HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MARCH 16, 1987
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
MINUTES of HRA Meeting of March 2, 1987 approved as submitted or corrected by
motion of , seconded by
I. AWARD OF BID - Demolition and Removal of Buildings (Coritd from 3/2/87)
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FLAG CEREMONY -= friendly Bluebirds - Countryside School (Camp Fire)
PROCLAMATION - Camp Fire Birthday Week
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - Bower Hawthorne
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II.
III.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular-Meetings of February 23 and March 2, 1987
and Amendment of MINUTES of August 4, 1986
PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation
hearing. If
vote to pass
by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/4 favorable rollcall
if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter
Improvement No. BA -264 - West 50th Street from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue
(Contd from 3/2/87)
B. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -37
Vernon Avenue from Interlachen Blvd to Villa Way
C. Traffic Signal Improvement No. 87 -5
Link Road and Vernon Avenue
D. Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter
Improvement No. P -BA -278 — Link Road from Eden Avenue to Vernon Avenue
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of the 'Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats,
Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final
Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of
all members of the Council required to pass.
A. Preliminary Plat ADDroval
1. Lot 5, Muir Woods - Robert Griffith - Generally located north of Braemar
Blvd and east & west of Valley View Rd (Contd from 3 /2 /87- Coritinue:to 4/20/87)
2. John Laurent and Associates - Generally located north of West 78th Street
and east of Marth Road
3. DCI Second Addition - Generally located south of Waterman Avenue and
east of Blake Road
1�
Agenda
Edina City Council - 3/16/87
Page Two
IV.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS (CONTD)
21
B.
Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Shadow Hill Townhomes - Generally
- Strategic Planning
8:00
located north of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Court
Braemar
C.
Final Development Plan - Midwest Federal Building Expansion - Located at
Apr
6
3100 West 66th Street
Council
D.
CDBG Program Budget for Year XIII (1987)
V.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI.
AWARD OF BIDS
*
A.
(2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Remodeling (Contd from 312187)
*
B.
Traffic Paint
p.m.
C.
Reconstruction of 1977 Ford General LS9000 Pumper
VII.
RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
28
A.
Vierkant's Composting Proposal for Morningside
*
B.
Approval of 32 Beer License Renewals
Clubhouse
C.
Temporary 3.2 Beer License - Our Lady of Grace Church
4
D.
Agenda - Strategic Planning Retreat - March 21
Meeting
E.
I -494 Corridor Study Time Extention Request
Council
F.
Report on Deer
May
G.
Appointment to Recycling Commission
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Report
B. City Hall Space Study
C. East Edina Housing Foundation Candidate
D. Joint Meeting of Council /School Board
X. FINANCE
A. Re- funding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds
* B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 3116187: General Fund $490,248.82,
Art Center $2,410.56, Capital Fund $4,987.50, Swimming Pool Fund $562.00,
Golf Course Fund $8,671.34, Recreation Center Fund $4,295.66, Gun Range
Fund $287.11, Utility Fund $13,353.56, Liquor Dispensary Fund $54,657.60,
Total $579,474.15; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims
dated 2128187: General Fund $804,673.35, Art Center $186.42, Golf Course
Fund $321.55, Recreation Center Fund $207.23, Gun Range Fund $66.38., Utility
Fund $516.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $188,574.37, Total $994.546.25
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Sat
Mar
21
Council
Retreat
- Strategic Planning
8:00
a.m.
Braemar
Clubhouse
Mon
Apr
6
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
Apr
20
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Tues
Apr
28
VOLUNTEERS
RECOGNITION
5:00
p.m.
Braemar
Clubhouse
Mon
May
4
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
May
11
Board of
Review
5:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
May
18
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council.Room
I
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MARCH 2, 1987
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and
Courtney.
MINUTES of the H.R.A. Meeting of February 23, 1987 were approved as submitted
by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BID FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS CONTINUED TO MARCH 16.
As recommended by Manager Rosland, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded
by Commissioner Turner to continue the award of bid for demolition and
removal of buildings to the meeting of March 16, 1987.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned
by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Motion carried.
Executive Director
REOUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Housing & Redevelopment.Authority of Edina
FROM: Gordon Hughes, Executive Director H.R.A.
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: February 26, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications): Contract #87 -5 (ENG)
Building Demolition & Removal
5106 & 5120 Brookside Avenue
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Neisen Tiling
2.. Holst Construction
3. Kennedy Excavating
4. Doty & Sons
5. Veit Co.
6. Carl Bolander & Sons
7. Elcon Construction
Department Recommendation:
Neisen Tiling
HRA 1
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$28,892.00
$34,150.00
$35,448.00
.$40,369.13
$46,000.00
$49,825.00
$26,700.00
H.R.A.
Signature J Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid & - is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
LA)
John Wallin, Finance Director
City Manager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
_;
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 23, 1987
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor
Courtney.
RESERVE POLICE OFFICERS AND EXPLORER POST 925 COMMENDED. Chief Craig Swanson
introduced the Edina Police Explorer Post 925 members, noting that 14 of the 22
Explorers were in attendance. During the fall of 1986, the Explorers partici-
pated in a community crime prevention project by checking every house in the
City for properly displayed house numbers. Approximately 150 residents were
contacted concerning their need for numbers. The Explorers also installed numbers
on the houses of those requesting assistance. Clearly visible house numbers
are extremely - important during an emergency situation. The City of Edina commends
the Edina Police Explorers for their outstanding contribution in the area of
crime prevention and community service. Chief Swanson also introduced 7 of the
15 Edina Police Reserve Officers who were present and commended all of the
Reserves for their outstanding and dedicated community service. Special recogni-
tion was given to: Loren Hallonquist for 10 years of service and Scott Johnson for
13 years of service. Robert Moreland was recognized for distinguished and meri-
torious service on November 3, 1986. On that date while at his place of employ-
ment at Hennepin County Medical Center he responded to a female employee's
cries for help who had been assaulted with a knife. After giving assistance,
he gave chase and apprehended the suspect. The Council Members expressed their
thanks and appreciation to the Explorers and Reserve Officers.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by
Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney.
Motion carried.
*COUNCIL MINUTES OF JANUARY 26 AND FEBRUARY 2, 1987 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF
JANUARY 12 AND FEBRUARY 2, 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Kelly,
seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of
January 26 and February 2 and the Special Meetings of January 12 and February 2,
1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL TABLED.
Manager Rosland stated that Fairview Southdale Hospital staff are planning on
taking their Final Development Plan back to the Community Development and Plan-
ning Commission for hearing and tabling of the hearing is recommended. Motion
of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to table the matter of the Final
Development Plan for Fairview Southdale Hospital.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA. (Member' Turner
stated that because she and her husband were active members of Colonial Church
and have been involved in the church's expansion planning that she would not
participate in the hearing on the Conditional Use Permit and left the meeting.)
Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered place on file.
Phil Dommer, Planner, presented the request of Colonial Church of Edina,'generally
located north of the Crosstown Highway and west of Tracy Avenue, for a Conditional
Use Permit. The permit would allow a major expansion of the church facility for
educational activities, a multi - purpose gymnasium area and a media center.
The church requests permission to add approximately 37,000 square feet of building
to the site and an additional 146 parking stalls. The proposed addition will for
the most part lie to the south of the existing building with a small addition to
the west. Additional parking will be located primarily on the southeasterly portion
of the site. Mr. Dommer pointed out that one of the most favorable features will
be the addition of a southerly entrance. It is hoped that the new entrance will
make the new parking area more accessible to the members of the church and that
on- street parking will be decreased. The request was heard by the Community Deve-
lopment and Planning Commission on January 7, 1987 and the item was continued to
allow time for a traffic analysis and parking study to be done as well review by
the Nine.Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (DNR). The large pond located on the church site is subject to a DNR
permit. The project is also subject to a permit by the Nine Mile Watershed District.
At that time, Colonial Church retained Benshoof and Associates to conduct the
traffic study. Some of the recommendations of the study involved sight line
distances, additional signage and traffic control for special events. Upon receiv-
ing satisfactory evidence that the appropriate permits were to be granted by the
Watershed District and the DNR, the Planning Commission again reviewed the pro-
2/23/87
posal on January 28, 1987. The Commission recommended approval of the Condi-
tional Use Permit subject to the following: 1) That the church enter into a
proof of parking agreement consisting of a fixed annual review, and 2) Receipt
of the DNR permit. Since that time, a revised site plan has been submitted
which the Commission did not review. Mr. Dommer presented graphics of the
new site plan pointing out that the basic change has been the combination of
parking areas with some alteration of the ponding area. The site plan was
changed in response to recommendations and conditions imposed by the DNR.
Mr. Dommer said that parking for the site meets Ordinance standards. Colonial
Church estimates a maximum seating capacity in the largest area of 950 people.
By the Ordinance standards that would require 317 parking stalls and the site
plan provides approximately 675 parking stalls. Larry Laukka, chairman of the
Colonial Church building committee, was present to represent the church. Also
present were James Benshoof of Benshoof and Associates, Inc. and James Goulet,
civil engineer, who worked on the original development of Colonial Church as
well as the expansion plan. Mr. Laukka explained that the primary purpose
for expanding the.facility was to meet the needs that the church examined and
identified.back in the 1970's when the church was located on Wooddale Avenue.
It was anticipated then that to answer the long term needs the church would
need in excess of 80,000 square feet of space. The facility was designed to
accommodate all of those future uses.-but because of lack of funds the plan was
scaled back to the existing facility of approximately 43,000 square feet. He
said the church is now expanding into counseling services which exceeds the
present capacity of the facility and there is also a need for additional space
for educational purposes and storage area. Seating in the santuary will be
increased to a maximum. of 1170 people if a ratio of 18 inches per person is
used. Mr. Laukka said they have also addressed the question of traffic and
need for additional parking. The expansion plan revises the north parking
lot to increase the parking capacity there and essentially doubles the size
of the south parking lot. The key to the development plan is that essentially
the church has been oriented towards the north. Traffic has come from the
north and from.the south and some overflow parking on Olinger has resulted.
Mr. Laukka said that to address that problem, a south entrance to the building
is proposed and the way the building will be used in its expansion mode will
encourage parking on the southerly lot. To accomplish this the pond will
have to be modified and a bridge will be constructed so that people can
access the facility from the south parking lot. Mr. Laukka then gave a brief
slide presentation illustrating the proposed expansion in scale model form
from all sides of the site, pointing out the expansion details. He noted
that concerns have been raised as to: 1) the ability to retain storm water
on the site, and 2) parking and traffic management. In.working with both
the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the DNR, the ponding area has
been reworked so that the site will retain the same amount of storm water as
it was required to retain in 1976 when the church was built and the island
will remain as a habitat for ducks and geese. The issue of parking and
traffic has been addressed. Parking has been analyzed on a number of occasions
last Fall using typical. Sundays and Thursdays when the church has peak
activity. Management of parking on the site was evaluated and a draft proposal
has been developed for annual reviewal. Parking will be retained as best
the church.can on the site and on Colonial Way, refraining from parking on
Olinger Boulevard or Tracy Avenue, and attempting to relieve traffic con -
gestion on the ramp at Tracy coming from the Crosstown. Parking could be
expanded on the site if needed at some future time. Bill Johnson, 5816
Olinger Boulevard, presented a document signed by residents of the area.
He said the issue of the residents was not the validity, need, extent or
nature of the church expansion but the issue is parking and traffic manage-
ment, proper procedure in filing for permits, and whether the Planning
Commission followed legal procedure in the hearing process. Attorney Tom
Erickson said that this had been brought to his attention and it was his
understanding that the Planning Commission did have two conditions for
further consideration of the matter; that subsequently the Planner did
bring the matter back to the Commission with the statement that he had been
advised that a DNR permit was ready to be issued and that the traffic con-
sultant had made their report. On the basis of that statement the Commission
voted to rehear the matter. Mr. Erickson opined that, based on these facts,
that the Planning Commission did properly hear the matter. They imposed the
conditions and by subsequent vote after report of the Planner they decided
to hear the matter. Mr. Johnson then presented the issues raised in the
document as follows: 1) communications, 2) validity of traffic studies,
3) plans to improve traffic and flow control, 4) neighborhood relations
between the church and residents, 5) .traffic control in case of emergency,
6) watershed district issues, 7) damage to property because of pile driving
and 8) future expansion of church. Response by representatives of Colonial
Church was as follows. Skip Goodmundson, Administrator, said that the
invitation to the first meeting held by the church was sent to the same
mailing list as the City sent notice of public hearing, which list was up-
_4
2 -23 -87
dated by the secretary of Nine Mile Village Association. For those not able
to attend, they were invited to stop at the church for information on the
proposed expansion. Mr. Benshoof stated that they performed a detailed park-
ing and traffic analysis to address the questions raised and that although
traffic counts were taken on only two Sundays, they did not rely solely on those
counts but reviewed attendance data for the church for a full year to see how
it fluctuated and adjusted the results of the parking counts to represent the
85th percentile highest event day and concluded the maximun need for parking
is 494 parking stalls. With regard to the difficulty of getting out of the
driveways for residents on Olinger Boulevard, Mr. Benshoof said a suggest-
ion was made at the Planning Commission meeting that the City consider the
installation of guide sign on Tracy Avenue to direct church traffic to use
Colonial Way. About traffic delays at Tracy /Crosstown, the study found there
are indeed some traffic delays but that they generally are within normal
limits and not excessive. Special off -duty police patrol is provided by the
church at.peak times. The study made two suggestions: 1) that the sight distance
be improved at the northwest corner of the intersection of Tracy /Crosstown, and
2),that additional street lighting be added to the intersection to improve
nighttime visibility. Mr. Goulet stated that the changes in the site plan
were in response to conditions imposed by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District
for issuance of the DNR permit. Prior to actual construction, the plan will
be re- submitted to the Watershed District for final review. The basic require-
ment is storage of storm water, i.e. volume and area. With regard to the concern
of damage from pile driving, Mr. Goulet said the process has certain limitations
imposed on it in terms of acceleration and frequency and those standards were
developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines and represent threshold values of cosmetic
damage. For this project that will include an inventory of the structures that
might be affected prior to start of construction (visual observation and photos)
and seismic data that would occur during construction would be recorded. After
construction is completed those same structures would be viewed once again to see
if there is any damage. Mr. Laukka said that the residents of Nine Mile Village
have been told by the church that pile driving is noisy, it does shake the earth
and that to protect the church and the neighbors their properties will be photo-
graphed prior to construction and then following construction and that the
church will respond if there are any problems. Noise will be regulated in terms
of starting and stopping each day and by specifications in the contract. As to
future expansion of the church facility, Mr. Laukka said they are essentially
prepared to sign off at this point on the main structure; that they have
maximized the impact the facility can make on the site and the impact it can
make witha.:n the Watershed District. He pointed out_ that there is a process
for further additions to the site if that is proposed at some future time. Dale
Stroud, resident and board member of Nine Mile Village, stated they have had good
cooperation from the church representatives at various meetings; are not concerned
but have asked for a letter concerning liability; and are generally supportive of
the project. Carol Rothe, 6105 Arbour Lane, said she was more concerned about
traffic resulting from activities at Countryside Park than that generated by
the church and that there was much positive attitude in the area regarding the
church. Bruce Botten, 6248 Sandpiper Court, said he and his mother live in the
building closest to the church and that the building has constructural problems.
His mother bought the property in November of 1985 and it has a history of ground
water and foundation problems dating back to when the church was first built.
Footings and the foundation are in a state of constant movement. He said they
were concerned that the pilings for the church will affect expansion of the sub-
soil and ground water. His mother has requested that the church provide insurance
to cover structural losses that may occur and she also requested that the church
provide.funds for her to hire a consulting engineer to protect her. She also
requests that the church provide insurance to cover any physical losses of
possessions within the interior of her townhouse as a result of the driving of
pilings for construction. She also requested that pilings be driven only during
normal daylight hours. Mr. Botten concluded that they have no problem with the
church expansion, that the church is a good neighbor and they are only concerned
about the short and long time effect to their building and the damage that may
occur as a result of the construction. In response Mr. Laukka said that basically
the church's position is that they want to be sure that the construction activity
does not do any damage. If it does, it is the church's responsibility. He --
reiterated that the church would be sure the contractors and subcontractors would
have the necessary specifications and standards, that seismic monitoring points
will be placed between the church and Nine Mile Village, and that the church has
been advised that there will be no damage to any property, but if it should
occur the church will take care of it. Speaking in support of the project were
t
Ruth Miller, 6330 Red Fox Lane and Wal Miller, 6201 Tracy Avenue. Mr. Miller
suggested that a traffic light at Tracy and the Crosstown would alleviate some
of the traffic problems. Member Richards asked for a clarification of the parking
agreement. Mr. Dommer explained that this is unusual for church property and
that the intent is that, though we recognize that they have exceeded Ordinance
requirements for parking, should there be a problem based on residents' concerr_,
2/23/87
by entering into the agreement the church would provide additional parking
or additional measures to control traffic. Mr. Laukka commented that the
church offered to enter into the agreement as they feel it is in their
best interests to manage the traffic on the site. Member Richards then
asked about the = -recommendation to improve ingress and egress from Colonial
Way. Mr. Laukka explained that the traffic consultant has suggested that
the three mature pine trees which block the vision to the north for west-
bound vehicles on the Crosstown which are exiting onto Tracy be removed. The
trees are located on City property and should be considered for removal. The
other issue is installation of a guide sign on the corner of Colonial Way
and Tracy which would be located on park property to identify the route to
Colonial Church. Member Richards suggested this be handled through the
Traffic Safety Committee and that the church be responsible for any costs
incurred in'carrying out the recommendations to which Mr. Laukka agreed.
Member Smith commented that a traffic signal at Tracy and the Crosstown
would come under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. Engineer Hoffman
pointed out that presently there are no warrants for a traffic signal. In
response to Member Smith, Mr. Hoffman said that there is no precedent for
posting of a private sign on public lands. Member Richards then commented
in support of the project that when the church acquired the property we
recognized the size of the site and that it is an appropriate use of the
site; that there are no variances requested; that the parking agreement
will address future concerns as to parking and traffic control; that the
appropriate permit must be in place before construction can begin; and the
concerns expressed regarding structural damage will be a private matter
between the church and property owners. Member Richards then introduced
the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to execution of
the proof of parking agreement by Colonial Church and receipt of the DNR
permit:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance
No. 825 have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a
Conditional Use Permit to Colonial Church of Edina for building expansion.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Courtney
ResoY,htion adopted.
(Member Turner returned to the meeting at this point on the agenda.)
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Dommer
presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for Warden Acres Dahle
Replat generally located south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue.- The
property is currently developed with two single family lots containing approx-
imately 52,000 square feet. He recalled that similar proposals for the property
were-heard by the Council on May 19 and September 15, 1986. On those occasions
two single family lots were proposed with lot widths of 72.8 feet each. The
Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet so both were sub -
standard lots. Both of those proposals identified the southerly area.of the
parcel as outlots. Mr. Dommer advised that the proponent has returned with a
new.;.modified proposal for the property. Lot 1, Warden Acres, Peterson Replat
(Lot 3, directly to the east) has been added to the plat. This lot has approxi-
mately 101 feet of frontage on Garden Avenue and 120 feet of depth along Grove
Street. The proposed plat takes 4.4 feet-of the depth of this lot and adds it
to the width of Lots 1 and 2 of the proposed plat. Lot 3 then becomes non -
conforming since it no longer provides the required depth of 120 feet. All
three lots conform to all other Ordinance requirements. The southerly portion
of the property would be platted an an unbuildable outlot as in previous proposals.
This matter was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on
January 28, 1987, and noting the elimination of setting an undesirable precedent
by granting approval to two substandard lots, Lots 1 and 2 would now be conforming,
and noting that there would be additional spacing between dwellings they
recommended approval of the preliminary plat with these conditions: 1) Sub-
division dedication fee and 2) payment of utility connection charges. Member
Kelly asked if approval would allow Oak Lane to be extended at some time in
the future. Mr. Dommer replied that it does not prohibit or encourage the
extention of Oak Lane, except that the extention would permit development of
two additional lots. Member Richards raised the question of the one year
restriction before this matter could be brought back for hearing.. Attorney
Erickson explained that the one year restriction following denial applies only
to rezoning requests and does not apply to platting. Member Turner asked if
there are any existing lots in this neighborhood which are substandard as to
2/23/87
depth. Mr. Dommer responded that within the general area there are no sub-
standard lots. Tory Dahle, the proponent, commented that at the previous meet-
ing it was suggested that perhaps a neighbor would be willing to sell some land
to be added to the proposed plat to bring the lot widths up to Ordinance
requirements. Mr. Dahle said that he has contacted the owner of Lot 3 and he
has agreed to sell approximately 4 feet which would address the concern raised by
the Council with regard to setting a precedent by approving substandard lots.
James Peterson, owner of the subject Lot 3, said he has agreed to sell 4 feet of
his property to Mr. Dahle. Mr. Peterson recalled that about six years ago he
had addressed the Council with regard to a subdivision he was proposing in con-
junction with his neighbor across the street which is now Garden Avenue. The
neighborhood at that time was composed of four older homes which were deteriorat-
ing, many acres of land and a dirt street. Unfortunately, Mr. Peterson said they
could not develop the entire neighborhood and developed only those parcels they
owned. There are now ten new homes and a new street and three of the four older
homes have been rehabilitated. He said that the plat proposed by Mr. Dahle is
the means for rehabilitating the remaining older home. The problem is that the
lot sizes originally laid out are too big, and yet when subdivided are too small
and it has created a conflict as how to properly use the land. Mr. Peterson
stated that the proposed plat is the proper use of the land and will afford
proper use for the third section of development in due course along the proposed
Oak Lane. With regard to the reduced lot depth of his lot, Mr. Peterson said it
is a large lot and the four feet to be sold is excessive driveway width and he
felt it would not have a negative effect on the neighborhood. There being no
further comment, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved
adoption, subject to 1) payment of a subdivision fee and 2) payment of utility
connection charges:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR
WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Dahle Replat ", platted by Dahle Brothers,
Inc., and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 23,
1987, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Mayor Courtney.
Member Turner commented that she could not support the request because a sub-
standard lot will be created, there is no hardship which would justify approval,
and that denial of the plat here will not prevent ultimate replatting of the lots
north of Benton Avenue. Following further discussion, Mayor Courtney called for
the rollcall vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Courtney
Nays: Richards, Turner
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH) CONTINUED TO
3/2/87. As recommended, motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith to
contiaue the public hearing on the preliminary plat for Lot 5, Muir Woods to
the meeting of March 2, 1987.
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPROVED. Motion was made by Member
Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to approve the appointment of Eugene Davis as
Assistant Weed Inspector for the year 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS AND COUNCIL LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS
CONTINUED TO 3/2/87. Because of the large number of candidates interviewed by the
Council for openings on advisory boards and commissions, the Council Members
informally agreed to continue the matter of appointments as well as Council
liaison assignments to the meeting of March 2, 1987.
REPORT GIVEN ON ARNESON ACRES PARK AGREEMENT. Manager Rosland recalled that the
Edina Park Board had made.a study as to a permanent home for the Edina Historical
Society. That study recommended that the Arneson home in Arneson Acres Park be
considered which led to conversations with the Edina Garden Council which presently
is working out of the Park. Over the past months a master plan has been developed
for Arneson Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of
the facility by the Garden Council and the Historical Society. The Park Board has
approved the Arneson Acres Park Master.-,Plan in concept, the preliminary agreement
between the Garden Council and the Historical Society and the Arneson Acres Museum
Plans in concept and are recommending approval by the Council. Robert Kojetin,
Park Director, advised that Jim Robin, architect, was hired to develop the master
plan design for Arneson Acres Park. He then showed graphics of the master plan for
the Park and pointed out.the main areas including the Arneson home, the lake area,
2/23/87
the formal garden area (which had been designed in concept by Mr. Arneson),
the forested area, the parking area and the path system through the Park.
He noted that these areas are designed in concept only now and the plan -will
need to.be refined as the Park is developed. Mr. Kojetin said that the mainte-
nance building - -needs repair and that the City's capital budget has scheduled
money two years from now to upgrade the building. He introduced Foster
Dunwiddie of Miller Dunwiddie Associates who has prepared plans for the renova-
tion of the Arneson home. Mr. Dunwiddie said that he has been meeting with
the Garden Council and the Historical Society over several months to reflect in
the design of the house the needs of both groups. He presented graphics showing
the orientation of the house to the immediate grounds surrounding it and then
showed floor plans for the terrace level to be used by the Garden Council and
the first floor level to be used by the Historical Society. The renovation and
expansion of the Arneson House is proposed to be done in two phases. Phase I
improvements to the house would make a number of changes on both the terrace
level and the first floor level which were explained in detail. Phase 2 of the
project provides for an expansion of the house to the northeast. The first floor
of the expansion would include an.office /reception area, exhibit space, and an
entry lobby. The lower level would include collection storage and restrooms.
Mr. Dunwiddie concluded his presentation by stating that it is felt this would be
an appropriate use of the facility. Mr. Rosland said that the Garden Council and
the Historical Society have drafted an agreement to be executed with the City
which defines usage by each group under the Phase I construction, user fees
and building operations. When Phase II is completed the agreement provides for
joint use of the living room /library on the first floor level. The agreement
also provides for a scheduling plan for the facility. As to funding, Mr. Rosland
submitted that Phase I is estimated at $35,000 and staff would recommend that
money come from the Developer's Fund. Phase II has been targeted as a goal of
the 1988 Edina Centennial to raise $250,000 and the Centennial Commission is
ready to proceed with that challange upon Council approval. Mr. Rosland pointed
out that Phase I would also require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit
which would have to go through the normal hearing process of the Council. In
summary, Mr. Rosland recommended for Council approval: 1) concept approval of
the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan and the Historical Society /Garden Council
building renovation and expansion, 2) expenditure of $35,000 for Phase I, and
3) Conditional Use Permit process. Member Smith then made a motion for concept
approval of the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan and the Historical Society /Garden
Council building and to proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner. Member Richards commented that all the issues
should -.be discussed first. He said at the Park._Board meeting a question was
raised about using money from the Developer's Fund for the Arneson house
renovation and how much should be spent. This is the first time the Council
has seen the park master plan and the renovations plans and he felt the Council
should fully understand all the issues and how the two organizations would be
impacted by these decisions. Jim Fenlason, president of the Historical Society,
said that they have had many meetings with the Garden Council on the shared
use of the building and the format for the usage considerations have been basically
agreed on by both groups. He said that.the Society is excited about the
prospect of a permanent home and hope to get back in business this summer to
prepare for the 1988 Edina Centennial. Then they would hope to move on with
Phase II with the funds raised during the Centennial. Mr. Fenlason said the
Society has some limited funds they could use for Phase I but nothing close to
the total cost. Bev Harris, president of the Garden Council, said they were
very excited about the plan and had no disagreement with Phase I. All nine
garden clubs have agreed to work with the Historical Society. Phase I calls
for the removal of the stairs between the two levels and the clubs like that
separation of the two areas. In response to Member Smith, Mr. Rosland
explained the Conditional Use Permit process and timetable which indicated
that the public hearing on the permit could be on the Council's agenda on
April 20. Member Smith said that the intent of his motion was to go that far
before looking at funding. Member Turner raised the question of the operating
costs for the Park and if the City can afford this within the annual budget
for the Park Department. Mr. Rosland clarified that the two groups would pay
for the utilities and would maintain the interior of the building. The City
would maintain the exterior as in the past. Member Richards said the Council -
would be making some major decisions and that they needed the full opportunity
to digest and discuss this and to understand all the financial obligations.
Member Kelly said she supported the plan concent; that it was developed out
of a philosophical condition of the Park Board who approved the plan, and that
the two organizations have worked very hard on this. After further discussion,
Mr. Rosland said he would have staff prepare additional information to answer
the questions and issues that have been raised and would bring that back to
the Council on March 2, 1987. Member Smith then withdrew his motion and Member
Turner withdrew her second. No formal action was taken.
2/23/87
TEMPORARY CLOSING OF WEST 50TH STREET FOR EDINA ART FAIR APPROVED. Manager Rosland
advised that a request has been received from the 50th and France Business and
Professional Association to close West 50th Street to vehicular traffic from
Halifax Avenue to France Avenue during the Edina Art Fair. Mark Zierden, repre-
sentative for the 50th and France Business & Professional Association, said that
the request would be for Saturday, June 6 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday,
June 7 from noon to 5 p.m. The purpose is two -fold: 1) to create overall safety
for the Art Fair by means of a controlled area for pedestrians free of the hazards
of motorized traffic, and 2) to create a more festive atmosphere enchancing the
overall appearance of the Art Fair. Mr. Zierden said their main concern is
safety for pedestrians and that no stands or permanent objects would be placed in
the street itself for any performers. As to re- routing MTC buses, Mr. Zierden
said the Association would be responsible for making these arrangements and that
he had contacted the MTC and they indicated they could re -route for those times.
Mr. Rosland pointed out that if approved the Police Department recommended
the following restrictions: 1) Closure be permitted only on Saturday, June 6
from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday, June 7 from noon to 5 p.m., 2) that artists
be required to set up on sidewalks, leaving the street to pedestrian traffic
and that no staging or structure be placed in the street, and 3) that the Association
would be responsible for making arrangements with the MTC. Motion was made by
Member Smith to approve the temporary closing of West 50th Street during the Edina
Art Fair as requested and subject to the restrictions recommended by the Police
Department. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY (BRAEMAR HILLS 11TH ADDITION).
Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minne-
sota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined, after receipt of the petition of the owners
of land affected thereby that the following described easements for street, drainage
and utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
Right of way and drainage and utility easements on and adjacent to Lots 4
and 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition.
That part of Marth Court lying West of the northerly extension of the
East line of said Lot 4,
Also that part of the adjacent drainage and utility easement lying West
of a line 10 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Lot 4,
and its northerly extensions.
Subject to proposed drainage and utility easements over;
The East 10 feet of the above described vacated Marth Court,
Also that part lying 5 feet on either side of the South line of said
Lot 5 and its easterly extension.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, as least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in.at least three (3) public and con-
spicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON- VACATION
EASEMENTS FOR STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA -
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on April 6, 1987,
at 7 o'clock p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed
vacation of the following easements for street, drainage and utility purposes:
(Legal description as included in paragraph 1. of this resolution)
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be
heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which
such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed
vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person,
2/23/87
corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone
poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants
on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the
same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to
maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the
purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which
any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BOARD /COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESS DISCUSSED. Member Smith asked how the
board and commission appointments would be handled at the next meeting. After
discussion it was.informally agreed that the Council members would submit their
nominations to the Clerk for inclusion in next week's packets.
I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT NOTED. Member Turner advised that an interim
report has been placed in the Council packets on the I -494 Corridor Study in
response to Member Smith's request for more background information. She asked
that the matter of the study be placed on the Council Agenda for March 2.
AMM FISCAL DISPARITIES STUDY DISCUSSED. Member Turner recalled that at the
AMM membership meeting last Fall, that the membership voted to send the issue
of Fiscal Disparities back to the committee for re- study. The committee has
developed a compromise position on Fiscal Disparities which has been approved
by the Board and is coming back to the membership at a special meeting on
March 12. She thanked Member Kelly and John Wallin for their work on the committee.
BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION DISCUSSED. Member Richards said that at the
Edina Park Board meeting on February 17, 1987, a presentation was made by Ed
Howat who is coordinating the efforts to expand the Braemar Sports Complex.
The suggestion was made and the Park Board concurred to form a committee
comprised of individuals from the Sports Committee, the Park Board, City staff
and the Council to meet and discuss the options and alternatives for funding
if the project is to go forward. One of the suggestions made is that the City
consider selling general obligation bonds to finance the cost of the improve-
ment which is estimated at $4 Million. Member Richards said he was asked to
bring this to the Council to see if they would like to participate in such
a committee. Following some discussion, Member Smith made a motion that Member
Richards and one other Council Member, to be appointed by the Mayor, be Council
representatives on the committee to be formed to discuss the Braemar Sports
Complex. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner
Nays: Kelly, Courtney
Motion carried.
COUNCIL REMINDED OF EDINAMITE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 28. Manager Rosland
reminded the Council of EDINAMITE '87 which is scheduled for Saturday,
February 28 and said that tickets were still available and urged their support.
MANAGER EXPRESSES THANKS FOR VACATION. Manager Rosland expressed his thanks
and appreciation for his recent vacation.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 2/23/87: General
Fund $196,653.60, Art Center $3,305.92, Capital Fund $3,366.16, Swimming Pool
Fund $49.94, Golf Center Fund $6,807.47, Recreation Center Fund $18,562.77,
Gun Range Fund $181.04, Utility Fund $25,382.80, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$90,091.78, Construction Fund $393.35, Total $344,794.83; and for confirmation
of payment of claims dated 1/31/87: General Fund $613,784.70, Art Center $140.77,
Swimming Pool Fund $49.80, Golf Course Fund $715.39, Recreation Center Fund
$346.60, Gun Range Fund $40.12, Utility Fund $378.09, Liquor Dispensary Fund
$185,180.03, Total $800,635.50.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda Mayor Courtney adjourned
the meeting at 10:20 p.m.
City Clerk
11
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 2, 1987
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, and Mayor
Courtney. �—
FLAG CEREMONY CONDUCTED BY GIRL SCOUTS; GIRL SCOUT WEEK PROCLAIMED. The meeting
was opened by the presentation of the colors and the Pledge of Allegiance by the
Girl Scouts from various troops. Mayor Courtney welcomed them and read the
following proclamation:
75TH ANNIVERSARY PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the 75th Anniversary of Girl Scouting is a celebration of the vitality
of the world's largest voluntary organization for girls; and,
WHEREAS, it is•a celebration of a 75 -year commitment to meeting the changing
needs of girls; and,
WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a spirit of adventure that challenges Girl Scouts
to learn new skills, to try new activities and to explore other cultures; and,
WHEREAS, it is a celebration of Girl Scouts' gifts of service and good citizen-
ship to our communities and neighborhoods; and,
WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a bright future for young women and for Girl
Scouting; and
WHEREAS, our community has been the direct beneficiary of this 75 -year tradition;
and,
WHEREAS, the 30,000 girl members in the Greater Minneapolis Girl Scout Council
and the Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley will be the leaders of our future;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, C. Wayne Courtney, by virture of the authority vested in me
as Mayor, do urge the citizens of Edina to support the Girl Scouts in their
celebration; I now proclaim this week, March 7 -14, 1987, as
GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN EDINA
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith, seconded by
Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda, with the exception of the removal
of item V.A.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -264 WEST 50TH STREET FROM EDINA
COURT:TO HALIFAX AVENUE; CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Affidavits of Notice were presented
by Clerk,;; - approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer.Hoffman recalled that
the Council gave concept approval to the construction of West 50th Street in March
of 1985 and that the portion from Highway 100 to -Edina Court was ordered and was
constructed in 1986. This hearing is for the purpose of discussing the design of
the section from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue on which the Council gave concept
approval to rebuild the street to the existing width. Construction costs are
estimated as follows: Street Surfacing at $258,157.76, Watermain at $49,396.40,
Sanitary Sewer at $6,455.68, Storm Sewer at $66,408.72 and NSP Overhead Wire
Removal at $130,000.00 for a total cost of $510,418.56. The project is proposed
to be funded through utility and state aid funds with no assessment to property
owners. Mr. Hoffman presented the following specific engineering recommendations:
A) Bury NSP power lines, B) Move North sidewalk to provide better boulevard,
C) Construct retaining walls of similar materials, and D) Reforest North boulevard
or plant new trees in boulevard in between existing trees with ultimate removal
of existing trees. He explained that in connection with burying the NSP power
lines it would be necessary to have ground mounted transformers in certain
locations. It is recommended that serious consideration be given to removal of
the 9 existing elm trees and then to reforest. As to timing, Mr. Hoffman presented
the following: Alternate A - 1987 construction to start June 8 with completion by
mid -July with postponement of the France Avenue project. Alternate B - Construction
after completion of the France Avenue project - probably 1989. Mr. Hoffman said
the Engineering staff would work with each property owner as the work progresses.
Since notices of the public hearing were mailed, a number of phone calls have been
received asking what we are proposing to do. Over the -.past two years that this
project has been proposed the residents living along West 50th Street have asked
that the trees be retained if possible. In response to .questions raised by. the
Council regarding the France Avenue project, Mr. Hoffman explained that Minneapolis
did submit the plans to the State two weeks ago. In talking with William Crawford,
District 5 Engineer, he explained that it would take 17 weeks from submission of
the plans until.the contract is let. That would mean the job would not start before
mid -July. The project would be segmented with the portion from West 44th Street
north to Excelsior Boulevard being completed in 1987 and the segment south.from
West 44th Street would be completed in 1988., Mr. Crawford indicated that they are
flexible and would work with Edina so that the West 50th Street construction and
the France Avenue project would not be scheduled at the same time. Charles Roberts,
4919 Arden Avenue, said he has a privacy fence along two- thirds of the length of
3/2/87
his lot. On the west tip of the fence there is a hedge and a corner landscape
design. He asked what would be done along his lot. He also,pointed out that
storm water seems to drain into only one of the storm sewers. Mr. Hoffman
replied that the fence would be left as is, the hedge would be saved, there .
would be a ope—foot limestone retaining wall installed on the outer face of the
hedge, and the corner landscaping would be left as is. He added that the
storm sewer system will be replaced. Paul Pearson, Pearson's Restaurant, said
that last year's road construction devasted many of the businesses at 50th and
France. A poll was taken in January among the 50th and France Business and
Professional - Association members and the majority wanted to postpone the project
as long as possible. Last week a telephone poll was taken of 30 of the businesses
and the majority said they needed a year off without construction for their
businesses to recover. Peter Meyers, Americana Bank, said last year's con -
struction hdd a negative financial impact on the businesses at 50th and France
and asked that the project be postponed for a year or two so that the seasonal
businesses especially could recoup their customers. Marilyn Curtis, 4400 West
50th Street, said that.consideration should be given to the residents living on
West 50th Street who were literally unable to get out last summer and who would
like to see this project finished as soon as possible. She also mentioned the
1988 Centennial and that events were planned for 50th & France and asked how
much cost would be added if the project was delayed for two years. William Orr,
4920 Arden Avenue, asked what would happen to his driveway if the sidewalk were
moved back. Mr. Hoffman said the driveway apron would be changed and that the
bank on his property would be graded back or a small retaining wall could be put
in. Mr. Orr added that the street has been neglected until recently, that the
buses disturb the houses and that he would like to see the project done soon.
Marcia Pincus:, Hagen -Daz store, said their profits were cut 50% by last year's
construction, that they have a seasonal business and if West 50th Street is
closed again this year they will be out of business. She suggested the project
start in September so it would not cut into the summer season. Mr. Hoffman
recalled that last September it rained on 16 of the 21 work days in September
and had we been in the middle of the construction it would have been difficult
to finish it in the construction season. Peter Griffin, owner of photo store,
said they opened the store last year and barely made it through the summer. He
said that if West 50th Street were to be closed again this year some businesses
will not survive. Solvie West, The Bookhouse, said that as a new business owner
last summer the - closure was devasting to'them and they would like another year
to get back on their feet. John Olson, 5000 Arden Avenue, said that he was in
favor of getting the project done as soon as possible and that delaying it for
a yearML:or two will only incur more expense. He -said he sympathized with the
merchants but that he felt people would find their way to the 50th and France
area. Nancy Perlman, S. Michael, said she sympathized with the residents, that
the area will survive another summer of construction but asked if it would
survive with the same retailers there, or will some of the newer business not
survive. Perry Anderson, Belleson's, said he was the president of the 50th and
France Business and Professional Association and a resident of Edina. On behalf
of the association he said this is a difficult decision for the Council, but
that as evidenced by the merchants who have spoken the closing of West 50th Street
last year for 10 weeks was a severe problem for many merchants; that closing
a second year in a row is a very serious problem and that they are asking for
one year of no construction. The Council then asked for more information on
the following: 1) cost of delay of the project, 2) detours for the project,
3) possibility of keeping one lane of traffic open during construction, 4) what
.road.projects scheduled for 1989 would get bumped, and 5) reforesting on the
north side of West 50th Street. Mr. Hoffman responded that the cost of delay
could involve another overlay if there was a severe winter next year estimated
at $5,000. As to construction costs, there is no way to predict the oil market
and costs could .go up if oil goes up. Labor costs could go up 3 to 4 %. The
official detour for the project would be Wooddale to West 54th Street to France
Avenue and would be signed as such. As to keeping one lane of traffic open
during construction, this is not a recommended alternative by staff, but if one.
lane were kept,.open it.would slow down.the. project considerably and would increase
the cost. As to state aid funds,. Mr. Hoffman explained that if the funds are
not used in 1987 for this project they are not lost. An additional project
could be accommodated in 1989 with state aid funds. In regard to the trees,
because those on the north side have been severely pruned to accommodate the
power lines and will likely never fill in completely, staff feels they should
be removed and replaced with trees as large as can be transplanted. Member
Kelly commented that she has considered the issue for a long time, and is in
charge of the Centennial events in that area and would like to see the project
done before then. She added that she is sympathetic with the concerns of the
merchants and that the City has been trying to keep that area vital and that
the merchants have responded every time they have been approached for volunteer
support. Member Kelly then made a motion to delay the construction of West 50th
Street from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue for two years until 1989. Motion was
3/2/87
seconded by Member Smith. Member Turner commented that she too has thought about
the issue a lot, that the Council carefully went - through many hearings two years
ago to try to make the right decisions for this area. She said she intended to
vote no on the motion because the additional cost of doing the project in 1989
is significant and that she felt the City should go ahead as originally planned,
do it as quickly as possible and get the job done. Member Richards concurred
that the project should not be postponed for two years as there may be some carry-
over from the France Avenue project and we may be looking at 3 to 4 years of
continuous construction. He said he felt the trees on the north side will not
survive and should be replaced. He added that to maintain the street for two
more years by patch work,-the cost of which would come from the general fund, did
not seem to be a fair expenditure of money. He said that he thought we could
respond to the concerns of all by extending the project several weeks and doing
it in phases to keep the road open and that this would be a better solution than
delaying the project for two years. Mr. Hoffman commented that if the trees on
the north side are under consideration for removal he recommended that the matter
be brought back to the Council at the next meeting as to the possibility of doing
the work with some traffic being kept on the street. Member Kelly questioned if
a compromise would really be workable. Following lengthy discussion, Member Richards
offered an amendment to the motion to continue the matter and direct the engineer_
to bring back at the next meeting alternatives for keeping the street open during
construction. Motion for amendment was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly
Mayor Courtney then called for a vote on the motion as amended.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly '
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR WHITE OAKS 8TH ADDITION DENIED UPON ADOPTION OF
FINDINGS OF FACT. Planner Phil Dommer recalled that the issue of preliminary plat
approval for White Oaks 8th Addition had been heard before the Council on
December 15, 1986 and that the Council had directed staff to prepare Findings for
denial. The matter was placed on the February 2, 1987 Council Agenda at which
time it was continued at the request of the proponent, Kenneth Monroe. Mr. Dommer
advised that Findings, Decision and Reasons have been prepared in support of a
decision to deny-preliminary plat approval. Staff would recommend that Council
adopt the Findings and deny preliminary plat approval. Member Richards questioned
if Mr. Monroe had received a copy of the Findings. Mr. Dommer stated that a copy
of the Findings were mailed to Mr. Monroe on January 29, 1987 but that he did not
know if Mr. Monroe had responded. Motion was made by Member Kelly to adopt the
Findings, Decision and Reasons and to deny the proposed subdivision for White Oaks
8th Addition based on the Findings as presented by staff (copy attached). Motion
was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH)
CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Council was advised that the proponent and an adjoining
property owner are investigating the impact of private deed restrictions at the
site and it is requested that this matter be continued until March 16, 1987.
Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public
hearing for preliminary plat approval for Lot 5, Muir Woods, to the meeting of
March 16, 1987.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6938 -6940 MALONEY AVENUE. Motion was made by Member
Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution:
RF.gnT.TTTTnw
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lots 14 and 15, Block 9, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A: The East 62.83 feet of Lot 14 and the East 62.83 feet
of the South 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 9, "WEST MINNEAPOLIS
HEIGHTS ", City of Edina, Minnesota, and reserving easements of
record, if any.
and
Parcel B: That part of the South�.,24.00 feet of Lot 15, lying west of
the East 62.83 feet thereof, and,
That part of Lot 14 lying west of the East 62.83 feet thereof, except
that part lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the west
line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet north of the southwest corner
3/2/87
thereof to a point on the south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet
east of the southwest corner thereof,
All in Block 9, "WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS ", City of Edina, Minnesota,
and reserving easements of records, if any.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of
land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No.
801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless
made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6119 -6121 HABITAT COURT. Motion was made by Member
Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution:
RFgnT.TTTTnm
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A: That part of Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT, according to
the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying northeasterly of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point
on the westerly line of said Lot 14 distant 45.62 feet south of the
most northerly corner thereof, as measured_along said westerly line,
to a point on the south line of said Lot 14 distant 64.75 feet westerly
of the most easterly corner thereof, as measured along said southerly
line, and reserving easements of record.
and
Parcel B: That part of Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT, according to
the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying southwesterly of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point
on the westerly line of said Lot 14 distant 45.62 feet south of the
most northerly corner thereof, as measured along said westerly line,
to a point on the south line of said Lot 14, distant 64.75 feet westerly
of the most easterly corner thereof, as measured along said southerly
line, and.reserving easements of record.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of
land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No.
801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless -
made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. Motion was made by Member
Smith and seconded by Member Turner setting March 16, 1987 as hearing date
for the following Planning matters:
1) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Shadow Hill Townhomes - Generally
located north of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Court
2) Final Development Plan - Midwest Federal Building Expansion -.3100 West
66th Street
3) Preliminary Plat Approval - John Laurent and Associates - Generally located
north of West 78th Street and east of Marth Road
4) Preliminary Plat Approval - DCI Second Addition - Generally located south
of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
3/2/87
BIDS AWARDED FOR VEHICLE PURCHASES. Mr. Rosland advised that the low bidder
for the 3/4 ton Van did not meet specifications and staff would recommend that
the bid be rejected and that the vehicle be rebid. Motion of Member Kelly was
seconded by Member Turner to reject all bids for one (1) 3/4 ton Van and to
rebid the vehicle -T --
Ayes: Kelly, rRichards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Bids were presented for various vehicles as follows:
Type /Quantity of Vehicle Bidder Bid
Three 4 -door Sedans Suburban Chevrolet $10,570.79
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recom-
mended low bidders for all vehicles as presented, with award of bid for one dump
truck each to North Star International and Superior Ford, who were tied for low
bid.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276, BA -277,
CONTRACT #87 -3 (ENG). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member
Turner for award of bid for Public Improvements Nos. BA-272, BA -273, BA -275,
BA -276 and BA -277 to recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, at $155,329.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR REMODELING OF SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATIONS CONTINUED TO 3/16/87.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to continue the
award of bid for remodeling of (2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations to the meeting of
March 16, 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
CONCEPT APPROVAL GIVEN TO ARNESON ACRES PARK MASTER PLAN. Manager Rosland recalled
that at the last meeting the Council had considered a master plan for the Arneson
Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of the facility
by the Garden Council and the Edina Historical Society. During the discussion a
number of issues and questions were raised and the matter was continued to this
meeting so that staff could prepare additional information in response as to the
feasibility of the plan. Mr. Rosland noted that the report included a history of
the Park, objectives of the Edina Garden Council, objectives of the Edina Historical
Society, the phasing schedule for the Master Park Plan, the proposed Phase I and II
improvements to the Arneson house, the joint use Operating Policies, a suggested
Capital Improvement Schedule, a suggested Maintenance Operation Cost schedule for
the greenhouse and gardens and Estimated Operating Expenses for the Garden Center/
Historical Society Museum. A time schedule to complete a Conditional. Use Permit
for the property was also presented. The est,imated.cost to complete Phase.I for
the Arneson house is $35,000 which staff recommends be taken from the developer's
fund. Mr. Rosland added that if concept approval is granted then staff would proceed
with the Conditional Use Permit process for a public hearing on April 20. If the
Conditional Use Permit is granted it is assumed that the project would go forward.
Member Kelly asked if the Permit is granted would the Council still have the chance
to approve development of the gardens. `Mr. Rosland said that the Council has the
opportunity to review the Capital Budget each year and to approve the capital .-
expenditures for the park as it is developed. The key issue would be the Condi-
tional Use Permit and approval of the $35,000 expenditure for Phase I improvement
to the Arneson house. Concept approval would give the 1988 Centennial Commission
Thane Hawkins
10,578.00
Superior Ford
10,999.00
Two
Dump Trucks
North Star International
37,497.00
Superior Ford
37,497.00
Astleford.International
37,575.00
Boyer Ford
37,650.00
Lakeland Ford
38,041.72
One
3/4 Ton Pick -up
Thane Hawkins
10,897.00
Superior Ford
11,965.00
One
3/4 Ton Pick -up with
Thane Hawkins
12,867.00
4 x
4 box
Superior Ford
14,489.00
Two
fire - engine red
Suburban Chevrolet
10,570.79
4 -door Sedans
Superior Ford
11,091.00
Thane Hawkins
11,237.00
One
3/4 ton Pick -up
Thane Hawkins
13,267.00
4 x
4 without box
Superior Ford
14,489.00
One
medium duty Truck
Suburban Chevrolet
20,237.22
Superior Ford
20,269.00
Astleford
20,466.00
Boyer Ford
22,576.00
Lakeland Ford
22,559.73
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recom-
mended low bidders for all vehicles as presented, with award of bid for one dump
truck each to North Star International and Superior Ford, who were tied for low
bid.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276, BA -277,
CONTRACT #87 -3 (ENG). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member
Turner for award of bid for Public Improvements Nos. BA-272, BA -273, BA -275,
BA -276 and BA -277 to recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, at $155,329.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR REMODELING OF SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATIONS CONTINUED TO 3/16/87.
Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to continue the
award of bid for remodeling of (2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations to the meeting of
March 16, 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
CONCEPT APPROVAL GIVEN TO ARNESON ACRES PARK MASTER PLAN. Manager Rosland recalled
that at the last meeting the Council had considered a master plan for the Arneson
Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of the facility
by the Garden Council and the Edina Historical Society. During the discussion a
number of issues and questions were raised and the matter was continued to this
meeting so that staff could prepare additional information in response as to the
feasibility of the plan. Mr. Rosland noted that the report included a history of
the Park, objectives of the Edina Garden Council, objectives of the Edina Historical
Society, the phasing schedule for the Master Park Plan, the proposed Phase I and II
improvements to the Arneson house, the joint use Operating Policies, a suggested
Capital Improvement Schedule, a suggested Maintenance Operation Cost schedule for
the greenhouse and gardens and Estimated Operating Expenses for the Garden Center/
Historical Society Museum. A time schedule to complete a Conditional. Use Permit
for the property was also presented. The est,imated.cost to complete Phase.I for
the Arneson house is $35,000 which staff recommends be taken from the developer's
fund. Mr. Rosland added that if concept approval is granted then staff would proceed
with the Conditional Use Permit process for a public hearing on April 20. If the
Conditional Use Permit is granted it is assumed that the project would go forward.
Member Kelly asked if the Permit is granted would the Council still have the chance
to approve development of the gardens. `Mr. Rosland said that the Council has the
opportunity to review the Capital Budget each year and to approve the capital .-
expenditures for the park as it is developed. The key issue would be the Condi-
tional Use Permit and approval of the $35,000 expenditure for Phase I improvement
to the Arneson house. Concept approval would give the 1988 Centennial Commission
3/2/87
r11
a preliminary go -ahead to begin the raising of funds for Phase II. Member
Kelly them moved concept approval of the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan. The
motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Kelly said she would expect the
Park Director to advise the Council how the Arneson Acres Park would fit into
long range planning for the Park Department. Member Richards said that there
is an issue that needs to be addressed. This is a dedication of land made by
Morten Arneson and his wife in 1969 with certain goals and objectives that he
envisioned for the future and which the Garden Council has done over the years.
Now there is a second entity in the Edina Historical Society which has made a
significant contribution to the City but is still a private institution. The
proposal would give a private body significant control over public property.
Mr. Rosland responded that he did not perceive the City giving control to
either organization. Both groups are quasi - public and both function exactly
the same but neither one are official wings of the City through any board or
commission established by the City. What we are trying to do is find a home
for two groups -that have been very active and beneficial to the community. The
Council has full control of this piece of property including any buildings
existing or built thereon in the future and would retain full rights to the
property. Member Smith commented that he liked the proposal because it would
get two active groups in a cooperative situation which would be positive for
them. The Historical Society has been looking for a home for some time and
this also enables the Garden Council to move forward with the fulfillment of
Morten Arneson's dream for the layout and development of the park. This is an
opportunity to get some organizations into the house who will be responsible
and will want to keep it up. He said they_ are to be commended for their efforts
in working out a shared use of the facility and that in reviewing the data he
understood that they would be using the facility subject to the City's control.
Member Turner said she felt this was a wonderful partnership, a good addition
to the City which neither group could have accomplished alone, and that she was
supportive of the project. She said the only question is that as the Council
looks at the Park Department budget each year that we make sure the operating
policy agreement between the groups and the City is working. As the Garden
Council develops its programs in .the future they may be in a position to contri-
bute to the operating costs. Phyllis Kenaston, past president of the Garden
Council, said that in 1976 when this property was dedicated it was to become�a
park and a garden in Edina. The Edina Garden Clubs have worked diligently
towards this goal. She said she heartily endorsed the master plan that has
been drawn for the Arneson Acres Park for the reason that it will contribute
to fulfilling the purpose for which this property was dedicated. She urged the
Council tp'give the plan their most positive consideration. Shirley Peterson
said she had been a greenhouse volunteer for nine years and that the garden club
members had spent alot of time working with Mr. Arneson and Mr. Kojetin, Park
Director. The club volunteers spend some 500 hours each year in preparing for
and conducting their annual plant sale to earn money to support their projects.
The clubs also are responsible for planting the many flower beds located through-
out the City and prior to this being done by the clubs the Park Department had
spent approximately $5,000 per year for this.. In this way, she said the Edina
Garden Council has been making a considerable contribution to the City for the
past nine years. Many of the members also felt that it was Mr. Arneson's intent
that his home would be available for their use. He had indicated that they had
alot to learn and that he also wanted them to share their knowledge with others.
Mrs. Peterson said that following the discussions with the Historical Society
70% of the Edina Garden Council membership voted to share the facility and worked
with Mr. Dunwiddie on the master plan and the renovation of the house. She
concluded her remarks by saying she felt the house was in excellent condition
and objected to spending the money for the renovation. Jim Fenlason, president
of the Edina Historical Society, said he sympathized with what had just been
spoken. He said the Historical Society is in accord with the documents that
have been reviewed by the Council and that they are an expression of the needs
of both groups. They are looking forward to the shared use of the facility
and, hopefully, in expanding it into a museum in the next few years. There
being no further discussion, Mayor Courtney called for vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Manager Rosland.said staff would proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process.
In response to Member Smith's question as to timing for the Centennial Commission
fund raising drive, Mr. Rosland said that April 20th would be the earliest date
this could be addressed following the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit.
UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR. Member Turner said that included in the Council
packets was the Proposed Public Participation Plan for the I -494 Corridor Study.
The plan adds just one item to what was discussed before and that is the first
step of individual City meetings. She explained that some of the cities wanted
a briefing before they participated in a corridor -wide meeting. She asked if this
3/2/87
was the consensus of the Council. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Smith that the Public Participation Plan for the I -494 Corridor Study
include individual City meetings as the first step.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Turner said the general time frame for public participation is between
now and May, 1987 and that a newsletter will be issued soon to discribe the
process so far on the I -494 Corridor Study. Engineer Hoffman presented graphics
which summarized the last 8 to 9 month's of effort for the study. Preliminary
data showed 2010B forecasts which is the numbers the cities sent to the Metro-
politan Council as to what they belive will happen by 2010 as to employment,
trips, etc. Figures for 2010C is the Council's forecast for what will occur in
the corridor by 2010. He said the Metropolitan.Council now has to resolve some
of the differences in these numbers. Basically, population forecasts are not
far apart. In the employment forecasts there is some difference and when you
get to the trip.forecast..for--:the estimated land use the numbers are significantly
different. As to the impact of these numbers, Mr. Hoffman said that 40,000
vehicles per day equates to approximately one lane of traffic on the freeway.
Using the cities' forecasts for 2010 with build -out as allowed by existing ordi-
nances, four lanes each way would be needed on 1 -494 west of Highway 100 and
five lanes would be needed east of Highway 100 to make it work.. He emphasized
that these are preliminary figures at this point in time. The issue now for
the study is the feasibility of improving 1-494 to accommodate the forecast
numbers. Following discussion, Member Turner reiterated that land.use is the
key to these issues. .
APPOINTMENTS MADE TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS. Following the Council inter-
views with applicants for advisory boards and commissions held on February 23,
1987, appointments were made as follows. Motion of Member Smith was seconded
by Member Kelly for appointment of Lee Johnson to the Community Development
and Planning Commission for a three year term to 2 -1 -90.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith for appointment of Robert
Christianson to the Edina Park Board for a three year term to 2 -1 -90.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for appointment of Sally
Tang to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term
to 2 -1 -89.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
As recommended by Mayor Courtney, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member
Kelly.for re- appointment of individuals to the .various advisory boards and
commissions as follows: Community Development and Planning Commission_ (term
to 2- 1 -90): Del M. Johnson, Jane Paulus and Virginia Shaw; Edina .Park Board
(term to 2- 1 -90): Andrew E. Montgomery, Jean Rydell and Donald E. Wineberg;
Board of Appeals & Adjustments (term to 2- 1 -90): Rosemary Utne; Building
Construction Appeals Board (term to 2- 1 -90): Arthur H. Dickey and Rudy Trones;
Human Relations Commission (term to 2- 1 -90): Doris Barman, Otto Byhre, Thomas
Oye and Geoffrey Workinger; Edina Recycling Commission (term to 2- 1 -89): Virginia
Bodine, Nancy Grimsby and C. Levering Wood; Edina Heritage Preservation Board
(term to 2- 1 -89): John J. Metil, David Gepner, Thomas Martinson and Lois Wilder;.
Community Health Services Advisory Committee (term to 2- 1 -89): Dr. Sharon Aadalen,
Holly Branch, Virginia McCollister, Effie McKerson and Dr. Walter Wilder; Edina
Art Center Committee (term to 2- 1 -90): Elizabeth Eisenbrey, Peter R. Spokes, Lee
Heikens and Judy Smith; South Hennepin Human Services Council (term to 2 -1 -89)
Leslie A. Olsen and Leslie Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
It was noted that there has been a resignation from the Edina Recycling Commission.
Applications will be received through March 9 and interviews will be scheduled
for March 16 with appointment in the Council meeting following.
COUNCIL LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS. CONFIRMED. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Turner for approval of the following Council liaison assignments with
advisory boards.and commissions: Member Kelly - Community Health Services
Advisory Committee and Edina Art Center; Member Richards - Edina Park Board,
Building Construction Appeals Board and Human Relations Commission; Member Smith -
Edina Recycling Commission, Edina, Heritage Preservation Board and Board of Appeals
and Adjustments; Member Turner - Community Development and Planning Commission and
South Hennepin Human Services Council.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
3/2/87
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that
Alison Fuhr was first appointed to the Traffic Safety Committee as a representa-
tive of the Citizens' Safety Council. Subsequently Lois Coon was named by the
Council as a citizen -at -large representative. Meanwhile, Mrs. Fuhr was appointed
to the Regional Transit Board (RTB) and up to last fall there had been no conflict.
However, TRB activities have increased to a point where she now finds attendance
at the Citizen's Safety Council difficult. This has been discussed with Lois Coon
and she is willing to have their respective roles reversed and that action is
recommended to the Council. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner
that Alison Fuhr be appointed as citizen -at -large representative to the Traffic
Safety Committee and that Lois Coon be appointed as the representative of the
Citizens' Safety Council.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*FEASIBILITY REPORT APPROVED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; HEARING DATE SET. Motion
was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -37
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -278
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a.preliminary report as
to the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice
of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements,
:said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested
in said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time;
place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper
once a week for. two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be
not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to
all affected properties in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -47
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -278
TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, March 16,
1987 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be
constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set
forth below:
STT)RWAT.K
Improvement No. P -S -37 $ 53,673.98
Vernon Avenue from Villa Way to Interlachen Blvd.
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING /CURB AND GUTTER
Improvement No. P -BA -278 170,047.24
Link Road from Eden Avenue to Vernon Avenue
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
Improvement No. 87 -5 65,000.00
Link Road and Vernon Avenue
The project is proposed to be funded by HRA funds.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING FAU FUNDING FOR FRANCE AVENUE PROJECT. Motion
was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING APPROVAL OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY
FEDERAL AID URBAN (F.A.U) PROJECT SUBMITTAL FOR A
PROJECT WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA FOR 1989 THROUGH 1991
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body
of the City of Edina; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council encourages and participates with improvements to obtain
adequate transportation facilities in the metropolitan area; and,
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Transportation application for F.A.U.
funding during the time period shown above includes the following project within
the City of Edina; and,
3/2/87
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this project is warranted
and desirable for improvement through the Federal Aid Urban Program..
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA
IN REGULAR MEJET-ING ASSEMBLED that the Transportation Advisory Board, the
Metropolitan'Council, and other boards and commissions associated there -
with are hereby advised that the City of Edina concurs with and supports
the Hennepin County F.A.U. project application for the following project
within the City of Edina for time period 1989 through 1991:
County Project 8110; CASH 17 (France Avenue) "Capacity Project"
from W. 70th St. to W. 77th St. including grading, surfacing and
traffic control signals.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward
a.certified• copy of this resolution to Dennis L. Hansen, Chief, Transpor-
tation Planning Division, Hennepin County Department of Transportation,
320 Washington Avenue South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
EDINAMITE '87 CO- CHAIRMEN COMMENDED. Member Smith moved that, on behalf
of the Council, the Mayor issue a letter of commendation to Virginia Bodine
and Kenneth Rosland for their efforts in co- chairing EDINAMITE '87. Motion
was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
DEER IN BRAEMAR PARK DISCUSSED. Member Kelly recalled that a resident had
stated her concern about the deer population in Braemar Park and of damage
to her property adjacent to Braemar. She said she would like a report on
what is being done as she had a deer in her yard recently that did damage.
Manager Rosland said.that Gordon Hughes has been working with the DNR on this
matter and will update the Council at the next meeting.
REPORT REQUESTED ON SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM. Member Kelly asked that a report
be given the Council on the progress of the speed control program which the
Police Department is conducting. Mr. Rosland that report would be provided.
NUMBER OF CITY VEHICLES REQUESTED. Member Kelly asked that she be provided
by March 15 with the number of vehicles which carry the City's emblem so that
this number could be included in the Centennial budget for Centennial logos.
JOINT rIEETING OF COUNCIL /SCHOOL BOARD DISCUSSED. Member Kelly requested that
a joint meeting of the Council and the Edina School Board be arranged soon.
She referred to the plans for expansion of the Braemar Sports Complex and
that it probably will require some public effort if it is to come forth. Last
month's report of the School Board announced that their long range planning
forecast E. referendum a couple of years from now. This could mean that the
two public bodies could perhaps be burdening the citizens at the same time with
a tax increase. She said she felt it important-to sit down together and discuss
that possibility and other issues that would be of mutual concern..
STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT ON MARCH 21 DISCUSSED. Member Kelly asked that with
regard to the Strategic Planning retreat scheduled for the Council on March 21
that she would like the Council to receive materials in advance of that date to
prepare them for the discussions they will be holding. Member Turner explained
that the Strategic Planning.Calendar.for 1987 which was given to the Council
described the agenda for that meeting as: 1) Review of the 1986 work program,
2) Broad discussion of issues in relationship to the Mission Statement, .
3) Identification of key issues, and 4) Adoption of goals for 1988. She said
that she and Gordon Hughes were asked to facilitate the meeting and would be
appreciative of input from the Council Members. Mr. Rosland said that the
information would be sent to the Council promptly and the matter could be put
on the agenda for March 16 for discussion as to finalizing the agenda for
March 21.
LEGISLATIVE ISSUES DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported that with regard to
issues being considered by the legislature that the AMM Board had voted to take
a position of opposing the proposed 6% sales tax on governmental purchases.
She asked for the Council members input and also what impact a sales tax would
have on the City. She suggested legislative issues be discussed at the next
Council meeting since there had not been a special meeting with legislators.
Mr. Rosland commented that the MLC is studying that issue and each city has
filled out a questionnaire and the information is being correlating and will
be discussed at the next meeting. He said he would bring that information back
to the Council to see how the cities would be affected by the various proposed
taxes. The Council could then take a position which would be conveyed to the
legislators through the MLC lobbyists.
3/2/87
RESIGNATION FROM EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION. NOTED. Manager Rosland called
the Council's attention to a letter from Jack Rice in which he tendered his
resignation from the East Edina Housing Foundation because he has moved his
principal residence from the City of Edina. He said the Council has the respon-
sibility of appointing an individual to the foundation. He asked that the.
Council give it some consideration, that the individual should be well founded
in the background and history of Edina and should understand what Edinborough
is about. He said he would be happy to suggest names of people who have been
involved if the Council so desired. No action was taken.
PRELIMINARY REPORT GIVEN ON EDINAMITE '87 PROCEEDS GIVEN. Mr. Rosland reported
that preliminary figures indicated that the proceeds from EDINAMITE '87 will be
approximately $10,000. This figures includes the bid of $2,150 for the Council
hosted party which was offered in the silent auction.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for
payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 3/2/87: General Fund
$81,381.01, Park Fund $85.47, Art Center $6,630.25, Capital Fund $2,660.12, Golf
Course Fund $245.76, Recreation Center Fund $4,838.17, Utility Fund $229,377.48,
Liquor Dispensary Fund $6,606.71, Construction Fund $2,800.15, Total $334,625.22.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared
the meeting adjourned at 10:22 p.m.
City Clerk
II.
Consent
Agenda
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK -�M O
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF COUNCIL MINUTES - August 4, 1986
DATE: MARCH 13, 1987
At its meeting of August 4, 1986 the Council adopted -a resolution approving
the revised Final Plat for Indian Hills 3rd Addition, which resolution
listed the name of all individuals or corporations who collectively were
platting the property.
The plat was finally brought in for signatures of City officials this
week. There have been some changes in the names of those listed who are
platting the property. The resolution adopted on August 4,-1986 should be
amended to reflect the plat as officially signed. The revised resolution
follows (deletions are shown as strike - throughs and additions are underlined):
"RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by Indian Hills
Company, a Minnesota general partnership and Norwest Bank Bloomington, a
national banking association; Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general
.partnership and Home Savings Association of Kansas City, F.A.; The Minnesota
South District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit
corporation and Cross View Lutheran Church, a Minnesota non - profit corporation;
Folke R. Victorsen Co., a Minnesota dorporation and Indian Hills Company, a
Minnesota General partnership; Kenneth A. Macke and Kathleen Macke, husband
and wife, end- F }s- L7seeR9a- has- 6e�pen�;- e- W9eeas8- eepa�$ee; and
FBS Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation; and Arley B. Bjella and
Beverly H,;;Bjella, husband'and wife, and Metropolitan Federal Savings Bank
of Moorhead, a Federal Savings Bank, and presented at the regular meeting of
the City Council of August 4, 1986, be and is hereby granted final approval."
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by Indian Hills
Company, a Minnesota general partnership and Norwest Bank Bloomington, a
national banking association; Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general
partnership and Home Savings Association of Kansas City, F.A.,; The Minnesota
South District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit
corporation and Cross View Lutheran Church, a Minnesota non - profit corporation;
Folke R. Victorsen Co., a Minnesota corporation and Indian Hills Company, a
Minnesota general partnership; Kenneth A. Macke and Kathleen Macke, husband
and wife, and FBS Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation; and Arley B. Bjella
and Beverly H. Bjella, husgand and wife, and Metropolitan Federal Savings Bank
of Moorhead, a Federal Savings Bank, and presented at the regular meeting of
the City Council of August 4, 1986, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1986.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City. Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 1986, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 10th day of March, 1987.
City Clerk
a
III. A.
MEMORANDUM
TO: KEN ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: FRANCIS J. HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINE
SUBJECT: 50TH STREET
The attached items will be discussed in detail on Monday, March 16, 1987.
FJH: lmb
3/13/87
•
W. 50TH STREET
COMMON ELEMENTS OF PLAN A, B,'& C.
Side street traffic blocked from access to 50th.
Trees north side removed.
NSP to remove overhead wires.
Sidewalk north side to be moved north 2'.
Rebuild all retaining walls north and south side to Lannon Stone.
Street to be built in same location.
6 day - 12 hr. - work week.
No truck or bus traffic.
Differences
Plan "A"
Street closure completely for 6 weeks.
Lowest cost construction.
Early start.
Detour to 54th St. during entire construction.
Plan "B"
Street closure completely 12 -2 weeks, then two way traffic.
11 week completion -- longest.
Costliest to construct - Additional - $53,750.00.
Create hardship on north abuting property owners.
Detour to 54th St. for 2 week period.
LATE START because of wait for NSP pole removal.
Plan "C"
Allow continuous E. B. traffic flow although restrictive, minimal additional
cost $29,350.00
No detour for E. B. traffic to business district.
10 week completion.
(subject to flagging for certain operations).
III.A.
ONA From the Desk of:
.1 M BELLIGAN
JIM d JANET AVE. ESO.
EDIN BRUCE 542 S0.
EDINA, MN 55424
c�
4t�No-- OVA,, c � --
�T� xw-'c--
I
we c
w s gents, dd-�:
4 940 1 est tr 4 apo is, innesota 55435 • (612) 835 -2131
PP
PP
P°
m
From the Desk of:
JIM b JANET BELLIGAN
4616 BR CE AVE. SD.
EDINA, M% 51424
III.A.
JIM BELLIGAN /
3 /(a �77
i
Old Northwest Agents,
4901 West 77th Street, Suite 154, Minneapolis, Minnesota
= .I
i' V � 2
f
i43 • (612) 5 -213
50th &
FRANCE
BUSINESS It PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424
March 12, 1987
III.A.
To: Ken Rosland; Fran Hoffman; Mayor Courtney; & Board members,
Leslie Turner, Peggy Kelly, Glen Smith, and Fred Ridhards.
From: 50th & France Business & Professional Association
Re: Proposed 50th St. closing the summer of 1987
We would like for you to be aware of our position regarding the
proposed 1987 50th St. closing. At our 3/4/87 membership meeting;
our members were in agreement that if the street is to be done
during the summer of 1987; we unanimously support it being done
with 2 lanes being left open during the construction. If this is
not feasible; we favor postponement of 2 years.
Thank you for your consideration.
III. B. C. D.
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
IMPROVEMENT NO. P - BA -278
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
LINK ROAD BETWEEN EDEN AVENUE & VERNON AVENUE
IMPROVEMENT NO. P - S - 37
SIDEWALK
VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN VILLA WAY AND INTERLACHEN BLVD. (NORTHSIDE)
VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN LINK ROAD AND JERRY`S WEST DRIVEWAY (SOUTH SIDE)
IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LINK ROAD AND VERNON AVENUE
The Edina City Council will on :Monday, March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., at the
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Hearing on the necessity
and feasibility of constructing permanent street surfacing, sidewalk and traffic
signals on the above listed streets. This hearing has been called as a result
of redevelopment in the Grandview area. Your receipt of this notice is an
indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties
which are considered to be affected.
The proposed improvements are a result of.redevelopments in the Grandview area
and traffic concerns expressed by residents over the years. A Grandview area
traffic study was conducted in 1984 to determine what traffic improvements
should be made to the area. One issue area identified was the difficulties at
Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. This proposal would close the intersection of
Eden at Vernon. Additionally, new developments occurring on the north and west
side of Vernon Avenue suggest the need for better pedestrian access to the
Grandview area. These situations result in the proposed projects listed above.
Improvements Estimated Cost
P -S -37 - Sidewalk $53,673.98
P -BA -278 - Permanent Street Surfacing & Curb & Gutter $170,047.24
No. 87 -5 - Traffic Signal $65,000.00
The funding for these proposed improvements would be HRA funds and County funds,
if available. Construction of these improvements, if approved, could be accompish-
ed in 1987 and 1988.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement
may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hear-
ing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information,
please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
you.
Francis J. Ho fm .E.
Director of Pub is Works
and City Engineer
FJH:lmb
3/6/87
I
LOCATION MAP I V. A. 2.
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER S -87 -4
L O C A T 10 N North of West 78th Street and east
of Marth Road
REQUEST create one new buildable lot.
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
S -87 -4
General Location:
Preliminary Plat Approval for
John Laurent and Associates
North of West 78th Street and
east of Marth Road
Mr. Dommer informed the Commission the subject property is
comprised of two, developed single family lots. Together the
lets have a frontage of 268 feet on--Marth Road and a total area
of 41,184 square feet.
The proponent has submitted a subdivision request which
would create one new buildable lot. The existing home on the
southerly lot would be removed. The existing home on the
northerly portion of the property would remain. Lot widths for
the new lots would be ii2 feet, 84 feet and 82 feet. Lot areas
would be 17,970 square eet, 12,964 square feet-and 10,250 square
feet. All three lots would Ordinance requirements for single
dwelling lots.
Mr. Dommer pointed out the properties along Marth Road are
undergoing a transition. Several large older properties have
been replatted in recent years. The most recent, Braemar Hills
11th Addition, created the lots on the west side of Marth Road.
The new lots opposite the subject property are 100 feet wide.
The topography of these lots is significantly different than that
of the subject property. The lots on the west side of the road
drop off dramatically. The buildable area on the subject
property is relatively level.
Mr. Dommer concluded staff believes the proposal is a
logical continuation of the redevelopment of the area. The
proposed new lots will provide building sites compatible with
others in the neighborhood. The extra width of the lots on the
west side of Marth is needed to compensate for the extremely
steep slopes on the -lots.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat
subject to: .
1. Final Plat Approval.
2. Subdivision Dedication.
I
3. Utility Connection Charges
Mr. Laurent, proponent was present.
Mr. Laurent told the Commission the existing home on the
site will be removed or demolished. fir. Laurent said in his
opinion this proposal is a continuation of the redevelopment of
the area.
Mr. Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval.
Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
carried. -
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 25, 1987
S -87 -4 Preliminary Plat Approval for
John Laurent and Associates
General Location: North of jest 78th Street and
east of Marth Road
refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat
The subject property is comprised of two, developed single
family lots. Together the lots have a frontage of 268 feet on
Marth Road and a total area of 41,184 square feet.
The proponent has submitted a subdivision request which
would create one new buildable lot. The existing home on the
southerly lot would be removed. The existing home on the
northerly portion of the property would remain. Lot widths for
the new lots would be 102 feet, 84 feet and 82 feet. Lot areas
would be 17,970 square feet, 12,964 square feet and 10,250 square
feet. All three lots would Ordinance requirements for single
dwelling lots.
The properties along :earth Road are undergoing a
transition. Several large older properties have been replatted
in recent years. The most recent, Braemar Hills 11th Addition,
created the lots on the west side of Marth Road. The new lots
opposite the subject property are 100 feet wide. The topography
of these lots is significantly different than that of the subject
property. The'lots on the west side of the road drop off
dramatically. The buildable area on the subject property is
relatively level.
Recommendation:
Staff believes that the prop
of the redevelopment of the area.
provide building sites compatible
neighborhood. The extra width of
Marth is needed to compensate for
the lots.
osal is a logical continuation
The proposed new lots will
with others in the
the lots on the west side of
the extremely steep slopes on
Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat
subject to:
1. Final Plat Approval.
2. Subdivision Dedication.
3. Utility Connection Charges
1 1
L o
lr �
I 1 l
LOT DIVISION. BOOK y, PAGE
JOb NO. °-/7.4' - U i
K.4.L1..6S1P Ell:
JOAN LAURENT & ASSOCIATES
11785 SUNNYBROOK
EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
NIAIt I F1 ROAD
I ncreby rerhty 11101 Ines pion was prepared by me
Of under my direct supervision ana that I am o duly
kc'glstrrrd Land Surveyor under the laws of the
Sfufe at Minnesota.
Jrtlly`D. L`4ndyren, MIn11. keg. No. 14376
LEGAL- DESCR1 P11ONS
1111(11T1Y0 LEGAL ufi]CIIIPTIhN
lul 1, YIuaY 1, YIMSOY ADO I7IUN, •auu, Jlue '. Ill- I.—j ylYt
1b.r•a f, eoJ
14•
b Suulb 1111.6 (Y.l of lLY XuI IL :Itll. lain y( II.. wr:•1 :.4.0
fv•l of Ih• burls••.( I/4 of Ih• Ynu111r••I 1/4 of heal lu. tl,
Turn•111P llb, it es 21 Meet .f Ih. ht11 I'r lurll••1 M,r141•n,
All In the Clly of 941... tlehn•yln c —, Y, Mll,u•.0 I..
PYOPOSNO LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
ra
TL• N.rt11 142.1 h.l 0Ir IAY Suulh 1411.6 levl of Ih. Murlh 'Jlll.b
het of the r.el 2z4.0 het ut IL. soul seer( 1/4 ut IL• soul hrs.t
1/4 u( bwllu. b, Tur.•hip Ilfi, N..,N. 'G1, Ctly of hJlr.a. Ila uu.yln
"..Y. In is
T4• South Ob.11 f..l of lh. Nur14 'Jtl1.4 (u.rl u( Zhu west :114.4 foal
of lh. Euulh...l 1/4 of IL• Soul hr..l 1/9 of b.al lun b, turu•Irly
114, N.uY. 21, Clly of hdln., Ilan uel•,u L'uuul Y. Ml,rue.ul ., •uJ Ihel
p.rl ut L.1 1, Yloch 1, rINSUN ADb111UN, lylue ninth of the South
Y. oo , tv•t lhV •r.a f, ..y.. . rJl to tit. r.0rd P1.1, the.(, Clly f 11J Mlo,Y eot.
rALICki,4:.
1. he South 112.011 f..t of L., I, tl1uaL 1, wlNbbll Aubl1'IUN, --a""
lu ll,. record V1.1 lh.r•uf, C,,, rt Edlue, 4•nn•Plo
M 1111.1. u l Y.
IN III 1
JO __.. 60
• Denotes Iron Found
HEDLUND ENGINEERING
1AVIA7 SERVICES, INC.
Cos 1-6-1161 11.11 Iu1Y11011 11rb1U11 ••Ilunlll
woo 9•w-
Ph... W.•.we 05.70
•
�.Z,
parcel A
... G Parcel • C
•
Parcel
~B
. •l:
� � is �� /..y„ tiara" \.. V;I:Y'
.�
au V
/
1 •/
I
NIAIt I F1 ROAD
I ncreby rerhty 11101 Ines pion was prepared by me
Of under my direct supervision ana that I am o duly
kc'glstrrrd Land Surveyor under the laws of the
Sfufe at Minnesota.
Jrtlly`D. L`4ndyren, MIn11. keg. No. 14376
LEGAL- DESCR1 P11ONS
1111(11T1Y0 LEGAL ufi]CIIIPTIhN
lul 1, YIuaY 1, YIMSOY ADO I7IUN, •auu, Jlue '. Ill- I.—j ylYt
1b.r•a f, eoJ
14•
b Suulb 1111.6 (Y.l of lLY XuI IL :Itll. lain y( II.. wr:•1 :.4.0
fv•l of Ih• burls••.( I/4 of Ih• Ynu111r••I 1/4 of heal lu. tl,
Turn•111P llb, it es 21 Meet .f Ih. ht11 I'r lurll••1 M,r141•n,
All In the Clly of 941... tlehn•yln c —, Y, Mll,u•.0 I..
PYOPOSNO LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS
ra
TL• N.rt11 142.1 h.l 0Ir IAY Suulh 1411.6 levl of Ih. Murlh 'Jlll.b
het of the r.el 2z4.0 het ut IL. soul seer( 1/4 ut IL• soul hrs.t
1/4 u( bwllu. b, Tur.•hip Ilfi, N..,N. 'G1, Ctly of hJlr.a. Ila uu.yln
"..Y. In is
T4• South Ob.11 f..l of lh. Nur14 'Jtl1.4 (u.rl u( Zhu west :114.4 foal
of lh. Euulh...l 1/4 of IL• Soul hr..l 1/9 of b.al lun b, turu•Irly
114, N.uY. 21, Clly of hdln., Ilan uel•,u L'uuul Y. Ml,rue.ul ., •uJ Ihel
p.rl ut L.1 1, Yloch 1, rINSUN ADb111UN, lylue ninth of the South
Y. oo , tv•t lhV •r.a f, ..y.. . rJl to tit. r.0rd P1.1, the.(, Clly f 11J Mlo,Y eot.
rALICki,4:.
1. he South 112.011 f..t of L., I, tl1uaL 1, wlNbbll Aubl1'IUN, --a""
lu ll,. record V1.1 lh.r•uf, C,,, rt Edlue, 4•nn•Plo
M 1111.1. u l Y.
IN III 1
JO __.. 60
• Denotes Iron Found
HEDLUND ENGINEERING
1AVIA7 SERVICES, INC.
Cos 1-6-1161 11.11 Iu1Y11011 11rb1U11 ••Ilunlll
woo 9•w-
Ph... W.•.we 05.70
•
•
LOCATION MAP I V. A. 3.
p j
_ l �
t
NUMBER
1
om
no
S -87 -5
s.
i
l NTERLACHE�N
C
L O C A T 10 N South of Waterman Avenue and east
of Blake Road
REQUEST create one new buildable lot
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
®1
of
grg
S -87 -5
s.
i
l NTERLACHE�N
C
L O C A T 10 N South of Waterman Avenue and east
of Blake Road
REQUEST create one new buildable lot
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
®1
G lip
5 -87 -5
Generally Located:
Preliminary Plat Approval
for DCI Second Addition
South of Waterman Avenue and east
of Blake Road
_.Mr. Dommer told the Commission the subject property measures
approximately 122 feet by 580 feet and is 56,800 square feet in
area. The property is a through lot with frontage on Interlachen
Boulevard and on Blake Road. An existing dwelling is located on
the southerly portion of the property relating to the Interlachen
Boulevard frontage. �-
The proponents have submitted a request for subdivision
which would create one new buildable lot fronting on Waterman
Avenue. The lot would be 122 feet wide, 233 feet deep and would
contain 28,515 square feet. Existing single family dwellings are
located to the west and north of the proposed lot, and to the
east is Interlachen Country Club. -
The subdivision ordinance requires that all of the property
be included in the plat. The lot for the existing dwelling would
become Lot 2 of the new plat. Utility easements along the
property lines are not shown on the preliminary plat These
easements are required. The plat must also dedicate the right of
way for Interlachen Boulevard.
Mr. Dommer concluded the proposed lots are compatible with ,
and larger than existing lots in the neighborhood. The proposed
lot width of 122 feet compares to an average width of 92 feet for
existing lots fronting on this block of Waterman Avenue.
Staff recommends preliminary plat approval with the
following conditions and modifications.
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Subdivision dedication.
3. The inclusion of all of the property in the plat and
easements for roadway and utility purposes.
4. Dedication of property south of Interlachen Boulevard
as an Outlot.
Mr. R. Chase, representative for D.C.I Construction,
Incorporated was present.
Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Chase the reason for splitting the
lot as it is shown on the preliminary plat. Mr. Chase replied
the lot was split on the sanitary sewer line.
Mr. Del Johnson moved to recommend preliminary plat approval
subject to staff conditions. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion.
All were in favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNI`hY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 23, 1987
S -87 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval
for DCI Second Addition
Generally Located: South of Waterman Avenue and east
-of Blake Road
Refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat
The subject property measures approximately 122 feet by 580
feet and is 56,800 square -feet in area. The property is a
through lot with frontage on Interlachen Boulevard and on Blake
R =ad. An existing dwelling is located on the southerly portion
of the property relating to the Interlachen Boulevard frontage.
The proponents have submitted a request for subdivision
which would create one new buildable lot fronting on Waterman
Avenue. The lot would be 122 feet wide, 233 feet deep and would
contain 28,515 square feet. Existing single family dwellings are
located to the west and north of the proposed lot, and to the
east is Interlachen Country Club.
The subdivision ordinance requires that all of the property
be included in the plat.. The lot for the existing dwelling would
become Lot 2 of the new plat. Utility easements along the
property lines are not shown on the preliminary plat These
easements are required. The plat must also dedicate the right of
way for Interlachen Boulevard.
Recommendation
The proposed lots are compatible with , and larger than
existing lots in the neighborhood. The proposed lot width of 122
feet compares to an average width of 92 feet for existing lots
fronting on this block of Waterman Avenue.
Staff recommends preliminary plat approval with the
following conditions and modifications.
1. Final Plat Approval
2. Subdivision dedication.
3. The inclusion of all of the property in the plat and
easements for roadway and utility purposes.
4. Dedication of property south of Interlachen Boulevard
as an Outlot.
PRELIMINARY PLAt OF D.C.I. SECOND ADDIYION . i
_ I tom 1 aA1 rMaRas 1.7— !` W1aa
•aVQ ^!w.•v!• fa•a•raaw. a•!.. .. �. lwlw• a1.•I• Mrr w•t•rl Nl .. •••• aw• w ar !w•ww! prltw N W arna•rl Wrur N aoe.lr tl.• 4 —•rw
paatMf 11.• ^I 111 d• � 111. .� Yli •••e•rw• r aw • =rr w •. th1'Mw •I .
\flit � !•I •MO••a ••^••a •r- • N m r • Ne.:s a �Ll 1 t !rw r • wry
'••D••Ia -. ar rlrl• • !�. Iw.. , rn— Wrurr • rr•- w `rwr••M••r N M O •A•w•u�d -1! _
••awrw N• Wlr • +. I ••)r• M. 1•r• ) r•ww. awe. Mr••ul • Y ! tlw ar w a�(.ra•.•• :�• N
- Wtl :r �•.r. aw• w•ar�••rww ti. lOI,IY! )O. �a F.t. . T u -�/• •rP.•• W r•ww Ywev.• aa• ••!1„ �- `- _ .
sn.sr •w., tl- w ......• Ii ••..rw a •. re. Nv-
• se.. w. ssa• _ � . ..r.. .. al +aa i�a. �..w ..r.�. �.. r a ._.r —..
- ,• - _�. . w rrwn.! wl.ara! •r.. .wwn ..a.• .r r r•..w +
. - • W N '. rw r r •aw• -
' ' - � Mw Itr ar 1 r•r W. !• a•N�. N )Ia.•I !w• 'ar r 1 w • - _ '
. • • - Y Iw.w \ Ma Irw ! rl wlr N - I
• _ -- •.# .. Mi �r .•• err• r..w•' \) ...ww n a.-w �.r. r. ul.w -
••. PINY rflwrw• war•.•. r fi taawws•r1Yra0 Vw•r.
1 hereby artily that this survey was prepared by ale or under any dlrad supw*lon and that 1 am a duty R/gstea! tend Surveyor under IM has d the State of Mlnnesott '
. !
S s WATERMAN AVENUE s 1
:•!•If IIw1 .1 Lat•171, 7p77lLll:•f •NMr........... Mell:a.w/•10f•!•1..•y .w t..... l.n. /l fwl rf0 ••1 {•w�. - .
e...i•• —..
173
- ..
zz
Ir
•4
IT-As
lo
Jz
OLINT
0 '1a•1 \Yea as a•. fa••w !!:• •ra air /71�.f0all]:].l !U.
• O 1
-
331.5 a� — - --
'Sw1h 1'nr d •wr a E. era ./ s•cf•w iC. T.If•, •.7�aa sNh
l—, of •!•:l =s s:ea. R3
• mfr • O,
FYI
r
LOCATION MAP I V. B.
REZONING &
SUBDIVISION
nuMBER z -86 -1
S -87 -2
L 0 C A T10 N North of Crosstown Highway and east and north of
Vernon Court
REQUEST 15 Unit Townhouse Development
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�! f
Subdivision No 5-07-(
SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT
TO: Planning Commission
Park Board
Environmental Quality Commission
FROM: Planning Department w' /
SUBDIVISION NAME: 5k3c1W �1 OWN
LAND SIZE: .16 - TcwAot'(.4e_ /jj LAND VALI& :�3 D Gi
(By: Date
The developer,,-of this subdivision has been required to T
11 A. grant an easement over part of the land
ElB. dedicate % of the land
NJC. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land
As a result of applying the following policy:
A. Land Required-.(no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of
land dedicated)
1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition
beneficially expands the park.
2. If property is 6 acrt:s or will be combined with future dedications
so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park.
II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream.
4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged
or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds.
D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his-
toric value.
6.
B. Cash Required
1. In all other instances than above.
El 2.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
HELD ON FEBRUARY 25, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, Del Johnson.
John Bailey, Virginia Shaw, Helen
McClelland, David Runyan, John Palmer
and Jane Paulus
MEMBERS ABSENT: Philip Sked and William Lewis
STAFF PRESENT: Philip S. Dommer, Associate Planner
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. NEW BUSINESS:
Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling
Q \� & Unit District to Planned Residential
5 -87 -1 District PRD -2
and
Final Plat Approval for Shadow Hill
Townhouses
Mr. Dommer reminded the Commission preliminary rezoning of
the subject property was granted by the City Council on October
20, 1987, and preliminary plat approval was granted on January
26, 1987.
Mr. Dommer explained the proponent has returned with overall
development plans and is requesting a final rezoning and final
plat approval. The plan continues to illustrate a 15 unit
townhouse development contained in four separate buildings. All
of the building provide the required setbacks. A couple of minor
changes have occurred since preliminary approval. First family
rooms are illustrated on the two end units. These rooms measure
approximately 16 feet by 214 feet. The rooms provide the
necessary setbacks. Second, the deck areas over the garages have
been replaced by hip roofs. Except for the above noted changes,
the unit plans are as in the approved preliminary plan.
Mr. Dommer added several details of the landscape plan and
schedule should be pointed out. First, the plan empathizes
screening of the project from the highway through plantings on
the south side of Vernon Court. Due to the proximity of these
plantings to the street damage by snowplows could occur. The
small distance between the street and the highway fence makes
this unavoidable. Second, a small retaining wall is proposed
south of Vernon Court in the extreme southwesterly corner of the
site. This retaining wall must be moved at least five feet back
from the curb line. The landscape schedule proposes that 11
existing hardwood trees count toward the requirement. These
trees should be identified on the plan. Sixteen seedless ash
trees are proposed at 2 inches in size. The Ordinance specifies
a minimum size of 2 1/2 inches. Finally, the proposed retaining
walls north of the units lack sufficient detail to determine
their adequacy.
Mr. Dommer concluded the proposed overall development plans
are consistent with those given preliminary approval. The
changes to the plan are minor and do not represent a change which
significantly alter the approved concept. Staff concerns are
with site development features outside the proposed buildings.
These concerns are technical in nature and can be reviewed by
staff prior to issuance of building permits.
Staff recommends final rezoning and final plat approval
subject to the following conditions
1. No permits shall be issued until evidence that the plat has
been recorded and real estate taxes and special assessment
payments are current are provided.
2. The following changes and modifications to the landscaping
plan be approved by the Building Inspector and City Engineer
prior to issuance of a building permit.
A. Retaining wall in southeasterly corner of site be moved
5 feet back from curb line or be removed.
B. Existing mature trees on site should be illustrated on
the plan an tagged on site.
C. All landscaping stock shall be at least at the minimum
Ordinance size requirements.
3. A detail of the proposed retaining wall system be provided
which illustrates the height of all walls, materials, and the
frequency and type of proposed tie - backs. This plan should be
prepared and signed by a registered architect or engineer.
3. Subdivision dedication.
Commission Members briefly discussed the proposed plans and
agreed that any technical concerns should be worked out at a
staff level.
Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend final rezoning and plat
approval subject to staff conditions. Mr. Palmer seconded the
motion. 11r. G. Johnson Abstained. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 25, 1987
Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling
& Unit District to Planned Residential
S -87 -1 District PRD -2
and
Final Plat Approval for Shadow Hill
Townhouses
General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and east of
Vernon Court
Refer to: Attached plans, minutes and previous
staff reports
Preliminary rezoning of the subject property was granted by
the City Council on October 20, 1987, and preliminary plat
approval was granted on January 26, 1987.
The proponent has returned with overall development plans
and is requesting a final rezoning and final plat approval. The
plan continues to illustrate a 15 unit townhouse development
contained in four separate buildings. All of the building
provide the required setbacks. A couple of minor changes have
occurred since preliminary approval. First family rooms are
illustrated on the two end units. These rooms measure
approximately 16 feet by 214 feet. The rooms provide the
necessary setbacks. Second, the deck areas over the garages have
been replaced by hip roofs. Except for the above noted changes,
the unit plans are as in the approved preliminary plan.
Several details of the landscape plan and schedule should be
pointed out. First, the plan empathizes screening of-the project
from the highway through plantings on the south side of Vernon
Court. Due to the proximity of these plantings to the street
damage by snowplows could occur. The small distance between the
street and the highway fence makes this unavoidable. Second, a
small retaining wall is proposed south of Vernon Court in the
extreme southwesterly corner of the site. This retaining wall
must be moved at least five feet back from the curb line. The
landscape schedule proposes that 11 existing hardwood trees count
toward the requirement. These trees should be identified on the
plan. Sixteen seedless ash trees are proposed at 2 inches in
size. The Ordinance specifies a minimum size of 2 1/2 inches.
Finally, the proposed retaining walls north of the units lack
sufficient detail to determine their adequacy.
Recommendation
The proposed overall development plans are consistent with
those given preliminary approval. The changes to the plan are
minor and do not represent a change which significantly alter the
approved concept. Staff concerns are with site development
features outside the proposed buildings. These concerns are
technical in nature and can be reviewed by staff prior to
issuance of building permits.
Staff recommends final rezoning and final plat approval
subject to the following conditions
1. No permits shall be issued until evidence that the plat has
been recorded and real estate taxes and special assessment
payments are current are provided.
2. The following changes and modifications to the landscaping
plan be approved by the Building Inspector and City Engineer
prior to issuance of a building permit.
A. Retaining wall in southeasterly corner of site be moved
5 feet back from curb line or be removed.
B. Existing mature trees on site should be illustrated on
the plan an tagged on site.
C. All landscaping stock shall be at least at the minimum
Ordinance size requirements.
3. A detail of the proposed retaining wall system be provided
which illustrates the height of all walls, materials, and the
frequency and type of proposed tie - backs. This plan should be
prepared and signed by a registered architect or engineer.
3. Subdivision dedication.
L/
°d Ba
"AU I -N -
sceL� $
fl ICJ: f
� b'tNdtO WON MdfJUAltfJt
btAwGs §Ild*u dJtt h§§uAltd
cd'old d thunum; INS.
.titiu:�hs; Cd�Jd Silkvt:ib'tt`s; 6LdFIF1�lr§
e
SHADOW HILL TOWNHOUSES C.R. DOC. NQ
V( MMIN
MUDS
�ra.v I xea•x5y'w
,�—
1:'p, •I g�
fie?
Lim tltlrU1M N111 Wyl IfM
to x[ IN nI NWWo15e•Unna ... - .•.- ... 1
9dn1 WdllIFfI ydlA bl da ftlleff `�I11P
of xt l /AalNWll WSftlydab
�l•
i` .`I 4�j tty�xf yl kt UA 61 '
bs
.� RA I dbl lklroa b
r j-// - v e.—
----------
wvt% -ol
-AN"P
lu
�Z
Z- -7
..........
...... =0 CL DARRELL INC.
.... . . . . ITECIUM E a FLAMMIMQ
got.
1111.0.1 ill i1f
IMP
DAVID C. DARRELL INC.[-
UR 11AIII.M.
LAX:
ARCHITECT
IS.-ISOM
I 11.011:L ...
Sol �as I
�. g3
S.M.
OA
1 1
1 1 �
40 0
. s.
i
r
.I
AL7E�.1.UIt FWi:LY Fae7I�
` w
'•'�"
DAVID C. DARREtt INC
A 6 PLANNING
...+
G. �'�.
:NITECTUR`.•
t
eM..Law1 LaluY1 J
eVa IEN(p iELTIOy i1A�L
%coyv F�ovR IU•y
DAVID C. DARRELL INC.
ARC N ITLCTYRE R PIANNINO
-_ -- • o` n =• Y.Lw. -- YM4OM yvs 41. W.f'll. 1..,
�, ,, ,,,. ,,....: ,irnu� •ow• - .wu.+a �ouA. .�.nwu s..n
rl Re ular S_Au tember 8 86 were a
urner, seconded by , approved
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion w
Member Turner to adopt the consent s- Member Kelly and seconded by
as presented.
co Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, R' s, Turner, Courtney
LO Motion carried.
M ORDINANCE NO. 825- TED FIRST READING; R -1 TO PRD -2 ZONING FOR ROBERT HANSEN.
Q Attorney Ericks ised that the findings of facts that the Council had asked
staff to pre t the meeting of September 15, 1986 have been prepared and were
Gsent out a developer last week.
C�� by Mr. en's attorn fpceived
b• wa taining
rinent being heard, Member Turner introduced Ordinance
1p• for First Reading as .follows: ,
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A16.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -2)
THE CITY C_
OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -2) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property:
That part of the NE-1, of the NW4 of Section 6, Township 116, Range 21, described
as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of said NE-4 of the NW4; thence South
along the West line of said NE4 of the NW4 a distance of 709.1 feet more or
less to a point which is distant 814.5 feet North of the SW corner of said NE4
of the NW4; thence Easterly on a deflection angle to the left of 87 degrees
40 minutes a distance of 676.3 feet; thence running North parallel with the
West line of the NE-4 of the NW4 a distance of 674.9 feet more or less to the
North line of said Section 6; thence West along said North line a distance of
678.6 feet more or less to the beginning, which lies Northeasterly of the
Northerly line of the County Road.
The West One Hundred Fifty (150) feet of that part of the Northeast Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter (NE-14 of NW4) and the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter (NW4 of NE-14) of Section Six (6), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116)
North, Range Twenty -one (21) West, described as follows: Beginning on a point
in the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4 of NW4)
distant 814.5 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence running East
and a deflection angle to the right of 920.20' a distance of 676.3 feet; thence
North parallel with the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter (NE4 of NW4) a distance of 366 feet to a point which is 283.9 feet South
of the North line of said Section Six (6); the actual point of beginning of the
tract to be described; thence running East on a deflection angle to the right
of 920 20' a distance of 1317.5 feet more or less to the centerline of the Town
Road, also known as Gleason Road as now laid out and travelled; thence North -
easterly along said centerline a distance of 384.7 feet more or less to its
intersection with the North line of said Section Six (6); thence West along
said North line a distance of 1426.3 feet more or less to a point which is
distant 678.6 feet East of the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter (NE-4 of NW4); thence South parallel with the West line of said
Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4 of NW4) 182.9 feet to the point
of beginning.
Which lies Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the East
1/4 corner of Section Six (6), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116), Range
Twenty -one (21), thence North 000 09' 27 seconds East along the East line of
said Section Six (6) a distance of 1807.59 feet; thence North 780 48' 33 seconds
268
West a distance of 1070.37 feet; thence North 810 13' 33 seconds West a
distance of 1031.19 feet; thence North 120 36' 50 seconds East a distance
of .490.0 feet; thence South 770 23' 10 seconds East a distance of 100.0 feet
to0 the � actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North
77 23 10 seconds West a distance of 180.30 feet; thence along a tangential
curve to the left with a radius of 687.96 feet (delta angle 300 18' 23 seconds,
tangent distance 186.31 feet) a distance of 363.89 feet; thence South 720 18'
27 seconds West along tangent to last described curve a distance of 145.43
feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 839.93
feet (delta angle 220 43', tangent distance 168.72 feet) a distance of 333.02
feet; thence North 840 10' 27 seconds West a distance of 600.0 feet and there
terminating. Said last described course is not tangent to last described curve;
subject to easements, covenants and restrictions of record, if any; it being the
intention to convey the westerly 150 feet of said tract measured perpendicularly
to the west line of said tract."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
Motion for First Reading of the Ordinance was seconded by Member Bredesen who
commented that the findings of fact confirmed his position on the rezoning
request. Member Richards reiterated his concern that he felt the subject
property should not be developed to the maximum density and that the Council
should bbd responsive to the concerns raised by the neighborhood. Member Kelly
commented that she had been the other negative vote when the Council had last
considered the rezoning request and that in consideration of the findings of
fact, even though the developer has presented plans for maximum density, she felt
the proposal cannot be denied. She added that her support was contingent upon
all taxes being paid up before a building permit is issued. Member Bredesen
said that with regard to this particular property there are a number of factors
that would favor this level of density, its location and proximity to the
crosstown highway, its proximity to other properties that were allowed to be
developed at a similar density and the public open space behind the development.
Member Turner said she based her support on the guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance
and the Comprehensive Plan in which the Council had looked carefully at the land
use plan in determining the most appropriate use for each part of the City.
Paul Carson, 6001 Pine Grove Road, suggested a change in the Zoning Ordinance that
would put a limit on the number of units for the various zoning districts instead
of the range of density the ordinance now provides. There being no further
comment, Mayor Courtney called for a rollcall vote on the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
First Reading granted.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR CARROLL ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented
by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the
request for preliminary plat approval for property generally located west of Gleason
Road and north of Valley View Road. The subject property contains 41,355 square
feet and is developed with a single family dwelling. Immediately to the north is
St. Albans Episcopal Church; all other surrounding uses are single family dwellings.
The owner of the property has submitted a request to subdivide the property in order
to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain 19,346 square feet and the
lot for the existing dwelling would contain 22,207 square feet. Both lots would
exceed ordinance requirements for lot width, depth and area. The existing dwelling
would maintain the required 10 foot setback from the new property line. Mr. Larsen
pointed out that lots along this section of Valley View Road vary significantly in
size and shape and range from approximately 13,000 square feet to over 40,000
square feet for this parcel and one other. Lots to the south and east are generally
smaller and lots to the west are larger than those proposed here. The proposed lots
front on Valley View and should be evaluated in light of conditions on Valley View
HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1986 At M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Wil ' ewis, John Bailey, Del
Johnson, G Johnson, John Palmer, John
Skagerb ane Paulus, Helen McClelland and
Virgi aw
MEMBERS ABSENT: ked and David Runyan
STAFF PRESENT: raig Larsen, City Planner
Fran Hoffman, City Engineer
Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary
I. APP, OF THE MINUTES:
DeAdarPalmer moved for ap
ment and
---A-ll were in favor. The motion
II. OLD BUSINESS:
(� Z -86 -1 Robert Hansen
R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2,
Planned Residence District.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that the subject
proposal has been before the Commission several times. The most
recent proposal was heard and denied at the July 2, 1986 ;meeting.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent has
submitted new plans for review. The plans continue to illustrate
15 townhouse units. Size and design of the units remains
unchanged from previous submittals. However, unlike previous
plans, the new plan conforms to the setback requirements of the _
PRD -2 District. A front setback of 30 feet and rear setback of
35 feet are provided.
Mr. Larsen. concluded the revised plan provides the minimum
setbacks required. The plan now conforms to all requirements of
the PRD -2 Zone and staff recommends preliminary rezoning
conditioned on:
1. Acceptable overall development plans.
2. Final platting.
3. Subdivision dedication.
The proponent, Mr. Hansen and architect Mr. Daryl were
present.
Mr. Palmer moved for rezoning approval. Mr. Bailey seconded
the motion. Mr. Gordon Johnson abstained. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
APRIL 2, 1986
Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling
Unit District to PRD -3, Planned
Residential District
General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and
east and north of Vernon Court
Refer to: Attached preliminary plans.
The subject property measures approximately 220 feet by
`680 feet and is 138,900 square feet in area. This vacant
parcel is zoned R -1, but is shown on the Comprehensive Plan
as suitable for low density attached residential at up to 6
units per acre. Directly south of the property is the
Crosstown Highway. City owned open space (Krahl Hill)
borders most of the northerly property line. North of the
westerly portion of the site there is one single family home
and two, 5 unit townhouse projects. Directly to-the east is
a 36,000 square foot parcel owned by the Masonic Temple.
Further east are the doubles along Gleason Court.
The proponent is requesting a rezoning of the property
to PRD -3 to allow for the development of 16 townhouse units
evenly divided among four buildings. All units are proposed
as 2 story structures, with basement and an attached 2 car
garage. Half the units would provide approximately 2,600
square feet of living area and half would contain nearly
3,000 square feet of finished space not including basement.
Exterior materials would be primarily brick with some wood
accents.
The PRD -3 zone requires a front street setback of 35
feet, an interior side yard setback of 20 feet and a rear
yard setback of 35 feet. All four buildings fail to provide
the required front street setback. The proposed front
street setbacks vary from 6 feet at the cul de sac to 25
feet for portions of the most westerly building. the 30
foot setback illustrated on the plans is measured from the
street and not the property line as required. The typical
setback provided is 15 feet. The most westerly building
provides a 25 foot rear yard where 35 feet is required.
Recommendation:
Staff supports the townhouse concept and the density
proposed for this site. It is compatible with other nearby
developments. The development proposal is also consistent
with policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, especially
its attempt to avoid the steep slopes on the site. However,
we believe the proposed front street setback variance is too
great. As proposed it would not be possible to park on the
driveway without violating the City's Nuisance Ordinance
which requires that parking be at least 15 feet from the
curb. A front street setback of 25 feet would be more
reasonable. This could be accomplished without significant
alteration of the hill, but would not allow rear yards for
the 2 easterly buildings. Staff recommends continuing this
item to allow the proponent to rework the site plan within
the following parameters:
1. Front street setback of 25 feet.
2. A setback of 20 feet from the cul de sac.
3. A 35 foot rear yard setback from the northerly
property line.
4. Hennepin County approval of any landscaping on
the right -of -way. The preliminary plan proposed
a heavy landscape buffer south of Vernon Court.
In the past the county has not allowed landscaping on
its right -of -way.
sz c.' ► rwa � .. - a e
r.ru.. a o n.0
-
� ►n�aaa au..•a� r
CJ .NO..sv.Ir cu.. - a• N. WY w uN..i
� wuar..w r.Na I:a• � a.arT ... _._
a .Yard ...a. � rr�v...s.>o •a...a ..a r
3 e
1" <� �; � � •, , alt: t tt tit Z ZZ
Y CSR N c N .� \` � I- _ i1��- _ •`\ ` \\ \' �__ ,,.
- -- — 1M
OAVID C. DARREII INC.
f NI..eN K A V►YaN the =ITECTIIRC 1 PIANFiYC
uw er ..n ...n a• —� �'� -_ NYy01'I. MI! 4YFl.:■ laY!
-._ _... .i. a.. Y0.�t4� Nu,IM. f.rwl 1!.! /FOY! .•e.!l.lue a
UNIT 7F - - "SOU T- Ji— EL!•VATIQ "/•1
r
5 1
v t
_ 1 ` 1L
LNtT -SID T -rr cz—� �..� _ _
5r_R..rwr —�_ 1 _A_.`__._ . c' A v -► r 1 e .c
.o J. •� X�jl,S s i ._ .. j iT,,s r"�f�l " +t rFt .p.'�,'. •j hr� ,i .
..� .- 4• ., ' .- aw1Y wsrr srl�f DAVID C. DARREIt INC.
lftp•v1 LL a Iv«oi .vi ARCNIfECTURN A ►IANMIMO
' _ fGlr ..... M.ww ��OtN MII IYIIN• 111 ;
V y 1W1wY qw./t T1lIfw011 �IfIII IW
� 1 I
UNIT 7F - - "SOU T- Ji— EL!•VATIQ "/•1
r
5 1
v t
_ 1 ` 1L
LNtT -SID T -rr cz—� �..� _ _
5r_R..rwr —�_ 1 _A_.`__._ . c' A v -► r 1 e .c
.o J. •� X�jl,S s i ._ .. j iT,,s r"�f�l " +t rFt .p.'�,'. •j hr� ,i .
..� .- 4• ., ' .- aw1Y wsrr srl�f DAVID C. DARREIt INC.
lftp•v1 LL a Iv«oi .vi ARCNIfECTURN A ►IANMIMO
' _ fGlr ..... M.ww ��OtN MII IYIIN• 111 ;
V y 1W1wY qw./t T1lIfw011 �IfIII IW
/
~N
^
`
`
I or_z��z�n��
^
-
DAVID C. CARRELL INC.
11
0
�'1 . sr: .a,..v. nmi Rw �r'1•r' n►ceMeYT ��mlr RAI.c
1.16 DAVID C. DARREII INC. an
w" PANNING
w Y....• w.n -- Y�w�M R % I.MaI 7 41! . YYl1111 UN!
— -- N lOIY4 LYIIY !4l!
.f.h YY.fwl .'pY�., Yft I!llAOY! EIlYlf N4
i Mp , ■
SOUTHDALE
SHOPPING CENTER
■
a
�e
des :s
i•
A 2R TA/1 E N
P -87 -2
Request:
Zoning:
Final Development Plan
Midwest Federal
3100 West 66th Street
Midwest Federal Building Expansion
Planned Office District
Mr. Dommer informed the Commission the subject property is a
triangular parcel forming an island at the intersections of
Xerxes Avenue, York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is
currently developed with a 4810 square foot circular structure
and 2 drive up teller kiosks. The proponents request approval of
a plan to add approximately 2210 square feet to the building by
extending the circular pattern 8 feet and enlarging the
underground vault. Two additional drive -up teller kiosks will
also be added. The proposed plan provides several site
improvements by eliminating several non - conforming setbacks and
providing additional landscaping. Surplus parking in excess of
ordinance requirements by 8 parking stalls is also incorporated
into the plan.
Mr. Dommer pointed out in general the proposed site conforms
to ordinance requirements, however, the proponents request
consideration for permitting three non - conforming features to
remain. One, the parking stalls adjacent to the flagpole do not
provide the required 10 foot setback from the building. Two, an
existing parking stall at the entrance from Xerxes Avenue is
setback less than the required 20 feet from the right of way.
Three, the service kiosks at the drive up teller are at a width
of 8.5 feet instead of the required 9 feet. The proponents have
agreed to reduce the exit width from the drive -up teller area to
20 feet as required. The plan currently shows a 32 foot width
which may encourage entry at that point.
The proposed plan continues the design of the existing
materials using colored steel panels and clear glass.
Mr. Dommer added despite the unusual shape of the site, the
proposed plan provides several site improvements and permits a
reasonable expansion and additional parking on -site.
Staff supports the request for the non - conforming setbacks
to parking, however, prefers that the drive -up teller width be
increased to 9 feet as the ordinance requires. Other new drive -up
teller facilities in the City have met this requirement.
Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends Final Development Plan
approval conditioned on Hennepin County approval regarding access
design, the reduction of -the drive -up teller exit to 20 feet
maximum as previously stated, and drive up teller widths of 9
feet.
Mr. Egge, representing the proponent Midwest Federal was
present.
Mr. G. Johnson questioned Fran Hoffman, City Engineer, as to
whether the island on 66th Street was to be extended east past
Xerxes preventing access from Xerxes to eastbound 66th Street.
Mr. Hoffman responded that it was his understanding that the
County planned to do that, Mr. Hoffman suggested that the bank
review this with Hennepin County and assess its impact on their
traffic circulation.
A brief discussion ensued between Commission Members and Mr.
Egge regarding the request by Midwest Federal to construct the
drive -up teller widths at 8.6 feet instead of the required 9 feet
which is stipulated by the Edina Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Runyan
suggested staff study the reason(s) for the stipulation of 9 feet
between drive -up aisles. He pointed out the ordinance may not
have addressed the fact that cars are now scaled smaller. The
8.6 feet requested by the proponent may be adequate for the
times. Mr. Egge said Midwest Federal would prefer the 8.6 foot_
width but has no problem with the Ordinance requirement of 9
feet.
Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend approval subject to staff
conditions and the condition that the drive -up teller widths
remain at 9 feet. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All were in
favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
FEBRUARY 25, 1987
P -87 -2 Final Development Plan
Midwest Federal
3100 West 66th Street
Request: Midwest Federal Building Expansion
Zoning: Planned Office District
Refer to: Attached Plans
The subject property is a triangular parcel forming an
island at the intersections of Xerxes Avenue, York Avenue and
West 66th Street. The site is currently developed with a 4810
square foot circular structure and 2 drive up teller kiosks. The
proponents request approval of a plan to add approximately 2210
square feet to the building by extending the circular pattern 8
feet and enlarging the underground vault. Two additional
drive -up teller kiosks will also be added. The proposed plL -i
provides several site improvements by eliminating several
non - conforming setbacks and providing additional landscaping.
Surplus parking in excess of ordinance requirements by 8 parking
stalls is also incorporated into the plan.
In general the proposed site conforms to ordinance
requirements, however, the proponents request consideration for
permitting three non - conforming features to remain. One, the -
parking stalls adjacent to the flagpole do not provide the
required 10 foot setback from the building. Two, an existing
parking stall at the entrance from Xerxes Avenue is setback less
than the required 20 feet from the right of way. Three, the
service kiosks at the drive up teller are at a width of 8.5 feet
instead of the required 9 feet. The proponents have agreed to
reduce the exit width from the drive -up teller area to 20 feet as
required. The plan currently shows a 32 foot width which may
encourage entry at that point.
The proposed plan continues the design of the existing
materials using colored steel panels and clear glass.
Recommendation
Despite the unusual shape of the site, the proposed plan
provides several site improvements and permits a reasonable
expansion and additional parking on -site.
Staff supports the request for the non - conforming setbacks
to parking, however, prefers that the drive -up teller width be .
increased to 9 feet as the ordinance requires. Other new drive -up
teller facilities in the City have met this requirement.
Staff recommends Final Development Plan approval conditioned
on Hennepin County approval regarding access design, the
reduction of the drive -up teller exit to 20 feet maximum as
previously stated, and drive up teller widths of 9 feet.
♦� i
Sri DJ1N
`aj
is ►3(
• " ✓1 . - . is .:.
>EVKRA- %-"MS
SIGN _[LEND
[�
r
ALL ■.S- SIT6 ""-.0 {OMEN ?I -♦
SJller !T G{ aA/ ZA A 7..Lm.-E S -=75
KflY
7NVfl
�n�kSIOS'IM
QJAI.:TV
D /lO'fGIMl 7 "'1104)AMD SR RAMS MM:Wf
A
DAIVi -1N Ti WlIL•
=4
1 B'. %P;DYEE MAKING'
- -�L -_ _ •f13T ;pYTOUR
slL
ADLf �OIA
&~ A �
G
'DD MOT 5%,rr •
Q,
D
'04AMD.4AI VAA—fi ONLY
)
[S LT 'pN1L MA-C1►K L 5{
W
/17LpSED 'DrAL. AVIAMG . 41
t!�,
4
JS
WOV
cc .co 2
W
i
►
`aj
is ►3(
�IZia
[�
r
=4
W
:i
i
1- M*.1--------- - -
LANDSCAPE PLAN
P- ANTING /AAT!R.AL •LN lDJLi • i�n4E N�TA
K!Y
="MON NAMG
•1!!
MRnOO
QUMTITY
MJLf
A
NOIMAY MAP-&
KLIL MTANOID.t
oft-
•b
q
M7. U-.
•
P.M DAR
QI[11Q/f PAWSTRls
tit•
50
q
ND UII
L
GRYJN[ :.00N3T
GLNP"IA - M.AcAulwa
'.[YL+M!'
sMt•
••
$
ND WiP
D
MINT .1"p .kwlpsft
4VMIP7IIN3 "IN•N•IL
'MMT µA{P•
�• -LV•
wT
•S
6TOI!
[
i1M4P ptMGfD •'VITA"
a- ALMTA ETA
Y'b•
M
1!D
jrvey for —F
'.IID'wvEST FE,—.,<AL SAVINGS a LOAN ASSOCIATION f
(DIVA• MINNESOTA SITE
'Z— 7
40.
10
Z
A
vii
Coll
W
x
W
X
W 66TH ST (GO. RD. NO. 53)
\�I
I. R.
•.•.... .....
� IBA&W-
�2-PiAbt C, E. COULTER IS ASSOCIATES. INC.
Ise.IC1 o MAU 2001 MAM ",tc ern ��1 1 � • - �=
IlE I�trtlFr 1�. �p Irw (�1 ISM 11 ^-' �/ 1
•�rru .. .1'i•. �I .1�... 1'11 ��a r'— .ILV+ -����
BRANCHI OFFICE AN �I� J • I .
rMNA
a�
�i!j q
f�� ^IORTw'OLD PALAU 1001 OL90" UCMfEC76
nr.wm-n.ruu t/rn - uvr w. /nr SI,OICi r..3�,..]SYG
Fiji
r
fl 1 r
FEDERAL
8AVING9 AND LOAN
I
1
ORANCH
BRANCH OFFICE
,
EDIN1. MIMIE60TA
�'
' I• il.li.l��!Il,�i� ! ',III,::; �'1
WEST, v1sumiq
ICI
EA" LLL*Ci&.
i-= = —.
4-.-C-
r---4r�'-
ZO,
00-01
0001,
iz
C-C
cow,
� L
A=LL L LL w
-go
;6*x
u Ou
3z
� lwq
Im
I Ell
V ,D
(z'D
A Is
IV. D.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: Year XIII Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) Budget
DATE: March 11, 1987
A public hearing to consider a proposed budget for year XIII
of the CDBG Program has been scheduled for March 16, 1987.
Notice of this hearing was published in the Edina Sun - Current on
March 4, 1987.
Edina's allocation for year XIII of the program is
$140,679. Staff has prepared the following budget for City
Council consideration. Except for the Comprehensive Plan project
this budget reflects projects which have been-funded for some
years. Staff is suggesting that $10,000 be allocated to staff
time and materials to update the graphic elements of the
Comprehensive Plan. The graphics of the Plan need to be updated
to conform to the text changes adopted in 1986. All other
projects represent continuing programs. The Rehabilitation of
Private Property project would provide funding to repair and
rehabilitate single family homes in the City. The Architecture
Barriers project would provide funding to implement our plan to
make all public buildings and facilities accessible to the
handicapped. The assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing
project would be available to assistance in construction of new
housing in City. At this time there are no pending proposals for
new housing. However, it is important to keep the project active
in case a project is proposed during the budget period. The
Public Services project would continue our funding of the
H.O.M.E. program of South Hennepin Human Services Council. It
would also provide funds for the delivery of surplus food to
distribution locations in the City.
Activity Budget
Rehabilitation of Private Properties 40,000
Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000
Public Services 20,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000
Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 30,679
TOTAL 140,679
i
Since the preliminary budget was prepared we have received
two specific requests for funding. First, the H.O.M.E. program
has requested a year XIII funding level of $13,000.00. For the
past several years we have provided $8,000 per year for this
project. Attached to this memorandum is the request from
H.O.M.E. and also a summary of their activities. This increased
funding level was discussed during last year's budget hearings.
We have also received a request from Hennepin Economic
Resource Organization (HERO) for $7,033 from our year XIII
allocation. A letter from the chairman of HERO explaining the
request and the HERO business plan are attached for Council
review. According to the business plan HERO will provide job
training and job retraining to disadvantaged and dislocated
residents of suburban Hennepin County. All communities in the
Urban Hennepin County CDBG program have been asked to contribute
5% of their year XIII allocation to HERO. The money would be
used to purchase a building for the project. Our funding would
be secured by a lien against the facility. A member of the Board
of Directors of HERO will be present at the hearing to further
explain the request.
If the Council decides to fund the HERO project staff would
suggest the following budget. A resolution by the Council will
be necessary to send the proposed budget to Hennepin County.
Activity Budget
Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000
Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000
Public Services 20,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000
Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 23,646
HERO 7,033
TOTAL 140,679
Serving Bloomington,
Eden Prairie, Richfield
and Edina
Ili, !x"911 I P111 L11 F111
Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly
March 3, 1987
Mr. Craig Larson
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Craig: -
I am writing to you in anticipation of the upcoming hearing on
Year XIII CDBG allocations. H.O.M.E.'s success in providing
in -home services to Edina's older residents is largely due to
the CDBG program.
H.O.M.i=. formally requests a $13,000-- allocation from Edina's
Year XIII CDBG program. This amount is equal to the sum of last
year's two allocations made by Edina to H.O.M.E. We will need
this level of funding again to keep H.O.M.E. services,to Edina's
low and moderate income elderly vital. Federal and county
funding is tenuous. The Metropolitan Council funding will cease
as of January 1, 1988. On the other hand, requests for service
continue to increase. Elderly residents are finding in -home
services an attractive alternative to long term care facilities..
Attached is H.O.M.E.'s 1986 record of service to elderly and
disabled individuals in the 4 -city area. Totals for Edina show
that we provided 135 households with a total of 3,281 hours of
direct service. Through our small jobs program we provided a
variety of ongoing minor maintenance repairs, including roof
repair, caulking, toilet and faucet repair, carpentry and the
seasonal tasks of lawn mowing and snow removal to 90 households.
In addition nine homes received major maintenance assistance,
primarily in the form of exterior painting. We also provided
general housecleaning on a regular basis to 32 residences. Our
active client list (homes served in the past 18 months)
currently numbers over 180 households and 200 customers.
Our efforts to reach Edina's low and moderate income households
also increased in 1986. We are regularly attending the surplus
commodities distribution site to ensure that the elderly who use
that program are also aware of H.O.M.E. We find that
individuals who use surplus commodities are often in need of
additional community services. Our contact with the Energy
Assistance Program has also intensified. As a result a majority
of the low income elderly who use EAP also use the H.O.M.E.
program to maintain their households.
South Hennepin Human Services Council Creekside Center
9801 Penn Ave. So. Room 100 Bloomington, MN 55431 (612) 888 -5530
Mr. Craig Larson
Page 2
March 3, 1987
We appreciate Edina's past support of H.O.M.E. We believe
alternative care to seniors is an economical and socially sound
concept. We will continue to do all we can to see that Edina's
elderly are able to live in their homes for as long as they
choose to do so.
Sincerely,
teem, \A,
Don Hauge
H.O.M.E. Maintenance
Coordinator
DH:sa
Enclosures
H.O.M.E.
(Household and
Outside Maintenance for
Elderly)
1986
Maintenance
Homemaker
Total
BLOOMINGTON
of Customers
225
103
327
# of Households
155
72
227
# of Jobs
906
1,341
2,247
# of Hours
2,869
3,176
6,045
EDINA
_ -
# of Customers
119
56
175
of Households
- 90
45
135
T of Jobs
622
745
1,367
# of Hours
1,586.5
1,694
3,281
RICHFIELD
# of Customers
139
36
172
# of Households
102
31
131
# of Jobs
665
436
11101
#.of Hours
1,880
1,045.25
2,925
EDEN PRAIRIE
# of Customers
11
5
16
# of Households
8
3
11
# of Jobs
13
46
59
# of Hours
295.75
136
432
MPLS.
# of Customers
1
2
3
# of Households
1
2
3
# of Jobs
1
23
24
# of Hours
3
65.25
68.25
TOTAL
# of Customers
495
202
697
# of Households
356
153
355
# of Jobs
2,207
2,591
4,798
# of Hours
6,634.25
6,116.5
12,751
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR YEAR XIII
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRA11
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of .a Joint Cooperation Agreement
with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in.the Urban County Community
Development Block Grant Program, and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban
Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant
funds was developed consistent with program rules:
Activity Budget
Rehabilitation of Private Properties $ 40,000
Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000
Public Services 20,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000
Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 30,679
TOTAL $140,679
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council approves the proposed use of Year
XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes
submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen
Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of
Funds.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 1987, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of March, 1987.
City Clerk
IV.D.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner
SUBJECT: CDBG Assistance for Summit Point
(formerly Woodhaven)
DATE: March 13,_1987
The sponsors of Summit Point (29 unit senior citizen project
at Vernon and Summit Avenues) have requested $11,208.34 in
assistance to cover unbudgeted construction shortfalls. This
funding would be used to purchase furnishings for the community
room and office and for the construction of a traffic control
island at Interlachen and Summit Avenue.
Three reasons are given for the shortfall. First, during
construction the Fire Department ordered changes which amounted
to $8,100.00. Monies set aside for furnishings had to be used
for this change order. Second, the City is requiring the traffic
island to prevent left turns from Summit west bound on
Interlachen Boulevard. The 3,750.00 cost of the island was not
budgeted. Finally, installation of a monitoring system for the
emergency pull cord system will cost $1,672.00.
Money to fund this request is available in our year XII
Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Project. Funds
would be provided to the east Edina Housing Foundation which
would provide the assistance to Summit Point. This is necessary
because of HUD regulations covering assistance to Housing
construction.
Tenants are in the process of moving into the building now.
It's fully rented with a waiting list of 140 for this 29 unit
project.
Woodhaven Non - Profit
328 West Sixth Street
Saint Paul, Minnesota
March 12, 1987
Mr. Craig Larson
East Edina Housing Foundation
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Housing Corporation
55102
Re: Financial Assistance for Woodhaven /Summit Point Apartments
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Larson:
The Woodhaven Non - Profit Housing Corporation
respectfully requests financial assistance in the amount of
$11,208.34 to cover the cost of community room and office
furnishings, landscaping, and emergency pull -cord monitoring at
Woodhaven. Copies of the invoices and estimates are attached.
The reason we are requesting this assistance is because
Woodhaven had to pay $8,100.00 to cover the costs of additional
fire equipment in the building. This $8,100.00 came from the
Contingency that would otherwise have been used to purchase
furniture and pay for the cost of the monitoring system for the
emergency pull -cord system in the apartment building.
Additionally the City has required us to do landscaping where
Summit and Interlachen meet at the end of the driveway to improve
traffic circulation. This cost was an unexpected addition to the
construction at Woodhaven.
I appreciate your willingness, and thank you in advance
for this assistance. Please contact me at 291 -1750 with any
questions you may have.
Sincerely,
"#�b7
Mary S. (Muffie Gabler
Executive Vice President
Woodhaven Non - Profit Housing
/jlk
Enclosure
cc Ms. S. Dore Mead
Mr. Ben Sweazey
Ms. Pat Butler
Mr. Bob Faloon
Corporation
pY; PYA /Monarch, I3tilc.
FOODSERVICE DISTRIBUTORS
January 23, 1987
wES'rMINSTL•'R CORPORATION
328 West 6th Street
St. Paul, MN 55102
Attn: Pat Butler
Thank you for the opportunity to quote on the above items. We sincerely
Dope you will favor us with this valued order.
l''i r \ /T`fONAItC}i , INC.
LENNY b ROBIN MAZUREK (i/(
Contract Sales /Design Department
LRM:ch
P. O. BOX 9452 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 • PHONE:(61 2) 542-1725
SPECIFICATIONS - (FURNISHINGS)
I.
Twenty (20) ea. 114550 Stack Chairs, light oak finish, fabric
seat and
back @ $98.50 ea., as follows:
(10)
ca. Upholstery 11473
(10)
ea. Upholstery #477
$1,970.00
I'2.
Eighteen
(18) ea. 11TL4LA Stack Chairs, chronic finish, fabric
seat y:td
back 00450 (navy) @ $46.00 ea.
828.00
3.
Five (5)
ca. Oak Tables 42" square with 2" square outside
leg mount;
finish to match bannister oak - $204.00 ea.
1,020.00
4.
Three (3)
ea. 36" x 72" Folding Tables, light oak finish
@ $59.00
ea.
177.00
Sub -Total
$3,995.00
Freight Charge (estimate)
467.40
TOTAL - FURNISHINGS
$4,452.40
RECAP:
'total of Furnishings $3,995.00
Total of Supply Items 697.94
Total Freight Charges (estimate) 513.40
GRAND TOTAL $5,206.34
TAX EXEMPT 0: 29729
Thank you for the opportunity to quote on the above items. We sincerely
Dope you will favor us with this valued order.
l''i r \ /T`fONAItC}i , INC.
LENNY b ROBIN MAZUREK (i/(
Contract Sales /Design Department
LRM:ch
P. O. BOX 9452 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 • PHONE:(61 2) 542-1725
NEW WE SELL FOR
AND SHIP RENT SERVICE
USED FROM LEASE PHONE
ail
FURNITURE STOCK BUY 6454534
2295 UNIVERSITY AVE., ST. PAUL, MN 55114
t�1L tll.�., ll,r,,ar�r
►►l "V�!! l!n _ 'iii�i il;
Sold To
.WESTMINSTER CORP
328 W. 6TH STREET
-ST. PAUL, MN 55102
ATTN: PATRICIA BUTLER
INVOICE N0. 76929
DATE 12/31/86
YOUR ORDER NO.
Shipped To
Our Order No.
Salesman
Tr.rms
F.O.U.
Date Shipoed
Shq)petl /,,I
DOUG
NCT 30 days
12/31/86 I
Our- truck__
Duanlily
Order,rd
Ouanlily
Sh,pped
—
Stock Number /Deseriplion
Unit P, ir,e
—
Ilrul
— -__
:.nun nu
1
1
8773 VIRCO adj. table - blk /walnu-1,
89.0(
1
1
534CPP HON 4 -dr legal file - blk w /lock
139-0
2
2
502 CAPRI shack arm chairs - brn fleck
29
00
58.0
1
1
used 30 x 60 desk - blk
225.0
1
1
used blk exec. swivel
59.0
570.0
delivery
10.0
58
.0
CLAIMS
TRUTH IrJ LENDING DISCLOSURE
Claims !or defective merchandise must be made vrithin 10 days after receipt
This invoice is clue on the 70th day following invoice dale as specified by pa
of w.vrchand,sr. D:o rne,chandise may be returned for creclil unless by Written
nlenl terms. If not paid in full by ilia 30th day the Purchaser expressly agre
Authority from this C)Ifice. All returned merchandise must be shipped to us
that a one.. percent (1 %) par month (Annual Percenu,ge natr, of 12%) la
Prepaid. All claims for clarnaged merchandise delivered by commercial carrier
charge shall be added to this account computed on the unpaid balance un
must be filed :within the delivering carrier. Merchandise orrlerecf in error is
the account is paid in full. Purchaser agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fe
subject to 25% handling and restocking charge,
and other costs incurred for collection.
March 10, 1987
MAR 2 1
Westminster Corporation
328 West 6th Street
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
Attention: Muffie
Re: Woodhaven Apartments
Dear Muffie:
Enclosed, please find my price for adding a concrete island
at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Summit
Avenue, per the enclosed sketch.
Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty ( $ 3,750.00)
I have included the following:
1. New curb and gutter.
2. Saw cut and remove bituminous.
3. Raise existing manhole.
4. Patch blacktop at island.
5. $ 500.00 landscape allowance.
6. Installation of seven (7) street signs.
7. No permits will be required from the City of Edina
or Hennepin County.
If you have any questions, please, do not hesitate to call.
Very sincerely yours,
_LOVERING ASSOCIATES, INC.
00-'J o aj�
Dave Anderson
Project Engineer
DA:dp
cc: Pete Johnson - Trossen /Wright Architects
Lovering Associates in
General Contractors
1600 East 78th Street
Minneapolis, MN 55423
(612) 869 -5545
I
DRAINAGE 9 UTILITY EASEMENT PER
(I PLAT OE INTERLACHEN POINT-TOWpIIiOMES
—BAST LIPIE OF 61_IZK 4
- 19.3 Z I ` S /
v ti
• L
WEST LINE OF
SUMMIT AVENUE
�— - .. GAS
p � "I PFOt :.SED It +GhE55 8 - • -�_°D W ,� �
EGHESS EASEMENT ��; Ak
kq
% - CENTERLIN Ok SUMMIT AVENUE TWZE LAND CAl$J14Ctc 't �
L ^NTIM r)YirRIFY W /EXlsr,
r
NORTH 1 76. 16 6-- , M. N • I PKO V I o�
AVEQL)A1f CLC -AKn:
'
Fog fUTURI . CUKG
S - - -
! r t
FU TV R E
Cowc. CUKo r y`� c
n, �YWR PEAK )�J� �'� �F -� i ►1 N /
C . (TEM poKAY- KEl�tO
wF lE►.I CUtze IS o�;�;;:,: I '►) 9sS.5 /.
K E A 11•J � t,i �� O w
cil
t�1•��T NONT► {EAtY_ v 1 • fix`
t'ON OF LOT 32 /
. - t- -. == p9� - -. . �`i�w Tom` =1`t�' • /'��`�- �
u.
cir,6 '
Ox
• 111
4 b
Estimate for Emergency Pull Cord Hook Up
March 12, 1987'
K & R Electronics for Wiring $ 240.00
Floyd Security - Monitoring Panel $1,432.00
TOTAL $1,672.00
HERD
Hennepin Economic Resource Organization
IV.D.
4150 Multifoods Tower • Minneapolis City Center a Minneapolis, MN 55402 • (612) 227 -0001
February 24, 1987
Edina
Dear Mayor:
In response to your community's scheduled March 161 1987 public hearing on Urban
Hennepin County community development needs and proposed uses for your allocation
of $140,679 from the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County grant, the Board of Directors
of HERO - a non - profit small business accelerator facility - are asking for the
inclusion of a request for $7,033, an amount representing 5 percent of your Year
XIII allocation, in your local community development program.
We have enclosed a copy of the HERO business plan and a list of the initial board
of directors for your information. As described in the business plan, the
requested CDBG fund will provide the resources necessary to purchase a facility to
have a self - sustaining employment generating small business center to provide
long -term employment to disadvantaged and dislocated who are. residents of suburban
Hennepin County. It is the project's goal to serve as a model for the creation of
job opportunities through focusing of employment opportunities, job training and
education programs and employee -based support services at a single location.
The investment of CDBG by yours and other communities within the Urban Hennepin
County program will be secured by a lien against the facility, payable to the
program should the HERO projects fail.
Should you have any questions /concerns regarding HERO or this specific request,
please feel free to contact me at 227 -0001.
A member of the HERO board of directors will be attending the March 16, 1987
public hearing to make a brief presentation and address any questions you or your
staff may have concerning the HERO request.
Sincerely ours,
f -
Robert S. Arthur
Chairman of-the Board
cc: Community Development Staff
A Non - Profit Corporation
The corporation has been launched by four individuals, who have committed time
and energy over the past f if teen months to developing this initiative, with
the anticipation that they will add to their ranks as HERO goes forward. They
are listed here in alphabetical order.
ROBERT S. AR3MR, now with American Electronics Association, has worked as an
executive for the Gallup Organization, The Psychological Corporation,
Computech, Inc., and Control Data Corporation. Since 1958, the focus of his
career has been on computerized information services. He has also been
extensively involved in the creation of self- supporting non - profit
corporations for societal goals. In energy conservation in 1980 he was the
founding chairman of the board for the Natural Resource Corporation. He is
chairman of the board for the Stillwater Data Processing Systems, Inc.,
organized in 1975 in the maximum security prison. He has served on the
Hennepin Private Industy Council since 1979, both as member and twice as
chairman, and also serves as chairman for the advisory committee of the
Minnesota Supported Employment Project. He is chairman of the board for HERO.
DANIEL C. FRUM has served on the Hennepin Private Industry Council as a
member since 1984, and will again assume the chair in March, 1987. He has
held positions in Human Resource & Manufacturing with the Toro Company,
Whirlpool Corporation & Litton. Prior to creating his consulting and
executive recruiting business, he was director of Human Resources at CTS -
Fabri-Tek. His interest in creating work opportunities for the disadvantaged
stems from his services as Metro director, as a loaned executive, with the
National Alliance of Business.
IIAIA : Her business career has included eight years as manager of the
Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce. In October, 1986, she became
communications director for Health Central, a health care management company.
During her career with the Chamber of Commerce, she initiated and organized
the development of a hundred and seventy six unit housing project. Initiated
and lead a group of northern suburban municipalities in forming a Convention &
Tourism Bureau, and assisted in the relocation of businesses to Brooklyn
Center. She also has served as a member of Hennepin Private Industry Council,
the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Executive Board, Anoka- Ramsey Community
College Board and initiated and served on the board of the Anoka County
Mediation Project.
JOYCE D ORBDCH: Self - employed consultant to individuals and small
corporations in areas of personal employment issues. Lecturer and teacher on
job skills & resume writing. Staff persona and facilitator for Eating
Disorders Program at Methodist Hospital. Group leader for Red Cross Child
Care Course. Former director & organizer of Golden Valley Youth Employment
Services. Member of Hennepin Private Industry Council. Active community
volunteer.
W
BUSINESS PLAN: HERO
CPJUnMG JCBS
FCR
THE BCX�+I�IIC11i.LY DISADVAiID'AG®
AND
7M BOQ " IICULY DISLOCATED
1 •1:: •!' •b: :�' •;'
:E •
;oil wio-
1:10
1/15/87:FSA:05
:I;r�;.• 1' •� 11 i 1 11�.`1�'a' •• 11 MI
WHMMS, the Hennepin County Private Industry Council recognizes the
importance of promoting economic development opportunities which result
in the creation of suitable jobs for economically disadvantaged persons;
and
WHEMM, the Hennepin County Private Industry Council has participated in
the preliminary development of the Hennepin Economic Resources
Organization (HERO) for the purpose of promoting a small business
incubator /accelerator facility;
WHEREAS, further development of EDP is dependent upon the creation of a
capital budget and operating fund;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Private Industry
Council allocate $15,000.00 to a development fund, contingent upon
acceptance of the HERO business plan, to be used to finance fund raising
activities; and
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the Planning and Evaluation subcommittee
review the HERO Business Plan and make a recommendation relative to
acceptance for ratification by the Council at the March 1987 meeting.
Business Plan: Hero
1,/15/87: RSA: 05
-1-
The need exists in a rapidly changing society to provide opportunities
for those working who are "disadvantaged ", and those who have been
"dislocated" by these changes.
People within these two groups can be defined quite specifically.
"The disadvantaged individual" is a person through a combination of
factors such as: low educational attainment, lack of orientation to the
work environment, insufficient vocational skills, and physical, mental or
emotional disabilities, has difficulty in finding and keeping a job.
"The dislocated worker" is an individual who after a period of productive
service -loses his /her job due to lay -off. This dislocated worker
experiences difficulty in finding new employment because of lack of
suitable job opportunities, obsolete skills, age and lack of familiarity
wl-%h job seeking techniques.
Because the manufacturing section has been massively impacted by both
off -shore resources as well as robotics, the extent of this economic and
industrial transformation has produced the term "rust bucket state."
While this term has not been applied to Minnesota, the impact is present
and vividly proven in the situation of the taconite industry in northern
Minnesota.
The restructuring process is also represented in more recent industrial
developments, such as computers and telecommunications. This industrial
group has a significant role in the state of Minnesota, since the state
ranks number six in number of electronics employees among the states. In
the last year, the employee roster in electronics in the United States
dropped by two percent or fifty thousand jobs. This has been represented
in the Twin Cities, and in Hennepin County, by significant layoffs and
restructuring on the part of Control Data Corporation, Honeywell and
Unisys, as well as many small electronics corporations.
There is now a sizable body of dislocated workers placed along side those
who are "disadvantaged" and who have been struggling to qualify for an
opportunity in the market place represented by Hennepin County. The
constituency of the disadvantaged is calculated to be about twenty -five
thousand persons in 1986; "the dislocated.workers" being about five
thousand in 1986.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
-2-
7he very magnitude of the problem at the county level suggests that
training and retraining be regarded as only one response to the problem.
A second response is to create and sustain more job opportunities focused
on labor intensive products and services, where neither robotics nor
inexpensive overseas human resources can fulfill the need for specific
products and services.
The definition of the need, and an appropriate need response, is
complicated by the polarization of opportunity seen in the work place.
Professional opportunities requiring many years of education and special
experience are growing in the private sector. Opportunities for minimal
skills and earnings in various service functions are also growing. But
for both "disadvantaged" and "dislocated" workers, the broad spectrum in
the middle range is disappearing. This middle range of employment
opportunities includes skilled manufacturing and labor trades,
supervisory and middle management positions, para - professional and
technical jobs. In most cases, there is no way they can hope to enter
professional activities, and the alternatives at the other end of the
stele provide marginal economic resources for survival.
The need is for job opportunities in the middle range, for opportunities
requiring human abilities and skills rather than extended specialized
training, and for these opportunities to be developed more rapidly in the
immediate future here and now in Hennepin County.
Business Plan: Hero
1 /15 /87:RSA:05
MCC
Since the fall of 1985, this concept has been examined in the context of
a set of specific objectives. As a concept the idea of a Small Business
Incubator /Accelerator is not a novelty; there is a large body of
information about actual initatives: some successful and some not so
successful. However, many of the iniatives have been focused on new
start -up companies and oriented to "high technology" ner se. In many
cases, the work opportunities created have been very remote from the two
constituencies of critical need. High technology start -up companies have
a critical need for highly educated, highly motivated, young
professionals. Their need for the disadvantaged and the dislocated is
very limited.
Ili 'addition, there has been in many of these iniatives a heavy focus on
the facility itself and its attendant professional and support services.
In many cases, everything is provided from advice on the use of venture
capital to word processing capabilities. All of this activity, however,
may account for much less than fifteen percent of the budget expenses of
the small business. Consequently, many of these incubator facilities
have gotten into serious trouble, both those for - profit and those under
no-profit auspices; at least this is true for the record in the Twin
Cities. A soft market for commercial and industrial real estate has also
impacted initiatives involving this budget item.
By comparison, the cost of labor is, always, a large item in any
corporate budget; thus the concept here is not focused on facility, per
se, and management service, but rather upon access to subsidized human
resources, and its training. Moreover by training is meant not only
instruction specific and general but on- the -job work experience. HERO is
focused on providing human resources important to the corporate goals.
This is the first objective.
The second objective is to provide preferential opportunity to
corporations with labor intensive products and services, where numbers of
persons are needed to create the product or service, and where growth and
success of the business results in the demand for even larger numbers of
like persons. Exanples in the product area are provided by such business
enterprises as the processing of food items or the making of costume
jewelry. In the service area, illustrations are afforded by
telemarketing companies or messenger or courier services.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
-4-
The third objective is to incubate and accelerate newly established
businesses that are labor intensive. The emphasis is on growing more
rapidly corporations with a track record and a performance achievement
above average. HERO is not oriented to start -up in the first six to
eighteen months of corporate existence, for corporations who have yet, so
to speak, to win their spurs and establish market share. Thus, HERO is
oriented to both for - profit and not - for - profit corporations in the first
five years of their existence.
The fourth objective is to provide a specific facility, an appropriate
building, for new labor intensive businesses to grow more rapidly and
increase employment opportunities within Hennepin County, Minnesota.
While this facility provides adjunct business services, they are by
definition just that - adjunct business services.
Th-- twhole concept and the related
providing work opportunities for the
worker. It is focused on the hum an
rapidly changing society.
business objectives is focused on
"disadvantaged" and the "dislocated"
need and the human resource in a
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
HERO is proposed as a method to stimulate economic growth for the purpose
of creating jobs for disadvantaged persons and dislocated workers. The
establishing of a Small Business Incubator /Accelerator facility, provides
a partial incentive for employers who are potential creators of jobs for
the targeted populations.
The presence of the facility, however, is not in itself the factor which
will induce small business owners to create employment opportunities for
persons with barriers to successful job performance.
Other incentives, such as training programs designed for the specific
needs of individual employers, wage subsidies and tax credits, are
available through publically funded programs.
I*.'Hennepin County, an abundance of effective programming exists which
can be used to assist developing employers to create jobs for the
disadvantaged and the dislocated worker.
Resources to assist the employer and the prospective employee include:
federal job training funds from the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA),
state wage subsidy monies from the Minnesota Employment and Economic
Development (MEED) Act, wage subsidies through AFDC grant diversion,
specifically developed training programs through the Hennepin Technical
Centers and other training institutions, and pre - screening of potential
employees by professional employment and training staff under contract to
the County.
Although federal and state funds for the above activities are available
in lesser amounts than in past years, the County's Employment and
Training system continues to develop new funding sources. Recently
programs have been developed through federal and state grants to provide
re- employment services to workers dislocated from the Control Data
Corporation. Programs for workers who have been dislocated, have
recently been implemented in the County.
There has been continuous federal support for employment and training
efforts for several decades. This support rises and declines in relation
to economic conditions and the level of unemployment. These fluctuations
in the dollar level of support notwithstanding, initiatives such as
described in this plan can gain access to funds which may be used to
increase the employability of the disadvantaged and the dislocated
worker.
BUSINESS PLAN: HERO 1/15/87:RSA:05
-6-
LOCUION OF THE FACILITY
& BASIC auXERIA
Since the Hennepin County is a geographical entity on the map, with
certain demographic characteristics descriptive of the two constituencies
"disadvantaged" and "dislocated ", an informed judgmental decision was
possible regarding the target area for searching for an appropriate
facility.
This area is bounded on the north by HWY 694, on the south by HWY 494, on
the east by HWY 100 and on the west by HWY 18. More than three dozen
buildings have been inspected and rejected for one or more reasons.
However, it does not appear that basic criteria are overly stringent, and
the situation has developed of having two or more buildings that
represent serious fully qualified possibilities. 7he experience to date
strongly suggests that a number of appropriate buildings exist and it is
a business decision as to which one should finally be selected for the
incubator /accelerator facility.
There are three set of criteria that need to be met by the building and
its location. The first relates to the corporate tenants, the second to
the prospective business employees from the two designated constituencies .
of need, and third set profiles the characteristics of the facility.
CORPORATE TENART CRITERIA: Since the emphasis is on labor intensive
products and services, the business has to identify the facility as
providing easy and speedy access to its customers and clients. It has to
be well situated in terms of the highway system in the county. It must
provide an opportunity for easy handling of shipments in and shipments
out, in specific terms such as loading docks. There must be free parking
for customers and visitors. The utilities must be inexpensive and
appropriate to labor intensive activities involving a variety of
different kinds of equipment. There must be security for employees at
all hours, as well as products and equipment. Finally, there has to be
access to adjunct services, such as bookkeeping and word processing, at
competitive market rates.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
-7-
EMPLOYEE CRITERIA, IN TERMS ESPECIALLY OF THE DISADVANTAGED AND
DISLOCATED: It follows that the facility can not be remote from
concentrations, for example of the "disadvantaged." The target area
designated relates to these concentrations in the county. Not only is
distance critical, public transportation has to be accessible and
available for the facility. Free parking for employees, with
transportation, is also critical. There has to be some viable
relationship to fast food and shopping resources, especially for single
heads of household. By the same token, child care resources are planned
for the facility to be managed on an independent basis. Finally, the
facility will house resources oriented to training and counseling those
employees with the need.
FACILWY PILES IN TERM OF BASIC (1tiTERIA.
Since the focus of the iniative is on the human resources, corporate
tenant criteria and employee criteria have been dealt with first.
Ne.'ertheless, certain basic parameters have been developed which relate
to the size of the facility, and the level and extent of the activity.
These criteria are not absolute, but relative and clearly numbers which
represent an order of magnitude. First, it is planned that the facility
has at least thirty thousand square feet of net rental space. This means
that common areas are excluded, such as restrooms, corridors, reception
area and administrative offices, from the estimated square footage.
Second, it is thought that the tenant population will be in the range of
fifteen to twenty corporate tenants. Thirdly, an energy efficient
building is necessary in the state of Minnesota. Fourth, the plan is
presently for a flat rental fee of three dollars per square foot, which
includes utilities, taxes, insurance along with management charges. It
has to be repeated that the market in Hennepin county for commercial and
industrial space is highly competitive and likely to become more so in
the foreseeable future. Quality space is widely available in the three
to four dollar range. The fifth consideration is that the building be
available for purchase, or acquisition and /or use on a nominal fee basis.
The sixth criteria is that the facility be in an attractive and visible
location, and finally it must be as already indicated viable in terms of
highly competitive market alternatives.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
-8-
The initiative is unique in its focus on human resources, but it has to
be perceived to be so, and seen as truly focused, in practical terms, on
the needs of both the disadvantaged and dislocated worker. Subsidized
training, education assistance and work experience are the themes which
must explain the initiative and produce the appropriate level of funding
and support.
There are four distinct considerations in terms of funding. First, money
has to be found to pursue this iniative. Second, money or support, has
to result in the acquisition of an appropriate building or facility.
Third, money must be available for building modifications or renovation.
Fourth and finally, there has to be an appropriate operating budget which
allows the iniative to become self - supporting.
YOW TO PURSUE INIATIVE: At this poin in time, the Private Industry
Council for Hennepin county has passed a resolution to provide fifteen
thousand dollars seed money if the final plan is approved by ccgmdttee
and the council as a whole. If the council decided not to approve, the
option would still exist to seek support in this amount from a private
corporate foundation in the Twin Cities. A great deal of work has
already been done, but this money would support development activity over
an estimated twelve month period.
This initial budget has to support over a twelve month period HERO
communication (written and telephone), documentation (budget and
funding), information (demographic and vocational) presentations-(slide
and hand -outs) and travel to obtain immediately the funds needed and to
create for the immediate future an informed participative and supportive
network throughout the camtmnity.
MONEY TO PURCBASE A FACIWTY: There are a number of options to raise the
approximately four hundred and fifty thousands dollars required to buy an
appropriate building. It should be noted that there are a number of
other possibilities that provide the same or a better outcome. First, in
terms of options requiring money and then, second, in terms of options
not requiring a purchase price.
MONEY OPTION: !ME FIRST OF THESB IS REPRESFl RED BY CCHM Uff DEVE OEMW
BLOCK GRANT FUNDS: This can take the form of a grant, or a no interest
loan. By way of illustration, twenty thousand dollars a year from five
conounities can be sought; involving such communities as St. Louis Park,
Golden Valley, Hopkins, Edina and New Hope. This involves, of course,
getting the support of interested and responsible persons in each of the
designated catmmnities.
Business Plan: Hero 01/15/87:RSA:05
0
-9-
The second option, which is relevant, is that Henne2in County might
provide the immediate purchase price through using the unexpended balance
from the discretionary account as related to the Community DevelomLent
Block Grant Funds.
UNFUNDED OPTIONS: These apply only to the acquisition of the building or
facility as such. The first of these has already been explored with one
corporation; it involves the corporation turning over the building for a
nominal sum and taking the tax write -off. A second option is the
outright gift of a building by an individual or corporation. A third
option is that HERO takes possession of a building for a five year period
at nominal cost, with an option to buy in the future. Obviously, an
unfunded option has relevance for this iniative since it allows focus on
the much more modest budgets related to modification and /or renovation,
and critically the operating budget. It is intended to preservere with
these options. However, the unfunded options represent, in combination,
only about a ten percent possibility.
ICY TO MODIFY A FACILITY: The first option is that the money will come
from a start -up grant from the Minnesota Department of Energy and
Development. This is difficult to reference except in relationship to a
specific building, but it is estimated not to exceed one hundred thousand
dollars. The second option is that this money will come from a grant
f rom the Federal Economic Development Administration. This second
approach requires the active support of both the Minnesota Department of
MerW and Develg=nt and the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training.
MONEY TO STAR -UP THE FACILITY: The first option is to seek start-up
monies in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars from again the
Minnesota Department of Energy and Development and /or the Federal
Economic Develoment Administration. The attached pro forma budget
assumes that almost twenty -five thousand dollars will be lost in the
first year of operation, but in subsequent years the operation will show
a positive deviation in excess of thirty thousand dollars in 188, 189 and
190 and be self- supporting thereafter. The money sought is therefore
seed money only.
In terms of start -up monies, it
covered by the seed money granted
fourth in the budget pro forma fo r
after the second year.
Business Plan: Hero
is important that contingencies be
to HERO since it is planned as set
the initiative to be self - supporting
1/15/87:RSA:05
1
1e
� w
-10-
V•J Iti y' .�4�h' •' V :I: :I:r I:r• 1 :+••. • 1 •+
HERO exists as a legal entity, as a 501 C 3 Corporation in the state of
Minnesota. It was created by two members of the Private Industry Council
(PIC) , with the advice and suggestions of several other individual
members.
If the council as a whole approves the developmental budget of fifteen
thousand dollars, a board of directors will be selected and elected. In
any case, persons willing to serve will be identified, but a board will
not be constituted until an initial grant is approved.
In parallel with the process of seeking the approval of the PIC,
presentations will be made to the Minnesota Department of Energy and
Development as well as the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training to
seek their reaction, input and active support for funding of the
operating budget.
If this support is forthcoming, an approach will then be made to the
Federal Economic Development Administration for a modification and
renovation budget related to a specific building. The timing of this
approach is contingent upon finding a suitable building.
Again in parallel with the PIC activity and the initiative with the state
agencies, continued efforts will be made to identify a building which
will not require raising funds from the communities to buy the facility.
Only if the unfunded alternatives fail completely to produce an
appropriate building in an appropriate location will the communities be
approached for funds, through the Community Development Block Grant
Funds. They will be approached, in any case, however, in terms of
explaining the initiative and seeking their active participation and
support.
In summary then, first a planning and developmental budget will be sought
fray the Private Industry Council by March 1987. Second, an operating
budget will be sought from the two designated state agencies. Third, a
building will be obtained, preferably through "an unfunded mechanism."
Fourth, the Federal agency will be approached for renovation and
modification dollars. Fifth, the active support of the communities will
be sought. Finally, it is anticipated and planned that these activities
will consume the better part of 1987, to produce a successful outcome.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
t
-11-
Three immediate objectives are represented for the HERO facility upon
support and funding being completed. These are first to achieve an
annual rate of two thousand and fifty thousand qualified man hours or the
approximate equivalent of one hundred full -time employees and sixty
part -time employees, identified as "disadvantaged" and "dislocated"
workers. Second, for the incubation to be fully operational within three
months of obtaining possession of the building. Third and lastly to
complete the first twelve months of activity and not incur a deficit in
excess of twenty -five thousand dollars, and then to move on to a positive
deviation in the second year of activity.
Business Plan: Hero
1/15/87:RSA:05
{
-12-
:y
1ST MONTH: Development final draft of business plan.
First presentations to state and federal
agencies.
2ND MONTH: Initial grant approved by Hennepin PIC Committee.
First presentations to communnities and county.
3RD MONTH: Initial grant approved by Hennepin PIC.
Further presentations to state and federal
agencies.
4TH MONTH: HERO board members and officers elected.
Network support activities initiated.
5TH MONTH: Final presentations to communities, as well as
state and federal agencies.
6TH MONTH: Final selection of appropriate building from
short list.
7TH MONTH: Final funding approved by communities, county,
state and federal agencies.
8TH MONTH: Solicitation of prospective tenants.
Implementation of T.E.A. interface.
9TH MONTH: Final acquisition of appropriate building.
Building changes and modification.
10TH MONTH: First tenants move into facility; intensive
publicity regarding IMM start -up.
11TH MONTE: Implementation of funded training and work
experiment activities: further publicity and
marketing.
127H MONTH: Revision of budgets and projects based on first
quarter activities.
Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05
REOUEST FOR PURCHASE
VI. A.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - City Engineer & Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 13, 1987
Material Description (General Specificati n 11
Contract 487 -4 (Eng) - Lift Stations Remodeling - Improvement No.'s 87 -3 & 87 -4
Lift Station No. 4 - W. 41st St. between Monterey Ave. & Lynn Ave.
Lift Station No. 5 - Corner of Grimes & Inglewood Ave.
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Pipeco CL.ztracting
2. Richmar Construction
3. G. L. Contracting
4. D. H. Blattner & Sons
Department Recommendation:
Funded from Capital Plan
Amount of Quote or Bid
$49,899.00
$55,560.00
$65,640.28
$70,700.00
Pipeco Contracting $49,899.00
i
Engineering & Public Works
Signatur Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ✓
is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
John lallin, Finance r for
City nager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
nneth Roslar@, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI. B.
-TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: March 13, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Traffic Paint
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Ouote or Bid
1• Vogel Paint & Wax Co. $5,255.50
2. Earl F. Anderson (County Bid) $5,763.00
3. Gopher Sign $6,400.50
Department Recommendation:
Vogel Paint & Wax Co. $5,255.50
r
Publ i r Wo kG
Siegnaturwo Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is -/ is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
n uv�, (oo
ohn Wallin, Finance D' a or
City MAager's Endorsement:
/ 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative: /, ,1 11�7
Ken*bth Roslan&,fity Manager
1
. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: TED PAULFRANZ, FIRE CHIEF
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: MARCH 12, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Reconstruction of 1977 Pumper - -
,Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc.
2.
3.
Department Recommendation:
Recommend award of bid to C sto Fir 'A'ppar tus
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is is not
Signatulre
VI.C.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$77,850.00
FTRF
Department
/��nwithin the amount budget for the purchase,
/�/onry 4ku ., �It �rprh OL`kOkr�i.5 ✓Y�lot� ._.
e' /vt� �'or arc (� r} fKI x
9
c,J
John Wallin, Finance Director
City nanager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
i Vi. C.
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE.: March 12, 1987
'rn: 1 "en Rosla.nd, City Manager
FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fl-re Chief
SUBJECT: Reconstruction Bid - -- 1977 Pumper
I have reviewed the bid documents and specifications for the above - referenced
project. It is my recommendation that the City Council award the bid to Custom
Fire Apparatus, Inc., for $77,850.00.
Because of the special concerns surrounding this bid, I have asked the Fire
Department Staff to re- examine our "reconstruction program "; specifically, the
specifications, future plans and other options. In arriving at my
recommenc- ition, I have asked the following four questions that are central to
this issue:
1. Why_is the work needed at_this time?
There is little doubt that we are overdue in attending to the serious
corrosion problems involving this pumper. This is not just cosmetic
rust. corrosion is attacking and destroying the load- supporting elements
of the vehicle body, resulting in additional and unnecessary damage. Tools
and equipment cannot be carried in some of the compartments because floors,
doors and latching parts are not reliable. The vehicle cannot continue in
first -line service without special attention. We do not have reserve or
back -up vehicle and reliability is of.prime concern. Our original plans
called for this work to be undertaken Last year. Funds were not available
at that time.
2. Do the specifications exclude or eliminate other bidders?
Our specifications are complete and thorough. we expect bids to meet
specifications; however,'we anticipate and provide for exceptions. There
are very few references to specific brand names, and where so referenced,
such equipment is available to all manufacturers. The specifications
provide a level of standardization necessary for safe and effective
operation with minimal training time. It is important to point out that
the specifications are the result of and reflect our experience, both good
and bad. With these specifications, we are attempting to avoid known
problems (i.e., corrosion) and to secure advantage of new improvements.
It is not our purpose to exclude bidders.
3. Why -_did we receive only one bid?
This reconstruction work is somewhat unique and, as such, we have few
interested companies in a quite limited area of manufacture -- -that of fire
equipment. We sent the bids to five known manufacturers in two states. The
last time rae took bids on this type of work (1985), we had two interested
romnanies. These two have since combined. I believe the work has limited
interest because of additional costs, risks and warranties associated with
rebuilding an older vehicle.
Memo: 1977 Pumper Reconstruction
March 12, 187
Page 2
4. why is the bid $13,000 over estimates_
Our estimate of $65,000 was based on the previous work completed in 1985.
The estimate did not take into account numerous (30) additional
improvements provided for in the specifications. Of special note is the
use of stainless steel and a new crew cab design not considered in 1985.
Clearly, one of the reasons for rebuilding the vehicle is to take advantage
of such improvements in materials, design and equipment. Naturally we can
justify each based on cost benefit, safety or operations effectiveness.
Our purpose in this reconstruction program is to secure the value of a new
vehicle at approximately half, the current cost. The bottom line is that an
equivalent new pumper would cost $155,000 to $165,000. we estimate the
existing vehicle to be north approximately $35,000.00. As such, this proposal
remains the best alternative.
TRP /ras
VII. A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian;
SUBJECT: Vierkant's Proposal For Yard Waste
Composting In Edina Morningside
DATE: March 13, 1987
Vierkant Disposal presently provides the refuse collection
service to the Edina - Morningside residents. Vierkant Disposal
offers their services to the residents on a twice a week basis
ad has been doing so since the City -of Edina discontinued
contracting this area.
Vierkant Disposal wishes to implement a yard waste
composting program for the Edina - Morningside Area this spring.
The yard waste composting program will be implemented utilizing a
separate truck which will circulate through the Edina - Morningside
-area collecting bags of yard waste. The contents of the bags
will be loaded into the truck and transported to the Hennepin
County composting site. This collection will be done at no
additional cost to the Edina - Morningside residents.
Vierkant Disposal believes they can cover the cost of this
service by the reduction in their landfill tipping fees resulting
from the diversion of yard wastes from the landfilled refuse.
However, to keep the cost of collection of yard waste down,_..
Vierkant Disposal is asking that yard wastes be placed at the
curb to reduce their labor costs. Gary Vierkant has asked to
appear before the Edina City Council on Monday, h1arch 16, 1987 to
seek approval by the Council.
Attached is a copy of the flyer Vierkant Disposal will use.
I would suggest that reference to containers for yard wastes
other than the trash bags be removed from the flyer.
Also, Janet Chandler has attached information relating to
composting of yard waste for the Edina City Council information.
COMPOSTING
The volume of garbage from a community can be significantly reduced by diverting
yard wastes (leaves, grass clippings) into a composting process. Hennepin County
estimates that yard wastes make up .9% of the waste stream. In Edina this
amounts to over 4,500 tons a year. Since most householders bag leaves and grass
clippings separately from garbage; a compost collection program could be
relatively easy to accomplish.
In otter to encourage composting, Hennepin County is informing trash haulers
that they may bring yard waste to the county's composting sites at no cost.
In turn, trash haulers are planning how to implement separate yard waste pick -up
for their customers.
Materials brought to the composting site would be designated to a certain area
so that the tonnage can be "credited" to the city of origin. For example; in
the Fall of 1986 Edina delivered 220 tons of leaves to the compost site from the
city street cleanup. Any increase in compost tonnage will help Edina qualify
for a greater percentage of funding from Hennepin County for our Recycling Program.
Funding is available for net costs of recycling programs as shown below:
50% funding for 0 to 5% reduction of waste stream _
60% funding for 5% to 10% reduction of waste stream
70% funding for 10% to 16% reduction of waste stream
80% funding for greater than 16% reduction of waste stream
Edina qualified for 50% funding for 1986. I hope we will be eligible for 60% in 1987.
Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator
r-
w ti ;
;!;
ERNEST A. VIERKANT
VIERKANT DISPOSAL
COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL
March 6, -1987
TO THE CITIZENS OF THE EDINA- MORNINGSIDE AREA
9049 XERXES AVENUE 30.
MINNEAPOLIS. MN 29410
►MONKS 931.1909
We at VIERKANT DISPOSAL would like to propose a
compost- recycling project for this neighborhood.
Due to the high cost of landfilling, we would like to
separate all leaves, grass and garden debris from the
.r"ibbish. Brush and tree limbs cannot be included as
-they will not be accepted by the compost site. Leaves
etc. would thus be hauled separately to Hennepin County's
composting area at no additional charge to $rou. This
could either be done with plastic bags or cans or any
other proper containers. We would like the materials
placed at the curb.
Our truck would be in the neighborhood between the hours
of .6 :00 AM and 9 :00 AM on Mon., Tues., Thurs., and Fri.
Any returnable containers used for this will be put back
at the proper place with the rest of your rubbish contain-
ers or a place of your request. Pickup may also be expanded
to Wed. and Sat. on request or weather interference. If
this service is used it should eliminate extra charges for
maximum overages per rubbish pickup.
We at VIERKANT DISPOSAL, appreciate your patronage and.
trust that you will cooperate with us on this matter.
Very truly yours,
Vierkant Disposal
VII. B:
Consent
Agenda
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: BEER LICENSE RENEWALS
DATE: MARCH 12, 1987
The following businesses have applied for renewal of licenses for the year
April 1, 1987 to April 1, 1988, which in accordance with Ordinance No. 902
require approval by the City Council before renewal licenses can be. issued:
On -Sale Beer Licenses Off -Sale Beer Licenses
Biltmore Bowl
Braemar Golf Course
Bravo! Italian Specialties
Corelli's Pizza & Pasta
Dayton's Food Service
Camelot Golf Course
Donaldson's Minnesota Room
Edina American Legion Post
Edina Golf Dome
Ediner Restaurant
Empress Restaurant
Jerry's Foods
Original Pancake House
The Pantry
Southdale Bowl
St. Louie Rib Company
Szechuan Star Restaurant
T.J.'s Family Restaurant
Edina Superette
Holiday Stations, Inc.
Kenny's Market
Red Owl Country Store
Superamerica Station
I would recommend that the Concil approve these renewals, subject to final
clearance and approval by the Police Department as not all applications for
renewal have been completely processed as of this date.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER L�
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK __ r'Y�
SUBJECT: TEMPORARY ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE - OUR LADY OF GRACE
DATE: MARCH 13, 1987
An application has been received from Our Lady of Grace Church for a
temporary 3.2 On -Sale Beer License for May 2, 1987. The application has
been approved by the Police Department.
VII.0
Ordinance No. 902, Sec. 14(b) states "Not more than two (2) such licenses
shall be issued to any one corporation or organization in a calendar year,
and there shall be at least ninety (90) days between the license issue dates ".
Our Lady of Grace Church was issued a temporary 3.2 On -Sale Beer License
for a church function (square dance and dinner) for February 7, 1987.
Because ninety days will not have elapsed between the two events, a letter
has been submitted asking that the Council grant the license and waive
the 90 -day interval requirement. A.copy of the letter is attached.
This should be placed on the March 16 Council Agenda for action by the
Council.
MICHAEL J. O'ROURKE
ATTORNEY AT LAW
COMMERCE BUILDING
PHONE
SUITE 201
(612) 888-0534
8200 HUMBOLDT SO.
OR
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431
(612) 888 -9453
March 3, 1987
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City Clerk
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street-
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Our Lady of Grace
3.2 Permit
Mexican Orphanage Festival
Deer Ms. Daehn: -
I am sending this letter in connection with the application
of Our Lady of Grace to obtain a permit for 3.2 beer sale at
the May 2 Mexican Orphanage Festival. It is my understanding
that approval of the application will require a waiver of the
90 day interval which is called for by the Ordinance.
The first Application was made on behalf of the parish in
�_7 'g� connection with its annual square dance. The Festival is
being held at Our Lady of Grace but for the benefit of the
Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. St. Patrick's Church is
also a joint sponsor with Our Lady of Grace. I don't know if
this is a distinction which is meaningful in relation to the
letter and intent of the Ordinance, but it does account for
the close proximity of these events. In other words, the May
2.event for the benefit of the Mexican Orphanage is being
held on a timetable established by the Friends of the
Orphans, rather than in accordance with the agenda of Our
Lady of Grace.
We are hopeful that the Council will grant the permit and
waive the normal 90 day interval. I would be most happy to
supply any additional information, and make an appearance
before the Council if that would be of any benefit.
Thank you for your consideration of our request.
You very tru y
Michael J. O'Rourke
cc: Joanne O�Neill
Bob Bowler
License 'No.
Date February 24, 1987
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
APPLICATION FOR LICENSE
UNIVERSAL FORM
Name of Establishment Our Lady of Grace Church
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Address 5071 Eden Avenue 55436 Phone No. 929 -3317
Zip Code
Type of License Desired Temporary On -sale 3.2 Beer License - May 2, 1987 Mexican Fiesta
Description of Operation Dinner - Mass - Children's Program - Games.
Jointly sponsored by Our Lady of Grace, St. Patricks and
Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. (Charitable gambling exemption
applied for separately.)
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED UNLESS ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.
dame of Manager Robert Thomas Cassidy
First Full Middle Last 30.00
(Person directly responsible for operation)
5071 Eden Avenue 929 -3317 0310"T
Address of Manager Phone No.
Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year) 6/14/30 `l
References: (1) Name Robert W. Bowler Phone No. 929 -5405
(Local)
Address 5721 Bernard Place, Edina," MN 55436 -
(2 ) Name Robert W. Lannan , Jr.-
Address 4118 Sunnyside Rd. , Edina, MN
Phone No. 920 -2305
55424
Owners (if corporation, list principal officers):
Name (1) Birthdate
First Full Middle Last Month, day and year)
Address Phone No.
References: (1) Name Phone No.
'_ocal )
Address
(2) Name
Address
Phone No.
17, - z,,;
Dept.
Approved
Date
`
i Police
65
(�
Fire
Health
Building
Planning
i
Park
Council
City M r
Clerk
Address 5071 Eden Avenue 55436 Phone No. 929 -3317
Zip Code
Type of License Desired Temporary On -sale 3.2 Beer License - May 2, 1987 Mexican Fiesta
Description of Operation Dinner - Mass - Children's Program - Games.
Jointly sponsored by Our Lady of Grace, St. Patricks and
Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. (Charitable gambling exemption
applied for separately.)
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED UNLESS ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED.
dame of Manager Robert Thomas Cassidy
First Full Middle Last 30.00
(Person directly responsible for operation)
5071 Eden Avenue 929 -3317 0310"T
Address of Manager Phone No.
Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year) 6/14/30 `l
References: (1) Name Robert W. Bowler Phone No. 929 -5405
(Local)
Address 5721 Bernard Place, Edina," MN 55436 -
(2 ) Name Robert W. Lannan , Jr.-
Address 4118 Sunnyside Rd. , Edina, MN
Phone No. 920 -2305
55424
Owners (if corporation, list principal officers):
Name (1) Birthdate
First Full Middle Last Month, day and year)
Address Phone No.
References: (1) Name Phone No.
'_ocal )
Address
(2) Name
Address
Phone No.
17, - z,,;
r'
Application For License
r.
Page Two
Name (2) Birthdate _
First Full Middle Last (Month, day and year
Address
References: (1) Name
(Local)
Address
(2) Name
Address
Phone No.
Phone No.
Phone No..
Name (3) _Birthdate
First Full Middle Last Month, day and year
Address
References: (1) Name
(Local)
Address
(2) Name
Address
Phone No.
Phone No.
Phone No.
Has the applicant, or if the applicant be a partnership, the partners, or if the applicant
be a corporation, the principal officers and managers, and the named manager ever been
convicted of a criminal offense other than a traffic offense? NO
If so, state the information as to the time, place and nature of such offense:
I, being duly sworn on oath, depose and say that the statements herein are true to the best
of my knowledge and belief. I have read and understand all laws and ordinances pertaining
to the operation of the above listed establishment in the..City of Edina. It is agreed to
notify the City Clerk in writing within 48 hours of any changes of the above listed personnel.
I understand that any payment submitted with this application will be promptly deposited by
the City, but such deposit shall not constitute ac ptance of the appli n y the City and
the applicant must meet all requirements for the 1' ens% prior to iss nce.
Date February 24, 1987
License Fee Enclosed $ 30.00
Signed and sworn to before me, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Minnesota,
County of Hennepin, as to
thisS day o February, 1987
.v Gam,
pplicant's signature
Manager's Signature
6ikea A1. Zc=
H"nepin Cwjnty
wrr My Cam. Exp,114M
vII.D.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Leslie Turner and Gordon Hughes ,
SUBJECT: MARCH 21, 1987, STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP
DATE: March 13, 1987
Attached for your review and use are: 1) the proposed March 21, 1987,
agenda; 2) the adopted Mission Statement; and 3) a "thought organizer"
to help you prepare for the workshop.
We will be glad to answer questions concerning these. items at the
March 16th Council Meeting.
LT, GH /sw
Attachment
4
A G E N D A
MARCH 21, 1987
STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP
8:00 - 8:45 Overview of Strategic Planning Process
Review Successes of Past Year
8:45 - 10:30 Identify Issues Facing the City in
next 1 -3 Years
10:30 Break
10:45 - 11:45 Discussion of Issue #1
11:45 Lunch
12:30 Discussion of Issue #2
1:15 Discussion of Issue #3
2:00 Subgroups Define Issues and Goals
and Possible Strategies
2:30 Subgroups Present Issues to Large
Groups
3:00 Evaluation (Council Only)
3:30 Adjourn
MISSION STATEMENT
THE ^IISSION OF THE CITY OF EDINA IS TO DO OUR PART IN MAINTAINING EDINA
AS A PREMIER COINIUNITY IN THE TWIN CITIES AREA.
Key Words
"Our Part." Many factr•rs contribute to Edina's success - -its schools, churches,
neighborhoods, and most of all, its residents. Our obligation is to do our
part; i.e. provide municipal services in a way that meets the standards
imposed by our constituency. If we do our part well, others will follow
our example.
"Maintaining as Premier." Premier means second to none. Edina has earned
the reputation of being a highly desirable place to live and work. We will
strive to maintain that reputation, guided by the following values:
Efficient and Effective Municipal Services. We will strive to provide the
most appropriate municipal services to the community. We will scrutinize new
programs or services before implementation to determine if they are most
appropriately provided by other governmental units or if they can best be
provided by our residents themselves or by private enterprise.
Fiscal Responsibility. We believe in a conservative approach to government
spending. We also believe that Edina should be principally responsible for
the generation of its revenue which results in a government which is most
responsive to its citizens.
Balanced Land Uses.
investment in single
including commercial,
opportunities for all
complete community of
We place a high value on protecting Edina's enormous
family homes. We also favor a diversity of land uses
industrial, parkland and open space as well as housing
segments of the population, in order to provide a
the highest standards.
Metropolitan Citizenship. Edina is part of a larger community and as such
will participate in metropolitan issues, influence metropolitan policies
and assume a reasonable share of metropolitan obligations consistent with
our principles of local control.
Volunteers. Citizen participation is a key element in effective local
government. One of our greatest assets is our informed and involved
citizenry whom we will continue to involve in all practical aspects of
the governmental process. _
Investment in Infrastructure. Maintenance of our public facilities in sound
condition makes economic sense by avoiding costly replacement and inefficient
operation. Furthermore, it encourages a similar investment by the private
sector. Therefore, we will strive to maintain our infrastructure through a
program of capital planning.
Innovation. Although we are not a business organization, we believe the
City should operate in a business -like manner. Creating value in our
services is important. Therefore, we must continually pursue better ways
to provide quality services to create greatest value for our citizens.
Human Resources. We recognize the importance of attracting and retaining
outstanding employees. We will, therefore, strive to be an employer who
provides a challenging and rewarding work experience.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 26, 1987
Edina City Council
Strategic Planning Workshop
"Thought Organizer"
A. Review the Mission Statement. Underline what you believe to be priority
areas.
B. List four situations or trends that you have observed in the community or
elsewhere that you believe will or is impairing our ability to carry out
the mission.
1.
2.
3. .._
4.
C. Do the same for those external situations that you believe are supportive
of our mission performance.
1.
2.
3.
4.
D. Now think about the City organization itself (staff, facilities, finances,
management, attitudes, etc.) and list four things you observe as making
achievement of mission more difficult.
1.
2.
3.
4.
Page t
E. Do the same for those internal situations you observe as being a real
plus in terms of our mission performance.
1.
2.
3.
4.
F. Now review all of the above and extract the four issues that you believe
are most critical to our future success. Could be either weaknesses to
correct or strengths to build on.
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
- Priun-�2@i
G. For each of the four items you identified as most critical, jot down a
few ideas as to what we might do about it.
Issue 1
Issue 2
Issue 3
Issue 4
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227 -8017
P. 0. BOX 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 288-3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612) 475 -0373
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415-9200
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340 -2600
TELEX 29 -0605
TELECOPIER: (612)340 -2868
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
(612) 340 -2659
Ms. Marcella Daehn
City of Edina
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
March 13, 1987
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
8 THIRD STREET NORTH
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406) 727 -3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III
550 NORTH 31- STREET
P. 0. BOX 1179
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406) 252 -3800
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
011 331 562 32 50
Re: Amendment to Homart Settlement Agreement
Dear Marce:
I enclose herewith a letter to the City Council
and Ken Rosland relative to the above referenced amendment,
extending the time for the I -494 study by six months.
Will you please put this in the packet for the City Council.
Very truly yours,
Thomas S. Erickson
TSE:jd
enclosure
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101
(612) 227 -8017
P. O. BOX 848
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507) 288 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475 -0373
350 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022
(212) 415 -9200
VII. E.
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Partnership Including Professional Corporations
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
201 BUILDING
(612) 340 -2600
B THIRD S TRE ET NORTH
TELEX 29-0605
GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
TELEOOPIER: ( 612)340 -2868
(406)727 -3632
304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III
550 NORTH 31- STREET
P. 0. BOX 1179
THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A.
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(612) 340 -2659
(406) 252 -3800
30 RUE LA BOETIE
O
March 13, 1987 7
75008 PARIS, FRANCE
Oil 331 562 32 50
Honorable Members of
Edina City Council and
Kenneth E. Rosland,
City Manager
4801 West 50 Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Homart Settlement Agreement
Gentlemen:
The Settlement Agreement between Edina,
Bloomington, Homart and the Metropolitan Council provided,
in part, that that Council would undertake a study of the
I -494 corridor. That study was to be completed within
eighteen months from the date of this agreement, that is,
by May 15, 1987. The City has now received a request from
the Metropolitan Council for an amendment to the Settlement
Agreement extending that eighteen month period to twenty -four
months, or until November 15, 1987. The amendment will
have to be agreed to by all parties, i.e., Edina,
Bloomington, Homart and the Metropolitan Council. That
agreement is now being circulated among those parties.
If that extension is acceptable to the City Council, I
recommend that a motion be adopted approving such six -month
extension, subject to the approval of all of the other
parties to the Settlement Agreement, and authorizing the
Mayor and City Manager to sign such an amendment to the
Settlement Agreement, again subject to execution of that
same amendment by all of the other parties to the Settlement
Agreement.
Very truly yours,
Tho as S. Erick on
TSE:jd
VII. F.
M E M O R A N D UM
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: DEER
DATE: March 13, 1987
At their last meeting, the Council asked for an update concerning the deer
population study. Last November, we reported that the Department of
Natural Resources suggested that an aerial survey be conducted to estimate
the present deer population. This survey would provide the basis for
their recommendations as to a control program. As you know, the DNR is
ultimately responsible for any control measures.
Successful aerial surveys depend upon adequate snow cover (without such
snow cover, it is difficult to spot deer from the aircraft). Because of
the unusual winter, John Parker, the area wildlife manager, reports that
an aerial survey was not possible.. Apparently, there is no other
feasible method of assessing the magnitude of the deer proglem. Therefore,
I'm sorry to report that we seem to have no alternative than to delay the
project until next winter.
GH /sw
IX. A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: STATE LEGISLATION
DATE: March 13, 1987
Attached are seven policies that I will.discuss with you on Monday night.
The reason for this fast action is that our lobbyists feel that we must
get to the State Legislators quickly . regarding these seven items. Also
ati sched is some supporting information regarding these proposals..
There will be a special meeting of the MLC Board of Directors on March
25th at which time we want to give our City Council's input.
KR /sw
Attachment
C
MUNICIPAL
LBUSIATIVE
1500 Northland Plaza
3800 West 80th Street
Bloomington, Minnesota 55431
(612) 893 -6650
MLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SPECIAL MEETING
Wednesday, March 15, 1987
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 50th Street, Edina
5 :00 -- 6:00 p.m.
AGENDA
Policy 1 The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) opposes the
Governor's 1987 Property Tax Proposal.
(Although portions of the Governor's Proposal could be
supported standing alone, in aggregate the proposal should
not be adopted by the Legislature.)
Policy 2 The MLC opposes any legislation which would extend the
sales tax and motor vehicle excise tax to local units of
government.
(This proposal is estimated to cost local units of
government $46.4 million annually.)
Policy 3 The MLC supports legislation which would expand
Minnesota's present sales tax base item s .
(This policy would accomplish two important objectives.
First, additional revenue could be raised whi:': could be
used for additional property tax relief or other budget
items, such as eliminating the sales tax on local units
of government. Second, an expanded base would result
in more stability in state government finance. Please
see the enclosed attachment.)
Policy 4 The MLC supports legislation which would impose the 6%
sales tax on the wholesale price of gasoline. The funds
raised from this tax would be dedicated to the trunk
ighway tund or would be used to replace the lost revenue
due to the transfer of the motor vehicle excise tax from
the general fund to the trunk highway fund.
MLC Special Board Meeting Agenda
March 25, 1987
Page Z
Policy 5 The MLC opposes any changes in the appropriation and /or
amount of homestead credit dollars going to local units of
government.
Policy G The MLC supports legislation which retains the appropria-
tion for local government aid (LGA) at its current level.
Should LGA payments be reduced, the reduction should be
proportional.
Policy 7 The MLC opposes all-four property tax reform components
proposed by the Coalition of Outstate Cities.
(This includes the tax base equalization, commercial
property tax credit, distressed area industrial credit,
and reduction in agricultural land values.)
M
EXPANDING THE MINNESOTA SALES TAX BASE
FACTS: Minnesota's state sales tax was enacted at a 3% rate in
1967 and was increased to 4% in 1971. The 4% rate re-
mained intact for 10 years. Then on July 1, 1981, it
was "temporarily" increased to 5 %. On January 1, 1982,
the 5% rate was made permanent and the rate was
"temporarily" increased -to 6 %. The 1983 Legislature
made the 6% rate permanent. Minnesota's current 6%
rate is the third highest state rate in the country.
Connecticut imposes the highest state rate of 7.5%
and the State of Washington is second with a 6.5%
rate. Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and
Rhode Island all share the 6% level with Minnesota.
Minnesota's state sales tax accounts for about
$1.4 billion in tax revenues each year. This compares
with an annual yield of about $2.6 billion in income
taxes and $2.2 billion in net local property taxes.
In addition, the 6% rate is also placed on motor vehicle
sales which garners $225 million in state revenues per
year. The general sales tax accounts for about 1/3 of
all state general fund tax revenue.
Forty -six states presently impose a sales tax on their
citizens. Twenty -eight states exempt food consumed
at home, and all but two states exempt prescription
medicine. However, Minnesota is only one of nine
states that extends the medical products exemption
to non - prescription items, and is one of only five
states that exempts clothing_ Each of Minnesota's
neighboring states taxes clothing. Few states have
extended their sales taxes broadly to services. Only
six (including South Dakota and Iowa) have taxed
services broadly. Minnesota does not impose a sales
tax on gasoline. Ten states do impose such a tax.
Thirty -six states, including Minnesota impose a sales
tax on cigarettes.
The table below shows
Additional items. It
could be reduced to
neutral (1985 figures).
the dollar impact on taxing
also shows how much the rates
make the broader base revenue
ON
Minnesota Sales Tax Base
Page 2
Gross Revenue Equal
$ Millions % Change Yield
Current Base $ 1,388 -- % 6.0%
Current Base Plus:
Food 259 18.7 5.1
Clothing 132 9.5 5.5
Personal Services 54 3.9 5.8
Business Services 172 12.4 5.4
Food and Clothing 391 28.2 4.7
Clothing and
Personal Services 186 13.4 5.3
Food, Clothing
and All Services 617 31.6 4.2
Gasoline 169 12.2 5.3
Clothing, Personal
Services and Gasoline 355 25.1 4.8
Clothing and Gasoline 301 21.7 4.9
Non - Prescription Medicine 10 .7 6.0
One major advantage of expanding the sales tax base is
the increased revenue stability that would occur. A
broader base increases stability in two ways. First,
spending activity on items such as food and clothing
tend to be relatively unresponsive or inelastic during
economic downturns compared to "non- essential" items
which are now taxed. A second means of enhancing the
revenue stability of the state tax system c►culd be to
adjust the intensity to which Minnesota relies on its
income taxes, i.e., broaden the sales tax base and use
to additional revenue to lower the income tax burden.
QUESTION: Should the State Legislature broaden the sales tax base
to additional items?
QUESTION: If yes, should the net effect be revenue neutral?
C
Minnesota Sales Tax Base
Page 3
MINNESOTA TAX STUDY
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Commission has found that due to the narrowness of its
base., the sales tax results in an unstable source of revenue for
the state, and it can contribute to budget uncertainty during times
of economic fluctuation.
In order to mitigate these problems, the Commission recommends
that the sales tax base be extended to include new clothing and
personal services. The stability, certainty and equity of the sales
tax are greatly enhanced by this change.
March 1987
Cities
Bloomington
Brooklyn Park
Burnsville
Eagan
Eden Prairie
Edina
Inver Grove Hts
Maple Grove
Maplewood
Minnetonka
Plymouth
Roseville
Shoreview
White Bear Lake
Woodbury
INCREASED TAXES TRANSFERRED
TO MLC CITIES
13,500
28,200 1,800 6,500 -- .90
Motor
191,400 5,400 4,508 1,272 .41
46,227
-- 10,293 4,051 -- --
Sales Tax
-- -- 1,487 354 1.0329
Vehicle
Premium
Premium
Mill
General
Sales Tax
Excise
Tax --
Tax --
Levy
Fund
Total
Tax
City
Employee
Incr
$180,000
$ --
$58,234
$19,419
$ --
--
139,912
1,080,000
15,875
6,907
--
.50+
91,800
156,600
36,000
6,600
--
.50
51,758
--
23,543
3,822
184
--
122,342
--
30,731
6,485
--
.17
27,900
--
2,700
2,775
--
.26
13,500
28,200 1,800 6,500 -- .90
48,600
191,400 5,400 4,508 1,272 .41
46,227
-- 10,293 4,051 -- --
15,706
-- -- 1,487 354 1.0329
March 1987
�s
IX. B.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland
FROM: Ceil Smith o/""
SUBJECT: SPACE STUDY
DATE: March 13, 1987
Attached is a memorandum and plans from,Foster Dunwiddie. This is a result
of Foster's work with our staff which we contracted for as a result of the
Space Study Committee commissioned by the City Council. Foster details in
that memo his recommendations which include an upgrading of certain areas
within City Hall and an addition to City Hal 1.` The addition to City Hall
and the completion of the Police Department can and should be addressed
during the Capital Long -Range Planning process.
The remainder of Foster's recommendations which include an upgrading and
some remodeling in the areas of Administration, Planning, Engineering,
Finance-and Assessing should be accomplished sometime during this calendar
year and include the following:
-,Carpeting throughout City Hall, including installation $24,945
- Wallpaper and paint for the upper level of City Hall 4,407
- Purchase of necessary modular office systems to 22,000
accomplish changes proposed by Mr. Dunwiddie
- Materials necessary to make electrical and structural 5,700
changes
TOTAL $57,052
I would recommend the funding come from the Capital Plan of which $40,000
has been budgeted for carpeting in the years 1987 and 1989, plus $10,000
budgeted and not used to complete this Space Study. I would also recommend
the remaining $7,000 come from the 1987 Contingency Budget. The voting
machine delay gives us the flexibility of moving some of the dollars about.
CS /sw
Attachment
r
cc: File
Rosland
Smith
Dunwiddie
Carr
March 11, 1987 MD8668
MEMORANDUM
Re: Edina City Hall Space Study
Edina, Minnesota
Fr: Foster W. Dunwiddie
For the past several months we have been analyzing the existing
and future space requirements for the City Departments currently
housed in the Edina City Hall. As a part of this analysis, we
have met with the various Department Heads to review existing and
future needs of each department, prepared schematic plans for
alterations and additions to the existing building to satisfy
these needs and finally, prepared cost estimates for the proposed
alterations and additions.
We have concluded from our analysis that there is sufficient
space within the existing building to meet current space needs of
the City with the exception of storage. There is a need for
providing adequate records storage and police property storage.
This need cannot be met within the confines of the existing
building.
Although there is adequate space within the the existing building
to meet the current needs of the City for office space, the space
is poorly arranged and inefficient in some areas. The present
layout has evolved over a period of years as a projection of the
planning patterns established at the time the building was built
in 1953. Fixed partitions, fireproof vaults, and remnants of
previous use patterns, all have served to restrict flexibility
and contribute to inefficiencies in the plan. For example, the
Finance Department and City Assessor occupy what was the original
City Council Chambers complete with raised dais, folding parti-
tion and chair storage. Similarly, fireproof vaults in the center
bay of the basement and first floors restrict flexibility and
adaptation to modern office planning.
There is adequate space within the existing building to meet
current needs if these remnants are removed and the City moves
toward an office systems approach to space planning utilizing
movable partitions and work stations. This has already been
started in the Building Inspections Department and to a lesser
degree in the Finance Department and City Assessor's Office. It
is our recommendation that office system planning be expanded for
use in other areas of the building. The advantage of office
system planning is to provide for more efficient work stations in
less space. They also lend themselves to rearrangement to meet
changing demands of City Departments at minimum cost.
March 11, 1987 - 2 - MD8668
To meet the storage needs of the City, we would recommend the
addition of storage facility on the southwest corner of the
building. This addition would serve both the needs for adequate
record storage and a Police Property Room.
The addition would have a brick exterior to match the existing
architecture of the building and is planned to permit future
expansion of the City Hall along the remainder of south side of
the building.
We would estimate the cost of the proposed addition would be
$195,000 including relocation of the existing electrical service,
fees and contingency.
Fwd: f wd
March 11, 1987
EDINA CITY HALL SPACE STUDY
EDINA, MINNESOTA
COST ESTIMATE
Addition - First Floor 1,440 sf
- Mezzanine 672
- Basement 900
Total 3,012 sf @ X45 /sf
Electrical Service Relocation =
MD8668
S 135,540
14,000
Exterior Demolition _ 10,000
Total Construction Cost = 159,540
A/E Fees and Costs 19,150
Contingency (10 %) 15,950
Total Estimated Cost = 1949640
To: Ken Rosland, City Manager
From: John Wallin, Finance Director
Subject: Advance Refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds
Date: March 16, 1987
During the last several years, the tax - exempt bond market
has experienced substantial changes in interest levels.
During 1985, the City sold a Tax Increment bond reflecting
market conditions at that time. The current market, with
substantially lower interest rates, now makes it feasible and
attractive for the City to refund this issue.
Advance refunding is the replacement of outstanding
bonds (the refunded bonds) with new lower interest rate
bonds (the refunding bonds). The procedure is as follows:
1. The proceeds of the refunding bonds are placed into
separate escrow accounts and invested in special treasury
obligations. The overall yield of these obligations is
Limited by arbitrage regulations to a rate "not materially
higher" than the true interest cost of the refunding bonds.
The true interest rate is different and lower than the
traditional new interest cost rate because the calculation of
the true interest cost excludes the cost of issuance. This
is a significant change resulting from the new tax reform
legislation.
2. The outstanding increment bonds carry a net interest
cost of 8.9% and the new bonds are projected to carry a net
interest cost of 6.2%. After excluding costs and making
calculations reflecting the timing of the payments, the
estimated true interest cost becomes about 6% It becomes
obvious that investment at 6% will not repay a like amount
carrying an interest rate of 8.9%. Therefore, an additional
amount of money must be put into the escrow account to
supplement the interest rate gap. This is part of what we
refer to as "front money ". In addition, the front money
includes accrued interest on the old bonds from their last
interest payment date to the date the escrow account is
established and the costs of issuance and underwriter's fees.
3. The investments in the escrow account are managed by an
escrow agent and as principal and interest on the refunded
bonds become due, the escrow agent makes the payment. The
maturity of principal and interest of the securities in the
escrow account are structured so as to provide funds in a
timely manner for payments of debt service of the refunded
bonds. Creation of the escrow account for the refunded bonds
discharges them as an obligation of the issuer and so at that
point they do not count as debt.
4. At the first date of call for the refunded bonds the
escrow agent calls all refunded bonds for payment and the
bondholders receive full payment for their obligations.
X. A.
5. The refunding bonds are paid from the same revenue
stream as the debt service of the refunded bonds was being
paid.
6. When bids for the refunding bonds are opened,
computations will be made as to:
... ......'.'. a. The amount of savings.
b. The amount of front money.
c. The availability and price of unlimited yield
securities.
d. The costs of issuance including the underwriting fee
.e. The permitted yield on the limited yield
investments. The amount of front money and total
savings is sensitive to changes in interest rates.
If the rate on the refunding bonds goes up both the
front money requirement and the level of savings is
reduced. Conversely, if the rate of the refunding
bonds is less, the front money and level of savings
will increase.
The City's 1985 Tax Increment bonds have a call
provision enabling the City to pay off the remaining
principal as of January 1, 1996. This would make it feasible
for the City to issue "crossover" refunding bonds.
In a crossover refunding situation, only those bonds
which are subject to prepayment under the terms of the
original issue ate refunded. The proceeds of the new
refunding issue are placed in a completely self - supporting
escrow account until the first call date, which is January 1,
1996. At that time, the proceeds of the new refunding issue
are released from the escrow account to pay off all the
outstanding bonds on the original issue. After that point,
the income the City is receiving to pay debt service on the
original issue crosses over to pay debt service on the new
refunding issue, it is at that time that the City begins
recognizing interest. cost savings resulting from the.
refunding.
i
848.71
__07S015 03/05_/87 72.00 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51
075015 03/10/87 17.29 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM SS 10- 4256- S10 -51
075015 03/05/87 104.68 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61
-- - - - - -- 193.97
i�
075018 03/05/87 13.50 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80
075018 03/05/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82
.7
* ** -CKS
* +* -CKS
1987 .
OF EDINA
CHECK .- . -ISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 1
--
CHECK
NO. DATE
_ AMOUNT
_ VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT__NO_. MESSAGE------.
(;
_,INV.._N_P__..0..
_M _
075002
03/05/87
20.40
AT 6 T
TELEPHONE
10 -4256- 510 -51
-__ 075002_
-
03/.OS/87
15_79
_. d
- 3-- 12-
36.19
+
"!
075004
03/09/87
6.00
AMERICAN LINEN
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 482 -48
075004
_ _. -- 03/09/87
_ __.- 147,,42
_
--------AMER _ _
LAUNDRY_.__ - --
10 -4262- 440 -44
075004
03/09/87
25.44
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
075004
03/09/87
113.50
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 520 -52
075004
03/05/87 _-
11_52
AMERICAN LINEN _ -
LAUNDRY
10-4E62-6e8-6e
075004
03/09/87
51.70
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
50- 4262 - 821 -82
075004
03/09/87
55.48
AMERICAN LINEN.
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 841 -84
075004
_03/-09/87-- _-
. -___ -- ___56.,26
AM9_RI _CAt!_LI_NEN_-
LAUNDRY
5.0_ 4262 - 861-.86-
_- ___.- __-- _- ______..__ -_
171
469.32
•
" ---
075005
03/10/87
_ 37.2S
AUDIO GROUP
ADVERTISING
50 -42 L4- 822 -82-
075005
03/10/87
37.25
AUDIO GROUP_
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 862-86
- -_- _ -_
74.50
•
_
'I
* * *- CK3
075008
03/11/87
-6-3..00
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
1 0- 4504- 646 -64_
075008
03/11/87
51.06
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
075008
03/11/87
39.01
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
075008,03
/11/87
_ "_ ",50_44 "-
_- KAMAN_BEARING_6_SPLY
REPAIR__PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
075008
03/11/87
11.20
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
_____._._
075006
03/11/87
35.69
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 664 -66
075008_
'_03/10/87 -
11.0_71,
KAMAN_BEARING -6 PL _Y
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248
075008
03/11/87
130.33
KAMAN BEARING & SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 802 -80
----- " -
491.44
- - - --
* * * * **
r ** -CK3
075013
_03/11/87
95_03
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10 =4504- 325 -30
1257____
075013
03/11/87
16.66
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
-_
1242
075013
03/11/87
168.92
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540-560 -56
59802
^•
07501303/11/87
79.30
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPA -IR PARTS
10 =4540- 560 -56
075013
03/11/87
45.00
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_59760
9522
075013
03/11/87
173.60
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
I„
59796
075013
_ 03/11/87
222.92
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 45_04 -_ 801 - 80__1260
075013
03/11/87
47.28
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 803 -80
1253
848.71
__07S015 03/05_/87 72.00 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51
075015 03/10/87 17.29 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM SS 10- 4256- S10 -51
075015 03/05/87 104.68 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61
-- - - - - -- 193.97
i�
075018 03/05/87 13.50 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80
075018 03/05/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82
.7
* ** -CKS
* +* -CKS
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -16 -87
PAGE 2
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M
MESSAGE
,
075018
03/05/87
12.25
AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50 -4256- 841 -84
,
075018
03/05/87
27.00
AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM
TELEPHONE
50- 4256 - 861 -86
075020
03/11/87
65.78
AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM
PARTS
10- 4620 - 560 -56
,
65.78 •
» » » » »»
r ++ -CKS
075025
03/11/87
31.00
ALFOkS-ANDERSSON S
ERVICES
27- 4201 - 662 -66
31.00 #
,
+ » » * +»
+ +r —CKS
075028
03/10/87_______
BEER _WHOLESALERS __INVENTORY
50 —_ 4630 - 822- 82_____________
075028
03/10/87
______._817.10 _
1,990.35
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
075028
03/10/87
1,635.95
BEER WHOLESALERS
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
4,443.40 +
« « + «s«
* ** -CKS
075031
03/10/87
12.08
----BERTELSON--BROS INC
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 133 -12
277385
075031
03/10/87
28.79
BERTELSON BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 140 -14
241255
075031
03/11/87
25.68
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 120 -12
075031
03/11/87
246.34
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 510 -51
075031
03/11/87
78.76
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 600 -60
075031
03/11/87
5.68
BERTELSON EROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 600 -60
075031
03/11/87
25.50—
BERTELSON BROS INC
CREDIT
10- 4516- 600 -60
371.83 +
** *—CKS
075033
03/09/87
75.00
_ BERGFORD_TRUCKING _
INVENTORY
SO-4626—See-8e.---------
075033
03/09/87
_
126.00
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -84
075033
03/09/87
118.50
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 86E -86
319.50 +
* * + * «*
+ ** —CKS
075038
03/11/87
100.00
GEORGE BUTLER
POLICE SERVICE
10- 4100 -420 -42
100.00 +
075039
03/10/87
449.24 -
bk YAW ROCK PROD. INC
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 643 -64
•
449.24
r » » » »*
r *+ -CKS
075047
03/09/87
4.10
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SPLY
10- 4508- 420 -42
92807
-,
075047
03/09/87
170.36
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLY
10- 4508- 420 -42
94034
075047
03/05/87
30.80
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLY
10 -4508- 440 -44
441495
205.26 +
+ * + » »»
+ *+ —CKS
I,
s i
I
1987 C. OF EDINA
CHECK F. jTER
03 -16 -87 GE 3
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITE DESC_R P N
ACC9.UXT_N.0__INV *_RO_M- MESSAGE_
10-4540 -560 - 56_.86851______-
_. -_____ -
075054
03/11/87
179.52
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
83897
075054
03/11/87
z'
075053 _ -
- -,- 03/10/87.
154.60____BROWNING_
PARTS
_FERRIS__-
__- RUBBISH_REMOVAL _
_1.0-
075053
03/05/87
70.42
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
28- 4250 - 702 -70
075053
03/05/87
113.17
BROWNING
FERRIS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
_
50- 4250 - 841 -84
075053
03/05/87
95_56
BROWNING
FERRIS
:UBB_I_$H� ELMO_VAL
5.(�425� @_61- @6 _ __ - --
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
433.75 s
10- 4540 - 560 -56
84077
075054
03/11/87 -- -
075054
03/11/87_
155.90- __ - - ---
_BATTERY_.
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR -PARTS
10-4540 -560 - 56_.86851______-
_. -_____ -
075054
03/11/87
179.52
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
83897
075054
03/11/87
241.44
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10-4540- 560 -56
87668
075054
03/11/87
38.21
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
87674
075054
03/11/87
51.37
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PAR TS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
85869
075054
03/11/87
67.28
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
84077
075054
03/11/87 -- -
378, -40
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS_
_10._4540 -560-56_.85065--
___- .- . - - -._.
1 075054
03/11/87
73.90
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
84519
075054
03/11/87
102.52
BATTERY
WAREHOUSE
REPAIR
PAR TS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
85376
-
1,288_54 •
_-
ssssss
.1 075058
03/11/87 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42
100.00 •
sss -CKS
I,-
ssssss sss -CKS
I -:
075060 03/10/87 12_4.31_ AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 04905
- . - - -- -- -- - - -.. __- - 124.31 s - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - i�:l
075061 03/05/87 76.20 "A" PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 50004 n
76.20
I"
4:
ssssss sss -CKS
075065 03/10/87 10.50 CULLIGAN CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 482 -48
I, 075066 03/11/87
s
75.00 CDP
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 540 -54 707686
75. 00 s -
075072 03/10/87 131.04 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 62890
075072 03/10/87 128.70 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 62S89
075072 03/10/87 147.08_ DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14
406.82 s
075073 03/10/87 29.10 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630_ -8 822 -82
075073 03/10/87 176.00 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84
075073 03/10/87 100.25 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86
"i 305.35
1�
3
] f.
Ms0***
075075 03/05/87 126.79 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12
075075 03/05/87 16.32- CLANCY DRUG INC CORRECTION 10- 4504 - 260 -26
4]
151,
]1
]4
sss -CKS ];I
7J
1 n`I
01
i°'1
n
sss -CKS 1,7;,
z'
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
075075
03/05/87
075075
03/05/87
075075
03/05/87
075075
03/05/87
I 075075
03/11/87---
-
075075
- _03/05/87_
03%05/87
075078
03/11/87
075078
_
03/10/87
075078
03/11/87
075078
03/10/87
075078
03/11/87---
075080 03/11/87
075080 03/11/87 - - --
075080 03/11/87
» * *rt »»
110.00
361.91
86.00
424.39 _
306.60
1,288.30 »
536.60
41.35
290.39
868.34 »
__COCA_COLA
CHECK
REGISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 4
AMOUNT _
VENDOR
CONCESSIONS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV_N P.O. 8 MESSAGE
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
_-
16.32
CLANCY
DRUG
INC
GEN SUPPLY
10-4504- 260 -26
- - - -- 16.32
- -- - - -
CLANCY
- -- - -
DRUG
INC
GEN SUPPLY
--- - - - - -- --
10- 4504 - 260 -26
2.59
CLANCY
DRUG
INC
GEN SUPPLY
- - -- - --------------- - - - --
10- 4504 - 420 -42
29.04
CLANCY
DRUG
INC
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 510 -51
3.7S __
_CLANCY
DRUG
INC
SHORT SUPPLY
10- 4508 - 120_ -12 �
33.52
CLANCY
DRUG
INC
PHOTO SUPPLY
16-
0- 4508 - 200 -20
212.01
-- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- -
-- - --
--
-- -- - - --
-
-- - -- » *» -CKS •'
075080 03/11/87
075080 03/11/87 - - --
075080 03/11/87
» * *rt »»
110.00
361.91
86.00
424.39 _
306.60
1,288.30 »
536.60
41.35
290.39
868.34 »
__COCA_COLA
BOTTLING____CONCESSIONS_
COCA
COLA
BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
COCA
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
_COCA_COLA_BOTTLING
INVENTORY
COCA
COLA
BOTTLING
INVENTORY
CONT -MINN
CONT -MINN
CONT =MINN
GEN SUPPLY_
CLEAN SPLY
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
28- 4624 - 703 -70
50- 4632 - 822 -82
50- 4632- 842 -84 --
50- 4632- 862 -86
2774504- 663 -66
27 -4512- 663 -66
27 -4624- 663 -66
075092 03/10/87 81.78 C b S DIST INC COMMODITIES 23-4642- 613 -61
81.78 #
075099
075099
075106
- *** -CKS
*** -CKS
- - - ** »-CKS --
03/10/87 - _ - — 39.50 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS _ 27- 4540- 664-66
03/10/87 43.90 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 25400
83.40 •
e
' I
— - - -- — ** »—CKS
03/11/87 100.00 DAHL—MR HILDING POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 42042_ -
100.00 * - - -- - - - - -- - - --
i'
075110
03/05/87
245.65
DAVIDSEN DIST INC
245.65 •
50- 4632- 842 -84
-
075114 --
-- 03/10/87
— 16.56
ld
TOOLS
10- 4580- 560 -56
16.56 »
I_
075125 —
_03/11/87
240.00
075125
03/09/87
99.75 -
10 -4504- 301 -30
075125
03/11/87
202.80
i'
DAVIDSEN DIST INC
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
* ** -CKS 'r
DELEGARD TOOL CO
-
TOOLS
10- 4580- 560 -56
49078
_-. -.- *** -CKS - 11:
h, e
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4504- 301 -30
16259_
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN $PLY
10 -4504- 446 -44
16231
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 540 -54
1618$
e
1987 k OF EDINA
CHECK . STER
03 -16 -81 AGE 5
CHECK NO.
DATE -
AMOUNT
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT_N0.- LNV.._M- P..O,_
N_MESSAGE._-
075125
03/11/87
451.50
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
16245
07S125_. -.__
_03/09/87 _
-- _ -__- ___ .__ 70. 00
- - -- _MERIT SUPPLY
- 10-4512- 440 -44.
16221
075125
03/11/87
35.40
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEAN SPLY
10 -4512- 540 -54
16199
075125
03/11/87
492.50
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
16200
075125
_03/11/87
492.50
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 -- 440 -44
075125
03/11/87
84.40
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
16257
075125
03/11/87
84.40
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540 -54
16160
075125_ -_ _.
_ 03 /11_/87629.52
MERIT_. SUPPLY .- ____--
._-- NEW._EQUIP__ __
_10 -4902- 440 - 44_16254____.___-
______.
075125
03/09/87
388.50
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SPLY
28- 4512 - 702 -70
16252
075125
03/11/87
336.00
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
40- 4544 - 802 -80
16161
075125 _ _ _03/11/87
-- _- _.___ -- 224.00
__- MERIT SUPPLY- -
PAINT
40- 4544 - 802 -80.
1.6201
075125
03/11/87
224.00
MERIT SUPPLY
PAINT
40- 4544 - 805-80
16258
075125
03/11/87
490.00
MERIT SUPPLY
WATER SUPPLIES
40- 4622 - 812 -80
16135
075125 --_03/1-
1-/87
_ 490. 00 -_-
_.MERIT SUPPLY_
5,035.27 w
075128
03/10/87
59.20
DAIRY HOME
CONCESSIONS
2S-4624- 703 -70
rrwsww
www -CKS
075131
03/09/87
335.00
ASPLUND COFFEE
CONCESSIONS
2B- 4624-703-70
08348
335.00 w
075132
03/09/87
76.00
PHYSIO CONTROL
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 440 -44
A16308
075132
03/09/87
294.70
PHYSIO CONTROL
1ST AID SPLY
10 -4510- 440 -44
370.70 w
wwwwww
wrr -CKS
075134
03/09/87
36.75
CITY WIDE SERVICES
CONT REPAIR
50- 4248 - 841 -84
36.75 r
rrwwww
wrw -CKS -
'
075143_-_---.03
/11_/87
_- - 13 -.3S
ENRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS.
_27 -4624- 663 -66
I"
r
j
075143
03/11/87
18.40
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
j
31.75
wwwwrw
www -CKS i]
_-
075162-
03/09/87
_ 321_66
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS -
27- 4540- 664 -66
62433
9:1
321.66 •
- --
- --
-- - - - -- o i
�
rwwwsw
+ ++ -CKS (�'a
075194
03/11/87
147.00
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 440 -44
74547
n-.
075194 -
03/1 1 /87
39_80
- GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10-4248-440-44
74662
;1
075194
03/09/87
29.96
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 440 -44
74244
"
075194
03/11/87
299.00
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
GEN SPLY
10- 4504- 440 -44
74595
515.76 r
rrrwwr
rrr -CKS �' <
rr
1987 CITY OF EDINA
AMOUNT_
CHECK NO.
DATE
I z
03 -16 -87 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE
48._71
— GOPHERS SHOOTERS—
075202
03/10/87
48.71 +
-__— — —_
03%11/87
--
9.127
075209
075206
03/05/87
075209
075206
03/05/87
I�
075206
03/05/87
- -- —
075206
03/05/87
504.90
075206
— 03/05/87
AMOUNT_
- - --
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
03 -16 -87 PAGE 6
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE
48._71
— GOPHERS SHOOTERS—
TARGETS
3
48.71 +
-__— — —_
03%11/87
--
9.127
075209
��
42.40
075209
03/11/87
10.92
I�
— — - - --
10.09
- -- —
03/11/87
_ +�+ -CKS In
504.90
G
6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30 ,.
__178.80 _
_ G
d_K SERVICES_
LAUNDRY
10- 4262— S60 -56
195.20
6
6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64
113.60
G
6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4512— S40 -54
210.50 _
G
6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
40- 4262 - 801 -80
1,203.00 +
- -
- - --
—46.57
075209-
03/11/87
^ 075209
03/1 1 /87
42.40-
075209
-__— — —_
03%11/87
--
9.127
075209
03/11/87
42.40
075209
03/11/87
10.92
075209
03/11/87
10.09
075209
03/11/87
2.00
075209
03/_11/87
19.15
-- 075209—
- -- 03/11/87 — — —
- -16.30 --
075209
03/11/87
16.60
075209
—
- 03/11/87
16.60
075209
03/11/87 -- --
-- - - 2.99 - - --
075209
03/11/87
14.53
100.00 +
164.87 +
+rt+rt ++
j -
075228- - - - --
' I
- ----------------------
+rtrtrt ++
075244 03/11/87
075245
075245
+ # + # ++
^i 075249
3 075253
I5�
•151 -.
03/09/87
03/05/87
03/11/87
03/11/87
253.96
253.96 +
-- 115.76
HAYDEN MURPHY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
__— 80_.60
ROBERT B HILL
_GEN SPLY
GENUINE
PARTS
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 646 -64
027544
27- 4504 - 662 -66
GENUINE_PART3
139.40 +
CREDIT_
_
-4540- 560 -56
''
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
_10
10 -4540- 560 -56
_02779
024779
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
026457
10-4100-420-42
GENUINE-PARTS
� __REPA_IR__PARTS
100.00 +
10- 4540 - 560 -66_-
024708
r
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
-- __
025347
—._.- _____-'
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
024800
GENUINE_PARTS
�c^
REPAIR
PARTS
10— 560 - 56_031493_
10 -4248- 560 -56
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
_4540-
10- 4540 - 560 -56
026718
h_'
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR
PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
072669
GENUINE
PARTS _
_REPAIR
PARTS
_10- 4540 - 560 -56
GENUINE
PARTS
TOOLS
10- 4580- 560 -56
_027562_
026711
GENUINE
PARTS
PARTS
10-4620 - 560 -56
024905
+++ —CKS •
HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y
REPAIR
PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
—
--
— — ++ +—CKS
50
-- 115.76
HAYDEN MURPHY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
__— 80_.60
ROBERT B HILL
_GEN SPLY
10—_450_4- 446-44
58.80
ROBERT B HILL
GEN SUPPLY
27- 4504 - 662 -66
139.40 +
''
+ ++ —CKS - -"
_— 100.00
WILLIAM HOFFMAN
POLICE SERVICE
10-4100-420-42
e3 \
Icy
100.00 +
G:1 �
�c^
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
26.50 +
h_'
+++ —CKS
1987 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 03- 16 -8', . -AGE
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N E6$AGE
' 075277 __... 03/09/87 — 610.00 PRINTING BIKE6—iFEEE�TY 1_�.2P 49- 00_Q =OQ- 3_7.82_ 4 �_._ .."_
1 610. 00 i - -- -- -
ii -CKS
110.34 - - - --
9I
iii -CKS
"
075289 03/11/87
10.00- WALTER JOHNSON CORRECTION 10- 4100 - 420 -42
__—
075289 03/11/87
10,_00 WALTER JOHNSON POL -ICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 =42
10- 4504- 646 -64
075289 03/11/87
100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42
I:cl
100.00 i
ii -CKS
iii -CKS
I"
°
075300
03/10/87
249_90
KOKESH ATHLETIC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
158.92
I:cl
��
34
249.90 i
iii -CKS 171
"
30
075317 03/10/87
1,000.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
S6
--
075317 03/11/87
80.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
!„
-- ±�!- CKS - - -
-,
�I
07S302
03/11/87
3,544.35
KUETHER DIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 822 -82
075302
03/10/87
3,463.00
KUETHER DIST CO
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -64
7,007.35 •
- -- —
:,----
rii * *� ---
---- - - - ----
-
--
-- tai -CKS -_ _.
075304
03/05/87
61.98
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646-64
494364
I]
_ 075304
03/10/8_7
38.05
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10-4604- 646 - 64_494522
1-
075304
03/10/87
63.90
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10- 4604 - 646 -64
494536
075304
03/10/87
50.73
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10 -4604- 646-64
494531
__075304
--
03/1 -0/97
13_50
—KNOX LUM @ER. CO
LUMBER
1,0 =4 4604_646_64
464418,
"
075304
03/10/87
43.21
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10-4604- 646 -64
494453
____•
075304
03/05/87
39.16
KNOX LUMBER CO
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
519645
_0753_0_4
03_/_09/87
19.91
KNOX LUMBER CO
PAINT
27 =4 4544 - 662 -66
494483
075304
03/05/87
18.91
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
494501
_
^"
075304
03/10/87
29.45
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SPLY
28- 4504 - 702 -70
494551
S1'.
_
378.80 i
ii « -CKS
„.
075311
03/10/87
1,661.55
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 822 -82
075311
03/10/87
2,535.00
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
;
075311
03/10/87
3,468.30
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 862 -86
7,864.85 i
'O
075315 03/10/87
158.92 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER SUPPLY
10- 4514- 520 -52
I4�
"_
158.92
��
34
•iii *�
iii -CKS 171
"
30
075317 03/10/87
1,000.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
S6
--
075317 03/11/87
80.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
!„
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -16 -87
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. Y
MESSAGE
1,081.33
t
-- t•
075318
03/11/87
97.80
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 440 -44
075318
03/11/87
11.55
LEEF BROS INC
LAUNDRY
27 -4262- 664 -66
109.35
t
i
sssart
str -CKS
075325
03/11/87
80.67
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
075325
03/11/87
20.67
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
101.34
sssrtrts
rtst -CKS
-
-
075329
03/05/87
- - -- - --
950.00
----- - --
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO
- - - - --
CONT REPAIRS
-- - - - --
40- 4e48- 801 -80
- -
lseee
-- - - - - --
-'
075329
03/05/87
4,790.00
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
15265
5,740.00
t
ssssss
tst -CKS
075337
03/11/87
1e.88
LAKE STATE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
P158es
"i
075337
03/11/87
21.68
LAKE'STATE EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10-4540 - 560-56
P155E0
srtssrtrt
sst -CKS
075343
03/11 /8— - - - --
47.3 4 - -
- - -
-- - M- I- N N E S OT- A - - -- G LO- VE
GE- N SUP- P-- L I E S
1- 0 --45- 0-- 4 - --3-01- - 3 0 -
-- - - -
11020
-- - - -- - -- '
'
075343
03/11/87
38.64
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
1144
85.98
•
075344
03/11/87
71.00
MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 449-44
,
0T5344__
03/09/87 _
— 50.00
MED OXYGEN _6 EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10-4274- 449_44
075344
03/11/87
3.92
MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
EQUIP MAINT
10-4274- 449 -44
075344
03/09/87
45.41
MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
1ST AID SPLY
10 -4510- 440 -44
170.33
+'
i
tttttrt
ttt -CKS '
675346
— - - —
03/10/87
— -- - - --
217,752.34
- -- - - — -
MET N WASTE C L COMM
_w - - -- - --
SEER SERVICE
-1 — — - -
0- 4312-812 -80
- -- --
-- - - - - --
s
075346
03/10/87
217,752.34
MET N WASTE C L COMM
SEWER SERVICE
10 -4612- 812 -80
"
075346 - --
03/10/87
E17,752.34-
MET N WASTE C L COMM
CORRECTION
10- 4612 - 818 -80
217,752.34
-
'
- - -
-- _ - -- - -- .
—_. — _ - -. --
— ._ _
- -_— --
- - - -- - --
_
t t t_- C K_ S
.,i
075358
03/11/87
1,915.00
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
MISC EQUIP
27- 1388 - 000 -00
-
075358
— — -
03/11/87
—
561.20
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
27- 4304 - 668 -66
2,476.20
t
-- —
j
075359_ —
__03/09/87_—
631 .50
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4 45_4_0- 5_6_0-
075359
03/09/87
e,444.65
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
_56___
10- 4540 - 560 -56
—
075359
03/11/87
95.33
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
E7- 4540- 664 -66
646388
3,171.48
+
I
d�7o�
l-•
srtsrtts
rtes -CKS „I•
�L--
ly
—�
1987 L OF EDINA CHECK , .STER 03 -16 -87 .AGE 9
_ -_ 075363 03/09/87
075363 03/09/87
075363 03/09/87
«« « « ««
10,90 MONARCH _MARKING_ -- OFFICE -_SPLY 50- 451.6. - 820 - 82_785206
21.75 MONARCH MARKING OFFICE SPLY 50 -4516- 840 -84 785208
28.80 MONARCH MARKING OFFICE SPLY SO- 4516 - 860 -86 785207
075365 03/11/87 100.00 BURT MERFELD POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42
100.00 s
SSAGE___
++ +—CKS
«RS —CKS d,
__075380 03/10/87 16,331.90 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10-4201- 220 -22
16,331.90
R - - - --
14a _
-i sRS «s«
« «« — ���..
_ CKS_
' 075402 03/09/87 30.00 NOTT COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449-44 205351
30.00 +
sss «s«
34,
« «« —CKS 33'.
075406 03/10
1
52.14 NTCC INC
52.14 R
REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 540 -54
i3
075366
03/10/87
MINNESOTA BAR
ss« -CKS
6]
075412 03/09/87
170.95
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
41.S8 +
075366
03/10/87
154.74
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 842 -84
!!�R_CK3
075366
03/10/87 _
—_ 125_90
MINNESOTA BAR
INVENTORY
5-0- 463e=A62 =86
"
13.50 R
72 '.
5
'0 075421 03/11/87
451.59 R
73
10 -4580- 646 -64 1091
--- -_ - - -- �„.
7
—
19I
075370
03/10/87
99.65
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
CONCESSIONS
28- 4624 - 703 -70
075370
03/05/87
253_83
MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO
CONCESSIONS
28- 464_7A3�0— J..950_4 —_
353.48 +
"3
=1�
075378
03/10/87
3,349.70
MARK VII SALES
INVENTORY
50-4630- 822 -82
Z'
075378_
03/05/87 —
_S,406_45
MARK VII SALES.
INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 842 -84
075378
03/10/87
5,497.90
MARK VII SALES
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
14,254.OS «
j
«RS —CKS d,
__075380 03/10/87 16,331.90 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10-4201- 220 -22
16,331.90
R - - - --
14a _
-i sRS «s«
« «« — ���..
_ CKS_
' 075402 03/09/87 30.00 NOTT COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449-44 205351
30.00 +
sss «s«
34,
« «« —CKS 33'.
075406 03/10
1
52.14 NTCC INC
52.14 R
REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 540 -54
i3
ss« -CKS
6]
075412 03/09/87
41.58 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM
23 -4642- 613 -61 132851 °
41.S8 +
6-
I
!cc
,a,l
I3, RR « «RR
!!�R_CK3
075420 03/11/87
13.50 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
34
13.50 R
72 '.
5
'0 075421 03/11/87
42.87 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE TOOLS
73
10 -4580- 646 -64 1091
--- -_ - - -- �„.
7
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 10
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV N_P.O. # MESSAGE
— 28.32_ '
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARS
10-4540- 560 -56
14827
,
,zl 075421
03/09/87
161.70
OLSON
CHAIN 6 CABLE
GEN SPLY
27- 4504 - 664 -66 68595 ,
'I 075421
03/09_/87
34.25
OLSON
CHAIN _& CABLE
GEN SUPPLY
27- 4504- 664 -66 1085 a
-- -fit *. -CKS__
:.
6
2 i
+ww + + + —_
I'
—_—
- - -_
- --
—_ --
10- 4540 - 560-56
* ** -CKS
9-
-.•
- - - - -
--
�' 075429
03/11/87
35.70
PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
075429
03/10/87
112.10
PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
075429
03/10/87
271.25
PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
' 075429
03/10/87
52.50
PEPSI
COLA BOTTLING
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 862 -86 :.
075460
03/10/87
471.55 *
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -64
•71
075445 03/09/87
075445 03/09/87
•I
89.60 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 704 -70 11239
89.60 +
1,393.46 _ PAPER CA_LMENSON__ &_CO PARTS
820.76 PAPER CALMENSON & CO PARTS
2,214.22 * '
i0-4620-S60-S6
10- 4620-560 -56 370053
*00–CKS
* ** -CKS
075446 03/09/87 1,486.25 PIONEER RIM —& WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56
1,486.25
* ** -CKS
.]
075448 03/05/87 219.10 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10-4600- 628 -62 02979
075448 03/09/87 39.55 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600 - 611 -61 02986
' 258.65
* ** –CKS
–
075452
— - --
- -- 03/11/87 --
--
— 28.32_ '
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARS
10-4540- 560 -56
14827
,
_
28.32 +
–
- - --
--- - - - - -- - – --
,
* + + +w+
-- -fit *. -CKS__
:.
075455
03/11/87
88.72
RITEWAY
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 560-56
58872
-.•
- - - - -
--
88.72 +—
I.-
*ww + *+
* ** -CKS
I�:
075460
03/11/87
57.25
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
-
075460
03/10/87
89.30
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -64
075460
-- -
03/11/87
- --
191_.20
ROYAL CROWN BEV
INVENTORY
50- 4632-862 -B6
337.75 r
—
-- - -- -
- --
o
075462
03/11/87
25.00
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
6742
+I
075462
03/11/87
47.86
RENTAL EQUIP & SALES
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 644 -64
6792
72.86
I7'6�•
1987 G_ . OF EDINA CHECK h— _lSTER 03 -16 -87 :ASE 11
MESSAGE
075471 03/10/87 174_135 KENNETH E ROSLAND
174.85
7
I5 075485 03/10/87 2,137.81 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00
075495__— 03/10/87 _ _77._00 STATE BLDG INSP DAM C_HAB_C� T..A 1_0= 3_113_ _Q0 =0.0 ____ —
2,214.81 +
075490 03/05/87 82.79 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64
82.79
* * * * **
is
075493 03/10/87 1,995.30 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82
075493 03/10/87 51106.50 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84
., 7.101.80 +
'I
**+ —CKS
* ** —CKS
075500 0
03/11/87 1
100.00 H
HAROLD SWANSON P
POLICE SERVICE 1
10- 4100-420-42
100.00
** *—CKS
075503 0
03/10/87 3
37.67 S
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP R
REPAIR PARTS 1
10- 4540 - 646 -64
37.67
075505 0
03/11/87 3
32.16 S
SUN A
ADVERTISING 1
10 -4210- 140 -14
07550_5_ 0
03/09/87 1
154.36 S
SUN A
ADVERTISING 1
10 -4210- 140 -1 -4
075505 0
03/10/87 2
28.84 S
SUN A
ADVERTISING 5
50-4214- 820 -82
075505 0
03/10/87 3
33.83 S
SUN A
ADVERTISING 5
50 -4214- 840 -84
075505 0
03/10/87 3
33.83 S
SUN A
ADVERTISING 5
50- 4214 - 860 -86
— -- 2
283.02 +
5d'
* *t -CKS 5
35
i57.
075508 0
03/05/87 7
7.25 S
ST PAUL BOOK G
GEN SUPPLY 1
10- 4504 - 133 -12
:so
11.94 * "
7I G3
�l + + + + ++ ** +_CKS 8-
3Of 075511 03/05/87 184.95 SOUTHERN VACUUM SERV SERVICES 50-4236- 841 -84 2423 6^
sl 184.95 + e
32 G r
7e
S3 075512 03/11/87 106.67 S T ROBS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 42880 71
id 106.67 * 7;
55 7.!
71
so yyyyyy * ** —CKS ''—
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 12
AMOUNT
CHECK NO.
DATE
�z
286.92 r
�i
075516
03/09/87
3 M CO
675516
63%09/67-
41
075516
03/09/87
5
075516
03/09/87
-
- 07551 6_ - --
_
03/09/87
n�
075516
03/09/87
192494
457.20
230.54
SEARS
ROEBUCK
TOOLS
- -
075525
G
99.e3
075525
03/11/87
TOOLS
075S2503/11/87
TRACY OIL
-- -
- --
075525 - --
03/11/87 _
ROEBUCK
075525
03/11/87
192494
075525
03/11/87
SEARS
075526
03/10/87
'�
rrttrr
8,634.10
643.33 r
075541
03/05/87
075542
03/10/87
CHECK REGISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 12
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
286.92 r
3 M CO
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 325 -30
—_ _160.14
— SEARS
—
ROEBUCK —
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 - 80_101039
—_—
I+I
-.15
153.42 �
SEARS
ROEBUCK
CORRECTION
40 -4580- 801 -80
192494
457.20
230.54
SEARS
ROEBUCK
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
101040
G
99.e3
TOOLS
40- 4S_80- 801 - 80_101038
TRACY OIL
-- -
n
_
153.42
SEARS
ROEBUCK
TOOLS
40 -4580- 801 -80
192494
TARGET
153.42
SEARS
ROEBUCK
TOOLS
40- 4580 - 801 -80
192494
8,634.10
643.33 r
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
286.92
TURNOUIST PAPER CO
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 520 -52
286.92 r
3 M CO
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 325 -30
167.05
107.10
3 M CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
_ 162.50_
3_M CO
SIGNS &POST
_
10 -4542- 325 -_30_
394.00
3 M CO
SIGNS & POST
10- 4542 - 325 -30
457.20
3 M CO
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4542- 325 -30
- - - -- 98.00
3 M CO
-- --- - - - ---
SIGNS & POST
--
10- 4542- 325 -30
- -- ---- - - - - --
1 , 385.85 *—
5,160.35
TRACY OIL
-- -
GASOL.'INE
10 -4612- 560 -56 44280
- -- - -
5,160.35 r
203.40
TARGET
AMM.UNITION
29- 4572 - 722 -72
203.40 +
_ -- _ _
8,634.10
THORPE DIST
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 862 -86
+ #+ -CKS
" `
8,634.10 +
+ # #t ## ++ +-CKS
075569 03/10/87 - 403.93 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL GASOLINE 28- 4612 - 704 -70
403.93 r
� #�trt* - --- -------- - - - - -- -- - -- - -- --- - - -- ++ +-CKS —' -'
075575
I
;i 075586
03/11/87 38.45 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 031414
- - - -- 38.45 r - - - -- -
03/09/87
07559 0 -- 03/11/
i„
11/
13
14.23 W W GRAINGER
r
CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 703 -70
100.00 HENRY WROBLESKI POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42
100.00 r
73.92 +
A
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 140 -14
+ ++ -CKS
I,
17-
,_
Ii,q
1987 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 03 -16-8? eAGE 13
I'_- --- * * *b ** _ - --- ---------- -- - - -- -bt+ —CKS __. 1^
3 075616 03/05/87 465.62 MILLPORE CORPORATION GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 482 -48 15672 17
e 465.62 +
: 7 - - -- --
bbbbbb
bbb -CKS
075702 03/05/87 25.00 PLUNKETTS INC GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 702 -70 334350
25.00 +
075703 03/05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT 50- 4216 - 820 -82
075703 03/05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT 50- 4216 - 840 -84
_075703 — _-- 03 /05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT SQ= g2l6_8Si0_66
750.00 b
075704 03/05/87 114.00 DON ENDER UNIFORM ALLOW 1Q42�i6= 420 =42
114.00 * —
ro
"i -- 075705 — 03/05_/87 39_99_ _WM J WALSH UNIFORM ALLOW 10= 4266 = 420 =42_-
39.99 • - - -- -- -
075706 03/05/87 75_00 LOLA EDMAN SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 9165
- -- 75.00 * - - - - - -- - --
?. _075707 _03/05/87 50_00 MGA INC DUES 27 -4204- 661 -66
50.00 • --- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- _.
- 075708 - _ 03/05/87 38_18 C E GROTH MUSIC CO MUSIC SUPLY 10- 4596 - 627 -62
- - - --
38.16 • -
075709_ 03/05/87 210_00 JERRYS LANDSCAPR CONT REPAIRS 50 -4248- 841 -84 49114
-- - -- 210.00 * - ------ - - -- --
i
075710
03/05/87
'I, 07s594
03/05/87
075711
,I
03/05/87
'i 075712
:al
03/09/87
S
075713
'7,
03/09/87
SINS RESTAURANTS
12.00 b
3,483_.33 STOREFRONT /YDUTH ACTION SERVICES 10 -4201- 504 -50—
402.00 NATL OFFICE INTERIOR FURNITURE 10 -4901- 420 -42 B69301
3,885.33 b
389.37 WESCO
389.37 •
1,011.50 GREENHAVEN PRINTING
1,011.50 b
075714 03/09/87 195.00 GUSTAF JOHNSON
195.00 +
075715 03/09/87 42.98 DANIEL KELLEY
42.98
CONT REPAIRS
GEN SPLY
AMBULANCE REFUND
REFULND
28 -4M48- 702-70 333714
10- 4504 - 560 -56 12665
10 -3180- 000 -00
40 -1130- 000 -00
075716 03/09/87 273.00 EDINA POLICE DEPT CAR WASHES 10 -4296- 560 -56
273.00 b
3.
3'.
I3[
5f
7
'a
G7
6r
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 14
075721
075722
03/09/87
03/09/87
075723 03/09/87
^I 075724 03/09/87
52.90 _ PHYSICIANS DESK PDR DRUGS 10 -4510- 440 -44
52.90 s - -- - - - - - - -- �,
12.00 JIMMY JINGLE INC REFUND 10- 3045 - 000 -00
12.0 0 • - - - - - - - -'
95.46 _ ROAD RESCUE 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 020208-
95.46 -s - - - --
168.63-------0 M SCOTT 6 SONS CO FERTILIER 27 -4558- 664 -66 51996
168.63 • - -- - - -- - - - -- --
075785
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. N MESSAGE
188.60
s
�i
075717 -
- - - 1 -
03/09/87
- - -- -
86.00_
-8
MARSHALL 6 SWIFT
GEN SPLY
10- 4504 - 200 -20
S
CONCESSIONS
-
28-4624- 703-70
-- --
6.
r
5
_-
075718 _ -
-'- - - --
03/09/87
-- --
20._00
IAAO
- --
DUES
10- 4204 - 200 -20 672115
I
s
075727
03/09/87 _ _
20.00 s
-
CONCESSIONS
-- -
n
-
075719
- -- - - - --
03/09/87
- - -- - -
-- 15.00 _ _
-- -15.0
CHIEF FIRE E_ XECUTIVE
SUBSCRIPTION
10- 4204 - 440 -44
CONCESSIONS
28 -4624- 704 -70
0 •
-
-
075720 -
-- - --
03/09/87
- - - --
42.45_
N F P A ---
10 -4502- 440 -44
075728
03/09/87 -
15.00
42.45 r
-BOOK
- --
075721
075722
03/09/87
03/09/87
075723 03/09/87
^I 075724 03/09/87
52.90 _ PHYSICIANS DESK PDR DRUGS 10 -4510- 440 -44
52.90 s - -- - - - - - - -- �,
12.00 JIMMY JINGLE INC REFUND 10- 3045 - 000 -00
12.0 0 • - - - - - - - -'
95.46 _ ROAD RESCUE 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 020208-
95.46 -s - - - --
168.63-------0 M SCOTT 6 SONS CO FERTILIER 27 -4558- 664 -66 51996
168.63 • - -- - - -- - - - -- --
075785
03/09/87 -
- -- 188.60,-
COURSIGN INC, -
REPAIR PARTS
27-4S40-666-66
7064_
188.60
s
----
- - - -�:
-
075726
- -- -
_ - 03/09/87 -
-- - --
- 24_.74
DAIRY HOME INC
-s
CONCESSIONS
-
28-4624- 703-70
-- --
- -
r
24.74
-----
- - --
- -- - ..,
075727
03/09/87 _ _
_ 14.32
- - AM BAKERIES CO
CONCESSIONS
_28- 4624 - 703_70
075727
03/10/87
6.27
AM BAKERIES CO
CONCESSIONS
28 -4624- 704 -70
075728
03/09/87 -
15.00
VENDMARK INC
10-3056- 000 -00
REFUND
15.00
M
,r
075729
03/09/87
145.00
QUALITY REFRIG INC
100378
CONT REPAIRS
27- 4248- 662 -66
"j
145.00
s
I:
t3 "'075730
03/09%87
82.00
CLARENCE HARPENS
SERVICES
27- 4201 - 662 -66
"I
82.00
-
075731
03/09/87
R G ROBERTSON
MEETING EXPENSES
27.10
10- 4206-430 -42
I'
17
I
27.10
s
Inr
.1�
075732
03/09/87
RADIO SHACK
EQUIP NEW
10- 4902-420-42
375107
43.93
�10
s,
43.93
•
°2
075733
03/09/87
84.00
DAYLE LOCK SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
18030
-
1 -3
Asa
84.00
•
--
`
17,
07S734 03/10/87 64.90 MOORE BUSINESS CTR GEN SUPPLYU 10- 4504 - 510 -51 j74
5 - 075734 03/09/87 317.50 MOORE BUSINESS CTR OFFICE EQUIP 25- 4906 - 510 -51
7
1987
I
CHECK
OF EDINA
NO. DATE
(2 075734
075734
03/10/87
03/09/87
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
CHECK 1STER 03- 16 -8's PAGE 15
UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION "hCCOVJILNO-LNK--M--P-O-�-I- MESSAGE -,
260.00 MOORE BUSINESS CTR OFFICE FURNITURE 25- 4906 - 510 -51
4,410_00 BUSINESS CTR OFFI_CE EQUIP
5, 052.40 •
`I 075735 03/09/87 3,921_00 E H RENNER J6 SONS CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248-801 =84
3,921.00 +
gI 07573603/09/87 540."00 BMS OFFICE - SALE$, GEN- SUPPLY - 1.0 =4504- 510 -51.
° 075736 03/10/87 395.00 BMS OFFICE SALES OFFICE EQUIP 10- 4901 - 160 -16
935.00 +
c
"i
075737
03/10/87
562.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
10- 4504 - 133 -12
�
075737
03/10/87
1,600.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
10- 4600 - 62 7
7 -62
"5,
075737
03/10/87
CHIPPEWA - GRAPHICS
PRINTING
23-4600.-6
075737
03/10/87
562.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
26- 4600- 681 -68
"
075737
03/10/87
602.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
27- 4600-661 -66
°
075737
03/10/87
562.00
CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS
PRINTING
28- 4600_701 -70
"I
4,450.00 s
_
075738
03/1.0/87
170_78
-78--CELLULAR
10_ 04 -140
170.78 •
,I
I-
�0
- 75739
03/1.0/87
86_50
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50 -_ 4632- 822 -82
075739
03/10/87
133.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 842 -84
7
075739
03/10/87
180.00
NORTHSTAR ICE
INVENTORY
50- 4632 - 862 -86
--
- --
--
399_50 •
__
075740
03/10/87
145.06
LABOR RELATIONS
SERVICES
10 -4201- 140 -14
075.740
03/10/87
237_39
LABOR RELATIONS
SERVICES
10-4201 - 140 -14
382.44 M
- - -
075741
03/10/87
415_00
HENN CTY TREAS
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10- 4250 - 353- 30 -L2845
415.0 0 *
- - - - - --
_
075742
03/10/87
12.00
MN STATE NORTICUL
SUBSCRIPTION
10 -4204- 600-60
ar
A;
12.00
°
075743
- --
03/10/87
10.00
MN SOCIETY OF
MEM @ERSHIP
10 -4204- 800 -60
31
Is:
1 0 . 0 0 }
- - -„
075744
03/10/87
50_00
THE LOTUS 11
REFUND
tt -3155- 000 -00
sa
ss `-
sn'
50.00 +
"I
075745
03/10/87
30.00
SERVICE AM CORP
REFUND
10- 3050 - 000 -00
.I
3 0 . 0 0 •
- - - - --
-
=I
075746
03/10/87
495.28
MPLS WELDER SUPPLY
SERVICES
23 -4201- 611 -61
j
495.28 •
Ic;
i
-I --
075747
03/10/87
126.02
STEBGO METALS INC
SERVICSE3
23 -4201- 611 -61
b,k
i;`I
126.02
075748
03/10/87
90.00
MOLLIE PAULSON
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
70
'.
7,�
90.00 s
;;
74
075749
03/10/87
210.00
J THOMAS NELSON
SERVICES ___ -
23- 4201 - 611 -61
751.
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 16
5 075765 03/10/87 19.32 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE
10 -4290- 140 -14
z
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
(=
210.00
+
QI
075750
03/10/87
50.96
NATL CAMERA EXCHANGE
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 440 -44
15050
5
50.96
+
075751
03/107
/8
438.00
VANTAGE ELECTRIC IN C
CONT REPAIRS
10 -4248- 646 -64
9700 -
13j
075751
03/10/87
35.00
VANTAGE ELECTRIC INC
CONT REPAIRS
29- 4248 - 722 -72
9698
9'
473.00
•
075752
03/10/67
25.00
D C HEY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 133 -12
029552
='
25.00
+
075753
03/10/87
48.00
CAREER TRACK
SEMINAR
10 -4202- 440 -44
48.00
+
117
075754
03/10/87
44.00
FARM CHEMICALS
HANDBOOK
10 -4502- 440 -44
B'
075490
03/10/87
15.58
SHERWIN WILLIAMS -
PAINT
10-4544- 646 -64
075816
03/10/87
457.60
BROOKSIDE CRT CONDO
REFUND
40- 1130 - 000 -00
]LI
075755
03/10/87
500.00
LAKELAND FLORIST
CONT SERV
10- 4200 - 180 -18
500.00
•
075756
03/10/87
4,820.00
BRUNSON INST COMP
MACHINES
10- 4901 - 260 -26
075756
03/10/87
2,675.00
BRUNSON INST COMP
MACHINES
10- 4901 - 260 -26
7,495.00
+
075757
03/10/87
400.00
MARTIN MCALLISTER
PERSONEL
10 -4212- 510 -51
075757
03/10/87
600.00
MARTIN MCALLISTER
PERSONEL
10- 4212 - 510 -51
075758
03/10/87
2,148.07
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN
CABLE TV
-
10 -2148- 000 -00
- - - --- --- -- - --
- -- --- - - - - -- --
2,148.07
+
- - - -
075759
-- ---- -
03/10/87
- - - -- - --
259.40
TIERNEY BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
87803
"!
259.40
+
- -
--
075760
03/10/87
125.00
MN SAFETY COUNCIL
- -- - --
PERSONEL
-- -
10- 4212 - 510 -51
----- - - - - --
- - - - -- - - --
--
125.0 0
+
.:^
- - ---
075761
- - -- - - ---
03/10/87
- -
71.00
DEPARTMENT OF
TREES
10- 4560 - 644-64
'
71.00
•
_
-
14
075762 - --
03/10/87
_39.00_
WORKING SMART
PERSONEL
10 -4212- 510 -51
`'_
075763
03/10/87
849.76
REGION VI
PERCENTAGE PLAYOFFS
28- 3480 - 000 -00
I�
849.76
•
-
--
!-ol
IS1I _
07S764
- - - --
03/10/87
10_5.0_0
EDIN,6 POLICE DEPT
MEETING EXP
10 -4206- 430 -42
-
(51
- -
- -
- 105.00
•
•
5 075765 03/10/87 19.32 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE
10 -4290- 140 -14
z
• 1987 OF EDINA
K NO.
I
CHECK ASTER
03 -16-8. :AGE 17
M-P O-.�-#- MESSAGE -_ --
1'
._
075766 -�
03/10/87
21.00
U I ED WA
►�L- -- �MPLS
_- 1 -�lNCH
1.0= 4E0.6.- 14.0 -.14 _--- ---- - - - -
- - - --
21.00
68_0 0 •
- -- ----- - - - --
075767
03/10/87
85.26
TC HOME JUI -CE
INVENTORY
50_4632- 842 -84
OFFICE SUPPLIES
075767
03/10/87
41.04
TC HOME JUICE
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
°
126.30 +
((
075771
03/10/87
=
"
075768
075768
03/10/87
03/10/67
32,224.50
R an
METRO WASTE CONTROL
METRO UASTE GONT -ROL
10- 3095- 000 -00
10-3093-000 00
BLDG PERMITS
50_00_ •
.,PP4
-6186 PERMITS
"I
075769
03/10/87
58.00
PHYLLIS GROSSMAN
SKI REFUND
10 -2240- 000 -00
- - - --
--
68_0 0 •
7
075770
03/10/87
64.55
MURRAY SANDLER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
28- 4516- 701 -70
64.55 •
((
075771
03/10/87
50.00
GREATER MPLS AREA
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 200 -20
- - --
--
50_00_ •
_ _
075772
03/10/87
45.00
HARRIETTE BACH
SUBSCRIPTION
23- 4204 - 611 -61
075773
03/10/87
28.00
BARBARA LUNDGREN
ART WORK
23 -3625- 000 -00
- - - --
- --
28.00 •
-
075774
03/10/87
105.00
- -
VIRGINIA LEFEVERE
ART WORK
23 -3625- 000 -00
105.00*
075775
03/10/87
133.52
KAY SHARKEY
ART WORK
23 -3625- 000 -00
133.52 r
075776
03/10/87
36.00
MAUREEN BROCKWAY
SERVICES
23- 4120 - 612 -61
4`
36.00 +
i
075777
03/10/87
111.67
MOLLIE PAULSON
ART WORK
23 -3625- 000 -00
_.- 075777
03/10/87
49.78
MOLLIE PAULSON-
SERV,ICES-_
-23- 4120 - 613 -61
075777
03/10/87
49.78-
MOLLIE PAULSON
CORRECTION
23- 4120 - 613 -61
'
075777
03/10/87
49.48
MOLLIE PAULSON
SERVICES
23 -4120- 613 -61
`1
161.15 •
075778
03/10/87
48.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
INSTRUCTOR
23-4201- 611 -61
("
075778
03/10/87
84_00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
°I
075778
03/10/87
19.00
PHYLLIS HAYWA
SUPPLIES
23 -4588- 611 -61
151 .00 +
6]
"
075779
03/10/87
86.26
KUSTOM ELECTRONICS
PAYMENT
10- 4901 - 420 -42
66.26 +
Cl
fig,
075780
03/10/87
19.75
NTOA
TEXTBOOK
10- 4502 - 420 -42
yA'
19.75 +
'°
ITA
7,
771
z3
075781
03/10/87
1,502.94
STRGAR ROSCOE
SERVICSES
10- 4201 - 260 -26
1,502.94 +
�79I\
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 18
075790
075792
075793
075794
`71 075795
-ol 075796
�5' 1,,
I- 075797
„ 075798
03/11/87 81.85 MAYO DST INVENTORY 50- 630 - 822 -82
- -- -- - - I 4
81.85 - - - --- - - - - -- - --
++ + -CKS
03/11/87 15.00 LEAANN VITO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449 -44
15.00 +
03/11/87 91.00 CUTOM CAMERA CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 115662
91.00 +
03/11/87
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.0_M- MESSAGE
3
075782
03/10/87
164,038.50
-
HARRIS TRUST d
DUE_HRA
10- 1145 - 000 -00
568.25 +
164,038.50
+
188.51
KARTUEMS SALES
F
27- 4540- 666 -66
075783_
03/10/87
3.1S
_ BRADY OFFICEWARE
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
31.96
075783
03/10/87
9.95
BRADY OFFICEWARE
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
075783
03/10/87
5.92
BRADY OFFICEWARE
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
075783
03/10/87
6.00
BRADY OFFICEWARE
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 420 -42
075784
03/10/87
7.0_0
NE METRO TECH
TUITION
10- 4202 - 420 -42 - - -- - --
.,
---
---
7.00
+
.
075785
03/10/87
1.24
LYNDALE_HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64 9555
"I
075785
03/10/87
33.56
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLY
10 -4504- 646 -64 72340 -
34.80
+
075786
03/10/87
15.00
STATE TREASURER
CERTIFICATION
40- 4310- 809 -60
_.I
15.00
«
1
075787
03/10/87
1,750.00
SUBURBAN RATE
SERVICES
10- 4801 - 509 -50
1,750.00
•
075788
03/11/87
387.00
ERIC ANDERSON
10- 4200-500 -50
CONT SERV
075788
03/11/87
47.25
ERIC ANDERSON
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 500-50
434.25
+
075789
03/11/87
19.95
PIP PRINTING
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504- 133 -12
075789
03/11/87
- - -- 64.30
PIP PRINTING
-+
GEN SUPPLY
10 -4504- 133 -12
- - - -- - - -- - - -- -
--
-- - -- - - --
84.25
075790
075792
075793
075794
`71 075795
-ol 075796
�5' 1,,
I- 075797
„ 075798
03/11/87 81.85 MAYO DST INVENTORY 50- 630 - 822 -82
- -- -- - - I 4
81.85 - - - --- - - - - -- - --
++ + -CKS
03/11/87 15.00 LEAANN VITO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449 -44
15.00 +
03/11/87 91.00 CUTOM CAMERA CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 115662
91.00 +
03/11/87
59.99
TARGET
GEN SUPPLY
27- 4504 - 662 -66
59.99
- . - -_ -
03/11/87
568.25
WINFIELD DEVELOPMENT
LEASE
-
10- 4201 - 627 -62
568.25 +
03/11/87
188.51
KARTUEMS SALES
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540- 666 -66
188.51 +
03/11/87
31.96
TOWN d COUNTRY DODGE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56 P2761
31 -96 +
03/11/87
26.07 GARLANDS INC GEN SPLY
f�
c
Ir
10 -4504- 646 -64 2311
- - -- `7--'
3
s
e
to
1987 OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
075799
03/11/87
CHECK ISTER
26.07 +
71.70 ED MCDEVITT CO REPAIR PARTS
71.70 +
10- 4540 - 560 -56
ur:)nuu u -s/ llidr 32.27 AAA FORM COMPANY REPIAR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56
32.27 +
03-16 -8. PAGE 19
MESSAGE
75813 03/11/87 19.50 ADVANCE PAGING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12
° 19.50 + : °�
�67
91 �
s= 075814 03/11/87 1,266.00 MN BUSINESS TEL SYS TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 6460
'3 °
1 , 266.00 + 7O
7,
7.'
075815 03/11/87 374.00 FRAN HOFFMAN REFUND 10- 4202 - 240 -24 731
L17
374.00 + h7411 __l7
075801
03/11/87
20.18
BLOOMINGTON DODGE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -S6
62243
z
20.18 +
075802
03/11/87
33.30
EMR
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
089842
°
33.30 +
075803
03/11/87
5.00
MUNICI PALS
DUES
10 -4206- 500 -50
-
7
,o
5.00 +
.�I
075804
03/11/87
42.15
GARNER HARDWARE
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 520 -52
877
y
-
42.15 +
075805
03/11/87
2,181.50-
FRED G ANDERSON
CORRECTION
10- 4540 - 520 -52
'3
075805
03/11/87
2,181.50
FRED G ANDERSON
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
075805
03/11/87
281_50
FRED G ANDERSON
REPAIR PARTS
10= 450 =5252
281.50 +
=_
07.580 -6_
_ 03/11/87
495.34._
GO�H2R SIGN CO
SIGN66�Q,RT3
10-4542 - 325 -0
8 -68 -L17 --
- - --
495.34 r
°_
075807
- - - -^
03/11/87
85_00
AUTO P 6 L INC
CONT REPAIRS
10 --4--S60- 6
$$125_
'
85.00 +
-,
0_75808
03/11/87
235.55
DRESSER CONSTRUCTION
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540= _S60_56�59�4 -
'
235.55 +
--
�I
0_75809
03/11/87
52.40
DIAMOND VOGEL JPAINT
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 301 -30
06713
3
52.40 +
075810
03/11/87
355_11
JIM HATCH SALES_
GEN SUPPLY
10 =4 4504 - 301 =30
6841
"
075810
03/11/87
421.20
JIM HATCH SALES
TOOLS
10-4580- 301 -30
6840
'
"
776.31 +
5.
i
075811
03/11/87
51.13
DIRECT SAFETY CO
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 480 -48
205236
'
51.13 a
sl
075812
03/11/87
136.00
WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 520 -52
44851
°�
9I
136.00 +
IG,
75813 03/11/87 19.50 ADVANCE PAGING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12
° 19.50 + : °�
�67
91 �
s= 075814 03/11/87 1,266.00 MN BUSINESS TEL SYS TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 6460
'3 °
1 , 266.00 + 7O
7,
7.'
075815 03/11/87 374.00 FRAN HOFFMAN REFUND 10- 4202 - 240 -24 731
L17
374.00 + h7411 __l7
1987 CITY OF EDINA
3
CHECK
REGISTER
03 -16 -87 PAGE 20
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV M P 0. A MESSAGE.
—
1
�e7
SL`
13�
i � •114.41
i7
490,248.82
FUND
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
I
2,410.56
FUND
23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
4,- 987.50
FUND
_25
TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
17C
7
562.00
FUND
26
TOTAL
—_
SWIMMING POOL FUND
_
7J
"
8,671.34
FUND
27
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
4,295.66
FUND
- 28–TOTAL
RECREATION- CENTER FUND
287.11
FUND
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
13,353.56
FUND
40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
54,657.60
- --
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
Computer chesks_s�_6625_thru _
76858
1-
579,474.15
TOTAL
- -- -- --- - -- ---
- -- - -------
FIfiT IJ L—
0 ' .
3
s"
in.
—
I
�e7
SL`
13�
5,
1:
Gf
17C
71
31
7J
TalIl
�7y
0 ' .
. I
1987 C. OF EDINA CHECK 1% -48TER 0e-e8 -87 4GE
CHECK NO._ DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE
- 34015 0e/e3/87 144.00 AT & T TELEPHONE
144.00
10-4e56-510-51 MANUAL
3 14
+++ -CKS
DISCOUNT 50-3710-003-00 MANUAL lb!
034135 0e/e3/87 56.23 EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50-463e-822-Se MANUAL
034135 0e/e3/87 ge 93 EAGLE_ WINE,___ INVENTORY 50-4638-84e-84
034135 0e/e3/87 68.50 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50-463e-862-86 MANUAL
034135 0e/23/87 68.50- EAGLE WINE CORRECTION 50-463e-86e-86 MANUAL
zl 034135 02/23/87 _- 108.50 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50-463e-86e-86 MANUAL
e55.49
4.
034138 0e/23/87 77.e5 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 MANUAL
034138 02/23/87 155.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630-86e-86 MANUAL
-034138 02/e3/87 e3.5e ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4632-84e-84 MANUAL i2;
ul
256.27
*++ -CKS
3I 3v
31
02/23/87 e4.94 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50 -463e-84e-84 MANUAL
24.94
_ ± +! -CKS 3
034540 02/23/87 8.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4626-822-8e MANUAL
034540 02/23/87 ee.00 TWIN CITY_WINE -INVENTORY .50-46e6-84E-84 -MANUAL----l-1-i
�034540 02/23/81 34.46--- TWIN -CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4626-862-86 MANUAL - :
61034540 0e/23/87 48.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-46e8-822-82 MANUAL 14--
034540____ Oe/23/87 100.80 TWIN CITY WINIEL- ----I-N-VENTORY -46e8-86e-86
- 50 ------MANUAL-.
034546 oe/n/s* 77.75 F TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY SO-4630-842-84 MANUAL
141L
290.95 • 471
+++ -CKS ;4o;
1
041067 03/05I/87--- 98..77 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-8e2-8e MANUAL 155
041067 03/05/87 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-82e-82 MANUAL 1"
041067 03/05/87 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 541.
041067 03/05/87 69.95 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI -S4e-84 MANUAL 551
50
041067 03/05/87 6.50 CAPITAL DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - -46e8 MANUAL 17 1
5n. .
s041067 03/05/87 e74.38 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-46e8-84e-84 MANUAL 39
474.60
2
+++ -CKS
041135 03/05/87 NE 50-3710-82e-8e MANUAL
041135 03/05/87 15.11- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL
671
041135 03/05/87 16.16- EAGLE WINE
50-371-0--84e-8.4 -MANUAL
041135 03/05/87 �16 - ' 14- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 69;
7
041 03/05/87 14.31- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-86e-86 MANUAL 710
1*
135 03/05/87 755.48 EAGLE WINE 2
6441 - 50-46e6-See-82 MANUAL 3
1 1 135 03/05/87 e,006.98 EAGLE WINE 50-46e6-84e-84 MANUAL J-14
0
41135 03/05/87 415.85 EAGLE WINE 50-4628-8e2 -82 MANUAL
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PACE
111111
1
.i
so*-CKS
CHECK NO. D
DATE A
AMOUNT V
VENDOR I
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A
A P.O. Y MESSAGE
041135 0
03/05/87 6
607.77 E
EAGLE WINE 5
50 -4628- 842 -84 M
MANUAL Z
Z
041135 7
715.69 E
EAGLE WINE 5
50- 4628- 862 -86
- -
4,607.73 t
Jia 1
111111 _
_ 0
000-CKS
•io 0
041138 0
03/05/87 1
1.76- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710 - 822 -62 M
MANUAL
y. 0
041138 0
03/05/87
15.44- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710 - 822 -82 M
MANUAL
___
03/05/87
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710- 822 -82 M
MANUAL
E 0
041138 0
03/05/87 1
16.76- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50 -3710- 842 -84 M
MANUAL 0
041138 _
03/05/87 3
30.88- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3_710- 842 -84 M
MANUAL__
_ 0
0305%87 3
36.16- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50 -3710- 842 -84 M
MANUAL
041138 0
03/05/87 2
27.83- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL '
'0
041138 _
03/05/87 _
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
I6 0
_
03/05/87 8
_32.75- E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 3710 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041138 0
03/05/87 6
678.20 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50 -4626- 822 -82 M
MANUAL
041138 0
03/05/87 1
1,543.86 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 4626- 842 -84 M
MANUAL
041136 0
03/05/87 1
1,391.28 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 4626- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
�z+ _
041138 0
03/05/87 8
88.00 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 4628 - 822 -82 M
MANUAL
041138 _
03/05/87 _
772.05 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50_- 4628 - 822 -82 M
MANUAL
z:
_ 0
_ _
_ 0
_ 7
ED PHILLIPS 5
50- 4628- 842 -84 M
MANUAL =
="
041138 0
03/05/87 1
11808.10 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50 -4628- 842 -84 M
MANUAL
041138 0
03/05/87 1
1,637.25 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50-4628-868-86
_ 0
041138 0
03%05%87 _ 4
437.62 E
ED PHILLIPS 5
50 -4628- 868 -86 M
MANUAL
,-: 9
9,010.63
-** -
--- -
-CKS
041433 _
03/05/87 _
6.00 P
PAUSTIS &SONS 5
50 -4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
_ 0
041433 T 0
_ 0
_ 6
_ PAUSTIS 6 _ 80N$ 5
50 -4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041433 0
03/05/87 2
275.92- P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041433 0
03/05/87 2
275.92- P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50-4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
_ 0
041433 0
03/05/87 2
275.92 P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041433 0
03/05/87 8
8.00- P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041433 _
03/05/87 2
275.92 P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628- 862-86 -
__ 0
03/05/87 2
275.92 P
PAUSTIS b $ONS 5
50-4628- 862 -86 M
--MANUAL __I,'
041433 0
03/05/87 8
8.00 P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL
041433 _
03/05/87 _
8.00 P
PAUSTIS & SONS_ 5
50- 4628-862 -86 —
— _ _ MANUAL
_ 0
_ 8
8.00- P
PAUSTIS 6 SONS 5
50- 4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL 3
3
041433 0
03/05/87 2
275.92 P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50- 4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL .
.Q
041433 0
03/05/87 _
PAUSTIS 6 SONS 5
50- 4628- 862 -86 M
MANUAL
-" 0
041433 0
03�05/6T 8
_ _ _2.7.5.92- P
PAUSTIS & SONS 5
50 -4626- 862 -86 M
MANUAL 9
9�
ttt -CKS
-�.1I_ 0
041435 _
03/05/87 _
12.65- _
WINE CO 5
50- 3710_- 822 -82 M
MANUAL __ -
---- �'ll';
___ 0
_ 1
15.83- — P
_PRIOR_ W
50- 3710 - 842 -84 M
L
041435 0
03/05/87 5
5.84- P
PRIOR WINE CO 5
50- 3710 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL '
'7
} +' _
03/05/67 6
632_.25 P
PRIOR WINE CO 5
50 -_ 4628 - 822_ -8_2 M
MANUAL__
_041435 _
_ 0
03/05/87 7
791.50 P
PRIOR WINE CO 5
50- 4626 - 642 -84 M
MANUAL
041435 0
03/05/87 2
292.15 P
PRIOR WINE CO 5
50- 4628 - 862 -86 M
MANUAL „
„i
} 1
1 , 681 .58 + I
1
.i
so*-CKS
r
r
r
.y
r
d
� I
041540
03/05/87
18.02-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3700- 822 -82
MANUAL
• 1987•
OF EDINA
03/05/87
_ _ _ _ _ _8.83-
-
CHECK
STER
WINE_
02- 28 -8', ACE 3
CHECK
N0. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. _INV _N
P.-0._— •_MESSAGE,,-___—
041451
— 02/23/87 _.
_ _ 28 —
QUALITY
WINE
DISCOUNT_
_ —__SO -371 0- 003 -00
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
16.70—
QUALITY
WINE
041540
--
SO -3710- 822 -82
._ - -
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
16.15—
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041451
- -_ - - - --
- -- 03/05/87
_ ____1.0.95—
QUALITY
WINE --
MANUAL
SO-3710—See—Se
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
1.69-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- S22 -S2
— MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
11.42-
QUALITY
WINE
WINE_
50-3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
041451
_ 03/05/87
_
_ _- 21 .91- -.._
QUALITY
WINE
-- -��- � -� - -- -- -- -
- - -50 -3710- 842 -84_
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
3.27-
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
.....-
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
8.92-
QUALITY
WINE
____ ___ __ 6.03 -_
SO- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
041451
_ 03/OS/87___
..._03
___QUALITY
_WINE_
_
-3710- 862 -86_
0540
041451
03/05/87
1 .50-
QUALITY
WINE
041540
_S0 --
50- 3710- 862 -86
._________MANUAL
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
834.34
QUALITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
041451
_ 03/05/87
- - -54.44_____
QUALITY
WINE,
-
SO -4626- 822 -82_
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
806.94
QUALITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
SO -4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
569.58
QUALITY
WINE
WINE
50 -4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
041451
_ 03/05/87 _
-- _ - 163.32
QUALITY
WINE
CITY _WINE
- --
MANUAL____
041451
03/05/87
444.62
QUALITY
WINE
0540
50 -4626- 962 -86
— _-
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
1,087.95
QUALITY
WINE
.83-
SO- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
041451
_ 03/05/87
- _ 2,178.20
_ -. .- -_ -
-- QUALITY_WINE
--
-- . - - -__-
-4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
041451
03/05/87
1,142.30
QUALITY
WINE
041540
_50
60- 4628- 962 -86
-- -
MANUAL
r 041451
03/05/87
3.07-
QUALITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
'i 041451
02/23/87
-_ 27.90 __
QUALITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 862 -86
MANUAL
03/05/87___
1.22 -__
7, 204.36 •
CITY
WINE
S0- 3710 - 862 -86_—
- - - - --
- - - -- - - -
041540
03/05/87
1.05-
0540
CITY
WINE
__
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
r
r
r
.y
r
d
� I
041540
03/05/87
18.02-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3700- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ _ _ _ _ _8.83-
-
_ _ 0540
CITY_
WINE_
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
.79-
0340
CITY
WINE
---
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
.65-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
9.22-
0540
CITY
WINE --
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
1.73-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
17.38-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
.91-
0540
CITY
WINE_
50- 3710 - 822 -82___
MANUAL___
041540
03/05/87
1.92-
0540
CITY
WINE
____
50- 3710 - 822 -82 --MANUAL-----
ANUAL
041540
03/05/87
1.05-
0540
CITY
WINE
SO- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
____ ___ __ 6.03 -_
OS40_
CITY _WINE
--
50- 371.0- 842- 84--
041540
03/05/87
40.57-
0540
CITY
WINE
______
60- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
3.46-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
_ 03/05/87
-
0540_CITY
WINE
SO- 37_10- 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
2.45-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
11.29-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
._ _ - 83
- OS40._
CITY _WINE
- --
50 -3710- 862- 86_.-
041540
03/05/87
17.44-
0540
CITY
WINE
-__.____ -- .____MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
.83-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ _ .33 -_
0540
CITY
WINE
SO -3710- 862 -86�_—
MANUAL__
041540
03/05/87
1.05-
0540
CITY
WINE
_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
__ MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
4.58-
0540
CITY
WINE
SO- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87___
1.22 -__
0540
CITY
WINE
S0- 3710 - 862 -86_—
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
1.05-
0540
CITY
WINE
__
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
_
041540
03/05/87
.83-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
_ 03/05/87
-
461.35
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626 - 822 -8E
MANUAL
,
041540
03/05/87
869.00
0540
CITY
WINE
- - -
50- 4626 - 828 -82
MANUAL
: -.
041540
03/05/87
2,028.77
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
.n
t
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
02 -28 -87 PAGE 4
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT -
-- VENDOR - -
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT N0. INV.
M P.O. N MESSAGE
041540
02/23/87
64.00
TWIN CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 842 -64
MANUAL
041540
02/23/87
829.31 _
TWIN CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
871.65
_
0540 CITY
_ _
WINE
_I_NVEN_T_ORY _ _
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
02/23/87
44.40
TWIN CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50-4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ _ 193.52 _
0540 CITY
WINE_
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL_-
041540
02/23/87
12.80
_
TWIN CITY
_
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 822 -82
-
MANUAL
-:
"
041540
03/05/87
64.85
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
- -- .00 --
-- 0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
172.75
0540 CITY
WINE - - -
- - - -- --
- 50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
78.99
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
90.34
-
0540 CITY
WINE
50-4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
t,i26.00
0540 CITE
WIWE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
603.31
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ 244.35
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
02/23/87
66.80
TWIN CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
104.92
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
____ _491.65 _
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
345.50
__0540
0540 CITY
-- - - - - -
WINE
--
-- -- - -
50- 4628 - 842 -84
- - -- -- -
MANUAL
-
041540
03/05/87
39.95
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
104.92
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
.00
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
82.80-
0540`CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ 122.20
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
458.62
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
82.88
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628-862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
_ 82.80
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
041540
03/05/87
104.45
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
X041540
02/23/87
87.20
TWIN CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
1
9,610.77 r
rrrrrr
000-CKS
1
044782
02/23/87
21000.00
POSTMASTER
-
POSTAGE _
10 -4290- 510 -51
MANUAL
2,000.00 r
rrrrrr
- -
-- - - - -- - -- -------- --- ------------------
- - -- --
--
wrr -CKS
049067
03/05/87
3.00 _
_ CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI___
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
049067
03/05/87
98.94
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
-
50- 4628- 822 -82
_ -_
MANUAL
049067
03/05/87
149.90
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
049067
03/05/87
______ 5.00
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI____
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
049067
03/05/87
174.95
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI-
- _
-
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
049067
03/05/87
5.00
CAPITAL CITY
DISTRI
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
436.79 •
rwwrrr
wrr -CKS
�.
049129
03/05/87
- - - 1 0.37- -
- BELLBOY -
-- - -
50- 3710-862 -86
MANUAL
049129
03/05/87
649.68
BELLBOY
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
049129
03/05/87
2,491.92 _
-.
HELL OY
_
50- 4626 - 842 -84-
MANUAL
•�
049129
03/05/87
2,098.90
BELLBOY
_
_ `_-
-
60- 4626 - 862 -86
- ___ -�_ ...
MANUAL
--
I,
r
5,230.13 +
rrr -CKS
049135
03/05/87
70-
EAGLE WINE
_ - -
- -_ _ -i5
_ --
_
5,0- 3710 - 822 -82
- __' -- - --_ -- MANUAL
1s
�
.1
J
1987',
OF EDINA
CHECK
STER
02- 28 -8', AGE 5
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT ___
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION_
ACCOUNT_ NO. INV.
Q_P_.0._AMESSAGE
--
M I
049135
03/05/87
8.93-
EAGLE WINE
50- 3710 - 842-84
MANUAL
049135
03/05/87
-- -- - 13.55- - - --
EAGLE WINE -
-EAGLE
_ _ _
- 50- 3710 - 862 -86_
MANUAL
049135
03/05/87
284.95
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
i
049135
03/05/87
446.52
EAGLE WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
-
049135
_03/05/87 -
677.71
-- - -- -
EAGLE WINE
- - --
50_ 4628 - 862- 86---
MANUAL.
049135
02/23/87
59.39
EAGLE WINE
- - - --
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 842 -84
- -. -._ - --
MANUAL
1..440.39 M
ssr -CKS
049138
03/05/87
16.82-
ED PHILLIPS
50-.3710-82e-82
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
22.33-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
�j
049138
03/05/87
4.24-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710-822 -82
MANUAL
049138
_ _ - 03/05/87
_ _ 24.55-ED
PHILLIPS
-3710-842-84
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
9.13-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
_
MANUAL
--
•
049138
03/05/87
73.13-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
049138
_ 03/05/87
___
ED PHILLIPS -
50- 3710 - 862 -86.-
MANUAL-
049138
63/05/87
40.45-
ED PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
__.___
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
16.53-
ED PHILLIPS
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
5.90- __ -_ _ -
-. ED PHILLIPS -
-__50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
1,116.44
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
3,656.38
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
2,022.70
ED PHILLIPS_
_
-
049138
03/05/87
841.15
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
_MANUAL
MANUAL
•
049138
03/05/87
212.06
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
-
049138
_ _ 03/05/87
1 ,227.60 . _
-- ED PHILLIPS
-_� _ - -�
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL.
049138
03/05/87
456.40
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 842 -84
_ _ _
MANUAL
049138
03/05/87
295.13
ED PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
'
--
049138
03/OS/87..._
_ - 54.50-
ED PHILLIPS___
_
-4628- 862- 86
MANUAL_
049138
03/05/87
826.55
ED PHILLIPS
- -50
50- 4628 - 862 -86
-'
MANUAL
X049138
02/23/87
23.52
ED PHILLIPS
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842 -84
MANUAL
'
-
ssssss
sss -CKS
049190
03/05/87
14.37-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
049190
03/05/87
23.13-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
049190
03/05/87
32. 03-
- -- - - --
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C - - -_-
049190
03/05/87
718.65
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626- 822 -82
---.-.MANUAL
MANUAL
-
049190
03/05/87
1,156.29
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
049190
03/05/87
1,601.57
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
50- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
�-
049190
02/23/87
4.20-
6RI66S COOPER'
DISCOUNT
50- 4632 - 822 -82
MANUAL
' ,049190
02/23/87
25.45
GRI66S COOPER
INVENTORY
50 -4632- 842-84
MANUAL
3,428.23 s
rsssss
*00-CKS
049435
03/05/87
2.72-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
049435
03/05/87
4.77-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
049435
03/05/87
-__ _ 6.67 -
_PRIOR _WINE _CO
50- 3710 - 862- 86
_ MANUAL
049435
03/05/87
135.95
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
•
049435
03/05/87
03/05/87
238.70
333.38
PRIOR WINE CO
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
I,
_049435 -
049435
--
02/23/87
30.00
PRIOR WINE
INVENTORY
_50 =4628- 862_ -86
50- 4632 - 622 -82
- MANUALj�
MANUAL
723.87 •
.1
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 6
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ _ - VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE —
rrrwrr
049451
03/05/87
1.61-
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
7.32 -
QUALITY
WINE
049451
- 03%05/87 -
-- - -- -- - 1 .28- --
-- QUALITY
WINE-- -
0494S1
03/05/87
47.79-
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/OS/87
4.33-
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
43.85---"-'
_
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
364.53
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
2,385.78
QUALITY
WINE
049451
_ _
03/05/87
_ _
2,189.50
_
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/OS/87
160.00
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
127.95
QUALITY
WINE
049451
03/05/87
_
429.40
_
QUALITY
WINE —
049540
03/05/87
5,550.98 0
— 0540
CITY
4
1
rwr -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50-3710-822-82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
_
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86 _ -_
MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
_ 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL
_50-
50 -4626- 862 -86
_
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
_ 50- 4628- 842 -84 _
—
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
4
1
*00-CKS
049540
03/05/87
- ---
67.93-
- - - - -- - - - -- - ---
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3700 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
i . T2-
0540
CITY
WINE - -- - --
-- - - - - --
- --
50- 371 0- 822 -82 ._ -
- -- - --
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
19.36-
0540�CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
- - --
5.03-
- --
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
-- 1.08- --
— 0540
CITY
WINE —
71
50- 30- 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
40.34-
0540
CITY
WINE
50-3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
_ 3.65 -•
--
0540
-0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
8.24-
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/67
.12
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
1
049540
03/05/87 _
1.23- _
—
0540
CITY
WINE
MANUAL
049540
03/OS/87
10
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
5.79-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710-862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
_ 5.79
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
3.11-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
5.79-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87 _
_ .90-
_ 0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710-862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
.23
0540
CITY
WINE
56 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
20.50-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
5.10 -
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
63.60 TWIN
CITY
WINE
___
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
y 049540
03/05/87
967.34
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
30.80
TWIN
CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
_
2,017.04
_
0540
CITY
__
WINE
_ _
50- 4626- 842 -84 —
_ _
MANUAL
* 049540
03/05/87
1,024.49
0540
CITY
WINE
SO- 4626 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
4.00
TWIN
CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50 -4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
57.60
TWIN
CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
y 049540
03/05/87
502.12
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
172.30
_ 0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
107.73
0540
_
CITY
WINE
50-4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
s 049540
03/05/87
122.60
0540.CITY
WINE
50-4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
_— - _ 6.45 --
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
824.68
6546
CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
.00
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842-84
MANUAL
049540 _
03/05/87
- 10.48- ___0540
CITY
WINE_
50-_4628- 842 -84_
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
364.40
CITY
0540
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
42.80
TWIN
CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
4
1
1987 -(
OF EDINA
CHECK
3TER
02 -28 -81 .GE 7
CHECK N0.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
6 P.O. N MESSAGE
049540
03/05/87
579.95-
0540 CITY WINE
50- 4628- 862-86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
, _ 579.95
0540 CITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- __.
_ MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
510.69
0540 CITY WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
j 049540
02/23/87
24.00
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87 _
_ — 90.30
-_ OS40_CITY _WINE__
___ -_
S0- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
579.95
0540 CITY WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
049540
03/05/87
11.96-
0540 CITY WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
•
. - 049540
03/05/87
_._..,- 310.75
0540 _CITY WINE
_- - - . - ,
50- 4628 - 862 -86
. __ -- . -_ - _ , - MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
159.74
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4630- 842 -84
MANUAL
049540
02/23/87
77.75
TWIN CITY WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4632- 822 -82
MANUAL
7,842.26 r
rrrrrr
*so-CKS
-
051174
02/23/87
147,000.00-
187 BANK SD
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
- 051174
02/23/87
147,000.00
1ST BANK SD
BANK TRANSFER
50- 1010 - 000 -00
MANUAL
is- _ - - -
- -- - -- - - - --
.00 r
-- - _- - - - - --
- --
-
- --
- -- - - - -- - - -- -
rrrrrr
rrr -CKS
051198
02/23/87
66,698.28-
GROUP HEALTH
CORRECTION
10- 4156 - 510 -51
MANUAL
051198
02/23/87
66,698.28
GROUP HEALTH
CITY PAD HOSP
10- 4156- S10 -51
MANUAL
-
051198
02/23/87
6,698.28
GROUP HEALTH
CITY PAD
—_
10- 4156- 510 -S1
- - -
MANUAL
6,698.28 r
--
-- - - - - -- - - - -- - - --
rrrrrr
- -.._.
- - - -- -- rrr -CKS --
051430
02/23/87
20,745.92
PERA
CITY PORTION PERA
10- 4145 - 510 -81
MANUAL
•
20,745.92 r
rrrrrr
rrr -CKS
•
' 051442
02/23/87
12,201.84
PHY HEALTH
CITY PD k6 SP
10- 4156 - 510 -S1
MANUAL
- -- -
12,201.84 r
--
ri *rir
------ - - -
-- - - - - --
--- -
- - - - --
----- -000- CKS --
•
051506
02/23/87
_ 10,241.47 _
southwest fidelity
CITY_PORTION FICA - -_.-
10- 4149 - 51.0 -51
051506
02/23/87
110.28
southwest fidelity
CITY PORTION MEDC
____
10- 4162- S10 -51
- .___ - -___. _,MANUAL _,-
MANUAL
10,351.75 r
:'•
rrrrrr
rrr -CKS
•
051700
02/23/87._ __ „__
_- __ __1 , 694.00.
US___POSTMASTER _ -__
BULK,_,MAIL_
1 0- 4802 - 600- 60
-- _ -_ _ _MANUAL
1,694.00 r
051701
02/23/87
-
- 138.00 -
U OF M _-
REGISTRATION
10 -4206- 500 -S0_
MANUAL
138.00
i
#051702 _
_ 02/23/87
191.70
LIFE
CITY PD INS
10- 4157 - 510 =51
- - --MANUAL
191.70 r
rrrrrr__
**O -CKS_-
054095
03/03/87
82.06
COMM OF REVENUE
STATE SALES TAX
10- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
r
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
054095
03/03/87
82.06
COMM
OF
REVENUE
054095
03/03/87
82.06—
COMM
OF
REVENUE
054095
03/03/87
186.42
_
COMM
OF
REVENUE
s
054095
03/03/87
321.55
COMM
OF
REVENUE
DISTRI
054095
03/03/87
265.13
CITY
OF
REVENUE__
054095
03/03/87
____COMM
66.38
COMM
OF
REVENUE
054095
03/03/87
516.95
COMM
OF
REVENUE
054095
03/03/87
61298.01
COMM
OF
REVENUE
054095
_
03/03/87
12,233.2S
COMM
OF
_
REVENUE
i 054095
03/03/87
11,166.47
COMM
OF
REVENUE
2,058.94 +
zd
31,136.25 t
+ ttt «tt
054700
03/03/87
95.00
POSTMASTER
'j
95.00 +
055067
055067
055067
055067
055067
p 055067
055067
055067
055067
055067
ITEM DESCRIPTION
GENERAL
CORRECTION
STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
__STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
STATE SALES TAX
POSTAGE
03/05/87
14.17-
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
_
03/05/87
2.00
CAPITAL
CITY
_
DISTRI
03/05/87
68.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
03/05/87
10.00
CITY
DISTRI
03/05/87
-- _ _______CAPITAL
349.90
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTR I
03/05/87
5.50
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
03/05/87
119.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
03/05/87
_
4.90
CAPITAL
CITY
-- - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - --
DISTRI
03/05/87
187.00
CAPITAL
CITY
DISTRI
03/03/87
48.75
CAPITAL
CITY
DIST INVENTORY
778.26
780.88 «
055135
03/05/87
- -- - - -- -
ti
MANUAL
10- 3357-000 -00
MANUAL
ttr «tt
MANUAL
27 -3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
055129
03/05/87
2,109.36
BELLBOY
055129
03/05/87
728.84
BELLBOY
50- 3357- 002 -00
MANUAL
e,838.20 «
- - --
y
«11«11
MANUAL
055135
03/05/87
5.62-
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
.07
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
15.57-
EAGLE WINE
s 055135
03/05/87
16.86-
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
281.15
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
7.49-
_
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
778.26
EAGLE WINE
055135
03/05/87
842.99
WINE______
055135 ,
_
03/03/87
_
34.23
____EAGLE _
EAGLE WINE - INVENTORY
s 1.055135
03/03/87
167.78
EAGLE_ WINE INVENTORY
2,058.94 +
zd
02 -28 -87 PAGE 8
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE
10- 3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
10- 3357-000 -00
MANUAL
23 -3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
27 -3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
28- 000 -00__
MANUAL__-_
_3357- _ _
29- 3357 - 000 -00
—
MANUAL
40-3357- 000 -00
MANUAL
50 -3357- 001 -00
MANUAL
50- 3357- 002 -00
MANUAL
50 -3357- 003 -00
MANUAL
ttt -CKS
10- 4290 - 510 -51 — - -_ -- -- MANUAL
I
ttt -CKS
50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 822 -82
50 -3710- 842 -84
50- 3710- 862 -86
50-4628- 822 -82
50 -4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50 -4632- 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
titt «t
-i' 055138 - 03/OS/87 — 11.81- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3 3710 - 822 -82
si 055138 03/05/87 65.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82
ttt -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
tt« -CKS 1 .4
MANUAL
MANUAL
s �
ttt -CKS
50- 3710 - 862 -86 - -_ -
- MANUAL
--
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628-822 -82
MANUAL
5074628- 842 -84 _ -_
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86 _ _. _ _
MANUAL ._ .
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4630- 842 -84
MANUAL
ttt -CKS
50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
50- 3710- 822 -82
50 -3710- 842 -84
50- 3710- 862 -86
50-4628- 822 -82
50 -4628- 822 -82
50- 4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50 -4632- 842 -84
50- 4632- 862 -86
titt «t
-i' 055138 - 03/OS/87 — 11.81- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3 3710 - 822 -82
si 055138 03/05/87 65.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82
ttt -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
tt« -CKS 1 .4
MANUAL
MANUAL
s �
055435
03/05/87
_____-.03 __
__ PRIOR
WINE
WINE
•
•- I
198Y
OF EDINA
PRIOR
CHECK STER
_CO
CO
CHECK
NO.--DATE--.
AMOUNT
VENDOR
WINE
CO
055138
03/05/87
8.52—
ED PHILLIPS
WINE
CO
055138
03/05/87
6.10 —__
ED PHILLIPS
WINE
CO
055138
03/05/87
32.68—
ED PHILLIPS
WINE
CO
055138
03/05/87
58.59—
ED PHILLIPS
WINE
055138
03/05/87
12.38—
ED PHILLIPS
WINE
_CO
CO
055138
03/05/87
4.82—
ED PHILLIPS
—_
"
055138
03/05/87
305.00
ED PHILLIPS
055138
03/05/87
— 21929.58
ED PHILLIPS
055138
03/05/87
3,279.55
ED PHILLIPS
-
"
055138
03/05/87
590.50
ED PHILLIPS
055138
03/05/87
426.20_____
ED
055138
03/05/87
____
1,633.95
_PHILLIPS
ED PHILLIPS
055138
03/05/87
240.96
ED PHILLIPS
s
- 055138
03/05/87 -
-- - 618.80
ED PHILLIPS
�
9,824.05 •
rrrrrr
.'1
055190
03/05/87
27.02-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
055190
03/05/87 _
44.02 -_ __
__ GRIGGS COOPER
AND C_____
055190
03/05/87
5.35-
GRIGGS COOPER
—_ .
AND C
055190
03/05/87
184.43-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
"I
055190
_ 03/05/87 _ _ _
1, 351 . 04
GRIGGS COOPER_
AND C
055190
03/05/87
____ _
2,200.86
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C _ -- _
055190
03/05/87
267.66
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C
. 055190
03/05/87
9,221.62
GRIGGS COOPER
AND C—
12,780.36 +
—
'
rrrrrr
05S433
03/05/87
5.60
PAUSTIS b SONS
055433
03/05/87
351.32
PAUSTIS 6 SONS
055433
03/03/87
_
51.00
PAUSTIS R SONS
'
407.92 +
055435
03/05/87
_____-.03 __
__ PRIOR
WINE
WINE
055435
03/05/87
.62-
PRIOR
WINE
_CO
CO
055435
03/05/87
2.45-
PRIOR
WINE
CO
055435
03/05/87
6.08 -____
MANUAL
WINE
CO
055435
03/05/87
31.00
__PRIOR
PRIOR
WINE
CO
055435
03/05/87
2.78-
PRIOR
WINE
CO
055435
03/05/87 _
122.25
PRIOR
WINE
055435
03/05/87
_
5.70-
PRIOR
WINE
_CO
CO
055435
03/05/87
303.75
PRIOR
WINE
CO
'
439.40 +
• rrrrrr
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
0
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
14
QUALITY
WINE
11.83-
QUALITY
WINE
13.43-
QUALITY_
WINE
14.13-
QUALITY
WINE
.24
QUALITY
WINE
INVENTORY
-- - - - -- -
02 -28 -81t .AGE 9
ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0.. INV__
-N _P_.0.-_ N MESSAGE
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86_.
____. -_ _ MANUAL
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 862 -86
. _ MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
-_ MANUAL _
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
—._ _ 50 =4628- 862 -86
_, _._._ MANUAL _
INVENTORY
-- - - - -- -
rrr -CKS --
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710- 842 -84 _ - -__
.. MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
50- 4626 - 822 -82
_ MANUAL
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
SO -4 4626- 862 -86
_ -_ _ _ - MANUAL _
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628- 862 -86
50- 4630 - 842 -84
+++ -CKS '
MANUAL '
MANUAL
MANUAL
- --
000- CKS —
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50 -3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
50 -3710- 862 -86 - --
- - -- — MANUAL--
50- 4628- 822 -82
_
MANUAL
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 4628- 842 -84 _
MANUAL
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
+++ -CKS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL '
SO- 3710 - 842 -84_
MANUAL_
50- 3710 -842 -84
_
MANUAL
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 10
CHECK NO. DATE
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
055451
AMOUNT VENDOR
03/05/87
3.44-
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
47.95-
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
_
590.60
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
704.85
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
54.44
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
_ _
54.44-
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
54.44-
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
2,394.16
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
14.37 --
_
QUALITY
_
WINE
03/05/87
303.08-
QUALITY
WINE
03/05/87
WINE
QUALITY
WINE
_
03/05/87
_1,_335.25
340.75
_
QUALITY
_
WINE
03/05/87
23.96-
QUALITY
WINE
4,879.36 •
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. #-P-.-O-.---# MESSAGE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50- 3710 - 862 -86
50 -4626- 822 -82
50- 4626- 842 -84
50- 4626- 842 -84
50 -4626- 842 -84
50- 4626- 842 -84
50- 4626- 862 -86
50- 4628 - 622 -82
50 -4628- 842 -84
50-4628 - 842 -84
50- 4628 - 862 -86
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL.___
MANUAL
MANUAL
. ••••••
••• -CKS
055540-
03/05/87 -
75.35-
- 0540
CITY
WINE -
50- 3700 - 822 -82
- - --
MANUAL
.
055540
03/05/87
47.13-
0540
CITY
WINE
50 -3700- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
134.16-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3700 - 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
58.20-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
.85-
0540 ;CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
_ _.80-
50- 3710- 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
95-
_____0540_CITY_WINE
0540
CITY
_ _____ __
WIN _
E
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
1.75-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
_ 5.17-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
1.11-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
42.67-
0540
CITY
WINE
50-3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
.69-
_ 0540_CITY
WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
3.33-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
161.43-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
.87-
_ 0540
CITY
WINE
50-3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
26.57-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
9 055540
03/05/87
4.64-
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
1.99- _
0540
CITY
WINE
50 -3710- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
2.80 --
0540
CITY
_
WINE -
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
21909.80
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 822 -82
MANUAL
,
055540
03/05/87
2,133.60 _
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
8,070.69
0540
CITY
_____ _ _
WINE
50-4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
1,328.35
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
232.06_ _
___0540
CITY
WINE
50-4626- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
93.92
0540
CITY
______
WINE
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
.00
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
85.76
0540
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
80.05
0540
CITY'WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
175.44
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
111.30
0540
CITY
_WINE__
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
517.37
0540
CITY
WINE -
50-4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
.00
0540.CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
-_ -_ .00
-- 0540
CITY
WINE__ - ____
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL___
055540
03/05/87
280.21
0540
CITY
____
WIN E
50- 4628- 862 -86
- MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
87.90
0540
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
,
055540
03/05/87 - -
- -_ 333.55
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
69.10
0540
CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
055540
03/05/87
198.74
0540
CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
w
�
I
r
. 1987 OF EDINA CHECK STER 02- 28 -8't .AGE 11
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT -- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P_0__A_- MESSAGE
______.
—I' 116,137.38 +
BRY_ENTERPR_ISES 50- 371.0- 822 -82
BRU ENTERPRISES 50 -4628- 822 -82
F.M.A.M — CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 440 -44
* ** —CKS
MANUAL ,
- - - -- MANUAL - - -- -
— — — MANUAL
*** —CKS --
T
05.7251_ — 03/03/87 -- 750,000,.00_ HRA_ -_ _ DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL _-
750,000.00 +
r
057700 03/03/87 160.80 PAYROLL ACCT.
160.80 +
058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT
058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT
20.00 +
I
_ 02/24/87 —_
061 092 - -- 02%24/87 - - -
- -- 105.88 - --
055751_
1.70 —_
_03/_05/87
ci 1055751 03/05/87
_
113.14
061508
111.44
i 055752 03/03/87
— 150.00
57.90-
150.00 +
BRY_ENTERPR_ISES 50- 371.0- 822 -82
BRU ENTERPRISES 50 -4628- 822 -82
F.M.A.M — CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 440 -44
* ** —CKS
MANUAL ,
- - - -- MANUAL - - -- -
— — — MANUAL
*** —CKS --
T
05.7251_ — 03/03/87 -- 750,000,.00_ HRA_ -_ _ DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL _-
750,000.00 +
r
057700 03/03/87 160.80 PAYROLL ACCT.
160.80 +
058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT
058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT
20.00 +
I
_ 02/24/87 —_
061 092 - -- 02%24/87 - - -
- -- 105.88 - --
- 061092 02/24/87
105.88-
.00
061508
02/24/87
061125 02/24/87
ST PAUL BOOK
57.90-
-,
57.90 —*
061508
C l S DIET INC
C 6 S DIST INC
CANCER INS
NOTARY FEE
NOTARY FEE
COST 6 V COMA
CORRECTION
10- 1015 - 000 -00
10- 4200 - 510 -51
10 -4260- 510 -51
23- 464241341 045304
23- 4642- 613 -61 045304
MERIT SUPPLY CORRECTION 28-4512- 702 -70 16176
— * ** -CKS
MANUAL
*** —CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
* ** —CKS
* ** —CKS
— * ** —CKS - --
- _061508
_ 02/24/87 —_
6.95 —_
ST_ PAUL _BOOK
CORRECTION
061508
02/24/87
6.95
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 133 -12
371418
061508
02/24/87
4.26—
ST PAUL BOOK
GENERAL SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 133 -12
371418
_ 061508 _
_ --02/24/87----
4226 --
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN_SUPPLY
10- 4504- 133 - 12371418-
— *** * * *
- - - -- — --
- - - --
* ** —CKS
061526
02/24/87
284.13
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10-4612 - 560 -56
440670
061526_
—'I
- -___ 02/24/87
284.13-
TRACY OIL
CORRECTION
10 -4612- 560 -56
440670
^
00
—
*** —CKS 17:,
— ;,I
�.
063067
03/05/87
9.00
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL 749
'7 J•
i 1 0 .
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT
_12 063067 03/05/87 321.87
063067 _03/05/87 _ _ _ _ 11.00
063067 03/05/87 377.84
719.71 +
CHECK REGISTER
---VENDOR
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITAL CITY DISTRI
CAPITACCITY DISTRI
02 -28 -87 PAGE 12
ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
50- 4628 - 642 -84 MANUAL ;
50- 4628- 862 -86 -----MANUAL
50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL
�I 063135
03/05/87
35.37-
- --
EAGLE
WINE_
3710 - 822 -82
� 063135
03/05/87
10.99 -
-EAGLE
__
1JINE -
_ - - -50-
50 -3710- 842 -84
_ 063135
03/05/87
36.48-
EAGLE
WINE
50- 3710 - 862 -86
_ 063135 _
_ 03/05/87
1,_768.70
EAGLE
WINE_
50-4628- 822 -82
06313S
03/05/87
__
S49.45 -
EAGLE
WINE __
50- 4628 - 842 -84
_ 1 063135
03/05/87
1,824.08
EAGLE
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
4,059.39 +
�,i rrrrr+
063138
063138
063138
663138
063138
063138
063138
063138
063138
063138
063138
__063138
063138
063138
063138
063138
063138
X063138
rrr + +r
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/81
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/05/87
03/04/87
03/04/87
40 12- '
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
4.84-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 822 -82
- 20.38-
ED
PHILLIPS__
50- 3710- 842 -84
70.94-
ED
___ _ ___
PHILLIPS -
__
50- 3710 - 842 -84
4.45-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 842 -84
59.07- _ --
ED
—
PHILLIPS_
50- 3710 - 862 -86
35.38-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710- 862 -86
10.73-
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 3710 - 862 -86
-- 3,546.88
- --
- ED
PHILLIPS -
50- 4626- 842 -84
2, 953.31
ED
PHILLIPS - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- --
50- 4626-862 -66
2,005.95
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 822 -82
242.24
- - -_ - - -�
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628- 822 -82
1 , 019.1 1.
ED
PHILLIPS _ -- - —
50- 4628- 842 -84
222.25
ED
PHILLIPS
50- 4628 - 842 -84
-- _1,768.95__ - - - - --
ED
PHILLIPS
50 -4628- 862 -86
536.57
ED
PHILLIPS —
50- 4628 - 862 -86
6'1.76
ED
PHILLIPS INVENTORY
50- 4630 - 622 -82
— - _76.40
-� —
ED
-- --
PHILLIPS INVENTORY
50-4630- 842 -84
12, 189.51
_ 03/05/87 _
- -- - - - --
-- - — - --
i'
!F!- CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
+ ++ -CKS
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL _
MANUAL "
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
MANUAL
+r+ -EKA
063190
03/05/87
5.20-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND
C 50- 3710- 842 -84
MANUAL
063190
03/05/87__________
5. 1 .08- ___-GRIGGS
COOPER
AND
C 50-3710-84e-84
MANUAL
-
063190
03/05/87
6.42-
GRIGGS COOPER
AND-C-
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
'
063190
03/05/87
2,553.92
GRIGGS COOPER
AND
C 50- 4626- 842 -84
MANUAL
063190
03/05/87
-
_.. 259.80 _
-- GRIGGS COOPER
AND
C 50- 4626 - 842 -84
MANUAL._—
_
063190
03/05/81
320.89
GRIGGS COOPER
AND
_ __ -- --
-
C--' — _- 50-4626- 862 -86
-- -
MANUAL
3,071.91 +
- - -
- --
+wrrrr
- -- - - ---
r**-CKS
'
063435
_ 03/05/87 _
3.26- —
PRIOL WINE CO,
_—
50 -3710- 822 -82
MANUAL____
063435
03/05/87
10.53-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710- 842 -84
_ _____
MANUAL
063435
03/05/87
4.03-
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 3710 - 862 -86
MANUAL
063435 _
03/05/87
—
162.90
_PRIOR WINE CO
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
„1d
(7.'
063435
03/05/87
526.59
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
063435
03/05/87
E01.50
PRIOR WINE CO
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
"I'
- --
—1ST7
o
•
• 1987` OF EDINA CHECK STER 02- 28 -8'1 AGE 13
i
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _VENDOR_ ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT _NO. I -NV_f P _0._N_ MESSAGE _ -_—
063435 03/04/87 111.41 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL
063435 __03/04/87 _ —_ _y — _49.E8 EAGLE _WINE — INVENTORY _ —_ 50- 4632- 842- 84 _ _ _ - MANUAL
063435 03/04/87 66.44 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL
1,100.30 •
•*• —CKS
063451 _ 03/05/87 04 —__— ___.,QUALITY. WINE — —_.— 50- 3710- 822- 82__.______ MANUAL
063451 03/05/87 — 3.65— QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL
063451 03/05/87 10.99— QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL
=i _063451 03/05/87 18.57- ______ QUALITY
.._.__ _ 50- 3710 - 842- 84 MANUAL
063451 03/05/87 - - 17.22- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL
063451 03/05/87 .68 QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL
063451 _ _ 03/05/87 - - -_- 1 0.83__ - QUALITY _WINE ,. _. -,- __50-371 0- 862- 86._._______._ MANUAL
ht063451 03/05/87 548.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL
'I U x063451 03/05/87 540.46 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL
t�y063451 -_ 03/05/87 — _- 3.87- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL
x,063451 03/05/87 362.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL
063451 03/05/87 1,841.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL
063451 _ 03/05/87 .____ _1,706.65 `_ _QUALITY WINE _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 ___ MANUAL
?I 063451 03/05/87 6.76— QUALITY IN
WE BO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL
4,928.75 •
1 =,
-- --
� Myis 000— CKS --
063540 03/05/87 _. _ 39.60— CITY WINE
,� _ 50- 3700 - 822 -82._ ____MANUAL ._
063540 03/05/87 125.03— 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 5.04— 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL is
063540 _.___03/OS/87 _ ! 6.25 -_ __ 0540_CITY_WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82_ MANUAL__
063540 03/05/87 .43 0540 CITY WINE ---
so MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 .64 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 _ 03/05/87 _ 4. 15- 0540 CITY WINE 50 -371 0- 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 4.38- 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 .03 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 OE 054_0_ CITY WINE 50- 3_710- 842 -84 MANUAL__
063540 03/05/87 104.79- 0540 CITY _ WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 8.31- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 8.21- 50- 3710 - 842- 84 MANUAL
__OS40_CITY_WINE__ S`
063540 03/05/87 9.99- 0540 CITY WINE
50-3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL -
063540 03/05/87 16.98- 0540 CITY WINE
50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87_ _ .02 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ _ MANUAL I'
063540 03/05/87 02- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL '
063540 03/05/87 8.58- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 34.16_ -0540 CITY WINE
- _.. _.._ ..____ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL -__�•_
063540 03/05/87 .28 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL I'
063540 03/05/87 1.65- 0540 CITY WINE SO- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I ,
063540 _ - 03/05/87 7.51 -_ 0540_ CITY _WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 _ ____MANUAL _I
063540 03/04/87 22.40 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �_..
063540 03/05/87 2.88 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 __03/05/87_ 5,239.62 0540_CITY_WINE_ 50 -4626- 842 -84 __ MANUAL.-
063540 03/05/87 849.05 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 1,708.57 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL ,,•
063540 03/05/87 437.64 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 414.35 0540 CITY WINE 50-4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL
063540 03/05/87 503.32 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 — MANUAL
s ,
- - - -- - - - 7C
d
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK
REGISTER
02 -28 -87 PAGE 14
.I
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR --
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
N P.O. • MESSAGE
_,21
03/05/87
43.63—
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL I,
�,
063540
—
03/05/87 _
--
_ _ 3.87—
—
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87
65.20-
_
0540 CITY
WINE
_
50- 4628 - 822 -82
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87
625.57
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 822 -82
I:
MANUAL
6
063540
03/05/87
.00
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 822 -82
MANUAL
063540
____
03/05/87
_
821.39
__
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
MANUAL
Bi
063540
03/05/87
2.88—
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
9;
063540
03/04/87
- -
-- — 89.20
_ TWIN CITY
WINE
INVENTORY
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87
2.88—
0540 CITY
-
WINE --
-- — - - --
50 -4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
'
063540
03/05/87
.00
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628- 842 -84
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87_—
-- S29.14
0540 CITY
WINE
50-4628-842-84
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87
998.59
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 842 -84
_
MANUAL
063540
03/05/87
749.83
0540 CITY
WINE
50 -4628- 862 -86
MANUAL
-
063540
03/05/87 —
- - -- 29.48-
0540 CITY
WINE_______
4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL '2
063540
03/05/87
858.28
0540 CITY
WINE
_50-
50- 4628 - 862 -86
— MANUAL =
,171
'063540
03/05/87
165.1E
0540 CITY
WINE
50- 4628 - 862 -86
MANUAL
13,783.78
— 804,673.35
FUND 10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
;.
=
186.42
FUND 23
TOTAL
ART CENTER
321.55
FUND 27
FUND 28
TOTAL
TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
Hand typed checks li's 75803
— _
—207.23
__
_ _RECREAT_ION CENTER FUND
t ru�5903
66.38
FUND 29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
T
516.95
FUND 40
TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
168,574.37
FUND 50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
s (,i
i
994,546.25
TOTAL
s ,
- - - -- - - - 7C
d