HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975-10-20_COUNCIL MEETINGJ '
r •
(Revised)
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 20, 1975
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of Budget Meetings of September 15, 17, 22, 24 and 29, 1975, and of October 6,
1975, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by
RECOGNITION OF MRS. DORIS PARKER
I. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Analysis
of Assessment by City Manager. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed,
action by Resolution Ordering Assessment. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Street Improvement No. BA -100 - East Frontage Road Highway 169 -212 from Link
Road to 364 feet North
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading requires offering of
Ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass Second Reading or if
Second Reading should be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Roushar Square - PRD -3 to R -1 Residential District - City of Edina for
Darrel A. Farr - Generally located East of County Road 18, North of
Edina West Condominiums and South of Fabri -Tek - Z -75 -7 (9/24/75)
B. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 811 -A67 - Heritage Preservation Ordinance
2. Ordinance No. 802 -A2 - Establishing Heritage Preservation Board
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action
by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Londonderry Replat - Generally located North of Fabri -Tek and East of Lincoln
Drive S -75 -17 (9/24/75)
IV.. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Police Cars
B. 3/4 Ton Van
V. COMMUNICATIONS
Tabulation of Rids by Manaa_ar. Arrion of Council by Motion.
(Continued from 10/6/75)
(Continued from 10/6/75)
A. Robert E. Hanson - Crosstown Highway Frontage Road between Gleason Road
and Vernon Avenue
B. Petitions
1. Neal F. Page - Benton Ave. Access to T.H. 100
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
B. Greg Gustafson Registered Land Survey
C. County Road 18 Houses
D. Purchase of Madsen Property (N.W. corner of Dewey Hill Road and Cahill Road)
E. Grimes House
F. Retirement of Police Chief - November 15, 1975
G. Police Salary Negotiations
H. Human Relations Commission (Continued from 10/6/75)
I. Hennepin County Redistricting Meeting - 10/22/75
J. Traffic Safety Committee Meeting Minutes of 10/14/75
K. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Date
L. Revenue Sharing (Continued from 10/6/75)
M. Edina Sun Publication Deadline (Continued from 10/6/75)
N. H.R.A. Request for Liquor Store Location Decision
0. Morningside Improvements
'October 20, 1975 Agenda
Page Two
VII. RESOLUTIONS 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Minnesota Highway Department Stock Pile Removal
B. Suburban Public Health Nursing Service Participation
C. Valley View Road Street Vacation
VIII. ANY OTHERS WHO DESIRE HEARING BEFORE COUNCIL
IX. FINANCE
A. Liquor Fund as of 7/31/75
B. Transfer to H.R.A.
C. Purchase of Piano for Senior .Citizens
D. Claims Paid. Motion of , seconded by , for pay-
ment of the following claims as per Pre -Lisa dated October 20, 1975:
General and Revenue Sharing, $60,990.67; Construction, $279_,953.62; Park
Funds, $25,831.24; Water Fund, $7,589.54; Liquor Fund,.$186,281.23; Sewer
Fund, $55,289.10; Improvements, $830.84; Total $616,766.24
A' C-'r'7
Form MHD 2523 (6 -74)
R E S O L U T I O N
S.P. 2733 -68 (100 =130)
Fed.Proj. State Funds
At a (regular)(special) meeting of the City Councii of the City of Edina ,
duly held on the 20th day of October , 19 75 , the following Resolution was offered by
Courtney , Councilman ; seconded by Shaw ,
Councilman ; to wit:
I
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Highways for the State of Minnesota has caused to be prepared:
plans, special provisions and specifications for the improvement of Trunk Highway No. 130 ,
i
renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 100 , within the corporate limits of the City of Edina
fmnmoobe Located on T.H. 100 at 0.2 Mile South of the Jet. of
W 70th Street and at N E Ramp of C.S.A.H. #62
and,
WHEREAS, said plans are on file in the Office of the Department of Highways, St. Paul, Minne-
sota; being marked, labeled and identified as: S.P. 2733 -68 (100 =130)
; and,
WHEREAS, said special provisions are on file in the Office of the Department of Highways, St.
Paul, Minnesota; being marked, labeled and identified as: S.P. 2733 -68 (100 =130)
i
, and
which, together with, the Minnesota Department of Highways Standard Specifications for Highway
Construction, dated January 1, 1972, as amended by Minnesota Department of Highways Supple-
mental Specifications for Highway Construction, dated January 1, 1974, will govern, and which
are on file in the office of the Commissioner of Highways, constitute the specifications for
said improvement of Trunk Highway No. 130 , renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 100 ; and,
WHEREAS, copies of said plans and special provisions as so marked, labeled and identified are
i
also on file in the Office of the City Clerk; and,
i
I
WHEREAS, the term, said plans and special provisions, as hereinafter used in the body of this
1i Resolution will be deemed and intended to mean, refer to and incorporate the plans and
I special provisions in the foregoing recitals particularly identified and described; and,
WHEREAS, the Commissioner of Highways desires in the interest of public safety that any and all
parking of vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate limits of the City of
Edina , on said Trunk Highway No. 130 , renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 100 ,
will be parallel with the curb adjacent to the highway and will be at least 20 feet from any
crosswalk.
Page 1 of 2 Pages.
r
4 �
•i
0
I
1
� 4
a � _
Form MHD 2523 (6 -74)
NOW, THEN, BE IT RESOLVED that said plans and special provisions for the improvement of
Trunk Highway No. 130 , renumbered as Trunk Highway No. 100 , within the corporate limits
of the City of Edina be and hereby are approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Edina
does hereby agree to require
the parking of all vehicles, if such parking is permitted within the corporate limits of said
City, on said Trunk Highway No. 130 , renumbered Trunk Highway No. 100 , will be parallel
with the curb adjacent to the highway, and at least 20 feet from any crosswalks on all public
streets intersecting said trunk highway.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the elevations and grades as shown in said plans and special
provisions are hereby approved and consent is hereby given to any and all changes in grade
occasioned by the construction of Trunk Highway No. 130 , renumbered Trunk Highway No.
100 , in accordance with said plans and special provisions.
i
Upon the call of the roll, the following members voted in favor of the
Resolution: Courtney, Richards, Schmidt, Shaw and Mayor Van Valkenburg
and, the following
voted against the adoption of the Resolution:
whereupon the mayor and /or the presiding officer declared the Resolution adopted.
Dated: October. 20 , 19 75 (signed) JAMES VAN VALKENBURG
Mayor
Attest (signed) FLORENCE B. HALLBERG
City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF Hennepin ) ss.
CITY OF Edina )
I do hereby certify that at a (regular) (special) meeting (of which due and legal notice was
given) of the City Council of the City of Edina , Minnesota, on the 20th
day of October , 19 75 ; at which a majority of the members of said
Council were present, the foregoing Resolution was adopted.
Given under my hand and seal this 91.r day of nctoh�e(rI , 19 75
City lerk
Page 2 of 2 Pages.
r
-- C_
BILL BROCK .. COMMITTEES,
FINANCE
TENNESSEE-
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
's nitea ,cif of es SMALL BUSINESS
WASHINGTON. D.C. 2010
September, 1975
Dear Revenue Sharing Recipient:
The fight to renew the State and Local Fiscal Assistance Act of 1972- -
Revenue Sharing - -is to begin this fall. To be quite frank, the chances
of passage without the addition of severe restrictions are no better
than 50 -50. This means that Revenue Sharing in name could become just
another categorical grant program in fact.
In short, only one thing is 100 percent certain. Without the support of
all the state and local governments and their organizations, it will be
very difficult to enact a meaningful Revenue Sharing bill.
There are two things that you can do to help in this struggle. The
first is to write your Congressman or Congresswoman today. Tell them
how important Revenue Sharing funds are to your area. Tell them how you
have seen Revenue Sharing funds used to benefit-
en entire communities.
Second, I would like to ask you to fill out the enclosed questionnaire.
While many different organizations have endorsed Revenue Sharing, I am
interested in the reactions of people like you to it.
How will these results be used? When hearings start on Revenue Sharing
in the House of Representatives later this month, I'll give a "preliminary
report" to the Committee. -When the Senate holds its hearings later in
the year, part of my testimony will include a "final report" on the
results of my questionnaire. I am confident that both the Senate and
the House will be tremendously interested in your reaction.
Just as the first struggle to get Revenue Sharing was long and difficult,
we will face an uphill battle to renew it. Hopefully, my Committee
positions will allow me to be helpful in this struggle. I am fortunate
enough to be on the appropriate Revenue Sharing Subcommittee in both the
Finance Committee and the Government Operations Committee. This should
make it easier for me to fight for a quick renewal of Revenue Sharing.
During the upcoming debate there will be many different approaches taken
to Revenue Sharing. Indeed, T have taken the liberty to describe my
bill on the next page. However, the important thing is to pass a meaningful
Revenue Sharing bill. Your assistance is deeply appreciated.
Very- ly yours,
L BROCK
The Brock Bill, S -11.
Last year, my staff and I tried to work closely with your
organizations to create a bill for the renewal of Revenue
Sharing. Through this consultation, I learned that state
and local officials wanted three items in the new bill:
One, a permanent program; two, an "inflation proof" program,
and three, less "red tape." The bill I introduced to renew
Revenue Sharing, S. 11, incorporates these changes.
1. Making the program permanent:
I have always supported Revenue,Sharing as a permanent
program, but, as a believer in pilot testing, I went
along with the five year program of the 1972 Act.
However, not only is that pilot testing period over, it
has proven to be an outstanding success. As some of you
and your organizations have testified before both the
Intergovernmental Relations Subcommittee and the Revenue
Sharing Subcommittee, Revenue Sharing has proven itself.
There is no reason why this program should not be
permanent. Incidentally, even the new budget bill has
a provision to make Revenue Sharing a permanent program
outside the regular appropriations=; ;process.
2. Making the program inflation proof:
Unfortunately, inflation has become a fact of life in
this country. Revenue Sharing must be adjusted each
year to reflect this fact. The Advisory Commission on
Intergovernmental Relations recommended that a percentage
of Federal adjusted gross income be used and I have
taken their suggestion. ACIR recommended using 0.68'
which would have given the program 7.5 billion dollars
this year rather than 6.35 billion dollars. S. 11 uses
a factor almost identical to this, 0.70.
3. Cutting red tape:
As everyone knows, the "priority areas" restriction
placed on local governments are really needless red
tape. These requirements merely create additional
bookkeeping.entries, and thus additional cost, without
any added benefit. Therefore, I have eliminated these
categories.
BROCK REVENUE SHARING QUESTIONNAIRE _
1. Do you support renewal of general Revenue Sharing?
Yes X No
2. Do you think the program .should be changed?
Yes No X
Comments
3. Does the program allow state and local officials to
use funds in most needed programs?
Yes X No
4. Is this program important to your government?
Yes X No
S. What priority would you assign to Revenue Sharing?
1st 2nd 3rd Other X
6. Would your government.have to raise taxes without
Revenue Sharing? e
Yes X No How Much $150,000
7. Would your government have to cut back on programs
without general Revenue Sharing?
Yes X No Which ones:
Certain Capital Type Improvements
Name CITY OF EDINA —
Address 4801, West 50th Street
City /State EDINA, MINNESOTA Zip 55424
Position or Title
J. N. DALEN, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
P.S. This questionnaire requires no postage. Just detach,
fold where indicated, and mail. Thanks again.
Mailed to Senator Bill Brock, 254 Russell Building, Washington, D. C. 20510
STATE OF MINNESOTA - BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155
IN THE MATTER OF:-%
tinnesota Teamsters Public and Law Enforcement Employees Union Local. No. 3209
ATinneapolis' Minnesota
-and=
City of Edina# Edina# Hinnesoto
Case No. 76-Pt4'507 -A
NOTICE OF MEDIATION MEETING
You are hereby advised that the Director of the Bureau of Mediation Services,
State of Minnesota, is in receipt of a petition for mediation in a labor dispute
involving the.above -named parties.
In compliance with the provisions of the Public Employment labor Relations
Act of 1971 as amended, you are hereby notified that I, as Director of the. Bureau
of Mediation Services, State of Minnesota,'fix the following time and place at
which a conference will be held for the purpose of effecting a settlement of the
dispute:
DAY: Thursday
DATE: October 239 1975
TIME: 10 :00 a.mf
PLACE: Hyatt Lodge, 41 north 10th. Streets Minneapolis, Minnesota
.It shall be the duty of all parties and /or their authorized and designated
representatives, to be present at the session so that every effort can be made to
arrive at an amicable settlement of the controversy.
The representatives should be cloaked with the authority to negotiate, be
prepared to identify the unresolved issues and their positions on them, and be
prepared with copies of all relevant material for the mediator.
ces Lawrence M. Bastian
Warren iiyde
Don Eiger
Cy Smythe
,City Council .
City Attorney
CityClerk
Dated at St. Paul, Minnesota
dd
Form BMS -78
(Rev. 1 -75)'
(PUBLIC)
Very truly yours,
DIRECTCR
BUREAU OF MEDIATION SERVICES
STATE OF MINNESOTA
•�IN�y'� j u
For the Director
October 7= 1975
MEETING NOTICE
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONER REDISTRICTING
Legal Action Steering Committee
Golden Valley City Hall
7800 Golden Valley Road
8:00 P.M.
Wednesday, October 22, 1975
Redistricting of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners
was completed last July notwithstanding many objections
voiced in public hearings. Legal counsel has been obtained
and determination made to request court intervention to set
Aside the plan adopted, thus forcing the issue back to the
Minnesota State Legislature.
On .October 22, 1975, we shall discuss the legal grounds for
setting aside the County Board plan and the appropriate means
of implementing this action in court.. Your advice, counsel,
and support is needed for success in this important matter
affecting our largest local unit of government.
Edward J. Erickson, Mayor, City of New Hope:
Loren L. Law, Mayor, City of Richfield
Duane R. Miedtke, Mayor, City of St. Anthony
F 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT. OF HIGHWAYS
DISTRICT NO. O
2098 NO. LILAC DRIVE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINN.
September 26, 1975
Mr. Robert C. Dunn, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
In reply refer to: 315
S.P. 2733 -68 (T.H. 10,0 =130)
0.2 Mi. So. of 70th Street and at
N.E. Ramp Jct. T.H. 100 and CSAH 62
Stockpile Removal and Noise Mound
Plan Approval
Dear Bob:
Attached is a copy of the plans, the proposal, a resolution form for the
above referenced project.
The work consists of lowering the stockpile inplace southerly of West
70th Street and moving a part of the stockpile to construct the noise mound
outside the future N.E. ramp of the T.H. 100 and CSAH 62 intersection. The
noise mounding is consistent with the noise layout (S.P. 2733 -25 Layout 17A)
transmitted to you December 24, 1974.
Please review the documents and present them to the City Council so as to
receive a resolution of approval for the project. The project is proposed
for the October 24, 1975 letting and, therefore, the executed resolution
should be returned to this office prior to October 17, 1975.
Sincerely,
W. M. Crawford
District Engineer
1—
By: JKJ. Anderson
District Engineering Coordinator
S
MHD 2520 (Rev. 10 -73)
R E C E I P T
I have received from W. M. Crawford
District Engineer, Minnesota Highway Department, and have filed the Following
described documents:
Construction plans, special provisions and resolution forms for S.P. 2733_68
(100 =130) for a stockpile removal.
City Clerk Edina
Date �--P a /' / 9 7
(D tc
RFC,01 IITTON
WHEREAS, Layout 23B, dated October 4, 1972 as revised October 7, 1975
for CSAH 18 Project No. 6742 showing the proposed alignment for the con-
struction of County State Aid Highway No. 18 within the limits of the City
of Edina as a Federal Aid Project has been prepared and presented to the
City of Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that said Layout 23B
be in all things approved and the County is hereby authorized to acquire the
necessary rights -of -way on the basis of the said Layout and as hereinafter
provided:
The County shall construct the noise attenuation wall as proposed in the
Layout and shall give each owner of the properties adjacent to said CSAH 18�"''
within the limits of the City of Edina between Maloney Avenue and
the option of selling his or her property to the County at a price w is
based upon independent fee appraisals. The County shall also provide reloca-
tion assistance and benefits to all eligible parties in accordance with State
and Federal Regulations. Properties so acquired shall be rented during the
time of construction and shall then be offered for sale following completion
of the project. Right of direct access to CSAH 18 shall be acquired from
those owners who decide not to sell their entire property to the County.
ADOPTED this day of 19
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its meeting of 19 , and as
recorded in the Minutes of said meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 19
City Clerk
3
V
MEMORANDUM
October 20, 1975
MEMO TO: Council
FROM: Marcia Mohr
Recreation Supervisor
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Revised Bid on Piano for Sr. Citizens Building
After receiving the original bids listed on the memo to Council dated
October 15, 1975, Mr. Loberg, Manager of Schmidt Music Stores downtown
office, offered the City of Edina's Sr. Citizens Club the Everett II
piano at cTst. The total of the Everett 11 would be $1,075.00.
Although I feel that the Yamaha is a superior piano, the savings is well
worth the lesser quality between the two pianos.
Therefore, at this time, we recommend the award to Schmidt Music Stores,
Mr. Loberg, for the Everett II piano at $1,075.00.
October 15, 1975
MEMO TO: Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, Director
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Piano Purchase for Sr. Citizens Building
We have received two bids on a purchase of a piano for the Sr. Citizens
of Edina. This item is needed for various activities of the Edina Sr.
Citizens Club. In the past, they have attempted to use donated pianos
and secondhand pianos; however, they have been prone to break down and
are very expensive to repair and tune. The two bids are as.follows:
I. Bodines (Yamaha Studio Upright P 202) - $1,429.00. This price includes
the regulation and tuning service. (Only supplier in the Twin City
Area)
2. Schmidt Music Store (Everett II) - $1,375.00 however, with the needed
regulation and tuning service the total would.be $1,455.00. This is
a comparative piano with the Yamaha.
We are, at this time, requesting Council to authorize the purchase_ of this
piano of which $800.00 will be withdrawn from the City of Edina's Sr.
Citizen liability acccunt. This is money that has been received from the
rental of the community room from various organizations. The remaining
$629.00 is available from private funds.
After making comparative studies and considerable time researching the
pianos, Ms. Mohr feels that the Yamaha i.s.a superior piano and best suited.
for the uses by the Edina Sr. Citizens.Club. Recommend award of the piano
to Bodines for the Yamaha Studio Upright P 202 at $1,429.00.
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Due from Other Funds
Loan To Other Funds
Accrued Interest
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Mix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies Inventory
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
JULY •31, 1975
ASSETS
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
FIXED ASSETS AT COST:
Land
Land Improvements $ 21,644.06
Buildings 455,911.08
Furniture and Fixtures 146,842.09
Leasehold Improvements 3,035.55
$627,432.78
Less: Allowance for Depreciation and
$471,632.12
3,500.00 $ 475,132.12
18,775.00
415,000.00
10,955.00
$535,931.01
178,708.16
(5,057.47) 709,581.70
$ 2,020.30
400.00 2,420.30
$1,631,864.12
$151,448.85
Amortization 175,388.40 452,044.38
$603,493.23
Construction in Progress 3,482.92 606,976.15
TOTAL 'ASSETS $2,238,840.27
LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Payroll
SURPLUS:
Invested in Fixed Assets
Unappropriated
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
$ 200,685.38
3,542.61
$ 204,227.99
$ 606,976.15
1,427,636.13 2,034,612.28
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS $2,238,840.27
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
COMPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
.,CITY -OF EDINA_
Seven Months Ending July 31, 1975 and July 31; 1974
c:
1975 19'74 INCREASE- DECREASE*
50th St. Yorkdole,. Grandview Total 50th St. SouAdale Grandview Total 50th St Yorkdale Grandview Total
Liquor $426,349 66 $ 634 208. 32 $443,564 40 $1,504,122.38 $418,589.00 $557,141.00 $389,896.00 $1,365,626.00.$ 7,760.66:$ 77,067.32 $ 53,668.40 $138,496. <38
Wine 1179225.96 198,951.19 118,196.80 434,313.95 111,267.00 171,576.00 93,180.00 376,023.00 5,958.96 21,375.19 25,016.80 58,350.95
Beer 166,839.11 226,501.19 131,169.80 524,510.10 145,257.00 18 6,09,7.00 .108,794.00 440,148.00 211582.11 40,404.19 22,375.80 84,362.10
Mix and Miscellaneous 15 273.59 22 086.53 16,057.65 53 417 77 14 395.00 17 447. 00. 13 661.00 45 503.00 878.59 4,639.53 2 396 65 7,914.77
$725,688.32 $1,081,747.23 $708,988.65 $2,516,424.20 $689,508.00 $932,261..00 $605,531.00 $2_9227,300.00 $36,180.32 $149,486.23 $103,457.65 $289,124..20
Less bottle refunds 12,724.90 17,094.12 . 11,907.28 41•,726.30 11,265.00 14,267.00 10,971.00 36,503.00 1 459.90 2,827.12 936.28 5,223.30'
NET SALES $712,963.42 $1,064,653.11 $697,081.37 $29474;697.90 $678,243.00.$917d 94.00 $594,560.00 $22190,797.00 $34, 720.42 $146,659.11 $102,521937 $283,900.90
COST OF SALES:'
.Inventory - January 1$191,471.96 $ 210,403..16 $218,397.83 $ 620,272.95 $183,,230.00 $202,960.00.$165,390.00 $ 551,580.00 $ 8,241.96 $ 7,443.16 $ 53,007.83 $ 68,692.95.
Purchases 615,834.30 914,259.84 610,791.22 2,140,885.36 597,410.00 774,999.00 528,337.00 1,9009746 00 18,424.30 139,260 84 82,454 22 240,139 36
$807,306.26 $1,124,663.00 $829,189.05 $2,761,158.31 $780,640.00 $977,959.00 $693,727.00 $2,452,326.00 $26,666.26 $146,704.00 $135,462.05 $308,832.31
Inventory-July 31 208,058.56 250,861.69 250,661.45 709,581.70 219,885.00 236,400.00 197,194.00 653,479.00 11;826.44* 14,461.69 53,467 45 56,102 70
$599,247.70 $ 873,801.31 $578,527.60 $2,051,576.61 $560,755.00 $741,559.00 $496,533.00 $1,798,847.00 $38,492.70 $132,242.31 $ 81,994 60 $252,729.61
GROSS PROFI $113,715.72 $ 190,851.80 $118,553,77 $ 423,121.29 $117,488.00,$176,435.00 $'98,027.00 $ 391,950.00 $ 3,772.28*$ 14,416.80 $ 20,526.77 $ 31,171 29
0 Selling EXPENSES: 39,295.96 $ 38,.074.40 $ 31,583.65 $ 108,954.01 $ 36,795.00 $ 33,321.00 $ 26,060.00 $ 96,176.00 $ 2,500.96 $ 4,753.40 $ 5,523.65 $ 12,778:01
Overhead 8,558.07 16,315.57 12,734.62 37,608.26 12,215.00 13,755.00. 12,3519.00 38,329.00 3,656.93 2,560.57 375.62 720.74* `
Administrative. - 24,054.96 25,981.05 22,473.03 72,509.04 16,698.00 16,858.00. 14,715.00 48,271.00 7,356 96 9,123 05 7,758 03 24,238 04
TOTAL OPERATING$ 71,908.99 $ 80,371.02 $ 66,791.30 $ 219,071.31 $ 65,708.00 $ 63,708.00 $ 53,134.00 $. 182,776.00 $ 6,200.99 $ 16,437.02 $ 13,657.30 $ 36,295.31
EXPENSES
NET OPERATIN
PROFIT $ 41,806.73 $ 110,480.78 $ 51,762.47 $ 204,049.98 $ 51,780.00 $112,501.00_$ 44,893.00 $ 209,174.00 $ 9,973.27*$ 2,020.22*$ 6,869.47 $ 5,124.02*
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discount $ 2,601.12 $ 4,248.48 $ 3,453.47 $ 10,303.07 $ 3,066.00 $ .4,097.00 $ 2,869.00 $ 10,032.00 $ .464.88*$ 151.48 $ 584.47 $ 271.07
Cash over or under 15.04* 52.90* 112.05 44.11 55.00 9:00* 122.00 168.00 70.04* 43.90* 9.95* 123.89*
Income on investments 10, 955.00 10 , 955.00 3 , 818.00
Other 3,818.00 7 ,137.00 7,137.00
755.77 246.60 148.50 1,150.87 925.00 925.00 169.23* 246.60 148'.50 - 225.87
NET INCOME$ 14,296.85 $ 4,442.18 $ 3,714.02 $ 22,453.05 $ 7,864.00 $ 4,088.00 $ 2 991.00 $ 14,943.00 $ 6,432.85 $ 354.18 $ 723.02 $ 7,510.05
$ 56,103.5.8 $ 114,922.96 $ 55,476.49 $ 226,503.03 $ 59,644.00 $116,589.00 11 47,884.00 $ 224,117 00 $ 3;540 42*$ 1,666 04 $ 7,592 49 $ 2,386 03
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross profit 15.95% 17.93% 17.01% 17.10% 17.327. 19.22% 16.49% 17.89%
. Operating expenses 10.09 7.55 9.58 8.85 9.69 6.96 8.94 8.34
Operating .profit 5.86% 10.38 %. 7.43% 8.25% 7.63% 12.26% 7.55% 9.55%
' Other income
NET INCOME 2,01 .41 .53 .90 1.16 .44 .50 .68
7.87% 10.79% 7.96% 9.15% 8.79% 12.70% 8.05% 10.23%
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN THE
SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY NURSING DISTRICT
Mr. Courtney introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 145.08 and
145.12, provision has been made for a public health nursing
district in that portion of Hennepin County outside the City
of Minneapolis, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to such authority such a public health
nursing district has been organized and has been in operation
since 1952, and
WHEREAS, it is deemed necessary to continue the operation of
such nursing district and to provide it with adequate funds
for its proper operation
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF
the Edina City Council _ that this political subdivision
continue to be included in the public health nursing district
of Suburban Hennepin County, organized on January 4, 1952;
that it participate in the benefits thereof; and that it
agrees to support on an apportionment basis its pro rata
share of the cost of the administration of such district
provided, however, that for the period of January 1, 19'10
through December 31, 1976 this cost shall not exceed 500
per capita on the basis of 1975 population estimates as per
the Metropolitan Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall be deemed
an agreement to continue to participate in such nursing
district on the basis hereinbefore specified with all other
political subdivisions adopting similar resolutions.
The motion for adoption of the following resolution was
seconded by Councilman thaw Upon roll call there were
ffour yeas and one nays:
Yeas Nays
Courtney, Richards, Shaw, Van ValkenburC Schmidt
I, Flo enre 1- H;;11hPr; , Clerk of the city of F.jina
hereby certify that the above is a true copy of a resolution
adopted by the governing body of Edina in an
official meeting on Or 20. 1975 �..�.•
(signed
(Clerk)
.j
subutban Tublic Health T utsing cS -mce
IN HENNEPIN COUNTY
West 201 Telephone: 925 -3960
8700 W. 36th Street
St. Louis Perk, Minn. 55426 i
Telephone: 933 2445
August 26, 1975
Member Municipalities of the Nursing District:
Enclosed is the 1976 budget of the Suburban Public Health Nursing
Service. In establishing this budget, the Nursing Committee has
attempted to reflect what we hope is the majority opinion of the
various municipal officials who met with us on August 14th at
the Minnetonka City Hall. You will remember that we were advised
on that date to fund a potential deficit of $ 113,000 by:
a) cutting services back to "the basics"
b) levying no more than an additional 2¢ per capita
c) levying as much of a per capita increase as neces-
sary to fund the 1976 operation
The budget enclosed is based, unfortunately, on a per capita
increase greater than the 2¢ bottom line suggestion but,.
fortunately, much less than that needed to fund the entire
deficit and sustain the same level of operation.
The Nursing Committee has approved the following reductions
in staff for 1976 operations:
a) three (3) full time nurse positions
b) one (1) part time technician
The economy to be realized by these reductions is S$45,100. In
order to provide for these reductions in staff, we have planned
for the discontinuance in 1976 of well child clinics and school
health services. The Nursing Committee is of the opinion that
any further curtailments in staffing and services would severely
impair our ability to meet health needs of the people of our
communities and would raise serious question as to the wisdom of
continueing the Suburban Public Health Nursing Service beyond
December 31, 1975•
SUPPORTED BY TAX FUNDS FROM MUNICIPALITIES OF � SUBURBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY AND THE UNITED FUND
The 1976 budget, as approved by the Nursing.Commi,t;tee . on
August 21, 1975, provides for expenditures in the ;amount
of $464,719 -- a figure which will balance with anticipated
revenues on2a if, a proposed per capita increase of eleven
cents (11¢) can be sustained by the member municipalities
with calculations based on the 1975 est.mated census. In
addition, we.are requesting an additional q122,000 of the
United Way and balancing the 1976 budget presumes that
this request will be honored. -
Also enclosed is a resolution form relating to continued
participation of your municipality in the'Nursing District.
Tile urge,ntly.:.request -that you forward formal notice of your
C.ouncil41,s action on .this, or a similar form, no later than
`Nov;emb._er .1., 19:75.
Thank you for your .,interest 'and 'assistance in deli - bera't'ing
these critical .i-ssues in .the •continuation -o,f 'the 'Suburban
Public Health Nursing Service.
Sincerely,
Robert.Johaston,-Chairman
0. J. Bronstad, Vice - chairman
Ern.ee McArthur, Secretary
Keith Meland, Treasurer
Virginia Anderson
.Robert Doan, M.D.
Sam Hi'guchi
Victoria Joyner
Nursing Committee
-2-
The 1976 budget, as approved by the Nursing.Commi,t;tee . on
August 21, 1975, provides for expenditures in the ;amount
of $464,719 -- a figure which will balance with anticipated
revenues on2a if, a proposed per capita increase of eleven
cents (11¢) can be sustained by the member municipalities
with calculations based on the 1975 est.mated census. In
addition, we.are requesting an additional q122,000 of the
United Way and balancing the 1976 budget presumes that
this request will be honored. -
Also enclosed is a resolution form relating to continued
participation of your municipality in the'Nursing District.
Tile urge,ntly.:.request -that you forward formal notice of your
C.ouncil41,s action on .this, or a similar form, no later than
`Nov;emb._er .1., 19:75.
Thank you for your .,interest 'and 'assistance in deli - bera't'ing
these critical .i-ssues in .the •continuation -o,f 'the 'Suburban
Public Health Nursing Service.
Sincerely,
Robert.Johaston,-Chairman
0. J. Bronstad, Vice - chairman
Ern.ee McArthur, Secretary
Keith Meland, Treasurer
Virginia Anderson
.Robert Doan, M.D.
Sam Hi'guchi
Victoria Joyner
Nursing Committee
0
SUBURBAN PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE
1976 BUDGET
DISTRIBUTION OF. PROGRAM COSTS
ACCOUNT
ANNUAL
SUPPORTING SERVICES
Yx�c�x�!►n �xyi���
TOTAL
MGMNT.
FUND
TOTAL
MAT -. -
CHILD
ILL cec DISABLED
HOME
DESCRIPTION
AGENCY
SUP -PORT
_
AND
RAIS -.
PROG.
ADULT
HEALTH
IMMUN.
-TEACH.-
1!5 '.
BUDGET
SERVICE
GENERAL
ING
SERV.
HEALTH
COUIVSEL
CARE
AIDE
CLINIC
EXPE.,MLTURE;
Salaries
325488
65140
64158
982
260248
36 59
73,373
118392
29 56
2268
Employee Benefits
34,694
6;-95
6,1.01 .
94
28,499
__2p87
7P51
13401
2832
328
Payroll Taxes
16,339
2955
2P14_
41
1384
2081
4203
3217
l 23
160
Prof. Fees
6,250
3,800
3,800
2,450
2,450
Supplies
430
424
6
4fi45
303
573
1711
204
1854
Telephone
2,950
529
521
.8
2,421
373
704
1p58
250
36
Postage
1,200
60o
600
600
600
Occupancy
Rent & Gen. Ins.
21,459
3 .853
3,795
58
17597
2711
5,120
7686
1820
260
Mileage
21,800
700
665
35
21.100
2,796
5 .659„
9;L
3.300
214
Conferences,
Conventions
800
161
159
2
639
101
215
323
Subscriptions tic
1,450
260
256
4
1190
183
346
5z0
123
18
References
E uinment & Repairs
2.125
2125
2.125
7 7 1 scellaneo.us
-
250
250
200
Contingencies
24848
5014
4240
74
19834
2710
5485
144
228
208
TOTAL EXPENLITURES:
464719
Z'6.2
90 8
I o4
3729
1 04
10.62
16
42
6
SUBURBAN PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE
1976 BUDGET
DISTRIBUTION OF PROGRAM COSTS BY SOURCE OF SUPPORT
ACCOUNT
DESCRIPTION
GENCY
UDGET
SUPPORTING SERVICES
PROGRAM SERVICES
TOTAL
:SUPPORT
SERVICE
MGP -INT.
AND
GENERAL
FUND
RAIS-
ING
TOTAL
PROG.
SERV.
MAT. -
CHILD
ADULT
HEALTH
ILL & DISABLED
HOME
HEALTH
AIDE
1111MUN.
CLINIC
TEACH.
COUNSEL
NSG.
CARE
`762
TOTAL
EXPENDITURESs
r, 191-9;762 9 99,458 x,304 37�957
5�,50�
1.o�629
168833
4 095
,896
'
12,672
25,501
44788
10,360
1,441
Allocation of Supporting Service Costs
TOTAL
PROGRAM COSTS
..
;64,176
29;130
211,621
52,455
7'.337
138
31,472
157,378
2,;w66
L716
Less:
UNITED.AWAY IND FEE SERVICE INCOME
2
TOTAL
MUNICIPALITY COSTS
64038
97,658
54243
23,J89
%621
_
PROGRAMS BY COST AND SOURCES OF REVENUE
SUPPORTING SERVICES
PROGRAM SERVICES
TOTAL
MAT.-
ILL &.DISABLED
HOME,
MGMT. & FUND
EXPEND.
TEACH.
NSG.
GENERAL RAISING
CHILD
ADULT
HEALTH
IMMUN.'
HEALTH
COUNSEL.CARE
AIDE
CLINIC
TOTAL EXPENDITURES:
9.0;58
x,394
5?504
lo3629
169,833
42095
5, 96
4E4719
MINUS FEE SERVICE
& UNITED WAY INCOME
62,561
- - - --
- - - --
22416
112765
20,806
1,222
.219770
11-39%
.53%
2 1. 0 351
33.16
23.30r
. 8.69%
1.90 %
1000%
COST TO MUNICIPALITIES
27,897
1,304
51504
81,213
57AE8
21,289
40574
244,949
1975. EST. PC::ULATION
5.0570
.0027
.1052
.1658
.1165
.0434
.0094
$-5.0
PER CAPITA COST
SCHEDULE OF REVENUE
.:MUNICIPALITIES
..244,949..
UNITED 'WAY
76,370.
FEE SERVICES:
CANCER SOCIETY
4,000.
CHEST CLINIC
3,900.
MEDICARE
55,000.
.PATIENTS
-20,500.
VETERANS ADMIN.
25,000.
WELFARE
3 2., ,00.0 .
IMMUN.. CLINIC
1..700.
142,,100.
INTEREST INCOME
1,000.
OTHER INCOME
300.
464,719.
EXHIBIT A
That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township 116,
Range 21 described as follows:
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4;
thence West to the Southwest corner of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast
1/4; thence Northerly along the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 to the Northeast corner of Lot 8, Block 3, Kemrich Knolls;
thence Easterly along the Easterly extension of the North line of said Lot 8,
a distance of 35 feet; thence Northerly, 35 feet East of and parallel with
the West line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 to an intersection
with a circular arc with a radius of 50 feet and with a center point located
on the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 1, Block 2, Kemrich Knolls
distant 25 feet East of the Northeast corner of said Lot 1 as platted in the
original Kemrich Knolls plat; thence Northeasterly, Northerly and Northwesterly
along said circular arc to an.intersection with the West line of said
Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Northerly along said West line of
the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4.-a distance of 150 feet; thence Easterly,
at right angles to said West line of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 6/4,
a distance of 82 feet; thence Southeasterly, at a deflection angle of 45 00'
degrees to the right, to an intersection with a line running Southwesterly
from the Southeast corner of Outlo- As, Diacina, Oanz al. a,, aivjir Ulf 73 1G'02"
as turned counterclockwise from the Southwest corner of said Outlot A; thence
Northeasterly, along said line running Southwesterly from the Southeast
corner of Outlot A, to an intersection with a line 818 feet North of and
parallel with the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4;
thence East along said line 8 8 feet North of and parallel with the South line
of said Southwest 1/4 of the grtheast 1/4 to a point 331.95 feet West of the
East line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Southerly, 331.95
feet West of and parallel to the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 to a point 554.9 feet South of the.North line of said Southwest 1/4
of the Northeast 1/4; thence Easterly, 554.9 feet South of and parallel with the
North line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 to the East line of said
Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence Southerly to the point of beginning.
The following tracts of land are excepted from the above description:
1. The North 401.5 feet of the South 418 feet of the West 209 feet of the
East 905 feet of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4.
2. A tract of land lying within the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 8, Township 116, Range 21 and described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of the North four hundred one and five
tenths feet (401.5') of the South four hundred eighteen feet (418') of
R",
EXHIBIT A, page 2
the West two hundred nine feet (209') of the East nine hundred five feet
(905') of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8, Township
116, Range 21; thence East parallel to the South line of said Southwest
1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of.two hundred nine feet (209');
thence South parallel to the East line of said Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 a distance of one hundred thirty -four and fifty hundredths
feet (134.50'); thence East parallel to the South line of said Southwest
1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 to a point three hundred thirty -one and ninety -
five hundredths feet (331.95') West of the East line of said Southwest
1/4 of the Northeast 1/4; thence North parallel to and three hundred
thirty -one and ninety -five hundredths feet (331.95') West of the East
line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of five
hundred thirty -four and five - tenths feet (534.5'); thence West and parallel
to the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance
of four hundred seventy -nine feet (479.0'); thence Southwesterly to point
of beginning.
3. The South 16.5 feet of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4.
4. The East 33 feet of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4.
EXHIBIT B
That part of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8,
Township 116, Range 21 and described as follows:
Beginning at the Southwest cornet of Lot 1, Block 1, Braemar Oaks; thence
Southwesterly at an angle of 106 49'58" as turned clockwise from the
Southeast corner of said Lot 1 to an intersection with a line 818 feet
Northerly of and parallel with the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4; thence West a distance of 62.69 feet; thence
Northeasterly to the Southeast corner of Outlot A, Braemar Oaks; thence
Easterly to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT C
The West 358.95 feet of the East 391.95 feet of the South 60 feet of the
North 614.9 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 8,
Township 116, Range 21. Also the West 60 feet of the East 391.95 feet
of said Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 lying between a line 818 feet
Northerly of and parallel with the South line of said Southwest 1/4 of the
Northeast 1/4 and a line 554.9 feet Southerly of and parallel with the
North line of said Southwest 1/4 of.the Northeast 1/4.
Said temporary easement shall terminate 6 months after access to
properties lying North and Westerly has been made available from the
West. All permanent structures on said easement shall be removed at the
expense of the Party of the Second Part or Assigns no later than 6 months
after written.request to do so has been issued by the City. Returning
area as much as possible to its original condition.
AGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 6, 1975
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of September 8 and 15, 1975, approved as presented or corrected by motion of
seconded by
I. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Tabula-
tion of Assessment. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed, action by
Resolution Ordering Assessment. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Street Improvement No. E -29 - Creek Valley Road Cul -De -Sac (Continued
from 9/15/75)
B. Street Lighting Improvement No. L -9 - W. 70th Street from T.H. 100 to
France Ave.
C• 1975 Oiling - W. 59th St. between Oaklawn and Wooddale Avenues
D. Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -291 - W. Frontage Road Highway 100 from
W. 44th St. to 615 feet North
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON FLOOD PLAIN PERMIT Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presenta-
tion by Planning Department. Spectators heard. If Council wishes to proceed,
action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass.
A. Lot 1, Block 2, Sioux Trail 3rd Addition (6836 Sally Lane)
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING MATTERS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Planning Department. Spectators heard. First Reading requires offering of
ordinance only. 4/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if Second Reading should
be waived.
A. First Reading
1. Ordinance No. 811 -A67 - Heritage Preservation Ordinance
2. Ordinance No. 802 -A2 - Establishing Heritage Preservation Board
IV. AWARD OF BIDS Tabulations and recommendations by Acting City Manager. Action
of Council by Motion.
A. Police Cars
B. 3/4 Ton Van
V. COMMUNICATIONS
A. Marvin L. Ellingson, Jr. - Street Surfacing - Xerxes Ave.
B. Ralph Campbell III - Naming of Park
C. Revenue Sharing
D. Robert P. Boblett - Blake Road Traffic
E. Petitions
1. Dovre Drive between Parkwood Lane and Biscayne Blvd. - One Way Street
2. France Ave. between W. 66th St. & W. 69th St. - Underground Wiring
3. Glasgow Drive - Permanent Street Surfacing & Curb
4. Edina Green Improvements (Sanitary Sewer, Watermain, Graveling,
Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb, Storm Sewer)
1;ctober 6, 1975 Agenda
Page Two
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Planning Commission
1. Final Plat Approval
a. Nine Mile North 2nd Addition
2. Lot Divisions
a. Outlots B and C, Gleason Fifth Addition, and Lot 3, Block 1,
Gleason Fifth Addition (Generally located South of Vernon Ave.
and West of Gleason Road - LD -75 -5 (.7/2/75, 7/30/75, 9/3/75)
b. Part of Lot 9, Warden Acres (5709 Warden Ave.)
3. Set Hearing Date
a. Londonderry Replat - Generally located North of Fabri -Tek and East
of Lincoln Drive S -75 -17 (9/24/75)
B. Purchase of Grimes House (Continued from 9/15/75)
C. Suit - Gordon C. Cravens
D. Kyllo Assessment Refund
E. Authorize Lighting Improvement No. P -L -12 - 100% Petition
F. Edina Sun-- Publication Deadline
G. 1976 Budget
VII. RESOLUTIONS
A. Minnesota Highway Department Stockpile Removal
VIII. ANY OTHERS M,0' D'S.I .T.'., ::FARING L1L1' V^ COUNCIL
IX. FINANCE
A. Purchase of Air Compressor
B. Claims Paid. Motion of seconded by for
payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated October 6, 1975:
General and Revenue Sharing, $99,841.12; Construction Fund, $698.35;
Park Funds, $30,912.84; Water Funds, $14,175.99; Liquor Fund, $3,648.39;
Sewer Fund, $2.703.58; Improvements, $364,245.00; Total, $516,225.27;
and for confirmation of payment of the following Claims: General and
Revenue Sharing, $150,861.48; Construction Fund, $25.00; Park Funds,
4,297.96; Water Fund, $1,065.25; Liquor Fund, $171,334.68; Total,
$327,584.37
C. Purchase of Wire - Braemar Lighting System
D. Purchase of Heaters - Braemar Club House
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN.1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.24 (452 .days)
ANALYSIS
OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6213
FOR: STREET LIGHTS NO. L -9
LOCATION: West 70th Street from Highway
100 to France Avenue
CONTRACTOR: Northern States Power
CONTRACT.AMOUNT:
$6,900.00
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (107.)
690.00.
$7,590.00
Work. Order #568 - Sodding and Black
Dirt
181.39
$7,771.39
Less State Aid Share
3,795.00
$3,976.39
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES:
15.00
$3,991.39
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
From: January 20, 1975
To: October 6, 1975
259 days @ $0.55 per day
142.85 .
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$4,134.24
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 88
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT
- $50.00 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
- $46.98 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST:
$4,134.24
COUNTY CHARGE: 76 Parcels @ $0.50
each parcel
38.00
$4,172.24
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru 1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN.1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.24 (452 .days)
w
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6224
FOR: STREET OILING
LOCATION: West 59th Street between Oaklawn and Wooddale
CONSTRUCTION: City of Edina . `
$117.02
Labor 123.00
Equipment 540.18
Material $780.20
CLERICAL AND OVERHEAD 105.56
-"-' --
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $885.76
ASSESSABLE UNITS: 1,067.20 feet
Cost per foot - 83C
Interest - 5%
ASSESSABLE COST: $885.76
COUNTY CHARGE: 8 Parcels @ $0.05 each parcel .40
$886.16
PAYABLE IN ONE YEAR WITH TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT
LEVY NO. 6214
FOR: SANITARY SEWER NO. 291
LOCATION: West Frontage Road Highway 100 from West 44th Street
to 615 feet north
CONTRACTOR: State of Minnesota Highway Department
CONTRACT AMOUNT: $11,035.50
ENGINEERING AND CLERICAL: (12,') 1,324.26
$12,359.76
PUBLISHING AND SUPPLIES: 35.00
$12,394.76
CAPITALIZED INTEREST @ 5%
One Year 619.71
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,014.47
ASSESSABLE UNITS - 7
ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $1,948.29 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $1,859.21 PER ASSESSABLE UNIT
ASSESSABLE COST: $13,014.47
COUNTY CHARGE: 7 Parcels @ $0.50 each parcel 3.50
$13,017.97
TO BE SPREAD OVER 10 YEARS - 1976 thru .1985
FIRST YEAR PAYABLE WITH 1975 TAXES COLLECTED IN 1976
FIRST YEAR'S INTEREST FIGURED @ 5% OF TOTAL PRINCIPAL TIMES 1.24 (452 days)
)41b P
5201 Schaefer Road
Edina, Minnesota
August 12, 1975
Ms. Florence Hallberg
4801 W 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
Mr. Dunn has advised us to direct this letter to you.
We are requesting reimbursement for a second.sewer asses-
ment made on our property and paid for December 31, 1968.. This
involved trunk water main #212 assessed September 16, 1968, for
the amount of $110.91.
It has never been our intent to develop our back lot area.
We were unaware in 1968 of the option of giving a certification
of non - development. In addition, it appears the development
of the Byerly property likely precludes any potential sub-
division by us.
There seems to be no point in paying for a sewer.connection
that will never be used. Thank you for your consideration of
this matter.
Sincerely,
John and Carole Kyllo
5201 Schaefer Road
Edina, Minnesota
August 12, 1975
Ms. Florence Hallberg
4801 W 50th St.
Edina,-Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. HQllberg:
Mr. Dunn has advised us to direct this letter to you.
We are requesting reimbursement for a second sewer asses-
ment made on our property and paid for December 31, 1968. This
involved trunk water main #212 assessed September 16, 1968, for
the amount of.$110.91.
It has never been our intent to develop our back lot area.
We were unaware in 1968 of the option of giving a certification
of non - development. In addition, it appears the development
of the Byer- ly- prope- r- ty- l- ike -1 -y- precludes any- potenta -1 -sub-
division by us.
There seems to be no.point in paying for a sewer connection
that will never be used. Thank you for your consideration of
this matter.
Sincerely,
John and Carole Kyllb
DONALD WEST
WALDO F. MAROVART
JON W WINDHORST
HENRY HALLADAY
JULE M. HANNAFORD
ARTHUR B. WHITNEY
RUSSELL W. LINDOUIST
DAVID R�BRINK
HORACE HITCM
VI RGIL H. MILL
ROBERT V. TARBOA
ROBERT J. JOHNSON
M.B. MASSELOUIST
PETER DORSEY
GEORGE P.%LANNERY:
CURTIS L. ROY
ARTHUR E. WEISBERG
DUANE E. JOSEPH
JAMES 8. VESSEY
WILL A WHITLOCK
E. J. SON WARTMAUER
THOMAS M. BROWN
CORNELIUS D MAHONEY
THOMAS S -ER IC' SON
WILLIAM C. 13ABCOCK
MICHAEL E. BRESS
RAYMOND A, REISTER
JOHN J TAYLOR
BERNARD G HEINZEN'
DORSEY, MARQUART, WINDHORST, WEST 8, HALLADAY
WILLIAM J HEMPEL
JOHN S. HIBBS
ROBERT O. FLOTTEN
JOHN D. LEVINE
ROBERT J STRUYK
MICHAEL A OLSON
LARRY W JOHNSON
THOMAS 5 MAY
G. LARRY GRIFFITH
CRAIG A BECK
DAVID L M:CUSKEr
THOMAS 0 MOE
JAMES M. G'HAGAN
JOHN M.MASON
MICHAEL W WRIGHT
LARRY L. VICKREY
LOREN R KNOTT
PHILLIP M MARTIN CURTIS L. STINE .
REESE C JOHNSON MICHAEL TRUCANO
CHARLES J HAUENSTEIN JONATHAN VILLAGE CENTER WILLIAM J. KEPPEL
CHARLES A GEER CHASKA, MINNESOTA 56318 JAMES A. FLADER
JOHN C. ZWAKMAN ( 612 ), 448 — 4012 WILLIAM,A. JOHNSTONE
JOHN R -WICKS - - - - - WILLIAM E. BOWEN
EUGENE L. JOHNSON - WILLIAM P. LUTHER
JOHN W. W! I: DHORST. JR. DOUGLAS VMCFARLAND
MICHAEL PRICHARD 115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST DAVID L. BOEHNEN
WILLIAM R -SOTH ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901 ALAN O. GILLILAND
THOMAS R MANTHEY (507) 288-3156 LAWRENCE R. OLIVER
RICHARD G SWANSON - FRANK M. VOIGT
2300 F IRS T NATIONAL B A N K BUILDING
fAITM L OHMAN
DAVID A. RANNEIN
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA S S 4 O 2
ROBE J SILVER MAN
WILL R. HIBBS
JOHN D. KIRBY
(612) 340 -2600
PHILIP F. BOELTER
WILL B. PAYNE
- CABLE: DORO W
. JAN STUURMANS
- -
TELEX:29 -0605 -
0. A SCHWARTZBAUER-
- STEVEN K. CHAMPLIN
- TELECO PIER :(612) 340 -2866
oAwo N.FRONEK -
.THOMAS W. TINKMAM
JON F. TUTTLE
1466 W —FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROSE A HEIBERG-
- 5T. PAUL, MINNESOTA 65101
CMIRI W. BARTLE
(612) 227 -8017
MICHAEL J RADMER
-
.
PAUL SCHEERER
September 17, 1975
Mr. Robert C. Dunn
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Refund of Second Sewer Assessment to John and
Carole Kyllo per their written request dated
August 12, 1975.
Dear Mr. Dunn:
John and Carole.Kyllo have asked that the second 1968 sewer
assessment be returned to them. :They previously paid the assessment
without protest.
Although the courts in Minnesota have not specifically con-
fronted this question, the law is summarized in McQuillin, Municipal
Corporations as follows:
"A municipality has no.authority or power to '
compromise, abate or cancel assessments legally
levied unless specifically authorized by
statute, at least where municipal bonds have
been issued in anticipation of collection
and payment of assessments." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.338 (McQuillin, 1970).
"The Legislature may authorize refunding of
moneys paid for public improvements, and
statutes and ordinances in the various juris-
dictions provide for a refund or rebate of
assessments levied and collected for public
improvements, under specified conditions,
provided the claim therefor is made within
the time prescribed by law, but the whole
question is governed by the terms of the
statute involved." 1.4 Municipal Corporations,
§ 38.336 (McQuillin, 1970).
WILLIAM E MARTIN
WILLIAM N. HIPPEE, JR.
STEPHEN G. SHANK
ROBERT A. BURNS
TONI A. BEITZ
MICNEL A. LAFOND
BRADFORD L. FERGUSON
ROGER J. MAGNUSON
J. ROBERT HIBBS'
JAY COOK
STANLEY REIN
CHARLES L POTUZNIK
VERLANE L ENDORF
DENNIS BURATTI
GEORGEANN BECAER
ROBERT HOBBIN5
BARRY D.GLAZER
PETER HENDRIASON
NICKY MAY
IRVING WEISER
STEPHEN GOTTSCHALK
THOMAS ELKINS
OF COUNSEL
DAVID E. BRONSON
LEAVITT R. BARAER
GEORGE E. ANDERSON
ROBERT L VANFOSSEN
C D nn
Mr. Robert. u September 17, 1975
Page 2.
"Special assessments may not be recovered
back, though paid under protest, except in
accordance with the statute.". 14 Municipal
Corporations,.§ 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970.).
Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections�435.202 & 435.203 provide for a refund
of special assessments under certain circumstances, none of which apply.
to the above situation. Our research has revealed no other express
statutory . authority for granting refunds of special assessments.
Furthermore .,. it is "well settled.that voluntary payment of
special assessments cannot be recovered, even though the assessment be
void." 14 Municipal Corporations Section 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970):
Accord, Hunter vs City of Minneapolis, 171 Minnesota 309, 2-13 N.W. 916
(1927).
It is our opinion, therefore, that the City of Edina has no
authority to refund to John and Carole Kyllo any part of the sewer
assessment which they paid without protest in 1968.
'?f you have any further questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
YyA
Tho as S. E ickson
TSE /jcs
w
5201 Schaefer Road
Edina, Minnesota
August 12, .1975
Ms. Florence Hallberg
4801 W 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
Mr. Dunn has advised
us to direct this letter to you.
We are requesting reimbursement for a second sewer asses -
ment made on our property
and paid for December 31, 1968. This
involved trunk water main
#212 assessed September 16, 1968, for
the amount of $110.91.
It has never been our
intent to develop our back lot area.
We were unaware in 1968 of
the option of .giving a certification
of non - development. In addition,
it appears *he d ° ^e'_ ^rment
of the Byerly property likely precludes any potential sub -
division by us.
There seems to be no
point in paying for a sewer.connection
that will never be used.
Thank you for your consideration of
this matter.
Sincerely,
�: John and Carole.Kyllo
DORSEY, MARQUART, WINDHORST, WEST $ HALLADAY
DONALD W EST
WILLIAM J HEMPEL
2 3 O O F I R S T N AT I O N A L B A N K B U I L D I N G
FAITH L OHMAN
WALDO FMAROUART
.
JOHN S HIBBS
DAVID A RANHEIM
JOHN W. WINDHORST
ROBERT O. FLOTTEN
ROBERT J, SILVERMAN
HENRY HALLADAY
JOHN D, LEVINE
M I N N E A P O L I S, M I N N E S O TA 55402 -
WILLIAM R. HIBBS
JULE M. HANNAFORD
ROBERT J STRUYK
- JOHN D. KIRBY
ARTHUR B. WHITNEY
MICHAEL A. OLSON
PHILIP F. BOELTER
RUSSELL W LINDOUIST
LARRY W JOHNSON
- (612) 340 -2600
WILLIAM B. PAYNE
DAVID R. BRINK
THOMAS 5 HAY
- CABLE: DOROW - -
JAN STUURMANS
MORALE HITCH -
G. LARRY GRIFFITH
- -
R. A SCHWARTZ BAUER
VIRGIL M.HILL
CRAIGA BECK
TELEX: 29 -0605
STEVEN K. CHAMPLIN
ROBERT V. tAR80%
DAVID L M<DUSKEY
TELECOPIER :(612) 340 -2868
DAVID N. FRONEK
ROBERT J. JOHNSON
THOMAS 0. WOE
THOMAS W. TINKHAM
K B, HASSELOUIST
JAMES H. O HAGAN
-
JON F. TUTTLE
PETER DORSEY
JOHNM. MASON
- 1468 W -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROBERT A HEIBERG
GEORGE P.FLANNERY
MICHAEL WRIGHT
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
EMERY W. BARTLE _
CU FITIS LROY
ARTHUR E. WEISBERG
LARRY L VICAREY
LOREN P KNOTT
(612) 227 -8017
MICHAEL J RADMER -'
PAUL SCHEERER
DUANE E JOSEPH
PHILLIR'H MARTIN
CURT IS L. S71NE
JAMES B. VESSEY
REESE C, JOHNSON
MICHAEL TRUCANO
WILLIAM A WHITLOCK
CHARLES HAUENSTEIN
- JONATHAN VILLAGE.CENTER
.. WILLIAM J. KEPPEL
E. J. SCH'WARTZBAUER
CHARLES A GEER
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318 -
JAMES A. FLADER '
THOMAS M. BROWN
JOHN C. ZWAKMAN
(612) 448 -4012
WILLIAM A JOHNSTONE
CORNELIUS D MAHONEY
JOHN 'R. WICKS
WILLIAM E. BROEN
THOMAS S. ERICKSON
EUGENE L. JOHNSON
- - _ -
WILLIAM P. LUTHER
WILLIAM C. BABCOCK
JOHN W WINDHORST,JR.
DOUGLAS D. MCFARLAND
MICHAEL E. BRESS
MICHAEL PFIC HARD
.115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST
DAVID L. BOEHNEN
RAYMOND A REISTER
WILLIAM R. SOTH
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA SS9O1 -
ALAN O. GILLILAND
JOHN J TAYLOR
THOMAS R MANTHEY
_ - (507) 288 -3156
LAWRENCE R. OLIVER
BERNARD G HEINZEN
RICHARD G SWANSON
FRANK H. VOIGT
September 17, 1975
Mr. •Robert C. Dunn
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Refund of Second Sewer Assessment to John and
Carole Kyllo per their written request dated
August 12, 1975.
Dear Mr. Dunn:
.. .John and Carole Kyllo have asked that the second 1968 sewer
assessment be returned to them. They previously paid the assessment
without protest.
Although the courts in Minnesota have not specifically con-
fronted this question, the law is summarized in McQuillin, Municipal
Corporations as follows:
"A municipality has no authority or power to
compromise, abate or cancel assessments legally
levied unless specifically authorized by
statute, at least where municipal bonds have
been issued in anticipation of collection
and payment of assessments." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38..338 (McQuillin, 1970). .
"The Legislature may authorize refunding of
moneys paid for public improvements, and
statutes and ordinances in the various juris-
dictions provide for a refund or rebate -of
assessments levied.and collected for public
improvements, under specified conditions,
provided the claim therefor is made within
the time prescribed by 'law, but the whole
question -is governed by the terms of the
statute involved." 14 Municipal Corporations,
§ 38.336 (McQuillin, 1970).
WILLIAM E. MARTIN
WILLIAM H. HIPPEE, JR:
STEPHEN G. SHANK ,
ROBERT A. BURNS
TON A. BEITZ
MICHEL A. LAFOND
BRADFORD L FERGUSON
ROGER J. HAGNUSON'
J. ROBERT HIBBS
JAY COOK
STANLEY REIN
CHARLES L, POTUZNIK
VERLANE L ENDORF
DENNIS BURATTI .
GEORGEANN BECKER
ROBERT HOSSINS
-BARRY D.GLAZER
PETER HENDRIASON
KICKY HAY
IRVING WEISER
STEPHEN GOTTSCHALK
. THOMAS ELKINS
OF COUNSEL
DAVID E. BRONSON
LEAVITT R. BARKER,
GEORGE E. ANDERSON
ROBERT L.VANFOSSEN
DORSEY, MAROUART, WINDHORST, WEST & HALLADAY
Mr. Robert C. Dunn
Page 2
September 17, 1975
"Special assessments.may not be recovered
back, though paid under protest, except in
accordance with the statute." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970).
Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections 435.202 & 435.203 provide for a refund
of'special assessments under certain circumstances, none of which apply
to the above situation. Our research has revealed no other express
statutory authority for granting refunds. of .special assessments.
Furthermore, it is "well settled that voluntary payment of
special assessments cannot be recovered, even though the assessment be
void." 14 Municipal Corporations Section 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970).
Accord, Hunter vs City of Minneapolis, 171 Minnesota 309, 213 N.W. 916
(1927).
it is our opinion, therefore, that the City of Edina has no
authority to refund to John and Carole Kyllo any part of the sewer
assessment which they paid without protest in 1968.
Tf you have any further questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
TTas h S . E ickson
TSE /jcs
0.
„1
DORSEY, MAROUART, WINDHORST, WEST & HALLADAY
Mr. Robert C. Dunn
Page 2
September 17, 1975
"Special assessments.may not be recovered
back, though paid under protest, except in
accordance with the statute." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970).
Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections 435.202 & 435.203 provide for a refund
of'special assessments under certain circumstances, none of which apply
to the above situation. Our research has revealed no other express
statutory authority for granting refunds. of .special assessments.
Furthermore, it is "well settled that voluntary payment of
special assessments cannot be recovered, even though the assessment be
void." 14 Municipal Corporations Section 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970).
Accord, Hunter vs City of Minneapolis, 171 Minnesota 309, 213 N.W. 916
(1927).
it is our opinion, therefore, that the City of Edina has no
authority to refund to John and Carole Kyllo any part of the sewer
assessment which they paid without protest in 1968.
Tf you have any further questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
TTas h S . E ickson
TSE /jcs
5201 Schaefer Road
Edina, Minnesota
August 12, 1975
Ms. Florence Hallberg
4801 W 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
Mr. Dunn has advised us to direct this letter to you.
We are requesting reimbursement for a second sewer asses -
ment made on our property and paid for December 31, 1968. This
involved trunk water main #212 assessed September 16, 1968, for
the amount of $110.91.
It has never been our intent to develop our back lot area.
We were unaware in 1968 of the option of giving a certification
of non- developaert. In addition, it appears t ^� �`.,el ^pment
of the Byerly property likely precludes any potential sub-
division by us.
There seems to be no point in paying for a sewer.connection
that will never be used. Thank you for your consideration of
this matter.
Sincerely,
John and Carole Kyllo
Mr. Robert C. Dunn .
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Refund of Second Sewer Assessment to John and
Carole Kyllo per their written request dated
August 12, 1975.
Dear Mr. Dunn:
John and Carole Kyllo have asked that the second 1968 sewer
assessment be returned to them. They previously paid the assessment
without protest.
Although the courts in Minnesota have not specifically con-
fronted this question, the law is summarized in McQuillin, Municipal
Corporations as follows:
"A municipality has no authority or power to
compromise, abate or cancel assessments legally
levied unless specifically authorized by
statute, at least where municipal bonds have
been issued in anticipation of collection
and payment of assessments." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.338 (McQuillan, 1970).
"The Legislature may authorize refunding of
moneys paid for public improvements, and
statutes and ordinances in the various juris-
dictions provide for a refund or rebate of
assessments levied and collected for public
improvements, under specified conditions,
provided the claim therefor is made within
the time prescribed by law, but the whole
question is governed by the terms of the.
statute involved." 14 Municipal Corporations,
§ 38.336 ( McQuillan, 1970).
DORSEY,
MARQUART, WINDHORST, WEST 8,
HALLADAY
DONALD WEST
WILLIAM J HEMPEL 2300
F I R S T NATIONAL B A N K BUILDING
FAITH L OHMAN
WILLIAM E MARTIN
WALDO F. MAROUART
JOHN S. HIBBS
DAVID A RANHEIM
WILLIAM H. HIPPEE, JR.
JOHN W. WINOAORST
ROBERT 0, ROTTEN
ROBERT J. SILVERMAN
STEPHEN G. SHANA
HENRY HALLADAY
JOHN D. LEVINE
MINNEAPOLIS , MINNESOTA S S 4 O 2
WILLIAM R, HIBBS
ROBERT A BURNS
JULE M.MANNAFORD
ROBERT J STRUfK
JOHN D. KIRBY
TONIA SEITZ
ARTHUR 8- WHITNEY
MICHAEL A OLSON -
PHILIP F. WELTER
MICHEL A LAFOND
.RUSSELL W. LINDOUIST
LARRY W. JOHNSON _
(612) 340- 2600 -
WILLIAM B. PATNE
BRADFORD L FERGUSON
DAVID R. BRINK
THOMAS S MAY
CABLE: DOROW
JAN STUURMANS
ROGER J. MAGNUSON
HORACE HITCH
G. LARRY GRIFFITH
-
FLA. SCHWARTZSAUER
J. ROBERT HIBBS
VIRGIL M. HILL
CRAIG A BECK
TELEX: 29 - 0605
- STEVEN K, CHAMPLIN
JAY COOK
ROBERT V TAR BOX
DAVID L M<CUSXEY
TELECOPIER:(612) 340 -2868
DAVID N. FRONEK
STANLEY REIN
ROBERT J. JOHNSON
THOMAS O MOE
-
THOMAS W. TINKHAM
CHARLES L POTUZNIK
M.B. HASSELOUIST
JAMES M. OHAGAN
JON F. TUTTLE
VERLANE L EF40ORF
- PETER DORSEY
JOHN M, MASON
1468 W -FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROBERT AHEIBERG
DENNIS BU RATTI
GEORGE P. FLAHNERY
MICHAEL w. WRIGHT
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
EMERY W BARTLE
GEORGEANN BECKER
CURT15 L. ROY
LARRY L. V1CKPEY
(612) 227 - 8017'
MICHAEL J RACMEP
ROBERT HOfi BINS
ARTHUR E. WEISBERG
IOPEN R KNO ?T
PAUL SCHEERER
BARRY D. GLAZER
DUANE E. JOSEPH
PHILLIP H MAPTIN
CURTI5 L. STINE
PETER MENORIASON
JAMES B, VESSEY
REESE C JOHNSON _
'MICHAEL TRUCANO
NICKY MAY
WILLIAM A WHIT LOCK
CHARLES J MAUEN57EIN
JONATHAN VILLAGE CENTER
WILLIAM J. KEPPEL
IRVING WEISER
E. J. SCHAARTZBAUER
CHARLES A GEER
CHASKA, MINNESOTA 55318
JAMES A FLADER
STEPHEN GOTTSCHALK
THOMAS M, BROWN
JOHN C. ZWAKMAN
(612) 448 -4012
-WILLIAM A. JOHNSTONE
THOMAS ELKINS
CORNELIUS D MAHONEY
JOHN R.WICKS
WILLIAM E. BOOEN
THOMAS S. ERICKSON
EUGENE L, JOHNSON
WILLIAM P. LUTHER
WILLIAM C. BABCOCK
JOHN W. IN N HORST. JR.
DOUGLAS D. MCFARLAND
OF COUNSEL
- MICHAEL E. BRESS
MICHAEL PRICHARD
115 THIRD STREET SOUTHWEST
DAVID LBOEMNEN
DAVID E, BRONSON
RAYMOND A REISTER
WILLIAM R. SO?H
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55901
ALAN D. GILLILAND
LEAVITT R, BARKER
JOHN J TAYLOR
THOMAS R MANTHEY
(507) 288-3156
LAWRENCE R. OLIVER
GEORGE E.ANCEPSON
BERNARD G. HEINZEN
RICHARD G SWANSON
FRANK H. VOIGT
ROBERT L. VANFOSSEN
September 17, 1975
Mr. Robert C. Dunn .
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Refund of Second Sewer Assessment to John and
Carole Kyllo per their written request dated
August 12, 1975.
Dear Mr. Dunn:
John and Carole Kyllo have asked that the second 1968 sewer
assessment be returned to them. They previously paid the assessment
without protest.
Although the courts in Minnesota have not specifically con-
fronted this question, the law is summarized in McQuillin, Municipal
Corporations as follows:
"A municipality has no authority or power to
compromise, abate or cancel assessments legally
levied unless specifically authorized by
statute, at least where municipal bonds have
been issued in anticipation of collection
and payment of assessments." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.338 (McQuillan, 1970).
"The Legislature may authorize refunding of
moneys paid for public improvements, and
statutes and ordinances in the various juris-
dictions provide for a refund or rebate of
assessments levied and collected for public
improvements, under specified conditions,
provided the claim therefor is made within
the time prescribed by law, but the whole
question is governed by the terms of the.
statute involved." 14 Municipal Corporations,
§ 38.336 ( McQuillan, 1970).
DORSEY, MAROUART, WINDHORST, WEST B. HALLADAY
Mr. Robert C. Dunn September 17, 1975
Page 2
"Special assessments may not be recovered
back, though paid under protest, except in
accordance with the statute." 14 Municipal
Corporations, § 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970).
Minnesota Statutes 1974, Sections 435.202 & 435.203 provide for a refund
of special assessments under certain circumstances, none of which apply
to the above situation. Our research has revealed no other express
statutory authority for granting refunds of special assessments.
Furthermore, it is "well settled that voluntary payment of
special assessments cannot be recovered, even though the assessment be
void." 14 Municipal.Corporations Section 38.333 (McQuillin, 1970)."
Accord, Hunter vs City of Minneapolis, 171 Minnesota 309, 213 N.W. 916
(1927).
It is our opinion, therefore, that the City of Edina has no
authority to refund to John and Carole Kyllo any part of the sewer
assessment which they paid without protest in 1968.
Tf you have any further questions, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
Tho as S. EAckson
TSE /jcs
3 L•
5201 Schaefer Road
Edina, Minnesota
August 12, 1975
Ms. Florence Hallberg
4801 W 50th St.
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Hallberg:
Mr. Dunn has advised us to direct this letter to you.
We are.requesting reimbursement for a second sewer asses -
ment made on our property and paid for December 31, 1968. This
involved trunk water main 4212 assessed September 16, 1968, for
the amount of $110.91.
It has never been our intent to develop our back lot area.
We were unaware in 1968 of the option of giving a certification
of nori- de:%ciopme:7L:.. In addition, it appears the development
of the Byerly property likely precludes any potential sub
by us.
There seems to be no point in paying for a sewer.connection
that will never be used. Thank you for your consideration of
this matter.
Sincerely,
John and Carole Kyllo
i
September 29, 1975
Mr. Warren C Hyde
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Warren:
SUN NEWSPAPERS
6601 WEST SEVENTY - EIGHTH STREET
EDINA, MINN. 55435 • 941 -4800
We are changing the publication day of our papers from Thursday
to Wednesday,.which necessitates new deadlines, particularly for
your official public notices.
In order to help avoid delays in publishing your notices, we
must establish the following new procedure which will require
your anticipating council action. Your official notices should .
be pre - prepared and in our office by 2 :00 p.m. on the Friday be-
fore your council meeting. We will set the type in advance, but
you will be able to change the date or withdraw the full notice
between 11:00 p.m. and 12:00 p.m. Monday night by calling our
night superintendent, Mr. Bob Olin. We will not be able to make
,major changes or additions in the notice nor accept any substitu-
tions. Mr. Olin's night telephone number is 941 -7228.
It is our understanding this will not cause too much inconvenience
on your part, and we trust this internal cooperation will preclude
any major delays in your regular operations.
Very truly yours,
James R. Ritchay
Executive Vice President
M E M O R A N D U M
October 6, 1975
=.e- -"(-�
MEMO TO: Council Members
FROM: Ken Fbsiand, Director
Park and Recreation Department
SUBJECT: Braemar's Electrical System for Boulevard Lighting
Heaters for Braemar Golf Course
The following are two bids which have been received for rewiring Braemar's
electrical system for the boulevard lighting.
I. United Electric Corporation - $3,869.95
2. Northland Electric Supply Company - $4,003.95
After much discussion with Norther States Power and the prices they were to
charge the City of Edina for maintenance of this system, it was deemed
advisable to own the system and to do the necessary repairs. This is the
first step for the long range program for re- working the present system. '
This amount spent comes well within the amount saved.
Recommend award to United Electric Corporation.
Also two bids have been received for the replacement of the heaters at the
Braemar Club House.
I. Fred Vogt and Company Inc. - $984.00
2. Rouse Mechanical - $1,374.00
The present heaters do not function and are considered mechanically unsafe.
Recommend award to Fred Vogt and Company Inc. for $984.00
RFCM TTTTl1TTT
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition; and
The West 76 feet of the North 150 feet of Lot 9, Warden Acres; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts
into the following new and separate parcesls (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition and the following described tract:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's
Addition; thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 3, a
distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly at right angles to the West
line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10 feet; thence Northerly,
parallel with the West line of said Lot 3, to the South line of
Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of beginning; and
The W. 76 feet of the North 150 feet of,Lot 9, Warden Acres, except
the following described tract: Beginning at the Northwest corner
of Lot 3; Block 1, Fridlund's Addition; thence Southerly along
the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly
at right angles to the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10
feet; thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Lot 3,
to the South line of Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of
beginning; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the pur-
poses of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of
Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however,
to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless
made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October,1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October
6, 1975, and as recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of October, 1975.
City Clerk
t
1 n'
1 Y_
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition; and
AU= -&f 'the West 76 feet of the North 150 feet of Lot 9,
Warden Acres t:
Beginning at th Northwest corner of Lot lock 1, Fridlund's
Addition; thence So rly along t est line of said Lot 3 a
distance of 65 feet; then sterly at right angles to the West
line of said Lot istance �Lo ence Northerly,
parallel w' the West line of sa the South line of
Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to f beginning; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts
into the following new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition and the following described tract:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's
Addition; thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 3, a
distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly at right angles to the West
line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10 feet; thence Northerly,
parallel with the West line of said Lot 3, to the South line of
Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of beginning; and
The W. 76 feet of the North 150 feet of Lot 9, Warden Acres, except
the following described tract: Beginning at the Northwest corner
of Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Additi®n; thence Southerly along
the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly
at right angles to the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10
feet; thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Lot 3,
to the South line of Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of
beginning; and
r
RES OTATT T nN
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
pLot �3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition; and
Lot Y,'WZAen Ures�; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts
into the following new and separate parcels herein called'Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition and the ifese -76 feed -` th M
following described tract:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's
Addition; thence Southerly along the West line of said Lot 3, a
distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly at right angles to the West
line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10 feet; thence Northerly,
parallel with the West line of said Lot 3, to the South line of
Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of beginning; ands
. ter e� t� �.
6 Lot 9; Warden Acres d fold Beginning at° -tie' _.�r *_h�:�est t
corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's Addition; thence Southerly along
the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 65 feet; thence Westerly
at right angles to the West line of said Lot 3, a distance of 10
feet; *_hence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Lot 3,
to the South line of Warden Avenue; thence Easterly to the point of
beginning; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and onership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however,
to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless
made in compliance with the'pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1975.
i�malti�t�,C;�y
t7t
VL
UJ--�
El
e-
ele
. MAP
lot division
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -10
LOCATION: 5709 Warden Avenue
REQUEST: divide strip of excess
land from sanitary lift station site
to add to adjacent single family lot.
yslime ylanninQ department village of a ins
low •
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 24, 1975
LD- 75 -10, City of Edina for Donald C. Brower. Generally located at 5709 Warden
Avenue. The West 76 . feet of the North 150 feet of Lot 9, Warden
Acres.
Refer to: Attached survey of 5705 Warden Avenue.
Mr. Donald C. Brower, 5705 Warden Avenue, has received authorization from the.
City Council to buy a 10' X 65' strip of excess land from the Tracy Avenue
sanitary lift station site to add to his property (Lot 3, Block 1, Fridlund's
Addition) so he can convert his single car garage to a double garage and maintain
the required setbacks. See the attached survey.
Approval is recommended.
R. Dunn /ln
9/19/75
SURVEYOR
.. `! 129 WEST LAKE STREET r �� MINNEAPOLIS !, MINN. t
JAI 7
01ETR1CN - FRANCIS CO.
• ,,�,��c For -
'
WAR DEN AvE.
lot �
1
1
0
� e M
.
I At
d
OESCR I PT I CN;
LOT 3, BLOCK 1,
FRIDUY-4J'S AJJITIC,J.
SCALE:: I" — 301
ZA
EI• 'lifo`' - - 74,G7 --- ..Jpot)
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of
the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buiId'In;;--,
if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any', from or on said land.
a ted t h-i s 21£T day of MACH 1rJr(. EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK
Surveyors
2 _ I uQZ n� �, �. ,. 11;3C. _. E,7 bV. ... .
^
1i
.Y
a c
c
�4��Q�•�
Proposr -_ - bu.i iding
'
o o
N '
v>
t
_
{ f
I�
Ei
o
•
v
T
•�
r
Q
Li�v
��
tip
i
•1
.
I At
d
OESCR I PT I CN;
LOT 3, BLOCK 1,
FRIDUY-4J'S AJJITIC,J.
SCALE:: I" — 301
ZA
EI• 'lifo`' - - 74,G7 --- ..Jpot)
We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of a survey of
the boundaries of the land above described and of the location of all buiId'In;;--,
if any, thereon, and all visible encroachments, if any', from or on said land.
a ted t h-i s 21£T day of MACH 1rJr(. EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK
Surveyors
2 _ I uQZ n� �, �. ,. 11;3C. _. E,7 bV. ... .
D'VQ nT TTTTONT
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Lot 2, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Outlot C, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into
the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Outlot B, Gleason's Fifth Addition together with the Southwesterly 10.0 feet
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition, except the Southwesterly 10.0
feet thereof, and that part of Outlot C, Gleason's Fifth Addition lying
Westerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the most Easterly
corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the North line of Outlot C) thence South-
westerly 60.28 feet more or less to a point on the South line of Outlot C, a
distance of 45.80 feet East of the most Westerly corner thereof; and
Lot 2, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition, and Outlot C, except that portion
thereof lying Westerly of the following described land: Beginning at the
most Easterly corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the North line of Outlot C)
thence Southwesterly 60.28 feet more or less to a point on the South line of
Outlot C, a distance of 45.80 feet East of the most Westerly corner thereof;
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Sub-
division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos.
801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1975.
i z
RESOLUTION 4801 WEST FIFTIETH STREET - EDINA, MINNESOTA 58424
927 -8861
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Lot 2, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Outlot B, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Outlot C, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said tracts into
the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Outlot B, Gleason's Fifth Addition together with the Southwesterly 10.0 feet
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition, except the Southwesterly 10.0
feet thereof, and that part of Outlot C, Gleason's Fifth Addition lying
Westerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at the most Easterly
corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the North line of Outlot C) thence South-
westerly 60.28 feet more or less to a point on the South line of Outlot C, a
distance of 45.80 feet East of the most Westerly corner thereof; and
Lot 2, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition, and Outlot C, except that portion
thereof lying Westerly of the following described land: Beginning at the
most Easterly corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the North line of Outlot C)
thence Southwesterly 60.28 feet more or less to a point on the South line of
Outlot C, a distance of 45.80 feet East of the most Westerly corner thereof;
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Sub-
division and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos.
801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this.Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1975.
r
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October
6, 1975, and as recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of October, 1975.
City Clem
:� � Y ?��:
\� �
. ,:; .
.1� 5
• � � � � 1
.. .. . a. -
Village of BEdlna
4501 WEST FIFTIETH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
927 -8861
RRC0T_TTTT()N
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land are now separate parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
I
Outlots B// and C, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to combine said
tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein
called "Parcels "): u,
Outlot B, Gleason's Fifth Addition n the Southwesterly 1(1.0 feet
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's rifth Addition; and
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition except the Southwesterly
10.0 feet thereof, and that part of Outlot C, Gleason's Fifth Addi-
fL tion lying Westerly of a line described as follows: t*Begirning at
the most Easterly corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the forth line
of Outlot C) thence Southwesterly 60.28 feet more or less to a
point on the South line of Outlot C, a distance of 45.80 feet East
of the most Westerly corner thereof; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hard-
ship and said Parcels as separate tracts of .land do not interfere with the
pruposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City
of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 811;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordnance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof-, and subject, however.,
to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless
made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1975.
�r � '� i
MCA III 4 '
1q"
V
kIG.G ti... SCHa fEp C'
cc Z r'�' <,NCeR B
to
APEL HILL
GAI IONAL
AV
CCU —`Y TR 41
— WESr
s CR6ssviEw
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -5
South of Vernon Ave. &
LOCATION: West of Gleason Road
REQUEST: division of outlot and
lot and combinations.
ice' I W •_ •
Jl
J� `• •• ••• • ;i1
yj rge planning d lrlment viifpl'xe of edilin
■
r
■
1q"
V
kIG.G ti... SCHa fEp C'
cc Z r'�' <,NCeR B
to
APEL HILL
GAI IONAL
AV
CCU —`Y TR 41
— WESr
s CR6ssviEw
REQUEST NUMBER: LD -75 -5
South of Vernon Ave. &
LOCATION: West of Gleason Road
REQUEST: division of outlot and
lot and combinations.
ice' I W •_ •
Jl
J� `• •• ••• • ;i1
yj rge planning d lrlment viifpl'xe of edilin
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 2, 1975
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C,
Gleason's Fifth Addition, and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's
Fifth Addition. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue
and west of Gleason Road.
Refer to: Attached site graphic and graphic showing
resulting lots.
The proponent is requesting two lot divisions and 2 combinations
involving two lots and two outlots. The proponent indicates he
will then pursue a logical lot trade involving a combination or
perhaps two combinations to create a buildable lot out of outlot B.
The result is shown on the attached graphic.
Recommendation: While the staff has no objections to the result,. .
it is concerned that all of the proponent's desires may not come
to pass thus resulting in an even more complicated layout, and
very undesirable lots. Therefore, the staff recommends that the
request be held until negotiations regarding the combination of the
outlots is cc:pletcd, a-n at that time the entire site be platted
so that clarification of lot lines, ownership, and buildability
would be established.
GL: In
6/27/75
pa
rf of Lot 5 \e
4Z 4j
°•b 1 0
�a FIRST A '�b ''
•, `• 3 \ ' j 441
its_ '� b r� >'l• ° -ro . -i �, t-'
-jam yS,•...�° - o .� \ I •\\Z--• y� • \1Q "26 • -`% •�'�,��4 ^.�:
- aJ,•r°,
ROAD
M x.`.11.. -T - � c ° Qe''�� o �. .e •r �>" ♦:
_ -,— 1 ; T rD
OUTLO .
Al
LLJ
�`ro - ' r_ I I �� j?;j L•� `'','l:c�ft Mh\ \0 i. /�^ , °`� ° \ 25 rcn It r t
�e� •u 1 = i •J 1 'i, /;- P,. 0 6 1 `�'i .W.o �v° _ a. 3 v- Z c�
`:{ n
' I z 1 2 ,° ,�•L -, . v' 4.'r \ �C ` f• S rj 'r s . -?9 5 i1: 2 3 il: 7 5 Q.
--
-.o v, tt� \ ^° =b Qi1 \ 5 j raj• '� `o ' r� n d O • C.
c� �' `gig 6? �� X5 %0 ('�: �: \ / I �I 1 3�'S: ;� r✓ cr•
• `•� \o 'J•' �� ,L as ti Q � nE�l �i3:✓� c..�
I4' • —_o• J 23��,��° v
Cj
'!•'.�� () (-fit o 3 0. ! �� 1., J,. V
9 3 1f 4 a, a ,r
G L E A S 0 N N, 0 �J F \� ' t_Y ``_ _- �3 ° 22 _ ,,, s
( - „ t t - ,
4
FIRS T A o, 0,, 2 .: _% 0 o It , - 2 a
Jv p �• I
Ld
OL
�1 v! moo, y' `„ \ 5 6° S .,IY h n 6 Q - - -m
's `✓ S° ��` °� 7
\ o o 19
\ 1 nS ��1 ��f 1 ^� 0` \�
a 0 7
�'l'\� ! ! �•. ''� a Y,": rim h^ . .Did -
``; r \ `�I�� ;. ' \; {;•fit b� �h" s 14 �� 9.SC \\ \ r�E °o e h'o I ?C Jt I8 10 v o-
• r•b " 2 ``d' dSS. .•9'Si:7N ti8 s� �iS� �� _ �;�: 30�30
13g =bedj
mss. 9 �W
,`i• ~ �, ,mot - - "�' •,' `: ° 5
b Poi •r,.r. :n _. .�.
n.
o : t� •: -air•? - • " p �: '/" .\. c- �, `' \ \° 0 W - v.,N .n 4. •-
f C'. .� 1 \� 5� T 5 N Q� •rte v� �' C[9
ti ~. e ti oo � � _ , � o- °'. EAST • •• .� '�'`
� _ "V 'S�-. ., c•, •_� , o, -. 6r a,. .>r �o bC�� r, �� !� n•- A'8A
1• 'U 'l i7 /' .. ci+ 'Ei"'Crt[.' S9 9' j �O /A� 7 1� —`•_.
IC -
.cfl 's i• �•� ✓t.�• ".° c; ''e;•S' \ (gC9 \ '�itiS °v o, v __ _..— p IN -1� O a
- - �•� _ .:, t` . �- / iI.°' d � ✓! "` � .F ; " `:� .r :>' I � , .1 ` 7 . _ �> . �\� f Y O c, . r r � l3 b5 `7� )9d 5] f ..�J:�, ,>� �- `i�srm '. � u' ' 47r, W _s `�� g'•i.� � � - % 1 �^' - l.4S `2 t
12 " -o'
✓1• .
�.6'-
\may
�,IS
/. 'S ✓'• da; C •,•I P1. -` N � ') �'io ,, \ ?ti'cc.2: : o11c._ ,, .,kr :; •a
X94=.
:•>, 'C r ^r� � ^1 I 'S • -�'\1\ 6.. .�.; �3 .:.• •D ,., rp � -i'd. `J �01 r-
2
7.
•I•,, - - J �' 1 i,V I \ I f `I
_ � G _f c
- I r•��_J` _ it a�J �.. ?iq '`'-,'. - -- -
6a ^•i o�'1�-- ( -�. \-1 I1/. -. - -_��r C
—WAY iN� }, ;,r . /,owl` ��� (�t«� ^•T �, _Y�
qu
tK
65. 6 to
C 4' M' ` �• 7 ° °` N 8 ice' �•• . rJ f' •A
rq„�laa t Y6 35� ti P OUTLOT A
,. 3
v 64
110 0 '\
25� loo
15.... „Q' E � ' ' 12 �Y
x:49 �: .aa '• �'',:b ',�,� ^ rllco ,. `c Drat �`+'�d,Y�`. .D °4 OJ, •�P
��lj 10 DO 1'89
7 7 7S •
100 �3{ �9 587 "'9j3 rn< _ .
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS
6440 FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, NI;NN. 55343
CERN77,11MCATE OF SURIVEY
Survey For: r
Book Page
Descriv,tion:
Outlot 5, Gleason's Fifth Adrlil%,.-ion -ind the -South�-,a,-,terly 10.0 fcot of
Lot 3, Block.1' Glel-ison'-, Fifth o'%rle
0 -!jtje-,n.
I h*rcby cortify that this Isla true and cirr"t rep-@"n1c1;on of a carver of tho boundo4cs of
� "'Z c^1 -Honnap;A COVAt). M:nnowlo and of 0i al, b' ifT-11 'Con, .-I ci!
Visible onci"chrnrnli, if any, from or an #-aid land. Svrrored by me this --day of
r A N1 I I r Q- rCSc r i C i i
CARDARELLE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LAND SURVEYORS
EYORS
f440.FLYING CLOUD DRIVE 941.3030 EDEN PRAIRIE, MINN. 55343
CEI pt, 6911 9Ile", A 7 CA ®b 19 U r z V E if
Survey For: - - --
JE
i
. �ook - Page
Descri. ?t ion
Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason's Fifth Addition except the Southwesterly 10.x'.
feet. thereof, and that past of Catlot C, Glea;:on's Fifth Ad,:i.tion
lyinq I esterly of a line described as follows: Beginning at th=e rr:os:;
Easterly corner of Lot 3, (also a point in the t:ort.h`line of Outlot C)
thence Southwesterly 60._`8 feet more or less to a r>oint.on the South
line of Outlot C, a distance of 45.130 feet East of the most Wasterly-
corner thereof.
I horoby certify that 1hla li a true and corr"I repra&enlolion of a tvrvoy of the boandor{et of.
: - i Y,ennepin County, Minnow aid o! the location of oil b 61nyr fhore�n, end ,::;
v4iblo oncroochmentt, if any, from or on paid land. Surrcyod by me this i ~ day
CARDARME & ASSCCIATLS, IN -C. �-
�Fr
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G.W. Pearson. Outlots B and C, Gleason Fifth
Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Fifth Addition. Generally
located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Gleason Road.
Mr. Luce stated that two divisions and two subsequent combinations of
properties within Gleason Fifth Addition are requested. He explained that Outlot C
is proposed to be divided; the easterly portion would be combined with lot 2 and
the westerly portion would be combined with lot 3. In addition, a 10 foot strip
equal to the square footage of that westerly portion of Outlot C is proposed to be
divided from the west side of lot 3 and added to Outlot B. The proponent will then
pursue a land trade and further property combinations to make Outlot B a buildable
lot and eventually have it rezoned for a double bungalow.
Mr. Luce stated that although he has no objection to the anticipated results,
he is concerned that the addition of 10 feet from lot 3 to Outlot B would make
Outlot B the minimum size for a single family lot. If Outlot B of Gleason 5th
Addition and Outlot B of Viking Hills 4th Addition, presently under separate owner-
ship, are not eventually combined and rezoned as expected, the proponents could
request that Outlot B of Gleason Fifth Addition be declared a buildable, although
7 -2 -75 Planning Commission Minutes, page 2
undesirable, single family lot. He suggested that because all of the parcels are
being modified by this request or are proposed. to be modified in the future, further
negotiations with the owner of Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition, and a repiat
of part of Viking Hills 4th Addition and all of Gleason Fifth.Addition might be
more appropriate.
Mr. Greg Gustafson, representing the proponents, Mr. Jeffrey Gustafson and
Mr. G. W. Pearson, explained that Mr. Pearson, who owns and occupies a home on Lot 2,
has constructed a tennis court on the easterly portion of Outlot C; division of
that outlot is therefore requested so the portion with the tennis court can be
added to Mr. Pearson's lot (lot 2). Mr. Gustafson recalled that lot 3 was sold
almost a year ago with a one year option allowing the west 10 feet of that lot to
be traded for a piece of Outlot C of equivalent square footage; the necessary
divisions of Outlot C and .lot 3 are requested now while the proponents still have
the right by option to swap those parcels. Mr. Gustafson further explained that
the proponents own Outlots A and B of Gleason Fifth Addition, and, ,although Mr.
Harliev Helle owns lot 11 and Outlot B of Viking Hills 4th Addition, he has
indicated that he is not ready to discuss the purchase or trade of those outlots.
There is, however, no intent to make Outlot B buildable for a single family house.
Mr. Gustafson felt the proponents should not be required to replat the entire area
at once because they are not in control of all of the lots and outlots, and it
would be inappropriate and unfair to ask them to wait until Mr. Helle is ready to
discuss the matter.
After discussion regarding the assessed valuation of Outlot B, whether that
outlot is or would be considered a buildable lot, and about an ultimate land swap
with Mr. Helle, Mr. G. Johnson indicated he would contact Mr. Helle and discuss the
matter with him in an attempt to initiate the necessary transfers of land and
overall replatting.
Mrs. McDonald moved the request be continued to
meeting, and Mr. C. Johnson seconded the motion. All
who abstained. Motion carried.
the next Planning Commission
voted aye except Mr. G. Johnson,
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
July 30, 1975
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C, Gleason Fifth
Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Fifth Addition. Generally located
south of Vernon Avenue and west of Gleason Road. Continued from 7 -2 -75.
Refer to: July 2, 1975, Planning Commission staff report and minutes.
The Planning Commission may recall that at their last meeting this matter was
held over pending discussion with the adjoining property owner, Mr. Helle. The
Planning Staff is still concerned that should this division occur, outlot B would
be of a size sufficient for the owners to request that it be declared a buildable
lot for a single family home. It is our opinion that that is an extremely poor
use of the land, and should the two property owners not be able to work out their
differences, the staff would recommend denial.
GL:ln
7/25/75
._. vauc•:a�� ..
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C, Gleason Fifth
Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Fifth Addition. Generally.
located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Gleason Road. Continued
from 7 -2 -75.
Mr. Luce stated the requested lot divisions and combinations involving two
outlots and two lots in Gleason Fifth Addition were discussed at the July 2, 1975,
Planning Commission meeting. He recalled that Outlot C is proposed to be divided;
the easterly portion would be combined with lot 2 and the westerly portion would be
combined with lot 3. In addition, a ten foot strip of land is proposed to be divided
from the west side of lot 3 and added to Outlot B. Denial was recommended because
the addition of that 10 feet. to Outlot B would provide the minimum square footage for
an extremely undesirable single family lot, and a request could then be made to have
it declared buildable.
Mr. Luce noted that although Outlot B of Gleason Fifth Addition and Outlot B
of Viking Hills 4th Addition are expected to be combined eventually and rezoned to
R -2, the outlots are presently under separate ownership and that combination cannot
be guaranteed at this time. He_added that since the 7 -2 -75 meeting, Mr. Glen Nybeck,
attorney for. Mr. Harliev Helle, informed him that an arbitration hearing is scheduled.
for August 25th to determine the ownership of Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition,
because there is a question regarding the number of lots Mr..Helle purchased from
Mr. Krahl. Mr. Nybeck also indicated that Mr. Helle is not necessarily opposed to the
long range concept, but he cannot negotiate with Mr. Gustafson until after the
hearing on August 25th. Mr. Luce stated that until the combination of those outlots
can be consummated, presumably after August 25th, he would continue to recommend
denial.
Mr. Jeff Gustafson, the proponent, further explained the arbitration matter
between Mr. .Icllc and ..r. .._a "l, 'pct added that in opinion the ownership of
Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition, and the possible combination of that outlot
with Outlot B of Gleason Fifth Addition is totally irrelevant. He explained that
when he sold Lot 3, he retained an option to keep the west 10 feet, and although
the owner is presently willing to relinquish that 10 foot strip onto Outlot B, he
may not be willing to do so in the future. Mr. Gustafson stated that if his request
is approved, Outlot C "would be taken off the books and would become taxable land ".
The [-lest 10 feet of lot 3 and Outlot A would be added to Outlot B, "taking both of
thoseoutlots off the books because they would become one single family lot'. When
an agreement with Mr. Helle can be reached, R -2 zoning would be requested for lot 1.1
of Viking Hills 4th Addition as well as for the combined outlots. lie felt that if
7 -30 -75 Planning Commission Minutes, page 2
the divisions are not approved, "we would lose our right to be in a better bargaining
position because we would own only Outlot B, which isn't buildable, and Mr. Helle
would own Lot 11, which is buildable ".
After further discussion, Mr. Hughes moved the requested lot divisions and
combinations be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting after the
scheduled August 25th arbitration hearing so the owner of Outlot B, Viking Hills
4th Addition, and Mr. Gustafson can meet and hopefully consummate the proposed land
trades. Mr. Kremer seconded the motion. All voted.aye except Mr. G. Johnson, who
abstained. Motion carried.
� IA
d
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 3, 1975
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C,
Gleason Fifth Addition and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Fifth
Addition. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue and
west of Gleason Road. Continued from 7 -2 -75 and 7- 30 -75.
Refer to: Enclosed letters and previous Planning
Commission minutes.
The arbitration hearing that was scheduled for August 25th to
determine finally who owns Outlot B, Viking Hills 4th Addition,
was rescheduled for September 5th, thus it is impossible for a
decision to be made at the September 3rd Planning Commission
meeting. The attached letter from Glen Nybeck indicates a desire
of one of the persons directly involved to have this matter
continued until after the arbitration hearing is completed and
the ownership established.
The staff recommendation is to continue this matter to the
next Planning Commission agenda (September 24, 1975).
GL:ln
8/29/75
.;3
i
LD -75 -5 Jeffrev P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C, Gleason Fifth
Addition, and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason Fifth Addition. Generally
located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Gleason Road. Continued
from 7- 2- 75 &7- 30 -75.
Mr. Luce reviewed the requested lot divisions and combinations involving two
lots and two outlots in Gleason Fifth Addition. He recalled this matter was
9 -3 -75 Planning Commission Minutes, page 3
discussed at the 7 -2 -75 and 7 -30 -75 Planning Commission meetings, and was continued
pending the outcome of arbitration to determine the owner of Outlot B, Viking Hills
4th Addition. Mr. Luce reported that the arbitration hearing, originally scheduled
for August 25th,. was rescheduled for September 5th. He stated the staff is still
concerned that the addition of 10 feet (from lot 3) to Outlot B, Gleason Fifth
Addition, would provide the minimum square footage needed to create an extremely
undesirable single family lot. He recommended the requested divisions be further
continued to the 9 -24 -75 Planning Commission meeting, by which date an arbitration
report should be available.
Mr. Luce stated that letters from Mr. Glen Nybeck (representing Mr. Harliev
Helle) and from Mr. Jeff Gustafson (the proponent) have been received; Mr. Nybeck
asked that the request be postponed until the ownership of Outlot B, Viking Hills
4th Addition, has been determined, and Mr. Gustafson asked that there be no further
delays and that his request be approved.
Mr. Jeff Gustafson, the proponent, requested a decision be made at that meeting .
because: in his opinion the present request has no bearing on any future land trade
with Mr. Helle and Mr. Krahl; the present owner of Lot 3 can cancel his option for
the west 10 feet of that lot at anytime at will; no one contacted him in response
to his phone calls and letters regarding the details of a land trade or to inform
him that the arbitration hearing was postponed and rescheduled; and, if the request
is granted, Outlot B (Gleason Fifth Addition) would still be an unbuildable outlot
because it would not have adequate lot depth. He reiterated that "we are not asking
anything of the owners to be determined. We are just asking to include the tennis
court on the appropriate lot, and the owner of Lot 3 wants to know how wide his lot
is. He emphasized that if he is not able to acquire the west 10 feet of Lot 3, it
will be impossible to accomplish the future lot divisions and combinations needed
to provide adequate square footage for R -2 zoning for the three lots directly
west on Vernon Avenue.
After discussion, Mr.- Kremer moved the request be continued again to the
next Planning Commission meeting (9- 24 -74), as the results of arbitration to
determine the ownership of Outlot B, Viking .Hills 4th Addition, will not be
available until after the hearing on September 5th. Mr. C. Johnson seconded the
motion. All voted aye, except Mr. G. Johnson, who abstained. Motion carried.
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
September 24, 1975
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C, Gleason
Fifth Addition, and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason .Fifth Addition.
Generally located south. of Vernon Avenue and west of Gleason
Road. Continued from 7 -2 -75, 7 -30 -75 & 9 -3 -75.
The staff has not been made aware of the outcome of the arbitration
hearing on the ownership of Outlot B, Viking Hills loth Addition. Until
such time as the ownership is decided by the court, it is,impossible for
us to move. in any direction or to make a recommendation to the Gustaf sons
to move in any direction, and in the staff's opinion, to approve lot divisions,.
etc., which may result in a condition unfavorable to the city's best interests.
GL:ln
9/18/75
9 -24 -75 Planning Commission Minutes,
LD -75 -5 Jeffrey P. Gustafson /G. W. Pearson. Outlots B and C,
Gleason Fifth Addition, and Lot 3, Block 1, Gleason
Fifth Addition. Generally located south of Vernon Avenue
and west of Gleason Road. Continued from 7 -2 -75, 7- 30 -75,
and 9 -3 -75.
Mr. Luce stated the requested lot divisions and
combinations involving two outlots and two lots in Gleason Fifth
Addition were discussed -a -t the July 21, July 30, and September 3
Planning Commission meetings. He recalled that-Outlot C is
proposed to be divided; the easterly ,portior+ ould be com'Di'ized with
lot 2 so an existing tennis court cou e a ed to the owner's
lo r, and the wes_ er yTot'ron wolf°tscomb:irtred— oath— l-ot°-� . A
10 Toot strip of equal square footage is proposed to be divide
from t e wes psi e of lot �oand._a. ded o Outlot-B---°Out-lot-B of—"
Gleason Fifth Addition and Outlot B of Viking Hills 4th Addition,
presently under separate ownership, are expected to.be combined
eventually and rezoned to R- He stated his primary concern is
still that the addition of 10 feet from lot 3 to Outlot B would
provide the minimum square footage needed to create an extremely
undesirable single family lot, and a request could then be made-to
have Outlot B declared buildable.
Mr. Luce recalled the proponent's request was continued
from the July 30 and September 3rd Planning Commission meetings
pending the outcome of arbitration to determine the owner of Outlot B,
Viking Hills 4th Addition. However, because the arbitrator has
still not made a decision and has taken the matter under, advisement
until additional information is supplied by one of the attorneys
involved, he would now recommend the proponent's request be approved
with the notation that Outlot B will remain an unbuildable outlot
in the future.
Mr. Greg Gustafson, representing the proponents, stated
that because we are not a party to that law suit, the result will
not immediately affect us. We can only deal with the land we
control. He stated the west 10 feet of lot 3 is crucial to the
future divisions and.rezonings along Vernon Avenue, and the owner
of lot 3 is now willing to exchange that westerly 10 feet for part
of Outlot C.
After discussion, Mrs. McDonald moved the requested lot
divisions and combinations be approved, with the specific notation
that Outlot B will continue to be.unbuildable in the future because
it will remain an outlot and because it would not have adequate
depth for a single family lot. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion.
All voted aye. Motion carried.
I
Honorable City Council,,
My Grandfather, Gust..A. Johnson, platted
G.A. JOHNSON'S SOUTHWOOD Vn 1951. About a year
later, he and my parents built the home where 1
grew up. A little later he built a home for my
Grandmother and himself - just up the hill from
ours. SOUTHWOOD was my stomping ground.
During the last ten years or so, my Grand-
father has been wondering outloud why the small
marsh -land he donated to the Village in '52 hasn't
been named for him. I understand that donating
a few lots from a plat one happens to own doesn't
automatically qualify them to expect that said
lots.will be named for them. Nevertheless,
told Grandfather I'd give it a try.
This small marsh is generally thought to
be part of PAMELA PARK. However, the marsh is
not contiguous with PAMELA PARK. It is separ-
ated from the main park by West 58th Street.
feel I am justified in asking that the
park area north of West 58th Street be named
for my Grandfather for the reasons I give in
the resolution.
. I hope the Council will vote yes for this
resolution. You can depend on me to organize
a dcdication my Crandfather will never forget!
6 October 1975
Thank you,
Ralph Campbell, III
WHEREAS, the Village Council of Edina at a regular meeting thereof un
14 April 1951 did approve and accept the plat called G.A. JOHNSON'S SOUTHWOOD;
and
WHEREAS, said plat did provide to "donate and dedicate to the public for
public use forever the street, lane, park and avenues as shown on the annexed
plat. "; and
WHEREAS, said park is now considered to be part of Pamela Park which was
part of a different plat and donated by a different person;
:.NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that:
1.. Said park be officially renamed GUSTAF ,.A.,JOHNSON PARK.
2. Said park be officially dedicated as such.
3. The Edina Park and Recreation Department be authorized to
execute said dedication, incurring no expense.
.A
Thank ou,
Ralph Campbell, III
6 October 1975.
/,wn m•n•w.w/ -` Q Je�Ati /in •/Jr
...r� ... . ...........I
;3
1 �a
I ()
C7.A.JOHNSON 5
SOUTHWOOD
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Y1
Y �
,YI
;Y I
D
PROPOSUD • ruSTnr- A. JOiIN ON PARK
't I tiCRAN5 P..l1Ili A: •4P!W;k ,
n
a:
t
1:
't :
W,
ti.
h,
�SE car, o /NE /r ai
Sec• ry, rrrer
i
Kna w a7 // men 6 y 117 ere ore renlr ffiof we, GuJ /A ✓ala -YOn and Hu /do ✓kVon,
hul d wile owners ondproprrctor,J• of f/re 1'o / %w.i�9 c%scri6ed property
%/1'e a6y terr f y /hof l hove ruryeyed and0101 /ed %iie properly deler.6edr� fhr; p /ot
rSOUrNwa.Niff
a,le k,
si /ue.'e in Me Sfafe of AJrnnvo% and County of/1'ennep%n /u wit; Comrnenc%n9
offht soufjfeoJfcorner /6e Nor /heos/ Quvrfer
ar GA.%aNNjavV al1'h,s p/O'f /J O COrreGf repreJBnfpf /a/7 O %JO/dJKvey; fhaf
o / /c/rffonceJ are correcf /y ,>fiown on fhe p /of in leaf ondcfec %.nu /t ofofvOf,•Jhof 1'i%
of (hE 4J of.feclicn /5, Twnrhip Z8
�P0 re Z4, /hence nor/Yi gbng Ale easlhire ofsaidJErl gdrJ /onre of 90feef lh&;Ce
Tonamenlr for yurdance of fufarr rurveyt have been co^recf /y pfoced., ;1'e ground
wcrfoo -o /fef wifh ffe Ja�hS fire of fhe Narff+eo r; Qucrfer(NE / ofseidscrfinn a
d.i,"0nce of Zg6. 4f feel; fbcxc 7or, /,Odra11e1 W11/r the east hne %on
of shown on hie p /o% !`ho / ;ht oufsiJe 6oundory hneJ orr correcffy o�eJrgnofer/mso�
plat; fhaf /fie %poyroph y of /he fond rt cwmelly Jhawn on fhe ,0101 and shut fhe-r
ofso/S.rec
o c.lfonceof /951' f l,4encr weslp0re11e/ W11h 111C ,1111'/, / /ne olfhe Narfheosf
ore no wet /ono's or pu6 11'c hr9hways to he des%gnafed on Joidp /of alher fhon 0s
�uar /er (NE %yJ O%JOid Jecbc' n 1'o Me wesf fine of Me Easf yoff(E %z1' 01114C
shown thereon.
. Sou. �eoJ/ Qucrfcr(Sre'/ of fiSe Narf/, Bull Quorfer (NE %tJ oj,roid secfion; /hence
/�r
nn' /h along Jard wesf fine to �e nor //, /ne of fhe � O&11i Quurfer(Syy /o /fi5e
.fcUKearA Qunrfr�SE' /y /of lfie&01*lheasf Quorfer(NE %/ofJar(tJCCf fhelwe well
SurYeyor- N/•iin. Reg. No. /.0 �
/o fhe narJhwerf corner ofJOid .%ull; Quorfer(S %t /; /hence Joufh to fhe soufhwerf
corncr of ;he Soo lYieoJl QuOrfer(SE�/ of /fie Nor //,easf Qunrfer (NE %a / of Joid
46eve earfifi�ofC Ju6scri6ed acrd ✓warn 1'o bejort me fh/t _day of �R� AO /912
Jrcfrcn,• thence east /0 14C ,00%n1 of 6e)y er(SQ nr fQf
c'ffheSOU /,SwcJf Qunrrhr(Jiv!K/
n / +tic;' /vrffieosf Quorfer (NEY�J of Sec ;ion /g,
T wn•lhrp 1B ROnye 7'1', a /JO�esl,arfh.Fwr• /y.srx(9G/ frc /af!fie,mv,55 pne,f�y�
�)�� Q, �µ, ,��
71
,frrt}rafi rr (/GS!,.•,- r•,J.�/r;3ie. east.); vc. /imr �rdni/lcfy- crgfii vnc/;'of- (.29d,..J, :e1' fhe.
+ Ya- �ro�cf_( �kro- fcr_{ h' E: G�vf .fcc'.FrcFS- /_9_- Tc.xrrJhr��B fi'.anye �•9s
Nokrypu6hc 19ennepinCaunfy, /7iarelda
My Eomml:rxion exo'r'es
have caused hie Jame /0 6e Jlrveyed andp /of /ed�OJ GA..7aNNSONS SO(/7NW000 qr�
doherebydonofe onn ded.,or, loffiepu6/ c` rorpu6 /tureforevertlie.rfreef /0nG
pork ond0venueJ orshown on fhe gnnexedp /at /n wrfness whereej we hove
Th4,0101 was approved and occepfed 6t' fhe l/i%faye Counci /of Edlno
hereunto Jef our //ands pndseo /J lhrs c%y of AD 15,.5-2,
Miisnesolo' a/ a rryu /ar rneetiiry /hereof he /d /his /'t dayof„� /P /iL AO /9S/
l
n reJenCG o/
/
� % J / :•
4 luiria J�bn�un •.•�d �J " "�`� Ir�JEALJ
/10 /do 4 ✓04n0on �4 r :9��
eJidenl
Sfo le ojrtl naeJde /
j •C'• ••�
J.S.
C0u�tyofHenxprn On lkj d•
C /ark
Pub. %c wif5:n and Jbr JordCounf and Jf oype A 0. 1952 6eflre me, o Nofory
Y 0W, mono //y oppeorrdGuJ /rq. ✓o/inson and
1'/a /dy ✓uhnsan hrJ rife, to me known to he /hepersons dercri6ed rig and who
erea,ledlhe/a -go%ng r�r /ruvnen/ a d /fret' ac4now/edyrd /6ofiliey execufad//re
Jame as h%ir own) '_ aK/ and
1 Nar{ery pu6/� /rEimeepin Caunl�r Alinrlrsr/e
I
F-
�0
NEWSLETTER'
T. G. EVENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Municipal Finance Consultants
Affiliate of Northwest Bancorporation
First National Bank Building
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
612/338 3535
OCTOBER 1975
Municipal Market Conditions
WHENCE THE ECONOMY AND THE CAPITAL MARKETS?
ECONOMIC TRENDS
Inflation, unemployment and interest rates all are likely to remain at relatively high levels
well into 1976, according to most analysts, despite political desires to moderate these
problems before the bicentennial elections. There are some early signs of the beginning
of a modest business cycle recovery such as the August rise of 1.5% in industrial output
following the July gain of 0.5 %. The next several months of the recovery will be charac-
terized by stress and change (e.g. auto and housing markets) rather than a simple return
to previous levels of prosperity.
MONEY AT A PRICE
The capital markets continue to exhibit the stresses from marked changes in both the sup-
ply and demand sectors. Following a most unstable period of interest rate fluctuations
which_beganw_ith the energy crisis_in the fall of 1973, the capital markets are in factwork-
ing and handling anhistorically high volume of demandat a record high level of long term
interest rates. The 20 -year bond buyer index reached a record high of 7.49 %on Septem-
ber 18th. Sizeable deficits of the U.S. Government and New York City are only two ex-
amples of factors contributing to the present situation. The coming months and years will
be characterized by new and innovative ways of meeting the capital needs of government
and industry. Meanwhile, inflation and the high costs of capital will continue to be major
factors in the process of allocation of limited capital resources amongst the heavy demand
sectors. Recent indices of interest rates are shown below:
Week of September 22nd Range 1970 -75
Bond Buyer Index 7.49% 7.49 % - 4.28%
Moody's Corporate Average 9.54% 9.82 % - 6.97%
Prime Rate 8.00% 12.00 % - 4.50%
FRB Discount Rate 6.00% 8.00 % - 4.50%
ITEMS IN THE MIDWEST
Dr. Rodney Pakonen who heads up our Analytical Department participated in a panel dis-
cussion of advance refunding at a Wisconsin MFOA meeting in Appleton on September 25th.
Also on the agenda was a discussion of newly enacted budget legislation and its possible
constraints on levies and the marketing of securities. Michael Sparks, our consultant in
Iowa, attended the Municipal League convention in Sioux City (September 21 -23) and will
be in Des Moines on November 13 -14 for the School Board convention. Walter Dornfeld
attended the North Dakota League conference in Fargo on September 12 -14. And in South
Dakota, Robert McCrea convened in Pierre with members of the Municipal League on Sep-
tember 11 -12.
We have moved our offices within the First National Bank Building to 1910. We also have
anew telephone number - 612/338 -3535. Please stop and see us when you are in Minnea-
polis. Our representatives and staff are ready to assist you with your financing needs dur-
ing the challenging period ahead.
Bond Buyer's Index
7.50%
7.25%
7.00%
6.75%
6.50%
6.25%
6.00%
5.75%
5.50%
1974 1975
Visible Supply
Millions (AT MID MONTH)
of $
1625 - - - - - ----------------------
1500
1375
1250 - - -- ''
1125 - -- - -- ___
1000 - --
875 - - -
750 - -- -
600
S O N D J F M A M J J A R
1974 1975
Recent Bond Sales
Amount
Moody's
Sale Date
Issuer
(0001s)
Purpose
Run
BBI
Rating
NIC
Sept. 17
Ramsey Co., Mn.
11,420
Ad. Deten. & Juv. Center
78/90
7.40
Aa
5.972
16
Wykoff, Mn.
70
Municipal Building
77/86
"
NR
6.488
16
Sleepy Eye, Mn.
280
G. 0. Water Rev.
77/91
"
A
6.19
15
Manitowoc, Wisc.
1,500
Promissory Notes
77/83
11
Aa
5.334
15
Janesville, Wisc.
2,110
Corporate Purpose
76/84
"
Aa
5.328
10
Kandiyohi Co., Mn.
425
G. O. Drainage
77/91
7.34
A
6.057
9
Mpls. SSD #1, Mn.
5,100
School Building
77/85
"
Aaa
5.370
9
Bowman PSD #1, N. D.
415
School Building
77/94
11
A
6.762
9
Madison, Wisc.
3,500
Street Improvement
76/85
11
Aaa
5.256
9
Urbandale, Iowa
885
Street Construction
77/90
11
A
5.835
9
Minneapolis, Mn.
9,385
Improvement
76/85
"
Aaa
5.231
9
Minneapolis, Mn.
4,010
Special St. Impr.
76/95
11
"
5.981
8
Sciota Township, Mn.
17
Bridge Construction
77/84
"
NR
6.000
8
Buffalo, Mn.
275
G. 0. Improvement
77/86
"
Baa
5.958
8
Maple Grove, Mn.
1,250
G. 0. Improvement
78/87
11
Baa -1
6.476
3
Augusta JSD, Wisc.
1,500
School Building
78/90
7.18
A
6.455
2
Mendota Heights, Mn.
925
Temporary Improvement
8 -1 -78
"
Baa -1
5.430
2
Minot, N. D.
640
Temp. Impr. Warrants
8 -1 -76
NR
5.09
2
Moorhead, Mn.
850
G. 0. Improvement
78/91
A
6.144
Aug. 28
Luxemburg - Casco, Wisc.
1,700
School Building
78/91
A
6.521
27
Center City, Mn.
345
G. O. Temp. Impr.
9 -1 -76
NR
5.000
27
Goodview, Mn.
295
G. 0. Improvement
77/91
"
Baa -1
6.581
26
Thief River Falls, Mn.
2,800
G. 0. Temp. Hospital
9 -1 -77
"
Baa -1
5.198
26
Maquoketa CSD, Iowa
850
School Bonds
77/91
"
A
6.105
26
Crookston, Mn.
560
G. 0. Redevelopment
78/97
"
A
6.733
25
Winner, S. D.
416
G. O. Wtr. Sys. Ref.
76/89
"
A
6.433
25
Spring Lake Park, Mn.
124
G. 0. Tax Incre.
77/86
Baa -1
6.346
25
Bloomington, Mn.
2,500
PIR
76/96
A -1
6.407
21
West Fargo, N. D.
1,150
G. O. Refunding
77/90
7.17
A
6.247
20
Cottage Grove, Mn.
625
Improvement
77/95
"
A
6.591
20
Osseo IDS #279, Mn.
2,675
School Building
77/86
11
Baa -1
6.164
19
Fort Atkinson, Wisc.
620
Waterworks Mtg. Rev.
77/94
11
A
7.218
19
Mpls. SSD #1, Mn.
26,000
Certificates of Indebt.
9 -17 -76
"
MIG -1
4.629
18
LaMoure, N. D.
345
Refunding Impr.
76/96
11
NR
6.649
18
Sauk Rapids, Mn.
230
Liquor Store Rev.
76/86
11
NR
6.969
18
North St. Paul, Mn.
630
G. O. Temp. Impr.
9 -1 -78
"
Baa -1
5.441
12
Beuna Vista, Iowa
750
County Home
77/87
7.16
Aa
5.334
12
Staples ISD #793, Mn.
1,315
State Aid Cert.
9 -1 -76
"
NR
5.179
11
Renville Co., Mn.
225
Improvement
77/91
"
A
6.333
11
Storden- Jeffers Sch #178, Mn 75
School Building
78/87
"
NR
5.926
6
Wahpeton, N. D.
600
Ref. Improvement
76/95
7.09
A -1
6.378
5
West Des Moines, Iowa
1,500
School
77/91
11
A -1
5.934
5
Chippewa Falls, Wisc.
1,400
School Building
77/93
"
A -1
6.724
5
Jackson, Mn.
50
Hospital
78/82
"
NR
5.892
4
Burnsville, Mn.
2,015
Refunding
76/89
"
A
6.135
July 29
Bismarck, N. D.
1,600
Ref. Improvement
76/95
7.22
Aa
6.264
29
State of Wisconsin
50,000
Series D.
77/00
"
Aaa.
5.994
28
Albert Lea, Mn.
385
G. O. Hospt. Rev.
78/89
A -1
6.017
28
Sartell, Mn.
565
G. 0. Improvement
77/86
"
Baa
6.102
23
Plymouth, Mn.
6,050
Improvement
77/90
7.09
A
6.20
22
Luverne, Mn.
203
G. 0. Water Rev.
78/87
"
A
5.412
21
Menomonie, Wisc.
1,130
Corp. Purpose
77/91
11
A
6.470
A V
s A,
THOMAS E. TICEN 0 PHONE
CHAIRMAN },. L� 348 -3088
�NN85�
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487
October 1, 1975
Pursuant to Section 3, Subdivision 3, Chapter 738, Laws of
Minnesota, 1963, the Board of Hennepin County Commissioners
is submitting to you the attached budget revenue and tax
levy schedule necessary to sustain the operation of the
Hennepin County Medical Center and other health functions
for the year 1976. Said budget was approved by the Board
at its September 30, 1975, meeting.
For comparison purposes, the suburban levy for Hennepin
County Medical Center support will be .463 mills for 1976
as opposed to 1.003 mills for 1975. This levy reduction is
primarily due to the State of Minnesota assuming ninety per-
cent of costs for medical care provided to medical indigents
at Hennepin County Medical Center.
Should the governing body of your municipalities have any
questions relating to the budget, the Board would be pleased
to provide the appropriate information.
Sincer _y1___
Thomas E. Ticen, Chairman
Board of County Commissioners
RESOLUTION NO. 75 -948
SEp 301975 .
Commissioner Olson
offered the following resolution: 1
BE IT.RESOLVED, that the 1976 estimated tax rates for the proposed
1976 Hennepin County Medical Center budget as attached hereto be submitted
to the clerk of each municipality in accordance with Section 3, Chapter 738,
Laws of Minnesota, 1963.
The question was on the adoption of the resolution and there were
four YEAS and one NAYS, as follows.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
BOARD OF COUNTY.COMMISSIONERS. YEA NAY OTHER
Richard 0. Hanson X_
Thomas L. Olson _ X
John E Derus X
E. F. Robb Jr. _X
Thomas E. Ticen, Chairman - X_
Resolution adopted.
ATTEST:;`.0
Deputy County Auditor
U
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER FUND EP 3Q 1975
1976 BUDGET REVENUE AND TAX LEVY S J
BUDGET - OPERATING COSTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $42,640,359
LESS:.
Estimated receipts from patient charges . . . . . . $30,890,735
Miscellaneous revenue from Medical Center services 1,616,700 '
Grants and reimbursements . . . . . . . . . . 7,634,141
Medicare settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . -
Delinquent and miscellaneous taxes . . . . . 110,000
Personal.property tax reimbursement . . .
Operating carryover . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 40,251,576
AMOUNT REQUIRED FROM CURRENT PROPERTY TAX LEVY . . . . $ 2,388,783
MEDICAL CENTER OPERATING FUND TAX REQUIREMENT - BASED ON
PERCENTAGE OF UNRECOVERED PATIENT COSTS FOR PERIOD 1/1/74.
T0.12/31/74:AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 738, LAWS OF MINNESOTA,
1963.
1974 UNRECOVERED PATIENT COSTS
PERCENTAGE . . . .
TAX REQUIREMENT FOR OPERATING
FUND APPORTIONED TO 1974
UNRECOVERED COSTS . . . .
CAPITAL AND PLANNING LEVY
NET AMOUNT REQUIRED FROM
PROPERTY TAX LEVY . .
ASSESSED VALUATION ESTIMATE
MILL LEVY REQUIREMENT AT 97%
COLLECTION RATE .
ADD BACK COUNTY RATE .
PROJECTED 1976 LEVY REQUIRE-
MENT . . . . .:.
JU /kjo
9/26/75
Suburban Entire
Hennepin Hennepin
Minneapolis County County
83.23 11.37 5.40
$ 1,988,185 $ 271,604 $ 128,994
- 1,175,000
$ 1,988,.185 $ 271,604 $ 1,303,994
$1,410,000,000 $2,438,000,000. $3,848,000,000
1.452
.114
.349
.349
1.801
.463
.349
GENE SYLVESTRE ASSOCIATES, 12006 BRIAR LANE, MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343 • (612) 545 -6163
September 265 1975
Mr. Warren Hyde
City Manager
City of Edina
4800 West 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
Dear Warren,
Below is a summary of our consultative activities for the period between August 25
and September 26, 1975.
TYPE OF HOURS
CONSULTING WHAT WAS DONE SPENT DATES
GENERAL Prepared articles and arranged distribution of Sept- 11.5 8/25 -28 -29
ember issue of HRC Newsletter. 9/2- 3 -12 -19
Continued assisting in development of forthcoming 11.0 8/25.
Family Life Workshop, including plans for special 9/4- 5- 9 -12 -15
session cA Asian refugees. 16 -17 -23
Held discussions with HRC Executive Committee 2.5 9/2 -5.
about future plans and attivrities.
Continued discussions with HRC chairman and treasar- 3.0 9/8 -12
er about proposed HRC budget for 1976.
Assisted in publicizing Indian forum co- sponsored by 3.0 9/9 -10 -15
HRC and Edina Library. Also held discussions with HRC
Community Education chairwoman on future forums for
Fall- Winter period.
Held series of discussions with representative from 0.5 9/8 -10 -22 '
Southside Human Services Council on study of needs of
elderly in Southwest suburbs.
Assisted in gathering information on food stamp pro- 0.5 9/16 -22
grams available for disadvantaged people in Southwest-
area.
Attended monthly HRC meeting. 2.5 9/16
Prepared monthly status report for City Manager 1.0 9/26
and HRC chairman..
EDUCATION Prepared discussion materials on Affirmative Action 6.0 8/26 -28
and met with representatives from School District 9/18
to discuss.
.September 26, 1975
EMPLOY!' Continued discussions with staff.member_of City's 1.5 :_9/12 -15 -18
Chamber of Commerce on proposed co- sponsored
.Affirmative .Action workshop for City businessmen.
.:TOTAL HOURS: 43.0
(r lye
-.c.c. Joel Jennings
The
EGGENGER
MORNINGSIDE COMI�NITY ASSOCIATION OF EDINA V01 ME 2- NUMBER 2
E. 6 SEPZMR 1975
�'. IMPETANT NOTICE IT'S A DOG'S WORLD...wELL NOT EXACTLY*;
_CHANGE OF MEETING DATE
' Dogs have to be licensed. And dogs which
The September meeting of the Association "habitually bark or cry" are forbidden
l has been changed to Wednesday, September 109 from being harbored by any person betwee n
at 8:00 P.M. at the Morningside Community the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m.
Building. 4117 Grimes Ave. Continuing through More importantly "no dog shall be permitted
the months thereafter, the regular 2nd to be off the premises of the owner (even
Thursday meeting schedule will be resumed. if it is spring) at anytime unless it is
leashed or accompanied by a person who has
s s s s s effective control over it by command as by
leash:;'
(Puppy lessons anyone?)
NOTES FROM YOUR PRESIDENT Section 17C of the dog ordinance which
states that no owner shall permit his dog
As we ap pro&ah our second yesa of- existence as to damage any lawn, garden or other property
an Association. we should take stock of our was amended to include the stipulation
accomplishments, reassess our usefulness as "no dog owner shall permit his dog to
a community "facilitator and observor" and micturate or defecate on public property
if everything comes out positive -- regenerate or on private property other than his own."
our commitment to work toward improving this This article is reprinted from
neighborhood as a desireable family life Jean Marie Hamilton's column entitled
environment. "Signs of Spring" which appeared
On the first count, we have strengthened our, in a May 1975 issue of The Edina Sun.
effectiveness through regular meetings, more residents of Morningsi— de have ca lied
(; and better communications, increased meeting the Association to complain about the
attendance and interest among residents. destruction of lawns and gardens and
Although the major project for the year. the other annoyances caused by unleashed,
street improvements package, has progressed uncontrolled dogs. Lets try to extend thA
toward a decision slower than we had hoped, principles of good neighbor relations
because of workload pressure at City Hall, it to our petal
is encouraging to note that the city adminis-
tration has carefully ' •
lly considered our input
at every step of the way. The Association.
as a sounding board for resident complaints HAVE YOU NOTICED ANY I1MPROVSMENTI
1 and suggestions has served a purpose At the May 8 meeting of the Association.
I Whenever consensus is reached, our opinion Don Ko et
as a group is far more persuasive in promoting j in of the Edina Parks Department
change than we would be as individuals and Jim Hayeh. Director of the Minneapolis
working through the governmett process. water Department( owner of the 10 acres
It will take time to build a track record on France Ave.) appeared to answer
of useful service to the residents of questions from residents about a number
Morningside. Volunteer organizations are of problems related to our open space in
fragile things -- subject to ups and downs horningside.
as crisis come and VD. We have'no right to In response to specific complaints about
self perpetuation, though. the abuse of Weber Park by motorised vehicles.
Your participation will determine whether the the Association passed a resolution asking
Association continues to function and its for better posting of the area and
course of direction in the future. improved police monitoring to stop the
The Nominating Committee will be searching motorcycle and mini -bike traffic before
for candidates for the offices of President, tragic injury occurs. During the summer .
Vice President. and Secretary- Treasurer for signs were placed at strategic locations
the annual election in November. New and it appears that the problem has
Committee heads and block workers will been corrected.
be appointed in December. If you believe The open space between Kipling and Lynn
we're doing something useful -- Volunteer Avenues near 42nd Street has been maintained
your time and effort. by the City as nature intended, except for
Call any of the following to join or offer the cutting of weeds on the periphery.
your help: This plan seems to be satisfactory to the
922 -4377 Len Fbrnelius neighboring residents. If not, we'll beep
920..4336 Kent Bank Vying for an acceptable compromise.
9294800 Dodie Bock
92t -373: Ron Ringling s
9264342 Jerry Weiss
Decay and'deteriora-tion'doesn't just happen --
it takes years of neglect and complacency!
Let's not lot it happen in morningsidelll
!'(TBLIC HEARING aN MOftN173GS. s 110YEMM
SET FOR AMBER 1 TH
hearing
The Edina City Council aril. hold a public
September 15th at 7:00
City Hall on the necessity and feasibility
Of constructing.improvements in the morning_
area. These improvements would include
the following :_ replacement of the water system,
replacement and /or addition of streets,
curbs, gutters and sidewaLes, completion of
Storm sewer project and the installation of
street lighting.. There will be a preliminary
meeting of the Morningside Community Ass-
ociation September 10th at 8 :OOp.m. in the
Community Center to discuss
Council hearing. this project and the
Attached to this newsletter is a recap of the
aide during
results from the survey conducted in Morning..
May and June. The number or responses
to the survey was exceptional
to that typically exceptionally good compared
rOsPonse rate in this caseced Based was the
number responding in favor �of making the the
Specified improvements, i.e.. those responding
that the improvements should be done only if
needed and those responding that the improve_
men ts are clearly needed, a substantial
majority of Morningside residents want the
improvements made.
S inions on the Improvements
However.. since the .shy was conducted,
the estimated .cost to each resident for
the improvements has changed dramatically
This is Primarily beeause a study of
the Morningside water system Was not
completed until August 14, 1975.
study concluded The
that the entire water
system should be 11 rePlaced. The current
estimate for this portion of the project
pe
is r h X1,93.95 per connection, i.e.,
eouse in the case of hingle family
dwm irgs. The exact cost for the entire
improvements project cannot be known
until firm bids are received.
Whatever the cost of this project,
there is considerable uncertainty about
whether the City of Edina will share
assuming for the - improvements, and
from what it Will, tb what extent and
what source of funds will the City
Pay for the improvements. n"ven if
the residents of "l- orningside agree that
the improvements are necessary,
there is the question, 1, can we
them-arid howl" This question afford
be asked at the publi should
c hearing.
It appears the City of Edina
is cutting back on proposed
funding of the proposed improvements,
We don't have all the details but
will by Wednesday for the M•C.A.E.
meeting.
WE URGE YOUR ATTENDANCE AT BOTH THE
M.C.A.F_ MrFTT.r.. _
Should
be done
Clearly
needed
4
Total
Useful
Should
Should
33
NOT be
Responses done
be done
13
ONLY if
Improvement
needed
Store: sewer
addition
Replace
308
36
59 $
water mains
308
Resurface
14
62
streets
Replace /install
318
9
57
curbs & gutters
315
Replace /install
16
58
sidewalks
Install i mproved
312
32
SS
lighting
308
36
3S
Preferred Term of
M ff
Upon com-
10 years
Selected as
pletion
most suitable
278
3 %
39 e
It appears the City of Edina
is cutting back on proposed
funding of the proposed improvements,
We don't have all the details but
will by Wednesday for the M•C.A.E.
meeting.
WE URGE YOUR ATTENDANCE AT BOTH THE
M.C.A.F_ MrFTT.r.. _
Should
be done
Clearly
needed
4
$
24
33
26
13
29
lS years 20 years
23t 34%
Throughout the past year, the Morningside Community
Association has worked closely with the city engineers office
to provide-information on residentsiviews about general,
Improvements needed in Morningsidew We were shocked to learn
that the water service proposal will cost about 3 times more
than original estimates andthat possibly all of the cost roust
be born by residents. This seems an excessive burden and
appears inconsistant with the practice in neighboring suburbs.
Further we were disappointed to learn that city financial.
suDoort for the murbs and gutters proposal also is less than
we originally thought . These late developments are of great
concern to the Associations Executive Board. If you feel the
same be sure to attend the meeting on September 15 to make
your views known to the City Council.
The regular monthly meeting of the Association will be
he).d on Wednesday September 10# at 8:00 pia at the Community
Building ( 4115 Grimes Ave.). Residents can use this meet-
ing to help the Association develop a position for the elty
council meeting.
I
.s
I
Will Uniform
Elections Provide
Greater
Participation
At Lower Cost?
DAVID SCHAAF
State Senator
On Monday, September 29 the
Minnesota Senate Elections
Subcommittee began hearings on
two bills which have already
passed the Minnesota House of
Representatives. The first, H.F.
700, provides that all municipal
elections be held in November.
Only about forty home rule charter
cities are affected by this bill since
all other cities now hold November
elections.
The second bill, 349, provides
that all school board elections now
currently held in May also be
changed to November. At the
September meeting I will have
made a major amendment to these
bills which will require that all
local elections be held in
November. of the odd - numbered
years. In other words, under this
proposed law all elections for city,
county and school board offices
would be held in November of the
odd- numbered years. All elections
for federal and state offices would
continue to be held in the even -
numbered years. This proposal, I
believe, will greatly increase the
ability of the average voter to
understand our democratic
process.
First, our voter will know he has
Senator Schaaf, DFL Fridley, is the author
of *the two election bills discussed in this
article.
October 1975
an election every November (with_
possible primary elections in
September). In the even- numbered
years the voter can concentrate on
state and national issues. In the
odd- numbered years the voter will
be concerned only with local
candidates and issues. Such a
system of regular annual
November, elections will help
increase participation, a goal
which during the bicentennial yeas
we all share.
Interestingly, a second benefi-
of this proposal will beto lower the
cost of holding elections. As an
example, this year the Bloom-
ington school board's May
election was conducted by the City
of Bloomington at a cost of
$10,000, or nearly $4.00 per vote. i
this election had been held i#
November at the same time as the
city's elections, the only extra cos'
would have been the printing of
school board ballot. Certainly
those cities which do not now ho �4
odd -year elections will experience
increased costs. At the same time
almost every school district 1N
Minnesota will save the cost 0f
conducting a separate election
However, we must keep in mind
who really pays these costs. It rs
the taxpayer, of course, and in
nearly every case fewer of his t� x
dollars will be spent to conduc7-
elections. .
It is my hope that every Ioct-L
official in Minnesota will take a N
honest, objective look at this
proposal and not reject it out -o�
hand. There remain a number of
technical problems which are noN
under study and can be resolved.
I would appreciate an�i
suggestions members of the
League might have concernint
these bills. We have at hand an
opportunity which presents itself
all too rarely in government — a
chance to make our own system of
self - governance more un -.
derstandable and at the same time
less expensive.
Status Report on
Local Government
Training Available
.The Local Government Training
Calendar Project has just issued a
new report which reviews the
status of local government training
in Minnesota and examines the
issues and problems which
surround this topic.
This "Status Report .1975 —
Local . Government Training in
Minnesota" is the first com-
prehensive review of training in
Minnesota. As such, it should
prove invaluable for all local
officials in orienting them to basic
concepts, state laws, the process of
organizing a training framework,
the need for training, and training
resources. While the Status Report
supplies previously inaccessible or
unknown information, it also
shows graphically that large gaps
in knowledge and use of training
still exist.
This is- the second step in the
Local Government Training
Council's process of analysis of
training which should lead to
recommendations for future
actions; the first step was the
printing of the Local Government
Training Calendar.
The Council, which oversees this
IPA (Intergovernmental Personnel
Act) funded program, has recently
been restructured to consist almost
exclusively of municipal and
county officials. This. should
ensure that the recommendations
which it makes are reflecting the
needs and capabilities of local
governments.
Copies of the report are
available free of charge from the
League office or from the Local
Government Training Calendar.
Project, Room 203, 55 Sherburne
Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55103, (612)
222 -5821.
11
September 16, 1975
Mr. Warren C. Hyde
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Hyde*
Thank you for your letter expressing your views on the
change in the Local Government Aid law. For the very reasons you
cited, my recommendation to the Legislature on the return of gross
earning aids to municipal governments would have been beneficial
to Edina ($371,000) and other suburbs. While my recommendation was
• passed in the House, it failed in the Senate. The law which re-
sulted was a compromise between the two bodies. It did include an
additional $20 million in local government aid.'.
During the Senate hearing at which the gross earnings
proposal was attacked by various senators and their proposal of
using mill rates to distribute local government aids was presented, my
only a few witnesses spoke in opposition. As I
tax advisor, John Haynes, and Dean Lund of the League of Minnesota
Municipalities attacked the Senate formula on some of the grounds
you cited. I very much wish that at that time the municipalities
which were adversely affected had testified.
Sincerely,
Wendell R. Anderson
WRA:mam
CC: Mayor of Edina
City Council
CO'•q-a`ERCIAL AREA PATROL - INCIDENT STA ISTIUS
August 1, 1975 - August 31, 1975
Cr`
DATE
TIME
INCIDENT
LOCATION
DISP.
75007352
8/1/75
1025
PD Accident
69th & France
A &A
75001357
8/1/75
1312
Vehicle Lock Out
Byerly's
A &A
75007362
8/1/75.
1340
Susp.Person/No Minn.
D.L. /False I.D.
Southdale
CBA
75007364
8/1/75
1351
PD Accident
69th & York
GOA
75007369
8/1/75
1435
Theft
Target
CONT
75007377
8/1/75
1821
Theft
Copper Marquee
CONT
75007397
8/2/75
1104
Med.Emerg /PI Acc.
Byerly's
0TH
75007399
8/2/75
1119
Car blocking
66th & France
A &A
75007403
8/2/75
1235
Fight /Assault /Damage
to Property
Target lot
CBA
75007405
8/2/75
1258
PI Accident
70th & France
0TH.
75007407
8/2/75_
1333
Theft from auto /Auto
Theft & Recovery
Kangaroo lot
CONT
75007403
8/2/.75
1404
Disorderly conduct
Dayton's
CBA .
75007410
8/2/75
1442
PI Accident
69th & France
0TH
75007413
8/2/75
1518
Shoplifting /Assault
Dayton's
EC
75007414
8/2/75
1518
Shoplifting
Penney's
UNF
75007418
8/2/75
1554
Shoplifting
Target
CBA
75007420
8/2/75
1802
Shoplifting /Poss.
Stolen Property
Bus stop
CBA
75007424
8/2/75
2101
Altered I.D.
York Liquor
A &A
75007453
8/3/75
0931
Theft
Cinema I &II &III
A &A
75007461
8/3/75
1537
Med.Emerg.Escort
66th & France
A &A
75007464
8/3/75
1727
Fire
Fairview Southdale
A &A.
7500',465
8/3/75
1732
Alarm
Radio Shack
A &A
75007469
8/3/75
2053
Strange noise
Walgreen's
A &A
75007477
8/4/75
0150
Rec.Stolen Auto
Southdale Med.Bldg.
ROA
75007!78
.8/4/75
0237
Found bicycle
7250 France
A &A
75007481
8/4/75
0530
Alarm
Henn.Cty.Lic,Center
A &A
75007482
8/4/75
0622
Found bicycle
Southdale Bowl
A &A
75007484
8/4/75
1210
Theft
226 S'dale Center
CONT
750074-88
8/4/75
1538
H &R PD Accident
Fox Lot
0TH
75007489
8/4/75
.1547
Theft
Fairview Southdale
CONT
75007490
8/4/75
1617
Auto Theft
Fairview Southdale
CONT
750u7491
8/4/75
1639
Theft
7240 York
CONT
75007'492
8/4/75
1b50.
Car fire
Alligator Lot
0TH
75007500
8/4/75
2201
Theft
Dayton's
CONT
75007524
8/5!75
1607
PI Accident
68th & York
0TH
15007527
8/5/75
1709
Shoplifting
Mary Adams
CBA
75007535
8/5/75
2244
Noises
Gabbert's Warehouse
A &A
7507542
8/6/75
1329
H &R PD Accident
6775 York
0TH
75007544
8/6/75
1454
Shoplifting
Dayton's
CBA
75007547
8/6/75
1032
Susp.person
Target
GOA /UTL
75007513
8/6/75
1901
Gun shot victim
Fairview Southdale
0TH
75007549
8/6/75
1901
Shoplifting
Dayton's
CBA
75007554
8/6/75
2045
H &R PD Accident
Red Owl Lot
A &A
750'07567
8/7/75
0052
Alarm
St.Paul Book & Stat.
A &A
75007604
8/3/75
0925
Abandoned vehicle
7220 York
A &A
Commercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
August 1 -31, 1975
C#
DATE
^LIME
INCIDENT
75007609
8/8/75
1247
H &R Accident
75007610
8/8/75
1259
PD Accident
75007612
8/8/75
1438
PD Accident
75007618
8/8/75
1739
Shoplifting
75007619
8/8/75
1851
Alarm
75007631
8/9/75
0155
Susp. person
75007636
8/9/75
0815
Burglary
75007637
8/9/75
0951
Domestic
75007639
8/9/75
1027
Open door
75007640
8/9/75
1052
Med.Emergency
75007644
8/9/75
1229
Found property
75007646
8/9/75
1350
PI Accident
75007650
8/9/75
1624
Shoplifting '
75007653
8/9/75
1810
Shoplifting
75007661
8/9/75
2203
Robbery Alarm
75007664
8/9/75
2227
Impound Auto
75007665
8/10/75
oo46
Assist Officer /Shooting
75007667
8/10/75
0248
Alarm
75007670
8/10/75
0515
Theft
75007671
8/10/75
0550
Alarm.
75007679
8/10/75
1513
Shoplifting
`'75007692
8/10/75
2215
Alarm
75007704
.8/11/75
0228
Alarm
75007708
8/11/75
0950
Listing Info.
75007710
8/11/75
1104
Med.Emergency
75007711
8/11/75
1118
Theft.
75007721
8/11/75
1627
Shoplifting
75007723
8/11/75
.16ho
Auto Theft
75007724
8/11/75
1640
PD Accident
75007727
8/11/75
1700
Lost Property
75007734
8/11/75
1957
Fire
75007737
8/12/75
0016
Kids' disturbing
75007742
8/12/75
0129
Poss.of Marijuana
75007744
8/12/75
0329
Alarm
75007755
8/12/75
1029
Miscellaneous
75007759
8/12/75
1308
PI Accident
75007761
8/12/75
1532
Poss.Stolen Property
7500776,°
8/12/75
1729
Theft
75007774
8/12/75
2059
A_tt.Auto Theft
75007778
8/12/75
2309
Possible Open Hydrant
75007738
8/13/75
0908
Alarm
75007809
8/13/75
1757
Shoplifting
75007814
8/13/75
2000
Forgery /Agg.Assault
75007815
8/13/75
2136
Alarm
75007819
8/13/75
2209
Alarm
75007826
8/14/75
0010
Alarm
7500781,6
8/14/75
1310
PD Accident
750073',-
8/14/75
1358
Auto Theft
75007049
8/14/75
1523
i'ed.Emergency
LOCATION
Tiger lot
70th & France
66th & France
Byerly's
7200 York
Zapata's
So. France Standard
S'dale Med.Bldg. #540
7200 France, #325
7151 York,Apt.719
Southdale
66th & York
Penney's
Dayton's
York Avenue liquor
Key Cadillac.
Key Cadillac
Target
Dayton's
Donaldson's Car Care
Penney's
7010 France
Freeman's Clothing
Byerly's
7151 York, #520
6800 France
Dayton's
Fairview S'dale Hosp.
70th & France
Target
Byerly's
7151 York
Zapata's
Donaldson's Car Care
7100 France
70th & France
S'dale to 60th &France
Target
Dayton's overflow
70th & York
3240 Southdale Circle
Donaldson's
Robertsons Pants
Pocket
Southdale Texaco
Gabberts
Wicke's Furniture
Elephant Lot
6800 France
S'dale Med.Center
Commercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
August 1 -31, 1975
Page 3
0
DATE
TI1�
INCIDFI
LOCATION
DISP.
75007851
8/14/75
1657
Concealing I..D.
Penney's
CBA
75007853
8/14/75
1856
Shoplifters (3)
Penney's
CBA
75007858
8/14/75
2001
Lost Property
Yorktown Pkg.Lot
A &A
75007867
8/15/75
0005
Bicycle part theft
Southdale
CONT
75007868
8/15/75
0008
Curfew
Southdale Bowl
CBA
75007886
8/15/75
1730
Theft
Wedding World
CONT
75007889
8/15/75
2010
Simple Assault
Southdale Ford
CONT
75007896
8/15/75
2355
P &C
McDonald's
CBA
75007916
8/16/75
1308
Vehicle lock out
7001 York
A &A
75007918
8/16/75
1411
Theft
Milton's
CONT
75007919
8/16/75
.1416
Bicycle Recovery
Byerly's
A &A
75007920
8/16/75
1552
Bicycle theft
Cinema I &II &III
CONT
75007924
8/16/75
1820
Susp.person
Southdale.
A &A
75007928
8/16/75
1844
PD Accident
Raccoon Lot
A &A
75007930
8/16/75
1929
Susp.person
Key Cadillac
GOA /UTL
75007936
8/16/75
2212
P&C
McDonald's
CBA
75001957
8/17/75
0315
Susp.Person
Penney's Lane
GOA /UTL
75007975
8/17%75
1405
PI Accident
66th &France
OTH
75007976
8/17/75
1419
PI Accident
70th & France
OTH
75007981
8/17/75
1717
Smoke smell
Panache
A &A
75007983
8/17/75
1927
Open door
Dayton's Garden Shop
A &A
75007989
8/17/75
2115
Assault
Cinema I &II &III
CONT
75007990
8/17/75
2213
Damage to Property
Southdale - Bowl
CONT
75007992
8/17/75
221:0
Alarm
Donaldson's
A &A
75o08o1L
8/18/75
1,445
H &R Accident
Tiger Lot
A &A
75008015
8/18/75
1448
Towed aban.vehicle
Gabbert's Lot
OTH,
75000024
8/18/75
1849
Theft from Auto
Southdale Lot
CONT
75008025
8/18/75
1931
Shoplifting
Target
CBA
75008027
8/18/75
2146
Fire alarm
Fairview Southdale
A &A
75008028
8/18/75
2148
Customer trouble
Southdale Bowl
'GOA /UTL
75008943
8/19/75
1023
PD Accident
66th & York M
OTH
75008045
8/19%75
1053
Found property
7000 York
OTH
75008047
8/19/75
1244
Theft
Southdale
CONT
75008048
8/19/75
1325
Theft
6700 France
CONT
75008051
8/19/75
1449
Locked vehicle
Camel lot
A &A
75008053
8/19/75
1553
Found property
Marc's Big Boy
OTH
75008060
8/19/75
1935
Theft
Southdale Ford
CONT
75008071
8/19/75
2336-
Car prowler
7151 York
GOA /UTL
75008072
8/19/75
2348
Noise
66th & Xerxes
A &A
75008083
8/20/75
0944
Theft
Southdale Ford
A &A
75008085
8/20/75
1321
Fire Alarm
Fairview Southdale
A &A
75008C86
8/20/75
1507
Shoplifting
Donaldson's
CBA
75008080
8/20/75
1721
Shoplifting
Red Owl
CBA
7.5008091
8/20/75
1857
PD Accident
67th & York
A &A
7500809':
8/20/75
2001
Shoplifting
Dayton's&Doraldson's
CBA
75008098
8/20/75
2236
Alarm
Donaldson's Car Care
A &A
75008 101
8/21/75
0020
Alarm
Goodman's Jewelry
A &A
75008 101.
8/21/75
0126
Alarm
Wheel Goods
A &A
75008109
8/21/75
1009
Roll back accident
Perimeter Road
OTH
i
Commercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
August 1 -31, 1975
Page 4
C.
DATE
TIPS
INCIDENT
LOCATION
DISP.
77oo8116
8/21/75
1253
Shoplifter
Penney's
CBA
75008117
8/21/75
1440
PD Accident
6600 France
A &A
75008119
8/21/75
1543
Theft by Check
Thayer- McNeil
CBA
75008120
8/21/75
1656
Shoplifting
The Limited
CBA
75008128
8/21/75
2127
Alamo
3555 W. 691th
A &A
75008134
8/21/75
2324
Damage to Property.
Yorktown Theater
A &A.
75008140
8/22/75
0328
Susp.person
Target
A &A
75008150
8/22/75
1109
Insuf.Funds /No.Acct.
J.Riggings
CONT
75008151
8/22/75
1230
PI Accident
66th & York
A &A
75008153
8/22/75
1245
Theft
3521 Hazelton
CONT
75008161 -
8/22/75
1625
PI Accident
Hazelton & York.
0TH
75008165
8/22/75
2047
Alarm
Donaldson Dock
UNF
75008170
8/22/75
.2252
Fire Alarm
6415 York
UNF
75008177
8/23/75
0039
Rape
S'dale Pkg.Lot
CONT
75008183
8/23/75
1324
Shoplifting
Dayton's -
CBA
75008189
.8/23/75
1333
PD Accident
69th & France
INA
75008195
8/23/75
1617
Shoplifting
Penney's
CBA
75008193
8/23/75
1730'
Shoplifting
Donaldson's
CBA
75008201
_
8/23/75
2008
Alarm
Southdale Texaco
A &A
75008208
8/23/75
2254
Theft
Black Swan Pub
CONT
75008210
8/23/75
2353
Poss.of Marijuana
McDonald's
CBA
:75008213
8/24/75
0506
Burglary /Theft
Titus Building
CONT
75008219
8/24/75
0535
Alarm
Goodman Jewelry
A &A
75008228
8/24/75
1L47
Shoplifting
Penney's
CBA
75008229
8/24/75
1543
Shoplifting
Dayton's
CBA
75008230
8/24/75
1610
H &R PD Accident
Turtle Lot
A &A .
75008239
8/24/75
2135
Auto Theft
Southdale Bowl
CONT
75008250
8/25/75
1045
Shoplifting
7000 York
CONT
77008252
.8/25/75
1124
Auto Theft
Southdale Ford
UNF
7500825'0
8/25/75
1320
PD Accident
McDonald's
A &A
75003260
8/25/75
1436
Poss.Stolen Property
Ca-el Lot
CBA
75008261
8/25/75
1433
Theft
Super Sams
CONT
75008263
8/25/15
1440
Alarm
226 Southdale
A &A .
75008269
8/25/75
1727
Damage to Property
Donaldson's Overflow
CONT
75008273
8/25/75
2046
PD Accident
Kangaroo Lot
A &A
75008274
8/25/75
2048
Shoplifting
Target
CBA
75008277
8/25/75
2121
Shoplifting
Penney's
CBA
75008282
8/25/75
2332
Susp.Circumstances
S'dale Water Tower
GOA /UTL
75008296
8/26/75
1003
Mini Bikes
York Ave. -YMCA
A &A
75008301
8/26/75
1238
Shoplifting
7000 York
CBA
75008307
8/26/75
1641
Theft
John W, Heller Co.
CONT
75008303
8/26/75
1641
Theft
J.W.Heller Co.
CONT
75008312
8/26/75
2128
Medical Emergency
7151 York
A &A
75008317
8/27/75
0034
Alarm
Byerly's Safe
A &A
75008325
8/27/75
0838
Alarm
3.501 Hazelton
A &A
75008326
8/27/75
0901
Theft
Gopher Lot
CONT
75008333
8/27/75
1132
Shoplifting
150 S'dale Center
CBA
75008340
8/27/75
1510
Shoplifting
Penney's
CBA
75008342
8/27/75
1540
PI Accident
Dayton's Station
0TH
75003345
8/27/75
1700
Lost property
S'dale Area
A &A
75008347
8/27/75
1852
Poss, of Marijuana
Turtle Lot
CBA
Commercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
August 1 -31, 1975
Page 5
C1#
DATE
TI14E
INCIDENT
LOCATION
DISP.
75008357
8/28/75
0305
Suspicious Noise
France & 66th
UTL
75008358
8/28/75
0417
Alarm
Audio King
A &A
75008372
8/28/75
1416
Aggravated Forgery
S'dale Natl.Bank.
CONT
75008373
8/28/75
1424
PI Accident
66th and Xerxes
A &A
75008375
8/28/75
1444
Shoplifting
7000 York
CBA
75008377
8/28/75
1503
Shoplifting
Byerly's
CBA
75008395
8/29/75
0900
P.D.Accident
6800 France
A &A
750G8399
8/29/75
1018
P.D.Accident
70th & France
A &A
750o8402
8/29/75
1152
Car Fire
Target Lot
UTL
75008404
8/29/75
1206
P.D.Accident
68th & France
0TH
75008405
8/29/75
1315
Shoplifting
Penney's
CBA
75008412
8/29/75
1905
Shoplifting
Target
CBA
75008420
8/29/75
2134
Auto Theft
Duck Lot
UNF
75008421
8/29/75
2148
Damage to Property
Cinema I &II &III
CONT
75oo8430
8/29/75
2345
Susp.Persons
Byerly's
A &A
75oo8450
8/30/75
1336
Shoplifting
Southdale
CBA
75oo8456
8/30/75
1619
Theft
7220 York
CONT
75oo8457
8/30/75
1631
Shoplifting
Donaldson's
CBA
750o8459
8/30/75
1710
Bicycle Theft
Southdale
0TH
75008460
8/30/75
1719
P.D.Accident
Owl Lot
A &A
75oo8462
8/30/75
2015
Public Assist
Schenazade
A &A
75oo8466
8/30/75
2206
Check Audible Alarm
Yorkdale Shops
GOA /UTL
75o08478
8/31/75
0112
Susp. Persons
Fairview S'dale
A &A
75008498
8/31/75
1200
Alarm
3505 West 69th
UNF
75008501
8/31/75
1331
Shoplifting
Dayton's
INA
75008505
8/31/75
1544
Recover Stolen Bike
Target
A &A
75008506
8/31/75
1620
Shoplifting
Donaldson's & Dayton's
CBA
75o08508
8/31/75
1816
Susp. Persons
Camel Lot
A &A',
75008510
8/31/75
2020
Susp. Persons
Southdale Ford
A &A
75007494
8/4/75
1951
Pidgeon Drop
Daytons
CONT
75007497
8/4/75
2107
PD Accident
Alligator Lot
OTH
DEFINITION OF DISPOSITIO =Y CODINGS:
ROA Referred to Other Agency
A &A Assisted and Advised
CONT Continued
GOA /UTL Gone on Arrival /Unable to Locate
UNF Unfounded
OTH Other
CBA Cleared by Arrest
EC Exceptional Clearance
INA Inactive
4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor, City Council, and City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: EQC Recommendation on Multiple Family Density
Reduction Plan
At its last meeting the Environmental Quality Commission
reviewed the proposed density reduction plan. The EOC
recommends that the City Council adopt the multiple family
density reduction plan as proposed.
GH:ln
10/3/75
L
y
�y
i 1_•1'
�L
C0`4YIFRIGAT ARE - PA'!'ROL I?iCIDET1: SiAIS' -iCS
September 1, 1915 - September 30, 197;
C ='
DATE
TIME
I:CID dT
LOCATION
DISP.
750Oc521
9/1%75
0013
Alarm
Byerly's
A &A,
750085 3
9/1/75
1622
PI Accident
Hazelton & France
0TH
00:53
9/1/75
2142
A`'L
Fairview- Southdale
A &A
75008560
9/2/75
0037
Noise
Perkins - 66th St.
A &A
1506::56-
9/2/75
0659
Alarm
lst S'dale National
A &A
7;00:.5 76
9/2/75
1250
PD Accident
Zapata's
0TH
7500:590
5/2,/75
1702
F'oind Dog
'Alligator Lot
GOA /UTL
75008591
9/2/75
1707
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
75003597
9/2/75
2057
Assist DK
Fairview Southdale
A &A
75008006,
9/3/75
0155
Open Door
Famous.Brand,Shoes
A &A
7500617
9/3/75
0920
Alarm
7001 York Avenue
A &A
75008626
9/3/75
1557
Damage to Property
Raccoon Lot
A &A
75008632
9/3/75
1928
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
75008635
.9/3/75
2102
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
75008639
9/3/75
2331
Theft
More Women
CONT
750086 "l
9/4/75
0131
Alarm
County Seat
UNF
7500061.3
9/4/75
0248
Damage to.Auto
Marc's Big Boy
CONT
750008,651
9/4/75
1051
Molesting Suspect
S'dale Med.Bldg.
GOA /UTL
71003652
9/4/75
1126
Shoplifter
Target
CBA
9/4/75
1326
Keys in Ignition
Gopher Lot
A &A
_.7100656
7500860
9/4/75
1443
Shoplifter
Target
CBA
75008'61
9/4/75
1528
PD Accident
Elephant Lot
A &A
7:008663
9/4/75
1531
Alarm
lst S'dale National
A &A
75O08668
9/4/75
1834
Forgery
DX Car Wash.
CBA
75000• -'72
9/4/75
2130
Shoplifter
Dayton's
CBA
75 -08377
9/5/75
0236
Noise
Perkins- 66th Street
GOA /UTL
71C,0C 0 -3
9/5/75
1455
Vehicle Lock Out
Target
A &A
75GDc380
9/5/75
1519
PD Accident
Mares Big Boy
A &A
7500' °3L89
9/5/75
1610
Theft /Simple Assault
Donaldson's
CBA
75000.392
9/5/75
1726
Theft from Auto
Fairview.Southdale
CONT
750LV 97
9/5/75
1816
Vehicle Lock Out
70th and France
A &A
750U889
9/5/75
1835
H &R PD Accident
Southdale Medical Bldg.
CONT
75008901
9/5/75
1910
PD Accident
Southdale Bank
A &A
7500 ;918
9/6/75
0206
Noise
Perkins - 66th Street
GOA /UTL
7506927
9/6/75
0936
Theft
1st Southdale National
CONT
75008,932
9/6/75
0951
PI Accident
66th and York
0TH
75008,34
9/6/75
1201
Indecent Exposure
Byerly's
CONT
756=93;
9/6/75
1226
PD Accident
70th and France
GOA /UTL
75GOE?33
9/6/75
1330
Shoplifter
Donaldsons'
CBA
?=C.
9/6/75
1819
PD Accident
666th and York
GOA /UTL
9/6/75
1842
PD Accident
Kangaroo Lot
A &A
=5oc ,,,';;
9/6/75
2013
`"'arrant
66th and Xerxes
CBA
750 C, :'J 55
9/6/75
2132
Suspicious Vehicle
York Liquor
A &A
7 ;Cr.J_95?
9/6/75
2149
Alarm
14 eel Goods
A &A
-- ,� --
9/6/75
2307
Suspicious Person
Southdale Bowl
GOA /UTL
SCr3 3 7 3
9/7/75
0252
PD Accident
70th Street
CONT
150aG 93
9/7/75
1750
Bicycle `_'h2 't
Gopher Lot
CONT
'S0' -95
9/7/75
1843
PD Accident
70th and France
A &A
5 o3993
1935
Al z=
Cedric's
A &A
* -^erci al area Patrol -
nci.4 -n-t Statistics
Se-_- I- 30, 1975
C
Dn9' E
TIME
INC! DINT
750 °D90r5
9/7/75
2150
Susp.Auto- Surveillance
75vO9�-2
9/8/75
1134
PD Accident
7500 -9016
9/8/75
1201
i7 eft
11 0-9 01 7-
50
9/8/75
1 208
No Pay Customer -
7510'l
9/8/75
1228
PD Accident
f 5C ^9' 33
9/9/75
0132
Water Pain Broke
;=0090 =2
9/9/75
0900
Cancel Stolen Auto
7 :Zo0go6O
9/9/75
2002
Shonlifter
7=01 9 o'2
9/9/75.
2120
Sho-o1 L.er
7;'09071
_ 9/10/75
1049
Locate Vehicle
75009074
9/10/75
1447
Forgery
750()908-
9/10/75
1937
Theft
75009086
9/10/75
2238
Vandalism
75009087
9/10/75
2307
Alarm
75009092
9/11/75
0049
Alarm
75009093
9/11/75
0212
Alarm
75009095
9/11/75
0450
Alarm
75009097
9/11/75
0708
Alarm
75009107
9/11/75
1500
Shoplifter
75009109
9/11/75
1558
Theft
7009114
9/11/75
1806
Damage to Property
7;009124
9/12/75
0143
Alarm
75CC9128
9/12/75
1005
Auto Theft
75009131
9/12/75
1134
Exposer
75009133
9/12/75
1317
Medical
75,009134
9/12/75
1358
Theft
.750,09143
9/12/75
1823
Shoplifter-.,
75009?46
9/12/75
1904
Alarm
75009148
9/12/75
2039
Shoplifter
7�00911=9
9/12/75
2143
Alarm
751009154
9/12/75
2341
Medical
75OCQ160
9/13/75
0157
Disorderly Conduct
75C001174
9/13/75
1239
Shoplifter
1500,0 77
9/13/75
1623
Lost Auto
7500917$
9/13/75
1628
PI Accident
75-009179
9/13/75
1631
Assist S'dale Security
75009180
9/13/75
1942
Theft /Susp.Person
00g1o9
9/14/75
0144
Pick up Dog- Impound
7500921'0
9/14/75
1401
Vehicle Lock Out
9/15/75
0703
Alarm
5L0`C233
9/15/75
0729
Damage to.Property
75rC9?37
9/15/75
0936
Suspicious Van
50092415
9/15/75
1252
Shoplifter
511 252
9/15/75
1634
Theft
750'9259
9/15/75
2112
Alarm
5:00—b7
9/16/75
0817
Damage to Property
506;27 3
9/16/75
1229
PD xccider_t
75�C9282
9/16/75
1746
Aggravated_ssault
,5:09284
9/16/75
1829
Tag & Tow- 3loctiing
;5009291
9/16/75
2304
Barking Dog
75009299
9/17/75
1020
Tr eft
Page 2
L0C_i T0N
Southdale Bowl Area
6969 France
lst Edina National Ba
Fas Gas
Rooster Lot
72nd and France
Southdale Ford
Daytons
Daytons
Water Tower Lot
Nina Boutique
Donaldson's
Marc's Big Boy
Byerly's
Sound of Music
Byerly's
Byerly's
Cedric's .
Byerly's
Dayton's
Galleria
Penney is
Alligator Lot
Giraffe Lot
Garden Court
Dayton's
Target
lst Southdale Nat.-'.l.
Donaldson's
Wheel Goods
7101 York
Perkins - 66th St..
Dayton's
Rooster Lot
70th & France
Raccoon Lot
Raccoon Lot
Alligator Lot
Alligator Lot
1st Southdale Nat'l
70th & France
Donaldson's Empl. -Lot
Target
Copper Marquee
Scandival Imports
lst Edina National
74th and York
Penney's Auto Center.
66th and Fork
Fairview S'dale Lot
Southdale Bowl
nk
DISP.
A &A
A &A
CONT
UNF
A &A
ROA
UNF
CBA
CBA
A &A
INA
CONT
CONT
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
A &A
CBA
CONT
CONT
A &A
UNF
CONT
A &A
CONT
CONT
CBA
A &A
A &A
CBA
CBA
A &A
0TH
GOA /UTL
CBA
0TH
A &A
A &A
CONT
A &A
CBA
CONT
A &A
CONT
A &A
CONT
0TH
A &A
CONT
Commercial Area Patrol
Incident Statistics
September 1 -30, 1975
C DATE
75009300
9/17/75
75009302
9/17/75
75009305
9/17/75
75009308
9/17/75
75009309
9/17/75
75009310
9/17/75
7500931'•4
9/17/75
75009322
9/18/75
" 750C9328
9/18/75
75009329 .
9/18/75
75009332
9/18/75
75009333
9/18/75
75009337
9/i8/75
75009340
9/18/75
75009341
9/i8/75
75009351
9/19/75
75009355
9/19/75
75009356
9/19/75
75009364
9/19/75
75009377
9/20/75
75009383
9/20/75
75009387
9/20/75
`75009389
9/20/75
75009391
9/20/75
75009394
9/20/75
75009398
9/20/75
75009399
9/20/75
75oo9402
9/20/75
75009403
9/20/75
75009412
9/20/75
75009420
9/21/75
75009426
9/21/75
75009429
9/21/75
75009+32
9/21/75
75009433
9/21/75
75009434
9/21/75
75009139
9/21/75
750.09451
9/22/75
75009453
9/22/75
75009455
9/22/75
75009'57
9/22/75
75009465
9/22/75
75009472
9/22/75
75009473
9 ✓22/75
75009477
9/22/75
75009479
9/23/75
75009'L-88
9/23/75
75C09489
9/23/15
75009490
9/23/75
7500949'3
9/23/75
75009500
9/23/75
75009502
9/23/75
TIP•' IiiCIDENT
1106
Alarm
1155
Vehicle Lock Out
1511
Shoplifter
1644
Shoplifter
1644
Shoplifter
1644
Defrauding Innkeeper
1812
Shoplifter
0247
Alarm
1148
Medical'
1349
Shoplifter
-1647 .
DW -L .
1737
Auto Theft
2006
Shoplifter
2214
Suspicious Persons
2355
Open Door
1430
Theft
1529
ATL- Runaway
1545
PD Accident
1833
Car Fire
0931
DOA ,
1110
Abandoned Bicycle
1314
PD Accident
1336
pI Accident
1451
PI Accident
1552
Lost Car
1806
Theft
1806
Theft
1833
H &R PD
1835
Alarm
2350
Damage to Property
0353
DWI
1149
Alarm
1300
Suspicious Activity
1619
Found Property
1635
Theft.
1640
Susp.Persons /Shoplifter
2111
Alarm
1024
Fire
1309
Theft
1403
Theft
1440
Shoplifter
1727
Shoplifter
2002
Threats
1910
=arm
2350
Alarm
•0039
Open Door
134'0
S hopli f t e r
1346
Vehicle Lock Out
15' =5
C:hoblil ter
1;28
_n_"orm?tional Report
2013
Shoplifter
2029
Alarm
Page 3
LOCAT DIN DISP .
7200 York
A &A
6'000 France
A &A
Dayton's
CBA
Penney's
CBA
Penney's
CBA
Penney's'
CBA
Penney's
CBA
Schmitt Music
A &A
6800 France
A &A
Dayton's
CBA
67th &. York
CBA
6750 France
UNF
Dayton's
CBA.
Alligator Lot
GOA /UTL
Pearle Vision Ctr.
A &A
7100 France
CONT
Walgreens
CBA
72nd & France
0TH
Kangaroo Lot
A &A
7151 York
INA .
Gabberts
0TH
69th & York
0TH
6805 York
0TH .
6805 York
0TH
Tiger Lot
A &A
Cinema::Lot '
CONT
Cinema Lot
CONT
York Liquor
0TH•.1
Buchkosky Jewelry
A &A
Southdale Bowl Lot
CONT
S'dale Med.Bldg.Lot
CBA
3239 Hazelton
A &A
Donaldson Lane
A &A
Raccoon Lot
0TH
Muggins Doll House
CONT
Penney's- Daytons
CBA
Polly Berg
A &A
6740 France
A &A
Southdale Ford
CONT.
Southdale Ford
CONT
Penney's
CBA
Hurrah Shop
CBA
Black Swan Pub
CONT
lst Fed,Savings & Loan
A &A
Buchkosky Jewelry
A &A
.Wedding World
A &A
Penney 'S
CBA
Camel Lot
A &A
Donaldson's -
CBA
Penney's
INA
Dayton's
CBA
Southdale Texaco
A &A
Co=e_rciall Area Patrol Page 4
a�4 cztics
1-30, 11075
OF DISPOSITION CODINGS-
1RO A
D A T
TIME
INCI-11 21�1
L, A 70 l
DISP.
0 A
0/24/75
0042
C.p.
en Door
35th & 'Hazelton
A&A
7 Z
Cleared by Arrest
1012
PD .1cci den
'.
6 750 ?r anc e
A&A
7 5=,09517
�9/2L/75
9/24/75
.1335
Auto Thelf U
6825 York
MIF
7
i-_10C�,520
9/2-1-1175
1526
Chalked Vehicle
6"16 xerxes
0
INA
7500, 5;
9/24/75
.1543
Shoplifter
Byerly's
CBA
9/24/75
2316
T-
heft
Southdale Bowl Lot
Souu
CONT
9/25/75
1258
Vehicle Lock Out
Camel Lot
A&A
7 8
9/25/75
1543
P'fblic nssist
Yorktown Fashion Mall
A&A
750'D5 5' =9
9/25/75
1546
Auto The-ft
Fairview Southdale
UNF
750095=58
9/25/75
2035
Fire Alarm
-Fairview Southdale
A&A
75009571.
9/206/75
0950
Th, e -ft
Holiday. Lane
'CONT
75009597
9/27/75
0008
H&?, PD Accident
McDonalds...
A&A
75009608
9/27175.
1120
Suspicious Person
York Liquor
A&A
75009314
9/27/75
1446
Shoplifter
Donaldson's
CBA
751009015
9/27/75
1556
Shoplifter
Now & Then
CBA
7:51ON-90620
9/27/75
1933
Possible Gun Shots
70th & France Area
GOA/UTL
75009624
9/27/75
2148
Alarm
Southdale Library
A&A
75,009630
9/27/75
2356
P&C
McDonalds
CBA
750090633
9/28/75
0118
Alarm
Target
A&A
035
9/28/75
0410
DWI
66th & France
CBA
75009638
9/28/75
0841
Alarm
Henn, County Library
A&A
7500960 ,
9/28/75
0907
Alarm
70th & France
A&A
5009 "48
9/28/75
1510
Medical
Byerly's
A&A
75009673
9/259/75
1720
H&R PD Accident
York Liquor
CONT
75C,00,677
9/29/75
1949
Possession of Marijuana
Raccoon Lot
CBA
75009"84
9/30/75
0514
Alarm
Donaldson's
INA
75009690
9/30/75
1518
Theft
6800 France
0TH
;500,b93,
9/30/75
1712
PD Accident
69th & France
OTH•
7:50009696;
9/30/75
1730
Shoplifter
Penney's
CBA
OF DISPOSITION CODINGS-
1RO A
Referred to Other Agency
Assisted and Advised
CCYI
Conti nued
0 A
Gone on Arrival/Unable to Locate.
UNIF
U n_7 o lan d e d
0171 H,
i 'ju h e I
C E
Cleared by Arrest
Exc.e-otional Clearance
L N
U_
Tnactive
RESOLUTION.APPROVING REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 5, BRAEMAR HILLS 7TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED .by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain Registered Land Survey, presented for approval by Gregory
Gustafson, covering Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 5, Braemar Hills 7th
Addition, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of October 20,
1975, be and is hereby granted preliminary and final approval.
ADOPTED this 20th4day of October, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and - acting City'Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October
20, 1975, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting..
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1975.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
LOTS 1-2. 3 AND 4. BLOCK 4. BRAEMAR HILLS 7TH..ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain Registered Land Survey, presented for approval by Gregory
Gustafson, covering Lots -1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 4, Braemar Hills 7th
Addition, and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of October 20,
1975, be and is hereby granted preliminary and final approval.
ADOPTED this 20th.day of October, 1975,
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting -of October
20,1975, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1975.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 3, BRAEMAR HILLS 7TH ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain Registered Land Survey, presented for approval by Gregory Gust-
afson, covering Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 3, Braemar.Hills 7th Addition, and
presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of October 20, 1975, be.and.is
hereby granted preliminary and final approval.
ADOPTED this 20th-day of October, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) - CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October.20, 1975,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. -
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1975.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION APPROVING REGISTERED LAND SURVEY
LOTS 1, 2, 3 AND 4, BLOCK 7, BRAEMAR HILLS 7TH ADDITION.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that
that certain Registered, Land Survey, presented for approval by Gregory
Gustafson, covering Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 7, Braemar Hills 7th Addition,
and presented at the Edina City Council Meeting of October 20, 1975, be and
is hereby granted preliminary and final approval.
ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
I, the undersigned duly appointed
Edina, do hereby certify that the
adopted by the Edina City _Council
and as recorded in the Minutes of
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
and acting City Clerk for the City of
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly
at its Regular Meeting of October 20, 1975,
said' Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of November, 1975.
City .Clerk
r .
FLOODPLAIN PER -MIT CONDITIONS
1. A grading permit must be obtained from the Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District.
2. Any fencing surrounding the pool must be of a fence
fabric having a mesh dimension of at least two inches
to allow water flowage.
3. All excavated material must be removed from the flood -
plain..
The owner, by his signature below, acknowledges that the
City of Edina is held harmless and is not responsible for
any damage which may occur as a result of the construction .
Owner
5
D to
16/3,)
i
CUB I
q
October 28, 1975
Mr. John Boland, Chairman
Metropolitan Council
Metro Square Building
St. Paul, M 55101
Dear ?fir. Boland:
Enclosed herewith -is a copy of the resolution adopted by.the Edina City
Council relative to the interchange at Trunk Highway 100 at Benton
.venue in the City of Edina.
Your efforts in. behalf of .this resolution will be greatly appreciated.
Yours very truly;
City Clerk
October'23, 1975
Mr. William Crawford
District -5 _ Engineer
Minnesota State Highway Department
2055 N: Lilac Drive
Golden Valley, KNI 55422
Dear Mr. Crawford.:
Enclosed herewith,is a copy of the resolution adopted by the Edina City
Council at its meeting of October 20, 1975, relative to the interchange
at T.H. 100 and Benton Avenue.
Your efforts in behalf of this resolution will be greatly appreciated.
Yours very truly,
City Clerk
T?FCr%T TTTTONT
WHEREAS, the section of T.H. 100 between W. 50th Street and the Cross-
town Highway has just been completed; and
WHEREAS, residents in the area are protesting vigorously the lack of
access on to T.H. 100 at Benton Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the design of this interchange hinders emergency vehicles in
their efforts to serve the public most expeditiously; and
WHEREAS, at the time of its approval, the Minnesota Highway Department
had recommended that a full diamond interchange be constructed at Benton
Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council refused to approve the plans as approved
by the Minnesota Highway Department and by the City of Edina for a full
diamond interchange, and instead, approved the limited access interchange
which has now been completed;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council urge the
Minnesota.Highway Department and the Metropolitan Council to consider the
revision of the Benton Avenue Interchange so as to permit Southbound
access on the West side of the highway and Northbound access to Benton
Avenue from T.H. 100.
ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1975.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina,do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution was
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of October
20, 1975, and as recorded in the minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said city this 29th day of October, 1975.
City Clerk
PETITION
��etition to the City of Edina, the Minnesota State Highway Department, the Metropolitan
lVow!icil,,- Members of the State Legislature and to the Governor:
:Ten ?lemen:
t•
Iidina, south access to Highway #100 at Benton Ave, has been cut off, ostensibly
because Benton is too close to the Crosstown. However, full access has been con-
structed (folded diamond). at 77th Street and Highway #100, which is about 400'
closer to I494_ This is grossly unfair ''to.residents near Benton!
Along the approximately 25 miles of the "Inner Belt Line" from the river at Ft. Snelling
to the river in Brooklyn Center, there will.be. about =2,9. accesses, into the neighborhoods,
or better than one per mile. With Benton denied south access to #100, there. will be a
2.'5 mile gap between 50th and 70th Street. This will 'be the longest gap between two -way'
neighborhood accesses on the entire "Inner Belt Line ", nearly'tw. ice as long as in the
nearly unpopulated area from 34th Ave. to Post Road. (See supplementary sheet,.- Item 1,
a specific list of points of access). This is grossly unfair:to residents near Benton!
In a time when we are .trying.to economize on our fuel usage, this denial of south
access at Benton, will compel hundreds of people in our area to drive nearly four.
extra miles every time they need to go south on #100. (See Supplement Item 2).
It will be more difficult for the Fire Department and the Police Department to get to
our area .in an emergency. In case of electric shock, drowning or heart attack, the
time_ ,for. a police car to go. two extra miles to render help could make the difference
between life ,and death. (See Supplement_ Item 3).
We respectfully petition the following:.
-The City of Edina to do all in its power to implement full Highway #100 access at Benton.
-The Highway Department to submit new plans for this access, meeting the minimum
Metropolitan Council standards, with necessary variances,. in the least costly manner.
-The Metropolitan Council, mindful of our needs, to speedily approve them.
-The Legislature to review the powers granted the Metropolitan Council, putting such
restraints on the power OfL the Council as to prevent such oversight of local needs
elsewhere in the future.
-The Governor, to be especially careful to appoint as Council members only those, who
will be mindful of, and responsive to,the needs of both majority and minority interests.
We further petition the Highway Department to immediately restore the exit that existed
on October 3, 1975, from.north -bound #100 to the east portion of Valley View Road. and
to install a similar temporary access from the west part of Valley View Road to south
bound #100 We understand that they will not meet your standards for permanent
but _ ^'_: that you maintain`it until the proper access is built_ We have. for
sometime now, patiently endured bypasses as substandard as this, and will endure this .
one until the .better one is completed. We. urgently need these..acces.ses during the months
it will take for the better one to be planned, approved and completed.
ADDRESS ISIGNATURE tSIGNATURE
PETITION SUPPLEMENT
This is a.;supplement to the. petition for' access from Benton to highway #100 south.
ITEM I: A specific list of pointsof access.
There apparently will be 6 interchanges that will not be useful accesses into the
nearby neighborhoods, because the intersecting highways will be without.acce.ss
to the neighborhoods for some distance. These are: (1) The proposed 494 eastward
extension to Mendota Heights. (2) Highway #36 (Cedar Ave.) (3) Interstate 35W.
(4) Henn. Cty. #62, Crosstown. (5) Minn. V. (6) The proposed I94 interchange
at West River Road.
Even after closing off some small intersections (as has been done in Edina), there will
apparently continue to be 29 two -way accesses from the neighborhoods to,the "Inner
Belt Line " - Highway 55 Normandale Highway 55
Airport Terminal 70th Cty. Rd. 66
Airport Post Road 50th 36th Av. N;
34th Ave Excelsior Blvd Highway 52
24th Ave. 36th St. 48th Ave. N
Portland /12th Ave. Lake St. Brooklyn Blvd
Nicollet 24th St. 57th Av.- N
Lyndale Cedar .Lake Rd Humboldt N.
Penn Highway 12 also 77th St. S.
France Glenwood Ave.
There are only two "half" accesses: Benton and 42nd Ave. N.
If this list should prove inaccurate due to the closing of a few of these listed,,
it still adds up to about one per :mile. The Crosstown is not 'valuable as a. neighbort-Wod
access as you have to drive a 'mile down the crosstown either way to .get off the cross -
town. The Valley View Exit off the crosstown is less than a mile_but since you cannot
turn north immediately, it is no better than going a mile to France Ave.
ITEM 2: Nearly four extra miles every time a Benton Area resident wants to go
South on #100 and return.-home.
Residents east of 100 at Benton will go 3/4 mile East to the Valley View.6ntrance
to the west -bound crosstown, then a mile to get up on #1.00 southbound. Coming home
they will go two extra miles: a mile .of highway driving to France and a mile extra thru
neighborhood streets. Total 3. 75 miles .waste each trip.
The trip home .can be reduced to one mile extra by leaving 100 at 70th and threading a
long roundabout path through 2. 5 miles of neighborhood streets via the Wyman Ave.
Bridge thence. to the Benton Bridge. The Metropolitan r" »ncil's denial of *h access
to #100 at Benton, ostensibly done to reduce traffic hazards, has not reduced traffic
hazzards, it has merely "swept them under the rug" by. moving them into someone
else's jurisdiction. Making the Highway a trifle safer, will make the neighborhood
streets more hazardous... and more than a trifle. The Metropolitan Council's
decision has actually increased the total hazard. This is not a wise decision!
ITEM -3: More difficult- for - quick- fire- and - police =arri
In a life- threatening emergency, it.is customary to dispatch the zone car PLUS one
or more cars from adjacent zones. If the zone car is at the far corner of the zone,
the car from the adjacent/
�n%e the first one to arrive (if access is not cut off as it
is now). Denial of the south access at Benton, may make this impossible at a critical
time, resulting in the tragedy of an unnecessary ,death.