HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-06-20_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 20, 1977
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of June 6, 1977, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of
seconded by
COMMENDATION to Father Louis Forrey - 50 Years a Priest
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Pre-
sentation by Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to
proceed, action by Resolution Ordering Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote t0 pass.
A. Watermain Improvement No. P- WM -314A - Millpond Place
II. REPORTS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING MATTERS* Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of
Zoning Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot
Divisions, Plats, Buildable Lots and Flood Plain Permits require 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass.
A. Colonial Church of Edina - Generally located South of Olinger Blvd., West
of Tracy Ave., and North of the Crosstown Highway.
1. Rezoning from PRD -1 Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned
Residential District (Plan Change) - Z -77 -9 (6/1/77)
2. Preliminary Plat 5 -77 -6 (6/1/77)
3. Flood Plain Permit FP -6 (6/1/77)
B. McCauley Heights 8th Addition - Located'South of McCauley.Lane, North.of
Margaret's Lane and East of County Road 18 (Continued from-16 /6/77)
1. Final Plat. Approval - 5 -77 -7
2. Ordinance No. 801 -A98 - Second Reading - R -1 Residential District to
R -2 Multiple Residential District - Z -77 -10
C. James M. Wilson's First Addition - Located South of W. 54th St. at Zenith
Ave.
1. Preliminary Plat - S -77 -9
D. Russell R. Wilson Subdivision of Lot 6, Prospect Hills First Addition
Located West of Dublin Road and North of Kerry Road
1. Preliminary Plat - 5 -77 -10
E. Edina Interchange 4th Addition - Located West of Ohms Lane and North and
West of W. 74th St.
1. ..Preliminary Plat - S -77 -11
F. Edina Interchange 5th Addition - Located East of Cahill Road and South of
Dewey Hill Road
1. Preliminary Plat.- 5 -77 -12
G. Muir Woods
1. Final Plat
H. Lot -2 Lot Coverage Ordinance Amendment
1. First Reading
I. Ordinance Consolidating Planning Commission and Environmental Quality
First Reading
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION Affidavits of Notice
by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Spectators heard. Ir Council wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Lot 15, Block 1, Lake Edina 3rd Addition
IV. AWARD OF BIDS Tabulation and Recommendation by City Manager. Action of
Council by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to Pass.
A. Insurance (Continued from 6/6/77)
B. Sale of Lots in William Wardwell Lewis Park
C. Watermain Improvement No. 314 -A (Informal Bids)
V. COMMUNICATIONS
A. City of St. Louis Park - Appreciation for Assistance in Fire Fighting
B. Petition
1. Change Hearing Date for Amundson Ave. /Delaney Blvd. Improvements
from 8/1/77 to September, 1977
June 20, 1977, Agenda
Page Two
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 14, 1977
B. Metro Area Assessing Inequities
C. Proposed Moderate income Housing
D. City Hall Parking Lot (Continued from 6/6/77)
E. Police Department Labor Negotiations
F. Boards and Commissions
G. Notice of Claim - Sally Hemmerley
H. Lot 1, Block 1, Lake Edina Village Replat - Terms for Contract for Deed
I. Minnesota Health Department Water Testing Requirements
J. News Letter
K. Dutch Elm Situation
L. State Control on Aquatic Weed Problems
M. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council
N. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
1. Community Health Services Act
a
VII. ORDINANCES First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote if Second
Reading should be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 101 -A1 - Order of Business for Council Meetings
2. Ordinance No. 311 -A9 -- Sanitation and Enclosures for Dogs
VIII. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
IX. FINANCE
A. Testing Equipment - Tri City Lab
B. Claims paid: Motion of , seconded by for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List: General Fund, $78,661.23; Park
Fund, $8,540.44; Park Construction, $7,956.00; Swimming Pool, $1,709.85;
Golf Course, $10,182.20; Recreation Center, $5,278.03; Gun Range Fund,
$111.91; Water Fund, $30,222.03; Sewer Fund, $74,806.70; Liquor Fund,
$195,763.41; Construction, $283,394.96; Total, $696.626.76
•(a —LLI•IL I`I I Mfg 1 v .•• nr i ww�
SCHOOL
�. 01INSta + `
_ I 10 G'• 1F• +I _ )
• .•ate � - !r. � •— �` R •�
'..a.' 61 T ST.
PLA
t su
OL IN"
1
ION >
GA
' • • ... � � � ' - -- III- � T � Tn �� � , ��
r p0 V • C' --_ i t
'\ ....... .. �qH
ST
DINA WEST SENIOR
zor-1H.-nic;
0 <�*
Subdivisi�on
REQUEST NUMBER: Z -77 -9 and S -77 -6
LOCATION: S. of Olinger Bled. and W. of
Tracy Ave.
REQUEST: Replace townhouse plans with
church; PFD -1 to PRD -1 (plan change).
XiUn!!e p innning (i<ivir. linclit yi1117
r� 4r( e�lin�
• 4
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
June 1, 1977
II. Old Business:
2. Rezoning Z -77 -9 Colonial Church of Edina. Generally located south of
Subdivision Olinger Boulevard and west of Tracy "venue. PRD -1 Planned
S -77 -6 & Flood Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Residential
Plain Permit District (Plan Change).
FP -6
Refer to: attached graphics, subdivision dedication
report, and March 30, 1977,.minutes.
Z -77 -9 Concept and final approvals of PRD -1 plans for a church.*
S -77 -6 Platting of one building lot and one park lot.
FP -6 Flood plain permit to fill 20% of the flood plain on this lot.
The Planning Commission reviewed a request by the Colonial Church on March 30,
1977, for a PRD -1 plan change, subdivision, and flood plain permit. At that time,
the Pllanning Commission approved the request with the following stipulations:
A. Final development plans must include:
1. An approved site plan.
2.. Delineation of future parking to accommodate future seating.
• 3. An approved landscaping plan.
B. The rezoning is contingent upon completion of final plat and flood plain per-
mit.
C. Submission of an approved developer's agreement and parkland dedication prior
to final plat approval.
D. A combination of Lot 1 and 2 into one lot prior to final plat approval.
..On April 18, 1977, the City Council reviewed the proposed plans for the
Colonial Church. The Council agreed that a church would be a proper land use in
this location. The Council, however, referred the matter back to the Planning
Commission and advised the church to modify its site plan with regard to the pro -
posed parking lot, the height_ of the berm surrounding the parking lot, and to
final the landscaping plan in detail.
Since that time, the church has held meetings with neighbors in the vicinity
of the proposed church and has prepared revised plana which include those items men-
tioned by the Council on April 18, 1977. These plans, as submitted, meet all
ordinance requirements for final plan approval. The proposed revisions to the
plat. include:
1. AOncreased height of the berm surrounding the parking lot and also an exten-
side of the berm easterly and westerly.
2. Additional landscaping on the berm and also surrounding the church for screcn-
Ing purposes.
PC Staff Report - Colonial Church
June 1, 1977
Page 2
3. An enlarged pond size and an extension of the pond along the western side of
the church.
4. The delineation of a future expansion of parking area.
The church has also revised their proposed subdivision in .accordance with
the recommendation of the Planning Commission by consolidating two lots into one
lot. The church also proposes to dedicate Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed plat
to the City for parkland dedication purposes.
Recominerdatio:i: It is apparent the church has attempted to provide the modifi-
cations to the site plan as was requested by the Council on April 18. These modi-
fications result in additional screening and landscaping in order to provide a
more desirable land use at this location. Staff thus recommends approval of the
requested rezoning, subdivision, and flood plain permit with the following stipula-
tions:
1. Future parking as delineated on Lot 1; Block 1, should be expanded to accom-
modate at least 100 spaces.
2. Rezoning is contingent on completion of final plat and the flood plain permit.
3. Submission of an approved developer's agreement and deed to Lot 1, Block 1,
prior to final plat approval.
.GH: nr
5 -25 -77
Subdivision No. -<'
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
S
j�
SUBDIVISION NA4E: •-�(_C�G(J�'l k- /0-ff
�� •rrr c�j ��.sa� ra.. -
LAND SIZE: , 4 4 (ac LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: )
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
BO. dedicate % of the land 2 •���
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of. applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
• land dedicated)
If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
0 If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4O. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
S. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
2.
_ni
8. - Rezoning.Z -77 -9
Subdivision
5 -77 -6 & Flood
Plain Permit
FP -6
Colonial Church.of.Edina. Gene ;ally located south of
Olinger Boulevard and west of Tfacy Avenue. PRD -1
Planned Residential - District to PRD -1 Planned Residential
District (Flar. Change) .
Mr. Luce said the request is essentially a plan modification. The site is
presently zoned for townhouse development (rezoned several years ago when Pemtom
owned the property). The proponent received preliminary rezoning approval two
years ago for a church but did not request final approval in time allowed by the
ordinance, so they are now back.again with essentially the same plans to repeat the
process and-.gain concept approval once again for the Colonial Church development
plans. Mr. Luce recommended approval of the requested rezoning, subdivision,
. and flood plain permit with the following stipulations:
A. The final development plans must include:
1. An improved site plan identifying and clarifying proposed grades and
dimensions.
2. Delineation of future parking to accommodate future seating.
3. An improved landscaping plan illustrating landscape materials in an
appropriate quantity and scale for the site and buildings, surface treat-
ment of the entire parcel, and screening of parking and loading areas.
B. The rezoning is contingent upon completion of the final plat and the flood plain
permit.
C .'' Submission of an approved Developer's Agreement and parkland dedication prior
to approval of the final plat.
.D. The combination of Lots 1. and 2 into one lot prior to approval of the final
plat.
Mr. Craia Hinrichs of Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, architects for the church,
presented slides illustrating the church design and construction.. Mr. Jim Goulet,
also of Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, showed. graphics illustrating the drainage
plans for the church. He said there would be two accesses to the church to allow
for less concentrated txaffic in one single area.
Mr. Luce said the parking lot is designed to accommodate 220 cars with 20
additional spaces near the loading entrance. The meeting hall is designed to seat
650 people on the main floor with future expansion in. the balcony to accommodate
1000 people total. The proposed meeting hall with "have a 60 foot height at
the ridge line and the bell tower would be 120 feet.
Mr. and Mrs. J. Evensrud, 5820 Olinger Boulevard, were present to indicate
their objection to the proposal.
Mr. Runyan moved for approval of the requests with the stipulations as stated
in the staff report and listed by Mr. Luce, and Mrs. McClelland seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
C1111ECIi I11'.1' 111 ? ::1 1 L1!11NA1fl 1'I.. \I AI ►'Ktr�A�. Ar:�► r�tnru r r.nrt�.;
-:n, 11 ;,ION rn.i 11,Nc_ ii_itr:l: I. 1979. .Affidavits of
N,)LjC • were prL%;1•1ltCd h)' rlCtinl,.Clr•r:., :►pprovc•d ;►:; to form and ordered placed on -
fi1(�. Mr. Luce. presented the rerluetit of Colonial Church of Edina, generally
JOC.lLcd south of Oliny;er loulevard and west of Tracy Avenue, for rezoning from
PRI) -1 Planned Residential Ulstrict to I'[:1) -1 Planned Residential District (Plan
P i Change), preliminary plat approval and flood plain permit. lie recalled that a
/ (O previous rezoning request was granted concept approval in 1975, but that the
mandatory one -year time limit for submitting final development plans, according
to City Ordinances, has expired. Current plans for construction of the church
^ are similar to the 1975 plans with modification to improve flood water storage.
Ly The average elevation of the parking lot will be lowered 5' and moved north 19',
slightly reducing the berm in the northwest corner of the site.. The -berm on the
Rest side has also been.reduced allowing greater exposure of the parking and
loading entrance to the adjacent residences. The parking lot is designed to
accomodate 220 cars with 20 additional spaces near the loading entrance. The
meeting hall is designed to seat 650 people on the main floor with future expan-
sion in the °balcony to'- 1000 °people The-proposed have=s =Luce
height at the ridge line and the bell tower will be 120' at the peak. Mr. Luce
stated that the staff, the Planning Commission and the Environmental Quality.
Commission recommended approval with the following stipulations:
A) The final development plans include:
1) An improved site plan identifying and clarifying proposed grades and
dimensions.
2) Delineation of future parking to accommodate future seating.
3) Ar_ improved landscaping plan illustrating landscape materials in an
appropriate quantity and scale for the site and buildings, surface treat-
ment of the entire parcel, and screening of parking and loading areas..
B) The,rezoning is contingent upon completion of the final plat and the flood
plain permit.
C) Submission of an approved Developer's Agreement and parkland dedication prior
to approval of the final plat. -
Mr. Larry Laukka, Chairman of the Colonial Church Building Committee, briefly re-
viewed the history of the church construction plans and presented graphics including
the site plan, architecture, perspectives and landscaping. He stated that they had
considered the nature of the community in their planning and if given preliminary
approval, would again contact people living on Olinger Boulevard and in Nine Mile
Village to present final plans for grading, lighting and landscaping. Mr. Jack
Herbst, 5E24 Olinger Boulevard, presented the following petition signed by all
but two property owners living in Nine Mile Village and on Olinger Boulevard and
Tracy Avenue: "The undersigned are requesting the Edina City Council and Edina
Planning Commission not to rezone the property with boundary south of Olinger
Boulevard, east of Village Nine condominums, north of Crosstown Highway 62, West
of Tracy Avenue, for the construction of the Colonial Church of Edina. We request,
as residents and taxpayers, that the property remain zoned as is or for family
residences only. We also request. -that the plat not be divided or used for any
otber.purpose than family residences both now and in the future." Mr. Herbst
questioned whether proper procedure had been followed in,erecting the sign on pro-
posed property to be rezoned. Mr. Erickson responded that the ordinance provides
that failure to fully comply with the provisions relating to such. sign shall not
prevent the Planning Commission and the City Council from acting on such request.
Mr. Herbst also expressed the concern of the residents on Olinger Boulevard and Tracy
Avenue with regard to the volume of traffic using those streets on Sunday mornings
and the hazard resulting from such traffic to children and adults using nearby
recreation areas. Mrs. Rosanne Michaels, Nine Mile Village, inquired about a second
parking lot on the original plan. Mr. Laukka responded that only one parking lot had
ever been planned, but there was an area provided for staff parking. Mrs. Phyllis
Severseike, Nine Mile Village; Mr. Roger Uhr, 5812 Olinger Boulevard; Mr. Chris Koegel,
5816 Olinger Boulevard, and Mr. John Ryden, 5804 Olinger Boulevard, expressed oppo-
sition to the proposed church construction. Mr. Gary Holmes, Nine Mile Village, stated
he was not 'opposed to the church, but was concerned that the scale of the buildings was
out of proportion with the neighborhood. Mr. Jerry Dockendorf, Nine Mile Village,
questioned whether the parking lot could be located nearer the park on the southeast j
part of the site. In response to a question by Mr. Shaw regarding energy use for the
type of proposed construction, Mr. Laukka stated the buildings would. be well insu-
lated and would meet the State criteria for energy use. After lengthy discussion,
Councilman Richards moved that the.matter •beareferred back to the Planning Commission
meeting of June 1, 1977, so that adequate notice can be posted and to provide tl►e
necessary time to modify the site plans with regard to the proposed parking lot and
lighting thereof, the grading of the berm on the north and west sines and to 'finalize
the landscaping in detail, and that he was offering the motion from the position
that the Council is agreed on the concept that.the church development would be a
proper use of that area. Plotion was seconded by Councilman Shaw.
Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
• - - -- - ""CC�� �/+ .,.mil.
,-
...'.� � o _ � r- :...._ - errlll���' -' � �� •'�i�t� �' f'�X : tl'11 .II
• _`- ... � ( lii�'; ��•r�1 /l�l ,;. �r`, , 1:���1 y r, ' 11 1 .', i�11 `� i�� I
-\ � 7,,��;r��,arl����n,•,rl .sl' � Hj` 1 �'.� .•It 111. t r� I
�.�� � �, w. �� /,,�! ��% ,. •• ���11 111�,� >w1, ,Ill.•?
I�� Cam• � :� ( .�� \:' �� -
•. 1 ``; I \ i r''�'�lt ! �Ii = ��1�1�I�4 r'll�l��i� \ \ � _ � � —
�, '' � � -�`i i' ' i i ! 1 l l l l f l `I 11►.,y l l l l_I'1 ` c ;r`. - - - _
+\
. of I 4 { s I f � / t /• i j ;� _ _ 3. e�v'k)O'�
• - ►•
it 8 b 9 — -� - ,RAC`( 4Vkti�ff ° !2!1
y r �� —� r. •�1 �— 5 E � � c c �
1 .+.w.•nrnr OLINOER BOULEVARD - a
�• a f• r .
PRELIMINARY PLAT OF w
i I COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA FIRST ADDITION i
ara � r
• . �� e ° -. , c «..r .r .,ran..« ..,ra.., . «,.. «r.rr.r .r... ,n.. «a r...r:;�..rx a
a : r 8 ii a e 1 : r r.,� •• : «u.rr ...`� ra .,.
v
V °t t •y n `w.�ln..( ..aw�« er e..n.... - ....•rte. u,.
• . _ _ _ �
! :i w: o:�.s: .::ap° :.�e `wa. n: ':°e r!i_ r.....• ..: :. :� °.'r,�.w
°..x.t..r «a« ....... ro. rw
i O � ° «r � r ails .of mumar m�..r arw •r mtr. umr rxsi
"y S
e
WAY
�s
"/� 9
/ / E a
4 � V
gv.Yt u4•,t,rYr
6 -1 -77 Planning Commission Minutes, page 2
2. Rezoning Colonial Church of Edina. Generally located south of
Z -77 -9 Olinger Bouelvard and west of Tracy Avenue. PRD -1
Subdivision Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Residential
S -77 -6 & Flood District (Plan Change). (continued from 3- 30 -77)
Plain Permit
FP -6
Mr. Hughes recalled that on March 30, 1977, .the Planning Commission had
reviewed -the pr "eliminary- rezoning and` subdivision plans °'for ftie'Colon al 'Church- site
located at Olinger Boulevard and west of Countryside Park and Fire Station. At
that time, he said, staff had recommended preliminary approval of the requests
for PRD -1 zoning and subdivision and for a flood plain permit. Approval, however,
was contingent on the following:
A. The final development plans include:
1. An improved site plan identifying and clarifying proposed grades and dimen-
sions.
2. Delineastion of future parking to accommodate future seating.
3. An improved landscaping plan illustrating landscape materials in an appro-
priate quantity and scale for the site and buildings., surface treatment of
the entire parcel, and screening of parking and loading areas.
B. The rezoning is contingent upon completion of the.final plat and the flood plain
permit.
C. Submission of an approved Developer's Agreement and parkland dedication prior
to approval of the final plat.
Mr. G. Hughes recalled that on April 18, 1977,_the City Council reviewed
the proposed plans .for Colonial Church and, following considerable discussion, agreed
that the church was, in fact, a proper use for that particular site. The City
Council did, however, advise the church to revise their plans with regard to the
proposed parking lot, the height of the berm surrounding the parking lot, to final
the landscaping.plan in detail, and to meet with neighborhood groups in order to
check into the advisability of increasing the height_ of the berm surrounding the
parking lot. Mr. Hughes said that, in staff's opinion, the plans submitted by
the-proponent do meet all ordinance requirements for final overall development plans;
therefore, staff would recornmend approval of the requested rezoning, subdivision,
and flood plain permit with the same stipulations:as stated in the March.30, 1977,
staff report.
Mr. Larry Laukka of the Building Committee for the Colonial Church of Edina
said they have worked with the residents in the Tracy - Olinger area and are, at
this standpoint, asking to proceed with.final plan approval to allow them to begin
construction. He indicated they had revised the screening and landscaping plans
and have presented these plans to the residents. Most importantly, he believed
they attempted to accomodate berm and screening processes to accomplish what they
could on that site in terms of screening the parking lot from residents' view.
Mr. Jack Herbst, 5824 Olinger Boulevard, said the Colonial Church had ori-
ginally had communication problems with the residents. However, communication
6 -1 -77 Planning Commission Minutes, page 3
is now very good and the residents are satisfied as far as screening and berming
are concerned. He said, however, there were still traffic problems due to the
park and height problems bf the church. He felt if a one -way street were created,
as well as no parking along Olinger Boulevard up to -the park, that the traffic
problem would be partially solved.
In response to Mr. Herbst and Mr. Burt Larson, Mr. Laukke said the church
was placed in this location as the result of three years of study because it.was
Pp Pr - - ,- . - — - •-- _ � are - - into _ - -��
considered -the mosE a ro riate-- 'si`te1with� both noise and -site area taken into
account.
Mr. Dick Hammel, of Hammel- Green - Abrahamson noted they had determined
that other sites. did not comply with the basic off - street parking. He further
noted that with the proposed plan, the parking .would be adequately screened
from residents and the outside lighting would be. indirect in the parking area.
Mr. Herbst was concerned about the church height and indicated that it
was the equivalent of an 11 =story building. Mr. Laukka said the height was not
out of character with the area and the substantial portion of the church would be
only two stories.
In response to Mrs. McDonald, Mr. Laukka said they had met with Ken Rosland,
the Park and Recreation Director, Bob Dunn, the City Engineer, and Planning staff
regarding the parkland dedication and the parking lot expansion into the property
dedicated to the City. He said Mr. Rosland had indicated that he was going to
recommend at the June Park Board meeting that Colonial Church be allowed to
expand the parking lot immediately, in view of future parking needs, unto the
parkland dedicated to the City. This would relieve some parking pressure on
Olinger toulevard. Mr. J. Evenrud, 5820 Olinger Boulevard, felt no parking on
Olinger Boulevard would be an adequate solution to the traffic problem but that
the church would be too tall. Mrs. McClelland indicated the proposed church
was greater than that allowed in the R -1 zone. Mr. G. Hughes clarified that the
proponent was requesting a PRD -1 zoning rather than a R -1 zoning.
Following lengthy discussion, Mr. Runyan moved for final approval of the
proposed subdivision, rezoning, and flood plain permit requests for the reasons
as stated in the staff report and also recommended their be an effort made between
the church and the Park Department to expand future parking unto City property.
Mr. C. Johnson seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
3. Declaration of Buildable Lot - Outlot 1, Iroquois Hills 4th Addition.
Generally located south and west of Valley View Road and east of County
Road 18. (continued from 4- 19 -77)
Mr. G. Hughes indicated the proponent has asked _for additional time to
pursue other plans. He has, therefore asked the request be tabled indefinitely.
Mr. Kremer moved the request for declaration of a buildable lot be tabled in-
definitely. Mr. S. Hughes seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
4. Subdivision
Wallace
B. Kenneth. Generally
located east of Lincoln.
S -77 -2 and
Drive
and west of Malibu Drive
extended. R -4 Multiple
Rezoning
Family
Residential District and
R -1 Single Family Resi-
Z-77-4 and
dential
District to R -4 and R -2
Multiple Family Resi-
F1ood Plain _
__ dential
Districts and R -1 Single'Family
Residential Dis-
Permit
trict.
Revised subdivision and
rezoning.
.:' • ; .� ..� . ���� SCHOOL
y. O L LN
n
C Vii:
OLI�:GER
BLVO.
PARK''
L
V.
<•
.o z�
DINA WEST SENIOR �.
zoniincs
• V s o
subdivisilk-i I I
REQUEST NUMBER: Z -77 -9 and S -77 -6
LOCATION: S. of Olinger Blvd. and W. of
Tracy Ave.
REQUEST: Replace townhouse plans with
church; PFD -1 to PRD -1 (plan change).
0
A
village planning department village g►f edins
Sim
n
C Vii:
OLI�:GER
BLVO.
PARK''
L
V.
<•
.o z�
DINA WEST SENIOR �.
zoniincs
• V s o
subdivisilk-i I I
REQUEST NUMBER: Z -77 -9 and S -77 -6
LOCATION: S. of Olinger Blvd. and W. of
Tracy Ave.
REQUEST: Replace townhouse plans with
church; PFD -1 to PRD -1 (plan change).
0
A
village planning department village g►f edins
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF., REPORT
March 30, 1977
II.- New,Business:
_
S. Rezoning Z 77 -9 Colonial Church.of,,Edina. Generally located
y _
Subdivision -- -
south of Olinger Boulevard and - west.- of - =Trac
5 -77 -6 6 Flood Avenue. PRD -1 Planned Residential District to
Plain Permit PRD -1 Planned Residential District (Plan Change).
FP -6
Refer to: attached graphics. Subdivision Dedication
Report, EQC staff report, and Z -75 -2
staff report and minutes.
.Z -77 -9 Concept approval of PRD-1 plans for a church.
5 -77 -6 Platting of one building lot and one park lot.
FP -6 Flood plain permit to fill 20% of the flood plain on this lot:
The Colonial Church is renewing their efforts to rezone the former
Pemtom townhouse property to allow construction of a church. The plans
have retained the original road alignment, park and ponding configurations
that were designed for the 72 unit tot:rnhouse 'project.
A previous rezoning request was granted concept approval in 1975. However,
this approval. is no longer valid because a- mandatory ,one -year time limit has
expired. The organization of the current plans is similar to the 1975 plans
with modification to improve flood water storage. The average elevation of
the parking lot will be lowered five feet and moved north 19 feet, slightly
reducing the massive berm in the northwest corner -of the site. The berming
f the parking
on the west side has also been reduced allowing_ greater exposure o
and loading entrance to the adjacent residences. The parking lot is designed
to accommodate 220 cars with 20 additional spaces near the loading entrance.
.The meeting hall is designed to seat 650 people on the main floor with future
expansion in the. balcony to 1000 people.. The proposed meeting hall will have
a 60 foot height at the ridge line. The, bell: tower will be 120 feet at the
peak rivaling the tallest structures in the city.
Recommendation: The general site conditions and proposed design have not
changed significantly since 1976 and therefore the staff recommends approval
of the three. requests with the following stipulations:
A. The final development plans include:
1. An improved site plan identifying and clarifying proposed grades and
dimensions.
2. Delineation of future parking to accommodate future- seating.
3. An improved landscaping plan illustrating landscape materials in an
appropriate quantity and scale for the site and buildings, surface
treatment of the entire parcel, and screening of parking and loading
areas
B. The rezoning is contingent upon completion of the final plat and the flood
plain permit.
C. Submission of an approved Developer's Agreement and parkland dedication prior
to approval of the final plat.
HS:nr
3 -25 -77
EDINA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
March 28, 1977
.Colonial Church of Edina - PRD -1 Change in Development Plans and Flood
Plain Permit
Refer to: attached graphics
Approximately two years ago, the EQC reviewed a' preliminary rezoning request
by the Colonial Church of Edina for a tract of land located north of the
Crosstown Highway and west of the Edina Fire Department and Countryside
Park. At that time, the EQC and Planning Commission recommended approval
of the proposed rezoning and the City Council subsequently granted preliminary
approval. According to City Ordinances, final development plans must be
submitted within one year following preliminary approval in order to receive
final rezoning. The Colonial Church, however, did not submit such plans.
Thus, preliminary plans must be resubmitted at this time and the process
repeated.
The proposed plans.submitted at this time are essentially identical to those
submitted two years ago. In that a portion of the site lies within the flood
plain of Nine Mile Creek (el. 856), a flood plain permit is also requested.
As shown on the attached graphic, the church proposes to fill about one -
fourth of the pond on the site for the purpose of locating the structure.
This pond was constructed several years ago by Pemtom,.Inc., the previous
owners of the property. In addition, most of the hill located on the
northerly portion of the site would be leveled for a parking lot. A berm
would be constructed on the north and west sides of the parking lot for
screening purposes.
From a flood plain standpoint, some encroachment is proposed in order to
construct the church structure. This is offset by constructing the parking
lot below the floodplain elevation. Net flood plain encroachment is computed
to be 18.5 %. The Nine ,file Creek Watershed District has reviewed the proposed
encroachment and finds it to conform with its objectives and has thus issued
a grading permit for the project.
The drainage plan for the site would utilize the ponding areas on the site
for storage. These ponds would also serve as settling basins during construc-
tion. In addition, a hay bale dike at the outlet of these ponds would be
constructed during construction to prevent sediments from entering Nine Mile
Creek.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the proposed project and flood plain permit in
that: -
1. Flood plain encroachment is within accepted standards.
2. Erosion control measures shown on the plans are adequate.
3. The ponds on the site are properly used for storm water storage.
4. The proposed development is essentially identical to that previously
approved.
GLH:nr
3 -25 -77
Subdivision: No.
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE:- Z r C@G LAND VALUE:.
(By: Date :
)
The developer of this subdivision ha, s been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land,.
B. dedicate % of the land Z •J��'
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
• As a result of-applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity maybe used. for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
If property is adjacent to an existing park and the
addition
beneficially expands the park.
OIf property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre
park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4�. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
5. If the property is.aL place of significant. natural, scenic or his -
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In.all other instances than above.
2.
OLINGER BIND
ICI
77.
a. 0
V-Q
1 41. or r
C--3
el
4M
a
pf
T
0 2 It
SITE PLAN
'I is
TRACN' AVE
1 - -
" G fit'. � � •, •• .. .:� r ,. ;� • '•:�. - .'. ',•. -� ' r� ,:_:. '::
•` •Ir . -awr.. g..•� „K,,,. .y;..:; x^n.,,,....: _fin ..•.i •. .. . ��•• %� i•' /' '/ . i' .. ii 'rJ rV4 1 .o
' staff:
' • - -� ... .. _ ' :; :; J I I I I . j' ,�.. fit'. a, .. . •,
I... _�,I • nal.ri star IJic -- inartlx:e 1r—i�
^' .� ...---1 .,i -y� ;I j I i ice-' - •1 .I... '�, 'r'
• _..��� .. � -;+ —it 1v' Ilrin•> I I 1 I I.•. ,. ;1'J ,
fir! • .. __ T- '�_” ':i'•' � . * .. L--' -- --_ - - °_ _ . ! � • • - .
I ki(illi it star ."'.. mrrtin} F, xlH ±: ; t�,`,.,. , • .
- —.-- -� --
great Icdl- uf-jx•rul:lcatinn!• • - f • tlf .. \
�- ._ ' 1 •.. _ - ••4....._ � :!ter +..Y. •. Y _- 1 r- .. i1 •
toddler - --multi- useF'In— 4 -
Ir
n In '71 1: 0 .
BUILDING FLOOR PLAN .
I '1
..n
t� J I Imo! I`..y �• I _ .� ly L ' J lnf 'i _
1 "I �t _
nnrnrn
EAST ELEVATION ���
101
- -
ICI II
-I I-,-
I
�,,,•.•'Rr""�r��""...�.�. • I�-�!,1...11.��1!.._r... ...,. _._.,. � ''_.I .y � - T�..•�- •..- •- .arn...v.- '�"R -�'- Y_.- .' --r,. �' 1. � - ._.. ,r-.. _ --�.� �~ - - -
- i. 10E" 1' INGEIUUSF . SECTION I(X)KIT\GNOIZfII -�I MEETINGIIOUSI :SliCl70 \'LUUKING�VIiST
� -- � i• l=- -- . - -� fir, I(� II'I C I �' i ,
_ ..
IL
� �1� � � � ; ,�- �; • ' .. I I� I III hr � � _ _ �� �� �� � .
lu
I�
' 11fL"1'll\C 1ItxISI: PLAN Ar mitsf fLUUIt ��� MEETING I IOUSI: ITAN AT BALCONY . F= =21 =
• -- n.��.'�' ..r .� -i •�•�... ,..r. -.e. 1..�,.,,,,,_.. —._. �- .•..�. ,rr. I.•.•:'w cT r,••w R. : -' - 'r"A+T►r•'.n'�v.•'�.+t! -+rte ..
>'�rui.rt�:u. >" - ... .��Z - .. . iy.•r:.L�_........�..��.'��.�.. a.�>....r.. ,.� ..s .. ...�..... -.: 1.. ai... �1a:+.: wL�. ai..• a�,:.+ s, r ..tir+..i..le�.+.�:J....e.r.r�:: .. �.u...i.r � -"_"� - -
a.•rra -
LONGITUDINAL SECTION AT PARLOR r-- TRANSVERSE SECTION AT PARLOR "- -=9
21 21
., , —mss .. -- - -- - - - - -- -
..�, 1 -•jam -- —� - - -. -. __... _ F+ I r.! - - - _
—
• -tr1l �rl- ,��Il�n�"� ti• I :',.1__. 1 1._ 1 1,��J� � A•�' � i I � rt� � �� 1 1 1 _
-- _ l•�.`., j..R _ ,......, I'w0 -- T'rr._cq++.^eS•'- ;IRi7Ty'�' Te'-'o[„r.., ",�.-C�1w^ 1 , . , "RTa'A'PI'�trf.'fT�°
.'(.i ... ... .. ., •. .J _> �'. uwn. �. f. w•..r�.rrr>4:.d_��w�.`.,r4.•_r. w.... ..r r. ..., .. ....: .._.. � ,.. • r r.A.r•i.�..,d,��u ✓.ar.�+>..•�L4aJi1rr�1�"
l IEFTIN'G I101A : SECTION 100KING SCXI•I.11 F", =9 MEETING I IOUSf', SECTION 100KING EAST F �
�, 21 TI
..i ...- ... __.. _ i era,•, 1.. Iltlin r v�1,;n --- -T —__ � � ... __._... ` � _ � '
• �' r.../ —j\ '� �`i���liu -, IMn 110 PO1\OJ p , / /
1 '1 yY r ii. .. . �• _ a
(� POND COVN . R% YSIDE PfiRK
�. �. I � PLAMIN6 SCNEOIRC
p' �•, t
fie
Ir
of
POND
ot
• ti - i r' % : 1. / �� � \ �
. •� •, •' •• :,,•. •� , i I'.I .. ra anon O n`,,. i
�- ,-� ...... :...•' EI 11.11 1 �( '� '�•�,• � Vii' sue'..' /�/ n . ..� ..,. n+n.•`can .r.: a.., I
�_ ����� _ ... . � 1 � �J' j r ' �' / � ... ee .,11• J � ^. rY 1f Nl.V,. ' / / / / //. Ian... ,• p /4vf� 1
`T— '� � � • w.�lC"1. 1 nn1[: IS %TP iLGOD PLA.R OoVNDl1 , tee• fa.,..e Ntl ^
• � -- OM �A' /1'I'.1: rn•, .111 CD PLAIN AtlYNpRY 1 �-�• n •a••••; p,,. ealrp .
—
CROSST ..' ...•... ^.t.,. � .. ..•..,... rcZ Pa. ucrwY wlrlllN owe � ....� a..> ...r
~ pWK p _f � _ � —Ir— .\ e•Ir.rin>. arw•`•MEpi 1 ^. •' °"'Ii.• O 4.. ...w wn •
GZ coal wa ew,.�nw.a -I•- � 1 u•. v.. ICwr.n [� �,1
�_ Z•LwwIL R I7 ._' � I, �rPT_., Pp•IFStrO at•.w•a 'nlMRwe • 1..:..•f. Mt if trl.e ,f. n n.�nf.
' `.�. �_ ..•. TrO.p 4 SwR.
'GL:, In
5/28/75
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
April 30, 1975
Z -75 -2 Colonial Church of Edina. Generally located north of the Crosstown
Highway, south of Olinger Blvd., east of Bredesen Park and village 9,
and west of Countryside Park and the Edina Fire Station on Tracy.
Avenue.
Refer to: Enclosed site plan.
r
Request: PRD -2 Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned
Residential District.
The Colonial Church of Edina has taken an option on the property shown on the
attached location map.. Prior.to their taking this
against such action. It was our feeling. at that time that it would be very
difficult to place an institutional buiding in so large an area and have it fit
in well with the neighborhood.
The staff also was concerned that Village Nine,
the adjacent townhouse project, and the people who have purchased those townhouses,
placed considerable confidence in the Pemtom.plan (the former owner). This
confidence included changes in the physical setting, such as landscaping, p ondinq
and borders, and storm sewer, etc. etc. Another concern regarding the subject was
that there would be significant inflows and outflows of traffic during non-
residential peaks, and there would be a need to have a large parking lot to
serve the Sunday morning assembly. Neither the parking lot nor the.traffi.c
flow i'*s consistent with the adjacent single family residential areas.
the planning and environmental staff felt
From an environmental standpoint,
that placing a large structure and parking lot on this site may degradate the
topography and require filling beyond the extent needed for townhouses. The
has taken an option on the site and
Colonial Church, as was mentioned, however,
has tried to adjust their development plan to the concerns expressed by the staff.
They have proposed a sloped -roof church building, they have tried to maintain a
"campus" quality to the development, and they have tried to depress the parking
lot behind berms. In order to accomplish these things, they have unfortunately
had to fill in a considerable amount of flood plain and remove the majority of a
large hill presently existing on the north part of the site. Another adverse effect
is the traffic egress, which comes directly onto Olinger Blvd., a single family
residential street. it should be noted, however, that the street has been
designated and designed to handle considerable amounts of traffic.
Recommendation: The western Edina Plan, as well as the existing zoning, indicate
that the highest and best use for this site is townhcuses. It is also the staff's
opinion that the highest and best zoning on this site is townhouses. The church
people have argued that it isn't feasible to develop this site with townhouses and
therefore their proposal is the next most reasonable alternative.
The greatest difficulty is that the homeowners, both across Olinger from this site
and the to%�nhouse owners immediately adjacent to`the west of this site, acquired
their properties depenJont on tbo fulfillment of Pemtom's zoning plans. The stiff
is therefore very reluctant .to. recommend approval. of a land use which it con ;idcrs
second best and which the neighboring residents my. or may not find acceptable and
compatible.
EDINA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
April 28, 1975
Colonial Church of Edina. Generally located north of the Crosstown Highway,
south of Olinger.Blvd., east of Bredesen Park and West of Countryside
Park. PRD -2 Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Residential
District.
Refer to: Attached graphics.
The Colonial Church of Edina is requesting a rezoning to PRD -1 for the above
referenced property for the purpose of constructing a church. This property
was rezoned to PRD -2 in 1970 by the Pemtom Corporation. At that time a 72
unit townhouse project was approved.
As shown on the attached graphic, the developer proposes to fill about one -
fourth of the pond on the site for the purpose of locating the structure.
Most of the hill on the northerly portion of the property would be leveled
for a parking lot.
The drainage plan for the site would utilize the ponding areas for storage
and settling basins. Surface water would eventually drain to Nine Mile Creek.
The floodplain profile for Nine Mile Creek indicates a floodplain elevation
of 956 in this area. According to this, most of the church and a portion of
the parking lot encroach into the floodplain.
Recommendation: The developer was requested to consult with Barr Engineering
Company, engineers for the watershed district, concerning the floodplain
problem on the property. The developer indicated on April 24th, 1975, that
he met with representatives of Barr Engineering and was preparing revisions
to the plan to alleviate the floodplain problems. These revisions will
apparently be available on Monday, April 28th, and will be submitted to the
EOC at the Monday night meeting. I will prepare.-a recommendation regarding
the proposal on Monday after reviewing the revisions.
GH:In
5/25/75
i
COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA ZONING RF.OUEST CONTINUED TO JUNE 2 1975. Affidavits of
4 Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on.file.
Mr. Luce presented the request of Colonial Church of Edina for a zoning change from
PRD-2 Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Residential District for property gen-
erally located North of the Crosstown Highway, South of Olinger Blvd., East of
Bredesen Park and Village 9 and West of Countryside Park and the Edina Fire Station.
Mr. Luce recalled that the staff had recommended that town houses were the highest
and best use for the property but that the Planning Commission had recommended in
favor of Colonial Church as being a reasonable use for the property. Mr. Hyde
said that it might be that a portion of this twenty -five acre site might have to
�0 be taxed as excess land unless it was actually put to use by the church.. It was
W clarified that minimum size required for the site for a church is five acres.
Mr. Larry Laukka, member of the Building Committee of the church, said that
the church has outgrown its present location at 56th and Wooddale Avenue. He
reviewed the history of the church and said that the proposed church would contain
650 seats and parking provisions for 220..cars. Mr. Laukka explained that the
church had been. designed with the town houses an omes in the area in mind as to
scale and shape. Mr. Hamel, the architect, presented the site plan and cross
sections illustrating the entire perking lot, explaining that much of the build -
ing itself would be hidden by a 15 foot berm which would be constructed to the
North. He explained that the parking lot would be depressed into the hill and
that the long driveways designed to provide access to the site would accom-
modate traffic without causing a problem in the neighborhood, adding that the
church is complying with the standards of the Environmental Quality Commission and
the Watershed District. In response to a question of Councilman Richards, it was
explained that the buildable portions of the site are limited and that the exten-
sion of the hill would shield the parking lot from view of the neighbors and would
provide for sound abatement. Discussion was had as to the comparative traffic
patterns of a church as opposed to traffic patterns of the town houses originally
proposed. Mr. Hyde pointed out that the church is providing parking facilities
which would be adequate for 650 seats, but that if the size of the church should
be increased to 1,000 seats, the parking lot would have to be increased 50 %. :Ir.
Hamel said that those parking facilities could be constructed along the Western
boundary. Council was assured that the church would be glad to discuss the matter
bf the land immediately adjacent to the park with City officials. Mr. Russell
Spence, 5900 Olinger Blvd., said that neighbors had met with representatives of the
church, and, while not generally opposed to the rezoning or general plans, did have
the following concerns about the layout: 1) Could the entire site be moved to
South toward the Crosstown Highway, thus saving the hill? 2) Does the road need
to come in from Tracy Avenue and circle in front of the town houses? 3) Proximity
of the parking area to neighbors on the West and the North; 4) The type of light-
ing that may be used; 5) The possibility of moving the parking lot; 6) Concern
about landscaping the berm; 7) The possibility of constructing ingress and
egress from Tracy Ave. Mr. Spence then requested that the hearing be continued
for thirty days so that residents could meet again with the church, and sub -
1 ter be held over for thirty days so
matted a petition requesting that the mat
that alternate proposals could be discussed for building "an adequate church com-
eplex for its use without moving lakes, destroying lovely hills and replacing them
with asphalt parking lots, building unnecessary roads and doing other damage to
the adjacent homeowners and to the residents of the Village of Edina in general."
Mr. Daniel Grant, representing residents of Nine Mile Village joined in Mr.
Spence's request. Mr. Laukka recalled that Pemtom had proposed to eliminate the
hill entirely and said that the church has used extreme concern and care in the
proposed development and that they would meet with residents at the time they are
developing their landscape plans, and advised that the purchase agreement between
the church and Pemtom expires next month. Mr. Luce explained that this hearing
Is only for concept approval and that the project would have to go back to the
Planning Commission with final development plans before coming back to the Council.
c. C, . <�- 19 --ns
Following considerable discussion, Councilman Courtney's motion was seconded by
Councilman Shaw and carried, continuing the hearing for two weeks in order to
give additional time for further discussion between the church and the neighbors.
Mr. Laukka reminded Council that he does not believe that it will be economically
feasible to encroach further on the pond. In reponse to a question of Councilman
Shaw, Mr. Laukka said that there has been some discussion of building a home for
ithe aged on the site but that there are no specific plans at this time.
OLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA GRANTED CONCEPT APPROVAL. ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A62 GRANTED
FIRST READING. "fr. Luce presented the request of the Colonial Church of ZU=n
for zoning change* from PRD -2 Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Resi-
dential District for property located generally North of the Crosstown Highway,
South of Olinger Blvd., East of Bredesen Park and Village 9 and West of Country -
i side Park-and the Edina Fire Station. Mr. Luce recalled that the hearing had been
• continued from June 2, 1975, so that the church could discuss the location of the
_1 parking lot and cutting down the hill with neighbors. Mr. Richard Hammel, represent-.
Ing the church, showed slides indicating adjustments made to relocate the protective
berm so that the parking lot will be visibly concealed from the North. Mr. Hammel
also explained that the proposed ring road will be eliminated as requested by
neighbors. Council was advised that the Environmental Quality Commission had
voiced no opposition to using part of the pond for the building site and that,
"to the best of their understanding ", the pond is not considered "public waters"
Inasmuch as it was developed by PemTom only two years ago. Mr. Hammel said that
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District had approved the plans and the concept has
been developed with their considerable help. He clarified that ten to twelve feet
will be removad from the top of the hill to construct the berm, reducing the
elevation from 892 feet to 880 feet at the highest point. Mrs. Phyllis R. Sever-
_ seike, 6344 Sandpiper Court, representing ten Village 9 families, objected to
the location of the parking lot on the West edge of the site, which lot is proposed
to serve members of the congregation who daily use the church facilities for meet-
ings and for the nursery school and which would be used by delivery trucks and for
garbage pick -up. Mrs. Severseike suggested that the parking lot be replaced by a
turn- around which would be used to service the church, aid the traffic flow, be
least disruptive to the natural beauty of the area, and which would prevent heavy
daily traffic in the area closest to adjacent dwellings. Mr. Lawrence A. Laukka,
member of Colon ±al Church, suggested -the possibility of the church using the skating
rink parking lot for future overflow parking in the event the church expands from
f its proposed seating capacity of 660 to a possible 1,000. Mr. Laukka also clarified
thct the building plans have not yet been approved by the congregation. Mrs.
Virginia Scott, 6613 Southcrest Drive, was told that the construction of the church
would not increase the amount of water draining from the property to Nine Mile
Creek, but would cause a more rapid run -off. COUNCIL COURTNEY'S pt0'CION grant-
ing concept approval, with the suggestion that the church work with residents to
the West in regard to the parking lot, was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried.
Councilman Courtney thereupon offered Ordinance No. 811 -A62 for First Reading as
follows:
ORDINANCE. NO. 811 -A62
AN ORDINANCE &MENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 188)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED I,F.SIDT NTIAI. DLSTRICT (PRD -1)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THL•• C1.1•Y O1' EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph 4 of Section 5 of
Ordinance No. 188 of the City is
enlarged by adding the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residential District (Sub- District PRD-1) is en-
larged by the addition of the following property:
t of Government• Lot 1, and of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4
That par
That 5, Township 116 North, Range 21 West of the 5th Principal Mcridian,
of described as follows: Commencing at the point of intersection of the Northerly
line of County Highway No. 62 with a line, drawn due North from a point on
Lot 1,•distant 71 1/2 rods East of the South-
the South line of said Government ue North to the North line of
west corner of said Government Lot 1; thence d
said Government Lot 1; thence East along the North line of said Government Lot
1 and along the North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 to a
point distant 693 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Northeast 1/4 of -
the Northwest 1/4; thence South parallel with the East line of said Northeast
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 693 feet; thence East parallel with the
North line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 a distance of 693 feet
to the East line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4; thence South
along said East line to the Northerly line of said County highway No. 62;
• thence Westerly along said Northerly line of said County Highway No. 62; more
specifically set forth and described as that part of "Line A," Parcel No.
A -18 (CSAH No. 62, Project No. 6221) contained in that First Certificate,
dated August 21, 1967, and filed August 25, 1967, in Book 2599 of Deeds, page
347, as it crosses said premises herein described to the point of beginning;
EXCEPTING therefrom, the East 233 feet of said Northeast 114 of the Northwest
1/4 of Section 5, Township 116, Range 21, lying South of the South line of tha ^`
. North 693 feet of said Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 (which is in Sub -
District PRD -1)."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
S.
Rezoning Z -77 -9
Subdivision
S -77 -6 & Flood
Plain Permit
FP -6
Colonial Church of Edina. Generally located south of
Olinger Boulevard and west of Tracy Avenue. PRD -1
Planned Residential District to PRD -1 Planned Residential
District (Plan Change).
Mr. Luce said the request is essentially a plan modification. The site is
presently zoned for townhouse development (rezoned several years ago when Pemtom
owned the property). The proponent received preliminary rezoning approval two
years ago for a church but did not request final approval in time allowed by the
ordinance, so they are now back.again with essentially the same plans to repeat the
process and gain concept approval once again for the Colonial Church development
plans. Mr. Luce recommended approval of the requested rezoning, subdivision,
and flood plain permit with the following stipulations:
A. The final development plans must include:
1. An improved site plan identifying and clarifying proposed grades and
dimensions.
2. Delineation of future parking to accommodate future seating.
3. An improved landscaping plan illustrating landscape materials in an
appropriate quantity and scale for the site and buildings, surface treat-
ment of the entire parcel, and screening of parking and loading areas.
B. The rezoning is contingent upon completion of the final plat and the flood plain
permit.
C. Submission of an approved Developer's Agreement and parkland dedication prior
to approval of the final plat.
D. The combination of Lots 1 and 2 into one lot prior to approval of the final
plat.
Mr. Craig Hinrichs of Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, architects for the church,
presented slides illustrating the church design and construction. Mr. Jim Goulet,
also of Hammel, Green and Abrahamson, showed graphics illustrating the drainage
plans for the church. He said there would be two accesses to the church to allow
for less concentrated traffic in one single area.
Mr. Luce said the parking lot is designed to accommodate 220 cars with 20
additional spaces near the loading entrance. The meeting hall is designed to seat
650 people on the main floor with future expansion in the balcony to accommodate
1000 people total. The proposed meeting hall with have a 60 foot height at
the ridge line and the bell tower would be 120 feet.
Mr. and Mrs. J. Evensrud, 5820 Olinger Boulevard, were present to indicate
their objection to the proposal.
Mr. Runyan moved for approval of the requests with the stipulations as stated r
in the staff report and listed by Mr. Luce, and Mrs. McClelland seconded. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
N
or
PARKING LOT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, Made and entered into this day of ,
1977, by and between THE COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA, a Minnesota nonprofit cor-
poration (hereinafter called "Church "), and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota
municipal corporation (hereinafter called "City ");
WITNESSETH, THAT:
WHEREAS, City is the fee owner of the following described premises:
Lot 1, Block 1, Colonial Church of Edina First Addi-
tion, according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the County Recorder in and
for Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter called
the "City Property ");
which, together with additional adjacent land owned by the City, is to be used
for public park purposes; and
WHEREAS, Church is the fee owner of the following described premises:
Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina First Addi-
tion, according to the plat thereof on file and of
record in the office of the County Recorder in and
for Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter called
the "Church Property "),
upon which there are to be constructed church facilities including a meeting
room designed to seat approximately 650 persons and to be expandable by finish-
ing balconies to seat approximately persons; and
WHEREAS, City and Church desire that an automobile parking area
should be developed on the City Property for the common use and benefit of the
users of said public park and of said church facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, In consideration of the mutual covenants and agree-
ments herein contained, Church and City do hereby agree as follows:
1. Church shall, on or before November 1, 1978, and at its sole ex-
pense, do the following with respect to the City Property:
(a) Perform all grading necessary to cause the City
Property to conform to the Site Plan for the
Church Property and the City Property dated May
19, 1977, prepared by Hammel, Green and
J
Abrahamson, Inc.;
(b) Cause the parking area shown on said Site Plan
(the "Parking Area ") to be improved to the ex-
tent of installing a six inch (6 ") , class five
(5) gravel base thereon; and
(c) Install all curb cuts shown on said Site Plan
providing access to the Parking Area from Pilgrim
Way.
If such work has not been accomplished by Church on or before November 1,
1978, the City may perform that part thereof which is left to be accomplished
and the cost thereof, together with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from
the date of demand shall be paid by Church.
2. Church shall have the perpetual, exclusive right to use the Park-
ing Area for automobile parking purposes by its members, guests and employees
on Sunday mornings until 12:00 noon and the perpetual, nonexclusive right to
use the Parking Area for automobile parking purposes by its members, guests and
employees at all other times during the week. The Parking Area shall be con-
sidered as providing 108 automobile parking spaces to Church for purposes of com-
pliance with all parking requirements of the City under its ordinances now or
hereafter in force applicable to Church Property.
3. If the meeting room in the church facilities to be constructed
upon the Church Property is expanded to seat approximately persons, the
Church, at its sole expense, promptly.shall cause the Parking Area to be improved
so as to comply with such City construction standards for paved parking areas as
may then be applicable. If Church should fail or refuse to cause the Parking
Area to be so improved in such event, then City may cause such improvements to be
made and the cost thereof, together with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per
annum from the date of demand shall be paid by Church.
At any time City may cause the Parking Area to be improved so as to
comply with applicable City construction standards for paved parking areas,
in which event Church shall reimburse City for the actual cost of such improve-
-2-
men'ts at such time, if ever, as the meeting room in the church facilities to
be constructed upon the Church Property is expanded to seat approximately
persons. If Church should fail or refuse to so reimburse City, then such cost
shall bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of demand.
In the. event. City reasonably determines that the Parking Area im-
provements required in Paragraph 1 are inadequate to the use of the Parking
Area by Church before the above described expansion of the meeting room in the
new church facilities, City may request and Church, at its sole expense,
promptly shall cause the Parking Area to be improved so as to comply with such
City construction standards for paved parking areas as may then be applicable.
4. City agrees to, at its expense, keep and maintain the Parking
Area at all times in good condition and state of repair and free from snow and
debris; provided, however, that City shall have no obligation to remove snow
therefrom on Sundays.
5. The covenants and agreements herein contained shall be deemed to
run with the land and be binding upon the parties hereto and their successors
and assigns.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The parties hereto have caused this Agreement to
be -duly executed as of the date first above written.
THE COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA
By
Its
And
Its
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its Mayor
And
Its City Manager
-3-
rj
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day
of , 1977, by and
respectively the and of THE
COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, on behalf of the
corporation.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day
of , 1977, by and
respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation.
-4-
LOCATION MA.P
1
/- IMC CAULET TR ,4IL HEST
/ CROSSVIE i
r / ' LUTHERAN CHURCH
z
w _
J_
C
N Q
a
W
� c
a Q,
aEE
'INDIA : •L
111 t L f
CIRCL9
1Np
subdivisior%l
ZOVI-%i�
REQUEST NUMBER: 5-77-7 and z -77 -10
LOCATION: w. of McCauley Trail & S.
of McCauley Lane.
REQUEST: 3 double bungalow lots and
2 single family lots.
0
IK
r
village planning department v linge o[ c— nA
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
April 19, 1977
`New- Business :
1. Subdivision Betty McCauley. McCauley Heights 8th Addition.
S -77 -7 and Generally located south•of McCauley Lane, north of
Rezoning Margaret's Lane and east of County Road 18. R -1
Z -77 -10 Single Family Residential District to R -2 Multiple
Family Residential District.
Refer to: Parkland Dedication Report and survey.
The proponents are requesting a five lot subdivision and rezoning for four
lots which front on McCauley Trail.. One of those lots, however, realistically
has access only from McCauley Terrace due to the topography. In
discussing this matter with the McCauleys, they indicated a willingness
to retain that property as a single family lot.
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed rezoning,
limited to lots 1, 2, and 4 of the proposed addition. The staff would also
recommend approval of the requested subdivision, contingent on a parkland
dedication per the attached report and a dedication of five feet adjacent
to McCauley Trail for sidewalk, bikeway, and.snow storage purposes.
GL:ln
April 15, 1977
�% � , 1` .a " •-' `;1 'J s '�] -ir -� •� /' .i.•l I..`..l -ice- {"' �5 .� I'
A4 Af
AI
i 7 /., jr yr��v tii4...••.•._ �: i~ �,
. v °'� � ., /• '� i�'.r• �^ _ . \` Yfff�''.JY' ti >� �_-`i.i ''�.:.�,''::iS- .iL• -'.. : .�-
���1]' ��'' ,. �,'? fir° (• o-; = \ •. � ,�f .� ,: •r' ,�.• d•ri� = '�A��� i _ _ , � . -- - ;
,�- f ` 9• ,� Ja�V = :� - ��!Ot�IC��•. -,fs� - t�� :��o:�. o'��� . ^= � _ ` - .
. • %y •.t- .: �.: S\ �' 't-:1 .,.-�t ;�- it:,.. �-r' •+' • • r?� :ate- _ - . - - "r '- T..
t --
�� `J •�5tL3'r. s�: {Fi - ,:-,r\ z 'y,1�✓ �: � yi �i' � �,� O'�'• =' -.t- m - ,� -
�' -^'�f Q i!� Lac.. _ - _ ..� -. _•�
..r \ :23:, - _ 3' Lr� .4 Jf = `.rJ'X�r .�;�. + >- Y• ��- `1
�! \. / r _f.i f. l-?• �� /; ��.. �_ nom. �- - - - � -
r G _ _ - . •^ 1. _- - - - - ate. = ] . _ -:=! � _ - -
t --
f �-
5L 7F
t4
000 z►�J^f`�t3>�.:3=- .3Q.�.
-'� �• �, / - _ . h �:i i'C _ - � `o. • 7•
;G_:c
'ti r._ i...� �7,- ". \- t '�t1 i Ai'� -�'• _ f[. "f _w 7 V -• �;
.—t �"'f�],.ri�,•^:.. +,tll'iD) t•!JJ 'rJ.•1 l _ )`. `7. J!, •1 _ -�4C - -.= _Y'-• -
rJ Z ;•�a. T zm
- .iL ..�t - _,..s -•J T �•.:Y'J Y -"ry S; "G ►�� SZ•►tc. -- _. _ � o ~� _ �. ��` r.r.,, - �� �' -
.-ti '' r _ • mss.'• % 1.7 r J mkt," t� :� - -�"''� �'- °:}• w • - _ �� L.J :-� 5-f-f 17 __ ''`: �• =, `•:� -! = . � i --rr -
:z, iy.:.�.t�
it p .. � _ .�� -:' �'' ° � : - 13 -\,f � � \ � _ -Jl'�- 4.r/ t -_". "' - , I - - _ . •"�' - - - -._
-- .��, ;6�•j•� 717 -� �$►. -� - =-'' -� '•` iot.'t"i \- -.�. _ ��i•� -" 1�- �•��• -#-- .-� _ -� _
�YS'� .�.L,t �r•3i�y,_ `'�' -' -� +' _ �. •'�\•�yf \'• .7��,_ "'1i '_. .. _ t fir_ t�� _
�� ��� '''-�� _ *ice - -� � .!�*4T -- •• •���� J. ` -_. _ , _ � -•� � - _ _
.r +♦, �`� x -- sue_ —_':� - `' �.� --?'�' t l`
t ; SGCyL -••r'' -ir.- Via...` N.
•,,. .`.-i -t.si 33_`x- _ :f'. f'•V .7.:_- _ _ - L.''�':S`1V„ .ter -: i'- 1`,.�.:d- _
:r ^`. T 3. , •yam ;1i r - , }. `•fr�~ ~�,.`_.2 -.. -�` '�`, _ `•. j'.Jl' —fir g
;/►. i ti�'•`'`� .' -" 1� .. Y.;, r)� �:•'' ,�-.; •`
- 1 �3at7.tA,^.Oy` \'r�,\f�` _ �:��L•lI) ..,'��+• •,cs - ,�{'y�wx.�'� .~'��.?' ��.''._� -_. :�'r�:t'GZ' -- '�-
Oi
-. � ' a • ^� _ .. .. �./�� :�: ..• ~•` K�!.�••.- - \l.i� ... � .::�:�.'A. ^;M.1- .J�•-.I��. ^��I v�� f: ��/`L�►7 �....+V.SJ-Lr:.
Lot areas in proposed
Lot 1 - 15,800 square
Lot 2 - 16,500 square
Lot 3 - 20,000 square
Lot 4 - 16,500 square
I.ot 5 - 23,800 square
Total Area —2:1 acres
McCauley Heights 8th Additi.on,
feet Prepared by: Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc
feet Surveyors
feet
feet
feet
Subdivision No.�
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAIL: Moo �60,s "' . A?U Ae.Y1
LAND SIZE: . �.�r/ = • I., jGt LAND VALUE CDC
(By: - Date: )
Z'he developer of this subdivision. has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
��.. B. dedicate 8 of the land
C. donate $ ;L5' as. a fee in lieu of land
As a result of - applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for,the first 5% of
land - dedicated)
j "�.1. If property is adjacent to an.existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future.dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or- stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holing or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or-ponds.
5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his -
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
LO�ATIlON
•�
got
IL
\ J- 'CI C E I !r_.+EYE I
i
C b f. It E
� W
O �
j .•.'' C
ASS °s
AR T
Q
i , I O u
r ° w
D
gRAEMAR !
BALLPARK ;•� .
�? C0NAPLEXY =a I'
I f , ' ' •t. WILD FLOWER
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: S -77 -5
LOCATION :E. of Comanche Court along
Valley View Road.
REQUEST: 2 -3.o single family plat.
village planning del}artment villnae of edin�
L➢ MAP
� T�tQ ►�� •6t �. .•.., �.1 i i
>
W
E \ \ W ! IR00 OIS
IL Cl C E LHEYE •�•
C1RCLE
LJ
o cc
1 = —
W
rIv
i� 1 •� _ O G \'� U O ' OC
11� 141r aSS
.� 1 X14 _--1 y `' _�'c;•�� AR Tf y
II 11. T� C-
f.�
•� IB u ~ ��� � L
•' ate.,` 3
BRA
Ii•\, O tJ I J � v
(
0 i.
j
.,`ti ry . '� °tJ .. rt }_ �1 • �" B R A E M A R
BAL' PARK ;_ "•.' n
subdivisllffCJ,n,--%l
REQUEST NUMBER: • S -77 -4
LOCATION :s. of Paiute Pass & E. of
Comanche Court.
REQUEST: 2 -lot single family plat.
village planning devmrtnlent v*lleae of rdins
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
March 30, 1977
II. New Business:
5. Subdivision Muir Woods 2nd Addition. C. L.
S -77 -4 and of Lot 1, Block 1, Muir Woods.
Paiute Pass and east of Comanche
Fraser and M. Weegman. Part
Generally located south of
Court.
6. Subdivision Muir Woods 3rd Addition. C. L. Fraser and M. Weegman. Part
S -77 -5 of Lot 1, Block 1, Muir Woods. Generally located east of
Comanche Court along Valley View Road.
Refer to: Preliminary plat.
The proponents are requesting subdivision approval for two subdivisions which
are contiguous and located northeast of the Valley View /County Road 18 inter-
change. Both sites contain steep slopes and are heavily wooded. These proper-
ties were divided for tax purposes approximately ten years ago and two separate
tracts exist today. It is assumed that a building permit for each tract could
be issued ba -sed on present conditions which allow the development of two home -
sites. As can be seen on the attached graphic, the access to the proposed
2nd addition is limited to a 20 -foot drive and a small "Y" for a turn - around.
It is our opinion that that is too limited an area for access to two homesites.
The lots sizes in the 1st addition are 20,000 square feet and 32,500 square
feet. L'ot sizes across the street are generally between 13,000 and 14,000 square
feet and, in Iroquois Hills Addition, are as small as 11,200 square feet.
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of Muir Woods 3rd Addition
and denial of Muir Woods 2nd Addition. The approval of Muir Woods 3rd Addition
is conditioned on the following:
1. That the unplatted tract herein identified as Muir Woods 2nd Addition be
incorporated into Muir Woods 3rd Addition as a single lot.
2. That prior to any development of the site, a tree removal permit be received.
3. That prior to any grading on the site, a grading permit be received.
We have received numerous petitions and letters regarding this proposed
development from the adjacent single family homeowners and comments especially
regard the loss of trees and wildlife and the grading. The Engineering Department,
however, has reviewed the driveway access as well as the other parts of this
subdivision and has reported that a drive access could be installed for this
site without any problem and with minimum grading. The petitions and letters
are too numerous to xerox and send to the Commission; however, they will be made
available at the hearing. The reasons for this recommendation are:
1. The use is consistent with the Western Edina Plan.
EDINA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
March 30, 1977
Muir Woods 2nd and 3rd Additions.
Refer to: attached graphic.
The proponents are requesting two, two -lot subdivisions of two tracts of
land which were divided from the Muir Woods Addition several years ago.
Muir Woods 2nd Addition as proposed would be located east of Comanche Court
and would obtain access by way of a private road from Valley View Road.
Muir Woods 3rd Addition located southerly of the 2nd Addition would create
two lots fronting on Valley View Road. All four lots are in a 25,000 to
30,000 square foot size range.
The site of both proposed subdivisions is heavily timbered with oaks and
other hardwoods. Slopes on the site are very steep, i.e. 35% - 40%.
It must be assumed that a substantial number of trees must be removed to
construct the proposed access road and dwellings.
Recommendation:
Staff is very reluctant to recommend approval of the proposed subdivisions
due to the characteristics of the site. However, it must be recognized
that the proposed subdivisions are located on separate tracts of land legally
divided in the past. Thus, a request by the owner for a reasonable use of
these parcels is a very difficult request to deny. Staff would submit,
however, that the two lots proposed for 14uir Woods 2nd Addition are not reasonable
in that they must be served by a private road of only twenty feet in width.
Such a road serving only one dwelling, however, is adequate.
Staff, thus, recommends denial of Muir Woods 2nd Addition in that. access to
the site is inadequate. Staff would, however, recommend approval of a revised
Muir Woods 2nd Addition which incorporates the two lots of Muir Woods 3rd
and one lot located on the tract of land presently proposed as Muir Woods.
Approval is contingent on the proponents 1) submitting a soil erosion plan
and 2) obtaining a tree- cutting permit.
GLH:nr
3 -25 -77
Edina Planning Commission
Page 2
March 30, 1977
2. The property is now two separate tracts of land which are proposed to be
divided into three tracts of land and would be nearly twice as large as
the surrounding lots. The lot sizes are, however, appropriate for this
hilly and wooded area.
3... Access to the proposed 2nd Addition for two lots is unacceptable in that
there is not room to turn around without entering onto private property.
GL:nr
3 -25 -77
'O
ol
b.
L
4r
G
IROC�j0i%'.
FWRTm ADD.
rb
C I A 173t I D-A- 1: R,
L A N D S U R V E Y 0 R S
Phone 612 -941-313Z
Eden pi3ilic Minnesota. 55343
G440 Flyint Cloud Olive, -
- ;' <.� ": I Revisions Drawn B Dale
Scaly: t
Eq 7
CXCI
Book Page
S -77 -4
of Lot 1, Block 1, Muir
Woods. Generally located south of
r
Paiute Pass
and east of
Comanche Court.
�3 and
Subdivision
Muir Woods
3rd Addition.
C. L. Fraser and M. Weegman.
S -77 -5
Part of Lot
1, Block 1,
Muir Woods. Generally located east
of Comanche
Court along
Valley View Road.
Mr. Luce explained he was going to present the two requests together because
they were made by the same proponent. He presented numerous petitions and letters
to the Planning Commission from various neighbors indicating their objections.
He explained two subdivisions are requested because the properties are separate
tracts of land. The first request, Muir Woods 3rd Addition, is located on Valley
View Road and the proponent is requesting to divide the site into two single family
lots. The second parcel, Muir Woods 2nd Addition, is located south of Paiute Pass
and east of Comanche Court. The proponent is requesting to divide that site into
two single family lots with an access drive onto Valley View Road; thus, if the
request is approved, rezoning to PRD -1 will be necessary to allow for this drive
with PRD -1 allowing only for single family lots. The proposed drive would be
20 feet wide and would have a small turn-a- round. Mr. Luce indicated the area is
heavily wooded and the topography is with steep slopes. The Engineering Department
had reviewed the request and whether drive would be possible, and it was their
impression, and that of the staff, that the proposed turn-a -round would be too limited
for two homesites. Therefore, staff recommended the proposed Muir Woods 2nd Addition
not be' approved because of the access drive. Mr. Luce further recommended that Muir
Woods 3rd Addition, which would have access directly onto Valley View Road, be
approved for the following reasons:
1. The use is consistent with the Western Edina Plan.
2. The property is now two separate tracts of land which are proposed to be divided
into three tracts of land and would be nearly twice as large as the surrounding
lots. The lots sizes are, however, appropriate for. this hilly and wooded area.
3. Access to the proposed 2nd Addition for two lots is unacceptable in that there
is not room to turn around without entering onto private property.
a
Approval of Muir Woods 3rd Addition shoul.d.be contingent upon:
1. That the unplatted tract herein identified as Muir Woods 2nd Addition be
incorporated into Muir Woods 3rd Addition as a single lot.
2. That prior to any development of the site, a tree removal permit be received.
3. That prior to any grading on the site', a grading permit be received.
4.• Parkland Dedication be required prior fo final plat approval.
Mr. Roger Stageberg, 6609 Paiute Pass, asked if lots in the 2nd Addition
could be appropriately serviced by the 20 -foot wide access drive. Mr. Luce
responded that the same type of drive exists in several other areas and that
it was more than adequate for one homesite. He noted that approximately a 10-
foot strip of tax delinquent land owned by the County adjacent to the property
could be purchased by the proponent to widen the -drive to 30 feet. Mr. Stageberg
said he wished to present the views of the neighbors and would address himself
primarily to the 2nd Addition; however, many of the same arguments are also
applicable to the 3rd Addition. He said there was a restrictive covenant which
said no lot in Muir Woods Subdivision could be subdivided and thus people of
Muir Woods had a legal right to prevent the two subdivisions. He also said the
adjacent property owner, Dr. Martin Peper, was'not able to attend the meeting
as he was out of town, but asked him to say that he, as owner of Lot 1, Block 1,'
Muir Woods, did not wish to waive his rights under the restrictive covenant as
written in May, 1958, by George W. Harsh, in which a restriction is provided
for subdivision of Lot 1. He said the surrounding property owners had adequately
expressed their opinions in letters and petitions, and he said that when he looked
at the plat maps at Hennepin County the lot was not in existence and he thus
did not realize such a lot existed. He emphasized that the neighbors would have
a driveway in their backyards. Mr. Luce said that the driveway would be
present even if only one lot existed. Mr. Stageberg continued that the driveway
would cause problems in fire protection because of its narrowness. He felt
the road would also cause problems with water drainage because of the steep slope
as water will run off the slope into the backyards of the neighbors.
Mr. Luce clarified that the neighbors should be made aware that only a court
of law or all the neighbors signing the declaration of covenants and restrictions
can modify those restrictions and that the Planning Commission cannot modify
or recognize them and must act independently from them. He said, however, that
the Planning Commission has held over requests when litigation was pending.
He also said that while the lot may not have shown on Hennepin County's plat
map, they have recognized this division since 1965. Mr. Dunn, the City Engineer,
said tree removal for the driveway may be a problem, but he reassured the neighbors
that the proponents would fill the driveway correctly and it may even result in
an improved drainage situation. Mr. Luce said the proponent has a right to build
on the site, thus it would be very difficult to deny a building permit. In re-
sponse to Mr. C. Johnson, Mr. Luce said the Commission could hold over or deny
the proposed plat of Muir Woods 2nd Addition and require that it.be a maximum
of three lots in combination of the two plats. .Mr. Stageberg recommended there
be a formal report from the Fire Department as to the accessibility of the
proposed home on the'lot referred to as Muir Woods 2nd Addition.
3 -30-77 Planning Commission Minutes, Page 5
Mr. Kremer said one alternate possibility to prevent the development of
this property would be for the owner to sell it to the surrounding property
owners and they could keep it as parkland. He asked the proponent if he
had explored this possibility, and the proponent responded that he had not but
felt it was a good one. The neighbors generally agreed and decided to pursue
it further. Mr. C. Johnson moved for approval of Muir Woods 3rd Addition
with the stipulations stated in the staff report and as listed by the staff,
and recommended the Commission hold over the Muir Woods 2nd Addition until the
April 19, 1977, Planning Commission meeting. Mr. G. Johnson seconded. All voted
i aye. Motion carried.
� i, WOODS TIiIRD ADDITION GRANTED PRTTJL ITNARY PLAT AT'PROVAL. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Actin; Clerk, approved as to form and ordered place=. on file.
C 11 -Ir. Luce. presented Muir. [floods Third addition for preliminary plat approval.,
noting; that this plat is generally located cast of Comanche Court along Valley
I�( View road, and that it contains :steep slopes and is heavily wooded. lie advised
Yj that the proponents propose to 'divide the property into two humesites fronting
on Valley View I:oad with a 25,000 to 30,000 square foot size range. Ile advised
'iAizt the staff, the Planning Commission and the Environmental ualit Commi ion
recommended approval contingent oil tile following: 1) That the unplatted tract
herein identified as.Muir Woods 2nd Addition be incorporated into Muir Woods 3rd
Addition as a single lot; 2) That prior to any development of the site, a tree
removal permit be received; 3) That prior to any grading on the site, a grading
permit be received; and 4) Parkland dedication be required prior to final plat
approval. Councilman Shaw offered the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVINC PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
MUIR WOODS TIIIRD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Muir Woods Third Addition ", platted by C. L. Fraser and
M. Weegman and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of April 18, 1977,
be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval subject to the following
contingencies:
1. That the unplatted tract herein identified as Muir Woods 2nd Addition
be incorporated into Muir Woods 3rd Addition as a single lot.
2. That ,prior to any development of the site, a tree removal permit be
received.
3. That prior to any grading on the site, a grading permit be •received.
4. Parkland dedication be required prior to final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilwoman Schmidt.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Schmidt, Shaw, Van Valkenburg
Nays: None
Resolution adopted.
I .
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
June 1, 1977
III. New Business:
12. R -2 Two Family Dwelling District Maximum Lot Coverage Standards.
Refer to: attached ordinance amendment.
The staff has received a number of requests from developers t o incuease
the lot coverage allowed within the two family dwelling
ordinance restricts the total ground coverage of. allstructureeSall accessory
of 20 percent of the total lot area.
structures, including decks, are included in the calculations. Roof overhangs,
driveways, sidewalks, patios, swimming pools, tennis courts, etc.s are not
included in lot coverage calculations. The 20 percent limit is the lowest
in the city; the proposed 25 percent coverage is con-
required for any zone
sistent with the single family zone.
Recommendation: The R -2 zone has generally been regaofe�hessame parallel
characteristics;
single family zone and has increasingly assumed many
therefore, the staff recommends approval for the following reasons:
1. The adoption of the single family standard for the R -2 zone is desirable
because it dncourages the trend toward owner- occupied units.
adble front and rear yard space will be preserved by the setback
2, equate usa
standards
dwelling
3. The net usable lot area-per dwelling
yards l t t l
will be compensatedbyfewersidee•
The smaller lot area per g
yards (which have limited usefulness).
4. The garage standards in the R -2 zone have increased without commensurate
increases in the lot coverage.
5. There are a large number of existing doubles with non-conforming
lot
nonconforming lot coverage or deficient garage capacity
from the proposed change.
HS:nr
5 -27 -77
. ffs44
"
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
June 1, 1977
III. New Business:
12. R -2 Two Family Dwelling District Maximum Lot Coverage Standards.
Refer to: attached ordinance amendment.
The staff has received a number of requests from developers t o incuease
the lot coverage allowed within the two family dwelling
ordinance restricts the total ground coverage of. allstructureeSall accessory
of 20 percent of the total lot area.
structures, including decks, are included in the calculations. Roof overhangs,
driveways, sidewalks, patios, swimming pools, tennis courts, etc.s are not
included in lot coverage calculations. The 20 percent limit is the lowest
in the city; the proposed 25 percent coverage is con-
required for any zone
sistent with the single family zone.
Recommendation: The R -2 zone has generally been regaofe�hessame parallel
characteristics;
single family zone and has increasingly assumed many
therefore, the staff recommends approval for the following reasons:
1. The adoption of the single family standard for the R -2 zone is desirable
because it dncourages the trend toward owner- occupied units.
adble front and rear yard space will be preserved by the setback
2, equate usa
standards
dwelling
3. The net usable lot area-per dwelling
yards l t t l
will be compensatedbyfewersidee•
The smaller lot area per g
yards (which have limited usefulness).
4. The garage standards in the R -2 zone have increased without commensurate
increases in the lot coverage.
5. There are a large number of existing doubles with non-conforming
lot
nonconforming lot coverage or deficient garage capacity
from the proposed change.
HS:nr
5 -27 -77
ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 811
BY INCREASING THE LOT COVERAGE ALL014ED
IN THE R -2 MULTIPLE RESIDENCE DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subparagraph b. of paragraph 3 of Section 4. (Multiple
Residence District) is hereby amended to read as follows:
"(b.) Lot Coverage and Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
District Maximum Lot Coverage Maximum FAR
R -2 25%
R -3 30% -
R -4 30% -
R -5 25% 1.2
The floor area ratio is the gross floor area of all buildings on a lot divided
by the lot area."
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon
its passage and publication.
To: Mayor and.Council
N,1
From: Arlin Waelti �7J�
Re: Community:HeaTtti Services Act Plan -sand "Statutory°Requirements
. The preliminary plan for the 1978 Comprehensive Health Plan for the Community
Health Services Act has been submitted to Hennepin County as of June 17. The
Community Health Services Act provides that the City Council may, by resolution,
assume the powers and duties of the local Board of.Health.. In preparing the
1978 . Plan, it has come to our attention that Edina has not, to.date, passed such
a resolution. For that reason, I recommend that the attached resolution.establish -
ing the Edina City Council as the Edina Board of Health be passed.
Hennepin County has requested that all sections of the 1978 Comprehensive Health
Plan that require either approval or.signatures.be completed in full prior to the
- Hennepin County Board meeting on July 9th. Included within the Plan is a required
resolution of the Council approving Community Health Services in the City of Edina
and the submission of an application for same. Inasmuch as the 1978 Plan is
substantially similar to that of the previous year and since Council member June
Schmidt has already reviewed the preliminary draft of the proposal with staff
members Ken Esse, Dave Velde, Teri Myre and me, I. recommend that the resolution
approving the plan and submitting an application for the Community Health Services
Act subsidy be passed.
The Community Health Services.Act further provides that one third of the members
of the.Advisory Board of Health be consumers selected to represent consumer
organizations or constituencies within the community. Appointment of two more
consumer members to the Edina Advisory Board is necessary.for.compliance with the
Act. I recommend that the Mayor appoint two consumer members to the Advisory
Board prior to the meeting of the Advisory Board on July 5th.
Fifteen copies of the Preliminary Comprehensive Health Plan are required for
submission to Hennepin County for review. Donna Anderson, from the Office of
Planning and Development,suggested that we hold thirteen of the copies until the
above requirements are met. Two copies of the preliminary plan were submitted to
the County to meet the application deadline and will -be returned for signature
along with the other thirteen - copies still within our office when the attached
resolutions are passed and statutory appointments have been made.
Dave Velde will be attending the Council meeting and will be able to answer any
further questions you may have on this matter.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has maintained an active Health Department;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for a City Board of Health to be formed to
enable the City of Edina to receive their full entitlements from the Communi-
ty Health Services subsidy funds; and
WHEREAS, M. S. Laws for Minnesota for 1976, Chapter 9 (the Community
Health Services Act, 1976) allows the City Council to exercise authority
to establish themselves as a City Board of Health;
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council assume the posers -and
duties of the Edina Board of Health pursuant to Laws of Minnesota for 1976,
Chapter 9, Section 3, Subd. 2(a).
Passed and adopted the day of 1977.
Attest:
Florence B. Hallberg
City Clerk
James Van Valkenburg
Mayor
e&.
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COK4UNITY HEALTH SERVICES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY
HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official
governing body of the City of Edina and functions as the official Board
of Health of the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and
maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and
WHEREAS, the Community Health Services'Act provides for subsidies in
support of public health services on the local level throughout the State
of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public
meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for
Community Health Services; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Edina has reviewed
the plan for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina
and recommends its approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this selfsame plan and finds it
consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by
the Advisory Board of Health and as expressed. by the citizens of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDINA IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEM$LED, that the Community Health Services Plan
for the City of. Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to
submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy.
Passed and adopted this day of , 1977.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
A '
1 . APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES SUBSIDY
LAWS OF MINNESOTA, 1976, CHAPTER 9
IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHORIZATIONS
1. APPLICANT
DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE
FOR MDH USE ONLY
City of Edina
CONTROL NUMBER
•
DATE RECEIVED
2. SPONSORING UNITS OF GOVERNMENT
3. FUNDING PERIOD
City /County
Date Approved
Jan. 01 1978
Month Day Year
City of Edina
to
Dec. 31 1978
Month Day Year
4. FISCAL MANAGEMENT OFFICER
5. AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL
if different from 4.
Name J. N. Dalen
Name Warren C. Hyae
Title Finance Officer
Title City Manager
Agency City of Edina
Agency City of Edina
Street 4801 W. 50th Street
Street 4801 W. 50th Street
City Edina
City Edina
State /Zip Minnesota 55424
State /Zip Minnesota 55424
area code Phone Number 612 927 -8861
area code Phone Number 612 927 -8861
S. ALL APPROPRIATE REGIONAL REVIEW
7. DOES THE SPONSORING UNIT(S) OF '
AGENCIES RECEIVED COPIES OF
GOVERNMENT MAINTAIN A WRITTEN EQUAL .
THIS APPLICATION. •
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM?
Yes No Date
( R) Yes ( ) No
•
If yes, has it been certified by Minnesota
HSA
Department of Human R iahts?
( R) Yes ( ) No
RDC
Date Certified March 15, 1976
8. SUBSIDY REQUESTS
Name of County(s) /City(s)
City of Edina
(Total)
Local Participation
State Share
Application is made for a subsidy under the Minnesota State Board of Health Rules MHD 451 -455 in the amount
and for the purposes stated herein. By signature, the Authorized Official agrees and has the authority to agree to
comply with the conditions and reporting requirements, consistent with annlicable MHD rules and the Community
Health Services Act as may be stipulated by the Board. In addition, by signature below, and signature affixed on
page A -2 of these forms, the authorized official assures full compliance with all items stated herein.
Authorized Official
Title City Manager
Date
(Signature)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
u
Page No.
Resolution Approving the Municipal Plan . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
1
Assurances and Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 -3
Resolution Establishing the Edina Board of Health . . . . . . . .
4
Membership list of the'Edina Board of Health . . . . . . . . • •
5
Physician Providing Medical Consultation ...
5
Membership List of the Edina Community Health Services
Advisory Committee Members of the State Community Health
Services Advisory Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . •
6
Organization Chart . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
Summary of the Activities of the Edina Community Health
Services Advisory Committee . . . . . . . .'. ..
8 -10
Identification of Community Health Service Needs . . . . . . .
11
Summary of Activities of Edina in Providing Public Health
Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
12 -14
Guidelines and Manuals Related to Family Planning, Child
Health, and Maternity Services •
15
Edina Community Health Services Programs:
Environmental Health Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16 -19
Senior Center Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . .
19 -20
Adult Health . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
20 -21
Children's Health . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
21 -22
Counseling .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22
School Health . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22 -23
Home Nursing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
23 -24
Public Information and Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
24 -25
Emergency Medical Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
25
CH'S Activity Budget Detail . . . . . . . •. . . . . .
26
Budget /Expenditure Report . . . . . . . . . ...
27
C
Page No.
Personnel Descriptions:
Director, Health Department . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . 28
Sanitarian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Director, Tri -City Public Health Laboratory . 30
Director of Public Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 31
General Duties and Qualifications of the Director of Public
Safety . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Appendix 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Appendix 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Appendix 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Appendix 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY
HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official
governing body of the City of Edina and functions as the official Board
of Health of the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and
maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and
WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in
support of public health services on the local level throughout the State
of Minnesota; and .
WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public
meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for
Community Health Services; and
WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Edina has reviewed
the plan for the provision of public health services in the'City of Edina
and recommends its approval to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this selfsame plan and finds it
consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by
the Advisory Board of Health and as expressed by the citizens of Edina;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDINA IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the Community Health Services Plan
for the City of Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to
submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy.
Passed and adopted this day of , 1977.
Attest:
City Clerk
1
Mayor
ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS
BY SIGNATURE, THE AUTHORIZED OFFICAL AGREES AND ASSURES THAT:
1. The agency will comply with state and federal requirements for equal
opportunity employment.
2. The agency will comply with state and federal requirements relating
to confidentiality of patient information'.
3. The agency will comply with all standards relating to fiscal account-
ability that apply to the Minnesota Department of Health.
a. The local matching funds identified in the budget submission
(PART IV A and B meets the following tests as well as rule
MHD 451:
1. Cash Contributions are cash outlays, including the
outlay of money contributed by other public agen-
cies and institutions and private organizations
and individuals.
2. In -Kind Contributions represent the value of non -
cash contributions provided by (1) the applicant,
(2) other public agencies and institutions, (3)
private organizations and individuals. Such
goods and services directly benefit and are spe_
cifically identifiable to the Commu_ n_ it Health
Services programs, and are iaenti` ab a from the
applicant's records. Specifically, the number of
hours of volunteer services are supported by the
same methods used by the agency for its employees
and the basis for eland nseshareedocumeted personnel
ex
services, supplies p en
b. Budget revisions will o a submitted to the State Board of
H a
Health for prior pp
1. The revision results from changes in the objective
or methods employed in the subsidy supported
activity.
2. The revision involves the addition of personnel
not previously approved in the award.
3. The cummulative amount of transfers among /between
activities exceeds or is expected to exceed 10
percent or $2,500.00 whichever is greater, of the
subsidy budget.
ASSURANCES AND AGREEMENTS
c. Reports of expenditures will be filed with the State Board
of Health on forms provided by the Board no later than 45
days following June 30 and December 31 each year.
d. Subsidy funds are used as payment for services only after
third party payments, such as Titles XVIIi, XIX, and XX and*
private insurance resources are utilized..
e. Financial Management Systems provide for:
1. Accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the
financial results of each activity.
2. Records which identify adequately the source and
application of funds for subsidy supported activi-
ties. These records contain information pertaining
to subsidy awards and authorizations, obligations,
unohligated balances; liabilities (encumbrances),
outlays, and income.
3. Effective control over the accountability for all
funds, property and other assets. Subsidy appli-
cants adequately safeguards such asserts and
assures that they are used solely for authorized
purposes.
4. Comparison of actual obligations with budget amounts
for.each subsidy.
5. Accounting records which are supported by source
documentation.
6. Audits which will be made by or at- the direction
of the subsidy applicant /Department of Health to
determine, at a minimum, the fiscal integrity of
financial transactions and reports.
7. Financial records and support Mg documentation
pertinent to the Community Health Services subsidy
which will be retained until audited, with the
following qualifications:
a. The records will be retained beyond this
period if audit-findings have not been
resolved.
b. Records for non - expendable property which
was acquired with subsidy funds will be
retained for three years after its final
disposition.
AUTHORIZED OFFICIAL
TITLE Manager, Warren Hyde
DATE
3'
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has maintained an active Health Department;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for a City Board of Health to be formed to
enable the City of Edina to receive their full entitlements from the Communi-
ty Health Services subsidy funds; and
WHEREAS, M. S. Laws for Minnesota for 1976, Chapter 9 (the Community
Health Services Act, 1976) allows the City Council to exercise authority
to establish themselves as a City Board of Health;
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council assume the powers and
duties of the Edina Board of Health pursuant to Laws of Minnesota for 1976,
Chapter 9, Section 3, Subd. 2(a).
Passed and adopted the day of , 1977•
Attest:
Florence B. Hallberg
City Clerk
4
James Van Valkenburg
Mayor
BOARD OF HEALTH AND COUNCIL MEMBERS
CITY OF EDINA
James Van Valkenburg, Mayor
4204 Philbrook Lane
Edina, MN 55424 922 -2982
C. Wayne Courtney, Councilman
4313 Eton Place
Edina, MN 55424 922 -8523
Fred Richards, Councilman
7225 Fleetwood Drive
Edina, MN 55435 941 -7626
June Schmidt, Councilwoman
7005 Bristol Boulevard
Edina, MN 55435 922 -1183
Willis F. Shaw, Councilman
5440 Halifax Lane
Edina, MN 55424 926 -9780
Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Physician
5129 Mirror Lake Dr.:
Edina, MN 55436 922 -5956
Phvsician Providing Medical Consultation
Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Physician
5129 Mirror Lake Dr.
Edina, MN 55436 922 -5956
Director, Edina Health Department
Kenneth Esse, Sanitarian
5136 Russell Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55410 922 -0239
ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH
City of Edina
Providers
Consumers
Mary Bang, R.N.
Linda A. Bjerke
5200 Duggan Plaza
6600 Nordic Drive
Edina, MN 55435
941 -4754
Edina, MN 55435
941 -2058
Dr. James Cardle
Beverly Harris
4720 Phlox Lane
4812 W. 66th Street
Edina, MN 55435
922 -2261
Edina, MN 55435
927 -9508
• Dr. E. Duane Engstrom
Verne W. Moss, Jr., Attorney
4300 Philbrook Lane
5705 Woodland Road
Edina, MN 55424
926 -6252
Edina, MN 55424
922 -7508
Dr.. Walter E. Krafft
5608 Highland Rd.
Edina, MN 55436
929 -2564
Two consumers will be
appointed.
Dr. C. V. Rockwell
5129 Mirror Lake Dr.
Edina, MN 55436
922 -5956
Dr. Richard K. Simmons
4800 Dunberry Lane
Edina, MN 55435
927 -4832
Local Government Officials
June Schmidt, City Council
7005 Bristol Blvd.
Edina, MN 55435 922 -1183
Kenneth Esse
5136 Russell Ave. So.
Edina, MN 55410 922 -0239
Tully Stoppel
6238 Upton Avenue So.
Edina, MN 55423 866 -6719
994 -2110
State Community Health Advisory Committee Member
David Velde
4801 W. 50th Street
.Edina, MN 55424 927 -8861
6
ORGANIZATION CHART
_ - - - - - - - PEOPLE OF EDINA
1
1
HEALTH ADVISORY MAYOR AND COUNCIL
COMMITTEE (BOARD OF HEALTH)
CITY MANAGER
DIRECTOR OF HEALTH I. I PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR
EMS
SANITARIAN DIRECTOR OF TRI-
CITY PUBLIC HEALTH LAB
7
O
PLAN DEVELOPMENT BY COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Only one of the six statutorily required yearly meetings of the
Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee has been held.to
date. See attached enclosure. According to June Schmidt, Council
member and local government member of the Advisory Committeer the direc-
tion from the Council to the Advisory Committee is to (1) update the
1977 public opinion questionnaire information summarized by the South
Hennepin Human Services Council in the 1977 Community Health Services
report and to (2) initiate other forms of community planning of the
Advisory Council's own choosing.
8
MINUTES OF EDINA ADVISORY HEALTH BOARD
MAY 24, 1977, 7:30 PM.
CONFERENCE ROOM
CITY HALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Van Valkenburg.
.
The following were in attendance: Dr. Duane Engstrom, Dr. Walter Krafft,
Dr. Richard Simmons, Mrs. Mary Bang, Mrs. Linda Bjerke, Mrs. Beverly Harris,
Dr. James Cardle, Mr. Verne W. Moss, Jr., Mrs. June Schmidt, Mr. Kenneth Esse,
Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Mrs. Tully Stoppel, Mrs. LaVonne Hargens and Mayor Van
Valkenburg.
The Mayor explained how commissions in the City of Edina, under Plan B
Government, work and indicated that the commissions are advisory in nature
and that the ultimate decisions and responsibility rest with the Council.
The procedure is for the commission to make recommendations to the Council,
either personally or through minutes and to then have the decision made by
the Council.
All meetings of the commission must be open to the public and minutes must
be kept.
Mrs. June Schmidt then discussed the history of the Act and Edina's involve-
ment therein and some of the public hearings held in connection with the
creation of the Health Board and the need for the same.
Mrs. LaVonne Hargens, from the Bloomington Health Clinic, discussed how it
operates and answered questions.from the members.
Dr. C. V. Rockwell was named as-Acting Chairman of the Commission.
Meetings are to be held on the first Tuesday of each month.
The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:15 p.m.
James vein valKenDUP9,
Acting Secretary,**'
9
As a result of the Community Health Services Act . passed by the Minnesota
Legislature in 1976, Edina has been awarded a subsidy of $79,258 for community
programs. To monitor the services a new health board has been formed.
The Edina Health.Board, which met for the first time May 24, is an
_advisory board to the Edina City Council, the official city health board.
The Community Health Services Act provides subsidies for county and
multi- county based community health service. Important to Edina residents
is that it is a direct service at the local level, designed to involve the
local public care needs, according to June_Schmidt,. city.council
member.
Edina was one of the five communities that qualified for the subsidy
when the law was passed. Besides Edina other qualifiers were Bloomington, St.
Louis Park, Richfield, and Minneapolis.
"Because we were able to allocate more, money into the public health
service through the subsidy, we were able to expand the Health Service Program
._..in Edina," Schmidt said.
Some of these services include:
Home care services, home nursing visits and physical therapy.
- Adult health service with immunization clinics, family planning,
venereal disease care, blood pressure checks, pap smears, and
breast examinations.
Child care services with early periodic screening, immunizations,
and well -child clinics:
Senior citizen service with immunization, TB tests, blood pres-
sure testing, nutrition classes and therapeutic help.
Schmidt said there will be a minimal charge for the available services.
Members of the new advisory board are Schmidt; Dr. C. V. Rockwell, city
health officer; Ken Esse, Edina sanitarian; Linda A. Bjerke; -Mary Bang; Dr.
Richard K. Simmons; Dr. Walter E. Krafft; Beverly Harris;. Dr. E. Duane
- Engstrom; Verne W. Moss, Jr.; Dr. James Cardle; and Tully Stoppel.
Taken from: Friday, May 27, 1977
Edina Sun
10
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES OF EDINA IN PROVIDING
HEALTH SERVICE NEEDS
The citizens of Edina through the Edina City Council, also presently
serving as the Edina Health Board, have been actively addressing the public
health needs of the city in its present form for more than two decades. The
City now has two full -time sanitarians and one part -time summer -employee
within its Health Department, a completely self- contained para - medics pro -
•gram- within- the- Depar.tment.- of. -Pub ,lic1Safety,_as well as-contracting with
Bloomington Public Health Nursing Service for its nursing health care needs.
Home Health Care. Community Nursing,. Disease Prevention and Control,
Health Education. In the early 1950's, the City of Edina contracted with
Suburban Public Health Nursing Service for the above services, continuing
to subscribe to this service through 1976. In 1977, the City began contracting
with Bloomington Public Health Nursing Service for the nursing needs in the
community. This nursing service represented an expansion of the Suburban
Public Health Nursing. Service in that it provided, and continues to provide,
clinics at different locations within Edina and, in addition, provides various
screening programs for all ages. The 1977 Community Health. Services subsidy
funds were used largely for purchasing additional services in this area in an
attempt to deliver better nursing health care service to the citizens of
Edina.
Environmental Health Services. In 1960, Edina, in cooperation with the
City of Richfield, hired an Environmental Health Sanitarian. This sanitarian
began working full time for Edina in 1964. The duties performed by the
sanitarian include food service inspection and licensing, water quality
monitoring, community sanitation, recreational area *sanitation, and nuisance
complaints.
In 1967, Edina, Bloomington, and St. Louis Park joined in forming the
Tri -City Public Health Laboratory. This laboratory performs chemical and
microbiological tests for the environmental health services.
Emergency Medical Services. In 1975, the City instituted an Emergency
Medical Services program'which is designed to aid the citizens and public with-
in Edina during sudden life, threatening situations caused by illness or
accidents. This service was initiated after an incident involving a- private
carrier when it was felt that the private carrier did not respond in suf
ficient time to the needs of the victim. The Emergency Medical Services of
the city are now equipped to treat and transport the sick and injured with
both ambulance and life support vehicles to the closest acute medical care
facility within the minimum period of time.
It is the intent of the Council to continue to re- evaluate and expand the
public health services of the community as the needs are assessed. .
11
COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE NEEDS IDENTIFIED
In May, David Velde, Assistant Sanitarian, conducted a study for the-City.
of Edina to determine the health needs of the City in an attempt to ascertain
whether the present use of funding under the Community Health Services Act,
passed in 1976, is meeting these needs and further to develop a set of,
specifications that can be used by the City in subsequent bids
of these services.
In carrying out this study four types of data were used. (1) Mortality
data from 1972 through 1974, published by the Metro Health Board was used
to determine the major causes of death in the area. This was then combined.
with the 1973 data from the U.S. Bureau of Vital Statistics which broke
this information down further so that a comparison could be made between
Edina and St. Louis Park, a similarly situated municipality; between.Edina
and the County of Hennepin; and between Edina and the State of Minnesota as
a.whole. (2) The Morbidity and Mortality Annual Summary,.published by the
Center. for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia was used to show the percentage
of change in reporting of selected notifiable diseases from 1966 to 1975..
Although the summary does not purport to.be all inclusive, it does give in-
sight into prevalent diseases that are a major factor in the delivery of health
care but are not reflected in mortality data because of their curative nature.
(3) Population data from 1975, published by the Metropolitan Council, was
used.to show a breakout of the percentage of elderly residents of the. cities
using Bloomington's Public Health Nursing Services, and finally, (4) Bloom-
ington's Public Health Nursing Services monthly printouts showing the break -
down of the services provided were examined to see if the services provided
corresponded with the data accumulated.
MORTALITY DATA. The mortality data in.Appendix 1 shows that in 1972. through
1974 the two predominant causes of death were ischemic heart and cerebrovas-
cular problems, both related to the circulatory system, with the leading cause
being heart related. These two causes of death constituted approximately 50%
of all deaths occurring in each of these three years. These types of diseases
are commonly associated with old age.
As shown in Appendix 2., an attempt was then made to determine how Edina compared
with the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, and the State. It was found
that the death rates in Edina for these causes of death were comparable to but
slightly lower than the corresponding city, county, and state figures. It
could be concluded that Edina's causal death rate is substantially similar to
the surrounding area as a whole.
MORBIDITY DATA. Another factor in health care is the incidence of disease
which does not result in death but provides a continuing. health need. In the
ten years preceding 1975, previously feared diseases such as polio and measles
became a lessening threat as innoculations became available to combat them,
as is shown in Appendix 3. Conversely, . the- incidence of veneral disease,
specifically gonorrhea, has increased until it tripled the rate of its nearest
rival disease in 1975. Increases in the incidence of disease probably in-
dicates that there is a need for services in the given area while decreases
in incidence of specific diseases probably indicates that effective measures
are being taken for adequate prevention of these diseases.. This will be ex-
amined more closely in the section dealing with services provided by the.
12
POPULATION. The 1975 population estimates of the Metropolitan Council show
that Edina has a higher population over 65 years of age than do the cities
of Bloomington and Richfield; who are also consumers of`the"Bloomington Public
Health Nursing Service. The percentage of population over 65 years of age
in- each- of_these cities is as follows:
Edina - 11.3%
Richfield - 8.3%
Bloomington - 3.9%
A historical examination of these three cities would indicate that Edina, as
the oldest of the suburban communities cited, would logically have a larger
proportion of elderly citizens to serve in its health care program. Appen-
dix 4 shows that the major age group using the Bloomington Public Health
Nursing Service (BPHNS) is the 65 and older age group. It is -interesting to
note that 11.3% of Edina's population account for 46.8% of the services of
BPHNS. This a number of questions. Does this mean that there is
greater need for Health care services among those 65 years of age or older?
Or does it mean that the BPHNS program is designed to emphasize the services
that this age group would use? What other factors affect the use of health
care services other than need? To what extent is lack of mobility, income,
alternative sources of service factors that affect this result? Ina study
conducted from social service data in the South Suburban Planning Area, it
was found that Edina had the highest case load of Adult Services, showing
170 .Edina adult service cases compared to 58 cases in Bloomington and 47 cases
in Richfield. It is not possible from the data available to resolve the above
questions to any degree of satisfaction. However, the available data does
indicate that Edina has a larger dependent adult population using health care
services relative to other consumers of BPHNS and that it directly correlates
with the population statistics'of the communities.
BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING. The programs that Edina receives through
BPHNS include Children's Health, Adult Health, Senior Center Health, Counsel-
ing, School Health, Home Nursing, and Public Information and Education.
Children's Health. The age group addressed in the Children's.Health
program ranges from birth through age 21 and accounts for.40% of the
population of Edina. The program is budgeted at $11,750, one third.
of the total disease prevention budget for 1977. The problems address-
ed in this program are early development, immunization, early and periodic
screening, health promotion and referrals. In referring back to
Appendix 3 , we find that diseases typically associated with this age
group are measles, pertussis, polio, and rubella. Pertussis and polio
have decreased substantially over the last decade. However, diptheria
is increasing. Measles and rubella have increased since 1974. These
items would be covered under.the Children's Health program and would
more than justify the existence of this program when one takes into
account.the probable longevity of the health care users and the recurr-
ing need for health care services if preventive measures are not taken
at this early stage.
13
Adult. Health. The age group addressed in the Adult Health Program range
from 20 through 64 years of age.and account for about 53 percent of the
population. The problems addressed in the adult. health program are
family planning, venereal disease clinics,.cancer screening, hyperten-
sion screening, immunizations, pregnancy diagnosis, health promotion
and referrals. The mortality data from enclosures 1 and 2 indicate there
may be a need for circulatory and cancer screening programs. With an
-- e- f- fective- screening- p.rogram,. the,,long tei7T effects as the result of these
diseases may be significantly altered. The adult health program accounts --
for $11,750, one third of the total disease prevention budget.
Senior Center Health Program. The problems addressed in the Senior. Center
Health program are nutrition, physical fitness, therapy, health mainten-
ance, early detection, blood pressure, well adult screening, counseling
and health education. The amount budgeted for this program is $11,750.
This accounts for the last third of the disease prevention money. About
66 percent of the total service can be identified with Senior Center Health,
when home nursing service is included. Although it cannot be realistically
expected that health care service in this age group will reduce the rate
of death, it still remains an important factor because it allows this
population group to continue to remain independently functioning for a.
longer period of time, reduces physical and emotional discomfort, and
potentially extends the longevity of the group.
To this point, there has not been a determination made of the portion of
the population which has not had access to the clinics. The 1970 census
data indicate that there are about 210 individuals in Edina that are handi-
capped and unable to work. A portion of this population probably cannot
care for themselves without additional assistance. An effort should be
made to see if the needs of this group are presently being met, and if not,
to determine how the service of BPHNS can be directed to more effectively
meet their needs.
CONCLUSION. We do not pretend that the above research represents a complete
and accurate survey of the needs of the residents of Edina for health care
services. Rather, it serves more of an indicator of the, general trends and
needs in the health care field and Edina's relationship o the larger health
community. We found that present data indicates that Edina's health care
needs are similar to those of other communities and that the health care ser-
vices appear to be needed by the older, more dependent adult population and,
pn the other end of the spectrum, by the younger,more dependent childhood
population. Factors that contribute to use of health care services by
these two groups are their dependency, their use of institutional facilities,
their lack of mobility, and their relatively lower income. We feel that
community. health care need studies should be continually made and critically
examined to assure that we are most effectively meeting the needs of the com-
munity. Alternative methods of study should be examined. Those potential
users of health care services, who are not readily discovered though statistical
studies, need to be discovered. Sources of communication should be utilized
in order to tap that portion of the population that has health care needs but
does not have regular access or contact with. public facilities.
14
15
STATUTES, GUIDELINES, AND MANUALS RELATED
TO FAMILY, MATER14AL AND CHILD HEALTH ACTIVITIES
SOURCE
1.
Family Planning State Plan - 5/74 (to be revised)
Minnesota Depart-
ment of Health
2.
Instruction Manual for Preschool and School_Hearing
Conservation - 1973; Instruction Manual for Pre -
school and School Vision Conservation - 1973 to
be revised)
"
3.
Early Detection of SCOLIOSIS by School Screening -
8/76
4.
Guidelines for Early Periodic Screening - Final
9/76 (0-21 years)
"
5.
Early Periodic Screening Manual - 8/76 (to be re-
vised)
n
6.
School Health Guide for Use in Minnesota Schools,
1973 (to be revised)
"
7.
Community Nursing Manual /Guidelines - November, 1974
"
8.
Immunization Clinic Manual and Guidelines - June,
1975
"
9.
Parent Education Guidelines (draft 461) 2/76
"
10.
EPS Cost Sharing Plan - 4/76
15
EDINA PROGRAMS
TITLE OF PROGRAM: .ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
-----Problems-Addressed.:—Problems addressed by this program include .food -borne
illnesses,
food service facility sanitation, community sanitation;-- recrea
tional sanitation, housing maintenance, and environmental pol-
lution control.
Diminished health may result from consuming food contaminated with.- chemi-
cals or microorganisms. Contamination.of foods may occur from unsanitary
conditions or improper handling during food manufacture, processing, delivery
or service. Some of the more common underlying causes of food -borne
disease outbreaks are inadequate refrigeration, poor personal hygiene,
failure to hold readily perishable foods at legal refrigeration tempera-
tures, failure to hold hot foods at legal holding temperatures and inade-
quate cooking.
Diminished health may result from exposure to hazards or conditions in the
physical environment of the community. Community sanitation covers a
variety of environmental problems which provide a link in the transmission
of disease in man. Included are problems related to rodent, insect, weed
control, improper refuse storage, animal control and a variety of public
health nuisances. Many sanitation problems are inter - related so that a
practical approach to control involves looking at the total community sani-
tation picture rather than each component separately.
Diminished health may result from improperly maintained recreational areas
such as swimming pools. If not properly maintained, accidental injury or
contamination may result for persons using the recreational facilities.
Diminished health may result from conditions of illnesses associated with sub-
standard housing. Although the total impact of substandard housing on
health cannot be fully determined, many researchers believe that the irrita-
tions and frustrations that occur in some residential environments are
leading or contributing factors of mental illness. Respiratory infections,
such as colds, bronchitis, and influenza, are related to inadequate heating .
of ventilation and inadequate and crowded sleeping arrangements. Digestive
tract diseases are usually related to crowding, inadequate water and
sewage facilities, multiple sleeping arrangements, and food handling
facilities. Other potential problems include carbon monoxide poisoning
due to faulty home heating devices, rodent and insect infestation, accidents
due to crowding, poor electrical connections, poor lighting and structural
problems.
Diminished health may result from exposure to polluted water or noise.
Water is used for a variety of activities and pollution of the water: may
effect wells, stormwater discharge and recreational areas.. The effects of
noise on the health of the population may be either of two types; (1) they
are consciously perceived effects or (2) insidious effects. Consciously
16
perceived effects are those recognized by the recipient or person. They
usually have a subjectively irritating or a nuisance character, but they
are nevertheless important functionally, producing such effects as inter -
ference with thought processes, communication disruption, performance im-
pairment, sleep disturbances and general mental stress. Excessive noise ran
also.result in permanent hearing loss.
Goals
Reduce ttfe= occurrence °of° public - health- hazar- ds -in=- the = commurity-- thro.ugh-the_,- -_ -.._
delivery of environmental health services.
Objectives
1. Prevent contamination, decomposition and-food-borne illness disease trans-
mission in food during production, processing, distribution, storage,
preparation and service.
2. Prevent the accumulations of refuse and weeds, destroy rodent and vermin
harborages and control domesticated animals that constitute a nuisance.
3. Prevent accidental injury or disease resulting from use of swimming
pools.
4. Prevent - irritants or impairments that may result from substandard or
overcrowded housing.
5. Eliminate the entrance of pollutants into surface or ground water.
6. Reduce the occurrence of unwanted noise in the community.
Methods: Specific methods used to achieve the objectives are:
0 Objective 1: Continue *routine inspections of food service facili-
ties to determine compliance with minimum public health standards.
Review all plans for proposed food service facilities to determine .
compliance with good processing practices. Investigate all reported
food -borne illnesses and recommend corrective actions to-prevent
future illnesses. Schedule educational seminars to inform the food
service personnel -of proper food handling procedures.
0 Objective 2: In response to complaints, investigate all community
sanitation nuisances and issue orders to correct situations which
are hazardous. Complete follow up inspections to determine compli-
ance with written orders.
a Objective 3: Continue routine inspections of swimming pools to de-
termine compliance with minimum health and safety standards. Issue
orders to correct any health or safety situation, and if necessary,
close the swimming pool to the public until necessary corrective
measures have been taken. Develop educational aids to assist swim-
ming pool operators in providing a safe and sanitary recreational
environment for the community.
17
0 Objective 4: In response to complaints or during periodic inspec-
tions, determine the conformity of housing with minimum housing
standards. Issue orders to correct unsafe or substandard conditions
and perform follow -up inspections to insure compliance with written
orders.
0 .Objective 5: Continue surveillance of on -site sewage disposal
systems. Wherever feasible, encourage conversion of on -site sew-
age disposal systems to sanitary sewer. Continue routine sampling
-__and surveillance of the city water supply Continue sampling indi-
vidual well water supplies as requested by the community. Continue
monitoring surface water.
0 Objective 6: In response to complaints, investigate all noise
nuisances and require compliance with accepted noise standards.
Projected Timetable
These programs are on -going and will continue throughout the year as scheduled
or as required.
Evaluation: Specific methods used to evaluate the objectives are:
® Objective 1: The schedule of routine inspections will be evaluated
by meeting the projected twice annual surveys for all food service
facilities. The performance of the plan review process will be eval-
uated by the promptness in which the plans are reviewed and by field
evaluations of the effectiveness of the reviewal process. The
actual performance of the inspection process will be evaluated by
certified inspectors from the State Department of Health. The cer-
tified inspectors will evaluate the interpretation and application
of the food code during periodic field visits. This evaluation
will also be carried through the administrative aspects of the in-
spection and enforcement process. The food -borne illness investiga-
tion process will be evaluated by reviewing the completeness and out-
come of the epidemiological investigation. The evaluation of the
food service educational program may not be measurable by any in-
cidence indicators. Therefore, the rate of occurrence of educational
seminars will be utilized to evaluate the - program.
0 Objective 2: The community sanitation will be evaluated by viewing
the effectiveness of abatement processes.
® Objective 3: The effectiveness of the swimming pool inspection pro-
gram will be evaluated. by meeting the monthly inspection schedule
and observing the expected results of no accidents or injury. If
for some reason, there is a deviation from the expected results, em-
phasis w -ithin the program will be re- assessed to cope with new
hazardous situations.
0 Objective 4: It is difficult to' measure the outcome of a housing
program, but with compliance with minimum housing codes there should
be an increase in the general welfare within the community. The
abatement of hazardous or unhealthy conditions in itself will be the
18
r
measure of the outcome, 'because the 'specific unhealthy or hazardous
condition will no longer be in existence.
0 Objective 5: The evaluation of the water pollution program will be
based on a reduction of'`the number'of on -site sewage disposal
systems, the prevention of contamination within the city water sup-
ply and the change in the quality of the surface water.
0 Objective 6: The abatement of an.unwanted noise source will result
in the reductiono° f-irritation- to- the-compla rant -. With - -this --=in
mind, the removal of unwanted noise should result in an improvement
in the quality of life within the community. Therefore, an evalua-
tion of the effectiveness of this program can be determined by the
number of noise problems successfully abated.
Summary Budget: At this time, the budget for the city programs has not been
submitted..
PROGRAM TITLE: PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORY (ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH)
Problems Addressed: Problems addressed by this program include food -borne
illness, food quality, water quality (public water supply, lakes, ponds,
and streams), air quality and miscellaneous analysis from all areas of en-
vironmental health.
Goals
Assist the Environmental Health Services in controlling the quality of food
and water thereby preventing adverse health conditions in the community.
Objectives
An the samples promptly and report the results to the appropriate En-
vironmental Health Service.
Methods
0 By using specific chemical and microbiological tests,,_ perform an-
alysis on samples submitted to the laboratory. All tests be 'per -.
formed using Standard Methods.
Evaluation
0 The laboratory and personnel performing the analysis must meet the
appropriate certification by the Minnesota Deparment of Health.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SENIOR CENTER HEALTH
Problems Addressed: According to the 1970 census, 8.0% of Edina's popula-
tion is 65 years of age and older. The aged'-are on fixed incomes and suffer
19
from various problems associated with old age. They may suffer from acute
or chronic conditions and in some cases are physically incapable of contact-
ing proper medical care personnel.
Goals
Establish and maintain the optimum level of health; physically and psycho -
socially.
Objectives
To offer senior health clinics and counseling that will provide services in
health promotion and health maintenance, early detection and referral for
treatment.
Methods: Specific methods to be used in achieving the objective are:
0 Individual and group counseling or teaching for physical fitness
and nutrition.
0 Blood pressure, well adult and screening clinics.
0 Therapeutic visits.
0 Emotional or mental health counseling.
0 Services will be provided by a Contract for Services Agreement and
by Paramedics.
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978., and
continue through December 31, 1978. .
T_- 1 -! __
0 A statistical record of visits will be required and used for compari-
son with previous records to evaluate the use and need for this pro-
gram.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: .ADULT HEALTH
Problems Addressed: According to the 1970 census date, 52.5% of Edina's
population are between 20 and 64 years of age. This group may for some
reason fail to seek and find or use appropriate preventative adult health
services.
Goals
Provide health services and supervision for well adults.
Objectives.
To offer adult health clinics thatwill provide services in health promotion,
early detection and referral for treatment.
20
Methods: Specific methods.to be used in achieving the objective are:
• Family planning clinic - contraceptions and pregnancy diagnosis.
• Venereal disease detection and treatment.
• Adult gynocological clinic, including cancer screening.
• Hypertension screening.
0 Adult immunization and tuberculin screening.
• All services will be provided for by a Contract for Services
Agreement.
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978, and
continue through December 31, 1978.
Evaluation
• A statistical record of visits will be required and reviewed for
comparison with previous records to evaluate the use and need for
this program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: CHILDREN'S HEALTH
Problems Addrgssed: According to the 1970 census data, a 39.5% of Edina's
population is under 20,years of age. Early diagnosis of apparent well
children may avert chronic problems that may arise in later life if not
treated properly.
Goals
Provide health supervision of well infants and children.
Objectives
To offer children's health clinics that will provide services in health
promotion, early detection, and referral for treatment.
Methods: The specific methods to be used in achieving the objective are:
• Well child clinics for children (birth - 6 months) to include
physicians physical assessment, health history, developmental
assessment dental observation, immunizations and family health
counseling.
• Early and periodic screening for children 6 months - 21 years.
• Home visits when indicated will be reflected in home nursing
indexes.
• Infant and child immunizations and tuberculin screening.
•' All services will be provided for by a Contract for Services Agree-
ment.
21
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978, and
continue through December 31, 1978.
Evaluation
0 A statistical record of visits will be required and used,for compari-
son with previous records to evaluate the use and need for this
program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: COUNSELING
Problems Addressed: Because of emotional problems, chemical dependencies
or emotional illness, individuals may suffer a diminished ability to cope with
stress and interpersonal relationships.
Goals
Optimum emotional health.
Objectives
Provide counseling, support, evaluation and referral for mental illness, emo-
tional problems and chemical dependencies to individuals and families.
Methods: Specific methods to be used in achieving the objective are:
0 Counseling by mental health counselors and psychiatric consultants.
0 Referrals to appropriate county or state agencies.
0 These services will be provided for by a Contract for Services
Agreement and by Youth Action.
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978, and
continue through December 31, 1978.
Evaluation
0 A statistical record of visits will be required and used for
comparison with previous records to evaluate the use and need for
this program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: SCHOOL HEALTH
Problems Addressed: According to the 1970 census data, 33% of Edina's popu-
lation is of school age. School children have numerous public health pro-
blems. This is the area where many communicable diseases are spread.
Goals
Provide child health supervision for the school age child within the school
22
setting.
Objective
Provide direct school nursing services to all private schools and consulta=
tive service to all public schools.
Methods: Specific methods to be used in achieving the objective are:
O Vision, hearing and scoliosis screening.
• Individual health counseling and teaching.
• Assessment of physical and emotional status in cooperation with
school staff and appropriate referral.
• These services will be provided for by the Contract for Services
Agreement.
Projected Timet?ble
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978, and con-
tinue through December 31, 1978.
Evaluation
0 A statistical record of visits will be required and used to compare
with previous records to evaluate the use and need for this
program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: HOME NURSING
Problems Addressed: According to the 1970 census data, there are over 200
persons in'Edina who are disabled and unable to work. This population group
also may have difficulty in managing their personal health concerns or act-
ivities of daily living.
Goals
Enable individuals to live a more satisfying and healthful life in their
home environment when appropriate.
Objective
Provide professional home health services to individuals and families.
Methods: Specific methods to be used in achieving this objective are:
i Home visits will be provided by professional nurses at all lev-
els of preparedness and home health aids.
• Encourage referrals through continual outreach with appropriate
resources.
i' Provide visits for both illness and health promotion.
23
0 When indicated, the services of physical therapy; speech thera-
py, occupational therapy or medical social services will be
arranged.
0 All requirements for Title XVIII Home Health Providers will
be maintained..
0- Services will be provided by a Contract for Services Agreement.
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978, and
continue tarough December 31,1978. =g"
Evaluation
4 A statistical record of visits will be required and used to com-
pare with previous records to evaluate the use and need.for this
program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: PUBLIC INFORMATION AND EDUCATION
Problems Addressed: Many disabling or chronic health problems can be averted
by practicing good preventive health measures.
Goal
Encourage positive health practice through individual and group health edu-
cation.
Objective
Extend health education opportunities to citizens through direct service and
assist organizations in program development.
Methods: Specific methods to be used in achieving the objective are:
0 Provide a Public Health Nurse- Educator'to develop and implement
health educatiopal programs.
0 Utilize the agency professionals as speakers within their speci-
alty.
0 Provide outreach to local schools, churches, and community
organizations.
0 Have literature available to advise one of positive health
practices.
0 Have information available on existing resources.
0 Services will be provided by a Contract for Services Agreement
and Youth Action.
Projected Timetable
The contract will require services begin on or about January 1, 1978,'and
continue - through December 31,. 1978.
24
Evaluation
0 A statistical record of visits will be required and used to com-
pare with previous records to evaluate.the use and need for
this program.
TITLE OF PROGRAM: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
Problems Addressed: Sudden life threatening situations such as accidents
are a constant threat to the health of the citizens within the community.
The morbidity and mortality associated with these situations can effective-
ly be altered by quick, professional delivery to a health care facility.
Goals
1. Provide ambulance service for the sick and injured.
2. Provide emergency medical treatment for the sick and injures.
Objectives
1. Provide one advanced life support emergency ambulance, staffed by para-
medics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT's).
z. Provide a back -up ambulance staffed by EMT's.
3. Provide cardio- pulmonary resuscitation classes for various groups in .
the city of Edina.
Methods
0 The Fire Department shall have six personnel trained as para-
medics, with two assigned to each shift.
0 There shall be no less than one paramedic on duty at a time.
0 All Fire Department personnel shall be trained as EMT's and
assist the paramedics as necessary.
0 All Police Department patrolmen shall be trained as EMT's and
assist the Fire Department as necessary.
Evaluation
0 The City of Edina will be a member of the Hennepin County
Emergency Medical Services, who will review the training,
methods, procedures and equipment used by the City of Edina
for providing emergency medical services.
Timetable
This program is in effect now and will be on- going. Services will be pro-
vided as needed.
25
CHS ACTIV17v OETA!L
P_tcotn: ( ) Hcne Health Services Activitu- Ti,ti:_•
( ) Community Nursing Services Sudne,t Petied: to
( ) Disease Preverit:en I Control Services ------- - - - - --
( ) Emercency Medical Services Acti.vi,tu C._Lteat!tu: (if the funds are
( ) Health Educatien (including nutrition to be used 'or more than one catecory,
and dental public health) indicate percent of funds in each)
( .) Environmental Health Services
( ) Family Planning Services ( ) Maintenance
( ) Expansion
( ) New
• • • t t • • t t • • t i • t • t ♦ r w ,t t * • w ♦ t t w • • • * • • t • • # • • • s • ,► t •
f duage-el7
t
Exoenditures CHS runes Loca
Cost atecories Recuested Parti ci oati on -Total
c
1. Personnel (itemize number of full -time
equivalents, salary, and fringe)
(The 1978 Budget is not yet ava Table)
s .
a ,
l
2. Travel
3. Supplies
4. Patient Care
S. Contractual Services
6. Equipment
7. Other (specify)
TOTAL
26
-Othe r
Party
State-
Reim-
Ibursementl
_ PavP^.9
CHS-
Local
Fees
Federal
Private
Total
Total F,,nas
I
(
I
I
f duage-el7
t
Exoenditures CHS runes Loca
Cost atecories Recuested Parti ci oati on -Total
c
1. Personnel (itemize number of full -time
equivalents, salary, and fringe)
(The 1978 Budget is not yet ava Table)
s .
a ,
l
2. Travel
3. Supplies
4. Patient Care
S. Contractual Services
6. Equipment
7. Other (specify)
TOTAL
26
or the Period From __ January 1. 1977 To _ December 31 1977
If Budget Check One: New,( ) Revision (x) ;)
lame and Address of Applicant: City of Edina
4805 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 (The 1973 Budget is not available yet.)
1. Financial Summary - To be completed for Budget and Expenditure Report
Activity
Environmental
Health Services
Disease Prevention
Nursing Services
Home tlealth
Health Education
Emergency
Medical Services
Other
TnTAf
Budget Amount Expenditure Amount Outstanding Obligations
Local Participation , Subsidy Total Local Participation Subsidy Total Local Participation Subsidy Total
61,000 4,000 65,000
8,000 27,250 35,250
7,500 1 7,500 15,000
8,000
20,500
28,500
6,300-
3,750
10,050
151,000
16,000
167,000
_
241,800
79,000 (320,800
11. Summary of Cash Transactions — Expenditures Report — MHD Subsidy Funds Only.
A. Enter Transaction number of last warrant received from MHD
B. Cash Received to Date
C. Less: Total Expenditures to Date
D. Cash Balance •.
111. Amount of local match funds used to match directly awarded federal programs $
IV. Certification (Signatures)
1 certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief the data reported above is correct and that all transactions were made
in accordance with subsidy provision and applicable assurances.
Authorized Official _ Date
IS,gnaturel
Fiscal Manag,!ment Officer _ _ -_.. _ _ _ Date
I us 11n tar uau ...ny. -
Subsidy No.
Source of Funds
Grant Number
TRAN I VENDOR-NUMBER ITYP
INVOICE NUMBER ORGANIZATION
.P
AMOUNT OF INVOICE DATE UBACT TASI
U13 TASK COST /CLIENT CODE FED REV
I hereby certify that the goods or materials covered by thie
claim have bean inspocted and received or the services havt
bean purformud, and are in accordance with specil,cations
and are in form, kind, amount, aeW quality, and paymew
tharnfnr Is harebv racornn,endud.
PERSONNEL DESCRIPTION
pnognam: ( ) Hoge Health Services ( ) Emefgency Medical Services
- -- ( ) Community Nursing ( ) Health Education
( ) Disease Prevention & Control (x) Environmental Health
pods Lion Title:
-------- - - - - --
Director, Health Department
Genenea e_DeA.iyu lion:
Plan, implement, supervise, and administer various municipal public health.
programs.
Vatieh: .
Coordinate work activities with other departments.
Prepare, submit and justify the public health budget to supervisor.
Keep informed of new developments in the field of public health.
Provide technical assistance for subordinates.
Determine objectives and priorities for the department.
Education SUM:
Baccalaureate degree in Biological or Chemical Sciences and on- the -job experi-
ence in a public health related field.
Continuing education in new developments.
•28
PERSONNEL DESCRIPTION
Ngnam: ( ) Home Health Services ( ) Emeggency Medical Services
-- ( ) Community Nursing ( ) Health Education
( ) Disease Prevention & Control (x) Environmental Health
Po,6iti,.on T.i tCe:
Sanitarian
GeneAeaZ- Ve4.ini ti.on:
Perform field inspections, write reports and orders and enforce minimum public
health crdinances.
DutieA :
Food establishment inspections.
Food -borne illness investigation.
Swimming pool inspection and consultation.
Plan review consultation.
Air pollution investigation.
Housing investigation.
Noise Monitoring.
Community sanitation enforcement.
Education SF.UL6 :
Baccalaureate degree or equivalent.
Practical experience in area of above - described duties.
Continuing education in-new developments.
29
:
PERSONNEL DESCRIPTION
pnognam: ( ) Home Health Services ( ) Emergency Medical"Services
Community Nursing ( ) Health Education
( ) Disease Prevention & Control W Environmental Health
Po,6iti,on T.i tee:
-------- - - - - --
Director, Tri -City Public Health Lab
GeneAw De nn:
This position involves the chemical and microbiological testing of food and.
water samples for the Health Departments of Bloomington, Edina, and St. Louis
Park.
Duties:
Routine checks on the municipal water supplies as required by law.
Routine microbiological examination of foods from public eating establishments.
Investigation of foods suspected of causing food poisoning outbreaks.
Testing lakes and creeks for pollution.
Order needed equipment, chemicals and biologicals.
Plan sampling schedules for the three municipalities and coordinate testing.
Plan for new equipment and maintenance of old.
Education Sh-WA :
Baccalaureate degree or equivalent with strong background in natural sciences.
Previous experience in laboratory performing microbiological and chemical test-
ing.
Working knowledge and experience in' public 'health field.
,Continuing education in new developments..
30
PERSONNEL DESCRIPTION
Pnognan: ( ) Home Health Services (X) Emergency Medical Services
Community Pursing ( ) Health Education
Disease Prevention & Control ( ) Environmental Health
Poziti.on T.itte: Director of Public Safety
'Genwat De4init ion: This position is the Chief Administrator of the Police Department,
Fire Department, and Building Inspection Department, and reports directly to the City
Manager. The general functions and activities involve management planning, organizing,
staffing, directing; coordinating, reporting,-and budgeting.
Vutiez: In general -, the Director's duties and responsibilities are:
1. To provide a single contact point and act as administrator for Department of Public
safety matters of interest to the Council or City Manager.
2. To provide coordination among Police, Fire, and Building Inspection Departments in
areas of overlapping responsibilities and mutual interest.
3. To assist Police, Fire, and Building Inspection management and supervisors in dealing
with particularly troublesome or complex administrative, personnel, and managerial
problems and undertakings.
4. To provide interface with other departments, (e.g., Health, Engineering, and Public
Education Sh.,c,_&5 : works) .
1. Bachelor's Degree or equivalent, along with a strong background in supervision,
organization, and management.
2. Specialized courses in police administration.
3. 'Specialized courses in fire administration.
4. Architectural, engineering, or equivalent background, such as being a certified.*
State Building Official.
* Para - medics and Emergency Medical Services are a function of the Police and Fire
Departments.
31
DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Nature of Work: This position is the Chief Administrator of the Police Department,
Fire Department, and Building Inspection Department, and reports directly to the City
Manager. .The general functions and activities involve management planning, organizing,
staffing, directing, coordinating, reporting, and budgeting.
Examples of Work Performed: In general, the Director's duties and responsibilities are:
1. To provide a single contact point and act as administrator for Department of Public
safety matters of interest to the Council and City Manager.
_ 2. To provide coordination among Police, Fire, and Building Inspection Departments in
areas of overlapping responsibilities and mutual interest.
3. To assist Police, Fire, and Building Inspection management and supervisors in dealir
with particularly troublesome or complex administrative, personnel, and managerial
problems and undertakings. .
4. To provide interface with other departments, (e.g., Health, Engineering, and Public
Works).
Desirable Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities:..
1. A Police and /or Fire Department background.
T 2: Ability to provide leadership and direction within a management team and establish
a working environment which is conducive to the best performance by people.
Desirable Experience and Training:
1. Supervisory experience in Police and /or
2. Middle management experience in Police
3. Architectural, engineering, or building
4. Knowledge in Police, Fire, and Building
5. Knowledge in supervision and management
Fire Department.
ind /or Fire Department.
construction background,
Inspection Administration,
of-people and resources.
Minimum Requirements:
1. Bachelor's Degree or equivalent, along with a strong background in supervision,.
organization, and management.
2. Specialized courses in Police Administration.
3. Specialized courses in Fire Administration.
4. Architectural, engineering, or equivalent background, such as being certified
as a State Building Official.
32
Cause of Death
1. Ischemic Heart
2. Cerebrovascular
3. Residual, Other Diseases
4. Accidents (all) .
5. Digestive Neoplasms
6. Breast Neoplasms
7. Leukemia
8. Suicide
9. Respiratory Neoplasms
10. Pneumonia
All Other Causes
LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN 1974
COMPARED TO 1973 AND 1972
1974
No. of Total % of Total
Deaths
Deaths
95
32
57
19.2
17
5.7
14
4.7
13
4.4
11
3.7
10
3.4
9
3.0
8
2.7
7
2.4
56
18.8
297 100.0
1973
No. of Total % of Total
Deaths
Deaths
89
30.3
44
15.0
10
3.4
12
4.1
18
6.1
7
2.4
2
0.7
5
1.7
8
2.7
8
2.7
91
30.9
294 - 100.0
Appendix 1
1972
No. of Total % of Total
Deaths
Deaths
102
37.2
37
13.5
14
5.1
9
3.3
14
5.1
10
3.6
2
0.7
5
1.8
13
4.7
3
1.1
65
23.9
274 100.0
Cn
Taken from Vital Statistics of the United States, 1973, Volume II - Mortality Part B. Based on
1969 data.
34
Appendix 2
Mortality due to causes for the City
of Edina,
State of
Minnesota, St. Louis
Park, and Hennepin
County. The rate is expressed per
1,000 population based on an
48,883,
Edina population of
and Hennepin County
44,046,
popula-
state population of 3,804,971, St.
Louis Park population of
tion of 960,000 for 1970.
St. Louis
CAUSE
Edina
(Rate)
Minnesota
(Rate) Henn. Cty.
(Rate)
Park
(Rate)
Infection /Parasitic
1
( .02)
174
( .05)
49
( .05)
5
( .10)
Malignant Neoplasms
68
(1.55)
6,174
(1.62)
1,546
(1.61),
62
(1.27)
Digestive Organs
18
( .40)
1,800
( .47)
(
429
0313
( .45)
( .33)
14
14
( •29)
( .29)
Respiratory
8
7
( .18)
( .16)
1,084
599
.29)
( .16)
173
( .18)
12
( .25)
Breast
Genital
14
( .32)
839
( .22)
171
( .18)
3
( .06)
Urinary
3
( .07)
291
( .08)
63
( .07)
(
1
1
( .02)
( .02)
Leukemia
2
16
( .05)
( .36)
288
1,271
( .08)
( .33)
65
331
.07)
( .34)
.17
( .35)
Other
Diabetes
3
( .07)
542
( .14)
127
( .13)
5
( .10)
Cardiovascular
153
(3.48)
18,429
(4.85)
4,111
(4.28)
172
(3.52)
98
(2.23)
12,964
(3.41)
2,871
(2.99).
122
(2.50)
Heart
Rheumatic Fever
4
( 109)
259
( .07)
66
( .07)
3
( .06)
Hypertensive Heart
1
( .02)
163
( .04)
26
( .03)
0
(0.00)
Ischemic Heart
87
(1.98)
11,854
(3.12)
2.658
(2.77)
113
(2.31)
Other Heart
6
( .14)
688
( .18)
121
( .13)
6
( .12)
Hypertension
1
( .02)
113
( .03)
30
( .03)
2
( .04)
Cerebrovascular
45
(1.02)
4,225
(1.11)
.950
( .99)
36
( .74)
Arteriorsclerosis
6
( .14)
639
( .17)
134
( .14)
4
( .08) '
Other diseases of arteries
3
( .07)
488
( .13)
126
( .13)
8
( .16)
Influenza/Pneumonia
9
( .20)
1,284
( .34)
258
( .27)
12
( .25)
Bronchitis
5
( .11)
466
( .12)
95
( .10)
3
( .06)
Peptic Ulcer
1
( :02)
129
( .03)
30
( .03)
2
( .04)
Cirrhosis of Liver
2
( .05)
401
( .11)
. 127
( .13)
1L
( .08)
Nephritis/Nephrosis
1
( .02)
86
(..02)
21
( .02)
1
( .02)
Congenital Anomalies
2
( .05)
252
( .07)
56
( .06)
1
( •02)
Early Infancy
4
( .09)
447•
( .12)
89.
( .09)
1
( .02)
Symptoms & Illness, Ill De-
1
(
264
( .07)
135
( .14)
9
X18)
fined
.02)
All Other Diseases
20
( .45)
2,443
( .64)
612
( .64)
29
( .S9)
Accidents
6
(
1,048
( .28)
145
( .15)
6
( .12)
Motor vehicle
Accidental
7
.14)
•( .16)
1,072
( .28)
220
( .23)
6
( .12)
(
Suicide
5
( .11)
410
( 111)
127
( .13)
9
.18)
All Other external causes
2
( .05)
99
( .03)
30
( .03)
1
( .02)
Taken from Vital Statistics of the United States, 1973, Volume II - Mortality Part B. Based on
1969 data.
34
•
Appendix 3
PERCENT OF CHANGE IN PXPORTING OF
SELECTED NOTIFIABLE DISEP.SES
1966 - 1975
..Hepatitus A
+
9.1%
Salmonella
+
34.3%
Shi.gella
+
39.54
Trichinosis
+
74.8%
Typhoid Fever
-
0.8%
Syphilis
-
23.6%
Gonorrhea
+184.3%
Botulism
+
88.9%
Measles ( Rubeola)
-
88.1 (up 10.3% from 1974)
Diptheria
+
26.9%
Pertussis
-
77.5% ,
Poliomyelitis
-
92.9%
Rubella
-
64.6 (up 39.7% frog*. 1974)
*Taken from "Morbidity and Mortality Annual
Summary," 1975.
35
RANKING OF EDINA POPULATION
(1970 CENSUS)
Appendix 4
RANKING OF AGE GROUP USING BPHNS
JANUARY - MARCH, 1977
RANKING OF USE, BPHNS SERVICE
Reason for-Visit % of
Total Visits
No. in Total
% of Total
23.2
2.
% of Total .
% of Total
Age Group
Population
Population
Age Group
Edina Population
Using 3PHNS
1.
10 -14
5,522
12.5
1.
65+
8.0
46.8
2.
5 -9
4,587
10.4
2.
.20 -44
28.2
24.2
3.
15 -19
4,431
10.1
3.
5 -19
33.0
15.3
4.
65+
3,505
8.0
4.-
-.45-64
24.3
6.5
5.
45 -49
3,377
7.7
5.
1 -4
plasms
4.0
2.7
10.
Pneumonia
7
2.4
6.5
56
6.
40 -44
3,232
7.3 _
.6.
0 -1
3.2
7.
50 -54
3,138
7.1
100.0
100.0
8.
35 -39
2,974
6.8
9.
0 -4
2,866
6.5
10.
55 -59
2,487
5.6
11.
30 -34
2,386
5.4
12.
25 -29
1.946
4.4
13.
20 -24
1,873
4.3
' 14.'60
-64
1,707
3.9
•
44,031
100.0
JANUARY - MARCH, 1977
RANKING OF USE, BPHNS SERVICE
Reason for-Visit % of
Total Visits
1.
Arthritis
23.2
2.
Cardiovascular
11.2
3.
Stroke
9.0
4.
Family Planning
6.3
19.2
Emotional Health
6.3
5.
Multiple Sclerosis
5.9
6.
Cancer
5.7
7.
Diabetes
4.7
4.7
Neurology
4.7
8.
Early- Periodic Scrng.
2.9
9.
Genitourinary
2.9
10.
Alcohol
2.6
11.
Metabolic Disorders
1.6
10
All others
10.4
Suicide
9
100.0
CAUSES OF DEATHS IN EDINA
(VITAL STATISTICS, 1974)
rw
.. Number of
% of Total
Cause of Death
Deaths
Deaths
1.
Ischemic Heart
95
32
2.
Cerebrovascular
.57
19.2
3.
Residual, Other
Diseases
17
5.7
4.
Accidents (All)
14
4.7
5.
Digestive Neo-
plasms
13
4.4
6.
Breast Neoplasms
11
3.7
7.
Leukemia
10
3.4
8.
Suicide
9
3.0
9.
Respiratory Neo-
plasms
8
2.7
10.
Pneumonia
7
2.4
All.others
56
18.8
297
100.0
36
rw
itro ®titan Area Management Prfociatio� e
of the Twin City Area
June 3, 1977
TO: M.A.M.A. Stanton Group V
Communities with Police
Represented by I.B.T., Local No. 320
FROM: Harlyn Larson, Chairman
M.A.M.A. -320 Police Negotiating Committee
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION FOR REPRESENTATION IN JOINT
POLICE NEGOTIATIONS
Enclosed is an Authorization for Representation in Joint Police Negotiations
for a Contract Beginning 1978 with Teamsters, Local No. 320. These Authorization
for Representation forms are sent out to ascertain the degree of interest in
joint police negotiations for the contract year beginning 1978. We also request
that you list at the bottom any additional management demands you would like
included in the negotiations. The deadline for returning this form is:
Wednesday, June 22
If authorization cannot be processed through your council by that time would
you send along your management demands and indicate that approval is /is not
forthcoming..
Please return this form and your management demands as soon as possible to:
Labor Relations Associates
303 Hanover Building
480 Cedar Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101
HGL:hfc
Encl.
James G. Willis, President Carsten D. Lelkvold, Secretary
3025 Harbor Lane, Plymouth, MN 55441 14600 Minnetonka Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55343
(612)559.2800 (612) 933 -2511
4 ` k
AUTHORIZATION FOR REPPISENTATION IN JOINT POLICE NEGOTIATIONS
FOR A CONTPACT YEAR BEGIN LING 1970" :':ITH TEAP.1ZTEPS, LOCAL #320
1. The municipality of (name) hereby
(authorizes , does not authorize ,)
the committee which has been established by MAMA with Harlyn Larson
as Chairman to serve as its representative in police negotiations
with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters..
2. If you have authorized representation of your municipality by the
committee in #1, in what capacity do you wish to be represented?
a. Wage negotiations for the top patrol officer.
b. Negotiations for the master contract.
c. Both "a" and "b ".
NOTE: Articles on fringe benefits will be written on a local basis after
agreement has been reached on the master contract. Negotiations for
changes-in fringe benefits, if any, will be conducted locally at that
time. Therefore; the committee is not requesting authority from mun-
icipalities to negotiate such benefits.
Signed (City Manager)
Date
MANAGEMENT DEMANDS TO BE INCLUDED IN NEGOTIATIONS (list below, use reverse side
If additional space is needed
June 17, 1977
MDIORAN DUM
TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Planning Director
SUBJECT: Ryan Construction Company Proposal for
Income Family Units and Establishment
District in Southeastern Edina
Vi C_
80 Low and Moderate
of a Tax Increment Financing
Some time ago, Ryan Construction Company obtained preliminary approval from the
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for the construction of 80 subsidized family
townhouse units. These units are proposed for a ten -acre tract of land in the
northeast quadrant of York Avenue and W. 76th Street. Ryan Construction has
also requested that the City of Edina participate in the project by "writing
down" the cost of the ten -acre tract of land on which the project will be
located. Such a land write -down is necessary to provide rental costs which are
Uelow the maximum level required for low and moderate income housing.
The City of Edina's Housing Assistance Plan identifies the 76th and York location
as an area suitable for the construction of low and moderate income housing.
The Housing Assistance Plan also notes that this area could be established as a
tax increment financing district for the purpose of reducing land costs in order
to facilitate such construction.
Based on the Housing Assistance Plan as well as the Ryan Construction proposal,
staff has been exploring methods of establishing a tax increment financing
district in Southeastern Edina. Staff has determined that a tax increment
district established and administered by an H.R.A. would be the proper financing
procedure for this area.
Pursuant to the City Council's June 13, 1977, request, staff has prepared three
generalized alternatives for a tax increment district.(attached). These
alternatives illustrate the proposed size of the district, the very roughly
estimated net costs of the project, the project elements (results) which could
be accomplished, and the approximate time required to finance the project.
Professional Management Services, Inc., represented by Greg Luce, has been
retained by Ryan Construction Company to assist in the preparation of the tax
increment district. Although the original tax increment district concept
anticipated by the developer may be enlarged, Ryan Construction Company has
authorized their consultant to prepare and /or assist with the preparation of plans
and documents necessary to establish the district. Costs to the City for
district establishment would primarily include legal services and printing costs.
Recommendation: At this time, staff requests some direction on the following
items:
1.. Which tax increment financing district alternative, if any, should be
pursued?
6 -17 -77 Memo
Page 2
2. Should we proceed with plan preparation for a particular alternative?
Plan preparation includes a problem assessment, findings of blight,
development program, financial program, relocation and acquisition plans,
and implementation plans.
3. Should the existing H.R.A. be involved with thi-s program or will the City
Council assume the responsibilities of the H.R.A. prior to the formal establish-
ment of the district? If the existing H.R.A. will consider the program, the
Council should adopt a resolution directing the H.R.A. to undertake the
program.
GH:ln
cc Mayor and City Council
I "C�
ALTERNATIVE 1
PROJECT COST: $354,000
RESULTS: 80 unit family project
Sidewalk along York Avenue
Traffic signals - 76th and York Avenue
PROJECT PAID: 1981
r�
1
�� I1 ; I ` •�
_
r
• • 0�1
ALTERNATIVE 2
PROJECT COST: $1,000,000
RESULTS: 80 unit family project
50 unit family project
100 unit elderly project
10 -acre owned site (assume no tax revenue)
Sidewalk along York Avenue
Traffic Signals - 76th and York
Assessment Relief - York Avenue
Park Improvements - York Park
• PROJECT PAID: 1982
%: mil' • • �� � � ��
V ♦ T
y.
i
• ALTERNATIVE 3
PROJECT COST: Variable $1,600,000 - $3,000,000
RESULTS: 80 unit family project
50 unit family project
100 unit elderly project
10 -acre non -park public property, 100 acres
partial control
Sidewalk along York Avenue
Traffic Signals - 76th and York
Assessment Relief - York Avenue
Park Improvements - York Park
Parklawn Avenue extended
France Avenue controlled
Improved Signalization, France Avenue
76th Street Park - Acquisition and Development
PROJECT PAID: 1982 to 1989 depending on tax exempt land
CITY OF EDINA
Horizon Agency BHK&R
General Liability * 58,707 -H.
Para- Medics * 1,229 -W
Police *. 4,548 -Ap
Auto Liability * 24,435 -H
Wood- Nelson
GJ iquor Liability *- 23,396 -H 21,052 -OM 21,052 -OM`
Umbrella Liability 52,200 -IN.- * 47,532 -I
Auto Physical Damage * 7,779 -H
Mobile Equipment * 3,833 -H 4,770 -A
Fine. Arts * 32 -H 45 -A
Business Interruption * 852 -H 931 -S
Money & Securities _ 1,822 -H
Worker's Compensation 110,745 -P
*
124,811
H - Home Insurance Company
W Western World Insurance Company
Ap - Appalachian Insurance Company
OM - Occidental Fire and Casualty Company and
Midland Insurance Company
IN - Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company
I - Interstate Fire and Casualty Company
A - AEtna Insurance Company
S - St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company
Ha - Hartford Fire Insurance Company
E - Employers Mutual Insurance Company
P - Assigned Risk Pool
* 1,519 -Ha
* 110,745 -E _
* 159,796
137tU 0 . �E Lht�;t, CPCU
INSURANCE CONSULTANT
June 15, 1977
Mr. J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Minn. 55424
INSURANCE QUOTATIONS
400 BUILDERS EXCHANGE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE ( 612 ) 336 -5866
As suggested, Jerry, we have made a careful analysis of all
the bids received in response to the invitation to bid
contained in specifications which were distributed some- •
time ago.
Despite tha fact that specifications were requested by ten
or more different agencies, bids were received from only
three agencies and no one insurance company was willing to
submit quotations on all the forms of insurance for which
rids were invited. The Horizon Agency, Inc. submitted the
only,bid on behalf of the Home Insurance Company for compre-
hensive general liability insurance, automobile liability
insurance and automobile physical damage insurance. Two
other agencies submitted quotations for some of the other
forms of insurance for which bids were requested.
Our analysis of all the bids which were received is "enclosed,
along with our recommendations for your consideration. :.f
any further information would be helpful, we would be glad to
review the recommended insurance program, as well as the bids,
in more detail.
Yours ve Ay truly,
FRED G. GEDELMAN
FGG:pab
Enclosures
.... ,"
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE
The only bid received for General Liability Insurance was from
the Horizon Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance Company.
The quotation is based on a limit of liability for personal
injury and property damage of $500,000. If the Home Insurance
Company writes the Worker's Compensation Insurance the annual
premium for General Liability Insurance would be $73,288 and
if the Worker's Compensation Insurance is placed in the Assigned
Risk Pool the annual premium would be $58,707. Both of these
premiums would be subject to adjustment after one year based
on the annual City payroll. This quotation is based on the
assumption that the Liquor Liability Insurance will also be
written by the Home Insurance Company.
The General Liability Insurance quotation on behalf of the
Home Insurance Company does not include coverage for claims
made against individual law enforcement officers or against
ambulance drivers and ambulance attendants although the
insurance will respond to claims against the City of Edina
resulting from activities of persons in these classifications,
including claims for activities where incidental malpractice
is alleged. The Home Insurance Company will not provide
individual coverage for law enforcement officers, ambulance
drivers or ambulance attendants.
The Horizon Agency has submitted a bid on behalf of the Western
World Insurance Company to provide liability insurance that
would respond to a claim aga-inst any of'the six paramedics who
are ambulance drivers or ambular_ce.attendants for a limit of
$250,000 any one claim and $500,000 annual aggregate limits for
an annual premium-of $1,229. There were no other quotations
submitted for this coverage.
The Horizon Agency has submitted a bid on behalf of the
Appalachian Insurance Company under their master policy covering
members of the National Sheriffs Association which provides
professional liability for law enforcement officers with limits
of $250,000 per person and $500,000 per occurrence. The
anniversary date of this master policy is October 31, 1977 and
the premium for four months from July 1, 1977 to October 31, 1977
is $1,516. This coverage will have to be renegotiated prior
to the October 31, 1977 expiration date.
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE
ti
The only bid received for Automobile Liability Insurance was
from the Horizon Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance Company.
The quotations are based on Bodily Injury limits of
$300,000/500,000 and Property Damage limit of $100,000 and
Uninsured Motorist limit of $25,000/50,000. This insurance
will include.the basic Personal Injury Protection (No Fault)
as required by statute.
If the Home Insurance Company writes the Worker's Compensation
Insurance the annual premium for Automobile Liability Insurance
would be $34,425 based on a rate of. $255 per vehicle for
135 vehicles. If the Worker's Compensation Insurance is placed
in the Assigned Risk Pool the rate would be $181 per vehicle or
an annual premium of $24,435.
LIQUOR LIABILITY INSURANCE
Three agents submitted quotations for Liquor Liability
Insurance. The Horizon Agency quotation on behalf of the
Home Insurance Company which provides limits.of $500,000
specifies an annual premium of $23,396 based on a rate of
.60 per $100 of sales.
The Wood - Nelson Company and Brandow, Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom, Inc.
both submitted identical quotat3. ,,-," on behalf of the Occidental
Fire and Casualty Company writing primary limits of $50,000/
100,000/50,000 and the Midland Insurance Company writing excess.
limits of $450,000/400,000 /450,000, so the total limit provided
by both companies is the same as the limits quoted on behalf
of the Home Insurance Company.. These quotations develop an
annual premium of $21,052 which is subject to audit and adjustment
based on sales at a rate of .5239.
The premium quotations from Wood- Nelson Company and Brandow,
Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom are $2,344 less than the quotation
from the Horizon Agency; however, the Horizon Agency quotation
on behalf of the Home Insurance Company contemplates that the
General Liability, the Automobile Liability and the Liquor
Liability will all be written in the same policy. If the Home
Insurance Company does not include the Liquor Liability in their
coverage, their quotation for General Liability would be at
least $6,000 higher than the amount quoted.
If possible, the Liquor Liability and the General Liability
insurance should be written by the same company because in some
cases it may not be easy to determine whether an accident or
injury would fall in the Liquor. Liability or General*Liability
coverage part. Any possible disagreement between insurance
companies would be avoided if both coverages are in the same
company. It is, therefore; recommended that the Liquor Liability
be written by the Home Insurance Company.
UMBRELLA EXCESS LIABILITY
Two quotations for Umbrella Excess Liability with a limit of
$3,000,000 excess of the limits provided by the primary
policies. Horizon Agency quoted an annual premium of $52,200
on behalf of-the Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company and
the Wood - Nelson Company quoted an annual premium of $47,532 on
behalf of the Interstate Fire and Casualty. Because of the
difference in cost the proposal of the Wood - Nelson Company on
behalf of the Interstate Fire and Casualty Company is
recommended. '
• n
5
i
i
F
i
AUTOMOBILE PHYSICAL DAMAGE INSURANCE
(Fire, Theft and Combined Additional
Coverage and Collision Insurance)
The only bids received for Automobile Physical Damage Insurance
was from the Horizon Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance
Company with the following options:
Annual Premium
Fire, Theft and C.A.C.
$ 100 deductible $ 2,040
$ 250 deductible $ 1,878
• Collision Insurance
$ 100 deductible $14,753
$ 250 deductible $12,117
$1,000 deductible $ 5,901
Note: C.A.C. - Combined Additional Coverage
includes the perils of windstorm, hail
earthquake, explosion, riot or civil
commotion, falling aircraft, malicious
or vandalism, flood, or external
discharge or leakage of water.
r'
MOBILE EQUIPMENT
PHYSICAL DAMAGE INSURANCE
Two quotations were received to provide All -Risk Insurance on '
Mobile Equipment (other than automobiles and other.vehicles
licensed for highway use) but including the fire engine and
the hook & ladder trucks. This schedule of equipment includes '.
only those pieces of equipment with a replacement value in
excess of $7,500 (Equipment items of lesser value are insured
at locations where they are stored or used under another policy
which 'insures all other real and personal property of the city).
The Horizon Agency quoted an annual premium of $3,833 on
behalf of the Home Insurance Company, adjustable, based on an
increase or decrease in values at a rate of.3937. Brandow,
Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom quoted an annual premium of
$4,770 on behalf of the AEtna Insurance Company based „on an
annual rate of .49. Both quotations are based on.a total value
of $973,550, with insurance to be written with a $1,000 deductible
clause. The quotation on behalf of the Home Insurance Company
is recommended.
e
FINE ARTS INSURANCE
(Art Objects on Display in Library)
A bid for $9,050 All -Risk insurance on Art Objects on
display in the Library was received from the Horizon
Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance Company and for an
annual premium of $32 and a bid for the same coverage and
amount was received from Brandow, Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom
for an annual premium of $45. Acceptance of 'the bid from the
Horizon Agency is recommended.
R
BUSINESS INTERRUPTION INSURANCE
Liquor Stores and Braemar
The Horizon Agency and Brandow, Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom
submitted bids for the Business Interruption Insurance covering
the Liquor Stores and Braemar. Both quotations are based on
$535,000 insurance covering the perils of fire, extended
coverage, vandalism and sprinkler leakage with a 50/ coinsurance,
.Gross Earnings form as suggested in the specifications. The
Horizon Agency quoted an annual premium on behalf of the Home
Insurance Company of $852, and the comparable quote from
Brandow, Howard, Kohler and Rosenbloom on behalf of the
St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company was $931. Acceptance of
the bid from the Horizon Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance
Company is recommended.
h
MONEY AND SECURITIES INSURANCE
A bid for insurance covering loss of money from the liquor
stores and the Braemar Club House and Arena was submitted by
the Horizon Agency on behalf of the Home Insurance Company as
requested in the specifications for an annual premium of $1,822.
A bid-for identical coverage was submitted by Wood - Nelson
Company on behalf of the Hartford Fire Insurance Company for an
annual premium of $1,519. Acceptance of the bid from Wood - Nelson
Company is recommended.
h
I 4
WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE
Two identical quotations were received for Worker's Compensation
Insurance from the Horizon Agency, Inc. and from Wood - Nelson
Company.
The premium in both proposals is a net guaranteed annual cost
of $110,745 based on the current experience modification of
1.08% and the standard premium discount of $20,170.
If the insurance is written by the Horizon Agency it would either
be in the Home Insurance Company or in the Assigned Risk Pool.
If the insurance is written by the Wood - Nelson Company it would
be in the Employers Insurance Company of Wausau thru the Assigned
Risk Pool. Employers Insurance Company of Wausau would not
voluntarily quote on any of the City insurance at this time even
though they have had the liability and worker's compensation
insurance for several years.
The Wood - Nelson quotation recommends using the Assigned Risk
Pool and that the Pool use the Employers Insurance Company of
Wausau as the writing company in order to have the benefit of
their, experience and engineering facilities in servicing the
account. The Wood - Nelson quotation also.recommends that the
Worker's Compensation premium can be paid in installments with
50% of the premium paid as a down payment with quarterly payroll
audits or with 25% of the premium as a down payment with monthly
payroll audits.
The Horizon Agency quotation specifies that if thb Home Insurance
Company writes the Worker's Compensation Insurance on a voluntary
basis, the quotations for other lines of insurance on behalf
of the Home Insurance Company would be substantially higher and
in view of the fact that there were no other quotations for
some of the other lines, we would recommend that the Worker's
Compensation Insurance not be written on a voluntary basis in
the Home.
If the City feels there is sufficient advantage in the delayed
installment payment of Worker's Compensation premiums with more
frequent periodic payroll audits, the plan suggested by
Wood - Nelson Company using the Assigned Risk Pool and the
Employers Insurance Company of Wausau seems to be preferable.
c -
All
— _ __ _ -- - -- -- — - - - - -- -- r,- — —
IL
city of °
(T_. k � . -:
" I . 9A
a
5005 Minnetonka boulevard ss. louis park, Minnesota 55416 phone (612) 920 -3000
June 8, 1977
City of Edina
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
To the Mayor and City Council:
On behalf of the City Council, staff and residents of St. Louis Park, I
would like to take this opportunity to extend sincere appreciation and
gratitude to the City of Edina for the excellent assistance and cooperation -
it rendered to the City during the devastating grain storage facility fyree
at West 31st Street and Glenhurst Avenue on May 11, 1977. Enclosed is a
copy of a resolution of appreciation and commendation which was unanimously
adopted by the Council on June 6, 1977.
The tragic fire was responsible for the death of one person and losses are
estimated at $1 million. The tremendous magnitude of the fire made it
impossible for St. Louis Park'to control the fire without additional help.
Neighboring communities, metropolitan agencies, area businesses and area
institutions contributed personnel and equipment in a joint effort to
control the fire and its effects.
The assistance the City obtained from the City of Edina was extremely
valuable and was a definite asset to the total effort to extinguish the
fire and prevent its spread to neighboring properties. The City Council
hopes that the City of Edina will extend this gesture of appreciation and
commendation to all those individuals of your organization who participated
in the cooperative effort to control the grain storage facility fire.
Once again, many thanks to your community for its cooperation in the City's
fire fighting activities. Hopefully, similar tragedies will be avoided in
the future. It is encouraging to know that St. Louis Park can depend on
your aid during emergency situations.
cerejy.
Ir ing M. Stern
Mayor
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION AND
COI LdENDATION
WHEREAS, on Play 11, 1977, an explosion ignited the grain storage
facilities at West 31st Street and CZenhurst Avenue in St. Louis Park
causing a devastating fire responsible for one death and estimated
losses of $1 million; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park was assisted by personnel
and equipment from numerous metropolitan agencies in its efforts to
control the fire and prevent its spread to neighboring properties;
and
WHEREAS, this mutual assistance was a nWor factor in controlling
the fire and preventing additional loss of Life and property; and
WHEREAS, it is fitting and proper that this cooperation and
assistance to be recognized and acknowledged; therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota, that appreciation for the excellent assistance and cooperation
rendered during this fire be extended to the community of
EDINA
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the St. Louis Park City Council requests
that the City of Edina extend to all of its employees who participated
in this effort appreciation and commendation on behalf of the residents
of St. Louis Park.
Adopted by the City CounciZ June 6, 1977.
Irvi4 19. 4ern
Mayor
Wa 0 0 0 — V'l Z: L'S To N ¢ 0 ® °.A P J'J Y Fourth Floor Builders Exchange, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 / Phone 336.5366
BUSINESS AND PERSONAL IINSURANCE
June 22, 1977
Mr. J. N. Dalen,
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota
Finance Director
We would like to express our position on the recent bids for the City
of.Edina. As respects the Worker's Compensation, it is our contention
that Wood - Nelson Company be recognized as agents due to our recommen-
dations as respects premium payments and assignment to Employers of
Wausau. These recommendations were not proposed by any other agent and
there is a question as to whether they would have been. We also talked
to the Worker's Compensation Bureau directly to obtain prior approval
on our recommendations.
There have also been some comments from another agent about the
possibility of splitting the worker's compensation premium and
commission. The City should be aware that our agency also represents
Home Insurance Company and, in fact, we were the first agents to bring
in complete specifications to the Home Insurance Company. In the past,
the Home has maintained a policy of releasing bids to the first agent.
in with the specifications. We do not feel the Home has taken a fair
position in recognizing another agent because he had a small additional
policy with the Home. Also, the policy was written with the Chandler -
Lang Agency and not the Horizon Agency. We, however, let the situation
ride because we did not want to jeopardize the City's position with the
insurers. We then contacted a number of additional companies in an
attempt to solicit another bid for the City, knowing full well we
could not compete with the Home. As far as time and effort expended
on our part, we feel we are entitled to equal consideration and if
Horizon Agency desires a split on the worker's compensation, we would
request a split on the other coverages with Home Insurance Company;
possibly let the Home submit a bid on behalf of all agents and let the
City select an "agent of record."
We are sorry for any problems, however, we
being given full consideration. Our agency
assistance to the City of Edina and feel we
any aspect of their insurance program.
Yours very truly,
BRADLEY J. HEPP
Vice President
pab
feel that our agency is not
is most eager to be of
are qualified.to service
J S R. F
ice President
(2)
HORIZON
AGENCY, INC.
Suite 318
8401 Wayzata Boulevard
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426
Bill Homeyer
Vice President
612 /475 -7671 e
June 21, 1977
Mr. J. N. Dalen
Finance Director, City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Dalen,
Attached is a letter from Mr. Robert L: Karlstrand, the head of
Minnesota Assigned Risk Pool. I believe his letter confirms the
points I was trying to make at the council meeting last night,
June 20th.
After hearing you express your wishes to be placed with Employers
Insurance of Wausau, should I be awarded the bid, I would also
recommend placement with Wausau, although as I have said I can not
guarantee that they will be the carrier.
If you have any questions whatsoever, please call me.
Yours truly
HORIZON AGENCY, INC.
William P. Homrr
WPH /ps
J. P. HILDEBRANDT
General Manager
MINNESOTA COMPENSATION RATING BUREAU
523 MARQUETTE AVENUE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 332 -0532 Bureau File No.
June 21, 1977
J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
and members of the
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Dalen:
s comprised of four companies (Employers Insurance
The Assigned Risk Pool i
of Wausau, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance
Company and Travelers Insurance Company)• Anew risk to the Pool map ask
and every
for a specific company, ys effort b
ut this cannot be guaranteed.
placement with that specific company,
Monthly payment plans with a 25% deposit are available to all risks who
qualify, and the City of Edina would qualify.
Very truly yours,
Robert L. garlstr d
RLK:ko
WHEN REPLYING INDICATE BUREAU FILE NUMBER
GUSTAFSON. GUSTAFSON & ADAMS. P. A.
June. 15, 1977
Mr. Jerry Dahlen
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Aspen Construction Company - Edina Lots
Dear Jerry:
This letter is to confirm the conversation of this morning
.with you when the bid was submitted on behalf of Aspen. Construction
Company. It is my understanding that the bid was modified to
reflect a bid of $17,000.00 for the third lot with a total down
payment on all three lots in the amount of $6,000..00. It is
also my understanding that this bid and these terms must be
accepted.by the Edina City Council next Monday night.
If you have any questions please.do not hesitate to call
me. Thank you for-your courtesies in this matter.
GDG :'cw
Very truly yours,
GUSTAFoii, GUSTAFSON &ADAMS, P.A.
Gfegory 4 Gustafson
Attorney t Law
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 411
7400 METRO BOULEVARD
HARRY GUSTAFSON
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 66436
WALTER C. GUSTAFSON
TELEPHONE (612) 836-7277
MICHAEL J. ADAMS
`
GREGORY D. GUSTAFSON
JOHN M. BUJAN
June. 15, 1977
Mr. Jerry Dahlen
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Aspen Construction Company - Edina Lots
Dear Jerry:
This letter is to confirm the conversation of this morning
.with you when the bid was submitted on behalf of Aspen. Construction
Company. It is my understanding that the bid was modified to
reflect a bid of $17,000.00 for the third lot with a total down
payment on all three lots in the amount of $6,000..00. It is
also my understanding that this bid and these terms must be
accepted.by the Edina City Council next Monday night.
If you have any questions please.do not hesitate to call
me. Thank you for-your courtesies in this matter.
GDG :'cw
Very truly yours,
GUSTAFoii, GUSTAFSON &ADAMS, P.A.
Gfegory 4 Gustafson
Attorney t Law
HARRY GUSTAFSON
WALTER C. GUSTAFSON
MICHAEL J. ADAMS
GREGORY D. GUSTAFSON
JOHN M. BUJAN
GUSTAPSON. GUSTAFSON & ADAMS. P. A.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SUITE 411
7400 METRO BOULEVARD
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55435
TELEPHONE (612) 835 -7277
June 15, 1977
Ms. Florence Hallberg
City Clerk
.City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: William Wardwell Lewis Bids
Dear Florence:
Enclosed please find the bid by Aspen Construction Company
covering Lot 1, Block land Lot 1, Block 2, William Wardwell
Park Addition.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Very truly yours,
GUSTA ON,'GUST SON & ADAMS, P.A.
Gregor .. Gustaf s n
Attorney at Law
GDG:cw
Enclosure
CITY OF EDINA .
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
BID FORM
City Owned Lots in William Wardwell Lewis Park Addition
Bids Close 11:00 a.m., June 15, 1977
Minimum
Description Bid Bid
William Wardwell Lewis
Park Addition:
Lot 1, Block 1 $35,000 93 -7,160
Lot 1, Block 2 17,500 a3,��s
Lot 2, Block 2 17,500 d 17
1
Terms can be arranged.*
Aspen Construction Company
Name
7400 Metro Boulevard
Address
835 -2188
Telephone
*10% down, 10% interest payable quarterly, principal amount
for each lot payable in full upon earlier (1) 24 month .
anniversary or (2) commencement of construction, no prepayment
penalty.
r #:. L. S (i.,�/ -t � � v ✓�oT t ✓ � �Ti� -„y—C' � L. � Y �j� .:.1 L �— I �, p �D riL � �' }�..� 4 � i �6
OIL-
City of C •a,
4801 WEST PIRTIETN STREET • EDINA. MINNESOTA 95424
92%.8861
June 14, 1977
Dear City Manager:
Is your city as concerned about the inequities in property assessing practices
in the metropolitan area as is Edina?
You have undoubtedly read or heard about the figures shown in the Minneapolis
Tribune of June 6, 1977. A news story quoted a Citizen's League study on tax.
dollars, mill rates and sales ratios. It is evident from these figures that
we in Hennepin County are attempting to follow the State law which requires
that property be assessed at market value, much more closely than cities.in
Ramsey, Dakota, Scott, Carver, Washington and Anoka counties. [de range from
86.6% (Poss!) to 94.6% (guess who?) sales ratios. Compare that range with
these lovelies:. West St. Paul 80, White Bear Lake 70.7, South St. Paul 80.2,
Shakopee 7.4.3, St. Paul 75.1, Roseville 78, North Oaks 68. Surprisingly,
.Minneapolis is not too far off at 86.9.
This situation has existed for many years and relatively little improvement
has occurred. The Mayor and Council have asked that I determine whether your
city is interested in making strong efforts immediately to force -the State Tax
Department to really equalize sales ratios throughout the metropolitan area.
Will you please advise me. of your city's interest in this problem, together with
any suggestions you may have as to how we should proceed.
Very truly yours,
Warren C. Hyde
City Manager
. WCH /md
cc: Same letter to these municipalities:
Bloomington
Excelsior
Brooklyn Center
Golden Valley
Brooklyn Park
Hopkins
Champlin
Maple Grove
Crystal
Minnetonka
Eden Prairie
Mound
New Hope
Plymouth
Richfield
St. Louis Park
Wayzata
Members present:
Member absent:
Staff present:
Others present:
SECTION A
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JUNE 14, 1977
9:30 A.M.
Adam Batko
Lois Coon
Robert Dunn
Lowell Holman
Gordon Hughes
Craig Swanson
Fran Hoffman
Ray O'Cannel1, Edina Citizens Safety Council
Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested'or modified, and
the Council's authorization of recommended action.
1. Installation of CURVE sign for eastbound Edina Industrial Boulevard
traffic near Radisson South driveway and letter to Radisson South
requesting correction of driveway layout.
Clarence Rud, Radisson South, requests a warning CURVE sign be installed
for Edina Industrial Boulevard eastbound near driveway. He cites cars
driving eastbound at night drive off street and into the driveway
damaging the driveway.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mrs. Coon moved that the Committee recommend installation of the CURVE
sign as requested and Radisson South re- construct the driveway as
requested by City.staff in January of 1976. Captain Holman seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of the request.
1. Marion Turney, 254.Holly Road, Hopkins, requests consideration on STOP
sign installation on the corner of Spruce Road and John Street. (See
attached letter.)
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
June 14, 1977
ACTION TAKEN:
Page 2
Captain Holman reported that the Police Department has surveyed the area
and found no speeding problem and a low traffic volume. Mr. Hoffman
reported that the only.possible hazard is the visibility as pedestrians
emerge from the gates at the end of Holly Road and Ashley Road onto
Spruce Road.
Mr. Hughes moved that the .Committee recommend denial of the STOP sign
request for lack of warrants. Mr. Batko seconded the motion. Motion
carried.
2. Mrs. R. W. DuFour, 5904 Arbour Avenue, requests STOP signs for Arbour at
Sun Road. She feels that it is a dangerous intersection and school .
crossing guards are having difficulties during patrol hours.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reported that he had contacted Countryside School officials
for an opinion on the safety problems at the intersection of Sun and
Arbour. The school opinion was that no real difficulties existed and
the school did not see a need for STOP signs. Captain Holman reported
that the Department had worked the area and found no speeding problem
with very low traffic volume.
Mrs. Coon moved that the Committee recommend denial of the request for
a lack of warrants. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried.
3. Mrs. Patricia Monson, 6000 Ashcroft, requests a 3 -way STOP at 58th and
Concord. West 58th Street is currently stopped at Concord (T- intersection):
She cites a need to control speed on Concord.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman reported that Concord is stopped at West 59th Street.
Captain Holman reported that, from his observations, a STOP sign is not
needed. Mr. O'Connell, who lives in the area, did not feel that STOP
signs are justified.
Captain Holman moved that the Committee recommend denial of the request
as the warrants for multi -way STOPS are not met. Mr. Batko seconded the
motion. Motion carried.
Traffic Safety Committee Minutes Page 3
June 14, 1977
SECTION C
Requests on which the Committee defers action or refers to others.
1. Mrs. Gordon Rholl, 5825 Tingdale, requests a 4th STOP sign be added at
Benton and Tingdale, which is a 4 -way intersection with STOP signs for
only three directions. She feels that the current situation is con-
fusing.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr._Batko moved deferral of the matter until further information can be
gathered on this request. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion
carried.
2. Police request for STOP AHEAD sign at Belmore and Monroe for eastbound
Belmore. Hedges do not allow good visibility of STOP sign.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Batko moved deferral of action to determine if a better solution can
be found. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Fran Hoffman, Secretary
Edina Traffic Safety Committee
I , .
May 16, 1977
The Traffic Safety Committee
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: Mr. Hoffman.-
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
254 Holly Road
Hopkins, Minnesota 55343
N
Further to our telephone conversation on Wednesday, May 11th,
I should like to put in writing my request that the Traffic
Safety Committee consider placing a stop sign on the corner
of Spruce Road and John Street in Edina.
Because traffic may travel uninterrupted down Spruce Road,
cars often move at considerable speed. This is of some con-
cern to myself and my neighbors because many pedestrians
(mainly children) and cyclists use the gateways at the ends
of Holly Road and Ashley Road onto Spruce Road on their way
to Ronnie's pond on Belmont Road. Last Tuesday evening
our dog was hit by a car as he emerged from Holly Road onto
Spruce Road and unfortunately was badly injured. We are
very concerned that the next accident may involve a child.
I appreciate that a stop sign might not always be obeyed,
but I feel that it would slow traffic down and that is what
we need. At present, Spruce Road is an unimpeded raceway as
there is no reason for cars to slow down. My neighbors,
Mrs. Archie Black and Mrs. Lloyd Hoff, who live on Holly
Road immediately next to Spruce Road have complained on
many. occasions to the Edina Police Department about speeding
traffic on Spruce Road and are very concerned that something
be done about it.
If you feel that a stop sign would not be feasible, perhaps
you have other suggestions which might help slow the cars
down or at least have traffic approach this area with caution.
I hope you can do something to help the situation..
Y s si el
44
arion Tu ney
MT:jk
M
a
L9
0
Lr
M
C
_0
N
Lr
L
T
0
}
Q1
to
C
`e
C
C
T
n.
1
r.�
f
1
cr
Q1
CE
Vj
e
}
L
0
N
N
LO
N
LO
i
La
N
N
to
M
N
N
Ul
ro
Ln
C
C
E
I
Pi
LL
T
U
1-u
May 24, 1977
Ms. Jane Budd
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Jane,
I received your letter in which you indicated concern
was expressed by the Council regarding the amount of
services received in each community served by Storefront/
Youth Action. As I understood your letter, the concern
was that the monthly report didn't clearly indicate that
the amount of services was equal to the amount of finan-
cial support given.
During the current calendar year our contract with
Richfield is for $15,000, with Bloomington, $$10,000, and
with Edina, $13,500. We have two youth workers in Richfield,
one and one half in Bloomington, and three and two- thirds
in Edina. In addition we have a full time office manager
at the Youth Action office, which is maintained in Edina.
The Community Education money we receive in Edina enables
us to offer more of a preventative program in Edina than
in either of the other communities.
In reviewing the statistical report, it is important to
keep in mind that The Storefront developed out of a model
which emphasized short term counseling and referral, while
Youth Action developed out of a model in which long term
'counseling was provided. We still provide longer term
services at the Youth Action program and thus work with
fewer clients.
Our hope is to continue to be flexible enough to respond
to the needs of each community we serve. This may result
in a somewhat different emphasis in each community.
I hope this information is helpful. I don't think that a
change in the monthly report could accurately reflect the
amount and intensity of the services provided by Storefront/
Youth Action in the communities we serve. I would welcome
an opportunity to appear before the Council and speak to
this issue and any other questions they may have.
2 Si cere_L
t ve f_epi�
Director,
STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION
SRL:ds
�-- -- � - -.i ���• .ter' ��p. �: �m.���.r'!�'��
4601 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA. MINNESOTA 75424
927.8861
June 14, 1977
Dear City Manager:
Is your city as concerned about the inequities in property assessing practices
in the metropolitan area as is Edina?
You have undoubtedly read or heard about the figures shown in the Minneapolis
Tribune of June 6, 1977. A news story quoted a Citizen's League study on tax
dollars, mill rates and sales ratios. It is evident from these figures that
we in Hennepin County are attempting to follow the State law which requires
that property be assessed at market value, much more closely than cities in
Ramsey, Dakota, Scott, Carver, Washington and Anoka counties. We range from
86.6% (Poss!) to 94.6% (guess who ?) sales ratios. Compare that range with
these lovelies: West St. Paul 80, White Bear Lake 70.7, South St. Paul 80.2,
Shakopee 74.3, St. Paul 75.1, Roseville 78, North Oaks 68. Surprisingly,
Minneapolis is not too far off at 86.9.
This situation has existed for many years and relatively little improvement
has occurred. The Mayor and Council have asked that I determine whether your
city is interested in making strong efforts immediately to force the State Tax
Department to really equalize sales ratios throughout the metropolitan area.
Will you please advise me of your city's interest in this problem, together with
any suggestions you may have as to how we should proceed.
Very truly yours,
Warren C. Hyde
City Manager
WCH /md
cc: Same letter to these municipalities:
Bloomington
Excelsior
New Hope
Brooklyn Center
Golden Valley
Plymouth
Brooklyn Park
Hopkins
Richfield
Champlin
Maple Grove
St. Louis Park
Crystal
Minnetonka
Wayzata
Eden Prairie
Mound
a
SUMMARY EXPkKUOURE
HEPUNI BY DEPT
UENE"AL FUND LNLY
CITY OF EMINAP MINN AS OF
JUNE IS# 1977
REG
76.110
EXPENDITURE
FUND
DEPT DESCRIPYICN
APPROP%
YTD
BALANCE
PERCENT
to
to
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
25#620,00
9P,156.84
16,463,16
35e7
to
12
PLANNING
62p698*00
39#419.10
23,278,90
6208
0- - __-_14-_AUHINISTPATTCN--
180,398,00
7 5 p 77 8. 0A -- --
- - - --- 104,619092
10
16
FINANCE
145p365.00
53#954.51
93,410049
37a1
10
18
ELFCTICN
70295.00
11*182.12
3,887,12a
153.2
____._Io
- ___'1o_ ___ASsESSING
118#206,00
4 6j,339.81
71,866@lq
3q,2
so
22
LEr.AL AND COURT SERVICES
92#240000
/17#248.26
44,991.74
51.2
to
24
PU•LIC WCRKS ADMIN.
46P030,00
170931.72
28,098,28
3A,9
10
'26 - .._,ENGINEERING
2141,174,00
820703,20
-- 131,470.80
3806
to
28
PUBLIC WORKS SUP, 9 OVERHEAD
2090001,00
61045,40
147,255660
29.5
0
30
STREET DEPARTMENT
302.419.45
756,130.55
28.5
10
ij2
POLICE. -
1 #267,,390 000
561#972.23
70S,u17977
44.3
10
44
FIRE
675019,00
253p332,97
422,386*03
3704
-10
46
CIVILIAN OFFENSE
7,135,00
6?1.900
7.758.9( 1
A,7•
to
47
ANIMAL Cc_N T pCL__
270,700.00
7P4R7.70
- 20,212.30
2700
10
48
HEALTH
610158,00
27p625.53
33,53?-,47
4511
49
INIPECTTrNS
82,933.00
33PI93.18
49, 739, b2
/A 0 0 0
10
So—
NON-DEPARTPOEt%TAL
214p49u,00
69,159.35 - -
-- - 145,334.65 -------
3? .2
10
51
CENiTHAL SERVICES
8130180.00
3360450,14
476,729.86
41.3
10
- -
52
-
CITY HALL
52,500000
3301953.22
18,546.78
611.6
10
-54
__55#62n,00
-----al 61
to
56
EQIJIPMENT CPERATION
3650220,00
144083.56
220,436,44
3q,f,
--FUND---..---.-
5*7820626.00
-2 0 2 38 & 0 7 3 , 37
3#544,552,63
20
60
PARK ADMINISTRATION
206P467,00
77#881.09
128,585a91
3707
FUND
206#467.00
77P881.09
128,585091
FUND
• e 0
goo
08
ila fl
.09
20
62
PARK RECREATION
82P005000
20s259.89
61,745a11
2407
20
-FUKiOF_---
2500996,00
1120835.78
138060.22
44,9
I - __ -
33SP001000
133p095*67
-'19 9 , 9 0 5 , 3 3
3q0q
USER
--- TOTAL..,------.-.
6*322P094000
2f449P050.13
3.873,043.87
30*7
FINAL
TOTALS
6#322#094000
2#449P050.13
3,873,043.87
3807
lilies RECORDS
TOTALED
a
a5muL_
jlza_e� .ne-
�O a2ee ��>n /d ire. ,�-•d U
/977
11111 If
,u . ', z✓.zvw�
of
Z-. t-?�t
�4- era_ -u. � 1_ - �+-..✓n -°'�� c /WWC4:.
��'�"-�y��,-
IL
a
012-
ti
MEMO TO: Mr. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
Edina City Council Members
FROM: Mr. Ken Rosland, Director of Park-and Recreation Department
DATE: June 17, 1977
SUBJECT: DUTCH ELM DISEASE
.
At present, the City has identified 213 cases of Dutch Elm Disease on
private property and some 200 cases on public and boulevard properties.
A good share of the public property cases are located along Nine Mile
Creek in the Londenderry Townhouse area, which has a particularly bad
infestation. The City .crews are trying to stay within a weeks time
schedule from our identification of the disease to removal of the tree.
The State subsidy is based on a 45% return to the City of the total
they spend on control of the disease. This year the City will receive
money for tree removal on boulevards and public property which was not
received previously.
The subsidy for the private homeowner from the State, is based upon
45% of whatever the City will pay to the homeowner. We are recommending
that the City adopt the policy of refunding 50% of the cost of a private
tree takedown. The State would then pay 45% of our cost.
EXAMPLE: Tree removal cost $200.00
Refund to homeowner 100.00
State.subsidy 45.00
City cost 55.00
s�
K. R.
p 0 0
lb
TO: J. N. Dalen, Finance Director
FROM: Earl Meichsner, Director
Tri -City Public Health Lab
DATE: June 10, 1977
Enclosed are the bids for the specification meter.
The lab needs this meter to meet Environmental Protection Agency stan-
dards for analysis of flouride under the new Federal and State drinking
water standards which go into effect July 1, 1977. The method pre-
sently used for flouride analysis will not meet the standa yd s.
The Orion #901 was selected as the instrument of choice for its relia-
bility, accuracy, versatility, and labor savings.
EM: nr
i lam'
/ X -A
Quotation:
OFishn-ar SciantKic Company
1600 WestGlen Lake Avenue
Itasca, IL 60143
TO:
Earl Meichsner
Tri City Public Health Lab
4801 W. 50th
Edina, MN 55436
ut o�01 v -rn mull IIFIV NO
DATED:
Phone: (312) 773-3050
ALL CORRESPONDENCE MUST REFER TO THIS NO. —,
QUOTATION NO:
DATE: June 6, 1977
F.O.B.: Destination
DELIVERY TIME: 7 -10 Days
TERMS:
I
Prices are firm for 30 days unless otherwise noted.
all Invoices. Balances remaining unpaid at due date
are subject to service charge of 1% per month until pai
QUANTITY
FISHER
CATALOG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
NET PRICE
LOT
NET PRICE
p`I
Model 901 ph meter
724.95
::l:ea
13- 641 -716
lea
13 -641 -701
Model 701A ph Meter
1291.9 5
9 N c'ftS %c lor.i RS pep R.4,
j e I +; pifp Ne C/0[77
7
iec,
l3 -GYI-
4 k)e�'LlreA-Ice elec -foe.
C,o,00
r loUr;dt E lecloode,
S-0, &V
NOTE: WHEN ORDERING PLEASE STATE "PRICE AS PER QUOTATION" OR ATTACH COPY OF QUOTE
SIGNED
FORM 314 %
12•76 J.M: Ross
UUU ® ® I fs
ML 8
Prices,include box," and containers except as noted, are based f. o. b. shipping point unless otherwise stated, and are subject to changes as may occur
between the above date and receipt of order. Shipments of corrosive or inflammable liquids and solids and of oxidizing agents, are made in accordance -
with lllnterstate IC lommerce (Clommission regulations and the special packing required is charged extra at cost. This quotation is offered for prompt
acceptance, goods subject to prior sale and availability from our sources of supply; delivery schedules subject to revision due to factors beyond our
control. We undertake full responsibility for the goods we offer to the extent of their intrinsic value and in no case are liable for claim of any kind for an
amount greater than the purchase price of the goods in respect of which damages are claimed. Subject to state, local and federal taxes where applicable. -
DATE: 5/4/77
Tri City Public Health Lab.
Attn: Earl Meichsner
5146 Eden Ave. YOUR INQUIRY:
Edina, Mn. 55436
I IN REPLY, REFER TO
J OUR QUOTE No.: T
°
BY:^
1 ea 386 -24) Orion 901 Microprocessor ionalyzer (-'1595.00 ea
1 ea 320 -184` /Orion 701A PH Meter O ea
/ C. `°
q0 -96Z F /etoi,*,Je �c rt o�
FOB: Destination `� S
Net 30 Days d
J
Quotation sent per request of CMS sales representative, Bob Dusterhoft
CURTIN MATHESON SCIENTIFIC, INC.
A COULTER SUBSIDIARY COMPANY
2218 University Avenue, S.E.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414
612- 378 -1110 CIN15
CMS -214 6 -74
i f.1
MRMORANinTTM
17-4-a'
TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager DATE: May 26, 1977
FROM: David A. Velde, Assistant Sanitarian RE: Proposed Amendment to Ordinance
No. 311.
Attached is a copy of a proposed amendment to Ordinance No. 311. The purpose of
the amendment is to aid the Animal Control Officer in his attempt to control cer-
tain nuisances associated with the keeping of dogs on residential property.
The reason we have requested this amendment is because of difficulties encountered
while dealing with certain dog runs and enclosures. The placement of a dog
enclosure is restricted to no closer than five feet from the property line in
accordance-with the Zoning Ordinance. The dog enclosure is interpreted as an ac-
cessory use of the residential property. Any nuisance problems associated with the
dog enclosure have been handled under the .refuse and nuisance ordinances. However,
these ordinances were not constructed to deal with animal related problems, and
consequently are ineffective. In fact, to declare an accumulation.of dog food
and dog feces a nuisance, they must be on the property-for ten days before abate-
ment can be ordered.
The impetus for drafting-this amendment came from several problems that arose
during the summer of 1976. The first problem consisted of a family that built
a dog run near the side property line. The owner's garage effectively screened
the enclosure from his house. However, the dog run was in full view from the
next door neighbor's rear yard even though the five -foot setback was maintained.
Adding insult to injury, the enclosure was not cleaned daily and during the first
rain, the accumulation of dog food and dog feces was washed unto the neighbor's
yard. Additionally, the dog's barking was heard full force by the neighbor, but
not by the owner.
Another instance.that occurred.last summar was a case where the dog owner picketed
a dog.in.an area below the hill at the rear'of the yard and out of his view.
However, the area that the dog was picketed in was in full view of a neighbor's
rear yard where a swimming pool was located. The odor from the decaying food
and the feces was quite noticeable while the neighbor was using his swimming pool.
The dog was leashed during.the day and protested.by barking.
There are other cases similar to this in Edina. The ordinances that we presently
have are not effective in dealing with the nuisances which result from the estab-
lishment of a dog run or enclosure. In fact, by placing the dog in an enclosure,
the effects are concentrated and pose more problems than when the dog is allowed to
roam within the entire rear yard. In most cases, the owner of the dog does not
wish to be bothered by the nuisances associated with enclosing the dog so they
tend to locate the enclosure in an area which is least offensive to themselves.
When this happens, it usually places the burden of tolerance upon the neighbor.
It is hoped that with the passage of this amendment, the City will be more effective
in dealing with this problem.
DAV:nr
Enclosure
ORDINANCE NO. 311 -A9
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 311 PROVIDING
FOR DOG ENCLOSURES, THE PICKETING OF DOGS, AND
SANITATION OF DOG ENCLOSURES AND PICKETING AREAS
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, Ordains:
Section 1. Sec. -1 of Ordinance No. 311 is hereby amended by adding
the following:
"Dog enclosure" means any enclosure used for the keeping of dogs
and having an area less than 1500 square feet.
"Rear yard" shall have the meaning as defined in Ordinance No. 811.
"Picket" shall mean to restrain a dog by means of a chain, leash,
or other' attachment to a fixed object, thereby confining the dog
to a determined area.
Section 2. Sec. 17 of Ordinance No. 311 is hereby amended by adding
the following:
"(e) A dog enclosure shall be placed in the rear yard no closer
than 20 feet from any property line. The area must be screened
from view of adjacent property by dense vegetation or fencing of
• 90 percent opacity. In the alternative, the entire rear yard
may be enclosed for the purpose of keeping the dog. The owner
shall clean the enclosure or yard regularly and shall not permit
feces, food scraps, or other odiferous materials to remain for
more than 24 hours."
"(f) No dog shall be picketed in such a manner as to create a
nuisance by noise or odor to adjacent property. No dog shall be
picketed to occupy the area closer than 20 feet of a property
line. The owner shall regularly clean the area to which the dog
is confined and shall not permit feces, food scraps, or odiferous
materials to remain in the confinement area for more than 24 hours."
June 13, 1977
To: Mayor and Council
From: Warren C. Hyde
Re: Sale of City Property to 0ur Lady of Grace Church
On Tuesday morning, June 7, I received a phone call from Ken.Wanner, who now
owns the.former Balfanz property just north of the City property.which you
approved selling to Our Lady of Grace at the meeting June 6. He reminded me,
that he felt I had promised him a.chance at the .City property, and indicated
that he wanted to make a bid on it. He was also concerned about the.transfer
of the easement over his property, to the City property and wanted the City to
drop it, and not transfer; it with the sale.
I-do not specifically recall that I made any promise to Mr. Wanner that he would
have a chance to bid on the City property, as it has always, been my feeling, and
.I think yours, too; that for visual appearances the City would not. want an ex-
tension of industrial or commercial use south from the Wanner property. I, advised
him that the only reason for selling the. City. property was to provide a better
appearance for that area.
I suggested to him that he.get in touch with Bob Short concerning the easement
and I understand they did.discuss. the problem, with no mutual understanding being
reached.
Mr. Wanner indicated last Wednesday that he would be making an offer, but to date
it has not been received, and.I again told-him that we would probably not want to
sell for future commercial /industrial usage.
In the meantime, we do have a proposed purchase agreement and a check from the
church for $1,000. The agreement states that:
"The property described herein is being purchased to be used for
church purposes. In the event that the same ceases to be used
for church purposes, the Church is to offer.the property first
-to the Village of Edina for $22,500.00 before the same can be
put on the market for sale to others than the Village of Edina."
A possession date of September 1 should be inserted.
Despite Mr. Wanner's objections, I recommend that we sign the purchase agreement.
CITY OF EDINA
June 17, 1977
TO: Mayor and City.Council
FROM: Finance Director
SUBJECT: Terms Contract for Deed, Gary G. Halverson
Attached find revised copy of Contract for Deed prepared by Mr. Halverson.
He hoped that item four (4) would allow him to start building without paying
the contract up in full as requested by you. I have discussed the item with
Mr. Richards and he suggested the following:
Item 4. The party of the second part shall furnish to the party of the first
part 1943n wavers and /or receipts for,all,materials, services, and
labor brought to said property by party of the second part..
Item 5. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the vendee's
interest herein cannot be assigned or transferred; and in event
vendee makes application for mortgage financing on said premises,
the full amount due hereunder at the time shall be paid in full
if such event shall occur prior to April 15, 1980.
.r
l
' 1
1
bis0tgreemert, Made and entered into this .......... :....... _. .......... _.-__. dayof ...._.--,- ...�_._..._._._,_r,
- -
Z9 by andbe twee n.....___...____....__....:..___..,.- r... �.. �::.. a• a. .,�i.••:,.^..—= ,.:r_�;:s„ =.••..
part ...... of the first part, and ... =::..1.., la: = ..............
part.._,... of the second par$,
I
19itnemWetb. That the said part.--, of the first part in consideration of the covenants and agree -
mants of said part: ::......... of the second part, hereinafter contained, hereby seli._z-. and agree..;.. to conmy
unto said part...:...... of the second part, ._..:: :..._......and assigns, by a....._:.r..,_ -y s. .... ............. ------- Deed, amompanied by an abstract evidencing good title in past............ of the first part at the date hereof, .
or by an owner's duplicate certificats of title, upon the prompt and full performance by said part............
of the second part, of. .... _ .......... �115 part of this agreement, the tract..._. of land; lying and being in the
County of... - =: - _ _ _ _and State of Afinnesota, described as follows, to-wit:
.-"•rt of.__•7.. -� �_:C��.l, .0':? 1'__c �3 3_ 'l. ?.� l .7
cG r, a, ny a•.._? i' 0, ��» t rl 14nc nom, { � ,., r,
a =ir. n:a:�in� _'ro. -ci.. o^ ,,.. . .. s� __„ _ .. c_ sa -= mac. � k -- -. I
coint is 5 °.e °_t -: wes'.0 _ Af :l:6 C_ .: - of ct 1%� 4:0 e.
Point -on .7:. d1..d S7t ° -_ 11n3 = said, Lz,t, . it �:iw:% palnt is-•ten feel. .
Gort• -s1 - - _ _ .._rl ^a, : said =o.
-=i•- JO.:.. �1 ^_ _ ' i'.'• _.._ -_,� -_- __ _ , w.. a+ e�a,r>kQw.,Iixfe.t.�,rk.zw.t�wr
s7owk»hci4 ��'3a V- - -_ °_ 'r, __ c v _ _ -. _:'J'• . -.c. _ .
+
Poi n' _ }v _ - ,:ort :.:aster = most of the ost lasterly corner of said :i Lot 5, y�
11nd said part ...:......... of the second part, in consideration of the premises, hereby agree.:;.. to pay said
part. •- of the first part, at - r .'- -� .�. , - ..,.fir. _. ........_ ..... ____ .... .........
as and for the purchase price of said premises, the s
'_�,.-
i ----' -- - - - ±-- -.. -_- _
sum of....... �_.:..- _...__ ._.._�._�_.
...........st : .r<<.. ;,... ..;:..._. ��:----•______ ______ ____ __ ____________... °��_ W_.Dollars,
in -Wanner and at times following, to- wit: ..................... ............................... i
�• :.. ca:3 -_, " -e = ..n_�;t, of i:_. =.... is :er6',�,I 8.+..:.77x°
4, -1.n
G c2 la -cs O_° ._ -'�' r .- be 7c1� i. ✓7 ^o °cL _._ - � _]_ °t >:1 -
of ;1 .Vv or more .er '7 It:" 7n 15th J° L.P nont ✓a_:...__ V ❑ 50
and`contirain. unt__ Ipril Z , i'c at ahic3 ,._,:e the entire '7-,3id 7?iance
s'.1all --e Jue . ^.:'). D';, nCl_ _., _ ___. = is t? o'' tae s °coed _ s•: =l .ive the Drs - l -? -p
of - rakit: ; a-'�atio nci payment in- any amount in any inst -11 nent Cate. � 1
7isp .=_rt1 .._a` '-per suant hereto shall not defer hs •': i._ =;a_ =n
-ent an s:_ll 'e:6_; ••'.c tC _:ire the at an earlier data.
3. This sum of j13,475•00 s"all bear interest at the rate of �° per year on the
li:1r:3id - ,_a..Ce. ^_C:. -c -t fie== u'._e. _.:?i_ :;2 First applied to he intere t i
w h the O3iance e_ _isi to .educe _rireinal - -
4. The party of the seccnd Part shall furnish to the party of the first part
lein Txavers andior re-ce;pts for a'1 mater 4ajS brought to sa'_d property by
party of `the second part.
Said part T — .of the second part further covenants and agrees as follows: to pay, before penalty attaches thereto,-
all taxes due and payable in the year 19_ZZ and in subsequent years, and all special assessments heretofore or hereafter
levied, - , t ° -. a_ _ac ► =Z' -part-- - -- - - - -. -_ __-
alsc that any buildings and improvements now on said land, or which shall hereafter be erected, placed, or made thereon,
shall rot be removed therefrom, but shall be and remain the property of the part_;— of the first part until this con -
tr.._t shall be [ally performed by the part__._ of the second part; and wn expense, to keeptN*utld-
v.._
iPB�> f> aes� .pre+nisesegt,^alldimescins�ed is> some�6able:, tieswsrrcePari+ eas+ YCarrlpanie9� >ta<,btr,.>a,preebdeby+tht
ppaste**** eEl ha+fir-st<Paft~iWta WS, toy drefot
aretbagaitrselostbywindstorm '-fnr.atieaero'KEreisneamf_� --- .... - - - -_ --
pa+yabledasaid >parta......... ofai�t#rrest� part;.•_..._— _--- ...— ,theka# assigttm; rhrtd;# tt# �+ i7f�los §'- lkohfit`t1rtte�lYeyitt'r-
p1Yq.cow A* d•ab?vtetb* *awe Rt, ow*,ovAigg,s it" 61 ............ af*ths+firsuap %; __ - h'eins;�ormsysigtse;.•tf�a ebaEaued
slti�pa! el-iflvRr,:�k�tlie�saed:pwnk_._. af: xlhe, rseumdrprrk: at____._..._..----..--- -- .- .— .inxreRE�haikapPwaRt�astld =tom
dnppsioitk theyu ;-- Iaf+tha�rst�paespoEieies of szid iasnrra>tea But should the second part..;:-.. fail to pay any item
to be paid by said part.::.._.... under the terms hereof, same may be paid by first part— and shall be forthwith pay-
able, with interest thereon, as an additional amount due first part-.y--.- under this contract
l
Ei inr EzQta dDpai tment Of h2a1th
U 717 s.e. delaware st. minneapolis 55440
June 3, 1977
To Whom it May Concern:
On June 24, 1977 new rules (im 145 -149) of the Pinnesota Department of Health
(hereafter, the Department) relating to public water supplies `-rill become
effective. A condensed version of. the ne-v rules is attached to this letter.
The rules require all community water suppliers to submit nonthly water samples
to an approved laboratory for bacteriological analysis. The samples to be .
analyzed must be taken at representative points on the distribution system at
regular time intervals. An information sheet showing the recommended sampling
frequency and the minimuri number of sampling points is attached to this letter.
The number of distribution samples required by the rules is determined by the
population served by the supply. Based on our records of the population served
by your system, your supplier will be required to collect _4IS' distribution
samples per month for bacteriological analysis. One of these will be analyzed
by the Department at no charge to your supply. Your supplier must arrange to
have the remaining Y_ samples analyzed by a laboratory certified by the
Department. A list of certified laboratories is enclosed.
Your supplier is strongly encouraged to continue bacteriological sampling of
the source water in addition to the sampling on the distribution system which
is required by these rules.
We have developed a schedule for submitting the monthly . samples to the State
laboratory in order to more evenly distribute the laboratory's workload. During
the quarter of July, August and September, your supplier must collect and submit
samples for analysis to the State laboratory on the following dates:
July /;R 1977
August �_, 1977
September _, 1977
The samples should be sent to the Minnesota Department of Health, Section
Analytical Services, 717 Delaware Street S.E.., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55 4
The samples should be collected at a time such that they can be shipped or mailed
immediately, i.e., as close as possible to the actual time the mail is collected
at the post office or shipping point. Bacteriological samples must be received
in the State laboratory within 30 hours of their collection or they will not
be analyzed.
In the near future, -ve will send your supplier a 3 -month supply of sample
bottles, mailing containers and sleeves, and bacteriological report forms. The
an equal opportunity employer .w;.,d�Q
r
r -2-
will include directions for c leting the form and for collecting
report forms i
the water samples.
We have assigned your CO=-unity water supply the following identification
number: Please use this number in completing the report forms.
_ -
/ �7o .* // ormation, please contact
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed inf -296-5270; or
Mr. Tomas Klaseus at 612- 296�522'i; tr'r• Stephen
fee1 Greenwood at 612
supply does not fall
ri�r. Doug Mandy at 612 - 296 - 5264. If you fee
supply lease
1 as given in t0ID 1�+5 , P
within the definition of a community water
one of the above numbers.
notipj this Department immediately
Sincerely,
Director
eucd M.P . H ,
Divi on of Environmental Health
minnesota department of health
uc�717 s.e. delaware. st. minneapolis 55440
June 3, 1977-
To l•7hom it P-lay Concern: .
on June 24, 1977 nel rules OuD 145 -149) of the .linnesota Department` of Health
(hereafter, the Department) relating to public water supplies will become
effective. A condensed version of the new rules is attached to this letter.
The rules require all community water suppliers to submit monthly water samples
to an approved laboratory for bacteriological analysis.. The samples to be
analyzed must be taken at representative points on the distribution system at
regular time intervals. An information sheet showing the recommended sampling
frequency and the minimum number of sampling points is attached to this letter.
The number of distribution samples required by the rules is determined by the
population served by the supply. Based on our records of the population served
by your system, your supplier will be required to collect 42 distribution
samples per month for bacteriological analysis. one of these will be analyzed
by the Department at no charge to your supply. Your supplier must arrange to
have the remaining / samples analyzed by a laboratory certified by the
Department. A list of certified laboratories is enclosed.
Your supplier is strongly encouraged to continue bacteriological sampling of
the source water in addition to the sampling on the distribution system which
is required by these rules.
We have developed a schedule for submitting the monthly samples to the State
laboratory in order to more evenly distribute the laboratory's workload. During
the quarter of July, August and September, your supplier must collect and submit
samples for analysis to the State laboratory on the following dates:
July ,?O 1977
August fer , 1977
September , ;W _-, 1977
The samples should be sent.-to the Minnesota Department of Health, Section of
Analytical Services, 717 Delaware Street S.E., 114inneapolis, Minnesota 55440•
The samples should be collected at a time such that they can be shipped or mailed
immediately, i.e., as close as possible to the actual time the mail is collected
At the post office or shipping point. Bacteriological samples must be received
in the State laboratory within 30 hours of their collection or they will not
be analyzed.
In the near future, we will send your supplier a.3 -month supply of sample
bottles, mailing containers and sleeves, and bacteriological report forms. The
an equal opportunity employer .•:'.
i -2-
report forms will include directions for completing the form and for collecting
the water samples.
The rules require 11 water s?Ippliers usinj surface sources in whole or in
part to collect samples and :measure turbidity once per day using the
nephelo- aet-ric =ethod. The turbidity samples must be collected by your supplier
at a representative entry point to the distributinn system.
All turbidity measurements must be performed by a person acceptable to the
Department. The Department is currently developing a procedure for approving
those individuals performing turbidity measurements. bls. Gunilla Montgomery
will be contacting your supplier in the near future to discuss this procedure.
We will send your supplier turbidity report forms, including directions for
completing the forms, as soon as they become available from the printer
(approximately June 25, 1977). The results of turbidity measurements must be
submitted by the supplier to the Department on the prescribed report forms.
We have assigned your community water supply the following 'identification
number: /? 7ep3 7. Please use this number in completing the bacteriological
and turbidity report forms.
If you have any questions concerning the enclosed information, please contact
Mr. Tomas Klaseus at 612- 296 -5227; Cllr. Stephen Greenwood at_612- 296 -5270; or
Mr. Doug Mandy at 612 -296 -5264. If you feel that your supply does not fall
within the definition of a community water supply as given in MHD 145, please
notify this Department immediately at one of the above numbers.
Sincerely, _
Ric and L. Wade, Ph.D., M.P.H., Director
D vi Lon of Environmental Health
4
i
[sk
4
WHEREAS, the record owner of that part of the West half of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the.East 400.10
feet thereof, and lying South of the North line of Interlachen Hills'and
the same extended East; except that part thereof embraced within the plat
of Interlachen Hills; has requested the vacation of the following described
Easement for Public Road Purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be the best interest of the City and
of the public that said Easement for Public Road Purposes be vacated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described Easement for Public
Road Purposes be and is hereby vacated effective June 20, 1977:
A sixty foot (60') strip of land in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
30, Township 117, Range 21, the center line of which is described
as follows:
Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of
Said Section 30, distant one hundred eighty -five feet (185')
West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition;
thence North parallel with the West line of said Addition one
thousand fifty -six and five hundredths feet (1056.051); thence
Northwesterly two hundred seventy -eight and sixty -five hundredths
feet (278.65') along a tangential.curve to the left, having a
radius of three hundred sixty and thirty -nine hundredths feet
(360.39'); thence Northerly three hundred thirty -four and
eighty -one hundredths feet (334.81') along a reverse curve,
having a radius of three hundred four and fifty -nine hundredths
feet (304.59'); thence Northeasterly along a line tangent to
last described curve and along the center line of Lincoln Drive
as platted in Interlachen Hills, a distance of one hundred feet
(100') and there terminating.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 20, 1977, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of June, 1977.
Deputy City Clerk
City of
bBOi WEST FIFTIETH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 33624
927 -8861
RESOLUTION
VACATING AN EASEMENT
FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES
LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4
OF SECTION 30,
TOWNSHIP 117,
RANGE 21, COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN, STATE
OF MINNE-
SOTA.
WHEREAS, the record owner of that part of the West half of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 30, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the.East 400.10
feet thereof, and lying South of the North line of Interlachen Hills'and
the same extended East; except that part thereof embraced within the plat
of Interlachen Hills; has requested the vacation of the following described
Easement for Public Road Purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be the best interest of the City and
of the public that said Easement for Public Road Purposes be vacated;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described Easement for Public
Road Purposes be and is hereby vacated effective June 20, 1977:
A sixty foot (60') strip of land in the Southwest 1/4 of Section
30, Township 117, Range 21, the center line of which is described
as follows:
Beginning at a point in the South line of the Southwest 1/4 of
Said Section 30, distant one hundred eighty -five feet (185')
West of the Southwest corner of Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition;
thence North parallel with the West line of said Addition one
thousand fifty -six and five hundredths feet (1056.051); thence
Northwesterly two hundred seventy -eight and sixty -five hundredths
feet (278.65') along a tangential.curve to the left, having a
radius of three hundred sixty and thirty -nine hundredths feet
(360.39'); thence Northerly three hundred thirty -four and
eighty -one hundredths feet (334.81') along a reverse curve,
having a radius of three hundred four and fifty -nine hundredths
feet (304.59'); thence Northeasterly along a line tangent to
last described curve and along the center line of Lincoln Drive
as platted in Interlachen Hills, a distance of one hundred feet
(100') and there terminating.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 20, 1977, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of June, 1977.
Deputy City Clerk
OA'�_
MEMORANDUM `
TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, Assistant Sanitarian
RE: Proposed Amendment to Ordinance No. 311
In reviewing the question of whether the amendment relating to the dog
enclosures should be retroactive or not, I would like to offer the fol-
lowing reasons why I believe that the amendment should be retroactive.
The request for the dog enclosure amendment resulted from the numerous
complaints we receive about the placement and maintenance of dog enclosures.
The dog enclosure will concentrate the activities of the animal in a
confined space and,as a result, the odors, flies, and noise generated
from such an enclosure places an unreasonable burden on the adjoining
property owner. Presently, we are aware of offensive dog enclosures at
the following locations: 4609 West 62nd Street; 4140 West 44th Street, 6609
Nordic Drive; 5713 Vernon Avenue; and 5828 Olinger Boulevard. These and
other existing locations will not be corrected unless the amendment is
retroactive and will continue to be a nuisance for the residents living
next to them.
This amendment will not require that an individual wishing to construct a
dog enclosure apply for a permit. Consequently, we will not be aware of
a dog enclosure until we observe the construction of an enclosure or a
neighbor complains about an enclosure being constructed or causing a nui-
sance. With this in mind, it may be very difficult to determine whether
a non - complying enclosure was constructed prior to the adoption of this
amendment or not. This would require that the enforcing officer document
the construction date of the enclosure and may involve additional staff
time appearing in court to gain compliance.
To comply with this amendment, the property owner will be required to move
the enclosure to comply with the 20 -foot setback from the rear and side
property lines and also screen the enclosure. However, the property owner
may enclose the entire rear yard for the purpose of keeping a dog. It
is felt that by enclosing the entire rear yard, one is not concentrating
the nuisances within a small area and,as a result,the effects of enclosing
the dog will be less of a nuisance for the adjoining property owner. By
using this alternative, the dog owner should not be unduly inconvenienced.
DAV:nr
6 -16 -77
o�
III. New Business:
•�•. Subdivision
S -77 -9
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
June 1, 1977
James M. Wilson's First Addition. James M. Wilson.
Generally located south of West 54th Street at Zenith
Avenue.
Refer to: attached graphics, June 2, 1976, Pl.an.aing
Commission minutes, and subdivision dedi-
cation report.
Approximately one year ago the Planning Commission reviewed a similar
subdivision of this property entitled "Erickson Addition.." At that time,
the Planning Commission recommended approval of the subdivision contingent
on dedication of the flood plain portion of the site. Following the Planning
Commission meeting, the proponent withdrew his request for a subdivision
based on a disagreement with the required parkland dedication. Since that
time, staff has worked with the owner of the subject property in order to
agree upon proper park -land dedication. After long discussion, the owner and
staff have agreed that a dedication of .the strip of land 100 feet upland of
Minnehaha Creek'would be an appropriate dedication in conjunction with the
subdivision. This dedicated area has been identified as Outlot 1 an the pro-
posed James M. Wilson's First Addition.
The proponent is also requesting the further vacation of the west one -
half of Zenith Avenue from 120 feet south of 54th Street to Minnehaha Creek.
The western one -half of Zenith Avenue from 54th Street to 120 feet southerly
has been previously vacated.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and peti-
tion for street vacation with the following conditions:
.1. Dedication of Outlot 1 to the City of Edina.
2. No fill, structures, or obstructions shall be placed below elevation 853
without the issuance of a special flood plain permit from the City and the
approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
GH:nr
5 -25 -77
EDINA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
May 23, 1977
Wilson's First Addition
Refer to: attached graphics.
Staff has been working with the owner of the subject property for several
years in order to formulate a workable subdivision. Of particular con-
cern was the proximity of Minnehaha Creek, the location of the flood plain
of the creek (el. 853), and the topography of the site.
Recently,:the owner agreed to dedicate to the City a strip of land extend-
ing 100 feet upland from Minnehaha Creek. This area is identified as
Outlot 1 on the proposed subdivision.
The proponent is also requesting the vacation of the west one -half of Zenith
Avenue from 120 feet south of 54th Street to Minnehaha Creek. The western
one -half of Zenith Avenue from 54th Street to 120 feet southerly has been
previously vacated.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat and
petition for street vacation with the following conditions:
1. The dedication of Outlot 1 to the City of Edina.
2. No fill, structures, or obstructions shall be placed below elevation 853
without the issuance of a special flood plain permit4 from the City and the
approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
GH:nr
5 -19 -77
�B L O C k
2
I.
/ LOT fo LOT 5
LOT 4
LOT 3
LOT
� '.
LOT �
-- .:._.. .. ...._ ..n
I
:..._.
....
WH I TE
I NVE57MENIT
CO('I✓I PAN Y"S
7t'
147'
�
120-
-PC'
1
FAr'
u
O
�'
oti
CIO
A
BOA
o$
HIDDEN
s VALLEY
--�20'
'Y
p
4
317'
STREET VACATION
STREET AS VA-ATC0
yoPROPOSED
164,
159'
ZPn W? Ave. S. Cos p/a t tool) 'r 525 . ......
w
Subdivision No.
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME:9%'i�5
LAND SIZE: "/ %� O LAND VALUE:
(By: Date: )
The developer of this subdivision. has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
B. dedicate D of the land o .
C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As 'a result of-applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5$ of
land dedicated)
1: If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
E3_ If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or w ill be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
El 2.
II
S -76-11 Erickson Addition. Generally located south of W. 54th Street at
Zenith Avenue.
Mr. Luce stated the proposed one -lot single family subdivision includes an
unplatted piece of property, part of Zenith Avenue which has been vacated, and part
of Minnehaha Creek. He recalled that about two years ago Mr.. Lazlo Fulop proposed
to vacate Zenith Avenue and request several variances to allow the construction of
a house on the property. In connection with that proposal, the City Council at that
time required the dedication of the rear portion of the property for flood plain
purposes to prevent any construction in the flood plain or. adjacent to the creek.
Mr. Fulop did not complete the subdivision needed to create a buildable lot,
incorporating the vacated portion of Zenith Avenue, and to dedicate the rear portion
of the property to the City of Edina.
Mr. Luce stated the necessary subdivision is now being requested by Mr. Ronald
Erickson, who would like to design and construct a house facing W. 54th Street and
dedicate the rear portion of the property ( Outlot A) as previously requested by the
City Council. He recommended the proposed plat be approved contingent on the dedica-
tion of Outlot A.
After brief discussion, Mr. G. Johnson moved the preliminary plat of "Erickson
Addition" be approved as presented, contingent on the dedication of Outlot A to the
City of Edina for flood plain purposes. Mr. C. Johnson seconded the motion. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
V4,; PLAPW NG REQUEST S-76-11 (ER I CKSON ADDITION)
Mr. Rosland reviewed Planning Request S -76 -11 generally located south
of West 54th Street at Zenith Avenue. Mr. Rosland recommended that since
this piece of property abuts to an existing park, York Park, that the Park
Board accept the land dedication per the planning dedication report.
Mrs.'Lonsbury moved to accept the land dedication as set forth in
Planning .'Request S- 76 -11.. Mrs. Shaw seconded and the motion was approved.
1ERICKSON ADDITION PREL I'MINARY PLAT WITHDRA[•N BY PROPONENT. Council was advised
that the developer of Erickson Addition had withdrawn his request for preliminary
plat approval for property located South of W. 54th Street at Zenith Ave. No
formal action was taken.
6 -1 -77 Planning Commission Minutes, page 6
Mr. Dunn, City Engineer, said the sewer plan .'on't be changed.by. this
Statement because the plat, was adopted by the Metropolitan Waste Control
Commission 5 -6 years ago and was agreed to by Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Runyan moved for acceptance of the Systems Statement with the
comments noted in the staff report. Mr. S. Hughes seconded the motion. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
2. Subc?_vision Villa View Ad,"Liticn. : rk Z. Jonea Company. Gen -
S -77 -3 erally located at the south end of Oxford Avenue and
north of Villa View Apartments.
Mr. Lewis indicated the proponent requested the proposed subdivision be
continued to the July 6, 1977, meeting. The Commission generally agreed. No fur-
ther action taken.
3. Lot Division Ronald Zamansky. Tracts A and B, R.L.S. No. 1278.
LD -77 -10 6600 Normandale Road.
Mr. G. Hughes said the'propexty in question was located in the southwest
quadrant of 66th Street and Highway 100. It is presently a registered land survey
with two tracts, A and B. He further said the proponent is requesting
permission to move the present division line between the two tracts of land
40 feet easterly to provide for an additional side yard area for the structure on
Tract A. Staff recommended approval because the division would provide additional
desirable side yard area for the structure on Tract A.
Mr. C. Johnson moved for approval of the request for the reasons stated
in the st,,�ff report. Mr. G. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Motion rried.
h. Subr?ivision James r:. jiilson's First Addition. James M. Wilson. Gen -
S-77-9 erally located south of W. 54th Street at Zenith Avenue.
Mr. G. Hughes explained the general location of the proposed subdivision and
recalled that approximately one year ago the Planning Commission reviewed a similar
request for this property entitled "Erickson Addition." At that time, the.Com-
mission had recommended approval of the subdivision contingent upon dedication of
the flood plain portion of the site. Following this Planning Commission meeting,.
Mr. G. Hughes said, the proponent withdrew, his request due to a disagreement on the
requested parkland dedication. Since that time, however, staff has had several
meetings with the owner of the property and have come to an agreement on the
dedication of the area known as Outlot 1 of the proposed subdivision, which outlot
consists of a strip of land 100 feet u land o* Minnehaha Creek. He further said
Lot 1 of the subdivision would be used as a single family lot.
Mr. G. Hughes said the proponent also requested the further vacation of the
western half of Zenith Avenue from 120 feet south of West 54th Street to Minnehaha
Creek. The western half of Zenith Avenue from 54th Street to 120 feet southerly
had been vacated approximately one year ago.
Mr. G. Hughes said staff recommended approval of the requested subdivision
and petition for further street vacation of Zenith Avenue with the following con-
ditions:
n .1 A
6 -1 -77 Planning Commission Minutes, page 7
1. Dedication of Outlot 1 to the City of Edina.
2. No fill, structures, or obstructions shall be placed below elevation 853
without the issuance of a special flood plain permit from the City and the
approval of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
` Mr. G. Hughes further stated the house on Lot 1 would be located on the
front part of the site and would line up with the others in the area and can
be constructed with no flood plain encroachment.
Mr. Runyan moved for approval of the proposed subdivision and petition for
further street vacation with the conditions stated in the staff report. Mr. G.
Johnson seconded. All voted aye. Motion carried.
5. Lot Division Gregory D. Gustafson. Generally located south and
LD -77 -11 east of Vernon Avenue and west of Brookside Avenue
(Jerry's Enterprises)
Mr. G. Hughes showed the general location of the site and explained it
was located between Jerry's hardware and grocery store. Mr. G. Hughes noted
in the staff report that several months ago necessary parking, setback, and other
variances were granted to allow a proposed multi- tenant commercial building.
He said subsequently a building permit was granted and has since been extended
pending construction delays due to financial reasons.
Mr. G. Hughes said it has now become apparent that there are three mortgage
companies involved which require three distinct parcels for mortgage purposes.
He explained that the requested lot division proposed the consolidation of a
number of lots that presently exist on the site.
Mr. G. Hughes proceeded to show a graphic illustrating the present seven
separate parcels and their consolidation into three parcels. He then said staff
has discussed with the proponent the possibility of platting the property to
simplify the legal description; however, according to the ordinance, despite
the.apparent complexity of the division, a lot division does qualify in this
instance because no additional buildable lots are being created.
Staff recommended approval of the requested lot division in that it is only
a minor adjustment of the property lines and is consistent with the approved
construction plans for the site. Approval, however, should be contingent on the
attachment of Tract 3 to Tract B of Registered Land Survey No. 1393.
Mr. Greg Gustafson was present and said the lot division would affect no
other property owners other than the one concerned, Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
He further said they applied for a lot division rather than a plat because of
.financial reasons and lack of time.
Mr. Kremer moved for approval of the proposed division for the reasons stated
by the staff and with the contingency as stated in the staff report. Mr. Runyan
seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
6. Subdivision Russell R. Wilson Subdivision of Lot 6, Prospect Hills
S -77 -10 First Addition. Generally located west of Dublin Road
and north of Kerry Road.