: Kenneth.Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, H.R.A. Executive Director SUBJECT: Tax Increment Pledge Agreement Attached is a tax increment pledge agreement which has been authorized by the H.R.A. for the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area. This agreement is very similar to.that executed for the 50th and France project. :The effect of this agreement is to pledge all -tax increments received from lands in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area to the.. repayment of public redevelopment costs in the area. Staff recommends execution of the agreement. GLH:ks 2/2/78 cc: _Mayor and Council TAR INCRE'MrNT PLEDGE AGREEMENT (Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area) THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of 1977, by and between the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the.laws.of the.State of Minnesota, party of the first part (the "Authority "),,.- and.the..City of Edina, a municipal. -cor -. poration.under the laws of the State of Minnesota, panty of the, second part, (the "City "); WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, under and pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat., Sec... 462•.521, the Authority applied to the City Council of the City for approval of the undertaking of .a redevelopment project (the "Project ") in the Southeast area of Edina, Minnesota (the "Project Area "), pursuant to a re- development plan entitled "Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" dated Septem- ber 21, 1977 (the . "Plan "), which Plan.includes a statement of the method proposed for financing the Project, which application was accompanied by the written opinion of the City Planning Commission thereon dated September 28, 1977; and WHEREAS, by Findings and Determinat ions , by., and. Resolutions of, the City Council adopted October 17, 1977, after published notice and public hearing as required by law, the City Council found, among other findings, that the land in the Project Area would not be made available for redevelopment without the financial aid to be sought, that the Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the locality as a whole, for the redevelopment of the Project Area °,Yby °private- -enterprise,'° -and that the Plan conforms to general plans for the development of the locality as a whole, and by said Resolutions the City Council approved said Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council, by said Resolutions adopted October 17, 1977, also approved the use of tax increment financing in the Project Area; and WHEREAS, under and pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat., Sec. 462.585, Subd. 2 and 3, the Authority, by letter dated October , 1977, requested the County Auditor of Hennepin County to certify the assessed valu- ation of all taxable real property within said Project Area as then most recently determined,for the purpose of determining the original taxable value of the property within the Project Area, and of all tax increments to be remitted to the Authority, all as set out in, and as determined by, Minn. Stat. Sec-:. 462.585; and WHEREAS, in order to pay the public redevelopment cost of the Project, including interest thereon, the Authority will hereafter, from time to time, request the City Council to issue general obligation bonds of the City in aid of the Project, pursuant to the provisions of Minn. Stat., Sec:, 462.581, and Chap. 475; and WHEREAS, under and pursuant to Minn. Stat., Sec. 462.585, Subd. 4, the Authority is authorized to pledge and appropriate any part or all of the tax increments received for the Project, and any part or all of the revenues received from lands in the Project Area while owned by the Authority, for the payment of the principal of and interest on such bonds issued by the City, and to enter into this Agreement with the City Council respecting such pledge. -2- r NOW, THEREFORE, the Authority and the City mutually covenant and agree as follows: 1. The City agrees, from time to time, upon written request of the Authority, to issue and sell bonds,.in such amounts as the Authority may request, for the payment of the public redevelopment cost of the Project, as defined by Minn. Stat., Sec. 4.62.545, Subd. 1, subject, however, to a determination being made by the City Council at the time of each such request that the amount of bonds then requested, with interest, and all prior bonds, with interest, then issued pursuant hereto, can be fully repaid according to the terms of the respective bond issues from the tax increments and revenues hereby pledged. 2. The Authority, in support of each such request, shall.submit . a then current statement as to costs incurred and estimated to be incurred, and tax increments and revenues received.and estimated to be received, from the inception to the completion of the Project, and such other financial data as the City Council may request to support the bond issue then requested by the Authority. 3. All proceeds of bonds issued by the City pursuant hereto, all revenues and tax increments with respect to the Project that are received by the City from the Authority, and all income from the investment thereof, shall be segregated by the City in a •Ispeci'al ;fund, which - shall -be zused by the City solely for the payment of the principal of and interest on said bonds and for the payment of the public redevelopment cost of the Project. 4. The Authority pledges and appropriates all'of the tax increments to be received for the Project, and all of the revenues received from lands in the Project Area :.while owned by the- Authority, to the amounts needed for the payment of the principal of and interest on bonds issued by the City pursuant hereto, and agrc_ -. -3 to segregate all such tax increments and revenues in a special account on its official books and records, and to cause them, as received, to be credited and remitted to said special fund of the City. On or prior to the date of certification of City taxes in each year for collection by the County, the City Treasurer shall transfer from said fund to the sinking fund maintained for the payment of said bonds, under the provisions of Minn. Stat., Sec. 475.61, an amount sufficient to pay all principal and interest then due and to become due-in the. following year on said bonds. All other moneys in the special fund of the City, over and above that required for transfer. to said sinking fund, shall be paid to the Authority upon requisition by the Authority, in payment or reimbursement of the public redevelopment cost of the Project. 5. When the entire public redevelopment cost of the Project has been paid, including interest, and including payment, or provision of a balance in the sinking fund sufficient for the payment, of all principal and interest on bonds issued by the City pursuant hereto, the Authority shall report such fact to the City Council and shall submit a final statement of the public redevelopment cost, with interest, tax increments, and revenues. Upon approval of such report by the City Council, the payment of the public redevelopment cost shall be reported to the County Auditor. 6. An executed copy of this Agreement shall be filed with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, and shall constitute the request and authorization of the Authority and the City to the County Auditor and Treasurer to compute, 9 collect, segregate, and remit said tax increments in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement and of Minn. Stat., Sec. 462.585, Subd. 2 through 4, .inclusive. -4- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and the Authority have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on their behalf and their seals to be hereunto affixed and such signatures and seals to be attested, as of the day and year first above written. THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA by Its and Its CITY OF EDINA by Its Mayor and Its Manager. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1977, by and as and respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. -5- b ' 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) day of r.. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1977, by JAMES VAN VALKENBURG and KENNETH E-. ROSLAND as Mayor and ,tanager, respectively, of the City of Edina. -6- MEMORANDUM TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner SUBJECT: Planning Assistance Grant Contract Some time ago, the Council authorized the transmittal of an application to the Metropolitan Council for a $10,701 planning assistance grant. This grant is to be used to defray costs associated with plans prepared pursuant to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. The Metropolitan Council has approved the City's grant application and has now submitted a contract for our execution. Upon execution, the City will receive 90% of its grant allocation. Following completion of the work program as specified in Appendix B, the City will receive the remaining 10 %. Staff recommends execution of the contract. GLH:ks 2/3/78 cc: Mayor and Council Contract No. GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE I METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND CITY OF EDINA THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of C , 197_, by and between the Metropolitan ouncil, hereinafter referred to as the "Council, and the City of Edina , hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee." WHEREAS, the Council is required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.851, et seq., to administer the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, hereinafter referred to as the "Act," which requires local governmental units within the Metropolitan Area to.prepare comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature by Laws 1976, Chapter 167, has made available and required the Council to administer a fund to be utilized to assist local governments in the carrying out of required planning in the form of Planning Assistance Grants; and WHEREAS the Council desires to assist the Grantee in carrying out required comprehensive planning in accordance with the Act. NOW THEREFORE, the Council and Grantee agree as follows: 1. A. The Council shall pay to the Grantee, in accor- dance with the schedule set forth below, a total grant amount of $ 10,701.00 Grant funds . shall be made available to the Grantee as follows: $ 9,631.00 immediately upon _execution of this agreement. $ 1,070.00 upon satisfactory evaluation by the Council of the Funded Portion Completion Report submitted by the Grantee pursuant to Paragraph 4B of this agreement. B. The Grantee agrees that no more than 75% of the total cost of carrying out the work program set forth in Grantee's application for grant assistance, Appendix A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, shall be financed by grant funds. C. The Grantee shall utilize the grant funds to carry out the activities specified in the funded portion of the work program set forth in Appendix B, attached hereto and made a part hereof. D. The Grantee agrees to comply with all provisions of the Metropolitan Council Application Award and Disbursement Guidelines for the Administration of Planning Assistance Grants, hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines," dated-April, 1977, which is hereby ;incorporated by reference into this agreement . and made a part hereof. -2- 2. Authorized use of grant proceeds. It is understood.and agreed that the following costs and expenses shall be the only,such costs and.expenses paid for out of grant proceeds.. Costs and expenses to be reimbursed, shall additionally be in substantial accord with specifications contained in the grantee's grant application and other provisions contained herein, but in no event shall the Council reimburse the Grantee for costs and expenses incurred in excess of the total grant amount. The following costs specifically incurred in carrying out the planning activities required by the Act and specified in the funded portion of the work program shall be payable from grant proceeds: A. Compensation of existing staff. B. Compensation of newly hired staff. C. Employment of a qualified consultant(s). D. Payment of'other costs such as overhead, rental of space and equipment, purchase o='supplies, printing and publishing. E. Payment of costs incurred in eligible inventory activities undertaken since the date of passage of the Act. 3. Accounting. A. The grantee.agrees.to establish-.and maintain accurate and complete accounts.and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of any and all grant funds including, but not.limited to documentation and information relating to the selection and payment of consultants. B. The above accounts and records of the grantee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the grantee are audited, and may be audited and /or inspected on grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations.designated and authorized by the Council.at any time following reasonable notification during the grant period and for a period of three years following final grant payment. 4. Reports. A. Midpoint Report. Grantee -shall prepare and deliver a midpoint report by letter notifying the Council that the activities undertaken in connection with grant assistance are half completed.., The report shall contain a short.des.crp,tion of the utilization of grant funds remaining funds in the grant-.account and projected future planning expenses, and expected completion dates. -3- B. Funded Portion Completion Report. Upon completion of the funded portion of the work program, the Grantee shall submit to the.Council a funded portion completion report. The Council shall evaluate the report to determine that performance was satisfactory, in that the major tasks to be funded- by.the grant proceeds were completed. The report shall"be of sufficient content and detail to enable the Council to adequately make said evaluation. C. Final Progress Report. The Grantee agrees that upon completion of the total work program, the Grantee will submit to the Council a final progress report which shall be evaluated by the Council to determine that: 1) the planning costs funded by this grant did not exceed 75% of the total cost of the work program; - 2) the scope of work was completed; 3) The terms of this.agreement were met. 5. General Conditions. A. Duration. The period of grant award specified herein shall commence on the execution of this agreement and remain in force and effect until July 1, 1980. At that date, all allocated grant funds which have not been expended or otherwise com- mited by contract, or are not reasonably expected to be paid out in connection with expenses incurred before that date, shall revert to and become a part of the Council's local government assistance fund, and may be reallocated or expended by the Council for planning assistance to other local governmental units in accordance with the Guidelines. B. Rights .Reserved. In the event that the Council finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this agreement,'the Council reserves the right to take any and all such action as it deems necessary or appropriate to protect the Council's interest. C. Changes. The terms of this agreement may.be changed or modified by mutual agreement by the parties hereto. Such changes or modifications shall be effective only upon the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and Grantee. D. The Grantee agrees to comply with all applicable laws relating to non - discrimination, affirmative action, and public purchase, contracting, and employment. -4- In particular., Grantee agrees not to discriminate against any.employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, and to take affirmative action that applicants and employees are treated equally with.respect to the following: employment,.upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment, lay -off, termination, rates of pay,.and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. IN.WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day and year first above written by their authorized representatives. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND ADEQUACY:` Office of Staff Counsel By John Boland, Chairman GRANTEE By Title: 0%ttaq METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Suite 300 Metro Square Building, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 OF • " +-' COMMUNITY GRANT APPLICATION APPENDIX A 1. Name of Community CITY F EDIN 2. Name of Local Contact Person HUGHES Telephone Number 927 -8861 3. Work Program Outline the major tasks and the total cosh of those tasks which must be undertaken in order to prepare or update the community's comprehensive plan according to its systems statement, and prepare and adopt its Official Controls. The outline should follow the format shown on the back of this application form. FILE i0. 1 4. Completion. Date Estimated completion date of the Work Program December I 1979 . 5. Previous Planning Indicate whether this work program reflects the cost of updating a previously prepared plan and, if so, describe to what extent the r plan(s) will be utilized in developing the community's Comprehensive Plan. . The work program will update .existing n xisting plas. Existing plans will be used extensively and will be the basis for comprehensive plan preparation. 6. Outside Assistance List amounts and sources of outside assistance. _ $10,000 Local Funds 7. Special Fund Requests . If the community wishes to apply for a portion of the Special Fund: 0) describe the existing or proposed metropolitan feature or activity that exists within or near your community that increases the total cost to the community of preparing or updating its comprehensive plan relative to other communities; (2) document as best as possible how the feature or activity relates to the funding criteria (V C 3 of the Guidelines) and how it increases your cost; and (3) state the amount requested and indicate where this amount is reflected in the work program major task cost estimates. 8. Grant Amount(s) Requested: a. Community Comprehensive Planning Fund entitlement $ 10,701 b. Inventory Activity Fund entitlement $ c. Special Planning Problems Funds requested $ TOTAL• $ - 10,701 • *Total grant amount requested, plus assistance from the counties out of the County Assistance to Freestanding Growth Centers --A 7r" M thn rntnl rnst of the work orcaram. or the total cost to communit' CITY OF EDINA APPENDIX A..(continued) Work Program Major Tasks: Total Cost of Major Task: 1 Performed by: 2 1. Land Use Plan A. Inventory3 1500 City .of Edina B. Development of . . Policies and Plans: 1. Land Use 3,000 1,000 2. Protection 2,000 3. Housing 100 4. Airport - related considerations 11. Facilities Plan A. Inventory3 1100 B. Development of . Policies and Plans: 1. Transportation 1000 2. Sewer Polity 1000 3: Parks and Open Space Ill. Implementation Program - A. Inventory3 1000 B. Development of Programs or Descriptions: 1. Official Controls 3.000 3000 2. Capital Improvement 2000 3. Housing Implementation 1V, Preparation and Adoption of Official Controls 2000 Total Cost of Work Program- 20,700 Outside Assistance ( -) 0 Cost to Community 20,700 1Includes all costs defined as included in the total cost of the work program. 21-ead person(s), Firm(s) or agency(s) responsible.for the performance of the major tasks of the work program. , If indefinite at present, provide your best estimation and indicate that it is tentative. 3For communities that are eligible for Inventory Activity Grant entitlements, specify 0) the eligible activities to be undertakers. and 12) the cost to the community. • CITY OF EDINA APPENDIX B FUNDED PORTION OF THE WORK PROGRAM List.below the work program major task(s) which will be funded by the total grant award of $10,701.00 If only a portion of a major task is to be funded, list the specific activity(ies) and cost(s).. Mayor Task (s) or Activities to be Funded Cost I. LAND USE PLAN A. Inventory $ 1,500 " B. Development of Policies and Plans 1. Land Use 3,000 2. Protection 1,000 3. Airport 100 II. FACILITIES PLAN A. Inventory 1,100 B.' Development of Policies and Plans 1., - Transportation 1,000 2. Sewer Policy 1,000 3. Parks and Open Space 1,000 III. IMPLEMENTATION A. Inventory 1,000 Total Cost of Funded Tasks, or Activities 10, 701 Less Outside Assistance ( -) Applicable to the Above 0 Remaining Cost $ .of Funded Tasks-and Activities 10,701 *Must be equal to or greater than the total grant award. Estimated completion'date of the above major tasks and activities r - 1 111'. will league of minnesota cities T0: Mayors, Managers and Clerks in Member Cities DATE: January 30, 197$ (Please call to the attention of the council) The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities are joining forces for a mid - session Legislative Conference again this year, and we urge every member city to send at least one representative to the conference and reception for legis- lators on Wednesday, March 1. The afternoon briefing session, beginning at 1:30 p.m., will cover legislative issues that are at that time at a crucial stage of the legislative process. While the actual agenda will depend on legislative developments, it appears at this time that topics may include: • tax increment financing self- insurance • uniform local government election day annexation • phase -out of local police and fire funds From 5:00 until 7:30 p.m., the LMC and AMM are inviting all legislators to be our guests for cocktails, coffee and hors d'oeuvres. This is our opportunity to make face -to -face contact with local legislators and as such it is a very important . part of our lobbying effort. The reception is informally on the agenda of both the majority and minority caucuses in the House and Senate and to date there are no conflicts, so we anticipate a very good turnout. We urge you to be there to contact your legislator personally. The conference this year will be held at the Permanent Collection Gallery of the Minnesota Museum of Art. The address is Kellogg Boulevard and St. Peter Streets, St. Paul -- across from the St. Paul City Hall. (We have enclosed a map.) There is moderate -cost parking nearby at the St. Paul Civic Center Ramp (also shown on the map). The conference fee for .city officials is $10 for any portion of the meeting. The fee is payable with the enclosed registration or at the meeting. Sincerely, Donald A. Slater Executive Director League of Minnesota Cities Vern Pete son Executive Director Association of Metropolitan Municipalities DAS : VP: l j 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 C61 21 222 -2861 [LHI 11 101 " "�IIII'''' league of minnesota cities U 1978 Legislative Action Conference co- sponsored by the League of Minnesota Cities and Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Wednesday, March 1 Permanent Collection Gallery, Minnesota Museum of Art Kellogg Boulevard and St. Peter Streets, St. Paul (across from St. Paul City Hall) 1:30 P.M. to 4:30 P.M. - Briefing session on key legislative issues 5:00 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- p.m. to 7:30 p.m. - Reception for Minnesota Legislators - - - - -- Darlyne M. Lang LEGISLATIVE ACTION CONFERENCE League of Minnesota Cities 480 Cedar Street Wednesday, March 1 St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Please make reservation(s) for for the Legislative city Action Conference.. Enclosed is $ ($10 per person) name (title) The following persons will attend from my city: NAME (Please print or type) TITLE 300 hanover building, 480 cedar street, saint Paul, minnesota 55101 CS 121 222 -2861 Take 1 pn. St-rce7 Ex�T N S ` ° T✓ N `t- sire e r 1 O Th - 1 � 1 c e,vre . tNrER iN � � 1 Y.It.. Ar! ' _ CI v G r,,, � } Cz Alt o , TUa1V121 C�rom TZ F} n4 p Tp Ci U ! e c e AJTe-R_ �I tSeve_ Y�t-k S(X +�— 1) 0 R l,L'ro rN 3s 6 T�kr TQHrA W�COGlrf7 C-- x �9y T-r�KC � ra S-rn EF r e7X r + 1A v� 3 s. i 1480 ia8� a,� �8i� league of minnesota citie -s TO: Mayors, Managers and Clerks in Member Cities DATE: January 30, 1978 ( Please call to the attention of the council) The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities are joining forces for a mid- session Legislative Conference again this year, and we urge every member city to send at least one representative to the conference and reception for legis- lators on Wednesday, March 1. The afternoon briefing session, beginning at 1:30 p.m., will cover legislative issues that are at that time at a crucial stage of the legislative process. While the actual agenda will depend on legislative developments, it appears at.this time that topics may include:` • tax increment financing annexation self- insurance phase -out of local police uniform local government' and fire funds election day From 5:00 until 7:30 p.m., the LMC and AMM are inviting all legislators to be our guests for cocktails, coffee and hors d'oeuvres. This is our opportunity to make face -to -face contact with local legislators and as such it is a very important part of our lobbying effort. The reception is informally on the.agenda of both the majority and minority caucuses in the House and Senate and to date there are no conflicts, so we anticipate a very good turnout. We urge you to be there to contact your legislator personally. The conference this year will be held.at the Permanent Collection Gallery of the Minnesota Museum of Art. The address is Kellogg Boulevard and St. Peter Streets, St. Paul -- across from the St. Paul City Hall. (We have enclosed a map..) There is moderate -cost parking nearby at the St. Paul Civic Center Ramp (also shown on the map ) . The conference fee for city officials is $10 for any portion of the meeting. The. fee is payable with the enclosed registration.or at the meeting. Sincerely, i 011), Donald A. Slater Executive Director League. of Minnesota Cities Vern Pete `son Executive Director Association of Metropolitan Municipalities DAS : VP: l j 300 hanover.building, 480 cedar street, saint "paul. minnesota..:55101 (61.2) 222 -266:1 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: February 2, 1978 Material Description (General Specifications): Air Conditioning Service Contract for City Hall, Public Works Building,. Liquor Stores'(except 50th Street) and Fire Station. Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1, Cool Air $2,844.00 2. Quality Refrigeration $3,283.00 3. Department Recommendation: Having determined that the firm giving the lowest . quotation is responsible, recommend award of contract to Cool Air Mechanical Inc. ignature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is � s not 0 within the amount b d ted for the purchase. . Dal en Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenne Rosland City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: 11ark'Bernhardson VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager. SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000 DATE: February 1, 1978 Material Description .(General Specifications): 4 dr Sedan - City Manager Quotations /Bids: Company j, Bloomington Chrysler - Plymouth 2. Freeway Ford 3. Amount of Quote or Bid $5,022.65 5,125.00 Department Recommendation: Having determined low bidder to be responsible and in accordance with bid award of December1191 1977, r omm d aw rd of bid to Bloomington Chrysler -P1 th � ,I tJ Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsemen The recommended bid is is not within the amount bud eA for the purchase. J. "N. Dalen Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL FOR DEWEY HILL BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as "Dewey Hill ", platted by Laukka & Associates, Inc., and Gordon L. Schuster and Patricia A. Schuster, husband and wife, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of February 6, 1978, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. . ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1978. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 6, 1978, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of February, 1978. City Clerk minnesota department of health 0 717 s.e. delaware st. minneapolis 55440 (612) 296.5221 January 16, 1978 Mr. LeRoy Libby Water Superintendent City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Libby: Enclosed is an analytical data sheet containing information on the bacteriological characteristics of a water sample submitted to the analytical Services Laboratory by the City of Edina Water Department on December 19, 1977. Bacteriological analysis of the sample showed the water to be of satis- factory sanitary quality as evidenced by the fact that organisms of the coliform group were not found. Microscopic examination was negative for iron bacteria. if there are any questions, please contact this Office at 296 -5335. Yours very truly, lit C� L8. Roman J1 Koch Supervising Sanitarian Environmental Field Services Enclosure cc: Edina City Council an equal opportunity employer 1113 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL CA7A City of Edina Report, To Metrovolitan District .cu `y, Etc Sasapiing Point and Source of Sample { Edina, Hennepin Count 4602 Edina Boulevard f 1;,= i_icr, for LaD. ase only. I a Number 6905 p,;,- �nllFcted T ,n; r -tur., of L 12/19/ t ii -d ov °? 701-- M. P V. per 100 mi. m.... ;o c. ❑ Comp. ❑ 2 rra .isms M. F i per 100 ml. Tot d Solids T,:- oieity ,clor To al hardness as ,1Lkalinity as CaC i ro n Maneanese, Chloride Residual Chlorine Sulphate Flu.) ride Total Phosphorus Nttriie Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen Methclene Blue sctive Sub. as ABS Calcium as CaCO3 Sodium POt a S s i um Spec. Cond. µmhos /cm @ 25 OC. nh, a 50 o" Results are in milligrams per liter except as noted. minnesota department of health 717 s.e. delaware st. (612) 296.5221 Mr, LeRoy Libby Water Superintendent City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr, Libby: minneapolis 55440 January 16, 1978 Enclosed is an analytical data sheet containing information on the bacteriological characteristics of a water sample submitted to the Analytical Services Laboratory by the City of Edina Water Department on December 19, 1977. Bacteriological analysis of the sample showed the water to be of satis- factory sanitary quality as evidenced by the fact that organisms of the coliform group were not found. Microscopic examination was negative for iron bacteria. If there are any questions, please contact this Office at 296 -5335. Enclosure cc: Edina City Council I I an equal opportunity employer '3 Yours very truly, Roman J Koch Supervising Sanitarian Environmental Field Services f t f 1 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVI RONMERTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA City of Edina Report To 14etropo agpjing Point and Source Of Sample I Edina. Hennepin County 1_4602 Edina Boulevard 1:.,-; line for Lac. Lse only. ni. 1 (- 1, , urn t, e r 6905 12/19 i:.r,,, t u r,? of 12/19 N. per 100 ml. ro;.p to CO r. P- Comp. 0 MI. F. C Fer 100 ml. Tot+i Solids Turb:ieity Cedar 'Foial hardness as Alk.LlinitV as Cac Manganese Chloride - - - - - - - - - Rp.,idual Chlorine Sulphate . . . . . . . . . . Flu•.,ride 1'•-);a1 Phosphorus Nitrite Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen M,-sthvjene Clue Active Sub. as ABS Calcium as CaCO3 dl IM tas s i um ac. Cond. AimhoslCM @ 25 OC 50 r,,p Results are in milligrams per liter except as noted. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ANALYTICAL DATA City of Edina Report To Metropolitan Distric lawL' CCL Sampling Point and source of Sample id :11y, in County 1 4602 Edina Boulevard 111tc , jur for Laz�. use only. I e Number I 6905 12/19/7 T, u r OF + Lp" i 12/19177 6.1 :form N. per 100 MI. - 00 T.. 0 Comp- ❑ 42,2 F. : . per 100 ml. -- To, ,l "olids Tu r 6 1 d'i t -%-r. I ci r T,),,:a hardness as CIC03 Al.kalinity as CaC01 Mananese Chloride ---------- kc,idu.,ii Chlorine Sulphate ......... Flu,--,ride Total Phosphorus NitriTe, Nitrogen Nitrate Nitrogen Methvlene Blue Active Sub- as ABS Calcium as CaCO3 F.1) t.11 q s I um Spec. Cond. j u mhos1cm @ 25 OC. .h' �' 50 OF ' Results are in milligrams Per liter excePt as noted. minnesota department of health O 717 s.e: delaware st. minneapolis 55440 (612) 296.5221 January 16, 1978 Mr, LeRoy Libby Water Superintendent City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edinas Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Libby: Enclosed is an analytical data sheet containing information on the bacteriological characteristics of a water sample submitted to the Analytical Services Laboratory by the City of Edina Water Department on December 19, 1977. Bacteriological analysis of the sample showed the water to be of satis- factory sanitary quality as evidenced by the fact that organisms of the coliform group were not found. Microscopic examination was negative for iron bacteria. If there are any questions please contact this Office at 296 -5335. Yours very truly, to c . rch t. Roman J Su pervising Sanitarian Environmental Field Services Enclosure cc: Edina City Council i an equal opportunity employer � 1.3 f r r 2/02/78 SUMMARY EXPENDITURE REPORT BY DEPT GENERAL FUND ONLY CITY OF EDINA, MN REQ 76 -110 _ FUND 1,390.00 DEPT- - - - -.. DESCRIPTION - - - - -- -_- 78,175.00 10 LO MAYOR AND COUNCIL 10 - - -12 _PLANNING - -- -- 10 14 ACM,INISTRATION 10 16 FINANCE _ 10._ 18 _- ELECIIGN ---- - - - - -- - 10 20 ASSESSING 10 22 LEGAL ANC COURT SERVICES 10...___... -_._ 24._._. PUBLIC 6OkKS ADMIN. 10 26 ENGINEERING 10 26 PLBLIC hGRKS SUP. E OVERHEAD 10. -_ 30 _.- STkEET DEPARTIIENT____ 10 42 POLICE 10 44 FIRE 844.00 46 _ CIVILIAN DEFENSE ----- - - - - -- 10 47 ANIMAL CGNTROL 10 48 hEALTH --10---49 262,283.90 _INSPECTIONS . ----- - - - - -- 10 50 NON- DEPART14ENTAL 10 51 CENTRAL SERVICES 10 - - - -- 52 - C I T Y HALL - - - - -- 10 54 PUBLIC 6CRKS BUILDING 10 56 EQUIPMENT OPERATION F UND. - -- -- - - - -- - 20 60 PARK ADMINISTRATION - 20___ -_.62 -.- PARK .RECREATION 20 64 PARK MAINTENANCE FUND _6 x943 ,354.00___.-.__ -_ 328,968.45 __._._____6,6I4,385.55 -------------- LSER TOTAL - - - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- - RECORDS_iCTALED PAGE 1 EXPENDITURE APPROP YTD --- _- - - - - -- BALANCE- - - - - -- - -- PERCENT- - - - - -- 23,560.00 1,390.00 22,170.00 -_- 78,175.00 - - - - -- 4,651.45--- - - - - -- 73,523.55 -- 176,741.00 10,329.51 166,411.49 151,246.00 6,698.09 144,547.91 __ -- 35034.00 ----- - - - - -_ . 587.40 --- - - - - -- 34, 746.60 . -. 117,227.00 6,240.80 110,986.20 78,000.00 5713.68 77,421.32 37,424.00 .- .... __- - -._._ __ 5,167.79 __._ -_ _._ -_- 32,256.21 -.. 219,549.00 10,103.34 209,445.66 244,879.00 14,296.78 230,582.22 1., 0 8 0 , 6 82 . 0 0 __- .__ - -_ 30,801.74.__. -. - -- 1,050908J.26 .- 1,413,202.00 73,397.32 19339,804.68 758,751.00 399382.69 715,368.31 -_. 8,419.00 _. - -- .00 __ - -. 8,419.00 -- 23,690.00 844.00 22,846.00 154,645.00 4,222.93 150,422.07 _-. 102t651.00- - - - - -- - - -- 5P591.35 ------- - - - - -- 97, 059.65 - -- 262,749.00 465.10 262,283.90 8319720.00 58,841.77 772,878.23 -_ 589440.00 - - - - - -- 915.05 ____ -_- _ 57, 524.95 - 60,360.00 875.21 59,484.79 397,0,30.00 16,684.56 380,395.44 6,314,724.00 - -- - -- 2929065.56 - -- -- 6,022,658.44 -- 273,145.00 16,114.86 257,030.14 - 87,935.00.__- ._____. -_.__. 5,917.96__.________. -- 62,017.04 267,550.00 14,870.07 252,679.93 628,630.00 36,902.89 591,727.11 6,943,354.00 328,968.45 6,614,385.55 _6 x943 ,354.00___.-.__ -_ 328,968.45 __._._____6,6I4,385.55 5.8 - 5.9 -__ 5.8 4.4 - - 1.6 - - - - -- - 5.3 .7 __13.8 4.6 5.8 - - - -- 2.8 - - - -- - 5.1 5.1 - - -- - •0 - - -- -- - 3.5 2.7 -- ..5.4 - -- - - -- .1 7.0 - - -- -1.5 - - - -- - - - -- 1.4 4.2 5.8 - -6.7 - -- - - - -- 5.5 5.8 4.7 4.7 11 1978. Pr. ecinct C,'.,ucuses D�:te: February 28, 1978 Time: 8:00 P. M. Precinct, Address Independent Republican Ceucnses 1 Shepherd'of Hills Church 500 'Blake =Road 2 Edina City Hall 4801 :West 50th Street 3 Wooddale School 4500 West 50th Street 4 Edinc- Morningsi( Church 4.201.11orningside Road 5 Highlands School 5505 Doncaster Way 6 Courtryside.School 5701 Benton Avenue 7 Normandale Church 6100 Normandale Road .8 Edina East Lower Division 4725 South View Line 9 Concord School 5900 Concord Avenue 10 Creek Valley School 6401 Gleason Road 11 Cahill School 5601 West 70th Street 12 Cornelia School 7000 Cornelia Drive 13 Cornelia School 7000 Cornelia.Drive 14 St. Peter's Church 5421 France Avenue 15 Edina West .Lower "Division 6750 Valley View Road 16 Southdale Area Library 7001 York Avenue 17 Church of the I1Lster 7128 France Avenue 18 Church of the piaster 7128 France-Avenue 19 Chapel Hills Church 6512 Vernon Avenue Democratic. Farmer Labor Caucuses Precincts 1 through 19 Edina West Upper Division. 6754 Valley View Road EXCEPTION PRECINCT 14 St. Peter's Church 5421 France Avenue 11 Mary M. Forsythe District 39A Hennepin County Committees: Appropriations Division on Health, Welfare and Corrections Health and Welfare Labor- Management Relations Rules and Legislative Administration Minnesota House of f= Representatives Martin Olav Sabo, Speaker January 6, 1978, Mrs. Florence C. Hallberg City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Florence: Thank you for the copy of the resolution on Senate File 459. During this past interim I have.been involved.with a committee that has been working on the mandated,`provisions of this bill. As I recently wrote to Mayor VanValkenburg, it.is my judgment that no action will be taken 6n this- matter during the next' year. At that point, it may possibly be reintroduced. It is more likely, I believe, that a community social service act will be considered in place of the present package. It is my understanding that the Senate has no intention of taking any action on the bill as we have it now. If I am mis.taken.on this, and find that the Senate is acting, I will be in touch with you. Sincerely, Mary M.,;Forsy e State Repre tative MMFJamg`;. . Reply to: Minnesota House of Representatives, State Capitol, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 e Telephones: Office (612) 296- 4363;'Home (612) 927 -6613 �Uf' e THINK LIST January, 1975 I. PLANNING COMMISSION A: Smaller zones or classifications B. Posting signs to label rezoning areas C. Halla's property D. Highway 5 and Cahill II. PARK BOARD A. Art Center B. Capital improvement C. Colonial Church D. Monthly financial statements E. Presidents' Council 1. Hockey heaters 2. Hockey bus 3. Insurance III. COMMISSIONS A. Limit tenure B. Rotate chairmanship C. Minutes to chairmen of other commissions D. Staff and secretarial assignments IV. HUMAN RELATIONS A. Liquor B. Youth Action C. Drugs D. South Hennepin Human Services group V. GOVERNMENTAL COMMISSION A. Capital improvements B. Investment procedures C. School cooperation D. Retirement E. Inspection and fees F. Recreation G. Garage H. Consultant I. Insurance analvsis J. When should we meet with Governmental Commission? 1 1 r�� THINK LIST Page Two VI. H.R.A. A. 50th.Street B. Any other areas C. Morningside curb and gutter D. Heritage Preservation Ordinance VII. COUNCIL and MANAGER A. Consolidate mailing, such as- Newsletter, Human Relations, Police B. Meeting brochure. Should this be assigned to League of Women Voters? C. Liquor ads D. Transit committee E. Retirement problems and procedures F. Morningside financing G. Modern Medicine Building H. Consultant arrangements with Woehler and Dahl I. Fellman - Logo J. Housing and Human Relations committee K. Campaign rules L. Crime fund M. Work sessions N. Rotate votes 0. Semi - annual meetings with commissions P. Oral reports from schools and conferences Q. Oral reports from Council members or commission members who attend things, such as Wayne on the old age seminar in Washington and his CATV. R. Earlier budget input by Council S. Open meeting procedures T. Audit questions U. Fire Service 1. Richfield 2. Insurance rates 3. Pension 4. Ordinances V. Public Service Options 1. Transit (already mentioned) 2. Safety committee - obtain some assistance from Safety Council. 3. Federal monies i 4. Energy 5. Awards 6. Foundations 7. Stagger license dates 8. Braemar stadium 9. Bicycle paths 10. Open space and their suggestions and comments 0 a 1 `f F THINK LIST Page Three V. Public Service Options (continued) 11. Beer licenses - the limit.on the distance from school and church is in our proposed ordinance and regardless of the outcome of the liquor question on the ballot should be clarified. 12. We should be making plans for use of the American Legion Building. 13. Traffic - York Avenue 14. Communications, and I am suggesting some sort of a column by department heads, councilmen and the like. 15. Community development funds 16. Votomatic machines 17. Campaign procedures, expenses, and limits LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM Irk First item that we have discussed is .the Deferred Compensation plans . that are available to the school personnef. An employee is given the opportunity of having some of his compensation put into an annuity or some plan to be paid at a later time, such as retirement. Obviously, his money is then taxed to him when he receives it and not when it is put in the fund. This has the obvious tax advantages. Tom Erickson indicates that the present statutes, even though some other municipalities are okaying such plans, is ineffective to include municipal employees. Some of the department heads, in particular, might be concerned with this, and apparently the legislative changes necessary would be minor. I suggest that we endorse such a change and - ask that our legisla ors, work toward th e same. ' The next item is that in connection with the municipal election, we \�` n have now-the situation where in 1976 three of the Trustees and one Mayor will be up for election. The rul &taw %,7.p haav`e adopted is that the two Trustees getting the most votes"-will be el cued f r four years and the one ettin the third amount will be for two years. I think Mat we should get legislative backing to assure that there are no legal entangle- ments with this. - - (ry/�o The Mayor's term is now for two years. Forgetting me, it would be my thought that the Mayor's term should also be for four years, and what y I am suggesting is that again we have some legislation to permit that. I don't know how the legislature works, and they might want to make an ,_,,,�°'1 04 4,exception for the existing incumbent and make it effective from here on. w''""" That's not the point. The point is that I think four years for Mayor and Trustee is probably a more workable situation. give the election clerk the right to pull the absentee card out a person applies for an absentee ballot. That way, we would avoid having the double voting by an absentee who might appear at the poll. A Then, at our last meeting we adopted the legislative program of the Suburban League, and I would suggest that that be sent to our legislators. Then I would suggest that if we feel it worthwhile, it might be wise for' us to determine whether the school has any particular programs or problems � N.° AA' that they want; and with that, we might try to arrange an informal meeting, �. which th e School Board would be open and to the public and to.the press, with the legislators ch rd and the Council. _ f0� JVV /hd /1-14 -75 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, under the leadership of Nancy Bascom, a quilt depicting the history of the City of Edina has been made and donated to the Edina Historical Society; and WHEREAS, the Edina Historical Society has generously loaned the quilt to the City of Edina so that it could be displayed in a prominent place in the Edina City Hall for many residents to see; and WHEREAS, Margaret Swanson, Clare Oie, Pauline Maurer, Betty Paugh, Gretchen Greene, Nancy Aksoy, Francese Whitney, Janet Kjome, Elaine Teeter, Grace Eckmann and Patricia Cox artistically designed this quilt with squares picturing the Grimes House, the Edina Mill, Old Cahill School and the Grange Hall; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby rocognize the outstanding efforts of these ladies who made the quilt and does offer congratulations for the workmanship which they performed; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council expresses its sincere appreciation to the Edina Historical Society for this opportunity to display this Edina Quilt in the Council Chambers of the Edina City Hall where it will receive the recognition it so truly deserves. ADOPTED this 6th day of February, 1978. Mayor