Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-07-21_COUNCIL MEETINGJULY 21, 1975 ROLL CALL MINUTES of June 16, 1975, approved as'submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by INTRODUCTION OF THREE NEW FIRE FIGHTERS DEMONSTRATION BY GRADUATE PARAMEDICS I. PUBLIC HEARING ON PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT Presentation by Manager and'Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution Ordering Improvement. 4/5 favorable roll call vote to pass. A. Water'Main Improvement No. P -WM -294 - Doncaster Way from Croyden Lane to Ayrshire Blvd. (Continued from 7/7/75). II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVALS Affidavits of Notice. .Pre - sentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable roll call vote to pass. A. Nine Mile North 2nd Addition - North of Londonderry Townhouse Project, East of Lincoln Drive and Nine Mile Creek, West of Londonderry Road - S -75 -8 (7/2/75) - Rauenhorst Corporation. B. Nagengast Addition - North of Doron Drive and South of Crosstown Highway 5 -75 -9 (7/2/75) - J.J. Nagengast III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON STREET AND ALLEY VACATIONS Affidavits of Notice. Pre- sentation by Engineer. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution.- 3/5 favorable roll call vote with petition of majority of abutting property owners. 4/5 favorable roll call vote to pass if less than majority of abutting property:owners sign petition or if no petition is presented. A._ Alley-Vacation. -Block 5, Harriet Manor 2nd Addition (Abbott /Beard /W.59/W.60). B. Brookside Ave. - Behind Grandview Liquor..Store. IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON LOT DIVISION Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable roll call vote to pass. A. Lot 2, Sharpe Bakke Addition - 6,600 Gleason Road - LD -75 -4 (7/2/75). V. AWARD OF BIDS Tabulation and recommendation by City Manager. Action of Council.by motion. A. Public Improvements. . VI. COMMUNICATIONS A. Petition - Ornamental Street Lights, Arbour Ave. between W. 61st & Sun Rd. B. Petition - Storm Sewer - Wayne Sweet VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Planning Commission 1. Final Plat Approval a. M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition, S -75 -6 (5- 28 -75). b. McCauley Heights 5th Addition, 5 -74 -9 (10- 16 -74).. B. Dutch Elm Removal Policy. C. Bloomington Annexation. D. Election Questions Official Wording. E. Minneapolis Northfield & Southern Railway Retaining Wall Easement. F. Hennepin County Health Coalition Forum meeting. G. South Hennepin Human Services Report. H. Traffic Safety Minutes 7/15/75. I. Audit Report - 1974. J. August 18 Joint Meeting - School Board. y AGENDA JULY 21, 1975 Page Two VIII. ORDINANCES First Reading requires offering of Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable roll call vote to pass Second Reading. A. First Reading. 1. Ordinance No. 1353 - Licensing and regulating.health clubs, massage parlors, escort services, etc. B. Second Reading. 1. Ordinance No. 811 -A62 - Requiring signs for proposed rezonings and subdivisions. Set Hearing Date. IX. RESOLUTIONS XT Use of M.S.A. Funds for City Share of T.H.100 /50th Street Signals.- B. Use of M.S.A. Funds for portion of City Share Storm Sewer.No. 138. X. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL. XI. FINANCE A. 56th & Oaklawn Street Light (L -11). B. Claims Paid: Motion of , seconded by and -- carried for payment of the following claims: General .& Revenue Sharing, $269,112.49; Construction Fund, $150,900.74; Park Funds, $83,343.80; Water Fund, $19,380.93; Liquor Fund, $200,974.40; Sewer Fund, $55,792.01; Improvements, $1,000.00; TOTAL, $780,504.37. W. E. JOHNSTON 5636 Queen Ave. So. Minneapolis, Minn. 55410 Mr. James Van Valkenburg Mayor of the City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Van Valkenburg: Area Code 612 -M -0770 July 79 1975 Enclosed are copies of the presentation of Hyde Park.Development company to the City Council June 3rd, 1974, and a copy of a recent decision of the state Supreme Court related to the. same subject. We expect that Edina --and other munieipal$ ties- -will- review-- -- -- their zoning decisions relative to the "necessary written consent of two - thirds of the property owners both within.the area to be rezoned and within 100 feet from the boundary of the area." Please inform us.by registered mail of any and all meetings to be held concerning this matter. It is fortunate that there has been no construction on the building sites contiguous to Hyde Park by the' owners of Braemar Hills 7th Addition. With best regards, I remain Sincerely; W� E. .-Johnston, Secretary Hyde;Park Development Co. Copies to: P. K. Peterson Mel Astleford Warren Hyde Tom Erickson Jack Smuckler Gordon Schuster W. W. Lewis This relates to Hyde Park and Hyde Park Znd Addition as they - relate to the subjects of storm sewer drains and to the relationship of multiple dwelling apartments called town houses. Upon study of the plans for Braemar Hills 7th Addition we fine that six of their proposed units are approximately 50 feet from the south boundry of Hyde Park Property which is zoned single family and so planned* our land was zoned single family in 19 71 by a special hearingboncerning this land. _ ,,.,�...,�..r.rw -.• •._o +T:: . �OMhY..�Y.:..._._.o..:_... . Mr:... -_... ,.., (A no officer of Hyde Park Development Company was ever notified of any hearings concerning The Braemar Hills 7ths plans we must presume that the errors involved in letting plans be completed with only 50,not 200 feet, between the single family area and the multiple family area were those of the planning and engineering departments. Surely no member of the planning commission or the city council would have let this mistake go as far as it has had they ^been informed. But - But the error can be corrected as no buildings have been started in that immediate area. Simply remove all of these -.buildings from the plan and proceed as otherwise planned. We are not and have not been opposed to Braemar Hills 7th addition for town houses . We cannot, however, approve of ap- a 'ti• ^.eats as close as,the plans show to homes* The rule eof� r 200footiapproval family lots: and even in this matter must be followed. -- The driveway of the nearest building is ten feet from our-r-- -- -- - property line and the most distant dimension. is .100_ feet,, . _ '16 units are planned in an area of 1 and-! acres, _ This oversight was found by our.engineers.on the plat seen aill In one of the utility company offices. Since othen ssever Hills 7th attempts have geen made to contact through their local architects office. The office of Relocation Realty of Milwaukee was called twcontact us assurance There mhas them that the engineer in charge would been no reply. The stacking or packing of these apartments into otherwise green area of the property has brought about - serious relations between Hyde Park Development company and the city planning department, The land that would normally be the drainage _ basin for that area has been planned into'. housing. _ If the plans proceed as shown very expensive storm drains from Gleason Road must be installed through Hyde Park property. By removing these apartments from their plans storm drainage can be done through very normal channels which we are ready to work out with the city engineering department. This will reduce the costs to a minimum . A':copy of this report will be sent by registered mail to all persons in authority related to this matter. Presented to the council of the City of Edina June 3rd 1974 by PeK.Peterson and VI.E.Johnston at which time we were informed that 35 feet was the legal net back between single and multiple dwelling buildings in Edina. 0 n O H N P N �O d 4 u _o O'R�' Z Q c O UJI 0 C c to 3mC 1 THE.MINNEAPOLIS STAR Thursday, July 3,1973 �Ic 1 I N 1 M,(d)st" ®`- owners nuvs,& By GWENYTH JONES Supreme Court said today Stuart Corp., which at the time 'the city's tax base. Minneapolis Star Staff Writer l The high court sent back to owned no property within the area. Justice Lawrence Yetka dissent - 1. re- Ramsey District Court a case in, �tition and the ed from the part of the decision re- y It withdrew its p� State law requires the consent of volving the rezoning of an eight- rezoning was later revived on the quiring the consent of property most ro ert owners within an square block area in southwest St. City Council's own initiative. owners. P. P y Paul' which the City Council re- The high court rejected the trial Hr, said the court's interpretation (by rea to be rezoned as well as near - zoned from residential to residen- court's decision that the rezoning of the state law would enable a 1 property owners, the Minnesota tial and commercial in December was actually initiated by Stuart. It group of property owners re defeat 1973. The area in question is said a prior private petition could an overall, comprehensive rezoning bounded by Benson and Youngman not prevent a City ouncil from Plan by refusing to consent a the Avs_.and Rankin and Altori Sts. taking steps to rezone. rezoning of their particular area. 6 boaters reseue�, The high court also overruled the j eterson said this s i t u a t i o n THE IIIGIti COURT said the trial rial court's finding that the rezon- would he covered by a provision in court should decide whether the both the state law and the St. Paul L tog was arbitrary, capricious, dis- i�Ut Sl°aY'C ®L'S city had the necessary written con- t c' iminatory and unreasonable." zoning, ordinance which says thF sent of. two - thirds of the property.)_ , City Council may rezone an area o. . on for 10 others owners both within the area to be IN AN OPINION written by Jus- at least 90 acres without property rezoned and within 100 feet from #ice C. Donald Peterson, the high owners' consent if it finds. by a ; W YORK, N.Y. Im► —Six U.S. e boundary of the area. i. court said the rezoning bore a sin- two- thirds vote that the number of > y a t h t s m e n caught by Tropical czon1.og_.of__the -• arcs; "•in nificant relation to the health and real estate parcels makes obtaining Storm Amy were brought home 'which there are only 72 houses on welfare of the city in that the in- the consent of two- thirds of the safLly by a Soviet cruise ship. The 256 lots, was first propgsed by the creased development would raise owners impractical. ^_--• f1tiord pressed its search of. ;: . Southdale Center Merchants Association �J 10 Southdale — Edina, Minnesota 55435 — Phones 370 -6896 / 370 -6897 July 17, 1975 Warren C. Hyde. Edina City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 Dear Mr. Hyde: I am writing in request of a permit to hold a 23 hour dance -a -thon in Southdale's Garden Court beginning at 4:00 p.m. Saturday, August 9, through 3:00 p.m. Sunday, August 10, 1975. , The four Dale shopping centers in the Twin Cities are sponsoring a promotion called "Setting Free ", in cooperation with the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) to help raise money for Muscular Dystrophy. The Dales are working with the Arthur Murray School of Dance, of the Twin Cities, with sponsored dancer participants. The individuals who wish to dance for Muscular Dystrophy have the responsibility of acquiring a sponsor who agrees to give $2.50 per hour of dancing to Muscular Dystrophy. The merchants of Southdale are cooperating with prize gifts as well as dancer sponsorships and Merchant Association financial support. We hope that our efforts will be profitable for Muscular Dystrophy. On behalf of the Southdale Center.Merchants Association I request a permit, if this is necessary, from the City of Edina for this dance -a -thon. I have already spoken with the City on State rules and regulations in regard to over night dance -a -thons and have met with their approval. Southdale will be working with the Police Department for approval of security guards for this event as well. Most sincerely, Lisa Bonneville Promotion Manager LB /ja CC: Dave Gresham, President Southdale Center Merchants Association 66th Street and France Avenue, Edina. Minnesota American Hardware Mutual Insurance Bldg. Auditorium Wednesday, July 23rd 1975 8:00 - 9:OO pm P R 0 G R A M Welcome Lowell,Kruse, Chairman of the Board, Hennepin County Health Coalition :Introductions John Dizon, Moderator, Member Hennepin County :Health Coalition Education Committee and Director of Health Education, American Cancer - Society Participants # Connie Cobb, Director North Hennepin Human Services Planning I.,-.rd Phil Riveness, Director South Hennepin Human Services Planning Board [dil ;- : , Director West Hennepin Human Services Planning E ^rd Phil Eckert, Planner - Hennepin County Office of Planning& Development City of Edina July 21, 1975 Effective , 1975, the City of Edina will pay 501"S' of the total cost of removing from private property any American Elm tree which is diagnosed by the City Department of Barks and Recreation as being infected with Dutch Elm disease, with a max mu payment by the,City' of $50 per tree. Property owners desiring to be reimbbrsed must have approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation prior to having the tree removed by a private:. contractor. After a tree is removed by a private contractor., the property: 4 oymer shall submit a true copy of the contractor's bill to the City. The City may,,if circumstances permit or require, remove any such trees with its own forces, in which case the City will bill the.property owner for. one —half of labor, equipment and disposal costs min curred by the total City.. If the/cost per tree exceeds $100, the property ow.n er will be responsible for paying all costs over that amount. ,t l 1 % 3 4 i 9 ?� •- l�? T 7 PARK SECTION 1974 PROPOSED TREE DISEASE CONTROL ACTIVITY ELMS - Dutch Elm Disease (D.E.D.) The control program for D.E.D. will consist -of five distinct steps. 1. Survey and visual detection ox 2. Action Initiation ot: 3. Root Graft Control ? 4. Tree Removal o 5. Breeding Site Destruction ox 1. Sprvey and visual- detection. In the detection phase, the City will be carefully surveyed to locate all possible diseased elms. This will require more man - power because of an expected increase in D.E.D. and because the wild areas will be checked more thoroughly. The wild areas will be surveyed at least twice in the spring and at least once in late summer. Developed areas will be surveyed on an intermittent basis between the wild surveys. Visual inspection requires expert diagnosis by trained personnel. 2. Action Initiation. Action initiation means sampling or ax frilling. Sampling or ax frilling will be done immediately after visual detection. Sampling will be carried out on all suspect elms in non -wild areas, whether on public or private property. Ax frilling (girdling the tree - followed by an application of potassium iodide to kill the diseased elm and hasten bark sloughinq) will be used in all public wild areas, and in private gild areas with the agreer;;ent of the property owner. -2- i ' 2. Action Initiation (cont.) Other large elms in the vicinity will also be frilled if they show substantial dead areas which could harbor the beetle. 3. Root Graft Control. Root graft control will be required in all non -wild areas wher, the D.E.D. tree is within 75 feet of another elm. This will be done immediately after the sample is taken. The City will either trench, using a very narrow machine to a depth of 40 inches, or apply a Vapam barrier to isolate the diseased tree from all healthy elms. We will do the work at no cost to the homeowner, provided he signs a release form and agrees to restore his own sawn. This will require the purchase of a narrow trencher and an auger. If the homeowner prefers, he may hire the treatment done at his expense and under our supervision. 4. Tree Removal. Complete tree removal will be practiced for all confirmed D.E.D. elms in non -wild areas. It will occur after the root draft con- trol; in the case of Vapam at least two weeks later. On private property, bids will be secured and the City will pay 50% of the low bid costs with the contractor responsible for destroying the wood. Homeowners cutting their own D.E.D. trees will have wood hauled away by the City at no cost to them. Public non -wild areas will be handled similarly, with our crews rernovinq the trees and burning the wood at selected sites. 5. Breeding Site Destruction. Breeding site'.destruction will be practiced in wild areas. Frilled trees which slough off their bark will be considered destroyed. They will be left standing unless they constitute a safety hazard. If the bark remains tight, the tree will be cut do,;:n and either i r� I -3- 5. Breeding Site Destruction (Cont.). J burned on the site or sprayed with pentachlorophenol in fuel oil. Stumps will also be sprayed, if necessary, to block beetle activity. Dead elm wood breeding sites will, for the most part, be destroyed by the above procedures. Detection and folio. -up personnel will note other dead elm wood: standinq dead elms with tight bark, fire -. wood piles of elm and contractors' brush piles containing elm. The property owner will be required to correct such situations, as several have been required to do in 1973. OAKS Oak Wilt Disease (O.W.D.) This disease requires a similar control program to that for Dutch Elm Disease. However, it spreads more slowly, primarily through root grafts and spore infec- tion to adjacent trees. 1.. Survey and visual detection. i9 s Should be done soon a_fte-r the elm survey. 2. Action Initiation. All visually suspected oak trees must be sampled - with oak wilt con - firmed - before frilling or cutting the tree. To prevent fungus spore formation, recently wilted trees should be treated with potassium iodide - using the ax frilling method. This also will allow the tree to be cut dorm later when manpo% -,er is more readily available and may provide safer firewood. 3. Root Graft Control. Root graft control measures should be done only after confirmation of the sample. The oak root grafts inay be severed by using trenching or Vapam. This should be done halfway between the diseased oak and any adjacent J -4- 3. Root Graft Control (Cont.). healthy oaks within 75 feet. The treatment should be used for all occurrences of Oak.l•lilt - public or private, wild or non -wild areas. On private property, a release agreement would be required from the owner. 4. Tree Removal. Complete tree removal will be practiced for all confirmed Oak Wilt cases in non -wild areas, similar to the procedure for elms. 5. Fungus Spore Prevention. Similar methods to those outlined for breeding site destruction. for elms are expected to be effective. We should check on the best ehemical treatment to prevent spore formation. Avoiding wounds on healthy oaks is important in preventing Oak Wilt. The public can be informed of this so that their pruning is done when the fungus is dormant - December through February. Also, all tools used by the City for sampling should be sterilized after each tree. SUMMARY This 1974 program includes four new items to provide the public with better tree disease control in Bloomington. 1. Frilling and potassium iodide treatment - This provides a control of D.E.D. in wild areas without the accompanying disturbance of previous methods. 2. Root Graft Control - This closes a loophole in the D.E.D. program and is a most important step in stopping Oak l -lilt. 3. Complete Oak ?Jilt Program - It is very important to start this because of the magnitude of the problem and the greater importance of the oak (longer life and greater public esteem than elm). i -5- 4. Adjustment of Cost Sharing to 507, - This will allow the City to spread funds out to offer better total control of D.E:D. and 0J1-D. and encourage greater participation by the homeowner in removing his diseased trees. y 1 1 �1 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON DUTCH ELM AUGUST 1973 In July of 1971 the Council was requested to adopt a policy relative to the eradication and control of Dutch Elm Disease. It was estimated, at that time, that there were between 80,000 and 100,000 elms. The Council at that time adopted a policy whereby the City would pay 75% of the cost incurred for removal of a Dutch Elm Diseased tree from private property, with the owner liable for 25 %. In .February of 1973, the Council approved continuation of the program on the same basis through 1973. In 1971 it was reported that there were three pockets of the Dutch Elm Disease present in the City, - Auto Club Road, Wildwood Road, Timberglade and West 104th Street. A program of sanitation was begun whereby.dead elm wood was cleaned out and destroyed. This program has continued, and in 1972 there were some indications that maybe a partial control of the disease had been accomplished. This was based on the observation that in 1971 positive cases of the disease had been detected in Mounds'Spring Park and Heritage Hills Park. With an increased.activity to remove all diseased trees and clean out dead elm in these areas, no new cases were found in these two areas in 1972. However, in 1973, these observations were proven false. Sixteen positive cases have been found in Mound Springs Park to date in 1973 and four cases in Heritage Hills Park. . . -1- Contrary to the assumption of last year, the disease is spreading within the City. The first reported case was in 1969. We find no cases reported in 1970; undoubtably there were some, but either not detected or recorded, 1971, 51 positive cases of the disease were found; 1972 produced 119 cases and through August 16, of this year 310 cases have been diagnosed as being positive. Of these 310 cases, 157 trees are on private property, 127 on City property (including boulevards) and 26.in the County Hyland Park area. In addition to these, .25 samples were diagnosed as being negative.and one to date has been returned as unidentifiable. In the cases located on private property, some owners choose to q remove and destroy the.tree or trees without City participation., . To date, for example a total of 39 of the 157 on private property have been removed, 17 with City participation and 22 choosing to absorb the total cost; 35 of the 157 have been authorized for removal with owners absorbing the total cost in 10 cases and City participation in 25. 9 cases are now in the process of receiving bids for removal and the remaining 74 cases are in the process of receiving official notification of a positive diagnosis. i i Of the 127 cases located on City owned property 74 as of this date have been removed and destroyed. In these same areas, 12 additional { trees were removed, being suspected of ,having the disease and no sample submitted. As the positive diagnosed trees are removed, all dead elm wood in this area is cleaned up and destroyed. An additional 46 samples are now at the State Laboratory for testing. It is almost certain that.at lease 95% of these will be returned with a positive diagnosis. From comments from the State Laboratory and others, Bloomington has developed a good program, especially in dealing with infected trees on private property. Advances have to be made in an attempted control of the disease on public property. This will require more manpower, equipment and materials as requested in the 1974 budget. However, another thing to bear in mind is that any program that we might develop will not be effective if our neighbors do not formulate a program. From all reports the Dutch Elm Disease began in the southern regions and progressed northward. With this in mind, it will be of little value for us to develop an expanded program of control if our neighbors do not do the same. The State Laboratory reports a total of 66 cases for example in Dakota County, as of August 16. By visual inspection almost this number of cases can be detected on property immediately south of the Minnesota River. Within our own neighborhood, Hennepin County, as of August 16, 705 positive cases have been reported. Of this total, 517 have been reported by the cities of.Minneapolis and Bloomington who both have good detection programs. If effective control of the disease is going to be accomplished, it will have to be on a State wide basis with direction and possibly financial assistance from the.State Legislature. Fortunately for Bloomington, the loss of our elm trees is not as bleak as it may appear. Although it is drastic to lose good healthy trees by the disease, we have other species of trees in sufficient number so that we will not lose all of our green as has been the case in some of the southern states where the elm was the only tree they had. In fact in some of our more dense areas the loss of the elm may be a benefit which will allow some of the other species saplings to grow and flourish.: Of greater concern, I think, should be the Oak Wilt disease which is also prevelant within the City. A wild estimate would indicate that• we have approximately 2,000 oak trees within the City with this disease. An Oak taking longer to develop and grow and being a much more hardy tree, and being less in total number, it's loss will be more greatly noticed. At present we have no program to control this disease. A program to curtail this disease can be much more effective as the disease spread is slower and entirely through root graft. Here again it should be a State wide effort with direction and assistance from the State Legislature. Inter- Office Correspondence DATE January 29, 1975 To` Russ Langseth FROM: Herb Wurdelman SUBJECT: Tree Disease Program The 1974 Park Maintenance Tree Disease Program, basically consisted of five parts: 1. Survey and visual detection, 2. Action initiation. 3. Root graft control, 4. Tree removal 5. Breeding sight destruction. These five steps encompass both the Dutch Elm Diseased trees and those infected ,with Oak Wilt. It is proposed that a similar program be carried out in 1975. 1. SURVEY AND VISUAL DETECTION In this phase of the program 637 trees were sampled in 1974, 506 of which were elms and 131 were oaks. Of these, 413 elm samples were diagnosed by the State Laboratories as being positive and 45 oak samples were diagnosed as positive. In addition 12 elm trees were diagnosed in the field as having the Dutch Elm infection. Samples were taken.from trees on both public and private property, in developed areas and in the wild areas. Two people were used almost full time in this phase of the program. With the assist from C.E.T.A, and E.E.A. Programs it is intended to increase this to three people in 1975. 2. ACTION INITIATION Action initiation, as applied in 1974, meant the actual sampling and axe frilling of the trees. The same people who were employed in the survey and visual detection phase, performed the sampling and frilling. A total of 147 trees were frilled. Frilling is a process whereby the tree is girdled, followed by an application of the cPiemical potassium iodide. This application kills the diseased tree and loosens the bark, thereby making the tree unattractive to the germ carrying beetle. Of the 147 trees treated by this process, 144 trees were elms and 3 were oaks. These trees were chiefly located in wild areas, both on public and private property. Visual field inspections, in the late fall of 1974 indicated the treated trees to be dead and as having considerable loose bark; with indications of the process being a success.in destroying beetle breeding areas, without harm to adjacent trees or undergrowth. It is recommended that this process be continued in 1975. It is proposed that three people, the same as those in step one, be used in this phase of the program in 1975. u. N, � INTER- OFFICE (Cont'd) Tree Disease Program 3. ROOT GRAFT CONTROL This process, in 1974 was used in the non -wild areas and where a diseased tree was detected within 75 feet of an adjacent tree, which from all indications was still healthy. The process consists of either cutting a trench around the infected tree, with a narrow trenching machine, to a depth of approximately 40 inches, or applying a Vapam chemical barrier to isolate the diseased tree from apparently healthy trees, thus preventing the spread of the disease. 13,790 feet of trench was cut in 1974 and 491 feet of Vapam was applied. It was proposed in 1974 that the City purchase a trenching machine. However, after exploration of the various types on the market, it was decided that we use the various types, on a rental basis, to determine the best type for the intended application. Rental fees charged were $975 per month, with a maximum usage being three months; total expenditure being $2,925. In a .months time, with this type of usage, complete chain replacement was necessary and other maintenance needs were apparent. With the cost of the machine being $11,000 plus, and with little apparent usage in the off season, it is recommended that we continue, in 1975, to perform the trenching on a machine rental basis. With added personnel under the E.E.A. and C.E.T.A. fund allpcations, it is intended to increase this phase of the program in 1975. It is recommended that the City again perform this work on both private and public property. Nhen working on private property it is required that the owner sign a damage release. This worked well in 1974; I am only aware of one incident where the owner was unhappy after we completed trenching. This trenching and Vapam barrier application is performed as a service at no cost �. to the property owner. 4. TREE REMOVAL ...In this phase of the activity, complete tree removal is performed, after positive diagnosis is made. The greater share of this work is in the non- wild areas on both public and private property. No removals are made in the wild areas if damage may occur to adjacent trees or undergrowth. When the trees are located on private property the removal is performed by private contractors after receiving bids. In 1974, this removal was performed on a cost sharing basis, with the City paying 50% of the cost and the property owner 50 %. The contractor being responsible for the disposal of the wood. There are instances when the owner chooses to remove the trees. This is allowed, providing removal and wood disposal is done properly and according to regulations. The cost to the City for its' participation in 1974 was $6,288.75 which is an average of $27.22 per tree. This for 215 D.E.D. removals and 16 oak wilt removals, on 80 separate pieces of property. In two instances the owners pled hardship and were unable to pay their 50% portion. In these two cases we proceeded as allowed by Ordinance. The trees were removed at City expense with recovery to be made by assessment. INTER- OFFICE (Cont'd) Tree Disease Program From all indications, this phase is a good part of the program and contributes greatly to the disease control. If we are to continue in 1975 on the same basis as 1974, it will require Council action to authorize the 50% cost' participation. The activity budget is based on this participation. Council action is necessary as the resolution passed in 1971 allows for a 25% participation by the City in 1975. 5. BREEDING SITE DESTRUCTION In 1974, breeding site destruction was accomplished in the wild areas by frilling, causing bark sloughing and the tree considered destroyed. Unless they pose a hazard, they will be left standing. If the trees do not slough their bark, and those requiring to be cut down due to the safety hazard were either burned on site or sprayed with penta- chlorophenal in fuel oil which will destroy the beetle breeding habitat. Some wood piles containing elm, with bark intact, were discovered. In these cases owners were instructed to either dispose of the wood or debark it as Provided by regulations. We anticipate this same procedure in 1975 with a step up in the inspection and search for possible breeding sites. This we can accomplish by acquiring personnel-.under the C.E.T.A. fund allocation. To summarize, since 1969 when the first case Bloomington, programs to control the disease the number of cases diagnosed as positive is decrease as to the number of cases diagnosed history of D.E.D. in Bloomington as recorded 1969 1970 1971 Positive cases: 1. No Report 51 of D.E.D. was detected in have been stepped up. While greater in 1974, there is a as compared to 1973. The since 1969 is as follows: 1972 1973 1974 119 310 413 This shows an increas -e of 191 cases (61.6°0) between 1972 -73 and an increase of 103 (24.9 %) cases from 1973 to 1974. In 1973 activities to control the disease were greatly stepped up, both'in the detection and diseased tree removals. This activity was again increased in 1974, with a full time crew assigned totally to detection and control programs during the summer months. With the percentage of increases as shown we might be seeing an indication of success of our program. Consequently we are planning an increased program in the Tree Disease Activity in 1975 and would recommend that the Council authorize the 50% cost participation for diseased tree removals from private properties. With this we would hope to see indications of further successes at the end of the 1975 season. We undoubtedly will see an increase in the number of Oak wilt cases as 1974 was the first year of a concentrated effort to detect and locate the presence of the disease. It is expected that more cases will be found in 1975 as efforts to locate and diagnose Oak wilt are increased. The State laboratory had problems in diagnosing Oak wilt samples in 1974. It is anticipated that this will be rectified in 1975, hence, it is expected that we will experience a substantial increase in the number of Oak wilt cases in 1975. I / L I N c` V F < � H t CL z -� 001n) > CAHILL I o, ! •: '� o ELEM SCHOtJL�� Y . a C 1: 1 J / z I T q - a j Q w E Y HILL RD. D. z )° o i i jo.. in REQUEsT N1151BER : S -75-6 N of Kemrich Dr., S of Lee Val] LOCATION: Cr., and E of Fleetwood Drive. REQUEST: 17 lot single family subdivision. '[ij1nnnlra d�irtmeng a � ♦•ilIeze of P.d9ttly S -75 -6 M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills .3rd Addition. Generally located north of Kemrich Drive, south of Lee Valley Circle, and east of Fleetwood Drive. Attached: copy of.preliminary plat and subdivision dedication report. The proponents are requesting a 17 lot single family home subdivision; the .average lot sizes in which are 16,570 square feet. The majority of the lots are about 14, 0,00 square feet. A generalized plan of this. subdivision was .presented:tothe Planning - Commission at the time of the original M. P. Johnson's platting. Since that time one additional subdivision has been.approved in conformance with that preliminary plan. This proposal is in conformance with the original plan for the area. The developers are proposing to dedicate one acre or about 11.5 percent of -their property for park purposes. This property is joined on the south and west by existing parkland Csee attached subdivision dedication report). Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The lot sizes are in conformance with the lot sizes in adjacent subdivisions. 2. The proposal is in conformance with the original plan submitted. This recommendation is contingent on the submittal.-Of a developer's agreement satisfactory to the Engineering Department, prior to final plat approval. .GL.:.ln 5/22/75 . 1 I \ - .. M. R I �P R-0 S P E C i I . I L �t I -- �' i• l' Y I fj s� t•.t �Y rL sS d. JOHNSONIS - -- HILLS 3RD ADD'. PRELIMINARY i PLAT LEGAL, OUTLOT A , M.P. JOHNSON'S PROSPECT HILLS 2NO ADD. DEVELOPER: BARRON 81 ASSOCIATES INC. 9001 W. BLOOMINGTOf4 FREEWAY • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 PHONE — 884 -2400 PLANNING BY: HEDLUND ENGINEERING SERVICES 4818 OVERLOOK LAKE CIRCLE BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PHONE — 888 -2080 I " ° I o d TOTAL AREA .............. 379,400 sq.ft NO. OF LOTS •••• t7 AVG. LOT AREA • ••.•.•••• 16,570 aq ft. AREA OF STREETS •••..•53,920 so ft. AREA OF PARK ... .••••• 43,750 sq.ft. or 11.5% Total MIN. SETBACK .. ....... 30 feet MIN. SIDEYARD ........... 10 feet .3, sic. aCt I i ~! ' • � � `��1 � 1. ,_� ,, � I ' � a �Stinr_ i i =,fID O />:f I I IS L•h7 A /Lr I I+ �I n Subdivision No. SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT T0: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FRO14: Planning Department SUBDIVISION NAME: AA .. P. ZAi Sa-oS iR'�5. Cc�� �i`IS 3". AJdf >, LAND VALUE: $ by: date: 50 The developer of this subdivision has been required to Q A. _grant an easement over part of the land XB. dedicate % of the land C. donate:$ as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying.the following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent •to :an existing .park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acres or will-be combined with future dedications so that the end result "will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. E] 3. If property abuts a natural lake, '.pond,, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will'be dredged or otherwise improved and will be a scenic place. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. F1 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other,instances:than above. F 2. e MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF - THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1975 EDINA CITY HALL Members Present: W. W. Lewis, Chairman, S. P. :Hughes,-G. V. Johnson, C. E. Johnson., D. T. Runyan, and R. E. Kremer. Staff Present: G. Luce, City Planner, R. C. Dunn, City Engineer, and L. Nye, Secretary. I. Approval of the April 30, 1975, Planning Commission Minutes. A motion to approve the April 30,:1975, Planning Commission minutes as written and submitted was made by Mr. Hughes and seconded by Mr. G. Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. II. SUBDIVISIONS: S -75 -6 M . P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition. Generally located north Kemrich Drive, south of Lee Valley Circle, and east of Fleetwood Drive. Mr. Luce recalled a preliminary subdivision plan for the area was submitted several years ago, and the proposed 1.7 lot plat is similar to that preliminary plan. He recalled that when the land directly south was recently subdivided (M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 2nd Addition), Lanham Lane was extended north of Kemrich Drive; the proposed subdivision would further extend Lanham Lane to connect the existing north and south sections of that road. Mr. Luce noted the average lot size would be 16,570 square feet, and a 70 foot wide strip of land along the eastern property line would be dedicated for park ,purposes to join with the park strip donated when M. P. Johnson's Prospect.Hills 2nd Addition was platted. Approval of the pre.liminary.plat was recommended because the lot sizes are in conformance with those in adjacent subdivisions and because the proposal is in conformance with the original subdivision plan .submitted. . After brief discussion, Mr. Runyan moved the proposed subdivision of M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition be approved pursuant to the staff's recommenda- -tion, provided a developer's agreement satisfactory to the Engineering Department is 'su'bmitted''prior to final plat -approval.. -Mr. C. Joh'n's'o'n 'seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. S -75 -7 Warden Acres - Austin Replat. Generally located south of Grove Street .and east of Johnson Dri -ve. Mr. Luce stated the requested seven lot subdivision. proposes a future loop road along the south boundary of lots 36 and 37, Warden Acres; a 30 foot right of ti..ay for the north half of that road i.s incl,uded in the plat. He recalled that when a similar subdivision received preliminary plat approval from the City Council in 1973, a written opi -nion from the City Attorney recommended that proposed lots 4' -and 5 be combined and platted as one lot because lot 5 would not have direct access to a public street until and unless. the proposed loop road were constructed. Mr. Luce stated that approval of the requested subdivision is recommended with the following modifications and contingencies: 1. the staff would concur with the 'City Attorney's opinion and would require that the south half of the property located east of i0ak :Lane b.e.;platt.ed.as one lot rather than two; 2. further, an easement shou =ld be dedi -cated and a temporary cul -de -sac constructed at the south end Addition ", and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting or .,une io, 170a, And is hereby granted preliminary approval, subject to the dedication of Outlot A for park Purposes and subject, also, to the cash dedication of 5 %:of the value* of the raw.land. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded. by Councilman Shaw and on roll ,call there were four ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted. (/ M. P. JOHNSON'S PROSPECT HILLS 3RD ADDITION GRANTED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as.to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition, advising -that this seventeen lot, single family subdivision is located North of. Kemrich.Drive, South of Lee Valley Circle and East of Fleetwood Drive. Ile pre- sented a graphic which showed a 70 foot dedication along the Easterly line of the. property for park land. No objections were heard. Councilman Courtney then off- ered the following resolution and moved its adoption: •s 6/16/75 RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT OF M. P. JOHNSON'S PROSPECT HILLS THIRD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat known as M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hi11s Third Addition, platted by t d at the Edina Council Meeting of June 16, 1975, be u and M. P. Johnson, and presen e is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Richards and on rollcall there were four ayes and no nays and the resolution.was adopted. WARDEN ACRES - AUSTIN REPLAT GRANTED PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented Warden Acres - Austin Replat for preliminary approval, advising that, in conformance with the recommendation of Mr. Erickson in a letter dated March 29, 1973, the lots on the South road easement have been eliminated. Mr. Luce pointed out that this plat, which is located South of Grove Street and East of Johnson Drive,, has been approved by the Planning Commission,.with the understanding that a temporary cul -de -sac be dedicated and constructed as part of the development of the property I nd that a 5% cash donation be made in lieu of park land dedication. The resident at 5506 Benton Ave. objected that the marshy area would be destroyed and that he would lose his privacy if the property is platted as proposed. Mr. Hyde recalled that one of the reasons the proposed right -of -way was shown was that when this plat was orig- inally proposed, some of the neighbors wanted the easement to allow for future development of their lots. Residents were assured that the lot on the Oak Lane easement could not be divided at a later.date without Council action. Mr. R. V. Barthelemy, 5500 Benton Ave., said that he would have no objection to the plat as now proposed. Councilman Richards then offered the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to the recommendations of the Planning Commission: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT WARDEN ACRES - AUSTIN REPLAT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that that certain plat known as Warden Acres - Austin Replat, platted by Curtis E. Austin and Valborg J. Austin, husband and wife, and presented at the Edina Council Meeting of June 16, 1975, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval, with the understanding that a temporary cul -de -sac be dedicated and constructed as part of the develop - ment of the property and that a 5% cash donation. be made in lieu of park land dedi- cation. Mntinn for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Councilman Courtney and on. rti w LOCATION MAP j J- I I I I - AR T19 YI:Y J i C MC CAULEY TRAIL WFgT CROSSVIEW t�UTHERANCHURCH 1,ON: HI LS J�p PQQ �y / CIRC '6 W �H -HIL S i � O Q � i E Subdivi'sibn REQUEST NUMBER: S -74 -9 Between McCauley Trail & Arrowhei LOCAT[ON:Lake, N of Margaret's Lane & S o: McCauley Circle. REQUEST: Three lot single family subdivision yAagP pianniLIC depErtment villjtce of edinm 74 -9 McCauley Heights 5th Add_tion, Gen. alv located beti•rcen M CauleY Trail Pc, , and Armethea? Lake, north of Margaret's Lane anti south of IicCau].e-� C�r��.e, 1.1_x. Lu^ts presented the proposed subdivision of three _lots and one outlot, and recommended denial because the deadend private access drives planned ;could be inconven- ient and poten•::ial.ly dangerous for safety and service vehicles and the general public, a nuisance `!o the adjoining residents could result because the proposed 1iomes. would be diff icult to loca•ta, and acceptable- maintenance standards may L be dif'fici ! t so a uture demand for the city to assume those services could result. lie recommended the private road concept no-� be allczred, and presented an alternative plat which included pW)lic access but created a more detrimental environmental impact. 'Mr„ Tom I�McCaulev, the proponent, recalled a three lot plat with a_ private road was approved several years ago; the present owners of those lots enjoy their privacy and wit` not allow that private drive to be extended as a public road,, He pointed out that when •the proposed outlot is eventually platted, all of'the lots would have Public access . rom fMcCaulev Trail. A public road, through the .property i n ques-e J on would destroy the existing steep hill. Following discussion, Mr. I'Iughes moved the requested subdivision be continued to the July Pl.anni:zg Commission agenda so the Planning, Commission members and staff -L: can view. the praperty. tie requested accurate and more detaileA graphics be provided. k 5 S -711 -9 NcCaule c- (Tau:n Q south c ip,hts 5th Addition. Gen aulev Circle. cited between llargaret's Lane and fir. Luce stated the proponent has requested consideration of the proposed plat of "McCauley heights 5th Addition" be postponed to the next Planning Commission agenda, No action -taken. III. SUBDIVISIONS: iS -74m9 11ccaulev Heights 5th Addition. Generally locate, between 1icCaulev Trail and Arr:;:ahead Lake,, - north Lane and south of ficCaure_,* _Circle, COIir:C ?iuE i0 OCr03I:R 2, TP?0 Ho.act on taken. (The October Planning. Commission :Meeting schedule appeared later on the agenda, and the October 2nd meeting was postponed ,to October 161, 1974.) �l -7/ l.(�. McCauley Heights 5th Addition; Generally located between McCauley Trail and Arrowhead Lake, north of ►iari;aret's• Lane and south of McCauley Circle Continued from 9 -4 -74� Mr. Luce recalled the proposed subdivision was origi.nallI discussed several months ago when the proponents.reque.sted approval of additional lots-on an existing private road, The plat hasbeen revis.ed.since then and now.includes a public road along, the north property line and a cul =de -sac; if approved, the road must have a 50 foot right of way with 30 feet paved, and the cul-de-sac must have a 45 foot radius right of way with 35 feet.paved. In addition, an existing sewer line must he relocated, and the road grades should he amended to provide a platform and clear view at the intersection of McCauley Trail and the proposed road, fir. Luce observed that significant environmental damage to the property will result because of the necessary sewer relocation, the lot locations, and the street location and grades. lie concluded that although the proposed plat meets the minimum standards and subdivision requirements in that area, it does not significantly exceed those requirements. If approved, approval should be contingent on receipt of a cash parkland dedication fee of So of the raw land value. Lengthy discussion followed regarding the possibility of narrowing, the proposed road and future subdivision of the proposed outlot versus platting the entire property at the present tine., fir, Kremer moved the preliminary plat of McCauley Heights 5th Addition he approved with the road and grade modifications noted by the staff, contingent on a 5" cash,parkland dedication fee and provided any future platting of the proposed outlot conforms to the preliminary subdivision presented.. fir., Runyan seconded the motion, All voted aye. notion carried, conform to the restrictions of the aistrlCt in WniCn.it is locatea. ir the z use of a building or portion thereof is changed from a nonconforming to a conforming use, such building or portion thereof may not again be used for a nonconforming use. _ (e) Expansion or Change of Nonconforming Use.- The nonconforming use of a part of a building, or of land, shall n of be expanded or extended to any other portion of such building or land, nor changed to any other nonconforming use." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its pass - a e and publication. MC CAULEY HEIGHTS ' ST. H. ADDITION _GRANTED 'PRELITMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented McCauley'Heights 5th Addition for preliminary plat approval as recommended by the Planning Commission subject to the following contingencies: 1. Widening of the proposed new road and cul -de -sac by five feet; 2. The intersection with McCauley Trail be clear- viewed as this road meets McCauley Trail on a bend.. Mr. Thomas McCauley objected that widening the road would damage too many trees and requested that the road be constructed at the width proposed on the plat. Mr. Dunn said that if a 26 foot roadway would be adequate for the Victorsen plat with 25 lots, it should be wide enough for this five lot plat. He added that a full 70 foot travaled.circle is..necessary..for snow plowing. "Councilwciaan Schmidt then .offared the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 5TH ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by 'the .Edina 'City Council that that certain plat entitled "McCauley Heights 5th Addition", platted by Betty J. McCauley, and presented at the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval subject to the - following conditions: 21. Re intersection with McCauley Trail be clear - viewed; 3: Re roadwa` saa,�gs'lneubla fUl ave foet �c a Loo €i i nf= f -wa Motion for adoptionyox ne reso ution wasaseconde' by Counci m n Sriaw a 3 on rollcall there were five ayes and no nays and the resolution was adopted. CHRISTINE MANOR PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 2, 1974. Affidavits of Notice were presented by ;Clerk., approved as to form and ordered placed on file. Mr. Luce presented Christine Manor, located generally at the Southeast corner of Interlachen Boulevard and Schaefer Road for preliminary plat approval, recalling that Council had determined no moratorium existed on building in this area. Dr. Ralph H. Boos,. 5000 So. Blake Road, objected to the plat, expressing concern for the orderly development of the area. Councilman Shaw retailed that the Planning Departr•.�nt had suggested an East /Test division of lots which sug- gestion was not accented by the developer. Following some discussion, Council- man Courtney's motion continuing the matter to December 2, 1974, to give the residents in the arza an opportunity to work with the Planning Department on long range plans for the area was seconded by Councilman Shaw and carried. i-ir. B. B. Nelson, Jr., 5008 Schaefer Road, expressed his concern for granting a road easement thru this ,plat. HEN174-PIN COUNTY LIBRARY APPEAL OF BOARD OF APPEALS AND ADJUSTrENTS SIGN DECISION DEi`IED. Affidavits of .Notice were presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed on file.. Mr.. Luce presented the appeal by Hennepin County from the decision of the Board of .Appeals and Adjustments denying approval of vari- ances for: 1. A 10 foot high exterior sign with two foot modular panels to be installed at the location of the existing sign at the Edina Community Library at 4701 td. 50th Street; 2. A 15 foot high exterior sign with three foot modular panels to be installed at the V. 70th Street parking lot entrance of the Southdale- .Hennepin Area ,Library; 3. A 10 foot high exterior .s.ign with two foot modular panels to be installed at the York Avenue pa•r.king 'lot entrance of the Southdale- Hennepin Area Library. D 0 11"10N MAP LOCY " -1 ' n vi w a \ LIN z °c CL 0-1 L /(^�`�� /•�� CAHILL a �0 40 0 SCHobL Y $ LLL UJ N V T_ r a a a ZQ 1 ' V) 0- a I Q w HI D z Lu iY •z i 1 • 1 o i g i T i O O 0 i�31";.-,Con �a I i i REQUEST NUMBER: S -75 -6 N of Kemrich Dr., S of Lee Val] LOCATION: Cr., and .E of Fleetwood Drive. REQUEST: 17 lot single family subdivision. XDINA'PLANNI'NG COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 28, 1975 S -75 -6 M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition. Generally located north of Kemrich Drive, south of Lee Valley Circle, and east of Fleetwood Drive. Attached: copy of _preliminary °plat -and subdivision dedication report. The proponents are requesting a 17 lot single family home subdivision, the average lot sizes in which are 16,570 square feet. The majority of the lots are about 14,000 square feet. A generalized plan of this subdivision was presented to the Planning Commission at the time of the original M. P. Johnson's platting. Since that time one additional subdivision has been approved in conformance with that preliminary plan. This proposal is in conformance with the original plan for.the area. The developers are proposing to dedicate one acre or about 11.5 percent of their property for park purposes. This property is joined on the south and west by existing parkland (see attached subdivision dedication report). Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the proposed subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The lot sizes are in conformance with the lot sizes in adjacent subdivisions. 2. The proposal is in conformance with the original plan submitted. This recommendation is contingent on the submittal of a developer's agreement satisfactory to the Engineering Department, prior to final plat approval. GL:ln 5/22./75 14 1 0. lL IA, 14 M. R P R-0 S P E C T MSS 1336 133.6 c 7 10 4'lZ f, 1336 1 60 1 1336 70 Fil 19A 7 th rL f Z:% 00t J 0 H N S 0 N I's H I L L S 3RD A D D-. PRELIMINARY PLAT LEGAL, OUTLOT A , M.P. JOHNSON'S PROSPECT HILLS 2ND ADD. DEVELOPER: BARRON 8 ASSOCIATES INC. 9001 W. BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 PHONE — 884-2400 PLANNING BY: HEDLUND ENGINEERING SERVICES 4818 OVERLOOK LAKE CIRCLE BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PHONE — 888-2080 10 0, TOTAL AREA .............. 379,400 sq.ft NO. OF LOTS ...... ...... 17 AVG. LOT AREA ............ 16,5 7 0 s q. fl. AREA OF STREETS ...... 53,920 sq. ft. AREA OF PARK•• ...... 43,750 sq. ft. or 11.5% Torol MIN. SETBACK . .......... 30 feet MIN. SIDEYARD ........... 10 feet all, -110 — 9 972— Z 2 S. k"' V ossa,-r- 3 074 —123- '2 4 1 a. +:s) 2 rr 203.t °1S? J ; 7 70 13315 i il 5 0 2 1336 133 6 6 2 0 i .3 i b7: 036 7 4 low 1336 8 5 f 2 f MD 1 1336 1 1 6 0 0 z z o o 9 14,n:3 alp I 7 th rL f Z:% 00t J 0 H N S 0 N I's H I L L S 3RD A D D-. PRELIMINARY PLAT LEGAL, OUTLOT A , M.P. JOHNSON'S PROSPECT HILLS 2ND ADD. DEVELOPER: BARRON 8 ASSOCIATES INC. 9001 W. BLOOMINGTON FREEWAY • BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431 PHONE — 884-2400 PLANNING BY: HEDLUND ENGINEERING SERVICES 4818 OVERLOOK LAKE CIRCLE BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55437 PHONE — 888-2080 10 0, TOTAL AREA .............. 379,400 sq.ft NO. OF LOTS ...... ...... 17 AVG. LOT AREA ............ 16,5 7 0 s q. fl. AREA OF STREETS ...... 53,920 sq. ft. AREA OF PARK•• ...... 43,750 sq. ft. or 11.5% Torol MIN. SETBACK . .......... 30 feet MIN. SIDEYARD ........... 10 feet Subdivision Jto. 7J — C0 SUBDIVISION.DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department ��((°° tt II r SUBDIVISION NAME: AA . P. ZAA;ScsA) S PV. 9S HillS LAND VALUE: $ by: date: 50 =$ The developer of this.subdivision has been required to E] A. grant an easement over part of the land XB- dedicate '6 of the land a C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land as a result of applying the.following policy: A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition +� beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6, acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will.be a minimum of a 6 acre park. 3. If - property abuts "a natural lake, pond, or stream. �.4. If property is necessary for storm water holding and will be dredged or othengise- improved and will be a scenic place. 5. If the property ,is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic. value. F1 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. 2. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD WEDNESDAY, MAY 28, 1975 EDINA CITY HALL Members Present: W. W. Lewis, Chairman, S. P. Hughes, G. V. Johnson,. C.. E. Johnson, D. T. Runyan, and R. E. Kremer. Staff Present: G. Luce, City Planner, R. C. Dunn, City Engineer, and L. Nye, Secretary. I. Approval of the April 30, 1975, Planning Commission. Minutes. A motion to approve the April 30, 1975, Planning Commission minutes as written and submitted was made by Mr. Hughes and seconded by Mr. G. Johnson. All voted aye. Motion carried. II. SUBDIVISIONS: M. P. Johnson's Pros of Kemric Drive. t Hills 3rd Addition. Generally located north Drive, south of Lee Valley Circle, and east of Fleetwood Mr. Luce recalled a preliminary subdivision plan for the area was submitted several years ago, and the proposed 17 lot plat is similar to that preliminary plan. He recalled that when the 1-and directly south was recently subdivided (M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 2nd Addition), Lanham Lane was extended north of Kemrich Drive; the proposed subdivision would further extend Lanham Lane to connect the existing north and south sections of that road. Mr. Luce noted the average lot size would be 16,570 square feet, and a 70 foot wide strip of land along the eastern property line would be dedicated for park purposes to join with the park strip donated when M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 2nd Addition was platted. Approval. of the preliminary plat was recommended because the lot sizes are in conformance with those.in adjacent subdivisions and because the proposal is in conformance with the original subdivision plan submitted. After brief discussion, Mr. Runyan moved the proposed subdivision of M. P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition be approved pursuant to the staff's recommenda- tion, provided a developer's agreement satisfactory to the Engineering Department is submitted prior to final plat approval. Mr. C. Johnson seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. S -75 -7 Warden Acres - Austin Replat. Generally located south of Grove Street and east of Johnson Drive. Mr. Luce stated the requested seven lot subdivision proposes a future loop road along the south boundary of lots 36 and 37, Warden Acres; a 30 foot right o.f way for the north half of that road is included in the plat. He recalled that when a similar subdivision received preliminary plat approval from the City Council in 1973, a written opinion from the City Attorney recommended that proposed lots 4 and 5 be combined and platted as one lot because lot 5 would not have direct access to a public street until and unless the proposed loop road were constructed. Mr. Luce stated that approval of the requested subdivision is recommended with the following modifications and contingencies: 1. the staff would concur with the City Attorney's opinion and would require that the south half of the property located east of Oak Lane be platted as one lot rather than two; 2. further, an easement should be dedicated and a temporary cul -de -sac constructed at the south end 6 21 2 0.6 4 1 5.3 6 7.2 5- 4.6.753.39 '4 • Denotes Low Bid TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS- 322,.323 &'324 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT NOS. WM -292, 293, P -294 & WM -295 STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -144' GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -117 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -205 & 207 & Part 208 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NOS. S -11, 12 & 13 CONTRACT-NO, 75 -4 (ENG) PROPOSALS A.B,C.D.E.F,G,H, BIDS OPENED JULY 18, 1975 BIDDER PROPOSAL A & B PROPOSALS C, D & E PROPOSALS F, H & I PROPOSAL G GRAND TOTAL Bury & Carlson, Inc. $474,744.04 $130,592.50 M. G. Astleford Co., Inc. -510,538:72 Minnesota Valley Surfacing 529,362.94 Fischer Sand & Aggregate, Inc. 534,218.71 $- 71,555.70 $106,044.20 Shafer Contracting Co., Inc. 577,280.46 Concrete Curb Co. .w $119,602.05 Arnold Beckman, Inc. 143,756.22 Victor Carlson & Son, Inc. 145,177.00 0. R. S. Construction, Inc. $ 62,120.64 $120,749.50 G. L. Contracting, Inc. 65,862.02 102,804.97 Metro Sewer & Water Co. 74,039.07 111,177.11 Dean Luxenburg Construction 78,403.32 Rauenhorst Construction Co. t 84,597.25 $ 741,063.98 Engineer's - Estimate $489,061.85 $158,158.75 1 $ 64,957.20 $ 80,301.50 1 $792,479.30 „T TABULATION OF BIDS (CONTINUED) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NOS. SS -322, 323 & 324 WATER MAIN IMPROVEMENT,NOS. WM -292, 293, P -294 & WM -295 STORM SZWE R IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -144 GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -117 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -205 & 207 & Part 208 SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NOS. S-11, 12 & 13 CONTRACT NO. 75 -4 (ENG) PROPOSALS A, B, CD, E, F, G, H, I .BIDS OPENED JULY 18, 1975 LOCATIONS PROPOSAL A ! PERMANENT STREET SURFACING, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -205 West 78th Street from Cahill Road to 3300' West PROPOSAL B PERMANENT STREET SURFACING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. :BA -207 Grove Street from Johnson Drive to Tracy Avenue PROPOSAL C CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -11 North side West 70th Street from Cornelia Drive Easterly to Valley View Road PROPOSAL D CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -12 Both sides York Avenue from W. 69th Street to W. 74th Street PROPOSAL E CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -13 Both sides Hazelton Road from France.Avenue to York Avenue i TABULATION OF BIDS (CONTINUED) LOCATIONS (CONTINUED) - PROPOSAL F SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -.323 Parkwood Lane from North,line Parkwood Knolls 19th. Addition . to -170' North WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -293 Parkwood Lane from North line Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition to Parkwood Road (Nos. 5500, 5504 & 5509) PROPOSAL H SANITARY SEWER 'IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -324 Lanham Lane from South line M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to Fleetwood Drive WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -295 Lanham Lane from South line M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to Fleetwood Drive STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -144 Lanham Lane from South line M.P. Johnson's Prospect Hills 3rd Addition to 300'. North GRADING GRAVELING AND BITUMINOUS STREET SURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -208 Lanham Lane from South line M.P. Johnson's Prospect 'Hills 3rd Addition to Fleetwood Drive PROPOSAL I VATERMAIN EXTENSION IMPROVEMENT NO. P -VIM -294 ;Doncaster Way from Croyden Lane to Ayrshire Blvd. PROPOSAL G SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO, SS -322 Dovre Drive from Lincoln Drive to West.line Parkwood Knolls 19th'Addition r r - TABULATION OF BIDS (CONTINUED) LOCATIONS (CONTINUED) PROPOSAL G (CONTINUED) MATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -292 Dore Drive from Lincoln Drive to West line Parkwood Knolls 19th Addition GRADING, GRAVELING. CREEK CROSSING AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. C -117 Dovre Drive from Parkwood_Lane to Lincoln.Drive i . W. E. JOHNSTON 5836 Queen Ave. So. Minneapolis, Minn. 55410 Area Code 612- 922 -0770 .July 79 1975 Mr. James Van Valkenburg Mayor of the City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Van Valkenburg: Enclosed are copies of the presentation of Hyde Park Development company to the City Council June 3rd, 1974, and a copy of a recent decision of the state Supreme Court related to the same subject. We expect that Edina and other municipalities will review_ their zoning decisions relative to the "necessary written consent of two - thirds of the property owners both within the area to be rezoned and within.100 feet from the boundary of the area.," Please inform us by registered mail of any and all meetings to be held concerning this matter. It is fortunate that there has been no construction on the building sites contiguous to Hyde Park by the owners of Braemar Hills 7th Addition. With best regards, I remain Sincerely; `. E..Johnston, Secretary Hyde,Park Development Co. Copies to: P. K. Peterson Mel Astleford Warren Hyde Tom Erickson Jack Smuckler Gordon Schuster W. W. Lewis t 0 N P N ' .O m THE MINNEAPOLIS STAR Thursday, July 3, 1973 �k ty 0,V t ro er .... �"�' ��. iii. By GWENYTH JONES Supreme Court said toda� Stuart Corp., which at the time 'the city's tai: base. Minneapolis Star Staff Writer ,! The high court sent back to owned no property within the area. Justice Lawrence Yetka dissent- e , ed' from the art of the decision re- Ramsey Ramsey District Court a case in It withdrew its petition and the P ZO in •State law requires the consent of volving the rezoning of an eight- rezoning was later revived on the quiring the consent of property square-block area in southwest St. - owners. '• N most property owners within an q City Council's own initiative. , Z ,Q � � Paul' .which the City Council re- The high court rejected the trial He said the court's interpretation = e area to be rezoned as well as near- zoned from residential to residen- court's decision that the rezoning of the state law would enable a v j by property owners, the Minnesota teal and commercial in December was actually initiated by Stuart. It group of property owners to defeat 1973. The area in question is said a prior private petition could an overall, comprehensive rezoning $ bounded by Benson and Youngman not prevent a City Council from Plan by refusing to consent to the tti „ rezoning; of their particular area. Avs...and Rankin and AILonSts. taking steps to rezone. Peterson said this s i t u a t i o n 3 6 boaters rescued, The high court also overruled the THE HIGH COURT said the trial , would he covered by a provision in rial court's finding that the rcron- court should decide whether the "arbitrary, p both the state law and the St: Paul ing was ca capricious, dis- but search goes city had the necessary written con - cYiminatory and unreasonable." zoning ordinance which says the sent of two- thirds of the property _l.• , t City Council may rezone an area of on for 10 others owners both within the' area to be IN AN OPINION written by Jus- at least 40. acres without property rezoned and within 100 feet from tice C. Donald Peterson, the high owners' consent if it finds. by a NEW YORK, N.Y. tll'� —Six U.S. `t a boundary of the area. —,-.,`court said the rezoning bore a sig- two- thirds vote that the runber of y a;c h t s m e n caught by Tropical eznniztg. ,of_ -the • are!;-'In nificant relation to the health and real estate parcels makes obtaining Storm Amy were brought home which there are only 72 houses on welfare of the city in that the in- the consent of two- thirds of the sally by a Soviet cruise ship. The 256 lots, was first proposed by the' creased development would raise owners impractical. nressed its search of. - This relates to Hyde Park and Hyde Park Znd Addition as they relate to the subjects of storm sewer drains and to the relationship of multiple dwelling apartments called town houses. Upon study of the plans for Braemar Hills 7th Addition we fine that six of their proposed units are approximately 50 _ feet from the south boundryso o of which Is zoned single family and p single family in 1971 by a special hearing concerning this �A no officer of Hyde Park Development Company was ever notified of any hearings concerning The Braemar Hills 7ths j plans we must presume that the errors involved in letting plans be completed with only 50,not 200 fee=t, between the. single family area and the multiple family.areajwere those of the planning and engineering departments. Surely no member of the planning commission or the city council would have let this mistake go as far as it has had .they ^been \Rro_perly informed., But the error can be corrected as no buildings have been . ._ started in that immediatenadreroceedPas plannedof buildings from the plan a P We are not and have not been opposed to Braemar Hills 7th addition for town houses . We cannot, however, approve of ap- s ti ^eats as close as the homes. The area ho approval family lots:..and eventual ho In this matter must be followed. — The driveway of the nearest bulldin;c is ten feet from our,-..--. - - - property line and the most distant dimension is .10.0. feet., _ 116 units are planne& in an area of 1 and2 acres,- This oversight was found by our.engineers on the plat seen -� in one of the utility company offices. Since then severe' attempts have Been made to contact officers of Braemar Hills 7th through their local architects office. The office of Relocation Realty of Milwaukee was called twice with assurance from them that the engineer in charge would contact us. There has .been no reply. The stacking or packing of these apartments into otherwise green area of the property has brought about-serious relations beticeen Hyde Park Development company and the city planning department, The land that would normally be the drainage- basin for that area has been planned into housing. If the plans proceed as shown very expensive storm drains from Gleason Road must be installed through Hyde Park property. By removing these apartments from their plans storm drainage can be done through very normal channels which we are ready to work out with the city engineering department. This will reduce the costs to a minimum. 1.::copy of this report will be sento registered mail to all persons in authority related Presented to the council of the City of Edina June 3rd 1974 by P:K.Peterson and W.E.Johnston at which time we were informed that 35 feet was the legal set back between single and multiple dwelling buildings in Edina. City of Edina July zl, 1975 Effective , 1975, the City of Edina will pay 501'?a of the total cost of removing from private property any American Elm tree which is diagnosed by the City Department of Barks and Recreation as being infected with Dutch Elm disease, with a payment by the.City of $50 per tree. Property owners desiring to be reimbArsed must have approval from the Director of Parks and Recreation prior to having the tree removed by a private contractor. After a tree is removed by a private contractors the property. owner shall submit a true copy of the contractor's bill to the City. The City may,-if circumstances permit or require, remove any such trees with its own forces,'in which case the City will bill the property owner for one —half of labor, equipment and disposal costs m'incurred by the total City.. If the/cost per tree exceeds $100, the property owner will be responsible for paying all costs over that amount. 9 Southdale Center Merchants Association 10 Southdale —Edina, Minnesota 55435 —Phones 370 - 6896/ 370 -6897 July 17, 1975 Warren C. Hyde Edina City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55423 Dear Mr. Hyde: I am writing in request of a permit to hold a 23 hour dance -a -thon in Southdale's Garden Court beginning at 4:00 p.m. Saturday, August 9, - through 3:00 p.m. Sunday, August 10, 1975. , i The four Dale shopping centers in the Twin Cities are sponsoring a promotion called "Setting Free ", in cooperation with the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) to help raise money for Muscular Dystrophy. The Dales are working with the Arthur Murray School of Dance, of the Twin Cities, with sponsored dancer participants. The individuals who wish to dance for Muscular Dystrophy have the responsibility of acquiring a sponsor who agrees to give $2.50 per hour of dancing to Muscular Dystrophy. The merchants of Southdale are cooperating with prize gifts as well as dancer sponsorships and Merchant Association financial support. We hope that our efforts will be profitable for Muscular Dystrophy.. On behalf of the Southdale Center Merchants Association I request a permit, if this is necessary, from the City of Edina for this dance -a -thon. I have already spoken with the City on State rules and regulations in regard to over night dance -a -thons and have met with their approval. Southdale will be working with the Police Department for approval of security guards for this event as well. Most sincerely, Lisa Bonneville Promotion Manager LB /ja CC: Dave Gresham, President Southdale Center Merchants Association 66th Street and France Avenue. Edina. Minnesota