HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-05-17_COUNCIL MEETING(Revised)
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL.,
REGULAR MEETING
MAY 17, 1976
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
RECOGNITION OF CAMPFIRE GIRLS
RECOGNITION OF THREE EDINA CHAMPIONS
Miss U.S.A.
Stanley Cup Hockey Winner
American Senior Golf Titleist
MINUTES of May 3, 1976, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Pre -
sentation by City Manager and Engineer. Spectators heard. .If 'Counc'il wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution Ordering Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass.
A. Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -299 - Morningside Area served by Minneapolis
Water System
B. Storm Sewer Improvement No. P -ST.S -150 - Back lot lines Block 3, Viking
Hills 2nd Addition, and Block .1, Viking Hills 3rd Addition, Arctic Way
to 300' East (Continued.from 4/19/76)
C. Street Improvement No. P -BA -220 - W. 69th St. from France.Ave. to Xerxes
Ave. (Continued from 4/19/36 - Continue further to 6/21/76)
D. Traffic Signal Improvement No. P -TS -1 - W. 69th St. at York Ave. (Continued
from 4/19/76 - Continue further to 6/21/76)
E. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -19 - South side W. 69th Street from France
Avenue to Xerxes Ave. (Continued from 4/19/76 - Continue further to 6/21/76)
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ZONING.MATTERS Affidavits of .Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard., First Reading requires offering --of
ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading should r
be waived.
A. First Reading
1. kelvin Gittleman et al - Krahl Hill.- PRD -3 from R -1 Single Family
Residential District (Generally located South of Vernon Ave. and West
of Arctic Way)
2. *G. William Pearson - R -1 Residential District to R -2 Multiple Residential
District (Generally located South of Vernon Avenue and West of Gleason
Road) Z -76 -3 (4/28/76)
3. Harliev Helle - R -1 Single Family Residential District to R -2 Multiple
Residential District (Generally located South of Vernon Ave. and
West of Gleason Road) Z -76 -4 (4/28/76)
4. E. G. Thernell - N.-.6' of Lot 2,-Block.1, Killarney Shores -•.R -1
Residential District to R -2 Multiple Residential. District -- Z -76 -6
(4/28/76)
5. Nelson Smith & Associates - Plat 61060, Parcel 5000 (4536 France Ave. S.)
.R -1 Single Family Residence District to C -2 Cpmmercial District
Z -76 -2 (3/31/76) Ordinance No. 811 -A72
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLATS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presenta-
tion by Planning Department. Spectators heard. Action of Council by Resolu-
tion. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Mark Nelson First Addition - 4536 France Ave. S. - S -76 -4 (4/28/76)
B. Braemar Court - Generally located West of Cahill Road and South of W. 70th St.
S -76 -5 (4/28/76)
IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON
Spectators heard.
vote to pass.
A. G. William Pe.
Gleason Road
B. Harleiv Helle
Gleason Road)
LOT DIVISIONS Presentation by Planning Department.
Action of Council by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall
arson (Generally located South of Vernon Avenue and Wei-,t of
- LD -76 -2 (4/28/76)
(Generally located South of Vernon Avenue and West of
LD -76 -3 (4/28/76)
May. 17, 1976, Agenda
Page Two
V._ AWARD OF BIDS . Tabulation and ,'Recommendations by City Manager. Action of
',Council by Motion.
A. Public Improvements (Continued from 5/3/76)
B. Braemar Park Ballfield Electrical Installation
C. Braemar Park Ballfield Electrical-,Fixtures
D. 'Arden Park Shelter
VI. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Mr. Frank Dean - Dewey Hill Road Traffic
B.. Petitions
1. Storm Sewer Improvement - Block 3, Killarney Shores
2...100% Petition - Sanitary Sewer and Watermain to serve 3939 W. 50th St.
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
1. Final Plat Approval
a. Nagengast Addition - S -75 -9 (7/2/75) (N. of Doron Dr., S. of Crosstown)
B. Hennepin County Public Safety Communications Interim User Board (HECO) -
Continued from 5/3/76
C. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Annual Meeting - 5/19/76
D. National Crime Prevention.Institute
E. Board and Commission Appointments
F. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date
G. Taxicab Rates
H. Management Consulting for Public Safety
I. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 11,1976
VIII. ORDINANCES 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading.
A. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 311 -A7 - Dog Control Ordinance
IX. RESOLUTIONS
A. American Red Cross Voluntary Transportation Service
X. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
XI. FINANCE
A. Acquisition of Hume Property (Continued from 4/19/76)
B. Claims. Paid: Motion of seconded by for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List: General Fund, $51,466.73;
Park, $3,136.20; Park Construction, $709.07; Swimming Pool; $92.77; Golf,
$14,518.87;. Arena, $4,407.17; Gun Range, $696.06; Water Works, $7,790.59;
Sewer, $64,284.52; Liquor, $113,416.71; Construction, $64,926.59; Total,
.$325,445.28
HENNEPIN COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COUNCIL
312 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
Phone 348 -6497
MEMORANDUM
DATE: May 10, 1976
TO: - Hennepin County City Managers
FROM: John O'Sullivan, Director HCCJC
SUBJECT: Special Notice
CO- CHAIRMEN
THOMAS L. JOHNSON
THOMAS L. OLSON
VICE CHAIRMAN
JAMES E. SHAW
The National Crime Prevention Institute in Louisville, Kentucky, will conduct four
3 -day sessions titled "Crime Prevention for Public Policy- Makers, Police Adminis-
trators and Community Representatives." The sessions will take up program develop-
ment and evaluation for cities and counties that initiate or modify.comprehensive
crime - prevention programs.
Participants should come in teams of three: a chief elected official or his /her
designee, a top law- enforcement executive and a community representative. The three
members of the team will attend the same session. Sessions will be held May 10 -13,
May 24 -27, June 7 -10, and June 21 -24 at the Shelby Campus, University of Louisville.
The Institute will provide free housing. and reimburse travel expenses (through an
LEAA grant).
Local units of government interested in participating should submit letters of
application to: Director, National Crime Prevention Institute, University of Louis-
ville, Shelby Campus, Louisville, Kentucky 40222.
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS
WHEREAS, Neil C. Croonquist, a long time resident of the City of Edina,
has competed in numerous golf tournaments; and
WHEREAS, Neil Croonquist has won the Minnesota State Amateur and the
Interlachen Club Championship numerous times; and
WHEREAS,' Neil C. Croonquist has won the Alexandria Resorters' Tournament,
most recently in 1975; and
WHEREAS, Neil Croonquist has climaxed his golfing career by winning the
American Senior Golf Titleist Tournament in Clearwater, Florida;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby
offer its most sincere congratulations to
:NEIL C. CROONQUIST
for his outstanding sportsmanship and ability as an amateur golfer and
for the exemplary manner in which he has represented the City of Edina
in his athletic endeavors.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
0
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS
WHEREAS, William Nyrop was a member of one of the early. Edina High
School championship hockey teams, having been a product of the City
of Edina Park and Recreation Department hockey program and of the
Edina School system hockey program; and
WHEREAS, as a university student, William Nyrop contributed greatly
to the impressive record of victories of the Notre Dame Hockey Team;
and
WHEREAS, William Nyrop was chosen to become a member of the Montreal
Canadiens and, as a part of his meteoric hockey career, played well
in assisting the Canadiens in the winning of the Stanley Cup, which
is emblematic of professional hockey supremacy;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council extend
its most sincere congratulations to
WILLIAM NYROP
for his outstanding sportsmanship and ability as a hockey player
and for the exemplary manner in which he has represented the City of
Edina in his athletic endeavors.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
T2RCl1T TTTTOT%T
WHEREAS, the following described.tracts of land are now separate parcels:
The West 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition;
Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition; and
Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said
tracts of land so that the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's 5th
Addition is divided from Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason'.s 5th Addition and combined
with Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition and with Outlot B, Viking Hills
4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zon-
ing Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as combined in the above manner do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 811 and 801;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as combined in the above
manner is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
Nos. 811 and Ordinance 801 are hereby waived to allow said division and convey-
ance thereof as a separate tract of land -but are not waived for any other
purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcel unless made in
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this _Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE. OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify.that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1st day of June, 1976.
City Clerk
CitY% of dina
4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 63424
927 -8861
RESOLUTION -
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's Sth Addition; and
Lot 11, Block 1, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said
tracts of land so that Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition is added
to Lot 11, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zon-
ing Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as combined in the above manner do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 811 and 801;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcel- as combined in the above
manner is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
Nos. 811 and Ordinance 801 are hereby waived to allow said combination and con-
veyance thereof as a separate tract of land but are not waived for any other
purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcel unless made in
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1st day of June, 1976.
City Clerk
City' of Edina _ _ _ - `
4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 85424
927 -8861
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
The West 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition;
Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition; and
Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said
tracts of land so that the Westerly 10 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's 5th
Addition is divided from Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition and combined
with Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition and with Outlot B, Viking Hills
4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zon-
ing Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as combined in the above manner do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 811 and 801;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as combined in the above
manner is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
Nos. 811 and Ordinance 801 are hereby waived to allow said division and convey-
ance thereof as a separate tract of land but are not waived for any other
purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcel unless made in
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERIC
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1st day of June, 1976.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into a Joint Powers
Agreement with Hennepin,Emergency Communications Organization
(HECO).
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
meeting of May 17, 1976, and as recorded in the minutes of said
regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of June, 1976.
City Clerk
JAMES P. LARKIN
ROBERT L. HOFFMAN
JACK F. DALY
D. KENNETH LINDGREN
ROBERT B. WHITLOCK
ALLAN E.'PAT'MULLIGAN
ROBERTJ.HENNESSEY
RONALD R. FLETCHER
EDWARD J. DRISCOLL
ARTHUR MACK
JAMES C. ERICKSON
GENE N. FULLER
ROBERT W. JUNGHANS
JOSEPH W. ANTHONY
RICHARD N. DAVIES
DAVID C. SELLERGREN
JOHN D. FULLMER
April 26, 1976
LARKIN, HOFFvIAN, DAI;Y & I.INDGRI N, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CENTER
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431
TELEPHONE (612) 635 -3800
City Clerk of the City of Edina
and the Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Re: Krahl Hill Property
Our File \o. 5916 -00
Gentlemen:
L —D
OF COUNSEL
JOSEPH GITIS
On behalf of Gittleman Corporation, Melvin C. Gittleman and Karl H. Krahl, we request
that there be placed upon the agenda of the Edina City Council at its next regular meeting
the following items:
1 On March 31, 1976, the District Court of Hennepin County entered its order for
Judgment herein declaring my client's right to have the subject property rezoned in
accordance with their earlier application herein and the Western Edina Land Use
Plan;
2 and further directing the Edina City Council to approve the Gittleman Plan residential
district development proposal in light of its findings and conclusions and the fore-
going rezoning.
We respectfully request that the Edina City Council proceed in accordance with the Court's
judgment and grant the rezoning and approval of the planned residential district development
proposal at its next regular meeting.
Further delay in this matter will only result in additional loss to my clients because of the
need for prompt commencement of construction to take advantage of the season. Delay may also
cause an increase in the cost of construction.
LARKIN, HOIFF'MAN, I)ALY & LINDGREN, LTD.
City Clerk of the City of Edina
and the Edina City Council
April 26, 1976
Page Two
-:7- 1--)
My clients have been notified by notice dated April 15, 1976, that on May 3, 1976 the
Council's intention to consider "a proposed clarification of allowed multi - family densities
in the Western Edina Plan area ". We understand that the Council has advised that such
consideration will not effect the Krahl hill. We would like to make clear our position
that any attempt to lower permissible densities on the Krahl hill by modification of the
Western Edina Plan would be an obvious attempt to circumvent the Court's judgment.
Sincerely,
00for
lN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
DORSEY, MARQUART, WINDHORST, WEST 8, HALLADAY —,,r_,4
DO HALO WEST
JOHN 5, HIBBS
2300 F IRS T NATIONAL B A N K BUILDING
THOMAS R MANTHET
W'ALDO F. MARQUART
ROBERT O. FLOTTEN
WILLIAM R. HIBBS
JONN W. WINDHORST
JOHN D. LEVINE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 5 5 4 0 2
PHILIP F. BOCLTER
HENRY HALLADAY
JULE M. HANNAFORD
ROBERT J. STRUYK
MICHAEL A OLSON
WILLIAM B. PAYNE
ROBERT A HEIBERG
ARTHUR B. WHITNEY
P.USSELL W. LINDOUIST
LARRY W JOHNSON
THOMAS S HAY
(gl2) 340 -2600
JOHN D KIRBY
P.A SCHWARTZBAUER
DAVID R. BRINK
G LARRY GRIFFITH
DAVID N. FRONEK
HORACE HITCH
CRAIG A BECK
THOMAS IN TINKHAM
VIRGIL H. HILL
OAVND L MCCUSKE•
CABLE: DOROW
JON F TUTTLE
ROBERT V TARBOX
THOMAS O. MOE
TELEX: 29 -0605
EMERY W.BARTLE
ROBERT J. JOHNSON
JAME5 M OHAGAN
WILLIAM&JOHNSTONE
M.B HASSELOUIST
JOHN M MASON
TELECOPIER: (612) 340-2868
JOHN P. VITKO
PETER DORSEY
MICHAEL W WRIGHT
STEVEN K. CHAMPOP
GEORGE P. FLAN NERY
LARRY L. WCKREY
DON D CARL SON
CURTIS L ROY
LOREN R. KNOTT
1468 W -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
MICHAEL J. RADMER
ARTHUR E. WEISSERG
PHILLIP H MARTIN
ST. PAU L, MINNESOTA SS 101
PAUL J. SCHEERER
DUANE E. JOSEPH
REESE C JOHNSON
(612) 227-8017
DAN F NICOI
JAMES B. VESSEY
CHARLES J, HAUENSTEIN
MICHAEL TRUCANO
WILLIAM A WHITLOCK
CHARLES A GEER
-
WILLIAM J KEPPEL
E J. SCHWARTZBAUER
JOHN C. ZWAKMAN
JONATHAN VILLAGE CENTER
KENNETH IVERSON
THOMAS M. BROWN
CORNELIUS D. MAHONEV
JOHN R. WICKS
EUGENE L JOHNSON
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318
JAMES A FLADER
DAVID LBOEHNEN
THOMAS S. ERICKSON
JOHN W. WINDHORST. J�
(612) 448-4012
LAWRENCE R. OL IVER
WILLIAM C. BABCOCK
MICHAEL PRICHAR7
FRANK H VOIGT
MICHAEL E BRESS
WILLIAM R SOTH
WILLIAM E. MARTIN
RAYMOND A, ROSTER
JOHN J. TAYLOR
RICHARD G SWANSO`.
FAITH L.OHMAN
115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST
WILLIAM H HIPPEE,JR.
ROBERTA BURNS
BERNARD G HUNZEN
DAVID A RANHEIM
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901
TONI A SEITZ
WILLIAM J HEMPEL
ROBERT J. SILVERMAN
(507) 288 -3156
MICHELA 1.4FOND
April 27, 1976
James P. Larkin, Esq.
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55431
Re: Krahl Hill Property
Your File No. 5916 -00
Dear Mt.. Larkin:
-a_- 1)
BRADFORD L FERGUSON
ROGER J. MAGNUSON
J- ROBERT HIBBS
JAY F COOK
STANLEY M. REIN
CHARLES L POTUZNIK
VERLANE L ENDORF
DENNIS BURATTI
GEORGEANN BECKER
ROBERT HOBBINS
PARRY D GLAZER
PETER HENDRIXSON
NICKY R. HAY
IRVING WEISER
STEPHEN GOTTSCHALK
THOMAS ELKINS
KENNETH J. CUTLER
DAVID OUINLAN ,
JAMES PIELEMEIER
GARY M. JOHNSON
THOMAS W FINN
LYNN KROMINGA
JAY LBENNETT
OF COUNSEL
GEORGE E ANDERSON
ROBERT L VANFOSSEN
The City of Edina is in receipt of your letter of April 26, 1976,
relative to the above matter.
Please be advised that the Krahl Hill rezoning matter will come
before the City Council at its May 17, 1976 meeting. This will be the first
meeting of the City Council at which it will be possible to hear this matter;
the City Council, by policy, holds its public hearings at the second meeting .
of each month, and it is necessary, so I have advised the Council, to publish
notice of this hearing. At that meeting the Council will be considering
the preliminary approval of the Krahl Hill rezoning. If preliminary ap-
proval is granted, the applicant must then proceed to prepare the overall
development plan for the property and then obtain the final approval by
the Planning Commission and the Council, all pursuant to City Ordinance No.
811, Sec. 5 (Planned Residential District).
TSEE /abc
cc:� Ms. Florence B. Hallberg
William J. Hempel, Esq.
Mr. Warren C. Hyde
Mr. Greg J. Luce
Very truly yours,
J(1a s S. Erickson
HENNEPIN EMERGENCY COMMUNICATION ORGANIZATION
AGREEMENT.SUMMARY
l.- Members agree to joint participation in the development of
a county -wide integrated emergency communications network
that provides the maximum possible local command,control
.and ownefship consistent with existing legislation.
2. The name of the organization is "Hennepin Emergency
Communications Organization; HECO".
3. Any governmental unit or °combination of units which has
authority to render police, fire or medical public safety
services and which employs not less than ten full -time
sworn law enforcement personnel may be a member. The
Hennepin County Sheriff and Hennepin County can both
qualify as members.
4. The agreement is effective and the organization is initially
created upon execution and filing by Hennepin County, the
�> Hennepin County Sheriff, the City of Minneapolis and seven
other eligible municipalities.., The first meeting is to be
called by the Sheriff and held within 45 days after the
agreement is effective.
5. The governing body of the organization is the Board of
Directors. Each member is eligible for one director. The
president of the Board of Directors shall be the Sheriff;
the initial vice - president shall be from the members who
are currently "independents ". Members of-the Board of
Directors shall have one vote except where weighted voting
is provided under the following circumstances:
a) Adoption of by -laws relating to cost sharing criteria.
b) Voting on budget.
6. The weighted voting system provides for a weighting of
votes based on the combination of population and assessed
valuation with special provision to allow ten per cent of
the total vote on a weighted basis to be cast by the Sheriff
and ten per cent of the total vote on a weighted basis to be
cast by Hennepin County. For purposes of this section,
population shall be the most recent Metropolitan Council
estimates and assessed valuation shall be the most recent
assessed valuation certified by the State Board of Equalization.
AGREEMENT SUMMARY
Page Two
7. As of July 1; 1978, a director who represents a municipality
which as of that date has not assigned or otherwise transferred
to the organization public safety radio frequencies that it has
licensed to it., shall not be eligible for election to any office
in the'organization or to serve on the executive committee.
A director of such a community also, after July, 1978, shall not
be entitled to a. vote on matters pertaining to the budget or the
maintenance and operation of joint facilities which do not serve
the.residents of that. community.
8. The Executive Committee shall be made up of three Officers plus -
two other Directors.' One of the officers or directors shall be
a representative of the City-of Minneapolis. The Sheriff is
automatically the-president-of the organization.
9. The Board of Directors, with delegation as provided to the
Executive Committee, shall have the power to employ personnel
and to establish an integrated.communications system. This
authority includes centralization to -a single dispatch organi-
zation, or clusters.or other integrated mechanisms. The authority
includes the authority to hire personnel, to enter into contracts,
and generally to operate public safety communications systems for
public safety purposes.
10. Costs are to be allocated in accordance with formulas to be
established from time to time through the By -Laws of the Board
of Directors. This allows the weighted voting system to apply
to changes in the financing criteria. For the first year and
until changed by the Board, costs shall be allocated as follows:
a) The County EMS costs and Sheriff's costs shall be paid .
by the County in proportion based on the number of mobile
radio units serving the Sheriff and .EMS staff compared to
the total number of mobile units serving all members.
b) Municipal members shall pay costs charged to them proportioned
one -half on the basis of population and one -half on the basis
of valuation.
c) Excluded from the above cost allocations shall be non -
grant capital costs and continuing operating costs of
a "911" emergency telephone system to a central point
or to selectively routed locations, if less costly and
consistent with long -range development plans. -' Such costs
shall be paid by the County'Board through a county -wide
levy or through the initiation of a telephone user tax.
Also excluded shall be the costs of developing a central
facility for dispatching to serve the whole county and
development of central computer capabilities for dis-
patching purposes when such development is recommended
AGREEMENT SUMMARY
Page Three
by the HECO Board and at such time as that recommen-
dation is accepted by the Hennepin County Board. Also
excluded shall be special capital and operating costs
incurred because of a request by an individual member;
these costs shall be paid by such members.
11 Associate member status is provided for and a mechanism is'
provided for withdrawal of a member and dissolution of the
organization. The withdrawal provisions allow withdrawal
if the resulting frequency loading on the integrated system
is not detrimental. Dissolution occurs if the members
represent less than one- third.of the total population of the
County -or if dissolution is recommended by a two- thirds vote
of the Executive Committee and approved by a two- thirds vote
of all members of the Board.
BES /smb
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS
INTERIM USER BOARD
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE
041975
MEMORANDUM
"WHY SHOULD YOUR COMMUNITY ENTER INTO
THE PROPOSED HECO AGREEMENT ?"
ti
Within Hennepin County, there are.over fifty delivery
systems that provide public safety services to various
segments of the county population. The County and each City
is directly concerned with delivery of police and•fire
services. The County and each City is concerned with the
level of emergency medical service response to citizens
through the combined private and public hospital EMS system.
With all of this concern, there is also a major desire
to maintain as much direct community control over the level
and costs of public safety service as possible.
are:
The fundamental functions of public safety communications
1. To connect the citizen in need of emergency service
with the agency which can respond to his problem
as quickly and as efficiently as possible;
2. To assist public safety agency personnel in their
response capability.
The technology that is currently available to provide
public safety communication functions is changing rapidly.
This change requires decisions by agency administrators and
policy makers that involve very complex questions of allocation
of resources (i.e., money and radio frequencies), changes in
service delivery systems and changes in the level of service
available.
Over the past three years, most of the governmental
units within Hennepin County have been involved in joint
study and analysis of the public safety communications
systems within the County. These studies show:
1. A virtually unanimous desire to develop "911"
telephone service capability throughout the
County;
2. A need to re- allocate radio frequencies for public .
safety purposes to more efficiently use this
limited resource;
0.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS
INTERIM USER BOARD
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION COMMITTEE
041975
MEMORANDUM
"WHY SHOULD YOUR COMMUNITY ENTER INTO
THE PROPOSED HECO AGREEMENT ?"
ti
Within Hennepin County, there are.over fifty delivery
systems that provide public safety services to various
segments of the county population. The County and each City
is directly concerned with delivery of police and•fire
services. The County and each City is concerned with the
level of emergency medical service response to citizens
through the combined private and public hospital EMS system.
With all of this concern, there is also a major desire
to maintain as much direct community control over the level
and costs of public safety service as possible.
are:
The fundamental functions of public safety communications
1. To connect the citizen in need of emergency service
with the agency which can respond to his problem
as quickly and as efficiently as possible;
2. To assist public safety agency personnel in their
response capability.
The technology that is currently available to provide
public safety communication functions is changing rapidly.
This change requires decisions by agency administrators and
policy makers that involve very complex questions of allocation
of resources (i.e., money and radio frequencies), changes in
service delivery systems and changes in the level of service
available.
Over the past three years, most of the governmental
units within Hennepin County have been involved in joint
study and analysis of the public safety communications
systems within the County. These studies show:
1. A virtually unanimous desire to develop "911"
telephone service capability throughout the
County;
2. A need to re- allocate radio frequencies for public .
safety purposes to more efficiently use this
limited resource;
3. A very fundamental desi-re.among communities to
participate and to have an effective voice in the
decisions which will establish the level of public
safety communications services and in the allocation
of the costs for these services.
In light of all of the above, the Interim User Board
has developed the proposed HECO Joint Powers Agreement.
It is impossible at this time to accurately estimate
the costs which will be involved for each community as a
result of its membership because the organization must make
initial decisions-.which will develop projects and a budget
with which to perform those projects. It does appear that
the initial decisions will involve development of the "911"
telephone system. It also appears that the costs of that
system, exclusive of the proposed County levy, should not
exceed the amounts currently expended by individual. communities
for emergency telephone connections. Thus, at least for the
first year or two, the costs to be assessed against a
community should involve only its share of basic administrative
staff and planning costs. The ultimate protection each
community has with respect to the level of costs is its
right to withdraw from the organization and its programs
pursuant.to the terms of the Agreement.
Notwithstanding the cost uncertainties, each eligible
governmental unit in Hennepin County should join the proposed
organization because it will provide:
1. An opportunity for each community that has sig-
nificant public safety agency responsibility to
participate directly in the development of the
design and operating policies for a "911 "'system.
2. A forum for working out an equitable re- allocation
of public safety radio frequencies.
3. A forum for analyzing specific new technology
potentials and a mechanism for using those potentials
on a'joint basis with appropriate cost sharing
considerations.
4. A structure which will continue joint and cooperative
analysis which should assist in getting Federal
dollars involved.
5. A balanced and equitable political setting for
decisions on level of service and cost sharing.
Increasingly, the benefits of new public safety communications
technology appear to become less costly if shared among several
communities. There is a need for a formal structure within
Hennepin County which can pursue the joint use of new communications
capabilities on behalf of the citizens in a manner which will
protect individual community.concerns.
- 2 -
7
lJ- ; 4-APEL -HILL I
L—, .
7c c GATIONAL c
is
A_P'Tl C AY
V
w y
MC.
CA fiL
L Er
A L
i c�6ssviF-vi
-JUUTHERAN
C RE-F K V_T L t:
RK'
7
zif-Nning
k-Y
REQUEST NUMBER: - -7, -711 - 8
LOCATION:
RFQUEST: P-1 _S'2712
D-1 strict to pTiy)_3 Planned Residcnt`�i
District - for -apartments. - -
&--irtMf nt
A
EDINA PLA3INING COMNISSI0N
STAFF REPORT
March 27, 1974
Z-74 -8 Mr. Melvin C. Gittleman. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue
and west of Arctic Way. (Karl Krahl Hill) R -1 Single Family Residence
District to PRD -3 Planned Residential District.
Refer to: Project booklet titled "Highmoor of Edina" and staff memo
from Warren C. Hyde to the City Council.
This request is for the now famous Karl Krahl hill. After .three years or debate
as to whether this site should be used as multiple family at 12 units per acre
as shown in the Western Edina Land [)se Plan, the prononent yielded to u hat
were apparent neighborhood desires and proposed a single family subdivision.
After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission approved the single _family
subdivision, with some members dissenting. The Council, in part based on their
recommendation, and testimony from the neighborhood,. concurred and approved the
plat. Followina these approvals, Mr. Krahl began to tag and remove trees from
the right of way. Those neighbors with an environmental conscience then loudly
complained-to the staff and Council that this was.in fact a desecration and a
further study of some cluster type of housing should be had.
The staff report attached from Mr. Hyde to the Council reviews thoroughly those
meetings vie have had with all interested parties. The Council then ordered the
Planning staff to accept a petition for rezoning for this site even though the
one year waiting period between denials, as required by ordinance, has not vet
lapsed.
Recommendation: Every fact, except to note that the Western Edina Plan indicates
12 units per acre for this site, is fully col!ered in the project booklet. It
should be especially noted, however, that this nr000sed density is nine units per
acre, which falls about enual distance between the 12 units per acre in the Western
Edina Plan and the four units per .acre allowed for single family home development.
The staff would recommend approval of the concept only for this development because
of the significant amount of vegetation which can be preserved and because it is
in conformance with the Western Edina Land Use Plan.
GL:ln
3/22/74
CITY OF EDINA
✓� March 15, 1974
TO MAYOR AND COUNCIL
SUBJECT: KRANS. HILL
This memo will attempt to summarize the positions of various parties concerned
with future land development in the area south of Vernon Avenue, north of the
Crosstown Highway and east of Highway 18. Included are parcels controlled by
Karl Krahl, Robert Hanson, the Edina Ma sonic Lodge, State and County highway
departments and Partnership Investments, Inc. The latter corporation controls
the seven acres just east of the Masonic Lodge site. Also interested is the
Viking Hills Homeowners Association as represenred by Mr. Pi.eczentkowski and
Mrs. Dencker.
At the Council meeting of March 18,' you will consider whether the provisions
of Ordinance 811 -A28 should be waived so that a new development proposal by
Melvin Gittelman for the Krahl hill could be accepted for study. At the Janu-
ary 21 meeting, after the City Attorney advised that there must be.a change
of conditions or new evidence affecting the lan-, you decided after discussion
that no change of conditions or new evidence was present.
Early in February, Kark Krahl began removing trees from his property in prepa-
ration for a 20 -lot single- family home plat, as ?reliminarily approved by the
Council August 20, 1973. This precipitated a letter of February 16 to the
Council from Mrs. Dencker raising several questions about the right of Krahl
to proceed.
On Friday, March 1, Mayor Van Valkenburg cal ceodsaimee�rngLuce�,rMr. Dunn sa Krahl,
Robert Hanson, Mrs. Dencker and Mr. Pieczent
also attended. At this time, ttr. 'Pieczentkowski indicated that if more of the
hill and trees could be saved by a new multiple development with less density
than those previously rejected, and if Vernon were cul -de -sated just west of
Walnut Drive and any multiple building was at least two hundred feet from the
west line of Viking Hills, roost of the neighbor ^ood objections to previous
multiple projects would probably be withdrawn.
Mr. Hanson showed a preliminary plan for double bungalows on the strip of land .
north of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason and immediately south of
Viking Hills. He had obtained the plan from Partnership Investments, Inc.,
f.
the owners of that piece. The tentative.name �cr the development is "The
y can scar. b City r° resentativ °s.
WiWindings". This plan lia4 n0� pr�Jiclisl' b- J p`
ings". indicated that prin�;pals of Partners'.^.i? Investments had assured
him they would cooperate in making, it possible to h --v e the long - discussed
local street from Gleason, northwesterly to Vernon, roughly parallelir. the
Crosstown and the rarp from the Crosstown nart�;esterly to 18. The plan shoran
for "The 'Winding,` indicated a private, n:3rrow dead-end road. Mr. Hanson also
:'- rsation with the "head of the
ave the impression that in a fairly recent con
g
KRAHL HILL
Page Two
Hennepin County Highway Department ", he had been informed that all that was
needed to secure the County's cooperation in making portions of its land
available for the proposed road was for the City to so request.
Mr. Hanson further indicated that he still wanted some commercial zoning for
some of his land in this area, and I•fr. Pieczentkowski and Mrs. Dencker advised
that they had no objection to such zoning. The cul- de- sacing of Vernon may
enter into this also. This came as a_ surprise, and I reminded them of the
history of the Western Edina plan which originally proposed such usage, but
which was resoundingly rejected by a majority of the residents in that area,
and which was accordingly removed from the plan when the Council approved it.
At the Council meeting I -larch 4, Mayor Van Valkenburg reported on the above
meeting, and it was decided to reconsider the possibility of waiving the pro-
visions of Ordinance 811 -A28 at the March 18 meeting. Following that decision,
I suggested the possibility of my arranging an informal session with all con-
cerned. A day or two later, however, after having given the matter considerable
thought, it seemed to me that it would be more productive if at a staff level
we met with the parties concerned individually. I so advised Mayor Van Valken -_
burg and proceeded to meet with the following:
1. Melvin Gittleman, March
2. Partnership Investments,
3. Herbert Klossner, County
6
Inc., ,larch 8
Highway Engineer, March 13
Mr. Gittleman showed preliminary plans to Robert Dunn, Greg Luce and myself
for a development of three buildings, each with 24 units, plus a recreation
building and a tennis court. This is the project which could be considered
if you waive the ordinance provisions. with a total of 72 units, the density
would be about nine per acre. Mr. Gittleman pointed out that only about one -
third of the present trees would be destroyed and about one -third of the area
disturbed by grading. This contrasts with anywhere from 70 -80 percent tree
removal and area disturbance in the present approved plan for Krahl's single -
family development. Mr. Gittleman was questioned as to his figures and will,
furnish further details later to prove them. On the plan shown, the closest
building to the present Viking Hills property line was 75 feet. Mr. Gittleman
said he could not meet the 200 foot minimum recuested by Mr..Pieczentkowski
and Mrs. Dencker, but could move the closest building so that its closest point
would be 90 feet from the property line. He - pointed out on a plan that because
of -the topography and preserved vegetation, the line of sight from 'Mrs. Dencker's
property would not be violated. He felt that this was more important than the
horizontal distance. He felt that to meet the 200 foot demand would result in
spoiling his concept as it would move the building more into the lower part of
the property.
Mr. Fred Katter of Creative housing, Mr. David ''Kirscht, and Mr. Mike O'Rourke
of Partnership Investments, Inc., met with Greg Luce and me. They showed the
K&AHL HILL
Page Three
same plan as had.been shown by Mr. Hanson but stated that it was not final.
This contemplates 40 -45 double - bungalow units on about seven acres. Their
proposed road is 24 feet wide. If a public road is necessary, they would
prefer that 1/2 of the right -of -way be on County /State property. If a
public road wider than 24 feet is necessary and has to go only on their land,
it would create serious setback problems. "The Windings" is ready to start
as soon as the road pattern is settled.
Mr. Dunn and I met with Mr. Klossner at his office. It was his understanding
from a fairly recent conversation with Mr. Hanson that Mr. Hanson wants to
put a road at least partly on a 0.93 acre triangle owned by the County. This
triangle could be purchased from the County for $25,000, and any road develop-
ment would have to provide for storm drainage in pipe through the triangle.
Mr. Klossner stated that he did not tell Mr. Hanson that the City should merely
request the County for a road. Briefly, the County and State have no objection
to the construction of a frontage road as long as it is built off County and
State right -of -way. It is probable that the present Village Task Force will
recommend the need for some additional street in this general area.
In sucrmary, I feel that the possibility of Mr. Gittleman being able to secure
another option from Mr. Krah1 which would allow the City time to consider re-
zoning for a development of 72 units which would disturb only one -third of
the trees and area, as opposed to two - thirds or more under the Krahl single -
family plan, does constitute new evidence and that there has been a change of
conditions.
WCH /hd
Warren C. Hyde.
City Manager
KARL KRAHL PROPERTY
1 -6 -71 Planning Commission - request for rezoning from R -1 to R -4 was
accepted for study with a comprehensive site analysis including
detailed grading and landscaping plans required before approval
is granted.
3 -3 -71 Planning Commission - Proposal for 5 two -story buildings was
accepted for study. r
8 -2 -72 Planning Commission - Rezoning request from R -1 to PRD -3 (52 unit
townhouse development) continued to September meeting.
9 -6 -72 Planning Commission - Rezoning request (52 unit townhouse develop-
ment) continued indefinitely.
11 -1 -72 Planning Commission - Rezoning and subdivision requests (51 unit
townhouse development) denied; staff should give developer /owner
some direction as to type of development that would be allowed
on the site.
12 -6 -72 Planning Commission - Rezoning and subdivision requests (apartment
building) continued to January meeting.
1 -3 -73 Planning Commission - Architect Frank was encourage to take the plan
(93 unit apartment building) into its revised stage and come back
at next meeting; g_ra,te_d _concept approval subject to refinements dis-
cussed being made and met; motion reflects Planning Commission's
reservations regarding the_12.unit per acre density proposed.
2 -5 -73 Village Council - Request (93 unit apartment building) referred to
Environmental Quality Commission and Metropolitan Council for recom-
mendations; continued to March meeting.
2 -12 -73 Edina Environmental Quality Commission - Recommended that concept
approval be given the proposed development provided that final
development, grading plans and detailed proposals for construction
of retaining walls, etc..be presented and approved by EQC prior to
issuance of final approval by Village Council.
3 -5 -73 Village Council - Developer agreed to 60 day delay to enable him to
present a new proposal for the property; continued.
5 -7 -73 Village Council - Referred matter to Planning Commission for its
report.
7 -2 -73 Village Council - Hearing for rezoning from R -1 Residential District
to PRD -3 Residential District set for July 16, 1973; plan to be con-
sidered is plan gra4.ed concept approval by Planning Commission on
January 3, 1973. hI'
aft M
7 -16 -73 Village Council - Proposed rezoning was denied because density
is too great, there are traffic problems in the area and coverage
is too great for such a unique site.
7 -30 -73 Edina Environmental Quality Commission - Recommends they oppose
proposed platting into single - family lots.
a�� 3 sou ;��,�.:: t/ l•
1 -21 -74 City Council - Request of Gittleman to allow a new petition for
rezoning to be filed was denied.
2 -25 -74 City Council - matter continued to March 3, 1974.
3 -3 -74 City Council - hearing set for 3 -18 -74 for petition to deny or
permit a petition for rezoning.
3 -18 -74 City Council - Petition for rezoning permitted to be filed; petition
to rehear petition for rezoning Karl Krahl property within one year
was approved..
3 -27 -74 Planning Commission - Requested rezoning and concept (72 unit con-
dominium project) presented was approved contingent on the establish-
meet of the Vernon Avenue cul -de -sac.
4 -15 -74 City Council - Petition for PRD -3 zoning denied.
t
Czk,�,,TION e — —
dc
u � I
OLINGER BLVD.
LAN ( :Cl1NTRY:—
$-N PIPER :PARK fp '
COURT r -
X91 �� o
IFIRE STATION _ 4 __ p
T Lill
It
iALLEYO
CREEK VALLEY : ► c 4 v`
BAPTIST f G
C0
�; ''" • L . ' `'•. rte% / E
A.
• = cIR. 6.4 PARK'
• 66 TN T.
orision
subdix,
REQUEST NLI31BER : S -75 -9
S of the Crosstown Highway
LOCATION: & N of Doran Drive.
REQUEST: 3 lot single family
subdivision.
il1n�P�� nnn'Itl� dcc�nrin —nt 011PIKe of rd;T1
de
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 2, 1975
S -75 -9 Nagengast Addition. Generally located north of Doran
Drive and south of the Crosstown Highway.
Refer to: May 28, 1975, staff report and amended plat.
The Planning Commission may recall that this matter was held over
pending the vacation request for part of Valley View Road. This
matter has received favorable action by the City Council. The
result is larger lots, especially lot 1 which needed additional
square footage because it has three street frontages.
The staff would recommend approval contingent on a 5% parkland
dedication as per attached report (part of May 28 staff report).
GL.: In
6/27/75
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
May 28, 1975
S -75 -9 Nagengast Addition. Generally located south of the Crosstown
Highway and north of Doran Drive.
Attached: survey showing proposed vacation, and subdivision
dedication report.
The proponents are requesting a three lot subdivision with lot sizes from
11,800 square feet to 13,600 square feet. The surrounding lots vary from
12,450 to 17,000 square feet, with two very large lots backing up to Nine
Mile Creek in the one acre size range. Two outlots are also being created -
which will presumably be connected to an existing lot, which would benefit
from the land addition.
A part of Valley View Road is now being considered for vacation. If this
is accomplished, that land should be platted in whith proposed lot 3 so
the house could be located in a more desirable location and lot 1 could be
enlarged..
Recommendation: Staff would recommend the proposal be tabled pending the
outcome of the requested street vacation. .
GL:ln
5/22/75
tPRELIMINA V PLAT
NAGE.I�IGAS-C • ADD1`TiOtA
J � OW "�R O Otvt�OPER 1
f" (� V A G F}� e J. J. NAGENGAST
5712 C.Rf-EK VALLL`f RO•
` EOINA. MN- ee "s•
Gs d
0• RD G.
`
0.,.1.1 1'•ae �� .'. ,� � � � .
/ \ DORON LANE
' ... 1.1 � ... • �' � 1� < _ i 11 `•/ / ,' i.; _ G[1ltllw� Ne7g3�
•f p• \ \M 1 ft•Nl'• A/Wt•w
/I, J IO N H. 1 ;1 ` 11,000 i. fl 1 • /• /' ' M • i _.. •� ; ,` A•.• \.O r..
r • . 1; • 1
• Il 1i� '.\ . • • �� / k i' 1 f� A 11 f. VI.1,• a 0.•..••1• C•uw•w. M V www.• r►
, \• i w,.^ t: :. .,. •,•: �A ... w l•w•� . r.a • 10 M 6•wvw•
•'r` \ •., R k• 1x,100 S4 t1 i, 12,x50 fiQ. „. sl .... w! a•••IwO .1l •••••• tiM•.
Q i Jsw S ` • • "D •� •O • �/ •) O•w.\ M••a . 7Y ✓ uw.•••f .,•ww•1• M .w.w \.M
• .� 1 •\ Q .: �. _ 1 .. V•rl•f V.••.• RA. V••• ••f \N 1, ela C
• ' .,•� •,'• `� \`vQ '0••�J� l / . • • I � Fq•••d \i M•f If1t
ci 1 Si.toe rt• to
e • w•• 1, 'ti. 1,. •
ft.
t 1 1f t•.
,.eee . Vt. I • �1
• . 11.x. � r
r A1CMfiCO �'f 1
RO`f J. MANSE"
%,AwO A K.T.V00.
. .. 1x107 V1\lt•o �A•IC "LID.
. ,1Q.Ml%It. Mw. x91•!
.. •.wr.c va aa,e
_ _...._. _.._... ..•.r ,w:+.v:�4.u.d.: i,- ,,,,wyy,:..,:�jr,p:tirr' Jar::: 1. J..:..r.WJli.s''�'3...•'+li:�. �,;., w...,...- _......... ...•..._._
PRELIMINARY PLAT
NAGENGAST. ADDITION
OMNCK O DEVELOPERt
J. J. NAGENGAST
' 5712 CREEK VALLEY RD.
N2 1 EDINA• MN. rr+.sr
CO.
r Y:
- �' iii ���� � � 11 � / TT •�.n.\ / /e ;•� / �' I
�� �� `�� Is.Teo.sa�►. / /!� a ItOtoy.h
�� %�i 1. i 11 ._J\ � �•• ; �I ,�. j+ �` -/ L— �1_•.1_�— i ��E}1 ..1•
DOROM LANE
o w. ISspo M + 1� t,• {•1 MY►q•1•n • M •1 OYNM 1 � Or11h /MtlNwr
Ms T• '''
T A..• - \A Aug
•I/ Iw\ II il�f l•.- y I'i ♦ /
110 /• / ,( lT I • '� TN�t 1M. - 1
tj
Il it •.\.' �./ ,/� ��j / ( �'\ A5 Mlwlw.11n. 1H Mr - 11,000 M•Ir•
>
* \/ / ` / w,loe s{ M I /f r) I% w ..a�> U, �-4 w. t+ •~
I A S It,•tr0 4n. .�' •. -.•w•M •r,.1•Iwa •l\ «.�.• Il.w.
r v air•' ... �� �Q . 'o> �' � /y' ( i
'+. •, I� O•wa\ M..r • T•� .. -.11417 .••w11W , M •...••.41w•
I / ��� \i' +'tT' O�� -•° -. 1 / / v.ny, 4� R&. W..% .f W 1, •IR s�-
I / ylL \ `. ���' taw• V•u.y lN.1a 2.0 A•�•
' r "!- .,,,• ' +y � � \�� • ��, / / I 1 I .. ems... r4t.o
V 1, SGAOO 44. 0% j �'� \ _ "'- la.•1 4 RwIW w ww N1s
Cl
1
�• 3 / � I 5 = .
' �'• �/ as,w• as. n. i� � /= Is�t�~o 4n. = 1tAp0 M.f►. I •
e
:r I
/
� VALLEY LANE PRC►ARee tw.
ROY J. MAN5en
• '. / ♦n•.O WRY CYOI�
I \MOT •.1l•••.O \A.(C R9.
Subdivision 11o.-
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Plannir..9 Con.►issi on
. Par:< Board •
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Deo_ ar:nent
SUBDIV?SIO'ct
•
1.L? 47 G2�0
LA:1D
VALUE: $�
The developer
of th.s subdivision has been required to
❑A.
grant an easement over part of the land
❑ B.
dedicate '' of the land
S as a fee in lieu of land
C.
donate
as a result of aDplvin, the following policy:
(no density or intensity may be used for the first 5 of
A,-
Land RequireA
land - dedicated)
1. If D'^oDerty is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
F1
2. If property
the end result will be a minimum of a 6-acre park.
so that
❑ 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
❑ Ir Drop °rtv is necessay for stogy water holding and will be
4. r.2.3ged or othn„wlse iriproved and rill be a scenic place.
❑ 5. I: ttie property is a place of significant natural, scenic or
historic value.
❑ 5.
B. Cash Required
(; 1. In all other instances than above. .
❑� 2:
S -75 -9 Nagengast Addition. Generally located south of the Crosstown Highway
,e"-�,P - � and north of Doran Drive.
Mr. Luce stated the requested subdivision would include two outlots, three
single family lots, and vacation of a portion of Valley View Road; the street vacation
request is pending before the City Council at the present time. He recommended the
subdivision request be tabled until the Council has reached a decision because if the
street vacation is approved, the north lot line of proposed lot 1 could be moved
further north, thus enlarging that lot, and greater flexibility would be allowed in
locating houses on lots 1 and 3. He added that if the vacation is not approved, a
two lot plat would be more appropriate than the requested three lot plat because
lots 1 and 3, as they are presently proposed, do not meet the minimum lot depth
requirements.
Mr. Jerome Nagengast, the developer, stated the outcome of the street vacation
hearing would not affect the placement of a house on lot 3 because a 25 foot setback
is needed from a gas main located'along the west side of Valley View Road. He
explained how houses designed in conformance with those in the neighborhood could
be placed on each lot without requiring setback variances, whether the north line
of lot l is adjusted or the street vacation is approved. Mr. Nagengast noted the
vacation of part of Valley View Road was requested because the adjacent neighbors
feel landscaping would help buffer them from the Crosstown Highway. He agreed,
however, after further discussion to move the north line of lot 1 approximately
six feet further north to meet the minimum lot depth requirements.
Mr. John P. Carroll, 5616 Doran Drive, stated a title question is pending
concerning proposed Outlot 1 because when he purchased his lot he was informed that
that land was included. He felt the subdivision should be continued until the title
question is decided.
Following further discussion, Mr. C. Johnson moved the preliminary plat be
continued to the next regular Planning Commission meeting, pending City Council
action on the requested vacation of part of Valley View Road and for additional
information on the title conflict mentioned. Mr. G..Johnson seconded the motion.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
7 -2 -75 Planning Commission Minutes, page 3
Mr. Luce noted he would, however, continue to recommend that the north half of the
north side lots be dedicated for maximum control to prevent possible future
development within the floodplain.
Mr. Ray Drake, representing the developer, stated that Rauenhorst Corporation
wants to retain ownership of the entire site because it is easier to sell a larger
lot than a smaller lot. He indicated they do not intend to fill the north half of
the north side lots or in any way infringe upon the city ordinances or watershed.
district regulations.
Discussion followed regarding the possibility and effect of future improve-
ments within the floodplain, the feasibility of attaching a deed restriction to the
deeds for the north side lots to protect the floodplain, whether or not a cash
donation should be required in addition to the prior dedication of parkland along
the creek, and whether or not dedication of the north half of the three lots north
of Dovre Drive extended should be made a condition of the preliminary plat approval.
Mr. Dean moved the proposed six -lot subdivision be approved, "with the present
owner retaining title to the floodplain, subject to a total 5% cash parkland
dedication, with credit being given for that land previously donated in excess of
5% of the total site (Nine Mile North Addition), and also subject to the appropriate
agreement between the developer, city staff and city attorney on deed restrictions
for the three north side lots for floodplain protection purposes." Mr. Dean
clarified that an earlier parkland dedication of at least 5% of the total property
of Nine Mile North Addition would eliminate the need for an additional cash donation.
Mr. G. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
S -75 -9
st Addition. Generally _located north of Doran Drive and south
of the Crosstown Highway. (continued from 5- 28 -75).
Mr. Luce recalled the proposed three lot plat was continued from the last
Planning Commission meeting pending City Council action on the requested vacation
of part of Valley View Road and for additional information in regard to a possible
title conflict concerning Outlot 1. The City Council has subsequently approved the
requested street vacation, providing additional square footage and allowing an
adjustment of the north lot line of lot 1. As a result, all three lots now have
an adequate lot depth and will enjoy greater flexibility in terms of the setback
and other requirements.
Mr. Luce recalled the concern of Mr. John P. Carroll, 5616 Doran Drive,
regarding a possible title question on Outlot 1, but stated that no additional
information has been brought to his attention. Mr. Luce recommended approval of
the requested three -lot subdivision, contingent on a cash. donation equal to 5% of the
raw land value to satisfy the parkland dedication requirement.
A motion to approve the preliminary plat of Nagengast Addition, contingent
on a 5% cash parkland dedication, was made by Mr. G. Johnson and seconded by Mr.
Runyan. All voted aye. Motion carried.
S -75 -13 Iroquois Hills 6th Addition. Generally located north of Braemar
Park, south and west of Valley View Road, and east of County Road 18.
.(continued from 5- 28 -75)
AND
NAGENGAST ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY PLOT APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved as to form and placed on file. Mr. Luce presented
Nagengast Addition for preliminary plat approval contingent on a 5 percent cash
parkland dedication as recommended by the Planning Commission. Councilman Courtney
offered the following resolution granting preliminary plat approval for Nagengast
Addition and moved its adoption:
^- RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL TO
C '
C--- NAGENGAST ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the plat entitled "Nagengast Addition ",
presented by J.J. Nagengast, and presented for Preliminary Plat approval at the Edina
City Council Meeting of July 21, 1975, be and is hereby granted Preliminary Plat
approval, contingent on 5 percent cash parkland dedication.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney; and on
roll call, there were four ayes and no nays, and the resolution was adopted. (See
correction in Minutes of 8/18).
�
nrATION MAC
subdivision
REQUEST NUMBER: 5-76 -5
W of Cahill Road and
LOCATION: S of W. 70th Street
REQUEST: Two lot subdivision
for apartment buildings..
2j11nR�' rlp�»une dcitarttnent villrac �I_ �i]]�
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
April 28, 1976
S -76 -5 Braemar Court. Generally located south of'West 70th
Street and west of Cahill Road.
Refer to: Subdivision Dedication Report
and plat map (attached)
The proponent is requesting to subdivide this 68,222 square foot
parcel into two lots. The north lot would be 34,515 square feet
and would house a nine unit apartment building. The southern
lot would be 26,400 square feet and would house a seven unit
apartment building. The property is presently zoned R -3 Multiple
Residence District. That zoning categorically provides that no
building may contain more than 12 units, thus the necessary
subdivision is being requested.so the developer can achieve his
allowed 16 units. The Southwest Edina Plan indicates that this
is an appropriate use for the site, thus the only obligation for
the developer is for the property to be properly subdivided.
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval 6f this
subdivision for the following reasons:
1.
The
use would conform
with the
zoning
requirements.
2.
It-conforms
with the
Southwest
Edina
Plan.
Approval is recommended with the condition that the appropriate
cash parkland dedication, per the attached subdivision dedication
report, be submitted.
GL:ln
4/23/76
P.S. I have asked the developer to make a short presentation
at the Planning Commission meeting showing the buildings he
proposes to construct on the lots. At the present time the
staff has seen only the floor plans, which is more than
required.
c
gMVN s6 s °�`
{:
m
„6.
x
v
'
U _
- -R�?l�l
AH
-
'"
144. -
I.•
. o
N
C o o.:
R. L. S.
NO. N 1193
•m° T 2
f /\
. :l:•:-
�` •7 +,•
w
_ 150 —tea
a Ho•ns, AMUNDSON AVE.
.•
.. - -
IW {h �' .0
j947L E• .�' �..
to
� m
T
�� '� {'.. '
a .A a,• apt
....
316 5G.'. 130 "W
m; �.
w' „ •'"+
.
NDRTHFIELO
-
✓� 56O /'3p•ly
,•�°'FELL.
"
4j7 8-
__
_ AND
39x.23
SOUTHERN
'98.15, m �T�
N6'IS21 [ '
° '
RAILWAY
o inuuoi` i rail, ea.1, l
'
it
.� $0.41:.:•-
°
.BROOKVIEW
'1
-- ih 19
. �;\/•
2
,((/) - �t •
JACTSON
Subdivision No.
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
1
SUBDIVISION NAME:
LAND SIZE: • LAND VALUE: 4d • 006 66
(B �J ' Date: 4 -23 -7G )
5% dMMW
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
[] A. grant an easement over part of the.land
F1 B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ a% 4 as a fee in lieu of land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be -used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
(] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
[� 2. If property is 6 acres or will be; combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
p3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
[]4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged
or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
[] 5. If the property is a place of. significant natural; scenic or historic
value.
�-0
B. Cash Required
�1. In all other instances than above.
❑ 2.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 1976
EDINA CITY HALL
Members Present: W. W. Lewis, Chairman, S. P. Hughes, C. E. Johnson, G. V. Johnson,
Helen McClelland, Mary McDonald, D. T. Runyan, F. S. Dean.
Staff Present: Greg Luce, City Planner, and Lynnae Nye, Secretary.
I. Approval of the March 31, 1976, Planning Commission Minutes.
A motion to approve the March 31, 1976, Planning Commission minutes as
written and submitted was made by Mr. Hughes and seconded by Mr. C. Johnson. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
II. SUBDIVISIONS:
5 -76 -4 Mark Nelson lst Addition. Generally located at 4536 France Avenue.
Mr. Luce noted that consideration of the proponent's request to rezone the
property in question was continued by the City Council from its April 19th meeting
to May 17th. He then presented a one -lot plat of the Mark Nelson property, required
by the Planning Commission as a condition of the rezoning of that property. Since
no new public services would be required, he recommended the plat be approved
contingent on the requisite 5% cash parkland donation.
After discussion, the Planning Commission generally agreed the parkland
dedication fee should be waived because the land is part of an existing subdivision
and no new demand on park services will be incurred as a result of the proposed
replat.
Mr. Hughes moved the preliminary plat of Mark Nelson First Addition be
approved and the 5% parkland dedication requirement be waived. Mr. G. Johnson
seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
_ S -76 -5 Braemar Court. Generally located west of Cahill Road and south of
° West 70th Street.
Mr. Luce stated the property in question is presently zoned R -3, and
according to the zoning ordinance, 16 units would be allowed on the 68,222 square
foot parcel. Because the zoning ordinance limits the maximum number of units in
one R -3 building to 12 and allows only one building per lot, a two lot subdivision
is requested. A nine unit building would be constructed on the north lot, which
would be 34,515 square feet, and a seven unit building would be constructed on the
south lot, which would be 26,400 square feet.
Mr. Luce presented a site plan of the proposed development for information
purposes, indicating that the project and plat would conform to the present zoning,
the zoning ordinance requirements, and.the Southwest Edina Plan. He recommended
approval of the subdivision contingent on a cash parkland dedication of $2,400.00.
Mr. James Cooperman, the architect, presented an exterior illustration of
the project and briefly explained the total project would be sixteen, 1200 square
foot, two- bedroom units.
Mr. Dean felt the site would be overcrowded and objected to the proposed
density regardless of the present zoning.' lie suggested the plat be denied, thereby
effectively limiting the parcel to 12 units on one lot..
April 30, 1976
City of Edina
4801 West Seth Street
Edina, Minnesota
Attention: Planning Dept.
Gentlemen:
I wish to have the Braemar Court Subdivision
request brought before the Edina City Council on
May 17, 1976.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
RICHARD K. STROM
R. K. Strom Co., Inc.
6912 Paiute Drive
Edina, Minnesota
,,435
7 T T=3
c w
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
President
Clyde Allen
Blooming4on
Vice President
Josephine Nunn
Champlin
Past President
Elliott Perovich
Anoka
Jack Bailey
Minnetonka
Steve Bernard
White Bear Lake
Richard Brennan
Roseville
Frank Brixius
Greenwood
John Christensen
St. Paul,
Jim Cosby
Hastings
Wayne Courtney
Edina
Lyle Hanks
St. Louis Park
Tom Johnson
Minneapolis
Thomas Kelley
St. Paul
Duane Miedtke
St. Anthony
Bruce Nawrocki
Columbia Heights
association of
metropolitan
municopalities
S .1u1, r! :1w!,2s1A, ;tv1 I61'I
N O T I C E O F
APRIL 21, 1976
.ANNUAL * 'MEET'I'NG
MAY 19, 1976
GOLDEN VALLEY HOUSE
4820 OLSON MEMORIAL HIGHWAY
(same as Highway .55 - East
of Highway 100 on Highway 55)
5:15 to 6:15 P.M.
CASH BAR
6:15 to 7:30 P.M.
BUFFET DINNER
(Ham, Roast Beef, Chicken, Au Gratin Potatoes, Potato
Salad, Tossed Salad, Assorted Cheeses, Baked Beans,
Relishes, Rolls, Beverages)
COST OF MEAL: $7.75 PER PERSON
7:30 P.M.
ANNUAL BUSINESS MEETING
A G E N D A
1. Call to order by the President - Clyde Allen, Jr.
2. President's Annual Report.
3. Roll Call.
4. Consideration of By -Laws Amendments (mailed previously)
5. Election of Pres., Vice Pres., and Board Directors
(Nominating Committee Report attached).
6. Challenge for 1976 -1977: President - Elect.
7 Adjourn.
Roger Peterson
Stillwater EACH_ 1,,01BER _MUNICIPALITY SHOULD SEND ONE. - OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVE TO THE MEET-
Donald Poss II\TG TO CAST ITS VOTES. 110II= ARE, ENC0URAGI1), 1101%=, TO SAID AS MANNY AD-
Brooklyn Center DITIONAL, RITRES INWATIVES AS PASSIBLE. DINNIM RESIPVATIONTS MUST BE CON.FIFu1IC-
TO SYLVIA BAUER (222 -2S61) BY NOON ON NlOil)AY, MAY 17n1. ADVANCE DI\T -1111, PA�-
Lyall Schwarz kop 11_IS AIIE SOLICITIJ-)
Minneapolis
Executive Director ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS: PLEASE BRING THIS NOTICE TO
Vern Peterson T111, ATTI INT IO`I 01 - YOUR 1 TA/ 'ORS & COUNC I L!.11; VEILS
<S
CITY OF
May 6,196 PLYMOUTR
Mr. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hyde:
Suburban communities have continued to lose much ground in the legislative
arena, to the considerable detriment of our citizens who comprise 58 percent
of the metropolitan population. There is no way that the far -flung suburbs
can compete with the full -time politicians and huge staffs from the big cities
unless we have an organization which unites us and effectively presents our
positions. For the past few years since the merger of the Suburban and Metro
Leagues, the big cities with a large weighted vote have effectively cut off
the suburban voice and replaced it with their own. We have, in effect, been
supporting an organization which has occasionally taken anti - suburban posi-
tions, or at the minimum, has not promoted suburban interests. The big cities
don't need a league to lobby and achieve their ends because they are staffed
and big enough to do it directly -- and they have been very successful in so
doing! We smaller, under - staffed and part -time council people do need an
organization to represent us. Legislative events over the past few years
demonstrate this dramatically.
May 19th is the annual meeting of the Association of Metropolitan Munici-
palities. The City of Inver Grove Sleights has recommended an amendment to
the by -laws which would provide for a revised weighted voting procedure on
legislative matters. This would help the suburbs and be fair to the big
cities. It is urgent that you or your voting representative be at this
meeting so that the suburbs will have enough votes to effect the by -law
change. Any community which neglects to attend jeopardizes the suburban
hope of ever having a voice to protect our citizens' interests. Our suburban
future is on the line on May 19. Plymouth looks forward to joining with you
in this most important effort. Thank you!
Sincerely yours,
-Al Hilde -, -
Mayor
AH:lg
3025 HARBOR LANE, PLYMOUTH. MINNESOTA 55441. TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
Q,OVE HEIGHTS
THE MAYOR'S OFFICE
cc �,,. Eugene Atkins
W °;� MAYOR
Z
LL
0
W 1
J
J .
> kj', .'
May 10, 1976
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Enclosed for your perusal please find:
U i l --
a) Copy of the proposed amendment of the By -Laws
of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
which has been proposed by the City of Inver Grove
Heights and will be put to the membership on
May 19, 1976; and
b) Copy of a recent letter sent out by Mayor Hilde of
Plymouth, regarding the proposed amendment.
Most of you have already seen Mayor Hilde's letter. However, it
was our. feeling that it so clearly and succinctly stated the
reasons for this proposal that it was deserving of special emphasis.
We respectfully request that you think carefully about the matter
and if you agree with the proposed amendment that you will give
it your support on May 19, 1976.
Thank you.
Very truly yours,
C I T- Y —O -F —I N V -E R— G- R- O- V -E—H-E I G-H T S
Eugene Ak
Mayor
MEA /cvh
enc
6 Ey of 912(T6 'Z 7UCT._ ��tCc]lZE1 l
1;650 COURTHOUSE "DULEVARD
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS: MINNESOTA 55075
1612) 457 -2111
The City Council of Inver Grove Heights authorizes a proposed amendment,
to Article XI, Section 2 of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
By-Laws as follows:
Awarding each municipality an additional vote passed upon 150,000
population figure rather than a 50,000 population so that it would
would read "The vote on any legislative matter shall be by acclamation;
but at any time before the result of the vote is announced., the
chairman may, and shall, if requested to do so by five or more
delegated present, submit the question under consideration to a vote
by municipality in which case each municipality shall be entitled
to one vote plus one additional vote for each 150,000 population
or major fraction thereof of the municipality above the initial
150,000 population according to the most recent population estimate
of the Metropolitan Council except when there is a more recent
official census. Voting by proxy is not permitted, nor may any
delegate cast more than one vote."
May 6, 1976
Mr. Warren C. Hyde,
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Hyde:
RCITYOF
PLYMOUTR
City 11anager
1 �
Suburban communities have continued to lose much ground in the legislative
arena, to the considerable detriment of our citizens who comprise 58 percent
of the metropolitan population. There is no way that the far -flung suburbs
can compete with the full -time politicians and huge staffs from the big cities
unless we have an organization which unites us and effectively presents our
positions. For the past few years since the merger of the Suburban and :Metro
Leagues, the big cities with a large weighted vote have effectively cut off
the suburban voice and replaced it with their own. We have, in effect, been
supporting an organization which has occasionally taken anti - suburban posi-
tions, or at the minimum, has not promoted suburban interests. The big cities
don't need a league to lobby and achieve their ends because they are staffed
and big enough to do it directly -- and they have been very successful in so
doing! We smaller, under - staffed and part -time council people do need an
organization to represent us. Legislative events over the past few years
demonstrate this dramatically.
May 19th is the annual meeting of the Association of Metropolitan Munici-
palities. The City of Inver Grove Heights has recommended'an amendment to
the by -laws which would provide for a revised weighted voting procedure on
legislative matters. This would help the suburbs and be fair to the big
cities. It is urgent that you or your voting representative be at this
meeting so that the suburbs.will have enough votes to effect the by -law
change. Any community which neglects to attend jeopardizes the suburban
hope of ever having a voice to protect our citizens' interests. Our suburban
future is on the line on May 19. Plymouth looks forward to joining with you
in this most important effort.. Thank you!
Sincerely yours,
A1— Hi1de, Jr.
.Mayor
AH:lg
3025 HARBOR LANE, PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
May 6, 1976
i
CITY OF
PLYMOUTH+
Mr. Robert Schaefer, City Administrator
City of Inver Grove Heights
8650 Court House Boulevard
Inver Grove Heights, MN 55075
Dear Mr. Schaefer:
Suburban communities have continued to lose much ground in the legislative
arena, to the considerable detriment of our citizens who comprise 58 percent
of the metropolitan population. There is no way that the far -flung suburbs
can compete with the full -time politicians and huge staffs from the big cities
unless we have an organization which unites us and effectively presents our.
positions. For the past few years since the merger of the Suburban and Metro
Leagues, the big cities with a large weighted vote have effectively cut off
the suburban voice and replaced it with their own. We have, in effect, been
supporting an organization which has occasionally taken anti - suburban posi-
tions, or at the minimum, has not promoted suburban interests. The big cities
don't need a league to lobby and achieve their ends because they are staffed
and big enough to do it directly -- and they have been very successful in so
doing! We smaller, under - staffed and part -time council people do need an
organization to represent us. Legislative events over the past few years
demonstrate this dramatically.
May 19th is the annual meeting of the Association of Metropolitan Munici-
palities. The City of Inver Grove Heights has recommended an amendment to
the by -laws which would provide for a revised weighted voting procedure on
legislative matters. This would help the suburbs and be fair to the big -
cities. It is urgent that you or your voting representative be at this
meeting so that the suburbs will have enough votes to effect the by -law
change. Any community which neglects to attend jeopardizes the suburban
hope of ever having a voice to protect our citizens'_ interests. Our suburban
future is on the line on May 19. Plymouth looks forward to joining with you
in this most important effort. Thank you!
Sincerely yours,
Al Hi.lde. Jr.
Mayor
AH:lg
3025 HARBOR LANE,,PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441, TELEPHONE (612) 559 -2800
I SERVICE 332.7171 Q
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 332.6341
Yf._LOW
wV
MINNEAPOLIS AND SUBURBAN YELLOW CABS- AIRLINE LIMOUSINES
YET,T,owT__AmCO3WANY
0t)11' r11?70a1b0&q
OFFICE 127 1ST AVE. N.E., MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55413
May 6, 1976
Mr. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Hyde:
The City of Minneapolis has approved an increase, which increases
the cab fare by .10C a mile, from .50C to .60C. The former rate
was .10C for each additional one -fifth of a mile and now that rate
will be .lOC for each additional one -sixth of a mile.
There was also a minor change in the mileage for the first drop,
and it changed from .75C for the first one -tenth to .75C for the
first one - twelfth of a mile. This is necessary because of the
meter gear ratio of one -sixth and one - twelfth.
I would appreciate your putting the rate increase on as soon as
possible for hearing.
JFD:an
P.S. I am enclosing a copy of
t ly yours,
i
t°
k Daly, Jr.
Executive Vice President
w`
comparative cab rates.
Ca`iPAI(ATIVE CAR RATE'S
CITY
7NL'CJAL C11A1'G1:
MILE CHARGE
New York
.65
.60
Chicago
..' >0
.50
Los Angeles
.80
.80
Toronto, Canada
.70
.60
Philadelphia
.90
.70
Detroit
.60
.60
Dade County
.80
.80
Houston
.75
.50
Dallas .
65.
.60
Washington'
.60
.60
Cleveland
.80
.60
Indianapolis
.55
.60
San Francisco
.80
.80
Milwaukee
.85
.70
San Diego
.70
.50
San Antonio
.65
.50
Boston
.50
.70
Memphis
.55.
.50
St. Louis
.85
.50
Phoenix
.60
.60
Columbus
.60
.60
Sealt.le
.80
.60
Jacksonville
.60
.60
Pittsburge
.85
.60
Denver.
.70
.60
K.3nt :ice City
.05
Atlanta
.60
.60
Buffalo
.75
.70
Fairfax County
.60
.60
Cincinnati
.65
.60
Nashville
.80
.80
San Jose
.70
.70
Fort Worih
.75
.60
Portland
1.00
.60
Oak land
.60
.80
Loi�f, Beach
.90
. 80 .
Miami
.80
.80
Tula
.65
.60
St. Paul
.85
.70
May 18, 1976
Nis. Sharon A. Meyer
Community Programs Director
American Red Cross
11 Dell Place
Minneapolis, MN 55403
Dear Ms. Meyer:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
May 17, 1976, in support of the.Red Cross Volunteer Transportation
Service.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RED CROSS
VOLUNTEER TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
WHEREAS, the Red.Cross is an organization concerned with the promotion and
improvement of individual and community health and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Red Cross has proposed a Volunteer Transportation Service to be
operated in the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS,.the proposed Volunteer Transportation Service will make it possible
for ambulatory persons to use medical, non - medical, and social programs and
services within the community; and
WHEREAS, the Red Cross has applied for a grant to provide funding to acquire
the vehicles to be used for the Volunteer Transportation Service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council and the City of Edina
support the proposed Red Cross.Volunteer Transportation Service and urge
favorable consideration of the grant application to provide funding for the
implementation of this service.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City.Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of.May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of May, 1976.
City Clerk
Cityllbbf dina
4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 83424
92%.8861
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RED CROSS
VOLUNTEER TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
WHEREAS, the Red Cross is an organization concerned with the promotion and
improvement of individual and community health and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the Red Cross has proposed a Volunteer Transportation Service to be
operated in the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Volunteer Transportation Service will make it possible
for ambulatory persons to use medical, non - medical, and social programs and
services within the community; and
WHEREAS, the Red Cross has applied for a grant to provide funding to acquire
the vehicles to be used for the Volunteer Transportation Service.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council and the City of Edina
support the proposed Red Cross Volunteer Transportation Service and urge
favorable consideration of the grant application to provide funding for the
implementation of this service.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of May, 1976.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 5525
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING RED CROSS
VOLUNTEER TRANSPORTATION SERVICE
WHEREAS, the Red Cross is an organization concerned with the promotion
and improvement of individual and community health and welfare, and
- WHEREAS, the Red Cross has proposed a Volunteer Transportation Service
to be operated in the City of Richfield, and
WHEREAS, the proposed Volunteer Transportation Service will make it
possible for-ambulatory persons to use medical, non - medical, and social
programs and services within the community, and
WHEREAS, the Red Cross has applied for a grant to provide funding to
acquire the vehicles to,be used for the Volunteer Transportation Service.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council and the City
of Richfield support the proposed Red Cross Volunteer. Transportation Service- -
and urge favorable consideration of the grant application to provide funding for
the implementation of this service.
Done in the City of Richfield,. Minnesota, on this 26th day -of- -April,- 1976.--
ATTEST :. ,
Thomas J. Moran, City Clerk
Loren L. Law, Mayor
r
r
MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER
/x
Arnerican R cross ELEVEN DFLL PLACE 0 MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403'
TELEPHONE (612) 871 -7676
April 21, 1976
I ✓s. E. E. Jacobsen
Contract Sales Division
General Electric Company
7450 P:-tro Boulevard
Edina, I *linnesota 55435
Dear Gene:
The Red Cross is presently see }:ing funding from bsTC and
the State Planning Agency for a Transportation Coordination Project
which would develop a coordinated approach toward the provision of
special need Se2_1v1ce bV Volunteer not -=or- profit transportation
programs in Hennepin and Pnoka Counties. A major emphasis of the
program will be on builC3ing a secondary transportation system in
suburban corimmunities vhich would enhance coordination by permitting
the Red Cross to suoplem -2nt local volunteer providers, such as
Richfield's Volunteer Emergency Assistance Program.
Plans call for two ra3i c- disaatched vehicles operating
from an office in the south suburban area. These vehicles would
provide transportation service on a priority basis to a:rjaulatory
persons without the resource to use public or paid transportation:
2ki-Lbulatory persons are de' =ined for purposes of our program as
persons who are able to move themnselves in and out of a vehicle
without assistance. Priorities for service would be medical needs,
non - medical needs, and social.
The Red Cross Transportation Program would also seek
through an Advisory Council made up of all other volunteer trans -
portation providers in the area to provide for the coordination
of all specialized transportation services.
Discussions have been initiated with transportation-pro -
viding agencies in the south suburban area to gain their support
for a coordinated approach to providing service.
Partner with the United Way
Mr. Jacobsen
•Page -2-
We are seeking funds for similar programs in the north-
west suburban area. and Ano }:a County. A Red Cross transportation
program is already operating in the western suburbs. We hope
through suburban progra,-r.s in the northwest and west Hennepin
suburbs and in Anoka County to be able to lend some coordination
to the over two hundred agencies involved in volunteer transpor-
tation service.
As I know you are well aware, funding for this type of
programming requires strong community support. For this reason
we would very'much appreciate the endorsement of the Richfield
City Council and a statement to that effect for inclusion in our
grant proposal.
I would be happy to provide whatever additional infor-
mation you feel to be necessary.
'i'haT11: you for your continuing, active support for the
Red Cross in its efforts to better serve the Richfield area.
SAM:bw
Sincerely,
f
Snaron A. Meyer
Community Programs Director
�i
��
a
From the desk of'.
E. E. (Gene) Jacobsen
W/ "440%00/ MAY 41976
MINNEAPOLIS AREA CHAPTER
American fled -Cross
IQ's. E. E. Jacobsen
Contract Sales Division
General Electric Company
7450 Metro Boulevard
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Gene:
7x_ - 4,
ELEVEN DELL PLACE Y MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55403
TELEPHONE (612) 871 -7676
April 21, 1976
The Red Cross is presently seeking funding from MTC and
the State Planning Agency for a Transportation Coordination Project
which would develop a coordinated approach toward the provision. of
special need service by volunteer not-for-profit transportation
programs in Hennepin and Anoka Counties. A major emphasis of the
program will be on building a secondary- transportation system in,
suburban communities �,,, ich would enhance coordination by permitting
the Red Cross to supplement local volunteer providers, such as
Richfield's Volunteer Emergency Assistance Program.
Plans call for two radio- aispatched vehicles operating
from an office in the south suburban area. These vehicles would
provide transportation service on a priority basis to anJbulatory
persons without the resource to use public or paid tra?.sportationo
Ambulatory persons are de-fined for purposes of our program as
persons who are able to move themselves in and out of a vehicle
without assistance. Priorities for service would be medical needs,
non - medical needs, and social.
The Red Cross Transportation Program would also seek
through an Advisory Council made up of all -other volunteer trans-
portation providers in the area to provide-for the coordination
of all specialized transportation services.
Discussions have been initiated.with transportation-pro-
viding agencies in the south suburban area to gain their support
for a coordinated approach to providing service.
Partner with the United Way W. —
I•'r. Jacobsen
-Page -2-
we are seeking funds for - similar programs in the north-
west suburban area and Anoka County. A Red Cross transportation
program is already operating in the western suburbs. We hope
through suburban programs in the northwest and west Hennepin
suburbs and in Anoka County to be able to lend some coordination
to the over two hundred agencies involved in volunteer transpor-
tation service.
As I know you are well aware, funding for this type of
programming requires strong community support. For this reason
we would very much appreciate the endorsement of the Richfield
City Council and a statement to that effect for inclusion in our
grant proposal.
I would be happy to provide whatever additional infor-
mation you feel to be necessary.
Thank you for your continuing, active support for the
Red Cross in its efforts to better serve the Richfield area.
Sincerely,
S ron A. Meyer
Community.Programs Director
SAM:bw
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss
CITY OF RICHFIELD )
I, Thomas J. Moran, being the duly qualified and - acting
clerk of the City of Richfield, Hennepin - County, Minnesota,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and exact
copy of Resolution No.5525 , duly passed by the city Council
01. said city on April 26, 1976 ;
and that the same is on file and of record in my office.
Given under my'hand and se4l
this 28th day of April, 1976
Thomas .J. Moran
City Clerk
City of Richfield
Hennepin County, Minnesota
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's 5th Addition; and
Lot 11, Block 1, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said
tracts of land so that Outlot A, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition is added
to Lot 11, Viking Hills 4th Addition; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zon-
ing Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and
said Parcels as combined in the above manner do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance =:Nos. 811 and 801;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcel.- as combined in the above
manner is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
Nos. 811 and Ordinance 801 are hereby waived to allow said combination and con-
veyance thereof as a,'-separate tract of land but are not waived for any other
purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the
provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcel unless made in
compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 17, 1976, and as
recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand nand seal of said City this 1st day of June, 1976.
City Clerk
� (l9
No. 1517%
MILLET( -DA V IS Co.
Minneapolis
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WH1TF - Grflce Copy
YELLOW—Buyer's Copy
GREEN — Seller's Copy t
PINK — Buyer'° Receipt k
........ Edina ..... ...........................Mint .......April.. .................... 1976...
RECEIVED OF ..... CITY.. QF ..EDINA....a..munic.ipal ... corp oration ...................................... ...............................
the sum of. .... Ten..Thousand.. and., No/ 1Q0,.------------.----------- .- ..(a.1Q.0.0.0..00....) DOLLARS
........ CheCk ................................ .............................as earnest money and in part payment for the purchase of property at
(Cheek, Caah or Note — State W filch)
6.6117..SA.uth..Kracaull:7.1 ail.....E dins ................................ ............................... .......................situated in the
County of ........... Hennepin---------------- -- ---- ---- ---------- ---------- State of Minnesota, and legally described as follows, to -wit:
Outlot B, Indian Hills— Arrowhead Addition, according to
the recorded plat thereof,
including all garden bulbs, plants, shrubs and trees, all storm sash, storm doors, detachable vestibules, screens, awnings, window
shades, blinds (including venetian blinds), curtain rods, traverse rods, drapery rods, lighting fixtures and bulbs, plumbing
fixtures, hot water tanks and heating plant (with'any burners, tanks, stokers and other equipment used in connection there-
with), water softener and liquid gas tank and controls (if the property of seller), sump pump, television antenna, inciner-
ator, built -in dishwasher, garbage disposal, ovens, cook top stoves and central air conditioning equipment, if any, used and
located on said premises and including also the following personal property:
all of which property the undersigned has this day sold to the buyer for the sum of:
One.. Hundred. . Sixty.. Thousand.. and..No /100. (v160,0.00.00.) DOLLARS,
which the buyer agrees to pay in the following manner:
Earnest money herein paid $1.0.,.000...00.... and 5150,000..00.., cash, on .May..12,..1976 ............... the date of dosing.
The terms and conditions contained in the Addendum attached
hereto are hereby made a part hereof as. though fully set
forth herein.
Subject to performance by the buyer the seller agrees to execute and deliver a ............................................. ............................... Warranty Deed
(to be joined in by spouse, if any) conveying marketable title to said premises subject only to the following exceptions:
(a) Building and zoning laws, ordinances, State and Federal regulations.
(b) Restrictions relating to use or improvement of premises without effective forfeiture provision.
(e) Reservation of any minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota.
(d) Utility and drainage easements which do not interfere with present improvements.
(e) Rights of tenants as follows: (unless specified, not subject to tenancies)
l�fllthEFt{ iP6er :dFAOFdh@�Ga::ari -0gCC4A1alC dairy �. iepdCiClYaL1�4 ,�LatlrLallL]13haLSnPYP1 � ^ ^the —� rse'tl�uaretaxes
Vila" ibafll'IC3-- ed'OLtha p Qperty311b,eglJ ,r= Jhc_dJM11LRurL4=.
T• i1N- SBIif�% UFr�rar�?�ieai- rG�CILYCLpnSLCSrILIn�nOLL' t[ ELrhaL.--- -------------- �I1fGY1dCd11L1L.all �nnrl i�inni(]LtLY
agreaw+encJtava beer�rompled m+eli- Unlrss_urheruttse Sprr,hc,l1J3Jjs_,,1, h,lL w dsed-.. acbef =.6adayslmml!><datrJ3erenf_
In the event this property is destroyed or substantially damaged by fire or any other cause before the closing date, this agreement shall
become null and void, ac the purchaser's option, and all monies paid hereunder shall be refunded to Min. it.
'Fhc- beyee- end• serleFelso. muwally- agreeslant.4i a Laad;_ran tsnLrents�ntetest...ins�,��n�e and_ciq, y"ter.aad, ash`cue-4E
inEerrtti 9repeFgyarrrenc�pacuiaax- peoses.$)mllbcMade a of _ ....................................................... ..........................._...
The seller shall, within a reasonable time after approval of this agreement, furnish an abstract of title, or a Registered Property
Abstract cq ified to date to include proper searches covering bankruptcies, and State and Federal judgments and liens. The buyer shall be
allowed- 16gays after receipt thereof for examination of said title and the making of any objections thereto, said objections to be made in
writing or deemed to be waived. If any objections are so made the seller shall be allowed 120 days to make such title marketable. Pending
correction of title the payments hereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title and within 10 days after written notice
to the buyer, the parties shall perform this agreement according to its terms.
If said title is not marketable and is not made so within 120 days from the date of written objections-thereto as above provided, this
agreement shall be null and void, at option of the buyer, and neither principal shall be liable for damages hereunder to the other principal.
All money theretofore paid by the buyer shall be refunded. If the tide to said property be found marketable or be so made within said time,
and said buyer shall default in any of the agreements and continue in default for a period of 10 days, then and in that case the seller may
terminate this contract and on such termination all the payments made upon this contract shall be retained by said seller and said agent, as
their respective interests may appear, as liquidated damages, time being of the essence hereof. This provision shall not deprive either parry of
the right of enforcing the specific performance of this contract provided such contract shall not be terminated as aforesaid, and provided action
to enforce such specific performance shall be commenced within six months after such right of action shall arise.
tcls.. Hate rstot> aLwtLar rcr llh. aihiss3le Js- tnadcsuhiecrtn ._tbcaertvs;il�sshc ow�er_gt sisidsrsmirxtiaf <•ritiar�andthaubcuadem
eigttaL -0goac.ie ara .ae.raaaneLliabla.ncJCSpoosible naaccottnr_uflhis �ut:eruenL rsteei ta. trnun. tltaLmunr .tarlheearnestmuneY�3aid_ttndec
vf.irceets,tt�.
The delivery of all papers and monies shall be made at the office of: .............................................................. •••• ....' -° .•'•""'
...Uty...9f ..E dUA ........................... ............................... ......................................................... ...............................
4801 West 50th Street
1, the undersigned, owner of the above land, do hereby approve
the above agreement and the sale thereby made. I hereby agree to purchase the said property for the price and
upon the terms above mentioned, and subject to all conditions
herein expressed.
e
....... ............................... .._......................(SEAL) CITY OF EDINA
John N. Ht1m Seller .....Borer .......... .........................(SEAL)
By
..(SEAL) ......................t�.B Dsyor (SEAL)
.................Hu. ............ e,II''r' ............................... .................................... ...............................
F1oTence E. Hulue Seller Buyer
And — _a.It8__C tty 11,II1ai!cr
. w
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED APRIL -, 1976 FOR PROPERTY AT 6617 McCAULEY TRAIL,
EDINA, MINNESOTA
1. On or' before the date of closing the Sellers will pay in full
all real estate taxes payable with respect to the subject premises in 1976
and prior years, and all special assessments which are a lien against the
subject premises as of the date of closing.
2. Sellers and Buyer acknowledge and agree that the current fair
market value of the subject premises is at least Two Hundred Twenty —four
Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($224,000.00), as evidenced by the appraisal
thereof made by Wiley Real Estate Appraisals & Consulting Service, dated
November 11, 1975. Buyer hereby acknowledges receipt of a gift from Sellers
in the amount of at least Sixty —four Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($64,000.00),
being the difference between the total purchase price to be paid by Buyer for
the premises and the actual fair market value thereof.
3. Buyer agrees that Sellers may remain on the subject premises and
serve as caretakers thereof for the Buyer for a period not in excess of three
(3) years subsequent to the date of closing. During such period of possession
subsequent to the date of closing, Sellers agree:
I
(a) To pay for all utilities used on the premises,
(b) To maintain the premises in as good a condition
as exists on the date of closing, reasonable
wear and tear excepted,
(c) To hold the Buyer harmless from any claims for
damage to property or injury to persons occurring
on or about the premises,
(d) To keep the premises unceasingly insured against
fire and extended coverage risks for the benefit of
Buyer for its full insurable value, and
(e) To give prompt notice to Buyer of any damage or
! vandalism occurring on the premises.
Sellers shall give Buyer at least 30 days prior written notice of the date on
! which Sellers will vacate the premises. Sellers shall remove all of their per -
sonal property from the premises on or before the date on which they vacate
the premises. Any property not so removed shall become the property of the
Buyer and may be used or disposed of in whatever manner it desires.
It is understood and agreed that in remaining on the subject premises
subsequent to the date of closing, Sellers shall be acting solely as agents of
{ the Buyer, and Buyer shall have free right of access thereto and the right to
make.any improvements thereto which it may desire.
j 4. Buyer agrees that, within a reasonable period of time subsequent
to the date of closing, it will at its sole cost and expense seal coat the
{ existing driveway located on the subject premises and fertilize the front lawn
{ portion thereof.
5. Buyer covenants and agrees that for so long as it shall be the owner
bf the subject premises, it shall be known and designated as "Hume Park ".
R CITY OF EDINA
By
i Its Mayor
t
I
I
And
Its City Manager
-4 . `~
`
\ '
/
--------------'
John N. Hume
Florence E. Hume
SUN CITY HOME ONVNERs- .1 K.t,�Ti(1`'
/
10401 COGGINS DRIVE • SUN CITY, ARIZONA 8SJS1 •
Nl)At 1, 4 4, 1s
- Officers -
MAY WHYTE HUBER. PRESIDENT
R. HUBERT OSBORNE. FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
L. Q. YOWELL. SECOND VICE PRESIDENT
y �
May .5, 1976
Florence B. Hallberg, City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West Fiftieth Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear City Clerk Hallberg:
- O!!adwl -
CTAws S.AQ"VS•OM. T•lA04016111
We are delighted to have your acceptance on the
Registration and Voting Campaign. when you re-
ceive the registered voters data the "middle of
May, we would be pleased to have it; also, your
Population figures. We do feel that our Campaign
is working well as the clippings will show.
Any additional information you can send us that
Will help the campaign, we will appreciate.
Very truly yours,
May Wh�e Huber, President
Sun City Home Owners Association
MWH:eh
Encl.
- Directors -
EARL L. CLORE ELLIS DANNER J. ALLYN FITSCHEN
LILY EDWARDS G. DOUGLAS MORRIS KATHLEEN KEISER
EDWARD T. JOHNSON JOHN SHAW R. HUBERT OSBORNE
PAUL DEBENHAM CYRUS MAGNUSSON
MAY WHYTE HUBER ROBERT E. PITT
L. Q. YOWELL THOMAS H. SKIRM
0.
SUN CITY CITIZEN —May S, 1976 -7
Challen e
A Issues Voting
appears in full below.
In making; its appeal to
Sun City voters, the board
noted a Sun City chal-
lenge on voter registra-
tion accepted by the cities
of I:dina. Minnesota, and
Park Rl(lge. Illinois. A
Challenge has also been
accepted by the 110A, on
behalf of the residents of
tiun City. from Alameda,
California, to become the
..yotillge%t city by
November ?. 1976.••
The board of directors
of the Sun City Home
Owners Association has
issued a challenge —a
voting challenge to the
residents of Sun City.
Mildred B. Britton
Mildred S. Bucks
Blaine Simons
Helen Ellison
Mary A. Hanson
Ronald C. Hutson
Marabell L. Krauth
Robert E. Krauth
Alberta M. Long
Harry F. Martin
Frank J. Sorg
Genevieve M. Ingham
Leroy W. Ingham
Allegra J. Saunders
William R. Hoffman
Emilia Kunic
Michal Kunic
Esther Comstock
Robert F. Richardson
Vernon T. Finley
Blanche M. Milligan
A,►.n� that all Sun
Citi.j.I. ,aspect and verify
their Wting credentials,
the 11u:% board seeks the
hie hi %t possible turnout
at tltc Ix +ils on September
Voter Registrar
Robert F. NWI-can
Curtis R. %uW,
Ruby L. Sit —K \ irr
Alice Tillu•th
Carl A. Andrmon
Leroy V. G.airn•
Lydia T. Ilcimann
Hans It. hra++r
Patricia A. I--n
Earl W. \1anu.r,
Frances
Margucritr " ila%k
Virgil II. Ha.►
Evch n NI. 1., -•bwn
Homer L. Nla.'
Myrtle S. yl hindcl
Katherine S. �
Elbert L. i'r,larccr; Sr.
Edwin fount
Lester P. I YiLd"hai,en
7 and November
To help ;,.:rtttial
voters, the Ila.% 1,,jrd
has compiled a h,! ,,I the
registrars in the S_•tt ( ity-
Youngtown at It
Walter J. Richeson
Pauline W. Box
Merle R. Thompson
Howard L. Kilts
Ada El Atkinson
Hawley Atkinson
Marian R. Auren
George H. Hagle
Wolcott L. Steele
Marg Steele
Eleanor Mitchell
Eugene W. Smith
Zila D. Smith
Arnold M. Lehlbach
Flora C. Seedorf
Owens S. Williams
Mary Wilson
Grace T. Allen
John B. Bennett
Edwin 0. Berg
Kenneth R. It—iAdl
Pauline LiillA,
Joseph It.
Emma NI. k,O .0
Verona )t. G-4-
Emil Jahn
Fern mint, +n
Thoma+ N1. K.*%rUlC
Delia I..
John L. Arr' < "•t
AuguNinr I
Maude I.. 00-
Carl R.
Clinton II. ! •.+inrr
Muriel I. N• r,
Janett NJ. b; bw
June Rhoaa.
Man Ilrnai.••tw1
Ra\ n\ond t
Harriette •e u..►�r
WeITOA
SICK??
?NOY rygliaef f 1( CO.1
lit#$ N /VAOA qw. II
vewAlarel �11i /!//