HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986-12-01_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
DECEMBER 1, 1986
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
RESOLUTION - Relating to Southeast Edina Property (Continue meeting and discuss
with Council Agenda Item VII.B)
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of September 15 and October 6, 1986, and Special Meeting
of October 6, 1986, approved as submitted or corrected by motion of seconded by
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterisk ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to
close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been peitioned for; 4/5 vote required if
no petition.
A. Cascade Lane Improvement
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS.
A. Set Hearing Date (12/15/86)
* 1. Preliminary Plat - Starita lst Addition - Generally located west of
Blake Road and south of Waterman Avenue Extended
* 2. Preliminary Plat - White Oaks 8th Addition - Generally located
west of Townes Road and south of Sunnyside Road
* 3. Final Development Plan - Fairview Sou.thdale Hospital
* 4. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance - To Add Day Care to Office District
as a Principal Use
IV. -ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Waiver
of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass.
A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading)
* 1. Ordinance No. 171 -A26 - An Ordinance to Increase the Fee for Catering
Food Establishment
B. Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 451 -A5 - An Ordinance Establishing Standards for Signage
in the Mixed Development Zoning District, MD -3, MD -4 and.MD -5
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Sewer Lining (Continue to 12115186)
* B. -Gas Metering Replacement System
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Acquisition of OPTECH III -P Voting System
B. Hedberg Property
C. I -494 Corridor Study Report
* D. 1987 Holidays Schedule
Agenda
Edina City Council
December 1, 1986
Page Two
VIII. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Tax - forfeited Land - Lot 9, Normandale Terrace (PIN 30- 028 -24 -33 -0094)
IX. COMMUNICATIONS
* A. Set Hearing Date (115187) - Petition for Vacation of Street /Utility
Easement - Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition
*
X. SPECIAL BUSINESS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
A. Payment of claims as per pre -list dated 1211186: General Fund $197,944.28,
Art Center $1,617.91, Capital.Fund $5,350.00, Swimming Pool Fund $78.17,
Golf Course Fund $6,605.76, Recreation Center Fund $1,190.28, Gun Range
Fund $227.85, Utility Fund $204,313.41, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,260.64,
Construction Fund $6,921.75, XMP Bond Redemption #2 $860.00, Total
$428,370.05
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Dec 8 Council /Park Board Joint Meeting 7:00 p.m. Managers Conf Rm
Mon
Dec
15
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Dec
30
Year -End Council Meeting
5:00
p.m.
Manager's
Conf Rm
Mon
Jan
5
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Jan
12
Special
Council
Meeting - Mission Statement
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Jan
26
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
J
SOUTHEAST EDINA PROPERTY
LEGAL ANALYSIS
I. Tax Increment District
A. Needed to capture tax increment
B. Maybe useful whether or not property owned by HRA or
City
II. Existing Tax Increment District
A. Cannot be expanded
III. -New Tax Increment Districts
A. Three kinds: Redevelopment District
Housing District
Economic Development District
B. Redevelopment District
1. Duration: 25 years from first receipt of increment
2. Uses allowed: no restrictions
3. Applicable requirements for creation:
(a) at least 30% of parcels in district must be
unimproved
(b) at least 8.0% of the unimproved land must have
unusual terrain or soil deficiencies and must
have a value after incurring land preparation
costs.(limited essentially to filling, grad-
ing and soil correction) which is less than
the value at inclusion in the district plus
the cost of such land preparation
(c) HRA must have agreements for development of
at least 50% of the acreage having unusual
terrain or soil deficiencies
C. Housing District
1. Duration: 25 years from first receipt of increment
2. uses allowed: Housing project; rental or ownership
3. Requirements for creation:
(a) Housing project
(b) At least 20% of units must be for low and
moderate income persons
D. Economic Development District
1. Duration: 10 years from creation or 8 years from
first receipt of increment, whichever is less
2. Uses allowed: no restrictions
3. Requirements for creation: determination by HRA
of a public interest and benefit
4. Original assessed value is increased annually
based on average annual increases in assessed
value of the property for the five years preceding
creation of the District. This reduces the tax
increment
E. Time Limitation: Parcels must be removed from a
District if not improved within 4 years from certifi-
cation of District. Parcels are tax parcels in
existence at creation of District. Roads are improve-
ments.
IV. Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
A. Not now include all undeveloped property
B. Can amend to cover all of such property in Edina
1. Will allow pooling of tax increment from all
districts in Plan area to pay for redevelopment
activity in any district in Plan area
2. Necessary and desirable step prior to creation
of tax increment districts if such districts are
needed and if requirements can be met
V. Recommendations
A. Amend Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to include
all unimproved property in Edina
- HRA and City then are in a position to help develop-
ments when and if needed
B. Initiate studies to determine whether redevelopment
projects and redevelopment district or other tax
increment districts can be created
- Then HRA and City will be in position to decide if
and to what extent they can assist development of
the property
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland
Gordon Hughes
Craig Larson
FROM: Thomas S. Erickson and Jerome P. Gilligan
DATE: December 1, 1986
RE. Southeast Edina Property
You have advised us that the Hedberg property located
in the southeast portion of the City is reportedly for sale,
and have asked us to research the possibility of the use
of tax increment financing by the Edina HRA in the acquisition
and /or development of such land and adjoining undeveloped
land owned by DeCourcey. The land consists of approximately
95 contiguous acres, approximately 30 acres of which are
located in the existing Southeast Edina Tax Increment District
(the "Existing District ").
Existing District
The Existing District was created in 1977 and
terminates on August 1, 2009, or such earlier date on which
all bonds payable from tax increments derived from the Existing
District have been paid and any other public redevelopment
costs have been paid. Under the Minnesota Tax Increment
Financing Act (the "Act "), the Existing District may not
be expanded to include additional property.
Creation of New Tax Increment District
The HRA could adopt a redevelopment plan and tax
increment financing plan for the property outside the Existing
District and create one or more new tax increment financing
districts which include this property. The redevelopment
plan is adopted under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and
provides the HRA with the authority to acquire land, construct
public improvements and assist in the development of land
in the City. The tax increment financing plan creates the
tax increment district and provides a means for the HRA to
finance the expenditures being made pursuant to the redevelopment
plan. As an alternative for the HRA adopting a new redevelopment
plan for the development of the unimproved property, the
HRA could amend its existing Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Plan to cover the development of the unimproved property.
In establishing a tax increment financing district the HRA
and the City Council will need to hold public hearings and
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
make certain findings and determinations, including a
determination whether the district constitutes a redevelopment
district, housing district or economic development district
under the Act. The reasons and supporting facts for the
findings are to be set forth in writing. This determination
is to be made at the time of creation of the district. If
the tax increment financing district is. a redevelopment district
or housing district it will have a duration of up to 25 years
from the date of first receipt of tax increment. If the
tax increment financing district fails to qualify as a
redevelopment district or housing district it will constitute
an economic development district and have a duration of up
to 8 years from the date of receipt of the first tax increment
or 10 years, whichever is less. In addition, the original
assessed value (which is the base from which tax increments
are determined) for an economic development district is increased
each year by an amount equal to the original assessed value
for the preceding year multiplied by the average percentage
increase in the assessed valuation of all property included
on the economic development district during the 5 years prior
to the certification of the district by the County Auditor.
The original assessed value of.a tax increment district which
is a redevelopment district or housing district is not subject
to this increase. Therefore, if a new tax _increment financing
district . is to be created it is preferable that the district
qualify as a redevelopment district or housing district.
Requirements for Redevelopment District
While there are five tests for a tax increment
financing district to qualify as a redevelopment district,
there is only one under which the unimproved property could
possibly qualify. To qualify as a redevelopment district
under this test the following three conditions must be met:
1) at least 300 of the parcels to be included in district
are not occupied by buildings, streets or other
improvements; and
2) 800 of unimproved land must have unusual terrain
or soil deficiencies which require substantial filling
and grading or other physical preparation for use,
such that the fair market value of such land upon
inclusion in district, plus the costs of preparation
of such land for development (excluding road costs
and other public improvements) exceeds its fair
market value after completion of such preparation;
and
3) HRA must have entered into an agreement or agreements
for development of at least 50% of land having unusual
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A Pear SHIP INCL —INO PRO— SSIONAL CONPONw .—
-2-
terrain or soil deficiencies, which agreement provides
recourse for the HRA should the development not
be completed.
Requirements for Housing District
A housing district consists of a project (or a
portion of a project), intended for occupancy in part, by
persons or families of low and moderate income. In the past
we have interpreted "in part" to mean at least 200 of the
housing units in the project. Only the portions of the
unimproved property on which such type of housing is to be
located can constitute a housing district.
Requirements for Economic Development.District
An economic development district is a district
which does not meet the requirements for a housing district
or redevelopment district, but which the HRA finds to be
in the public interest because:
1) it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing
from moving their operations to another state; or
2) it will result in increased employment in the
municipality; or
3) it will result in preservation and enhancement of
the tax base of the municipality.
Because the definition of what constitutes an economic
development district is so broad, any tax increment financing
district that does not meet the requirements of a housing
or redevelopment district should qualify as an economic
development district.
Having the new tax increment financing district
qualify as a redevelopment district will provide the longest
duration and greatest flexibility to the HRA. If this is
not possible and there is to be constructed on all or part
of. the property, housing projects for low and moderate income
persons, the property on which such housing projects are
to be constructed can constitute one or more housing districts,
with the remainder of the unimproved property constituting
an economic development district.
Four Year Rule
Under the Act, if after four years from the date
of certification of the original assessed value of a tax
increment financing district no demolition, rehabilitation
or renovation of property or other site preparation, including
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A Pea .5xir P— ... -N.L C----
-3-
improvement of a street adjacent to a parcel but not installation
of utility service, has been commenced on a parcel located
within the tax increment financing district by the HRA or
the owner of the parcel in accordance with the tax increment
financing plan-, no additional tax increment may be taken
from that parcel and the original assessed value of that
parcel is excluded from the original assessed value of the
tax increment district. If subsequently such work is done
the parcel can then be reincluded in the tax increment financing
district but the .original assessed value of such parcel will
be equal to its most recent assessed valuation at the time
it is reincluded in the district. Under this provision "parcel"
means a tract or plat of land established prior to the
certification of the district as a single unit for purposes
of assessment.
Amendment of Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
If the HRA determines to assist in the development
of the unimproved property, it may,be advisable for the HRA
to amend its existing Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
to include that part of the property which is outside the
Existing District and within the City and create one or more
new tax increment districts which include the property outside
the Existing District and within the City. The HRA would
then have one overall Redevelopment Plan covering the area,
with separate tax increment districts. By using this method
the HRA is able to use tax increments outside the tax increment
financing district which generated the tax increments to
pay for redevelopment activities in the redevelopment plan
area. For instance, surplus tax increments derived from
the Existing District could then be used for projects undertaken
on the portion of the property which is outside the Existing
District but which is in the expanded Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Area.
Issuance of Bonds
a) Revenue Bonds and General Obligation Bonds.
In the past all tax increment bonds issued by the City have
been general obligation bonds. The City and the HRA are
also permitted to issue revenue bonds which are payable solely
from the tax increment and not backed by the full faith and
credit of the City. This is what was recently done by
Bloomington for the Mega -Mall project. If the bonds are
not general obligations of the City they will bear a higher
interest rate and may be more difficult to sell. The requirement
as to public sale will not apply to the revenue bonds and
the City or the HRA could negotiate the sale of the Bonds
with a bank or investment banker. If the City issues general
obligation bonds it will be necessary for the City to demonstrate
that at least 20% of the debt service on the bonds is reasonably
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A PAerr:cus 1—L..— PFOPCS —AL COtl1'OH -.1
-4-
expected to be paid from tax increments or special assessments
in order to issue the bonds without a referendum.
b) Tax - Exemption of Interest on Bonds. The new
tax bill generally subjects interest on newly issued tax
increment bonds to federal income taxation unless the facilities
to be financed with the proceeds of the bonds is public in
nature, such as a public parking ramp or public park. Bonds
issued to finance the purchase and /or improvement of land
which is intended to be sold to a private developer will
be subject to federal income taxation. However, since the
bonds are taxable, the restrictions under the federal income
tax code as to the amount of debt service on the bonds which
may be guaranteed by the private developer and arbitrage
will not apply to the bonds. Since the passage of the tax
bill a number of Minnesota municipalities (Plymouth, Inver
Grove Heights and St. James) have issued taxable tax increment
bonds. Generally the rate on the taxable bonds has been
about 1.5% above the tax - exempt rate.
Purchase Property of Prior to Amendment of Redevelopment
Plan
If the HRA needs to act quickly to purchase the
unimproved property, it is permitted to do so prior to the
approval of a redevelopment plan and creation of a tax increment
district if it determines that the acquisition is necessary
for the carrying out of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment
Plan. After acquiring the property the HRA can then approve
the redevelopment plan and create the tax increment financing
district for the unimproved property not in the Existing
District. The difficultly with proceeding in this manner
is that until creation of the new tax increment district
and the development of the property located therein the HRA
has no source of funds to pay for the purchase price other
than the tax increment from the Existing District all of
which is presently being used to pay the tax increment_ bonds
issued for the Edinborough project.
Possible Amendments to Tax Increment Financing Act
In the past two sessions of the Minnesota Legislature
various legislation has been introduced to amend the Act
to limit the availability to municipalities of tax increment
financing. It is likely that such legislation will again
be considered by the Legislature at its 1987 session.
Legislation previously enacted which limited tax increment
financing has been effective as of its date of enactment
and has grandfathered existing tax increment financing districts
from the new limitations. If the HRA and the City wish to
use tax increment financing to assist in the development
of the unimproved property any legislation introduced'at
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A Peerne .s INCLUU Pa— S- ... L Coro —l-
-5-
the 1987 session of the Minnesota Legislature relating to
tax increment financing should be closely monitored and the
HRA and City should be prepared to move quickly to approve
the redevelopment plan and create the tax increment district
if it appears.that legislation limiting tax increment financing
for the unimproved property will be enacted.
DOBSEY & WHITNEY
A P--...- P.- ...... - CO.--, -6-
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 15, 1986
Answering rollcall ere Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON NUMEROUS ASSESSMENTS. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered place on file. Due notice
having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as herein-
after recorded on the following proposed assessments:
1. STREET GRADING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143
Location: Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Addition
2. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -179
Location: Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Addition
3. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -373
Location: Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Addition
4. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT.NO. WM -358
Location:�.Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Addition
Improvements-listed under 1, 2, 3 and 4 above affecting the same properties,
public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis
of assessment for Street Grading Improvement No. C -143 showing total construction
cost of $7,085.75 proposed to be assessed against 5 assessable lots at $1,417.15
each, against estimated assessment of S1,701.64 per lot. Analysis of assessment
for Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S. -179 was given as total cost for construction
$4,882.50 proposed to be assessed against 5 assessable lots at $976.50 per lot,
against estimated assessment of $946.96 per lot. Analysis of assessment for
Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -373 was given as total construction cost of
$9,644.92 proposed to be assessed against 4 assessable lots at $2,411.23 per
lot, against estimated assessment of $3,453.17 per lot. Analysis of assessment
for Watermain Improvement No. WM -358 was given as total construction cost of
$10,305.12 proposed to be assessed against 4 assessable lots at $2,576.28 per
lot, against estimated assessment of $3,194.43 per lot. All assessments are to
be spread over 3 years per Developer's Agreement. No objections were heard and
no written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior hereto.
(Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
5. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -176
Location: McCauley Trail from Timber Ridge to Timber Trail; Timber Trail
from McCauley Train to Arrowhead Lake
6. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370
Location: McCauley Trail from Timber Ridge to Timber Trail; Timber Trail
from McCauley Trail to cul -de -sac
7. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355
Location: McCauley Trail from Timber Ridge to Timber Trail; Timber Trail
from McCauley Trail to cul -de -sac
Improvements listed under 5, 6 and 7 above affecting the same properties, public
hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis of
assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S -176 showing total construction
cost of $65,441.25 proposed to be assessed against 15 assessable lots at. $4,362.75
per lot, against estimated assessment of $3,550.85 per lot. Analysis of assess-
ment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -370 was given as total construction
cost of $70,784.12 proposed to be assessed against 22 assessable lots at
$3,217.46 per lot; against estimated assessment of $3,491.05 per lot. Analysis of
assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -355 was given as total construction
cost of $42,073.46 proposed to be assessed against 22 assessable lots at $1,912.43
per lot, against estimated assessment of $2,182.94 per lot. Assessments to -be
spread over 3 years per Developer's Agreement for Indian Hills 2nd Addition.
No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessments
were received prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
8. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -175
Location: Findell Clark Addition
9. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -369
Location: Findell Clark Addition
10. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -354
Location: Findell Clark Addition
Improvements listed under 8, 9 and 10 above affecting the same properties, public
hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis of
assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S -175 showing total construction
cost of $6,202.46 proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $563.86
per lot, against estimated assessment of $543.64 per lot. Analysis of assess-
ment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -369 was given as total construction
cost of $15,191.88 proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $1,381.08
per lot, against estimated assessment of $838.10 per lot. Analysis of assessment
for Watermain Improvement No. WM -354 was given as total construction cost of
$13,694.23 proposed to be assessed against 11 assessable lots at $1,244.93 per
9/15/86
lot, against estimated assessment of $1,103.82 per lot. Assessments are to
be spread over 3 years per Developer's Agreement. No objections were heard
and no written objections to the proposed assessments were received prior
hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
11. GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -144
Location: Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition
12. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S. -180
Location: Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition
13. SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -375
Location: Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition
14. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -360.
Location: Dearborn Court in Dearborn Addition and Blake Woods Addition
Improvements listed under 11, 12, 13 and 14 above affecting the same properties,
public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis
of assessment f6-r Grading and Graveling Improvement No..0 -144 showing total
construction cost of $12,771.70 proposed to be assessed against 10 assessable
lots at $1,277.17 per lot, against estimated assessment of $1,034.18 per lot.
Analysis of assessment for Storm Sewer Improvement No. St.S. -180 was given as
total construction cost of $15,869.30 proposed to be assessed against 10 assess-
able lots at $1,586.93 per lot, against estimated assessment of $1,867.01 per
lot. Analysis of assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -375 was
given as total construction cost of $18,933.20 proposed to be assessed against
10 assessable lots at $1,893.32 per lot, against estimated assessment of
$2,100.91 per lot. Analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement No. WM -360
was given as total costruction cost of $12,511.72 proposed to be assessed
against 9 assessable lots at $1,411.97 per-lot, against estimated assessment
of $1,411.67 per lot. Assessments are to be spread over 3 years per Developer's
Agreement. No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed
assessments were received prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution
later in Minutes.)
15. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -86
Location: 50th Street and France Avenue Business District
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Maintenance Improvement
No. M -86 showing total construction cost of $44,944.18 proposed to be assessed
against 289,030 assessable square feet at $1.15555 per assessable square foot
to be spread over one year. Engineer Hoffman explained that the annual
maintenance cost for the 50th and France Business District is up this year
due to concrete repair on sidewalks and additional cost for trees and plantings.
No objections were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment
were received prior hereto. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
16. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353
Location: Westwood Court
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Watermain Improvement
No. WM -353 showing total construction cost of $59,240.40 proposed to be assessed
against 12 assessable lots at $4,936.70 per lot, against estimated assessment of
$5,617.95 per lot.. Assessment is to be spread over 10 years. No objections
were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were received
prior hereto. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
17. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33
Location: West 492 Street - Adjacent to Peterson Building (East of ramp)
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Sidewalk Improvement
No. 5 -33 showing total construction cost of $9,412.70 proposed to be assessed
against one assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $5,630.58 per lot.
The assessment -is to be spread over 10 years. Engineer Hoffman explained that
when the Peterson building was remodeled the City was petitioned to remove
the parking bay on West 492 Street adjacent to the building and to construct
A sidewalk in that location. Bids were taken and came in higher than the
estimated cost. He stated that two issues have come up during the process:
1) that more of the cost should be assessed back to the 50th Street and France
Business District as also being a user of the-sidewalk rather than one property
owner paying the entire cost, and 2) that the assessment hearing be continued
to October 6, 1986 so that the issue could be discussed with Oswald Peterson.
Motion of Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Turner to continue the hearing
to October 6.. Motion carried.
18. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -34
Location: Country Club District, Brown and Fairway Sections
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Sidewalk Improvement
No. S -33 showing total construction cost of $181,997.30 proposed to be assessed
against 566 assessable lots at $321.55 per lot, against estimated assessment of
$190.00 per lot. Assessment to be spread over 5 years. Engineer Hoffman
explained that the hearing for this improvement was held last year and that
historically the City has replaced sidewalk in need of repair in the Country
Club District every six to eight years. The estimated cost at the project
hearing was $190.00 per assessable lot and the difference between the estimated
9/15/86
assessment and the proposed assessment of $321.55 per lot is that when the work
was commenced a number of property owners asked that additional.sections of
sidewalk be replaced than was initially scheduled for replacement and therefore
the total cost reflects the additional work requested. Mr. Hoffman said that he
has received 7 telephone calls from property owners who received notice of the
assessment asking why they were being assessed as not much work was done on
their frontage and that he had .explained that the policy since 1973 in the Country
Club District has been to replace broken sidewalk and to assess all properties
equally. Paul Laederach, 4633 Bruce Avenue, questioned the difference between
the estimated and proposed assessment. Noted were letters from John-and Susan
Palombo, 4624 Browndale Avenue, and Douglas H. McPeak, 4627 Drexel Avenue,
objecting to the assessment. No further comments were heard. (Assessment
levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
19. GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -142
Location: Edinborough Addition
20. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -177
Location':. Edinborough Addition
21. SANITARY'SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -371
Location: Edinborough Addition
22. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -356
Location: Edinborough Addition
Improvements listed under 19, 20, 21 and 22 above affecting the same properties,
public hearing was conducted concurrently. Manager Rosland presented analysis
of assessment for Grading and Graveling Improvement.No. C -142 showing total
construction cost of $106,704.81 proposed to be assessed against 1,028,976 square
feet at $0.1037 per square foot. Analysis of assessment for Storm Sewer Improve-
ment No. St.S -177 was given as total cost of construction of $216,084.96 proposed
to be assessed against 1,028,976 square feet at $0.2100 per square foot. Analysis
of assessment for Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. SS -371 was given as total cost
of construction of $19,556.78 proposed to be assessed against 1,028,976 square
feet at $0.0190 per square foot. Analysis of assessment for Watermain Improve-
ment No. WM -356 was given as total cost of construction of $123,580.02 proposed
to be assessed against 1,028,976 square feet at $0.1201 per square foot. All
assessments are to be spread over 10 years per Developer's Agreement. No object-
ions were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessments were
received prior hereto. (Assessments levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
23. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262
Location: West 44th Street from Brookside Terrace to Highway 100
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Street Improvement No.
BA -262 showing total construction cost of $17,310.00 proposed to be assessed
against 865.50 assessable feet at $20.00 per foot, against estimated assessment
of $20.00 per foot. Assessment is to be spread over 10 years. Engineer Hoffman
explained that State Aid funds paid for the majority of the cost of construction
of the project. No objections were heard and no written objections to the
proposed assessment were received prior hereto. (Assessment levied by Resolution
later in Minutes.)
24. TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -86
Location: Area #5 and #6." Bounded by,Highway 100 on the east, Crosstown
Highway on the south, County Road 18 on the west and City of Edina limits on
the north.
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Tree Trimming Improvement
No. TT -86 showing total cost of $41,730.00 proposed to be assessed as follows:
95 trees 12" and under at $30 each and 864 trees over 1" at $45 each, against
estimated assessment of $45 per tree to be spread over one year. Park Director
Kojetin commented that approximately 50 telephone calls have been received which
have been answered and which pertained to trees which after the trimming
developed Dutch Elm disease and which were then removed. Jane Stenson,
4811 Bywood West, commented that she felt the trimming was excessive and was
a factor in the subsequent loss of trees. She also questioned the procedure
followed in removing diseased trees and asked if the City will re- forest.
Elizabeth Skelly, 4425 North Avenue, asked who makes the decision regarding
which _trees and when to trim them. Byron Armstrong, 4119 West 62nd Street,
complained that there was a lack of communication with the homeowner when the
trees were trimmed in his area and that the trimming destroyed the natural
shape of the trees. Duncan Burns, 4523 Arden Avenue, asked that the City
publish information in the Edina Sun - Current as to which types of trees are
allowed to be planted. He also questioned the frequency of inspection of trees
for Dutch Elm disease. Mr. Kojetin responded that the forester in traveling
through the city is constantly looking for signs of diseased trees; that this
year the City is losing trees fast and that some large elms especially in the
Country Club District which have been treated for years are suddenly dying.
No further comment was heard. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
25. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -86
Location: Various locations of diseased trees within the City of Edina
9/15/86
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Tree Removal Improvement
No. TR -86 showing total cost of $7,520.00 proposed to be assessed against
13 assessable lots allocated individually per size of tree removed. No object-
ions were heard and no written objections to the proposed assessment were
received prior hereto. (Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
26. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -86
Location: Indianhead Lake and Mill Pond
Manager Rosland presented analysis of assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement
No. AQ -86 for Indianhead Lake showing total cost of $10,396.00 proposed to be
assessed against 33 homes at $315.00 per home and for the Mill Pond showing
total cost of $7,588.00 proposed to be assessed against 63 homes at $120.45
per home. Assessment to be spread over 3 years. No objections were heard and
no written objections to the proposed assessment were received prior hereto.
(Assessment levied by Resolution later in Minutes.)
Following the presentation of analysis of assessments, Member Bredesen introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON ACCOUNT OF
VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has given notice of hearings as required by law on the proposed
assessment rolls for the improvements hereinafter referred to, and at such
hearings held on September 15, 1986, has considered all oral and written
objections presented against the levy of such assessments.
2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the
office of the City Clerk for the following improvements:
Street Grading Improvement Nos. C -142, C -143, C -144
Storm Sewer Improvement Nos. St.S -175, St.S -176, St.S -177, St.S -179, St.S -180
Sanitary Sewer Improvement Nos. SS -369, SS -370, SS -371, SS -373, SS -375
Watermain Improvement Nos. WM- 353, WM -354, WM- 355,,WM -356, WM -358, WM -360
Maintenance Improvement No. M -86
Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -34.
Blacktop, Curb & Gutter Street Improvement No. BA -262
Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -86
Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -86
Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -86
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvements upon the lot,
tract or parcel of land so assessed, and all of said assessments are hereby
adopted and confirmed as the proper assessments on account of said respective
improvements to be spread against the benefited lots, parcels and tracts of land
described therein.
3. The assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of
said installments, together with interest at a rate of 8.9% per annum on the
entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1987, to be payable with
the general taxes for the year 1978. To each subsequent installment shall be
added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments.
The number of such annual installments shall be as follows:
Name of Improvement Number of Installments
.GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -143 3 years
6T'ORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. -ST.S -179 3 years
SANITARY SEWER.IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -373 3 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -358 3 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -176 3 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -370 3 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -355. 3 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -175 3 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -369 3 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -354 3 years
GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -144 3 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -180 3 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -375 3 years
WATERMAIN. IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -360 3 years
MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -86 1 year
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -353 10 years
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -34 5 years
GRADING AND GRAVELING IMPROVEMENT NO. C -142 10 years
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. ST.S -177 10 years
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -371 10 years
WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -356 10 years
STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -262 10 years
TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -86 1 year
TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -86 5 years
(Exception: Levy No. 10353 - 1 year)
AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO. AQ -86 1 year
9/15/86
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor
a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with
each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended
on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may
be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any
right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4,
and if any such assessment is not paid in a single installment, the City
Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth
in said Section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR ZONING CHANGE FROM R -1 TO PRD -2 (ROBERT HANSEN) HEARD; FINDINGS TO
BE PREPARED FOR DECISION. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen advised that the subject property
is generally located north of the Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon
Court. The request for a zoning change from R -1 to PRD -2 was heard by the Council
on May 19, 1986, at which time 16 townhouse units divided amoung four buildings
was proposed for the site. That proposal was referred back to the Community
Development and Planning Commission to look at the number of units and setbacks
on the site. The proposal was heard by the Planning Commission several times,
most recently on September 3, 1986, when the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the revised plan illustrating 15 townhouse units and conforming to
the setback requirements of the PRD -2 Planned Residence District, a front setback
of 30 feet and a rear setback of 35 feet. The Planning Commission's approval was
conditioned on: 1) an acceptable overall development plan, 2) final platting and
3) subdivision dedication. Mary Murphy, President of Viking Hills Homeowners
Association, asked questions about the distance from the building to the cul -de -sac,
the height of the retaining wall, the distance between buildings and said they
were concerned about protecting the natural habitat of the hill at the rear of
the proposed development and also about the increased traffic on Vernon Avenue.
Member Richards commented that he supported the PRD -2 zoning concept but that he
felt it should not be developed to the maximum density and that 12 units would
make more sense in light of the commitment everyone has made in that area to
preserve the hill. Member Kelly said she concurred with Member Richard's comments
regarding density for the proposal. Member Turner asked what the density was for
the various multi -unit developments directly southwesterly and northerly of the
subject site. Mr. Larsen responded that they were all in the same density range
as was proposed for subject site. Member Turner commented that the revised plan
now meets the requirements of the PRD -2 District and that she would favor approval.
In response to Mayor Courtney's questions as to-procedure, Attorney Erickson said
the Council cannot use the neighborhood objections to the proposal as the sole
reason to deny the rezoning request. If denied, the rezoning request cannot be
brought back to the Council for one year unless there is a change in facts. He
pointed out that if a developer meets the criteria set out in the Zoning
Ordinance for development of land then he is entitled to develop the property.
The real question is on what basis can the Council say the density has to be
something less than 15 units. Mr. Erickson pointed out that the procedure has
been to direct staff to prepare findings of fact and reasons for the Council to
consider in making their decision. Robert Hansen, the proponent, spoke in support
of his revised plan for the site and pointed out the amenities of the units. He
stated that he felt the proposed 15 units would not add noticably to the traffic
on Vernon Avenue. David Darrell, architect for the project, presented a graphic
showing the slope of the hill and pointed out that the retaining wall would be
5 feet at the highest point, sloping lower where -the hill contours are lower.
Bill Pearson, Vernon Avenue, spoke in favor of the proposed development. Member
Kelly made a motion to again refer the rezoning request to the Planning Commission
for consideration of the commitment the neighborhood has made to the hill, the
topography of the site, the advisability of reducing the density and the traffic
concerns on Vernon Avenue. Motion.was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards
Nays: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Member Turner then made a motion to approve the zoning change from R -1 to PRD -2
District, subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. Motion
was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly, Richards
Motion failed because 4/5 favorable vote is required for zoning change. Attorney
Erickson opined that only the winning party (nays vote) can bring the matter back.
Mr. Erickson then explained that legally the zoning change was denied and the
9/15/86
courts have ruled that if a proposal is denied the reasons must be stated
for that action. Member Richards then made a motion to retract the first
motion and to direct the staff to prepare findings of fact for a decision
which would include: l) the transitional zone 2) the proximity to the single
family residential neighborhood, 3) the type of developments immediately to
the east and northeast, 4) the hill in public ownership, encroachment thereof
and preservation of that open space, and 5) the traffic the development would
add. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney:
Motion carried. .
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -Al2 GRANTED FIRST READING (R -1 TO R -2 DISTRICT FOR ROBERT
KIDD); PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR KIDD ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised that
the subject property is generally located South of West 62nd Street and east
of Valley View Road and is a through lot with frontage on both streets. The
property measures approximately 83 feet in width by 339 feet in depth and contains
28,253 square feet of area. It is presently developed with a single family
dwelling unit fronting on West West 62nd Street, the remainder of the property
being undeveloped. The proponent is requesting approval of a subdivision which
would create a new lot with frontage on Valley View Road and would contain
15,005 square feet, while the lot for the existing dwelling would contain
13,248 square feet. The proponent is also requesting that the new lot be rezoned
R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to allow the construction of a new double .
bungalow. The new lot would meet the square footage requirement for an R -2 lot
but would require a variance from the 90 foot lot width requirement. The Com-
prehensive Plan illustrates this section of Valley View Road as suitable for low
density attached residential. Existing buildings in the vicinity contain
between 2 and 5 units. The preliminary plat illustrates a location for the new
double bungalow. Due to the alignment of Valley View Road a front setback
variance would be necessary. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the proposal is similar
to one heard by the Council in 1984; the major difference is that the lot on
Valley View Road has been increased to meet the 15,000 square foot requirement.
Unlike the previous proposal which was to have both lots zoned R -1 District the
new lot is proposed to be rezoned to the R -2 District. In 1984 staff suggested
that the subject property be combined with two similar parcels adjacent to and
east of the property. The proponent and other local developers have attempted
to acquire all three properties for a larger development. All efforts have
apparently failed. Staff has become convinced that the favored combined deve-
lopment will not occur in the foreseeable future. Consequently, staff sees this
request as a reasonable alternative that would be compatible with surrounding
properties. The subject proposal was heard by the Community Development and
Planning Commission at its meeting of September 3, 1986, and recommended pre-
liminary rezoning and plat approval, subject to final plat approval and sub -
division dedication. Reasons stated in support of the variance from the 90 foot
lot width requirement were: 1) City and staff support of the R -2 District zoning
in the past, and 2) 82 and 83 foot lots are standard widths for R -2 lots on
Valley View Road. Robert Kidd, proponent, commented that two years ago staff
recommended that the subject property be tied together with other adjacent lots.
However, this did not happen and therefore.he is requesting that the new lot be
rezoned R -2 District. Dr. Byron Armstrong, 4119 West 62nd Street, stated his
objection to the proposed development and that of the neighborhood. No further
comment being heard, Member Bredesen introduced Ordinance No. 825 -Al2 for First
Reading as.follows; subject to final plat approval and subdivision dedication:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -Al2
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
The south 180 feet of the following described parcel:
Lot 3, except the East 95 feet, front and rear thereof, and Lot 20,
except the West 75 feet thereof, all in Block 2, Peacedale Acres."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
Motion for First Reading of the Ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
First Reading granted.
Member Bredesen then introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
9/15/86
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR KIDD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Kidd Addition ", platted by Robert J. Kidd, and presented
at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 15, 1986, be and is
hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PID PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT TO PRD -4 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT ZONING
REQUEST REFERRED TO STAFF FOR REFINEMENT OF PROJECT PROPOSED BY KNUTSON VENTURES.
Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen advised that the subject property is located south of Eden Avenue and west
of the Soo Line Railroad track and is located within the Grandview Area Tax
Increment District. The properties involved include the Lewis Engineering site,
the Kunz Oil warehouse, and the Soo Line Railroad property which is currently
vacant. The total area of the site is approximately 6.8 acres. The Grandview
Area Tax Increment Plan identifies the subject area as blighted and recommends
that the current uses be removed and that the area be redeveloped. The Plan did
not, however, suggest the most appropriate land use for redevelopment. The Edina
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) commissioned BRW to conduct a land use
study and make recommendations for the entire district. With respect to the
subject parcel, the study recommended high density residential as the most appro-
priate use and suggested a redevelopment with between 140 and 210 dwelling units.
Mr. Larsen .stated that Knutson Ventures has submitted a request to rezone the
property PRD -4 to allow construction of a 4- story, 210 unit apartment complex.
The complex would include 263 underbuilding parking spaces and 157 surface spaces.
The proposed parking is in conformance with Ordinance requirements. The formal or
guest entrance to the project is located off of Eden Avenue with tenant entrances
to underbuilding parking proposed off of Eden Circle. A substantial effort will
be made to screen the perimeter of the site, especially along the east and north
sides. The proponents have proposed that the HRA acquire the property and make
it available to them for redevelopment. Due to the high cost of acquisition and
clearance a request for some form of assistance or write -down is anticipated.
Staff believes that the proposed redevelopment concent complies with BRW's recom-
mendations on land use. The proposal.would also remove the blighting influences
referenced in the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan. Mr. Larsen pointed out that
the key to the redevelopment is the willingness of the HRA to participate in the
acquisition and redevelopment. The proposal was heard by the Community Develop-
ment and Planning Commission at its meeting of September 3, 1986. The Commission
members agreed that the property should be redeveloped, that redevelopment for
housing was appropriate and recommended concept approval. The Commission members
did not express an opinion with respect to the proposed financing of this project
and HRA participation. William Schatzlein, Knutson Development Company, stated
that the project would be developed for Knutson Company to own and operate and
that he had met with Peter Jarvis of BRW to discuss the site. They had agreed
that housing would be the best use for the property and that this would be an
excellent multi - family housing site with access to a major highway. They felt
there is a need for additional rental housing in Edina for those residents who
want to say in the City but do not want home ownership. Mr. Schatzlein presented
graphics of the proposed- development, pointing out the proposed siting of the
building which would create its own neighborhood and the amenities of each level
of the four story building. If the Council gives concept approval of the project,
Mr. Schatzlein said Knutson Development would then work with staff to see how
the HRA could participate to make the project work. Sara Laird, Eden Avenue,
expressed a concern about the additional traffic that would be generated by the
project. Member Richards commented that it would be premature to judge if the
HRA should be involved; that he would urge the developer to meet with the neighbors
to the south and west to explain the project and get their viewpoints on it; that
he would hope the project would not be done on a piecemeal basis and that he had
a positive reaction to what is proposed. Member Kelly said she was concerned
about the density of the entire area involving development in proximity to Vernon
Avenue; that the character of the neighborhood will be changed and that the impact
of each project should.be seen before commiting to another. Member Turner commented
that she agreed with the land use and the multi- family housing concept but was
reluctant about financial participation by the City and did not see the rationale
or goals for City participation. Mayor Courtney stated he also was hesitant about
City participation in the project and that the Council would need to have more
details. Member Bredesen made a motion to -send the matter to back to staff for
further work with the Knutson Company on details of'the proposed project. Motion
was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
9/15/86
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL NOT GRANTED FOR DAHLE REPLAT OF WARDEN ACRES. .Affi-
davits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen stated that the subject property is generally located south of Grove
Street and west of Garden Avenue. He recalled that a similar subdivision pro-
posal was considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission and
the Council recently. The proposal, to create one new buildable lot and one
outlot, failed to gain Council approval at their May 19, 1986 meeting. That
proposal called for retaining and remodeling the existing dwelling. Tory. Dahle,
the proponent, has now re- applied for preliminary plat approval. This new
proposal suggests that the existing dwelling be razed and that two new-dwell-
ings be constructed fronting on Grove Street. The southerly one -half of the
property would be designated as a single outlot, and the right of way for Oak
Lane would be dedicated. As in the previous request the two lots fronting on
Grove Street would be 72.8 feet wide. The only change from the previous pro-
posal is the suggested removal of the existing dwelling. This would eliminate
the need for the driveway encroachment and the detached, rear yard garage.
Mr. Larsen recalled that at the last hearing before the Council there was some
discussion not only of the typical size lots in the neighborhood but also how
large the potential lots on the new street of Oak Lane would or could be. If
the entire south frontage of the extension of Oak Lane is replatted at one time
it would be possible to plat eight conforming 75 foot lots. On the north street
frontage, with.a combination of properties, it would be possible to create three
75 foot lots and one 80 foot lot. With regard to the subject property, there
is no possibility of gaining more width, consequently, the proposal is for two
lots each 72.8 feet wide. The Planning Commission heard the new proposal at
its meeting of September 3, 1986 and recommended denial on a 5 to 4 vote. Tory
Dahle, proponent, spoke in support of the proposal stating that though the new
lots did not meet the required 75 foot width they did meet the square footage
required by ordinance. He said he felt the new lots would not be out of nature
with the neighborhood and that he now proposed to raze the existing home because
he felt the neighbors objected to it being remodeled and retained. Speaking
in opposition to the proposed plat were Dan Hergot, 5804 Garden Avenue; Greg
Tripp, 5809 Garden Avenue; Richard Andron, 5808 Garden Avenue; Jim Breitenbucher,
5424 Grove Street; Robert Ryder, 5509 Grove Street; Steve Mundy, 5500 Grove Street
and Brian Kise, 5504 Grove Street. Speaking in support of the proposed plat
were Robert Buroker, 5516 Benton Avenue; Ernie Hallgren, 5809 Johnson Drive;
Corky Weber, 4303 Country Club Road and an unidentified woman living at 5500
Benton Avenue. There being no further public comment, Member Bredesen said he
had heard no reason to not support the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Member Bredesen then made a motion to uphold the recommendation and to deny
preliminary plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (RETAIL USES) APPROVED FOR EDINBOROUGH. Affidavits of
Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
advised that the subject property is generally located south of West 76th Street
and west of York Avenue. The Edinborough development is zoned MD -5 Mixed
Development District. The Mixed Development District permits accessory retail
uses, but only by Conditional Use Permit. The Ordinance specifies that most
of the uses permitted in the PC -1 and PC -2 Districts shall be allowed following
issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. The intent of the Permit is to define
and control the areas within the development where retail uses will be permitted
and to insure that retail uses are accessory to the principal uses in the deve-
lopment. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the Zoning Ordinance established special
standards for conditional uses in the MDD and those uses must: a) be contained
in a principal building, except for drive - through facilities; b) provide goods
and services beneficial to the needs of the occupants and residents of the
principal uses and surrounding properties, and c) have enclosed pedestrian access
to the principal use. The proposed retail uses are to be located on the first
floor of the office building. The first floor area devoted to retail use would
be approximately 14,700 square feet, will be completely contained within prin-
cipal use buildings and will have direct access to the indoor park. Mr. Larsen
explained that staff had recommended to the Planning Commission that certain
uses permitted in the PC -1 and PC -2 District be excluded from the MDD for Edin-
borough to insure that retail uses would be accessory only and not become prin-
cipal uses. Upon discussion, the Planning Commission was of the opinion that
the market should control the individual retail uses ,and not the staff. The
Planning Commission recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit as pro-
vided in the Zoning Ordinance with retail uses limited to the first floor of the
office building. Member Richards asked for the opinion of the developers with
regard to the staff's recommended excluded uses.. Bob Deesen, representing
Winfield Development, said they were comfortable with staff's recommendation.
Member Kelly made a motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Edinbor-
ough with staff approval of individual uses. Motion failed for lack of second.
9/15/86
Member Richards then made a motion for approval of the Conditional Use Permit_
and introduced the following resolution, moving its adoption:
.RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance
No. 825 have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a
Conditional Use Permit for retail uses in Edinborough.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.APPROVED FOR AMCON CORPORATION. Affidavits of Notice
were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised
that the subject'property is generally located west of Parklawn Avenue and
north of West 77th Street extended, is zoned PID Planned Industrial District
and is developed with an office- warehouse building containing approximately
20,000 square feet. The proponents are requesting approval of a -plan to add
approximately 6,000 square feet to the rear of the existing building. There
are currently 41 parking spaces on the site and based upon the parking require-
ment of the individual uses, the building would need 22 parking spaces
following the addition. The Zoning Ordinance would require 65 spaces, based
on one space per 400 square feet of gross floor area. The landscaping plan
submitted by the proponent illustrates 70 spaces, however, since the parking
demand is extremely low for the existing planned uses, the proponents have
suggested the additional parking be added only if needed in the future. This
could be accomplished by a proof -of- parking agreement. Mr. Larsen explained
that as part of the settlement of the Homart lawsuit, Edina has agreed to
construct the link road from France Avenue to West 77th Street. This road
should be constructed within the.next two years. The new intersection will
be extremely close to the existing southerly curb cut on the subject property.
The continued existence of this curb cut will pose a traffic hazard. Staff
has suggested that the southerly curb cut be removed prior to completion of
the new roadway and if the owners of the property do so desire they be
allowed to have a new curb cut for access onto the new link road. A land-
scaping plan has been submitted for approval. The exterior materials of the
addition will match the existing building and there will be some upgrading
of the exterior of the entire building. The Community Development and Planning
Commission considered the request at their meeting of September 3, 1986 and
recommended approval of the Final Development Plan, subject to the following
conditions: 1) a proof of parking agreement, 2) staff approval of the land-
scaping plan and schedule and 3) removal of the southerly curb cut prior to
completion of the new roadway. Member Richards.said that there were several
issues to be considered before making a decision on the construction of the
link road. Mr. Larsen said the link road was not critical to the owners. of
the subject property. Engineer Fran Hoffman clarified that the reason for
the staff recommendation regarding removal of the southerly curb cut was that
if the link road was constructed.the owners of the subject property should
know now that the curb cut should be relocated. No further comments being
heard, Member Turner offered the following resolution and moved adoption,
subject to the conditions recommended by the Planning Commission:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
Final Development Plan for Amcon Corporation, 7725 Parklawn Avenue, presented
at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 15, 1986, be and is
hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION FOR GRANDVIEW PLATEAU CONTINUED TO 10/6/86.
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner
to continue the public hearing on the vacation of utility easements on Lots 1,
2, 3 and 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau to the meeting of October 6, 1986.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR STUMP REMOVAL. Manager Rosland presented tabluation of bids
for stump removal at various locations in the City (approximately 6,487 inches)
showing Todd's Tree & Landscape at $0.95 per inch, Gary Arp at $1.04 per inch
and Steve Gorecki at $1.20 per inch. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by
Member Bredesen for award of bid for stump removal to Todd's Tree & Landscape
9/15/86
at $0.95 per inch.
Ayes:. Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 9, 1986 APPROVED. Motion of Member
Bredesen was seconded by Member Richards to approve the following recommended
action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of Sept-
ember 9, 1986:
1) Installation of a "STOP" sign on Lochmere.Terrace where it intersects with
West 78th Street,
and to acknowledge Section C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ON SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR CORRELLI'S PIZZA AND PASTA. Manager Rosland
advised that an application for an On Sale Beer License for Correlli's Pizza &
Pasta, 450514 Valley;View Road (formerly Rigotta's), has been investigated by the
Police and Health.Departments and that issuance of an On Sale Beer License is
recommended. Residential property owners within 500 feet have been notified
and no comment or objection has been received. No objections being heard, Member
Turner's motion-was seconded by Member Richards to approve issuance of an On Sale
Beer License to Correlli's•Pizza & Pasta, subject to final approval of the food
establishment license for Correlli's by the Health Department.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BUSH LAKE ROAD /WEST 78TH STREET. Engineer Hoffman
recalled that in its meeting of April 14, 1985, the Council has passed a resolution
asking Hennepin County to install a traffic signal at East Bush Lake Road and West
78th Street. The County is now ready to proceed and want to purchase some right of
way for the signal from Western National Mutual Insurance Company, 5350 W. 78th
Street. If Western National agrees to this they will be in non - conformance as to
building setbacks for any future development. Mr. Hoffman said he had advised.the
County to be sure this was taken into consideration when negotiating with Western
National. No action was taken.
LETTER DISCUSSED REGARDING PARKING RESTRICTIONS AT 50TH /FRANCE MUNICIPAL RAMP.
Member Richards questioned if a response had been drafted to Judith Favia,
3400 Fremont Avenue North, Minneapolis, regarding being ticketed for exceeding
the one hour parking limit and her suggestion that the ramp be a pay ramp to
provide for longer shopping time. Mr. Hoffman said pay parking has been dis-
cussed with the 50th and France Merchants Association and that they have no
desire for pay parking and are very supportive of the one hour restriction.
Mr. Rosland said a letter would be sent to Ms. Favia in response to her concern.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL BREAKFAST MEETING NOTED. Manager Rosland called
the Council's attention to a Metropolitan Council Regional Breakfast Meeting on
October 8, at 7:30 a.m. at the Hopkins House for the purpose of hearing aboilt the
issues the Council is dealing with as well as providing a forum for local govern-
ment input. Reservations will be made for those Council Members desiring to attend.
ELECTION JUDGES APPOINTED FOR GENERAL /CITY ELECTION. As recommended by the City
Clerk, Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following Election Judges be
appointed to serve on the Election Boards for the General /City Election to be held
on November 4, 1986, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make
any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: Precinct No. 1 -
Eugenia Williams, Chair, Lois Hallquist, Dorie Capetz, Barbara Anderson, Arleen
Friday, Celia Nightingale, Shirley De Leo, Doris O'Neill, Marguerite Sester, Mary
Fritner, Phyllis Kilgore, Carol Olson; Precinct No. 2 - Marjorie Ruedy, Chair,
Pauline Carroll, Joan Flumerfelt, Sara Kirkman, Ruth Mueller, Elizabeth Anfinson,
Dale Jaspers, Betty Jenson, Eva Johnson, Carol McGlone, Laurie McKay, Kathleen
Saterbak; Precinct No. 3 - Linda Smith,.Chair, Carol Bucklin, Deidre Hedrick,
Patricia Dill, Sherrill Estensen, Patricia Gries, Margaret Hagerty, Mary Kluesner,
Marie Koblisch, Kem Kuenzli, Christine Morgan, Marie Vorlicky, Judith Wehr;
Precinct No. 4 - Shirley Dibble, Chair, Helen Stafford, Rachel Schoening, Virginia
Courtney, Marian Cracraft, Marge Brothers, JoAnne Chayer, Sharon Hegstrom,
Marge Jamieson, Jeanette Lushine, Nina Potter, Anne -Marie Reynolds, Joanne Downey;
Precinct No. 5 - Linnea Erickson, Chair, Carol McPheeters, Phyllis Cooper, Mildred
Karr, Betty Benjamin, Mailand Card, Sheila Cron, Marjorie Grinnell, Helen Groth,
Hazel Hegeson, Carol Ledder, Barbara Martin; Precinct No. 6 - Jane Bains, Chair,
Catherine Swanson, Sue Zwakman, Barbara Herbers, Mary Cleaveland, Jean Flaaten,
Sherrill Borkon, Mary Manning, Ellie Reid, Gertrude Rocheford, Joyce Sutherland,
Eleanor Westerberg, Donna White; Precinct No. 7 - Bess Brudelie, Chair, Helen
Peterson, Naomi Ward, Kathy Engquist, Gertrude Snoeybos, Grace Andrews, Elaine
9/15/86
Carlson, Clara Fossey, Margaret Kelsey, DeLores Paul, Mary Rolland, Jane
Skelly, Evelyn Coffey; Precinct No. 8 - Jane Moran, Chair, Myra Hykes,
Florence Freudenthal, Kathy Bradford, Monna Reding, Jane Goetz, Barbara
Hultman, Jeanne Mueller, Joanne Ryan, Kathy Shea, Lee Strang, Patricia
Tattersall, Mary Webber; Precinct No. 9 - Aileen Konhauser, Chair, Jacqueline
Lindskoog, Patricia Monson, Judy Lund, Jean Field, Avona Carroll, Joyce Ervin,
Judith Frank, Annette Horton, Gertrude Nulsen, Janis Rife, Lavonne Stoakes,
Margaret Wodrich; Precinct No. 10 - Barbara Erlandson, Chair, Mary Shoquist, Jo Ann
Lonergan, Ruth Haggerty, Kathy Rivers, Jenny McBride, Molly Baranauckas, Joan
Buie, Marilyn Devereaux, Phyllis Jensen, Janet Kjome, Carol Olsen, Nancy Sour;
Precinct No. 11 - Geneva Smith, Chair, Jackie Prince, Alice Burnell, Gina
Sherman, Sharon Lee Smith, Joy Perunovich, Juanita Betz, Susan Hagan, Kathleen
McCarthy, Carol Melichar, Nancy Phillips, Betty Pollitt, Lois Steinback;
Precinct No. 12 - Ardis Wexler, Chair, Carol Hite, Shirley Bjerken, Mary Scholz,
Monica Nilles, Marge Erstad, Lucetta Klos, Phyllis MacLennan, Jan Burnett,
Virginia McCollister, Beth Montgomery, Pam Moody, Jan Windhorst; Precinct No. 13 -
Edna Thomsen, Chair, Patricia Harmon, Ilona Kerin, Mollie Sherry, Margaret Polta,
Helen Brown, Mary Goodrich, Mary Ann Groven, Margaret Handy, Hattie Jackson, Ann
Matula, Pauline Mertes, Elaine Tollefsrud; Precinct No. 14 - Mary Jane Platt,
Chair, Joyce Hanson, Karen Knutsen, Esther Olson, Louise Carlson, Donna Brastad,
Audrey Anderson, Amanda Bauman, Eva Bryan, Myrtle Grette, Phyllis Gulde, Marie
Windhorst, Doris Peterson; Precinct No. 15 -.Kay Luikens, Chair, Jean Teasley,
Sharon Soderlund, Barbara Courtney, Karen.Vickman, Alice Rice, Carolyn Klus,
Merry Krueger, Beth Rosenbloom, Jennifer Schoenzeit, Judith Traub, Sharon Zweig -
baum; Precinct No. 16 - Mary McDonald, Chair, Patricia Halvorson, Donna Montgomery,
Caroline Scott, Katherine Larson, Lois Awes, Madeleine Dobbelmann, Kathryn .
Harrington, Rosemary Kostick, Florence Schnepp, Mary Zotalis, Bonnie Bjerken,
Mary Ann Hans, Bernadine Chapman; Precinct No. 17 - Lorna Livingston, Chair,
Joyce Koets, Fay Clark, Margaret Delaney, Marie Bachman, Barbara Boyd, Joyce
Kahn, Jean McDermid, Joanne Merta, Mary Ryan, Ann Singer, Jerry Wright; Precinct
No. 18 - Jean Erdall, Chair, Selma Shelton, Patricia McCormack, Betty Lou
Petersen, Doris Blake, Janet Christenson, Phyllis Fuller, Elizabeth Genovese,
Nancy Huey, Mildred Pearson, Jo Anne Streed, Betty Doolittle; Precinct No. 19 -
Charlotte Scanlon, Chair, Audrey Nankiville, Jean Altman, Luverne Graham, Anne
LaBovsky, Linda Smith, Connie Bing, Margaret Bognanno, Alyse Sue Frishberg,
Nancy Grobovsky, Alyce Hamilton, Cathee Hare, Jane Hess; Precinct No. 20 -
Patricia Olander, Chair, Anita Delegrad, Evelyn Herkal, Harriet Koch, Barbara
Raap, Diane Ebert, Judith Larson, Bettye McClain, Mary Vanek, Amy Woods.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
CANVASSERS APPOINTED FOR GENERAL /CITY ELECTION. As recommended by the City Clerk,
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby appoints _the following as
Canvassers for the General /City Election to be conducted on November 4, 1986:
Ernest Buffington, Harold Habighorst, Glenn Harmon, Richard Herkal, Virgil
Johnson, Rolland Lundberg, Harry Melin, Sam Mobley, Howard Norback, Chet Ornat,
Willard Ott, Ralph Peters and Al Woods;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any
substitutions or additions as may be necessary.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
. Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
QUIT CLAIM -DEED AUTHORIZED CONVEYING PARCEL ON WEST 50TH STREET FROM CITY TO
HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY. Engineer Hoffman explained that in connection with
the West 50th Street Improvement five small parcels were involved adjacent to
the Hennepin County Library property located east of City Hall. Four of those
parcels were conveyed to the City and one parcel is to be conveyed to Hennepin
County. Motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption
of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
authorizes and directs the Mayor and Clerk to execute on behalf of the City a
Quit Claim Deed conveying the following described property to Hennepin County:
That part of West 50th Street being in the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest
Quarter of Section 18, Township 28, Range 24, descr =bed as follovs:
Commencing at the point of intersection of the easterly line of Tract D,
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 212,, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County
of Hennepin and the northerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue; thence on
an assumed bearing of South 68 degrees 14 minutes 51 seconds West along
9/15/86
said northerly right -of -way line, a distance of 87.30 feet; thence North
1 degree 01 minutes 08 seconds East, a distance of 255.05 feet to a point in
the Southerly right -of -way line of West 50th Street, said point being the point
of beginning.of. the tract of land to be described; thence continuing North
1 degree 01 minutes 08 seconds East a distance of 3.73 feet; thence Easterly,
a distance of 159:56 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the north,
having a radius of 1957.50 feet, a chord of 159.52 feet and a chord bearing of
South 79 degrees 40 minutes 38 seconds East to the southerly right -of -way line
of West 50th Street; thence Westerly, a distance of 159.00 feet along said
right -of -way line to the point of beginning.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
1987 BUDGET HEARINGS CONCLUDED; 1987 CITY BUDGET OF $11,201,791 ADOPTED. The
hearings on the - proposed 1987 Budget were continued from the Special Meeting of
September 12,'1986. Manager Rosland advised that 5 -6% increase in license fees
for restaurants, vending machines and pools is recommended. He also explained
the transfer of one fulltime person from the Assessing department to Inspections,
noting that a retirement is anticipated in Inspections. The Council Members
then individually presented their viewpoints on the proposed 1987 Budget, indi-
cating support or non - support for specific programs and line items. Collective
support or non - support for each item was then decided by motion and majority
vote. A discusion was held on the Park & Recreation Field Maintenance budget
of $67,951 and it was agreed that it should be cut by one -half and that the
Park Board should be advised of this action by the Council to which they could
then respond. The intent is that either field maintenance will be reduced by
one -half or user fees for the fields could be increased to make up that amount.
Following considerable discussion of a number of line items in the proposed
budget, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA
FOR THE YEAR 1987, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR
THE YEAR 1987 PAYABLE IN 1987
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 1987 is
.hereby adopted as hereinafter set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated
therefore:
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL GOVERNMENT
Mayor and Council $ 56,420
Planning 158,655
Administration 400,110
Finance 235,699
Election 24,864
Assessing 254,154
Legal and Court Services 280,000
TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT - $1,409,902
PUBLIC WORKS
Administration $ 95,267
Engineering 359,961
Highways 2,430,923
TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 2,886,151
PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY
Police $2,797,568
Fire 1,684,034
Civilian Defense 22,902
Animal Control 52,799
Public Health 239,898
Inspection 219,437
TOTAL PROTECTION OF
PERSONS AND PROPERTY 5,016,638
PARK DEPARTMENT
Administration 490,158
Recreation 103,175
Maintenance 812,040
TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT 1,405,373
9/15/86
NON- DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
Contingencies
Special Assessments on City Property
Capital Plan Appropriation
Commissions and Special Projects
TOTAL NON- DEPARTMENTAL
EXPENDITURES
TOTAL GENERAL FUND
80,000
75,000
105,000
223,727
483,727
$11,201,791
Section 2. Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby
established as hereinafter set forth:
GENERAL FUND
Transfer - Revenue Sharing Fund
Licenses and Permits
Municipal Court'Fines
Department Service Charges
Other
Transfer from Liquor Fund'
State Apportionments - .Sales Tax
Income on Investments
Aids - Other Agencies
Police Aid
TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS
$ 225,000
457,000
420,000
619,209
136,400
400,000
550,416
65,000
173,800
110,000
$3,156,825
Section 3. That there be and hereby is levied upon all taxable real and
personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce
the amounts hereinafter set forth:
FOR GENERAL FUND $8,044.966
Motion for adoption of the budget resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen, Richards
Resolution adopted.
Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION RATES
BE IT RESOLVED that the
Edina City Council
does hereby
establish the
following
salary schedule for fulltime
personnel for
1987:
5.10
Step 3
4.75
Step 1
Step 2
Step 3
Step 4
Management III
$44,772
$48,698
$52,624
$55,978
Management II
34,488
36,400
39,312
41,808
Management I
28,184
30,654
33,124
35,230
Technical Management
25,714
27,950
30,212
32,136
Technical IV
22,698
24,726
26,676
28,418
Technical III
20,592
22,386
24,180
25,740
Technical II
20,202
21,944
23,712
25,220
Technical I
18,044
19,656
21,242
22,568
General III
16,900
18,382
19,838
21,138
General II
15,704
17,030
18,434
19,604
General I
13,962
15,158
16,380
17,446
Public Safety:
PS Management III
37,986
41,288
.44,616
47,450
PS Management II
35,516
38,636
41,730
44,408
PS Management I
32,292
35,100
37,986
40,378
PS General II
19,734
21,476
23,192
24,700
PS General I
15,704
17,030
18,434
19,604
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
that the City of Edina does hereby establish
the following
compensation schedule for
part -time personnel:
vim„- n,,,,,,a
Level A
Level B
Step 1
$4.20
$4.60
Step 2
4.55
5.10
Step 3
4.75
5.45
Step 4
5.05
5.60
Step 5
5.40
5.70
Managerial
6.45
Seasonal
Level 1
3.50
3.75
3.90
Level 2
3.65
3.95
-4.15
9/15/86
Level 3 4.10
4.40
4.55
Level 4 4.40
4.65
4.80
Level 5 4.55 - 5.80
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen, Richards
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for payment
of the'following claims as per pre -list of 9/15/86: General Fund $693,469.47,
Art Center $833.93, Swimming Pool Fund $182.00, Golf Course Fund $3,741.37,
Recreation Center Fund $5,607.08, Edinborough Park $17.72, Utility Fund $368.28,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $81,516.98, Construction Fund $546,592.64, Total $1,332,329.47;
and for confirmation of payment.of the following claims dated 8.31/86: General Fund
$772,687.47, Art Center $245.53, Swimming Pool Fund $1,279.90, Golf Course Fund
$10,206.09, Recreation Center Fund $410.01, Gun Range Fund $112.12, Utility Fund
$769.65, Liquor Dispensary Fund $281,526.24, Total $1,067,237.01.
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 11:45 p.m.
ty Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 6, 1986
6:30 P.M.
The Edina City Council held a closed meeting on October 6, 1986, at 6:30 p.m.
regarding potential litigation.
Present were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
Also present was Manager Rosland, Craig Larsen, Attorney Erickson and Marcella
Daehn, City Clerk.
Manager Rosland.said the meeting was called to: l) advise the Council of an
inquiry regarding an adult bookstore, and 2) discuss potential litigation
regarding the Hansen rezoning request. Attorney Erickson explained the City's
legal position with regard to the two matters. No other business was discussed
by the Council.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
City Clerk
�a
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 6, 1986
Answering rollcall were Members Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
EDINA MASONIC LODGE PRESENTS $1,500 CONTRIBUTION TO CITY. Scott Whipple
presented a check in the amount of $1,500 to the City from the Edina Masonic
Lodge for use by the Fire Department for the acquisition of life saving equipment
for the Edina Rescue Squad, stating that this money came from the proceeds of
their annual flapjack festival. The following resolution was unanimously
adopted by the Council and read by Mayor Courtney:
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, for the past nine years, the Edina Masonic Lodge has donated money to
the Edina Fire Department for its rescue equipment; and
WHEREAS, this money has been earned by members of the Lodge from their efforts
in putting on an annual Edina Flapjack Festival; and
WHEREAS, a check in the amount of $1,500 has been generously given to the Edina
Fire Department for purchase of rescue equipment;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that most sincere
appreciation be expressed to all members of the Edina Masonic Lodge for its
interest in the well -being of all Edina residents through this generous
contribution; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be entered into the pages of the.
Minutes Book of the Edina City Council and that an appropriate copy be presented
to the
EDINA MASONIC LODGE
as a token of gratitute of the Edina City Council.
ADOPTED this 6th day of October, 1986.
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of August 4, 1986, were approved by motion of
Member Bredesen, seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Manager Rosland stated that in accordance with
Council's decision last spring a consent agenda has been prepared and will be
included as part of subsequent. agendas. There will be no separate discussion
of Consent Agenda items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which
case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its
normal sequence on the agenda. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by
Member Bredesen to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED ON ASSESSMENT FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -33
(WEST 492 STREET). Manager Rosland presented a revised analysis of assessment
for.Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -33 showing total construction cost of $9,412.70
with a 25% deduction of $2,353.18 for a net cost of $7,050.52 proposed to be
assessed against one assessable lot, against estimated assessment of $5,630.58
per lot. Engineer Hoffman said that at the Council meeting of September 15,
1986 he had asked that this assessment be continued to this meeting. He explained
that Oswald Peterson, owner of the lot to be assessed, had suggested that staff.
should consider a portion of the construction cost as an area improvement as
opposed to an individual improvement. Staff has re- analyzed the improvement
and now proposes that 25% of the cost ($2,353.18) should be allocated to the
50th and France Business District as an area improvement which will be assessed
to the District in 1987 as an addition to the annual maintenance assessment.
In response to questions of the Council, Mr. Hoffman said the 50th and France
Business District will be notified of the additional cost next year prior to
the special assessment hearings at which time any objection.could be voiced.
He added that he felt the assessment.of $7,050.52 as now proposed would be
considered reasonable by Mr. Peterson. No further comment being heard, Member -
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVIED ON ACCOUNT
OF SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. The City has given notice of hearing as required by law on the proposed
assessment rolls for the improvement hereinafter referred to, and at such
hearing held on September 15, 1986 and continued to October 6, 1986, has
considered all oral and written objections presented against the levy of such
assessment.
2. Each of the assessments as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the
office of the City Clerk for the following improvement:
Sidewalk Improvement No. S -33
10/6/86
does not exceed the local benefits conferred by said improvement upon the lot,
tract or parcel of land so assessed, and said assessment is hereby adopted
and confirmed as the proper assessment on account of said improvement to be
spread against the benefited lot, tract or parcel of land described therein.
3. The assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments, the first of
said installments, together with interest at a rate of 8.9% per annum on the
entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1987, to be payable with
the general taxes for the year 1978. To each subsequent installment shall be
added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments.
The number of such annual installments shall be as follows:
Name of Improvement Number of Installments
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -33 10 years
4. The City Clerk shall forthwith prepare and transmit to the County Auditor
a copy of this resolution and a certified duplicate of said assessments with
each then unpaid installment and interest set forth separately, to be extended
on the tax lists of the County in accordance with this resolution.
5. The City Clerk shall also mail notice of any special assessment which may
be payable by a county, by a political subdivision, or by the owner of any
right -of -way as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.061, Subdivision 4,
and if any such assessment is not.paid in a single installment, the City
Treasurer shall arrange for collection thereof in installments, as set forth
in said Section.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
n.
PUBLIC HEARING ON ZONING CHANGE R -1 TO PRD -2 (ROBERT HANSEN) CONTINUED TO 10/20/86.
As recommended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Turner
to continue the public hearing on the Zoning Change from R -1 to PRD -2 District
for.Robert Hansen to the meeting of October 20, 1986.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTER. Motion was made -by Member..Kelly, seconded
by Member Bredesen setting October 20, 1986 as hearing date for Preliminary Plat
Approval for the Carroll Addition.
Motion carried on rollcall: vote, five ayes._.
*PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION FOR GRANDVIEW PLATEAU CONTINUED TO 10/20/86.
Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen to continue the
public hearing on the easement vacation for Grandview Plateau to October 20, 1986.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NOS. 731 -A7. 1101 -All. 1111 -AlO AND 171 -A25 CONTINUED
TO 10/20/86. Manager Rosland recommended that First Reading of Ordinance Nos.
731 -A7, 1101 -All, 1111 -AlO and 171 -A25 be continued to the meeting of October 20,
1986 for further review by staff. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member
Bredesen to continue First Reading of the Ordinances to October 20, 1986.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT REGARDING INTESECTION OF TRACY /WARDEN HEARD. David Higgins,
5700 Warden Avenue, told the Council that it is very difficult and dangerous
to enter Tracy Avenue from Warden Avenue because the crest of the hill on Tracy
creates a "blind spot" for vehicles attempting to enter Tracy. He said that
speed on Tracy Avenue was also a concern and that families with small children
could not allow them to play out in their yards. Mr. Higgins was informed that
the matter would be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for their recom-
mendation and that he would be notified of the meeting.
*BID AWARDED FOR RELOCATION OF OVERHEAD CRANE /PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING. Motion
was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen, to award bid for reloca-
tion of the overhead crane in the Public Works Building to recommended low bidder,
Retterath Rigging, at $5,350.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
SHHSC JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT REVISION APPROVED. Member Turner explained that
the essence of the revision of the Joint Powers Agreement with South Hennepin
Human Services Council(SHHSC) is that SHHSC must have the approval of the
cities before starting a program. In the previous document the only requirement
of SHHSC to start a program was to inform the cities of the intent to start the
program. The revision also provides that SHHSC transfers control and direction
of new programs to another entity within two years. Member Turner said this was
10/6/86
in response to concerns several Council Members had raised regarding starting
new programs without approval of the cities. Following discussion, Member
Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by.-the Edina City Council that it hereby approves the SHHSC
Joint and Cooperative Agreement as revised, and authorizes and directs the
Mayor and Manager to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
DOG LICENSE RENEWAL NOTICES DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland explained that in
response to the Council and the Park Board staff has investigated the possibi-
lity of sending out notices regarding dog license renewals and to remind dog
owners of their responsibilities regarding leashing and defacating on public and
private property: .The City has issued approximately 1,500 dog licenses. The
initial license foe is $20 for un- neutered dogs and $7 for neutered, with renewals
at $5 for un- neutered and $2 for neutered. It is proposed to add one dollar to
the renewal fees to cover the cost of printing and mailing notices. Member
Richards said he would not support sending renewal notices as he felt dog owners
would not respond and that the problems in the parks regarding dogs should
handled by citations to dog owners who are in violation. Motion of Member
Kelly was seconded by Member Bredesen approving the printing and mailing of
dog license renewals which would remind dog owners of their responsibilities.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
REPORT DISCUSSED ON ASSISTED RENTAL HOUSING. Manager Rosland stated that in
response to Council's request the Planning Department has prepared a report on
assisted rental housing in Edina. The City is one of 77 suburban communities
which administer the Metro HRA, Section 8 Program which provides.rental assist-
ance to low income individuals and families through the issuance of certificates
and demonstration vouchers, both of which must be used in private buildings.
The report showed applications taken and placed on waiting list, applicants
receiving assistance and applicants with assistance establishing residence in
Edina for the previous two years and previous nine months. Each week the City
receives between 8 and 12 inquires or requests for assisted rental housing.
Within the City there are five apartment complexes which provide rental assist-
ance: Oak Glen, 72nd and Cahill, South Haven, 3400 Parklawn, Wood Haven, Summit
Avenue (under construction) Yorkdale, 7429 York Avenue and Yorktown, 7151 York Av.
The City also administers the Urban Hennepin County Rehabilitation Program.
Within the past year 7 applications were received, 4 were funded for a total of
$20,196 with roofing, plumbing and electrical repairs as the principal items.
Statistics for the H.O.M.E. program for 1985 were also reported. The Council
briefly discussed the information presented. No action was taken.
MINNEHAHA CREEK STATUS REPORT GIVEN. Engineer Hoffman said he had attended the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed Board meeting last month and had expressed to them
that the residents in Edina who have had continual flooding problems would like
to see some solution. Staff will do some detailed surveying and provide engin-
eering data to them and their engineers who will work with us. He indicated
Mrs. Francis is aware of this and she has reiterated her position that some-
thing be worked out with the Board before year end. Mr. Hoffman said the Board
is reluctant to do anything that would be precedent setting in terms of the
whole creek area but that he felt the Board will develop a policy that will be
of benefit to Edina residents abutting the creek. Member Kelly asked about the
engineering report on the dike.located in Meadowbrook Golf Course. Mr. Hoffman
said the report has not been submitted to us, that ligitation is occuring and
that may be the reason the Minneapolis Park Board has not made the report
available. Member Kelly said the water is high again. Mr. Hoffman said his
staff was aware of this but that he felt the Minneapolis Park Board was not
interested in being cooperative regarding this. No action was taken.
CONNECTION CHARGES LEVIED FOR SANITARY SEWER HC -10 (6428 MALONEY AVENUE).
Manager Rosland advised that in October, 1985, Richard Myklebust, 6528
Maloney Avenue, had petitioned the Council to take bids and install sanitary
sewer to his home asking that the cost be assessed against his property.
Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assess-
ment of the connection charge for House Connection No. HC -10 in the amount of
10/6/86
$5,100.00 to be levied against that part of the South 198 feet lying :East of
the West 141 feet except street, Block 16, MENDELSSOHN ADDITION (PIN 30 -117-
21-12- 0069), 6528 Maloney Avenue, payable over a period of six (6) years,
with the first payment collectible with real estate taxes payable in 1987,
and with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7.5% per annum.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Mr. Rosland explained that the sewer connection charge of $768.00 is unpaid
and recommended that this also be levied against the property. Motion of
Member Bredesen was seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RF.gnT.TTTT0N
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assess-
ment of the connection charge for Sanitary Sewer No. 69 in the amount of
$768.00 to be levied against that part of the South 198 feet lying East of
the West _141 feet except street, Block 16, MENDELSSOHN ADDITION (PIN 30 -117-
21-12- 0069), 6528 Maloney Avenue, payable over a period of six (6) years,
the first payment collectible with real estate taxes payable in 1987, and
with interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7.5% per annum.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly,. Richards, Turner, .Courtney
Resolution adopted.
1987 FEES AND CHARGES FOR PARK & RECREATION CONTINUED TO 10/20/86. As recom-
mended by staff, Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Kelly to
continue the proposed 1987 Fees and Charges for the Park & Recreation Depart-
ment to the meeting of October 20, 1986.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried...
*HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF DRAINAGE /UTILITY EASEMENT FOR LOT 4, BLOCK 2,
OAK RIDGE OF EDINA. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member
Bredesen.for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement
for drainage and utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accord-
ance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
That portion of the 7.5 foot Drainage and Utility Easement across
the easterly portion of Lot 4, Block 2, OAK RIDGE OF EDINA, described_
as follows:
Commencing at the.most southerly corner of said Lot 4; thence on
an assumed bearing of North 3 degrees 09 minutes 08 seconds East
along the easterly line of said Lot 4, a distance of 76 feet;
thence North 86 degrees 50 minutes 52 seconds West, a distance
of 5.50 feet to the point of beginning of the tract of land to
be described; thence .North 86 degrees 50 minutes 52 seconds West,
a distance of 2.00 feet; thence North 3 degrees 09 minutes 08
seconds East, parallel with the easterly line of said Lot 4, a
distance of 7.00 feet; thence South 86 degrees 50 minutes 52
seconds East, a distance of 2.00 feet;. thence South 3 degrees
09 minutes 08 seconds West, a distance of 7.00 feet to the point
of beginning.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of
notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14
days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days.
prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous
places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851.
Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION
OF EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
IN.THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
10/6/86
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
November 3, 1986, at 7:00 p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on the proposed vacation of the following easement for drainage and utility
purposes:
(Legal description as included in paragraph 1. of this resolution)
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or
not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should
be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the
extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements
within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation
affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or
controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or
water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation,
to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or other attend thereto,
for the purpose of §pecifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and
to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall.vote, five ayes.
*PETITION FOR SIDEWALK WEST SIDE OF HANSEN ROAD REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPART-
MENT. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen to refer
the petition for sidewalk construction on the west side of Hansen Road to the
Engineering Department for processing.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
LETTER FROM SHARON MING REGARDING ASSESSMENT FOR SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -34
NOTED. Member Kelly asked that a response be sent to Sharon Ming, 4110 Sunny -
side Road, regarding the special assessment for Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -34.
Mr. Hoffman said he would send a letter in response.
EDINA HOMECOMING GAME DISCUSSED. Member Kelly asked for a report regarding the
Edina Homecoming Football Game and the scuffle that occurred between Edina and
Richfield students following the game. Manager Rosland said he has alerted
the Braemar Arena staff to plan very carefully for the high school hockey game
between Edina /Richfield this winter to prevent a similar incident, and that he
would ask the Police Department to prepare a report. No action was taken.
STRATEGIC PLANNING CALENDAR DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported that she has met
with Gordon Hughes, Assistant Manager, regarding the Strategic Planning Calendar
for 1986. She asked for Council input on the following:
1/12/86 - Special Meeting to consider the City's Mission Statement - Suggestion
Barbara Arney be hired as facilitator for the meeting. Motion was made by
Member Bredesen, seconded by Member Richards and carried unanimously to hire
Barbara Arney as facilitator. Suggestion that the Chairmen of the advisory
boards and commissions be invited to participate in that discussion. It was
informally agreed that they should be asked to participate. Suggestion that
the issues raised by Member Kelly regarding land use be discussed at an upcoming
Council meeting so that the discussion could be used in preparing for the
January 12th meeting. It was informally agreed that land use be placed on the
agenda in the near future and that the members of the Community Development and
Planning Commission be invited to attend the meeting for their input.
MANAGEMENT AUDIT COMMITTEE RESPONSE TO MANAGER'S COMMENTS REGARDING REPORT
DISCUSSED. Member Turner recalled that following the report of the Management
Audit Committee last summer, the Manager had been asked to respond to their
recommendations. Following the Manager's report on August 18, 1986, the Council
had suggested the Committee give their response to the Manager's report. She
said in talking to the Chairman of the Management Audit Committee recently he
had thought it would be more productive for the committee members to give a
mini - evaluation a year after their report to see what progress has been made by
management in implementing their recommendations. It was informally agreed to
follow the suggestion.of the Chairman and invite committee members back next
summer.
VACANCIES NOTED IN BOARDS /COMMISSIONS. - Member Turner noted that there are
vacancies on the SHHSC, Heritage Preservation Board and the Art Center Board
and suggested that the Council conduct interviews prior to the next Council
meeting. It was informally agreed to conduct interviews at the next meeting
if the agenda was reasonable. Manager Rosland said he would let the Council
members know as soon as possible. No action was taken.
" . -� r{ .. �. ..V is v. �Y .. ., .. � .�. ♦w. "
10/6/86
METROPOLITIN COUNCIL °C' I i:: is OF SPORTTION /SEWER CHAPTrRS NOTED. In response
to the letter from Dottie Rietow, Metropolitan Council, regarding revising the
Council's Transportation and Sewer Chapters of the Development Guide, Member
Turner suggested that Mrs. Rietow and Allison Fuhr, Rapid Transit Board, be
invited to an upcoming Council meeting to report on the proposed revisions.,
Manager Rosland.said he would contact both of them and invite them to one of
the upcoming Council meetings.
PROCLAMATIONS APPROVED FOR MAYORS' D -DAY IN WAR ON DRUGS AND MASONIC FAMILY DAY.
Mayor Courtney asked for Council approval to issue proclamations for the follow-
ing: 1) Mayors' D -Day In The War On Drugs, and 2) Minnesota's Masonic Family Day ".
It was informally agreed to approve the issuance of the proclamations. .
HENNEPIN COUNTY RECYCLING ORDINANCE DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that
Hennepin County will conduct a public hearing on October 15 to consider an ordi-
nance mandating municipal recycling. The County's goal will require that 16%
of all solid waste must be recycled by 1990. This equates to about 8500 tons
annually for Edina. The City presently recycles about 950 tons excluding
voluntary leaf composting and recycling of cardboard by businesses. The
County anticipates substantial financial participation in a city's recycling
effort. The present proposal would provide funding of 50 -80% of municipal
recycling costs depending upon the success of the program. The County
presently funds 50% of the net cost of our pilot project and drop -off center.
Mr. Rosland said staff would attend the hearing and would convey any comments
that the Council may have regarding the proposed ordinance. No comments were
made.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED CANCELLING LEVY FOR 1987 ON $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by
Member Bredesen for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1987 GENERAL PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $5,400,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS, SERIES 1984
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
September 10, 1984, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of
principal and interest of its General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series
1984; said ad valorem tax in the amount of $1,156,000 being collectible with
and as a part of other general taxes for the year 1987; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of said
levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest for
said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the required
moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of.Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted
September 10, 1984, and collectible with and as a part of other general
property taxes in said City for the -year 1987, be and hereby are cancelled;
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota,
be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies
and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES COLLECTIBLE WITH 1987 GENERAL
PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION.REDEVELOPMENT - BONDS.
Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen for adoption of
the following resolution:
RESOLUTION CANCELLING AD VALOREM TAXES
COLLECTIBLE WITH 1987 GENERAL.PROPERTY TAXES LEVIED
FOR $2,200,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION REDEVELOPMENT BONDS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has, by resolution adopted
November 3, 1975, levied a special ad valorem tax for the payment of principal
and interest of its $2,200,000 General Obligation Redevelopment Bonds; said
ad valorem tax in the amount of $309,300 being collectible with and as a part
of other general taxes for the year 1987; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, permits the cancellation of
said levies providing moneys are on hand for payment of principal and interest
for said bond issue; and it has been determined by this Council that the
required moneys are on hand for the payment of said principal and interest;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that
those ad valorem tax levies made by resolution of this Council adopted
November 3, 1975, and collectible with and as a part of other general property
taxes in said City for the year 1987, be and hereby are cancelled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota,
be authorized and directed to cancel the above described ad valorem tax levies
and to delete said levies from taxes to be spread for the year 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
0.
10/6/86
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Bredesen
for payment of the-following claims as per pre -list of 10/6/85: General Fund
$330,225.06, Art Center $1,499.06, Capital Fund $6,160.00, Swimming Pool Fund
$185.35, Golf Course Fund $12,601.99, Recreation Center Fund $4,305.87, Gun
Range Fund $40.00;. Edinborough Park $13.50, Utility Fund $206,200.92, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $9,110.93, Construction Fund $3,120.60, IMP Bond Redemption
Fund $1,680.74, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $3,406.17, Total $578,550.19.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
n
City Clerk
II.A
MXCITY OF
0 801 EDINA
WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASCADE LANE BERMING AND LIFT STATION
The Edina City Council will on Monday, December 1, 1986 at 7:00 P.M., At
the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Hearing on the
necessity and feasibility of constructing a berming project and Lift Station
near the street listed above. Your receipt of this notice is an indication
that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties
which are considered to be benefited.
The estimated cost of this improvement is approximately $15,000.00. It is
proposed that this improvement be assessed on a per lot basis. The project
is proposed to be funded by special assessment and cooperative funding
from the Watershed and City..
This project is being proposed as a result of a petition by property
owners to reduce flooding, and meetings with Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District. The project would be a berm across the properties and a storm
sewer lift station behind the berm.
Construction of this improvement, if approved, will be accomplished in-.
1986 -1987. Assessments would be levied in 1987 with the initial installment
due in 1988. The improvement is proposed to be assessed over a ten year
period. The present condition of the Municipal Bond Market makes it
difficult to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged
on the unpaid balance, but it will not exceed the maximum allowed by law.
The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 3, 4, & 5, Cascade Falls.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the Hearing or presented at the Hearing itself.
If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between
8:00 A.M..and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Thank you.
Francis J. ffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
11/21/86
FJH:Im
L3
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitaria '
SUBJECT: Edina Ordinance No. 171
DATE: November 25, 1986
When the 1987 fees were adopted by the City Council, a
new fee category was inadvertently overlooked. The fee
category "Catering Food Establishment" adopted in 1986
should have been included in the 1987 fee schedule.
The attached ordinance amendment will increase the
Catering Food Establishment fee and include this license
category in the two fee classification for certified
and non - certified food establishments.
IV.A.1.
ORDINANCE NO. 171 -A26
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 171
TO INCREASE THE FEE FOR CATERING FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. The amount of the following described Fee Number of Schedule A
to Ordinance No. 171 is hereby amended to read as follows:
ORD. SEC.
NO. NO. PURPOSE OF FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT FEE NO.
731 5 Catering Food Establishment $305.00 per annum ($255 if 25a4
certified pursuant to
Ord. 731 -A7), plus
$75.00 per annum for
each additional
facility
Sec. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon
its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
30 -G -27
Mayor
c
IV. B. 1
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: Sign Ordinance Amendment for Mixed Development Districts
DATE: November 25, 1986
You will recall the Council granted First Reading to the
attached Ordinance at its last meeting.
At its meeting members asked for a comparison of signage
proposed for the Mixed Development District with other zoning
districts and asked that we attempt to notify other interested
parties of the hearing. I have attached a chart comparing allowed
signage in various districts for Council review. Also, following
the Council meeting I talked to the Sun reporter about a story
on the Ordinance.
An article was published in the November 26, 1986 issue
of the Sun - Current.
ORDINAIINCE I'M. 451 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 451 ADDING REGULA^1IONS FOR THE ' °IIXFD Di?VELODL.M; ]T DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF rDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 5 of Ordinance _�o. 451 is hereby amended by
adding the following paragraph:
(h) "fixed Development District:
(1) Area Identification Signs:
(a) ":D -3 and ?1D -4 Districts: One sign not
to exceed 50 square feet in area.
(b) SID -5 District: One sign -per development not to exceed
70 square feet in area. For developments with more
than one street frontage, one additional sign per
street frontage provided each additional permitted sign
does not exceed 40 square feet in area.
(c) Area identification signs shall be of uniform
design and materials.
(2) Intra Area Directories: One per rrajor entry, riot to
exceed 10 square feet.
(3) 'Multi -fair ily residential corro_ lex containing ].0 or rrore
dwelling units: one freestanding sign per corrplex riot to exceed
24 square feet in area. Individual buildings:- One wall rrounted
identification sign not to exceed 6 square feet.
(4) Office Buildings: One sign per building, not to exceed 50
square feet in area. Where such building is located on a corner
lot, one sign rray be located on each street frontage provided the
first does not exceed 50 square feet and other permitted signs do
not exceed 36 square feet.
(5) Public Institutional. or Recreational use: One sign per
street frontage, not to exceed 24 square feet in area.
(6) Accessory Retail Signs: One identification wall sign per
accessory use attached to the facing of the building at the
ground floor level. is permitted. - "he area of such sign shall not
exceed 15% of the ground floor wall facing. All. signs shall be
individual letters of unifor;r size, design, and materials.
(7) Free standing signs shall be placed no closer than 10 feet
to any street right -of -way, tlaxiaua height of freestanding
signs: Twelve feet.
(8) Teaporary signs: Refer to Section 3.
(9) Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon
its passage and publication.
Mixed Development
Districts
PC -3 Office
MD -3,4 MD -5 Regional Regional Industrial
under 5 + Commercial Medical
5 acres acres
Area
Identification
One
One per street
frontage.
One per Development.
100
One per
One per
Allowed Size
50 square feet
70 square feet
square feet plus one
freestanding sign per
Development.
5a square feet.
Development
80 square feet.
for first. 40
building per street
square feet for
frontage. 100 square
all others.
feet for first. 50 square
feet for all others.
Uffice
uildings
One per street frontage.
50
One per street
square feet for first.
frontage.
36 square feet for all
50 square feet
q
others.
--- -- --
for first.
-
"-"-""
36 square feet
for all others.
ulti- Family
,sidential
:omplex One per Complex
10 +Units) 1 24 square feet
ccessory One per use.
-tail 15% of first floor - --""--
wall area.
Residential
Developments
Plus parks
Churches, etc
One per street frontage.
24 square feet each.
- - - - -- I One per Complex.
24 square feet
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: November 24, 1986
VI.B
Consent Agenda
Material Description (General Specifications):
Gas Metering Replacement System
System replaces manual ticket method with hook -up to Public Works Computer
system - Funded from Capital Plan.
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Petroleum Equipment Service $ 5,300.00
2. Westside Equipment $ 9,842.00
Z. Pump & Meter Service, Inc. $ 12,063.00
Department Recommendation:
Petroleum Equipment Service $ 5,300.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid (S? is not
wt�i -3
_ op
Signat re Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City M ager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth R s nd, City M ager
,~ MEMORANDUM VII.A.
TO: KEN ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK 1Y1
SUBJECT: OPTECH III -P VOTING SYSTEM
DATE: NOVEMBER 26, 1986
Background
In January, 1985, Hennepin County, at the suggestion of the Elections and Voter
Registration Coordinating Committee, established the Voting Equipment Task Force
to assess the feasibility of initiating a uniform voting system for the County.
As you are aware, I have served as a member of the Task Force.
Under current state law, municipalities have the authority and responsibility
for selection and utilization of voting equipment and the County has the res-
ponsibility for preparing and printing the materials needed for statewide and
county elections. The result has been a variety of voting systems in the County
with increasing costs for providing support to these systems. The aging of
municipal voting equipment and the impressive potentials of technologies now
available for use in conducting elections has generated interest at both the
municipal and county level.
For the past year and a half the Task Force has examined the present systems,
identified alternatives, assessed potential savings of changing to a new system
and examined various approaches to address its goal of establishing a uniform,
accurate and timely voting system in Hennepin County.
Findings
After reviewing the potential of the various technologies now available for
conducting elections and developing criteria against which to assess the extent
to which these options meet state, county and municipal requirements, it was
unanimously agreed that optical scan equipment was the most viable in terms of
its physical, voting and processing capabilities. Sixty -five criteria were
developed and used to assess the merits of the various optical scan systems.
Cost and potential savings were important factors in determining the feasibility
of making this investment.
Recommendation
Upon completion of the evaluation the Task Force unhestitatingly recommended
the OPTECH III -P voting equipment manufactured by Business Records Corporation.
The equipment was used by Brooklyn Park in the primary and general elections
this year as part of the certifying process mandated by the state: The equipment
has also been subjected to environmental testing and has met or exceeded the
standards drafted by the Federal Election Commission and the applicable sections
of Minnesota Election Laws. The state will make its decision as to certification
of the equipment on December 18, 1986.
In anticipation of state certification, Hennepin County has included in their
1987 budget approximately $250,000 to purchase the equipment necessary to support
this system. Ten municipalities in the County have submitted purchase orders
and several are pending.
,.i
Memorandum
November 26, 1986
Page 2
Application for the City of Edina
The City now owns 112 Automatic Voting Machines (AVMs) and in preparation for
the elections held recently nine machines were inoperable, seven of which need
major repair. AVMs have not been manufactured for several years.and the ability
to continue to obtain parts is uncertain. Therefore, I do not believe it would
be cost effective to continue to attempt to maintain this type of voting equipment.
Also, you will recall that for the 1984 Presidential Election the AVMs did not
have enough ballot capacity and it was necessary to conduct the election using
a paper ballot for the county judicial offices. We could possibly have the
same problem for the next presidential election.
If the City approves acquisition of the optical scan voting
expected that the greatest cost savings will be in storage,
in preparing the machines and hours worked by election judg
will also count votes cast by absentee ballots. Presently,
must be counted by the election judges. In November, 1984,
absentee ballots cast.
Recommendation for the City of Edina
system, it is
drayage, hours
as. This system
all absentee ballots
there were 2,826
I would recommend that the Council consider the purchase of and authorize the
use of the optical scan voting system.
This would require purchase from Business Records Corporation of 23 OPTECH III -P
units and approximately 176 voting booths, plus needed ancillary equipment for a
total expenditure of not more than $143,000, subject to prior certification of
this equipment by the State of Minnesota. The City's Capital Plan shows $50,000
for 1986 and $84,000 for 1987 for voting machines. If approved, it would require
an additional Capital Plan expense of $9,000 in 1988.
Current price of the OPTECH III -P unit is $4,800 per unit and $181.00 per booth.
However, because of the volume purchase by municipalities in the County, together
with the City of St. Paul, a price reduction to $4,176 per unit and $163.00 per
booth is anticipated if ordered 'before December 31, 1986. Delivery would be
requested in;time for the 1988 elections and payment would not be made until the
equipment is delivered.
ACTION RECOMMENDED
Authorization of the use of the optical scan voting system and purchase from
Business Records Corporation of 23 OPTECH III -P units and approximately 176 voting
booths, plus needed ancillary equipment for a total expenditure of not more than
$143,000.
f�
I' VII. B.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: HEDBERG PROPERTY ACQUISITION
DATE: November 26, 1986
We have updated our cash flow analysis for the Southeast Edina Tax Increment
Financing District in light of the possible acquisition of the Hedberg
property. This analysis contains the following basic assumptions:
* Completion of the entire Edinborough project except Phase 2 Office
* A three percent annual growth in the assessed value of all properties
in the district
* An interest rate of six percent on invested HRA funds
Arriving at a value for the Hedberg property will, of course, require
additional work. For purpose of this analysis, we assumed that the Hedberg
property and the Edinborough property are equal in value; i.e. about
$6.00 per square foot. It can be argued that values-decrease as one
moves further from I -494; however, we have not attempted to quantify this
now.
Our analysis considered first the purchase of the entire 30 acres located
in the existing T.I.F. District and second, the purchase of only 15 acres.
A bond issue of $9 million is used for the first alternative and $4.5 million
for the second. Both alternatives assume an Edinborough type purchase;
i.e. the HRA acquires the property and then negotiates a redevelopment
agreement with a developer.
The cash flow analysis illustrates that without the
development of the property, substantial deficits w
District's reserve balance with either alternative.
is that the resources of the entire T.I.F. District
support the Edinborough project for the next six to
1993, excess increments will be available for other
attached analyses.)
almost immediate
ill occur in the
The reason for this
are required to
seven years. After
projects. (See
Our conclusion, therefore, is that an Edinborough type property acquisition
would not be feasible due to the lack of excess tax increments from other
developments in the District. As an alternate, the HRA could negotiate
November 26, 1986
Ken Rosland
Page Two
a contract with a developer prior to pursuing acquisition. Such a contract
could perhaps reduce the HRA's exposure caused by holding the land. Or,
the HRA could attempt to negotiate an option with Hedbergs in order to
gain control of the property during contract negotiations in order to
lessen the burden of actual ownership.
Advantages /Disadvantages of HRA Ownership
In my opinion, ownership of all or part of the Hedberg property presents the
following advantages and disadvantages to the HRA:
Advantages
• The HRA could select a developer of'its choosing.
• The HRA could dictate land use more extensively than the Compre-
hensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance would otherwise permit.
• A more flexible park dedication could be provided.
• The HRA could control the schedule of development more closely.
• If the HRA acquired all of the Hedberg property, a single, overall
master plan could be prepared which should result in better
planning. (This is an advantage of having only one owner, whether
or not it is the HRA.)
Disadvantages
• If the HRA expends substantial amounts to purchase the property,
a development must proceed relatively rapidly to produce tax
increments. The HRA could, therefore, be forced to accept a
less than desirable development and /or redeveloper's agreement
in order to generate tax increments.
• If the HRA acquired only part of the Hedberg property, we would
risk having two developers involved with the Hedberg property
which may result in poorer planning.
• Control of the property will likely result in substantial holding
costs.
GH /sw
Attachment
REVENUES
START YEAR
PAY 86
-
REINV. INT RATE
7.00%
INTEREST RATE
8.87%
i
-- INFLATION RATE:
...
_ _.
-----
- - -
- --
OLD ASSMT
3.00Z
RESID
.00%
ELDERLY
3.00%
OFFICE
3.00%
BASE VALUE
2,598,211
FIRST YEAR COLL
- 90.001
-
2NO YEAR COLL
IO.00Z
MILL RATE
10.00%
YEAR
YEAR ACCUMULATED
LESS DISTRICT
MILL
TAX
TAX
TAX
ASSESSED
RESIDENTIAL
ELDERLY
OFFICE
BASE
RATE
TAX
INCREMENT
ASSESSED
PAYABLE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
Z
INCREMEN
COLLECTED
I
1985
1986
11,231,986
11,231,986
(2,598,211)
8,633,175
10.00%
863,378
777,040
1986
1987
11,568,946
60,000
200,000
200,000
12,028,946
(2,598,21:1
9,430,135-
10.00%
943,073
935,104
1987
1988
11,916,014
1,700,000
2,050,000
2,360,000
18,026,014
(2,598,211)
15,427,803
10.00%
1,542,780
1,482,810
1988
1989
12,273,494
4,020,000
2,111,500
2,430,800
20,835,794
(2,598,211)
18,231,583
10.00%
1,823,158
1,795,661
1989
1990
12,641,699
4,690,000
2,174,845
2,503,724
22,010,268
(2,598,211)
19,412,057
- 10.00%
1,941,206-
1,929,461
1990
1991
13,020,950
4,690,000
2,240,090
2,578,836
22,529,876
(29598,211)
19,931,665
10.00%
1,993,167
1,987,970
1991
1992
13,411,579
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
23,065,073
(2.598,211)
20,466,862
10.00%
2,046,686
2,041,334
1992
1993
13,813,926
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
23,467,420
(29598,211)
20,869,209
10.00%
2,086,921
2,082,897
1993
1994
14,228,344
4,690,000
2,301,293
2,656,201
239881,838
(2,598,211)
21,283,627
10.00%
2,128,363
2,124,218
1994
1995
14,655,194
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
24,308,688
(2,598,211)
21,710,477
10.00%
2,171,048
2,166,779
1995
1996 --
15,094,850
4,690,000 -2.307,293
2,656,201
24,148,344
(2,598,211)
22,150,133-
10.00%
2,215,013
2,210,617
1996
1997
15,547,695
4,690,000
2,307,293
2.656,201
25,201,189
(2,598,211)
22,602,978
10.00%
2,260,298
2,255,769
1997
1998
16,014,126
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
25,667,620
(2,598,211)
23,069,409
10.00%
2,306,941
;2,302,277
- 1998
1999
16,494,550
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
26,148,044
(2,598,211)
23,549,833
10.00%
2,354,983
2,350,179
1999
2000
16,989,387
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,6569201
26,642,880
(2,598,211)
24,044,669
10.00%
2,404,467
2,399,519
2000
2001
17,499,068
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,6569201
27,152,562
(2,598,211)
24,554,351
10.00%
2,455,435
2,450,338
- 2001 - -
2002
18,024,040
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
27,677,534
(2,598,211)
25,079,323
10.00%
2,507,932
2,502,683
2002
2003
18,564,761
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
28,218,255
(2,598,211)
25,620,044
10.00%
2,562,004
2,556,597
2003
2004
19,121,704
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
28,775,198
(2,598,211)
26,176,987
10.00%
2,617,699
2,612,129
2004 --
2005 -
19,695,355
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
29,348,849
(2,598,211)
26,750,638
10.00%
2,675,064
2,669,327
2005
2006
20,286,216
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
29,939,710
(2,598,211)
27,341,499
10.00%
2,734,150
2,728,241
2006
2007
20,894,803
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
30,548,296
(2,598,211)
27,950,085
10.00%
2,795,009
2,788,923
- 2007 - - --
-2008 -
21,521,647
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
31,175,141
(2,598,211)
28,576,930
10.00%
2,857,693
2,851,425 -
2008
2009
22,167,296
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
31,820,790
(2,598,211)
29,222,579
10.00%
2,922,258
2,915,801
v
2009
2010
22,832,315
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
32.485,809
(2,598.211)
29,887,598
10.00%
2.988.760
2.982.110
Rr
a
�
TAX PAYABLE
IN JULY
48.0f
�
-
TAX PAYABLE IN DEC. -
--- 42.0E
- ..
V _
-- .. -- - - -
TAX PAYABLE
IN DEC.
10.0%
,
INT. RATE
6.00S
MONTHLY SCHEDULE OF RECEIPTS - EOINBOROUGH
TAX
-- - - --
YEAR
INCREMENT
YEAR TAX LAND OTHER
BOND INVESTMENT
TOTAL
.i
'j
ASSESSED
COLLECTED
MONTH
ASSESSED INCREMENT SALES INCOME PROCEEDS INCOME
RECEIPTS
1985
863,378
12
1985
0
1986
943,073
1
1986
52,641
52.641
I.�
1987
1,542,780
2 -
1986 86,338
- - 52,654
-138,992 - - - - - - - -- -
1988
1,823,758
3
1986
53.099
53,099
1989
1.941,206
4
1986
49,936
49,936
.-
--- 1990--
1.993,167
-- -- 5 -
-- 1986 -- - - -- - -
- - -- 49.936
- - 49.936 - - -- -- - -- -
1991
2,046,686
6
1986
44,686
44,686
1992
2,086,921
7
1986 414,421
36,840
451.261
1993
2,128,363
8
-- 1986 - - --
33,596
- 33,596 - -- - - --
1994
2.171.048
9
1986
28,264
28,264
1995
2.215,013
10
1986
4,000,000 22,086
4,022.086
1996
2.260.298
- - 11
- ... 1986 - -- - ... ....._
. _.. - - 36.696....,
- -. 36.696 -- . - -.._. - .
i
1997
1998
2,306,941
2.354.983
12
1
1986 362,619
1987
31,380
25,280
393,998
25,280
(
1999
- 2,404,467
- - -_- - 2
-- 1987 - - 86,338 -
- 23.628
109,966-------- --
2000
2.455,435
3
1987
23,078
23,078
2001
2,507,932
4
1987
9,000.000 0
9,000,000
-- -
2002
- 2.562.004
- -- 5
-- 1987 - -- - - -- -- - - -
- 23.924
- -- 23.924 - -- -- ._
j
2003
2,617,699
6
1987
22,943
22,943
2004
2.675.064
7
1987 452,675
19,389
472,064
i
2005
2,734,150
- - - -- 8
- 1987 - ..._ -.. __.._._.._
19.970
- - -- 19,970---- - --- -- -..
tv
2006
2.795,009
9
1987
18,970
18,970
2007
2.857,693
10
1987
17.256
17,256
�-
- 2008
- 2.922,258
- - -- 11- --
1987 - -- --- ._ ------ ...
-... 16,242----
16.242 — --
2009
2,988,760
12
1987 396,091
12,073
408.164
56.198,086
1
1988
11,545
11,545
,i
2
1988 - 94,301 -._.. __ ..._. _
10.924
--... 105.231 -- - -- --
�"
3
1988
11,450
11,450
`I
j l
4
1988
8,548
8,548
- -1988 -- - - - - - -- ...- - - .
8.591
- 8.591
to
6
1988
8,634
8,634
-
7
1988 740.534
5,858
746.392
_...
_. 8
1988 _
8.911
- 8.911
j
9
1988
8,956
8,956
10
1988
8,404
8,404
11- -
-- 1988 - -- -- --
- -- -- - - -- 8.446
— 8,446 - - --
12
1988 647,968
5,088
653,056
1
1989
5,034
5,034
2
1989 154,278 -
4,381
-158,659-------- - --- --
`
3
1989
5,174
5,174
4
1989
2,354
2.354
-
-
- -- -
- -- 5
- 1989 - - - -- - -- -- — - -- ..
-. -- -- -- _.._ ... 2.365
— 2.365
j I
6
7
1989
1989 875.404
2.377
0
2,377.
875,404
8
1989
2,867
---- -2.867
9
1989
2,882
2.882
10
1989
2.415
2.415
--
-- - -
— I1 --
1989 -- - -- - - -- - -- --
-- 2.421
-. 2.427 -
�°
12
1989 765.918
0
x1,65.978
a
1 1990 0 0
.2 1990 182.376 0 -182.376
3 1990
0 0
4 1990 0 0
5 1990 0 0
6 1990 0 0
7 1990 931.779 0 931.779
8 1990 0
9 1990 0 0
10 1990 0 a
11 1990
0 0
12 1990 815,307 0 '15,307
1 1991 0 0
2 1991 194,121 0 194,121
3 1991 0 0
4 1991 0 0
5 1991 0 0
6 0 0
1991 1 956.720 0 956,720
7 199
8 1991 ---0 -------0
9 1991 0 0
10 1991 0 0
11 1991 0 0
12 1991 837.130 0 837,130
1 1992 0 0
2 1992 199.317--- 0 -----199.317
3 1992 0 0
4 1992 0 0
5 1992 0 0
6 1992 0 0
7 1992 982,409 0 982.409
8 1992 -- 0 0 -
9 1992 0 0
10 1992 0 a
11 1992 ---a -- - --o
12 1992 859.608 0 859.608
1 1993 0 0
—2 - -- -1993 -204.669 0 —204.669
I. 3 1993 0 0
4 1993 0 0
5 1993 .--.o -- -- -- ---. 0
6 1993 0 0
7 1993 1,001.722 0 1.001.722
8 -- 1993 - - - - -- 0v"—
9 1993 0 0
10 1993 0 0
11 1993 0 0
12 1993 876.507 0 876.507
aq
r
-CONVERSION TO YEARLY
- - - -
-- - - -- 1994
-2, 128 .363 -- - --- ----
- - - - -- 0--
2:128:363 - -- - - - - -- --
1995
2,171,048
0
2,171,048
rr
1996
2,215,013
0
2,215,013
'
1997
2.260.298
-0
2.'60.298 ... --
1998
2,3069941
0
2.306,941
1r
.I
1999
2.354,983
0
2,3549983
- -- - -
-- - 2000-
2.404.467- - -- -
.. _...,. __.._,..__----- -- - - -0
2. 404, 467---------- _______
j
2001
2,455.435
0
2,455.435
r
2002
2,501,932
0
2.507,932
2003
2.562.004
_ - .._ .. ... 0
2.562.004
2004
2,611,699
0
29617,699
2005
2.675,064
0
2,675,064
- - - - --
- - - - - -- - - 2006
--- 2.734. 150 -- -- .._... -- - ....__......-
-- - -- - -- -- 0
2.134,150 --
IMP
2007
2,795,009
0
2,795,009
2008
2.857,693
0
2,857,693
.. ..._..__. . ....
..._..__.._....- .. - 2009
2.922.258. .........
_ - - -0
2.922.258-- ---- --- ------ -
53086971.7
• i. l
I .
,I
�►
e
0
;
I
I '
MONTHLY
LIST OF EXPENDITURES
- EOINBOROUGH
OLD BOND
r
CAPITAL
DEBT
NEW BOND EXT.BOND
SERVICE ANOTHER
ANOTHER
OTHER
TOTAL
I.- - - ---.
MONTH
-------
YEAR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXPEND.
SERVICE
PR1NC. PRINC.
INTEREST-' PRINCPL
INTEREST
EXPEND
OISBURS
4r
12
1985
'.'.------- _- ..- ...-- -- ..
0
1
1986
50,000
0
50.000
2
1986
50,000
-
50,000
r
3
1986
50,000
50.000
4
1986
50,000
635,137
685,737
-
- -- 5
----1986
- 50.000
- -
-...
-
- -- °-
50.000 - -- ._
4r
6
7
1986
1986
1.100,000
1.100.000
513.863
1.100,000
1,613,863
8
1986
1,100,000
-
-
- --
1,100.000- -
9
1986
1,100,000
1.100,000
10
1986
1,100,000
153.912
1,263.912
11
- --1986
- 1.100.000
12
1986
1.100,000
1,100.000
1
1987
1,1009000
5139863
1.613.863
2
- 1987
220.000...
0
135.775
-- - -
-- 355.775
4r
3
1981
220.000
2209000
4
1987
8 . 020
613,912
8.633,912
- - - - --
5
--1987--
220.000
-- -
- - - -- - -
- - -
- -- --
220.000 - - - -- - -- -
4tr
6
1987
220,000
220.000
7
1987
220,000
511,863
733,863
8
1987
220,000
135,775
r
9
1987
220,000
2209000
V
10
1987
220.000
141.750
361.750
-- ..._.
11
-- 1987
220.000
- -- -
- - -
--
--
-220.000 -- --
12
1987
220.000
0
630,000
850,000 '
1
1988
513,863
513.863
l
2
-1988
--- -- - --
- - -
- - -- - 0
135.775 --
- - - --
- --
- 135.775 - - -- -- --
3
1988
0
..I
4
1988
591.750
591.750
---- -
- - -5-
-1988
-----------
- - - - --
---- - - - - - --
- -
- -
- -0 - -.. _.
6
1988
0
7
1988
513,863
50.000
563,863
8
--- -1988
- - -
- -- -
135.775 -
------- - -
--
- 135.775 - - --
9
1988
0
10
1988
119.250
119,250
- —
-11
--1988
-- ... -- - -- -
.. _ . -- - - --
-- - - - -- —
- - --
-- - 0 - -- - --
12
1988
0
630,000
50,000
680.000
1
1989
150.000
513.863
663,863
-
- 2
- -- 1989
- - - --
-
-- -- - ... 0 --
135 .775 -- -
- - - - - --
-
135.775- - - - --
,,�
3
4
1989
1989
569,250
0
569,250
—5--1989
-- - - - -
-- - -- --
- O - --
n
6
1989
0
7
1989
508,988
85.000
593,988
- -- --
- 8
— 1989
- --
- -
- - 50.000
- 135.775
--
v
9
1989
0
10
1989
96.300
96,300
11-
1989
--
- - - -0 -- - - -
ss
r Sf
12
1989
150.000
630.000
85.000..'865.000
0
1
1990
150,000
508,988
658,988
- - 2
1990 -
-
- 0
134.475
- -
- - - -
- -- --
134,475 - - - -
3
1990
0
4
1990
546,300
546,300
5
1990
0
6
1990
0
~
7
1990
503,925
85,000
588,925
8
- 1990 - -
- - - -
- - -
50,000
134,475
9
1990
0
r
10
1990
72,900
72,900
11 ..
1990
--
0 -
r
12
1990
150,000
619,500
85,000
854,500
1
1991
150,000
503,925
653,925
- - - -- 2 - --
1991 - -
- - -- -
- - - -- --
- - - -0-
133.125 --
- -
- - --
.__.. - - --
133,125 - - - - - -- --
3
1991
0
A►
4
1991
522,900
522,900
5
1991 ..
-
6
1991
0
r
7
1991
498,600
85,000
583,600
j.' 8 - -
-- -1991-
- - - - - --
50,000 - -
- -- 133,125------
- - - - --
-
183,125 - - - - - --
(j 9
1991
0
r
10
1991
49,050
49,050
- 11
1991
_. __ ._
_., __..._. _...
-
0 - -- _
4
12
1991
200,000
609.000
85,000
894,000
1
1992
150.000
498,600
648,600
- - - 2----
1992
-- -- -
- -- -
- - -- 0 --
-131.725 --
- - - --
- -- -
- 131,125 - -- - -- - - -
3
i-
1992
0
4
1992
499,050
499.050
5 -
1992 --
-
- ..
.
-
6
1992
0
I„ 7
1992
493,125
85,000
578,125
- - - -8 --
1992 - --
- - - --
100,000 -
- 131,725
- - - --
-- -
- - --
231,725 -- - - --
9
1992
0
10
1992
24,750
24,750
11 -
- 1992
12
1992
275,000
595,000
85,000
955,000
1
1993
200.000
493.125
693,125
i ----- - -2 - --
1993 -- -
- --
- - - -- - - -
- --0
- 128,825
- - - - - --
-- - --
128,825 - - - - --
3
1993
0
4
1993
474,750
474.750
5
1993 -
6
1993
0
7
I .
1993
485,525
85,000
570,525
{ - - -- - 8 -1993
--
--
100,000 - -
- -- 128,825-
228,825 - -- --
9
1993
0
V
10
1993
0
11 -
1993. ...__..
-.. -...__
_ . --
r
_ 12
m
1993
325,000
575,750
85,000
985,750
ssl
- --
CONVERSION TO YEARLY
0
- 1994 -
- 200,000
100,000
1,215,200
375,000
553,000
170,000
2,613,200 - -
1995
400,000
150,000
1,184,900
450,000
526,750
170,000
2,881,650
1996
900,000
150,000
1,122,850
475,000
495,250
170,000
3,313,100
1997
900,000
150,000
1.039,375
500,000
462,000
170,000
3,221,375
1998
900,000
200,000
954,400
550,000
427,000
170,000
3,201,400
1999
900,000
200,000
864.400
575,000
388,500
170,000
3.097,900
- -- - 2000 - - - --
- 900.000
200,000
772,950
650,000
348,250
170,000
3,041.200 - - -
r
2001
1,000,000
250,000
676,000
675,000
302,750
170,000
3,073.750
2002
1,000,000
250,000
570,000
700,000
255,500
170,000
2,945,500
2003
1,000,000
250.000
463,500
725,000
206,500
170,000
2,815,000
i►
2004
1,000,000
550,000
356,500
725,000
155,750
170.000
2,957,250
`
2005
1,050,000
600,000
225,750
750,000
105,000
170,000
2,900,750
- - 2006 -
1,050,000
600,000
89,250
750,000
- 52,500
170,000
2,711.750 - - --
2007
0
0
170,000
170,000
`
2008
170,000
170,000
2009
170,000
- 170,000 ,
r
9,000,000
8,568,000
4000000
i
G
_.__- ______. -_
I
r I
•
. t '' 'I
4w
� i !
RESERVE BALANCE
ESTIMATED
i"
TOTAL
TOTAL
SURPLUS
RESERVE
MONTH
YEAR
RECEIPTS
DISBURSEMENTS
(DEFICIT)
BALANCE -
AW
________________'""--------"'-"'"------------------------------
12
1985
0
0
0
10,578,250
-
-- - - - - - -1
- 1986-
- -- 52,641
- 50,000
2,641
2
1986
138,992
50,000
88,992
10,669,884
3
1986
53,099
50,000
3,099
10,672,983
4
1986
49,936
685,737
(635,801)
10,037,182 - --
5
1986
49,936
50,000
(64)
10,037,118
6
1986
44,686
1,100,000
(1,055,314)
8,981,804
------
- - - - -- - - - - -- - -7
- -- 1986
- 451,261
1,613,863
(1,162,602)
7,819,202 - - - - -- - - --
8
1986
33,596
1,100,000
(1,066,404)
6,752,798
to
9
1986
28,264
1,100,000
(1,071,736)
5,681,062
10
1986
4,022,086
1,263,912
2,758,174
8,439,236 - - - - -
11
1986
36,696
1,100,000
(1,063,304)
7,375,932
12
1986
393,998
1,100,000
(706,002)
6,669,930
-- 1
1987 -
-- 25,280
- 1,613,863
(1,588,583)
5,081,347
2
1987
109,966
355,775
(245,809)
4,835,538
3
1987
23,078
220,000
(196,922)
4,638,616
4
1987
9,000,000
- 8,633,912
366,088
5,004,704 - -
5
1987
23,924
220,000
(196,076)
4,808,627
6
1987
22,943
220,000
(197,057)
4,611,570
-------- - -
-- - -- - -- 7
- 1987
472,064
._......733,863
(261.799)
4, 349 ,711- - -- - - - - -- -- - --
�..
8
1987
19,970
355,775
(335,805)
4,013,966
!'I
9
1987
18.970
220,000
(201,030)
3,812,936
- 10
1987
17,256
361,750
(344,494)
3,468,442 -
11
1987
16,242
220,000
(203.758)
3,264,684
12
1987
408,164
850,000
(441,836)
2.822.848
- -1
- 1988
-- 11,545
- -- 513,863
(502,318)
2,320,530 - - - -- - - - - - - -- - --
2
1988
105,231
135,775
(30,544)
2.289,986
3
1988
11.450
0
11,450
2.301,436
.. 4
1988
8,548
- 591,750
(583,202)
1.718,234 - - - - -
5
1988
8.591
0
8,591
1,726,826
` I
6
1988
8,634
0
8,634
1,735,460
--
----- ------ - - - - -7
- -1988
-- 746,392
- 563,863
182,529
1,917,989 - - - - - --
8
1988
8,911
135,775
(126,864)
1,791,125
`
9
1988
8,956
0
8,956
1.800,081
10
- 1988
8,404
119,250
(110,846)
1,689,235 - - - - - -- - -
11
1988
8,446
0
8.446
1.697,681
12
1988
653,056
680,000
(26.944)
1,670,737
- --
- - - -1
- 1989-
5, 034
-- 663,863 -
- (658,829)
- 1,011.909
2
1989
158,659
135.775
22,884
1,034,792
to
3
1989
5,174
0
5,174
1.039,966
_ -
- - - - -_ ... -. -- -- -- 4
1989
- 2.354
- - 569.250
(566.896)
473.070
5
1989
2,365
0
2,365
475,435
6
1989
2,377
0
2,377
477,812
L,,
7 --
1989 --
875,404-
593,988 -
- -- 281,416
-- -159,228 -- -
8
1989
2,867
185,775
1182,908)
576,320
9
1989
2,882
0
2.882
579,202
- - -- ----
- - - - -- - - -- - 10
-- 1989 -
-- 2.415
- - - -- 96.300 -
(93.885)
- 485.316 -- - - - -- - - - --- - -
11
1989
2,427
0
2,427
487,743
12
1989
765,978
865.000
(99.022)
388,721
ft
4 _
1
1990
0
658,988
(658.988)
(270.267)
2
1990
182,376
134,475
47.901
(222,366)
3
1990
0
0
0
(222.366)
4
1990
0
546.300
(546.300)
(768.666)
5
1990
0
0
0
(768.666)
6
1990
0 -
0
0
(768.666)
7
1990
931,779
588.925
342,854
(425,812)
8
1990
0
184,475
(184,475)
(610,287)
9
1990
0
0
0
(610,287)
10
1990
0
72,900
(72.900)
(683.187)
I1
1990
0
0
0
(683,187)
12
1990
815,307
854,500
(39,193)
(722.380)
1
1991
0
653.925
(653,925)
(1,376.305)
2
1991
194,121
133.125
60.996
(1,315,310)
3
1991
0
0
0
(1.315.310)
4
199,
1
522,900
(522.900)
(1,838,210)
5
1991
0
0
0
(1,838,210)
6
1991
0
0
0
(1.838,210)
7
1991
956,720
583,600
373,120
(1.465.090)
#401 1
8
1991
0
183.125
(183,125)
(1.648,215)
9
1991
0
0
0
(1.648,215)
10
1991
0
49.050
(49.050)
(1.697.265)
A
11
1991
0
0
0
(1.697.265)
L
12
1991
837.13 0
894,00 0
(56.870)
(1,754,134)
1
1992
0
648,600
(648.600)
(2.402,734)
%0
2
1992
199.317
131.725
67,592
(2,335,143)
3
1992
0
0
0
(2,335.143)
4
1992
0
499,050
(499.050)
(2,834,193)
5
1992
0
0
0
(2.834.193)
6
1992
0
-- 0
0
(2.834.193)
7
2
ll::2
982,409
578,125
404.284
(2.429.908)
8
0
231:725
(231,725)
(2.661,633)
9
1992
- - 0
0
0
(2.661,633)
10
1992
0
24,750
(24.750)
(2.686,383)
11
1992
0
0
0
(2.686.383)
12
19:2
859,608
955,000
(95.392)
(2.781.775)
1
1993
0
693.125
(693.125)
(3,474,900)
2
1993
204,669
128.825
75,844
(3.399,057)
3
1993
- - 0
0
0
(3,399.057)
4
1993
0
474.750
(474.750)
(3.873,807)
5
1993
0
0
0
(3.873.807)
6--
1993
0
0
0
(3.873,807)
7
1993
1,001,722
570.525
431,197
(3,442,610)
8
1993
0
228,825
(228,825)
(3.671,435)
-- ---- 9 --
1993
-- -- 0
- 0
0
(3,671.435)
10
1993
0
0
0
(3,671.435)
11
1993
0
0
0
(3.671.435)
---1993----
876 .507
985,750
(109,243)
-(3,780.678)
CONVERSION TO YEAR
0
0
`
1994
2,128,363
2,613,200
(484,837) (4,265,515)
- 1995
2,171,048
2,881,650
(710,602) (4,976,117) "
1996
2,215,013
3,313,100
(1,098,087) (6,074,204)
V
1997
2,260,298
3,221,375
(961,077) (7,035,281)
- - -- - -- 1998--
-2,306,941 -
3,201,400
(894,459) (7,929,740) - -- -- - -' -" - -
1999
2,354,983
3,097,900
(742,917) (8,672,657)
2000
2,404,467
3,041,200
(636,733) (9,309,390)
-
- - - - -- 2001
2,455,435
3,073,750
(618,315) (9,921,705)
2002
2,507,932
2,945,500
(437,568)(10,365,273)
`
2003
2,562,004
2,815,000
(252,996)(10,618,269)
- - - -- - - - - -- 2004
2,617,699
2,957,250 -
(339,551)(10,957,820) -- - - -- -- - "
2005
2,675,064
2,900,750
(225,686)(11,183,506)
`
2006
2,734,150
2,711,750
22,400 (11,161,106)
- --- - - - - -- 2007
2,195,009
170,000
2,625,009 (8,536,097) - -
2008
2,857,693
170,000
2,687,693 (5,848,404)
`
2009
2,922.258
170,000
2,752,258 (3,096,146)
I
I
I '
� I „I
,l, it - -.. " --
...---.__.- - -- -._ ..- - ..-- -- -----
-- - - -- ------
-- - --' -
19
5
i
S7
- -_
i
v I'�
REVENUES
START YEAR
PAY 86
-
I
REINV. INT RATE
7.00%
INTEREST RATE
8.812
INFLATION RATE:
-- -
- - --
__
.i
OLD ASSMT
3.00Z
RESID
.00%
ELDERLY
- 3.005
OFFICE
3.00%
BASE VALUE
2,598,211
FIRST YEAR COLL
- - - 90.00%
2ND YEAR COLL
10.002
MILL RATE
10.00%
YEAR
YEAR ACCUMULATED
LESS DISTRICT
MILL
TAX
TAX
TAX
ASSESSED
RESIDENTIAL
ELDERLY
OFFICE
BASE
RATE
TAX
INCREMENT
ASSESSED
PAYABLE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
VALUE
SUBTOTAL
SUBTOTAL
%
INCREMEN
COLLECTED
1985
1986
11,231,986
11,231,986
(2,598,211)
8,633,775
10.00%
863,378
777,040
1986
1987
11,568,946
60,000
200,000
200,000
12,028,946
(2,598,21a)
9,430,735-
10.00%
943,073
935,104
1987
1988
11,916,014
1,700,000
2,050,000
2,360,000
18,026,014
(2,598,211)
15,427,803
10.00%
1,542,780
1,482,810
1988
1989
12,273,494
4,020,000
2,111,500
2,430,800
20,835,794
(2,598,211)
18,237,583
10.00Z
1,823,758
1,795,661
- -1989 - -
1990
12,641,699
4,690,000 -
2,174,845
2,503,124
22,010,268
-(2,598,211)
19,412,057 -
10.00%
1,941,206-
1,929,461
1990
1991
13,020,950
4,690,000
2,240,090
2,578,836
22,529,876
(2,598,211)
19,931,665
10.00%
1,993,167
1,9879970
1991
1992
13,411,579
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
23,065,073
(2,598,211)
20,466,862
10.00%
2,046,686
2,041,334
1992
1993
13,813,926
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
23,467,420
(2,598,211)
20,869,209
10.00%
2,086,921
2,082,897
1993
1994
14,228,344
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
23,881,838
(2,598,211)
21,283,627
10.00%
2,128,363
2,124,218
1994
1995
149655,194
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,6569201
24,308,688
(2,598,211)
21,710,477
10.00%
2,171,048
29166,779
1995
1996 --
15,094,850
- 49690,000 -
29307,293
2,6569201
24,748,344
(2,598,211)
22,150,133-
10.00Z
2,2159013
2,210,617
1996
1997
15,547,695
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
25,201,189
(2,598,211)
22,602,978
10.002
2,260,298
29255,769
1997
1998
16,014,126
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
25,667,620
(2,598,211)
239069,409
10.00%
2,306,941
2,302,277
- - 1998 -
1999 -
16,494,550
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
26,148,044
(2,598,211)
23,549,833
10.00%
2,354,983
29350,179
1999
2000
16,9899387
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
26,642,880
(2,598,211)
2490449669
10.00%
2,404,467
2,3999519
�wl
2000
2001
17,499,068
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
27,152,562
(2,598,211)
24,554,351
10.002
2,455,435
2,450,338
- 2001 -- - --
2002 -
18,024,040
4,690,000 -2,307,293
2,656,201
27,677,534
(2,598,211)
25,079.323--10.00%
2,5079932
2,502,683
2002
2003
18,564,761
4,6909000
2,307,293
2,656,201
28,218,255
(29598,211)
25,620,044
10.00%
2,5629004
2,556,597
2003
2004
19,121,704
4,690.000
2,307,293
2,656,201
28,775,198
(2,598,211)
269176,987
10.00%
2,617,699
2,612,129
2004 - - - - - --
--2005 -'
19,695,355
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
29,348,849
(2,598,211)
26,750.638
10.00%
2,675,064
2,669,327
2005
2006
20,286,216
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
29,939,710
(2,598,211)
27,341,499
10.00%
2,734,150
2,728,241
2006
2007
20,894,803
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
30,548.296
(2,598,211)
27,950,085
10.00%
2,795.009
2,788,923
- 2007 -- ----
2008
21,521,647
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
31,175,141
(2.598,211)
28,576,930`
10.00%
2,857.693
2,851,425
2008
2009
22,167.296
4,690,000
2,307,293
2,656,201
31,820,790
(2,598,211)
29,222,579
10.00%
2,922,258
2.915,801
v
2009
2010
22,832,315
4.690,000
2.307.293
2,656,201
32,485,809
(2,598.211)
29,887.598
10.00%
2,988.760
2.982.110
v
II
�r
I
vi
i
TAX PAYABLE IN JULY 48.0%
TAX PAYABLE IN DEC.- - --- -42.01 -- - - - --
TAX PAYABLE IN FEB. 10.05
4U IFS
INT. RATE 6.00%
MONTHLY SCHEDULE OF RECEIPTS - EDINBOROUGH
LAND OTHER BOND INVESTMENT
SALES INCOME PROCEEDS INCOME
-----------------------------------------
52,641
52,654
53,099
49,936
49,936
44,686
36,840
33,596
28,264
4,000,000 22,086
- - - - - -- - -- 36.696
31,380
25,280
23,628
23.078
4.500.000 1.524
- - -- - 22.931
21,946
18.386
18.963
17.957
16,238
15.220
12.621
12,095
11.477
12,006
9.107
- - - 9.152
9.198
6,425
9.481
9,528
8.980
- - - 9.024
7,245
7,201
6.558
7,363
4.553
4.576
4,599
0
5.100
5,125
4,670
- - -- - - -- - 4.693
2,291
TOTAL
RECEIPTS
0
52,641
138,992
53,099
49,936
49,936
44,686
451,261
33,596
28,264
4,022,086
- 36.696-
393.998
25,280
109,966-
23,078
4,501,524
---22,931 -
21,946
471,061
18,963
17,957
16,238
- 15,220
408,711
12,095
- 105,784-
12,006
9,107
- 9,152 -
9,198
746,959
9,481
9,528
8,980
- 9,024-
655,212
7,201
160,836 -
7,363
4,553
- 4,576 -
4,599
875,404
- 5,100 -
5,125
4,670
-- 4,693 --
768,270
TAX
YEAR
INCREMENT
YEAR
TAX
-
ASSESSED
-------------------------------------------------
COLLECTED MONTH
ASSESSED
INCREMENT
1985
863,378
12
1985
1986
943,073
1
1986
1987
1,542,780
2
1986
86,33f
1988
1,823,758
3
1986
vI
1989
1,941,206
4
1986
1990
1,993,167 - -
5
- 1986
1991
2,046,686
6
1986
y
1992
2,086,921
7
1986
414,421
1993
2,128,363
8
1986
1994
2,171,048
9
19(1986
b
1995
2,215,013
10
16
1996
2,260,298
11
1986
1997
2,306,941
12
1986
362,615
1998
2,354,983
1
1987
1999
2,404,467
2
1987
86,33E
2000
2,455,435
3
1987
V
2001
2,507,932
4
1987
2002
2,562,004 - - --
5
- 1987 --
- - - - -- - --
2003
2,617,699
6
1987
2004
2,675,064
7
1987
452,675
2005
2,734,150
8
1987
%o
2006
2,795,009
9
1987
2007
2,857,693
10
1987
2008
2,922,258
11
1987
y
2009
2,988.760
12
1987
396,091
!
56,198,086
1
1988
- -
2
1988
94,307
y
3
1988
4
1988
5
- -- -•1988
-
6
1988
7
1988
740,534
8
1988
•
9
1988
10
1988
- - -
- -- -- - -
-11-
1988
y
12
1988
647,968
l
1989
2
1989
154.278
3
1989
4
1989
- - - - --
5---
1989 -
- - - -- - ----
6
1989
y
7
1989
875,404
8
1989
-
y
9
1989
10
1989
--
I. .
12
1989
765,978
4U IFS
INT. RATE 6.00%
MONTHLY SCHEDULE OF RECEIPTS - EDINBOROUGH
LAND OTHER BOND INVESTMENT
SALES INCOME PROCEEDS INCOME
-----------------------------------------
52,641
52,654
53,099
49,936
49,936
44,686
36,840
33,596
28,264
4,000,000 22,086
- - - - - -- - -- 36.696
31,380
25,280
23,628
23.078
4.500.000 1.524
- - -- - 22.931
21,946
18.386
18.963
17.957
16,238
15.220
12.621
12,095
11.477
12,006
9.107
- - - 9.152
9.198
6,425
9.481
9,528
8.980
- - - 9.024
7,245
7,201
6.558
7,363
4.553
4.576
4,599
0
5.100
5,125
4,670
- - -- - - -- - 4.693
2,291
TOTAL
RECEIPTS
0
52,641
138,992
53,099
49,936
49,936
44,686
451,261
33,596
28,264
4,022,086
- 36.696-
393.998
25,280
109,966-
23,078
4,501,524
---22,931 -
21,946
471,061
18,963
17,957
16,238
- 15,220
408,711
12,095
- 105,784-
12,006
9,107
- 9,152 -
9,198
746,959
9,481
9,528
8,980
- 9,024-
655,212
7,201
160,836 -
7,363
4,553
- 4,576 -
4,599
875,404
- 5,100 -
5,125
4,670
-- 4,693 --
768,270
�A
'
1
1990
2.838
2.838
- -
x
1e90
uo.n*
2,180
184.55
3
mo -
��3,102
`mo
»�3.102
`om
«
1-
5
1990
om
om
o
m
m
390
390
-
/
m
,
so
,1
- -- '-
- v
1990
-
1^184
- 1,184 ---
o
mo
� �oo
`oo
� �m
`oo
m
1--
o
1990
om
om--
m
am
815.307
o
815,307
-
1
1991
o
o
- -' -
-- - 2 --
1991
- 194.121 ' - - '
- - - �� -'---0---194.121
------
tn
»
1991
0
o
^
199
»
»
o
1991
' o
'o-
»
1991
»
»
�
/
1991
za�x
o
os�x
--- - ----'
-- v
1991
-
--- o
— -- o------ -
�
o
mo ^
o
o
m
199
o
o
�� - --
u
1991
'- o--
o-----'--
a
zm1
837.130
o
on 1m
,
1
19
o
o
� �--------------'o
oo
199,317 ------
- - '-----0
--199.317----------- --
�
mo
�"
o
o
!J
^
mo '
o
o
5
1992
- o
o'
|
o
1992
o
o
/
1992
982,40
o
982.40
v--
1992
-------- --'� -
'- �� �� --'�--''o----
»------ — -
~�~ '!
o
1992
o
n
�
m
1992
o
o
o
1992
- --
-'---o
- o -- ---
/
m
ma
859.608
o
859,608
2
1993
204,669
204,669
^
^'~
.
"
' |
^
1993
o
o
- -'- -'- -
5
1993
o
- o--
o
,
mm
1993
1.001.722
o
o
o
1.001.72
o--
oo
-- - -
- - -' ----'o-----
o---------'--
|
,
�mo
o .
o
|.�
m
1993
o
o
�
u
1993
o
o
12
1993
876.507
0
876.507
NIS '!
��
I
CONVERSION TO YEARLY
1994
2,128,363
- 0
2,128,363 -- -- - -
1995
2,171,048
0
2,171,048
4✓
1996
2,215,013
0
2,215,013
1997
2,260,298
0
2,260,298
1998
2,306,941
0
2,306,941
V
1999
2,354,983
0
2,354,983
...... -- -- . - - - 2000
2,404.467 -
- -- 0
2,404.467 -- --
2001
2.455,435
0
2,455,435
4V
2002
2,507,932
0
2.507,932
2003
2,562,004
0
2,562,004 - -
2004
2,611,699
0
2,617,699
~
2005
2,675,064
0
2,675.064
2006
2,734,150
- - 0
2,734,150 - -- - - - -
2007
2,795.009
0
2,795,009
r
2008
2.857,693
0
2,857,693
2009
2,922,258
0
2,922,258 - -
53086971.7
4w
I
r t
I
r
M
r
I.
I'
s,
m
`
MONTHLY LIST
OF EXPENDITURES
- EDINBOROUGH
OLD BOND
`
CAPITAL
DEBT
NEW BOND EXT.BOND
SERVICE
ANOTHER ANOTHER
OTHER
TOTAL
MONTH
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YEAR
EXPEND.
SERVICE
PRINC. PRINC.
INTEREST
PRINCPL INTEREST
EXPEND
DISBURS
`
12
1985
0
1
1986
50,000
0
50,000
2
1986
50,000
-
-- 50,000
3
1986
50,000
50,000
4
1986
50,000
635,737
685,737
5
1986
50.000
-- --
-
- - -
- 50,000
6
1986
1.100,000
1.100.000
7
1986
1.100,000
513,863
1.613.863
8
1986
1,100,000
1,100,000
9
1986
1.100.000
1,100,000
10
1986
1,100.000
163.912
1,263,912
11
-- 1986
1.100.000
--- .__. -__
_ -
- ..- - -----
- - - -- --
1.100,000 -
12
1986
1.100,000
1.100,000
1
1987
1.100,000
513,863
1,613,863
2
1987
220.000
0
135.775
- --
355,775
3
1987
220,000
220.000
4
1987
3.720,000
613,912
4,333,912
5
- 1987
220,000
-
- - .. - - -
- - --
- 220.000 - - - - -
6
1987
220,000
220.000
7
1987
220,000
513,863
733.863
8
1987
220,000
135,775
355,775
9
1987
220.000
220,000
10
1987
220,000
141.750
361,750
11
1987
220.000
-- - - - - - -
-
- - -- -
-- 220.000 - - - -
`
12
1987
220,000
0 315,000
535,000
1
1988
513,863
513,863
2
1988
0
135,775
-- - - - - --
- --
135,775 -
V
3
1988
0
4
1988
591,750
591,750
5
1988
- -- - -
- - - --
-- --o -- - -
v
6
1988
0
7
1988
513,863
50.000
563,863
8
1988
135,775
-
-
-- 135,775
9
1988
0
10
1988
119,250
119.250
- --
- 11 --
1988
- - -- -
-- - -
-- - -- - - - --
- - . _
-
- 0 - - - -- --
.
12
1988
0 315,000
50,000
365,000
1
1989
150,000
513.863
663.863
2
1989
-
-
- - 0
135,775
-- ----
V
3
1989
0
j
4
1989
569.250
569,250
! -
- -- -5 --
1989
-
- -- -
- -
- -- --- - - - - --
- --
- 0 - - - - --
6
1989
0
7
1989
508,988
85,000
593,988
8 -
1989
------ --
50,000
135,775
-
- -
- 185.175 - -
9
1989
0
j
10
1989
96,300
96,300
- -
- -11 --
1989
- - - - --
- - --
--
d „j
12
1989
85,000 315,000
85,000
485.000
m
r '
i r
r 1 1990 150,000 508,988 658,988
2 - 1990 . . - -- 0 134,475 - -- - - 134,475 ..... -
3 1990 0
4 1990 546,300 546.300
5 1990 0
6 1990 0
r 7 1990 503.925 ,• 85,000 588,925
8 1990 50,000 134.475 - - - - -- 184,475 -
9 1990 0
V 10 1990 72,900 72,900
11 1990 0
12 1990 85.000 309,050 85,000 479,050
1 1991 150,000 503.925 653,925
2 1991 0 133,125 __._. _. _- .,.._ __ _.- 133.125 -- -- -
3 1991 0
4 1991 522,900 522.900
5 1991 _. 0
6 1991 0
7 1991 498,600 85.000 583,600
- - 8 1991 - _. . - - 50.000 - 133.125 - -- -- - - --- - -- - - 183.125 - - - - -- -
V 9 1991 0
10 1991 49,050 49,050
j 11 _ .. 1991 - 0
12 1991 90.000 303,100 85,000 478,100
r 1 1992 150.000 498,600 648,600
- - - °2 - -- 1992 - - ._ ..__ - 0 131 ,725 -- -- -- 131.725 -- -- - -
r 3 1992 0
r 4 1992 499.050 499,050
'.I
5 1992 0 . .
6 1992 0
7 1992 493.125 85,000 578,125
- -- -- 8 - 1992 - -- - - -- -- - -100.000- 131.725 - - --------------231.725 - - -- - --
9 1992 0 ,
j 10 1992 24,750
24.750
11 - 1992 - — 0 --
12 1992 110.000 296,800 85,000 491.800
r 1 1993 200,000 493.125 693,125
I -- - - - - - -- . _.. - -- 2 -- 1993 --- - - -- --- -... -- - -- - -- -- -- 0 128.825 - - -- -- -- — ---128.825 - - - --
V _a 3 1993 0
4 1993 474.750 474,750
t -- - - 5 --- 1993 - -. - -- _. _.....---- - ...._ _._ 0. -
6 1993 0
r I ; 7 1993 485,525 85,000 570,525
l-- - =— 8- -1993 -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- 100.000 128.825 - - - - --- - - - - - -- 228.825 - - -- - - - --
9 1993 0
r 10 1993 0
11 1993 .. - - 0
12 1993 110,000 289.100 85,000 484.100
Sh
•
,
1 �I
CONVERSION TO YEARLY
- 1994
- 200,000
100,000
1,215,200
130,000
281,400-
170,000 - -
`
1995
400,000
150,000
1,184,900
150,000
272,300
170,000
1996
900,000
150,000
1,122,850
175,000
261,800
170,000
1997
900,000
150,000
1,039,375
220,000
249,550
170,000 - -
v I
1998
900,000
200,000
954,400
250,000
234,150
170,000
1999
900,000
200,000
864,400
2759000
216,650
170,000
- 2000
900,000
200,000
772,950
350,000
197,400
170,000 -- -
`
2001
1,000,000
250,000
676,000
385,000
172,900
170,000
2002
1,000,000
250,000
570,000
400,000
145,950
170,000
2003
1,0009000
250,000
463,500
410,000
117,950
170,000 -- -
2004
1,000,000
550,000
356,500
425,000
89,250
170,000
2005
1.050,000
600,000
225,750
425,000
59,500
170,000
-
- - 2006 ----------- - - -
- -- -- 1,050,000
600,000
89,250
425,000
- --- 29,750-
170,000- - - - - --
r
2007
0
0.
170,000
2008
170,000
2009
170,000----
4.500,000
4.471,600
I
I
4000000
V �'I
II
u,
i
vl.
-
--------
- - -
- --
-
C �r
5
i
j
~
RESERVE BALANCE
ESTIMATED
TOTAL
TOTAL
SURPLUS
RESERVE
MONTH
YEAR
RECEIPTS
DISBURSEMENTS
(DEFICIT)
BALANCE
V
------------------------------------------------------°°----------
12
1985
0
0
.. 0
10,578,250
- - 1
- 1986
- 52,641
50,000
2,641
10,580,891 -- - -- - - - -
2
1986
138,992
50,000
88,992
10,669,884
r
3
1986
53,099
50,000
3,099
10,672,983
4
1986
49,936
685,737
(635,801)
10,037,182
5
1986
49,936
50,000
(64)
10,037,118
r
6
1986
44,686
1,100,000
(1,055,314)
8,981,804
- -- - - 7
1986
451,261
1,613,863
(1,162,602)
1,819,202 - - - - - - -
6
1986
33,596
1,100,000
(1,066,404)
6,752,798
M
9
1986
28,264
1,100,000
(1,071,736)
5,681,062
10
1986
4,022,086
1,263,912
2,758,174
8,439,236
11
1986
36,696
1,100,000
(1,063,304)
1,375,932
12
1986
393,998
11100,000
(706,002)
6,669,930
1
1987
25,280
1,613,863
(1,588,583)
5,081,347 -- -- - -- - --
2
1987
109,966
355,775
(245,809)
4,835,538
r
3
1987
23,078
220,000
(196,922)
4,638,616
4
1987
4,501,524
4,333,912
167,612
4,806,227
5
1987
22,931
220,000
(197,069)
4,609,158
6
1987
21,946
220,000
(198,054)
4,411,104
-- -- 7 --
1987 -
--- 471,061
733,863
(262,802)
4.148,303 -- - - - -- -- --
8
1987
18,963
355,175
(336,812)
3,811,490
9
1987
17,957
220,000
(202,043)
3,609,448
10
1981-
16,238
361,750
(345,512)
3,263,936
11
1987
15,220
220.000
(204,780)
3,059,156
12
1987
408,711
535,000
(126,289)
2,932,867
- T
-- 1988
- 12.095
-- 513.863
(501.768)
2,431.099 -
2
1988
105,784
135,775
(29,991)
2,401,108
•
3
1988
12,006
0
12,006
2.413,114
- - 4
1988
9,107
- 591.750
(582.643)
1,830,471 -- - - -
5
1988
9.152
0
9.152
1.839.623
6
1988
9,198
0
9,198
1,848,821
-
- - - -- - - 7
- 1988
- 746,959
- - 563,863
183,096
2,031.917 -- - --
8
1988
9,481
135,775
(126.294)
1,905,623
9
1988
9,528
0
9,528
1,915,151
10
1988
8,980
119.250
(110.270)
1.804,881 -
` '
11
1988
9,024
0
9,024
1.813,905
12
1988
655,212
365,000
290,212
2,104,117
-
- - -- - - - - -- 1
-- 1989 -
-- 7.201 -
-- 663.863
(656.662)
1 .447.455 - - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - -
2
1989
160.836
135,175
25,061
1,472.517
3
1989
7,363
0
7.363
1.479,879
_ ...__....._ 4
1989
4.553
569.250
(564.697)
915.182 -
5
1989
4,576
0
4,576
919,758
6
1989
4,599
0
4,599
924,357
- - -- 7 -
- -- 1989 - -
- -- 875,404 --
593,988
- 281,416
1.205,773 - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - -
8
1989
5,100
185.775
.(180,675)
1,025,098
9
1989
5,125
0
5,125
1,030,223
10 --
1989 -
- 4,670
96,300
(91.630)
938,593
11
1989
4,693
0
4,693
943.286
12
1989
768,270
485,000
283.270
1,226.556
5
55
to 5' - r
.- e
14W
1
1990
2,838
658.988
(656,150)
570,406
2
1990
184,555
134.475
50,080
620,486
3
1990
3,102
0
3,102
623.589 - -
4
1990
386
546,300
(545,914)
77,675
Vd
5
1990
388
0
388
78,063
-
- .._._.. 6
1990
390..__.....
0
390
789454 -
~
7
1990
931,779
588,925
342,854
421.308
8
1990
1,184
184,475
(183,291)
238.017
9
1990
1,190
0
1,190
239,207
10
1990
832
72.900
(72.068)
167,138
4w
11
1990
836
0
836
1679974
_
... ... ....._._.__.___.-- --- -- - -12 --
1990
815.307
479.050
336.257.
- 504,231 - - -- - - - - --- -
1
1991
0
653.925
(653,925)
(149,694)
~
2
1991
194.121
133.125
60,996
(88,699)
3
1991
0
0
0
(88.699) - - -
4
1991
0
522.900
(522,900)
(611,599)
~
5
1991
0
0
0
(611,599)
--
- - - - -- - - - - -6 -
1991
p
... _ 0
p
... (611.599) -- - -- - - - --
�I
7
1991
956,720
583.600
373.120
(2389479)
ft
8
1991
0
183,125
(1839125)
(421,604)
_._ .. .. _,. 9 ._,
1991
_ 0
0
0
( 421. 604) - - - - - - - --
10
1991
0
49.050
(49,050)
(470,654)
4w
11
1991
0
0
0
(470.654)
•- - - - - --
12 -
1991
- 837.130
478,100
359,030
-- (111,624) - -
1
1992
0
648.600
(648,600)
(760,224)
!_
2
1992
199.317
131.725
67,592
(692.632)
3
1992
- - - -0 -
0
0
(692.632)
4
1992
0
499.050
(499,050)
(1,191,682)
5
1992
0
0
0
(1,191,682)
6
- 1992
- -- . -_. 0
-- 0 -° -
0
(1. 191. 682 ) — - - - -- — - - -- -- - - -- —
I,I
7
8
1992
1992
982,409
0
578,125
231.725
404,284
(231.725)
(787,398)
(1.019,123)
- - -- - - - -- 9
1992
--- -- 0
- - 0
0
(1,019.123)
-�
10
1992
0
24.750
(24,750)
(1,043,873)
11
1992
0
0
0
(1,043,873)
---------------
- - - - -- - - -12
1992 -
- - -- 859,608
- -- 491,800 - _
367,808
- (676,064) - - - - - -- — -- -- - -
�'�
1
1993
0
693,125
(693,125)
(1,369.189)
2
1993
204,669
128,825
75,844
(1,2939346)
,.i
3
1993
0
0
0
(1.293,346) _-
4
1993
0
474,750
(474,750)
(1,168.096)
I-
5
1993
0
0
0
(1,768,096)
-6 —
1993 -
-- - - - -- - 0
..._.. p _..
—. - - 0-
(1.768.096) -- - - -- - -- - .._ _.
7
1993
19001.722
570,525
431.197
(1,336,899)
8
1993
- -1993
0
- ... - - 0 -
228.825
- -- . --- 0
(228,825)
- 0
(1,565,724)
(19565,724) -
�'
10
1993
0
0
0
(1,565,724)
11
1993
0
0
0
(1,5659724)
_—
`2 -1993-
876,507
- 484 ,100 - - --
392.407--
(1.173.3N) — -------- - - -_ --
I" �I
55
to 5' - r
.- e
CONVERSION TO YEAR
0
0
1994
2,128,363
2,096,600
31,763
(1,141,554)
1995
2,171,048
2,321,200
(156.152)
(1,297,706)
1996
2.215,013
2,719,650
(564,637)
(1,862,343)
W
1997
2.260,298
2,728,925
(468,627)
(2,330.910)
1998
2.306,941 -
2.708,550
(401,609)
(2.732,579) - - - -- - - - -- -- -- - - -- --
1999
2.354.983
2.626,050
(271,067)
(3,003,646)
4Y
2000
2,404,467
2,590,350
(185,883)
(3,189,529)
2001
2.455,435
2,653,900
(198,465)
(3,387,994) - - -
2002
2.507,932
2.535,950
(28.018)
(3,416.012)
4✓
2003
2,562,004
2,411.450
150,554
(3.265,458)
---2004
2.617.699
2.590.750
26.949
.-
2005
.2,675.064
2,530,250
144,814
(3,093,695)
4V
2006
2,734,150
2.364.000
370,150
(2.723,545)
- 2007
2,795,009
170,000
2,625,009
(98,536) - - --
4✓
2008
2,851,693
170,000
2,687.693
2,589.157
2009
2,922,258
170,000
-
2.752,258
5,341,415
- ---- -- -- - - -- -
I
r
� I
LI
vI:I
r!
I
I
I,
I.
M
1
I::
'
v
I ICI
id
I
S/l
•
. 9
Remaining T.I.F. (Hedberg)
r.
Outside T.I.F. in Edina (Hedberg)
Total Hedberg land in Edina
Outside T.I.F. in Edina (Decourcy)
Total land in Edina
Hedberg land in Bloomington
Total Hedberg land
TOTAL VACANT LAND
30.03 acres
53.89 acres
83.92 acres
8.29 acres
92.21 acres
2.6 acres
86.52 acres
94.81 acres
•� ,
�i
ei
/It ,
cr
O
�1 t� \1 -1 + \ /� // 1/ /_\ I
�� 1 � ��- \I //i l\ / 1� /; /\1 / r
�l=
•° 1! v/\ \, �\1 EDEN V/91Cat
t /% /'/ �// /\ \/i /1+1/1 / 1 I/
/.. ADD. o
N •••
fss•SS, is
1
PARKLAWN AVE. +��°4K'_
! iMN AVE.
1; 1�_;` `/ /; / /tl /I �1 /1/ 't0 +2d0 •� !:/lO -- _
`�
W //� /f!!� i� ►/� T.I.F.
Hedberg
1.01 30. 03ac i
1
a
/_dill /��
/ \ � / —� / / :tie•sc is [ � .. e
1 /-
! v
t� / ♦/ \�� / \/
/ Other = w 3
�• � / 1 J :
Hedberg
°r �!
;,' 1 53.89ac >;i �, q a I 3� �t •:
1\ / —r
Ic
t� 3 /9'sr +27ew '•r j�s i
M..' WEST s -z.r_
11
cj
01" de
ee
t Zi� \/ /ter/
oo
Sri
ZI
' /( \ /` // �'� /`j / / +j I tI� \ -1/ / +1 /\ I• try::: e• e i
•1, / %t�= °°y,i j /1/I Other j!t ; ��� \/, �I` \�• e
/.� /` \ IDecourcy ► i
�,I \ `1 'lo �p •,.Je
8.29ac �/� \.�� ♦1�; "� 10 s
/ .1 I
y
.w7: ;- -.d' -iir. _ •�:.��r•
•.�..;ti.:•:•;{; T}hi; }:;:,• 'r,. .... ^_ _ —O�OUG
�. l!•i,`�i I•f•_�.
- •.,• +,��
J.
Blmgton•
Hedberg
'i; ' =r :
vim' .. cOrM°
sj
• ADD.
2. 6ac
,.,�;
I'..,v....•' `' " ►-``
°f
�.:�•
2ND
f,
••
KEN I
it C
VII.C.
c
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291- 6359/TDD 291 -0904
DATE: November 3, 1986
TO:. 1 -494 Project Management Team
FROM: Connie Kozlak
SUBJECT: Vacancy Rates Applied to Land Use in Estimating 1 -494 Corridor
Employment
After the initial attempts to estimate existing and future employment from
building area devoted to commercial ,industrial and.office uses, it was decided
to apply a vacancy rate since 100% occupancy is never achieved. This would
result in lower (and presumably more accurate) employment estimates. The
following assumptions were used for vacancy rates. The attached table shows
the revised numbers.
Existing Land Use
The Towle Real Estate Company annually prepares vacancy rates, determined
through surveys, of office and shopping center occupancy in the Twin Cities.
For existing land use their Spring, 1986 estimates were used. Office occupancy
in the southwest quadrant was broken down by city in the Towle Survey so each
city's vacancy rate was used. For commercial use the southwest quadrant
average vacancy, 3.6 %, was used for all cities.
Future
UMMUMMMW
B. Senness asked several developers and real estate people their opinions on
office vacancy rates 20 -30 years hence. The results were:
Don Ankeny, Trammel Crow: Developers tell lenders they expect 3 -5% vacancy,
but they usually figure their costs asssuming an 8% vacancy rate.
Boyd Stofer, United Properties: He said since there will always be new
buildings completed and on the market the first few years with a high vacancy
rate figure 15% overall.
Bill. Reiling, Towle Real Estate: He said 10% vacancy should be assumed for the
future. He also suggested we calculate future development based on a 5% annual
compounded growth.
I also asked Dick Pratt. He said they were wrestling with this question in
Dallas and concluded that developers of office space have been building a lot
more on speculation the last 10 years resulting in the highest vacancy rates
ever. The recent past vacancy rates cannot be sustained over time. Over the
20 -30 year horizon he thought rates of 8 -10% should be assumed.
b.
We therefore decided to assume 10% vacancy for offices. Commercial vacancies
are generally lower and more stable so 5% vacancy was assumed for future
commercial uses.
Action Requested
That the Project Management Team adopt the population, household and employment
figures shown on the attached table under the columns "2010 L.U.'Forecast" for
use in the initial traffic forecasts.-"
DPF274
Revised November 18, 1986
Table 1.•
I -494 STUDY
FOR TATS WITHIN STUDY AREA
Bloomington
38,180
EMPLOYMENT
POPULATION
HOUSING UNITS
1970
1980
51,393
49,044
49,938
Adj.
Adj.
1980. 2010 2010**
1980
2010
2010**
1980 2010 201096
Full
Full
Regl. 198669 Reg11 L.U.
I
Regl.
198666 Regl.
L.U.
Regl. 198696 Regl. L.U.
11980-
Empl.
Empl.
Fore- L.U. Fore- Fore-
Fore- 1980
L.U. Fore-
Fore-
Fore- L.U. Fore- Fore-
Bloomington
38,180
48,836
54,522
61,482
789'097
129,931
51,393
49,044
49,938
54,435
51,253
17,612
18,835
18,419
22,500
21,402
Eden Prairie
2,961
12,446
10,292
16,461
38,873
61,700
9,899
10,066
22,422
34,904
40,436
3,531
3,479
8,111
12,747
14,860
Edina
18,556
27,907
33,879
29,068.
47,440
45,033
23,447
24,449
31,348
26,468
33,721
10,111
9,692
12,815
11,572
14,668
Minnetonka
1,661
6,788
3,964
11,395
20,400
20,000
13,017
10,569
15,150
+3,814
18,043
3,308
3,342
5,518
4,753
6,928
Richfield
10,328
11,000
13,601
7,185
14,500
14,615
37,689
37,582
37,106
37,000
37,785
15,142
15,386
16,089
16,000
16,456
TOTAL `21,686 106,977 116,258 125,591
199,310 271,279
135,445 131,800 155,964 166,621 181,238
49,704
50,734 60,952 67,572 74,314
REGIONAL TOTAL 851,397 1,109,141
1,522,500
2,118,222 2,500,000
807,618 1,010,000
1,069,030
1,522,500
1,985,873 2,500,000
721,357
1,010,000
Study Area % of 8.4% 10% 11.3%
13.1% 17.8%
6.6% 7.4% 6.7% 7.2%
6.9%
7.5% 6.7% 7.4%
Regional
*This study area increase of 164,302 jobs (1980 Full Empl. Estimate - 2010
Land Use) equals 365 of total regional increase in
employment of 453,470
(1980 Full Employment Estimate - 2010 Forecast).
**These columns derived from municipal land use data,
(including vacancy
rates); other columns from Metropolitan Council data.
2010 is the same as ultimate for all municipalities
except Bloomington
which projects an ultimate
land use resulting in 162,922 employees.
(Ise s �uc�a ; ✓1��L�
PrS
DPF243
t
VI.0
REGIONAL TRANSIT BOARD
Suite 270 Metro Square Building, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
292 -8789
0
DATE: November 18, 1986
TO: I -494 Project Management Team
FROM: Katherine Turnbull, Planning Manager'
SUBJECT: I -494 Transit Work Program
Action Requested:
That the I -494 Project Management Team approve the transit work program
contained in this memorandum and the participation of Richard H. Pratt, Richard
H. Pratt Consultant, Inc., from Washington, D.C., in the I -494 corridor study
in an amount not to exceed $10,000.
Background:
On Friday, October 17, the agency staff working group, consultants and staff
representatives from each community participated in a transit working session.
The purpose of the one -day session was to review past and current transit
studies affecting the I -494 area, identify the major transit issues associated
with the corridor study, reach agreement on the major transit capital
investments for consideration in the study, and develop the approach to be used
in addressing and resolving the transit components. Minutes summarizing the
key points of the session will be available at the next PMT meeting.
A majority of the day was spent discussing the different elements to be consi-
dered in the transit and-travel demand management element of the plan. It was
agreed that the outcome of these activities should be a preliminary transit
network for improvements to bus services in the corridor, a set of travel de-
mand management (TDM) strategies and a model travel demand management ordinance.
It was also agreed that, given the results of the Metropolitan Council's Long
Range Transit Study, the major transit investments to be considered should
include preferential access /rider services and high occupancy vehicle (HOV)
facilites.
To accomplish this, a work program was subsequently drafted by the staff work-
ing group. The major tasks of this work program are outlined below.
Transit and TDM Work Program
1. Develop a listing of all potential TDM and transit strategies and concepts
for consideration in the corridor.
2. Review use of TDM and transit measures in other areas of the country, with
special emphasis on what has and has not worked. This will include review
of strategies used in other Midwestern cities and throughout the country.
I -494 Project Management Team
November 18, 1986
Page 2
3. Estimate the costs and effectiveness of the different TDM and transit
strategies given local and national experience.
4. Assemble package of measures which best meets the needs and solutions for
more detailed analysis and specific application to the I -494 corridor and
develop a set of evaluation criteria for selecting the most appropriate.
5. Identify those strategies which involve or would benefit from special
facilities or other capital improvements.
6. Develop conceptual designs and costs for each measure in the I -494
corridor. This will include a three -step process to design the transit and
TDM strategies and facilities needed to support these. The three step
process will include: design of the TDM strategies, conceptual design of
transit plans for the corridor and conceptual design of the supporting
capital and physical facilities.
7. Evaluate and select the specific package of strategies which are estimated
to be the most effective.
8. Develop a model TDM ordinance for consideration by communities within the
I -494 corridor.
9. Include the transit and TDM strategies, model ordinance and special
facilities into the final report and design plans for the I -494 Corridor
Study.
The results of this process will provide a set of coordinated and comprehensive
transit elements for the I -494 corridor. These. will be flexible rather than a
set, rigid plan to respond to future needs in the area.
KT:jmo
Attachment
TOTAL OPERATING AND CAPITAL COST /RIDER
DAILY RIDERSHIP
ALL
BUS
PREF.
ACC
HOY
EXCL. -
ROW
HOY
SHARED -
ROW ARTIL
HOY
SHARED-
ROW.FRWY
LRT
ARTERIAL
LRT
RR
\`, LRT
`,FREEWAY
AGT
2,500
$2.17
92.76
$8.33
$5.20
$20.47 _
$16.80
L3.74
'„ $22.50
$49.13
5,000
_..._1.73
2.15
5.04
2.73
11.40
8.69
,` ;i 7.31
`
„11.75
24.94
7.500
1.59
1.92
3.88
2.39
8.13
5.98 -[
5..17
8.16
16.88
10,000
1.57
1.79
3.8U
2.01
6.55
4,63
4.16
6.37
12.85
12,500
1.56
1.69
3.05
1.86
5.50
3.82
3.45
5.30
10.44
15,000
1.51
1.71
2.81
1.77
4.88
3.28
3.02
4.58
8.82
17,500
1.52
1.62
2.68
1.72
4.36
2.90
2.72
4.07
7.67
20.000
1.49
1.60
2.57
1.63
4.07
2.61
2.49
.3.69-
6.00
22,500
1.49
.1.59
2.48
1.57
3.81
2.40
2.33
3.40
.6.17
25,000
1.50
1.54
2.39
1.55
3.54
2.23
2.20
3.17
5.67
27,500
1.48
1.56
2.35
1.54
3.38
2.09
2.09
2.99
5.25
30,000
1.48
1.54
2.30
1.51
3.21
1.99
2.01
2.84
4.91
32,500
1.45
1.52
2.24
1.46
3.09
1.89
1.93
2.71
4.61
35.000
1.44
1.52
2.22
1.43
3.01
1.81
1.87
2.60
4.36
37,500
1.45
1.50
2.18
1.44
2.90
1.73
1.81
2.50
-4.15
40,000
1.41
1.51
.2.15
1.41
2.82
1.67
1.76
2.42
3.96
42,500
1.42
1.49
2.12
1.40
2.74
1.61
1.72
2.34
3.64
45,000
1.42
1.49
2.09
1.37
2.68
1.56
1.68
2.27
3.57
Note: MTC guldel Ines for re- evaluating continuation for service on a specific route: When operating subsidy per passenger
reaches $2.45. Thus total operating and capital cost /ride at which service continuation Is re- evaluated Is as
follows:
Operating Subsidy $2.45
Revenue 0.65
Estimated Capital Cost /Rider 0.25
Total Operating and Capital Cost /Rider $3.35
PLANNING
TRANSPORTATION
ENGINEERING
ARCHITECTURE
BENNETT, RINGROSE. WOLSFELD. JARVIJ GARDNER, INC. • THRESHER SQUARE • 700 THIRD STREET SOUTH • MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 • PHONE 612/370 -0700
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 18, 1986
TO: I -494 Project Management Team
FROM: Richard Wolsfeld rl- tj
SUBJECT: Appropriate Transit Capital Investment Modes for I -494 Corridor
A study of Potential Transit Capital Investments in Twin Cities Corridors is
currently being completed by.the Metropolitan Council and BRW. The purpose of
the study is to determine which corridors have the greatest need and potential
for transit capital investments.
As part of the study, a table was developed that showed the relationship between
total cost (capital and operating /maintenance) per passenger and level of
ridership for various transit modes. The table is attached. The table serves
as a guide to indicate the cost - effectiveness of different modes at varying
levels of ridership. MTC guidelines for re- evaluating continuation for service
on a specific route is $3.35 total cost per rider. For the purposes of the
study, $3.35 was used as the threshold for considering a mode in a specific
corridor based on the corridor's forecasted ridership. For example, LRT on a
freeway right -of -way would require over 12,500 forecasted daily riders to attain
a total cost per passenger of less than $3.35 (according to the table). An AGT
system (Automated Guideway) would require over 45,000 forecasted daily riders.
A year 2000 patronage forecast for I -494 was prepared by the Metropolitan
Council and RTB staff. According to the their forecasts, transit ridership on
I -494 will be approximately 6,000 riders per day. Based on the forecast of
6,000 transit riders, preferential access (including rider support servic -es such
as park- and -ride lots, transfer facilities, bus pullouts, passenger waiting
facilities, etc.) is the mode most suited to the I -494 corridor. However, in
addition to the 6,000 forecasted transit riders, a High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)
application on I -494 would generate approximately 18,000 HOV passengers bringing
total daily ridership to 24,000. This forecast is sufficiently high to warrant
the consideration of HOV lanes on I -494. (Note: While the table indicates a
cost of over $3.35 for 24,000 riders on an HOV /Freeway Shared ROW, the cost is
based on 24,000 bus riders. With just 6,000 of the HOV passengers using buses,
total capital costs are reduced considerably. In fact, the total cost per
passenger would average $2.42.)
MINNEAPOLIS DENVER BRECKENRIDGE
PHOENIX
I -494 Project Management Team
November 18, 1986
Page 2
Conclusions
Potential transit capital investment modes most suited to the I -494 corridor
are:
o Preferential Access /Rider Services
o High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes
Further study conclusions indicate that the Minneapolis South and Minneapolis
Southeast corridors would best be served by Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Busways.
These modes would be directly connected to whatever transit service is provided
on I -494.
RPW /lp
VII.D.
Consent
Agenda
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland
FROM: Ceil Smith OAP�
SUBJECT: HOLIDAYS 1987
DATE: November 26, 1986
The following list of days are the proposed holidays for 1987:
Tuesday, January 1
New Year's Day
Monday, January 19
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
Monday, February 16
Presidents' Day
Monday, May 25
Memorial Day
Friday, July 3
Independence Day
Monday, September 7
Labor Day
Wednesday, November 11
Veterans Day
Thursday, November 26
Thanksgiving Day
Friday, November 27
Day after Thanksgiving
Thursday, December 24, one -half day
Christmas Eve
Friday, December 25
Christmas Day
Thursday, December 31, one -half day
New Year's Eve
These are the same holidays observed in
1986.
CS /sw
` VIII.A.
Consent
Agenda
M E M O R A N D U M
T0: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Ralph Johnson, Assessor ^'
SUBJECT: Tax Forfeit Lot
DATE: November 25, 1986
There is a vacant, single - family lot at 6809 Normandale Road, legally
described as Lot 9, except highway, Normandale Terrace, listed by our
office as exempt. The property was purchased off the tax forfeit rolls
in 1969 and forfeited again in 1973. In 1976, there was a division of.
the lot for highway. widening (leaving a lot approximately 95 x 245).
Upon inquiry as to the forfeit list "for sale" price, Hennepin County's
forfeit land department responds that the lot is not for sale because
the municipality did not release it in January, 1985. Edina's Public
Works and Park Departments express no need for the property and we can
recall no action by the City to retain it. Unless someone else can re-
call a reason for not allowing private ownership, we suggest a Council
resolution releasing it for sale.
R7 /jr
M
Ell
AYTON°COUR ROYCAR R •F:: ;
wEat• • ... !°._ SS,.� �n ::'��, °e�; •i. ..� o, ' • '0.° :.
2"a5• "•� : 4i°•,o< i! •. is ..a: p o �. :�E' :ei : °
SE�oNa D
, - ,'o` .�••,.;�33i p �t� _ "��f•. ;' �,Q �, p •� _ :, :,.��.:
:BJ � ,` �,�,j/.i � ;.. '_ \.. ,;; a wle ",•-. '••
�� r
N• I, I r` �y ~ •' �-. , — �2 8 � �W !/� ° v �b3 . SO __ — _— ?3 _ � ___ — - oso ` l
NORMANDALE , o =! e� r � - -�s -: — •i -- s e; : a - _a 2 o { sJ ' O P , p = ) . s� f �% , 4 •'o\ "s Y`fJt; •: � ��j� �j e . 6 � ' J5.��. . •, �t . • •'� 1 �0 • . .c ,, : �
S <"f
7
\
2, { n)z? TERRAC ,IQ JOH 5
REPLAT -,,, ;.4�t2 �1, , _
t .0
°o 5 °� was o— a: 3s , B, % j; 4 e
CD
rz
i.4� � Q- ,. r� r-a � v- 7�. I (p')� a ,,,, % zg Jam• I �'7.. V 6-�, i }.� (tl U •� o'y .•
Z �l, l se ;3915W ' s / ICQ� e "• "y o
e, 5`.
�, 3
r c S89 3e :5 W M17� 1 ..� % °i= ej (i0 :cl h'(ti.• rf \�•,� ° •o; a: of 4s
C O: a
i 4 a.. 4p• n,, ..h s' o
p ,
T $ HN Ell DER ND Z�� o Appv, s''
H1' ry
r i e A 6� T O '^ �� D I N A ��� 3 1 .��r �,A �.•��.y� `mss
c. Z 1 ( -L /� (� /
3. '8 IZ3 50 8850 . �% .S 50 �6 30'30 �q�° (/Lr 4 C *• `ome6 B: ` "° 'p0 /.
may- t189 °.:Z E �►� ° 20— 's'.s••' ao s �BS� `+±; q�1
T. 64.�a'• S�.!•
7
r• Es- :9 bo 33� •, .s;, s.d�
C .�S >o � a`7..� G I ° � L•.� <apQ C4 ', Y„ x...31° ,^ •Y
WM /� O ''9.0� fJ0 're RL3 ..� 1(\ O`•V7'��~ �7ti .
2' .r ,h..,'ti�•Ay��f. 21
[r ;
c^ l �y P.
3 4 r oi• i 7 /i/ •02
330 Itp ��1 •�, /� ,Bl. CK 6� wC
1\/,L� '05 �-. ol.r �p, •�� OJT •f I^ •��•t +; .i .E•
��,. r .. a. ��.
•Q �i f :+
�pQQ4 n OO I� 2 Ta r
• `5E CUR,SEC'4. 'S 5 5 +6 `= 5 oc
v �3J W 7 !h � — •�- --
0
cam ch
•r•ISPit � r
. ra .
or
AND t� _ '3 7
IX. A.
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION
Date Initiated November 13, 1986
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street Alley ® Utility Easement. -_
FlDrainage Easement F-10ther
(describe)
Description of area proposed to be vacated:
East 25 feet of Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 39, thence South to the Southeast
corner, thence West 25 feet, thence North to a point-25 feet West from the
Northeast corner of Lot 39, thence East to point of beginning, of Lot 39,
Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition.
Attach copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
q
Signature
5200 Gorgas Ave. S;.1
Address Edina MN 55424
Telephone 926 -9740
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER b;• E Acceptable .0 Opposed
Conditions
MINNEGASCO by Acceptable Q Opposed
Conditions
N.W. BELL by Acceptable Opposed
Conditions
Conditional
Conditional
aConditional
T
N.S.P. by Acceptable Opposed Lj Conditional
Conditions
to -33. -6
VV A
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received information on
a parcel of land in said municipality which became the property of the State
of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, legally described as Lot 9,
except highway, Normandale Terrace, PID 430- 028 -24 -33 -0094; and
WHEREAS, the parcel of land described has heretofore apparently been
classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota
as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has apparently heretofore been
authorized by said Board of County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board of County
Commissioners of this parcel of land described as non - conservation land,
be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of said parcel of land
be and the same is hereby approved.
ADOPTED this lst day of December, 1986.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 1, 1986, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 4th day of December, 1986.
City Clerk
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & City Council Members
FROM: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager 1::�E,
SUBJECT: POSITION DESCRIPTION AND MANAGERIAL OBJECTIVES FOR CITY MANAGER
DATE: November 26, 1986
Attached you will find the Position Description and Managerial Objectives
for the City Manager of Edina.
Tom Erickson has researched and confirmed the fact that a closed meeting
cannot take place in regard to the discussion of the City Manager's
salary for 1987. An effective method of handling this which has been
employed by other cities is to appoint a committee of two Council Members.
The other Council Members, and any other persons the Council desires to
be heard, can then submit their written comments to the committee. The
committee would review those comments, meet with the City Manager and
then prepare a report and recommendations to the full Council. The report
and recommendations then could-be discussed at the open meeting. So long
as the committee is comprised of less than a quorum of the Council, the
Open Meeting Law is not violated.
Please consider this method which would avoid the need to have the discussion
at a public meeting.
KER /sw
Attachment
POSITION DESCRIPTION
CITY OF EDINA
CITY MANAGER
OBJECTIVE
Plan and direct the administration of City functions as delegated by the
Optional Plan B and City Council to ensure efficient municipal services
and development in line with Council objectives.
SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES
1) Direct and control all line operations of the municipality. Works
closely with department managers to plan and coordinate activities
and follows up to ensure effective service to the public and
efficient conduct of all municipal affairs.
2) Supervise all staff functions of the City. Responsible for all
financial reporting, human services, labor relations, and all
other City functions.
3) Develop and ensure effective utilization of appropriate budgeting
and administrative planning and control procedures. Ensures that
proper control reports are developed and used, supervises effective
operation of purchasing procedures, etc. Recommends changes in these
procedures to the Council as appropriate.
4) Ensure the development of an effective municipal organization. In-
cludes recommending changes in organization structure as appropriate,
working with department managers to ensure effective job design and
utilization of employees, recommending staffing changes or additions,
and recommending salary treatment and employee development activities.
Follows up to ensure effective implementation of approved recommendations.
5) Ensure effective management and use of City assets. Includes directing
efficient use of present equipment and physical assets and recommending
additions or changes to the Council.
6) Ensure,effective management of financial assets. Responsible to the
Council to ensure effective investment of available funds and proper
accounting practices to control financial assets and provide for
financial planning.
7) Provide administrative support to the City Council. Prepares meeting
agendas, attends meetings to report on City affairs and problems,
presents recommendations concerning policies and objectives as well
as specific actions, participates in discussions as appropriate, and
implements Council decisions. Keeps the Council fully advised of all
significant matters and effectively presents all items which require
Council action or approval. Responsible for Council and City records
including minutes, and enforcing City ordinances and resolutions, etc.
s�
-2-
8) Ensure proper public relations. Follows up with all departments to make
sure that public services are efficiently provided and that all complaints
and public contacts are effectively handled. Participates in local
affairs as appropriate.
9) Stay abreast of developments in the public administration field and
cooperate with other governmental units and municipalities on matters
of mutual interest. Responsible for all City planning and development
activities and performs other functions as directed by the City Council.
10) Administer the affairs of the Manager's office effectively and in
accordance with Minnesota Law.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT:
1987 MANAGERIAL OBJECTIVES
DATE: November 26, 1986
The City of Edina has prided itself in being an efficient operation.
I think this should always be the number one goal of the City Manager.
Compared to other communities of our size, we have operated with less
staff and less administration. The public opinion showed that our
constituents want to continue this method of operation. This does
not mean that we should end up being simply a janitor of the system
but rather use all of our creative thinking to discover new ways to
administer inexpensively and to service with a high degree of
efficiency. Specifically, I would hope to accomplish the following
objectives during 1987:
1) To meet the goals and objectives of the Strategic Plan as brought
forth by the City Council.
The City Council for the past several years has been involved in
developing strategic goals and objectives, both short term and long
range. As in the past, we have been able to accomplish the short -
term goals that the City Council has set forth: We feel strongly
we would like to accomplish the goals set forth by the City Council
in the 1987 Strategic Plan.
2) To complete and publish the Employee Personnel Rules Handbook.
The last time this was formally changed and brought up to date was in
1972. I feel strongly that these rules and regulations should be
completed this year. Some of the rules and regulations may require
changes in the personnel ordinance which will require City Council
approval.
3) By year -end of 1987, to ensure that the new financial information
system be totally in place and all information reports be available
on a monthly basis to operating departments and City Council.
The Management Audit Committee indicated that we have a need to
update our financial reporting system. I am pleased to say that we had
already started the process in looking into such a system. We had
through Logis an historical bookkeeping system. The City of Edina
has challenged Logis to give us a different accounting and management
J
November 26, 1986
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
information system. Although we are the first community of the 26
to ask Logis to do this, we feel strongly that we should succeed
in getting the job done. Many of the systems should start January
1, and throughout the year we will be adding to and correcting the
system as we see fit to service the City of Edina.
4) To ensure that Edinborough Park opens properly and meets its commit-
ments of programming and operating costs.
Edinborough Park has received a great deal of publicity and promotion.
It is an exciting project for the City of Edina. Many of the concepts
that have been discussed during the last six to seven years will come
to fruition. It is truly a great challenge to make sure that all of
the programming thoughts and the management of programs be in place
to meet the Park's original objectives.
1986 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM
335009 11/20/86 119.70 ASTLEFORD EQUIP CO PARTS
119.70 •
++•+•+
' 335012
11/25%86
° 335012
11/20/86
REBUILD
CEN SUPPLIES
IPTION
12/01/86- PACE
10 -4680- 560 -56 A32065
25.95 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 88690
25.95 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 88476
25.95 AUTOMOBILE C_-- _ -CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 88458
77.85 •
••• -CKS
335013
11/20/86
107.67_
_ ALTERNATOR -
REBUILD
CEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44-
1159
-1171
335013
_ _
11/20/86
_
366.82 -
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
425.72
A 335013
11/25/66
169.89
ALTERNATOR
REBUILD
TOOLS
10- 4580- 560 -56
1182
11/20/86
148.20
6 CARLSON
REBUILD
-CEN _SUPPLIES
40- 4504 = 805 -90
1165
_3350.1_3
+°
_11/20/86
11/20/86
792.58 •
BURY
& CARLSON
- _�___
_._
10- 4524 - 645 -64
••••••
335041
11/19/86
1,457.07
BURY
A CARLSON
-
••• -CKS
° 335015 11/25/86 129.00 AT R-T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 628 -62
IZ ! - - - -- - -- 129.00 • - -- - --
Al �_ - 157.1
AAI s•+•s+ ••• -CKS
335033 11/19/86 78.80 BERCFORD TRUCKING - -- INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 1'
335033 11/19/66 171.60 BERCFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 _ �
335033 11/19/86 170.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING. INVENTORY 50- 46_26- 862 -86
- -- - 420.70 + 1•-°I
++• -CKS
a°
335026
11/20/86
425.72
'BADGER METER INC
-REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540-807-80
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 301 -30 25612
1 »j
335041-
425.72
BURY
6 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 301 -30
°5
335041
_11/20/86
11/20/86
1,828.30
BURY
& CARLSON
- _�___
_._
10- 4524 - 645 -64
�� °I
335041
11/19/86
1,457.07
BURY
A CARLSON
-
siiii•
i - _._._. __
-. __ -.
••• -CKS
=�
335059
1.1/20/86
34.20
A FARNHAM
CO
SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
10672
_
34.20 +
�33!
••••r•
- - -
- -- - - - -.. _. -, -.
-- - ---
- -•*•- CKS.
14-335031
11/20/86
29.92
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 540 -54
244214
;
11/20/86
BERTELSON_BROS_INC
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 - 54_244215
_____335031
335031
11/20/86
_36.94
14.95
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 140 -14
' ^I
335031
11/24/86
7.69
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLY
10- 4516- 180 -18
246340
3',
335031
11/20/86
25_36
BERTELSON
BROS_INC
OFFICE_SUPPLIES
___OFFICE
10-4516-510-St-244656
--
335031 __
- _ 1%
- 120/86
43.16
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
244657
i�
335031
11/24/86
33.79
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51
248339
,
191.83 +
Al �_ - 157.1
AAI s•+•s+ ••• -CKS
335033 11/19/86 78.80 BERCFORD TRUCKING - -- INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 1'
335033 11/19/66 171.60 BERCFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 _ �
335033 11/19/86 170.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING. INVENTORY 50- 46_26- 862 -86
- -- - 420.70 + 1•-°I
'- CKS . - -
1'
335041
11/19/86
1,457.06
BURY
d CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 301 -30 25612
335041-
901_.87
BURY
6 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 301 -30
°5
335041
_11/20/86
11/20/86
1,828.30
BURY
& CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 645 -64
�� °I
335041
11/19/86
1,457.07
BURY
A CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
40 -4524- 803 -80 25618
'- CKS . - -
1986 CITY
OFssImu
CHECK REGISTER
10-31-86
PACE e
'
CHECK -NO.
-DATE '
AMOUNT
VENDOR
O._#
MESSAGE'
-_-
.`
335041
11/20/8e
184.78
BURY mwmLomw INC
mLmmmTOe
40-4524-803-60
��
5,8e9.00L��'--_---____'_'__�-
---___--_'_-_
�-------
----
`
'
so*-Cmm
|
—335044
'---
1 i�'o9/w6-- '-------
150.00 -----
BILL omvsR FmmD--------REPwxR-_PwR-
' ��494_i-5�0-5WVtmox
-'
1,150' 00
^
*o*-oww
|'
_
_3350*7
11/e0/86
,*.ew
aRoww p*mTm_
wousRTxozwG
e3-4214-610-61
w*mesx
��
_
11�0�
10.70
�� ��
��Txas
��14�10�o-
---
'.
^.''.
ew'nm *
r-
...
�
/
��
..
-w�p***----------'
--
'----- --------�--
---------'------------
------�***-Cww--'
'
oosww� -
� ���es��a
��.wV
oumsSn mOmsmr
�ssTx G
10-430 6-440-44
'--
--
------- ~------
33.00
-------'-'------'---
-- --
-----------_'`
00*_oKm_
^ `
33sw5*
11/e0/66
17.90
BATTERY Wwnswouas
mspwzm PARTS
10-*540-560-56
637e5
11/20/86
13*.45
WAREHOUSE
pwmTw
10-4540-5e0-56
67100
'
335054
11/e0/86
____awvrseY
10e.15
BATTERY WwmsmwuSs -mspwzR
0-4540-560-56
7013e
~+
oosnsw
vo/en/ms
115.*4
BATTERY wwmsmmuos
pwnTm
10-46e0-560-56
69196
`.
-
o��m��
1o/2w/8�
48.72
. mwT�s�� W�ms�muws
p���m
��/---
' '-------'
- -----------
418.66 � -'-'-----
- - '--�--
---'-----''------'
'�����e����n-s�_�ywe�
*o~-CmS__
335060
II/E4/86
105. 09
AMBASSADOR mwmmwGE
omwmsmmxOwm
e7-4624-*64-66
-'
1059_�_______________________
***-owm
'-33506e.-
--
-----wwe.ww-'--BRoCK
--'---'oEN-SUPPLIs
11/e0/86
WHITE
0--4-50-4--3-43-30-1627
--'
^'
448.00 *
^�
-----'***-owa--
oosnas
_11/24/86
9.00suLLzewm
Cmwr Ssnw
10-1*ee-000-00
�~J
~�
o�snms
�o�ew�ma�-�-----�----1
_.sw
CwLLxG --''COw�
msRV
0-4200-4
--------�-----
'
,m.sw *
�
p�--°*�~��-'---------�--'--------'
�-----------'- ----'-----'--'
------'
--
°**-cma
`
,`,
^
�^�---'
3��
-'-'---
vo��w�
- - ----
�.�
�� m� ��s�
�C�z
� ^
'-------�227.ms-*-----------------------------
----
--� — --
`
^
'
335079
11/20/86
7.02
CATCO
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560-56
378438
-^
335080
11/20/66
148.13
CONT-MINN
SUPPLIES
27-4504-661-66
335080
11/20/86
74.51
CONT-MINN
CLEANING SUPPOEd
27Z4512Z661-66
m
C�
�
�
>rg
1986 OF EDINA
- CHECK NO. - DATE
.Z 335082 11/25/86
� p
_ •11111 __
I, 335090 11/20/86
335090 11/20/86
r I-
5 335091
335091
wI, 7,
_ 11/20/86__.__
11/20/86
CHECK .STER
10 -31 -86 eAGE 3
AMOUNT_- ____ -_
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
^�I
6;
_-
21335112_
1,309.62 •
_11/20/86
— 419.79 -
DAYTONS
2
HENS CLUB
27 -2237- 000 -00
335125 _
sz
_493'.50
;^
419.79 •
11/25/86
•tt -CKS
M..7
'
18.20 - - -
CONWAY FIRE 6 SAFETY
- - -- --
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42 87329
11/19/86
250.00
18.20
-- - --- -
- - --
,i
=+
-
11/19/86
25.00
___
• *• -CKS
11/19/86
•_�
••• -CKS
335125
335114
_
10.56
108.20
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 13565
_ 27.00- —_CERT
POWER TRAIN
-- RAN -
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56 13596
_ DELECARD
81.20 •
- TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56 49078.
11/24/86
z ^I
__•_93.22_
CITY_.OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 446 -44
I.1'.
45.30
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10 -4258- 646 -64
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
138.52 t
15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
-••• -CKS
s
^�I
6;
_-
21335112_
1 1 /20/86 —'
_11/20/86
— 419.79 -
DAYTONS
11/25/86
HENS CLUB
27 -2237- 000 -00
335125 _
sz
_493'.50
;^
419.79 •
11/25/86
340.00 -
M..7
335125
11/25/86
472.32
335125
11/19/86
250.00
GEN SUPPLY
_
335125
11/19/86
,i
=+
•t•tt•
11/19/86
25.00
___
335125
11/19/86
SUPPLY
••• -CKS
335125
335114
11/20/86
10.56
_ DELEGARD
TOOL CO
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
'
335114
11 /20/86 _ -
— 16.56 _
_ DELECARD
TOOL CO_
- TOOLS
10- 4580 - 560 -56 49078.
11/24/86
z ^I
I'
27.12 •
SUPPLY
CORRECTION
10- 4512- 540 -54
15395
- _ __ ___ __.
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SPLY
=�
••••••
17J'
MERIT
SUPPLY
CORRECTION
10 -4512- 664 -64
- -
-- •t• -CKS
•3i
335116
11/20/86
388.48
DIESEL SERVICE CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
i . l
'
33
-
- -- - - - - - - ---
-- - - - -_— __
388.48 •
^
•s• -CKS '
335120
11/20/86
427.50
DORSEY 6
WHITNEY
GOLF DOME
10- 1130- 000 -00 217215
a
'r
335120
11/20/86
10,858.93
DORSEY &
WHITNEY
LEGAL SERV
10- 4218- 220 -22 217215
I
lam--
-- - - - - --
---- --
11,266.43 t
-- • -.._ __ _�
s
^�I
6;
_-
335125
1 1 /20/86 —'
- 138-00-
MERIT
335125
11/25/86
340.00
"L—
335125 _
11/20/86 - --
_493'.50
;^
335125
11/25/86
340.00 -
M..7
335125
11/25/86
472.32
335125
11/19/86
250.00
GEN SUPPLY
_
335125
11/19/86
25.00-
MERIT
335125
11/19/86
25.00
___
335125
11/19/86
SUPPLY
12
��-
335125
_
11/19/86
__250.00
25.00-
MERIT
335125
11/19/86
25.00
15395
11/25/86
451 .50
-
_335125_ _-
335125 "
11%25/86
451.50 -
MERIT_
335125
11/24/86
499.60
s
6;
•tt -CKS �•
MERIT
SUPPLY —. ! —
BEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
15510
—i "'
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLKY
10 -4504- 318 -30
15629
MERIT_
SUPPLY •__,_•_,. - -,.
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 318 - 30_15591
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 318 -30
15612
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SPLY
10- 4504 - 647 -64
15644
.!
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 - 52_15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
15395
II'
I
MERIT_
SUPPLY—
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 540 - 54_15395
I'
MERIT
SUPPLY
CORRECTION
10- 4512- 540 -54
15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 540 -54
15395
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEAN SPLY
10 -4512- 664 - 64_15.
60.3
17J'
MERIT
SUPPLY
CORRECTION
10 -4512- 664 -64
731
MERIT
SUPPLY
TRASH CANS
10- 4602 - 644 -64
15630
7
-J
1966 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86
PACE 4
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV._• P.O. •
MESSAGE
- '
335125
11/20/86
437.25
MERIT SUPPLY
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
15477
t'
335125
11/20/86 _
495.00 --
MERIT SUPPLY
PARTS,
-4620- 560 - 5615509
335125
11/24/86
50.00 -
- —
MERIT SUPPLY
— _
CREDIT
_10
27 -4512- 661 -66
_
-14933----
- - - - - - - -- --
°
.
335125
11/24/86
108.62
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
27- 4512 - 661 -66
15396
335125
11/19/86
_ 449.05 _
MERIT SUPPLY
27- 4620 - 671 -66,
15604
335125
11/25/86
451.50
_ _ _PARTS
MERIT SUPPLY —
CLEAN SPLY
28- 4512 - 708 -70
15603
—
!
335125
11/20/86
155.40
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
15520
°
-- -
- -- -- - - -
- - -- 4, 830.24_ s
�'
_
ssssss
000-CKS
335136
11/19/86
1,083.10
EARL F ANDERSEN
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 264 -04
65266 —
- '
- —
`
1,063.10 s
it'
ssssss
_-•. — —._. ._—
_
--
--
-
- -*ss
- -I
.,
-CKS
335143
11/20/86
45.95
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
I_•
335143
11/20/86
_ _
67.71
_
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 664 -66
__
_
113.66 •
ssssss
sss -CKS
_
335148
11/25/86
— _ _ 4.53
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4504- 301 -30
335148
11/20/86
_ _
16.50 _
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY ----GEN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
_ - - - -- --
__,'
21.03 •
•�MSSS
-
*so-CKS
335150 _
11/20/86
- -
-- - 62.80 --ELECTRONIC.-CENTER
--
--
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 330 -30
419418
•
62.80
sss -CKS
`i
335164
11/20/86
3.31
FREEWAY DODGE INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
60609
-
-- .. ._
- - -- -- - --
3.31 •
ssssss
sss -CKS
335180 -
11/25/86 -
82,666.00
GENE RAL SAFETY EQUIP
FIRE EQUIP
10 -4918- 440 -44
13394
=
f.
"
82, 666.00 s
sss -CKS
^.
335183
11/20/86
-- 11.00
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS _
...
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 520 -52
68556
s
11.00
ssssss
s
— -
-
sss -CKS
335185
11/20/86
282.67
GOODIN CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
387054
_L-
335185
11/20/86
� 92.28 _ —
GOODIN CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
„Is
^�
335185
11/20/86
60.54-
COODIN CO —
CREDIT
40- 4540 - 803 -80
-
- -
t
335185
11/25/86
187.72
GOODIN CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 603 -80
391771
^'
502.13 s
sss -CKS --
_I'uiam
•
r ?I
1986 L OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE
r
ENDOR
3 335188
--
11/20/86
335188
11 /20/86
• ' 335188
11/20/66
335188
11/20/86
r el
CHECK h- -[STER
10 -31 -86 PACE 5
AMOUNTV
ENDOR
84.90
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NQ. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE
RADIO
SERV
10-4294-560-56-69916
80.44
_ CRAYBAR_.ELECTRIC-
11/25/66
CO__-
REPAIR
_PARTS_
10- 4540 - 540 -54 249499
441.67
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54 244827
9.49
GRAYBAR
ELECTRIC
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
124.81
GRAYBAR
- - --
ELECTRIC
CO
REPAIR
-
PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54 244879 �+
656.41
11/20/86
47.60
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
70015
335194 _
11/25/86 _
_ 24.80
GENERAL
-GENERAL
Ilo.
i,
RADIO
SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
71230
335194
11/20/86
KS
CASH
335194 11/20/86 100.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 420 -42 24308
335194. 11/19/86 - - _ 49.70- ..____ _ GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10 -4294- 440 -44 70728
335194
11/20/86
84.90
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
10-4294-560-56-69916
PETTY
335194
11/25/66
131.18
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
71231
335194 - -__
11/25/86.-
109.70
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO__SERV
11/25/86
10- 4294 - 560 - 56.71229
PETTY
335194
11/20/86
37.30
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
10- 4294 - 560 -56
70016
335194
11/20/86
47.60
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
70015
335194 _
11/25/86 _
_ 24.80
GENERAL
-GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS_
RADIO
SERV
10 -4294- 560 -56
71230
335194
11/20/86
72.50
CASH
COMMUNICATNS
RADIO
SERV
I0-:'_4294-_560_56_70305
PETTY
335194 11/20/86 19.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 24309
676.68 +
I -- -
IP
335203
335203
335203
rl 335203
335203
335203
31 335203
335203
335203
335203
335203
335203
335203
335203
39l 335203
335203
�d1 335203
335203
11/25/66 -
3.60 -� -
- PETTY
CASH -
CONF EXP
10 -4202- 140 -14
11/25/86
2.70
PETTY
CASH
PARK 6 MEETING
10- 4206 - 120 -12
__- 1t/25/86
29.61
i
PETTY
-PETTY
CASH.___- ,_..
�- V PARK 6.MEETINC
10 -4206- 140 -14
11/25/86
26.65
°.0 ' 335209
CASH
PARK 6 MEETING
- - 10- 4206 - 200 -20
11/25/86
1.47
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 160 -16
____ -_ _11/25/86 __.__
____ __6.72_ -
-
_ PETTY
CASH
-!
10- 4208 - 180 -18
11/25/86
5.56
PETTY
CASH
---MILEAGE
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 200 -20
11/25/86
8.14
PETTY
CASH
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 140 -14
11/25/86 -
_ 8.81
PETTY
CASH _ _
-
_ POSTAGE
10- 4292 - 627 -62
11/25/86
4.48
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 140 -14
11/25/86
9.99
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 500 -50
_ 11/25/86_ -
- 16.81 _
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 600 -60
11/25/86
45.77
PETTY
_
CASH
_
^SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 627 -62
11/25/66
87.11
PETTY
CASH
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 140 -14
-_ 11/25/86
-
4.45
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 520 -52
11/25%86
2.85
PETTY
CASH
SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 600 -60
11/25/86
5.56
PETTY
CASH
MILEAGE
40 -4208- 800 -80
--11/25/86 -- -
• - -
^ 10.75 -
_
PETTY
-_--_-
CASH
-
POSTAGE
40 -4290- 800 -80
281 .23 �
_ - - -
- --
+++ -CKS
h.
I
i
�� + ++++•
+ ++ -CKS �
°.0 ' 335209
11/20/86
38.13
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
899673
t
335209 !
11/20/86 -_
14.47 __
GENUINE
PARTS
PARTS
10-4S40-560-56903063
335209
11/20/86
115.45
GENUINE
PARTS
-.REPAIR
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
900742
- I'j•
7- 335209
11/20/86
16.06
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
903705
335209
11/20/86
_- _31_.,73
_GENUINE
PARTS__
_. REPAIR
-
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 - 56.898832,-
'____________ �^'J
iI1,
-_-'___'335209
IV
11/20/86
12.07
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_„__-
901072
335209
11/20/86
3.55
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
901053
`71
335209
11/20/86
4.36
237.82
GENUINE
PARTS
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
899146
h�
ld7
+ ++ -CKS
i
••• -CKS �,,.
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86
PACE 6
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT --
-_ _VENDOR _-
_ ^- _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0
MESSAGE
_ a
_335214
11/25/86
10.95
TOLL COMPANY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
034679
IT.
4�
335214
11/25/86
33.79
TOLL COMPANY
-- -
WELDING SUPPLING
10- 4610- 560 -56
471106
_
335214
11/25/86
75.45
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610- 560 -56
702824
_
335214
11/25/86
6.00 _
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
10- 4610 - 560 -56
035238
�•
335214
11/25/86
65.83
TOLL COMPANY
'— _
WELDING SUPP
10 -4610- 560 -56
468224 -
'
335214
11/25/86
105.38
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPP
10 -4610- 560 -56
703103
335214
11/25/86
_ 122.72
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPP
10 -4610- 560 -56
295658
•
335214
11/25/86
60.24
TOLL COMPANY
_
WELDING SUPP
-10- 4610 - 560 -56
_
393752 -
_
335214
11/25/86
67.68
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPP
10- 4610- 560 -56
296375
335214 _
11/25/86
_ 18.82
TOLL COMPANY
WELDING SUPP
10 -4610- 560 -56
294443
335214
11/25/86
_
28.43
TOLL COMPANY
_
GEN SUPP
40- 4504 - 801 -80
035264
335214
11/25/86
22.14
TOLL COMPANY
GEN SUPP
40 -4504- 801 -80
035969
_335214
11/25/86
- - 26.26
TOLL COMPANY _
-
GEN SUPPLIES
40_4504- 801 -80
036278
643.69
_ -
- --
335215
11/20/86
-
_ - _ - 52.19
- --
HIRSHFIELDS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
52. 19, ip
- - -
- - --
--
- -- -- --
- - -- - _.- - - -
-- -- --
_. --
-- •rs -CKS
_
335218
11/19/86
1,538.90
HALLMAN
LUBRICANTS
10- 4618- 560 -56
27547
--
- - - - -- --
-- -- 1,538.90 •
'
-
•st•ss
•s• -CKS
335222
11/20/86
- 79.97
HEDBERG 6 80N8
CO -��-
GEN SUPPLIES �
40- 4504 - 803 -80
32262
.
335222
11/20/86
11.32
HEDBERG 6 SONS
CO
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 803 -80
31657
91.29 •
_I,?�
ss•s••
ss• -CKS
335228
11/19/86
2,182.87
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
-10- 4540 - 560 -56
-
_
335228
11/19/86
7.16
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4580- 301 -30
-
335228
11/19/86_
_ _ 24.45
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4580 - 560 -56
335228-
11/19/86
630.88 -
_
HILLSTROM AUTO
SUP Y
REPAIR PARTS
10= 4620 - 560 -56
-
2,845.36 •
i.
srr -CKS
335231 -- - --
11/20/86
56.38
- ' - - - -41
HOFFERS INC
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 642 -64
335231
11/20/86
.SO----"-
- HOFFER8 INC --
- -----PAINT
- - - --
10- 4544 - 642 -64
33974—
-- - --
- ,.�,�
98.18 •
•ss -CKS
335244
11/20/86
112.36
HAYDEN MURPHY
-
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
112.36 •
- -- -
-- - --
-- - - --
•,!
sss•s•
CKS
335248
11/20/86
139.08
HARMON CLASS
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
125251
139.08 •
'
•w••••
14I
••• -CKS �,,.
1986 L_ . OF EDINA CHECK n_.1STER 10 -31 -86 eAGE 7
I
_CHECK- NO, -DATE _^ AMOUNT _
13 _- _335253 11/25/86 -__- 26.50 _
335253 11/20/86 34.00
60.50 r
-- r�i•r• - - - -- - - --
_ 335267
335277
335278
335279
335279
335279
.'I 335279
335279
335279
335279
! ;' 335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
__335279
335279
"i 335279
3� 335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
335279
+-I rrrrrr
335286
335286
•',�'� rrrrrr
s' 335292
�I
191.00.-
191 . 00 r
11/20/66 407.25
- - -- - -- -
407.25
so*-CKS
07 _ �5
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE
HUMPHREY_RADIATOR_- CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 _.
HUMPHREY RADIATOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
rrr -CKS "I
IBMCORPORATION SERVICE CONTRACTS 10-4288- 510 -51
I-
_ rrr_ -CK_S_ _
CARLSON PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600 - 510 -51 36561
11/24/86
6.15
JERRYS
FOODS
OWN
CONCESSIONS
27-4624- 664 -66
10 -4504- 470 -47
11/19/86
6.15 •
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
11/19/86
38.12
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 133 -12 „I
11/19/86
- .__9.1,7
JERRYS
-OUR
OWN
_HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 160 -18
11/19/86
29.43
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 260 -26
11/19/86_____. _
11/19/86
26.74
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
171.24
JERRYS
66.55-
! JERRYS
OUR
DUN
HDWE
CORRECTION
10- 4504 - 322 -30
JERRYS
11/19/66
6.55
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4504 - 322 -30 -
11/19/86
66.55
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
I --
__-- _11/19/86 __-
__-- 51.15JERRYS
REPAIR PARTS
OUR
OWN
HDWE__.__ „_
-GEN SUPPLIES
OUR
OWN
11/19/86
20.06
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 470 -47
11/19/86
5.29
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
11/19/86 _
8.06
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE ___
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504-507-50
11/19/86
16.76
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
_
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 540 -54
11/19/86
18.20
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 560 -56
11/19/86_____. _
6.88_
__JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 624- 62- _ - -___ _
11/19/86
171.24
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
11/19/86
5.69
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 660 -66
_ 11/19/86
__17.76
_JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PART.;
10- 4540 - 330 -30
11/19/86
41.73
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
_
10- 4540- 390 -30
11/19/86
37.60
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 520 -52
_`.11/19/86
28.00
JERRYS-OUR-OWN
HOWE
REPAIR _PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
11/19/86
17.98
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4544- 646 -64
11/19/86
13.89
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4604 - 260 -26
._____11/19/86. -�
33.80 _
JERRYS
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
11/19/86
4.98
_OUR
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
11/19/86
2.37
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES
50 -4504- 841 -84
---- - - - - -- -
611` 45 i- - -
--
1 1/20/86
11/20/86
11%19%86
1.7
rrr -CKS
68.40 JUSTUS LUMBER 6EN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 41287
43.45 JUSTUS LUMBER GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 40056
i 1 1 .85 • �a„
1,151.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10- 4260- 510 -51 "
1,151.00
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
REGISTER
ITEM DESCRIPTION
-1
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
" •rrrrr
11/20/86
- 473.97
335304
11/25/86
379.13
335304
11/25/86
22.80-
- 335304 -
11/20/86 --
- -- -" 119.96 - --
., ^� 335304
11/25/86
462.37
335304
11/20/86
92.85
335304
- 11/20/86
67.19 -
335304
11/20/86
51.99
335304
11/25/86
159.42
335304
11/25/86 -
71.58 - --
. 335304
11/25/86
71.58 -
335304
11/24/86
`-
11.03
335304 " -
-
-" 11/24/86
- - - " 90.69 - -
335304
11/24/86
42.77
335304
11/20/86
4.99
335304
__
11/20/86
_
230.37
. ^ 335304
11/20/86
14.43 -
335304
11/20/86
35.84
335304 - -
- 11/25/86 J --
71.58 - --
335304
11/24/86
29.76
_ ___ _••,
KNOX
1,812.71 •
�- rrrrr•
CHECK
REGISTER
ITEM DESCRIPTION
10 -31 -86 PACE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE '
7; _
335317
11/20/86
- 473.97
�10-
PRODUCTS -
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
4540 - 520 -52
486374
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
CREDIT_
PRODUCTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
486353
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
_ _
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
466236 1'
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
486351 I;,
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
466516
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARTS _
_
10- 4540 - 540 -54
466668 -
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARATS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
466525
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
_ REPAIR
PARTS
_10- 4540 - 560 - 56.486350
_ ___ _••,
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 661 -66
486340
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
CORRECTION
10 -4540- 661 -66
486340 I,..
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
-__ ___ LUMBER
10-4604-646-64
486273
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
100.00 -
10 -4604- 646 -64
486429 _ =,
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
LUMBER
11/20/86
10 -4604- 646 -64
486271
CONT REPAIRS
LUMBER
CO__
^
335337 _
10- 4604 - 646 -64
466955
-_KNOX
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
-LUMBER
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 - 64
_ _
486452
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
CREDIT
- _
10- 4604- 646 -64
038399
_KNOX
LUMBER
CO_____
-_ LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
486450
KNOX
LUMBER
CO.
REPAIR
PARTS
27 -4540- 661 -66
486340
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
PARTS
27- 4620- 661 -66
486269
�- rrrrr•
rrrrsr
7; _
335317
11/20/86
- 473.97
LAWSON
PRODUCTS -
CEN SUPPLIES
. 335317
11/20/86
391.86
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
335317
11/20/66
203.59
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
CEN SUPPLIES
335317
11/20/86
390.03
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
335317
11/20/86
43.44
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
335317
_11/25/86 _
275.76
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
335317
11/20/86
301.96
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
335317
11/25/86
128.93
LAWSON
PRODUCTS
PARTS
50- 4233 - 820 -82
2,209.54
335324
11/25/86
247.44
10- 4504 - 322 -30
10- 4504 - 328 -30
10- 4504- 646 -64
10- 4504 - 646 -64
10 -4620- 560 -56
10- 4620 - 560 -56 _
10- 4620- 560 -56
10 -4620- 560 -56
rrr -CKS
I
rrrrsr
rrr -CKS e
335324
- 11/25/86
1,014.95
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4228 - 160 -16
J
335324
11/25/86
1,582.07
LOCIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4230 - 160 -16
335324
11/25/86
_ 2,212.23
LOG 18
COMPUTER BILLING
10- 4233 - 200 -20
335324
11/25/66
, _
11755.22
_ _ _
LOGIS.
COMPUTER BILLING
_
10- 4233 - 420 -42
335324
11/25/86
1,701.87
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
40 -4232- 800 -80
335324
_ 11/25/86
_ 247.44LOCIS
-
-
COMPUTER BILLING
50- 4233 - 820 -82
335324
11/25/86
247.44
LOGIS -_-
COMPUTER BILLING
- _
50 -4233- 840 -84'
>
335324
11/25/86
247.44
LOCIS
COMPUTER BILLING
50 -4233- 860 -86
9,008.66 •
"'>
•rrrrr
rrr -CKS
335337
11/20/86
100.00 -
LAKE STATE EQUIP _-
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56 A14229
335337
11/20/86
61.50
LAKE STATE EQUIP
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56 514269
^
335337 _
- 11/25/86
- - --
191.20
LAKE STATE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 P13285
352.70 i
- - - --
-- -
- _
•rrrrr
>.IC
�1
___.
rrr- CKS
>'
1986 L . OF EDINA CHECK OSTER 10 -31 -86 ACE 9
___ _CHECK _N0._. DATE -_ —_
' 3353421_1/25/86
VENDOR
T
I2
327.92 —,_ -_MAC QUEEN _EQUIP -INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 70188 A
327.92 •
17
_ 335343
- -
_ 11/25/86- _
-- - --
89.96
—89.96 -*
— MINNESOTA
— - -- - - --
CLOVE -_
-- -
-_ CEN SUPPLY
— -
10- 4504 - 560 -56 9408 I ^!
—
J '
•
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
335362
e
335344
11/20/86
__ '-------1'36.30
41.56
MED OXYGEN
6 EQUIP
CONT REPAIRS
o.
,i
-4248- 440 -44
335344
11/25/86
MED OXYGEN
& EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
—10
10 -4274- 449 -44 — —
" 335344
11/25/86
31.23
MED OXYGEN
6 EQUIP
1ST AID SPLY
10 -4510- 440 -44 I,
MODEL
-- - --
- - - -- - - - -- --
209.09
•
00.000
STONE
—
J '
•
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
335362
11/20/86
517.00
-
335362 --
- -1 1 /20/86 — --
335346
11/19/86
184,061.90
11/20/66
MET N WASTE C L COMM
SEWER SERV
40 -4312- 801 -80
3586
-
�I
7-F-
335362
184.061 .90
•
T. 7
335362
11/20/86
967.21
-
141
- --
*0000•
- - - - - -- ------ -
- - - --
--
- - -- - - -
335379
11/20/86
--
335379
11/20/86
31 .50
3353.51 —
11/25/86
18.72
91_50 •
MILSCO ENGINEERING
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540- 390 -30
- I
16.72
+
^
335355
11/20/86
39.31
MINNSOTA BEARING CO
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 560 -56
- -
- -- - - - _ -•_-�
39.31
--- - - - - -- -
•
-� .—
_- .__— ____— _._- -- - - - - -- -
- - ----
- --
- -- - -- -
^�
0000••
'.._
335359
11/20/86
- 1,850.00
— MINN TORO INC _
- EQUIP MAINT
27- 4274 - 662 -66
637997
335359
11/24/86
181.92
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 670 -66
638204
_.
-_.. - --
--- - - - - -- ----
- - - --- 2,_031 - -92
� ----
- - - --- -- - - - -- - - - -
- -- -- ----- ..__...._.. --
---- - -. -- --- _.-
-- -- --- -- - - -- -- -
335360
11/25/86
34.00
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
064768
335360 —_
- 11/25/86
_ 4.30
MINNESOTA WANNER _
__CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 - 64_064720_
335360
11/25%86-
21.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 920 -s2
064763
MODEL
STONE
�--
59.80 •
10 -4524- 365 -30
00.000
STONE
—
J '
10- 4528- 314 -30
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
335362
11/20/86
517.00
-
335362 --
- -1 1 /20/86 — --
- 712.04
MODEL
335362
11/20/66
395.81
-4540- 540 -54
335362 - --
11/20/86
- -1
200.08 -
7-F-
335362
1/20/86
FONE
T. 7
335362
11/20/86
967.21
FONE
COMM
CEN SUPPLIES
3,013.89 •
%- ^,
0000••
335379
11/20/86
60.00
335379
11/20/86
31 .50
_� --
91_50 •
a ��
0000••
77I
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
10 -4524- 365 -30
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
CONCRETE
10- 4528- 314 -30
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
CONCRETE
10- 4528- 345 -30
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
J_ REPAIR PARTS_
10- 4540 - 520 -52
—10
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
-4540- 540 -54
MODEL
STONE
COMPANY
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
METRO
FONE
COMM
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 180 -18 228917
METRO
FONE
COMM
CEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80 227461
.- -_ - _.. - -- 17
••• -CKS
h,.
••• -CKS
IZ;
,:1.
••• -CKS
••• -CKS I.
- ••• -CKS
I�
-71
••• -CKS
I71
_ �7,
,,
`•••- CKS - `- 7 :11
7
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86
PACE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE -
AMOUNT- -
- - - -- VENDOR _
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. 0
MESSAGE—
s '!
335381_
11/20/86
167.40
STAR 6 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
r'..
__ _
335381 -
-
11/20/86
81.00
-- _ _ - _
STAR 6 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
40 -4212- 800 -80
. '
248.40
•
srsssr
iir -CKS
�!
335383 -
11/20/86
5,778.18
MPLS COMP TREAS
_ - - --
WATER
40- 4640 - 803 -80
5,778.18
_— -
sssrsr
rrs -CKS
335403
11/24/86
34.00
N W SOUND
PARTS
27- 4620 - 661 -66
56522
34.00
s
rrr -CKS
I=
•
335412
11/20/86-
73.44
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENTORY
23 -1209- 000 -00
128989
s'
335412
11/20/86
89.44
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23 -1209- 000 -00
129124
e
335412 _ --
-
11/20/86`—
- -- - -
203.39
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
-- -- -- -- -
INVENTORY SUPPLIES
23 -1209- 000 -00
128836
366.27
- - -
i
-- -
-,
- -- -
- -- -- - --
I.
*00-CKS
a'
335420
11/20/86
66.29
OLD DUTCH FOODS
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 664 -66
66.29
s
I
335421
11/20/86
208.30
OLSON CHAIN 3 CABLE
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 264 -04
64952
208.30
•
•i
rssrrs
004-CKS
;:'•
11/20/86
44.52
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12135 -
s 'I335452
335452
11/20/86
73.56
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
12144
e
-
- -- -.. - - - -
- - - - - - - --
- - - -- i18.08
• _ - - -- - - -- —
- - - - --
rrrrss
s++ -CKS
"t
335462
_ 11/20%86
55.00
- RENTAL EQUIP 8 SALES-
GEN SUPP
10- 4504- 646 -64
6104 -
- -
A
55.00
335465 _-
11/20/86
2,390.00
_- _RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 646 -64
6989
2,390.00
r
-- -
-
rrssrr
rrr -CKS
...
• ^�I
335484
11/25/86
94.70
AMERICAN SHARECOM
TELEPHONE
10 -4256- 510 -51
t
"
94.70
•
„!
s
ssssrs
so*-CKS
t
s
335486
11/20/66
172.50
DON STREICHER GUNS
PARTS
10 =4620- 560 -56
M357541
172.50
•
75t
•
1
1986 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
rrrrrr
335490 11/25/86
335490 11/25/86
rrrrrr
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
335492
rrrrrr
335494
= irrrsr
335499
CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -86 PACE 11
AMOUNT VENDOR - _ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.D. •_ MESSAGE
____.___
25.18 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
71.94 SHERWIN WILLIAMS
97.12
11/24/86
737.49
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
132.29
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
10.94
SOUTHDALE
_
FORD
11/25/86
93.09
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
8.48 -.
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/20/86
23.17
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/20/86
100.34
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/20/86
25.52
SOUTHDALE
FORD _
11/25/86
44.93
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
20.48
SOUTHDALE
FORD
li/es/86
._ 31 .31. --
__ _ SOUTHDALE
FORD ____•
_
11/25/86
14.61
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/20/86
158.32
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
105.29
SOUTHDALE
FORD
11/25/86
_
40.5t
SOUTHDALE
_
FORD
11/25/86
25.40
SOUTHDALE
FORD
- -
1 .572. 17
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
11/20/86 - 231.00
231.00 r
11/20/86 _ 72.00
72.00
GEN SUPPLIES
GEN_ SUPPLIES
CONT REPAIRS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARATS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR- PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REAPIR PARTS
REPAIR.PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
_ REPAIR PARTS _
REPAIR PARATS
REPAIR PARTS
SWEENEY BROS TRACTOR CONT REPAIRS
STATES ELECTRIC MFG..- _ _REPAIR -PARTS
rrr -CKS
40- 4504 - 801 -80
40 -4504- 801 -80
rrr -CKS
10 -4248- 560 -56 6507
_
10-4540-S60-S6 132331
10- 4540 - 560 -56 132699
10- 4540 - 560 -56 131969
___ 1 0 -4540- 560 -56 132191
10 -4540- 560 -56 129737
10- 4540 - 560 -56 131078
1074540-S60-S6.-130979---
10- 4540 - 560 -56 132167
10- 4540 - 560 -56 132160
10 -4540- 560 -56 131643 __-
�10- 4540 - 560 -56 132332
10 -4540- 560 -56 130980
10 -4540- 560 -56 _132160 ______
10 -4540- 560 -56 132054
10- 4540 - 560 -56 131535
rrr -CKS
10 -4248- 560 -56 22045
rrr -CKS
10- 4540 - 390 -30 78831
rrrrrr
000-CKS
335'194
11/20/86
266.25
GENERAL COMM�INICATZQ�g INC.
RADIO
SERV
10- 4294 - 560 -56
24307
335502
11/20/86
1.11
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
64874
335502
11/25/66
_
5.60
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS T
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_
66061
335502
11/25/86
203.04
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
65987
335502
11/20/86
.64_
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
_ 10 -4540- 560 -56
65050
335502
11/20/86
_ _
.82
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARi3
10- 4540 - 560 -56
65202
335502
11/20/86
415.57
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
65023
335502
11/25/86
12.79
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
66058
335502
11/25/86
4.35
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
65909
335502
11/25/86
21.34
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
65668
335502_
- 11/20/66
_- 374.85
__SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET___
REPAIR
.PARTS_
-10- 4540 - 560 -56
64336._,_.____
335502
11/25/86
46.41
SUBURBAN
CHEVROLET
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
65870
'••
- a9w-??
1,086.52
- 335503
11/25/86
68.21
--SUBURBAN-PLUMB
SUP
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4504- 390 -30
335503
11/20/86
22.58
SUBURBAN
PLUMB SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
1966 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO.
335503
3j 335503 _
335503
�r
R
335505_-
).wi 335505
DATE AMOUNT- — — _VENDOR
11/25/86
11/25/86
11/25/86
CHECK REGISTER
59.35- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
59.35
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
59.35 SUBURBAN _ PLUMB SUP
150.14 •
ITEM DESCRIPTION
NO. INV
10 -31 -86 PACE 12
CORRECTION 40- 4540 - 560 -56
REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 560 -56 ,
REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 80240 +�
e,
� I•
e
••• -CKS
11/19/86 - _'_145.02 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210- 140 -14 �
11/20/86 176.52 • _____SUN - - - - - -- ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 610 -61 L.
eu '
-I53-335539 11%20/86 104.60 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS 27- 4620= 662=66 1778
gz1 104.60 •
FA
;. ........ .....,....._ -. - - - -
••• -CKS
r
i
r
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
4T . 98 •
ffrf••-
--
--
•i0 -CKS
••• -CKS
335508_.
11/24/86 —
_ 6.16
8T
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440
- -. _. -- -----
I9,
_.. _ _ —_
-- - -
335508
11/20/86
15.39
ST
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
-44
10 -4504- 440 -44
335526
--
=+
2,468.00 •
TRACY OIL
335508
11/24/86
6.16-
ST
PAUL
BOOK
CORRECTION
10- 4504 - 440 -44
4J
un
335508 _
11/24/86
3.08—
ST
PAUL
BOOK
CREDIT
10 -4504- 440 -44
--
335508
11/24/86
6 .16
8T
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 440 -44
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80 62544
- -- -- --
335508
11/20/86
29.95
ST
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 540 -54
s�1
l =,L-_335508
11/24/86
18.06
8T
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES_
10- 4504 - 660 -66
39337
,
'I
335508
11%24/86
140.70
ST
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
16 -4516- 510 -51
.
335508
11/20/86
22.12
ST
PAUL
BOOK
OFFICE SUPPLY
10 -4516- 510 -51
335508
11/24/86
10.50 -__
_ST
PAUL
BOOK
CREDIT
27- 4504 - 660 -66
71480
�
335508
_
11%24/86
20.95
ST
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
2T- 4504 - 660 -66
39478
,
335508
11/24/86
9.95
ST
PAUL
BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 660 -66
370132
I
13.
249.70 •
;
••• -CKS
I
335512
11/25%86
45.36
$ T
ROBE
REPAIR PARTS
40= 4540 = 803- 80
-A2252
-
�Q,I
"1
45.36 •
••• -CKS
335516
11
eu '
-I53-335539 11%20/86 104.60 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS 27- 4620= 662=66 1778
gz1 104.60 •
FA
;. ........ .....,....._ -. - - - -
••• -CKS
r
i
r
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
4T . 98 •
ffrf••-
--
--
••• -CKS
.,
335525
11/20/86
471.95
3 M CO
SIGNS 3 POSTS
10- 4542 - 328 -30
-3 — . - - -
- -. _. -- -----
471.95 •
— - --
_.. _ _ —_
-- - -
,1-
335526
11/25/86
200.00
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
-- -- - - -- -- -
10 -4612- 560 -56 11022
1•'
335526
--
11/19/06
2,468.00 •
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10 -4612- 560 -56
11
�
. —._-
4J
•sfs•a
-- - - --
--
— - - - - -- — -
--
•s•- CKS__
.•'
°,
335537
11/24/86
802.00
802.00 •
TRI STATE DRILLING
_
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 805 -80 62544
- -- -- --
eu '
-I53-335539 11%20/86 104.60 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PARTS 27- 4620= 662=66 1778
gz1 104.60 •
FA
;. ........ .....,....._ -. - - - -
••• -CKS
r
i
r
1986 L_ . OF EDINA CHECK n__&STER 10 -31 -86 AGE 13
'71
- -- �s� +�« - - -
- - -- ------------- -
- - - - -- - -
-- -- - -- - - - - -- -
- 0
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE
PRINTING 2
23- 4600 - 610 -61 _- ,_ -____ _ !'•',�
f, 3
371.70 • _
Id
' 335541
11/20/86
99.92
TARGET
UNIFORM ALLOW
10- 4266- 420 -42 I,d
335541
11/19/86
15.36 _
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440_ -44
_
' 335541
11/25/86
17.96
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 446 -44
11/20/86 1
° 335541
11/20/86
85.90
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIER
10- 4504 - 520 -52
_11/25/86 1
335541
11/19/86
19.82
TARGET
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44
11/20/86 1
r, 335541
11/24/86
14.95
TARGET
INVENTORY SUPPLY
23 -1209- 000 -00
251.00 • '
253.93 •
''
,- -
- -- �s� +�« - - -
- - -- ------------- -
- - - - -- - -
-- -- - -- - - - - -- -
- 0
00+. -CKS— .,
z 3
335548 - _
_11/20/86 3
371.70- C
CITY WEST - P
PRINTING 2
23- 4600 - 610 -61 _- ,_ -____ _ !'•',�
f, 3
371.70 • _
_,
•����• s
sa* -CKS
�Z'I 3
335550 1
11/20/86 1
120.00 T
TISDEL STANDARD R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540 - 560 -56 12508
335550___ _
_11/25/86 1
112.30 T
TISDEL_STANDARD R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540 - 560 -56 _
�I _
335550 1
11/20/86 1
18.70 T
TISDEL STANDARD R
REPAIR PARTS 1
_12527
,.,.
251.00 • '
''
335551 -
- 11/20/86 -- 5
5,954.96 U
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED U
UNIFORM ALLOY 1
10- 4266- 420 -42
335551 1
11/20/86 6
664.55 U
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED U
UNIFORM ALLOW 1
10 -4266- 440 -44
L335551- 1
11/20/66_ -_ -, -
-- 1,408.25_UNIFORMS U
UNLIMITED A
AMMUNITION 1
10 -4572- 420 -42 -
S. 027.76 •
yl 335553 11/20/86 262.44 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
262.44 •
335569
-I� «* «fit•
"I
335572
�' do
s
11/20/86 402.68 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
402.68 •
•�s -CKS
REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540-520 -52 18796 ��.•
so*-CKS
GASOLINE 28- 4612 - 707 -70
"I
*sw -CKS
11/25/86__ __ - - -- 337.45 ---- VAN -PAPER CO _ - -_ PAPER -SPLY 1 -0 -4514- 520-52 29456
337.45 - - -- - --
i., 335573 11/25/86 315.24 VOSS
'71 335573 11/25/86 40.80 VOSS
335573 11/20/86 86.94 VOSS
335573 11/20/86 580.44 VOSS
... - - - -- - --- ------- - - - - -- 1, 023.42 -* - --
---..GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10499
GEN SUPPLIES i10 -4504- 322 -30 10860
GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540 -54 10419
GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 647 -64 10771
335575 11/20/86 10.82 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 026590
10.82 •
*r• -CKS
i7 1,
Y .3
••��CKS -
L71
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86
PACE 14
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. •
MESSAGE
'
i
335579
11/2S/66
_ - _ 36.14
- WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPP
104504-301-30
55381
z
335579
11/25/86
97.95
__
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
GEN SUPPLIES -
—10- 4504 - 646 -64
__
55195
335579
11/20/66
39.55
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
WELDING SUPPLY
10- 4610 - 560 -56
46990
I;
-
335579
-- - -
11/25/86
-- - - -- —
- —_ 94.20
_ WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
- - ---
PARTS
10 -4620- 560 -56
55038
�,
267.84 �
- - -- -- —
—
R I
of
III
"I
••••••
i
+•• -CKS .
'
335586
11/25/86
108.24
W W CRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
r
335586
11/25/86
286.26
W W CRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
335586
11/25/86
92.64
_
W W CRAINGER
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
-'
487.14 +
+•• -CKS i
335612
11/20/86_
1,358.36
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 314 -30
335612
11/20/86
444.99
_
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP
BLACKTOP
40 -4524- 803 -80
1,803.35 •
11 ,
335613
11/20/86
127.44
MCNEILUS STEEL —
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 540 -54
26690
-
335613
11/25/86
470.95
MCNEILUS STEEL
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
28984
�,..
598.39 •
-
••••••
••• -CKS
335709
11/19/86
12.50 - -
- T 0 Y M - — - - -- - --
ADVERTISING -- - -_—
50- 4214 - 820 -82
-
335709
11/19/86
12.50
T 0 Y M
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 840 -84
335709 -
11/19/86
12.50 -
-- T 0 Y M
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 860 -86
37.50 •
-- - - --
33
335710
- 11/19/86
- --
- 41.14
A PLUS PRESORT
_-
POSTAGE
10 -4290- 510 -51
41.14 •
-
335711
11/19/86
26.22
SYSTEM SUPPLY INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
710464
26.22 •
-- - --
- -- - - -- -
— -- --
- - -- -
'I -__
335712 --
11/19/86 —
507.60
SUN COMMUNITY DIR
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 820 -S2
of
335712
11/19/86
507.60
SUN COMMUNITY DIR
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 840 -84
-- -
�'
335712
11/19/86
507.60
SUN COMMUNITY DIR
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 860 -86
! "r
335713
11/19/86
1,960.00
FIRST COMPANY
DUE FROM HRA
10 -1 145- 000 -00
r
335713
11/19/86
860.00
-� —
FIRST COMPANY
- -- - - -- - - - - --
UNAPP SURPLUS
. .
66 -2490- 000 -00
ni
2, 820.00
'
335714
11/24/86
_ 7,016.00
EQUIPMENT
GASOLINE
-4612- 560 -56
9057
r
•
335714
11/24/86
2,531.00-
_WESTSIDE _
—� WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT -
GASOLINE
_10
10 -4612- 560 -56
8755
w!•",
335714
11/19/86
4,317.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
GASOLINE
10 -4612- 560 -56
8756r
_13.864.00 •
'I
335715
11/19/86
613.78
APPLIED POWER FLUID
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
67589
e
„ -
-- -- - - --
-
613.78 •
+Iz'�
335716
- --
11/19/86
5,350.00
RETTERATH RIGGING
GARAGE EQUIP
25 -4926- 540 -54
01032
I'_;�q
1
1986 L, OF EDINA
"1
CHECK NO. DATE
- 335717 -- 11/19/86 -
5
- 335718 - - - - -- 11/19/86
�e
°I 335719 11/19/86
335720 - -- - 1019/86
335721
335722 -
1211 -
-� 335723
-- -- 11/19/66-
11%19/86
11%19/86
CHECK b. _$TER
10 -31 -86 ACE 15
Y
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. • MESSAGE
-- - -- -PARK NICOLLET MED _
.�'
335726
11/19/86
270.00
PARK NICOLLET MED
5,350.00
+
_ DUES
295.60
,
- - 732.91
FIAHERTY EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 810-81
HENNEPIN TECH CTR
732.91
•
600.00
+
171.00
JEANNE ANDERSON
- AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180- 000 -00
I+i.
171.00
•
46.70
I.,I
72.24
WARREN 8CHNABEL
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
ROAD RESCUE
72.24
•
11/20/86
90.00
I;;'
- - --
195.00
- - - -- - -. - - --
LOUI8E KLEMP
- -- - -- - - -
AMBULANCE REFUND
- -�-- -- - -
10- 3180 - 000 -00
--
195.00
•
_335730
11/19/86. -
60.00
INTL SOCIETY _OF
195.00
HENRY BANCROFT
AMBULANCE REFUD
10 -3180- 000 -00
•
195.00
t ;
68.35 HUDSON
68.35 •
570.53 RAINBOW LEASING C0+ CONT 8ERV
570.53 •
- 335724 - 11/19/86 - - -- -- 40.85-
49.85 •
^� 335725 - - - -- 11/19/86 - - -- 108.45
108.45 •
10 -4200- 507 -50
C A THOMPSON - -- PRINTING 10- 4600 - 420 -AP 17965
ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO CABLE TV
-
335726
11/19/86 - - -
- -- 25.60
-- - -- -PARK NICOLLET MED _
.�'
335726
11/19/86
270.00
PARK NICOLLET MED
_ DUES
295.60
•
RUBBISH REMOVAL
335727
11/19/86
600.00
HENNEPIN TECH CTR
600.00
+
=A.
335728
11/19/86
46.70
TRI STATE CHEMICAL
46.70
• ___
335729
11/19/86
26.08
ROAD RESCUE
335729
11/20/86
90.00
ROAD RESCUE
116.08
_335730
11/19/86. -
60.00
INTL SOCIETY _OF
1' +r
60.00
•
335731 11/19/86 50.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY
50.00 • -
'1 335732 11/19/86 --
-
- - - 13.08 -
'= 335732 11/19/86
26.16
:�f�
39.24 •
' 335733 11/19/86
82.00 -
y�ae
82.00 +
PHY EXAM
PHY EXAM
CONF 6 SCHOOLS
10 -2149- 000 -00 A46099
10- 4246 - 420 -42
10- 4246- 440 -44
10 -4202- 440 -44 10197
•' 1
�i
T'
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 440 -44
1ST AID SUPPLYU
10- 4510 - 440 -44 14855
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
ry
_ DUES
10- 4204 - 440 -44
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10 -4250- 353 -30 12573
TC HOME JUICE COMP INVENTORY _ 50- 4632- S22 -S2
TC HOME JUICE COMP INVENTORY -50- 4632- 862- 86�-- _- __- ____._
ELLIOTT FILM'CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 627 -62
L14 l
1986 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO._DATE ___ _ AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER 10 -31 -86 PACE 16
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. • P.O. i MESSAGE
I'
�._`33s7a4�
11/20/86 _
_ 17.81
- J.H LARSEN ELECT CO
-
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 - 54_059675
17.81
•
-_
-_.
_ _ _-
_- .___ -____
263.87
CRESCENT ELECTRIC
-- - - --
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
'
263.87
i
Y
_
335736_.____
11/20/86
- - -- 130.00
RIDDLE CONTROL PROD
_ REPAIR PARTS
335737
11/25/86
_ 75.41
COPY DUP PRODUCTS
CEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 540 -54
675919
335737
11/20/86
75.00
_
COPY DUP PRODUCTS
__
CEN SUPPLIES
_
10 -4504- 540 -54
664877
- -
-
150.41
- --
335738 -
11/20/86 -- --
-- - - -- 120.00
_ AM PLANNING ASSOC-------
DUES
10 -4204- 120 -12
�--- �----- --
- - --�- - -
-
120.00
•
335739
11/20/86
36.00
W W GOETSCH ASSO INC
CEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504- 803 -S0
--
36.00
•
-'I
335740 --
11/20/86 - -
- 216.60
MILWAUKEE ELECT TOOL
TOOLS
10 -4580- 301 -30
'
216.60
•
335741
11/20/86
367.00
ESS BROTHERS b SONS
REPAIR PARTAS
40 -4540- 601- 80'A1903
- -- -
367.00
•
I
335742
_ 1 1 /20/86
112.75
-- --
- - ASHLAND CHEM - - - -• -
-CEN SUPPLIES -- - -� - --
10 -4504- 335 -30
-- - -- - --
-
112.75
•
335743
11/20/86
39.25
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
- 10 -4540- 560 -56
91249 -
-
_L,
335743
335743-
11/25/86
11/25/86-
3.45
WIN STEPHENS BUICK
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
92317
f
-_
- - 23.96
_ WIN STEPHENS BUICK-
REPAIR PARTS
104540- 560 - 56_92332
66.66
_ - _-
.-
y
335744
11/20/8b _
94.45
-
AFFILIATED SERV
-- - - -
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
If
94.45
•
--
335745
-- - - - - --
11/20/86
-
89.59_
LAND CARE EQUIP CO
REPAIR PARTS
10-450 ^560 -56
8P28
.oi
89.59
•
-- - -- --
-- _.. .
_335746
11/20/86
- - 319.20
- - -
STEWART LUMBER CO
- --
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1304- 264 -04
Id
319.20
*
_
335747
_ 11/20/86
9.00
_ -�
PERKINS RESTAURANTS -
REFUND
10- 2035_- OOO -00
'
9.00
•
_
_v - -
s
335748 _
11/20/B6
- --
-- 120.00
CHIEFS TOWING INC
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
'
120.00
•
--
r
335749
11/20/86 _
- 160.00
-
UNIVERSITY OF MN __-
- RECISTATION
10- 4202 - 440 -44
160.00
•
_ - -- ...
-
_
335750
11/20/86 ! -
- --
569.68
HENNEPIN COUNTY
- - - - -- -
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510- 440 -44
4653
569.68
i
--
- --
- - -
--
- - -
,�1__
335751
11/20/96
187.60
ANNETTE JUNIOR
SERVICES
23 -4100- 614 -6i
4
iii
1986 , OF EDINA
CHECK ASTER
CHECK NO. DATE __ -_- AMOUNT _ - _ -- - VENDOR
187.60 •
"I 335752 11/20/86 120.00 - HARRY HEIM -- -
120.00 •
335753 11%20/86 80.00 T EVIE HOLMQUIST
80.00 •
I'
335754 11/20/86 -- 315.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY'Y-
315.00 r
10- 31 -810AGE 17
ON
SERVICES 23- 4100 - 614 -61
SERVI
SERVICES
23- 4100- 614 -61
I10.
23 -4200410 -61-
186.81 r
°
335755
11/20/86
51.60
NATI AUTO PARTS CO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
304180
-
335755
11/20/86
3.60
NATL AUTO PARTS CO
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
304396
AM WATER WORKS ASSN
MEMBERSHIP
_.55.20
_ 11/20/66 __-
48.00
•
PLASTIC
p
335756
11/20/86
134.92
GARDNER HARDWARE CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
SUPERIOR
I'
�'
1.040.00
•
_
41168 -
134.92 •
335766
11/25/86
96.09
SUPERIOR
REPAIR PARTS
335757
11/20/86
178.88
JIM HATCH SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
6617
121_, 1.335757
428.99
_
173-._03
JIM HATCH SALES
TOOLS
11/20/86
6625____
"I
PARTS
ag'
351.91 r
11/20/86
_164.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
-_ -_ - - - --
'I
335765
- 335758
_ _11/20/86 -
40.43
TOWN d COUNTRY DODGE
--
REPAIR PARATS
10_4540- 560 -56
1285
302.00
•
40.43 •
--
=�I
rrrrrr
•r• -CKS
-^ ^I
335760
11 /Pe /fib
186 81
NN RA90TV recto
osoTC
10- 6
'
186.81 r
°
335761
11/20/86
109.00
DICK & RICK AUTO UPH
PARTS
=
`10 -45404-89 -68
-
109.00
•
11/20/66
78.17
335762
11/20/86
48.00
AM WATER WORKS ASSN
MEMBERSHIP
335766
_ 11/20/66 __-
48.00
•
PLASTIC
p
335763
11/20/86
1,040.00
RICHFIELD YARDS
CONSTRUCTION
"
SUPERIOR
PLASTIC -
1.040.00
•
_
41168 -
r,-
4
335766
11/25/86
96.09
SUPERIOR
REPAIR PARTS
335764
11/26/86
428.99
BEST BUY
CABLE TV
193.75 r
428.99
•
"•
335765
11/20/86
51.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
PARTS
ag'
_-.335765
11/20/86
_164.00
NELSON RADIO COMM
PARTS
'I
335765
11/20/86
87.00
-_,_ _
NELSON RADIO COMM
J PARTS
302.00
•
4 20- 560 -56 030391
10- 4620 - 560 -56
40- 4310 - 803 -80
27 -1300- 000 -00
10 -2149- 000 -00
10 -4620- 560 -56 14146
10 -4620- 560 - 56.14147__ -_ -_
10- 4620 - 560 -56 14120
Z,
y
f
-if.
335766
11/20/86
78.17-
SUPERIOR
PLASTIC -
CORRECTION
`10 -45404-89 -68
-
?'^
335766
11/20/66
78.17
SUPERIOR
PLASTIC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 689 -68
40947
335766
_ 11/20/66 __-
78.17
PLASTIC
REPAIR PARTS
26- 4540 - 689 -68
40947_
335766
11/20/86
19.49
SUPERIOR
PLASTIC -
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
_
41168 -
�i-
335766
11/25/86
96.09
SUPERIOR
PLASTIC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
41471
193.75 r
1%11
335767
11/20/86
105.99
0 C HEY
COMP INC
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 610 -61
Z,
y
f
-if.
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86 PACE 18
_CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV. 0 P.O. •MESSAGE
-iz
105.99 +
•',
335768 �
- 11/20/86 - --
_ -_ -- _-70.20
JIFFY JR PRODUCTS --
PARTS
27 -4620- 661 -66
15194-
-
70.20 +
-
335769
11/20/86
-45.00 -
MATSUSHITA SERV CO
CABLE REPAIR
10- 2149 - 000 -00
- r
45.00 +
a
335770
11/20/86
84.95
RED WINO SHOE
UNIFORM ALLOW
10 -4262- 301 -30
97169
�
-
84.95 +
' _ -
-- 335771 - - -
11/20/86 - -
- -" - - 72.00 - - --
-- ZACKS INC- - ---- - - - - -- -PARTS
27 -4620- 662 -66
14084 --
-.,
-
72.00 +
3
335772 -
11/20/86
- 100.00
- CLEN MORROW
WAGES
10- 4105 - 439 -42
•
-
100.00 +
�� •
•
335773
11/20/86
30.00 -
PRINT SHOP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
f0 -4516- 510 -51
- - - -- -
02361
-'
� --
-
30.00 +
335774-
11/20/86
-- 11.16
CUMMINS DIESEL SERV
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
-
11.16 +
335775
11/25/86
25.55 "
- WEST WELD -
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
63042
�i'•
335775
11/20/86
149.40
WEST WELD
TOO8
10 -4580- 560 -56
63037
174.95 •
_
335776
11/20/86
263.00
SWANSON BROS CO
CEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 301 -30
- -
263.00 +
335777
11/20/86
55.00
INTERN INSTITUTE OF
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
-
- -
-. - 55.00 +
'
335778
11/20/86
105.00
PINE WOOD PRODUCTS
CEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
11056D
--
105.00 +
335779
11/20/86
2,097.00
NORTHLAND ELECT
CONST
60- 1300 - 264 -04
335779
11/20/8.6
265.00-
NORTHLAND ELECT
CREDIT
60- 1300 - 264 -04
')
1,01
1,832.00 +
_
335780
11/20/86
_ 35.00 _-
-+
TOM ANDERSON-
DUES
10- 4204 - 490 -49
35.00
- -- --
S,
335781 _ -_
11/20/86 _
50.00_ +
` POSTMASTER _ -_
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
50.00 +
_
- _
°
335782
11/20/86
25.00
MPELRA
CONF 6 SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 140 -14
+
25.00 +
__ - - --
J _135783
_
11/24/86 - _-
- 81.00
TERRY ANN SALES CO
- - - -- --
GEN SUPPLIES
27 -4504- 661 -66
12176
81.00 +
^��
-.,,-
335784 --
- - - -_-
11/24/86^
- -_ _._
66.20
CSI
EQUIP MAINT
27 -4274- 661 -66
10660
335785
11/24/86
117.68
DAVES FOOD WAGON
CONCESSIONS
2T -4624- 664 -66
,
'
'.
.....
..... ...........
.......... _......,....
- - _..._..
.._.. --------
- _.._..._... _
•1966 . OF EDINA
,l
CHECK N0. DATE
- 335786 - - -- 11/24/86
335787 11/24/86
335788 - 11/24/86
335789
335792
v
335793
11/24/86
11/24/86 _._.
335794 _._ 11/e4/86
- -
11/24/86
335790
11/24/86
335791
11/24/86
21 335791_
11/24/86_ -_
-� 335791
11/24/86
335792
v
335793
11/24/86
11/24/86 _._.
335794 _._ 11/e4/86
- -
3
CHECK . .$TER
10 -31 -Se ACE 19
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P
117.68 +
109.00
335795
11/24/86
27 -4620- 661 -66
109.00
--
335796 -
- 11/24/66
a'r
335796
11/24/86
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 353 -30
335798
11/24/86
T
356.00
MINNESOA VALLEY
PLANTINGS b TREES
f i
335799 __ -
- - -1 1/24/86
w°
335800
J 11/24/86
3
335601
11/24/86
S
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
6974
335802
11%25%86
4s
' -I'°i
335802
11/es/66
3
CHECK . .$TER
10 -31 -Se ACE 19
AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P
117.68 +
109.00
BRAEMAR PRO SHOP
SUPPLIES
27 -4620- 661 -66
109.00
r
569.80
ARPS TREE - SERVICE
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 353 -30
569.80
•
356.00
MINNESOA VALLEY
PLANTINGS b TREES
10- 4560 - 643 -64
____
350.00
•
495.32
STERLING FENCE INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
6974
495.32
+
- 56.43
ART SIGN MATERIAL CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10 4504- 133 -12
51092
31.22
ART SIGN MATERIAL CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
51006
87.65
•
79.78
L A LAUKKA DEVEL CO
GEN SUPPLIE:
10- 4504 - 133 -12
4756
66._96
L A- LAUKKA DEVEL_CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 - 12_4771_
1.18
L A LAUKKA DEVEL CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
4774
147.92
r
350.00
JIM HALVERSON -
APPLIANCES
10 -4504- 646 -64
350.00
r
2,300.07 HENNEPIN CTY TREAS - RUBBISH REMVOAL -16-4250-353-30-12564---
2,300.07 r
13.50 STATE OF MINNESOTA - OFFICE- SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 200 -20
13.50 •
230.00
230.00 +
391.50
45.15
436.65 r
EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES
10- 4504 406 -50
ERIC ANDERSON CONT SERV 10 -4200- 500 -50
ERIC ANDERSON MILEAGE 10 -4208- 500 -50
140.00 - ^ IMPRINTERS - _ PRINTING - 10-4660-510-51-86-164
140.00 •
40.00 JONATHAN BALCH REFUND - 40 -3525- 000 -00 -
40.00 r
60.40 - COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00
60.40 •
24.75 BERNARD UNEHOFER - REFUND 40- 3525 - 000 -00
24.75 r
2,366.91 DONOHUE & -ASSOC SERVICES 40- 4220 - 800 -80 6661
2,595.06 DONOHUE 6 ASSOC SERVICES 40 -4220- 800 -80 66662
5
s�
,II
i.
- - - -- -ISM
ate,
31�
***-C KS
I
71
i�I
1986 CITY
OF EDINA
395.00 •
CHECK REGISTER
10 -31 -86 PAGE 20
J
11/25/86
214.63
CARLSON REFRIDG
CO
EQUIP MAINT
50- 4274 - 641 -84 R13634
-
335816
- - - --
11/2S/86
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
EQUIP MAINT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. 0 MESSAGE
-
261.63 +-
4,961.97
•
335817 _
I2
al
335803
11/25/86
1,020.00
10 =4510- 440-44
MARGOLIS BROTHERS -
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 137 -04
5533
1,020.00
•
335818 -
- 11/25/86
186.40
ALEXANDER MANUF
CO
1ST AID SPLY
335804
11/25/86
45.00^
- UNIVERSITY OF MINK- -
CONF 3 SCHOOL8
10- 4202 - 840 -24
361153
_
- I''i
45.00
•
Illy
�-
335805
11/25/86
S2.74
INTERLACHEN CTY
CITY OF RICHFIELD -- -
HEAT - --
10- 4252- 345 -30
-
_
52.74
•
335806
11/25/86
519.15
AQUA ENGINEERING INC
CONSTRUCTION
60 -1300- 269 -04
11339
-
519.15
+
I•:
335807
11/25/86
10,174.00
- J BELZERS TODD CHEV
AUTO
10- 4908- 502 -50
17583
_
10,174.00
•
335808
11/25/86
1,350.00
M'b S ROOFING INC
CONT - REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 520 -52
2596 1'
-
1,350.00
•
335809
11/25/86V-
- 94.10
GARTNER REFRID INC
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 707 -70
8439
94.10
•
335810
11/25/86
33.95
CLEAN FLO LAB - -
INDIANHEAD LAKE
10- 2242 - 000 -00
3762
33.95
+
-
- -
- - --
- - -
-- -- -- -- - -_ _-
- --28-
335811
11/25/86
242.00
EMR
CONT REPAIRS
4248 - 707 -70
84120
_
242.00
•
335812
11/25/86
25.86
EDINA POLICE DEPT
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 420 -42
_
335812
11/25/86
8.11
EDINA POLICE DEPT
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 420 -42
335812 _
_ 11/25/86 -
- -- - -_ - -- 8.64
- - - - -
EDINA POLICE DEPT
-- -EDINA
PRIS MEALS
10 -4286- 220 -22
i
335812
11/25/86
48.31
POLICE DEPT _ - --
POLICE EQUIP - --
-10- 4914 - 420- 42--
�---- - - - - - -- - - -
_
"S
90.92
+
,
335813 -
11/25/86
- 133.50
ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
CABLE TV
10- 2149- 000 -00
1
A46213
133.50
•
fzi--
I
_
335814
11/25/86 - --
�19.S0
SUPRA COLOR INC -
PHOTO SPLY
10- 4508 - 420 -42
CST
094087
_
335814
11/25/86
23.43
SUPRA COLOR INC
PHOTO SPLY
10- 4508 - 420 -42
�;-
42.93
+
_ ^^j
335815
11/25/86
395.00
REGISTRAR DEPT OF
REGISTRATLON
16- 4204 - 490 -49
395.00 •
_ICI
335816
11/25/86
214.63
CARLSON REFRIDG
CO
EQUIP MAINT
50- 4274 - 641 -84 R13634
-
335816
- - - --
11/2S/86
- 47.00 --
- CARLSON REFRIDG-CO
EQUIP MAINT
50- 4274- 841 -84 R13635
°^
261.63 +-
335817 _
_ 11/25/86_ -_
_ 130.00 - _
_
-H L MOORE _
_ -
1ST AID SPLY
10 =4510- 440-44
1
130.00 •
- -- - - - - -- -�:„
+'
335818 -
- 11/25/86
186.40
ALEXANDER MANUF
CO
1ST AID SPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44 126593
I
186.40 i
- I''i
1
p
335819
11/25/86
1,940.00
INTERLACHEN CTY
CLUB
CONSTRUCTION
„ I.
60- 1300- 264 -04 „•
c
1986 L
OF EDINA
CHECK BTER
10 -31 -86
GE 21
Y
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
_ VENDOR _ —
ITEM-DESCRIPTION
.
ACCOUNT NO INV__# P.O,8_MESSAGE------,
Y
1,940.00 •
-..
335820
11/25/86
397.95
CERT HYDRAUL SPECIAL
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56 15606
335820
11/25/86
170.55
CERT HYDRAUL SPECIAL
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56 15770
568.50 •
335821
11/25/86
18.72-
GUSTAVE A LARSEN
CORRECTION
10- 4540 - 390 -30
335821
11/25/86
18.72
GUSTAVE A LARSEN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 390 -30
335821
11/25/86
234.08
GUSTAVE A LARSEN
REPAIR PARTS
50- 4540 - 861 -86 537935
234.08 •
335822
11/25/86
289.47
DIESEL COMPONETS INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 26458
289.47 •
335823
11/25/86
21.34
-NORTHERN AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 36200
21.34 •
335824
11/25/86
4,359.50
DEDE HENSEL
PROF SERV
10 -2235- 000 -00
4,359.50 r
••••••
_
_
••• -CKS
337797
11/24/86
168.75
LIEN INFECT CONTROL
CONT SERV
27-4200- 661 -66
168.75 •
-- -- - - - - - --
- " - - -- - - -
rrr•••
••r -CKS
355031
11/20/86
11.14
BERTELSON BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 560 -56 244216
11.14 •
•r•••r
•r• -CKS
665136
11/20/86
80.50
EARL F ANDERSEN
SIGNS POSTS
10 -4542- 325 -30 66843
..
80.50 r
•rrrrr
-
-
•rr -CKS
r
197,944.28
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
+
1, 617.91 _._ ..
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
Computer- checks - #'s -74 725 thru 74952
5,350.00
FUND 25 TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
78.17
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
+
6,605.76
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
_
1,190.28 -
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
fir..
227.85
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
204,313.41 _._
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
APMOYMTC.f'AYhlW ,'
3,260.64
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
6,921.75
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
cMECK r- cr; T?'t
860.00
FUND 66 TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION 02
428,370.05,'
TOTAL
'1 �
�a%r ;r- �,�?"•�l< —fit—
�