HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-05-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
MAY 4, 1987
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF APRIL 20, 1987
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *)
are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be
no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so
requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and
considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of April 20, 1987
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats
Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final
Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass.
* A. Lot Division - 6820 Cheyenne Circle - B. McGlynn
* B. Set Hearing Date (5/18/87)
1. Namron Corporation - Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - R -1 to
PRD -4 Planned Residence District - Generally located north of Vernon
Av and west of Villa Way
2. Fairview Southdale Hospital - Construction of a new medical office
building - 6401 France Avenue
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - U.T.F.C. Addition - Generally located east
of Washington Av and north of I -494
4. Regis Corporation - Construction of a new office building - 5000
Normandale Rd
5. Flood Plain Ordinance Amendment
IV. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass.
Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council
required to pass.
A. First Readin
1. Ordinance No. 825 -A18 - An Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to Allow
Curbside Pick -up of Leaves /Grass Clippings
2. Ordinance No. 711 -A4 - An Amendment to Ordinance No. 711 to Allow
Curbside Pick -up of Leaves /Grass Clippings in the Morningside Area
3. Ordinance No. 434 -AlO - An Amendment to Ordinance No. 434 Changing the
Electrical Requirements for Swimming Pools
V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VI. AWARD OF BIDS
A. Renewal of Liability Insurance for Police and Public Officials
* B. Annual Concrete Supply
* C. Truck Replacement - Park Dept
* D. Minnehaha Creek Millpond Weed Harvesting
M
Agenda
Edina City Council
Page Two
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. I -494 Corridor Study Report by Consultant
B. Revocation of Food Establishment License - Swensens
C. Centennial Commission Challenge
D. Appointment to Heritage Preservation Board
E. Council Liaison
F. Goose Control Project
-VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Council Brochure
X. FINANCE
A: Public Hearing - Proposed Issuance by City of Edina of General Obligation
Tax Increment Refunding Bonds
B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 5/4/87: General Fund $188,099.20,
Art Center $6,696.95, Capital Fund $74.00, Swimming Pool Fund $263.00, Golf
Course Fund $27,332.24, Recreation Center Fund $786.30, Gun Range Fund
$195.67, Utility Fund $230,478.23, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,644.37,
Construction Fund $1,803.09, Total $458,373.85
Mon May 11
Mon May 11
Tues May 12
Mon May 18
Mon June 1
June 9 - 12
Mon June 15
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Board of Review
Joint Council /School Board Meeting
Special Meeting - Hedberg Property
Regular Council Meeting
Regular Council Meeting
LMC Annual Conference
Regular Council Meeting
5:00 p.m. Council Room
8:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse
5:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse
7:00 p.m. Council Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
Mayor Civic Center - Rochester
7:00 p.m. Council Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
APRIL 20, 1987
Answering rollcall were .Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and
Courtney.
MINUTES of the H.R.A. meeting of April 6,1987 were approved as submitted
by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH PHASE VI COURTYARD DRAINS AND UTILITIES. Manager
Rosland presented the bid of Wenzel Mechanical at $13,398.00 for courtyard
drains for Edinborough Phase VI Condominiums as sole bidder and installer of
the courtyard drains for the other phases. Motion of Commissioner Turner
was seconded by Commissioner Smith for award of bid to Wenzel Mechanical at
$13,398.00.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned
by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion
carried.
Executive Director
i
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
APRIL 20, 1987
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' SWIMMING TEAM AND EDINA MIDGET A HOCKEY TEAM COMMENDED
Mayor Courtney presented resolutions commending the Edina High School Boys'.
Swimming Team,and the Edina Midget A Hockey Team for their.accomplishments in
winning recent State championships. The resolutions were unanimously adopted.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member
Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes:, Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 6. 1987 APPROVED. Motion was
made by Member Kelly, seconded.by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the
regular meeting of April 6, 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT NO P -BA -278 CONTINUED TO 5/18. Manager
Rosland advised that staff and representatives of Superamerica are continuing to
negotiate types of alternatives for the proposed Link Road improvement that would -
be satisfactory to allow the continued operation of Superamerica . Staff would
recommend continuation of the public hearing to May 18. Motion of Member Turner
was seconded by Member Kelly.to continue the public hearing on Street Improvement
No. P -BA -278 (Link Road) to the Council Meeting of May 18, 1987.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,-Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR LOT 5. MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH). 'Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Craig Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Lot 5, Muir
Woods, generally located north of Braemar Boulevard and east and west of Valley
View Road, noting that the public hearing was continued from March 16, 1987. The
subject parcel is approximately two acres in size and is developed with a single
family dwelling in the central portion of the property. The subdivision request
proposed to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would measure 41,630 square
feet in area and the lot for the existing dwelling would contain 40,073 square
feet. Mr.' Larsen pointed out that the topography of the new lot is quite severe.
Grades of 40 percent or more occur adjacent to the street on both the east and
.west side. In order to provide a manageable grade for a driveway.to the new lot,
an easement over the easterly portion of the lot for the existing dwelling is
proposed. This easement area will allow the construction of a driveway with a
grade of approximately 15 percent. The request was heard by the Community
Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of January 28, 1987 and the
Commission recommended approval for these reasons: a) the lots are very large and
there will be adequate spacing between the existing homes to the north and south,
b) the property. driveways are steep but not unlike other driveways in the area, c)
,locating the new drive on the east side is preferred since the property across the
street is park property. The Commission recommended approval of the preliminary
plat conditioned on: l) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3)
payment of utility connection charges. Mr. Larsen advised that following the
hearing by the - Commission it was discovered that there were some existing deed
restrictions on the property whereby other property owners in the Muir Woods plat
had to sign off before any further subdivision could be made. The public hearing
by the Council on the preliminary plat was continued to allow the proponent to
negotiate the deed restrictions. He reported that the parties involved have
reached an agreement with regard to negotiating an amendment to the deed
restrictions between now and final plat approval. Mr. Larsen said that the
proponent, Robert Griffith, was present to answer questions. No comment or.
objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "LOT 5, MUIR WOODS ", platted by Robert T. Griffith and
presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is
hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall:.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
REQUEST FOR FINAL REZONING TO PRD -4 AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR NAMRON CORPORATION
REFERRED BACK TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION. Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen advised that the subject property is generally located north of Vernon
Avenue and West of Villa;Way, He recalled that preliminary rezoning to PRD -4 and
preliminary plat approval for the property had been granted by the Council at its
meeting of September 8, 1986. The preliminary plat approved illustrated a three
story, 135 unit apartment building with 169 underground parking spaces and 68
surface parking spaces. The proponent has now returned with overall development
plans to support a request for final zoning and final plat approval. Mr. Larsen
advised that the proposal continues to illustrate a three story, 135 unit building
with the same parking spaces. The exterior of the building remains unchanged and
will be brick with lap siding accents and will have a hip roof. The building has
been sited approximately 10 feet to the West but continues to meet or exceed all
setbacks required by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen reminded the Council that
at preliminary rezoning and plat approval, the Council imposed several conditions
to be addressed before final plat approval. First, construction of a sidewalk
along Vernon Avenue adjacent to the property. The sidewalk is shown on the final
development plan and is also included in the developer's agreement. Secondly, a
storm water management plan.to be approved by the City Engineer. A plan has been
submitted that was reviewed and approved by the Engineer and has also been
reviewed by the staff of,the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District'. The result
should reduce storm_ water following substantial rainfall in the.area. adjacent to
Glen Brae Circle:. Thirdly, a variance was requested to reduce the surface parking
requirement of 101 spaces to 68 spaces thereby reducing the hard surface area. A
proof of .parking agreement has been signed by the developer which provides that
the City may at its discretion require that 33 surface parking spaces be added to
bring the parking up to Ordinance requirements if the need arises. Fourth,
signalization cost sharing by the City and the developer should a traffic signal
be warranted in the immediate vicinity in the future. An assessment agreement has..
been signed by the developer, based on the amount of traffic generated by the
project not to exceed 10 percent. With regard to landscaping, Mr. Larsen said the,
plan proposes to save significant amounts of existing vegetation along the
perimeter of the site and the landscaping plan conforms to Ordinance requirements.
Staff has requested that additional trees be added to the plan to provide
additional year around color and screening on the Vernon Avenue and the westerly
sides of the site. An important side issue for the proposed development has been
traffic on Vernon Avenue. At the time of preliminary approval, the Council asked
the issue be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee to get their
recommendations. Traffic safety concerns were considered by the Committee at its
meeting of April'14, 1987 and the Committee adopted the recommendations made by
the traffic consultant,. Benshoof and Associates, Inc., who was involved earlier in
the development plan. Mr. Larsen stated that the Community.Development and
Planning Commission heard the subject proposal at its meeting of April 1, 1987 and
recommended final rezoning and plat approval for the following reasons: 1) Design
development features.of the proposal, including number of dwelling units, building
design and materials, parking and building location are consistent with
preliminary approval, 2) With the exception of surface parking, the plans meet or
exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements; construction .of the additional 33 spaces
required by Ordinance is assured by a proof of parking agreement, 3) A Proof of
Parking Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney.has been signed by the
developer, 4) The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 5) An
Acceptable storm water drainage plan has been submitted, 6) Sidewalk along Vernon.
Avenue will be installed at the developer's expense, and 7) The developer has
agreed to participate in the cost of signalization if warranted in the future..
The Commission recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1)
Subdivision dedication based on a land value of.$330,000, 2) Executed Developer's
Agreement which has been executed, 3) Executed and recorded Proof of Parking
Agreement; the Agreement has been executed but not recorded, and 4) Executed
Assessment Agreement for cost of possible signalization. Mr. Larsen advised that
the proponent, Norman Bjornnes, was present to answer questions. Member Turner
asked if there had been any change as to setbacks and height relative to
surrounding properties. Mr. Larsen responded that the building has been moved
approximately 10 feet to the west and that the setback on that side is 40 feet to
the property line. As to building height, Mr. Larsen said it is almost identical
to the initial plan. The first floor of the building will be at an elevation of
923 feet which compares to an elevation of 945 feet for the driveway of Edina
Highland Villa apartments on Villa Way to the north and an elevation of about 950
feet for the homes on Duncraig Road to the west. Dave Getsch, 5233 Richwood
Drive, asked why when land is zoned for single family dwellings is it considered
for rezoning to multiple dwellings. He said it would jeopardize property values
of single family homes in the area and asked how dense this area was going to get.
He added that the comment was made that this project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan but that he felt the residents should be asked how they felt
about the use of this land. Member Richards explained that according to the
Comprehensive Plan this parcel has been suggested as multi - family development
since 1966. He said that at one time a request had been made for approval of a
seven - story, 175 unit apartment complex for the property which did not receive
final approval by the Council. He explained further that before the Comprehensive
Plan was adopted public hearings were held to solicit everyone's input as to how
vacant land should be designated for use and that subsequently the Plan has been
updated following public hearings. When the Plan was considered the Council
.looked at the City as a whole or at various quadrants as to how they would
develop. Even though it appears that the last vacant parcels are being developed
with multiple units, the,.entire timeframe of the Comprehensive Plan should be kept
in mind and the heavy concentration of single family detached residences that were
built during the years of Edina's growth and development. Member Turner commented
that in developing the Comprehensive Plan in 1980 we looked at small strip
commercial areas like this and said it is important to the City to protect the
single family homes near these commercial areas by limiting the expansion of these
commercial areas. So we said in the Comprehensive Plan that when there is an
opportunity for redevelopment in any of these types of commercial areas that we
ought to look at the redevelopment to.be housing rather.than additional commercial
which was felt would have a greater impact on single family homes than
multi - family housing. Member Richards added that back in 1980 when the
Comprehensive Plan process was unfolding comments where made that there was too
much density. The Council at that time went through a density reduction as part
of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to bring the densities down from the
1966 plan. Mr. Getsch asked why the Comprehensive Plan shows the subject property
-zoned as R -1 District if.that is not the intent for development. Member Richards
explained that all undeveloped.land is held in the R -1 District and is not rezoned
until the property.is ready to be developed-so that it forces the developer'to
come back to the Council and-hold yet a second series of- public hearings to give
all the citizens a chance to give input once again. Dr. Robert Fielden, 5209,
Duncraig Road, commented that this will affect everyone living the area in a
`detrimental way and will '`change the atmosphere of the area He said that the area
has developed as single.family homes and that is how it should stay. Bill
Mahoney,.5309,Ayrshire Boulevard, representing the Edina Highland Residents
Association, presented.a statement recommending that the Namron Corporation
development be denied.at this time and that an advisory referendum be held to get
input from the community regarding the issue of higher density. He added that the
Council should get a current reading from the people living in the area as to how
they feel about the density.,-Member Smith commented that he looked on the
Comprehensive Plan as a tool and not as a precise guideline that -has to be
followed. He said he shared their concerns and - concurred that the reasons people
want to move to Edina are because of the 'excellent school system and the fact that
it is.a single family community. He said he had walked the subject property and
had talked with residents living in the neighborhood and that he-was also aware.of
the traffic concerns of the neighborhood. He pointed out that the Namron project
Js not the only.contributing factor-to the traffic.but that-the whole Grandview
area is involved according to the traffic study that was made. Conner Schmid;
said that he was representing Wilma Smith, 5304 Glenbrae Circle and Mr./Mrs. L. J.
Jonason,'5300 Glenbrae Circle, who are closest to the proposed development. Mr.
Schmid said they feel they will be severely impacted by the loss.of natural
screening and natural topography,. that the density of the project would be an
abrupt change in the.character of the neighborhood and that there will be
increased traffic problems for the Highland residents exiting to Vernon from
Ayrshire. Jack Forrest, 5228 Duncraig Road, stated he was opposed.to the _project.
Robert Vaa, 5224 Duncraig Road, said that he was opposed to the high density
development because of the traffic safety issue and said it would put additional_
demand on police and fire services. It was also noted that letters of objection
had been received from C. S. McKissick, 5216 Duncraig Road and R. H. Rosch, 5248.
Richwood Drive. Norman Bjornnes, the developer, explained that the planning
process for the development began a long time ago and that they wanted to be as
sensitive to the site and the neighborhood as was possible.. He explained that.the
top of the building will not exceed the height of the existing trees. They have
attempted to save every tree on the site that they possibly can and have trimmed
all the trees outside of the construction zone. Privacy along the west side of
the site °was a major concern for both the neighbors and the people who will be
diving in the project. He added that they have agreed to add additional mature
trees if needed. The site is unique with severe topography and not easy to
develop. Mr. Bjornnes said they tried to create a minimal impact on traffic by
,adjusting the entrance and by adding a turn -off lane. With regard to the existinv
neignoornooa storm water run -o== pro D.
station to redirect some of the draini
run -off problem will be less than it :
percent of the cost of the traffic sib
called to get on the list for the pro;
continue to live in the City and do ni
their homes. He said the apartment ui
development will be one that they and
tax revenues in excess of $160,000 pei
proposed development is a significant
project and is significantly below wh:
said they have not asked for any subs:
they are building this project to be c
an asset to the neighborhood and the
the Council has asked as well as the
the design for minimum impact. Member
westerly and what the landscaping agre
the project, explained that when the
conceptual basis and it was moved due
have been moved further to the east bt
The building will be 400 feet from the
em, he said they will put in a pumping
ge in the area so that the storm water
s now. He said they have agreed to pay 10
nal. The vast majority of people who have
ect have been Edina residents who.want to
t want to buy a condominium after they sell
its will be first class units and the
the City can be proud of. It will produce
year. As to density, he noted that the
density down sizing from the Vernon Terrace
t the Zoning Ordinance allows.. Mr. Bjornnes
dies or tax increment from the City and that
wned for a long time. They feel it will be
ity and that they have done everything that
taff and Planning Commission to fine tune
Richards asked why the building was moved
ement requires. Nick Palaia, architect for
lan was first proposed it was done on a
to the nature of the dimensioning. It could
t that would have disturbed more vegetation.
west side to the nearest single family
house. As to the landscaping, Mr. Bjornnes said the Planning Department was
primarily concerned about the screening for the parking areas. They have a
formula for landscaping and based on that they said in the alternative plan they
wanted an additional number of trees shown indicating the size and species and
that this requirement is covered by the landscaping bond. Member Smith asked the
proponent what lead to the proposed density ratio of 19:1. Mr. Bjornnes responded
that a number of factors were involved, i.e. what the Zoning Ordinance allows, the
topography of the site, the existing vegetation, and what is economically
feasible. Member Smith referred to recommendations of the Community Development
and Planning Commission made at their meeting of July 30, 1986, with regard to: 1)
improving sight -lines at Ayrshire and Vernon, 2) taking traffic counts at
Ayrshire/Vernon, 3) reduction of the speed limit along Vernon Avenue and asked if
these have been acted upon. Mr. Hoffman said the City has taken steps to improve
the sight lines at Ayrshire /Vernon and that the City has requested Hennepin County
and MNDOT to perform a.speed limit analysis on Vernon Avenue and that the process
has again been started to request reduction of the speed limit. Mr. Hoffman
recalled that about three.years.ago the City asked for a speed reduction on Vernon
Avenue and that on the west end the speed limit was reduced from 40 to 30 mph but
that it was refused for the mid - section on Vernon. Avenue. In reference to
signalization,.Mr. Hoffman said that historically Vernon Avenue has had a lot of
review and that he would perceive that outside of the Jerry's Shopping Center area
that Hansen Road and Gleason Road would be.the next two likely locations that
would meet the warrants for signalization. Member Smith asked if the Planning
Commission had talked about a density ratio of 12:1 for the project. Mr. Larsen
said the- initial request was for 150 units.. Through the staff and the Planning
Commission the proponent was told to go back and make a reduction more in line .
with the apartment complex on-Villa Way. When the proponent came back with a
project more in line with the density of. the apartment complex on Villa Way the
Planning Commission felt they had performed and recommended approval of the
project. Member Kelly said she intended to vote no on the project for these
reasons: 1) that she was not satisfied with the traffic study that was done
because it did not consider other proposed projects along Vernon Avenue and that
the 10 percent traffic impact from the proposed project was too much, 2) that she
was concerned-about the impact on the neighborhood of this project together with
the impact of other projects along Vernon Avenue, 3) that she did not see a need
for additional apartment development in the City, 4) that she objected.to the .
possibility of additional parking for.the project be added in the future, 5) that
it will be more difficult for children crossing Vernon Avenue to get.to'Garden
Park in light of the fact that Division Park was closed several years ago, 6) that
Highlands School will be re- opened.for Edina students, many of whom will be
walkers, and that will add to the traffic congestion, and 7) that from a personal
commitment to maintain our Mission Statement objective which was to encourage and
protect single family housing she did not feel this type of development is
appropriate for the site. Member Smith commented that he also could not support
the project because: l) the project is not scaled down in density from the
neighboring projects, 2) that the traffic problem on Vernon Avenue has not been
adequately studied, and 3) that we need to stop and take a look at the other
projects being constructed or proposed for Vernon Avenue. Member Smith moved that
.it be referred back to the Community Development and Planning Commission. Member
Richards then offered a motion for approval of the proposal for these reasons: 1)
it has received staff support and the unanimous support of the Planning
Commission,.2) it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 3) -the storm water
drainage problem has been solved, 4) the sidewalk issue has been addressed, 5) the
traffic congestion /signalization problem on Vernon Avenue has been addressed, 6)
it is less than the maximum density allowed by the Zoning Ordinance and is
consistent with the density in the entire area, 7) the landscape bond will insure
that the City has input as to sizing and selection of landscaping to be put on the
property, 8) there is a buffer of 400 feet from the site to the nearest home which
is greater than the.Council has approved for multi - family units in the southwest.
quadrant, 9) that the property is being developed for residential as anticipated,
and that approval be subject to payment of a subdivision dedication fee of
$26,400. Member Smith noted that he had made a prior motion. Mayor Courtney
responded that if that was the intent he would call for a second to Member Smith's
motion. Member Kelly then seconded the motion made by Member Smith to refer the
matter back to the Planning Commission. Attorney Erickson commented that the
Council had granted preliminary approval of the project on a 4 to 1 vote with
conditions that have been met. The process has been to then bring the proposal
back for final approval which needs a 4 to l vote minimum for the rezoning of the
property. Where that vote is not likely to be obtained it has been the policy to
send it to the staff to prepare findings and facts for a decision by the Council
and the reasons for that decision so that there will be a sustainable argument
before any court. Mr. Erickson opined that if the Council is inclined to deny the
rezoning that staff be instructed to prepare the findings for the Council's review
and action at an upcoming meeting. He also advised that by statute plats that are
not acted upon within 120 days from the date of application are deemed approved.
Member Turner then said that she had intended to second the motion made by Member
Richards for these reasons: 1) the proposed land use is consistent with the.
Comprehensive Plan, 2) that a balanced land use including single family homes,
multi - family units, commercial and office areas are consistent with the City's
Mission Statement in maintaining Edina as a.premier community, 3) that the issues
identified at First Reading regarding storm water drainage, sidewalk along Vernon
and having the Traffic Safety Committee look at the traffic situation on Vernon
have been addressed: She said she agreed that we should again pursue with
Hennepin County the issue of speed reduction on Vernon Avenue. Member Turner
concluded that the reasons were not there for her to refer the matter back to the
Planning Commission. Member Richards commented that if this is referred back to
the Planning Commission that we should get their reasons for recommending approval
of the proposed project at 135 units and why it should not be less or more. Both
Members Smith.and Kelly concurred that the issue for the proposed property is
density. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion to refer
the matter back-to the Planning Commission.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
:FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS (7450 METRO BLVD)
APPROVED.. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on-,file.. Planner Larsen advised that the subject property is the former
warehouse distribution center for General Electric Company, located at 7.450 Metro
Boulevard, =and A s zoned PID- Planned Industrial District. The site is 7.78 acres
in size and is-developed with an office - warehouse building containing 114,249
square feet., The.proponent, Golden Valley Microwave Foods, has submitted a
request to allow the construction of an addition to the building containing 18,560
square .feet. 'The addition would provide freezer space and a new loading dock. In
.addition, the existing warehouse space would be converted to production and
warehouse space. The amount and location 'of office space would remain unchanged.
Mr. Larsen explained that.there are currently 90 parking spaces on the site.
Following the expansion and remodeling 239 spaces will be provided. The Zoning
Ordinance requires.parking.at one space per 400 square feet or the sum -of the
requirements for each individual use, whichever is greater. In this case, the sum
of the individual use yields 239 spaces and one-space per 400 square feet requires
306 spaces. Golden Valley Microwave Foods will initially have 35 -40 office
employees and three shifts of 50 employees each. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the..
.,employees
does not conform to Ordinance requirements for landscaping and
screening. The Community Development and Planning Commission recommended that the
landscaping be_ upgraded and the proponent has subsequently submitted a revised
landscape plan which does conform to the.Ordinance and will.increase perimeter
plantings and provide a visual buffer on the east side. The parking.to building
- setback along portions of the north side of the building fail to provide the
required 10 foot setback.. The non- conforming five foot setback is proposed to
remain following.the remodeling and addition. Mr. Larsen pointed out that at its
current facility on. Washington Avenue the plant discharges wastes into. the
sanitary sewer system which at times cause a blockage of the system. The
proponent has submitted plans for a system at the new site which is intended to
eliminate this problem. The plans have been reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer. The request was heard by the Community Development and Planning
Commission at its meeting of April 1, 1987 and approval of the final development
plan was recommended based on the following: 1) the proposal is a good re -use of
the building, 2).the parking quantity variance should be granted because more than
enough parking is provided to allow for initial occupancy and growth, and 3) the
requested five foot building to parking setback variance should be granted.
Approval was recommended conditioned on: a) final approval of the sewage treatment
plan by City Engineer, and b) painting the existing warehouse to match the new
addition. Member Smith asked what assurances the City will have that there will
be no problem with the sewage. Joe'Niedermeyer, plant engineer for Golden Valley.
Microwave Foods, . explained that the problem has been the oil used for popcorn and
the emulsifying of detergents in the sewer which causes the blockage. The
proposed plan would provide a miniature sewer treatment plant in.their food
processing plant which would be.a dedicated,system and which will dispose of the
solid wastes. The solid wastes will be hauled from the property once a day. No
further comment or objection being heard, Member Smith introduced the following
resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) final approval of the sewage
treatment plan by the City Engineer and ongoing monitoring thereof pursuant to a
signed recordable agreement acceptable to the City and 2) painting of the existing
warehouse to match the new addition:
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL
FOR GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final
Development Plan for Golden Valley Microwave Foods, 7450 Metro Boulevard,
presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is
hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR ARENSEON ACRES PARK. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented_
the request for a Conditional Use Permit for Arneson Acres Park generally located
south of West 70th Street and.west of West Shore Drive. He advised that the
Zoning Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for publicly owned civic and
cultural buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The Edina .Park and Recreation
Department has applied for a permit to allow the renovation and expansion of the
Arneson home to house the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Garden Council.
Mr. Larsen said that a master plan for development of Arneson Acres Park has been
drafted which explains the history and purpose of the groups as well as the
intended use of the park buildings and grounds. It also explains the proposed
funding for park development. The master plan has received approval by the Edina
Park Board and has also been presented to the City Council on an informational
basis. Mr. Larsen pointed out that development of the existing house as a
headquarters for the two groups would occur in two phases. Phase I would start
immediately and would involve remodeling within the existing structure to create
meeting rooms, storage space, work and exhibit spaces. Phase II which is planned
for 1988 would expand the house by 1,750 square feet. Total area in the house
would be 6;500 square feet following the expansion. The addition would provide
more office,.exhibit and storage space. Other elements of the park master plan
include development of formal gardens, an extensive pathway system, a water
feature, expanded parking and construction of anew maintenance garage and
additional greenhouse. Mr. Larsen said the request for the Conditional Use Permit
was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of
April 1, 1987 and approval was recommended. John Rogan, 4720 West 70th Street,
Asked if the - addition would be an additional building and if there would be
another entrance off West 70th Street. Mr. Larsen responded that the addition
would be made to the existing house and that there would be only the one entrance .
to the park. Joseph Florenzano,.4712 West-70th Street, reiterated his concerns
that he had submitted by letter regarding 1) restrictive covenants on the
property, 2) additional traffic and parking problems, 3) restrictions to-be placed
on.the use of the property, and 4) the future use or expansion planned for the
property. Mr..Florenzano said he was opposed to granting the Conditional Use
Permit. Bob.Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, responded that he was not
aware of any restrictions placed on the property when it was donated to the City
in 1969. Manager Rosland explained the property was donated to the City as a life
estate and that Mr. Arneson resided in the home on the property until his death in
1982. He said Mr. Arnesons's hope for this property was that it would have a
formal garden area which .would bring people into the park. It is expected that
additional traffic will be minimal and if additional parking is needed the master
plan provides for that. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, presented
a graphic of the park master plan and explained the features of the park. With
regard to the anticipated use.of the property, Manager Rosland explained that the
Historical Society is a small active organization that has a large collection.
They meet once a month and are looking for space so that their collection can be
open to public viewing. The Garden Council meets once a month. Each spring the.
Garden Council organizes the nine Garden Clubs to order and plant seeds for the 54
gardens that are planted in the community. The City.may use the house for
additional meetings which would be limited. Ruth Johnson, Garden Council member,
said that she was opposed to the.shared use of the house and that she felt Mr.
Arneson had intended it to be used solely by the Garden Council. Ronald Rich,
7008 West Short Drive, said he was concerned how this would impact the
neighborhood and.that a decision should be postponed until the neighbors could
have a chance to look at the proposal for the park. Member Richards asked if
notices had been mailed to the neighborhood and suggested that a meeting be held,
so that the neighbors could have an opportunity to be heard and then take whatever
action is required. Mr. Kojetin said that the master plan for the park has not
been presented to neighborhood as no long range plan for development of the park
has been adopted. Present policy is that when a park is scheduled for development
-hearings are held to get neighborhood input. He said that the request before the
Council is for a Conditional Use Permit for the Arneson house only. Mr. Larsen
explained that a sign was placed on West 70th Street 10 days prior to the hearing
by the Planning Commission and that no mailed notice or publication other than the
sign is: required by statute. Mailed notices of the public hearing by the Council
was mailed to all residences within 500 feet of the entire perimeter of the site
10 days prior, advising that a Conditional Use Permit had been applied for to
allow expansion of the building and use by the Edina Historical.Society and the
Edina Garden Council. Member Smith asked what problems would be created by
delaying a decision by the Council on the permit. Member Kelly said that Phase II
(building expansion) has been targeted as a goal of the 1988 Centennial to raise
$250,000 and that the Centennial Commission is ready to proceed with that
challenge upon Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit and that for this
reason a decision should not be delayed. Fred Jaeger, 7100 West Short.Drive
stated that he had not received notice nor had his neighbors to the north. Jim
Coppick, 7024 West Drive, also questioned whether there were restrictive covenants
on the property and asked about the park plan. Mr. Kojetin then reviewed the
plans for renovation of the Arneson house and master plan for the park and Foster
Dunwiddie, architect, showed and reviewed the plans for the expansion. There
being no further public comment, Member Smith commented that the City Attorney had
advised the Council that there were no restrictive covenants on the property, that
the proposal is for a shared use that will benefit two active civic organizations,
that the addition will not be built unless the funds are raised through donations
which may possibly be solicited by the Centennial Commission, that the Historical
Society has a valuable collection which is presently being stored under not the
best conditions, and that completion of the master park plan will be an asset to
the City. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR ARNESON ACRES PARK
WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance)
have been met; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance
No. 825 have been satisfied;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a
Conditional Use Permit to the City of Edina for Arneson Acres Park for building
expansion and use by the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Garden Council.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards
Resolution adopted.
Member Richards commented that he voted no because he felt there should be a more
thorough discussion on the subject.
FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR EVANSON ADDITION. Planner Larsen advised that the subject.
property is generally located north of West 78th Street and east of March Road.
He recalled that preliminary plat approval had been granted by the Council; at its
meeting of March 16, 1987. The subdivision request would create one new buildable
lot. The existing home. on the southerly lot would be removed and the existing
home on the northerly portion of the property would remain. Staff would recommend
final plat approval subject to.payment of a subdivision dedication.fee based on a
land value of $40,000. Mr. Larsen said that the proponent, John Laurent, was
present to answer any questions. No comment or objection being heard, Member
Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption;_ subject to,
payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $3,200.00:
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR
EVANSON ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
certain plat entitled " EVANSON ADDITION ", platted by Roger C. Evanson and Marilyn
B. Evanson, husband and wife, and Preferred Mortgage Corporation, a Minnesota
corporation, and First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B., a United States corporation
and John L. Laurent and Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented
at the _regular meeting of the.City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is hereby
granted final :plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
SKATE BOARD RAMPS TO REGULATED AS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. Mayor Courtney reiterated
his opposition to skate board ramps because of their potential danger, appearance
and attraction for children. Planner Larsen recalled that the Council had
discussed the regulation of skate board ramps at their meeting of April 6, 1987
and had directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance for consideration. Prior to
that regulation of skate board ramps was initially considered when the Council was
reviewing controls.of "Nuisances ". At that time staff suggested a minimum setback
of 50 feet from all lot lines for ramps which would effectively prohibit ramps on
all but extremely large lots. The Council considered and rejected that approach.
Subsequently, staff has been attempting to find out if other communities have
established specific regulations for skate board ramps but have been unable to
find any. Mr. Larsen explained that under existing rules we would treat skate
board ramps as accessory structures. Ramps could be located in the rear yard only
and would need to provide at least a 5 foot setback from an interior side or rear
lot line. Ramps would be included in the 25 percent lot coverage calculation. He
noted that tennis courts are subject to these same setback requirements but are
not included in lot coverage. The Zoning Ordinance requires that swimming pools
provide a minimum setback of 10 feet from side and rear property lines. In
addition, Ordinance No. 434 requires that pools be enclosed by a non - climbable
fence at least 4 feet in height. The increased setback and fencing requirements
may be appropriate for skate board ramps. Fencing could help control unauthorized
access and may also be used to provide a visual screen. Mr. Larsen presented a
draft amendment to the.Zoning Ordinance which would establish these controls for
skate board ramps. The ordinance amendment would regulate ramps which are over
120 square feet in area and would limit height to 8 feet. It was noted that the
120 square foot threshold is the point at which a building permit is required for
an accessory structure. Mr. Larsen said another option would be to prohibit skate
board ramps entirely. A prohibition would have to promote the health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community. It would also need to be shown as
reasonable and free from arbitrariness and discrimination. He added that certain
construction techniques may help to reduce noise levels generated by ramp use,
i.e. heavier skating surface and insulation. Hours of use could also be limited
to prevent nighttime disturbance. Mr. Larsen summarized the options as follows:
1) Do nothing - skateboard ramps would be subject to a 5 foot setback requirement
and would be included in lot coverage, 2) Adopt special requirements for skate
board ramps as per draft ordinance amendment and include ramps in lot coverage,
and 3) Ban skate board ramps - must be justified and may be subject to court
challenge. Member Turner commented that she liked Option 2 because it is
consistent with how we regulate other attractive nuisances and because it defines
skate board ramps covered by the proposed restrictions as over 120 square feet in
area so that it does not eliminate the small ramps. Member Turner moved that
First Reading of the ordinance amendment as presented be scheduled. Motion was
seconded by Member. Kelly. Member Smith commented that there are other attractive
nuisances such as trampolines which are not regulated and that if other
communities are not regulating skate board ramps why should we.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Richards,,Smith .
Mr. Larsen advised the Council that the draft ordinance would amend the Zoning
Ordinance.which would require a favorable 4/5 vote by the Council. Member
Richards.said he did not intend to change his vote and questioned going through
the.process for First Reading if it would not receive the required favorable vote.
Member Turner then moved for reconsideration of the motion, seconded by Member
Kelly.
Ayes:. Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays Kelly
Member Smith then moved adoption of Option 1 - Skate board ramps would be subject
to a 5.foot setback requirement and would be included in lot coverage. Motion was
seconded by Member Richards.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards,. Smith, Turner
Nays: Courtney
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE N0: 825 -A18 CONTINUED TO 5/4/87. Manager Rosland
stated that staff would recommend First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A18 To Allow
Bagged Leaves and Grass on the Curb-for Pick -up in the Morningside area be
continued to May 4, 1987: because it would amend the Zoning Ordinance which
requires published notice prior to First Reading. Motion of Member Kelly was
.seconded by Member Turner to continue First Reading of Ordinance No. 825- A18.to
May 4, 1987.
Ayes:. Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
(Member Kelly left the meeting at this point.)
BID AWARDED FOR CITY HALL CARPETING. Manager Rosland presented tabulation of bids
for approximately 1,400 square yards of carpeting for City Hall showing Merit
Supply at $6.99 per square yard, Noah Williams Associates, Inc. at $7.70 per
square yard and Fred G. Anderson at $9.27 per square yard. Staff would recommend
award of bid to Noah Williams Associates, Inc. Although the bid submitted by
Merit Supply was lower, upon having the carpet analyzed by an expert from Dayton's
Commercial Interiors, Inc., it was determined that the carpet bid by Merit Supply
did not meet the yarn specifications. Further, Merit Supply was unable to supply
the color specified. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith for
award of bid for carpeting for City Hall to Noah Williams Associates, Inc. at
$7.70 per square yard.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR RECYCLING AND PARK MAINTENANCE TRUCK BODY. Motion was made by
Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Recycling and Park
maintenance truck to recommended low bidder, LaHass Manufacturing and Sales at
$7,973.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR SENIOR CITIZENS BUS.. Motion was made by Member Kelly and
seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for one 10 passenger senior citizens
bus to recommended low bidder, Tillson Bus & Equipment Company, at $28,238.00 with
trade -in.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON VAN. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by
Member Turner for award of bid for a 1987 one ton van to recommended low bidder,
Suburban Chevrolet at $11,936.29.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC WEED CONTROL PROGRAM - INDIANHEAD LAKE. Motion was made
by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for the 1987
Aquatic Weed Control Program for Indianhead Lake to sole bidder, Clean Flo
Laboratories at $5,071.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 14 1987 APPROVED. There being no
requests under Section A or Section B for approval or denial, motion of Member
Smith was seconded by Member,Turner to approve the Traffic Safety Committee
Minutes of April 14, 1987, "acknowledging Section C of the minutes.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: None
Motion carried.
UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY. Member Turner called the Council's
attention to a notice of a public meeting for the I -494 Corridor Study on
Wednesday, May 6, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina Community Center Auditorium for
the purpose of discussing potential transportation improvements in the I -494
corridor. She urged the members to attend the public information meeting. Member
Turner said that prior to that meeting, on Monday, May 4 at the regular Council
Meeting, the consultant for the study, Dick Wolsfeld of BRW, will make a
presentation to the Edina Council to help them understand where the study is at
this point and to ask questions. Engineer Hoffman added that 15 developers are
being asked to attend `a breakfast meeting on Friday, April 24, 1987 to let them
know what is going on and the impacts of car pooling, ramp control, etc. and to
keep the trip levels'at a certain volume for future developments. Member Smith.
requested that any reading materials be given to the Council in advance.of the May
4 meeting. Mr.. Hoffman said that any such information will be placed in the
Council packets.. No action was taken.
(Member.Kelly returned to the meeting at this point.)
FINAL PLAN APPROVED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT FRANCE AV AND MINNESOTA DR. Engineer
Hoffman advised that plans for installation of a traffic signal at the France
Avenue (CASH 17) and Minnesota Drive.(West 77th Street) intersection.have been
prepared. Hennepin County and the City of Bloomington have requested the City's
participation in this project.. The normal participation split for a. traffic
signal installation -is 25% county and 75% local. In this case, the signal is on
the border of Edina and Bloomington which would result in a cost split of 37.5%
for each city. Mr. Hoffman explained that this signal installation is important
to the City of Edina for the upcoming development of the Hedberg property and for
improved access to the Edinborough project. Mr. Hoffman presented the following
estimated cost .figure totals: Bloomington $38,000.00, Edina $34,200.00 and
Hennepin County $22,800.00. Additionally, Bloomington and Hennepin County will
absorb all future maintenance costs for the signal. Staff would recommend that
the Council take the following action: A) Final plan approval of the traffic
signal authorization, B). Resolution-authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign the
agreement specifying the cost participation of 37.5% of the project, and C)
Resolution authorizing use of Municipal State Aid Funds on a county road (France
Avenue) up to $35,000.00 for Edina's share of the costs involved. A discussion
developed as to.the possibility of assessing part of Edina's share of the cost to
the Edinborough project and to the proposed Hedberg project because those projects
help generate the traffic for the signal. Member Richards commented that it does
not.make sense to assess for this cost when we have the Municipal State Aid Funds
which are there for that purpose and can only be used on the Municipal State Aid
system. Attorney Erickson stated that the theory of assessment is that the value
is increased by the amount of the assessment and the City would have to prove that
the Edinborough and Hedberg projects were increased in value. Member Turner then
introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the planned traffic signal construction of France Avenue at Minnesota
Drive is a cooperative project involving Hennepin County and the cities of
Bloomington and Edina; and
WHEREAS,,the Construction Plan for signalization of France Avenue at Minnesota
Drive, C.P. 8614, S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -01, 120- 171 -01, has been prepared and
presented to the City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Plan be in all things approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Member Smith introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Mayor and City
Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement with Hennepin
County and the City of Bloomington to provide for the participation by Edina of
thirty seven and one -half percent of the cost of the traffic signal construction
of France Avenue at Minnesota Drive.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to
participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17
within the limits of said municipality, and
WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of
Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120- 020 -21;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal
State Aid Street Funds the sum of $35,000.00 to apply toward the construction of
said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this
authorization.
Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Courtney
Nays: Kelly,. Richards
Resolutions adopted.
SPRINKLING BAN DISCUSSED: PENALTIES APPROVED. Manager Rosland recalled that at
its last meeting the Council had discussed the odd /even lawn sprinkling ordinance
and that the penalty for violation was a misdemeanor which involved a court
appearance. -Staff has looked_ at an ordinance amendment which would provide a-
schedule of fines that would eliminate much of the prosecuting time spent by the
-City legal staff. Staff would recommend for court approval a.fine of $40.00 for
the first offense, $100.00 maximum for the second offense (petty misdemeanor) and
the third violation within a 12 -month period would be a misdemeanor (maximum of
$700.00 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days plus prosecution costs) which would
require a court appearance. Engineer Hoffman explained that the odd /even day
sprinkling ordinance has been in- effect since 1981 and that the last time this was
discussed.was in 1983 which also was a very dry year. In anticipation of a very
dry year in 1987 strict enforcement is recommended. He stated that if the
odd /even sprinkling ordinance were strictly adhered to there would be no potential
water problem. Mr. Hoffman said a warning ticket would be issued the first time a
violation is observed and -a record would be kept as to the location and on any
'following violation the fine schedule would go into effect. A mailed notice.would
be sent to all residences advising of the odd /even sprinkling ordinance and the
penalties for violation. Member Smith suggested that the mailed notice beiin a
format that would catch the attention of.the reader. Member Smith moved approval
of the fine schedule for violation of the sprinkling ordinance as follows: 1)
$40.00 for the first offense, 2) $100.00 maximum for the second offense, and 3) ,
misdemeanor penalty for the third offense within 12 months, with mailed notice to
the citizens and an effective date of April 21, 1987. Motion was seconded by
Member Kelly.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICES CONTRACT DISCUSSED - CONTRACT TO BE RENEGOTIATED FOR
1988 AND 1989. Manager Rosland referred to a memorandum prepared by David Velde,
City Sanitarian, with regard to the.1988 -89 Public.Health Nursing Services
Contract. Mr. Velde had advised that the Edina Community Health Services Advisory
Committee has been studying the options available to the City of Edina for the
delivery of personal public health nursing services to Edina residents for
calendar years 1988 and 1989. The Committee recommended that the Council
renegotiate a contract with the Bloomington Division of Public Health for public
health nursing services for 1988 and 1989; that the cost should not exceed a 4%
increase for each year of the contract, and that if the City does not reach such
agreement with Bloomington that it should seek competitive bids for this contract.
Virginia McCollister, member of the Committee, stated that the Bloomington
Division of Public Health has contracted for a number of years to provide public
health nursing services to Edina. During the past year the Committee has looked
at their services very carefully and the general consensus of the Committee is
that Edina is served well and the Committee was impressed by the range of public
health services provided. The Committee decided they should initiate a,systematic
evaluation strategy to determine both the appropriateness of the services
delivered through the contract and the clients' reaction to those services. This
evaluation process will be an important tool for monitoring contractor performance
and will also serve as a tool for reviewing future bid proposals. Mrs.
McCollister said that if we have to contract with a hospital based home health
care agency the various services will be subcontracted and many people have
difficulty in receiving services from various agencies. There also is the danger
of loss of continuity and hidden costs in the quality of those services. The
Committee felt that in order to maintain the present service level that the
Council should consider renegotiation and if not possible to reach an agreement
with Bloomington then to go to an opening bidding process. Member Smith asked if
the Committee has talked to the Edina School District regarding their health
nursing needs and trying to combine their needs with the City's. Mrs. McCollister
said that Bloomington does contract with the School currently for the screening
process. Member Smith asked if a 4% increase per year for the contract is
realistic. Manager Rosland said that in the past increases have ranged from 3% to
5 %. Member Turner asked if the Committee currently does an evaluation.
Mrs. McCollister said that, given the state of health care, this is one of their
concerns and that they do not now have a tool to evaluate bids but would like to
develop one to be used in the future. Member Smith asked if Bloomington is
developing an educational program regarding AIDS that could be available to the
Edina community as part of the total public health picture. Mr. Velde said that
Hennepin County Public Health Department has a program that addresses AIDS but
that he was not aware of anything being worked on through Bloomington. Member
Smith then moved that staff be directed to renegotiate a contract with the
Bloomington Division of Public Health for public health nursing services for 1988
and 1989, the cost not to exceed a 4% increase for each year of the contract and
if the City does not reach such agreement with Bloomington that it seek
competitive bids for the contract. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
RECAP OF MARCH 21, 1987 COUNCIL /STAFF WORKSHOP DISCUSSED. Member Turner called
the Council's attention to a summary of the March 21, 1987 Council /Staff workshop,
drafted by Mr. Hughes, which lists in concise form the issues and goals which were
identified and discussed. She said the next step in the process will be the
drafting of a work program to address and implement these goals. The work program
will be prepared by staff and brought back to the Council at its meeting of
June 15. The Council members informally approved the summary as presented.
Because of the.late hour, Member. Turner suggested that the Council delay the
discussion_ on Council responsibilities until the next meeting. Member Smith asked
about the progress on.the brochure to be available for the public at Council .
meetings. Manager Rosland said that a first draft has prepared, that some changes
are being made and that the Council will see it before it is printed.
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING HEDBERG PROPERTY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 12. Manager
Rosland advised that the developers for the Hedberg property would like to meet
with the Council,:'the Community Development and Planning Commission and the Park
Board to go over their concept plans for the property. This would be an informal
meeting "only and would allow input to the developers. The date suggested is
..May 12, 1987 at 5:00-p.m. at Braemar Clubhouse. Motion of Member Turner was
seconded by Member Kelly to hold a special'Council Meeting on May 12, 1987. at 5:00
p.m:.at.Braemar Clubhouse with the developers of the Hedberg property and to
invite the Community- Development and Planning Commission and the Edina Park Board
to also attend.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried. -
FEES AND OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES APPROVED FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK. 'Manager Rosland
called the Council's attention to the Edina Park Board Minutes of April 14, 1987
and the Board's recommendations for Council action regarding Edinborough Park fees
-and charges and operational guidelines. He explained that in developing the fees
and charges staff looked at what other public facilities charge throughout the
metropolitan area and in the City's other public facilities. He noted that a
combination pass.will be available which can be used at both the Municipal Pool
and the Edinborough Pool.. Because the park is new and there is no operational..
experience, Mr. Rosland said the fees and charges may have.to be adjusted later on
so that the park itself does not become a burden to our ad valorem tax structure.
Member Turner said that the information on the swimming pool passes was unclear.
Mr. Rosland responded that it would be restated to clear up any confusion. Member
Kelly moved approval of the proposed fees and charges and the operational
guidelines for Edinborough Park as recommended in the Park Board Minutes of April
14, 1987. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Following some discussion, Mayor
Courtney called the question:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,. Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT - LOT 1. BLOCK 1 WINSOR
ADDITION. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to adopt the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined, after receipt of the petition of the owners
of land affected thereby, that the following described easement for utility
purposes-should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of
Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
The North 5.00 feet of Lot-1, Block 1, WINSOR ADDITION
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks,.in.the Edina
Sun- Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section
412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
IN THE CITY -OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on
May 18, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the
proposed vacation of the following easement for utility purposes:
The North 5.00 feet:of Lot 1, Block 1, WINSOR ADDITION
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area
of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling
electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains,
and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue
maintaining the same -or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof
vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the
purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or
or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon
the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
:. Motion carried.on rollcall vote, five ayes.
LEGISLATION REGARDING WINE IN GROCERY STORES DISCUSSED. Member.Turner advised
that the proposed legislation to allow the sale of wine in grocery stores is
.moving through the House of Representatives. She recalled that at one time the
Council had taken an active position against that legislation, mainly on the.issue
of control. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption, directing that a copy of the resolution be sent to our legislators:
RESOLUTION
BE IS RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby
expresses its opposition to H.F. 1342/S.F. 1302 which would allow the sale of wine
in grocery stores.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council urges its legislators to oppose this
legislation.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. ,
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
.Resolution adopted.
ANNUAL REPORT OF POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCUSSED.. Member Smith.complimented the
Police Department.on.their Annual Report and asked if there was some way.that it
could be sent out to the citizens. He suggested that possibly funds could be
raised privately for such a mailing. No action was taken.
JOINT COUNCIL /SCHOOL BOARD MEETING DRAFT AGENDA DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland
reported that he has been in contact with Dr. Smyth Superintendent of Schools and
Sara Jones, Chair of.the School Board, regarding the agenda for the joint
Council /School Board meeting scheduled for Monday, May 11 at 8:00 p.m. A
tentative agenda has.been drafted as follows: 1) Community Services-Task Force
Report., 2) School staff report on facilities and projections, 3) City staff report
on housing and population projections, 4) Community Advisory Board needs
assessment,. and 5) General discussion. The Council briefly discussed the agenda
and informally gave their approval.
I.A.F.F. 1275 CONTRACT DISPUTES NOTED. Manager Rosland called the Council's
attention to a memorandum from John F. Maloney, President, I.A.F.F. 1275, in which
he stated that there have been an excessive number of contract disputes during the
last five months. Mr. Rosland explained that some of the issues in dispute are .
cutting back on overtime, minimum callback and assigned acting officer. He said
this will most likely go through negotiation and then arbitration. No formal
action was taken.
ALL VOLUNTEERS AWARDS RECEPTION NOTED. Mayor Courtney reminded the Council
Members of the All Volunteers Awards Reception scheduled for Tuesday, May 28, 1987
at 5:00 p.m. at the Braemar Clubhouse and urged the Council to attend.
BOND REFUNDING UPDATE GIVEN: HEARING DATE SET. Manager Rosland advised that since
bond refunding was discussed.by the Council at their April 6, 1987 meeting and
staff was directed to proceed with the advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment
Bonds, that interest rates have taken a sharp increase and that the amount of
savings originally projected has been substantially reduced. Staff would
recommend that a hearing date be set for May 4, 1987 on the issuance of General.
Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds so that the City would be in a position
to respond to the bond market when and if interest rates drop to achieve the
amount of savings originally projected. Currently, the amount of present value
savings that could be expected under current market conditions has dropped to
about $230,000. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved
adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as
follows:
1. The City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,
dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000 (the
"Series 1985 Bonds "). It has been proposed that the City issue its general
obligation tax increment,.refunding bonds (the "Refunding Bonds ") in order to
refund in advance of their - maturity all or a portion of the Series 1985 Bonds.
Pursuant to Section 1313(b)(3) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 in order for the
interest on the Refunding Bonds to be exempt from.federal income taxation it is
necessary for the City Council to hold a public hearing on the issuance of the
Refunding Bonds within one year prior to the date of issuance of the Refunding
Bonds.
2. A public hearing on the proposal that the City issue the Refunding Bonds is
hereby called and shall be held by this Council on May 4, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. The
actions of the staff of the.City in causing a notice of the public hearing to be
published in the Edina Sun - Current is hereby ratified and confirmed and the form
of such notice of public hearing is hereby approved.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner for
payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 4/20/87: General Fund
$296,192.87, Art Center $2;076.83, Golf Course Fund $12,740.65, Recreation Center
Fund $2,517.56, Utility Fund $15,778.85, Liquor Dispensary Fund $80,175.03,
Construction Fund $74.00`, Total $409,555.79; and for confirmation of payment,of
the following.claims dated 3/31/87: General Fund $1,205,663:22, Art Center
$1,042.58; Swimming Pool Fund $91.54, Golf Course Fund $4,562.37, Recreation
Center Fund $9,532.75, Gun Range Fund $98.38, Utility Fund $18,127.61, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $241,234.57, Total $1,480.353.02.
Motion carried.on rollcall vote, five ayes.
LOCATION MAPIII'
IN
WS
LOT DIVIS10 ME
IN
NUMBER LD -87 -3
L O C A T 10 N 6820 Cheyenne Circle
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
\ LD -87 -3
Generally Located:
Burton McGlynn
6820 Cheyenne Circle
North west of Valley View Road and
south of Cheyenne Circle.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the applicant's property
is currently developed with a single family-dwelling unit. The
property is essentially landlocked, and therefore is
non - conforming. Access to the site is gained by a shared
driveway entering from Valley View Road. The driveway is narrow
and difficult to negotiate because of the steep grade.
Mr. Larsen added the applicant desires to obtain a 851
square foot parcel from the adjacent neighbor to the northeast.
Refer to survey. By obtaining this parcel, access to the
applicants home would be improved by entering from Cheyenne
Circle. Furthermore, the non - conforming status of the property
would be eliminated as 50 feet of frontage would be realized on
Cheyenne Circle. Both the applicant's property and the adjacent
property would maintain conforming setbacks to the dwellings.
Lot areas of the parcels would remain consistent with those in
the surrounding area.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval as
presented.
The proponent, Mr. McGlynn was present.
Mr. Bailey moved for approval. Mrs. Shaw seconded the
motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
APRIL 29, 1987
LD -87 -3 Burton McGlynn
6828 Cheyenne Circle
Generally Located: North west of Valley View Road and
south of Cheyenne Circle.
The applicant's property is currently developed with a
single family dwelling unit. The property is essentially
landlocked, and therefore is non - conforming. Access to the site
is gained by a shared driveway entering from Valley View Road.
The driveway is narrow and difficult to negotiate because of the
steep grade.
The applicant desires to obtain a 851 square foot parcel
from the adjacent neighbor to the northeast. Refer to survey.
By obtaining this parcel, access to the applicants home would be
improved by entering from Cheyenne Circle. Furthermore, the
non - conforming status of the property would be eliminated as 50
feet of frontage would be realized on Cheyenne Circle. Both the
applicant's property and the adjacent property would maintain
conforming setbacks to the dwellings. Lot areas of the parcels
would remain consistent with those in the surrounding area.
Staff recommends approval as presented.
,ERTIFICATE UF SUP-)VE�-
rz
�C—
Z5. .� 4
/ / Irvo�e�r�► -aFno Ca�s�i
Ty 7,66
240
LOT
• / -S. F N. 33.0 • .
i
1 _tip
CI
ti
�2
f Fro me
CP 6900 •,s,
o
• t1
/ Y
1
�r
0
K
s�
�� Nv�
JOHN E. CARD USE
C
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST and Lot 1, Block 1, INDIANHEAD LAKE
VIEW ADDITION; and
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said
tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called
"Parcels ") described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST, except that part of Lot 1, Block 3,
INDIANHEAD CREST, lying Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on
the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly
of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the Northeasterly
line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly of said Northwest
corner of said Lot 1
and
Lot 1, Block 1, INDIANHEAD LAKE VIEW ADDITION, and that part of Lot 1,
Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST, lying Northwesterly of a line drawn from a
point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet South
easterly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the North-
easterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly of said
Northwest corner of said Lot 1;
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1987.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 4th, 1987 and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1987.
City Clerk
V.A.1 & 2
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A18
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B(2)
OF SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 825
Fi
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Repealer. Paragraph B(2) of Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 825
is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
SECTION 7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRICTS EXCEPT AS
OTHERWISE STATED
A. General. No building or structure shall be erected, constructed
or placed on any property in the City, and no building or structure or
property in the City shall be used for any purpose, unless in full
compliance with the restrictions and requirements of this ordinance and
other applicable ordinances of the City.
B. Trash Storaae.
1. All Properties Except. Single Dwelling Unit and Double
Dwelling Unit Buildings. All solid waste material, debris, refuse,
garbage or similar material shall be kept within closed containers
designed for such purpose. Said containers shall not be located in
the front yard and shall be completely screened from view from all
lot lines and streets.
2. Single Dwelling Unit and Double Dwelling Unit Buildings.
All solid waste material, debris, refuse, garbage or similar material
shall be kept within closed containers designed for such purpose.
Said containers shall not be located in the front yard and shall not
be visible from the front lot line.
C. Dwelling Units Prohibited in Accessory Buildings, Temporary
10 Buildings, Trailers and Recreational Vehicles. No accessory building,
temporary building, trailer or recreational vehicle in any district shall
be used for a dwelling unit or units, except for accessory buildings
which are specifically allowed for residential use by this ordinance.
D. Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use.
1. Customary home occupations which are permitted as an
accessory use by this ordinance shall comply with the following
conditions:
(a) only the residents of the dwellling unit are employed
on the lot or within the dwelling unit;
(b) no exterior structural modifications are. made to
change the residential character and appearance of the lot or
any buildings or structures on the lot;
(c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities,
except parking, shall occur;
(d) no signs of any ::ind shall be used to identify the use;
(e) all parking demands generated by the use shall be
accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway
7 -1
ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711
TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES
ON THE CURB ON A TEMPORARY BASIS
FOR A PORTION OF NORTHEAST EDINA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting
"(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4 and by adding a new paragraph
"(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows:
"(b) Within that portion of the City located north of Sunnyside Road
and east of Wooddale Avenue, grass clippings and leaves suitable for
composting may be placed next to the street or curb for pickup provided
that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored
within a plastic bag designed for such a purpose, and ii) placed at
the curb no more than 12 hours prior to the scheduled pickup."
Sec. 2. The provision of Sec. 4(b) of this Ordinance No. 711 shall
automatically cease and be of no further effect on December 1, 1987.
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage
and publication, but not earlier than August 1, 1987.
IV.A.1.
IV. A.2.
RESPONSES TO MAILED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE CURBSIDE PICK -UP OF
BAGGED LEAVES AND GRASS CLIPPINGS.
1
Aerial view from Pagef
U77 Le 55 Ud'
C) eYS d Vr;c :z._ �.:.
Ye, d Crlon ror
le Y
POST
b 20,f
S I teY ale THe �. .
oY the �� 1/�e �i IN
har _ he y SAO o �rogra
-r' W e Led y
e S e e ✓�' �'"�
b 7- S
S i c K 7- e S i S d � 0� GU , J`0 /! .
Ej
A� rv.W p �.� M a N7,q
- \ re
363314 d, Ye S KJ e n rd %" �/ i �e r �1 a nt.
��. ze
a-14 L 4,
Ur
�- - -- {
D-
�Llvrtc
a� d.a-e-
V
V �!\/ J�3Sr `t It �i . •.' _• � ,mar. 'sr u
-� �� �
� Gr-� � � .TlGP�GI�' Q'Lt�L AG� - -
�. � 7)
.� - ,
�` �.
�-�
�f
- -- -� -- -- - -�. _ =_ - -- - - _ - -- - - -� - - -- - _I
- - ... -- - - --_ _ - - I
_,
..
01AAA1. SCHOFFMAN
7 ALDEN DRIVE
I NNEAPOL[S, MN. 55416
C =Ir
All
Mrs H M Frederickson
4235 Alden Dr
Minneapolis MN 55416
i
i
"wtn f. Larsen i
�I 4018 West 44
Edina, I1N 55424
--._ O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina
DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves.
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
C / ,
N O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina -
DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
°��oej
Mrs. Lawrence H. Armstrong
1229 West Fora- Fourth Street
Edina, \1\ 55424
4229 West 44th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
April 30, 198?
City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
Gentlemen:
I am firmly opposed to amending the Zoning Ordi-
nancean the Nuisance Ordinance to allow the
pick -up of leaves and grass clippings from the
street curbs in the rviorningside area of Edina.
Allowing such placement of these materials at
curbside for pick -up (presumably once a week ?)
would make this portion of the City unattractive)
for those periods of time between pick -ups.
If the refuse hauler wishes to pick up these
materials for composting, he should abide by the
present regulations and pick it up from wherever
he now picks up such materials.
kvvet r N ok Arms
Lod.
1
0� , 4- f��i
April 27, 1987
City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Gentlemen:
With regard to the Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance
which would allow placement of bagged leaves and grass
clippings on the curb for pickup, we OPPOSE STRONGLY
THIS PILOT,PROGRAM!
We maintain it will only prove to clutter the streets
of Morningside; that it could become the habit of many
folks to place their leaves and grass -- perhaps even tree
limbs, and who knows what else - -on the curb a day or two
before the designated pickup time just to get it out of
the way. Further, our rates for garbage removal were just
recently increased by a hauler who presently picks up
our clippings and leaves, and whom we assume will continue
to do so, absent this Amendment. Should this program pass,
it is likely our present collector will NOT then pick up
our grass and leaves, leaving us no alternative but to enlist
somebody else.
We are curious as to why this particular trial program
was slated exclusively for the MORNINGSIDE AREA ONLY?
We challenge the City of Edina to approach the good
people in the COUNTRY CLUB and WEST EDINA districts for
their approval instead - -even though it be for trial purposes
only.
If it flies there, we MAY join them.
,sincerely yours,
Mr. and Mrs. Blake P. Ma le rg
4235 Scott Terrace
Edina, MN 55416
BPM:mm
.idlu4� 60- a'VVi.iJV♦
'y9 SUNNYSIDF. RD.
EDINA. MN 55424
N 0 T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of.bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina
DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give-testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th-Street
Edina, MN 55424
Gentlemen:
3911 Morningside Road
Edina, MN 55416
April 29, 1987
Subject: Bagged Leaves and Grass Clippings
for Morningside Area of Edina
There must be more than.one refuse hauler covering subject area.
Would all haulers cooperate in this test?
All residences do not have the same pickup day or days. This
would mean bags on the curb in some part of the area every working
day.
A drive through St. Louis Park prior to refuse pickup is a strong
argument against curb pickup. However, they apparently have no
restriction on the material that can be put out. The view is often
pretty bad.
If a trial basis is decided on, refuse should be limited to only
bagged leaves or grass clippings.
Placement of bags on the curb should be limited to the evening
prior to the morning of scheduled ickup (which from a cosmetic
standpoint should be early morning.
If a hauler misses a pickup, bags should be removed from the curb
until the next scheduled pickup.
Sincerely,
Donald B. Arndt
�4A
N O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina
DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M'.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987,
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside. area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
L
WENDELL L. HALL
4247 Alden Drive
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416
Telephone 612.926 -7795
yea � WZel-
April 28, 1987
City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Council Members:
We have been residents of the Morningside area for over twenty years and
wish to voice our objections to the proposed ordinance change which would
allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings.
Curbside placement of such material is not aesthetically pleasing and
would lead to a deteriorating appearance of the neighborhood.
Drive through the area of St. Louis Park just north of us late Sunday
afternoons or early Monday mornings to see what curbside pickup can look
like.
Z5TGregory ur Sandra M. Murphy
4311 Morningsi p a Road
IV.A.l. & A.2.
RESPONSES TO MAILED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE CURBSIDE PICK -UP OF BAGGED
LEAVES AND GRASS CLIPPINGS - RECEIVED MONDAY, MAY 4.
r r
IA-421. 0q 32EddzsiC --Af i,,En C> p
4242 02itnE1 OTVEnuF- outfi
��innea�o�is, AinnFiota 55416
G
��r.Gcxya� 'V. y •A�� ��
-rte
� �
���� �� .
Lt��r -�.J i�L,�v �'�-��L
N O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning. Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
.area of Edina
DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801.West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup. n
y-, k-c j-)) C) c�-� � 5 bc�J i red rES�n
ut - � � ��{�
a tic .
%1 \<�r1 e Y1Dkc�%1 . --j A
N O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY. COUNCIL
TO:
All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE:
Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of.bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina
DATE OF HEARING:
May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING:
7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING:
City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE:
1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION:
City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE:
April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit 'the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
a4z
i
N O T I C E
OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina
PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance
to allow placement of. bagged leaves and grass clippings on
the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside
area of Edina
DATE OF BEARING: May 4, 1987
TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M.
PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street
HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views,
and /or
2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the
proposal.
FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
(612) 927 -8861
DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987
The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler
who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup
of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances
presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the
curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider
amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves
and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would
affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside
Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that
the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on
December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of
curbside pickup.
�
o/ �7$17
r
i� ?
tz
. I a
-\, -"
/Ile
et
304
1 ,
l,
IV. A. 3.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian
John Schirmang, Building Inspector
SUBJECT: Amendment to Ordinance No. 434
DATE: April 22, 1987
Our present swimming pool ordinance prohibits electrical conductors
within 15 feet of a swimming pool. The State Electrical Code
permits electrical conductors within 10 feet of a swimming pool
providing the electrical conductors are elevated above the swimming
pool by specific distances; such elevations being determined by
the voltage carried by the conductors.
This amendment will change our electrical conductor separation
from the swimming pool from 15 feet to 10 feet. The 10 foot
separation appears to be a reasonable safety distance for
electrical conductors. However, we believe that we should not
allow electrical conductors to cross over a swimming pool and
we propose to leave language referring to overhead or underground
electrical conductors intact.
Please place this amendment on the May 4, 1987 City Council agenda.
We are asking that second reading of the Amendment be waived
because a building permit is being withheld pending adoption of
this Ordinance amendment.
ORDINANCE NO. 434 -A10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 434
CHANGING THE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SWIMMING POOLS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Paragraph (b) of Section 19 is hereby amended
to read:
"(b) No current - carrying electrical conductors shall cross
residential swimming pools, either overhead or underground or
within 10 feet of such pools except as necessary for pool lighting
or pool accessories.
Sec. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
ATTEST:
May 4, 1987
Waived
s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN
City Clerk
s/ C. WAYNE COURTNEY
Mayor
�s.
VI. A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland
FROM: Ceil Smith
SUBJECT: PUBLIC OFFICIAL /POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY
DATE: May 1, 1987
Attached is a letter from Dave Crowther, the insurance agent who has
sought insurance premium quotations -for the City's Public Officials/
.Police Professional Liability Insurance coverage which are due for
renewal. For the first time in three years, the rates are starting
to drop as indicated in the quotations.
Our Police liability premiums are up slightly because of the increased
numbers of individuals reported covered under the Police Professional
Liability Insurance. Last year's premium was $30,023. The Public Officials
Liability Insurance premium for last year was $10,600.
I am recommending Imperial Casualty and Indemnity for the Police Professional
coverage, which is not the low quote at $31,968, for the following reasons:
1) As in years passed, in order to get the Public Officials Liability at
the rate quoted by National Casualty of $10,625, it is necessary to
insure the Police with a coverage acceptable to National Casualty.
Imperial Casualty and Indemnity is acceptable. The other companies
are not.
2) Imperial Casualty offers $1,000,000 annual aggregate; the other two
quotes are for $500,000 annual aggregate.
3) Lastly, Imperial Casualty is offering an occurance rather than a claims -
made form of coverage. The claims -made coverage is less desirable than
the occurance form of coverage because of the very high potential of
significantly higher premiums in subsequent years of similar coverage.
Looking at the total costs for both coverages, I am recommending Scenario A
per the attachment which is Imperial Casualty and National Casualty, at a
total of $42,593.00, which is the low total bid.
If I can answer any further questions for you, please contact me.
CS /sw
Attachment
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI.A.
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Ceil Smith
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 1, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Public Officials Liability Insurance
Quotations /Bids:
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. National Casualty $10,625.00
2. Tudor Insurance Company 20,625.00
3. Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. 34,557.00
Department Recommendation:
National Casualty
$10,625.00
6 / 4W7
_41Y�,M �&11 /
natu a Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bi is - is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
c
John Wallin, Finance Director
City M ager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council pprove
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
land.-City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cell Smith
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 1, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Police Professional Liability -
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1, WEstern World Insurance Company
2. Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc.
3, Imperial Casualty & Indemnity
Department Recommendation:
VI.A.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$28,230.52
30,273.00
31,968.00
Imperial Casualty & Indemnity $31,968.00
Signature ' Department � P°^v
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is ' is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City M /E ager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase. n
2. I recommend as an alternative:
AL
HWr1S -H0nes Company
6161 Wooddale Ave. Suite 101
P.O. Box 24030
Edina, Minnesota 55424
612- 922.0301
April 29, 1987
William P. Homeyer, CPCU
John R. Harris, CPCU
Douglas H. Crowther
David W. Crowther
Ceil Smith
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Public Official / Police Professional Liability
Dear Ceil,
As discussed, we have approached numerous markets to quote Public
Official and Police Professional Liability. I will schedule quotations in
order of preference:
A. Police Professional: Imperial Casualty and Indemnity
Limit: $500,000 Each Occurrence
$1,000,000 Annual Aggregate
Deductible: $10,000 Each Claim, Incident or Occurence
Form: Occurrence
Premium: $31,968
Public Official: National Casualty Company
Limit: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence
$1,000,000 Annual Aggregate
Deductible: $5,000 Each Loss, including loss adjustment expense
Form: Claims Made
Premium: $10,625
B. Police Professional: Western World. Insurance Company
Limit: $500,000 Each Claim
$500,000 Annual Aggregate
Deductible: $2,500 Each Claim
Page Two
Form: Claims Made
Premium: $28,230.52 (Including Tax and Fees)
Public Official: Tudor Insurance Company
Limit: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence
$1,000,000 Annual Aggregate
Deductible: $15,000 Each Loss
Form: Claims Made
Premium: $20,625.00 (Including Tax and Fees)
C. Police Professional: Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc.
Limit: $500,000 Per Occurrence
$500,000 Policy Aggregate
Deductible: $15,000 Each Claim
Form: Claims Made
Premium: $30,273
Public Official: Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc.
Limit: $500,000 Per Occurrence
$500,000 Policy Aggregate
Deductible: $5,000 Each Claim
Form: Claims Made
Premium: $34,557
I have enclosed material from Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. which
expands on their concept (Risk Retention Group) and the terms of their
quotation.
As the Imperial Casualty Police Professional proposal is competitive
price - wise, and remains on an occurrence form, we would recommend this
program. Similarly, we would recommend the National Casualty Public Official
renewal program.
We have bound Imperial and National Casualty, per your instructions.
Please confirm to me by May 5 that this is acceptable.
Thanks.
T .Regar
Da id Crowther
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 1, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Annual Concrete Supply
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Johnson - Bigler Co., Inc.
f
2. Model Stone Co.
3. Oscar Roberts
4. Apple Valley Ready -Mix
5. Hedberg & Sons
Department Recommendation:
Johnson- Bigler Co., Inc.
VI. B.
Consent
Agenda
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$48.25 per Cu. Yd.
No Bid Received
No Bid Received
No Bid Received
No Bid Received
$48.25 per Cu. Yd.
f-! Public Works
Si atur Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is V/1" is not
within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City pager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI.C.
Consent Agenda
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Ko j et in
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 1, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Equipment Replacement Small Truck for Cushman Scooter for
Ballfieid Maintenance
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1• Polar Chevrolet
Highway 61 & County Road F
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2.
3.
Department Recommendation:
Amount of Quote or Bid
$10,879
Polar Chevrolet $10,879
HENNEPIN COUNTY BID
Signa re Department
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bid is - is not within the amount budget for the purchase,
John Wallin, Finance Director
City anager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Ro land, City Manager
WM 0 R A N D U M
TO: K 1 FROM: K j
DATE: May 1, 1987
SUBJECT: Cushman Replacement with Small Truck
The Cushman scooters that we have now been using for many years
are getting to be very expensive in cost maintenance. The new
small pick -up trucks will give us more maneuverability in our
field locations throughout the city, and they are large enough to
carry soil material as well as equipment for ballfield
maintenance. The scooters that we purchased for over - the -road
cost us $8,000.
It is my recommendation that we purchase the small truck at
$10,879, which is about $3000 more than the Cushman, we will be
able to use the truck twelve months of the year where as the
scooters are only used during the summer and fall months. The
additional $3000 will come from the miscellaneous small equipment
fund.
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
-TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Gordon Hughes
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 4, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Two Harvestings of Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond
-Quotations/Bids:
Company
1. Midwest Aqua Care
2. NO OTHER BIDS
3.
Department Recommendation:
Midwest Aqua Care
VI. D.
Amount of Quote or Bid
$8,768.00
$8,768.00
Department
Finance Director's Endorsement: 14
The recommended bi is is not within the amount budget for the purchase.
tl
�I
0
hn Wal in, Finance Director
City anager's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council a rove
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
Kenneth Rosland, City Manage
zi
V11. A.
Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area
300 Metro.Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291- 6359/TDD 291 -0904
DATE: April 30, 1987
TO: Edina City Council Members
FROM: Connie Kozlak, I -494 Corridor Study Project Manager
SUBJECT: I -494 Study Briefing
As you know the I -494 Corridor has been the subject of a joint agency study for
about a year. The Project Management Team, which includes Leslie Turner & Fran
Hoffman as the Edina representatives, has recently defined some alternative
roadway design concepts. These alternatives will be presented to the public at
an informational meeting to be held May 6 at 7 p.m. at the Edina Community
Center. We encourage you to attend this meeting. In addition, your
representatives on the Project Management Team have asked me and the project
consultant, Dick Wolsfeld of BRW, Inc., to explain these alternatives at your
May 4 City Council meeting.
I have attached the universe of alternative design concepts if you wish to
review these prior to the meeting. At the meeting we will show a 14- minute
video explaining the alternatives and Mr. Wolsfeld will briefly detail the
portions of the alternatives that specifically affect Edina.
DPF368
I
DATE: April 15, 1987
TO: I -494 Project Management Team
FROM: I -494 Core Group
RE: Universe of Alternatives
Revised: April 23, 1987
The alternatives for improvements in the I -494 Corridor have been separated into
four categories: mainline alternatives, system interchanges, access inter-
changes, and parallel arterial alternatives. This memo presents all the alter-
natives which remain after the preliminary screening by the Project Management
Team.
I. MAINLINE ALTERNATIVES
A. Alternative 2: Existing situation plus metered ramps, preferential
access, and Travel Demand Management (TDM).
B. Alternative 5: Add one general purpose lane in each direction
throughout the corridor plus metered ramps, preferential access, and
TOM.
C. Alternative 6: Add one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each
direction throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential
access, and TOM.
D. Alternative 8: Add two general purpose lanes in each direction
throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential access, and
TOM.
E. Alternative 9: Add one general purpose and one HOV lane in each
direction throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential
access, and TOM.
II. ALTERNATIVES FOR REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM INTERCHANGES
A. CSAH 62 Interchange (See Baker Road Area Alternatives)
1. Existing situation /No build - Full diamond interchange.
2. Improve interchange and CSAH 62 /Clearwater Drive access.
B. Washington Avenue /CSAH 18 /West Bush Lake Road /East Bush Lake Road Area
1. Existing situation /No build - Full diamond interchange, no access
to I -494 at Washington Avenue or West Bush Lake Road.
I -494 Project Management Team
April 15, 1987
Page 2
2. Cloverleaf with collector - distributer (c -d) roads on I -494.
Provide ramps to the east from an overpass at Washington Avenue
and ramps to the west from West Bush Lake Road.
3. Semi - directional interchange with c -d roads and ramps as described
above. Loops in the NW and SW quadrants.
4. Fully directional interchange with c -d roads and ramps as
described above.
5. Cloverleaf with c -d roads on I -494. Provide ramps to west at
Washington Avenue overpass and ramps to east at West Bush Lake
Road. Adjacent frontage roads to provide property access.
6. Three -level diamond with one -way frontage roads.
7. Replace property access currently provided at CSAH 18 and East
Bush Lake Road with a new interchange between East and West Bush
Lake Roads. Upgrade CSAH'18 interchange and provide frontage roads
across CSAH 18.
C. TH 100 Interchange
1. Existing situation - Cloverleaf interchange.
2. Semi - directional interchange.
3. Fully directional interchange.
D. Penn /I -35W /Lyndale Area
1. Existing situation /No build - Cloverleaf interchange
2. Fully directional interchange with ramps braided with full
diamonds at Lyndale, Penn and 82nd, half diamond at 76th.
3. Fully directional interchange with half diamonds to outside at
Lyndale, Penn, 82nd and 76th with improvements to the ring road
consisting of Penn, Lyndale, 82nd, and 76th.
4. Fully directional interchange with full diamonds at Lyndale and
Penn with access only to I -494.
I -494 Project Management Team
April 15, 1987
Page 3
III. ALTERNATIVES FOR INTERCHANGES TO PROVIDE ACCESS
A. Baker Road Area
1. Existing situation /No build - No access at Baker Road, no change
at Clearwater, and no change at CSAH 62/I -494.
2. No access at Baker Road /I -494, interchange at Clearwater /CSAH 62,
improve CSAH 62/I -494 interchange.
3. Interchange at Baker Road /I -494 (alternatives discussed below).
No change at Clearwater Drive /CSAH 62, and no change at CSAH 62/
1-494.
a. Existing situation /No build - No access to I -494.
b. Modified diamond interchange - Existing Baker Road alignment.
c. Diamond interchange - Existing Baker Road alignment.
d. Diamond interchange - Baker Road realignment east of I -494 on
the C &NW railroad ROW.
e. Half- diamond interchange - Baker Road realigned on the C &NW
railroad ROW.
f. Split- diamond interchange between the existing Baker Road
alignment and the C &NW railroad alignment.
4. Interchange at Baker Road /I -494 (alternatives discussed above),
reduce the emphasis on access at Clearwater Drive /CSAH 62 (close
median, overpass with no access, etc.).
5. Combination of improvements described in both Alternatives 2 and
3.
B. Area Between Nicollet and TH 77
1. Existing situation /No build
2. Full diamonds at Nicollet and Portland, remove access at 12th.
Provide additional overpasses as necessary.
3. Full diamond at Portland, remove access at Nicollet and 12th.
Provide additional overpasses as necessary.
IV. FRONTAGE ROADS /DETACHED FRONTAGE ROADS /PARALLEL ARTERIALS
A. CSAH 62 to TH 169
1. Existing situation /No build.
B. TH 169 to TH 100
1. South side
a. Existing situation - 78th between West Bush Lake Road and
TH 169, none between East and West Bush Lake Roads, Green
Valley Road between East Bush take Road and TH 100.
b. Add frontage road between East and West Bush Lake Roads.
2. North side
a. Existing situation - Edina Drive /78th
b. Connect 78th with the existing frontage road on the east side
of CSAH 18.
c. Connect 78th to Viking Drive across CSAH 18.
C. TH 100 to Xerxes
1. South side
a. Existing situation - 79th /80th
2. North side
a. Existing situation - 76th /77th
D. Xerxes to I -35W
1. South side
a. Existing situation - 80th
b. Two -way 80th and one -way Southtown Drive
2. North side
a. Existing situation - 78th
b. 76th Street.
c. 76th between Penn and I -35W and 78th between Xerxes and Penn.
_ d. Two -way 76th and one -way 78th between Xerxes and Penn.
E. I -35W to TH 77
1. South side
a. Existing situation - 79th /80th
b. Construct bridges at TH 77 and I -35W
2. North side
a. Existing situation - 76th /77th
b. 77th Street
VII. B.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian
SUBJECT: Revocation of the Food Establishment
License for Swensens Ice Cream,
127 Southdale Center
DATE: April 29, 1987
On April 16, 1987 the Health Department inspected Swensen
Ice Cream restaurant at 127 Southdale Center. The restaurant
received a score of 44. A passing score is 70 or higher based on
a maximum score of 100. This was the fifth inspection conducted
at Swensens Ice Cream since Mohammed and Fatima E1 Gamal began
operating the establishment in March of 1986. The E1 Gamal's
have not passed a food establishment inspection during this
period of time.
The Health Department performs two initial inspections each
year on a licensed food establishment. The initial inspection is
followed by at least one compliance inspection. Since May of
1986 the Department has performed three initial inspections and
two compliance inspections at Swensens Ice Cream.
On September 16, 1987 an inspection found a refrigeration
unit which was being used that was not operating properly. an
order was issued to not use this refrigeration unit until it had
been repaired or replaced. On October 6, 1987 a court citation
was issued to them because they were using this refrigeration
unit even though it was not operating properly. Since October 6,
1986, this violation has been identified on three subsequent
inspections.
Proper refrigeration of food items is a critical control
procedure in the prevention of foodborne illness. The Health
Department is very concerned about food safety in Swensens Ice
Cream Restaurant.
In addition, the following violations have been repeatedly
identified during initial inspections and compliance inspections:
1. Four inspections found food thermometers were not available
for food preparation personnel to check food temperatures.
L
2. Five inspections found food contact surfaces were not clean
and sanitary.
3. Five inspections found hand soap or towels missing at one or
more of the handwash sinks.
4. Five inspections found dirty floors, walls and ceilings.
5. Five inspections found poisonous substances such as cleaning
chemicals improperly stored adjacent to food items or not
properly identified by a label.
The five inspection scores at Swensens Ice Cream Restaurant
since May 1986 are as follows:
May 29, 1986 -
52
July 18,
1986 -
68
December
11, 1986 -
65
December
29, 1986 -
66
April 16,
1986 -
44
The Health Department is seeking revocation of Swensens Ice
Cream food establishment license based on the fact that there
have been repetitive violations at the restaurant and the
restaurant has not passed the minimum inspection rating of 70 for
the five most recent inspections.
The Health Department has advised Swensens Corporate Office
of this pending action. Swensens Corporation has indicated to us
that they will not intervene on behalf of their franchisee.
Mohammed and Fatima E1 Gamal were advised on April 17, 1987
that the Health Department will be asking the Edina City Council
to revoke their food establishment license at the City Council
meeting on Monday May 4, 1987.
CITY OF
JR��- �A���
.'01 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
April 17, 1987
Mohamad and Fatima E1 Gamal
Swensons Ice Cream
127 Southdale Center
Edina, Minnesota 55435
Dear Mohamad and Fatima El Gamal:
You are hereby notified that I will be submitting a
recommendation to the Edina Council that your food
establishment license should be revoked for failure
to comply with the minimum requirements of the Edina
Food Establishment Ordinance.
This recommendation is a result of your failure to act
in good faith to resolve the numerous food handling
violations found during inspections conducted on May
20, 1986, December 11, 1986 and April 16, 1987.
It is in my opinion that the food handling practices
employed by your food establishment present a potential
hazard for the public who purchase and consume food
from your place of business. The Edina Health Department
has attempted to resolve these issues through cooperative
efforts which failed and resulted in our initiating
legal actions to gain compliance. The legal actions
also failed which leaves the Health Department with the
only alternative of seeking license revocation.
The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m. on Monday,
May 4, 1987, in the Council Chamber at 4801 West 50th
Street, Edina, Minnesota. You may be present with
legal counsel to show cause why your food establishment
license should not be revoked.
Sincerely,
David A. Velde
Edina Health Department
DAV /jh
Mavor COUrtnev
L11C: Program Planning
Committee
Government Affairs
Committee
Mayors Cable Program
Cable Commission Chair
M1M: Government Affairs
Committee
Special Appearances
Fred Richards
City School Liaison
Edinborough Development
Liaison
Hedberg Property Liaison
Municipal Legislative
Commission
Park Board
Human Relations Commission
Personnel (City Manager)
Evaluation Committee
Building Construction
Appeals Board
COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES
Leslie Turner
Liaison to Community Devel-
opment & Planning Comm..
Board Member of SHHSC
Personnel Committee Chair
Council representative to
I -494 Corridor Study
Council representative to
guide Strategic Planning
process
Centennial Commission Member
AMM Board Member; Chair of
AMM Housing Committee
Member of Metropolitan
Task Force re: Effects of
Baby Boom on Housing Mkt
Co -Chair of Edina School
Board's Community Services
Task Force
Oversee open appointments
process
Peggy Kelly
Art Center
Community Health Services
Advisory Commission
AMM Revenue Committee
Centennial Commission
Community Action for
Suburban Hennepin (CASH)
VII.E.
Edina Recycling Commission
Edina Heritage Preservation'
Board
Board of Appeals & Adjustments
Citizens Committee for Braemar
Sports Complex
VII.F.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Bob Kojetin and Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: GOOSE CONTROL PROGRAM
DATE: May 1, 1987
We have reported to the City Council on past occasions concerning possible
control measures for Canada geese. In other cities, these control measures
have focused primarily on the capture of geese during their flightless stage
in mid summer, and then subsequent translocation to other parts of the
country. These efforts have been coordinated by Dr. James Cooper of the
University of Minnesota. A copy of a recent study concerning his efforts
is attached.
We have met recently with Dr. Cooper who has outlined a three -year program
of translocation. The annual cost of the program would be $3,266. We have
also received interest by some residents of the City to contribute to the
program to defray our costs.
The first step of the program is to hold a public hearing. This hearing would
be conducted by Dr. Cooper and representatives of the Department of Natural
Resources and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (The hearing would be conducted
at City Hall but the Council need not attend.) We suggest that this hearing
be conducted on May 13th. We would then place the item on the May 18th Council
agenda for final consideration. Anyone wishing to address the Council would
do so on May 18th.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the Council authorize the May 13th hearing.
BK, GH /sw
Attached
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSLOCATION CONTROL OF
MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL CANADA GOOSE POPULATIONS
James A.
Cooper,
Department
of Fisheries and Wildlife University of
Minnesota.
St. Paul
MN
55108
Extirpated by market and subsistence hunting over much of its southern
breeding range during settlement, the Canada goose (Branta canadensis) has been
reestablished in the midwestern and eastern United States and Canada. This
successful wildlife restoration resulted from federal, provincial, state, and private
programs (Nelson 1963, Dill and Lee 1970, Cooper 1978). Canada goose release in
urban - suburban environments began in the 1950s; a decade later, the species was
breeding in Denver, Minneapolis -St. Paul, Detroit, Toronto, Wilmington, and the
suburbans of Boston, and several New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut
communties (Hawkins 1970).
Although noting nuisance goose complaints, Hawkins (1970) concluded that
the bird's aesthetic qualities outweighed the nuisance aspect, and, that with
enlightened management, difficulties could be minimized. However, metropolitan
Canada goose populations and nuisance complaints have grown at phenomenal
rates (Laycock 1982, Oetting 1983). For example, Hawkins (1970) estimated the
Metropolitan Twin Cities population at 448 birds in 1968; currently I estimate this
population at 10,000- 12,000 birds. Complaints of goose droppings on golf course
greens and fairways, docks and swimming beaches, and lawns are frequent and
r 2
widespread. In addition, locally breeding geese use the Minneapolis -St. Paul
International Airport area and have become a serious aircraft hazard. Five Twin Cities'
communities, the Federal Aviation Administration, and Metropolitan Airport
Commission are currently funding population reduction research programs and at
least six other communties are considering population control.
Capture and transportation of flightless Canada geese to a distant site
(translocation) has been used to control nuisance urban populations in
Massachusetts, New York, Michigan, Ontario, and elsewhere. Published reports on
this procedure suggest that it is effective with few birds returning to the capture sites
(Martz et al. 1983, Converse 1985). This paper presents the results of research in the
Twin Cities of Minnesota that indicate translocation effectiveness may be significantly
lower and discusses translocation limitations.
METHODS
Flightless adults and goslings were drive - trapped in June and early July in
1982, 1984, 1985, and 1986 and transported elsewhere by truck. Adult and 1984
immature birds were legbanded and released in Oklahoma; other young geese were
transported to Minnesota sites. Oklahoma was selected as a release area because,
based on 2;000+ band recoveries from 1974 to, 1981, Twin Cities Canada geese did
not winter in or migrate through Oklahoma.
Rates of translocated bird return to the capture sites were determined by
reading legbands in spring and fall each year with spotting scopes, and from drive -trap
recaptures. Breeding females in 1985 and 1986 were identified by the presence of
brood patchs (Hanson 1959) .
3
In an attempt to reduce adult return to Minnesota, the Oklahoma Department of
Wildlife Conservation clipped 1 -2 inches (2.5 -5.0 cm) from the distal three or four
primaries on one wing and pulled the primaries on the other wing in 1985. The 121
geese treated in this manner had been previously translocated. By pulling primaries,
flight was delayed by 1 month (mid- August) and by clipping primaries, the birds had
an imbalance in wing lift. The latter was presumed to be sufficient to prevent
migration.
RESULTS
Flightless adult and young geese were drive - trapped at and translocated from
one, two, six and six Twin Cities' communities in 1982, 1984, 1985, and 1986,
respectively. The 15 capture sites included six suburban lakes, six park- nature
center lakes, two golf courses, and one corporate headquarters pond complex. Two
hundred sixty -one adults and 195 goslings were removed in 1982, 530 and 480 in
1984, 375 and 486 in 1985, and 198 and 309 in 1986 (Table 1). One hundred
ninety -five immatures were translocated to Carver Park Reserve (20 miles [32 km]
SW of the trap site) in 1982, 424 sent to Oklahoma in 1984, and 798 were released at
Minnesota sites 50+ miles (80+ km) from the capture site in 1985 and 1986.
Legbands were placed on 256, 200, and 489 young in 1984, 1985, and 1986,
respectively.
After the 1982 translocation, the Minneapolis population decresed 55% (505 to
225) in 1983, and gosling production declined 43% (193 to 110). Based on legband
readings from females with broods, 18 of 29 (62 %) of the breeding females were
translocated geese. This population recovered to 1982 levels by 1984 with
4
Table 1. Canada goose translocations from the Twin Cities of Minnesota
and released or uncaptured geese,1982, 1984 -86.
Location Translocated Brood patch Not
year Adult Immature Total females captured
Edina
1985
20
6
26
3
3
1986
3
8
11
2
3
Golden Valley
1984
157
288
445
33
6
1985
81
155
236
36
0
1986
46
89
135
23
0
New Brighton
1985
38
68
106
13
0
1986
19
36
55
8
0
Minneapolis
1982
261
195
456
__
50a
1984
373
192
565
55
11a
1985
170
116
286
51
14a
1986
58
60
118
25
20a
Plymouth
1985
22
43
65
10
0
1986
51
100
151
21
6
Richfield
1985
44
98
142
18
17
1986
21
16
37
9
3
Total
1,364
1,470
2,834
307
133
a Released at capture site.
5
Table 2. Twin Cities recapture and observation of 1,616 banded Canada
geese translocated from the Twin Cities to Minnesota and Oklahoma sites,
1982, 1984 -85.
Number
banded
First
observed
in 1983
First
observed
in 1984
First
observed
in 1985
First
observed
in 1986
Total
Percentage
1982 1984 1985 Total
Adult Immature Adult Immature Adult Immature Return
261 195 447 256 257 200
18 5 23
12
3
15
0
72
1
0
76
4
81
2
0
25
0
72
0
99
33
8
101
4
72
0
218
13
4
23
2
28
0
13
6
373 adults and 192 goslings captured (Table 1). After 1984 removals, the
Minneapolis population declined by 49% (565 to 286) and production was 40%
lower (192 to 116). In 1985, 170 adult geese were captured in Minneapolis, 46'/0
fewer than in 1984, and in 1986, 58 were caught, a decline of 66% from 1985.
Overall, Minneapolis removals resulted in a 90% drop in adults and a 69% decrease
in young produced from 1984 to 1986. At the other sites, adult decline in the first year
after translocation was 38 %, and reproduction was 37% lower. Second year
translocation decreases were 43% for Golden Valley adults and 43% for production.
Overall, Golden Valley adults declined 70% and reproduction 69% after two years of
removal.
Oklahoma translocated adult geese returned to the capture sites at a
significantly (P <0.05) higher rate than immatures released in Minnesota or in
Oklahoma. Eight of 195 (4 %) immatures translocated to Carver Park, none of the
1985 Minnesota released young, and four of 256 (2 %) of the Oklahoma released
immatures returned to the capture sites. In contrast, 33 (13 %), 101 (23 %), and 72
(28 %) of translocated adults returned (Table 2). The clipping of the outer primaries
on one wing did not significantly (P >0.05) reduce adult return rates. Thirty -three of
121 (27 %) of these birds returned in 1986.
Based on brood patch data from 1985 and 1986 recaptures, returning
translocated geese made up a high proportion of the breeding populations. In 1985,
43 of 87 (49 %) brood patch females captured were translocated geese; the proportion
was 47 of 88 (53 %) in 1986. Seventy -six percent of the 1986 Minneapolis brood patch
females were Oklahoma translocated geese.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study demonstrate that translocation can reduce nuisance
populations of Canada geese in urban - suburban communities. Breeding
populations were 40 -50% and 70 -90% lower, and reproduction reduced by 30 -40%
and 60 -70% after land 2 years of removal, respectively. Without the high (12 -28 %)
return of translocated adults, particularly breeding females, the effectiveness of the
techniques would have been far greater. Translocated adult females constituted 500%
of the breeding females in 1985 and 1986. Moreover, the rate of translocated bird
return rose with time (Table 2), suggesting that additional adult translocations to the
same area will be less effective. In contrast, young birds can be moved very short (20
miles or 32 km) distances from the capture site without significant returns.
My findings differ from Converse's (1985). She reported fewer than 3% of the
legbanded Canada geese translocated as far north as Maine and as far south as
Georgia returned to her southeastern New York - southwestern Connecticut study area.
These birds, unlike the Minnesota populations, were non - migratory and it may be that
Canada geese that migrate have a much higher likelihood of returning to the capture
sites.
Control of urban - suburban Canada goose populations is expensive (Martz et al.
1983) and in Minnesota costs are paid primarily from local government funds. In
addition, goose control is highly visible with frequent media coverage and
controversy. The birds are easily counted, thus population reduction projections must
be accurate or program creditability is diminished. Thus it is critical that population
reduction projections be based on a realistic estimate of translocation bird return.
Ultimately, translocation will be self - limiting as states and provinces willing to
accept translocated geese meet their goose restoration goals. Long -term urban goose
population reductions will have to be based on other techniques. These include
reproduction reduction by physical or chemical means, increased mortality via
additional hunting where possible, and perhaps trapping and slaughter for human
consumption.
Acknowledgments. -- Funding for this research was provided by the University of
Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, the Cities of Minneapolis, Golden Valley,
and New Brighton, General Mills Corporation, the Federal Aviation Administration, and
Metropolitan Airports Commission. I thank the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, the U. S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture for coordinating permits and
assistance with capture and translocation. Many people contributed to this project. I
thank Tim Anderson and Arlis Olson, Metropolitan Airports Commission, and Oren
Burckhardt and Les Case, Federal Aviation Administration for their coordination of
funding and access to the airport facilities. Nancy Burgstahler and Mary Mitchell, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Richard Wetzel, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Roger
Johnson, Lloyd Knudson, Jon Parker, Tim Wallace, and others with Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, Jontie Aldrich and other Oklahoma Department of
Wildlife Conservation personnel provided invaluable assistance. Mari Smaby, Wayne
Winkleman, Terry Birkenstock, Lori Hawkins, Tom Roster, Judi Mikolai, Caroline
Yineman, and Mike Palanuk, University of Minnesota, assisted with banding,
population surveys, translocation, and data processing.
REFERENCES CITED
Converse, K. A. 1985. A study of resident nuisance Canada geese in Connecticut
and New York. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst. 84pp.
Cooper, J.A. 1978. The history and breeding biology of the Canada geese of Marshy
Point, Manitoba. Wildl. Monogr. 61. 87pp.
Di III H.H. and F.B. Lee, eds. 1970. Home grown honkers. U. S. Dep. Inter., Fish and
Wild[. Serv., Washington, D. C. 154pp.
Hanson, H. C. 1959. The incubation patch of wild geese: its recognition and
significance. Arctic 12:139 -150.
Hawkins, A.S. 1970. Honkers move to the city. Pages 120 -130 in H.H.Dill and F.B.
Lee, eds. Home grown honkers. , U. S. Dep. Inter., Fish and, Wildl.
Serv.,Washington, D. C.
Laycock, G. 1982. The urban goose. Audubon 84:44 -47.
Martz, J., L. Pospichal, and E. Tucker. 1983. Giant Canada geese in Michigan:
experiences with trans[ocations and nuisance management. Page 57 -59 in M.A.
Johnson ed. Transactions of the Canada goose symposium. North Dakota
Chapter of The Wildlife Society.
Nelson, H.K. 1963. Restoration of breeding Canada goose flocks in the North Central
States. Trans. North. Am. Wildl. and Nat. Resour.Conf. 28:133 -150.
Oetting, R. 1983. Overview of management of Canada geese and their recent
urbanization. Page 52 in M.A. Johnson ed. Transactions of the Canada goose
symposium. North Dakota Chapter of The Wildlife Society.
600
z
O_ 500
H
J 400
a0 300
CL
w 200
z
100
0
z
O
H 400
Q
J
M 300
a
O
CL 200
w
z
100
A
MINNEAPOLIS
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
GOLDEN VALLEY
1982 1983 1984 1985 1986
YEAR
_O
a
J
a
O
a
F-
Z
W
U
W
CL
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
MINNEAPOLIS
G. VALLEY
70
47 49
79
FIRST SECOND
90
YEARS OF REMOVAL
THIRD
94
Salaries (program coordination
and monitoring)
Shipping and Travel
Miscellaneous (boots, field
forms, computer disks)
Budget:
1987 1988
2,500 2,500
700 700
1989 1990
2,500 2,500
700 700
.- M.
TOTAL 3,266 3,266 3,266 3,266
(Orriciai Pubiicacion)
CITY OF EDINA X.A.
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED
ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OF
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council.of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will meet on May 4,
1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th
Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting
a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue its general
obligation tax increment refunding bonds (the Refunding Bonds),
in order to.refund in advance of their maturity all or a
portion of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985,.dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal
amount of $12,000,000 (the Series 1985 Bonds). The maximum
aggregate principal amount of the Refunding Bonds is $13,200,000.
The Prior Bonds were used to finance public
redevelopment costs incurred by the City and the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City .(the HRA)
in connection with the Edinborough Development presently
being constructed in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area.
The Edinborough Development is generally located in the extreme
southeast corner of the corporate limits of the City._ The
Edinborough Development is a mixed use development containing _
• commercial office building, a condominium housing project,
• multifamily elderly rental housing facility, and a public
park and other public amenities. The initial owner of the
commercial office building is Edinborough Office East Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; the initial
owner of the condominium housing project is the Edinborough
Condominium Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership;
the initial owner of the multifamily rental housing facility
is Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota
limited partnership; and the initial owner of the public
park and other public amenities is the HRA.
The principal of and.interest on the Refunding
Bonds are expected to be paid from tax increments to be derived
from the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area, but if necessary
for the payment of such principal and interest, ad valorem
taxes will be required to be levied on all taxable property
within the corporate limits of the City.
All persons interested may appear and be heard
at the time and place set forth above, or may file written
comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing
set forth above.
Dated: April 15, 1987.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
By /s /Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 4, 1987
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Tape Recordings
During January 1987, in the course of enforcing traffic law, the issue of
the propriety of an officer tape- recording conversations with violators has
become a matter of discussion. And, one person involved in such a
recording has asked the City to identify its position on the matter.
The facts surrounding the.January incident include:
- The stopping of a car on Interlachen Blvd. for a speed limit
violation.
- Conversations (tape - recorded) between the violator and the officer,
unknown to the violator.
- The issuance of a citation.
- Continued conversation with criticism directed toward the officer by
the violator.
- A complaint of the officer's action to the Police Captain by the
violator.
-,An investigation by the Captain that included discovery of the tape
recording which exonerated the officer's actions.
- A report to the complaining violator of the existence of the tape
recording and the findings of the investigation.
- Continuing complaints about the practice of tape recording to the
Police Department and the City Prosecutor.
In this case, the issue has moved from the violation,of speed law to the
practice of tape recording conversations of violators. The officer
involved has used the tape recording technique for several years. He has
historically been the most active officer on the Department and deals with
thousands of violators annually. During the course of any enforcement
action, confrontation and criticism of the officer's action may occur.
Occasionally these criticisms become complaints against the officer and are
investigated. This officer has chosen to make these recordings to protect
himself from unfounded complaints.
The issues of the recording must be put into its proper perspective. It is
not intended as a part of the evidence - gathering process. It is viewed as
an administrative safeguard by the officer. Several other officers in the
Memorandum — Tape Recordings
Page 2
May 4, 1987
metropolitan area utilize the same technique. However, no police agencies
require their use nor prohibit the practice.
In February 1987, Attorney Marsh Halberg, the City Prosecutor, commented
that the practice was not illegal and was a common practice in the law
enforcement community.
On May 1, 1987, Attorney Stephen Lucke of the City Attorney's Office
indicated the use of the tape recorder is a legal activity with no legal
objections to the practice.
I understand the feelings of the complainant in this matter. I'm sure none
of us appreciate not being in control of a situation, notwithstanding being
tape recorded in the process. However, the officer's vulnerability is also
a consideration. Officers are accused of arrogance, lying, using
profanity, and racial and ethnic slurs during such events. In this case,
the officer has used a legal practice to protect himself from such
complaints.
Given the above facts and discussion, I recommend that the City take no
action on the matter. The unstated policy of the Police Department has
been to neither encourage nor prohibit the use of tape recorders by
officers and I would recommend the continuance of that policy. The use of
recordings has been in the administrative area and should they be
considered for introduction into criminal proceedings, all legal
requirements will be met.
If you have further questions, please contact me.
CRAIG SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
-
- - M- ESSERLI & KRA-M E R-
WILLIAM F..MESSERLI-
ATTORNEYS AT LAW - -
ROSS E. KRAMER
-
DAVID R. KRACUM -
1500 NORTHLAND PLAZA BUILDING
MARK S. LARSON -
TIMOTHY J. BAUER,
-
- 3.800 WEST 80TH STREET..
REBECCA.H. FREDERICK
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431-4409
ROBERT G. RENNER, JR.
-
SANDRA L. NEREN -
'(612) 893 -6650
RANDOLPH W. MORRIS
-
THOMAS M. REGAN
PAUL M. BEGICH -
- -
CHRISTOPHER B. HUNT
-, LAURIE P. HUUSKO
'JAMES C. WICKA
-
DIANE A. KOTULA
_
ERIC A. SHORT
MICHAEL D. PEDERSON
-
DATE:
APRIL 30, 1987
TO:
MLC Operating Committee
FROM:
Bob Renner, Jr.
RE:
School Aids Bill
Please find enclosed a copy of the House School Aids bill which
passed the House floor on Thursday, April 30, 1987.
This computer run is up to date and includes all the provisions
in the House bill. Since the Association of Metropolitan School
Districts prepared.this computer print out, not all MLC cities
may be included.
As you can see, the average suburban school district will be
required to levy 17.8 percent more property tax dollars and will
receive only 3.2 percent more revenue.
2,585{ 25.79 oillsl ED�42695 HOUSE FMM71ON AND RETIREPOIT REVEM E PER OLD 001 3 YEAR
1 - 198647 CURRENT STATUTES- 1 1987 -68 HOUSE PRA 1 1988-89 HOUSE PROPOSAL
I FMM/ I FMMD/ -PEI fT DPME IN--- I FMW/ TOTAL -PERCM DPEE I*-,
I RETIRE STATE I RETIRE STATE TOTAL STATE I RETIRE AID LEVY TOTAL STATE
ISTRICT 1 REVERE AID LEVY I REVERE AID LEVY REVEL g AID LEVY I REVEKE PER MD3 PER UAIM REVENLE AID LEVY
1 1
a -Dml? "oTON
13 ROOKLYN CENTER
6 JRNSVILLE
tow
COLIAEIA HEI6'1TTS
WIMA
PIDLEY
1j;VINGS
tt1PKINS
JMR GROYE -PINE
mWM;4EDi
MINNET010W
MIM VIEW
/JJRTH ST. PAUL -N
0 ,I
/ M FIELD
AMIMSDALE
KISEVILLE
$ aINT ANTHONY
SAINT LOUIS PARK
Swam
S xlTH ST. PAIL
SUM IfA6HINGTOd
STRING LAKE P M
STILLUATER
V41YZATA
fA m ST. PAIL
V(ESTONMA
tAITE BEAR LAKE
1 2,742
1 2,838
1 2,539
1 2,457
1 2,739
1 2,737
517
1,121
1,228
1,415
1,258
359
2,226 1
19789. 1
1,319 1
1,042 1
1,481 1
2,387 1 .
29797
2,834
2,639
2,537
2,817
2,786
594
19181
10228
11439
1,2®6
389
2,213
19653
19411
1,598
1,611
2,406
2.0%
0.2%
3.9%
3.3%
2.9%
1.8%
118%
5.4%
0.7%
1.7%
-4.1%
8.6%
-9.6% 1
-13% 1
7.8% I
5.3% 1
8.8% 1
9.8% 1
1,960
1,926
1,728
1,613
4918
2,895
291
1, m
1,164
19395
1,537
0
2,609
1,845
1,564
1,216
1,881
3,439
3.7%
3.2%
3.4%
3.9%-
3.6%
3.9%
-W. 2%
-8.5%
-5.3%
-3.0%
-14.1%
- 109.0%
17.97
11.61
18.9'
15.83
16.8r
42.51
1 2,592
1,289
1,384 1
2,662
1,337
19326
2.7%
3.7%
1.7% 1
2,148
19249
1,499
3.2% "
-6.6%
13.11
1 2,431
19559
873 1
2,549
1,604
945
4.8%
2.9%
8.3% 1
2,627
1,575
1,051
3.0%
-1.ai
11.2'1
1 2,844
351
1,494 1
2,885
381
2,594
1.4%
8.6%
0.4% 1
1,946
0
3,466
2.1%
-1M.9%
38.4.
1 1,463
1,516
949 1
2,579
1,548
1,®22
4.3%
2.1%
7.7% 1
1,646
1,487
1,158
3.9%.
-3.9%
13.4
1 44%
1,172
1,318 1
2,562
I'M
1, 271
2.9%
18.2%
-3.6% 1
2,60
1, 268
1,312
3.9%
-1.8%
& M
1 2,685
861
19744 1
2,682
898
1,784
2.9%
4.3%
2 3% 1
1,776
729
2,047
3.5%
-18.8%
14.8.
1 2,579
1,028
1,541 1
2,636
1,965
1,571
2.6%
3.6%
1.9% 1
2,726
936
11741
3.4%
-7.4%
IL B;
I 1,608
11133
1,475 1
2,692
11188
1,512
3.2%
4.2%
2.5% 1
21784
19118
19667
3.4%
-5.3%
1L?,'
1 2,677
748
1,929 1
21129
816
1,913
1.9%
9.1%
-9.8% 1
2,826
6N
2,M
3.6%
-24.0%
15.3,
I 2,719
611
2,179 1
2,842
662
2,180
1.9%
8.4%
0.0% 1.
2,948
393
2,5M
3.7%
-0.6%
17.25
1 21727
1,169
1,558 I
2,822
1,202
11620.
3.5%
2.9%
4.0% 1
49M
190M
1,876
3.7%
-12.2%
15.41'
1 2,773
572
2,201, 1
4818
560
2,251
1.6%
-2.8%
1.6% 1
21878
248
21630
2.1%
-.7x
16.5,
1 4836
373
21463 1
2,877
481
21396
1.4%
28.8%
-2.7% 1
2,936
187
21749
2.1%
-61.1%
14.15
I 2,986
483
21581 1
3,918
436
2,583
1.1%
7.5%
0.1% 1
3,083
0
31697
1.2%
-IN. 0%
39.71
1 21481
1,246
19232 1
29580
19215
1,365
4.0%
-2.6%
19.7% 1
21659
19148
11511
3.1%
J15%
10.7r
1 2,648
11481
11238 1
2,716
11447
1,269
2.9%
3.3%
2.4% 1
21899
11493
19406
3.4%
-3.1%
19.81
1 2,480
11649
849 1
21593
1,720
873
4.6%
4.9%
4.0% 1
2,676
1,714
963
3.2%
-0.3%
IL b
1 21524
1,310
11214 1
29590
1,379
1,211
2.6%
5.2%
-0.2% 1
2,670
1,314
19356
3.1%
-4.7%
12.0
1 1,533
1,347
11187 1
29631
1,393
19237
3.9%
3.6%
4.2% 1
2,719
19365
19354
3.3%
-2.1%
9.51
1 295%
596
1,994 1
21643
578
21665
2.1%
-3.0%
3.6% 1
2,735
482
2,332
3.5%
7-39.4%
12.9x
1 29568
312
2,256 1
4664
343
2,322
3.7%
9.7%
2.9% 1
2,756
9
21832
3.4%
- 168.8%
22.8•:1
1 2,675
835
19849 1
2,742
993
1,839
2.5%
8.1%
0.9% 1
2,838
756
2,081
3.5%
- 16.2%
13.2. " -
1 21532
19469
1,983 1
- 29647
19469
11178
3.7%
9.9%
8.8% 1
2,736
11435
19382
3.4%
-2.3%
19.5%
ASD AVER 1 2,637 994 11643 1. 21709 . 1,032• " 1,677 2.7% 3.8% 2.1% 1 4795 877 19976 3.2% -15.1% 17. e%
NOTEi Foundation/Reti, nt Revenue Columns do NOT include Suer School funds.
MCMTnTTM M WTanM TTAN q Vlxy.. DTRTRTrT5
r
senate Pr erty Sax Plan Highlights
Reduces the number of property classes from 68 to 9 to make the
property tax system easier to understand and less costly to
administer
° Removes incentives in the state's property tax system for local
government c`ticia!s to increase spending, and increases the
predictability of property tax relief programs by limiting state
reimbursement fcrthe homestead credit and school agriculture
credit -- which increase with increased local govemment
spending -- to a fixed percentage increase
° bolds down property tax increases by limiting the amount of
increase in property taxes by towns, cities and counties to no more
than three percent for property taxes to be paid in 1988
° Increases state aid to counties which have a property tax of more
than one -half mill for public assistance income maintenance
programs
m Increases state aid to cities in areas experiencing rapid decline in
property values due to depressed economic conditions
° Reduces the comparatively high property tax burden on the owners
of commercial - industrial property
° Retains the property tax refund program for both renters and
homeowners
° Makes the property tax refund program more progressive by
providing larger property tax refunds for households with
dependents in comparison with households with no dependents
Liescri pion ®f Senate Property `fax Plan
Property Tax Disparity Bids to Counties
This is a new aid program aimed at reducing the property tax burden of property
owners residing in distressed counties which levy more than one -half mill for public
assistance maintenance programs, including general assistance. The aid would
equal up to 95 percent of the counties' cost of the program exceeding an amount
Equivalent to one -half mill. The c^st of the program for 1988 is estimated at about $13
million.
Property Tax Disparity Aids to Cities
The Senate plan provides increases in local government aids to all cities and towns. In
addition, cities and towns in economically depressed areas that are experiencing
rapidly declining property values would receive substantial increases in state aids in
order to reduce their high tax rates.
Homestead Credit and School Agricultural Credit Aid
The Senate plan changes the homestead credit and school agricultural credit from a
credit program tied to fluctuations in property tax bills to a state aid program financed
by a fixed appropriation in the state budget.
Local units of government wou!d continue to receive a payment from the state equal to
the amount of homestead credit and school agricultural credit they now receive. As a
result, local governments would not have to raise added property taxes caused by the
change in the programs from a credit to a state aid.
The owners of homes and farms would have a portion of their property's value exempt
from property taxes. The exemption would be equivalent to the amount of reduction in
their property tax bills resulting from the homestead credit and/or school agricultural
credit. The exemption would be 52 percent of the first $68,000 of the home's value.
Therefore, property owners would end up paying the same amount of tax as they now
pay under current law.
Aids to Local Governments for Reclassification of Properties
The Senate proposes reducing the number of property classes from 68 to nine. Any
local unit of government experiencing a reduction in its property values caused by the
plan would receive additional state aids to compenstats for any tax loss resulting from
the changes. This would result in property owners not having to pay additional taxes to
make up for a reduction in other property owners' values because of the plan.
a
I
Levy Limits for Cities and Counties
The plan would limit property tax increases by cities, towns and counties for 1988 only
to no more than a 3 percent increase over the amount of property taxes and state aid
the kcal unit of government received in 1987. Local units of government receiving
increases in state aids in 1988 would have to offset the amount of the limit for any
increase they received in state aid. This limit is being put in place for one year only
because of the far - reaching changes that would be made to the state's property tax
system under the Senate plan.
The levy limits for cities would not apply to the amount they levy'to repay debts. For
counties, the limits would not apply to the amount they levy to pay for the cost off public
income maintenance and public assistance programs for the needy. The counties'
levy to pay for the cost of social service programs would be limited to increases in their
caseloads plus the rate of inflation.
Simplifying the Classificati ®n of Property in Minnesota
The Current Classes:
nm e
homestead dwelling unit in building
owned by cooperative or charity
non - agricultural homestead
of blind or disabled persons
homestead dwelling unit of blind or
disabled persons in building owned
by cooperative or charity
residential property with fewer than
4 units when entitled to homestead
for at least one unit (homestead)
percentage of
market value taxed
first $65,000 at 18 %,
amount over $65,000 at 2810
first $32,500 at 5 %, next
$32,500 at 18 %, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
first $32,500 at 5O1o, next
$32,500 at 18p1o, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
first $65,000 at 18 %, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
residential property of blind or disabled first $32,500 at 5 %, next
person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount
entitled to homestead for unit occupied over $65,000 at 28%
by blind or disabled person (homestead)
residential property with fewer than 4 first $65,000 at 18 %, amount
units when entitled to homestead for at over $65,000 at 28%
entitled to"homestead for at least
one unit (non- homestead)
residential property of blind or disabled first $32,500 at 5 %, next
person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount
entitled to homestead occuped by blind over $65,000 at 28%
or disabled person (nonhomestead)
The Proposed Class:
Residential Ilontestead: 40% up to $60,000,
62% above (60% in 1989)
{
The Current Classes:
prnpErty
agricultural homestead
(family farmland)
agricultural homestead of blind or
disabled persons
(family farmland)
agricultural land and buildings used for
purposes of homestead and farmed
by person holding vested remainder
interest (family farrland)
agricultural homestead
(homestead use)
agricultural homestead of
blind or disabled persons
(homestead)
agricultural land and buildings used for
used for purposes of homestead and
farmed by person holding vested
remainder interest (homestead)
percentage of
market value taxed
first $65,00 at 14 %,
amount over $65,000 at 18%
first $32,500 at 5 %, next
$32,500 at 14 %, amount
over $65,000 at 28p7o
first $65,000 at 14 %,
over $65,000 at 18%
first $65,000 at 14 %,
amount over $65,000 at 18%
first $32,500 at 5 %, next
$32,500 at 14 %, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
first $65,000 at 14%,
second $65,000 at 18%
The Proposed Class:
Farm Homestead: 30% of value to
$64,000,40% above
The Current Classes
r�Perty
agricultural land, non- homestead
rural land used exclusively
for growing timber
non - agricultural homestead
percentage of
market value taxed
18%
18%
first $65,000 at 18 %,
amount over $65,000 at 28%
The Proposed Class:
Farm Non - Homestead: 40%
The Current CI -asses:
PrPe-M
commercial and industrial property
employment property in a border city
employment property in
an enterprise zone
ercenta eeof
market value taxed
first $60,000 at 28 %, amount
over $60,000 at 43%
first $50,000 at 28 %, amount
over $50,000 at 38 1/2%
first $50,000 at 20 %, amount
over $50,000 at 21 1/2%
The Proposed Class:
Commercial /Industrial: 62% to$80,000,
96% above; 60% up to $80,000 and
90% above in 1989
The Current Classes:
p-opert X
apartment buildings of type I and type 11
construction of at least 5 stories
residential, non - homestead property
with 4 or more units
hospitals licensed under M.S. 144.40
to 144.56, other than exempt hospitals,
and contiguous property used
for hospital purposes
percentage of
market value taxed
building at 25 %,
land at 34%
34'0
34%
The Proposed Class:
Market Rate Dental Property,
4 or more units: 76 % (70%
in 1989)
The Ctnrreant Classes:
ro ,e
non - profit community service
oriented organization property not
used for commercial purposes
residential property with fewer than
4 units when entitled to homestead
for at least one unit (homestead)
percentage of
market value taxed
21%
first $65,000 at 18 %, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
residential property of blind or disabled firsr$32,500 at 5 %, next
person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount
entitled to homestead for unit occupied over $65,000 at 28%
by blind or disabled person (homestead)
residential property with fewer than 4
units when entitled to homestead for at
entitled to homestead for at least
one unit (non - homestead)
residence on non - homestead
agricultural land
residential, non - homestead
property with 3 or fewer units
first $65,000 at 18%, amount
over $65,000 at 28%
28%
28%
post- secondary student housing owned by 28 %
non -profit corporations and used
exclusively by sororities or fraternities
continuing care facilities with residency assessed in manner set
agreements that enable residents to occupy for cooperatives and charities
units after personal assets are exhausted
manufactured homes not classified 28%v
under any other provisions
The Proposed Class:
Market (date Rental Property,
3 or fearer units: 62% (60%
in 1989)
f
.i'dy^ala +. a -�. r'.� <�r m... :a . mss•. . s �..n �. may, c Ems. 2 I _ — I I-
The Current Classes:
ro c
seasonal residential - recreational,
commercial use, including a homestead
(homestead use)
seasonal residential- recreational,
non - commercial use
percentage of
market value taxed
only for cabins and land in
an area of 800' x 509 at 12%
21%
seasonal residential- recreational, commer- 21%
cial use not used for commercial purposes
more than 200 days per year
seasonal residential - recreational, commer- 21%
cial use not used for commercial purposes
more than 200 days per year
Section 8 U.S. Housing Code housing building at 20%
financed by private institution. land at 34%
neighborhood real estate trust 20%
low- income housing owned by non - profit building at 20 %,
or limited dividend organization built before land at 34%
Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by MHFA
or NHA -
low- income housing owned by non -profit portion of building occupied
or limited dividend organization built after by low- income persons at
Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by MHFA 20 %, land and rest of
or NHA. building at 34%
The Proposed Class:
Seasonal /Subsidized Rental
Property: 50%
The Current Classes:
Property
seasonal residential - recreational,
commercial use and including
a homestead
low- income housing owned by non - profit
or limited dividend organizations built belt
Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by FmHA.
low- income housing owned by non - prout
or limited dividend organization built after
Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by FmHA.
percentage of
market value taxed
only for cabins and land in
an area of 800' x 500' at 12%
building at 10 %,
ire land at 34%
portion of building occupied
by low- income persons at
20 %, land and rest of
building at 34%
The Proposed Class:
Small Seasonal /Subsidized
Rental: 30%
The Current Classes:
rp onerty percentage of
market vaine taxed
unimproved land not used for 40%
commercial or industrial
activities
vacant land 40%
unmined iron ore 50%
low -grade iron ore 30%-481/2%
depending on quality
fixed tools, machinery of a utility or 331/3%
pipeline company
all property not in any other class 43%
s
The Proposed Class:
All Other Property: 100%
Senate 4 Proaram s
Individual Income Tax
- Dramatically increases fairness and progressivity by:
• broadening the base through elimination of special interest group preferences,
deductions and loopholes
• reducing state tax burden for nearly three - fourths of taxpayers by
- dropping the rates to 6% and 8%
- dropping 125,000 low income families from tax rolls
• returning entire windfall gained by conforming to federal law ($660 million) to
taxpayers
- Simplifies by:
• allowing two- thirds of taxpayers to use a five -line short form
• reducing the long form from 30 to 18 lines
• conforming to the federal tax law, lessening the complexity of
multiple exemptions
- Increases accountability and enforceability by making tax system easier for taxpayers to
understand
- Brings Minnesota's tax rates more in line with income tax rates of other states
Sates Tax
- Increases fairness by removing certain exemptions from the tax and thereby broadening
the tax base
Increases stability and predictability of state revenue
Business Taxes
- Increases fairness and stability by:
• broadening the tax base
• reducing the top corporate tax rate from 120/6 to 8.9%
• adding minimum tax for large corporations not now paying
• removing ability to carry back operating losses
• extending motor fuels tax to railroads
-Brings Minnesota's business tax rates more in line with other states
Property Taxes
-Substantially increases fairness by:
• reducing the disparities in tax rates between counties and cities that result
from differences in the wealth of property tax bases of communities or spending
patterns caused by a downturn in economic conditions
• reducing the property taxes for property owners now paying at high effective tax
rates
• adjusting the state's property tax refund program for homeowners and renters
by providing larger property tax refunds to homeowners or renters who have
dependents
• retaining the renter's credit
-Dramatically simplifies by reducing the number of classifications from 68 to 10 to make
the property tax system easier to understand
- Removes incentives in the state's property tax system for increasing spending by local
government officials
-Makes state spending for property tax relief programs more stable and predictable
6
y�
Sf
1 �
Senate Tax Plan for Fiscal Year 1988 -89
Revenue 1988 -89
millions
Individual Income Tax $ -3.8
Corporate Income Tax 161.5
Telephone Gross Earnings Tax 118.2
Elimination of the Tobacco Tax Exemption for Prisons 0.8
Railroad and Barge Fuel Excise Tax 15.1
Sales Tax
• Meals provided to employees
3.9
• Interstate telephone calls (except incoming WATS calls)
48.7
• Custom computer software
2.9
• State and local government purchases
127.0
• Railroad rolling stock
2.2
• Hospital cafeteria meals
14.1
• Nonprofit organization purchases
30.7
• Sales of Minnesota -bred horses
2.2
• Admission to public recreation areas
1.9
• Admission to nonprofit artistic performances
2.5
• Sales of boats
2.3
• Inclusion of federal taxes in price of item sold
4.2
• Motor vehicle purchases by units of government
14.9
• Non- prescription health and hygiene products
31.6
• Parking charges
7.2
• Health club charges
2.1
• Pet grooming services
1.0
• Detective and security services
2.6
• Building cleaning and maintenance services
17.1
• Car services (non- repair)
6.8
• Laundry and dry cleaning services (except coin - operated)
18.9
• Added sales tax due to cigarette tax increase
6.7
• Sales tax charged on gas -tax exempt gasoline purchases
0.8
• Elimination of sales tax on food -stamp purchases
-1.2
• Reduction in sales tax rate on dealer- installed purchases
-2.2
Insurance Gross Premiums Tax (except for nonprofit and fraternal organizations) 24.5
Deed and Mortgage Registration Taxes
Value -based Tax on Liquor and Beer
27.0
11.6
$705.0
MINUTES OF THE.REGULAR MEETING
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 24,_1987 AT :30 P.M.
EDINA CITY HALL MANAGERS CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Stuart, Tom Martinson,
John Metil, Lois Wilder and David Gepner
STAFF PRESENT: Harold Sand
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Mr. Martinson moved approval of the November 25, 1986
minutes as submitted. Mr. Metil seconded the motion. All voted
aye motion carried.,
I.I. EDINA COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT ELMS:
A. West 60th Street. Mr. Stuart explained the City
Council approved a street reconstruction project that does not
widen West 50th Street. The street will be striped for left
turn lanes. The project also includes removal of the boulevard
elm trees on the north side of the street under the power lines.
The Heritage Preservation Board went on record previously that
the trees should be preserved.
Mr. Sand said that the project extends from Edina Court on
the west to Halifax Avenue on the East and includes total
reconstruction of the streets, sidewalks and underground
utilities. The existing 40 foot street width will be preserved.
The overhead power line will be buried within the right -of -way
north of the sidewalk and the north sidewalk moved north two feet
to provide a larger tree boulevard between the curb and
sidewalk. The south sidewalk and boulevard elms will be
preserved. The north side elms will be removed and replaced with
a heavy planting of large caliper (4 to 6 inch ) trees of an
undetermined species.
Mr. Metil asked the rationale for sawing down perfectly good
trees. Mr. Sand explained there was a concern that the -trees are
susceptible to Dutch elm disease and may be lost in the future;
that the trees were disfigured due to trimming over the years to
clean the overhead power lines and that the root structure would
be severely damaged due to excavation for the curb and storm
sewer work on the south side and due to cutting for underground
power and sidewalk construction on the north side, damaging the
health of the trees and or leaving them susceptible to uprooting
during wind storms.
. Mr. Martinson said that there is a mentality in engineering
departments - that typical construction standards must be
followed and any time anything else including trees get in the
way the recommendation is to get rid of them. Almost always then
the people object, however, the engineering department keeps
returning until the objection -dies down and they get their
approvals. Removal of half the elms does not make sense because
the point of elms is to make an arcade with similar trees on both
sides - the.board asked.if the rationale for the 40 foot street
.width was to preserve the trees. Mr. Sand responded that part of
the rational was to preserve the trees; there also was a concern
that,traffic volumes and speed may increase and the proximity
would be a problem for.adjacent dwellings. The existing trees
.are acclimated to the heavy traffic and salt conditions and that
new trees may be difficult to establish. The new trees installed
west of Wooddale Avenue were fortunate to have one of the mildest
winters during the last 50.years.
The Board discussed the notification of the neighbors and
the lack of any.serious objection. Mr. Martinson argued that the
boulevard Elms on West 50th Street are a major community asset
that transcends local consideration. However, the issue has been
decided and cannot be changed at this time. No further action
taken.
Mr. Sand said the West 50th Street project also includes the
reconstruction of a stone retaining wall in front of the George
W. Baird House at 4400 West 50th Street. This is a National
Register of Historic Places property and is zoned Heritage
Preservation District by the City, therefore, it is under the
purview of the Heritage Preservation Board. He presented a copy
of the 1926 Hennepin County right -of -way plan for West 50th
Street construction indicating the retaining wall and entrance
monuments were not in place prior to construction and the wall
was probably installed to accommodate cuts made during that
project. Jack and Marilyn Curtis, the owners of the Baird House
indicated that "poppa Darr" constructed the wall from stones
salvaged from the foundation of the sheep shed or .other out
buildings previously located in the area occupied by Edina
Court. The wall is constructed of limestone and has some
fieldstone exposed. The wall and stones are crumbling and
require maintenance.
Mr. Martinson said it would be appropriate to review more
detail plans if the wall must be removed. The typical retaining
walls constructed in the City do not have appropriate standards
detailing such as cap stones lips or drips. Mr. Martinson moved
that the Board remind the Engineering Department that the Baird
House is a National Register Site and a HPD Zoned site and the
Board is concerned about the removal and replacement of the
corner piers and the wall. That the Board would like to review
their general drawings, their wall sections specifications and
material specifications prior to doing any work. Mrs. Wilder
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Mr. Stuart and Mr. Martinson said that the portion of West 50th
Street west of Wooddale was improved substantially in its
functional characteristics by the reconstruction project.
B. General. Mr. Sand said that the Country Club District
has lost a number of boulevard elms to Dutch elm disease and the
owners in some cases are replacing those trees with a variety of
tree types in an uncoordinated fashion. The Park Department has
replaced two boulevard trees with 3" to 4" caliper hackberry at
the southwest corner of Drexel Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The
City Forester feels Hackberry is a wonderful species that is
disease free at the present time and the scale, shape, color,
texture and growth characteristic is very similar to the American
Elm and thus represents an ideal replacement for missing elms.
Mr. Sand expressed concern that Hackberry is not an elm and
wide spread use of Hackberry and other varieties of boulevards
trees will adversely affect the historic integrity and visual
continuity of the Country Club District. He related contacts
with Mr. Donald Willeke, chairman of the Minnesota State Shade
Tree Conference who advocated the use of several varieties of
disease resistant.elm that have been recently developed.
Two varieties of disease resistant elm, the Regal Elm and
the Sapporo Autumn Gold Elm are available from McKay Nursery
Company is Waterloo, Wisconsin. Mr. Sand presented brochures
illustrating the trees and scientific reports on the disease
testing conducted by Dr. Smalley at the University of Wisconsin.
The Regal Elm has an open branching characteristic and the
sapporo Autumn Gold Elm has more dense foliage. The maximum size
available at the present time is • 1 -1/4" to 1 -1/2" caliper which
means they would have to be planted in the City nursery before
placement in the boulevard. Both trees are new cultivars and the
mature size and life span is subject to speculation; they are
crosses between the Korean Elm and the Japanese Elm.
Mr.Martinson said the key to a good replacement is not the
leaf structure but the branching structure to replace the arching
characteristic of the American Elm. In the East, they replaces
elms with Silver Maple. He related the experience in Grundy
Center, Iowa where all the elms were replaced with Chrimson King
Maples and now, 25 years later, the mature trees have a low
branch structure with heavy shade and the streets and sidewalks
are very dark, the grass doesn't grow and you can't see houses
anymore. The replacement trees should be oriented to species
with arching branch structure over the street.
The Board generally discussed different tree characteristics
and potential courses of action. Mr. Sand said it would be
desirable to have the neighborhood respond in an organized .
fashion and order similar trees in quantity . rather than replacing
trees in a piecemeal fashion. Mr. Metil indicated that the City
could provide leadership with a quality discount so there was a
financial incentive for the owners. Mrs. Wilder indicated the
Regal Elm looked promising and she was familiar with McKay
Nursery and the horticultural work done at the University of
Wisconsin. This is an excellent idea.
Mr. Sand recommended the Board attempt to develop support
for the program from the neighborhood rather than trying to
impose a solution from the City to the neighborhood. Perhaps
members of the Board that live in the District could pursue the
.issue to gain support. No further action taken.
III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT -SOUND WALL
Mr. Sand said this item was for information only at this
time. The Board may receive a specific proposal for formal
consideration at a later date. The property owners at the west
end of Sunnyside Road, adjacent to Minnesota Trunk Highway 100
have requested construction of a sound wall extending from the
creek to 44th Street. The Minnesota Highway. Department requested
comments from the Edina Engineering Department. There is no
precise location or design specifications to review. The
residents refer to existing sound walls constructed in the City
and this may refer to the wall constructed north of the Crosstown
Highway and west of Gleason Road in the Gleason Court Addition.
The Board generally.agreed that the Country Club District
Dwellings would benefit from a sound wall. No further action
taken
IV. 1885 U.S. Census
Mr. Sand presented portions of the data base he -is
developing from the 1885 U.S. Census. The study is attempting
to locate residents from the census with property owners and
houses illustrated on the 1886 county maps. The study may be
useful for the celebration of the City Centennial in 1988. The
data base can be sorted to gain demographic information about
Edina residents of the period.
V. Historic Buildings
Mr. Sand presented a letter to Dr. and Mrs. Paul Carson
proposing HPD Zoning of the Carson House (1941), 6001 Pine Grove
Road. The last house designed by William Purcell. Dr. Carson
has full documentation of the design as well as correspondence
with the architect. However, Dr. Carson declined to consent to
HPD Zoning at the present time.
The Board generally agreed that this was a desirable
approach that should be pursued with Trinity Chapel (18732), 4924
France Avenue South now known as Sheridan's Decorating Studio.
No further action taken.
VI. Historical Organization Meeting
Mr. Sand said the Minnesota Historical Society is sponsoring
a conference or with a section for Heritage Preservation Board.
(April 3 -4, 1987) The City will reimburse the registration fee
of any members who wish to attend.
VII. National Preservation Week May 6 -10, 1987,
Mr. Sand said the City could sponsor a program this year to
generate interest in preservation and the forthcoming centennial
celebration. No action taken..
VIII.Other Business:
A. Norway Tour and Festival -The Board received information
about a festival in Bardu, Troms County Norway, seeking
immigrants who wished to retrace their "roots" in Norway.
B. Mission Statement. Mr. Stuart explained that he
attended the recent meeting concerning the City's Mission
Statement Copies will be distributed to the Board.
C. Peterson House, 312 Interlachen Bouelvard.
Mr. Sand advised the Board that the HPD Zoning has been
approved by theCity Council and the City Attorney will file a
copy of the Ordinance with Hennepin County Recorder's office.
D. 4900 Arden Avenue
Mr. Sand indicated this dwelling is constructed on two
platted lots. Mr. Gustafson has indicated that he plans to
purchase the property and attempt to construct a new dwelling
similar to the house at 4528 Bruce Avenue. The existing house
may be constructed too close -to the common property line to
permit a new dwelling.
E. Edina Theatre, 3911 West 50th Street
Mr. Sand indicated that Plitt Theatres, Owner of the Edina
Theatre was acquired by Cineplex Odeon of Canada and they
proposed to rebuild the theatre. The plans have not been
submitted, however, they are discussing a significant increase in
seating.
F. Mayor's Award for Design Excellence.
Mr. Sand presented draft of a concept for annual awards
for projects that improve the quality of the built environment in
Edina. The categories include: Architecture, Landscape
Architecture, Engineering, Signage, Historic Preservation,
Governmental and Rehabilitation
IX. Next Meeting Date:
April 28, 1987 at 7:30 p.m.
X. Adjournment:
r
Mr. Martinson moved adjournment at 9:35 p.m. Mr. Gepner
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Respectfully submitted.,
k0fficiai Puoiicacionj
CITY OF EDINA X.A.
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED
ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OF
GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of
the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will meet on May 4,
1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th
Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting
a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue its general
obligation tax increment refunding bonds (the Refunding Bonds),
in order to refund in advance of their maturity all or a
portion of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds,
Series 1985,.dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal
amount of $12,000,000 (the Series 1985 Bonds). The maximum
aggregate principal amount of the Refunding Bonds is $13,200,000.
The Prior Bonds were used to finance public
redevelopment costs incurred by the City and the Housing
and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City (the HRA)
in connection with the Edinborough Development presently
being constructed in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area.
The Edinborough Development is generally located in the extreme
southeast corner of the corporate limits of the City. The
Ed.inborough Development is a mixed use development containing
• commercial office building, a condominium housing project,
• multifamily elderly rental housing facility, and a public
park and other public amenities. The initial owner of the
commercial office building is Edinborough Office East Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; the initial
owner of the condominium housing project is the Edinborough
Condominium Partnership, a Minnesota general.partnership;
the initial owner of the multifamily rental housing facility
is Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota
limited partnership; and the initial owner of the public
park and other public amenities is the HRA.
The principal of and.interest on the Refunding
Bonds are expected to be paid from tax increments to be derived
from the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area, but if necessary
for the payment of such principal and interest, ad valorem
taxes will be required to be levied on all taxable property
within the corporate limits of the City.
All persons interested may appear and be heard
at the time and place set forth above, or may file written
comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing
set forth above.
Dated: April 15, 1987.
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
By /s /Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
19ST CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 1
- - -- CHECK NO - AMOUNT----- _- . -_ -__ VENDOR __- ..__...____.._.- __ - -_I TEM__DESCR.I.PTI.ON AC.COUNLJVQ___INV M_P_._O -. -M_ MESSAGE -.
1" 111317 04/22/87 228.30- LAWSON PRODUCTS CORRECTION 40- 4540- 803 -80
- - - -1 1 -1317 - - ---- 04/22/87 -- -- 228. -30 -- ----- LAWSON._PRODUCTS REPAIR -PARTS 40-45.40.- 8.03-80. —____- ._._ ..
.00 t
— - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- _ i i i -CK S
124002 04/29/87 10.92 AT d T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51
- -- 124002 - -- 04/-29/87- __35.36 --------AT-. &. T_-_--- -_ -_ -- _.._.GEN - UP_PLIF-S f- 0m4504_133 -12 _
46.28 s
- - -.- 124003 -- - - -- 04/29/8 -7 -- - 261_- 14-_--.__ .ALBINSON--- .-- _- .____GEN�LPPLY 105-04.- 25.0-26__38414.3__...
' 261.14 *
124008 04/22/87 30.30 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66
124008 - 04/ 22/-87 152 -32 KAMAN_BEARING. -A. -SPLY REP_A.I.R- PARTS 40- 4540_803- 80- 616_t40
182.62 *
124013
124013
124013
' 124013
124018
No
- - - - -- 124026
124026
124026
-- - 124026
°i 124026
a.
04/22/87 66.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 335 -30 1293
04/22/87 1- 14 -_80 -- ALTERNATOR.. REBUILD REPAIR_PAR,TS 10=4540- 560 - 56_1281.
04/22/87 116.62 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 1283
04/22/87 221.16 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1291
04/29/87 6.75 AT R T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE
6.75 *
50- 4256 - 821 -82
* ** -CKS .
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
* ** -CKS
—04/23/87_—
-- 18.94
BADGER
METER
-INC-
- WATER - METERS
40_1220- 0.00 - 00.484350. -
04/23/87
940.28
BADGER
METER
INC
WATER METERS
40- 1220 - 000 -00 484340
04/27/87
1,203.60
BADGER
METER
INC
WATER SUPPLIES
40 -1220- 000 -00 484916
-- - 04/22/87—
- 313.66 - -
- - -- BADGER
METER
- INC - --
REPAIR__PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 - 80__483605.__,__ -
04/22/87
128.83
BADGER
METER
INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80 484197
BROS
2,605.30 t
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 560 -56
287237
124031
I
m
1
1
1
1
f
1
f
* ** —CKS
- -- 124031 - -
-- 04/23/87
- 59.48- - - ----
BERTELSON
-EROS
INC- .- .____
-__ GEN SUPPLIES___
_10- 4504 - 540 -54
288770_ _-
124031
04/22/87
206.00
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
GEN SUPP
10- 4504 - 560 -56
287237
124031
04/29/87
15.80
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 490 -49
290958
--
124031
04/29/87
16 .-76
BERTELSON_BROS.INC
OFFICE -SPLY
1.0__4516- 510 - 51_.290887
- -__
124031
04/29/87
20.36
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SPLY
10- 4516 - 510 -51
290840
124031
04/27/87
71.60
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10 -4516- 510 -51
289189
--124031 -
04/22/87 - --
69-00—
BERTELSON--BROS
_INC -. -
-- PARTS -. -- - -. - -.
1 0= 4620 -560- 56 -
284784 __..__._., _ _...
'i
124031
04/22/87
21.84
BERTELSON
BROS
INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
23- 4516 - 611 -61
284600
K'
480.84
iitii#
* ** -CKS
: ell
-
_111_
1240-33
94/23/87
85-50 - BERGFORD- TRUCKING
INVENT RY
50- 4626_=822 -82
I
m
1
1
1
1
f
1
f
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87
PAGE 2
- CHECK NO
- DATE -- - - - -
- -- AMOUNT - - - -- --
- -- -- VENDOR -
-- ITEM -- DESCRIPT- -ION
SCCOUNT- NO._INV-r-M - -P -0.-- N
MESSAGE -
124033
04/23/87
132.60
BERGFORD TRUCKING
INVENTORY
50- 4626- 842 -84
124033 -- -
- 04/23/87 - - -
-- 1 12.30
BERGFORD -- TRUCKING
- INVENTORY
50- 4626--862 -86
-- -
- -- - - --
330.40
-_ - *•* -CKS -
124035
04/23/87
123.48
BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
203493
124035 - -
-- 04/23/87 - - -
- -- - 135. 14-------
BOUSTEAD. -ELEC -d- MFG-
- - - - -, REPAIV- -PARTS
40- 4540 -801-80-
203261 -- - -
- - - -- - -
258.62 •
+
--
- - --
- - *** -CKS
124037
04/22/87
74.00
BRAUN ENG TESTING IN
AIR CONDITING
25- 4946 - 520 -52
00718
- - - -- --
- - - -- --
74:00- *-----
_. -- - -- __ -
- - - - ---
- -
•s *s **
* ** -CKS
124039
04/22/87
1,297.96
BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 003 -20
1,297.96
124040
04/29/87
53.85
BURGER BROS.
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47
53.85 t
124041
04/29/87
33.56
BURY d CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
26201
124041
04/27/87
294.75
BURY d CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
124041- ----
04/27/87 -
-11- ,594.98-
-- BURY- d CARLSON INC -
- -- BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314-30
- - - -- --
- - - --
124041
04/29/87
13,962.51
BURY & CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
26201
124041
04/27/87
187.92
BURY d CARLSON INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4540 - 540 -54
- - --
—
26-r 4)73 -72-*
*** -CKS
!
124047
04/29/87
13.15
BROWN PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10- 4508 - 440 -44
453402
,
13.15
*r* -CKS
124054 - -
-- 04/22/87 - --
123.60-
- BATTERY - WAREHOUSE -
- - -- REPAIR - -PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
90369--------
-
124054
04/23/87
111.00
BATTERY WAREHOUSE
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
94955
,
234.60 t
----
- - -•
ttt* **
---- - - - - --
--
** -CKS
�
-
- 124061 - -
- 04/29/87 —
- -A 0 -. 68
- - - - "A" -PLUS PRESORT -
- -- POSTAGE- -
1 0- 4290 - 510 -51
-- - - - - -- --
124061
04/29/87
20.30
°A° PLUS PRESORT
POSTAGE
10- 4290 - 510 -51
,
30.98
124062
04/22/87
210.00
BROCK WHITE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 540 -54
195797
,
210.00
---- -
-
- - - - - -- - --
--
* * t * * * -
- - - --
- --------
--
r t * -CKS
�
-
- -- 1240,66—
04/23/87
78.56 -
—CDP- -
— GEN - SUP -PLIES
10= 4504 - 540 4-
724754- - -
- - -- - -
;�
78.56 r
-- - - -- - -- -
-- - - -
- - * *t -CKS
1987 CITY OF EDINA
-- - -- CHECK NO..- DATE - - - - --
-- 124074 -- - - - --- 04/29/87. - - --
CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 3
AMOUNT -- _VENDOR___.__ _- .__-- ____ITEM_DESCRIP- -T.IDN ACCOUNT-NO- INV_ -M -P .0._ -N MESSAGE _
22, 925.00--- - - - - -- CITY - -OF -- BLOOMINGTON -- __._SERVI_CES- -1 -0- 4201_ - 480 - 48_3492 -____
22,925.00 r
95
CORRECT.ION__ _.-
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF COMMODITIES
REPAIR PARTS
23- 4624- 613 -61
23 -4624- 613- 61_ - --
23- 4624 - 613 -61
23- 4624- 613-61 947891
27 -4540- 664 -66 26018
048072
trs -CKS
- -- tss -CKS
------
- -- - --
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
10 -4574- 440 -44
_
124082
04/29/87
290.00
CONWAY FIRE d SAFETY
27- 4642- 661 -66
124082
-- 04/29/87---- --
- - - -- 180.00 -----.CONWAY
FIRE -d SAFETY
124082
04/27/87
102.00
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
124082
04/27/87
53.50
CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY
-
-
-- ---625-
50- -t
- -- -- - - - -
WATER
rsssrs
SUPPLY
GEN SUPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
16452
124091
04/27/87
121.5s
CITY OF EDINA
-. -MERIT
124091
04/27/87
191.62
CITY OF EDINA
_
124091 - --
04/27/87
- 27._ -10
CITY- OF_EDINA___.
SUPPLY
124091
04/27/87
30.03
CITY OF EDINA
°
124091
04/27/87
27.10
CITY OF EDINA
-2
10- 4504 - 646 -64
-
-39 -7x4 0 -r
-- -- - - - -- - --
-- 04/22/87-
124092
04/22/87
2,310.10
C d S DIST INC
-
- 124092-
- 04/22/87 --
2,- 310. -10--
C._3__S DIST INC----.---
476.40
124092
04/22/87
21.86
C d S DIST INC
16542
124092
04/22/87
263.00
C 6 S DIST INC
' - --
- - - -----
- - -- -- -
- - - -- 284_86 -t
_
--
•sssst
04/22/87
---453..25
MERIT.
- SUPPLY - - --
PARTS.-
_10- 4620- 560 - 56.16510.
- -_ -_
124125
124099
04/22/87
76.03
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO
•
28- 4248 - 702 -70
16552
76.03 •
124125
04/22/87
ttsrrs
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
95
CORRECT.ION__ _.-
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF COMMODITIES
REPAIR PARTS
23- 4624- 613 -61
23 -4624- 613- 61_ - --
23- 4624 - 613 -61
23- 4624- 613-61 947891
27 -4540- 664 -66 26018
048072
trs -CKS
- -- tss -CKS
-
-- - - - - -- - - t s t -CKS
PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
10 -4574- 440 -44
91560
- EQUIP - -- REPLACEMENT_
10 -4901- 440 -44-
91560 -__ _-
SAFETY EQUIP
27- 4642- 661 -66
91365
SAFETY EQUIP
27- 4642- 661 -66
91366
rst -CKS
WATER
10- 4258 - 520 -52
WATER
10- 4258 - 540 -54
_- WATER
1 0- 4258 - 646 -64
rrr -CKS
WATER
50- 4258 - 821 -82
04/22/87
WATER
50- 4258 - 861 -86
SUPPLY
95
CORRECT.ION__ _.-
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF COMMODITIES
REPAIR PARTS
23- 4624- 613 -61
23 -4624- 613- 61_ - --
23- 4624 - 613 -61
23- 4624- 613-61 947891
27 -4540- 664 -66 26018
048072
trs -CKS
- -- tss -CKS
124111 - -
- -- 04/23/87-
- 200 -.00
DAVIS-.WA-TER-EQUIP__CO
CONST
200.00 r
rrr -CKS
T
124125
04/22/87
247.75
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
16452
-
-- 124125-
- 04/22/87
- .298.75 -
-. -MERIT
. SUPPLY---- _-- . - -____
-GEN- .SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 - 30_16446_
_
124125
04/22/87
358.50
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
124125
04/22/87
375.86
MERIT
SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
16468
- - --
124125 - -
-- 04/22/87-
-- 448.44 - --
MERIT
SUPPLY - -.- ----- .-- . -
-. -__ GEN SUPPLIES
- -10- 4504 - 646 -64
16467.- - -. - -.
124125
04/23/87
476.40
MERIT
SUPPLY
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
16542
s..
124125
04/22/87
453.25
MERIT
SUPPLY
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
16476
--
- 124125
04/22/87
---453..25
MERIT.
- SUPPLY - - --
PARTS.-
_10- 4620- 560 - 56.16510.
- -_ -_
124125
04/22/87
122.75
MERIT
SUPPLY
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248 - 702 -70
16552
124125
04/22/87
451.50
MERIT
SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
28- 4512 - 702 -70
16554
124125 -
-- - 04/29/87-- --
- - -- 453.25 --
- MERIT -
SUPPLY------ - - -
- -- GEN SUPPLIES-
- - -40- 4504 - 801 -80
- 16610.------ -. - - -- ....
124125
04/22/87
112.00
MERIT
SUPPLY
PAINT
40- 4544- 801 -80
16489
JI
4, 251 .70 r
124126
04/29/87
215.25
DAVIS
EUGENE
WEED INSPECTION
10- 4100 - 985 -90
124126
04/29/87
34.23
DAVIS
EUGENE
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 985 -90
1987 L_ .
OF EDINA
CHECK STER
05- 04 -8', +GE 4
- CHECK NO— DATE------ - - - -
-- AMOUNT- - - - - -- ----
- - -- -- VENDOR - - -- - - - - --
- - - - -- ITEM-- DESCRIPT- ION
- ACCOUNT-NO_INV-_.*-P-,O.-S-
MESSAGE --
,
249.48 #
-------------
-- - - --
- - - -- -
ss# -CKS
�
- -- 124130 -----04/22/87--
—
- - -- 81 -90 - --
-- DUNE - BUGGY -- SUPPLY—
-CONT- R EPA IRS
28 -4248- 704 -70 --
22502 -
- -- - -- - --
81.90 #
•
-- - - - - -- -
-- - .
* ** -CKS
124132
04/29/87
345.00
PHYSIO CONTROL
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 440 -44
A27775
•
- -- _ _--- -.
- - -- - - - -- -
- -- - - - - -- 345.- 00- -• - - --
- -- -- — - —
='
*** -CKS
•
124136
04/23/87
73.73-
EARL F ANDERSEN
CORRECTION
10- 4212- 510 -51
•
124136
04/23/87
73.73
EARL F ANDERSEN
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 510 -51
69027
- 124136--
-- 04/23/87-
— 93:73—
— EARL - -F -- ANDERSEN - -
-- -ADVERT -1-SING
1- 0- 42- 1- 2 -5" -51 -69027
- -- - --
93.73 i
•
- 124137 - --
04/29/87 - -
125.20 -
- E KRAEMER & SONS INC
-- -GEN SUPPLIES - - --
10 -4504- 358 -30
81437 --
- --
124137
04/22/87
133.64
E KRAEMER 6 SONS INC
CLASS V MATERIALS
10- 4532 - 314 -30
81145
•
3i 124137
04/23/87
122.82
E KRAEMER 3 SONS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
40- 4504 - 801 -60
81336
- -- - - --
381 -66-*
---
--
-- -
"
* ** -CKS
_ 124158
04/29/87
172.42
FEED RITE CONTROL
CHEMICALS
26- 4564- 682 -68
84619
,
124158
04/23/87
2,125.80-
FEED RITE CONTROL
CREDIT
40- 4622- 803 -80
53395
- -- 124158 -
-- 04/23/87
-- 2,399.. -30
— FEED RITE - CONTROL-
WATER- SUPPLIES
40 -4622- 803 -80
84027--------
- --
124158
04/23/87
1,652.48
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER SUPPLIES
40- 4622 - 803 -80
84028
124158
04/23/87
740.00
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER SUPPLIES
40- 4622- 805 -80
84007
--- - -- - -
- - - - -- - --
- -- 2x838 -40 -
- -
- --- -- -
—
- -
- - -
"
t ** -CKS
*ss *s#
_ 124160
04/23/87
121.00
FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
32616
,
121.00 s
-- 124162 - - --
04/22/87
- - - -- 16.24-
-- FOWLER ELECTRIC ---- -
- - - -- REPAIR PARTS-
27- 4540 - 664 -66-
6405 -7—
_ 124162
04/22/87
53.80
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
,
70.04
------
- - - ---
----- -
- - - --
-
ss* -CKS
124167-
-- 04/29/87 --
- -- 975.00 - - -
-- FIRST NATIONAL BANK - -
- -- INTEREST - BONDS--
27--4300- 661 -66
— --
- - - - --
975.00
- - - -- -
- - --
*i* -CKS
124183
04/23/87
30.00
BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 520 -52
72084
------- ._....
— --
30:00 -s --
--- - - - - --
--
- --
SGI
* ** -CKS
*ti*is
,
1987 CITY OF EDINA
04/29/87
- - -- 124188 -
CHECK
NO -, -- DATE - - -- --
124185
- -- 04/22/87
124185
04/22/87
a 124185
04/22/87
- - 124185
- -- 04/22/87
-. -- __..._ -GEN
SUPPLIES
124188
04/29/87
- - -- 124188 -
-- 04/23/87
124188
04/23/87
124188
04/23/87
- 124188 --
04/23/87
* -
O
---- - - - - -- 145.00 -----------
+ *** ** - -- - - -- - - -- - - --- - -- ------- -' - --- * ** -CKS
124192 04/22/87 224.50 WEST WELD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-646 -64 64642
124192 - - - - -- 04/22/8 -7- - - - -- - 106- ,65----- - -. - -- -WEST- WELD------ - - - - -- WELDING - SUPPLIES-- 1- 0--46 -10_- 560 =56- 6497 -0-_._ _
331.15 *
-- * * * * ** -
CHECK
REGISTER
-- --
- - - - -- - - -
05 -04 -87 PAGE 5
-- AMOUNT----,- --------,---VENDOR-.-
-- ---- -._ * *r -CKS
---- - -. - --
ITEM- .DESCRIP -ION
ACCOUNT -NO -- INV_ -N -P .0.- N MESSAGE - --
---- - - - - -- 145.00 -----------
GOODIN CO---- - - - - --
-. -- __..._ -GEN
SUPPLIES
-10- 4504 - 358 -30
424982 - - - --
77.50
GOODIN CO
- - -- GENERAL --
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 358 -30
421947
147.50
GOODIN CO
04/27/87
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
421649
---200.13 -------
GOODIN- CO-- _ - -.
-.- _ --REPAIR-PARTS
124194
4.0= 4540.-8.03 -80 --
422420.-- .- .-- ._ -__...
570.13 +
COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP REP
10- 4901 - 650 -64
- - -- - - - - -- - --
-- - - -- - -- -
--- - - -- - --
-'- - * * * - CK S
- -- - - -
- - - -- - - - --
15.22
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
336936
- - - -- -95.28 ---GRAYBAR-ELECTRIC-CO
_ 124202
- -. - - -- ..REPAIR-
-PARTS
10- 4540 - 640 - 64.330735
SHOOTERS
95.28
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 640 -64
330735
95.28-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO
CORRECTION
10- 4540 - 640 -64
330735
- -- 305. -13 -
GRAYBAR- ELECTRIC-
-CO -- ----
-CONST
60= 4-300-264-04-
331427 --
415.63 *
* * * * **
+ *** ** - -- - - -- - - -- - - --- - -- ------- -' - --- * ** -CKS
124192 04/22/87 224.50 WEST WELD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-646 -64 64642
124192 - - - - -- 04/22/8 -7- - - - -- - 106- ,65----- - -. - -- -WEST- WELD------ - - - - -- WELDING - SUPPLIES-- 1- 0--46 -10_- 560 =56- 6497 -0-_._ _
331.15 *
-- * * * * ** -
-
--
-- --
- - - - -- - - -
--
-
-- ---- -._ * *r -CKS
a - 124194
04/29/87
24.80
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
76104
124194 - - -
-- 04/27/87-------
- - - - -- 125, -00-- .--- - -
- - -- GENERAL --
COMMUNICATNS
- - - -- CORRECTION - - - --
- -1 0 -4901- 650 -64
- - - - - - -- . --
124194
04/27/87
125.00
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP REPACEMENT
10- 4901 - 650 -64
75968
124194
04/27/87
11250.00
GENERAL
COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP REP
10- 4901 - 650 -64
274x80--* -
r *r * **
* ** -CKS
_ 124202
04/29/87
478.10
GOPHERS
SHOOTERS
AMMUNITION
10- 4572- 420 -42
018524
124202
04/27/87
195.67
GOPHERS
SHOOTERS
TARGETS
29- 4648 - 722 -72
019745
,
673.77 - *-
- - --
-----
- - - - - -- -
-- -- -
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
124209
04/23/87
379.50
GENUINE
PARTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
042620
124209
04/22/87
29.88
GENUINE
PARTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
041921
- - - -- 124209 - -
-- 04/22/87- -
-- 29.05
- -- GENUINE
PARTS-- - - - - --
REPAIR -PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56-
041742 - - -- - -
124209
04/22/87
15.60 -
GENUINE
PARTS
CREDIT
10- 4540 - 560 -56
041175
124209
04/23/87
13.92
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
043066
- - 124209 - - --
-04/22/87-------
- - -23. 94 • - - --
GENUINE
PARTS - -- .-- - - - -
-- REPAIR-- PARTS_
-10- 4540-560-56-038630
-- -- - -
124209
04/22/87
18.71
GENUINE
PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
041693
124209
04/23/87
40.00
GENUINE
PARTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
043360
- - 124209----04/-23/87-
75.-90 - --
GENUINE-
PARTS- - - - - --
GEN-SUPPA -IES
40- 504-801 =80-
043359-- .---
595.30 r
** * * ** - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -... - -.. -- -- ----- ._.... -- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- :_. *r* -CKS
+ 124215 04/22/87 5.77 HIRSHFIELDS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 111760
**r -CKS
{r
t
t
t
t
1
0
t
1
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
!
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87
PAGE 6
CHECK NO—
DATE --
— AMOUNT -
- - - -- VENDOR--- - - - - --
-- ITEM -DESCRIPTION
— ACCOUNT-- NO:-- INV- .-- M- P- . -0.- -8
MESSAGE
124238 - -
-- 04/22/87 - - -
- -- - -27.00 -
-- WM H MCCOY— ------
- - - -- GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30-
40101 - - - --
--
124238
04/22/87
27.00
WM H MCCOY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
41060
CO - - --
124304
04/23/87
54.00 +
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
124304
04/23/87
* * * *s*
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
124304 -
-- 04/23/87 - - - --
15:48-----
* ** -CKS
124244 - -
- - -- 04/23/87 - - - - --
--- 253: 88 -------HAYDEN
MURPHY- -
----- REPAI-R- PARTS-
—10- 4540 - 560 -56
--
CO
°
253.88 +
124305
04/22/87
-- ► *** * *- .. -
-- - - -- - - --
-- -- - --
- -- - -
- - - - --
--
- * ** -CKS
-- - --
124253
04/22/87
26.50
HUMPHREY RADIATOR
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
124313 -
- - --
- - - -- --- - - -
- -- 26 -. 50
H FOSTER
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
124278
04/27/87
37.55
JERRYS FOODS
REPAIR PARTS
23- 4540 - 613 -61
37.55 +
* ** -CKS
-- 124286
04/22/87—
79:20
- JUSTUS LUMBER - - --
-- GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 318 -30
49389
- --
124286
04/22/87
53.07
JUSTUS LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
49476
124286
04/22/87
85.12
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
10- 4604- 646 -64
49527
- - -- 124286 - --
04/23/87- --
352:98 - -
---- JUSTUS- LUMBER --
- - - - -- REPAIR -PARTS
27- 4540 - 666 -66-
245 - - - - -- -
--
�,
570.37 +
--
-t ** -CKS
124294 04/23/87 192.51 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52
124294 - -- 04/23/87 - -- 15.32 - - - -- CRESCENT ELECTRIC - -- - -- REPAI- R- PARATS-- - - -40- 4540 - 801- 80 - - --
207.83 •
i 124301 04/27/87 1,430.00 KREMER SPRG. & ALIGN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 17442
_.— - ---------- - - - -1- 430 - 00 --* - --
O
!
124304
04/23/87
31.72
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
124304
04/23/87
39.29
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
- - 124304
-- 04/23/87 — -
-- -221 .06 -
-- KNOX
LUMBER
CO - - --
124304
04/23/87
87.98
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
124304
04/23/87
26.46
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
124304 -
-- 04/23/87 - - - --
15:48-----
- -KNOX
LUMBER
CO - --
124304
04/23/87
35.52
KNOX
LUMBER
CO
°
457.51
124305
04/22/87
27.30
K d K
SALES
27.30
124313 -
-- 04/22/87 - -
- 70.25 -
JOHN
H FOSTER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
-- REPAIR -PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
TOOLS
- -- LUMBER - - - - --
LUMBER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS -
*** -CKS
+ *+ -CKS
10- 4540 - 520 -52 501590
10- 4540 - 520 -52 501681
10- 4540 - 520 -52 501934 - -
10 -4540- 540 -54 501401
10- 4580 - 301 -30 501780
10- 4604- 646 -64- 501657 - - - - - -- -
10- 4604- 646 -64 501665
10- 4540 - 520 -52 99429
- -40- 4540 - 801 -80 - - - - -- - -- -
*** -CKS ,
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87 PAGE 7
- - -- CHECK
NO,- DATE - - --
-- AMOUNT- -------
- - - -.VENDOR-------------- -
- --- ITEM -- DESCRIPTION
.ACCOUNT- NO- .- INV- .- N -_P.0- M MESSAGE
124313
04/22/87
277.24
JOHN H FOSTER
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 805 -80
--
---- - - - - -- -- - - - --
--- - - - - -- 347.49- + - -------------
- - - - -- - - --
- t * * * **
* ** -CKS
124316
04/23/87
337.59
LAMOTTE CHEMICAL
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 482 -48
106605
- _
337.59 +
124317
04/22/87
196.42
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 322 -30
124317
04/22/87
15.54
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 322 -30
124317
- -- 04/22/87 -- --
-- 112, 53 - --
- LAWSON PRODUCTS - --
-GEN- SUPPLIES
10-4504-646-64
-- - -- - -- - -
124317
04/22/87
128.36
LAWSON PRODUCTS
SIGNS & POSTS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
124317
04/22/87
194.64
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
- -- 124317
-- 04/22/87-----------
- - - - -- -t 49.59-
- LAWSON PRODUCTS - - --
- -. -- PARTS- - - - - --
-10- 4620- 560- 56----
- - - - -- --
124317
04/22/87
287.84
LAWSON PRODUCTS
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
124317
04/22/87
228.30
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
124318
04/22/87
29.70
LEEF BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
* * *t **
* ** -CKS "
124324
- -
04/29/87
- - -- - --
2,369.40
- -- - - - - -- - - - --
LOGIS
.._.. - - --------- ,. - --
COMPUTER BILLING
-- - --
10- 4233 - 160 -16
- - - - - --
. 124324
04/29/87
2,526.64
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
10 -4233- 200 -20
- - - -- 04/29/87 - - - --
-2, 259. 1 0 - --
-- -LOGIS -- --- -- - - -. ---COMPUTER
BILLING
1 0- 4233 - 420 -42
124324
04/29/87
2,342.92
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
40- 4233 - 800 -80
- 124324
04/29/87
274.87
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
50- 4233 - 820 -82
- -- 124324 -
- - 04/29/87-
274.87-
- LOGIS- --
— COMPUTER - BILLING
50- 4233 - 840- 84---------
- -. - -.
124324
04/29/87
274.88
LOGIS
COMPUTER BILLING
50- 4233 - 860 -86
10,322.68 +
t * *t **
--- - - - - --
* ** -CKS
- -- 124342
- -- 04/22/87-
- ---. -- 352.01 --
MAC QUEEN EQUIP -- INC - - -
- -- REPAIR - PARTS
10-4540-560-56-72808-
.. -
124342
04/22/87
25.91
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
72626
377.92 +
124343
04/22/87
116.75
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
12106
124343
04/22/87
31.82
MINNESOTA GLOVE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560 -56
12146
-- 124343 -
- - - -- 04/22/87-
- -- -59.66 --
- - - - -- MINNESOTA - GLOVE-- - - - - --
-.GEN- SUPPLIES
10-4504- 646- 64
---- --- . - - -_-
208.23 s
-- 124344
- - - - - -- 04/29/57 --_
--- _._.22.05-- - -
- - -- MED OXYGEN & EQUIP - -
- - -- -EQUIP MAINT -
-10- 4274- 440- 44-------
- - - - -- -
124344
04/29/87
31.73
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44
* 124344
04/29/87
32.33
MED OXYGEN E EQUIP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10 -4510- 440 -44
+
+ * * * ++
++* -CKS
124346
04/29/87
217,752.34
MET N WASTE C L COMM
SEWER SERVICE
40- 4312- 812 -80
4109
217,752.34 +
* * * -CKS
- - - - - -- 124355---
- - - - -- 04/29/8 -7 --
4-3-3 -1
- -NAIL- GUARDIAN - -SYST
-- ALARM - SERVICE
234304- 6 -t2-61-
12304 - - - - -- --
� f
1987 CIFY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87
PAGE 8
CHECK NO.-DATE
- - - - -
- -- AMOUNT--------- - -
- - -- -- -- -- VENDOR -- - - --
ITEM- DESCRIPT -ION
ACCOUNT - NO.-- INV.-M P:O. A
MESSAGE
124358
04/29/87
2,890.20
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERV
27- 4304 - 662 -66
12161
- 1243S8
04/29/87
-- -- 100.15 - --
- NATL GUARDIAN SYST-- - - - - --
ALARM -SERV
28- 4304 - 702 -70
-12163 -
124358
04/29/87
141.42
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
50- 4304 - 821 -82
124358
04/23/87
157.39
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM SERVICE
50- 4304 - 861 -86
- - -- - - -- -- -
- - - -- - --
— 3,42287- t--
- - - - --
124359
04/22/87
160.37
MINN TORO INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
648134
124359 -
- 04/22/87 - - -
- - - -- 13.99 -
- -- MINN TORO INC - - -- -- --
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
647985
124359
04/22/87
142.14
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
648092
124359
04/29/87
46.80
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
651554
- - -- 124359 --
04/27/87 - - - --
- - - - -- 89.97 - -
- -- MINN TORO INC ------ - - - - --
REPAIR -PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
651005 - --
124359
04/29/87
175.24-
MINN TORO INC
CREDIT
27- 4540 - 664 -66
C78715
278.03 s
124360
04/23/87
16.80
MINNESOTA WANNER
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 325 -30
065552
124360
04/23/87
49.50
MINNESOTA WANNER
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
065534
- -- 124360 - -
04/23/87
- 57 -.00
-- MINNESOTA - WANNER
GEN- SUPPL -IES
26- 4504 - 682 -68-
065804-- ------
123.30
-- --i *1111 .._.---
------ -- --'--
-- --- -'- -- -'- - - --- -- -- -------
- ---- --
* ** -CKS
-
124381
04/27/87
135.84
STAR 6 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10 -4212- 510 -51
- - - -- 124381- -
04/27/87-
169.80
-- STAR - -3- TRIBUNE-
- ADVERT -ISING
1.0- 4242- 51.0 -5 -1
- - - - --
305.64
- -- -
- - - -- -
*** -CKS
124400
04/23/87
21.70
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES
10- 4616- 560 -56
- - - - -- - --
21- . -70 -s
* ** -CKS
124406
04/23/87
84.92
NTCC INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 440 -44
M84385
' 124406
04/23/87
177.96
NTCC INC
REPAIR PARATS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
M84249
-- - -- - --
--
262: 88 - *-
* *isis
* ** -CKS
124413
04/23/87
316.61
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
' 124413
04/23/87
86.50
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
12441 -3 —
04/23/87 - --
126:72 -
NATIONWIDE PAPERS- - - - - --
GEN -- SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664- 66
- - - -- - - - -
- --
529.83
-- -- — --
- - - -- - -
- s* *-CKS
124417
04/29/87
116.60
OFFSET PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 490 -49
27344
- - - -- -
-
' -16-. 60-
* * *s **
* ** -CKS
124421
04/27/87
170.08
OLSON CHAIN d CABLE
TOOLS
27- 4580 - 664 -66
2270
'
170.08
s * *ss*
*** -CKS
124452 -
- 04/22/87 -
- - -- — 33.26 - --
-- QUICK SERV BATTERY----.------
REPAIR- PARTS —-
10 -4540- 560 -56
- 14261- - - - - --
--
1987•CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87
PAGE 9
CHECK -NO,-
DATE- - - - - --
AMOUNT-----------
.. -. - -- .. _._- VENDOR. -. - .- _.- .-- .- .____.-
_.._.ITEM- DESCRIPT -ION
- ACCOUNT-- NO.-- INV -. - - -# P -. -O.- k
MESSAGE
124452
04/22/87
6.89
QUICK SERV BATTERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
14290
124452 -- -
- - - -- 04/22/87----
--_. - - - -- 82,84 - - --
-- -QUICK SERV - BATTERY
- REPAIR- PARTS --
10- 4540 - 560 -56
15445 - .
122.99
- - - -- - ---
-- -
.. -. -s** -CKS
- - - --
- - - - - -- --
124457
04/22/87
216.75
R.L.000LD & CO.INC.
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
03320
•
124457 - -
-- 04/22/87 - -
- - -- - - -.- 54.77--- -------
- - - -R. L.000LD- d-- CO.INC.- .-
- - -. -- REPAIR -PARTS
27 -4540- 664 -66-
03321 - - - - -.
271.52
"
e
---- - - - - -- --
- ----- -
* * * -CKS
- - -- -
124462
04/22/87
32.85
RENTAL EQUIP d SALES
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 646-64
5546
-- 124462- - - - --
04/22/87 - --
- 51 -. 85 - - - --
--.RENTAL- EQUIP & SALES-----
- -TOOS -
+- 0=4580- 644 -64.
5973----
84.70 •
t * * s * * -- --
— — - - --
-
- - -- -- - -- -- -- - - -
•
-. * * *- CKS
--
— - - -- -
124465
04/22/87
30.00
RICHFIELD PLUMB d CO
CONT REPAIRS
28- 4248- T02 -70
2785
•
s * *ss*
* ** -CKS •
124473
04/22/87
51.76
R.E. MOONEY 6 ASSOC.
PAINT
40- 4544 - 801 -80
7124
'
51.76
* ** -CKS
- - - -- 124484-
04/-29/87
.1- 16 -.61
AMERICAN - SHARECOM -_
TELEP -MONE
10a4256_S -L0- 51_.75548
- -____
116.61
•
* ***st__ . --
- - - - --
-- -- ._..._...__.. ----
- - - - --
---- - - - - -- -
- - - - -- -- ._
. * ** -CKS
- - --
124490
04/22/87
148.84
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
10- 4544 - 325 -30
•
124490 -
04/22/87 - --
—23-98---SHERWIN
WILLIAMS --
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64__
____-
124490
04/22/87
49.75
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646 -64
124490
04/23/87
43.95
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
PAINT
27- 4544 - 662 -66
•
- - - - --
---------- -- -
- - - - 266 -_52 -s
s*ts **
*** -CKS •
124492
04/23/87
38.78
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARAS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
143121
124492
04/23/87
28.78
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540-560 -56
142587
•
124492 -
--04/23/87 --
--- - - - - -- -24.06-
- SOUTHDALE -FORD
CORREC-TION=
-10-4540-S60-56-
- - _- _
124492
04/23/87
10.87
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
143280
124492
04/23/87
38.78
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
142587
•
- 124492 - - - --
04/23/87-
-- 28.78-
-- SOUTHDALE- FORD - - - -
-- CORRECTION --
1 -0- 4540 - 560 -56
124492
04/23/87
74.05
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
142305
1-�8 -43-*
•
t * *s *t
*** -CKS
- - - - -- 124502 - - - --
04/23/87
21- .50 -
-- SUBURBAN - CHEVROLET-
CONT- REPAIRS
10- 4248-S60-56-43959--__
124502
04/23/87
192.50
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
1536
124502
04/23/87
8.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71939
J
�
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87
.-AGE 10
CHECK
NO.- DATE - - --
AMOUNT------ - - -
- -- - -• -- VENDOR - - - - - --
ITEM -DESCRIPTION
- ACCOUNT- NO. -INV. # P -O. - -#
MESSAGE -
124502
04/23/87
.72
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS..
10- 4540-560 -56
71701
124502
-- 04/23/87 --
— - - - - -- -30.78 - --
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET - - - --
REPAIR PARTS
-10- 4540 - 560 -56
71074
124502
04/23/87
134.00
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71269
124502
04/23/87
23.20
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71981
124502
- - 04/23/87 — -
— 192.56 - -
- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET - -- --
REPAIR PARTS-
-10- 4540 - 560 -56
71537 - -- -
124502
04/23/87
8.55
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71182
124502
04/23/87
28.68
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
71746
_ _ -
- - -- - - -- - ----
- - - - -- -640.49--* —
- -- -. -- -
124503
04/22/87
8.08
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
- 124503
— 04/23/87 --
-- -16.31 --
- SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP - -- --
REPAIR PARR
10- 4540 - 520- 52
- - -- - - - - --
124503
04/23/87
45.08
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
124503
04/29/87
34.38
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
CONT REPAIRS
26- 4248 - 682 -68
- 124503
---04/22/87-----
-- -- 25.51- ---------SUBURBAN
PLUMB SUP - - - - --
REPAI -R- PARTS --
-40- 4540- 803 -80
--- - - - - -- -- -
129.36 t
-- tss *s*
--
* ** -CKS
- -
--- - - - - --
- -- -
--
- --
124505
04/29/87
85.41
SUN
ADVERTISING
10- 4210 - 140 -14
ssssss
* ** -CKS
124508
04/29/87
1.47
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 420 -42
31175
124508
04/29/87
7.56
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
31516
124508
- - -- 04/29/87 -- -
- - - -- 7.67 - --
ST PAUL BOOK - - ---- --
GEN SUPPLIES --
10 -4504- 440 -44
31513 - -- --
124508
04/29/87
56.42
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47
31136
124508
04/29/87
69.01
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 470 -47
- 124508 --
-- 04/29/87
- 37-.-31
ST -- PAUL - BOOK - - --
- GEN - SUPPLIES
'0- 4504 - 470 -47 --
5311 -1- -
- - - - -- -
179.44 *
124516 04/22/87
124516 - -- 04/22/87
124516 04/22/87
sss *ss
351.00
207;28--
72.00
630.28 s
- - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - * * * -CK S
SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 103355
- -SEARS ROEBUCK -. -- -- — - TOOLS - -- 40- 4580 - 801 -80 281314 --
SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 278053
- - -- -124526- - 04/29/87 - - - -- - 4,860.. -2F- TRACY OIL -
4,860.21 *
tttttt - - - - --
124550
04/22/87
*t * *ts
124553 04/23/87
124553 04/23/87
- - -- 124553 ---- 04/23/87 --
y l�
. .I
79.30 TISDEL STANDARD
-79 : -30 -- * - --- - - -- - --
- - - -- GASOL -INE
REPAIR PARTS
* ** -CKS
12- 560 -56- 45079 - -- - - - - - -- -
- - - -- - - -- s ** -CKS
10- 4540- 560 -56 12583
* ** -CKS
463.07 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54
339.21 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54
31-.-81 UNITED- ELECTRIC -CORP REPA -IR -PARTS 40- 4540- 80a -80 -- - - - - -- --
834.09
- -- -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - - -- - -... -- - - - - -- — - - - - -- - *s* -CKS
E
r
r.
C
-
' 1987 CITY
or soIm*
cxsom msozmrse
ns-u*-or
pAos 11
oxsuw mn.-DATa------------*nowmz---
-vsmDom
Tsm-osocmzezzou______Auooumz-mm_-zwu--wp'o-
w
nsoawws
..
vawsao ---04/2e/87�
--'---'----
20. 00 -'
MAMA------ ------
LumCosnm_-
n=yena=�Ao-v*
'
aw�uo *
'-***-cma
`
- 124s73
04/e3/87
43.20
Vnww
osw wuppLzsa
10-4504-540-5*
160*9
,
-------
---'------------�s-eo-*-'-'-_'___'____--_'_--_--_-_____-_-
____ _
***-cmo
"
. 12457s
0*/23/87
90.00
wArsm pnoowcTo
osm muppLIsw
10-*504-646-6*
0346se
~ 1e457s
04/ee/87
1e0.00
WATER pmooumTe
mepwzm p*mro
40-4s40-803-80
033s57
'
' - - -------
------'-------evo.no-*----__-__
_ --__-_---_---_-______--------------------------
---'---
~ ******
***-cxs
`
1e4579
04/e3/87
111.91
WILLIAMS aTssL-xows
Gsm nuppLzse
10-4504-560-56
7*482
' . 1e4579
04/e3/87
*o.no
WILLIAMS oTssL-xows
TOOLS
10-4580-301-30
7ee16
^
-- '-----------------'-'----�sy-wn-*---'--------'--___-______-__-_
'--___--
�_.
***-CKo
^
/ 1e*582
04/ee/87
331.17
GORDON nnzT* co
mAmwLzws
e7-461e-66*-66
1025
~
331.17 *
.
******
-.
***-cwa
—124584 ---
4/ao
61-.-1w---WAnmER-IwoUSTRz*I
___msm-SUPPLzs
0=_450*=30_1_n-30_____-__.
,
ea1.v* *
******'---------
-'
--- -'- '-----------'------
--------------
-'***-cuo
- 1e4603
0*/e3/87
45.55
uzrTsw moLr awppLr
mspwzm pwnrw
27-45*0-666-66
26118
,
_—_--
=`5
-
_--
'
***-Cwe
°
' 124701
ow/ee/or
*3'67e.26
*smmspzw coumTr
nos on*
vo-vv*s-non-nn
- � 1e4701
04/ee/e7
e8'53e.44
*smwspzm couwTr
mpsC Aoosao
10-*9ee-506-50
°
***-Cwo
"
'. vawTns
0*/e2/87
*ys.nn
CrLzmosn CITY INC
nnmT msp*zRw
10-*e*8-s60-s6
*ws*
~
*ys.ou *
`
ve*rna
04/22/87
167.80
moPxsR OIL conp*mr
wsm mupPLzsS
10-4sp*-s60-s6
303+ss
-
167.80 *
.
1e4707
0*/2e/87
80.83
cnmr n*psrr souIp
msm ouppLIsn
10-*50*-6*6-64
11048e
- 1e4707
04/ee/87
123.01
cowT oApsTr smuzp
msw auppLIsw
10-*504-801-80
109773
,
--1e4707
4ve2/8
73.01--------CowT-w*rETY-suuzp
____wArsz*-smux
o=46 *e=3,0.�~3 0
-1�01+0_--------
-
*76.85 *
^.
--�
°
—12470e ---
4/22/e
0*a3----
oDWAY-IwowUPpLY----GEN--SUPPLIs
**�-32S�30-S2947_
,
*
vnoT L..r OF sozwa
cxsnw mo_ DATE --- --'Anmumr
cxsnu *=aIwTse ts-u+-oT p*os
----vsmoon - -- - '----ITEM DsoomzpT-IOm-------*CCouwT -NO --zmv.-wp.n. w nswaAws
.
1e4708
04,e2/87
*u.vn
nznw*r xwo auppLr
msm muppLIso
10-4504-325-30
s3663
' - --------
-----------,
SO. 43 *--------
- - -'
---' ----- -
------'---
-----
124709
nw/ae/ar
21.s6
TOWN m nmwmTnY owoms
Rsp*zm PARTS
vn-*s*n-san-sa
snyes
- -- --------
------------'21.s6
*------
- -- -'--''-
--- -
___-
-_-
�
vawrvn
0*/2e/87
266.37
m*mpr sswALL
rooLm
vn-*swn-swn-sa
106s67
. -
'
----- -'
266 .37-
'--
- -
------'
_
1e*711
04/22/87
816.10
envsnmmswr TR*xmzmG
osnvICs
10-*e01-100-10
368s
'
-- -- -------'----------------u
1a. 10 *- ---
-- '- '-
- -------
----------_----
^
1e*71e
04/ee/87
Is.nn
JANET cxwmoLsm
esznmwmosnsmT
10-4sn*-507-sn
,
' -
---- ----'
-'----�s.un-*--
--- ' - - - -
--- ----- ---'
--------- _
-- '- -
,
1e4713
o*/ae/or
*ya.00
TsoanAm ossn u cxsn
aoo m mLwcm nznT
10-4562-6*4-64
12e739
-'
1e*713 ----o4/2e/87-------------830.00--------rsoamAm
osso u o*sn----'osso
0-4s6e-6*e-6*-1ee738
'---- -
'
�a*���
o��ee�o7
a^oso.ou
Tsomn*m osso m o*sm
wsso
vu-*saw-awo-aw
1ee730
-
3,372.00 *
1e*714
nw/ee/ar
90.00
aC**psm souIpnsmr co
rooLo
vo-*smn-om-sn
1315e3
90.00 *
1e4715
04/e3/87
100.00
JIM HATCH owLso CO
wsm ouppLzsm
10-4sn*-560-56
7105
1e*71s
o*/ea/oT
11s.9*
zzn *wTc* o*Lso CO
Tomuy
10-*580-301-30
Twoo
.�--'1e*715
oxTu*-owLso om-----'Gsm-wuppLzs
S
40-4504-801--80-7105----
-
.'
3e7.s4 *
'
..----1e4716-
-----w*/eevo
e1_m3-------'mowr
ouwzmswu-mYsT-------pmzw7-Im
~4600-200~e0--'-----------
,
21.03 *
,
1e4717'
----n*/ea/or----------eov.aV
------mTsuAnr-LwnesR
-----
REPAIR-PARTS
0-4540-5e0-5e
762e7--
201.60 *
- 1e4718 '---'04/e2/87------------698.36--------wnssLsm
Lumosm -----CORRECTION
10-4504-335-30
----'---
.
1e4718
nw/ae/or
69.36
wxssLsR Lwmaso
osm wwppLIsn
10-4504-335-30
^
_!
1e*718
n*/ea/eT
698.36
u*ssLsn Lumose
osm ouppLzsw
10-450*-335-30
- - - '------
-'
an,�a-*------'
'- -- ---'
---------'-'---
-- '
-_--_--_
'.
1e*719
04/e2/87
3*1.00
Comvsrmno INC
esm muppLzsw
10-450*-301-30
Cmewue
--
'-----
*1-0 0 -*------'
--' -- - '--------------
-
_-'-__
___--___-
' )
1e47e0
nw/ee/or
*4e.25
wsLSow RADIO COMM
Rsp*zR pAmro
10-45+0-560-56
1*32e
'-
- ------'-
�a.es-*--------
'- ---'
--- ' --------
--- --_
' __
`.'
1247e1
ow/ae/wr
392.52
wsmrozos smuIp Co
nspwzR p*nTo
10-4540-s40-s4
93e1
-' --'-
-------'-
ye.se'*---------'
-- - --
---- ---' -
-_-______
_
'
1e472e
0*/e7/87
160.00
CowT nspAzno
*0-4e48-801-80
e1301
1247ee ----mw/ea/w
4e1.9e'-------mnnrwa7An
wATsnumowS ------
REPAIR-PARTS
o-*s*w-ono-ew
eanov
.
581.92 *
---ve47e3-----n4/ee/o s7n.s3-------'RAzmouu-LsAmzmG -CO-------Comr-msR ~4e00�Sw7-50--------- - -
570.53 *
"7 1e+7e* ---'**/2e/e7 ---'� ------��es,no-------nwowALsws-poesLT AMBULANCE -REFUND- 10-31e0-000-00 -'----
. ~
�e
^
^
'
--
'
^
°
m
^
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87 PAGE 13
CHECK N0.
DATE - - -- --
AMOUNT- . - - - --
-- - ___VENDOR - - - -- - -- _ -_. -- ._ITEM-
DESCRIP -T -ION
ACCOUNT --- NO- .-- _INV- .- .M- P- .O. - -N MESSAGE
325.00 •
124725
04/22/87
180.00
CHEMSEARCH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 646 -64
180.00 •
v
124726
04/22/87
94.00
MRPA
CONF & SCHOOLS
10- 4202- 600 -60
94.00 •
•
124727
04/22/87
26.60
SYSTEM SUPPLY INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
040515
26.60 •
•
124728
04/22/87
520.00
THE BUREAU OF NATL
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
124728
04/22/87
120.00
THE BUREAU OF NATL
DUES
10- 4204 - 140 -14
•
- - ----
- - - --- ---- - - - - --
- - -- 640- .00- + - --
- - -- - -- -- - - _ -- ------------
- - - - --
-- ------- - - - - --
-- _ - --- - --
124729
04/22/87
15.19-
COPY EQUIPMENT INC
CORRECTION
10- 4901 - 260 -26
•
-124729
- 04/22/87 - - - --
- - - - -- --15. 19 - - -
-- COPY - EQUIPMENT INC _-CORRECTION
- .... - -_-
10-4901-260-26-
124729
04/22/87
11519.00
COPY EQUIPMENT INC
EQUIP REPLACEMENT
10- 4901 - 260 -26
155204
124729
04/22/87
1,519.00
COPY EQUIPMENT INC
EQUIP REPLACEMENT
10- 4901 - 260 -26
155204
•
- 124729 - - --
04/22/87-------- -
- - - -1 , 519. 00- - - --
- - COPY EQUIPMENT INC - - - --
CORRECTION - - --
±.0 -4901- 260 -26
- - - - - - -- -. _ _
1,519.00 •
•
-- 124730 - -
04/22/87 - - --
96, 00 - --
MINNESOTA -GOLF ASSO -- - - - -
-- GEN .- SUPP-LIES
27 -4504- 664 -66_
_- - - - -_. -____- _
96.00 •
•
124731 - --
04/22/87 -- - - - -- - -
- -- 52.00---- - - - -
-- CARL -- SHANNON -- _-- - - - -.- .__
.BOOKS - - --
1 -0 -4202- 490- 49----
_. -_ -- _
52.00 •
•
- - -- 124732 - --
04/22/87 --
- 130.86 --
STEBGO- METALS INC- - -__ -- -GEN
- SUPPLIES-
23-4504-6t2-61_42636_____..___.
_
124732
04/27/87
42.08
STEBGO METALS INC
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23 -4568- 611 -61
42972
172.94 •
•
124733
04/22/87
26.10
WASTE MANAGEMENT
RUBBISH REMOVAL
23- 4250 - 612 -61
26.10 +
•
124734
04/23/87
469.50
CONTACT MOBILE COMM
REPAIR PARATS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
6025
124734
04/23/87
145.50
CONTACT MOBILE COMM
REPAIR PARTS
40 -4540- 801 -80
6025
•
- - - - -- ---
- -- - --
615. 00 - - ; - --
- --
124735
04/23/87
75.00
LOLA EDMAN
SERVICES
27- 4201- 662 -66
9167
•
- -- ---- - - - - -- -
- - --
75..-00-+---.----------
- - - - --
124736
04/23/87
14.56
LYNDALE HARDWARE
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
•
- 124737
04/23/87
15.00
J HERBERT DECKER
SHOVEL
10 -4248- 644 -64
•
124738
04/23/87
105.00
TWIN CITIES READER
ADVERTISING
50- 4214- 822 -82
•
124738
- 04/23/87 -- - - - - --
- - -- 3:33 - -- --
-TWIN- CITIES READER--- - - - - --
ADVERTISING -
- -50- 4214 - 822 -82
- - - - --
124738
04/23/87
105.00
TWIN CITIES READER
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 842 -84
124738
04/23/87
3.33
TWIN CITIES READER
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 842 -84
- -. - 124738 -
04/23/87-
105. -00
TWIN - CITIES READER
ADVERT -ISING
50- 4214 - 862 -86
124738
04/23/87
3.34
TWIN CITIES READER
ADVERTISING
50 -4214- 862 -86
'
325.00 •
1987 C1iY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
OS -04 -87 PAGE 14
CHECK -NO- DATE -- -- - - -
- -- AMOUNT----------
- - - - -- VENDOR - -- --
- - -I TEM -DESCR IPTION-
ACCOUNT- NO -I NV--11 -P : O. N MESSAGE
rrrrrr
-
- - - -...
-- __.
-- - - - - --
- - -- - - - -- -- rrr -CKS
124742
04/27/87
12,309.00
TILLSON BUS 6 EQUIP
AR /MIS
10 -1139- 000 -00 11372
-
-- -
-- - --12,309; 00-
+- -
--
124743
04/27/87
51.25
KARI MEIER
MAINTANANCE
23- 4120 - 612 -61
-
- - -- --
- - 51 .25-
1247.44
04/27/87
100.00
HEATHER HENKEL
MAINTANANCE
23- 4120- 612 -61
-- - --
- - -- - - --
- - - -1 00 . 00
+ - -
-- -
124745
04/27/87
7.00
MINNESOTA CRAFT
ADVERTISING
23- 4214 - 611 -61
- - - -
-- - - - - --
-- -- - -7: 00
+ - --
124746
04/27/87
25.00
DIANA HEDGES
PINS
23- 4504 - 611 -61
124746 - -
- 04/27/87
- 21 :96-
- -DIANA HEDGES - - - - --
- SUPPLIES - - - --
-23- 4504 - 612 -61 - --
124746
04/27/87
15.98
DIANA HEDGES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
23- 4516- 611 -61
,
62.94
+
124747
04/27/87
637.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
INSTRUCTOR
23 -4201- 611 -61
,
637.00
+
124748
- 04/27/87
123.00
RAY GORMLEY
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
,
123.00
•
124749
04/27/87
480.00
SUSAN FRAME
INSTRUCTOR
23 -4201- 611 -61
,
480.00
+
124750
04/27/87
224.00
DOROTHY OOLAND
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
224.00
+
124751
04/27/87
288.00
MONICA RUDQUIST
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
288.00
+
124752
04/27/87
204.00
BESTY BRYANT
INSTRUCTOR
23 -4201- 611 -61
,
204.00
+
124753
04/27/87
144.00
CY TURNBLADH
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201- 611 -61
144.00
+
124754
04/27/87
24.00
HELEN ZABEL
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201- 611 -61
24.00
+
124755
04/27/87
30.00
DAVID DOUGHMAN
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
30.00
+
124756
04/27/87
132.00
BILL COLE
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201-611 -61
132.00
+
124757
04/27/87
120.00
DOROTHY HALL
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201 - 611 -61 -
{
120.00
+
124758
04/27/87
60.00
BERNADETTE DALY
INSTRUCTOR
23- 4201- 611 -61
�.,
60.00
+
- - - - -- 124768 - - -
04/27/87-
31-.-37
RUBENSTEIN S- ZIFF----
._CRAFT SUPPLIES - --
23- 4588 - 6 1 1 -6 1-
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
04/27/87
CHECK
REGISTER
05 -04 -87 PAGE 15
CHECK -NO.
-DATE --- ----- - - - -
-- AMOUNT-----------
__ - - -,- VENDOR------------------------
.I -TEM -- DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT- NO. -INV.- N- P. -O.- N MESSAGE
124759
- .._04/27/87 - -- -
____ - ____._96.00 -- _-------
EVIE-- HOLMQUIST
- INSTRUCTOR - --
-23 -- 4201-611 -61- --
PIP FABRICATORS INC
SIGNS d POSTS
96.00
124760 --
- - 04/27/87--- ----
—._ 1 12.00-
-- MARGARET - GUST-------
--INSTRUCTOR-
-23- 420.1-- 6- 1- 1-- 61- _----- - -_ -_-
04/27/87
400.00
112.00
AR MIS
10 -1139- 000 -00
124761- -
- -- 04/27/87 -------
- - - - -- 355.00-------
- - -. -- MARGARET -.MC DOWELL----
- - - - -- INSTRUCTOR-
23- 4201 - 611- 61------- - - - - -- - -.-
124771
355.00
822.90
LAND CARE EQUIPMENT
CONT REPAIRS
124762
- -- 04/27/87 - - --
- -- 269 .00---- - - -
- -- BILL-- DIETRICHSON
INSTRUCTOR -
23=4201-- 611- 61 .
269.00
- 124763 - - -
-- 04/27/87--- .-- -
- - - -- -384- .00---- - -
- - -- JEAN-- GRAPP-----------
.----- - - - - -- INSTRUCTOR - - - - --
23=4201 -61- 1--61 - -- - -- -
384.00
- -- 124773 -
- -- 124764 - - - -
-- 04/27/87-- - - -
- -- -- 132- 00-- - -
- - -- HARR -Y -- HEIM - - - - --
- - -- INSTRUCTOR
23- 420.6- 1 -1 - -b1 - -- -- - - .
132.00 *
y - - -- - 124765-- - -
- - -- 04/27/87 --
- - -- 660 -. 00 - - --
MARIAN-- ALSTAD-------
- -.. -- INSTRUCTOR - --
23- 420 -1 -61 t-- 61 - - -- - - - - -. - - -- - -
23- 4248- 612 -61
03862 _ - -- -
660.00 •
04/27/87
61.20
MPLS WELDERS SUPP CO
---- 1247b6 -- - --
04/27/87-
-- 690 -.00 - - -
--- KAY -S - -- SCHLOSSER --
.---- INSTRIICTR - - -.
23- 4241--_6- 1 -1=6 -1
+
690.00
124775
04/27/87
_ 124767 - -- - - -
- -- 04/27/87 -
- -- 60, - ..- .
00.-- .__.._-
J. THOMAS- NELSON
- -- ..
___- INSTRUCTR-----------_23-
4201- 61 - -1 -61 ----- - - - - --
8,280.00
60.00
- - - - -- 124768 - - -
04/27/87-
31-.-37
RUBENSTEIN S- ZIFF----
._CRAFT SUPPLIES - --
23- 4588 - 6 1 1 -6 1-
0 658 6 5-- .- - - - - --
124768
04/27/87
10.78
RUBENSTEIN E ZIFF
COST OF COMMODITIES
23- 4624 - 613 -61
- -__-
066152
42.15
124769
04/27/87
912.69
PIP FABRICATORS INC
SIGNS d POSTS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
912.69
124770
04/27/87
400.00
MINNESOTA VALLEY
AR MIS
10 -1139- 000 -00
400.00
124771
04/27/87
822.90
LAND CARE EQUIPMENT
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
9034
822.90
- -- 124773 -
04/27/8-- 7------
- - - - -- ._15.00--
---- -- STATE - TREASURER - -- -
- -- CERTIFICATION
-40- 431 -0- 809- 80---------
- - - - -- --
15.00
- 124774 -- --
04/27/87- - --
- -- 217 -. 88 -
- - -- MPLS- WELDERS SUPP -CO --
CONT - -REPAIRS -
23- 4248- 612 -61
03862 _ - -- -
124774
04/27/87
61.20
MPLS WELDERS SUPP CO
CRAFT SUPPLIES
23- 4588 - 611 -61
--
04164
279.08
+
124775
04/27/87
8,280.00
ASSO WOOD PRODUCTS
MENS CLUB
27 -2237- 000 -00
8,280.00
•
124776
04/27/87
48.15
AMERICABLE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
79089
48.15
V
•
•
•
•
1987 CIrY OF EDINA CHECK k�wISTER 05 -04 -87 eAGE 16
CHECK NO.- DATE - - - - - - -- AMOUNT---------- - - - - -- VENDOR - - - -- - -- ITEM DESCRIPTION- ACCOUNT- NO —INV -N -P:O. M MESSAGE
124777 -
- 04/27/87 -
- - 95.00
- -ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC
ADVISOR --
10 -4204- 440 -44
- - -- -
95.00
124778
- - -- 04/27/87 ----- - -
- - -- 270.00 -- - -
- - -- LANDSCAPE 6 TURF - - - - --
- GEN- SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
2557 - -- -
270.00
124779
-- 04/29/87-- - -- - --
-- 160. 65 - - -
-- DESLAURIERS -INC - - -- -
-LUMBER-- -
1 0- 4604 - 260 -26
15191 -
160.65 *
-- 124780- - - - -
-- 04/29/87 -- --- -
- - - -- -89.00 ---
- - - - -- JOYCE REPYA- - -- - --
COMPUTER-CLASS-
0- 4201 -- 280- 28 -
- - - -- -
89.00 s
-- 124781 - --
- - -- 04/29/87 -- - - --
- -- 25.00
-- -- D-C HEY - COMPANY -- --- -
- GEN--SUPPLIES --
-10 -4504- 133 -12 --
032571 -
25.00
- 124782----04/29/87
-
135.83 --
MOLLIE- PAULSON —
- -- ART -WORK -SOLD
23 3625- 000 -00-
- - - -- -
135.83 *
r
- 124783 -
---- 04/29/87--- - -
- - -- 88.00- -
-- -SUSAN HIBBS - - - - --
- POSTAGE—
-23- 4290 - 611-- 61
—- - -- -
r
88.00 *
- -- 124784 --
-- 04/29/87-
-- 1,017:50-
MINNESOTA -UC FUND
- -- INSURANCE-
' -0- 4160- 51 -0 -51
-----
1,017.50
- 124785
-- 04/29/87 -- --
- - - - -1 07.1 0- - --
-- MN SUB NEWSPAPER----------
- ADVERTISING - --
10-4212-510-51
-- - -- -
124785
04/29/87
32.17
MN SUB NEWSPAPER
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 822 -82
124785
04/29/87
32.17
MN SUB NEWSPAPER
ADVERTISING
50- 4214 - 842 -84
- 124785—
04/29/87
-- 32 -16-
-MN- SUB - NEWSPAPER -
-- ADVERT -ISING
50- 424-4- 862 -86-
-
203.60
124786 --
-- 04/29/87
-6.95 -----
--GAIL SIMONS- - - - -- - --
- REFUND - - - --
10- 3350 - 000- 00-
- - - - --
124786
04/29/87
.42
GAIL SIMONS
REFUND TAX
10- 3357 - 000 -00
7.37
124787
04/29/87
240.00
CLEAN FLO LAB INC
INDIANHEAD LAKE
10- 2242 - 000 -00
3647
' 124787
04/29/87
37.00
CLEAN FLO LAB INC
INDIANYHEAD LAKE
10- 2242 - 000 -00
3573
- -
-- - - - --
-- -277 00 * -
- - --
124788
04/29/87
660.00
MN DOWNHOLE SERVICSE
CONT REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
255
- -- - - --
--
660-.0 0 - * - -
- - -- - -- - - -- - --
-- -
124789
04/29/87
6.96
BYERLYS CATERING
MEETING EXPENSES
10- 4206 - 100 -10
3080
' 124790
04/29/87
12,199.00
JOE GREUPNER
APRIL LESSONS
27- 4100 - 661 -66
_- - - -- - - - - - --
-- -- - - - --
12-,- 199:00- *----- -
- - - -- - - -- - --
' 124791
04/29/87
380.00
BOWLER COMPANY
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1330 - 000 -00
71414
- .. - ----- ..
- - - -- - - - - --
380:00 *-- -
- - -.. _.._ - - -- - - -- - ----- ---
' 124792
04/29/87
98.89
MARJORIE MULLIGAN
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
' 124793
04/29/87
111.00
FRIDEN ALCATEL
SERICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
+ 1987 "CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87 PAGE 17
- CHECK - NO -.-
DATE -- - - --
AMOUNT------------
- - - -.. - -- VENDOR - - --
-ITEM- DESCRIP -T -ION
- ACCOUNT- NO.- INV.- B- P -.O.- N MESSAGE
111.00
124794
04/29/87
173.44
XEROX CORP
SERVICE CONTRACTS
10- 4288 - 510 -51
173.44
s
124795
04/29/87
20.00
BOB KOJETIN
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4204 - 600 -60
20.00
s
124796
04/29/87
243.98
DIANA HEDGES
REIMBURSEMENT
10- 4504 - 627 -62
243.98
s
124797
04/29/87
66.75
ROOT 0 MATIC
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 440 -44
66.75
s
124798
04/29/87
173.22
FISCO
GEN SUPPLY
10- 4504 - 440 -44
173.22
•
124799
04/29/87
164.30
LEROY LISK
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512 - 440 -44
164.30
124800
04/29/87
341.41
FAIRVIEW COMM HOSP
1ST AID SUPPLIES
10- 4510 - 440 -44 286515
341.41
124801
04/29/87
3,000.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE
10- 4290- 510 -51
3,000.00
124802
04/29/87
114.00
GRANDMAS CUPBOARD
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
114.00
s
.
124803
04/29/87
10.00
GORDON STUART
REFUND
10- 4202 - 123 -12
10.00
+
124804
04/29/87
125.00
GOVERNMENT TRAINING
REGISTRATION
10- 4206 - 140 -14
125.00
•
124805
04/29/87
230.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
COFFEE
10- 4504- 506 -50
230.00
s
.
124806
04/29/87
49.50
AUTO SPRINKLER
PERMIT
10- 3112-000 -00
49.50
•
124807
04/29/87
84.38
_ CASHIER
FLOWERS
10 -4500- 500 -50
84.38
w
124808
04/29/87
405.00
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 500 -50
124808
04/29/87
36.75
ERIC ANDERSON
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 500 -50
- - -- -
- - - - --
441- .75 -w-
-
- --
124809
04/29/87
180.00
ANOKA
SCHOOL
10- 4202 - 440 -44 •
- - -- -- - - -
180,.00 __s_..
124810
04/29/87
44.50
THE PRINT SHOP
PROGRAMS
10- 4500-500 -50
124811
04/29/87
21.00
ROXANNE BORRELL
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 510 -51
vyar ` . or soImA C*scm .-.IoTsn ns-n*-o^ /Aos vo
| - -cxsnK mo.-oATs --------*noomT-- vsmoon-------'------zTsm-osoCnzpTzOm-------AoCOwmr-mO--Imv,-* p_o. w nsoaAos
� '
a1.nn *
`
12*81e
04/29/87
118.80
np* xmounTRzsw
souzp m*zmr
10-4e7*-4e0-*2
^
118.80 *
�
124813
04/e9/87
18.50
AUTO 000mn
souIp n*zmT
10-4e7*-420-4e
asee
'
1e*813
o*/ay/oT
18.50
Au7n wouwo
smuIp mAzmr
10-4e74-4e0-42
asaa
.-'
--'
----------
37 .0 0 -*-----
- ' �------- -- ---'-'----�---
-_-_--'-__---_
1e4814
nw/ep/oT
e39.18
nnmozmooALs p*nn
msw ouppLr
10-4504-*70-47
___-_ '
�y.vo-*----------------
-----'--'---------
_----_-_-
124815
04/e9m87
e04.*0
MpLw *sAL7* ospT
asmvzcsa
10-4e01-4e0-*e
5e98
-----
---'----'---'-
--e04.*0-*--
,.
~ 1
124816
04/29/87
490.00
nsrno AREA snsnmsmCr
wsmmsL osnv
10-4e78-*70-47
.'
-------�-
p�nw��'
-------'-�-�—
_��
�
~'..
1e4817
u*/an/wr
ees.no
vsomCo
mspwzR pwnro
40-4540-805-80
3e83
��----'--
'------- --
ees�ww-*---'------'--
- -----------
----'---
-
----�__---'__-___--_-
^.
1e4818
ow/ey/wr
195.00
*npm Tnss osnozCs
TREE nsnovAL
10-1300-870-18
+-------''-----��
195-00__*
---'------
_____ - -�
----'
�.
~|
12+819
04/29/e7
70s.16
s mAvzo ocoOsm
CnmvsmrIom
sw-+eue-w*n-o*
_-
_- _---_-_--_----
5`-16-*--------'�---------�---------'----
- '
__-�----_----_'__-
�
1e48e0
04/29/87
1^131.34
pno rsC* Annnnso p
AnmumIrzom
10-457e-420-*2
860e44
' _-__-________-_
-3
124821
04/e9/87
sn.nn
nsrmn p*Ows
osmvzcsy
10-4901-4e0-4e
---
------'
sn,�w-*-------------'----'
-
-
_--____--_-_-__-__---
- `
1e48ee
0*/29/87
3s.10
sozww POLICE
mwo
10-4e06-430-42
.----'
' --------'-'
'-
�s.��-*------'-----------
'---_-----_-__-'
�
1e48e3
04/e9/87
270.00
pT*C
TUITION
vn-*ene-wan-ws
,.
_ --_
'_---__-- �
�o.no-*--------------
- --------------------
-_-__'_--'_____'__'_
_
1e48e*
u+/en/oT
eeo.nw
cwLzBns pnsan
TuTTznm
10 -�enm-*en-wa
---------'
eo,*�—�'-------
—�---
__�- _
- '
1e*8es
0*/e9/87
as.nn
w*w*zmwrow Cmzns
wwowCnzprznm
10-4e04-4e0-*e
.
__� --
__-_�__-_ -'
s.ow-*------�-
--'----- '--------------'-
-__-_- -__-
_--_-___
124826
04/e9/87
6.87
BRADY oppzcswAns
osm owppLzso
10-450*-420-4e
aasw
-ve*oaa
---0*/e9/87
1-1.09 -------omAuv--mrFzCsu*ns---------Gsm--SuppLxsS
10-4sw4-43*-*2
26sII--- -'
17.96 *
1e*8e7-
----04/29/87
O,00-
-N L*mo-ouwzmswS'oonn----souzp-nAz
7*-*e0-4e
r3193'--
�.
'-'
30.00 *
-- ~~~~~`------------ --�***-cwo
+wa-3
~ �p
�
�
�
. 1987 ►CITY OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
05 -04 -87 PAGE 19
CHECK NO DATE— - -- AMOUNT---------- .._____
_- __VENDOR
-- - ____.--
I -TEM- .DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT- NO- -INV.- B_P- -.O. -M MESSAGE
24.05 s
s * * * **
* * *-CKS
188,099.20
FUND
10
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
- - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - -- 6- ,696.95-- - - -_
-- -. -- FUND
23
TOTAL -- -_ - - --
ART CENTER --
_ —_ -- _- -
74.00
FUND
25
TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
263.80
FUND
26
TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
FUND
27
TOTAL -
GOLF COURSE FUND_
786.30
FUND
28
TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
195.67
FUND
29
TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- 230,478.23 -. -- -
-. __ FUND
40
TOTAL - -._. _ __ -
UTILITY_FUND
2,644.37
FUND
50
TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
1,803.09
FUND
60
TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
458,373.85
TOTAL
- - - - - .. .. - — - - - - -- -- --- - - - - --
--
--
-- -- -- --
- - -- - --
-COMPUTER - CHECKS' 5 - #-- 7-7632 - THRU - —.
77842