HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-02-02_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 2, 1987
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meeting of January 26, 1987 approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
I. AWARD OF BID - Public Works Garage /Parking Facility
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
AWARD OF HONOR - "Teddy Bear" for DeHarpp6rte Family
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterisk ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. Therewill be
no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so
requests, in.which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Year -End Meeting of December 30, 1986 and Regular
Meeting of January 5, 1987
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close
hearing. If Council wishes . to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/4 favorable rollcall
vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Cascade Lane Berming & Lift Station
IV. INFORMAL HEARING ON STREET DESIGN.
A. West 50th Street from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats,
Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final
Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat Approval
1. White Oaks 8th Addition - Generally located west of Townes Road and
south of Sunnyside Road (Contd from 1/26/87)
B. Second Reading - Zoning Change
1. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District -
R. Hawthorne - Generally located immediately north of Crosstown Highway
and east of Peacedale Avenue
2. R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District and
HPD Heritage Preservation Overlay District - 5312 Interlachen Boulevard
C. Lot Division
1. 6-�s3'o-Gleason Court
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. (CONTD)
D. Set Hearing Dates (2/23/87)
* 1. Fairview Southdale Hospital - 6401 France Avenue South - To construct
a new medical office building
* 2. Conditional Use Permit - Colonial Church - Generally located north of
Crosstown Highway and west of Colonial Way ,
* 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Warden Acres Dahle Replat - Generally located
.south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue
4. Preliminary Plat Approval - Robert Griffith - Generally located north of
Braemar Blvd and east and west of Valley View Road
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Repair of Well #2 (Wooddale)
* B. Pedestrian Bridge - Braemar Golf Course
* 0. Tennis Courts - Lewis and Cornelia Parks
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Report on Proposed Airport Noise Budget Ordinance
B. Report and Recommendation on Lawn Chemical Applicators
C. Update - I- 494 Corridor Study
D. Personnel Committee Report
B. Report on Mission Statement
F. Temporary 3.2 Beer License - Our Lady of Grace
G. Feasibility Report - Various Improvements
IX: RESOLUTIONS. Favorable rollcall vote by majority of quorum to pass.
*
A_ 1987 Laboratory Service Agreement for Hennepin County
X. SPECIAL BUSINESS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XII. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 212187: General Fund $163,057.02,
Park Fund $27.10, Art Center $440.12, Golf Course Fund $5,995.99, Recreation
Center Fund $449.62, Utility Fund $260,767.81, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$6,164.83, Construction Fund $6,426.08, Total $443,328.57
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Feb 16 PRESIDENTS' DAY
Mon
Feb
23
Regular
Council
Meeting
Mon
Mar
2
Regular
Council
Meeting
Mon
Mat
16
Regular
Council
Meeting
Sat
Mar
21
Council
Retreat
CITY HALL CLOSED
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
8:00 a.m. Braemar Clubhouse
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
JANUARY 26, 1987
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and
Courtney.
MINUTES OF DECEMBER 30, 1986 MEETING AMENDED.. Manager Rosland explained that
at the H.R.A. Meeting of December 30, 1986 the bid for round tables /dollies
was awarded to Adirondack, low bidder. Upon further review of the bids it was
determined that Adirondack's bid was conditional and therefore the bid was
actually awarded to General Office Products as the next lowest bidder. Motion
was made by Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner to approve
the H.R.A. Minutes of December 15, 1986 and January 5, 1987 as submitted and
to amend -the Minutes of December 30, 1986.to show award of bid for round
tables /dollies to General Office Products at $9,552.50.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONVEYANCE OF PHASE VI EDINBOROUGH CONDOMINIUMS APPROVED. Manager Rosland
recommended approval of the conveyance of Phase VI Edinborough Condomiums for
development at this time. Commissioner Kelly introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION RATIFYING AND AFFIRMING THE EXECUTION
OF VARIOUS OTHER DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment
Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows:
1. Recitals. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a
redevelopment plan, as defined in.Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, sub-
division 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ").
Acting.pursuant to the Plan, the HRA has acquired certain land in the area
included in the Plan and it has been proposed that the HRA sell and transfer a
portion of such land to the East Edina Housing Foundation (the "Foundation "),
pursuant to a Land Sale Agreement by and between the HRA and the Foundation
(the "Agreement "). By a resolution adopted May 6, 1985, the HRA approved the
form of the Agreement and authorized the Chairman and Secretary or Assistant
Secretary of the HRA to execute and deliver, the Agreement on behalf of the HRA
with such modifications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney
for the HRA and the Executive Director of the HRA. Pursuant to such authorization
the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA have executed and delivered the Agreement
to the Foundation. In connection with the transactions contemplated by the
Agreement there will be prepared and submitted to the HRA a Land Sale Agreement
and Contract for Private Redevelopment for Condominium Development Phase VI by
and between.the HRA, the Foundation and Edinborough Condominium Partnership
(the "Phase VI Agreement "), which will be similar to the Land Sale Agreement
and Contract for.Private Redevelopment for Condominium Development Phase V.
2. Authorization for Execution and Delivery of Documents. The terms and
provisions of the Phase VI Agreement are hereby approved subject to such modi-
fications as are deemed appropriate and approved by the attorney for the.HRA
and the Executive Director of the HRA, which approval shall be conclusively
.evidenced by the execution of such documents by the Chairman and Secretary or
Assistant Secretary of the HRA. The Chairman and Secretary or Assistant Secretary
of the HRA are directed to execute such documents as so modified. The Chairman
and Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the HRA are also authorized and directed
to execute such other instruments as may be required to accomplish the trans-
actions contemplated by such documents including, but not limited to, any
amendments or supplements to the Agreement, and such other agreements as may
be necessary to accomplish the transactions contemplated by the Agreement, as
amended. The execution of such documents and of any such amendments, supple-
ments or agreements by the Chairman and the Secretary or Assistant Secretary
H.R.A. Minutes of 1/26/87
Page Two
shall be conclusive evidence of the
accordance with this Resolution.
Dated as of the 26th day of January,
Attest:
Executive Director
approval of such documents by the HRA in
1987.
Chairman
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by
Commissioner Turner, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted
in favor thereof:
Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
and the following voted against the same:
None
whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the
Chairman and his signature attested by the Executive Director.
BID AWARDED FOR ACOUSTICAL SHELLS FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK. Mr. Rosland presented
the bid of Wenger Corporation at $9,251.00 for 12 Wenger Rollaway Acoustical
Shells Model #61ZGO as sole bidder. He explained that Wenger Corporation is
the only known manufacturer of this style of product and that this is the
industry standard. Motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner
Turner for award of bid to Wenger Corporation at $9,251.00 for the acoustical
shells.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR PLATFORM STAGING FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK. Mr. Rosland presented
bids for platform stage sections showing SICO Inc. at $8,266.50 and Wenger
Corporation at $9,172.00. Motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by
Commissioner Smith for award of bid to SICO Inc., low bidder, at $8,266.50
for platform staging.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR TOOLS AND MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK.
Mr. Rosland presented bids-for hand tools, power tools and miscellaneous equip-
ment for Edinborough Park, showing Sears at $5,385.45, Olson Chair and Cable
at $7,090.32 and Snap -On -Tools at $10,009.26. Motion of Commissioner Kelly was
seconded by Commissioner Turner for award of bid to Sears, low bidder, at
$5,385.45 for hand tools, power tools and miscellaneous equipment.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by
motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion.carried.
Executive Director
HRA I.
M E M 0 R A N D b M
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: .Award of Bid - Grandview Parking Ramp
and Public Works Building
DATE: January 30, 1987
On December 23, 1986 the HRA opened bids for the subject improvement.
As shown on the attached bid tabulation, James Steele Construction Company
was low bidder at $1,700,500 which was $73,500 below estimate. The break-
down of this bid between the parking ramp and public works garage is as
follows:
Ramp 1,284,400
Public Works Garage - 416,100
Total $1,700,500
At this writing, the final redevelopment contract and related documents with
Jerry's. Enterprises have not been 'executed due to travel commitments by
Jerry's officers. In that the subject bid expires prior to the next HRA
meeting, we recommend.award . to James Steele Construction Company with
the following conditions and contingencies which must be fulfilled.
1) Execution of the redevelopment contract with Jerry's
Exterprises.
2) Submission by Jerry's of.a:commitment:for financing the
construction of the shopping center expansion.
3) Execution of the Assessment Agreement and the Easement
and Parking Ramp Agreement.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
-TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gordon Hughes, H.R.A.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 29, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Parking Facility /Public Works Garage - H.R.A. Grandview Project
-Quotations/Bids:
Company
1. James Steele Construction
2. Sheehy Construction
3. Trucker
*See attached bid tabulation sheet for additional bids.
Department Recommendation:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 1,700,500.00
$ 1,725,300.00
$ 1,734,935.00
James Steele Construction $ 1,700,500.00
Award subject to Re velopm eCtract with Jerry's
H.R.A.
Signa ure Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid G is not
City Manager's Endorsement:
within the amount budget for the purchase.
u ) O
John Wallin, Finance Director
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
G
nneth nager
BID TABLUATIUN SHEET 1
PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE /PARKING FACILITY
CITY OF EDINA
EDINA, MINNESOTA
BID 11:00 A.M., DECEMBER 23, 1986 GENERAL, ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL
410 `Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
(612) 332 -PARK
(WALKER Commission 2123110/130)
BIDDERS
BASE BID
ALTERNATES
ADD #1
BID
SECURITY
REMARKS
—
1
Sealer
2
Delete
3
Delete
4
Topping
RECOMMENDATION
Up -Grade
Heat
Restroom
Level 2
BASE BID + ALT. 1 + ALT
j $ (_9000
`
3 I c% 00
1211.00
C. qon
G.I 000
✓
✓
$ 1,949,900
L�v�, ,-•
1 -l��,000
1 ILSvv
3 5* °°e
CL 1, Zoo
C. Soo
S11 Son
✓
✓
$ 1,871 300
;1-7, 00 0
1 IL DOS
3 —
, 3,adO
S,000
$9,00
✓
✓
$ 10882,000
�,�, • (
I,CoL�3oo
I_
s Is 000
58'0oo
6, so o
cLCL ooa
,
✓
✓
$ 1,725,300
4-,�
I,S'70, 000
1 _
3 Iz pDp
I I�000
5,000
IL-1000
✓'
✓
1,929,000
(�
1- G L
')
tT7 E3, 000
Z IS, �•eJ
'jam% 4,Oo
Ce �OO
SZ,000
✓
✓
$ 1,866,000
�
X000
1 -
1, IV = ° °'
3
1 I, DOO
'51000
54� 000
�
✓
$ 1,786,000
- c L c t- *
1, ce'7 [�., eo 0
1 -
3, o w s
5 5, 19
-(, 10
a i, S S O
✓
1/
rr
i�.�.(..',..��•, .�. -. l-..��
,1
1 , �� 4. 000
1 12 , So 0
t 231`nD
3 _
rj� Z..OI✓
X0000
4.S 7z>o
✓
$ 1,852,200
I Won°
✓
✓
d�/1,
1 -
c10" -100
✓
��
$ 1,985,990
Z 4-
11�4�,�,Boo
I
-L zt,a.'.,
1�,0so
S8 001c)
Z,Soo
-1,8oD
✓
$ 1,929,450
i5 ,
MINUTES
SPECIAL YEAR -END MEETING
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 29, 1986
Mayor Courtney called the meeting to order at 5:00 P. M. Answering rollcall
were Members Bredesen, Richards, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
WHITE OAKS 8TH ADDITION PRELIMINARY PLAT DISCUSSED. Mr. Rosland reported that
the City Council heard this preliminary plat on December 15. Since that time,
Mr. Kenneth Monroe, the owner of the property, had withdrawn his petition and
will be donating the land to the City. A resolution will be drawn up to accept
this piece of property as open space for drainage purposes and not as .a piece
of open park property. There was no further discussion.
INTERVIEWS FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported that
interviews for prospective Board and Commission members would be conducted in
January. She questioned the limitation of members' terms and will prepare a
memo for the January 5th Council Meeting in order to further discuss and evaluate
the terms of membership for Boards and Commissions. No action was taken.
CONCERN NOTED AT ARDEN PARK SKATING RINK. Member Bredesen explained that the
situation at Arden Park regarding hockey playing on the skating rink could result
in a serious injury. Mr. Rosland commented that there is a policy preventing
hockey on the rinks while open skating is going on. Whenever hockey occurs,
soft pucks are recommended. Mr. Kojetin, Director of Park and Recreation,
indicated that several communities have built separate rinks for hockey, increasing
maintenance needs. Mr. Rosland stated that in the meantime a double attendant
program would help to solve the problem at Arden Park.
KAY MC MILLAN'S DEATH NOTED. Mr. Rosland reported the death of Kay McMillan,
the wife of former Council Member, Hugh McMillan, who himself had passed away
a number of years ago. Sympathy to the family will be expressed on behalf of
the City Council.
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED EXPENDITURES AND RECOMMENDED TRANSFERS APPROVED. Mr. Rosland
presented the Statement of Estimated Expenditures and Recommended Transfers for
the Year Ended December 31, 1986 and recommended approval. Member Bredesen's
motion was seconded by Member Turner to approve the recommended transfers as
presented in the "Statement of Estimated Expenditures and Recommended Transfers
for.Year Ended December 31, 1986."
Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion of Member
of the following claims as per
Art Center, $4,345.23; Capital
Recreation Center Fund, $1,550
$231,716.08; Liquor Dispensary
$373,661.74.
Richards was seconded by Member Bredesen for payment
Pre -List dated 12/30/86: General Fund, $123,291.93;
Fund, $2,789.75; Golf Course Fund, $1,448.64;
.60; Gun Range Fund, $5,657.10; Utility Fund,
Fund, $2,808.91; Construction Fund, $53.50; Total,
There being no further business on the agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting
adjourned at 5:25 P. M.
Acting City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JANUARY 5, 1987
Answering rollcal;l were Members Richards, Smith and Turner. The meeting was
chaired by Member'Richards as Mayor Pro -Tem.
OATHS OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED. Oaths of office were administered by the City
Clerk to Frederick S. Richards and Glenn L. Smith who were elected to the office
of Council Member for terms of office to January 1, 1991.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS PLACED.ON REGULAR AGENDA. Mayor Pro Tem Richards suggested
.that all consent agenda items be placed on the regular agenda so that each agenda
item could be explained and acted upon separately for the.benefit of the newly
elected Council Member Smith.. It was unanimously agreed to follow the recommended
procedure.
MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of No 17, 1986 were approved as submitted by
motion of Member Turner, seconded by.Member Smith.
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
MEMBER RICHARDS APPOINTED MAYOR PRO TEM. Manager Rosland stated that it was the
recommendation of Mayor Courtney that Member Richards be appointed Mayor Pro Tem.
Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith to appoint Member. Frederick
S. Richards as Mayor Pro Tem for the year 1987.
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR D.C.I. ADDITION. Planner Craig Larsen recalled that
preliminary plat approval was granted by .the Council at its November 18, 1985
meeting for a two' lot subdivision generally located north of Interlachen Boule-
vard and east of Blake Road. Preliminary plat approval was granted subject to:
1) subdivision dedication, 2) curb cut permit by Hennepin County and 3) a signed
developer's agreement. He advised that.those conditions have been met with the
exception of a subdivision dedication. Mr. Larsen explained that the delay has
been.because of the difficulty in getting the necessary public water easement to
service the property from the watermain on Waterman Avenue. That has now been
accomplished andlthe proponents have requested final plat approval. Staff would
recommend approval based on a subdivision value for the additional lot of
$35,000.00. Mr. Larsen explained that a subdivision dedication is required for
new developments because the increased density puts an additional burden on the
City's systems, especially the park system, and the subdivision dedication of
either land or cash is the mechanism to insure that everyone pays their fair
share of the acquisition of park properties and the development of those. He
further explained that a cash dedication has typically been a percentage of
the land value. No objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to a subdivision dedica-
tion,of $2,800.00:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
D.C.I. ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "D.C.I. ADDITION ", platted by Developers Construction,
Inc., a Minnesota, corporation, and Suburban National Bank, a United States
Corporation, and,presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
January 5, 1987,,be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLATAPPROVAL FOR WHITE OAKS 8TH ADDITION CONTINUED TO 1/26/87.
Mayor Pro Tem Richards stated that it has been requested that the matter of
preliminary plat approval for White Oaks 8th Addition be continued to the
meeting of January 26. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith
to continue the hearing on preliminary plat approval for White Oaks 8th
Addition to January 26, 1987.
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. As recommended by staff,
motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith setting January 26, 1987
as hearing date for the following planning matters:
1) Rezoning - R -ll Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit
District - R.IHawthorne - Lot 4, Block 1, Peacedale Acres, Hoppe Replat
2) Preliminary Plat Approval - Shadow Hill - Generally located north of Crosstown
1/5/87
Highway and east and north of Vernon Court - Robert Hansen
3) Conditional Use Permit - Colonial Church - Generally located west of Tracy
Avenue and south of Olinger Boulevard
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
STREET /UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION GRANTED FOR LOT 39, BLOCK 1, SOUTH HARRIET
PARK ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and
ordered placed on file. Engineer Hoffman explained that a petition has been
received for vacation of the street /utility easement on the East 25 feet of
Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition which is shown as a dedi-
cated right of way. He recalled that in August 1986, Grace Church had made a
similar request for their property abutting the subject easement and the
Council had granted the vacation,.subject to reservation of a utility easement
in favor of Northern States Power Company to maintain their power line on the
property. Staff would recommend granting the vacation as there is no public
use of the property. Mr. Hoffman explained that prior to the hearing notices
are sent to abutting property owners and to the utility companies. The utility
companies are asked if they have any interest in reserving an easement for their
facilities. He,explained that in this case there is a power line on the property
running in a north - .south direction to serve the homes in this area from the rear
of the properties and that the cable company lines are also located on the power
poles. Northern States Power and Rogers.Cablesystems therefore have asked that
an easement be retained to service their lines. There being no public comment
or objections, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:.
RESOLUTION VACATING STREET /UTILITY EASEMENT ON
LOT 39, BLOCK 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK ADDITION
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted December 1, 1986, fixed
a date for a public hearing on a.proposed vacation of the street /utility ease-
ment on Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Addition; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and
the hearing.was held on the 5th day of January, 1987, at which time all persons
desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that.said street right of way and utility easement be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality
owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer
lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed
vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street /utility
easement or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or
otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of the street
and utility easement be and is hereby vacated effective as of January 6, 1987:
East 25 feet of Lot 39, Block 1, South Harriet Park Second Addition.
The City of Edina reserves in favor of Northern States Power Company and Rogers
Cablesystems a 10 foot utility easement within said described street /utility
easement for the maintenance, replacement.repair and removal of,.and for other-
wise attending to wires and poles required for electric.and cable -lines now in,
on or under the above vacated area.
The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceed-
ings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and
filed with the Register of Deeds in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1/2 TON PICK -UP TRUCK. Manager Rosland presented tabulation
of quotes for one 1/2 ton Pick -up Truck for the Public Works Department showing
Suburban Chevrolet at $10,075.92, Polar Chevrolet at $10,092.00 and Todd Chevrolet
at $10,700.00. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith for award
of quote to recommended low quote, Suburban Chevrolet, at $10,075.92.
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Motion carried.
H.R.A. COMMISSIONERS APPOINTED. Mayor Pro Tem Richards advised that the terms of
the commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority run concurrent
with the terms of Council Members as a result of the election process. The
Mayor is required to certify the appointments to the State of Minnesota. Oa*.hs
of office were administered by the City Clerk to Frederick S. Richards and
Ny
1/5/87
Glenn L. Smith as Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
for terms of office to January 1, 1991.
FEASIBILITY REPORT GIVEN; HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
Engineer Hoffman presented a feasibility report on proposed improvements as
follows:
Improvement and Location Estimated Cost
P -L -29 Street Lighting
York Av from Parklawn to Edinborough Way $91,780.00
P -L -30 Street Lighting
W. 76th St from Edinborough Way to Xerxes Av 43,664.00
P -L -31 Street Lighting
Edinborough Way from W. 76th St to York Av 84,401.00
P -BA -272 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete Curb /Gutter
Dearborn Ct in Dearborn and Blakewood Additions 22,411.79
P -BA -273 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete Curb /Gutter
Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Addition 11,422.51
P 7BA -275 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete Curb /Gutter
Green Farm Rd & Apple Ln in Parkwood Knolls 22nd Addn 45,219.03
P -BA -276 Permanent Street Surfacing & Concrete Curb /Gutter
All streets in Interlachen Heights Addition 80,455.83
Mr.. Hoffman stated that the improvements have been investigated and it has been
determined that they are feasible and their construction would be in the best
interest of the overall development of the City of Edina. Staff would recommend
public hearings on January 26, 1987. Member Smith introduced the following
resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENT NOS. P -L -29, P -L -30 AND P -L -31
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CONCRETE CURB AND.GUTTER IMPROVEMENT
NOS. P -BA -272, P -BA -273, P -BA -275 AND P -BA -276
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as
to -the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice
of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements,
said - report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, January 26, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. in the
Edina City Hall to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested
in said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time,
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be
not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to
all affected properties in substantially the following form:
.(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -272 (Dearborn Court)
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -273 (Antrim Terrace)
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -275 (Green Farm Road & Apple Lane)
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -276 (All Streets in Interlachen Heights)
ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -29 (York Ave. from Parklawn to Edinborough Way)
- IMPROVEMENT NO. P. -L -30 (76th St. from Edinborough Way to Xerxes Ave.)
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -31 ( Edinborough Way from W. 76th St. to York Ave.)
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, January 26,
1987, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be con-
structed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The
approximate.cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth
below:
LOCATION
A. Dearborn Court in Dearborn Add'n. & Blakewood Add'n.
Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb & Gutter
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -272
B. Antrim Terrace in Edina Oaks Add'n.
.Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb & Gutter
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -273
C. Green Farms Road & Apple Lane in Parkwood Knolls 22nd Add'n.
Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb & Gutter
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -275
D. Green Farms Road, Green Farms Court, Interlachen Court,
Interlachen Road in Interlachen.Heights Add'n..&
Interlachen Road from Ridge Rd. to Easterly 125' ±
Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb:& Gutter
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -276 -
ESTIMATED COST
$22,411.79
11,422.51
45,219.03
80,455.83
1/5/87
LOCATION
E. York Avenue - Parklawn Ave. to W. 78th Street
Ornamental Street Lighting
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -29
F. West 76th Street - Xerxes Avenue to Edinborough
Ornamental Street Lighting
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -30
G. Edinborough Way -W. 76th Street to York Ave.
Ornamental Street Lighting
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -L -31
The area proposed to be assessed for a portion or
the proposed improvements includes:
Under IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -272:
Lots 1 thru 4, Block 1, Blakewoods Add'n.
Lots 3 thru 8, Block 1, Dearborn Add'n.
Under IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -273:
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1, Edina Oaks Add'n.
Under IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -275:
Lots l.thru 3, Block l; Lots 1 thru 5, Block
Parkwood Knolls 22nd Add'n.
Under IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -276:
Lots 1 thru 5, Block 1; Lots 1 thru 5, Block
Interlachen Heights Add'n.
Lot 4, Block 1, C. R. Strotz First Add'n.
Lot 4, Block 1, Schwantes Add'n.
Under IMPROVEMENT No. P -L -29:
ESTIMATED COST
$91,780.00
Way 43,664.00
84,401.00
all of the proposed costs of
2; Lots 1 thru 8, Block 3;
2; Lots 1 thru 11, Block 3;
Lot 1, Block 1, Al Johnson Add'n; Lot 1, Block 1, Paul Klodt First Add'n;
Lots 1 thru 11, Edinborough Add'n; Lot 1, Block 1, Yorkdale Townhomes of
Edina; Lot 1, Block 1, Ebenezer Society First Add'n.
Under.IMPROVEMENT NO.. P -L -30:
Lots 1 thru 11,
Lot 1, Block 1,
Lot 1, Block 1,
Lot 5, Block 1,
Lot 1, Block 1,
and Lot 1, Bloc
Under IMPROVEMENT NO.
Edinborough Add'n; Lot 1, Block 1, Al Johnson Add'n.
Paul Klodt First Add'n.
Meadow Lane Second Add'n.
Lyndale Builders Add'n;
Yorkdale Townhomes of Edina;
k 1, Ebenezer Society First Add'n.
P -L -31:
Lots 1 thru 11, Edinborough Add'n.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
TAKING OF BIDS AUTHORIZED FOR TENNIS COURTS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. Engineer
Hoffman stated that staff has prepared plans and specifications for the following:
A) Pedestrian bridge for Executive Nine Golf Course (crossing Braemar Blvd.)
B) Tennis courts at Lewis Park.
C) Tennis court renovation at Cornelia Park.
The funds for these park improvements.will be from the Capital Fund for 1987
and carryover from 1986. Staff would recommend that the Council authorize bids
for these projects. Bob.Kojetin, Director of Parks & Recreation, explained
that in the long range planning process for capital improvements money is set
aside for these types of projects. Following discussion as to the process,
Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR TWO.TENNIS COURTS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BE IT.RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:.
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
TWO TENNIS COURTS AND PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
BIDS CLOSE THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 1987
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Reception Conference Room,
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, January 29,
1/5/97
1987 and the Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, February 2,
1987 at the City Hall to consider bids for the following:
Two Tennis Courts and Pedestrian Bridge
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the
items covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer,
City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be
mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the
City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the
time set for receiving them may be returned unopened.
Bids must be in conformance with specifications which are available at the
Edina City Hall. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied
by a bid bond or a certified check payable .to the City of Edina in the amount
of at least ten (10) percent of amount of net bid. The City Council reserves
the right to reject any or all bids or any part of any bid.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
MNDOT AGENCY AGREEMENT APPROVED. Manager Rosland explained that annually the
City enters into an agency agreement with the Minnesota Department of Trans-
portation for federally funded projects. The City appoints the MNDOT Com-
missioner to act as its agent for all federally funded projects. This allows
MNDOT to receive the federal funds and let contracts pursuant to law for con-
struction and improvement of local roads and bridges. Staff would recommend
authorization for execution.of the agency agreement. Member Smith introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AGENCY AGREEMENT
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL AID FORM NO. III
BE IT RESOLVED that pursuant to Section 161.36, Subdivision 1 through 6,
Minnesota Statutes, the Commissioner of'Transportation be appointed as agent
of the City of Edina to let as its agent, contracts for the construction of
local roads and bridges, and the Mayor and the Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a contract with
the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of such
contracts in the form as set forth and contained in "Minnesota Department of
Transportation Agency Agreement" a copy of which said agreement was before the
Council, assuming on behalf of the City all of the obligations therein contained.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
REQUEST FOR ADVERTISING ON BUS SHELTERS NOT APPROVED. Manager Rosland called
the Council's attention to a letter from the Metropolitan Transit Commission
requesting the City's opinion concerning the placing of advertising on public
right of way bus shelters. The advertising revenue would be used to offset
the cost of .maintaining the shelters. Minnesota Statutes 160.27, Subd. 2,
provides that the decision to allow the placement of shelters with advertising
on public right of way rests with the road authority in which the shelter is.
located and may be authorized by permit, license or franchise. Mr. Rosland
said that staff has researched the City's ordinances and does not believe
that advertising on bus shelters.would be appropriate in the City of Edina.
Therefore, the recommendation is that this advertising not be allowed. It
was noted that the Edina Sign Ordinance No. 451 permits bench signs at bus
stops. Member Smith commented that he concurred with staff in that advertis-
ing on bus shelters would be inappropriate. Member Turner said she agreed
but that she found it hard to distinguish between benches and shelters as both
are provided for the customers of.the MTC. The only argument in favor would
be that it might generate additional revenue to .decrease the amount the tax -
payer'pays_for the operation of that service. She said that in replying to
the MTC we should cite the philosophy about signage in the City. Member Smith
added that safety might also be stated as a factor in that advertising would
curtail observation of approaching buses. Mayor Pro Tem Richards suggested
that it may be wise to draft an ordinance which would prohibit advertising
on bus shelters and have it in place. Member Turner added that the sign
ordinance may contain language that would address this issue. Mr. Rosland
responded that staff would review the issue with the City's philosophy in
mind and would being back additional information to the Council. No formal
action was taken.
.. ,.. .r- a 1'.. .,.. ..
1/5/87
TERMS OF MEMBERSHIP ON CITY ADVISORY BOARD AND COMMISSIONS DISCUSSED. Member
Turner said that following the discussion at the Year -End Council Meeting she
had drafted a memorandum regarding the subject of terms of membership on the
City's advisory boards and commissions. She said that from time to time members
of the Council have raised the question of whether or not there should be a limit
to the number of terms an individual can serve on a board or commission but that
the issue has never been decided. Member Turner recommended that there be a limit
to the number of terms an individual can serve.and referred to the proposed limit
as stated in the memorandum for the specific boards /commissions. It was noted
that state statute sets a limit of three 2 -year terms for the Advisory Board of
Health. She stated that this would insure involvement in City government by
more citizens. She recalled that Member Richards had suggested that this issue
be dealt with in the summer rather than now when terms will be up on February 1.
Also that the Council may wish to "grandfather" in all persons now serving.
A discussion followed regarding the merits of "grandfathering ", proposed limits
and whether there really was a perceived problem. It was informally agreed
that the Clerk should prepare a list showing the numbers of terms.current board
and commission members have served.without mentioning names, that this be given
to all the Council Members, that other municipalities should be contacted to see
if they limit number of terms and that this matter be brought back to the Council
in May or June, 1987 for consideration. Member Turner also recommended that the
Council hear formally from each board /commission once a year at a regular Council
meeting for an "annual report ". The boards /commissions at that meeting could
state their goals for the coming year and the Council could respond. She also
recommended that staff orient every new member both to the purpose and responsi-
bilities of the particular board /commission and to the function and procedures
of City government. Following discussion, the concept of meeting annually with
boards /commission was - approved and the.Manager was asked to implement a procedure
to accomplish this. No formal action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES. Motion of Member Smith was
seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale
National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest
Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis,
MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroWest;
Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are
designated as Official Depositories for the.Public Funds of the City of Edina,
County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1988.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member
Turner for adoption of the following resolution:
SIGNATORY RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer
of the City of Edina be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this
municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First Edina National
Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest
Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minnea-
polis and Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from
time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the Contrary, to sign
checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager
and City Treasurer. Each Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and
pay any checks against such account which is signed as above described, whether
or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of,
any officer or officers of the City, including the signer or signers of the check.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
FACSIMILE SIGNATURES RESOLUTION ADOPTED. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by
Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING USE OF
FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS
RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons:
C. WAYNE COURTNEY - MAYOR
KENNETH E. ROSLAND - CITY MANAGER
JOHN WALLIN - CITY TREASURER
on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant = checks, vouchers or other order of public
funds deposited in .First Edina National Bank, First Southdale National Bank,
Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank
1/5/87
of Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest, be and hereby is approved, and that
each of said named persons may authorize said depository banks to honor any
such instrument bearing his facsimile signature in such form as he may designate
and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn,
as fully as though it bore his manually written signature and that instruments
so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository
bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without his
authority.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES RESOLUTION ADOPTED - FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK. Motion
of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following
resolution: °.
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND FIRST EDINA NATIONAL BANK
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves
the assignment by its depository, First Edina National Bank, of the following
securities, as -good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public
Funds deposited in said depository: .
Description Rate Due Par Value
US Treasury Notes 8 Note Q 89
8.000
02/15/89
$1,000,000.00
California St
6.700
02/01/95
140,000.00
Harford Cnty MD
6.200
09/01/87
150,000.00
Oregon St
7.000
01/01/95
200,000.00
$1,490,000.00
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES RESOLUTION ADOPTED - FIRST BANK SOUTHDALE. Motion of
Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITIES
IN LIEU OF BOND - FIRST BANK SOUTHDALE
BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, approves
the assignment by its depository, First Bank Southdale, of the following
securities as good and sufficient collateral for the City of Edina Public Funds
deposited in said depository:
Description Rate Due Par Value
US Treasury Notes 9 3/4 Note U 87 9.750
Baltimore MD 5.900
Beaver Cnty PA New Pub Hsy
Auth Vanport 5.250
Burnsville Minn 5.700
Cowlitz Cnty Wash 5.100
Deer River Minn Indpt Sch Dist
No 317
5.750
Essex Cnty NJ
6.600
Hawaii St
5.900
Osseo Minn -Indpt Sch Dist
No 279
5.750
Yolo Cnty Calif Flood Ctl &
Wtr Consv Dist No 4
4.750
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Richards
Resolution adopted.
04/30/87
10/15/93
06/01/95
02/01/94
07/01/90
02/01/94
06/01/94
02/01/94
01/01/94
$ 200,000.00
.200,000.00
50,000.00
150,000.00
35,000.00
50,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
150,000.00
02/01/87 100,000.00
$1,235,000.00
COUNCIL PACKETS DISCUSSED. Member Smith suggested that the Council packet
materials be limited to 8z x 11 size paper. Manager Rosland explained that
the official Council Minutes Books have traditionally since 1888 been the
legal size and the that agendas have also been on legal size paper to avoid
more than one sheet of paper. After a brief discussion it was informally
agreed to not change the minutes book size and that the agendas would be on
the 8-12 by 11 paper.
AUDIT REPORT ON THE EDINA FOUNDATION PRESENTED. Member Smith called the
Council's attention to the annual audit of The Edina Foundation, noting that
1) the audit was done on a complimentary basis by Boulay, Heutmaker, Zibel
& Company, 2) comments regarding documentation of grants indicated that alot
of grants have been made but that the funds have not been spent, and 3) that
the interest earned from the Endowment Fund is to go back into the general
1/5/87
fund and this was not reflected in the audit. Support and revenue for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 1986 was approximately $85,000 with expenditures
totaling approximately $32,000. The Endowment Fund has been increased sub-
stantially and the interest rate on investments is from 9.625 to 10.25 %.
No formal action was taken.
WORK SESSION ON MISSION STATEMENT DISCUSSED. Member Turner said she was looking
forward to the work session on the City's Mission Statement to be held on
Monday, January 12 and asked what response had been received from the advisory
boards /commission who had been asked to participate. Manager Rosland said we
have heard from about four and that follow -up phone calls would be made to
insure that all boards and commission are represented. Member Turner noted
that Barbara Arney will be the facilitator.
RECEIPT OF PLAQUE FOR RECYCLING EFFORTS FROM COUNTY NOTED. Manager Rosland
advised that the.City of Edina had been presented with a plaque from the
Hennepin County Board of Commissioners in gratitude for its initiative in
implementing a local recycling program and moving towards the County's recycling
goals. Mayor Pro Tem suggested that.a letter of recognition and appreciation
be sent to the Edina Recycling Commission for their efforts in implementing the
pilot recycling project. Manager Rosland said that a letter would be sent.
NOTE OF THANKS FROM CITY ATTORNEY NOTED. Manager Rosland said that a note of
thanks had been received from Tom.Erickson, City Attorney, for the flowers
sent following the death of his mother recently.
COUNCIL RETREAT SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 21 DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland reminded the
Council of the retreat scheduled for March 21 for Strategic Planning and asked
if there was an interest in holding the retreat at a location other than City
Hall. Member Turner stated that she felt it was important to be at a location
away from the usual environment of City Hall and suggested this be discussed
by the Council at the January 12 meeting. It was agreed that Member Turner and
Mr. Hughes would bring a recommendation as to location to the meeting.
REQUEST FROM MINNESOTA NBA BASKETBALL REGARDING TEAM NAME DISCUSSED_. Mayor Pro
Tem Richards stated that the Council has been asked to choose from two team
name alternatives for the expected NBA franchise to be awarded to Minnesota.
The request came from the Minnesota NBA Basketball and city councils throughout
Minnesota as representatives of all parts of the state are being asked to vote.
An informal poll of the Council favored the name "Minnesota Polars" which will
be submitted in response to the request.
LIQUOR FUND BALANCE SHEET OF NOVEMBER 30, 1986 REVIEWED. The Liquor Fund
Balance Sheet of November 30, 1986 was presented, reviewed and ordered placed
on file by motion of Member Turner, seconded by Member Smith and carried
unanimously.
There being no further business on the Agenda the meeting was adjourned by
Mayor Pro Tem Richards at 8:30 p.m.
City Clerk
i
III. A.
V651NA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CASCADE LANE BERMING AND LIFT STATION
The Edina City Council will on Monday, February 2, 1987 at 7:00 P.M., at
the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Hearing on the
necessity and feasibility of constructing a berming project and Lift Station
near the street listed above. Your receipt of this notice is an indication
that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties
which are considered to be benefited.
The estimated cost of this improvement is approximately $11,000.00. It is
proposed that this improvement be assessed on a per lot basis. The project
is proposed to be funded by special assessment and cooperative funding from
the Watershed and City. The proposed project cost split would be 1/3 Assess-
ed, 1/3 City and 1/3 Watershed District. This results in an estimated per
lot assessment of $1,222.22 spread over a ten year period.
This project is being proposed as a result of a petition by property
owners to reduce flooding, and meetings with Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District. The project would be a berm across the properties and a storm
sewer lift station behind the berm.
Construction of this improvement, if approved, will' be accomplished in
1987. Assessments would be levied in 1987 with the initial installment
due in 1988. The improvement is proposed to be assessed over a ten year
period. The present condition of the Municipal Bond Market makes it
difficult to determine the annual rate of interest that will be charged,
on the unpaid balance, but it will not exceed the maximum allowed by law..
The area proposed to be assessed includes Lots 3, 4, & 5, Cascade Falls.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this
improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the Hearing or presented at the hearing itself.
If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between
8:00 A.M. and 4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday.
Thank you.
Francis J. ffma P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
01 -23 -87
FJH: jgr
REVISED
EST ATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MQZESOTA
M .4 011
014 HY ZT111i D 4 10 Q1 'i D
LOCATION: Minnehaha Creek behind 4609& 4613, & 4617 Cascade Lane
BEARING DATE: February 2, 1987
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $11,060.00
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
NO. OF ASSESSABLE TATS: 3
ESTIMATED COST PER ASSESSABLE LOT: $1,228.89
( 2/3 of cost proposed to be shared y ity & Waters-Hed District
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
LOT
3
4
5
ADDITION,
January 29, 1987
IQi►M)2hW_M
Cascade Falls 28- 117 -21 -24 -0026
it it 28- 117 -21 -24 -0027
it it 28- 117 -21 -24 -0028
UNIT
QUALITY MATF.RTAT. PRICE TOTAL
1 Lift Station Complete (Manhole, Frame &
Cover, Electrical Hook Up, Pump &.Discharge
Hose (2" P.V.C.) $3200.00 $3200.00
1000 S/Y Sod on 4" Compacted Black Dirt $2.50 $2500.00
200 C/Y Clay Borrow $7.00 $1400.00
5 Transplant Shrubs $75.00 $375.00
40 Tons, Type II Rip -Rap - Delivered $10.00 $400.00
1 Rip -Rap Installed with Filter Blanket $2000.00 $2000.00
SUB - TOTAL:
ADD 10% ENGIIQMUNG & 2% CLERICAL: $1185.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $
PREPARED BY O
CBECKED BY
rancis J. Ho .F.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: W. 50th Street - Edina Court to Halifax Avenue
DATE: January 29, 1987
The remaining portion of West 50th Street between Edina Court and Halifax
Avenue has been carefully reviewed for construction. As you will recall,
City Council gave concept approval to Alternate A for this portion of
roadway. Alternate A was to reconstruct the roadway in the same config-
uration.
The other issues that need resolution are as follows:
A. Appropriate time to do the construction.
B. The removal of the overhead NSP wires and their underground
relocation.
C. The appropriate time to reforest the boulevards due to losses
from Dutch Elm disease.
As a background to this issue, the France Avenue reconstruction from
Excelsior Boulevard to West 492 Street should be reviewed. As of last
week, the City of Minneapolis has informed us that a contract for con-
struction will probably not occur prior to late June or early July.
The first portion of the project will be from Excelsior Boulevard to
West 44th Street. This portion, if started mid - summer, could result in
the France Avenue project extending into the 1988 construction season.
This information leads us to conclude that if construction is to occur
on West 50th Street, it should-be early 1987 or be delayed to 1989.
Thus, as to issue A listed above, our recommendation is to review the
position of the 50th & France Business and Professional Association
prior to a Council decision on the appropriate construction timeframe.
Issue B is the removal of the overhead NSP power lines and their relocation.
After careful review with NSP, the recommendation would be to bury the wires
on the north boulevard behind the sidewalk. This would result in the most
cost effective method of removing the overhead wires. One disadvantage
of using underground wires on West 50th Street is the need for transformer
locations on the lot lines adjacent to West 50th Street so that overhead
power can resume to the neighborhoods on either side of the street.
IV. A.
Memo
W. 50th St.
Jan. 29, 1987
Page 2
Issue C is the reforestation of the boulevards due to tree loss from
Dutch Elm disease. Since the street width is not going to.change, the
powerline issue and reforestation could occur at a time different from
road construction. Our staff believes we should relocate the north sidewalk
a couple of feet north to allow for a better boulevard area (the City right -
of -way line is actually ten feet north of the sidewalk). This sidewalk
relocation would result in an opportunity to place the new trees a.bit
farther from the curb line. Additionally, we believe some consideration
should be given to removing some of those trees which appear to be damaged
or hang too low over the streets. We make this comment with a recognition
that some very large trees stand right behind the sidewalk.
We would wish to discuss these primary issues on the Monday, February 2,
1987 Council meeting.
50th &
FRANCE
r _
BUSINESS It PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424
Jariu iry 22, 1987
c. Wayr:e Courtney, Nlayor
4313 Eton Place
Edina, Mn. 55424
Dear, Mr'. Courtnc. -y;
The 50th & France Business and Prof;:ssiorjaj Associ.at.ion's purpose is to
be a unifying force that reflects tho nee -as of its members. We are
merchants, bankers, lawyers and doct•:;7•S. What we share: is our bei i r
in the 50th & France community. We wan C. �tiiha t ' s best; for a,!.
The closing of 50th St. during the suinrier- oL 1986 had serious and costly
effects on most of the businesses at �Oth & France. The:, definite c ! os i riq
of France ave. from 49 St. north t.o I-;xc olsioc Blvd. duriri,t the;
of 1987 will again cause many of :)ur hus inesses morF.- f inane i,,i 1. losses.
Thecefor•e, when the closing of 50th St. from L:ooddale co lsr. Binh Edina
was brought to our attention by the Ci Ly of i-Aina; a general mr etinq was
held on Jan.7th and attended by 80 concer-neci im.,mbers. A r-(-f)re c•ri1.aLi.ve
from the City of Edina explained all Nie pror?osed. options. Trw-ru was lots
of discussion from everyone.
A survey was taken and t.-il l led. The over-whe LM i ng 83-A major-It. vor-od to .
postpone the 50th St. cons tru(- Lion for aL ie ist, 2 years. T.,)
construction on 50th St. during the same 'ear as France Avl-. c oui-1 L,.
devastating:
Our business survival could depend on ,.our- voting "no" Lo -ie pcofjo-:cad
closing of' 50L -h SL. dur-ing the summer of 1987.
We want: to cooperate with Lhe, City of Edina as much as pos:; iii I : • jr)d
maintain d mutual open and honest. re I a L i. onsh i p .
Speaking as an P.dina homeowner; an Edina bu:�in(.;ss owner at. !)OLh i:K France;
and more importantly, on behalf o: the members of the 50th & France
Business & Professional Association, we strongly oppose the pro;c,ct.
at this time.
We thank you for your cooperation and support In this matter.
Since
e
II
An et.sor., 1 9 =,7 President
50th & France riu�z i riess £. Assoc.
V. A. 1.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: White Oaks 8th Addition S -86 -9
DATE: January 30, 1987
Attached are the findings and reasons to support a denial
of the referenced Subdivision. Copies of these findings have
been sent to Mr. Monroe, his attorney and representative of
the White Oaks neighborhood. Mr. Monroe has indicated that
he may be unable to attend the February 2, 1987, meeting,
and may, as a consequence, ask that the hearing be continued
to a future meeting. I will not knew for sure until Monday.
CITY OF EDINA
In the Matter of the Application of FINDINGS,
Ken Monroe for a Subdivision of Lots DECISION,
16 and 17, Auditor's Subdivision No. AND
319, and Lot 9, White Oaks 2nd Addition REASONS
(S -86 -9)
The above entitled matter was heard before the City
Council, City of Edina, on December 15, 1986, and February 2,
1987. Mr. Ken Monroe ( "Proponent ") was present. The City
Council, having heard and reviewed all of the facts and arguments
presented by the Proponent, his representative, property owners
in the vicinity of the subject subdivision and their
representatives, and having heard and reviewed the evidence and
law adduced by the Proponent, his representative, City staff, and
property owners and their representatives and being fully
advised, after due consideration, hereby makes the following
r �
FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. The Proponent, on November 20, 1986, submitted an
application for subdivision of a 35,580 square foot parcel of
land located west of Townes Road and south of Sunnyside Road.
This tract of land (the "Subject Property ") contains two platted
parcels, described as Lot 16 and Lot 17, Auditor's Subdivision
No. 319. An existing single dwelling unit building is located on
the southerly portion of the Subject Property. According to City
records, the Subject Property and two adjacent parcels, Lot 9,
White Oaks 2nd Addition and Lot 1, White Oaks 3rd Addition, are
owned by the Proponent.
2. The subdivision (the "Proposed Subdivision "), as
submitted with the application for subdivision on November 20,
1986, delineated two, R -1 single dwelling unit lots. Lot 1 of
the proposed subdivision measured 16,800 square feet in area and
Lot 2 measured 19,100 square feet. A portion of the area within
Lot 2 is located within a marshy area. The existing dwelling
located on the proposed Lot 1 would remain. The proposed Lot 2
is of unusual shape with a narrow frontage and a portion (said
Lot 16) being a 50 foot square seemingly stuck onto the north
line of the lot. Also, the proposed Lot 2 is only 60 feet wide
50 feet back from the front property line. Therefore, a 15 foot
lot width variance is requested. Also, the existing dwelling on
the proposed Lot 1 and a new dwelling on the proposed Lot 2
would share a common driveway due to the marshy area on Lot 2.
The encroachment of the marsh area on Lot 2 restricts the
buildable area to the rear portion of the property which,
together with the shared common driveway, results in the visual
appearance and practical use as a "neck lot" contrary to the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan (as stated in paragraph 9 of
these findings) and would impair the symmetry of the White Oaks
neighborhood.
3. Lot 2 of the Proposed Subdivision exhibits steep
slopes exceeding thirty percent. Development of Lot 2 would
result in substantial cuts in the existing slopes.
4. The Edina Community Development and Planning
Commission (the "Commission ") reviewed the Proposed Subdivision
at its December 3, 1986, meeting. Several property owners
residing in the vicinity of the Subject Property were present and
spoke in opposition to the Proposed Subdivision citing issues
concerning the visual alteration of the terrain, the storm water
storage capacity of the marsh, damage to the character of the
White Oaks neighborhood, and the establishment of a precedent for
further subdivision in the neighborhood. After consideration of
recommendations by City Staff, comments of the Proponent, and
property owners in the vicinity, the Commission recommended
approval of the Proposed Subdivision with one change: that Lot 9
White Oaks 2nd Addition be included in Lot 2 of the Proposed
Subdivision to eliminate the requested lot width variance.
Said Lot 9 is an existing platted lot conforming to the lot size
requirements of the Edina Ordinance No. 825 (the "Zoning
Ordinance ").
5. Following the meeting of the Commission and prior
to the scheduled hearing before the City Council, the Proponent
submitted a modified proposal for the Proposed Subdivision. This
modified proposal ( "Modified Proposed Subdivision ") includes Lot
9 White Oaks 2nd Addition, as recommended by the Commission. The
effect of the addition of the additional property was to increase
the size of Lot 2 of the Proposed Subdivision to 23,000 square
feet and to make Lot 2 conform to the lot width requirement of
the Zoning Ordinance. However, the useable area on Lot 2 was not
increased by the additional area because the additional area is
all marshy area. Thus, the unusual shape and "neck lot" aspects
of this modified Lot 2 continue to exist, and the shared driveway
with Lot 1 continues to be necessary. Also the need to make
substantial cuts in the steep slopes of the proposed Lot 2, in
order to develop the lot, continues to exist.
6. On December 15, 1987, the Edina City Council
conducted a public hearing and received the report and
recommendation of the Commission regarding the Proposed
Subdivision. The Council also considered the Modified Proposed
Subdivision. Pursuant to applicable City Ordinances, notice of
the December 15, meeting was published in the Edina Sun Current
and mailed to property owners within 350 feet of the Subject
Property. At said meeting the Proponent indicated his
willingness to modify the Proposed Subdivision to conform to
recommendations of the Commission. Also at said hearing,
surrounding property owners and their representatives testified
in opposition to the Proposed Subdivision and Modified Proposed
Subdivision. A petition opposing the Proposed Subdivision and
Modified Proposed Subdivision signed by approximately 98
individuals who reside in the White Oaks neighborhood was
submitted. Among the issues submitted in their oral and written
testimony including a letter to the Council from the White Oaks
Improvement Association dated December 12, 1986, were:
A. The character and symmetry of the
neighborhood would be adversely affected;
B. The subdivision is contrary to the intent of
the original developer to limit further
subdivision within the neighborhood as
evidenced by the existing platting which
preserves topography and wooded areas, and
the specific dedication land for parks, open
space and ponding purposes;
C. The aesthetic value of the marsh area,
neighboring lots, and the neighborhood
in general would be adversely impacted
by the Proposed Subdivision;
D. An undesireable precedent would be
established which would lead to other
subdivisions in the neighborhood;
E. The marsh area is a valuable water
and natural habitat resource and should be
protected by a 100 foot easement around its
perimeter similar to larger, less
transitory pond areas.
F. The shared driveway of the Proposed
Subdivision is contrary to the character
of the neighborhood.
7. The Zoning Ordinance imposes the following minimum
standards for single dwelling unit lots:
Minimum Lot Area 9,000 square feet
Minimum Lot Width 75 feet
Minimum Lot Depth 120 feet
A. The dimensions and areas of Lots 1 and 2 of
the Modified Proposed Subdivision comply with the above
standards.
follows:
B. The Zoning Ordinance defines " lot area" as
"the area within the lot lines exclusive of land
located below the ordinary highwater elevation of lakes, ponds
and streams."
8. Edina Ordinance No. 801 (the "Platting Ordinance ")
states that the City in approving plats, shall consider, among
other things, the suitability of plats from the standpoint of
community planning.
9. The Edina Comprehensive Plan, adopted by the City
Council in December 12, 1981, states the following general
policies:
Allow further subdivision of developed single
family lots only if neighborhood character and
symmetry are preserved.
- Prohibit "neck lot" subdivisions whereby access to
public streets is gained through narrow strips of
land adjacent to other lots.
Require increased minimum lot sizes for single
family and two family lots on steep slopes.
THEREFORE, based on the foregoing findings, the City
Council does hereby make the following
ncn;cinn -
The application for the Proposed Subdivision and the
Modified Proposed Subdivision entitled White Oaks 8th Addition is
hereby denied.
The above decision is made for the following
Reasons:
A. The policies of the Comprehensive Plan must be
considered in deciding whether or not to approve subdivisions.
The Proposed Subdivision and Modified Proposed Subdivision are
contrary to the policies of the Comprehensive Plan concerning the
further subdivision of developed single family lots because the
White Oaks neighborhood character and symmetry are not preserved,
because a "neck lot" effectively results from the subdivision and
because a substantial portion of steep slopes on Lot 2 would be
altered by development.
B. Property owners in the vicinity of the Subject
Property have the right to rely upon the filed plats for the area
and may rightly presume that any modification or replatting of
said plats will be in a manner suitable and compatible with
surrounding properties and that the character of the White Oaks
neighborhood will be preserved.
C. Although the lots in the Proposed Subdivision and
Modified Proposed Subdivision are similar in size to some lots in
the vicinity, other factors, including the unusual shape of Lot
2, the presence of steep slopes, the encroachment of the marsh
into the buildable area of the lot, and the location of the
proposed, shared driveway prevent the development of Lot 2
without adversely impacting the character and symmetry of the
White Oaks neighborhood.
D Approval of the Proposed Subdivision and Modified
Proposed Subdivision could establish a precedent encouraging the
replatting of lots with similar circumstances which would
adversely alter the character and symmetry of the White Oaks
neighborhood contrary to the policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
E. Denial of the Proposed Subdivision and Modified
Proposed Subdivision is not harmful to the Proponent because Lot
17, Auditor's Subdivision No. 319 can continue to be used for a
single family dwelling as it is now platted and used, and Lot 9,
White Oaks 2nd Addition meets the requirements for a single
family dwelling lot as it is presently platted. The Proposed
Subdivision and the Modified Proposed Subdivision is an attempt
to manipulate lot lines for the sole benefit of the Proponent
contrary to the Edina Comprehensive Plan and without regard for
the White Oaks neighborhood character and symmetry.
CIIIENT
LOCOATION MAP AGENDA
LOT • .Yi a.. C
am
NUMBER
LOCATION
LD -87 -1
6508 -6510 Gleason Court
EDINA PLANNING ®EPARTI "ENT
�C ~CAULEY TRAIL ..NEST
1
CROSSVIE
UTHERA;.
`t
+. CREEK VALLEY.
•PARK
:.•
000
t0000
MM
ELEM. SCHOOL
"00
TiM•E
WIN
��I
i�lll��j�
i ►�
,
� ��
�
III ■t ■����
LOT • .Yi a.. C
am
NUMBER
LOCATION
LD -87 -1
6508 -6510 Gleason Court
EDINA PLANNING ®EPARTI "ENT
�C ~CAULEY TRAIL ..NEST
1
CROSSVIE
UTHERA;.
`t
+. CREEK VALLEY.
•PARK
:.•
CREEK VALLEY
�_.
ELEM. SCHOOL
TiM•E
LOT • .Yi a.. C
am
NUMBER
LOCATION
LD -87 -1
6508 -6510 Gleason Court
EDINA PLANNING ®EPARTI "ENT
LD -87 -1
Refer to:
6508 -6510 Gleason Court
Lot 12, Block 1, Gleason Court
Attached Survey
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent is
requesting a party wall lot division of an existing double
bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Sked moved to recommend approval. Mrs. Paulus seconded
the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING.COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 28, 1987
LD -87 -1 6508 -6510 Gleason Court
Lot 12, Block 1, Gleason Court
Refer to: Attached Survey
The proponent is requesting a party wall lot division of an
existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are
provided.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Hedlund
Lead surveyors
Engineering
Civil Enolneers
Services
Land Planners
NPROrs�j�te
Y FOR: Ron Clark Construt .,tion Cu,
"SAIKO AS' PARCEL A:
That Part of Lot 12
the record 1 `' Y Block 1
9201 East IMGMIngron Freeway
6b"ingt"' MknMOto 55-420
Phone: "S-0289
BOOK 8 7 PAGE 88
JOB NO. 86- 466
P dt thereof,
lying westerly of a line
City of
Edina CLEASON
He
� Henuepin
COURT, according to
Lot 12 distant 64.87 feet
drawn Fr,
County,
north lineMlofeSsai
measured elan east
g;said nurth line,
12 distant
of -thwPthe
d
said
corner thereof, as
69.77 feet
reserving easements
east of
point on the suut.h line of said Lot
the southwest
of record,
corner
thereof, and
PARCF. L B.
That part of Lot 12, Block 1
the record plat thereof, City of Edina,, Hennepin GLEASON COU11T, according to
lying easterly of a line drawn from a pOin,, he nCrthtlineMinnnesota,
Lot 12 distant 64.87 feet east of the northwest f said
measured along said north line, corner thereof, as
12 distant 69.77 to ('� +int 4,n the south line of said Lot
feet mast Of the suut.hwest out" l thereof, reserving ''``sr�uents of re( -ur�J.
and
GLER -50N
91�s iL.
CERTIFICATE OF LOCATION OF BUILDING
hereby certify that on 1214 1$(�
1 'node a survey of the location of the
building on the above described properly
and the# the location of sold building Is
rAwncdy sbowo oa the above pl eL
COURT a�p
G• 4' 93 ' 16?4.199
- -��
12904 t ;. —
f
.RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lot 12, Block 1, GLEASON COURT
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 12, Block 1, Gleason Court, according to the
record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line
of said Lot 12 distant 64.87 feet east of the northwest corner
thereof, as measured along said north line, to a point on the
south line of said Lot 12 distant 69.77 feet east of the south-
west corner thereof, and reserving easements of record.
and
That part of Lot 12, Block 1, Gleason Court, according to the
record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of
said Lot 12 distant 64.87 feet east of the northwest corner thereof,
as measured along said north line, to a point on the south line of
said Lot 12 distant 69.77 feet east of the southwest corner thereof,
and reserving easements of record.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hard-
ship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with
the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the
City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
Nos. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made
in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of February, 1987.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
-TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer and Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: January 28, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Well #2 - Pump Overhaul - Funded by Capital Plan
(Wooddale Plant)
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. E. H. Renner & Sons Inc. $11,370.00
2. Layne Minnesota Co. $12,536.00
3. Keys Well Drilling Co. $12,625.00
veparumenc Kecommendation:
E. H. Renner & Sons Inc.
Si
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid ( is not
$11,370.00
V1I. A.
a
Works - Utilities
Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
c j�,/ ( A )a 0,4
John Wallin, Finance Director
City Ma ager's Endorsement:
1.
I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend
the purchase, p nd Council approve
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Roseland, Cit
e
VII.B
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Consent
Agenda
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 29 January 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Pedestrian Bridge over Braemar Blvd. for Golf Course.--Funded from Capital Plan Budget
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. David Volkmann Construction $34,500.00
2. Sheehy Construction $36,500.00
3. Cy -Con Inc. $39,965.00
4. C. S. McCrossan $44,750.00
5. Lametti & Sons $54,590.00
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Department Recommendation: David Volkmann Construction $ 34,500.00
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bi is is not
Signat
Department
within the amount ,budget for the purchase.
� John Wallin, Finance Director
City Zanager's Endorsement: 1. concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend
Council approve the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, Ci y Manager
VII.0
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Consent
Agenda
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: 29 January 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Tennis Courts - Lewis & Cornelia Parks. Funded by-Capital Plan Fund (1986)
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Bury & Carlson $60,428.00
2. H. L. Johnson $68,654.00
3. Barber Construction
4. Valley Paving
5. Bitumonous Roadways
6. Daily & Sons
7.
8.
9.
10.
$69,222.00
$76,737.00
$93,000.00
$93,463.00
Department Recommendation: Bury & Carlson / $ 60,428.00
Finance Director's Endorsement: Signature Department
The recommended bid is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
J I 1
John Wallin, Finance Director
City anager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and ecmme d
Council approve the purchase. J A��/�
2. I recommend as an alternative: / / l/J o // /�
KennethbRosland, City Manager
TO:
M E M O R A N D U M
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian A � 4
DATE: January 29, 1987
SUBJECT: Metropolitan Airport Proposed
Noise Budget Hearing
VIII. A.
On January 28, 1987, I attended the Metropolitan Airport
Commission public hearing for the proposed noise budget.
Key factors of the proposed noise budget are:
*Establishment of a maximum noise level ceiling
per day of operation (budget)
*Allocation of a portion of the noise budget to
each airline using Minneapolis -St. Paul International
Airport (MSP)
di
*Flexibility for the airlines to substitute quieter
stage III aircraft for noisier aircraft thereby
providing an incentive for the airline to fly more
stage III aircraft
*Enforcement provisions to penalize the airlines
who violate the noise budget ordinance
The noise budget was developed to reduce the noise level at
the airport to the 1984 level which has been deemed acceptable.
If indeed the 1984 level was acceptable, it's difficult to
predict whether the noise budget, as proposed, would achieve this
goal.
Reactions heard at the Metropolitan Airport Commission
public hearing were varied. The airlines, Chambers of Commerce,
and hotel operators predicted a severe economic hardship for the
region if the noise budget were adopted. Residents of the
portion of the community adversely affected by airport noise
generally agreed that the noise budget would be a step in the
right direction toward providing some relief from noise
pollution.
The Federal Aviation Administration objected to the noise
budget because it would interfere with interstate commerce, the
ordinance proposal uses a noise measurement technique which is
inappropriate and that this ordinance may create a hardship on
other airports because quieter airplanes may be diverted to
Minneapolis -St. Paul.
There was strong support for developing an economic impact
statement before seriously considering the proposed noise budget
ordinance. I suspect the Metropolitan Airports Commission will
undertake an economic impact statement before enacting the noise
budget.
The airport is now one of the major hubs for air travel in
the nation. The airlines use the airport to collect passengers
from other communities and fly them on to their destination. The
hub system has increased the air traffic considerably following
airline deregulation.
The noise budget, assuming no change in aircraft mix at the
airport, will result in a reduction-of 56 landing and take off
cycles per day from the 1986 average. This reduction equates to
a perceived noise level reduction of one decibel per day. It's
difficult to weigh the benefit of one decibel noise reduction
because of the complex formula used to calculate the perceived
noise level.
The airport would like to extend runway 4/22 which will
allow wider distribution of air traffic and fan the impact of
noise from the airport over a larger area. This, in itself will
reduce the number of flights over some segments of the community,
but it will also create a noise problem in areas of Bloomington
and St. Paul which presently is not greatly impacted. There may
be trade offs during deliberation to accomplish this.
The solution to the noise problem at the airport will be
very painful and difficult to resolve. Quieter aircraft will be
coming in the future, but it will take years for changeover to
take place. Meanwhile residents will be subjected to
unacceptable noise levels near the airport. To build another
airport to reduce the activity at Minneapolis -St. Paul will take
an estimated 20 years . The opposition to the noise budget
ordinance is formidable both politically and economically. The
use of Minneapolis -St. Paul as a hubbing airport does increase
airplane traffic, but it also increases the economic feasibility
of the airline industry. Hubbing also enhances the regions
ability to travel virtually anywhere with convenient flight
times.
The Metropolitan Airport Commission will be receiving
comments on the noise budget until February 6, 1987. Written
comments addressing the proposed noise budget may be sent to MAC
General Offices, 6040 -28th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55450.
VIII. B.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
David Velde, City Sanitarian
SUBJECT: Regulation of Herbicide /Pesticide Application
DATE: January 15, 1987
Councilman Richards has asked that we look at the
possibility of controlling the application of herbicides ,
pesticides and lawn fertilizers within the City. A few Cities
are currently regulating the application of fertilizers or
herbicides. The City of St. Paul regulates the application of
herbicides and pesticides by commercial applicators. Bloomington
may start to regulate commercially applied pesticides and
herbicides this year. The City of Shoreview does not regulate
herbicides and pesticides but does regulate the commercial
application of lawn fertilizers. To my knowledge these are the
only communities now involved in this regulation.
The stated intent of limiting and controlling the
application of fertilizers is to maintain and improve water
quality. Regulating herbicides and pesticides is intended to
prevent exposure of humans and animals to possibly toxic
chemicals.
Attached is a copy of the Ordinance being considered by the
City of Bloomington. This ordinance regulates only herbicide and
pesticide applications by commercial operators, such as
Chemlawn. The key elements of this and other similar ordinances
are as follows:
Permits:
Commercial applicators must receive an annual permit from
the City. This permit allows the City to review the
qualifications and training of applicators, the type and dosage
of chemicals used, and proof of licensing by the State Department
of Agriculture.
Iy
Spill Control:
Commercial applicators must file an acceptable spill
control plan with the City. Ordinances also control the disposal
of chemicals.
Lawn Posting:
Warning signs must be posted on all lawns treated with
herbicides or pesticides._ An example of the required signage for
St. Paul is attached.
Existing Control:
In Minnesota, the Department of Agriculture is the agency
responsible for the control of pesticide application. Lawn
chemical application companies are required to be licensed by the
Department of Agriculture and the Department monitors their
activities. Each company has certified pesticide applicators who
have been trained and tested for the pesticides which they use.
However, each individual pesticide applicator may have up to four
workers under his or her supervision who may not be certified but
may apply pesticides.
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture is submitting a bill
in the upcoming legislative session which will require
certification of each individual applicator. This is in response
to reports that inappropriate actions were taken when handling
emergencies in the field by non certified applicators. The
proposed bill will also prohibit communities from adopting local
regulations controlling pesticide applicators. The bill will not
require posting of lawns which have been treated. The belief is
that the signs are not effective in preventing children and
animals from walking on freshly treated lawns and that the
signing requirement is difficult to enforce.
Other Considerations:
The application of pesticides and herbicides is controlled
by Federal legislation. This legislation allows individual
states to regulate the sale or use of pesticides consistent with
provisions of the federal regulations. A recent District Court
decision in the State of Maryland found that political
subdivision of the state were not allowed to regulate the sale or
use of pesticides. The implications of this ruling to us are
unclear at this time.
Licensing and monitoring the application of pesticides and
fertilizers within the City may require significant staff time.
At this time we are not sure how much time would be required.
• I�
Staff Recommendation:
At this time,, staff does not support adoption of a lawn
chemical ordinance for the following reasons:
Enforcement:
It will increase the workload on present staff beyond our
present capabilities. The City of St. Paul did not provide for
additional staffing which has resulted in inadequate enforcement
and monitoring of the lawn chemical applicators. Enforcement
action is initiated on a _complaint only basis.
Expertise:
Present staff does not have the technical expertise to
address the multitude of chemicals which may be used on lawns.
Liability:
As the regulatory authority, the City of Edina may increase
its liability exposure in the event a lawn chemical applicator
fails to perform within the requirements of the Ordinance.
Legal Authority:
In light of the proposed Department of Agriculture bill, the
adoption of an Ordinance to regulate lawn chemical application
may be a mute issue. There is support for the Department of
Agricultures' position in previous supreme court decisions.
PREL R Y
MI
ARTICLE VII. LAWN HERBICIDE AND PESTICIDE CONTROL
SEC. 10.43. Scope.
The sections of this Article shall apply only to commercial lawn herbicide
and pesticide applicators and to bulk herbicide or pesticide storage facilities
within the City of Bloomington.
SEC. 10.44. Definitions.
"Bulk Herbicide ", means any volume of herbicide that is fifty -six (56) United
States gallons or more, or one - hundred (100) pounds or greater net dry weight,
held in an individual container.
"Commercial applicator ", means an applicator, of lawn herbicide and lawn
pesticide, as an occupation, employment or enterprise for compensation, other
than a private applicator or noncommercial applicator.
"Customer ", means a resident of the City of Bloomington who has a recipient
of a commercial application of lawn herbicide or a lawn pesticide application.
"Herbicide ", means any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a
plant regulator, defoliant or desiccant.
"Label ", means the written, printed or graphic words or symbols on, or attached
to, the herbicide, the pesticide, or its containers or wrappers.
"P.esti -cide ";•means any substance or mixture of substances intended for
preventing, destroying, repelling or mitigating any pest.
"Spill", means the discharge of any amount of herbicide into the ground, water
or air, other than the actual herbicide or pesticide application during a lawn
treatment.
"Spill Control Plan ", means a written documentation detailing emergency
notification procedures, spill prevention policy, personal safety protection during a
spill, spill controls, spill clean -up and disposal of spilled herbicides, spilled
pesticides or mixtures of lawn herbicides or lawn pesticides and other substances.
SEC. 10.45. Operating Permit.
(a) Permit Required. No person shall engage in the commerical application
of lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide without an annual permit issued by the City
of Bloomington.
1
(b) Permit Procedure. Permit applications for a lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide
applicator permit valid for a calender year, shall be submitted to the Building and
Inspection Division at least 30 days in advance of the proposed initial lawn herbicide
or lawn pesticide applications each year within the City.
(c) Application Form. Permit application forms shall be provided by the City and
and shall include the following information.
(1) Name, address and telephone number of the commercial applicator.
(2) Names of employees applying herbicides or pesticides to lawns.
(3) Minnesota Department of Agriculture herbicide and pesticide applicator
license . numbers for all persons employed who engage in the commercial application
of lawn herbicides or lawn pesticides.
(d) Permit Fee. The annual permit fee for a commercial lawn herbicide
or lawn pesticide applicator shall be $25.00. The permit fee shall not
be pro- rated.
SEC. 10.46. Training and Safety.
(a) Training Requirements. All employees engaged in lawn herbicide or
lawn pesticide application shall be trained in the proper use, handling,
transportation, distribution, application and disposal of lawn herbicides or
lawn pesticide as delineated on the herbicide or pesticide label.
(b) Written Records. The licensed commercial lawn herbicide or lawn
pesticide applicator shall retain records documenting employee training for
a period of two years. A written record of the mixture and concentration of
herbicide or pesticide currently being transported or applied shall be kept
on the transporting vehicle.
- (c) Material Safety Data Sheets. Any licensed commercial lawn herbicide
or lawn pesticide applicator shall at all times have the appropriate material
safety data sheet for each and every lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide used.
Copies of the data sheets shall be kept at the primary business office and in
each vehicle transporting herbicides or pesticides.
(d) Safety Equipment. Safety equipment required or recommended on the
herbicide or pesticide product label shall be readily accessible and used by
licensed commercial lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide applicators.
(e) Spills Prohibited. It is unlawful to discharge or cause to be discharged any
lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide into any public sewer or natural outlet within
the City.
(f) Spill Plan Required. No commercial lawn herbicide or lawn pesticide applicator
shall operate within the City limits without providing a spill control plan to
the City. The information shall be submitted on a form given to the applicant
by the City.
(g) Disposal. All lawn herbicides or lawn pesticides and their containers shall
be disposed of in accordance with the Minnesota Pesticide Control Law of 1976,
Chapter 18A of Minnesota Statutes, as amended.
(h) Pesticide and Herbicide Drift.
pesticide mixture shall result in damage
area.
SEC. 10.47. Inspections Permitted.
No application of any lawn herbicide or lawn
to any non - target organism or non - target
The City is hereby authorized to conduct field inspections of bulk herbicide
and pesticide storage, on -site lawn herbicide and lawn pesticide application,
lawn herbicide and lawn pesticide application devices, lawn herbicide and lawn
pesticide tanker trucks; lawn herbicide and lawn pesticide equipment; inspections
of all training records and customer notifications.
SEC. 10.48. Customer Notification.
(a) Notification Requirements. Commercial lawn herbicide or lawn
pesticide applicators shall provide any customer within the City limits
receiving a herbicide or pesticide lawn treatment with the information listed
in subparts 1 through 3 below:
1) Date, time and address of property treated;
2) Name, address, telephone number, state license number, and signature
of the applicator;
3) Name of the herbicide or pesticide, dosage used, and the location of
the area treated.
(b) Record Retention. Copies of customer notification shall be retained by the
commercial awn herbicide or lawn pesticide applicator for a period of two years
after _the Aate of treatment.
SEC. 10.49. Application Posting.
All persons who apply lawn herbicides or lawn pesticides
outdoors are required to attach or affix warning markers on the street frontage
of the property so treated. The warning markers must be a minimum of 18 inches
above the top of the grass line or grade line, whichever is higher. The markers
shall also be posted on the lawn or yard no closer than two feet from the sidewalk
or right -of -way and no further than five feet from the sidewalk or right -of -way.
The markers shall be posted for a minimum of 24 hours after the application.
The warning markers must be of a rain resistant material and shall provide the
following information:
(1) The name of the company applying the herbicide or, if not a company, the name
of the person having done the application.
2) The following language. "This lawn chemically treated on (date).
Please stay off lawn for 24 hours ", or a universally accepted symbol which is
recognized as having the same meaning or intent.
3
SEC. 10.50. Severence.
If any provision of this Article or the application of any provision is
held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining
portions of the Article and the application of the Article to any other
person or situation shall not be invalidated.
SEC. 10.51. Penalties.
A violation of a provision of this Article shall be a
misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $700.00 and /or 90 days in jail.
4
1987 ST. PAUL MARKER
F � K
r y, O
ANOTHER CHEMLAWN CUSTOMER SERVICE
CUSTOMER: PLEASE REMOVE DAY FOLLOWING APPLICATION
i:�.
A
December 15, 1986
Mr. Craig Larson
City Planner
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Larson:
It has come to our attention that the City of Edina is proposing
legislation - regulating lawn care companies.
ChemLawn Services Corporation has assisted other communities that have
proposed similar legislation and would like to provide you with
information (see enclosed) we believe you will find helpful as you begin
discussing this complex issue.
We believe, as many communities do, that all applicators should be
licensed and trained in pest control application procedures and spill
control procedures.
We also believe that all facilities that house lawn care companies
should have recycling systems for the containment of washwater and
pest control material.
As a demonstration of our commitment to high quality service, we have
been placing markers following pest control applications on our customers'
lawns in St. Paul, Minnesota since the fall of 1985. We plan on expanding
this marker program to all our customers lawns in the Midwest in 1987.
Should you have questions about our marker program or anything to do
with professional lawn care, please do not hesitate to call me at
(612) 553 -9731.
Sincerely,
Cif `/ L/�,
'J
John Peckham
Regional Technical Manager
ChemLawn Services Corporation
3131 Fernbrook Lane North
Suite 202
Plymouth, MN 55441
lmt
Enclosure
ChemLawn Services Corporation . 3131 Fernbrook Lane North . Suite 202 . Plymouth, Minnesota 55441 . [(612) 553-9731]
�f
VIII.D
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland
r
FROM: Ceil Smith
SUBJECT: Manager Performance Evaluation Process
DATE: January 30, 1987
I have made the suggested wording changes offered by Councilmember Smith.
I have also reviewed the League of Minnesota Cities material available
within the handbook concerning the Duties and Responsibilities of the
City Manager. It is my opinion that the job description that has been
developed encompasses those duties and responsibilities outlined by the
League and that are founded in State Law.
I recommend that you submit the attached Position Description, Managerial
Objectives, and City Manager Evaluation Form for Council approval.
POSITION DESCRIPTION
CITY OF EDINA
CITY MANAGER
OBJECTIVE
Plan and direct the administration of City functions as delegated by the
Optional Plan B and City Council to ensure efficient municipal services.:
and development in line with Council objectives.
SPECIFIC RESPONSIBILITIES
1) Direct and control all line operations of the municipality. Works
closely with department managers to plan and coordinate activities
and follows up to ensure effective service to the public and efficient
conduct of all municipal affairs.
2) Supervise all staff functions of the City. Responsible for all
strategic planning, financial reporting, human services, labor relations,
and all other City functions.
3) Develop and be responsible for effective utilization of appropriate
budgeting and administrative planning and control procedures. Ensures
that proper control reports and developed and used, supervises effective
operation of purchasing procedures, etc. Recommends changes in these
procedures to the Council as appropriate.
4) Be responsible for the development of an effective municipal organization.
Includes recommending changes in organization structure as appropriate,
working with department managers to ensure effective job design and
utilization of employees, recommending staffing changes or additions,
and recommending salary treatment and employee development activities.
Follows up to ensure effective implementation of approved recommendations.
5) Be responsible for the effective management and use of City assets.
Includes directing efficient use of present equipment and physical assets
and recommending additions or changes to the Council.
6) Be responsible for the effective management of financial assets.
Responsible to the Council to ensure effective investment of available
funds and proper accounting practices to control financial assets and
provide for financial planning.
7) Provide administrative support to the City Council. Prepares meeting
agendas, attends meetings to report on City operations, presents
recommendations concerning policies and objectives as well as specific
actions, participates in discussions as appropriate, and implements
Council decisions. Regularly keeps the Council fully advised of all
significant matters and effectively presents all items which require
Council action or approval. Responsible for Council and City records
including minutes, and enforcing City ordinances and resolutions, etc.
-2-
8) Be responsible for proper public relations. Coordinates and supervises
all public relations with the Mayor, Council Members,, department heads,
media, and citizens to make sure that public services are effectively
provided and that all complaints are properly addressed and.public
contracts are effectively handled. Participates in local affairs as
appropriate.
9) Stay abreast of innovations within the field of public administration
and cooperates with other governmental units and municipalities on
matters of mutual interest.
10) Participate in the work of AMM, LMC, and MLC sharing the responsibility
of representing the City within these organizations with the Mayor and
Council members.
11) Be responsible for appropriate City planning development,, and redevelop-
ment activities and provide overall supervision of the HRA administration.
12) Administer the affairs of the Manager's office effectively and in
accordance with Minnesota Law.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: 1987 MANAGERIAL OBJECTIVES
DATE: November 26, 1986
The City of Edina has prided itself in being an efficient operation.
I think this should always be the number one goal of the City Manager.
Compared to other communities of our size, we have operated with less
staff and less administration. The public opinion showed that our
constituents want to continue this method of operation. This does
not mean that we should end up being simply a janitor of the system
but rather use all of our creative thinking to discover new ways to
administer inexpensively and to service with a high degree of
efficiency. Specifically, I would hope to accomplish the following
objectives during 1987:
1) To meet the goals and objectives of the Strategic Plan as brought
forth by the City Council.
The City Council for the past several years has been involved in
developing strategic goals and objectives, both short term and long
range. As in the past, we have been able to accomplish the short -
term goals that the City Council has set forth. We feel strongly
we would like to accomplish the goals set forth by the City Council
in the 1987 Strategic Plan.
2) To complete and publish the Employee Personnel Rules Handbook.
The last time this was formally changed and brought up to date was in
1972. I feel strongly that these rules and regulations should be
completed this year. Some of the rules and regulations, may require
changes in the personnel ordinance which will require City Council
approval.
3) By year -end of 1987, to ensure that the new financial information
system be totally in place and all information reports be available
on a monthly basis to operating departments and City Council.
The Management Audit Committee indicated that we have a need to
update our financial reporting system. I am pleased to say that we had
already started the process in looking into such a system. We had
through Logis an historical bookkeeping system. The City of Edina
has challenged Logis to give us a different accounting and management
November 26, 1986
Mayor Courtney & Council Members
Page Two
information system. Although we are the first community of the 26
to ask Logis to do this, we feel strongly that we should succeed
in getting the job done. Many of the systems should start January
1, and throughout the year we will be adding to and correcting the
system as we see fit to service the City of Edina.
4) To make sure that plans and implementation strategies for the HRA
projects in the Grandview and Hedberg redevelopment districts are
developed.
5) To provide an analysis of the liquor operations in order to present the
City Council with information that it may be used in determination of
future direction of the liquor store operations.
City Manager Evaluation
The attached evaluation form is designed in order to assist Council
Members in their evaluation of the City Manager. Specifically, it is
to focus the evaluation process and serve as a discussion piece in order
to come to a consensus of the council in the performance evaluation
of the Manager.
The performance characteristics should be considered and rated based on
each Council members experience and observation. A point value is provided
for each rating as well as weighting of the proformance characteristics
so that a quantitative score is achieved.
0 pts. Not observed - insufficent information to rate
1 pts. Unsatisfactory — Does not perform at a level
acceptable to the City Council
2 pts. Expected - Performs at a level acceptable to
the City Council
3 pts. Above Expected - Performs at a level above that
expected by the City Council
4 pts. Outstanding - Far exceeds a level expected by
the City Council
City Manager -Goal Setting
a. Establishing App 0 1 2 3 4
b. Performance to achieve 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
Community Relationship
a. Responsiveness to public 0 1 2 3 4
b. Understanding of Community 0 1 2 3 4
uniqueness
Comments:
Organizational Leadership
a. Providing appropriate 0 1 2 3 4
organization direction
b. Developing subordinates 0 1 2 3 4
c. Understanding of 0 1 2 3 4
organizational operation
d. Decision making 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
Interorganizational cooperation
a. Neighboring Communities 0 1 2 3 4
b. Other Public Entities 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
CITY MANAGER EVALUATION
Please rate the following performance
characteristics
--------------- --
of the City Manager that best
reflects
your observations.
Not
Un-
Above
Observed Satisfactory Expected
Expected
Outstanding Total
Council-Manager Relationship
a. General
0
1
2
3
4
b. Responsibility to Council
0
1
2
3
4
c. Keeping Council informed
0
1
2
3
4
of significant issues
Comments:
City Manager -Goal Setting
a. Establishing App 0 1 2 3 4
b. Performance to achieve 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
Community Relationship
a. Responsiveness to public 0 1 2 3 4
b. Understanding of Community 0 1 2 3 4
uniqueness
Comments:
Organizational Leadership
a. Providing appropriate 0 1 2 3 4
organization direction
b. Developing subordinates 0 1 2 3 4
c. Understanding of 0 1 2 3 4
organizational operation
d. Decision making 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
Interorganizational cooperation
a. Neighboring Communities 0 1 2 3 4
b. Other Public Entities 0 1 2 3 4
Comments:
Task Perfomance
a.
Co..ncil Meeting presentation
0
1
2
3
4
b.
Administration of
0
1
2
3
4
organization
c.
Labor negotiations
0
1
2
3
4
d.
Policy development and
0
1
2
3
4
recommendation
e.
Handling of significant
0
1
2
3
4
issues
f.
Development and meeting of
0
1
2
3
4
organizational goals and
objects
g.
Development of organization
0
1
2
3
4
to meet needs & improvements
Comments:
COMMENTARY
Comments or thoughts as to:
a. Directions you would like to see either the organization or the Manager undertake.
b. Areas that either the organization or the Manager should be working to improve.
c. City Council performance /process (to be completed by Manager, Council Member optional).
D R A F T
CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROCESS
January: Council approves Manager's objectives for the year.
Mid -year: Manager reports to Council on progress toward
objectives.
September: At budget time, Council approves a salary range
for the Manager position.
December: Prior to a Council Meeting, Manager and Council
fill out evaluation form. At a 6:00 PM meeting
before the regular Council Meeting, the Council
will meet (without the Manager) to come to a
consensus on the Manager's performance and to
determine his salary and benefits for the
following year. Then the Manager will be
invited in, and the evaluation will take place.
The Manager will also evaluate Council performance.
42i
MISSION STATEMENT
VIII.E
THE MISSION OF THE CITY OF EDINA IS TO DO OUR PART IN MAINTAINING EDINA
_AS A PREMIER COMMUNITY IN THE TWIN CITIES AREA.
Key Words
"Our Part." Many factors contribute to Edina's success - -its schoc-1s, churches,
neighborhoods, and most of all, its residents., Our obligation is to do our
part; i.e. provide municipal services in a way that meets the standards
imposed by our constituency. If we do our part well, others will follow
our example.
"Maintaining as Premier." Premier means second to none. Edina has earned
the reputation of being a highly desirable place to live and work. We will
strive to maintain that reputation, guided by the following values:
Efficient and Effective Municipal Services. We will strive to provide the
most appropriate municipal services to the community. We will scrutinize new
programs or services before implementation to determine if they are most
appropriately provided by other governmental units or if they can best be
provided by our residents themselves or by private enterprise.
Fiscal Responsibility. We believe in a conservative approach to government
spending. We also believe that Edina should be principally responsible for
the generation of its revenue which results in a government which is most
responsive to its citizens.
Balanced Land Uses. We place a high value on protecting Edina's enormous
investment in single family homes. We also favor a diversity of land uses
including commercial, industrial, parkland and open space as well as housing
opportunities for all segments of the population, in order to provide a
complete community of the highest standards.
Metropolitan Citizenship. Edina is part of a larger community and as such
will participate in metropolitan issues, influence metropolitan policies
and assume a reasonable share of metropolitan obligations consistent with
our principles of local control.
Volunteers. Citizen participation is a key element in effective local
government. One of our greatest assets is our informed and involved
citizenry whom we will continue to involve in all practical aspects of
the governmental process.
Investment in Infrastructure. Maintenance of our public facilities in sound
condition makes economic sense by avoiding costly replacement and inefficient
operation. Furthermore, it encourages a similar investment by the private
sector. Therefore, we will strive to maintain our infrastructure through a
program of capital planning.
Innovation. Although we are not a business organization, we believe the
City should operate in a business -like manner. Creating value in our
services is important. Therefore, we must continually pursue better ways
to provide quality services to create greatest value for our citizens.
Human Resources. We recognize the importance of attracting and retaining
outstanding employees. We will, therefore, strive to be an employer who
provides a challenging and rewarding work experience.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 26, 1987
VIII.F
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY 3.2 BEER LICENSE
DATE: JANUARY 30, 1987
We have received an application for a temporary 3.2 beer license from
Our Lady of Grace Church, 5051 Eden Avenue.
The request has been made so that the church can serve beer at a church
function on Saturday, February 7, 1987 which will involve a dinner and
square dance from 7:00 to 11:00 P.M.
In April of 1986 the church applied for and was granted a temporary
3:2 beer license in connection with a bingo function. In checking with
Captain Kleven, Police Department, he said there were no problems in
connection with that event.
Approval for granting the license is recommended, subject to receipt by
the City of a certificate of insurance indicating liquor liability coverage
and naming the City as an added insured. The Police Department has
approved the license.
VIII. G.
lui�u�• � � �i• 14
TO: Kermeth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Feasibility Report - Authorize Bids
DATE: February 2, 1987
The following improvements have been investigated and it has been determined
that they are feasible and their construction would be in the best interest
of the overall development of the City of Edina:
I -'alwo 41 DI kN 0 W-49 • •
BA-277 - Permanent Surfacing & Curb & Gutter
Van Valkenburg I'Frk Parkln-g-Mts
#87 -3 - Lift Station Renovation
W. 41st Street etween terey & Lynn
#87 -4 Lift Station Renovation
ones Avenue & g ewood Avenue
#87 -5 Building Demolition & Removal
5106 & -5120 Brookside venue
(Old Public Works Building - Part of BRA
Project)
ESTIMP,TED COST
$53,856.00
$28,500.00
$28,000.00
$54,000.00
The above listed project improvements are ready for bids. The projects are
in our 1987 capital improvement plans.
A bried description of each project follows:
BA -277 - This project completes the gravel base, pavement and curb
& gutter for Van Valkenberg Park.
Improvement No. 87 -3 & No. 87 -4 are sanitary sewer lift station
renovations. Basically, the existing systems are the
original systems in the Morningside community. These are
a part of our aging infrastructure which needs upgrading.
Recently, the City renovated two other stations in Morningside
area:
Improvement No. 87 -5 is the building demolition and removal necessary to
construct the joint HRA /Jerry's Shopping Complex as approved'earlier.
The staff would recommend that the Council authorize taking bids on these
projects. The proposed bid opening would be February 26, 1987.
IX. A.
Consent
Agenda
M E M O R A N D.0 M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitariana
SUBJECT: 1987 Laboratory Services Agreement -
for Hennepin County
DATE: January 29, 1987
Attached herewith are two copies of the 1987 Environmental
Health Laboratory Service Agreement - between the Tri City
Laboratory and Hennepin County. This agreement is the same
as previous laboratory services agreementsand the cost per
laboratory procedures allows us a 3% profit margin.
This agreement has a maximum cap of $2500.00 for calendar
year 1987. In 1986, the Tri City Laboratory billed the
county for approximately $600.00 of testing.
The Tri City Laboratory will continue to provide residential
well water testing for residents of Hennepin County. Any
county resident can bring in a well water sample and we charge
the resident $9.00 per sample tested. This service is not
included in the attached agreement.
I would recommend City Council approval of this agreement.
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and Manager are
hereby authorized and directed to enter into Contract No. 70168 with the
County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, whereby the County, through its
Community Health Department, agrees to make payments to the City of
Edina for analytical and microbiological laboratory support services, for
the term from January 1, 1987 through December 31, 1987, not to exceed
$2,500.00.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of February, 1987.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and Acting City Clerk for the City of
Edina, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 2, 1987, and
as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 3rd day of February, 1987.
City Clerk
1987 Ci iF EDINA CHECK R DER 02 -02 -87 :E 1
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIP
026823 01/14/87 580.27 PAUL KENNEDY ADVERT GEN SUPPLIES
580.27 *
* * * * **
033004 01/26/87 53.71 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27 -2010- 000 -00
53.71 * ;;4
— 033008
10 -2010- 000 -00 10358
* ** —CKS °I
e!
033012
033013
033013
033613
'I
033017
033031
033031_
.I 033031
033031
033031
�I
01/26/87
01/26/87
01/26/87
01 /26/87_ -_ -__
01/26/87
01/26/87
01/26/87
__01/26/87_
01/26/87
01/26/87
01/26/87
131.84-_
131.84 *
25.95
•
i
- - - -- — -- -- - _ - -- -- - -- *** —CKS
in 1
is
— KAMAN BEARING_- 6_SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010- 000 -00
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 89548 Z, •.
13.92 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1234
44_ 16 _ ALTERNATOR.
REBUILD--GEN SUPPLY ._ —__ -- 1 0- 4504 - 440 -44._ 1232_
128.85 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5893E
186.93 *
_ 224.00 ALLIED PLASTICS___,
224.00
12.84
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 160 -16 265719
_19__74
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE_
SUPPLIES
10- 451.6 - 200 -20
74.06
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 510 -51
32.40
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 510 -51 265719
3.22
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 600 -60
142.26 *
.1
*** —CKS
*** —CKS
IA `1
Il ;
nni
033037
01/28/87
25.00
BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -2010- 000 -00
04022
—
033037
01/28/87
1,154_93_
_BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
CONST
60- 20100 =0 000 -00
03581
30
0337
8%
01/287
2,598.40
BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
CONST
60 -2010- 000 -00
04059
y
3,776.33
—
033049
01/28/87
30_50
BURESH ROBERT
MEETINGS
10- 4206_440 -44
"i
633049
01/28/87
42.77
BURESH ROBERT
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 440 -44
73.27
033054
01_/26/87
91_32
BATTERY_ WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
80415
033054
01/26/87
67.70
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
78425
ti�,gl
033054
01/26/87
48.45
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
80363
.1
*** —CKS
*** —CKS
IA `1
Il ;
nni
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -02-87 PAGE 2
CHECK _NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR - __ITEM_D.E$CR
033054
4I
+ +r+rr
01/26/87 41.19 BATTERY WAREHOUSE
-- -- ------ - -• - - -- 248.66. - + - --- --- ------ - - - - --
01/26/87
033082 01/28/87
033082 - - -- - 01/26/87
- - + +rrrr - - --
033090
77.65
77.65 r
BROCK WHITE
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
27- 2010 - 000-00 78356
10 -2010- 000 -00 A01974
44.50 CONWAY _ FIRE _6 SAFETY__ ----- EQUIP MAINT __,___ 1 -0- 4274 - 440 =44 -891 04.
489.00 CONWAY FIRE 6 SAFETY CONT REPAIRS 27 -2010- 000 -00 80798
533.50 r
01/26/87 _ 300_00- CERT POWER TRAIN PAR1
300.00 r
3
4
+++ -CKS 7 �.
P
I�
+++ -CKS
4i.
+ ++ -CKS
12.
033091 01 /26/87 1.07.25 CITY OF EDINA - __. _ .__ WATER1 0 -2010- 000 -00_
033091 01/26/87 217.36 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 2010 - 000 -00
033091 01/26/87 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 20 -2010- 000 -00 ;,i-
033091 01/28/87 36600 -_ CITY OF_EDINA_- RUBBISH REM.O�L 50 -- 2010 - 000- - -O 83 ��i
033091 01/26/87 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50 -2010- 000 -00 -
033091 01/26/87 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50- 2010 - 000 -00
033091 CITY -OF- EDINA._ .__- _RUBSI_SM REMQVAL_ -- 5_0= 425.Q= 82L-_82 -8.3
893.91 +
033116 01/26/87 200.48 DIESEL SERVICE CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56
- - - - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- -20_0 _48- *---- - - --.� - -- �'
' rssrr+
- - -- - - - -- -- - -- - - -- - - - - - - - -- - - -- -- +++ -CKS 14_.
I
j 033121 01/26/87- 286.09 DOALL TWIN CITIES CO TOOLS 10 -4580- 301 -30 30�.
286.09 +
rrrrrr - - - - -- - r ++-CKS -- - - -'"
•3
_033125
o,/26/87 MERIT SUPPLY -_ -. PARTS -1.0 -2010- 000. - 00_15698
033125- 01/26/87 100.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 390 -30 16018 poi
033125 01/26/87 100.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 520 -52 16018 s9
_ 033125_ -- ____._01/26/87- .- ___- -_._ -_ 450.90 •- -_ -___ -MERIT SUPPLY _ _ _- .CLEANING SUPP1IE6 1 0 -451 2- 540 -54- 1 59 1 4-- .-- _- .------ - -_ -�°
033125 01/28/87 985.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 16007 °1
I °z
033125 01/26/87 338.00 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15982 �°3
_ 033125 01/2REPAIR-PARTS _ 224.16 MERIT - SUPPLY REPAIR-PARTS 10- 4540- 540 - 54- _.15979
033125 01/26%87 253.20 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15899
i 033125 01/26/87 225.16 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 15979
033125 -_- 01/26/87_ 225__16- MERIT_SUPPLY - CORRECTION 1.0-4540- 540- S4.J5979 °n
033125 01/26/87 492.50 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4544 - 802 -80 15949
'! 033125 01/26/87 492.50- MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 10- 4544 - 802 -80 15949
+- 033125_ 01/26/87 143_10 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10_4620_560 -56 15985 72
n 033125 01/26/87 437.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 15921 73
° 033125 01/26/87 1,402.00 MERIT SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 27 -4248- 661 -66 16030 „'
.1987 G )F EDINA CHECK R TER 02 -02 -87 :E 3
___CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
I'. "I.
A
,VENDOR.-__-- -
033125
01/28/87
498.00
MERIT SUPPLY
033125 _
_ 01 /26/87
-_ - 492.50
MERIT SUPPLY
033125
01/26/87
492.50
-
MERIT SUPPLY
033125
01/26/87
492.50
MERIT SUPPLY
033125 _
_ -_-
01/26/87
—_ -..
492.5_0
MERIT SUPPLY
01/26/87
6.58-
7,396.61 r
_ --
033150
- _01/26/87 - Y
_ — 33.97
_ 033131
01/28/87
349.70
ASPLUND COFFEE
--- - - - - --
- - - - --
349.70 +
'I
033160
033136
0126%97
14,128.11
EARL F ANDERSEN
14,128.11 r
CONT REPAIRS
PA I NT
PAINT
PAINT
27 -4248- 661 -66 16034
40.- 4544 -802- 80_15946
40 -4544- 802 -80 15901
40- 4544 - 802 -80 15949
A A_ar A A ....... .... A
CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 703 -70 07662
CONST
10- 1445 - 000 -00 67722
033143 01/26/87 - -�_ 14.81 - EMRICH BAKING .CO_ __CONCESSIONS 27 -4642- 663-66 _
- - - -- 14.a1 r
i
21
I
7
PI
119 0
111'
rrr -CKS I; 9j
u�
rrr -CKS i-,
GEN SUPPLIES_,
10- 4504 - 641 -64
61218
I'. "I.
033146
01/26/87
950.00
GREEN ACRES SPKL
*00-CKS
I
REPAIR PARTS
950.00 +
12460
CREDIT
10 -2010- 000 -00
16150
_.REPAIR PARTAS
033150
- 01%26%87
22.87
ELECTRONIC CENTER
033150
01/26/87
6.58-
ELECTRONIC CENTER
033150
- _01/26/87 - Y
_ — 33.97
i
50.26 +
_
'I
033160
01/28/87
521.00
FLOYD LOCK 6 SAFE CO
521.00 +
r'
033183
01/26%87
202.50
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
L:
202.50 +
1_033188
_01/26/87
124.91
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
033188
01/26/87
271.95
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO _
.I
033188
01/26/87
58.23
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
- --
033188
- 01/28/87 - _
— _7_86_
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
462.95
i
21
I
7
PI
119 0
111'
rrr -CKS I; 9j
u�
rrr -CKS i-,
GEN SUPPLIES_,
10- 4504 - 641 -64
61218
I'. "I.
*00-CKS
I
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
12460
CREDIT
10 -2010- 000 -00
16150
_.REPAIR PARTAS
40 -2010- 000 -00
14590
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 390 -30 35439
TS
69790
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 282639
REPAIR PARAAS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 280052
REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 27824
OMP A i o o AD T Q
033194 01/26/87 37.30 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10 -4294- 560 -56 73069
rrr -CKS
*00-CKS
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02-02-87 PACE
_�wso AMOUNT _YswowR----_—' _-____—zJEMLQsoCw nxOuItC- mmmws_
033194 01/26/87 72.50 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10-4294-560-56 p I
E7.53 PETTY CASH PHOTOGRAPHY 10-4200-500-50
033203 01/28/87 4.73 PETTY CASH MUN CAUCAS 10-4202-160-16
033203 01/28/87 3.70 PETTY CASH PARKING 10-4204-120-12
033203 01/28/87 6.SO PETTY CASH PARKING 10-4eO4-140-14
033203 01/e8/87 42.28 PETTY CASH PARKING 10-4206-160-16
033203 01/28/87 42.7S PETTY CASH PARKING 10-4206-200-20
033203 01/28/87 3.SO PETTY CASH PARKING 10 4208 140-14
033203 01/28/87 4.03 PETTY CASH MIEAGE/LOGIS 10-4208-160-16
033203 01/28/87 7 . 77 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10-4208-800-80
033eO3 01/eS/87 18.01 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10-4e90-140-14 127
033203 01/28/87 14.04 PETTY CASH PHOTO DEV 10-4SO4-140-14
0 33203 01/28/87 .16.47 PETTY CASH PHOTO 10-4504-140-14
033203 01/28/87 4.2S PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504-200-20
033203 01/28/87 4.77 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4SO4-e6O-26
033203 01/28/87 1.86 PETTY CASH SUPPLLIES 10-4504-510-51
033PO3 01/28/87 46.50 PETTY CASH SUPPLLIES 10-4504-6e7-6e
033203 01/28/87 ee.Se PETTY CASH SUPP/PARKING 10-4SOS-133-12
033203 01/28/87 ll.so PETTY CASH MEETING 10-4SO6-140-14
033203 01/28/87 16.80 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 23-4290-610-61
033203 01/28/87 16.23 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 40-4SO4-800-80
033209 01/26/87 11.14 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 914096
033209 01/26/87 82.68 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-S60-56 916219
033209 01/26/87 3e.83 GENUINE PARTS PARTSi 10-46e07560-S6 914478 57
eo
033214 01/26/87 ll.so TOLL COMPANY- UELD I NA-Aue-EL I-Es IQ-
11.50
033218 01/28/87 1,345.15 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 10-4618-560-56 28775 71,
q 033218 01/28/87 696.50 HALLMAN LUBRICANTS 72!
J13
� ^
. . ..
1987 C JF EDINA CHECK F TER 02 -02 -87 GE 5
i
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE
i
' -�! rrrrrr
033220 01/26/87 148.80 HAR NED LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 016275 �
_ 033220 01/26/87 63.90_ HAR NED _LUMBER CO_ REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 5629 I, °;
033220 01%26%87 196.00 HAR NED LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 016466 =1
408.70 r y
rsrsrr
000-CKS
- 033248 _ 01/26/.87--- 60.93 - HARMON GLASS CONT REPARRS 10 =4248- 560 -56 125467 I1'
60.93
rrrrrr F
T-
I
033251 01/28/87 106,704.81 HRA DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 i,-
_ 106,704.81 r
rrrrrr rrr -CKS
033275 01/28/87 53.04 INTERSTATE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 013094 �a
53.04 s ,
I3 I.
rrrsr� rrr -CKS
033279 01/26/87 8.48 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE_ GEN SUPPLIES -_ _ _10 -2010- 000 -00_-
033279 01/26/87 49.08 - JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
033279 01/26/87 12.79 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00
033279 _ _ O 1 /26/87 _ 14.98 _ JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE _ GEN_ SUPPLIES 0- 201 0- 000 - -00_
033279 01/26/87 62.86 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
r 033279 01/26/87 61.18 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
033279 01/26/87 17.98 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE '---GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 2010,- 000 -00
.fI033279 01/26/87 51.98 JERRYS-OUR-OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 !`
033279 01/26/87 52.30 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 „1
033e79 01/26/87 01/26/87 18.87 JERRYS OUR OWN_ HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 201_0_- 000 -00
033279 01/26/87 34.53 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 °
r 033279 01/26/87 10.77 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 X90.
033279 01/26/87.____ _ _ 56._06 _JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000- 00.____ - _- ___���
033279 01/26/87 - 78.54 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 '
033279 01/26/87 1.67 JERRYS OUR OWN HOWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00
033279___01/26/87 _11.09 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE_ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00
X033279 - 01/26/87 22.28 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 5
033279 01/26/87 19.96 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 2010- 000 -00
9�
__- 033279 01/26/87 31__26 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 - -.- - °°
033279 - 01/26/87 - 11.39 - -� JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00 °1
;I 033279 01/26/87 45.06 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 j8;,A
- 033279 01/26/87 3.76 JERRYS -OUR OWN _HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 201 -0- 000 -00 h
033279 01/26/87 10.32 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -2010- 000 -00
033279 - 01/26/87 - - - - -- 2.45 - JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 2010 - 000 -00 - -` - °'I
I °,Ir
033279_ _01/26/87 _14.25 -_ JERRYS-OUR-OWN HDWE _ CORRECTION_- 10 74504- 440 -44 -
033279 01/26/87 14.25 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CORRECTION 10- 4504 - 801 -80 '
033279 01/26/87 128.55 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -2010- 000 -00
_033279_ 01_/26/87 128_55- JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CORRECTION_ 27_2010- 000 -00 771
033279 01/26/87 16.37 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -2010- 000 -00 'i
^I 033279 01/26/87 13.22 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -2010- 000 -00 ;;1
� 6
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -02 -87 PAGE 6
_ CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
_._----
ITEM__D.ESCRIPTION
- ALP _Q M_MES.SACE_
_,
033279
01/26/87
5.98
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
27 -2010- 000 -00
I,i
_- 033279
01/26/87
JERRYS OUR OWN
HDWE
PARTS __-
27- 2010-000 -00.
4
033279
01/26/87
14.25
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 2010 - 000 -00
033279
01/26/87
26.48
JERRYS OUR OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 2010 - 000 -00
,'
_033279
_ 01/26/87
— 14_25-
JERRYS OUR _OWN
HDWE_
CORRECTION
033279
01/26/87
14.25
JERRYS OUR OWN
HDWE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -80
784.49 *
'
I
sss
`'
,
. 03328601
/26/87
--- 7.69 7.69JUSTUS
LUMBER
LUMBER_ - _ __ --
10 -2010- 000 - 0044339__—
=CKS
-I
033286
01%26/87
174.30
JUSTUS LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
44995
"
033286
01/26/87
179.96
JUSTUS LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 2010 - 000 -00
44363
' 033286 _
01/26/87_
228._00__.___
-___. JUSTUS LUMBER_-
REPAIR PARTS_ -.—
- 10 -2010- 000 - 00_44838
-
033286
01/26/87
40.21
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
10 -2010- 000 -00
43874
630.16
sss -CKS
_ 033292
_11445_00HARRIS
_HOMEYER
CO-
_.I
1,445.00 •
- ststtt -
-- -- - - - - --
- - --
- -- - - -- -
- - --
— -
arm- CK8 -
X31.
- -'
�
--
033304
01/26/87
34.96
KNOX LUMBER CO
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
464155
033304 -_
. 01 /26/87 _ _ ..
58. 53 -----..KNOX
LUMBER CO
_ _
_ REPAIR _PARTS _ __.___- - -__
1 0- 4540 - 520 -52.
464
033304
'
01/26/87
97.91
KNOX LUMBER CO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
494654
033304
01/26/87
256.36
KNOX LUMBER CO
REPAIR PARTAS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
464159
" -_ 033304 _
01/26/87 _ -_-
12.32
_ .
_ KNOX,LUMBER.CO
__
__ GEN SUPPLIES--28-4504-70e-70
033304
01/26/87
46.14
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 702 -70
494650
' 033304
'
01/26/87
102.90
KNOX LUMBER CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
464505
609.12 s
strstt
033331 01/26/87
033331 01/26/87
•'i tttttt
033342 01/26/87
033342 01/26/87
� sstttt
033344
I•,ZI --- M +ysst
�9
�Inl tttttt
01/28/87
sss -CKS t4 7
520.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 14-
6,875.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 38549
-- - - -- 7, 395. 00! - - - - -- - - -
459.36 - --
11.64
471 _0_0_
50.00
50.00 s
217,752.34 s
sss - CKS -�
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 2010 - 000 -00 70848
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 X91
sss -CKS I „
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 449 -44
sss -CKS
7,;
!J
_ s��_CKS..._i'y
.1987C OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR
CHECK I TER
'i 033352 01/26/87 36.87 MUNICILITE CO
36.87
PARTS
0e-02-87 GE 7
033360 01/26/87 18.10 MINNESOTA WANNER REPAIR PARTS 10-2010-000-00 064913
033360 01/26/87 58.50
WANNER REPAIR PARTS
76.60 *
033413 01/26/87 172.26 NATIONWIDE PAPERS
- ----- -- -------
121.80 OFFSET PRINTING
121.80
033443 01/28/87 se.so POMMER MANUFACTURING CO.
J 82.50
033446 01/26/87 24.26 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
,______033446 01/26/87 1-6.97 L
-- PIONEER RIM & WHEEL
40.33 *
1033490 01/26/87 26.99
26.99 —
GEN SUPPLY
PRINTING
27-4504-664-66 012240
10-4600-420-42 27408
REPAIR PARTS 10-2010-000-00 44245
RFPAT9 PARTS ln.A=AA_=&n_r& .4-
REPAIR PARTAS
REPAIR PARTS
CORRECTION
REPAIR PARATS
10-4540-560-56 14190
10-4540-560-56 14605
16-4540-S60-56 14605
10-4540-560-56 14605
REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 52825
PARTS 10-2010-006-06 M383_85
n.
il!_*�_
__C s
Ic.
t-?0_7CKS__l"
***-CKS
r.
*so-CKS
32'
*00-CKS
zn
***-lCKS i,`I.
In
6711
000-CKS
70
711
721
731
741
751
_*.q�ltmCK S__ 7
033452
01/26/87
39.04
QUICK SERV
BATTERY
0334S2__._____01/26/87_
_92, 84
QUICK SERV
BATTERY
033452
01/26/87
92.84-
QUICK SERV
BATTERY
033452
01/26/87
92.84
QUICK SERV
BATTERY
.033452 --
- -- 01/26/87
119.74 .r
QUICK SERV
BATTERY
251.62
033455
01/26/87
74.88
RITEWAY
74.88
033486
01/26/87
107.70
DON STREICHER GUNS
107.70
1033490 01/26/87 26.99
26.99 —
GEN SUPPLY
PRINTING
27-4504-664-66 012240
10-4600-420-42 27408
REPAIR PARTS 10-2010-000-00 44245
RFPAT9 PARTS ln.A=AA_=&n_r& .4-
REPAIR PARTAS
REPAIR PARTS
CORRECTION
REPAIR PARATS
10-4540-560-56 14190
10-4540-560-56 14605
16-4540-S60-56 14605
10-4540-560-56 14605
REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 52825
PARTS 10-2010-006-06 M383_85
n.
il!_*�_
__C s
Ic.
t-?0_7CKS__l"
***-CKS
r.
*so-CKS
32'
*00-CKS
zn
***-lCKS i,`I.
In
6711
000-CKS
70
711
721
731
741
751
_*.q�ltmCK S__ 7
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02-02-87 PAGE a
_
_AM_Q
_Y - __-_'_---_ --_----
.
` 03349e
01/e6/e7
.yu- - ''-oouTooALs
FORD - '-'-__-nspazR
GEN SUPPLIES 1
p*Rr_
PART.-----I
0-4540-S60-56-137008------.--...-----.
.,
�-_-�-_'|"|
wss*ya
01/26/87
31.90
Sour*oALs rmno
nspAzm
p*nrm
136621
_!
033*92
01ve6/87
rs.as
wouT*owLs ropo
Rspwxn
PARTS
10-4540-560-s6
136330
***-omo |..
03350e
01/e6/e7
4.53
ougomeAw c*svRoLsr
RspAze
pwnTo
10-*s40-560-s6
6e36e
[)
.�
ososoa
01/26/87
4.62
ououeoAw oxsvnoLsr
nsp*ze
PARTS
10-*s40-560-56
6776e
os3soe____n1vea/o7
15.97
SUBURBAN oxsvnoLsr
nspAzm_p*oTm
0-*54 0-560-56
-67916
wossna
01/26/87
10.69
ououRoAw cosvmoLsr
REPAIR
PARTS
10-*s40-560-56
68389
033soe
ov/ea/ar
10.80
ouaueoAw oosvnoLsr
nsp*zm
PARTS
10-45*0-560-56
67713
/.`
03350e- ---01/26/87
-
-----__-_ s.ao'owBuemAm-CHEVROLET
'-_
-ns���
se�ay *
`
033503
_01/e6/8
4.s3
SUBURBAN _PLUMB SUP
REPAIR
-P
w���
033503
01/26/87
91.90
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR
PARTS
10-4540-646-64
`m*.4" ~
******
0 - s&s__-_'�1��
12S. 86 *
033soa ovvea/or
0 33s0 8 -.01 /28/87
033sn8 01/28/87
033sn8 01/26/87
******
___ ____
nz3sI � *I/ea/e7
033s16 01/e6/87
033s16 _o1/26/e7 ----
"
27.36 or PAUL ooOw
GEN SUPPLY 10-4504-301-30
sounw �
e�*7 as�nm no
ae.sw nsAmm ROEBUCK
1e8.78- _- -_SswRS_mosounw
ae4.os *
�-
033551 01/ee/87 929.20
'. _w3.3s51 -0-1 /28/87 - e,6s_
ya7.as ~
`!
`
----`'-------
033s73 01/e6/87 *4e.3e
033S73 01/28/87 9_50 -
`i *61.e8 *
^ ../
/
033s75
�
GEN SUPPLIES 1
10-4504-540-S4 18101
033s75
�
47.94 ST PAUL aoow
OFFICE-SUPPLY--. 0-4S16-140-14-370.925
_-___s.00______oT PAUL BOOK
v«r.ns ST p*uL moow
OFFICE SUPPLIES 10-4SI6-600-60 371199
uwzrommw uwLznzTso uwzr ALLOW 10-e010-000-00
uml_EOgMoumLzMzTso__ ____Gs ______
wooa Gsm auppLzsS 10-4504-375-30 1ee79
vmow osm auppLzES 10-4904-Rxm-99 "Pp7A
01/e6/87 79.3e WATER pRmouoTo wspAsm pwRra 40-4S40-801-80 0e1008
---``---------------`-------------`---'------`-` - ----------`---------------------------------'---
GEN SUPPLIES 1
10-4504-540-S4 18101
uwzrommw uwLznzTso uwzr ALLOW 10-e010-000-00
uml_EOgMoumLzMzTso__ ____Gs ______
wooa Gsm auppLzsS 10-4504-375-30 1ee79
vmow osm auppLzES 10-4904-Rxm-99 "Pp7A
01/e6/87 79.3e WATER pRmouoTo wspAsm pwRra 40-4S40-801-80 0e1008
---``---------------`-------------`---'------`-` - ----------`---------------------------------'---
'1987 C JF EDINA
CHECK R TER
02 -02 -87 vE 9
--
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. MESSAGE
CERT HYDRAULIC SPEC
T-
487.12 r
-_-
_ _- _
- MIDWAY IND -S-UP-P---CO
GEN SUPP
ROGERS CABLE SYS -
98870
11
=
033575
01/26/87
475.00
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 803 -80
029842
ADVANCE UNITED EXP -
- GEN SUPPLIES
--
- - - - -
- -- -- - --
-- - 554_32 * - -
- -- - - - - -- - - - - -
- -
--
-
-�'
I�3
_
wwwssr
f0 -4620- 560 -56
32666
rrw -CKS
+
033578
01/26/87
271.36
WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -2010- 000 -00
101323
1=
r
033578
01/26/87
205.23
WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
'
GEN SUPPLY
476.59 w
696147
_ _
033579
01/26/87
107.98
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
60742
033579
01/26/87
- 55.83 _ -
- WILLIAMS ,STEEL- HDWE__
-- _TOOLS - -__ -_
10 -4580- 301 -30-
62247-
033579
01/26/87
52.92
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
61176
216.73 w
L-
rwrsrr
"I
033586 01/28/87 -- _264.63_
- -- - -- - - -- - -- 264.63 w
' rrrrrr
' 033591 01/28/87 41.16
41.16 r
„, rwrrrr
03370j--
i
033704 01/26/87
033705 01/2087
033706 01%26%87
033707 01/26/87
I
033708 01/26/87
- - - - - - - -- rrrCK3 - -- 1
.:3
W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 50= 4540 = 821 -82 .:
_27'
I
CECELIA SMITH MILEAGE 10 -4208- 140 -14
000-CKS
299.95
-CONST FASTEN SYST
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
8523
13.
299.95
CERT HYDRAULIC SPEC
487.12 r
150.75
- MIDWAY IND -S-UP-P---CO
GEN SUPP
ROGERS CABLE SYS -
98870
01/26/87
10- 4504 - 325 -30
150.75
w
121.73 r
33.88
ADVANCE UNITED EXP -
- GEN SUPPLIES
- 10 -2010- 000 -00
33.88
w
`
165.76
EIDE SAW 3ERV
PARTS
f0 -4620- 560 -56
32666
165.76
+
;I
1,022.39
INTERN SALT COMP
SALT
10 -2010- 000 -00
101323
1,022.39
r
3 ^I
75.00
CDP -
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 540 -54
696147
033712 01/26/87
REPAIR PARTS - 10 -2010- 000 -00 013406
CONT REPAIRS 10 -2010- 000 -00
CONT REPAIRS 10 -2010- 000 -00
REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540- 560 -56 143216
81.07 POWER PROCESS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 08092
"�
lees
75.00 +
033709
01/26/87
487.12
CERT HYDRAULIC SPEC
487.12 r
033710
01/26/87
69.17 _
ROGERS CABLE SYS -
033710
01/26/87
52.56
ROGERS CABLE SYS
121.73 r
033711
01/26/87
56.23
CHESLEY FREIGHT
56.23 w
033712 01/26/87
REPAIR PARTS - 10 -2010- 000 -00 013406
CONT REPAIRS 10 -2010- 000 -00
CONT REPAIRS 10 -2010- 000 -00
REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540- 560 -56 143216
81.07 POWER PROCESS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 08092
"�
lees
1987 cI7, OF soIwA
,
-- --`-`--- '— ---'
^|
033713 01/e6/87
-.
`
1 /26/87r---'
033715 ov/ea/oT
.�
. ..
'^
- -
-
033717
01/26/87 126.97 DAVID BLOOD UNIFORM
--
.
-
033718 01/2 87
'
-
-
-- -
-
033719 01/e6/87
--
- - -
- - --- '--
'-
0337e0 -1 /aa/er
0337eu 01/e6/87
ALLOW --__�_ _�- -_�-_�_-_-' _-
1e6' 97
150.00 ospr OF puoLzu TsLspuOws asmv 10-4268-420-42 86
_ _w7_ n� w
lsn.ww
as.+s z o psrsRmow asmv TOOLS 10-*580-56*-s6 5198+
e3.4s
19.e0 SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS, 10-4540-803-80 4em34
�
�
_ SUPERIOR PLASTIC _ REPAIR PARTS _ ''
�
033721 01/26/87 36s.es oum sLsCrmxo CORP Gsw oupper 10-e010-*00-00 792471 '
_ _ ________ _____________saS^es-y�--____-__ -' ___'_-__----_________� ---'------'--'-------------------''�
`
*337ee 01/e6/87 17s.4s wsoT usLo wsLozwm ouppLY 10-e010-000-00 63143 `
� woorae w!/ea/er _ers.es________Wswr' WELD '- ---__'csw-wuppLz._____��-2VJ w—nwu�nw-a�w�a-._____--_-_-_
] **a.rw *
033723 01/26/87 � .
07.36 �
��r��M�WsLoz
'. 107.36 ~ ^`
r'.
� 033724L_ _*1/26/e7131'e8 _-THE .AMERICAN �STORE - --_.-_-
�]
`�__03sres 01/e6/8 ?s^e0posoT_souzp-oo-'--___---_ospwze_p*nT �
m^s*o-sao-sa_ea3s
0337es 01ve6v87 401.60 pesSr smwzp CO mspwzm PARTS 10-4S40-s60-S6 a63sI
~
S76.80
* -
'
wozrea 01/e6a87 179.30 arsuwRT Lumosm RspAzm pweTa 14-4s40-se0-Se 71e663
179.30
033727 01/26/87 40.00 HENN CO CHIEFS OF DUES 10-4204-420-42
`
, . **.00 *
,
_- -
.'�
033728
�M
�
01/26/87 40.00 *sww co coxsro OF ousw
40. 00 *
_
1^7es.** ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PRINTING
10-4600-420-42 13908
CHECK REGISTER
02-02-87 PAGE 10
AMOUNT
VENDOR
464.00
OSWALD FIRE HOSE
TOOLS
10-4580-301-30
8562 In
464.00
d
63.75
AM CONVERTORS INC
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560—S6
6260
79.62
GARLANDS INC
GEN SUPPLY
10-4504-646-64
01023
27.13
T & C DODGE INC
REPAIR PARTS
10-4S40—S60—S6
4170
01/26/87 126.97 DAVID BLOOD UNIFORM
--
.
-
033718 01/2 87
'
-
-
-- -
-
033719 01/e6/87
--
- - -
- - --- '--
'-
0337e0 -1 /aa/er
0337eu 01/e6/87
ALLOW --__�_ _�- -_�-_�_-_-' _-
1e6' 97
150.00 ospr OF puoLzu TsLspuOws asmv 10-4268-420-42 86
_ _w7_ n� w
lsn.ww
as.+s z o psrsRmow asmv TOOLS 10-*580-56*-s6 5198+
e3.4s
19.e0 SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS, 10-4540-803-80 4em34
�
�
_ SUPERIOR PLASTIC _ REPAIR PARTS _ ''
�
033721 01/26/87 36s.es oum sLsCrmxo CORP Gsw oupper 10-e010-*00-00 792471 '
_ _ ________ _____________saS^es-y�--____-__ -' ___'_-__----_________� ---'------'--'-------------------''�
`
*337ee 01/e6/87 17s.4s wsoT usLo wsLozwm ouppLY 10-e010-000-00 63143 `
� woorae w!/ea/er _ers.es________Wswr' WELD '- ---__'csw-wuppLz._____��-2VJ w—nwu�nw-a�w�a-._____--_-_-_
] **a.rw *
033723 01/26/87 � .
07.36 �
��r��M�WsLoz
'. 107.36 ~ ^`
r'.
� 033724L_ _*1/26/e7131'e8 _-THE .AMERICAN �STORE - --_.-_-
�]
`�__03sres 01/e6/8 ?s^e0posoT_souzp-oo-'--___---_ospwze_p*nT �
m^s*o-sao-sa_ea3s
0337es 01ve6v87 401.60 pesSr smwzp CO mspwzm PARTS 10-4S40-s60-S6 a63sI
~
S76.80
* -
'
wozrea 01/e6a87 179.30 arsuwRT Lumosm RspAzm pweTa 14-4s40-se0-Se 71e663
179.30
033727 01/26/87 40.00 HENN CO CHIEFS OF DUES 10-4204-420-42
`
, . **.00 *
,
_- -
.'�
033728
�M
�
01/26/87 40.00 *sww co coxsro OF ousw
40. 00 *
_
1^7es.** ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PRINTING
10-4600-420-42 13908
033721 01/26/87 36s.es oum sLsCrmxo CORP Gsw oupper 10-e010-*00-00 792471 '
_ _ ________ _____________saS^es-y�--____-__ -' ___'_-__----_________� ---'------'--'-------------------''�
`
*337ee 01/e6/87 17s.4s wsoT usLo wsLozwm ouppLY 10-e010-000-00 63143 `
� woorae w!/ea/er _ers.es________Wswr' WELD '- ---__'csw-wuppLz._____��-2VJ w—nwu�nw-a�w�a-._____--_-_-_
] **a.rw *
033723 01/26/87 � .
07.36 �
��r��M�WsLoz
'. 107.36 ~ ^`
r'.
� 033724L_ _*1/26/e7131'e8 _-THE .AMERICAN �STORE - --_.-_-
�]
`�__03sres 01/e6/8 ?s^e0posoT_souzp-oo-'--___---_ospwze_p*nT �
m^s*o-sao-sa_ea3s
0337es 01ve6v87 401.60 pesSr smwzp CO mspwzm PARTS 10-4S40-s60-S6 a63sI
~
S76.80
* -
'
wozrea 01/e6a87 179.30 arsuwRT Lumosm RspAzm pweTa 14-4s40-se0-Se 71e663
179.30
033727 01/26/87 40.00 HENN CO CHIEFS OF DUES 10-4204-420-42
`
, . **.00 *
,
_- -
.'�
033728
�M
�
01/26/87 40.00 *sww co coxsro OF ousw
40. 00 *
_
1^7es.** ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PRINTING
10-4600-420-42 13908
033728
�M
�
01/26/87 40.00 *sww co coxsro OF ousw
40. 00 *
_
1^7es.** ~
HENNEPIN COUNTY
PRINTING
10-4600-420-42 13908
' 1987 t OF EDINA CHECK 1 TER 02 -02 -87 GE 11
r _ _CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - VENDOR - - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE
033730 _ 01/26/87 264.00 EDINA FIREMENS - - - -EQUIP RENAL 10- 4226 - 4.40 -44 �a
264.00 • - -- - -__ - - - -- -- - -'s
6
7'
033731 _ _ 01/28/87 - 99.76 CONTRACT__ MOBILE COMM CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 4689
033731 01/26/87 469.50 CONTRACT MOBILE COMM __ REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 7696
033731 01/26/87 396.10 CONTRACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 802 -80 4976 !�
I
- - - -- - -. _ --..- - - .- - --- -- - - -- - - -- -•- .965,36 +_ -_ -.. _- --._.... - - - -- __ - - - - - - -- ---- ._ - - - - -- - - -- --- ----------- - - -,�
033732 01/26/87 56.60 C R S DIST INC CRAFT SUPPLY 23- 4588 - 611 -61 043665
56.60 • I,..
033733 01/26/87 2,038.00 RETAIL DATA SYST CONT REPAIRS 50- 2010 - 000 -00 5677 V
033733 01/e6/87 _ 1, 064. 00__. - RETAIL DATA _ SYST - ------ -__ CONT_REPAIRS -_ __ - -50- 2010_- 000 - 00_5676
033733 01/26/67 1,551.00 RETAIL DATA SYST CONT REPAIRS 50 -2010- 000 -00 5678
4,653.00 • ;,
633734 01/26/87 550.00 TNT RADIO SALES INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-520 -52 14393
550.00 •
r 033735 01/26/87 484.50 * USMC REPAIR PARTS 10 -2010- 000 -00 30275 - !`,
7.
033736 01/26/87 474.60 J B CONTROLS INC REPAIR PARTS• 10 -2010- 000 -00 5010 ,
033736 01/26/87 338.51 J B CONTROLS INC REPAIR PARTS` 10 -2010- 000 -00 5011
813.11 w
033737 01/26/87 350.00 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52
033737_______01/26/87 50.50 - CRESCENT EL_EC_TRIC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80
400.50 +
033738 01/26/87 _ -- 40..00_ - -__MN MUNICIPAL LTG 50- 4202 - 620 -82.
033738 01/26/87 40.00 MN MUNICIPAL LIG CONFERENCE 50- 4202-840 -84
033738 01/26/87 40.00 MN MUNICIPAL LIG CONFERENCE 50 -4202- 840 -84
120.00
033739 01/26/87 135.00 MILE SEMINAR 10 -4202- 420 -42
135.00 • _ __ _ __ _ _
033740 - 01/26/87 - 40.00 PARK NICOLLET MED CR SERVICSES -- 10- 4201- 420 -42 I;,.
40.00 + z.
033741 01/26/87 29.00 ISIA OFFICE SUPPLIES 28- 4516 - 701 -70 0
033741 �- 01/28/87 - _ 1246 - ISIA -__ - -�
- PR_INTING 28- 4600 - 701 =T0
41.46 • - I6'I
`zl
033742 01/26/87 16_00 EARL MEI- CHSNER MEETING 10- 4202 - 482 -48 I6.
- -- 16.00 • 611
67
•' 033743- 01/26/87 16.00_ COLLEEN PAULUS _ MEETING 10= 402�4B0 -4� !z6
16.00 • 6y
7GI
033744 - 01/26/87 54.10 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600 - 611 -61 02782 721
54.10 • 71
�'51__033745 01/26/87 _ _ 880.00- FLANAGAN SALES INC_ CONST __10-145 - 0 -40 201f/- - 76
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
lbi_.06
ERIC ANDERSON '_'__
CHECK REGISTER
01/28/87
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
10-4206-430-42
VENDOR ____J.TEM_%E_$_CR.I
1!.T ION
033757
01/28/87
880.00
PEG WHITE
033746
650.00 --------STRESS
01/28/67
MGMT CONSULT
S . TRESS T - ESTS
10-4156-510-51
650.00 •
27-4504-664-66
033759
01/28/87
033747
01/26/87
60.00
TONY
HANLIN
SELF DEFENSE COURSE
033759
01/28/87
60.00
OZALID CORP
79164
033746
01/26/87
75.00
LOLA
EDMAN
SERVICES
75.00
0337496
6
2,585.00
WOOD
BEE
MENS CLUB
2,585.00
e3-4201-611-61
se
033750
0- i-/i-6/87
632.52
RT W
INC
INSURANCE
171
632.52 •
033751
/26/87
15.29
M T
SCHEUNEMAN
INSURANCE
15.29
033752
01/26/87
184.00
SNAP
ON TOOLS CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
184.00
633753
01/26/87
860.74 -FEED-RITE-CONTROL---WATER-
033753
01/26/87
1,126.94
FEED
RITE CONTROL
WATER
033753
01/26/87,
________.3,220.00- '-..---FEED
RITE - CONTROL
033753
01/26/87
1,153.65
FEED
RITE CONTROL
WATER
033753
01/26/87
789.10
FEED
RITE CONTROL
WATER
-.71-0,43
033754
01/26/87
86.51
RAFIX
EQUIP MAINT
033756
01/28/87
lbi_.06
ERIC ANDERSON '_'__
033756
01/28/87
18.90
ERIC ANDERSON
70
10-4206-430-42
033757
01/28/87
20.00
PEG WHITE
20.00 •
033758
01/28/67
37.90
DIANA HEDGES
10-4156-510-51
7
27-4504-664-66
033759
01/28/87
272.00
OZALID CORP
033759_
01/28/87
272.00-
CORP
033759
01/28/87
272.00
OZALID CORP
79164
272.00
80738
033760
01/28/87
e2.20
-fikkY KEHOE
22.20
033761 01/28/87 288.55 HENN CTY MED CENTER
288.55
SERVICES
MILEAGE
SERVICES
MEETINGS
02-02-67 PAGE 12
23-4504-613-61
BLUE PRINTING 10-2010-000-00
w_Qw a v—vvv—wv
BLUE PRINTING 10-2010-000-00
SUPPLIES
10-4504-440-44
1ST AID SUPPLY 10-4510-440-44 5062
eB
74
7,
1;,,
10-4201-140-14
70
10-4206-430-42
27-4201-66e-66
9163
27-2237-000-00
10-4260-510-51
10-4156-510-51
7
27-4504-664-66
13938
40-2010-000-00
80146
40-2010-000-00
78274
40 -201 0- 000 -00.
52730
40-2010-000-00
79164
40-4622-80S-80
80738
10-4e74-420-42
03356
*• *—CKS 47
10-4200-500-50
10-4208-500-SO
e3-4201-611-61
se
23-4504-613-61
BLUE PRINTING 10-2010-000-00
w_Qw a v—vvv—wv
BLUE PRINTING 10-2010-000-00
SUPPLIES
10-4504-440-44
1ST AID SUPPLY 10-4510-440-44 5062
eB
74
7,
• 1987 'C
1F EDINA
CHECK R TER
02 -02 -87 ;E 13
033. 762 _
01/28/87 -
2S4.72
SHARON HALE __- _
ED EQUIP
23- 4504 - 612 =61
7L-
� 033763
01/_28/_87
195._00
CHEQUE INC
SERVICES
50 -4201- 82_0 -_82
-r
,1 033763 _
_
01/28/87
195.00
CHEQUE RITE INC
SERVICES
50 -4201- 840 -84
033763
01/28/87
195.00
CHEQUE RITE INC
SERVICES
50- 4201 - 660 -86
1,150.00
r
585.00 +
na
033764
01/28/87
25.00
PAM STODDARD
CONT SERV
10 -4200- 500 -50
BOOKS
10- 450A9- _40 -14
25.00 r
I-
033765
01/28/87
42.00
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
REG
10- 4202 - 240 -24
033765
01/28/87
- - - - - - --- - - -- - --
42_00
PURDUE UNIVERSITY
REG_ - --
40= 420$- 80
------ -------
--
84.00 +
033772
01/28/87
' 033766
01/28/87
597.00
VESSCO INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80 2984
-
'_ - -_-
_,I
_
597.00 r
5.54
-
_ 033767
-
_ 01/28/87
-
600.00
H RENNER- &_ SONS
CONT REPAIRS _
40- 4248- 801-8P3_026.
600.00 +
REFUND UTILITY
40 -3525- 000 -00
i 033768
01/28/87
26.43
JANET CHANDLER
RIBBON
10- 4504 - 507 -50
_- - --
' - A777LA
- ---
A. 1fl0 /A7
26.43 r
9A7 AA
- - - --
nf%UA1 n eru Tnocn
/f%Uov
07- 4AAft- !!d -!! !77!
a
J
I]
I4 I
19 -
16
Iv
19� -
3, 1,
3i
13 I
]d
207.00
+
37
JCI
«,I
033770
01/28/87
1,150_00
CAMPBELL CONSULTANTS
REPLACEMENT
10- 4901 - 140 -14 011267
- - -
- --
-
1,150.00
r
na
" _
033771 -_
- - --
01/28/87 _ -_-
- -- --
178_44
_
LEARNING INTER
BOOKS
10- 450A9- _40 -14
idd
I-
178.44
+
45
66
9 71
033772
01/28/87
S.54
THOMAS SKJARET
REFUND UTILITY
40 -3525- 000 -00
dr!
„' -
- - -- -
5.54
r
I49
033773
01/28/87
1ST BANK MINNEAPOLIS
REFUND UTILITY
40 -3525- 000 -00
_11.61
11.61
r3
033774
01/28/87
65.00
ERIC FELTON
ENTRY FEE
10 -2149- 000 -00
3B
65.00
r
- -�
157
''r-,i
033775
01/28/87
95.00
ICMA
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
159
60
--
--
-- - - -- --
9s.00
6.
033776
01/28/87
39.00
WORKING SMART
BOOKS
10 -4502- 140 -14
1112�
64
39.00
+
I65
67
033778
01/28/87
3,100.00
IMPULSE CONCEPTS INC
10 -2010- 000 -00
71
3 100.00
r
�2
.1
_
_
73
�7I033779
01/28/67
230.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 506 -50
75
7
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -02 -87 PACE 14
X41
v
d
r
4
4
oo�mw .vo rvnu ov ,v,nL. uunainuuiaun rvnu
230.00 •
I4l
- --- -- - - - -
443, 328.5- --- _, —;
-- -- - - - - -- - - —
>5I
APPR D ' :; i „YMU4T.
4n
7cl
371
47
nn
44
033780
01/28/87
11085.00
CWDC INDUSTRIES INC
LUMBER
10- 4604- 260 -26
482567
J
99
9G
1,085.00 •
90
50
I4`
117
el
®]
GJ
64
.0'
" I
69
68
67
so
92
94
69
70
71
77
99
9G
P7
a
033Th8,
01/28/87
4,000.00
IitPULSE CONCEPTS INC.
CONST
10- 2010-000 -00
15016
-I
033781
-- ----- --- ----- -
01/28/87
--- -_ .. _._..-- -- --- - ---
25,740.00
-__ _,Q8 -- 8.4.8..-_-68•x! ----
INSITYFORM CENTRAL
-- -- -. _..._.. _._._..�._ ... _ .-
CONT REPAIRS
..___.._�-- -- --
40- 4248 - 800 -80
020
"�
033782
01/28/87
44.00
BARR ENGINEERING CO
SERVICSES
10- 4201 - 260 -26
44.00 •
033783
01/28/87
728.48
DONOHUE ENG 6 ARCH
SERVICES
40- 4201 - 600 -80
728.48 •
"
033784
01/28/87
2,672.75
BRW
CONST
60 -2010- 000 -00
43484
— 2-`672_75 •
--
033785
01/28/87
3,347.58
TKDA
SERVICES
40 -2010- 000 -00
865101
- - -
- -- - - - - -
-- ------- - -- -
-- 3347 .58-- �---------------
•- - - - -- -- - -
- - -- —
- - - - - -- - -...
• * * -CKS
tz=l
163,.05] -92
X02.
FUND --1 O_TOTAL—
GENE -RAL, IINQ
"j
27.10
FUND 20 TOTAL
440.12
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
FUND. 27 _TOTAL..., -- -- _
GOLF- COURSE- FUND __ —__
— CompuC�r_sh.�sk�Ji_'fl16Ql�thru _-
449.62
FUND 28 TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
76165
260,767.81
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
_
6,164_83
FUND _50 TOTAL_
LI- OUOR_DISPENSARY__YUND
X41
v
d
r
4
4
oo�mw .vo rvnu ov ,v,nL. uunainuuiaun rvnu
"I
I4l
- --- -- - - - -
443, 328.5- --- _, —;
-- -- - - - - -- - - —
>5I
APPR D ' :; i „YMU4T.
4n
7cl
371
47
nn
44
90
139
-
97
4.
4 ,
99
9G
`4
90
50
I4`
117
el
®]
GJ
64
.0'
" I
69
68
67
so
92
94
69
70
71
77
99
9G
P7
73
74
79
9