Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-03-16_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MARCH 16, 1987 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL MINUTES of HRA Meeting of March 2, 1987 approved as submitted or corrected by motion of , seconded by I. AWARD OF BID - Demolition and Removal of Buildings (Coritd from 3/2/87) ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL FLAG CEREMONY -= friendly Bluebirds - Countryside School (Camp Fire) PROCLAMATION - Camp Fire Birthday Week RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - Bower Hawthorne I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular-Meetings of February 23 and March 2, 1987 and Amendment of MINUTES of August 4, 1986 PUBLIC HEARINGS ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation hearing. If vote to pass by City Manager or Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/4 favorable rollcall if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter Improvement No. BA -264 - West 50th Street from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue (Contd from 3/2/87) B. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -37 Vernon Avenue from Interlachen Blvd to Villa Way C. Traffic Signal Improvement No. 87 -5 Link Road and Vernon Avenue D. Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter Improvement No. P -BA -278 — Link Road from Eden Avenue to Vernon Avenue IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the 'Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Plat Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/4 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat ADDroval 1. Lot 5, Muir Woods - Robert Griffith - Generally located north of Braemar Blvd and east & west of Valley View Rd (Contd from 3 /2 /87- Coritinue:to 4/20/87) 2. John Laurent and Associates - Generally located north of West 78th Street and east of Marth Road 3. DCI Second Addition - Generally located south of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road 1� Agenda Edina City Council - 3/16/87 Page Two IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS (CONTD) 21 B. Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Shadow Hill Townhomes - Generally - Strategic Planning 8:00 located north of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Court Braemar C. Final Development Plan - Midwest Federal Building Expansion - Located at Apr 6 3100 West 66th Street Council D. CDBG Program Budget for Year XIII (1987) V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS * A. (2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Remodeling (Contd from 312187) * B. Traffic Paint p.m. C. Reconstruction of 1977 Ford General LS9000 Pumper VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS 28 A. Vierkant's Composting Proposal for Morningside * B. Approval of 32 Beer License Renewals Clubhouse C. Temporary 3.2 Beer License - Our Lady of Grace Church 4 D. Agenda - Strategic Planning Retreat - March 21 Meeting E. I -494 Corridor Study Time Extention Request Council F. Report on Deer May G. Appointment to Recycling Commission VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) Report B. City Hall Space Study C. East Edina Housing Foundation Candidate D. Joint Meeting of Council /School Board X. FINANCE A. Re- funding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds * B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 3116187: General Fund $490,248.82, Art Center $2,410.56, Capital Fund $4,987.50, Swimming Pool Fund $562.00, Golf Course Fund $8,671.34, Recreation Center Fund $4,295.66, Gun Range Fund $287.11, Utility Fund $13,353.56, Liquor Dispensary Fund $54,657.60, Total $579,474.15; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 2128187: General Fund $804,673.35, Art Center $186.42, Golf Course Fund $321.55, Recreation Center Fund $207.23, Gun Range Fund $66.38., Utility Fund $516.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $188,574.37, Total $994.546.25 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Sat Mar 21 Council Retreat - Strategic Planning 8:00 a.m. Braemar Clubhouse Mon Apr 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Apr 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Tues Apr 28 VOLUNTEERS RECOGNITION 5:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse Mon May 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon May 11 Board of Review 5:00 p.m. Council Room Mon May 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council.Room I MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MARCH 2, 1987 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the H.R.A. Meeting of February 23, 1987 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF BUILDINGS CONTINUED TO MARCH 16. As recommended by Manager Rosland, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Turner to continue the award of bid for demolition and removal of buildings to the meeting of March 16, 1987. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion carried. Executive Director REOUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Housing & Redevelopment.Authority of Edina FROM: Gordon Hughes, Executive Director H.R.A. VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: February 26, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Contract #87 -5 (ENG) Building Demolition & Removal 5106 & 5120 Brookside Avenue Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Neisen Tiling 2.. Holst Construction 3. Kennedy Excavating 4. Doty & Sons 5. Veit Co. 6. Carl Bolander & Sons 7. Elcon Construction Department Recommendation: Neisen Tiling HRA 1 Amount of Ouote or Bid $28,892.00 $34,150.00 $35,448.00 .$40,369.13 $46,000.00 $49,825.00 $26,700.00 H.R.A. Signature J Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid & - is not within the amount budget for the purchase. LA) John Wallin, Finance Director City Manager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager _; MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL FEBRUARY 23, 1987 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. RESERVE POLICE OFFICERS AND EXPLORER POST 925 COMMENDED. Chief Craig Swanson introduced the Edina Police Explorer Post 925 members, noting that 14 of the 22 Explorers were in attendance. During the fall of 1986, the Explorers partici- pated in a community crime prevention project by checking every house in the City for properly displayed house numbers. Approximately 150 residents were contacted concerning their need for numbers. The Explorers also installed numbers on the houses of those requesting assistance. Clearly visible house numbers are extremely - important during an emergency situation. The City of Edina commends the Edina Police Explorers for their outstanding contribution in the area of crime prevention and community service. Chief Swanson also introduced 7 of the 15 Edina Police Reserve Officers who were present and commended all of the Reserves for their outstanding and dedicated community service. Special recogni- tion was given to: Loren Hallonquist for 10 years of service and Scott Johnson for 13 years of service. Robert Moreland was recognized for distinguished and meri- torious service on November 3, 1986. On that date while at his place of employ- ment at Hennepin County Medical Center he responded to a female employee's cries for help who had been assaulted with a knife. After giving assistance, he gave chase and apprehended the suspect. The Council Members expressed their thanks and appreciation to the Explorers and Reserve Officers. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney. Motion carried. *COUNCIL MINUTES OF JANUARY 26 AND FEBRUARY 2, 1987 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF JANUARY 12 AND FEBRUARY 2, 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the regular meetings of January 26 and February 2 and the Special Meetings of January 12 and February 2, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL TABLED. Manager Rosland stated that Fairview Southdale Hospital staff are planning on taking their Final Development Plan back to the Community Development and Plan- ning Commission for hearing and tabling of the hearing is recommended. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to table the matter of the Final Development Plan for Fairview Southdale Hospital. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA. (Member' Turner stated that because she and her husband were active members of Colonial Church and have been involved in the church's expansion planning that she would not participate in the hearing on the Conditional Use Permit and left the meeting.) Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered place on file. Phil Dommer, Planner, presented the request of Colonial Church of Edina,'generally located north of the Crosstown Highway and west of Tracy Avenue, for a Conditional Use Permit. The permit would allow a major expansion of the church facility for educational activities, a multi - purpose gymnasium area and a media center. The church requests permission to add approximately 37,000 square feet of building to the site and an additional 146 parking stalls. The proposed addition will for the most part lie to the south of the existing building with a small addition to the west. Additional parking will be located primarily on the southeasterly portion of the site. Mr. Dommer pointed out that one of the most favorable features will be the addition of a southerly entrance. It is hoped that the new entrance will make the new parking area more accessible to the members of the church and that on- street parking will be decreased. The request was heard by the Community Deve- lopment and Planning Commission on January 7, 1987 and the item was continued to allow time for a traffic analysis and parking study to be done as well review by the Nine.Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). The large pond located on the church site is subject to a DNR permit. The project is also subject to a permit by the Nine Mile Watershed District. At that time, Colonial Church retained Benshoof and Associates to conduct the traffic study. Some of the recommendations of the study involved sight line distances, additional signage and traffic control for special events. Upon receiv- ing satisfactory evidence that the appropriate permits were to be granted by the Watershed District and the DNR, the Planning Commission again reviewed the pro- 2/23/87 posal on January 28, 1987. The Commission recommended approval of the Condi- tional Use Permit subject to the following: 1) That the church enter into a proof of parking agreement consisting of a fixed annual review, and 2) Receipt of the DNR permit. Since that time, a revised site plan has been submitted which the Commission did not review. Mr. Dommer presented graphics of the new site plan pointing out that the basic change has been the combination of parking areas with some alteration of the ponding area. The site plan was changed in response to recommendations and conditions imposed by the DNR. Mr. Dommer said that parking for the site meets Ordinance standards. Colonial Church estimates a maximum seating capacity in the largest area of 950 people. By the Ordinance standards that would require 317 parking stalls and the site plan provides approximately 675 parking stalls. Larry Laukka, chairman of the Colonial Church building committee, was present to represent the church. Also present were James Benshoof of Benshoof and Associates, Inc. and James Goulet, civil engineer, who worked on the original development of Colonial Church as well as the expansion plan. Mr. Laukka explained that the primary purpose for expanding the.facility was to meet the needs that the church examined and identified.back in the 1970's when the church was located on Wooddale Avenue. It was anticipated then that to answer the long term needs the church would need in excess of 80,000 square feet of space. The facility was designed to accommodate all of those future uses.-but because of lack of funds the plan was scaled back to the existing facility of approximately 43,000 square feet. He said the church is now expanding into counseling services which exceeds the present capacity of the facility and there is also a need for additional space for educational purposes and storage area. Seating in the santuary will be increased to a maximum. of 1170 people if a ratio of 18 inches per person is used. Mr. Laukka said they have also addressed the question of traffic and need for additional parking. The expansion plan revises the north parking lot to increase the parking capacity there and essentially doubles the size of the south parking lot. The key to the development plan is that essentially the church has been oriented towards the north. Traffic has come from the north and from.the south and some overflow parking on Olinger has resulted. Mr. Laukka said that to address that problem, a south entrance to the building is proposed and the way the building will be used in its expansion mode will encourage parking on the southerly lot. To accomplish this the pond will have to be modified and a bridge will be constructed so that people can access the facility from the south parking lot. Mr. Laukka then gave a brief slide presentation illustrating the proposed expansion in scale model form from all sides of the site, pointing out the expansion details. He noted that concerns have been raised as to: 1) the ability to retain storm water on the site, and 2) parking and traffic management. In.working with both the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the DNR, the ponding area has been reworked so that the site will retain the same amount of storm water as it was required to retain in 1976 when the church was built and the island will remain as a habitat for ducks and geese. The issue of parking and traffic has been addressed. Parking has been analyzed on a number of occasions last Fall using typical. Sundays and Thursdays when the church has peak activity. Management of parking on the site was evaluated and a draft proposal has been developed for annual reviewal. Parking will be retained as best the church.can on the site and on Colonial Way, refraining from parking on Olinger Boulevard or Tracy Avenue, and attempting to relieve traffic con - gestion on the ramp at Tracy coming from the Crosstown. Parking could be expanded on the site if needed at some future time. Bill Johnson, 5816 Olinger Boulevard, presented a document signed by residents of the area. He said the issue of the residents was not the validity, need, extent or nature of the church expansion but the issue is parking and traffic manage- ment, proper procedure in filing for permits, and whether the Planning Commission followed legal procedure in the hearing process. Attorney Tom Erickson said that this had been brought to his attention and it was his understanding that the Planning Commission did have two conditions for further consideration of the matter; that subsequently the Planner did bring the matter back to the Commission with the statement that he had been advised that a DNR permit was ready to be issued and that the traffic con- sultant had made their report. On the basis of that statement the Commission voted to rehear the matter. Mr. Erickson opined that, based on these facts, that the Planning Commission did properly hear the matter. They imposed the conditions and by subsequent vote after report of the Planner they decided to hear the matter. Mr. Johnson then presented the issues raised in the document as follows: 1) communications, 2) validity of traffic studies, 3) plans to improve traffic and flow control, 4) neighborhood relations between the church and residents, 5) .traffic control in case of emergency, 6) watershed district issues, 7) damage to property because of pile driving and 8) future expansion of church. Response by representatives of Colonial Church was as follows. Skip Goodmundson, Administrator, said that the invitation to the first meeting held by the church was sent to the same mailing list as the City sent notice of public hearing, which list was up- _4 2 -23 -87 dated by the secretary of Nine Mile Village Association. For those not able to attend, they were invited to stop at the church for information on the proposed expansion. Mr. Benshoof stated that they performed a detailed park- ing and traffic analysis to address the questions raised and that although traffic counts were taken on only two Sundays, they did not rely solely on those counts but reviewed attendance data for the church for a full year to see how it fluctuated and adjusted the results of the parking counts to represent the 85th percentile highest event day and concluded the maximun need for parking is 494 parking stalls. With regard to the difficulty of getting out of the driveways for residents on Olinger Boulevard, Mr. Benshoof said a suggest- ion was made at the Planning Commission meeting that the City consider the installation of guide sign on Tracy Avenue to direct church traffic to use Colonial Way. About traffic delays at Tracy /Crosstown, the study found there are indeed some traffic delays but that they generally are within normal limits and not excessive. Special off -duty police patrol is provided by the church at.peak times. The study made two suggestions: 1) that the sight distance be improved at the northwest corner of the intersection of Tracy /Crosstown, and 2),that additional street lighting be added to the intersection to improve nighttime visibility. Mr. Goulet stated that the changes in the site plan were in response to conditions imposed by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for issuance of the DNR permit. Prior to actual construction, the plan will be re- submitted to the Watershed District for final review. The basic require- ment is storage of storm water, i.e. volume and area. With regard to the concern of damage from pile driving, Mr. Goulet said the process has certain limitations imposed on it in terms of acceleration and frequency and those standards were developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines and represent threshold values of cosmetic damage. For this project that will include an inventory of the structures that might be affected prior to start of construction (visual observation and photos) and seismic data that would occur during construction would be recorded. After construction is completed those same structures would be viewed once again to see if there is any damage. Mr. Laukka said that the residents of Nine Mile Village have been told by the church that pile driving is noisy, it does shake the earth and that to protect the church and the neighbors their properties will be photo- graphed prior to construction and then following construction and that the church will respond if there are any problems. Noise will be regulated in terms of starting and stopping each day and by specifications in the contract. As to future expansion of the church facility, Mr. Laukka said they are essentially prepared to sign off at this point on the main structure; that they have maximized the impact the facility can make on the site and the impact it can make witha.:n the Watershed District. He pointed out_ that there is a process for further additions to the site if that is proposed at some future time. Dale Stroud, resident and board member of Nine Mile Village, stated they have had good cooperation from the church representatives at various meetings; are not concerned but have asked for a letter concerning liability; and are generally supportive of the project. Carol Rothe, 6105 Arbour Lane, said she was more concerned about traffic resulting from activities at Countryside Park than that generated by the church and that there was much positive attitude in the area regarding the church. Bruce Botten, 6248 Sandpiper Court, said he and his mother live in the building closest to the church and that the building has constructural problems. His mother bought the property in November of 1985 and it has a history of ground water and foundation problems dating back to when the church was first built. Footings and the foundation are in a state of constant movement. He said they were concerned that the pilings for the church will affect expansion of the sub- soil and ground water. His mother has requested that the church provide insurance to cover structural losses that may occur and she also requested that the church provide.funds for her to hire a consulting engineer to protect her. She also requests that the church provide insurance to cover any physical losses of possessions within the interior of her townhouse as a result of the driving of pilings for construction. She also requested that pilings be driven only during normal daylight hours. Mr. Botten concluded that they have no problem with the church expansion, that the church is a good neighbor and they are only concerned about the short and long time effect to their building and the damage that may occur as a result of the construction. In response Mr. Laukka said that basically the church's position is that they want to be sure that the construction activity does not do any damage. If it does, it is the church's responsibility. He -- reiterated that the church would be sure the contractors and subcontractors would have the necessary specifications and standards, that seismic monitoring points will be placed between the church and Nine Mile Village, and that the church has been advised that there will be no damage to any property, but if it should occur the church will take care of it. Speaking in support of the project were t Ruth Miller, 6330 Red Fox Lane and Wal Miller, 6201 Tracy Avenue. Mr. Miller suggested that a traffic light at Tracy and the Crosstown would alleviate some of the traffic problems. Member Richards asked for a clarification of the parking agreement. Mr. Dommer explained that this is unusual for church property and that the intent is that, though we recognize that they have exceeded Ordinance requirements for parking, should there be a problem based on residents' concerr_, 2/23/87 by entering into the agreement the church would provide additional parking or additional measures to control traffic. Mr. Laukka commented that the church offered to enter into the agreement as they feel it is in their best interests to manage the traffic on the site. Member Richards then asked about the = -recommendation to improve ingress and egress from Colonial Way. Mr. Laukka explained that the traffic consultant has suggested that the three mature pine trees which block the vision to the north for west- bound vehicles on the Crosstown which are exiting onto Tracy be removed. The trees are located on City property and should be considered for removal. The other issue is installation of a guide sign on the corner of Colonial Way and Tracy which would be located on park property to identify the route to Colonial Church. Member Richards suggested this be handled through the Traffic Safety Committee and that the church be responsible for any costs incurred in'carrying out the recommendations to which Mr. Laukka agreed. Member Smith commented that a traffic signal at Tracy and the Crosstown would come under the jurisdiction of Hennepin County. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that presently there are no warrants for a traffic signal. In response to Member Smith, Mr. Hoffman said that there is no precedent for posting of a private sign on public lands. Member Richards then commented in support of the project that when the church acquired the property we recognized the size of the site and that it is an appropriate use of the site; that there are no variances requested; that the parking agreement will address future concerns as to parking and traffic control; that the appropriate permit must be in place before construction can begin; and the concerns expressed regarding structural damage will be a private matter between the church and property owners. Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to execution of the proof of parking agreement by Colonial Church and receipt of the DNR permit: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Colonial Church of Edina for building expansion. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Courtney ResoY,htion adopted. (Member Turner returned to the meeting at this point on the agenda.) PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Dommer presented the petition for preliminary plat approval for Warden Acres Dahle Replat generally located south of Grove Street and west of Garden Avenue.- The property is currently developed with two single family lots containing approx- imately 52,000 square feet. He recalled that similar proposals for the property were-heard by the Council on May 19 and September 15, 1986. On those occasions two single family lots were proposed with lot widths of 72.8 feet each. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot width of 75 feet so both were sub - standard lots. Both of those proposals identified the southerly area.of the parcel as outlots. Mr. Dommer advised that the proponent has returned with a new.;.modified proposal for the property. Lot 1, Warden Acres, Peterson Replat (Lot 3, directly to the east) has been added to the plat. This lot has approxi- mately 101 feet of frontage on Garden Avenue and 120 feet of depth along Grove Street. The proposed plat takes 4.4 feet-of the depth of this lot and adds it to the width of Lots 1 and 2 of the proposed plat. Lot 3 then becomes non - conforming since it no longer provides the required depth of 120 feet. All three lots conform to all other Ordinance requirements. The southerly portion of the property would be platted an an unbuildable outlot as in previous proposals. This matter was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission on January 28, 1987, and noting the elimination of setting an undesirable precedent by granting approval to two substandard lots, Lots 1 and 2 would now be conforming, and noting that there would be additional spacing between dwellings they recommended approval of the preliminary plat with these conditions: 1) Sub- division dedication fee and 2) payment of utility connection charges. Member Kelly asked if approval would allow Oak Lane to be extended at some time in the future. Mr. Dommer replied that it does not prohibit or encourage the extention of Oak Lane, except that the extention would permit development of two additional lots. Member Richards raised the question of the one year restriction before this matter could be brought back for hearing.. Attorney Erickson explained that the one year restriction following denial applies only to rezoning requests and does not apply to platting. Member Turner asked if there are any existing lots in this neighborhood which are substandard as to 2/23/87 depth. Mr. Dommer responded that within the general area there are no sub- standard lots. Tory Dahle, the proponent, commented that at the previous meet- ing it was suggested that perhaps a neighbor would be willing to sell some land to be added to the proposed plat to bring the lot widths up to Ordinance requirements. Mr. Dahle said that he has contacted the owner of Lot 3 and he has agreed to sell approximately 4 feet which would address the concern raised by the Council with regard to setting a precedent by approving substandard lots. James Peterson, owner of the subject Lot 3, said he has agreed to sell 4 feet of his property to Mr. Dahle. Mr. Peterson recalled that about six years ago he had addressed the Council with regard to a subdivision he was proposing in con- junction with his neighbor across the street which is now Garden Avenue. The neighborhood at that time was composed of four older homes which were deteriorat- ing, many acres of land and a dirt street. Unfortunately, Mr. Peterson said they could not develop the entire neighborhood and developed only those parcels they owned. There are now ten new homes and a new street and three of the four older homes have been rehabilitated. He said that the plat proposed by Mr. Dahle is the means for rehabilitating the remaining older home. The problem is that the lot sizes originally laid out are too big, and yet when subdivided are too small and it has created a conflict as how to properly use the land. Mr. Peterson stated that the proposed plat is the proper use of the land and will afford proper use for the third section of development in due course along the proposed Oak Lane. With regard to the reduced lot depth of his lot, Mr. Peterson said it is a large lot and the four feet to be sold is excessive driveway width and he felt it would not have a negative effect on the neighborhood. There being no further comment, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) payment of a subdivision fee and 2) payment of utility connection charges: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Warden Acres Dahle Replat ", platted by Dahle Brothers, Inc., and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 23, 1987, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Mayor Courtney. Member Turner commented that she could not support the request because a sub- standard lot will be created, there is no hardship which would justify approval, and that denial of the plat here will not prevent ultimate replatting of the lots north of Benton Avenue. Following further discussion, Mayor Courtney called for the rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Courtney Nays: Richards, Turner Resolution adopted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH) CONTINUED TO 3/2/87. As recommended, motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith to contiaue the public hearing on the preliminary plat for Lot 5, Muir Woods to the meeting of March 2, 1987. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to approve the appointment of Eugene Davis as Assistant Weed Inspector for the year 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. APPOINTMENTS TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS AND COUNCIL LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS CONTINUED TO 3/2/87. Because of the large number of candidates interviewed by the Council for openings on advisory boards and commissions, the Council Members informally agreed to continue the matter of appointments as well as Council liaison assignments to the meeting of March 2, 1987. REPORT GIVEN ON ARNESON ACRES PARK AGREEMENT. Manager Rosland recalled that the Edina Park Board had made.a study as to a permanent home for the Edina Historical Society. That study recommended that the Arneson home in Arneson Acres Park be considered which led to conversations with the Edina Garden Council which presently is working out of the Park. Over the past months a master plan has been developed for Arneson Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of the facility by the Garden Council and the Historical Society. The Park Board has approved the Arneson Acres Park Master.-,Plan in concept, the preliminary agreement between the Garden Council and the Historical Society and the Arneson Acres Museum Plans in concept and are recommending approval by the Council. Robert Kojetin, Park Director, advised that Jim Robin, architect, was hired to develop the master plan design for Arneson Acres Park. He then showed graphics of the master plan for the Park and pointed out.the main areas including the Arneson home, the lake area, 2/23/87 the formal garden area (which had been designed in concept by Mr. Arneson), the forested area, the parking area and the path system through the Park. He noted that these areas are designed in concept only now and the plan -will need to.be refined as the Park is developed. Mr. Kojetin said that the mainte- nance building - -needs repair and that the City's capital budget has scheduled money two years from now to upgrade the building. He introduced Foster Dunwiddie of Miller Dunwiddie Associates who has prepared plans for the renova- tion of the Arneson home. Mr. Dunwiddie said that he has been meeting with the Garden Council and the Historical Society over several months to reflect in the design of the house the needs of both groups. He presented graphics showing the orientation of the house to the immediate grounds surrounding it and then showed floor plans for the terrace level to be used by the Garden Council and the first floor level to be used by the Historical Society. The renovation and expansion of the Arneson House is proposed to be done in two phases. Phase I improvements to the house would make a number of changes on both the terrace level and the first floor level which were explained in detail. Phase 2 of the project provides for an expansion of the house to the northeast. The first floor of the expansion would include an.office /reception area, exhibit space, and an entry lobby. The lower level would include collection storage and restrooms. Mr. Dunwiddie concluded his presentation by stating that it is felt this would be an appropriate use of the facility. Mr. Rosland said that the Garden Council and the Historical Society have drafted an agreement to be executed with the City which defines usage by each group under the Phase I construction, user fees and building operations. When Phase II is completed the agreement provides for joint use of the living room /library on the first floor level. The agreement also provides for a scheduling plan for the facility. As to funding, Mr. Rosland submitted that Phase I is estimated at $35,000 and staff would recommend that money come from the Developer's Fund. Phase II has been targeted as a goal of the 1988 Edina Centennial to raise $250,000 and the Centennial Commission is ready to proceed with that challange upon Council approval. Mr. Rosland pointed out that Phase I would also require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit which would have to go through the normal hearing process of the Council. In summary, Mr. Rosland recommended for Council approval: 1) concept approval of the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan and the Historical Society /Garden Council building renovation and expansion, 2) expenditure of $35,000 for Phase I, and 3) Conditional Use Permit process. Member Smith then made a motion for concept approval of the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan and the Historical Society /Garden Council building and to proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Member Richards commented that all the issues should -.be discussed first. He said at the Park._Board meeting a question was raised about using money from the Developer's Fund for the Arneson house renovation and how much should be spent. This is the first time the Council has seen the park master plan and the renovations plans and he felt the Council should fully understand all the issues and how the two organizations would be impacted by these decisions. Jim Fenlason, president of the Historical Society, said that they have had many meetings with the Garden Council on the shared use of the building and the format for the usage considerations have been basically agreed on by both groups. He said that.the Society is excited about the prospect of a permanent home and hope to get back in business this summer to prepare for the 1988 Edina Centennial. Then they would hope to move on with Phase II with the funds raised during the Centennial. Mr. Fenlason said the Society has some limited funds they could use for Phase I but nothing close to the total cost. Bev Harris, president of the Garden Council, said they were very excited about the plan and had no disagreement with Phase I. All nine garden clubs have agreed to work with the Historical Society. Phase I calls for the removal of the stairs between the two levels and the clubs like that separation of the two areas. In response to Member Smith, Mr. Rosland explained the Conditional Use Permit process and timetable which indicated that the public hearing on the permit could be on the Council's agenda on April 20. Member Smith said that the intent of his motion was to go that far before looking at funding. Member Turner raised the question of the operating costs for the Park and if the City can afford this within the annual budget for the Park Department. Mr. Rosland clarified that the two groups would pay for the utilities and would maintain the interior of the building. The City would maintain the exterior as in the past. Member Richards said the Council - would be making some major decisions and that they needed the full opportunity to digest and discuss this and to understand all the financial obligations. Member Kelly said she supported the plan concent; that it was developed out of a philosophical condition of the Park Board who approved the plan, and that the two organizations have worked very hard on this. After further discussion, Mr. Rosland said he would have staff prepare additional information to answer the questions and issues that have been raised and would bring that back to the Council on March 2, 1987. Member Smith then withdrew his motion and Member Turner withdrew her second. No formal action was taken. 2/23/87 TEMPORARY CLOSING OF WEST 50TH STREET FOR EDINA ART FAIR APPROVED. Manager Rosland advised that a request has been received from the 50th and France Business and Professional Association to close West 50th Street to vehicular traffic from Halifax Avenue to France Avenue during the Edina Art Fair. Mark Zierden, repre- sentative for the 50th and France Business & Professional Association, said that the request would be for Saturday, June 6 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday, June 7 from noon to 5 p.m. The purpose is two -fold: 1) to create overall safety for the Art Fair by means of a controlled area for pedestrians free of the hazards of motorized traffic, and 2) to create a more festive atmosphere enchancing the overall appearance of the Art Fair. Mr. Zierden said their main concern is safety for pedestrians and that no stands or permanent objects would be placed in the street itself for any performers. As to re- routing MTC buses, Mr. Zierden said the Association would be responsible for making these arrangements and that he had contacted the MTC and they indicated they could re -route for those times. Mr. Rosland pointed out that if approved the Police Department recommended the following restrictions: 1) Closure be permitted only on Saturday, June 6 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday, June 7 from noon to 5 p.m., 2) that artists be required to set up on sidewalks, leaving the street to pedestrian traffic and that no staging or structure be placed in the street, and 3) that the Association would be responsible for making arrangements with the MTC. Motion was made by Member Smith to approve the temporary closing of West 50th Street during the Edina Art Fair as requested and subject to the restrictions recommended by the Police Department. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF STREET RIGHT OF WAY (BRAEMAR HILLS 11TH ADDITION). Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENTS FOR STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minne- sota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined, after receipt of the petition of the owners of land affected thereby that the following described easements for street, drainage and utility purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: Right of way and drainage and utility easements on and adjacent to Lots 4 and 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition. That part of Marth Court lying West of the northerly extension of the East line of said Lot 4, Also that part of the adjacent drainage and utility easement lying West of a line 10 feet West of and parallel with the East line of said Lot 4, and its northerly extensions. Subject to proposed drainage and utility easements over; The East 10 feet of the above described vacated Marth Court, Also that part lying 5 feet on either side of the South line of said Lot 5 and its easterly extension. 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, as least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in.at least three (3) public and con- spicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON- VACATION EASEMENTS FOR STREET, DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PURPOSES IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA - NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on April 6, 1987, at 7 o'clock p.m. for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easements for street, drainage and utility purposes: (Legal description as included in paragraph 1. of this resolution) All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, 2/23/87 corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. BOARD /COMMISSION APPOINTMENT PROCESS DISCUSSED. Member Smith asked how the board and commission appointments would be handled at the next meeting. After discussion it was.informally agreed that the Council members would submit their nominations to the Clerk for inclusion in next week's packets. I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT NOTED. Member Turner advised that an interim report has been placed in the Council packets on the I -494 Corridor Study in response to Member Smith's request for more background information. She asked that the matter of the study be placed on the Council Agenda for March 2. AMM FISCAL DISPARITIES STUDY DISCUSSED. Member Turner recalled that at the AMM membership meeting last Fall, that the membership voted to send the issue of Fiscal Disparities back to the committee for re- study. The committee has developed a compromise position on Fiscal Disparities which has been approved by the Board and is coming back to the membership at a special meeting on March 12. She thanked Member Kelly and John Wallin for their work on the committee. BRAEMAR SPORTS COMPLEX EXPANSION DISCUSSED. Member Richards said that at the Edina Park Board meeting on February 17, 1987, a presentation was made by Ed Howat who is coordinating the efforts to expand the Braemar Sports Complex. The suggestion was made and the Park Board concurred to form a committee comprised of individuals from the Sports Committee, the Park Board, City staff and the Council to meet and discuss the options and alternatives for funding if the project is to go forward. One of the suggestions made is that the City consider selling general obligation bonds to finance the cost of the improve- ment which is estimated at $4 Million. Member Richards said he was asked to bring this to the Council to see if they would like to participate in such a committee. Following some discussion, Member Smith made a motion that Member Richards and one other Council Member, to be appointed by the Mayor, be Council representatives on the committee to be formed to discuss the Braemar Sports Complex. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner Nays: Kelly, Courtney Motion carried. COUNCIL REMINDED OF EDINAMITE SCHEDULED FOR FEBRUARY 28. Manager Rosland reminded the Council of EDINAMITE '87 which is scheduled for Saturday, February 28 and said that tickets were still available and urged their support. MANAGER EXPRESSES THANKS FOR VACATION. Manager Rosland expressed his thanks and appreciation for his recent vacation. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 2/23/87: General Fund $196,653.60, Art Center $3,305.92, Capital Fund $3,366.16, Swimming Pool Fund $49.94, Golf Center Fund $6,807.47, Recreation Center Fund $18,562.77, Gun Range Fund $181.04, Utility Fund $25,382.80, Liquor Dispensary Fund $90,091.78, Construction Fund $393.35, Total $344,794.83; and for confirmation of payment of claims dated 1/31/87: General Fund $613,784.70, Art Center $140.77, Swimming Pool Fund $49.80, Golf Course Fund $715.39, Recreation Center Fund $346.60, Gun Range Fund $40.12, Utility Fund $378.09, Liquor Dispensary Fund $185,180.03, Total $800,635.50. There being no further business on the Council Agenda Mayor Courtney adjourned the meeting at 10:20 p.m. City Clerk 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 2, 1987 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, and Mayor Courtney. �— FLAG CEREMONY CONDUCTED BY GIRL SCOUTS; GIRL SCOUT WEEK PROCLAIMED. The meeting was opened by the presentation of the colors and the Pledge of Allegiance by the Girl Scouts from various troops. Mayor Courtney welcomed them and read the following proclamation: 75TH ANNIVERSARY PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the 75th Anniversary of Girl Scouting is a celebration of the vitality of the world's largest voluntary organization for girls; and, WHEREAS, it is•a celebration of a 75 -year commitment to meeting the changing needs of girls; and, WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a spirit of adventure that challenges Girl Scouts to learn new skills, to try new activities and to explore other cultures; and, WHEREAS, it is a celebration of Girl Scouts' gifts of service and good citizen- ship to our communities and neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, it is a celebration of a bright future for young women and for Girl Scouting; and WHEREAS, our community has been the direct beneficiary of this 75 -year tradition; and, WHEREAS, the 30,000 girl members in the Greater Minneapolis Girl Scout Council and the Girl Scout Council of St. Croix Valley will be the leaders of our future; NOW, THEREFORE, I, C. Wayne Courtney, by virture of the authority vested in me as Mayor, do urge the citizens of Edina to support the Girl Scouts in their celebration; I now proclaim this week, March 7 -14, 1987, as GIRL SCOUT WEEK IN EDINA CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith, seconded by Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda, with the exception of the removal of item V.A. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -264 WEST 50TH STREET FROM EDINA COURT:TO HALIFAX AVENUE; CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk,;; - approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer.Hoffman recalled that the Council gave concept approval to the construction of West 50th Street in March of 1985 and that the portion from Highway 100 to -Edina Court was ordered and was constructed in 1986. This hearing is for the purpose of discussing the design of the section from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue on which the Council gave concept approval to rebuild the street to the existing width. Construction costs are estimated as follows: Street Surfacing at $258,157.76, Watermain at $49,396.40, Sanitary Sewer at $6,455.68, Storm Sewer at $66,408.72 and NSP Overhead Wire Removal at $130,000.00 for a total cost of $510,418.56. The project is proposed to be funded through utility and state aid funds with no assessment to property owners. Mr. Hoffman presented the following specific engineering recommendations: A) Bury NSP power lines, B) Move North sidewalk to provide better boulevard, C) Construct retaining walls of similar materials, and D) Reforest North boulevard or plant new trees in boulevard in between existing trees with ultimate removal of existing trees. He explained that in connection with burying the NSP power lines it would be necessary to have ground mounted transformers in certain locations. It is recommended that serious consideration be given to removal of the 9 existing elm trees and then to reforest. As to timing, Mr. Hoffman presented the following: Alternate A - 1987 construction to start June 8 with completion by mid -July with postponement of the France Avenue project. Alternate B - Construction after completion of the France Avenue project - probably 1989. Mr. Hoffman said the Engineering staff would work with each property owner as the work progresses. Since notices of the public hearing were mailed, a number of phone calls have been received asking what we are proposing to do. Over the -.past two years that this project has been proposed the residents living along West 50th Street have asked that the trees be retained if possible. In response to .questions raised by. the Council regarding the France Avenue project, Mr. Hoffman explained that Minneapolis did submit the plans to the State two weeks ago. In talking with William Crawford, District 5 Engineer, he explained that it would take 17 weeks from submission of the plans until.the contract is let. That would mean the job would not start before mid -July. The project would be segmented with the portion from West 44th Street north to Excelsior Boulevard being completed in 1987 and the segment south.from West 44th Street would be completed in 1988., Mr. Crawford indicated that they are flexible and would work with Edina so that the West 50th Street construction and the France Avenue project would not be scheduled at the same time. Charles Roberts, 4919 Arden Avenue, said he has a privacy fence along two- thirds of the length of 3/2/87 his lot. On the west tip of the fence there is a hedge and a corner landscape design. He asked what would be done along his lot. He also,pointed out that storm water seems to drain into only one of the storm sewers. Mr. Hoffman replied that the fence would be left as is, the hedge would be saved, there . would be a ope—foot limestone retaining wall installed on the outer face of the hedge, and the corner landscaping would be left as is. He added that the storm sewer system will be replaced. Paul Pearson, Pearson's Restaurant, said that last year's road construction devasted many of the businesses at 50th and France. A poll was taken in January among the 50th and France Business and Professional - Association members and the majority wanted to postpone the project as long as possible. Last week a telephone poll was taken of 30 of the businesses and the majority said they needed a year off without construction for their businesses to recover. Peter Meyers, Americana Bank, said last year's con - struction hdd a negative financial impact on the businesses at 50th and France and asked that the project be postponed for a year or two so that the seasonal businesses especially could recoup their customers. Marilyn Curtis, 4400 West 50th Street, said that.consideration should be given to the residents living on West 50th Street who were literally unable to get out last summer and who would like to see this project finished as soon as possible. She also mentioned the 1988 Centennial and that events were planned for 50th & France and asked how much cost would be added if the project was delayed for two years. William Orr, 4920 Arden Avenue, asked what would happen to his driveway if the sidewalk were moved back. Mr. Hoffman said the driveway apron would be changed and that the bank on his property would be graded back or a small retaining wall could be put in. Mr. Orr added that the street has been neglected until recently, that the buses disturb the houses and that he would like to see the project done soon. Marcia Pincus:, Hagen -Daz store, said their profits were cut 50% by last year's construction, that they have a seasonal business and if West 50th Street is closed again this year they will be out of business. She suggested the project start in September so it would not cut into the summer season. Mr. Hoffman recalled that last September it rained on 16 of the 21 work days in September and had we been in the middle of the construction it would have been difficult to finish it in the construction season. Peter Griffin, owner of photo store, said they opened the store last year and barely made it through the summer. He said that if West 50th Street were to be closed again this year some businesses will not survive. Solvie West, The Bookhouse, said that as a new business owner last summer the - closure was devasting to'them and they would like another year to get back on their feet. John Olson, 5000 Arden Avenue, said that he was in favor of getting the project done as soon as possible and that delaying it for a yearML:or two will only incur more expense. He -said he sympathized with the merchants but that he felt people would find their way to the 50th and France area. Nancy Perlman, S. Michael, said she sympathized with the residents, that the area will survive another summer of construction but asked if it would survive with the same retailers there, or will some of the newer business not survive. Perry Anderson, Belleson's, said he was the president of the 50th and France Business and Professional Association and a resident of Edina. On behalf of the association he said this is a difficult decision for the Council, but that as evidenced by the merchants who have spoken the closing of West 50th Street last year for 10 weeks was a severe problem for many merchants; that closing a second year in a row is a very serious problem and that they are asking for one year of no construction. The Council then asked for more information on the following: 1) cost of delay of the project, 2) detours for the project, 3) possibility of keeping one lane of traffic open during construction, 4) what .road.projects scheduled for 1989 would get bumped, and 5) reforesting on the north side of West 50th Street. Mr. Hoffman responded that the cost of delay could involve another overlay if there was a severe winter next year estimated at $5,000. As to construction costs, there is no way to predict the oil market and costs could .go up if oil goes up. Labor costs could go up 3 to 4 %. The official detour for the project would be Wooddale to West 54th Street to France Avenue and would be signed as such. As to keeping one lane of traffic open during construction, this is not a recommended alternative by staff, but if one. lane were kept,.open it.would slow down.the. project considerably and would increase the cost. As to state aid funds,. Mr. Hoffman explained that if the funds are not used in 1987 for this project they are not lost. An additional project could be accommodated in 1989 with state aid funds. In regard to the trees, because those on the north side have been severely pruned to accommodate the power lines and will likely never fill in completely, staff feels they should be removed and replaced with trees as large as can be transplanted. Member Kelly commented that she has considered the issue for a long time, and is in charge of the Centennial events in that area and would like to see the project done before then. She added that she is sympathetic with the concerns of the merchants and that the City has been trying to keep that area vital and that the merchants have responded every time they have been approached for volunteer support. Member Kelly then made a motion to delay the construction of West 50th Street from Edina Court to Halifax Avenue for two years until 1989. Motion was 3/2/87 seconded by Member Smith. Member Turner commented that she too has thought about the issue a lot, that the Council carefully went - through many hearings two years ago to try to make the right decisions for this area. She said she intended to vote no on the motion because the additional cost of doing the project in 1989 is significant and that she felt the City should go ahead as originally planned, do it as quickly as possible and get the job done. Member Richards concurred that the project should not be postponed for two years as there may be some carry- over from the France Avenue project and we may be looking at 3 to 4 years of continuous construction. He said he felt the trees on the north side will not survive and should be replaced. He added that to maintain the street for two more years by patch work,-the cost of which would come from the general fund, did not seem to be a fair expenditure of money. He said that he thought we could respond to the concerns of all by extending the project several weeks and doing it in phases to keep the road open and that this would be a better solution than delaying the project for two years. Mr. Hoffman commented that if the trees on the north side are under consideration for removal he recommended that the matter be brought back to the Council at the next meeting as to the possibility of doing the work with some traffic being kept on the street. Member Kelly questioned if a compromise would really be workable. Following lengthy discussion, Member Richards offered an amendment to the motion to continue the matter and direct the engineer_ to bring back at the next meeting alternatives for keeping the street open during construction. Motion for amendment was seconded by Member Smith. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Mayor Courtney then called for a vote on the motion as amended. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly ' PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR WHITE OAKS 8TH ADDITION DENIED UPON ADOPTION OF FINDINGS OF FACT. Planner Phil Dommer recalled that the issue of preliminary plat approval for White Oaks 8th Addition had been heard before the Council on December 15, 1986 and that the Council had directed staff to prepare Findings for denial. The matter was placed on the February 2, 1987 Council Agenda at which time it was continued at the request of the proponent, Kenneth Monroe. Mr. Dommer advised that Findings, Decision and Reasons have been prepared in support of a decision to deny-preliminary plat approval. Staff would recommend that Council adopt the Findings and deny preliminary plat approval. Member Richards questioned if Mr. Monroe had received a copy of the Findings. Mr. Dommer stated that a copy of the Findings were mailed to Mr. Monroe on January 29, 1987 but that he did not know if Mr. Monroe had responded. Motion was made by Member Kelly to adopt the Findings, Decision and Reasons and to deny the proposed subdivision for White Oaks 8th Addition based on the Findings as presented by staff (copy attached). Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH) CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Council was advised that the proponent and an adjoining property owner are investigating the impact of private deed restrictions at the site and it is requested that this matter be continued until March 16, 1987. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing for preliminary plat approval for Lot 5, Muir Woods, to the meeting of March 16, 1987. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6938 -6940 MALONEY AVENUE. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RF.gnT.TTTTnw WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lots 14 and 15, Block 9, WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel A: The East 62.83 feet of Lot 14 and the East 62.83 feet of the South 24.00 feet of Lot 15, Block 9, "WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS ", City of Edina, Minnesota, and reserving easements of record, if any. and Parcel B: That part of the South�.,24.00 feet of Lot 15, lying west of the East 62.83 feet thereof, and, That part of Lot 14 lying west of the East 62.83 feet thereof, except that part lying southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet north of the southwest corner 3/2/87 thereof to a point on the south line of said Lot 14 distant 5.00 feet east of the southwest corner thereof, All in Block 9, "WEST MINNEAPOLIS HEIGHTS ", City of Edina, Minnesota, and reserving easements of records, if any. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6119 -6121 HABITAT COURT. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RFgnT.TTTTnm WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel A: That part of Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northeasterly of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 14 distant 45.62 feet south of the most northerly corner thereof, as measured_along said westerly line, to a point on the south line of said Lot 14 distant 64.75 feet westerly of the most easterly corner thereof, as measured along said southerly line, and reserving easements of record. and Parcel B: That part of Lot 14, Block 1, THE HABITAT, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southwesterly of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point on the westerly line of said Lot 14 distant 45.62 feet south of the most northerly corner thereof, as measured along said westerly line, to a point on the south line of said Lot 14, distant 64.75 feet westerly of the most easterly corner thereof, as measured along said southerly line, and.reserving easements of record. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless - made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET FOR VARIOUS PLANNING MATTERS. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner setting March 16, 1987 as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - Shadow Hill Townhomes - Generally located north of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Court 2) Final Development Plan - Midwest Federal Building Expansion -.3100 West 66th Street 3) Preliminary Plat Approval - John Laurent and Associates - Generally located north of West 78th Street and east of Marth Road 4) Preliminary Plat Approval - DCI Second Addition - Generally located south of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. 3/2/87 BIDS AWARDED FOR VEHICLE PURCHASES. Mr. Rosland advised that the low bidder for the 3/4 ton Van did not meet specifications and staff would recommend that the bid be rejected and that the vehicle be rebid. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner to reject all bids for one (1) 3/4 ton Van and to rebid the vehicle -T -- Ayes: Kelly, rRichards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Bids were presented for various vehicles as follows: Type /Quantity of Vehicle Bidder Bid Three 4 -door Sedans Suburban Chevrolet $10,570.79 Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recom- mended low bidders for all vehicles as presented, with award of bid for one dump truck each to North Star International and Superior Ford, who were tied for low bid. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276, BA -277, CONTRACT #87 -3 (ENG). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Public Improvements Nos. BA-272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276 and BA -277 to recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, at $155,329.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR REMODELING OF SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATIONS CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to continue the award of bid for remodeling of (2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations to the meeting of March 16, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CONCEPT APPROVAL GIVEN TO ARNESON ACRES PARK MASTER PLAN. Manager Rosland recalled that at the last meeting the Council had considered a master plan for the Arneson Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of the facility by the Garden Council and the Edina Historical Society. During the discussion a number of issues and questions were raised and the matter was continued to this meeting so that staff could prepare additional information in response as to the feasibility of the plan. Mr. Rosland noted that the report included a history of the Park, objectives of the Edina Garden Council, objectives of the Edina Historical Society, the phasing schedule for the Master Park Plan, the proposed Phase I and II improvements to the Arneson house, the joint use Operating Policies, a suggested Capital Improvement Schedule, a suggested Maintenance Operation Cost schedule for the greenhouse and gardens and Estimated Operating Expenses for the Garden Center/ Historical Society Museum. A time schedule to complete a Conditional. Use Permit for the property was also presented. The est,imated.cost to complete Phase.I for the Arneson house is $35,000 which staff recommends be taken from the developer's fund. Mr. Rosland added that if concept approval is granted then staff would proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process for a public hearing on April 20. If the Conditional Use Permit is granted it is assumed that the project would go forward. Member Kelly asked if the Permit is granted would the Council still have the chance to approve development of the gardens. `Mr. Rosland said that the Council has the opportunity to review the Capital Budget each year and to approve the capital .- expenditures for the park as it is developed. The key issue would be the Condi- tional Use Permit and approval of the $35,000 expenditure for Phase I improvement to the Arneson house. Concept approval would give the 1988 Centennial Commission Thane Hawkins 10,578.00 Superior Ford 10,999.00 Two Dump Trucks North Star International 37,497.00 Superior Ford 37,497.00 Astleford.International 37,575.00 Boyer Ford 37,650.00 Lakeland Ford 38,041.72 One 3/4 Ton Pick -up Thane Hawkins 10,897.00 Superior Ford 11,965.00 One 3/4 Ton Pick -up with Thane Hawkins 12,867.00 4 x 4 box Superior Ford 14,489.00 Two fire - engine red Suburban Chevrolet 10,570.79 4 -door Sedans Superior Ford 11,091.00 Thane Hawkins 11,237.00 One 3/4 ton Pick -up Thane Hawkins 13,267.00 4 x 4 without box Superior Ford 14,489.00 One medium duty Truck Suburban Chevrolet 20,237.22 Superior Ford 20,269.00 Astleford 20,466.00 Boyer Ford 22,576.00 Lakeland Ford 22,559.73 Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to recom- mended low bidders for all vehicles as presented, with award of bid for one dump truck each to North Star International and Superior Ford, who were tied for low bid. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. BA -272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276, BA -277, CONTRACT #87 -3 (ENG). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Public Improvements Nos. BA-272, BA -273, BA -275, BA -276 and BA -277 to recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, at $155,329.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR REMODELING OF SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATIONS CONTINUED TO 3/16/87. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to continue the award of bid for remodeling of (2) Sanitary Sewer Lift Stations to the meeting of March 16, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CONCEPT APPROVAL GIVEN TO ARNESON ACRES PARK MASTER PLAN. Manager Rosland recalled that at the last meeting the Council had considered a master plan for the Arneson Acres Park and the Arneson home based upon an anticipated joint use of the facility by the Garden Council and the Edina Historical Society. During the discussion a number of issues and questions were raised and the matter was continued to this meeting so that staff could prepare additional information in response as to the feasibility of the plan. Mr. Rosland noted that the report included a history of the Park, objectives of the Edina Garden Council, objectives of the Edina Historical Society, the phasing schedule for the Master Park Plan, the proposed Phase I and II improvements to the Arneson house, the joint use Operating Policies, a suggested Capital Improvement Schedule, a suggested Maintenance Operation Cost schedule for the greenhouse and gardens and Estimated Operating Expenses for the Garden Center/ Historical Society Museum. A time schedule to complete a Conditional. Use Permit for the property was also presented. The est,imated.cost to complete Phase.I for the Arneson house is $35,000 which staff recommends be taken from the developer's fund. Mr. Rosland added that if concept approval is granted then staff would proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process for a public hearing on April 20. If the Conditional Use Permit is granted it is assumed that the project would go forward. Member Kelly asked if the Permit is granted would the Council still have the chance to approve development of the gardens. `Mr. Rosland said that the Council has the opportunity to review the Capital Budget each year and to approve the capital .- expenditures for the park as it is developed. The key issue would be the Condi- tional Use Permit and approval of the $35,000 expenditure for Phase I improvement to the Arneson house. Concept approval would give the 1988 Centennial Commission 3/2/87 r11 a preliminary go -ahead to begin the raising of funds for Phase II. Member Kelly them moved concept approval of the Arneson Acres Park Master Plan. The motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Kelly said she would expect the Park Director to advise the Council how the Arneson Acres Park would fit into long range planning for the Park Department. Member Richards said that there is an issue that needs to be addressed. This is a dedication of land made by Morten Arneson and his wife in 1969 with certain goals and objectives that he envisioned for the future and which the Garden Council has done over the years. Now there is a second entity in the Edina Historical Society which has made a significant contribution to the City but is still a private institution. The proposal would give a private body significant control over public property. Mr. Rosland responded that he did not perceive the City giving control to either organization. Both groups are quasi - public and both function exactly the same but neither one are official wings of the City through any board or commission established by the City. What we are trying to do is find a home for two groups -that have been very active and beneficial to the community. The Council has full control of this piece of property including any buildings existing or built thereon in the future and would retain full rights to the property. Member Smith commented that he liked the proposal because it would get two active groups in a cooperative situation which would be positive for them. The Historical Society has been looking for a home for some time and this also enables the Garden Council to move forward with the fulfillment of Morten Arneson's dream for the layout and development of the park. This is an opportunity to get some organizations into the house who will be responsible and will want to keep it up. He said they_ are to be commended for their efforts in working out a shared use of the facility and that in reviewing the data he understood that they would be using the facility subject to the City's control. Member Turner said she felt this was a wonderful partnership, a good addition to the City which neither group could have accomplished alone, and that she was supportive of the project. She said the only question is that as the Council looks at the Park Department budget each year that we make sure the operating policy agreement between the groups and the City is working. As the Garden Council develops its programs in .the future they may be in a position to contri- bute to the operating costs. Phyllis Kenaston, past president of the Garden Council, said that in 1976 when this property was dedicated it was to become�a park and a garden in Edina. The Edina Garden Clubs have worked diligently towards this goal. She said she heartily endorsed the master plan that has been drawn for the Arneson Acres Park for the reason that it will contribute to fulfilling the purpose for which this property was dedicated. She urged the Council tp'give the plan their most positive consideration. Shirley Peterson said she had been a greenhouse volunteer for nine years and that the garden club members had spent alot of time working with Mr. Arneson and Mr. Kojetin, Park Director. The club volunteers spend some 500 hours each year in preparing for and conducting their annual plant sale to earn money to support their projects. The clubs also are responsible for planting the many flower beds located through- out the City and prior to this being done by the clubs the Park Department had spent approximately $5,000 per year for this.. In this way, she said the Edina Garden Council has been making a considerable contribution to the City for the past nine years. Many of the members also felt that it was Mr. Arneson's intent that his home would be available for their use. He had indicated that they had alot to learn and that he also wanted them to share their knowledge with others. Mrs. Peterson said that following the discussions with the Historical Society 70% of the Edina Garden Council membership voted to share the facility and worked with Mr. Dunwiddie on the master plan and the renovation of the house. She concluded her remarks by saying she felt the house was in excellent condition and objected to spending the money for the renovation. Jim Fenlason, president of the Edina Historical Society, said he sympathized with what had just been spoken. He said the Historical Society is in accord with the documents that have been reviewed by the Council and that they are an expression of the needs of both groups. They are looking forward to the shared use of the facility and, hopefully, in expanding it into a museum in the next few years. There being no further discussion, Mayor Courtney called for vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Manager Rosland.said staff would proceed with the Conditional Use Permit process. In response to Member Smith's question as to timing for the Centennial Commission fund raising drive, Mr. Rosland said that April 20th would be the earliest date this could be addressed following the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit. UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR. Member Turner said that included in the Council packets was the Proposed Public Participation Plan for the I -494 Corridor Study. The plan adds just one item to what was discussed before and that is the first step of individual City meetings. She explained that some of the cities wanted a briefing before they participated in a corridor -wide meeting. She asked if this 3/2/87 was the consensus of the Council. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith that the Public Participation Plan for the I -494 Corridor Study include individual City meetings as the first step. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Member Turner said the general time frame for public participation is between now and May, 1987 and that a newsletter will be issued soon to discribe the process so far on the I -494 Corridor Study. Engineer Hoffman presented graphics which summarized the last 8 to 9 month's of effort for the study. Preliminary data showed 2010B forecasts which is the numbers the cities sent to the Metro- politan Council as to what they belive will happen by 2010 as to employment, trips, etc. Figures for 2010C is the Council's forecast for what will occur in the corridor by 2010. He said the Metropolitan.Council now has to resolve some of the differences in these numbers. Basically, population forecasts are not far apart. In the employment forecasts there is some difference and when you get to the trip.forecast..for--:the estimated land use the numbers are significantly different. As to the impact of these numbers, Mr. Hoffman said that 40,000 vehicles per day equates to approximately one lane of traffic on the freeway. Using the cities' forecasts for 2010 with build -out as allowed by existing ordi- nances, four lanes each way would be needed on 1 -494 west of Highway 100 and five lanes would be needed east of Highway 100 to make it work.. He emphasized that these are preliminary figures at this point in time. The issue now for the study is the feasibility of improving 1-494 to accommodate the forecast numbers. Following discussion, Member Turner reiterated that land.use is the key to these issues. . APPOINTMENTS MADE TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS. Following the Council inter- views with applicants for advisory boards and commissions held on February 23, 1987, appointments were made as follows. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for appointment of Lee Johnson to the Community Development and Planning Commission for a three year term to 2 -1 -90. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith for appointment of Robert Christianson to the Edina Park Board for a three year term to 2 -1 -90. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Kelly for appointment of Sally Tang to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee for a two year term to 2 -1 -89. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. As recommended by Mayor Courtney, Member Turner's motion was seconded by Member Kelly.for re- appointment of individuals to the .various advisory boards and commissions as follows: Community Development and Planning Commission_ (term to 2- 1 -90): Del M. Johnson, Jane Paulus and Virginia Shaw; Edina .Park Board (term to 2- 1 -90): Andrew E. Montgomery, Jean Rydell and Donald E. Wineberg; Board of Appeals & Adjustments (term to 2- 1 -90): Rosemary Utne; Building Construction Appeals Board (term to 2- 1 -90): Arthur H. Dickey and Rudy Trones; Human Relations Commission (term to 2- 1 -90): Doris Barman, Otto Byhre, Thomas Oye and Geoffrey Workinger; Edina Recycling Commission (term to 2- 1 -89): Virginia Bodine, Nancy Grimsby and C. Levering Wood; Edina Heritage Preservation Board (term to 2- 1 -89): John J. Metil, David Gepner, Thomas Martinson and Lois Wilder;. Community Health Services Advisory Committee (term to 2- 1 -89): Dr. Sharon Aadalen, Holly Branch, Virginia McCollister, Effie McKerson and Dr. Walter Wilder; Edina Art Center Committee (term to 2- 1 -90): Elizabeth Eisenbrey, Peter R. Spokes, Lee Heikens and Judy Smith; South Hennepin Human Services Council (term to 2 -1 -89) Leslie A. Olsen and Leslie Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. It was noted that there has been a resignation from the Edina Recycling Commission. Applications will be received through March 9 and interviews will be scheduled for March 16 with appointment in the Council meeting following. COUNCIL LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS. CONFIRMED. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for approval of the following Council liaison assignments with advisory boards.and commissions: Member Kelly - Community Health Services Advisory Committee and Edina Art Center; Member Richards - Edina Park Board, Building Construction Appeals Board and Human Relations Commission; Member Smith - Edina Recycling Commission, Edina, Heritage Preservation Board and Board of Appeals and Adjustments; Member Turner - Community Development and Planning Commission and South Hennepin Human Services Council. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney 3/2/87 TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that Alison Fuhr was first appointed to the Traffic Safety Committee as a representa- tive of the Citizens' Safety Council. Subsequently Lois Coon was named by the Council as a citizen -at -large representative. Meanwhile, Mrs. Fuhr was appointed to the Regional Transit Board (RTB) and up to last fall there had been no conflict. However, TRB activities have increased to a point where she now finds attendance at the Citizen's Safety Council difficult. This has been discussed with Lois Coon and she is willing to have their respective roles reversed and that action is recommended to the Council. Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner that Alison Fuhr be appointed as citizen -at -large representative to the Traffic Safety Committee and that Lois Coon be appointed as the representative of the Citizens' Safety Council. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *FEASIBILITY REPORT APPROVED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS; HEARING DATE SET. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -37 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -278 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a.preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, :said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time; place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for. two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -47 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING & CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -278 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, March 16, 1987 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: STT)RWAT.K Improvement No. P -S -37 $ 53,673.98 Vernon Avenue from Villa Way to Interlachen Blvd. PERMANENT STREET SURFACING /CURB AND GUTTER Improvement No. P -BA -278 170,047.24 Link Road from Eden Avenue to Vernon Avenue TRAFFIC SIGNAL Improvement No. 87 -5 65,000.00 Link Road and Vernon Avenue The project is proposed to be funded by HRA funds. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING FAU FUNDING FOR FRANCE AVENUE PROJECT. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION SUPPORTING APPROVAL OF THE HENNEPIN COUNTY FEDERAL AID URBAN (F.A.U) PROJECT SUBMITTAL FOR A PROJECT WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA FOR 1989 THROUGH 1991 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and, WHEREAS, the City Council encourages and participates with improvements to obtain adequate transportation facilities in the metropolitan area; and, WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Department of Transportation application for F.A.U. funding during the time period shown above includes the following project within the City of Edina; and, 3/2/87 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that this project is warranted and desirable for improvement through the Federal Aid Urban Program.. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA IN REGULAR MEJET-ING ASSEMBLED that the Transportation Advisory Board, the Metropolitan'Council, and other boards and commissions associated there - with are hereby advised that the City of Edina concurs with and supports the Hennepin County F.A.U. project application for the following project within the City of Edina for time period 1989 through 1991: County Project 8110; CASH 17 (France Avenue) "Capacity Project" from W. 70th St. to W. 77th St. including grading, surfacing and traffic control signals. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby directed to forward a.certified• copy of this resolution to Dennis L. Hansen, Chief, Transpor- tation Planning Division, Hennepin County Department of Transportation, 320 Washington Avenue South, Hopkins, Minnesota 55343. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. EDINAMITE '87 CO- CHAIRMEN COMMENDED. Member Smith moved that, on behalf of the Council, the Mayor issue a letter of commendation to Virginia Bodine and Kenneth Rosland for their efforts in co- chairing EDINAMITE '87. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. DEER IN BRAEMAR PARK DISCUSSED. Member Kelly recalled that a resident had stated her concern about the deer population in Braemar Park and of damage to her property adjacent to Braemar. She said she would like a report on what is being done as she had a deer in her yard recently that did damage. Manager Rosland said.that Gordon Hughes has been working with the DNR on this matter and will update the Council at the next meeting. REPORT REQUESTED ON SPEED CONTROL PROGRAM. Member Kelly asked that a report be given the Council on the progress of the speed control program which the Police Department is conducting. Mr. Rosland that report would be provided. NUMBER OF CITY VEHICLES REQUESTED. Member Kelly asked that she be provided by March 15 with the number of vehicles which carry the City's emblem so that this number could be included in the Centennial budget for Centennial logos. JOINT rIEETING OF COUNCIL /SCHOOL BOARD DISCUSSED. Member Kelly requested that a joint meeting of the Council and the Edina School Board be arranged soon. She referred to the plans for expansion of the Braemar Sports Complex and that it probably will require some public effort if it is to come forth. Last month's report of the School Board announced that their long range planning forecast E. referendum a couple of years from now. This could mean that the two public bodies could perhaps be burdening the citizens at the same time with a tax increase. She said she felt it important-to sit down together and discuss that possibility and other issues that would be of mutual concern.. STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT ON MARCH 21 DISCUSSED. Member Kelly asked that with regard to the Strategic Planning retreat scheduled for the Council on March 21 that she would like the Council to receive materials in advance of that date to prepare them for the discussions they will be holding. Member Turner explained that the Strategic Planning.Calendar.for 1987 which was given to the Council described the agenda for that meeting as: 1) Review of the 1986 work program, 2) Broad discussion of issues in relationship to the Mission Statement, . 3) Identification of key issues, and 4) Adoption of goals for 1988. She said that she and Gordon Hughes were asked to facilitate the meeting and would be appreciative of input from the Council Members. Mr. Rosland said that the information would be sent to the Council promptly and the matter could be put on the agenda for March 16 for discussion as to finalizing the agenda for March 21. LEGISLATIVE ISSUES DISCUSSED. Member Turner reported that with regard to issues being considered by the legislature that the AMM Board had voted to take a position of opposing the proposed 6% sales tax on governmental purchases. She asked for the Council members input and also what impact a sales tax would have on the City. She suggested legislative issues be discussed at the next Council meeting since there had not been a special meeting with legislators. Mr. Rosland commented that the MLC is studying that issue and each city has filled out a questionnaire and the information is being correlating and will be discussed at the next meeting. He said he would bring that information back to the Council to see how the cities would be affected by the various proposed taxes. The Council could then take a position which would be conveyed to the legislators through the MLC lobbyists. 3/2/87 RESIGNATION FROM EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION. NOTED. Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to a letter from Jack Rice in which he tendered his resignation from the East Edina Housing Foundation because he has moved his principal residence from the City of Edina. He said the Council has the respon- sibility of appointing an individual to the foundation. He asked that the. Council give it some consideration, that the individual should be well founded in the background and history of Edina and should understand what Edinborough is about. He said he would be happy to suggest names of people who have been involved if the Council so desired. No action was taken. PRELIMINARY REPORT GIVEN ON EDINAMITE '87 PROCEEDS GIVEN. Mr. Rosland reported that preliminary figures indicated that the proceeds from EDINAMITE '87 will be approximately $10,000. This figures includes the bid of $2,150 for the Council hosted party which was offered in the silent auction. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 3/2/87: General Fund $81,381.01, Park Fund $85.47, Art Center $6,630.25, Capital Fund $2,660.12, Golf Course Fund $245.76, Recreation Center Fund $4,838.17, Utility Fund $229,377.48, Liquor Dispensary Fund $6,606.71, Construction Fund $2,800.15, Total $334,625.22. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:22 p.m. City Clerk II. Consent Agenda M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK -�M O SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF COUNCIL MINUTES - August 4, 1986 DATE: MARCH 13, 1987 At its meeting of August 4, 1986 the Council adopted -a resolution approving the revised Final Plat for Indian Hills 3rd Addition, which resolution listed the name of all individuals or corporations who collectively were platting the property. The plat was finally brought in for signatures of City officials this week. There have been some changes in the names of those listed who are platting the property. The resolution adopted on August 4,-1986 should be amended to reflect the plat as officially signed. The revised resolution follows (deletions are shown as strike - throughs and additions are underlined): "RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership and Norwest Bank Bloomington, a national banking association; Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general .partnership and Home Savings Association of Kansas City, F.A.; The Minnesota South District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit corporation and Cross View Lutheran Church, a Minnesota non - profit corporation; Folke R. Victorsen Co., a Minnesota dorporation and Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota General partnership; Kenneth A. Macke and Kathleen Macke, husband and wife, end- F }s- L7seeR9a- has- 6e�pen�;- e- W9eeas8- eepa�$ee; and FBS Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation; and Arley B. Bjella and Beverly H,;;Bjella, husband'and wife, and Metropolitan Federal Savings Bank of Moorhead, a Federal Savings Bank, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 4, 1986, be and is hereby granted final approval." RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION ", platted by Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership and Norwest Bank Bloomington, a national banking association; Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership and Home Savings Association of Kansas City, F.A.,; The Minnesota South District of the Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod, a Minnesota non - profit corporation and Cross View Lutheran Church, a Minnesota non - profit corporation; Folke R. Victorsen Co., a Minnesota corporation and Indian Hills Company, a Minnesota general partnership; Kenneth A. Macke and Kathleen Macke, husband and wife, and FBS Mortgage Corporation, a Nevada corporation; and Arley B. Bjella and Beverly H. Bjella, husgand and wife, and Metropolitan Federal Savings Bank of Moorhead, a Federal Savings Bank, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of August 4, 1986, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. ADOPTED this 4th day of August, 1986. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City. Council at its Regular Meeting of August 4, 1986, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 10th day of March, 1987. City Clerk a III. A. MEMORANDUM TO: KEN ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: FRANCIS J. HOFFMAN, CITY ENGINE SUBJECT: 50TH STREET The attached items will be discussed in detail on Monday, March 16, 1987. FJH: lmb 3/13/87 • W. 50TH STREET COMMON ELEMENTS OF PLAN A, B,'& C. Side street traffic blocked from access to 50th. Trees north side removed. NSP to remove overhead wires. Sidewalk north side to be moved north 2'. Rebuild all retaining walls north and south side to Lannon Stone. Street to be built in same location. 6 day - 12 hr. - work week. No truck or bus traffic. Differences Plan "A" Street closure completely for 6 weeks. Lowest cost construction. Early start. Detour to 54th St. during entire construction. Plan "B" Street closure completely 12 -2 weeks, then two way traffic. 11 week completion -- longest. Costliest to construct - Additional - $53,750.00. Create hardship on north abuting property owners. Detour to 54th St. for 2 week period. LATE START because of wait for NSP pole removal. Plan "C" Allow continuous E. B. traffic flow although restrictive, minimal additional cost $29,350.00 No detour for E. B. traffic to business district. 10 week completion. (subject to flagging for certain operations). III.A. ONA From the Desk of: .1 M BELLIGAN JIM d JANET AVE. ESO. EDIN BRUCE 542 S0. EDINA, MN 55424 c� 4t�No-- OVA,, c � -- �T� xw-'c-- I we c w s gents, dd-�: 4 940 1 est tr 4 apo is, innesota 55435 • (612) 835 -2131 PP PP P° m From the Desk of: JIM b JANET BELLIGAN 4616 BR CE AVE. SD. EDINA, M% 51424 III.A. JIM BELLIGAN / 3 /(a �77 i Old Northwest Agents, 4901 West 77th Street, Suite 154, Minneapolis, Minnesota = .I i' V � 2 f i43 • (612) 5 -213 50th & FRANCE BUSINESS It PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424 March 12, 1987 III.A. To: Ken Rosland; Fran Hoffman; Mayor Courtney; & Board members, Leslie Turner, Peggy Kelly, Glen Smith, and Fred Ridhards. From: 50th & France Business & Professional Association Re: Proposed 50th St. closing the summer of 1987 We would like for you to be aware of our position regarding the proposed 1987 50th St. closing. At our 3/4/87 membership meeting; our members were in agreement that if the street is to be done during the summer of 1987; we unanimously support it being done with 2 lanes being left open during the construction. If this is not feasible; we favor postponement of 2 years. Thank you for your consideration. III. B. C. D. CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING IMPROVEMENT NO. P - BA -278 PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LINK ROAD BETWEEN EDEN AVENUE & VERNON AVENUE IMPROVEMENT NO. P - S - 37 SIDEWALK VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN VILLA WAY AND INTERLACHEN BLVD. (NORTHSIDE) VERNON AVENUE BETWEEN LINK ROAD AND JERRY`S WEST DRIVEWAY (SOUTH SIDE) IMPROVEMENT NO. 87 -5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LINK ROAD AND VERNON AVENUE The Edina City Council will on :Monday, March 16, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, hold a Public Hearing on the necessity and feasibility of constructing permanent street surfacing, sidewalk and traffic signals on the above listed streets. This hearing has been called as a result of redevelopment in the Grandview area. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be affected. The proposed improvements are a result of.redevelopments in the Grandview area and traffic concerns expressed by residents over the years. A Grandview area traffic study was conducted in 1984 to determine what traffic improvements should be made to the area. One issue area identified was the difficulties at Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. This proposal would close the intersection of Eden at Vernon. Additionally, new developments occurring on the north and west side of Vernon Avenue suggest the need for better pedestrian access to the Grandview area. These situations result in the proposed projects listed above. Improvements Estimated Cost P -S -37 - Sidewalk $53,673.98 P -BA -278 - Permanent Street Surfacing & Curb & Gutter $170,047.24 No. 87 -5 - Traffic Signal $65,000.00 The funding for these proposed improvements would be HRA funds and County funds, if available. Construction of these improvements, if approved, could be accompish- ed in 1987 and 1988. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hear- ing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. you. Francis J. Ho fm .E. Director of Pub is Works and City Engineer FJH:lmb 3/6/87 I LOCATION MAP I V. A. 2. SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -87 -4 L O C A T 10 N North of West 78th Street and east of Marth Road REQUEST create one new buildable lot. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT S -87 -4 General Location: Preliminary Plat Approval for John Laurent and Associates North of West 78th Street and east of Marth Road Mr. Dommer informed the Commission the subject property is comprised of two, developed single family lots. Together the lets have a frontage of 268 feet on--Marth Road and a total area of 41,184 square feet. The proponent has submitted a subdivision request which would create one new buildable lot. The existing home on the southerly lot would be removed. The existing home on the northerly portion of the property would remain. Lot widths for the new lots would be ii2 feet, 84 feet and 82 feet. Lot areas would be 17,970 square eet, 12,964 square feet-and 10,250 square feet. All three lots would Ordinance requirements for single dwelling lots. Mr. Dommer pointed out the properties along Marth Road are undergoing a transition. Several large older properties have been replatted in recent years. The most recent, Braemar Hills 11th Addition, created the lots on the west side of Marth Road. The new lots opposite the subject property are 100 feet wide. The topography of these lots is significantly different than that of the subject property. The lots on the west side of the road drop off dramatically. The buildable area on the subject property is relatively level. Mr. Dommer concluded staff believes the proposal is a logical continuation of the redevelopment of the area. The proposed new lots will provide building sites compatible with others in the neighborhood. The extra width of the lots on the west side of Marth is needed to compensate for the extremely steep slopes on the -lots. Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to: . 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. I 3. Utility Connection Charges Mr. Laurent, proponent was present. Mr. Laurent told the Commission the existing home on the site will be removed or demolished. fir. Laurent said in his opinion this proposal is a continuation of the redevelopment of the area. Mr. Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 1987 S -87 -4 Preliminary Plat Approval for John Laurent and Associates General Location: North of jest 78th Street and east of Marth Road refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat The subject property is comprised of two, developed single family lots. Together the lots have a frontage of 268 feet on Marth Road and a total area of 41,184 square feet. The proponent has submitted a subdivision request which would create one new buildable lot. The existing home on the southerly lot would be removed. The existing home on the northerly portion of the property would remain. Lot widths for the new lots would be 102 feet, 84 feet and 82 feet. Lot areas would be 17,970 square feet, 12,964 square feet and 10,250 square feet. All three lots would Ordinance requirements for single dwelling lots. The properties along :earth Road are undergoing a transition. Several large older properties have been replatted in recent years. The most recent, Braemar Hills 11th Addition, created the lots on the west side of Marth Road. The new lots opposite the subject property are 100 feet wide. The topography of these lots is significantly different than that of the subject property. The'lots on the west side of the road drop off dramatically. The buildable area on the subject property is relatively level. Recommendation: Staff believes that the prop of the redevelopment of the area. provide building sites compatible neighborhood. The extra width of Marth is needed to compensate for the lots. osal is a logical continuation The proposed new lots will with others in the the lots on the west side of the extremely steep slopes on Staff recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Charges 1 1 L o lr � I 1 l LOT DIVISION. BOOK y, PAGE JOb NO. °-/7.4' - U i K.4.L1..6S1P Ell: JOAN LAURENT & ASSOCIATES 11785 SUNNYBROOK EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 NIAIt I F1 ROAD I ncreby rerhty 11101 Ines pion was prepared by me Of under my direct supervision ana that I am o duly kc'glstrrrd Land Surveyor under the laws of the Sfufe at Minnesota. Jrtlly`D. L`4ndyren, MIn11. keg. No. 14376 LEGAL- DESCR1 P11ONS 1111(11T1Y0 LEGAL ufi]CIIIPTIhN lul 1, YIuaY 1, YIMSOY ADO I7IUN, •auu, Jlue '. Ill- I.—j ylYt 1b.r•a f, eoJ 14• b Suulb 1111.6 (Y.l of lLY XuI IL :Itll. lain y( II.. wr:•1 :.4.0 fv•l of Ih• burls••.( I/4 of Ih• Ynu111r••I 1/4 of heal lu. tl, Turn•111P llb, it es 21 Meet .f Ih. ht11 I'r lurll••1 M,r141•n, All In the Clly of 941... tlehn•yln c —, Y, Mll,u•.0 I.. PYOPOSNO LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ra TL• N.rt11 142.1 h.l 0Ir IAY Suulh 1411.6 levl of Ih. Murlh 'Jlll.b het of the r.el 2z4.0 het ut IL. soul seer( 1/4 ut IL• soul hrs.t 1/4 u( bwllu. b, Tur.•hip Ilfi, N..,N. 'G1, Ctly of hJlr.a. Ila uu.yln "..Y. In is T4• South Ob.11 f..l of lh. Nur14 'Jtl1.4 (u.rl u( Zhu west :114.4 foal of lh. Euulh...l 1/4 of IL• Soul hr..l 1/9 of b.al lun b, turu•Irly 114, N.uY. 21, Clly of hdln., Ilan uel•,u L'uuul Y. Ml,rue.ul ., •uJ Ihel p.rl ut L.1 1, Yloch 1, rINSUN ADb111UN, lylue ninth of the South Y. oo , tv•t lhV •r.a f, ..y.. . rJl to tit. r.0rd P1.1, the.(, Clly f 11J Mlo,Y eot. rALICki,4:. 1. he South 112.011 f..t of L., I, tl1uaL 1, wlNbbll Aubl1'IUN, --a"" lu ll,. record V1.1 lh.r•uf, C,,, rt Edlue, 4•nn•Plo M 1111.1. u l Y. IN III 1 JO __.. 60 • Denotes Iron Found HEDLUND ENGINEERING 1AVIA7 SERVICES, INC. Cos 1-6-1161 11.11 Iu1Y11011 11rb1U11 ••Ilunlll woo 9•w- Ph... W.•.we 05.70 • �.Z, parcel A ... G Parcel • C • Parcel ~B . •l: � � is �� /..y„ tiara" \.. V;I:Y' .� au V / 1 •/ I NIAIt I F1 ROAD I ncreby rerhty 11101 Ines pion was prepared by me Of under my direct supervision ana that I am o duly kc'glstrrrd Land Surveyor under the laws of the Sfufe at Minnesota. Jrtlly`D. L`4ndyren, MIn11. keg. No. 14376 LEGAL- DESCR1 P11ONS 1111(11T1Y0 LEGAL ufi]CIIIPTIhN lul 1, YIuaY 1, YIMSOY ADO I7IUN, •auu, Jlue '. Ill- I.—j ylYt 1b.r•a f, eoJ 14• b Suulb 1111.6 (Y.l of lLY XuI IL :Itll. lain y( II.. wr:•1 :.4.0 fv•l of Ih• burls••.( I/4 of Ih• Ynu111r••I 1/4 of heal lu. tl, Turn•111P llb, it es 21 Meet .f Ih. ht11 I'r lurll••1 M,r141•n, All In the Clly of 941... tlehn•yln c —, Y, Mll,u•.0 I.. PYOPOSNO LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS ra TL• N.rt11 142.1 h.l 0Ir IAY Suulh 1411.6 levl of Ih. Murlh 'Jlll.b het of the r.el 2z4.0 het ut IL. soul seer( 1/4 ut IL• soul hrs.t 1/4 u( bwllu. b, Tur.•hip Ilfi, N..,N. 'G1, Ctly of hJlr.a. Ila uu.yln "..Y. In is T4• South Ob.11 f..l of lh. Nur14 'Jtl1.4 (u.rl u( Zhu west :114.4 foal of lh. Euulh...l 1/4 of IL• Soul hr..l 1/9 of b.al lun b, turu•Irly 114, N.uY. 21, Clly of hdln., Ilan uel•,u L'uuul Y. Ml,rue.ul ., •uJ Ihel p.rl ut L.1 1, Yloch 1, rINSUN ADb111UN, lylue ninth of the South Y. oo , tv•t lhV •r.a f, ..y.. . rJl to tit. r.0rd P1.1, the.(, Clly f 11J Mlo,Y eot. rALICki,4:. 1. he South 112.011 f..t of L., I, tl1uaL 1, wlNbbll Aubl1'IUN, --a"" lu ll,. record V1.1 lh.r•uf, C,,, rt Edlue, 4•nn•Plo M 1111.1. u l Y. IN III 1 JO __.. 60 • Denotes Iron Found HEDLUND ENGINEERING 1AVIA7 SERVICES, INC. Cos 1-6-1161 11.11 Iu1Y11011 11rb1U11 ••Ilunlll woo 9•w- Ph... W.•.we 05.70 • • LOCATION MAP I V. A. 3. p j _ l � t NUMBER 1 om no S -87 -5 s. i l NTERLACHE�N C L O C A T 10 N South of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road REQUEST create one new buildable lot EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®1 of grg S -87 -5 s. i l NTERLACHE�N C L O C A T 10 N South of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road REQUEST create one new buildable lot EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ®1 G lip 5 -87 -5 Generally Located: Preliminary Plat Approval for DCI Second Addition South of Waterman Avenue and east of Blake Road _.Mr. Dommer told the Commission the subject property measures approximately 122 feet by 580 feet and is 56,800 square feet in area. The property is a through lot with frontage on Interlachen Boulevard and on Blake Road. An existing dwelling is located on the southerly portion of the property relating to the Interlachen Boulevard frontage. �- The proponents have submitted a request for subdivision which would create one new buildable lot fronting on Waterman Avenue. The lot would be 122 feet wide, 233 feet deep and would contain 28,515 square feet. Existing single family dwellings are located to the west and north of the proposed lot, and to the east is Interlachen Country Club. - The subdivision ordinance requires that all of the property be included in the plat. The lot for the existing dwelling would become Lot 2 of the new plat. Utility easements along the property lines are not shown on the preliminary plat These easements are required. The plat must also dedicate the right of way for Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Dommer concluded the proposed lots are compatible with , and larger than existing lots in the neighborhood. The proposed lot width of 122 feet compares to an average width of 92 feet for existing lots fronting on this block of Waterman Avenue. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval with the following conditions and modifications. 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision dedication. 3. The inclusion of all of the property in the plat and easements for roadway and utility purposes. 4. Dedication of property south of Interlachen Boulevard as an Outlot. Mr. R. Chase, representative for D.C.I Construction, Incorporated was present. Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Chase the reason for splitting the lot as it is shown on the preliminary plat. Mr. Chase replied the lot was split on the sanitary sewer line. Mr. Del Johnson moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to staff conditions. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNI`hY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 23, 1987 S -87 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval for DCI Second Addition Generally Located: South of Waterman Avenue and east -of Blake Road Refer to: Attached Preliminary Plat The subject property measures approximately 122 feet by 580 feet and is 56,800 square -feet in area. The property is a through lot with frontage on Interlachen Boulevard and on Blake R =ad. An existing dwelling is located on the southerly portion of the property relating to the Interlachen Boulevard frontage. The proponents have submitted a request for subdivision which would create one new buildable lot fronting on Waterman Avenue. The lot would be 122 feet wide, 233 feet deep and would contain 28,515 square feet. Existing single family dwellings are located to the west and north of the proposed lot, and to the east is Interlachen Country Club. The subdivision ordinance requires that all of the property be included in the plat.. The lot for the existing dwelling would become Lot 2 of the new plat. Utility easements along the property lines are not shown on the preliminary plat These easements are required. The plat must also dedicate the right of way for Interlachen Boulevard. Recommendation The proposed lots are compatible with , and larger than existing lots in the neighborhood. The proposed lot width of 122 feet compares to an average width of 92 feet for existing lots fronting on this block of Waterman Avenue. Staff recommends preliminary plat approval with the following conditions and modifications. 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision dedication. 3. The inclusion of all of the property in the plat and easements for roadway and utility purposes. 4. Dedication of property south of Interlachen Boulevard as an Outlot. PRELIMINARY PLAt OF D.C.I. SECOND ADDIYION . i _ I tom 1 aA1 rMaRas 1.7— !` W1aa •aVQ ^!w.•v!• fa•a•raaw. a•!.. .. �. lwlw• a1.•I• Mrr w•t•rl Nl .. •••• aw• w ar !w•ww! prltw N W arna•rl Wrur N aoe.lr tl.• 4 —•rw paatMf 11.• ^I 111 d• � 111. .� Yli •••e•rw• r aw • =rr w •. th1'Mw •I . \flit � !•I •MO••a ••^••a •r- • N m r • Ne.:s a �Ll 1 t !rw r • wry '••D••Ia -. ar rlrl• • !�. Iw.. , rn— Wrurr • rr•- w `rwr••M••r N M O •A•w•u�d -1! _ ••awrw N• Wlr • +. I ••)r• M. 1•r• ) r•ww. awe. Mr••ul • Y ! tlw ar w a�(.ra•.•• :�• N - Wtl :r �•.r. aw• w•ar�••rww ti. lOI,IY! )O. �a F.t. . T u -�/• •rP.•• W r•ww Ywev.• aa• ••!1„ �- `- _ . sn.sr •w., tl- w ......• Ii ••..rw a •. re. Nv- • se.. w. ssa• _ � . ..r.. .. al +aa i�a. �..w ..r.�. �.. r a ._.r —.. - ,• - _�. . w rrwn.! wl.ara! •r.. .wwn ..a.• .r r r•..w + . - • W N '. rw r r •aw• - ' ' - � Mw Itr ar 1 r•r W. !• a•N�. N )Ia.•I !w• 'ar r 1 w • - _ ' . • • - Y Iw.w \ Ma Irw ! rl wlr N - I • _ -- •.# .. Mi �r .•• err• r..w•' \) ...ww n a.-w �.r. r. ul.w - ••. PINY rflwrw• war•.•. r fi taawws•r1Yra0 Vw•r. 1 hereby artily that this survey was prepared by ale or under any dlrad supw*lon and that 1 am a duty R/gstea! tend Surveyor under IM has d the State of Mlnnesott ' . ! S s WATERMAN AVENUE s 1 :•!•If IIw1 .1 Lat•171, 7p77lLll:•f •NMr........... Mell:a.w/•10f•!•1..•y .w t..... l.n. /l fwl rf0 ••1 {•w�. - . e...i•• —.. 173 - .. zz Ir •4 IT-As lo Jz OLINT 0 '1a•1 \Yea as a•. fa••w !!:• •ra air /71�.f0all]:].l !U. • O 1 - 331.5 a� — - -- 'Sw1h 1'nr d •wr a E. era ./ s•cf•w iC. T.If•, •.7�aa sNh l—, of •!•:l =s s:ea. R3 • mfr • O, FYI r LOCATION MAP I V. B. REZONING & SUBDIVISION nuMBER z -86 -1 S -87 -2 L 0 C A T10 N North of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court REQUEST 15 Unit Townhouse Development EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT �! f Subdivision No 5-07-( SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: Planning Commission Park Board Environmental Quality Commission FROM: Planning Department w' / SUBDIVISION NAME: 5k3c1W �1 OWN LAND SIZE: .16 - TcwAot'(.4e_ /jj LAND VALI& :�3 D Gi (By: Date The developer,,-of this subdivision has been required to T 11 A. grant an easement over part of the land ElB. dedicate % of the land NJC. donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land Required-.(no density or intensity may be used for the first 50 of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park and the addition beneficially expands the park. 2. If property is 6 acrt:s or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a 6 acre park. II3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. D 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or his- toric value. 6. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. El 2. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON FEBRUARY 25, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, Del Johnson. John Bailey, Virginia Shaw, Helen McClelland, David Runyan, John Palmer and Jane Paulus MEMBERS ABSENT: Philip Sked and William Lewis STAFF PRESENT: Philip S. Dommer, Associate Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. NEW BUSINESS: Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling Q \� & Unit District to Planned Residential 5 -87 -1 District PRD -2 and Final Plat Approval for Shadow Hill Townhouses Mr. Dommer reminded the Commission preliminary rezoning of the subject property was granted by the City Council on October 20, 1987, and preliminary plat approval was granted on January 26, 1987. Mr. Dommer explained the proponent has returned with overall development plans and is requesting a final rezoning and final plat approval. The plan continues to illustrate a 15 unit townhouse development contained in four separate buildings. All of the building provide the required setbacks. A couple of minor changes have occurred since preliminary approval. First family rooms are illustrated on the two end units. These rooms measure approximately 16 feet by 214 feet. The rooms provide the necessary setbacks. Second, the deck areas over the garages have been replaced by hip roofs. Except for the above noted changes, the unit plans are as in the approved preliminary plan. Mr. Dommer added several details of the landscape plan and schedule should be pointed out. First, the plan empathizes screening of the project from the highway through plantings on the south side of Vernon Court. Due to the proximity of these plantings to the street damage by snowplows could occur. The small distance between the street and the highway fence makes this unavoidable. Second, a small retaining wall is proposed south of Vernon Court in the extreme southwesterly corner of the site. This retaining wall must be moved at least five feet back from the curb line. The landscape schedule proposes that 11 existing hardwood trees count toward the requirement. These trees should be identified on the plan. Sixteen seedless ash trees are proposed at 2 inches in size. The Ordinance specifies a minimum size of 2 1/2 inches. Finally, the proposed retaining walls north of the units lack sufficient detail to determine their adequacy. Mr. Dommer concluded the proposed overall development plans are consistent with those given preliminary approval. The changes to the plan are minor and do not represent a change which significantly alter the approved concept. Staff concerns are with site development features outside the proposed buildings. These concerns are technical in nature and can be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staff recommends final rezoning and final plat approval subject to the following conditions 1. No permits shall be issued until evidence that the plat has been recorded and real estate taxes and special assessment payments are current are provided. 2. The following changes and modifications to the landscaping plan be approved by the Building Inspector and City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. A. Retaining wall in southeasterly corner of site be moved 5 feet back from curb line or be removed. B. Existing mature trees on site should be illustrated on the plan an tagged on site. C. All landscaping stock shall be at least at the minimum Ordinance size requirements. 3. A detail of the proposed retaining wall system be provided which illustrates the height of all walls, materials, and the frequency and type of proposed tie - backs. This plan should be prepared and signed by a registered architect or engineer. 3. Subdivision dedication. Commission Members briefly discussed the proposed plans and agreed that any technical concerns should be worked out at a staff level. Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend final rezoning and plat approval subject to staff conditions. Mr. Palmer seconded the motion. 11r. G. Johnson Abstained. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT,AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 1987 Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling & Unit District to Planned Residential S -87 -1 District PRD -2 and Final Plat Approval for Shadow Hill Townhouses General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and east of Vernon Court Refer to: Attached plans, minutes and previous staff reports Preliminary rezoning of the subject property was granted by the City Council on October 20, 1987, and preliminary plat approval was granted on January 26, 1987. The proponent has returned with overall development plans and is requesting a final rezoning and final plat approval. The plan continues to illustrate a 15 unit townhouse development contained in four separate buildings. All of the building provide the required setbacks. A couple of minor changes have occurred since preliminary approval. First family rooms are illustrated on the two end units. These rooms measure approximately 16 feet by 214 feet. The rooms provide the necessary setbacks. Second, the deck areas over the garages have been replaced by hip roofs. Except for the above noted changes, the unit plans are as in the approved preliminary plan. Several details of the landscape plan and schedule should be pointed out. First, the plan empathizes screening of-the project from the highway through plantings on the south side of Vernon Court. Due to the proximity of these plantings to the street damage by snowplows could occur. The small distance between the street and the highway fence makes this unavoidable. Second, a small retaining wall is proposed south of Vernon Court in the extreme southwesterly corner of the site. This retaining wall must be moved at least five feet back from the curb line. The landscape schedule proposes that 11 existing hardwood trees count toward the requirement. These trees should be identified on the plan. Sixteen seedless ash trees are proposed at 2 inches in size. The Ordinance specifies a minimum size of 2 1/2 inches. Finally, the proposed retaining walls north of the units lack sufficient detail to determine their adequacy. Recommendation The proposed overall development plans are consistent with those given preliminary approval. The changes to the plan are minor and do not represent a change which significantly alter the approved concept. Staff concerns are with site development features outside the proposed buildings. These concerns are technical in nature and can be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Staff recommends final rezoning and final plat approval subject to the following conditions 1. No permits shall be issued until evidence that the plat has been recorded and real estate taxes and special assessment payments are current are provided. 2. The following changes and modifications to the landscaping plan be approved by the Building Inspector and City Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. A. Retaining wall in southeasterly corner of site be moved 5 feet back from curb line or be removed. B. Existing mature trees on site should be illustrated on the plan an tagged on site. C. All landscaping stock shall be at least at the minimum Ordinance size requirements. 3. A detail of the proposed retaining wall system be provided which illustrates the height of all walls, materials, and the frequency and type of proposed tie - backs. This plan should be prepared and signed by a registered architect or engineer. 3. Subdivision dedication. L/ °d Ba "AU I -N - sceL� $ fl ICJ: f � b'tNdtO WON MdfJUAltfJt btAwGs §Ild*u dJtt h§§uAltd cd'old d thunum; INS. .titiu:�hs; Cd�Jd Silkvt:ib'tt`s; 6LdFIF1�lr§ e SHADOW HILL TOWNHOUSES C.R. DOC. NQ V( MMIN MUDS �ra.v I xea•x5y'w ,�— 1:'p, •I g� fie? Lim tltlrU1M N111 Wyl IfM to x[ IN nI NWWo15e•Unna ... - .•.- ... 1 9dn1 WdllIFfI ydlA bl da ftlleff `�I11P of xt l /AalNWll WSftlydab �l• i` .`I 4�j tty�xf yl kt UA 61 ' bs .� RA I dbl lklroa b r j-// - v e.— ---------- wvt% -ol -AN"P lu �Z Z- -7 .......... ...... =0 CL DARRELL INC. .... . . . . ITECIUM E a FLAMMIMQ got. 1111.0.1 ill i1f IMP DAVID C. DARRELL INC.[- UR 11AIII.M. LAX: ARCHITECT IS.-ISOM I 11.011:L ... Sol �as I �. g3 S.M. OA 1 1 1 1 � 40 0 . s. i r .I AL7E�.1.UIt FWi:LY Fae7I� ` w '•'�" DAVID C. DARREtt INC A 6 PLANNING ...+ G. �'�. :NITECTUR`.• t eM..Law1 LaluY1 J eVa IEN(p iELTIOy i1A�L %coyv F�ovR IU•y DAVID C. DARRELL INC. ARC N ITLCTYRE R PIANNINO -_ -- • o` n =• Y.Lw. -- YM4OM yvs 41. W.f'll. 1.., �, ,, ,,,. ,,....: ,irnu� •ow• - .wu.+a �ouA. .�.nwu s..n rl Re ular S_Au tember 8 86 were a urner, seconded by , approved Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion w Member Turner to adopt the consent s- Member Kelly and seconded by as presented. co Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, R' s, Turner, Courtney LO Motion carried. M ORDINANCE NO. 825- TED FIRST READING; R -1 TO PRD -2 ZONING FOR ROBERT HANSEN. Q Attorney Ericks ised that the findings of facts that the Council had asked staff to pre t the meeting of September 15, 1986 have been prepared and were Gsent out a developer last week. C�� by Mr. en's attorn fpceived b• wa taining rinent being heard, Member Turner introduced Ordinance 1p• for First Reading as .follows: , ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A16. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -2) THE CITY C_ OUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of the NE-1, of the NW4 of Section 6, Township 116, Range 21, described as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of said NE-4 of the NW4; thence South along the West line of said NE4 of the NW4 a distance of 709.1 feet more or less to a point which is distant 814.5 feet North of the SW corner of said NE4 of the NW4; thence Easterly on a deflection angle to the left of 87 degrees 40 minutes a distance of 676.3 feet; thence running North parallel with the West line of the NE-4 of the NW4 a distance of 674.9 feet more or less to the North line of said Section 6; thence West along said North line a distance of 678.6 feet more or less to the beginning, which lies Northeasterly of the Northerly line of the County Road. The West One Hundred Fifty (150) feet of that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE-14 of NW4) and the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NW4 of NE-14) of Section Six (6), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty -one (21) West, described as follows: Beginning on a point in the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4 of NW4) distant 814.5 feet North of the Southwest corner thereof; thence running East and a deflection angle to the right of 920.20' a distance of 676.3 feet; thence North parallel with the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4 of NW4) a distance of 366 feet to a point which is 283.9 feet South of the North line of said Section Six (6); the actual point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence running East on a deflection angle to the right of 920 20' a distance of 1317.5 feet more or less to the centerline of the Town Road, also known as Gleason Road as now laid out and travelled; thence North - easterly along said centerline a distance of 384.7 feet more or less to its intersection with the North line of said Section Six (6); thence West along said North line a distance of 1426.3 feet more or less to a point which is distant 678.6 feet East of the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE-4 of NW4); thence South parallel with the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NE4 of NW4) 182.9 feet to the point of beginning. Which lies Northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the East 1/4 corner of Section Six (6), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116), Range Twenty -one (21), thence North 000 09' 27 seconds East along the East line of said Section Six (6) a distance of 1807.59 feet; thence North 780 48' 33 seconds 268 West a distance of 1070.37 feet; thence North 810 13' 33 seconds West a distance of 1031.19 feet; thence North 120 36' 50 seconds East a distance of .490.0 feet; thence South 770 23' 10 seconds East a distance of 100.0 feet to0 the � actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 77 23 10 seconds West a distance of 180.30 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the left with a radius of 687.96 feet (delta angle 300 18' 23 seconds, tangent distance 186.31 feet) a distance of 363.89 feet; thence South 720 18' 27 seconds West along tangent to last described curve a distance of 145.43 feet; thence along a tangential curve to the right with a radius of 839.93 feet (delta angle 220 43', tangent distance 168.72 feet) a distance of 333.02 feet; thence North 840 10' 27 seconds West a distance of 600.0 feet and there terminating. Said last described course is not tangent to last described curve; subject to easements, covenants and restrictions of record, if any; it being the intention to convey the westerly 150 feet of said tract measured perpendicularly to the west line of said tract." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the Ordinance was seconded by Member Bredesen who commented that the findings of fact confirmed his position on the rezoning request. Member Richards reiterated his concern that he felt the subject property should not be developed to the maximum density and that the Council should bbd responsive to the concerns raised by the neighborhood. Member Kelly commented that she had been the other negative vote when the Council had last considered the rezoning request and that in consideration of the findings of fact, even though the developer has presented plans for maximum density, she felt the proposal cannot be denied. She added that her support was contingent upon all taxes being paid up before a building permit is issued. Member Bredesen said that with regard to this particular property there are a number of factors that would favor this level of density, its location and proximity to the crosstown highway, its proximity to other properties that were allowed to be developed at a similar density and the public open space behind the development. Member Turner said she based her support on the guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan in which the Council had looked carefully at the land use plan in determining the most appropriate use for each part of the City. Paul Carson, 6001 Pine Grove Road, suggested a change in the Zoning Ordinance that would put a limit on the number of units for the various zoning districts instead of the range of density the ordinance now provides. There being no further comment, Mayor Courtney called for a rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards First Reading granted. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR CARROLL ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for property generally located west of Gleason Road and north of Valley View Road. The subject property contains 41,355 square feet and is developed with a single family dwelling. Immediately to the north is St. Albans Episcopal Church; all other surrounding uses are single family dwellings. The owner of the property has submitted a request to subdivide the property in order to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would contain 19,346 square feet and the lot for the existing dwelling would contain 22,207 square feet. Both lots would exceed ordinance requirements for lot width, depth and area. The existing dwelling would maintain the required 10 foot setback from the new property line. Mr. Larsen pointed out that lots along this section of Valley View Road vary significantly in size and shape and range from approximately 13,000 square feet to over 40,000 square feet for this parcel and one other. Lots to the south and east are generally smaller and lots to the west are larger than those proposed here. The proposed lots front on Valley View and should be evaluated in light of conditions on Valley View HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1986 At M. EDINA CITY HALL MANAGER'S CONFERENCE MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Wil ' ewis, John Bailey, Del Johnson, G Johnson, John Palmer, John Skagerb ane Paulus, Helen McClelland and Virgi aw MEMBERS ABSENT: ked and David Runyan STAFF PRESENT: raig Larsen, City Planner Fran Hoffman, City Engineer Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APP, OF THE MINUTES: DeAdarPalmer moved for ap ment and ---A-ll were in favor. The motion II. OLD BUSINESS: (� Z -86 -1 Robert Hansen R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residence District. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that the subject proposal has been before the Commission several times. The most recent proposal was heard and denied at the July 2, 1986 ;meeting. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent has submitted new plans for review. The plans continue to illustrate 15 townhouse units. Size and design of the units remains unchanged from previous submittals. However, unlike previous plans, the new plan conforms to the setback requirements of the _ PRD -2 District. A front setback of 30 feet and rear setback of 35 feet are provided. Mr. Larsen. concluded the revised plan provides the minimum setbacks required. The plan now conforms to all requirements of the PRD -2 Zone and staff recommends preliminary rezoning conditioned on: 1. Acceptable overall development plans. 2. Final platting. 3. Subdivision dedication. The proponent, Mr. Hansen and architect Mr. Daryl were present. Mr. Palmer moved for rezoning approval. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. Mr. Gordon Johnson abstained. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 2, 1986 Z -86 -1 Robert Hanson, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and east and north of Vernon Court Refer to: Attached preliminary plans. The subject property measures approximately 220 feet by `680 feet and is 138,900 square feet in area. This vacant parcel is zoned R -1, but is shown on the Comprehensive Plan as suitable for low density attached residential at up to 6 units per acre. Directly south of the property is the Crosstown Highway. City owned open space (Krahl Hill) borders most of the northerly property line. North of the westerly portion of the site there is one single family home and two, 5 unit townhouse projects. Directly to-the east is a 36,000 square foot parcel owned by the Masonic Temple. Further east are the doubles along Gleason Court. The proponent is requesting a rezoning of the property to PRD -3 to allow for the development of 16 townhouse units evenly divided among four buildings. All units are proposed as 2 story structures, with basement and an attached 2 car garage. Half the units would provide approximately 2,600 square feet of living area and half would contain nearly 3,000 square feet of finished space not including basement. Exterior materials would be primarily brick with some wood accents. The PRD -3 zone requires a front street setback of 35 feet, an interior side yard setback of 20 feet and a rear yard setback of 35 feet. All four buildings fail to provide the required front street setback. The proposed front street setbacks vary from 6 feet at the cul de sac to 25 feet for portions of the most westerly building. the 30 foot setback illustrated on the plans is measured from the street and not the property line as required. The typical setback provided is 15 feet. The most westerly building provides a 25 foot rear yard where 35 feet is required. Recommendation: Staff supports the townhouse concept and the density proposed for this site. It is compatible with other nearby developments. The development proposal is also consistent with policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, especially its attempt to avoid the steep slopes on the site. However, we believe the proposed front street setback variance is too great. As proposed it would not be possible to park on the driveway without violating the City's Nuisance Ordinance which requires that parking be at least 15 feet from the curb. A front street setback of 25 feet would be more reasonable. This could be accomplished without significant alteration of the hill, but would not allow rear yards for the 2 easterly buildings. Staff recommends continuing this item to allow the proponent to rework the site plan within the following parameters: 1. Front street setback of 25 feet. 2. A setback of 20 feet from the cul de sac. 3. A 35 foot rear yard setback from the northerly property line. 4. Hennepin County approval of any landscaping on the right -of -way. The preliminary plan proposed a heavy landscape buffer south of Vernon Court. In the past the county has not allowed landscaping on its right -of -way. sz c.' ► rwa � .. - a e r.ru.. a o n.0 - � ►n�aaa au..•a� r CJ .NO..sv.Ir cu.. - a• N. WY w uN..i � wuar..w r.Na I:a• � a.arT ... _._ a .Yard ...a. � rr�v...s.>o •a...a ..a r 3 e 1" <� �; � � •, , alt: t tt tit Z ZZ Y CSR N c N .� \` � I- _ i1��- _ •`\ ` \\ \' �__ ,,. - -- — 1M OAVID C. DARREII INC. f NI..eN K A V►YaN the =ITECTIIRC 1 PIANFiYC uw er ..n ...n a• —� �'� -_ NYy01'I. MI! 4YFl.:■ laY! -._ _... .i. a.. Y0.�t4� Nu,IM. f.rwl 1!.! /FOY! .•e.!l.lue a UNIT 7F - - "SOU T- Ji— EL!•VATIQ "/•1 r 5 1 v t _ 1 ` 1L LNtT -SID T -rr cz—� �..� _ _ 5r_R..rwr —�_ 1 _A_.`__._ . c' A v -► r 1 e .c .o J. •� X�jl,S s i ._ .. j iT,,s r"�f�l " +t rFt .p.'�,'. •j hr� ,i . ..� .- 4• ., ' .- aw1Y wsrr srl�f DAVID C. DARREIt INC. lftp•v1 LL a Iv«oi .vi ARCNIfECTURN A ►IANMIMO ' _ fGlr ..... M.ww ��OtN MII IYIIN• 111 ; V y 1W1wY qw./t T1lIfw011 �IfIII IW � 1 I UNIT 7F - - "SOU T- Ji— EL!•VATIQ "/•1 r 5 1 v t _ 1 ` 1L LNtT -SID T -rr cz—� �..� _ _ 5r_R..rwr —�_ 1 _A_.`__._ . c' A v -► r 1 e .c .o J. •� X�jl,S s i ._ .. j iT,,s r"�f�l " +t rFt .p.'�,'. •j hr� ,i . ..� .- 4• ., ' .- aw1Y wsrr srl�f DAVID C. DARREIt INC. lftp•v1 LL a Iv«oi .vi ARCNIfECTURN A ►IANMIMO ' _ fGlr ..... M.ww ��OtN MII IYIIN• 111 ; V y 1W1wY qw./t T1lIfw011 �IfIII IW / ~N ^ ` ` I or_z��z�n�� ^ - DAVID C. CARRELL INC. 11 0 �'1 . sr: .a,..v. nmi Rw �r'1•r' n►ceMeYT ��mlr RAI.c 1.16 DAVID C. DARREII INC. an w" PANNING w Y....• w.n -- Y�w�M R % I.MaI 7 41! . YYl1111 UN! — -- N lOIY4 LYIIY !4l! .f.h YY.fwl .'pY�., Yft I!llAOY! EIlYlf N4 i Mp , ■ SOUTHDALE SHOPPING CENTER ■ a �e des :s i• A 2R TA/1 E N P -87 -2 Request: Zoning: Final Development Plan Midwest Federal 3100 West 66th Street Midwest Federal Building Expansion Planned Office District Mr. Dommer informed the Commission the subject property is a triangular parcel forming an island at the intersections of Xerxes Avenue, York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently developed with a 4810 square foot circular structure and 2 drive up teller kiosks. The proponents request approval of a plan to add approximately 2210 square feet to the building by extending the circular pattern 8 feet and enlarging the underground vault. Two additional drive -up teller kiosks will also be added. The proposed plan provides several site improvements by eliminating several non - conforming setbacks and providing additional landscaping. Surplus parking in excess of ordinance requirements by 8 parking stalls is also incorporated into the plan. Mr. Dommer pointed out in general the proposed site conforms to ordinance requirements, however, the proponents request consideration for permitting three non - conforming features to remain. One, the parking stalls adjacent to the flagpole do not provide the required 10 foot setback from the building. Two, an existing parking stall at the entrance from Xerxes Avenue is setback less than the required 20 feet from the right of way. Three, the service kiosks at the drive up teller are at a width of 8.5 feet instead of the required 9 feet. The proponents have agreed to reduce the exit width from the drive -up teller area to 20 feet as required. The plan currently shows a 32 foot width which may encourage entry at that point. The proposed plan continues the design of the existing materials using colored steel panels and clear glass. Mr. Dommer added despite the unusual shape of the site, the proposed plan provides several site improvements and permits a reasonable expansion and additional parking on -site. Staff supports the request for the non - conforming setbacks to parking, however, prefers that the drive -up teller width be increased to 9 feet as the ordinance requires. Other new drive -up teller facilities in the City have met this requirement. Mr. Dommer concluded staff recommends Final Development Plan approval conditioned on Hennepin County approval regarding access design, the reduction of -the drive -up teller exit to 20 feet maximum as previously stated, and drive up teller widths of 9 feet. Mr. Egge, representing the proponent Midwest Federal was present. Mr. G. Johnson questioned Fran Hoffman, City Engineer, as to whether the island on 66th Street was to be extended east past Xerxes preventing access from Xerxes to eastbound 66th Street. Mr. Hoffman responded that it was his understanding that the County planned to do that, Mr. Hoffman suggested that the bank review this with Hennepin County and assess its impact on their traffic circulation. A brief discussion ensued between Commission Members and Mr. Egge regarding the request by Midwest Federal to construct the drive -up teller widths at 8.6 feet instead of the required 9 feet which is stipulated by the Edina Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Runyan suggested staff study the reason(s) for the stipulation of 9 feet between drive -up aisles. He pointed out the ordinance may not have addressed the fact that cars are now scaled smaller. The 8.6 feet requested by the proponent may be adequate for the times. Mr. Egge said Midwest Federal would prefer the 8.6 foot_ width but has no problem with the Ordinance requirement of 9 feet. Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend approval subject to staff conditions and the condition that the drive -up teller widths remain at 9 feet. Mr. Runyan seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 1987 P -87 -2 Final Development Plan Midwest Federal 3100 West 66th Street Request: Midwest Federal Building Expansion Zoning: Planned Office District Refer to: Attached Plans The subject property is a triangular parcel forming an island at the intersections of Xerxes Avenue, York Avenue and West 66th Street. The site is currently developed with a 4810 square foot circular structure and 2 drive up teller kiosks. The proponents request approval of a plan to add approximately 2210 square feet to the building by extending the circular pattern 8 feet and enlarging the underground vault. Two additional drive -up teller kiosks will also be added. The proposed plL -i provides several site improvements by eliminating several non - conforming setbacks and providing additional landscaping. Surplus parking in excess of ordinance requirements by 8 parking stalls is also incorporated into the plan. In general the proposed site conforms to ordinance requirements, however, the proponents request consideration for permitting three non - conforming features to remain. One, the - parking stalls adjacent to the flagpole do not provide the required 10 foot setback from the building. Two, an existing parking stall at the entrance from Xerxes Avenue is setback less than the required 20 feet from the right of way. Three, the service kiosks at the drive up teller are at a width of 8.5 feet instead of the required 9 feet. The proponents have agreed to reduce the exit width from the drive -up teller area to 20 feet as required. The plan currently shows a 32 foot width which may encourage entry at that point. The proposed plan continues the design of the existing materials using colored steel panels and clear glass. Recommendation Despite the unusual shape of the site, the proposed plan provides several site improvements and permits a reasonable expansion and additional parking on -site. Staff supports the request for the non - conforming setbacks to parking, however, prefers that the drive -up teller width be . increased to 9 feet as the ordinance requires. Other new drive -up teller facilities in the City have met this requirement. Staff recommends Final Development Plan approval conditioned on Hennepin County approval regarding access design, the reduction of the drive -up teller exit to 20 feet maximum as previously stated, and drive up teller widths of 9 feet. ♦� i Sri DJ1N `aj is ►3( • " ✓1 . - . is .:. >EVKRA- %-"MS SIGN _[LEND [� r ALL ■.S- SIT6 ""-.0 {OMEN ?I -♦ SJller !T G{ aA/ ZA A 7..Lm.-E S -=75 KflY 7NVfl �n�kSIOS'IM QJAI.:TV D /lO'fGIMl 7 "'1104)AMD SR RAMS MM:Wf A DAIVi -1N Ti WlIL• =4 1 B'. %P;DYEE MAKING' - -�L -_ _ •f13T ;pYTOUR slL ADLf �OIA &~ A � G 'DD MOT 5%,rr • Q, D '04AMD.4AI VAA—fi ONLY ) [S LT 'pN1L MA-C1►K L 5{ W /17LpSED 'DrAL. AVIAMG . 41 t!�, 4 JS WOV cc .co 2 W i ► `aj is ►3( �IZia [� r =4 W :i i 1- M*.1--------- - - LANDSCAPE PLAN P- ANTING /AAT!R.AL •LN lDJLi • i�n4E N�TA K!Y ="MON NAMG •1!! MRnOO QUMTITY MJLf A NOIMAY MAP-& KLIL MTANOID.t oft- •b q M7. U-. • P.M DAR QI[11Q/f PAWSTRls tit• 50 q ND UII L GRYJN[ :.00N3T GLNP"IA - M.AcAulwa '.[YL+M!' sMt• •• $ ND WiP D MINT .1"p .kwlpsft 4VMIP7IIN3 "IN•N•IL 'MMT µA{P• �• -LV• wT •S 6TOI! [ i1M4P ptMGfD •'VITA" a- ALMTA ETA Y'b• M 1!D jrvey for —F '.IID'wvEST FE,—.,<AL SAVINGS a LOAN ASSOCIATION f (DIVA• MINNESOTA SITE 'Z— 7 40. 10 Z A vii Coll W x W X W 66TH ST (GO. RD. NO. 53) \�I I. R. •.•.... ..... � IBA&W- �2-PiAbt C, E. COULTER IS ASSOCIATES. INC. Ise.IC1 o MAU 2001 MAM ",tc ern ��1 1 � • - �= IlE I�trtlFr 1�. �p Irw (�1 ISM 11 ^-' �/ 1 •�rru .. .1'i•. �I .1�... 1'11 ��a r'— .ILV+ -���� BRANCHI OFFICE AN �I� J • I . rMNA a� �i!j q f�� ^IORTw'OLD PALAU 1001 OL90" UCMfEC76 nr.wm-n.ruu t/rn - uvr w. /nr SI,OICi r..3�,..]SYG Fiji r fl 1 r FEDERAL 8AVING9 AND LOAN I 1 ORANCH BRANCH OFFICE , EDIN1. MIMIE60TA �' ' I• il.li.l��!Il,�i� ! ',III,::; �'1 WEST, v1sumiq ICI EA" LLL*Ci&. i-= = —. 4-.-C- r---4r�'- ZO, 00-01 0001, iz C-C cow, � L A=LL L LL w -go ;6*x u Ou 3z � lwq Im I Ell V ,D (z'D A Is IV. D. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Year XIII Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Budget DATE: March 11, 1987 A public hearing to consider a proposed budget for year XIII of the CDBG Program has been scheduled for March 16, 1987. Notice of this hearing was published in the Edina Sun - Current on March 4, 1987. Edina's allocation for year XIII of the program is $140,679. Staff has prepared the following budget for City Council consideration. Except for the Comprehensive Plan project this budget reflects projects which have been-funded for some years. Staff is suggesting that $10,000 be allocated to staff time and materials to update the graphic elements of the Comprehensive Plan. The graphics of the Plan need to be updated to conform to the text changes adopted in 1986. All other projects represent continuing programs. The Rehabilitation of Private Property project would provide funding to repair and rehabilitate single family homes in the City. The Architecture Barriers project would provide funding to implement our plan to make all public buildings and facilities accessible to the handicapped. The assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing project would be available to assistance in construction of new housing in City. At this time there are no pending proposals for new housing. However, it is important to keep the project active in case a project is proposed during the budget period. The Public Services project would continue our funding of the H.O.M.E. program of South Hennepin Human Services Council. It would also provide funds for the delivery of surplus food to distribution locations in the City. Activity Budget Rehabilitation of Private Properties 40,000 Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000 Public Services 20,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000 Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 30,679 TOTAL 140,679 i Since the preliminary budget was prepared we have received two specific requests for funding. First, the H.O.M.E. program has requested a year XIII funding level of $13,000.00. For the past several years we have provided $8,000 per year for this project. Attached to this memorandum is the request from H.O.M.E. and also a summary of their activities. This increased funding level was discussed during last year's budget hearings. We have also received a request from Hennepin Economic Resource Organization (HERO) for $7,033 from our year XIII allocation. A letter from the chairman of HERO explaining the request and the HERO business plan are attached for Council review. According to the business plan HERO will provide job training and job retraining to disadvantaged and dislocated residents of suburban Hennepin County. All communities in the Urban Hennepin County CDBG program have been asked to contribute 5% of their year XIII allocation to HERO. The money would be used to purchase a building for the project. Our funding would be secured by a lien against the facility. A member of the Board of Directors of HERO will be present at the hearing to further explain the request. If the Council decides to fund the HERO project staff would suggest the following budget. A resolution by the Council will be necessary to send the proposed budget to Hennepin County. Activity Budget Rehabilitation of Private Property 40,000 Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000 Public Services 20,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000 Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 23,646 HERO 7,033 TOTAL 140,679 Serving Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Richfield and Edina Ili, !x"911 I P111 L11 F111 Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly March 3, 1987 Mr. Craig Larson City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Craig: - I am writing to you in anticipation of the upcoming hearing on Year XIII CDBG allocations. H.O.M.E.'s success in providing in -home services to Edina's older residents is largely due to the CDBG program. H.O.M.i=. formally requests a $13,000-- allocation from Edina's Year XIII CDBG program. This amount is equal to the sum of last year's two allocations made by Edina to H.O.M.E. We will need this level of funding again to keep H.O.M.E. services,to Edina's low and moderate income elderly vital. Federal and county funding is tenuous. The Metropolitan Council funding will cease as of January 1, 1988. On the other hand, requests for service continue to increase. Elderly residents are finding in -home services an attractive alternative to long term care facilities.. Attached is H.O.M.E.'s 1986 record of service to elderly and disabled individuals in the 4 -city area. Totals for Edina show that we provided 135 households with a total of 3,281 hours of direct service. Through our small jobs program we provided a variety of ongoing minor maintenance repairs, including roof repair, caulking, toilet and faucet repair, carpentry and the seasonal tasks of lawn mowing and snow removal to 90 households. In addition nine homes received major maintenance assistance, primarily in the form of exterior painting. We also provided general housecleaning on a regular basis to 32 residences. Our active client list (homes served in the past 18 months) currently numbers over 180 households and 200 customers. Our efforts to reach Edina's low and moderate income households also increased in 1986. We are regularly attending the surplus commodities distribution site to ensure that the elderly who use that program are also aware of H.O.M.E. We find that individuals who use surplus commodities are often in need of additional community services. Our contact with the Energy Assistance Program has also intensified. As a result a majority of the low income elderly who use EAP also use the H.O.M.E. program to maintain their households. South Hennepin Human Services Council Creekside Center 9801 Penn Ave. So. Room 100 Bloomington, MN 55431 (612) 888 -5530 Mr. Craig Larson Page 2 March 3, 1987 We appreciate Edina's past support of H.O.M.E. We believe alternative care to seniors is an economical and socially sound concept. We will continue to do all we can to see that Edina's elderly are able to live in their homes for as long as they choose to do so. Sincerely, teem, \A, Don Hauge H.O.M.E. Maintenance Coordinator DH:sa Enclosures H.O.M.E. (Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly) 1986 Maintenance Homemaker Total BLOOMINGTON of Customers 225 103 327 # of Households 155 72 227 # of Jobs 906 1,341 2,247 # of Hours 2,869 3,176 6,045 EDINA _ - # of Customers 119 56 175 of Households - 90 45 135 T of Jobs 622 745 1,367 # of Hours 1,586.5 1,694 3,281 RICHFIELD # of Customers 139 36 172 # of Households 102 31 131 # of Jobs 665 436 11101 #.of Hours 1,880 1,045.25 2,925 EDEN PRAIRIE # of Customers 11 5 16 # of Households 8 3 11 # of Jobs 13 46 59 # of Hours 295.75 136 432 MPLS. # of Customers 1 2 3 # of Households 1 2 3 # of Jobs 1 23 24 # of Hours 3 65.25 68.25 TOTAL # of Customers 495 202 697 # of Households 356 153 355 # of Jobs 2,207 2,591 4,798 # of Hours 6,634.25 6,116.5 12,751 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR YEAR XIII COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRA11 WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of .a Joint Cooperation Agreement with Hennepin County, is a cooperating unit in.the Urban County Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of Urban Hennepin County CDBG funds made available to it; and WHEREAS, the following proposed use of Community Development Block Grant funds was developed consistent with program rules: Activity Budget Rehabilitation of Private Properties $ 40,000 Comprehensive Plan Graphics 10,000 Public Services 20,000 Removal of Architectural Barriers 40,000 Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing 30,679 TOTAL $140,679 BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council approves the proposed use of Year XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant funds and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County for consideration by the Citizen Advisory Committee and for inclusion in the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Statement of Objectives and Projected Use of Funds. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of March 16, 1987, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of March, 1987. City Clerk IV.D. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: CDBG Assistance for Summit Point (formerly Woodhaven) DATE: March 13,_1987 The sponsors of Summit Point (29 unit senior citizen project at Vernon and Summit Avenues) have requested $11,208.34 in assistance to cover unbudgeted construction shortfalls. This funding would be used to purchase furnishings for the community room and office and for the construction of a traffic control island at Interlachen and Summit Avenue. Three reasons are given for the shortfall. First, during construction the Fire Department ordered changes which amounted to $8,100.00. Monies set aside for furnishings had to be used for this change order. Second, the City is requiring the traffic island to prevent left turns from Summit west bound on Interlachen Boulevard. The 3,750.00 cost of the island was not budgeted. Finally, installation of a monitoring system for the emergency pull cord system will cost $1,672.00. Money to fund this request is available in our year XII Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Housing Project. Funds would be provided to the east Edina Housing Foundation which would provide the assistance to Summit Point. This is necessary because of HUD regulations covering assistance to Housing construction. Tenants are in the process of moving into the building now. It's fully rented with a waiting list of 140 for this 29 unit project. Woodhaven Non - Profit 328 West Sixth Street Saint Paul, Minnesota March 12, 1987 Mr. Craig Larson East Edina Housing Foundation 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Housing Corporation 55102 Re: Financial Assistance for Woodhaven /Summit Point Apartments Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Larson: The Woodhaven Non - Profit Housing Corporation respectfully requests financial assistance in the amount of $11,208.34 to cover the cost of community room and office furnishings, landscaping, and emergency pull -cord monitoring at Woodhaven. Copies of the invoices and estimates are attached. The reason we are requesting this assistance is because Woodhaven had to pay $8,100.00 to cover the costs of additional fire equipment in the building. This $8,100.00 came from the Contingency that would otherwise have been used to purchase furniture and pay for the cost of the monitoring system for the emergency pull -cord system in the apartment building. Additionally the City has required us to do landscaping where Summit and Interlachen meet at the end of the driveway to improve traffic circulation. This cost was an unexpected addition to the construction at Woodhaven. I appreciate your willingness, and thank you in advance for this assistance. Please contact me at 291 -1750 with any questions you may have. Sincerely, "#�b7 Mary S. (Muffie Gabler Executive Vice President Woodhaven Non - Profit Housing /jlk Enclosure cc Ms. S. Dore Mead Mr. Ben Sweazey Ms. Pat Butler Mr. Bob Faloon Corporation pY; PYA /Monarch, I3tilc. FOODSERVICE DISTRIBUTORS January 23, 1987 wES'rMINSTL•'R CORPORATION 328 West 6th Street St. Paul, MN 55102 Attn: Pat Butler Thank you for the opportunity to quote on the above items. We sincerely Dope you will favor us with this valued order. l''i r \ /T`fONAItC}i , INC. LENNY b ROBIN MAZUREK (i/( Contract Sales /Design Department LRM:ch P. O. BOX 9452 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 • PHONE:(61 2) 542-1725 SPECIFICATIONS - (FURNISHINGS) I. Twenty (20) ea. 114550 Stack Chairs, light oak finish, fabric seat and back @ $98.50 ea., as follows: (10) ca. Upholstery 11473 (10) ea. Upholstery #477 $1,970.00 I'2. Eighteen (18) ea. 11TL4LA Stack Chairs, chronic finish, fabric seat y:td back 00450 (navy) @ $46.00 ea. 828.00 3. Five (5) ca. Oak Tables 42" square with 2" square outside leg mount; finish to match bannister oak - $204.00 ea. 1,020.00 4. Three (3) ea. 36" x 72" Folding Tables, light oak finish @ $59.00 ea. 177.00 Sub -Total $3,995.00 Freight Charge (estimate) 467.40 TOTAL - FURNISHINGS $4,452.40 RECAP: 'total of Furnishings $3,995.00 Total of Supply Items 697.94 Total Freight Charges (estimate) 513.40 GRAND TOTAL $5,206.34 TAX EXEMPT 0: 29729 Thank you for the opportunity to quote on the above items. We sincerely Dope you will favor us with this valued order. l''i r \ /T`fONAItC}i , INC. LENNY b ROBIN MAZUREK (i/( Contract Sales /Design Department LRM:ch P. O. BOX 9452 - MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55440 • PHONE:(61 2) 542-1725 NEW WE SELL FOR AND SHIP RENT SERVICE USED FROM LEASE PHONE ail FURNITURE STOCK BUY 6454534 2295 UNIVERSITY AVE., ST. PAUL, MN 55114 t�1L tll.�., ll,r,,ar�r ►►l "V�!! l!n _ 'iii�i il; Sold To .WESTMINSTER CORP 328 W. 6TH STREET -ST. PAUL, MN 55102 ATTN: PATRICIA BUTLER INVOICE N0. 76929 DATE 12/31/86 YOUR ORDER NO. Shipped To Our Order No. Salesman Tr.rms F.O.U. Date Shipoed Shq)petl /,,I DOUG NCT 30 days 12/31/86 I Our- truck__ Duanlily Order,rd Ouanlily Sh,pped — Stock Number /Deseriplion Unit P, ir,e — Ilrul — -__ :.nun nu 1 1 8773 VIRCO adj. table - blk /walnu-1, 89.0( 1 1 534CPP HON 4 -dr legal file - blk w /lock 139-0 2 2 502 CAPRI shack arm chairs - brn fleck 29 00 58.0 1 1 used 30 x 60 desk - blk 225.0 1 1 used blk exec. swivel 59.0 570.0 delivery 10.0 58 .0 CLAIMS TRUTH IrJ LENDING DISCLOSURE Claims !or defective merchandise must be made vrithin 10 days after receipt This invoice is clue on the 70th day following invoice dale as specified by pa of w.vrchand,sr. D:o rne,chandise may be returned for creclil unless by Written nlenl terms. If not paid in full by ilia 30th day the Purchaser expressly agre Authority from this C)Ifice. All returned merchandise must be shipped to us that a one.. percent (1 %) par month (Annual Percenu,ge natr, of 12%) la Prepaid. All claims for clarnaged merchandise delivered by commercial carrier charge shall be added to this account computed on the unpaid balance un must be filed :within the delivering carrier. Merchandise orrlerecf in error is the account is paid in full. Purchaser agrees to pay reasonable attorney's fe subject to 25% handling and restocking charge, and other costs incurred for collection. March 10, 1987 MAR 2 1 Westminster Corporation 328 West 6th Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 Attention: Muffie Re: Woodhaven Apartments Dear Muffie: Enclosed, please find my price for adding a concrete island at the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard and Summit Avenue, per the enclosed sketch. Three Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty ( $ 3,750.00) I have included the following: 1. New curb and gutter. 2. Saw cut and remove bituminous. 3. Raise existing manhole. 4. Patch blacktop at island. 5. $ 500.00 landscape allowance. 6. Installation of seven (7) street signs. 7. No permits will be required from the City of Edina or Hennepin County. If you have any questions, please, do not hesitate to call. Very sincerely yours, _LOVERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 00-'J o aj� Dave Anderson Project Engineer DA:dp cc: Pete Johnson - Trossen /Wright Architects Lovering Associates in General Contractors 1600 East 78th Street Minneapolis, MN 55423 (612) 869 -5545 I DRAINAGE 9 UTILITY EASEMENT PER (I PLAT OE INTERLACHEN POINT-TOWpIIiOMES —BAST LIPIE OF 61_IZK 4 - 19.3 Z I ` S / v ti • L WEST LINE OF SUMMIT AVENUE �— - .. GAS p � "I PFOt :.SED It +GhE55 8 - • -�_°D W ,� � EGHESS EASEMENT ��; Ak kq % - CENTERLIN Ok SUMMIT AVENUE TWZE LAND CAl$J14Ctc 't � L ^NTIM r)YirRIFY W /EXlsr, r NORTH 1 76. 16 6-- , M. N • I PKO V I o� AVEQL)A1f CLC -AKn: ' Fog fUTURI . CUKG S - - - ! r t FU TV R E Cowc. CUKo r y`� c n, �YWR PEAK )�J� �'� �F -� i ►1 N / C . (TEM poKAY- KEl�tO wF lE►.I CUtze IS o�;�;;:,: I '►) 9sS.5 /. K E A 11•J � t,i �� O w cil t�1•��T NONT► {EAtY_ v 1 • fix` t'ON OF LOT 32 / . - t- -. == p9� - -. . �`i�w Tom` =1`t�' • /'��`�- � u. cir,6 ' Ox • 111 4 b Estimate for Emergency Pull Cord Hook Up March 12, 1987' K & R Electronics for Wiring $ 240.00 Floyd Security - Monitoring Panel $1,432.00 TOTAL $1,672.00 HERD Hennepin Economic Resource Organization IV.D. 4150 Multifoods Tower • Minneapolis City Center a Minneapolis, MN 55402 • (612) 227 -0001 February 24, 1987 Edina Dear Mayor: In response to your community's scheduled March 161 1987 public hearing on Urban Hennepin County community development needs and proposed uses for your allocation of $140,679 from the Year XIII Urban Hennepin County grant, the Board of Directors of HERO - a non - profit small business accelerator facility - are asking for the inclusion of a request for $7,033, an amount representing 5 percent of your Year XIII allocation, in your local community development program. We have enclosed a copy of the HERO business plan and a list of the initial board of directors for your information. As described in the business plan, the requested CDBG fund will provide the resources necessary to purchase a facility to have a self - sustaining employment generating small business center to provide long -term employment to disadvantaged and dislocated who are. residents of suburban Hennepin County. It is the project's goal to serve as a model for the creation of job opportunities through focusing of employment opportunities, job training and education programs and employee -based support services at a single location. The investment of CDBG by yours and other communities within the Urban Hennepin County program will be secured by a lien against the facility, payable to the program should the HERO projects fail. Should you have any questions /concerns regarding HERO or this specific request, please feel free to contact me at 227 -0001. A member of the HERO board of directors will be attending the March 16, 1987 public hearing to make a brief presentation and address any questions you or your staff may have concerning the HERO request. Sincerely ours, f - Robert S. Arthur Chairman of-the Board cc: Community Development Staff A Non - Profit Corporation The corporation has been launched by four individuals, who have committed time and energy over the past f if teen months to developing this initiative, with the anticipation that they will add to their ranks as HERO goes forward. They are listed here in alphabetical order. ROBERT S. AR3MR, now with American Electronics Association, has worked as an executive for the Gallup Organization, The Psychological Corporation, Computech, Inc., and Control Data Corporation. Since 1958, the focus of his career has been on computerized information services. He has also been extensively involved in the creation of self- supporting non - profit corporations for societal goals. In energy conservation in 1980 he was the founding chairman of the board for the Natural Resource Corporation. He is chairman of the board for the Stillwater Data Processing Systems, Inc., organized in 1975 in the maximum security prison. He has served on the Hennepin Private Industy Council since 1979, both as member and twice as chairman, and also serves as chairman for the advisory committee of the Minnesota Supported Employment Project. He is chairman of the board for HERO. DANIEL C. FRUM has served on the Hennepin Private Industry Council as a member since 1984, and will again assume the chair in March, 1987. He has held positions in Human Resource & Manufacturing with the Toro Company, Whirlpool Corporation & Litton. Prior to creating his consulting and executive recruiting business, he was director of Human Resources at CTS - Fabri-Tek. His interest in creating work opportunities for the disadvantaged stems from his services as Metro director, as a loaned executive, with the National Alliance of Business. IIAIA : Her business career has included eight years as manager of the Brooklyn Center Chamber of Commerce. In October, 1986, she became communications director for Health Central, a health care management company. During her career with the Chamber of Commerce, she initiated and organized the development of a hundred and seventy six unit housing project. Initiated and lead a group of northern suburban municipalities in forming a Convention & Tourism Bureau, and assisted in the relocation of businesses to Brooklyn Center. She also has served as a member of Hennepin Private Industry Council, the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce Executive Board, Anoka- Ramsey Community College Board and initiated and served on the board of the Anoka County Mediation Project. JOYCE D ORBDCH: Self - employed consultant to individuals and small corporations in areas of personal employment issues. Lecturer and teacher on job skills & resume writing. Staff persona and facilitator for Eating Disorders Program at Methodist Hospital. Group leader for Red Cross Child Care Course. Former director & organizer of Golden Valley Youth Employment Services. Member of Hennepin Private Industry Council. Active community volunteer. W BUSINESS PLAN: HERO CPJUnMG JCBS FCR THE BCX�+I�IIC11i.LY DISADVAiID'AG® AND 7M BOQ " IICULY DISLOCATED 1 •1:: •!' •b: :�' •;' :E • ;oil wio- 1:10 1/15/87:FSA:05 :I;r�;.• 1' •� 11 i 1 11�.`1�'a' •• 11 MI WHMMS, the Hennepin County Private Industry Council recognizes the importance of promoting economic development opportunities which result in the creation of suitable jobs for economically disadvantaged persons; and WHEMM, the Hennepin County Private Industry Council has participated in the preliminary development of the Hennepin Economic Resources Organization (HERO) for the purpose of promoting a small business incubator /accelerator facility; WHEREAS, further development of EDP is dependent upon the creation of a capital budget and operating fund; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hennepin County Private Industry Council allocate $15,000.00 to a development fund, contingent upon acceptance of the HERO business plan, to be used to finance fund raising activities; and BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED, that the Planning and Evaluation subcommittee review the HERO Business Plan and make a recommendation relative to acceptance for ratification by the Council at the March 1987 meeting. Business Plan: Hero 1,/15/87: RSA: 05 -1- The need exists in a rapidly changing society to provide opportunities for those working who are "disadvantaged ", and those who have been "dislocated" by these changes. People within these two groups can be defined quite specifically. "The disadvantaged individual" is a person through a combination of factors such as: low educational attainment, lack of orientation to the work environment, insufficient vocational skills, and physical, mental or emotional disabilities, has difficulty in finding and keeping a job. "The dislocated worker" is an individual who after a period of productive service -loses his /her job due to lay -off. This dislocated worker experiences difficulty in finding new employment because of lack of suitable job opportunities, obsolete skills, age and lack of familiarity wl-%h job seeking techniques. Because the manufacturing section has been massively impacted by both off -shore resources as well as robotics, the extent of this economic and industrial transformation has produced the term "rust bucket state." While this term has not been applied to Minnesota, the impact is present and vividly proven in the situation of the taconite industry in northern Minnesota. The restructuring process is also represented in more recent industrial developments, such as computers and telecommunications. This industrial group has a significant role in the state of Minnesota, since the state ranks number six in number of electronics employees among the states. In the last year, the employee roster in electronics in the United States dropped by two percent or fifty thousand jobs. This has been represented in the Twin Cities, and in Hennepin County, by significant layoffs and restructuring on the part of Control Data Corporation, Honeywell and Unisys, as well as many small electronics corporations. There is now a sizable body of dislocated workers placed along side those who are "disadvantaged" and who have been struggling to qualify for an opportunity in the market place represented by Hennepin County. The constituency of the disadvantaged is calculated to be about twenty -five thousand persons in 1986; "the dislocated.workers" being about five thousand in 1986. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 -2- 7he very magnitude of the problem at the county level suggests that training and retraining be regarded as only one response to the problem. A second response is to create and sustain more job opportunities focused on labor intensive products and services, where neither robotics nor inexpensive overseas human resources can fulfill the need for specific products and services. The definition of the need, and an appropriate need response, is complicated by the polarization of opportunity seen in the work place. Professional opportunities requiring many years of education and special experience are growing in the private sector. Opportunities for minimal skills and earnings in various service functions are also growing. But for both "disadvantaged" and "dislocated" workers, the broad spectrum in the middle range is disappearing. This middle range of employment opportunities includes skilled manufacturing and labor trades, supervisory and middle management positions, para - professional and technical jobs. In most cases, there is no way they can hope to enter professional activities, and the alternatives at the other end of the stele provide marginal economic resources for survival. The need is for job opportunities in the middle range, for opportunities requiring human abilities and skills rather than extended specialized training, and for these opportunities to be developed more rapidly in the immediate future here and now in Hennepin County. Business Plan: Hero 1 /15 /87:RSA:05 MCC Since the fall of 1985, this concept has been examined in the context of a set of specific objectives. As a concept the idea of a Small Business Incubator /Accelerator is not a novelty; there is a large body of information about actual initatives: some successful and some not so successful. However, many of the iniatives have been focused on new start -up companies and oriented to "high technology" ner se. In many cases, the work opportunities created have been very remote from the two constituencies of critical need. High technology start -up companies have a critical need for highly educated, highly motivated, young professionals. Their need for the disadvantaged and the dislocated is very limited. Ili 'addition, there has been in many of these iniatives a heavy focus on the facility itself and its attendant professional and support services. In many cases, everything is provided from advice on the use of venture capital to word processing capabilities. All of this activity, however, may account for much less than fifteen percent of the budget expenses of the small business. Consequently, many of these incubator facilities have gotten into serious trouble, both those for - profit and those under no-profit auspices; at least this is true for the record in the Twin Cities. A soft market for commercial and industrial real estate has also impacted initiatives involving this budget item. By comparison, the cost of labor is, always, a large item in any corporate budget; thus the concept here is not focused on facility, per se, and management service, but rather upon access to subsidized human resources, and its training. Moreover by training is meant not only instruction specific and general but on- the -job work experience. HERO is focused on providing human resources important to the corporate goals. This is the first objective. The second objective is to provide preferential opportunity to corporations with labor intensive products and services, where numbers of persons are needed to create the product or service, and where growth and success of the business results in the demand for even larger numbers of like persons. Exanples in the product area are provided by such business enterprises as the processing of food items or the making of costume jewelry. In the service area, illustrations are afforded by telemarketing companies or messenger or courier services. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 -4- The third objective is to incubate and accelerate newly established businesses that are labor intensive. The emphasis is on growing more rapidly corporations with a track record and a performance achievement above average. HERO is not oriented to start -up in the first six to eighteen months of corporate existence, for corporations who have yet, so to speak, to win their spurs and establish market share. Thus, HERO is oriented to both for - profit and not - for - profit corporations in the first five years of their existence. The fourth objective is to provide a specific facility, an appropriate building, for new labor intensive businesses to grow more rapidly and increase employment opportunities within Hennepin County, Minnesota. While this facility provides adjunct business services, they are by definition just that - adjunct business services. Th-- twhole concept and the related providing work opportunities for the worker. It is focused on the hum an rapidly changing society. business objectives is focused on "disadvantaged" and the "dislocated" need and the human resource in a Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 HERO is proposed as a method to stimulate economic growth for the purpose of creating jobs for disadvantaged persons and dislocated workers. The establishing of a Small Business Incubator /Accelerator facility, provides a partial incentive for employers who are potential creators of jobs for the targeted populations. The presence of the facility, however, is not in itself the factor which will induce small business owners to create employment opportunities for persons with barriers to successful job performance. Other incentives, such as training programs designed for the specific needs of individual employers, wage subsidies and tax credits, are available through publically funded programs. I*.'Hennepin County, an abundance of effective programming exists which can be used to assist developing employers to create jobs for the disadvantaged and the dislocated worker. Resources to assist the employer and the prospective employee include: federal job training funds from the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), state wage subsidy monies from the Minnesota Employment and Economic Development (MEED) Act, wage subsidies through AFDC grant diversion, specifically developed training programs through the Hennepin Technical Centers and other training institutions, and pre - screening of potential employees by professional employment and training staff under contract to the County. Although federal and state funds for the above activities are available in lesser amounts than in past years, the County's Employment and Training system continues to develop new funding sources. Recently programs have been developed through federal and state grants to provide re- employment services to workers dislocated from the Control Data Corporation. Programs for workers who have been dislocated, have recently been implemented in the County. There has been continuous federal support for employment and training efforts for several decades. This support rises and declines in relation to economic conditions and the level of unemployment. These fluctuations in the dollar level of support notwithstanding, initiatives such as described in this plan can gain access to funds which may be used to increase the employability of the disadvantaged and the dislocated worker. BUSINESS PLAN: HERO 1/15/87:RSA:05 -6- LOCUION OF THE FACILITY & BASIC auXERIA Since the Hennepin County is a geographical entity on the map, with certain demographic characteristics descriptive of the two constituencies "disadvantaged" and "dislocated ", an informed judgmental decision was possible regarding the target area for searching for an appropriate facility. This area is bounded on the north by HWY 694, on the south by HWY 494, on the east by HWY 100 and on the west by HWY 18. More than three dozen buildings have been inspected and rejected for one or more reasons. However, it does not appear that basic criteria are overly stringent, and the situation has developed of having two or more buildings that represent serious fully qualified possibilities. 7he experience to date strongly suggests that a number of appropriate buildings exist and it is a business decision as to which one should finally be selected for the incubator /accelerator facility. There are three set of criteria that need to be met by the building and its location. The first relates to the corporate tenants, the second to the prospective business employees from the two designated constituencies . of need, and third set profiles the characteristics of the facility. CORPORATE TENART CRITERIA: Since the emphasis is on labor intensive products and services, the business has to identify the facility as providing easy and speedy access to its customers and clients. It has to be well situated in terms of the highway system in the county. It must provide an opportunity for easy handling of shipments in and shipments out, in specific terms such as loading docks. There must be free parking for customers and visitors. The utilities must be inexpensive and appropriate to labor intensive activities involving a variety of different kinds of equipment. There must be security for employees at all hours, as well as products and equipment. Finally, there has to be access to adjunct services, such as bookkeeping and word processing, at competitive market rates. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 -7- EMPLOYEE CRITERIA, IN TERMS ESPECIALLY OF THE DISADVANTAGED AND DISLOCATED: It follows that the facility can not be remote from concentrations, for example of the "disadvantaged." The target area designated relates to these concentrations in the county. Not only is distance critical, public transportation has to be accessible and available for the facility. Free parking for employees, with transportation, is also critical. There has to be some viable relationship to fast food and shopping resources, especially for single heads of household. By the same token, child care resources are planned for the facility to be managed on an independent basis. Finally, the facility will house resources oriented to training and counseling those employees with the need. FACILWY PILES IN TERM OF BASIC (1tiTERIA. Since the focus of the iniative is on the human resources, corporate tenant criteria and employee criteria have been dealt with first. Ne.'ertheless, certain basic parameters have been developed which relate to the size of the facility, and the level and extent of the activity. These criteria are not absolute, but relative and clearly numbers which represent an order of magnitude. First, it is planned that the facility has at least thirty thousand square feet of net rental space. This means that common areas are excluded, such as restrooms, corridors, reception area and administrative offices, from the estimated square footage. Second, it is thought that the tenant population will be in the range of fifteen to twenty corporate tenants. Thirdly, an energy efficient building is necessary in the state of Minnesota. Fourth, the plan is presently for a flat rental fee of three dollars per square foot, which includes utilities, taxes, insurance along with management charges. It has to be repeated that the market in Hennepin county for commercial and industrial space is highly competitive and likely to become more so in the foreseeable future. Quality space is widely available in the three to four dollar range. The fifth consideration is that the building be available for purchase, or acquisition and /or use on a nominal fee basis. The sixth criteria is that the facility be in an attractive and visible location, and finally it must be as already indicated viable in terms of highly competitive market alternatives. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 -8- The initiative is unique in its focus on human resources, but it has to be perceived to be so, and seen as truly focused, in practical terms, on the needs of both the disadvantaged and dislocated worker. Subsidized training, education assistance and work experience are the themes which must explain the initiative and produce the appropriate level of funding and support. There are four distinct considerations in terms of funding. First, money has to be found to pursue this iniative. Second, money or support, has to result in the acquisition of an appropriate building or facility. Third, money must be available for building modifications or renovation. Fourth and finally, there has to be an appropriate operating budget which allows the iniative to become self - supporting. YOW TO PURSUE INIATIVE: At this poin in time, the Private Industry Council for Hennepin county has passed a resolution to provide fifteen thousand dollars seed money if the final plan is approved by ccgmdttee and the council as a whole. If the council decided not to approve, the option would still exist to seek support in this amount from a private corporate foundation in the Twin Cities. A great deal of work has already been done, but this money would support development activity over an estimated twelve month period. This initial budget has to support over a twelve month period HERO communication (written and telephone), documentation (budget and funding), information (demographic and vocational) presentations-(slide and hand -outs) and travel to obtain immediately the funds needed and to create for the immediate future an informed participative and supportive network throughout the camtmnity. MONEY TO PURCBASE A FACIWTY: There are a number of options to raise the approximately four hundred and fifty thousands dollars required to buy an appropriate building. It should be noted that there are a number of other possibilities that provide the same or a better outcome. First, in terms of options requiring money and then, second, in terms of options not requiring a purchase price. MONEY OPTION: !ME FIRST OF THESB IS REPRESFl RED BY CCHM Uff DEVE OEMW BLOCK GRANT FUNDS: This can take the form of a grant, or a no interest loan. By way of illustration, twenty thousand dollars a year from five conounities can be sought; involving such communities as St. Louis Park, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Edina and New Hope. This involves, of course, getting the support of interested and responsible persons in each of the designated catmmnities. Business Plan: Hero 01/15/87:RSA:05 0 -9- The second option, which is relevant, is that Henne2in County might provide the immediate purchase price through using the unexpended balance from the discretionary account as related to the Community DevelomLent Block Grant Funds. UNFUNDED OPTIONS: These apply only to the acquisition of the building or facility as such. The first of these has already been explored with one corporation; it involves the corporation turning over the building for a nominal sum and taking the tax write -off. A second option is the outright gift of a building by an individual or corporation. A third option is that HERO takes possession of a building for a five year period at nominal cost, with an option to buy in the future. Obviously, an unfunded option has relevance for this iniative since it allows focus on the much more modest budgets related to modification and /or renovation, and critically the operating budget. It is intended to preservere with these options. However, the unfunded options represent, in combination, only about a ten percent possibility. ICY TO MODIFY A FACILITY: The first option is that the money will come from a start -up grant from the Minnesota Department of Energy and Development. This is difficult to reference except in relationship to a specific building, but it is estimated not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars. The second option is that this money will come from a grant f rom the Federal Economic Development Administration. This second approach requires the active support of both the Minnesota Department of MerW and Develg=nt and the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training. MONEY TO STAR -UP THE FACILITY: The first option is to seek start-up monies in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars from again the Minnesota Department of Energy and Development and /or the Federal Economic Develoment Administration. The attached pro forma budget assumes that almost twenty -five thousand dollars will be lost in the first year of operation, but in subsequent years the operation will show a positive deviation in excess of thirty thousand dollars in 188, 189 and 190 and be self- supporting thereafter. The money sought is therefore seed money only. In terms of start -up monies, it covered by the seed money granted fourth in the budget pro forma fo r after the second year. Business Plan: Hero is important that contingencies be to HERO since it is planned as set the initiative to be self - supporting 1/15/87:RSA:05 1 1e � w -10- V•J Iti y' .�4�h' •' V :I: :I:r I:r• 1 :+••. • 1 •+ HERO exists as a legal entity, as a 501 C 3 Corporation in the state of Minnesota. It was created by two members of the Private Industry Council (PIC) , with the advice and suggestions of several other individual members. If the council as a whole approves the developmental budget of fifteen thousand dollars, a board of directors will be selected and elected. In any case, persons willing to serve will be identified, but a board will not be constituted until an initial grant is approved. In parallel with the process of seeking the approval of the PIC, presentations will be made to the Minnesota Department of Energy and Development as well as the Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training to seek their reaction, input and active support for funding of the operating budget. If this support is forthcoming, an approach will then be made to the Federal Economic Development Administration for a modification and renovation budget related to a specific building. The timing of this approach is contingent upon finding a suitable building. Again in parallel with the PIC activity and the initiative with the state agencies, continued efforts will be made to identify a building which will not require raising funds from the communities to buy the facility. Only if the unfunded alternatives fail completely to produce an appropriate building in an appropriate location will the communities be approached for funds, through the Community Development Block Grant Funds. They will be approached, in any case, however, in terms of explaining the initiative and seeking their active participation and support. In summary then, first a planning and developmental budget will be sought fray the Private Industry Council by March 1987. Second, an operating budget will be sought from the two designated state agencies. Third, a building will be obtained, preferably through "an unfunded mechanism." Fourth, the Federal agency will be approached for renovation and modification dollars. Fifth, the active support of the communities will be sought. Finally, it is anticipated and planned that these activities will consume the better part of 1987, to produce a successful outcome. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 t -11- Three immediate objectives are represented for the HERO facility upon support and funding being completed. These are first to achieve an annual rate of two thousand and fifty thousand qualified man hours or the approximate equivalent of one hundred full -time employees and sixty part -time employees, identified as "disadvantaged" and "dislocated" workers. Second, for the incubation to be fully operational within three months of obtaining possession of the building. Third and lastly to complete the first twelve months of activity and not incur a deficit in excess of twenty -five thousand dollars, and then to move on to a positive deviation in the second year of activity. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 { -12- :y 1ST MONTH: Development final draft of business plan. First presentations to state and federal agencies. 2ND MONTH: Initial grant approved by Hennepin PIC Committee. First presentations to communnities and county. 3RD MONTH: Initial grant approved by Hennepin PIC. Further presentations to state and federal agencies. 4TH MONTH: HERO board members and officers elected. Network support activities initiated. 5TH MONTH: Final presentations to communities, as well as state and federal agencies. 6TH MONTH: Final selection of appropriate building from short list. 7TH MONTH: Final funding approved by communities, county, state and federal agencies. 8TH MONTH: Solicitation of prospective tenants. Implementation of T.E.A. interface. 9TH MONTH: Final acquisition of appropriate building. Building changes and modification. 10TH MONTH: First tenants move into facility; intensive publicity regarding IMM start -up. 11TH MONTE: Implementation of funded training and work experiment activities: further publicity and marketing. 127H MONTH: Revision of budgets and projects based on first quarter activities. Business Plan: Hero 1/15/87:RSA:05 REOUEST FOR PURCHASE VI. A. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. - City Engineer & Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 13, 1987 Material Description (General Specificati n 11 Contract 487 -4 (Eng) - Lift Stations Remodeling - Improvement No.'s 87 -3 & 87 -4 Lift Station No. 4 - W. 41st St. between Monterey Ave. & Lynn Ave. Lift Station No. 5 - Corner of Grimes & Inglewood Ave. Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Pipeco CL.ztracting 2. Richmar Construction 3. G. L. Contracting 4. D. H. Blattner & Sons Department Recommendation: Funded from Capital Plan Amount of Quote or Bid $49,899.00 $55,560.00 $65,640.28 $70,700.00 Pipeco Contracting $49,899.00 i Engineering & Public Works Signatur Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is ✓ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John lallin, Finance r for City nager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: nneth Roslar@, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI. B. -TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: March 13, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Traffic Paint Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Ouote or Bid 1• Vogel Paint & Wax Co. $5,255.50 2. Earl F. Anderson (County Bid) $5,763.00 3. Gopher Sign $6,400.50 Department Recommendation: Vogel Paint & Wax Co. $5,255.50 r Publ i r Wo kG Siegnaturwo Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is -/ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. n uv�, (oo ohn Wallin, Finance D' a or City MAager's Endorsement: / 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: /, ,1 11�7 Ken*bth Roslan&,fity Manager 1 . REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: TED PAULFRANZ, FIRE CHIEF VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Reconstruction of 1977 Pumper - - ,Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc. 2. 3. Department Recommendation: Recommend award of bid to C sto Fir 'A'ppar tus Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is is not Signatulre VI.C. Amount of Quote or Bid $77,850.00 FTRF Department /��nwithin the amount budget for the purchase, /�/onry 4ku ., �It �rprh OL`kOkr�i.5 ✓Y�lot� ._. e' /vt� �'or arc (� r} fKI x 9 c,J John Wallin, Finance Director City nanager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: i Vi. C. M E M O R A N D U M DATE.: March 12, 1987 'rn: 1 "en Rosla.nd, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fl-re Chief SUBJECT: Reconstruction Bid - -- 1977 Pumper I have reviewed the bid documents and specifications for the above - referenced project. It is my recommendation that the City Council award the bid to Custom Fire Apparatus, Inc., for $77,850.00. Because of the special concerns surrounding this bid, I have asked the Fire Department Staff to re- examine our "reconstruction program "; specifically, the specifications, future plans and other options. In arriving at my recommenc- ition, I have asked the following four questions that are central to this issue: 1. Why_is the work needed at_this time? There is little doubt that we are overdue in attending to the serious corrosion problems involving this pumper. This is not just cosmetic rust. corrosion is attacking and destroying the load- supporting elements of the vehicle body, resulting in additional and unnecessary damage. Tools and equipment cannot be carried in some of the compartments because floors, doors and latching parts are not reliable. The vehicle cannot continue in first -line service without special attention. We do not have reserve or back -up vehicle and reliability is of.prime concern. Our original plans called for this work to be undertaken Last year. Funds were not available at that time. 2. Do the specifications exclude or eliminate other bidders? Our specifications are complete and thorough. we expect bids to meet specifications; however,'we anticipate and provide for exceptions. There are very few references to specific brand names, and where so referenced, such equipment is available to all manufacturers. The specifications provide a level of standardization necessary for safe and effective operation with minimal training time. It is important to point out that the specifications are the result of and reflect our experience, both good and bad. With these specifications, we are attempting to avoid known problems (i.e., corrosion) and to secure advantage of new improvements. It is not our purpose to exclude bidders. 3. Why -_did we receive only one bid? This reconstruction work is somewhat unique and, as such, we have few interested companies in a quite limited area of manufacture -- -that of fire equipment. We sent the bids to five known manufacturers in two states. The last time rae took bids on this type of work (1985), we had two interested romnanies. These two have since combined. I believe the work has limited interest because of additional costs, risks and warranties associated with rebuilding an older vehicle. Memo: 1977 Pumper Reconstruction March 12, 187 Page 2 4. why is the bid $13,000 over estimates_ Our estimate of $65,000 was based on the previous work completed in 1985. The estimate did not take into account numerous (30) additional improvements provided for in the specifications. Of special note is the use of stainless steel and a new crew cab design not considered in 1985. Clearly, one of the reasons for rebuilding the vehicle is to take advantage of such improvements in materials, design and equipment. Naturally we can justify each based on cost benefit, safety or operations effectiveness. Our purpose in this reconstruction program is to secure the value of a new vehicle at approximately half, the current cost. The bottom line is that an equivalent new pumper would cost $155,000 to $165,000. we estimate the existing vehicle to be north approximately $35,000.00. As such, this proposal remains the best alternative. TRP /ras VII. A. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian; SUBJECT: Vierkant's Proposal For Yard Waste Composting In Edina Morningside DATE: March 13, 1987 Vierkant Disposal presently provides the refuse collection service to the Edina - Morningside residents. Vierkant Disposal offers their services to the residents on a twice a week basis ad has been doing so since the City -of Edina discontinued contracting this area. Vierkant Disposal wishes to implement a yard waste composting program for the Edina - Morningside Area this spring. The yard waste composting program will be implemented utilizing a separate truck which will circulate through the Edina - Morningside -area collecting bags of yard waste. The contents of the bags will be loaded into the truck and transported to the Hennepin County composting site. This collection will be done at no additional cost to the Edina - Morningside residents. Vierkant Disposal believes they can cover the cost of this service by the reduction in their landfill tipping fees resulting from the diversion of yard wastes from the landfilled refuse. However, to keep the cost of collection of yard waste down,_.. Vierkant Disposal is asking that yard wastes be placed at the curb to reduce their labor costs. Gary Vierkant has asked to appear before the Edina City Council on Monday, h1arch 16, 1987 to seek approval by the Council. Attached is a copy of the flyer Vierkant Disposal will use. I would suggest that reference to containers for yard wastes other than the trash bags be removed from the flyer. Also, Janet Chandler has attached information relating to composting of yard waste for the Edina City Council information. COMPOSTING The volume of garbage from a community can be significantly reduced by diverting yard wastes (leaves, grass clippings) into a composting process. Hennepin County estimates that yard wastes make up .9% of the waste stream. In Edina this amounts to over 4,500 tons a year. Since most householders bag leaves and grass clippings separately from garbage; a compost collection program could be relatively easy to accomplish. In otter to encourage composting, Hennepin County is informing trash haulers that they may bring yard waste to the county's composting sites at no cost. In turn, trash haulers are planning how to implement separate yard waste pick -up for their customers. Materials brought to the composting site would be designated to a certain area so that the tonnage can be "credited" to the city of origin. For example; in the Fall of 1986 Edina delivered 220 tons of leaves to the compost site from the city street cleanup. Any increase in compost tonnage will help Edina qualify for a greater percentage of funding from Hennepin County for our Recycling Program. Funding is available for net costs of recycling programs as shown below: 50% funding for 0 to 5% reduction of waste stream _ 60% funding for 5% to 10% reduction of waste stream 70% funding for 10% to 16% reduction of waste stream 80% funding for greater than 16% reduction of waste stream Edina qualified for 50% funding for 1986. I hope we will be eligible for 60% in 1987. Janet Chandler, Recycling Coordinator r- w ti ; ;!; ERNEST A. VIERKANT VIERKANT DISPOSAL COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL March 6, -1987 TO THE CITIZENS OF THE EDINA- MORNINGSIDE AREA 9049 XERXES AVENUE 30. MINNEAPOLIS. MN 29410 ►MONKS 931.1909 We at VIERKANT DISPOSAL would like to propose a compost- recycling project for this neighborhood. Due to the high cost of landfilling, we would like to separate all leaves, grass and garden debris from the .r"ibbish. Brush and tree limbs cannot be included as -they will not be accepted by the compost site. Leaves etc. would thus be hauled separately to Hennepin County's composting area at no additional charge to $rou. This could either be done with plastic bags or cans or any other proper containers. We would like the materials placed at the curb. Our truck would be in the neighborhood between the hours of .6 :00 AM and 9 :00 AM on Mon., Tues., Thurs., and Fri. Any returnable containers used for this will be put back at the proper place with the rest of your rubbish contain- ers or a place of your request. Pickup may also be expanded to Wed. and Sat. on request or weather interference. If this service is used it should eliminate extra charges for maximum overages per rubbish pickup. We at VIERKANT DISPOSAL, appreciate your patronage and. trust that you will cooperate with us on this matter. Very truly yours, Vierkant Disposal VII. B: Consent Agenda M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: BEER LICENSE RENEWALS DATE: MARCH 12, 1987 The following businesses have applied for renewal of licenses for the year April 1, 1987 to April 1, 1988, which in accordance with Ordinance No. 902 require approval by the City Council before renewal licenses can be. issued: On -Sale Beer Licenses Off -Sale Beer Licenses Biltmore Bowl Braemar Golf Course Bravo! Italian Specialties Corelli's Pizza & Pasta Dayton's Food Service Camelot Golf Course Donaldson's Minnesota Room Edina American Legion Post Edina Golf Dome Ediner Restaurant Empress Restaurant Jerry's Foods Original Pancake House The Pantry Southdale Bowl St. Louie Rib Company Szechuan Star Restaurant T.J.'s Family Restaurant Edina Superette Holiday Stations, Inc. Kenny's Market Red Owl Country Store Superamerica Station I would recommend that the Concil approve these renewals, subject to final clearance and approval by the Police Department as not all applications for renewal have been completely processed as of this date. M E M O R A N D U M TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER L� FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK __ r'Y� SUBJECT: TEMPORARY ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE - OUR LADY OF GRACE DATE: MARCH 13, 1987 An application has been received from Our Lady of Grace Church for a temporary 3.2 On -Sale Beer License for May 2, 1987. The application has been approved by the Police Department. VII.0 Ordinance No. 902, Sec. 14(b) states "Not more than two (2) such licenses shall be issued to any one corporation or organization in a calendar year, and there shall be at least ninety (90) days between the license issue dates ". Our Lady of Grace Church was issued a temporary 3.2 On -Sale Beer License for a church function (square dance and dinner) for February 7, 1987. Because ninety days will not have elapsed between the two events, a letter has been submitted asking that the Council grant the license and waive the 90 -day interval requirement. A.copy of the letter is attached. This should be placed on the March 16 Council Agenda for action by the Council. MICHAEL J. O'ROURKE ATTORNEY AT LAW COMMERCE BUILDING PHONE SUITE 201 (612) 888-0534 8200 HUMBOLDT SO. OR MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431 (612) 888 -9453 March 3, 1987 Ms. Marcella Daehn City Clerk City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street- Edina, MN 55424 Re: Our Lady of Grace 3.2 Permit Mexican Orphanage Festival Deer Ms. Daehn: - I am sending this letter in connection with the application of Our Lady of Grace to obtain a permit for 3.2 beer sale at the May 2 Mexican Orphanage Festival. It is my understanding that approval of the application will require a waiver of the 90 day interval which is called for by the Ordinance. The first Application was made on behalf of the parish in �_7 'g� connection with its annual square dance. The Festival is being held at Our Lady of Grace but for the benefit of the Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. St. Patrick's Church is also a joint sponsor with Our Lady of Grace. I don't know if this is a distinction which is meaningful in relation to the letter and intent of the Ordinance, but it does account for the close proximity of these events. In other words, the May 2.event for the benefit of the Mexican Orphanage is being held on a timetable established by the Friends of the Orphans, rather than in accordance with the agenda of Our Lady of Grace. We are hopeful that the Council will grant the permit and waive the normal 90 day interval. I would be most happy to supply any additional information, and make an appearance before the Council if that would be of any benefit. Thank you for your consideration of our request. You very tru y Michael J. O'Rourke cc: Joanne O�Neill Bob Bowler License 'No. Date February 24, 1987 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 APPLICATION FOR LICENSE UNIVERSAL FORM Name of Establishment Our Lady of Grace Church FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Address 5071 Eden Avenue 55436 Phone No. 929 -3317 Zip Code Type of License Desired Temporary On -sale 3.2 Beer License - May 2, 1987 Mexican Fiesta Description of Operation Dinner - Mass - Children's Program - Games. Jointly sponsored by Our Lady of Grace, St. Patricks and Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. (Charitable gambling exemption applied for separately.) NOTE: THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED UNLESS ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. dame of Manager Robert Thomas Cassidy First Full Middle Last 30.00 (Person directly responsible for operation) 5071 Eden Avenue 929 -3317 0310"T Address of Manager Phone No. Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year) 6/14/30 `l References: (1) Name Robert W. Bowler Phone No. 929 -5405 (Local) Address 5721 Bernard Place, Edina," MN 55436 - (2 ) Name Robert W. Lannan , Jr.- Address 4118 Sunnyside Rd. , Edina, MN Phone No. 920 -2305 55424 Owners (if corporation, list principal officers): Name (1) Birthdate First Full Middle Last Month, day and year) Address Phone No. References: (1) Name Phone No. '_ocal ) Address (2) Name Address Phone No. 17, - z,,; Dept. Approved Date ` i Police 65 (� Fire Health Building Planning i Park Council City M r Clerk Address 5071 Eden Avenue 55436 Phone No. 929 -3317 Zip Code Type of License Desired Temporary On -sale 3.2 Beer License - May 2, 1987 Mexican Fiesta Description of Operation Dinner - Mass - Children's Program - Games. Jointly sponsored by Our Lady of Grace, St. Patricks and Minnesota Friends of the Orphans. (Charitable gambling exemption applied for separately.) NOTE: THIS APPLICATION CANNOT BE PROCESSED UNLESS ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED. dame of Manager Robert Thomas Cassidy First Full Middle Last 30.00 (Person directly responsible for operation) 5071 Eden Avenue 929 -3317 0310"T Address of Manager Phone No. Birthdate of Manager (Month, day and year) 6/14/30 `l References: (1) Name Robert W. Bowler Phone No. 929 -5405 (Local) Address 5721 Bernard Place, Edina," MN 55436 - (2 ) Name Robert W. Lannan , Jr.- Address 4118 Sunnyside Rd. , Edina, MN Phone No. 920 -2305 55424 Owners (if corporation, list principal officers): Name (1) Birthdate First Full Middle Last Month, day and year) Address Phone No. References: (1) Name Phone No. '_ocal ) Address (2) Name Address Phone No. 17, - z,,; r' Application For License r. Page Two Name (2) Birthdate _ First Full Middle Last (Month, day and year Address References: (1) Name (Local) Address (2) Name Address Phone No. Phone No. Phone No.. Name (3) _Birthdate First Full Middle Last Month, day and year Address References: (1) Name (Local) Address (2) Name Address Phone No. Phone No. Phone No. Has the applicant, or if the applicant be a partnership, the partners, or if the applicant be a corporation, the principal officers and managers, and the named manager ever been convicted of a criminal offense other than a traffic offense? NO If so, state the information as to the time, place and nature of such offense: I, being duly sworn on oath, depose and say that the statements herein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I have read and understand all laws and ordinances pertaining to the operation of the above listed establishment in the..City of Edina. It is agreed to notify the City Clerk in writing within 48 hours of any changes of the above listed personnel. I understand that any payment submitted with this application will be promptly deposited by the City, but such deposit shall not constitute ac ptance of the appli n y the City and the applicant must meet all requirements for the 1' ens% prior to iss nce. Date February 24, 1987 License Fee Enclosed $ 30.00 Signed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, as to thisS day o February, 1987 .v Gam, pplicant's signature Manager's Signature 6ikea A1. Zc= H"nepin Cwjnty wrr My Cam. Exp,114M vII.D. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Leslie Turner and Gordon Hughes , SUBJECT: MARCH 21, 1987, STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP DATE: March 13, 1987 Attached for your review and use are: 1) the proposed March 21, 1987, agenda; 2) the adopted Mission Statement; and 3) a "thought organizer" to help you prepare for the workshop. We will be glad to answer questions concerning these. items at the March 16th Council Meeting. LT, GH /sw Attachment 4 A G E N D A MARCH 21, 1987 STRATEGIC PLANNING WORKSHOP 8:00 - 8:45 Overview of Strategic Planning Process Review Successes of Past Year 8:45 - 10:30 Identify Issues Facing the City in next 1 -3 Years 10:30 Break 10:45 - 11:45 Discussion of Issue #1 11:45 Lunch 12:30 Discussion of Issue #2 1:15 Discussion of Issue #3 2:00 Subgroups Define Issues and Goals and Possible Strategies 2:30 Subgroups Present Issues to Large Groups 3:00 Evaluation (Council Only) 3:30 Adjourn MISSION STATEMENT THE ^IISSION OF THE CITY OF EDINA IS TO DO OUR PART IN MAINTAINING EDINA AS A PREMIER COINIUNITY IN THE TWIN CITIES AREA. Key Words "Our Part." Many factr•rs contribute to Edina's success - -its schools, churches, neighborhoods, and most of all, its residents. Our obligation is to do our part; i.e. provide municipal services in a way that meets the standards imposed by our constituency. If we do our part well, others will follow our example. "Maintaining as Premier." Premier means second to none. Edina has earned the reputation of being a highly desirable place to live and work. We will strive to maintain that reputation, guided by the following values: Efficient and Effective Municipal Services. We will strive to provide the most appropriate municipal services to the community. We will scrutinize new programs or services before implementation to determine if they are most appropriately provided by other governmental units or if they can best be provided by our residents themselves or by private enterprise. Fiscal Responsibility. We believe in a conservative approach to government spending. We also believe that Edina should be principally responsible for the generation of its revenue which results in a government which is most responsive to its citizens. Balanced Land Uses. investment in single including commercial, opportunities for all complete community of We place a high value on protecting Edina's enormous family homes. We also favor a diversity of land uses industrial, parkland and open space as well as housing segments of the population, in order to provide a the highest standards. Metropolitan Citizenship. Edina is part of a larger community and as such will participate in metropolitan issues, influence metropolitan policies and assume a reasonable share of metropolitan obligations consistent with our principles of local control. Volunteers. Citizen participation is a key element in effective local government. One of our greatest assets is our informed and involved citizenry whom we will continue to involve in all practical aspects of the governmental process. _ Investment in Infrastructure. Maintenance of our public facilities in sound condition makes economic sense by avoiding costly replacement and inefficient operation. Furthermore, it encourages a similar investment by the private sector. Therefore, we will strive to maintain our infrastructure through a program of capital planning. Innovation. Although we are not a business organization, we believe the City should operate in a business -like manner. Creating value in our services is important. Therefore, we must continually pursue better ways to provide quality services to create greatest value for our citizens. Human Resources. We recognize the importance of attracting and retaining outstanding employees. We will, therefore, strive to be an employer who provides a challenging and rewarding work experience. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 26, 1987 Edina City Council Strategic Planning Workshop "Thought Organizer" A. Review the Mission Statement. Underline what you believe to be priority areas. B. List four situations or trends that you have observed in the community or elsewhere that you believe will or is impairing our ability to carry out the mission. 1. 2. 3. .._ 4. C. Do the same for those external situations that you believe are supportive of our mission performance. 1. 2. 3. 4. D. Now think about the City organization itself (staff, facilities, finances, management, attitudes, etc.) and list four things you observe as making achievement of mission more difficult. 1. 2. 3. 4. Page t E. Do the same for those internal situations you observe as being a real plus in terms of our mission performance. 1. 2. 3. 4. F. Now review all of the above and extract the four issues that you believe are most critical to our future success. Could be either weaknesses to correct or strengths to build on. Issue 1 Issue 2 Issue 3 Issue 4 - Priun-�2@i G. For each of the four items you identified as most critical, jot down a few ideas as to what we might do about it. Issue 1 Issue 2 Issue 3 Issue 4 510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 227 -8017 P. 0. BOX 848 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903 (507) 288-3156 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612) 475 -0373 350 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212) 415-9200 DORSEY & WHITNEY A Partnership Including Professional Corporations 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612) 340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0605 TELECOPIER: (612)340 -2868 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. (612) 340 -2659 Ms. Marcella Daehn City of Edina 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 March 13, 1987 201 DAVIDSON BUILDING 8 THIRD STREET NORTH GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 (406) 727 -3632 304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III 550 NORTH 31- STREET P. 0. BOX 1179 BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (406) 252 -3800 30 RUE LA BOETIE 75008 PARIS, FRANCE 011 331 562 32 50 Re: Amendment to Homart Settlement Agreement Dear Marce: I enclose herewith a letter to the City Council and Ken Rosland relative to the above referenced amendment, extending the time for the I -494 study by six months. Will you please put this in the packet for the City Council. Very truly yours, Thomas S. Erickson TSE:jd enclosure 510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER 445 MINNESOTA STREET ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 (612) 227 -8017 P. O. BOX 848 340 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903 (507) 288 -3156 315 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391 (612)475 -0373 350 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022 (212) 415 -9200 VII. E. DORSEY & WHITNEY A Partnership Including Professional Corporations 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 201 BUILDING (612) 340 -2600 B THIRD S TRE ET NORTH TELEX 29-0605 GREAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401 TELEOOPIER: ( 612)340 -2868 (406)727 -3632 304 TRANSWESTERN PLAZA III 550 NORTH 31- STREET P. 0. BOX 1179 THOMAS S. ERICKSON, P. A. BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103 (612) 340 -2659 (406) 252 -3800 30 RUE LA BOETIE O March 13, 1987 7 75008 PARIS, FRANCE Oil 331 562 32 50 Honorable Members of Edina City Council and Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Homart Settlement Agreement Gentlemen: The Settlement Agreement between Edina, Bloomington, Homart and the Metropolitan Council provided, in part, that that Council would undertake a study of the I -494 corridor. That study was to be completed within eighteen months from the date of this agreement, that is, by May 15, 1987. The City has now received a request from the Metropolitan Council for an amendment to the Settlement Agreement extending that eighteen month period to twenty -four months, or until November 15, 1987. The amendment will have to be agreed to by all parties, i.e., Edina, Bloomington, Homart and the Metropolitan Council. That agreement is now being circulated among those parties. If that extension is acceptable to the City Council, I recommend that a motion be adopted approving such six -month extension, subject to the approval of all of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to sign such an amendment to the Settlement Agreement, again subject to execution of that same amendment by all of the other parties to the Settlement Agreement. Very truly yours, Tho as S. Erick on TSE:jd VII. F. M E M O R A N D UM TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Gordon Hughes SUBJECT: DEER DATE: March 13, 1987 At their last meeting, the Council asked for an update concerning the deer population study. Last November, we reported that the Department of Natural Resources suggested that an aerial survey be conducted to estimate the present deer population. This survey would provide the basis for their recommendations as to a control program. As you know, the DNR is ultimately responsible for any control measures. Successful aerial surveys depend upon adequate snow cover (without such snow cover, it is difficult to spot deer from the aircraft). Because of the unusual winter, John Parker, the area wildlife manager, reports that an aerial survey was not possible.. Apparently, there is no other feasible method of assessing the magnitude of the deer proglem. Therefore, I'm sorry to report that we seem to have no alternative than to delay the project until next winter. GH /sw IX. A. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: STATE LEGISLATION DATE: March 13, 1987 Attached are seven policies that I will.discuss with you on Monday night. The reason for this fast action is that our lobbyists feel that we must get to the State Legislators quickly . regarding these seven items. Also ati sched is some supporting information regarding these proposals.. There will be a special meeting of the MLC Board of Directors on March 25th at which time we want to give our City Council's input. KR /sw Attachment C MUNICIPAL LBUSIATIVE 1500 Northland Plaza 3800 West 80th Street Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 (612) 893 -6650 MLC BOARD OF DIRECTORS SPECIAL MEETING Wednesday, March 15, 1987 Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 50th Street, Edina 5 :00 -- 6:00 p.m. AGENDA Policy 1 The Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) opposes the Governor's 1987 Property Tax Proposal. (Although portions of the Governor's Proposal could be supported standing alone, in aggregate the proposal should not be adopted by the Legislature.) Policy 2 The MLC opposes any legislation which would extend the sales tax and motor vehicle excise tax to local units of government. (This proposal is estimated to cost local units of government $46.4 million annually.) Policy 3 The MLC supports legislation which would expand Minnesota's present sales tax base item s . (This policy would accomplish two important objectives. First, additional revenue could be raised whi:': could be used for additional property tax relief or other budget items, such as eliminating the sales tax on local units of government. Second, an expanded base would result in more stability in state government finance. Please see the enclosed attachment.) Policy 4 The MLC supports legislation which would impose the 6% sales tax on the wholesale price of gasoline. The funds raised from this tax would be dedicated to the trunk ighway tund or would be used to replace the lost revenue due to the transfer of the motor vehicle excise tax from the general fund to the trunk highway fund. MLC Special Board Meeting Agenda March 25, 1987 Page Z Policy 5 The MLC opposes any changes in the appropriation and /or amount of homestead credit dollars going to local units of government. Policy G The MLC supports legislation which retains the appropria- tion for local government aid (LGA) at its current level. Should LGA payments be reduced, the reduction should be proportional. Policy 7 The MLC opposes all-four property tax reform components proposed by the Coalition of Outstate Cities. (This includes the tax base equalization, commercial property tax credit, distressed area industrial credit, and reduction in agricultural land values.) M EXPANDING THE MINNESOTA SALES TAX BASE FACTS: Minnesota's state sales tax was enacted at a 3% rate in 1967 and was increased to 4% in 1971. The 4% rate re- mained intact for 10 years. Then on July 1, 1981, it was "temporarily" increased to 5 %. On January 1, 1982, the 5% rate was made permanent and the rate was "temporarily" increased -to 6 %. The 1983 Legislature made the 6% rate permanent. Minnesota's current 6% rate is the third highest state rate in the country. Connecticut imposes the highest state rate of 7.5% and the State of Washington is second with a 6.5% rate. Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island all share the 6% level with Minnesota. Minnesota's state sales tax accounts for about $1.4 billion in tax revenues each year. This compares with an annual yield of about $2.6 billion in income taxes and $2.2 billion in net local property taxes. In addition, the 6% rate is also placed on motor vehicle sales which garners $225 million in state revenues per year. The general sales tax accounts for about 1/3 of all state general fund tax revenue. Forty -six states presently impose a sales tax on their citizens. Twenty -eight states exempt food consumed at home, and all but two states exempt prescription medicine. However, Minnesota is only one of nine states that extends the medical products exemption to non - prescription items, and is one of only five states that exempts clothing_ Each of Minnesota's neighboring states taxes clothing. Few states have extended their sales taxes broadly to services. Only six (including South Dakota and Iowa) have taxed services broadly. Minnesota does not impose a sales tax on gasoline. Ten states do impose such a tax. Thirty -six states, including Minnesota impose a sales tax on cigarettes. The table below shows Additional items. It could be reduced to neutral (1985 figures). the dollar impact on taxing also shows how much the rates make the broader base revenue ON Minnesota Sales Tax Base Page 2 Gross Revenue Equal $ Millions % Change Yield Current Base $ 1,388 -- % 6.0% Current Base Plus: Food 259 18.7 5.1 Clothing 132 9.5 5.5 Personal Services 54 3.9 5.8 Business Services 172 12.4 5.4 Food and Clothing 391 28.2 4.7 Clothing and Personal Services 186 13.4 5.3 Food, Clothing and All Services 617 31.6 4.2 Gasoline 169 12.2 5.3 Clothing, Personal Services and Gasoline 355 25.1 4.8 Clothing and Gasoline 301 21.7 4.9 Non - Prescription Medicine 10 .7 6.0 One major advantage of expanding the sales tax base is the increased revenue stability that would occur. A broader base increases stability in two ways. First, spending activity on items such as food and clothing tend to be relatively unresponsive or inelastic during economic downturns compared to "non- essential" items which are now taxed. A second means of enhancing the revenue stability of the state tax system c►culd be to adjust the intensity to which Minnesota relies on its income taxes, i.e., broaden the sales tax base and use to additional revenue to lower the income tax burden. QUESTION: Should the State Legislature broaden the sales tax base to additional items? QUESTION: If yes, should the net effect be revenue neutral? C Minnesota Sales Tax Base Page 3 MINNESOTA TAX STUDY COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Commission has found that due to the narrowness of its base., the sales tax results in an unstable source of revenue for the state, and it can contribute to budget uncertainty during times of economic fluctuation. In order to mitigate these problems, the Commission recommends that the sales tax base be extended to include new clothing and personal services. The stability, certainty and equity of the sales tax are greatly enhanced by this change. March 1987 Cities Bloomington Brooklyn Park Burnsville Eagan Eden Prairie Edina Inver Grove Hts Maple Grove Maplewood Minnetonka Plymouth Roseville Shoreview White Bear Lake Woodbury INCREASED TAXES TRANSFERRED TO MLC CITIES 13,500 28,200 1,800 6,500 -- .90 Motor 191,400 5,400 4,508 1,272 .41 46,227 -- 10,293 4,051 -- -- Sales Tax -- -- 1,487 354 1.0329 Vehicle Premium Premium Mill General Sales Tax Excise Tax -- Tax -- Levy Fund Total Tax City Employee Incr $180,000 $ -- $58,234 $19,419 $ -- -- 139,912 1,080,000 15,875 6,907 -- .50+ 91,800 156,600 36,000 6,600 -- .50 51,758 -- 23,543 3,822 184 -- 122,342 -- 30,731 6,485 -- .17 27,900 -- 2,700 2,775 -- .26 13,500 28,200 1,800 6,500 -- .90 48,600 191,400 5,400 4,508 1,272 .41 46,227 -- 10,293 4,051 -- -- 15,706 -- -- 1,487 354 1.0329 March 1987 �s IX. B. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ken Rosland FROM: Ceil Smith o/"" SUBJECT: SPACE STUDY DATE: March 13, 1987 Attached is a memorandum and plans from,Foster Dunwiddie. This is a result of Foster's work with our staff which we contracted for as a result of the Space Study Committee commissioned by the City Council. Foster details in that memo his recommendations which include an upgrading of certain areas within City Hall and an addition to City Hal 1.` The addition to City Hall and the completion of the Police Department can and should be addressed during the Capital Long -Range Planning process. The remainder of Foster's recommendations which include an upgrading and some remodeling in the areas of Administration, Planning, Engineering, Finance-and Assessing should be accomplished sometime during this calendar year and include the following: -,Carpeting throughout City Hall, including installation $24,945 - Wallpaper and paint for the upper level of City Hall 4,407 - Purchase of necessary modular office systems to 22,000 accomplish changes proposed by Mr. Dunwiddie - Materials necessary to make electrical and structural 5,700 changes TOTAL $57,052 I would recommend the funding come from the Capital Plan of which $40,000 has been budgeted for carpeting in the years 1987 and 1989, plus $10,000 budgeted and not used to complete this Space Study. I would also recommend the remaining $7,000 come from the 1987 Contingency Budget. The voting machine delay gives us the flexibility of moving some of the dollars about. CS /sw Attachment r cc: File Rosland Smith Dunwiddie Carr March 11, 1987 MD8668 MEMORANDUM Re: Edina City Hall Space Study Edina, Minnesota Fr: Foster W. Dunwiddie For the past several months we have been analyzing the existing and future space requirements for the City Departments currently housed in the Edina City Hall. As a part of this analysis, we have met with the various Department Heads to review existing and future needs of each department, prepared schematic plans for alterations and additions to the existing building to satisfy these needs and finally, prepared cost estimates for the proposed alterations and additions. We have concluded from our analysis that there is sufficient space within the existing building to meet current space needs of the City with the exception of storage. There is a need for providing adequate records storage and police property storage. This need cannot be met within the confines of the existing building. Although there is adequate space within the the existing building to meet the current needs of the City for office space, the space is poorly arranged and inefficient in some areas. The present layout has evolved over a period of years as a projection of the planning patterns established at the time the building was built in 1953. Fixed partitions, fireproof vaults, and remnants of previous use patterns, all have served to restrict flexibility and contribute to inefficiencies in the plan. For example, the Finance Department and City Assessor occupy what was the original City Council Chambers complete with raised dais, folding parti- tion and chair storage. Similarly, fireproof vaults in the center bay of the basement and first floors restrict flexibility and adaptation to modern office planning. There is adequate space within the existing building to meet current needs if these remnants are removed and the City moves toward an office systems approach to space planning utilizing movable partitions and work stations. This has already been started in the Building Inspections Department and to a lesser degree in the Finance Department and City Assessor's Office. It is our recommendation that office system planning be expanded for use in other areas of the building. The advantage of office system planning is to provide for more efficient work stations in less space. They also lend themselves to rearrangement to meet changing demands of City Departments at minimum cost. March 11, 1987 - 2 - MD8668 To meet the storage needs of the City, we would recommend the addition of storage facility on the southwest corner of the building. This addition would serve both the needs for adequate record storage and a Police Property Room. The addition would have a brick exterior to match the existing architecture of the building and is planned to permit future expansion of the City Hall along the remainder of south side of the building. We would estimate the cost of the proposed addition would be $195,000 including relocation of the existing electrical service, fees and contingency. Fwd: f wd March 11, 1987 EDINA CITY HALL SPACE STUDY EDINA, MINNESOTA COST ESTIMATE Addition - First Floor 1,440 sf - Mezzanine 672 - Basement 900 Total 3,012 sf @ X45 /sf Electrical Service Relocation = MD8668 S 135,540 14,000 Exterior Demolition _ 10,000 Total Construction Cost = 159,540 A/E Fees and Costs 19,150 Contingency (10 %) 15,950 Total Estimated Cost = 1949640 To: Ken Rosland, City Manager From: John Wallin, Finance Director Subject: Advance Refunding of 1985 Tax Increment Bonds Date: March 16, 1987 During the last several years, the tax - exempt bond market has experienced substantial changes in interest levels. During 1985, the City sold a Tax Increment bond reflecting market conditions at that time. The current market, with substantially lower interest rates, now makes it feasible and attractive for the City to refund this issue. Advance refunding is the replacement of outstanding bonds (the refunded bonds) with new lower interest rate bonds (the refunding bonds). The procedure is as follows: 1. The proceeds of the refunding bonds are placed into separate escrow accounts and invested in special treasury obligations. The overall yield of these obligations is Limited by arbitrage regulations to a rate "not materially higher" than the true interest cost of the refunding bonds. The true interest rate is different and lower than the traditional new interest cost rate because the calculation of the true interest cost excludes the cost of issuance. This is a significant change resulting from the new tax reform legislation. 2. The outstanding increment bonds carry a net interest cost of 8.9% and the new bonds are projected to carry a net interest cost of 6.2%. After excluding costs and making calculations reflecting the timing of the payments, the estimated true interest cost becomes about 6% It becomes obvious that investment at 6% will not repay a like amount carrying an interest rate of 8.9%. Therefore, an additional amount of money must be put into the escrow account to supplement the interest rate gap. This is part of what we refer to as "front money ". In addition, the front money includes accrued interest on the old bonds from their last interest payment date to the date the escrow account is established and the costs of issuance and underwriter's fees. 3. The investments in the escrow account are managed by an escrow agent and as principal and interest on the refunded bonds become due, the escrow agent makes the payment. The maturity of principal and interest of the securities in the escrow account are structured so as to provide funds in a timely manner for payments of debt service of the refunded bonds. Creation of the escrow account for the refunded bonds discharges them as an obligation of the issuer and so at that point they do not count as debt. 4. At the first date of call for the refunded bonds the escrow agent calls all refunded bonds for payment and the bondholders receive full payment for their obligations. X. A. 5. The refunding bonds are paid from the same revenue stream as the debt service of the refunded bonds was being paid. 6. When bids for the refunding bonds are opened, computations will be made as to: ... ......'.'. a. The amount of savings. b. The amount of front money. c. The availability and price of unlimited yield securities. d. The costs of issuance including the underwriting fee .e. The permitted yield on the limited yield investments. The amount of front money and total savings is sensitive to changes in interest rates. If the rate on the refunding bonds goes up both the front money requirement and the level of savings is reduced. Conversely, if the rate of the refunding bonds is less, the front money and level of savings will increase. The City's 1985 Tax Increment bonds have a call provision enabling the City to pay off the remaining principal as of January 1, 1996. This would make it feasible for the City to issue "crossover" refunding bonds. In a crossover refunding situation, only those bonds which are subject to prepayment under the terms of the original issue ate refunded. The proceeds of the new refunding issue are placed in a completely self - supporting escrow account until the first call date, which is January 1, 1996. At that time, the proceeds of the new refunding issue are released from the escrow account to pay off all the outstanding bonds on the original issue. After that point, the income the City is receiving to pay debt service on the original issue crosses over to pay debt service on the new refunding issue, it is at that time that the City begins recognizing interest. cost savings resulting from the. refunding. i 848.71 __07S015 03/05_/87 72.00 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 075015 03/10/87 17.29 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM SS 10- 4256- S10 -51 075015 03/05/87 104.68 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 -- - - - - -- 193.97 i� 075018 03/05/87 13.50 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80 075018 03/05/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 .7 * ** -CKS * +* -CKS 1987 . OF EDINA CHECK .- . -ISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 1 -- CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT__NO_. MESSAGE------. (; _,INV.._N_P__..0.. _M _ 075002 03/05/87 20.40 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 -__ 075002_ - 03/.OS/­87 15_79 _. d - 3-- 12- 36.19 + "! 075004 03/09/87 6.00 AMERICAN LINEN CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 482 -48 075004 _ _. -- 03/09/87 _ __.- 147,,42 _ --------AMER _ _ LAUNDRY_.__ - -- 10 -4262- 440 -44 075004 03/09/87 25.44 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 075004 03/09/87 113.50 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 075004 03/05/87 _- 11_52 AMERICAN LINEN _ - LAUNDRY 10-4E62-6e8-6e 075004 03/09/87 51.70 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262 - 821 -82 075004 03/09/87 55.48 AMERICAN LINEN. LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 075004 _03/-09/87-- _- . -___ -- ___56.,26 AM9_RI _CAt!_LI_NEN_- LAUNDRY 5.0_ 4262 - 861-.86- _- ___.- __-- _- ______..__ -_ 171 469.32 • " --- 075005 03/10/87 _ 37.2S AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50 -42 L4- 822 -82- 075005 03/10/87 37.25 AUDIO GROUP_ ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862-86 - -_- _ -_ 74.50 • _ 'I * * *- CK3 075008 03/11/87 -6-3..00 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY GEN SUPPLIES 1 0- 4504- 646 -64_ 075008 03/11/87 51.06 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 075008 03/11/87 39.01 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 075008,03 /11/87 _ "_ ",50_44 "- _- KAMAN_BEARING_6_SPLY REPAIR__PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 075008 03/11/87 11.20 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 _____._._ 075006 03/11/87 35.69 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 075008_ '_03/10/87 - 11.0_71, KAMAN_BEARING -6 PL _Y CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 075008 03/11/87 130.33 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 ----- " - 491.44 - - - -- * * * * ** r ** -CK3 075013 _03/11/87 95_03 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10 =4504- 325 -30 1257____ 075013 03/11/87 16.66 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 -_ 1242 075013 03/11/87 168.92 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560 -56 59802 ^• 07501303/11/87 79.30 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPA -IR PARTS 10 =4540- 560 -56 075013 03/11/87 45.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _59760 9522 075013 03/11/87 173.60 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 I„ 59796 075013 _ 03/11/87 222.92 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40- 45_04 -_ 801 - 80__1260 075013 03/11/87 47.28 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 803 -80 1253 848.71 __07S015 03/05_/87 72.00 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 075015 03/10/87 17.29 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM SS 10- 4256- S10 -51 075015 03/05/87 104.68 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23- 4256- 612 -61 -- - - - - -- 193.97 i� 075018 03/05/87 13.50 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80 075018 03/05/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 .7 * ** -CKS * +* -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 2 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE , 075018 03/05/87 12.25 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 841 -84 , 075018 03/05/87 27.00 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 861 -86 075020 03/11/87 65.78 AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 , 65.78 • » » » » »» r ++ -CKS 075025 03/11/87 31.00 ALFOkS-ANDERSSON S ERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 31.00 # , + » » * +» + +r —CKS 075028 03/10/87_______ BEER _WHOLESALERS __INVENTORY 50 —_ 4630 - 822- 82_____________ 075028 03/10/87 ______._817.10 _ 1,990.35 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 075028 03/10/87 1,635.95 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 4,443.40 + « « + «s« * ** -CKS 075031 03/10/87 12.08 ----BERTELSON--BROS INC GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 133 -12 277385 075031 03/10/87 28.79 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 241255 075031 03/11/87 25.68 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 120 -12 075031 03/11/87 246.34 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 510 -51 075031 03/11/87 78.76 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 600 -60 075031 03/11/87 5.68 BERTELSON EROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 600 -60 075031 03/11/87 25.50— BERTELSON BROS INC CREDIT 10- 4516- 600 -60 371.83 + ** *—CKS 075033 03/09/87 75.00 _ BERGFORD_TRUCKING _ INVENTORY SO-4626—See-8e.--------- 075033 03/09/87 _ 126.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 075033 03/09/87 118.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 86E -86 319.50 + * * + * «* + ** —CKS 075038 03/11/87 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 -420 -42 100.00 + 075039 03/10/87 449.24 - bk YAW ROCK PROD. INC GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 643 -64 • 449.24 r » » » »* r *+ -CKS 075047 03/09/87 4.10 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SPLY 10- 4508- 420 -42 92807 -, 075047 03/09/87 170.36 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLY 10- 4508- 420 -42 94034 075047 03/05/87 30.80 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLY 10 -4508- 440 -44 441495 205.26 + + * + » »» + *+ —CKS I, s i I 1987 C. OF EDINA CHECK F. jTER 03 -16 -87 GE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITE DESC_R P N ACC9.UXT_N.0__INV *_RO_M- MESSAGE_ 10-4540 -560 - 56_.86851______- _. -_____ - 075054 03/11/87 179.52 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 83897 075054 03/11/87 z' 075053 _ - - -,- 03/10/87. 154.60____BROWNING_ PARTS _FERRIS__- __- RUBBISH_REMOVAL _ _1.0- 075053 03/05/87 70.42 BROWNING FERRIS RUBBISH REMOVAL 28- 4250 - 702 -70 075053 03/05/87 113.17 BROWNING FERRIS RUBBISH REMOVAL _ 50- 4250 - 841 -84 075053 03/05/87 95_56 BROWNING FERRIS :UBB_I_$H� ELMO_VAL 5.(�425� @_61- @6 _ __ - -- WAREHOUSE REPAIR 433.75 s 10- 4540 - 560 -56 84077 075054 03/11/87 -- - 075054 03/11/87_ 155.90- __ - - --- _BATTERY_. WAREHOUSE REPAIR -PARTS 10-4540 -560 - 56_.86851______- _. -_____ - 075054 03/11/87 179.52 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 83897 075054 03/11/87 241.44 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10-4540- 560 -56 87668 075054 03/11/87 38.21 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 87674 075054 03/11/87 51.37 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PAR TS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 85869 075054 03/11/87 67.28 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 84077 075054 03/11/87 -- - 378, -40 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS_ _10._4540 -560-56_.85065-- ___- .- . - - -._. 1 075054 03/11/87 73.90 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 84519 075054 03/11/87 102.52 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PAR TS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 85376 - 1,288_54 • _- ssssss .1 075058 03/11/87 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 • sss -CKS I,- ssssss sss -CKS I -: 075060 03/10/87 12_4.31_ AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 04905 - . - - -- -- -- - - -.. __- - 124.31 s - - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - - -- - i�:l 075061 03/05/87 76.20 "A" PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 50004 n 76.20 I" 4: ssssss sss -CKS 075065 03/10/87 10.50 CULLIGAN CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 482 -48 I, 075066 03/11/87 s 75.00 CDP GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 540 -54 707686 75. 00 s - 075072 03/10/87 131.04 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 62890 075072 03/10/87 128.70 DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 62S89 075072 03/10/87 147.08_ DAILY CONST REPORTS ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 406.82 s 075073 03/10/87 29.10 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630_ -8 822 -82 075073 03/10/87 176.00 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 075073 03/10/87 100.25 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 "i 305.35 1� 3 ] f. Ms0*** 075075 03/05/87 126.79 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 075075 03/05/87 16.32- CLANCY DRUG INC CORRECTION 10- 4504 - 260 -26 4] 151, ]1 ]4 sss -CKS ];I 7J 1 n`I 01 i°'1 n sss -CKS 1,7;, z' 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 075075 03/05/87 075075 03/05/87 075075 03/05/87 075075 03/05/87 I 075075 03/11/87--- - 075075 - _03/05/87_ 03%05/87 075078 03/11/87 075078 _ 03/10/87 075078 03/11/87 075078 03/10/87 075078 03/11/87--- 075080 03/11/87 075080 03/11/87 - - -- 075080 03/11/87 » * *rt »» 110.00 361.91 86.00 424.39 _ 306.60 1,288.30 » 536.60 41.35 290.39 868.34 » __COCA_COLA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 4 AMOUNT _ VENDOR CONCESSIONS ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV_N P.O. 8 MESSAGE BOTTLING INVENTORY _- 16.32 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLY 10-4504- 260 -26 - - - -- 16.32 - -- - - - CLANCY - -- - - DRUG INC GEN SUPPLY --- - - - - -- -- 10- 4504 - 260 -26 2.59 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLY - - -- - --------------- - - - -- 10- 4504 - 420 -42 29.04 CLANCY DRUG INC GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 510 -51 3.7S __ _CLANCY DRUG INC SHORT SUPPLY 10- 4508 - 120_ -12 � 33.52 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO SUPPLY 16- 0- 4508 - 200 -20 212.01 -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- - -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- - -- » *» -CKS •' 075080 03/11/87 075080 03/11/87 - - -- 075080 03/11/87 » * *rt »» 110.00 361.91 86.00 424.39 _ 306.60 1,288.30 » 536.60 41.35 290.39 868.34 » __COCA_COLA BOTTLING____CONCESSIONS_ COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY _COCA_COLA_BOTTLING INVENTORY COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY CONT -MINN CONT -MINN CONT =MINN GEN SUPPLY_ CLEAN SPLY CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 28- 4624 - 703 -70 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 -- 50- 4632- 862 -86 2774504- 663 -66 27 -4512- 663 -66 27 -4624- 663 -66 075092 03/10/87 81.78 C b S DIST INC COMMODITIES 23-4642- 613 -61 81.78 # 075099 075099 075106 - *** -CKS *** -CKS - - - ** »-CKS -- 03/10/87 - _ - — 39.50 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS _ 27- 4540- 664-66 03/10/87 43.90 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 25400 83.40 • e ' I — - - -- — ** »—CKS 03/11/87 100.00 DAHL—MR HILDING POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 42042_ - 100.00 * - - -- - - - - -- - - -- i' 075110 03/05/87 245.65 DAVIDSEN DIST INC 245.65 • 50- 4632- 842 -84 - 075114 -- -- 03/10/87 — 16.56 ld TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 16.56 » I_ 075125 — _03/11/87 240.00 075125 03/09/87 99.75 - 10 -4504- 301 -30 075125 03/11/87 202.80 i' DAVIDSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 * ** -CKS 'r DELEGARD TOOL CO - TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 49078 _-. -.- *** -CKS - 11: h, e MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 301 -30 16259_ MERIT SUPPLY GEN $PLY 10 -4504- 446 -44 16231 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 1618$ e 1987 k OF EDINA CHECK . STER 03 -16 -81 AGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE - AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT_N0.- LNV.._M- P..O,_ N_MESSAGE._- 075125 03/11/87 451.50 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 16245 07S125_. -.__ _03/09/87 _ -- _ -__- ___ .__ 70. 00 - - -- _MERIT SUPPLY - 10-4512- 440 -44. 16221 075125 03/11/87 35.40 MERIT SUPPLY CLEAN SPLY 10 -4512- 540 -54 16199 075125 03/11/87 492.50 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 16200 075125 _03/11/87 492.50 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 -- 440 -44 075125 03/11/87 84.40 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 16257 075125 03/11/87 84.40 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 16160 075125_ -_ _. _ 03 /11_/87629.52 MERIT_. SUPPLY .- ____-- ._-- NEW._EQUIP__ __ _10 -4902- 440 - 44_16254____.___- ______. 075125 03/09/87 388.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SPLY 28- 4512 - 702 -70 16252 075125 03/11/87 336.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 4544 - 802 -80 16161 075125 _ _ _03/11/87 -- _- _.___ -- 224.00 __- MERIT SUPPLY- - PAINT 40- 4544 - 802 -80. 1.6201 075125 03/11/87 224.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 4544 - 805-80 16258 075125 03/11/87 490.00 MERIT SUPPLY WATER SUPPLIES 40- 4622 - 812 -80 16135 075125 --_03/1- 1-/87 _ 490. 00 -_- _.MERIT SUPPLY_ 5,035.27 w 075128 03/10/87 59.20 DAIRY HOME CONCESSIONS 2S-4624- 703 -70 rrwsww www -CKS 075131 03/09/87 335.00 ASPLUND COFFEE CONCESSIONS 2B- 4624-703-70 08348 335.00 w 075132 03/09/87 76.00 PHYSIO CONTROL CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 A16308 075132 03/09/87 294.70 PHYSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SPLY 10 -4510- 440 -44 370.70 w wwwwww wrr -CKS 075134 03/09/87 36.75 CITY WIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIR 50- 4248 - 841 -84 36.75 r rrwwww wrw -CKS - ' 075143_-_---.03 /11_/87 _- - 13 -.3S ENRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS. _27 -4624- 663 -66 I" r j 075143 03/11/87 18.40 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 j 31.75 wwwwrw www -CKS i] _- 075162- 03/09/87 _ 321_66 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS - 27- 4540- 664 -66 62433 9:1 321.66 • - -- - -- -- - - - -- o i � rwwwsw + ++ -CKS (�'a 075194 03/11/87 147.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 74547 n-. 075194 - 03/1 1 /87 39_80 - GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-440-44 74662 ;1 075194 03/09/87 29.96 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 74244 " 075194 03/11/87 299.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS GEN SPLY 10- 4504- 440 -44 74595 515.76 r rrrwwr rrr -CKS �' < rr 1987 CITY OF EDINA AMOUNT_ CHECK NO. DATE I z 03 -16 -87 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 48._71 — GOPHERS SHOOTERS— 075202 03/10/87 48.71 + -__— — —_ 03%11/87 -- 9.127 075209 075206 03/05/87 075209 075206 03/05/87 I� 075206 03/05/87 - -- — 075206 03/05/87 504.90 075206 — 03/05/87 AMOUNT_ - - -- CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 03 -16 -87 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 48._71 — GOPHERS SHOOTERS— TARGETS 3 48.71 + -__— — —_ 03%11/87 -- 9.127 075209 �� 42.40 075209 03/11/87 10.92 I� — — - - -- 10.09 - -- — 03/11/87 _ +�+ -CKS In 504.90 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 ,. __178.80 _ _ G d_K SERVICES_ LAUNDRY 10- 4262— S60 -56 195.20 6 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 113.60 G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4512— S40 -54 210.50 _ G 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 40- 4262 - 801 -80 1,203.00 + - - - - -- —46.57 075209- 03/11/87 ^ 075209 03/1 1 /87 42.40- 075209 -__— — —_ 03%11/87 -- 9.127 075209 03/11/87 42.40 075209 03/11/87 10.92 075209 03/11/87 10.09 075209 03/11/87 2.00 075209 03/_11/87 19.15 -- 075209— - -- 03/11/87 — — — - -16.30 -- 075209 03/11/87 16.60 075209 — - 03/11/87 16.60 075209 03/11/87 -- -- -- - - 2.99 - - -- 075209 03/11/87 14.53 100.00 + 164.87 + +rt+rt ++ j - 075228- - - - -- ' I - ---------------------- +rtrtrt ++ 075244 03/11/87 075245 075245 + # + # ++ ^i 075249 3 075253 I5� •151 -. 03/09/87 03/05/87 03/11/87 03/11/87 253.96 253.96 + -- 115.76 HAYDEN MURPHY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 __— 80_.60 ROBERT B HILL _GEN SPLY GENUINE PARTS GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646 -64 027544 27- 4504 - 662 -66 GENUINE_PART3 139.40 + CREDIT_ _ -4540- 560 -56 '' GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS _10 10 -4540- 560 -56 _02779 024779 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 026457 10-4100-420-42 GENUINE-PARTS � __REPA_IR__PARTS 100.00 + 10- 4540 - 560 -66_- 024708 r GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -- __ 025347 —._.- _____-' GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 024800 GENUINE_PARTS �c^ REPAIR PARTS 10— 560 - 56_031493_ 10 -4248- 560 -56 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS _4540- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 026718 h_' GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 072669 GENUINE PARTS _ _REPAIR PARTS _10- 4540 - 560 -56 GENUINE PARTS TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 _027562_ 026711 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10-4620 - 560 -56 024905 +++ —CKS • HILLSTROM AUTO SUP Y REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 — -- — — ++ +—CKS 50 -- 115.76 HAYDEN MURPHY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 __— 80_.60 ROBERT B HILL _GEN SPLY 10—_450_4- 446-44 58.80 ROBERT B HILL GEN SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 139.40 + '' + ++ —CKS - -" _— 100.00 WILLIAM HOFFMAN POLICE SERVICE 10-4100-420-42 e3 \ Icy 100.00 + G:1 � �c^ 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 26.50 + h_' +++ —CKS 1987 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 03- 16 -8', . -AGE CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N E6$AGE ' 075277 __... 03/09/87 — 610.00 PRINTING BIKE6—iFEEE�TY 1_�.2P 49- 00_Q =OQ- 3_7.82_ 4 �_._ .."_ 1 610. 00 i - -- -- - ii -CKS 110.34 - - - -- 9I iii -CKS " 075289 03/11/87 10.00- WALTER JOHNSON CORRECTION 10- 4100 - 420 -42 __— 075289 03/11/87 10,_00 WALTER JOHNSON POL -ICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 =42 10- 4504- 646 -64 075289 03/11/87 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 420 -42 I:cl 100.00 i ii -CKS iii -CKS I" ° 075300 03/10/87 249_90 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 158.92 I:cl �� 34 249.90 i iii -CKS 171 " 30 075317 03/10/87 1,000.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 S6 -- 075317 03/11/87 80.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 !„ -- ±�!- CKS - - - -, �I 07S302 03/11/87 3,544.35 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 075302 03/10/87 3,463.00 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -64 7,007.35 • - -- — :,---- rii * *� --- ---- - - - ---- - -- -- tai -CKS -_ _. 075304 03/05/87 61.98 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646-64 494364 I] _ 075304 03/10/8_7 38.05 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10-4604- 646 - 64_494522 1- 075304 03/10/87 63.90 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604 - 646 -64 494536 075304 03/10/87 50.73 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10 -4604- 646-64 494531 __075304 -- 03/1 -0/97 13_50 —KNOX LUM @ER. CO LUMBER 1,0 =4 4604_646_64 464418, " 075304 03/10/87 43.21 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10-4604- 646 -64 494453 ____• 075304 03/05/87 39.16 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 519645 _0753_0_4 03_/_09/87 19.91 KNOX LUMBER CO PAINT 27 =4 4544 - 662 -66 494483 075304 03/05/87 18.91 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 494501 _ ^" 075304 03/10/87 29.45 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SPLY 28- 4504 - 702 -70 494551 S1'. _ 378.80 i ii « -CKS „. 075311 03/10/87 1,661.55 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 075311 03/10/87 2,535.00 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 ; 075311 03/10/87 3,468.30 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 7,864.85 i 'O 075315 03/10/87 158.92 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER SUPPLY 10- 4514- 520 -52 I4� "_ 158.92 �� 34 •iii *� iii -CKS 171 " 30 075317 03/10/87 1,000.45 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 S6 -- 075317 03/11/87 80.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 !„ 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. Y MESSAGE 1,081.33 t -- t• 075318 03/11/87 97.80 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 440 -44 075318 03/11/87 11.55 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY 27 -4262- 664 -66 109.35 t i sssart str -CKS 075325 03/11/87 80.67 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 075325 03/11/87 20.67 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 101.34 sssrtrts rtst -CKS - - 075329 03/05/87 - - -- - -- 950.00 ----- - -- LAYNE MINNESOTA CO - - - - -- CONT REPAIRS -- - - - -- 40- 4e48- 801 -80 - - lseee -- - - - - -- -' 075329 03/05/87 4,790.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 15265 5,740.00 t ssssss tst -CKS 075337 03/11/87 1e.88 LAKE STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P158es "i 075337 03/11/87 21.68 LAKE'STATE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 560-56 P155E0 srtssrtrt sst -CKS 075343 03/11 /8— - - - -- 47.3 4 - - - - - -- - M- I- N N E S OT- A - - -- G LO- VE GE- N SUP- P-- L I E S 1- 0 --45- 0-- 4 - --3-01- - 3 0 - -- - - - 11020 -- - - -- - -- ' ' 075343 03/11/87 38.64 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1144 85.98 • 075344 03/11/87 71.00 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 449-44 , 0T5344__ 03/09/87 _ — 50.00 MED OXYGEN _6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10-4274- 449_44 075344 03/11/87 3.92 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10-4274- 449 -44 075344 03/09/87 45.41 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP 1ST AID SPLY 10 -4510- 440 -44 170.33 +' i tttttrt ttt -CKS ' 675346 — - - — 03/10/87 — -- - - -- 217,752.34 - -- - - — - MET N WASTE C L COMM _w - - -- - -- SEER SERVICE -1 — — - - 0- 4312-812 -80 - -- -- -- - - - - -- s 075346 03/10/87 217,752.34 MET N WASTE C L COMM SEWER SERVICE 10 -4612- 812 -80 " 075346 - -- 03/10/87 E17,752.34- MET N WASTE C L COMM CORRECTION 10- 4612 - 818 -80 217,752.34 - ' - - - -- _ - -- - -- . —_. — _ - -. -- — ._ _ - -_— -- - - - -- - -- _ t t t_- C K_ S .,i 075358 03/11/87 1,915.00 NATL GUARDIAN SYST MISC EQUIP 27- 1388 - 000 -00 - 075358 — — - 03/11/87 — 561.20 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 27- 4304 - 668 -66 2,476.20 t -- — j 075359_ — __03/09/87_— 631 .50 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4 45_4_0- 5_6_0- 075359 03/09/87 e,444.65 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS _56___ 10- 4540 - 560 -56 — 075359 03/11/87 95.33 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS E7- 4540- 664 -66 646388 3,171.48 + I d�7o� l-• srtsrtts rtes -CKS „I• �L-- ly —� 1987 L OF EDINA CHECK , .STER 03 -16 -87 .AGE 9 _ -_ 075363 03/09/87 075363 03/09/87 075363 03/09/87 «« « « «« 10,90 MONARCH _MARKING_ -- OFFICE -_SPLY 50- 451.6. - 820 - 82_785206 21.75 MONARCH MARKING OFFICE SPLY 50 -4516- 840 -84 785208 28.80 MONARCH MARKING OFFICE SPLY SO- 4516 - 860 -86 785207 075365 03/11/87 100.00 BURT MERFELD POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 s SSAGE___ ++ +—CKS «RS —CKS d, __075380 03/10/87 16,331.90 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10-4201- 220 -22 16,331.90 R - - - -- 14a _ -i sRS «s« « «« — ���.. _ CKS_ ' 075402 03/09/87 30.00 NOTT COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449-44 205351 30.00 + sss «s« 34, « «« —CKS 33'. 075406 03/10 1 52.14 NTCC INC 52.14 R REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 540 -54 i3 075366 03/10/87 MINNESOTA BAR ss« -CKS 6] 075412 03/09/87 170.95 INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 41.S8 + 075366 03/10/87 154.74 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 !!�R_CK3 075366 03/10/87 _ —_ 125_90 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 5-0- 463e=A62 =86 " 13.50 R 72 '. 5 '0 075421 03/11/87 451.59 R 73 10 -4580- 646 -64 1091 --- -_ - - -- �„. 7 — 19I 075370 03/10/87 99.65 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 28- 4624 - 703 -70 075370 03/05/87 253_83 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONCESSIONS 28- 464_7A3�0— J..950_4 —_ 353.48 + "3 =1� 075378 03/10/87 3,349.70 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50-4630- 822 -82 Z' 075378_ 03/05/87 — _S,406_45 MARK VII SALES. INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 842 -84 075378 03/10/87 5,497.90 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 14,254.OS « j «RS —CKS d, __075380 03/10/87 16,331.90 THOMSEN NYBECK SERVICES 10-4201- 220 -22 16,331.90 R - - - -- 14a _ -i sRS «s« « «« — ���.. _ CKS_ ' 075402 03/09/87 30.00 NOTT COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449-44 205351 30.00 + sss «s« 34, « «« —CKS 33'. 075406 03/10 1 52.14 NTCC INC 52.14 R REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 540 -54 i3 ss« -CKS 6] 075412 03/09/87 41.58 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM 23 -4642- 613 -61 132851 ° 41.S8 + 6- I !cc ,a,l I3, RR « «RR !!�R_CK3 075420 03/11/87 13.50 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 34 13.50 R 72 '. 5 '0 075421 03/11/87 42.87 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE TOOLS 73 10 -4580- 646 -64 1091 --- -_ - - -- �„. 7 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV N_P.O. # MESSAGE — 28.32_ ' QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARS 10-4540- 560 -56 14827 , ,zl 075421 03/09/87 161.70 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE GEN SPLY 27- 4504 - 664 -66 68595 , 'I 075421 03/09_/87 34.25 OLSON CHAIN _& CABLE GEN SUPPLY 27- 4504- 664 -66 1085 a -- -fit *. -CKS__ :. 6 2 i +ww + + + —_ I' —_— - - -_ - -- —_ -- 10- 4540 - 560-56 * ** -CKS 9- -.• - - - - - -- �' 075429 03/11/87 35.70 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 075429 03/10/87 112.10 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 075429 03/10/87 271.25 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 ' 075429 03/10/87 52.50 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 :. 075460 03/10/87 471.55 * ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -64 •71 075445 03/09/87 075445 03/09/87 •I 89.60 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 704 -70 11239 89.60 + 1,393.46 _ PAPER CA_LMENSON__ &_CO PARTS 820.76 PAPER CALMENSON & CO PARTS 2,214.22 * ' i0-4620-S60-S6 10- 4620-560 -56 370053 *00–CKS * ** -CKS 075446 03/09/87 1,486.25 PIONEER RIM —& WHEEL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 1,486.25 * ** -CKS .] 075448 03/05/87 219.10 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10-4600- 628 -62 02979 075448 03/09/87 39.55 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600 - 611 -61 02986 ' 258.65 * ** –CKS – 075452 — - -- - -- 03/11/87 -- -- — 28.32_ ' QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARS 10-4540- 560 -56 14827 , _ 28.32 + – - - -- --- - - - - -- - – -- , * + + +w+ -- -fit *. -CKS__ :. 075455 03/11/87 88.72 RITEWAY REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560-56 58872 -.• - - - - - -- 88.72 +— I.- *ww + *+ * ** -CKS I�: 075460 03/11/87 57.25 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 - 075460 03/10/87 89.30 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -64 075460 -- - 03/11/87 - -- 191_.20 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 50- 4632-862 -B6 337.75 r — -- - -- - - -- o 075462 03/11/87 25.00 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6742 +I 075462 03/11/87 47.86 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES TOOLS 10- 4580 - 644 -64 6792 72.86 I7'6�• 1987 G_ . OF EDINA CHECK h— _lSTER 03 -16 -87 :ASE 11 MESSAGE 075471 03/10/87 174_135 KENNETH E ROSLAND 174.85 7 I5 075485 03/10/87 2,137.81 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 075495__— 03/10/87 _ _77._00 STATE BLDG INSP DAM C_HAB_C� T..A 1_0= 3_113_ _Q0 =0.0 ____ — 2,214.81 + 075490 03/05/87 82.79 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64 82.79 * * * * ** is 075493 03/10/87 1,995.30 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 075493 03/10/87 51106.50 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 ., 7.101.80 + 'I **+ —CKS * ** —CKS 075500 0 03/11/87 1 100.00 H HAROLD SWANSON P POLICE SERVICE 1 10- 4100-420-42 100.00 ** *—CKS 075503 0 03/10/87 3 37.67 S SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540 - 646 -64 37.67 075505 0 03/11/87 3 32.16 S SUN A ADVERTISING 1 10 -4210- 140 -14 07550_5_ 0 03/09/87 1 154.36 S SUN A ADVERTISING 1 10 -4210- 140 -1 -4 075505 0 03/10/87 2 28.84 S SUN A ADVERTISING 5 50-4214- 820 -82 075505 0 03/10/87 3 33.83 S SUN A ADVERTISING 5 50 -4214- 840 -84 075505 0 03/10/87 3 33.83 S SUN A ADVERTISING 5 50- 4214 - 860 -86 — -- 2 283.02 + 5d' * *t -CKS 5 35 i57. 075508 0 03/05/87 7 7.25 S ST PAUL BOOK G GEN SUPPLY 1 10- 4504 - 133 -12 :so 11.94 * " 7I G3 �l + + + + ++ ** +_CKS 8- 3Of 075511 03/05/87 184.95 SOUTHERN VACUUM SERV SERVICES 50-4236- 841 -84 2423 6^ sl 184.95 + e 32 G r 7e S3 075512 03/11/87 106.67 S T ROBS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 42880 71 id 106.67 * 7; 55 7.! 71 so yyyyyy * ** —CKS ''— 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 12 AMOUNT CHECK NO. DATE �z 286.92 r �i 075516 03/09/87 3 M CO 675516 63%09/67- 41 075516 03/09/87 5 075516 03/09/87 - - 07551 6_ - -- _ 03/09/87 n� 075516 03/09/87 192494 457.20 230.54 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS - - 075525 G 99.e3 075525 03/11/87 TOOLS 075S2503/11/87 TRACY OIL -- - - -- 075525 - -- 03/11/87 _ ROEBUCK 075525 03/11/87 192494 075525 03/11/87 SEARS 075526 03/10/87 '� rrttrr 8,634.10 643.33 r 075541 03/05/87 075542 03/10/87 CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 12 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 286.92 r 3 M CO GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 325 -30 —_ _160.14 — SEARS — ROEBUCK — TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 - 80_101039 —_— I+I -.15 153.42 � SEARS ROEBUCK CORRECTION 40 -4580- 801 -80 192494 457.20 230.54 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 101040 G 99.e3 TOOLS 40- 4S_80- 801 - 80_101038 TRACY OIL -- - n _ 153.42 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40 -4580- 801 -80 192494 TARGET 153.42 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 192494 8,634.10 643.33 r INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 286.92 TURNOUIST PAPER CO GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 520 -52 286.92 r 3 M CO GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 325 -30 167.05 107.10 3 M CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 _ 162.50_ 3_M CO SIGNS &POST _ 10 -4542- 325 -_30_ 394.00 3 M CO SIGNS & POST 10- 4542 - 325 -30 457.20 3 M CO GEN SUPPLY 10 -4542- 325 -30 - - - -- 98.00 3 M CO -- --- - - - --- SIGNS & POST -- 10- 4542- 325 -30 - -- ---- - - - - -- 1 , 385.85 *— 5,160.35 TRACY OIL -- - GASOL.'INE 10 -4612- 560 -56 44280 - -- - - 5,160.35 r 203.40 TARGET AMM.UNITION 29- 4572 - 722 -72 203.40 + _ -- _ _ 8,634.10 THORPE DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 + #+ -CKS " ` 8,634.10 + + # #t ## ++ +-CKS 075569 03/10/87 - 403.93 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL GASOLINE 28- 4612 - 704 -70 403.93 r � #�trt* - --- -------- - - - - -- -- - -- - -- --- - - -- ++ +-CKS —' -' 075575 I ;i 075586 03/11/87 38.45 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 810 -80 031414 - - - -- 38.45 r - - - -- - 03/09/87 07559 0 -- 03/11/ i„ 11/ 13 14.23 W W GRAINGER r CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 703 -70 100.00 HENRY WROBLESKI POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 420 -42 100.00 r 73.92 + A MILEAGE 10 -4208- 140 -14 + ++ -CKS I, 17- ,_ Ii,q 1987 OF EDINA CHECK .STER 03 -16-8? eAGE 13 I'_- --- * * *b ** _ - --- ---------- -- - - -- -bt+ —CKS __. 1^ 3 075616 03/05/87 465.62 MILLPORE CORPORATION GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 482 -48 15672 17 e 465.62 + : 7 - - -- -- bbbbbb bbb -CKS 075702 03/05/87 25.00 PLUNKETTS INC GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- 702 -70 334350 25.00 + 075703 03/05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT 50- 4216 - 820 -82 075703 03/05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT 50- 4216 - 840 -84 _075703 — _-- 03 /05/87 250.00 KMG MAIN HURDMANN AUDIT SQ= g2l6_8Si0_66 750.00 b 075704 03/05/87 114.00 DON ENDER UNIFORM ALLOW 1Q42�i6= 420 =42 114.00 * — ro "i -- 075705 — 03/05_/87 39_99_ _WM J WALSH UNIFORM ALLOW 10= 4266 = 420 =42_- 39.99 • - - -- -- - 075706 03/05/87 75_00 LOLA EDMAN SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 9165 - -- 75.00 * - - - - - -- - -- ?. _075707 _03/05/87 50_00 MGA INC DUES 27 -4204- 661 -66 50.00 • --- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - -- _. - 075708 - _ 03/05/87 38_18 C E GROTH MUSIC CO MUSIC SUPLY 10- 4596 - 627 -62 - - - -- 38.16 • - 075709_ 03/05/87 210_00 JERRYS LANDSCAPR CONT REPAIRS 50 -4248- 841 -84 49114 -- - -- 210.00 * - ------ - - -- -- i 075710 03/05/87 'I, 07s594 03/05/87 075711 ,I 03/05/87 'i 075712 :al 03/09/87 S 075713 '7, 03/09/87 SINS RESTAURANTS 12.00 b 3,483_.33 STOREFRONT /YDUTH ACTION SERVICES 10 -4201- 504 -50— 402.00 NATL OFFICE INTERIOR FURNITURE 10 -4901- 420 -42 B69301 3,885.33 b 389.37 WESCO 389.37 • 1,011.50 GREENHAVEN PRINTING 1,011.50 b 075714 03/09/87 195.00 GUSTAF JOHNSON 195.00 + 075715 03/09/87 42.98 DANIEL KELLEY 42.98 CONT REPAIRS GEN SPLY AMBULANCE REFUND REFULND 28 -4M48- 702-70 333714 10- 4504 - 560 -56 12665 10 -3180- 000 -00 40 -1130- 000 -00 075716 03/09/87 273.00 EDINA POLICE DEPT CAR WASHES 10 -4296- 560 -56 273.00 b 3. 3'. I3[ 5f 7 'a G7 6r 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 14 075721 075722 03/09/87 03/09/87 075723 03/09/87 ^I 075724 03/09/87 52.90 _ PHYSICIANS DESK PDR DRUGS 10 -4510- 440 -44 52.90 s - -- - - - - - - -- �, 12.00 JIMMY JINGLE INC REFUND 10- 3045 - 000 -00 12.0 0 • - - - - - - - -' 95.46 _ ROAD RESCUE 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 020208- 95.46 -s - - - -- 168.63-------0 M SCOTT 6 SONS CO FERTILIER 27 -4558- 664 -66 51996 168.63 • - -- - - -- - - - -- -- 075785 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. N MESSAGE 188.60 s �i 075717 - - - - 1 - 03/09/87 - - -- - 86.00_ -8 MARSHALL 6 SWIFT GEN SPLY 10- 4504 - 200 -20 S CONCESSIONS - 28-4624- 703-70 -- -- 6. r 5 _- 075718 _ - -'- - - -- 03/09/87 -- -- 20._00 IAAO - -- DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 672115 I s 075727 03/09/87 _ _ 20.00 s - CONCESSIONS -- - n - 075719 - -- - - - -- 03/09/87 - - -- - - -- 15.00 _ _ -- -15.0 CHIEF FIRE E_ XECUTIVE SUBSCRIPTION 10- 4204 - 440 -44 CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 0 • - - 075720 - -- - -- 03/09/87 - - - -- 42.45_ N F P A --- 10 -4502- 440 -44 075728 03/09/87 - 15.00 42.45 r -BOOK - -- 075721 075722 03/09/87 03/09/87 075723 03/09/87 ^I 075724 03/09/87 52.90 _ PHYSICIANS DESK PDR DRUGS 10 -4510- 440 -44 52.90 s - -- - - - - - - -- �, 12.00 JIMMY JINGLE INC REFUND 10- 3045 - 000 -00 12.0 0 • - - - - - - - -' 95.46 _ ROAD RESCUE 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 020208- 95.46 -s - - - -- 168.63-------0 M SCOTT 6 SONS CO FERTILIER 27 -4558- 664 -66 51996 168.63 • - -- - - -- - - - -- -- 075785 03/09/87 - - -- 188.60,- COURSIGN INC, - REPAIR PARTS 27-4S40-666-66 7064_ 188.60 s ---- - - - -�: - 075726 - -- - _ - 03/09/87 - -- - -- - 24_.74 DAIRY HOME INC -s CONCESSIONS - 28-4624- 703-70 -- -- - - r 24.74 ----- - - -- - -- - .., 075727 03/09/87 _ _ _ 14.32 - - AM BAKERIES CO CONCESSIONS _28- 4624 - 703_70 075727 03/10/87 6.27 AM BAKERIES CO CONCESSIONS 28 -4624- 704 -70 075728 03/09/87 - 15.00 VENDMARK INC 10-3056- 000 -00 REFUND 15.00 M ,r 075729 03/09/87 145.00 QUALITY REFRIG INC 100378 CONT REPAIRS 27- 4248- 662 -66 "j 145.00 s I: t3 "'075730 03/09%87 82.00 CLARENCE HARPENS SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 "I 82.00 - 075731 03/09/87 R G ROBERTSON MEETING EXPENSES 27.10 10- 4206-430 -42 I' 17 I 27.10 s Inr .1� 075732 03/09/87 RADIO SHACK EQUIP NEW 10- 4902-420-42 375107 43.93 �10 s, 43.93 • °2 075733 03/09/87 84.00 DAYLE LOCK SUPPLY GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 18030 - 1 -3 Asa 84.00 • -- ` 17, 07S734 03/10/87 64.90 MOORE BUSINESS CTR GEN SUPPLYU 10- 4504 - 510 -51 j74 5 - 075734 03/09/87 317.50 MOORE BUSINESS CTR OFFICE EQUIP 25- 4906 - 510 -51 7 1987 I CHECK OF EDINA NO. DATE (2 075734 075734 03/10/87 03/09/87 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING CHECK 1STER 03- 16 -8's PAGE 15 UNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION "hCCOVJILNO-LNK--M--P-O-�-I- MESSAGE -, 260.00 MOORE BUSINESS CTR OFFICE FURNITURE 25- 4906 - 510 -51 4,410_00 BUSINESS CTR OFFI_CE EQUIP 5, 052.40 • `I 075735 03/09/87 3,921_00 E H RENNER J6 SONS CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248-801 =84 3,921.00 + gI 07573603/09/87 540."00 BMS OFFICE - SALE$, GEN- SUPPLY - 1.0 =4504- 510 -51. ° 075736 03/10/87 395.00 BMS OFFICE SALES OFFICE EQUIP 10- 4901 - 160 -16 935.00 + c "i 075737 03/10/87 562.00 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING 10- 4504 - 133 -12 � 075737 03/10/87 1,600.00 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING 10- 4600 - 62 7 7 -62 "5, 075737 03/10/87 CHIPPEWA - GRAPHICS PRINTING 23-4600.-6 075737 03/10/87 562.00 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING 26- 4600- 681 -68 " 075737 03/10/87 602.00 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING 27- 4600-661 -66 ° 075737 03/10/87 562.00 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS PRINTING 28- 4600_701 -70 "I 4,450.00 s _ 075738 03/1.0/87 170_78 -78--CELLULAR 10_ 04 -140 170.78 • ,I I- �0 - 75739 03/1.0/87 86_50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50 -_ 4632- 822 -82 075739 03/10/87 133.00 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 7 075739 03/10/87 180.00 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 -- - -- -- 399_50 • __ 075740 03/10/87 145.06 LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES 10 -4201- 140 -14 075.740 03/10/87 237_39 LABOR RELATIONS SERVICES 10-4201 - 140 -14 382.44 M - - - 075741 03/10/87 415_00 HENN CTY TREAS RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 353- 30 -L2845 415.0 0 * - - - - - -- _ 075742 03/10/87 12.00 MN STATE NORTICUL SUBSCRIPTION 10 -4204- 600-60 ar A; 12.00 ° 075743 - -- 03/10/87 10.00 MN SOCIETY OF MEM @ERSHIP 10 -4204- 800 -60 31 Is: 1 0 . 0 0 } - - -„ 075744 03/10/87 50_00 THE LOTUS 11 REFUND tt -3155- 000 -00 sa ss `- sn' 50.00 + "I 075745 03/10/87 30.00 SERVICE AM CORP REFUND 10- 3050 - 000 -00 .I 3 0 . 0 0 • - - - - -- - =I 075746 03/10/87 495.28 MPLS WELDER SUPPLY SERVICES 23 -4201- 611 -61 j 495.28 • Ic; i -I -- 075747 03/10/87 126.02 STEBGO METALS INC SERVICSE3 23 -4201- 611 -61 b,k i;`I 126.02 075748 03/10/87 90.00 MOLLIE PAULSON INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 70 '. 7,� 90.00 s ;; 74 075749 03/10/87 210.00 J THOMAS NELSON SERVICES ___ - 23- 4201 - 611 -61 751. 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 16 5 075765 03/10/87 19.32 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10 -4290- 140 -14 z CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE (= 210.00 + QI 075750 03/10/87 50.96 NATL CAMERA EXCHANGE PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 15050 5 50.96 + 075751 03/107 /8 438.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC IN C CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 9700 - 13j 075751 03/10/87 35.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC INC CONT REPAIRS 29- 4248 - 722 -72 9698 9' 473.00 • 075752 03/10/67 25.00 D C HEY GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 133 -12 029552 =' 25.00 + 075753 03/10/87 48.00 CAREER TRACK SEMINAR 10 -4202- 440 -44 48.00 + 117 075754 03/10/87 44.00 FARM CHEMICALS HANDBOOK 10 -4502- 440 -44 B' 075490 03/10/87 15.58 SHERWIN WILLIAMS - PAINT 10-4544- 646 -64 075816 03/10/87 457.60 BROOKSIDE CRT CONDO REFUND 40- 1130 - 000 -00 ]LI 075755 03/10/87 500.00 LAKELAND FLORIST CONT SERV 10- 4200 - 180 -18 500.00 • 075756 03/10/87 4,820.00 BRUNSON INST COMP MACHINES 10- 4901 - 260 -26 075756 03/10/87 2,675.00 BRUNSON INST COMP MACHINES 10- 4901 - 260 -26 7,495.00 + 075757 03/10/87 400.00 MARTIN MCALLISTER PERSONEL 10 -4212- 510 -51 075757 03/10/87 600.00 MARTIN MCALLISTER PERSONEL 10- 4212 - 510 -51 075758 03/10/87 2,148.07 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE TV - 10 -2148- 000 -00 - - - --- --- -- - -- - -- --- - - - - -- -- 2,148.07 + - - - - 075759 -- ---- - 03/10/87 - - - -- - -- 259.40 TIERNEY BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 87803 "! 259.40 + - - -- 075760 03/10/87 125.00 MN SAFETY COUNCIL - -- - -- PERSONEL -- - 10- 4212 - 510 -51 ----- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- -- 125.0 0 + .:^ - - --- 075761 - - -- - - --- 03/10/87 - - 71.00 DEPARTMENT OF TREES 10- 4560 - 644-64 ' 71.00 • _ - 14 075762 - -- 03/10/87 _39.00_ WORKING SMART PERSONEL 10 -4212- 510 -51 `'_ 075763 03/10/87 849.76 REGION VI PERCENTAGE PLAYOFFS 28- 3480 - 000 -00 I� 849.76 • - -- !-ol IS1I _ 07S764 - - - -- 03/10/87 10_5.0_0 EDIN,6 POLICE DEPT MEETING EXP 10 -4206- 430 -42 - (51 - - - - - 105.00 • • 5 075765 03/10/87 19.32 HENN CTY DEPT OF POSTAGE 10 -4290- 140 -14 z • 1987 OF EDINA K NO. I CHECK ASTER 03 -16-8. :AGE 17 M-P O-.�-#- MESSAGE -_ -- 1' ._ 075766 -� 03/10/87 21.00 U I ED WA ►�L- -- �MPLS _- 1 -�lNCH 1.0= 4E0.6.- 14.0 -.14 _--- ---- - - - - - - - -- 21.00 68_0 0 • - -- ----- - - - -- 075767 03/10/87 85.26 TC HOME JUI -CE INVENTORY 50_4632- 842 -84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 075767 03/10/87 41.04 TC HOME JUICE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 ° 126.30 + (( 075771 03/10/87 = " 075768 075768 03/10/87 03/10/67 32,224.50 R an METRO WASTE CONTROL METRO UASTE GONT -ROL 10- 3095- 000 -00 10-3093-000 00 BLDG PERMITS 50_00_ • .,PP4 -6186 PERMITS "I 075769 03/10/87 58.00 PHYLLIS GROSSMAN SKI REFUND 10 -2240- 000 -00 - - - -- -- 68_0 0 • 7 075770 03/10/87 64.55 MURRAY SANDLER OFFICE SUPPLIES 28- 4516- 701 -70 64.55 • (( 075771 03/10/87 50.00 GREATER MPLS AREA GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 200 -20 - - -- -- 50_00_ • _ _ 075772 03/10/87 45.00 HARRIETTE BACH SUBSCRIPTION 23- 4204 - 611 -61 075773 03/10/87 28.00 BARBARA LUNDGREN ART WORK 23 -3625- 000 -00 - - - -- - -- 28.00 • - 075774 03/10/87 105.00 - - VIRGINIA LEFEVERE ART WORK 23 -3625- 000 -00 105.00* 075775 03/10/87 133.52 KAY SHARKEY ART WORK 23 -3625- 000 -00 133.52 r 075776 03/10/87 36.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY SERVICES 23- 4120 - 612 -61 4` 36.00 + i 075777 03/10/87 111.67 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK 23 -3625- 000 -00 _.- 075777 03/10/87 49.78 MOLLIE PAULSON- SERV,ICES-_ -23- 4120 - 613 -61 075777 03/10/87 49.78- MOLLIE PAULSON CORRECTION 23- 4120 - 613 -61 ' 075777 03/10/87 49.48 MOLLIE PAULSON SERVICES 23 -4120- 613 -61 `1 161.15 • 075778 03/10/87 48.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA INSTRUCTOR 23-4201- 611 -61 (" 075778 03/10/87 84_00 PHYLLIS HAYWA INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 °I 075778 03/10/87 19.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 611 -61 151 .00 + 6] " 075779 03/10/87 86.26 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS PAYMENT 10- 4901 - 420 -42 66.26 + Cl fig, 075780 03/10/87 19.75 NTOA TEXTBOOK 10- 4502 - 420 -42 yA' 19.75 + '° ITA 7, 771 z3 075781 03/10/87 1,502.94 STRGAR ROSCOE SERVICSES 10- 4201 - 260 -26 1,502.94 + �79I\ 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 18 075790 075792 075793 075794 `71 075795 -ol 075796 �5' 1,, I- 075797 „ 075798 03/11/87 81.85 MAYO DST INVENTORY 50- 630 - 822 -82 - -- -- - - I 4 81.85 - - - --- - - - - -- - -- ++ + -CKS 03/11/87 15.00 LEAANN VITO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449 -44 15.00 + 03/11/87 91.00 CUTOM CAMERA CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 115662 91.00 + 03/11/87 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.0_M- MESSAGE 3 075782 03/10/87 164,038.50 - HARRIS TRUST d DUE_HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 568.25 + 164,038.50 + 188.51 KARTUEMS SALES F 27- 4540- 666 -66 075783_ 03/10/87 3.1S _ BRADY OFFICEWARE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 31.96 075783 03/10/87 9.95 BRADY OFFICEWARE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 075783 03/10/87 5.92 BRADY OFFICEWARE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 075783 03/10/87 6.00 BRADY OFFICEWARE GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 075784 03/10/87 7.0_0 NE METRO TECH TUITION 10- 4202 - 420 -42 - - -- - -- ., --- --- 7.00 + . 075785 03/10/87 1.24 LYNDALE_HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 9555 "I 075785 03/10/87 33.56 LYNDALE HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 72340 - 34.80 + 075786 03/10/87 15.00 STATE TREASURER CERTIFICATION 40- 4310- 809 -60 _.I 15.00 « 1 075787 03/10/87 1,750.00 SUBURBAN RATE SERVICES 10- 4801 - 509 -50 1,750.00 • 075788 03/11/87 387.00 ERIC ANDERSON 10- 4200-500 -50 CONT SERV 075788 03/11/87 47.25 ERIC ANDERSON MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 500-50 434.25 + 075789 03/11/87 19.95 PIP PRINTING GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504- 133 -12 075789 03/11/87 - - -- 64.30 PIP PRINTING -+ GEN SUPPLY 10 -4504- 133 -12 - - - -- - - -- - - -- - -- -- - -- - - -- 84.25 075790 075792 075793 075794 `71 075795 -ol 075796 �5' 1,, I- 075797 „ 075798 03/11/87 81.85 MAYO DST INVENTORY 50- 630 - 822 -82 - -- -- - - I 4 81.85 - - - --- - - - - -- - -- ++ + -CKS 03/11/87 15.00 LEAANN VITO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 449 -44 15.00 + 03/11/87 91.00 CUTOM CAMERA CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 440 -44 115662 91.00 + 03/11/87 59.99 TARGET GEN SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 59.99 - . - -_ - 03/11/87 568.25 WINFIELD DEVELOPMENT LEASE - 10- 4201 - 627 -62 568.25 + 03/11/87 188.51 KARTUEMS SALES REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 666 -66 188.51 + 03/11/87 31.96 TOWN d COUNTRY DODGE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P2761 31 -96 + 03/11/87 26.07 GARLANDS INC GEN SPLY f� c Ir 10 -4504- 646 -64 2311 - - -- `7--' 3 s e to 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 075799 03/11/87 CHECK ISTER 26.07 + 71.70 ED MCDEVITT CO REPAIR PARTS 71.70 + 10- 4540 - 560 -56 ur:)nuu u -s/ llidr 32.27 AAA FORM COMPANY REPIAR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 32.27 + 03-16 -8. PAGE 19 MESSAGE 75813 03/11/87 19.50 ADVANCE PAGING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 ° 19.50 + : °� �67 91 � s= 075814 03/11/87 1,266.00 MN BUSINESS TEL SYS TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 6460 '3 ° 1 , 266.00 + 7O 7, 7.' 075815 03/11/87 374.00 FRAN HOFFMAN REFUND 10- 4202 - 240 -24 731 L17 374.00 + h7411 __l7 075801 03/11/87 20.18 BLOOMINGTON DODGE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -S6 62243 z 20.18 + 075802 03/11/87 33.30 EMR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 089842 ° 33.30 + 075803 03/11/87 5.00 MUNICI PALS DUES 10 -4206- 500 -50 - 7 ,o 5.00 + .�I 075804 03/11/87 42.15 GARNER HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 877 y - 42.15 + 075805 03/11/87 2,181.50- FRED G ANDERSON CORRECTION 10- 4540 - 520 -52 '3 075805 03/11/87 2,181.50 FRED G ANDERSON REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 075805 03/11/87 281_50 FRED G ANDERSON REPAIR PARTS 10= 450 =5252 281.50 + =_ 07.580 -6_ _ 03/11/87 495.34._ GO�H2R SIGN CO SIGN66�Q,RT3 10-4542 - 325 -0 8 -68 -L17 -- - - -- 495.34 r °_ 075807 - - - -^ 03/11/87 85_00 AUTO P 6 L INC CONT REPAIRS 10 --4--S60- 6 $$125_ ' 85.00 + -, 0_75808 03/11/87 235.55 DRESSER CONSTRUCTION REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540= _S60_56�59�4 - ' 235.55 + -- �I 0_75809 03/11/87 52.40 DIAMOND VOGEL JPAINT TOOLS 10- 4580 - 301 -30 06713 3 52.40 + 075810 03/11/87 355_11 JIM HATCH SALES_ GEN SUPPLY 10 =4 4504 - 301 =30 6841 " 075810 03/11/87 421.20 JIM HATCH SALES TOOLS 10-4580- 301 -30 6840 ' " 776.31 + 5. i 075811 03/11/87 51.13 DIRECT SAFETY CO GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 480 -48 205236 ' 51.13 a sl 075812 03/11/87 136.00 WUNDER KLEIN DONOHUE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 44851 °� 9I 136.00 + IG, 75813 03/11/87 19.50 ADVANCE PAGING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 ° 19.50 + : °� �67 91 � s= 075814 03/11/87 1,266.00 MN BUSINESS TEL SYS TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 6460 '3 ° 1 , 266.00 + 7O 7, 7.' 075815 03/11/87 374.00 FRAN HOFFMAN REFUND 10- 4202 - 240 -24 731 L17 374.00 + h7411 __l7 1987 CITY OF EDINA 3 CHECK REGISTER 03 -16 -87 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV M P 0. A MESSAGE. — 1 �e7 SL` 13� i � •114.41 i7 490,248.82 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND I 2,410.56 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 4,- 987.50 FUND _25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 17C 7 562.00 FUND 26 TOTAL —_ SWIMMING POOL FUND _ 7J " 8,671.34 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 4,295.66 FUND - 28–TOTAL RECREATION- CENTER FUND 287.11 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 13,353.56 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 54,657.60 - -- FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND Computer chesks_s�_6625_thru _ 76858 1- 579,474.15 TOTAL - -- -- --- - -- --- - -- - ------- FIfiT IJ L— 0 ' . 3 s" in. — I �e7 SL` 13� 5, 1: Gf 17C 71 31 7J TalIl �7y 0 ' . . I 1987 C. OF EDINA CHECK 1% -48TER 0e-e8 -87 4GE CHECK NO._ DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. • MESSAGE - 34015 0e/e3/87 144.00 AT & T TELEPHONE 144.00 10-4e56-510-51 MANUAL 3 14 +++ -CKS DISCOUNT 50-3710-003-00 MANUAL lb! 034135 0e/e3/87 56.23 EAGLE WINE DISCOUNT 50-463e-822-Se MANUAL 034135 0e/e3/87 ge 93 EAGLE_ WINE,___ INVENTORY 50-4638-84e-84 034135 0e/e3/87 68.50 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50-463e-862-86 MANUAL 034135 0e/23/87 68.50- EAGLE WINE CORRECTION 50-463e-86e-86 MANUAL zl 034135 02/23/87 _- 108.50 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50-463e-86e-86 MANUAL e55.49 4. 034138 0e/23/87 77.e5 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 MANUAL 034138 02/23/87 155.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630-86e-86 MANUAL -034138 02/e3/87 e3.5e ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4632-84e-84 MANUAL i2; ul 256.27 *++ -CKS 3I 3v 31 02/23/87 e4.94 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50 -463e-84e-84 MANUAL 24.94 _ ± +! -CKS 3 034540 02/23/87 8.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4626-822-8e MANUAL 034540 02/23/87 ee.00 TWIN CITY_WINE -INVENTORY .50-46e6-84E-84 -MANUAL----l-1-i �034540 02/23/81 34.46---­ TWIN -CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4626-862-86 MANUAL - : 61034540 0e/23/87 48.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-46e8-822-82 MANUAL 14-- 034540____ Oe/23/87 100.80 TWIN CITY WINIEL- ----I-N-VENTORY -46e8-86e-86 - 50 ------MANUAL-. 034546 oe/n/s* 77.75 F TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY SO-4630-842-84 MANUAL 141L 290.95 • 471 +++ -CKS ;4o; 1 041067 03/05I/87--- 98..77 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-8e2-8e MANUAL 155 041067 03/05/87 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-82e-82 MANUAL 1" 041067 03/05/87 2.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 541. 041067 03/05/87 69.95 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI -S4e-84 MANUAL 551 50 041067 03/05/87 6.50 CAPITAL DISTRI 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - -46e8 MANUAL 17 1 5n. . s041067 03/05/87 e74.38 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50-46e8-84e-84 MANUAL 39 474.60 2 +++ -CKS 041135 03/05/87 NE 50-3710-82e-8e MANUAL 041135 03/05/87 15.11- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL 671 041135 03/05/87 16.16- EAGLE WINE 50-371-0--84e-8.4 -MANUAL 041135 03/05/87 �16 - ' 14- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 69; 7 041 03/05/87 14.31- EAGLE WINE 50-3710-86e-86 MANUAL 710 1* 135 03/05/87 755.48 EAGLE WINE 2 6441 - 50-46e6-See-82 MANUAL 3 1 1 135 03/05/87 e,006.98 EAGLE WINE 50-46e6-84e-84 MANUAL J-14 0 41135 03/05/87 415.85 EAGLE WINE 50-4628-8e2 -82 MANUAL 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PACE 111111 1 .i so*-CKS CHECK NO. D DATE A AMOUNT V VENDOR I ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A A P.O. Y MESSAGE 041135 0 03/05/87 6 607.77 E EAGLE WINE 5 50 -4628- 842 -84 M MANUAL Z Z 041135 7 715.69 E EAGLE WINE 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 - - 4,607.73 t Jia 1 111111 _ _ 0 000-CKS •io 0 041138 0 03/05/87 1 1.76- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710 - 822 -62 M MANUAL y. 0 041138 0 03/05/87 15.44- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710 - 822 -82 M MANUAL ___ 03/05/87 ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710- 822 -82 M MANUAL E 0 041138 0 03/05/87 1 16.76- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50 -3710- 842 -84 M MANUAL 0 041138 _ 03/05/87 3 30.88- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3_710- 842 -84 M MANUAL__ _ 0 0305%87 3 36.16- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50 -3710- 842 -84 M MANUAL 041138 0 03/05/87 2 27.83- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL ' '0 041138 _ 03/05/87 _ ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL I6 0 _ 03/05/87 8 _32.75- E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL 041138 0 03/05/87 6 678.20 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50 -4626- 822 -82 M MANUAL 041138 0 03/05/87 1 1,543.86 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 4626- 842 -84 M MANUAL 041136 0 03/05/87 1 1,391.28 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 4626- 862 -86 M MANUAL �z+ _ 041138 0 03/05/87 8 88.00 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 4628 - 822 -82 M MANUAL 041138 _ 03/05/87 _ 772.05 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50_- 4628 - 822 -82 M MANUAL z: _ 0 _ _ _ 0 _ 7 ED PHILLIPS 5 50- 4628- 842 -84 M MANUAL = =" 041138 0 03/05/87 1 11808.10 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50 -4628- 842 -84 M MANUAL 041138 0 03/05/87 1 1,637.25 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50-4628-868-86 _ 0 041138 0 03%05%87 _ 4 437.62 E ED PHILLIPS 5 50 -4628- 868 -86 M MANUAL ,-: 9 9,010.63 -** - --- - -CKS 041433 _ 03/05/87 _ 6.00 P PAUSTIS &SONS 5 50 -4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL _ 0 041433 T 0 _ 0 _ 6 _ PAUSTIS 6 _ 80N$ 5 50 -4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL 041433 0 03/05/87 2 275.92- P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL 041433 0 03/05/87 2 275.92- P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50-4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL _ 0 041433 0 03/05/87 2 275.92 P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL 041433 0 03/05/87 8 8.00- P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL 041433 _ 03/05/87 2 275.92 P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628- 862-86 - __ 0 03/05/87 2 275.92 P PAUSTIS b $ONS 5 50-4628- 862 -86 M --MANUAL __I,' 041433 0 03/05/87 8 8.00 P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL 041433 _ 03/05/87 _ 8.00 P PAUSTIS & SONS_ 5 50- 4628-862 -86 — — _ _ MANUAL _ 0 _ 8 8.00- P PAUSTIS 6 SONS 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL 3 3 041433 0 03/05/87 2 275.92 P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50- 4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL . .Q 041433 0 03/05/87 _ PAUSTIS 6 SONS 5 50- 4628- 862 -86 M MANUAL -" 0 041433 0 03�05/6T 8 _ _ _2.7.5.92- P PAUSTIS & SONS 5 50 -4626- 862 -86 M MANUAL 9 9� ttt -CKS -�.1I_ 0 041435 _ 03/05/87 _ 12.65- _ WINE CO 5 50- 3710_- 822 -82 M MANUAL __ - ---- �'ll'; ___ 0 _ 1 15.83- — P _PRIOR_ W 50- 3710 - 842 -84 M L 041435 0 03/05/87 5 5.84- P PRIOR WINE CO 5 50- 3710 - 862 -86 M MANUAL ' '7 } +' _ 03/05/67 6 632_.25 P PRIOR WINE CO 5 50 -_ 4628 - 822_ -8_2 M MANUAL__ _041435 _ _ 0 03/05/87 7 791.50 P PRIOR WINE CO 5 50- 4626 - 642 -84 M MANUAL 041435 0 03/05/87 2 292.15 P PRIOR WINE CO 5 50- 4628 - 862 -86 M MANUAL „ „i } 1 1 , 681 .58 + I 1 .i so*-CKS r r r .y r d � I 041540 03/05/87 18.02- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3700- 822 -82 MANUAL • 1987• OF EDINA 03/05/87 _ _ _ _ _ _8.83- - CHECK STER WINE_ 02- 28 -8', ACE 3 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. _INV _N P.-0._— •_MESSAGE­,,-___— 041451 — 02/23/87 _. _ _ 28 — QUALITY WINE DISCOUNT_ _ —__SO -371 0- 003 -00 MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 16.70— QUALITY WINE 041540 -- SO -3710- 822 -82 ._ - - MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 16.15— QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041451 - -_ - - - -- - -- 03/05/87 _ ____1.0.95— QUALITY WINE -- MANUAL SO-3710—See—Se MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 1.69- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- S22 -S2 — MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 11.42- QUALITY WINE WINE_ 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 041451 _ 03/05/87 _ _ _- 21 .91- -.._ QUALITY WINE -- -��- � -� - -- -- -- - - - -50 -3710- 842 -84_ MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 3.27- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 .....- MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 8.92- QUALITY WINE ____ ___ __ 6.03 -_ SO- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 041451 _ 03/OS/87___ ..._03 ___QUALITY _WINE_ _ -3710- 862 -86_ 0540 041451 03/05/87 1 .50- QUALITY WINE 041540 _S0 -- 50- 3710- 862 -86 ._________MANUAL MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 834.34 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 041451 _ 03/05/87 - - -54.44_____ QUALITY WINE, - SO -4626- 822 -82_ MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 806.94 QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 SO -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 569.58 QUALITY WINE WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 041451 _ 03/05/87 _ -- _ - 163.32 QUALITY WINE CITY _WINE - -- MANUAL____ 041451 03/05/87 444.62 QUALITY WINE 0540 50 -4626- 962 -86 — _- MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 1,087.95 QUALITY WINE .83- SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 041451 _ 03/05/87 - _ 2,178.20 _ -. .- -_ - -- QUALITY_WINE -- -- . - - -__- -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 041451 03/05/87 1,142.30 QUALITY WINE 041540 _50 60- 4628- 962 -86 -- - MANUAL r 041451 03/05/87 3.07- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 'i 041451 02/23/87 -_ 27.90 __ QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 03/05/87___ 1.22 -__ 7, 204.36 • CITY WINE S0- 3710 - 862 -86_— - - - - -- - - - -- - - - 041540 03/05/87 1.05- 0540 CITY WINE __ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL r r r .y r d � I 041540 03/05/87 18.02- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3700- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ _ _ _ _ _8.83- - _ _ 0540 CITY_ WINE_ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 .79- 0340 CITY WINE --- 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 .65- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 9.22- 0540 CITY WINE -- 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 1.73- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 17.38- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 .91- 0540 CITY WINE_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82___ MANUAL___ 041540 03/05/87 1.92- 0540 CITY WINE ____ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 --MANUAL----- ANUAL 041540 03/05/87 1.05- 0540 CITY WINE SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 ____ ___ __ 6.03 -_ OS40_ CITY _WINE -- 50- 371.0- 842- 84-- 041540 03/05/87 40.57- 0540 CITY WINE ______ 60- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 3.46- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 _ 03/05/87 - 0540_CITY WINE SO- 37_10- 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 2.45- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 11.29- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 ._ _ - 83 - OS40._ CITY _WINE - -- 50 -3710- 862- 86_.- 041540 03/05/87 17.44- 0540 CITY WINE -__.____ -- .____MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 .83- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ _ .33 -_ 0540 CITY WINE SO -3710- 862 -86�_— MANUAL__ 041540 03/05/87 1.05- 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 __ MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 4.58- 0540 CITY WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87___ 1.22 -__ 0540 CITY WINE S0- 3710 - 862 -86_— MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 1.05- 0540 CITY WINE __ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 041540 03/05/87 .83- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 _ 03/05/87 - 461.35 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -8E MANUAL , 041540 03/05/87 869.00 0540 CITY WINE - - - 50- 4626 - 828 -82 MANUAL : -. 041540 03/05/87 2,028.77 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL .n t 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT - -- VENDOR - - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 041540 02/23/87 64.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -64 MANUAL 041540 02/23/87 829.31 _ TWIN CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 871.65 _ 0540 CITY _ _ WINE _I_NVEN_T_ORY _ _ 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 02/23/87 44.40 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ _ 193.52 _ 0540 CITY WINE_ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL_- 041540 02/23/87 12.80 _ TWIN CITY _ WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628 - 822 -82 - MANUAL -: " 041540 03/05/87 64.85 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 - -- .00 -- -- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 172.75 0540 CITY WINE - - - - - - -- -- - 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 78.99 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 90.34 - 0540 CITY WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 t,i26.00 0540 CITE WIWE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 603.31 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ 244.35 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 02/23/87 66.80 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 104.92 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 ____ _491.65 _ CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 345.50 __0540 0540 CITY -- - - - - - WINE -- -- -- - - 50- 4628 - 842 -84 - - -- -- - MANUAL - 041540 03/05/87 39.95 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 104.92 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 .00 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 82.80- 0540`CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ 122.20 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 458.62 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 82.88 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 _ 82.80 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 041540 03/05/87 104.45 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL X041540 02/23/87 87.20 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1 9,610.77 r rrrrrr 000-CKS 1 044782 02/23/87 21000.00 POSTMASTER - POSTAGE _ 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 2,000.00 r rrrrrr - - -- - - - -- - -- -------- --- ------------------ - - -- -- -- wrr -CKS 049067 03/05/87 3.00 _ _ CAPITAL CITY DISTRI___ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 049067 03/05/87 98.94 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI - 50- 4628- 822 -82 _ -_ MANUAL 049067 03/05/87 149.90 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 049067 03/05/87 ______ 5.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI____ 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 049067 03/05/87 174.95 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI- - _ - 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 049067 03/05/87 5.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 436.79 • rwwrrr wrr -CKS �. 049129 03/05/87 - - - 1 0.37- - - BELLBOY - -- - - 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 049129 03/05/87 649.68 BELLBOY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 049129 03/05/87 2,491.92 _ -. HELL OY _ 50- 4626 - 842 -84- MANUAL •� 049129 03/05/87 2,098.90 BELLBOY _ _ `_- - 60- 4626 - 862 -86 - ___ -�_ ... MANUAL -- I, r 5,230.13 + rrr -CKS 049135 03/05/87 70- EAGLE WINE _ - - - -_ _ -i5 _ -- _ 5,0- 3710 - 822 -82 - __' -- - --_ -- MANUAL 1s � .1 J 1987', OF EDINA CHECK STER 02- 28 -8', AGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT ___ VENDOR DESCRIPTION_ ACCOUNT_ NO. INV. Q_P_.0._AMESSAGE -- M I 049135 03/05/87 8.93- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 842-84 MANUAL 049135 03/05/87 -- -- - 13.55- - - -- EAGLE WINE - -EAGLE _ _ _ - 50- 3710 - 862 -86_ MANUAL 049135 03/05/87 284.95 WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL i 049135 03/05/87 446.52 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL - 049135 _03/05/87 - 677.71 -- - -- - EAGLE WINE - - -- 50_ 4628 - 862- 86--- MANUAL. 049135 02/23/87 59.39 EAGLE WINE - - - -- INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 - -. -._ - -- MANUAL 1..440.39 M ssr -CKS 049138 03/05/87 16.82- ED PHILLIPS 50-.3710-82e-82 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 22.33- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �j 049138 03/05/87 4.24- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 049138 _ _ - 03/05/87 _ _ 24.55-ED PHILLIPS -3710-842-84 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 9.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL -- • 049138 03/05/87 73.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 049138 _ 03/05/87 ___ ED PHILLIPS - 50- 3710 - 862 -86.- MANUAL- 049138 63/05/87 40.45- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 __.___ MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 16.53- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 5.90- __ -_ _ - -. ED PHILLIPS - -__50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 1,116.44 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 3,656.38 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 2,022.70 ED PHILLIPS_ _ - 049138 03/05/87 841.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _MANUAL MANUAL • 049138 03/05/87 212.06 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 049138 _ _ 03/05/87 1 ,227.60 . _ -- ED PHILLIPS -_� _ - -� 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL. 049138 03/05/87 456.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ _ _ MANUAL 049138 03/05/87 295.13 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' -- 049138 03/OS/87..._ _ - 54.50- ED PHILLIPS___ _ -4628- 862- 86 MANUAL_ 049138 03/05/87 826.55 ED PHILLIPS - -50 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -' MANUAL X049138 02/23/87 23.52 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 MANUAL ' - ssssss sss -CKS 049190 03/05/87 14.37- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 049190 03/05/87 23.13- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 049190 03/05/87 32. 03- - -- - - -- GRIGGS COOPER AND C - - -_- 049190 03/05/87 718.65 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 ---.-.MANUAL MANUAL - 049190 03/05/87 1,156.29 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 049190 03/05/87 1,601.57 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL �- 049190 02/23/87 4.20- 6RI66S COOPER' DISCOUNT 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' ,049190 02/23/87 25.45 GRI66S COOPER INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842-84 MANUAL 3,428.23 s rsssss *00-CKS 049435 03/05/87 2.72- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 049435 03/05/87 4.77- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 049435 03/05/87 -__ _ 6.67 - _PRIOR _WINE _CO 50- 3710 - 862- 86 _ MANUAL 049435 03/05/87 135.95 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL • 049435 03/05/87 03/05/87 238.70 333.38 PRIOR WINE CO PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL I, _049435 - 049435 -- 02/23/87 30.00 PRIOR WINE INVENTORY _50 =4628- 862_ -86 50- 4632 - 622 -82 - MANUALj� MANUAL 723.87 • .1 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ _ - VENDOR - ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE — rrrwrr 049451 03/05/87 1.61- QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 7.32 - QUALITY WINE 049451 - 03%05/87 - -- - -- -- - 1 .28- -- -- QUALITY WINE-- - 0494S1 03/05/87 47.79- QUALITY WINE 049451 03/OS/87 4.33- QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 43.85---"-' _ QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 364.53 QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 2,385.78 QUALITY WINE 049451 _ _ 03/05/87 _ _ 2,189.50 _ QUALITY WINE 049451 03/OS/87 160.00 QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 127.95 QUALITY WINE 049451 03/05/87 _ 429.40 _ QUALITY WINE — 049540 03/05/87 5,550.98 0 — 0540 CITY 4 1 rwr -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 _ -_ MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL _ 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL _50- 50 -4626- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ — MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 4 1 *00-CKS 049540 03/05/87 - --- 67.93- - - - - -- - - - -- - --- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 i . T2- 0540 CITY WINE - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - -- 50- 371 0- 822 -82 ._ - - -- - -- MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 19.36- 0540�CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 - - -- 5.03- - -- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 -- 1.08- -- — 0540 CITY WINE — 71 50- 30- 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 40.34- 0540 CITY WINE 50-3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _ 3.65 -• -- 0540 -0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 8.24- CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/67 .12 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 1 049540 03/05/87 _ 1.23- _ — 0540 CITY WINE MANUAL 049540 03/OS/87 10 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 5.79- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _ 5.79 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 3.11- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 5.79- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _ _ .90- _ 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 .23 0540 CITY WINE 56 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 20.50- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 5.10 - 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 63.60 TWIN CITY WINE ___ INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL y 049540 03/05/87 967.34 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 30.80 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _ 2,017.04 _ 0540 CITY __ WINE _ _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 — _ _ MANUAL * 049540 03/05/87 1,024.49 0540 CITY WINE SO- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 4.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 57.60 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL y 049540 03/05/87 502.12 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 172.30 _ 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 107.73 0540 _ CITY WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL s 049540 03/05/87 122.60 0540.CITY WINE 50-4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _— - _ 6.45 -- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 824.68 6546 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 .00 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL 049540 _ 03/05/87 - 10.48- ___0540 CITY WINE_ 50-_4628- 842 -84_ MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 364.40 CITY 0540 WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 42.80 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 4 1 1987 -( OF EDINA CHECK 3TER 02 -28 -81 .GE 7 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 6 P.O. N MESSAGE 049540 03/05/87 579.95- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862-86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 , _ 579.95 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 -- __. _ MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 510.69 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL j 049540 02/23/87 24.00 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 _ _ — 90.30 -_ OS40_CITY _WINE__ ___ -_ S0- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 579.95 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 049540 03/05/87 11.96- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL • . - 049540 03/05/87 _._..,- 310.75 0540 _CITY WINE _- - - . - , 50- 4628 - 862 -86 . __ -- . -_ - _ , - MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 159.74 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 049540 02/23/87 77.75 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 7,842.26 r rrrrrr *so-CKS - 051174 02/23/87 147,000.00- 187 BANK SD BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL - 051174 02/23/87 147,000.00 1ST BANK SD BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL is- _ - - - - -- - -- - - - -- .00 r -- - _- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - - - -- - - -- - rrrrrr rrr -CKS 051198 02/23/87 66,698.28- GROUP HEALTH CORRECTION 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL 051198 02/23/87 66,698.28 GROUP HEALTH CITY PAD HOSP 10- 4156- S10 -51 MANUAL - 051198 02/23/87 6,698.28 GROUP HEALTH CITY PAD —_ 10- 4156- 510 -S1 - - - MANUAL 6,698.28 r -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- rrrrrr - -.._. - - - -- -- rrr -CKS -- 051430 02/23/87 20,745.92 PERA CITY PORTION PERA 10- 4145 - 510 -81 MANUAL • 20,745.92 r rrrrrr rrr -CKS • ' 051442 02/23/87 12,201.84 PHY HEALTH CITY PD k6 SP 10- 4156 - 510 -S1 MANUAL - -- - 12,201.84 r -- ri *rir ------ - - - -- - - - - -- --- - - - - - -- ----- -000- CKS -- • 051506 02/23/87 _ 10,241.47 _ southwest fidelity CITY_PORTION FICA - -_.- 10- 4149 - 51.0 -51 051506 02/23/87 110.28 southwest fidelity CITY PORTION MEDC ____ 10- 4162- S10 -51 - .___ - -___. _,MANUAL _,- MANUAL 10,351.75 r :'• rrrrrr rrr -CKS • 051700 02/23/87._ __ „__ _- __ __1 , 694.00. US___POSTMASTER _ -__ BULK,_,MAIL_ 1 0- 4802 - 600- 60 -- _ -_ _ _MANUAL 1,694.00 r 051701 02/23/87 - - 138.00 - U OF M _- REGISTRATION 10 -4206- 500 -S0_ MANUAL 138.00 i #051702 _ _ 02/23/87 191.70 LIFE CITY PD INS 10- 4157 - 510 =51 - - --MANUAL 191.70 r rrrrrr__ **O -CKS_- 054095 03/03/87 82.06 COMM OF REVENUE STATE SALES TAX 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL r 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 054095 03/03/87 82.06 COMM OF REVENUE 054095 03/03/87 82.06— COMM OF REVENUE 054095 03/03/87 186.42 _ COMM OF REVENUE s 054095 03/03/87 321.55 COMM OF REVENUE DISTRI 054095 03/03/87 265.13 CITY OF REVENUE__ 054095 03/03/87 ____COMM 66.38 COMM OF REVENUE 054095 03/03/87 516.95 COMM OF REVENUE 054095 03/03/87 61298.01 COMM OF REVENUE 054095 _ 03/03/87 12,233.2S COMM OF _ REVENUE i 054095 03/03/87 11,166.47 COMM OF REVENUE 2,058.94 + zd 31,136.25 t + ttt «tt 054700 03/03/87 95.00 POSTMASTER 'j 95.00 + 055067 055067 055067 055067 055067 p 055067 055067 055067 055067 055067 ITEM DESCRIPTION GENERAL CORRECTION STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX __STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX STATE SALES TAX POSTAGE 03/05/87 14.17- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI _ 03/05/87 2.00 CAPITAL CITY _ DISTRI 03/05/87 68.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 03/05/87 10.00 CITY DISTRI 03/05/87 -- _ _______CAPITAL 349.90 CAPITAL CITY DISTR I 03/05/87 5.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 03/05/87 119.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 03/05/87 _ 4.90 CAPITAL CITY -- - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- DISTRI 03/05/87 187.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 03/03/87 48.75 CAPITAL CITY DIST INVENTORY 778.26 780.88 « 055135 03/05/87 - -- - - -- - ti MANUAL 10- 3357-000 -00 MANUAL ttr «tt MANUAL 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 055129 03/05/87 2,109.36 BELLBOY 055129 03/05/87 728.84 BELLBOY 50- 3357- 002 -00 MANUAL e,838.20 « - - -- y «11«11 MANUAL 055135 03/05/87 5.62- EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 .07 EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 15.57- EAGLE WINE s 055135 03/05/87 16.86- EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 281.15 EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 7.49- _ EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 778.26 EAGLE WINE 055135 03/05/87 842.99 WINE______ 055135 , _ 03/03/87 _ 34.23 ____EAGLE _ EAGLE WINE - INVENTORY s 1.055135 03/03/87 167.78 EAGLE_ WINE INVENTORY 2,058.94 + zd 02 -28 -87 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 10- 3357-000 -00 MANUAL 23 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 28- 000 -00__ MANUAL__-_ _3357- _ _ 29- 3357 - 000 -00 — MANUAL 40-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 50 -3357- 001 -00 MANUAL 50- 3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 50 -3357- 003 -00 MANUAL ttt -CKS 10- 4290 - 510 -51 — - -_ -- -- MANUAL I ttt -CKS 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50-4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50 -4632- 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 titt «t -i' 055138 - 03/OS/87 — 11.81- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3 3710 - 822 -82 si 055138 03/05/87 65.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ttt -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL tt« -CKS 1 .4 MANUAL MANUAL s � ttt -CKS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 - -_ - - MANUAL -- 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 5074628- 842 -84 _ -_ MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 _ _. _ _ MANUAL ._ . 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL ttt -CKS 50-4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50-4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50 -4632- 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 titt «t -i' 055138 - 03/OS/87 — 11.81- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3 3710 - 822 -82 si 055138 03/05/87 65.59- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 ttt -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL tt« -CKS 1 .4 MANUAL MANUAL s � 055435 03/05/87 _____-.03 __ __ PRIOR WINE WINE • •- I 198Y OF EDINA PRIOR CHECK STER _CO CO CHECK NO.--DATE--. AMOUNT VENDOR WINE CO 055138 03/05/87 8.52— ED PHILLIPS WINE CO 055138 03/05/87 6.10 —__ ED PHILLIPS WINE CO 055138 03/05/87 32.68— ED PHILLIPS WINE CO 055138 03/05/87 58.59— ED PHILLIPS WINE 055138 03/05/87 12.38— ED PHILLIPS WINE _CO CO 055138 03/05/87 4.82— ED PHILLIPS —_ " 055138 03/05/87 305.00 ED PHILLIPS 055138 03/05/87 — 21929.58 ED PHILLIPS 055138 03/05/87 3,279.55 ED PHILLIPS - " 055138 03/05/87 590.50 ED PHILLIPS 055138 03/05/87 426.20_____ ED 055138 03/05/87 ____ 1,633.95 _PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS 055138 03/05/87 240.96 ED PHILLIPS s - 055138 03/05/87 - -- - 618.80 ED PHILLIPS � 9,824.05 • rrrrrr .'1 055190 03/05/87 27.02- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 055190 03/05/87 _ 44.02 -_ __ __ GRIGGS COOPER AND C_____ 055190 03/05/87 5.35- GRIGGS COOPER —_ . AND C 055190 03/05/87 184.43- GRIGGS COOPER AND C "I 055190 _ 03/05/87 _ _ _ 1, 351 . 04 GRIGGS COOPER_ AND C 055190 03/05/87 ____ _ 2,200.86 GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ -- _ 055190 03/05/87 267.66 GRIGGS COOPER AND C . 055190 03/05/87 9,221.62 GRIGGS COOPER AND C— 12,780.36 + — ' rrrrrr 05S433 03/05/87 5.60 PAUSTIS b SONS 055433 03/05/87 351.32 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 055433 03/03/87 _ 51.00 PAUSTIS R SONS ' 407.92 + 055435 03/05/87 _____-.03 __ __ PRIOR WINE WINE 055435 03/05/87 .62- PRIOR WINE _CO CO 055435 03/05/87 2.45- PRIOR WINE CO 055435 03/05/87 6.08 -____ MANUAL WINE CO 055435 03/05/87 31.00 __PRIOR PRIOR WINE CO 055435 03/05/87 2.78- PRIOR WINE CO 055435 03/05/87 _ 122.25 PRIOR WINE 055435 03/05/87 _ 5.70- PRIOR WINE _CO CO 055435 03/05/87 303.75 PRIOR WINE CO ' 439.40 + • rrrrrr 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 0 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 14 QUALITY WINE 11.83- QUALITY WINE 13.43- QUALITY_ WINE 14.13- QUALITY WINE .24 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY -- - - - -- - 02 -28 -81t .AGE 9 ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0.. INV__ -N _P_.0.-_ N MESSAGE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86_. ____. -_ _ MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 . _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 -_ MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL —._ _ 50 =4628- 862 -86 _, _._._ MANUAL _ INVENTORY -- - - - -- - rrr -CKS -- 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 _ - -__ .. MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL SO -4 4626- 862 -86 _ -_ _ _ - MANUAL _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4630 - 842 -84 +++ -CKS ' MANUAL ' MANUAL MANUAL - -- 000- CKS — 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 - -- - - -- — MANUAL-- 50- 4628- 822 -82 _ MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 _ MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL +++ -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' SO- 3710 - 842 -84_ MANUAL_ 50- 3710 -842 -84 _ MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 055451 AMOUNT VENDOR 03/05/87 3.44- QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 47.95- QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 _ 590.60 QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 704.85 QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 54.44 QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 _ _ 54.44- QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 54.44- QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 2,394.16 QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 14.37 -- _ QUALITY _ WINE 03/05/87 303.08- QUALITY WINE 03/05/87 WINE QUALITY WINE _ 03/05/87 _1,_335.25 340.75 _ QUALITY _ WINE 03/05/87 23.96- QUALITY WINE 4,879.36 • ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. #-P-.-O-.---# MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50 -4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50 -4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 622 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50-4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL.___ MANUAL MANUAL . •••••• ••• -CKS 055540- 03/05/87 - 75.35- - 0540 CITY WINE - 50- 3700 - 822 -82 - - -- MANUAL . 055540 03/05/87 47.13- 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 134.16- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 58.20- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 .85- 0540 ;CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 _ _.80- 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 95- _____0540_CITY_WINE 0540 CITY _ _____ __ WIN _ E 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 1.75- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 _ 5.17- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 1.11- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 42.67- 0540 CITY WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 .69- _ 0540_CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 3.33- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 161.43- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 .87- _ 0540 CITY WINE 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 26.57- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 9 055540 03/05/87 4.64- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 1.99- _ 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 2.80 -- 0540 CITY _ WINE - 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 21909.80 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL , 055540 03/05/87 2,133.60 _ 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 8,070.69 0540 CITY _____ _ _ WINE 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 1,328.35 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 232.06_ _ ___0540 CITY WINE 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 93.92 0540 CITY ______ WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 .00 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 85.76 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 80.05 0540 CITY'WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 175.44 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 111.30 0540 CITY _WINE__ 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 517.37 0540 CITY WINE - 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 .00 0540.CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 -_ -_ .00 -- 0540 CITY WINE__ - ____ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL___ 055540 03/05/87 280.21 0540 CITY ____ WIN E 50- 4628- 862 -86 - MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 87.90 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL , 055540 03/05/87 - - - -_ 333.55 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 69.10 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 055540 03/05/87 198.74 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL w � I r . 1987 OF EDINA CHECK STER 02- 28 -8't .AGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT -- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P_0__A_- MESSAGE ______. —I' 116,137.38 + BRY_ENTERPR_ISES 50- 371.0- 822 -82 BRU ENTERPRISES 50 -4628- 822 -82 F.M.A.M — CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 440 -44 * ** —CKS MANUAL , - - - -- MANUAL - - -- - — — — MANUAL *** —CKS -- T 05.7251_ — 03/03/87 -- 750,000,.00_ HRA_ -_ _ DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL _- 750,000.00 + r 057700 03/03/87 160.80 PAYROLL ACCT. 160.80 + 058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT 058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT 20.00 + I _ 02/24/87 —_ 061 092 - -- 02%24/87 - - - - -- 105.88 - -- 055751_ 1.70 —_ _03/_05/87 ci 1055751 03/05/87 _ 113.14 061508 111.44 i 055752 03/03/87 — 150.00 57.90- 150.00 + BRY_ENTERPR_ISES 50- 371.0- 822 -82 BRU ENTERPRISES 50 -4628- 822 -82 F.M.A.M — CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 440 -44 * ** —CKS MANUAL , - - - -- MANUAL - - -- - — — — MANUAL *** —CKS -- T 05.7251_ — 03/03/87 -- 750,000,.00_ HRA_ -_ _ DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL _- 750,000.00 + r 057700 03/03/87 160.80 PAYROLL ACCT. 160.80 + 058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT 058701 03/03/87 10.00 MN COMMERCE DEPT 20.00 + I _ 02/24/87 —_ 061 092 - -- 02%24/87 - - - - -- 105.88 - -- - 061092 02/24/87 105.88- .00 061508 02/24/87 061125 02/24/87 ST PAUL BOOK 57.90- -, 57.90 —* 061508 C l S DIET INC C 6 S DIST INC CANCER INS NOTARY FEE NOTARY FEE COST 6 V COMA CORRECTION 10- 1015 - 000 -00 10- 4200 - 510 -51 10 -4260- 510 -51 23- 464241341 045304 23- 4642- 613 -61 045304 MERIT SUPPLY CORRECTION 28-4512- 702 -70 16176 — * ** -CKS MANUAL *** —CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** —CKS * ** —CKS — * ** —CKS - -- - _061508 _ 02/24/87 —_ 6.95 —_ ST_ PAUL _BOOK CORRECTION 061508 02/24/87 6.95 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 133 -12 371418 061508 02/24/87 4.26— ST PAUL BOOK GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 133 -12 371418 _ 061508 _ _ --02/24/87---- 4226 -- ST PAUL BOOK GEN_SUPPLY 10- 4504- 133 - 12371418- — *** * * * - - - -- — -- - - - -- * ** —CKS 061526 02/24/87 284.13 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10-4612 - 560 -56 440670 061526_ —'I - -___ 02/24/87 284.13- TRACY OIL CORRECTION 10 -4612- 560 -56 440670 ^ 00 — *** —CKS 17:, — ;,I �. 063067 03/05/87 9.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 749 '7 J• i 1 0 . 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT _12 063067 03/05/87 321.87 063067 _03/05/87 _ _ _ _ 11.00 063067 03/05/87 377.84 719.71 + CHECK REGISTER ---VENDOR CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITACCITY DISTRI 02 -28 -87 PAGE 12 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 642 -84 MANUAL ; 50- 4628- 862 -86 -----MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL �I 063135 03/05/87 35.37- - -- EAGLE WINE_ 3710 - 822 -82 � 063135 03/05/87 10.99 - -EAGLE __ 1JINE - _ - - -50- 50 -3710- 842 -84 _ 063135 03/05/87 36.48- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ 063135 _ _ 03/05/87 1,_768.70 EAGLE WINE_ 50-4628- 822 -82 06313S 03/05/87 __ S49.45 - EAGLE WINE __ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 _ 1 063135 03/05/87 1,824.08 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 4,059.39 + �,i rrrrr+ 063138 063138 063138 663138 063138 063138 063138 063138 063138 063138 063138 __063138 063138 063138 063138 063138 063138 X063138 rrr + +r 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/81 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/05/87 03/04/87 03/04/87 40 12- ' ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 4.84- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - 20.38- ED PHILLIPS__ 50- 3710- 842 -84 70.94- ED ___ _ ___ PHILLIPS - __ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 4.45- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 59.07- _ -- ED — PHILLIPS_ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 35.38- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 10.73- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 -- 3,546.88 - -- - ED PHILLIPS - 50- 4626- 842 -84 2, 953.31 ED PHILLIPS - -- -- - - - - -- - - -- -- 50- 4626-862 -66 2,005.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 242.24 - - -_ - - -� ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 1 , 019.1 1. ED PHILLIPS _ -- - — 50- 4628- 842 -84 222.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 -- _1,768.95__ - - - - -- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 536.57 ED PHILLIPS — 50- 4628 - 862 -86 6'1.76 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 622 -82 — - _76.40 -� — ED -- -- PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50-4630- 842 -84 12, 189.51 _ 03/05/87 _ - -- - - - -- -- - — - -- i' !F!- CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL + ++ -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL _ MANUAL " MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL +r+ -EKA 063190 03/05/87 5.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 063190 03/05/87_­_________­­ 5. 1 .08- ___-GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50-3710-84e-84 MANUAL - 063190 03/05/87 6.42- GRIGGS COOPER AND-C-­ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL ' 063190 03/05/87 2,553.92 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 063190 03/05/87 - _.. 259.80 _ -- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL._— _ 063190 03/05/81 320.89 GRIGGS COOPER AND _ __ -- -- - C--' — _- 50-4626- 862 -86 -- - MANUAL 3,071.91 + - - - - -- +wrrrr - -- - - --- r**-CKS ' 063435 _ 03/05/87 _ 3.26- — PRIOL WINE CO, _— 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL____ 063435 03/05/87 10.53- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 842 -84 _ _____ MANUAL 063435 03/05/87 4.03- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 063435 _ 03/05/87 — 162.90 _PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL „1d (7.' 063435 03/05/87 526.59 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 063435 03/05/87 E01.50 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL "I' - -- —1ST7 o • • 1987` OF EDINA CHECK STER 02- 28 -8'1 AGE 13 i CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _VENDOR_ ITEM_ DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT _NO. I -NV_f P _0._N_ MESSAGE _ -_— 063435 03/04/87 111.41 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 063435 __03/04/87 _ —_ _y — _49.E8 EAGLE _WINE — INVENTORY _ —_ 50- 4632- 842- 84 _ _ _ - MANUAL 063435 03/04/87 66.44 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1,100.30 • •*• —CKS 063451 _ 03/05/87 04 —__— ___.,QUALITY. WINE — —_.— 50- 3710- 822- 82__.______ MANUAL 063451 03/05/87 — 3.65— QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 063451 03/05/87 10.99— QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL =i _063451 03/05/87 18.57- ______ QUALITY .._.__ _ 50- 3710 - 842- 84 MANUAL 063451 03/05/87 - - 17.22- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 063451 03/05/87 .68 QUALITY WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 063451 _ _ 03/05/87 - - -_- 1 0.83__ - QUALITY _WINE ,. _. -,- __50-371 0- 862- 86._._______._ MANUAL ht063451 03/05/87 548.16 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 'I U x063451 03/05/87 540.46 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL t�y063451 -_ 03/05/87 — _- 3.87- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL x,063451 03/05/87 362.80 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 063451 03/05/87 1,841.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 063451 _ 03/05/87 .____ _1,706.65 `_ _QUALITY WINE _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 ___ MANUAL ?I 063451 03/05/87 6.76— QUALITY IN WE BO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 4,928.75 • 1 =, -- -- � Myis 000— CKS -- 063540 03/05/87 _. _ 39.60— CITY WINE ,� _ 50- 3700 - 822 -82._ ____MANUAL ._ 063540 03/05/87 125.03— 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 5.04— 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL is 063540 _.___03/OS/87 _ ! 6.25 -_ __ 0540_CITY_WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82_ MANUAL__ 063540 03/05/87 .43 0540 CITY WINE --- so MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 .64 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 _ 03/05/87 _ 4. 15- 0540 CITY WINE 50 -371 0- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 4.38- 0540 CITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 .03 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 OE 054_0_ CITY WINE 50- 3_710- 842 -84 MANUAL__ 063540 03/05/87 104.79- 0540 CITY _ WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 8.31- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 8.21- 50- 3710 - 842- 84 MANUAL __OS40_CITY_WINE__ S` 063540 03/05/87 9.99- 0540 CITY WINE 50-3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 063540 03/05/87 16.98- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87_ _ .02 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ _ MANUAL I' 063540 03/05/87 02- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 063540 03/05/87 8.58- 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 34.16_ -0540 CITY WINE - _.. _.._ ..____ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL -__�•_ 063540 03/05/87 .28 0540 CITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL I' 063540 03/05/87 1.65- 0540 CITY WINE SO- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL I , 063540 _ - 03/05/87 7.51 -_ 0540_ CITY _WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 _ ____MANUAL _I 063540 03/04/87 22.40 TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL �_.. 063540 03/05/87 2.88 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 __03/05/87_ 5,239.62 0540_CITY_WINE_ 50 -4626- 842 -84 __ MANUAL.- 063540 03/05/87 849.05 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 1,708.57 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL ,,• 063540 03/05/87 437.64 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 414.35 0540 CITY WINE 50-4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 503.32 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 — MANUAL s , - - - -- - - - 7C d 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 02 -28 -87 PAGE 14 .I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR -- ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE _,21 03/05/87 43.63— 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL I, �, 063540 — 03/05/87 _ -- _ _ 3.87— — 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 65.20- _ 0540 CITY WINE _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 625.57 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 I: MANUAL 6 063540 03/05/87 .00 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 063540 ____ 03/05/87 _ 821.39 __ 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL Bi 063540 03/05/87 2.88— 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 9; 063540 03/04/87 - - -- — 89.20 _ TWIN CITY WINE INVENTORY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 2.88— 0540 CITY - WINE -- -- — - - -- 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 063540 03/05/87 .00 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87_— -- S29.14 0540 CITY WINE 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 998.59 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 _ MANUAL 063540 03/05/87 749.83 0540 CITY WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - 063540 03/05/87 — - - -- 29.48- 0540 CITY WINE_______ 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL '2 063540 03/05/87 858.28 0540 CITY WINE _50- 50- 4628 - 862 -86 — MANUAL = ,171 '063540 03/05/87 165.1E 0540 CITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 13,783.78 — 804,673.35 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND ;. = 186.42 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 321.55 FUND 27 FUND 28 TOTAL TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND Hand typed checks li's 75803 — _ —207.23 __ _ _RECREAT_ION CENTER FUND t ru�5903 66.38 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND T 516.95 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 168,574.37 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND s (,i i 994,546.25 TOTAL s , - - - -- - - - 7C d