HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977-12-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 19, 1977
7:00 Y.M.
ROLLCALL
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Pre-
sentation by City Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution Ordering Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass.
A. Scriver Road in Taft Addition Improvements
1. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -347
2. Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -331
3. Street Improvement No. P -BA -232.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PLANNING.MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Pre-
sentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading of Zoning
Ordinance requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
to pass Second Reading or if Second Reading should be waived. Lot Divisions
Plats, Flood Plain Permits and Appeals from Administrative or Board of Appeals
and Adjustments decisions require action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable roll -
call vote to pass.
A. Year IV Community Development Block Grant Program - First Hearing .
B. Brookview Heights 5th Addition - Preliminary Plat - Generally located
East of Cahill Road and Nine Mile Creek, West of M.N.& S. Tracks and North
of W. 70th St. (an extension of Limerick Lane)- S -77 -21 (11/30/77)
C. Edina Interchange 6th Addition - Preliminary Plat - Generally located East
of Metro Blvd., West of T.H. 100 and North of Edina Industrial Blvd.
S -77 -26 (11/30/77)
D. Dewey Hill Addition - Preliminary Plat — Generally located North of W. 78th
Street, West of Braemar Park and South of Dewey Hill Road -S-77-27 (11/30/77)
E. Banco Properties, Inc. - Generally located at Washington Ave. and Valley
View Road
1. Rezoning from PID Planned Industrial District to 0 -1 Office District
Z -77 -20 (11/30/77)
2. Northwestern Bank Addition - Preliminary Plat- S -77 -28 (11/30/77)
F. Ordinance Amendment - Laundries as Principal Use in C -1 Commercial
District - First Reading. Continued from 12/5/77.
G. Final Plat Approval
1. Taft Addition
III. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Mrs. Sumner E. Whitney - 51st & France
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of December 13 ,1977
B. Suit - Trent G. Jutting
C. Transfer of Year III Block Grant Allocation
D. 1978 Community Health Services with Bloomington (Continued from 12/5/77)
.E. Association of Metro Municipalities - Legislative Policy for 1978
F. Legal Fees - SAC Lawsuit
Edina City Council Agenda
December 19, 1977
Page ,'Two
G. 'Restated Articles of Incorporation =Edina Foundation
H. Status of Revisions. to Tax Increment:Financing Legislation
I. Report of M.A.M.A. -320 Negotiating Committee
J. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date (January 16, 1978)
K. Youth Action Contract
V. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Sign for 50th Street Liquor Store
B. Compact Squad Cars
C. Administrative Sedan
D. 3/4 ton Passenger Van
E. 3/4 ton Cargo Van
F. 1/2 ton Pickup Truck
G. 10,000 GVW 4wd.Truck
H.% Sewer Rodder
I. Pickup Sweeper
J. 4wd Articulated Loader
K. Pager Monitors
L. Underbody Scrapers
M. Aerial Survey Maps (Continued from 12/5/77)
N. Repairs to Hi- Ranger
VI. RESOLUTIONS
A. 1st National Bank of Minneapolis - Collateral Pledge
VII. ANYOTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
VIII. FINANCE
A. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by for
payment of the following claims as per Pre - List: General Fund $174,335.24;
Park Fund $1,956.92; Art Center $1,511.97; Park Construction $2,299.77;
Swimming Pool $49.91; Golf Course $1,735.36;. Arena $4,210.80; Gun
Range $16.29; Water Works $7,428.16; Sewer Fund $2,185.17; Liquor
Fund $211,161.27; Construction Fund $93,648.22; IBR $382.00;
Total $500,921.08
I
C
CL,-(
ij
T'J.
IL
cL-f cdj—c
a c-,--t7, CL,&,
CIL
2.cueli
4L.
1.
December 18, 1977
Chief Robert Buresh
Director of Public Safety
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Bob:
I would like to say a special "thank you" to the kind men -- both of the
Police and Fire Departments -- who assisted when Ray was taken to the
hospital.
Because our doctor said that he would call the ambulance himself to
take Ray to Abbott Hospital, I did not call the City's emergency number.
But they were there anyway!!!! Those kind and reassuring.men standing by
to assist the Smith Ambulance parmedics in any way they could and being
so very'considerate.
I saw them work, too, in their quiet and efficient way, just two months
before when they assisted my next door neighbor. Edina is indeed for -
tunate to have men of this caliber and I would appreciate it if you
would convey my deep appreciation to all those who helped us that morning.
Sincerely,
cc: Mayor and Council
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Warren C. Hyde, Senior Management Consultant
-)-- I -L -L-
MEMORANDUM
November 30, 1977
To: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Members of the Council
From: Q Arlin Waelti,.Administrative Assistant
Re: 1978 Community Health Services Contract with Bloomington
Two weeks ago, I met with Yvonne Hargens and Herb Freye, Deputy Manager of
the City of Bloomington to discuss the terms of the 1978 Community Health
Services Contract between the cities of Bloomington and Edina. The
transitional language of the contract, necessary in the first year, was
removed. Other than that, the contract remains substantially the same
as the 1977 contract. A copy of the contract is attached.
Subject to Council approval, we have tentatively agreed to a six percent
increase over the 1977 figure of $75,181.40, resulting in a cost of
$79,692.29 in 1978. Using the 1975 Hennepin County population estimate of
45,290, this means that we would be paying $1.76 per capita in 1978 as
compared with $1.66 per capita in 1977. I am satisfied with both the
tentative financial terms for the 1978 contract and the excellent performance
of the Bloomington Health Service over this past year.
I have invited Yvonne Hargens to the Council meeting to briefly explain the
basic Community Health Service activities of the last year and to answer
any questions that you may have.
AW:md
attachment
731�- D
91 1Y I :. kI1 1151
November 30, 1977
To: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Members of the Council
�V
From: Q'Arlin Waelti, Administrative Assistant
Re: 1978 Community Health Services Contract with Bloomington
Two weeks ago, I met with Yvonne Hargens and Herb Freye, Deputy Manager of
the City of Bloomington to discuss the terms of the 1978 Community Health
Services Contract between the cities of Bloomington and Edina. The
transitional language of the contract, necessary in the first year, was
removed.. Other than that, the contract remains substantially the same
as the 1977 contract. A copy of the contract is attached.
Subject to Council approval, we have tentatively agreed to a six percent
increase over the 1977 figure of $75,181.40, resulting in a cost of
$79,692.29 in 1978. Using the 1975 Hennepin County population estimate of
45,290, this means that we would be paying $1.76 per capita in 1978 as
compared with $1.66 per capita in 1977. I am satisfied with both the
tentative financial terms for the 1978 contract and the excellent performance
of the Bloomington Health Service over this past year.
I have invited Yvonne Hargens to the Council meeting to briefly explain the
basic Community Health Service activities of the last year and to answer
any questions that you may have.
AW:md
attachment
JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT
(Community Health Services)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
, 1977, by and between the CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota
( "Bloomington "), and the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation,
in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Edina "),
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of
Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance
with all applicable federal and state requirements; and
WHEREAS, Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides community
health services, including, but not limited to, nursing services, One health
services, disease prevention and control services, family planning services,
early detection of health problems, nutritional services, and health education;
and
WHEREAS, Edina desires to promote, support, and maintain the health
of its residents by providing community health services, including education,
disease prevention, early detection of health problems, and nursing care, at
a nominal fee to those making use of such services, and to contract with
Bloomington for Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, to provide
such services to residents of Edina; and
WHEREAS, the governing bodies of Bloomington and Edina are authorized
by Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.914, Subdivision 5, Section 145.917,.
-1-
Subdivision 3, and by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, to provide community
'health services and to enter into agreements with each other for the providing
by Bloomington of community health services to residents of Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for and in consideration of the
covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows:
1. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to
provide residents of Edina with the following community health services
( "Health Services "):
A. Home care services involving intermittent home visits by
nurses, aides, or therapists for individuals or families suffering illness,
with treatment to be provided in accordance with a medical plan of care deter-
mined either by Bloomington or by a qualified physician acceptable to Blooming-
ton, and periodic home visits for assessment, observation, evaluation, preventive
health techniques, and follow -up of clinical findings.
B. Adult health services consisting of clinical sessions in the
areas of family planning, venereal disease and communicable disease prevention,
and clinical services for well women dealing with gynecologic health screening,
teaching, and counseling on female health issues.
C. Children health services comprising clinical sessions for
well children, early and periodic screening, and communicable disease testing
and immunization.
D. Public health informational and educational services,
including providing any and all groups requesting the same with speakers on
health - related topics, and assisting such groups in developing health programs.
E. School health support services involving screening, teaching,
and counseling of students.
-2-
F. Senior citizen health services, including clinical screening,
therapeutic visits, outreach contacts, counseling, teaching, nutritional
services, and well -adult visits.
., G.. Counseling on any or all of the foregoing health services,
with individuals, couples, families, and groups requesting the same, including
chemical dependency counseling.
2. The Health Services shall be provided and rendered hereunder to
the residents of Edina in the same manner, to at least the same extent, and
with at least the same quality and kind of personnel, equipment, and facilities
as the Health Services are provided and rendered to residents of Bloomington,
it being the intent and purpose of this Agreement to provide and render the
Health Services equally to residents of Bloomington and Edina, without dis-
crimination in any way. In addition, Bloomington agrees (i) to provide the
Health Services at paragraph 1.F. at such senior citizen centers as are from
time to time designated by Edina, and (ii) to provide mobile mini - clinics at
least six (6) times during the term of this Agreement for special uses such as
blood pressure testing and immunizations, at appropriate locations in Edina,
including but not limited to Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, and the
Edina Senior Center, 7151 York Avenue South. The mobile mini - clinics shall be
set up on such days, and for such hours during such days, as Bloomington shall
determine, and need not be set up at the same time in all of said locations,
but during the term of this Agreement a mobile mini - clinic shall be set up at
least six (6) times, for a reasonable period of time, at each such location.
Bloomington shall give a schedule of dates and times when such mobile mini -
clinics,shall be established at least ten (10) days in advance of the scheduled
dates, except in emergency situations.
-3-
3. Bloomington shall provide the Health Services pursuant hereto
on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals.
4. All Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington
shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules,
and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington
City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws,
provided however, that (i) no such policy, rule, or procedure hereafter adopted
by the Bloomington.City Council shall in any way affect, modify, or change the
obligations, duties, liabilities, or rights of the parties hereto as set out
in this Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and quantity of
Health Services to be provided hereunder by Bloomington to residents of Edina,
and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures shall be uniformly applied
to all persons receiving Health Services from Bloomington, whether residents
of Edina, Bloomington, or any other municipality. Edina agrees to adopt the
same policies, rules, and procedures as are from time to time adopted by
Bloomington, if determined by Edina to be necessary or desirable to facilitate
or regulate the provision of Health Services by Bloomington to residents of
Edina pursuant hereto.
5. Edina agrees to pay to Bloomington, for the provision of Health
Services pursuant hereto, amounts and on terms as follows:
A. The annual sum of $79,692.28 ($1.76 per capita times 1975
county population estimate of 45,290) shall be paid in quarterly payments
of $19,923.07 to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by Edina
of each of the reports to be given pursuant to paragraph 5.B. hereof, subject,
however, to the provisions of paragraph 5.C. hereof.
-4-
i
3. Bloomington shall provide the Health Services pursuant hereto
on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals.
4. All Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington
shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules,
and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington
City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws,
provided however, that (i) no such policy, rule, or procedure hereafter adopted
by the Bloomington.City Council shall in any way affect, modify, or change the
obligations, duties, liabilities, or rights of the parties hereto as set out
in this Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and quantity of
Health Services to be provided hereunder by Bloomington to residents of Edina,
and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures shall be uniformly applied
to all persons receiving Health Services from Bloomington, whether residents
of Edina, Bloomington, or any other municipality. Edina agrees to adopt the
same policies, rules, and procedures as are from time to time adopted by
Bloomington, if determined by Edina to be necessary or desirable to facilitate
or regulate the provision of Health Services by Bloomington to residents of
Edina pursuant hereto.
5. Edina agrees to pay to Bloomington, for the provision of Health
Services pursuant hereto, amounts and on terms as follows:
A. The annual sum of $79,692.28 ($1.76 per capita times 1975
county population estimate of 45,290) shall be paid in quarterly payments
of $19,923.07 to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by Edina
of each of the reports to be given pursuant to paragraph 5.B. hereof, subject,
however, to the provisions of paragraph 5.C. hereof.
-4-
B. On April 15, July 15, and October 15, 1978 and on
January 15, 1979, Bloomington shall send to Edina a statement, certified by
the person in charge of Bloomington's Division of Public Health as being
true and correct, and covering the period of the three (3) calendar months
preceding the month in which the report is given, and setting forth, in such
detail as Edina from time to time shall reasonably require, the number of
persons served, the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where
such services were delivered, and such other information as Edina shall
reasonably request.
C. No payment or payments need be made by Edina under this
Agreement while Bloomington is in default under any of the terms and conditions
hereof to be by Bloomington performed.
6. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial books and
records of Bloomington relating to the providing of Health Services hereunder
by Bloomington, Bloomingtom shall make its financial books and records avail-
able at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any
agent, employee, or representative of Edina, at reasonable business hours.
7. It shall be the sole responsibility of Bloomington to determine
the qualifications, functions, training, and performance standards for all
health service personnel who render Health Services under this Agreement;
provided, however, that Bloomington agrees that all such personnel shall be
capable, trained professionals.
8. Bloomington's Division of Public Health will communicate with
the Edina Health Department, Edina Department of Safety, and Edina Department
of Parks and Recreation relative to Health Services to be performed hereunder
by Bloomington, such communication to be in the form of reports, conferences,
-5-
or consultations, as the respective Edina departments from time to time shall
request. Also, all reports relating to the providing of Health Services that
aie given by Bloomington's Division of Public Health to the Bloomington City
Council or to the City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also,
and at the same time, be given to Edina.
9. Bloomington also agrees to send to Edina an annual report
describing the activities performed and Health Services rendered pursuant to
this Agreement. Such report shall be in such detail and form as Edina may
reasonably from time to time request. The annual report shall be sent with
and in addition to the last quarterly report required by paragraph S.B. hereof.
Also, at Edina's request, made not more than two (2) times during the term of
this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's Division
of Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council or appropriate
board or commission to answer questions and give further information relative
to the activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement.
10. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present
policy of comprehensive liability insurance and medical malpractice insurance
in the minimum amount of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000), for the
term of this contract. A copy of the policy or policies issued shall be
furnished to Edina. Said policy shall be with an insurance company authorized
to do business in Minnesota.
11. This Agreement shall be for a period from January 1, 1978 to
December 31, 1978, provided that either party may terminate the same by
thirty (30) days' written notice to the other. Upon such termination, all
obligations and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall cease and terminate,
except that the provisions of paragraph 11 hereof shall continue and survive
-6-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
by
Its Mayor
and
Its Manager
CITY OF EDINA
Its Mayor
and
Its Manager
-8-
M
i
such termination. Also, In the event of termination pursuant hereto, the
quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period
ended on the date of termination, and Bloomington shall send to Edina, within
thirty (30) days after such termination, a report in the form required by
paragraph S.B., and shall also then send a final report in the form of, and in
lieu of, the annual report required by paragraph 10 hereof, and Edina shall pay
such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination,
within fifteen (15) days after receipt of both of such reports.
12. Bloomington and Edina understand and agree that each of them
shall apply and qualify, independently and separately, for any and all grants,
matching funds, and payments of all kinds from state, federal, and other
governmental bodies relating to, or for the provision of, any or all of the
Health Services, and any and all such grants, matching funds, and payments
shall belong to the recipient and be used and applied as the recipient thereof
I
shall determine, without regard to this Agreement.
13. All notices, reports, or demands required or permitted to be
L i
given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given
when delivered personally to any officer of the party to which notice is being
given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with
registered or certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the
parties at the following addresses:
To Bloomington: 2215 West Old Shakopee Road
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
Attention: Herbert Freye, Dep. City Manager
To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attention: City Manager
Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other party
given as herein provided.
-7-
i
i
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement
to be duly executed and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day
and year first above written.
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
by
Its Mayor
and
Its Manager
CITY OF EDINA
Its Mayor
and
Its Manager
-8-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR.MEETING OF THE -
EDINA ADVISORY HEALTH COMMITTEE HELD
DECEMBER 6, 1977 at 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM
I. Members Present: C. V. Rockwell, Chairman, Linda Bjerke, Tully Stoppel,
Leroy Werges, James Cardle, Verne Moss, Jr.,
Barbara Kresoya and'Bev Harris
Members Excused: Mary Bang, June Schmidt, Dr. E. D. Engstrom and
Dr. R. K. Simmons
Staff Present: K. Esse, Health Sanitarian, D. Velde, Assistant
. Health Sanitarian, Karen Sorensen, Secretary
II. Approval of November 1, 1977 Edina Advisory Health Committee Minutes
Chairman Rockwell moved for approval of the November 1, 1977 Advisory Board
Minutes with one correction. On page 6 under Proposed Meeting Day Change, the
word "second" Tuesday should be changed to "first" Tuesday. Mrs. Kresoya
seconded the motion. All Voted Aye. Motion Carried Mr. Esse noted that the
Resolution sent to the City Council by the Advisory Board relating to Senate
File No. 459, was adopted by the Council at its November 21, 1977 meeting.
III. Announcements and Reports:
A. Presentation of 1978 Slate of Officers
Chairman Rockwell noted that the nominating committee met after the
November 1, 1977 meeting to review candidates for 1978 Chairperson and Vice Chair-
person. The name submitted for Chairperson is Linda Bjerke and for Vice Chair-
person is Bev Harris. Dr. Cardle moved that the Board unanimously nominate these
ladies to the positions specified. Mr. Moss seconded the motion. All Voted Aye.
Motion Carried.
B. Bloomington Contract 6% above 1977 Contract
Edina has contracted with Bloomington again to provide our nursing
and clinic services. There is a 6% increase over the 1977 contract and the cost
is about $1.76 per capita.
Mrs. Bjerke asked if there was some way the Board could get any feed-
back on home nursing or any care received. Dr. Cardle stated that we contract.for
the services but we have no way of knowing how the residents feel about the service.
After some additional discussion, Mr. Moss moved that the Board
recommend approval of the Joint Powers Agreement with the following change found
on page 3. ". . and (ii) to provide mobile mini - clinics at least six (6) times
during the term.of this Agreement for special uses such as blood pressure testing
and immunizations, at appropriate locations ". Mrs. Harris seconded the motion.
All Voted Aye. Motion Carried.
Board-of Health Minutes
Page 2
December 6, 1977
C. Report on House File 1 and Senate File 459. D._.Velde.
Chairman Rockwell noted that Mayor Van Valkenberg had written a
letter to Commissioner Richard Kremer regarding HF1 and SF 459 in which he
stated that "we feel that social services must be kept separate from community
health services and that these two areas can be legislated separately without
detracting from .the quality of service of either program."
The Senate meeting on December 3, 1977, was an interim hearing on.
SF 459 and HF 1. The Committee was headed by Senator Solon and the purpose of
the meeting was for the State agencies to offer their testimony, namely, the
Department of Public Welfare, The Minnesota Department of Health and the
Department of Finance. Arthur Naftalin, University of Minnesota School of Public
Health, gave a summary of the different state grant categories. SF 459 and
HF l is a block grant program. Ed Dirkswager, Department of Public Welfare,
gave-his testimony on the legislation. He indicated that he was not in favor
of the passage of HF 1. In the past, the Department of Public Welfare has been
in favor of this legislation,..but has since changed its mind. He stated that
the DPW is becoming more accountable by implementing programs to coordinate
activities. They have started several pilot projects where they will try new
procedures and .improve their facilities. They also feel that with this change
in accountability and coordination, there should be more confidence in DPW
by the State.. DPW spends nearly 1 million dollars each year in services they
provide for the State. Under HF 1, there would be increased funding, however,
not all of that money would be earmarked for social services. The counties will
be coerced into forming human services boards because of the 10% increase subsidy
from the State.
Mr. Dirkswager also described Rule 36 which is a program requirement
under certain social service programs or activities in relation to mental health
programs. Under Rule 36, people in this category are eligible for certain
activity programs and it would amount to another $10 per day per person increase
in cost. Presently, they do not enforce Rule 36 because there is no money for
it. He stated that under HF 1, they would elect to enforce that rule.
Mr. Hiller, Minnesota Department of Health questioned the validity
of the planning process under HF 1 because if you develop a plan you will get
funding and if you don't develop a plan, you still get funding. He didn't like
the negative funding formula of HF 1. The formula for funding.is based on the
counties AFDC load. The higher the AFDC case load, the higher the state
subsidy. Also, he did not like the idea of mandating specific services.
In general, the Department of Health is in opposition to the lack of
focus in the .health services.
Senator Perpich is sponsoring the Bill.
Board of Health Minutes
Page 3
December 6, 1977
D. Report on Evaluation Clinic. D. Velde.
Mr. Velde reported that he and Karen Sorensen were attending an
evaluation clinic sponsored by the OPD of Hennepin County. The purpose of the
clinic was to .present evaluation tools to the health departments for help in
evaluating the CHS Act which has completed its first year. Mr. Velde reported
that it was an educational experience and would be helpful in the evaluation of
the Act.
IV. Next Meeting Date
The Board set January 24, 1978 at 7:30 P.M. as the next meeting date.
V. Adjournment
Mr. Moss moved for adjournment. Dr. Cardle seconded the motion. All
Voted Aye. Motion Carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Karen Sorensen, Secretary
J�
1801 Y:ESr 50TH SHEET. EGINA. k1iru4ESOTA 15-5424
612.927 -8861
December 2, 1977
Commissioner Richard E.
Board of Hennepin County
...2400 Government Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dear Dick:
Kremer
Commissioners
55487
We do believe that HF 1 and SF 459 if addressed exclusively to the delivery
of social services would be of benefit to the county in its planning,
implementation and delivery of social. services.. The philosophy of the
community health services act is very similar to HF 1 and SF 459. This act
can accomplish the goals of local control over the delivery of social services
in much the same :.:ay that the Community Health Services Act cemented the
role of local control in the determination of community health services.. We
stand firm in our belief that social services must be kept separate from
community health services and. that these two areas can be legislated separately
without detracting from the quality of service of either program.
Presently, we have developed a sophisticated system for the delivery of
community nursing services, home health care, disease prevention and control,
family planning, nutritional services, children's health services, emergency
medical services, health education. and environmental health services. This
system was initiated in the early 1950's and has evolved over the years.
Through the years, the programs have been streamlined and expanded to accommodate
the changing complexion of the local area. With the advent of the Community
Health Services Act, additional funds were used to up -grade the quality of
these programs, namely the Bloomington Public Health Nursing Service. .Also,
in light of the fact that the Minnesota Department of Health is phasing out
of the delivery of health services, the City has entered into a contract with
the Minnesota Department of Health agreeing to provide environmental health.
services.
The key feature of our program is the ability of Edina to determine its own
needs and priorities. We feel that the needs are being,addressed in a very
economical and accountable manner. This belief is reflected by the approval
of our Ccnununity health Services Plan by both Hennepin County and the
Minnesota Department of Health.
With the passage and implementation of IIF 1 aad SF 459 we fear the ability
of the local community to respond to the needs of the community will be
severely jeopardized.
Commissioner Richard E. Kremer
Page Two
December 2, 1977
HF.l:and SF 459 mandate the delivery of certain health and social services.
Not included in the mandated services are emergency medical services, health
education, and environmental health services. Even within the mandated services,
questions will arise as to the priorities for preventative type programs, and
it is conceivable that the urgency of social programs will cause a reduction
in the quality of community health programs because of inadequate funding.
'Through the preventative health programs, dependency on. social service programs .
can be,reduced by avoiding crippling and. disabling diseases. Indeed, through
the early detection of disease, the expeditious delivery of injuries, and
education of good health habits, many serious problems can be avoided.
Another question that.has not been answered is what happens to local programs
such as emergency medical services and environmental health after the passage
of HF 1 and SF 459. Will they be transferred to the. County or will the
municipalities retain the programs? If the municiplities retain the programs,
in effect they will be taxed doubly for eligible programs. If the programs
are transferred to the County, what input will the municipality have in the
determinations of priorities and quality of community health services.. Will
the municipality be required to transfer its funding sources to the county and
hope to receive a reasonable degree of service in return?
Presently, the expenditures for the delivery of community health services in
Hennepin County total $8,867,007. The Community Health Services Act subsidizes
the county with $2,071,191. The remainder of the funding is generated by
local effort. Hennepin County. participates with $1,123,476 and the remaining
$5,672,340 is generated from the participating municipalities. Under HF 1 and
SF 459, the county would receive $28,826,000, of which $14,926,000 would be
Title XX Federal funds.
The remaining $13,900,000 would be used for funding other community health and
social service programs which are not eligible for Title XX funding. To main -
tain the current community health services will cost $8,867,000, leaving
$5,032,993 for the support of the other social service programs which are not
eligible for the Title XX funding. We question whether this $5,012,993 will
be adequate to fund the remaining programs, or will the funding for the
community health services programs be Reduced, and .the,_balance. ransferred to
the social service programs?
We are not convinced that we can relinquish our programs to the county and
justify it economically nor beneficially. If we retain the programs, we are
taxed doubly. If we relinquish the programs we may not benefit with the
delivery of similar services. Either way, the municipalities will «<ost likely
expend more money to maintain the services that we now have, or we will receive
less service for the dollars expended.
Commissioner Richard E. Kremer
Page Three
December .2, 1977
If, on the other hand, the county elects to contract with existing local
programs, how will the needs and priorities of the area be addressed? The
structure and planning for the delivery of community health services will be
determined by the county advisory committee and the county commissioners will .
act on these recommendations. In 11F land SF 459, there are no provisions
for separate advisory boards within the various localities, only the community
health services advisory committee which shall include representation. from
cities within the county. Here, again,. the county will determine our needs
and priorities because of the lack of egitimate local advisory bodies.
We do not oppose.change, but to change a program that is still in its infancy
and doing well does not seem to be.a wise course of action. The programs
which have been implemented are very viable and effective. Instead of repealing
the Community Health Services Act, one should .commend this type of progressive
legislation and hope that it can be applied to other.programs that are
inefficient and unable to contend with local problems on a local basis.
Dick, why does anyone gain by less local control and supervision. This is
now.an excellent program let's work to keep it, not hang it.
Sincerely,
James Van Valkenburg, Mayor
City of Edina
JVV:V:k
cc: Otto Bang
Mary Forsythe
Ray Pleasant
William Dean
Rm. 378, State Office Bldg.
St. Paul, MN. 55155
William Kirchner
129 State Office Bldg.
St. Paul, Mn. 55155
B. Robert Lewis
307 State Office Bldg.
St. Paul, MN. 55155
John Keefe
124 State Office Bldg.
St. Paul, MN. 55155
Analysis of Countywide Revenues and Expenditures (1978)
Community Health Services
Minnesota Dept. of Health Subsidy
Hennepin County $2,018,841
American Indian 52,350
$2,071,191 Total Subsidy
Local Participation
Hennepin County $1,123,476
Bloomington 482,566
Edina 255,275
Minneapolis 4,662,263
Richfield 89,332
St. Louis Park 182,904
$6,7952816 Total Local Participation
$2,071,191 Subsidy
6,795,816 Local Participation
$8,867,007 Total expenditure for
Community Health Services
Estimated Revenues for Hennepin County (1978)
Categorical Programs HF 1
State Aid* $13,174,371 $131,90020001
Title XX 14,552,850 14,926,000
$27,727,221 $28,826,000
Under HF 1 legislation, only the State Aid financing will be eligible for funding
the Community Health Services.
State Aid $13,900,000
1978 CHS Expenditure 8,867,007
$ 5,032,993 available. for other
social service programs
not eligible for
Title XX funding.
*this includes estimated revenues from the Community Health Sbrvices Act
G�`1��111 La
�.�
Metropolitan Area Management Affociation
of the Twin City Area
December 12, 1977
TO:
Mr. Kenneth Boxell,.Mediator
Minnesota Bureau of Mediation
Services
FROM:
Harlyn G. Larson, Chairman .
M.A'.M.A. -320 Negotiating Committee
SUBJECT:
M.A.M.A. POSITION ON IMPASSE
ON BEHALF OF
THE CITIES OF:
Blaine
Edina
New Hope
Brooklyn
Center Fridley
North St. Paul
Brooklyn
Park Hopkins
Robbinsdale
Columbia
Heights Maplewood
Roseville
Coon Rapids Mendota Heights
St. Louis Park
Crystal
Mounds View
White Bear Lake
New Brighton.
On December 2, 1977, Teamsters, Local No. 320 requested that an impasse be
declared with M.A.M.A. (Case No. 78 -PN- 370 -A), and listed issues for
certification.
M.A.M.A. states its concerns as follows:
1. Certain issues not legally bargainable and therefore not subject to
arbitration by Minnesota Statute:
a. M.S. 179.63, Subd. 18 - prohibits bargaining (and therefore) arbitration
with regard to "retirement contributions or benefits."
Thus the Union's listing in its December 2,. 1977 letter of Issue #9
"Insurance continuation for employees retired under a law enforcement
retirement program, and request for arbitration of this issue is
clearly in violation of M.S. 179.63, Subd. 18. M.S. 179.72, Subd. 7
states in part:
"The panel shall have no jurisdiction over nor authority to
entertain any matter or issue not within the definition stated in
section 179.63, subdivision 18...."
b. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 419 and 44 grant to Civil Service
Commissions under these chapters sole control of.employment,
promotions, suspensions and discharge.
James G. Willis, President Casten D- �Leikvold, Secretary
3025 Harbor Lane, Plymouth, MN SS441 -- 14600 Minnetonka. Blvd., Minnetonka, MN 55343
(612) 559 -2800 (612) 933 -2511
Mr. Kenneth Boxell
December 12, 1977
Page Two
Therefore, for those cities covered by these chapters the
contract between the cities and Teamsters, Local No. 320
cannot contain any limitations on Civil Service Commissions'
authority granted by Statute.
M.S. 179.72, Subd. 7,states in part:
"Provided, however, that no decision of.the panel which .
violates any provision of the laws of Minnesota or rules or
regulations promulgated thereunder or municipal charters or
ordinances or resolutions enacted pursuant thereto, or which
causes a penalty to be incurred thereunder,.shall have any
force or effect."
Therefore, for the cities of:
Brooklyn Park
Columbia Heights
Coon Rapids
Fridley
Hopkins
Maplewood
Mounds View
New Brighton
North St. Paul
Roseville
St. Louis Park
White Bear Lake
which are covered by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 419, and for
the cities of New Hope and Crystal, which are covered by
Minnesota Statutes Chapter 44, no contract language can be
continued in any contract which limits Civil Service authority.
c. M.S. 179.66, Subd. 1 states:
"A public employer is not required to meet and negotiate on
matters of inherent managerial policy, which include, but are not
limited to, such areas of discretion or policy as-the functions
and programs of the employer, its overall budget, utilization of
technology, the organizational structure and selection and direction
and number of personnel."
The Union issue listed as #13 in the Union's letter of December 2,
1977 (Maintenance.of Benefits) would require certain benefits
about which a public employer is not required to negotiate to be
part of a contract: This issue is therefore not subject to
arbitration under M.S. 179.66, Subd. 1, nor are the issues of
the definition of a shift, system of wage payment or definitions
of jobs.
r
Mr. Kenneth Boxell
December 12, 1977
Page Three
2. Issues legally bargainable under Minnesota Statutes:
For the cities of:
Blaine
Brooklyn Center
Edina
Mendota Heights
Robbinsdale
the following issues remain with regard to certain articles of the 1976 -77
labor agreement with Teamsters, Local No. 320:
Article 9.3
Article 9.4.
For all cities the following issues remain with regard to certain articles
of the 1976 -77 labor agreement with Teamsters, Local No. 320:
Article 9.5
Article 9.6
Article 10.5
Article 10.6
Article 11
Article 12
Article 18
Article 19
and the issues of
education incentives,
longevity, and
wage differentials.
HGL: hf c
cc: 19 Joint Bargaining Communities
Cy Smythe
Doug Reeder
Tom Vogt
December 12, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Manager, City Council
FROM: Gary Winter, Planning Department
SUBJECT: Status of Revisions to Tax Increment Financing Legislation
By Minnesota Senate
I had the opportunity to attend a meeting of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC)
and Minnesota Chapter of the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment
Officials (NAHRO) Joint Task`Studying Tax. Increment Financing on December 2, 1977,
and a recent Senate subcommittee hearing on December 5, 1977 dealing with revising
the current statutes dealing with tax increment financing. The Senate subcommittee
on Taxation and Finance appears to favor a bill that will greatly limit the
ability of communities to use this redevelopment finance mechanism.
The Task Force is advancing a redevelopment financing bill that would essentially
separate redevelopment through tax increment financing into three elements:
(1) redevelopment; (2) economic development; (3) housing. Each of these elements
would have a set of conditions.associated with it regarding the use of tax
increment financing. An outline of the proposed bill and the administrative
and legal areas that will be affected is attached. This type of bill with .
separate elements for redevelopment, economic development and housing for low -
moderate income families is being sponsored by Senator David Schaff of Fridley.
The Senate Tax and Finance Subcommittee hopes to have a bill drafted and sent to
the Senate when the legislature returns for the 1978 session in January..
In the redevelopment section of the bill, the Senate wants to redefine blight and
blight prevention in the hopes of restricting the use of tax increment financing..
A blighted area would be defined as an area containing structures, 50% of which
are substandard to the point where demolition and clearance is required. Blight
prevention or blighting influence caused by inadequate street layout, incompatible
uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on land, excessive
dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or
conversion, other identified hazards to health and safety and the general well
being of the community could only be undertaken using tax increment financing if
100% of the structures in the area were cleared. This definition of blight
prevention would preclude any project such as the 50th and France Commercial
Redevelopment project. The feeling of some of the senators on the Tax and
Finance Subcommittee was that a. project such as 50th and France should utilize
special assessments and not tax increment financing.
The economic development section applies to vacant land prepared for industrial
expansion. This would primarily affect cities outside the metropolitan area that
annex land for industrial expansion. The economic development section of the
bill would not affect Edina since the City does not plan to use tax increment
financing on any vacant parcels to prepare_ land.for commercial- industrial
development.
y Memorandum
To: City Manager and City Council
Page Two
December 12, 1977
The housing section of the bill will most likely contain the fewest number of
restraints since it is a policy of the legislature and the Metropolitan Council
to provide housing for low- moderate income persons. The Southeast Edina
Redevelopment plan will probably remain unaffected by any new legislation.
GW:ks
Attach.
December 120 1977
PROPOSED REGULATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH
LMC - MINNESOTA NAHRO JOINT
TASK FORCE ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
Definition /Issue Applicable Sections
1. Tax Exemption Redevelopment, Economic Develop-
ment., Housing .
2.. Inflationary Increments
3. E.A.R.C. (school aids)
4. Redevelopment Commitment or
Contracts Required
Administrative Costs
5. Involvement of Other Jurisdictions
Modification of Boundaries
6. Non - Action Provision
Cannot be captured in economic
development projects
No increase in school aids to areas
with economic development projects
Housing and Econ. Development contracts
among Dev. and City Admin. Limited
to 10 %-of project costs
May confer and comment only, within
5 years with public hearings
Must return all tax increments if
project does not commence within
three years of date of project
authorization
.7. Project Length (no. of years 15 years Econ. Dev.
tax increments can be collected) 30 years Redevelopment & Housing
8. Adjusting Base Value ALL
(for tax exempt property later
added to tax rolls)
9. Excess Increments
10. Fiscal Disparities
11. Type of Bond
12. Net Debt Limits
Place in sinking fund for Redev.
& Housing Projects.,,Repay debt
earlier or return to Tax jurisdictions
in Econ. Dev. projects
Housing & Redev. projects exempt,
econ. dev. not exempt.
G.O. Bonds for Redev. and Housing
Incentives to use-Revenue Bonds in
Econ. Dev. Projects
G.O..Bonds sold for housing or
redev. projects not subject to net
debt G.O. bonds for economic
dev. subject to net debt limitations
CITY OF EDINA
TO: MANAGER,-MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: LEGAL FEES - SAC LAWSUIT
Enclosed find copies of memo from James R. Merila, Director of Public
Works, Brooklyn Center.
Because we were not informed of higher cost of the appeal., before it
was incurred, we feel that we should pay one -half of the difference
and ,attorneys should reduce the bill for balance.
We recommend a payment to Brooklyn Center as follows:
Original billing $3598
Adjustment 1208
Recommended payment $2390
Y- Z v 7!(
MEMO TO: Plaintiff Municipalities in S.A.C. Lawsuit
FROM: James R. Merila, P.E., Director of Public Works,
City of Brooklyn Center
DATE: September 14, 1976
SUBJECT: Final Lawsuit Report and Cost Allocation
On December-22, 1975, the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled in favor of
the Metropolitan Sewer Board in the S.A.C. lawsuit.
Enclosed are the following financial documents for billing your
community for its proportionate share of the remaining costs
incurred by the City of Brooklyn Center for the S.A.C. lawsuit.
1) Billing invoice.
2) Summary of legal fees and related .costs for appeal.
3) Monthly detailed itemization of legal fees and related
costs for appeal.
.4) Attorney's memorandum dated July 25, 1974.
The total legal costs paid by the City of Brooklyn Center for the
lawsuit are $51,494.76. $27,146.94 was incurred prior to the appeal
and $24,347.82 was incurred for the appeal.
The appeal costs is approximately $17,000:more than was estimated
at the time we embarked on the appeal. The basic reasons for.the
increase incosts are explained in the attorney's memorandum dated
July 25, 1974.
Allocation of S.A.C. Lawsuit Costs
Or. March 4, 1974, each community received a billing for its pro-
portionate share of.costs paid by the City of Brooklyn Center for
the S.A.C. lawsuit, prior to the appeal, amounting to $27,126.94.
The costs were allocated to the participating municipalities in
accordance with my memo to plaintiff municipalities dated
February..5, 1974.
Table No. 1 shows the allocated amounts and the amounts paid
by the
individual
municipalities.
All municipalities
except Forest
Lake
and
Roseville paid their
respective
allocated amounts. Forest Lake .
limited
their participation
to $100,
while Roseville.limited
their
participation to $833.
Neither community wanted
to continue
with
the
appeal costs. This
leaves an unpaid balance
of $2,466 for
legal fees prior to the
appeal.
TABLE I
INITIAL ALLOCATION OF S.A.C. LAWSUIT
COSTS
(Fees Prior to Appeal -
March 6, 1974)
Municipality
Per Cent
Allocated
Paid
Balance
1.
Brooklyn Center
9.116
$ 2,474.94
$ 2,474.94
-0-
2.
Columbia Heights
3.746
1,017.00
1,017.00
-0-
3.
Edina
12.225
3,319.00
3,319.00
-0-
4.
Forest Lake
.697
189.00
100.00
89.00
5.
Fridley
9.720
2,639.00
2,639.00
-0-
6.
Golden valley
5.451
1,480.00
1,480.00
-0-
7.
Hopkins
7.221
1,960.00
1,960.00
-0-
S.
Maplewood
9.162
2,487.00
2,487.00
-0-
9.
North St. Paul
2.671
725.00
725.00
-0-
10.
Plymouth
8.226
2,233.00
2,233.00
-0-
11.
Robbinsdale
2.162
587.00
587.00
-0-
12.
Roseville
11.824
3,210.00
833.00
2,377.00
13.
St. Anthony
1.660
450.00
450.00
-0-
14.
South St. Paul
9.164
2,488.00
2,488.00
-0-
15.
White Bear Lake
6.955
1,888.00
1,888.00
-0-
100.000
$27,146.94
$24,680.94
2,466.00
-1-
i
On February 7,,1974, a memo was sent to the intervener plaintiffs k
in the S.A.C. lawsuit inviting them to participate in helping
finance the lawsuit. In response to the memo, the City of Brooklyn
Center has received a total of $1,000 from the following municipal -,
ities:
Municipality Amount Paid
Credit River Township $100.
Dellwood $100
Eagan $700
Stillwater Township $100
$1,000
Table No. II shows a. summary of legal fees paid and participating
payments received by the City of Brooklyn Center for the S.A.C.
lawsuit. The summary shows a balance of $25,813.82 for the final
cost allocation, j
E
TABLE NO. II i
r
Summary of Legal Fees and Payments '
Description Amount Balance
Fees Prior to Appeal $27,146.94
Payments Received from
Initial Allocation 24,680.94
Unpaid Balance $ 2,466.00 i
Payments Received from
Interveners 1,000.00 1,466.00
Fees for Appeal 24,347.82
Balance for Final Allocation 250813.82
Final Allocation '
The final allocation of remaining lawsuit costs utilizes the same
formula and data as used for the initial allocation with the
deletion of Forest Lake and Roseville.
Table No. III.shows the derivation of the revised composite ratio
for the formula and the allocation of the remaining S.A.C. lawsuit
costs of $25,814.
If you have any questions. regarding legal points of the lawsuit,
please call Mr. Richard Schieffer at 561 -3200. If you have any
questions regarding the allocation of-the lawsuit costs, please
call Mr. James Merila at 561 -5440.
i
I would like again to take this opportunity.to thank you and your
other community representatives for the fine cooperation that we
have received during the processing of the lawsuit.
-�_( �- 3'x'7_
• � .,.� %Onn •„cam .
.- ,�'►�. �-- -• Tom • =.� ?
{
r4-
1 71
TABLE III
FINAL ALLOCATION OF REMAINING S.A.C. LAWSUIT COSTS
1972
Assessed
Actual
Ratios
(1)
(2)
Valuation
1972
Estimated
Assessed
Population
Est.
Composite
Allocated Previously
Balance To
Municipality
(million) Population
Benefit
Valuation
Benefit
Ratio
Amount
Paid
Be Paid
Brooklyn Center
$91.032
36,371
$85,765
.08501
.11428
.10873
.10419
$ -2.,.69017�-(P$
2,690
-0-
Columbia Heights 55.073
24,079
17,134
.05144
.07566
.02172
.04264
1,101
/!
-0-
$ 1,101
Edina
283.618
45,712
58,800
.26486
.14362
.07455.
.13940
3,598
-0-
3,598
Fridley
95.588
31,500
101,230
.08928
.09897
.12834
.11123
2,872
/�fr'ir
1,000
1,872
Golden.Valley
114.519
24,627
25,305
.10695
.07239
.03208
.06213
1,604
1,604
Hopkins
61.824.
17,000
86,716
.05775
.05342
.10994
.08276
2,136
-0-
2,136
wMaplewood
92.963
27,827
96,708
.08682
.08744
.12260
.10487
2,707
%J`: "7
-0-
2,707
No..St. Paul
21.701
12,371
. 24,819
.02026.
.03888
.03147
..03052
788'x,
70-
788
Plymouth
84.141
22,500
89,710
..07858
.07071
.11374
.09419
2,432
�(.:;',
-0-
2,432
Robbinsdale
44.315
17,061
1,23.0
.04139
.05361
.00156
.02453
633
-i:;'^
-0-
633
St. Anthony
32.650
9,731
50707
.03049
.03060
.00724
.01888
487
3 V.
-0-
487
. So. St. Paul
52.934
25,200
115,000
.04935
.07918
.14580
.10503
2,711
-0-
2,711
White Bear Lake
40.498
24,261
80,636
.03782
.07624
.10223
.07963
2,055/;;
-0-
2,055
$1,070.806
318,340
$788,760
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
1.00000
$ 25,814
$
3,690
$ 22,124
(1). Composite ratio
consists of
1 part assessed
valuation,
1 part
population, and 2 parts estimated
benefit.
'
(2) Allocated amount
rounded to
the nearest
$1 figure.
CITY. OF BROOKLYN CENTER
6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
INVOICE TO TELEPHONE NO. 5613440
Citv Manager Warren Hyde
Ci`tY of Fdi na
4801 West 50th-Street
Edina, Mn 55424
OUR NUMBER -
O
DATE
9/15/76
ISSUING DEPARTMENT
Public Utilities
APPROVED BY
RECEIPT TO
72123400000
TERMS- NET
CITY
OF
uOOKLYN
C E�rTEx
6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA 55430
TELEPHONE (612) 561 -5440
LEGAL FEE'S AND RELATED COSTS PAID BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER. IN
CONULCT�ON WI.H AN A'P AL TO THE MINNTESOTA SUPREME COURT OF THE
DISTRICT CC'..RT R"L.TNG "NF THE LAWSUIT AGAINST THE METROPOLITAN
SEWER BOARD RELATIVE TO "SAC" CHARGES
Paid to Sohikii�._�r, Hadley, Bd,'Ke & Jensen, Law C_" -cep $21,061.53
Paid to N.W. Br. .f Printing Go. 31286.29
Tct-al Appeal Coet (Detail Attached) $24 347.82
I hereby dezh ;ire tinder the penalties of perjury, that the expenses I,sted
ur. th = �rateT�:� .F have been paid by the Litt of Brooklyn Center.
A t {, —19 6
Dad, Paul W. Holmlund
City Trea,; rar
7/re .Scmetlreag Rote earl
FEES PAID TO
SCHIEFFER, HADLEY, BAKKE & JENSEN, LAW OFFICES
JANUARY,
1974
1/4
Research re: appealable orders
$
48.75
. 1/8
Research re: appealable orders; draft
Notice of Filing, Notice of Appeal, Notice
of pattial transcript; corres . re: transcription
of record; Memo to Plaintiff re: status-of
order; corres . with various attorneys re:
service of process
406.25
1/9
Research re: appeal:lbl.e orders
65..00
1 /11
Examinati. :m of Court Fil.e
8.15
1/1.1
Corre :. and service of Notice of Appeal;
Notice of filing, etc.
.65.00
$
593.15
Plus
Copt;; Advanced:
1/16
Photo copies of documents 11.04.
1 /11
Brooklyn Printing,, copies 66.77
1/17
Po stage for Trial Brief 61.74
1/18
Copies of Trial Brief documents 182.68
1/18
Transcript on appeal 102.40
1/24
Filing cf Appeal 20.00
1/31
Misc. exp. on S. B. 13.07
457.70
' Total
Paid, January, 1974 (Pd. ch. #5394,
2- 25 -74) -
$ 1,050.85
FEBR:.'ARY,
1.9 7 4
2/25
Review Appeal procedures
93.75
2/27
Ray.-�w Minnetonka's Brief & Research
printing requirements
9.35
2/28
Research re: Rules of Civil Procedure
112.50
Tctal
Paid, February, 1974 (Pd. ch. #22762,
3- 25 -1-4)
$
215.60
MARCH,
1974
3,x`1
Preparation cf. Appendix
75.00 .
3/3
Ras•�arch and draft Appendix
150.00
3/4
Cf /Lavine, Dever & Froberg re: consolidation
of Appeals; rosearch and drafting of Appendix
112.50
3/4
Cf /Printer and delivery of proofs
75.00
3/5
Research on Appeal
150.00
3/6
Research re: Brief
281,25
3/7
Research re: Appeal
300.25
MARCH,
1974_(ccn4,irr;:ed)
3/7
Re: 3arch re. Appeal (Mr. Carson)
187,50
. 3/8
Re s--3arch r : Appeal
243.75
3/8
R�asearclh Appeal (Mr. Carson)
300.00
3/11
Cf /Mr. Dever, Mr.. Froberg & Research
re: Appeal
243.75
3/12
Rey:: =,w and draft Responsive Motion &
&
aifi.d3vit: ; tc, Motion for Consolidation /Cf/
3/13
1'rina:• .3r & Clerk of S;rpreme Court re: extension
112.50
3/13
Re-- l'earch re: appeal (Mr. Carson)
93.75
3/13
Draft legal & statement of argument-
206.25
3/14
Pr::laratlon and drafting of legal issues.
187.50
3/15
Freptire.st:itci-sent of facia on appeal
300.00
3/16
Res arch & draft argu.,ment
300.00
3/1 5
Research & Draft: i sue can Injunction
300.00
3/22
& Dr«ft Merric, (Mr. Carson)
3`24
300.50
3/2 i
Research re: Appeal
37.50 .
By;
Mr. Sm.
3/11
Rey :,arch re, Motion for consolidation
&
Cf /Mr. Fn: -berg & Mr, Dever;
3/12
168.75
3/1.3
Re_sz:arch re, Ord =er Striking Pleadings
112.50
3/.1.1
Service of Metic:n in Opposition to
Cc-seJ.,'aiyoni and extension,; research re:
order i._c1 pleadings
150.00
Total Paid, March, 197 (Pd. ch. #5514,
4- 22
-74.)
S 4,388.25
APRIL, 197
A
1'rraa�c,., C: Mc- tion9, Notice, Affidavits
a j Cr-der f; ::r i : :er :sicn of Time
56.25
4,/4
R. : :.,r;. r :, : re, Br- ,!f
300.00
4/5
R :arc.;`: r•-�: ccnnection charges
375.00
To :ai 1'a .d, A1'ri1., 1.974 (Pd. ch. #55461
{_
}
$ 731.25
appearance on oral
b -nf-re Cite S, :prem <e Court on.
&
300.00
3,!L 3
!'r F.ara?. : :.•i a -:d -ervi.ce of Notice of appeal
frrlm Crd.-r ci F-ebr -,nary 8, 1974;. Cf /Court
anc.t order Transcript:
56.25
Tct -1 1'32 Ma -.', 1974 (Pd. ch. #562.1
6 -i 0
-7.1 )
$ 356.25
—
-MOW TRAINTSCRIP'TrON COST
COSTS ADVAN(I.�T) i*4,W, Hi'EF: PRINTING CO., TESTI
ch. #;6531, 6-241-74.) $ 1.1443.45
'E, 1
ti�'b PosS, Willis and various other
Doherty 's letter re: costs
1
6, 3 75.00
5 draft Men-Lo re.- costs and
di b r e Cohen, et al
re- 1--iy*:,, nl- of and
C -r/z) r
r---" *"r(.gres,j- c.f appeal 105.00
T�,-ta 19 7,,1 i*--d. ch. #5748,
7-22 280.00
`2
-�-irc'h dtaft c--- Br-,ef - Consolidated
A 375.00-
7/25 and Wait- on Brief - Consolidated
Ap 375.00
p��,
300.00
7/ ILI 6 D r: :,f of ISs :au
7/29 D ra f cif 1. S s ul e S 281.25
Dr- .. - -. -:7 --- - S=-a s.Cf Is Sues 37.50
f S4xi..ement --f 1 -z S e s 225.00
i3 pa-';i, 19f74 II'd. ch. #5798,
7�1
8-12- 1 1" $ 1,593.75
A 1: I", . G !-: ST- 19
ro,
Sew--,.!r Board Brief
300.00
8122
R I i1- rj*
S-w-.�3r Board, Brief
300.00
8",
of Facts
225.00
8/ C,
_;_:3.r-.. r
A - 1
246.25
agencie-,
75.00
811; 1-)
R -, r r
150.00
3
F-,�
cA Facts,
300.00
R rc r-
-I-f Fact!3
0
412.5
8;;
R
r Lev-'.ne, Clerk,
0 3 1' C
71'r r 3 ft-
-- and drarig.
206.25
r
a S4 'C 'Dr.,
cf a rg. i mont
243.75
A
225.00
8, 6
Arc; n:. -,':
206.25
9
r 3
Ar,I-,I-.-,m--:nt
243.75
i r i i
243.75
Pr A ri; .
Atq.;m
318.75
81.?; 2
Vi
318.75
-
81,23
�11.50
S-:•� y
1.1
8/24
Stlidy Transcript
8/25
187.50
8/26
Study Tran,- -cript
412.50
8/27
Study Transcript
150.00
8/28
R:�: earch on Sewer Board Brief
487.50
8/29
Research and Drafting
487.50
8/30
Re,,�arch •ynd Drafting
262.50
8/31
Re:,search and Draffing
_ 375.00
$ 6,490.00
C A d v a r, d-
1/2.1 Ob-air, Care. Copy of Judgment
anti Decr=)a 2.50 2.50
Tc:tsl Pa':1, 1.974 (Pd. ch. #5897,
9- 23 -74) $ 6,492.50
SEPTEMBER. .1974
9/1 Flina., Draft cf Sewer Board Brief 375.00
9/2 Final Draft r.f. Sewer Board Brief 375.00
9/3 Alfhibet.ze Table of Contents 37.50
9/1 Di<i jte �rncf- reading material 375.00
9/5 Dic a =a proof -read ;nn Rr;af 375.00
9/6 Final pry .-of reading and deliver to printer 300.00
Total Paid, Serternber, 1974 (Pd. ch. #5923,
10- 15 -74) $ 1,837.50
NOVEMBER, 1974
11;` i 8 Cf/ Levine re.- Filing of Brief 9.35
Total Paid, .,J,-verr +per, .1974 (Pd. ch. #6066,
12- 9 -7.1) $ 9.35
DECEMBER, 192"
12/2 6 Ci iTC a Ha,,--,-, draft Motion and Stipulatic -n
fcr cr time to file Reply;
Gf;'ccrra_ . C'l_r of S_:,p-=..o Court re;
Fil;: -_a Mo'r'_�:. 18.70
Tc,t.i :i'a i, D ce-�,b �r, 197.1 (Pd. ch. #25590,
i - 1.:{ -75j $ 18.70
'A' :AR,',
t + R �.•:: w R ..; _ -�i:�:_-`:; Brief 93.75
C;:,' M -:!r 14, l j & r �:v:;ew Ro- pondent's Brief 150.00
1; 18 R�vr �w F; iL Brief 56.25
To', 1 P,-v_' A, !.j irv, 19-1"S (N. ch. #k055479,
2- -,! -!S) $ 30000
FEBR??AR :', 1975
i
2/6 Review Scw-,!r Board Brief
56.25
2/7 Pr I arati a of Reply Brief
262.50
2/9 Review Appellant's Brief
187.50
2/10 Research re: Reply Brief
2111
300.00
2;112 Research and draft Reply
150.00
2/13 Prc-uf read and make revisions on Reply Brief
37.50
Total Paid, Febr -.ary, 1975 (Pd. ch. #083479,
3 -24 -754
$ 993.75
MARCH, 19; 5
3/1 .1 .:� and Clerk of. Supreme Ccurt
re' �cr,ir.:i 9.35
3/1 3 Cf/ Dist;. CG.-..Art Clerk re- Exhibits,
pr�!para if_,n of E:{h .bit List; Cf /Cler:K of
5,; reme Cc:+rt and delivery and filing of
Exhib:'�s 93.75
103.10
Adv.i cn 1,
28 c,cpies of R- r.Jy Brief 98.53
Teal Paid, Mar,--h, 19 75 (Pd. ch. #105479,
4- 14 -75) $ 201.63
APR:Lz 1975
4/3 Review Brief and Exhibits and
fer oral argument 337.50
4/5 Pr ,:iratjj- -.: of oral. argument 246.20
4,`:ti . =i d review case law 187.50
4/6 N~ !r . -r31 argument 227.50
4/ I'rer �r_.; *. ;, :3ra appearance on oral
arc; .: _%;t• 150.00
To*: -31 Paid, April, 1975 (Pd. ch. #1.47479,
5 -2 - %, S 1,1.1.8,70
Lc;, I ADD S� I{I _FF ,R, ;iADLa— , BAKKE & ]INS EN
LAW C",F'r';CE.3 5-21,061.53
FEES PAID TO
N,W. BRIFF PRINTING CO.
i'_1d 9- 23 - "4, Br::::_ f,- - 1'l -1 i;:-i.ffs S_3,286.29
.'1
MEMORANDUM
TO: Plaintiff Municipalities in SAC Lawsuit
FROM: R. J. Schieffer, Attorney for Plaintiffs
On June 6, 1974 we wrote you regarding the attempt by the Sewer Board to collect
from your municipality a pro rata share of the attorneys fees incurred by the Sewer
Board in this litigation, As we. noted in that memo, there is no way that the
Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Sewer Board could require Plaintiffs to
pay those costs. The Board and Council agree that these costs cannot legally be
charged to Plaintiffs as is indicated in the accompanying correspondence from
Mayors Cohen and Hilde.
You may recall that we filed our appeal from the tri21 court's original order in
January of 1974. This appeal challenged the court's ruling which stated that the.
SAC method was a legal and enforceable method of collecting sewer costs under the
State Statute. We have felt from the beginning that the Sewer Beard and Council had'
violated this statute in setting up the SAC method. In March of 1974 the trial court
handed down its second decision, holding that the SAC method was a fair and reason-
able method of collecting these. costs and reaffirming its earlier decision that the
SAC method is legal under the statute. Since the attorneys took no action to docket
this judgment, we filed no appeal from that judgment.and continued to work on our
brief on the appeal from the trial court's original order. It was our intention to
appeal only from the trial court's original order since it involved only legal questions
and would not require the. transcribing and printing of all of the testimony taken at
the trial. This method of appeal would save us considerable expense both in terms
of the cost of transcribing the testimony and the lawyer's timq in reading it and
writing a brief on it.
However, in March of 19.74 the Sewer Board attorneys askled us to cooperate in
combining the appeals from both of the trial court's orders. `T'e declined to
cooperate stating that the judgment had not been docketed, t1at the appeal rights
would exist until 90 days after the docketing of the judgment and that there was no
advantage whatever in combining the appeals. The Sewer Board attorneys brought
on a motion before the Supreme Court asking for consolidation of the appeals. Briefs
were filed and arguments heard in May of .1974 with the court ruling on May 14, 1974
that the request for consolidation was premature.
LAW OFFICES
SCRIEI'FER. HADLEY. BAKKE, & JENSEN
610 BROOKDALE TOWERS
ANOKA OFFICE
RICHARD J.SCHIEFFER
CHARLES S. HAOLEY
S71t' AVENUE NORTH AT BROOKOALE CENTER
2115 THIRD AVENUE N.
PAUL J. BAKKE
MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA S5430
ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303
TELEPHONE 612/421 -1737
oAV10 L.JeNSEN.
TERRY C. SMITH
TELEPHONE 612 S61- 3200
JEFFREYA.CARSON
- OF COUNSEL
WILLIAM J. FLEMING
July 25, 1974
MEMORANDUM
TO: Plaintiff Municipalities in SAC Lawsuit
FROM: R. J. Schieffer, Attorney for Plaintiffs
On June 6, 1974 we wrote you regarding the attempt by the Sewer Board to collect
from your municipality a pro rata share of the attorneys fees incurred by the Sewer
Board in this litigation, As we. noted in that memo, there is no way that the
Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Sewer Board could require Plaintiffs to
pay those costs. The Board and Council agree that these costs cannot legally be
charged to Plaintiffs as is indicated in the accompanying correspondence from
Mayors Cohen and Hilde.
You may recall that we filed our appeal from the tri21 court's original order in
January of 1974. This appeal challenged the court's ruling which stated that the.
SAC method was a legal and enforceable method of collecting sewer costs under the
State Statute. We have felt from the beginning that the Sewer Beard and Council had'
violated this statute in setting up the SAC method. In March of 1974 the trial court
handed down its second decision, holding that the SAC method was a fair and reason-
able method of collecting these. costs and reaffirming its earlier decision that the
SAC method is legal under the statute. Since the attorneys took no action to docket
this judgment, we filed no appeal from that judgment.and continued to work on our
brief on the appeal from the trial court's original order. It was our intention to
appeal only from the trial court's original order since it involved only legal questions
and would not require the. transcribing and printing of all of the testimony taken at
the trial. This method of appeal would save us considerable expense both in terms
of the cost of transcribing the testimony and the lawyer's timq in reading it and
writing a brief on it.
However, in March of 19.74 the Sewer Board attorneys askled us to cooperate in
combining the appeals from both of the trial court's orders. `T'e declined to
cooperate stating that the judgment had not been docketed, t1at the appeal rights
would exist until 90 days after the docketing of the judgment and that there was no
advantage whatever in combining the appeals. The Sewer Board attorneys brought
on a motion before the Supreme Court asking for consolidation of the appeals. Briefs
were filed and arguments heard in May of .1974 with the court ruling on May 14, 1974
that the request for consolidation was premature.
Plaintiff Municipalities in SAC Lawsuit
July 25, 1974
Page Two
In the meantime, the judgment has been docketed and appeal rights were set to
expire on June 4, 1974. We had hoped to persuade the court to extend the time
for expiring of appeal rights so that we could argue the appeal on the trial court's
original order and perhaps end the controversy with a single appeal. However,
(as we had realized from the beginning) the Supreme Court really has no power
to extend appeal rights and we were therefore forced to file an appeal from the
trial court's second judgment on May 28th of 1974.
The Supreme Court then did consolidate the two appeals and set up an accelerated
schedule for filing of briefs so that the matter can be heard on final argument in
the early fall of 1974.
Our consolidated brief must be filed on August 23, 1974 and we are therefore
proceeding to re -write the portions thereof which have already been written and
adding to it the issues from the appeal which was consolidated with- the original
appeal. Therefore, we should have a final decision from the Supreme Court in
this matter before the end of 1974.
Sincerely,
SCHIEFFER, HADLEY,. BAKKE & JENSEN
n
Ric6Wieff e�
RJ S :sf
Encl.
MEMO TO: Plaintiff Municipali-ies in SAC Lawsuit
FROM: James R. Merila, Director of P,.blic VTor!,;s
City of Brooklyn Center
DATE: January 30; 1974
SUBJECT REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ASPECTS OF SAC LFWS'JLT
Now that the legal aspects of the S. ?kC lawsuit have been re-
viewed, it is time to'bring all of you up -to -date relative to the
financial status of the lawsuit.
The following items are.attached for your information:
1) an itemized statement of costs that the attorneys have submitted
to the City of Brooklyn Center; 2) a monthly,accumulation of those
costs; and 3) a tabulation of the various communities' participation
commitments through the Joint Powers Agreements.
The estimated cost of the lawsuit through January is
$25,038.00. It is estimated that the appeal costs will be approximate -.
ly $7,000.00 ($5,000.00 for legal fees and $2,000.00.printing costs),
for an estimated grand total of $32,000.00.
The $25,03e.00 for the d.i.st•r.ict lawsuit is approximately
$10;000.00 more than was estimated at the time we embarked on the law-
suit. The basic reasons for the increase in Iecal costs are:
1. The unpredictability of costs for a lawsuit .as complex
as this one.
2. The expansion of the lawsuit by the.Metropolitan Sewer
Board
3. The increase in the number of communities involved.
1. The unpredictability of the lawsuit
The principal issue of the lawsuit was the legal question of
whether the Metropolitan Sewer Board had the authority to charge an(I
collect reserve capacity by a method such as SAC, other than as das -:
cribed in the statute.
It was the consensus of all communities and their represent-
atives, as well as Mr. Joe Summers, the attorney who was retained to
work with Mr. Schieffer but recently was appointed as a Judge in Ramsey
County, that the Metropolitan Sewer Board did not have -that authority.
-2-
As Mr. Richard Sehieffer has described in his memo, one of
the first steps taken was to request a summary judgment from the Judge
relative to the legal issues. However, the Judge rule-3 against us
and declared that the Metropolitan Sewer Board can use any method.they
choose, as long as it is reasonable. At this point, the attorneys
requested the Judge to give a final decision regarding the lawsuit so
that the decision could be appealed to the Supreme Court without the
anticipated lengthy trial on the "reasonableness" factor. The Judge
declared that he would not render a final decision until he had heard
the case relative to reasonableness.
Consequently, nearly two weeks was spent in court hearing the
reasonableness issue. You will notice in the itemized statement that
the costs involved in December and January are approximately $10,900.0
and are primarily the costs involved with the trial. If she Judge
would have ruled in our favor regarding the legal question, there
would have been very little legal fees in December and the lawsuit
expenses would have been in the estimated area of $15,000.00...
It is very similar to having a tiger by the tail -- either
you hang on and fight or you get eaten up. The reasonableness issue
.has been argued and it is felt that that part of the case is strongly
supported for appeal to the Supreme Court.
2. The expansion of the lawsuit
The lawsuit was expanded by the Metropolitan Sewer Board,
as described by Mr. Schieffer's memo.
3. The additional communities involved
Each of the communities that entered into the lawsuit re-
quired specific attention. Originally there were 16 communities.. and
after papers were filed personally to each community, a total of 31
communities were involved as plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
.Brooklyn Center's position
The City of Brooklyn Center has assumed the leadership and
financial responsibility of the lawsuit because the leaders of the
community feel very strongly that the integrity of local government
must be protected.. The threat of total metropolitan government take-
over exists if local government does not fight to.uphold the principle
set forth by the legislature in making the Metropolitan Council a
planning and coordinating agency.
-3-
Each time the Metropolitan Council, Sewer Board, or.repre-
sentatives of the State of Minnesota, such as the Tax Commissioner,
assume more power by their own interpretation of the laws and are not
challenged when they do so, local government loses more control. It is
fortunate that the courts offer a forum when it is necessary to provide
openness and representation of local government to metro and state
affairs. Such is the case of the tax levy limitation lawsuit initiated
by the City of Brooklyn Center a couple of years ago. Even though the
lawsuit was involved with the Tax Commissioner's interpretation.of the
legislative act, it created other beneficial spin -offs; such as it
opened the.doors to the Governor's office.so that a Task Force of muni-
cipal officials was appointed to work with the Governor's chief tax
advisor to modify the law so that local communities could continue to
properly operate by providing service to the residents of their communi-
ty. The lawsuit also put into perspective the Tax Commiss- .oner's inter-
pretation of the laws created by the legislature.
Another example of what lawsuits can do is the case of the
City of Burnsville's lawsuit relative to the Disparity AAct ;�ar;rp.d in
1971. This act was passed primarily as benefit to the core cities and
the outlying communities, much in the same concept and philosophy as
intended by the ShC. It is my understanding hat Burnsville won the
lawsuit on a district level, but it is being appealed to the Supreme
Court in the future.
I heard recently that one of the City Councilmen in a neigh-
boring community feels that their.community should lead the way in a
lawsuit when the occasion arises for upholding the integrity of local
government at their community, because he recognizes the good image
and the goodwill that a community gets by initiating a. lawsuit.
As I have stated
assumed the responsibility
to a final decision in the
before, the City of Brooklyn Center has
of the lawsuit and plans to see it through
Supreme Court if necessary.
At the time the lawsuit was initiated, it was estimated to
cost approximately $15,000.00. The Joint Powers Agreements committed
a total of $12,500.00 from the participants (not including Brooklyn
Center). Recognizing that the present cost is approximately $25,000.00
and appeal costs are estimated to be another $7,000.00, for a total of
approximately $32,000.00,. the City of Brooklyn Center invites the other
participants to expand their participation.
Although the City of Brooklyn Center is determined to see the
lawsuit to conclusion, the City,would prefer to contribute up to
$5,000.00 for its share of the lawsuit. Therefore, the City of Brook-
lyn Center invites the other communities to increase their participa-
tion to at least $27,000.00.
JRM;rc
r
association of
metropolitan
municipal i a ees
BOARD OF DIRECTORS aoc nano,,r t)! r; S
St. paul. minnvsoL, 5 -101 ,6'.2, 2_2-2861 December 5, 1977
Presi den t
Lyall Schwarzkopf
Minneapolis
Vice President
June Demos
TO:
Chief Administrative Official and Designated Delegates.
Roseville
FROM: Lyall Schwarzkopf, AMM President
Past President
Josephine Nunn
Champlin
Richard Asleson
GENERAL MEMBERSHIP MEETING
Apple Va!ley
DATE Thursday, January 5, 1978
Wayne Courthey
Edina
TIME: 8 :00 P.M.
41'alter Dziedzic
PLACE: St. Louis Park Recreation Center
Minneapolis
5005 W. 36th St., (Comm. Room B) .
Maynard Eder
Lake Elmo
A G E N D A
Robert Hansen
1.
Consideration of additional Legislative Policy for the 1978
White Bear Lake
Legislative Session. (these policies have been developed by
David Hozza
the AMM Legislative Study Committees and approved by the Bd.
St. Paul
of Directors) .
Richard Hullander
2.
Other business as may come before the delegation.
Shakopee
Jack Irving
PLEASE NOTE:
Crystal
A.
We request that the administrative official receiving this notice
James hrautkremer
distribute the enclosed copies of the proposed Legislative Policy
Brooklyn Park
to the appropriate city officials.
Myra Lobeck
B.
Excerpt from Article X, Section 1, of By -Laws: "Each community
Oakdale
shall designate a delegate or such alternates as it desires to
Bruce Nawrocki
represent it at all Assn. meetings and so notify the Assn. Execu-
Columbia Heights
tive Director in writing ".
Irving Stern
C.
Article XI, Section 2, of By -Laws, Voting: "The vote on any leg-
St. Louis Park
islative matter shall be by acclamation, but, at any time before
the result of the vote is announced the chairman may, and shall,
Larry Thompson
if requested to do so by five or more delegates present, submit
%Vayzata
the question under consideration to a vote by municipality, in
Mark Vaught
which case each municipality shall be entitled to one vote plus
St. Paul
one additional vote for each 50,000 population or major fraction
thereof of the municipality above the initial 50,000 population,
according to the most recent population estimate of the Metropol-
DuaneZaun
itan Council, except when there is a more recent official census.
Lakeville
Voting by proxy is not permitted, nor may any delegate cast more
than one vote.
Executive Director
Vern Peterson
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Presiden t
Lyall Schwarzkopf
Minneapolis
Vice President
June. Demos
Roseville
Past President
Josephine Nunn
Champlin
Richard Asleson
Apple Valley
Wayne Courtney .
Edina
Walter Dziedzic
Minneapolis
Maynard Eder
Lake Elmo
Robert Hansen
White Bear Lake
David Hozza
St. Paul
Richard Hullander
Shakopee
Jack Irving
Crystal
James Krautkremer
Brooklyn Park
Myra Lobeck
Oakdale
Bruce Nawrocki
Columbia Heights
Irving Stern
St. Louis Park
Larry Thompson
Wayzata
Mark Vaught
St. Paul
Duane Zaun
Lakeville
Executive. Director
Vern Peterson
5M
RE:
association of
VIN
metrop' li.tan
munic0alities
s,. pauf, r.inne:so:a 55101 i612i 22: -2:151
CITY OFFICIALS
ADDITIONAL LEGISLATIVE
POLICY FOR 1978.
,FROM: VERN PETERSON
EXEC. DIRECTOR
DATE:, Dec. 5, 1977
In October of 1976 the Association of Metropolitan Munici-
palities adopted its legislative policy program for the
1977 -78 legislative biennium. . Said policy and program
basically will continue in force and effect through the
1978 legislative session. However, several issues have
arisen since that point in time which might be dealt with
during the 1978-session for which the Association.does not
have applicable policy. Consequently, the AMM.'s stand-
ing legislative policy committees have examined several
of these issues and concerns and have proposed several ad-
ditional legislative policies for consideration and adop-
tion by the membership. These proposed policies were
approved by the Board of Directors on.December 1, 1977.
The attached policies, then, are intended to supplement
the 1977 -78 legislative policy program and are not in-
tended to be a repl- acement for the existing policy, except
as- specifically noted on the attached pages.
The proposed policies will be considered at the General
Membership Meeting on January 5, 1978, in St. Louis Park.
PROPOSED.DRAFT POLICY
PART ONE
MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXES
I-B -4 SPECIAL LEVY FOR MANDATED STATE AND FEDERAL PROGRAMS.
The cost of local government is being influenced more and more
by both state and federally.iegislated mandated programs and -
increased mandated benefits or costs for in -place programs.
Due to current levy limitation restrictions, the ability of
local government to pay these increased costs is severely. re-
stricted thereby causing,, in many.instar.ces, . a reduction in
the .level of the typical service.functions of police, fire,
street, etc. There is a vast range cf mandated :pr.o.gram=in-
creases which have no bearing or relationship to the annually
allowed 6% levy. limit increase. Some of these include work-
menus compensation benefits, binding arbitration, federal
Social Security, minimum wage laws, comprehensive planning,
.Critical Areas Act, Shorelines Act, OSHA, etc.
THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES URGES THE
LEGISLATURE TO (1) RELNSTATE THE SPECIAL LEVY FOR NEW AND
INCREASED PROGRAM COSTS MANDATED'BY STATE LAW, (2) INITIATE
A SPECIAL LEVY FOR INCREASED COSTS CAUSED BY OTHER STATE
ACTION, AND (3) INITIATE A SPECIAL,LEVY FOR FEDERAL MAN-
DATED PROGRAMS.
REPLACES POLICY PART ONE, I -B -4 AND I-B -5
-1-•
Proposed Draft Policy
PART ONE
MUNICIPAL REVENUES AND TAXES
I -B -5 SPECIAL LEVY - NATURAL DISASTER AND LAWFUL ORDER.
The 1977 Legislature eliminated a number of special levies,
including those for expenditures of funds as a result of
Natural Disasters and Lawful Orders, neither of which a
city can plan for or has any control over. Lawful Orders
are a result of not being able to implement some state or
federal regulation. Natural disasters, such as the August,
1977.seven inch rainfall in the metropolitan area, can cause
unnatural large expenditures for emergency repair to city
facilities. Neither of these are used often, but when
needed are absolutely.necessary. Therefore,
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO REINSTATE THE SPECIAL LEVIES
FOR LAWFUL ORDERS AND NATURAL DISASTERS.
—2—
Proposed Draft Policy
PART ONE
MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES AND TAXES
E. GENERAL FISCAL IMPACT,
1. MINNESOTA CITY ECONOMIC, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL.CONDITION STUDY.
.Each biennium the Legislature passes a number of laws con -
concerning levy limits, municipal state aids, property taxes,
and other factors related to the fiscal relationship of the
various municipalities. However, because of the extreme
variety of municiplai.ties in Minnesota as to. size, age,
demographics, services offered, levels of service, methods
of paying for various activities, etc., these laws and the
resulting implied state policy have a drastically different
impact, both economic and social, on the various cities de-
pendent upon those cities existing characteristics. It
seems logical that to develop effective and responsible
policy and law concerning cities, their characteristics and
varying conditions should be well known and documented for
the lawmakers. Therefore, in the same manner that the
Legislature initiated an in -depth objective analysis of
the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul by the State Planning
Agency,
THE AMM REQUESTS THAT THE STATE/LOCAL FISCAL STUDY CURRENTLY
BEING CARRIED OUT BY THE STATE PLANNING AGENCY PROVIDE A DE-
TAILED ASSESSMENT OF THE ECONOMIC, PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL CON-
DITIONS OF ALL MINNESOTA CITIES SO THAT EFFECTIVE AND
REALISTIC LEGISLATION AND POLICIES CONCERNING THOSE CITIES
MAY BE DEVELOPED IF THE PRESENT STAFFING, FUNDING, AND
TIME CONSTRAINTS PREVENT THE COMPLETION OF SUCH A REPORT,
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD EXTEND AND EXPAND THIS STUDY SO THAT
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS CAN BE CARRIED OUT. IN ADDITION,
THE AMM REQUESTS THAT THE STATE PLANNING AGENCY ESTABLISH.
-3-
AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR THIS STUDY COMPOSED OF LOCAL
OFFICIALS.
The Study should not have to include a detailed analysis
of all 865 Minnesota cities, bu,t could include a sample,
number from each general category,, (i.e., older developed
suburb, developing suburb, metropolitan rural, metropolitan
free- standing, state older city,.state rural city, state
newer city, etc.).
2 FISCAL NOTES.
Many laws are passed each year by the Legislature which have
a substantial effect on the financial viability of cities.
Some of these, such as revenue and tax measures, have an ob-
vious and direct effect which is often calculated and re-
ported during the hearing process. However, many others,
such as workmen's compensation benefit increases, unemploy-
ment compensation changes, minimum wage increases, mandated
activities, binding arbitration and other labor related leg-
islation, social programs,.etc., are not viewed during the
bill.process as to the fiscal i-mpa-ct on cities. Due-to the
current restrictive levy limitation laws many of these
hidden costs are causing severe reductions in the standard
services which must be provided by local units.
THE AMM CONSIDERS IT IMPERATIVE THAT THE LEGISLATURE INCLUDE
IN ALL PROPOSED LEGISLATION A FISCAL NOTE DETAILING THE
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED BILL ON ALL LOCAL
UNITS OF GOVERNMENT.
3. UNIFORM ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING
The State Planning Agency has been authorized in the past
several -years to conduct studies of "'local government
-4-
`Proposed Draft Policy
fiscal problems, debts and fiscal. management ". They found
that because of the variety o.f accounti.n,g systems and lack
of a good required uniform ;r.eportng me.,thod, much .of t -he
necessary data was diff cal`t .o obt_ ir., Since the, s'ta:te
is involved to a great degree in financing focal govern-
ment and creating local governing policy, there is a need
to be able to evaluate uniform financial data. Current re-
porting methods.are so diverse that. analysis by public and
private agencies and groups is difficult. No single state
agency has responsibility for understanding a city's fiscal
condition which must be protected for it to enter the cap-
ital market. Based on this data, the State Planning Agen-
cy has recommended that the Le.gisIature_ adopt uniform
standards of accounting and reporting for cities.
The AMM supports the following recommendation:
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD REQUIRE UNIFORM FINANCIAL REPORTING,
HOWEVER, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT PROMOTE A UNIFORM AC-
COUNTING SYSTEM BUT SHOULD PROMOTE THE USE OF GENERALLY
ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES.
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD AUTHORIZE A STATE AGENCY SUCH AS THE
STATE PLANNING AGENCY, IN COOPERATION WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS,
TO CONDUCT ANALYSIS OF UNIFORM FINANCIAL DATA, PUBLISH THE
STUDIES AND FINDINGS AWD_- .RE:COMMEND. N.ErEDED ACTIONS OR POLI-
CIES-OR APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION..
THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROVIDE ADEQUATE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
FUNDING FOR CITIES TO ACCOMPLISH CONVERSION TO GENERALLY
ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING.PROCE.DURES AND UNIFORM REPORTING, IF
FUNDING IS NOT SUPPLIED BY THE STATE., THE AMM STRONGLY OB-
JECTS TO ANY CHANGES.IN THE CURRENT STATUS,
-5
-Proposed- Draft Policy
(addendum)
PART TWO
GENERAL LEGISLATION
VII.
SHADE TREE DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM
VII -D GENERAL SHADE TREE CONTROL PROGRAM
Various program changes, some major, have occurred an-
nually since 1973. This has created problems .for 10-
cal units trying to establish continuing programs in
keeping up with the changing rules for successful im-
plementation. The current program has been in exis-
tence less than one year, and it is too early to make
valid definitive judgments as to its success or failure.
With very few exceptions across the state., the program
is working, is controllable, and administratively res-
ponsible and accountable. Most problems that have
surfaced are of a technical or interpretive nature.
Therefore:
THE ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES SUGGESTS
THAT NO MAJOR CHANGE IN PHILOSOPHY, ADMINISTRATION, OR
DIRECTION OF THE SHADE TREE DISEASE 'CONTROL PROGRAM BE
LEGISLATED UNTIL DEFINITIVE RESULTS OF THE CURRENT PRO-
GRAM-ARE AVAILABLE AND.THAT MINOR OR TECHNICAL PROBLEMS
BE RESOLVED THROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE RULES.
VII -E SHADE TREE PROGRAM FUNDING.
The magnitude of the dying t're.e problem is much greater
-. 6 -
than even the experts predicted in �_Y_ 1977. There
was not enough grant money avail,a,bl,e in.197.7 to pro-
vide 45% match in the.metropolitan area, and expec.ta-
tions are that in 1978 the percen -tage will drop from
the current 37% level.. In many..l,ocalities reforesta-
tion is becoming an even greater problem than sanita-
tion and the $4 million grant fund.is not going to be
sufficient.
THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO 'INCREASE THE SHADE
TREE GRANT APPROPRIATION FOR 1978 SIGNIFICANTLY, ES-
PECIALLY FOR REFORESTATION.
VII -F EXEMPTION FROM LEVY LIMITATION.
To be successful, the local shade.tree disease control.
programs must extend beyond calendar year 1978. Cur -.
rent legislation extends levy limit exemption for local
expenditures only through calendar year 1978. If the
levy limit exemption is not extended at least through
calendar.year 1979 for local government, a great amount
of anxiety and uncertainty in local budgeting for 1979 "
will occur as it did in 1976 for 1977 expenditures. This
may result in drastic reductions in local programs be-
cause. many.of the municipalities involved.canno,t absorb
that cost in their general levy without severe cutting
in the standard service areas of police, fire or roads-
TO ENSURE AN ADEQUATE CONTINUATION OF THE SHADE TREE
DISEASE CONTROL PROGRAM, THE 1978 LEGISLATURE MUST EX-
TEND THE LOCAL LEVY LIMIT EXEMPT.ION.THROUGH AT LEAST 1979.
-7-
Proposed Draft -Policy
VIII TREE REMOVAL.AND.TREATMENT LICENSING
The high incidence of Dutch Elm and Oak Wilt diseases has under-
standably caused a large increase-in the activity and numbers
of firms in the tree removal and treatment service business.
Several proposals have been made to- initiate metropolitan or
statewide licensing and setting.of standards.. The Association
does concur that some form of consumer and worker protection,
as - -well as control of chemical treatment activities, would be'
advisable However, we would oppose mandatory licensing on state
or metropolitan level. Licensing of contractors and .various
activities has long been a local. prerogative and the mechanism
for license review, issuance and enforcement is already in place.
The primary reason that local licensingg has been successful and,
therefore, maintained at the local level is that inspection and
enforcement personnel reside at the local level and are much
more familiar with the area and activities, thus providing bet-
ter and.faster enforcement. Most local units currently have a
tree inspector and some form of.controllremoval program. It
then logically follows that licensing could most economically
and efficiently be initiated and enforced at this level.
THE ASSOCIATION URGES MUNICIPALITIES TO ADOPT TREE REMOVAL AND
TREATMENT LICENSING PROCEDURES FOR THE. PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
OWNERS, THE GENERAL PUBLIC AND.,EMFLOYEES OF FIRMS ENGAGED IN THAT
SERVICE. TO.THAT END, THE ASSOCIATION HAS DEVELOPED AND WILL
MAKE AVAILABLE TO INTERESTED MUNICIPALITIES A MODEL ORDINANCE
SETTING STANDARDS AND REGULATING THE ACTIVITIES OF TREE REMOVAL
AND TREATMENT FIRMS.
THE ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS TREE REMOVAL AND TREATMENT LICENSING
AT THE PREROGATIVE.OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT, BUT DOES OPPOSE INITIATION
OF MANDATORY LICENSING AND /OR LICENSING AT THE STATE OR METROPOL-
ITAN LEVEL. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STATE ESTABLISH UNIFORM MINIMUM
STANDARDS FOR SHADE TREE TREATMENT CONTRACTORS AND BUSINESSES.
-8-
Proposed Draft Policy
IX. 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SERVICE FINANCING
The 1977 . Legislature passed a "mandatory law r:equirin:g:t'he im-
plementation of basic 911 emergency telephone service in the
Twin City metropolitan area by :1982 and the remainder :o.f ,t -he
state by 1986.. This law also created a commission of two sen-
ators, two representatives and three private citizens appointed
by the Governor to study long range permanent financing alter -
natives for initial capital equipment and recurring trunk net-
work facility costs. The approximate estimated -cost for 911
service statewide by 1987 is $4 million for telephone central.
office conversion and an annual recurring trunk network cost
of,.$3.5 million. Due to the complexity of geographic and'po-
Iitical boundaries, the limited financing capability of local
governments and the degree of benefit to all persons in the
state, both residents and visitors, it is extremely difficult
to allocate a fair share of the costs to each public safety
answering point or local jurisdiction.
The AMM urges consideration .of the following financial alter-
natives
A. THE RECURRING COSTS FOR TELEPHONE NETWORK TRUNK FACILI-
TIES AND EQUIPMENT TO PROVIDE BASIC 911 SERVICE STATE -
WIDE BE PAID FOR BY STATE COLLECTED TAX FUNDS.
B. THE STATE CONSIDER A PORTION OF THE INCREASING RECEIPTS
FROM THE TELEPHONE COMPANY GROSS EARNINGS TAX AS A
SOURCE OF REVENUE THAT COULD BE. DEDICATED TO PAY FOR
THE "RECURRING BASIC 911 SERVICE SYSTEM COSTS.
C. THE STATE CONSIDER TELEPHONE COMPANY CENTRAL OFFICE CON-
VERSION COSTS FOR 911 SYSTEM NEEDS IN THE SAME MANNER AS
RECURRING COSTS AND PROVIDE THE SAME TYPE OF FUNDING,
P= roposed Draft Policy '
D. LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY ANSWERING POINT RECURRING COST FOR
LINE AND TERMINATION EQUIPMENT BE,.'F.UN.DED LOCALLY. ANY
SERVICE GREATER THAN THE BASIC 91.1 SERVICE A'S :DEFINED BY
LAW BE FUNDED LOCALLY.
E. ALL LOCALLY FUNDED COSTS, INCLUDING IMPLEMENTATION AND
RECURRING FOR 911 SERVICE WHICH EXCEEDS CURRENT EMERGENCY
TELEPHONE SERVICE COSTS, BE CONSIDERED A "SPECIAL LEVY"
AND BE EXEMPTED FROM THE GENERAL LEVY LIMITATION.
NEW POLICY
III.
II -D ADMINISTRATIVE CONDUCT OF METROPOLITAN AGENCIES AND COM-
MISSIONS,
The State Legislature in 1967 created the Metropolitan Council
for the purpose of coordinating the orderly growth and economic
development in the metropolitan area. Subsequent actions by
the Legislature have strengthened the role of the Council in
carrying out its .intended functions, Additionally, several.
metropo.li.tan commissions and agencies have been created to as-
sist the Council in its work and to provide the structure neces-
sary to implement, on a regional basis, certain operational sys-
tems such as transit, wastewater disposal, airports, etc. The
Council has also been given certain approval authority over
some key aspects of the activities of general purpose units of
local government in order to protect the.integrity of metropol-
itan physical systems. As the designated agency for conducting
the Federal A -95 review procedure,, the `Council also can exert
a great deal of influence on the actions of local units of gov-
ernment. In effect, by action of the state and federal
-16- ..
.governments during the past decade, a form of general purpose
regional government now exists in the seven - county metropoli-
tan area. While it is true that the Metzopoli-tan .Council and
its Commisisons and Agencies cannot expand their roles and au
thorities in a specific sense, except 'thr:ough legislative au-
thorization, the past legislative.,- `enabling legislation has
tended to be very general in nature, thereby giving the:se.units
much discretion in interpretation. Except in isolated case s
such as implementation.of the Land Use Planning Act and the
procedure for implementing the.Metropolitan Significance Rules,
the Legislature has given almost complete administrative free-
dom to the metropolitan entities in the conduct of their ac-
tivities. In contrast, the.Legislature has prescribed, by
law, a uniform procedure for state administrative agencies and
departments which must also interpret and implement state.law
that is often general in nature and scope. The Administra-
tive Procedures Act (APA),.Chap.ter 15, of the State Statutes,
was developed specifically to regulate the rule- making functions
of state agencies and to assure uniformity and impartiality of
process, thereby protecting the public's right.
A bill was introduced in the 1977 Legislative.Se.ssion which
would have extended the provisions of the APA to encompass the
Metropolitan Council and other metropolitan agencies and com-
missions. The bill did not become law primarily because it was
recognized during the hearings and discussion that:
1. The 'APA was designed specifically for state agencies and
does not lend itself very well to much of the activity
conducted by regional agencies.
2. If the APA were to be imposed` as is, some of the policy
making authority would be transferred`` -from the regional
agencies to the independent hearing examiner.
3. The relationship between the metropolitan agencies and
the units of local government might become more adversarial
-11-
in.nature.
THE ASSOCIATION BELIEVES THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR A UNIFORM AND
CONSISTENT PROCESS TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE METROPOLITAN AGENCIES
IN THEIR DEALINGS WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNITS AND THE GENERAL
PUBLIC. WHILE THERE IS :A NEED FOR UNIFORMITY, CONSISTENCY,
AND.FAIRNESS, THE ACTIVITIES OF THE METROPOLITAN AGENCIES WHICH
IMPACT ON THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL UNITS ARE OF SUCH A DIVERSE
NATURE THAT APPLYING THE PROVISIONS OF THE STATE APA TO THIS
PROCESS MIGHT CREATE MORE PROBLEMS THAN CURRENTLY EXIST FROM
A PROCESS STANDPOINT. CONSEQUENTLY, THE ASSOCIATION DOES NOT
SUPPORT EXTENDING THE PROVISIONS.OF THE STATE APA TO INCLUDE
THE ACTIVITIES OF THE METROPOLITAN AGENCIES ON A CARTE BLANCHE
BASIS.
ALTERNATIVELY, THE ASSOCIATION RECOMMENDS THAT.-
THE LEGISLATURE DIRECT THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CHAIRMAN TO
APPOINT A SPECIAL COMMISSION TO DEVELOP UNIFORM AND ADMINISTRA-
TIVE PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND
METROPOLITAN AGENCIES- WHICH-WOULD APPLY TO THOSE AGENCY ACTIV-
ITIES WHICH BECOME A PART OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC POLICY OF AN
AGENCY. THE COMMISSION SHOULD INCLUDE REPRESENTATIVES.FROM THE
LEGISLATURE AND COUNCIL, CITIES, COUNTIES AND GENERAL PUBLIC AND
METROPOLITAN COMMISSIONS, NOT TO'EXCEED 15 PEOPLE. SUCH PRO-
CEDURES SHOULD INCLUDE A SPECIFIC PROCESS FOR THE ADOPTION OF
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROCEDURES.
-I2-
December 19, 1977
To: Kenneth E..Rosland, City Manager
From: Robert C. Dunn, Director of Public Works and City Engineer.
Subject: Contour -Maps of City
Mark Hurd Proposal
Mapping done for the Department of Natural Resources in connection with a wet
land identification program and for Barr Engineering Company in connection
with a. restudy of flood hazard for the Federal Flood Insurance. I program were
brought up at the last council meeting.as possible- ,duplication.'of work to be
done under subject proposal
The Department of Natural Resources work was infra -red photography for identifi-
cation purposes only and did not identify. contours.
The work for Barr Engineering Company was 2' contour interval topography at
1" = 500' scale in a very limited area along Nine Mile Creek. Our maps are also
done at 2' contour interval but are at l" = 200' scale so the two systems.are not
compatible and would be very difficult to use together.
In view of the above, I recommend that the Mark Hurd proposal be approved and
they be.ordered to proceed with the project.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert C. Dunn, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO:
Mayor and
City
Council
FROM:
Robert C.
Dunn,
Director of Public Works & City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1j000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
Two 10 foot underbody blades
Quotations /Bids:
Company
McHullen Company.
2. Chas. Olson & Sons.
3.
Recommendation:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 3,340.00
3,356.00
Purchase from 1 ;01u len C' 1 fF quotation
IK ��✓ Public Works /Engineering
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not F--j within the amoun budgeted for the purchase.
J. N. �Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
!/ 1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
kenneth R Bland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Buresh
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
28 Portable Radio Pager /Monitors and 1 Ecoder
Hennepin County Cooperative Bid
Quotations /Bids:
Company
i. Motorola Comms. & Electronics
2.
3.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$251.00 x 28 = $7,028
475 x 1 475
7,503
i �• 1 �
Recommendation: In accordance witounty Bid, recommend purchase of items
f otor a Comm m► is g ons an Electronics.
'. Public Safety
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not r--j within the amou t ud ted for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGE 'S ENDORSEMENT
1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Dunn
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
4 Wheel Drive Articulated Loader
City Bids
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
Base Less Trade In Plus Option Total
1. J.I. Case 37,624.00 6,000.00 500 32,124.00
2. Valley Eq. 52,177.00 16,942.00 Std 35,235.00
(John Deere)
3- Minnesota Tractor •56,263.00 16,941.00 Std 39,322.00
(Fiat- Allis)
4. Ziegler 53,299.00 13,359.00 1135 41,075.00
Recommendation: Request to be continued for further study.
-e-z- � /C:-. Public Works /Eng.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not Q within the amount budgeted for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S E10ORSEMENT
1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
/ Council approve the purchase.
!/ 2. I recommend as an alternative: -- 70,9
Kenneth Ro6lan
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Dunn
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
Pickup Sweeper - Self propelled
Quotations /Bids:
Company
Base
1. Mac Queen Eq: Co. $39,383.00
(Elgin)
2.
3•
Amount of Quote or Bid
Less Tra a In Tota
$5,557.00 $33,826
Recommendation: Having determined sole bidder to be responsible, recommend award
of bid riacQueen Eq. Co.7
Public Works /Eng.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is 5;�j is not Q within the amount Igeted for the purchase.
j/J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
�1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Dunn
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
Sewer Rodder - Truck mtd.
Quotations /Bids:
Company
Base
j. Flexible Pipe'Tool. $17,995.00
x.
3.
Amount of Quote or Bid
Less Trade In Total
$2,395.00 $15,600.00
Recommendation: Having determined sole bidder to be responsible, recommend award
of bid ttoFlexible Pipp Tool.
Public Works /Eng.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not Q within the amount budgeted for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGE 'S ENDORSEMENT
1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor and City Council
Robert Dunn
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
10,000 GVW 4 Wheel Drive Truck
City Bid
Quotations /Bids:
Company
j; Midway Ford. .
North Star Dodge
3.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$9,704.00
10,627.00.
Recommendation: The vehicle submitted for bid by Midway does not meet specifications
(8400 G)a� vice 10,000 GVW -and therefore recommend award to North Star Dodge.
r_41 �� Public Works /Eng.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement -
The recommended bid is 5;iT is not within the amoun bud eted for the purchase.
N. Dalen
inance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
Z1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
1
KenneihlRosland
City Manager �.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
1/2 ton Pickup - Park Crew
City Bids
Quotations /Bids:
Com an
1; Freeway Ford
2. North Star Dodge
3- Superior Ford
4. Midway Ford
Amount of Quote or Bid
$4,607.00
4,685.35
4,718.34
4,754.10
Recommendation: Having determined that the low bidder is responsible, recommend
acceptance of t -bid, from -Free 'y Ford.
Park .
Signavdr Department
Finance Director's Endorsement /
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budgeted for the purchase.
A N. Dalen
nance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
tll�1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
i
Kenn'6th Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE.: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
3/4 ton Cargo Van - Park Crew
City Bids
Quotations /Bids:
Company
j. Freeway Ford .
2 Superior Ford
3� Midway Ford
Amount of Quote or Bid
$5,400.00
5,416.00
5,848.00
Recommendation: Having determined that low bidde is responsible, recommend
award 'd to�`�e ay rd.
Signat re. Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not Q within the amount d ed for the purchase.
t
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
�. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE U
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
3-Compact Squad Cars - 360 cu in V -8 4dr Volare
Bid through Hennepin-County Cooperative Purchase
Bloomington Chrysler - Plymouth awarded Volare bid.
Quotations /Bids: '
Company Amount of,Quote or Bid
Bloomington Chrysler- Plymouth Volare $5,063.65 x 3 = $15,190.95
2.
3, '
Recommendation: In accordance with the County Bid recommend purchase of
3 veh' es from Bloo ington Chrysler- Plymouthj,�
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not Q within the am o ud eted for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
(/ 1. I hereby .concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth R sland
City Manager
REQUEST-:FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Craig Swanson, Chief of Police
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
3-Compact Sauad Cars - 350 cu in V -8 4dr Novas
Bid through Hennepin County Cooperative Purchase
Suburban awarded Nova bid
Quotations /Bids:
Company
j. Suburban Chevrolet Nova
2.
3•
Amount of Quote or Bid
$5,312.49 x 3 = $15,937.47
Recommendation: In accordance with the County Bid, recommend purchase of
3 vehi s from S burba Chevrolet.
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement.
The recommended bid is is not within the amour b et d for the.purchase.
•
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
/ 1. I hereby concur with the recommendation "of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor and City Council
Robert Kojetin
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
December 14 , 1977
Material Description (General Specifi- cations):
1'Compact 2 dr Sedan
City bids
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1: Bloomington Chrysler - Plymouth Volare
2. North Star Dodge - Aspen
3. Freeway Ford - Fairmont
4. Superior Ford - Fairmont
Amount-of-Quote or Bid
$4,410.28
4,474.11
4,525.00
4,578.30
Recommendation: Having determined that low bidder 's respons e,.recommend award
of bi oom' to C ler- outh.
Signatu a Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is is not within the amount bud eted for the purchase.
. J. .N..Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Robert Dunn..
VIA: Kenneth Rosland,.City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: December 14, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
3/4 ton Van /5 Passenger - Survey Crew
City Bids
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�. Freeway Ford
2. Superior Ford
3 Midway Ford
Amount of Quote or Bid
$6,109.00
6,243.00
6,503.00
_Recommendation: Having determined that low bidder is responsible, recommend
award bid too Freeway -Ford.
%� i
% Public Wnrka /Fns,
Signature Department
Finance Director's Endorsement
The recommended bid is � is not Q within the amo n LtedZfor the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
—Z 1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth hosland
City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
T0: Mayor and City Council
FROM: FINANCE DIRECTOR
-VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE,OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE: 12 -14 -77 -
Material Description (General Specifications):
SIGN LIQUOR STORE - 50th STREET
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. NORDQUIST SIGN $1570.00
(Steve-Hertz)
2. LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC. $1200.00
(Mark McCline
....3.
Recommendation:
LOW BID - LAWRENCE SIGNS, INC.
J. N. DALEN FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Signature Department
MANAGER'S ENDORSEMENT
1. 1 hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and
recommend the Council to approve the purchase.
2. 1 would recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
-------- dlllll= X11111 = - - -- - - - - -- - O an Ce W"s
FABRICATORS -
DESIGNERS 416 EAST HENNEPIN AVENUE s (612)378 -0089 • MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55414
December 6, 1977
Mr. Dahlin
Edina City Offices.
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Dahlin:
We are pleased to present to you a quotation for a sign at the new Edina
Liquor Store at 3939 West 50th Street. The sign will be 33t° high and
211 -8 l /2II long, painted metal can with three (3) rows of fluorescent
lamps. Faces will be flat formed Lexan with copy painted on reverse
side. Copy to read as per Sketch #77 -R -499.
Price, $1200.00 plus permits and wiring
Yours truly,
LA WRE SIGN8, C
ark McCline
MM:ds
0-K
MEMORANDUM
December 16, 1977
To: City Manager, Mayor and Council.
From: Mark Bernhardson; Administrative Assistant
Subject: 1978 Youth Action Contract
Attached is a draft of the proposed Youth Action Contract for 1978.
The proposed "changes incorporated in the draft include:
1) Page 1 Paragraph 3 - deletion of the words "free of charge
to those making use of such services ".
The change is proposed so that Youth Action would be able to
institute a policy of charging for its family counciling
service on an ability to pay basis.
2) Page 2 Paragraph 2B(1) - The principal focus of Youth Action's
outreach efforts are in the school system.with less intense
efforts in the places mentioned in the 1977 contract -
(i.e. "bowling alleys, shopping centers, and drop -in centers, etc. ")
3) Page 4 Paragraph 3B -
a. Change the monthly.amount payable from $1,125.00 to
$1,333.33. ($16,000 annually)
b. Change in the billing method. In 1977 Youth Action had
to submit a monthly report by the 15th of the month to be
reimbursed for the previous month, and the City was to pay
within.10 days of receipt. Because of.problems with this
arrangement, the change allows':thein °�.to`-.submit:'a monthly
bill immediately at the end of the month but still requires
a-.monthly report prior to payment for the succeeding month.
(i.e. March's report must be in hand before we pay April's
bill.)
MB:md
AGREZ Tt'. 7
THIS AGREEI•IM,.made and entered into this day of ,
1978, by and between the CITY Or EDINA, a municipal corporation under the laws
of the State of I;innesota (hereinafter.called "City "), and STCREFRONT/YOUTH ACTION
INCORPOIRATED, a Rinneapolis non — profit corporation, (hereinafter called "Storefront /.
Youth Action ");
WITPIESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, City believes that it will serve to promote and enhance the
general welfare of the residents of the City of Edina and to decrease crime and
vice irithin the City if youth and family counseling services are available to
such residents;-and.
WHEREAS, Storefront/Youth Action is an Edina/Richfield based organi-
zation, the primary purpose of which is to direct, assist, and give guidance to
youth and their parents and to treat the social and emotional problems of youth;
and,
WHEREAS, City desires, and is authorized by 11innesota Statutes,
Sections 412.211 and 412.221, to contract.for the acquisition of services .such
as those provided by Storefront /Youth Action which are designed to promote the
general welfare of the residents of the City and to decrease crime and vice
therein, and which will help effectuate the ordinances of the City, and the
poorer of the City, Council, relating to the health, :safety and general welfare
of the residents of the City
NOI1, THE..i,FOPE, City and Storefront /Youth Action hereby agrees as
f ollows :
1. Term. This agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 1978,
and shall expire on December 31, 1978, both dates inclusive, unless sooner term-
inated by City,as provided in paragraph 6 hereof.
2. Responsibilities of Storefront/Youth Action.. Storef ront/Youth
Action hereby. agrees to provide the City with a well— trained and .ualified staff and
to perform the following services for the City:
A. To at all times provide direct, immediate, confidential and
professional counseling to any Ei 'na youth and /or family upon
request.
B. To provide outreach services to Edina youth and/or their
families, which will include but not.be limited to the following:
(1) Establishing and maintaining a presence and availability
to Edina.youth at the times primarily through the schools
and in the various locations throughout the City which
are frequented by youth in order to provide an accessible.
counseling resource to Edina youth in their own environ-
ment.
(2) In the context of the outreach contacts with youth and/or
their families, the Storefront /Youth Action staff trill
evaluate and analyze needs and provide information and
referral to appropriate helping resources and agencies.
C. Storefront /Youth Action shall maintain an office within the
City which shall be staffed faith qualified personnel at all times
during at least the hours of 0 :00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. each 1onday
through Friday. Storefront Action trill provide �.a minimum
of 2 full time professional youth workers in Edina and all resider_::
of Edina shall be eLLSible to participate in any special pro -rams
or activities offered by Storefront /Youth Action. The location,
hours, staffin,;, and telephone number of such offices and personre=
shall be given to the City in writing and shall be posted in all
public places and such private business establisrr..ents (where
permitted) as are typically frequented by youth. Storefrcnt/Youth
Action shall also maintain and publicize a. telephone number at
which qualified personnel may:oe reached at-any time during the
day.
D. Storefront/Youth Action trill provide advocacy services to Edina
youth and or their families by establishing and maintaining
cooperative and coordinated relationships with appropriate
personnel in such agencies or organizations as the City Police
Department, the School 1'7stem, Court Services, and others. This
coordination ::iil include feedback to these or3anizations as
to case disposition of individuals referred to them by that
organization. Storefront/Youth Action will promptly establish
a reporting and feedback system concerning; the individuals
referred to them by the Police Department. A feedback form
shall be sent to the Chief of Police regardir; the case dispos-
-ition within two weeks: after contact. The form of these reports
is to be approved by the City P•;anager's office and the Police
Department.
E. The Storefront /Youth Action staff shall work in close con -
junction with the City Police and Administrative staff with
regard to the regular and routine exchange of appropriate case
information.. Such work shall' include the following:
(1) Immediate notification of the.City Police.Department
of any criminal activity which Storefront/Youth Action becom: -,
aware of, subject to the legal rules of confidentiality.
(2), Participation'iri'Pdlice Department education and training
programs, with Storefront /Youth Action's.role to be deter -
mined by the Chief of Police of the City.
(3) Assistance to the community, police and schools at all times
in dealing with crisis situations.
F. Storefront /Youth Action t:.-i.11 provide community education services
to the residents of the City to develop community awareness and
understanding as specified in its contract with Cominiunity Educati._,
of the Edina Public Schools. Storefront /Youth Action will keep
City informed of these activities. .
G. Storefront /Youth Action will provide assistance and serve as a
consultant to other community organizations as re:,uested by the
City.
H. Storefront /Youth Action i•:ill maintain close contacts with the
Edina Department of Public Safety and the Edina Department of
Parks and Recreation as sources of potential referral of youth
and as a source of information of joint interest concerning youth
activities.
I.
Storefront/Youth Action agrees to provide to the Edina Human
Relations Commission and City Manager any information re�.uested
by such Commission or the City Tanager, relating to the work and
service to be done and delivered hereunder when and as re nested.
Storefront /Youth Action shall provide regular monthly reports
to be received by the City by the 15th of each month following
the month on which the report is given. Storefront/Youth Action
further agrees to meet.once every month with such.Co=-�mission or
its staff, for consultation regarding the status: and progress of
activities hereunder.
J. The Edina Human Relations Commission shall be informed of major
program changes by Storefront /Youth Action prior to such changes
being made.
K. The Edina Iiuman Relations Commission will be kept informed of all
fundin,; activities of Storefront /Youth Action by means of a monti, .
financial report and fiscal year —end report, each to be in such
reasonable detail:ao such Commission or the City Manager shall
rec.uire and "'each ` monthly `report-'to be given by the 15th day of tr:
month following the month for which the _report is given, and the
annual report to be given by 60 days after the end of the fiscal
year.
3. City Responsibilities.
A. The City Manager, or his appointee,. shall serve as liason
between Storefront /Youth action and the City.
B. In consideration for the services rovided as set forth above,
the City agrees to pay Storefront7outh Action the sum of
X1,333.33 per month, each month, herein after through December
of 1978, payable within 10 days after receipt of the monthly
billing, submitted at the end of the month, if the monthly report
referred to in paragraph 2.1 hereof for the month prior to the
month being billed has been received by the City Manager.
C. The City and its Police Department will work in close cooperation
and coordination rrith Storefront /Youth Action staff with regard
to the exchange of case information and development of services;
provided, however, that the City and its Police Department may
withhold any.and all information and services which, in its or
their sole discretion, is deemed confidential or not necessary
or desirable to exchange with Storefront /Youth Action.
4. City Representation on Board of Directors. Upon notice from the City
Manager, the members of Storefront /Youth Action shall elect to its Board of Directors
at its meeting to be held in March of 1978, the City employee or official designated
in such notice (The "City Representative "). The City Representative shall have all of
the powers vested in a Director pursuant to the Articles and By —Laws of Storefront/
Youth Action. Any City Representative serving.on the Board of Directors of Storefront/
Youth Action shall resign immediately upon the expiration or earlier termination of
this Agreement.
5. Indemnification; Insurance. Neither the City nor any of its officers
or employees, including the City Representative serving on the Board of Directors of
Storefront /Youth Action shall be liable for any -acts or ommissions of Storefront /Youth
Action or its officers, directors, members, employees, or agents. Storefront /Youth Action
agrees to indemnify and keep indemnified and defend, hold and save harmless the City
and its officers and employees and such City Representative from and against any and all
actions or causes of action, claims, demands, loss damage or expense, including attorney's
fees, which any such party shall or may at any time claim, sustain or incur by reason
of the acts or omissions or claimed acts or omissions, of Storefront /Youth Action or
any:.of its officers, directors, members, employees, or agents.
Storefront /Youth Action hereby further ` agrees -to carry and keep in
force a policy of comprehensive liability insurance in the minimum amount of
$1,000,000.00. Said policy of insurance shall be i i:th a reliable insurance company
licensed to do business in I nneasota and shall be. in form - and substan ce satisfactory
to the City. Storefront /Youth Action shall furnish the City with a copy of such policy
of insurance and with insurer's certificate indicating that such policy is in full
force and effect . for the full term of this Agreement.
6. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by
resolution of the Edina City Council after public hearing preceeded by at least ten
(10) days prior written notice to Storefront /Youth Action and such termination shall
be effective on the adoption of such resolution or any subse uent date set out in
such resolution. Such termination shall be based upon the default by Storefront/
Youth Action of any of its responsibilities hereunder as determined in the absolute
discretion of the City Council. Any such decision to terminate this Agreement made
by the.City Council shall be final and shall not be appealable to any court or
administrative body. In the event.of such termination, the City after the effective
date thereof, shall have no further obligations or duties of any kind hereunder to
Storefront /Youth Action, including, erithout limitation, any obligation to make any
payments to Storefront /Youth Action even though such payments may have been due at or
prior to the effective date of such termination.
7. Notices. All notices permitted or required hereunder shall be
given, and shall not be deemed to have been duly given unless, in writing and deposited
in-the United States mails, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed
as follows:
If to Storefrort/'fcutii Action:
Edina, Minnesota
If to City: Edina Cit;- Hall
1. ;est 50th Street
Edina, Linnesota 55424
Attention: City :anger
Such addresses ar; j be ci�ar.ed f: o^� tine to time by either party serving notice
thereof as above provised.
the parties hereto have caused this :.reenert to be
duly executed and their corporate seals to be affixed hereto the day and year
first above :critter..
CITY CP EEIJU
BY
Its iayor
(Seal)
And
Its i• a ia; er
STC�'r - 2C;iT/YCUTH ACTICN
I3y
Its President
(Seal)
And
Its itiecorciinS Secretary
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT
APPROVAL FOR TAFT ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,
that that certain plat entitled "Taft Addition ", platted by Andrew
W. Shea and Rosemary M. Shea, husband and wife, and by the First
National Bank of Minneapolis, and presented at the Edina City Council
Meeting of December 19, 1977, be and is hereby granted final plat
approval.
ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 1977.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution
was duly adopted by the Edina City Council on December 19, 1977, and as
recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of December, 1977.
City Clerk
s
r �T..Ti1
TFt b i i
W
- Y_ )
IROQUOIS
t _ CIRCLE
IF
t'
V.
a
r
01
I
A
Q I � r�- '?Y T� o
o K
IM s >
• Q I
a 5 Ix s J
V �� • �1 1 1
A '' PARK ;'� • y
(>
COMPLEX" 1
� � 1
zonin
sui)divisiayl
Banco Properties, Inc. - Northwestern bank Addition
S -77 -28
REQUEST NUMBER: Z -77 -20
LOCATION: Washington Ave. & Valley View
REQUEST: Rezoning and platting for a
NORTH
detached banking facility with a o 2 ;iUl) ;mot) 1tJ�►�)
drive -in teller
village planning dcoarimcnt 3jjIgge of effins
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
Z -77 -20 and Banco Properties, Inc. Rezoning from PID to 0 -1
S -77 -28 Northwestern Bank Addition
Refer to: "Attached graphic and preliminary plat
The subject property is a two acre tract of land located between County
Road 18 and Washington Avenue, and north of Valley View Road. This
property is presently zoned PID, which is in conformance with the
Southwest Edina Plan.
Banco Properties, Inc. proposes to construct a detached banking facility
for Northwestern National Bank of Hopkins on this site. A preliminary site
plan is attached for this facility.
Staff has determined that a detached banking facility is classified as a
financial institution which is not an allowable use in PID zones but is
allowable in office zones. Therefore, the proponents are requesting a
rezoning to 0-1 Office District. A preliminary plat of the property is
also requested:.
Recommendation: Staff believes that the proposed rezoning and use of the
site is appropriate based upon its proximity to the County Road 18 - Valley
View Road Interchange. In other similar locations, such as the T.H. 100 -
Industrial Blvd. industrial area, we have allowed office uses in more visible
locations in close proximity to major interchanges while locating industrial
uses in less visible areas.
Due to the Southwest Edina Plan, however, staff is somewhat reluctant to
recommend the rezoning of one parcel of property without concurrently
amending the Southwest Edina Plan. Therefore, staff recommends a plan
amendment to designate an area abutting the County Road 18 - Valley View
Road interchange as office uses as shown on the attached graphic. Staff
recommends this amendment in that:
1) the improvements to the Valley View - County Road 1°
interchange are essentially complete
2) the area is well suited for office uses.
3) the existing parcels of property in this area are below
minimum size requirements for PID uses and would require
variances to allow such uses. Such variances would not be
required for ofiice uses.
Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning and subdivision with the
following conditions and modifications:
Z -77 -20 and
S -77 -28
Banco Properties
Page 2
November 30, 1977
1) Parkland dedication per the attached report.
2) Rezoning is contingent on the amendment of the
Southwest Edina Plan.
3) Rezoning is contingent on final plat approval..
GH:ks
11/23/77
, � •r . �.i ` � l .r .r."v4 ``tom•,
., ' r , `; ,lid �,`• i `'
'•`•g cr•yl r PAR •• ,Sr f• ,;f F`� \mod' �\ v: Y
BRAEMAR K
s r AND
COURSES
ARC I t q ' ' ° ,. I I , I A , tl\ .�• �+!l �> { .
PA.,GF
1
i sit i r,.: ,'I � .^ 'iti �!�:. •'• :'` 'fir: �,; \ ,
f :!• •.�, t , , , ,.T II I `�� y, \tip.
s , f r .. t#rrn•e t r0 i. L� i `yl I I I ��, :•M: +r - ,•.-.► .-. J„„� ,� :�i:.: �y el�lC
trip+ �f• .. �A?"o;�'! \\'
••s
`:....•.,,,:.:;.'
9 `` - arm *r,•! -� p \ �. :\
Q. �a
,tr,,j,�: y `+tr,,,,- - w l � •�+.._- ..,;ara :.x.r.- "� � *1r, ✓auu'!rs
SOUTHWEST Scale : 1�=600
ENNA PLAN
{5
Clal 1•''
Single Family Res. 0 -4/AC ®Commer L; t�
Mixed Housing Res. 0-6
�AC' Planned Industrial ,. v
1 n
•.� � 0-12/ •a' � Ponding Area
Medium Density Res. — y
r Major Street
Public and Open Space`
• I �— Office
{
r:'4'itS'61� "_p,:)n 6-2-71 ". ..
.
. ■
' cJ.s -T •vne .
- W�FJ11N6rTaM AV9 XVIIVI "' Ityl
I`
SIM USE PLAN s. .t' J .
• AtcfrNWfJ7 -rW V IVAT/oNAL 47ANA'
I
81A vCNUE
WASWWON
GNU n.;
—�0 r /• ' ; I is
" ► ' ao� w.
At
Subdivision No. S 77— 21
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
20: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: O�TV1l,J�R�ISU ►' 1� t�di�
LAND SIZE: 2L ZAc • LAND VALUE:
zonal PID Prepcs to�� tn o -I
(By: Date:
The
y— developer of. this subdivision has been required to
1 1 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate $ of the land
C. donate A as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of-applying the following policy:
A. Land. Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
E], 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so.that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
0 U 4. If property is necessary for storm water holing or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
j_"j 2.
197,7 CITYrOF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
335368 12109/77
336247, 12/09/77
- 3362511 12/09/77
336315 12/09/77
*4* * **
336442 12/09/77
A M OU N
1,120.58
1,120.58
- - -- 928.38 -
92-3.38
15,000.00
15,000.00
56.40
56.40 *
6, 752.39
6,752.39
336700 12/09/77 468.10 -
3367J0 12/09/77 7,301.70
6,833.60
CHECK REGISTER 12 19 77 PAGE 1
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO._INV._ -# - P.O. -1! _ME.SSAGE________
MUTUAL BENEFIT UEC LTD 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL
* * * -C K S
H M 0 SERV DEC HOSP 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL
H -R A_______- .____- - ____ -. TRANSFER
MITCH FALLOON
SALARY 10-4120- 520 -52
PHYS HEALTH PLAN DEC HOSP 10- 4156 - 510 -5L
MN _DIST__INC - DISCOUNT 50- 3710- 002 -00
MN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84
- * ** -CKS ----
_ MANUAL -___ -_
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
- - -- - MANUAL - --
- - * ** -CKS --
_ _MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL_
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL_
✓ * * *r•*
340135
12_/09/77
70.75 --.
_ EAGLE_DIST-
__
_______
- _. _ DISCOUNT -__
50- 3700 - 001 -00 _
340135
12/09/77
_
164.76 -
EAGLE
DIST
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 002 -00
340135
12/09/77
277.25-
EAGLE
DIST
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 003 -00
PHILLIPS
12/09/77
9.47-
EAGLE _DIST
340138
_- DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 001 -UO_
_3401_35
340135
12/09/77
___
15.55-
EAGLE
DiST
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 002 -00
f 340135
12/09/77
24.88-
EAGLE
GIST
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 003 -00
34013,5
12109-/77
1_,334.65__
EAGLE
UIST
_. INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 822 -82__
340135
12%09/77
2,266.61
EAGLE
DIST
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 842 -84
340135
12/09/77
3,632.47
EAGLE
DIST
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
340135
12/09/77
- -- -
15.10
_EAGLE
FIST_
-
INVENTORY
-
6,686.17
- * ** -CKS ----
_ MANUAL -___ -_
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
- - -- - MANUAL - --
- - * ** -CKS --
_ _MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL_
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
- MANUAL_
✓ * * *r•*
* ** -CKS
340138
12/09/77
6.54-
ED
PHILLIPS
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 001 -00
MANUAL
340138
12/09/77_
Eu_
PH ILL IPSUISC0UNT.
50-3710-002-00
340138
-_
12/09%77
- _113.10-
99.16-
ED
PHILLIPS
CISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
MANUAL
340138
12/09/77
4,216.20
ED
PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
_
340138
12/09/77
3,662.20
_ED-
PHILL IRS
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL_ - -;
340138
12/09/77
_
332.76
ED
PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50 -4E28- 822 -82
MANUAL
340138
12/09/77
19481.75
ED
PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
340138
12/-0.9/77 - -
1,336.05 _
_ED
PHILLIPS
_ INVENTORY _ _
50- 4628- 862 -86
_- MANUAL __-
10,810.16
1971 CITY 'OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE
.&.H-ClU.N.T.
CHECK REGISTER 12 19 77 PAGE 2
END-O-R.-
340190
-
12/09/77
15.51-
GRIGGS
COOPER
340190
12/09/77
190.35-
GRIGGS
COOPER
340190
12/09/77
85.14-
GRIGGS
COOPER—
INVENTORY
77
779.45
GRIGGS
COOPER
340190
12/09/77
9,566.68
GRIGGS
COOPER
34019J
12/09/77
4,278.87
GRIGGS
CuOPER.--
340271
12 /09 / 77---------5
14,334.00
INT E.9-
C-CINT
340224 12/09/77
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT No. INV- # P.O. 9 MESSAGE.,---.,-
***-CKS
DISCOUNT
50.-3710-001-00
MANUAL
DISCOUNT
50-3710-002-00
MANUAL
UISCCUNT--.,-.----
- 3710 003- 00. - --
MANUAL
INVENTORY
50-4626-822-82
MANUAL
INVENTORY
50-4626-842-64
MANUAL
INVENTORY
50-4626-862-86
MANUAL
950.18 HENN CNTY FINAANCE REAL ESTATE TAXES
950.18
,340Z85
12/09/77
340285
12/09/77-
340285
340271
12id9l 77
74.00-
INTER
CONT
340271
12/09/77
73.00-
INTER
CONT
34J271
12/09/77_
581.95
-C.ONT
—346
12/09/77
3.22-
INTER
CONT
340271
11/09/77
3.93-
INTER
CONT
340271
12 /09 / 77---------5
.01 -
INT E.9-
C-CINT
7
—12 /0 9 / 7 7
655.67
INTER
CONT
340271
12/09/77
764.69
INfER
CUNT
340271
12/09/77
__l , 0 2 9-. 4 �9
INTER
CUNT
5,033..23
2,182.97
,340Z85
12/09/77
340285
12/09/77-
340285
12 /0 90 7 7
340235
12/09/77
'J402b5
1-2- I-D 9 / 7 7
34285
12/09/77
340235
12/U9/77
340.2-.35
12/09/77 - - -
34 2
12/09/77
49.75-
JOHNSON
WINE
62.67-
0 H N,.S -C N.W.
I N E
31.88-
-J
JOHNSON
WINE
2.92-
JOHNSON
WINE
50-3710-001 -00
JOHNSON
WINE,
1.85-
JOHNSON
WINE
581.95
JOHNSON
WINE
710.2 I
JOHNSON.-
-WINE
- ----
368.36
JOHNSON
WINE
1,507.84
5 0- 3 700-002- 00
MtNUAL.
DISCOUNT
.DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
INVENTORY
INVENTORY
INVENTORY-
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT,
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
INVENTURY
INVENTORY
IN VEN I ORY
-------------- --
------- *-.**-.CKS
Io -lcgl-000-oo
MANUAL
***-CKS
50- 3700 - 001 -00
MANUAL
50-3700-002-00
MANUAL
50- 3100-003 -00__
MANUAL.-------
50-3710-001 -00
MANUAL
50-37107002-00
MANUAL
50-3710-003-00
MANUA
50-4C28-822-82
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -462b- 862- 86_.-_ —_
MANUAL_________
--------- -
12/09/77
50-3700-001-00
MANUAL
5 0- 3 700-002- 00
MtNUAL.
56-3700-603-00
MANUAL
50-3710-001-00
MANUAL
50-3710-002 0.0
M A N UA L -_ ------
50-3710-003-00
MANUAL
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842- 84__ —_
___..___MANUAL_,_____
50- 4628- E62 -86
MANUAL
***-CKS
—34-0413 I2/09/77
76.27- OLU PEORIA DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 002 -00
***-CKS
MANUAL
340349
12 /09 / 7
____ -- _87.75 -_
M IUWEST
WINE—_
DI.SCOUNT-.--------.-----.50-3700--001-00.-.-
50-3700-002-00
__-.-.MANUAL _.. - ---
MANUAL
346349 - - —
12/09/77 - - ----
236.90-
MIDWEST
WINE
DISCOUNT
DISCOUNT
50-3700-003-00
MANUAL
340349
12/09/77
193.05-
MIDWEST
MIDW EST
WINE
WINE
INVENTORY
50-4628-822-82
MANUAL
34034 -9
12�09/77
892.20
796.63
MIDwEST
WINE
INVENTORY----
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
12/09/77
11862.10
MIDWEST
WINE
INVENTORY
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
340349
5,033..23
—34-0413 I2/09/77
76.27- OLU PEORIA DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 002 -00
***-CKS
MANUAL
14477 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 19 77 PAGE 3
ITEM .DESCRIPTION.
_._A000CNT_ _NO._,__INV_
_...#_ P..O._ #_.MESSAGE.___- ___ -__
340418
12/09/77
66.33-
OLD PEORIA
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 003 -00
MANUAL
340418
12/09/7?
17.69 -
OLD PEOk1A
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 001 -00
MANUAL
340�r18
12/09/77
185. U5-
OLD PEORIA
DISCOUNT
50 -3710- 002 -00
MANUAL
34J418
12/09/77
72.99-
OLD PFOKIA
CISCOUNT
50- 3710- CO3 -CO
MANUAL
340418
3464
12/09/77
- - - --
-- - - - - -- 888.2_6 --
OLD PEORIA
- --
INVENTORY
50- 462E -- 822 -82
MANUAL
18
17/09/77-
. .
9,379.15
- _ .
OLD PE01?IA
- - - -- - -
INVENTORY
- - -- -
50 -4626- 842-84
- -- - -- - -- - -
MANUAL
s
340418
12109/77
3,334.84
OLU PEOk.IA
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 862-86
MANUAL
340418
12/09/77
403.80
OLD PEURIA
INVENTORY - ---
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
13,587.22 #
-------
-...__ -_ -- - -- -------
- - - - - --
- --
- - - - -- -----------------
.._.__.
# ## -CKS _
'340451
12/09/77
111.30
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3.700 - 001 -00
MANUAL
_3404_51.
12- /09/77
_ 111.30-
WUAL 1 TY_ -� IN E _
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- C01_ -00
MANUAL
340451
12/09/77
111.30-
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 001 -00
MANUAL
`•
340451
12/09/77
2"27.40-
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 002 -00
MANUAL
340451
12109177
449.36-
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 003 -00
MANUAL
340451
12/09/77
13.9A-
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 001-00
MANUAL
340451
12 /Uri /77
34.50-
CUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 002 -00
MANUAL
340451
12/09/77
50.75-
QUALITY VINE
CISCOUNT
50 -3710- 003 -00
MANUAL
340451
12/09/77
820.15
taUALIIY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 622 -82
MANUAL
340451
12/09/77
19972.05
QUALITY WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
c
340451
- 12_/_09/77. -
- 39011.60_
QUALITY
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL__.__
<
-
49916.51 #
_WIr1F
_
_
_- _
- —
- - - - - --
- - - - - -- -- - -- -
- - - -- -- __ __
# ## CKS ... - -- --
a'
340540
12/09/77
110.87-
TWIN CITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - '001 -00
MANUAL
340-540
1.2 /09/77 _
_ 11065.61-
TWIN CITY WINE
DI SCUUNT
50- 3700 - 002- 00_____
MANUAL
340540
12/09/77
507.45-
TWIN CITY WINE
_
DISCOUNT
-
50- 3700 - 003 -00
-- _
MANUAL
.'?
340540
12/09/77
95.40-
TWIN CITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 001 -00
MANUAL
- 340540
12/09/77
__ _________580.42-
TWIN _CITY WINE
DISCOUNT _
50 -3710- 002 -00
MANUAL
340540
12/09/77
206.78-
TWIN CITY WINE
_ _
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
MANUAL
340540
12/09/77
59025.32
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
f
340540,___12/09
/77
- 27,r3E4.41TWIN
CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
3405-40
12/09/77
9x640.43
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTURY
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
'=
3405 +0
12/09/77
178.53
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
_340540
12 /09/775,393.81
- _TWIN_CITY WINE
INV ENT URY.
50 -4628- 842- 84
MANUAL_
340540
12/09/77
39369.47
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
489405.44 #
e ## —CKS
342346
12109_/7798,01.040
METRO WASTE ._CONT ____- .____.._____RESERVE.
CAP__ CHG.__---__._10-3C9-5-
000.-
MANUAL,
93,010.00 #
.00.-- __-
__- _.___- _ -. - --
# # ##
# # #- CKS_.. - - - -- -
342701
12/09/77
39489.90
MN STATE TREASURER
CLASS 8 SURCH
10 -3095- 000 -00
MANUAL
34270.1
12_/_09/77
_ 205.00
MN_ STATE TREASURER __..
CLASS A .SUkCH
MANUAL- _.______
3,694.90
_- .-
X342702
12/09/77
162.92
WESCO
LAMPS - -- -
10- 4606- 540 -54
- --
MANUAL
162.92 #
- -
*� 1477 cIfv OF EuImo
CHECK NO. DATE
34271Z 12/14/77
{�
0
c*pca REGISTER
'�r-TnxmS-- —' uuonS- 50.00 MN EVT
50.00 *
******
343430 12/14/77 11,774~ry�_
1z,7r+.rv *
****^*
345135
12/1*/77
._3451
2/1+/77
3�5 1y5
12d4/77
34513*
12/1*/77
12/14/77
12/14/77
_34o1s
a*nmr
12/14/77
345135
12/14x77
�
�
+
Isas
�
� ^
346133
1; j-r/------
_346
34614o
346138
12/14/77
^
5.9u-
1a/14/rr______
I
_3461
3*6138
12m4/77
134.+6-
346138 '
12/1*/77
�
w«wu4L
1e/1+/77
�
_346133
346138
________
12/14/77
MANUAL
s4 f,/3a
12/1+/77
�
e0-4628-842-e+
1z/14/r7_____
�
_34613
3+613e
12/14/77
psxA
psnx
12 19 77 PAGE 4
P.o~_w- MESSAGE_
***-cKS
10-4204-260-26 MANUAL
---- '--------'--'-
***-CKS
Isas
�
o/ScouwT
_***-C KS__-_-
2114/77
_346
34614o
12/14v77
3*6190
12/14/77
5.9u-
/1+/7/_
346190
12m4/77
psxA
psnx
12 19 77 PAGE 4
P.o~_w- MESSAGE_
***-cKS
10-4204-260-26 MANUAL
---- '--------'--'-
***-CKS
1e,786.04 *
__50.19
Isas
Cunpsn
o/ScouwT
_***-C KS__-_-
106.00-
s^sLs ozsT
oIscouwz
50-3700-002-00
mAwuuc
5.9u-
EAGLE uIsT
oIucoowr
50-3710-002-00------.-
MANUAL
134.+6-
sxsLs nIST
.
nzScuumr
50-3710-ou3-00
w«wu4L
9.51-
EAGLE ozsr
oIacoomT
so-svzo-oos-mo
MANUAL
811.55
�xsT
IwvswroaY
e0-4628-842-e+
MANUAL
_____c«oLc
z,905.30
EAGLE oIs7
_
ImvemToo,
50-4c28-8t2-86
mxmuAL
100.50
p»oL* oIST
ImvEwronv
50-+632-8+2-8+
nxwuuL
2, 561.4 0-��--_____---__
2/14/77
10.97-
INTER
ccmT
pxs
oIscuowr
***-cms
-----48.
PHILLIPS -_----
oxscouwT ------------e0-3710-001-00
----'-----'
'wxmuxL ---'
141.013-
so p*ILLzpy
uIsCoomT
50-3710-002-00
nmwuxL
69.5 7__
PH ILL Ips
nzscouwx
eo-svzu-nnu-oo
wAwoxL
2,325.92
so PHILLIPS
ImvemroxY
50-+626-e22-e2
mAwu*L
6.13*.92
so PHILLIPS
zmvsm7oxY
*0-4626-8*2-84
n^muxL
3,101.21
Ph ILL Ips
x*vswToxv
50-462C-862-86
_ wxmoAL
115.50
-ED
eo PHILLIPS
amvemruuv
50-+626-822-82
m«wuAL
397.99
so PHILLIPS
INvswxowv
50-4628-862-86
MANUAL
166.99
�su PH ILL Ips
xwvcm7onv
50-*632-842-84
MAmoxL
_
797.76
so phILLxps
/mvswromv
50-4638-8*2-84
MANUAL
1e,786.04 *
__50.19
Isas
Cunpsn
o/ScouwT
59.76-
GnLssS
Couesn
oxScouwr
2.514.27
onzGos
Cuupem
IwvswTonY
3,003.*
IsGs_cuopsx
Imvsmronv
19.35
axI000
conpsx
ImvcwTonv
s.4ur./a *
wr
pus
oxsuzowr
50-3710-002_00
50-3710-003-00
50-4626-8+2-8*
50-4626-862-86
eU-4632-842-8+
50-3 700-002-00 _
ou-yruu-000-oo
50-3710-002-00
50-3710-003-00
50-4628-842-84
so-*uza-ouu-ua
**=-CnS
*xmuAL
MANUAL
n«mo4L
mmxuAL
mmvuAL
*AmuAL_-_--
MANUAL
� *xwuAL
mAwuxL
mxmuuc
*»muAL
***-CKs
****~*
�/1*/7
l��.o
pn_CC
wr
pus
oxsuzowr
'
_346
2*6irz
/2vz��rr
uv.zu-
�wrs�
cuwr
Pxs
oIscuuwT
3462.71
12/14/77
1+.56-
Im7en
Cowr
pK.G
uxscouwr
2/14/77
10.97-
INTER
ccmT
pxs
oIscuowr
_34621
3*6271
12/14/77
859.30
INTER
comr
pxs
Iwvswxoxr
�]
3462,I
12/14/77
614.22
INTER
Cowr
pxs
Iwvew7oxY
50-3710-002_00
50-3710-003-00
50-4626-8+2-8*
50-4626-862-86
eU-4632-842-8+
50-3 700-002-00 _
ou-yruu-000-oo
50-3710-002-00
50-3710-003-00
50-4628-842-84
so-*uza-ouu-ua
**=-CnS
*xmuAL
MANUAL
n«mo4L
mmxuAL
mmvuAL
*AmuAL_-_--
MANUAL
� *xwuAL
mAwuxL
mxmuuc
*»muAL
***-CKs
-__- _.39.40 -
1477 CITY
OF EDINA
REGISTER
__. DISCOUNT____.
12 19 77 PAGE 5
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
GATE
+
X346285
12/14/77
JOHNSCN
346285
_12/14/77
50- 3700- 001 -00
346235
12/14/77
S'
346235
12/14/77
50- 3700- 002 -00
346235
36.65-
JOHNSON
__3
_12/14/77
12/14/77
50- 3700- 003-00
346295
.12/14/77
JOHNSCN
WINE
12/14/77
50- 3710 - COI -00
_346205_
346285
12/14/77
JOHNSON
WINE
CISCOUNT
-__- _.39.40 -
- W,I'N_
T
CHECK
REGISTER
__. DISCOUNT____.
12 19 77 PAGE 5
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
# P.O. # MESSAGE
33.10-
JOHNSCN
WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 001 -00
MANUAL
85.60-
JOHNSON
WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 002 -00
MANUAL
36.65-
JOHNSON
WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 003-00
MANUAL
7.47-
JOHNSCN
WINE
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - COI -00
MANUAL
17.27-
JOHNSON
WINE
CISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 002 -00
MANUAL
6.83-
JOHNSON
WINE
DISCOUNT
50 -37LO- 003 -00
MANUAL
415.45
JUHNSCN
WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
968. i3
JCH�SCN
WINE
INVENIORY
50 -4t28- 842 -84
MANUAL
385.78
JOHNSON
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1,582.44 #
-__- _.39.40 -
- W,I'N_
T
CLT_Y__,y;
rtes
__. DISCOUNT____.
209.x+7-
TWIN
- -- ----- - -- - --
* ** -CKS
12_/14/77
-
.346540
80.28-
12/14/77
vJ
34t540
12/14/77
42._4.9-
_346349
12/14/77
12/14/77-------- ____
-- _ -- 70.25. -_ - --
M.IDWEST_.WINE ._._._
-.. - 01SCOUNT ...--- _ - - - --
50- 3700 - 002 -00_._
MANUAL
DISCOUNT
34634y
12/14/77
41.20-
MIOWESf WINE
DISCOUNT
- -- .--- ------
50 -3700- 003 -00
....-- _ -_ - -- -- --
MANUAL
12/14/77
346349
12/14/77
842.58
MIDWEST WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4628- 242 -84
MANUAL
34t540
346349
12/14/.77
450.10 --
MIDWEST WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL__
WINE=
INVENTORY
29026.53
1081.23
*
CITY
- -- - - -
-- - -- ------ . _-
-
4)
CIIY
WINE
INVENTORY
* **
-
* ** CKS
346418
12/14/77
22.60-
OLD PEORIA
DISCOUNT
50- 3700- 002 -00
MANUAL
346418
12/14/77
- 33.12 -_ - -
-- -OLD PEORIA
DISCOUNT
50- 3700 - 003-00.
MANUAL
346418
12/14/77
S4.28-
OLD PEORIA
DISCOUNT
- - --
50- 3 710- 002-00
- - - --
MANUAL
346418
12/14/77
26.40-
OLD PEuk1A
DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
MANUAL
_3.46418
12/14/77,
49224.57
INVENTORY
50- 4626 - 842- 84
MANUAL
346418
12/14/77
1,311.10
ULU PEOP IA
iNVENTUkY
50 -4626- 862 -86
1.
MANUAL
. °=
346410
12/14/77
111.25
OLD PEORIA
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
346418
12/14/17
432.95
ULU PEORIA
INVENTORY
_. - - - --- -
- - - -- - 50 -4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
:?
*
5,953.47
-- -
* * * *s#
- - -
- -- - - ***- CKS.. - - --
346451
12/14/77
47.50-
QUALITY WINE
DISCOUNT
50 -3700- 003 -00
MANUAL
346451
12/14/77 —
-- - 6..15 - - --
QOAL1TY_ -- WINE ______
.,
346451
12/14/77
358.00
QUALIIY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
-i:
304.35.
-__- _.39.40 -
- W,I'N_
T
CLT_Y__,y;
rtes
__. DISCOUNT____.
209.x+7-
TWIN
346540
-- - - ---
12_/14/77
-
.346540
80.28-
12/14/77
vJ
34t540
12/14/77
42._4.9-
346_540
12/14/77
_WINE -
346540
12/14/77
1WIN
3465x0
12/14/77
DISCOUNT
346540
12/14/77 -
--
346.540
12/14/ 17
'1
34E540
12/14/77
WINE
346:540_
12/14/77
TWIN
3-4-
12/14/77
D
34t540
12/14/77
-__- _.39.40 -
- W,I'N_
T
CLT_Y__,y;
I N E
__. DISCOUNT____.
209.x+7-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
DISCOUNT
80.28-
TkIN
CITY
WINE
DISCOUNT
42._4.9-
TWIN -
_CITY -
_WINE -
DISCOUNT_____
174.32-
1WIN
CITY
WINE
DISCOUNT
49.43-
TWIN
CITY
WINE
DISCOUNT
175.59 ___
TWIN
-CIIY
WINE
INVENIORY
7,339.47
TWIN
C11Y
WINE
INVENTORY
549.85
TWIN
CITY
-WINE
INVENTORY
19536.51
]WIN
CITY
WINE=
INVENTORY
29026.53
1w.IN
CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
134.51
TWIN
CIIY
WINE
INVENTORY
13,166,57*
- ----------- - -5,0- 3700- OQ1 -00 -- -- - - - - --
50 -3700- 002-00
50- 3700 - 003 -00
50- 3710 - 001 -00
50- 3710 - 002 -00
50 -3710- 003 -00
50- 4626- 822 -82
- - -- 50- 4626-842-84 - - --
50 -4626- 862 -86
SU- 4628 - 842 -84
- 50 -4628- 862 -86 - - - - - -- -
50- 4632- 842 -84
* ** -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL -
MANUAL
MANUAL
® *rcoaa
*4* -CKS
' --- - ----
12 89 77 PAGE
AccoumT NP-.,-xmV~ w.p°D. w MESSAGE
10-4e20-560-56 66112 6790
10-4620-560-56 3844
- ------'--'- --'----- ---------'l
***-CmS
10-*248-560-56 46141 e806
50-.4200_841-.845723
10-+50+-260-26 43015
***-CmS
- �
-
^�^",^., ,
-
INC -
- *s�en -
-
-
7248*9
-�� s
snaoea 1
12m3/77 1
1.220.00 o
oxoopn wsrsx INC P
1§77 Cxfr
OF eoInx
725e38
CHECK nsaxSxEn
9975,
CHECK NO.
E
__4Moumr___
__VsNoon _
ITEM osSCnIprIom
u^LoWIw su,pLv Co n
3530m8
12/13/77
5.00
Axnow*eAo osxnIwG
PARTS.
sz,e
ananoe
zz/zzyrr
25.70
AuTLcpoxo sQuxp co
PARTS
--372.00
AUTOMOBILE '5snvIcs c
REPAIRS ------
353012
12/09/77
372.00
*
----- --
' '---------
'
353016
1,2/09/77
__________200. 00
4NDsCApIy_G _
Swuw PLOW IwG___
aoo.00
�
�71
353019
12/1+/77
16.13
ART S Isw
SUPPLIES
-
�
za.
--__-
---_-- --
---_-_-_.
�
' --- - ----
12 89 77 PAGE
AccoumT NP-.,-xmV~ w.p°D. w MESSAGE
10-4e20-560-56 66112 6790
10-4620-560-56 3844
- ------'--'- --'----- ---------'l
***-CmS
10-*248-560-56 46141 e806
50-.4200_841-.845723
10-+50+-260-26 43015
***-CmS
- �
",""�� ^
^�^",^., ,
�� I
INC -
- *s�en -
-'30-1220-000-00 ----------'
7248*9
-�� s
snaoea 1
12m3/77 1
1.220.00 o
oxoopn wsrsx INC P
PETERS 3
30-1220-000-00 7
725e38
a 9
9975,
ononzr 1
12112177 3
32.85 u
u^LoWIw su,pLv Co n
nspAzu PARTS 5
50-4540-821-82 2
24682 6884
x s
sz,e
_ ___
1977 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 19 77 PAGE 7
CHECK NO. DATE_.- _-- _ -__ -_ __ _ AMOUNT VENDUR ITEM DESCRIPTION _ _ _ ACCOLNT- NO. INV. N. P.O. # MESSAGE_ _
`-N
460.86
9.30
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 120 -12
STA
353047
12/14/77
.,�
353047
12/14/77
9.51
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508- 200 -20
57A
`-
353047
12/14/77 -
- - - -- - 17.50
BROWN PHOTO
- - - -
PHOTO SUPPLIES - - --
10 -4508- 440 -44
STA -
353041
12/14/77
1,230.01
---
12/14/77
6.90
CARLSON
INC
RED[
MIX
_ _- -- _____
- -_- 10- 4524 - 301 -30 5336
•
353041
_
12/14/77
_
184.50
BURY'E
_G
CARLSON
_ .-
INC
_, --
RED[
MIX
30- 4524- 783 -78 5336
353041
12/14/77
779.00
BURY
E
CARLSON
INC
RED[
MIX
BURESH ROBERT
60- 1300 - 299-02 5336
4202- 440 44
- -- - 10 -
353041
12/13/77_
980.00
CARLSON
INC
PMT
3 64
228
_ 60 -2C40- 000 -00
_
353041
_
12/13/77
_ _
635.9.3
_BURY
BURY
_6
E
CARLSON
INC
Pf1T
3 BA
223
60 -2C40- 000 -00
353041
12/13/77
510.31
BURY
S
CARLSON
INC
PMT
4 BA
222
60- 2040 - 000 -00
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
353041
12/13/77
507.70
BURY
E
CARLSON
INC
PMT
4 BA
221 - -
- -- 60- 2C40- 000 -00 - -!
12669
_
353041
12/13/77 -- -
- -- L,J °1.76 - - - --
-BURY
6
CARLSON
INC
PMT
4 BAZ18
6703
60- 2040-000 -00
353054
353041
12/13/77
460.94
BURY
E
CARLSON
INC
PMT
4 B A
Z17
60- 2040 - 000 -00
BATTERY WAkEHOUSE
353041
12/13/77
_ 345.99
BURY
E
CA_RLSON
INC
PMT
4 BA
211
60 -2C40- 000 -00
17774
_6667
6873
6,716.14
356.82
C
353058
12/14/77
_200.00
353044 12/12177 16.72 BILL BOYER FORD PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 61106 6771
16.72
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS_
* ** -CKS
_ - * *s -CKS_ _-
-- * * * -C KS - --
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
9.30
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 120 -12
STA
353047
12/14/77
.,�
353047
12/14/77
9.51
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508- 200 -20
57A
`-
353047
12/14/77 -
- - - -- - 17.50
BROWN PHOTO
- - - -
PHOTO SUPPLIES - - --
10 -4508- 440 -44
STA -
- - --
- -
353047
---
12/14/77
6.90
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
20 -4508- 627 -62
STA
•
43.21
353049
12/09/77
18.50
BURESH ROBERT
REIM EXPENSE - - --
4202- 440 44
- -- - 10 -
' -�
353054
12/09/77
53.20
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
15514
6662
353054
12/09/77_____
____96.48
__BATTERY WAREHOUSE
SUPPLIES _
10- 4504 - 560 -56
12669
6693
353054
12/09/77
68.48
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
12806
6703
353054
12/09/77
42.50
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 560 -56
15516
6703
353054
12/09/77
___53.20
BATTERY WAkEHOUSE
SUPPLIES
4504 - 560-56
15515
353054
12/OS/77
42.96
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
_10-
10- 4620 - 560 -56
17774
_6667
6873
356.82
353058
12/14/77
_200.00
_
POLICE SER -NOV _DEC___-_10
-4100- 420- 42__._-
_- ._ -____
200.00
353065
12/14/77
13.40
CULLIGAN
TANK SERV
10- 4200- 482 -48
13.40
#
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS_
* ** -CKS
_ - * *s -CKS_ _-
-- * * * -C KS - --
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
NZ,
.-
11977 CITY o
oF coIwA C
CHECK wEGxsTsm 1
12 1
19 77 PAGE 0
��
y-�
�
�
CHECK T
T �
��ou�T o
opx _ _ I
Irsx oEsCmIpTIou ______AcC.oUmTwo__Imv.-_w_P-zp~_#-.meSSuGE,_______
K�
353073 1
12113/77 z
za.*a c
czrY asen oIsr. /
/mvEmroxv 5
50-*630-822-82 S
STA
/13y77 4
447^4CITY B
BEER oIsr. _
INVENTORY 5
50-4630-642-84 o
oTA
_��3 /
12/13r77 1
170.48 C
_ I
Imvsmronv 5
50-4630-862-86 s
srA
0 o
onoora 1
12/13177 5
58.22 c
czTv oscn oIsr. I
ImvsmTonY 5
50-4632-822-82 u
uvu
12/13/77 7
79.36 -
eEcx ozs7. _
zmvsmroxv
e0-46 3 2-8+2-84 s
sTA
_35307 1
12/13/77 - -
- a+o.ar C
-CITY e
Imvswroxv
50-+632-862-86 S
SI»
z,oan.o» *
� �
-dF'-kLooM-xws'Tow - n
nouuIun REM OVAL -------'zu-�2yo-as�a-an r
rua -
------------'------��
i�r77----------'-- -
290.00 *
-�����------------------------ '
'-------'-----' -
- -
------'------�- -
--'- ----�—� -
------------- C
CKa--�---
~ 3
3530 1
12/09/77 _
112.00 c
cocA COLA aoTrLIwn _
uopoLzss
�o-�a�z-ao9-uz S
STA
snoora �� �
_____ 1
448.50 c
_ u
GRILL auppc%sS 2
28-462+-704-70 S
Sxx
353078 1
12/13v77 3
325.90 C
COCA COLA aorrLIwG /
/mvswroxv 5
50-4632-8,22-82 S
STA
35*07 1
12/13/77 6
6*2.15 c
coCx cnL^ ooT7LIms x
xwvswToxv 5
50-4632-842-84 S
SxA
-j53o78------1a/1s/7r---- -
-'-----472.10 - x
xocx COLA unzTLzws z
zwvswxuxv ------ -
- 50-4632-862-86 S
Sx^ -
----
~~ ,
us 2 ouo *
�
140.00 C
COMMUNITY cisAmxws p
pLoum CLs»wxws---- ---- 5
50-4200-828-82' �
�935---�--'-----'----------�
2/13/77 ------------ 1
1*0.00 *
***-CmS -
� _
_7a.»4 C
CONT. _SAFETY sAu/p. a
aLovas 2
20-4504-6*6-64. 2
2-8716-_68a2_-_--_-_-____
� r
r6.n+ *
-CnS____
a»»oo» 1
12a4/77 2
20.00- c
coox PAINT s v4pmIs* C
CREDIT 1
10-+50*-335-30 3
38280
353083 1
12/14/77 _
__24.50 C
COOK PAINT 5` vAxmIs* I
IuLuoL _
10-*504-335.-30 �
�37*56_-�e��'_-__--____-_'
�
4.50 �
_
.�
__***.-CmS_____
aoaopo 1
12/12/77 1
11.33 C
CLUTCH u u Jolm7 p
pAxrs 1
10-*620-560-56 3
39920
s
_Jozwr_ _ p
pAnrs _
uzu.+r "
___________.10--462-0,-560-56_655+7__69-07-______________�
***-coS�_-__-
~+ 3
3e3106 1
12/14/77 z
zom.00 o
oA*L- ox *ILo/ws P
POLICE ssn NOV DEC 1
10-4100-*20-+2
200.0
_ _
__��_____________________._____
3
353107 1
12/12/77 2
29.22 o
oALCo conponATIow c
cLs»wImn suppLIes 1
10-4512-*20-e2 *
*8119
.. �
a9, z �
�
1'977 CIYY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT--- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION-
353110 12/13/77 78.80 DAVICSEN DIST.INC INVENTORY
12 19 77 PAGE 9
_ACCOUNT --NO.--INV.-.#-..P.-O.-.N MESSAGE- -
50- 4630- 862 -86 STA
***-CKS
* *a-CKS
* **-C,KS __
***-CKS
22 _2' - 2
10-4 4-4 0-4 627583
###-CKS
10-4248-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
***-CKS
10-4224-504-50 STA
***-CKS
353120
12/14/77
39989.22
DORSEY M-AkQUART ETAL
LEGAL SERV OCT
10-4218-220-22 STA
4.00
3,989.22
2.77
ID
353125
12/14/77
48.00 ---DUDLEY
EDITH
SALARY
--10-4120-160-16--.
353164
12/09/77
52.50
48.00
REPAIRS
GCLU MEDAL BEVERAGE
353164
12/69 /77_____
254.21 -FREEWAY
DODGE INC'
PARIS
12/13/77
331.35
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE
306.71
50-4632-862-86
STA
784.85_*
--- - -------
353143
12/09/77
18.11
EMRICH CAKING CO
GRILL SUPPLIES
27-4624-664-66 STA
11.48
GOODIN COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
30-4540-783-78
528119
353176
12/14/77
89677.80
353144
12/14/77
300.00
ERICKSON THOMAS
LEGAL SER NOV CEC,
10-4216-220-22
G.L.CONTRACTING INC
PMT I SS 346
300.00
12/14/77
19289.16
G.L.CCNIRACTING INC
***-CKS
* *a-CKS
* **-C,KS __
***-CKS
22 _2' - 2
10-4 4-4 0-4 627583
###-CKS
10-4248-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
***-CKS
10-4224-504-50 STA
***-CKS
353.156
12/12/77
4.00
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
LAB CHG G DOWNING
I0-_4504-420 -42__I5921________
4.00
2.77
ID
353184
_S531_84
12/13/77
156.15
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50-4632-822-82
353164
12/09/77
52.50
FREEWAY DODGE INC
REPAIRS
GCLU MEDAL BEVERAGE
353164
12/69 /77_____
254.21 -FREEWAY
DODGE INC'
PARIS
12/13/77
331.35
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE
306.71
50-4632-862-86
STA
784.85_*
--- - -------
353185
12/14/77
11.48
GOODIN COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
30-4540-783-78
528119
353176
12/14/77
89677.80
G.L.CONTRACTING INC
PMT WM 330
353176
12/14/77
16t803.88
G.L.CONTRACTING INC
PMT I SS 346
353176
12/14/77
19289.16
G.L.CCNIRACTING INC
PMT I STS 158
26,770.84_*
G.SYLVESTRE ASSUC TS
CONSUT SERV
353178
150.50
150.50
***-CKS
* *a-CKS
* **-C,KS __
***-CKS
22 _2' - 2
10-4 4-4 0-4 627583
###-CKS
10-4248-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
60-2040-000-00
***-CKS
10-4224-504-50 STA
***-CKS
353183
12/1.3/77
2 . 7 7
GIVENS INCORPORATED—-
-.----KEYS
I0-_4504-420 -42__I5921________
2.77
ID
353184
_S531_84
12/13/77
156.15
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50-4632-822-82
STA
42/13/77
297.35
GCLU MEDAL BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50-4632-841-84
STA
353164
12/13/77
331.35
GOLD MEDAL BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50-4632-862-86
STA
784.85_*
353185
12/14/77
11.48
GOODIN COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
30-4540-783-78
528119
c*sCn psszSTem
vsmuo� ITEM oEScnIpTlow
-_-__- '
0000Im Cowpwvr pepAxn PARTS
GsNER*['CoMnumICArms wAImT CowT 1424
sEwsnxL CuMwumICATmS mAIwT cow7 1423
oswexmLcuomumIc»rws u^oIo aEm7uL
scu ^ CLARK & sow
SCREW onIvsn
s*ovcL
--'-----------'--' '
ssmsnoL ELECTRIC PARTS
12 19 77 PAGE 10
__-__A.ccouwi-wo.--I.mv-_#..P-.g.wms3SwGE.-_
30-+5+0-7e*-7e 81*30 6929
***-CKS
'----10-4274-420-*2 �1906 '--'--'------�
10-+274-560-56 1905
10_429*-301-30 1907_____�________
10-+e80-318-30 64608* 6913
_20-4580-646-64-644640 _6774
------''--- - -------'-----------
10-4620-446-*4 7*419 6807
? 12/09/77 249.22 -�---�-- BLUE PRINTING -----------zu-4n70-26b-26-STA--'
249.22 *
� z ____30.9 ,R._ TOLL _COMPANY _ osmunxAss ________-10-4610-560-5-6.09917 LO
� so.+r *
^ � 3532L6 12m4/77 s . /s yxssm uppxcs smuxp wzoumv xo-45L6-e10-51 2313
�
"~
r/
353219
1'977 COY
OF snIm*
150.00 *
CHECK NO.
DATE
-AMcuuT'--_-__
za/npnr
3e3185
zz/oy/rr
197.57
16.00 *
------
�.75--
353194
12 /1 ---------'--162
�J
353194
12/14/77
172.00
/og �rr-----�-------4z^sa'--
12/14/-77-----------
18.00
1210*177
-353
_
ana.r* *
�
140.04�_�
.�
353201
12x13/77
*.+z
353201
---__'-----__--83~45
--
or.or *
******
35320+
12x13/77
15.30
�
�
c*sCn psszSTem
vsmuo� ITEM oEScnIpTlow
-_-__- '
0000Im Cowpwvr pepAxn PARTS
GsNER*['CoMnumICArms wAImT CowT 1424
sEwsnxL CuMwumICATmS mAIwT cow7 1423
oswexmLcuomumIc»rws u^oIo aEm7uL
scu ^ CLARK & sow
SCREW onIvsn
s*ovcL
--'-----------'--' '
ssmsnoL ELECTRIC PARTS
12 19 77 PAGE 10
__-__A.ccouwi-wo.--I.mv-_#..P-.g.wms3SwGE.-_
30-+5+0-7e*-7e 81*30 6929
***-CKS
'----10-4274-420-*2 �1906 '--'--'------�
10-+274-560-56 1905
10_429*-301-30 1907_____�________
10-+e80-318-30 64608* 6913
_20-4580-646-64-644640 _6774
------''--- - -------'-----------
10-4620-446-*4 7*419 6807
? 12/09/77 249.22 -�---�-- BLUE PRINTING -----------zu-4n70-26b-26-STA--'
249.22 *
� z ____30.9 ,R._ TOLL _COMPANY _ osmunxAss ________-10-4610-560-5-6.09917 LO
� so.+r *
^ � 3532L6 12m4/77 s . /s yxssm uppxcs smuxp wzoumv xo-45L6-e10-51 2313
�
"~
353219
zzm�xrr
- ---
�so.00
150.00 *
16.00
a»yzzo
za/npnr
16.00 *
------
_�5»22
rz
�
snaaz
/og �rr-----�-------4z^sa'--
soszzz
1210*177
46.00
140.04�_�
14+.90
3 5 oz2u
12/14m7
-- - - -----'
*Amsonu PomrIAc sQuxpT nswToL
----------' - -- - ----
*Ax wso Luoecx Co SuppLxsS
xEuusnG u_nums Co _ _ onAvsL________
*soucxo & suws Co smAvsL
/eonsxs u Sows co GnxvsL
--` --' --------
10-21*0-000-00
40-4504-801-80 96934
30-+522-783-78 *5960
30-+522-7e3-78 45961
60-1300-323-02 45962
*ILLSTno* Aoro sup Y uuppLxss 10-4*04-.440-++ Sx^
'
------
- — - 7-���
----
***-CmS
***-CmS
------------
***-cmS
-------
***-cmS
______
`.�
-
1477 CItv O
OF soIxA c
c*sCu nssIsTsn k
ka 19 7
77 P
PAGE 81
e~\ �
�
CHECK Nn. e
IE«nouwT_ V
VENDOR _ a
arsn DESCRIPTION *
*CcoLmT/ NO. _INV. _# P.O. w w
wsSSAGs_____
'Asazzo 1
12/1+x77 6
6.6o *
*ILLSrnow xuro 5op Y s
soppLzES 1
10-+50+-560-56 S
Sxm
12/14/77 5
594. z
zLLsraoM Auro Sop v P
PARTS
746.26 *
*
!? a
asszso 1
12/12/77 7
7.97 *
*opp RUBBER STAMP Co N
NOTARY STAMP wsux 1
10 -+504-160-16 5
5972
7_pr *
*�
1977 CITY OF ECINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDCIP. ITEM DESCRIPTION
rq 43.13 #
-- ---- - - - - -- -
12 19 77 PAGE 12
ACCOUNT N0. [NV. (! P.O. # MESSAGE
* ** -CKS
353292
12/09/77
286.41
JOHNSON
PAPER SUPPLY
BAGS
50 -4514- 822 -82
33607__6928
353282
12/69/77
680.44
JOHNSON
PAPER SUPPLY
_ _
BAGS
50- 4514 - 842 -84
33608
6928
'. 353282
12/09/77
508.42
JOHNSCN
PAPER SUPPLY
BAGS
50- 4:14 - 862 -86
33609
6928
272.00
LGGIS
1,475.27 #
LAWSGN
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 855407 6828
353317
12/09/77
_
,D
353317
12/09/77
88.01
LAWSCN
PRODUCTS
PARTS
# ** -CKS
353286
12/09/77
55.06
JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER
30- 4604- 782 -78
33876
6856
353324
55.00 #
571.39
LOGIS
- - - --
- -- -- -
353324
12/0;/77
-
�Y
LUG1S - - --
- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- -
•
- -- -
12109/77
406.70
LGGIS
* ** -CKS
-------
-- -- - --
•ti.
353288
12/09/77
68.88
JOHNSON
RALPH
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 200 -20
6,535.28 #
°.> 353302 12/13/77 503.56 KUETHEk DISTRIBUTING INVENTORY
353302 12/13/77 2x400.43 KUETHEk DISTRIBUTING INVENTORY
2003.99 # - -- - - --
50 -4630- 822 -82 STA
50- 4632- 842 -84 STA
i
353315
12/13/77
49.35
FALLON
MITCH
SALARY
10- 4120-520-52
49. 35 *
4?
353324
12/09/77
2000.00
LOGIS
CLASS 2 CHG LOGIS
353324
12./C9/77__
298.00-
LOGIS
EQUIPT RENTAL
353324
12/14/77
272.00
LGGIS
,.
EOUIPT RENTAL
LAWSGN
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 855407 6828
353317
12/09/77
41.86
,D
353317
12/09/77
88.01
LAWSCN
PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56 855405 6830
736.81
353317
12/09/77
77.45
LAWSCN
PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
20- 4504- 646 -64 855406 6827
FINANCIAL
353324
207.32 #
571.39
LOGIS
- - - --
- -- -- -
i
4?
353324
12/09/77
2000.00
LOGIS
CLASS 2 CHG LOGIS
353324
12./C9/77__
298.00-
LOGIS
EQUIPT RENTAL
353324
12/14/77
272.00
LGGIS
,.
EOUIPT RENTAL
353324
12/14/77
274.50
LOGIS
PAY ROLL
353324
12/09//7_
_ 280.80 _
LOGIS
PAYRULL
353324
12/05/77
736.81
LGGIS
_ _ ____________
FINANCIAL
353324
12/14/77
717.00
LOGIS
FINANCIAL
353324
12/14/77
571.39
LOGIS
WATER
!
353324
12/0;/77
406.70
LUG1S - - --
- MAZER - - - - - --
•
353324
12109/77
406.70
LGGIS
SERER
353324
12/14/77
571.38
LJGIS
SERER
6,535.28 #
--
®
353341
12/13/77
8.73
f•t L I
SCREWS 6 TAPE
10- 4200 - 500 -50 733
10- 4226 - 160 -16 712
10- 4226- 160 -16 748
10- 4228- 160 -16 748
10- 4228 - 160 -16 712
10- 4230 - 160 -16 712
10- 4230 - 160 -16 748
30- 4232- 780-78 STA
30- 4232 - 780 -78 712
40- 4232 - 800 -80 712
40- 4232 - 800-80 STA
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
** *-CKS
* ** -CKS
10- 4504 - 560 -56 127664
1977 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 19 77
PAGE 13
CHECK NO.
-
DATE
-___ _ —_ — —
AMOUNT _
— — VENDOk
ITEM DESCRIPTION - _______-
_ACCCUNTNO. IN_V.__p _P.O. -_, #_
MESSAGE
8.73
448.40
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
BRUUMS
10- 4534- 310-30
330 6859
353342
121 09/77
'y
448.40
* * * —CKS—
.•.
353344
12/13/77
58.32
MEU.OXYGEN E EQUIP C
COMP AIR
10- 4274 - 449 -44
247949
353344
12/14/77
15.2'/
MEU.OXYGEN G EQUIP C
OXYGEN
10- 4510-440 -44
248736
i
73.61
*tug **
* ** —CKS
353350
12/13/77
- - - -
11.00 --
MILLER DAVIS COMPANY
-- - --
FORMS
10- 4600 - 200-20
1077.11 6891
--- - - --
11.00
.Ilk
w
* ** —CKS
353354
12/14/77
273.31
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
10- 4254- 446 -44
STA
12/14/77
158.59
MINNEAPOLIS_ GAS CO
HEAT
10- 4254 - 520 -52
STA
_353354
353354
12/14/77
lt02l.U,)
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
_
10- 4254- 540-54
STA
353354
12/14/77
472.64
MINNEAPCLIS GAS CO
HEAT
20- 4254 - 646 -64
.
353354
12/14/77
2.56
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
26- 4254- 689 -68
STA
353354
12/14/77
177.61
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
27- 4254 - 661 -66
STA
W3
353354
12/14/77
2,319.77
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
28- 4254- 708 -70
-
_353354
12/14/77
622.08
_MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
30-4254- 782 -78
—
3531354
12/14/77
67.61
MINNFAPCL.IS GAS CO
HEAT
40- 4254 - 801 -80
:. ?
353354
12114/77
77.59
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
HEAT
50- 4254 - 821 -82
=
353354
12/14/77
17.82
MINNEAPOtIS GAS CO
HEAT
50- 4254- 841 -84
— -- -
353354
- -
12/14/71
- --
126.07
-
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
- - -- -- - - - - - -- --
HEAT
50 -4254- 861 -86
- - - -- ---------------
353354
12/14/77
L,603.03
MINNEAPOLIS GAS CO
REPLACE GAS SERVICE
60- 1300- 010 -07
13846
6,939.77
* ** —CKS
72.00
MINNESOTA BLUEPRINT
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 260 -26
38574
353356
12/09/77
72.00
** *pax
* ** —CKS
353358
12/14/77
90.00
3M ALARM SERVICE
ALARM SERV
- - - - - --
50- 4304 - 821 -82
HGF206
90.00
*
- -- _
_. -_ - --
353359
12/09/77
---------
- - - - -- 19.53
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS --
27-4540- 662 -66
7957
19.53
*
35336.0
12/09/7715.00
- -— MIN - NESOTA WANNER- .__ -_. -__ _.
POLE REPAIR,
10- 4248- 322 -30
41509_
353360
12/09/77
7.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
HOSE REPAIR
20- 4248- 646 -64
41537
_
353360
12/09/77
58.63
MINNESOTA WAPMNER
FCG NOZZLE
20 -4540- 646 -64
41495
81.13
$
* * *_ CK5
353362
12/13/77
132.88
MODEL STONE COMPANY
FOOTING
24 -1444- 000 -00
64154
•
12/13/77 65.40
65.40
MOHR MAPCIA
12/12/77
27.00
NATL BUSHING
G PARTS
12112171
40.50
107 CIYY
OF EDINA
***-CKS
CHECK REGISTER
10-4504-560-56
4019
12/14/77
30.00
NORTHWESTEPN
BELL
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
12/14/77
353362
12/14/77
281.33
MODEL STONE COMPANY
70.45
353362
12/13/77
103.66
MODEL STONE COMPANY
NUR1H6ES1EkN
BELL
12/14/77
517.87.*
N'GkIHaESTERN
BELL
353363
12/13/77
188.39
MUNARCH MAKKING SYST
12/14/71
16.29
NGKTHkESTEkN
188.39
12/14/77
21.60
NORTHhESTEFN
BELL
12/14/77
47.25
N(JkThVESTFkN
BELL
12/14/77
52.43
NCRTHVNFSTEKN
3ELL
353365
12/14/77
200.00
BERT MERFELD
29969.33
200.00
353370
12/14/77
491.40
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
491.40
353379
12/14/77
23.00
__METRO FONE COMM
23.60
j
353361
12/09/77
19.50
MPLS STAR TR13UNE
353381 -12./0-9/77---
29.25MPL.S
STAR TR13UNE
46.15
12/13/77 65.40
65.40
MOHR MAPCIA
12/12/77
27.00
NATL BUSHING
G PARTS
12112171
40.50
NATL BUSHING
& PARTS
***-CKS
67.50
10-4504-560-56
4019
12/14/77
30.00
NORTHWESTEPN
BELL
12/14/77
2,234.69
NORTHIAESTERN
BELL
12/14/77
- 41. 55
___._NGPTh6ESTFRN
BELL
12/14/77
70.45
NORTH6ESTERN
SELL
12/14/77
26.65
NUR1H6ES1EkN
BELL
12/14/77
217.21
N'GkIHaESTERN
BELL
12/14/77
169.21
NORTH1%ESTERN
BELL
12/14/71
16.29
NGKTHkESTEkN
BELL
12/14/77
21.60
NORTHhESTEFN
BELL
12/14/77
47.25
N(JkThVESTFkN
BELL
12/14/77
52.43
NCRTHVNFSTEKN
3ELL
12/14/77
42.00
NO R T H, 6 E S T E k N
BELL
29969.33
L2 19 77 PAGE 14
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCCUNTNO. INV.. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
STONE 24-1444-000-00 14306
SUPPLIES 24-1452-000-00 10528
IMPRINTER 50-4504-842-84 855621 6887__
POLICE SER NOV DEC 10-4100-420-42
***-CKS
POPCORN G SUPPLIES 28-4624-704-70 54522
***-CKS
EQUIPT RENTAL 1653 10-4226-420-42 35316
_
* **-C KS
AD PARK DEPT 20-4212-600-60 362855
FORESTRY AIDE AD _362856-
***-CKS
MILEAGE OCT NOV
20-4208-600-60
***-CKS
SUPPLIES
10-4504-560-56
4019
PARTS
10-4620-560-56
41887 6585
***-CKS
TELEPHONE
10-4256-460-46
STA
TELEPHONE
10-4256-510-51
STA
TELEPHONE
20-4256-62.2 -62
STA
TELEPHONE
20-4256-628-62
STA
TELEPHONE
26-4256-689-68
STA
TELEPHONE
27-4256-661-66
STA
TELEPHUNE
28-4256 -708-70
STA
TELEPHONE
29-4256-721-72
STA
TELEPHONE
30-4256-782-78
STA
TELEPHUNE
50-4256-821 -82
SIA
TELEPHONE
50-4256-841-84
STA
TELEPHONE
50-4256-861-86
STA
2,796.38
353402 12/09/77 70.85 NOTT COMPANY HOSE
353406 12/13/77 9.40 NATL TE=MP CONTROL THERMO
9.40 #
353411 12/09/77 1.93 _ FIRE PRO ASSOC -_ CHRISTMAS_ CHECK
353428
12/14/77
1.93 $
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARUS
10- 4600- 120 -12
7847
353428
12/14/77
-_ 5.07__
PAUL_-FOSS
PRINTING_ _
BUSINESS
1977 CITY
OF EDINA
97.55
CHECK REGISTER
INVENTORY
-
12 19 77 PAGE 15
12/13/77 _
19007.10
BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
CARDS
353416
12/13/77
896.62
U.A. BRINK BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
CHECK NO.
DATE
AM-OUNT
VENDOR
BUSINESS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
353417
353397
12/12/77
57.78
NORTHWESTERN
GRAVEL
SAND
30- 4522 - 783 -78
5121
CARDS
353397
12112177
577.85
NORTHWESTERN
GRAVEL
SAND
30- 4522 - 783 -78
5121
PRINTING
353397
12112177
57.78-
NURTHWESTERN
GRAVEL
SAND
30- 4522 - 783 -78
5121
PAPER SUPPLY CO INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES_
PRINTING
577.85
14.70
7780
140.60 #
-
* ** -CKS
353429
12/13/77
3.3.45
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
5U- 4632- 822 -82
STA
353429
12/13/77 - _
353400
12/14/77
29796.38
NORTHWESTERN
TIRE CO
TIRES S TUBES
10- 4616- 560 -56
STA
2,796.38
353402 12/09/77 70.85 NOTT COMPANY HOSE
353406 12/13/77 9.40 NATL TE=MP CONTROL THERMO
9.40 #
353411 12/09/77 1.93 _ FIRE PRO ASSOC -_ CHRISTMAS_ CHECK
20- 4556 - 647 -64 873295 6912
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
50- 4540-821-82 M54079 6883
* ** -CKS
10 -4650- 440 -44 773350_- __,____
- - - - - - -- - - - -- ------ - - - * ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82 STA
50- 4630- 842 -64 STA
50- 4630 - 862 -86 STA — -
10- 4504 - 440 -44 15698 6894
** *-CKS
20- 4588 - 624 - 62_14328 -_6860
# * * -C KS.
353428
12/14/77
1.93 $
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARUS
10- 4600- 120 -12
7847
353428
12/14/77
-_ 5.07__
PAUL_-FOSS
PRINTING_ _
BUSINESS
353416
12/13/77
97.55
O.A.BRINK BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
-
3- 53.416
12/13/77 _
19007.10
BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
CARDS
353416
12/13/77
896.62
U.A. BRINK BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
_ .
PAUL
FOSS
2,001.27
BUSINESS
CARDS
10 -4E00- 420 -42
353417
12/09/77
246.00
OFFSET PRINTING
FIRE REPORTS
a
FUSS
PRINTING
246.00
CARDS
10 -4600- 490-49
7847
353428
12/14/77
10.12
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARDS
20 -4600- 600 -60
7847
353426
1.2/14/77
- - -_ 14.70-
-
PAPER SUPPLY CO INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES_
PRINTING
PATRONS CARDS
14.70
7780
140.60 #
353429
20- 4556 - 647 -64 873295 6912
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
50- 4540-821-82 M54079 6883
* ** -CKS
10 -4650- 440 -44 773350_- __,____
- - - - - - -- - - - -- ------ - - - * ** -CKS
50- 4630- 822 -82 STA
50- 4630- 842 -64 STA
50- 4630 - 862 -86 STA — -
10- 4504 - 440 -44 15698 6894
** *-CKS
20- 4588 - 624 - 62_14328 -_6860
# * * -C KS.
353428
12/14/77
5.06
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARUS
10- 4600- 120 -12
7847
353428
12/14/77
-_ 5.07__
PAUL_-FOSS
PRINTING_ _
BUSINESS
CARDS
10- 4600- 140 -14
7847
353428
12/14/77
10.12
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARDS
10 -4600- 200 -20
7847
353429
12/14/77
30.36
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARDS
10 -4E00- 420 -42
7847
35342.8
12/14/77
-- - 10.12_
_PAUL
FUSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARDS
10 -4600- 490-49
7847
353428
12/14/77
10.12
PAUL
FOSS
PRINTING
BUSINESS
CARDS
20 -4600- 600 -60
7847
353428
12/09/77
69.75
PAUL
FUSS
PRINTING
PATRONS CARDS
27- 4600 - 660 -66
7780
140.60 #
353429
12/13/77
3.3.45
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
5U- 4632- 822 -82
STA
353429
12/13/77 - _
62.70 _
PEPS[
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
STA
353429
12/13/77
71.10
PEPSI
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
_ _______
50- 4632- 862 -86
SIA
1477 CIfY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 19 77
PAGE 16
Q
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. #
MESSAGE
sq?
167.25
#
----- - - - - --
-- -***-CKS
--
- - -
- -- -
* * ** **
—
-- -- - - --
12/13/77 __
- -
___ _ 1,028.60
--
PUHLE _SALES INC - -- -
INVENTORY _ _ -
_ 50- 4630- 822 -82
- STA -
- - - - -- - - —
_353433
353433
12/13/77
4,535.10
POHLE SALES INC
INVENTORY
50 -4630- 842 -84
STA
353433
12/13/77
39956.81
PUHLE SALES INC
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 862 -86
STA
9,520.51
* ** -CKS
353436
12/13/77
20.70
PUMP L METER SERVICE
REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
49966
6881
353436
12/13/77
79.75
PUMP 6 METER SERVICE
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
49966
6881
100.45
353437
12/14/77
31.90
BARBARA PETERSON
PETTY CASH
23 -1C30- 000 -00
31.90
* * * ***
* ** -CKS
353441
12/09/77
299.64
PAKO FILMSHOPS
PHOTO.SUPPLIES
10-4508-420 -42
STA
299.84
* ** -CKS
4
353445
12/13/77
72.61
PAPER CALMENSON CO
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 318 -30
463363
6914______________
353445
12113/77
32.38
PAPER CALMENSON CO
SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 318 -30
463364
6915
,al
104.99
-- - - - - -- -- - - -- -- - --
- -- ------
- - - * ** -CKS - --
- - - --
-
353447
12/12_/_77_,__________
__ _ 50.80
__
P_ENN__A_UTO PLAZA __ - _
PARTS _ - -_10-
4620 - 560 -56 --
STA__-
____-
50.80
__- __ - -___
*$ ** #*
* ** -CKS
�s
35345J
12/13/77
52.05
P 8 E
PART
10- 4620 - 560 -56
77572
6955
52.05
#
-CKS
353452
12/09/77
4.43
QUICK SERV BATTERY
FRAM
10 -4620- 560 -56
1339
6741
4.43
- -'** *_CKS - --
- -- --- -
-- - --
- -
3
353463
12/13/77.
963.55
REX -DIST_
INVENTORY
STA._
353463
12/13/77
2,725.94
REX D[ST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
STA
:y
353463
12/13/77
19719.70
REX DIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
STA
353463
12/13/77 -
_ _ 116.65-
REX_DIST- .- _
-
INVENTORY
4632- 862 -86
59525.84
*
__
-50-
-STA__
353464
12_/09/77_ _._
—_ - _ 147.60
_
_- _P_EY_NO_ LDS-- _WELD.SUPPLY
WELDING SUPPLIES- _- _-
___l0- 4610 - 560 -56
STA
147.60
e
cl 1977 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 12 19 77 PAGE 17
CHECK NO. — DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTIGN -----AE;CCL;NT- NO. INV.- N P.O. # MESSAGE
r * * t, * * ***-CKS
35346_712i13/ 77 82.00 ROYAL BEVERAGE CO INVENTORY 50-4630-e22-82 STA
353467 12/13/77 984.05 ROYAL BEVERAGE CO INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 STA
3534-6712 12/13/77 84. 70. --- -----ROYAL - BEVERAGE CO INVENTORY _50-4630-862-86 STA
1,350.75
"D
353470 12/14/77 50.00 ROCKWELL MD C.V. MED SERV NOV DEC
5 0. 0 0 -
10-4100-481-48
353502 12/12/77 108.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS
108.06
50-4632-822-82 STA
50-4632-842-84 STA
50-4632-862-86 -STA
50-4630-822-82 STA
50-4630-842-84 STA
50-4630-862-86 STA
***-CKS
***-CKS
***-CKS
10-4248-5160-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
***-CKS
***-CKS
353413
12/13/77
64.40
R.E. MOONEY E ASSOC.
ENAMEL
12/13/77
30-4544-784-78
7886 6857
353489
12/13/77
152.90
64.40
BOTTLING CO
INVENTORY
353489
12/13/77 - --
189.00--SEVEN-UP-BOTTLING
CO
INVENTORY
441.10
***-CKS
353480
_277.09
RAZIDLO _ _ADVERTISING
LIQUOR
AD
50-4214-822-82
S. TA
1t049.75
3534do
12/14/77
277.08
RAZIDLO ADVERTISING
LIQUOR
AD
50-4214-842-84
SOUTHSIDE
DIST COINC
353480
12/14/77
277.08
RAZIDLO ADVERTISING
LIQUOR
AD
50-4214-862-86
INVENTORY
831.25
353481
12/12/77
667.70
ST REGIS PAPER CO
GUARD
RAIL MATER
10-4546-340-30
23928 6848
_667.70
353501
12/12/77
353482
12/14/77
14.83
SATELLITE INDUSTRIES
SERV DEC
35350_1_12/12i_77___
27-4200-662-66
74463
AUTO ELEC.
PARTS
355.25
353502 12/12/77 108.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS
108.06
50-4632-822-82 STA
50-4632-842-84 STA
50-4632-862-86 -STA
50-4630-822-82 STA
50-4630-842-84 STA
50-4630-862-86 STA
***-CKS
***-CKS
***-CKS
10-4248-5160-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
***-CKS
SEVEN-UP
BOTTLING CO
INVENTORY
353489
12/13/77
99.20
353489
12/13/77
152.90
SEVEN-UP
BOTTLING CO
INVENTORY
353489
12/13/77 - --
189.00--SEVEN-UP-BOTTLING
CO
INVENTORY
441.10
353493
I2/13/77
1t049.75
SOUTHSICE
DIST COINC
INVENTORY
353493
12/13/77
3,399.92
SOUTHSIDE
DIST COINC
INVENTORY
353493
12/13/77
405.60
SOUTHSIOE
DIST COINC
INVENTORY
4,855.27
353501
12/12/77
— 280.51_—
SUBURBAN
AUTO ELEC.
REPAIRS
35350_1_12/12i_77___
74.74_SUBURBAN'
AUTO ELEC.
PARTS
355.25
353502 12/12/77 108.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PARTS
108.06
50-4632-822-82 STA
50-4632-842-84 STA
50-4632-862-86 -STA
50-4630-822-82 STA
50-4630-842-84 STA
50-4630-862-86 STA
***-CKS
***-CKS
***-CKS
10-4248-5160-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
10-4620-560-56 STA
***-CKS
'S✓
f
1 §77 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT
t 353508 12/13/77 2.66
2.66 #
353542 12/13/77
353545 _ 1:- /1L/77
353545 1[/14/77
353545 12/14/77
- - -17.45
--
17.45
#
70.00_____
12/12/77
353511
10- 4120- 490 -49 -
-_ 11.31
DAIRY
11.31
#
- -- __- 30.00
_
30.00
#
2,962.93
353518_
12_/14/77___ _
TERRACE
137.05
353519
12/09/77
#
-- TERRACE
AUTO
SUPPLY
353520
12/12/77_ -
- --
353522
12/13/77
3_53522
12/13/77
353522
12/G9/77 --
..r
353527
1-2/09/77
_353528 -
-- 12/12/77 - - - -
353523
--
12/12/ 77
353528
12112/77
353526
12/12/77
353533
12/14/77
353542 12/13/77
353545 _ 1:- /1L/77
353545 1[/14/77
353545 12/14/77
- - -17.45
--
17.45
#
70.00_____
SCOFIELC_
70.00
10- 4120- 490 -49 -
-_ 11.31
DAIRY
11.31
#
- -- __- 30.00
_
30.00
#
2,962.93
PARTS
1,031.20
TERRACE
137.05
SUPPLY
4,131.18
#
CHECK REGISTER
__VENDOR_- _ ITEM DESCRIPTION__
SI PAUL BOCK SUPPLIES
12 19 77 PAGE 18
ACCOUNT INV._ 9 P.O._ #_- MESSAGE_
10- 4504 - 440-44 86379
* ** -CKS
SOUTHERN
VACUUM SERV
VACUUM PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 MK5581
BERNADINE-
SCOFIELC_
SALARY - _
10- 4120- 490 -49 -
SUPERIOR
DAIRY
GRILL SUPPLIES
27- 4624 - 664 -66 STA -
ST LOLIS
PARK MED
EXAM LAWSON
10- 4246- 440 -44 001349
STANDARD OIL GAS
STANDARD OIL _ _ _ GAS _
STANDARD OIL GASOLINE F 0
31.38
TEAM ELECTRONICS
PARTS
STA
* ** -CKS
_27. 60_
_TERRACE__AUTO
-- 10 -4248- 446 -44
SUPPLY
PARTS ___ __
52.40
TERRACE
AUTO
SUPPLY
PARTS
6.22
TERRACE
AUTO
SUPPLY
PARTS
9.32 --
-- TERRACE
AUTO
SUPPLY
PARTS
95.54 #
- --
266.20 THE MCGUL CORP WS 163
266. 20 #
6,084.90
6,084.90 #
_ 25.00 _
40.00
4.50
69. 50 #
**-CKS
10- 4612- 560-56 8266 6941
___ 10- 4612- 560 -56 8265 ___._6941_._____
10- 4612 - 560-56 97975 6927
- - - - -- - - -------- - - - - -- - * ** -CKS
10- 4620- 560-56 STA
10- 4620 - 560-56 54474 _ 6836
10- 4620- 560 -56 53371 6733
10- 4620- 560 -56 54467 6733
10 -462C- 560 -56 51649 6776
* ** -CKS
28- 4564 - 707 -70 61759 6968
* ** -CKS
THORPE 01ST
INVENTORY
50- 4630-862 -86
STA
* ** -CKS
-TWIN CT Y GARAGE COOR
ADJUST DOOR _
-- 10 -4248- 446 -44
20041-
TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR
REPAIR LOCK
28- 4248 - 708 -70
20214 6802
TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR
REPAIR PARTS
28- 4540 - 708 -70
20214 6802
* ** -CKS
161.37 VALLEY IND PROPANE PROPANE 28-4612-707-70 4104
161.37
74.56
CHECK REGISTER
CLASS 5
28.13
12 19
77
PAGE 19
1477 CItY
OF EDINA
ITEM DESCRIPTION ______ACCOUN.T'NO._
INV.__#__P..O. -9 -MESSAGE------
89.50
CHECK NO.
DATE
10-4248-560-56
353550
12/09/77
79.79
353550
12/09/77
REPAIR PARTS--------
10-4540-560-56
WTA
586.63 *
.
145.95
353554
12/12/77
353554
12/12/77
353554
12/12/77
***-CKS
115.86
UNIVERSAL MATCH
PATCHES
353561
12/09/77
5819
1�53561_12/09/77
UNIVERSAL MATCH
MATCHES
50-4514-842-84
113907
5819
_115.86
115.87
353562
12/13/77
50-4514-862-66
113907
5819
,347.59
353565
12/09/77
353569
12/09/77
- 96.2 5
_VALLFY EQUIPMENT CO
REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
353574
12/14/77
353574
12/14/77
PART
353574
12/14/77
6503
137.06
353579
12/12/77
134.20
353579
12/12/77
10-4504-560-56
353579
12/1.2/ 77
353579
12/12/77
353582
12/12/77
- - --
***-CKS
5.09
Vl-,K-I-NG-INDUSTRL CTR------
SAFETY EQUIPI`
353586
12/09/77
5.09
161.37 VALLEY IND PROPANE PROPANE 28-4612-707-70 4104
161.37
74.56
CHECK REGISTER
CLASS 5
28.13
12 19
77
PAGE 19
AMUUNT -
-VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION ______ACCOUN.T'NO._
INV.__#__P..O. -9 -MESSAGE------
89.50
TISDEL STANDARD
REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
STA
SUPPLIES____._____
79.79
56.45
TISDEL STANDARD._
REPAIR PARTS--------
10-4540-560-56
WTA
586.63 *
.
145.95
***-CKS
115.86
UNIVERSAL MATCH
PATCHES
50-4514-822-82
113907
5819
UNIVERSAL MATCH
MATCHES
50-4514-842-84
113907
5819
_115.86
115.87
UNIVERSAL MATCH
MATCHES
50-4514-862-66
113907
5819
,347.59
***-CKS
- 96.2 5
_VALLFY EQUIPMENT CO
REPAIRS
10-4248-560-56
10553
-
40.81
VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO
PART
10-4620-560-56
40294
6503
137.06
134.20
VAN WATERS & ROGERS
WIPE OUT
10-4504-560-56
108189
6767
134.20
- - --
***-CKS
5.09
Vl-,K-I-NG-INDUSTRL CTR------
SAFETY EQUIPI`
10-4642-301.--3095086---69-18---------,---.-
5.09
161.37 VALLEY IND PROPANE PROPANE 28-4612-707-70 4104
161.37
74.56
W.G. PEARSON INC
CLASS 5
28.13
W.G. PEARSON INC
CLASS 5
28-4504-708-70
-W.G..-PEARSON INC
CLASS 5
696.82
55.71
WILLIAMS STEEL-HDWE
SUPPLIES
409.97 -_-WILLIAMS
STEEL-HOWE
SUPPLIES____._____
79.79
WILLIAMS STEEL-HOWE
SUPPLIES
41.16
WILLIAMS STEEL-HDWE
SUPPLIES
586.63 *
.
.
10-4532-301-30 STA
20-4532-642-64 STA
30-4532-783-78 STA
10-4504-301-30
STA
10-4504-560-56
STA
20-4504-646-64
S-TA
28-4504-708-70
STA
* **-C KS
***-CKS
**--C KS
* **-C KS
299.20 W.GORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 27-4612-662-66
299.20
***-CKS
34.63_________W_.W_GPAINGER INC REPAIR PARIS 40-4540-801-80 2724816877
34.63 *
~~
--' -
1977 czTv OF soIm» CHECK nsazaxsn
CHECK NO. DATE ~~/ xnoow uVxL-----'_- zTem osscnIpTKon
12 x* 77 PAGE
ACCOVNT ]Vu.__lmu._�-PsO~ w.wESGuGa________
***-CmS �
353703
121 ��f'-------'--'--'944.bo
c*AN-�D�^i'oxi�snxs� '
punmxzume -- -------
23-1330-000-00
'SxA----6539-'
-- -'-----
e94.00
*
-------'---
ar.no
*Axo- swTsm
5ocoImG SHELL . ST
60-1 -300-209 -n*uTA-----'---------------
353704
87.35
*
�
/'
-15�. n0
_MEo-bFnxzoe-''
KxrL xsG EXAM ----------'10-42n2�4ao-������-----'-----------------'
.J
z*.00
*
0 '9��7----------it872.�8
--------Axv
ES -'C -uwT INC -'
1,47sn REPAIR __________30-4248-783-78'
4_63f--'--'--'----------'--'
353706
12/09v77
259.02
*AYES Cowr INC
scws* nsp«Ip
40-4248-e0 1-8 0
+aza
10r71r7____
____ 259.02
________,AyEScowT INC
hArsp oxsccmxsCx
60-13nn-070-10
4614
2,390.52
*
353707
12109177
15.00
__p.n n«nLc
p*ozo FOR coomcIL
10-450*-1*0-14
15.00
*
�
.
_353708 ______/2/0o/7r______�_____
3o.on_-_-__-Mm
S7A�E pxnp coIsFs
ousS
10-*204-+4u-+4��____________�__^_________
'
30.00
*
�
'-
�
_353I0912/09v71
--'-_-__-_
- 64.00
sowxKnHAm5sm _ _
-SALARY
10-*1*3_008-44__________________________
'
6*.00
*
_
^
/77 -_--__-_---_382.30
L__--_---yOuC*sK'ppmT
_
aowu pnxwTIms
63_2490-000-00
57028 ___________�__________
382.00
*
`./
/
_3 5�?\l______t
2vJa/7r________
_ fm.n1
��sysx� cYc�s
��_--__' -
u�px�� p�n�s __--
z�-�5*u_�rz-au
l��a�
/a7��
'
`
60.51
_
_-___,-___-__
--***_cwS____
:.
�J
353713
12/12/77
ez.»o
nonnoo
SALARY
23-4120-613-61
ea.»u��_-__-_-
_ -- '-- -_-
_-- ----
-- --'--------------------
------
`
soor��
za��z�7r
18.00
»msxzcAm CRAFTS
ooeS
23-420+-610-61
22515
1p,om
* -- -- -
---'------------
-----'-------------
--'-----�------
C�
3537L5
12/L2y77
24.51
nooT LowcLL CORP
pump ASSEMBLY
10-4540-520-52
clxeye
68+9
24.5
353716
12/12/77
15.00
mAoA
CAR :unos
lo-+so+-aVo-ao
STu
15,0
3*3717
12xe9/77
75.86
CRYSTAL nrns
pxnrs
10-*620-560-56
57e12
6*65
/75.86�*
_-___--
- �' - ----
---'-----��----
-------
---
~y
353716
12/09x77
14.80
pcmT*ooSe.SIsmS
posrsnS
10-4510-4*0-*+
SnA
4.80
* __---_'-- --
--------'--------------------------
-a
353719
12/12f77
2.00-
J«suw xAnLsOm
cLsnIcxL pss
10-3350-000-00
2/12/77___-____--_-_'
17.00
__-JAspN_cAxLuow
xmewx esFumo ________
an-o4ls-ono-mo.________�________________
15.00
*
le
f977'CfTY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12 19
77 PAGE 21
CHECK NO.
DATE
AML'UNT_
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE
353720
12/12/77
180.00
UNIY GF MINN
REG FEES
10- 4202 - 490-49
180.00
#
rP
353721
12/12/77
88.90
SOUTHERN AMBULANCE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440-44
18510
6852
'
353722
12/09/77
37.92
HARRIsnN HOUSE
GLASSES
50- 4504 - 842 -84
334579
6906
37.9.2
#
.>
353723
12/09/77
70.00
METRO CLEANING
CARPET CLEANING
50- 4236- 841 -84
STA
70. 00
#
353724
12/09/77
60.00
N G F
DUES VALLIERE
27- 4204 - 660 -66
6527
60.00
353725
12/09/77
141.21
1 C 0 A
HEATING OIL
10 -4254- 540-54
636812
141.21
�
353726
12/09/77
213.47
NANCY RUST
SALARY
10-4120- 120 -12
213.47
353727
12/09/77
49.00
BROWNING FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
23- 4250 - 611 -61
204902
49.00
#
}
353728
12/09/77
12.00
CRAIG SVtiANSON
REIM EXPENSE
10- 4202- 460 -46
353729
12113177
868.22
VICTOR CARLSON
FINAL S 22
60-2040- 000 -00
_
353729
12/13/77
2,675.59
VICTOR CARLSON
FINAL S 21
60- 2040 - 000 -00___
-
353729
12/13/77
8,714.98
VICTOR CARLSON
FINAL 77 8
60 -2C40- 000 -00
—
'
12, 258.79
#
-
353730
12/13/77
10,085.71
PETER LAMETTI CONST
FINAL WM 318
60- 2040 - 000 -00
d?
353730
12/13/77
10,502.07
PETER LAMETTI CONST
FINAL WM 320
60- 2040 - 000 -00
r
353730
12/13/71
- -- --
573.85
_ PEI- ER - LAMETTI CONST
FINAL WM 319B_ _ ___60-2040-000-00
_
_-60- 2040 - 000 -00
21,162:63
353731
12/13/77
19.92
SMITH_
MILEAGE NOV GEC
20 -4208- 600 -60___
19.92
353732
12/13/77
60. 00
R_P- A __.
MEMBERSHIPS_ _ — ________20-
4202- 600-60_STA__
--
60.00
__
353733
12- /13_/_77 _
___76.50
. -_ __
REFUND PERMTI723455 -_.___
10- 3110- 000-- 00___________
76.50
353734
12/14/77_
.-- -___ -- 135.00_
CORNER _ MARKING _- _
LEE TODD PLAGUE
20- 4504- 646 -64
426886510-
i
353734
12/14/77
93.15
CORNER MARKING
RUN BUEHLER PLAQUE
20- 4504 - 646 -64
42688
___,., —�
6510
353734
12/14/77
108.00
CUKAEk MARKING
MARE FOSS PLAQUE
23- 4504- 612-61
42688
6510
336.15
353735
12/14/77
2.13.99
LUBINS PINK SUPPLY
BLUE ICE PAINT
20- 4544 - 647 -64
3395
6850
353735
12/14/77
213.99
LUBlNS RINK SUPPLY
RED ICE PAINT
28- 4544 - 707 -70
3 39 5
6890
427.98
: --
-
e
1 "977`CPTY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
12
19 77 PAGE 22
CHECK IND.
DATE
A,_40UNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO INV. # P.O.
i1 MESSAGE
�j
353736
12/14/71
2.00-
JOHN RYAN
CLERICAL
10- 3350 - 000 -00
353736
12/14/77
17.00
JOtIN RYAN
ARENA REFUND
28- 3415 - 000-00
15.00
353737
12/13/77
1t410.50
W E G REHOEIN BROS
GARDEN PARK_
24- 1429 - 000 -00
STA
1,410.50
35'1738
12/13/77
20.70
BRO TEX
TOWELS
10- 4514- 328 -30
03187_6971
353738
12/13/77
13.80
BRO TEX
TUWELS
10- 4514 - 560 -56
03187
6971
i
353738
12113177
20.70
BRO TEX
TOWELS
20- 4514 - 646 -64
03187
6971
12/13/77
82.80
BRO TEX
TOWELS
23- 4514 - 612-61
03187
6971
_353738
3 53 73 8
_
12/13/77
20.70
BRO TEX
TOWELS
26- 4514- b89 -68
03187
6971
353738
12/13/77
20.70
BRO TEX
TOWELS
26- 4514 - 707 -70
03187
6971
353738
12/13/77
27.60
BRU TEX
TOWELS
40- 4514- 328 -30
03187
6971
2C7.00
Yz
- - -
- --
- --
353739
12/13/77
28.08
N W GRAPHIC SUPPLY
ART SUPPLIES
23 -1209- 000 -00
14611
28.08
�
-
- - --
--
-- - - - - --
35.3740
12/13/17
18.01
- -
MIDWAY IN_ D_____
-- - - - - -- -- --- -
SUPPLIES - - -- -
10- 4504 - 560 -56
58121
6743
18.01
353741
12/13/77
- -
24.15
COLOR TILE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
23- 4512 - 611 -61
31460
24.15
__
--
-- ---- - - - - -- _
y
-
353.742
1_2/13/77_
27. 75
__ _FLAHERTY _ECUIP CORP _
P.EPAIRS
10- 4246- 440 -44
5360
6948______
_
353742
12/13/77
3.05
FLAHEkTY EQUIP CORP
REPAIR PARTS
l0- 4540- 440 -44
5360
6948
_
30.80
353743
12/13/77
120.00
MPLS WELDERS SUPPLY
ARC WELDER
27- 4610- 662 -66
16674
6886
120.00
-
353744
12/13/77
21.00
LIBERTY TOOL
E9UIPT MAINT
30- 4274- 783 -78
21721
6893
R
21.00
353745
12/14/77
16.75
GRACE JOHNSON
SALARY
10- 4120 - 140-14
_.
16.75
353746
12/14/77
30.00
GOVNT TPN SERV
REG FEE G HUGHES
10- 4202 - 120 -12
141
-
30.00
#
353747
12/14/77
67.90
KELLY SERV
SERV S FISHER
20- 4200 - 600 -60
17547
-
,�
67.90
#
353748
12/14/77
161.32
HOWARD LAWN SPRINKLE
SPRINKLER REPAIR
60 -1300- 302 -02
STA
161.32
#
353749
I.D 4/77
44.00
CAVID BUSH
REIM EXPENSE
10- 4202 - 420 -42
44.00
#
353750
12/14/77
35.95
INTERSTATE SYSTEMS
BATTERY PACK
10- 4644- 420-42
9084
35.95
#
353751
12/14/77
619.30
GULDEN VALLEY FURN
FURNITURE
27 -1325- 000 -00
STA
®
'
r�
^
-
' 3
- -
12/14/77 1
124.60
h93,h7dcmTv
OF eoxnx
12/14/77 7
782.23
c*sco nsozaTsn
906.83 ��
3
353759 1
12/14v77 3
34.34
� 3
353759 �
CHECK NO.
DATE
4MPuNI-__
n_-_--'-
xrsm osuCR.IprIom__
� '
'-14/7Z_____________40.00 _
_
�
61*.30
*
-
353752
1a/1*/ 77
z.z�».00
-- ---------zr+,yas.z4 -
eoxCxsxT IwccnsoLL
cuzTIws eoGs
353752
12/14/77
2,+50.00
ooxcysxT IwssnsoLL
eLAoss
. P
Park ouuot. 2
29299.77
--�
-
�e.n�
s»srno
12m4m7
61,734.25
19735.36___
n s ccwux
p*x 1 77 12
-Arena 4
4,210.30
~�
Gun Range 1
16.2*
353754
12/14/77
19.2e2.86
---------'sovor r
p J JEoLxcxI
FINAL wm 299
Liquor Fund 2
ry,uaz.oa
o conn�roc��ornu� y
^3
353755
12m4v77
84.80
pxzwT s*op
^nTwoxn
353756
12m+/77
271.25
Lxsox RELATIONS INC
msoI^rxum mrG
-� 2 71.a5
zooFuou 382.00
�
nmo , �e�.00
-__
12 19 77 pAas 23
-10-4540-318-30 '131791'66*7 ''- --
10-4540-31e-30 z3L765 679*
'- -- ' ' ----- - - -''--'-----
60-2u40-000-00 snA
60-3040-000-00 SV4
10-4600-507-50 228* 6324
10-*200-140-14 STA
nosxmsss zwcsm7IvsS nspomo wxxsn 30-3525-000-00 121977
uosIwcus INCENTIVES uspuwo uswsn *0-356o-000-00
DR wILmncn *Awsom nspuwo wArsn 30-3525-000-00
D8_MxLDkeu H»wsow nspumo sskisn 40-35oo-ouu-oo
Fumo 10 TOTAL ' - - --'- -'---- -' '--- -''-----------------
pumo zu TOTAL
ruwo as zozxL _ Handwritten :ho,uo: 11546 turu
puwo 24 TOTAL
+unu a+ Io74L
_puwo 27 TOTAL
pomo 28 ror«L
powo 29 TOTAL
_powo so TOTAL
pumo 40 TOTAL
*omo oo TOTAL
puwu ao Tor«L
Fumo 63 TOTAL
TO7«L-_-_v
' 3
353750 1
12/14/77 1
124.60
. �
353758 1
12/14/77 7
782.23
906.83 ��
3
353759 1
12/14v77 3
34.34
� 3
353759 �
��}�/7l--__-_-- -
oo.00__
�
-- o
� '
'-14/7Z_____________40.00 _
_
�
40.00 *
-
� -
---
-- ---------zr+,yas.z4 -
--
z,vn6.9u
19511.97
. P
Park ouuot. 2
29299.77
--�
-
�e.n�
` G
- P
19735.36___
-Arena 4
4,210.30
~�
Gun Range 1
16.2*
Water Works 7
7°�zx.�u
---------'sovor r
ruou - '- -- -
- ' ---
z,1un.17
L
Liquor Fund 2
211.161.27
o conn�roc��ornu� y
y»,�+e.za
12 19 77 pAas 23
-10-4540-318-30 '131791'66*7 ''- --
10-4540-31e-30 z3L765 679*
'- -- ' ' ----- - - -''--'-----
60-2u40-000-00 snA
60-3040-000-00 SV4
10-4600-507-50 228* 6324
10-*200-140-14 STA
nosxmsss zwcsm7IvsS nspomo wxxsn 30-3525-000-00 121977
uosIwcus INCENTIVES uspuwo uswsn *0-356o-000-00
DR wILmncn *Awsom nspuwo wArsn 30-3525-000-00
D8_MxLDkeu H»wsow nspumo sskisn 40-35oo-ouu-oo
Fumo 10 TOTAL ' - - --'- -'---- -' '--- -''-----------------
pumo zu TOTAL
ruwo as zozxL _ Handwritten :ho,uo: 11546 turu
puwo 24 TOTAL
+unu a+ Io74L
_puwo 27 TOTAL
pomo 28 ror«L
powo 29 TOTAL
_powo so TOTAL
pumo 40 TOTAL
*omo oo TOTAL
puwu ao Tor«L
Fumo 63 TOTAL
TO7«L-_-_v
Fumo 10 TOTAL ' - - --'- -'---- -' '--- -''-----------------
pumo zu TOTAL
ruwo as zozxL _ Handwritten :ho,uo: 11546 turu
puwo 24 TOTAL
+unu a+ Io74L
_puwo 27 TOTAL
pomo 28 ror«L
powo 29 TOTAL
_powo so TOTAL
pumo 40 TOTAL
*omo oo TOTAL
puwu ao Tor«L
Fumo 63 TOTAL
TO7«L-_-_v
December 12, 1977
Mr. James VanValkenburg
City of Edina
4501 West 50th `street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
i
Re: 1777 Commmity Dovolopment Block Grant Funds
ii
Dear .Ji.n:
Prior cc^-_itmmcnt^ prevent my attendance at the 1ecember 19th City
Council meeting at which y, ,-u twill be considering reallocation of
the 1777 Comunity P--veloprroent Bloc: Grant Funds. However, I would
like to ur-e the transfer of ;;10,000.00 of the historic preservation
funds to the Iistoric Architoctural survey. This would increase funds
for this project to w15,000.00.
,shat was initially concelvIed of a:, a research project involving a
-� student or intern e•r -�loye ! on a te�^porary basis would be expanded
to e^rploy a prof ^s� ional con .ultant tc produce a co�prehensive survey
of the City to locate and document historic sites of local, state and
national significance.
The 'Heritage Pre ;ervation Boyd views the completed survey as a valuable
planning too! for not only the continuing activiti.e�; of our board but also
for the Clty Council, City rlarrang Commission, Building Inspector, ;developers,
realtors, bankers and privata citizens.
For the first times it would provide an overall i••iventcry of historic sites
within the community and permit our Board to Proceed with 1hJ7,torJc preflervation
effort in accordance with a comprehensive plan rather than on a piece meal
basis.
Harold Sand will be available to your meeting to answer any questions
you may have.
Sincerely yours,
MILD. : ?- DUNWODIF- s.: ?CH ITE'CTS -INC .
Foster W. Dunwiddie
FWD /lew,
cc: Xen Kosland
Harold Sand
EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 19 DECEMBER 1977
XXXKXXXJ,jXX� I.A.2. P -WM -331
Mrs. Remi L. Wrona, 5117 Scriver Road and Mrs. Niel Feinberg, 5101 Scriver Road
xampiaixEd explained that they were quite satisfied with their wells and did
not want to be assessed for connecting to the proposed watermain. Councilman Courtney
pointed out that many people in Edina are satisfied with their wells until a problem
arises, the City cannot respond quickly in
thoseg/ situations. Mrs. Wrona further explained that she had paid for the Blake Road
watermain and now was being asked to pay for another *� She felt that this is doublqA-:
taxation. Mr. Dunn reminded Mrs. Wrona that she had paid only for a trunk -4tiot a
lateral and that th�;,e =�� cc ecting to Blake Road or to the proposed Scriver
Road watermain, io Mr. Davis Taft, the proponent complained that
deleting lots along Scriver Road would increase the costs to the proposed development
thus hurting his development plans.V'- Lynnae Nye, Eberhardt Corporation, pointed out
that the Taft Addition and the three western lots on Scriver Road would suffer econom-
i
ically if the other lots on Scriver Road are given the option of connecting to Blake
ke
Road.I,O r1�1 s. Nye then asked if the lots who have no option would receive a rebate if
the option lots choose to connect to Scriver Road. Mr. Dunn explained that XkR
a BxaxBmmmasxwigxidxhRxxkai tgRdxgfxakg city policy is to change the assessments if this
type of decision is made within a ixwx}Raxaxxawiaxaxxakxeaxymaxx three or four years.
I.A.1. & 3. P -SS -347 & P -BA -232
Mrs. Niel Feinberg, 5101 Scriver Road, explained that the storm sewer now serving
Scriver Road runs underneath her home. Mr. Dunn said that the Engineering Dept.
will work with Mrs. Feinberg regarding this matter.
t�
December 9, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City.Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner.
SUBJECT: Year III Community Development Block Grants
On May 13, 1977, the City, through.Hennepin-County, made application to HUD'for
$249,397 of the above - referenced funds. At that time, the City anticipated
allocating such funds in the following manner:
Low Income.Housing Rehabilitation
50th -and France Acquisition
Morningside
Park Improvements
Chowen Park
Parbury Park
Grandview Park
Diseased Tree Replacement
Historic Preservation
Tupa Park.
Grist Mill
Historical Survey
$ 39,397
$ 30,000
$135,500
$ 17,500
$ 1,000
$21,000
$ 5,000
$249,397
On August 1, 1977, HUD approved Edina's application with some modifications.
First, improvements to Parbury Park and Grandview Park were declared ineligible
activities in that they were not located in areas containing a significant
number of low and moderate income individuals. However, $17,500 remained
budgeted to the Parks Improvements Program even though Chowen Park was the only
remaining eligible site. Secondly, the Historic.Preservation Projects
(i-.e. Tupa Park and the Grist Mill) were similarly declared ineligible. The
$21,000 allocated for these projects was transferred into a category called
"contingency and /or unspecified local option activity."
Staff and other individuals have expended considerable effort in an attempt to
reverse HUD's decisions regarding the Parks and Historic Projects. However, it
now appears that the HUD decisions will stand and further efforts at reversal
would not be prudent. Therefore, I believe the City should promptly re- allocate
the $21,000 contingency and local option funds and a portion of the park improve -
ment funds to other eligible. programs.
Recommendation:
I recommend the following re- allocation of funds:.
1977 Application Rec. Re- allocation
Low Income Housing Rehabilitation $ 39,397 $ 60,397
Morningside $135,500 $135,500
Park Improvements $17,500 $ 6,500
,i
Memorandum - Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
Page 2
December 9, 1977
Recommendation (Continued):
1977 Application Rec. Re- allocation
Diseased
Trees
$
11000
$
9,000
Historic
Preservation
$
21,000
$
0
Historic
Survey
$
5,000
$
8,000
50th and
France
$
30,000
$
30,000
$
2499397
$
249,397
My reasons for such a re- allocation of funds.are.as follows:
1. Due to the ineligibility of Grandview and Parbury Parks, it appears unnecessary
to devote $17,500 to Chowen Park improvements. According to the 1977 Park
Department C.I.P., only $2,500 were to be used at Chowen Park for playground
equipment. Park staff has indicated that some additional improvements in
conjunction with the playground .equipment would-be desirable. Thus, I have
budgeted $6,500 for Chowen Park improvements.
2. Due to the incidence of Dutch elm disease and oak. wilt, Park staff has indicated .
a need for additional shade tree nursery stock. I thus have increased the
allocation for nursery stock to $9,000.
3. Heritage Preservation Board staff has indicated that the proposed historical
survey of the City may need additional funding to provide a more comprehensive
survey. I have thus added $3,000 for this project.
4. At present, $39,397 are allocated to the housing rehabilitation program. Of
this, $5,510 are budgeted for administrative costs. The City and First Edina
Bank work cooperatively in the management of the housing rehabilitation program.
First Edina Bank receives, at 6 -month intervals, $100,000 from the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency (M.H.F.A.) for the purpose of granting low- interest
rehabilitation loans to qualifying low income individuals. The City uses its
C.D. funds to augment such loans.
Presently, nearly all of the City's C.D. rehabilitation funds and First Edina
loan funds are committed and First Edina . is contemplating entering into
another 6 -month phase of funding from M.H.F.A. However, due to the cooperative
nature of the program, the bank is reluctant to begin another 6 -month phase of
the program unless the City also participates. In that the City's Year III
funds (i.e. $39,397) are committed and we will not receive Year IV funds
until August, 1978, we must re- allocate existing Year III funds to continue
the program for an additional six months. Based upon the number of inquiries
which the City and the bank have received concerning the program, we believe
there is sufficient demand to continue with another six month phase of the
housing rehabilitation program. Thus, I propose to re- allocate $21,000 into
this program.
December 9, 1977
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager, Mayor and City Council
FROM: Harold Sand
SUBJECT: 1977 Community Development Grants
The Heritage Preservation Board received City Council approval for the four
following 1977 C.D. projects:
1. Grange Hall Restoration $8,000
2. Cahill School.Restoration $8,000
3. Edina Mills Phase II $5,000
4. Historic /Architectural Survey $5,000
All of the projects except the survey were rejected by HUD because they did not
meet the "Maximum Feasible Priorities ".. They.are not located in census tracts
with a large enough percentage of low and moderate income families.
In light of the rejection of these projects, the Heritage.Preservation Board
has requested that a portion of the remaining unallocated funds be used to expand
the scope of the Historic Survey.
The original survey was conceived as a research project involving a student or
intern employed on a temporary basis. The expanded survey would employ a
professional consultant which improves credibility of documentation for
applications to the National Register of Historic Places. The attached outline
explains the scope of the survey in detail. The Board has requested permission
to interview consultants with a budget up to a maximum of $15,000.00,
HS:ks
Attach.
December 9, 1977
COMMUNITY SURVEY OF HISTORIC SITES
CITY OF EDINA
A. PURPOSE
Locate and document historic sites of local, state and national
significance through a comprehensive survey of the.City.
B. DOCUMENTARY RESEARCH
Conduct documentary research to develop historical profile of
the City and individual structures..
Documentary research will include:.
1. Review of existing pertinent documentary material, such as:
a. National Register of Historic Places nominations
b. Edina Historical Society's files
c. Edina Heritage Preservation Board's files
d. Minnesota State inventory of historic sites
2. Conduct original research in primary documentary resource
material on individual structures to determine function, owner-
ship, dates of construction and alterations.
Documentary material to be investigated will include:
a. Abstracts of Deeds.
b. Assessor's files
c. Historic maps (1860, 1874, 1879, 1885, 1890, 1898)
d. County Histories `
e. Newspaper accounts
f. City directories
g. Census records
h. Historic photographs
3. Conduct original research in primary documentary resource material
to develop historical profile of neighborhoods and potential
historic districts.
Community Survey of Historic Sites
Page Two
December 9, 1977
C. FIELD SURVEY
Conduct field survey_ of the City to locate.and identify
individual historic structures and potential historic districts.
Field survey results shall be recorded on appropriate survey
form similar to the Canadian Inventory of Historic Building
and shall include a photograph of the individual structures.
D. SELF GUIDED TOUR BROCHURE
Prepare narrative and graphic materials for self guided tour brochure
showing locations of historic structures and description of
individual sites.
E. FINAL REPORT
Prepare a final report setting forth methodology, findings and
recommendations as to historic districts, individual structures
and sites.
Final report shall include:
1. Historical profile of the City
2. Description, historical profile and significance
of historic districts, individual structures and
sites.
3. Recommendations as to National Register nominations of
historic districts,, individual structures and sites.
4. Recommendations as to rezoning to Heritage Preservation
District of historic districts, individual structures
and sites.
5. -Bibliography of major sources consulted.
ks
Mrs. Sumncr E. F h,itncy
4075 IV. 51st Street
r�inneaPolis, l�iinn. 55421• y
.z.w•w�. +.� l `ti �7 7 7
yt-,U-k 7-6 0.
Tj-
C" 41111 ;ul a4l
' 6 �,,� �IQ.e,.(,�y,��.;,�t.L.,,;r nv .B. -�,�.� Q(ta.��n . �•-V. ,.e
.. ce, �
/1.Q,,cc....1�.�t ,Q..� � 4A:�M -•� 'lac �.,n. x.:4,... �=- r••��.,�
�z� io �... �ry+•w., -..�.. Q. Wit,-- LAIA,
Mrs. Sumncr E.' Whitncy
4075 IV. 51st Strcet
Minneapolis, Minn. 55424
- �+�!I V•�- �-�• -� oil -Q•, �Yk,,,,,;,� �,1,,C,, 0�,,,•.i1 �•�,,�, �,,,�
ClAia
(k
N ",Xje
14
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment to Allow Laundries as a Principal Use
In C -1 Commercial Districts
Attached is a proposed ordinance amendment for the subjectmatter. The
proposed ordinance amendment allows laundries and dry cleaning establishments .
in C -1 zones without any specific size limitation on the facility. This
would remove the necessity of a variance for..The Edina Cleaners and
Launderers proposal. However, the amendment does require that such
laundry and dry cleaning establishments primarily serve persons living
or working in the nearby area.
For consistency, the subject amendment also deletes laundries as an allowable
use with size limitations in C -2 zones. In that all uses allowed in C -1 zones
are also allowed in C -2 zones, this section of the amendment removes a
potentially confusing and conflicting situation.
GLH:ks
12/16/77
Attach.
J Wk
ORDINANCE NO. 811 -A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE
(No. 811) TO CHANGE THE PRINCIPAL USES
ALLOWED IN COMMERCIAL DISTRICT C -1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Line 15 of Subparagraph (a) of District C -1 of
Paragraph 4 of Section 9 (Commercial District) of Ordinance No. 811 is
hereby amended as follows:
(ENTIRE 15: Laundries and dry cleaning establishments which primarily
PARAGRPAH provide personal services for persons living or working
NEW) in the nearby area.
Section 2. The permitted use shown at item number 26 of Subparagraph
(a) of District C -2 of Paragraph 4 of Section 9 (Commercial
District) of Ordinance No. 811 is hereby deleted in its
entirety.
REQUEST FOR' PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City. Council
FROM Robert Kojetin
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $1,000
DATE December 16, 1977
Material Description (General Specifications):
Major overhaul of Hi- Ranger- Tree Trimmer required to meet
certification.
Quotations /Bids:
Company
�. Northwest Tel -E -Lett (Labor $7,320)
(Material 2,752).
2.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$10,072.00
3. -
Recommendation: Recommend approval of quotat' n. Northwest is the sole source
of servie in Minne Tot
Sign t e _ Department
Finance Director's Endorsement.
The recommended bid is is not Q within the.amou t budge d for the purchase.
J. N. Dalen
Finance Director
MANAGER'S - ENDORSEMENT
` /1. I hereby concur with the recommendation of the department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nenneLn (nU5i
City Manager
Operating Income:
Service charges and penalties
Expenses:
Operating
Treatment and maintenance -Note A
Labor
Supplies
Repairs
k,ater
Power
Other
Vehicle Operation:
Allocated from equipment pool
Ac'm_nistrative and General:
Clerical and supervision
Audit
Supplies,, hospitalization and retirement
Bt.iIdipig rental
Professional services
Legal costs and other
TOTAL EXPENSES
Other Income:
Miscellaneous
Transfer from Joint Sewer District No. Fund
Provision for Depreciation
Note A - Paid' to Metropolitan Waste Control Commission
SEWER RENTAL FUND
ACTUAL AND PROJECTED INCOME AND EXPENSE STATEMENT
For Eight
Years Ending December
31, 1978
ACTUAL
PROJECTED
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
$158,736
$597,172
$646,445
$674,248
$690,389
$1,189,206
$19199,300
$1,343,000
$131,300
$36010582
$374,748
$481,795
$643,898
$
753,607
$
851,196
$1,122,202
52,086
51,984
49,866
56,002
60,921
65,181
78,332
84,600
11,948
11,521
10,153
149407
9,0.17
11,996
12,6.39
12,000
143,572
121,023
18,002
20,670
16,014
16,747
28,200
22,000
300
100
300
100
200
300
300
300
9,587
8,483
8,299
9,109
11,856
12,486
13,367
14,000
748
919
859
1,631
2,652
4,112
2,406
2,400
$2209541'
$445,612
4629227
583,714
$744,558
$
864,429
$
986,440
$1,257,502
5,880
6,840
7,200
7,620
8,460
8,880
9,960
10,800
$ 51,256
$ 6,748
$ 7,845
$ 8,795
$ 10,067
$
16,743
$
17,100
19,000
900
1,100
1,300
1,600
1,600
2,100
1,500
1,700
9,994
9,929
10,330
13,920
169140
19,140
20,700
27,600
780
900
900
960
1,020
1,200
1,320
1,560
18,073
4,841
4,105
4,455
4,725
6,439
6,640
9,000
3,319
132
586
349
800
800
$ 35,003
$ 23,518
$ 27,799
$ 29,862
$ 34,138
$
45,971
$
48,060
$ 59,660
$261,424
$4752970
$497,226
$6210196
$787,156
$
919,280
$1,0441,460
$1,327,962
$(102,688)
$121,202
$149,219
4 53,052
$(96,767)
$
269,926
$
154,840
$ 150,038
$ 4,139
$ 73
$ 42
$ 28
$ 975
2,564
7,878
20,896
$
21,487
$
21,000
$ 21,000
,139
2,637
42
7,906
21 871
.21,487
21,000
21,000
$(98,549)
$123,839
$149,261
$ 60,958
$(74,896)
. 291,413
$
175,840
$ 36,038
4,041
94,291
95,360
952060
99,122
100,577
102,000
104,000
$(102;590)
$ 29,548
$ 53,901
$(34,102)
$(174;018)
$.
130,836
$
73,840
$ (67;962)::.
Charges:
Treatment works -cost
Se-4er Service Area No.l
Treatment Works Reserve Capacity
Service Area No.l Reserve Capacity
TOTAL CHARGES
$366,088 $422,697 $495,265 $547,738 $680,396 $774,680 $866,767 $1,093,236 $5,246,867
Other credits or charges:
Current value credit $250,162
Debt payment credit 45,580
Final cost allocation -prior years
Total Credits or charges $295,742
70,346
Reserve capacity deferred charges
aad credits:
$ 56,339
44,340
100,67
322,01
$ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020
43,100 41,860 40,620
(43,859) (50,274) (63,799) (39,947) (50,229) (89,986
S 60.261 S 52.606 $ 37.840 S 21.073 $ 10,791 $ (28,966
,00- $495,132 $642,556 $753,607 $855,976 $1 9 122,
$ 672,621
215,500
(338, 094
$ 550,026
,696,841
Current year deferrment. charges
STATEMENT OF SEWER SERVICE
CHARGES
-0-
-0-
METROPOLITAN WASTE
CONTROL COMMISSION
-0-
1971
1972 1973
1974
1975 1976 1977 1978
TOTAL
$215,294
$242,347 $321,111
$406,841
$521,642 $602,716 $688,881 $ 898,567
$3,897,399
117,076
106,195 123,234
140,897
158,754 171,964 177,886 194,669
1,190,675
34,154 30,456
64,610
33,718
40,001 201,464
2141
2263
94,183
$366,088 $422,697 $495,265 $547,738 $680,396 $774,680 $866,767 $1,093,236 $5,246,867
Other credits or charges:
Current value credit $250,162
Debt payment credit 45,580
Final cost allocation -prior years
Total Credits or charges $295,742
70,346
Reserve capacity deferred charges
aad credits:
$ 56,339
44,340
100,67
322,01
$ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020 $ 61,020
43,100 41,860 40,620
(43,859) (50,274) (63,799) (39,947) (50,229) (89,986
S 60.261 S 52.606 $ 37.840 S 21.073 $ 10,791 $ (28,966
,00- $495,132 $642,556 $753,607 $855,976 $1 9 122,
$ 672,621
215,500
(338, 094
$ 550,026
,696,841
Current year deferrment. charges
811353
46,439
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
127,792
GRAND TOTAL
$151,699
$368,457
$435,004
$495,132
$642,556
$753,607
$855,976
$1,122,202
$4,824,633
Increase over prior years
Percent of increase over prior years
GALLONAGE:
Treatment Works Cost 1681
Treatment Works Costs - Reserve Capacity
Se- ;er Service No. 1 1681
Service Area No. 1- Reserve Capacity 1962
Percent of Total:
Treatment Works Cost .018599
Sever Service No. 1 .022383
Se-wer Area No. 1- Reserve Capacity .047289
Treatment Works Cost - Reserve Capacity
( ) Indicates red figure
(A) Percent of increase since 1971
$216,758
$ 66,547
$ 609128
$147,424
$1119051
$102,369
$ 266,226
142.89%
18.06%
13.82%
29.77%
17.28%
13.58%
31.10%
1505
1767
2141
2263
2290
2450
2156
627
591
1505
1767
2141
2263
2290
2450
2560
1988
1050
.017021 .018965 .022612 .024413 .024750 .026083 .028127
.021036 .023115 .028048 .030878 .031479 .033922 .037069
.046525 .048314
.019930 .021608
$ 970,503
639.76%(A)
t f�
t rAwmeRmliff, MAN,,
� 711
subdivision
Edina Interchange 6th Addn.
REQUEST NCi19BER S -77 -26
LOCATION: E. of Metro Blvd; ld of Hwy 100
& N. of Edina Industrial Blvd.
REQUEST: R(.nlZr of nvicting, office-
districts
O 250 51x) Tau iuuu
A�
21finge ujannLng dawriment
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November.30, 1977
S -77 -26 Edina Interchange 6th Addition.
Refer to: Attached graphic
The proponents are requesting a replat of part of Lot 4 and Lots 5 and 6,
Block 6, Edina Interchange Center. Presently, Lots 5 and 6 are oriented
in a north /south direction. The effect of the proposed replat is to
orient these lots in an east /west direction. Each of the three new
lots created would measure about 1.3 acres.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision in
that:
1) no additional lots will be created.
2) the request complies with the subdivision and zoning
ordinance.
3) Parkland dedication per the attached report.
GH:ks
11/23/77
- C:�
• r
J•
J
O
1
1
i
Tiil o
IV ',1� 7N 0
Jl
3 w 7� s� c I I h.• -: c• t21 l th.it is a
V _
re{ r. ta• ion of 1 �._. -:e^ cr .
?r Z P'cc' sFJ'_W S tho - :- �.'7 !e••t C: Let �.
Ch' •1 r vi : - -: S --th t�
- •_T /�OiJ. go YLF ,.M. � L\ : %•'_' fe. i :C• 13.'
�'IB�J N- iNOUSn¢iA�- I 3 UW'1!t : At r t
Fr 7-Ir
,,11 AAAP
2
- m NORTH le
3 /P• o
r3 lacaef,
l I .
! ••
D��•!�►. z: INrp- C, fANGE BouGEVA�2�
a Subdivision No. _7 �"�4
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: �Vi V� ' C1i�C - Ca I^
Zo
LAND SIZE: ( 3/ n �_ILAND VALUE:�GfJ
(By: Date:
The developer of.this subdivision has been required to
EA. grant an easement over part of the land
EJB. dedicate % of the land
C. donate as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
E1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
l beneficially expands the park.
II 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holing or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
El 2.
MAP
f
EI
subdivision
Dewey Hill Addn.
REQUEST NUMBER: S -77 -27
LOCATION: N. of W 78th; W. of Braemar Pk.
& S. of Dewey Hill RT.-
REQUEST: M lot single family plat
ylllame t+hnnins dr;.nrtment village n r-11
PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
November 30, 1977
S -77 -27 Dewey Hill Addition. Schuster Property.
Refer to: Attached preliminary plat and Indian
Meadows graphics.
Three years ago, the Planning Commission - approved a development
proposal known.as Indian Meadows r
easure acres in`siz�- and -ex- tennde4- fx-om- Dewey -- i33
R e�r�� even the -� a tdeve�epmerrt- Purr -was
allow 40 single family dwellings on the northerly
portion of the property which remained R -1 zoning and 291 multiple
dwelling units on the southerly portion of the site which was proposed to
be rezoned PRD -2. The northerly and southerly portions of the site were
divided by open space lands dedicated for the Southwest Edina storm sewer
ponding system. The single family lots on the northerly portion of the
site were to be served by two cul -de -sac streets from Dewey Hill Road.
Multiple family residences on the southerly portion of the site were to
be served by a cul -de -sac from W. 78th Street.
Since its approval by the Planning. Commission, the subject property has
been sold. The present owners are now proposing a single family subdivision
of the northerly portion of the site. Access to such lots would be provided
by a cul -de -sac from Dewey Hill Road. As compared to the previously
approved plan for the northerly portion of the site, the present plan
proposes a reduction in the total number of lots from 40 to 26.
These lots range in size from 18,000 square feet. to 53,000 square feet which
is substantially larger than existing lots to the north and east. A
20 foot wide outlot is also proposed westerly of Lot l to provide access
from Dewey Hill.. Road to City owned lands.
Staff and-the proponents have discussed generally the development of the
southerly portion of the Schuster property, i.e., that portion of the Indian
Meadows concept proposed for multiple dwellings Although the proponents
have not submitted any plans for this area, they have indicated their intent to
propose a lower density development than previously approved.
Adequate access and traffic circulation is of primary concern for the
southern portion of the site. Planning Commission will recall bat in its
approval of Braemar Hills 9th Addition on November 2, 1977, it requested
that three lots be identified as an outlot to facilitate,the possible access
extension of a roadway to serve the southerly portion of the Schuster property.
Although Delaney Blvd. had not been authorized by the Council, this roadway
could serve the Schuster property from the east. Jest 78th Street provides
southerly access. Therefore, due to 1) the provision of. adequate access from
the east, south and west, 2) the multiple residential character of the
S -77 -27
Dewey Hills Addn.
Page 2
November 30, 1977
southerly portion, of the property and'the single family character of-the
northerly portion of the property as well as other properties, 3) the
natural division between the northerly and southerly portions of the property
created by public open space lands and the Southwest Edina storm sewer ponds
and 4) perceived traffic problems on Dewey Hill Road, Planning Staff
believes that the northerly and southerly portions of the site should not
be connected with a roadway. Such a connection was not proposed as part
of the Indian Meadows concept.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed subdivision
in that:
1) the proposal conforms with the Southwest Eklina Plan.
2) the subdivision proposes a lower density than the
previously approved Indian Meadows concept.
3) lot sizes are similar to and exceed existing single
family lots in the vicinity of the subject property.
4) adequate access to public open space lands has been pro-
vided from Dewey Hill Road.
Approval is recommended with the following conditions and modifications:
1) an executed developer's agreement.
2) submission of an erosion control plan.
GH:ks
11/23/77
0
\� \ \
Jryv.r g-
-W?J, Tl •
—•�I \� i \ \\ \rte/
I
1 _ 1••
• / •T�,•rT •HO Ill �� I 1 \ 1 \Z I ' , �\\ ` ♦\ \\ /
� ' .. • : ` \ 1\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\ \ Z �fl
' x e��.t• 175 , �
I \ 1L�•�T p9•k
1 00 \let \\ `\ \ , \\ �\ \` I I \ �; / t — —� `.•11,�\ \\ \ \
r I
ss
• '. 'soo•zzsrw- \\ 1 \ \ � � , 1 \� { \� y � 1`' IBS \� ,. 1 1, •` \ !�
\ I 1 II ' ebo i 1 :`o,:,F \\• p•r, .. �� p01 \ 1 1 `�
' I e , / ► _
• `a I '��L�O •pnyMwai.\
jA
;
ff 1`
(0
• MCI _ /%` ; aT p� i 1 \�_ �__°� I , \ ► �.
• � I / � � r /� / n ar. � — _e.o.� l I I Tn/ // /', see i `\ \ 1, �� �./ �
• w / / i I - - -_ \ ` \ \ \\ \ \\ ` / /• I I , 1 ♦ — i i/
I\ ` •� `� � / ' /// i (9f/ / � /- ��� `� \ \ \ \�� —� 111 1 � I � .� 1 \ �i�I/ ��_
\ / / 1
\Ili \ \ \ , , .\ — \1
I�.�' ���••�• S i f � � 1 `i ,�T '� ` �\\ `� \\ \� - -'� /�� �'`�.. -�_ 1 1 I I \` 1111 � � � ,.1,fr- �-- -•-�• - -� �.���
ilk /0 -r t�• \ I �_� -�_ -1_ ��\\ \ \ \�. 1 \ 1 1 , r�l I 1� 1 f..s..sor
All/ 11
Zzd-
• , I I . �__ - -_ __� �� � —�♦ �♦ \ � �`\ \�\�� - - �i / / /ice / ._
. ���� ���— ���ii�� —� _��//" \4 -- ���r•����- ♦ - /:71.27- �- r'^�_— _��'rr / /T_, ������� �.�.
• r
DEWEY'c - -�
Jryv.r g-
-W?J, Tl •
—•�I \� i \ \\ \rte/
I
1 _ 1••
• / •T�,•rT •HO Ill �� I 1 \ 1 \Z I ' , �\\ ` ♦\ \\ /
� ' .. • : ` \ 1\ \ \ \ \\ \ \\\\ \ Z �fl
' x e��.t• 175 , �
I \ 1L�•�T p9•k
1 00 \let \\ `\ \ , \\ �\ \` I I \ �; / t — —� `.•11,�\ \\ \ \
r I
ss
• '. 'soo•zzsrw- \\ 1 \ \ � � , 1 \� { \� y � 1`' IBS \� ,. 1 1, •` \ !�
\ I 1 II ' ebo i 1 :`o,:,F \\• p•r, .. �� p01 \ 1 1 `�
' I e , / ► _
• `a I '��L�O •pnyMwai.\
jA
;
ff 1`
(0
• MCI _ /%` ; aT p� i 1 \�_ �__°� I , \ ► �.
• � I / � � r /� / n ar. � — _e.o.� l I I Tn/ // /', see i `\ \ 1, �� �./ �
• w / / i I - - -_ \ ` \ \ \\ \ \\ ` / /• I I , 1 ♦ — i i/
I\ ` •� `� � / ' /// i (9f/ / � /- ��� `� \ \ \ \�� —� 111 1 � I � .� 1 \ �i�I/ ��_
\ / / 1
\Ili \ \ \ , , .\ — \1
I�.�' ���••�• S i f � � 1 `i ,�T '� ` �\\ `� \\ \� - -'� /�� �'`�.. -�_ 1 1 I I \` 1111 � � � ,.1,fr- �-- -•-�• - -� �.���
ilk /0 -r t�• \ I �_� -�_ -1_ ��\\ \ \ \�. 1 \ 1 1 , r�l I 1� 1 f..s..sor
All/ 11
Zzd-
• , I I . �__ - -_ __� �� � —�♦ �♦ \ � �`\ \�\�� - - �i / / /ice / ._
. ���� ���— ���ii�� —� _��//" \4 -- ���r•����- ♦ - /:71.27- �- r'^�_— _��'rr / /T_, ������� �.�.
• r
LOCH TION MAP
PREL I"I V,1.4Y . f L A T of
Goo ° St {� 00
p I °iSCJ� Zp� q �. yo,k94}' Zprrq Z0 f�• {. t S�• if. G°
t0 d �a s'. f� if-
+, s,3e
1s4
v b 0 ��Sa• P r C V ,sdoar ?.f
110L .41, o °o Z / f
s 0014. k Ao0 7-/0/-/ s
7f
�
3
p EwE Y h' /L L 7•0
P9oo Sy. if p �� 2 60 p S9' ZO °' S4' � fp0.f 4 !9
f 59' 50 0ff 25` a ZS`p 3 24, o
• � 2Z`s4' � �f'• o�Z 2 �
500 ZL 20 S9•{ 2¢�0
19' Sq n f!• 00p F � V k
00 p0 SS �` /6 �• ti
sit
o S �9 4005 Zp 1 9150 St'; a
��ti�r
0 9,5 fi
Zt.JO 6 �r0 �So'� op
� c sg• {+• 2100 s4• S4'��
Ca . 20 Z
�44 2„ �� • oar v� ' 04
p
d� � Z8,60 7p,ZDdS4F�• bOp $4'' ../2 ff• p�SOp54 � 5°'
0 S9 t 3r 0 S4'
J /B /, 600 !9• ff• OUTLO T DDO
1 A IFS'
SCALE' r -zOO'
D i �,�0,000 s�•
Gi . 2•DrB;.000; ? Spy f7°•
0
0
kit
/mm
III
|
|
|
|
YA
--- -1 ' ----'�`
| | |
m-------------------'-
� | 14: am !.q, i 1 Ii i
lie i
utility plan
0 50
^'
�
`
.�
�
'
November 22, 1977
TO: Gordon Hughes, Director of Planning
FROM: Robert C. Dunn, City Engineer
SUBJECT:. Utility and Miscellaneous Engineering Considerations
Proposed Dewey Hill Addition
A review of preliminary information submitted raises the following preliminary
utility and miscellaneous engineering concerns regarding proposed Dewey Hill
Addition that must be resolved before final approval can be recommended:
1. Need development plan for entire Schuster property to finalize road
pattern and traffic flow in Southwest area...
2. Watermain must be connected to Buchanan Addition line and extended
through cut de sac to Dewey Hill.
3. Watermain in West.cul de sac can be 12" Copper to serve five homes.
4. Park land dedication or fee.
5. West cul de sac grade is extreme and must be re- examined.
6. Water services on Dewey Hill Road that are not used must be cut off
at main and sanitary sewer services plugged at curb line.
7. Homeowner's Association, must, by documentation, assume responsibility
for maintenance of barrier built along Dewey Hill and islands in street
right -of -way.
8. To determine path location in this plat, we should have overall path
plan for southwest area.
9. When location of path in this plat has been determined, who is to build it?
10 Open area at West edge of plat is not needed by City,for ponding. Area
below 840 contour is subject to flooding.however,and must be maintained as
open space /nature area.
11. Dewey Hill Road will, in the future, be improved with concrete curb and
gutter, bituminous paving and sidewalk to M.S.A. Standard Section. If
road pattern in area can be finalized per Item #l, this project should be
undertaken in 1978.
12. Drainage plan, including drainage structures located off public right -of-
way, must be evaluated to insure complete drainage of .property. Might be
necessary to document restrictions on grading of lots to insure proper
drainage to on site structures.
13. Suggested street sections must be evaluated for durability and proper
function.
Edina Park ,Board
ABSTRACT OF MINUTES
13 December-1977 Meeting
VII. S -77 -27 DEWEY HILL ADDITION
Generally located N of W 78th St.;
W of Braemar Park; and S of Dewey
Hill Road. Otherwise known as the
Schuster Property.
DISCUSSION: Park Department Director Bob Kojetin proposed a 5% cash
dedication in lieu of land. .Although the former owner of
this property, Mr. Schuster, did dedicate an amount of land that adequately
met Edina's Parkland dedication requirements adjacent to Nine Mile Creek,
Mr. Kojetin noted that.we are now dealing with a new owner proposing a
new plat. Mr. Kojetin further stated that in his recollection, Mr.
Schuster made his dedication for tax advantages only and did net specify
his land dedication for park or storm sewer holding purposes. In Mr.
Kojetin's opinion, this action did not constitute a parkland dedication.
Further discussion from other members of the Board generally supported
Mr. Kojetin's opinion that a new dedication be. required of this new plat.
Jack Rice, Board Chairman, who has been in contact with the proponent,
suggested that the proponent might be willing to consider building.a
park shelter building in William Wardwell Lewis Park (Dewey Hill Road
at Cahill Road). The shelter would be built according to Park Depart-
ment-specifications. Mr. Kojetin estimated that a building of this
type which has been built in other Edina parks, would cost approximately
$60,000 if built today.
Another point brought in discussion was that residents of the Dewey Hill
Addition will use City parks and other. facilities. Braemar and William
Wardwell Lewis Park can be expected to receive the highest use from these
residents. Therefore, some parkland dedication should be made on be-
half of these residents by the proponent.
ACTION: Al Fischer MOVED that.the Park Board recommend that the City Council
require a 5% cash dedication in lieu of land, or require a devel-
oper's agreement providing an alternative to the 5% dedication to be neg-
otiated with the Park Board and Park Department.
Les Wanninger SECONDED. CARRIED.
Jack Rice ABSTAINED.
W
December 15, 1977
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
SUBJECT: Brookview Heights 5th Addition
Dear Mayor Van- Valkenburg,
At the last meeting of the Edina Planning Commission the members
approved the subject subdivision by a split decision. This was
inspite of the many unanswered questions asked by the concerned
property owners surrounding this plat and over the protests of 64
such property owners who had previously tendered to the
commission a petition objecting to certain aspects of this
subdivision.
Our primary concerns can be narrowed to the following:
1. We believe any further encroachment on the Nine Mile Creek
Flood Plain should be prohibited. Already we are seeing
tremendous "flashing" of this formerly placid creek following
minor showers. Our properties have been put in jeopardy. The
question is no longer when will the flooding cause damage but how
serious the damage will be. The reported opinion that the
filling will only raise the creek height one more inch does not
take into consideration the great peat absorptive area that will
be eliminated. It's also questionable that they have considered
the added run -off from areas that formerly acted as ponding
basins in the subdivision.
2. We are concerned with the installation of another unsightly
storm sewer. When a 42 inch sewer was previously installed
surrounding property owners were told that it would be
landscaped. Fourteen years later our properties face right into
this open sewer pipe yet unlandscaped. The addition of another
in this same area will effect both the beauty of the area and our
property values.
3. We further feel that it is environmentally unsound to dump
street and surface water directly into the creek. The present
undeveloped nature area acts as a filtration catch and should be
preserved for that. The present sewer from Creek Drive dumps
.4
'CO. s +
eI Ca
W
Edina City Council
December 15, 1977
Page Two
j
directly into the creek bed.
4. We would appreciate the consideration of our council to
stipulations that all areas not absolutely necessary for building
be preserved in natural state and protected during any
construction. The present area harbors large numbers of
wildlife.
Since there were questions asked by our planning commission
members that were not answered and others by concerned
surrounding property owners we respectfully trust you will
consider the above in your deliberations.
Thank you kindly.
Sincerely,
Ray S. Clarke
6609 Cahill Road
Edina, Minnesota
941 -4425
December 13, 1977
To: Council Persons
City of Edina
Re: Preliminary Plan of Brookview Heights
Fifth Addition
The Nine Mile Creek in the area between Brookview Drive and Limerick
Drive is a beautiful area for wildlife and wildflowers, and it is
also one of the floodplain reservoirs. During the spring thaw and
during heavy rains, the area holds back the drainage and functions
as a storm water basin. Before this project is approved, the resi-
dents of the immediate and surrounding areas affected by the building
and filling proposed request the Council consider- modifications to
protect the property of the current °tax paying residents.
The spring thaw of 1977 and the 200 year rain of August 31, 1977,
produced flood levels in the area of the proposed subdivision higher
than any previously recorded. There is general- concern by the area
residents that the continual alteration of the floodplain in the
area.of the subdivision and downstream around Highway 100 will cause
property damage.
The Olsen residence at 6725.Cahill Road, by an Engineering Department
level check, is 1 1/2 foot in the floodplai.n.. The city planners'
assurance that the proposed fill will only raise the water 1 inch is
of little consolation when the additional inch is in the bedroom and
the family room of the Olsen family.
The residents along Ridgeview Drive, 6700'through 6720, have experienced
continual water damage from both s.ewer back -up and surface water. The
water problem occurred on .August 31, 1977, and during other heavy rain-
falls. The drainage for the Ridgeview Drive area is through the culvert
r
i Council Persons
Page 2
December 13, 1977 .
located north of 6'700 Ridgeview. The proposed subdivision fill in
the area of lots 8 & 9 will further restrict.storm run -off, and thus
increase intensity and frequency.of flooding to 6700 through 6720
Ridgeview.
Nine Mile Creek meanders.in the area of the subdivision. It wanders
back and forth through the 200 foot wide strip owned by the city.
It no longer follows the path shown by tfie city planners' charts.
(See aerial photo.) It. in.fact will need considerable protection
from the fill and grading proposed in the subdivision description.
The creek is a valuable resource to .the city and to the local res -i-
dents. To the city, it is a storm water basin, storm water discharge
system, and a source of tax revenue due to its aesthetic appeal. To
the residents, it is a thing of beauty. We do not want it damaged
by over development'
The storm sewer at the north end of the proposed subdivision should
be built so that.the low op int for the subdivision and existing homes
on Limeri -ck Drive is totally on the property of. the new proposed
subdivision, preferably between lots 1 & 2 and 17 & 18. Also, the
discharge of the storm sewer, regardless of size, should be some
distance away from the creek and made to blend in with the environ-
ment. We currently have one 42 inch open culvert sewer to view, and
another is unacceptable. The c.urrent residents on the north border
of the subdivision did not receive compensation.for the fact that
t -heir homes would be the low point in the ,area's storm drain plain.
If the low point were between lots 1 & 2 and 17 & 18,.the buyers of
these lots would be aware of the fact at the time of purchase.
We request the following modifications tolthe proposed subdivision
to correct the above mentioned objections:
1.) Reduction of the total development by.two lots, moving the
cul.desac north and thus reducing the fill in the floodplain.
Reducing or eliminating the restriction to the storm water
flow under.the railroad tracks.,
4
Council Persons
Page 3
December 13, 1977 i
Result: No increase flooding to homes on Ridgeview. No
loss of floodplain water storage capacity. Insur-
ance of better protection to the creek and
minimize possible flooding.
2.) Move the storm sewer between lots 1 & 2 and 17 & 18, and
make the discharge blend in with the surroundings.
Result: a.) Preserve the aesthetic appeal of the area..
b.) Protect existing structures from potential
damage during storm.water run -off.
c.) Minimize siltation and damage to the creek.
The council has a responsibility to current tax paying residents to.
protect their property by maintaining control during this subdivision
development. We request yo hel
.�-
Residents of the area:
1
C-�
6,711
C. —Il
i� 016
7..20 ��
Attached is a copy of the Aidgeview Drive petition to the Edina Planning
commission that was presented in November 1977.
LW
Awl
SMANO& as as bow airs fr= aftagim W. �+&19�i'7 dgbe" nsWaad ustw duagn frm tM fiof Aftw sa bavo oaftiod
at frm Otbw ba" rsinfolls, ro PO'Kti"
ag *go s. f the sity OWANU is NAM WCOOMMY ASWF%EsRU is "Pvv* the
wwaff tbreaA
the savwt ],seated to the north of 670 RLdgeAew WO
gloe mob st go Istm amp wastalmd frm the Angst 34 1977 flood 1040d"
up of "m =two as wou as surf&" start go lolu a," potlt�
M
the SL%y
AMU to now use"907 to ma
this emit
Um t1w sity ftmen for "@W&mo that the WUdift of Vw
S�,M�bdisWsa a& UUM AU IM tM rat= rwb4ff MA llwroase
P.5"Oh a
4"m emw QMPSAV for 0" assn.
I
11-o2--77
7 7
,W,
IrA
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner
SUBJECT: Year IV Community Development Funds
On January 9, 1978,. the City Council will hold'the second of two required
public hearings regarding Year IV Community Development Funds. To date,
we have received three formal suggestions for use of such funds. First,
the Police Department has suggested an allocation for funding Community
'Service Officers who would serve in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
area. Unfortunately, we have determined from Hennepin County that such
an activity would be ineligible. Secondly, the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority has suggested that funds be allocated for land acquisition for
low and moderate income housing and for the housing rehabilitation
program. Both activities are eligible activities. Thirdly, the
Recycling Commission recommended an allocation for a management and
feasibility study regarding the establishment of a pilot door to door
recycling project in the Morningside area. It is suggested that such
funds be used for consultant services. Staff has determined that this
is also an eligible activity.
For preliminary discussion purposes, staff suggests the following
allocation:
- Land Acquisition for Low and Moderate Income
Housing $ 150,000.
- Housing Rehabilitation 70,000
- Land Acquisition Administrative Costs 11,000
- Housing Rehabilitation Administrative Costs 12,000
- Plan Preparation for Handicapped Access to
City Hall 5,000
- Morningside Recycling Study 12,000
- Comprehensive Plan Preparation 15,000
$;.:275, 000
For comparison purposes, the following chart illustrates Year I, Year II
nnrd Yaar TTT allocations:
YEAR I
50th and France $29,064
Senior Citizens Center 5,000
Neighborhood Parks 8,500
Lake Cornelia 10,000
Housing 20,000
$72,564
Property Acquisition
Appliance Purchases
Bredesen Fencing
Bike Paths
Rehabilitation loan & grant
ICY
i'
Memorandum
Kenneth Rosland
Page 2
January 5, 1978
YEAR II
50th and France $ 51,000
Senior Citizens Center 2,355
Neighborhood Parks 23,000
Housing 20,000
Morningside 45,000
Historic. Mill 4,845
Diseased Tree Program 5,005
' $151,205
YEAR III
Liquor Store -
Audio- Visual Purchases
Weber, York, Alden Land-
scaping, Equipment
Rehabilitation loan & grant
Engineering Study.
Archeological Study
Dutch Elm Replacement
Historic Survey $ 5,000
Historic Preservation 21,000 Mill Site
Diseased Trees 1,000 Shade Tree Replacement
Morningside 135,500 Sanitary Sewer
50th and France 30,000 Land Write -Down
Park Improvements 17,500 Chowen, Parbury, Grandview
Low Income Housing 39,397 Rehabilitation loan & grant
$249,397
On past occasions, the Council has expressed an interest in directing
Community Development funds to the Morningside area. Staff has noted
that for the Morningside area improvements to qualify for Community
Development funds,. it must be shown that 51% of the residents of the area,
or portion of the area (such as a block) must be low and moderate income.
The entire Morningside area has less than 25% low and moderate residents.
Staff is unable to obtain income information for individual blocks unless
a door to door survey-is made. However, based on other block
characteristics available to us (such as value of houses, minority owner-
ship, female head of household, etc.), staff believes that none of the
blocks in Morningside would have a majority of its residents below the
low and moderate income level. Staff has discussed this opinion with a
representative of the Morningside Neighborhood Council and he agrees with
this conclusion. ..Thus, staff believes that Year IV Community Development
funds could not be used for the Morningside improvements project. Please
note, however, that $135,000 of Year -III funds remairy available for
Morningside.
GLH:ks
1/5/77
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner
SUBJECT: Year IV Community Development Funds
On January 9, 1978, the.City Council will hold the second of two required
public hearings regarding Year IV Community Development Funds. To date,
we have received three formal suggestions for use of such funds. First,
the Police Department has suggested an allocation for funding Community.
'Service Officers who would serve in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
area. Unfortunately, we have determined from Hennepin County that such
an activity would be ineligible. Secondly, the.Housing and Redevelopment
Authority has suggested that funds be allocated for land acquisition for
low and moderate income housing and for the housing rehabilitation
program. Both activities are eligible activities. Thirdly, the
Recycling Commission recommended an allocation for a management and
feasibility study regarding the establishment of a pilot door to door
recycling project in the Morningside area. It is suggested that such
funds be used for consultant services. Staff has determined that this
is also an eligible activity.
For preliminary discussion purposes, staff suggests the following
allocation:
- Land Acquisition for Low and Moderate - Income
Housing $ 150,000.
- Housing Rehabilitation 70,000
- Land Acquisition Administrative Costs 11,000
- Housing Rehabilitation Administrative Costs 12,000
- Plan Preparation for Handicapped Access to
City Hall 5,000
Morningside Recycling Study 12,000
Comprehensive Plan Preparation 15,000
- - - $2759000
For comparison purposes, the following chart illustrates Year I, Year II
and Year III allocations:
YEAR I
50th and France $29,064 Property Acquisition
Senior Citizens Center 5,000 Appliance Purchases
Neighborhood Parks 8,500 Bredesen Fencing
Lake Cornelia 109000 Bike Paths
Housing 20,000 Rehabilitation loan & grant
$72,564
Memorandum
Kenneth Rosland
Page 2
January 5, 1978
YEAR II
50th and France $ 51,000
Senior Citizens Center 2,355
Neighborhood Parks 23,000
Housing 20,000
Morningside 45,000
Historic Mill 4,845
Diseased Tree Program 5,005
$151,205
YEAR III
Historic Survey $ 5,000
Historic Preservation 21,000
Diseased Trees 1,000
Morningside 135,500
50th and France 30,000
Park Improvements 17,500
Low Income Housing 39,397
$249,397
Liquor Store
Audio - Visual Purchases
Weber, York, Alden Land-
scaping, Equipment
Rehabilitation loan & grant
Engineering Study
Archeological Study
Dutch Elm Replacement
Mill Site
Shade Tree Replacement
Sanitary Sewer
Land Write -Down
Chowen, Parbury, Grandview
Rehabilitation loan & grant
On past occasions, the Council has expressed an interest in directing
Community Development funds to the Morningside area. Staff has noted
that for the Morningside area improvements to qualify for Community
Development funds,. it must be shown that 51% of the residents of the area,
or portion of the area (such as a block) must be low and moderate income.
The entire Morningside area has less than 25% low and moderate residents.
Staff is unable to obtain income information for individual blocks unless
a door to door survey is made. However, based on other block
characteristics available to us (such as value of houses, minority owner-
ship, female head of household, etc.), staff believes that none of the
blocks in Morningside would have a majority of its residents below the
low and moderate income level. Staff has discussed.this opinion with a
representative of the Morningside Neighborhood Council and he agrees with
this conclusion. Thus, staff believes that Year IV Community Development
funds could not be used for the Morningside improvements project. Please
note, however, that $135,000 of Year III funds remain-available for
Morningside.
GLH:ks
1/5/77
December 9, 1977
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS
I. Flow of Grant Money From Department of Housing and Urban Development
A. Entitlement Grants
1. SMSA Central Cities
2. Urban Counties
3. Other cities -with population 50,000.
B. Discretionary Grants
1. Metropolitan
2. Non - Metropolitan
II. Use of Block Grant Money - 1974 - 1977
A. Definitions
1. Housing Assistance Plan (HAP). - A guide intended to improve
the process of .housing planning and to effect a stronger
relationship between establishment of a housing plan,
coordination of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
activities, and the delivery of housing assistance resources.
2. Community Development Block Grant - a.federal appropriation
to local units of government for use.in areas inhabited by a
majority of low- moderate income persons, to finance activities
that benefit low- moderate persons, and to. stimulate economic
development in areas of high unemployment.
B. Basic Eligible Activities 1974 - 1977
1. Acquisition
2. Disposition
3. Public Facilities and Improvements
(a) Senior Centers
(b) Parks, playgrounds and other recreation facilites
(c) Neighborhood facilities
(d) Solid waste disposal facilities
(e) Fire protection facilities and equipment
(f) Parking facilities
(g) Street improvements
(h) Water and sewer facilities
Community Development Block Grants
Page Two
December 9, 1977
B. - Basic Eligible Activities 1974 - 1977 (Continued)
3.
(i) Pedestrian malls and.walkways
(j) Flood and drainage facilities
(k) Cultural-and educational activities
4. Clearance
5. Rehabilitation
6. Economic Development Activities
7. Planning, urban and environmental design, environmental,
studies and administrative costs
III. Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
A. Congressional dissatisfaction with use of funds in the first
three years of the block grant program:
B. New Regulations: Effect Upon Edina
1. CAPITAL OR SERVICE PROJECTS SERVING AREAS WHERE A MAJORITY
OF THE INHABITANTS ARE LOW - MODERATE INCOME PERSONS
These are projects that serve a geographic area consisting of
one or more census tracts, enumeration districts or parts
thereof, designated by the City of Edina, whose population
contains a majority of low-moderate-income persons. The ,total
cost of such projects and activities may be considered to
principally benefit low - moderate income persons if:
(a) The project is designed to meet specific
needs of low - moderate income persons; and
(b) The major benefits of the project will be for the
low- moderate income residents of the area.
(Refer to Table 3 of Memorandum)
2. PROJECTS directly benefitting low and moderate income persons
residing outside of low and moderate income areas.
(Refer to Table 4 of Memorandum)
3. Exceptions
(a) 25% of funds
(b) difficult to justify except in economically distressed
areas.
GW:ks
MEMORANDUM
TO,: Mayor, Council Members, Staff
DATE: December 9, 1977
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1977
Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act.of 1974
authorized the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to provide .
grants to qualifying local units of government'. The City of Edina has received
.an entitlement grant for 1975 -1977 and now must apply for grants covering
community development activities for a three year. period covering 1978 - 1980.
Edina has joined with 35 additional Hennepin County communities and the County
to develop and submit an application for federal assistance as an Urban County
(community within a,county having a population of 200,000 not including the
central city) pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Acts of 1974
and 1977.
The amount of funding allocated to Hennepin County is determined
by H.U.D. using a formula based upon the total population, total extent of
poverty and the total extent of housing within the cities cooperating jointly,.
with the county to submit the application. The amount of funding which each
cooperating city.in the Urban Hennepin County program receives is determined
by using the same formula which H.U.D. uses in determining Hennepin County's
share of the total entitlement for urban counties within the U.S.
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 requires each
municipality to submit an application and a housing assistance plan. specifying
the use of the federal grant assistance in the community. The application
summarizes how the city intends to utilize its grant in each year and outlines
the amount of money allocated to each project or program. The Housing Assistance.
Plan (HAP) - requires each municipality to develop a strategy for dealing.with
the housing needs.of low- moderate income persons. The HAP covers a three year
period and involves a statement of goals and target areas where housing
assistance is needed. The community then specifies a strategy outlining the
programs and projects that will address the specified housing needs of low -
moderate income persons. After each three year period, a statement of.accomplish-
ment is issued by the County.
Housing and Community Development Act of.1977
Page Two
December 9, 1977
Edina is now completing the final year of the three year HAP and the
annual CDBG: The initial three years of the Community Development program
allowed each municipality a flexible degree of latitude in determining priorities
and in what fashion the grant money was to be allocated. However, amendments
to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 in 1977 have reduced the
flexibility local units of government had previously enjoyed in the use of
these funds. The use of CDBG money is now linked to .projects that benefit
low and moderate income families as opposed to.the former regulations that
required the city to give "maximum feasible priority" to projects that benefit
low and moderate income - families.
THE 1975 - 1977 EXPERIENCE
Edina's three year total for CDBG funds from 1975 through 1977 was
$473,166. An outline of the annual allocations and the specific uses follows:
YEAR I
50th and France.
Senior Citizens Center
Neighborhood Parks
Lake Cornelia
Housing
YEAR II
50th and France
Senior Citizens Center
Neighborhood Parks
Housing
Morningside
Historic Mill
Diseased Tree Program
$29,064 Property Acquisition
5,000 Appliance Purchases .
8,500 Bredesen Fencing
10,000 Bike Paths
20,000 Rehabilitation loan & grant
$72,564
$51,000
2,355
23,000
20,000
45,000
4,845
5,005
$151,205
Liquor Store
Audio Visual Purchases
Weber, York, Alden Land -
scaping, Equipment
Rehabilitation loan & grant
Engineering Study
Archeological Study
Dutch E1m.Replacement
Housing and Community De,,elopmezt Act of 1977
Page Three
December 9, 1977
YEAR III
Historic Survey $ 51000
Historic Preservation 21,000 Mill Site
Diseased Trees 1,000 Shade Tree Replacement
Morningside 135,500 Sanitary Sewer
50th and France 30,000 Land Write -Down
Park Improvements 17,500 Chowen, Parbury, Grandview
Low Income Housing.. 39,397 Rehabilitation loan & grant
$249,397
THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT: HOW THE 1977 AMENDMENT WILL AFFECT EDINA .
.Although many of the activities formerly qualifying as eligible
uses of community development money are still considered eligible activities
according to the 1977 regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, the direct nexus of said activities to the benefit of low- moderate
income families is required before CD money can be utilized. The 1977 amendments
were a result of "concerns that the statutory intent of the'Act was not being
met in consistent fashion, and that benefits to lower income persons might be
diminishing." The City of Edina must therefore use block grant funds for projects
or programs that principally benefit low and moderate income persons. The local
HUD area office and the planning division at.Hennepin County have agreed upon a
figure of $9,000 and below constituting low income and $15,520 and below
constituting a moderate income.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS IN AREAS CONTAINING A MAJORITY OF LOW AND MODERATE
INCOME PERSONS
Community Development Block Grants can be used for basic activities such
as property acquisition and disposition, public facilities and improvements
(i.e. senior centers, parks, neighborhood facilities, etc.), clearance activities,
public services, urban renewal completion, relocation assistance. Any of these
activities may be undertaken in areas where a majority of the population is
characterized as low- moderate income families, i.e. families with incomes below
$15,520 per year.
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Four
December 9, 1977
PROJECTS AND ACTIVITIES WHICH DIRECTLY BENEFIT LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS
Along with the basic eligible activities outlined above, grant
assistance may also be used for the rehabilitation and preservation of residentail
and non - residential property. Rehabilitation money may take the form of
assistance to renovate publicly owned housing. This use would not be applicable
to Edina since the City owns no public housing. However., other eligible
rehabilitation activities could be considered. A non - profit entity or
corporation could be contracted with for the rehabilitation of dilapidated.
housing purchased and resold by the City. Community Development money would also
be available 'to provide materials to low- moderate income families for the
rehabilitation of their dwellings. The establishment of a "tool bank" is an
example of this rehabilitation activity..
The financing of the rehabilitation of privately owned residential,
non- residential and mixed use properties through the direct use of block grant
funds is the most common use of CDBG money. The City of Edina has utilized block
grant money in this manner to establish a rehabilitation loan -grant program
administered by the planning department.
EXCEPTIONS
Exceptions to the low- moderate income benefit principle are available
and may utilize no more than 25 percent of the grant funds. Exceptions for
programs involving the prevention or elimination of slums or blighted areas or
programs designed to alleviate a serious and immediate threat to the health or
welfare of the Community are possible, but only after extensive documentation
demonstrating the need for such a program. Exceptions are generally granted only
to economically distressed cities and urban counties and Edina does not qualify
under these classifications.
C.D.B.G.: 1978 FUNDING AND SUMMARY
Edina can anticipate receiving $275,706 as the year IV, 1978
Community Development Block Grant. Citizen participation and involvement in .the
decision making process to determine the allocations of the CDBG is required.
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Five
December 9, 1977
In determining the allocation of the 1978 Community Development
Block Grant, the City of Edina must remain aware of the need to use funds for
projects or activities which directly benefit low- moderate income persons.
When possible, funds should be used in areas that principally benefit low- moderate
income persons.
This funding should be directed to projects located in, or serving
a geographic area containing a population having a majority of low and moderate
income persons. The City Council should remember that this regulation will
temper the'use of the 1978 block grant.
FOOTNOTE
1 "Community Development Block Grants" Department of Housing and
Urban Development, Federal Register: October 25, 1977, Vol. 42,
No. 205 (National Archives of the United States, U.S. Printing
Office: Washington, D.C.),,.
'iA1 1
_ viOUS,IH G ANA COMMUNITY DEVEL®pmeNT
1977 BLOCK GRANT FUNDING
��,ut_ES; ►�cGUI.A'C'101VS; AP��;b'�ti \taT \oNSI
) E� AZT KENT'. (D 'IF HOVS\AEr
aND 0; \3AtA
ENT \'VLEIN \ENT I
FUN05
STAS A C e2 cmes
CC�VN
IS
11L- N1.1� 1� 1\y
1 N A
1. 3 c.klES?-
ItteTZ,p MV NGPN ff Iss
D \SCR ET\ 0 ►��Y
ACT_
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Six
December 9, 1977
TABLE 2
USE OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT MONEY
1975 THROUGH 1977
1975 YEAR I
Area /Program Amount Specific Activity
50th and France $ 29,064 Property Acquisition
Senior Citizen Center 5,000 Appliance Purchases
Neighborhood Parks 8,500 Bredesen Fencing
Lake Cornelia 10,000 Bike Paths
Housing 20,000 Rehabilitation Loan & Grant
$ 72,564
1976 YEAR II
50th and France $ 51,000 Liquor Store
Senior Citizens Center 2,355 Audio Visual Equipment
Neighborhood Parks 23,000 Weber, York, Alden Equip-
ment and Landscaping
Housing 20,.000 Rehabilitation Loan & Grant
Morningside 45,000 Engineering Study
Historic Mill 4,845 Archeological Study
Diseased Tree Program 5,005 Dutch Elm Replacement
$151,205
1977 YEAR III
50th and France
$ 30,000
Land Write -Down
Park Improvements
17,500
Chowen, Parbury, Grand-
view Equipment
Morningside
135,500
Sanitary Sewer
Housing
39,397
Rehabilitation Loan
Historic Survey
8,000
Survey of City
Historic Preservation
21,000
Diseased Trees
1,000
Shade Tree Replacement
$249,397
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Seven
December 9, 1977
TABLE 3
ACTIVITIES PERMISSIBLE IN AREAS WHOSE
POPULATION CONTAINS A MAJORITY OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME PERSONS*
1. Acquisition of property for site assemblage for
low- moderate income housing.
2. Disposition of acquired property.
3. Construction of neighborhood facilities to serve for
and moderate income areas.
4. Parks, playgrounds or other recreational facilities.
5. Clearance activities.
6. Flood and drainage facilities.
7. Public works facilities and site or other improvements
(street, water and sewer replacement or installation.
8. Public services (crime prevention, drug abuse, etc.)
*a majority (51 %) of the population of the area must be low- moderate income
persons.
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Eight
December 9, 1977
TABLE 4
ACTIVITIES DIRECTLY BENEFITTING LOW - MODERATE
INCOME PERSONS
1. Rehabilitation financing
(a) costs of rehabilitation and repair of low- moderate
income residential property.
(b) cost of rehabilitation and repair of non- residential
property that serves low income areas.
2. Provision of rehabilitation materials
3. Rehabilitation by non - profit activities.
4. Removal of architectural barriers and modification of
existing facilities to permit access to the handicapped.
Housing and Community Development Act of 197.7
Page Nine
December 9, 1977
TABLE 5
EXCEPTIONS
1. Comprehensive neighborhood revitalization programs
in areas that the extent of physical decay, deterioration,
economic decline, or disinvestment is of sufficient magnitude
that public action is required at the present time to arrest
these conditions.
2. Elimination of detrimental conditions which are scattered
or located outside comprehensive neighborhood revitalization
areas.
3. Completion or urban renewal projects.
0
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Ten
December 9, 1977
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
As part of the Community.Development application process, Edina
must .submit a Housing Assistance Plan for each funding year. This current
plan reflects a portion of the three year goal for providing assistance to
residents with low- moderate incomes.
The Housing Assistance Plan lists the type of assistance to be
used, and gives a break down of family types and sizes to be assisted. The
goals stated in the HAP's and performance achieved in the previous year are
primary tools used by the Metro Council in reviewing applications for funding.
With the exception of the pending Southeast Edina Plan, Edina's
only current achievements are in Sections C & D of the Housing Assistance Plan.
(See attached one and three year HAP's). A discussion of the current Housing
Assistance program, in Edina, follows.
The City of Edina is presently involved in three housing assistance
programs; grants to low income homeowners, deferred ,loans to low and moderate
income homeowners, and rent assistance to low,- moderate income families and
individuals.. The combination of these programs represents the City's commitment
to maintaining and improving its existing housing stock, as well as providing
decent and safe living conditions for all residents.
The purpose of this memorandum is to briefly describe the workings
of Edina's housing assistance programs. The attachments to this - memorandum are
intended to show some characteristics of the recipients and'their homes.
MINNESOTA HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY GRANT PROGRAM
During this, the second year of the grant program, the City has
$33,106 (from MHFA) to make grants to Edina, owner-occupants with incomes of
$S,OOO.or less. This year's finding level represents a 20% increase over Year I.
The short term goals of the program are to improve energy efficiency
and correct major structural and mechanical defects in homes whose owners have
low incomes. The long term goal is.to extend the economic life of our older
neighborhoods which would otherwise deteriorate because of high maintenance costs.
Modifications necessary to meet peculiar needs existing in participating
communities are possible because of the flexibility of the program.
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Eleven
December 9, 1977
The process of securing grant money begins in early summer with the
formulation of the local application. Applications are reviewed and modified
by the Metropolitan Council before final allocations are made in late summer.
Once the final funding level is known, the City and the Minnesota
Housing Finance Agency enter into a contract specifying the obligations of both
parties in the distribution of the funds.
As a local administrative center we have several responsibilities
under our contract with the State. Generally, they are as follows:
1. Public outreach and advertising.
2. Inspections before, during and after completion of work.
3. Counselling and assisting homeowners in cost estimating,
work write -ups, and contractor bidding.
4. Handling of all program forms and reporting.
5. Verification of applicants assets, income, and property
ownership.
6. Submission of all necessary information to MHFA.
7. Handling contractor - homeowner problems as they arise, and
payment to individual contractors upon satisfactory
completion of all work.
Eligibility requirements of the grant program target funding for
the lowest income homeowners, particularly the elderly. A statistical summary of
Year I and a tentative summary of Year II. to date are included for your
review (Tables. I & II).
DEFERRED PAYMENT LOAN PROGRAM /MHFA LOAN PROGRAM
The- second component of Edina's housing assitance program is a
cooperative effort between the City and First Edina National Bank, Using funds
allocated from the City's entitlement under the Community Development Block
Grant Program, eligible homeowners may be given a deferred loan to supplement a
MHFA low interest loan from the bank. The current phase has $100,000 in MHFA
loan money administered by the bank and supplemented by $33,887 in City funds.
Housing and Community Development Act of 1977
Page Twelve
December 9, 1977
Under this program,-,families and individuals with adjusted gross .
incomes under $16,000 are eligible for bank loans, with the City's deferred
loan award varying by income and family size. A copy of the deferred loan
schedule of City loans percentages is.included for your review. Some families
may be eligible for a 100% deferred loan, but it may not exceed $1500.00. All
City loans are secured by a recorded lien on the property,for a seven year period.
Staff responsibilities under the deferred loan program are similar
to the grant program except that most applications are handled by bank. officials.
The bank application is similar to other personal loan procedures, such as
Title I home improvement loans.
Since this cooperative effort was begun in the summer of 1976, a
close working relationship has been established with the bank. The bank has
been willing to package the loans because City staff has provided the publicity
and screening of applicants necessary to minimize their time commitment in a
marginally profitable program. They consider their effort to be a public service'.
Staff considers this program a most important part of the housing
assistance program because of the amount invested in Edina's housing stock by
homeowners who could not bear the cost of market rate financing. In the last
six months of this year alone, this program has financed close to $140,000 in
home improvements in Edina.
A statistical summary of the first two phases of the Deferred Pay-
ment Loan Program is included for your review. Please note the income and interest
rate figures.
HUD SECTION 8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE
Section 8 is a rental subsidy program which allows low income
i
families to reduce their housing costs to not more than 25% of their income.
Funding, authorized by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1.974, Title I,
pays the difference between the family's contribution and the market rent, up
to a maximum determined by HUD.
In Edina, Section 8 funds are used in two different ways. The first
is Section 8 - New which is a set aside of funds for a new unit for a specified
number of years. In Edina, Section 8 - New will provide the subsidies for the
new units in Southeast Edina. The second use of Section 8 in Edina is the
"existing" program. Under this program, funds are set aside for approved
families to subsidize rents in existing rental units under private ownership.
Housing and Community Development Act of.1977 .
Page Thirteen
December 9, 1977
Other uses of Section 8 subsidies include, set asides for substantially
rehabilitated rental units, and subsidies for units.owned and operated by public
agencies. Although these .uses of subsidies are common in the metropolitan area,
they are not used in Edina nor do they appear likely in the near. future.
At this time, Section 8 - Existing is the only on goin use of the
HUD subsidies. Currently Edina is one of 51 metropolitan communities
participating in the-rent-subsidy program managed by The Metropolitan Council
H.R.A. Staff in Edina act as a field office to process applications and assist
tenants in their search for rental units.. Applications are reviewed and
certificates issued by the Metro H.R.A.
H:L:W:ks
I
HOUSItIG ASSISTANCE PLAN ,
TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE.
CURRENT YEAR COAL
,I. NAME OF APPLICANT
City of Edina
7: LJ ORIGINAL -
^
` -1 AMENDMENT, DATEI
2. APPLICATIONIGRANT NUMOlA
HOUSItIG ASSISTANCE PLAN ,
TABLE 111. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE.
CURRENT YEAR COAL
,I. NAME OF APPLICANT
City of Edina
7: LJ ORIGINAL -
^
` -1 AMENDMENT, DATEI
2. APPLICATIONIGRANT NUMOlA
4. PROGRAM YEAR
FROM: 1977 TO. 1978
HB
I
-
TYPES AND SOURCES OF ASSISTANCE -
F
NUMBER OF 1IOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED
ALL
HOUSEHOLDS
ELDERLY OR
HANDICAPPED
(I —1 persons)
FAMILY
( Iorless
peraons)
LARGE
FAMILY
(5 up more
p er can sl
Ie)
(b)
(c)
ld)
10)
A. NEW RENTAL UNITS
-
1
. Section 8 -HUD
5
45
-
2
2. State AgencT—Toto (Sum u(lines a and b)
o. Section 8
3
4
b. Other
s
3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing
(Identif)) •'Total
0 11M 11 Bonus" I;
1
G
55
1q
7
P
b.
s6
4. Total (Sum n( lines 1.2.and 3)
163
S. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS
`
9
1. Section 8 —HUD
t0
2. State A enc —Total (Sum of lines a and b)
_
11
0. Section 8
12
b. Other
13
3. Other Assisted Rehabilitation of Rental Housing
(lden(ijy) — Totel
..
_
'
14-
a,
3s
16
_b
4. Total (Sum of lines 1. 2, and 3)
C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
17
1, Section 8 —HUD
to
2. Slate Agency —Total (Su+n of lines a and b)
19
0. Section 8
20
b. Other
21
3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing
(ldcnrif)) — Total
t2
0.
za
b,
24
4. Total (Sulam ( line% 1. 2. and 3)
u
}
D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
Grts _
1. CD _Block an
2S
26
2. Sect on 235 _
3. Olhcr Rehabilitation Assistance to Homeowners or
Prospective Homeowners (ldentvjrl - Total
27
—
ze
o. 1h111 "EA Grarit- -Program
am
�9
5
5-
30
4. Toral f ±w-i of lI „r% 1. 2, and .1)
E. NEW CONSTRUCTIO14 ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECtIVE HOMEOWNERS
L_Scctio.4.135-- .— __.._ —' - - --
2. _Other Idrntl v) — Total
31
37
)4
b,
75
3. Total (.Sum of lines I and :1 .
16
F. ALL HOUSING ,.SSI ',TAti'[ GOALS
(Sum of lilacs .11-1. If J. C.I.1)1. and 4.11
.295
111
129
55
HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN
TABLE III. GOALS FOR LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE,
THREE YEAR GOAL'.
1. NAME OF APPLICANT -
' City of Edina
Y. — ORIGINAL
L -1 AMENDMENT. DATEI
2. APPLICATION /GnANT NUMBER
4. PROGRAM YEAR
FROM: 1977 TO: 1980
B
—
—
—
-
TYPES AND SOURCES OF. ASSISTANCE
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS TO BE ASSISTED
ALL
HOUSEHOLDS
ELDERLY OR
HANDICAPPED
(1-2 persons)
FAMILY
( or 1 loss
persons)
LARGE
FAMILY
(s up more
persuns)
(o)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(al
A. NEW RENTAL UNITS
1
1. Section 8 –HUD
2
2_Slate AaenCy—Toto (Sum u( lines a and 6)
o.' Section 8
4 1
b. Other
s
3. Other Assisted New Rental Housing
(Identif)) . Total
6
a liUD "Bonus" CD funds
11103
b Ir _ II
5
s
4. Total (Sum of lines l.?, and 3)
313
B. REHABILITATION OF RENTAL UNITS
1. Section 8 –HUD
to
2. Stale A enc –Total (Sum of linl•s a and b)
_
11
rs
0. Section 8
12
b. Other
la
_
3. Other Assis :ed Rehabilitation of Rental Housing
(identify) – Total
14
a
16
14. Total (Sum of lines 1. ?, and 3)
C. EXISTING RENTAL UNITS
17
1. Section 8 –HUD
141
114,
IB
2. State Agency –Total (`um of lines a and b)
Is
a. — Section 8
20
b. Other
21
3. Other Assisted Existing Rental Housing
(ldcnri f)) – Total
22
0,
23
b,
24
4. Total (Sum of line 1, ?, and 3)
D. REHABILITATION ASSISTANCE TO HOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
2s
1. CD Block Grants
76
2. Scction 235
3. Other Rehabilitation Assistanee.to Homeowners or
Prospective HomeownersOdent , p) - Total
t7
21%
21
t-
a, M-IFA Gran Program
6�1--
10
70.
_6.
4. Total (`um of Macs 1,:, nni..tJ -
E. NEW CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE TO IOMEOWNERS OR
PROSPECTIVE HOMEOWNERS
1_Scclio.7_ _ –.– _.._ —. —.
I35
2. O�her_I /Jrntl /rl – Tool
21
�?
)s
3. Total (Sum of lines I and 2)
�6
F'. ALL ItOUSING :.SSI '.TAN:[ GOALS
(Sum of lines .4 1, It J. C•1.1) 1, and ):.1)
'
639
244
319
76
MHFA
PHASE I STATISTICS
GRANTS .
TALLY SHEET
Average
Age of
Head of Household
- 68
Average
Age of
Structure
- 47 years
Average
Gross
Income
- $4,060.00
Lowest
Grant Awarded
- $ 295.00
Highest
Grant
Awarded
- $4,187.00
No.
in
Heads
Age
Age.
of
Avg.
Gross
Improve-
No. of
Female.
Fam.
Home
Income
Award
ments
Children.
Head
1
58
23
$4230.
$1035
Furnace
0
X
Water Heater
2
76
50
5266
4187
Furnace /Bath
0
Remodeling
3
45
26
6594
295
Insulation
2
X
1
83
54
1560
1535
Insulation
0
X.
1
.65
50
3291
1527
Roof
0
X
Insulation
1
62
50
4005
827
Elec./ Furn
0
X
Repairs
1
68
52
4855
2736
Plumbing
0
X
Insulation
1
84
48
3274
2174
Insulation
0
X
Roof Repair
3
34
56
5777
3765
Ingul. /Plbg.
2
X
Elec.
r
2
73
63
5090
2114
Elec /Insul.
0
1
83
68
3703
3400
Plumbing
0
X
1
68
34
.2493
3395
Plbg. /Insul.
.0
X
Roofing
1
86
38
2649
640
Stormdoor//repairs
0
X
1.5
68
47
$4060
$2123
85%
Average Age of Head of Household - 53
Average
Age of
Structure
-
37 years
Average
Gross
Income
-
.$5,003.00
Lowest Grant Awarded
-
$ 505.00
Highest
Grant
Awarded
-
.$4,905.00
No.
Age
Avg.
in
Heads
of
Gross
Avg.
Improve-
No. of
Female
Fam
Age
Home
Income
Award
ments
Children
Head
1
65
25
$4669
$ 905
Insul /Bath
0
2
67
17
4335
1558
Roofing
0
2
79
70
4695
4186
Roofing / Insul.
0
3
35
46
6480
1403
Insul. /Roof
2
X
2
33
22
3432
1363
Insul. /Windows
1
X
1
63
52
3968
2219.
Plbg / Insul
0
6
37
60
8455,
3511
Elec /Plbg/
5
X
Insulation
2
48
49
2941
4593
Elec /Plbg/
1
X
Windows
3
57
18
8338
527
Insulation
2
X
2
58
21
5451
505
Insulation
0
2
40
70
3432
4905
Insul /Plbg.
1
X
Elec /Paint
1
70
45
5349
1987
Furnace
0
X
3
41
15
4800
895
Insulation
2
X-
3
53
25
1037
1042
Windows /Bath
1
4
50
17
3003
654
Insulation
2
2,46
53
37
$5003
$2016
60%
PERCENT OF TOTAL LOAN NEEDED WHICH MAY BE OBTAINED FROM
CITY OF EDINA ($1,500 MAXIMUM)
ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME
$6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000 $11,000 .$12,000 $13,000 $14,000 $15,000 $16,000
or less or less or less or less or less or less or less or less or less or less or less
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
0
0
0
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
0
0
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
0
100
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
0
0
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
25
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
50
50
25
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
75
50
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100.-
75
75
50
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75
i
75
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
75 `
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
DPL
PHASE I STATISTICS
TALLY SHEET
Average
Age of Structure - 38
Average
Gross Income
- $10,430.00
Lowest DPL Awarded
- $
773.00
,
Highest
DPL Awarded
- $
1,500.00
Age
Avg.
#
of
Amt.
Int
Gross
Avg.
No. of
Female
Family
Home
Loan
Rate
Income
Award
Energy
Children
Head
3
25
$5500
5%
$11824:
$1500
X
2
X
5
21
2534
7%
15365
1500
3
2
26
800
3%
6775
1500
X
0
2
55
0
-
7632
1500
0
4
39
5500
6%
13980
1500
2
1
30
- 1552
2%
4388
1500
0
X
4
22
850
6%
13496
850
X
3
j
X
i
4
27
1161
6%
13480
1161
X
2
4
21
310
5%
11266
.930
�' X
2
• i
j
.2
38
1260
5%
11339
1260
X
0
6
30
500
6%
13240
1500
X
4
j
1
43
6800
4%
8000
1500
0
6
52
7500
7%
17126
1500
4
2
70
0
-
.6204
800
X
0
6
37
0
-
6445
1500
X
4
1
63
0
-
3574
1470
0
i
4
26
2395
6%
13875
1500
X
2
0
1
26
3183
4%
8460
1500
0
X
2
27
500
3%
6773
1500
0
X
3
56
0
-
5777
1235
2
X _...._ a
5
36
$1487
6%
$14833
$1487
4
X
3
75
3600
5%
11208
1500
2
X
3
40
2500
7%
14840
773
X
1
3.22
35%
38
$2084
5.2%
$10430
$1346
48%
DPL PHASE II STATISTICS
YR III MONEY
TALLY SHEET
Average
Age of Structure -
37
Average
Gross Income.
-
$10,679.00
Lowest Grant Awarded
-
$ 250.00
Highest
Grant Awarded
-
$ 11500.00
Age
Avg.
Family
Loan
of
Gross
City
No. of
Female
No.-
Amt.
Home
Income
Award
Energy
Children
Co -App.
Head
3
$ 680/3%
31
$ 9306
$1500
X
2
No
X
2
718/4%
22
10200
:1500
0
Yes
4
2554/7%
28
15660.
851
2
Yes
1
419/4%
31
8576
419.
X
0
No
X
6
200 -
30
10780
1500
X
4
Yes
2
0
70
3432
1400
5
1444/7%
71
18158
481
X
3
Yes
3
1420/4%
30
9600.
1500
X
2
No
X
1
340 -
40
7600
340
0
No
X
4
1853/6%
40
14202
.617
X
2
Yes
2
750/5%
20
12348
250
X
0
Yes
2
1750/4%
20
9905
1500
X
0
Yes
2
626/5%
26
11298
626
0
Yes
1
950/2%
36
5555
1500
X
0
No
2
292/4%
77
9213
.875
X
0
Yes
6
289/6%
30
.15465
867
5
No
X
2
0
51
3303
1220
0
No
X
2
13000/5%
65
12230
1500
1"
No
1
858/5%
23
11008
286
0
No
X
2
740/4%
26
9420
1500.
0
Yes
2
249 -
25
9044
747
0
Yes
3
2500/6%
40
14840
727
X
1
Yes
7
345/6%
19
20169
1034
X
5
Yes
1
$ 900/-
27
$ 7027
$1500
X
0
No
X
2
1584/4%
24
9976
1500
X
0
Yes..
4
685/4%
60
9346
1500
X
3
No
X
_2.76 .:
$1594/4.75%
37
$10679
$1048
58%
35%
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Three Housing Programs
B. Owner - Renter
C. Funding
II. MHFA GRANT PROGRAM
A. Securing Funding
1. Application - past performance
2. RDC (Metro Council) Review
3. MHFA Funding and Grant Funding Agreement
B. Program Priorities
1. Insulation
2. Major deficiencies
3. Extend life of dwelling units
C. Duties of Local Offices
1. Public outreach and advertising
2. Inspections before, during, and after completion-
of work
3. Counselling and assisting homeowners in cost
estimating, work write -ups and contractor bidding
4. Handling of all program forms and reporting to MHFA
5. Verification of applicants assets,.income, and property
.ownership
6. Submission of all necessary forms to MHFA for review and.
approval
7. Handling contractor - homeowner problems as they arise, and
payment to individual contractors upon satisfactory
completion of work.
D. Eligibility Requirements
1. Income of $5,000 or less
2. Assets of $25,000 or less, excluding homestead
3. Eligible property and improvements
Outline
Page 2
December 9,
1977
E.
Program Summary
(refer to grant statistical summaries in memo text)
III. DEFERRED LOAN /MHFA LOAN PROGRAM
A.
Two sources of funding
1. MHFA administered by Bank
2. CDBG administered by City
B.
Edina - First Edina Connection
1. Cash Rebate Program of 1976
2. DPL program tied to Bank funds as modeled
after Portland program
3. Cooperation is the key
C.
Eligible Homes and Homeowners
-
1. Income under $16,000
2. Sliding scale of City deferred loan. (Refer to -table
in memo showing percent of loan contributed by
City)
3. Home is over 15 years old or needs structural
or
energy improvements
4. Desired improvements are acceptable to MHFA
D.
Program Summary
(Refer to tables for DPL phases I & II in memo text)
IV. SECTION
8 RENTAL ASSISTANCE
A.
The different forms of Section 8
1. Existing - Private ownership
2. New - Private or public ownership
3. Substantially Rehabilitated - Private or public
ownership
B.
Section 8 in Edina
1. Existing - Metro Council
2. New - S.E. Edina
C.
Edina Staff Duties Under Section 8
1. Process applications - explain program.
2. Verify income, assets, medical expenses, etc.
3. Submission of forms to Metro HRA
4. Briefing tenants certified for participation
f
i.
Outline
Page 3
December 9, 1977
i
IV. C. Edina Staff Duties Under Section 8 (Continued)
5. Assist tenants in housing search
i
6. Inspection of apartments before occupancy
7. Monitoring and periodical recertification of tenants.
Reported monthly to Metro HRA
d:ks . i
i
i
i
i
(OFFICIAL PUBLICATION)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
TITLE I OF THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1974
BLOCK GRANT PROJECT DETERMINATION
Notice is hereby given that representatives of Hennepin County and the City
Council of Edina will hold public hearings regardi -ng proposed projects and
activities to be funded under Title I of the Housing and Community Develop -
ment Act of 1974. Citizen participation is required and requested. Copies
of the program guidelines are available at the office of the City Planner,
4801 West 50th Street.
Public hearings are scheduled for December 19, 1977, and January 9., 1978,
at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina,
Minnesota 55424.
These public hearings are being held pursuant to a joint cooperative agree-
ment between Hennepin County and participating municipalities under M.S.
47.1.59.
FLORENCE B. HALLBERG
CITY CLERK
Please publish in the Edina Sun on December 2 and December 16, 1977.
Please send two Affidavits of Publication.
71 -.4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes, City Planner
SUBJECT: Council Hearings on Year IV Community Development Block Grants
As required, we have scheduled two Council hearings for December 19, 1977 and
January 9, 1978, to receive comments and suggestions from commissions, boards,
civic groups and citizens regarding the allocation of the above referenced
funds. We have informed such commissions and groups of these hearings by
way of mailed notices. We have also published legal notices as well as
non -legal articles in the newspaper regarding these hearings.
On December 19, 1977, representatives of Hennepin County will be present to
explain various elements of the Community Development Block Grant program to
the Council. These representatives will also be available to answer any
questions from interested groups and individuals regarding the eligibility
of projects.
Due to the meeting dates of various boards, commissions, and organizations,
many of these groups have not as yet considered the Community Development
program. To date, we have not received any comments or suggestions regarding
the allocation of Community Development funds. Therefore, staff believes
that it would be premature to prepare a recommended allocation at this time.
At the second hearing on January 9, 1978, we would assume that all groups
have had adequate opportunity to consider the program and staff would
submit a recommended allocation at that time.
GLH:ks
cc: Mayor and Council
12/14/77