HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-01-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 5, 1987
7:00 P. M.
ROLLCALL
I. AWARD OF BIDS - Installation of Window Washing Equipment - Edinborough Park
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
OATHS OF OFFICE - Frederick S. Richards and Glenn L. Smith
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterisk ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of November 17, 1986
III. APPOINTMENT OF MAYOR PRO -TEM
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Division, Plats,
Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final
Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Final Plat Approval
1. DCI Addition - Generally located north of Interlachen and east of
Blake Road
B. Preliminary Plat Approval
* 1. White Oaks 8th Addition - Generally located west of Townes Road and
south of Sunnyside Road (Continue to 1126187)
C. Set Hearing Date (1/26/87)
* 1. Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit 'District to R -2 Double Dwelling
Unit District - R. Hawthorne - Lot 4, Block 1, Peacedale Acres,
Hoppe Replat
2. Preliminary Plat Approval - Shadow Hill - Generally located north of
Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court - Robert Hansen
* 3. Conditional Use Permit - Colonial Church - Generally located west.of
Tracy Avenue and south of Olinger Boulevard
V. PUBLIC HEARING ON EASEMENT VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation
by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes
to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Vacation of Street /Utility Easement - Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park
Addition
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. One 112 Ton Pick -up
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Appointment of H.R.A. Commissioners (2)
* B. Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Dates
* C. Authorization of Bids for Tennis Courts and Pedestrian Bridge
* D. MNDOT Agency Agreement Approval
E. Advertising on Bus Shelters
F. Terms of Membership on City Advisory Board and Commissions
Agenda
Edina City Council
,Page Two
'January 5, 1987
IX'. RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
* A. Official Depositories Designation
* B. Signatory Resolution
* C. Facsimile Signatures
D. Assignment of Securities in Lieu of Bond
1. First Bank Edina
2. First Southdale National Bank
X. SPECIAL BUSINESS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
* A. Liquor Fund Balance Sheet of November 30, 1986
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon
Jan
12
Special Council
Meeting - Mission Statement
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Jan
19
MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY
CITY
HALL
CLOSED
Mon
Jan
26
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
'Mon
Feb
2
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Feb
16
PRESIDENTS' DAY
CITY
HALL
CLOSED
,Mon
Feb
23
Regular Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
-TO: Edina HRA
FROM: Gordon Hughes
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 5, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Installation of Window Washing Equipment
- Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Danny's Construction Company
2. Harmon Contract Glazing
op
Department Recommendation:
Danny's Construction Comnnnv
Finance Director's Endorsement:
HRA.I
Amount of Quote or Bid
$5,400.00
$6,100.00
&f--
Department
The recommended bid 10 is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City Man er's Endorsement:
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosla d, City Man Per
r
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 17, 1986
Answering rollcall were Members.Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
OFFICERS NISSEN AND JAMES COMMENDED. Manager Rosland introduced Officers Richard
Nissen and William James, noting that both officers were involved in the resusci-
tation of a City employee several months ago. He stated that Officer Nissen has
been with the City for 262 years and Officer James for 192 years. Mr. Rosland
commended them for their dedicated service to the City and its residents and they
were presented with silver pens bearing the Edina logo. Members of the Council
also extended their thanks and commendation to them for their dedication as Police
Officers.
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC TEAMS COMMENDED. The Mayor presented and moved adoption
of resolutions commending the Girls' Tennis Team, Girls' Soccer Team, Boys' Soccer
Team and Michelle Chupurdia who represented the Girls' Cross Country Running Team
and Michael Curry who represented the Boys' Cross Country Running Team for their
accomplishments in recent state meets. The resolutions were unanimously adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded.by
Member Kelly to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
ORDINANCE NO. 451 -A5 ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR SIGNAGE IN THE MIXED DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICT GRANTED FIRST READING. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved
and ordered placed on file: Planner Craig Larsen presented a proposed amendment
to Ordinance No. 451 (Sign Ordinance) which would establish standards for signage
in the Mixed Development QID) District. There are currently no standards for
signs in the MD District. He said that most of the requirements for the MD Districts
flow from requirements for individual use districts. The office, multi- family and
institutional standards are essentially the same as for the individual uses. Free-
standing area identification signs are controlled by the number of street frontages
and size of development. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the differences are basically
in these areas: 1) area identification signs, 2) accessory retail signs, and 3)
intra area directories. For the MD -3 and MD -4 Districts one area identification
sign is proposed not to exceed 50 square feet in area; for the MD -5 District (Edin-
borough) one sign per development not to exceed 70 square feet in area. For deve-
opments with more than one street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage
is permitted provided it does not exceed 40 square feet in area. For accessory
retail signs, one identification wall sign per accessory use attached to the facing
of the building at the ground floor level is permitted not to exceed 15% of the
ground floor wall facing. One intra area directory sign per major entry is pro-
posed not to exceed 10 square feet. Mr. Larsen said the proposed amendment has been
discussed with Peter Jarvis with regard to the Edinborough project and the signage
they have proposed will comply with these standards. Member Bredesen asked how
this would affect potential future developments and commented that this amendment
is proposed because of the Edinborough project. Mr. Larsen said staff tried to
create standards which would not be in.conflict with what other property owners
would be allowed for individual uses. Member Richards said this would create the
ability for larger signage and he felt the existing ordinance which was adopted
after much deliberation should remain. Mr. Larsen said the sign ordinance refer-
ences particular zoning districts and there is presently no provision for the MD
Districts. Member Turner pointed out that in the Planned Industrial District
the maximum sign area is 80 square feet and in the Planned Commercial District it
is 100 square feet and questioned why the requirement for the MD Districts is less.
Mr. Larsen said that since the Mixed Development District is not a straight commer-
cial development the signage requirement allowed in the Commerical District would
not be justified, but it would justify larger signage requirements than in.a
straight office development. Member Kelly..made a motion for adoption of.Ordinance
No. 451 -A5 with waiver of Second Reading. Motion was seconded by Member Turner..:-
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Bredesen, Richards
Motion failed.
Member Kelly then introduced Ordinance No. 451 -A5 for First Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE No. 451 -A5
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 451
BY ADDING REGULATIONS FOR THE MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 5 of Ordinance No. 451 is hereby amended by adding the
following paragraph:
11/17/86
"(h) Mixed Development District.
(1) Area Identification Signs:
(a) MD -3 and MD -4 Districts: One sign not to exceed 50 square
feet in area.
(b) MD -5 District: One sign per development not to exceed 70
square feet in area. For developments with more than one
street frontage, one additional sign per street frontage
provided each additional permitted sign does not exceed
40 square feet in area.
(c) Intra Area Directories: One per major entry, not to exceed
10 square feet.
(2) Multi- family residential complex containing 10 or more dwelling
units: one freestanding sign per complex not to exceed 24 square
feet in area. Individual buildings: one wall mounted identifica-
tion sign not to exceed 6 square feet.
(3) Office Buildings: One sign per building, not to exceed 50 square
feet in area. Where such building is located on a corner lot, one
sign may be located on each street frontage provided the first does
not exceed 50 square feet and other permitted signs do not exceed
36 square feet.
(4) Public Institutional or Recreational Use: One sign per street
frontage, not to exceed 24 square feet in area.
(5) Accessory Retail Signs: One identification wall sign per accessory
use attached to the facing of the building at the ground floor level
is permitted. The area of such sign shall not exceed 15% of the
ground floor wall facing. All signs shall be individual letters
of uniform size, design, and materials..
(6) Free standing signs shall be placed no- closer than 10 feet to any
street right -of -way.
(7) Temporary Signs: Refer to Section 3.
(8) Traffic Directional Signs: Refer to Section 3.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication. _
Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Bredesen.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
First Reading granted.
Member Richards asked that, in accordance with the Council's discussion, staff
prepare a comparison of signage proposed for the Mixed Development District with
other zoning districts and that an attempt be made to publicize the amendment
prior to Second Reading. Speaking on behalf of the Edinborough project, Peter
Jarvis said that the thrust behind looking at signage •in.the Mixed "Development
District was because of the integration of uses. The idea was to get at two areas
that are not covered in the present sign ordinance: 1) exterior monumentation (one
project with four uses, i.e. condominiums, senior housing, park and the office)
and 2) directional signs for visitors because of the nature of the project.
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENTS GRANTED FOR LOTS 1. 2. 3 AND 12. BLOCK 1. GRAND-
VIEW PLATEAU. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and.ordered placed
on file. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the request for vacation of utility
easements for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 12, Block 1, Grandview Plateau has been continued
from the Council meeting of August 18 and subsequent meetings. He explained that
the developer of the Biltmore Motel site has requested that utility easements be
vacated that run through the interior of the site and along the westerly property
line of the site. Mr. Hoffman reminded the Council Members that in connection
with a vacation of easements along the frontage road adjacent to the subject site,
which was granted in December, 1983, the developer had given the City a floating
easement for construction of a traffic signal. Staff would recommend that the
easements be vacated which are located in the interior of the site and that the
five foot utility easement be retained on the westerly side of the subject property.
Mr. Hoffman added that Northern States Power Company has requested that the
easement on the westerly side be increased by five feet for a total easement of
ten feet. This request has been discussed with the attorney for the developer.and
they have agreed to grant the request of NSP. No comment or objections being heard,
Member Bredesen introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION VACATING UTILITY EASEMENTS
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City .Council, adopted the 21st day of July, 1986,
fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easements for utility
purposes; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and
the hearing was held on the 17th day of November, 1986, at which time all persons
desiring to be.heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said easement vacations be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
I 11/17/$6
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality
owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer
lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed
vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area
or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair,,replace, remove, or otherwise
attend thereto;
'NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Henne-
pin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the utility
easements be and is hereby vacated effective as of November 18, 1986:
Utility easements over the Southerly 5 feet of Lots 1, 2 and 3, except for
the westerly 5 feet of Lot 3, and the Northerly 5 feet of Lot 12, except
for the westerly 5 feet thereof, all in Block 1, as platted on and dedicated
by the plat of GRANDVIEW PLATEAU, Hennepin County, Minnesota
and that the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion
of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County
Auditor, and filed with the Register of Deeds in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 413.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLE. Motion was made by Member Turner and
seconded by Member Kelly to award the.bid for an administrative vehicle to
recommended low bidder, Todd Chevrolet, at $10,171.00.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 11/12/86 APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman told
the Council that the request to discuss traffic safety concerns at the inter-
section of Warren Avenue and West 64th Street had been continued until next
month for further review by the Committee and area residents. He noted that
residents of the area were present to present their concerns. Mr. Hoffman
said the greatest concerns seem to be: 1) how to reduce speed when confronted
with the grade of the hill and the signing problems that now exist, and 2) how
to increase visibility so that drivers and pedestrians have time to observe
and react. He then summarized the discussion that was held at the Traffic
Safety Committee meeting. He said that the most cruical concern has been
addressed in that the school bus stop has been permanently relocated to 6321
Warren Avenue away from the intersection to increase the safety for the young
children. Mrs. Frances Magoffin, 6340 Warren Avenue, and Ms. Midge Counton,
6327 Warren Avenue, reiterated their concerns for the intersection. Mr. Hoffman
said the problem would be reviewed and studied by the Committee and that
recommended action will be presented to the Council at its December 15 meeting.
Member Bredesen's motion was seconded by Member Richards to approve the following
recommended action as listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes
of November 12, 1986:
1) To place the intersection of Tracy Avenue at Warden Avenue on the enforce-
ment list and begin heavier enforcement measures beginning January 1, 1987,
2) Placement of "NO PARKING ANYTIME" and "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" signs based
on the plan established by the Police Department, Public Works Department
and Park and Recreation_Department to improve traffic flow and safety at
Braemar Arena,
3) That the "NO PARKING SIGNS THIS SIDE OF STREET" be removed from the 5500
block of Code Avenue, -
and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the Minutes.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION UPDATE REPORT GIVEN. Manager Rosland advised that the
following were present to give an update on regional transportation: Dottie Rietow,
Metropolitan Council Member; Nacho Diaz, Director of Transportation /Metro Council;
Allison Fuhr, Rapid Transit Board Member and Katie Turnbull, Planning Manager /RTB.
Mrs. Rietow said that the Metropolitan Council is revising its transportation policy
guide chapter and that it is important to have local input prior to actual writing
of the document. She said the Council is facing some difficult decisions regarding
highway congestion and decisions will be based on the policy that is drafted. She
introduced Nacho Diaz who gave an overview of what the Council is looking at in
terms of developing its plan. He said that the transportation plan could consist
of two elements: transit and highway and will incorporate what has been learned in
the past three to four years about the,way people travel in the metropolitan area.
People are traveling more frequently and further away from their homes and places
of employment as is apparent in the numbers of highways that have become increas-
ingly congested. Another factor is the suburbanization of the metropolitan area.
Many years ago there was a migration to the suburbs to seek residences outside
the central city. Now there is a major migration of employment base towards the
11/17/86
suburban areas such as the I -494 corridor where a tremendous growth in employ-
ment has been taking place and is forecast for the future. The I -494 corridor
is seen as a major problem in the region and a solution that will make it workable
from a transportation standpoint for the next 20 to 30 years is one of the
Council's highest priorities. That is the reason for the I -494 Corridor Study in
which Edina is participating. Mr. Diaz said a second study is being conducted on
the 35W south corridor which coming from downtown Minneapolis all the way out to
Dakota County is seen as the second major problem area. The question to be faced
in those corridors and in the region as a whole is what solutions can be found
for these problems. Obviously a very significant infrastructure of highways, free-
ways and expressways has been built that we probably will never be able to duplicate
again. Very innovative solutions must be found in order to make those roads work.
The Council is also looking at what potential there is for major capital investment
in transit for the region, i.e. can we build special facilities such as bus lanes,
high occupancy lanes, and light rail transit to come up with a combined highway
solution that could compliment each other. Mr. Diaz concluded that we are facing
very great challanges because the region is becoming more decentralized and there
are more trips to be satisfied. Allison Fuhr stated that the Rapid Transit Board
has now finished its Transit Service Needs Assessment (TSNA). She then introduced
Katie Turnbull who recalled that the RTB was created by the legislature in 1984 and
charged primarily with short to mid -range transit planning, transit policy making
and transit administration in the seven county metropolitan area. The purpose of
the TSNA was to take an overall comprehensive look at transit services and transit
needs in the metropolitan area. Four major elements: public participation, market
research technical analysis and national and local expertise were utilized
throughout the assessment. Five transit need indicators were used: 1) population
and employment concentrations, 2) transit dependent market segments, 3) highway
congestion, 4) travel desires, and 5) existing transit supply. Ms. Turnbull then
summarized the transit indicators mainly as they pertain to Edina. In summary,
she said that population and employment levels in this subarea are forcast to
remain relatively constant to the year 2000, with the exception of Edina, which
is projected to experience a growth of 13,000 in employment. Concentrations of
elderly populations are found in all three communities (Edina, Hopkins, St. Louis
Park) and some other transit dependent groups exist. The transit service from
the subarea to the Minneapolis central city and central business district is good.
All three cities are supplied good local service and some form of express service.
Edina has a crosstown route connection to subarea 16 (Richfield and Bloomington)
and to the airport. However, there is little crosstown coverage within the subarea
itself and there is a large desire for travel between and within the subarea's
three cities. Southdale shopping center is currently used as a hub for a number
of transit routes. The close proximity of a number of elderly complexes to South -
dale also offers the opportunity to provide good transit access to this population.
;Highway 12 is currently being upgraded to Interstate 394 and the final design
contains a number of elements to encourage and enhance the use of carpools, vanpools,
and buses including high occupancy vehicle lanes, ramp metering, etc. Ms. Turnbull
concluded her report with the following potential transit service strategies:
1) Continued marketing of the I -394 HOV facilities, 2) Revision of express /local
transit services, particularly in northern St. Louis Park, 3) Enhancement of the
Southdale shopping center as a major transit hub, 4) Expansion of the Southdale
park- and -ride with express service to the Minneapolis CBD, 5) Evaluation of cross-
town Route 36 between Edina, St. Louis Park, Golden Valley and Minnetonka based on
route based on route performance criteria, 6) Provision of local route.connection
or good route transfer alternatives at major generators between. Hopkins and Edina,
7) Evaluation of the cost /benefit of serving and maintaining park- and -rides which
are receiving limited usage. Ms. Turnbull said that over the next several years
we will begin to see some of these strategies and recommendations implemented,
following the conclusion of the I -494 and 35W corridor studies. Input from local
communities /councils will be important as the Metropolitan Council revises its
transportation policy guide chapter and prepares to make decisions concerning
regional transportation. A brief discussion followed with no action being taken.
UPDATE GIVEN ON PROBLEM OF DEER IN AREA. Manager Rosland recalled that at the last
meeting a resident had shared her concerns with the Council regarding the nuisance
created by deer in her neighborhood. The Council had asked staff to gather addi -.
tional information and to contact the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
as how to approach this problem. Staff has reviewed the records.and there have
been 11 recorded automobile accidents involving deer in 1986. During the past three
years there have been 17 -18 deer /car mishaps. In talking with John Parker of the
DNR he suggested that a control program for deer may be more feasible if directed
at more than one city. It has been proposed that representatives of Edina, Eden
Prairie and Bloomington meet to discuss the problem. Mr. Parker said that funding
limitations may curtail the DNR's aerial survey of deer this winter and that muni-
cipalities may be asked to contribute funds. Mr. Rosland said staff would keep
working on this and that he would keep the Council informed as to progress.
11/17/86
DEVELOPMENT OF HEDBERG PROPERTY DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised the Council
that the vacant land in the southeast area of the City owned by the Hedberg family
apparently is for sale. The Hedberg property is approximately 87 acres of which
4 -5 acres lies in Bloomington, and about 20 acres are within the existing Southeast
Edina Tax Increment District. The Hedberg family has asked several developers to
submit proposals. United Properties and Winfield have contacted staff regarding
the property and what could be proposed to be developed thereon. Member Kelly
commented that the City should not be locked into a rezoning of the property for
a development that may not become a reality for a number of years until a demand
is created for the proposed project. Member Richards said he was aware that the
Hedberg property was on the market and that he felt the City has an opportunity to
consider being involved to a greater extent than having a proposal submitted for
development of that property. The possibility may exist for the City to purchase
the'land and develop it by means of a tax increment district for housing stock;
specifically as an extention of the Edinborough type townhouse project: Member
Richards said that if the Council wishes to proceed that some preliminary
analysis should be made as to land area, use of tax increment financing by the
HRA, acquisition of the property and the existing Southeast Edina Tax Increment
District and that he would support this. He said he had discussed this with Larry
Laukka, one of the developers of the Edinborough project, and asked Mr. Laukka to
comment on the feasibility of a similar project for the Hedberg property. Mr. Laukka
said that the Edinborough project is doing better than had been anticipated. As
to the housing-component, 65% of the housing units have been sold with the 2nd
Phase starting to be occupied this week, the 3rd Phase will start being occupied
in January, 1987, the 4th and 5th Phases in Spring and presumably the 6th and 7th
Phases will be occupied before the end of 1987. He said that any developer would
suggest that those figures indicate a successful project. The real measure of
success is that it comes from the types of people who are buying the units. As of
now, Mr. Laukka stated that of those people who have purchased units, 86% earn less
than $38,000, 60% are under the age of 37 indicating first -time home buyers, 80%
are single and there are a number of buyers who are over 55. He said these numbers
.indicate that there is something going in the Edinborough project that simply has
not happened in other housing projects and that he has not seen this kind of mix of
people come together in a community. Mr. Laukka said he felt the Edinborough
community will become a rock in the City., i.e. a place that is meaningful, attract-
ive, where resale will be an honest item and a place where people will want to
live. He added that over half of the sales have been to people who have ties with
the community. He felt that the 7 Phases or "villages" of dense development will
have their own identity, will be joined into a larger community called Edinborough
which will become part of the larger community of Edina. Mr. Laukka concluded
that a need for and interest in this type of housing will continue; that the City
has a unique opportunity which will only come once to pursue the next round of
housing to serve this kind of need. Member Richards then made a motion that:
1) the Hedbergs be advised of the City's interest in purchasing a portion of their
property, 2) a study be made of the type of funding available through a tax incre-
ment district that would sustain a purchase of the property, 3) the tax laws be
reviewed regarding this type housing development, and 4) the Planning Department
look at what type of housing stock may be possible for the subject property.
Motion was seconded by Member Kelly.
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Bredesen commented that this is a unique opportunity to act rather than
react and that the City should articulate its thoughts on the use of that property
to benefit the entire community.
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS DISCUSSED. Manager.Rosland.called the
Council's attention to the 1987 schedule for Hennepin County Committee Appoint-
ments, noting that Member Kelly's term on the CASH Board will end on August 26,
1978, that E. R. McGlynn's term on the Library Board will end on January 31, and
that terms on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board will end on March 8.
Member Richards said that James B. McWethey,was still interested in the Minne-
haha Creek Watershed District Board even though he was not re- appointed. He also
suggested that the City's advisory boards /commissions be advised of these appoint-
ments as well as those to State agencies so that they could suggest names of
individuals from Edina who might be interested in serving in those positions.
Manager Rosland said that could be done with a mailing to the board /commission
members. Member Kelly said she felt it important that Edina be represented on
the watershed district board. She also noted a vacancy on the Community Health
Services Advisory Committee and suggested that Virginia McCollister, a member
of the Edina Advisory Board of Health, ,.may be interested and suggested she be
contacted. Member Kelly then moved adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby nominates and recommends to
the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners that E. R. McGlynn be reappointed
11/17/86
to the Hennepin County Library Board;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that James B. McWethy be nominated and recommended for
appointment to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
*TAX FORFEITED LANDS DECLARED "NON- CONSERVATION AND FOR SALE ". Motion was made
by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County
of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property
of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list
is dated September 19, 1986, Report No. P1421101, 688 NC; and
WHEREAS, each parcel of land described in said list has heretofore been
classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota
as non - conservation land and the sale thereof has heretofore been authorized
by said Board of-County Commissioners;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by said City Council, acting pursuant to Minn-
esota Statute 282, and the said classification by said Board of County
Commissioners of each parcel of land described in said list as non - conservation
land be and the same is hereby approved, and that the sale of each such parcel
of land be limited to abutting property owners for attachment thereto.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING DATES CONFIRMED. In response to Member Kelly the
following special meeting dates were confirmed:
l) Year -End Council Meeting - Tuesday, December 30 at 5:00 p.m.
2) Special Meeting - Mission Statement - Monday, January 12
3) Special Meeting - Council Retreat - Saturday, March 21
Member Kelly noted that she would be absent from the January 5, 1987 Council
Meeting.
EDINAMITE DATES NOTED. Member Turner reminded the Council that Edinamite will
be held on Saturday, February 28 and that.the Council Party- Benefit for The
Edina Foundation is scheduled for Sunday, February 1.
'..'iMPROVEMENT OF WEST.50TH STREET BETWEEN EDINA COURT AND HALIFAX DISCUSSED. Member
Richards said he had received a call from a resident who had heard that West.50th
,east of Wooddale Avenue was proposed to be widened. Engineer Hoffman said there
has been no change in the roadway design since the public hearing and that the
!only issue unresolved is whether to expend the funds to bury the existing utility
lines. .Manager Rosland said there is a timing problem because of the proposed
work by the State on France Avenue and the activities planned for the Edina
'Centennial in 1988. Member Bredesen urged that the project go forward as soon as
possible and that an informational meeting be held for the residents in that area.
Mr. Rosland said that the 50th and France merchants are concerned about access to
the business district if both streets are under construction at the same time. He
said that staff will contact the State to determine when the France Avenue project
will be started and will bring that information back to the Council.
LMC LEGISLATIVE POLICY ADOPTION MEETING DATE NOTED. Manager Rosland reminded
;.the Council members of the League of Minnesota Cities Legislative Policy Adoption
meeting to be held on November 20.
MANAGER'S SALARY COMPENSATION DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland referred the Council to
the survey of managers' salaries in the metropolitan area in connection with his
request for a salary increase which was presented at the budget hearings. Member
Bredesen suggested that a process be developed for the following: 1) Review of
of the manager's compensation each year, 2) Development of a job description for
the manager, 3) Managerial objectives for each year, 4) Review of manager's per-
formance after each year. To facilitate the process, Member Bredesen suggested
that Mr. Rosland draft a job description and set of objectives for 1987 and bring
those back for the Council's review and discussion in December. No formal action
was taken.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for
payment of the following claims as per Pre -List dated 11/17/86: General Fund
$283,717.40, Art Center $2,406.82, Capital Fund $10,600.00, Swimming Pool Fund
$70.07, Golf Course Fund $24,140.84, Recreation Center Fund $2,889.90, Utility
I11/17/86
Fund $9,142.22, Liquor Dispensary Fund $93,763.46, Construction Fund $182,319.62,
Total $609,050.33, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims
dated 10/31/86: General Fund $1,130,152.31, Art Center $1,144.73, Swimming Pool
Fund $244.60, Golf Course Fund $6,833.70, Recreation Center Fund $7,148.06,
Gun Range Fund $452.18, Utility Fund $26,042.97,-.Liquor Dispensary Fund
$301,494.04, Total $1,473,512.59.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared
the meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m.
City Clerk
LOCATION, MAP =• A
suenivisioN
NUMBER S -85 -11
L O C A TI O N 6224 Interlachen Blvd., Part of vacated blocks 25 and 26,
Mendelssohn Addition, part of lot 1, Auditor's Sub No. 248,
lying northerly of Interlachen Road
REQUEST Two lot subdivision
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
f QQCC
Subdivision No. S- 95;—
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBDIVISION NAME: IJ _� 4�al o J
LAND SIZE: I LO� LAND VALUE:
(By: Date:
The developer of this subdivision has been required to
ElA. grant an easement over part of the land
EJB. dedicate %:of the land
�j C. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
M 2. If property is 6 acres or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
j� 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
�5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
n 6.
B. Cash Required
El1. In all other instances than above.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION INC. (6224 INTERLACHEN
BOULEVARD). Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Mr. Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval
for Developers Construction, Inc. Addition, advising that the subject property
is generally located north of Interlachen Boulevard and east of Blake Road. It
measures approximately 205 feet in width and 156 feet in depth and contains
31,300 square feet. The property is zoned R -1 Single Dwelling District, and is
developed with two single dwelling units. Since the Zoning Ordinance allows
only one dwelling per lot in the R- l.zone the property is non - conforming. The
subject property is bounded on the east and north by Interlachen Country Club.
Single family dwelling are located to the immediate west and to the southeast
across Interlachen Boulevard. :Mirror Lake is located directly to the south.
61 Mr. Larsen stated that the proponents have submitted a preliminary plat which
would create two buildable lots following the demolition of the existing dwell-
ings. Lot 1 would be 105 feet in width and would contain 14,000 square feet.
Lot 2 would measure 100 feet in width and contain 17,300 square feet. Both new
lots would conform to Ordinance requirements. Also included in the plat is
Outlot A which was detached from the-subject property by Interlachen Boulevard.
The marjority of the outlot is located within the lakebed of Mirror Lake. The
existing dwellings are connected to sanitary sewer which runs through the Inter-
lachen Club property to the north. However, the units are not connected to
public water but are served by a private well. The right of way for Interlachen
Boulevard, adjacent to the subject property, is provided by an easement which
is narrower than necessary for the existing roadway. The proposed plat would
dedicate the required 66 foot wide right of way. Mr. Larsen pointed out that
the right of way must be reviewed and approved by Hennepin County. The pro-
posed subdivision would eliminate the existing non - conforming condition and
would provide two conforming lots. The site is relatively isolated from neigh-
boring single family properties. It would seem to relate most to .lots to the
north and northwest and the proposed lot sizes are similar to lots in that
neighborhood. The Community Development and Planning Commission considered the
plat at its meeting of October 20, 1985 and recommended preliminary approval
conditioned on: 1) execution of a developer's agreement for the installation
of public water service to the properties, 2) subdivision dedication, and
3) approval by Hennepin County of the proposed right of way. The Commission
also discussed and recommended that one curb cut serve both properties.
Mr. Larsen informed the Council that the proponent has met with Hennepin County
and they have given preliminary approval on the location of the one curb cut.
No comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption, subject to the conditions in the staff report as outlined
and the one curb cut:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR DEVELOPERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Developers Construction, Inc. Addition ", platted by
Developers Construction, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the
regular meeting of the City Council of November 18, 1985, be and is hereby
granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR FOUR WHEEL DRIVE ARTICULATE R. sir. Rosland presented
tab ion of bids for one four wheel articulated loader, showing Ziegler,
Inc. at 990.00 for Bid C (to ost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of
$66,500.00/5 ye r a net f $42,290.00 and showing Case Power S Equip-
ment at $81,213.00 for total cost bid) with guaranteed repurchase of
$58,500.00 /5 years fo net o $23,213.00. The bid submitted by Minneapolis
Equipment was in ete and tti ere Fo not considered. Mr. Rosland added
that staff.h viewed the bids and woul mmend award of bid to Ziegler, Inc.
for the r ns outlined in the staff memoranda ovember 15, 1985, which
D C I
ADDITION
NoarX LINT etocK
I � I
n •111Rln• .. .v .
lirw l•:t ehw 1.9.,..•..
Al: :::Ar Fir• _t •::.•
A ir::<fo u, 1e1 r iGwe .a
.. ..c itn E. e. .r1A i•:
ct . crew 1r anylr
•J • l..tnr r.�w r., �:
'ns• Cart ':! . :a1•
:n•• 9•:r:n•es:--.ar•.t
70 O •�_
I '
..,c 11[r <rs t111
Hr.w ce�Aei thw •]�
•r.
IN
SCALE FEET
I
I
�rar. ^.av^ •n.t •.tr lr...
.
r =-
lr. aerwn• h--f
RE�RINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON AN ASSUMED DATUM
�
t
- -
--
O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT
=
0.
O
r _ - o
,\ \
N
J
:n •1rr.t,w rr.w: �•t
-111
O
C `J
o
O!
'ENCX MARK Top XtCpLNT Sr CORNER INTERLACHEN BLVD
AND BLAKE ROAD
^t
`\
=
ELEVATION: 915 re
1 k v 0 - 1929 1
\
ry
NY
L,�
\ 20000
u
w
z
�a(
z
00148--
u
t
f '•
j I
♦ v P
IS
S `
EAlE'wEN � rtMGE
F
A.
NO Ur;l1lY
..
VI
\/
c
`
Z
.-Do
\` ♦ `'
I
2
\v
W
O
O
r
"-'
N
o
20500
J
Z
e
O
I
W
I
z
Y.
ypypr
J PI
9
-
f
I
P
O
b ml
O
O
N
W
e
� -
a
699e
__
N
O !B •
v
R I
^ \`\
O
w �/
/ EIi
A10 ET CR]INAGE G UTI..lt
/ EASEMENT
u
n `
-
N
.1
1
/ r
-e
7,63
� RRO
a.; F F A(
'
R
�� F
05- —=e. 11' '20)
.1 ,
ago 'r.
w. -FR •L= .]T-1rr ]S :F Al..:,—
l Y RO JS..
P25. '986 _ J f ,(,O �`^r{
-1
IF
I
Y 6 f FEE- 1% -• . 7- 9291
i 2j3 J
^
11
OUTLOT A:
e
=LMAR H. SCHWANZ
�
.70 23 77 TT
!
!22�M PEST --
K
01
zoe.00 WEST ��
--
AND SURVEYORS INC.
�'SOUTN LINE OF NE 1/A SEC. 30, rwp 11117,GE 21
— _�
^
^
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
D.C.I. ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "D.C.I. ADDITION ", platted by Developers Construction,
Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and Suburban National Bank, a United States
corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
January 5, 1987, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1987.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 5, 1987, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of February, 1987.
City Clerk
V.A
CITY OF EDINA
PUI,LIC RIGHT- OF -1,JAY VACATI0N APPLICATION
Date Initiated November 13, 1986
1) I hereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following
described public right -of -way:
Street F] Alley FX] Utility Easement
F1Drainage Easement Other
(describe)
Description of area proposed to be vacated:
East 25 feet of Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition.
Commencing at the Northeast corner of Lot 39, thence South to the Southeast
corner, thence West 25 feet, thence North to a point 25 feet West from the
Northeast corner of Lot 39, thence East to point of beginning, of Lot 39,
Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition.
Attach copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail the proposed vacation.
Signature ���
5200 Gorgas Ave. T'711
Address Edina, MN 55424
Telephone 926-9740
2) Review
CITY ENGINEER b
Conditions
MINNECASCO
Conditions
N.W. BELL by
Conditions
N.S.P. by
Conditions
Acceptable El Opposed r= Conditional
Acceptable Q Opposed Conditional
TO Acceptable El Opposed a Conditional
Acceptable _a Opposed r] Conditional
16 -33sb
r,-?-LOO-)
24 2nd
Q* 10 7.14
still
1916
14
3s®
1i3
a
"
D
- I*Tir3..1 0 N
Q'i61
51a4
7®
Q
Bill
q IZ
.4
0
L—
Z
2 G, 0
Z�
4,10
70
z
J So
165
105
50
52 nd-
"
.;C_
4z ko
5A00
16
4 1
r,-?-LOO-)
&5.
a
A, L4 !. -5 0 0
sits 1 I
COV-* 0-4 4 7
Ly
W
Sul -'t i U) 1 > A4 ar) Tf -
W
oce-&
J4
A
Ake r L
SIP9
.(AV ! ro I CIS
sum ITC r 13s cr
also
C
its)
_e __ 4!
7� zcp, z
ev . _j
39 .09', c-a--k-)-o su _�7, o
r.00 CL
- -REED !�I uj . :a
ST LU
L3 z
0
A o1z
Ao
39 � %3 U_
L) 0
C; 37
_j 1
NO
>1
35--
0
"44 34
_Z71 LLI
:>
LLI
AM
IAA 10
251
&404
24 2nd
z z
1i3
&5.
a
A, L4 !. -5 0 0
sits 1 I
COV-* 0-4 4 7
Ly
W
Sul -'t i U) 1 > A4 ar) Tf -
W
oce-&
J4
A
Ake r L
SIP9
.(AV ! ro I CIS
sum ITC r 13s cr
also
C
its)
_e __ 4!
7� zcp, z
ev . _j
39 .09', c-a--k-)-o su _�7, o
r.00 CL
- -REED !�I uj . :a
ST LU
L3 z
0
A o1z
Ao
39 � %3 U_
L) 0
C; 37
_j 1
NO
>1
35--
0
"44 34
_Z71 LLI
:>
LLI
AM
IAA 10
251
&404
East Ip. of Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition
Scale: 11 = .0625" or 1/16"
West
North
South
East
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
?ROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: December 31, 1986
Material Description (General Specifications):
One 1/2 Ton Pick -up for Public Works
Funds from Equipment Replacement Fund
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Suburban Chevrolet
2. Polar Chevrolet
). Todd Chevrolet
Department Recommendation:
Suburban Chevrolet
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is V/ is not
VII.A
Amount of Quote or Bid
$10,075.92
$10,092.00
$10,700.00
$10,075.92
L
Z� Public Works - Streets
Signat a Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
�/�/ o�XJ��►n 6.?
John Wallin, Financ irector
Cit Merger's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase. A
2. I recommend as an alternative:
VIII. B
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report - Set Hearing Dates (1/26/87)
DATE: January 2, 1987
The following improvements have been investigated and it has been
determined that they are feasible and their construction would be
in the best interest of the overall development of the City of Edina:
IMPROVEMENT & LOCATION
P-L-29 Street Lighting
York Ave. from Parklawn to Edinborough Way
P -L -30 Street Lighting
W. 76th St. from Edinborough Way to Xerxes Ave.
P -L -31 Street Lighting
Edinborough Way from W. 76th St. to York Ave.
P -BA -272 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete
Curb & Gutter
Dearborn Ct. in Dearborn Add'n and Blakewoods Add'n
P -BA -273 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete
Curb & Gutter
Antrim Terr. in Edina Oaks-Add'.n
ESTIMATED COST
$ 91,780.00
$ 43,664.00
$ 84,401.00
$ 22,411.79
$ 11,422.51
P -BA -275 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete $ 45,219.03-
Curb & Gutter
Green Farm Rd. & Apple Ln. in Parkwood Knolls 22nd
. Add'n
P -BA -276 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete $ 80,455.83
Curb & Gutter
All streets in Interlachen Heights Add'n
The Staff would recommend public hearings on January 26, 1987.
FH: jr
VIII. C
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Authorization of Bids - Tennis Courts.and Pedestrian Bridge
DATE: January 2, 1987
The Staff has prepared plans and specifications for the following:
A. Pedestrian bridge for Executive Nine Golf Course (crossing over
Braemar Blvd.).
B. Tennis Courts at Lewis Park.
C. Tennis Court renovation at Cornelia Park.
The funds for these park improvements will be from the Capital Fund for
1987 and carryover from 1986.
The Staff recommendation is for the City Council to authorize bids for
the above listed projects.
FH:jr
VIII. D
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: MNDOT Agency Agreement
DATE: January 2, 1987
Annually, the City of Edina enters into an agency agreement with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation for federally funded projects.
The City appoints the MNDOT Commissioner to act as it's agent for al.l
federally funded projects. This allows MNDOT to receive the federal
funds and let contracts pursuant to law for construction and improve-
ment of local roads and bridges.
The Staff recommendation is for the City Council to authorize the
Mayor and Manager to sign the annual agency agreement.
FH: jr
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AID FORM NO. III
Be it resolved that pursuant to Section 161.36,
Subdivision 1 through 6, Minnesota Statutes, the Commissioner of
Transportation be appointed as agent of the City of Edina
to let as its agent, contracts for the construction of local roads
and bridges, and the Mayor and the clerk are hereby authorized and
directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a
contract with the Commisioner of Transportation prescribing the
terms and conditions of such contracts in the form as set forth
and contained in "Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency
Agreement" a copy of which said agreement was before the Council,
assuming on behalf of the City all of the obligations therein
contained.
(SEAL)
(Submit in duplicate)
Note: Attach certification by City Clerk with each copy of resolution
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City
of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing
Resolution was duly.adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular
Meeting of January 5, 1987 and as recorded in Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 12th day of January, 1987.
Page No. 16
CITY OF EDINA RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
BY
Mayor Director, Office of State Aid
Attest: Date
City Clerk
Date
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: STATE OF MINNESOTA
BY
Commissioner of Transportation
DATE DATE
(Seal)
J
(Submit in Duplicate)
Page No. 15 -
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Membe
FROM: Kenneth Rosland E A
SUBJECT: ADVERTISING ON BUS.SHELTERS
DATE: December 30, 1986
VIII.E
Attached is a letter from the Metropolitan Transit Commission requesting
the City's opinion concerning the placing of advertising on public
right -of -way bus shelters.
Also attached is a memo from Harold Sand who has researched our ordinances
and has offered an opinion.
The staff and I concur with the fact that we don't believe that advertising
on bus shelters would be appropriate for the City of Edina. Therefore, the
recommendation is that this advertising not be allowed.
KR /sw
Attachment
M E T R O P O L I T A N T R A N S I T C O M M I S S I O N
560 -6th Avenue North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55411 -4398 612/349 -7400
December 3, 1986
Mr. Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Mr. Rosland:
The MTC is currently in the process of deciding whether to reactivate its
shelter development program. As you may know, the MTC's shelter develop-
ment program was suspended a few years ago due to the high cost of maintain-
ing shelters once they are built.
One option the MTC is exploring is to allow for advertising on MTC bus
shelters either by leasing the shelter to a private company which specializes
in bus shelter advertising such as Transtop or for the MTC to contract directly
for advertising on shelters similar to the on -board bus advertising contract
the MTC currently has with Winston - Network. The advertising revenue would
be used to offset the cost of maintaining the shelters.
Minnesota Statutes 160.27, Subd. 2, provides that the decision to allow the
placement of shelters with advertising on public right -of -way rests with
the road authority in which the shelter is located. Specifically, this statute
provides that advertising may be placed on shelters if authorized by the
road authority through permit, license or franchise.
The purpose of this letter is to inquire whether your city code has in place
a permit, licensing or franchise process that would allow for advertising
on bus shelters? If not, would your city be receptive to allowing the MTC
to place advertising on its shelters within your jurisdiction? What type of
restrictions, terms and conditions would you envision for placing advertising
on MTC bus shelters in your city?
I look forward to your response to our inquiry and wish to thank you in advance
for your assistance in this matter.
If you should have any questions, please feel free to call me at 349 -7501.
Sincerely,
Gregory L. Fador
Executive Assistant
GLF /dmk
cc: John J. Capell
John R. Farrell
ivl E M O R A N D U ki
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City :tanager
FROM: Harold Sand, Planner
SUBJECT: MTC request for information about Edina
regulations governing advertising on
public bus stop shelters
DATE: December 5, 1986
The Edina Sign Ordinance No. 45i does not permit advertising
signs on bus stop shelters. The ordinance defines "bench sign"
as a sign affixed to a bench at a bus stop (Section 2.t.). The
general provisions permit bench signs only at bus stops and
prohibits bench signs in residential (zoning) districts (Section
3.t). The distinction between a bench and shelter may, at first,
seem to be minor, however, there are some real problems defining
a "shelter."
A lose definition may encourage private parties to request
miniature billboards in locations with little or no demand for a
bus stop shelter. Even with the discussion limited to the
existing public shelters, there is a significant question about
the size and location of advertising.
The Sign Ordinance has several other sections that have an
impact on advertising signs:
* All signs except governmental signs are prohibited in the
public street right4ottway including the boulevard (section
3.c). Governmental signs are limited to traffic directional
signs (section 2.k).
* Ott -site (advertising) signs are prohibited in all districts.
(section 3.a); except the five temporary bill boards on the east
side of Fiance (section 4)
Ntany shelter locations may also be controlled by specific
location requirements in the ordinance:
.* I Signs are prohibited within 25 feet of street or driveway
intersections to preserve a clear view of approaching pedestrians
and vehicles. bus shelters tend to be located near
intersections; fortunately they generally use transparent walls
which will minimize the obstruction. However, advertising signs
will aggravate the obstruction. The 25 toot spacing assumes a
clear boulevard and advertising on bus shelters may create
problems in situations not covered by the 25 toot rule.
* Signs may not be located within 50 teet of a trattic sign or
signal unless there is a tinding that the sign will not interfere
with the ability of the public to see the trattic sign or signal
and the sign will not distract the attention of drivers. This
restriction is not a serious problem with benches that generally
rise 2 -3 teet above ground because most trattic signs are 7 or
more teet above ground. However, signs on a shelter can be a
ditterent matter.
Bus stop - benches are presently allowed in the city with an
annual licensing tee of $10.00 per bench. United States Bench
Company is the only company that serves the metropolitan area and
they maintain 46 locations in Edina. The company is generally
very good about repairs and correcting any problems that arise.
However, during the winter, snow is cleared to make the
advertising panel visible but not cleared'to allow seating on the
bench. This indicates the company is strictly interested in the
advertising value of the bench rather that the public service
aspect.
Recently, a new company, Continental Ad Bench, started
placing advertising benches at the Camelot (Normandale) Golt
Course. The benches were installed without permits and later
variances were granted to permit the benches. They will be
licensed next year for $10.00 per bench. One bench per tee is
permitted and the advertisement is allowed on one side, Lacing
the interior of the course.
Advertising with signage is a very inexpensive way to gain
high exposure thus the pressure on the Sign Ordinance is very
great. The principal advertising on bus shelters and benches
seems to be for cigarettes, liquor, real estate tirms and
financial institutions. The bench and shelter advertising is
primarily used for name recognition and does not provide any
identification or location intormation. This creates untair
competition for proper identification (on premise signage) of
local businesses and buildings.
The sign ordinance was intended to allow adequate on -site
identification of local, businesses and buildings, to avoid
competition between signs and avoid excessive visual intormation
available to persons on the public rights -ot -way. In most cases
the ordinance requires a to toot setback trom the right -ot-way
line for signs on private property. The bus stop bench and
shelter advertising signs are typically located on the street
right- otTway and benetit trom closer proximity to trattic and
theretore greater visibility than some on= premise identification
signs. 'Phis system gives advertising signs the highest priority
when identitication signs deserve highest priority. The
advertising signs create untair competition for local business
identitication and may spur unnecessary sign competition.
The public bus shelters in Edina were not designed to
include advertising like the new shelters in Minneapolis, The
addition of advertising panels will be ditticult to integrate
with the design, will degrade the appearance and add to visual
clutter in the street environment. Some existing bus shelters in
Edina were donated and paid for by private tunds and some were
architecturally designed to contorm to the design of adjacent
building.
The public advantages of this type of advertising are minimal
compared to the public detriment and blighting intluences. I
think it is bad public policy to allow this commercial intrusion
and commercial use ot,the rightwot -way. The tinancial benetits
to the MTC are small compared to the potential public detriment.
VIII.F
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Leslie Turner
SUBJECT: TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP ON CITY ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
DATE: January 2, 1987
From time to time, members of the Council have discussed limiting the
number of terms an individual can serve on a board /commission. I think
we should discuss this issue again at our January 5, 1987, Council Meeting
before new members are appointed for terms beginning February 1, 1987.
I recommend that
there be a limit to the number of terms an
individual
can serve as specifically identified
below, in
order to open
up involvement
by more citizens
in City government. This is not a criticism
of those who
are now serving.
They have done
and are doing
an excellent
job. We may
wish to "grandfather" those now
serving, although it would
lengthen con-
siderably the implementation of
the proposed change.
CURRENT
PROPOSED
BD. /COMM.
ORDINANCE
LENGTH OF TERM
LIMIT
LIMIT
CD & PC
803
3 years
12 years
3 -3 yr. terms
Park Bd.
1221
3 years "shall
serve
2 -3 yr. terms
for 3 yrs."
Bd. of Appeals
825
3 years
None
2 -3 yr. terms
Bldg. Const.
407
3 years
None
2 -3 yr. terms
Human Relations
106
3 years
None
2 -3 yr. terms
SHHS
Jt. Powers
2 years
None
Recycling
107
2 years
None
3 -2 yr. terms
Heritage Pres.
802 -A2
2 years
None
3 -2 yr. terms
Health
2 years
None
3 -2 yr. terms
Traffic Safety
None
None 3 -yr. terms for citizen
members; 2 terms
Art Center
3 years
None
2 -3 yr. terms
January 2, 1987
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
I also recommend that the Council hear formally from each board /commission once
a year at a regular Council Meeting. We could ask for an "annual report" and
goals for the coming year and communicate our plans /comments, etc.
I also recommend that every new member be formally oriented both to the purpose
and responsibilities of the particular commission and to the function and
procedures of City government.
LT /sw
VIII.F.
CHARLES R. PODAS 6
td
EDINA TOWERS
8400 BARRIE ROAD
EDINA, MN 88433
PH: 812/922.9472
January 3, 1987
Mr. David A. Velde, Sanitarian
CITY OF EDINA HEALTH DEPARTMENT
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota, 55424
Dear David:
You may consider this as my Official Resignation
from the City of Edina Occupational Health Advis-
ory Task Force, effective January 1, 1987.
After "soul searching ", I feel that whatever Expertise
that I have to offer, could be better applied to other
Committees of the City of Edina, such as Traffic Safety,
or Building Construction Appeals Board.
Perhaps, you, or others may want to give this some
thought.
I remain,
IX.A
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale
National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest
Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis,
MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest,
Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are
designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina,
County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1988.
ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1987.
IX.B
•SIGNATORY RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer
of the City of Edina be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this munici-
pality in the transaction of any banking business with First Edina National Bank,
First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity
State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and
Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time
and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against
said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City
Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any
checks against such account which is signed as above described, whether or not
said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, any officer
or officers of the City, including the signer or signers of the check.
ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1987.
IX.0
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF
FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons:
C. WAYNE COURTNEY - MAYOR
KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER
JOHN WALLIN - CITY TREASURER
on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers or other orders of public
funds deposited in First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank,
Americana _''tate Bank of Edina, Southwest Fid.clity State Bank, First National Bank
of Minneapolis and No nvest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that each
of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any such instru-
ment bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate and to charge
the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn, as fully as though
it bore his manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be .
wholly perative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile
signature shall have been affixed without his authority.
ADOPTED this 5th day.of January,.1987:
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, Marcella M. Daehn, duly appointed City Clerk for the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, do hereby certify that I have compared the foregoing copy of "Resolution
Authorizing Use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials" with the original
thereof as recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council held Monday,
January 5, 1987, and that the same is a true and correct copy of said original
record, and that said Resolution was adopted by said City Council at said Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of January, 1987.
City Clerk
AUTHORIZATION OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS:
We, C. Wayne Courtney, Kenneth E. Rosland and John Wallin, being the Mayor, City_
Manager and City Treasurer, respectively, and being duly authorized to sign checks,
drafts, warrants, warrant - checks, vouchers and other orders on public funds thereof
deposited in the above named DEPOSITORY BANKS, do hereby certify that the facsimile
impressed or appended on this page is a facsimile of our signatures in the form
which may be used on any such instrument in place of our manually written signatures,
and we hereby authorize said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing
the facsimile of our signatures in said form and to charge the same to the account
of said public body in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it
bore our manually written signatures. Instruments so honored shall be wholly
operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile
signature shall have been affixed without our authority.
WITNESS:
Mayor
City Manager
City Treasurer
IX. D.1
First Bank
Edina
N'.
First Edina National Bank
4100 West 50th Street • Edina, MN 55424 • 612 - 925 -7300
Vemon Avenue Office
5116 Vernon Avenue • Edina, MN 55436 612 - 925 -7400
January 2, 1987
Mr. John Wallin
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear John:
RE: Pledged Securities for City of Edina Deposits
Enclosed you will find an investment portfolio pledge report dated
November 30, 1986 for GP 20, which is the City of Edina. You will
notice as of November 30, 1986 the bank had five securities totalling
$1,615,000 (par value) pledged to your account. The corresponding
market value and book value of these securities total $1,671,158.18
and $1,650,298.24 respectively. This portfolio consists of one
Treasury Bill for $1,000,000 and four Municipal Bonds.
First Edina National Bank certifies that there have been no additions
or deletions to your portfolio since November 30, 1986. However,
it is possible that the market and book values have changed slightly
as market conditions vary from day to day.
I hope that this letter along with the November pledge report will
be sufficient for your January Board Meeting, as soon as I receive
the 12/31/86 pledge report, I will forward it to you immediately.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please
contact me any time at 925 -7352.
Sincerely,
Kevin M. Powers
Assistant Vice President
KMP /lap
Enclosure
Member First Bank System, Member FDIC
56 -0148 BANK 056 -114 CUST 101230 FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DATE 11/30/86 PAGE 8
IV110 11/26/86 MONTH -END MPLS MN PLEDGE REPORT 11/30/86 TYPE 4
SK
GPI
SECURITY
RECEIPT
SK RCPT.
PAR VALUE
DESCRIPTION
COUP.
MAT DTE
MDY
S &P
MKT. VALUE
BOOK VALUE
02
1
912827TE2
012238
012238
1,000.000.00
J S TREASURY NOTES
8.000
2/15/89
1.034,375
1,031.848.56
8 NOTE 0 89
04
3
*130619GG8
006080
140.000.00
ALIFORNIA ST
6.700
2/01/95
AA
148,221
139,790.93
02
3
412486JR4
033460
150,000.00
AARFORD CNTY MD
6.200
9/01 87
1
151,286
150,619.50
02
3
*649857T82
000010
125,000.00
qEW YORK ST HSG FIN AGY
4.600
5/01/87
AA
124,471
124,989.58
02
3
686070TN3
060590
200,000.00
3REGON ST
7.000
61/01/95
Al
212,803
203,049.67
0 20
ITEMS
5 PLEDGEE
TOTAL
1,615,000.
DO
1,671.158.18
1.650.298.24
275,000.30
PLEDGED MUNIS UNDER 2 YRS
275,757.92
275,609.08
340,000.00
PLEDGED MUNIS OVER 2 YRS
361,025.26
-F-I
342,840.60
i.000,000.00
PLEDGED GOVERNMENTS
1,034,375.00
L-H
1.031,848.56
T••
56 -0a. BANK 056 -115 CUST 101240 FIRST BANK SOUTHDALE INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO ( DATE 12/31, PAGE 4
IV110 12/30/86 MONTH -END EDINA MN PLEDGE REPORT _ 12/31/8b TYPE 4
SK
GP
SECURITY
RECEIPT
SK RCPT.
PAR VALUE
DESCRIPTION
COUP.
MAT DTE
MDY
S &P
MKT. VALUE
BOOK VALUE
02
1
*912827SC7
007781
200,000.00
JS TREASURY NOTES
9.750
4/30/87
202,312
200,160.88
9 3/4 NOTE U 87
04
3
059185JB5
060360
200,000.00
BALTIMORE MD
5.900
10/15/93
Al
201,395
199,734.76
04
3
075005MX3
009640
50,000.00
BEAVER CNTY PA NEW PUB HSG
5.250
DG/01/95
AAA
47,735
50,617.00
AUTH VANPORT
04
3
122457VGG
060320
150,000.00
BURNSVILLE MINN
5.700
2/01/94
A
145,043
149,792.50
04
3
*223770CK2
096710
35,000.00
OWLITZ CNTY WASH
5.100
D7/01/90
Al
34,904
35.017.50
04
3
24418lCEI
060270
50,000.00
)EER RIVER MINN INDPT SCH DIST
5.750
2/01/94
BAAl
47,628
49,890.50
NO 317
04
3
296803MY2
060400
150,000.00
ESSEX CNTY NJ
6.600
6/01 94
AA
157,585
157,295.50
04
3
419778AD7
074230
150,000.00
HAWAII ST
5.900
2/01/94
AA
151,532
149,691.00
04
31
688443RP7
077060
150,000.00
OSSEO MINN INDPT SCH DIST
5.750
1/01/94
A
145,671
149,778.00
NO 279
03
3
986018BOI
010580
100,000.00
YOLO CNTY CALIF FLOOD CTL &
4.750
2/01/87
A
99,283
99,996.83
WTR CONSV DIST ZONE NO 4
15
ITEMS
10 PLEDGEE
TOTAL
F1,235,000.
0
X1,233,092.08
1,241.974.47
100,000.00
PLEDGED MUNIS UNDER 2 YRS
99,283.51
99,996.83
935,000.00
PLEDGED MUNIS OVER 2 YRS
931,496.07
941,816.76
200.000.00
PLEDGED GOVERNMENTS
202,312.50
200,160.88
D
s ?
OO
boa
30a
f3
6
/
-
01
1+ / / O\ ."ice / ___ .. 7 r.vN
V.
Current Assets
Cash:
Demand Deposits
Working Fund
Contracts Receivable
Inventory:
Liquor
Wine
Beer and Nix
Prepaid Expenses:
Unexpired Insurance
Supplies
LIQUOR FUND
BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
As at November 30, 1986
Assets
$ 116,827.04
3,800.00 120,627.04
29,840.03
350,876.05
328,640.97
35,978.09 715,495.11
.00
400.00 400.00
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 866,362.18
Fixed Assets:
Land
Land Improvements
Buildings
Furniture and Fixtures
Leasehold Improvements
Less: Allowance for Depreciation
and Amortization
Current Liabilities:
Trade Accounts Payable
Accrued Pauroll
Due To Other Funds
Surplus — Unappropriated
233,784.60
23,923.14
729,205.87
309,444.14
3,035.55
1,065,608.70
558,214.30 507,394.40 741,179.00
TOTAL ASSETS $1,607,541.18
Liabilities and Surplus
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SURPLUS
S 118,078.17
8,112.57
540.14
126,730.88
1,480,810.30
$1,607,541.18
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
`MPARATIVE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSE
CITY OF EDINA
Eleven Months Ending November 30, 1986 and November 30, 1985 �.
INCREASE
1986 1985 (DECREASE)
50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total 50th Street Yorkdale Grandview Total TOTAL
SALES:
282,341.63
254,531.10
770,249.60
188,588.68
231,406.39
203,254.82
623,249.89
146.999.71
713,240.66
Liquor
;400,917.74
; 849,022.92
; 797,475.91
;2,047,416.57
$ 438,121.94
; 890,491.63
; 840,500.75
;2,169,114.32
;(121,697.75)
Wine
301,265.89
536,198.56
487,369.38
1,324,833.83
309,436.79
544,922.12
491,074.07
1,345,432.98
(20,599.15)
Beer
248,959.56
443,633.77
417,053.07
1,109,646.40
237,295.93
420,748.68
399,880.92
1,057,925.53
51,720.87
Mix & Miscellaneous
16,221.63
33,751.43
33,604.11
83,577.17
16,731.75
34,409.31
34,716.70
85,857.76
(2,280.59)
375.093.43
967,364.82
1,862,606.68
1,735,502.47
4,565,473.97
1,001,586.41
1,890,571.74
1,766,172.44
4,658,330.59
(92,856.62)
Less: Bottle Refunds
& Discounts 21.456.41
51,172.45
50,071.42
122,7.00.28
23,524.35
55,773.49
54,445.70
133,743.54
(11,043.26)
NET SALES
945,908.41
1,811,434.23
1,685,431.05
4.442,773.69
978.062.06
1,834,798.25
1.711,726.74
4.524.587.05
(81.813.36)
COST OF SALES:
Inventory - January I
Purchases
Inventory - November 30
GROSS PROFIT
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Selling
Overhead
Administrative
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
NET OPERATING PROFIT
OTHER INCOME:
Cash Discounts
Cash Over (Short)
Income on Investments
Other
NET INCOME
PERCENT TO NET SALES:
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Operating Profit
Other Income
NET INCOME
233,376.87
282,341.63
254,531.10
770,249.60
188,588.68
231,406.39
203,254.82
623,249.89
146.999.71
713,240.66
1.437.701.42
1,317.083.46
3.468.025.54
869,705.50
1,551,397.19
1,452.945.81
3,874.048.50
(406,022.96)
946.617.53
1.720,043.05'
1,571,614.56
4.238,275.14
1.058.294.18
1.782.803.58
1,656,200.63
4,491.298.39
(259.023.25)
207,763.51
280.712.12
227,019.48
715.495.11
293,949.00
323,098.76
295.527.47
912.575.23
(197,080.12)
738.854.02
1,439.330.93
1,344.595.08
3.522.780.03
764.345.18
1.459.704.82
1.360.673.16
3,584.123.16
(61.943.13)
207.054.39
372.103.30
340,835.97
919.993.66
213,716.88
375.093.43
351,053.58
939.863.89
(19.870.23)
50.585.25
108,177.68
94.535.28
253,298.21
55.561.10
119.892.04
91,296.10
266,749.24
(13.451.03)
30.850.38
40.709.35
36.112.08
107.671.81
32.938.12
40.853.14
36.706.85
110.498.11
(2.826.30)
75,648.26
110,563.74
87,253.29
273.465.29
75,487.45
97,845.52
78,997.91
252.330.88
21.134.41
157.083.89
259.450.77
217,900.65
634.435.31
163.986.67
258.590.70
207,000.86
629.578.23
4.857.08
49.970.50
112.652.53
122.935.32
285,558.35
49.730.21
116.502.73
144.052.72
310,285.66
(24.727.31)
8.906.59
17,224.65
16.242.21
42,373.45
11.458.69
20.575.00
18.795.47
50,829.16
(8.455.71)
18.22
(425.72)
118.51
(288.99)
(4.19)
(497.35)
3.19
(498.35)
209.36
-0-
-O-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
236.58
599.72
478.88
1.315.18
743.90
171.39
464.43
1.379.72
(64.54)
9,161.39
17,398.65
16.839.60
43.399.64
12.198.40
20.249.04
19.263.09
51,710.53
(8,310.89)
59.131.89
saaamaaaaas
; 130.051.18
saasaaaaaaaaa
; 139,174.92
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
; 328,957.99
aaaaassaaaaaa
; 61.928.61
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
; 136,751.77
aaasaa aaaass=
; 163,315.81
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
; 361,996.19
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
; (33,038.20)
aaaaa.sssaaa
21.89%
20.54%
20.22%
20.71%
21.85%
20.44%
20.51%
20.77%
16.61
14.32
12.93
14.28
16.77
14.09
12.09
13.91
5.28
6.22
7.29
6.43
5.08
6.35
8.42
6.86
.97
.96
1.00
.98
1.25
1.10
1.13
1.14
6.25%
aaaaaaaaaaa
7.18%
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
8.29%
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
7.40%
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
6.33%
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
7.45%
aaaaa = _aaaaa=
9.54%
xaaaaaaaaaasa
8.00%
aaaaaaaaaaaaa
' DECEMBER 1986
PERMITS PERMIT FEE PLAN CHECK SUR CH.
NEW HOUSEKEEPING UNITS
2 1,454.00 945.11 125.00
Two Family Dwellings
201.53
122.25
1.00
449.78
SAC VALUE
950 250,000
395,225
241,200
2,000
950 1 888,425
PENALTY
None
_ --
Townhouses
None
Apartments or Condos
None
NEW NON- RESIDENTIAL
None
_-
ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS &
INSTALLATIONS
Non- Residential
22 3,701.00
2,395.92
Residential
12 2,166.00
1,246.06
DEMOLITIONS
None
MOVES
None
GARAGES
None
AUXILLARY BLDGS.
None
-_
POOLS
None
-
DRAIN TILES
45.00
-
TENNIS COURTS
None
- -
FENCES
f
None
TOTALS
37 7,366.00
4,587.09
201.53
122.25
1.00
449.78
SAC VALUE
950 250,000
395,225
241,200
2,000
950 1 888,425
PENALTY
DECEMBER 1986 PAGE (1)
DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT# ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE
12 -1 -86 Patio Village W -833
12 -1 -86 Lowell Frost W -834
12 -1 -86 Victor Fridlund W -835
& Son
12 -1 -86 Gary Kiecker W -836
12 -2 -86 Benjamin Const. W -837
12 -2 -86 Weis Bldrs. W -838
12 -5 -86 Northland Sunrooms W -839
Ltd.
I
12 -3 -86 SCI Services of W -840
MPLS
I
12 -3 -86 Branko Kastratovich W -841
12 -3 -86 S.C.I. Srivices of W -842
MPLS
12 -3 -86 Ryan Const. W -843
12 -4 -86 Sonnen Bros. Const. W -844
12 -4 -86 Winfield Const. W -845
5929 Kellogg Ave.
Construct porch addit-
19- 028 -24 -42 -0113
ion. 126.00
Plan check 81.9r
Sur ch. 5.25
Value 10,500.00
5801 Beard Ave.
Install bay window.
20- 028 -24 -31 -0093
45.00
Sur ch. 1.00
Value 2,000.00
5704 Drew Ave. So.
Add to garage. 99.00
20- 028 -24 -23 -0107
Sur ch. 4.00
Value 8,000.00
6904 Cornelia Dr.
Bathroom remodel in
30- 028 -24 -43 -0005
master bedroom.
54.00
Plan check 35.10
Sur ch. 1.50
Value 3,000.00
4510 W. 77th St. #216
Remodel office.
81.00
Plan check 52.65
Sur ch. 3.00
Value 6,000.00
6930 York Ave.
Remodel store
278.86
Plan check 180.70
Sur ch. 14.16
Value 28,325.00
5737 York Ave. So.
Dining room addition
20- 028 -24 -24 -0017
81.00
Plan check 52.65
Sur ch. 3.00
Value 6,000.00
6600 France Ave #630
Remodel existing space
30- 028 -24 -41 -0001
as per plans. 108.00
Plan check 70.20
Sur ch. 4.35
Value 8,700.00
6528 Sherwood Ave.
Construct Single
30- 028 -24 -23 -0087
Family Dwelling.
709.00
Plan check 461.18
Sur ch. 60.00
Sac Unit (1) 475.00
Value 120,000.00
7215 Ohms Lane
Office Remodel.
513.50
Plan check 333.78
Sur ch. 36.00
Value 72,000.00
7401 Metro Blvd. #405
Office Remodel.
09- 116 -21 -31 -0017
189.00
Plan check 122.85
Sur ch. 8.67
Value 17,000.00
4916 Maple Drive
Construct dormer
18- 028 -24 -14 -0091
addition & finish
partial basement.
336.50
Plan check 218.73
Sur ch. 19.00
Value 38,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Construct 3 storerooms
in basement.
DECEMBER 1986
DATE CONTRACTOR
PAGE (2)
PERMIT# ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE
12 -4 -86 Arachne Const. W -846
12 -5 -86 Niwinski Const. W -847
12 -5 -86 McGough Const. Inc. W -848
12 -5 -86 Terry Vogt W -849
12 -5 -86 Condor Const. Corp. W -850
12 -8 -86 Winfield Const. W -851
12 -8 -86 Winfield Const. W -852
12 -8 -86 Windield Const. W -853
12 -8 -86 D.C. Const. W -854
12 -8 -86 Karkela Const. W -855
12 -10 -86 Swedenborg W -856
12- 12 -86- Winfield Const. W -857
7700 France Ave. 4th F1.
Office Remodel
31- 028 -24 -44 -0011
81.00
Plan ch -,�ck 52.65
Sur ch. 3.00
Value 6,000.00
6545 France Ave.
Build walls as show on
(Benson's Optical)
plans & remodel of
29- 028 -24 -23 -0006
rooms accross hall.
330.00
Plan check 214.50
Sur ch. 18.50
Value 30,000.00
8000 W. 78th St. #310
Finish tenant space
18- 116 -21 -12 -0027
as per plans. 258.50
Plan check 168.03
Sur ch. 13.00
Value 26,000.00
4250 France Ave.
Enclose existing
07- 028 -24 -41 -0010
screen porch & Bookcase
90.00
Sur ch. 3.50
Value 7,000.00
4445 W. 77th Street
Finish office space
31- 028 -24 -43 -0013
as per plans. 81.00
Plan check 52.65
Sur ch. 3.00
Value 6,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Tenant finish- 300 sq.
(4th F1. American T.Air)
ft. 63.00
Plan check 40.95
Sur ch. 2.00
Value 4,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Tenant finish -1100 sq.
2nd Floor "Especially
ft. 153.00
for Children"
Plan check 99.45
Sur ch. 7.00
Value 14,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Tenant finish -920 sq.
4th Floor "Together
ft. 135.00
Dating"
Plan check 87.75
Sur ch. 6.00
Value 12,000.00
3400 W. 66th St.
Office Remodel.
1st Floor
54.00
9- 028 -24 -23 -0012
Plan check 35.10
Sur ch. 1.25
Value 2,500.00
7400 Metro Blvd.
Office Remodel.
3rd Floor
108.00
09- 116 -21 -31 -0013
Plan check 70.20
SW: ch. 4.50
Value 9,000.00
3930 W. 49' Street
Office Remodel.
18- 028 -24 -14 -0026
162.00
Plan check 105.30
Sur ch. 7.50
Value 15,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Tenant finish -6400
2nd Floor
sq. ft. 554.00
Plan check 360.10
Sur ch. 40.50
Value 81,000.00
DECEMBER 1986
PAGE (3)
DATE CONTRACTOR PERMIT# ADDRESS & DESCRIPTION TYPE & VALUE
12 -9 -86 Northwestern W -858
Builders
12 -10 -86
Waterproofing by
w -859
story additon.
Experts
189.00
12 -12 -86
Winfield Const.
W -860
X12 -11 -86
Haymaker Const.
W -861
i
12 -12 -86
Sonitrol of the
W -862
system. 45.00
Twin Cities
Sur ch. 1.00
12 -15 -86
S & LP Bldrs.
W -863
12 -15 -86
Plato Kitchens
W -864
12 -16 -86
Wally Irwin
W -865
12 -17 -86
Don Berg Const.
W -866
12 -22 -86 KNR Electrics W -867
12 -22 -86 KNR Elctrics W -868
304 Van Buren
Construct second
30- 117- 21 - -21 -0050
story additon.
189.00
Plan c heck 122.85
Sur ch. 9.00
Value 18,000.00
5331 Kellogg Ave.
Install drain tile
18- 028 -24 -43 -0070
system. 45.00
Sur ch. 1.00
Value 2,000.00
3300 Edinborough Way
Tenant Finish -2200 sq.
1st Floor (Beauty Salon)
ft. 271.50
32- 028 -24 -34 -0027
Plan check 176.48
Sur ch. 14.00
Value 28,000.00
5125 Vernon Ave. So.
Construct additon &
28- 117 -21_31 -0055
Remodel store fronts.
639.50
Plan check 415.68
Sur ch. 50.00
Value 100,000.00
6750 Valley View Rd.
Install equipment
05- 116 -21 -32 -0001
to monitor existing
fire alarm. 15.00
Sur ch. .50
Value 500.00
5520 Malibu Drive
Construct Addition.
31- 117 -21 -22 -0030
117.00
Plan check 76.05
Sur ch. 5.00
Value 10,000.00
6105 Crescent Drive
Misc. Remodel of
312 -1 7 -21 -44 -0058
kitchen. 15.00
Sur ch. .50
Value 900.00
6020 Schaefer Ro d
Construct single Tamil\
31- 117 -21 -44 -003
dwelling. 744.50
Plan check 483.93
Sur ch. 65.00
Sac Unit (1) 475.00
Value 130,000.00
4116
1 'de
Construct Addition.
28u 2n4Y
459.50
Plan check 298.68
Sur ch. 30.00
Value 60,000.00
6645 McCauley Trail
Install fire alarm
system. 54.00
Plan check 35.10
Sur ch. 1.50
Value 3,000.00
5010 Summit Ave.
Install fire alarm
system. 63.00
Plan check 40.95
Sur ch. 1.75
Value 3,500.00
12 -MONTH RE -CAP (BUILDING PERMITS)
1986
"PERMITS PERMIT FEE
PLAN CHECK
SUR CH.
SAC
VALUE
NEW HOUSEKEEPING [!NITS
40 38,240.00
24,856.45
3,771183
17,100
7,544,137
Two Family Dwellings
11 11,664.50
7,347.95
1,159.60
9,975
2,319,200
Townhouses
41 22,563.71
14,666.45
2,979.20
22,800
5,958,374
Apartments or Condos
6 56,589.00
36,782.88
7,184.84
134,425
23,789,589
NEW NON- RESIDENTIAL
5 42,330.00
27,514.52
4,126.15
41,325
18,034,760
ADDITIONS, ALTERATIONS, REPAIRS 6
INSTALLATIONS
Non - Residential
327 69,776.48
45,010.35
4,764.48
5,700
9,572,028
Residential'
392 50,150.25
30,145.65
2,524.41
4,927,749
DEMOLITIONS
11 550.00
MOVES
200.00
GARAGES
16
1,203.00
781.95
43.05
86,100
AUXILLARY BLDGS.
5
160.15
79.30
4.75
8,900
POOLS
17
2,764.00
1,796.60
157.80
305,600
DRAIN TILES
18
848.75
19.06
34,455
TENNIS COURTS
NONE
FENCES
2
99.00
35.10
2.25
4,500
TOTALS 297,138.84 189,017.20 26,737.42
895 231,325 72,585,392
PENALTY
t
.. a
149.00
MINNESOTA NBA BASKETBALL
5525 Cedar Lake Road
Minneapolis, MN 55416
612 -544 -DUNK.
December 17, 1986
City Council
RE: Minnesota NBA Basketball
Dear Council Members:
As you know, we have been working hard to bring exciting NBA
Basketball back to Minnesota. It has been 26 years since the
Lakers left, and our chances are excellent for an NBA franchise
to be awarded April 20, 1987, when the league has committed to
announce expansion sites.
In order to maximize the input of our fans, we have had a
"Name The Team" contest which ended December 15. After only one
advertisement, we received suggestions from over 5,500 people!
We have decided upon two finalists, and want to.ask for your help
in choosing the eventual team name. We see your council and the
other city councils throughout Minnesota as representatives of
all parts of our state. Each council has one vote, and we hope
that you will consider the two name alternatives and write us
with your choice at the address above by January 9. The majority
will rule, and the choice of the most city councils will be our
NBA team name.
You should know that we have tried to select names which are
marketable, consider the personality of our state and its people,
and reflect on the geography, recreational opportunities and
other unique characteristics of Minnesota. The two choices are:
1. Minnesota Polars, or
2. Minnesota Timber Wolves.
Thank you for taking the time to help us choose a name for
the NBA team which will soon represent our great state.
Sincerely,
MINNESOTA NBA BASKETBALL
Ha a Ratne 4rvblfseon Robert A. Stein
* *Minnesota NBA Basketball is a Division of
Northwest Racquet, Swim & Health Clubs, Inc. **