HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976-10-18_COUNCIL MEETINGROLLCALL
MINUTES of September.20, 1976, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of ,
seconded by
RECOGNITION OF LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
PROCLAMATION OF YOUTH APPRECIATION WEEK
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Presentation by City Manager and
Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution
Ordering.Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Street Improvement No. P -BA -220 - W. 69th Street.from France to Xerxes Ave.
(Continued from 9/20/76) .
B. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -19 - South side W. 69th St. from France Ave.
to Xerxes Ave. (Continued f.rom'9 /20/76)
C. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -333 - Marth Road from W. 78th St. North
440' (Continued from 8/16/76)
D. Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -305 - `Marth Road from W. 78th St. North 445'
(Continued from 8/16/76)
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading requires offering of
'Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading should
be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Amendment of Platting and Zoning Ordinances to require placing of,signs
on land proposed to be platted, rezoned, etc.
B. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 811 -A79 -- Grimes House - Part of Lot 15,.Melvine-Grimes
Subdivision of Lots 8, 9 and 10, Grimes Homestead (4200 W. 44th St.)
R -1 Residential District to R -1 Heritage Preservation District
Z- 76 -10. (Continued from 8/16/76 and 9/4/76)
2. Ordinance No. 811 -A82 - Part of West Shore Drive in Lake Edina 3rd
Addition - R -1 Residence District to R -2 Multiple Residence District
Z -76 -12 (formerly Z- 76 -4).
3. Ordinance No. 811 -A83 - .Restricting one dwelling to a lot or plot in
the R -1 and R -2 Districts
4. Ordinance No. 811 -A84 - Ordinance amendment..raising.fees for rezonings
5. Ordinance No. 801 -A13 - Ordinance Amendment raising fees for subdivisions
6. Ordinance No. 801 -Al2 - Parkland dedication ordinance amendment
PUBLIC HEARING ON LOT DIVISION. Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators
heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable roll-
call vote to pass.
A. Lots 29 and 39, Warden Acres (5420 Benton Ave.) LD -76 -10 - (9/8/76)
(Continued from October 4, 1976)
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PRELIMINARY PLATS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presenta-
tion by Planning Department. Spectators heard. Action of.Councii by Resolution.
3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Ryan's Addition - Northeast corner of Limerick Lane & Brook Drive -.Lot 4,
Block 9, LaBuena Vista - .Z -76 -22 (9/8/76) (Continued from ,10 /4/76)
B. LaPepiniere Addition - Generally located South of..W. 70th St., West of
Cahill Road, North of .future Amundson Ave. Extension - S -76 -24 (9/29/76).
AWARD OF BIDS Tabulations and .recommendations by City Manager. Action''of
Council by Motion.
A. Cars and Trucks (Continued from 10/4/76)
B. Traffic Signal System - 50th & Halifax Ave. (Continued from 10/4/76)
C. Repairs.to Wells 415 and,418
COMMUNICATIONS
A. Petitions
1. Bror Road Grading & Graveling, Permanent Street Surfacing .& Curb,
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain
B. ° -' Robert P. Boblett Request for traffic signs at Blake Road and Vernon Ave.
C. Richard Griffith - Water Billing Policy
D. Ms. Doris.J. Maurer - Rainbow Management Division Proposal
E. Dr. Fred J. Miska - Woodbury.Company Zoning Request — 55th and France Ave.
October 18, 1976
Page Two
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
1. Set Hearing Date
a. Scott Lewis Addition
B. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of October 12, 1975 (Ord. No. 1401 -A4)
C. Notice of Claim - Eberhardt Company for Fountainwoods Apartments
D. Notice of Appeal - Assessment of SS -319, SS -320, WM -290 and ST.S -142
E. Street Lighting Improvement No. L -16 - 100% Petition
F. Fire Department Personnel
G. Park Department Quotes
H. Second Amended Declaration - Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition
I. Public Safety Reconnaisance Implementation
J. County Emergency Medical Services Council
K. Federal Public Works Grants Application
L. News Letter
M. Manager's Absence
N. Post Agenda and Manager's Miscellaneous Items
I. Suburban Health
2. HECO - New Agreement
3. Grandview Cemetery
VIII. ORDINANCES First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass Second Reading. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if
Second Reading should be waived.
A. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No.
2. Ordinance No.
3. Ordinance No.
4. Ordinance No.
are Subdivide
5. Ordinance No.
402 -A3
431 -A2
1101 -A6
801 -A14
d and Ex
1111 -A4
- Waiver of Sewer & Water Connection Requirements
- Connection to Sanitary Sewer and Water Systems
- Charges for Connection to Sanitary Sewer System
- Payment of Connection Charges when R -2 Lots
fisting Townhouses Platted or Subdivided
- Payment of Connection Charges for Connection
to Water System
B. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 112 -A2 - Council Salaries
IX. RESOLUTIONS
A. Regional Government in Minnesota
B. MSA Off System Expenditures - York Ave.
C. Revoke York Ave. from MSH System
X. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
XI. FINANCE
A. Cancellation of H.R.A. Levy
B. Claims paid. Motion of seconded by for payment
of the following claims as per Pre -List: General Fund, $200,310..99;
Park Fund, $3,940.31; Park Construction, $3,302.98; Pool Fund, $1,049.43;
Golf Fund, $9,009.18; Arena, $3,343.38; Gun, $528.19; Water, $26,220.90;
Sewer, $63,667.92; Liquor Fund, $67,587.94; Construction Fund, $48,848.86;
Total, $527,710.08
It
i
0-1 P-17M.- 14, @ SV
City' of �d1na
4601 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 57424
927 -8861
Dear Resident:
The Edina Traffic Safety Committee on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, at
9:00 A.M., City Hall Conference Room, will evaluate the results of the
traffic diverter located at the Mavelle Drive- Lynmar Lane intersection.
The Traffic Safety Committee will
Council on whether to permanently
it.
make a recommendation to the City
install the traffic diverter or remove
The Edina City Council will consider the Committee recommendation on
Monday, October 18, 1976, at 7:00 P.M., City Hall Council Chambers.
A short memorandum is attached to this informational notice to briefly
explain the background on this traffic diverter and a map showing compara-
tive 24 -hour traffic volumes at various locations before and after the
traffic diverter installation.
If you have further questions or comments on this issue,-please contact
me at City Hall or call 927 -8861, Ext. 59.
Fran Hoffman'
Assistant City Engineer
Traffic & Transportation
Attachments
ri
JI
ri /Hr 'y' •s,: ,
I.. e 4. ^F4 Hi` (o
N , j; W A .� j » _7,A I 01 .. �; ti-. _ ,�, r n t`1 c' • / f .
J7.;.r: SI:Til rLne.
4. O A F
64 84 i 3719) 60
0: dl vi r I d� is t.
HEATHERTON Q W '`
� 15Zof E'� 6 �4
o ^-,- to
L o•. O I' N W+ li vl
0
•J
4 "Q84.11
-4p 03
0 '60
O
BRISTOL-9 N o\ N 1I' Q i O I O
�, co O , � I .0
0-4 t39 89 .9¢ �'� o�r� .. i 94
YO I• t1i 7 J� v n y LA
� , 0 •�� �� �g � W fD
° o
o C
\n ;O N o N e `)�\ � LANE W
_ oji'•
r LY IU �f� A O �" r �,� 'y , 'J , OC r N
Li4oj.41 ®r E,, `� •,�; "0 � °��� :. =S �: >�. `'� 968
0.
S cc• p� ~p t p� Q
So 0� jtV+ ° i t a1^: r j irl - t'i 1 it T
® r8 � R"ryr •C'�i,. -L ..`• _I.JV►.•!.I ,J A4 Cl 41 r%I�ITION
�' �:` q `: 4" 5`;;�``�• mac,,_ ;:` �` 3 °C7 tOob
O{ N1 �V` 4M1e'`n Jas yo.aZa r�• aOSANDELL ROADO,
�V , � w � v '' • .*'r' a "SAN DELL
11 130
bo
187, 16
n
. S 0.
MEMORANDUM
As you are aware, a traffic diverter has been in place at the Mavelle
Drive - Lynmar Lane intersection for the past six months. This installation
has been in a temporary status and is now under consideration for perma-
nent installation.
The history on this traffic diverter is as follows:
Background
As Yorktown has continued to develop in recent years, traffic circulation
problems developed on some of the residential streets. Residents of
Lynmar Lane expressed their concern in a letter to Mayor Van Valkenburg
dated October 27, 1975.
Study Process
The City staff evaluated the area to determine if a feasible traffic
re- circulation plan could be developed using the evaluation criteria
attached. The Edina Traffic Safety Committee considered several alterna-
tives and concluded that the most effective device is the present
installation. It was felt that the diverter would reduce through
traffic, and decrease noise pollution, safety hazards, and litter that
is associated with heavier traffic.
Evaluation Criteria
The criteria used in evaluating the alternatives are described
below:
Service Criteria
1. Residential Accessibility - the ability of
the neighborhood residents to access the
surrounding arterial and collector streets.
2. Pedestrian Safety - the ability for pedestrians
to circulate .s.afely within the neighborhood.
3. Emergency Vehicle- Access - the ability for all
emergency vehicles to access all development
within the neighborhood.
4. Local /Collector Street Relationship - the
attainment of an effective relationship between
local streets and collector streets.
Environmental Criteria
1. Lane Vse Impact - the ability of the system
to complement existing land use patterns.
2. Traffic Volume Impact - the ability of the
plan to minimize the number of vehicles passing
the residential land uses.
TABULATION OF BIDS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
REPAIRS TO WELL NO, 15
REPAIRS TO WELL NO, 18
BIDS OPENED OCTOBER 15, 1976
BIDDER
BID
Well No. 15
Well No. 18
Keys Well Drilling Co.
8,510.00
$6,430.00
Layne Minnesota Co.
$11,106.90
$8,300.00
Ber erson- Caswell, Inc.
$12,846.00
$8,100.00
McCarthy Well Co.
$16,754.00.
8
152.00
u
i
Recommend award to Keys Well Drilling Company for both wells.
Note: These bids are based on estimated time and repair item quantities.
Actual cost of work could vary considerably from above figures.
"i _ ,1
MEMO
TO: Warren Hyde
Mayor and.Council
FROM: Thomas Melena
DATE: October 15, 1976
SUBJECT: POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS VEHICLE_ PURCHASES
On October 4, 1976, bids were taken for various City vehicles (bid list.is
attached with low bids asterisked).. Since determinations on department budgets
have now been made for 1977, both the Fire and Police Departments are now
requesting these vehicles.
Fire Department - one 3/4 ton, 4 wheel drive pickup - low bid Freeway Ford
with a Ford 250 pickup at $4,759.00 ($8,500 was.budgeted).
Police Department - as requested in the budget, 8 squad cars. The general
feeling in the police community is one of apprehension toward the compact
squad cars; however, the Edinalblice Department would still like to request
one compact so that we ourselves could determine the,positive or negative
aspects.of this vehicle. It is recommended that the remainder continue at
present to be intermediate squad cars. Therefore,
1 compact squad car - low bid is North Star Dodge, with the Aspen (old Dart)
at $5,080.06 each.
7 intermediate squad cars - low bid is North Star Dodge, with the Dodge
Monaco at $5,121.05 each (or $35,847.35 for 7).
Also as specified in the budget, the Police Chief's replacement vehicle,
an intermediate sedan, Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Not requested in the budget, but brought to light by the management study
and addressed to the Council during budget hearings, is the replacement and
addition of one car.to the Detective Division. At present the Detective
Division has 4 vehicles, however, if the emphasis for this Division is to
daytime work, then vehicles must be provided to cover all officers. There-
fore, they are requesting a total of 6 vehicles. The people involved would
be: 4 detectives, 1 police - school liaison officer,-,2 sergeants and " chief
detective, or a total of 8 people working all in the same time span, 9'a.m.
to 9 P.M. The vehicles requested are:
1 sub - compact - a Ford Pinto for the police - school liaison officer, from
Freeway Ford at $4,179.
3 compacts - Ford Mavericks from Freeway Ford at $4,386 each.
1 intermediate - Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Lastly, the Department is requesting a patrol captain, shift:supervis6r (It. - ?),
chief detective vehicle, in this case, an intermediate sedan from North Star.
Dodge at $4,707.90. This then means the following total - purchases: 8 squad
cars, 1 chief's car, 6 detective cars.
All Police Department vehicles would be paid for from 1% monies, total
initial cost is $72,388.11. Approximate trade -in va.lue of vehicles.concerned
would be $24,000, leaving a total actual cost of $48,388.11. With.a fleet
rotation program the individual department will then purchase the used
detective cars for a pre -set amount.which were already budgeted for, and
thereby not requiring the City to purchase any other automobiles other than
the Police Department fleet.
On Monday, October 4, 1976, at 11:00 a.m. bids were received for various
City vehicles. Bids are as follows:
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with an asterisk ( *).
U a-- °-( / 7 %
U 3 Se'
SUPERIOR
NORTH STAR
FREEWAY
FORD
DODGE
FORD
Sub- com'p���
N. B
N B
•_�- '' -'�0 = (Pinto)
Co
4 , 6 7 L 38
r-4 -, 386. -0.0* (haver i ck)
Intermediate Sedan
N.B.
1151461
4,724.00
Compact Squad
N.B.
-`
N.B.
Intermediate Squad
N.B.
) 5,214.00
Station Wagon
N.B.
5,544.73 *(Monaco)
N.B.
Trail Station Wagon
N.B.
61267.88 *(Ramcharger)N.B.
12 Passenger Van
6,944.00
7,051.43
6,813.00*
3/4 Ton Van
5,452.00
N.B.
5,349.00*
1/2 Ton Pickup
4,622.00
4,271.70*
4,472.00
3/4 Ton Pickup
4,953.00
5,056.77
4,759.00*
3/4 Ton Crew Cab Pickup
5,621.00
5,402.13
5,299.00*
'
10,000 GVW Truck w /Dump
A
N.B.
9,862.88*
N.B.
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with an asterisk ( *).
U a-- °-( / 7 %
U 3 Se'
170
FROM:
DATE:
Warren Hyde
Mayor and.Council
Thomas Melena
October 15, 1976
MEMO
SUBJECT: POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS VEHICLE. PURCHASES
On October:.4, 1976, bids were taken for various City vehicles (bid list is
attached with low bids asterisked). Since determinations on department budgets
have now been made for 1977, both the Fire and Police Departments are now
requesting these vehicles.
Fire Department - one 3/4 ton, 4 wheel drive pickup - low bid Freeway Ford
with a Ford 250 pickup at $4,759.00 ($8,500 was budgeted).
Police Department - as requested in the - budget, 8 squad cars. The general
fee ling in the police community is one of apprehension toward the compact
squad cars; however, the Edinaiblice Department would still like to request
one compact so that we ourselves could determine the positive or negative
aspects of .this vehicle. It is recommended that the remainder continue at
present to be intermediate squad cars. Therefore,
1 compact squad car - low bid is North Star.Dodge, with the Aspen (old Dart)
at $5,080.06 each.
7 intermediate squad cars - low bid is North Star Dodge, with the Dodge
Monaco at $5,121.05 each (or $35,847.35 for 7).
Also as specified in the budget, the Police Chief's replacement vehicle,
an intermediate sedan, Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Not requested in the budget, but brought to light by the management study
and addressed to the Council during budget hearings, is the replacement and
addition.of one car to the Detective Division. At present the Detective
Division has 4 vehicles, however, if the emphasis for this Division is to
daytime work, then vehicles must be provided to cover all officers. There -
fore, they are requesting a total of 6 vehicles. The people involved would
be: 4 detectives, 1 police- schogl liaison officer,:2 sergeants and ' chief
detective, or a total of 8 people working all in the same time span, 9 a.m.
to 9 P.M. The vehicles requested are:
I sub- compact - a Ford Pinto for the police- school liaison officer, from
Freeway Ford at $4,179.
3 compacts Ford Mavericks from Freeway Ford at $4,386 each.
1 intermediate - Dodge Monaco from North Star,.Dodge at $4,707.90.
Lastly, the Department is requesting a patrol captain, shif.t,supe,rvis6r (It. - ?))
chief detective vehicle, in this case, an intermediate sedan from North Star
Dodge at $4,707.90. This then means the following total purchases: 8 squad
cars, 1 chief's car, 6 detective cars.
All Police Department vehicles would be paid for from 1% monies, total
initial cost is $72,388.11. Approximate trade -in value of vehicles concerned
would be $24,000, leaving a total actual cost of $48,388.11. With a fleet
rotation program the individual department will then purchase the used
detective cars for a pre -set amount.which were already budgeted for, and
thereby not requiring the City to purchase any other automobiles other than
the Police Department fleet.
On Monday,.October 4, 1976, at 11:00 a.m. bids were received for various
City vehicles. Bids are as follows:
SUPERIOR
FORD
Sub - compact Sedan
$ N.B.
Compact Sedan
N.B
Intermediate Sedan
N.B.
Compact Squad
N.B.
Intermediate Squad
N.B.
Station Wagon
N.B.
Trail Station Wagon
N.B.
12 Passenger Van
6,944.00
3/4 Ton Van
5,452.00
1/2 Ton Pickup
4,622.00
3/4 Ton Pickup
4,953.00
3/4 Ton Crew Cab Pickup
5,621.00
3/4 Ton 4 Wh /Dr Pickup
5,752.00
10,000 GVW Truck w /Dump
N.B.
NORTH STAR FREEWAY
DODGE FORD
$ N.B. $ 4,179-00* (Pinto)
4,678.38 4,386.00* (maverick)
4,707.90 (Monaco) 4,724.00
5,o80.06`(Aspen) N.B.
5,121.05 *(Monaco) 5,214.00
5,544.73 *(Monaco) N.B.
6,267.88* (Ramcharger)N.B.
7,051.43 6,813.00*
N.B. 5 349.00*
4,271.70* 4,472.00
5,056.77 4,759.00*
5,402.13 5,299.00*
5,527.63* 5,528.00
9,862.88* N.B.
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with an asterisk N.
Cam, s • i Itr_/ 3 -7 14
MEMO
TO: Warren Hyde'
Mayor and Council
FROM: Thomas Melena
DATE: October 15, 1976
SUBJECT: POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS VEHICLE. PURCHASES
On .October 4,.,- 1976, bids were taken for various City vehicles (bid list is
attached with low bids asterisked). Since determinations on department budgets
have now been made for 1977, both the Fire and Police Departments are now
requesting these vehicles.
Fire Department - one 3/4 ton, 4 wheel drive pickup - low bid Freeway Fard
with a Ford 250 pickup at $4,759.00 ($8,500 was budgeted).
Police Department - as requested in the budget, 8 squad cars. The general
feeling in the police community is one of apprehension toward the compact
squad cars; however, the Edinafblice Department would still like to request
one compact so that we ourselves could determine the positive or negative
aspects of this vehicle. It is recommended that the remainder continue at
present to be intermediate squad cars. Therefore,
1 compact squad car - low bid is North Star Dodge, with the Aspen (old Dart).
at $5,080.06 each.
7 intermediate squad cars - low bid is North Star Dodge, with the Dodge
Monaco at $5,121.05 each (or $35,847.35 for 7).
Also as specified in the budget, the Police Chief's replacement vehicle,
an intermediate sedan, Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Not requested in the budget, but brought to light by. the management study
.and addressed to the Council during budget hearings, is the replacement and
addition of one car to the Detective Division. At present the Detective
Division has 4 vehicles, however, if the emphasis for this Division is to
daytime work, then vehicles must be provided to cover all officers. There-
fore, they are requesting a total of 6 vehicles. The people involved would
be: 4 detectives, 1 police - school liaison officer, 2 sergeants and chief
detective, or a total of 8 people working all in the same time span, 9 a.m.
to 9 p.m.. The vehicles requested are:
I sub- compact - a Ford Pinto for the police - school liaison officer, from
Freeway Ford at $4,179.
3 compacts - Ford Mavericks from Freeway Ford at $4,386 each.
1 intermediate - Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Lastly, the Department is requesting a patrol captain, shift:supe,rvis6r (It. - ?),
chief detective vehicle, in this case, an intermediate sedan from North Star
Dodge at $4,707.90. This then means the following total purchases: 8 squad
cars, 1 chief's car, 6 detective cars.
All Police Department vehicles would be paid for from 1% monies, total
initial cost is $72,388.11. Approximate trade -in value of vehicles concerned
would be.$24,000, leaving a total actual cost of $48,388.11. With a fleet
rotation program the individual department will then purchase the used
detective cars for a pre -set amount.which were already budgeted for, and
thereby not requiring the City to purchase any other automobiles other than
the Police Department fleet.
f�
On Monday, October 4, 1976, at 11:00 a.m. bids were received for various
City vehicles. Bids are as follows:
NORTH STAR FREEWAY
DODGE FORD
$ N.B. $ 4,179.00 *(Pinto)
4,678.38 4,386.00 *(Maverick)
4, 707.90.*, (Monaco) 4,724.00
5,080.06* (Aspen) N.B.
5,121..05* (Monaco) 5,214.00
5,544.73- (Monaco) N.B.
6,267.88 *(Ramcharger)N.B.
7,051.43 6,813.00*
N.B. 5,349.00*
4,271.70* 4,472.00
5,056.77 4,759.00*
5,402.13 5,299..00*
5,527.63 *. 5,528.00
9,862.88* N.B.
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with an asterisk ( *).
SUPERIOR
FORD
Sub - compact. Sedan
$ N.B.
Compact Sedan
N.B
Intermediate Sedan
N.B.
Compact Squad
N.B.
Intermediate Squad
N.B.
Station Wagon
N.B.
Trail Station Wagon
N.B.
12 Passenger Van
.6 „944.00
3/4 Ton Van
5,452.00
1/2 Ton Pickup
4.,622.00
3 /4.Ton Pickup
4 „953.00
3/4 Ton Crew Cab Pickup
5„621.00
3/4 Ton 4 Wh /Dr Pickup
5,752.00
10,000 GVW Truck w /Dump
N.B.
NORTH STAR FREEWAY
DODGE FORD
$ N.B. $ 4,179.00 *(Pinto)
4,678.38 4,386.00 *(Maverick)
4, 707.90.*, (Monaco) 4,724.00
5,080.06* (Aspen) N.B.
5,121..05* (Monaco) 5,214.00
5,544.73- (Monaco) N.B.
6,267.88 *(Ramcharger)N.B.
7,051.43 6,813.00*
N.B. 5,349.00*
4,271.70* 4,472.00
5,056.77 4,759.00*
5,402.13 5,299..00*
5,527.63 *. 5,528.00
9,862.88* N.B.
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with an asterisk ( *).
l
MEMO
TO: Warren Hyde
Mayor and Council
FROM: Thomas Melena
DATE: October 15, 1976
SUBJECT: POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS VEHICLE. PURCHASES
On October 4, 1976,, bids were taken for various City vehicles ''('bid list is
attached with low bids asterisked). Since determinations on department budgets
have now been made for 1977, both the Fire and Police Departments are now
requesting these vehicles.
Fire Department - one 3/4 ton, 4 wheel drive pickup - low bid Freeway Ford
with a Ford 250 pickup at-$4,759.00,($8,,500 was budgeted).
Police.Department - as requested in the budget, 8 squad,cars. The general
feeling in the police community is one of apprehension toward the compact
squad cars; however, the Edinaiblice Department would still like to request
one compact so that we ourselves could determine the positive or negative
aspects of this vehicle. It is recommended that the remainder continue at
present to be intermediate squad cars. Therefore,
1 compact squad car - low bid is North Star.Dodge, with the Aspen (old Dart)
at $5,080.06 each.
7 intermediate squad cars - tow bid is North Star Dodge, with the Dodge
Monaco at $5,121.05 each (or'$35,847.35 for 7).
Also as specified in the budget, the Police Chief's replacement vehicle,
an intermediate sedan, Dodge - Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Not requested in the budget, but brought to light by the management study
and addressed to the Council during budget hearings; is the replacement and
addition of one car to the Detective Division. At present the Detective
Division has .4 vehicles, however, if the emphasis for this Division is to
daytime work, then vehicles must be provided to cover all officers. There -
.fore, they are requesting a total of 6 vehicles. The people involved would
be: 4 detectives, 1 police- sc;hogl liaison officer';- ,2..sergeants and chief
detective, or a total of 8 People working all in the same time span, 9 a.m.
to 9 p.m. The vehicles requested are:
1 sub - compact - a Ford Pinto for the police - school liaison officer, from
Freeway Ford at $4,179.
3 compacts - Ford Mavericks from Freeway Ford at.$4,386 each.
1 intermediate - Dodge Monaco from North Star Dodge at $4,707.90.
Lastly, the Department is requesting a patrol captain, shift, supervisor (It.- ?)I
chief detective vehicle, in this case, an intermediate sedan from North Star
Dodge at $4,707.90. This then means the following total purchases: 8 squad
cars, 1 chief's car, 6 detective cars.
All Police Department vehicles would be paid for from 1% monies, total
initial cost is $72,388.11. 'Approximate trade -in value of vehicles concerned
would be $24,000, leaving a total actual cost of $48,388.11. With a fleet
rotation program the individual department will then purchase the used
detective cars for a pre- set.amount.which were already budgeted for, and
thereby not requiring the City to purchase any other automobiles other than
the Police Department fleet.
i
..On Monday, October 4, 1976,
at 11:00 a.m.
bids were received for various
City vehicles. Bids are as
follows:
SUPERIOR
NORTH STAR
FREEWAY
FORD
DODGE
FORD
Sub- compact Sedan
$ N.B.
$ N.B.
$ 4,179.00* (Pinto)
Compact Sedan
N.B
4,678.38
4,386.00 *(Maverick)
Intermediate Sedan
N.B.
4,707.90 *(Monaco)
4,724.00
Compact Squad
N.B.
5,080.,06* (Aspen),
N.B.
Intermediate Squad
N.B.
5,121.05*(Monaco)
5,214.00
Station Wagon
N.B.
5,544-73*. (Monaco)
N.B.
Trail Station Wagon
N.B.
6,267.88 *(Ramcharger)N.B.
12 Passenger Van
6,944.00
7,051.43
6,813.00*
3 /4.Ton Van
5,452.00
N.B.
5,349.00*
1/2 Ton Pickup
4,622.00
4,271.70*
4,472.00
3/4 Ton Pickup
4,953.00
5,056.77
4,759.00`
3/4 Ton Crew Cab Pickup
5,621.00
5,402.13
5,299.00*
3/4 Ton 4 Wh /Dr Pickup
5,752.00
5,527.63*
5,528.00
10,000 GVW Truck w /Dump
N.B.
9,862.88*
N.B.
would recommend bid award to the firms and items marked with.an asterisk (*
Nu- �G_L_6 uSA�E Gam¢
sv
Y- R-e-
? vo
%• ra
v
3 ,- - V7•&�) � 113 0 -ri I'D
'ZIA
M-
ROBERT BOBLETT ASSOCIATES, INC.
1 INDUSTRIAL REAL ESTATE
1007 M I DWEST PLAZA EAST • (612)335-6515
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
The Industrial
Real Estate Professimlals
ROBERT P. BOBLETT, B.I.R.
PRESIDENT
CLARK A. OILMAN
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
SALESMAN AFFILIATE MEMBER. S.I.R.
HARRY J. MILLER '
VICE PRESIDENT
SALESMAN AFFILIATE MEMBER, S.I.R.
SHERMAN P. MALKERSON
ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT
ROBERT P. SOBLETT, JR.
ASSISTANT SECRETARY - TREASURER
October 6, 1976
The Honorable City Council
City of Edina
Edina City Hall
Edina, Minnesota
Gentlemen:
Respectfully request consideration of some signing at the intersection of Blake
Road and Vernon Avenue. Perhaps a four -way stop sign there would be productive.
It is most difficult to enter Vernon from Blake Road southbound during the early
hours of the morning and the dinner hour in the evening. Trust you can aid this
intersection in some constructive manner.
Yours very truly,
ROBERT BOBLETT ASSOCIATES, INC.
k4�r�,v1� �•
Robert P. Boblett
President
RPB
INDIVIDUAL MEMBERSHIPS. SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL REALTORS
TABULATION OF BIDS
CITY OF EDINA, i�i�V'i�LSOTA
ONE FULL TRAFFIC - ACTUATED
TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENT NO. TS -2
CONTRACT NO. 76 -7
BIDS OPENED OCTOBER 1, 1976
LOCATION: 50TH & HALIFAX
BIDDER
BID
Collins Electric
$ 36,760
Hoffman Electric
37,700
Batzli Electric
38,850
Electric Repair and Construction
39,448
Egan -McKay
40,150*
Commonwealth Electric
41,750
Engineer's Estimate _
$ 42,000
*No bid bond
Ec -put i RUN lvl.lam I -rq-� ofi
lot division
REQUEST NUMBER:
LD -76 -10
LOCATION: N. of Benton, W. of MN &S
Railroad Tracks.
REQUEST: Two lot single family divi-
sion.
gjllnRe Manning debifirtmsnt vi11age_of elfino
EDINA PLANNING C0ILIMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 8, 1976
LD -76 -10 Joe Songstad. 5420 Benton Avenue. Lots 29 and 30, Warden Acres.
Refer to: attached survey and graphic
The proponent is-requesting to subdivide their existing ownership, which is
lot 30 and a portion of lot 29, Warden Acres. The Warden Acres lots were
originally 150 feet wide, but most every lot has been divided into two
75 foot wide lots running almost 300 feet deep.
Attached also is a graphic which was drawn several years ago which showed
that in the future a possible Oak Drive extension could be created to.service
the rear portions of these properties. Part of that Oak Drive has already
been dedicated, and other land owners have indicated a willingness to make
.that dedication when their properties are subdivided. Thus, it seems
possible that Oak Drive will someday be extended. The proponents "are
requesting to subdivide the property into two lots; one lot would be 80
feet wide and the other lot would be 86 feet wide.
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed division
contingent on the dedication by easement of a 25 foot strip of land along
the north side of Lot 30 for public road purposes.
LD -76 -10 Joe Songstad. 5420 Benton Avenue. Lots 29 and 30, Warden Acres.
®�
Mr. Luce noted that most of the original Warden Acres lots have -.been
M(freplatted, and right of way was dedicated last year in connection with the Warden
Acres- Austin•,Replat for the possible future extension of Oak Lane,along the rear of
the property in question and adjacent lots to the north and west. The proponent
presently owns Lot 30 and the West 20 feet of Lot 29. He is requesting to redivide
that land into two single family lots; one lot would be 80' X 299'. and the other lot
would be 85.98' X 299'. A house presently exists on the..smaller proposed lot.
Approval was recommended contingent on: 1. the dedication of a 25 foot
strip along the north boundary of the entire property for public road purposes; and
2..payment.of a parkland dedication fee in the amount of $600..00.
Mr. Songstad, the proponent, was present.
Mr. Kremer moved the requested lot division be approved provided the
proponent dedicates a 25 foot strip of land along the rear lot line for a possible
future road and $600 to satisfy his parkland dedication obligation for the additional.
lot being created. Mr. G. Johnson seconded the motion.. All voted aye. Motion
carried.
ti
5.18
Z_ 0 77
N%e-Al
0 OENdrti 5 WLW 6AF,
I hereby certify that thiE is -a
true-and correct representation
of a survey of the hounda-.ies of
Lot 30, except the East 5S.48
feet - thereof, WARDEN ACRE ,-
Hennepin County,; Minnesot: , and
of the location � I
of all buildings
thereon, and all visible en-
croachments, if any, from or on
said land.. Surveyed "by me -this
day 1976,
_91
NI
0
0% Ro t B. Neredith, .inn.
,�G r
1"0
Z
�; 8 61
f '
Subdivision No. L. ° 76 -10
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: LAs 'gL er +30 Wo "daf+ AG e
LAND SIZE:. 0 LAND VALUE: f Z C C �)
�By: J��-.� Date:
bb
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
A. grant an easement over part of the land
n B. dedicate % of the land
C. donate $ �O ° d - 00 as a fee in lieu of land
as a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or 'intensity may be used for the first '5% of
land dedicated)
[] 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
[� 2.. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
p3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
[] 4. If property is necessary.for storm water holding and will be dredged
or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
[] 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic
value.
B. Cash Required
K-1. In all other instances than above.
❑ 2•
LOCATION' MAP---1-01
a
a:
J$ T,4 sT
CAHILL
ELEM SCHO I
subdiVisi�rt
REQUEST NUMBER: S-76-24
S of W. 70th Street, W of
LOCATION: Cahill- Rd., N o-f future Amundsoi
Ave. extended
REQUEST:. one lot plat
y.jUame i4annins villagc of edina
t
EDINA PLANNING CO;MISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 29, 1976'
S -76 -24 LaPepiniere Addition. Generally located south of [hest 70th Street
and west of Cahill Road, north of the future Amundson Avenue
extension.
Refer to: Attached copy of plat, p 'klaad dedle tlen Veporz and
area map.
The proponents are requesting to subdivide this 3/4 acre site into one lot for
mortgage purposes. In connection with this subdivision, they would be
dedicating a portion of property necessary for the future extension of Amundson
Avenue. Although the proponent is not rezoning this property, our ordinance
states that a parkland dedication must be submitted whenever property is
subdivided.
Recommendation: The property is served with all of the necessary utilities
for' development and the applicant is making the proper dedications for road
and parkland purposes. The staff therefore recommends approval of the prgposed
plat, contingent on the submission of a parkland dedication fee,�
(The subdivision dedication report will'be available
at the meeting.)
GL: In
9/23/76
r
The North 163.5 feet of the East-308 feet of the North 10 acres of
the South 19� acres of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 8, Township 116, Range 21.
Subject to. road easeriert over the South 30 feet thereof. as shown
in deed Doc. No. 113£3314; Files of Registrar of Titles.
i
_.V\ - - - -• _25.0
� ;33:0
i
I %Z 5T
I - ST. FR. ST�1CC O Na•
GARAGE /
5
�^-
2750 Ufi /ify t'�]i17 Ea3eme '
% C 27 ��
• . . L ocq 7- /oN Nlg�
T Or% ovrt.or
t 0 �..a.t ?A Q � • r
s: App Q I al.
3 r = ;
r II O
_..16ii�- 151x-- f` t.� �- ..
'
1700) a�0o f
( 3000 ' (1900 ) •. a J .,� f o., �� G
6 - G! ✓rrh di S }.Oa /rtf `1' svA00/ .7. :Srr..r, .. v,>• (yJ S o t':••'
?11.4
4-511— — — — — 191. r. •i• f f;r� \��= •{- Q]•lr.
qo $ 221 i ILWI "I •
all 4 •rtfsfl .'•!r %0 rh[V�� l;'y • !' '.. �y`. ••,y
Ld
"iER ACE
rs3s1 I �z:b� 28 /84 7 AMUNDSON 7 nr r 1 •��
i 85,9r N�1.
0500; ' ° s »•sc3o -„ W
Irtt! off
1
A Q
w
0/.00) °rt C:c 5526636
580 -7:57
. si1`tlea 2 ;
° sc•nynr i• x
• - � tf9ffip = •r1f.7 j
dJ.1f " 667.34 1489'55 19 "E ;y c:a08 389.64:5•[ y -- 1
-
�"
64'00)
2--Z, 700 so.ff.:� •�
Nr b AY I •
co 847 7169055'19 -E Jilt �r F 11 0
.55'!5 -w 59c°4 _•� -C3342--
w. ; 100 - -337.8:- 589'453:1 - °v
z X
COO
-
• ® O
�D r
n S44137E Q?'oy,►6"
Q ay'J,.� J, •J''•v �9 J. 'Z
_ W
2 It
I 1 /J)
I 1
1
I I
h h I
� • 7h.s road c}�.-1,ty snd '
• Ir >vt.li O.Y. :71nq r• •:.
L /150
sr>ra at ✓' "...- -- - - - -- — 2443.f. Res
,-Orr of parcel ( /00)
4
hd3. 4137 "rt
F�
100
I � -
�•-
Q
d
O w a
kz
S
� �
'
55 °n
o
•2
mod®
a
Y w
N8 s•41 37-If
ry BLCCK I LOT
„'EDINA INTERCHA.NG
`1
CENTER SECOND ADD.
4
• w
Subdivision No. S -�4
-SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: L t
LAND SIZE: LAND VALUE: 3� OD
(By Date:
'
5 %
The developer of this subdivision has been required to P D fs
o�N
0 A. grant an easement over part of the land
(] B. dedicate % of the land
[� C. donate $ r> -0 .as a fee in lieu of land
-as a result of applying the following policy:
-A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of
land dedicated)
❑ 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
[l 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
p3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond,'or stream.
E] 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged
or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place.
[] 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic
value.
AM
B. Cash Required
K1. In all other instances than above.
❑ 2• ,
• 9 -29 -76 Planning Commission Minutes, Page 2
so vehicles would not have to be backed out onto Blake Road.
Mr.. Terry Jacobson, the architect, noted the graphics presented are not meant
to illustrate the actual house locations planned.; they :simply illustrate there is
sufficient buildable lot area to allow two houses and a common drive, with turn - around
space.
(Mr. G. Johnson arrived.)
Considerable discussion. followed regarding the amount of buildable lot area
and the traffic and visibility problems near the site. Mr. Hughes .then moved the
requested subdivision be denied in,. light of ...the .,existing.. and :p.otential .traffic
hazards, the traffic engineer's report, and.-the staff's negative. recommendation.
Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All v..oted aye _except.Mr. G. Johnson, who.,abstained.
Motion carried.
S -76 -24 LaPepiniere Addition.. Generally located south of West 70th Street
and west of`Cahil Road, north of the future Amundson Avenue extension.
Mr. Luce explained the proponent is requesting to plat the 3/4 acre site in
question into one lot for mortgage and tax purposes. The north half of the future
extension of Amundson Avenue and 'the west -half of Cahill Road would be dedicated to
the City as a result of the proposed platting. A $1500 parkland dedication fee will
also be required. Mr. Luce "noted -the `'property was'zoned R-,3 "Multiple Residential
District several years ago and. :utilities are ava'iliVle to serve the site should
future development occur. :He:sta.ted,hc has urged-.all''of. "the -property owners in this
area to join in a single plat so the land west of Amundson Avenue and south of Cahill
School can be acquired by the City via:a parkland - dedication from the plat.
Mr. Luce recommended the proposed plat be approved, contingent on the sub-
mission of a. parkland dedication :fee in the amount of $1500.00.
Discussion followed regarding future development of Amundson Avenue and the
remaining vacant properties in this area. In.reply to Mr. Hughes, Mr. Luce indicated
that approval of the proposed plat would not - preclude a single development on all
of the remaining vacant parcels.
Mrs. McDonald moved the ,preliminary plat of LaPepiniere Addition be .approved,
subject to submission of a .parkland dedication fee in lieu of land. Mr. G. Johnson
seconded the motion. All voted a.Ye. Motion carried-.
S -76 -23 Woodbury Park Townhomes First Addition. Generally .located at the
southeast corner of France Avenue and West 55th Street.
AND
Z -76 -13 Reese /Rova Associates (The Woodbury Company). Generally located at
southeast corner of France Avenue and West 55th Street. R -1 Single
Family Residence District and R -2 Multiple Family Residence District
to PRD -2 Planned' Residential District.
Mr. Luce stated the proponents are requesting a subdivision and rezoning to
PRD -2 to allow development of nine townhouse units on this property.. The westerly
portion of the site is presently zoned R- 2,�and the remainder is "zoned R =1. The
October. 21, 1976
Mr..Charles Dana
Mastor.& Mattson, Ltd.
315 Peavey Bldg.
Minneapolis, M11 55402
Dear Mr.' Dana:
..Enclosed as you requested is a certified copy of the resolution
adopted by the Edina City Council on October 18, 1976, as pertains
to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosure
ti
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Edina does hereby release Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition, according to the duly recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from the covenants and
restrictions set out in paragraph 5.c of the Declaration of
Restrictions and Protective Covenants filed as Document
No. 1033727, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as modified by the Amended Declaration
of Restrictions and Protective Covenants filed as Document
No. 1175306.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolution
shall not be effective unless and until there is delivered
to the City an amendment to said Declaration of Restrictions
and Protective Covenants, duly signed by the owner and all
claimants of an interest in said Lots 1 and 2, and in
recordable form, reimposing upon said Lots 1 and 2 the
following restrictions:
1. (i) The buildings on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, containing dwelling units may be
of varying heights comprising any combination of 3, 4, 5 or
6 stories.
(ii) Buildings, parking areas, driveways, and
other hard - surfaced, nonvegetative areas on the lot shall
not cover, in the aggregate, more than sixty (600) per cent
of the area of the lot.
2. The covenants and restrictions herein contained
may be released only by the City of Edina and may be released
as to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, by
the City of Edina at any time and from time to time by its
sole act. Any such release shall be done by resolution of
the Edina City Council and shall be effective only upon the
recording of such resolution in the same office in which
said Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective
Covenants has been recorded; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolutions
shall supercede those resolutions adopted April 19, 1976,
with respect to Lot 4, Block 6, Yorktown, now replatted as
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, and the
resolutions adopted September 20, 1976, as to Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
CITY OF EDINA )
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk
for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of Oct. 18 , 1976,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21 day
of October. , 1976.
U
City Clerk
-,L
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby terminate
its agreement for participation in the-Suburban Public Health
Nursing Service program as of January 1, 197 � '
ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1976. :.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HE14NEPIN) SS
-CITY OF EDINA- ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned.duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of October 18, 1976, and as recorded in the Minutes
of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of October, 1976. -
- City Clerk
October 22, 1976
Miss Hilda W. Boyle, Director.
Suburban ,Public Health Nureing',Service
8700 W. 36th St. West 201
St. Louis Park, MN 55426
Dear :Miss _Boyle:.
Enclosed herewith as we discussed by telephone is a copy of the
resolution adopted by the Edina City Council terminating the City
of Edina's participation in the Suburban Public Health Nursing
- .Service program.
Yours very truly,
City.Clerk
enclosure.
RESOLUTION
APPROPRIATION OF MUNICIPAL STATE -AID FUNDS
FOR SIDEWALK 117ORK CONSTRUCTED ON
MUNICIPAL STATE -AID STREET THAT
HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has expended $112,936.74 to construct
sidewalk on York Avenue South (Municipal State Aid Segment
120 - 155 -02) between W. 69th Street and W. 74th Street, and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County is in the process of designating York
Avenue South from W. 65th Street to W. 78th Street as C.S.A.H.
31, thereby removing it from the City of Edina Municipal State
Aid System;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State -Aid
Street Funds the amount of $112,936.74 to pay for this sidewalk
construction and request the Commissioner of Highways to approve
this authorization.
ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the above is a true and
correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the
Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, at a duly authorized
meeting thereof held on the 18th day of October, 1976, as shown
by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of October,
1976.
City Clerk
lCtlm,e17�
?
RESOLUTION REVOKING MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET
WHEREAS, it appears to the City Council of the City of Edina
that the road hereinafter described should be revoked as a
Municipal State Aid Street under the provisions of Minnesota
Laws:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Edina that the road described as follows, to -wit:
York Avenue from West 66th Street to West 78th Street
(All segments of Municipal State Aid Section 120 -155)
be, and hereby is, revoked as a Municipal State Aid Street of
said City, subject to the approval of the Commissioner of Highways
of the State of Minnesota; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized
and directed to forward two certified copies of this resolution
to the Commissioner of Highways for his consideration.
ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
regular meeting of October 18, 1976, and as recorded in the minutes
of said regular meeting.
Witness my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of October, 1976.
City Clerk
FRIDLEY
29,233
6,600
Ward- 4, 800
3
1
informal meeting
ELECTED OFFICIALS SALARY SURVEY
At
large- 5,400
GOLDEN VALLEY
4NNUAL SALARY
ANNUAL SALARY
REG. MTGS.
SPECIAL MEETINGS
ADDITIONAL
SECOND CLASS CITIES
POPULATION
OF MAYOR
COUNCILMEMBER
PER MONTH
....PER MONTH
COMPENSATION
BLAINE
20,568
$ 2,400
$ 2,100
2
2
BLOOMINGTON
81,970
5,700
4,650
4
2
BROOKLYN CENTER
35,173
4,860
3,120
2
2
2
BROOKLYN PARK
26,230
3,600
2,400
2
2 work meetings
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS
23,997
7,200
4,200
2
eeng m
mim?roox. t3
2
approximately
SOUTH ST. PAUL
25,016
3,000
1,800
per month.
2
COON RAPIDS.
30,505
3,600
Mrd- 3, 000
4
1
- New Hope salary
At
large- 3, 3 0 0
Mayor to $3,,600,
councilmembers
to
CRYSTAL
30,925
2,400
1,800
2
EDINA
44,046
3,900,
2,600
2
FRIDLEY
29,233
6,600
Ward- 4, 800
3
1
informal meeting
At
large- 5,400
GOLDEN VALLEY
24,246
2,400
1,800
2
MAPLEWOOD
25,186
3,600
2,700
2
2
approximately
MINNETONKA
35,776
3,600
2,400
2
NEW HOPE
23,180
2,700*
1,800*
2
RICHFIELD
47,231
5,400
4,020
2
2
HRA meetings $25 ea.NRA mtg.
ROSEVILLE
34,438
3,900
3,300
3
ST. LOUIS PARK
48,883
3,600
2,400
2
2
approximately
SOUTH ST. PAUL
25,016
3,000
1,800
2
2
informal mtgs. Mayor -$50 Exp.
WHITE BEAR LAKE
23,313
1,200
900
1
- New Hope salary
change: January
1, 1977
Mayor to $3,,600,
councilmembers
to
$2,600.
ANNUAL SALARY ANNUAL SALARY REG. MTGS. SPECIAL MEETINGS
THIRD CLASS CITIES POPULATION OF MAYOR COUNCILMEMBER PER MONTH PER 'MONTH'
ANOKA 13,298 $ 11800 $ 1,500 2
BURNSVILLE 19,940 2,400 1,800 2
COTTAGE GROVE 13,419 2,400 1,800 2 1 approximately,
plus 1 commission
meeting per mo.
ADDITIONAL
COMPENSATION
$20 ea. special
meeting
EAGAN
10,398
2,400
1,800
2
HASTINGS
12,195
720*
600*
2
HOPKINS
13,428
2,900
•2,400
2
INVER GROVE HGHTS.
12,148
960
720
3
MOUNDS VIEW
10,599
2,400
1,800
2
NEW BRIGHTON
19,507
3,000
2,400
2
NORTH ST. PAUL
11,950
1,800
1,200
2 1 approximately.
PLYMOUTH
18,077
5,400
3,600
3
SHOREVIEW
16,845
3,180
2,280
2 2 approximately
STILLWATER
10,191
2,700
1,800
2
WEST ST. PAUL
18,802
2,400
1,800
2
* - Hastings salary change January 1, 1977: Mayor, $1,800= Councilmembers, $1,200.
Y
.
-2-
. $- /
YOUTH APPRECIATION [TEED.
P R 0 C L A N A T I0N
WHEREAS, The vast majority of youth are concerned, knowledgeable
and responsible citizens, and
TIEEREAS, the accomplishments and achievements of these young
citizens deserve recognition and praise of their
elders, and
I'MERE,AS, Optimist International has for the past twenty -two
years promoted and conducted a program entitled
Youth Appreciation Week, which this year is to be
observed November 8 -14 , and
V-711EREAS, the citizens of
have indicated a desire to join with the Optimists in
expressing appreciation and approval of the contri-
butions of youth, I, therefore
proclaim November 8 -14, 1976, as Youth Appreciation
Meek in
By this action let it be known that we have faith in
the ability of today's youth as they assume responsible
roles in the future of mankind.
G-
M E M O R A N D U M
October 15, 1976
MEMO TO: Mr. Warren C. Hyde
Council Members
FROM: Rick Jacobson, Recreation Supervisor
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Resurfacing of tennis courts at Pamela and Cornelia School park.
The following are the three quotes received for the resurfacing of tennis courts.
at Pamela and Cornelia School park.
1. Action Courts Inc., 4785 Dodd Road, Eagan, M14 55123
Pamela Park - $2,610.00
Cornelia School Park - $2.300.00
,Lt q 10
2. Henry 0. Mikkelson Co., 20 W. 59th St., Mpls., MN 55419
Pamela Park - $3,900.00
Cornelia School Park - $3,900.00
-7 fo=a-
3• Carlson LaVine Inc., 2831 Aldrich So., Mpls., MN 55408
Pamela Park - 53,260.00
Cornelia School Park - $3,2� 60. 0
(o `5aa
Recommend award to Action Courts Inc. for above purchase price totaling $4,910.00
CA IM LSO VZ -r,71 ; Gig Q t N C.
GENERAL • CONTRACTORS
;1
2931 ALDRICI1 .417-NUK SOCTII ,, .1/I NE,t POLI S, 111 �'.t ESOT.4 15408
e C, E11ty
TF:I.F.NIO\'F,: 82; -2::31
October 14, 197E
City of Edina
4801 !Jest 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Attn:. `:r. Rick. Jacobson
Dear Mr. Jacobson:
As per your request we are breaking -down the cost for the
two proposals dated October 7, 1976.
Our proposal for Pamel Park, Edina will stand as submitted
for $3,260.00.
The proposal for Highland Park will be the sane as Pamela Park
except for the sum of $3,630.00 and if the cracking is still
coming through in the Spring we would suggest covering the entire
court with tennis court cloth for the additional sum of 51,080.00.
Your request for a quote on Corneila School will be the same as
our proposal for Pamela Park except for the large cracks which
might have to be covered with tennis court cloth in the Spring
which would be an additional $100.00. Also, we have not included
any concrete work.
e
Thank you for your inquiry and hope we maybe of service to you.
Sincerely,
Q�
Erick LaVine
EL:jb
a
Henry O. Mikkelson Company
so wear 59rH sris8r
GENERAL CONTRACTOR MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. 53149 �a i
, .
PHONE: a61 -22s3
October 12, 1976
Mr Rick Jacobson
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Resurfacing Tennis Courts at Highlands, Pamala & Cornelia Parka
Dear Rick:
We propose to furnish and install the following items at each of the
above mentioned parks:
1 - Clean court surface of dirt & debris.
2 - Fill major cracks with crack filler material.
3 - Apply fiberglass material to court surface and embed with tennis
court binder material.
4 - Install Laykold G-6 surface or equivalent type surface. We will
roll between coats with one (1) ton roller.
5 - Install white playing lines for singles and doubles play.
We will provide the above mentioned resurfacing work for the sum of:
Three Thousand and Nine Hundred Dollars ($31,900.00) each park site.
If you were to award all three sites the total cost could be $11,700.00.
including Minnesota SALes Tax.
If the weather continues to be good, I would .think the majority of the
resurfacing work could be accomplished this all. Please let me know
as soon as possible if you would like us to this work. Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
Henry 0. Mikkelson Co
Chuck Mikkelson
CM/mc
.y
4785 DODD RD. • EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 • PHONE 454 -3652
October 13, '976
Pick Jacobson
Perk APCr=atior " =•pt.
1'`'01 :'. 50th �'t,
,4i n-- , `"inn. 55421:
r. �c.,bs„n: R?; ?rk rt '12nd "n:' ^orn•-'.�us
ri v.
Th^n!r ,ou r (,r the -�`rrt }.; :... to 1;1,' on th. proArct at the
+ +I. Kfntt ^r r'.�^'�. '•'�, n-"p thr !'n'lot.;in surfrPstions:
7hP courts shnu'r' br n'p,npe of a''_ surface dirt r
court ^-ntnr° , - nd loose tpnni s
s. • 1 er• ks show lr' bQ clranrd out any? fi l.1 v e +.•;i.th tPnni s
court r= surfacer.
c' rr� 'b'ths ov- r 1 /Rth inch r'epn should bP fi_11 rd with rr surf -
ac: r. '711er• tpnt:i.s court ehruld bP surf,;cr(1 t':ith Laykol-' G -4, or an
approveri ^ual.
Coloring sh; ll be of -•our choi en. ' !nine 1.111 be pai nt-d follow-
ing U.I. TFnn;s court ?•track nlAr's Assnc. spec.
'ork will b- st,nrtPr' yet this year if the 1-Mather allows.
call t?o the above ;;,,r for the sum of ' 2,?00_pp-
PlP;,se return siene(i copy
r; /bh
AL . HA ?P PRES.
ction Coy is Tnc
A,
• ti•
-1, . � r .4
4785 DODD RD. • EAGAN, MINNESOTA 55123 • PHONE 454-3652
FiCl,7 J;cobson
Rncrentlon Furf
LIP01 '--:. rOth St.
Frilnp, , Inn.
October S, 19 76
7: : Fameln !`--rk.
0
frurr' tl:eszn courts Inave -1 st.r%ctur�I. rr-ick ?cross ent'
coy rt. 7h-s will I-P, cut out to 1,71rit'-1 of 2 fl-et,
t,hr• sull-lcl;nse nr.•' thirzn t to ex s�l ng I-ei ght s
c(,!.lrts.
rourts si.nijlrl hr -inr,(4 ^f 21-1- surf-nn- r"rt. 'n s (-.(-urt
mpti. ri is. All or!,cI✓s shouirl le cl--ne,' out and 'Ll"led with tennis court
r--, th in. dpep should b filler2l.
surfacpr. '11 ',-rd baths ovpr 1P ,?
?'h
Pr. tpnn'-s court should be surfaced with Laykold 0-6 or in•roved eival.
Colorinr shall bz• of 17our cl-iolce. T,inlng to folio, T.!;
Tennis col_;rt Tr--;ck
Pl•irs. t -ssoc. s-r:•c!f`:!.:;t.lons.
,Tork w 1 lhi S4 rtes? --pt r� this r-ar s l.nrg n s cater the r :-. 11
',-,r th�� -.un 2 e f "10.00
I. m 7
rl.,sr r-U,rn slrrcri cri•,r
0-/_1 - 7 C
��11M /gl
OPTIMIST INTERNATIONAE
4494 LINDELL BOULEVARD ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63108 • 314 - 371.6000
Mr. Warren Hyde
City Hall
Edna, MN
Dear Mr. Hyde:
Octo ter 8, 1976
I
C
1
-N/
For the past twenty -two years Optimist International has
promoted Youth Appreciation Week to afford proper recognition
to the positive contributions made by youth toward a better
society. As Honorary Co- Chairmen of the 1976 Youth Appreciation
Week we are, requesting your assistance in bringing this obser-
vance to the attention of the general public.
By the issuing of a proclamation designating the second week
of November as Youth Appreciation Week in your city, efforts
to make appropriate recognition of the contributions of youth
will be strenghtened. Enclosed is a sample proclamation for
your consideration. Also enclosed is a brochure containing
highlights of the program..
Your cooperation and assistance will be greatly appreciated.
1
Lou Brock
Sincerely,
Bobbi Hull ."
Honorary Co- Chairmen, 1976 Youth Appreciation Week
LB /BH:igh
Enclosures
s�
J.
YOUTH APPRECIATION IJEEI:
P F O C L A iM A T I- O N
WHEREAS, The vast majority of youth are concerned, knowledgeable
and responsible citizens, and
IJFIEREAS, the accomplishments and achievements of these young
citizens deserve recognition and praise of their
elders, and
TMEREAS, Optimist International has for the past twenty -two
years promoted and conducted a program entitled
Youth Appreciation Week, which this year is to be
observed November 8- 14,and
11HEREAS, the citizens of
have indicated a desire to join with the Optimists in
expressing appreciation and approval of the contri-
butions of youth, I, therefore
proclaim November 8 -14, 1976, as Youth Appreciation
Greek in
By this action let it be known that we have faith in
the ability of today's youth as they assume responsible
roles in the future of mankind.
A
C ity' of �C�1 g1 S
4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 83424
927 -8861
Dear Resident:
The.Edina Traffic Safety Committee on Tuesday, October 12, 1976, at ,
9:00 A.M., City Hall Conference Room, will evaluate the results of the
traffic diverter located at the Mavelle Drive - Lynmar Lane intersection.
The Traffic Safety Committee will make a recommendation to the City
Council on whether to permanently install the traffic diverter or remove
it.
The Edina City Council will consider the Committee recommendation on
Monday, October 18, 1976, at 7:00 P.M., City Hall Council Chambers.
A short memorandum is attached to this informational notice to briefly
explain the background on this traffic diverter and a map showing compara-
tive 24 -hour traffic volumes at various locations before and after the
traffic diverter installation.
If you have further questions or comments on this issue, please contact
me at City Hall or call 927 -8861, Ext. 59.
i
4-
Fran Hoffman
Assistant City Engineer
Traffic & Transportation
Attachments
+ __, I. IN •� i N „] _ _ _
,• .b
i
R _ Q� Cj I 1 1 _� A.n G=•1 R fri'-a �.r'� I \ 1 - o� ()''
I # GLODCHESTE� :AVE.
to
I !' , p N , �,' W '1 , dp ��� ►a i !
�`� .
W
64 84 i F197 6�
891 135 1 37 -- ,.,�• �� i� •j
� �- a4
1 �,
Qom® ® ��..vcc;ti4'a.���O 6`���a'�.
�1 f1° O 1Ov-
J HEATHERTON 'ST•°' �4
6 94
0 Gl n. � b � 4'`'Q�t:3+ � f .� N C� I • °
Nrl
kj
BRISTOL -a N o °' 0I g E o° o ff
r_ _ i - 96.8
x,91 �- I �� O ' x p o
N
YoI• tS1 °�L. �'� a�V �� ��S' CP N;
IM
ti
n. 4 , tj 0�'�413 94 `al W
d9 g a!� \9 a\ Il �� u
voOi ® i0 N o N i� \•' b_ O LANE
Q 771; �q .
0.
LY N �,q A R ��... f�f f
o �.. v �' I2. 00 . N `w
w k
4 3.41 U~1 z •, 96.8
o eQ� b� , yh ` > =5.5s �.•A• >' 2:9.'6 'e
3 'g "O N 0�.
° , 1 ENT 01
� �� �` :• LO ► b I, GL.Oti11ft JT0 W'S
°
® �8 ��;.:.:uJ.,100� -,,a �,DDITION
e•
fl 'P' c. <,u �i c, y�'f`j. 17 °O� t�2Q.16 o�s4o•
'NCIS FNDELL ROAD-o'
150 bg 4,;
•• W
ti• ...,.� m $. d �, Sc
L L
o (. ,rbj� �.r 1P9� off„ 1" F °� I•J _� \c��O
418 1 ° ,' � 150 �U
MEMORANDUM
As you are aware, a.traffic diverter has been.in place at the Mavelle
- Drive - Lynmar Lane intersection for the past.six months. This - installation
has been in a temporary status and is now under consideration for perma-
nent installation.
The history on this traffic diverter is as fol,lowsl:
Background
As Yorktown has continued to develop in recent years, traffic circulation
problems developed on some of the residential streets. Residents of
Lynmar Lane expressed their concern in a letter to Mayor Van Valkenburg
dated- October 27, 1975.
Study Process
The City staff evaluated the area to determine if a feasible traffic
re- circulation plan could be developed using the evaluation criteria
attached. The Edina'Traffic Safety..Committee considered; several- alterna-
tives and concluded that the most effective device i at
inst llation. It was felt that the diverter wouleduce thipe
traffic, u.d. decrease noise pollution, safety .hazards , and litter that
is assoc'ated with heavier traffic.
f
Evaluation Criteria
The criteria used in evaluating the alternatives are described
below:
Service Criteria
1. Residential Accessibility - the ability of
the neighborhood residents to access the
surrounding arterial and collector streets.
2. Pedestrian Safety - the ability for pedestrians
to circulate safely within the neighborhood.'
3. Emergency Vehicle Access - the ability for all
emergency vehicles to access all development
within the neighborhood.
4. Local /Collector Street Relationship - the
attainment of an effective relationship between
local streets and collector streets.
Environmental Criteria
1. Lane Use Impact - the ability of the system
to complement existing land use patterns.
2. Traffic Volume Impact - the ability of the
plan to minimize the number of vehicles passing
the residential land uses.
.tC�y
M E M O R A N D U M
October 15, 1976
MEMO TO: Mr.. Warren C. Hyde
Council Members
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Assistant Director
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Purchase of Hockey Rink lighting at Normandale -and Highlands Park
The following are the two quotes received for the purchase of hockey rink
lighting at Normandale and Highlands park.
1. Edina Electric Company, 5244 Eden Cr., Edina, MN 55436
Normandale and Highlands Park - $2,308.00
2. Hilite Electric, 3600 Kennebeck Dr., Eagan, MN 55122
Normandale and Highlands Park - $2,300.00
Recommend award to Hilite Electric for the above purchase price totaling $2,300.00
. 7 V7 �-
CITY OF EDINA
PARK AND RECREATIO14 DEPARTMENT
BID PROPOSAL
Electrical work at Normandale and Highlands Park
Installing of owners electrical 24 fixtures on four poles at Highlands
and Normandale Park hockey rinks.
Bid should include the insulation of six 277 volt fixtures on each of
four poles and also the installation of two cross arms on each of four
poles.
Installing of underground wiring between the two existing poles.
Trenching done by the owner.
Increase the power from 240 to 277 volts. Installing transformer and
proper panel for increase of voltage.
M E M 0 R A N D U M
October 15, 1976
MEMO TO.: Mr., Warren C. Hyde
Council Members
FROM:- Bdb-.Kojetinj Assistant Director
0a 4 'rk and Recreation Department
SUBJECT.-' Sod for Soccer Field - Pamela Park 6000 yards
The following are the t'bree quotes
Rie.be S68 Company, Darwin, Minnesota
35t a yard Total $2,100.00
55t a yard laid' Total $3,300-00
2. Dale Green Company, 7751 Hwy. 169, Mpls., MN
45t a yard Total $2,700-00
Can't supply at this time.
3. Magnuson Sod Company, 6314 Standish Ave. S., Mpls., MN
40t a yard Total $2,400.00 Will not lay sod.
Award contract to Riebe Sod Company $3,300-00
1.
CITY OF EDINA
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
BID'PROPOSAL
Sodding of Soccer Field - Pamela Park
Laying sod on prepared soil at Pamela Park soccer field.
50 X 120 - total square yards 6000.
7j )Y--
WALTER M. BAKER
WILLIAM G. BALE
CHARLES A. BASSFORD, JR.
RICHARD J. GUNN
GEORGE C.MASTOR
ROBERT W. MATTSON
WAYNE H. OLSON
JAMES B. PROMAN
JACK A. ROSBERG
ALONZO B. SERAN
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Sir:
.Caw Offices MASTOR and MATTSON, Ltd.
315 PEAVEY BUILDING
730 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
TELEPHONE 339 -8846 AREA 612
October 14, 1976
Please put the enclosed resolution on the calendar for
the next City Council meeting. I have also enclosed a copy
of the Second Amended Declaration which will be executed and
filed with the resolution.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused
you. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
MASTOR AND MATTSON, LT .
By
,/William G. Ba. e
WGB /rmn
Enclosure
c.c.: Tom Erickson
53- 3.0208
M1110
SECOND AMENDED
DECLARATION OF.RESTRICTIONS
AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
This Second Amended Declaration of Restrictions and
Protective Covenants, made this day of October,
1976, by METRAM PROPERTIES COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation
( "Metram "), and YORK CONDO, INC., a Minnesota corporation
( "Condo "),
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Metram is the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition, according to the duly recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Condo is the owner. of Lot 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition,.according to the duly recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, said Lots 1 and 2 are encumbered by a Declaration
of Restrictions and Protective Covenants (the "Declaration ")
filed in the office of the Registrar of Titles,, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as Document No. 1033727, as amended by
Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants
(the "Amendment ") filed in the office of the Registrar of
Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as Document No. 1175306;
and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides in paragraph 8 thereof
that the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declara-
tion may be released by the City (formerly Village) of Edina
by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has duly released the
restrictions found in paragraph 5.c of the Declaration as
amended which pertained to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition..
NOW, THEREFORE, as a substitute for the restriction in
paragraph 5.c of the Declaration as amended that has been
released by the City. Council, Metram and Condo do hereby
impose upon Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition
and Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition are
hereby made subject to, the following covenants and restric-
tions, which shall operate as equitable restrictions and
covenants passing with title to Lots land 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, and shall apply to and bind each
and every present and future owner, occupier, and encumbrancer
thereof, in addition.to the unreleased covenants and restric-
tions in the Declaration which are applicable to said Lots 1
and 2, to -wit:
.1. (i) Each building on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, containing dwelling units may be
of varying heights comprising any combination of three,
four, five or six stories;
(ii). Buildings, parking areas, driveways, and
other hard - surfaced, nonvegetative areas on the lot shall
not cover, in the aggregate, more than sixty (60 %) per cent
of the. area of the lot.
2. The covenants and restrictions herein contained
may be released only by the City of Edina and may be released
as to Lots 1 and 2,. Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, by
the City of Edina at any time and from time to time by its
sole act. Any such release shall be done by resolution by
the Edina City Council and shall be effective only upon the
recording of such resolution in the same office in which
this instrument has been recorded.
METRAM PROPERTIES COMPANY-
By
Its
YORK CONDO, INC.
By
Its.
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 1976, by
the
of Metram Properties Company, a Minnesota corporation, on
behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of ,,1976, by
the ,
of York Condo, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of
the - corporation.
Notary Public
-2-
CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE
The undersigned, mortgagee of Lots.l and 2, Block. 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, according to the duly recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota,-as evidenced by
Document No. 1095553, files of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby joins in the Second
Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants
to which this Consent is attached, and does hereby, for
itself -and its successors and assigns, agree that its
mortgage. lien, and its interest as mortgagee, in, on, and to
said Lots 1 and 2 is subject to the covenants and restrictions
imposed upon said Lots 1 and 2 by the said Second Amended
Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants.
Dated:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
On this day of 1976, before
me, a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
appeared and
to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did
say that they are the and
of First National Bank of St. Paul,
a national banking association, that the seal affixed to said
instrument is the seal of said bank, and that said instrument
was signed and sealed in behalf of said bank by authority of
.,its Board of Directors, and said
and acknowledged said instrument to
be the free act and deed of said bank.
Notary Public
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Edina does hereby release Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second.Addition,,according to the duly recorded plat
thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, from the covenants and
restrictions set out in paragraph 5.c of the Declaration of
Restrictions and Protective Covenants filed as Document
No. 1033727, files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota,.as modified by the Amended Declaration
of Restrictions and Protective Covenants filed as Document
No. 1175306.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolution
shall not be effective unless and until there is delivered.
to the City an amendment to said .Declaration of Restrictions
and Protective Covenants, duly signed by the owner and all
claimants of an interest in said Lots 1 and 2, and in
recordable form, reimposing upon said Lots 1 and 2 the
following restrictions;
1. (i) The buildings on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, containing dwelling units may be
of varying heights comprising any combination of 3, 4, 5 or
6 stories.
(ii) Buildings, parking areas, driveways, and
other hard - surfaced, nonvegetative areas on the lot shall
not cover, in the aggregate, more than sixty (60a) per cent
of the area of the lot.
2. The covenants and restrictions herein contained
may be released only by the City of Edina and may be released
as to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, by
the City of Edina at any time and from time to time by its
sole act. Any such release shall be done by resolution of
the Edina City Council and shall be effective only upon the
recording of such resolution in the same office in which
said Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective
Covenants has been recorded; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the foregoing resolutions
shall supercede those resolutions adopted April 19, 1976,
with respect to Lot 4, Block 6, Yorktown, now replatted as
Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, and the
resolutions adopted September 20, 1976, as to Lots 1 and 2,
Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss.
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk
for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of 1976,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Pleeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this
of , 1976._
City Clerk
day
SECOND AMENDED
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS
AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
This Second Amended Declaration of Restrictions and
Protective Covenants, made this day of October,
1976, by METRAM PROPERTIES COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation
( "Metram "), and YORK CONDO, INC., a Minnesota corporation
( "Condo "),
WITNESSETH THAT:
WHEREAS, Metram is the owner of Lot 1, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition, according to the duly recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota;. and
WHEREAS, Condo is the owner of Lot 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition, according to the duly recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin .County, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, said Lots 1 and 2 are encumbered by a Declaration
of Restrictions and Protective Covenants (the "Declaration ")
filed in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, as Document No. 1033727, as amended by
Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants
(the "Amendment ") filed in the office of the Registrar of
Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as Document No. 1175306;
and
WHEREAS, the Declaration provides in paragraph 8 thereof
that the covenants and restrictions contained in the Declara-
tion may be released by the City (formerly Village) of Edina
by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has duly released the.
restrictions found in paragraph 5.c of the Declaration as
amended which pertained.to. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown
Second Addition.
NOW, THEREFORE, as a substitute for the restriction in
paragraph 5.c of the Declaration as amended that has been
released by the City Council, Metram and Condo do hereby
impose upon Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition
and Lots 1 and.2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition are
hereby.made subject to, the following covenants and restric-
tions, which shall operate as equitable restrictions and
covenants passing with title to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, and shall apply to and bind each
and every present and future owner, occupier, and encumbrancer
thereof, in addition to the unreleased covenants and restric-
tions in the Declaration which are applicable to said Lots 1
and 2, to -wit:
1. (i) Each building on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, containing dwelling units may be
of varying heights comprising any combination of three,
four, five or six stories;
(ii) Buildings, parking areas, driveways, and
other hard - surfaced, . nonvegetative areas on the lot shall
not cover, in the aggregate, more than sixty (600) per cent
of the area of the.lot..
2. The covenants and restrictions herein.contained
may be released only by the City of Edina and may be released
as to Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Yorktown Second Addition, by
the City of Edina at any time and from time to time by its
sole act. Any such release shall be done by resolution by
the Edina City Council and shall be effective only upon the
recording of such resolution in the same office in which
this instrument has been recorded.
METRAM PROPERTIES COMPANY
By
Its
YORK CONDO, INC.
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 1976, by
the ,
of Metram.Properties Company, a Minnesota corporation, on
behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
J ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
day of 1976, by
the ,
of York Condo, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of
the corporation.
Notary Public
-2-
CONSENT OF MORTGAGEE
The undersigned, mortgagee of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Yorktown Second Addition, according to the duly recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as evidenced by
Document No. 1095553, files of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, hereby joins in the Second
Amended Declaration of Restrictions and Protective Covenants
to which this Consent is attached, and does hereby, for
itself and its successors and assigns, agree that its
mortgage lien, and its interest as mortgagee, in, on, and to.
said Lots.l and 2 is subject to the covenants and restrictions.
imposed upon said Lots 1 and 2 by the said Second Amended
Declaration of Restrictions and Protective. Covenants.
Dated:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PAUL
By
Its
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss.
COUNTY OF RAMSEY )
On this day of 1976, before
j me, a Notary Public within and for said county, personally
! appeared and ,
to me personally known, who, being each by me duly sworn, did
say that they are the and
of First National Bank of St. Paul,
a national banking association, that the seal affixed to said
instrument is the.seal of said bank,.and that said instrument
was signed and sealed in behalf of said bank by authority of
its Board of Directors, and said
and acknowledged said instrument to
be the free act and deed of said bank.
Notary Public
WALTER M. BAKER
WILLIAM G. BALE
2awOffices MASTOR and MATTSON, Ltd.
CHARLES A. BASSFORD. JR.
CHARLES P. DANA
315 PEAVEY BUILDING '
RICHARD J. GUNN
730 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
DAVID R. KNODELL
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
GEORGE C. MASTOR
TELEPHONE 339-8846 AREA 612
ROBERT W. MATTSON
WAYNE H. OLSON
JACK A. ROSBERG
ALONZO B. SERAN
STEVEN J. TIMMER
October 14, 1976
Thomas Erickson, Esq.
Dorsey, Marquart, Windhorst,
West & Halladay
First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Erickson:
Pursuant to our phone conversation of today., enclosed
find a copy of the material I mailed to the City Clerk.
I want to express my appreciation for your help in
this matter. It is now a matter of no small embarrassment
on our part.
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
MASTOR ANDIMATITSON, LTD.
By
Charles P. ana
Enclosures
v
Enclosures
53- 3.0208 Z' c/
r
WALTER M. BAKER
- WILLIAM G. BALE - - 'aw0ffices
MASTOR and MATTSON, Ltd.
CHARLES A. BASSFORD, JR.
-
RICHARD J. GUNN
315 PEAVEY BUILDING
GEORGE C. MASTOR
730 SECOND AVENUE 'SOUTH
ROBERT W. MATTSON
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
WAYNE H. OLSON
-
JAMES B. PROMAN
TELEPHONE 339 -8846 AREA 612
. JACK A. ROSBERG -
ALONZO,B. SERAN.
October 14,.1976
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 554.24
Dear Sir:
Please put the enclosed resolution on the calendar for
the next City Council meeting. I
have.also enclosed a copy
of the Second Amended Declaration
which will be executed and
filed with the resolution.
I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused
you.. Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
MASTOR AND MATTSON, LTD.
By
William G. Bale
WGB /rmn
Enclosure
c.c.: Tom Erickson
53- 3.0208
j
November 18, 1976
Air. John O'Sullivan
Hennepin County Criminal Justice Council
312 4th AVe.' S. 55415
Minneapolis, MN'
Dear Air. O'Sullivan:
Enclosed herewith is a certified. copy of the resolution adopted by -the
Edina City Council on October 18, 1976, entering into "Hennepin Emergency
'Communication Organization Joint and Cooperative Agreement" with'fiennepin
County and naming.Robert J. Buresh as Director and Warren C, Hyde as.
Alternate Director.
Enclosed also are two executed-copies of the Joint and .Cooperative
Agreement which have been.signed by the riayor and City 114anager. Will you
please have one copy executed by your officials and return one copy tome
at your earliest opportunity?
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
enclosures
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby enter into
"Hennepin Emergency Communication Organization Joint and Cooperative
Agreement" with Hennepin County. said Agreement being approved by
the Public Safety Communications Interim User Board on October 12,
1976, and does hereby name Robert J. Buresh as Director and Warren C.
Hyde as Alternate Director in accordance with Article IV, Section 4
of the new HECO Agreement.
ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1976.
1
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF- HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution
was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
October 18, 1976.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21st day of October, 1976.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby enter into
"Hennepin Emergency Communication Organization Joint and Cooperative
Agreement with Hennepin County. said Agreement being approved by
the Public Safety Communications Interim User Board on October 12,
1976, and does hereby name Robert J. Buresh as Director and Warren C.
Hyde as Alternate Director in accordance with Article IV, Section 4
of the new HECO Agreement...
ADOPTED this 18th day of October, 1976.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE.OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution
was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
October 18, 1976.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 21st day of October, 1976.
City Clerk
o"
Jo�TIoN
m
176 -196
October 15,.1976
To: Municipal Administrators and Managers in Hennepin County
From: Wayne Burggraaff, Chairman, Interim User Board
Re: Implementation of HECO Agreement
As you know, the original Hennepin Emergency Communications Organi-
zation (HECO) Agreement was executed earlier this year by the Henne-
pin County Board of Commissioners, the Minneapolis City Council
and the city councils of 20 Hennepin County suburban municipalities.
However, HECO did not become an operational entity (per the terms
of Article V, Section l which stated: "The Agreement shall become
effective when it has been executed by Hennepin County, the Henne-
pin County Sheriff, the city of Minneapolis and seven other eligible
governmental units in Hennepin County... ") as the Hennepin County
Sheriff was prohibited from executing the Agreement based upon a
legal opinion issued by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office.
This issue was brought to the attention of the Interim User Board
(IUB) at a special meeting on September 15, 1976. Following con -
siderable discussion which substantiated--the countywide interest
in seeking an alternative way in which to resolve this issue, the
original drafting committee (Havir, Pidgeon, Willis, Omodt and
Peterson) was re- appointed and charged with the responsibility
"to develop a working alternative with as little change as pos-
sible in the concept and agreement as originally developed." In
the next several weeks, that committee met three times and ful-
filled the charge given it by the IUB.
The drafting committee presented its recommendations for amend -
ment at a special meeting on October 12, 1976. The major substan-
tive change,. in accord with the previously mentioned legal opinion,
was to eliminate the requirement for the Hennepin County Sheriff
to execute and sign the Agreement. This modification occasioned
a series of related amendments. Following a detailed review and
discussion, the amendments were accepted by consensus and the
new HECO Agreement was recommended for passage by all eligible .
units of government in Hennepin County.
Transmitted herewith, please find a copy of the new HECO Agreement
dated October 12, 1976, a "Summary of Amendments to the 2/18/76
HECO Agreement, Approved 10/12/76," and the minutes of the October
12, 1976, special IUB meeting. Each unit of government in Hennepin
County is urged to take the following action as soon as possible:
telephone: 869 -7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
aw
L
cc
■®
Q.
s®
O
O�
o
cc
C
W
Jo�TIoN
m
176 -196
October 15,.1976
To: Municipal Administrators and Managers in Hennepin County
From: Wayne Burggraaff, Chairman, Interim User Board
Re: Implementation of HECO Agreement
As you know, the original Hennepin Emergency Communications Organi-
zation (HECO) Agreement was executed earlier this year by the Henne-
pin County Board of Commissioners, the Minneapolis City Council
and the city councils of 20 Hennepin County suburban municipalities.
However, HECO did not become an operational entity (per the terms
of Article V, Section l which stated: "The Agreement shall become
effective when it has been executed by Hennepin County, the Henne-
pin County Sheriff, the city of Minneapolis and seven other eligible
governmental units in Hennepin County... ") as the Hennepin County
Sheriff was prohibited from executing the Agreement based upon a
legal opinion issued by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office.
This issue was brought to the attention of the Interim User Board
(IUB) at a special meeting on September 15, 1976. Following con -
siderable discussion which substantiated--the countywide interest
in seeking an alternative way in which to resolve this issue, the
original drafting committee (Havir, Pidgeon, Willis, Omodt and
Peterson) was re- appointed and charged with the responsibility
"to develop a working alternative with as little change as pos-
sible in the concept and agreement as originally developed." In
the next several weeks, that committee met three times and ful-
filled the charge given it by the IUB.
The drafting committee presented its recommendations for amend -
ment at a special meeting on October 12, 1976. The major substan-
tive change,. in accord with the previously mentioned legal opinion,
was to eliminate the requirement for the Hennepin County Sheriff
to execute and sign the Agreement. This modification occasioned
a series of related amendments. Following a detailed review and
discussion, the amendments were accepted by consensus and the
new HECO Agreement was recommended for passage by all eligible .
units of government in Hennepin County.
Transmitted herewith, please find a copy of the new HECO Agreement
dated October 12, 1976, a "Summary of Amendments to the 2/18/76
HECO Agreement, Approved 10/12/76," and the minutes of the October
12, 1976, special IUB meeting. Each unit of government in Hennepin
County is urged to take the following action as soon as possible:
telephone: 869 -7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
aw
L
O
Q.
s®
O
O�
D
Jo�TIoN
m
176 -196
October 15,.1976
To: Municipal Administrators and Managers in Hennepin County
From: Wayne Burggraaff, Chairman, Interim User Board
Re: Implementation of HECO Agreement
As you know, the original Hennepin Emergency Communications Organi-
zation (HECO) Agreement was executed earlier this year by the Henne-
pin County Board of Commissioners, the Minneapolis City Council
and the city councils of 20 Hennepin County suburban municipalities.
However, HECO did not become an operational entity (per the terms
of Article V, Section l which stated: "The Agreement shall become
effective when it has been executed by Hennepin County, the Henne-
pin County Sheriff, the city of Minneapolis and seven other eligible
governmental units in Hennepin County... ") as the Hennepin County
Sheriff was prohibited from executing the Agreement based upon a
legal opinion issued by the Hennepin County Attorney's Office.
This issue was brought to the attention of the Interim User Board
(IUB) at a special meeting on September 15, 1976. Following con -
siderable discussion which substantiated--the countywide interest
in seeking an alternative way in which to resolve this issue, the
original drafting committee (Havir, Pidgeon, Willis, Omodt and
Peterson) was re- appointed and charged with the responsibility
"to develop a working alternative with as little change as pos-
sible in the concept and agreement as originally developed." In
the next several weeks, that committee met three times and ful-
filled the charge given it by the IUB.
The drafting committee presented its recommendations for amend -
ment at a special meeting on October 12, 1976. The major substan-
tive change,. in accord with the previously mentioned legal opinion,
was to eliminate the requirement for the Hennepin County Sheriff
to execute and sign the Agreement. This modification occasioned
a series of related amendments. Following a detailed review and
discussion, the amendments were accepted by consensus and the
new HECO Agreement was recommended for passage by all eligible .
units of government in Hennepin County.
Transmitted herewith, please find a copy of the new HECO Agreement
dated October 12, 1976, a "Summary of Amendments to the 2/18/76
HECO Agreement, Approved 10/12/76," and the minutes of the October
12, 1976, special IUB meeting. Each unit of government in Hennepin
County is urged to take the following action as soon as possible:
telephone: 869 -7521 (612)
an equal opportunity employer
Municipal Administrators and Managers in Hennepin County
October 15, 1976
Page Two
1. Submit the new HECO Agreement dated 10/12/76 to your govern-
ing boards for consideration and action. (Your earlier reso-
lution of support on the original HECO Agreement need not be
rescinded as that agreement was never in force and effect.)
2. A certified copy of the resolution authorizing execution of
the new HECO Agreement together with-an executed copy of the
new Agreement should be filed with the Hennepin County Admin-
istrator on or before December 31, 1976. The resolution auth-
orizing execution of the Agreement should also designate the
G� director and alternate director in accordance with Article IV,
-Section of the new greement.
i� 3. The new Agreement provides that initial members are those who
join on or before December 31, 1976, and further provides that
governmental units joining after that date shall be admitted
only on the favorable vote of two - thirds of the members of the
Board. While the December 31 date establishes a firm deadline,
you are encouraged to pass a new resolution and execute the
new Agreement as soon as possible.
Even during this recent period of delay, the planning process directed toward
improving our public_saf ety_ communications systems has proceeded. Much of
what has transpired in the past several months, especially activities related
to the implementation of 911 emergency telephone service, demands that we
devote immediate attention to executing this new HECO Agreement. Specif-
ically, the 911 planning process has reached the stage wherein the initial
responsibility for HECO will be the negotiation of implementation costs and
scheduling with the telephone companies serving our county - -we have been
advised that this process could commence as early as December 1, 1976. I
trust you mutually share in the commitment of myself, other municipal admin-
istrators, Sheriff Omodt and the many public safety officials in our county
to execute the HECO Agreement as soon as possible. Accordingly, we ask that
you bring this matter to the attention of your governing boards at your ear-
liest convenience. Any municipality having questions concerning the new
HECO Agreement should contact John O'Sullivan of the Hennepin County Criminal
Justice Council at 348 -6497.
bjr
Enclosures
i
Emergency Medical Services
(812) 348 -8428
H2NN @PIN COUNTY
October 7, 1976
Mr. Bob Buresh
Director of Public Safety & Fire Chief
Edina City Hall
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Bob:
616 South 7th Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
G. Patrick Lilja, M.D.
EMS Project Director
John C. Luce
EMS Project Coordinator
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Emergency Medical Services
Couicil which was created by the Hennepin County Board of Commission -
ers at their meeting on September 21, 1976. Edina, as a community
providing advanced life support units is eligible for one member on
this council under Article 2, number 3. In addition, on October 5,
1976, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has let bids for the
radio equipment to interface between advanced life support units and
major emergency hospitals within Hennepin County. This is a total
of approximately $320,000 worth of radio equipment, and, as a provid-
er of advanced life support, you will be eligible for part of this
radio equipment. As you will.note, if you wish to participate on
the council and be a member of the radio system, it will be necessary
for you to formally join the council and sign the Contract Agreement
which is attached.
I am hopeful that Edina will become one of the original members
of this council. In order that we may provide the necessary user
board support, as well as get the council going, we are asking a
decision be made by October 29, 1976 as to your willingness to par-
ticipate. It also is necessary in that the providers of the radio
equipment must know the number of participants in order to provide
their bid specifications.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
G. Patrick Lilja, M.D.
Director, Hennepin County EMS Project
GPL/ kb
RESOLUTION N0. 76 -9 -1024
SEP 191b
z
3 Commissioner Olson , Chairman Health and Social Servi(
•- Committee, offered the following resolution:
WHEREAS, Hennepin County recognizes the.valuable life saving and life
sustaining efforts being provided by both public and privately supported agencies
and institutions of Emergency Medical Services; and
WHEREAS, these organizations providing certain EMS pre - hospital services
within Hennepin County desire to contract with the County to provide certain advice
and counsel to the Board of County Commissioners under the terms and conditions
of said "Plan for Emergency Medical Services," dated August 18, 1976.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners establishes
the Emergency Medical Services Council in accordance with the "Plan for Hennepin
- County Emergency Medical Services ".
The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were f i ve YEAS
and no NAYS as follows:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS YEA NAY
Thomas E- Ticen X
Thomas L. Olson X
John E. Derus X
E. F. Robb, Jr. X
Richard 0. Hanson, Chairman X
I
j
Resolution adopted.
ATTEST:v
Deputy County AucYitor
i
OTHER
s
f
PLAN FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
ARTICLE 1. Establishment.
There shall be established under the Hennepin County Board of Com-
missioners the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL, hereinafter
referred to as the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
ARTICLE 2. Purpose.
It shall be the purpose of this HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL to recommend
to the appropriate authorities, public or private, those steps within its
judgment are needed for the coordination and improvement of the prehospital
emergency health care services within Hennepin County. This Council is to
pay particular attention to the areas of training requirements of emergency
personnel, use of the F.C.C. assigned UHF Emergency Medical Services radio
frequencies, and coordination and usage of emergency ambulances within
Hennepin County. This Council shall encourage the sharing of services among
providers of emergency medical services to achieve a high level of pro-
fessional competence in dealing with medical emergencies at,the most economical
cost feasible.
ARTICLE 3. Membership.
1. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL shall be composed of the County of
Hennepin and such other entities, eligible as defined below, as the Hennepin
County Board may from time -to -time contract with for the services of delegates
to the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
2. The delegates to the Council from the County of Hennepin shall
be the Administrator of Hennepin County Medical Center and a physician from the
Department of Emergency Medicine at Hennepin County Medical Center to be selected
by the Hennepin County Board, and delegates in the number specified below from
each entity authorized below to be members of and to send delegates to the
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
3. Any unit of state or local government which renders full -time
Advanced Life Support emergency ambulance services within Hennepin County may
send one delegate to the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL. If such emergency
services are provided through a joint powers agreement combination of municipal
units, then that combination rather than the individual municipalities shall
be eligible for one delegate whose selection shall be determined by the
municipalities in the agreement.
w
-2-
4. Each hospital institution which has been categorized by the
Metropolitan Health Board as a "Regional Emergency Medical Center" in their
recommendation "Metropolitan EMS Categorization Plan," 30 October, 1975 or by any
equivalent plan of the Metropolitan Health Board characterizing hospitals as
"Regional Emergency Medical Center" may send two delegates to the HENNEPIN
COUNTY EMS COUNCIL. Presently the institutions so categorized include:
a. Fairview - Southdale Hospital;
b. Methodist Hospital;
C. North Memorial Medical Center; and
d. Metropolitan Medical Center /Hennepin County Medical Center
as one unit, which automatically has representation on the
- HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL and shall be entitled to no further
delegates.
Except for MMC /HCMC, each hospital institution qualifying as a member of the
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL pursuant to this paragraph may send to the
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL one delegate who is an administrator and one
delegate who is an emergency physician active in the day -to -day practice of
emergency medicine and who has the authority and responsibility to represent
the medical staff of that institution.
5. Each ambulance service within Hennepin County which is not under
the control of a hospital institution qualifying for membership under this Plan,
and which has been recognized by HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL as an Advanced
Life Support Service providing physician- supervised paramedic service to the
public may apply to the EMS COUNCIL for membership and if accepted may send
one delegate to the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
6. Hospitals outside of Hennepin County who wish to participate in
the sharing of the F.C.C. assigned UHF Emergency Medical Services frequencies and
utilize the Hennepin County Medical Control Center may each send two delegates to
the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL. One of these delegates shall be a physician
active in the full -time provision of emergency medical services in said
hospital and one shall be an administrator. Corporate entities having
operation ,1l control over multiple hospitals and /or ambulance services shall
be limited to one administrative representative and one medical representative
from said corporations on the COUNCIL.
-3-
ARTICLE 4. Meetings and Officers.
1. Within 30 days of the execution of valid contracts for services
with a majority of the eligible members, the Hennepin County Administrator
shall call the first meeting of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL, and such meeting
shall be held not later than 15 days thereafter.
2. At the first meeting of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL, and
the first meeting following each anniversary thereof the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS
COUNCIL shall elect from its membership one chairperson and one associate
chairperson, one to be an "emergency physician" member, and one to be elected
from the "non- physician" membership. At those times the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS
COUNCIL shall also elect one secretary and one treasurer who may at the
discretionof the COUNCIL be the same person.
3. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL shall have the authority to
select an executive committee and to delegate to such executive committee such
of its authority as it may see fit.
4. At the first meeting of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL and
periodically thereafter as the COUNCIL may deem fit, the COUNCIL shall adopt
by -laws governing its procedures, including the time, place and frequency of
its regular public meetings. Such by -laws may be amended at the regular public
meetings of the COUNCIL. Regular public meetings of the COUNCIL, however,
shall be held at least quarterly.
5. Notice of regular meetings of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL
shall be given to the delegates at least ten days in advance of the meetings.
6. Complete and accurate minutes shall be maintained of each
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL meeting and copies of said minutes shall be
transmitted to the legal address of each delegate prior to the next meeting
of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL. Upon approval and adoption of these minutes,
a copy of the same shall be transmitted within ten days to all delegates and
their nominating members as appropriate.
7. Robert's Rules of Order shall govern the proceedings at all
meetings of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL in all matters not otherwise
governed by this Plan, or by any by -laws promulgated by the COUNCIL.
8. Delegates to the COUNCIL shall not be compensated for their
services as delegates by either the County of Hennepin or by the EMS COUNCIL
itself; but this shall not prevent a delegate from receiving compensation
as otherwise authorized.by law from the member sending him to the COUNCIL.
• 4 -4-
ARTICLE 5.
Powers and Duties.
1. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL may appoint such standing com-
mittess, ad hoc committees, task forces and special work groups as it deems
necessary, but one of these standing committees shall audit the quality
of medical care. Memberships on these committees, may be drawn from HENNEPIN
COUNTY EMS COUNCIL delegates and from outside agencies, units -of government, and
citizen- groups. All committees shall be accountable to the COUNCIL.
2. Where authorized by law to do so, the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL
may apply for donations, gifts or grants of money from the state or federal
government or any other governmental units, or from individuals, foundations
or other organizations to perform any work or activities consistent with this
Plan. Where required by law the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL shall make such
'j application or accept such grants through or with the authorization of the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners expressed by their resolution.
3. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL shall study and evaluate on an
on -going basis the quality of pre - hospital emergency medical services provided
within Hennepin County and based upon its evaluation may take any or all of
the following actions:
a. Render advice and technical assistance upon request to
governmental and private members of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
b. Recommend to the appropriate governmental or private
authorities those steps which the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL believes need
to be taken to achieve the delivery of high quality pre - hospital emergency
medical services throughout Hennepin County.
c. Establish and publish advisory guidelines for the ac-
hievements of high quality pre - hospital emergency medical services.
4. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL shall
recommend to the County Board of Hennepin County how said County Board can
best utilize authority given to it by the Laws of Minnesota for 1967, C. 753,
for the regulation and licensing of ambulance service within said Hennepin County.
5. All HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL members may establish and operate
various elements of a pre - hospital emergency medical service system as a unit
of that member, but if such services impact more than of the member's own
areas of operation, the member shall seek from the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS
COUNCIL direction and advice on policy and policy - related matters in the
establishment and operation of such emergency medical services.
-5-
6. No action by the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL shall bind or alter
the power and authority of any unit of government or any private member of the
HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
7. The HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL may with the consent of the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, hire such employees, consultants, or
professional services as the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL and the Hennepin County
Board may deem necessary to best fulfill the functions of the HENNEPIN COUNTY
EMS COUNCIL. Any employees shall be deemed to be employees of- Hennepin County.
ARTICLE 6. Withdrawal, dissolution and Duration.
1. Any member, may, by resolution of its governing body or corporation,
give written notice ' of -its withdrawal from the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL -in
accordance with the terms and conditions of its contract for service with the
County of Hennepin. At least 60 days notice shall be given for such withdrawal.
2. This contract shall automatically be renewed by the County of
Hennepin unless the County of Hennepin gives 60 days notice prior to the
expiration of this contract that it does not intend to renew said contract.
Failure on the part of Hennepin County to renew this contract with any con-
tracting regional emergency hospital shall nullify all other contracts and the
council shall be dissolved.
3. In the event of dissolution of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL,
any property acquired as a result of the activities of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS
COUNCIL and any surplus monies in the budget of the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS
COUNCIL shall be distributed or returned to their donors in compliance with
prevailing state or federal law. Whenever not otherwise provided for and whenever
feasible, any remaining property or money shall be returned on the bases of pro -
rata share to its contributors. Any money or property not otherwise distributed
shall be the property of the County of Hennepin.
ARTICLE 7. Amendments.
Amendments to this Plan may be proposed by the Hennepin County
Administrator, by appropriate action by the governing board of any governmental
or private member, or by any delegate to the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL.
In no event, however, will such proposed amendment take effect except when
all of the following procedures have been met.
1. The amendment shall be submitted in writing to every member
and delegate at least 30 days prior to the time that it appears on the agenda
of a HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL meeting.
2. Proposed amendments must be approved at an HENNEPIN COUNTY
-6-
EMS COUNCIL meeting by a two - thirds vote of the delegates present and voting
at an HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL meeting provided that a majority of delegates
are at the meeting.
3. Any amendment so approved by the HENNEPIN COUNTY EMS COUNCIL
shall be approved by appropriate action of any member required by law to approve
the amendment.
4. Such amendment shall finally take effect if approved by the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners::