Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-09-12_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 12, 1977 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of A--;gust 15, 1977, approved as submitted or amended by motion of , seconded :.y RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS - EDINA WOMEN "S SOFTBALL TEAM . PRESENTATION OF 1978 BUDGET I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.Presentation by Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceeds, 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass (Continued from 8/1/77) A. Grading and Graveling Improvement No. P -C -124 - Amundson Ave. from Cahill Road to Dewey Hill Road B. Street Improvement No. P -BA -226 - Amundson Ave. from Cahill Road to Dewey Hill Road C. Grading &.Graveling Improvement No.. P -C -126 -. ",Delaney Blvd. from Dewey Hill Road to W. 78th St. D. Street Improvement No. P -BA -227 - Delaney Blvd. from Dewey Hill Road to W. 78th Street II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS Presentation by City Manager. Spect- ators heard. If Council wishes to proceeds, action by Resolution Ordering Assessments. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. (Continued from 8 /15/77) A. Street Improvement No. BA -202 - Dovre Drive B. Street Improvement No. BA -206 - Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition C. Street Improvement No. BA -208 - Lanham Lane D. Street Improvement No. BA -212 - Dale Ave. between W. 56th and W. 57th Streets E. Street Improvement No. BA -215 - McCauley Terrace F. Street Improvement No. BA -216 - Glasgow Drive G. Watermain Improvement No. WM -270 - Western Edina .III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING MATTERS Affidavifs of Notice by Clerk. .Presenta- tion by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of Zoning Ordin- ance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions, Plats, Flood Plain Permits and Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass. A. Rauenhorst Corp. - NW Quadrant of France Ave. at W. 76th St. (Cont. from 8/15/77). 1. Zoning Change - First Reading - PID Planned Industrial District to C -1 Commercial District - Z -77 -12 (7/7/77) 2. Preliminary Plat Approval - Normandale Park Addition S- 77 -13- (7/7/77) B. Set Hearing Dates 1. Subdivision and Rezoning a. Peter Deckas. Deckas Addition. Generally located :at the southwest corner of Olinger Road and Vernon Avenue South.. R -1 Single Family Residence District to R -1 and R -2 Two Family Residence District - S -77 -18 and Z -77 -17 (9/7/77) IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION Presentation by Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable roll- call vote to pass. A. Alley East of France Ave. and between W. 55th Street and Hebrew.Cemetery (Continued from 8/15./77) V. AWARD OF BIDS A. Public Works Vehicles (Continued from 8/15/77) 1. Tractor Loader .2. Dump Trucks 3. Sewer Cleaning Machine Council,Agenda - -912/77 Page Two VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date B. Dutch Elm Reimbursement Policy (Continued,fr,om 8/15/77) C. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Position Paper and Annual Report(Cont. D. City Inspection of Hotels and Motels from 8/1/77) 1976 Audit F. Purchase of Xerox Machine G. Shade Tree Replanting Program H. Report on 200 -year Storm (August 30/31) I. Commission and Board Appointments J. Special Concerns of Mayor and Council K. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items 1. T.H. 100 /Crosstown Highway - Noise Attenuation Def.ice VII. COMMUNICATIONS A. Builtwell Construction, Inc. - Easement Vacation Request - Lots 2 &.3, B1. 1, Green _Hills `of Edina B. Allan W. Garrison - Easement Vacation Request - Valley View Road between Washington Ave. and County Road 18 C. Rainbow Development Co. - Appeal.of'Board of Appeals Decision VIII. RESOLUTIONS A.. Community Health Services Plan Approval IX. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE ".COUP r` X. FINANCE A. Liquor Fund.,as of 7/31/77 B. Claims Paid: Motion of seconded by for payment of the following claims per Pre -List: General, $197,524.98; Park, $2,335.56; Art Center, $4,043.46; Park Construction, $9,843.03; Pool, $2,335.83; Golf, $7,421.96; Arena, $6,360.91; Gun Range, $68.97; Water Fund, $18,890.23; Sewer Fund, $74,596.89; Liquor Fund, $110,724.09; Construction Fund, $45,325.56; Total, $479,471.47 :0 - J" M E M O R A N D U M TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager James Van Valkenburg, Mayor Edina City Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, Director of Park and Recreation Department DATE: August 12, 1977 SUBJECT: DUTCH ELM DISEASE REIMBURSEMENT POLICIES TO PRIVATE HOME OWNERS IN EDINA The City of Edina will reimburse up to 50% for the removal of each tree, not to exceed $100.00. EXAMPLE: If a tree costs $200.00 to remove, the home owner will. receive $100.00. If a tree costs $250.00 to remove, the home owner would still receive only $100.00. The State of Minnesota helps with this subsidy program by reimbursing the City of Edina $37.00 of the $100.00 — the City of Edina pays $63.00 of the $100.00. The State of Minnesota has reduced its subsidy from 45% to 37 %. eR.eO plb - !-� A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina and functions as the official Board of Health of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of public health services on the local level throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Edina has reviewed the plan for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina and recommends its approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this selfsame plan and finds it consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory Board of Health and as expressed by the citizens of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE.CITY OF EDINA IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the Community Health Services Plan for the City of Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1977. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 12, 1977, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 13th day of September, 1977. City Clerk b -1a ib RF.R(1T.TTTT0N BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request the Hennepin County Board to revoke the old alignment of County Road 39 from County Road 18 to Washington Avenue and to turn back the right -of -way to the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1977. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 12, 1977, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 26th day of September, 1977. City Clerk f/ �/�cx�e�' el�c�u -�.i �#' is%— x.26 LIA er do (�e.c,omrrl�.n� ��ar�o,� �a���rl �SSIle- P- RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, during the 1977 JEP Edina Slo -Pitch Softball Season, sixteen young s of an Edina Women's Softball Team, sponsored by Country Club Markets, under the able direction of Coach Larry Kallin, have continued to exemplify the highest goals of good sportsmanship and outstanding proficiency; and WHEREAS, the team efforts have been rewarded by winning the Edina Women's playoffs championship and by being the first Edina Women's Softball Team to win the AA Womens Recreational. State - Tournament; and WHEREAS, during this past softball season, these young ladies have represented Edina in the highest manner: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council that the outstanding accomplishments of the Country Club Markets Softball Team deserve the sincere gratitude of the citizenry of Edina for the exemplary manner in which the team has conducted itself and for the great credit the team has brought to the commun- ity; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that appropriate copies of this resolution be presented to Jennifer Aanestad, Marc( Amble, Patty Bergren, Gail Berkley, Sue Berstein, Jackie Burger, Leigh Ann Clemmer, Kitty Cress, Kris Duryea, Sue Griebenow, Sue Huff, Cristi Hulse, Finny Johnston, Karen Oelschlaeger, Susan Pudvan, Cassie Spokes, and to Coach Larry Ka 11 in. RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, during the 1977 Edina Adult Slo -Pitch Softball Season, sixteen young ladies-of an Edina Women's Softball Team, sponsored by Country Club Markets, under the able direction of Coach Larry Kallin, have continued to exemplify the highest goals of good sportsmanship and outstanding pro- ficiency; and WHEREAS, the team efforts have been rewarded by winning the Edina Women's playoffs championship and by being the first Edina Women's Softball Team to win the AA Womens Recreational State Tournament; and WHEREAS, during this past softball season, these young ladies have repre- sented Edina in the highest manner; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council that the out- standing accomplishments of the Country Club Markets Softball Team deserve the sincere gratitude of the citizenry of Edina for the exemplary manner in which the team has conducted itself and for the great credit the team has brought to the community; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that appropriate copies of this resolution be pre- sented to Jennifer Aanestad, Marcy Amble, Patty Bergren, Gail Berkley, Sue Berstein, Jackie Burger, Leigh Ann Clemmer, Kitty Cress, Kris Duryea, Sue Griebenow, Sue Huff, Christi Hulse, Finny Johnston, Karen Oelschlaeger, Susan Pudvan, Cassie Spokes, and to Coach Larry Kallin. ADOPTED this 12th day of September, 1977. James Van Valkenburg, Mayor (official Publication) CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR ASSESSMENTS STREET IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -202, BA -206, BA -208, BA -212, BA -215, BA -216 WATERMAIN 270 EDINA CITY COUNCIL. will meet at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, .Edina Minnesota, on Monday, August 15, 1977, at 7 :00 p.m. to hear and pass upon all objections, if any, to the following proposed assessments. These assessments are now on file in the office of the Edina City Clerk and open to public inspection. Assessments on the following will be payable in ten equal in- stallments over a period of ten (10) years with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of the resolution levying the assessment to December 31, 1978: 1. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -202 Dovre Drive from Parkwood Lane.to Lincoln Drive The area proposed to be assessed includes Lot 1 and westerly 55 feet of Lot 2, Block 1; Lot 3 and Lot 2, except the westerly 55 feet thereof, Block 1; Lot l and Lot 2, except the east 60 feet thereof, Block 2; Lot 3 and east 60 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Nine Mile North 2nd Addition. Lot 1', Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 3; Lots l thru 9. Block 4; Lots l thru 12, Block 5; Lots 2 and 3, .Block 6, Parkwood Knolls Addition. Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 2nd Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 3rd Addition. Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 4th Addition. Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 3 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2; Lots l and 2, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 5th Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 6th Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 7th Addition. Lots l thru 9, Block 1; Lots 13 thru 17, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 2, Parkwood Knolls 8th Addition. Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlot 4, Parkwood Knolls 9th Addition. Lot 1, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 10th Addition. Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots l thru 6, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 4; Parkwood Knolls .11th Addition. Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1, Parkwood Knolls 12th Addition. Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 2; 'Lots 1 thru 10, Block 3; Lots l thru S,'Block 4, Lot 1, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 13th Addition. Lot 1, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 14th Addition. Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1; Lot 1 Block 2, Lots 1 thru 8, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition. Lots l thru 13, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4,'Block 3, Parkwood Knolls 16th Addition. Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 9, Block 4, Parkwood Knolls 17th Addition. Lots 1 thru 4. Block l; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 4; Lots 1 thru 14, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition. Lots 1 thru 8, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Walnut Ridge 3rd Addition. Lots 1 thru 6, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 2, Malibu Heights Addition. Lots 1 thru 12, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3; Outlot A,. and Parcel 9000,.Edina Green Addition. 2. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -206 All streets in Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3; Lots 1 thru 12, Block 4, Lots 1 thru 14, Block 5, Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition. 3. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -208 Lanham Lane from South line of M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to Fleetwood Drive The area proposed to be assessed includes Lot 3, Block. 1; Lot 1, Block 3; M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills Addition. Lots 1 thru 10, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 7,.Block 2, M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition 4. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -212 Dale Avenue from West 56th Street to West 57th Street The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1; and Lot 5 and North half of Vacated Street, Block 1; Lots l thru 6, Block 3, Melody Knolls 6th Addition; Lot 2, Block 5, Melody Knolls 3rd Addition 5. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -215 McCauley Terrace from McCauley Trail East to cul -de -sac The area proposed to be assessed includes Lot 2, Block 1, and Outlot A, McCauley Heights 4th Addition. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, and Outlot A, McCauley Heights 5th Addition I 6. CONSTRUCTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -216 Glasgow Drive from West 78th Street to cul -de -sac The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1; .Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, Heath Glen Addition -r 7. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN NO. 270 Easement line from Fabri -Tek Inc. to Lincoln Drive at South line of Nine Mile North Addition; Lincoln Drive from South line of Nine Mile North Addition to North line of Don -Car properties; Lincoln Drive from Londonderry Drive to South line of Nine Mile North Addition The area proposed Lo ;« assessed includes Lots 1 thru 3, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 6, Block 7, Lots 1 thru 6, Block 8; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 9; Also Outlots B & D, Londonderry Addition. Lots 1 and j 2, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 3, Londonderry j Replat. Lots 1 and 2,.Block 1, and Outlot A, Nine Mile North Addition. Lot 1 and West 55 feet of Lot 2; Lot 3 and Lot 2, except the West 55 feet thereof, Block 1; Lot 1 and Lot 2, except the East 60'feet thereof; Lot 3 and the East 60 feet of Lot 2, Block 2, Nine Mile North 2nd Addition. Parcels 4000 and 8000, Prestige 2nd Addition. Parcels 4030 and 4210, Section 31, Township 117, Range 21 (Now new plat Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition, Lots 13 thru 17, and Lots 21 thru 27, Block 1). Lots 1 thru 12, Block l; Lots 1 thru 4, Block 2; Lot 1, Block 3, Outlot A and Parcel 9000, Edina Green Addition. First payment of these assessment will be payable with the takes for the year 1977, collectible in 1978. To each subsequent installment will be added interest at the same rate for one year on all unpaid installments. The owner of the property assessed for the above improvements may pay the whole of the assessment without interest to the City Treasurer on or before November 15, 1977, or make payment with accrued interest to the County Treasurer. Any owner may appeal the assessment to the District Court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk of the City of Edina within twenty (20) days after the adoption of the assessment by the City Council, and by filing such notice with the District Court within ten (10) days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, the City of Edina has adopted standards and guidelines for deferring special assessments against homestead property owned by persons 65 years of age or older for whom payment would be a hardship. To obtain deferment, application must be filed with the City Assessor's office by the close of business on the last business day before the City Council meeting set out in the first paragraph of this notice, For further information and application forms, please call or visit the City Assessor's office. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun on August 3, 1977. Please send us 14 Affidavits of publication. � n 91 9 a� �� t 177 ra 41y, �z 461, _ oo, "®r/z,-ct- �j tj�,,7t NELSON'S MR. BIG FAMILY RESTAURANTS, INC. 3655 Hazelton Road Edina, MN 55424 (612) 831 -5159 September 2, 1977 Mr. James Van Valkenberg Mayor of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Mr. Mayor: My letter is in reference to the application for re- zoning of the property located at 76th Street and France Avenue owned by the Rauenhorst Corporation. If this site is approved for re-zoning it is my understanding that General Mills intends to build a rest - aurant at that location. I have been informed that the planning staff is not in favor of this proposal and the planning commission has denied the re- zoning. I favor that position. Several years ago I discussed with the city building a restaurant along France Avenue. At that time two arguments against my proposal were given. One, the traffic flow along France would be .further conjested by small parcel development and second that a'restaurant didn't fit.the S.E. Edina plan for'the overall development of the area. It seems to me those arguments are even more valid today. France Avenue has more traffic than it can currently handle and the flow of traffic would be further hindered by this type of use. In addition, according to my information other restaurant companies intend to locate on France Avenue if re- zoning is granted to General Mills and added traffic could create a safety hazard to current users of France Avenue. I strongly urge you to stay with the existing plan and deny this application for re- zoning. TSin rely, David H. Nelson President Nelson's Mr. Big Family Restaurants, Inc. DHN /sms RIN PLANMNG / TRANSPORTATION / ENGINEERING /ARCHnWrLSE September 2, 1977 Mayor James VanValkenberg and the Edina.City Council Edina City Hall Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council: .At the Council meeting on Monday, August 15th, 1977, we discussed.the validity and desirability of a restaurant use in a planned industrial park or a conventionally zoned industrial district. As a result of that discussion we were given the opportunity to submit in writing our views on the subject.. The Urban Land Institute (ULI) in its book the Industrial Development Handbook notes the following: "In the early years of exclusive 'industrial zoning and industrial park planning, not only were the needed service commercial uses conspicious by their absence but frequently they were excluded by legislative mandate. Currently a trend toward integration of service commercial uses for the employees is emerging. Fast -food services, banks, service stations, auto repair facilities, barber and beauty shops, dry cleaners, commercial recreation facilities, medical and dental offices, and health clubs are obvious uses for inclusion in an industrial setting." Today it is not uncommon for well planned industrial parks to provide for an integration of land use that produces a mutual benefit. The first non - industrial uses to be provided within the planned industrial park were most likely public and semi - public uses, such as fire and police stations. This represented a logical extension of public services required by industry and typically provided by the municipality. More recently communities have been concerned that industrial development be a positive factor from the fiscal environ- mental and social viewpoint and, therefore, have begun to integrate RATHER. RW .R06E,V40L%- BD..WWG.GARDNER.ING 7101 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MNNEAPOLIS,MR 55435 PHONE 612/831 -7300 Mayor James September 2, Page 2 VanValkenberg and the Edina City Council' 1977 less obvious uses. It is not uncommon for industrial parks to provide recreational use, commercial use and in some instances, residential use in an attempt to provide a unique setting for marketing purposes and a socially oriented.amenity package for the employees. The reason for the increase in land use integration in the planned industrial park stems from a number of sources in both the public and private sectors. A perceived need by the developer (either public or private) for additional amenities to attract potential firms is one obvious reason to offer a hotel site with restaurant facilities and .landscaped grounds. A,socially concerned municipal government may insist on recreational facilities and /or a day care center for the employees; a natural market demand can be created for goods and services simply because of the number of people working in a planned industrial park if it is of sufficient size. Whatever the reason for the demand to integrate land uses within an industrial park, there are some quantifiable benefits that can accrue to the municipality. For a number of years planners an'd economists have been aware of a phenomenon known as "economic leakage ". On a'. regional scale this "leakage" is the inability of the region to capture or•hold all of the economic activity that is necessary for it to function. This inability causes capital to be spent outside of the region thereby reducing the number of times it turn's over locally and thereby causing a reduction in total economic productivity. On a City scale this "leakage" may be the inability of the.City to take advantage of the economic potential located within it's taxing jurisdiction. The planned industrial park is a generator of secondary economic potential. That is,because of it's ability to draw large numbers of employees to a given location, it thereby causes a demand to exist for goods and services related to the needs of the worker. Should the municipality in which the park is located be unable or unwilling _to provide mechanisms for private enterprise to meet the needs, those needs will be met elsewhere. If the "elsewhere" be outside of the municipality's taxing jurisdiction the leakage will be taxes, and tertiary economic potential, and the cause of excessive travel by the employees located within the park. The inability to capture economic potential can also cause quantifi- able negative impacts. For example, if 2000 additional automobile trips (5 miles) are needed per day to meet employee needs, such as lunch or other services, approximately 683 pounds of vehicle emissions per weekday will be needlessly emitted. This along with the addition- al congestion obviously has a negative impact on the community. Mayor James VanValkenberg and the Edina City Council September 2, 1977 Page 3 If a municipality tries to capture the economic potential in a non- planned manner the result may be worse than the leakage and negative impacts of not capturing the potential at all. Sound planning based on economic, environmental and social factors must be employed if effective land use integration is to be achieved. According to the Urban Land Institute many examples of well integrated land use within an industrial park exist. The Nonconnah Park in Memphis recognized the need for a hotel from the outset. The .hotel provided rooms, meeting facilities, restaurants, and limited shopping facilities for both employees and visitors to the park. At the Irvine Industrial Complex East, six commercial sites have been planned within the 2068 acre industrial area. Each site is 30 acres or less in size and has been designed to meet the limited shopping and restaurant needs of adjacent industrial uses. This has proven so successful that the original Irvine Park parcels by- passed during the initial phases of development are now being used for restaurants and other limited commercial activities.. Throughout the country the expansion of office buildings and office uses in industrial parks is proceeding rapidly. Many industrial parks are becoming hydrid employment centers with up to half or more of the total site occupied by offices. This trend suggests an increasing demand for supportive commercial activity. In 1974 the Association of American Geographers in it's publication Major Job- Providing Organization and Systems of Cities confirmed this. Drawing on work. done by Armstrong in 1972 and Tornquist.in 1973, it .reported that the United States "is becoming white collar at a faster rate than commonly believed" and that in "view of occupational shifts transpiring in advanced economies it may be seriously questioned whether the traditional approach to industrial location theory and development (type -- single purpose) need not be replaced." Within the Minneapolis -St.. Paul region there are a number of examples of contemporary approaches to the industrial development. The Minneapolis Housing and Redevelopment Authority as long ago as 1967 began to provide integrated land uses in it's redevelopment of industrial areas. The Seward Industrial area in southeast Minneapolis has incorporated commercial uses (including restaurants) into a planned industrial park. The recently approved North Washington Industrial Park (NWIP) has taken advantage of a distinctive physical setting to provide for recreational land uses along the Mississippi River and commercial uses within identified commercial service nodes; a restaurant, The Broadway Station, was the first service use within the Industrial Park. Mayor James VanValkenberg and the Edina City Council September 2, 1977 Page 4 In Brooklyn Center the developers of the Earle Brown Farm Industrial Park have taken advantage of the "white collar" trend to incorporate a public restaurant into a highrise office building. Additionally, they have planned for a 250,000 square foot convenient shopping facility located in the center of the park. The inclusion of restaurant and some commercial service uses in a planned industrial park provides more than a "nice touch ". If properly planned they can enhance the community's quality, of life by providing: • Services to employees and visitors. • An increased economic capture rate for the municipality in which they are located. • Additional taxes. • A reduction in automobile emissions and congestion by providing convenience, reducing travel. • Utilization of odd lots or small parcels. of land that are not marketable to the industrial user. • A unique opportunity for adaptive reuse of old industrial buildings. With the trend toward a closer relationship between commercial and industrial uses, the commercial facility has an important place in the modern industrial park. With good planning the integration of land uses will prove beneficial to the community that has a high quality of life as a goal. The following table is the result of a sample of, local communities M that we undertook that allows free- standing restaurants to be located within either a planned industrial park or a conventionally zoned industrial district. Our methodology for this survey was. to phone theo:n_i,ng administrator or planner for a sample number of municipalities t,gs''determineF whether or not each city allowed a restaurant as a' principal use or with a special use permit. Of eighteen municipalities contac'ted.;-, only four excluded restaurants within zoned industrial areas. ' 1i1 Mayor James September 2, Page 5 VanValkenberg and the Edina City Council' 1977 We offer this information for your consideration. Hopefully it will be of assistance in your review of the provisions for this type of integrated land use in Edina. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this information to you. Warm Regards, Xer NGROSE OLSFELD- JARVIS- GARDNER, INC. J �rvd i s Principal Vic President PEJ:nb Enc. Sample Twin Cities Suburban Communities Which Permit Restaurants in Industrial Zones Special Use Permit City Required W Other Conditions Richfield X St. Louis Park X Golden Valley X Sitdown only; no fast food. Robbinsdale X Brooklyn Center X In I -1 zone only. Fridley X Columbia Heights X Mendota Heights X Unless in general B2 zone. Eden Prairie X Hopkins Planning review. Plymouth Only as an integrated development. Brooklyn Park I and I -2 sitdown okay. I -2 fast food requires special use. Coon Rapids Only as a service to industrial area. Oakdale 0 BIBLIOGRAPHY Corporate Report, July, 1977, p. 75 Hughes, J.W. (1977) "Methods of Housing Analysis Techniques and Case Studies ", Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University, pp. 227 -230. Malinowski, Z.S. (1963) "The Place of Small Business in Planned Industrial Districts ", University of Connecticut. Minnesota Department of Economic Development (1977) "Minnesota Industrial Development News ", January. Pred, A.R. (1974) "Major Job - Providing Organizations and Systems of Cities ", Association of American Geographers, Washington, D.C., p. 2. Urban Land Institute (1975) "Industrial Development Handbook ", Community Builders Handbook Series, Washington D.C., pp. 206 -209. (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 15, 1977 One (1) Four Wheel Drive Tractor Loader (Minimum 411 Cu. Ft. Size Rating) One (1) Truck Mounted High Velocity Sewer Cleaning Machine Two (2) Dump Trucks with Boxes SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St. at 11:00 A.M., Monday, August 15, 1977, and the Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 15, 1977, to consider bids, being for the following: One (1) Four Wheel Drive Tractor Loader (Minimum 4k Cu. Ft. size rating) One (1) Truck Mounted High Velocity Sewer Cleaning Machine Two (2) Dump Truck with Boxes Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing what is covered by the.bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. Bids must be in conformance with specifications which are available at the Edina City Hall. No bids will be considered unless securely sealed and filed with the City Engineer before 11:00 A.M., Monday, August 15, 1977, and accompanied by bid bond or cashier's or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at least ten (10) percent of the total net bid. The City Council reserves the right to reject any or all bids or any part of any bid. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Florence B. Hallberg City Clerk Please publish in Edina Sun on August 3, 1977 Please send us 3 Affidavits of Publication 'ri-I .1VO 14 August 24, 1977 To: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager Members of the Council From: Arlin Waelti, Para Legal Administrative Assistant d%k Subject: City Inspection of Hotels and Motels The attached agreement between the City of Edina and the Minnesota Commissioner of Health has the effect of conferring upon the City of Edina, and the environmental health staff specifically, the authority given it under Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.031 of inspecting hotels and motels pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157. The only facility that would presently come under this inspection authority would be the Biltmore Motel at 5212 Vernon Avenue. The agreement does allow the City to enact ordinances with more stringent requirements than contained in the above State statutory law. The agreement is substantially similar to agreements used by other munici- palities in the area and has already been reviewed and tentatively approved by the State Department of Health. It is my opinion that the agreement does protect the City's interests and is acceptable for approval. Mr. Ken Esse will be at the Council meeting to answer any questions re- garding this matter. attachment A G R E E M E N T THIS AGREEMENT, by and between the CITY OF EDINA (here- inafter referred to as the CITY) and the MINNESOTA STATE COMMIS- SIONER OF HEALTH (hereinafter referred to as the STATE), is en- tered into pursuant to the provisions of the Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.031 WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY has established a health department pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 145, and WHEREAS, the STATE as set out in the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157, and rules promulgated thereunder, has the responsi- bility for the inspection and licensing of hotels, motels, boarding houses, lodging houses, restaurants, places of refresh- ment and resorts, and WHEREAS, the CITY has an environmental health staff competent to inspect hotels, motels, boarding and lodging houses, restaurants, places of refreshment, and resorts, and to enforce ordinances and statutes pertaining thereto, NOW, THEREFORE, the STATE and the CITY jointly agree as follows: -1. The STATE hereby delegates to the CITY and the CITY hereby accepts responsibility, as designated agent, for per- forming the functions assigned to the STATE by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157, and rules promulgated thereunder, of licensing and inspecting hotels, motels, boarding houses, lodging houses, restaurants, places of refreshment, and resorts located in the CITY, as well as enforcement of applicable CITY ordinances pertaining thereto. Inspections shall be made by the CITY on the basis of the licensing requirements established in applicable rules as de- fined in Section 8 of this Agreement. The CITY will also make timely follow -up inspections to provide for compliance with ap- plicable regulations as defined in Section 8 of this Agreement. 2. The CITY will prepare inspection reports which contain a statement of any violations, orders for corrections of violations, and set dates of compliance, which reports shall be available for inspection by the STATE at reasonable times. 3. The CITY shall review and approve plans and specifi- cations for proposed new and remodeled, licensed establishments to determine in advance compliance with applicable regulations. Reports to these reviews will be promptly transmitted to the STATE. The CITY will make such submitted plans and specifications avail- able to the STATE upon request. 4. The CITY will perform the inspection, licensing, enforcement, and other services agreed to herein without cost to the STATE. The CITY will provide the STATE with a current list of licensed establishments and will make inspection reports avail- able to the STATE upon request. 5. On the effective date of this Agreement, the STATE will discontinue the issuance of licenses, the revocation of licenses, the conduct of hearings or initiation of court actions, or other enforcement actions under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157. The STATE will discontinue all inspection activity except the inspection activity required in Section 6. The STATE will provide, without cost to the CITY, orientation and consultation on problems or other supportive services for the staff of the CITY. The STATE will provide, without cost to the CITY, consultation and advice on rules promulgated by the STATE which are to be en- forced by the CITY. 6. The STATE shall annually review the CITY's program to determine its continued compliance with this Agreement. An- nual review criteria shall include average establishment demerit -2- score, interpretr.Ition of requirements, administrative procedures (completeness of records, frequency of inspections, and enforce- ment procedures), staff training, industry training, program support, plan review, investigation and reporting of food -borne outbreaks, and supportive facilities and measures.(laboratory facilities and services, field equipment, preparedness for food- borne disease outbreaks). Any deficiencies in the CITY'S program shall be reported to the CITY. The minimum acceptable standard for the CITY'S performance will be a level of inspection and service not less than currently exists within the CITY at the time of execution of this agreement. 7. The CITY shall maintain at least the same ratio of sanitarians per establishment that existed during 1977 to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. A Food Service Sanitation Survey Officer certified by the U. S. Department of Health, Edu- cation, and Welfare .shall certify that the CITY'S sanitarians are qualified pursuant to certification procedures established by the STATE and without cost to the CITY. 8. The CITY agrees to adopt ordinances, with an effec- tive date of not later than January 1, 1978, establishing standards for licensed establishments at least equivalent to the minimum standards established by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157, and rules promulgated thereunder, as such statutes and rules are amended from time to time. Nothing in this paragraph may be construed to prohibit the CITY from enacting ordinances with more stringent requirements than those contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 157, and rules promulgated thereunder. 9. The Agreement shall continue to be effective until terminated by either party. Termination by either party may, be accomplished by notifying the other party in writing of inten- tion to terminate the Agreement and that -such termination shall occur 180 days after the receipt of such notice. In addition, -3- if they CITY'S pi•agram is found by the STATE; to be deficient by the criteria and standards set forth in'Section 6 hereof, but under such conditions as do not create a public healtli hazard, the STATE may place the CITY'S program and the Agreement on a provisional status for a period of six months, and said provision- al status may be extended by the STATE. In any event, the STATE may terminate the Agreement immediately by written notice if a deficiency in the CITY'S program results in the creation of public health hazards. 10. This Agreement may be amended by the CITY and the STATE at any time. 11. This Agreement is effective on January 1, 1978. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officers as of this day of , 1977. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CITY OF EDINA By: Commissioner By ,Its Mayor, James VanValkenburg -4- Its City Manager, Warren Hyde 1.11A September 12, 1977 TO: City Manager FROM: Director of Public Works and City Engineer SUBJECT: Recommendations on purchase of Truck Mounted High Velocity Sewer Cleaning Machine and Four Wheel Drive Tractor Loader Bids received Monday, August 15, 1977. TRUCK MOUNTED HIGH VELOCITY SEWER CLEANING'MACHINE Bidder Bid Make Itasca Equipment $22,989 F. E. Myers Flexible Pipe Tool Co. $23,263 Flexible MacQueen_Equipment, Inc. $23,390 John Bean Recommend purchase from Flexible Pipe Tool Co. at $23,263. Low bid of Itasca Equipment does not meet specifications because hose reel is wider than 15" specified. Wider reel requires additional manpower to operate equipment. FOUR WHEEL DRIVE TRACTOR LOADER' Bidder Tri State Machinery Co. Case Power and Equipment Minneapolis Equipment Co.. Bid Make $5,300 Melroe $5,956 Case $7,839 Owatonna Recommend purchase from Case Power and Equipment at $5,956. Low bid does not meet specifications because it.does. not have a parking or emergency brake. Respectfully _submitted, Robert C. Dunn, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer RCD /lkw cc: A. Batko MEMO 12 September 1977 TO: The Honorable Mayor of Edina -James VanValkenburg The Honorable City Council City Manager - Warren Hyde FROM: Kenneth Rosland- Director of the Park and Recreation Department RE: DUTCH ELM REIMBURSEMENT POLICY So':far this year the Park and Recreation Department has received requests from City residents for shade tree removal subsidies totaling $26,003.60. as follows: 1976 Late Requests $ 172.50 January- September 12, 1977 $ 25,831.10 26;003.60 This figure is correct if one assumes the same subsidy program Edina had last year is in effect; That is, $100.00 per tree or 50% of the cost of removing a tree, whichever is less. Because the season for Oak Wilt and Dutch Elm Disease is now winding down, we now have most of the requests for 1977 recorded. Because the State Department of'Agriculture Shade Tree Division changed their matching funds ratio from 45% to 37 %, we feel the Council should take.another look at the costs affecting Edina for our subsidy program. The State has agreed to fund Edina up to $23,591.20 for sanitation costs incurred by the City during 1977 retroactive to January, 1977. Assuming that we are roughly 85% through the 1977 season for.tree removals, our projected costs are these: Total Subsidies for 1977 $ 29,904. -to residents Equipment $ 12,500 Edina_:Crews $ 22,500 Outside Contracts $ 10,000 -stump removal .- Foresters TOTAL. 74,904 37% of $ 63,760 equals our State match, $ 23,591.20. This means that to subsidize our residents as we did last year, we must spend an additional $ 11144.00 assuming our projections are close. The State has indicated that further funds may be available to Edina and other municipalities by means of a contingency .fund set up before the allocations. So far we have not been able to secure a definite commitment from the State as to what additional.amounts -might be forthcoming: OVER PLEASE... One problem is that the State has changed their minds frequently since the allocation process began. Rules have been changed midstream. The Director of the Shade Tree Division has changed during the process increasing confusion and causing delays. We hope that next year's program will operate more smoothly and that leadership will be more definite from the State. Thank you. Ken Rosland 44 Director of the Park and Recreation Department MEMO 12 September 1977 TO: The Honorable Mayor of Edina -James VanValkenburg The Honorable City Council City Manager- Warren Hyde FROM: Kenneth Rosland- Director of the Park and Recreation Department RE: DUTCH ELM REIMBURSEMENT POLICY So far this year the Park and from City residents for shade as foI lows: 1976 Late Requests January - September 12, Recreation Department has received requests tree removal subsidies totaling $26,003.60. $ 172.50 1977 $ 25,831.10 26 ;003.60 This figure is correct if one assumes the same subsidy program Edina had last year is in effect; That is, $100.00 per tree or 50% of the cost of removing a tree, whichever is less. Because the season for Oak Wilt and Dutch Elm Disease is now winding down, we now have most of.the requests for 1977 recorded. Because the State Department of'Agriculture Shade Tree Division changed their matching funds ratio -from 45% to 376, we feel the Council should take another look at the costs affecting Edina for our subsidy program. The State has agreed to fund Edina up to $23,591.20 for sanitation costs incurred by the City during 1977 retroactive to January, 1977. Assuming that we are roughly 85 %through the 1977 season for tree removals, our projected costs are these: Total Subsidies for 1977 $ 293,904 -to residents Equipment $ 12,500 �� f Edina_Crews $ 22,500 Outside Contracts $ 10,000 -stump removal - Foresters TOTAL 74,904 �v 37% of $ 63,760 equals our State match, $ 23,591.20. This means that to subsidize our residents as we did last year, we must spend an additional $ 11144.00 assuming our projections are close. 0 The State has indicated that further funds may be available to Edina and other municipalities by means of a contingency fund set up before the allocations. So far we have not been able to secure a definite commitment from the State as to what additional amounts might be':forthcoming:, ;) OVER PLEASE... r One problem is that the State has changed their minds frequently since the allocation process began. Rules have been changed midstream. The Director of the Shade Tree Division has changed during the process increasing confusion and causing delays. We hope that next year's program will operate more smoothly and that leadership will be more definite from the State. Thank you. Ken Rosland Director of the Park and Recreation Department e 'Qesidex {s Jon 2�{ .Jul 83 Auc 91 iZe�eS�l S � 2.S0 _ S�Z 161 1033 SOI y9y Oak,— __ _rotes -- - - - -- - - - - - -- - T6+a 1R?SiQIZIA4s agPacAect -sa Cbm ww6s I - i h � l gig; ble f� subsidy I.00ATION MAP � c 72 No ST- �qr— P, l'-1 I __j 76 T H subdivisaon zoning O cm Sim S-77-13 and REQUEST NUMBER: Z-77-12 LOCATION: N14 quadrant of W. 76th & France REQUEST: 3-lot Commercial (restaurant) Plat. PID to C-1 Commercial. . . le. 1 fl in yillgge planning depmr c131- village o - I colins e EDINA PLANNING C0.1.^IISSION STAFF REPORT July 6, 1977 II. Subdivision Rauenhorst Corporation. Normandale Park Addition. Tract L, 5 -77 -13 and R.L.S. No. 1129. Generally located at the N.W. quadrant of Rezoning W. 76th Street and France Avenue. PID Planned Industrial R -77 -12 District to C -1 Commercial District. Refer to: June 1, 1977, staff report, attached graphic, and attached letter. The Planning Commission will recall that the subject rezoning and subdivision was continued from the June 1, 1977, meeting in order to determine the possibility of'restricting the subject property to only restaurant uses. Attached is a letter from the City Attorney regarding such a possible restriction. In short, the attorney has indicated that either an ordinance amerdment'providing for special use permits or an amendment allowing restaurants in the PID zone are both legal alternatives. Ir_ subsequent conversations, the attorney advised that a rezoning to C -1 with a simple condition that the site only be used for restaurants would not be binding and v7ould not be advisable. As directed by the Commission, staff has also researched the possibility of allowing restaurants in the PID zone. The Office Building District section of the Zoning Ordinance notes that within office buildings having either a gross floor area of at least 402000 square feet or at least 200 full - time - employees, a limited amount of the building may be used for accessory purposes, including restaurants. Such restaurants, however, may not exceed 10 percent of the gross floor area. The Regional Medical District section allows such accessory uses; however, it does not require 200 employees and allows accessory uses to encompass 20 percent of the gross floor area. The South Edina Plan further states as an objective the requirement or provision of incentives to, office, industrial, or large apartment developers so that restaurants and other uses can be incorpor- ated in developments to capture or intercept possible travel. Staff thus be- lieves that it is appropriate to amend the PID section of the ordinance to allow restaurants as an accessory use. We would, however, recommend against allowing restaurants as a principle use based upon the items noted in the June.1, 1977, staff report. Staff has also prepared a graphic illustrating the locations of restaurants, lunchrooms, and vending services located in southeastern Edina. This graphic is attached. Recommendation: Based on the June 1, 1977, report, staff continues to recommend denial of the requested C -1 rezoning. Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission suggest to the City Council an ordinance amendment which would allow restaurant and other service - related facilities as accessory uses in multi- tenant offices located in the PID zone. Such office buildings should have at least 40,000 square feet of gross floor area. Further, the accessory use should en- compass not more than 10 percent of the gross floor area and should be located on the ground floor. Staff strongly urges that restaurants not be allowed as a principle use in the PID zone due to the precedence which would be established by such a decision. Staff also recommends against establishment of special or conditional use permits due to the administrative and enforcement problems which such permits create. CH:nr 6 -30 -77 EDIN'A P1-A NT,dC CW-2MISSION STAFF REPORT June 1, 1977 III, New Lusiness: �1 Subdivision Rauenhorst Corporation. Normandale Park Addition. S -77 -13 and Tract L, R.L.S. No. 1129. Generally located at the Rezoning northwest quadrant of West 76th Street and France Avenue. Z -77-12 PID Planned Industrial District to C -1 Commercial District. :Refer to: attached graphi <s, preliminary plat, traffic engineer report, and parkland dedication report. The proponents are requesting a rezoning from PID Planned Industrial District to C -1 Commercial District for a 3 -acre tract of land in the north- west quadrant of France Avenue and 76th Street. The subdivision also.requested would divide the tract into three lots of 44,460 square feet, 46,840 square feet, and 47,590 square feet. The proponents have also submitted a plan for a restaurant which is pro- posed to be located on-Lot 1 of the subdivision. The proponents have also indi- cated that similar restaurant uses are contemplated for Lots 2 and 3. Of paramount importance in the southeastern section of the city is the impact of traffic from various land uses on France Avenue and other roadways. Based upon this concern, the proponents have prepared a detailed traffic engin- eering report which is attached to your staff report. This report concludes that if an office building were constructed on the subject property (which is an allow- able use under-the current zoning classification) approximately 260 additional trips per hour would be generated during the peak hour of 4 to 5 further concludes that a restaurant use located on the subject property This report ., property would generate traffic primarily during its off -peak hours, thus reducing the traffic impact on France Avenue during the peak hour. This study further recommends and the proponents agree that access to the property will be via 76th Street. The proponents also indicated their intent to dedicate a strip of land abutting France Avenue for the purpose of constructing a right -turn lane on France Avenue just north of 76th Street. In reviewing the requested rezoning and supplementary material, staff wishes to make the following.points: 1. The South Edina Plan identifies this site for Planned Industrial uses. The subject property is presently zoned for Planned Industrial District. The DDIM -1 report entitled 494/100 Southdale Corridor Study, which was referred to in the proponent's traffic engineering study, anticipated industrial use for the subject property. 2. The C -1 Commercial District zoning requested by the proponents provided no assurances that the subject property will, in fact, be used for restaurant purposes. Among the ottler uses allowed in the C -1 district are retail stores, medical and dental facilities, as well as offices. In terms of allowable uses, setbacks, landscaping, and so forth, the C -1 zone is-much more per - tuissive than the present PID classification. 3. The City's Engineering Department has advised that when sanitary sewers were constructed in the Southeast portion of the city, such were designed based upon the land uses anticipated in the South Edina Plan. The Engineering Planning Comr:ussion Staff Report (Rauenhorst Corp.) Pace 2 June 1, 1977 Department has further advised that there is inadequate sanitary sewer capacity for restaurant uses in this area. - 4. The proponent's traffic engineering study indicates- the possibility of a 70,000 square foot office building on the subject property. Upon our review, we have determined that a 55,000 to 60,000 square foot office building is more likely in this location based upon lot coverage and parking require- ments. It is important to note that this traffic engineering study also assumes the worst possible PID development and the best possible C -1 development when analyzing the traffic impact resulting from the site. Again, the requested C -1 zoning does not guarantee that the best possible C -1 use will, in fact, be implemented. 5. The DMJM study recommends that further development in the Southdale Corridor area be restricted to minimize strict development and sprawl. . 6. Approval of the requested rezoning to C -1 would establish a precedence that would encourage further commercial development along France Avenue. Traffic impact resulting from such development would violate the concept contained in the South Edina Plan as well as the DMJM recommendations. Recommendation_: Staff recognizes several good features of the proposed rezoning: Restaurant uses would tend to generate traffic during off -peak hours; the proposed access of W. 76th Street and a right -turn land on France Avenue would facilitate a more desirable traffic flow in this area. However, staff recommends denial of the rezoning request for the following reasons: 1. The request is inconsistent and not in conformance with the South Edina Plan. 2. The requested C -1 zoning provides no assurances that the subject property will, in fact, be used only for restaurant purposes. Allowable C -1 uses such as retail commercial would be undesirable from a land use and traffic s, standpoint. 3. Adequate sanitary sewer capacity is not available for the proposed land use. 4. The requested.rezoning wculd set a precedent for strip commercial development on-vacant land abutting France Avenue on both the east and west sides. Such a'use would not be in conformance with the concepts contained in the South Edina Plan. CH: nr 5- 27 -77. DORSEY, WINDHORST, HANNAFORD, WHITNEY a HALLADAY 2300 FIRST NATIONAL DANK DU ILDING MILAN EAPOLiS,M IN N ESOTA 55402 16121 340 - 2600 CAEJLE: DOROW TELEX: 29 -0605 TELECOPIER: 16121 340 -2868 1468 W- FI:I;T NATIOUJ L DANK DUILOING S7 FIAUL.MINNESOTA 55101 16121 227 -6017 115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901 1507) 288 -3156 ° Mr. Warren C. Hyde Edina City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Warren: June 8, 1977 Re: General Mills's Proposal for Prototype Restaurant -- Northwest Quadrant, 76th Street and France Avenue N:C, R N " •- •._-:' r ° .AL • .., it _ R CTE fr R: o >[r C5 10�', rl R �T.• ,v \: ;li _ r fAJL J �C +EEFCR S:E.•:N E r w f •. ?; A A :w .v C Dnn CLIJS D ' i ^ .r. JR MAHD \r r, JR w"LIAM C BA?. /Oc. M ✓_nA[ L FwICHARJ TH_! i i EP:�,- •)I-a P ViTIp Wi :IA• R LOAN HK "AE: E BCE Si F'CHI:.D G S—SON PA? -OND A RE IiiER FAITH L OHMAN JOHN J TAILOR OAV:p A PANHCIN WILL IAM FEVPEL R09ERT J. SIIHnMAN JOHN 5 r,'33S THOMAS R MA,•,.ET ROBERT O FLOTTLN WILLIAM R NIB -S JOHN O. LEV:NC Rd -LIP ;LIP c. 60CLTER ROBERT J $TRUTH 9 PAIN[ 2300 FIRST NATIONAL DANK DU ILDING MILAN EAPOLiS,M IN N ESOTA 55402 16121 340 - 2600 CAEJLE: DOROW TELEX: 29 -0605 TELECOPIER: 16121 340 -2868 1468 W- FI:I;T NATIOUJ L DANK DUILOING S7 FIAUL.MINNESOTA 55101 16121 227 -6017 115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901 1507) 288 -3156 ° Mr. Warren C. Hyde Edina City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Warren: June 8, 1977 Re: General Mills's Proposal for Prototype Restaurant -- Northwest Quadrant, 76th Street and France Avenue On June 7 Peter Jarvis called me to ask if I had done anything relative to allowing restaurants as a special use within C -1 zoning districts. I advised him that I was ignorant of any request on the City's such work. He then advised me of the Planning Commission meetin held June 1 relative to the above matter and of the Planning g Commission's referral to me of the exploration of the City's ability to allow restaurants as a special use within a C -1 district. I subsequently spoke with Gordon Hughes concerning this matter. We discussed generally the use of special permits and another possible alternate, being the inclusion of restau- rants in the Planned Industrial District (this district being the present zoning district of the subject property). to Gordon that the use of special permits or the inclusionpofed restaurants in a PID would seem to me-policy decisions that . should be addressed by the City Council before any proposed zoning ordinance amendments are prepared for review by the Plan- ning Commission and eventual adoption by the Council. The Senior Citizen Residence District ordinance would seem to be a precedent for the General Mills proposal. In that case, a proposed development was the catalyst for an amendment to the zoning ordinance. The amendment was drafted without specific regard for the proposed senior citizen development, N:C, R N L• J K • CHAIR. 1,1. J.NES A f11 �?NA Il p,... CAA J wvin JAC,�Dy C;N D Cr •LS ;N fAJL J �C +EEFCR S:E.•:N E r w f •. ?; CAS C NI•cL J hn't':4::C EA. V [D'A•a fCr11C LL W' �A:1 N ": i % CC. JR. 1.1 A CI.., AS ^.N DA �a C HAIX F.O ?.RT A ::;S i ROHR J. J•�ES C B -. •Il!� H,aSON J P09CRf M139: GEORGE L CHA.MAN THOMAS D VAN; JAY F. COCA FR M^LFN YAR♦ A S TA.NLEY M REIN JAFg,r BRUCE D. 80LANOCR CHARLES L POrVZW t VEPLANC L ENOORf DENNIS P BVPATTI OF COUNSEL GEI)PGEANN EECIIER DONALD %EST ROBERT L Hrb91NS WALDO F NAROUART BAFRr D. GLAZER GEORGE (ANDERSON RLTCR S MC NORWON JOHN F. FIrIN On June 7 Peter Jarvis called me to ask if I had done anything relative to allowing restaurants as a special use within C -1 zoning districts. I advised him that I was ignorant of any request on the City's such work. He then advised me of the Planning Commission meetin held June 1 relative to the above matter and of the Planning g Commission's referral to me of the exploration of the City's ability to allow restaurants as a special use within a C -1 district. I subsequently spoke with Gordon Hughes concerning this matter. We discussed generally the use of special permits and another possible alternate, being the inclusion of restau- rants in the Planned Industrial District (this district being the present zoning district of the subject property). to Gordon that the use of special permits or the inclusionpofed restaurants in a PID would seem to me-policy decisions that . should be addressed by the City Council before any proposed zoning ordinance amendments are prepared for review by the Plan- ning Commission and eventual adoption by the Council. The Senior Citizen Residence District ordinance would seem to be a precedent for the General Mills proposal. In that case, a proposed development was the catalyst for an amendment to the zoning ordinance. The amendment was drafted without specific regard for the proposed senior citizen development, DORSEY. WINDHORST. HANNAFOFi D• WHITNEY R HALLADAY Mr. Warren C. Iiycl Page 2 June 8, 19.77 and it is up to the developer to meet the requirements of the ordinance. In that case, also, it was the Council that first decided that such an ordinance amendment would be desirable as a policy matter for the City. If the City desires to pursue this matter, I recommend that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Council that the zoning ordinance be amended to provide either for the use of special permits or to allow restaurants-in the PID. The Council can then decide that matter as a policy decision. I understand that if such a recommendation is made by the Plan- ning Commission, Gordon Hughes may well have a dissenting staff report. Should the Council decide that either or both of those approaches is appropriate as a policy matter, then the appro- priate ordinances can be drafted and submitted for review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and eventual adoption by the Council. As before, the ordinances should be drafted without any particular development in mind. It will then be -up to General Mills to meet the ordinance requirements. .Very truly yours, TSE /abc Thomas S. Erickson CC: Mr. Robert C. Dunn Mr. Gordon Hughes no ON ;`�� r r \.``_' i / r .t' ,1 I'. 1� ' \�\ � ` \ •� ' � ,,1 I OilWMA IC: *01 Vii" • ` �� '� � ,r- \`t� MEN I ,. .. � :.r •'eh � 1 1 kl'.�p i - � \ y 1r� {• �, i''.�.'. t��?',i °�.' �•' -; .�•. i•+ 1 : ` p - --. - _�T,.�i;, le-:•- I� ,ry1; �.�+� 3F:.: I y• ; rJ� • ;t. •r,,,�.��• -'^. .I; -.'t ,rj?.{�� � .� I � 1 ,• �: ,� • ';::►, t,.!5 i ° °•. + ".� ;,.,.. �� .. III 1 .. .: i �, . � �•-•/", �;. 1 `J • � tr 1- ' �•. I _ �, � � ),aon•�r�Y � l + F .. • I AN A" u--� � I7 - � � � \ , T w � 1 '' _._ a_ I r jjy -�j�j' ._wz --�C1 �•.. _!�•••:�.• 1I fL. � i111QL— C' __��� .....,... � �. l'f . 1 -r •�, M •'"cur;! I S f; • % 535 nttOJ •'1'109 •�, I ` t: iy •1 _. -L .S'. ww>w, •. •=-a •' H•. '�fF .t :NO t :J:.• t :' I Lid. r �_, - )« l'F 1 1. - ;��. >aoa evw3vne i _ `Y•,a Fr _' '�.�'•1 � ;�� ��• li �_ � ,_• .r �;�:,, � 1: : I : �� nwl< �� evil- �J_�L1, 1 �i �•�Ear��i� \!L =-- "�..�.1_�,�r- .�,.7!,.!- �1+ ! y !, T . � . t ' � � � � -- ._... .. . ww. - •fR �� �1.'.1'� cfrc �] 7 .' T r } : A � �'_ �- �7�_ : L: N. ��{ ••�' •'1.:; rir -, :. ;(R C � � 1 F *ti�'�'i� ''F1 •�c-J %' �•��`,j �y .�� :�Ci�tr•� �� 'i-'�1`ArU� ,• "'i P �•��w. �: "{._! ��5•'�J'4i rte•' �/f „\ i� -7 I l�i. '� �• \ \. '.'1�9 /!n' I i �y..:', \•'`- 1• ;` (( � �``'y�,. ._ .1 � x. ��J /Q F�:��, �• r, f.. � �:�•• �, . %�'':. `'; \`'�- ��j.'+* i[�X .11 : �:.......I /�. ;. ;•� i ��� „x�; ' \. _���,a; { `' ? I: : { ` 1, r' 1 . �1 -.�.. A i'' i .. �t.: 1,4'•��,i_ . 1. ' JI``'?� I p0 �•i=•. ,•�� _ F !Y.-�F'� ��-" _ f I :r !.� _ '��:':! ._�J l.'" ��iL��. ..a.aea . �.l:_���- ---`vA t : ..}.�a,. ±`^"``'SL�•f 'E�i" i-� ... ..... ! .. �• �� Y ` l� �.= .� i 1 l`��- i /: € I �`�D a iti r �t .' i t ' ! 3C 1 '•. I ''1. r:.- •.� j1••ir.ra: r f _ _ • I 1 t� -� !' 1! I� L ii.!• y : , .f, �' •����\ a. N\ :` • _ I i _I i ', '� _ �i `'1 • !i - •Q' `.�, � q> �,:,.r '�t1 1, , _ik � t' I, � �, './..; y_.f ,.� -NY%• � �,1 1i '• , G'�ws + `:- ,�-y,� '�''1'„••' T °D.�' .mil i �. F:�xii:.::.c ._: P,� -'r - �`I-1�`- ,•_'•s sl: „ �r-v /rl�- «....... �.�"i: •���...... . _. Fy._ �` ! I� f { 1 j( } .i. •� �� Tr ~„ . ! ~ 1'�::_.... - �j ° '" Itrr .-' ' i - ' •\ c' •' t .n 1 t -i �•J is t'' ;r• -. • t ( 1 !'�•+� }':'�• ... .: (\ �� . *�F j i. i � -�.ti - a>f�a�'•.! II if j'I � { ••s N. I �) .r-. ,s � � •��. i.. '`� \1�1: d j . , _)N.c. j ._ . � : l \ ' I(' (((��� y {� � _ _ __ - _ _ ,.ti .•ate+ - _ ..'=w,..�_ .•._, ....:_� n t _ * •• � II � r, � LI - 1 1:Y = —,1 �. �. 1... ' A" "T,:. ^:i • - :'r �'y 1 -�i_ -. ::: o" .,,,t;'�:•'.rii'- "'�Jy�.,:ra -�- � �1�'sd'•:-''a:. '�f � ' � r.. >+'�" ��1':•. -v� r "ti- .I.,j(., �- . -rl'�! •,i-== �'`'`."'�_ "i` j-.f - '�': % yf!I: 7 1? �i _� ._. �iL • i(- --=1, a...a.� %: T :i * :�1 I.J.' •i. '.I ... ( - ,��••--�� ! �f � .. Y .!' •�M�,.�:ml•'A. '. q_,�,_ il.. .\ �'. \.�,�1 3, ;::.. -.. ■. :.;µ � u ' •t V i'4.�( ,.., •�,;r•.•� � � : •F � �', � __mil '� i ' 1. � �r � '.� �" �..1.' 1 I II . i 1 I: (t y..f`. -` �\ ti i ! l •1', 1\ � y.'' :C:•, � •�� �]Nk-zlk ...�)1�::. _ -- - a ++', � 1ll _�`�' P i '•l:.• .::.Jt:�t.f '__.,, L °' :1 � r't I... N��.11� [ r i �'.ow— ,t '!: ' ._ _• .:�. - 1 ,. 1 `r\ a.. t i t �� Jis -'+'r )•,._ i•�i 1 i ! �� a �� .�4a -if �� - ,� ,« i ..\ .. t - Ttf .1..1 '.-1q O�',.. c't l�� .��,. \;. ::: '•i t ^i T� ► , 11 u t i s I : t i — !' �` J ~ j':l �� :��� ' 1'1 I i 1 ((.��� - �:'�'•f. F t�' _• jj ! ..��.,�� - � -� :I',L -.r. e _ .., rn•,�� � •i - �r O l�_..J:'}t_ �I! '1 t�I��{�� ..I.•�!•i i ?I ::_.. _iFl sic�� °.ii °:��tf I .� `` . I I .. ifi� t'� I• •h: i•, - -'i .. e�..�:2 r,;�.._i � : tl '�11 {I( '-1 = � ` �-l- , c t;: ... �i.a.►.v._, . _ i(: : �1 �•'�� I�: •-- ,ne:��•••. -.1 .:; :•.:: Y;;r ! •Si . � :�-�• _ „� f'• / ;. �! tE. �, : l :1{ ii ! 1 "� - \`::rx:a.ar• :11 . \i' La!- •..+ -I:- -- a..:.. si : +._ } r•ca•;•Y - ` .. '' !�' t :I A. . I : !I I i? i : ; i �.Y�s.�� �,.JI .,\ ..w' ,O, x•57. �� - r r lr �'_!t („ ; }I . +„�.. �i t jrT_ _jam: :R i I c.��1:1 :(Y' r. .l• °.: �j N y, %*1 1 SsJ��.rn:a. -. ./t......�.' ..a'r� I !- �� ^� - r•,,.r) T' �' ?. 1 iti�'w � •�. •]'�� � .J, ! A7, I,� t f' .�I �. �`'���, •'.�i ♦' .. .y � 'L � �i .: "wc1 ,, J IfII >• {1 I i 11 1a�.... i p . 11..,:rt:. °:cs..:•1 —y L"'„� J { I i I �I �I �D Ir ".ti - :r•[ • /;I��.'?� )l_:.- -�i.... I•y l •% " �I {I {tr •uu' r�N .. II" �, i' -� .! 1'I' .r�''°� -R y� /(•. -� - r .. q _ N ),a, _ •� �a ...1 -. 4 .� - _.A:: .44::). 11i :TSJ.: /`•�:' \` I .mac Li .�. �`�:•�.. ', .. .'!< !(7 iu..... ,1 � 'I -y �( � ,%'_-1 : I It ,ti; ! t _t j3', .I � : . ; �I' ^ ;aly•l h 1 ' I:: .�:. :I.::;.....�.: .' 1 , 5�, » , � j) r '\i �1 • } j . d, _1 �1f C� iis , ).. . . • ' o►rw� � F :1�f�� . � t' ) ..�'3�.. :x.. . , ..> :1-4 • ; rs't�'l.r. .-` _ � �. t� _.- "y/ � ' ' 1� .Kr/ ✓ .%�Sa i :�; i7 � J �' -1f ..�:. ( ' j!,��{1: T ` G.�.,i• ��'' • ' ' �._..•...n.,�v �.n u- e1t'' �� . �«' l � ' C \� � I\ '• r���:_..�.. • }j1 • .._- `^ .. u c n '�•' - --- • � .! I! r -. �1Lt11 !•1 j /+ t_-•R-_; it I•'/ .E� ,. �. •�:.;�* nom\ 1K ....1�- _.i ��. :. �_�( ,�... . -�,- ,`,'..rya•• �.r�0•'':.• i... . .I ,^�'! �•' f '.. .... '��.(,�,�yt. �.•'R'f •,4 ,' Jl: i . .�rhr._..x _:.- Caw' '�... [ �(�• J +,_. ' r_ :�./�__ •:• �� �� .�L. !,�„l \�L • ;1�_ .vim 'r = :at�':::•.'.:)�,;�,�`�•11�)rl�. :�I� y,, t '!I !i� ' \�:..•_� �. `r_- -� -el.. '� •� �•� r r���.s,'y- .f ......`'1ri•. llvl..»....�'1t.,'; •���ti^t�tt 8 . • ?l 'i v�: �1( • .• �t KEY Rauenhorst Site \`Undeveloped Potential Restaurant Sites in Bloomington 2-9q Q Undeveloped Potential Restaurant Sites in Edina Office Zones Existing Commercial Restauranrc Existing Employee Lunchrooms with Food Available r. • L� + TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REPORT ON PROPOSED RESTAURANTS AT 76TH STREET AND FRANCE AVENUE Prepared for: Rauenhorst Corporation Northwestern Financial Center 7900 Xerxes Avenue South Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Prepared by: Bather- Ringrose - Wolsfeld, Inc. 7101 York Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 May, 1977 CONTENTS • Page INTRODUCTION...................................................... ............................... I Background ................................................... ... ............................. I Purpose of Study ................ ............................... 0.............:............ I ANALYSIS................................................................ ............................... 2 Existing Situation .......................................... ........................:...... 2 Land Use Considerations ................................. .............................,. 2 Site Planning Considerations .......................... ............................... 4 Long Term Solutions ...................................... ............................... 4 CONCLUSIONS......................................................... ............ .................... 5 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND A comprehensive study, 11494/100 Southdale Corridor Transportation Study ", was completed by Daniel, Mann, Johnson, and Mendenhall (DMJM) in March of 1972. The study recommended that the following three plan elements be "implemented as a unified and total comprehensive approach for the 494/100 Southdale Corridor ": e Land Use - trip generation maximums be established and form the basis for reviewing and controlling future land use development. • Transit - a localized bus transit system which penetrates the residential areas and focuses service on the m activity centers be developed. • Highway - selected highway improvements be made, the first phase of which called for changes to the 1 -494 frontage road system and freeway ramps, extension of York to 1 -494, completion of the ring -road system along 1 -494, and comple- tion of several arterial street intersections. Some of the communities have followed this plan and implemented its recommendations, others have not. This analysis of the property at 76th Street /France will follow the intent of the DMJM Study. PURPOSE OF STUDY Rauenhorst Corporation currently owns a 3 -4 acre site at the northwest corner of France Avenue and 76th Street. The property is currently zoned Planned Industrial; - at this time the most logical use within this zoning classification appears to be an office building. Because of the concern of the traffic impact of an office building on France Avenue, BRW was retained to investigate alternative land uses to an office use. This report presents the existing situation, the consideration of alternative land uses, the site planning considerations, and conclusions. ANALYSIS EXISTING SITUATION A traffic count was taken on France Avenue just north of 76th Street on April 19- 21, 1977. The results are shown on Figure I; the following comments are made: • The volume from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. is relatively constant and averages just over 1,700 vehicles /hour in both directions; the exception to this is from 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. when the volume averages 1,960 vehicles /hour. • The major capacity restraint is the southbound to eastbound movement at 1 -494; delays at this intersection cause the backup on France Avenue. During the p.m. peak hour the backup on France Avenue is for several blocks. LAND USE CONSIDERATIONS Examination of the current traffic volume on France Avenue results in the following observations relative to land use considerations at the property at 76th Street and France Avenue. e - The land use should generate a minimal amount of traffic during the 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. time period. o The heaviest trip generation should be before. 11:00 a.m. or _ of ter 6:00 p.m. o The total generation should be no more than the generation of an office use on the site. If 70,000 gross square feet-of office would vary between 980 trips /day (14 trips /1,000 GFA) with eating facilities to 1,750 trips /day, (25 trips /1,000 GFA) without eating facilities. This assumes general office use with a ' minimal number of visitors; a medical /dental use -would generate a higher number of trips. Using an average generation of 1,315 trips per day, the peak hour would gen- erate approximately 260 trips /hour. After consideration of many land uses, sit down restaurants (non- convenience food orientation) were considered to be the best for the following reasons: o The generation during the breakfast (7:00 - 9:00 a.m.) and dinner hours (6:00 - 9:00 p.m.) complements the current traffic on France Avenue: 2 W G J O c Q J _U 2 W } J cc 7 O FIGURE 1 HOURLY DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC ON FRANCE AVE. JUST NORTH . OF 76TH ST. AIMM • t%ni WYO TAVCAI QV QCW O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O' O O O O ;L N *' N M 4 r r r ;&v j TIME O O O O p O O .0 O O O r r r • Very little if any traffic would be generated during the 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. peak hour time period which is the most critical. 0 The total generation from 2 -3 'restaurants would approximate 1,200 trips /day which is slightly under the daily generation of an office use. • A restaurant use affords the opportunity for potential office and residential users west of the site on 76th Street to access . the site without using France Avenue. SITE PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS To facilitate access to and from the site and to maintain the integrity of France Avenue, the following parameters for site access are recommended: • No curb cuts on France Avenue. s Dedication of sufficient right -of -way to Hennepin County to allow the construction of a right -turn lane on the west side of France, north of 76th Street. e One curb -cut to serve the property that is located as far west on -76th Street as possible (approxima•ely 300 feet from France) . • The joint use of this single access point to serve all the users of the site. _ From a traffic engineering standpoint, this site plan will provide the safest access to the site and possibly improve the functioning of the intersection because of the right -turn lane. LONG -TERM CONSIDERATIONS The DMJM study addresses the transportation and land use situation in the entire I- 494 /Southdole area. As stated, the approach to the land use and access considera- tions for this small 3 -4 acre parcel follows the intent of the DMJM study by relating land use and trip generation characteristics. In addition the larger and long -term aspects of the DMJM study are fully supported. The next step in terms of the longer range viewpoint is probably to implement a localized transit system and construct slip ramps and one -way frontage roads along 1 -494. 4 E CONCLUSIONS Outlined below are the conclusions on the traffic engineering aspects -of the 3 -4 acre parcel at the northwest corner of France and 76th Street. • If an office 'building is constructed (as per the current Planned Industrial zone) approximately 260 additional trips/ hour will be added to the existing 1,960 vehicles /hour on France Avenue during the 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. time period. This will further increase the capacity problem.on France Avenue. , o A restaurant use for site will generate minimal traffic during the 4:00 - 5:00 p.m. time period. e A restaurant use for the site will generate traffic between 7:00 - 9:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m. - 1:30 p.m., and 6:00 - 8:00 p.m.; the morning and evening time periods are when the traffic on France Avenue is the lowest. e To facilitate flow on France Avenue and yet provide access to the site, a single curb -cut located as far west as possible on 76th Street is recommended; no curbcut on France Avenue is recommended. In addition, land should be dedicated to ' Hennepin County to construct a right turn lane on France, just north of 76th Street. 5 RE�is�d1 F'!TIIE?IN COUNTY 1971 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Preliminary Population Allccal:ions tO Minor Clvll DivlSion L 1114 L 1994 1995 = BLOOAIINGTON 81,979 79,119 79 S00 91.900 94,000 BROOOKLYN CENTER 35,171 35,278 34 000 33.500 72.609 BROOKLYN PAR" 26,230 34,971 37,500 49,500 $6,500 CHAMPL'N 4 704 7 749 8,500 17,000 18.000 CHANHASSEN (PT.) 40 36 38.000 _ _ 41.400 43.000 CORCORAN 1.6s6 2,981 ] 200 ] 500 3.600 CRYSTAL 30,92S 29,423 28 S00 26.000 24.000 MOUND 7,S72 8,967 9 S00 9,700 9.500 . DAYTON (PT.) 2,631 3,737 3,900 4,100 4.500 DEEPHAVEN 3.933 3,934 4,000 4,200 4.500 EDEN PRAIRIE 6,938 10,012 15,500 24,300 33.300 ED INA 44 046 48 12S $0,000 50.000 50,000 _ OSSEO 2,908 3,068 - 3,000 2,300_ 2.900 93=LSIOR 2,563 2,971 2.900 2,900 2,900 PLYhSOUTg 19 0f7 2S 59i '9 000 4],000 - 52:500 PORT SNELLING 624 129 400 400 400 ROBBINSDALE 16,845 15,610 11 sn0 13,700 13.900 GOLDEN VALLEY 24 245 24 548 24.000 - 2J.SC0 2J.000 GREENFIELD 977 1 2l2 1 300 1.700 1700 _ GREENWOOD S97 592 600 600 600 _ HANOVER (PT.) 96 131 150 ISO 200 HASSAN TWP. 917 1,618 1.700 1,800 1,800 HOPKINS 1] 428 16,492 16.300 15.600 - I5.500 SPRING PARK' 1,087 1,503 1 600 1.700 1.700 INDEPENDENCE 1,993 2,491 2,700 3,20C 7.400 LONG LAlOi 1 506 1 718 1 800 2.000 2,000 LORE ^IO 340 ]31 ]50 400 350 MAPLE GROVE 6 275 I1 853 19,900 31.500 39.000 MAPLE PLAQ4 L 169 1 712 1 400 1.500 1.500 MEDICINE LUM - 446 450 - 450 400 400 MEDINA 2 ]96 2 fi93 2.900 3,300 3.500 MINNEAPOLIS 434 400 397,421 375.000 385.000 390.000 MINNETONKA 33,776 37,846 38.000 _ _ 41.400 43.000 MIINNETONKA BEACH SB6 598 550 550 550 bENNETRISTA 1,879 3,S80 3.800 4.100 4.5^,0 - MOUND 7,S72 8,967 9 S00 9,700 9.500 . NEW HOPE 23 180 24.236 ?].500 _ - _ __ 21. S00 20.500 ORONO 6,787 7,235 7 400 10.700 11.000 OSSEO 2,908 3,068 - 3,000 2,300_ 2.900 PLYhSOUTg 19 0f7 2S 59i '9 000 4],000 - 52:500 RICHFIELD 47 271 47 95' 42 500 78.300 27,000 ROBBINSDALE 16,845 15,610 11 sn0 13,700 13.900 - -'_ROCKTORD (PT.) 166 24S 300 300 300 ROGER S 544 653 650 700 700 SAINT ANTHONY WT.) 6,886 6 709 6 S00 6.000 _ 6.000 SAINT BONIFACIUS 685 906 900 900 900 SAINT LOUIS PARK 49,903 47-429 46,000 12 300 41.300 _ SHOREWOOD 1 "3 4,471 4.800 6.000 7.200 SPRING PARK' 1,087 1,503 1 600 1.700 1.700 TONKA BAY 1 797 1 455 1-400 1,30m 1.200 WAY7ATA 3 700 ] 964 1 OCO 5.000 5.500 WOODLAND 544 543 100 500 S00 HENNEPIN COUNTY 1, 057 , SCO TOTALS 950 ^R3 a60 392 95] fS0 1,9 .J I00 lvitraccvrva.i4.nav vvva.vaa. �e-�,EQ Preliminary Household Allocations to Minor Civil Division jMl1'1?PlN COU?1TY 1970 1976 1989 1985 6.573 BLOOMINGTON 21,816 24,702 26.500 70,300 11. ? "9 BROONKLYN CENTER 9,150 10.586 11.000 12,400 t2 800 BROOIC.YN PARK 7.341 11.426 13.500 19.700 2. 809 CHAMPLIN 1,291 2,391 2.700 4.000 6,100 CORCORAN 393 865 950 1.050 1.150 CRYSTAL 8.291 B.7S9 8.900 9.000 9 000 699 750 900 1,040 LONG LAKE 454 CAYTON 686 1.048 1.100 1.200 1 400 DEE ?HAVEN 1.762 1.150 1.200 1,500 1,700 EDEN PRARIf 1,653 2.958 5,000 9.000 12 500 794 420 460 490 MEDICINE LAIC° 287 EDINA 13.002 16.667 18,000 20,000 20.400 684 730 850 950 -- - - --- MINNEAPOLIS_ 161,080 EXCELSIOR 69S 1.175 1.150 1,200' 1 200 PORT SNELLING 105 T1 80 80 4 GOLDE211'ALLEY 6.573 7.290 7,600 8.600 8 600 GREENFLELD 271 328 350 370 3 La 0 GREENWOOD 194 208 220 250 2SO HANOVER (PT.) 29 46 50 60 70 HASSAN TNP. 227 J8J 410 470 510 HOPKINS 4.666 6.620 6.900 7,100 7,100 OMEPENDENCE 3l9 699 750 900 1,040 LONG LAKE 454 502 SSO 590 710 LORETTO 82 91 100 t'0 110 MAPLE GROVE 1.503- 3.377 5.500 9 500 12 900 67APLE PLAIN J]7 794 420 460 490 MEDICINE LAIC° 287 172 190 190 190 MEDINA 588 684 730 850 950 -- - - --- MINNEAPOLIS_ 161,080 152,789 164.600 l71 100 175 250 MINNETONKA _ 9.095 10,776 11,900 14 19,100 MINNETONKA BEACH - 158 192 190 200 200 MINNETRISTA_ _- 731 9S5 1.050 1.250 1 4�0 MOUND 2.323 2.84S 3.000 3,300 3,410 NEW HOPE 6,014 7. 175 7,500 7,900 8,4100 ORONO 1.976 _- 2.199 2.400 3,300 1.900 OSSEO 809 905 950 1.000 1.0-10 PLYMOUTH 4,507 7.892 10.000 13.500 19,400 RICHFIELD 14.797 14,947 IS 200 1S tnn 14 7 0 ROBBINSDALE 5,290 5.414 5.600 S-700 5,700 ROCKFORD (PT.)_- 41 BI 90 t00 110 ROGERS 13' '85 2!0 2!0 290 SAIIITANTHONY(FT.) 1,876 1.936 MOO 2 000 2 000 SAINT BONIFACIUS 210 234 250 290 3!0 SAINT LOUIS PARK 15,779 17.172 17,700 14.400 12400 SHOREWOOD 1.112 1,258 1,400 2,000 2,500 SPRING PARK 449 706 7SO 600 800 TONKA BAY 433 461 470 480 480 WAYLISA 1.264 1.482 1 600 2 100 2 700 WOODLAND 159 166 180 190 190 HENNEPIN COUNTY TOTALS_ 309.600 742.296 16].790 4 ^4.700 431 921 Prelimary Employment Allocations to Minor Civil Divisions '•rIEPIV roe ?Irr 1973 99 1995 1990 199 2000 (EST.) BLOOMINGTON 43,95S 52,000 61-000 68.000 75.000 BROCKLYN C-NTER 9,064 9,900 13 M3 l5 aco 16.000 BROOKLYN PARK 2,810 4-100 8,000 13,000 18,0.00 CFLIMPLIN 34S 300 700 1,900 2,000 TONKA BAY 30 30 50 50 SC CORCORAN 3S 50 100 '00 200 10 10 • 10 10 _ CRYST 5 523 5 500 7,000 7,500 8 000 DAYTON (PT.) so 100 100 200 300_ DEEP HAVEN 27S 400 Soo 500 600 EDEN PRAIRIE 3,306 5,100 11.000 14,000 _161000_ EDINA 22 060 28 900 36 000 41,000 43,000 EXCELSIOR 1.200 1,400 1,700 2 000 2 000 FORT SNELLING 14,898 18,000 22,000 23,000 27,000 GOLDEN VALLEY 18 985 22 400 27,000 _ 30,000 32.000 GRREENFIELD S 10 10 50 so GREENWOOD 35 50 50 so 50 HANOVER (PT.) 4 10 10 50 50 HASSAN TWP. 4 10 s0 - 50 50 HOPKINS 16 n9l 16,700 19,000 20,000 21,S00 INDEPENDENCE 30 50 so 100 100 LONG LAKE 1 213 1 300 1,400 - 1,500 1.710 LORETf0 75 100 100 100 100 MAPLE GROVE 759 1,600 4.000 7,000 ic,000 _ MAPLE PLAIN Soo sno 600 700 - 900 MEDICINE LAUKE 36 so so 100 100 MEDINA 384 600 750 1.000 1,250 MINNEAPOLIS 290,324 28S,000 280,000 290,000 285,000 MILINETONKA 5,736 9,060 13.000 20,000 23.000 WNNETONKA BEACH 145 200 200 200 250 MINNETRISTA 10 100 100 ion 200 MOUND 2 725 2,600 3,500 4.000 4.500 NEW HOPE 4,415 5,200 7,000 8,000 9,000 ORONO 550 600 800 1,000 _2 S00 OSSEO 1,738 2,000 2,200 2.500 3,000 PLYMOUTH 6,S87 10,800 15,000 __ 21,000 25.000 RICHFIELD 10 328 9 400 10,S00 1.1,000 12.000 ROBBINSDALE 4,416 4.400 4,700 5,000 6,000 ROCKFORD (PT.) 143 200. 250 300 400 ROGERS 17S 200 200 300 400 SAINT ANTHONY (PT.) 1,999 2.000 2.900 3,S00 SAINT BONIFACIUS 120 200 290 200 200 SAINT LOUIS PARK 30,788 30,600 31.500 32,000 33.000 SHOREWOOD 509 600 1,000 1,500 2.000 SPRING PARK I.500 1.600 2,000 2.300 2.300 TONKA BAY 30 30 50 50 SC WAYZATA 2 'S0 2 500 3 600 4.000 5.000 WOODLAND 4 10 10 • 10 10 _ HENNEPITI COUNTY TOTALS X05 4'4 536,270 S9: SPI) j42,960 694,960 LAT of NORMANDALC PARK • DEVELOPER: RAL/ENHORST Q EXPRE- PROPER ms /NC. tI 9[7./ y� No.' /ill, _ • dvfAAe /M Cotwvrr , jmlAwfsorw . \\ -- I I Q`_J - PROPOSLO IONiMI : ALL lots lvo,,.rTA /AL I 1 3 1 1 G2 i APPROX. AREAS, h ti �% f I i • 7i/ of I to • i / J I GZ ewaf A, FeEr I totwnoN \ \ ?n0. r a. off ^g .... tiff °/ rerw orrrw •awl /t,.I - W65 T I rk � *•Jrw orr ew.aw. / � ... ��.._ ---- ter-'- �� .. , rD y i EST FROM: SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: Subdivision No. c5'' -1.5 ,� tl►'V � j4,&A L ` LAND SIZE: .rDc? r) LAND VALUE: ? . 000 (By: ��� Date: Z7-7] ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. grant an easement over part of the land �� L IIII��J...JJJ B. dedicate % of the land hhGS �Zy 1" C. donate $ ����' as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1'. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition U beneficially expands the park. El 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property it necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. D S. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required In all other instances than above. E 2. Subdivision. Rauennorst t;o Lau-- - {� 5 -77 -13 and L, R. L. S. No. 1129. Generally located at the north- ' W '� Rezoning west quadrant of W. 76th Street and France Avenue. PID I Z -77 -12 Planned Industrial District to C -1 Commercial District. Mr. G. Hughes recalled that this request was considered at the last Planning Commission meeting wherein the proponent requested a rezoning from Planned Indust- rial District to C -1 Commercial District to allow construction of a restaurant on the site. He said the proponent is also requesting a 3 -lot subdivision of the property. He indicated that, as requested by the Planning Commission, staff had consulted the City Attorney regarding the legality of either allowing a Special Use or Conditional Use Permit for restaurant use in the C -1 zone or an amendment to the present ordinance allowing restaurants as a principle use in the PID zone. Mr. G. Hughes referred to the letter from the City Attorney which essentially said that either a special or conditional use amendment to the present ordinance or an amendment to the PID section of the ordinance allowing restaurants as a principle use would be legal options. Following subsequent conversations with the City Attorney, however, he had indicated that a zoning to C -1 with a simple condition that the use be for restaurant purposes only would not be binding and therefore advised against this action. As requested by the Commission, staff had also researched the possibility of allowing restaurants as a use in the PID district. Mr. G. Hughes noted that in the Office Building District section of the zoning ordinance, restaurants and: other accessory uses were allowed in Office Buildings having 40,000 or more square feet or at least 200 full -time employees. Also, accessory uses could not of exceed 10 percent of the gross floor area. He further noted a similar type me use is allowed in Regional Medical District, but it does not require 200 full -time employees, and the accessory uses may cover up to 20 percent of thP gross floor area. He said the primary purpose of these accessory uses is to provide service oriented facilities to individuals employed in the office buildings and employees and visitors of medical buildings. Mr. G. Hughes said staff had reviewed the South Edina Plan which further stated as an objective the requirement or provision of incentives to office, industrial, or large apartment developers to allow the incorporation of restaurants and other uses in developments to capture or intercept possible travel. He said staff therefore feels it would be appropriate to amend the PID section of the ordinance to allow restaurant and other uses as accessory uses, and he referred to a graphic showing the locations of restaurants, lunchrooms, and vending services in southeastern Edina, which were determined through Health Department and zoning records. Mr. G. Hughes said staff would continue to recommend against the C -1 zoning for the following reasons: 1. The request is inconsistent and not in conformance with the South Edina Plan. 2. The requested C -1 zoning provides no assurances that the subject property will, in fact, be used only for restaurant purposes. Allowable C -1 uses such as retail commercial would be undesirable from a land use and traffic standpoint. 3. Adequate sanitary sewer capacity is not available for the proposed land use. 4. The requested rezoning would set a precedent for strip commercial development on vacant land abutting France Avenue on both the east and west sides. Such a use .would not be in conformance with the concepts contained in the South Edina Plan. Mr. G. Hughes said staff would also recogamend that the Planning Commission sgggest to the City Council an ordinance amendment allowing restaurant and other service - related facilities as accessory uses in the PID zone as they are currently allowed in the Office Building District. He said staff strongly urges restaurants not be allowed as a principle use in the PID zone based on the precedence set, and further recommended against the establishment of Special Use or Conditional Use Permits because of past administrative and enforcement problems resulting from such permits. Staff felt this would also start an undesirable precedent. Mr. Peter Jarvis, Bather - Ringrose- Wolsfeld, felt the:Edina Ordinances seemed too inflexible and said a restaurant such as the one proposed would tend to keep employees in the area rather than encourage them to leave and search out other facilities. rMr. Kremer felt there was a need for restaurants in southeastern Edina and that it would not create.a precedent for other areas because of deed restrictions. Following brief discussion, Mr. S. Hughes moved for denial of the rezoning request from PID to C -1 for reasons in the staff report. Mrs. McClelland seconded.'. Upon.roll call, the following voted: Ayes: Lewis, Hughes, Runyan, C. Johnson, McDonald, McClelland.. Nays: G. Johnson, Kremer. Motion carried. Discussion followed regarding the proponent's next step toward rezoning the property to allow restaurant use. The proponent indicated intent to appeal the Planning Commission's decision to the City Council. No further action. V I HOMEOWNERS' PETITION FOR NOISE ATTENUATION DEVICE ive, the.undersigned, hereby petition the Oity of Edina and the L-•;innesota highway vepartment that under no circumstances do we approve of wood or concrete noise barriers on the west. entrance from nighVay 100 to 62 crosstown highway. In order to minimize the effects of traffic for residents where homes face the highiaay. earthen mounds with trees or shrubs would be desirable. �... -J.'1%1 11 • �' .G I Ali -1/ 01 WIZ I , iL 4/V 17k I off' C- CC�Z ��,••c� L /Apt ^e - C a t'r P-& � .- . �L A r r _ ' MEMO TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager Jerry Dalen, Finance Director FROM:. Mark Bernhardson, Administrative Assistant DATE: August 31, 1977 SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF XEROX 7720 MACHINE AND ACCESSORIES Appendices: A. Breakeven Calculations B.. Cost Comparisons /Life. Cycle C. Possible Bid Specifications Within the last few years, Xerox has been selling copying units it previously would only lease to its customers. Rental costs for the Xerox 7720 and its accessories for the City are currently amounting to. between $13,000 - $16,000 annually, exclusive of paper and other supply costs (an average of approxi- mately $.029 per copy). The annual cost for principal, interest and a full service maintenance contract (given a 10% down payment of the net purchase price and a five year period to purchase the machine) would range from $8,200 - $9,500, or about $.016 - .024 for the duration of the finance period and about $.009 for the following two years. The "guaranteed" life span is seven years. A renovation of the machine at that point, costing $2,522 in current dollars, would extend the life for two additional years. In discussions with Tom Lowe, the local governmental representative for Xerox, concerning a possible purchase, he stated that should we award Xerox the bid for the purchase of such a machine prior to the first of October, we would a) receive a remanufactured machine and b) receive up to a 30% ($9,458) rental credit on the purchase price of that machine. Should we wait until after the first of October, we would only receive a rental credit of 20% ($6,418), a. 53,040 difference in the outlay for the machine plus loss of the rental monies paid. If we waited until after the first of January, we would possibly retain our current machine. (There is the possibility that Xerox will run another "special" of the extra 10% rental credit in the near future, but we cannot be assured of when that would occur. We are currently at the maximum amount of rental credits we could receive even under 30 %.) Capital Financing As noted in Appendix A, the full purchase price without credits would be $33,264 and with credits, $23,806. We would be required to make a 10% down payment ($2,380.60) and if we finance the balance over 60 months at an interest rate of 5.5% of the unpaid balance, the full financed price would be $24,554.40, as opposed to an outright payment of $21.,425.40 after down payment ('$3,129 in finance charges). If financed over 24 months, the full financed price would be $22,674, a savings.of $1,870 over the five -year financing price. Maintenance and Other Costs A purchased machine is unconditionally warranted for the first 90 days of use. Should anything go array in that time frame, Xerox will pay for the repairs. After that, we have two options, a) we can either go it alone and call in Xerox at $40 /hour plus repair parts when it needs to be serviced or b) we can purchase a 11fuIV maintenance contract from Xerox at approximately $3,600 per year (it varies with the number of copies) which would run for seven years. With a $2,522 renovation done at the seven year time frame, the maintenance contract could be extended for another two years. (The maintenance contract is required to get the seven year "guarantee ".) The contract covers routine service and repairs although we would be required to perform a minimum of operator maintenance. The price of the maintenance contract is subject to change (increase) on a year. to year basis, but it should not increase more fhan 3 -4% per year. If the maintenance service price for the purchased machines goes up, I rather suspect the price of rental will go up by at least as much. (In calculating the maintenance and rental figures in Appendix B, a 5% annual increase was used.) The price is standard for all governmental agencies and any large increase could jeopardize sales down the line. In addition to the purchase price, there will probably be a $50 instal.lation fee. Damage or destruction of the machine by fire or other causes, would have to be covered under the City's policy (Xerox currently insures for such a loss). Proposed Timetable In order to meet the deadline of October 1st, it would require that the Council approve bid letting at the September 12th meeting (unless an earlier one is held) with publication in the Edina Sun on September 14th and 21st. Bid openings would be on September 28th and the Council would have to approve the bid at a special Council budgetary meeting on the 29th or 30th. (We are required by law to advertise in the paper at least ten days. prior to bid opening.) After conversing with the purchase director in Fridley, I think it doubtful that we would get more than one bid because of the way the specifi- cations could be written. Even if we did receive bids from competitors, it Is doubtful that they could under bid Xerox on a comparable machine, given the 30% credit for rental. Conclusion The only way it seems that we could lose on this proposition is that the 7720 machine would become technologically obsolete in five years and that the rental prices gone down dramatically during that period (I think it is reasonable to assume that a more advanced machine will be desired at the 7 -10 year mark.) Should Edina desire to purchase a different type of Xerox equipment, there is a.trade -in value of 10% of the purchase price of the new machine for the 7720. At this time, 1 am making no proposal as to the purchase of a machine to replace the rental in the Police Department, as we could obtain a "better deal" on a similar model after October 1. 1 will submit a recommendation on that for the first meeting in October. . Mark Bernhardson Administrative Assistant MB /sh COST SUMMARY XEROX 7000 Present Equipment Proposed Equipment (Rental) (To Be Purchased) 35,000 45,000 55,000 Copies per month . 35,000 45,000 55,000 Purchase Price $33,264.00. Less Adjustments 9,458.00. Adjusted Price $23,806.00 . Less Down Payment (10 %) - 2,380.60 Financed Purchase Price $21,425.40 Financed Monthly Payment (60 months) 999.13 .11149.38 1,214.38 Monthly Service 231.76 409.24 289.76 Total 641.00 670.00 699.00 Savings Per Month 358.13 479.38 515.38 Pay Back Period 31 mo. 26.78 25.75 Appendix B ITV COX Cim is 4 11441 September 9, 1977 To: Mayor and Council From: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager Subject: And The Rains.Came (A report on the 200 -year frequency, 7 plus inches rain. from 8:15 p.m. August 30 until 2 a.m. August 31, 1977) The attached reports from Police, Fire, Public.Works and Park Departments concerning the activities of the City during the August 30 downpour will, I think,. be of interest to you. From all available information, there was little permanent damage to City properties, and relatively little permanent structural damage to private properties. It is impossible to estimate with any degree of accuracy the loss suffered by Edina resi- dents in damage to personal property, including furniture, furnaces, home laundry equipment, clothing, wall - panelling and flooring. To meet the request of the County Civil Defense organization, we did file the report from Sgt. Walsh, after reviewing the various department reports. This is to be used as part of an effort to have the County declared a disaster area and eligible for Federal loans and grants. No final determination has been made in this regard as yet. This will probably be the only source of financial help for those who suffered personal property losses. The State Housing loan money is available for persons who do not exceed maximum income limits, and the City can make grants to supplement approved loans from this source as it has been doing in housing rehabilitation. These loans, howver, are limited to repairs required because of structural damage. Bloomington's grants and loans are basically the same as we are offering, and are financed by Community Development Block Grants. We have advised all persons who feel that the City was liable for damages that we were not and that if they feel strongly that we are, they should file a claim. None have yet been received. The living quarters most seriously affected were three lower level apartments at 4000 Hazelton Road. They were completely flooded. The City provided a large pump Wednesday morning to help there. When I visited the premises that afternoon I checked . the flowage of storm water into a catch basin in a City property across the street and found it flowing well. Some residents did say that the intersection of Hazelton and Lynmar had flooded several times this summer and that the City hadn't done anything, even though calls had been made to the City, and Channel 9 carried this on its news. None of the regular employees in the Engineering Department, who would have been the most likely recipients of such calls, remember being contacted. I know of only one instance of severe dissatisfaction on the part of a resident. Details are contained in Craig Larsen's memo attached. I talked with this lady at Mayor and Council Page 2 September 9, 1977 least four times and Bob Bahneman made a special after -hours inspection there. The Building Inspection Department has made many inspections to check possible damage upon request. Generally, the storm sewer system functioned as it was designed to do. A special check was made of one installed at 41st and Lynn and it was working properly. The basic design criteria used in the various parts of the City's storm sewer system is a 100 -year frequency rain, with 25 to 50 year capacity in the pipes and the balance in the various ponds or retention areas. Because of apparent previous unauthorized tampering with control structures in Lake Cornelia, the portion south of 66th street did not flow out as rapidly as it might have. The tampering involved an effort to keep the lake level higher than usual. This caused flooding of the street and required a considerable amount of pumping from the lake. The drainage of the swimming pool was delayed a few days because of the lake elevation. Underground garages in several apartment buildings were severely affected. Once again, I think Edina's employees who were involved during the downpour showed initiative, skill and devotion to duty far beyond that which is normally expected. WCH /md attachments To: Vincent Bongaarts, Lieutenant From: Stephen Marston, Back -up Dispatcher Re: The Big Storm of 30 -31 August 1977 The following is an account of the participation events of the night of August 30 -31, 1977. Where are taken directly from tapes of telephone calls ten documents, such as ICR's. Where this official ory and personal observations will be introduced. 31 August 1977 of the Edina Police Department in the possible, times and events described . and radio transmissions and from writ - documentation was not available, mem- On the evening of 30 August, the 3 -11 shift had the following men on -duty: One Lieuten- ant, one Sergeant, four patrolmen, one patrolman (6 -2) and one Back -up Dispatcher. One patrolman and one dispatcher had called in sick. Prior to 2015 hous, when the rain began, there.had been a heavy amount of activity which .totalled twenty -five ICR's, including an explosion /fire, two burglaries, three thefts, 'an indecent exposure, a warrant arrest, a rubbish fire and a medical emergency (broken neck). Up until that time, only one officer had had an opportunity to take his dinner break. The rainfall itself began at apprrox matt 'Ql iourrs. According to officers, it came own in s ee s rom e ver eglnning. As is often the case during poor weather, many alarms began coming in; six being reported by 2105 hours. In each case at least two officers were able to respond. All of them proved to be false alarms. At 2015 hours, the Back -up Dispatcher (,rho was scheduled to go home at 2100 was authorized to remain until 2300 due to deteriorating weather conditions. During this time, no severe weather warnings were announced for Hennepin County; at least, none came over the CRT.. By 2040 hours, the first streets began to flood in the Arden & I -lest 50th Area. Squads on the scene reported that the storm drains were not blocked- there was just too much water to be carried away by the sewer system. At 2105 hours, France Avenue began to flood between Hazelton and Gallagher. Adam Batko from Public Works was contacted about getting some men out to clear the drains. It was determined that France Avenue was ..a Hennepin County responsibility. Since Edina streets were still relatively clear, Batko was told to secure and Hennepin County Shop was notified. About this time, a series of traffic accidents were reported, three in number, requir- ing a squad to be tied up for a period of time. At 2133 it was determined that France Avenge would have to be blocked off between blest n an es t srnce 'water was reported o l3e—f e— t—Ueep iotori st could not get through. Henne_p_i_n_ County Shop was notified of this need at 2141 hours..The dispatcher was told tVat t e re we e oniy ree men on the n na wou ciav'e of communication. At this time the Lieutenant and one patrolman were diverted to the Public Works garage to obtain the necessary equipment. In spite of this loss of manpower, the remaining patrol units were able to handle normal service calls without any delay or back -log. Lt. Bongaarts, Officer Barington and one Public Works employee were able to obtain the barricades and other equipment, such as hip - boots, that the individual squad cars did not have. The Fire Department also contributed several pairs of.boots. r� Page Two. At 2206 Hours, Lt. Bongaarts directed two squads to begin the transfer of squad cars from the Public Works garage to the rear of 4801 in order that the oncoming officers would have vehicles. During this time, several officers experienced windshield- fogging in their squads. The only way to remedy this was to run the air - conditioning units at full - blast. Since the officers were already soaked to the skin, they experienced much discomfort due to the cold. HL ze—p nour � eievision wa notified that Franc ven clo � uwweRas sed between tes-t 72nd and West 6th. 7 They were requested to broadcast the information. By this time flooding was also being reported at several key intersection including 100 & West 70th, Benton & 100 and West 66th & Xerxes. Individual squads on patrol moved whatever cars that they could and transfered motorist to dry ground. In many cases, however, the partially- submerged cars served as makeshift roadblocks, diverting traffic to more passable routes. Due to this flooding�it was determined that City Public Works People should be called a£em�en up tie s" "ewers. am Batas aga n noiecY atl hours. Due to the fact that"°hf�epa'%Tier wa° a� one on a de"s% an w as getting'�'�°° nundated with phone calls, Mr. Batko was asked to contact his men himself. From about 2145 hours on, it should be pointed out that all six incoming phone lines were constantly in use, making it difficult for the dispatcher to make the numerous phone calls being requested. These were completed, but only after a certain degree of delay and with much difficulty. The calls were mainly people reporting water levels that were rising to alarming heights in their yards and on the streets. There were also literally hundreds of calls requesting road information and people wishing to notify the police that their vehicles were swamped and to please, not give them a ticket. There were also dozens of calls reporting street light outages. It was also about this time that squad 3416 became swamped. While enroutte, toga call, t g,ad,an into deep water at 58th & Ashcroft. A tow was reques�te imrediat�y, but all lines at Soutli'"e"hexaco were usy. 'f-er° a time, a squad was able to stop by at Texaco and the request was made via radio. By that time, however, the water had risen over the level of the hood. A few moments later, squad 3411 also became swamped as it responded tom call in the area of Meadow Ridge an diRid ,geview. e ��a' er rode to a evel equa io fli'e"'ai'"�"Eow was a so ordered, v� a thel poTi ce radio to the squad at the service station. When it became apparent that squad cars were also getting stuck, Sgt. Butler ordered all remaining squads to withdraw to positions on high ground or to return to the station since it was not known whether the dog shift officers would be able to make it to work. As it turned out, all the dog shift officers did make it in. One early arrival provided valuable assistance by helping to handle the incoming phone calls. a rule vise o llnhts whic in �nr n�mi �i Some did no units were eemer ency of s; ;.. might become 7 �dlildye. i0S dispatched to complaints relating to water. The citizens were si}ua ion an ha assistance.to remove water7rominCi`v1dual a. t,inere possibre; t s,arrn�ed and ere Iv Seerile o ac F- pf fFi §_ 1s — n ge'fi �!°i tuati on. Page Three An exception was a call received from Cicero's restaurant in the Leisure Lane Mall. It was reported that water was accumulating on the roof and noises indicated that there was the possibility of a cave -in. Fire Department was notified and requested to dispatch a unit to assist in the removal of the water. At 2300, it was ordered that the Police Min i n i ua rest enders Frf e, wpresuiiia ciimaLic conditions. HDOUc a oo explained the alarm companies. e , to the shorta i Lys o.T_ LrLejg4arm„S..Re n triCagerea Dy arms were received. The situation was 0 At 2300 hours, the dog shift went on duty. James Dybdahl .took over the dispatch function. The 3 -11 shift was held over pending further developments. Up until this time, the material in the preceeding narrative has been drawn from taped radio transmissions and telephone conversations as well as written documents. With the arrival of additional personnel, the position of this writer as the sole dispatcher ceased. Therefore, much of the narrative for the time period subsequent to 2300 can only be drawn from personal reco lIection. As the new officers became available, various city vehicles were,prre_ss�ed i n o ®se v' ce 2jet the maximum number of men on the -' stroe't" ti-el mmalx'`tontrol Van the fire as �r�el l ass"se'r era�'P i� 'ic"RIJOrks "treks and a1' avaMb— e��"°�" squad cars weere"`"u' e . .Cheif Swanson came on the air at 2311 hours, authorizing the call -back of off -duty staff officers if additional manpower was needed. Reserve Officer Kane also came in. Sh rt after 2315 hours, there came an inc eassiinq number of residents complaining of actual fiooding"o eir asernen s. ke- names tirere a en, as we as the a resses, o Tep assed on o `u'bTi forks as soon a°s ie s =U. L ��on,q ete io e ''Dint Mere i n i v1 ua's 'e -e-Er 'an �rme'd71 'n coy I d ie taken ca e From these calls, t` e areas rr-dzs s66'6e-i -t e '1`�t'he eas si e of 100 that lies south of West 54th Street, the area bordered by 100 - Crosstown -West 66th - P.N. &S Railroad, and various sections of the low -lying area along County Road 18. In an effort to relieve stranded motorists Len Dvorak from the Edin, gj nras coffin a�Rc°ted forthe$foan"�ola scfioolbusici �roulhav"een gh freeboard toet through teep�,e�to�7G�ipliose strandede arranged to have d 6usdriverl arold Habighorst of 5801 Brookvieo-r. Ptr. Habighorst was picked up at home by a squad and, thereafter, he and Reserve Officer Kane patrolled the city picking up motorists. Due to the volume of telephone traffic, several additional men were detailed to assist Dispatcher Dybdahl. Primarily, other dispatchers and supervisory personnel attempted to handle all the phones, thus enabling Dybdahl to concentrate on the radio dispatching. During the course of the shift, the following incidents required an officer to be dispatched: 1. At 2300 hours, a*report of a fire at 4733 School Road was received. One squad plus Officer Snyder, who resonded on foot as his squad was swamped nearby, were sent to the scene along with the Fire Department. The fire turned out to be unfounded; steam was rising from the roof. 2. At 2349 a squad was dispatched to Tracy Avenue and the Crosstown to check on a motorist who reported, via CB radio, that he had a history of heart trouble and that the strain of the current conditions might lead to trouble. Rescue was also ordered, but no immediate medical problem was determined. Page Four 3. At 2352 a call was received stating that several children were trapped inside a partially- submerged automobile on Valley View near West 68th St. Squads were dispatched, but the children checked out O.K.. 4. At 0000 hours and 0009 hours, fire alarms were received at 5400 West 70th and the Arneson Property on West 70th. Fire Units and squads were dispatched, but no fire was found. 5. At 0045 hours there was a report of a medical emergency at 4371 Thielen, in this case a very bad bloody nose. Rescue and squads were dispatched and the party was trans- ported to Southdale- Fairview Hospital. 6. At 2316 a hysterical woman reported flooding and a gas sdispatched. lat 40OTherreport on squads were available, although fire department units this incident indicates that the residents were assisted and advised. 7. At 0055 hours a report was received of bprowler in a found under construction at 7309 Gleason Road. Squads were ut no 8. At 0138 hours, OfficerSchwartz observed a female acting in a confused and disoriented manner on the Crosstown at France Avenue. She was transported to the station and released to her relatives. '9. At 0139 hours 'and 0209 hours alarms were received at Amerinjeco and Goodman Jewelers, both of which are located within Southdale Center. Squads and Southdale Security were dispatched and notified. Although it initially appeared that a burglary had taken place at Goodmans Jewelers, this was later shown to be unfounded. As the evening wore on and more squads became available, units were also dispatched to various flooded apartments where gas leaks may have been a problem. �e_dfthe shift, Northern States Power eras contacted o s sit- re- onsan¢,av enripe�voe �rflen ee'Y` , �.=t .� a lift station „ortral`n�ut Dri' vRY,��A?nahP��Jorc�s�"emploenes About 0100 hours, the Department was contacted by a representative of the American Red Cross offering shelter to any resident displaced by the flooding. At the time, there was no report of any resident having been displaced, but the information and phone number was retained as a resource available in the event the need should present itself. At 0300 hours, the 3 -11 shift was secured. By that time, the bulk of the city streets were again passable to traffic, the rain having slowed by 0100 hours and stopped en- tiely by 0200. Normal patrol proceedures were introduced .as the emergency had apparently .passed. . Page Five The preceeding is a summary of the events which occurred on the night of August 30 and 31, 1977. The facts presented are largely supported by departmental documents and are accurate to the best recollection of this writer. Attached is.a list of Police Department Personnel that were on -duty on the evening in question. If you have any questions or additions that you wish to make, please feel free to contact me when convenient. Submitted 31 August 1977. ,5 a /Ass Lip' Stephen Marston, Back -up Dispatcher Police Department Personnel On -Duty Plight of 30 -31 August 3 -11 Shift: 3409- Lieutenant Vincent Bongaarts 3410- Sergeant George Butler 3411- Officer Sylvester Schwartz 3412- Officer William Barington (6:00 - 2:00) 3414- Officer David Bush 3415- Officer John Shepard 3416- Officer Michael Snyder Stephen Marston Kay Torbenson Dog Shift: 3410- Sergeant Raymond Weegman 3411- Officer Thomas O'Connor 3414- Officer Robert Buie 3416- Officer Thomas Johnson James Dybdahl Additional Personnel Recalled: 3402- Chief Craig Swanson Officer Michael Sorem (set up a C.B. monitoring system at City Hall) CITY -OF EDINA STORM DAMAGE, TUESDAY, AUGUST 30TH, 1977. Content and Structural Damage Partial Heavy HOMES - 182 20 - $ 40,000 12 - $180,000 $300 Average- 150 - 45,000 BUSINESS - 0 - 0 - - 0 - APARTMENTS - 15 -:12 -.,$ 36,000 3 - $ 50,000 TOTAL 182 - $121,000 15 - $2300000 GRAND TOTAL - $351,000 Respectfully, C..� /� J Sgt. William (d. Walsh Community Information and Service Officer Edina Police Department MEMORANDUM TO: Warren C.. Hyde, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, Housing Assistance Planner DATE: September 7, 1977 RE: Ms. Bledsoe, 5801 Concord Avenue South Initial contact was made with Ms. Bledsoe on Friday, September 2 while she was in Fairview - Southdale Hospital. 'At that time, I explained to her that the only assistance available to her, at her income level, would be a Minnesota Housing Finance Agency Loan through The First Edina National Bank. During the same telephone conversation, I informed Ms. Bledsoe of the loan limit ($10,000) and the contact persons at the bank. Ms. Bledsoe, however, did not seem interested in a loan. I explained to her that I knew of no disaster relief rg ants being made available at this time. At the request of the City Manager, I went to see Mrs. Bledsoe's home on September 6th at approximately 5:00 P.M. The basernent area, as well as a portion of the first floor, had been damaged by water and sewer back -up. The house appears to be structurally sound, with most damage to furnishings, finished surfaces and appliances. Because of the sewer back -up, there is also a major problem with odor. At this meeting I again explained the programs that the City administers. Ms. Bledsoe was, however, still only interested in a grant for the damages which she claims will total $26,000. I suggested that she contact the Governor's office as well as her Congressman.to see if any State or Federal grants were being made available to flood victims. Ms. Bledsoe indicated she would pursue these other channels of possible assitance. CL:k MEMORANDUM September 7, 1977 To: Ken Rosland From: Warren C. Hyde Subject: Storm Damage to Park Property In order that I can give the Council a complete report on the effects of the rainstorm of last week, please let me know as soon as possible any damage to park properties and of any particular problems created because of the rain. If the county is declared a disaster area, it is possible that we might be able to be reimbursed for repairs to public property. Were any park employees called out during the storm or immediately afterwards, outside of normal working hour ? If so,.what did they do? WCH /md U)oL 6f?r emaY So (}bal I Cleo. lV O I oeV� CYPiW,S IC-J' GM +e r1P. h 40i on own ih cre2K Ha�i��% Somme, n vo'seM�A+ � , � vJ- 'rno�p� A MEMORANDUM TO: Warren C. Hyde, City Manager FROM: -Robert J. Buresh, Director of Public Safety SUBJECT: 200 -Year Storm - August 30th DATE: September 1, 1977 The Fire Department answered 26 calls on August 30th of which 17 were related - directly to the storm. Two of these.were medicals and 15 were gas or electrical -problems caused by the flooding. Our first storm- related call came in at 2029 hours and we cleared from our last storm- related call at 0703 hours the morning after. Nearly all of our equipment was in use at some time or another during the storm, many times being manned .by only one or.two men.. The fact that each Assistant Chief had his own car and portable radio paid off great rewards. Many times, a call such. as a smoke check or smoking wiring was handled by one man in one car. The Assistant Chiefs were also able to stay mobile =and look for access routes into the various locations we had to travel as many of our main arteries were completely impassable, such as the Crosstown Highway and France Avenue. Due to the number of cars that had to be pushed out of the way, we are considering the possibility of installing push.bumpers on all of our Chiefs' cars.. The feeling is that there is justification for the push bumpers based on our normal number . of motorists' assists performed throughout the year, but the storm really brought it to our attention. Our equipment performed well, but much of the credit for this goes to the people operating it who exercised good common sense and judgment. The Police Department borrowed our 4 -wheel drive pickup truck and some.of our turnout clothing in order that they could stay in service. I was quite proud of both the Police and Fire Departments for their cooperative efforts and the very resourceful and independent thinking on the part of each individual who was confronted with the unusual problems created by the storm. As during previous severe storms, the cooperation that we received from the gas and electric compani.es left a lot to be desired. NSP was so far behind in calls that only next -day service was available. Being in the emergency business, I can cer- tainly appreciate their position in .these situations because it is rather difficult to staff and equip a department to handle the very infrequent situations. The "doomsday approach" is just not cost - effective. .14e face a very similar and real problem providing services to our citizens, particularly with an area -wide storm such as this, because our mutual -aid system becomes nearly totally ineffective due to the calls for service that each department has within their own community. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager - 2 - September 1, 1977 We didn't really learn anything from the storm that we didn't already know or experience before other than a few new.areas within the,City that should be flagged because of their poor drainage. As with other storms, our greatest- problem seems to be with shutting down the utilities. Gas pipes and appliances end up under water and the settling dirt and erosion always presents the possibility -of gas line leaks. Alarm systems frequently fail during storms such as this due to water getting into the electrical system and shorting them out.. The-fact that they are fail -safe and trigger an alarm with an electrical failure causes us to be answering a lot of false alarms where no fire or threat of fire exists. Electrical failures are one of our most dangerous problems to contend with. For some reason, many systems do not kick off on the breakers and light bulbs continue to burn under water. Wiring heats up to the point of melting and burning insulation, and we cannot get help from Northern States Power to shut these systems down. So far, we have gotten by even with the systems where oil bath transformers and thousands of volts are involved. But, with so many of the decisions made in the emergency aspect of our work, I am always questioning the degree of calculated risk we should be taking. One of our biggest problems during a storm such as this is with public awareness regarding our limitations to provide basement pumping service. Most people seem to think that the fire department can drive up to their house and quickly remove the water from the basement. There is no way we can get our pumpers in place to accom- plish what they want as this is a job for smaller portable pumps. We presently have one such pump and use it for this purpose but could not begin to handle the calls in a storm situation such as this. Critical water removal situations are passed on to the Public Works Department. ROBERT J. BURESH DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY Septenv er 6 1977 About 3:30 P;I, August 30,. 1977, I received my first call fron the .Police Dis;atch regarding moderate flooding, mainly backyards. I dispatched 2 men from the Sanitary Sewer Department, and 2-men from the Street Departr:.ent. Around one hoar later I received another call from the. Police Dispatch requesting more help. By morning we had about 10 nen working plus the night mechanic who was taking telephone calls. I worked with the night mechanic the rest of the night by phone and radio. Approximately 100 calls were taken until morning. During the early morning hours and the rest of the day we had received about 300 calls, some of them repetitious. We had, roughly, 35 to 40 basement calls. Only about 12 or less had water up to the ceiling. One call, York'and 64th was possibly our worst - Pumps could not keep up and later flooded. 7400 Oaklawn turn around we pumped out 8 basements. At 4000 Hazelton about 5' of water in basement apartments required 24 man hours. 5800 Ashcroft we did 5 basements, one was full the others about 4'. At first we set a priority, water over 2' we attempted to pump. The following day we followed up our current and previous calls and did all we could to help the residents. Roughly we had four bigbies, Oaklawn, York, Hazelton and Cornelia. We pumped about 30 basements and in some instances we washed and cleaned the basements. We washed out and flooded on the railroad track from Hansen Road to Valley Lane, again, 2 houses were flooded there. The only structure failure was the railroad right of ways. Rock ballast was hauled in, we have men working there now. About 4' of Rock has covered our drains. A. D. Batko, Sup't. Public works Dept. City of Edina, MN. MEMO 12 September 1977 TO: The Honorable Mayor of Edina -James VanValkenburg The Honorable City Council City Manager - Warren Hyde FROM: Kenneth Rosland- Director of the Park and Recreation Department RE: 1977 -78 SHADE TREE REPLANTING Y ROGRAM Because Dutch Elm Disease and Oak Wilt have killed so many trees in the City, it's time to begin a stepped -up replacement program to compensate our boulevard and parkland losses. It is our hope to replace 600 trees by 31 December 1978, when the present State of Minnesota Shade Tree Program expires. We plan to plant 200 trees in fall 1977, spring, and fall 1978, if the Council approves. The Park and Recreation Department has applied for three CETA Forestry Aides which may do the actual replanting and nursery maintainence. These Aides could significantly reduce labor costs and leave the bulk of our funds for the purchase of nursery stock. Discussions with CETA adminis- trators have been encouaging with regard to acquiring these Aides If the CETA Forestry Aides are approved, we will be able, at your discre- tion, to,provide\1 replacement trees without charging Edina homeowners. If the positions are not approved, we hope to maintain the proposed pro- gram at a cost of roughly $25 per tree to be paid by the homeowner. This fee would cover replanting costs. Last year the City made replacement trees available to residents at a cost of $40 per tree to cover replanting. The trees themselves were provided at no cost from City nurseries. Unfortunately, only 30% of our residents who lost boulevard trees applied for this program. We therefore feel that.to do a good job of reforesting City boulevards a program entailing no cost to our residents is desirable. Funds for the proposed program could be generated as follows: A. $5000 City Budget for Replanting in 1977 B. $5000 City Budget for Repalnting in 1978 (request) C. $4780 HUD Year 2 Community Development Funds D. $4694 State of Minnesota 48% Matching Funds for Replanting in 1977 E. $1000 HUD Year 3 Community Development Funds* F. $2880 State of Minnesota Marching Funds for Replanting in 1978 (assuming the State re- approves 48% match for 1978) G. 23354 TOTAL FUNDS FOR 1977 =78 PROPOSED REPLANTING PROGRAM H. -$4780 Used for Spring 1977 Nursery Stock I. T1874 TOTAL UNUSED FUNDS FOR 1977 -78 REPLANTING PROGRAM OVER PLEASE... * This is a minimum figure. If the Council directs, additional CD Year 3 money can be transferred to Replanting to meet unexpected costs without increasing demand on the City Budget. With these funds, the City could plant 600 2 -inch trees on City boulevards at no cost to our residents. A "New Tree Owners'" manual could be printed explaining the care of the young trees. The residents would have primary responsibility for the trees well -being until maturity. Perhaps a tag with this information could be attached directly to the tree. The CETA Forestry Aides along with the Edina Forester would monitor the progress of the replanted trees providing residents with advice and help with problems. New trees planted in parks would be maintained by the Forestry Aides. We.feel strongly that Edina needs a strong replanting program for its boulevards and parklands. We are specially enthused that we can begin a good program without increasing Edina's replanting budget. Thank you. Kenneth Roslan Director of the Park and Recreation Department RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN FOR PROVISION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES IN THE CITY OF EDINA AND THE SUBMISSION OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ACT SUBSIDY.. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina and functions as the official Board of Health of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to promote, support, and maintain the health of the entire community at the highest level; and WHEREAS, the Community Health Services Act provides for subsidies in support of public health services on the local level throughout the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, a special needs study has been made and a special public meeting held relative to the needs and priorities of the community for Community Health Services; and WHEREAS, the Advisory Board of Health of the City of Edina has reviewed the plan for the provision of public health services in the City of Edina and recommends its approval to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed this selfsame plan and finds it consistent with the needs and priorities of the community as determined by the Advisory Board of Health and as expressed by the citizens of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the Community Health Services Plan for the City of Edina is approved and authorization is hereby given to submit an application for the Community Health Services Act subsidy. Passed and adopted this day of 1977. Attest: it _ . City Clerk b -1 Mayor EDINA ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING: September 6, 1977 Edina City Hall Conference Room A G E N D A Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Chairman presiding • I. Roll Call II. Minutes III. Announcements and Reports A. Community Health Services Hearing - June Schmidt, Bev Harris B. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Linda Bjerke C. House File #1 Forum, Minneapolis - Dave Velde D. Message from Mayor, Attendance Ordinance - Ken Esse IV. Adoption of Resolution for Final Draft of CHS Proposal V. Agreement Allowing City Licensing of Hotel /Motels VI. Request for Hearing on House File 1 /Senate File 459 in Edina Area VII. Adjournment BY -LAWS EDINA ADVISORY HEALTH COMMITTEE ARTICLE I Name The name of this City Commission is the Edina Advisory Health Committee. Duties The duties of this Committee are: .A. To research, study, and evaluate the needs concerning the health and environment of the City of Edina. B. To advise the City Council (Board of Health) of its findings relating to the needs of the health and environment of the residents of the City of Edina. Officers A. The Committee shall elect officers including a Chairman and a Vice Chairman with terms of one year. B. The election of Chairman and Vice Chairman shall take place in January of each year. C. If the office of-Chairman is vacated by resignation, the Vice Chair- man shall become Chairman and .a new Vice Chairman shall be elected by a majority vote of the members of the Committee. ARTICLE IV Membership A. The Committee shall consist. of (9) to (12) voting members. B. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by the Mayor, with approval of the City Council (Board of Health). The Committee may submit to the City Page 2 Council (Board of Health) names for appointment to the Committee. Members of the-Committee must be residents of the City of Edina. C. First appointment may be for less than two years; thereafter, all terms shall be two years and no member shall serve more than three consequ- tive terms. D. The membership of the Advisory Committee shall be as follows: at least one third providers of health services, including at least threc licensed professionals; and at least one third consumers selected to represent con- sumers organizations or constituencies within the community. E. Edina Health Department personnel, and a designated member of the City Council (Board of Health) shall be ex- officio, nonvoting members of the Committee. The Chairman may appoint additional ex- officio, nonvoting members. ARTICLE V Organization A. The Committee shall meet at least six times a year and at the call of the Chairman or a majority of the members. B. Members shall be notified of the place and time of each meeting. All meetings shall be open to the public. C. Greater than 50 percent of the voting members will constitute a quorum. D. The organizational meeting shall be held at the first meeting in January each year. E. The Chairman may appoint committees, including special committees and ad hoc committees. Passed and adopted this -2--day of , 1977. C/ Chairman EDINA ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING: September 6, 1977 Edina City Hall Conference Room A G E N D A Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Chairman presiding • I. Roll Call II. Minutes III. Announcements and Reports A. Community Health Services Hearing - June Schmidt, Bev Harris B. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Linda Bjerke C. House File #1 Forum, Minneapolis - Dave Velde D. Message from Mayor, Attendance Ordinance - Ken.Esse IV. Adoption of Resolution for Final Draft of CHS Proposal V. Agreement Allowing City Licensing of Hotel /Motels VI. Request for Hearing on House File 1 /Senate File 459 in Edina Area VII. Adjournment LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET CITY OF EDINA As at July 31, 1977 CURRENT ASSETS: Cash: Demand deposits Working Fund Accounts Receivable Loan to Other Funds Inventory: Liquor Wine Beer and Mix 'Prepaid Expenses: Unexpired Insurance Supplies Inventory FIXED ASSETS AT COST: Land Lamd Improvements Buildings Furniture and Fixtures Leasehold Improvements Less: Allowance for Depreciation and Amortization Contruction Progress CURRENT LIABILITIES: Trade Accounts Payable Accrued Payroll Due To Other Funds SURPLUS: Invested in Fixed Assets .Unappropriated ASSETS i ,I $483,915.84 3,500.00 $ 487,416.84 100.00 415,000.00 $303,318.82 210,581.47 26,220.70 540,120.99 $ 2,938.66 400.00 3,338.66 $1,445,976.49 LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 108,376.93 4,839.02 $ 113,215.95 3,188.50 $ 657,550.88 1,329,572.04 1,987,122.92 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,1031527'.374 $152,518.85 $ 21,474.17 481,643.80 149,325.01 3,035.55 $655,478.53 232,862.46 422,616.07 $575,134.92 82,415.96 657,550.88 TOTAL ASSETS $2,103,527.37 LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $ 108,376.93 4,839.02 $ 113,215.95 3,188.50 $ 657,550.88 1,329,572.04 1,987,122.92 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,1031527'.374 I -e and B.- le refunds N_T SALES LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INI:OME AND EXPENSE CITY OF EDINA $338,416.30 $963,987.48 $825,521.41 $2,127,925.19 $463,450.77 $947,375.93 $745,660.73 $2,156,487.43 $125,034.47* $16,611.55 $79,860.68 $28,562.24* OF SAL",: - Jcnucryll09,208.09 218,953,44 294,377.10 819,782.36 $403,585.19 $1,038,735.80 e'`r'fuly31 115,047.99 224,307.78 $288,537.20 $814P428.02 GROSS PRO:$ 49,879.10 $149,559.46 .- - -A ,'NG EXF:NSES 9,923.92 $ -.., $ SEVEN fW NTHS ENDING JULY 31, 1977 AND JULY 31, 19.6 7,516.25 -- - .' = �•° 23 154.85 {NCREASf- DECREASE° 55,578.74 E7FcN5: 1977 Total 50th St. 1976 Yorl-djlc - . Ornndvi.ew Total_ '.50th St. - Yorkdale Grandview Total �•s. rk -ial.� Grandview 27.90 on inrea 518.75 -0- 902.69 $. 5 493.66 :;ET MCC. - - 205.98* 4.77% $213,962.13 $557,832.35 $502,592.45 $1,274,386.93 $287,367.47 $559,139.00 $463,199.84 $1,309,706.31 $ 73,405.34* 2,202.29* $ 1,306.65*$39,392.61 $35,319.3&.* 63,099.75 222,112.26 183,849.86 469,061.87 77,725.56 190,311.23 136,340.73 404,377.52 14,625.81* 1,823.98 $.1,282.90 31,801.03 47,509.13 64,684.35 66,202.47 198,530.98 155,287.94 420,021.39 98,740.23 195,687.38 144,634.65 439,062.26 32,537.76* 2,843.60 10,653.29 19,040.87* 6,002.11 19 563.40 15 781.66 41 347.17 8,776.80 19 248.55 15 255.91 43 281.26 2,774.69* 314.85 525.75 1,934.09* 49,266.46 $998,038.99 $857,511.91 $2,204,817.36 $472,610.06 $964,386.16 $759,431.13 $2,196,427.35 $123,343.60* $33,652.83 $98,080.78 $ 8,390.01 10.850.16 34.051.51 31.990.50 76,892.17 9,159_.29 17,010.23 13,770.40 39,939.92 1,690.87 17,041.28 18,220.10 36,952.25 $338,416.30 $963,987.48 $825,521.41 $2,127,925.19 $463,450.77 $947,375.93 $745,660.73 $2,156,487.43 $125,034.47* $16,611.55 $79,860.68 $28,562.24* OF SAL",: - Jcnucryll09,208.09 218,953,44 294,377.10 819,782.36 $403,585.19 $1,038,735.80 e'`r'fuly31 115,047.99 224,307.78 $288,537.20 $814P428.02 GROSS PRO:$ 49,879.10 $149,559.46 .- - -A ,'NG EXF:NSES 9,923.92 $ -.., $ 24,907.64 :..._:� 7,516.25 -- - .' = �•° 23 154.85 TOTAL CFE ATI 55,578.74 E7FcN5: 61.93* 5 699.64* 29.03 1.02* 85.78* 21.49* 108.29* 4,044.32 23.85 84.55 over er under 27.90 on inrea 518.75 -0- 902.69 $. 5 493.66 :;ET MCC. - - 205.98* 195,512.91 712,310.86 $907,823.77 200,765.22 $707,058.55 $118,462.86 523,674.44 1,826,470.32 $2,350,144.76 540,120.99 $1,810,023.77 $ 317,901.42 $ 38,796.78 $ 35,101.60 $ 98,806.02 19,475.70 14,977.76 41,969.71 28,349.54 24,201.73 75,706.12 $ 86,622.02 $ 74,281.09 $ 216,481.85 $ 62,937.44 $ 44,181.77 $ 101,419.57 172,534.05 383,609.65 $556,143.70 158,499.74 $397,643.96 $ 65,806.81 214,596.83 793L898.77 4.008,495.60 217,632.20 $790,863.40 $156,512.53 219,022.28 606,153.16 624,199.78 1,801,708.20 $843,222,06 $2,407,861.36 207,404.71 583,536.65 $635,817.35 $1,824,324.71 $109,843.38 $ 332,162.72 $ 31,554.07 $ 37,141.98 $ 29,295.53 $ 7,757.64 15,731.14 12,686.86 28,742.09 31,299.36 28,981.28 $ 68,053.80 $ 84,172.48 $ 70,963.67 $ $ 2,246.9'9*$ 72,340.05 $ 38,879.71 $ 63,325.96* 4,356.61 89,232.55* 25,883.59 $152,558.51* $30,240.20 43,451.75* 6,675.58 $109,106.76* $23,564.62 $ 15,927.71* 6,953.07 97,991.58 $ 36,175.64 89,022.73 223.189.95 $ 23,509.37* 82,478.72* 88,111.08 24,762.12 $64,601.71 $57,716.60* 6,639.49* 43,415.66* $71,241.20 $14,300:94* k$ 8,619.48 $14,261.30* 6,646.43* $ 1,654.80 $ 5,806.07 $ 814.44 241.39* 3,744.56, 2,290.90 5,794.07 5,587.24* 2,949.82* 4,779.55* 13,316.61* 2.475.06* $ 2.449.54 $ 3.317.42 $ 6.708.10* 108,972.77 $ 3,452.65* $ 9,,402.61 *$ 5,302.06 $ 7,553.20* $ 11,018.68 $ 9,923.92 $ 24,986.92 $ 3,790.25 $ 8,770.19 $ 6,534.68 $ 19,095.12 $ 254.07 $ 2,248.49 $ 3,389.24 $ 5,891.80. 61.93* 63.06 29.03 1.02* 85.78* 21.49* 108.29* 28.92 23.85 84.55 137,32 10.17 14.68 518.75 -0- 10.35 c-ofir -0- 518.75 5.35% 4.77% 518.75 7.64% 5.21% 902.69 2,315.56 2,202.29 1,649.81 6,167.66 1,412.87* 2,202.29* 1,649.81* 5,264.97 $ 10,956 75 $ 9,986 98 $ 26,437 39 $ 6,104.79 $ 10,886.70$ 8,163.00 $ 25,154.49 $ 611.13* $ 70.05 $ 1,823.98 $.1,282.90 $ 73.894.19 $ 54.168.75 $ 127,856.96 $ 3,857.80 $ 83,226.75 $ 47,042.71 $ 134,127.26 $ 4,063.78* $ 9,332.56*$ 7,126.04 $ 6,270.30* F 7 __ 'T TO N`T SALES:. �::ss�y•r 14.74% 15.51% 14.35% 14.94% 14.20% 16.52% 14.73% 15.40% _- a -ct,-, expenses 16.42 8.99 9.00 10.17 14.68 8.88 9.52 10.35 c-ofir 1.68 %* 6.52% 5.35% 4.77% .48 %* 7.64% 5.21% 5.05% ::.er ircune 1.62 1.14 1.21 1.24 1.32 1.14 1.09 1.17 NET INCO .• ° ,06/.* 7.66% 6.56% � 6.01% 84% 8.78/. 6.30% 6.22% 7 September 8, 1977 James G..Cardle, M.D. Southdale Pediatric Associates, Ltd. Suite 310 7250 France Avenue So. Edina, MN 55435 Dear Dr. Cardle: 4001 WEST FIFTIETH STREET > EDINA, MINNESOTA 89424 92%.886 � Your comments concerning the Newsletter and the liquor.store advertisement in.it. have been thoroughly considered. In order to place the entire subject -in proper perspective, it should be noted that the City has been in the liquor dispensary business since 1948, during which time close.to $5,000,000 has been received for park, recreation and general fund purposes. Braemar golf courses and ice facilities were financed by issuing bonds, payment of which is guaranteed by .liquor profits. Currently, the 1977 budget contemplates $365,000 as profit on the liquor operations from total sales of approximately $4,000,000. One mill on the property tax produces about $385,000 and the'City levies 8.4 mills, so the liquor contribution is equal to 12% of the property tax. About four or five years ago, when fair trade pricing was eliminated by action of the State Legislature and the downtown papers began to accept liquor advertising, the City started newspaper advertising, expending about $25,000 in various media yearly. Also, about this time several new stores opened near Edina. During the past few months we have ceased our newspaper advertising and have issued additional Newsletters, charging the costs to the liquor fund. The last issue cost about $3,000, $1,600 for printing and $1,400 for postage. The last time citizens of Edina expressed an official opinion on the liquor stores was in 1960 when State law required.a vote on whether to continue the stores after the community exceeded the 10,000 population limit., The result was 5,200 in favor with less than 200 opposed. We have received very few complaints on our advertising. If we are in the business we should do as good a job as possible of advising those who patronize liquor stores of our price policies. I am sorry that you found the Newsletter ad offensive. After reviewing it, I can- not come to any conclusion but that the ad merely attempts to explain to those citizens of Edina who use the stores what our price policy is. Sinc e Y9u , arren y City Manager WCH /md bcc: Council Flo MEMO TO: Mayor Van Valkenburg and City Council Warren C. Hyde, City Manager Jerry Dalen, Finance Director Arlin Waelti, Administrative Assistant FROM: Mark Bernhardson, Administrative Assistant DATE: September 7, 1977 SUBJECT: LOCAL GOVERNMENT STATE AIDS - 1978 Appendices: A. 1977 -78 Local Aids Comparisons For the fourth consecutive year, Edina will receive $843,138 in State Aid under the Local Government Aid Law (MS 477A). Although only one of five types of revenue that the City receives from the State (Highway User Funds, Attached Machinery Aids, Police and Fire Aids), it represents the single most important of these aids (88%), and about 14% of Edina's revenues. Two. changes of importance were made to this Law during the 1977 Legislative Session. The first of.these changes is an increase in the amount of monies distributed . to each of the counties, from $45 per capita to $52 per capita, for 1978, and $59 for'1979• The second change is in the method of calcu- lating a local unit's population. Based -on preliminary figures, these changes resulted in at least minimal increases in local government aids for most of the municipalities in-the Metropolitan area. (The figures cited herein are termed preliminary as the State Revenue Department is attempting to resolve a challenge by the City of St. Paul as to the sales ratio that the Department determined for the City.) The only "major" municipalities to receive the same amount in 1978 that they receive this year are Edina, Roseville and Wayzata. Representative per capita figures are as follows: 1977 1978 % CHANGE Edina $19.14 $18.13 - 5.3% Bloomington 25.18 27.63. 9.7% St. Louis Park 28.10, 29.68 5.6% Richfield 29.20 33.62 15.1% Golden Valley 28.15 28.64 1.7% -- Minneapolis 76.39 91.32 19.5% St. Paul 60.02 64.81 7.9% Brooklyn Center 28.41 29.13 2.5% Roseville 22.15 21.61 - 2.5% Bemidji 63.73 78.82 23.7% Moorhead 41.94 49.37 17.7% Rochester 42.92 49.98 16.4% The overall figure distributed on a per capita basis in Hennepin County for 1978 is approximately $55.89, 14.9% increase from the 1977 figure of $48.62. In Ramsey County, the 1977 figure was $46.66 with the 1978 figure to be $50.37, an 8.0% increase. Aid Distribution In all cf the areas outside the seven county Metropolitan area, the .local aids.are distributed on a county by county basis. Each county is given a total amount based solely on its population.'. This money is then dis- bursed among the various jurisdictions within the county (including county, municipalities and townships) by the three factor formula of population, mill rate and sales ratio. The only outstate exception to this type of distribution is St. Louis County where the County government does not receive any portion of the aids. For the seven county metro area, the distribution is handled in a slightly different manner. The Metro.area is treated as one "county" with the full seven county population used to determine the initial amount of money. The three factor formula is then used to determine each instrumentality's share of the total. As was true for St. Louis County, neither Hennepin nor Ramsey receive any portion of the local aid funds. The reason for this is that the three counties are given special aids that are not available to other counties. (The State Revenue Department is responsible for the calculation of these aids.) The formula used1to determine the distribution is the product of three factors mentioned that gives an aid distirbution factor for each unit. These factors are then totalled for the entire county /metro area and each unit is then given funds from the State based on the "percentage that their distribution factor is of the County's /metro area total. Population As indicated, the method. for determining popul.ation for a community was changed by the last Legislature. Prior to the change, the figure used was from the 1970 census. The current law permits a couple of other- methods of calculating the amount. Of the following methods, the one yielding the highest population is used in all cases: ..1. 1970 population 2. An average of the 1970 population and: a. A special census taken by either the municipality or the Secretary of State or: b. the Metropolitan Council estimate Edina's 1970 census population was 44,046 with a 1977 Metropolitan Council estimate of 48,960, yielding an average 40 for aid purposes of 46,503. The 1970 census figures were used for Richfield, St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Minneapolis and Brooklyn Center. -2- Mill Rate Average The Mill Rate Average combined with the Sales Ratio is used to measure the tax effort of a community. The State averages the community's mill rate fo.r the previous three years to get the factor for the formula. Edina's mill rates for the past three years are: 1975 - 6.956.. 1976 - 8.155 3 year average - 7.853 1977 - 8.446 Mill rate averages for adjoining communities ranges from 14.079 for Bloomington to 47.320 for Minneapolis. A special provision in the 1977 Legislation allowed Minneapolis and St. Paul to include the special levies that were outside their levy limitation for determination of their mill rate. There was also the provision in the law that if either community was not at their levy limit that they could use the levy limit instead of the actual mill rate in figuring the average. (These pro- visions were not available to other municipalities.) Sales Ratio The final factor used is that of the sales ratio. This is the ratio of the assessor's limited market value to the "actual" sales price of properties appraised and sold during the previous three years. The State Revenue Depart- ment determines the ratio by using the prices listed on the Certificate of Real Estate value (minus the personal property sold in the transaction) which is originated by the purchaser, seller, or agent. The "quirk" in this is that the.originator can list a certain amount of the property as personal property with little guidance or restriction on the amount that is listed. (Needless to say, the larger the amount listed as personal property, the less the real estate value sold, which in turn means the less capita} gains that have to be paid on the property.) Independent action by those initiating the form can greatly influence a unit's sales ratio apart from the sales price. Edina's sales ratio as calculated for 1978 by the State is 94.9 %, down from the 95.9% ratio used for 1977. Ratios for nearby communities ranges from 86-90% with several experiencing a decrease from the previous year. Vis -a-vis other Hennepin County communities, Edina's taxpayers are paying a dispropor- tionate share to the County if the sales ratio is correct on a relative basis. "The Grandfather" The saving grace for Edina in this matter is that the law specifically states that no instrumentality shall receive less local government aid than it did the previous year. Edina has received the same amount since 1974. Had this provision not been included, Edina would have received approximately $608,840 for 1977 and $753,870 in 1978. The local government aid package was originally passed in 1974 to replace several other State aids that each had a different. method for determining distribution (mortgage registry, bank excise, - liquor and cigarettes tax and the State sales tax monies). The rational for the "grandfather" was that the new Legislation should not place a community in a less advantageous position because of the new law. It appears from the Legis- lation that the grandfather will be good through 1979. - 3 - Local Aid Calculation Edina's "distribution factor" is derived as follows: Population Average Mill Rate Sales Ratio Distribution Factor 46,503 X .007851 X .949 _ 346.563468 The preliminary total for the distribution factors for the seven county Metropolitan area is 43327.798694. Dividing Edina's distribution factor by the seven county total yields the local aid ratio of .0079986. Multi- plying that factor times the amount of money available for distribution to. the metro area ($94,875,379) yields Edina's aid amount of $758,870.20 had the grandfather not been in effect. For Edina to have reached its grandfathered amount solely on the basis of its distribution factor, the City would have had.to: A. Have a population of 59,382 to yield an average of 51,714; B. Have a sales ratio of 1.05533 which would have.meant (given the mill rate for 1977 of 8.446) an additional $179,708 paid by the City resident's in 1977 just for City government (plus $777,551 for the other jurisdictions except the school bid). C. Have a mill rate that: 1. Averaged .88 of a mill above that levied in the proceeding three years (75, 76, 77) , or 2. Have a mill rate of 10.493 in 1977 to have raised the average to 8.733 for the formula. (Had the mill rate been raised to 10.493 in 1977, Edina taxpayers would have had to pay an additional $787,088 to the City treasury.) For Edina to have attempted to raise the distribution factor by either of the last two methods, they would have encountered problems with the levy limitation law unless they took advantage of the one time provision that permits a local government to exceed the limit by 10% subject to a reverse referendum by the voters. Had the grandfather not been in effect, these methods would have yielded the City about $86,947 in additional State aids. With the grandfather, they would yield no extra aid at this point. If Edina "maintains" its local government aid ratio for 1979, it will receive about $883,777 in local government aid. Conclusion The options to get more State aid seem to be as follows: A. Lobby for the following.changes by the Legislature: 1. Have the current population estimates be the sole value used for the population factor in the Metro area (or at least the full estimate for communities that have grown - and not just an average). 2. Have.an inflation factor added to the grandfather (using 1974 as the base). 3. Have the State Revenue Department administered mill levy limitation removed. 4. Revamp, the entire method of distribution of aids. 5. Investigate the feasibility and effects of deriving a mill rate equivalent.for special assessments as part of the mill rate average factor. B. Take the following actions: 1. Raise the mill rate. 2. Use a reverse referendum method to go up to 10% over the levy limitation for 1979. 3. Take the certain special levies outside of the levy limitation. 4. Begin funding more special assessments with general fund monies (provided that the mill levy limitation is raised). 5. The amount of State aid can be raised if.the Sales Ratio Is increased through assessing practices and the mill rate lowered to produce the same revenue for the City. This, however, means that taxpayers in Edina are paying an even greater disproportionate share to other taxing authorities (County in particular). Many of the other communities have been playing the local aid game. and Edina should continue to take into account the effect -that its assessing and taxing policies (and those of others in the Metro area) have on the local government aid received. It is doubtful that the amount distributed by the State will decrease and steps should be taken to insure that Edina will.not suffer in the future because of local government aid distribution. Rk� \a Bernhardson Administrative Assistant Note: The figures oiven fez 1978 are tentative figures at this point due to a challenge of St. Paul's Sales Ratio. 1977 -1978 LOCAL AID COMPARISON ° xiviRUMENTALITY . POPULATION MILL RATE AVE. SALES RATIO DISTRIBUTION PRELIMINARY/ MINIMUM FI11AL LOCAL GOVT "CURRENT" PER. CAPITA . ANT /FINAL FACTOR AID AID AID RATIO ` Hennepin 1977 960,080 23,404.500456 $47,300,350 $31,448,085. $46,680,444 48.62 County 1978 987,888 25,305.945160 55,216,739 46,951,123 55,216,741 55.89 Total % 2.9% 8.1% 16.7% 49.3% 18.3% 14.9% Edina 1977 44,046 .007132 .959 301.256493 600,837 643,137 843,137 .0074384 19.14 (13.82)• 18.13 1978 46,503 .007853 .949 346.563468 750,874 843,137 .843,137 .0079986 (16.26) % 5.58 % 10.1% (1.05)% 15% 24.6%. -. 7.5% ( 5.3 %) Richfield 1977 47,231 .016285 .908 698.394406 1,411,450 863,638 1,378,206 .0172443 29.20 1978 47,231 .017037 .911 733.058512 1,605,177 1,378,163 1,587,735 .0169188 33.62 - 4.6% .3% 4:9% 13.7% 59:5% 15.6% (1.9%) 15.9% St. Louis 1977 48,883 .015450 .922 696.333447 1,407,285 1,240,919 1,373,764 .0171933 28.10 Park 1978. 48,883 .015449 .887 669.856605 1,466,792. 1;374,096-1,450,847 .0154602 29.68 96 _ - (3.8 %) (3.9%) 4.2 %. 10.7% 5.7% (10.1)% 5.6% Blooming- 1977 81,970 .013962 .914 1,046.041138 2,114,042 1,731,575 2,063,719 .0258280 25.18 ton 1978 81,970 .014079 .906 1,045.574401 2,289,504 2,064,184 2,264,616 .0241317 27.63 % - .84% (.9 %). (.0001 %). 8.2% 19.2% 9.7% (6.6 %) 9.7% Minnetonka 1977 35,776 .016878 .867 523,518253 1.058,027. 746,295 1,032,879 .0129263 28.87 1978 38,238 - .017568 .864 .580.405119 1,270,912 1,033,074 1,257,103 .0133956 32.88 % 6.9% 4% (.3 %) 10.91% 20.1% 38.4% 21.7% 3.6% 13.9% Plymouth 1977 18,077 .009707 .867 153.714733 310,656.. 381,058 380.825 .0037954 21.07 1978 22,589 .010370 .858 200.984724 440,098 361,059 435,314 .0046387 19.27 9! 24.9% 6.8% (1 30.75% 41.6% _ 14.3% 22.2% (8.6 %) Brooklyn 35,173 .016213 .808 506.390746 1.023,412 646,714 999,309 .0125034 28.41 Center ,1977 1978 35,173 .016107 .835 473.053812 1,035,049 999,309 1,024,590 .0109180 29.13 % - (.7 %) (6 %) (6.6 %) 1.2% 54.5% 2.5% (12.7 %) 2.5% Minneapolis.1977 434,400 .043700 .886 16,819.186080 $33,991,471$20,483,474 $33,184,632 .4152867 76.39 1978 434,400 .047320 .891 18,315.224958 40,105,056 33,189,791 39,669,059 .4227130 91.32 % - 8.3% .6% 8.9% 17.9% 62.% 19.5% 1.8% .. 19.5% Golden 1977 24,246 .014589 .942 333.208850 673,413 682,855 682,437 .0082233 28.15 Valley 1978 24,246 .015217. .869 320.618751 702;058 -'. 682,856 694,430 .0073998 28.64 % - 4.3 %' (7.8 %) (3.7/.) 4.3% - 1.7% (10.1 %) 1.7% Ramsey 1977 476,255 11,052.921643 22,337,886 16,275,259 22,224,178 46.66 County 1978 487,855 11,129.783227 24,574,277 22,432,680 24,574,277 50.37 Total % 2.4% 6.9y 10% 37.8% 10.5 %' Roseville 1977 34,438 .011524 .782 310.347266 627,209. 763,004 762,537 .0076628 22.15 1978 35.299 .011915 .748 314.599514 688,880 763,005 763,005 .0072609 21.61 % 2.5% 3.4% (4.4 %) 1.4% 9.8% - - 5.3% (2.5 %) St.Paul 1977 309,866 .039445 .771 9,423.674229 19,045.187 13,018,567 18,596,657 .2326822 60.02 1978 309,866 .040382 .741 9.272.139530.20,303;302 18.596,012 20,082,584 .2139997 64.81 % - 2.3% (3.9%) (1.7 %) 6.6% 42.8% 7.9% (8.1 %) 7.9% • These are the per capita figures had the "Grandfather" not been in effect. Note: The figures oiven fez 1978 are tentative figures at this point due to a challenge of St. Paul's Sales Ratio. STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION MONTHLY REPORT AUGUST '1977 I. ACTIVITIES WITH POLICE, COURT SERVICES, AND SCHOOLS A. Bloomington 1. Mr. Powell met with Mr. Mike Studer, Bloomington Juvenile Officer to discuss the relationship between the police and the Storefront during the coming school year. Another meeting will be held when all school liaison officers are back in their positions. (Many of the liaison officers work with the patrol division during the summer). B. Edina 1. Ms. Powell and Mr. Anderson attended a one day in service training program on chemical dependency which was held for the counseling staff at the Edina schools. The training was done. by Mr. Bill Summers, Mr. Don Anderson, and Mr. Ted Perkins, all of whom work with the chemical dependency programs at Wayzata High School. 2. Mr. Harr and Mr. Bigalke attended meetings of seventh, eighth, and ninth grade home room teachers at Edina West Lower Division. Mr. Harr and Mr. Bigalke were introduced to about 90 teachers and explained Youth Action and the services that the Youth Action staff were available to provide. C. Richfield 1. Nothing to report. D. Other 1. Mr. Lepinski, Mr. Scott Beaty, and Mr. Dennis Brouillette met with .Mr. Sid Holden, intake probation officer, to introduce Mr. Beaty and Mr. Brouillette who will be developing a program for property offenders at Storefront /Youth Action. Mr. Holden explained the intake process and shared his ideas on the need for a diversion program for shop lifters and vandals. 2. Mr. Lepinski,-Mr. Beaty and Mr. Brouillette visited the juvenile detention center, toured the facility, and received an explanation of the program there. - 2 - 3. Mr. Anderson met with Mr. Dave Knutsen, counselor at at Eden Prairie High School, to discuss the chemical dependency programs at Eden Prairie High School. Mr. Anderson will continue to consult with Mr. Knutsen. II. COMMUNITY EDUCATION 1. Nothing to report. III. MAJOR COMMUNITY MEETINGS 1. Mr. Anderson attended the August meeting of the Education and Training section of the Minnesota Chemical Dependency Association. IV. CONSULTATION, RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, NEW PROJECTS /ACTIVITIES 1. Mr. Lepinski attended a meeting facilitated by the Sout;z Hennepin Human Services Council to discuss the possibility of Contact Plus placing a worker in Bloomington, Contact Plus is a group coulseling program for teen -age girls. It is a program of the YWCA, funded by the United Way, and currently operating only in Minneapolis. Present at the meeting were Mr. Mike Moore, director of Contact Plus, Ms. Mary Andrews, Human Resources Manager for the city of Bloomington, and Mr. Randy Johncox, director of Side by Side, and Mr..Phil Riveness, director of the South Hennepin Human Services Council. A follow up meeting was held with and Mr: Tom Jacobs, side by side, among the three programs as youth in Bloomington, Ms. Moore intends talk with his board and then he w: Lepinski. Mr. Lepinski, Mr. Moore to discuss cooperation serving agencies working to talk with the schools, L11 get back to Mr. 2. Mr. Powell took members of his out - patient group on a back packing and camping trip to Colorado. All expenses were paid by the participants. The trip was successful and according to Mr. Powell very beneficial for all the youth involved. V. LONG RANGE PLANNING, FUNDING, AND _ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS 1. Mr. Lepinski and Ms. Sue Bonoff, Storefront /Youth Action treasured, met with the Edina Human Relations Commission to discuss Storefront /Youth Action's 1978 budget request to the city of Edina. Storefront /Youth Action has requested $16,000. for 1978. The Human Relations Commission has been asked by the city council to make a recommendation concerning Storefront /Youth Action's funding. 2. The resignation of Mr. Ken Beitler oa Esecutive Director of the Hennepin Area Youth Diversion Program, ( HAYDP) and the cessation of LEAA funding for the HAYDP on August 19 1977, has resulted in a reevaluation of the structure of the HAYDP and of the position of Executive Director. - 3 - Two meetings were held in August to consider possible changes in organizational structure and in the job descriptions of the Executive Director.. Mr. Lepinski and Mr. Robert E. Wheeler represented Storefront /Youth Action at the first meeting. Mr. Lepinski, Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Bernie Greensweig, and Ms. Mary Andrews were present at the second meeting. Mr. Wheeler, Mr. Greensweig, and Ms. Andrews are on the Storefront /Youth Action board of directors. No decisions were reached at these meetings and a third meeting will be held in early September. VI. TRAINING RECEIVED 1. The staff at Storefront /Youth Action attended a two hour training session on Self Defeating Behavior. The training was done by Dr. Robert Hardy, a licensed consulting psychologist. Dr. Hardy works for the Richfield School system, and is also in private practice. 2. Ms. Joan Weber attended a two week summer school program on chemical dependency offered by the Johnson Institute. Ms. Weber served as a facilitator of groups at the school in exchange for her tuition. 3. Mr. Robert Anderson sttended three sessions on "Neurosis and Depression" which were offered by the Alfred Adler Institute. 4. Mr. Robert Anderson attended a four session series on communication which was conducted by the Family Renewal Center. VII. STAFF VACANCIES 1. Mr. Tim Bigalke was hired as a youth worker to work in the Youth Action program. Mr. Bigalke began employment on August 22. 2. Mr. Scott Beatty and Mr. Dennis Brouillette were hired as youth workers to work with recently funded Property Offender Program. Mr. Beaty began employment on Aug. 22, and Mr. Brouillette began on August 24. VIII. CHEMICAL ORIENTATION PROGRAM (C.O.P.) 1. No C.O.P. was offered during July. The C.O.P. will begin again in September. 2. Beginning in September the C.O.P. will be conducted at House of Prayer Lutheran Church in Richfield rather than at Oak Grove Presbyterian Church in Bloomington. The dhange was made to make the lacation more accessible to Storefront /Youth Action staff. IX. COUNSELOR ACTIVITY NAME INTAKES TERMINATIONS FOLLOW -UPS WOLFF 7 15 12 POWELL, D. 3 - - WEBER 5 15 - ANDERSON 7 4 6 HARR 1 - - WERNICK 3 5 - POWELL, J. 1 42- - 22 7$ STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING August 11, 1977 Members Present: Mr. Bernie Greensweig Ms. Mary Andrews Mr. Bob Wheeler Staff Present: Mr. Steve Lepinski Ms. Sherol Ingram Due to the low number of board members present, there were not enough members in attendance to have a quarum. No official board meeting was held on this date. STOREFRONT /YOUTH ACTION BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SEPTEMBER 8TH 1. Call to order. 2. Approval of Minutes. 3. Introduction of new staff. 4. Directors Report.. 5. Report on Reorganization of HAYDP — Bob Wheeler. 6. Personnel Issues A. Consideration of Head Counselor Position. B. Reccominendation to make Chemical Dependency Counselor position at Youth Action full time during school year. C. Salary adjustments.' 1 Joan Wernick $6,000. to $6,600 (2 time) 2 Steve Lepinski 7. Board of Directors Orientation Program. 8. Other. 9. Adjournment. I 11 EDINA ADVISORY BOARD OF HEALTH MEETING: September 6, 1977 -Edina City Hall Conference Room A G E N D A -Dr. C. V. Rockwell, Chairman presiding • I. Roll Call II. Minutes III. Announcements and Reports .A. Community Health Services Hearing - June Schmidt, Bev Harris B. South Hennepin Human Services Council - Linda Bjerke C. House File #1 Forum, Minneapolis - Dave Velde D. Message from Mayor, Attendance Ordinance - Ken Esse IV. Adoption of Resolution for Final Draft of CHS Proposal V. -Agreement Allowing City Licensing of Hotel /Motels VI. Request for Hearing on House File 1 /Senate File 459 in Edina Area VII. Adjournment Jac Ul m BEP,MAN AND LAZAPTJS FRANK R. BERMAN BARRY M.LAZARUS KARLA R. WAHL September 7, 1977 Ms. Florence Hallberq_ City Clerk Edina Administrative offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Hallberg: __--t TITUS BUILDING -SUITE 405 6550 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 920-2300 Please note the Cafe Galleria is withdrawing its request to be placed on the agenda at the City Council meeting of September 12, 1977, concerning its application to obtain a wine and beer license. However, we anticipate renewing its request to be placed on the agenda in the near future.. Thank you. Very truly yours, BERMAN AND LAZARUS Barry Lazarus BL:bh cc: Mr. Sheldon Berlatsky Ej 1 ,a, ©lam BERMAN AND LAZARUS FRANK R. BERMAN BARRY M. LAZARUS KARLA R. WAHL Ms. Florence Hallberg City Clerk Edina Administrative Offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Hallberg: TITUS BUILDING-SUITE 405 6550 YORK AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 AREA CODE 612 TELEPHONE 920-2300 September 6, 1977 SFP s 1971 L��rf of &jig Please note the undersigned represents Cafe Galleria, 3460 West 70th Street, Edina, Minnesota. Not only the Cafe Galleria, but DeLaria's (all located in the Southdale Restaurant and The Empress Restaurant ( Fashion Mall, and Cicero's, 7101 France interested in obtaining a wine and beer respective restaurants. Dayton's, Donaldson's, Center), Le Bistro located in the Yorktown Avenue South, are license for their It is my understanding that Edina has not yet adopted an ordinance which allows restaurants to obtain wine and beer, licenses notwithstanding the State of Minnesota allowance of municipalities to adopt such an ordinance. Accordingly, it is the request of Mr. Sheldon Berlatsky of Cafe Galleria that.the city council.place on its agenda at the meeting of September 12, 1977, the request of Mr. Berlatsky to authorize an election by the voters of Edina to adopt an ordinance allowing the issuance of wine and beer licenses. (If for some reason the city is authorized to issue such licenses and this fact is unknown to me, Mr. Berlatsky, for himself and on behalf of the other restaurants wishes to discuss the issuance of wine and beer licenses being issued to the respective restaurants.) Thank you. Very truly yours, BERMAN AND LAZARUS BL:jas Barry Lazarus cc: Mr. Sheldon Berlatsky