HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-09-08_COUNCIL MEETING- 4
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 8, 1975
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES: of August-4 and 18, 1975, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of
seconded by
I. PRESENTATION OF 1976 BUDGET
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Analysis of Assessment by City Manager. Spectators heard. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by,Resolution Ordering Assessment. 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote to pass.
A. .Street Improvement A -173 - Valley View Road for Southdale Office Center
B. Street Improvement A -174 - W. 56th St. from Bernard Place to Dale Ave.
C. Street Improvement B -82 - 4379 Coolidge Ave.
D. Street Improvement BA -182 - Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Rd. to South
line of Hyde Park
E. Street Improvement BA -191 - Tara Road from Kemrich Dr. North to cul -de -sac
F. Street Improvement-BA-198 - Brookview Ave. from W. 58th St. South and West
to W. 59th St. cul -de -sac
G. Street Improvement C -115 - Olinger Blvd. from Olinger Rd. to County Rd. 158
H. Street Improvement E -29 - Creek Valley Rd. cul-de-sac at East side of Edina-
West School Property
I. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -264 -A - W. 78th St. between Cahill Rd. and
Cecelia Circle
J. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -309 — Brookside Terrace from Motor St. to 675'
South
K. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -313 - W. 65th St. West of France Ave.
Correcting flowage Easterly from `Barrie Road to Xerxes Ave'.
L. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -314 - W. 78th St. from 1140' West to Cahill .
Road West to South�City Limits
M. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -315 - Gleason Road from South line of Hyde
Park Addition to W. 78th Street
N. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -317 - Easement line in Mirror Lake Plat No. 3
to serve property South of Mirror Lake Plat No. 2
0. Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -134 - Monroe Ave
P. Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -137 - Gleason Road North of W. 78th Street
W. 78th St. from Gleason Road to Marth Road
Q. Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -139 - Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to
900 feet, South of South line of Hyde Park Drive
R. Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -141 - Across France Ave. South of W. 44th St.
From alley between Sunnyside Road and W. 44th St.
S. Watermain Improvement W-288 - W..78th St. from Glasgow Dr. to South City
Limits - Gleason Road from W. 78th St.-to S. line of Hyde Park Addition
T. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS -321 - 6021 Vernon Ave.
U. Watermain Improvement WM -291.- 6021 Vernon Ave.
V. Sanitary Sewer Improvement SS 7-316 - Lanham Lane.North of Kemrich Dr.
W. Storm Sewer Improvement ST.S -136 - Lanham Lane North of Kemrich Drive
X. Watermain Improvement WM -289 - .Lanham Lane North of Kemrich Dr.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON,P.ROPOSED IMPROVEMENT Presentation by Manager.:and Engineer.
Spectators Beard. If.'Council wishes to proceed, action by. Resolution Ordering
Improvement. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Street Improvement No...BA -210 - Townes Road from W. 48th St. North (Continued
from 8/18/75)
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading requires offering of
Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to.pass Second - Reading or if
Second Reading should be waived.
A. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 811 -A64 - Erection of Signs to Designate Proposed
Rezonings and Plats
2. Ordinance No.,811 -A65 - W. 8 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Vic Adams Addition -
3945 W. 49th St. - R -1 Residential District to R -2 Multiple Residence
District
3. Ordinance No. 811 -A66 - Minimum Building Size in Commercial District
September 8, 1975, Agenda
-Page Two
o�
V. PUBLIC HEARING ON CLARIFICATION OF DENSITIES IN PLAN AREAS Presentation by
Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action
by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass - Restraining Order.- 9/5/75
VI. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Minneapolis Tenant's Union
B. John Kyllo - Reimbursement for WM -212
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
1. Final Plat Approval
eat iI HMI * htM- h10Addition - S -74 -9
2. t ivisions
a. Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Third Addition (6422 -24 Vernon Ave.)
LD -75 -8 (9/3/75)
b. Lots 5 and 6, Gunnar Johnson's Second Rearrangement of Rolling.
Green (5808 Mait.Lane) LD -75 -9 (9/3/75)
3. Set Hearing Dates
a. Rezoning - City of Edina for Darrel A. Farr Development Corp.
(Roushar Square) Generally located East of County Road 18, North of
the Edina West condominiums and.South of Fabri -Tek - PRD -3 Planned
Residential District to R -1 Single Family Residence District
b. Flood Plain Permit - 6836 Sally Lane
B.' Bond Issue= Land Acquisition
'C. Assessed Valuation Public Hearing - Plat 78125, Parcel 3600 (7300 -7350 York)
D. -Suit - Lawrence Gold
E. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities - Study Committees
F. Appeal of Unemployment Compensation Award - B. C. Rodger `
G. Police Department Salary Resolution
H. Ad Hoc Committee - Public Health
I. Iron Removal Plant #2 Backwash
J. Notice of Claim - Robert Schmitt
K. Offer to Buy Old Grimes House
M. Decision on 1975 People Making - Human Relations Commission
VIII. ORDINANCES 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading.
A. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 451 -A3 - Signs to Designate Proposed Rezonings and Plats
2. Ordinance No. 801 -A10 - Signs to Designate Proposed Rezonings and Plats
IX. RESOLUTIONS
A. Quit Claim Deed - Outlot 2, Overholt Hills Georgia and Outlot A, Overholt
Hills Georgia 2nd Addition
B. First John Philip Sousa Memorial Band
X. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
XI. FINANCE
A. 10 Foot Underbody Blades '
B. Transfer of Park Funds (Continued from 6/2/75)
C. Liquor Fund as of June 30, 1975
D. Surplus and Reserves as of December 31, 1974
E. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for
payment.of the following claims as per Pre -List dated September 8, 1975
General and Revenue Sharing, $94,395.31; Construction $10,401.45; Park
Funds, $28,875.80; Water Fund, $20,796.78; Liquor Fund, .$42,136.72; Sewer Fund,
$56,711.24; Improvements, $1,316.69; Total, $254,633.99; and for confirmation
of payment of the following claims: General Fund, $217,752.59; Construction
Fund, $24.37; Park Funds, .$5,407.17; Water Fund, $1,629.80; Liquor Fund,
$99,933.34; Advance Funding Highway Bond Fund, $197,941.67; Total,
$522,688.94
F. Purchase of Whiteman Property
DORSEY, MAP OUART, .WINDHORS.T, WEST a HALLADAY
DONALD WEST RAYMOND A REI5TER - 2400 F I R S T NATIO N A L BANK g U I L CI I N G JOHN W. WIRDHORST, JR. DOUGLAS D. HcFARLAND
WALGO E MAROUART JOHN J. TAYLOR . . _ MICHAEL PpICHARO .DAVID L SOENNEN
JOHN W,WINDHORST - BERNARD G, HCIRZE14 - WILLIAM R. SOTH ALAN D', GILLILAND
HENgqY HALCAOAY WILLIAM J. KEMPEI. M I'N N E A P O L S, MINNESOTA 5 5 4 0 2 THOMAS R. MAMTHEY LAWRENCE R. OLIVER . -
JULX M. MANNAFORD JOHN S. HIBBS - - " - RICHARD. G, SWANSON - FRANK H: VOIGT .-
ARTHUR B. WHITNEY - ROBERT 0. ROTTEN FAITH L OHMAN WILLIAM E. MARTIN
RUSSELL W. UNDOUIST JOHN .0..LEVINE - - ( 612! 340-2600 - DAVID A. RANHEIM . WILLIAM H, HIPPEE, JR.
DAVID R. BRINK ROBERT J. STRUYK •'CABLE: DOROW ROBERT J. SILVERMAN STEPHEN O. SHANK _
HORACE HITCH - MICHAEL A OLSON - - _ WILLIAM fl. HIBBS ROBERT A. BURNS
VIRG14 M. HILL LARRY W; JOHNSON - TE:LTiX ;29 0605 - JOHN D. KIRBY TONI A. SEITZ
ROBERT V. TARBOX THOMAS S. MAY TELECOPIER:(612) 340 -2868 PHILIP F SOELTER MICHEL ALAFONO
ROBERT J.JOHNSON G. LARRY GRIFFITH WILLIAM S. PAYNE BRADFORD LFERGUSON
M.B. HASSELOUIST ERAIG A BECK JAN STUURMANS ROGER J. MAGNUSON -
POODORSEY DAVIDi CU$KEY - 1468 W-FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING - - A.A.SCKWARTZBAUER J.ROBERTHIBBS
GEORGE P. FLANNERY. THOMAS O.NOE ST RAUL,'MINNESOTA 65101 DAVID KFRONEK -
-
CURTISLROY - JAMES H. dHAGAN (612) 227 -8017 THOMAS TIRKHAM . -.
ARTHUR E. WEISBERG _ JOHN M. MASON - - JON F. TUTTLE _
DUANE E.JOSEPH MICHAEL W. WRIGHT ROBERT A HEIBERG `
FREOERICF E. LANGE LARRY LVICKREY EMERY W. BARTLE -
JAMES B.VESSEY LOREN R. KNOTT JONATHAN VILLAGE CENTER MICHAEL J. HOMER
WILLIAM A WHITLOCK PHILLIRKMARTIN CFIASKA,MINN E.SOTA' 65316 CURTIS L STINE -
E.J.BCHWARTZDAUER REESE C. JOHNSON (612) 448 -4012 MICHAEL TRUCANO
THOMAS M; BROWN CHARLES J. HAUENSTEIN _ - - WILLIAM J. KEPPEL OF COUNSEL
CORNELIUS D. MAHONEY CHARLES A. GEER _ JAMES A. FLADER DAVID E. BRONSON
THOMAS S. ERICKSON JOHN C. ZWAKMAN - 115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST WILLIAM A JOHNSTONE LEAVITT R. BARKER
WILL C: BABCOCK JOHN RWICKS ROCI•JESTER, MIN NESOTA 68901 _ WILLAA LBOWEN GEORGE I- ANDERSON
MCHAEL E. BRESS EUGENE LJQHNSON 1$67) 288-3156 WILLIAM P. LUTHER' ROBERT L VANFOSSEN
August 28, 1975
kSr. warren C. Hyde
Edina City Manager
4801 West .50th Street .
Edina, Minneeota.55424 -
Re:' Outlot 2, Overholt Hills Georgia Additions
-Outlot- A; Overholt Hills Georgia 2nd Addition-
Dear Warren:
The City of.Edina• presently owns street and.'ptiblic utility._ease-
gents over Outlot "2', Overholt Hills GeorgiA Addition (being the same aa.
Shawnee Circle),.and Outlot A,'Overholt dills Georgia 2nd Addition (being'
the same as Overholt kass) . The owner of those properties, the North
wreatera National Bank of Piinneapolis, has tendered a quit claim heed conveying
the fee title of.those two outlots to the City. Does t_he City wish to-accept ..
this deed? It merely conveys the fee interest in what are public streets
but'in which Edina presently owns only an easement.
If the -City wishes'to accept the deed, It should be done by Council
resolution. I suggest this patter be placed on the agenda for the next
Counci.1 meeting.;
Very truly yours,
TSE /abc Th mss ' ric :.
cc: Ms. Florence Hallberg
RESOLUTION
BE', IT, RESOLVE the'Ediva City Council does hereby authorize
sponsorship of The First John Philip Sousa Memorial Bank by the
City of Edina Park and Recreat<o_n Department thereby designat-
inf, The First John Philip Sousa Memorial Band as a civic, non-
profit organization.
ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1975.
STATE OF 11INNESOTA )
COUNTY OF IIE�NPIEPI'_d) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERIC
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting ,City Cleric for the
City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and fore, ^,oing
resolution was duly-adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of September 8, 1975, and.as recorded in the
Minutes of said Regular Meeting. -
WITNESS.my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of September,
1975.
City Cleric _
A RESOLUTION -
Presented to the Edina City Council
8 September 1975
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council
does hereby authorize sponsorship of
The First John Philip Sousa Memorial Band
by the City of Edina Park and Recreation
Department thereby designating The First
John Philip Sousa Memorial Band as a civic, '
non - profit organization.
Submitted by
J 0-0 u�
c9
(612) 296 -7238
September 4, 1975
The Honorable James Van Valkenburg, Mayor
City Hall
4801 West.-50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: NPDES PERMIT r- M0046124
Municipal Water Treatment Plant #2
Dear Mayor Van Valkenburg:
This letter is to remind you of the requirements of the
NPDES Permit, Part I -D -1, which requires the permittee to
complete a preliminary engineering report for the connection to the
municipal sanitary sewer of the filter backwash from the
above-referenced facility by September 3Q, 1975.
The required information and notice of compliance or non-
compliance as per Part I- D- 2.9hould be addressed to
Chief, Compliance G Enforcement Section
Division of Water Quality.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road 82
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
if you have any questions, please let us know.
Yours very truly,
Pat Mader
Compliance & Enforcement Section
Division of Water Quality
.cc: Edina City Council,,c%o Clerk
EXCERPT OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
. SEPTEMBER 8,'1975
1975 POLICE, DEPARTMENT SALARY RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Mr. Hyde advised Council that
agreement still.has not been reached on the wording of the Police Department Labor
Contract, but recommended that the Salary Resolution be adopted with the under -
standing that the checks can be issued retroactively after the contract has been
agreed.upon. Councilman Courtney thereupon offered the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SCHEDULE OF
MAXIMUM WAGE-RATES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL
BE IT RESOLVED
that the City
Manager be
authorized to impliment the
following
maximum wage rates
for the Police
Department
personnel
for the year
1975 as soon as
a master agreement
has been
signed between
M.A.M.A. and
Local 320 as
follows:
-- —POSITION-- -____
PRESENT
1974
PROPOSED.- 1975
.__July. -Dec.
Bi- .
(Annual)
Bi -Wk.
`Bi -Wk.
(Annual) �—
Patrolman
- - *First — yeas --
__387
427:20-
437.8
*1 year service
432.92
(11,256)
477.03
488.96
(12,558)
, *2 year service
456.92
(11,880)
503.48
516.07
(13,254)
*3 year service
478.62
(12,444)
527.39
540.57
(13,883)
*4_year service
502.62
(1.3,068)
_553.85
567.70
(-14,580)
Detective
--_- "_ - -- First year _ _____542-77
--
- _0
4,112)
553.85
_ -_
- 585.86.. (14,816) ^ — --
1 year service
550.62
(14,316)
553.85
594.36
(14,927)
' 2 yea_ r service
558.00
(14,508)__.
_553.85
602.31
(15,030)
*The employee shall
receive
an additional
$45.00 per month
for performing
fire- - - -- -
___ fighting duties
which. may be
assigned by
the City.
iiii
IIIIJ
August 29, 1975
league of minnesota municipalities
Th : Municipal Clerks and Managers
FROM: Stan Peskar; General Counsel
RE: "Fair Share Fees"
Judge Crane Winton of the Minnesota Fourth Judicial District on August 13, 1975, ruled
in the case of Robbinsdale.Education Association v. Robbinsdale Federation of Teachers
that the collection of Fair Share Fees pursuant to Ennesota tatutes l T 5, subd.
is unconstitutional. The court found that the procedure mandated by the statute, which
involves no notice or opportunity to be heard,for non - union members prior to the ded-
uction of the fair share fee, is a denial of due process of law. As such the political
subdivision is without authority to collect the fee pursuant to the procedure outlined
in M.S. 179.65; subd. 2.. This case has not yet been appealed, but it could be as the
30 day appeal period has not run. However, in another case, Sundell v. Ind. School
District. #283; the union has appealed on the narrow issue of whether the granting o
a temporary injunction restraining the collection of fees was .proper. The Supreme Court
will not necessarily reach the broad constitutional question on this appeal. This means
that another case may have to be appealed to get such a broad determination. Addition-
ally; the court will not, in all likelihood, reach the issue of who is liable for the
repayment of fair share fees collected, should the statute be found unconstitutional.
Given this distinct possibility that important issues may not be addressed in the near
future by the courts, municipalities currently collecting fees seem to be faced with-.
three alternatives:
1. Continue to collect the fees and transmit them to unions;
2. Refuse to collect the money whatsoever;
3. Collect the money and escrow the funds awaiting a Supreme Court ruling on the
constitutionality of the statute.
Of these three it seems that the third option listed above would be the best course for
municipalities to follow because:
1. Choice of the first option could possibly expose the municipality to unnecessary
liability for illegally collected fees should the Minnesota Supreme Court decide the
fair share fee check off is unconstitutional. If the city has been collecting the
money and paying it to the union, they are exposing themselves to suit by the employ-
ees for return_of.the fees.. While,it seems unquestioned that-.the,-municipality would
have a cause ofl action against -the union for any fees it,was forced-to pay_to employ-
ees in siich�a suit, it seems.pointless : to expose -the municipality to unnecessary
litigation to get the money from the union, or face out of pocket loss in the case of
union insolvency.
(over)
300 hanover building, 460 cedar street,' saint paul, minnesota 55101 C61 21 '222 -2e61
IM
2. Refusal to collect the money entirely would expose the municipality to suit by
the unions and cause possible hardship for municipal employees forced to contribute
"fair share fees" in a lump sum. Furthermore, it could expose the city to the'finanm
cial shock of making the required payments to the union out of its own funds, should
the law be upheld in the higher court. The union might also attempt to compel at
least collection and escrowing of the money pending a ruling on the question. (This
was the order,in a similar Minnesota district court suit by 46 school districts.)
If a municipality wants to refuse to collect entirely, it would seem best to get a
court determination as to the legality of that action.
3. The final alternative of continuing to collect the money but escrowing the funds
provides the least exposure to risk, while at the same time denying what seems uncon-
stitutionally collected monies to the union. As the municipality is collecting the
fees although not transmitting them to the union, it seems unlikely that a judge would
order the collection and transmittal until a determination of the constitutionality
is made-by the -: Supreme Court. The escrowing of funds seems likely to be the course
followed by many courts. Additionally, on a final determination by the Supreme Court
of the issue of constitutionality, with the money in escrow it would be easy for the
municipality to take.the appropriate course of action with little expense to itself
or its employees*
********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
*Funds deposited in escrow accounts should be- earning a reasonable amount of interest.
Upon the final determination it seems that a court might well award interest along with
either the transmittal to the union or return to the employee.
********** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
In addition to consideration of the collection of the fees municipal officials currently
negotiating contracts with employees should strike any language in regard to fair share
fees from master contracts. If the law is found unconstitutional, the employer is in
the awkward position of trying to extricate itself from an illegal obligation or of
providing hearing or other safeguards to make the deduction constitutional. On the other
hand, if the law is found constitutional, the union will be able to enforce its provisions
even without appropriate contract language.
SGP:GCH:pjr
ji,�VILLAGE OF EDINA ' REQUISITION NO. D
PURCHASE REQUISITION
---------------- - - - - -1 DATE G 0 19�
DELIVER MATERIAL T0:
;MATERIAL :NEEDED .BY.: ?,...NUMBER 1159
SUGGESTED `SCURGE OR
USUAL SOURCE:
QUAN
mv
DESCRIPTION
PREPARED BY:
T ..
APPROVED BY:s,.c- / v
DEPART;iENT .HEAD
UNIT
PRICE
AMOUNT (CHARGE
ACCT.
o-- � l9ia.7 --? o
DO NOT MARK IN THIS SPACF
RECEIVED August 2219 75
APPROVED
PURCHASING`; DEPT.
j nd .
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Due from Other Funds
Loan to Other Funds
Accrued Interest
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Mix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies Inventory
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
JUNE 30, 1975
ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS AT COST:
Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Leasehold Improvements
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization
Construction in Progress
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Payroll
SURPLUS: .
Invested in Fixed Assets
Unappropriated
r'
77 C
$340,941.64
3,500.00 $ 344,441.64
18,775.00
415,000.00
9,390.00
$587,842.63
173,829.84
8.68 761,681.15
$ 2,425.30
400.00. 2,825.30
$1,552,113.09..
$151,448.85
$ 21,644.06
455,911.08
145,264.59
3,035.55
$625,855.28
172,933.40 452,921.88
$604,370.73
3,482.92 607,853.65
TOTAL ASSETS $2,159,966.74
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
$ 160,728.11
5,363.66
$ 166,091.77
$ 607,853.65
1,386,021.32 1,993,874.97
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,159L966. 74
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
OPERATING EXPENSES:$
Selling
Overhead
Administrative
34,089.93
6,592.50
20,724.69
$
32,660.00
13,770.93
222289.25
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
26,345.63
10,818.64
19,759.21
$
93,095.56
31,182.07
62,773.15
$
31,144
9,917
14,213
$
28,6.57
10,841
14,394
$
22,079.
9,790
12,531
$
- 81,880
30,548
41,138
CITY OF
EDINA
4,003.00
2,929.93
7,895.25
$
4,266.63
1,028.64
7,228.21
$
11,215.56
634.07
21,635.15
TOTAL OPERATING$
61,407.12
$
68,720.18
$
56,923.48
Six months Ending
June 30,
1975 and
June 30,1974
$
53,892
$
44,400
$
153,566
$
6,133.12 $
14,828.18
1975
12,523.48
$
33,484.78
1974
INCREASE- DECREASE*
_
50th St.
Yorkdole-
Grandview
Total 50th St.
Southdole
Grandview
Total
50th St.
Yorkdo4e
Grandview
Total
SALES:
NET OPERATIN5
34,825.70
$
92,837.49
$
38,378.94
$
166,042.13
$
43,414
$
94,502
Liquor
$358,899.13
$
534,051.80
$370,952.85
$1,263,903.78
$355,006
$468,254
$327,002
$1,150,262
$ 3,893.13
$ 65,797.80
$
43,950.85
$113,641.78
Wine
103,506.98
174,425.91
103,452,48
381,385.37
98,753
150,869
81,769
331,391
4,753.98
23,556.91
21,683.48
49,994.37
Beer
134 310.99
181 945.93
104 312.20
420 569.12
113,475
145,258
84,251.
342 984
20 835.99
36 687.93
$.
20 061.20
77 585.12
Mix and Miscellaneous
12,207.79
2,532
17,499.72
12,575.62
42,283.13
11,370
13,835
10,509
35,714
837.79
3,664.72
Cash Discount
Cash over or under
2,066.62
6,569.13
$608,924.89
$
907,923.36
$591,293.15
$2,108,141.40
$578,604
$778,216.
$503,531
$1,860,351
$30,320.89
$129,707.36
$
87,762.15,$247,790.40
62.18 **
Less bottle refunds
10,499.98
14,124.89
9,845.50
34,470.37
9,336
11,739
9,208
30,283
1,163.98
2,385.89
637.50
.4,187.37
NET SALES
$598,424.91
$
893,798.47
$581,447.65
$2,073,671.03
$569.268
$766,477
094,323
$1,830,068
$29,156.91
$127,321.47
$
87,124.65
$243,603.03
COST OF SALES:
Inventory - January
0191,471.96
$
210,403.16
$218,397.83
$ 620,272.95
$1830230
$202,960
$165,390
$ 551,580
$ 8,241.96
7,443.16
778
53,007.83
68,692.95
Purchases
531,438.32
797,402.00
533,146.00
1,861,986.32
504,626
672,076
450,623
1,627,325
26,812.32
125,326.00
19,723.59
82,523:00
234,661.32
$
$722,910.28
$1,007,805.16
$751,543.83
$2,482,259.27
$687,856
$875,036
$616,013
$2,178,905
$35,054.28
$132,769.16
.$135,530.83
$303,354.27
Inventory June30
225,564.36
265,398.60
761,681.15
217,276
256,953
203,362
677,591
3,442.19
18,611.36
62,036.60
84,090.15
_220,718.19
$502 192.09
$
732,240.80
$486,145.23
$1,720,578.12
$470,580
$618,083
$412,651
$1,501,314
$31,612.09
$114',157.80
$
73,494.23
$219,264.12
GROSS PROFI
96,232.82 $
161,557.67
$ 95,302.42
$ 353,092.91
$ 98,688
$148,394
$ 81,672
$ 328,754
$ 2,455.18 *$ 13,163.67
$
13,630.42
$ 24,338.91
OPERATING EXPENSES:$
Selling
Overhead
Administrative
34,089.93
6,592.50
20,724.69
$
32,660.00
13,770.93
222289.25
$
26,345.63
10,818.64
19,759.21
$
93,095.56
31,182.07
62,773.15
$
31,144
9,917
14,213
$
28,6.57
10,841
14,394
$
22,079.
9,790
12,531
$
- 81,880
30,548
41,138
$
2,945.93 $
3,324.50*
6,511.69
4,003.00
2,929.93
7,895.25
$
4,266.63
1,028.64
7,228.21
$
11,215.56
634.07
21,635.15
TOTAL OPERATING$
61,407.12
$
68,720.18
$
56,923.48
$
187,050.78
$
55,274
$
53,892
$
44,400
$
153,566
$
6,133.12 $
14,828.18
$
12,523.48
$
33,484.78
EXPENSES
_
NET OPERATIN5
34,825.70
$
92,837.49
$
38,378.94
$
166,042.13
$
43,414
$
94,502
$
37,272
$
175,188
$
8,588.30*$
1,664.51*
$
1,106.94
$
9,145.87*
PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
$
2,306.25
$
3,809.04
$
3,190.20
$
9,305.49
$.
2,698
$
3,606
$
2,532
$
8,836
$
391.75*$
203.04
$
658.20
$
469.49
Cash Discount
Cash over or under
.48*
63.18*
110.16
46.50
43
1*
110
152
43.48*
62.18 **
.16
105.50*
Income on investments
9,390.00
9,390.00
3,478
3,478
5,912.00
5,912.00
Other
981.60
981.60
778
778
203.60
203.60
$
12.677.37
$
3.745.86
$
3,300.36
$
19,723.59
$
6,997
$
3,605
$
2,642
$
13,244
$
5,680.37 $
140.86
$
658.36.$
6,479.59
NET INCOME$ 47,503.07 $ 96,583.35 $ 41,679.30 $ 185,765.72 $ 50,411 $ 98,107 $ 39,914 $ 188,432 $ 2,907.93 *$ 1,523.65* $ 1,765.30 $ 21666.28*
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross pro`it
16.08%
18.07%
16.39%
17.03%
17.34%
19.36%
16.52%
17.96%
Operating expenses
10.26
7.69
9.79
9.02
9.71
7.03
8.98
8.39
Operating profit
5.82%
10.38%
6.60%
8.01%
7.63%
12.33%
7.54%
9.57%
Other income
2.12
.42
.57
.95
1.23
.47
.53
.72
NET INCOME
7.94%
10.80%
7.17%
8.96%
8.86%
12.80%
8.07%
10.29%
1975 POLICE DEPARTMENT SALARY RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Mr. Hyde
advised Council that
agreement still has not been
reached on the wording of the
be
Police Department Labor
with the under -
Contract, but recommended that the Salary Resolution adopted
the can be issued retroactively after
the contract has been
standing that checks
agreed upon. Councilman Courtney thereupon offered the following
resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE SCHEDULE
OF
MAXIMUM WAGE
RATES FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL
BE IT RESOLVED that the City
Manager be authorized to impliment the
following
maximum wage rates for the Police
Department personnel for
the year
1975 as soon as --
a master agreement has been
signed between M.A.M.A..and Local 320 as
follows:
POSITION PRESENT -
1974 PROPOSED - 1975
Jan. -June.
July -Dec.
Bi -Wk.
(Annual) Bi -Wk.
Bi -Wk.
(Annual)
Patrolman
*First year 387.69
(10,080) 427.20
437.88
(11,246)
fl year service 432.92
(11,256) 477.03
488.96
(12,558)
*2 year service 456.92
(11,880) 503.48
516.07
(13,254)
*3 year service 478.62
(12,444) 527.39
540.57
(13,883)
*4 year service 502.62
(13,068) 553.85
567.70
(14,580)
Detective
542.77
(14,112) 553.85
'
585.86
(14,816)
First year
550.62
(14,316) 553.85
594.36
(14,927)
1 year.service
558.00
(14,508) 553.85
602.31
(15,030)
2 year service
*The employee shall receive
an additional $45.00 per month
for performing fire-
fighting duties which may be assigned by the City.
E9��r r
41k;j)w 2 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
MUCP
0612) 296 -7238
September 4, 1975
The Honorable James Van Valkenburg, Mayor
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
RE: NPDES PERMIT MN0046124
Municipal Water Treatment Plant #2
Dear Mayor Van Valkenburg:
This letter is to remind you of the requirements of the
NPDES Permit, Part I -D -1, which requires the permittee to
complete a preliminary engineering report for the connection to the
municipal sanitary sewer of the filter backwash from the
above - referenced facility by September 30, 1975.
The required information and notice of compliance or non-
compliance as per Part I -D -2 should be addressed to:
Chief, Compliance & Enforcement Section
Division of Water Quality
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
1935 West County Road B2
Roseville, Minnesota 55113
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Y )Uj rs very truly,
M�"
Pat Mader
Compliance & Enforcement Section
Division of Water Quality
cc: Edina City Council, c/o Clerk
1935 West County Road B2, Roseville, Minnesota 55113
Regional Offices • Duluth/ Brainerd / Fergus Falls/ Marshall / Rochester/ Roseville
Equal Opportunity Employer
South Hennepin Human Services Council
6401 France Avenue South • Edina, Minnesota 55435
Phone 920.1194 ` •` r
Serving:
Bloomington
Eden Prairie
Edina
Richfield
August 22, 1975
Mr. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
Village of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minn. 55424..
Dear Mr. Hyde:
Hennepin County has requested the assistance of the SHHSC in
selecting a South Hennepin representative to the Ad Hoc Public
Health Committee they are -now eve loping.
The Hennepin County Health and Social Services Advisory Board
has recommended that the representative chosen be either an
elected municipal official or a city manager /deputy city manager,
but Dot a health professional.
The Advisory Board is especially concerned that the person selected
be presentative of the South Hennepin area, knowledgeable about
the municipal attitudes toward the delivery of public health
services and in some accountable to the four cities..,
One vehicle for the selection of a South Hennepin representative .
would be for each city to recommend an interested individual to the
South Hennepin Human Services Council. The SHHSC would then take
responsibility for selecting the most appropriate representative
and would also serve as a vehicle for transmitting information
from the Ad Hoc Public Health Committee back to the four cities.
It is anticipated that the Ad Hoc Public Health Committee will
meet twice a month and the Committee members will determine the
meeting time.
Page 2 (Cont.) Mr. Hyde
If you feel the selection process I have outlined is appropriate
I would appreciate if your Council would take action on a nominee
by September 10th.-
It would also be helpful if a brief description of your nominee's
interest in public health could be provided.
Enclosed is a copy of the charge to the Ad Hoc Public Health
Services Committee, an organizational chart of the Health and
Social Services Advisory Board, and the recommended composition
of the committee.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Phillip J. Riveness
Executive Director
PJR:jh
Encl:
Hennepin County Health and Social
�-- • Services'Advisory Board
Recommendations for Membership on the Ad Hoc Public
Health Services Committee.
Committee members:
Jacqueline Thompson, Chairperson
Joel.
Winkler
Mary
Lange
Mike
Dwyer.
Total Membership:
13 members
Composition:
(1)
-Chairperson - Health and Social Services Advisory Board
(2)
Private Hennepin County Agencies
Hennepin County Medical Society
* Community Health and L•!elfare Council
(5)
Effected Municipal Officials.
* City of'Minneapolis (2)
* South Hennepin Area (1)
* West Hennepin Area (1)
* Northwest Hennepin Area (1)
Municipalities- in the three suburban areas would be
requested to select one e4etted official to 'represent
their geographic area on the committee.
(5)
Consumers
The consumers would be selected by a random sampling
procedure developed and implemented by OPD staff. A
screening process to determine whether the individual
qualifies, according to the legal definition of consumer,
and has the interest and commitment to participate on
the committee would be included in the selection procedures.
13
Total Membership
Orientation:
An orientation program would be planned and conducted
for the Ad Hoc Public Health Services Committee.
April 14, 1975
I - W-
LOCATION
IM
�
../ •
11510
lot division
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -8
LOCATION: 6422 -24 Vernon Avenue
REQUEST: Division of existing
double bungalow .into two single
family attached units.
village Rjanning department villwQe of edills
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT .
September 3, 1975
LD -75 -8 David J. DeMarsh. Lot 3,. Block 1, Gleason Third
Addition. 6422 -24 Vernon Avenue.
.Refer to: Attached survey.
The proponent is requesting to divide an existing, constructed
double bungalow down the party wall into two single .family
attached units. The Planning Commission may recall that this
has been done several times.in the recent past and has in fact
been done on adjacent lots
The staff would recommend approval of'the requested lot division
as this is in line with city policy and the utility connections
are already separated.
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND'SURVEYORS
6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343
CRITIFICATS OF SURVEY
Survey For: t�Sl r- Z) az—
/ Book .304 Page 1_
i
V\
Description: v
That part of Lot
3, Block 1, Gleason
Third Addition lying
Northeasterly of a
line described as
follows: Beginning at
a point on the north- -
westerly line of Lot 3, a
distance of 50.23 feet
Southwesterly from the most
�dr_zr-therly .corner thereof;
thence Southeasterly to a
point on the Southeasterly
line of Lot 3, a distance of
50.23 feet S0uthc.est (->r1,' from
the +m7st °Ec sterly corner. thereof.
'S
s
'o
o�
o i �
0
9,
�ccale I "=�0'
I hereby eerllfy. that this is -a true.and correct ropresonfotion of a curvy of the boundaries of -
{ Mannopin Clountyr Minnewou and of the location f oil buFdings thoroon, and oll
riciblo encroachments, if any, f rota or on said land. Surroyed by me this day of 4 1ti
�j.
CARDARELLE d, A350CIATES, IkC.
9 -3 -75 Planning Commission.Minutes
LD -75 -8 David J..DeMarsh. Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Third Addition.
6422 -24 Vernon Avenue..
Mr. Luce explained the proponent is requesting to divide an
existing double bungalow along the common wall. He recommended
approval, as the request .is in line with city policy allowing the
division of double bungalows for ownership purposes if.there are
separate .sewer and water connections.
Pars. McDonald moved the requested division be approved as
recommended, and Mr. Dean seconded the motion ... All voted aye.
Motion carried.
a �l
t �� A
9
�I
01M.151W -1
I ot d i v l �ayl it
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -9
LOCATION: 5808 Tait Lane
REQUEST: Rearrange two lots to face
in north /south direction rather than
in present east /west direction-
i
village Nanning c! rtintnt vilixge of edina
11.IL� �3�
lJ N T
.�.,,..
-
b-
• n •i
I ot d i v l �ayl it
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -9
LOCATION: 5808 Tait Lane
REQUEST: Rearrange two lots to face
in north /south direction rather than
in present east /west direction-
i
village Nanning c! rtintnt vilixge of edina
11.IL� �3�
EDINA PLANNING CO`MISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 3, 1975
.LD -75 -9 Volney T. DeRemer. Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Gunnar
Johnson's Rearrangement of Rolling Green. 5808 Mait
Lane.
Refer to: The attached survey.
The proponents are requesting a lot division so as to rearrange
two lots which now face in an east /west direction; if the
division is approved, the lots would face in a north /south
direction.
As shown on the attached survey, a house exists on the larger
parcel and an adequate lot size is retained for that existing
dwelling unit. -
Recommendation: The staff would recommend approval of the
proposed division as there are no additional buildable lots being
created, and the existing services are Adequate for this
rearrangement.
GL:ln
8/29/75
D R IV E
O,
92.S1e "12.01 p•ZZ 5q'}i•
�A
^v; y S
e .�
PROPC)SED
Vo1"ey T. Cc mac•• c�
CARDARELLE c4c..E�SSOCIAT�
L A N D S U R V E Y O R S
6440 Flying cloud Orire, Eden Prairie Mlnnesote, 55341 Phone
Scale -
Revisions
Drawn B
Date
Dr'n ;; - Gk'd M.4-
Job No.
—
Book ::1,C5 Page 7
LiiCAL MiCRIPTION
L
PARCEL "A"
E �(;�� 110.0 That pert of Lots 5 and 5. Block 1, ,unnar J
C Second Rcnrrangn -ment Rolling Green lying
_ East 11o.0 feet of Lots S and 6 as :,eapure!
IF, r;n,l iltn Nor
N PP.RGEL_ � rinr;l,:s to t:hr• E:Int line of Lnt
PAR C E L_ A extensions.
fj 1 9 PAitCEL
feet of Lots 5 and
f
T..e. Ea -,t 110.0 _ 51 =�
Johnson
' J Second R ^arrecce-e:t Ro'_: a r ^�
i •-,lazuredat richt angle to t.`.e .East 1tr
\_SP F:�+rees and its Northerly ext ^nsie::s.
.' ZO
L
r N
9-i 10
n•9'a548� 1JOF�7H
`3 12 .o0 74.13 —
202.13 e•�b'r.�
("1 AiI. I T LANE .
Y
J
9 -3 -75 Planning Commission Minutes
LD -75 -9 Volney T. DeRemer. Lots 5 and 6, Gunnar Johnson's Second
Rearrangement of Rolling Green. 5808 Mait Lane.
Mr. Luce explained the proposed lot divisions would
reorient lots 5 and 6 to face in a north /south direction; the
lots presently face in an east /west direction and a house has been
constructed on lot 6. He recommended the divisions be approved,
as no additional buildable lots would be created and the request
meets all of the subdivision regulations.
After brief discussion, Mr. G. Johnson moved the requested
lot divisions be approved as recommended. Mr. C. Johnson seconded
the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried.
t
A*
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
l
association of
,metro olitan
n hidpalitiee
300 hanover bldg. 480 cedar street
st. paut. mmnesota 55101 (612) 222 -2861
August 8, 1975
qH
President
Elliott Petrovich TO: Member Officials FROM: Clyde Allen, Jr.
Anoka President
Vice President
Clyde Allen On July 31, 1975, the Board of Directors of the Association—resolved t�
Bloomington
create and /or reactivate several functional issu study committees.,--From
Jack Bailey these committees will come forth recommendat ions hat wl cad_ to the
Minnetonka formation of the Association's legislative program for the i977 Legisla-
tive Session. In addition to the longer range activities for 1977, some
Steve Bernard
White Bear Lake of these committees will also deal with some immediate issues and concerns
that will be addressed in the 1976 Legislature or in the near future by
Richard Brennan the Metropolitan Council and Agencies.
Roseville
Frank Brixius A description of these committees and their short and long range assign -
Greenwood ments are contained on the attached enclosure. The Board would like to
have a clear indication of all persons who are willing and able to give
Jim Cosby of their time and energy to serve on these committees. Also, the Board
Hastings would welcome your suggestions for additional items to be studied and your
Wayne Courtney thoughts as to priorities of the suggested study activities. This is our
Edina opportunity to serve with your neighboring collegues for the betterment of
municipal government. If you are interested, please indicate on the en-
Louis DeMars closed form and return to the Association office by September .1, 1975,
Minneapolis using the self- addressed, stamped envelope that is enclosed.
Frank Fleetham
St. Louis Park In addition to these issue study committees, the Board also voted to estab-
lish a By -Laws Committee for which it would like to have an expression of
Thomas Kelley interested municipal officials.
St. Paul
Duane Miedtke The Board also designated the 10 municipal officials on the Transportation
St. Anthony Advisory Board to be a standing transportation committee to bring forth
recommendations on transportation issues when the need arises.
Bruce Nawrocki
Columbia Heights
Again, please indicate on the enclosed form your willingness to serve and
Josephine Nunn choice of committee(s) and return same by September lst. If you have any
Champlin questions, please contact me or the Executive Director, Vern Peterson, at
the Association office.
Roger Peterson
Cottage Grove
Donald Poss
Brooklyn Center
Lyall Schwarzkop(
Minneapolis
John Christensen
St. Paul
Executive Director
Vern Peterson
Sincerely,
&5�& 42441,1
Clyde Allen, Jr.
CA:sb
Enclosures
P.S. This letter is being sent to Mayors, Councilmembers and Managers/
Administrators /Clerks. If there are other city officials who you
would like to see serve, please submit their names also.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES
COMMITTEE SURVEY
Please indicate which of the following committees.you would be
• interested in serving on by placing a checkmark (✓) in the ap-
propriate space. If several committees are designated, please
prioritize your choices by indicating 1st, 2nd., 3rd, etc. in the
column marked "Priority ".
YES NO PRIORITY
METROPOLITAN.AGENCIES COMMITTEE
GOVERNMENT SERVICES COMMITTEE
MUNICIPAL REVENUES COMMITTEE
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL COMMITTEE
BY -LAWS COMMITTEE
COMMENTS:
SIGNED:.
PREFERRED MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY OF:
BUS. PHONE:
HDME PHONE:
+'r
t -,
M�
;8 ;_ _September, 1975
Mr. Thomas T. Feeney, Area Director
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBA14 'bE1XRLO11MENT
Minneapolis -St. Paul Area Office
1821 University Avenue
St. Paul, Minnesota 55104
4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET - EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
927-8861
_Dear Mr. Feeney:
SUBJECT: Request for Secretary's Urgent Needs Fund
In 11966, this municipality annexed the Village of Morningside, -which had incorpo-
rated in 1922, and was practically .fully developed with a population just under
2,000 at the time of annexation. ':The area is almost entirely single- family
homes, with no industrial tax'ba`se., "and a Very small =reta l business•section.
The homes are generally smaller and older than those in the rest of Edina, and
the median family income is considerably less than that of Edina.
Data contained in the 1970 Federal Census indicate'the following:
Morningside.Area Edina.
Median Family Income $15,043 $19,494 (Table P -4)
-Age .of Housing
Built 1949 or earlier 476 74% 29-929 '22% (Table H -2)
1939 or earlier 300 1,522
1940 -49 146 1,407
Value of Housing
Median $25,500 $38,100 (Table H -1)
.Age of Residents
Age 60 and over 322 15% 5, 338 12% (Table P -1)
Several pages of data from the 1970 Federal Census are enclosed which shows the
differences. Census Tract 0231 is the same area as the former Village of
Morningside.
During `the past year, residents of the area requested that the City consider the
need to rehabilitate the r&6her1 wide- spread deterioration of curb and gut -ter,
sidewalks, and minimal street !sur'facrng 4n`the thirty -block area. Concurrently,
many complaints were registered concerning inadequate water supply due to low
pressure.
.l
Mr. Thomas T. Feeney, Area Director
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
8 September, 1975
Page 2
The Morningside area has.always.secured its.public water supply from the City
of Minneapolis, buying wholesale. The .rest of .Edina is.served by a separate
system which uses wells, rather than the Mississippi River, as a source.
To determine the cause of the low pressure, the City of Edina retained Banister
Short Elliott Hendrickson & Associates, consulting engineers, of St. Paul,
Minnesota. A report just recently received recommends that the existing Morning -
side area water system be replaced because it is inadequate due to internal
tuberculation and external corrosion. The tuberculation is caused by the chemical
content of the river water. The cost of this work is estimated at $1,339,461, or
$2,054 for each of the 652 properties served. The report also pointed out that
with the exception of a two block area, the system is inadequate to deliver the
required fire flows due to unusually high friction losses in the mains.
When the water mains are replaced, as they must be, the existing street surfacing
will be almost completely destroyed. Many of the existing streets have insuffi-
cient base material and en•`y .a :thin - asphaltic surface. The estimated cost of
rebuilding streets and replacing curb and gutter is slightly over $1,000,000, or
nearly $21.00 per assessable foot.
In order to proceed with the construction necessary and desirable to maintain
the existing housing provided by this area, the Edina City Council will hold a
public hearing, Monday, September 15, 1975, on replacing the water mains,
replacing curb and gutter and street surfacing, constructing new and replacement
sidewalks, installing storm sewer in a portion of the area, and providing new
ornamental street lighting. A copy of the notice of this is enclosed. You will
note.o.nPage 4 that the proposed assessments for a 75 foot lot total $4,686.25.
If paid over a 15 -year period, assuming 7% interest, the first year's payment
would be $748.71, with annual reductions to $509.24 at the seventh year.
It is already apparent that many of the property owners feel very strongly that
they cannot afford this amount. Indeed, the special assessments would be higher
than the annual total property tax in many instances.
The question has been asked by property owners as to whether there is any Federal
grant possibility. We understand that in the Community Development funding,
there is a "Secretary's Urgent Needs-Fund ". We are writing to secure a determi-
nation whether a -p.r•o j -ec;t of the type described above is eligible and when funds
would be ava:i lab l,e .
Although Edina's residents pay into the Federal treasury a very significant amount
of income taxes because of the high median family income, the municipality has
received relatively few, small Federal grants during the past several years. The
Federal Revenue Sharing allocation is only $4.27 per,capita, based on the 1970
Federal Census of 44,046. The 1975 estimate by Metropolitan Council is 49,736.
Because of being under 50,000 population, and not having participated in previous
Federal programs, Edina was not eligible by itself to secure grants under the new
Community Development program. Edina cooperated with Hennepin County's efforts
i
Mr. Thomas T. Feeney, Area Director Page 3
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
8 September, 1975
to secure an Urban County allocation. Edina's share of this is $71,286, which
is being used for housing rehabilitation, improvements to our apartment for the
elderly, and commercial rehabilitation.
The only previous Federal grants to Edina were $50,000 from LEAA in 1968 for a
random patrol computer assignment project, and $76,000 from .HUD in 1971 for
open space acquisition.
Edina has always maintained a very low property tax rate in relation to similar
suburbs in the Twin City Metropolitan Area, while using special assessments of
benefited property as the principal source of .financing improvements. The low
property tax rate is also one of the reasons for Edina's low level of Federal
Revenue Sharing and, more recently, for not.receiving any additional aid from
the State of Minnesota.
Edina, this year:, "contributes" more assessed valuation than any other munici-
pality in the metropolitan area to the State- mandated "fiscal disparities" -
distribution -- $7,542,000. Next year, this will amount to more than $15,000,000.
In view of all of the facts, and particularly because the Morningside area
proposed projects will contribute significantly to conserving some 650 homes as
desirable dwelling units, we urge your immediate attention and a positive reply
as to how Federal funds can be made available, so that the needed work can be
done without the home owners having to assume an unbearable tax burden.
hgd
Enclosures
Very truly y
i
Warren C. Hyd
CITY MANAGER
cSubuiban Tublic Sfealtb ` iulsing (Selvice
IN HENNEPIN COUNTY
West 201
8700 W. 36th Street
St. Louis Park, Minn. 55426 August 18, 1975
Telephone: 933 2445
Mr. Warren C. Hyde, City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minn. 55424
Dear Mr. Hyde:
The following is our report of public health
nursing
services
in
' Edina during June, 1975
Additional copies
are
enclosed for council members.
this
this month this
year
last yr.
month
last year to
date
to date
1st of the month case load
70
114
- --
68
- --
66
admitted to service
32
24
10
12
53
22
closed to service
End of month case load
79
112
- --
- --
Accumulative total case load
- --
- --
131
13"-p
Home nursing visits
62
60
316
368
Health teaching- counseling visits
38
22
189
228
Total home visits
100
82
505
596
Not home -not found
2
---
10
8
Home health aide service hours
27
45-3/4
162 -3/4
227 -3/4
Well Child Clinic attendance
1
6
3
10
Immunizations given
11
24
51
73
School visits
- --
- --
-'-
5
1 -3/4
31
L2 -3/4
Flours in schools
- --
Sincerely, '^
r � %
(MISS) HILDA W. BOYLE R. N.
HWB:fm DIRECTOR
cc: Curtiss V. Rockwell, M.D., Health Officer
Kenneth Esse, Sanitarian
SUPPORTED BY TAX FUNDS FROM MUNICIPALITIES OF
4
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE UNITED FUND
Ills 1
IIIIJJ
league of minnesota. municipalities
August 11, 1975
L E A G U E R E G I O N A L M E E T N G S
Sepember 15 through October .9
TO: All Officials of Member Municipalities
This letter is to alert you to the 1975 series of regional meetings sponsored
by the League, so that you will be able to make arrangements to attend..
You may recall that in even - numbered years, we focus on legislative issues and
invite candidates for the legislature to address the regional meetings. However,
this year we will return to the traditional question and answer format and have
invited a number of state agencies to be represented. We hope that this every
other year schedule will continue to provide an opportunity for municipal officials
to exchange information while making more efficient use of the time of everyone
concerned. The regional meeting will be preceded by a "dutch treat" dinner at
6:30 p.m. and in some instances,.by an informal social hour.
A special feature of the regional meeting this year will be a Roundtable Dis-
cussion for Clerks from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m, The program for this workshop -style
session will be as follows:
1. Discussion with county auditors ;,, typical problems in filing
the annual levy ... ways to improve reporting from counties back
to cities on settlement sheets question and answer session
including election laws ... new property tax statement forms.
2. Techniques of budgeting for cities, including making property
tax levies, setting up accounts, estimating revenues and ex-
penditures.
There is no charge for this meeting and any city or county official is welcome.
You may be interested to know that we are also inviting legislators and county
officials to the meetings, as we have in past years. However, there is no
doubt that a personal invitation from you to attend a specific meeting would
be more effective. Discussions with legislators during these informal dinners;;
can begin to develop personal contacts to support our lobbying effort.
Nearer the date of your regional meeting, you will receive your official in-
vitation and dinner reservation card from the host mayor in your area. If
another regional meeting site or date is more convenient, you may choose to
( OVER )
300 hanover building, 460 cedar street, saint paul, minnesota 55101 CIS 121 222 -2661
2 .
attend an alternative meeting. In any event; it is important that you make
a reservation with the host mayor or clerk.
A large representation from your city will assure a lively and profitable dis-
cussion. I will look forward to seeing you there.
Sincerely yours,
Dean A. Lund .
Executive Director
DAL:ck
enc.: 1975 Regional Meeting List
1975 REGIONAL MEETINGS
Date
City
Site
Monday, September 15, 1975
Red Lake Falls, MN
Sullivan's
Tuesday, September 16, 1975
Cass Lake, MN
American Legion Armory
Wednesday, September 17, 1975
Virginia, MN
Miners Memorial Building
Thursday, September 18, 1975
Moose Lake, MN
Moose Lodge
Monday, September 22, 1975
Little Falls, MN
Falls Ballroom
Tuesday, September 23, 1975
Fergus Falls, MN
Holiday Inn
Wednesday, September 24, 1975
Morris, MN
Sunwood Inn
Thursday, September 25, 1975
Litchfield, MN
Litchfield Golf Club
Monday, September 29, 1975
Montevideo, MN
Hotel Hunt
Tuesday, September 30, 1975
Slayton, MN
Royal Supper Club
Wednesday, October 1, 1975
Sherburne, MN
Etter's Fine Dining
Thursday, October 2, 1975
Sleepy Eye, MN
Orchid Inn
Monday, October 6, 1975
Chatfield, MN
Municipal Building
Tuesday, October 7, 1975
Owatonna, MN
Scotch Hearth
Wednesday, October 8, 1975
New Prague, MN
New Prague Country Club
Thursday, October 9, 1975
Chisago City, MN
Chisago Lakes Golf Club
S'
29 August, 1975
The Honorable Wendell R. Anderson
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
130 State Capitol
St. Paul, MN 55101
Dear Governor Anderson,
3'
4801 WEST FIFTIETH -STREET • EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424
927 -8861
Your letter of August 11 to Mrs. Florence Hallberg, City Clerk, thanking the
City of Edina for supporting your proposal to return gross earning revenue to
local governments, was received very well at the City Council meeting, August 18.
Mayor James Van Valkenburg and the Council noted with interest and expectation
your statement that, "we were able to include in the final tax package a very
large increase in Local Government Aid ".
At the same meeting, the Mayor and Council were advised of a letter of July 14
from Commissioner of Revenue Roemer to the City Clerk which stated that Edina's.
1976 Local Government Aid will be $843,137.47. Having anticipated additional
funds on the basis of your letter, the Mayor and Council were aghast when I
advised them that Edina, along with most of the other municipalities in Hennepin
and Ramsey Counties, will receive absolutely no increase over the 1975 payments.
Of the 45 cities in Hennepin County, only 22 will receive more in 1976, and 5
of those* receive less than $5,000 additional. While the Hennepin County total
is about $12.5 million more, one city, not surprisingly in view of its political
profile, gets over $10 million additional next year. Need I name the city?
Minneapolisl I was directed by the Mayor and Council to call this anomaly to
your personal attention.
The Ramsey County figures on 1976 Local Government Aid reveal a generally similar
situation as that in Hennepin County, namely, the central city, St. Paul, receiv-
ing $4,745,000 of the $4,850,000 additional. Only 3 of the.17 suburbs are granted
more in 1976.
It is significant to note, I believe, that the other "winners" in.the legislative
take and put game, like Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, Minnetonka.,
and Robbinsdale, all have much higher three -year average mill rates
and lower 1974 sales ratios than Edina.
Apparently, the formula works to the advantage of the municipalities which have
not made as great an effort as Edina has to comply with State and County guide-
lines on property value assessment practices, and to those who have kept their
tax rates as high as possible.
Also related,to the whole problem is a statement in the MINNEAPOLIS TRIBUNE of
August 18, 1975. This is contained in the second of three articles on teachers'
a
The Honorable Wendell R. Anderson
Page Two
29 August, 1975
salaries and publi.c employee pensions in Minnesota by Bernie Shellum and Steve
Dornfeld. The statement is "Last year, a single telephone call from the office
of Minneapolis Mayor Albert Hofstede was sufficient to exclude the city from a
bill designed to phase out local (pension) funds ". In other words, Minneapolis .
is not willing to face the political problems of refinancing its very expensive,
fiscally unsound police, fire and general employee pension funds. You are aware,
I am certain, of the legislative efforts made over many years by cities of the
second and third class to freeze or phase out similar funds. Minneapolis pension
costs are exorbitant. One of the reasons I resisted any move toward a city
charter for Edina was because charter adoption, until a few years ago, brought
with it automatic inheritance of the special pension fund legislation.
In negotiating with labor unions on salaries and particularly fringe benefits
for police, fire fighters, and public works personnel, we of the suburbs are
constantly faced with the much higher figures granted by Minneapolis, St. Paul,
and the two major counties. Our employees are paid reasonably well on an
absolute basis, but not in comparison to those of our big brothers.
A comparison of the municipalities which are not receiving any additional State -
Aid next year with the 24 cities which were the losers in the so- called "Fiscal
Disparities" finagling indicates that only seven of them get some relief. Two
of the seven, Mendota Heights and Woodbury, are in the plus column by very small
amounts. (See list attached). Minneapolis and St. Paul were, again, the big
winners.
A review of Federal Revenue Sharing would, I believe, show that the cities which
lost in "Fiscal Disparities" and receive no additional State -Aid in 1976 are also
the cities receiving the lowest per capita grants.
In conclusion, the 1975 legislative formula continues to penalize economical,
efficient local government and rewards cities with high tax rates and low sales .
ratios. It completely overlooks the source of state income tax paid by residents.
Very truly
ar /l /l
re n C.
CITY MANAG
hgd
Attachment
Copies: Mayor /Council
Edina Sun
Minneapolis Star /Tribune
Legislators
Suburban City Managers.
League of Municipalities
St. Paul Dispatch
. i
FISCAL DISPARITIES
Amount of Total
Losers
Gain 74 over 71
Contribution
Edina'
23,130,160
9252,067
Bloomington._
2%.707.630
11,883,;015
Inver Grove is-. i� 13, 641,370.
5, 456, 551
Shakopee
11;897,480
4,758,992
Plymouth
11,495,09 0
4, 598, 03 9
Golden Valley
10,943,150
4,377,261
Fridley -� .
13,.137.6.6o
5.,255>066
Maplewood
io, 599 .1870
43 239, 951
Eagan
8, 641, ol0
3, 456, 405 .
Burnsville
8,890,350
3, 556,143
Eden Prairie '�
5, 892, 860
2,357,i45
Minnetonka ' -K
9,174, 820
, 669, 931 .
3,669,931'
Little Canada
3,128,130
1,251,255
Chaska V
3,4675372
1,386,949
Hopkins
4, 421, 580
1, 768, 632
Savage V
. g
2,327, 950
931,181
Blaine �"
8,627,730
3,450,921
-o,
Lakeville
3;602,220
1,44 891
New. Hope
4,44, 542
Aroe,n hills
1,033,550
773, lip 1
.,:_ndota Hts. 1,820,830
728,335
Troodbary
1,°0.x,230
797295
„4st St. rzul {-
3,8'3,3 ?0
1,537;;28
.Moseville V'
8,232,710
3,293,083
2
Distributio
1,709843
4.,4 51,.115
1,13 9 832
616, 488
i, 236, 424
1,099132.
2,114,313
1, 433, 408
749 790
1, 449, 816
260,890
2,280,270
384., 328
52 5, 131
968., 672 .
172,245
2,748,358
828, OJ2
:L,865.,809
255; 92
346, 214
445, 016
1339;:44
2, 001, 536
n Net Chanfe
-7.,542,224
-7431.,900,
-4.,3i6,719
- 4,142, X04
3,3.61,615
- 3,278,129
-3,14o,7 53
- 2,806,543
- 2,706,615
- 2,106,327
- 2,096,255
- 1,389,661
-866,927
-861,818
-799>960 0
-758,936.-
-7 C2 o 563
- 612,799
- 578,733
517 , X17 9
- 382,121
- 351679
197,384
-1, 291, 547
GENE SYLVESTRE ASSOCIATES,
12006 Briar Lane, Minnetonka, Mn. 55343 545 -8163
August 22, 1975
Mr. Warren Hyde
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
• Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Warren,
Following is a summary of our consultative activities for the period between
July 28 and August 22, 1975.
TYPE OF HOURS
CONSULTING WHAT WAS DONE SPENT DATES
GENERAL Held series of discussions and attended meetings 5.5 7/28 -29
of steering committee planning Nov. Family Life 8/12 -19
Workshop. Continued to arrange for keynote and
resource speakers.
Discussed current and contemplated HRC. programs and 3.5 7/28 -29 -31
activities with HRC chairmn and vice- chaixy=. 8/ 5 -12
Prepared discussion materials for monthly HRC meet- 6.5 7/30 -31
ing in August. Prepared and distributed minutes of 8/18 -19
July monthly meeting. Arranged for resource speak
er for September HRC meeting. Attended August .month
-
ly meeting.
Discussed with Community Education Committee chair- 3.5 7/31
woman plans for community "forums" for Fall- Winter. 8/11- 12 -15 -19
Supplied information to other communities on'HRC '1.0 8/12
Award recieved from League of Human Rights Commisj_
Sims.
Held discussions about Vietnamese refugees living 2.0 8/12 -18
in City with representatives from School District
and City congregations.
Began assisting in preparation of Fall - Winter issue 3.5 8/5 -19
of HRC Newsletter.
Prepared monthly.status report on consultative act= ,,,,1.0 8/22
ivities for City Manager and HRC chairman.
1
page 2 - Consultative activities (con't)
EDUCATION Discussed with HRC chairman and representatives 5.0 8/11- 12- 13 -14 -15
from State Department of Human Rights complaint
from teacher about alledged sexist discrim;na-
tion in School District.
Began preparation of data on Affirmative Action 2.5. 8/14 -19
Plans, including "model" grievance and complaint
procedures, that could be used by School District
in implementing its AAP.
-IIMPLOYMENT- Discussed with members of City Chamber of Conmerce 5.0 7/30, 8/13 -19 -22
development,of plans for conductigg AAP Recruit-
ment Workshop. Met with HRC chairman and Chamber
board to discuss. Prepared outline of Workshop
for discussion,
YOUTH Continued discussions with board members of Youth 0.5 8/19
- Action, Inc. on proposal for partial funding being
prepared for City Council.
TOTAL HOURS 39.5
P
c.c. Joel Jennings
fav&vd - 4w4 e4aodem 4 emunew
Executive Secretary — Telephone 612 - 237 -2508
Gaylord, Minnesota — 55334
AuguLst 280 1975
The First Jobs Philip Sousa XmorUa Bud
Attention: Ralph Cagpbon III
441 Best '.iM Street
EdInas WmassotE► 5544
Door I2r. CaWbell t
On bebalf of the Gaylord Chamber of Comorae I would like to tbank
you and your bond for your recast concert in G®ylord* tie were
bonored you included us'in yamr tour of southvestern Himesote.
We 'injoyed your am 10 and want to aosaaa and your band and the City
of mm for the work you are doing with the anja►l.
Sincerely yours,
Douglas H. 1406vig
DM/bh
acs City Council
City of Bdim
Bdi o Himmagots 55424
EHLERS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS
FIRST NATIONAL-SOO LINE CONCOURSE 507 MARQUETTE AVE. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 339 -8291 (AREA CODE 612)
September 1, 1975
File: Financial-Consultants: Ehlers and Associates
Please distribute to governing body members
Scratch another summer! We used to think of it as a kind of "ho hum" time. The ranks of governing bodies, their
staffs, bond underwriters and sales crews and their retail buyers are supposed to be decimated by vacations, farm
work, etc. But we aren't finding these suppositions true. It's remarkable how busy we've been.
* * * * ** DOW JONES INDEX 7.16%
The tax exempt bond market continues its rather depressed state
(high interest rates) as reflected by the indices of yields.
However, the upper midwest bond market has outperformed the
national market with significantly lower rates. Part of the prob-
lem is that the indices are mostly made up of larger city bonds- -
and many large cities' financial conditions have deteriorated.
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* * * * * * Monday, August 18, 1975
Levy limits can cost the taxpayers. Many states, including Minnesota and Wisconsin, have adopted property tax
levy limits, but Wisconsin took a further step of applying its levy limits to debt service as well as operating ex-
penses (for some municipalities and school districts). This has the effect of making municipal bonds limited
obligations which, if they are salable at all, will cost at least 1% higher interest rates - -about $120,000 more for
each $1 million, 20 year issue.
* * * * **
Following a May visit by Sandra Reiners (Moody's Investors Service), she and her associate Fran Griffith visited
Minnesota again August 14. A seminar sponsored by the Minnesota Chapter of the MFOA and City Managers was
most informative. Sandy and Fran then took the opportunity to spend a couple of days inspecting the area on the
ground and from the air in Two Mike Tango. Couple of sharp analysts, we'd say.
* * * * **
In August, we wrapped up a novel hospital financing. Isonti County, Minnesota, and the Memorial Hospital Asso-
ciation of Cambridge (Wayne Allemang, administrator) undertook a $6 million expansion project involving a
$3,690,000 G.O. revenue bond issue, a $1,475,000 direct loan by HEW, and a $638,000 grant. The combined
G.O./HEW revenue bond financing involving the County, a private non - profit corporation and HEW, presented some
unusual complexities, but with the understanding and help of the County Board, HEW officials, the Association
Board, all difficulties were resolved with a minimum of delay. The project broke new trails in hospital financing.
* * * * **
If we can help your community in any financing area, feel free to call collect.
Very truly yours,
Tstenr
b Average of
20-Year Bands
.a0
6
L
Al
.00
1974
1975
S
OCT I OV
DEC
JAN
PEB
APR
rAr
lDN
M
AW
f
M
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
* * * * * * Monday, August 18, 1975
Levy limits can cost the taxpayers. Many states, including Minnesota and Wisconsin, have adopted property tax
levy limits, but Wisconsin took a further step of applying its levy limits to debt service as well as operating ex-
penses (for some municipalities and school districts). This has the effect of making municipal bonds limited
obligations which, if they are salable at all, will cost at least 1% higher interest rates - -about $120,000 more for
each $1 million, 20 year issue.
* * * * **
Following a May visit by Sandra Reiners (Moody's Investors Service), she and her associate Fran Griffith visited
Minnesota again August 14. A seminar sponsored by the Minnesota Chapter of the MFOA and City Managers was
most informative. Sandy and Fran then took the opportunity to spend a couple of days inspecting the area on the
ground and from the air in Two Mike Tango. Couple of sharp analysts, we'd say.
* * * * **
In August, we wrapped up a novel hospital financing. Isonti County, Minnesota, and the Memorial Hospital Asso-
ciation of Cambridge (Wayne Allemang, administrator) undertook a $6 million expansion project involving a
$3,690,000 G.O. revenue bond issue, a $1,475,000 direct loan by HEW, and a $638,000 grant. The combined
G.O./HEW revenue bond financing involving the County, a private non - profit corporation and HEW, presented some
unusual complexities, but with the understanding and help of the County Board, HEW officials, the Association
Board, all difficulties were resolved with a minimum of delay. The project broke new trails in hospital financing.
* * * * **
If we can help your community in any financing area, feel free to call collect.
Very truly yours,
SUMMARY OF AREA BOND SALES
MINNESOTA
4/15/75
Promissory Notes
3,000M
Dow -Jones
4.454%
6.92%
A -1
Years of
Net
20 Year
Bond
Sale Date
Dow
-Jones
Maturity
Rate
Index
Rating
Years of
Net
20 Year
Bond
Municipality Sale Date
Type of Bonds
Amount
Maturitv
Rate
Index
Rating
Coon Rapids, MN
4 /1/75
G.O. Capital
$ 130M
77/80
5.600%
6.72%
Bawl
7.01%
A
Improvement
G.O. Improvement
1,080M
76/87
5.782%
7.01%
Coon Rapids, MN
4/1/75
G.O. Revenue
770M
76/94
6.590%
6.72%
Boa -1
7114175
G.O. Improvement
Recreation
76/85
5.530%
7.01%
A
7/14/75
Coon Rapids, MN
4/1/75
G.O. Park
91 OM
77/90
6.388%
6.72%
Boa -1
Clearwater County, MN
4 /1/75
G.O. State -Aid
990M
76/85
5.845%
6.72%
A
Waterville,
A -1
Amery, JSD 015, WI
6/17/75
School Building
3,400M
78/94
6.950%
ISD #395, MN
4/1/75
G.O. Refunding
1,730M
76/88
6.120%
6.72%
A
Moorhead, MN
417175
G.O. Tax Increment
1,035M
78/84
5.950%
6.82%
A
Isonti County, MN
4/7/75
G.O. Hospital
3,690M
78/96
7.130%
6.82%
A
Coss County, MN
4/8/75
G.O. State Aid Road
700M
76/80
5.390%
6.82%
A
Minnesota Higher Ed.
JSD 03, WI
6/24/75
Promissory Notes
560M
77/95
6.610%
Facilities Authority
4/8/75
College Revenue
690M
76/96
7.990%
6.82%
A
Minnesota Higher Ed.
A
Revenue
Facilities Authority
4/8/75
College Revenue
1,450M
76/94
8.320%
6.82%
Boa
Morris, MN
4/8/75
G.O. Water Revenue
625M
78/96
6.940%
6.82%
A
Eden Prairie, MN
4/9/75
G.O. Water & Sewer
3,000M
76/94
6.908%
6.82%
Boa
Spring Volley, MN
4/9/75
G.O. Nursing Home
1,045M
78/88
6.770%
6.82%
Be.
7.01%
A
Revenue
7/21/75
Corporate Purpose
1,130M
77/91
6.470%
Maple Grove, MN
4/14/75
G.O. Improvement
745M
77/86
6.442%
6.82%
Bee-1
St. Paul, ISD #625, MN
4/15/75
General Obligation
1,310M
77/86
5.519%
6.82%
Aa
Sho,eview, MN
4/21/75
G.O. Refunding
795M
75/89
6.451%
6.82%
Bao -1
Stewartville, MN
4/22/75
G.O. Short Term Revenue
600M
77
5.294%
6.82%
N/R
Polk County, MN
4/23/75
State -Aid Road
1,000M
76/83
5.262%
6.82%
A
Shakopee, ISD #720, MN
4/24/75
G.O. School Building
2,625M
78/98
6.912%
6.82%
A
Rosemount, MN
4/28/75
G.O. Fire Hall
275M
76/86
6.044%
6.93%
A
Rosemount, MN
4/28/75
G.O. Improvement
380M
77/89
6.159%
6.93%
A
Crosby - Ironton,
A -1
Minot, N.D.
5/19/75
Airport
400M
76/85
5.640%
ISD #182, MN
4/29/75
G.O. School Building
3,500M
77/96
6.980%
6.93%
A
Camden, MN
5/1/75
General Obligation
40M
76/81
5.750%
6.93%
N/R
Fergus Falls, MN
5/5/75
General Obligation
1,510M
78/91
6.139%
6.88%
A
Jordan, MN
5/5/75
G.O. Improvement
715M
78/95
6.646%
6.88%
B.a -1
Bemidji, MN
5/5/75
Improvement
1,375M
77/96
6.480%
6.88%
A
Lamberton, MN
5/5/75
Various Purpose
610M
77/96
6.692%
6.88%
Boa -I
Willmar, ISD #347, MN
5/5/75
School Building
560M
77/85
5.570%
6.88%
A
Wayzata, MN
5/6/75
General Obligation
331M
76/86
5.687%
6.88%
A -1
St. Cloud, MN
5/6/75
G.O. Refunding
4,650M
76/87
5.875%
6.88%
A -1
Minneapolis, MN
5/6/75
River Terminal
1,265M
76/95
6.200%
6.88%
Aaa
Minneapo Lls, MN
5/6/75
Various Purpose
14,000M
76/83
5.250%
6.88%
Aaa
Stillwater, MN
5/6/75
Improvement
560M
77/86
5.662%
6.88%
A
Koachiching County, MN
5/6/75
State -Aid Highway
800M
76/80
5.385%
6.88%
A
Lyle, ISD #497, MN
5/8/75
General Obligation
60M
76/91
6.744%
6.88%
N/R
Claremont, ISD #201, MN
5/12/75
General Obligation
685M
78/90
6.279%
6.78%
A
Wrensholl, ISD 0100, MN
5/12/75
G.O. School Building
1,020M
78/93
6.886%
6.78%
8aa-1
Browery I I le,
ISD #787, MN
5/13/75
School Building
1,695M
78/92
6.801%
6.78%
Boa
Pennington County, MN
5/13/75
General Obligation
1,690M
78/95
6.690%
6.78%
Boo-I
Minnetonka, MN
5/13/75
Gross Revenue Arena
270M
78/90
7.000%
6.78%
N/R
Richfield, MN
5/14/75
G.O. Improvement
4,600M
78/97
6.588%
6.78%
A -1
Stevens County, MN
5/19/75
G.O. Hospital
2,430M
78/96
6.694%
6.83%
A
Montevideo, MN
5/19/75
G.O. Hospital Revenue
865M
78/87
6.208%
6.83%
A
North Mankato, MN
5/19/75
G.O. Water Revenue
1,000M
78/95
6.689%
6.83%
A
Chippewa County, MN
5/20/75
G.O. Hospital Revenue
865M
78/87
6.169%
6.83%
A
Farmington, MN
5/21/75
G.O. Ice Arena
680M
78/86
6.367%
6.83%
Boa
Anoka /Hennepin,
ISD #11, MN
5/27/75
Refunding School Bonds
4,500M
76/90
6.230%
7.07%
A
Anoka/Hennepin,
ISD #11, MN
5/27/75
Refunding School Bands
8,150M
76/89
6.540%
7.07%
A
Inver Grove, MN
5/27/75
Temporary Improvement
605M
78
5.163%
7.07%
A
Melrose, MN
5/27/75
G.O. Improvement
365M
77/91
6.471%
7.07%
Boo-1
Rochester, ISD #535, MN
5/28/75
G.O. Refunding
2,010M
76/82
5.914%
7.07%
A
Grand Rapid., MN
5/28/75
G.O. Bridge
357M
78/95
6.685%
7.07%
A
Minnetrlsta, MN
6/2/75
G.O. Improvement
3,985M
77/94
6.988%
7.07%
Boa-1
Marshall, MN
6/2/75
G.O. Improvement
140M
77/86
5.801%
7.07%
Boo -1
Marshall, MN
6/2/75
G.O. Sewer Treatment
1,250M
78
5.344%
7.07%
Boa -I
Plant
Marshall, MN
6/2/75
Tax Increment
100M
78/82
5.531%
7.07%
Baa -1
Detroit Lakes, MN
6/3/75
Municipal Building
300M
76/85
6.973%
7.07%
Baa -1
Revenue
Little Falls, MN
6/9/75
Improvement
450M
77/96
6.680%
7.01%
Boa
Red Wing, MN
6/9/75
Storm Sewer
1,525M
77/86
5.510%
7.01%
Aa
Forest Lake,
ISD #831, MN
6/9/75
Refunding
5,670M
76/88
6.596%
7.01%
Bao -1
St. Peter, ISD #508, MN
6110175
School Refunding
1,550M
76/88
6.160%
7.01%
A
S. Washington County,
ISD #833, MN
6/16/75
School Acquisition &
840M
77/86
5.916%
6.82%
Baa -1
Betterment
Maple Grove, MN
6/16/75
Temporary Improvements
1,110M
78
5.116%
6.82%
Boa-1
Loketown, MN
6/16/75
Temporary Improvements
735M
78
5.496%
6.82%
N/R
Edina, MN
6/16/75
Temporary Improvements
1,000M
75
3.649%
6.82%
Aa
Mpls. /St. Paul Airports
Commission, MN
6/16/75
G.O. Revenue
10,000M
78/05
6.316%
6.82%
Aa
Spring Valley, MN
6/17/75
G.O. Improvement
420M
78/91
6.600%
6.82%
Boa
Medina, MN
6/17/75
G.O. Improvement
855M
77/96
6.764%
6.82%
Boo
Sauk Centre, MN
6/18/75
Sewer & Water
250M
78/87
6.098%
6.82%
Bawl
Improvements
Apple Valley, MN
6/18/75
Various Purpose
1,732M
77/95
6.613%
6.82%
Boa
Roseville, MN
6/23/75
G.O. Improvement
1, 130M
77/95
6.500%
6.92%
A -1
Roseville, MN
6/23/75
G.O. City Hall
850M
77/95
6.538%
6.92%
A -1
St, Cloud, MN
6/23/75
Unlimited Tax
1,700M
78/97
6.585%
6.92%
A.1
Wyoming, MN
6/23/75
Temporary Improvements
1, 100M
77
4.886%
6.92%
N/R
Lakeville, MN
6/23/75
Temporary Improvements
945M
77/78
5.190%
6.92%
Boo-1
Lakeville, MN
6/23/75
Improvements
805M
77/96
6.909%
6.92%
Boo-1
Plymouth, MN
6/23/75
G.O. Improvement
6,050M
77/90
6.240%
6.92%
A
St. Michael, MN
6/24/75
G.O. Improvement
140M
77/86
6.317%
6.92%
N/R
Oakdale, MN
6/25/75
G.O. Improvement
590M
77/91
6.445%
6.92%
Baa -1
MINNESOTA (Continued)
Municipality
Eagan, MN
Minnetonka, MN
Grand Rapids, MN
W. St. Paul, MN
Ramsey County, MN
Northfield, MN
Duluth, MN
Duluth, MN
Mountain Lake,
ISD #173, MN
Pipestone County, MN
S. St. Paul, MN
Ada, M\
Grove City, MN
Burnsville, MN
Thief River Falls, MN
Thief River Falls, MN
Monticello, MN
Monticello, MN
Sertell, MN
Albert Lea, MN
Waconia, MN
Shakopee, MN
Shakopee, MN
Hutchinson,
ISD #423, MN
Burnsville, MN
East Grand Forks, MN
Renville, MN
Staples, ISD #793, MN
WISCONSIN
7/14/75 School Building
7/14/75 G.O. State Aid Highway
7/15/75 G.O. Improvement
7/16/75 G.O. Improvement
7/17/75 G.O. Improvement
7/21/75 Temporary Improvement
7/22/75 G.O. Sewer & Water
7/22/75 Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Municipal Building
7/28/75 G.O. Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Hospital Revenue
7/29/75 G.O. Improvement
7/29/75 G.O. Public Service Bldg.
7/29/75 G.O. Improvement
7/29/75 School Building
8/4/75 G.O. Refunding
8/5/75 Temporary Improvement
8/11/75 G.O. Improvement
8/12/75 G.O. State Aid
60M 77/88 6.164% 7.01% N/R
940M 78/88 5.893% 7.01% A
1,280M 78/87 5.813% 7.01% A
490M 77/90 6.280% 7.01% Bee-1
240M 77/91 6.985% 7.01% N/R
3,030M 78 5.016% 7.17% A
1,250M 76/95 6.887% 7.17% Boo -1
245M 76/95 6.887% 7.17% Bao -1
130M 77/85 6.004% 7.28% A
775M 78/92 6.465% 7.28% A
565M 77/86 6.102% 7.28% Boa
385M 78/89 6.107% 7.28% A -1
675M 77/91 6.300% 7.28% Boa -1
850M 77/89 6.153% 7.28% A
175M 78/87 5.886% 7.28% A
710M 77/86 5.755% 7.28% A
2,015M 76/89 6.135% 7.18% A
1,330M 78 5.189% 7.18% Be.
225M 77/91 6.333% 7.18% A
1,315M 76 5.1707 7.18% N/R
De Pere, WI
4/15/75
Promissory Notes
3,000M
Dow -Jones
4.454%
6.92%
A -1
Years of
Net
20 Year
Bond
Sale Date
Type of Bonds
Amount
Maturity
Rate
Index
Rating
7/1/75
G. O. Improvement
$1,035M
77/90
6.191%
7.01%
Bao -1
7/9/75
G. O. Improvement
6,325M
77/91
6.221%
7.01%
A
7/9/75
G. O. Improvement
435M
77/86
5.810%
7.01%
A
7/10/75
G.O. Improvement
1,080M
76/87
5.782%
7.01%
A -1
7/14/75
G.O. Open 5pace
3,030M
77/90
5.882%
7.01%
An
7114175
G.O. Improvement
465M
76/85
5.530%
7.01%
A
7/14/75
G.O. Cart. of Indebtedness 180M
77/80
6.030%
7.01%
A -1
7/14/75
G.O. Improvement
1,000M
77/91
6.030%
7.01%
A -1
7/14/75 School Building
7/14/75 G.O. State Aid Highway
7/15/75 G.O. Improvement
7/16/75 G.O. Improvement
7/17/75 G.O. Improvement
7/21/75 Temporary Improvement
7/22/75 G.O. Sewer & Water
7/22/75 Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Municipal Building
7/28/75 G.O. Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Improvement
7/28/75 G.O. Hospital Revenue
7/29/75 G.O. Improvement
7/29/75 G.O. Public Service Bldg.
7/29/75 G.O. Improvement
7/29/75 School Building
8/4/75 G.O. Refunding
8/5/75 Temporary Improvement
8/11/75 G.O. Improvement
8/12/75 G.O. State Aid
60M 77/88 6.164% 7.01% N/R
940M 78/88 5.893% 7.01% A
1,280M 78/87 5.813% 7.01% A
490M 77/90 6.280% 7.01% Bee-1
240M 77/91 6.985% 7.01% N/R
3,030M 78 5.016% 7.17% A
1,250M 76/95 6.887% 7.17% Boo -1
245M 76/95 6.887% 7.17% Bao -1
130M 77/85 6.004% 7.28% A
775M 78/92 6.465% 7.28% A
565M 77/86 6.102% 7.28% Boa
385M 78/89 6.107% 7.28% A -1
675M 77/91 6.300% 7.28% Boa -1
850M 77/89 6.153% 7.28% A
175M 78/87 5.886% 7.28% A
710M 77/86 5.755% 7.28% A
2,015M 76/89 6.135% 7.18% A
1,330M 78 5.189% 7.18% Be.
225M 77/91 6.333% 7.18% A
1,315M 76 5.1707 7.18% N/R
De Pere, WI
4/15/75
Promissory Notes
3,000M
80
4.454%
6.92%
A -1
Elk Mound, JSD #2, WI
4/22/75
School Notes
940M
77/85
6.550%
6.82%
Aa -1
Onalaska, WI
4/23/75
School Building
2,169M
77/88
6.442%
6.82%
A
Onalaska, WI
4/23/75
Promissory Notes
225M
77/84
6.094%
6.82%
A
Chippewa Falls, WI
5/6/75
Corporate Purpose
1,600M
76/85
6.027%
6.88%
A -1
Whitehall, WI
5/13/75
Promissory Notes
190M
77/85
6.250%
6.78%
N/R
New Berlin, CSD #14, WI
5/28/75
Promissory Notes
700M
82/83
5.893%
7.07%
A
Lisbon•Pewoukee,
JCSD #2, WI
5/29/75
School Building
325M
78/86
6.369%
7.07%
N/R
Berlin, WI
5/29/75
Corporate Purpose
635M
76/86
5.876%
7.07%
A -1
Amery, JSD 015, WI
6/17/75
School Building
3,400M
78/94
6.950%
6.82%
A
Oconomowoc, WI
6/17/75
Corporate Purpose
1,650M
77/90
6.135%
6.82%
A -1
Milwaukee, WI
6/17/75
G.O. Corporate Purpose
9,050M
76/90
5.495%
6.82%
Aaa
Altoona, WI
6/19/75
Corporate Purpose
530M
76/85
5.873%
6.82%
N/R
Weyerhaeuser,
JSD 03, WI
6/24/75
Promissory Notes
560M
77/95
6.610%
6.92%
N/R
Waupoco, WI
6/24/75
Waterworks System
1,300M
77/95
7.226%
6.92%
A
Revenue
Appleton, WI
7/2/75
Corporate Purpose
2,01 OM
76/89
5.929%
7.01%
A -1
Fond du Lac, WI
7/9/75
Corporate Purpose
6,250M
76/95
5.934%
7.01%
An
Suamico, JSD #1, WI
7/14/75
School Building
2,000M
76/90
6.410%
7.01%
A
Prairie du Chien, WI
7/15/75
Corporate Purpose
750M
77/86
5.769%
7.01%
A
Manomanie, WI
7/21/75
Corporate Purpose
1,130M
77/91
6.470%
7.17%
A
Franklin, WI
7/22/75
Refunding
2,140M
76/95
6.887%
7.17%
Baa -1
Chetek, WI
7/29/75
G.O. Promissory Notes
325M
77/85
6.270%
7.28%
N/R
Chetek, WI
7/29/75
Municipal Nursing
200M
78/95
8.000%
7.28%
N/R
Home Revenue
Chippewa Falls, WI
8/5/75
G.O. School Building
1,400M
77/93
6.724%
7.18%
A -1
NORTH DAKOTA
Oakes, PSD #41, N.D.
4/15/75
School Building
615M
77/90
6.291%
6.92%
A
Minot, N.D.
5/19/75
Refunding Improvement
400M
76/86
5.531%
6.83%
A -1
Minot, N.D.
5/19/75
Airport
400M
76/85
5.640%
6.83%
A -1
Minot, N.D.
5/19/75
G.O. Flood Control
800M
77/85
5.590%
6.83%
AA
Mandan, N.D.
6/24/75
Refunding
625M
77/93
6.190%
6.92%
A
Barnes County, N.D.
6/25/75
G.O. Industrial Develop.
300M
76/83
5.100%
6.92%
A
Wahpetan, N.D.
8/6/75
Refunding
600M
76/95
6.378%
7.18%
A -1
SOUTH DAKOTA
Watertown, ISD #1, S.D.
5/20/75
School Building
1,750M
77/95
6.710%
6.83%
A -1
Rapid City, S.D.
6/2/75
G.O. Waterworks
500M
78/95
6.633%
7.07%
A -1
Howard, ISD #102, S.D.
7/22/75
G.O. School Refunding
780M
76/88
6.085%
7.17%
A
IOWA
Muscatine, IA
6/5/75
G.O. Sewer
1,800M
77/94
6.111%
7.07%
N/R
Cedar Falls, IA
6/12/75
G.O. Airport
3,000M
77/82
4.711%
7.01%
Aaa
Arnaldo Park, CSD, IA
6/18/75
School Building
471M
78/93
5.982%
6.82%
N/R
Waterloo, IA
7/17/75
Street Construction
735M
77/85
5.201%
7.01%
Aa
Waterloo, IA
7/17/75
Sewer Construction
520M
77/85
5.199%
7.01%
Aa
Waterloo, IA
7/17/75
Flood Control
50M
77/79
4.681%
7.01%
Aa
li 9
I
August 19, 1975
Mayor James Van Valkenburg
Council Members
4801 W. 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Sirs;
V _
This letter is in regard to the information and proposal sent 'to you
by the MTU on .April 4.
Your response has been an adamant refusal to consider your rental
housing problems with a view towards setting up a program to resolve
them. Rental housing comprises a substantial percentage of the housing
units in your suburb, and is .likely to comprise an ever greater per-
centage in the future. The tenants in those units are the only persons
capable of enforcing the landlord /tenant legislation which establishes
equitable relationships, and even more importantly, defines responsib-
ility for repairs, maintenance and other items. Housing Is one of the
city's pr.imary..physical resources, and as the cost of new construction
continues to .increase, preserving - the - existing housing stock be,c.omes
incr.easi.ngly .importan.t. Unfortunat,el.y_, the economics of rental housing
operate in a'ma`nner which decreases.re.pair and maintenance efforts in
proportion to the building's age. Thi''s creates the kind of violations
of the housing maintenance code which your Inspections, or Buildings
Department is familiar with.
It is very much in the.interests of your city to ensure that rental
housing is properly maintained and legally operated; for a number of
reasons:
1) rental housing.is one of your.largest businesses and tenants
contribute a s.ubst.an.t,ia1 share o,f your pro:pe,rty ,tax revenues;
2) .the -re 'putati.on .of .y.our housing stock is an important .criteria
in residents .evaluation of the quality of .life in your suburb;
3).in addition to tenants, homeowners whose homes are near the
complexes are concerned about their condition, and
4).b.ui.ldi:ngs which.axe poorly operated have high turnover rates,
and research which has been done links transience with high incidences
of vandalism and other property crimes.
1513 E: FRANKLN M
MPLS., X:55404
877 °.2701 or 871.7485
1 4V
x.
It must be understood that when one talks about rental housing, one is
talking about an economic situation where conflicts of interest are
very clear. Property owners wish a maximum return with a minimum of
capital investment. Tenants wish the maximum services they are paying
for, and a minimum of problems. The interest of owners cannot be held
to be equivalent with the interests of tenants in terms of the city's
responsibilities. The city provides many services for owners during
development and construction, and while the building is operating.
The services the city provides to existing buildings are those utilized
by tenants (streets, sewers,parks,schools,etc) which make it possible
for owners to attract tenants and make money. The interests of tenants
themselves, particularly when in conflict with their landlord's,_(although
not in conflict with the law) have to date been ignored outside the
city of Minneapolis, with the exception of our organization. Owners
have information on their rights and responsibilities available to them
as part of the overhead of their business; tenants have nowhere to turn
when their rights are being trampled, or when they lack information.
To reiterate, our proposal requested funding to continue provi.di,ng the
enumerated services to tenants, or action by the city to set up tenant
assistance services locally. The nature of tenant assistance services
does not allow total voluntary support by tenants, because;) tenants
often don'.t recognize a need for assistance until they have a problem,
and 2) in order to operate efficiently, much of the work must be done
over the phone, and it is impossible to collect fees for a phone service.
At this point our funding is provided by the city of Minneapolis,
and the city has refused to fund services for non -Mpls. residents.
Unless we can develop a more fruitful means of communication with you,
we plan to discontinue serving your residents (except for MTU members)
as of September first, 1975. We have been reluctant to do this considering
the considerable number of calls we receive and the kinds of problems
this step will create for tenants and for your local government, but
we have little choice.
We are hoping that you will respond to these problems before a housing
situation similar to that in Minneapolis, or other suburban communities
around the country, develops further. the Minneapolis metro area is a
good place to live, and we hope that we can work together to ensure
that uality housing continues to be part of what your community has
to of ;er.
Please feel free-to contact us at your eatliest convenience, hopefully
before September 1.
Sincerely,
Lisa Kugler
co- director
CC: City Manager
COMMERCIAL AREA PATROL - INCIDENT STATISTICS
July 1, 1975 - July 31, 1975
C: =`
DATE
TIME
INCIDENT
LOCATION
DISP.
7500 191
7/1/75
0128
Alarm
3555 W. 69th -Polly Berg
OTH
75C,0,t202
7/1/75.
1349
PI Accident
69th and France
OTH
7500' 20`:
7/1/75
1541
Shoplifter
Daytons
CBA
75004205
7/1/75
1715
Exposer
Target Parking
CONT
7>00-206
7/1/75
1726
Shoplifter :
J.C.Penney's
CBA
75006207
7/1/75
1730
Shoplifter
J.C.Penney's
CBA
75o`9913
.7/1/75
2250
Alarm
Wheel Goods
A &A
75C^�21=
7/1/75
2251
Bicycle Theft
Southdale Bowl
CONT
';50:;213
.7/2/75
0134
Alarm
Wheel Goods
A &A
170,06220
7/2/75
0232
Alarm
Polly Berg
A &A
750D6223
7/2/75
1021
Key Locked in Vehicle
Target Parking Lot
A &A
75004231
7/2/75
1059
P.D.Accident
Target
A &A
750Co233
7/2/75
1110
P.D.Accident
6800 France
OTH
750.6237
7/2/75
1500
Resisting Arrest /Shoplifter Target
CBA
750C2?7
7/2/75
2259
Susp.Circumstances
Southdale Ford Lot
A &A
75CO6265
7/3/75
1430
Accident
Fox Lot
A &A
X5006270
7/3%75
1803
Alarm
7200 York- Const.Shack
A &A
/5006273
7/3/75
1830
Bicycle Theft
Target
OTH
7 : 277
7/3/75
2148
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
750tc290
7/4/75
0520
Open Door
Dayton Garden Center
A &A
CCc?93
7/4/75
og16
Alarm
7200 York
INA
7 oc-S' - -o'
��. -.. -.a
7/4/75
1200
r
Shoplifter
Target
,INA
750Dc301
7/4/75
1707
Alarm
County Seat
A &A
7;0'.;6302
7/4/75
1711
Alarm
3517 Hazelton
A &A
75C0S303
7/4/75
1955
Open Door
S'dale Int.Systems
A &A
? c 5�; 9-339
S0
7/5/75
1425
Warrants
67th and York
ROA
i50C3' -'0
7/5/75.
1433
Animal /Public Order
Goose Lot
CBA'
750.6341
7/5/75
1450
P.D.Acc.L
Camel Lot
A &A
750_33
7/5/75
1527
Public Assist
Fox Lot
A &A
75&�6344
7/5/75
1551
Medical
Target
A &A
;503' -3
7/5/75
1806
Shoplifter
Donaldson's
CBA
750.373
7/5/75
1110
Alarm
Midrise Apartments
A &A
7/6/75
1415
DOA
7151`.York,Apt.415
CONT
750,3`30?
7/6/75
1608
Theft from Business
Parker - Hanley
CONT
750utS 3o5
7/6/75
1614
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
500630
7/6/75
1758
Medical
4000 Hazelton
A &A
750u6tG9
7/7/75
0913
Alarm
3500 W. 70th
A &A
75GOc 1%
7/7/75
1004
Medical Emergency
7171 France
A &A
;5C�c413
7/7/75
1430
Bicycle Theft
7200 York
OTH
7/7/75
1831
Bicycle Theft
Southdale
CONT
11L)Uc457
7/8/75
1451
P.D.Accident
Alligator Lot
A &A
750 -_S502
7/9/75
1719
Shoplifter
Donaldson's
CBA
75COc50>
7/9/75
1921
H &R P.D.Accident
Southdale
A &A
750C;'510
7/9/75
2313
Vandalism
Southdale Bowl
A &A
750 5522
7/10/75
0950
H &R Accident
Target Parking Lot
A &A
7/10/75
1005
Shoplifter
114 Southdale Center
CBA
75'j�,,-527
7/10/75
1225
P.D.Accident
Rooster Lot
A &A
7 C6,52S
7/10/75
1234
Dumping off a Trailer
3910 W. 70th St.
A &A
750��5?
7/11/75
0014
H &R P.D.Accident
Hazelton & France
INA
i
Co=ercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
u-'y 1, 1975 -ju1y 31, 1975
C-
DATE
TIME
75006554
7/11/75
0058
75006563
7/11/75
1504
,'5006569
7/11/75
1648
75006577
7/11/75
1831
75-005573
71/11/75.
1933
75006584
7/11/75
2130
75006600
7/12/75
0742
?5006001
7/11/75
0914
75006605
7/12/75
1052
75006013
7/12/75
1427
75000"615
7/12/75
1506
750:;6618
7/12/75
1535
75oo6620
7/12/75
1640
75006524
7/12/75
1815
75006625
7/12/75
1826
75000626
7/12/75
1937
75005634
7/12/75
2338
75006164 7
7/13/75
1708
75005548
7/13/75
1714
75006649
7/13/75
1739
7500-6550
7/13/75
1741
.7U;0665
7/14/75
0956
7 506668
7/i4/75
1309
75000671
7/i4/75
1517
75006675
7/14/75
1949
750 ^6581
7/14/75
2346
750`694
7/15/75
1333
75006703
7/15/75
1916
75606711
7/15/75
2358
75000 715
7/16/75
0236
7500D 5722
7/16/75
1135
7506729
7%16/75
1431
750116730
7/16/75
1450
75006732
7/i6/75
1610
75606733
.7/16/75
1715
75006735
7/16/7.5
1802
75006736
7/16/75
1817
750, 0, 6737
7/16/75
1824
750067;1.
7/17/75
0531
750' -675-
7/17/75
0754
75r°0 :,755
7/17/75
1104
75096756
7/17/75
1108
75006764
7/17/75
1644
750 °06779
7/18/75
0144
75006701
7/18/75
0218
75006782
7/18/75
0253
770o578_,
7/18/75
0311
7500'7''9
7/18/75
1118
7500)679
7/18/75
1352
,.,
t-1 v :
7/18/75
1412
INCIDENT
Customers Disturbing
Theft by Check
Shoplifter
Acct.Closed Checks
Poss.of Marijuana
Shoplifter
Alarm
Firecrackers
P.D.Accident
P.D.Accident
P.D.Accident
Poss. of Marijuana
Welfare Check
Found Property
Assist Store Clerk
DK
Customer Assist
Theft from Auto
Alarm
Exposer
Theft from Business
Alarm
Shoplifter
Shoplifter's
Bicycle Theft
Possible Prowler
Bicycle Theft
Shoplifting
Noise (Kids)
Alarm
Shoplifter.
Threats
Shoplifter
Shoplifter
Forgery
Theft from Auto
Alarm
P.D.Accident
Susp.Circumstances
Alarm
Theft from Auto - Parts
Theft
Shoplifters
Open Door
Open Door
P.D.Accident
Susp.Circumstances
Alarm- Holdup
Bicycle Theft
Theft
Page 2
LOCATION
Southdale Bowl
Music &.Things
Red Owl
3650 Hazelton
3650 Hazelton
Penney's
Liemandt's
Southdale Ford
66th and York
.Kangaroo Lot
S'dale Cinema Lot
Fox Lot
Tiger Lot
Rabbit Lot
Ups and Downs
Southdale Bus Stop
.Southdale Bowl
Duck Lot
3525 Hazelton Road
Super Sams.
Dayton's -Men's
Cedric's
Donaldson's
Dayton's
Southdale Bowl
Happy Chef
Southdale Library
Dayton's
Zapata's
Donaldson's
Wrangler Roost
Donaldson's
Target
. . Penney's
Ups & Downs
Key Cadillac
7200 York- Const.Shack
72nd and France
Const.Area -7240 York
Mr. Cricket
Donaldson's Overflow
S'dale Med.Bldg. #25
Penney's
E.side of Galleria
Key Cadillac
Byerly's
S.side of 66th between
France & Xerxes
1st S'dale Natl.Bank
Dayton's Lane
Garde_? Court
DISP.
A &A
CONT
UNF
CBA
CBA
CBA
A &A
GOA /UTL
0TH
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
0TH
A &A
A &A
A &A
0TH
A &A
CONT
CONT.
A &A
CBA
CBA
0TH
GOA /UTL
0TH.
CONT
GOA /UTL
A &A
CBA
A &A
CBA
CBA
CONT
CONT
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
CBA
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
CONT
CONT
I
Co-- ercia= Lrea Patrol
ient Statistics
1075
='
DATE
TII-,IE
INCIDENT
7j0n68nC
7/18/75
1450
Bicycle Theft
750063' - -'
7/18/75
1631
Vandalism
75006,80
7/18/75
1712
Car Fire
75006811
7/18/75,
1837
Shoplifter
75006313
7/18/75
1900
H &R P.D.Accident
7500c�335
7/19/75
0946
Alarm
5006843
7/19/75
1139
Alarm
75006350
7/19/75
1440
P.D.Accident
75001851
7/19/75
1527
Medical Emergency .
7500,6352
7/19/75
1527
Shoplifter's
7500&3 57
7/19/75
1911
Alarm
75GC1 33
7/20/75
1251
P.D.Accident
75001387
7/20/75
1535
Shoplifter
75006389
7/20/75
1601
P.D.Accident
1 0Cc390
7/20/75
1608
Medical Emergency
750 <0c�9_
7/20/75
1703
Shoplifter's
75033
7/20/75
1815
Bicycle Theft
7500c394
7/20/75
1839
Alarm
750o69O9
7/21/75
0208
Money Escort Request
15,001927
7/21/75
1459
Shoplifter
75&31937
7/21/75
1934
Theft from Auto
"750uc93;
7/21/75
2144
Alarm
75006940
7/21/75
2235
Bicycle Theft
75806959
7/22/75
1149
P.D.Accident
750�;696�'
7/22/75
1414
Susp.Person
75006967
7/22/75
1534
Shoplifter
/7006977
7/22/75
1842
Customer Trouble
t 50,06986
7/23/75
0023
DWI
750019;3
7/23/75
1147
H &R P.D.Accident
75007001
7/23/75
1341
Simple Assault
75007005
7/23/75
1508
Shoplifter
7500701/
T/23/75
1739
Theft- Motorcycle
75) 0:.7017
7/23/_75
1835
Theft - Billfold
75"x7020
7/23/75
2111
Fight
1 0?7022
7/23/75
2120
Poss.of Marijuana
15007023
7/23/75
2133
Lost /Stolen Property
750070 =7
7/24/75
1543
Auto Theft
7500705
7/24/75
2145
Shoplifter
7500706':
7/25/75
0246
Driving After Suspension
750,0'072
7/25/75
0941
Lost Wallet
7500 ?078
7/25/75
1433
Shoplifter
75007084
7/25/75
1746
Vandalism
75007120
7/26/75
1218
Alarm
':,5007129
7/26/75
1651
Exposer
75:07130
7/26/75
1710
P.D.Accident
75007-31
7/26/75
1754
Abandoned Trailer
750J'_3�
7/26/75
1859
Alarm
';50 713' --
7/26/75
7555
Poss.Forgery -Check
7/27/75
0033
Fire Alarm
Page 3
LOCATION
Southdale
Southdale Bowl
69th and France
Penney's
Turtle Lot
Cedric's
Midrise Apartments
Raccoon Lot
7151 York - #719
Donaldson's
Robinson's
72nd and France
Penney's
66th and York
Target
Penney's
Southdale
Penney's
McDonald's
Penney's
Southdale Parking Lot
Gabbert's
S'dale Bank Area -Bike
Rack
66th and France
Kangaroo Lot
Penney's
Target
67th and York
Red Owl
3401 Hazelton
Target
Tiger Lot
Shelley's Tall Girl
Southdale Bowl
Byerly's
Dayton's
Target
Hurrah's
7171 France
Southdale
Donaldson's
Dayton's Overflow Lot
Henn.County Library
7009 York
Perimeter Road
72nd and France
Radio Shack
After All
Dayton's - S'dale Sec.
DISP.
0TH
A &A
A &A
CBA
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
CBA
A &A
A &A
CBA
0TH
A &A
CBA
0TH
A &A
A &A
CBA
CONT
A &A
0TH
0TH
A &A
CBA,
GOA /UTL
CBA
A &A
CONT
CBA
CONT
CONT
A &A
CBA
A &A
CONT
CBA
0TH
A &A
CBA
CONT
A&A
CONT
0TH
A &A
A &A
CONT
A &A
Co =ercial Area Patrol
-incident Statistics
iu_y 1, 1975 - July 31, 1975.
Page 4
DATE
TIME
INCIDENT
LOCATION
DISP.
7/27/75
1435
Kids
69th and York
GOA /UTL
7/27/75
1446
Alarm
Southdale Texaco
A &A
7/27/75
1559
Shoplifter
Penney's
CIA
7/28/751 .
1509
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
7/28/75
1955
Forgery /Poss.Stolen
Sound of Music
CONT
Property
7/28/75
2205
Bench Warrant
Target
CBA
7/28/75
2343
Open Trunk
Key Cadillac
A &A
7/29/75
0156
Alarm
Donaldson's Car Care
A &A
7/29/75
0202
Susp.Vehicle
Key Cadillac
A &A
7/29/75
1557
. ATL- Vehicle
Southdale Ford
CONT-
7/30/75
0240
Vandalism
Southdale Bowl
EC
7/30/75
1250
Lost Property
Dayton's or Pkg.Lot
A &A
7/30/75
2054
Shoplifter's
Penney's
CBA
7/31/75
0117
DK Customer
Byerly's
A &A
7/31/75
0853
Alarm
3433 Hazelton
A &A
7/31/75
0923
Possible Exposure
Fox Lot
GOA /UTL
7/31/75
1330
Molesting
Turtle Lot
CONT
7/31/75
1747
Indecent Exposure
Southdale
CBA
7/31/75
1945
P.D.Accident
70th and France
0TH
D =--T ITION OF DISPOSITION CODINGS :
R:O_ Referred to Other Agency
&A Assisted and Advised
COi :T Continued
C -G /li!L• Gone on Arrival /Unable to Locate
i Unfounded
NTH Other
17A Cleared by. Arrest
EC Exceptional Clearance
I'iA inactive
VI ,�
DATE: August 6, 1975
TO:.- Jerry Dalen, Finance Director
FROM: Robert J. Buresh, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Bids on paramedic equipment
In my memorandum of June 18, 1975, to Warren C. Hyde; City Manager, regarding
the justification for the purchase of paramedic equipment, I listed certain
needs as
1 Recordi Annie at $878.00
and
2 Resusci Annies at $300.00 each.
This recommendation was based on a conversation with Dr. Lilja, who is our
professional advisor for this program. In a recent meeting which I had with
Dr.. Lilja, he has modified his recommendations and now feels that we should
purchase two of the Recordi Annies and not purchase any new Resusci Annies.
I have received bids from two suppliers which are as follows:
Armstrong Industries, Inc. $810.00 each
Viking Industrial Center $850.00 each
The Viking bid includes complete service and warranty for one year, a $30.00_
supply of recording paper, and a pair of spare lungs for each unit. 6-
Although I would normally recommend the purchase from the low.bidder on a
stock item such as this, I am inclined to think that consideration should be
given to the fact that Viking Industrial has a local service center for these
devices. In the past, we have had to have all of our training manikins repaired
by them, due to the heavy usage they receive. Viking also offers a loaner unit
when a unit is in for repair.
Armstrong Industries has no local repair facilities and must send the units
back to Chicago for repair. Any significant delay could jeopardize the
effectiveness of our community education programs, and we would also have to
pay for shipping costs to and from Chicago. Therefore, over a period of a few
years, with the maintenance which we anticipate due to heavy usage, I suspect
that the Viking price will be lower in the long run.
Please advise as to which company I should order from.
RJB /rah
FROM: Robert J. Buresh, Fire Chief
SUBJECT: Justification for Paramedic Program and Purchase of Equipment
I am pleased to report that our three firefighters, Dick Vernon, Bill
Lutts, Terry Kehoe, who are in training at Hennepin County General Hospital
have successfully completed approximately 2/3'6 of their training. In a recent
meeting which I had with Dr. Lilja from Hennepin County General, he stated that
we could be certified to become operational with our Paramedic Program by
August 1, 1975, if the trainees test out.ok and if there are no delays in pur-
chasing the necessary equipment.
JUSTIFICATION OF PARAMEDIC PROGRAM AND EQUIPMENT
At present, we are operating a rescue squad unit for the City of Edina
using firefighters who have been trained in all phasis of fire department
rescue squad procedures, automobile extracation, the advanced American Red Cross
course, and the Emergency Medical Technician (E.M.T.) training. All of our per-
sonnel have successfully passed the National Examination for Emergency Medical
Technicians.
Our ambulance and rescue calls for the year 1974 totaled 710 as compared
with 645 fire calls answered by the Department. The national statistics indi-
cate that approximately 12,000 deaths occur from fire annually, but 100,000
people die due to other accidents, and 24,000 of these could be saved by prompt
and effective medical care. There are 750,000 persons, the majority men, who
die annually of coronary heart disease, and 60% of these die before reaching
medical assistance. The medical profession estimates that approximately 30,000
of these could be saved with prompt, effective medical attention in the field.
Presently Edina has the only Fire Department in Hennepin County which
operates a rescue squad and ambulance service. As a result of your direction
Page 2
the City of Edina has in terms of emergency responses, placed a high priority
on emergency medical care and have considered it as a third public safety
service along side Police and Fire protection.
The involvement of our Fire Department in emergency medical services has
had more impact on the Department and its service to the people of Edina than
any other single program. In addition to providing the much needed public
service it has done much to raise the public image, through high public contact,
of both the Police and Fire Departments. We also feel that the cost of the
rescue squad operation is surprisingly low for the high return in services. Our
present program has proven itself to be one of the more successful programs in
the public safety division regarding increased productivity and effective
utilization of manpower.
Now that paramedic training has been made available to our department by
Hennepin County General Hospital, we are preparing ourselves for the next step
toward a complete emergency medical care service to the residents of Edina, a
fully trained and equipped paramedic team.
In order that we may develop more teamwork on emergency calls between the
Police and Fire Department personnel. I recommend that all patrolmen be
trained to the level of emergency medical technicians. Hennepin County General
will provide this 81 hour training course to all of our Public Safety person-
nel at no charge.
In addition to the cooperation it should build between the two departments
it will provide a higher level of service to the community. In most cases the
Police are first on the scene and frequently needed to assist with the victims.
Without this additional training it will be difficult to utilize the patrolmen
on many of our newer rescue techniques which we will be using shortly.
Page 3
NECESSARY EQUIPMENT TO BE PURCHASED FOR COMPLETE PARAMEDIC OPERATION
$4,231.85 Lifepak 4 Unit. A portable battery operated Cardioscope/
Defibrillator with ECG Recorder. *See attachment No. 1.
$ 740.00 Medical Anti Shock Trousers. Two sets at $320 each. *See
attachment No. 2.
$ 425.00 Robert Shaw Resuscitator Model No. 900 - 002 - 175 -03. *See
attachment No. 3.
$ 878.00 Recori- Annie. This is a sophisticated training manikin which
is necessary for training the Police and Firemen who will be
working as emergency medical technicians and assisting the
paramedics.
$ 600.00 Two Resusci- Annies at $300 each. These training manikins are
necessary for the classes we will be conducting in cardiopul-
monary resuscitation which will be offered to the residents of
Edina. We feel that the training of the public is a necessary
part of our new paramedic program. It will serve as a means of
exposing more residents to the paramedic service available to
them and also educate .them in lifesaving techniques which they
can use before the arrival of the paramedic team.
$ 240.00 Rental cost of necessary radio equipment at $40 per month for
six months. This equipment will be phased out some time prior
to January 1, 1976 when we will receive our permanent radio
equipment purchased through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
$ 40.00 Drug Bag
$ •250.00 Drugs and miscellaneous medical supplies.
$7,404.85 TOTAL
The above figure will represent the initial set up costs of the paramedic
program and the operating cost for 1975. The reoccurring costs will be approxi-
• Page 4
mately $2•,000 to $2,500 per year for drugs, misc. supplies and the replacement
of equipment most of which is considered to have a usable life of 3 to 5
years depending on the amount of usage.
I would like to call to your attention the fact that we will be receiving
approximately $8,000 to $9,000 worth of radio equipment at no cost which is
being purchased through the Robert Johnson Foundation. This equipment should..
be delivered to us some time before the end.of the year. We will incur an un-
going cost of approximately $220 per year for the permanent ambulance radio
and approximately.$100 per year for the UHF Telemetry portable radio for the
use of this equipment. This money will be set aside by Hennepin County and
will be used to replace the original equipment which is being donated.to us.
`through the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. I think that it is also worth-
while mentioning that there is no charge to the City of Edina for the training
of our paramedics.. Our present plans are for six firefighters to receive this.
specialized training from Hennepin County General Hospital under the direction
of Dr. Lilja. Each man will receive approximately 400 hours combined class -
room and practical experience training. If this service was not made avails
ble to us on a no cost basis we would incur a cost of approximately $2,500
per paramedic to have him trained at a private institution or college.
M
9
S
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest
that the City of Edina acquire additional land for public recreational,
park, and playground purposes; and
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish such purpose, it is necessary for
the City of Edina to acquire the real property described in Exhibit A attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof;
WHEREAS, it is necessary and advisable that such acquisition proceed
as diligently as possible, and that all reasonable effort be made to acquire
all such properties by direct negotiation and purchase if possible, and by
the use of eminent domain if necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the City of Edina proceed
to acquire as soon as possible all of the properties described in said Exhibit
A for the purposes above set out, such acquisition to be by direct negotia-
tion and purchase if possible, and under its right of eminent domain if
necessary, and that the City Attorney and the Mayor, Manager, and Clerk of
the City be and they hereby are instructed and directed to take all necessary
action to acquire such properties by direct negotiation and purchase if pos -.
sible, and by the use of the power of eminent domain if necessary, including,
in connection with any such eminent domain proceeding, the filing of all
necessary petitions therefor, and to prosecute all such eminent domain pro-
ceedings to a conclusion or until abandoned, dismissed, or terminated by the
City or by the Court; that the City Attorney, the Mayor, Manager, and Clerk
do all things necessary to be done in the acquisition and.purchase of said
properties and in the commencement, prosecution, and successful termination
of any such eminent domain proceeding.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Edina this
day of , 1975.
EXHIBIT A
Tract 1
The property known as the Cahill School Addition, consisting of 18 acres in
Plat 73608, Parcels 2100, 2109 205, and 0500, lying generally south of Cahill
School and west of Amundsen Drive, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision
dedication.
Tract 2
The property known as Lincoln Drive Flood Plain, consisting of approximately
29 acres, in Plat 73731, Parcels 4400 and 4210, and in Plat 73730, Parcel
0520, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision dedication.
Tract 3
The property known as Garden Park Addition, consisting of approximately
10.08 acres, in Outlot 1 of Edina Parklands, and in Garden Park, Parcels 4000,
4500, 5500, and 6200.
Tract 4
The property known as Karl Krahl's Hill, consisting of approximately 9.2
acres and located in the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 31, Township 117, Range 21, being Plat 73731, Parcels
1015, 2230, and 2240.
Tract 5
The property known as the Moore Property on Melody Lake, consisting of approxi-
mately 4.9 acres in Plat 73733, Parcel 1600.
Tract 6
The property knoon as the Hedberg Property, consisting of 12 to 15 acres,
and located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
of the South Half, Section 32, Township 28, Range 24, being in Plat 73832,
Parcel 2800, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision dedication.
s
Tract 7
The property known as McCauley Trail South, consisting of approximately 10.67
acres, described as Lot 1, Block 5, McCauley Heights 3rd Addition; Outlot A
of Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition; part of Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 196; and Outlot B, Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition.
Tract 8
The property known as the Moore Property on Mirror Lake, consisting of ap-
proximately 13 acres in Plat 73729, Parcels 4000 and 5400.
Tract 9
The property known as the Rutledge Park House, consisting of approximately
.2 acre, being Lot 7, Block 13, Cleveland Subdivision.
-2-
`tq�>
STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
CENTENNIAL OFFICE BUILDING
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55145
September 2., 1975
Mr. Donald F. Monk
Yorktown Apartments
Northern Federal Building
Capitol Center Plaza
St'. Paul, .Minnesota 551,02
In re: Application #263474
Dear Mr. Monk:
We have received ".an.application for reduc.tion °in assessed
valuation of _re'al estate located in. the :City- Hof- ,Ed:ina-F
.Hennepin County, Minnesota, which has been referred to this
office by the County Auditor and County Board. The - property
is described as follows:
Plat 78125, Parcel 3600
The application states that the Heqnepin County Board of
Equalization recommended reduction of the 1974 assessment.
The application requests that the assessed valuation for the
assessment year 1-974, taxes payable in 197.5, be reduced from
$1,14.0,000 to $1.,066,400.
Since-the reduction in assessed valuation•.exceeds.$50, '.000, a
hearing is required`by Statute. This hearing will be held
September 23,1975, at 1:30 p.m. in Room 202 -of the Centennial
Office Building, St. Paul, Minnesota.
S'ncerely,
GERALD W. PAHL
Res:earch:Attorney
GWP : dw
cc: Mr. Vernon T.. Hoppe, Hennepin County Auditor
Mr. Robert W. Martin, Hennepin County Assessor
Mr. Kent Swanson, Edina City Assessor
Mrs. Florence Hallberg, Edina City Clerk
Mr. Jack Brown, Edina School District Clerk
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS,' the following described property is at present a single tract
of land:
Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's Second Rearrangement
Rolling Green; and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ")_ described as follows:
That part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's Second Re-
arrangement Rolling Green lying West of the East 110.0 feet of
Lots 5 and 6 as measured at right angles to the East line of Lot
6 and its Northerly extensions; and
That part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Gunnar Johnson's Second Re-
arrangement Rolling Green except that part lying West of the East
110.0 feet of Lots 5 and 6 as measured at right angles to the East
line of Lot 6 and its Northerly extensions; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hard-
ship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere
with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained
in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City
of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate
tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions
of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow
said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are
not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof,
and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be
made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1975.
RF.gnT.TTTTnN
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract
of land:
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Third Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Third Addition, lying South-
westerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the
Northwesterly line of Lot 3, a distance of 50.23 feet Southwesterly
from the most Northerly corner thereof; thence Southeasterly to a point
on the Southeasterly line of Lot 3, a distance of 50.23 feet South-
westerly from the most Easterly corner thereof; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Third Addition, except that part lying
Southwesterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point
on the Northwesterly line of Lot 3, a distance of 50.23 feet South-
westerly from the most Northerly corner thereof; thence Southeasterly
to a point on the Southeasterly line of Lot 3, a distance of 50.23
feet Southwesterly from the most Easterly corner thereof; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the
purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City
of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved, by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate
tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions
of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow
said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are
not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof,
and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be
made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this
Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of.
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of Sept-
ember 8, 1975, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 23rd day of September, 1975.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
HEATHER HILL
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Heather Hill ", platted. by John H. Wright.and Mary I
Wright, husband and wife, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of
September 8, 1975, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ,
ADOPTED this 8th day of.September, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 8,
1975, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day of September, 1975.
City Clerk
R]
BE IT RESOLVED by the
certain plat entitled
McCauley, single, and
ember 8, 1975, be and
,SOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT OF
MC CAULEY HEIGHTS 5TH ADDITION
City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
"McCauley Heights 5th Addition ", platted by Betty J.
presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of Sept -
is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 8th day of September, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
Minnesota, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 8,
1975, and as recorded in the minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 9th day•of September, 1975.
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
Tract 1
The property known as the Cahill School Addition, consisting of 18 acres in
Plat 73608, Parcels 2100, 210, 205, and 0500, lying generally south of Cahill
School and west of Amundsen Drive, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision
dedication.
Tract 2
The property known as Lincoln Drive Flood Plain, consisting of approximately
29 acres, in Plat 73731, Parcels 4400 and 4210, and in Plat 73730, Parcel
0520, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision dedication.
Tract 3
The property known as Garden Park Addition, consisting of approximately
10.08 acres, in Outlot 1 of Edina Parklands, and in Garden Park, Parcels 4000,
4500, 5500, and 6200.
Tract 4
The property known as Karl Krahl's Hill, consisting of approximately 9.2
acres and located in the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 31, Township 117, Range 21, being Plat 73731, Parcels
1015, 2230, and 2240.
Tract 5
The property known as the Moore Property on Melody Lake, consisting of approxi-
mately 4.9 acres in Plat 73733, Parcel 1600.
Tract 6
The property knwon as the Hedberg Property, consisting of 12 to 15 acres,
and located in the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
of the South Half, Section 32, Township 28, Range 24, being in Plat 73832,
Parcel 2800, to the extent not to be acquired by subdivision dedication.
. /
Tract 7
The property known as McCauley Trail South, consisting of approximately 10.67
acres, described as Lot 1, Block 5, McCauley Heights 3rd Addition; Outlot A
of Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition; part of Lot 8, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 196; and Outlot B, Indian Hills Arrowhead Addition.
Tract 8
The property known as the Moore Property on Mirror Lake, consisting of ap-
proximately 13 acres in Plat 73729, Parcels 4000 and 5400.
Tract 9
The property known as the Rutledge Park House, consisting of approximately
.2 acre, being Lot 7, Block 13, Cleveland Subdivision.
-2-
- - -I - -- a - - -•••• •••• +•+•• ++ IUA U&Iucu VVUU1U ultursecL Lne w
line of Lot 4 at a pt 18 rods S from the NW cor thereof, to
a pt in a line running N parallel with the.E line of Lot 4
from the pt of beginning, thence S to beginning, Ex road.
(5.02-acres)
i
i
e
r�
Sw �-
d s=ue -
-16.21 acres - -- -- — - - - -- - -- - - -r
_ � '
th
•',,
- --
pt of the NL of SWk of SW ' lying ''
� ying Wly of.Mirror Lakes in
Edina and Sly of Mirror Lake Plat No..Y
ex road
— -
I
Com at a pt in the S line of Lot 4 dis 978 510 ft'W from -
SE cor there, thence E 368 ft thence N 20 rods, thence
NWly to a pt distance 47 rods V from E line of Lot 4 and - - -;` =-
40 rods S from the N line thereof, thence W 3 rods, thence
II
- - -I - -- a - - -•••• •••• +•+•• ++ IUA U&Iucu VVUU1U ultursecL Lne w
line of Lot 4 at a pt 18 rods S from the NW cor thereof, to
a pt in a line running N parallel with the.E line of Lot 4
from the pt of beginning, thence S to beginning, Ex road.
(5.02-acres)
i
i
Of
4j24�
ZZL-
1
ol
PLAT NO. 73731 2240
PARCEL NO.
Com at pt of intersec of S line of furl j and 'line sine of U. c. Hy 'o. 169 th E along said line 20�
65/100 ft th Y 020 59' 'rl 85 ft th N 41° 40, W to
SEly lire of aforesaid Hwy th Sally along said Hwy
to beg. ( et
7 /lC0 Ac)
PLAT NO. 73731 PARCEL NO. 2230
Com at a pt in S lire of SW 4 dis 204 65/100 ft E
from SEly line of U. S. Hwy No. 169 th N 02 59' w
85 ft th D 41 40' W to SEly line of aforesaid Hwy.
th vEly along said Hwy line to N line of S 18 rods
of 'Y' 20 reds of E 60 rods of SW 4 th E to NE cor
thereof th S to SE cor th--reoi Lh `ni to beg. ( .95 Ac)
y - -74 20 ec-� -r N *osoaj
44:V34 r LAJ,
i`
SITE
;;PDEU PARK
Out lot 1
Lot 5
Parcel (4000)
(4500)
(5500)
(6200)
APPENDIX D
ACREAGE AND ASSESSED V
ALUES
AC-`S
4.65
5.43 $ 30,000
'G PROPERTY 12 -15
acres
SCHOOL ADDITIOPd
i 18 acres
� DRIVE FLOODPLAI "l
29 acres
"Ind
.1dings
'assessed market value
' aPPr'oximate value
'S
,
-VALUES
18,000
39,100 (18,000 L + 21,100 g
36,000 )
18,000
141,100 (120,000 L t
21,100 g)
$ 15,000
11,000
150,000 (90,000 L t 60,000 B)
75,000
251,000 191,000 L
t 60,000 B)::
$174,000
40,000
214,000��.�
$185,000
$ 73,000 (55,000 L t 18,000
$ 20,500 (9,000 L + 11,500 B
TOTAL $884,600
10.08
'aULEY TRAIL S
dock 5, Lot 1
Outlot A
.46
Outlot B
1.06
Lot 8
5.74
.41
4.6-7
! "I HILL
rarcel (1015)
(2230)(2240
7.73
1.47
9.20
- MIRROR LAKE
:ar'cel (5400)(4000)
13.
- MELODY
-arcele 0 1
_
"DGE HOUSE
4.90 (3.80 L 1.10
.2
'G PROPERTY 12 -15
acres
SCHOOL ADDITIOPd
i 18 acres
� DRIVE FLOODPLAI "l
29 acres
"Ind
.1dings
'assessed market value
' aPPr'oximate value
'S
,
-VALUES
18,000
39,100 (18,000 L + 21,100 g
36,000 )
18,000
141,100 (120,000 L t
21,100 g)
$ 15,000
11,000
150,000 (90,000 L t 60,000 B)
75,000
251,000 191,000 L
t 60,000 B)::
$174,000
40,000
214,000��.�
$185,000
$ 73,000 (55,000 L t 18,000
$ 20,500 (9,000 L + 11,500 B
TOTAL $884,600
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6219
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT N0. A -173
LOCATION: Valley View Road,for Southdale Office Center
CONTRACTOR: Riegger Roadways, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT,:
$6,014.73
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (147.)
842.06
$6,856.79
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:_
25.00
$6,881.79
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5 %:
From: September 16, 1974 .
To: September 8, 1975
357 dyas @ $0.94 per day
335.59
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . $7,217.38
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT — $14,400.74 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ 7,217.38 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$7,217.38
COUNTY'CHARGE: 1 Parcel @ $0.50 each parcel
.50
$7,217.88
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS- 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479
days)
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 THRU 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF
ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6219
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT. NO. A -174
LOCATION: West 56th Street from Bernard Place to Dale Avenue
CONTRACTOR: Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$3,415.54
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (14 %)
478.18
$3,893.72
Work Order #69649 - Victor Carlson &
Sons
100.00
$3,993.72
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
15.00
$4,008.72
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: November 18, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
294 days @ $0.55 per day
160.26
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . $4,168.98
ASSESSABLE FEET - 453.15
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT -
$14.46 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT -
$ 9.20 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$4,168.98
COUNTY CHARGE: 6 Parcels @ $0.50
each parcel
3.00
$4,171.98
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 THRU 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
FOR: CURB & GUTTER B -82
LOCATION: 4379 Coolidge Ave.
Payment made to St. Louis Park:
Bituminous mat - 40 feet @ $6.24 per -foot $249.60
Concrete curb and gutter - 40 feet @.$4.16 per foot 166.40
$416.00
Less City share - 507. 208.00
$208.00
CLERICAL - 2% 4.16
$212.16
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: November 13, 1972
To: September 8, 1975
1029 days @ $0.03 per day 30.87
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . • $243.03
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT — $243.03 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST $243.03
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Parcel @ $0.25 each parcel .25
$243.28
TO BE SPREAD OVER 5 YEARS - 1976 thru 1980
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6218
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -182
LOCATION: Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to South
Line of Hyde Park
CONTRACTOR: Riegger Roadways, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT:. '$71,978.02
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (10 %) 7,197.80
$79,175.82
State Aid Share: 48,796.07_
$30,379.75
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 50.00
$30,429.75
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From August 19, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
.385 days @ $4.17 per day 12605.45
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,035.20
ASSESSABLE UNITS - .2,669.60 feet
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
ASSESSABLE COST: $32,035.20.
COUNTY CHARGE: 14 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel 7.00
$32,042.20
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6218
FOR:. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -191
LOCATION: Tara Road from Kemrich Drive north to-cul -de -sac
CONTRACTOR: Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $7,126.80
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (14 %) 997.75
$8,124.55
W.O. #63231 - Doc Blanchard Enterprises 157.20
W.O. #309 (Oiling) 1,064.23
$9,345.98
• PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 25.00
$9,370.9.8
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: June 17, 1974
To:. September 8, 1975
448 days .@ $1.28 per day 573.42
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . $9,944.40
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 5
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT $1,302.59 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT.
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $1,988.88 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT,
ASSESSABLE COST $92944.40
COUNTY CHARGE: 5 Parcels @ .$0.50 each parcel 2.50
$9,946.90
TO BE SPREAD OVER 1O.YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST. FIGURED @.5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 .days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6218
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -198
LOCATION: Brookview Avenue from West 58th Street south and
west to West 59th Street cul -de -sac
CONTRACTOR: Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company
CONTRACT AMOUNT.: $18,995.63
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12%) 2,279.48
$21,275.11
W.O. #68279 - G. L. Contracting, Inc. 203.10
$21,478.21
PUBLISHING AND CLERICAL 35.00
$21,513.21
CAPITALIZED -INTEREST @ 57.
From: June 17, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
448 days @ $2.95 per day 1,318.38
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST. . . . . . ..... . . . . . $22,831.59
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 1,558.47 feet
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $16.61 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $14.65 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT
ASSESSABLE COST: $22,831.59
COUNTY CHARGE: 24 Parcels @ $0.50 each.parcel 12.00
$22,843.59
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: August 19, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
385 days @ $4.29 per day 1,651.65
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,978.96
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2,320.75 feet (RI)
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1,201.08 feet (PRDs)
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $ 8.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (R -1)
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT --$12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (PRD -3)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ 8.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (R -1)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT -(PRD -3)
ASSESSABLE COST: $32,978.96
COUNTY CHARGE: 4 Parcels @.$0.50 each parcel 2.00
$32,980.96
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
LEVY.NO. 6221
FOR: GRADING & GRAVELLING N0. C -115
LOCATION: Olinger Blvd. from Olinger Road to County Road 158
CONTRACTOR: J. A. Danens & Sons, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$10,279.62
CONTRACT AMOUNT: (Terry Bros. Inc.)
15,816.36
$26,095.98
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (10%)
2,609.60
$28,705.58
#66875 - Soil Engineering Services, Inc.
1,552.50
#58843 -.Soil Engineering Services, Inc.
277.50
#58473- Soil Engineering Services, Inc.
7,279.00
#60320 - Soil Engineering Services, Inc.
7,270.03
#68512 - Brown Engineering Testing
375.00
.
Transfer from C -112A (Fill Material)
Contract Cost: $27,684.00
Engineering Cost: 2,768.40
30,452.40
$75,912.01
Less portion charged to State Aid
44,634.70
$31,277.31
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
50.00
$31,327.31.
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: August 19, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
385 days @ $4.29 per day 1,651.65
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $32,978.96
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 2,320.75 feet (RI)
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1,201.08 feet (PRDs)
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $ 8.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (R -1)
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT --$12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (PRD -3)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ 8.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT (R -1)
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT $12.00 PER ASSESSABLE FOOT -(PRD -3)
ASSESSABLE COST: $32,978.96
COUNTY CHARGE: 4 Parcels @.$0.50 each parcel 2.00
$32,980.96
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
FOR: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. E -29
LOCATION: Creek Valley Road cul -de -sac at east side
of Edina -West School property
CONTRACTOR: Minnesota Valley Surfacing Company.
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $12,870.24
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL:' (12 %) 1,544.43
$14,414.67
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$14,449.67
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: May 20, 1974.
To: September 8, 1975
476 days @ $1.98 per day 942.48
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $15,392.15
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $ 6,497.55 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED .ASSESSMENT - $15,392.15 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $15,392.15
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Parcel @ $.50 each parcel .50
$15,392.65
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
0
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 57. OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF.ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6214
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 264 -A
LOCATION: West 78th Street between Cahill Road and Cecilia Circle
CONTRACTOR: Suburban Sewer and Water,
Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$63,125.83
Assessed Sanitary Sewer No. 264
40,927.03
$22,198.80
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (10%)
2,219.88
$24,418.68
Less Bloomington share:
8,010.66
$16,408.02
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
35.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
. .
• $16,443.02
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 440
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT —
$37.43 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT -
$37.37 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$16,443.02
COUNTY COST: Number of parcels undetermined
until allocated
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 57. OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO., 309 -
LOCATION: Brookside Terrace from Motor Street to 675' South
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting Co., Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (127o)
#80515 - Minnesota Tree, Inc.
#69045 - David L. & Susan D. Fleming - Easement
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
LEVY NO. 6214
$17,451.63
2.094.20
$19,545.83
160.00
2,000.00
$21,705.83
50.00
$21,755.83
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: November 18, 1974
To: September 8,.1975 873.21
293 days @ $2.98 per day
$22
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST • • • • • ,629.04
5.3j 3.02
HOUSE SERVICE . . . . . . . . . . $279962.06
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 7
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $39955.75 PER ASSESSABLE .UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $3,232.72 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT *P1us.House Service
$27,962.06
ASSESSABLE COST:
3.50
COUNTY CHARGE: 7 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel $27 ,.965.56
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
* House Service 567.26
4425 Brookside Terrace $1090.68
4433 Brookside Terrace .850.20
4437 Brookside Terrace 992.71
4501 Brookside Terrace 400.00
4515 Brookside Terrace 1432.17
4517 Brookside Terrace
5 33.
F.
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 313
LOCATION: West 65th St. from 150' + west of.Drew Ave. to 435' +
due west; thence southwesterly 165' ±; thence southerly
to existing trunk sewer manhole. Also correcting flowage
easter;u frp, Barrie Road to Xerxes Avenue
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting Company
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $155,318.38
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (9 %) 13,978.65
$169,297.03
#66397
- Soil Engineering Services
279.25
#66961
- Giles W. & Mary B. Lucker
5,000.00
#67608
- Giles W.,Lucker and Edina Realty, Inc.
41,490.07
#67732
- Sahr, Kunert, Tambornino & Sushnik
250.00
#67954
- Brown Engineering Testing
280.29
#67955
- C. E. Coulter & Associates, Inc.
162.00
#68428
- Dorsey, Marquardt, Windhorst, West & Halladay
257.75
#68277
- C. E. Coulter & Associates, Inc.
264.00
#68459
- Minnesota Gas Company
6.03
#68518
- Northern States Power Company
600.00
#68788
- Barber Construction Company
885.00
#69223
- City of Edina
10.19
#69224
- Larry's Landscaping
3,173.50
#69225
- City of Richfield
6.00
#69226
- Roy Peterson
105.00
#69394
- Edina Electric Company
253.20
#69541
- G. L. Contracting
244.63
#70248
- C. E. Coulter & Associates
320.00
#70139
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Company
12.80
#70472
- Floyd Lock & Safe Company
35.10
#70578
- City of Richfield
9.00
470577
- City of Edina
4.16
#71032
- Dorsey, Marquardt, Windhorst, West & Halladay
132.50
#71157
- Betty Morey - Damages
100.00
#71763
- City of Richfield - Sewer'Service
10.00
#72057
- Hennepin County Finance Director - taxes
494.79 .
Interest
149.84
#72188
- City of Edina - water
3.12
#72428
- B H K & R - insurance
31.00
#72091
- Dorsey, Marquardt, Windhorst, West & Halladay
480.75
Twin City Federal Savings & Loan Assn.- payments
4,133.08.
Sale of property (6444 -46 Xerxes Ave. S.)
Earnest money
$5,000.00
Cash on closing
11,100.36
Contract For Deed
16,282.32(32,382.68)
#72694
- Minneapolis Gas Company - service
115.78
#72641
- City of Edina
1.00
#80015
- Sherwin Williams Company
442.05
#80285.-
G. L. Contracting, Inc. -,Parking Area & Sodding
450.75
#80204
- Dorsey, Marquardt, Windhorst, West & Halladay
180.00
Lamb Plumbing and Heating
2,918.30
Electric Repair & Construction
641.43
$200,846.71
PUBLISHING'AND SUPPLIES: 100.00
$200,946.71
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: July 15, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
420 days @.$27.52 per day 11,561.97
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2129508.68
I
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT PAGE 2
Sanitary Sewer No.313 (Continued)
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 2,033.79 Sac Units
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $150.2268 PER ASSESSABLE SAC UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $104.4887 PER ASSESSABLE SAC UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $212,508.68
COUNTY CHARGE: 217 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel 108.50
$212,617.18
. e
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYAGLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT- $196.22467 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $209.19 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $80,538.15
COUNTY CHARGE: Number of parcels to be determined after
allocation on Braemar Hills 7th
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
LEVY NO. 6214
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 314
LOCATION: West 78th Street from 1140 feet west to Cahill Road
west to south City Limits
CONTRACTOR:- G. L. Contracting, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT:.
$67,835.27
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (10 %)
6,783.53
$74,618.80
Edina's share of cost-incurred by Bloomington- Sub - Trunk
Construction 1972
20,809.22
$95,428.02
Less amount proposed to be assessed by Bloomington
15,303.15
$80,124.87
W.O. #71492 - Brown Engineering
1,065.27
$81,190.14
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
75.00
$81,265.14
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5% -
From: November 18, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
294 days @ $11.13 per day
3,273.01
$84,538.15
Less Lateral Connections - 4
4,000.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . $80,538.15
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 385
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT- $196.22467 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $209.19 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $80,538.15
COUNTY CHARGE: Number of parcels to be determined after
allocation on Braemar Hills 7th
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 315
LOCATION: Gleason Road from .south line of Hyde Park Addition
to West 78th Street
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $37,874.76
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (11 %) 4,166.22 .
$42,040.98
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES':- 50.00
$42,090.98
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: August 19, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
385 days @ $5.76 per day 2,217.50
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST. . . . . . . . • . .$44,308.48
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 32
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $1,163.42 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $1,384.64 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $44,308.48
COUNTY CHARGE: 25 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel 12.50
$44,320.98
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR.PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6214
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 317
LOCATION: Easement line in Mirror Lake Plat No.3 from existing
sanitary sewer at Lake Ridge Road cul -de -sac to
serve property south of Mirror Lake Plat No.3
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting,.Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $18,886.66
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12 %) 2,266.40
$21,153.06
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$21,188.06
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: October 21, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
322 days @ $2.90 per day, 933.69
$22,121.75
Lateral Assessment - Lot 3, Blk.l, Mirror Lakes Plat No.3 1,500.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . • $20,621.75
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 25 Lots
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $812.14 PER ASSESSABLE LOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $824.87 PER ASSESSABLE LOT
$20,621.75.
1.50
$20,623.25
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE: 3 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6212
FOR STORM SEWER NO. 134
LOCATION: 403 Monroe Avenue
EXTRAORDINARY BENEFIT $417.30
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . $417.30
ASSESSABLE UNIT - 1
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $417.30 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST $417.30
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Parcel @ $.50 each parcel .50
$417.80
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479.days).
ANALYSIS OF- ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6212
FOR: STORM SEWER NO. 137
LOCATION: Gleason Road from 800'
north of West 78th Street to
West 78th Street; West
78th Street from Gleason Road
- east to Marth Road
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting, Inc.
$36,894.14
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (11 %)
4,058.36
$40,952.50
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
50.00
$41,002.50
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: December 16, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
1,494.94
266 days @ $5.62 per day
TOTAL . CONSTRUCTION COST . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
$42,497.44
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 1,538,703
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT
- $0.0317751 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
- $0.027619 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
$42,497.44
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE: 46 Parcels @
$0.50 each parcel
23.00
$42,520.44
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6212
FOR: STORM SEWER NO. 139
LOCATION: Gleason Road from Dewey Hill Road to approximately
900 feet south of the south line of Hyde Park Drive
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$119635.84
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL (12 %)
1,396.30
$13,032.14
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
.35.00
$13,067.14
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: September 16, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
357 days @ $1.79 per day
639.06
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .
$13,706.20
. ASSESSABLE UNITS - 725,261 square feet
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $0.02646 PER ASSESSABLE
SQUARE FOOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $0.0188983 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$13,706.20
COUNTY CHARGE: 32 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel
16.00
$13,722.20
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31
(479 days)
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6212
FOR: STORM SEWER NO. 141
LOCATION: Across France Avenue just south of West 44th Street;
also,from alley between Sunnyside Road and West 44th
Street just west of France Avenue west to ponding area
CONTRACTOR: Rauenhorst Corporation
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$3,953.23
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12 %)
474.39
$4,427.62
W.O. #69337 - Jerry's Hardware Supplies
11.85
$4,439.47
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
15.00
$4,454.47
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: September 16, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
359 days @ $0.61 per day
219.09
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . .
$4,673.56
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 349,896 sauare feet
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $0.055206 PER ASSESSABLE SQUARE
FOOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $0.013357.PER ASSESSABLE-SQUARE
FOOT
ASSESSABLE COST: $4,673.56
COUNTRY CHARGE: 32 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel 16.00.
$4,.689.56
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN .19:76
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)-
ANALYSIS.OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6216
FOR: WATERMAIN NO. 288
LOCATION: West 78th Street from Glasgow Drive to the South City Limits;
Gleason Road from West 78th Street to the South line of Hyde
Park Addition
CONTRACTOR: G. L. Contracting, Inc.
CONTRACT AMOUNT: Lateral Trunk Total
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (10 %)
Add Edina's share of Bloomington Con-
struction
Less Bloomington share of cost
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
$55,935.66 $29,582.75
5,593.57 2,958.27 .
$61,529.23 $32,541.02
6,740.48
$61,529.23 $39,281.50
8,28.3.21
$53,246.02 $39,281.50
50.00 35.00
$53,296.02 $30,316.50
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: August 19,1974
To: September. 8, 1975
385 days @ $12.69 per day 2,810.60 2,076.14
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . ... . . . . $56,106.62 $41,392.64
ASSESSABLE UNITS: , 38 437
$85,518.41
8,551.84
$94,070.25
6.740.48
$100,810.73
8,283.21
$ 92,527.52
85.00
$92,612.52
4,886.74
$97,499.26
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $1,383.89 $98.788 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT -. $1,476.49 $94.72 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE: Number of parcels undetermined until
allocation made to Braemar Hills Seventh
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
$97,499.26
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 321
LOCATION: 6021 Vernon Ave. S.
PAYMENT to Blake Ridge Associates
(Connection Charge) $901.50
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (5 %) 45.08
$946.58
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 57.
From: May 19, 1975
To: September 8, 1975
81 days @ $0.13 per day 10.53
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $957.11
ASSESSABLE UNITS:- 1
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - 100% Petition
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $957.11 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $957.11
COUNTY CHARGE 1 Parcel @ $0.50 each parcel .50
$957.61
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days)
FOR: WATERMAIN NO. 291
LOCATION: 100% Petition on 6021 Vernon Avenue S.
PAYMENT TO BLAKE RIDGE ASSOCIATES
$901.50
(Connection Charge)
45.08
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (5 %)
$946.58
-CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: May 19, 1975
To: September 8, 1975
10.53
81 days @.$0.13 per day,
• • • •
$957.11
TOTALCONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . ... • • • • • • • • •_ • •
ASSESSABLE UNIT - 1'
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - 100% Petition
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $957.11 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
$.957.11
ASSESSABLE COST:
COUNTY CHARGE: 1 Parcel @ $0.50 each parcel
.50
$957.61
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST'YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975. TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
@ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479 days
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED
t
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6334
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 316
LOCATION:` Lanham Lane from 245 feet north of Kemrich Drive
to 870 feet north of Kemrich Drive
CONTRACTOR: Rauenhorst Corporation .
$6,149.03
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12 %)
737.88
$6,886.91
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
25.00
$6,911.91
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: August 19, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
365.73
385 days @ $0.95 per day
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . • • • . .
• $7,277.64
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 12 Lots
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $1,055.72 PER ASSESSABLE LOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ 606.47 PER ASSESSABLE LOT
ASSESSABLE COST.
$7,277.64
COUNTY CHARGE: 12 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel
6.00
$7,283.64
TO BE SPREAD OVER 3 YEARS - 1976 thru 1978
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.31 (479
days)
(SAPP 60) T£'.T Mls ZddIONIlld 'IVIOZ 30 %s o Qallfl9Id ZSS2Ia1NI S,lldax Isuia
9L61 NI Q21037I00 S3XV1 SL61 HZIM S'ISa'xdd TV-3x ZS2iId
8L6T nag1 9L61 - SUM £ MAO (IV3ddS 38 OZ
ZT'06L`S$
00'9
Taoaed goea OS'0$ e) sTaoaed ZT :20TVHO uNnOO
ZT'*78L`S$
:ZSOO 3'IS'dSs3sSd
JDI zggvss3Ssd ll3d. TO'Z847$ - INHHISS3SSH QHSOd011d
.
W7 3'I9HSSSSSV '83d 68'4789$ - ZNUKSS3SSd Q31VKIZS3
9:101 ZT - SIMI ZlgVSSSSSd
ZT'+78L`SS
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOIZOnliSSNOO 'IdJDI
Vi'Z£T (vVT# camas ma03s)
*7Z' T ZLs
c
(96'LLO`SO %ST'S£ = LL'OS :uoTITPPV PuooaS sTTTH
loodsoad s,uosgor •d IN - V-joT2nO of aTgva8avgo ssal
9£'99£`6$
ZT'96£
Cep cad £Z'T$ 0 sfeP ZZ£
.
+7M 18 aagmajdas :oy
Vt6T `TZ aago3oo :woad
° /.S P) isnaZNI anriviiavO
47Z'096`
8$
0019Z
: MladnS QNV ONIHSI'IHnd
1iZ'S£6`8
S£ 'L56
( %ZT) VIVOIXTIO QNV 9NIUMIJN3
68'LL6`L$
:iNnoxv love Noo
uoTieaodaoo 29aoguaneg :WIDV INOO
aATaQ goT=Ia?I 3o glaou Jaa3 OL8
o:i aAT,a goTamax 3o glaou iaa3 SVZ moa3 auvl meguel :NOIIVDOZ
9£T 'ON llamas mHolS doa
S££9 'ON AA3'I
ZNUNss3Ssd 30 SISx'IdNd
I
TO BE SPREAD OVER 3 YEARS 1976 thru 1978
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES .1.31 (479 days)
ANALYSIS
OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY N0. 6333
FOR: WATERMAIN NO. 289
LOCATION: Lanham Lane from 245 feet
north of Kemrich Drive to 870
feet
north of Kemrich Drive
CONTRACTOR: Rauenhorst Corporation
CONTRACT AMOUNT:
$7,603.60
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12 %)
912.43
$8,516.03
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
25.00
$8,541.03
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5 %:
From: October 21, 1974
To: September 8, 1975
322 days @,$1.17 per day
376.77
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . $8,917.80
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 12 Lots
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT
- $908.70 PER ASSESSABLE LOT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
- $743.15.PER ASSESSABLE LQT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$8,917.80
COUNTY CHARGE: 12 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel
6.00
$8,923.80
TO BE SPREAD OVER 3 YEARS 1976 thru 1978
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES .1.31 (479 days)
� ;_.i
�'�.. -_�
.w�
���cG pT rp /v5 OF
�El�' Cyr' T ro,v
14 l.iT"}{ 02 I Tom%
+' C71Jc::/!T /C�j. („� �l"�f�f�/V►7[ %Vl�f i �r?7 /L +/
,r �' fly �'7 7CI��L t��!?-N:)WCY r''�.alft,7
vitA.A (r(/TD F'Ft:r1 /L��
C lu1S TJ.2r�c� wry E- Nn�7L�/
C, R.O Ltl T H C �`� L CC/-1 O L t ivl�
�, c 4a1
cv�/�YTIf /ti! YOV El��,e t��9
t`�uGRyTftirary
Kru0Li p-00uT T A-) w E
j:� fhtiu�J ri�3v�-r t' .r �- f«,c
S, t T�(
Uizuc. VC-.a' -'Q u-r c..��fic fly w4fo
OJZv6 L^uc
Cs�vC,
To A�t� - STcuc L.�P cn;gl<t
T° AsK
TH
; A LU E S Ci � Cft-t-7 n ,J _ /�
! <i_ � A;
f-ZCL� (�-7` r,�/ E: r
t,4= 2,f} STU t� C''vT
Cam`,
A L l tJ e
-
1
S7 C/`
--'
c V I k r U -- Liz S s
Ld .? C, s /n1 /l1 /i is l �l �.
! 1J !"')Fr /Q fC got R G • r=
S�u�:nlSc���w/,�
S. L tL�2TJL•t1
Ccv. /1c.f[iv r-. Sa.vl�f.�,a /I.'c /r.�;-
43LE AQs4 rr) - J40Ju5T /�u4}
"c�c� /YtrnJG U$ �� tii+iv_r�'•�°
To 6`� 4•L_,E
!Au �/�t/�+r /Ly �Ro�.aTfr
•c_,, -;; r'r�r
r�C U • �A V 117' Ai1.1 v c.:=T'
�r'� T7�,CrL�i"�'.'`/V � 5
� I n� �, r � ;- r
A /TD U L Z' fi0 (y)
l '4) tT ILL . ._ n P n l_S �1 r : V .
OE/I -rti, b'N . A (;I_ _ -('_ /a r _ T / r
Qo CO &)G ��`�
-t-o M�.�►�c,� Crr>ti4•tIw(
(�S.
`rr-t� (?oo�= F'rG� <S �•J- <�,:,��.
�= u ti "� ,a 1 ,4 -- (o r�
f
w r T7 -1 L 2 r s t S i }n/ D
4 -1 —T
? 1 tJ 0c:-- S
Ld r-1' »7 /'1-/v – OL seD J
r
4,1
i'T`j
fJ ti•t)/'( �.. f'l " +!
/t�t�L tC r1' /0A./ ra.l /7 6?,frre- y
I/rr1'LaL r1 "T -rC•n1 1'tI ,� f= '1•rrrty
C7711 1 s
�,
I C.. �. r.•
^
\ !� t.�,( 1•'''�.�
loo. A /�, „: 1.:1 f�
,
I 111 / r�'T l 1 1 )il