HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-06-01_COUNCIL PACKETe
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JUNE 1, 1987
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF MAY 18, 1987
.II. AMENDMENT OF JERRYS'. ENTERPRISES AGREEMENT - GRANDVIEW
ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - Robert Buresh
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of May 18, 1987
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk..
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/4 favorable rollcall vote to
pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition.
A. Permanent Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter - Improvement No.
P -BA -278 Link Road from Eden Av to Vernon Av (Contd from 5/18/87)
B. Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -38- Olinger Blvd from Tracy Av to Bredesen Park
C. Sidewalk Improvement No. 5 -39- West 70th Street from Valley View Rd to
France Av
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats,
Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required.to pass. Final
Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable
rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Lot Divisions
* 1. 7700 Marth Court - 5901 Long Brake Trail
* 2. 6537 -39 McCauley Trail
* 3. 6545 McCauley Trail - 6301 Timber Trail
* 4. 7015 -17 Lynmar Lane
* 5. 5101 Vernon Avenue
B. Set Hearing Dates (6/15/87)
* 1. Final Development Plan - Building Expansion - Edina Theater, 3911 W.
50th Street
2. Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion - Normandale Lutheran
Church, 6100 Normandale Rd
* 3. Amendments to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan
Agenda - Edina City Council
Page Two
V. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Waiver of
Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required
to pass.
A. .Second Reading
1. Ordinance No. 825 -A18 - An Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to Allow
Curbside Pick -up of Leaves and Grass Clippings
2. Ordinance No. 711 -A4 - An Amendment to Ordinance No. 711 to Allow
Curbside Pick -up of Leaves and Grass Clippings in the Morningside Area
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Tape Recordings - Ron Weeks
VII. AWARD OF BIDS
* A. Two Dump Boxes
* B. Utility Truck Body
VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Council Liaison Assignments (Contd from 5/18/87)
B. Goose Control Project
C. Local No. 49 Contract
D. ACE Award
E. Report - Swensons-Ice Cream
F. City Well Water Program
G. Request for Easement - Northwestern Bell Telephone
H. Club On -Sale Liquor License Renewals
I. Amendment of Jerrys' Enterprises.Agreement - Grandview
IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
* A. Petition for Construction of Noise and Sight Barrier - T.H. 100 between
West 44th St and Minnehaha Creek Bridge
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS -OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
A. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Annual Tour - June 9
XII. FINANCE
* A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 6/1/87: General Fund $331,.294.14,
Art Center $5,922.64, Capital Fund $6,996.40, Swimming Pool Fund $5,477.65,
Golf Course Fund'$16,992.83, Recreation Center Fund $939.56, Gun Range Fund
$1,149.17, Utility Fund $238,288.10, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,912.23,
Construction Fund $5,419.45, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $300.00. Total
$618,692.17.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
June 9 - 12 LMC Annual Conference Mayo Civic Center - Rochester
Mon
June
15
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
July
6
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
Mon
July
20
Regular
Council
Meeting
7:00
p.m.
Council
Room
MINUTES
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MAY 18, 1987
Answering.rollcall were Commissioners Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney.
MINUTES of the H.R.A. Meeting of May 4, 1987 were approved as submitted by
.motion of Commissioner Turner, seconded by Commissioner Smith.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR ICE RESURFACER AND TRACTOR FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK. Manager Rosland
presented the .bid of Frank J. Zamboni & Company, Inc. at $9,000.00 for an ice
resurfacer and tractor for Edinborough Park, noting that this was the only supplier.
Motion of Commissioner Richards was seconded by Commissioner Turner for award of
bid to Frank J. Zamboni.& Company, Inc. at $9,000.00 for an ice resurfacer and
tractor.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR EDINBOROUGH PARK KIOSK. Manager Rosland presented the bid of
D & M Iron Works-at $9,475.00 for a kiosk for Edinborough Park. Motion of
Commissioner Smith was seconded by.Commissioner Turner for award of bid to
D & M Iron Works at $9,475.00 for a kiosk for Edinborough Park.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the H.R.A. Agenda, the meeting was adjourned
by motion of Commissioner Richards, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion
carried.
Executive Director
510 NORTH CENTRAL LIFE TOWER
445 MINNESOTA STREET
ST: PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 '
(612) 227 -5017
340 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
P. 0. BOX 646
ROCHESTER, MINNESOTA 55903
(507)266 -3156
315 FIRST NATIONAL BANE BUILDING
WAYZATA, MINNESOTA 55391
(612)475 -0373
350 PARE AVENUE
NEW YORE, NEW YORE 10022
(212) 415 -9200
BY MESSENGER
Mr. Gordon L. Hughes
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
DoRsEY & WHITNEY
A PA @TNC @9H IP INCLUDING PPoP99910N.L CO@POHwT10N9
2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402
(612) 340-2600
TELEX 29 -0605
TELECOPIER (612) 340 -2868
ROBERT O. FLOTTEN, P.A.
(612) 340 -2694
May 29, 1987
HRA II &
Council VIII.I.
201 DAVIDSON BUILDING
6 THIRD STREET NORTH
OR EAT FALLS, MONTANA 59401
(406)727-3632
1200 FIRST INTERSTATE CENTER
401 NORTH 3191 STREET
P. 0. BOX 7186
BILLINGS, MONTANA 59103
(406)252-3800
30 RUE LA BOETIE
75006 PARIS, FRANCE
011-334) 43-59-13 -65
OH- 33(1)45-62 -32 -50
Re: Jerry's Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement
Dear Gordon:
I enclose a copy of an Amendment to the Easement and
Parking Ramp Agreement among the City of Edina, the HRA and
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. (the "Agreement "). The Agreement
provides that Jerry's will pay 200 of the cost of the parking
ramp and that the cost will be paid by a special assessment. The
purpose of the Amendment is to clarify the intention of the
parties that the parking ramp cost be paid by special assessment
rather than by some other means.
In the Amendment, Jerry's waives its rights to notice
of, to a public hearing, to object and to appeal the special
assessment.
I understand that this matter will be brought on before
the City Council and the HRA on June 1.
V y my yours,
Robert O. Flotten
ROF /gv
Enclosure
cc: Thomas S. Erickson, Esq.
r
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT FOR
PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT AND
EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT is made as of May 28, 1987 by and among
the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the
"City "), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the
State of Minnesota (the "HRA ") and JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a
Minnesota corporation ( "Jerry's ").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the HRA and Jerry's have entered into a
Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of February 1, 1987
(the "Redevelopment Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, the City, the HRA and Jerry's have entered
into an. Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as `of
February 1, 1987 (the "Easement Agreement "); and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Redevelopment
Agreement and the Easement Agreement as provided herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and
the mutual obligations of the parties hereto, each party hereby
covenants and agrees with the other as follows:
1. Paragraph 1.A. of the Easement Agreement is amended
to provide that the City shall (rather than "may ") levy a special
assessment on Jerry's Property, Tracts 2 and 3 (which property is
legally described on Exhibit A hereto) to pay 20% of the cost of
the HRA Public Improvements.
2. The Easement Agreement is further amended by adding
a new Paragraph 1.C. as follows:
"C. Jerry's hereby consents to the levy by the
City of the special assessments referred to in
Paragraphs 1.A. and 1.B, hereof and waives all rights
to notice (mailed, published or otherwise) of, all
rights to a public hearing relating to, and all rights
to appeal from, or object to, any such special
assessments levied by the City. Jerry's also waives
any and all other rights which it may have pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, any successor statute
and any other law or ordinance relating to such special
assessments."
3. Section 6.3(b) of the Redevelopment Agreement is
amended to reflect the amendments to the Easement Agreement
contained in Paragraphs 1 and 2 hereof.
4. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Easement
Agreement and the Redevelopment Contract. shall be and remain in
full force and effect.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
these presents to be duly executed the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its Mayor
And
Its Clerk
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF EDINA,
MINNESOTA
By
Its (Vice] Chairman
And
Its Secretary
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC.
By
Its President
STATE! OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of June, 1987, by and
the and of the CITY
OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of said
corporation.
-2-
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) ss.
COUNTY OF'HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of June, 1987 by and ,
the and of the HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and
corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of
said corporation.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me
this day of June, 1987,' by r the
of JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota
corporation, on behalf of said corporation.
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
Dorsey & Whitney
2200 First Bank Place East
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
-3-
J
EXHIBIT A
Tract 2
Lots 19, 20, 21.and 22, Block 3, Grand View Heights, according
to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County
Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Tract 3
Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, Block 3, and Lots
17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 4, Grand View Heights, according
to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County
Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that portion
thereof taken for highway purposes.
That part of Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, Block 4, Grand View
Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of West Half
of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining Lots 13 to 15 inclusive,
lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue
of the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said
Lot 15, all of.which lies Easterly of a line parallel with
and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway
No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record
in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County.
That part of Lot 16 lying East of a line drawn from a point
on the South line thereof distant 28 feet East of the Southwest
corner of said Lot 16 to a point on the North line of said
lot distant 47 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof,
Block 4, "Grand View Heights" and that part of the West Half
of the adjoining vacated Summit Avenue lying between the
extensions across it of the North and South lines of said
Lot 16, according to the plat thereof on file or of record
in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County.
s•r cur 'a
NEW 8624 N
` \ CLOSE 0 0 BITUMINOUS
MOVE EYIS P. C.
RE CURB € IIN —� VERNON AVE
E� 86'6 _Ar tur r ° 17'' 12''
a N yM 00°
tul 7N3TAL V LLE R °330.61' —
♦ MATCH TER SA- t T
■ ■. ®4 °�. EN7RANC .• 220 ' _
• 1BB gg 8? A� \ 0■u+ PoQ`, r. - c cJ. Q•. ■. 96 SAr CUT
�• •k \ / • ♦ 30 30.6 '3
A. ®•k p 4/,26. a cJ. •IST
30'R IS'' _ .1511 26. 0 n RL
\ V \O Ig• — S • 8616
. °•r 4' O ~ h- 107.08
�? \ n,• 4" Co +
llll�_
20919 ,O�gi OP1v •l° rm 2 m
� \ � � 3 e° .wT•..a,� 1 \o
a °� \
EDEN AVE. CONS'. P.O.T. I1 5.29 • / \ \\
\ i DO� * + • *••■ LINK RD. P.O.C. 19• .1
� P/ C \ O O °• a E LINK RD.
R • 215.00'
° J� j \ • • 232.6
T 6'
\ f
"El
a/ pb� �•� \ n •�
• V
. 20 �X4
sJj Qt• Qo
\ 40 P
l . F,
P. 0 6ti\g \OA r•66 �
- �O • \�ary6�00 C't .�
�: - / O ■\09ti ,rte Q �aQ
ti f �
L
R
Fed. P
..u, m.... .......
VERNON AVE
A5.6 B pu.x .....u.x A.r. O..x
B'B2
� \ u
� u
O — 107.09
a
r
7 Af
r.' t
/ ruxs.x.
e
P
frt
f
3
REV NO
_�_yy11�..�,��y�. k✓
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 18,1987
Answering rollcall were Members Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 4. 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made
by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the
Regular Council Meeting of May 4, 1987.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -278 CONTINUED TO 6/1/87. Engineer
Hoffman recalled that the public hearing on Street Improvement No. P -BA -278 (Link
Road) had been continued from the meeting of April 20, 1987. He advised that
staff has.continued to work with Hennepin County and Superamerica over design and
access issues. Staff would recommend continuation of the hearing to June 1, 1987
to allow additional time for discussions to occur which could result in
development of a plan acceptable to all parties. Motion of Member Turner was
,seconded by Member Smith to continue the public hearing on Street Improvement No..
P -BA -278 (Link Road) to the Council Meeting of June 1, 1987.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
FINAL REZONING TO PRD -4 AND FINAL PLAT (VERNON OAKS) APPROVED FOR NAMRON
CORPORATION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen stated that the subject property is
generally located north of Vernon Avenue and west of-Villa Way. At the meeting of
April 20, 1987 the Council considered the proponent's overall development plans in
support of a request for final - rezoning to PRD -4 and final plat approval. The
Council took action to refer the matter back to the Community Development and
Planning Commission to review their logic and rationale for recommending approval
of the density for the proposed project. Mr. Larsen recalled that the project is-
a 135 -unit three story apartment building for the site. The Planning Commission
at its meeting of April 29, 1987 heard from staff as to why staff recommended the
density at 135 units as being appropriate for the site. The Planning Commission
also heard from the developer and from neighbors and their representatives on a
variety of issues concerning this development. Following that testimony the
Planning Commission voted unanimously to re- affirm its recommendation of approval
to the Council for final rezoning and final plat, subject to the conditions set
out by staff in their report. The conditions were: 1) subdivision dedication
based on a land value of $330,000, 2) an executed Developer's Agreement, 3) a.
recorded Proof of Parking Agreement, and 4) an executed assessment agreement for
cost of possible signalization. Mr. Larsen added that, following the meeting of
the Planning Commission, the developer has supplied some additional information in
the form of graphics. He has updated the cross sections to show how the
development of the site will relate to surrounding properties; has supplied an
aerial photo that shows the location of the site, the proposed building and
distances from some of.the adjacent residential uses. Mr. Larsen said-that Norman
Bjornnes, proponent, was present to explain his new information. Mr. Bjornnes
.stated that the proposed project is 56% less dense than the Vernon Terrace project
being constructed now and is 36% less dense than the site allows. It is 21% less
dense than Interlachen Court across the driveway, and about identical with Highland
Villa to the north. The density now is about 18.9 units per acre and represents a
balance of a number of factors. A major factor was to maintain as much of the -
site intact as possible. He pointed out that this design leaves about 60% of the
site in green space. In response to the question why not "12 units per acre or
some other number, Mr. Bjornnes said that in dealing with a lower density the
result generally is much less green space. For example, their study of a 12 unit
density would have resulted in approximately 35% of the site being left as green
space. He said the design now presented represents a compromise and will leave a
number of trees varying in height from 30 to 6.5 feet which will ring the
perimeter. For the last few weeks they have met with various neighbors of the
project and have attempted to identify those areas of privacy which will have the
least impact. With the help of a landscape architect a survey of the site was
completed of the existing trees so that the heights and types could be integrated
into the sectionals and aerial photo in order to develop a better perspective of
how the completed development will fit into the site. Mr. Bjornnes explained that
the top of the roof is approximately at 962 feet; the top of the third floor where
it intersects with the roof soffit is about 950 feet. If you begin at the Villa
Way driveway and walk along the Vernon Avenue side of the project the tree top
heights of the trees that will be saved run from 950 to 995 feet. Beginning at
the southwest corner of the site, near Hansen Road/Vernon, the trees along the
west side run from about 945 to 985 feet. The trees along the north side which
abut the Villa Way project run from approximately 975 to 985 feet. The point
being that with respect to the leafy trees, the entire building will be below
those in varying levels. The completed building as shown on the sectional is
roughly 30 feet lower than the existing buildings of Highland Villa and
Interlachen Court. Mr. Bjornnes said they next considered what could be done to
add additional screening during the winter months along the west side and talked
to Mr. Jonason and Mrs. Smith who are closest to the development. He said they
have also talked to NSP who has an easement of 50 feet for their high voltage line
along the project's west border. NSP has.said that Namron could use their land
for: potential additional screening by adding berming with coniferous trees on top.
This would be subject to NSP's review and would have to be within certain limits
so as to not interfere with the high voltage lines. Mr. Bjornnes showed revised
sectionals of the project to give everyone more perspective on the sight lines.
He pointed out that the proposed additional screening should effectively block out
any view of the proposed building from the adjacent neighbors. He said they want
to be as private as possible for the benefit of the neighbors as well as the
people who will live in the building. Mr. Bjornnes concluded that they have met
the seven conditions of the ordinance as originally approved and that they are
willing as good neighbors to do some more, to take care of the trees and to work
with the signalization agreement. He noted that.Nick Palaia, chief design
architect; and Alan Hipps, landscape architect, were present to also respond to
questions. Mr. Bjornnes added that a.fair number of letters of support have been
sent to the Council from residents who believe in the project and Namron's ability
to prepare a project that will be a source of pride to the City. Mayor Courtney
then asked for public comment. Bill Mahoney, 5309 Ayrshire Boulevard, read a
prepared statement on behalf of more than 350 signers from the Highlands
neighborhood of a petition proposing that the density of the project be reduced to
12 units per acre which is within the guidelines for this zoning request. This
could be accomplished by removing the third story of the present proposal and
would leave everything else that.Namron has included for siting and saving of
green space. It would not deny Namron the opportunity to build within the
guidelines set forth but would also allow the residents' concerns to be heard and
acted upon by the Council who should be guided by overall judgement to these
subjective concerns as well as the hard line specifications to be met by a
developer. Mr. Mahoney concluded that the Council then be guided accordingly.
Connor Schmid, 4711 Meadow Road, stated he was appearing on behalf of Mr. and Mrs.
L. J. Jonason, 5300 Glenbrae Circle, and Wilma Smith, 5304 Glenbrae Circle.
He stated that the developer has presented a number of changes, graphics,
illustrations and representations with regard to elevations, tree height, etc. He
urged the Council to examine that detail and to give the residents and his clients
an opportunity to look into that to see what it really means. He presented the
points set out in his letter to the Council of May 12, 1987 as follows: 1) that
the Planning Commission gave little indication of an intent to re- examine any of
the factors which bear upon the question of degree of intensity, 2) that he
questioned whether his clients had received notice of the preliminary hearing in
August, 1987, 3) that the drawings submitted by the proponent did not meet the
specific requirement of the Zoning Ordinance that the developer show the property
within 100 feet of the border of the property to be rezoned, 4) that the elevation
diagram does not identify the sections through which it was drawn, 5) that at the
preliminary hearing other apartment and commercial development for the Grandview
area which are significant contributors to both traffic and density problems in
the general proximity of the proposed rezoning were not fully considered, 6) the
impact of the site's irregular shape has not been considered, 7) that no
consideration appears to have been given to the principle of buffering by stepping
down densities in areas which approach single family residential areas, and 8)
that little original mature tree cover will be left and that he questioned the
developer's statement that there will be $1 million worth of landscaping and the
storm water drainage . "benefits" to the area. In.conclusion Mr. Schmid said his
clients were willing to accept the minimum high density of 12 units per acre for
the proposed development. He asked that the Council give this matter careful
reconsideration and review the concern of the Highlands residents and other single
family residents who will be impacted by this decision. Member Smith raised
these questions: 1) whether the Jonasons and Wilma Smith had been sent notice at
the time of the preliminary hearing, 2) clarification of the definitions in the
Comprehensive Plan of medium density and high density and why the subject property
was identified for high density, and 3) if conditions, i.e. landscaping, can be
imposed with approval of the project. Mr. Larsen replied that according to the
Planning Department records both the Jonasons and Wilma Smith appear on all
mailing lists for the Namron project and that neither mailed notice was returned
as undeliverable. Regarding the definitions in the Comprehensive Plan and how
they were applied to the subject property, Mr. Larsen said the factors considered
were the history of the site, the density of surrounding similar type of
developments, the proximity to a minor arterial street and its proximity to the
Grandview commercial area. During review it was felt that,the subject property
fit within the category for high density primarily because of those factors.
Attorney Erickson advised that the Zoning Ordinance reads that we can condition
final approval and those conditions must be met to the satisfaction of the Planner
before final approval becomes effective. There is an ordinance process by which
landscaping plans are given to the city for its review and approval and those
plans are then guaranteed with a bond in the amount of 150% of the estimated cost
and covers two growing seasons. Continuing; Member Smith said that he had asked
the developer to prepare the sectional graphics illustrating the elevations and
sight lines from the Jonason residence to the Vernon Oaks development to determine
what height would effectively screen the project from anyone looking from west to
east. He has asked the developer to consider 16erming along the westerly border in
those areas where the natural terrain is less.,'r,;;han 940 feet in elevation and to
place coniferous trees on top of the berm to. accomplish effective screening for
the residents to the west. He added that he felt it was also important that the
building be screened from Vernon Avenue. With those conditions, Member Smith
stated that he felt progress had been made on the site and that the developer has
responded with the signalization agreement, parking agreement and landscaping. He
noted that the county has not approved a traffic signal for the Ayrshire/Vernon
intersection and that the neighborhood should consider the speed limit and signal.
aside from this issue as not,-all residents necessarily want the speed reduced or
the signal. He said that he "had asked the developer to respond to the economic
factors of a reduced density for the project. He commented that he would view any
future proposed apartment development very closely as to density as he felt the
single family homes which have been the main supporters of the school system has
been the reason people want to live in Edina. Mr. Mahoney commented that he felt
the density issue was a community problem, that we should draw the line, stand
still and go over it all before this high density project is given final approval.
In response to comments of Member Smith, Mr. Bjornnes said that with regard to the
berming and the westerly border of the property there is no problem with that. He
.said he has discussed with the Park Department clam - shelling any trees that can be
moved from the site over to the Duncraig Park at no cost to the City. With
respect to'the.berming itself, they will do whatever staff feels is appropriate
for additional screening with a combination of berming and trees. He said he
would like to see the speed limit reduced as that would be good for everyone. As
far as the signalization request that is a contractural promise and if the signal
goes in they will pay their fair share. Regarding the economics as to why the
density cannot be smaller, Mr. Bjornnes said there were a number of reasons.
Underground parking expands the costs significantly, makes a high quality project
but brings with it certain minimum requirements. The minimum number of stories
above underground parking to make the economics work is three stories. They had
considered four stories but thought that was too intrusive. Less than three
stories would not work because this is a stick building. If you move to type two
construction which is concrete then you have to go more stories. They felt that
there was a delicate balance of what is the smallest it can be made and still make
it work economically and what is appropriate for the site. Mr. Bjornnes said a
combination of those factors yielded the three story design above the underground
parking. Mr. Mahoney countered with the comment that he felt Mr. Bjornnes figures
should be reviewed and that he questioned Mr. Bjornnes' credibility. Bruce
Carlson, 6212 Parkwood Road, stated he had known Mr. Bjornnes for a long time and
said he resented the fact that anyone would question his credibility. He said he
is a real estate broker and that he knows of three or four couples that he had
sold upper bracket homes to that want to stay in Edina who cannot find good
quality apartments. He said he was aware of some of the other projects built by
Mr. Bjornnes; that he is very meticulous and highly creditable. Al Hipps,
landscape architect for the project, said he has had experience in working on site
development with mature oaks and the cost and expense in trying to save them. He
said that he has found Mr. Bjornnes to be very responsive to concerns he had on
the site development process. He had advised that a lot of the oak trees were in
need of trimming and Mr. Bjornnes had responded immediately by contracting for
trimming of the trees. In working with Nick Pailai on the site lay -out, they
discovered there were some natural land forms that they wanted to save and extra
money was spent in trying to design an entrance road that would preserve the
character of the site. Mr. Hipps then explained the landscape plans for the site
and stated that he felt as a development group they have been responsive to the
concerns of the City staff, concerns of adjacent neighbors, and have met with
Member Smith to discuss berming and intensifying the plantings along the entrance
road. He explained the specific topography on the westerly border of the property
and said that as he walked the site he felt that the privacy issue for the
adjacent homes would be addressed by the existing vegetation that will be left
there and the supplemental proposal of 15 additional trees along the west and
northwest part of the building. In response to Mr. Schmid, Mr. Hipps pointed out
the areas and types of existing vegetation that would be preserved on the site and
the areas where plantings will be intensified. No further comment being heard,
Member Turner moved that the public hearing be closed. Motion was seconded by
Mayor Courtney.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
Member Turner then moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -All and
adoption of the resolution for final plat approval as follows, subject to these
conditions:
1) Payment of a subdivision dedication fee"of $26,400.00, 2) Executed Developer's
Agreement, 3) Executed and recorded Proof of Parking Agreement, 4) Executed
Assessment Agreement for cost of signalization, 5) Landscape Plan approved by
staff, reflecting suggestions made by Member Smith:
ORDINANCE NO 825 -All
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
BY ADDING TO THE PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (PRD -4)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the
following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residence District (Sub- District PRD -4) is
enlarged by the addition of the following property;
That part of the following described part of Government Lot 7-, Section 28,
Township 117, Range 21, lying West of a line running South parallel with the
East line of said Government Lot 7 from a point on the North line of said
Government Lot 7, distant 845 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof to
the Northwesterly right of way line of U.S. Highway No. 169; commencing at
a point on the North line of said Government Lot 7 distant 845 feet West
of the Northeast corner thereof; thence South parallel to the East line of
said Government Lot 7 a distance of 708 feet to the point of beginning;
thence South parallel to said East line 190 feet; thence West parallel to
the North line of said Government Lot 7 to the West line thereof; thence
South to the Southwest corner of said Government Lot 7; thence East along
the South line thereof to the Northwesterly right -of -way line of U.S. Highway
No. 169; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly right -of -way line to
its intersection with a line drawn East, parallel to the North line of said
Government Lot 7, from the point of beginning; thence West to the point of
beginning, according to the Government Survey thereof; and That part of the
North 1/2 of Government Lot 2, Section 33, Township 117 North, Range 21 West
of the Fifth Principal Meridian lying Northwesterly of the right -of -way of
State Highway Nos. 169 and 212, all according to the United States Survey
thereof."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage
and publication.
RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
FOR VERNON OAKS
BE IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled " VERNON OAKS", platted by Vernon Woods of Edina, a Minnesota
limited partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of
May 18, 1987 be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Motion for adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -All and final plat approval was seconded
by Mayor Courtney.
Member Turner said her motion was based on these general reasons: l) The proposal
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the Housing Chapter
speaks to a commitment to high quality residential development; it speaks to a
goal of widening the range of housing choices for Edina families in all stages of
their life style. The Comprehensive Plan speaks to a proposal being consistent
with surrounding land uses. Multi- family use in this location is appropriate, is
consistent with the other apartments around it, is adjacent to heavily traveled
roads such as Vernon Avenue, and is a good transitional use between single family
homes and the more intense commercial, industrial and office use a block away.
The project is well buffered by the easement, the park, the heavy vegetation, and
the unusual topography, all of which reduces the visual impact on the neighbors.
Traffic has been brought out to Vernon again reducing the impact on the single
family homes. The project meets the intent of the Grandview Redevelopment Plan as
well as the Comprehensive Plan in regard to encouraging multi- family use adjacent
to commercial areas. 2) The project meets the Zoning Ordinance requirements with
the addition of the Proof of Parking Agreement. 3) The proposal addresses
concerns raised at First Reading. Specifically, a sidewalk will be constructed
which will improve pedestrian safety and access to the commercial area and a storm
water drainage plan acceptable to the Engineer has been developed. Additional
traffic generated will be modest. A resolution petitioning the Hennepin County
Board of Commissioners to reduce the speed limit on Vernon Avenue will be
introduced. Member Turner concluded her reasons with the comment that the City
should also continue to enforce the speed limit with our special controls and that
we monitor closely whether the traffic signal is warranted. Member Richards
commented that he generally agreed with Member Turner and that he felt no
community has spent more money and time in its planning effort. He said that this
Council, with the exception of the newest member, and every previous Council he
has sat on has always raised the issue of density and a well planned community.
The density issue was reviewed again within the past year and, with the exception
of the newest member, the Council reaffirmed what we have done in the past. The
density for the subject property could go as high as 40 and as low as 12 per
acres. Those who have looked at the density issues and have tried to address them
in a realistic, rational manner trying to take in all the factors would feel that
what we have before us is a reasonable development so that people who presently
live here can afford to continue to stay here. He said he would probably support
the motion for those reasons. He added that anyone should speak out on the issues
at any given time, whether they are a long -time participant or a new participant,
and if there are different views they should stick by them and not suggest that
what has been done in the past should be totally ignored, so that the Council can
come to a resolution as the procedures dictate. Mayor Courtney commented that
Member Richards has been a fighter for fairness with respect to density for
proposed developments. Member Smith said that he still was bothered by the
definitions in the Comprehensive Plan as to density and that he really questioned
whether we wanted more apartments in Edina. Following further comment on the
Comprehensive Plan process, Member Smith said that he has tried to be responsive
to everyone's concerns and would only support the proposed development on the
following basis: 1) Berming on the west property line to an elevation of 938 feet,
without killing vegetation, 2) Additional trees on top of the berm necessary to
screen the development from the neighbors on the west, 3) That some of the
subdivision dedication fee be specifically designated for enhancement of the park,
4) Speed'limit reduction on Vernon Avenue and petitioning the county board for a
traffic signal at Hansen Road, 5) Screening along Vernon Avenue as feasible, 6)
City to complete sidewalk from west border of project down to Ayrshire Boulevard.
In response to the last condition, Engineer Hoffman reiterated his recommendation.
at the last meeting that State Aid funds be used to.coraplete the sidewalk down to
Ayrshire. Member..Turner commented that the landscaping items were included in her
motion, that the speed reduction would need separate action and that the
subdivision dedication fee is a separate item. In reference to the subdivision
dedication fee, Member Richards said that very substantial subdivision dedication .
fees have been collected that have gone to enhance the general.park program of the
City; that there are a lot of parks in the City that need attention and that
proposals for park improvements have generated a lot of discussion by the Council.
'He said he did not feel the City would be well served by setting the precedent of
taking money from a specific subdivision dedication fee and designating it to be
used in one particular park. He said he supported the Park Department making a
recommendation to the Park Board for improvement of the subject park, with the
Park Board coming back and recommending that it be included in the capital
improvement budget with all the other requests that .compete for funding. Member
Smith moved to amend Member Turner's motion to add the following: 1) That the west
side of the property be bermed to an elevation of 938 feet, 2) That coniferous
trees 12 to 15 feet tall be planted sufficient to screen the site from the west
view and that they be placed as close to the top of the berm as is practicable,
and 3) That $6,000.00 from the subdivision dedication fee be diverted for the
enhancement of the park adjacent to the development. Following discussion of the
.amendment, specifically the $6,000.00 to be used for the park, Member Smith
deleted the third item of his amendment. Mayor Courtney called for a second to the
amendment. Member Richards seconded the amendment. Mayor Courtney called for a
rollcall vote on the amendment.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Richards, Courtney
Nays: Turner
Amendment passed.
Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote.on the main motion as amended.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Smith, Richards, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance and resolution adopted.
Member Turner then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Vernon Avenue between Highway 100 and Gleason Road is County Road 158;
and
WHEREAS, citizens adjacent to and in nearby residential areas are concerned about
the speed of traffic on Vernon Avenue; and
WHEREAS, said citizens have appeared before the Edina Community Development and
Planning Commission and the Edina City Council with their concerns; and .
WHEREAS, the current speed limit on C.S.A.H. L58 IS 40 MPH on the majority of the
roadway;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council requests that Hennepin
County reduce the speed limit on C.S.A.H. 158 from 40 MPH to a lower limit; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council requests that the speed limit
be reduced on C.S.A.H 158 from 40 MPH to 30 MPH on Vernon Avenue from Tracy Avenue
east to the existing speed limit of 30 MPH.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall.:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Member Smith then asked how best to proceed for the traffic signal at Hansen Road.
Engineer Hoffman explained that the issue has been considered by the Traffic
Safety Committee and it was concluded that the location would not meet warrants
for a traffic signal at.this point in time. It was concluded that no formal
action be taken now but that staff would watch the traffic situation at that
location.
PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL CONTINUED
TO 6/15/87. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered
placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen advised that the subject property is the
site of the Fairview Southdale Hospital located immediately east of France Avenue
and north of West 65th Street. The request for Final Development Plan approval to
construct a new medical office building is a continuation of a proposal that was
initiated in December of 1986. The request was heard by the Council on December
15, 1986 and has been before the Community Development and Planning Commission on
three different occasions. Mr. Lars
Planning Commission the
project has
over the first proposal
as follows:
12/3/86
Proposal
Gross Floor Area
84,240 SF
Bldg Height
5 story
Bldg Footprint
15,736 SF
Total Site FAR
0.80
Zoning Ord. Limit
1.0
Ramp Height 3 levels
plus
basement parking
on northerly
section
Total Parking 1345
Parking for
Office 492
Parking for.
Hospital 853
en said that during those hearings before the
evolved and significant changes have been made
l
1/28/87 Proposal
79,199 SF
6'r�;tory
12,096 SF
0.78
1.0
3 levels but
60 foot setback
on third level
1298
442
856
4/29/87 Proposal
68,328 SF
5 story
12,672 SF
0.77
1_0
2 levels plus
basement on
northerly section
1238
399
839
Mr. Larsen explained that the footprint of the ramp has been the same in all three
proposals. The first proposal would have added one additional level to the
existing ramp and carried that elevation out towards the Crosstown Highway where
it would have been three levels, plus_a basement parking level. In the second
proposal the third level was notched back in 60 feet. The proposal before the
Council removes the entire upper level of the ramp and carries forth the elevation
of the existing ramp out towards the Crosstown Highway, with the new areas
resulting.in two levels plus a basement level. The existing ramp would remain as
it is presently. Total parking on the site as a result in the reduction of the
building has been reduced from 1,345 to 1,238 spaces. As to variances, Mr. Larsen
explained that the plan as now proposed requests only one variance. The westerly
parking lot does not provide the required 20 foot setback from France Avenue and
West 65th Street. A variance is requested to allow the existing parking lot to
remain unchanged. The exterior materials for the medical office building remain
the same as in previous proposals, i.e. glass curtain wall in gray and silver.
The easterly access at 65th 'Street and Drew Avenue has been redesigned. The
revised design calls for two inbound lanes and one outbound lane. Internal access
to the emergency room has been improved to avoid conflict. As in previous:-
proposals the ramp would continue the 21.5 foot setback provided by the existing
ramp along the easterly property line. The ramp would range from 15 feet to 18
feet in height, measured from the existing ground elevation. A 4 -foot high.berm
is proposed along the entire length of the ramp to reduce the exposed surface
area. Exposed aggregate panels are suggested for the facing on the exposed areas
of the ramp and the existing ramp facing would be converted to the aggregate
finish. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the landscaping plan emphasizes the easterly
side of the parking ramp along the shared property line with the Colony
Condominiums. Proposed materials include spruce, pine, ash and locust to reduce
the visual impact of the ramp. The size of the proposed materials is in excess of
Ordinance requirements and additionally, there is a compliment of shrubbery and
the area would be irrigated to help the survival of the plantings. The plan also
proposes to install a landscape screen for the westerly parking lot. Although not
a zoning issue, there has been discussion at all of the hearings on the hospital's
incinerator and their use of it. Since the last hearing, there has been a meeting
between the hospital, representatives of the Colony and representatives from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the agency which regulates the use of
the incinerator. The hospital has stopped burning the red bag waste from their
Ridges Hospital and there is an ongoing review of the operation of and emissions
from the incinerator by the MPCA. The hospital has committed to carry forth on
any improvements that might be ordered in the future by the MPCA relative to their
use of that facility. In reviewing the most recent proposal, Mr. Larsen said that
staff was able to identify several changes or improvements over earlier proposals:
1) The building has been reduced in size by 11,900 square feet or 19 percent,
2) The entire upper level of the parking ramp has been removed; the ramp addition
has been reduced in size by approximately 100 spaces, its height has been reduced
by approximately 10 feet which lessen the impact on adjacent properties, 3) The
building has been reduced to its original five -story height, 4) The proposal
complies with all Zoning Ordinance requirements except for the setback of the
existing westerly parking lot, 5) Extensive landscaping is provided adjacent to
the ramp; an irrigation system will help insure the survival of the plantings;
6) Internal traffic circulation has been improved to eliminate conflicts with
emergency vehicles, and 7) The MPCA is continuing to review the operation of the
incinerator. At the April 29, 1987 Planning Commission meeting, after hearing
from staff, representatives of the hospital and representatives of the Colony, a
motion to recommend denial of the proposal failed; a subsequent motion to
recommend approval also failed. After some discussion the Commission members felt
they were deadlocked on the proposal and that the most appropriate action was to
forward it to the Council without recommendation. Mr. Larsen concluded by saying
that representatives of the hospital were present to speak to the proposal.
Dr. Richard Lund stated that he was chairman of the physician's group that will
build and own the medical office building. He said that they have reduced the
size and impact of the building to a minimize size that will still function
effectively for its intended purpose. In an effort to do this successfully they
hired the firm of Dahlgren, Shardlow & Uban, Inc. as consultant to help them plan
the site. He said that Howard Dahlgren would present the revised proposal.
Mr.. Dahlgren began his presentation by briefing the Council on his background as a
planning consultant and said that he has not spoken to any member of the Council
individually about the project as he felt it was appropriate to do this in a
public hearing. He said that the changes to the proposal are significant and that
they have done a more elaborate analysis -of what is going on around the site
and:how the land around it will be impacted by this development proposal. By use
of slides, Mr. Dahlgren then presented the revised Final Development Plan for the
Fairview Southdale Physicians' Medical Office Building. Major components of the
Plan shown were: 1) surrounding land use, 2) zoning districts in the area, 3) land
use plan, 4) the Colony and the hospital's east property line abutting the Colony,
5) Edina Towers building and Fairview Southdale hospital, 6) site as it exists
today, 7) site as proposed, 8) summary of proposed development, 9) relationship of
the Colony townhouses and existing parking ramp, 10) proposed ramp and berm on .
east property line with coniferous trees and swale, 11) landscaping plan and 12)
traffic circulation. Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that the whole green strip between
the subject property and the Colony will be irrigated and the doctors owning the
medical building agree to hire the Colony maintenance staff to maintain the green
strip. They would also agree to a condition whereby a final landscape plan is
evolved, subject to staff approval, with the involvement of representatives from
the Colony. They have also agreed to participate in the cost of future street and
.traffic improvements should they be required in the future. Douglas Robinson,
Administrator of Fairview Southdale Hospital, then spoke to the need for the
medical office building. He stated that this project is driven by several forces:
1) the marked increase in the average age of residents of Edina and surrounding
communities, 2) that older people require more medical services, more visits of
physician's offices and more specialty services because of the complexity of their
medical problems, and 3) the need to provide space for medical practices that are
growing. He pointed out that the Southdale Medical Office Building has a very
high occupancy rate of 98 percent and this tight situation has even led to offices
dividing their space between floors in the building. The project has the
expressed interest of 23 groups and approximately 70 physicians. Mr. Robinson
said that 50 percent of the building will be occupied by practices that need more
space, 18 percent will be occupied by practices new to the area, 22 percent will
be occupied by practices that want to return to the campus and 10 percent will be
occupied by shared ancillary services, i.e. lab, x -ray, pharmacy, etc. Vacancy
created by some of these practices leaving the Southdale Medical Office Building
will be refilled by other offices currently in that building which need to
increase their space and new practices which will be recruited to the area by
Fairview Southdale Hospital. In conclusion, Mr. Robinson stated that this project
will increase physician-office capacity in the area. In turn this will enable
physician's practices to grow to better accommodate current and forecasted
consumer demand and will provide local alternatives for new specialty practices to
the area. This broader base of medical services will provide greater.convenience
and access to medical services for the residents of Edina and surrounding
communities. Member Smith questioned the efficiency of the parking ramp point
adjacent to the Colony and the Crosstown Highway in that it blocks the view for
the Colony units as much as if it were the full width of the ramp. Mr. Dahlgren
said the ramp could be dropped back slightly as the parking that would be lost
would be one bay wide. Member Turner commented that of concern to a number of
people has been the traffic in the general area and the traffic that cuts through
on Barrie Road. She asked what options there might be to address these concerns.
In response Mr. Hoffman said staff took some counts after the first hearing by the
Planning Commission on Barrie Road. Basically approximately 1,600 vehicles daily
travel north /south on Barrie Road between West 65th Street and Heritage Drive. Of
that number approximately 20% of the trips went all the way through. The license
plate survey showed that there were quite a few vehicles from southwest
Minneapolis. Over the years there have been concerns about making a left turn out
of Heritage Drive onto Xerxes Avenue during rush hour traffic and a contributing
factor is its proximity to the Crosstown Highway ramps at Xerxes. Staff has
talked several times to Hennepin County staff about the possibility of some day
closing Heritage Drive to Xerxes or constructing a median on Xerxes whereby left
turns would be prohibited. Mr. Hoffman said he has also talked to both Hennepin
County and the City of Richfield about the possibility of signalizing the
intersection of West 64th Street /Xerxes some day to service the neighborhoods.
More importantly, as was pointed out repeatedly in the traffic report, is the need
to upgrade West 66th Street with a traffic signal at Drew Avenue. As to timing,
Mr. Hoffman said he has urged Hennepin County to put in their capital improvement
program the upgrading of West 66th Street from France Avenue to York Avenue. The
County often responds to local input in terms of their capital improvement program
and if the Council wants to suggest to the County that they feel that is important
he said he felt they would look at that. Mayor Courtney then asked for comment
from the audience. Speaking in objection to the proposal were the following:
Phillip Smith, President of Colony of Edina Condominium Association; Tony Pikul,
6409 Colony Way, John Soll, 6401 Colony Way; Alvin Krulik, 6401 Colony Way; Jack
Kritzer, 6309 Colony Way, Carlton Helming, 6401 Colony Way; and Mary Galvani, 6409
Colony Way. They raised these issues: impact of the immensity of the ramp,
traffic problems, safety aspect, question of need for the medical office building,
value reduction of Colony condominiums and that the land should be limited to
hospital expansion only. It was noted that five letters of objection had been
received from the Colony neighborhood. Member Smith then raised these questions:
1) Where would additional parking be put -if thef hospital should expand in the
future ?, 2) Was any consideration given to loca,zing the office medical building to
the north of the hospital ?, 3) Why not move the parking ramp closer to West 65th
Street? Mr. Dahlgren responded that there are no current plans for expansion of
the hospital but should it occur in the future the expansion would be to the west
and existing surface parking would have to be converted to a ramp. As to location
of the office medical building they did look at siting it to the north but felt it
would not work well over there. He explained that they could not encroach on the
power plant area as that structure was not built to support a ramp. Member Smith
commented that he has sympathy for the residents of the.Colony who will have to
look at the ramp wall, that`the hospital has done some positive things to respond
to their concerns, but that he felt. that more could be done with the ramp to.
lessen its impact. In response Mr. Dahlgren said that the ramp as it extends to
the north could be cut back by approximately 40 feet with very little impact on
the parking capacity. Phillip Smith raised the question of hospital expansion and
noted that Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch, Inc. report of January 14, 1987 mention was made
of an outpatient treatment facility to be located in the northwestern corner of
the complex. Mr. Robinson explained that the hospital had a site study done to
identify the options for use of the land, options for parking and had asked the
consultant to look at the feasibility of two buildings. The consultant said that
basically one building was feasible on the site for medical office space, that the
preferred.location is as presently proposed. A second building was examined for
the northwest quadrant and that was determined not to be very feasible because of
setback requirements. That area is identified for future ramp parking but there
are limitations as to height. Mr. Robinson said they also looked at the area near
the power plant and that was-determined to not be a very practicable solution to
increasing the parking because of the structural problems it presents and the
costs associated locating the parking there. Member Richards asked Mr. Robinson
if what we see now will be the extent of improvements and if the hospital would
commit to that. Mr. Robinson replied that as to future expansion of the hospital
site that they would not expand beyond the existing hospital footprint.
Member Turner asked why the parking ramp could not be located on the west side of
the hospital. Mr. Robinson said that it was not feasible to put the ramp there
because of the setback requirements. Member.Richards commented that in looking at
the proposal and the Planning Commission recommendations that if this were a
vacant piece of property we would not see what is proposed. He said that the
hospital is a wonderful institution for the community, is a good corporate citizen
and adds immeasurably to what is good about Edina but that he felt that the
proposal was too much for the site. The proponents have the right to expand the
facility, whether it be hospital or medical office building, but not of the size,
nature and extent of what is proposed - that -it is too much and he could not
support it. He said his first priority would be to the hospital and any future
expansion to it. Also, that the residents of the Colony should not be impacted by
a visual wall even though heavy vegetation will be planted. Member Richards said
he would support something but not of this magnitude. He said he would like to
give the proponents the opportunity to re- evaluate and reassess the project.
Member Turner commented that she did support the medical office building, that it
is within our FAR requirements and is more reasonable now that it has been sized
down. She said she could not accept the massive straight line of the parking ramp
adjacent to the Colony and would like to see some other ways of designing the ramp
to lessen the impact on the neighborhood; that the green space at the northeast
corner of the site could be just as effective as the green space on the hospital
front. Member Smith said he agreed, that he did not have a problem with the
medical office building, that the whole area needs help, but that the burden of
the ramp should not be borne by the Colony or any neighbor. He said he was
bothered by the extension.of the ramp to the northeast corner and hoped they could
come back with some modification. Mr. Dahlgren responded that they appreciated
the comments made by the Council and would like the opportunity to make some
adjustments to see if they can come up with a plan that would'be workable and
acceptable. He added that the question is not whether they have the right to
expand but how it can be done best. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member
Turner to continue the public hearing to the Council meeting of June 15, 1987.
Ayes: Smith, Turner, Courtney
.Nays: Richards
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR U.T.F.C. ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were
presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen'advised
that the subject property is generally located east of Washington venue and north
of I -494. It is zoned PID Planned Industrial District and is developed with a
three story building on the easterly portion of the property. The south property
line is the Bloomington -Edina border. The proponents own the -site and the
southerly adjacent site in Bloomington. The Bloomington property is undeveloped.
The proponents seek to rearrange property lines for the two sites to create a more
desirable building site on the Bloomington property. Outlot A of the plat would
be attached to the Bloomington site and the Bloomington land east of Nine Mile
Creek would be attached to the Edina site. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the new
building would be constructed on the Bloomington side. Outlot A would be used for
a driveway and possibly some parking. The owner will give the City a conservation
easement over Outlot A to prevent attempts to develop the site independently in
the future. The request was considered by the Community Development and Planning
Commission at its meeting of April 29, 1987 and recommended approval, subject to
staff conditions. No comment or objection being heard, Member Smith introduced
the:following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to 1) Final Plat
Approval, and 2) An executed and recorded conservation easement:
RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL
FOR UTFC ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled "UTFC- ADDITION', platted by Cherne Contracting Corporation
and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 18, 1987 be and is
hereby granted preliminary plat approval.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REGIS CORPORATION CONTINUED TO
6/15/87: HEARING DATE SET FOR VACATION OF ARCADIA AVENUE. Affidavits of notice
were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen
advised that the subject property is located south of Vernon Avenue /West 50th
Street and is split by Arcadia Avenue and that the request is for construction of
a new office building. Regis Corporation has its corporate headquarters at 5000
Normandale. They own the one -story office building at 5075 Arcadia and the
Biltmore Bowl at 5113 W. 50th Street. Their stated intent is to redevelop this
4.2 acre site as their new corporate headquarters. Redevelopment would occur as
their space needs increase. The Final Development Plan under consideration is for
Phase I of the redevelopment. Phase I calls for the demolition of the 4,100
square foot building at 5075 Arcadia and the construction of a new 3 -story
building containing a gross floor area of 23,765 square feet. The new building
will.be connected to their existing building. Total office area will be 41,265
square feet. The Zoning Ordinance requires 206 parking spaces for a building of
this size. Regis is proposing 137 spaces and projecting 167 employees. This
parking count does not include the 86 spaces provided for the bowling alley. In
support of the request for a variance on the parking quantity, Regis is proposing
a proof of parking agreement to solve any future parking shortages. Mr. Larsen
said that office buildings are required to provide a 20 foot side yard setback.
Portions of the lower walk -out level encroach into this setback. Also, because of
the building height the northeast and southeast corners of the upper level fail to
provide the required setbacks. Exterior materials for the new building will be
glass curtain wall and stone trim and would comply with ordinance standards. The
exterior treatment of the existing building would remain unchanged. Regis has
indicated that in approximately five years they will either tear down the existing
building or re -skin the building to meet ordinance requirements. They are asking
for a temporary variance on the exterior materials for the existing building. Mr.
Larsen pointed out that Arcadia Avenue splits the site from north to south. The
proposal assumes the vacation of the northerly leg of Arcadia and its
incorporation into the Regis site. This proposed vacation is consistent with
recommendations made by BRW in the land use study they made of the Grandview Area.
Staff does not expect parking shortages but should they develop the proof of
parking agreement will insure adequate parking for the proposed use. The bowling
alley is complimentary to the office use and the spaces can be effectively shared.
Mr. Larsen noted that.the building setback variance is at the least obtrusive
portion of the site. It also allows for a more efficient parking arrangement.
Due to the elevation of the site, the building will be very prominent when viewed
from the east. The proposed landscaping is excellent but some existing
landscaping is substandard. Trees missing from the front of the bowling alley
should be replaced and the northeast parking area should be screened. Staff would
recommend plan approval with the following conditions: 1) staff approval of a
revised landscaping plan, 2) recorded Proof of Parking Agreement, 3) vacation of
Arcadia right of way, and 4) temporary variance of exterior materials. Mr. Larsen
concluded that at its meeting of April 29, 1987 the Community Development and
Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval, subject to staff conditions.
Sandy Ritter, architect for the project, stated that this would be the first phase
of a corporate site that Regis Corporation intends to develop for their own use
and to expand as needed. He said that Regis Corporation has grown rapidly over
the past four to five years and anticipate further growth. Phase I is the
smallest size building they felt was economic to build at this point in time.,
Initially Regis would probably occupy 10,000 to 12,000 square feet of the
building, fill up the space as they grow and at some point in the future look to
additional expansion. Mr. Ritter said that"one of the issues for the site is that
the original building was a restaurant, then was a retail space and has now become
their corporate office. They have spent considerable time and money in developing
a first class space in the interior, but the building still retains the heritage
of a ranch house facility.
The building which will be added will be a contemporary building, located to the
south, and eventually the existing building will be either re -clad or replaced.
Mr. Ritter then presented graphics showing theiproposed location of the new
building, the elevations and the landscaping. He indicated that Christopher Fox,
Vice President of Regis, was present to answer any questions relating to the
corporation. Mr. Ritter presented a letter addressed to the Council from
representatives of the Pantry Restaurants, Inc. and the Eden 100 Building
expressing their interest and concern about the vacating of Arcadia Avenue and its
impact on the access to their properties. Member Smith asked for a clarification
on when the bowling alley might be removed. Mr. Ritter said the use of the
bowling alley would continue until such time as parking may become a problem. He
said that Regis is committed to change the use of the bowling alley or eliminate
it at that point in time should additional parking be required. Their intent is
to the develop the site as the Regis corporate headquarters and the bowling alley
is simply a holding transaction. The building to be demolished in Phase I is the
small building located to the south between the existing Regis office building and
the Pantry Restaurant. The initial new construction would be entirely on the east
side of Arcadia. Member Richards asked Mr. Ritter to respond to the comments in
the letter from representatives of the Pantry restaurant and the Eden 100
Building. Mr. Ritter said he had not talked to them and that they were not
familiar with the implication of what would happen to their properties if the
north portion of Arcadia Avenue were vacated. He said it was their feeling, and
the report done by BRW supports it, that ingress /egress right off Vernon Avenue is
not a great advantage. The vacating of Arcadia would funnel traffic back to the
signalized intersection at Interlachen Boulevard /Vernon Avenue which they feel
will be beneficial. Member Richards asked what the timing is on the project. Mr.
Ritter said they would like to begin construction in early fall and, assuming the
Council approves the plan, they are in position to move a head immediately on
working documents. Member Richards asked if there was any problem in continuing
this matter to the next meeting so as to allow the Pantry and Eden 100 Building
people time to familiarize themselves with the proposed project. Chris Fox, Vice
President of Real Estate for Regis, said they have not had an opportunity to speak
with the owners of the Pantry Restaurant and that they had not attended the
Planning Commission hearing. He said they do have a concern and that it has to do
with free access, that traffic would be allowed to flow from Arcadia Avenue across
the unnamed bowling alley street and back to Vernon Avenue. He added that
although a delay would not be critical that they are "bulging at the seams" and
would like to proceed. Attorney Erickson said that a condition to the proposed
project.is the vacation of the street. That process requires two week's published
notice which makes it doubtful for the first meeting in June. The approval of the
final development plan and the vacation of Arcadia are tied together and should be
considered at the same time. Member Smith asked why the building is crowded to
the easterly side of the property thus requiring setback variances. Mr. Fox said
the building was moved easterly to satisfy some parking requirements on the west
side of the site. He explained that the existing grade along the 5075 Arcadia
building drops off to the north and that the space cannot be utilized. There are
some retaining walls against the entry ramp to T.H. 100 and other existing
physical conditions that they felt would not compromise the interest of any other
owners in requesting the variance. be utilized. The building was therefore moved
in that direction to provide the maximum amount of parking on the west side of the
site. Member Smith asked when the bowling alley might come down. Mr. Fox
responded that the proposed building would allow at least five years of growth.
If they made a major acquisition or something were changed the process may have to
be accelerated. He said all the tenants in the bowling alley are on short term
leases so as to provide flexibility. Member Smith asked if they intended to
remove the existing office building sometime in the future. Mr. Fox said the
existing building is very good from an office use point of view, although
architecturally they are not satisfied with its exterior. He said they have not
made a decision as to removing it or expanding in another direction and that they
wanted to keep their options open. Member Smith moved to continue the public
hearing on Final Development Plan for Regis Corporation to the meeting of June 15,
1987 and introduced the following resolution, moving adoption:
RESOLUTION CALLING PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described easement for
street purposes should be considered for vacation, in accordance with the
provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 412.851 and 160.29:
DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF ARCADIA AVENUE TO BE VACATED
That part of Arcadia Avenue as dedicated in the recorded plat of Tingdale
Bros' Brookside according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on a line run
parallel with and distant 20 feet southerly of the north line of Lot 1,
Block 8, said Tingdale Bros' Brookside distant 15 feet west of its
intersection with the east line of said Lot 1, to a point on the north
line of Lot 17, Block 7, said Tingdale Bros' Brookside, distant 25 feet
east of the northwest corner of said Lot 17, Block 7, and lying northerly of
of the easterly extension of the north line of the roadway easement across
Lots 5, 6, 7, said Block 8 as recorded under Document No. 1079434 in the
office of the.Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
PART OF PARCEL 20 S.P. 5 -3L -3 AND
PART OF PARCEL 38B S.P. 2733 (100 =130) 903
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. All of Lots 1 and 2 except that part of said Lot 2 lying northerly
of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the east line of
said Lot 2 distant 20 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence
running southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant
40 feet south of the northwest corner thereof, Block 8, Tingdale Bros.'
Brookside, according to the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County,
Minnesota, the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate
of Title No. 539711;
which lies northeasterly of Line 1 described below and southerly of Line 2
described below:
Line 1. Beginning at a point on a line run parallel with and distant
20 feet southerly of the north line of said Lot 1, distant.15 feet west of
its intersection with the east line of said Lot 1, thence run southeasterly
to a point on the east line of said Lot 1, distant 20 feet southerly of said
intersection and there terminating;
Line 2. Beginning at the point of beginning of Line l described above;
thence run easterly to a point on the north line of Lot 17, Block 7, said
Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, distant 25 feet east of the northwest corner
thereof and there terminating;
together with all right of access control, being the right of ingress to
and egress from that part of Parcel 38B herein conveyed to the lands
adjacent thereto.
PART OF PARCEL 40B S.P. 2733 (100 =130) 903
That part of Tract A described below:
Tract A. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Block 7,
Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, including that portion of the south half of Yancy
Street vacated, located between extensions northward of the east and west
lines of Lots 1 and 17 of said Block 7, but excepting therefrom any portion
of said Lots taken by the State of Minnesota for state highway purposes,
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto
being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 594790;
which lies northwesterly of Line 1 described below and southerly of Line 2
described below:
Line 1. Beginning at a point on the north line of Lot 17 said Block 7
distant 25 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence run south-
westerly to the southwest corner of said Lot 17 and there terminating;
Line 2. Beginning at the point of beginning of Line 1 described above;
thence run westerly to a point on a line run parallel with and distant
20 feet southerly of the north line of Lot 1, Block 8, said Tingdale Bros.'
Brookside, distant 15 feet west of its intersection with the east line of
said Lot 1 and there terminating;
together with all right of access control, being the right of ingress to
and egress from that part of Parcel 40B herein conveyed to the lands
adjacent thereto.
2. This Council shall meet at the time and place specified in the form of notice
included in paragraph 3 hereof for the purpose of holding a public hearing on
whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public.
3. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and
purpose of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks, in the Edina
Sun - Current, being the official newspaper of the City, the first publication at
least 14 days prior to the date of such hearing and to post such notice, at least
14 days prior to the date of such hearing, in at least three (3)_.public and
conspicuous places within the City, as provided in Minnesota Statutes,
Section 412.851. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form:
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON VACATION OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES
IN THE CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, will meet at the Edina City Hall, 4801 W..50th Street on
Monday,_June 15, 1987, at,7:00 p.m., for the purpose of holding a public hearing
on the proposed vacation of the following street:
(Legal description as in paragraph 3. above)
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not
the above proposed street vacation is in the public interest and should be made
shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to
which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of
the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects.the authority
of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric,
telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water
pipes, mains and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to
continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion
thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto,
for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to
which any or all of any such easements, and such authority to maintain, and to
enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried; resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A19 (FLOOD PLAIN) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED. Affidavits of
Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner
Larsen informed the Council that Section 21 of the Zoning Ordinance regulates and
controls activities within the designated floodplain. Regulations of activities
in the floodplain is mandated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA),
the agency for federally backed flood insurance. From time to time FEMA audits
the City's rules and administration of those rules. Continued eligibility of
Edina property owners to receive flood insurance depends on our performance.
As a result of a recent audit, Mr. Larsen said that the Ordinance must be amended
to delete-references to flood proofing methods other than structurally dry methods
as certified by a registered engineer in accordance with floodproofing regulations
contained in the Minnesota State Building Code and adopted by the City. At its
meeting of April 29, 1987 the Community Development and Planning Commission
unanimously recommended approval of the amendment. No objections or comment being
heard, Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A19 with waiver of Second
Reading as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825)
TO DELETE REFERENCES TO FLOODPROOFING METHODS OTHER
THAN STRUCTURALLY DRY METHODS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA; ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subparagraph (ii) of Section 21.F.1. is amended to read as
follows:
"(ii) any nonresidential structure with a basement floor, or first
floor if there is no basement, not elevated above the regulatory
flood protection elevation must be floodproofed by structurally dry
methods as certified by a registered engineer in accordance with the
floodproofing regulations made a part of the Minnesota State Building
Code as, and to the extent, adopted by the City."
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and
publication.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
UTILITY EASEMENT VACATION GRANTED FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, WINSOR ADDITION. Affidavits
of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer
Hoffman advised that this public hearing is being held following receipt of a
petition to vacate a utility easement on Lot 1, Block 1, Winsor Addition. There
has been no objection to this vacation either by the City or the utility
companies. No comment or objection being heard,.Member Turner introduced the
following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION VACATING EASEMENT FOR UTILITY PURPOSES
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 20th day of April, 1987
fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of easement for utility
purposes; and
WHEREAS, two weeks' published and.posted notice of said hearing was given and the
hearing was held on the 18th day of May, 1987, at which time all persons desiring
to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the
public that said easement vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects
existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the
vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning
or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and
sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the
proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such
easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or
otherwise attend thereto:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following described utility easement be and is vacated
effective as of May 19, 1987:
The North 5.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, WINSOR ADDITION
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice
of completion of proceedings to be.prepared, entered in the transfer record of the
County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 412.851.
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith.
Rollcall :
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -265. CONTRACT #87 -7 (ENG). Motion was
made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for Public
Improvement No. BA -265, Contract #87 -7 (Eng), (West 50th Street construction from
Edina Ct to Halifax Av) to recommended low bidder, Bury & Carlson, Inc. at
$369,000.00. e
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TWO SNOW PLOWS. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Member Turner for award of bid for two snow plows to recommended low bidder, La
Hass Manufacturing &- Sales, at $6,247.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR OF ELECTRIC WELL MOTOR. Manager Rosland advised
that an emergency repair of an electric well motor is required because of the dry
weather. He explained that the motor was damaged by the contractor during a
routine inspection and that the City will place a claim against the contractor for
the cost of the repair. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member
Turner for approval of the emergency repair of the electric well motor by Layne
Minnesota at $15,169.00.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
COUNCIL LIAISON ASSIGNMENT TO BE DISCUSSED AT JUNE 1, 1987 MEETING. The Council
briefly discussed the liaison appointments which had been assigned by Mayor
Courtney. Member Richards said he was comfortable with the assignments but
suggested that this be discussed at the June 1, 1987 meeting when Member Kelly
would.be present. Member Turner said that because the Council has set up a new
process she would like to see another Council Member appointed to the Personnel
Committee. In was informally agreed to discuss this more fully at the June 1,
1987 meeting.
ON -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR GOOD EARTH RESTAURANT. Manager Rosland advised
that an application for an On -Sale Beer License has been received from the Good
Earth Restaurant, 3460 West 70th Street. The application is being processed
through the Police and Health Departments and approval should be conditioned on
final clearance and approval by the departments. Motion of Turner was seconded by
Member Smith for approval of issuance of an On -Sale Beer Licence to the Good Earth
Restaurant, subject to final clearance by City staff.
Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY REPORT ACCEPTED. Engineer Hoffman referred to his memorandum
pertaining to the public hearing held on May 6, 1987 at the Edina Community Center
for the purpose of receiving public input on potential transportation improvements
in the I -494 Corridor. He said that following the hearing the Project Management
Team has started the process for narrowing alternatives. Recommendations for
short -range actions relating to the I -494 mainline have been drafted. Long -range
strategies for the I -494 mainline are: 1) add one lane in each direction but
design the facility to accommodate an additional pair of lanes in the median, and
2) operate this additional lane as an HOV lane demonstration project. He said he
has made some arguments why the HOV lane did not make sense and that he would like
to know if the Council was uncomfortable with that position. He added that there
are other strategies still being talked about. It was informally agreed to accept
the report with no further comment.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REGIONAL HIGHWAY JURISDICTION REPORT DISCUSSED. Engineer
Hoffman advised that he has been on two task forces in the last seven years with
regard to highway jurisdiction. There have been repeated suggestions that MNDOT
could solve some financial problems by returning lesser roads to cities and
counties. It has been suggested that 12,000 miles of roadway be removed from the
state highway system. He pointed out that legislation was passed in 1985 to deal
with the suggestions and the Metropolitan Council will conduct a public hearing .
May 26, 1987 on the recommendations of the Regional Highway Jurisdiction Study
Report. He said that the AMM Transportation Committee will be meeting on May 20,
1987 to discuss ARM policy and testimony at the public hearing. Mr. Hoffman said
one of the positive suggestions in the report is the recommendation for creation
of an ad hoc highway jurisdiction board which would have representation from local
government and agencies including MNDOT to serve as an arbitrating panel for
highway jurisdiction changes if agreement cannot be reached. He said he did not
feel the group should study the issue of possibly changing the state statutes
which relate to financing of the highway system, such as use of gas tax funds. He
said he felt that the issue was that there are not enough fund to do the things
they have to do. He said he felt the AMM Transportation Committee will generally
support the report as a whole but will not support all of the recommendations. He
added that the cities get 9 percent of the gasAtax and have actually 16 percent of
the miles of roadway under their jurisdiction." The report was accepted with no
comment by the Council.
*FEASIBILITY REPORT APPROVED FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS• HEARING DATE SET. Motion
was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve the feasibility
report for the following improvements and to adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON
SIDEWALK,IMPROVEMENT NOS. P -S -38 AND P -S -39
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the proposed improvements described in the form of Notice of
Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said
report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, June 1, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to mail notice to all
affected properties in substantially the following form:
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. _
The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, June 1, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina
City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, to hold an informal public hearing on the
construction of sidewalk _(location)_. This hearing has been called as .the
result of _(specific request)_
This hearing is considered informal since it is proposed to pay the entire cost of
the improvement from Municipal State Aid Funds and there is proposed to be no
assessment against abutting property. Under present City policy, maintenance
(snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The
estimated cost is
This sidewalk is proposed to be five (5) feet wide and constructed of Portland
Cement Concrete. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property
features to the greatest extent possible.
Any inquires, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding the improvement
may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the
hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information,
please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the cost of
the hearing.
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works /City Engineer
Motion carried, resolution adopted on rollcall vote, four ayes.
APPRECIATION EXPRESSED ON NAMRON PROJECT. Member Smith said he appreciated all
the information and help he had received from the Planning Department and the City
Attorney regarding the Namron project.
AMM ANNUAL MEETING NOTED. Mayor Courtney advised that the annual meeting of the
AMM will be held.on May 28, 1987 and that he would be attending with the City
Manager.
RETIREMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIRECTOR NOTED. Manager Rosland advised that Robert
Buresh, Public Safety Director, has given written notice that he will be retiring
from the City as of May 31, 1987 and that his resignation has been accepted.
*CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 5/18/87: General
Fund $344,314.00, Art Center $4,919.50, Swimming Pool Fund $247.59, Golf Course
Fund $26,326.04, Recreation Center Fund $10,461.49, Gun Range Fund $79.25, Utility
Fund $40,279.46, Liquor Dispensary Fund $100,009.70, Construction Fund
$107,472.36, Total $634,109.39; and for confirmation of payment of claims dated
4/30/87: General Fund $873,504.61, Art Center $980.41, Swimming Pool Fund $136.42,
Golf Course Fund $5,015.13, Recreation Center Fund $8,975.22, Gun Range Fund
$120.62, Utility Fund $17,355.75, Liquor Dispensary Fund $314,828.48, Total
$1,220,916.64.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda Mayor Courtney declared the
meeting adjourned at 12:22 a.m.
City Clerk
III.A
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Public Hearing - Link Road BA- 278+/r
d
DATE: May 28, 1987
First, a short background to this project.is appropriate. This hearing is
a continuation of an initial hearing involving what is known as Issue
Area 1 in the Grandview Area Traffic Study. The neighbors in the Richmond
Hills 2nd Addition have supported the current proposal to resolve what has
been a continuing problem at Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. Additionally,
overall traffic operations have been reviewed in light of existing and
potential developments in the Grandview Area. Twenty property owners.from
the immediate area were notified of the hearing.
The hearing was continued due to concerns expressed by Super America station
on the impacts of the..project. The staff has met with Hennepin County and
Super America officials. The meetings.have produced an alternative
acceptable to both parties and an alternative that staff can recommend to
City Council. The major change is the addition of a right turn lane on
`Vernon Avenue from west of Link Road.thru the intersection to the first
westerly driveway of Jerry's. This results in an estimate of cost for
BA -278 to change from $170,047.24 to $194,354.33.
Staff will present more. details on the project Monday evening.
FJH:lmb
III.B.C.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager /
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Hearing for Sidewalks S -38 and S -39
DATE: May 28, 1987
Attached are hearing notices sent to abutting property owners for two
short sidewalk projects. Both projects are a result of needs expressed
by residents or business owners. Both projects are proposed to be funded
by State Aid.
The Olinger Boulevard project, S -38, would be constructed along Countryside
Park, Colonial Church and Nine Mile Village property. Nine Mile Village
Townhouse Association representatives have met with us and support the
project.
The West 70th Street project, S -39, would be constructed along the north
side of West 70th Street from France Avenue to the existing walk just west
of Valley View Road. Kinderberry Hill at 3950 West 70th Street strongly
supports the project.
The staff expects representatives from Nine Mile Village and Kinderberry
Hill to be present Monday evening to support the projects.
FJH:lmb
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -38
S.A.P. 120 - 147 -09
Olinger Boulevard from Bredeson Park Path to Tracy Avenue
The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, June 1, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. at
the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, to hold an informal Public
Hearing on the construction of sidewalk on the south side of Olinger
Boulevard from Bredeson Park Path to Tracy Avenue. This hearing has been
called as a result of requests from residents in this area, for better
pedestrian access to the Bredeson Park.
This hearing is considered informal since it is proposed to pay the entire
cost of the improvement from Municipal State Aid Funds and there is proposed
to be no assessment against abutting property. Under present City policy,
maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the
City. The estimated cost is $28',242.25.
The sidewalk is proposed to be five (5) feet wide and constructed of Portland
Cement Concrete. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property
features to the greatest extent possible.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this im-
provement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and
4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the
close of the hearing.
Thank you. �7
Francis J. offma , P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH:lmb
May 22, 1987
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -39
S.A.P. 120 - 145 -13
W. 70th Street from Valley View Road to France Avenue
.The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, June 1, 1987 at 7:00 P.M. at
the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, to hold an informal Public
Hearing on the construction of sidewalk on the north side of W. 70th Street
from Valley View Road to France Avenue. This hearing has been called as a
result of concerns expressed by child care providers on the north side which
request better pedestrian access to the Countryside Park area
This hearing is considered informal since it is proposed to pay the entire
cost of the improvement from Municipal State Aid Funds and there is proposed
to be no assessment against abutting property. Under present City policy,
maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will.be the responsibility of the
City. The estimated cost for the north side is $18,134.34.
The sidewalk is proposed to be five (5) feet wide and constructed of Portland
Cement Concrete. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property
features to the greatest extent possible.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this im-
provement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department
prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 A.M. and
4:30 P.M., Monday through Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon
the close of the hearing.
Thank you.
J
Francis J. Hoff /a
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
FJH:lmb
May 22, 1987
III.B.
May 29, 1987
Francis J. Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
and City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Pr000sed sidewalk on Olinger Blvd., south side, between the
Bredesen -Park Path and Tracy Avenue
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
As a resident of Edina and of Nine Mile Village, I strenously object
to the above- referred to proposal, for the following reasons:
1) A sidewalk will detract frcat the natumal appearance of
the area, one of its main attractions,
2) A sidewalk on the south.side of Olinger will detract from
the appearance of the entryway landscaping of Village Nine,
and, in effect, reduce the property values of the townhouses,
3) Since there are no residents on the southside of Olinger
Blvd. proper, the request for the sidewalk apparently
came from the residents on the north side of Olinger;
the site walk would not effect the appearance of their
properties to the same extent as it will effect Nine rule
Village.
4) A cost of $28,242 year after vear (and higher, of course, as
the years go by) seems far .too costly for the very few
number of people it may convenience to have a sidewalk - and
that at the expense of detracting considerably not only from
Nine Mile Village, but from the area as a whole. Mie City surely
has needs far more important to more people than the proposal.
I will appreciate your callimg the attention of the City Council to
the items I've listed above, before any vote is taken on the issue.*
Sincerely,
'i
Jeanne BeVier
621.6 Sandpiper Court
Edina, Mn. 55436
* Enclosed are copies.
rb
J.
LOCATION h
LOT
DIVISION
NUMBER LD -87 -5
L O C A T 10 N 7700 Marth Court /5901 Long Brake Trail
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
�,\ LD -87 -5 7700 Marth Court
5901 Long Brake Trail
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the northerly 30 feet
of Lot 5 would be transferred to Lot 2 of Braemar Hills 10th
Addition. The division would increase the depth of Lot 2 to
approximately 155 feet while reducing the width of Lot 5 to
.120 Feet. Mr. Larsen added both lots would continue to exceed
all Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. John Palmer moved to recommend approval. Mr. Lee
Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion
carried.
t
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 27, 1987
LD-87-51 7700 Marth Court
5901 Long Brake Trail
Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addn.
and Lot 2, Block 2, Braemar Hills 10th Addn.
General Location: North of West 78th Street and west of
Marth Court .
The northerly 30 feet of Lot 5'would be transferred to Lot 2
of Braemar Hills 10th Addition. The division would increase the
depth of Lot 2 to approximately 155 feet while reducing the width
of Lot 5 to 120 feet. Both lots would continue to exceed all
Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Recommendation
The division will improve Lot 2 and will not negatively
impact Lot 5.
Staff recommends approval.
\ I
rne�.noR � b. ci° 4Mr xvr.i %7 I VF-WEY' H/Ll_
N B9' S2.3o'
WARRAW
/fA/V5 ON
A001T10Awl
�epl
c�
of
1
N
3
V1
W
U
2 �
K
Af
0- .
:it M
I'
I
r
T1
o ao ron /
.SGALts //V "7'
o p AOTES /,EtYV *WWL#AENT
HEAR /NOwS 5444W AIRS ASAL4MED
PRAINAG96 AND uT,L.,TY GASQMMN7
ARE SICWN TMWA3:
I I
J Li
t
VB6 /N4 /QO PBCtT AN WroTN AND
;j ADJViN#,Va* r?. W. LJN6.0, ANO
S.0 FQET /N W /A7rA1 AND ADIOIN
//VE► LOT LANES, 4NL4053 or"P -ewtsE
/NPP"7Ti0, AS f^CMArV CN/ THO ALA:
0
v
. oo
TT N Y9' ii'E
i U I
r u. 8TH x F : E S7Ri
�S TPAVF4D
AMP wdC "M%* irTfO l
S7-RF6 T
r N ' Sfv'o9'B `77ar SA CcrGwr On r S W. I/4
Ti s yx.TH 4,rc can �i.. s.w. ��4 of si. a °� TNO s w. ,/� of sic. 8, T ��r, id ?A.
I i M..1NTfl
DFWFY HIS .L CIRCLF
a.
I
:,
g 5
I
�
I
L-- /3oc�o
- -J'
�u W
s
Ig
aool
M
W�
Wt
I 1)
I
b
I
I
ry
L sve-
J J
--J.—as-
�
r N 89•SiZ•#�•i
,
I �
I
I
I
j�
a�
I`
I
I
I
�
-- /30 m __ J
WARRAW
/fA/V5 ON
A001T10Awl
�epl
c�
of
1
N
3
V1
W
U
2 �
K
Af
0- .
:it M
I'
I
r
T1
o ao ron /
.SGALts //V "7'
o p AOTES /,EtYV *WWL#AENT
HEAR /NOwS 5444W AIRS ASAL4MED
PRAINAG96 AND uT,L.,TY GASQMMN7
ARE SICWN TMWA3:
I I
J Li
t
VB6 /N4 /QO PBCtT AN WroTN AND
;j ADJViN#,Va* r?. W. LJN6.0, ANO
S.0 FQET /N W /A7rA1 AND ADIOIN
//VE► LOT LANES, 4NL4053 or"P -ewtsE
/NPP"7Ti0, AS f^CMArV CN/ THO ALA:
0
v
. oo
TT N Y9' ii'E
i U I
r u. 8TH x F : E S7Ri
�S TPAVF4D
AMP wdC "M%* irTfO l
S7-RF6 T
r N ' Sfv'o9'B `77ar SA CcrGwr On r S W. I/4
Ti s yx.TH 4,rc can �i.. s.w. ��4 of si. a °� TNO s w. ,/� of sic. 8, T ��r, id ?A.
I i M..1NTfl
DFWFY HIS .L CIRCLF
�' � ��-•t �R � 4`5,9 -v vv ...'ST an _ �o'o `° +„01 �e ' I� 9• .;,
_ ^ .�r. �« ..f J• �.l �. O 16 , t` l ,�� fry. � J a`,
NNIE
- -• M o roc ••,,a o - - • _ s ;o... ►�. / s
=•ii .. •r. _ s tia �'� • -� ' �+� 'O • " ?4 !2!'S -��.+
'j. btr �� ad,
C �`' �' •• _t\ �� .�► ;��� 2 ;`
m ��� FISO t �i5) ice° ` ^� !'i•
�.� ,, , `: • �� 8
3CO 5 0 .� ' rDslac. T - '.�'•i Z ;�` i - �� C,�p'• . �� 9S
t
r � � /ss •� � � S� 6.' 1 L � v 1 . ' g o W ..
o - t°-9 _T a ?ENM r 1 _ w�� ,� .:e `� (1t . Z _' i� _ e tip' 124i
.f
ao s- • JKlE 4
3 p) °f�r1291 �a
Jam. Lc' Bf aD x v r. i "� O ,. •..^
2 • EN'KR 1
4�1
Ap
VC .ti�6 0 s,n� 2 t �i9 °`tp['f�tl) `, �jv : �370� �q ° • °c:
• .i � v .mss � z
8 Ta CO. .�- z, "°�' .
; +• ti ` s .i� '��� iSS1 Q:A4 \M� /� `' -8
�` ; *� ?•fiil ° 5'�� ��� �,C.`�t _3i p0 iGj �65�� 4-0)
- J�. a ••�: 5 q� r `, H A' y
► 2 6 a,
cr
23 21,
40 imi► . n inn n !C •r •I rin
Cc
sos.s o ' ���3, n�, WARREN MANSON 2 % N83 #48
/�.
;1957-1
26 c gah ,��Je Wig, ' :c ... i ;:7
. .:� '` tts°1 /� `• a �,'.`
A
40 5a
�! ,a 7 38i3 Z\ --4W% TA i L 3
all 'O
ro `c ;r13 ► r �>Z `y�,t "S �`����:f- -c� - • '� << N ~ii G �° •ia _ _ .V
C�t, Y '^ •. % 7 �i /1) �t +k' i1i• 't. Nip
-i w s \�I >�/i V e I�+r►►ti u� -ltt �i �9 40 30 "�1` ► --
- ��� C``M/ f_�< Iii tiJ �� 'S __ . +.., aw -: '�� ( v - •ter 1 • : � -- �
.'_mot �dir CllC_ '3
I
- � �,_= ��_--_ 111 /`ljf,��,�„ -__ - � � • � 1 9
-�.
LP
\ eve. 11s:A i VvW W 49KO, AWWV5 IWe.,~
4
L
2
J
r ��5
r ,
LOCATION Consent Item
IV. A. 2.
L HILL
F66 NTAINW000 0 A110NAL ' C < ,
itAPTS
S z ,�g t a PJ� c�n� .t •,
3 vV,• •�•• AV ••.
,r ,t - } +•_ ± �t it .. Y ', ' 1•,�
�:» .•rte r,• 9 +
wERNO `� s:. 6LE SON z .r
r 4, ?a;f� fir. t �:t�L� J r.♦ ., -: '•
ZZ .:<: t�`K� • CA UCE1•, TRAIL
CRbSSVIE
UTHER
HE
'�iv t • + CREiK V4%LLEY f�_ ' • t
VaLLEY
ELEM.SCHOOL
LOT DIVISIOPI
.,�, s �'� ti. ri �.. •was � .� r&•1 G� t t�' .�'�'�.
NUMBER LD -87 -6
L O C A T 10 N 6537 -6539 McCauley Trail
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTM
EN1"
LD -8.7 -6 6537 -6539 McCauley Trail
\ Lot 5, Block 1
Indian Hills 3rd Addition
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proponents are
requesting a party wall division of a newly constructed
double bungalow. He added separate utility connections
are provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Runyan moved to recommend approval. Mr Palmer
seconded -the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 27, 1987
LD -87 -6 6537 -6539 McCauley Trail
Lot 5, Block 1
Indian Hills 3rd Addition
General Location: West of Gleason Road
and south of McCauley Trail
The proponents are requesting a party wall division of
a newly constructed double bungalow. Separate utility
connections are provided.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Ron.ifruegerlk CERTIFICATE
Associates, Inc. ��
8080 Wallace Road OF
°den Prairie, Minnesota 55344 -
�i SURVEY
(612) 934.4242
Engineering
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
:.Planning
Survey for: GC�S'7���sO�— tS�oG' I Job No. 7345 I Bk.41:2- Pg.
_ is 8 w Er
--
S - 38.5/" 53� 9S
I 3 _
o
X95 0 ,
��V �• 9S� �V
\ LEGAL DESCRIPTION
\ i
\ t That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd
Addition lying southeasterly of a line drawn
�\ from a point on the South line of said Lot 5,
` distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the South-
east corner thereof, to a point on the North
line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62 feet north-
westerly of the Northeast corner-thereof) cry
/23 ov
/-G-
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARI S OF /5�c A60t/t°�
/� ' 2CVI / Y MINNESOTA.
SURVEYED BY ME THIS ry DAY OF A 19 •
Ron Krueger a ti ® CERTIFICATE
Associates, Inc.. �®
8080 Wall'abe Road 0 F Engineering
Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344 -_ Land Surveying
(812) 934 4242 _
- SURVEY Landscape Architecture
Planning
Survey for: lJ ETA �' So/V A S o C . Job No 73¢s Bk.41� pg. `� 7
X68 gRo
3z,
.44
.N
°M 0
n, n
e �c
N 84 Zp 4
X3.60_ 8 Gi✓ Gle Fy
tJ �
i
r ad
5GA c.E 30
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd
Addition lying northwesterly of a line drawn
from a point on the South line of said Lot 5,
distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the South-
east corner thereof, to a point on the North
line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62 feet north-
westerly of the Northeast corner thereof u,A/
aee7
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUEAND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OFC—j;�-c Q6a /G
H�Nti /!7 rofmw , MINNESOTA.
SURVEYED BY ME THIS DAY OF �" 'Qy ,19 7
► [
LOCATION Mini • .
�. 3.
AY
.:. -rim ri. _ - ' - ' !•-
RN GLEASON ' ?'••
� CT •�
NAfl MES'T`= y
� Ms a
' # CROSSWE r {
UTHERA►
�yylr, iy �: yr• + CREFK-
' VALLE4f i^ti
NUMBER LD -87 -7
L O C A T 10 N 6545 McCauley Trail and 6301 Timber Trail
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PARK
i _ ry.�rk F; �'
-♦
`.t
r
ULY
CREEK• VAi_LEY tAT.r
•.
.''.,ELEM SCHOOL
TIM6E
�-
'
fit: p -
111p1A fl
eU
NUMBER LD -87 -7
L O C A T 10 N 6545 McCauley Trail and 6301 Timber Trail
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
r
ULY
�:. -.• �: s '. �- ._� hr.-
�-
fit: p -
111p1A fl
eU
NI
r
CRC L
BALDER LANE'
+
r
4
x.11 G
L`1L < _ ' �� a7fA� r e - 17 •i
Y z-, . r{ S•
LOT DIVISION
NUMBER LD -87 -7
L O C A T 10 N 6545 McCauley Trail and 6301 Timber Trail
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LD -87 -7 6545 McCauley Trail
6301 Timber Trail
Indian Hills 3rd Addition
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are
requesting a party wall division of a newly constructed double
bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Palmer moved to recommend approval. Mrs. Paulus
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
Q
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 27, 1987
LD -87 -7 6545 McCauley Trail /6301 Timber Trail
Lot 7, Block 1,
Indian Hills 3rd. Addition
General
Location: West of Gleason Road and south
of McCauley Trail
The proponents are requesting a party wall division of
a newly constructed double bungalow. Separate utility
connections are provided.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
Ilan Krueger S o
Assaciates, Inc. �=
8080 Wallace Road
Eden Prairie. Minnesota 55344 �0
(612) 934.4242 tiv
CERTIFICATE
OF
SURVEY
Engineering
Land Surveying
Landscape Architecture
Planning
1' Survey for: 4L)5714f-sdj0 ,4 )u0 �S� ✓A? E , I Job No. -73 22-! I Bk. I
- - ----IIZ--
to S � N•6' Go1P�t7EQ ar
JG Lo T
it 1 r
o I /
h
v S. e.eeA etz of
zo T -7
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF lee A' 1a 4d Z e'd
Geq a / ales c ,- iP --io.�
N Y, MINNESOTA.
�'� ,9 b ?
SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2 3 .,DAY OF 12 nnIAI n t ot)rrr
Ilan Ilruager s �■ ® CERTIFICATE
Wsseclates, Inc. =��
8080 Wallace Road O F Engineering
Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 ��_ Land Surveying
SURVEY Landscape Architecture
(812)934.4242
Planning
Survey for: 9 7*r1FFO•t/ AWD I 1tS�o�i�'T�S Job No. 7392 -t Bk. pg.
ff
J I
e C,gUGe Y
\ `o� "'
� raT
6CALE
• 5e t- LOC,•,g�2 or ea -r %
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF
fftU NTY, MINNESOTA.
SURVEYED BY ME THIS L3P� DAY OF J ►PP l� 19JL!
RONAI RIIF FR
Consent Item
LOCATION MAP
III■ .. � -� ���' �� � �
X11■ ■■ . •..■ ��►-���. � � �-
MEN
logo I I ■1■1 ro
iL• ;
ii IN ■ .
.-
• MM ME ii
\� i io
=M M= M. - -
• �M - M■ ii ii • -
�.���� M. min W.
���I��Si :� �■ �: 1
�►
��I�■■ ■�■ vi=ii s �
1�tol■■� ����'■
Illttttt■t .�� M.
LOT DIVISIO?j
NUMBER Ld -87 -8
L O C A T 10 N 7015 -7017 Lynmar Lane
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
n
od LD -87 -8
4;��
7015 -7017 Lunmar Lane
Lot 5, Block 2
Stow's Edgemoor Addition
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the proponents are
requesting a party wall division of an existing double
bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Palmer moved to recommend approval. Mr. Lee
Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The
motion carried.
t
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 27, 1987
LD -87 -8 7015 -7017 Lynmar LAne
Lot 5, Block 2
Stow's Edgemoor Addition
General Location: South of west 70th Street and
east of Lynmar Lane
The proponents are requesting a party wall division of
an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections
are provided.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
i
a
QI
_1
r�
d
�0
u
n
d
�r
J -
0 CQ
Y
i wJ
J �
0�
3
�O Ex15TIUL, ydvUSC I L!1' C�
f O JY&4W 63'r u� bR.t•tE tZ _ I Lj �.
I
opE1JDi£� (aoN MC{.1UMEN'(
Tofu rF c.A4e.l.E 5r.A6 Er.�u g� ;.3
4op OF 24m-r. F&-iz Ei�Ev a5G.1
Gt1. t P-r, c t-A
SEE SWEET Z OF 2 SN EET5
,1
I
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I.am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Date: ��,�f,.�,G�� !71
RE"(, 5- ►4 - S-1 LeRoy H. $ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
SUeET 1 4>;-- Z SH EE-TS
I
I
<
Q�
I
�I sa
I
I
to
c�.A
Gt1. t P-r, c t-A
SEE SWEET Z OF 2 SN EET5
,1
I
I hereby certify that this survey was prepared by me or
under my direct supervision and that I.am a duly Registered
Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
Date: ��,�f,.�,G�� !71
RE"(, 5- ►4 - S-1 LeRoy H. $ohlen
Registered Land Surveyor No. 10795
SUeET 1 4>;-- Z SH EE-TS
SHEET '2 OF 2 SHEETS
DESCRIPTION PARCEL A
That part of Lot 5, Block 2, STOW'S EDGEMOOR
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of a line,
and its extensions, drawn from a point on the west
line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the
southwest corner thereof, as measured along said
west line, to a point on the east line of said Lot
5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southeast corner
thereof, as measured along said east line, and
subject to easements of record.
DESCRIPTION PARCEL B
That part of Lot 5, Block 2, STOW'S EDGEMOOR
ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of a line,
and its extensions, drawn from a point on the west
line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the
southwest corner thereof, as measured along said
west line, to a point on the east line of said Lot
5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest corner
thereof, as measured along said east line, and
subject to easements of record.
t
LO Consent
ffilmriffill I I lifilim
'1011111 1111 i��ll ����� �■► ■
EDINA /
PUBLIC �t
I■
� �,:, �� �IIII■111■ �
- �■ ■ ■ ■■ `dl■■tlllil
LOT Dilva"Isloom
NUMBER LD -87 -9
L O C A T 10 N 5101 Vernon Avenue
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
QE LD -87 79
-d
Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
5101 Vernon Avenue South
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission-Jerry's is requesting
a lot division -which would separate the Grocery Store Complex
from the Hardware Store Complex. This is necessary in order
to have separate mortgages. Mr. Larsen added the division
will not have zoning compliance implications.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Mr. Palmer moved to recommend approval. Mrs. Shaw
seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
MAY 27, 1987
LD -87 -9 Jerry's Enterprises, Inc.
5101 Vernon Avenue South
Request: Simple lot division within existing
tract of land.
Jerry's is requesting a lot division which would
separate the Grocery Store Complex from the Hardware
Store Complex. This is necessary in order to have
separate mortgages. The division will not have Zoning
Compliance implications.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval.
,..fir �7u /3or!
CAR.I]ARELLE d.. ASSOCIATES, INC. a
L A H O S 6 R V E T 0 R 5
6440 Illlrq D.16 11,11.. 0b. hatl. Yle.mb. 64611 90... 110- I41aojl j A
scale Revisions Drawn B Date
Date ro .lov
Dr•n O - I IVL2
1600k 1,,A Page
q. ' •. .. -.. 1111.., _11_1,•1.. .............. µ,. _.,�! ....<,.. -y L \9r
•. .L "T._ I G. R<.S Ma /391 —'
jHEET Z FoR OE3GIe /P T/O A..1
/7/.293 6Q FT (Tn i, 9T. Sf-r tlT) +• 1 °•• • �::/ a t, �i�',P I .•
1 f•`p. t..o
W.1 nvmlw- er
_ C°—t-0 F., THa I ..... C... u.: TN 24162 -1
''l `�- 01`,0 ` `• I $ � V N — - i e.. °' '..
ti lip
•_ J ° °G' I °tic + +t' f,.f /. r °+
J y'S � Ed i na � nnA
ga.•:e�..i AF..; l 4 /979 u
A 1 23,1987 /' o•t1f\ 1
ne�1•.s. O1 ;tid,i'µpiy- ��.(� °ooi ��./ . +.. III � pq� TR4cT - •-
XAL9 P-4D' `{�'[Y• _ is^ C `rfc. " "� 0'6. \le:� 9.. eaa ....J\ I11
�� � e V ��• _ �r 141111 - f .:. - �\ �+o. oil ;�
'
o„-
C�., ��.` ly • - tee, • -•C r�.,a - - ----i +
bu �• eo - - _ II. , •� , �k le / : l �.y�s�i.+� efv N � � 9 777- 1
\ V I f °�� r To. 6- do {aaF. ^ T
1 f-g
9 W
I "t
141111 A
Ib0 `co 119 I---e
- -- _, -3
46 n x
` - - -' - -: 62 ' - -� - -I it -�I I � / a .. 1• • r
_ -- - -� -� -- - - -I _ b ilo• a� - - -jgr
rw ti'ek
b.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners.have requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition except the northerly
30 feet thereof.
and
Lot 2, Block 2, Braemar Hills 10th Addition and the northerly
30 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not-interfere with the
purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the
City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land -but-are not waived for any
other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however,
to the provisions that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless
made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or
with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those
ordinances.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
-That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition lying south-
easterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot 5,
distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner thereof, to
a point on the North line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62 feet north-
westerly of the Northeast corner thereof, as measured along said
North line.
and
That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition lying north-
westerly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said
Lot 5, distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner
thereof, to a point on the North line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62
feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner thereof, as measured
along said North line.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other prupose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to
the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made
in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the
prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of
land:
Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota; lying easterly of a line and its southerly
extension drawn from a point on the North line of said Lot 7
distant 63.5 feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner of said
Lot 7, to a point on the South line of said Lot 7 distant 43.14
feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 7, and
there terminating.
and
That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on
the North line of said Lot 7 distant 63.5 feet northwesterly of
the Northeast corner of said Lot 7, to.a point on the South line
of said Lot 7 distant 43.14 feet northwesterly of the Southeast
corner of said Lot 7, and there terminating.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land
is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801
and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance
thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose
or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision
that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance
with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a.single tract of
land:
Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into
separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcel A: That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying north of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point on the
west line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest
corner thereof, as measured along said west line, to a point on the
east line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southeast
corner thereof, as- measured along said east line, and subject to
easements of record.
Parcel B: That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition,
according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying south of a line, and its extensions, drawn from a point on the
west line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest
corner thereof, as measured along said west line, to a point on the
east line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest
corner thereof, as measured along said east line, and subject to
easements of record.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivisinn and
Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship
and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes
of the Subdivision-and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina
Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of
Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts
of land is hereby approved "and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance
No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and
conveyance thereof as.separate tracts of land but are not waived for any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no
further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with
the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval
of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land:
TRACT I. PARCEL 1:
Lots 11, 12, 13 and 14, Block 3, Grand View Heights and Lots 15, 16 and 17,
Block 3, Grand View Heights, and that part of Lot 18, Block 3, Grand View Heights,
lying South of a line running from a point on the West line of said Lot 18, a
distance of 1.20 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Lot 18 to a point in
the East line of said Lot 18, a distance of 0.70 feet South from the Northeast
corner of Lot 18, except the West 17.5 feet of said Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18, all
according to the map or plat on file or of record in the office of the County
Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
TRACT I. PARCEL 2:
The West 17.5 feet of Lots 15, 16, 17 and 18, Block 3; All of Lots 18, 19 and
20 and that part of Lot 17 lying East of a line drawn from the Southwest corner of
said Lot to a point on the North line of said Lot a distance of 28 feet East of
the Northwest corner thereof, all in Block 4 together with all of- vacated Summit
Avenue lying Southerly of the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 17,
Block 4, and Northerly of the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 20,
Block 4, all according to the plat of Grand View Heights on file or of record in
the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
TRACT I. PARCEL 3:
Lots 19, 20, 21, 22 and that part of Lot 18 lying North of a line running
from a point on the West line of said Lot 18, a distance of 1.20 feet South of the
Northwest corner of said Lot 18, to a point on the East line of said Lot 18, a
distance of 0.70 feet South of the Northeast corner of said Lot 18 and there
terminating, except the West 17.5 feet of said Lot 18, and: together with all of
that part of the East 1/2 of vacated Summit Avenue lying North of the South line
of Lot 19 as extended West, and South of the North line of Lot 22 as extended
West; all in Block 3, "Grand View Heights," according to the plat thereof on file
or of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
TRACT I. PARCEL 4:
That part of Lot 16 lying East of a line drawn from a point on the South line
thereof distant 28 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 16 to a point on
the North line of said lot distant 47 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof,
Block 4, Grand View Heights, and that part of the West Half of the adjoining
vacated Summit Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the North and
South lines of said Lot 16, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in
the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County.
TRACT I. PARCEL 5:
That part of Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, Block 4, Grand View Heights, lying East
of State Highway No. 5 and that part of the adjacent portion of the West Half of
vacated Summit Avenue lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of
the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said Lot 15, which lies
Westerly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of said
State Highway No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the
office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County.
TRACT I. PARCEL 6:
That part of Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, Block 4, Grand View Heights, and that
part of the adjacent portion of the West Half of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining
Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue
of the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said Lot 15, all of which
lies Easterly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of
State Highway No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the
office of the Register Deeds in and for said County.
TRACT I. PARCEL 7:
The South 20 feet of Lot 23, Block 3, Grand View Heights and the South 20
feet of that part of the adjacent portion of the East half of vacated Summit
Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 23
across said Summit Avenue.
TRACT II. PARCEL 1:
Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles,
Hennepin County.
TRACT II. PARCEL 2:
Lots 23 and 24, Block 3, Grand View Heights and that part of the adjacent
portion of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly
extention of the South line of said Lot 23 across said Summit Avenue and lying
Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 24 across said
Summit Avenue, except the South 20 feet of Lot 23 and except the South 20 feet of
vacated Summit Avenue.
TRACT II. PARCEL 3:
That part of Lots 11 and 12, Block 4, lying East of State Highway No. 5,
Grand View Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of West Half of vacated
Summit Avenue lying between the Easterly extensions across said avenue of the
North line of said Lot 11 and the South line of said Lot 12, which lies Westerly
of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of said State
Highway No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of
the Register of Deeds in and for said County.
_._ TRACT II. PARCEL 4:
That part of Lot 12, Block 4, Grand View Heights, and that part of the
adjacent portion of West Half of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining said Lot 12,
lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North and South
lines of said Lot 12, all of which lies Easterly of a line parallel with and
90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway No. 5, according to the plat
thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for
said county.
TRACT II. PARCEL 5:
That part of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying adjacent to and
West of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of
Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate
parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7_ of Tract I all as described above.
and
Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Tract II all as described above.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of..the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
"V.A.1 & 2
ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A18
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B(2)
OF SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 825
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Repealer. Paragraph B(2) of Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 825
is hereby repealed in its entirety.
Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately
upon its passage and publication.
16 SECTION 7. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE TO ALL DISTRICTS EXCEPT AS
OTHERWISE STATED
A., General. No building or structure shall be erected, constructed
or pl'aced on any property in the City, and no building or structure or
property in the City shall be used for any purpose, unless_ in full
compliance with the restrictions and. requirements of this ordinance and
other applicable ordinances of the City.
B. Trash Storage.
1. All Properties Except- Single Dwelling Unit and Double
Dwelling Unit Buildings. All solid waste material, debris, refuse,
garbage or similar material shall be kept within closed containers
designed for such purpose. Said containers shall not be located in
the front yard and shall be completely screened from view from all
lot lines and streets.
(d) no signs of any ind shall be used to identify the use;
(e) all parking demands generated by the use shall be
accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway
7 -1
l
2. Single Dwelling Unit and Double Dwelling Unit Buildings.
All solid waste material, debris, refuse, garbage or similar material
shall be kept within closed containers designed for such purpose.
Said containers shall not be located in the front yard and shall not
be visible from the front lot line.
C. Dwelling Units Prohibited in Accessory Buildings, Temporary
Buildings, Trailers and Recreational Vehicles. No accessory building,
temporary building, trailer or recreational vehicle in any district shall
be used for a dwelling unit or units, except for accessory buildings
which are specifically allowed for residential use by this ordinance.
D. Customary Home Occupations as an Accessory Use.
1. Customary home occupations which are permitted as an
accessory use by this ordinance shall comply with the following
conditions:
(a) only the residents of the dwellling unit are employed
on the lot or within the dwelling unit;
(b) no exterior structural modifications are made to
change the residential character and appearance of the lot or
any buildings or structures on the lot;
(c) no loading or unloading or other outdoor activities,
except parking, shall occur;
(d) no signs of any ind shall be used to identify the use;
(e) all parking demands generated by the use shall be
accommodated within the accessory garage and the normal driveway
7 -1
l
1b
ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711
TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES
ON THE CURB ON A TEMPORARY BASIS
FOR A PORTION OF NORTHEAST EDINA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting
"(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4 and by adding a new paragraph
"(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows:
"(b) Within that portion of the City located north of Sunnyside Road
and east of Wooddale Avenue, grass clippings and leaves suitable for
composting may be placed next to the street or curb for pickup provided
that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored
within a plastic bag designed for such a purpose, and ii) placed at
the curb no more than 12 hours prior to the scheduled pickup."
Sec. 2. The provision of Sec. 4(b) of this Ordinance No. 711 shall
automatically cease and be of no further effect on December 1, 1987.
Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage
and publication, but not earlier than August 1, 1987.
i6DINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 - 927 -8861
May 14, 1987
Mr. Ronald W. Weeks
5113 Blossom Court
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Thank you for your correspondence regarding the propriety of allowing
Edina City Police Officers to tape record conversations with citizens.
I would strongly encourage you to attend next Monday's City Council
Meeting so that this matter of concern can be discussed with the Council
Members at a public meeting.
Please contact the City Clerk, Marcella Daehn, to be placed on the agenda
for the Council Meeting of May 18, 1987, at 7:00 PM.
Sincerg
/ � c
Fre erick S. Richards
Council Member
FSR /sw
cc: City Council Members
l
doom
CITY pF
EM
E®INA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
612 -927 -8861
May 5, 1987
Mr. Ronald W. Weeks
5113 Blossom Court
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Dear Mr. Weeks:
The Edina City Council has directed the below response based on your
letter to.them dated April 28, 1987, regarding Police Officers taping
conversations.
The Council directed the City of Edina's Legal Counsel, the law firm
of Dorsey & Whitney, to research the matter. In part, their findings
include:
"Police officers violate no law or duty in tape recording their
conversations with citizens in the course of an arrest or
detention. A state statute on this subject expressly excludes
liability under these circumstances, and Minnesota has never
recognized a cause of action for invasion of privacy under
these circumstances. Also, there appears to be no federal
prohibition against making such a tape recording."
Secondly, the Edina Police Department researched the practice within the
Department. The tape recordings are only used for administrative purposes.
They are not used for evidence gathering and are not presented in court.
The sole purpose of the officer involved who employs such a technique is
to protect himself from complaints levied against him which lack foundation.
The Police Department has articulated a policy on the matter which basically
states that the practice is not encouraged nor is it prohibited. Therefore,
it is left to the individual officer's discretion whether he or she will
utilize a tape recorder.
I hope this letter will adequately answer your questions. If you require
further explanation, please contact Chief Craig Swanson at 925 -2242.
Very truly yours,
Kenneth E"Rosl nd
City Manager
KER /sw
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000
DATE: May 29, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
2 Boxes for Dump Trucks
Funded thru Equipment Replacement Fund
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Midland Equipment
2• J. Craft Inc.
-/11 3. LaHass Mfg.
Department Recommendation:
Midland Equipment
Finance Director's Endorsement:
The recommended bi is is not
VII.A.
Amount of Ouote or Bid
$15,590.00
$17,000.00
$19,974-00
$15,590.00
Works - Streets
Signa re Department
within the amount budget for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City M ger's Endorsement:
1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve
the purchase.
2. I recommend as an alternative:
e
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor and City Council
-FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept.
VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000.
DATE: May 27, 1987
Material Description (General Specifications):
Fiberglass tool box body for carpenter and utility truck
Quotations /Bids:
Company
1. Lahass Manufacturing and Sales
3575 Highway 13
St. Paul, MN 55122
@. Fruehauf Division
VII.B -
Consent Agenda
Amount of Quote or Bid
$5,993
$6,183
Department Recommendation: Lahass Manufacturing & Sales $5,993
//
Finance Director's Endorsement: Signature Department (/
The recommended bid is is not within the amoun bud t for the purchase.
John Wallin, Finance Director
City..Kanager's Endorsement:
1. -I concur with the recommendation of the Department and re mmend
Council approve the purchase.
2. L recommend as an alternative: iiN
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
* Mayor will ask for assistance from time to time to serve on this committee.
** Committee will be dissolved in the reasonable neak luture.
VIII.A.
Glenn Smith
Recycling Commission
Heritage Preservation Board
Board of Appeals &
Adjustments
Citizens Committee for
Braemar Sports Comples
Centennial Commission
City /School Liaison
Regarding liaison to the City's advisory boards /commissions, it is not necessary for the Council members to attend
every meeting. However, they should keep abreast of what they are doing and respond to any questions or issues raised.
COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES
Mayor Courtney
Fred Richards
Leslie Turner
Peggy Kelly
* Personnel (City Manager)
Park Board
Community Development &
Art Center
Mayor's Cable Program
Building Construction
Planning Commission
Human Relations Commission
Special Appearances
Appeals Board
SHHSC Board Member
Community Health Services
Mayor Pro -Tem
** Council representative to
Advisory Committe
Centennial Commission
Edinborough Development
I -494 Corridor Study
Advisory Boards /Commissions
SWSCC Chair
Liaison
Council representative to
Appointments Chair
LMC: Program Planning
Municipal Legislative
Strategic Planning process
Centennial Commission
Committee
Government Affairs
Commission
Centennial Commission Member
Community Action for
Committee
** Co -chair - Edina School Board
Suburban Hennepin (CASH)
A11M: Government Affairs
Community Services Task Force
AMM: Revenue Committee
Committee
School liaison
AMM: Board Member
Housing.Committee Chair
Metropolitan Task Force re
Effects of Baby Boom on
Housing Market
* Mayor will ask for assistance from time to time to serve on this committee.
** Committee will be dissolved in the reasonable neak luture.
VIII.A.
Glenn Smith
Recycling Commission
Heritage Preservation Board
Board of Appeals &
Adjustments
Citizens Committee for
Braemar Sports Comples
Centennial Commission
City /School Liaison
Regarding liaison to the City's advisory boards /commissions, it is not necessary for the Council members to attend
every meeting. However, they should keep abreast of what they are doing and respond to any questions or issues raised.
VIII.B.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland
FROM: Gordon Hughes
SUBJECT: GOOSE CONTROL PROJECT
DATE: May 29, 1987
On the evening of May 28th, Bob Kojetin and I conducted a public information
meeting.concerning the proposed goose control project. Dr. James Cooper
of the University of Minnesota and the Agricultural Research Station made
a presentation concerning the population dynamics of geese and outlined
the proposed management program which involves capturing geese during their
flightless period in June and subsequently translocating captured individuals
out of state. (You will recall that we briefed the Council on this'procedure
and provided them.a detailed report of Dr. Cooper's findings on May 4th.)
Thirteen residents attended the May 28th meeting. All attendees appeared to
be in favor of initiating the proposed program. No one spoke in opposition
to the project. One gentleman expressed a hope that the program would reduce
the goose population, but that geese should not be eliminated entirely. Dr.
Cooper answered many questions concerning the biology of geese as well as the
viability of other control measures.
Bob and I invited everyone attending the meeting to express their views to
the Council on June 1, either in-person or in writing. Again, our perception
is that all who attended the meeting favored the program.
Recommendation
We recommend that the City Council authorize the Agricultural Experiment
Station to proceed with a three -year program of goose translocation. The
annual cost of the program is estimated to be $3,266. We expect that part
of this cost will be defrayed by donations.
GH /sw
e
VIII.C.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney. & Council Members
FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: 49'ERS 1987 CONTRACT
DATE: May 29, 1987
For a number of years, the City of Edina has participated jointly in
labor negotiations with Local 49 of the Operating Engineers Union who
represent the City's Public Works and Park maintenance employees. These
joint negotiations are done by a committee which represents not only
Edina but also 22 other cities through the Metropolitan Area Managers
Association (MAMA). Over the years, we have found that this representation
of. the cities through this committee provides for metropolitan -wide consistency
in dealing with economic issues as proposed by this union.
This year, the Negotiations.Committee has negotiated a 3% increase in wages
and $10 additional contribution toward the employees health.insurance. This
settlement is within the budgeted amounts that the City of Edina anticipated,
and it is the same percentage of increase you granted to the non -union
employees. I recommend that the Council take formal action to approve
this increase to the 49'ers. This would conclude the City's participation
at the master contract level.
As part of the total labor agreement with Local 49 and in addition to the
master contract, each city has what is termed a local addendum to the
master contract. It is within this addendum that local issues are agreed
upon. This year, at this time, we have not agreed to a settlement of our
local issues. We are still negotiating and hope to bring a settlement to
you for your consideration as soon as possible.
KR, CS /sw
.VIII.D.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: May 29, 1987
FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: ACE'Award
The "Edina Police Report" has brought home an Award for Cable Excellence
(ACE), cable television's highest recognition for local cable programming.
The series, produced by members of the Edina Police Department since 1983,
was one of 34 winners nationwide in the annual competition sponsored by the
National Academy of Cable Programming. It won in the Program
Series /Informational category. Producer Eric Felton and program host Chris
Hamren were on hand to accept the award, which was presented May 18th at
the Las Vegas Hilton Showroom. This is the Police. Department's second
"ACE" award; their program was also honored in 1983.
CRAIG G4/ SWANSON
CHIEF OF POLICE
CGS:nah
a.
VIII. E.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian
SUBJECT: Swensens Restaurant Update
DATE: May 29, 1987
Since May 6, 1987, eight inspections have been performed at
Swensens Restaurant, 127 Southdale Center. Swensens Restaurant
has passed all of the inspections to date. The scores have
ranged between 81 and 95. These inspections were performed
pursuant to the Edina City Council action on May 4, 1987 at which
time the Health Department had requested revocation of the food
establishment license because of repeated inspection failure.
During deliberation at the license revocation proceedings
the City Council was informed by the owners of Swensens
Restaurant that the establishment was being sold and this change
of ownership would take place on or about May 28, 1987. In light
of this revelation, the City Council offered to allow the
Restaurant to continue operating if the owners agreed to the
following conditions:
1. Post a $2,000.00 cash bond.
2. Agree to pay $100.00 per inspection every third day
which will be deducted from the cash bond.
3. If the restaurant fails any of these inspections,
the Health Department will immediately close the
restaurant and return the unexpended portion of the
$2,000.00 bond.
4. Upon transfer of ownership, the City of Edina will
return the remainder of the $2,000.00 bond which
had not been expended for inspections.
As of this date, the restaurant has not changed ownership.
The tentative date for the change of ownership is June 4, 1987.
The Health Department has been contacted by the prospective buyer
and they have obtained a license application. I also understand
that the new owner has completed the requisite training from
Swensens Corporation.
:.a
It appears that the change of ownership will take place
pending the approval by Southdale Center of the new owner.
However, the exact date is uncertain at this time because
Southdale has not been formally notified of the pending change of
ownership. .
I intend to continue inspecting.Swensens until the change of
ownership takes place. However, I believe that one inspection
per week would be appropriate at this time due to the
improvements which have taken place at Swensens Restaurant over
the past four weeks.
1-i -,, , , � . " , , -, - , -.;� - -,
.:.,., '. - . .1. ". '..., '. �-- , . .
. . - - - -�1,4. ','��, --� I , -
. I - , . : ,- . ". - . , ,.- , - -,I o, , ".., --,,:- , -, . i. - - j.- .� I
- . 11 I , . -. . - �� . , . " '. .. ., -_1 - - . ,,�," '- --.-, k.. .. " �
. I - I - � . , ! - , " -; , 'o2 , , -,
. I. "; - � , - - , : 1, . - : .. , 1 ". ": -,, -'. - - -,- - - � :., ,1 - -
-1 I . : I ,� ,� - , : : , - � - .:, - - , . . .
- ... x .. .. . . ,� .. � .. - -,� .1.. I � - -T j 1� , .::,.: "'.
- ': � '" � " ..,. .- . . - . - -
, , . � ..� .� . -
- , , . , . . . . . I :-..:; - , . . - . .
" -: , .��., -.-.--:�- . -.,.. - - . .".. -.-. I --a" .� . -... . .11,"..', , . I I.- -,:-� " ---r-�'1-4--, -,,
: � I - , . . - ... ;.-. . I ,��. - , ,. � � . 1. F.. . .. " ., - - . -"... , � - -�','.
� . - - , , '7 ', , "I - ,
.";..,. - " � ... �;-t;;A:1� i-.-,.',,,,'- ", - .
� , - '�� ,-J-� -, �� -""- -.,,, -,
. , -, -,;, -,-;`��:-,I-t-,. .",...�.`
- I N T ..� R E C 0 R D ' - -"' "' �- ".-`;�--'--, -
' 1 1 ' ' ' '. .'- - � " '-- - � - - -
.
C 0 M
PLAIN L A -Z�11 �
. ., - I . ,
,-�� .,�
. I - . " - -,6!;,r'1-�'-',-'.1."--,.
-- -;,.,-,.,-�-.-x .-'.' . , , ,.,, --�.e �
- I` -�`� , " �4,�-C-f.---�-*
r- . .. - ",-k--,.- - ,�;'-'i-^-t-rl,,.�ip�
- ,_�I--'-�-:,`,��,�, . . , .
. ... - � !,:'i , �, t - ��,Z ot,' N1,
..��` "? .11 -1',
,-,.,!;.,,;' !-,-, - �-` - -..,:.-�:Eclina Health Department '�---',. - - ';f�z,,, Y-.",!5*.,--,i1',�".--,!- ..
;,� " �.', . " �; � � ..-, i. �t , . , , , - �
- ..-.-:,i-.. -��-, I - � �N,X-�
i -. , , �. "'. -, ,. ',,i,�,w - �, '. , "..*W, I 4
- , . , ", .
; .. , -',' -, -, ..-1,1, ,-- . - I. I �..-. -- ."; - ".1 ,,;- - -� „%
..”. � - .. ,... . � i- -,.., .� . ��.
)W�P,,��,'�!-,
. w
�
,
�,� ',-,,..,
,-
, - - .-;� . .1 i% " ,,, -, t', -,: .- , ", . , . - , , !" P .',t - -�- - - IQ -,,�7 �i�* -.1, : " .
- . - � - ,-",- -� - -4i "
- , -,� � �� ?,�,-r"..1-- I .., , , � , .....- , '. ,.,,-,.,����,-'�".:;:::�-;!Z�'!,--'4 ;-"y , '...-' � ., . -
.� , ) . , . . - - .. '1� , . - ,
- -?"., , � ,.---� -, �- " ,--"---- :-,-"- �,�-,�., , , �� . , - -;, 1- �,j.,�!- �, lf� - -,��. -.-, 11. ;11_�. , . I P
� -�'�---,-,, -1 ,� " ,.- � � '-# 1�,�,'!�,: �' - � -.,�.` � V, .. Date. ./O .-. ,- �,.,. - . - - -, �t,-, -
---,,,;�- .,-. -.-�' "'. -..,. -. , -� .!!�. I 1, I',' 1-j---"� -; - - . : ,-. '. �1-p Ir" 7 :4 -
.', '. " , � - - .. --;4 - -,-, - , ).111 . ,;�-; .4 M
,
, ; , M. � . -- ,,, -; , --y- ,�,. .;
- ,�. , - !� ", �.� . , .A
; I ..,�.-, -.--..- ,.J.--:,-,-�..":� t,,,�_ -:�*,.�z";�":"?.!". - ...� - . . lf� -1 .3
,- _ . - ,�:�- '.. � ."',
I , ,',,---r.--,;. '�"-.7",�":,-,--�����'-.!.,,,,�l-r-,�,��i -.,�, i - � - �s - .,�,,;,, - -;;,- . � .- ,,x, �, -�
` - ,-�7 .", - , � - '' -m� "", � -, - -:-, ', - - -,.. - ,r.�- t , "' it' "),�.,� - , '- - O - -q!� ,--�-- --��,*- ..
- 1.11 - , - � -:, , �..--,.--,�", - -,q . "', , - , " , �, ".'17' ..,
,i Q .;, - -' ., . - - - .;8�,
" . , '. , .1 � . "
- - , -t,.- , `�Q. �- - z ,- - "j -S M � ..,Q
- . ,,.,�;,-,, V� - -. "
� tl� -.;I- I I....
- .. I , -�'., i - - ��11 �
, - ,:i: � ".i. - �, � ,1Cf,X,, � *�t -`5 �--. .�. - I W ` t.
--V:�',- Annr%+ :.'r,��;'t',�.'�.,,,At�-,"�,�-I �
- -�� .�� "�"T . . . �,
- , oc .- ,Z" "e---zl -' �,4. -�� . --.
. , , --- -g
,
,;
�
, 'I
I � 0
.1 ". '-- .I:. -. ,,� -�.'. -,-.-,�"�J�. �--- - 1, , --i-, �
1, -j--i - . . , ��41��-:�',,-�.,-�4;..)
. . " " - :4 i.f� 4.j . Z�-'- .��.�, ,1j."1vt- I I I 314.iZgza��' .
- � . --- . .. . ,,.,,.,, , " - X
-5 . . , . -g
1. V� CrN S e- 4� < -1 UZI - . , , ,
L ., I I -, I'. - - - 4
11 11( -� ,,
. � ," �
-
- - -S -3 L . R " " ,
.". . ,
�`.,�"�' I . - --. ; � � �, �,- ; - -, - - `1
,j - - - -
., - ;;.- ..::.-�'e",,t�'.5.,:,�,-;..��-�� -- ,- W,--!6
-�- , , '. � . . . , , A- :-.�.��
.- . , , .; , ,- - .� '1�1 I - '- t '; I , , ,---',;,�-. ).,,��,�d-?�,--. � , . 1'1z�- I , -- ::a�� ��' . � . , ,- ,
, .. -1.1- r, , -1- ".-,, '. -177.77.177 -,-,,.�,�.;----'-- . . - T> v .i� . .
. :) -.. 1� - , , , - . , � 24W�-,K ?�?� �',Ji,�-
. :, . , , - - , -
7:��; , .�- - ,�,`; -
;�-� : 11.,� -- :- ! : .. - � Z.; . , �Ai.-;--i; V,-'- , ,r--- - ; t-�� - , --.. I
- -
" ,�. , ,-� �-, � . a.� , - ��z
.�--. �- - - ��-",--�, ,., � --.-�, , -, , , I
. - .. .,�,,,�� � . � .
� - - .., , I ,,"�4� . , Or, 0.
7--,---��-�A wner: ---:-,,-4.-.,',,-- . - -�, ;� 1.�':i . t
" 11 ��,;, . , , - - - k , --,
. .. - . I . . I . - � , ,
" �. m- - �,'- `;,�, .1 -;E'l -.-,�� ,,,..,4,,-t,.
-- . - �' -:'Addres -' !' .1 1*.----t'.--'-' , -J�,,,!:�, ., ,�,,.'i!�.qtr, ,
- S. . -.--,Y-'P�:��, . - ,r,, , - �--j;�
- .. . .
- - 1� Q, , , " ,
;.--,,',— -k.',1,;-.,.,�-1 A, ,
i ":., 4- • � :.F,- �"Fw- ,W
�- , � , I . 'S
. I 1��-.z
- . -, - �� VAP�, -;�-&- e.,,,-
. - - - , , 3. - �,, . "i -1
..- ....I:'.:.-,:'�:��4, . I i -, : , ; ": �. , � Z�, -�?- - i -,�.' '. -.[.�-.s .'?..
' , �.� , , ,� " - - ,74,.,�, -�p_�.',,. , -.O;�,'.7t,� ,,,, ', _ 'l,,'j,�,r. � - . , Ee_z�-�,vj
. , - I , -
�W. , <, P", 1_- "" .1 , , ;. , -- , ,,, k -.. �, . "
--:� l I - . . , -, Ir - ,:���.,�"-".�-i�i.:!,�T�,�z-�.,-,.,-�. -?'Dr ?".,% . •
. � .;, I , t
* f �,,�--.., ,-P, . ,� 3"-� , , ., , .,;Z� . . .
. 7 - ;�� � - .1 I I - � � '. pI, -- �" ;' I W� ., . ,4 � -
- I .. . - � , , .
- � � , � .-- - 4 -�.�',', ,,,,, ,., - ,4j?,.
- ., 1, � -�.' I , � , - '&�..�,. �
�,,��. .;, . I . - ' ' �` � - . , , 'IR - x!P
. -,,r'. -, I 41 - I - .
. I., .; - - -��.1..,Co` .. . -.. � ,-I�, -?f, , ,,, �.'
.1. -,'", mp ainant: - I . -v - , - �,�
- 1,. � LVNI �;t- I .. . . -4.",�-':,;F _,-, ` -�; ----,*� - -,;. -;;37-,�-- 1
- - T- ; - , Addres S-"--�".' . '; .. - r -
- - , ", — ;� ,.-., �-,,- I -
'.." .i - � 14.�- I --.��:."�! --v, �ik�% %- 1 � -.1.
-.-�.,. . -1..----;.-1t -- - ,��-
I-. 1-1 � �
r
,-W-'-�;--,.L�' -��..-�, -,. � . .�; - 11: , i ,
- ,
., ,,..-. . -.,,. - - - - 'Y 1z. �i, - -:� �
-
.1.. � '.,. , �.��',- . _j i I �'.....
..' --,.,N. . . - - L I - .- -,;-. �. -.,�- -� , 1_,,.�? t','�t�_�. ;�..� I � �C�,t
-,3i��,;-,,::� - .4 - -. '� -,.. . �:" 'I.L 1.'1;)Z11,. 4�e- - -, � .�N-
--��.,� `r1;1., . � - _ z4,t,!-;P,,, """ r� -;--,c- ,; I;$
., � . � v� 'IN, .- .. I
- -.1 -
�,&,!.- - , �" .- .�, � ,
, - ephone':';-,, I � - -t�','- Received b - a�,`..� . ,�r-y,tt%'$i�,,;?-�,��
, :. I - YZ -�",/ .1,1�w
. .: ��` z ` R -1 -,!, ';` _ ,
- - --`t12r-%-,;, ..�'. ,
,
- , - Tel - - . ., � , . , f. �,-,,� .,t-.W--?,�� , -
- -,
- -'.1., :.A I . - �,,��, -
ly'; I -',- 11 '� . . -.. -,--��., - —D PI/ -,:t." --w : I , --�i:1'1�9-7N !�,��I`t.,,
." 1.11 - .- � — -- -�,., "
��.--c�""-."�- - - -.-- - - , .! �,�4, ime ' � v1.,'
- I . .� ;.
- , - -.- , - -. - . . v
, -, ,.'-%�.,-, S '! , .
__ - -.-, .,I , 11,
-:;-.. , - . , I' - ,�, , � -
. , ,� .... .. . .,,,,, ,,��-,. ", -,;.,--�. - .'-,i7.-.:.-�-N -.1.-, , , -
_ 1. �,,',71%" �- - �� � ,
- I --.- ,-',��;z -,,.- ', , ''a, I � - ,- ,
-, Na I . -, ,;', --..!�;,l I - . ;q,_.,._- � � .1-V ,--� gh;44-,� , ", ik� �, - , -W.",
I I .", . $ �, � " t , �1 ,�-.
- _� " � � . ;,. _ � �,.,,.� .., - r-.l '�-.,', V'4;7', W�!?�12,1.,.Z,, 71,0*w., "Su"N.1- , :;;-,
-1- - -1.
Nature of Co . ,4j,.�2Q!,,-,r �:" 'L,L,-'- L'O.� _ ,�., -, ,,.�-.. - , t .� i�- V, �� -, ! W
, - ,�- - ft -
� ,e
--q- -.,.� '- '� - -4.�k-11-1-i,1 . t ._� I
,-, -1'1�, �- ;', ,1, 1 �, " , ., , . X , t
,�-,�,,41,117-, � -'� .., -, -.. , - I ., -.7. .
. -?� -,� Complaint , , , ,I , r, - - U -;.--,,- -� - "I�, tNt- -L',, i. zj --- � , ,
'n - . , -,I,n.: .i,41, Q ;,�
. .. ,t, �. .. - � , Q , .
- �, , -- ", - I . 1. -�:,. - , ,,jl�-. - , .. _ ,�.. 'T � " ': _. �j
. -,. , .. � ,A , ,2.
�, -.1 ,,, - ,,, . . 1. , - A",
-., , , `�' 3 "' , -;� " Y)�� �,- �, et. ,. - -4,
",''%'+ "'.�-.',,'� " . - - -. e 24,01 j
, I " 1, "' � . -:.;�- ` -- ,-- , . - v
� � ". ..4, ;.L-1,-., - �-- � - -.-;����- �,e�,��4�,�",,'�-�W�;i�'-,,. . .Y.. --.,, .-
- ;,, , - - .�,-. --i- -'.:U� Vi `..-�. '' r ", '. , . --,-;-.. ."-- . ., , I
5.1� /-' --,.. t - .�-%�.%- I . .. - � -1 I
, ,
, ,W
. .. -, "! I-- � , , , - ,�, - -. - -- '.. " '11.-e�-�f,W-. I ��: ... -
k " % � . I � .��
, ' , , 4'.. , .Z. -,... 1�� - i . , . I V'i!,�., 1.
,�
- - -
I - -�.�- r'N ..�.! - I . �,�:,�.':�,-.�- -'L 5 " -11 , , , -,� ." - . '.. �-�� `� IN , O � - -
, ;Zk .. " - .. . .. �,J, - -,I 11,-'A� v - � - - -:'O k , - P -1,
'. - I - (-� . . , ... 1, i .. .-- I- - , , tit' ��T,:�,��", 3 - . Z1,
. . ,�& .
' '. ' . I I .. . - . -1.. , 1-21",
� - ,�x�� ,"L'�',�4�-),'I...f��,�-���,-;..:,- � ; - - ,-, .�� I ". - J-1 r ,�,� ),.,I- ;, ,� , `;��, �,, . ..k�.,�O�t..�-� .., .. M �# r � , 'm " "',
`�'.- .. ckl - . " , - - -.1 - , ..., .. . , , . x
, , V - , � � , %� � - � -:!Y, - - - . . ,� r 'O f , '4
�",t!;.'ve,-,�,1'T'x,.,p 'P�.�� - -,- .-,�,," -) --I � �� ,� ,., , ,;�,:, ,* " " ,j
- " -,; . , , " ",�-,,- ,�!�r-,t�--,�-.,'.-'�?, � `-t.;i,-2'.-!O*Z- 2.i-,�- "I '411-v� 'N I-
-
P.,.") - "'! , . �.� . : " " ., , , -� . . � . ,
-77-� � - - � I ." T §V, , I - :-W
- p , , . � , ;,. -.4 -
I 'I -,-_., 1.,;,.� - 1� . .-" ;'-- �� .7 -� , , � eiiz .. -'Tt 64,1"Mv-,��:-
. i !", `�, - 'A', �),.,
I '�.- t-'.-,� "t. , -I . .- -,,;� . '.�,�,` ,-.--j-,-, " '-� -
- `�.; . �� . 1:�:� " :-- � .�! .1 -.,� .,� 5Z%"�-,���:,.-V,- t-4,, .� .1 -"- . d 'r'431--'Ir�4"
,� .'- .!, ;-7 - , " �, ,111 � 41. ,,,;,,, - AW"', .'--'1;�-,A , , V. - ,� ��A . ,
- ,�; - , ", � -., i� 'a, - �;�.�� �f; � .*.�,;i�
, I.' - , V, �:, , 11 - I 4. . M . -
_ . [ r, _ �
,,�' 3.-,4-., �. '. :' -1� -1; -, .11 . I I I 1: , - , I .- O!", ..� -,i,f '�" �ir L - 4'
i I . I � � I. ,� -.. .;w- 63��
�-,,� ".�';,j�.:�, I I
, % GI.S
I 3
. -
-,�S 4 . , "'.. � - ', 1.�, ", A -, '- ,:�'��,��'.'�-
I CL;�,-,,".- - - ,1: 1,1 -1'1,.i----
� I � -. �, ,.,
�---.-. .','-
' � - ... — v�-- — 1, . �- -- . .. �. .. -.-1 .. I- ,- , - , � ,
e
' '. A / I ,N)'-�.7�1-,'
- ", .,.� " " -
� 1: ,:4 � "'
.'�-'--'1-�--'-k'.t - -- ',�. 1-'.�;1, zzi � "
". ,1 ,,:I-, 771, � ' �, , v kl� , - —
. -, . - ..- ,�. .re � . �, I-
.. -,
, -- .Jj.�j ..t.
- - - .. . �j , ,
" �-, �-111-41,
- ... ... ., o- '-,,',.",,4 , '��,�
.11,117-1 , '. , - -
) ,�-, -".-'--,-:--�,,-t-<;�.,;
%!4,-- ,
-j-:: , , ,-�,,-,,-','�,�-.,�
.1 - A .
� j , -I- -�.l .. ,
- � I : ,1 -,I,,;.
-0,, 1. - ,..".
.,.,- j, , , ,�21"�)"'.'-'.
�
. � �
�� , f
, , - -Y-,,�-J.
-:
. I ;.� ;
:1114 , 6 �(,
-.191 ?N P, C) - K --�� "
.1 ..., ..:. -
I
, . I - ... , ., -. I
,-."-I-
,
-,
: �A.�.,C-1-11-1 -
��,
.
--
-
- �s .1 �
. .. - -
-.. —; t- .-...,...s
N-
�
-
I ;, �i
� , I.,- ;,:-�-�;-,!�,-,,-i,� , ",-,_1
I . � . -�` -, " ��- , - " 1, ' - -
r '
Report of Investigation
,r - .-.,:%,"-' "-�"�111.�-.'-:,;--�,
. - - , - -�--- '-
- :�:--.-?:�,. ."", �-�- , ": --,'� , .. . ,
— - , - W i
?, -!, 1,',�,�,-. -, ', ,-;,
,
,, �T,
. .
I 1�
. I..
I ,�
� , � '. , ',', :-..
� . ,
. � I . � . A
.. I
� �: - ., - -'. . . .-, �,, ,.,,z,--,- -�.-,-,r ,;,�',
, . .: _, 1 ., ,�,.fe-,
�
-.-I - I . V11 �, ; ,- - � . ,M, -�,j�,-, �'.,
J-.� , �i - - - - ,� -7� - ,V
- .k., :`�-,'
." "....
4 - I..'-, - . , 1 I �. ,,-. �!;, - . �.
;k" ;�":,,
-�'-,.--,-, ,- ,� - , .;Z� i4� '.';�I)
.
;;,,%�,,� -'.-' 5,�.�,�,.�.-,J.!P�
. -.--
�Lll� A - � ''' �'..-
'
--! -r..,,.,.' . -.,.' ... ,t'�-�,4':
'� ':
7-1, -� - 1. :. .b."--:-; it"t
'. � . �
- �t.' -... .1
. � , ": � -, . - :�
- , , ,
- ': ,,..��'. �:,. . ,..'�
� ,;-�;,.: " - ' �,, � .. .''. -f..-- -
',.--'�- .i,-, - . i. I I - "-,'�;
, I I ,�.- ,
'C s- -, � , -. . .J-, ,, � ,
, - w - �:-,�
- -� -.1 , � - -
.." - . ;. . r . I I � 1> .'-��,j� ,
;..�. - , � ,-.,�J
-
. , , z ,
': ��.� I!,Y,! A
� .,� ,. .
. 4 � j"C 1. �-". P. ,
. � � .,� , ,�:
I 1,
1-�-Nbl'
I ,
. -
'4' -V*,� 'j'o,v,
�
. 'W ." -4:, � "io, I!, I
f-,-��, ,,,4.v"N I ".., 1;4A,
4.!��-�, . I- , -.,
, ,.-�'j
- " I - I A'-
: _:", .-',Z.--�,:-".".-',1;.,j(,
. ..
�-,,.,-- .
.� - I � ,---.'-,.. .
. -. �, , . . . . . . :�,� , �4:,,- ;',
t � , ... Yii � - "; ..r -�,,.1-',-!,C ,
,.; 11). , - , ,�
- -01
, ,
I . .
11 , % � - .
� . . . . , ! . i - 'i . . 10�41
- '
;: , , ,.,,,- -f�,-., _ - -, ,-�, 1��;�'�.j:l "e4,W-e�'��..�'�C,.:��-1111V `e .,k 1 � - �,�., � ,;�. �.'-, --.1 I,-- .e.f4��,:�OIZMO..
�
, ;7 _� . .. - - , 4� �.
, , , . . . -, t;, -
,. - , . '. . , � - -1- I., - -. - ,
- � , , P ,; -� � . . .
. 11 - , � ,--.! -� .-,, �,.,� " - ,-. � . I � -� ,"-- -4"' `,t.'. . - - �
- " � I . v ... , , .'-- -� ,- '4�
� . - - - .- � -1 �; " -.
.11 .1 -� � , -,4v� �j, �-.t-jtt,-;,,*-. . . .1,1,,�,� -,--, �-,, -,;.,, rt .1 f . - �e - * �11t'-]i �i.:�1,1,51 tl- � I;r,f - � 9 , '� , "�- I I . r
-1--11 , ., � " 'i.,), . - � 5 .�;-4.-
-Xj , , I ,,, . .. - - " , . -I.- . , " v, , - � � ��', , A;�. ,, ,4--,�� ". �>" .- -? .C-;�," -4,:,� , �- ,
- - - -j;�; '.��- ,-,..',��-, ,� -'�.,.-:�-, ,!�- - " 1, -. , , -I n- " 7� ,A ?, %, � " � I ,,, g , - -, . �gl '5 @')},. -
- - - , - 'r - -; -i�; --;er1,.iZy Qa, . -9", r-�.;,- .,� ;k, `c' -
. � , ,� , ,,.�z � - � ,,'-' ; ;. - -, . .-..I..' .;1: - , � , '. � . � - , -C - - r', t •.f��. i� , - . . ,, 0-� ,
� , , ,,� .-I
-
. -: , " -� �,, - ��-� , , ; I -I' � -e� -70. ,_�"" '* , ,� ---- , , , , 1�-,.,,.,.,, r,,,..-�,.�,�,-,�,.,.,,,,,;., �.-,� :.�V:,
:�::J: , , . -�,�,�i; . . � , , , V, .
. - .. f " , . . �,�-.' -. - :",, -*,-, , , -1 .; " .." , - -
': -, _ , ' ._ ' �� - .J�V- �Jg, ,
, . ",:,��,;-6;:-;", ,- -,,�,.-, - ,i-�-`�i�� �i .,.. -, i� , ;
. � , i " � . �-� - , - , , , - I F ,;� - I 1�1 -�6- -� .4
I , , I ,�, - - .
.� ", ,. , " , % ,,, , ---, . -,��',,��',' Z -,.,�',' .. --?,� �',-:- - -, �,.-- - �',P!��i!,J., .;h�,i� "; "". _ il ,., .", , , , " ,.i , ,V ... ,.,(..,.:
, � 4. .,A , I... .r. �:,. I I . " � ,.;�' ." '. ��., - - I - . ;., " "; :,��j-�'�,,.',"': a 4 jy. -�
, '� ,, '�,- � ,;�� .'�.;,�,'Z-i `,�, 1.-r .. - . . , . - - , ,'-Z -,-,I.it'3�� ;
.�`--- 'e �f;', -� :,: .., k
. ;. .
-- r' , I' 7 -1.,- 6, -, - - - , - , . " �. . ,;r-,....
-, ., ,;,� , , �,-, ."-' -; rL' ,' - -,.,
", , � , - .." - , 1,� , ,.�:�,-',� , " - "', '-�?S�,- ..� . � . ,zr .41 " , , . - - I
- T" , - - - , - , , -,� ", ., � ,� -,.-,� _,4* ,�-,,.4 �_-, .� , ;,
I I., , .: ,'-� --V 7: , : �. - j. ;-,,-� -Wt�- -, i , " � �'. 1� . .
, � _ 4 , "!"T,:�,t'. ,,,�t�?',' , � ,11 1,--X� - -I-A&,.�� P � -g,A,--,�-4e,� -, ., ", 't-Y, �2 " � ,A' :-�� - - ., . . ""
, - , - � � , - , - 1. I , �t, , ,-PN, .- -.. v
, . , - - - - 1 4%�, �i -,-" �, N 'I, � ` "
� . , ;� ,._ ; � '�' , 5 , 4 � , - 7 , � � -
" - � - �' �77�1 �,� '13Z MY; ILI -- :N1,21"'114., ... , --`Z�.M',�'��'i�
7 , .�,�� . - . ;. .
.Lzr, ,;.V1-1',,m ., I ,...;. � �� ,,�--,- ,,-,�,.r,�i�'1,4;":"�.- ,. ,.,,�L � , �,;,- %`�;,-, -k; �
. , �§,;�- ,., , -�: ,-, " '-,'-, � ;�,- j- , . - - J, J - . 11 ' .4iZ�. � . , . , ..,
,�,kt�-, A,,, 'N'n% . �,--�,-- ,� %C.; - , -,r>,.. , , -, ,�'!,,' .- , I ,.z ".1 � �! VA ,
, . , , . I � 14 � I � • Z - I - 0�4,-.Xli.K�;."J�'��; :,'.-� Y
'1;-;,�.i 11;,111 i'lzlj�-Z,';,,.;;�4 t.,�:�',:-�.Oe��,,', ,?J,)� .-, . , - --I;' '.4 "; , -
- . .1 , . -��, -;,-�--O-��".:-` ,W . .gr
,C� ` -1 " , r� - F"�7, 1 - : ��` - ,,.,,�W�, �---, 2� ;�!:�1 .1 , ; , - I 1;1 It I I -, , , : . . ,- - I I"- �. . ,-.i.-,. ,Al�l
. . - -.` ' W, .., - -- , - I ,. ---.1- - .�: - ". . I 11. , - "' ; 11 - .. 134
2 � . I , - "
'; - ' �.,':.'-,', --1-3-L't., ; ;, , - �- ;i? �.
�.
- , � �$ , A , 'N . , � - . ., ", . , �. E - ;� ,,- ". ,?P. - ��'4 1 .-
., . .-.� ': ,��,:,, , 41 ,.-.�.o - �,-- ; A, .-, �A, " - "i , � .. . .1 . -
� -1 -t� , ,2 - - , ,� o , - ,
, , '. ✓ �� , - . .�� ? . . - .,- :4 6- �� , .",%I. " , , �,:: ;. , ,j�� ,,�i
. - , .. i . . - ,
- . . - . � L-� . ", ",`-. - "t - --. � ,, ,�'��, "',
- , �.j4,� .,,..� W%'U� �- , " 'k - -V '$,' 1 .-, �-... _-j",.
, I - k - .�,?�,-� - �, �,..�., .. - " ...- �
�..-,�, .'.--i', , f , . ��, -� -
, - -1 -1 '. -I-, ,.-Ill . , t .011 --�, ,-- 2 -, -1.
"� -, -, � � bi - 1, �
" - ,-Y-Z-, '. . , - . - . 1.1-� .��--.`,M-,.. �,-y. - , I 11 , , -, � ,& R - -�Y_, � * , t�V, --, '. •
. . I I - .
�.' " , -_'_., I I '.' -r- � � � � �W,Y-'� . �. :z ", % 5.,J .'��,- , - - --.. -- ' '�� : -�i?,. . i lk�'. �W - -, .. " - , , -1 ;, 1 --
- � . � , ,- , . , - �,,��, � ,�. -_,, � � -," �-�Q, je,- ,,.,�-�� ,--,�.,, -� , .. , k I, : i I
�,,; .�, '. r, . . ,�'. � - , �,. . J� -, , - - - , 4 1 , - , ;�-��,� �
"-� , ;- , ,;�'; '� . " -'q-��jf)�,.-:- �-'�4-:-,' - ;-,- , ., .-- 5+.. ,,:, , , � � J�',�,.?4,K :,,'�61 �",4 -Ni,��;"& *-: � I
I . L ,., , . ,:. - , .. . . . . - , , :� � 11, - , .,e,' ...., ,.r*,� , ", _"-, I,- ",
. �. . ;- 4 . .. , -, . ".,� . ,� i, ,� �., -. . . -3 1 .. 3 -, , -tl� ,4. -�-.
"'-. � , , � , � , , � � , -. " "�, , �, sA'-� ��'.�, , .-r,- -,-�- - - ,,.,, � "' -1'.11'1.^,r' -�,�'. 1::-,-"-- � � �t� ; .v - . . , ,4
...,""r., , ; ,, ,*jT, , ;�, k-11 - - �
, , , " I .1, -, . , I .� �Ir;, ,.,.'�., !�; = , - ., � i -,<!. �. ,:�e, I ��, -', ;,, 'j--, . -, ; , r" , ,
, - . ,& " �' " ; �%'..'.��, ,�&:Z?, ;� ,�'. . - , � A - ,�
I ; ., � .. , I . . I � - , ". A , r.: .. �'? - - - . - . . . , , , �7k
_ . . - . ,V W, I - '. , ,� . , f. -�;,�, --' ".
,.-' I- Z.- ,;( " ", , .,�
-.�--., - ,. ., . ;
� I �., , ,
- � ,1 I - - . . , "". �
_. .... .. ,,,.��,, , "" .. ; '- �'41; '�, 1. Xtl; .'j�; �- , , - - , -, , ,.� -� i -,'. � , - � �-�' � , �.'�-,:, 1;�- o:-` - �.'--" �,� ,". 1 , .- -. � -17 . , - ' - - - - -� '. . . , !:, I - - - ...
_ , . , , . - . . , - �, ��C-, , - v - . �, -..' 1�'.- !;�z7 � -.�4.�, , ., '1, -, :,� -�. .. , � , - . - '-.. .1. , ,
, �., , 'r�tc-,C,,�,,, - .,; ,,-, ,,O� , �.; I -� �� , - - - - � , - ". . , - .,, , , - ".. - , � Y.i��!�,--�'%t.�,,' i
,�. " . - - " " " , -� �, , , . �; , - ` . . 7- " .�'� PT�1, � , '�XAIIOI�I'Ail�ll � I I .1 --- � �
', j , . ,W . . -, r,,r
- ,N�*f.��;'.`-,,�,�' , " - I- 't ,�. 1�-r ,,A -1 �. - -'� 1, - - ',-. , , , , ".: z.',� '.,� .4 - _ .. .�
� , " , , . - - . - - - -, ,T,. Z�,- ',C, -�-J,� A ,� I N-1 ,�04-91V-;!:" . 1, -;,.11,� L '�� I -
. , . , v ", -, . �, � ; ��': ��-, 1. .� , , - - -�
. - ; , .. , . �. - , . � - , k.. , �!.--,iv. � ,
. � . , . . " " "I --- -1 � 1, :, . .- " �-,', � , -�,;�. 1- -.1.11111- �- I 1. .1 , � , ;i� $ -',��r -.j�' ,.7, .
� , . , .""'. -'-T' .-C .� -. - . - , ,, , �,-", 'L" 11 � , `� , � -'^1 : _. .... , :�
,,, , - " , " --` ", , , I - .." - ".-. - , � ;� '. . 1, .. I-, I I . , - At� �,�":(,�,4'-,,- .'� ,7;� ,j .
� , - . � , . : ., , -.. ' ^,Z - '.-,!Z ,- - W, �? - -
. - ,- . �, .'." " - . - --- , -. , - ,; - .- - - , , - - . , - .-. . --, , � , . I .
, � , , , :: - , -- ,%IP's -,,.,�,. ;; �c� , , - - ,-�' .'::' . ; ;,-;:." � � � � , , - li 7. ,i! ."-' -� � I ; ., "-..� -, , ,,, .�
-1 ` - I -, - , : � ,-. �
-.,11 - . , . � .. , - , : - ..-.- " � I . ': I " �� r. . " q. r - , % % ,
. , �' --, � . ,.,-,. " ,.� .,-. .--., - " � -- -1 - " :,:� ,��- .4�,;.. . � . - ., - �, - 7 .
- � , " , -i , -',- �, �. "�,----- , I �- . _,", �- . I " a,.� ',.I ,,%� V,-'E. ., - � , � i , .,".1,1. - , " , ,-,- , ,. . : .
. I : " .. " - . ,�, - - - , . , . '. I - .. . :! .
. � . . I , , z �C , I - . �, �. . , - -I � ,;, , _.; I I �, - : . '. - , . � - . , ,�7
.
.. .. - .V 4 , I ": . I . - � :�:,'. .- . " , - .--., , -'- . . . . � . -. . - - . -.- . .., ,�., ."', ,-�- ,1 - - �.z - - . " - �,
- " " -1 :1 I � . , - . , ,.�., "I'-- 1..1-;1Z1, ,,;' . , .. - � - I - � - :. - 7 -, ':' � . - ,. . .
- . , -, .:. � '�' -": . 1. , -1 � 1. '.1 . ,,� ,.;4 , . - . ,.-, . -,�.. ., - � " - . , I � 1, "Y.. - . - .
I . . . - . I"..,:, I -'!,.�.:�� :��l -:: Z.;,( . z ,11, • � �S � ;� -�,- , . . - 1
,� _ ,'..;, r:._ I , . ... , 11:, .,. , � , , ,�.r. '. ',.-, .'.'.!-', "
" , . , " r . . �.. .. -, - , �: . .:";.;:, . . , , .. . � I . •, .*,' . S,
, � ,�'j� . , ,,, , U'-!,ej�z --i��;�.,�,- - . � . - I
- v , .".
, , ��-, I - , ,-."� � , �-��
.. -. � I ♦"; I .., ., I ,- ,, �) -,.. , . ., ., W .
� 1!; � I , I -��1-7�., j,.,Z�,?;, , �. , � , . . , � .. , . - . . "I v� .
I L , , . - " "'. , - . "
.. . r . I , � , ,
I
� �.�- - - - , -, --' - - ,
.. - , I � .
`- ` � ,-,-'; Signed
I � �",�, .�
. . - ,�:- , -� -",lz � � " '4 -.�� -.. '.'-
,
:
Date ��' ,-'��,' . -A " �. ! --f
— I .- , � ', .1 — '. -1 ,1.11-��.?., : :
.-
-.- � - ,;,-", ,�, Z�, - ��—,, s I
,
-.- ,
I
. ,
I : , - . ". - �� . . .
. .1 . . . ` -- , ,- , -,..-, r- , �. 1 -11-,-"*-,0 ..
, . � ' , , , - -1 � � 1, ., � , -, ":, ; , " .1 ...
� - I �� ..,. 1�; 7 I- I -.� .�'11.1-111 '- : , . " . ,
, Action: Letter (Date) : �� - I';-, " Verbal Notice : -`1- -!-,z,��'." 17%4 , 1-��`,!,�, � '' -, -, 4 , -
, �
- L - . I ; t.. � . 1�.�,
� - . """""..'-
- . - . - - - I .
,.,%:�
�".,��..,-'.,�.-�4 :�-;_--_-�,-
'�--j L.X- f�; - , t?' - �,-, - - - -, .;"
"I -
,""', . I.; � �;. ',- . I
. , , .1 I ".. -, .t,%:, . -,�;%
-- ,
- ,
- -
Follow I . . .- . - . . uM .. �M p
DM - . . a� t. e. . ': M . . �
, � i, . . �g n e . . .d ., . � ,
-
�: , 1��. , M ., ��
,- !? .:..;- ,,
Final Disposition: ' • Date:
• Signed: 1
I . . -
� r ;
-
I M . �
'M
M .
I .M
I
--
.
- -
VIII.F
M E M O R A N D U M
...TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
SUBJECT: Well Water Supply
DATE: May 28, 1987
The figures and tables below are projected water consumption ratios and
rates from the water system study completed for the City of Edina in 1969.
CURRENT CITY POLICY
GALLONS PER
RATIO PERSON PER DAY
AVERAGE DAY 1 150
MAXIMUM DAY 3 450
(For single fam-
PEAK HOUR 5 750 ily dwelling)
450 (For multiple
dwellings)
Based on the foregoing design criteria the water consumption for the future
was estimated after 1970 through 1985 when the projected population is ex-
pected to be connected to the water system, as shown in the Table of Pro-
jected Water Consumption.
TABLE OF PROJECTED WATER CONSUMPTION
Maximum day demands shown in this table do not include fire flow.
TOTAL WATER DEMAND:
The design total water demand on maximum day consists of projected water con-
sumption plus fire flow as shown below:
CONNECTED
WATER
CONSUMPTION, MILLION GALLONS
PER DAY
YEAR
POPULATION
AVERAGE
DAY MAXIMUM DAY
PEAK HOUR
1968
34,000
5.1
15.3
30.0
1970
38,000
5.7
17.1
32.0
1975
48,000
7.2
21.6
33.6
1980
58,000
8.7
26.1
40.0
1985
59,300
8.9
26.7
41.0
Maximum day demands shown in this table do not include fire flow.
TOTAL WATER DEMAND:
The design total water demand on maximum day consists of projected water con-
sumption plus fire flow as shown below:
Page 2 of 2 Pages
Memorandum
Well Water Supply
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED TOTAL
WATER CONSUMPTION FIRE FLOW
WATER DEMAND
YEAR MAXIMUM DAY REQUIREMENT
MAXIMUM DAY
1968 115.3 M.G. 3.0 M.G.
18.3 M.G.
1970 17.1 3.0 "
20.3 "
1975 21.6 3.0 "
24.6 "
1980 26.1 ". 3.6
29.7 "
1985 26.7 " 3.6 "
30.3
By comparison, our current population is approximately
45,500 and in 1985
used an average of 7.3 million gallons per day. However, in 1986 (wet year) ,
the average use was 6.4 million gallons per day.
A few other vital statistics to be used for comparison
are - listed below:
AVERAGE DAILY CONSUMPTION: Dec. - 1986
4.4 mgd.
Jan. - 1987
4.5 mgd.
Feb. - 1987
4.7 mgd.
Our current well- system can produce 21.762 mgd. with 6 million gallons in
reservoirs and elevated tanks.
The current'Immahility, we-have is the very short term demand
peaks that usually
occur on a late Saturday afternoon. This results in short term low pressure
in certain portions of the community. We do not sacrifice our fire reserve to
maintain adequate pressure at all times.
I would suggest that a general discussion occur at the
City Council meeting and,
if so directed, conduct a feasibility study for additional wells and for
reservoirs.
FJH:lmb
VIII.G
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works � �L
DATE: May 28, 1987
PROJECT: Request for Utility Easement
Northwestern Bell
Northwestern Bell has requested an easement, fifteen feet by fifteen
feet, on the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Amundson Terrace.
The easement is for the installation of a communications cabinet.
The City currently uses the lot for public works purposes for storage.
The lot was acquired for public use when it went tax - forfeit. The
Public Works Department would recommend granting an easement to
Northwestern Bell for the purpose of a communications cabinet. However,
it would be conditional upon the City retaining its use of the land as
public works area.
Therefore, we would recommend the Council authorize the Mayor and
Manager to sign the easement granting Northwestern Bell easement rights.
FJH:lmb
VIII.H.
MEMORANDUM
TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER.
FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK ��/h '0-
SUBJECT: CLUB ON -SALE LIQUOR AND SUNDAY LICENSE RENEWALS
DATE: MAY 29, 1987
Applications for renewal of Club On -Sale Liquor and Sunday Licenses for the
Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club for the period 7 -1 -87 to
7 -1 -88 are being reviewed for staff.
Renewal of these licenses by the Council is recommended, subject to completion
of staff reviewal /approval and clearance by the State Liquor Control.
v
IX. A.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members
FROM:
Kenneth
E. Rosland,
City Manager
SUBJECT:
PETITION
FOR NOISE
BARRIER
DATE: May 29, 1987
To our knowledge, the attached petition is the first petition that the
City has received for construction of a noise barrier with the cost to
be financed by Special Assessments. On past occasions, City staff has
referred individuals interested in noise walls to either MnDOT or
Hennepin County as the case may be. In our view, the construction of
noise walls adjacent to State or County roads should not be the City's
obligation. However, the apparent willingness of the present petitioners
to pay the cost of the barrier may alter this policy.
If the Council wishes to consider the petition, we suggest that it be
referred to the Engineering Department for the preparation of a feasibility
report for consideration at a public hearing. If, however, the Council is
reluctant to consider this as a City project, it would be appropriate to
discuss the issue and perhaps invite the petitioners to express these
views at a future meeting.
KER /sw
V .. ,1 i
PETITION
IX.A.
TO THE HONORABLE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA:
GENTLEMEN:
The undersigned are the owners of all the property abutting and /or Opposite
T.H. 100 between Minnehaha Creek Bridge and
44th Street and hereby petition the Council to
construct a noise and sight barrier in Edina
to service their properties and to assess 100% of the cost thereof against their
properties. or to determine the properties which should be assessed.
Dated
SIGNATURE OF 014NERS
ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
9ac� c5(_jQQ
Z .4�
C 4 q 6 y� /
q, J �-+�►Y Ilu S � /d L� P
It 4 ti -
May 25, 1987
Ms. Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Ms. Daehn:
This letter is to forward to your attention a Petition requesting the
Edina City Council to construct a noise and sight barrier for the Edina
properties between Minnehaha Creek Bridge and 44th Street on TH100 in
the Country Club District of Edina.
By way of background, we submitted a letter to the Minnesota Department
of Transportation requesting that they review our request to construct a
sight and sound barrier in our area. In our letter, we cited a number
of factors supporting ,,the barrier: (1) heavy noise levels; (2)
disturbances due to car lights; (3) heavy traffic causing houses to
shake with tremors; (4) pollution levels; (5) detrimental effect on an
area that has been recognized as significant enough to be listed on the
National Register of Historic Places; and last, but certainly not least,
a significant lowering of property values. Please see the letter dated
March. 6, 1987 to Mr. William Crawford for details.
As you will note from Mr. Crawford's reply of March 23, 1987, he cited a
1978 legislative law that prohibits the State from constructing noise
barriers along trunk highways where they were not programmed prior to
March 1, 1978. He .did offer to have the State conduct a noise
monitoring study. He also referred us back to the City of Edina for
consideration of our request.
Please refer to Mr. Crawford's letter of May 14, 1987 for details of the
noise monitoring study. Our interpretation of the results is that we
are either at the maximum level (L dBA 65 at 4902 Sunnyside Road) or
exceed it to almost double the max1m0 um level of noise (L1 dBA 69 at
4911 Sunnyside Road) under the Minnesota Pollution ControQ Agency's
criteria. In addition, we greatly exceed the noise abatement criteria
of L10h 60 for areas that serve an important public need and where the
preservation of those qualities is essential. We naturally assume that
the Country Club area falls into this category since it was deemed to
have qualities which were significant enough to be listed on the
National Register of Historic Places.
With all the abate background information in mind, we are requesting the
City of Edina to review our request to build a highway noise and sight
barrier. We believe the State's noise monitoring study verified the
high noise level. Due to this noise level, we are losing not only
property value but are also destroying the wonderful environment and
heritage of the Country Club district of Edina.
Ms. Marcella M. Daehn
May 25, 1987
Page Two
We have attached a City of Edina petition to formalize our request for
the City Council to construct a highway barrier. Ten of the fourteen
households directly affected by the highway have signed. It is our
understanding that we need a 51% majority for the City to consider our
petition - which we have obviously exceeded.
It would be greatly appreciated if you could let me, Ruthanne Holetz, or
Jean Navarro know of our next steps or if you need additional
information.
We are most anxious to have a highway barrier erected to preserve the
quality and heritage of our Edina neighborhood.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
j � /
' :
Pamela Rothmeier
cc: Mr. Glenn Smith Mr. Frederick S. Richards
Councilmember Councilmember
Ms. Peggy Kelly Ms. Leslie Turner
Councilmember Councilmember
Mr. Fran Hoffman
Director of Public Works & Engineering
Harold Sand
4801 Heritage Preservation Board
Ms. Nina Archabal
State Historic Preservation Officer
Mr. Robert Obermeyer
City Engineer
Mr. and Mrs. B. Christensen
Mr. and Mrs. J. Simons
Mr. and Mrs. A. Navarro
Mr. and Mrs. R. Holetz
Mr. and Mrs. J. Bucklin
Mr. and Mrs. T. Hane
Ms. P. Carrico
Ms. L. Eugster
Ms. L. Sedan
312.34 i - - 153
•iitii
1987 CITY
06 -01 -87
PAGE i
152041
OF EDINA
62.64
CHECK REGISTER
6 CARLSON
'
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N
MESSAGE
3 CARLSON
i
152002
05/26/87
1.52
AT d T
TELEPHONE
10- 4256-510 -51
BURY
-B- CARLSON
2
BALCKTOP - - - -"
152002
05/26/87
22.80
AT d T
TELEPHONE
27- 4256 - 662 -66
& CARLSON
INC
;
10- 4524 - 314 -30
152002
05/26/87
6.31
AT 6 T -
TELEPHONE -- _ --
- 28- 4256- 702 -70
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 314-30
iei
152041 -
----OS/22/87
30.63 s
BURY--
&- CARLSON-
INC - --
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
°
152003
- 05/22/87 - - --
10:30-
-- ALBINSON - - - -- - -" --
GEN SUPPLIES
0= 4504 - 260 =26
391316 - --
- -- -
°
9
a!
10.30 i
^
ssssss
-
- - - -- — - -- -
- - - - - -
-- - - - --
-- - - - - - - --
- --
- sis- CKS ---
',-
152008
05/22/87
30.42
KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY
REPAIR PARTS
27-4540- 664 -66
30.42 i -
- -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - --
-- --
--
- - - - --
�,-
'
ssssss
sss -CKS
152012
05/27/87
25.95
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE C
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
91244
7,
•
25.95 •
i
152013
05/27/87
137.32
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504-646 -64
1313
137.32 •
ssssss
ssi -CKS
=-
152026
-- 05/22/87 " --
— 2,820.84 --
BADGER - METER -INC '- -
WATER METERS
40= 1220 - 000 -00
488201 --
- " --
3:
,,
152026
05/22/87
146.02
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80
488460
3..
2,966.86 i
13-
la7
ssssss
sis -CKS
152031
05/22/87-
- - -- 17.23 " --
BERTELSON BROS INC - - --
GEN SUPPLIES - - - --
-10- 4504 - 133 -12
295009
-
152031
05/27/87
151.28
BERTELSON BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 540 -54
288855
152031
05/19/87
12.16
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516 - 160 -16
294312
152031
05/19/87
- - "" - 5.66 " -"
- - BERTELSON BROS INC -
office suppiLIES- - - - - --
10- 4516-180 -18
294312
4
�-
152031
05/19/87
6.38
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516- 510 -51
294555
152031
05/19/87
86.55
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
10- 4516-510 -51
294312
152031
- _05/27/87 - -
- --- 6.38-------BERTELSON
BROS INC - -
CREDIT- - -
10- 4516-510 -51
-- - - -- -- -
-- - - - --
152031
05/22/87
34.68
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
40- 4516 - 800 -80
B1
'rl
152031
05/22/87
4.78
BERTELSON BROS INC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
40- 4516-800 -80
295762
312.34 i - - 153
•iitii
iii —CKS lye'
152041
05/19/87
62.64
BURY
6 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4504 - 803 -80
150
152041
05/22/87
1,003.44
BURY
3 CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 301 -30
,n
1
152041
05/19/87 --
- - - -- 58.73 -__ -_-
BURY
-B- CARLSON
INC-----
BALCKTOP - - - -"
- 10 -4524= 301 -30 --
- - -,6
152041
05/19/87
13,373.66
BURY
& CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10- 4524 - 314 -30
°7
152041
05/22/87
9,648.50
BURY
& CARLSON
INC
BLACKTOP
10 -4524- 314-30
iei
152041 -
----OS/22/87
-- - 134:24
BURY--
&- CARLSON-
INC - --
BLACKTOP
40- 4524 - 803 -80
_ - -- - -_'�
152047 05/22/87
I
� J; itisii
1
24, 281.21 i 'F''
�°7,
iss -CKS
15r
-- -- - - -- -- - -
30.45 BROWN PHOTO ADVERTISING 23- 4214-611 -61 672896 '•'
7:
74
*00—CKS 7!•
-- - - -- -- — - - -- — - -- - - -7.
1987 1
OF EDINA
CHECK
06 -01 -8'
%GE 2
STER
'
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. R
MESSAGE
'I.
152060
05/26/87
346.50
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
152060
05/26/87
382.47
AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE
CONCESSIONS - _ --
27- 4624- 663 -66
-
,
728.97 *
152061
- 05/22/87
24.54 -
-" A PLUS- PRESORT - --
- POSTAGE "--- - - - - -- -
10- 4290 - 510 -5T—
- --
-- - —
24.54 *
- - --
- - -- - -- - " --
- - - - -
•i* -CKS
,
'
152078
05/26/87
475.77
COCA COLA BOTTLING
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 663 -66
.
- - --
-- - -- - - 475.77- t
-- - -- - - --
--
r
tt +tti
*ii —CKS
1:,
152090
05/27/87
160.34
CERT POWER TRAIN
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
'
160.34 •
'
za
152091
05/22/87
134.42
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10 -4258- 446 -44
'�-
152091
05/22/87
27.76
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10- 4258 - 646 -64
152091
05/22/87
27. 10- `- `-
CITY -OF EDINA-
- WATER
189.28 *
�-
152092
05/19/87- --
- - - - -- 36.88
- C 6 S- DIST "INC -
GEN SUPPLIES- --
10- 4504- 133 -12
- 049539
-
152092
05/19/87
36.89
C d 8 DIST INC
COST OF COMMODITIES
23- 4642-613-61
049539
7
73.77
* + + * *+
*t• -CKS
152099
- 05/22/87- --
- -- 35.99 ---
--CUSHMAN MOTOR CO —
- REPAIR- PARATS-
- 27- 4540 - 664 -66 -26619
-
- --
.
35.99 •
1e1
f,
+ # + * ++
_ - - -- --
- - --. ___ - - - --
- -
it *— CKS __
ia•.
152125
05/27/87
816.00
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 645 -64
16754
f
152125
-05/27/87 - --
33S-00- - --
MERIT SUPPLY - - --
- -" GEN SUPPLIES -
-- 10- 4504- 646 -64
16697 -- -
- - - - - --
t,
152125
05/27/87
184.00
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64
16672
-
152125
05/27/87
2,245.00
MERIT SUPPLY
WEED SPRAY
10- 4566 - 643 -64
16754
152125
05/19/87
305.05 --
MERIT SUPPLY -
CLEANING SUPPLIES- - - -
- -- 23- 4512- 612 -61
16694
--
152125
05/19/87
463.30
MERIT SUPPLY
CHEMICALS
26- 4564- 682 -68
16720
^`
7:•
152125
05/27/87
465.00
MERIT SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 802 -80
16696
-- -
- - - -4; 813.35 *
-- - - -- -- - - -
- --
^a
152126
05/27/87
26.25
DAVIS EUGENE
MILEAGE
10 -4201- 600 -60
G°
152126
- 05/27/87 " - --
-- "210.00 ' - - -
- -- -DAVIS EUGENE " - -- ""
- -- -WEED CONTROL - --
—10 -4208- 600 -60
- - - - --
- -- - "" - --
�:
152126
05/19/87
18.34
DAVIS EUGENE
RUBBER STAMPS
10- 4504 - 600 -60
Ica
^i
254.59 •
Ie31
#ttt #t
* ** -CKS
152128
05/19/87 --
-- - 59.20 -
-- DAIRY HOME -
CONCESSIONS -- - - - - --
- -'28= 4624 - 703 -70
645717
59.20
* *t *ti
- - - - - --
- - --
- - - -- - - - —
- -
*ir- CKS
�17
152130
- _- 05/22/87
_- -81_90
DUNE BUGGY SUPPLY_
_ _- CONT- REPAIRS
28 -4248- 704 -70
U,
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
06-01 -87
PAGE 3 i
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N
MESSAGE
81.90
+
2
*t * * **
- - - --
- - - - --
._...-
- - - - -
- - -- -- - -
-- -- -"- --
- - -
*** -CKS --
a
ie
152132
05/22/87
184.24
PHYSIO CONTROL
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510 - 440 -44
A34306
I,,
*11111
t** -CKS
,z
152143
05/26/87
157.93
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27 -4624- 663 -66
152143
05/26/87
162.62
EMRICH BAKING CO
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624 - 663 -66
,c
152143
05/26/87 --
- "" - -- " 180.21
"- -
EMRICH BAKING CO - -
CONCESSIONS --
- -27= 4624 - 663-66
- --
- --
- ,,
500.76
+
* *t *tt
- -- - -
--
- - -
- -- - - -- —
-- -- - - - -
-
** *- CKS
z,
152146
05/22/87
133.65
GREEN ACRES SPKL
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 643 -64
152146
- - 05/22/87 --
- "- - - - -- 64. 80-
- - --
- GREEN ACRES SPKL
CONT REPAIRS"
1-0=4248- 643- 64
- - - - -- - -
- -- -- - - -
-"
198.45
+
ZI.
t *t * **
-
—
- - - - -- -
- - - -- - - -- - - -
-- - -- ----- - - -
- --
- t ** -CKS
v
152148
05/27/87
81.47
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
SAFETY EQUIP
10- 4642- 301-30
r-•
-" --
- - - - - - --
-- 81 . 47-
q---
- - - - --
- ---
- - - - -- -
— - - - - -..
a
i
*t * * **
* ** —CKS
152158
05/27/87
3,750.00
FEED RITE CONTROL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
26- 4248 - 682 -68
86028
j�^
152158
05/27/87
1,428.44
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER
40 -4622- 805 -80
85739
152158
05/27/87 - -
-- -- 1;728.44 -
- --
FEED RITE- CONTROL - - - - --
CORRECTION - "- -
"40- 4622 - 805 -80
85739 - - - "
- -- -- - - - -
-' ,
152158
05/27/87
1,728.44
FEED RITE CONTROL
WATER
40 -4622- 805 -80
85739
--
'
5,178.44
152159
05/22/87
166.68
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C
REPAIR PARATS
40- 4540 - 810 -80
10830
I+
166.68
+
"
*tt *tt
* ** -CKS
tL
.r
fie,
152188
OS/27/8T --
- ----216-.89
` "_--
_GRAYBAR - ELECTRIC CO ---------REPAIR
PARTS - - - " - -.-
-1 0= 4540 - 520 =52
344671
216.89
*t *t * *- -
-- - --
- - - - -- - --
-- - - -
- -- t** -CKS -
re
-5,
sr
- - - - - --
- — -
°�•• 152194
05/22/87
129.88
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 440 -44
76103
°
152194
- 05/27/87 -
- - - -- 45.00
- -
-- GENERAL COMMUNICATNS - --
RADIO -SERV -- -
-T O= 4294 = 560-56
76798
'
174.88
+
le
ttt *t* -
- - --
- - --
- --
-- -- - -
- -- * **- CKS_�c
yea
152209
05/27/87
13.21
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
644059
-
- - - -
- - -- - -- - 13.21...
* - -
- - - - -- -- - -- -
17'
111111
*** -CKS
._ -• 152214
05/26/87
40.90
TOLL COMPANY
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504- 664 -66
030930
�r
JI
1987
OF EDINA
•-CHECK
STER _ -' - -�
- -- - - -_ - -- - - 06 -01 -8
46E 4
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A
MESSAGE
152214
05/26/87
15.47
TOLL COMPANY
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66 030931
56.37 k
kskkks
kkk -CKS^
152218
- - 05/22/87
- 1,132.00 -
HALLMAN -"
LUBRICANTS----10"4618-560-56
30290 -
-- - -
- n
1,132.00 s
,
- -
-
-
- - - - - --
- -- - -- - - --
kkk -CKS
u
152267
05/19/87
1,109.05
IBM CORPORATION
SERV CONTRACTS
10 -4288- 510 -51
�:-,
1 , 1 09.05 k --
-- - - --
- --
-
- -- - -- - -
- -- - -- - -- - - -- -- - -
- -- - - --
n
kkkkkk
_.
skk -CKS
152278
05/22/87
58.39
JERRYS
FOODS
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
2,
152278
05/19/87
45.85
JERRYS
FOODS
REPAIR PARTS
23- 4540 - 613-61
'
- -- - - - -1 04.24 t -
- - -- - - -
--
-- - -- -
'.
152279
05/19/87
4.85
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 301 -30
21'
152279
05/19/87
- - - "- 11.48
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
" "10- 4504 - 325 -30 - - --
- -- -
152279
05/19/87
10.00
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 390 -30
F
152279
05/19/87
20.20
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 440 -44
152279
-- 05/19/87
-- - 116.20 - -
- - -- JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
- -- GEN SUPPLIES -- "- - -
- - -- 10- 4504 - 440 -44
- - - -'-
152279
05/19/87
20.20-
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
CORRECTION
10- 4504 - 440 -44
152279
05/19/87
43.46
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 470 -47
152279
05/19/87 -
-" -16.07 " --
- JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES -'
-- 10 -4504- 520 -52 - --
152279
05/19/87
6.39
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 540 -54
a;
152279
05/19/87
20.20
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 560-56
152279
-- 05/19/87
- -_ 145.10 - -
- JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
- - GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 646 -64 - -
- - --
- „
152279
05/19/87
9.83
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 660 -66
14:
152279
05/19/87
8.94
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10- 4512- 440 -44
°1
152279
05/19/87
- - 17- 98
-` JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
- - CLEANING SUPPLIES-
10- 4512 - 520 -52'---
- - - -` °` -
,.
152279
05/19/87
138.50
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
°
152279
05/19/87
15.61
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540 -54
152279
- - OS /1 9/87
- -- 21.60 -
-- - JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
- - REPAIR PARTS -" -
--10-4S40-560-S6 -- -- - - --
- - - -- -- -
- -,-
4r
152279
05/19/87
116.58
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 646 -64
152279
05/19/87
33.71
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
PAINT
10- 4544 - 646-64
"`
152279
05/19/87
70.29
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
TOOLS - -
- 10- 4580 - 301 -30 -
s:
33
152279
05/19/87
162.03
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
TOOLS
10- 4580 - 646 -64
152279
05/19/87
45.00
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
LUMBER
10- 4604- 260 -26
ee`
152279
- - -- 05/19/87 -
-- -- 11 .S5 - -
-- JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
LUMBER -
10- 4604- 646- 64--- - - - - --
--- - -
152279
05/19/87
36.34
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
10
y •'
152279
05/19/87
21.89
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
CONT REPAIRS
26- 4248 - 682 -68
t
152279
05/19/87 -
-" -- -24.39 - - - --
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
-- -GEN SUPPLIES -- --
- -2T -4504- 662 -66
Err
152279
05/19/87
43.85
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 664 -66
•I
152279
05/19/87
11.15
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
GEN SUPPLIES
40 -4504- 801 -80
l62
IFS'
152279
-- 05/19/87
----- - - -23. 07 -
- - JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
' -- REPAIR PARTS --
- 40- 4540- 801 -80 -- -- - - -
--' _ -- --
'
152279
05/19/87
24.62
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 802 -80
152279
05/19/87
31.31
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 805 -80
I°7•`
152279
05/19/87 -
- -- -' 12.60
JERRYS
OUR
OWN
HOWE
REPAIR PARTS
50- 4540- 861 -86
1,254.89 k
-
v
i"
kkkk #k
- -----------
- -- - - --
-------- - - -- --
•kk -CKS;
®.
152292
05/27/87
32,018.00
HARRIS
HOMEYER
CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260- 510 -51
14
J01
J1
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
06 -01 -87
PAGE 5
CHECK REGISTER
�I
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. •
MESSAGE
152292
OS/19/87
61,207.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260- 510 -51
z
152292
05/22/87
10,625.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
;
1 03, 850.00
s - - -
- -- - - --
- -- - - -- -
-
-
ssssss
s ** -CKS
152294
05/22/87
564.36
CRESCENT ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 322 -30
564.36
s
ss * *ss
sss -CKS
152301
05/22/87
- " 608.00
--------- KREMER SPRG .-- 6 ALIGN
REPAIR -PARTS -- - --
10- 4540=560 -56
-17688
_
608.00
s
r
1�
- ---
- - - - --
-
sss -CKS
152304
05/27/87
48.32
KNOX LUMBER CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 133 -12
514182
152304
05/26/87 --
-- - - 13.40
- - -- - KNOX- LUMBER CO - -- -"
GEN SUPPLIES-- -
- -28- 4504- 702 -70
S14186--
- - --
_
61.72
s
* ** -CKS
152308
05/27/87
26.00
PARK NIC MED CTR
PHY EXAM
10 -4212- 510 -51
,
- --
- -- - -26 00
s -- - - - - - - -- - -- -
- -- -- - -- -
-- - -
- -
3
sssss
sss -CKS
152315
05/22/87
476.75
ANCHOR PAPER
PAPER SUPPLIES
10 -4514- 520 -52
476.75
s
ss *sss
srs -CKS
i
152317
05/27/87
`- 53.31
"`- LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
-' " -10 -4504- 325 -30
-
!aa
,-
15231T
05/27/87
45.06
LAWSON PRODUCTS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 646 -64
152317
05/27/87
68.49
LAWSON PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
152317 "-
05/27/87 --
— - - - 16.00 "'
- LAWSON PRODUCTS - -
PARTS - - - -'- --10-4620-560-56
- - -
- -
-
14
.;.
182.86
r
51
I
152318
05/19/87
-- - 14.85
------- - -LEEF BROS INC - - --
GEN SUPPLIES - -- -
- -- 83 -4504- 612 -61
14.8S
9.
•sssss
- - - - --
- - - - --
- - - -- - - -- - -
- - -- --
--
*00-CKS --
_
152324
05/19/87
1,951.47
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
10- 4233 - 160-16
152324
05/19/87
1,946.16
LOGIS - - - - -
COMPUTER CHARGES
152324
05/19/87
1,654.33
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
10- 4233 - 420-42
'
152324
05/19/87
1,390.98
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
40 -4233- 800 -80
152324 - -
-- 05/19/87 - -
- - -- 272:94
- LOGIS-- - —
COMPUTER CHARGES --
50- 4233 - 820 -82
_ -- -
-_- - - - -
- -'
152324
05/19/87
272.95
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
50- 4233-840 -84
152324
05/19/87
272.94
LOGIS
COMPUTER CHARGES
50- 4233 - 860 -86
`
- - -7. 761.77
s - - - -- - - -
- - - - - -
-- - - -- -
-
,
b.
152325
05/22/87
891.22
LONG LAKE FORD TRACT
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248- 560 -56
050616
I,
,
- - -
- -- -891 : -22
s - --
sss *ss
r *r -CKS
�I
1987
OF EDINA
CHECK STER
06 -01 -8
4GE 6
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N
MESSAGE
152336
05/26/87
64.25
LANCE
CONCESSIONS
27- 4624- 663 -66
64.25 #
- --
- --
r # # # ##
•rr -CKS
7
152346
05/27/87
217,752.34
MET N WASTE C L COMM
SEWER SERV METER
40- 4312 - 812 -80
4214
'
217,752.34 r
"
152347
05/19/87
992.25
MINNEAPOLIS GUN CLUB
TARGETS
29- 4648 - 722 -72
19868
992.25 •
*so-CKS
152359
05/27/87
28.45 -
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
-- 10- 4540 - 560 -56
654924
-
z.
152359
05/27/87
71.59
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540-560 -56
656399
7
152359
05/27/87
394.25
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
655276
2
152359
- 05/22/87
- ----- -4,S9S.00
MINN TORO INC
CONSTRUCTION
27- 1340 - 000 -00
657621
-
-
152359
05/22/87
270.45
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27 -4540- 664 -66
657213
152359
05/22/87
227.12
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 584 -66
656594
152359
05/22/87
106.97 --
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS --
- 27 =4540- 664 -66
656044
152359
05/22/87
54.63
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
2T- 4540 - 664 -66
656087
152359
05/22/87
20.68
MINN TORO INC
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 664 -66
656418
6,069.14 r - --
- -- - - -- - -
- - --
r # # # ##
- - - -- - -.
•••-CKS
152362
05/19/87
58.40
MODEL STONE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
jo
152362
05/19/87
191.35
MODEL STONE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540-520 -52
152362
-- - - 05/19/87 - --
-- - -- 77.14
MODEL STONE COMPANY - -
REPAIR PARTS -- -
-10- 4540 - 540-54
_ - -
- - -- -
152362
05/19/87
771.40
MODEL STONE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 540-54
42
152362
05/19/87
700.93
MODEL STONE COMPANY
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 540-54
470
152362
- 05/19/87
- "- - 77.14-_____ - --
-MODEL STONE COMPANY --
- CORRECTION - " --
10= 4540 - 540-54
`-
1,722.08 •
rrrrrr
- -- - --
-- — - -- - --
- --
- - -.. —
- - - - - --
-- -- - -
-- -rrr -CKS
152379
05/22/87
30.00
METRO FONE COMM
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504-181 -18
238357
- - 30.00 r - -
-
,e
•rr -CKS
152381
05/19/87
90.56
STAR 6 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10 -4212- 510 -51
^
°
152381
05/26/87
113.20
STAR 6 TRIBUNE
ADVERTISING
10- 4212 - 510 -51
.,
- -- - -203.76 # --------
- - - - -- - - -- -- - -- - - --
- - - - - -- ---- -- -----
- - - - -- -
-- - - - - - -- - -
-- _ - --- ._...__
G
# # # # *•
rrr -CKS
lei
e�!
152383
05/19/87
7,849.00
MPLS COMP TREAS
WATER
40- 4640- 803 -80
Cei
i
7,849.00 •
671
rrr # #r
srr -CKS
�
bj7C
!
152403
-- 05/22/87
- -- -- 288.00
N' W -SOUND -' -- — - -CABLE
TV
10-B148-000-00
59952 -
-
7 r,
—
'
-
288.00 r
- --
- --
-- - - -- - - - -
- - -- -
-
-
- -_
L'
1987 CITY
06 -01 -87
PAGE 7
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0
MESSAGE
-
^j.I • ** ***
* ** -CKS
a
152412
05/22/87
125.93
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
6COST OF COMM
23 -4624- 613-61
135704
152412
05/22/87
5.31-
NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY
CREDIT
23- 4624- 613 -61
135571
-
-- 120.62
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
,z
152443
05/26/87
48.40
POMMER MFG CO
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504 - 702 -70
50040
n
1d.
•
48.40 *
i7
lit
152475
05/22/87
1,093.00
- RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
REPLACEMENT---- -_- _ -_ - -_-
- -10- 4901 - 305 -30
37906
z;
1,093.00 *
z
r: 152492
05/27/87
33.86
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
145778
152492 -
05/27/87
- 284:11 _______SOUTHDALE
FORD _
REPAIR PARTS - -- ---
-_ -10- 4540 - 560 -56
145616
;-
._ 152492
05/27/87
31.83
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
145860
-"
349.80 *
'
137
* * * * **
7i
* ** -CKS
152502
05/27/87 -
_ - -- 21.34 -
— SUBURBAN CHEVROLET -- --REPAIR
PARATS - -
- - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 -72924
-- -
-
21.34 +
'
s
* * * *** --
- - -- -- - - -- - --
-
- - -- -
-- - * **- CKS -
I„
-4:
j' ".
152505
05/19/87
107.10
SUN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
^
. 152505
05/22/87
- - __." -- 360: 17 -"-
-._ -- SUN- -- - - -- - - -
PRINTING "" -- -
- -- -26 =4600- 681-68
152505
05/27/87
43.33
SUN
ADVETISING
50- 4214- 820 -82
^'
' 152505
05/27/87
43.33
SUN
ADVETISING
50- 4214 - 840-84
152505
- 05/27/87- --
- -- "- 43.34 - "
— -" SUN - -- - - - - -" ----ADVETISING---
50 -4214- 860 -86
_
y r
597.27 *
'
51 !
- - -- - - -- _ _
-- - -- - - - - -- -------
--- - - - - -- - - -- -- -
- - - -- __ _. .__---- - -
- - --
-
-... *r* -CKS
7
1 152508
05/19/87
11.16
ST PAUL BOOK
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 133 -12
31813
'*
jR
- - --
-
7r
• * * * **
* ** -CKS
c
152526
05/19/87
21885.95
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10 -4612- 560 -56
45540
G.
152526
05/19/87
2,345.90
TRACY OIL
GASOLINE
10 -4612- 560 -56
45538
6.:
152526- -
05/19/87 " —
- 2;909.95
— TRACY- OIL - - --
GASOLINE— -
10 -461 "2=560 -56-
45540 - - -
-- - - --
8,141.80
R.
inn
* * * * *► -
- - -. -.
- - - - - - - --
- -- - -- -
- - -- - -- -
* ** -CKS
152539
05/22/87
312.50
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
SOD BLACK DIRT
27- 4562- 664-66
19035
I7z
- - --
--
-- -- 312'.50 - - *-
--- - - - - -- - - - - - - -_ - - -
- - -- -- --
----- - - - - --
-- - -
- -- -- -
- -j,:
* ** -CKS
�','
1987
OF EDINA
CHECK STER
06-01 -8
AGE e
CHECK
NO. DATE
_ AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A
MESSAGE
'
152541
05/19/87
8.38
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 133 -12
'
152541
05/19/87
39.96
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
a
152541
05/19/87
56.25
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
n
104.59
*
I7•
....I'
*** -CKS
152553
05/27/87
50.12
- --
- UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS - --
-- - - -10- 4540 - 540 -54
152553
05/27/87
23.30
UNITED ELECTRIC CORP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
I +<
73.42
- - - --
*
- - -- -
-- - - -- -------- -- - - -- - - -
°
*** -CKS
;r
i'
152572
05/26/87
97.85
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES -
- - - -- 10 -4514- 520 -52
51255
152572
05/26/87
273.90
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
51194
371.75
*
Z
******
* ** -CKS -
-n:
152575-
05/27/87
- - -- - - -- 67:00
WATER PRODUCTS -- --
REPAIR PARTS - -
- - -- - -40- 4540 - 803 -80
036605
-" -- --
• r
"
152575
05/22/87
595.00
WATER PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTAS
40- 4540- 803 -80
036914
='
662.00
*
'31
r
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
3'
7 "•
152579
05/27/87 .. --
71.57-
-
WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE
TOOLS -- - -
- - - -40- 4580 - 801 -80
78290
- "-
71.57
3• °
- - -- - - - --
- - --
- --
- - - --
-
-- ** *- CKS_.
— •,
—
152582
05/22/87
304.70
GORDON SMITH CO
GASOLINE
27- 4612- 664 -66
1063
a`
L,•
-
- -- -- - -- 304:70
* -- - -
-- - - - - - --
- - - - - - -- - --
- -- -- — -- -
- --
-
'
152583
05/22/87
212.13
WALDOR PUMP 6 EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
89741
a'�
*** -CKS
152586
05/27/87
92.19
W W GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
15•
•� '
* * * * **
* ** -CKS
-
152593
- -- 05/19/87 --
-- --- "`-' -" -- 108: 05
- - - --
MINNESOTA CLAY - -- -
CRAFT SUPPLIES - ---
- - -23= 4588= fi11 =6i
02355 - - --
- -- - -- - _
Icrl
IE,'
108.05
•
ez
152594
- 05/19/87
- 3,488. -33 -
--
STORE - FRONT------ - - - -'—
SERVICES - -. -
-i0 -4201= 504 " =50
--
--
3,488.33
66
s
* ** -CKS
- ,.,
152603
05/26/87
335.00
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
"°
335.00
- *—
- -- - -- - - -- -- - -
--
--
-
__
*** -CKS
I
"g°
....- -- - -
--
1987 CITY OF EDINA
CHECK NO. DATE
AMOUNT
CHECK REGISTER
VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
06 -01 -87 PAGE 9
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE
152613
05/22/87
77.79
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
10- 4620- 560 -56
52795
1
152613
05/22/87
776.95
MCNEILUS STEEL
PARTS
- 10- 4620- S60 -56
52568
,
_
854.74 w
,
152703
05/19/87
134.96
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
10- 4250 - 301 -30
152703
05/19/87
42.43
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL -
- - - - -- 10- 4250 - 440 -44
--
152703
r�
05/19/87
66.10
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
10- 4250-520-52
152703
05/19/87
134.96
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
10- 4250 - 540 -54
152703
05/19/87 ""
10.60
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL - - -
-- 10- 4250- 630 -62
- --
152703
05/19/87
107.62
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
10- 4250 - 645 -64
152703
05/19/87
62.23
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
10- 4250- 645 -64
152703
05/19/87
- 7.35 - --
WASTE MANAGEMENT -
REFUSE COLL - - - --
-- 23- 4250 - 612-61
--
152703
05/19/87
212.58
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
27- 4250- 662 -66
152703
05/19/87
42.43
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
27- 4250- 664 -66
152703
05/19/87 - - -
- -- 127.40 - - --
WASTE MANAGEMENT - --
- REFUSE COLL - - - -_
-28- 4250 - 702 -70
- -- - -"
- - -- '
152703
05/19/87
225.40
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
50- 4250 - 841-84
152703
05/19/87
225.40
WASTE MANAGEMENT
REFUSE COLL
50- 4250 - 861 -86
-1,399.46
r 152704
05/19/87
1,700.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 264 -04
- -1,70 0.00 y - -
- -- - - - -- -- - - -
- - - - -- - - -
- - -- - -
- -
- - - -
152705
05/19/87
23.26
TARGET
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 140 -14
-
-23.26
' 152706
05/19/87
1,095.00
BMS /OFFICE STORES
SER CONT
10- 4288 - 510-51
1930
'
--
- - - --1 , 095.00 w- - -
- - -- -- -- - - -- -- - - -
- -- ------ - - - - -- -----
-- - - -- - - - - - -- -- -
-- - -- --
y
r 152707
05/19/87
450.00
CLASSIC DRYWALL
CONST
27- 1320 - 000 -00
1982
'
- --
450.00 w- - --
__ -- - - - - - -- - - --
r 152708
05/19/87
135.00
PHILLIP DOMMER
TUITION
10- 4202 - 120 -12
I°
- 135.00 # -
- - -- - -- - --
J 152709
05/19/87
150.00
AMERICAN FORESTRY
HIS SEEDLINGS
10- 4560- 644 -64
41
- - -
- -
152710
05/19/87
4,951.50
DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER
CAP OUTLAY
25- 4900 - 001 -68
..
- 152710 - "
- -- 05/19/87-
- -- 260:00------
DOWELL SCHLUMBERGER- ---CONT-
REPA IRS-
26- 4248 - 682 -68
- - --
5,211.50 w
152711
- 05/19/87 - '-----
- - -30. 00
RAYMOND 3 HAEG - --
- REFUND - - - -- - f`" - "
- - "- 10 -311-0- 000 -00
-- --
pr
u
152711
05/19/87
3.60
RAYMOND E HAEG
REFUND
10- 3357- 000 -00
M_
152711
05/19/87
60.00
RAYMOND 6 HAEG
REFUND
40- 3530 - 000 -00
iR
- -
- - -- - - -- -- -
-- - - -9 3 : 60 -# -
-- - -- - - - - - - -- --
--
- -- --
- - --
152712
05/19/87
140.00
INTERNATIONAL
DUES
10- 4204- 490 -49
0
- -
- - -- 140. 00 # - --
- -- - - -
- - -- - --
- - -- - - - - -- -
- -
�•
152713
05/19/87
80.00
TWIGS
CONFERENCE
10 -4202- 600 -60
101
he
j;;
-
- - -
- 8 0 -.00 -y
-- - -- --
-- - - -- -- -
- - -- -- -
- -
I
- ,
` 152714
05/19/87
102.95
NORTHWESTERN COSTUME
GEN SUPPLIES
28- 4504- 702 -70
M1833
74
JI
r
r
r
1987 OF EDINA CHECK STER
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION
102.95 +
06 -01 -8 4GE 10
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE
152715 05/19/87 60.75 JOYCE REPYA LICENSE PLATES - - -10- 4310- 560 -56
60.75 +
152716 05/19/87 - 132.30 MACH CHEMICALS -` REPAIR- PARTS -- 40=4540= 803-80_146909
132.30 +
152717 05/19/87 - - 458.38 - -- JOHNSON BIGLER CO - CONCRETE "y
458.38 +
152718 05/19/87 - 570.53 - RAINBOW LEASING CO CONT SERV- - - -
570.53 +
40= 4528 - 803 -80 28189 -
10- 4200 - 507 -50 152718
152719
05/19/87
850.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR - -
-- 10- 4216= 160-16
152719
05/19/87
100.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
23- 4216- 611 -61
152719
05/19/87
150.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
26- 4216 - 681 -68
152719 --
05/19/87 _ -
- - -- 500.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
- AUDITOR----------
- -27- 4216 - 661 -66 -
152719
05/19/87
500.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
28- 4216 - 701 -70
152719
05/19/87
100.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
29- 4216 - 721 -72
152719
05/19/87 -
3,000.00 -"
- PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
152719
05/19/87
1,500.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
50- 4216 - 620 -82
152719
05/19/87
1,500.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
50- 4216 - 840 -84
152719 -
05/19/87 - -
- - 1,500.00_.
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN -
-- AUDITOR- - --
50-4216- 860 -86 - -- --
152719
05/19/87
300.00
PEAT
MARWICK
MAIN
AUDITOR
66- 2490 - 000 -00
10,000.00 +
152720
05/19/87
472.29
HOLDEN BUSINESS
PRINTING
26- 4600- 681 -68 181559
472.29 +
152721
05/19/87
66.15
BILL
BACH
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
66.15 +
? 152722
05/27/87
164.90
PIP
PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
152722
05/19/87
36.70
PIP
PRINTING
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504-133-12
152722-
05/19/87 -
-- - -19.95 - -
-- PIP-
PRINTING
- - -- -
-- GEN SUPPLIES -
- -1 -0- 4504=133 -12
4
n
a
114
f�
�3'
4:
I+ �
°a
,°o,
1. �I
�c4
�,r•j
X67•
h�
,�
7 �
221.55
+
152723
05/19/87
19.77
MCGRAW HILL BOOK.CO
GEN SUPPLIES "" --
-- -10- 4504- 133 -12 -
19.77
+
,
a
IS2724
_ - -05/19/87 --
- _ -- 212.47 --
- - -- XEROX - - -
SER CONTRACTS
Y
212.47
+
152725
05/19/87- -
- -- -- 749.51
- - -" IBM CORP - - -- - - --
EQUIP - RENAL-
749.51
+
152 ?26 -----
-_ -- 05/19/87 - "-
936.50
-- - - - -- BAILEY- NURSERIES INC- - - -
- -- TREES - - - - - --
10- 4560 = 353 -30 --
r
936.50
+
152727
05/22/87
68.72 -
-- MARCELLA DAEHN
MILEAGE d PARK
'
68.72
+
152728
-- 05/22/87 - -
- -- - - 56.92-
- - - -- CENTRAIRE -INC - - -- - - - - -
-- CONT REPAIRS
- -29- 4248 - 722 -72 - 18481 -- --
56.92
+
4
n
a
114
f�
�3'
4:
I+ �
°a
,°o,
1. �I
�c4
�,r•j
X67•
h�
,�
7 �
/ 1987 CITY or soIww
-|
, c*scn wn� o*�s *nouwr
' -' --- ----------------'--''
/
'
it
�
cxsCw nsGzoTsm oa-nv-or pAws 11
vsmoon zrsm nsocmzprzom ����umr NO. INV. # P.O. 0 nsoaAms
�
�
15e729
os/aa/or
�o�.nV
vw��sr n�ossm p�zmr
pnzmTzmm
vn-waon-uwo-aw
^
'
�we�*w
*
-
- '- --
- -- --
"
15e730
05/22/87
160.00
nz���* *mu�
comr mE�zmm
wn-��-onv�n
'.
,
-�
-'----,an.nn
* ---
--' ----' - '—
- -- -- ----�--'--------'----'------
-- - - -
------~
15e731
ms/22/87
150.00
mur* Jnwmsom
p�Amrxwe
1n-*snw-m*�-aw
'
-' --
- '-' -van-ww
* --
- - - - '
'--�-------�---------'---'--
15273e
os�ee/a7
20.00
Lzmo* cuLLsm
Gsm muppLzso
vn-w5n*-vo3-ve
�mss
- --- - ''
------an.nn
* —
----- -- - -'
- � ---'-------'-----------'--------
-
..'
vsarss
ns/22/87
sw��r
nsmw�m ww�wem
mz�s*ws
e7-4eoo-6a1-am
sm.17- ----
* --
-
-��- ----
---- ------
,.
Is2734
os/oz/wr
11.60
sLwnw pwnrosmwpwr
*ov
11-61
asno1n
-- -------��---�-�rmn
�
*-'------'--------
-
-'----------------
-'--'
- � '-
-'------ '�
vsarss
05/e2/87
vn�.��
smwsnwm o-wm*ouws
c�mc u �orrss
10-4504-100-10_______
- - -
103.39
*---'
- - -
- --- - '--- --------
--- - -
---- - i"
-
Ise736
os/ea/wr
21518.00
Lswmus or nm CITIES
ousw
10-4204-140-14
-
-' -- '-
e^518.00
p-------'-----
'- -- —'---'
-'---
--___---____-
_-___ �_____�___`,
vs2737
ns�aa�m�
ee8.e4
BRADY orrz�su�ns
��m�s ry
-
xn-e,4y-nnnnn
p.
�
- -
- --'aee.e���---------
- -
- ---�� ------'-------
-
"-
152738
ns/ns�r
v3s.�
���nm S�sm
n�*zn p�ro
o��4n-aaa�a
nn��
|�
-
-- -' - --
�e.no
*----'-
----------
------�--'---
- - - ----
-------� �^�
Isa739
ws/ee�wr
49S.00
sam BmOr*sem m mnw�
pzps
*0-45sw-801-80
2�76
.�
- -
---
--'-4ys.nn*---
' --'-----'-- ---
--'----- ---'-'-
--------------'-
--
- — .�
15e740
05^e2/87
sw.vs
CwoorLAw wrmrsn
Gsw muppLzsm
10-4sn4-133-12
162326
|~/
--- --
- -- su� vs*------
- -- --' '
--- - -----�--
----'' -
- --' �.`
vs27*1
os/ee/mr
`v.*m
mnwo msocus
Imr *zo ouppLr
vu-4mvn-*4n-w4
152741
os/ee/87 ----
-----e.3s-----
oowo Rsacus - -
- 1ST AzoouppLr -----'----
0-4510-440-44
15419
13.81
15e7+2
-ns/zz/e7 ------'-a'ea7.wn------
JOE -mmsupmsn
Lsonomm-
1 0 0 -6 61 -au----'-'---
------�..
6,867.00
*
��
15er43
- os/ee/wv '----------
rs.mo
- -----nAmcrws
sonAm'- '-
- wsRvzoso-
7s.nm
*
15e7*4
420. 00
----*-L-moons'
DRUG -- -------,mr-wzn-SuppLzsS--------n~*510~4*0^4*-------
-----'
- ----'-.
420.00
*
."
vs274s
ws/ee/er
- - 80.00
- --
rzns'Imor wnSw
moona ----
---10-4sno-+*0-44
aysa '
!'
80 .00
�
*
+.
'
15e7*6
- 05/e7/87 ''-------oa'nw
-------ozAmmvn
vossL pwzmT -
osm SUPPLIES ----------vn-*sw4-3n1-3w'--�----
�
15e746
05/e7/87
16.65
ozwnomn vOosL pAzwr
7
asm SUPPLIES
� - wsn*-3m1 - 3n
n
�I
I
1987
OF EDINA
CHECK
STER
06-01 -8 4GE 12
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE
152746
05/22/87
51255.50
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT
PAID
10 -4544- 335 -30
111948
5,308.15
t
'
152747
05/22/87
13,267.00
POLAR CHEV 3 MAZDA
REPLACEMENT
10 -4901- 650 -64
q
152747
05/22/87
10,897.00
POLAR CHEV 6 MAZDA
REPLACEMNT
10- 4901- 800 -80
152747
- 05/22/87 --
12,867.00
POLAR CHEV d MAZDA
REPLACEMENT
TO =4901= 800 -80
-
37,031.00
+
152748
05/22/87
-- 458.00
- - --
BAILEY NURSURIES -
- TREES _ -- - - - -10-
4560 = 644 -64
- "-
458.00
152749
05/22/87 --
- 3,136.73
'MILLER DUNWIDDLE 3
CONSTRUCTION--
60 -1300- 007 -20
75983
152749
05/22/87
353.07
MILLER DUNWIDDLE b
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 007 -20
75972
3,489.80
+
152750
05/22/87
202.75
JAMES PHILLIPS CO
1ST AID SUPPLY
10- 4510- 440 -44
-
202.75
- - --
t
152751
05/26/87
478.75
GREEN TOUCH
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248-643 -64
12527
I
478.75
152752
05/26/87
100,000.00
MARQUETTE BANK MPLS
TRUST ACCT 50 8156
10- 1090 - 000 -00
x
100,000.00
+
111111
+tt -CKS
3.
yl
3•
152754
- 05/26/87
-- 264.00
-- -
BILL DIETRICHSON
INST ART CTR- - "-
-- 23- 4201 - 611 -61
--
264.00
152755
05/26/87 --
- 384.00
JEAN -GRAPP - --
- INST ART CTR - ----23-4201"61-1-61
- - - - -- - - - - --
- -',;
384.00
+
-,
152756
- 05/26/87 -
-- 132. -00
'- _- -
- HARRY HEIM -" - --
- "INST ART- CTR -. - --
E3- 4201 - 611 -61 -
- - - --
132.00
t
I«
a
152757
- -- 05/26/87 --
618.00-
- - - - --
- MARIAN- ALSTAD - --
- INST ART -CTR-
--23-4201-611-61
"r
618.00
t
fie,
152758
05/26/87
- 785.00
-
- -KAY SCHLOSSER
INST ART CTR - - -
23-4201-611-61-
-
785.00
t
152759
05/26/87
- 276:00
--
MONICA- RUDOUIST- --
- - INST - ART- CTR --
23 -4201- 611- 61. -_
- -_- - -- - - - -
,-
276.00
t
ec
152760
05/26/87-
- -- 224:00
- -'
DOROTHY`ODLAND- -
-` " INST- ART CTR
224.00
+
152761-
-- - 05/26%87 - --
120. -00
- -
-BETSY BRYANT- --
2NST- ART - CTR --
23= 4201 = 611 =61 -
- - --
r,
-
120.00
152762
05/26/87
144.00
- -
CY- TURNBLADH
INST ART CTR -- --
-23-4201-611-61
C.
r
144.00
+
152763
OS/26/87---
-- 132.00
BILL COLE - -- -
- -- -INST ART CTR - --
_ 23- 4201- 611 -61 _
- -- -
,
132.00
+
7e
r'
�y
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -01 -87 PAGE 13
�)
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
M P.O. N MESSAGE
z
152764
05/26/87
117.00
RAY GORMLEY
INST ART
CTR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
117.00
•
-
J
152765
05/26/87
533.00
KATHY GUSTAFSON
INST ART
CTR
23- 4201-611 -61
s
- - - 533.00
•
-- - - - -' - - - - --
0
-.I
152766
05/26/87
60.00
BERNADETTE DALY
INST ART
CTR
23- 4201- 611 -61
i!;r
J'•
14
152767
05/26/87
86.00
EVIE HOLMQUIST
INST ART
CTR
23 -4201- 611 -61
86.00
•
152768
05/26/87
132.00
MARGARET GUST
INST ART
CTR
23- 4201 - 611-61
�Z`
132.00
r
- --
- - -- --
-
Z
152769
05/26/87
480.00
SUSAN FRAME
INST ART
CTR
23- 4201 - 611 -61
152769
- 05/26/87
200.20
-- SUSAN "FRAME
REIM SUPPLIES
- 23- 4624- 613 -61 -
- "- - - -- -" - --
680.20
•
152770
05/26/87
- -- - -- 360.00
-
J- THOMAS NELSON - -
INST ART
CTR -- - -.--
23- 4201 -= 611 -61 --
-
-"
360.00
•
152771
- 05/26/87 --
-- - -- 145.00 -
- - -
QUALITY- REFRIDG " -INC "- --
SERVICES-
-27 -4201= 663-66 -
- - -- - - - - -"
-�,
145.00
r
:_
3'
152773
05/26/87
80.00
MAAO
DUES
10- 4202 - 200-20
- -
-- - - - - -- -
- - -- -80.00
• --
- - -- -- - - - -- - -
- --
-
--
`
s,
+rr * *r
• ++ -CKS
I °,
152775
05/27/87
230.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 506-50
4f
y
230.00
r
* * * * **
+•+-CKS
31'
152777
05/27/87
12.60
ALVIN WOODS
SERVICES
--
10= 4236 -184 -18 -
12.60
r
152778
- -- 05/27/87
- - - - - "- 4.62
- CHET - ORNAT - -
MILEAGE ________-----10-4208=184-18
-
- - -
3
- "5
152778
05/27/87
12.60
CHET ORNAT
SERVICES
10- 4236- 184 -18
17.22
•
49' oc
152779
05/27/87
5.04
JOHN FECHO
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 184 -18
'!
152779
05/27/87
12.60
JOHN FECHO
SERVICES
10 -4236- 184 -18
�<
- - - -- - -
- -- -- - - --- -
- - -- 17:64
-r
- - - --- -- - - - - --
- -
-
' - -- --
- 'E •
152780
05/27/87
1.47
HAROLD HABIGHORST
SERVICES
10- 4208 - 184 -18
Gf
67
152780
05/27/87
12.60
-
- -- HAROLD HABIGHORST•
SERVICES
- -
10 -423b- 184 -18 -
14.07
•
„�
7
152781
- 05/27/87- "-
- - - 6.93-
- " - -
-- RICHARD HERKAL "- --
SERVICES
--
-10- 4208 = 184- 18- - -
- - -" - - -- "- "-- - - - - --
�,
152781
05/27/87
240.98
RICHARD HERKAL
SERVICES
10- 4236 - 184 -18
174
L•
1987
OF EDINA
CHECK
'STER
06 -01 -e AGE 14
CHEC..
DATE
- AMOUNT
_ - VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
- -- - -- - -- -- -
A P.O. 0 MESSAGE
- --
247. 91
- - --
-
152782
05/27/87
2.31
GLENN HARMON
SERVICES
-10- 4208- 184 -18
}
;
�.
152782
05/27/87
12.60
GLENN HARMON
SERVICES
10- 4236- 184-18
14.91 t
152783
05/27/87
.42
ROLAND LUNDBERG
SERVICES
10- 4208 - 184 -18
152783
05/27/87
12.60
-
ROLAND LUNDBERG
SERVICES
10- 4236- 184 -18
13.02 r -
- --
'
152784
05/27/87
-
9.45
ERNEST BUFFINGTON
SERVICES
10- 4236 - 184 -18
- 9.45 r --
-- -- -
- - - -
--
'
152785
05/27/87
102.00
BILL OLSON
CONSTRUCTION
60- 1300 - 182 -03
i.
'
102.00
- --
'"
ttttat
'
-- - - -
- - - -
- - -
ttr -CKS
'
152787
05/27/87
488.00
LIGHTING PLASTIC MN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 322 -30
7233
488.00 r
152788
05/27/87
278.29
LAKELAND FORD TRUCK
CONT REPAIRS
10- 4248 - 560 -56
27635
278.29 r
'
152789
05/27/87
20.00-
ASHLAND CHEM CO
CREDIT
10- 4504- 335 -30
152789
05/27/87
-
130.35
-
ASHLAND CHEM CO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 335 -30
110.3S- - -
-
__
i-
152790
05/27/87
- --
370.00
E H RENNER
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540- 801 -80
9322
-
- -- 370.00 r - --
- -- - - -- - --
152791
05/27/87
13.54
CONT SAFETY EQUIP
SAFETY EQUIP
10- 4642- 301 -30
11631
152791
05/27/87 --
- -' -- 160.27 - - "` --
-CONY SAFETY EQUIP - --
- - - SAFETY EQUIP -------40-4642-801-80
- 111632 -- - - -- - -
"
173.81 r
'
152792
- 05/27/87 --
- -- ---- -27.05 - - - - - --
ED MCDEVITT CO - - - --
REPAIR PARTS----
- - -10- 4540 - 560-56
61831 - --- -- - - --
27.05 r
152793
05/27/87
25.00 -
BECKY L BEATT
REFUND -
- - -40- 3525 - 000 -00
25.00 r
''
152794
-- 05/27/87
- 2, 990. 00- - - - --SW
SUB" -CABLE COMM -
- CABLE -TV - - - -- --
- 1 0- 2148= 000 -00
_ -- -- - - --
'�
2,990.00 r
152795
05/27/87 - --
- ----- 147.90 -"
WAYNE HOUSE -- --
REIMBURSEMENT - --
10- 4202 - 280 -28
es.
147.90
152796-
-- 05/27/87_.-
T -- 166.26 - - - --
MN CELLULR - TELEPHONE
-- - DUES - ---
- - -10- 4204= 140-14
- -- - - --
�`
166.26 r
152797
05/27/87
- 127.65 -
- HOPKINS PLBG 6 HTG
CONSOTRUCTION
-60- 1300 - 182 -03
24428
w.
127.65 r
152798
-- 05/27/87- -
- - - - -- __ - -_
-MILAN- GOOD -ROADS - - -
- SERVICES---- -
- --10 =4201- 260 -26
- -- - - ---- - -
-� -,'
•
155.00_+
I14
I'
1987 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
06 -01 -87
PAGE 15
�(
i
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N
MESSAGE
'I
�
152799
05/27/87
2,929.11
FRED G ANDERSON
REMODELING
10 -2148- 000 -00
z
'
a
152799
05/27/87
459.68
FRED G ANDERSON
REMODELING - - -
10- 4544 - 520 -52
-"
152799
05/27/87
2,044.90
FRED G ANDERSON
REMODELING
2S- 4946 - 520-52
°
5,433.69 s
IR
152800
05/27/87
73.24
RUDOLPH RANSEEN
AMBULANCE REFUND
10- 3180 - 000 -00
�.
73.24 s
152801
05/27/87
504.00
ERIC ANDERSON
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 500-50
152801
05/27/87
42.00
ERIC ANDERSON
MILEAGE
10- 4208- 500-50
- -
',
152802
05/27/87
4,800.00
C 0 REIN GALLERIES
WATERCOLOR PAINTING
10 -4504- 133 -12
;
- -
- 4,800.00
152803
05/27/87
200.00
DAVID BATES
PROF SERVICES
10- 4504 - 133 -12
,.
- _
200.00 + --
- - - - -- --
152804
05/27/87
1,000.00
DOUGH LEW
SKETCHES
10- 4504- 133 -12
1,000.00 i --
-- _ - -..- -
152805
05/27/87
350.00
MIKE RAWLINGS
PHOTO SERVICES
10- 4504- 133-12
'
- - -
- -- ----- - -
- - -- 350:00 -; - -
- - -- -- - -- - - - -- - - --
-- - - - - -- -- -- -
- - - --
-- --
- --- - - - - --
.,
152806
05/27/87
150.00
DICK HAYS
PHOTO SERVICES
10- 4504-133-12
ssssss
sss -CKS
154332
05/22/87
5.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
DUES
10 -4204- 140 -14
5465
5.00 •
,1
ssssss
sss -CKS
�r
157786
05/27/87 -
- 175.00 " --
"" DUANE NIELSEN -
'REPAIR PARTS - - " - - "-
40 =4540- 801-80
1082
a
175.00 s
ssssss
- - -
-- - - - - - - - -.-
- -- _.- -
- - - -- ---
- - - - - --
-
sss -CKS -
,-
331,294.14
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
5,922.64
FUND 23 TOTAL
ART CENTER
Computer Checks
dl's
5
-
- -- - -- - -"
- - -- 6, 996:40 - - "-
- -- -FUND 25 -TOTAL ---- " - - - "- - - --
CAPITAL FUND - - —
78323 thru 78501
5,477.65
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
'{
"i
16,992.83
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
-
- - - -- - - -
- - -- -- 939.S6
- - -- FUND 28 TOTAL " - - "— -
RECREATION CENTER - FUND -
- - -- - - -- -- "
e
1,149.17
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
APPROVED FOR PAYMENT
238,288.10
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
-- - --
- - - -" -----S,
912.23"
—FUND "50- -TOTAL - - -- -
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
CHECK REGISTER DATED ol, ;
-
5,419.45
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
300.00
FUND 66 TOTAL
IMP BOND REDEMPTION 02
PAGES
/
-_
r
THROUGH
/i•
y.
618, 692 . 17 ,
TOTAL
- --
7i
�.
UlW—MANAgER
DATE
—
y ...
[71
r.
FINANCE DIKERUW—WffiE�-