HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-08-16_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
AUGUST 16, 1976
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of August 2, 1976, approved as submitted or corrected by motion seconded by
RESOLUTIONS OF CONDOLENCE - Mrs. Paul Foss and Mrs. Howard Nichols
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS - Edina General Sports Men's Industrial Softball Team
I.
II.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Presentation by City Manager and
Engineer. Spectators heard.. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolu-
tion Ordering Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Storm Sewer Improvement No. P -ST.S -151 - Easement line - Lot 1, Block 3,
The Heights 5th Addition (Continued from 7/19/76)
B. Street Improvement No. P -BA -220 - W. 69th Street from France Ave. to Xerxes:
Ave. (Continued from 7/19/76)
C. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -19 - South side Wl 69th Street from France Ave.
to Xerxes Ave. (Continued from 7/19/76)
D. Traffic Signal Improvement No. P -TS -1 - W. 69th Street at York Ave. (Con -
tinued from 7/19/76)
E. Sanitary-Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -333 - Marth Road from W. 78th Street North
F. . Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -305 - Marth -Road from W. 78th St. North
G. Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -306 - T.H. 100 last Frontage Road - W. 66th
Street to Payton Court
H. Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -307 - T.H. 100 West Frontage Road - W. 66th
Street and Josephine Ave. South 875' + .
I. Curb & Gutter Improvement No. P -B -87 - T.H. 100 East and West Frontage.Roads -
property side, East from Hibiscus Ave. to W. 66th St. and West from W. 70th
St. to W. 66th St.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING MATTER Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators
heard. First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable roll-
call vote to pass Second Reading.
A. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 811 -A79 --Grimes House - Part of Lot 15, Melvin Grimes
Subdivision of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Grimes Homestead (4200 W. 44th St.) °•�,�
R -1 Single Family Residential District to R -1 Heritage Preservation
District - Z -76 -10 (7/7/76) 1
III. :PUBLIC.HEARINGS ON PRELIMINARY PLAT'APPROVALS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to
proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Wright's Addition - Generally located East of Valley View Road at the end of
Moccasin Valley Road - S -76 -13 (7/28/76)
B. Braemar Homestead Addition - Generally located East and South of Valley
View Road and North and West of Mark Terrace Drive - S -76 -18 (7/28/76)
C. Robert Middlemist 2nd Addition - Generally located West of Olinger Road,
South of Vernon Avenue and East of Blake RidgeiTownhouses - S -76 -16
(7/28/76)
D. Hyde Park 2nd Addition - Generally located South of Dewey Hill Road and
East of Gleason Road'- 7/76 -19 (7/28/76) 1
E. Krahl's Mountain - Generally located South of Vernon Ave. and West of
Arctic Way - S -76 -12 (Continued from July 19, 1976) (Continue to 9/20/76)
IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION Presentation by Planning Department.
Spectators heard. Action of Council by Resolution.] 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
to pass. f
A. Fountainwoods Apartments - Outlot C, Walnut Ridge 3rd Addition - 6700 Vernon
Ave. - Permission to maintain a single family dwelling unit structure in•the
R -4 Multiple Residence District (Continued from 7/29/76) (Continue to 9/13/76)
V. PUBLIC HEARING ON LOT DIVISION Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by
Planning Department. Spectators heard. Action of Council by Resolution. 3/5
favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Redevision of Lots 8, 9 and 10. Block 1, Minikanda Vista 3rd Addition
East side of Kipling Ave. between W. 40tb'and W 41st Streets
VI. COMPIUNICATIONS
A. Morningside Community Association - Request for Public Hearing on curb,
gutter and streets
i
Agenda
August 16, 1976
Page Two
Vii.,;.. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
1. Final Plat Approval
a. Dreis Addition - S.W. Corner of View Lane and Vernon Ave'. - S -76 -7
b. McCauley Heights - South of McCauley l.ane,`East of McCauley Trail,
.North of Margaret's Lane
B. Notice of Objection 'and Appeal on 1975 -HRA -1 Assessment - Red Barn
C. Appointment of Election Judges for Primary Election
D. Benton Ave. - T.H. 100 Study Report
E. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes.-,August 10, 1976
F. Fe 375fF ty Report - Set Hearing Date
G. Regional Seminars — Public Works Employment Act of 1976
H., Budget Meetings
I. Special Council Meeting - August 23, 1976 - 7:00 p.m..- Community Health
Service Act
J. Blossom Court Water Project
K. Tree Purchase - Informal Bids
.L. Purchase of Lumber - Replacement Boards for Hockey Rinks
M. Increase in Tree Removal Subsidy - Dutch Elm Disease
N. H.R.A. Redevelopment Area Bus Shelters
0. 911 Costs Update
P. Post Agenda - -and Miscellaneous Items
VIII. ORDINANCES First Reading requires offering.of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass-Second Reading or if First Reading should be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 1232 - Municipal Parking Ramp (Continued from 8/2/87).
B. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 451 -A4 - Political Signs
IX. RESOLUTIONS
A. Cooperative Construction. and Turnback Agreement No. 58308 - T.H. 100
woo B. Approval of Plans - T.H. 100 from W. 74th St. to 500' South.of Crosstown
Highway - SP 2733 -61 (110 =130)
X. ANY OTHERS -WHO DESIRE HEARING.BEFORE,COUNCIL
XI. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund as of 6/30/76
B. .Claims Paid: Motion of seconded by for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List: General Fund, $110,221.57;
Poor Fund, $12,434.00; Park, $2,119.25; Swimming Pool, $3,612.39; Golf
Course, $14,870.58;. Arena; $5,502.01; Gun Range, $165.04; Water`Works,
$20,224.62; Sewer, $67,5,76.58;Liquor. Fund, $195,539.86; Construction Fund,
$56,006.98; Total, $488,272.88
d.k �
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina supports completely the planning of the 911 univ-
ersal emergency telephone number.; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has been represented by various staff personnel on
committees and sub - committees of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Chem mjt_tee5; and
WHEREAS, it is apparent that this very desirable system will cost munici-
palities additional sums which are not excluded from levy limits; and
WHEREAS, this system is an integral part of the telephone communications and
is available only telephone users;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the recommenda-
tions of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council Communications Steering
Committee that "The annual operating expenses associated with the provision f
911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin County should be supp through
the initiation of a telephone user tax to be collected by the phone companies. ";
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council, the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities, the.League of Minnesota Cities, the Public Service
nece Commission taonmakeritwposs Bell-Telephone
urged
all
ateps
nece sary
,--'-telephone user tax.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
V ,
0,51� f %V
µmw.. g„eT,...�
FxiL
t
O
M E M O R A N D U M
13 August 1976
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Warren C. Hyde
City Manager
SUBJECT: 911 - Guesstimated Costs Update
.Prior to your approving Edina's participation in the Hennepin
Emergency Communications Organization (HEC) joint powers agreement you
asked for information on costs. On May 12, John O'Sullivan, Director,
County Criminal Justice Council, advised that in 1978, the consultant esti-
mated-an additional cost over present costs of $15,700 yearly for selectively
routed 911 services to'`.Edina for Edina residents. A copy of this memo
is attached..
At a Communications Steering Committee meeting August 12, the
consultant furnished new data, a copy of which is attached. The costs to
the individual communities are calculated, we. think, on the assumption that
the County will assume the costs estimated for one central location (which is
not now being planned) and that those agencies which will actually have
their. own PSAP (Public Safety Answering Point) will pay the additional
costs, necessary to have .a decentralized system. On this basis Edina's cost
is estimated at $568 per month (appr. $7,000 yearly) for a system which has
the ANI (Automatic Number Identification) feature now recommended and at
$912 per month $10,000 yearly) for a system which also includes ALI
(Automatic Location Identification). This latter feature is still under
consideration. Stated simply, ANI automatically displays visually the
calling telephone number. ALI displays in addition to the calling number,
the address of the phone from which the call originated.
At the urging of Don Poss, City Manager, Brooklyn Center, who
is the spokesman for the city managers as a member of the Steering Committee.,, .
and vigorously prompted by me, the Committee, is beginning to get across the
point that the annual operating expenses must be supported through the
initiation of a telephone user tax to be collected by the phone companies.
Bob Buresh is a member of the Committee. This will not be an easy matter
for which to secure final implementation. The Metropolitan Council staff,
Public Service Commission staff, and the telephone company representatives,
as well as the legislature are all in the act, and many are not completely
sold on it. The municipalities must make a determined fight to get this
type of financing for 911. If this- effort is successful, then I would
assume there would be no additional out -of- pocket cost to the icipality
for a 911 system.
ren C. Hyde
WCH: if CITY MANAGER
cc: Bob Buresh
2 /attacks.
May 12, 1976
Warren Hyde, Edina City Manager. •�''...; f f
John O,sullivan, Director, Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council!
• Response to Request for Cost Estimates i. .
In response to your request for Edina costs projections coz Docu�nent� Prime
provided in Table 2, Page 23 of the Dece
pared
provided
Michaud, Cooley, Hallberg, Erickson and Associates, Inc., specifically
r
Option 4, please consider the following.
In consultation with th e consultant and in using the samhe 0basg�rcityhich
served as the basis for calculating the Table 2 costs, t option
X62,840 and the county _tax cost for Edina
expenditures for Edina r.ould be rte However, the consultant
would be $50,700 for. a total in option
. ,a
ptio35g b in generat
f $11.3, t,
ing that cos
advised against using the cost
projection, a nuinber of assumption had to wasmassumedc .that ythere bwould ube e��
For example, in calculating, this cost, it }.
no telephone user tax, it was assumed that all financing would be the result
of property taxes and further, it �:as assumed ssumed that the county of Hennepin
uld ay costs associated with the establishment of a single-location ent fmultisle ~:
wo P
tem and any difference in cost occasioned by the establishmen �
locations would be assumed by those independent jurisdictions.
Rather than using the figure of $113,548, the consultant indicated a more
realistic cost projection for Edina would be an annual operating expense of
$81,000 consisting of 11078 operating costs for its current public safety
30
dispatching system (estimated to be $65, and an additional $15,700 for
selectively routed 911 services to Edina for Edina residents.
In sunrnary, both Cdr. Vegemast and I would recommend that municipalities con - `
HECO Agreement exercise caution in using . cost pr��ions 11 CS h
sidering_.. ��, _.. --
as tfiese which have been�ased on _so minan� v�.ri abl es and assu,,�pti ons. Un i ot•-
unat�ly, ctua-l_ cost - information cannon be genedrtdtfinanciagucriteria,
Specific con TIguration (number of locations) an specific
have been established for all affected units of government in Hennepin County.
At this time, we do not feel accurate information of that nature will be
available until this corning Septcmber or October.
I hope this response, albeit tentative and preliminary, at least establishes
a reasonable "ball park estimate" for consideration by the Edina City Council.
In the event you need further clarification, please call.
JO: bjr
r
It is recommended that a basic training and familiarization course be
developed for dispatchers and /or operators working within the 911 answer-
ing points since 911 will be used to reach every emergency service avail-
able.
In the event that 91.1 cannot be used to call for service for any reason,
the administrative seven digit telephone lines at the primary answering
points shall be available for emergency telephone calls.
Ill. COST DATA
Included in this section are recurring and initial cost data for the recom-
mended 911 configuration for Hennepin County.
Where possible, costs which can be directly attributed to a PSAP, are shown
allocated to that PSAP.
Costs are also estimated for a single consolidated PSAP for illustration
and to assist with cost sharing negotiations.
Assumptions used to obtain these estimated cost figures are also indicated.
.Recurring Cost
Non- Allocated
Allocated
PSAP
1 Location
13 Locations
Bloomington
Brooklyn Center
Crystal
Edina
Golden Valley
Hopkins
Minneapolis
New (lope
Richfield
Robbir.sdale
St. Louis Park
Sheriff
U of M
Total Allocated Costs
911 w/ 911 w/
AN 1 All I
ONLY & ALI
$13,486/mo. $23,546/mo.
$20,663/mo. $30,723/mo.
911 w/ 911 w/
ANI ANI
ONLY & ALI
669/mo.
1,023 /mo.
586/mo.
930 /mo.
412 /mo.
756 /mo.
568/mo.
912 /mo.
323/mo.
667/mo.
390 /mo.
734/mo.
961 /mo.
1,305 /mo.
403 /mo.
747/mo.
654/mo.
998/mo.
412/mo.
756/mo.
563 /mo.
907 /mo.
612 /mo.
956/mo.
312/mo.
65G /mo.
,92'1 /mo.
$11,399/mo.
I
Capital Cost
Non - Allocated
911 w/ 911 w/
ANI ANI
ONLY ALI
1 Location $522,675 $1,212,305
13 locations $740,600 $1,511,480
Allocated
911
w /ANI
Only
$
1,000
per
location.
911
w /ANI
ALI
$
2,500
per
location.
Assumptions:
1. Cost of generic•8.3 is $35,000 per ESS all of which is charged to 911.
2. Foe a consolidated system, the PSAP will be at the courthouse in down-
'..; •town Minneapolis.
3. All costs for selectively routing border exchanges are charged to
Hennepin County.
4. Assume purchase of computer hardware and straight line depreciation
expense for 10 years instead of a normal telephone company lease charge.
5. EMS and other agencies requesting direct lines will pay for them.
6. No administrative line expenses are included.
7. For purposes of these estimates, it is assumed that a stand alone pro -
prietary'ALI system will be used.
8. Many assumptions regarding cost per name and address entries were made
as cost figures were not available from the telephone company.
V
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina supports completely the planning of the 911
universal emergency telephone number; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has been represented by various staff personnel
on committees and sub - committees of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice
Council; and
WHEREAS, it is apparent that this very desirable system will cost munici-
palities additional sums which are not excluded from levy limits; and
WHEREAS, this system is an integral part of the telephone communications and
is available only through telephone usage; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has joined the Hennepin Emergency Communications
Organization (HECO) to further plan and hopefully to implement the 911
system;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports the recom-
mendations of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council Communications
Steering Committee that "The annual operating expenses associated with the
provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin County should be
supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to be collected
by the phone companies. "; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Metropolitan Council, the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities, the League of Minnesota Cities, the Public
Service Commission, the State Legislature, the Board of County Commis-
sioners of Hennepin County and Northwestern Bell Telephone Company be urged
to take all steps necessary to make it possible for this needed service to
be financed by a telephone user tax.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its meeting of August 16, 1976,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of August, 1976.
City Clerk
August 17, 1976
Your efforts in behalf.of. this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 17, 1976
Association of Metropolitan Municipalities
480 Cedar St.
St. Paul, M14 55401
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 17; 1976
Mr. Stanley R.. Cown , administrator,
Hennepin County
Government Center
300 S. 6th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55487
Dear Mr.'Cowle:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by,the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services- in..Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax-to
be collected by the,telephone companies:
Your efforts in behalf.-of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
J
enclosure
August 17, 1976
League of Minnesota Cities
460 Cedar St.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 17, 1976
Public Service Commission
American Center Building
160 Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55101
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted -by the Edina City'Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that'the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 16, 1976
Board of County Commissioners
Government Center
300 S. 6th St.
Minneapolis, Mid 55487
Gentlemen:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution- adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses addociated `
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone-services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax�to
be.sao$eicted by the telephone companies.
Your effortt in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk !
enclosure
August 17, 1976
Mr. Warren Bosch
Northwestern Bell Telephone Company
200 S. 5th St.
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Dear Mr. Bosch:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated'
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County,be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
August 17, 1976
The Honorable William Dean
Minnesota State Capitol
St. Paul, Ki 55101
My dear Mr. Dean:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual - operating expenses- associated
with the provision of 911 emergency.te'lephone services in Hennepin
County be supported theough`the.-initaation of a telephone user -tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf-of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk.
enclosure
August 16, 1976
The Honorable Harmon T. Ogdahl
Minnesota State Capitol
St. Paul, Mid 55155
My dear Mr. OQdabl
Enclosed ' herewi.th -is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council bn'
August 16; 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
Ci ty Cl elck
enclosure
August 17, 1976
The Honorable Mary Forsythe
Minnesota State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55155
My dear Mrs. Forsythe:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the annual.operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency-telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tak to
be collected by the telephone companies..
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 11,.1976
The'Honorable Ray 0. Pleasant .
Minnesota State Capitol
'St. Paul, MN 55155
Ply dear. Mr. Pleasant:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution. adopted by the Edina City Council on
August 16, 1976, urging that the _ annual operatinq expenses associated
with the-provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax i:o
be collected by the telephone.componies.
Your efforts -in behalf of this resolution'w.ill be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 17, 1976
The Honorable Otto Bang
Minnesota State Capitol
St. Paul, KI 55155
My dear Senator Bang:
Enclosed herewith is a resolution adopted by the Edina City Council on-
August 616, 1976, urging that the annual operating expenses associated
with the provision of 911 emergency telephone services in Hennepin
County be-supported through the initiation of a telephone user tax to
be collected by the telephone companies.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
August 25, 1976
Mr. John O'Sullivan
Hennepin County Criminal Justice
312 4th Ave. S.
Minneapolis, MCI 55402
Dear Mr. O'Sullivan:
Enclosed as you requested is a- certified copy of Edina's resolution sup-
porting the planning of the 911 universal emergency telephone number.
Yours very truly,,
City Clerk
enclosure
RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS
WHEREAS, during the 1976 Edina Men's Slo -Pitch Softball Season, seventeen
employees of Edina'Independent School District #273 Men's Industrial Soft-
ball Team, sponsored by General Sports, under the able direction of Player -
Coach Dave Wood, has continued to exemplify the highest goals of good
sportsmanship and outstanding proficiency; and
WHEREAS, the team efforts have been rewarded by going all season undefeated,
finishing first in the Thursday Industrial League, first in the Edina
Industrial Playoffs, and by being the first Edina Men's.Softball Team to
win the Industrial State Tournament; and
WHEREAS, during this past softball season, these gentlemen have represented
Edina in the highest manner;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council that the out-
standing accomplishments of the Edina General Sports Softball Team deserve
the sincere gratitude of the citizenry of Edina for the exemplary manner
in which the team has conducted itself and for the great credit the team
has brought to the community; and
BE.IT FURTHER RESOLVED that appropriate copies of this resolution be pre-
sented to Steve Kagol, Steve Erdal, Bart Larson, Bob Haddorff, Bud Bjerkken,
Jim Luther, Jim Berger, Howard Busse, Ron Larsen, Jim Gornich, Ron Behning,
Dale Vagts, Ted Kobs, John Thorkelson, Roger Peterson, Jim Norman and to
Player -Coach Dave Wood.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
Mayor
RESOLUTION
.. - ..
-'R -� .
i
Mayor and Council, Village of Edina
September 4, 1969
Page 2
taoroug4 consideration. Generally, as I have pointed out before, we have a
minimum staff, end we have in manly ways geared Lo hitting the high spots, and
extinguishing the "brush fires1° as they occur. Our paper nark and record
keeping has been on the minimal side. As the Village nears ultimate development
in the next 10 years or so, and as the complexity of urban living constantly
increases, it becomes more important that study be given as to whether our
present organization is adequately structured, and staffed. Although increased.
total Village personnel has not increased significantly, more and more time
must be devoted to personnel problems .. recruitment, training, discipline,
negotiation., etc. An excellent case could be made to justify including in the+
Budget $10,000 to $12,000 for a new position o- Personnel, Budgeting and
Purchasing officer. Currently, the Administrative Assistant is assigned the
preliminary personnel dutfes of advertising for and interviewing applicants.
We desperately need to develop personnel procedure manuals and indoctrinate new
employees move thoroughly. While we do a reasonably good job of preparing a
Budget, we are very weak on routine, periodical budget control once'it is
adopted. Although our purchasing is centrally controlled, most buying is
actually done by the using depaartmemt. We may have become too large to continue to operate as simply as we have in the past.
Your consideration of the Proposed Budget is eagerly anticipated. A final
Budget must be adopted not later than October 1 and certified to the County
7
I
i
C
WHEREAS, during the 1976 Edina Men's Slo -Pitch Softball season, the Edina General
Sports Men's .Industrial Softball Team, under the abIc direction of Player -Coach
Dave Wood, has continued to exemplify the highest goals of good sportsmanship and ou-Km
standing proficiency; and `
WHEREAS, the team efforts have been rewarded by going all season undefeated finishing
first in the Thursday Industrial League, first in the Edina Industrial Playoffs, and
by being the first Edina Den's Softball Team to win the Industrial State Tournament; and .
WHEREAS, During this past softball season, these gentlemen have represented Edina;in
,the highest manner;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and City Council that the outstanding
accomplishments of the Edina General Sports Softball Team deserve the sincere gratitude
of the citizenry of Edina for the exemplary manner in which the team has conducted
itself and for the great credit the team has brought to the community; and
BE IT FURTER RESOLVED that appropriate copies of this resolution be presented to
Steve Kagol, Steve Erdal, Bart Larson, Bob Haddorff, Bud Bjerkken, Jim Luther,,
Busse, Ron Larsen Jim Gornich Ron Behnin Dale Va ts- Ted,
Jim Berger, Howard , 9, 9 ,
Kobs, John Thorkelson, Roger Peterson, Jim Norman and to player coach Dave Wood.
I _.00AT�ON MAP
-+ IST.ALBAN
► o I ` �s
' ` 'EPISCOP
TOM AL s
W IROO ols
4
Z
CIF C E
;'rHEYE
L.
ClaCLE
• r.
T. PATRI,
a CATHOLIC
a �
t'i u
o a
4w
0 tu
o G��•
U-) -) Q Y
O � '
r Q
SS
��1 f �re7y AR SCOTr�
a
T U P,
Q
7 w Q J
3 W IRC
G' _j j / BRAEeURH
u . Ca
= o All
i
i•"S,' .J v� .!_ J` .,.'• y''� : - \J. `r.J .:'.. \'. >` 1`����? %�i�i.. f n' • ,t 1'� }'! •1'
`; �, ✓.�: "�' .)� "$_�',l. .l- .. �.i. ice'•. i `J: ..l' ••7Jti .i.�'• /. �. +.;i Y�-. t••�,'.�.�.'• \.'
i x:,;` 9R A EMAR :. r �'�;; `1�7 �it''n }.,`j•.i.
S ubdivisio�n
REQUEST NLI51BER : s -76 -13
E of Valley View Road at
LOCATION: the end of Moccasin Valley Rd.
REQUEST: 3 lot single family subdivisioi
N- 61IRge nlen la
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 28, 1976,
S -76 -13 Wright's Addition. Generally located east of Valley View Road,
at the end of Moccasin Valley Road. (continued from 7- 7 -76).
Refer to: Attached survey.
The Planning Commission asked that this matter be held over for one month
so that the adjoining property owner could submit a complimentary plat.
That plat has now been submitted and is entitled "Braemar's Homestead
Addition" (S- 76 -18). The Engineering and Planning staffs have reviewed
both plats together and find their proposed layout for the road to be
adequate. It will be necessary to build Moccasin Valley Road in connection
with these two plats as well as put in the necessary utilities.
Therefore, the staff recommends that, contingent on submission of a
Developer's Agreement satisfactory to the Engineering Department, this
proposed subdivision be. approved for the reasons and conditions stated in
the July 7, 1976, Planning Commission staff report.
GL:ln
7/22/76
t t.
�.-oN
kfi �n
. . .................. .
........... ... . ...........
c ► .� � °.° ��._ _�y; �'mil � � /
s� 9�
B9 6 \
9 �
- I \
Subdivision No. S ''
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FRO14: Planning Department I,
n,
SUBDIVISION hn�iE:
LAND SIZE: d® LAND VALUE: Z% D 6 O
(By:; �S Date: 7-6 -7C )
5% _ $ 35��
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
[] A. grant an easement over part of the land
[] B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ 1 3yo. as a fee in Lieu of land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
[] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
[] 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that. the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
p3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
[] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged
or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
[] 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic
value.
❑ 6•
B.. Cash Required
1. In all other instances - than above.
E] 2.
w
III. SUBI)IVIs n:ls:
S -76 -13 I•Ir�s Addition. Generally located east of Valley View Road, at the
' end of Moccasin Valley Road. Continued from 7 -7 -76.
ANn
S -76 -18 Braemar's Ilomestend Addition. Generally located east and south of
Valley View Road and north and west of bark Terrace Drive.
Mr. Luce presented an area map and clarified that lots in both Wright's
Addition and Braemar's Homestead Addition would have public access to the proposed
extension of Moccasin Valley Road.
Regarding Wright's Addition, Mr. Luce recalled that consideration of that plat
was continued from the July 7, 1976, Planning Commission meeting until a
preliminary plat was submitted for the Wallace Lilja property to the east; that
preliminary plat has been submitted (Braemar's Homestead Addition). Iie recommended
the proposed three lot single family subdivision entitled Wright's Addition be approved
contingent on: 1. submission of a developer's agreement for a portion of the exten-
sion of Moccasin Valley Road; 2. receipt of a fee ($1,350) -An lieu of parkland
dedication; and 3. that a building permit cannot be issued for .lot 3 until the entire
extension of Moccasin Valley Road is dedicated.
After discussion, llr. Runyan moved that "Wright's Addition" be approved with
the three contingencies listed by the staff.
Mr. frank. Cardarelle, the surveyor, indicated the preliminary plat presented
must be modified slightly to locate a utility building on the Wright's lot and to
adjust the lot lines and access for lots 1 and 3.
After further discussion, Mr. Runyan amended his motion to approve the
preliminary plat with the three contingencies listed by the staff (submission of a
developer's agreement and parkland dedication and the building permit
restriction on lot 3) end with the additional contingency that the property owners
(Wrights and Liljas) negotiate to realign Moccasin Valley Road so a better, more
direct access is provided for lot 3. Mr. Hughes seconded the amended motion. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
Regarding Mr. Li.lja's preliminary plat, Braemar's Homestead Addition, Mr. Luce
stated sin Single family lots are proposed, vi.th an average lot size in excess of
16,000 square feet. One of the lots would front on Iiill -A -Way Court; the other
five lots would have access to the proposed extension of Moccasin Valley Road.
Mr. Luce indicated the Engineering Department has expressed concern about the
proposed storm. sever system. That system would carry water from the moccasin Valley
cul -de -sac in a pipe between lots 1 and 2, but would then allow surface water to flow
onto the lots directly north in Moccasin Valley Replat Addition. The Engineering
Department feels surface water should not be allowed to drain onto those lots.
Approval of the preliminary plat was recommended subject to: 1. modification
of the proposed storm sewer system and Engineering; Department approval of the
modification; 2. submission of an approved developer's agreement; 3. dedication of
a fee ($:1,000) in lieu of parkland; and 4. subject to negotiations between the property
owners for a roadway casement over the northerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1,
Braemar's Hill -A -Way Addition.
After additional discussion regarding; the proposed road location and storm
sewer system, Mr. G. Johnson woved the preliminary plait of Braemar's Ilomestend
Addition he approved subject to the four conditions listed by the staff. Mrs.
McDonald seconded the motion. All votecl aye. ]Motion carried.
r
LOCATION MAP
REQUEST NUMBER: S -76 -18
East and south of Vallev View Ri
LOCATION: and Mnccasin Vnllcy Road, and
north and west ot Marc terrace ]
REQUEST: $i -a lot single family
subdivision. See S -76 -13
villnar Wannins department e.l:..-
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 28, 1976
S -76 -18 Braemar's Homestead Addition. Generally located east and south of.
Valley View Road and Moccasin Valley'Road, and north and west of
Mark Terrace Drive.
Refer to: Attached subdivision dedication report and survey.
This is the proposed plat the Planning Commission has been waiting for in
connection with Wright's Addition (S- 76 -13). The proponent is requesting
to divide his property into six single family lots with an average lot
size in excess of 16,000 square feet, which is significantly larger than
the lots within recent subdivisions in that neighborhood. One of the lots
would front on Hillaway Court, with the remaining five lots facing on the
yet to be developed Moccasion Valley Road. In. connection with the
Wright's Addition, the developers should be required to enter into a
developer's agreement with the City Engineering Department. The proponents
are suggesting a storm sewer system which would carry water from the
Moccasin Valley cul -de -sac in a pipe between lots 1 and 2 and then
allowing the water to flow north on the surface into the Moccasin Valley
Replat Addition.
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed plat,
except for the storm sewer proposal which is part of that request. This
recommendation is contingent on the following:
1. The dedication of a fee in lieu of parkland per the attached subdivision
dedication report.
2. Modification of the proposed storm sewer system.
3. Submission of an approved developer's agreement.
This recommendation is made for the following,reasons:
1. The lot sizes are of a similar nature to recently divided lots in the
neighborhood.
2. The proposed use is in conformance with the Southwest Edina Plan.
GL:ln
7/22/76
1�
eJ hyc LGA� i,l �. j p C- A' I �: V n �... c Yt R C r L A-r C w�.
� � -- � • � •.\ ^ , � - -- - -- .% Ply. -- "- \ • \ � ; / , ,,
1 I
ria� •l y a�1 96 cs i �., l 1 i �'� °c t" `i i' � �i� /ON
C ^c. tie -`,,,
� .r � . � '� .� \ � � ` ,/\ ' �� I 1 / � • :ail . ? r ; �
9.
o/
_ r J
1_ AREAS
of OL `C
l�
111/ Lot l 16,090 square ere[
/ C Lot 2 15,500 square :,-et
Lot -3 24,0110 square frvr
1 t / Lot 4 31,000 square feet
c\1 Lot 5 14,0.')7 square `.et
Lot 6 16,009 square :cet
Total aria r 3.94 acres
�2oF'aSSD: �
STC/�D ADD
OWNER A %D DEVELOPER: Wallace [.ilia, 593.1 Vallcy View Road, Celina, Minnesota Phony - 941 -3776
DESCRIPTION: That part of toe N,•rthwf-st Qnnrt,•r of the `:nrth,•ns[ Quarter of Section 7, Township 116, Ranee 21, described
as.folL,w +: R.•glnning at a point nu tit.- N,-rth line of Enid N „rthwest Qunrtrr of the Nor[h,i,t ri:uirter,
d 19tnnt 870 feet ':dsl of th,• Nuril- -i rm•r th.•r,•nf; th,•ne,• Kest along; said North line 57; fret; thence
South 70 f,-et; tlu•nr” Fast 15 fort; lhvnce South U. degrees 72 mintitrs East, 77.40 feet; thence South 26
d.:);rers 75 ml tes E... 211.50 ft-t; thence Norlhenst,•rly to the point of beginning.
DF.SICNI:R AND SURVEYOR: Egan, 1'1.-Id 6 N,nk, lm,., 7415 t(ayzeta I;,,ward. N.Inm•apolls, Minnesots Phone - 546 -6817
NOTE: Tnpographi al Data taken fr,•,n Harry John-in 1, Ava•,clatva Aerial Survey.
I hereby crrtifv that this plan wn•; pr,pnrvd by •ne or,nnder, my direct :;upervislon and that 1 nm a duly RrRl.tered Land Surveyor under
the lays of th.• StAe of Mlnuc+.,t n.
Rated this 15th day of IA.,. 1410,, EGAN, FIELD t. /y,P.lAA, INC.
-
by !i I,II,•••,1: I;,1: 1'il l.:t I.,iy '.s•-' lil..
Subdivision No. 5--76-1 8
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department IIrr I
SUBDIVISION NAME: �hA eM A1��S tb�te S�ckd A��N.
LAND SIZE: LAND VALUE: O� U
(B Date: 7 –Z? -7� )
5% $ 3 00 r
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
RON
grant an easement over part of the land
dedicate % of the land
donate $ 300 0. —
as a fee in lieu of land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
[] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
[J 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
❑ 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
(] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged
or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
[] 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic
value.
❑ 6•
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances -than above.
❑ 2.
III. SUBDIVISIONS:
S -76 -13 Wright's Addition. Generally located east of Valley View Road, at the
end of Moccasin Valley Road. Continued from 7 -7 -76.
.AND
J. S -76 -18 Braemar's Homestead Addition. Generally located east and south of
Valley View Road and north and west of Mark Terrace Drive.
Mr. Luce presented an area map and clarified that lots in both Wright's
Addition and Braemar's Homestead Addition would 'nave public access to the proposed
extension of Moccasin Valley Road.
Regarding Wright's Addition, Mr. Luce recalled that consideration of that plat
was continued from the July 7, 1 976, Planning Commission meeting until a
preliminary plat was submitted for the Wallace Lilja property to the east; that
preliminary plat has been submitted ( Braemar's homestead Addition). He recommended
the proposed three lot single family subdivision entitled Wright's Addition be approved
contingent on: 1. submission of a developer's agreement for a portion of the exten-
sion of Moccasin Valley Road; 2. receipt of a fee ($1,350) --in lieu of parkland
dedication; and 3. that a building permit cannot be issued for lot 3 until the entire
extension of Moccasin Valley Road is dedicated.
After discussion, Mr. Runyan moved that " Wright's Addition" be approved with
the three contingencies listed by the staff.
Mr. Frank Cardarelle, the surveyor, indicated the preliminary plat presented
must be modified slightly to locate a utility building on the Wright's lot and to
adjust the lot lines and access for lots 1 and 3.
After further discussion, Mr. Runyan amended his motion to approve the
preliminary plat with the three contingencies listed by the staff (submission of a
developer's agreement and parkland dedication and the building permit
restriction on lot 3) and with the additional contingency that the property owners
(Wrights and Liljas) negotiate to realign-Moccasin Valley Road so a better, more
direct access is provided for lot 3. Mr. Hughes seconded the amended motion. All
voted aye. Motion carried.
Regarding Mr. Lilja's preliminary plat, Braemar's Homestead Addition, Mr. Luce
stated six single family lots are proposed, with an average lot size in excess of
16,000 square feet. One of the lots would front on Bill -A -Way Court; the other
five lots would have access to the proposed extension of Moccasin Valley Road.
Mr. Luce indicated the Engineering Department has expressed concern about the
proposed storm sewer system. That system would carry water from the Moccasin Valley
cul -de -sac in a pipe between lots 1 and 2, but would then allow surface water to flow
onto the lots directly north in Moccasin Valley Replat Addition. The Engineering
Department feels surface water should not be allowed to drain onto those lots.
Approval of the preliminary plat was recommended subject to: 1. modification
of the proposed storm sewer system and Engineering Department approval of the
modification; 2. submission of an approved developer's agreement; 3. dedication of
a fee ($3,000) in lieu of parkland; and 4. subject to negotiations between the property
owners for a roadway easement over the 'northerly portion of Lot 1, Block 1,
Braemar's Hill -A -Way Addition.
After additional discussion regarding the proposed road location and storm
sewer system, Mr. G. Johnson moved the preliminary plat of Braemar's homestead
Addition be approved subject to the four conditions listed by the staff. Mrs.
McDonald seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
= City", of
`Edina
4501 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 85424
927 -8861
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 1, Minikanda Vista Third Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
The North 24.50 feet of Lot 9 and Lot 10, Block 1, Minikanda
Vista Third Addition, Morningside, Minnesota; and
Lot 9, except the North 24.50 feet thereof, and Lot 8,-Block 1,
Minikanda Vista Third Addition, Morningside, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the pur-
poses of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of
Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as: separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular.Meeting of August 16, 1976, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of August, 1976.
City Clerk
MORNINGSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
of EDINA
August 16, 1976
Clty Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th St.
Edina Mn 55424
Dear Gentlepeople:
U/ r
At the last regular meeting of the Association, a motion was passed
to request the City Council t -o schedule the public hearing on Phase_:
II( curb, gutter, and streets) by December. We understand that the
success of the water main improvement project will be evaluated by
that time.
By holding the hearing in December, there should be enough time.to
work through some of the problems with the residents so that the
project can be bid in the Spring.
The::question was also raised about the possibility of including a.
tree replacement program in the next phase. Is_.it possible to
remove some or all of the elm trees in connection with the street
project? Are there funds available?
We .would like to take this opportunity to thank the City Planning
Department, particularly Greg Luce and Lynnae Nye, for their help
in obtaining funds for home improvements in the area.
CC: City Manager
City Engineer
Sincerely,
Z4 25;J 07"~
John W. Jefferson
President
RESOLUTION APPROVUG FINAL PLAT OF
DREIS ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,
that that certain plat entitled "Dreis Addition ", platted by Edward
G. Thernell and Beverly M. Thernell, husband and wife, and by Piestige
Investments, Inc., and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of
August 16, 1976, be and is hereby.granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COMITY .OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY.OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do'hereby .certify that the attached and foregoing resolution
was duly adopted by the Edina City Council�at its Regular Meeting of
August 16, 1976, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITHBSS my hand and seal of said City this 17th_ day of August, 19760
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 6TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,
that that certain plat entitled "McCauley heights 6th Addition ",
'platted by Betty J. McCauley and presented at the Edina City Council
Lieeting "of August 16, 1976, be and is hereby granted final plat
approval.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
STATE OF MITNZSOTA
COUNTY OF hIENNEPIN ss
CITY OF E"DINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I. the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution
was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its.Regular Meeting of
August 16, 1976, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular
Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of August, 1976.
City Clerk
�t WE�THE MERCHANTS OF 50TH STREET DO NOT WANT BUS SHELTERS CONSTRUCTED
m1., -1 "TT ATT/1T AI TT. ITTTT ATTT1 VAT TTlAV I
V1V V111 U11iL'L'1 1J L'1rr L'l:AL 111111YVL llr Llr "IT11
r
33 40
rr
, �o
rul
D
_ � ,✓ , .;�� � y 7 vim" " � /
G qiU 50
-fo .—
7V1,- ,� o
M E M 0 R A N D U M
August 13, 1976
MEMO. TO: Mr. Warren C. Hyde
City Council
FROM: Ken Rosland, Director
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Purchase of Nursery Stock
Purchase of Lumber - Replacement Boards for Hockey Rinks
At the present time, three informal quotes have been received for the purchase
of nursery stock for implementing the recently adopted tree replacement program.
The trees are 2 to 2 112 inches in diameter, bare root and delivered. The
Informal bids are as follows:
Marshall Ash
Homedale Nursery $16.70 each
Baileys 16.80 each
.Cross None Available
Norway Maple
Homedale $19.90
Baileys None Available/ equivalent tree $20.00 each
Cross None Available/ equivalent tree $19.00 each
American Linden
Homedale $21.00
Baileys None Available
Cross 21.00
Sugar Maple
Homedale $23.00
Baileys None Available
Cross $23.00
Recommend purchase from Homedale,Nursery for 250 trees for a total purchase
price of $4,865.00.
Also two quotes have been obtained for the purchase of 300 pieces of fir(2 1'X12 1'X161)
lumber to repair the boards at the various hockey rinks. They are as folluws:
I. Har -Ned Lumber Company, 5825 Excelsior Boulevard - $11.84 each for a total
of $3,552.00.
2. Thompson Lumber Company, 3220 West Lake Street - $13.93 each for a total
of $4,180.00.
Recommend award to liar -Ned Lumber Company for a total purchase price of $3,552.00.
I!
is-- -�B`�. :�:7
I
I�
1
1
I
j
I�
i�
i�
I
_J LU
W
O
Q
• O
Ua-< 0)z s
Cn . a C:
a�`�inars
Cn
a (on the
._,
To help you apply for $3.25
s a
billion in public works and
3
countercyclical grants; and
o
information on an additional
$700 million in water pollution
.T -r L O : �
construction funds.
o��32Z
�O ti
-r m
N !- tzl,
UN "I
UN MIA nC J.-.
t-a •-..� G.-r O
MARK �p��y(
■I A ■K THESE DATES
_
AND LOCATIONS
Aug. 31 Sept. 2
San Francisco Denver
Dallas Chicago
a 8 C)
Boston Atlanta
• 3
.0
Q1 z N
Ch a) t (
J
Q
C Cl)
O
O
3
% w �
Sponsored by
a� ° CU
The National League of Cities and
a
Your State Municipal League
�'ou e �;li�ble
Virtually all local governments are eligible for
public works grants; an estimated 27,000
local governments qualify for countercyclical
payments; and 34 states will receive addi-
tional water pollution construction grants =in
all, the Public Works Employment Act of 1976
has the potential for $3.95 billion in federal
aid to states and local governments.
The on u
This is a one -day meeting designed to brief
you on the three titles of the Act and to pro-
vide technical assistance on applying for
Title I Public Works grants. Staff from the
Economic Development Administration (the
agency whose responsibility it is to distribute
these funds) are expected to serve as tech-
nical resource persons at these meetings.
Sennhar & hedule
8:30 -9:30 a.m. REGISTRATION
9:30 a.m. -noon OPENING SESSION
A general overview of the act and a de-
tailed examination of the regulations and
applications for Title I Public Works grants.
noon -1:30 p.m. LUNCH
1:30 -4:30 p.m. SMALL,GROUP
DISCUSSIONS
To answer your questions on eligibility,
regulations, applications.
d ie .RZ e f afi®
im-
I plan to attend the Public Works
Employment Act of 1976 seminar to be held
in (city)
on (date)
Name
Title
Address
City
Telephone ( )
State Zip
Name of local government or
agency you
represent
REGISTRATION FEE
El Member Cities $35
❑ Non - Member Cities $60
CHECK ONE
• Payment enclosed
• Will pay on site
(includes lunch)
(includes lunch)
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO:
The NLC Public Works Seminars
1620 Eye St., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
FOR OFFICE USE
Amount Due
Check Number
Cash
Amount Paid
Type
Receipt Number
Hotel . Re&fi-afion
NLC PUBLIC WORKS SEMINARS
AUGUST 31, 1976 AND
SEPTEMBER 2, 1976
Check the appropriate hotel and rate you
want and use reverse side to mail this form to
that hotel.
• SAN FRANCISCO: Holiday Inn — Golden Gateway,
1500 Van Ness Ave., San Francisco, CA 94109
Tel. (415) 441 -4000
❑ Single $36 O Double $42
• DALLAS: Fairmont Hotel, Ross & Ackard Sts.,
Dallas, TX 75201
Tel. (214) 748 -5454
❑ Single $30 ❑ Double $40
• BOSTON: The Parker House, 60 School Street,
Boston, MA 02108
Tel. (617) 227 -8600
❑ Single $35 ❑ Double $43
• DENVER: Regency Hotel, 3900 Elati Ave., Denver,
CO 80216
Tel. (303) 458 -5511
❑ Single $28 ❑ Double $36
• CHICAGO: Hyatt Regency O'Hare, 9300 W. Bryn
Mawr, Rosemont, IL 60018
Tel. (312) 696 -1234
❑ Single $30 ❑ Double $35
❑ ATLANTA: Fairmont Colony Square, 14th &
Peachtree Sts., Atlanta, GA 30361
Tel. (404) 892 -6000
❑ Single $29 ❑ Double $39
Na
Title
Address
City
State Zip
-
I will. arrive Depart
n
r. -l.. i
PROPOSED
ROSTER OF PRIMARY ELECTION OFFICIALS
. TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1976
PRECINCT
NO. 1 - SHEPHERD OF HILLS CHURCH
2 Voting Machines
1.
Mrs.
Lois Hallquist, Chairlady
305
Grove Place
2.
Mrs.
Jane Fleet
6420
Mendelssohn Lane
3.
Mrs.
Barbara Anderson
413
Arthur St.
4.
Mrs.
Rosita Barber
6419
Mendelssohn Lane
Mrs.
Alternate - Mrs. Loraine Cline
6424
Belmore Lane
PRECINCT NO. 2 - EDINA CITY HALL
1. Mrs. Joyce Akason, Chairlady
2. Mrs. Jean McDermid
3. Mrs. Judith Sotebeer
4. Mrs. Naomi Johnson
Alternate - Mrs. Margaret Maki
4 Judges
938 -5886
935 -3826
938 -1160
935 -3781
933 -3460
2 Voting Machines 4 Judges
5217 Grandview Lane 929 -7924
5116 Mirror Lakes Drive 929 -8859
5002 Mirror Lakes Drive 929 -8653
5141 Bedford Ave. 929 -0975
4520 Oxford Ave. 926 -7779
PRECINCT
NO. 3 - WOODDALE SCHOOL
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Evelyn Anderson
5209
Wooddale Ave.
922 -4662
2.
Mrs.
Patricia Johnson, Chairlady
4912
Sunnyside Road
926 -4160
3.
Mrs.
Marjorie Rossiter
5300
Kellogg Ave.
922 -7502
4.
Mrs.
Sherry Estensen
4528
Arden Ave.
926 -0655
Alternate - Mrs. Jane Hanson
4405
W. 44th St.
926 -0404
..PRECINCT
NO. 4 - MORNINGSIDE BUILDING
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Shirley Dibble, Chairlady
4212
France Ave. So.
926 -4048
2.
Mrs.
Alice Rose
4011
Kipling Ave.
926 -0159
3.
Mrs.
Jeanette Lushine
4166
Monterey Ave.
926 -0576
4.
Mrs.
Rachel Schoening
4014
Monterey Ave.
922 -5457
,.
Alternate -.Mrs. Kathryn Stamp
4017
Morningside Road
922 -9324
- ....PRECINCT
NO. 5 HIGHLANDS SCHOOL
2 Voting Machines
4-'Judges
1. ,
Mrs.
Henrietta Bartlett, Chairlady
5512
Mirror Lakes Drive
929 -4738
2..
Mrs.
Carol Ledder
5409
Chntrey Road
929 -5920
3.
Mrs.
Phyllis Cooper
5500
Mirror Lakes Drive
925 -1594.
4.
Mrs.
Sue Holden
6016
Tamarac Ave.
935 -5430
Alternate - Mrs. Carol McPheeters
5409
Doncaster Way
929 -4742
PRECINCT
NO. 6 - COUNTRYSIDE SCHOOL
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Jane Baines, Chairlady
6101
Tracy Ave.
929 -9362
2..
Mrs.
Barbara Casselman
5825
W. 61st St.
920 -0937
3.
Mrs.
Catherine Swanson
5804
Merold Drive
929 -8387 .
4.
Mrs.
Hope Eilers
5513
Ridge Park Road
929 -2239
Alternate - Mrs. Claire MacLennon
6060
Olinger Circle
929 -8496
- PRECINCT
NO. 7 - NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH
2 Voting Machines
.4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Bess Brudelie, Chairlady
5305
Forslin Drive
929 -8734
2:.
Mrs.
Helen Peterson
6121
Code Ave.
929 -7067
3.
Mrs.
Naomi Ward
5916
Hansen Road
929 -1074
4.
Mrs.
Barbara Matheson
5609
Bernard Place
922 -6431
Alternate: Mrs. Doris Hartshorn
5232
W. 56th St.
929 -5337
PRECINCT
NO. 8 - EDINA EAST UPPER DIVISION
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Audrey Berglund, Chairlady
5513
Park Place
926 -6282
.
2.
Mrs.
Maxine Sanders
4532
Tower Ave.
926 -1969
3.
Mrs.
Betty Tripp
4613
St. Andrews Ave.
926 -5746
4.
Mrs.
Margaret Kinney
4513
Oak Drive
926 -2676
Alternate - Mrs. Constance Ryan
5529
Oaklawn Ave.
922 -9053
PRECINCT
NO. 9 - CONCORD SCHOOL
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Yvonne Ford, Chairlady
4831
Valley View Road
922 -6606
2.
Mrs.
Jean Erdahl
5828
Oaklawn Ave.
922 -9202
3.
Mrs.
Dorothy Nonnweiler
6325
Ashcroft Lane
922 -3267
4.
Mrs.
Elaine Olson
5921
Ashcroft Ave.
922 -6315
Alternate - Mrs. Kay Bach
6316
Halifax Ave.
927 -6738
PRECINCT
NO. 10 - CREEK VALLEY SCHOOL
2 Voting
Machines
4 Judges
1.
Mrs.
Lorraine Hasselquist, Chairlady
6712
Arrowhead Pass
941 -3957
2.
Mrs.
Mary Bartz
7017
Mark Terrace Drive
941 -5916
3.
Mrs:
Gay Bostock
6224
Loch Moor Drive
941 -1531
4.
Mrs.
Virginia Bodine
6525
Gleason Road
941 -1206
Alternate
- Mrs. Ann Overholt
70..Overholt Pass
944 -1610
P.roposed
Roster of Primary Election Officials
Tuesday, September 14, 1976
Page Two
PRECINCT NO. 11 - CAHILL SCHOOL
1. Mrs. Geneva Smith, Chairlady
2. Mrs. Gloria Thorburn
3. Mrs. Anna Taggatz
4. Mrs. Eleanor Thornton
Alternate - Mrs. Barbara Boyd
PRECINCT NO. 12 - CORNELIA SCHOOL
1. Mrs. Adele Olson, Chairlady
2. Mrs. Mary McDonald
3. Mrs. Diane Greensweig
4. Mrs. Doris Van Campen
.Alternate - Mrs. Phyllis Taylor
PRECINCT NO. 13 - LUTHERAN CHURCH OF MASTER
1. Mrs. Patricia Harmon, Chairlady
2. Mrs. Mavis deLambert
3. Mrs. Margaret Delaney
4. Mrs. Marie Crask
Alternate - Mrs. Marilyn Person
PRECINCT NO. 14 - ST. PETERS CHURCH
1. 'Mrs. Mary Jane Platt, Chairlady
2. Mrs. Ruth Volk
3. Mrs. Jeanette.Lund
4. Mrs. Esther Olson
Alternate - Mrs. Louise Carlson
2 Voting Machines 4- Judges
6344 Rolf Ave. 941 -2471
5188 Abercrombie Drive 941 -4710
6440 Wilryan Ave. 941 -3996
5205 Danens Drive 941 -3244
6532 Ridgeview Dr. 941 -3421
2 Voting Machines 4 Judges
6825 Oaklawn Ave. 926 -4552
6929 Southdale Road 926 -7860
6716 Southdale Road 926 -8522
6920 Dawson Lane 926 -3287
6621 Normandale'Road 922 -3410
2 Voting Machines
4 Judges
7129
Cornelia Drive
926 -0256
4440
Ellsworth Drive
922 -1590
4515
W. 70th St.
926 -4818
4717
Hibiscus Ave.
922 -8765
4800
Larkspur Lane
926 -1409
2 Votine Machines
5504 Beard Ave. S.
3616 W. Fuller St.
5809 Drew Ave. S.
5441 York Ave. S.
3700 Chowen Curve
PRECINCT NO. 15 - EDINA WEST UPPER DIVISION 2 Voting Machines
1.
Mrs.
Charlotte Burns, Chairlady
5820
Dewey Hill Road
2.
Mrs.
Patricia Olander
7001
Lee Valley Circle
3.
Mrs.
Lucille Borchers
6812
Limerick Lane
4.
Mrs.
Rosemary Sweeney
6809
Hillside Lane
Geraldine Sermeta
Alternate - Mrs. Maxine Hatzung
6613
Cahill Road
PRECINCT
NO. 16 - SOUTHDALE- HENNEPIN LIBRARY
3 Voting Machines
1.
Mrs.
Betty Doolittle, Chairlady
7512
Xerxes Ave. S.
2.
Mrs.
Lucille Russ
4480
Parklawn Ave.
3.
Mrs.
Edith Housh
4401
Parklawn Ave.
4.
Mrs.
Geraldine Sermeta
7600
Xerxes. Ave. S.
Alternate: Mrs. Ruth Fitzmaurice
6400
York Ave. S.
4 Judges
926 -8447
922 -1651
922-6901
926 -1006
926 -6253
4 Judges
941 -4108
944 -2185
941 -1950
944 -1310
941 -4746
4 Judges
866 -4438
926 -8970
922 -7945
866 -9594
920 -9783
r
I
Iq
&e
x
4` 2
p' 1
. R
DIONYSUS
On August 17, Dionysus will hold its first Minneapolis based wine tasting.
It shall be the goal -of Dionysus to strip away the mystique and pretentions
often identified with tasting wines. It is our contention that the enjoyment
of wine is an important and gratifying extension of the pleasure of good food
and friends.
Our first tasting will include wines from every major wine producing -
area of the world, to include France, Germany and California. The tasting
will be held as a mill- around affair, allowing us to become acquainted and
to discuss future plans for our club.
The tasting will be held at 8:00 PM at tie Biltmore Motor Hotel in the
Cavalier Room, 5212 Vernon avenue South ( 4 blocks west of Hwy 100).
The cost will be $5. 00 per couple; $3. 00 single.
Please send your reservations to:
France 44 Liquors, Inc.
4351 France Avenue So
Minneapolis, Mn 55410
Your Name:
Address: '
Phone:
I certify that I was 18 years old prior to September 1, 1976.
NOTE: Applications are now being taken for membership in the
Dionysus Wine Club.. For information, call 925 -3252. .
612-926-92S2
cJa,ce 44
CORNER OF 44th & FRANCE • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55410
1
W2 teaWe: • FAST DELIVERY • CONVENIENT PARKING • PARTY PLANNING • COMPLETE WINE SELECTION
X ,4
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
-
CITY OF EDINA
As at June 30, 1976
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash:
Demand Deposits
$
378,206.67
Working Fund
3,500.00
$ 381,706.67
Investments
102,954.86
Due from Other Funds
174.75
Loan To Other Funds
415,000.00
Inventory:
Liquor
$
499,852.88
- Wine
181,756.57
Beer and Mix
20,518.08
702,127.53
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
$
9,617.48.
Supplies Inventory
400.00
10,017.48
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
$1,611,981.29
FIXED ASSETS AT COST:
Land
$
151_,448.85
Land Improvements
$ 21,945.62
Buildings
455,911.08
Furniture and Fixtures
149,325.01
Leasehold Improvements
3,035.55
$630,217.26.
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and
Amortization
201,977.75
428,239.51
$
579,688.36 1
Construction in Progress
3,079.08 1
582,767.44
TOTAL ASSETS
$2,194,748.73
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
$ 125,995.21
Accrued Payroll
4,134.00
$ 130,129.21
SURPLUS:
Invested in Fixed Assets
$
582,767.44
Unappropriated
1,481,852.08
2,064,619.52
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
$2,194,748.73
)PERATIN G EXPENSE
5
28,048.63
$ 32,574.63
$ 25,886.90 $
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
34,089.93$
32,660.00 $
:-
$
93,095.56
$
6,041.30*
$
85.37*$
429.30
458.73*$
116.56
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INI;OME AND EXPENSE
Selling
Overhead
6,727.29
14,200.23
10,935.20
31,862.72
6,592.50
20 724.69
13,770.93
22P289.25
10,818.64
19,759.21
7.69
10.38%
31,182.07
62,773.15
CITY OF EDINA
134.79
4,730.42
.57%
5,145.70
5,828.86
15 704.98
Administrative
25,455.11
2T,434.95
25 588.07
78 478.13
1.44
Six Months Ending June 30, 1976 and June 30,.1975
1.22
1.30
2.12
.42
.57
.95
NET INCO
TOTAL OPERATI
60 231.03
74 209.81
$ 62 410.17 $
196 851.01 $
61,407.12$
68 720.18 $
INCREASE - DECREASED
$
187 050.78
$
1,176.09*
$
5,489.63 $
5,486.69 $
1975
EXPENS
NET OPERA ; id - 21297.18*
$ 57,097.57
$ 28,722.88 $
83,523.27 $
34,825.70$
92,837.49 $
38,378.94
soth At
Yorkdalp
Grandview
Total
50th St Yorkdal.e -.
Grandview
Total
r `50th St.
Yorkdale Grandview Total
ALES:
Liquor
$249,790.43
$465,876,67
$380,830.25
$1,096,497.35
$358,899.13 $534,051.80
$370,952.85
$1,263,903.78
$109,108.70*
$ 68,175.13*$ 9,877.40
$167,406.43*
Wine
70,484.22
163,726.65
117,171.55
351,382.42
103,506.98 174,425.91
103,452.48
381,385.37
33,022.76*
3,190.20
10,699.26* 13,719.07
30,002.95*
Beer
84,049.46
154,816.13
112,128.26
350,993.85
134,310.99 181,945.93
104,312.20
420,569.12
50,261.53*
82.69*
27,129.80* 7,816.06
69,575.27*
110.16
Mix and Miscellaneot4 72415.74
15 325.13
11 727.66
34 468.53
12 207.79 17 499.72
12 575.62
42 283.13
4,792.05*
Income on invet --`-
Other
2,174.59* 847.96* 7,814.60A
2,202.29
1,649.81
$411,739.85
$799,744.58
$621,857.72
$1,833,342.15
$608,924.89 $907,923.36
$591,293.15
$2,108,141.40
$197,185.04*
$108,178.78*$30,564.57
$274,799.25*
5,071.53
Less boftle refunds.
NET SALES
7,8-70.58
13 679.48
11 082.31
32 632.37
10 499.98 _14,124.8
$598,424.91 $893,798.47
9,845.50
$581,447.65
34 470.37
$2,073,671.03
2,629.40*
$194,555.64*
1Q_721 -59
445.41* 1,236.81
$107.,733.37*$29,327.76
1
$272,961.25-A
838.00A
6.467.03 $
$403,869.27
$786,065.10
$610,775.41
.$1,800,709.78
:C;T OF SALES: 1
Inventory - lanua4172,534.05
$214,596.83
$219,022.28
$ 606,153.16
$191,471.96 $210,403.16
$218,397.83
$ 620,272.95
$ 18,937.91*
$ 4,193.67 $ 624.45
14,119.791
Purchases
;357,693.93
706 291.91
552 324.03
1,616,309.87
531 438.32 797 402.00
$722,910.28$1,007,805.16
533 146.00
$751,543.83
1,861,986.32
$2,482,259.27
173 744.39*
$192,682.30*
91,110.09* 19 178.03
$ 86,916 42*$19 802.48
245 676.45,
$259,796.24,
Inrenro Nine 30
$530,227.98
$920,888.74
266 131.02
$771,346.31
251 703.95
$2,222,463.03
702 127.53
220 718.19 275 564.36
265 398.60
761 681.15
36,425.63*
9 433.34* 13,694.65* 59
553.621
184 292.56
345935.42
$654,757.72
$519,642.36
$1,520,335.50
$502,192.09$ 732 240.80
$486,145.
$1,720,578.12
$ 353,092.91
156
$ 38,298.97*
256.67*
$ 77 483.08 33 497.13
$ 30,250.29*$ 4,169.37*$
$200
72,718.63
242.624
Gaols Pao
$ 579933.85
$131,307.38
$ 91,133.05
$
$ 96,232.82$ 161,557.67
$ 95,302.42
)PERATIN G EXPENSE
5
28,048.63
$ 32,574.63
$ 25,886.90 $
86,510.16 $
34,089.93$
32,660.00 $
26,345.63
$
93,095.56
$
6,041.30*
$
85.37*$
429.30
458.73*$
116.56
6,585.40
680.65
Selling
Overhead
6,727.29
14,200.23
10,935.20
31,862.72
6,592.50
20 724.69
13,770.93
22P289.25
10,818.64
19,759.21
7.69
10.38%
31,182.07
62,773.15
9.02
8.01%
134.79
4,730.42
.57%
5,145.70
5,828.86
15 704.98
Administrative
25,455.11
2T,434.95
25 588.07
78 478.13
1.44
1.29
1.22
1.30
2.12
.42
.57
.95
NET INCO
TOTAL OPERATI
60 231.03
74 209.81
$ 62 410.17 $
196 851.01 $
61,407.12$
68 720.18 $
56 923.48
$
187 050.78
$
1,176.09*
$
5,489.63 $
5,486.69 $
9,800.23
EXPENS
NET OPERA ; id - 21297.18*
$ 57,097.57
$ 28,722.88 $
83,523.27 $
34,825.70$
92,837.49 $
38,378.94
$
166,042.13
$
37,122.88*
$
35,739.92*$
9,656.06*$
82,518.861
PROFIT
)THER INCOME:
3,621.53
8,071.05
5,805.71
17,498.29
2,306.25
3,809.04
3,190.20
9,305.49
1,315,28
4,262,01
2,615.51
8,192,80
129.19,
Cash Discount
Cash over or under
.55*
60.45*
21.69*
82.69*
.48*
63.18*
110.16
46.50
9 390.00
.07*
9',390.00*
2.73
131.85*
9,390.00,
Income on invet --`-
Other
2 201.03
2,202.29
1,649.81
6,053.13
9,390.00
981.60
,
981.60
1,219.43
2,202.29
1,649.81
5,071.53
A
,., e-9'7 13-76
q '74C QG e
Q ann 1A
C
1Q_721 -59
S
6.855.36*
S
6.467.03 $
4,133.47 $
3,745.14
NET INCO
-
3- 524.83
67 310.46
$ 36 156.71
06
$ l",992.00
47,503.07$
PERCENT TO NET SALES:.
Gross profit
14.34%
16.70%
14.92%
15.57%
16.08%
18.07%
16.39%
17.03%
Operating expenses
14.91
9.44
10.22
10.93
4.64%
10.26
5.82%
7.69
10.38%
9.79
6.60%
9.02
8.01%
Operating profit
.57%
7,26%
4.70%
Other income
1.44
1.29
1.22
1.30
2.12
.42
.57
.95
NET INCO
,.87%
8.56%
5.92%
5.94%
7.94%
10.80%
7.17%
8.96%
. It
DATE: August 10, 1976
Memo TO: Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council
FROM: John O'Sullivan
SUBJECT: HCCJC Assessment by National.League of Cities /U. S. Conference
of Mayors
At the August 4, 1976, monthly meeting of the Hennepin County Criminal Justice
Council, the Council voted unanimously to request technical assistance from
the National League of Cities /U. S. Conference of Mayors Criminal Justice
Project..
On August 10, 1976, the NLC /USCM Criminal Justice. Project advised the HCCJC
that it was pleased to accept the invitation and has scheduled their on -site
assessment for August 25 -27, 1976. While a portion of the on -site visit will
be devoted to exploring issues related to the historical development and cur-
rent role and responsibility of the HCCJC, the major emphasis will be a series
of meetings with city of Minneapolis, Hennepin County and suburban Hennepin
County government officials.
The HCCJC and NLC /USCM staff are currently finalizing the schedule for the
on -site visit. As soon as that process has been completed, specific informa-
tion as to meeting dates and times will be forwarded to you.
JO: bjr
cc: Jean Burhardt
Chris Cherches
Richard Henneberger
Warren Hyde
Harlyn Larson
Barkley Omans
John Pidgeon
Jim Willis
t-.0CATION
MWIAMMIMMME
r-Illi I
FAM L - WAA
a �'MAMI
AM.Y
c"
CO
LL
REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-16
W of Olinger Road, S of Vernor
LOCATION: Avenue, E of Blake Ridge
REQUEST: 4 lot single family
subdivision.
404
14
SAMA'F
IETHOE
OD U
SIDE
ELEME
- -1 J
Villnize. nlanni rr cl rinteret Villnee of edin
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 28, 1976
5 -76 -16 Robert Middlemist 2nd Addition. Generally located west of
Olinger Road, south of Vernon Avenue, and east of the Blake
Ridge townhouses.
Refer to: Attached Planning Commission staff report dated
July 7, 1976, and minutes.
The Planning Commission may recall that this matter was held over for one
month pending the installation of a sign by the developer per the
subdivision ordinance requirement. That sign was almost immediately
erected on the site, and thus the proposed plat should now be considered.
GL:ln
7/22/76
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT "
July 7, 1976
S -76 -16 Robert Middlemist 2nd Addit ion. Generally located west of Olinger
Road, south of Vernon Avenue, and east of the Blake Ridge townhouses.
Refer to: Attached survey and area map.
The proponents are requesting to subdivide a portion.of property located
behind two single family homes which face easterly onto Olinger Road. The
proposed lots would vary in size from 12,000 to 16,240 square feet. The
lots in the neighborhood average about 20,000 square feet. However, none
of these lots are recent subdivisions. Those lots in the nearby area which '
have been platted in the last ten years average about 12,000 to 15,000 square
feet. The proposed configuration of this plat allows for future divisions
by adjacent owners without having to create neck lots or other odd - shaped
lots. The staff would recommend approval of the proposed lot division
contingent on:
1. submission of a 5% cash donation in lieu of parkland dedication;
2. The developer must enter into and receive approval of a Developer's
Agreement.
GL:ln
7/2/76
>
r
•
SA ONY
C.)
woo I .. :�; I . 3., .1 •. I
0
HIGH D
4
uy,� -1'�; -4
DDMON ra 5
A j
r 10
Wd. - :, - 1:) -s , � -
ANDERSON Pirli&�HIGHWU f, 'A
14
uu
_ES
-41 Ij 1, 'OVDEE
q
LE 5t-f E LANE -. - Au
4661TI& a • SECOND
2 tz ILLI
z
<
EFFREY 5 vt If Lp . - 't _
7 ow
z x
DIR I Vt
4
7
4
zi
JONES-
R OAD
kk
V ll �1034
KO 2
t3
_j
Z3 q
01
ff.7
95 jai
0I
9
a w
2
A 11�1 �10
P-7 •r a5l q ` -4, , - :
34 10
N 21
m:Iry i4 2r
T Im . I :�: !� I-, I - t; '-
P.
V,
3
`.-I A'
15
i,v
3
Yr
MIAN L -�y
STREET
4F 14
_T
L,-S
40
!4,
-f7
G
3 4 j
to 5
Z;.x
5y, .. IV
25- S,
4 Iwo z
f 10
tif
Iry
lul A
(1400)
C,ty -f Ed;n-
2,
I
it
4
10
O.'s FRI D
v
e-
_bENK;
kq
6
14.
6v
PRELIMINARY PLAT. ROBERT MIDDL EMIS T
r
.. s
i N
I
S
2ND ADD J
a R
B lake Ridge
Addl4ion
Mc Gary Adds +ion
IO,L4o O M t
\
11
I
t, / /
1
,N
ro
1
=;/
I
—
R. L. 540 ,,._ , -', -�
- —�
,
1
=- = ��—
'
13i
i
1 /
��
\
1
-�
% 7
i
t," OJrellel watt. e $ou -tt. 1" �•C
hoS
$4/ Y4
I _•
r
V WVA °± Sc. Scc. 2 T 11 R 21���,
BLOCK't 1 1
_
OI' \
if, 50001\. 1 1 11 12,000 aft.
I
1
..�
/
I
"
,\
r -
w
\ Its
♦` 116
' 9N�
•
`1 \` \ •- � �
`
L� \ \ 11 1 1 I
� i
t
`414-
got
.
\ \ g10.B
it
i
400
• 698
v `
`gy00 o p
\
Q,•� �\
I1 `\
\� 54.0
OVTLoT %70.0 A
o
\/•
• \ \\
��
'� \ IN
-
G ROVE '4
CIRCLE
• \
INV10.i
°e
4014
Y \ \ \ � \ 8 I PY.0 .
B lake Ridge
Addl4ion
OVTLOT 9 ( LLJ \ \tiOB t
/ 239.6
ww 1cj 3a, T. ui H /L1 �z _ �♦ .
1 \ t AVE LoT AREA / \
1 \t \\ 14,18$ aft.
33
< of Me +h Ipo f
IO,L4o O M t
\
11
► ;
t, / /
1
,N
ro
—
�rT�V
\
% 7
\ o
OVTLOT 9 ( LLJ \ \tiOB t
/ 239.6
ww 1cj 3a, T. ui H /L1 �z _ �♦ .
1 \ t AVE LoT AREA / \
1 \t \\ 14,18$ aft.
33
< of Me +h Ipo f
. 0
S -76 -16 Robert Middlemist 2nd Addition. Generally located west of Olinger
Road. south of Vernon Avenue, and east of the Blake Ridge townhouses.
Mr. Luce recalled this matter was continued from the last Planning Commission
meeting because the requisite subdivision sign had not been installed by the
developer. The sign was since erected on the site.
3`
4 '7
..JULti6 +d
Mr. Luce stated the proponent has requested approval of a four lot single family
subdivision with two long, narrow outlots - along proposed "Grove Circle ". The lot
sizes vary from 12,000 to 16,240 square feet. He indicated that while the lot
sizes in the immediate neighborhood average about 20,000 square feet, the lot sizes
in more recently platted subdivisions in the vicinity are about 12- 15,000 square
feet. Mr. Luce reconmended the proposed preliminary plat be approved inasmuch as
the lot sizes are in conformance with the average for recently platted properties
near the site in question, and the land use is in conformance with the Western
Edina Land Use Plan; approval should, however, be contingent on donation of a
parkland dedication fee ($1,500) and submission of an acceptable developer's agreement
for the necessary utilities and construction of Grove Circle. In addition, the
proposed outlots should.be eliminated and that land should be incorporated into the
street right of way because if those parcels are labelled outlots, the lack of
public access would unduly restrict future development of the adjacent lots.
Mr. Bob Chance, 5804 Olinger Road, reviewed the lot sizes in the neighborhood
and observed that the proposed lots are considerably smaller than those in the area,
particularly those lots immediately adjacent to the property in question and along
both .sides of Olinger Road. Mr. Dennis tdegner, 5705 Olinger Road, agreed. Iie
suggested a three lot subdivision would.be more desirable. Mr. Luce presented a
graphic of the area clarifying that although the lot sizes in.the immediate
neighborhood range from 18,000 to 104,000 square feet, the lots in more recently
platted areas are about 10,800 square feet.
Mrs. Pauline Wilson, former owner of the subject property, pointed out that
the property is completely screened from the south by large trees. She cited land
costs, taxes, and the preference of more and more people for the development of
smaller lots in more recent subdivisions.
Mr. Orville Walker, 5720 Olinger Road, felt the character of the neighborhood
would be destroyed if smaller lots were allowed. He also expressed concern that
Olinger Road would become a "trunk highway before long because of the number of
proposed developments in the area ".
i
Noting that the proposed lot sizes appear to be in.conformance with recently
platted properties near the site in question and, in any event, will exceed the
minimum lot size requirements, Mr. Kremer moved the proposed plat of "Robert
Middlemist 2nd Addition" be approved provided: 1. Outlots A and B are eliminated
and the land is incorporated into the right of way; 2. a 5% cash donation ($1,500)
is dedicated in lieu of parkland; and 3. the developer enters into an acceptable
developer's agreement for the utilities and street construction. Mr. Hughes seconded.
the motion. All voted aye. Notion carried.
Y
x
f, s
ri
a
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
MRS. PAUL FOSS
WHEREAS, Mrs. Paul (Margaret) Foss was an active and talented artist; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Foss was instrumental in the development of community art
in Edina as shown through her efforts in establishing the Manamore Art
Center; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Foss through her own inspiration and talent, designed
several Edina residences, furthering the high standards traditional to
Edina's homes; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Foss passed away on August 3, 1976; following a long ill-
ness; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Foss was a resident of the City of Edina from 1947 to 1968;
and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Foss was very supportive of her husband, Paul, who was a
member of the Edina Park Board and active in many phases of Edina City
Government;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina Council does hereby
express its deepest sympathy to the family of
MRS. PAUL FOSS
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City appreciates and gratefully
accepts the designation of memorial funds to the future art center; and
BE IT RESOLVED FURTHER that copies..of.thrs resolution be presented to Mr.
Paul Foss and to her daughters, Mrs. Christopher Dahl and Mrs. Robert
Lipke.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
— MAYOR
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
MRS. HOWARD R. NICHOLS
WHEREAS, Mrs. Howard R. (Elaine F.) Nichols was a resident of the City
of Edina since 1939; and
WHEREAS, during these years, Mrs. Nichols, who was fondly known as Tede
to her many friends, served her community as a charter member and a
past President of the Edina League of Women Voters; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Nichols devoted many years to Girl Scout activities in
Edina, being the organizing leader of a troup of Brownies and continu-
ing as the leader of that troup until the girls graduated from high
school; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Nichols, as a member of the Minnesota Artist's Associ-
ation, was well known and admired in Edina art circles; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Nichols had been an active member of The Church of St.
Stephen the Martyr; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Nichols' vitality and enthusiasm in her many and varied
interests endeared her to all with whom she was associated over the
years; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Nichols passed away on August 3, 1976, following a long
illness;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby
express its deepest sympathy to the family of
MRS. HOWARD R. NICHOLS
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be spread
upon the pages of the Minutes Book of the City of Edina and that appro-
Priate copies be given to Mr. Howard R. Nichols, to her daughter, Mrs.
Jack Wilferd, and to her son, Mr. Terry L. Nichols.
ADOPTED this 16th day of August, 1976.
MAYOR