Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-05-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 4, 1987 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF APRIL 20, 1987 ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of April 20, 1987 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. * A. Lot Division - 6820 Cheyenne Circle - B. McGlynn * B. Set Hearing Date (5/18/87) 1. Namron Corporation - Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval - R -1 to PRD -4 Planned Residence District - Generally located north of Vernon Av and west of Villa Way 2. Fairview Southdale Hospital - Construction of a new medical office building - 6401 France Avenue 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - U.T.F.C. Addition - Generally located east of Washington Av and north of I -494 4. Regis Corporation - Construction of a new office building - 5000 Normandale Rd 5. Flood Plain Ordinance Amendment IV. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Readin 1. Ordinance No. 825 -A18 - An Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to Allow Curbside Pick -up of Leaves /Grass Clippings 2. Ordinance No. 711 -A4 - An Amendment to Ordinance No. 711 to Allow Curbside Pick -up of Leaves /Grass Clippings in the Morningside Area 3. Ordinance No. 434 -AlO - An Amendment to Ordinance No. 434 Changing the Electrical Requirements for Swimming Pools V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. AWARD OF BIDS A. Renewal of Liability Insurance for Police and Public Officials * B. Annual Concrete Supply * C. Truck Replacement - Park Dept * D. Minnehaha Creek Millpond Weed Harvesting M Agenda Edina City Council Page Two VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. I -494 Corridor Study Report by Consultant B. Revocation of Food Establishment License - Swensens C. Centennial Commission Challenge D. Appointment to Heritage Preservation Board E. Council Liaison F. Goose Control Project -VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Council Brochure X. FINANCE A: Public Hearing - Proposed Issuance by City of Edina of General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 5/4/87: General Fund $188,099.20, Art Center $6,696.95, Capital Fund $74.00, Swimming Pool Fund $263.00, Golf Course Fund $27,332.24, Recreation Center Fund $786.30, Gun Range Fund $195.67, Utility Fund $230,478.23, Liquor Dispensary Fund $2,644.37, Construction Fund $1,803.09, Total $458,373.85 Mon May 11 Mon May 11 Tues May 12 Mon May 18 Mon June 1 June 9 - 12 Mon June 15 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Board of Review Joint Council /School Board Meeting Special Meeting - Hedberg Property Regular Council Meeting Regular Council Meeting LMC Annual Conference Regular Council Meeting 5:00 p.m. Council Room 8:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse 5:00 p.m. Braemar Clubhouse 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mayor Civic Center - Rochester 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APRIL 20, 1987 Answering rollcall were .Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the H.R.A. meeting of April 6,1987 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH PHASE VI COURTYARD DRAINS AND UTILITIES. Manager Rosland presented the bid of Wenzel Mechanical at $13,398.00 for courtyard drains for Edinborough Phase VI Condominiums as sole bidder and installer of the courtyard drains for the other phases. Motion of Commissioner Turner was seconded by Commissioner Smith for award of bid to Wenzel Mechanical at $13,398.00. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion carried. Executive Director i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 20, 1987 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' SWIMMING TEAM AND EDINA MIDGET A HOCKEY TEAM COMMENDED Mayor Courtney presented resolutions commending the Edina High School Boys'. Swimming Team,and the Edina Midget A Hockey Team for their.accomplishments in winning recent State championships. The resolutions were unanimously adopted. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes:, Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 6. 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded.by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of April 6, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT NO P -BA -278 CONTINUED TO 5/18. Manager Rosland advised that staff and representatives of Superamerica are continuing to negotiate types of alternatives for the proposed Link Road improvement that would - be satisfactory to allow the continued operation of Superamerica . Staff would recommend continuation of the public hearing to May 18. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly.to continue the public hearing on Street Improvement No. P -BA -278 (Link Road) to the Council Meeting of May 18, 1987. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,-Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR LOT 5. MUIR WOODS (ROBERT GRIFFITH). 'Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for preliminary plat approval for Lot 5, Muir Woods, generally located north of Braemar Boulevard and east and west of Valley View Road, noting that the public hearing was continued from March 16, 1987. The subject parcel is approximately two acres in size and is developed with a single family dwelling in the central portion of the property. The subdivision request proposed to create one new buildable lot. The new lot would measure 41,630 square feet in area and the lot for the existing dwelling would contain 40,073 square feet. Mr.' Larsen pointed out that the topography of the new lot is quite severe. Grades of 40 percent or more occur adjacent to the street on both the east and .west side. In order to provide a manageable grade for a driveway.to the new lot, an easement over the easterly portion of the lot for the existing dwelling is proposed. This easement area will allow the construction of a driveway with a grade of approximately 15 percent. The request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of January 28, 1987 and the Commission recommended approval for these reasons: a) the lots are very large and there will be adequate spacing between the existing homes to the north and south, b) the property. driveways are steep but not unlike other driveways in the area, c) ,locating the new drive on the east side is preferred since the property across the street is park property. The Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat conditioned on: l) final plat approval, 2) subdivision dedication, and 3) payment of utility connection charges. Mr. Larsen advised that following the hearing by the - Commission it was discovered that there were some existing deed restrictions on the property whereby other property owners in the Muir Woods plat had to sign off before any further subdivision could be made. The public hearing by the Council on the preliminary plat was continued to allow the proponent to negotiate the deed restrictions. He reported that the parties involved have reached an agreement with regard to negotiating an amendment to the deed restrictions between now and final plat approval. Mr. Larsen said that the proponent, Robert Griffith, was present to answer questions. No comment or. objections being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR LOT 5, MUIR WOODS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "LOT 5, MUIR WOODS ", platted by Robert T. Griffith and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall:. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. REQUEST FOR FINAL REZONING TO PRD -4 AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL FOR NAMRON CORPORATION REFERRED BACK TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen advised that the subject property is generally located north of Vernon Avenue and West of Villa;Way, He recalled that preliminary rezoning to PRD -4 and preliminary plat approval for the property had been granted by the Council at its meeting of September 8, 1986. The preliminary plat approved illustrated a three story, 135 unit apartment building with 169 underground parking spaces and 68 surface parking spaces. The proponent has now returned with overall development plans to support a request for final zoning and final plat approval. Mr. Larsen advised that the proposal continues to illustrate a three story, 135 unit building with the same parking spaces. The exterior of the building remains unchanged and will be brick with lap siding accents and will have a hip roof. The building has been sited approximately 10 feet to the West but continues to meet or exceed all setbacks required by the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Larsen reminded the Council that at preliminary rezoning and plat approval, the Council imposed several conditions to be addressed before final plat approval. First, construction of a sidewalk along Vernon Avenue adjacent to the property. The sidewalk is shown on the final development plan and is also included in the developer's agreement. Secondly, a storm water management plan.to be approved by the City Engineer. A plan has been submitted that was reviewed and approved by the Engineer and has also been reviewed by the staff of,the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District'. The result should reduce storm_ water following substantial rainfall in the.area. adjacent to Glen Brae Circle:. Thirdly, a variance was requested to reduce the surface parking requirement of 101 spaces to 68 spaces thereby reducing the hard surface area. A proof of .parking agreement has been signed by the developer which provides that the City may at its discretion require that 33 surface parking spaces be added to bring the parking up to Ordinance requirements if the need arises. Fourth, signalization cost sharing by the City and the developer should a traffic signal be warranted in the immediate vicinity in the future. An assessment agreement has.. been signed by the developer, based on the amount of traffic generated by the project not to exceed 10 percent. With regard to landscaping, Mr. Larsen said the, plan proposes to save significant amounts of existing vegetation along the perimeter of the site and the landscaping plan conforms to Ordinance requirements. Staff has requested that additional trees be added to the plan to provide additional year around color and screening on the Vernon Avenue and the westerly sides of the site. An important side issue for the proposed development has been traffic on Vernon Avenue. At the time of preliminary approval, the Council asked the issue be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee to get their recommendations. Traffic safety concerns were considered by the Committee at its meeting of April'14, 1987 and the Committee adopted the recommendations made by the traffic consultant,. Benshoof and Associates, Inc., who was involved earlier in the development plan. Mr. Larsen stated that the Community.Development and Planning Commission heard the subject proposal at its meeting of April 1, 1987 and recommended final rezoning and plat approval for the following reasons: 1) Design development features.of the proposal, including number of dwelling units, building design and materials, parking and building location are consistent with preliminary approval, 2) With the exception of surface parking, the plans meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements; construction .of the additional 33 spaces required by Ordinance is assured by a proof of parking agreement, 3) A Proof of Parking Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney.has been signed by the developer, 4) The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 5) An Acceptable storm water drainage plan has been submitted, 6) Sidewalk along Vernon. Avenue will be installed at the developer's expense, and 7) The developer has agreed to participate in the cost of signalization if warranted in the future.. The Commission recommended approval subject to the following conditions: 1) Subdivision dedication based on a land value of.$330,000, 2) Executed Developer's Agreement which has been executed, 3) Executed and recorded Proof of Parking Agreement; the Agreement has been executed but not recorded, and 4) Executed Assessment Agreement for cost of possible signalization. Mr. Larsen advised that the proponent, Norman Bjornnes, was present to answer questions. Member Turner asked if there had been any change as to setbacks and height relative to surrounding properties. Mr. Larsen responded that the building has been moved approximately 10 feet to the west and that the setback on that side is 40 feet to the property line. As to building height, Mr. Larsen said it is almost identical to the initial plan. The first floor of the building will be at an elevation of 923 feet which compares to an elevation of 945 feet for the driveway of Edina Highland Villa apartments on Villa Way to the north and an elevation of about 950 feet for the homes on Duncraig Road to the west. Dave Getsch, 5233 Richwood Drive, asked why when land is zoned for single family dwellings is it considered for rezoning to multiple dwellings. He said it would jeopardize property values of single family homes in the area and asked how dense this area was going to get. He added that the comment was made that this project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan but that he felt the residents should be asked how they felt about the use of this land. Member Richards explained that according to the Comprehensive Plan this parcel has been suggested as multi - family development since 1966. He said that at one time a request had been made for approval of a seven - story, 175 unit apartment complex for the property which did not receive final approval by the Council. He explained further that before the Comprehensive Plan was adopted public hearings were held to solicit everyone's input as to how vacant land should be designated for use and that subsequently the Plan has been updated following public hearings. When the Plan was considered the Council .looked at the City as a whole or at various quadrants as to how they would develop. Even though it appears that the last vacant parcels are being developed with multiple units, the,.entire timeframe of the Comprehensive Plan should be kept in mind and the heavy concentration of single family detached residences that were built during the years of Edina's growth and development. Member Turner commented that in developing the Comprehensive Plan in 1980 we looked at small strip commercial areas like this and said it is important to the City to protect the single family homes near these commercial areas by limiting the expansion of these commercial areas. So we said in the Comprehensive Plan that when there is an opportunity for redevelopment in any of these types of commercial areas that we ought to look at the redevelopment to.be housing rather.than additional commercial which was felt would have a greater impact on single family homes than multi - family housing. Member Richards added that back in 1980 when the Comprehensive Plan process was unfolding comments where made that there was too much density. The Council at that time went through a density reduction as part of the amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to bring the densities down from the 1966 plan. Mr. Getsch asked why the Comprehensive Plan shows the subject property -zoned as R -1 District if.that is not the intent for development. Member Richards explained that all undeveloped.land is held in the R -1 District and is not rezoned until the property.is ready to be developed-so that it forces the developer'to come back to the Council and-hold yet a second series of- public hearings to give all the citizens a chance to give input once again. Dr. Robert Fielden, 5209, Duncraig Road, commented that this will affect everyone living the area in a `detrimental way and will '`change the atmosphere of the area He said that the area has developed as single.family homes and that is how it should stay. Bill Mahoney,.5309,Ayrshire Boulevard, representing the Edina Highland Residents Association, presented.a statement recommending that the Namron Corporation development be denied.at this time and that an advisory referendum be held to get input from the community regarding the issue of higher density. He added that the Council should get a current reading from the people living in the area as to how they feel about the density.,-Member Smith commented that he looked on the Comprehensive Plan as a tool and not as a precise guideline that -has to be followed. He said he shared their concerns and - concurred that the reasons people want to move to Edina are because of the 'excellent school system and the fact that it is.a single family community. He said he had walked the subject property and had talked with residents living in the neighborhood and that he-was also aware.of the traffic concerns of the neighborhood. He pointed out that the Namron project Js not the only.contributing factor-to the traffic.but that-the whole Grandview area is involved according to the traffic study that was made. Conner Schmid; said that he was representing Wilma Smith, 5304 Glenbrae Circle and Mr./Mrs. L. J. Jonason,'5300 Glenbrae Circle, who are closest to the proposed development. Mr. Schmid said they feel they will be severely impacted by the loss.of natural screening and natural topography,. that the density of the project would be an abrupt change in the.character of the neighborhood and that there will be increased traffic problems for the Highland residents exiting to Vernon from Ayrshire. Jack Forrest, 5228 Duncraig Road, stated he was opposed.to the _project. Robert Vaa, 5224 Duncraig Road, said that he was opposed to the high density development because of the traffic safety issue and said it would put additional_ demand on police and fire services. It was also noted that letters of objection had been received from C. S. McKissick, 5216 Duncraig Road and R. H. Rosch, 5248. Richwood Drive. Norman Bjornnes, the developer, explained that the planning process for the development began a long time ago and that they wanted to be as sensitive to the site and the neighborhood as was possible.. He explained that.the top of the building will not exceed the height of the existing trees. They have attempted to save every tree on the site that they possibly can and have trimmed all the trees outside of the construction zone. Privacy along the west side of the site °was a major concern for both the neighbors and the people who will be diving in the project. He added that they have agreed to add additional mature trees if needed. The site is unique with severe topography and not easy to develop. Mr. Bjornnes said they tried to create a minimal impact on traffic by ,adjusting the entrance and by adding a turn -off lane. With regard to the existinv neignoornooa storm water run -o== pro D. station to redirect some of the draini run -off problem will be less than it : percent of the cost of the traffic sib called to get on the list for the pro; continue to live in the City and do ni their homes. He said the apartment ui development will be one that they and tax revenues in excess of $160,000 pei proposed development is a significant project and is significantly below wh: said they have not asked for any subs: they are building this project to be c an asset to the neighborhood and the the Council has asked as well as the the design for minimum impact. Member westerly and what the landscaping agre the project, explained that when the conceptual basis and it was moved due have been moved further to the east bt The building will be 400 feet from the em, he said they will put in a pumping ge in the area so that the storm water s now. He said they have agreed to pay 10 nal. The vast majority of people who have ect have been Edina residents who.want to t want to buy a condominium after they sell its will be first class units and the the City can be proud of. It will produce year. As to density, he noted that the density down sizing from the Vernon Terrace t the Zoning Ordinance allows.. Mr. Bjornnes dies or tax increment from the City and that wned for a long time. They feel it will be ity and that they have done everything that taff and Planning Commission to fine tune Richards asked why the building was moved ement requires. Nick Palaia, architect for lan was first proposed it was done on a to the nature of the dimensioning. It could t that would have disturbed more vegetation. west side to the nearest single family house. As to the landscaping, Mr. Bjornnes said the Planning Department was primarily concerned about the screening for the parking areas. They have a formula for landscaping and based on that they said in the alternative plan they wanted an additional number of trees shown indicating the size and species and that this requirement is covered by the landscaping bond. Member Smith asked the proponent what lead to the proposed density ratio of 19:1. Mr. Bjornnes responded that a number of factors were involved, i.e. what the Zoning Ordinance allows, the topography of the site, the existing vegetation, and what is economically feasible. Member Smith referred to recommendations of the Community Development and Planning Commission made at their meeting of July 30, 1986, with regard to: 1) improving sight -lines at Ayrshire and Vernon, 2) taking traffic counts at Ayrshire/Vernon, 3) reduction of the speed limit along Vernon Avenue and asked if these have been acted upon. Mr. Hoffman said the City has taken steps to improve the sight lines at Ayrshire /Vernon and that the City has requested Hennepin County and MNDOT to perform a.speed limit analysis on Vernon Avenue and that the process has again been started to request reduction of the speed limit. Mr. Hoffman recalled that about three.years.ago the City asked for a speed reduction on Vernon Avenue and that on the west end the speed limit was reduced from 40 to 30 mph but that it was refused for the mid - section on Vernon. Avenue. In reference to signalization,.Mr. Hoffman said that historically Vernon Avenue has had a lot of review and that he would perceive that outside of the Jerry's Shopping Center area that Hansen Road and Gleason Road would be.the next two likely locations that would meet the warrants for signalization. Member Smith asked if the Planning Commission had talked about a density ratio of 12:1 for the project. Mr. Larsen said the- initial request was for 150 units.. Through the staff and the Planning Commission the proponent was told to go back and make a reduction more in line . with the apartment complex on-Villa Way. When the proponent came back with a project more in line with the density of. the apartment complex on Villa Way the Planning Commission felt they had performed and recommended approval of the project. Member Kelly said she intended to vote no on the project for these reasons: 1) that she was not satisfied with the traffic study that was done because it did not consider other proposed projects along Vernon Avenue and that the 10 percent traffic impact from the proposed project was too much, 2) that she was concerned-about the impact on the neighborhood of this project together with the impact of other projects along Vernon Avenue, 3) that she did not see a need for additional apartment development in the City, 4) that she objected.to the . possibility of additional parking for.the project be added in the future, 5) that it will be more difficult for children crossing Vernon Avenue to get.to'Garden Park in light of the fact that Division Park was closed several years ago, 6) that Highlands School will be re- opened.for Edina students, many of whom will be walkers, and that will add to the traffic congestion, and 7) that from a personal commitment to maintain our Mission Statement objective which was to encourage and protect single family housing she did not feel this type of development is appropriate for the site. Member Smith commented that he also could not support the project because: l) the project is not scaled down in density from the neighboring projects, 2) that the traffic problem on Vernon Avenue has not been adequately studied, and 3) that we need to stop and take a look at the other projects being constructed or proposed for Vernon Avenue. Member Smith moved that .it be referred back to the Community Development and Planning Commission. Member Richards then offered a motion for approval of the proposal for these reasons: 1) it has received staff support and the unanimous support of the Planning Commission,.2) it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, 3) -the storm water drainage problem has been solved, 4) the sidewalk issue has been addressed, 5) the traffic congestion /signalization problem on Vernon Avenue has been addressed, 6) it is less than the maximum density allowed by the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with the density in the entire area, 7) the landscape bond will insure that the City has input as to sizing and selection of landscaping to be put on the property, 8) there is a buffer of 400 feet from the site to the nearest home which is greater than the.Council has approved for multi - family units in the southwest. quadrant, 9) that the property is being developed for residential as anticipated, and that approval be subject to payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $26,400. Member Smith noted that he had made a prior motion. Mayor Courtney responded that if that was the intent he would call for a second to Member Smith's motion. Member Kelly then seconded the motion made by Member Smith to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission. Attorney Erickson commented that the Council had granted preliminary approval of the project on a 4 to 1 vote with conditions that have been met. The process has been to then bring the proposal back for final approval which needs a 4 to l vote minimum for the rezoning of the property. Where that vote is not likely to be obtained it has been the policy to send it to the staff to prepare findings and facts for a decision by the Council and the reasons for that decision so that there will be a sustainable argument before any court. Mr. Erickson opined that if the Council is inclined to deny the rezoning that staff be instructed to prepare the findings for the Council's review and action at an upcoming meeting. He also advised that by statute plats that are not acted upon within 120 days from the date of application are deemed approved. Member Turner then said that she had intended to second the motion made by Member Richards for these reasons: 1) the proposed land use is consistent with the. Comprehensive Plan, 2) that a balanced land use including single family homes, multi - family units, commercial and office areas are consistent with the City's Mission Statement in maintaining Edina as a.premier community, 3) that the issues identified at First Reading regarding storm water drainage, sidewalk along Vernon and having the Traffic Safety Committee look at the traffic situation on Vernon have been addressed: She said she agreed that we should again pursue with Hennepin County the issue of speed reduction on Vernon Avenue. Member Turner concluded that the reasons were not there for her to refer the matter back to the Planning Commission. Member Richards commented that if this is referred back to the Planning Commission that we should get their reasons for recommending approval of the proposed project at 135 units and why it should not be less or more. Both Members Smith.and Kelly concurred that the issue for the proposed property is density. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion to refer the matter back-to the Planning Commission. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. :FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS (7450 METRO BLVD) APPROVED.. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on-,file.. Planner Larsen advised that the subject property is the former warehouse distribution center for General Electric Company, located at 7.450 Metro Boulevard, =and A s zoned PID- Planned Industrial District. The site is 7.78 acres in size and is-developed with an office - warehouse building containing 114,249 square feet., The.proponent, Golden Valley Microwave Foods, has submitted a request to allow the construction of an addition to the building containing 18,560 square .feet. 'The addition would provide freezer space and a new loading dock. In .addition, the existing warehouse space would be converted to production and warehouse space. The amount and location 'of office space would remain unchanged. Mr. Larsen explained that.there are currently 90 parking spaces on the site. Following the expansion and remodeling 239 spaces will be provided. The Zoning Ordinance requires.parking.at one space per 400 square feet or the sum -of the requirements for each individual use, whichever is greater. In this case, the sum of the individual use yields 239 spaces and one-space per 400 square feet requires 306 spaces. Golden Valley Microwave Foods will initially have 35 -40 office employees and three shifts of 50 employees each. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the.. .,employees does not conform to Ordinance requirements for landscaping and screening. The Community Development and Planning Commission recommended that the landscaping be_ upgraded and the proponent has subsequently submitted a revised landscape plan which does conform to the.Ordinance and will.increase perimeter plantings and provide a visual buffer on the east side. The parking.to building - setback along portions of the north side of the building fail to provide the required 10 foot setback.. The non- conforming five foot setback is proposed to remain following.the remodeling and addition. Mr. Larsen pointed out that at its current facility on. Washington Avenue the plant discharges wastes into. the sanitary sewer system which at times cause a blockage of the system. The proponent has submitted plans for a system at the new site which is intended to eliminate this problem. The plans have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The request was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of April 1, 1987 and approval of the final development plan was recommended based on the following: 1) the proposal is a good re -use of the building, 2).the parking quantity variance should be granted because more than enough parking is provided to allow for initial occupancy and growth, and 3) the requested five foot building to parking setback variance should be granted. Approval was recommended conditioned on: a) final approval of the sewage treatment plan by City Engineer, and b) painting the existing warehouse to match the new addition. Member Smith asked what assurances the City will have that there will be no problem with the sewage. Joe'Niedermeyer, plant engineer for Golden Valley. Microwave Foods, . explained that the problem has been the oil used for popcorn and the emulsifying of detergents in the sewer which causes the blockage. The proposed plan would provide a miniature sewer treatment plant in.their food processing plant which would be.a dedicated,system and which will dispose of the solid wastes. The solid wastes will be hauled from the property once a day. No further comment or objection being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to 1) final approval of the sewage treatment plan by the City Engineer and ongoing monitoring thereof pursuant to a signed recordable agreement acceptable to the City and 2) painting of the existing warehouse to match the new addition: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR GOLDEN VALLEY MICROWAVE FOODS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Golden Valley Microwave Foods, 7450 Metro Boulevard, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards Resolution adopted. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT GRANTED FOR ARENSEON ACRES PARK. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented_ the request for a Conditional Use Permit for Arneson Acres Park generally located south of West 70th Street and.west of West Shore Drive. He advised that the Zoning Ordinance requires a Conditional Use Permit for publicly owned civic and cultural buildings in the R -1 Zoning District. The Edina .Park and Recreation Department has applied for a permit to allow the renovation and expansion of the Arneson home to house the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Garden Council. Mr. Larsen said that a master plan for development of Arneson Acres Park has been drafted which explains the history and purpose of the groups as well as the intended use of the park buildings and grounds. It also explains the proposed funding for park development. The master plan has received approval by the Edina Park Board and has also been presented to the City Council on an informational basis. Mr. Larsen pointed out that development of the existing house as a headquarters for the two groups would occur in two phases. Phase I would start immediately and would involve remodeling within the existing structure to create meeting rooms, storage space, work and exhibit spaces. Phase II which is planned for 1988 would expand the house by 1,750 square feet. Total area in the house would be 6;500 square feet following the expansion. The addition would provide more office,.exhibit and storage space. Other elements of the park master plan include development of formal gardens, an extensive pathway system, a water feature, expanded parking and construction of anew maintenance garage and additional greenhouse. Mr. Larsen said the request for the Conditional Use Permit was heard by the Community Development and Planning Commission at its meeting of April 1, 1987 and approval was recommended. John Rogan, 4720 West 70th Street, Asked if the - addition would be an additional building and if there would be another entrance off West 70th Street. Mr. Larsen responded that the addition would be made to the existing house and that there would be only the one entrance . to the park. Joseph Florenzano,.4712 West-70th Street, reiterated his concerns that he had submitted by letter regarding 1) restrictive covenants on the property, 2) additional traffic and parking problems, 3) restrictions to-be placed on.the use of the property, and 4) the future use or expansion planned for the property. Mr..Florenzano said he was opposed to granting the Conditional Use Permit. Bob.Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, responded that he was not aware of any restrictions placed on the property when it was donated to the City in 1969. Manager Rosland explained the property was donated to the City as a life estate and that Mr. Arneson resided in the home on the property until his death in 1982. He said Mr. Arnesons's hope for this property was that it would have a formal garden area which .would bring people into the park. It is expected that additional traffic will be minimal and if additional parking is needed the master plan provides for that. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks and Recreation, presented a graphic of the park master plan and explained the features of the park. With regard to the anticipated use.of the property, Manager Rosland explained that the Historical Society is a small active organization that has a large collection. They meet once a month and are looking for space so that their collection can be open to public viewing. The Garden Council meets once a month. Each spring the. Garden Council organizes the nine Garden Clubs to order and plant seeds for the 54 gardens that are planted in the community. The City.may use the house for additional meetings which would be limited. Ruth Johnson, Garden Council member, said that she was opposed to the.shared use of the house and that she felt Mr. Arneson had intended it to be used solely by the Garden Council. Ronald Rich, 7008 West Short Drive, said he was concerned how this would impact the neighborhood and.that a decision should be postponed until the neighbors could have a chance to look at the proposal for the park. Member Richards asked if notices had been mailed to the neighborhood and suggested that a meeting be held, so that the neighbors could have an opportunity to be heard and then take whatever action is required. Mr. Kojetin said that the master plan for the park has not been presented to neighborhood as no long range plan for development of the park has been adopted. Present policy is that when a park is scheduled for development -hearings are held to get neighborhood input. He said that the request before the Council is for a Conditional Use Permit for the Arneson house only. Mr. Larsen explained that a sign was placed on West 70th Street 10 days prior to the hearing by the Planning Commission and that no mailed notice or publication other than the sign is: required by statute. Mailed notices of the public hearing by the Council was mailed to all residences within 500 feet of the entire perimeter of the site 10 days prior, advising that a Conditional Use Permit had been applied for to allow expansion of the building and use by the Edina Historical.Society and the Edina Garden Council. Member Smith asked what problems would be created by delaying a decision by the Council on the permit. Member Kelly said that Phase II (building expansion) has been targeted as a goal of the 1988 Centennial to raise $250,000 and that the Centennial Commission is ready to proceed with that challenge upon Council approval of the Conditional Use Permit and that for this reason a decision should not be delayed. Fred Jaeger, 7100 West Short.Drive stated that he had not received notice nor had his neighbors to the north. Jim Coppick, 7024 West Drive, also questioned whether there were restrictive covenants on the property and asked about the park plan. Mr. Kojetin then reviewed the plans for renovation of the Arneson house and master plan for the park and Foster Dunwiddie, architect, showed and reviewed the plans for the expansion. There being no further public comment, Member Smith commented that the City Attorney had advised the Council that there were no restrictive covenants on the property, that the proposal is for a shared use that will benefit two active civic organizations, that the addition will not be built unless the funds are raised through donations which may possibly be solicited by the Centennial Commission, that the Historical Society has a valuable collection which is presently being stored under not the best conditions, and that completion of the master park plan will be an asset to the City. Member Smith then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ARNESON ACRES PARK WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Ordinance No. 825 (The Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Ordinance No. 825 have been satisfied; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to the City of Edina for Arneson Acres Park for building expansion and use by the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Garden Council. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards Resolution adopted. Member Richards commented that he voted no because he felt there should be a more thorough discussion on the subject. FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR EVANSON ADDITION. Planner Larsen advised that the subject. property is generally located north of West 78th Street and east of March Road. He recalled that preliminary plat approval had been granted by the Council; at its meeting of March 16, 1987. The subdivision request would create one new buildable lot. The existing home. on the southerly lot would be removed and the existing home on the northerly portion of the property would remain. Staff would recommend final plat approval subject to.payment of a subdivision dedication.fee based on a land value of $40,000. Mr. Larsen said that the proponent, John Laurent, was present to answer any questions. No comment or objection being heard, Member Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption;_ subject to, payment of a subdivision dedication fee of $3,200.00: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR EVANSON ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the certain plat entitled " EVANSON ADDITION ", platted by Roger C. Evanson and Marilyn B. Evanson, husband and wife, and Preferred Mortgage Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, and First Minnesota Savings Bank, F.S.B., a United States corporation and John L. Laurent and Associates, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, and presented at the _regular meeting of the.City Council of April 20, 1987, be and is hereby granted final :plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. SKATE BOARD RAMPS TO REGULATED AS ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. Mayor Courtney reiterated his opposition to skate board ramps because of their potential danger, appearance and attraction for children. Planner Larsen recalled that the Council had discussed the regulation of skate board ramps at their meeting of April 6, 1987 and had directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance for consideration. Prior to that regulation of skate board ramps was initially considered when the Council was reviewing controls.of "Nuisances ". At that time staff suggested a minimum setback of 50 feet from all lot lines for ramps which would effectively prohibit ramps on all but extremely large lots. The Council considered and rejected that approach. Subsequently, staff has been attempting to find out if other communities have established specific regulations for skate board ramps but have been unable to find any. Mr. Larsen explained that under existing rules we would treat skate board ramps as accessory structures. Ramps could be located in the rear yard only and would need to provide at least a 5 foot setback from an interior side or rear lot line. Ramps would be included in the 25 percent lot coverage calculation. He noted that tennis courts are subject to these same setback requirements but are not included in lot coverage. The Zoning Ordinance requires that swimming pools provide a minimum setback of 10 feet from side and rear property lines. In addition, Ordinance No. 434 requires that pools be enclosed by a non - climbable fence at least 4 feet in height. The increased setback and fencing requirements may be appropriate for skate board ramps. Fencing could help control unauthorized access and may also be used to provide a visual screen. Mr. Larsen presented a draft amendment to the.Zoning Ordinance which would establish these controls for skate board ramps. The ordinance amendment would regulate ramps which are over 120 square feet in area and would limit height to 8 feet. It was noted that the 120 square foot threshold is the point at which a building permit is required for an accessory structure. Mr. Larsen said another option would be to prohibit skate board ramps entirely. A prohibition would have to promote the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. It would also need to be shown as reasonable and free from arbitrariness and discrimination. He added that certain construction techniques may help to reduce noise levels generated by ramp use, i.e. heavier skating surface and insulation. Hours of use could also be limited to prevent nighttime disturbance. Mr. Larsen summarized the options as follows: 1) Do nothing - skateboard ramps would be subject to a 5 foot setback requirement and would be included in lot coverage, 2) Adopt special requirements for skate board ramps as per draft ordinance amendment and include ramps in lot coverage, and 3) Ban skate board ramps - must be justified and may be subject to court challenge. Member Turner commented that she liked Option 2 because it is consistent with how we regulate other attractive nuisances and because it defines skate board ramps covered by the proposed restrictions as over 120 square feet in area so that it does not eliminate the small ramps. Member Turner moved that First Reading of the ordinance amendment as presented be scheduled. Motion was seconded by Member. Kelly. Member Smith commented that there are other attractive nuisances such as trampolines which are not regulated and that if other communities are not regulating skate board ramps why should we. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Turner, Courtney Nays: Richards,,Smith . Mr. Larsen advised the Council that the draft ordinance would amend the Zoning Ordinance.which would require a favorable 4/5 vote by the Council. Member Richards.said he did not intend to change his vote and questioned going through the.process for First Reading if it would not receive the required favorable vote. Member Turner then moved for reconsideration of the motion, seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes:. Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays Kelly Member Smith then moved adoption of Option 1 - Skate board ramps would be subject to a 5.foot setback requirement and would be included in lot coverage. Motion was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Richards,. Smith, Turner Nays: Courtney FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE N0: 825 -A18 CONTINUED TO 5/4/87. Manager Rosland stated that staff would recommend First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A18 To Allow Bagged Leaves and Grass on the Curb-for Pick -up in the Morningside area be continued to May 4, 1987: because it would amend the Zoning Ordinance which requires published notice prior to First Reading. Motion of Member Kelly was .seconded by Member Turner to continue First Reading of Ordinance No. 825- A18.to May 4, 1987. Ayes:. Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. (Member Kelly left the meeting at this point.) BID AWARDED FOR CITY HALL CARPETING. Manager Rosland presented tabulation of bids for approximately 1,400 square yards of carpeting for City Hall showing Merit Supply at $6.99 per square yard, Noah Williams Associates, Inc. at $7.70 per square yard and Fred G. Anderson at $9.27 per square yard. Staff would recommend award of bid to Noah Williams Associates, Inc. Although the bid submitted by Merit Supply was lower, upon having the carpet analyzed by an expert from Dayton's Commercial Interiors, Inc., it was determined that the carpet bid by Merit Supply did not meet the yarn specifications. Further, Merit Supply was unable to supply the color specified. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith for award of bid for carpeting for City Hall to Noah Williams Associates, Inc. at $7.70 per square yard. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR RECYCLING AND PARK MAINTENANCE TRUCK BODY. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Recycling and Park maintenance truck to recommended low bidder, LaHass Manufacturing and Sales at $7,973.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR SENIOR CITIZENS BUS.. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for one 10 passenger senior citizens bus to recommended low bidder, Tillson Bus & Equipment Company, at $28,238.00 with trade -in. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON VAN. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for a 1987 one ton van to recommended low bidder, Suburban Chevrolet at $11,936.29. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC WEED CONTROL PROGRAM - INDIANHEAD LAKE. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for the 1987 Aquatic Weed Control Program for Indianhead Lake to sole bidder, Clean Flo Laboratories at $5,071.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 14 1987 APPROVED. There being no requests under Section A or Section B for approval or denial, motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member,Turner to approve the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of April 14, 1987, "acknowledging Section C of the minutes. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: None Motion carried. UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY. Member Turner called the Council's attention to a notice of a public meeting for the I -494 Corridor Study on Wednesday, May 6, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina Community Center Auditorium for the purpose of discussing potential transportation improvements in the I -494 corridor. She urged the members to attend the public information meeting. Member Turner said that prior to that meeting, on Monday, May 4 at the regular Council Meeting, the consultant for the study, Dick Wolsfeld of BRW, will make a presentation to the Edina Council to help them understand where the study is at this point and to ask questions. Engineer Hoffman added that 15 developers are being asked to attend `a breakfast meeting on Friday, April 24, 1987 to let them know what is going on and the impacts of car pooling, ramp control, etc. and to keep the trip levels'at a certain volume for future developments. Member Smith. requested that any reading materials be given to the Council in advance.of the May 4 meeting. Mr.. Hoffman said that any such information will be placed in the Council packets.. No action was taken. (Member.Kelly returned to the meeting at this point.) FINAL PLAN APPROVED FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT FRANCE AV AND MINNESOTA DR. Engineer Hoffman advised that plans for installation of a traffic signal at the France Avenue (CASH 17) and Minnesota Drive.(West 77th Street) intersection.have been prepared. Hennepin County and the City of Bloomington have requested the City's participation in this project.. The normal participation split for a. traffic signal installation -is 25% county and 75% local. In this case, the signal is on the border of Edina and Bloomington which would result in a cost split of 37.5% for each city. Mr. Hoffman explained that this signal installation is important to the City of Edina for the upcoming development of the Hedberg property and for improved access to the Edinborough project. Mr. Hoffman presented the following estimated cost .figure totals: Bloomington $38,000.00, Edina $34,200.00 and Hennepin County $22,800.00. Additionally, Bloomington and Hennepin County will absorb all future maintenance costs for the signal. Staff would recommend that the Council take the following action: A) Final plan approval of the traffic signal authorization, B). Resolution-authorizing the Mayor and Manager to sign the agreement specifying the cost participation of 37.5% of the project, and C) Resolution authorizing use of Municipal State Aid Funds on a county road (France Avenue) up to $35,000.00 for Edina's share of the costs involved. A discussion developed as to.the possibility of assessing part of Edina's share of the cost to the Edinborough project and to the proposed Hedberg project because those projects help generate the traffic for the signal. Member Richards commented that it does not.make sense to assess for this cost when we have the Municipal State Aid Funds which are there for that purpose and can only be used on the Municipal State Aid system. Attorney Erickson stated that the theory of assessment is that the value is increased by the amount of the assessment and the City would have to prove that the Edinborough and Hedberg projects were increased in value. Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the planned traffic signal construction of France Avenue at Minnesota Drive is a cooperative project involving Hennepin County and the cities of Bloomington and Edina; and WHEREAS,,the Construction Plan for signalization of France Avenue at Minnesota Drive, C.P. 8614, S.A.P. No. 120 - 020 -01, 120- 171 -01, has been prepared and presented to the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said Plan be in all things approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Smith introduced the following resolutions and moved their adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute an agreement with Hennepin County and the City of Bloomington to provide for the participation by Edina of thirty seven and one -half percent of the cost of the traffic signal construction of France Avenue at Minnesota Drive. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it has been deemed advisable and necessary for the City of Edina to participate in the cost of a construction project located on C.S.A.H. No. 17 within the limits of said municipality, and WHEREAS, said construction project has been approved by the Commissioner of Transportation and identified in his records as S.A.P. No. 120- 020 -21; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That we do hereby appropriate from our Municipal State Aid Street Funds the sum of $35,000.00 to apply toward the construction of said project and request the Commissioner of Transportation to approve this authorization. Motion for adoption of the resolutions was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly,. Richards Resolutions adopted. SPRINKLING BAN DISCUSSED: PENALTIES APPROVED. Manager Rosland recalled that at its last meeting the Council had discussed the odd /even lawn sprinkling ordinance and that the penalty for violation was a misdemeanor which involved a court appearance. -Staff has looked_ at an ordinance amendment which would provide a- schedule of fines that would eliminate much of the prosecuting time spent by the -City legal staff. Staff would recommend for court approval a.fine of $40.00 for the first offense, $100.00 maximum for the second offense (petty misdemeanor) and the third violation within a 12 -month period would be a misdemeanor (maximum of $700.00 or imprisonment not to exceed 90 days plus prosecution costs) which would require a court appearance. Engineer Hoffman explained that the odd /even day sprinkling ordinance has been in- effect since 1981 and that the last time this was discussed.was in 1983 which also was a very dry year. In anticipation of a very dry year in 1987 strict enforcement is recommended. He stated that if the odd /even sprinkling ordinance were strictly adhered to there would be no potential water problem. Mr. Hoffman said a warning ticket would be issued the first time a violation is observed and -a record would be kept as to the location and on any 'following violation the fine schedule would go into effect. A mailed notice.would be sent to all residences advising of the odd /even sprinkling ordinance and the penalties for violation. Member Smith suggested that the mailed notice beiin a format that would catch the attention of.the reader. Member Smith moved approval of the fine schedule for violation of the sprinkling ordinance as follows: 1) $40.00 for the first offense, 2) $100.00 maximum for the second offense, and 3) , misdemeanor penalty for the third offense within 12 months, with mailed notice to the citizens and an effective date of April 21, 1987. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICES CONTRACT DISCUSSED - CONTRACT TO BE RENEGOTIATED FOR 1988 AND 1989. Manager Rosland referred to a memorandum prepared by David Velde, City Sanitarian, with regard to the.1988 -89 Public.Health Nursing Services Contract. Mr. Velde had advised that the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee has been studying the options available to the City of Edina for the delivery of personal public health nursing services to Edina residents for calendar years 1988 and 1989. The Committee recommended that the Council renegotiate a contract with the Bloomington Division of Public Health for public health nursing services for 1988 and 1989; that the cost should not exceed a 4% increase for each year of the contract, and that if the City does not reach such agreement with Bloomington that it should seek competitive bids for this contract. Virginia McCollister, member of the Committee, stated that the Bloomington Division of Public Health has contracted for a number of years to provide public health nursing services to Edina. During the past year the Committee has looked at their services very carefully and the general consensus of the Committee is that Edina is served well and the Committee was impressed by the range of public health services provided. The Committee decided they should initiate a,systematic evaluation strategy to determine both the appropriateness of the services delivered through the contract and the clients' reaction to those services. This evaluation process will be an important tool for monitoring contractor performance and will also serve as a tool for reviewing future bid proposals. Mrs. McCollister said that if we have to contract with a hospital based home health care agency the various services will be subcontracted and many people have difficulty in receiving services from various agencies. There also is the danger of loss of continuity and hidden costs in the quality of those services. The Committee felt that in order to maintain the present service level that the Council should consider renegotiation and if not possible to reach an agreement with Bloomington then to go to an opening bidding process. Member Smith asked if the Committee has talked to the Edina School District regarding their health nursing needs and trying to combine their needs with the City's. Mrs. McCollister said that Bloomington does contract with the School currently for the screening process. Member Smith asked if a 4% increase per year for the contract is realistic. Manager Rosland said that in the past increases have ranged from 3% to 5 %. Member Turner asked if the Committee currently does an evaluation. Mrs. McCollister said that, given the state of health care, this is one of their concerns and that they do not now have a tool to evaluate bids but would like to develop one to be used in the future. Member Smith asked if Bloomington is developing an educational program regarding AIDS that could be available to the Edina community as part of the total public health picture. Mr. Velde said that Hennepin County Public Health Department has a program that addresses AIDS but that he was not aware of anything being worked on through Bloomington. Member Smith then moved that staff be directed to renegotiate a contract with the Bloomington Division of Public Health for public health nursing services for 1988 and 1989, the cost not to exceed a 4% increase for each year of the contract and if the City does not reach such agreement with Bloomington that it seek competitive bids for the contract. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RECAP OF MARCH 21, 1987 COUNCIL /STAFF WORKSHOP DISCUSSED. Member Turner called the Council's attention to a summary of the March 21, 1987 Council /Staff workshop, drafted by Mr. Hughes, which lists in concise form the issues and goals which were identified and discussed. She said the next step in the process will be the drafting of a work program to address and implement these goals. The work program will be prepared by staff and brought back to the Council at its meeting of June 15. The Council members informally approved the summary as presented. Because of the.late hour, Member. Turner suggested that the Council delay the discussion_ on Council responsibilities until the next meeting. Member Smith asked about the progress on.the brochure to be available for the public at Council . meetings. Manager Rosland said that a first draft has prepared, that some changes are being made and that the Council will see it before it is printed. SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING HEDBERG PROPERTY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 12. Manager Rosland advised that the developers for the Hedberg property would like to meet with the Council,:'the Community Development and Planning Commission and the Park Board to go over their concept plans for the property. This would be an informal meeting "only and would allow input to the developers. The date suggested is ..May 12, 1987 at 5:00-p.m. at Braemar Clubhouse. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to hold a special'Council Meeting on May 12, 1987. at 5:00 p.m:.at.Braemar Clubhouse with the developers of the Hedberg property and to invite the Community- Development and Planning Commission and the Edina Park Board to also attend. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. - FEES AND OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES APPROVED FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK. 'Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to the Edina Park Board Minutes of April 14, 1987 and the Board's recommendations for Council action regarding Edinborough Park fees -and charges and operational guidelines. He explained that in developing the fees and charges staff looked at what other public facilities charge throughout the metropolitan area and in the City's other public facilities. He noted that a combination pass.will be available which can be used at both the Municipal Pool and the Edinborough Pool.. Because the park is new and there is no operational.. experience, Mr. Rosland said the fees and charges may have.to be adjusted later on so that the park itself does not become a burden to our ad valorem tax structure. Member Turner said that the information on the swimming pool passes was unclear. Mr. Rosland responded that it would be restated to clear up any confusion. Member Kelly moved approval of the proposed fees and charges and the operational guidelines for Edinborough Park as recommended in the Park Board Minutes of April 14, 1987. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Following some discussion, Mayor Courtney called the question: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,. Turner, Courtney Motion carried. HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT - LOT 1. BLOCK 1 WINSOR ADDITION. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined, after receipt of the petition of the owners of land affected thereby, that the following described easement for utility purposes-should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29: The North 5.00 feet of Lot-1, Block 1, WINSOR ADDITION 2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks,.in.the Edina Sun- Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3) public and conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES IN THE CITY -OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street on May 18, 1987, at 7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing on the proposed vacation of the following easement for utility purposes: The North 5.00 feet:of Lot 1, Block 1, WINSOR ADDITION All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed easement vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed easement vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same -or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk :. Motion carried.on rollcall vote, five ayes. LEGISLATION REGARDING WINE IN GROCERY STORES DISCUSSED. Member.Turner advised that the proposed legislation to allow the sale of wine in grocery stores is .moving through the House of Representatives. She recalled that at one time the Council had taken an active position against that legislation, mainly on the.issue of control. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, directing that a copy of the resolution be sent to our legislators: RESOLUTION BE IS RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby expresses its opposition to H.F. 1342/S.F. 1302 which would allow the sale of wine in grocery stores. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council urges its legislators to oppose this legislation. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. , Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney .Resolution adopted. ANNUAL REPORT OF POLICE DEPARTMENT DISCUSSED.. Member Smith.complimented the Police Department.on.their Annual Report and asked if there was some way.that it could be sent out to the citizens. He suggested that possibly funds could be raised privately for such a mailing. No action was taken. JOINT COUNCIL /SCHOOL BOARD MEETING DRAFT AGENDA DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland reported that he has been in contact with Dr. Smyth Superintendent of Schools and Sara Jones, Chair of.the School Board, regarding the agenda for the joint Council /School Board meeting scheduled for Monday, May 11 at 8:00 p.m. A tentative agenda has.been drafted as follows: 1) Community Services-Task Force Report., 2) School staff report on facilities and projections, 3) City staff report on housing and population projections, 4) Community Advisory Board needs assessment,. and 5) General discussion. The Council briefly discussed the agenda and informally gave their approval. I.A.F.F. 1275 CONTRACT DISPUTES NOTED. Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to a memorandum from John F. Maloney, President, I.A.F.F. 1275, in which he stated that there have been an excessive number of contract disputes during the last five months. Mr. Rosland explained that some of the issues in dispute are . cutting back on overtime, minimum callback and assigned acting officer. He said this will most likely go through negotiation and then arbitration. No formal action was taken. ALL VOLUNTEERS AWARDS RECEPTION NOTED. Mayor Courtney reminded the Council Members of the All Volunteers Awards Reception scheduled for Tuesday, May 28, 1987 at 5:00 p.m. at the Braemar Clubhouse and urged the Council to attend. BOND REFUNDING UPDATE GIVEN: HEARING DATE SET. Manager Rosland advised that since bond refunding was discussed.by the Council at their April 6, 1987 meeting and staff was directed to proceed with the advance refunding of the 1985 Tax Increment Bonds, that interest rates have taken a sharp increase and that the amount of savings originally projected has been substantially reduced. Staff would recommend that a hearing date be set for May 4, 1987 on the issuance of General. Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds so that the City would be in a position to respond to the bond market when and if interest rates drop to achieve the amount of savings originally projected. Currently, the amount of present value savings that could be expected under current market conditions has dropped to about $230,000. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") as follows: 1. The City has issued its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985, dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000 (the "Series 1985 Bonds "). It has been proposed that the City issue its general obligation tax increment,.refunding bonds (the "Refunding Bonds ") in order to refund in advance of their - maturity all or a portion of the Series 1985 Bonds. Pursuant to Section 1313(b)(3) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 in order for the interest on the Refunding Bonds to be exempt from.federal income taxation it is necessary for the City Council to hold a public hearing on the issuance of the Refunding Bonds within one year prior to the date of issuance of the Refunding Bonds. 2. A public hearing on the proposal that the City issue the Refunding Bonds is hereby called and shall be held by this Council on May 4, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. The actions of the staff of the.City in causing a notice of the public hearing to be published in the Edina Sun - Current is hereby ratified and confirmed and the form of such notice of public hearing is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 4/20/87: General Fund $296,192.87, Art Center $2;076.83, Golf Course Fund $12,740.65, Recreation Center Fund $2,517.56, Utility Fund $15,778.85, Liquor Dispensary Fund $80,175.03, Construction Fund $74.00`, Total $409,555.79; and for confirmation of payment,of the following.claims dated 3/31/87: General Fund $1,205,663:22, Art Center $1,042.58; Swimming Pool Fund $91.54, Golf Course Fund $4,562.37, Recreation Center Fund $9,532.75, Gun Range Fund $98.38, Utility Fund $18,127.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $241,234.57, Total $1,480.353.02. Motion carried.on rollcall vote, five ayes. LOCATION MAPIII' IN WS LOT DIVIS10 ME IN NUMBER LD -87 -3 L O C A T 10 N 6820 Cheyenne Circle EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT \ LD -87 -3 Generally Located: Burton McGlynn 6820 Cheyenne Circle North west of Valley View Road and south of Cheyenne Circle. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the applicant's property is currently developed with a single family-dwelling unit. The property is essentially landlocked, and therefore is non - conforming. Access to the site is gained by a shared driveway entering from Valley View Road. The driveway is narrow and difficult to negotiate because of the steep grade. Mr. Larsen added the applicant desires to obtain a 851 square foot parcel from the adjacent neighbor to the northeast. Refer to survey. By obtaining this parcel, access to the applicants home would be improved by entering from Cheyenne Circle. Furthermore, the non - conforming status of the property would be eliminated as 50 feet of frontage would be realized on Cheyenne Circle. Both the applicant's property and the adjacent property would maintain conforming setbacks to the dwellings. Lot areas of the parcels would remain consistent with those in the surrounding area. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval as presented. The proponent, Mr. McGlynn was present. Mr. Bailey moved for approval. Mrs. Shaw seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 29, 1987 LD -87 -3 Burton McGlynn 6828 Cheyenne Circle Generally Located: North west of Valley View Road and south of Cheyenne Circle. The applicant's property is currently developed with a single family dwelling unit. The property is essentially landlocked, and therefore is non - conforming. Access to the site is gained by a shared driveway entering from Valley View Road. The driveway is narrow and difficult to negotiate because of the steep grade. The applicant desires to obtain a 851 square foot parcel from the adjacent neighbor to the northeast. Refer to survey. By obtaining this parcel, access to the applicants home would be improved by entering from Cheyenne Circle. Furthermore, the non - conforming status of the property would be eliminated as 50 feet of frontage would be realized on Cheyenne Circle. Both the applicant's property and the adjacent property would maintain conforming setbacks to the dwellings. Lot areas of the parcels would remain consistent with those in the surrounding area. Staff recommends approval as presented. ,ERTIFICATE UF SUP-)VE�- rz �C— Z5. .� 4 / / Irvo�e�r�► -aFno Ca�s�i Ty 7,66 240 LOT • / -S. F N. 33.0 • . i 1 _tip CI ti �2 f Fro me CP 6900 •,s, o • t1 / Y 1 �r 0 K s� �� Nv� JOHN E. CARD USE C RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST and Lot 1, Block 1, INDIANHEAD LAKE VIEW ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST, except that part of Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST, lying Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the Northeasterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly of said Northwest corner of said Lot 1 and Lot 1, Block 1, INDIANHEAD LAKE VIEW ADDITION, and that part of Lot 1, Block 3, INDIANHEAD CREST, lying Northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet South easterly of the Northwest corner of said Lot 1, to a point on the North- easterly line of said Lot 1, distant 50.0 feet Southeasterly of said Northwest corner of said Lot 1; WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1987. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 4th, 1987 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of May, 1987. City Clerk V.A.1 & 2 ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A18 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B(2) OF SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 825 Fi THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Repealer. Paragraph B(2) of Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. SECTION 7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRICTS EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE STATED A. General. No building or structure shall be erected, constructed or placed on any property in the City, and no building or structure or property in the City shall be used for any purpose, unless in full compliance with the restrictions and requirements of this ordinance and other applicable ordinances of the City. B. Trash Storaae. 1. All Properties Except. Single Dwelling Unit and Double Dwelling Unit Buildings. All solid waste material, debris, refuse, garbage or similar material shall be kept within closed containers designed for such purpose. Said containers shall not be located in the front yard and shall be completely screened from view from all lot lines and streets. 2. Single Dwelling Unit and Double Dwelling Unit Buildings. All solid waste material, debris, refuse, garbage or similar material shall be kept within closed containers designed for such purpose. Said containers shall not be located in the front yard and shall not be visible from the front lot line. C. Dwelling Units Prohibited in Accessory Buildings, Temporary 10 Buildings, Trailers and Recreational Vehicles. No accessory building, temporary building, trailer or recreational vehicle in any district shall be used for a dwelling unit or units, except for accessory buildings which are specifically allowed for residential use by this ordinance. D. Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use. 1. Customary home occupations which are permitted as an accessory use by this ordinance shall comply with the following conditions: (a) only the residents of the dwellling unit are employed on the lot or within the dwelling unit; (b) no exterior structural modifications are. made to change the residential character and appearance of the lot or any buildings or structures on the lot; (c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities, except parking, shall occur; (d) no signs of any ::ind shall be used to identify the use; (e) all parking demands generated by the use shall be accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway 7 -1 ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON THE CURB ON A TEMPORARY BASIS FOR A PORTION OF NORTHEAST EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting "(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4 and by adding a new paragraph "(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows: "(b) Within that portion of the City located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue, grass clippings and leaves suitable for composting may be placed next to the street or curb for pickup provided that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored within a plastic bag designed for such a purpose, and ii) placed at the curb no more than 12 hours prior to the scheduled pickup." Sec. 2. The provision of Sec. 4(b) of this Ordinance No. 711 shall automatically cease and be of no further effect on December 1, 1987. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication, but not earlier than August 1, 1987. IV.A.1. IV. A.2. RESPONSES TO MAILED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE CURBSIDE PICK -UP OF BAGGED LEAVES AND GRASS CLIPPINGS. 1 Aerial view from Pagef U77 Le 55 Ud' C) eYS d Vr;c :z._ �.:. Ye, d Crlon ror le Y POST b 20,f S I teY ale THe �. . oY the �� 1/�e �i IN har _ he y SAO o �rogra -r' W e Led y e S e e ✓�' �'"� b 7- S S i c K 7- e S i S d � 0� GU , J`0 /! . Ej A� rv.W p �.� M a N7,q - \ re 363314 d, Ye S KJ e n rd %" �/ i �e r �1 a nt. ��. ze a-14 L 4, Ur �- - -- { D- �Llvrtc a� d.a-e- V V �!\/ J�3Sr `t It �i . •.' _• � ,mar. 'sr u -� �� � � Gr-� � � .TlGP�GI�' Q'Lt�L AG� - - �. � 7) .� - , �` �. �-� �f - -- -� -- -- - -�. _ =_ - -- - - _ - -- - - -� - - -- - _I - - ... -- - - --_ _ - - I _, .. 01AAA1. SCHOFFMAN 7 ALDEN DRIVE I NNEAPOL[S, MN. 55416 C =Ir All Mrs H M Frederickson 4235 Alden Dr Minneapolis MN 55416 i i "wtn f. Larsen i �I 4018 West 44 Edina, I1N 55424 --._ O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves. and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. C / , N O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina - DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. °��oej Mrs. Lawrence H. Armstrong 1229 West Fora- Fourth Street Edina, \1\ 55424 4229 West 44th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 April 30, 198? City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55424 Gentlemen: I am firmly opposed to amending the Zoning Ordi- nancean the Nuisance Ordinance to allow the pick -up of leaves and grass clippings from the street curbs in the rviorningside area of Edina. Allowing such placement of these materials at curbside for pick -up (presumably once a week ?) would make this portion of the City unattractive) for those periods of time between pick -ups. If the refuse hauler wishes to pick up these materials for composting, he should abide by the present regulations and pick it up from wherever he now picks up such materials. kvvet r N ok Arms Lod. 1 0� , 4- f��i April 27, 1987 City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Gentlemen: With regard to the Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance which would allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup, we OPPOSE STRONGLY THIS PILOT,PROGRAM! We maintain it will only prove to clutter the streets of Morningside; that it could become the habit of many folks to place their leaves and grass -- perhaps even tree limbs, and who knows what else - -on the curb a day or two before the designated pickup time just to get it out of the way. Further, our rates for garbage removal were just recently increased by a hauler who presently picks up our clippings and leaves, and whom we assume will continue to do so, absent this Amendment. Should this program pass, it is likely our present collector will NOT then pick up our grass and leaves, leaving us no alternative but to enlist somebody else. We are curious as to why this particular trial program was slated exclusively for the MORNINGSIDE AREA ONLY? We challenge the City of Edina to approach the good people in the COUNTRY CLUB and WEST EDINA districts for their approval instead - -even though it be for trial purposes only. If it flies there, we MAY join them. ,sincerely yours, Mr. and Mrs. Blake P. Ma le rg 4235 Scott Terrace Edina, MN 55416 BPM:mm .idlu4� 60- a'VVi.iJV♦ 'y9 SUNNYSIDF. RD. EDINA. MN 55424 N 0 T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of.bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give-testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th-Street Edina, MN 55424 Gentlemen: 3911 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 April 29, 1987 Subject: Bagged Leaves and Grass Clippings for Morningside Area of Edina There must be more than.one refuse hauler covering subject area. Would all haulers cooperate in this test? All residences do not have the same pickup day or days. This would mean bags on the curb in some part of the area every working day. A drive through St. Louis Park prior to refuse pickup is a strong argument against curb pickup. However, they apparently have no restriction on the material that can be put out. The view is often pretty bad. If a trial basis is decided on, refuse should be limited to only bagged leaves or grass clippings. Placement of bags on the curb should be limited to the evening prior to the morning of scheduled ickup (which from a cosmetic standpoint should be early morning. If a hauler misses a pickup, bags should be removed from the curb until the next scheduled pickup. Sincerely, Donald B. Arndt �4A N O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M'. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987, The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside. area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. L WENDELL L. HALL 4247 Alden Drive Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Telephone 612.926 -7795 yea � WZel- April 28, 1987 City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Council Members: We have been residents of the Morningside area for over twenty years and wish to voice our objections to the proposed ordinance change which would allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. Curbside placement of such material is not aesthetically pleasing and would lead to a deteriorating appearance of the neighborhood. Drive through the area of St. Louis Park just north of us late Sunday afternoons or early Monday mornings to see what curbside pickup can look like. Z5TGregory ur Sandra M. Murphy 4311 Morningsi p a Road IV.A.l. & A.2. RESPONSES TO MAILED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE CURBSIDE PICK -UP OF BAGGED LEAVES AND GRASS CLIPPINGS - RECEIVED MONDAY, MAY 4. r r IA-421. 0q 32EddzsiC --Af i,,En C> p 4242 02itnE1 OTVEnuF- outfi ��innea�o�is, AinnFiota 55416 G ��r.Gcxya� 'V. y •A�� �� -rte � � ���� �� . Lt��r -�.J i�L,�v �'�-��L N O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning. Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside .area of Edina DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801.West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. n y-, k-c j-)) C) c�-� � 5 bc�J i red rES�n ut - � � ��{� a tic . %1 \<�r1 e Y1Dkc�%1 . --j A N O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY. COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of.bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina DATE OF HEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit 'the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. a4z i N O T I C E OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL TO: All Property Owners Within the Morningside Area of Edina PURPOSE: Amendment of the Zoning Ordinance and Nuisance Ordinance to allow placement of. bagged leaves and grass clippings on the curb for pickup on a trial basis for the Morningside area of Edina DATE OF BEARING: May 4, 1987 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 P. M. PLACE OF HEARING: City Council Chambers Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street HOW TO PARTICIPATE: 1. Submit a letter to the address below expressing your views, and /or 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony for or against the proposal. FURTHER INFORMATION: City of Edina Recycling Program 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 (612) 927 -8861 DATE OF NOTICE: April 24, 1987 The City of Edina has received a request from a refuse hauler who serves the Morningside area to permit the curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings for composting. City ordinances presently do not allow the placement of such materials at the curb. Therefore, the purpose of the hearing is to consider amending City ordinances to allow curbside pickup of leaves and grass clippings. The proposed ordinance amendments would affect only that portion of Edina located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue. It is further proposed that the ordinance amendments would automatically terminate on December 31, 1987, in order to evaluate the effects of curbside pickup. � o/ �7$17 r i� ? tz . I a -\, -" /Ile et 304 1 , l, IV. A. 3. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian John Schirmang, Building Inspector SUBJECT: Amendment to Ordinance No. 434 DATE: April 22, 1987 Our present swimming pool ordinance prohibits electrical conductors within 15 feet of a swimming pool. The State Electrical Code permits electrical conductors within 10 feet of a swimming pool providing the electrical conductors are elevated above the swimming pool by specific distances; such elevations being determined by the voltage carried by the conductors. This amendment will change our electrical conductor separation from the swimming pool from 15 feet to 10 feet. The 10 foot separation appears to be a reasonable safety distance for electrical conductors. However, we believe that we should not allow electrical conductors to cross over a swimming pool and we propose to leave language referring to overhead or underground electrical conductors intact. Please place this amendment on the May 4, 1987 City Council agenda. We are asking that second reading of the Amendment be waived because a building permit is being withheld pending adoption of this Ordinance amendment. ORDINANCE NO. 434 -A10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 434 CHANGING THE ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SWIMMING POOLS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph (b) of Section 19 is hereby amended to read: "(b) No current - carrying electrical conductors shall cross residential swimming pools, either overhead or underground or within 10 feet of such pools except as necessary for pool lighting or pool accessories. Sec. 2. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: ATTEST: May 4, 1987 Waived s/ MARCELLA M. DAEHN City Clerk s/ C. WAYNE COURTNEY Mayor �s. VI. A. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Ken Rosland FROM: Ceil Smith SUBJECT: PUBLIC OFFICIAL /POLICE PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY DATE: May 1, 1987 Attached is a letter from Dave Crowther, the insurance agent who has sought insurance premium quotations -for the City's Public Officials/ .Police Professional Liability Insurance coverage which are due for renewal. For the first time in three years, the rates are starting to drop as indicated in the quotations. Our Police liability premiums are up slightly because of the increased numbers of individuals reported covered under the Police Professional Liability Insurance. Last year's premium was $30,023. The Public Officials Liability Insurance premium for last year was $10,600. I am recommending Imperial Casualty and Indemnity for the Police Professional coverage, which is not the low quote at $31,968, for the following reasons: 1) As in years passed, in order to get the Public Officials Liability at the rate quoted by National Casualty of $10,625, it is necessary to insure the Police with a coverage acceptable to National Casualty. Imperial Casualty and Indemnity is acceptable. The other companies are not. 2) Imperial Casualty offers $1,000,000 annual aggregate; the other two quotes are for $500,000 annual aggregate. 3) Lastly, Imperial Casualty is offering an occurance rather than a claims - made form of coverage. The claims -made coverage is less desirable than the occurance form of coverage because of the very high potential of significantly higher premiums in subsequent years of similar coverage. Looking at the total costs for both coverages, I am recommending Scenario A per the attachment which is Imperial Casualty and National Casualty, at a total of $42,593.00, which is the low total bid. If I can answer any further questions for you, please contact me. CS /sw Attachment REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI.A. TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Ceil Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 1, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Public Officials Liability Insurance Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. National Casualty $10,625.00 2. Tudor Insurance Company 20,625.00 3. Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. 34,557.00 Department Recommendation: National Casualty $10,625.00 6 / 4W7 _41Y�,M �&11 / natu a Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi is - is not within the amount budget for the purchase. c John Wallin, Finance Director City M ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council pprove the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: land.-City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Cell Smith VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 1, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Police Professional Liability - Quotations /Bids: Company 1, WEstern World Insurance Company 2. Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. 3, Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Department Recommendation: VI.A. Amount of Quote or Bid $28,230.52 30,273.00 31,968.00 Imperial Casualty & Indemnity $31,968.00 Signature ' Department � P°^v Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is ' is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City M /E ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. n 2. I recommend as an alternative: AL HWr1S -H0nes Company 6161 Wooddale Ave. Suite 101 P.O. Box 24030 Edina, Minnesota 55424 612- 922.0301 April 29, 1987 William P. Homeyer, CPCU John R. Harris, CPCU Douglas H. Crowther David W. Crowther Ceil Smith City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Public Official / Police Professional Liability Dear Ceil, As discussed, we have approached numerous markets to quote Public Official and Police Professional Liability. I will schedule quotations in order of preference: A. Police Professional: Imperial Casualty and Indemnity Limit: $500,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Annual Aggregate Deductible: $10,000 Each Claim, Incident or Occurence Form: Occurrence Premium: $31,968 Public Official: National Casualty Company Limit: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Annual Aggregate Deductible: $5,000 Each Loss, including loss adjustment expense Form: Claims Made Premium: $10,625 B. Police Professional: Western World. Insurance Company Limit: $500,000 Each Claim $500,000 Annual Aggregate Deductible: $2,500 Each Claim Page Two Form: Claims Made Premium: $28,230.52 (Including Tax and Fees) Public Official: Tudor Insurance Company Limit: $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Annual Aggregate Deductible: $15,000 Each Loss Form: Claims Made Premium: $20,625.00 (Including Tax and Fees) C. Police Professional: Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. Limit: $500,000 Per Occurrence $500,000 Policy Aggregate Deductible: $15,000 Each Claim Form: Claims Made Premium: $30,273 Public Official: Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. Limit: $500,000 Per Occurrence $500,000 Policy Aggregate Deductible: $5,000 Each Claim Form: Claims Made Premium: $34,557 I have enclosed material from Municipal Purchasing Group, Inc. which expands on their concept (Risk Retention Group) and the terms of their quotation. As the Imperial Casualty Police Professional proposal is competitive price - wise, and remains on an occurrence form, we would recommend this program. Similarly, we would recommend the National Casualty Public Official renewal program. We have bound Imperial and National Casualty, per your instructions. Please confirm to me by May 5 that this is acceptable. Thanks. T .Regar Da id Crowther REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 1, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Annual Concrete Supply Quotations /Bids: Company 1. Johnson - Bigler Co., Inc. f 2. Model Stone Co. 3. Oscar Roberts 4. Apple Valley Ready -Mix 5. Hedberg & Sons Department Recommendation: Johnson- Bigler Co., Inc. VI. B. Consent Agenda Amount of Ouote or Bid $48.25 per Cu. Yd. No Bid Received No Bid Received No Bid Received No Bid Received $48.25 per Cu. Yd. f-! Public Works Si atur Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is V/1" is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City pager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VI.C. Consent Agenda TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Ko j et in VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 1, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Equipment Replacement Small Truck for Cushman Scooter for Ballfieid Maintenance Quotations /Bids: Company 1• Polar Chevrolet Highway 61 & County Road F White Bear Lake, MN 55110 2. 3. Department Recommendation: Amount of Quote or Bid $10,879 Polar Chevrolet $10,879 HENNEPIN COUNTY BID Signa re Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is - is not within the amount budget for the purchase, John Wallin, Finance Director City anager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Ro land, City Manager WM 0 R A N D U M TO: K 1 FROM: K j DATE: May 1, 1987 SUBJECT: Cushman Replacement with Small Truck The Cushman scooters that we have now been using for many years are getting to be very expensive in cost maintenance. The new small pick -up trucks will give us more maneuverability in our field locations throughout the city, and they are large enough to carry soil material as well as equipment for ballfield maintenance. The scooters that we purchased for over - the -road cost us $8,000. It is my recommendation that we purchase the small truck at $10,879, which is about $3000 more than the Cushman, we will be able to use the truck twelve months of the year where as the scooters are only used during the summer and fall months. The additional $3000 will come from the miscellaneous small equipment fund. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Gordon Hughes VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: May 4, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Two Harvestings of Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond -Quotations/Bids: Company 1. Midwest Aqua Care 2. NO OTHER BIDS 3. Department Recommendation: Midwest Aqua Care VI. D. Amount of Quote or Bid $8,768.00 $8,768.00 Department Finance Director's Endorsement: 14 The recommended bi is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. tl �I 0 hn Wal in, Finance Director City anager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council a rove the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kenneth Rosland, City Manage zi V11. A. Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area 300 Metro.Square Building, 7th and Robert Streets St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Tel. 612 291- 6359/TDD 291 -0904 DATE: April 30, 1987 TO: Edina City Council Members FROM: Connie Kozlak, I -494 Corridor Study Project Manager SUBJECT: I -494 Study Briefing As you know the I -494 Corridor has been the subject of a joint agency study for about a year. The Project Management Team, which includes Leslie Turner & Fran Hoffman as the Edina representatives, has recently defined some alternative roadway design concepts. These alternatives will be presented to the public at an informational meeting to be held May 6 at 7 p.m. at the Edina Community Center. We encourage you to attend this meeting. In addition, your representatives on the Project Management Team have asked me and the project consultant, Dick Wolsfeld of BRW, Inc., to explain these alternatives at your May 4 City Council meeting. I have attached the universe of alternative design concepts if you wish to review these prior to the meeting. At the meeting we will show a 14- minute video explaining the alternatives and Mr. Wolsfeld will briefly detail the portions of the alternatives that specifically affect Edina. DPF368 I DATE: April 15, 1987 TO: I -494 Project Management Team FROM: I -494 Core Group RE: Universe of Alternatives Revised: April 23, 1987 The alternatives for improvements in the I -494 Corridor have been separated into four categories: mainline alternatives, system interchanges, access inter- changes, and parallel arterial alternatives. This memo presents all the alter- natives which remain after the preliminary screening by the Project Management Team. I. MAINLINE ALTERNATIVES A. Alternative 2: Existing situation plus metered ramps, preferential access, and Travel Demand Management (TDM). B. Alternative 5: Add one general purpose lane in each direction throughout the corridor plus metered ramps, preferential access, and TOM. C. Alternative 6: Add one high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential access, and TOM. D. Alternative 8: Add two general purpose lanes in each direction throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential access, and TOM. E. Alternative 9: Add one general purpose and one HOV lane in each direction throughout the corridor, plus metered ramps, preferential access, and TOM. II. ALTERNATIVES FOR REGIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM INTERCHANGES A. CSAH 62 Interchange (See Baker Road Area Alternatives) 1. Existing situation /No build - Full diamond interchange. 2. Improve interchange and CSAH 62 /Clearwater Drive access. B. Washington Avenue /CSAH 18 /West Bush Lake Road /East Bush Lake Road Area 1. Existing situation /No build - Full diamond interchange, no access to I -494 at Washington Avenue or West Bush Lake Road. I -494 Project Management Team April 15, 1987 Page 2 2. Cloverleaf with collector - distributer (c -d) roads on I -494. Provide ramps to the east from an overpass at Washington Avenue and ramps to the west from West Bush Lake Road. 3. Semi - directional interchange with c -d roads and ramps as described above. Loops in the NW and SW quadrants. 4. Fully directional interchange with c -d roads and ramps as described above. 5. Cloverleaf with c -d roads on I -494. Provide ramps to west at Washington Avenue overpass and ramps to east at West Bush Lake Road. Adjacent frontage roads to provide property access. 6. Three -level diamond with one -way frontage roads. 7. Replace property access currently provided at CSAH 18 and East Bush Lake Road with a new interchange between East and West Bush Lake Roads. Upgrade CSAH'18 interchange and provide frontage roads across CSAH 18. C. TH 100 Interchange 1. Existing situation - Cloverleaf interchange. 2. Semi - directional interchange. 3. Fully directional interchange. D. Penn /I -35W /Lyndale Area 1. Existing situation /No build - Cloverleaf interchange 2. Fully directional interchange with ramps braided with full diamonds at Lyndale, Penn and 82nd, half diamond at 76th. 3. Fully directional interchange with half diamonds to outside at Lyndale, Penn, 82nd and 76th with improvements to the ring road consisting of Penn, Lyndale, 82nd, and 76th. 4. Fully directional interchange with full diamonds at Lyndale and Penn with access only to I -494. I -494 Project Management Team April 15, 1987 Page 3 III. ALTERNATIVES FOR INTERCHANGES TO PROVIDE ACCESS A. Baker Road Area 1. Existing situation /No build - No access at Baker Road, no change at Clearwater, and no change at CSAH 62/I -494. 2. No access at Baker Road /I -494, interchange at Clearwater /CSAH 62, improve CSAH 62/I -494 interchange. 3. Interchange at Baker Road /I -494 (alternatives discussed below). No change at Clearwater Drive /CSAH 62, and no change at CSAH 62/ 1-494. a. Existing situation /No build - No access to I -494. b. Modified diamond interchange - Existing Baker Road alignment. c. Diamond interchange - Existing Baker Road alignment. d. Diamond interchange - Baker Road realignment east of I -494 on the C &NW railroad ROW. e. Half- diamond interchange - Baker Road realigned on the C &NW railroad ROW. f. Split- diamond interchange between the existing Baker Road alignment and the C &NW railroad alignment. 4. Interchange at Baker Road /I -494 (alternatives discussed above), reduce the emphasis on access at Clearwater Drive /CSAH 62 (close median, overpass with no access, etc.). 5. Combination of improvements described in both Alternatives 2 and 3. B. Area Between Nicollet and TH 77 1. Existing situation /No build 2. Full diamonds at Nicollet and Portland, remove access at 12th. Provide additional overpasses as necessary. 3. Full diamond at Portland, remove access at Nicollet and 12th. Provide additional overpasses as necessary. IV. FRONTAGE ROADS /DETACHED FRONTAGE ROADS /PARALLEL ARTERIALS A. CSAH 62 to TH 169 1. Existing situation /No build. B. TH 169 to TH 100 1. South side a. Existing situation - 78th between West Bush Lake Road and TH 169, none between East and West Bush Lake Roads, Green Valley Road between East Bush take Road and TH 100. b. Add frontage road between East and West Bush Lake Roads. 2. North side a. Existing situation - Edina Drive /78th b. Connect 78th with the existing frontage road on the east side of CSAH 18. c. Connect 78th to Viking Drive across CSAH 18. C. TH 100 to Xerxes 1. South side a. Existing situation - 79th /80th 2. North side a. Existing situation - 76th /77th D. Xerxes to I -35W 1. South side a. Existing situation - 80th b. Two -way 80th and one -way Southtown Drive 2. North side a. Existing situation - 78th b. 76th Street. c. 76th between Penn and I -35W and 78th between Xerxes and Penn. _ d. Two -way 76th and one -way 78th between Xerxes and Penn. E. I -35W to TH 77 1. South side a. Existing situation - 79th /80th b. Construct bridges at TH 77 and I -35W 2. North side a. Existing situation - 76th /77th b. 77th Street VII. B. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian SUBJECT: Revocation of the Food Establishment License for Swensens Ice Cream, 127 Southdale Center DATE: April 29, 1987 On April 16, 1987 the Health Department inspected Swensen Ice Cream restaurant at 127 Southdale Center. The restaurant received a score of 44. A passing score is 70 or higher based on a maximum score of 100. This was the fifth inspection conducted at Swensens Ice Cream since Mohammed and Fatima E1 Gamal began operating the establishment in March of 1986. The E1 Gamal's have not passed a food establishment inspection during this period of time. The Health Department performs two initial inspections each year on a licensed food establishment. The initial inspection is followed by at least one compliance inspection. Since May of 1986 the Department has performed three initial inspections and two compliance inspections at Swensens Ice Cream. On September 16, 1987 an inspection found a refrigeration unit which was being used that was not operating properly. an order was issued to not use this refrigeration unit until it had been repaired or replaced. On October 6, 1987 a court citation was issued to them because they were using this refrigeration unit even though it was not operating properly. Since October 6, 1986, this violation has been identified on three subsequent inspections. Proper refrigeration of food items is a critical control procedure in the prevention of foodborne illness. The Health Department is very concerned about food safety in Swensens Ice Cream Restaurant. In addition, the following violations have been repeatedly identified during initial inspections and compliance inspections: 1. Four inspections found food thermometers were not available for food preparation personnel to check food temperatures. L 2. Five inspections found food contact surfaces were not clean and sanitary. 3. Five inspections found hand soap or towels missing at one or more of the handwash sinks. 4. Five inspections found dirty floors, walls and ceilings. 5. Five inspections found poisonous substances such as cleaning chemicals improperly stored adjacent to food items or not properly identified by a label. The five inspection scores at Swensens Ice Cream Restaurant since May 1986 are as follows: May 29, 1986 - 52 July 18, 1986 - 68 December 11, 1986 - 65 December 29, 1986 - 66 April 16, 1986 - 44 The Health Department is seeking revocation of Swensens Ice Cream food establishment license based on the fact that there have been repetitive violations at the restaurant and the restaurant has not passed the minimum inspection rating of 70 for the five most recent inspections. The Health Department has advised Swensens Corporate Office of this pending action. Swensens Corporation has indicated to us that they will not intervene on behalf of their franchisee. Mohammed and Fatima E1 Gamal were advised on April 17, 1987 that the Health Department will be asking the Edina City Council to revoke their food establishment license at the City Council meeting on Monday May 4, 1987. CITY OF JR��- �A��� .'01 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 April 17, 1987 Mohamad and Fatima E1 Gamal Swensons Ice Cream 127 Southdale Center Edina, Minnesota 55435 Dear Mohamad and Fatima El Gamal: You are hereby notified that I will be submitting a recommendation to the Edina Council that your food establishment license should be revoked for failure to comply with the minimum requirements of the Edina Food Establishment Ordinance. This recommendation is a result of your failure to act in good faith to resolve the numerous food handling violations found during inspections conducted on May 20, 1986, December 11, 1986 and April 16, 1987. It is in my opinion that the food handling practices employed by your food establishment present a potential hazard for the public who purchase and consume food from your place of business. The Edina Health Department has attempted to resolve these issues through cooperative efforts which failed and resulted in our initiating legal actions to gain compliance. The legal actions also failed which leaves the Health Department with the only alternative of seeking license revocation. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, May 4, 1987, in the Council Chamber at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota. You may be present with legal counsel to show cause why your food establishment license should not be revoked. Sincerely, David A. Velde Edina Health Department DAV /jh Mavor COUrtnev L11C: Program Planning Committee Government Affairs Committee Mayors Cable Program Cable Commission Chair M1M: Government Affairs Committee Special Appearances Fred Richards City School Liaison Edinborough Development Liaison Hedberg Property Liaison Municipal Legislative Commission Park Board Human Relations Commission Personnel (City Manager) Evaluation Committee Building Construction Appeals Board COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES Leslie Turner Liaison to Community Devel- opment & Planning Comm.. Board Member of SHHSC Personnel Committee Chair Council representative to I -494 Corridor Study Council representative to guide Strategic Planning process Centennial Commission Member AMM Board Member; Chair of AMM Housing Committee Member of Metropolitan Task Force re: Effects of Baby Boom on Housing Mkt Co -Chair of Edina School Board's Community Services Task Force Oversee open appointments process Peggy Kelly Art Center Community Health Services Advisory Commission AMM Revenue Committee Centennial Commission Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) VII.E. Edina Recycling Commission Edina Heritage Preservation' Board Board of Appeals & Adjustments Citizens Committee for Braemar Sports Complex VII.F. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland FROM: Bob Kojetin and Gordon Hughes SUBJECT: GOOSE CONTROL PROGRAM DATE: May 1, 1987 We have reported to the City Council on past occasions concerning possible control measures for Canada geese. In other cities, these control measures have focused primarily on the capture of geese during their flightless stage in mid summer, and then subsequent translocation to other parts of the country. These efforts have been coordinated by Dr. James Cooper of the University of Minnesota. A copy of a recent study concerning his efforts is attached. We have met recently with Dr. Cooper who has outlined a three -year program of translocation. The annual cost of the program would be $3,266. We have also received interest by some residents of the City to contribute to the program to defray our costs. The first step of the program is to hold a public hearing. This hearing would be conducted by Dr. Cooper and representatives of the Department of Natural Resources and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (The hearing would be conducted at City Hall but the Council need not attend.) We suggest that this hearing be conducted on May 13th. We would then place the item on the May 18th Council agenda for final consideration. Anyone wishing to address the Council would do so on May 18th. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Council authorize the May 13th hearing. BK, GH /sw Attached THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRANSLOCATION CONTROL OF MINNEAPOLIS -ST. PAUL CANADA GOOSE POPULATIONS James A. Cooper, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife University of Minnesota. St. Paul MN 55108 Extirpated by market and subsistence hunting over much of its southern breeding range during settlement, the Canada goose (Branta canadensis) has been reestablished in the midwestern and eastern United States and Canada. This successful wildlife restoration resulted from federal, provincial, state, and private programs (Nelson 1963, Dill and Lee 1970, Cooper 1978). Canada goose release in urban - suburban environments began in the 1950s; a decade later, the species was breeding in Denver, Minneapolis -St. Paul, Detroit, Toronto, Wilmington, and the suburbans of Boston, and several New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut communties (Hawkins 1970). Although noting nuisance goose complaints, Hawkins (1970) concluded that the bird's aesthetic qualities outweighed the nuisance aspect, and, that with enlightened management, difficulties could be minimized. However, metropolitan Canada goose populations and nuisance complaints have grown at phenomenal rates (Laycock 1982, Oetting 1983). For example, Hawkins (1970) estimated the Metropolitan Twin Cities population at 448 birds in 1968; currently I estimate this population at 10,000- 12,000 birds. Complaints of goose droppings on golf course greens and fairways, docks and swimming beaches, and lawns are frequent and r 2 widespread. In addition, locally breeding geese use the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport area and have become a serious aircraft hazard. Five Twin Cities' communities, the Federal Aviation Administration, and Metropolitan Airport Commission are currently funding population reduction research programs and at least six other communties are considering population control. Capture and transportation of flightless Canada geese to a distant site (translocation) has been used to control nuisance urban populations in Massachusetts, New York, Michigan, Ontario, and elsewhere. Published reports on this procedure suggest that it is effective with few birds returning to the capture sites (Martz et al. 1983, Converse 1985). This paper presents the results of research in the Twin Cities of Minnesota that indicate translocation effectiveness may be significantly lower and discusses translocation limitations. METHODS Flightless adults and goslings were drive - trapped in June and early July in 1982, 1984, 1985, and 1986 and transported elsewhere by truck. Adult and 1984 immature birds were legbanded and released in Oklahoma; other young geese were transported to Minnesota sites. Oklahoma was selected as a release area because, based on 2;000+ band recoveries from 1974 to, 1981, Twin Cities Canada geese did not winter in or migrate through Oklahoma. Rates of translocated bird return to the capture sites were determined by reading legbands in spring and fall each year with spotting scopes, and from drive -trap recaptures. Breeding females in 1985 and 1986 were identified by the presence of brood patchs (Hanson 1959) . 3 In an attempt to reduce adult return to Minnesota, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation clipped 1 -2 inches (2.5 -5.0 cm) from the distal three or four primaries on one wing and pulled the primaries on the other wing in 1985. The 121 geese treated in this manner had been previously translocated. By pulling primaries, flight was delayed by 1 month (mid- August) and by clipping primaries, the birds had an imbalance in wing lift. The latter was presumed to be sufficient to prevent migration. RESULTS Flightless adult and young geese were drive - trapped at and translocated from one, two, six and six Twin Cities' communities in 1982, 1984, 1985, and 1986, respectively. The 15 capture sites included six suburban lakes, six park- nature center lakes, two golf courses, and one corporate headquarters pond complex. Two hundred sixty -one adults and 195 goslings were removed in 1982, 530 and 480 in 1984, 375 and 486 in 1985, and 198 and 309 in 1986 (Table 1). One hundred ninety -five immatures were translocated to Carver Park Reserve (20 miles [32 km] SW of the trap site) in 1982, 424 sent to Oklahoma in 1984, and 798 were released at Minnesota sites 50+ miles (80+ km) from the capture site in 1985 and 1986. Legbands were placed on 256, 200, and 489 young in 1984, 1985, and 1986, respectively. After the 1982 translocation, the Minneapolis population decresed 55% (505 to 225) in 1983, and gosling production declined 43% (193 to 110). Based on legband readings from females with broods, 18 of 29 (62 %) of the breeding females were translocated geese. This population recovered to 1982 levels by 1984 with 4 Table 1. Canada goose translocations from the Twin Cities of Minnesota and released or uncaptured geese,1982, 1984 -86. Location Translocated Brood patch Not year Adult Immature Total females captured Edina 1985 20 6 26 3 3 1986 3 8 11 2 3 Golden Valley 1984 157 288 445 33 6 1985 81 155 236 36 0 1986 46 89 135 23 0 New Brighton 1985 38 68 106 13 0 1986 19 36 55 8 0 Minneapolis 1982 261 195 456 __ 50a 1984 373 192 565 55 11a 1985 170 116 286 51 14a 1986 58 60 118 25 20a Plymouth 1985 22 43 65 10 0 1986 51 100 151 21 6 Richfield 1985 44 98 142 18 17 1986 21 16 37 9 3 Total 1,364 1,470 2,834 307 133 a Released at capture site. 5 Table 2. Twin Cities recapture and observation of 1,616 banded Canada geese translocated from the Twin Cities to Minnesota and Oklahoma sites, 1982, 1984 -85. Number banded First observed in 1983 First observed in 1984 First observed in 1985 First observed in 1986 Total Percentage 1982 1984 1985 Total Adult Immature Adult Immature Adult Immature Return 261 195 447 256 257 200 18 5 23 12 3 15 0 72 1 0 76 4 81 2 0 25 0 72 0 99 33 8 101 4 72 0 218 13 4 23 2 28 0 13 6 373 adults and 192 goslings captured (Table 1). After 1984 removals, the Minneapolis population declined by 49% (565 to 286) and production was 40% lower (192 to 116). In 1985, 170 adult geese were captured in Minneapolis, 46'/0 fewer than in 1984, and in 1986, 58 were caught, a decline of 66% from 1985. Overall, Minneapolis removals resulted in a 90% drop in adults and a 69% decrease in young produced from 1984 to 1986. At the other sites, adult decline in the first year after translocation was 38 %, and reproduction was 37% lower. Second year translocation decreases were 43% for Golden Valley adults and 43% for production. Overall, Golden Valley adults declined 70% and reproduction 69% after two years of removal. Oklahoma translocated adult geese returned to the capture sites at a significantly (P <0.05) higher rate than immatures released in Minnesota or in Oklahoma. Eight of 195 (4 %) immatures translocated to Carver Park, none of the 1985 Minnesota released young, and four of 256 (2 %) of the Oklahoma released immatures returned to the capture sites. In contrast, 33 (13 %), 101 (23 %), and 72 (28 %) of translocated adults returned (Table 2). The clipping of the outer primaries on one wing did not significantly (P >0.05) reduce adult return rates. Thirty -three of 121 (27 %) of these birds returned in 1986. Based on brood patch data from 1985 and 1986 recaptures, returning translocated geese made up a high proportion of the breeding populations. In 1985, 43 of 87 (49 %) brood patch females captured were translocated geese; the proportion was 47 of 88 (53 %) in 1986. Seventy -six percent of the 1986 Minneapolis brood patch females were Oklahoma translocated geese. DISCUSSION The results of this study demonstrate that translocation can reduce nuisance populations of Canada geese in urban - suburban communities. Breeding populations were 40 -50% and 70 -90% lower, and reproduction reduced by 30 -40% and 60 -70% after land 2 years of removal, respectively. Without the high (12 -28 %) return of translocated adults, particularly breeding females, the effectiveness of the techniques would have been far greater. Translocated adult females constituted 500% of the breeding females in 1985 and 1986. Moreover, the rate of translocated bird return rose with time (Table 2), suggesting that additional adult translocations to the same area will be less effective. In contrast, young birds can be moved very short (20 miles or 32 km) distances from the capture site without significant returns. My findings differ from Converse's (1985). She reported fewer than 3% of the legbanded Canada geese translocated as far north as Maine and as far south as Georgia returned to her southeastern New York - southwestern Connecticut study area. These birds, unlike the Minnesota populations, were non - migratory and it may be that Canada geese that migrate have a much higher likelihood of returning to the capture sites. Control of urban - suburban Canada goose populations is expensive (Martz et al. 1983) and in Minnesota costs are paid primarily from local government funds. In addition, goose control is highly visible with frequent media coverage and controversy. The birds are easily counted, thus population reduction projections must be accurate or program creditability is diminished. Thus it is critical that population reduction projections be based on a realistic estimate of translocation bird return. Ultimately, translocation will be self - limiting as states and provinces willing to accept translocated geese meet their goose restoration goals. Long -term urban goose population reductions will have to be based on other techniques. These include reproduction reduction by physical or chemical means, increased mortality via additional hunting where possible, and perhaps trapping and slaughter for human consumption. Acknowledgments. -- Funding for this research was provided by the University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station, the Cities of Minneapolis, Golden Valley, and New Brighton, General Mills Corporation, the Federal Aviation Administration, and Metropolitan Airports Commission. I thank the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture for coordinating permits and assistance with capture and translocation. Many people contributed to this project. I thank Tim Anderson and Arlis Olson, Metropolitan Airports Commission, and Oren Burckhardt and Les Case, Federal Aviation Administration for their coordination of funding and access to the airport facilities. Nancy Burgstahler and Mary Mitchell, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Richard Wetzel, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Roger Johnson, Lloyd Knudson, Jon Parker, Tim Wallace, and others with Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Jontie Aldrich and other Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation personnel provided invaluable assistance. Mari Smaby, Wayne Winkleman, Terry Birkenstock, Lori Hawkins, Tom Roster, Judi Mikolai, Caroline Yineman, and Mike Palanuk, University of Minnesota, assisted with banding, population surveys, translocation, and data processing. REFERENCES CITED Converse, K. A. 1985. A study of resident nuisance Canada geese in Connecticut and New York. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Mass., Amherst. 84pp. Cooper, J.A. 1978. The history and breeding biology of the Canada geese of Marshy Point, Manitoba. Wildl. Monogr. 61. 87pp. Di III H.H. and F.B. Lee, eds. 1970. Home grown honkers. U. S. Dep. Inter., Fish and Wild[. Serv., Washington, D. C. 154pp. Hanson, H. C. 1959. The incubation patch of wild geese: its recognition and significance. Arctic 12:139 -150. Hawkins, A.S. 1970. Honkers move to the city. Pages 120 -130 in H.H.Dill and F.B. Lee, eds. Home grown honkers. , U. S. Dep. Inter., Fish and, Wildl. Serv.,Washington, D. C. Laycock, G. 1982. The urban goose. Audubon 84:44 -47. Martz, J., L. Pospichal, and E. Tucker. 1983. Giant Canada geese in Michigan: experiences with trans[ocations and nuisance management. Page 57 -59 in M.A. Johnson ed. Transactions of the Canada goose symposium. North Dakota Chapter of The Wildlife Society. Nelson, H.K. 1963. Restoration of breeding Canada goose flocks in the North Central States. Trans. North. Am. Wildl. and Nat. Resour.Conf. 28:133 -150. Oetting, R. 1983. Overview of management of Canada geese and their recent urbanization. Page 52 in M.A. Johnson ed. Transactions of the Canada goose symposium. North Dakota Chapter of The Wildlife Society. 600 z O_ 500 H J 400 a0 300 CL w 200 z 100 0 z O H 400 Q J M 300 a O CL 200 w z 100 A MINNEAPOLIS 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 GOLDEN VALLEY 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 YEAR _O a J a O a F- Z W U W CL 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 MINNEAPOLIS G. VALLEY 70 47 49 79 FIRST SECOND 90 YEARS OF REMOVAL THIRD 94 Salaries (program coordination and monitoring) Shipping and Travel Miscellaneous (boots, field forms, computer disks) Budget: 1987 1988 2,500 2,500 700 700 1989 1990 2,500 2,500 700 700 .- M. TOTAL 3,266 3,266 3,266 3,266 (Orriciai Pubiicacion) CITY OF EDINA X.A. 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council.of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will meet on May 4, 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue its general obligation tax increment refunding bonds (the Refunding Bonds), in order to.refund in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,.dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000 (the Series 1985 Bonds). The maximum aggregate principal amount of the Refunding Bonds is $13,200,000. The Prior Bonds were used to finance public redevelopment costs incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City .(the HRA) in connection with the Edinborough Development presently being constructed in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area. The Edinborough Development is generally located in the extreme southeast corner of the corporate limits of the City._ The Edinborough Development is a mixed use development containing _ • commercial office building, a condominium housing project, • multifamily elderly rental housing facility, and a public park and other public amenities. The initial owner of the commercial office building is Edinborough Office East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; the initial owner of the condominium housing project is the Edinborough Condominium Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership; the initial owner of the multifamily rental housing facility is Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; and the initial owner of the public park and other public amenities is the HRA. The principal of and.interest on the Refunding Bonds are expected to be paid from tax increments to be derived from the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area, but if necessary for the payment of such principal and interest, ad valorem taxes will be required to be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set forth above. Dated: April 15, 1987. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL By /s /Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 4, 1987 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Tape Recordings During January 1987, in the course of enforcing traffic law, the issue of the propriety of an officer tape- recording conversations with violators has become a matter of discussion. And, one person involved in such a recording has asked the City to identify its position on the matter. The facts surrounding the.January incident include: - The stopping of a car on Interlachen Blvd. for a speed limit violation. - Conversations (tape - recorded) between the violator and the officer, unknown to the violator. - The issuance of a citation. - Continued conversation with criticism directed toward the officer by the violator. - A complaint of the officer's action to the Police Captain by the violator. -,An investigation by the Captain that included discovery of the tape recording which exonerated the officer's actions. - A report to the complaining violator of the existence of the tape recording and the findings of the investigation. - Continuing complaints about the practice of tape recording to the Police Department and the City Prosecutor. In this case, the issue has moved from the violation,of speed law to the practice of tape recording conversations of violators. The officer involved has used the tape recording technique for several years. He has historically been the most active officer on the Department and deals with thousands of violators annually. During the course of any enforcement action, confrontation and criticism of the officer's action may occur. Occasionally these criticisms become complaints against the officer and are investigated. This officer has chosen to make these recordings to protect himself from unfounded complaints. The issues of the recording must be put into its proper perspective. It is not intended as a part of the evidence - gathering process. It is viewed as an administrative safeguard by the officer. Several other officers in the Memorandum — Tape Recordings Page 2 May 4, 1987 metropolitan area utilize the same technique. However, no police agencies require their use nor prohibit the practice. In February 1987, Attorney Marsh Halberg, the City Prosecutor, commented that the practice was not illegal and was a common practice in the law enforcement community. On May 1, 1987, Attorney Stephen Lucke of the City Attorney's Office indicated the use of the tape recorder is a legal activity with no legal objections to the practice. I understand the feelings of the complainant in this matter. I'm sure none of us appreciate not being in control of a situation, notwithstanding being tape recorded in the process. However, the officer's vulnerability is also a consideration. Officers are accused of arrogance, lying, using profanity, and racial and ethnic slurs during such events. In this case, the officer has used a legal practice to protect himself from such complaints. Given the above facts and discussion, I recommend that the City take no action on the matter. The unstated policy of the Police Department has been to neither encourage nor prohibit the use of tape recorders by officers and I would recommend the continuance of that policy. The use of recordings has been in the administrative area and should they be considered for introduction into criminal proceedings, all legal requirements will be met. If you have further questions, please contact me. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah - - - M- ESSERLI & KRA-M E R- WILLIAM F..MESSERLI- ATTORNEYS AT LAW - - ROSS E. KRAMER - DAVID R. KRACUM - 1500 NORTHLAND PLAZA BUILDING MARK S. LARSON - TIMOTHY J. BAUER, - - 3.800 WEST 80TH STREET.. REBECCA.H. FREDERICK MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431-4409 ROBERT G. RENNER, JR. - SANDRA L. NEREN - '(612) 893 -6650 RANDOLPH W. MORRIS - THOMAS M. REGAN PAUL M. BEGICH - - - CHRISTOPHER B. HUNT -, LAURIE P. HUUSKO 'JAMES C. WICKA - DIANE A. KOTULA _ ERIC A. SHORT MICHAEL D. PEDERSON - DATE: APRIL 30, 1987 TO: MLC Operating Committee FROM: Bob Renner, Jr. RE: School Aids Bill Please find enclosed a copy of the House School Aids bill which passed the House floor on Thursday, April 30, 1987. This computer run is up to date and includes all the provisions in the House bill. Since the Association of Metropolitan School Districts prepared.this computer print out, not all MLC cities may be included. As you can see, the average suburban school district will be required to levy 17.8 percent more property tax dollars and will receive only 3.2 percent more revenue. 2,585{ 25.79 oillsl ED�42695 HOUSE FMM71ON AND RETIREPOIT REVEM E PER OLD 001 3 YEAR 1 - 198647 CURRENT STATUTES- 1 1987 -68 HOUSE PRA 1 1988-89 HOUSE PROPOSAL I FMM/ I FMMD/ -PEI fT DPME IN--- I FMW/ TOTAL -PERCM DPEE I*-, I RETIRE STATE I RETIRE STATE TOTAL STATE I RETIRE AID LEVY TOTAL STATE ISTRICT 1 REVERE AID LEVY I REVERE AID LEVY REVEL g AID LEVY I REVEKE PER MD3 PER UAIM REVENLE AID LEVY 1 1 a -Dml? "oTON 13 ROOKLYN CENTER 6 JRNSVILLE tow COLIAEIA HEI6'1TTS WIMA PIDLEY 1j;VINGS tt1PKINS JMR GROYE -PINE mWM;4EDi MINNET010W MIM VIEW /JJRTH ST. PAUL -N 0 ,I / M FIELD AMIMSDALE KISEVILLE $ aINT ANTHONY SAINT LOUIS PARK Swam S xlTH ST. PAIL SUM IfA6HINGTOd STRING LAKE P M STILLUATER V41YZATA fA m ST. PAIL V(ESTONMA tAITE BEAR LAKE 1 2,742 1 2,838 1 2,539 1 2,457 1 2,739 1 2,737 517 1,121 1,228 1,415 1,258 359 2,226 1 19789. 1 1,319 1 1,042 1 1,481 1 2,387 1 . 29797 2,834 2,639 2,537 2,817 2,786 594 19181 10228 11439 1,2®6 389 2,213 19653 19411 1,598 1,611 2,406 2.0% 0.2% 3.9% 3.3% 2.9% 1.8% 118% 5.4% 0.7% 1.7% -4.1% 8.6% -9.6% 1 -13% 1 7.8% I 5.3% 1 8.8% 1 9.8% 1 1,960 1,926 1,728 1,613 4918 2,895 291 1, m 1,164 19395 1,537 0 2,609 1,845 1,564 1,216 1,881 3,439 3.7% 3.2% 3.4% 3.9%- 3.6% 3.9% -W. 2% -8.5% -5.3% -3.0% -14.1% - 109.0% 17.97 11.61 18.9' 15.83 16.8r 42.51 1 2,592 1,289 1,384 1 2,662 1,337 19326 2.7% 3.7% 1.7% 1 2,148 19249 1,499 3.2% " -6.6% 13.11 1 2,431 19559 873 1 2,549 1,604 945 4.8% 2.9% 8.3% 1 2,627 1,575 1,051 3.0% -1.ai 11.2'1 1 2,844 351 1,494 1 2,885 381 2,594 1.4% 8.6% 0.4% 1 1,946 0 3,466 2.1% -1M.9% 38.4. 1 1,463 1,516 949 1 2,579 1,548 1,®22 4.3% 2.1% 7.7% 1 1,646 1,487 1,158 3.9%. -3.9% 13.4 1 44% 1,172 1,318 1 2,562 I'M 1, 271 2.9% 18.2% -3.6% 1 2,60 1, 268 1,312 3.9% -1.8% & M 1 2,685 861 19744 1 2,682 898 1,784 2.9% 4.3% 2 3% 1 1,776 729 2,047 3.5% -18.8% 14.8. 1 2,579 1,028 1,541 1 2,636 1,965 1,571 2.6% 3.6% 1.9% 1 2,726 936 11741 3.4% -7.4% IL B; I 1,608 11133 1,475 1 2,692 11188 1,512 3.2% 4.2% 2.5% 1 21784 19118 19667 3.4% -5.3% 1L?,' 1 2,677 748 1,929 1 21129 816 1,913 1.9% 9.1% -9.8% 1 2,826 6N 2,M 3.6% -24.0% 15.3, I 2,719 611 2,179 1 2,842 662 2,180 1.9% 8.4% 0.0% 1. 2,948 393 2,5M 3.7% -0.6% 17.25 1 21727 1,169 1,558 I 2,822 1,202 11620. 3.5% 2.9% 4.0% 1 49M 190M 1,876 3.7% -12.2% 15.41' 1 2,773 572 2,201, 1 4818 560 2,251 1.6% -2.8% 1.6% 1 21878 248 21630 2.1% -.7x 16.5, 1 4836 373 21463 1 2,877 481 21396 1.4% 28.8% -2.7% 1 2,936 187 21749 2.1% -61.1% 14.15 I 2,986 483 21581 1 3,918 436 2,583 1.1% 7.5% 0.1% 1 3,083 0 31697 1.2% -IN. 0% 39.71 1 21481 1,246 19232 1 29580 19215 1,365 4.0% -2.6% 19.7% 1 21659 19148 11511 3.1% J15% 10.7r 1 2,648 11481 11238 1 2,716 11447 1,269 2.9% 3.3% 2.4% 1 21899 11493 19406 3.4% -3.1% 19.81 1 2,480 11649 849 1 21593 1,720 873 4.6% 4.9% 4.0% 1 2,676 1,714 963 3.2% -0.3% IL b 1 21524 1,310 11214 1 29590 1,379 1,211 2.6% 5.2% -0.2% 1 2,670 1,314 19356 3.1% -4.7% 12.0 1 1,533 1,347 11187 1 29631 1,393 19237 3.9% 3.6% 4.2% 1 2,719 19365 19354 3.3% -2.1% 9.51 1 295% 596 1,994 1 21643 578 21665 2.1% -3.0% 3.6% 1 2,735 482 2,332 3.5% 7-39.4% 12.9x 1 29568 312 2,256 1 4664 343 2,322 3.7% 9.7% 2.9% 1 2,756 9 21832 3.4% - 168.8% 22.8•:1 1 2,675 835 19849 1 2,742 993 1,839 2.5% 8.1% 0.9% 1 2,838 756 2,081 3.5% - 16.2% 13.2. " - 1 21532 19469 1,983 1 - 29647 19469 11178 3.7% 9.9% 8.8% 1 2,736 11435 19382 3.4% -2.3% 19.5% ASD AVER 1 2,637 994 11643 1. 21709 . 1,032• " 1,677 2.7% 3.8% 2.1% 1 4795 877 19976 3.2% -15.1% 17. e% NOTEi Foundation/Reti, nt Revenue Columns do NOT include Suer School funds. MCMTnTTM M WTanM TTAN q Vlxy.. DTRTRTrT5 r senate Pr erty Sax Plan Highlights Reduces the number of property classes from 68 to 9 to make the property tax system easier to understand and less costly to administer ° Removes incentives in the state's property tax system for local government c`ticia!s to increase spending, and increases the predictability of property tax relief programs by limiting state reimbursement fcrthe homestead credit and school agriculture credit -- which increase with increased local govemment spending -- to a fixed percentage increase ° bolds down property tax increases by limiting the amount of increase in property taxes by towns, cities and counties to no more than three percent for property taxes to be paid in 1988 ° Increases state aid to counties which have a property tax of more than one -half mill for public assistance income maintenance programs m Increases state aid to cities in areas experiencing rapid decline in property values due to depressed economic conditions ° Reduces the comparatively high property tax burden on the owners of commercial - industrial property ° Retains the property tax refund program for both renters and homeowners ° Makes the property tax refund program more progressive by providing larger property tax refunds for households with dependents in comparison with households with no dependents Liescri pion ®f Senate Property `fax Plan Property Tax Disparity Bids to Counties This is a new aid program aimed at reducing the property tax burden of property owners residing in distressed counties which levy more than one -half mill for public assistance maintenance programs, including general assistance. The aid would equal up to 95 percent of the counties' cost of the program exceeding an amount Equivalent to one -half mill. The c^st of the program for 1988 is estimated at about $13 million. Property Tax Disparity Aids to Cities The Senate plan provides increases in local government aids to all cities and towns. In addition, cities and towns in economically depressed areas that are experiencing rapidly declining property values would receive substantial increases in state aids in order to reduce their high tax rates. Homestead Credit and School Agricultural Credit Aid The Senate plan changes the homestead credit and school agricultural credit from a credit program tied to fluctuations in property tax bills to a state aid program financed by a fixed appropriation in the state budget. Local units of government wou!d continue to receive a payment from the state equal to the amount of homestead credit and school agricultural credit they now receive. As a result, local governments would not have to raise added property taxes caused by the change in the programs from a credit to a state aid. The owners of homes and farms would have a portion of their property's value exempt from property taxes. The exemption would be equivalent to the amount of reduction in their property tax bills resulting from the homestead credit and/or school agricultural credit. The exemption would be 52 percent of the first $68,000 of the home's value. Therefore, property owners would end up paying the same amount of tax as they now pay under current law. Aids to Local Governments for Reclassification of Properties The Senate proposes reducing the number of property classes from 68 to nine. Any local unit of government experiencing a reduction in its property values caused by the plan would receive additional state aids to compenstats for any tax loss resulting from the changes. This would result in property owners not having to pay additional taxes to make up for a reduction in other property owners' values because of the plan. a I Levy Limits for Cities and Counties The plan would limit property tax increases by cities, towns and counties for 1988 only to no more than a 3 percent increase over the amount of property taxes and state aid the kcal unit of government received in 1987. Local units of government receiving increases in state aids in 1988 would have to offset the amount of the limit for any increase they received in state aid. This limit is being put in place for one year only because of the far - reaching changes that would be made to the state's property tax system under the Senate plan. The levy limits for cities would not apply to the amount they levy'to repay debts. For counties, the limits would not apply to the amount they levy to pay for the cost off public income maintenance and public assistance programs for the needy. The counties' levy to pay for the cost of social service programs would be limited to increases in their caseloads plus the rate of inflation. Simplifying the Classificati ®n of Property in Minnesota The Current Classes: nm e homestead dwelling unit in building owned by cooperative or charity non - agricultural homestead of blind or disabled persons homestead dwelling unit of blind or disabled persons in building owned by cooperative or charity residential property with fewer than 4 units when entitled to homestead for at least one unit (homestead) percentage of market value taxed first $65,000 at 18 %, amount over $65,000 at 2810 first $32,500 at 5 %, next $32,500 at 18 %, amount over $65,000 at 28% first $32,500 at 5O1o, next $32,500 at 18p1o, amount over $65,000 at 28% first $65,000 at 18 %, amount over $65,000 at 28% residential property of blind or disabled first $32,500 at 5 %, next person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount entitled to homestead for unit occupied over $65,000 at 28% by blind or disabled person (homestead) residential property with fewer than 4 first $65,000 at 18 %, amount units when entitled to homestead for at over $65,000 at 28% entitled to"homestead for at least one unit (non- homestead) residential property of blind or disabled first $32,500 at 5 %, next person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount entitled to homestead occuped by blind over $65,000 at 28% or disabled person (nonhomestead) The Proposed Class: Residential Ilontestead: 40% up to $60,000, 62% above (60% in 1989) { The Current Classes: prnpErty agricultural homestead (family farmland) agricultural homestead of blind or disabled persons (family farmland) agricultural land and buildings used for purposes of homestead and farmed by person holding vested remainder interest (family farrland) agricultural homestead (homestead use) agricultural homestead of blind or disabled persons (homestead) agricultural land and buildings used for used for purposes of homestead and farmed by person holding vested remainder interest (homestead) percentage of market value taxed first $65,00 at 14 %, amount over $65,000 at 18% first $32,500 at 5 %, next $32,500 at 14 %, amount over $65,000 at 28p7o first $65,000 at 14 %, over $65,000 at 18% first $65,000 at 14 %, amount over $65,000 at 18% first $32,500 at 5 %, next $32,500 at 14 %, amount over $65,000 at 28% first $65,000 at 14%, second $65,000 at 18% The Proposed Class: Farm Homestead: 30% of value to $64,000,40% above The Current Classes r�Perty agricultural land, non- homestead rural land used exclusively for growing timber non - agricultural homestead percentage of market value taxed 18% 18% first $65,000 at 18 %, amount over $65,000 at 28% The Proposed Class: Farm Non - Homestead: 40% The Current CI -asses: PrPe-M commercial and industrial property employment property in a border city employment property in an enterprise zone ercenta eeof market value taxed first $60,000 at 28 %, amount over $60,000 at 43% first $50,000 at 28 %, amount over $50,000 at 38 1/2% first $50,000 at 20 %, amount over $50,000 at 21 1/2% The Proposed Class: Commercial /Industrial: 62% to$80,000, 96% above; 60% up to $80,000 and 90% above in 1989 The Current Classes: p-opert X apartment buildings of type I and type 11 construction of at least 5 stories residential, non - homestead property with 4 or more units hospitals licensed under M.S. 144.40 to 144.56, other than exempt hospitals, and contiguous property used for hospital purposes percentage of market value taxed building at 25 %, land at 34% 34'0 34% The Proposed Class: Market Rate Dental Property, 4 or more units: 76 % (70% in 1989) The Ctnrreant Classes: ro ,e non - profit community service oriented organization property not used for commercial purposes residential property with fewer than 4 units when entitled to homestead for at least one unit (homestead) percentage of market value taxed 21% first $65,000 at 18 %, amount over $65,000 at 28% residential property of blind or disabled firsr$32,500 at 5 %, next person with fewer than 4 units when $32,500 at 18 %, amount entitled to homestead for unit occupied over $65,000 at 28% by blind or disabled person (homestead) residential property with fewer than 4 units when entitled to homestead for at entitled to homestead for at least one unit (non - homestead) residence on non - homestead agricultural land residential, non - homestead property with 3 or fewer units first $65,000 at 18%, amount over $65,000 at 28% 28% 28% post- secondary student housing owned by 28 % non -profit corporations and used exclusively by sororities or fraternities continuing care facilities with residency assessed in manner set agreements that enable residents to occupy for cooperatives and charities units after personal assets are exhausted manufactured homes not classified 28%v under any other provisions The Proposed Class: Market (date Rental Property, 3 or fearer units: 62% (60% in 1989) f .i'dy^ala +. a -�. r'.� <�r m... :a . mss•. . s �..n �. may, c Ems. 2 I _ — I I- The Current Classes: ro c seasonal residential - recreational, commercial use, including a homestead (homestead use) seasonal residential- recreational, non - commercial use percentage of market value taxed only for cabins and land in an area of 800' x 509 at 12% 21% seasonal residential- recreational, commer- 21% cial use not used for commercial purposes more than 200 days per year seasonal residential - recreational, commer- 21% cial use not used for commercial purposes more than 200 days per year Section 8 U.S. Housing Code housing building at 20% financed by private institution. land at 34% neighborhood real estate trust 20% low- income housing owned by non - profit building at 20 %, or limited dividend organization built before land at 34% Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by MHFA or NHA - low- income housing owned by non -profit portion of building occupied or limited dividend organization built after by low- income persons at Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by MHFA 20 %, land and rest of or NHA. building at 34% The Proposed Class: Seasonal /Subsidized Rental Property: 50% The Current Classes: Property seasonal residential - recreational, commercial use and including a homestead low- income housing owned by non - profit or limited dividend organizations built belt Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by FmHA. low- income housing owned by non - prout or limited dividend organization built after Jan. 1, 1984, and financed by FmHA. percentage of market value taxed only for cabins and land in an area of 800' x 500' at 12% building at 10 %, ire land at 34% portion of building occupied by low- income persons at 20 %, land and rest of building at 34% The Proposed Class: Small Seasonal /Subsidized Rental: 30% The Current Classes: rp onerty percentage of market vaine taxed unimproved land not used for 40% commercial or industrial activities vacant land 40% unmined iron ore 50% low -grade iron ore 30%-481/2% depending on quality fixed tools, machinery of a utility or 331/3% pipeline company all property not in any other class 43% s The Proposed Class: All Other Property: 100% Senate 4 Proaram s Individual Income Tax - Dramatically increases fairness and progressivity by: • broadening the base through elimination of special interest group preferences, deductions and loopholes • reducing state tax burden for nearly three - fourths of taxpayers by - dropping the rates to 6% and 8% - dropping 125,000 low income families from tax rolls • returning entire windfall gained by conforming to federal law ($660 million) to taxpayers - Simplifies by: • allowing two- thirds of taxpayers to use a five -line short form • reducing the long form from 30 to 18 lines • conforming to the federal tax law, lessening the complexity of multiple exemptions - Increases accountability and enforceability by making tax system easier for taxpayers to understand - Brings Minnesota's tax rates more in line with income tax rates of other states Sates Tax - Increases fairness by removing certain exemptions from the tax and thereby broadening the tax base Increases stability and predictability of state revenue Business Taxes - Increases fairness and stability by: • broadening the tax base • reducing the top corporate tax rate from 120/6 to 8.9% • adding minimum tax for large corporations not now paying • removing ability to carry back operating losses • extending motor fuels tax to railroads -Brings Minnesota's business tax rates more in line with other states Property Taxes -Substantially increases fairness by: • reducing the disparities in tax rates between counties and cities that result from differences in the wealth of property tax bases of communities or spending patterns caused by a downturn in economic conditions • reducing the property taxes for property owners now paying at high effective tax rates • adjusting the state's property tax refund program for homeowners and renters by providing larger property tax refunds to homeowners or renters who have dependents • retaining the renter's credit -Dramatically simplifies by reducing the number of classifications from 68 to 10 to make the property tax system easier to understand - Removes incentives in the state's property tax system for increasing spending by local government officials -Makes state spending for property tax relief programs more stable and predictable 6 y� Sf 1 � Senate Tax Plan for Fiscal Year 1988 -89 Revenue 1988 -89 millions Individual Income Tax $ -3.8 Corporate Income Tax 161.5 Telephone Gross Earnings Tax 118.2 Elimination of the Tobacco Tax Exemption for Prisons 0.8 Railroad and Barge Fuel Excise Tax 15.1 Sales Tax • Meals provided to employees 3.9 • Interstate telephone calls (except incoming WATS calls) 48.7 • Custom computer software 2.9 • State and local government purchases 127.0 • Railroad rolling stock 2.2 • Hospital cafeteria meals 14.1 • Nonprofit organization purchases 30.7 • Sales of Minnesota -bred horses 2.2 • Admission to public recreation areas 1.9 • Admission to nonprofit artistic performances 2.5 • Sales of boats 2.3 • Inclusion of federal taxes in price of item sold 4.2 • Motor vehicle purchases by units of government 14.9 • Non- prescription health and hygiene products 31.6 • Parking charges 7.2 • Health club charges 2.1 • Pet grooming services 1.0 • Detective and security services 2.6 • Building cleaning and maintenance services 17.1 • Car services (non- repair) 6.8 • Laundry and dry cleaning services (except coin - operated) 18.9 • Added sales tax due to cigarette tax increase 6.7 • Sales tax charged on gas -tax exempt gasoline purchases 0.8 • Elimination of sales tax on food -stamp purchases -1.2 • Reduction in sales tax rate on dealer- installed purchases -2.2 Insurance Gross Premiums Tax (except for nonprofit and fraternal organizations) 24.5 Deed and Mortgage Registration Taxes Value -based Tax on Liquor and Beer 27.0 11.6 $705.0 MINUTES OF THE.REGULAR MEETING EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, MARCH 24,_1987 AT :30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL MANAGERS CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Stuart, Tom Martinson, John Metil, Lois Wilder and David Gepner STAFF PRESENT: Harold Sand I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Martinson moved approval of the November 25, 1986 minutes as submitted. Mr. Metil seconded the motion. All voted aye motion carried., I.I. EDINA COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT ELMS: A. West 60th Street. Mr. Stuart explained the City Council approved a street reconstruction project that does not widen West 50th Street. The street will be striped for left turn lanes. The project also includes removal of the boulevard elm trees on the north side of the street under the power lines. The Heritage Preservation Board went on record previously that the trees should be preserved. Mr. Sand said that the project extends from Edina Court on the west to Halifax Avenue on the East and includes total reconstruction of the streets, sidewalks and underground utilities. The existing 40 foot street width will be preserved. The overhead power line will be buried within the right -of -way north of the sidewalk and the north sidewalk moved north two feet to provide a larger tree boulevard between the curb and sidewalk. The south sidewalk and boulevard elms will be preserved. The north side elms will be removed and replaced with a heavy planting of large caliper (4 to 6 inch ) trees of an undetermined species. Mr. Metil asked the rationale for sawing down perfectly good trees. Mr. Sand explained there was a concern that the -trees are susceptible to Dutch elm disease and may be lost in the future; that the trees were disfigured due to trimming over the years to clean the overhead power lines and that the root structure would be severely damaged due to excavation for the curb and storm sewer work on the south side and due to cutting for underground power and sidewalk construction on the north side, damaging the health of the trees and or leaving them susceptible to uprooting during wind storms. . Mr. Martinson said that there is a mentality in engineering departments - that typical construction standards must be followed and any time anything else including trees get in the way the recommendation is to get rid of them. Almost always then the people object, however, the engineering department keeps returning until the objection -dies down and they get their approvals. Removal of half the elms does not make sense because the point of elms is to make an arcade with similar trees on both sides - the.board asked.if the rationale for the 40 foot street .width was to preserve the trees. Mr. Sand responded that part of the rational was to preserve the trees; there also was a concern that,traffic volumes and speed may increase and the proximity would be a problem for.adjacent dwellings. The existing trees .are acclimated to the heavy traffic and salt conditions and that new trees may be difficult to establish. The new trees installed west of Wooddale Avenue were fortunate to have one of the mildest winters during the last 50.years. The Board discussed the notification of the neighbors and the lack of any.serious objection. Mr. Martinson argued that the boulevard Elms on West 50th Street are a major community asset that transcends local consideration. However, the issue has been decided and cannot be changed at this time. No further action taken. Mr. Sand said the West 50th Street project also includes the reconstruction of a stone retaining wall in front of the George W. Baird House at 4400 West 50th Street. This is a National Register of Historic Places property and is zoned Heritage Preservation District by the City, therefore, it is under the purview of the Heritage Preservation Board. He presented a copy of the 1926 Hennepin County right -of -way plan for West 50th Street construction indicating the retaining wall and entrance monuments were not in place prior to construction and the wall was probably installed to accommodate cuts made during that project. Jack and Marilyn Curtis, the owners of the Baird House indicated that "poppa Darr" constructed the wall from stones salvaged from the foundation of the sheep shed or .other out buildings previously located in the area occupied by Edina Court. The wall is constructed of limestone and has some fieldstone exposed. The wall and stones are crumbling and require maintenance. Mr. Martinson said it would be appropriate to review more detail plans if the wall must be removed. The typical retaining walls constructed in the City do not have appropriate standards detailing such as cap stones lips or drips. Mr. Martinson moved that the Board remind the Engineering Department that the Baird House is a National Register Site and a HPD Zoned site and the Board is concerned about the removal and replacement of the corner piers and the wall. That the Board would like to review their general drawings, their wall sections specifications and material specifications prior to doing any work. Mrs. Wilder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Mr. Stuart and Mr. Martinson said that the portion of West 50th Street west of Wooddale was improved substantially in its functional characteristics by the reconstruction project. B. General. Mr. Sand said that the Country Club District has lost a number of boulevard elms to Dutch elm disease and the owners in some cases are replacing those trees with a variety of tree types in an uncoordinated fashion. The Park Department has replaced two boulevard trees with 3" to 4" caliper hackberry at the southwest corner of Drexel Avenue and Sunnyside Road. The City Forester feels Hackberry is a wonderful species that is disease free at the present time and the scale, shape, color, texture and growth characteristic is very similar to the American Elm and thus represents an ideal replacement for missing elms. Mr. Sand expressed concern that Hackberry is not an elm and wide spread use of Hackberry and other varieties of boulevards trees will adversely affect the historic integrity and visual continuity of the Country Club District. He related contacts with Mr. Donald Willeke, chairman of the Minnesota State Shade Tree Conference who advocated the use of several varieties of disease resistant.elm that have been recently developed. Two varieties of disease resistant elm, the Regal Elm and the Sapporo Autumn Gold Elm are available from McKay Nursery Company is Waterloo, Wisconsin. Mr. Sand presented brochures illustrating the trees and scientific reports on the disease testing conducted by Dr. Smalley at the University of Wisconsin. The Regal Elm has an open branching characteristic and the sapporo Autumn Gold Elm has more dense foliage. The maximum size available at the present time is • 1 -1/4" to 1 -1/2" caliper which means they would have to be planted in the City nursery before placement in the boulevard. Both trees are new cultivars and the mature size and life span is subject to speculation; they are crosses between the Korean Elm and the Japanese Elm. Mr.Martinson said the key to a good replacement is not the leaf structure but the branching structure to replace the arching characteristic of the American Elm. In the East, they replaces elms with Silver Maple. He related the experience in Grundy Center, Iowa where all the elms were replaced with Chrimson King Maples and now, 25 years later, the mature trees have a low branch structure with heavy shade and the streets and sidewalks are very dark, the grass doesn't grow and you can't see houses anymore. The replacement trees should be oriented to species with arching branch structure over the street. The Board generally discussed different tree characteristics and potential courses of action. Mr. Sand said it would be desirable to have the neighborhood respond in an organized . fashion and order similar trees in quantity . rather than replacing trees in a piecemeal fashion. Mr. Metil indicated that the City could provide leadership with a quality discount so there was a financial incentive for the owners. Mrs. Wilder indicated the Regal Elm looked promising and she was familiar with McKay Nursery and the horticultural work done at the University of Wisconsin. This is an excellent idea. Mr. Sand recommended the Board attempt to develop support for the program from the neighborhood rather than trying to impose a solution from the City to the neighborhood. Perhaps members of the Board that live in the District could pursue the .issue to gain support. No further action taken. III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT -SOUND WALL Mr. Sand said this item was for information only at this time. The Board may receive a specific proposal for formal consideration at a later date. The property owners at the west end of Sunnyside Road, adjacent to Minnesota Trunk Highway 100 have requested construction of a sound wall extending from the creek to 44th Street. The Minnesota Highway. Department requested comments from the Edina Engineering Department. There is no precise location or design specifications to review. The residents refer to existing sound walls constructed in the City and this may refer to the wall constructed north of the Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road in the Gleason Court Addition. The Board generally.agreed that the Country Club District Dwellings would benefit from a sound wall. No further action taken IV. 1885 U.S. Census Mr. Sand presented portions of the data base he -is developing from the 1885 U.S. Census. The study is attempting to locate residents from the census with property owners and houses illustrated on the 1886 county maps. The study may be useful for the celebration of the City Centennial in 1988. The data base can be sorted to gain demographic information about Edina residents of the period. V. Historic Buildings Mr. Sand presented a letter to Dr. and Mrs. Paul Carson proposing HPD Zoning of the Carson House (1941), 6001 Pine Grove Road. The last house designed by William Purcell. Dr. Carson has full documentation of the design as well as correspondence with the architect. However, Dr. Carson declined to consent to HPD Zoning at the present time. The Board generally agreed that this was a desirable approach that should be pursued with Trinity Chapel (18732), 4924 France Avenue South now known as Sheridan's Decorating Studio. No further action taken. VI. Historical Organization Meeting Mr. Sand said the Minnesota Historical Society is sponsoring a conference or with a section for Heritage Preservation Board. (April 3 -4, 1987) The City will reimburse the registration fee of any members who wish to attend. VII. National Preservation Week May 6 -10, 1987, Mr. Sand said the City could sponsor a program this year to generate interest in preservation and the forthcoming centennial celebration. No action taken.. VIII.Other Business: A. Norway Tour and Festival -The Board received information about a festival in Bardu, Troms County Norway, seeking immigrants who wished to retrace their "roots" in Norway. B. Mission Statement. Mr. Stuart explained that he attended the recent meeting concerning the City's Mission Statement Copies will be distributed to the Board. C. Peterson House, 312 Interlachen Bouelvard. Mr. Sand advised the Board that the HPD Zoning has been approved by theCity Council and the City Attorney will file a copy of the Ordinance with Hennepin County Recorder's office. D. 4900 Arden Avenue Mr. Sand indicated this dwelling is constructed on two platted lots. Mr. Gustafson has indicated that he plans to purchase the property and attempt to construct a new dwelling similar to the house at 4528 Bruce Avenue. The existing house may be constructed too close -to the common property line to permit a new dwelling. E. Edina Theatre, 3911 West 50th Street Mr. Sand indicated that Plitt Theatres, Owner of the Edina Theatre was acquired by Cineplex Odeon of Canada and they proposed to rebuild the theatre. The plans have not been submitted, however, they are discussing a significant increase in seating. F. Mayor's Award for Design Excellence. Mr. Sand presented draft of a concept for annual awards for projects that improve the quality of the built environment in Edina. The categories include: Architecture, Landscape Architecture, Engineering, Signage, Historic Preservation, Governmental and Rehabilitation IX. Next Meeting Date: April 28, 1987 at 7:30 p.m. X. Adjournment: r Mr. Martinson moved adjournment at 9:35 p.m. Mr. Gepner seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Respectfully submitted., k0fficiai Puoiicacionj CITY OF EDINA X.A. 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROPOSED ISSUANCE BY THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT REFUNDING BONDS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), will meet on May 4, 1987, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., at the City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, in Edina, Minnesota, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on a proposal that the City issue its general obligation tax increment refunding bonds (the Refunding Bonds), in order to refund in advance of their maturity all or a portion of the City's General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1985,.dated September 1, 1985, in the aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000 (the Series 1985 Bonds). The maximum aggregate principal amount of the Refunding Bonds is $13,200,000. The Prior Bonds were used to finance public redevelopment costs incurred by the City and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City (the HRA) in connection with the Edinborough Development presently being constructed in the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area. The Edinborough Development is generally located in the extreme southeast corner of the corporate limits of the City. The Ed.inborough Development is a mixed use development containing • commercial office building, a condominium housing project, • multifamily elderly rental housing facility, and a public park and other public amenities. The initial owner of the commercial office building is Edinborough Office East Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; the initial owner of the condominium housing project is the Edinborough Condominium Partnership, a Minnesota general.partnership; the initial owner of the multifamily rental housing facility is Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership; and the initial owner of the public park and other public amenities is the HRA. The principal of and.interest on the Refunding Bonds are expected to be paid from tax increments to be derived from the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Area, but if necessary for the payment of such principal and interest, ad valorem taxes will be required to be levied on all taxable property within the corporate limits of the City. All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above, or may file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set forth above. Dated: April 15, 1987. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL By /s /Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk 19ST CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 1 - - -- CHECK NO - AMOUNT----- _- . -_ -__ VENDOR __- ..__...____.._.- __ - -_I TEM__DESCR.I.PTI.ON AC.COUNLJVQ___INV M_P_._O -. -M_ MESSAGE -. 1" 111317 04/22/87 228.30- LAWSON PRODUCTS CORRECTION 40- 4540- 803 -80 - - - -1 1 -1317 - - ---- 04/22/87 -- -- 228. -30 -- ----- LAWSON._PRODUCTS REPAIR -PARTS 40-45.40.- 8.03-80. —____- ._._ .. .00 t — - - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- _ i i i -CK S 124002 04/29/87 10.92 AT d T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 - -- 124002 - -- 04/-29/87- __35.36 --------AT-. &. T_-_--- -_ -_ -- _.._.GEN - UP_PLIF-S f- 0m4504_133 -12 _ 46.28 s - - -.- 124003 -- - - -- 04/29/8 -7 -- - 261_- 14-_--.__ .ALBINSON--- .-- _- .____GEN�LPPLY 105-04.- 25.0-26__38414.3__... ' 261.14 * 124008 04/22/87 30.30 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 124008 - 04/ 22/-87 152 -32 KAMAN_BEARING. -A. -SPLY REP_A.I.R- PARTS 40- 4540_803- 80- 616_t40 182.62 * 124013 124013 124013 ' 124013 124018 No - - - - -- 124026 124026 124026 -- - 124026 °i 124026 a. 04/22/87 66.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 335 -30 1293 04/22/87 1- 14 -_80 -- ALTERNATOR.. REBUILD REPAIR_PAR,TS 10=4540- 560 - 56_1281. 04/22/87 116.62 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 1283 04/22/87 221.16 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 1291 04/29/87 6.75 AT R T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 6.75 * 50- 4256 - 821 -82 * ** -CKS . * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS —04/23/87_— -- 18.94 BADGER METER -INC- - WATER - METERS 40_1220- 0.00 - 00.484350. - 04/23/87 940.28 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220 - 000 -00 484340 04/27/87 1,203.60 BADGER METER INC WATER SUPPLIES 40 -1220- 000 -00 484916 -- - 04/22/87— - 313.66 - - - - -- BADGER METER - INC - -- REPAIR__PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 - 80__483605.__,__ - 04/22/87 128.83 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 484197 BROS 2,605.30 t GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 560 -56 287237 124031 I m 1 1 1 1 f 1 f * ** —CKS - -- 124031 - - -- 04/23/87 - 59.48- - - ---- BERTELSON -EROS INC- .- .____ -__ GEN SUPPLIES___ _10- 4504 - 540 -54 288770_ _- 124031 04/22/87 206.00 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 560 -56 287237 124031 04/29/87 15.80 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 490 -49 290958 -- 124031 04/29/87 16 .-76 BERTELSON_BROS.INC OFFICE -SPLY 1.0__4516- 510 - 51_.290887 - -__ 124031 04/29/87 20.36 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SPLY 10- 4516 - 510 -51 290840 124031 04/27/87 71.60 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 510 -51 289189 --124031 - 04/22/87 - -- 69-00— BERTELSON--BROS _INC -. - -- PARTS -. -- - -. - -. 1 0= 4620 -560- 56 - 284784 __..__._., _ _... 'i 124031 04/22/87 21.84 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516 - 611 -61 284600 K' 480.84 iitii# * ** -CKS : ell - _111_ 1240-33 94/23/87 85-50 - BERGFORD- TRUCKING INVENT RY 50- 4626_=822 -82 I m 1 1 1 1 f 1 f 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 2 - CHECK NO - DATE -- - - - - - -- AMOUNT - - - -- -- - -- -- VENDOR - -- ITEM -- DESCRIPT- -ION SCCOUNT- NO._INV-r-M - -P -0.-- N MESSAGE - 124033 04/23/87 132.60 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 124033 -- - - 04/23/87 - - - -- 1 12.30 BERGFORD -- TRUCKING - INVENTORY 50- 4626--862 -86 -- - - -- - - -- 330.40 -_ - *•* -CKS - 124035 04/23/87 123.48 BOUSTEAD ELEC & MFG REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 203493 124035 - - -- 04/23/87 - - - - -- - 135. 14------- BOUSTEAD. -ELEC -d- MFG- - - - - -, REPAIV- -PARTS 40- 4540 -801-80- 203261 -- - - - - - -- - - 258.62 • + -- - - -- - - *** -CKS 124037 04/22/87 74.00 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN AIR CONDITING 25- 4946 - 520 -52 00718 - - - -- -- - - - -- -- 74:00- *----- _. -- - -- __ - - - - - --- - - •s *s ** * ** -CKS 124039 04/22/87 1,297.96 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 003 -20 1,297.96 124040 04/29/87 53.85 BURGER BROS. GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 53.85 t 124041 04/29/87 33.56 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 26201 124041 04/27/87 294.75 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 124041- ---- 04/27/87 - -11- ,594.98- -- BURY- d CARLSON INC - - -- BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314-30 - - - -- -- - - - -- 124041 04/29/87 13,962.51 BURY & CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 26201 124041 04/27/87 187.92 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4540 - 540 -54 - - -- — 26-r 4)73 -72-* *** -CKS ! 124047 04/29/87 13.15 BROWN PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 440 -44 453402 , 13.15 *r* -CKS 124054 - - -- 04/22/87 - -- 123.60- - BATTERY - WAREHOUSE - - - -- REPAIR - -PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 90369-------- - 124054 04/23/87 111.00 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 94955 , 234.60 t ---- - - -• ttt* ** ---- - - - - -- -- ** -CKS � - - 124061 - - - 04/29/87 — - -A 0 -. 68 - - - - "A" -PLUS PRESORT - - -- POSTAGE- - 1 0- 4290 - 510 -51 -- - - - - -- -- 124061 04/29/87 20.30 °A° PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 , 30.98 124062 04/22/87 210.00 BROCK WHITE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 540 -54 195797 , 210.00 ---- - - - - - - - -- - -- -- * * t * * * - - - - -- - -------- -- r t * -CKS � - - -- 1240,66— 04/23/87 78.56 - —CDP- - — GEN - SUP -PLIES 10= 4504 - 540 4- 724754- - - - - -- - - ;� 78.56 r -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - - * *t -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA -- - -- CHECK NO..- DATE - - - - -- -- 124074 -- - - - --- 04/29/87. - - -- CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 3 AMOUNT -- _VENDOR___.__ _- .__-- ____ITEM_DESCRIP- -T.IDN ACCOUNT-NO- INV_ -M -P .0._ -N MESSAGE _ 22, 925.00--- - - - - -- CITY - -OF -- BLOOMINGTON -- __._SERVI_CES- -1 -0- 4201_ - 480 - 48_3492 -____ 22,925.00 r 95 CORRECT.ION__ _.- COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF COMMODITIES REPAIR PARTS 23- 4624- 613 -61 23 -4624- 613- 61_ - -- 23- 4624 - 613 -61 23- 4624- 613-61 947891 27 -4540- 664 -66 26018 048072 trs -CKS - -- tss -CKS ------ - -- - -- PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10 -4574- 440 -44 _ 124082 04/29/87 290.00 CONWAY FIRE d SAFETY 27- 4642- 661 -66 124082 -- 04/29/87---- -- - - - -- 180.00 -----.CONWAY FIRE -d SAFETY 124082 04/27/87 102.00 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY 124082 04/27/87 53.50 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY - - -- ---625- 50- -t - -- -- - - - - WATER rsssrs SUPPLY GEN SUPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 16452 124091 04/27/87 121.5s CITY OF EDINA -. -MERIT 124091 04/27/87 191.62 CITY OF EDINA _ 124091 - -- 04/27/87 - 27._ -10 CITY- OF_EDINA___. SUPPLY 124091 04/27/87 30.03 CITY OF EDINA ° 124091 04/27/87 27.10 CITY OF EDINA -2 10- 4504 - 646 -64 - -39 -7x4 0 -r -- -- - - - -- - -- -- 04/22/87- 124092 04/22/87 2,310.10 C d S DIST INC - - 124092- - 04/22/87 -- 2,- 310. -10-- C._3__S DIST INC----.--- 476.40 124092 04/22/87 21.86 C d S DIST INC 16542 124092 04/22/87 263.00 C 6 S DIST INC ' - -- - - - ----- - - -- -- - - - - -- 284_86 -t _ -- •sssst 04/22/87 ---453..25 MERIT. - SUPPLY - - -- PARTS.- _10- 4620- 560 - 56.16510. - -_ -_ 124125 124099 04/22/87 76.03 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO • 28- 4248 - 702 -70 16552 76.03 • 124125 04/22/87 ttsrrs MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 95 CORRECT.ION__ _.- COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF COMMODITIES REPAIR PARTS 23- 4624- 613 -61 23 -4624- 613- 61_ - -- 23- 4624 - 613 -61 23- 4624- 613-61 947891 27 -4540- 664 -66 26018 048072 trs -CKS - -- tss -CKS - -- - - - - -- - - t s t -CKS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10 -4574- 440 -44 91560 - EQUIP - -- REPLACEMENT_ 10 -4901- 440 -44- 91560 -__ _- SAFETY EQUIP 27- 4642- 661 -66 91365 SAFETY EQUIP 27- 4642- 661 -66 91366 rst -CKS WATER 10- 4258 - 520 -52 WATER 10- 4258 - 540 -54 _- WATER 1 0- 4258 - 646 -64 rrr -CKS WATER 50- 4258 - 821 -82 04/22/87 WATER 50- 4258 - 861 -86 SUPPLY 95 CORRECT.ION__ _.- COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF COMMODITIES REPAIR PARTS 23- 4624- 613 -61 23 -4624- 613- 61_ - -- 23- 4624 - 613 -61 23- 4624- 613-61 947891 27 -4540- 664 -66 26018 048072 trs -CKS - -- tss -CKS 124111 - - - -- 04/23/87- - 200 -.00 DAVIS-.WA-TER-EQUIP__CO CONST 200.00 r rrr -CKS T 124125 04/22/87 247.75 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 16452 - -- 124125- - 04/22/87 - .298.75 - -. -MERIT . SUPPLY---- _-- . - -____ -GEN- .SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 - 30_16446_ _ 124125 04/22/87 358.50 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 124125 04/22/87 375.86 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 16468 - - -- 124125 - - -- 04/22/87- -- 448.44 - -- MERIT SUPPLY - -.- ----- .-- . - -. -__ GEN SUPPLIES - -10- 4504 - 646 -64 16467.- - -. - -. 124125 04/23/87 476.40 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 16542 s.. 124125 04/22/87 453.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 16476 -- - 124125 04/22/87 ---453..25 MERIT. - SUPPLY - - -- PARTS.- _10- 4620- 560 - 56.16510. - -_ -_ 124125 04/22/87 122.75 MERIT SUPPLY CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 702 -70 16552 124125 04/22/87 451.50 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 16554 124125 - -- - 04/29/87-- -- - - -- 453.25 -- - MERIT - SUPPLY------ - - - - -- GEN SUPPLIES- - - -40- 4504 - 801 -80 - 16610.------ -. - - -- .... 124125 04/22/87 112.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 4544- 801 -80 16489 JI 4, 251 .70 r 124126 04/29/87 215.25 DAVIS EUGENE WEED INSPECTION 10- 4100 - 985 -90 124126 04/29/87 34.23 DAVIS EUGENE MILEAGE 10 -4208- 985 -90 1987 L_ . OF EDINA CHECK STER 05- 04 -8', +GE 4 - CHECK NO— DATE------ - - - - -- AMOUNT- - - - - -- ---- - - -- -- VENDOR - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- ITEM-- DESCRIPT- ION - ACCOUNT-NO_INV-_.*-P-,O.-S- MESSAGE -- , 249.48 # ------------- -- - - -- - - - -- - ss# -CKS � - -- 124130 -----04/22/87-- — - - -- 81 -90 - -- -- DUNE - BUGGY -- SUPPLY— -CONT- R EPA IRS 28 -4248- 704 -70 -- 22502 - - -- - -- - -- 81.90 # • -- - - - - -- - -- - . * ** -CKS 124132 04/29/87 345.00 PHYSIO CONTROL EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 440 -44 A27775 • - -- _ _--- -. - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- 345.- 00- -• - - -- - -- -- — - — =' *** -CKS • 124136 04/23/87 73.73- EARL F ANDERSEN CORRECTION 10- 4212- 510 -51 • 124136 04/23/87 73.73 EARL F ANDERSEN ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 510 -51 69027 - 124136-- -- 04/23/87- — 93:73— — EARL - -F -- ANDERSEN - - -- -ADVERT -1-SING 1- 0- 42- 1- 2 -5" -51 -69027 - -- - -- 93.73 i • - 124137 - -- 04/29/87 - - 125.20 - - E KRAEMER & SONS INC -- -GEN SUPPLIES - - -- 10 -4504- 358 -30 81437 -- - -- 124137 04/22/87 133.64 E KRAEMER 6 SONS INC CLASS V MATERIALS 10- 4532 - 314 -30 81145 • 3i 124137 04/23/87 122.82 E KRAEMER 3 SONS INC GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -60 81336 - -- - - -- 381 -66-* --- -- -- - " * ** -CKS _ 124158 04/29/87 172.42 FEED RITE CONTROL CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 682 -68 84619 , 124158 04/23/87 2,125.80- FEED RITE CONTROL CREDIT 40- 4622- 803 -80 53395 - -- 124158 - -- 04/23/87 -- 2,399.. -30 — FEED RITE - CONTROL- WATER- SUPPLIES 40 -4622- 803 -80 84027-------- - -- 124158 04/23/87 1,652.48 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER SUPPLIES 40- 4622 - 803 -80 84028 124158 04/23/87 740.00 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER SUPPLIES 40- 4622- 805 -80 84007 --- - -- - - - - - - -- - -- - -- 2x838 -40 - - - - --- -- - — - - - - - " t ** -CKS *ss *s# _ 124160 04/23/87 121.00 FLOYD LOCK & SAFE CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 32616 , 121.00 s -- 124162 - - -- 04/22/87 - - - -- 16.24- -- FOWLER ELECTRIC ---- - - - - -- REPAIR PARTS- 27- 4540 - 664 -66- 6405 -7— _ 124162 04/22/87 53.80 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 , 70.04 ------ - - - --- ----- - - - - -- - ss* -CKS 124167- -- 04/29/87 -- - -- 975.00 - - - -- FIRST NATIONAL BANK - - - -- INTEREST - BONDS-- 27--4300- 661 -66 — -- - - - - -- 975.00 - - - -- - - - -- *i* -CKS 124183 04/23/87 30.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 72084 ------- ._.... — -- 30:00 -s -- --- - - - - -- -- - -- SGI * ** -CKS *ti*is , 1987 CITY OF EDINA 04/29/87 - - -- 124188 - CHECK NO -, -- DATE - - -- -- 124185 - -- 04/22/87 124185 04/22/87 a 124185 04/22/87 - - 124185 - -- 04/22/87 -. -- __..._ -GEN SUPPLIES 124188 04/29/87 - - -- 124188 - -- 04/23/87 124188 04/23/87 124188 04/23/87 - 124188 -- 04/23/87 * - O ---- - - - - -- 145.00 ----------- + *** ** - -- - - -- - - -- - - --- - -- ------- -' - --- * ** -CKS 124192 04/22/87 224.50 WEST WELD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-646 -64 64642 124192 - - - - -- 04/22/8 -7- - - - -- - 106- ,65----- - -. - -- -WEST- WELD------ - - - - -- WELDING - SUPPLIES-- 1- 0--46 -10_- 560 =56- 6497 -0-_._ _ 331.15 * -- * * * * ** - CHECK REGISTER -- -- - - - - -- - - - 05 -04 -87 PAGE 5 -- AMOUNT----,- --------,---VENDOR-.- -- ---- -._ * *r -CKS ---- - -. - -- ITEM- .DESCRIP -ION ACCOUNT -NO -- INV_ -N -P .0.- N MESSAGE - -- ---- - - - - -- 145.00 ----------- GOODIN CO---- - - - - -- -. -- __..._ -GEN SUPPLIES -10- 4504 - 358 -30 424982 - - - -- 77.50 GOODIN CO - - -- GENERAL -- GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 358 -30 421947 147.50 GOODIN CO 04/27/87 REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 421649 ---200.13 ------- GOODIN- CO-- _ - -. -.- _ --REPAIR-PARTS 124194 4.0= 4540.-8.03 -80 -- 422420.-- .- .-- ._ -__... 570.13 + COMMUNICATNS EQUIP REP 10- 4901 - 650 -64 - - -- - - - - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - --- - - -- - -- -'- - * * * - CK S - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- 15.22 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 336936 - - - -- -95.28 ---GRAYBAR-ELECTRIC-CO _ 124202 - -. - - -- ..REPAIR- -PARTS 10- 4540 - 640 - 64.330735 SHOOTERS 95.28 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 640 -64 330735 95.28- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO CORRECTION 10- 4540 - 640 -64 330735 - -- 305. -13 - GRAYBAR- ELECTRIC- -CO -- ---- -CONST 60= 4-300-264-04- 331427 -- 415.63 * * * * * ** + *** ** - -- - - -- - - -- - - --- - -- ------- -' - --- * ** -CKS 124192 04/22/87 224.50 WEST WELD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-646 -64 64642 124192 - - - - -- 04/22/8 -7- - - - -- - 106- ,65----- - -. - -- -WEST- WELD------ - - - - -- WELDING - SUPPLIES-- 1- 0--46 -10_- 560 =56- 6497 -0-_._ _ 331.15 * -- * * * * ** - - -- -- -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- ---- -._ * *r -CKS a - 124194 04/29/87 24.80 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 76104 124194 - - - -- 04/27/87------- - - - - -- 125, -00-- .--- - - - - -- GENERAL -- COMMUNICATNS - - - -- CORRECTION - - - -- - -1 0 -4901- 650 -64 - - - - - - -- . -- 124194 04/27/87 125.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP REPACEMENT 10- 4901 - 650 -64 75968 124194 04/27/87 11250.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP REP 10- 4901 - 650 -64 274x80--* - r *r * ** * ** -CKS _ 124202 04/29/87 478.10 GOPHERS SHOOTERS AMMUNITION 10- 4572- 420 -42 018524 124202 04/27/87 195.67 GOPHERS SHOOTERS TARGETS 29- 4648 - 722 -72 019745 , 673.77 - *- - - -- ----- - - - - - -- - -- -- - * * * * ** * ** -CKS 124209 04/23/87 379.50 GENUINE PARTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 042620 124209 04/22/87 29.88 GENUINE PARTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 041921 - - - -- 124209 - - -- 04/22/87- - -- 29.05 - -- GENUINE PARTS-- - - - - -- REPAIR -PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56- 041742 - - -- - - 124209 04/22/87 15.60 - GENUINE PARTS CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 041175 124209 04/23/87 13.92 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 043066 - - 124209 - - -- -04/22/87------- - - -23. 94 • - - -- GENUINE PARTS - -- .-- - - - - -- REPAIR-- PARTS_ -10- 4540-560-56-038630 -- -- - - 124209 04/22/87 18.71 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 041693 124209 04/23/87 40.00 GENUINE PARTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 043360 - - 124209----04/-23/87- 75.-90 - -- GENUINE- PARTS- - - - - -- GEN-SUPPA -IES 40- 504-801 =80- 043359-- .--- 595.30 r ** * * ** - - - - - -- -- - - - - - -... - -.. -- -- ----- ._.... -- - - - - -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- :_. *r* -CKS + 124215 04/22/87 5.77 HIRSHFIELDS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 111760 **r -CKS {r t t t t 1 0 t 1 1987 CITY OF EDINA ! CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 6 CHECK NO— DATE -- — AMOUNT - - - - -- VENDOR--- - - - - -- -- ITEM -DESCRIPTION — ACCOUNT-- NO:-- INV- .-- M- P- . -0.- -8 MESSAGE 124238 - - -- 04/22/87 - - - - -- - -27.00 - -- WM H MCCOY— ------ - - - -- GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30- 40101 - - - -- -- 124238 04/22/87 27.00 WM H MCCOY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 41060 CO - - -- 124304 04/23/87 54.00 + KNOX LUMBER CO 124304 04/23/87 * * * *s* KNOX LUMBER CO 124304 - -- 04/23/87 - - - -- 15:48----- * ** -CKS 124244 - - - - -- 04/23/87 - - - - -- --- 253: 88 -------HAYDEN MURPHY- - ----- REPAI-R- PARTS- —10- 4540 - 560 -56 -- CO ° 253.88 + 124305 04/22/87 -- ► *** * *- .. - -- - - -- - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - - - - - - -- -- - * ** -CKS -- - -- 124253 04/22/87 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 124313 - - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- 26 -. 50 H FOSTER * * * * ** * ** -CKS 124278 04/27/87 37.55 JERRYS FOODS REPAIR PARTS 23- 4540 - 613 -61 37.55 + * ** -CKS -- 124286 04/22/87— 79:20 - JUSTUS LUMBER - - -- -- GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 49389 - -- 124286 04/22/87 53.07 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 49476 124286 04/22/87 85.12 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 49527 - - -- 124286 - -- 04/23/87- -- 352:98 - - ---- JUSTUS- LUMBER -- - - - - -- REPAIR -PARTS 27- 4540 - 666 -66- 245 - - - - -- - -- �, 570.37 + -- -t ** -CKS 124294 04/23/87 192.51 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 124294 - -- 04/23/87 - -- 15.32 - - - -- CRESCENT ELECTRIC - -- - -- REPAI- R- PARATS-- - - -40- 4540 - 801- 80 - - -- 207.83 • i 124301 04/27/87 1,430.00 KREMER SPRG. & ALIGN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 17442 _.— - ---------- - - - -1- 430 - 00 --* - -- O ! 124304 04/23/87 31.72 KNOX LUMBER CO 124304 04/23/87 39.29 KNOX LUMBER CO - - 124304 -- 04/23/87 — - -- -221 .06 - -- KNOX LUMBER CO - - -- 124304 04/23/87 87.98 KNOX LUMBER CO 124304 04/23/87 26.46 KNOX LUMBER CO 124304 - -- 04/23/87 - - - -- 15:48----- - -KNOX LUMBER CO - -- 124304 04/23/87 35.52 KNOX LUMBER CO ° 457.51 124305 04/22/87 27.30 K d K SALES 27.30 124313 - -- 04/22/87 - - - 70.25 - JOHN H FOSTER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS -- REPAIR -PARTS REPAIR PARTS TOOLS - -- LUMBER - - - - -- LUMBER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS - *** -CKS + *+ -CKS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 501590 10- 4540 - 520 -52 501681 10- 4540 - 520 -52 501934 - - 10 -4540- 540 -54 501401 10- 4580 - 301 -30 501780 10- 4604- 646 -64- 501657 - - - - - -- - 10- 4604- 646 -64 501665 10- 4540 - 520 -52 99429 - -40- 4540 - 801 -80 - - - - -- - -- - *** -CKS , 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 7 - - -- CHECK NO,- DATE­ - - -- -- AMOUNT- ------- - - - -.VENDOR-------------- - - --- ITEM -- DESCRIPTION .ACCOUNT- NO- .- INV- .- N -_P.0- M MESSAGE 124313 04/22/87 277.24 JOHN H FOSTER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 -- ---- - - - - -- -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- 347.49- + - ------------- - - - - -- - - -- - t * * * ** * ** -CKS 124316 04/23/87 337.59 LAMOTTE CHEMICAL GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 106605 - _ 337.59 + 124317 04/22/87 196.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 124317 04/22/87 15.54 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 322 -30 124317 - -- 04/22/87 -- -- -- 112, 53 - -- - LAWSON PRODUCTS - -- -GEN- SUPPLIES 10-4504-646-64 -- - -- - -- - - 124317 04/22/87 128.36 LAWSON PRODUCTS SIGNS & POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 124317 04/22/87 194.64 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 - -- 124317 -- 04/22/87----------- - - - - -- -t 49.59- - LAWSON PRODUCTS - - -- - -. -- PARTS- - - - - -- -10- 4620- 560- 56---- - - - - -- -- 124317 04/22/87 287.84 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 124317 04/22/87 228.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 124318 04/22/87 29.70 LEEF BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 * * *t ** * ** -CKS " 124324 - - 04/29/87 - - -- - -- 2,369.40 - -- - - - - -- - - - -- LOGIS .._.. - - --------- ,. - -- COMPUTER BILLING -- - -- 10- 4233 - 160 -16 - - - - - -- . 124324 04/29/87 2,526.64 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 10 -4233- 200 -20 - - - -- 04/29/87 - - - -- -2, 259. 1 0 - -- -- -LOGIS -- --- -- - - -. ---COMPUTER BILLING 1 0- 4233 - 420 -42 124324 04/29/87 2,342.92 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 40- 4233 - 800 -80 - 124324 04/29/87 274.87 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 50- 4233 - 820 -82 - -- 124324 - - - 04/29/87- 274.87- - LOGIS- -- — COMPUTER - BILLING 50- 4233 - 840- 84--------- - -. - -. 124324 04/29/87 274.88 LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING 50- 4233 - 860 -86 10,322.68 + t * *t ** --- - - - - -- * ** -CKS - -- 124342 - -- 04/22/87- - ---. -- 352.01 -- MAC QUEEN EQUIP -- INC - - - - -- REPAIR - PARTS 10-4540-560-56-72808- .. - 124342 04/22/87 25.91 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 72626 377.92 + 124343 04/22/87 116.75 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 12106 124343 04/22/87 31.82 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 12146 -- 124343 - - - - -- 04/22/87- - -- -59.66 -- - - - - -- MINNESOTA - GLOVE-- - - - - -- -.GEN- SUPPLIES 10-4504- 646- 64 ---- --- . - - -_- 208.23 s -- 124344 - - - - - -- 04/29/57 --_ --- _._.22.05-- - - - - -- MED OXYGEN & EQUIP - - - - -- -EQUIP MAINT - -10- 4274- 440- 44------- - - - - -- - 124344 04/29/87 31.73 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 * 124344 04/29/87 32.33 MED OXYGEN E EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10 -4510- 440 -44 + + * * * ++ ++* -CKS 124346 04/29/87 217,752.34 MET N WASTE C L COMM SEWER SERVICE 40- 4312- 812 -80 4109 217,752.34 + * * * -CKS - - - - - -- 124355--- - - - - -- 04/29/8 -7 -- 4-3-3 -1 - -NAIL- GUARDIAN - -SYST -- ALARM - SERVICE 234304- 6 -t2-61- 12304 - - - - -- -- � f 1987 CIFY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 8 CHECK NO.-DATE - - - - - - -- AMOUNT--------- - - - - -- -- -- -- VENDOR -- - - -- ITEM- DESCRIPT -ION ACCOUNT - NO.-- INV.-M P:O. A MESSAGE 124358 04/29/87 2,890.20 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERV 27- 4304 - 662 -66 12161 - 1243S8 04/29/87 -- -- 100.15 - -- - NATL GUARDIAN SYST-- - - - - -- ALARM -SERV 28- 4304 - 702 -70 -12163 - 124358 04/29/87 141.42 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 821 -82 124358 04/23/87 157.39 NATL GUARDIAN SYST ALARM SERVICE 50- 4304 - 861 -86 - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - -- — 3,42287- t-- - - - - -- 124359 04/22/87 160.37 MINN TORO INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 648134 124359 - - 04/22/87 - - - - - - -- 13.99 - - -- MINN TORO INC - - -- -- -- REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 647985 124359 04/22/87 142.14 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 648092 124359 04/29/87 46.80 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 651554 - - -- 124359 -- 04/27/87 - - - -- - - - - -- 89.97 - - - -- MINN TORO INC ------ - - - - -- REPAIR -PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 651005 - -- 124359 04/29/87 175.24- MINN TORO INC CREDIT 27- 4540 - 664 -66 C78715 278.03 s 124360 04/23/87 16.80 MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 065552 124360 04/23/87 49.50 MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 065534 - -- 124360 - - 04/23/87 - 57 -.00 -- MINNESOTA - WANNER GEN- SUPPL -IES 26- 4504 - 682 -68- 065804-- ------ 123.30 -- --i *1111 .._.--- ------ -- --'-- -- --- -'- -- -'- - - --- -- -- ------- - ---- -- * ** -CKS - 124381 04/27/87 135.84 STAR 6 TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10 -4212- 510 -51 - - - -- 124381- - 04/27/87- 169.80 -- STAR - -3- TRIBUNE- - ADVERT -ISING 1.0- 4242- 51.0 -5 -1 - - - - -- 305.64 - -- - - - - -- - *** -CKS 124400 04/23/87 21.70 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 10- 4616- 560 -56 - - - - -- - -- 21- . -70 -s * ** -CKS 124406 04/23/87 84.92 NTCC INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 M84385 ' 124406 04/23/87 177.96 NTCC INC REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 M84249 -- - -- - -- -- 262: 88 - *- * *isis * ** -CKS 124413 04/23/87 316.61 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 ' 124413 04/23/87 86.50 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 12441 -3 — 04/23/87 - -- 126:72 - NATIONWIDE PAPERS- - - - - -- GEN -- SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664- 66 - - - -- - - - - - -- 529.83 -- -- — -- - - - -- - - - s* *-CKS 124417 04/29/87 116.60 OFFSET PRINTING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 27344 - - - -- - - ' -16-. 60- * * *s ** * ** -CKS 124421 04/27/87 170.08 OLSON CHAIN d CABLE TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 2270 ' 170.08 s * *ss* *** -CKS 124452 - - 04/22/87 - - - -- — 33.26 - -- -- QUICK SERV BATTERY----.------ REPAIR- PARTS —- 10 -4540- 560 -56 - 14261- - - - - -- -- 1987•CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 9 CHECK -NO,- DATE- - - - - -- AMOUNT----------- .. -. - -- .. _._- VENDOR. -. - .- _.- .-- .- .____.- _.._.ITEM- DESCRIPT -ION - ACCOUNT-- NO.-- INV -. - - -# P -. -O.- k MESSAGE 124452 04/22/87 6.89 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 14290 124452 -- - - - - -- 04/22/87---- --_. - - - -- 82,84 - - -- -- -QUICK SERV - BATTERY - REPAIR- PARTS -- 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15445 - . 122.99 - - - -- - --- -- - .. -. -s** -CKS - - - -- - - - - - -- -- 124457 04/22/87 216.75 R.L.000LD & CO.INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 03320 • 124457 - - -- 04/22/87 - - - - -- - - -.- 54.77--- ------- - - - -R. L.000LD- d-- CO.INC.- .- - - -. -- REPAIR -PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66- 03321 - - - - -. 271.52 " e ---- - - - - -- -- - ----- - * * * -CKS - - -- - 124462 04/22/87 32.85 RENTAL EQUIP d SALES CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 646-64 5546 -- 124462- - - - -- 04/22/87 - -- - 51 -. 85 - - - -- --.RENTAL- EQUIP & SALES----- - -TOOS - +- 0=4580- 644 -64. 5973---- 84.70 • t * * s * * -- -- — — - - -- - - - -- -- - -- -- -- - - - • -. * * *- CKS -- — - - -- - 124465 04/22/87 30.00 RICHFIELD PLUMB d CO CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248- T02 -70 2785 • s * *ss* * ** -CKS • 124473 04/22/87 51.76 R.E. MOONEY 6 ASSOC. PAINT 40- 4544 - 801 -80 7124 ' 51.76 * ** -CKS - - - -- 124484- 04/-29/87 .1- 16 -.61 AMERICAN - SHARECOM -_ TELEP -MONE 10a4256_S -L0- 51_.75548 - -____ 116.61 • * ***st__ . -- - - - - -- -- -- ._..._...__.. ---- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- ._ . * ** -CKS - - -- 124490 04/22/87 148.84 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 325 -30 • 124490 - 04/22/87 - -- —23-98---SHERWIN WILLIAMS -- PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64__ ____- 124490 04/22/87 49.75 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 10- 4544 - 646 -64 124490 04/23/87 43.95 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 27- 4544 - 662 -66 • - - - - -- ---------- -- - - - - - 266 -_52 -s s*ts ** *** -CKS • 124492 04/23/87 38.78 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARAS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 143121 124492 04/23/87 28.78 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 142587 • 124492 - --04/23/87 -- --- - - - - -- -24.06- - SOUTHDALE -FORD CORREC-TION= -10-4540-S60-56- - - _- _ 124492 04/23/87 10.87 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 143280 124492 04/23/87 38.78 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 142587 • - 124492 - - - -- 04/23/87- -- 28.78- -- SOUTHDALE- FORD - - - - -- CORRECTION -- 1 -0- 4540 - 560 -56 124492 04/23/87 74.05 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 142305 1-�8 -43-* • t * *s *t *** -CKS - - - - -- 124502 - - - -- 04/23/87 21- .50 - -- SUBURBAN - CHEVROLET- CONT- REPAIRS 10- 4248-S60-56-43959--__ 124502 04/23/87 192.50 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 1536 124502 04/23/87 8.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71939 J � 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 .-AGE 10 CHECK NO.- DATE - - -- AMOUNT------ - - - - -- - -• -- VENDOR - - - - - -- ITEM -DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT- NO. -INV. # P -O. - -# MESSAGE - 124502 04/23/87 .72 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS.. 10- 4540-560 -56 71701 124502 -- 04/23/87 -- — - - - - -- -30.78 - -- SUBURBAN CHEVROLET - - - -- REPAIR PARTS -10- 4540 - 560 -56 71074 124502 04/23/87 134.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71269 124502 04/23/87 23.20 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71981 124502 - - 04/23/87 — - — 192.56 - - - SUBURBAN CHEVROLET - -- -- REPAIR PARTS- -10- 4540 - 560 -56 71537 - -- - 124502 04/23/87 8.55 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71182 124502 04/23/87 28.68 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 71746 _ _ - - - -- - - -- - ---- - - - - -- -640.49--* — - -- -. -- - 124503 04/22/87 8.08 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 - 124503 — 04/23/87 -- -- -16.31 -- - SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP - -- -- REPAIR PARR 10- 4540 - 520- 52 - - -- - - - - -- 124503 04/23/87 45.08 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 124503 04/29/87 34.38 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 - 124503 ---04/22/87­----- -- -- 25.51- ---------SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP - - - - -- REPAI -R- PARTS -- -40- 4540- 803 -80 --- - - - - -- -- - 129.36 t -- tss *s* -- * ** -CKS - - --- - - - - -- - -- - -- - -- 124505 04/29/87 85.41 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 ssssss * ** -CKS 124508 04/29/87 1.47 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 31175 124508 04/29/87 7.56 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 31516 124508 - - -- 04/29/87 -- - - - - -- 7.67 - -- ST PAUL BOOK - - ---- -- GEN SUPPLIES -- 10 -4504- 440 -44 31513 - -- -- 124508 04/29/87 56.42 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 31136 124508 04/29/87 69.01 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 470 -47 - 124508 -- -- 04/29/87 - 37-.-31 ST -- PAUL - BOOK - - -- - GEN - SUPPLIES '0- 4504 - 470 -47 -- 5311 -1- - - - - - -- - 179.44 * 124516 04/22/87 124516 - -- 04/22/87 124516 04/22/87 sss *ss 351.00 207;28-- 72.00 630.28 s - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - - * * * -CK S SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 103355 - -SEARS ROEBUCK -. -- -- — - TOOLS - -- 40- 4580 - 801 -80 281314 -- SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 278053 - - -- -124526- - 04/29/87 - - - -- - 4,860.. -2F- TRACY OIL - 4,860.21 * tttttt - - - - -- 124550 04/22/87 *t * *ts 124553 04/23/87 124553 04/23/87 - - -- 124553 ---- 04/23/87 -- y l� . .I 79.30 TISDEL STANDARD -79 : -30 -- * - --- - - -- - -- - - - -- GASOL -INE REPAIR PARTS * ** -CKS 12- 560 -56- 45079 - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- s ** -CKS 10- 4540- 560 -56 12583 * ** -CKS 463.07 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 339.21 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 31-.-81 UNITED- ELECTRIC -CORP REPA -IR -PARTS 40- 4540- 80a -80 -- - - - - -- -- 834.09 - -- -- - -- -- - - -- - -- - - -- - -... -- - - - - -- — - - - - -- - *s* -CKS E r r. C - ' 1987 CITY or soIm* cxsom msozmrse ns-u*-or pAos 11 oxsuw mn.-DATa------------*nowmz--- -vsmDom Tsm-osocmzezzou______Auooumz-mm_-zwu--wp'o- w nsoawws .. vawsao ---04/2e/87� --'---'---- 20. 00 -' MAMA------ ------ LumCosnm_- n=yena=�Ao-v* ' aw�uo * '-***-cma ` - 124s73 04/e3/87 43.20 Vnww osw wuppLzsa 10-4504-540-5* 160*9 , ------- ---'------------�s-eo-*-'-'-_'___'____--_'_--_--_-_____-_- ____ _ ***-cmo " . 12457s 0*/23/87 90.00 wArsm pnoowcTo osm muppLIsw 10-*504-646-6* 0346se ~ 1e457s 04/ee/87 1e0.00 WATER pmooumTe mepwzm p*mro 40-4s40-803-80 033s57 ' ' - - ------- ------'-------evo.no-*----__-__ _ --__-_---_---_-______-------------------------- ---'--- ~ ****** ***-cxs ` 1e4579 04/e3/87 111.91 WILLIAMS aTssL-xows Gsm nuppLzse 10-4504-560-56 7*482 ' . 1e4579 04/e3/87 *o.no WILLIAMS oTssL-xows TOOLS 10-4580-301-30 7ee16 ^ -- '-----------------'-'----�sy-wn-*---'--------'--___-______-__-_ '--___-- �_. ***-CKo ^ / 1e*582 04/ee/87 331.17 GORDON nnzT* co mAmwLzws e7-461e-66*-66 1025 ~ 331.17 * . ****** -. ***-cwa —124584 --- 4/ao 61-.-1w---WAnmER-IwoUSTRz*I ___msm-SUPPLzs 0=_450*=30_1_n-30_____-__. , ea1.v* * ******'--------- -' --- -'- '-----------'------ -------------- -'***-cuo - 1e4603 0*/e3/87 45.55 uzrTsw moLr awppLr mspwzm pwnrw 27-45*0-666-66 26118 , _—_-- =`5 - _-- ' ***-Cwe ° ' 124701 ow/ee/or *3'67e.26 *smmspzw coumTr nos on* vo-vv*s-non-nn - � 1e4701 04/ee/e7 e8'53e.44 *smwspzm couwTr mpsC Aoosao 10-*9ee-506-50 ° ***-Cwo " '. vawTns 0*/e2/87 *ys.nn CrLzmosn CITY INC nnmT msp*zRw 10-*e*8-s60-s6 *ws* ~ *ys.ou * ` ve*rna 04/22/87 167.80 moPxsR OIL conp*mr wsm mupPLzsS 10-4sp*-s60-s6 303+ss - 167.80 * . 1e4707 0*/2e/87 80.83 cnmr n*psrr souIp msm ouppLIsn 10-*50*-6*6-64 11048e - 1e4707 04/ee/87 123.01 cowT oApsTr smuzp msw auppLIsw 10-*504-801-80 109773 , --1e4707 4ve2/8 73.01--------CowT-w*rETY-suuzp ____wArsz*-smux o=46 *e=3,0.�~3 0 -1�01+0_-------- - *76.85 * ^. --� ° —12470e --- 4/22/e 0*a3---- oDWAY-IwowUPpLY----GEN--SUPPLIs **�-32S�30-S2947_ , * vnoT L..r OF sozwa cxsnw mo_ DATE --- --'Anmumr cxsnu *=aIwTse ts-u+-oT p*os ----vsmoon - -- - '----ITEM DsoomzpT-IOm-------*CCouwT -NO --zmv.-wp.n. w nswaAws . 1e4708 04,e2/87 *u.vn nznw*r xwo auppLr msm muppLIso 10-4504-325-30 s3663 ' - -------- -----------, SO. 43 *-------- - - -' ---' ----- - ------'--- ----- 124709 nw/ae/ar 21.s6 TOWN m nmwmTnY owoms Rsp*zm PARTS vn-*s*n-san-sa snyes - -- -------- ------------'21.s6 *------ - -- -'--''- --- - ___- -_- � vawrvn 0*/2e/87 266.37 m*mpr sswALL rooLm vn-*swn-swn-sa 106s67 . - ' ----- -' 266 .37- '-- - - ------' _ 1e*711 04/22/87 816.10 envsnmmswr TR*xmzmG osnvICs 10-*e01-100-10 368s ' -- -- -------'----------------u 1a. 10 *- --- -- '- '- - ------- ----------_---- ^ 1e*71e 04/ee/87 Is.nn JANET cxwmoLsm esznmwmosnsmT 10-4sn*-507-sn , ' - ---- ----' -'----�s.un-*-- --- ' - - - - --- ----- ---' --------- _ -- '- - , 1e4713 o*/ae/or *ya.00 TsoanAm ossn u cxsn aoo m mLwcm nznT 10-4562-6*4-64 12e739 -' 1e*713 ----o4/2e/87-------------830.00--------rsoamAm osso u o*sn----'osso 0-4s6e-6*e-6*-1ee738 '---- - ' �a*��� o��ee�o7 a^oso.ou Tsomn*m osso m o*sm wsso vu-*saw-awo-aw 1ee730 - 3,372.00 * 1e*714 nw/ee/ar 90.00 aC**psm souIpnsmr co rooLo vo-*smn-om-sn 1315e3 90.00 * 1e4715 04/e3/87 100.00 JIM HATCH owLso CO wsm ouppLzsm 10-4sn*-560-56 7105 1e*71s o*/ea/oT 11s.9* zzn *wTc* o*Lso CO Tomuy 10-*580-301-30 Twoo .�--'1e*715 oxTu*-owLso om-----'Gsm-wuppLzs S 40-4504-801--80-7105---- - .' 3e7.s4 * ' ..----1e4716- -----w*/eevo e1_m3-------'mowr ouwzmswu-mYsT-------pmzw7-Im ~4600-200~e0--'----------- , 21.03 * , 1e4717' ----n*/ea/or------­----eov.aV ------mTsuAnr-LwnesR ----- REPAIR-PARTS 0-4540-5e0-5e 762e7-- 201.60 * - 1e4718 '---'04/e2/87------------698.36--------wnssLsm Lumosm -----CORRECTION 10-4504-335-30 ----'--- . 1e4718 nw/ae/or 69.36 wxssLsR Lwmaso osm wwppLIsn 10-4504-335-30 ^ _! 1e*718 n*/ea/eT 698.36 u*ssLsn Lumose osm ouppLzsw 10-450*-335-30 - - - '------ -' an,�a-*------' '- -- ---' ---------'-'--- -- ' -_--_--_ '. 1e*719 04/e2/87 3*1.00 Comvsrmno INC esm muppLzsw 10-450*-301-30 Cmewue -- '----- *1-0 0 -*------' --' -- - '-------------- - _-'-__ ___--___- ' ) 1e47e0 nw/ee/or *4e.25 wsLSow RADIO COMM Rsp*zR pAmro 10-45+0-560-56 1*32e '- - ------'- �a.es-*-------- '- ---' --- ' -------- --- --_ ' __ `.' 1247e1 ow/ae/wr 392.52 wsmrozos smuIp Co nspwzR p*nTo 10-4540-s40-s4 93e1 -' --'- -------'- ye.se'*---------' -- - -- ---- ---' - -_-______ _ ' 1e472e 0*/e7/87 160.00 CowT nspAzno *0-4e48-801-80 e1301 1247ee ----mw/ea/w 4e1.9e'-------mnnrwa7An wATsnumowS ------ REPAIR-PARTS o-*s*w-ono-ew eanov . 581.92 * ---ve47e3-----n4/ee/o s7n.s3-------'RAzmouu-LsAmzmG -CO-------Comr-msR ~4e00�Sw7-50--------- - - 570.53 * "7 1e+7e* ---'**/2e/e7 ---'� ------��es,no-------nwowALsws-poesLT AMBULANCE -REFUND- 10-31e0-000-00 -'---- . ~ �e ^ ^ ' -- ' ^ ° m ^ 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 13 CHECK N0. DATE - - -- -- AMOUNT- . - - - -- -- - ___VENDOR - - - -- - -- _ -_. -- ._ITEM- DESCRIP -T -ION ACCOUNT --- NO- .-- _INV- .- .M- P- .O. - -N MESSAGE 325.00 • 124725 04/22/87 180.00 CHEMSEARCH GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 180.00 • v 124726 04/22/87 94.00 MRPA CONF & SCHOOLS 10- 4202- 600 -60 94.00 • • 124727 04/22/87 26.60 SYSTEM SUPPLY INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 040515 26.60 • • 124728 04/22/87 520.00 THE BUREAU OF NATL DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 124728 04/22/87 120.00 THE BUREAU OF NATL DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 • - - ---- - - - --- ---- - - - - -- - - -- 640- .00- + - -- - - -- - -- -- - - _ -- ------------ - - - - -- -- ------- - - - - -- -- _ - --- - -- 124729 04/22/87 15.19- COPY EQUIPMENT INC CORRECTION 10- 4901 - 260 -26 • -124729 - 04/22/87 - - - -- - - - - -- --15. 19 - - - -- COPY - EQUIPMENT INC _-CORRECTION - .... - -_- 10-4901-260-26- 124729 04/22/87 11519.00 COPY EQUIPMENT INC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 260 -26 155204 124729 04/22/87 1,519.00 COPY EQUIPMENT INC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 260 -26 155204 • - 124729 - - -- 04/22/87-------- - - - - -1 , 519. 00- - - -- - - COPY EQUIPMENT INC - - - -- CORRECTION - - -- ±.0 -4901- 260 -26 - - - - - - -- -. _ _ 1,519.00 • • -- 124730 - - 04/22/87 - - -- 96, 00 - -- MINNESOTA -GOLF ASSO -- - - - - -- GEN .- SUPP-LIES 27 -4504- 664 -66_ _- - - - -_. -____- _ 96.00 • • 124731 - -- 04/22/87 -- - - - -- - - - -- 52.00---- - - - - -- CARL -- SHANNON -- _-- - - - -.- .__ .BOOKS - - -- 1 -0 -4202- 490- 49---- _. -_ -- _ 52.00 • • - - -- 124732 - -- 04/22/87 -- - 130.86 -- STEBGO- METALS INC- - -__ -- -GEN - SUPPLIES- 23-4504-6t2-61_42636_____..___. _ 124732 04/27/87 42.08 STEBGO METALS INC CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4568- 611 -61 42972 172.94 • • 124733 04/22/87 26.10 WASTE MANAGEMENT RUBBISH REMOVAL 23- 4250 - 612 -61 26.10 + • 124734 04/23/87 469.50 CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR PARATS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 6025 124734 04/23/87 145.50 CONTACT MOBILE COMM REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 6025 • - - - - -- --- - -- - -- 615. 00 - - ; - -- - -- 124735 04/23/87 75.00 LOLA EDMAN SERVICES 27- 4201- 662 -66 9167 • - -- ---- - - - - -- - - - -- 75..-00-+---.---------- - - - - -- 124736 04/23/87 14.56 LYNDALE HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 • - 124737 04/23/87 15.00 J HERBERT DECKER SHOVEL 10 -4248- 644 -64 • 124738 04/23/87 105.00 TWIN CITIES READER ADVERTISING 50- 4214- 822 -82 • 124738 - 04/23/87 -- - - - - -- - - -- 3:33 - -- -- -TWIN- CITIES READER--- - - - - -- ADVERTISING - - -50- 4214 - 822 -82 - - - - -- 124738 04/23/87 105.00 TWIN CITIES READER ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 842 -84 124738 04/23/87 3.33 TWIN CITIES READER ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 - -. - 124738 - 04/23/87- 105. -00 TWIN - CITIES READER ADVERT -ISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 124738 04/23/87 3.34 TWIN CITIES READER ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 862 -86 ' 325.00 • 1987 C1iY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER OS -04 -87 PAGE 14 CHECK -NO- DATE­ -- -- - - - - -- AMOUNT---------- - - - - -- VENDOR - -- -- - - -I TEM -DESCR IPTION- ACCOUNT- NO -I NV--11 -P : O. N MESSAGE rrrrrr - - - - -... -- __. -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- rrr -CKS 124742 04/27/87 12,309.00 TILLSON BUS 6 EQUIP AR /MIS 10 -1139- 000 -00 11372 - -- - -- - --12,309; 00- +- - -- 124743 04/27/87 51.25 KARI MEIER MAINTANANCE 23- 4120 - 612 -61 - - - -- -- - - 51 .25- 1247.44 04/27/87 100.00 HEATHER HENKEL MAINTANANCE 23- 4120- 612 -61 -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -1 00 . 00 + - - -- - 124745 04/27/87 7.00 MINNESOTA CRAFT ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 - - - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - -7: 00 + - -- 124746 04/27/87 25.00 DIANA HEDGES PINS 23- 4504 - 611 -61 124746 - - - 04/27/87 - 21 :96- - -DIANA HEDGES - - - - -- - SUPPLIES - - - -- -23- 4504 - 612 -61 - -- 124746 04/27/87 15.98 DIANA HEDGES OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516- 611 -61 , 62.94 + 124747 04/27/87 637.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 , 637.00 + 124748 - 04/27/87 123.00 RAY GORMLEY INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 , 123.00 • 124749 04/27/87 480.00 SUSAN FRAME INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 , 480.00 + 124750 04/27/87 224.00 DOROTHY OOLAND INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 224.00 + 124751 04/27/87 288.00 MONICA RUDQUIST INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 288.00 + 124752 04/27/87 204.00 BESTY BRYANT INSTRUCTOR 23 -4201- 611 -61 , 204.00 + 124753 04/27/87 144.00 CY TURNBLADH INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 144.00 + 124754 04/27/87 24.00 HELEN ZABEL INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 24.00 + 124755 04/27/87 30.00 DAVID DOUGHMAN INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 30.00 + 124756 04/27/87 132.00 BILL COLE INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201-611 -61 132.00 + 124757 04/27/87 120.00 DOROTHY HALL INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201 - 611 -61 - { 120.00 + 124758 04/27/87 60.00 BERNADETTE DALY INSTRUCTOR 23- 4201- 611 -61 �., 60.00 + - - - - -- 124768 - - - 04/27/87- 31-.-37 RUBENSTEIN S- ZIFF---- ._CRAFT SUPPLIES - -- 23- 4588 - 6 1 1 -6 1- 1987 CITY OF EDINA 04/27/87 CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 15 CHECK -NO. -DATE --- ----- - - - - -- AMOUNT----------- __ - - -,- VENDOR------------------------ .I -TEM -- DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO. -INV.- N- P. -O.- N MESSAGE 124759 - .._04/27/87 - -- - ____ - ____._96.00 -- _------- EVIE-- HOLMQUIST - INSTRUCTOR - -- -23 -- 4201-611 -61- -- PIP FABRICATORS INC SIGNS d POSTS 96.00 124760 -- - - 04/27/87--- ---- —._ 1 12.00- -- MARGARET - GUST------- --INSTRUCTOR- -23- 420.1-- 6- 1- 1-- 61- _----- - -_ -_- 04/27/87 400.00 112.00 AR MIS 10 -1139- 000 -00 124761- - - -- 04/27/87 ------- - - - - -- 355.00------- - - -. -- MARGARET -.MC DOWELL---- - - - - -- INSTRUCTOR- 23- 4201 - 611- 61------- - - - - -- - -.- 124771 355.00 822.90 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CONT REPAIRS 124762 - -- 04/27/87 - - -- - -- 269 .00---- - - - - -- BILL-- DIETRICHSON INSTRUCTOR - 23=4201-- 611- 61 . 269.00 - 124763 - - - -- 04/27/87--- .-- - - - - -- -384- .00---- - - - - -- JEAN-- GRAPP----------- .----- - - - - -- INSTRUCTOR - - - - -- 23=4201 -61- 1--61 - -- - -- - 384.00 - -- 124773 - - -- 124764 - - - - -- 04/27/87-- - - - - -- -- 132- 00-- - - - - -- HARR -Y -- HEIM - - - - -- - - -- INSTRUCTOR 23- 420.6- 1 -1 - -b1 - -- -- - - . 132.00 * y - - -- - 124765-- - - - - -- 04/27/87 -- - - -- 660 -. 00 - - -- MARIAN-- ALSTAD------- - -.. -- INSTRUCTOR - -- 23- 420 -1 -61 t-- 61 - - -- - - - - -. - - -- - - 23- 4248- 612 -61 03862 _ - -- - 660.00 • 04/27/87 61.20 MPLS WELDERS SUPP CO ---- 1247b6 -- - -- 04/27/87- -- 690 -.00 - - - --- KAY -S - -- SCHLOSSER -- .---- INSTRIICTR - - -. 23- 4241--_6- 1 -1=6 -1 + 690.00 124775 04/27/87 _ 124767 - -- - - - - -- 04/27/87 - - -- 60, - ..- . 00.-- .__.._- J. THOMAS- NELSON - -- .. ___- INSTRUCTR-----------_23- 4201- 61 - -1 -61 ----- - - - - -- 8,280.00 60.00 - - - - -- 124768 - - - 04/27/87- 31-.-37 RUBENSTEIN S- ZIFF---- ._CRAFT SUPPLIES - -- 23- 4588 - 6 1 1 -6 1- 0 658 6 5-- .- - - - - -- 124768 04/27/87 10.78 RUBENSTEIN E ZIFF COST OF COMMODITIES 23- 4624 - 613 -61 - -__- 066152 42.15 124769 04/27/87 912.69 PIP FABRICATORS INC SIGNS d POSTS 10- 4542 - 325 -30 912.69 124770 04/27/87 400.00 MINNESOTA VALLEY AR MIS 10 -1139- 000 -00 400.00 124771 04/27/87 822.90 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 9034 822.90 - -- 124773 - 04/27/8-- 7------ - - - - -- ._15.00-- ---- -- STATE - TREASURER - -- - - -- CERTIFICATION -40- 431 -0- 809- 80--------- - - - - -- -- 15.00 - 124774 -- -- 04/27/87- - -- - -- 217 -. 88 - - - -- MPLS- WELDERS SUPP -CO -- CONT - -REPAIRS - 23- 4248- 612 -61 03862 _ - -- - 124774 04/27/87 61.20 MPLS WELDERS SUPP CO CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 -- 04164 279.08 + 124775 04/27/87 8,280.00 ASSO WOOD PRODUCTS MENS CLUB 27 -2237- 000 -00 8,280.00 • 124776 04/27/87 48.15 AMERICABLE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 79089 48.15 V • • • • 1987 CIrY OF EDINA CHECK k�wISTER 05 -04 -87 eAGE 16 CHECK NO.- DATE - - - - - - -- AMOUNT---------- - - - - -- VENDOR - - - -- - -- ITEM DESCRIPTION- ACCOUNT- NO —INV -N -P:O. M MESSAGE 124777 - - 04/27/87 - - - 95.00 - -ASPEN PUBLISHERS INC ADVISOR -- 10 -4204- 440 -44 - - -- - 95.00 124778 - - -- 04/27/87 ----- - - - - -- 270.00 -- - - - - -- LANDSCAPE 6 TURF - - - - -- - GEN- SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 2557 - -- - 270.00 124779 -- 04/29/87-- - -- - -- -- 160. 65 - - - -- DESLAURIERS -INC - - -- - -LUMBER-- - 1 0- 4604 - 260 -26 15191 - 160.65 * -- 124780- - - - - -- 04/29/87 -- --- - - - - -- -89.00 --- - - - - -- JOYCE REPYA- - -- - -- COMPUTER-CLASS- 0- 4201 -- 280- 28 - - - - -- - 89.00 s -- 124781 - -- - - -- 04/29/87 -- - - -- - -- 25.00 -- -- D-C HEY - COMPANY -- --- - - GEN--SUPPLIES -- -10 -4504- 133 -12 -- 032571 - 25.00 - 124782----04/29/87 - 135.83 -- MOLLIE- PAULSON — - -- ART -WORK -SOLD 23 3625- 000 -00- - - - -- - 135.83 * r - 124783 - ---- 04/29/87--- - - - - -- 88.00- - -- -SUSAN HIBBS - - - - -- - POSTAGE— -23- 4290 - 611-- 61 —- - -- - r 88.00 * - -- 124784 -- -- 04/29/87- -- 1,017:50- MINNESOTA -UC FUND - -- INSURANCE- ' -0- 4160- 51 -0 -51 ----- 1,017.50 - 124785 -- 04/29/87 -- -- - - - - -1 07.1 0- - -- -- MN SUB NEWSPAPER---------- - ADVERTISING - -- 10-4212-510-51 -- - -- - 124785 04/29/87 32.17 MN SUB NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 124785 04/29/87 32.17 MN SUB NEWSPAPER ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 842 -84 - 124785— 04/29/87 -- 32 -16- -MN- SUB - NEWSPAPER - -- ADVERT -ISING 50- 424-4- 862 -86- - 203.60 124786 -- -- 04/29/87 -6.95 ----- --GAIL SIMONS- - - - -- - -- - REFUND - - - -- 10- 3350 - 000- 00- - - - - -- 124786 04/29/87 .42 GAIL SIMONS REFUND TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 7.37 124787 04/29/87 240.00 CLEAN FLO LAB INC INDIANHEAD LAKE 10- 2242 - 000 -00 3647 ' 124787 04/29/87 37.00 CLEAN FLO LAB INC INDIANYHEAD LAKE 10- 2242 - 000 -00 3573 - - -- - - - -- -- -277 00 * - - - -- 124788 04/29/87 660.00 MN DOWNHOLE SERVICSE CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 255 - -- - - -- -- 660-.0 0 - * - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- - 124789 04/29/87 6.96 BYERLYS CATERING MEETING EXPENSES 10- 4206 - 100 -10 3080 ' 124790 04/29/87 12,199.00 JOE GREUPNER APRIL LESSONS 27- 4100 - 661 -66 _- - - -- - - - - - -- -- -- - - - -- 12-,- 199:00- *----- - - - - -- - - -- - -- ' 124791 04/29/87 380.00 BOWLER COMPANY CONSTRUCTION 27- 1330 - 000 -00 71414 - .. - ----- .. - - - -- - - - - -- 380:00 *-- - - - -.. _.._ - - -- - - -- - ----- --- ' 124792 04/29/87 98.89 MARJORIE MULLIGAN AMBULANCE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 ' 124793 04/29/87 111.00 FRIDEN ALCATEL SERICE CONTRACTS 10- 4288 - 510 -51 + 1987 "CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 17 - CHECK - NO -.- DATE -- - - -- AMOUNT------------ - - - -.. - -- VENDOR - - -- -ITEM- DESCRIP -T -ION - ACCOUNT- NO.- INV.- B- P -.O.- N MESSAGE 111.00 124794 04/29/87 173.44 XEROX CORP SERVICE CONTRACTS 10- 4288 - 510 -51 173.44 s 124795 04/29/87 20.00 BOB KOJETIN REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4204 - 600 -60 20.00 s 124796 04/29/87 243.98 DIANA HEDGES REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 627 -62 243.98 s 124797 04/29/87 66.75 ROOT 0 MATIC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 66.75 s 124798 04/29/87 173.22 FISCO GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 440 -44 173.22 • 124799 04/29/87 164.30 LEROY LISK CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 440 -44 164.30 124800 04/29/87 341.41 FAIRVIEW COMM HOSP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 286515 341.41 124801 04/29/87 3,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290- 510 -51 3,000.00 124802 04/29/87 114.00 GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 114.00 s . 124803 04/29/87 10.00 GORDON STUART REFUND 10- 4202 - 123 -12 10.00 + 124804 04/29/87 125.00 GOVERNMENT TRAINING REGISTRATION 10- 4206 - 140 -14 125.00 • 124805 04/29/87 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB COFFEE 10- 4504- 506 -50 230.00 s . 124806 04/29/87 49.50 AUTO SPRINKLER PERMIT 10- 3112-000 -00 49.50 • 124807 04/29/87 84.38 _ CASHIER FLOWERS 10 -4500- 500 -50 84.38 w 124808 04/29/87 405.00 ERIC ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4201 - 500 -50 124808 04/29/87 36.75 ERIC ANDERSON MILEAGE 10 -4208- 500 -50 - - -- - - - - - -- 441- .75 -w- - - -- 124809 04/29/87 180.00 ANOKA SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 440 -44 • - - -- -- - - - 180,.00 __s_.. 124810 04/29/87 44.50 THE PRINT SHOP PROGRAMS 10- 4500-500 -50 124811 04/29/87 21.00 ROXANNE BORRELL MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 510 -51 vyar ` . or soImA C*scm .-.IoTsn ns-n*-o^ /Aos vo | - -cxsnK mo.-oATs --------*noomT-- vsmoon-------'------zTsm-osoCnzpTzOm-------AoCOwmr-mO--Imv,-* p_o. w nsoaAos � ' a1.nn * ` 12*81e 04/29/87 118.80 np* xmounTRzsw souzp m*zmr 10-4e7*-4e0-*2 ^ 118.80 * � 124813 04/e9/87 18.50 AUTO 000mn souIp n*zmT 10-4e7*-420-4e asee ' 1e*813 o*/ay/oT 18.50 Au7n wouwo smuIp mAzmr 10-4e74-4e0-42 asaa .-' --' ---------- 37 .0 0 -*----- - ' �------- -- ---'-'----�--- -_-_--'-__---_ 1e4814 nw/ep/oT e39.18 nnmozmooALs p*nn msw ouppLr 10-4504-*70-47 ___-_ ' �y.vo-*---------------- -----'--'--------- _----_-_- 124815 04/e9m87 e04.*0 MpLw *sAL7* ospT asmvzcsa 10-4e01-4e0-*e 5e98 ----- ---'----'---'- --e04.*0-*-- ,. ~ 1 124816 04/29/87 490.00 nsrno AREA snsnmsmCr wsmmsL osnv 10-4e78-*70-47 .' -------�- p�nw��' -------'-�-�— _�� � ~'.. 1e4817 u*/an/wr ees.no vsomCo mspwzR pwnro 40-4540-805-80 3e83 ��----'-- '------- -- ees�ww-*---'------'-- - ----------- ----'--- - ----�__---'__-___--_- ^. 1e4818 ow/ey/wr 195.00 *npm Tnss osnozCs TREE nsnovAL 10-1300-870-18 +-------''-----�� 195-00__* ---'------ _____ - -� ----' �. ~| 12+819 04/29/e7 70s.16 s mAvzo ocoOsm CnmvsmrIom sw-+eue-w*n-o* _- _- _---_-_--_---- 5`-16-*--------'�---------�---------'---- - ' __-�----_----_'__- � 1e48e0 04/29/87 1^131.34 pno rsC* Annnnso p AnmumIrzom 10-457e-420-*2 860e44 ' _-__-________-_ -3 124821 04/e9/87 sn.nn nsrmn p*Ows osmvzcsy 10-4901-4e0-4e --- ------' sn,�w-*-------------'----' - - _--____--_-_-__-__--- - ` 1e48ee 0*/29/87 3s.10 sozww POLICE mwo 10-4e06-430-42 .----' ' --------'-' '- �s.��-*------'----------- '---_-----_-__-' � 1e48e3 04/e9/87 270.00 pT*C TUITION vn-*ene-wan-ws ,. _ --_ '_---__-- � �o.no-*-------------- - -------------------- -_-__'_--'_____'__'_ _ 1e48e* u+/en/oT eeo.nw cwLzBns pnsan TuTTznm 10 -�enm-*en-wa ---------' eo,*�—�'------- —�--- __�- _ - ' 1e*8es 0*/e9/87 as.nn w*w*zmwrow Cmzns wwowCnzprznm 10-4e04-4e0-*e . __� -- __-_�__-_ -' s.ow-*------�- --'----- '--------------'- -__-_- -__- _--_-___ 124826 04/e9/87 6.87 BRADY oppzcswAns osm owppLzso 10-450*-420-4e aasw -ve*oaa ---0*/e9/87 1-1.09 -------omAuv--mrFzCsu*ns---------Gsm--SuppLxsS 10-4sw4-43*-*2 26sII--- -' 17.96 * 1e*8e7- ----04/29/87 O,00- -N L*mo-ouwzmswS'oonn----souzp-nAz 7*-*e0-4e r3193'-- �. '-' 30.00 * -- ~~~~~`------------ --�***-cwo +wa-3 ~ �p � � � . 1987 ►CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -04 -87 PAGE 19 CHECK NO DATE— - -- AMOUNT---------- .._____ _- __VENDOR -- - ____.-- I -TEM- .DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT- NO- -INV.- B_P- -.O. -M MESSAGE 24.05 s s * * * ** * * *-CKS 188,099.20 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - - -- -- - - -- - - - - - - -- 6- ,696.95-- - - -_ -- -. -- FUND 23 TOTAL -- -_ - - -- ART CENTER -- _ —_ -- _- - 74.00 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 263.80 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND FUND 27 TOTAL - GOLF COURSE FUND_ 786.30 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 195.67 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- 230,478.23 -. -- - -. __ FUND 40 TOTAL - -._. _ __ - UTILITY_FUND 2,644.37 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 1,803.09 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 458,373.85 TOTAL - - - - - .. .. - — - - - - -- -- --- - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - -- - -- -COMPUTER - CHECKS' 5 - #-- 7-7632 - THRU - —. 77842