Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-06-15_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 15, 1987 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF -HRA MINUTES OF JUNE 1, 1987 II. AMENDMENTS TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN - Hedberg Property ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION - Edina High School Boys' Tennis Team Edina High School Boys' Golf Team I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick () and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items:unless a Council -, Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Special Meetings of May 11 and 12 and the Regular Meeting of June 1, 1987 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote to majority of quorum required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Final Development Plan - Construction of a new medical office building - Fairview Southdale Hospital - 6401 France Av (Contd from 5/18/87) B. Final Development Plan - Construction of a new office building - Regis Corporation - 5000 Normandale Rd (Contd from 5/18/87) C. Final Development Plan - Building expansion - Cineplex Odeon Corporation - (Edina Theatre) - 3911 W. 50th Street (Continue to 7/6/87) D. Conditional Use Permit - Building expansion - Normandale Lutheran Church - 6100 Normandale Rd IV. PUBLIC HEARING ON STREET VACATION. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Vacation of Arcadia Avenue V. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of quorum required to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. A. First Reading (Waive Second Reading) 1. Ordinance No. 1222 -A3 - To Define and Regulate Use of Programmed Parks Agenda Edina City Council - June 15, 1987 Page Two VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Sue Hoigaard - Edinborough Park Rentals /Liquor VII. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Removal of Boulevard Trees * B. (2) Snow Plow Wings C. Insurance Renewals VIII. . RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Arneson Acres Park Master Plan B. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of June 9, 1987 C. Smoking Policies - Park and City Facilities D. Wine License Renewals E. Fire Department Reorganization Plan F. 1987 -88 Work Program G. Update on Swensons' Ice Cream Restaurant H. Summary of 1987 Legislative Acts IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS A. Darrel D. Stark - Request for Watermain Connection Charge to be Assessed X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE *- A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 6/15/86: General Fund $243,625.12, Art Center $3,574.00, Capital Fund $17,031.34, Swimming Pool Fund $545.92, Golf Course Fund $22,814.99, Recreation Center Fund $2,850.45, Edinborough Park $650.00, Utility Fund $42,489.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund $85,907.14, Construction Fund $83,636.05, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $150,275.00, Total $653,399.22; and for Confirmation of Payment of the following Claims dated 5/31/87: General Fund $639,979.60, Art Center $374.96, Swimming Pool Fund $149.94, Golf Course Fund $8,721.63, Recreation Center Fund $425.97, Gun Range Fund $113.21, Utility Fund $1,730.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $542,680.91, Construction Fund $53,833.88, Total $1,248,011.05 Mon July 6 Regular Council Meeting Mon July 20 Regular Council Meeting Mon Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting Mon Aug 17 Regular Council Meeting SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JUNE 1, 1987 Answering rollcall were Commissioners, Kelly, .Smith, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the HRA meeting of May.18, 1987 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AMENDMENT TO JERRY'S ENTERPRISES AGREEMENT APPROVED. Attorney Erickson recalled that the HRA and Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment as of February 1, 1987 and that the City, the HRA and Jerry's entered into an Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement as of the same date. He explained that an amendment is requested by Jerry's lendor to clarify the intention of the parties that the parking ramp cost be paid.by special assess- ment rather than by some other means. In the amendment Jerry's waives its rights to notice of, all rights to a public hearing relating to, and all rights to appeal from or object to any such special assessments levied by the City. The amendment is acceptable to the lendor and meets with the City's initial intent and approval is recommended. Commissioner Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority that it hereby approves the.amendment to Contract for Private Redevelopment and Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement as presented and hereby authorizes and directs the execution thereof by officials of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the meeting was adjourned by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Motion carried. Executive Director 1987 AMENDMENTS„ TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN of- THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 1t• Table of Contents I Introduction A. Recitals and Statement of Authority B. Definitions C. Statement of Need D. Statement of Objectives II. 1987 Project A. Description of 1987 Project 1. 1987 Project Area 2. Conditions of Blight 3. Redevelopment Activities B. Development of 1987 Project Area 1. Use 2. Redevelopment Agreements C. Relocation III. Financing of Public Redevelopment Cost.of 1987 Project IV. Implementation of 1987 Project and Plan A. In General B. Cooperation Agreement V. Additional Amendments to Plan VI. Original Plan VII. Exhibits Exhibit A - Legal description of tax parcels, or portions thereof included in 1987 Project Area I. INTRODUCTION A. Recitals and Statement of Authority. The Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council have previously approved the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, which established a tax increment financi-ng-di-strict. as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section.273.73, subdivision 9. It has been proposed that the 1987 Project Area, as hereinafter defined, be developed as a mixed use development containing owner occupied and rental residential units, retail facilities., office buildings and public and private amenities. This 1987 Amendment supplements and amenus the Southeast -Edina Redevelopment Plan to provide for the redevelopment of the 1987 Project Area. This 1987 Amendment.does not enlarge the tax increment financing district established by the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. This 1987 Amendment is established by action of the Commissioners of the HRA and the City Council of the City, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462, and this 1987 Amendment.is approved by such bodies pursua :it to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462.' B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of this First Amendment, have the meanings given to them in this Section: "Bonds" means the bonds or obligations, now or hereafter issued by the City or the HRA (which may be in one or more- issues) to finance -the acquisition of the 1987 Project Area (and related costs), to finance the construction of the .Public Improvements and related costs, to finance construction of the Park, to pay other public redevelopment costs to be paid by the HRA with respect.to the 1987 Project. The term "Bonds" shall also include any bonds or obligations issued to refund any Tax Increment Bonds. "Capital Proceeds of the 1987 Project" means all amounts received or to be received by the.City or the HRA from the sale or lease of property in the 1987 Project Area. "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Developer" means any person acquiring any portion of the 1987 Project Area from the HRA or any other person constructing any of the Private Improvements. "District" means the tax increment financing district established by the Plan. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina. "Original Plan" means the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan, as hereto amended and supplemented by.the HRA and the City Council pursuant to law. "Park" means any public park to be constructed by the HRA or the City in the 1987 Project Area, including all landscaping, recreational facilities and equipment, and other amenities therein or related thereto. "Plan ". -means the Original Plan as su amended by this i987 Amendment and as further amended from time to time by the HRA and City "Private Improvements" means the the be,constructed on the 1987 Project Area which by other than the HRA or City. oplemented and supplemented and Council. improvements to are to be owned "Public Improvements" means streets, roads, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, storm water holding pond, public parking, public transportation facilities and public utilities to be constructed and installed by the City or the HRA on or adjacent to the 1987 Project Area. "Public Redevelopment Cost" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City and /or the HRA on Redevelopment Activities, less the Capital Proceeds of the 1987 Project. "Redevelopment Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken: (1) by the HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the 1987 Project, including but not limited to the acquisition of the 1987 Project Area, the acquisition and construction of the Public Improvements to be constructed by the HRA, and the acquisition and construction of the Park; (2) by the City in aid of the 1987 Project pursuant to the Plan, including, but not limited to the acquisition and construction of the Public Improvements to be constructed by the City; and (3) by Developers in constructing the Private Improvements. "Redevelopment Agreement" means any and all agreements between the HRA or the City, or both and a Developer with respect to the 1987 Project. "1987 Project" means all of the Private Improvements, the Park and all of the Public Improvements constructed or to be constructed upon or adjacent to the 1987 Project Area, and includes the 1987 Project Area. "1987 Project Area" means the entire parcel of land upon which the 1987 Project is or is to be constructed, as more =2- fully described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. C. Statement of Need. There exists in the City a shor -tage of decent,.safe, sanitary and affordable housing for the elder=ly and persons of Tow and moderate--income a-nd the HRA, as in the past, is desirous of promoting the development of housing for the elderly and other persons in the City. There, is a need for redevelopment of the 1987 Project Area which will result in the increase of the value of property.subject to taxation by the City and other local government units, and the increase of.general economic activity in the City, all of which will improve living standards, promote desirable development of 1987 Project Area in an orderly fashion and at a cost reasonably related to the public purpose to be served without residential clearance and with full consideration of the preservation of beneficial aspects of the urban and natural environment for a use consistent with emphasis on housing for the elderly and persons of low and moderate income, prevent the emergence of blighted property and areas, relieve congestion and volume of traffic in the 1987 Project Area arid, on adjacent streets, add to the cultural facilities available to the public in the City, and encourage and enhance the general health and welfare of the residents of the City. The actions herein proposed to be taken by the City with respect to the 1987 Project are necessary to secure the redevelopment of the property included in the 1987 Project Area, at this time and in a manner which will best meet those needs. D. Statement of Objectives. The objectives sought to be accomplished by the HRA and the City in establishing and carrying out the 1987 Project and in financing of the Public Redevelopment Cost thereof, as specified herein, are to meet the needs specified in the Original Plan and in paragraph C: a. by promoting and securing the prompt and orderly redevelopment of the property in the 1987 Project Area in a manner consistent with applicable governmental comprehensive plans and with a minimal adverse impact on the enviro.nment; b. by controlling the intensities of land uses to alleviate existing and future traffic impacts on France Avenue and the road system in the southeast area of the City; C. by promoting and securing additional housing for the elderly, persons of low and moderate income and other residents of the City and surrounding area at a reasonable cost, thereby enhancing living conditions and their general health and welfare; -3- d. by securing the increase of property subject to taxation by the City, Hennepin County and the school district in which the 1987 Project Area is located, and other local government taxing jurisdictions, in order to better enable such entities to pay for public improvements and governmental services and programs required to be provided by them; and e. by undertaking and providing moneys for the payment of the cost of Redevelopment Activities in or adjacent to the 1987 Project Area which are necessary to serve the 1987 Project Area and for the orderly and beneficial development of the 1987 Project Area and adjacent areas of the City. II. 1987 PROJECT A. Description of 1987 Project. 1. 1987 Project Area. The 1987 Project Area is primarily unimproved and .is located in the City. The legal description of the 1987 Project Area is as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. The 1987 Project Area is not presently owned by the HRA. 2. Conditions of Blight. The 1987 Project Area is blighted by virtue of conditions of unusual and difficult physical characteristics of the ground and other conditions which has prevented normal development of the land by private enterprise and has resulted in stagnant and unproductive conditions of land. However, the 1987 Project Area is potentially useful and valuable for redevelopment which would contribute to the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The 1987 Project Area will not be reasonably available for redevelopment by private enterprise. or redeveloped by private enterprise, in the foreseeable future, unless the blighting conditions thereof are removed. The City and the HRA can remove, or cause or assist a Developer to remove, such blighting conditions, and.to redevelop the 1987 Project Area by.construction and installation thereon of the Private Improvements, the Public Improvements and the Park by jointly exercising the powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose. 3. Redevelopment Activities. The 1987 Project includes the following Redevelopment Activities: a. By the City or the HRA, directly or pursuant to a Redevelopment Agreement with a Developer: (1) the acquisition by the HRA of all or substantially all of the 1987,Project -4- Area; (2) the payment of SAC and of water connection charges, the physical 'preparation of the 1987 Project Area by development by the grading of the 1987 Project Area and the making of soil corrections and construction of a storm water holding pond and the construction and installation of public streets and public utilities, the conveyance to Developers of the portions of the 1987 Project Area on which the Private Improvements are to be constructed, the construction or installation of the Park, the Public Improvements and other public amenities all as provided for in a Redevelopment Agreement; and (3) the making of studies and planning and informational activities relating to the 1987 Project. b. By a Developer: (1) the construction and installation of the Private Improvement; (2) the performance of such Redevelopment Activities on behalf of the City or the HRA as may be required by the City or the HRA and specified in a Redevelopment Agreement, subject to reimbursement of the cost thereof by the City or the HRA from Tax Increments to be derived from the District; (3) the payment and financing of the cost of the Private Improvement; and (4) the operation of the Private Improvements. C. No contracts have been entered into for Redevelopment Activities. d. No development other than that described in this Section 3 is presently proposed to take place in the 1987 Project Area. B. Development of 1987 Project Area. 1. Use. The property in the 1987 Project Area will be redeveloped by the construction and installation of the Park, the Private Improvements and the Public Improvements. 2. Redevelopment Agreements. Upon acquisition of the 1987 Project Area by the HRA, the property in the 1987 Project Area on which the Private Improvements are to be located will be sold by the HRA to a Developer for redevelopment pursuant to one or more Redevelopment Agreements under which, among other things, a Developer will be required to construct and install the Private Improvement by a specified date, the Private Improvements to have at least a specified minimum number of square feet and a specified minimum cost; to complete certain percentages of the work by specified dates pursuant to plans and specifications submitted to and building permits issued by or on behalf of the City, and pursuant to and in accordance with all other applicable governmental regulations; and to demonstrate its financial capability for so doing. IS C. Relocation. No person will be displaced and have to be relocated as a result of the 1987 Project. . III. FINANCING OF PUBLIC REDEVELOPMENT COST OF 1987 PROJECT ..The Public Redevelopment Cost of -the 1987 Project will be paid from the tax increment derived from the-District and from tax increment to be derived from one or more tax increment financing districts containing parcels in the 1987 Project Area if established by the HRA. At the present time the 1987 Project Area is not included in any.tax increment financing districts but it is the 'intent of the HRA to establish one or more tax increment financing districts comprising the 1987 Project Area at a future date in order to finance the =:ortion of the Public Redevelopment Cost of the 1987 Project not paid from tax increment derived from the District. IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF 1987 PROJECT A. In General. The 1987 Project and this 1987 Amendment shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA. B. Cooperation Agreement. If necessary, the City and the HRA shall enter into a Cooperation Agreement for the purpose of specifying the duties and responsibilities of each with respect to the implementation of the 1987 Project and this 1987 Amendment, and the application of the Tax Increments to be derived from the 1987 Project Area. V. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The City and the HRA reserve the right to alter the 1987 Project and to further amend or modify the Plan by their joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. VI. ORIGINAL PLAN The Original Plan except to the extent the provisions thereof are explicitly "amended O- "r supplemented by'this 1987. Amendment-shall remain in and be in full force and effect. • .tr -6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF 1987 PROJECT AREA. J "'f M 1-7 — jr- ffgA- CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I, the undersigned, being the Executive Director of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA), hereby certify that I am the recording officer for the HRA and that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of a resolution entitled "Resolution Approving the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the HRA at a meeting duly called and held by the Board of Commissioners on June 15, 1987. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of June, 1987. Executive Director Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA and the Edina City Council have previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 445.421, subdivision 13. It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to the Plan, designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Amendment "), which among other things, enlarges the Plan Area. 2. The 1987 Amendment is described in the document entitled "1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1987 Amendment as so described is hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the 1987 Amendment. Dated this 15th day of June, 1987. Chairman Attest: Executive Director The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Chairman and his signature - attested by the Executive Director. CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN City: City of E Governing Body: Kind, date, time held on June 15, Members present: Members absent: dina, Minnesota City Council,; and place of meeting: A regular meeting, 1987, at 7:00. o= 'clock P.M.,, at the City -Hall. Kelly, Richards; Smith, Turner, Courtney None Documents attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): 1 and 2 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I, the undersigned, being the.duly qualified and acting recording officer of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the City in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a.correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the City Council of the City, and is a correct and complete copy of a resolution approved by the City Council at said meeting; and that said meeting was duly held by the City Council at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer this day of , 1987. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk Member resolution and moved its adoption: introduced the following RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project, under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. seq., designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The HRA has approved amendments to the Plan designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Amendment), which among other things, enlarges the Plan Area, and has requested that this Council approve the 1987 Amendment. This Council held a public hearing on the 1987 Amendment on June 15, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be.heard on the subject were given an opportunity- with respect thereto. 2. Approval. The 1987 Amendment is hereby approved. 3. Findings Under the Municipal Housing and Redevelopment Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that: .(A) The land located within the 1987 Project Area, as defined in the 1987 Amendment would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought; (B) The redevelopment plans for the 1987 Project Area as set forth in the 1987 Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment.of the 1987 Project Area by private enterprise; and (C) The 1987 Amendment conforms to..the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Passed by the Council this 15th day of June, 1987. C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor Attest: Marcella Daehn, City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing was duly seconded by Member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted and was signed by the Mayor and his signature attested by the City Clerk. -2- R I ITEM III. A. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Fairview Southdale Hospital Medical Office Building Proposal (P -86 -5) DATE: June 10, 1987 You will recall the City Council, at its May 18, meeting, continued the subject request for a month to allow the proponents time to consider modifications to their plan. Revised plans have been submitted for Council review. The size, location, and materials for the building remain unchanged. All proposed modifications relate to the parking ramp. First, the northerly 55 feet of the ramp has been eliminated . Second, the two -level portion of the ramp along the easterly property line has been reduced. Adjacent to the Colony property line, the two -level portion has been reduced from 672 feet to 408 feet. The revised northerly parking would include a basement level and one level slightly above the existing grade. Total on -site parking has been reduced by 19 spaces. The proposed berm and landscaping remain as previously proposed. Irrigation of the entire site is included with the proposed landscaping. 3 June 1987 Honorable Mayor Courtney, Planning Commission, and City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 CONSULTING PLANNERS LANDSCAPE- ARCIIITEC'T�, 300 FIRST AVE,NUF i,70i FH SUITE 210 MINNEAPOLIS, NIN X5401 u12:i,39n3U0 City Council Staff Dear Mayor Courtney, Council, Commission, and Staff: At the May 18th City Council meeting concerns were raised over the view to the east side of the parking ramp from the Colony Condominiums. The developers have addressed this concern in the past by eliminating an entire level of parking and intensifying the landscaping on the east side of the ramp. In addition to the past solutions, the developers are proposing to revise the design of the ramp and reduce the visual impact to the Colony residents. Two significant adjustments have been made to the ramp. First, the overall length has been reduced by eliminating 55 feet from the northern tip. This adjustment will create more green space and open up the view to the freeway. Second, the upper level of the proposed ramp has been redesigned to reduce the ' actual amount of ramp directly facing the Condominiums. The second level has been angled to the northwest to create a stepped affect. The berm and landscaping proposed in the past would remain the same. The second level of the ramp facing the Condominiums has been reduced in length from 672 feet to 408 feet, a reduction of 264 feet. The ramp has expanded to the northwest to accommodate parking displaced by stepping the ramp on the second level. The combination of stepping the ramp and maintaining the landscaped berm will significantly reduce the visual impact of the ramp from the Colony Condominiums. We are looking forward to presenting the revised design to the City Council on June 15th. Sincerely, DAHLGREN, SHA DLOW, AND UBAN, INC. off M rtin Landscape Architect GM /gms cc: Doug Robinson Del Einess ill III III III � ' III III III III III III �I IIC - II II - II II I- - - PH V SICIAN = I GENERAL PARKING - 21. TO T11L PARKING Lu- I I I DI Zi Lu tu '-- �-37 II Iw II III II III II II 1 II II I II III li 'Il II i� II II II II II I II II iiII II II II —WEST 65th STREET_ LF- O Lap'. DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY ZONING TOTAL SITE ACREAGE ALLOWABLE FAR. PROPOSED FAR. REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT 13.24 ACRES 1.0 .77 EXISTNG BUILDING AREA 374,000 G.F.A. SNOT INCLUDING POWER PLANT) SPROPOSED NEW BUILDING 68,328 G.F.A. \ (76,032 Gross Building Area) TOTAL BULDNG AREA 442,328 G.F.A. PARKING REQUIRED: MOH 5/1000 n.s.t. plus 1/ doctor Hospital 399 810 Total 1209 PARKING PROVIDED: Ramp Basement Level 224 First Level 408 Second Level 355 Ramp, Total 987 — Surface Parking 222 r Total Parking Provided 1209 DEVELOPMENT PLAN FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE PHYSICIANS MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING EDINA, MINNESOTA V �Nv �,- ,•9�G1 f,,, ;101 ?� 11j. Two Level I I I 1 I I � I � PROPOSED S' SANITARY SEWEI 1\ _ -1 ___ _�___ GRADING LIMITS D _1 COLONY CONDOMINIUMS ILLUSTRATIVE GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN LF� NORTN o ao' 4o' fo' SECTION A -A' SCALE 1': 4' -0' SECTION B -B' SCALE 1": 4' -0' � w ..r n�w .orh ++.r• m _ __&_k� ----------- SW ALE —PROPERTY LINE GRADING LIMITS GRADE PROPERTY LINE I I SWALEI IIEXST14G GRADE 8, 5 FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE PHYSICIANS MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING EDINA, MINNESOTA It C MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE EDINA SCHOOL BOARD HELD AT BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE MAY 11, 1987 Council Members Present: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney School Board Members Present: Atchison, Birkeland, Gleason, Hite, Jones, Mitchell, Moe and Smyth (Ex Officio) Also present were City and School staff members and other interested citizens. The Edina .City Council and the Edina School Board held an informal joint meeting at 8:00 p.m. on May 11, 1987 at the Braemar Clubhouse for the purpose of receiving reports, identifying issues and discussing concerns. The following reports were given: -1) Community Services Task Force Final Report, by Co- Chairs Leslie Turner, Council and James Hamann, School; 2) Edina Housing and Population Report, by Craig Larsen, City Planner, and Report on Edinborough, by Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager; 3) Enrollment and Facility Projections, by Jim Chapman, Director of Personnel Services. A report on Community Education Needs Assessment was presented by Rod Brannon, Community Education.Coordinator, and then each member of the Council and School Board were asked to express what they felt were present needs for community education in Edina. These included: - More courses for senior citizens with consideration for their transportation needs. - Volunteer opportunities for young people. - More activities for men, perhaps "club" type activities. - Alcohol and drug abuse programs for adults, including working with policy statements of various organizations pertaining to drugs and managing the information already available. - Integration of the Park and Recreation Department master plan with activities of the new Community Services Board. - Delivery of some of the senior citizens courses at the Senior Center, at Edinborough and other locations. - Programs for troubled kids. - Cooperation on classes in the high school as enrollment declines, with offerings to sutdents and adults. - Research about the appropriateness of current courses as they relate to changing students, families and life styles. - Make parents better partners in the learning process - homework, advocates for their children, better handling of conferences, etc. - Attracting people who do not have children in the schools into the program area. - Service and volunteer opportunities for students. - Day care needs education for single mothers. - Aiding people in linkage to resources, both educational and human service organizations. It was agreed that the presentations, exchange of information and general discussion between the Council and the School Board was of benefit to both bodies. No formal action was taken by the Council. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 P.M. C.i Yv r,I ark MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT THE BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE MAY 12, 1987 Council.Members Present: Kelly, Richards, Smith,-Turner and Mayor Courtney. Others Present: Members of the Edina Park Board Members of the Community Development and Planning Commission Members of the Development Team City Staff The meeting was held at the Braemar Clubhouse at 5:00 p.m. and was chaired.by Member Richards. Member Richards explained that this was an informal, informational, meeting for.the purpose of having the Development Team present their concept for development of the Hedberg property and to respond to questions and comments from the Council and the.advisory boards. Peter Jarvis, Master Planner with BRW and spokesman for the development team, introduced the members of the team. By use of graphics Mr. Jarvis presented the following: 1) Project objectives, 2) Existing topography, 3) Master Plan of the Development,.4) Timeframe and phases of the project, 5) Open Space Plan and Uses, and 6) Preliminary Transit Demand Management Plan. In conclusion, he said that a complete traffic impact analysis is needed for the scoping document that will be required in preparing an Environment Impact Statement. An Indirect Source Permit will also be part of the process before submitting the proposed project to the Park Board, the Community Development and Planning Commission and, lastly, the Council. The hard financial analysis will also be worked on prior to any public hearings. Mr. Jarvis said their target is to come before the Planning Commission and the Council in August and September this year and to begin construction in June of 1988 with Phase I. The Development Team then responded to questions and comments from the Council and the advisory board members. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. with no formal action taken by the Council. City Clerk w. MINUTES Draft Minutes OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 1, 1987 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. ROBERT BURESH COMMENDED. Manager Rosland commented that Robert Buresh retired from the position of Public Safety Director as of May 29, 1987, having worked for the City since 1949 when he started on the then Volunteer Fire Department. He became a fulltime employee in 1957 and progressed to Fire Chief and then to Public Safety Director. Among Mr. Buresh's many achievements was the development of the Fire Department into one of the finest in the country, the nurturing of the City's paramedic service and the merging of the Fire and Building Departments with regard to building inspections to promote public safety. Mr. Rosland commended him for his many years of dedicated service to the City and presented him with a silver pen bearing the City logo. Members of the Council also expressed their appreciation and thanks to him. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the consent agenda, with the exception of the removal of items IV.A.1 and 2 and IX.A. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF MAY 18, 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to approve the minutes of the regular Council Meeting of May 18, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONCLUDED: STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -278 ORDERED. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the public hearing on Street Improvement No. BA -278 (Link Road) was continued from the meeting of May 18, 1987 to allow for additional discussion on design and access issues and development of a plan acceptable to all parties. As background to this project, Mr. Hoffman said this is a continuation of an initial hearing involving what is known as Issue Area 1 in the Grandview Area Traffic Study prepared by BRW in April, 1984. The neighbors in Richmond Hills 2nd Addition have supported the current proposal to resolve what.has been a continuing problem at Eden Avenue and Vernon Avenue. Additionally, overall traffic operations have been reviewed in light of existing and potential developments in the Grandview Area. Mr. Hoffman explained that the general area under discussion includes Vernon Avenue /Eden Avenue /Link Road /West 53rd Street. This proposed improvement would be another phase of the Grandview area plan. It would close off Eden Avenue at Vernon and would include a traffic signal at Link Road. To make the project work, additional right of way will need to be acquired from . Superamerica. Earlier the Council approved construction of sidewalk along the north and west side of Vernon Avenue. Because Superamerica would be affected the most, staff had met with them on several occasions as well as with Hennepin County. Mr. Hoffman said that he also has met with First Minnesota Bank as to any concerns they might have with the closing of the Eden Avenue access. They indicated that they had no objection but wanted to maintain good visibility. He said that Superamerica had some concerns with the initial proposal as to access to their property. In subsequent meetings with Superamerica the plan has been revised to add a right turn lane on Vernon Avenue from west of Link Road to the first westerly driveway of Jerry's with a new curb cut from Vernon Avenue into Superamerica. This change would address a major concern that staff had had for easterly bound vehicles trying to enter Superamerica via Link Road and also would alleviate Superamerica's concerns regarding access to their property from Vernon Avenue. This would result in an increased cost estimate for the project from $170,047.24 to $194,354.33. Mr. Hoffman said that at this point Superamerica and Hennepin County are in agreement with that change in the plan and before staff can proceed on the right of way issues the Council must approve the project. Ron Cohen, representing the Richmond Hills Home Improvement Association, said that they have been looking for this for the past 30 years. Member Smith asked what traffic controls there would be at Eden Avenue /Link Road and how the project is proposed to be funded. In response, Mr. Hcffman said there would be a STOP sign for Eden Avenue traffic at Link Road and that Eden would have three lanes, with a 90 degree intersection at Link. In view of possible future redevelopment in the area with additional traffic, Member Smith questioned whether a right turn lane out of Eden with a YIELD sign might be a more preferable design. Mr. Hoffman said if the proposed design did not work well in the future, a one -lane, one way out for right turns could be provided. Mr. Hoffman said the project would be funded by HRA funds. Mr. Hughes explained that at the time the Grandview parking ramp that is under construction was approved the City sold a $2,000,000 bond issue. The purpose of that issue was to provide funds for the construction of the ramp as well as this improvement. Those bonds will be repaid by tax increments received within the Grandview Redevelopment District and that no portion of the cost of the subject improvement will be assessed. He added that there is adequate increment coming out of the district to fund this improvement. Mr. Cohen asked as to the timeframe for the project. Mr. Hoffman said if the project is approved by the • I Council and the right of way issues are resolved, the project can be completed later this year. No further comment or objection being heard,.Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING LINK ROAD IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -278 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel within the affected area on the following proposed improvement: PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -278 and at the hearing held at.the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -278, cost of which shall be paid from Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall:. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NOS S -38 AND S -39 ORDERED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth: A. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -38 IN THE FOLLOWING; Olinger Boulevard from Bredesen Park Path to Tracy Avenue Engineer Hoffman advised that this informal public hearing has been called as a result of requests from residents in this area for better pedestrian access to Bredesen Park . He explained that this sidewalk improvement is part of the Bredesen Park project and would close the one missing link for sidewalk access to the park. The estimated cost of the improvement is $28,242.25 and it is proposed to pay the entire cost from Municipal State Aid funds with no assessment against abutting property. Under present City policy, he said that snow removal of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide, constructed of Portland Cement concrete and would be constructed along the south side of Olinger Boulevard, abutting Countryside Park, Colonial Church and Nine Mile Village property. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. Mr. Hoffman said that representative of Nine Mile Village Townhouse Association have met with staff and support the sidewalk project. He advised that a letter of objection to the project has been received from Jeanne BeVier, 6216 Sandpiper Court. No public comment or further objection being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -38 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel within the affected area on the following proposed improvement: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -38 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -38, cost of which shall be paid from Municipal State Aid finds. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. B. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -39 IN THE FOLLOWING; West 70th Street from Valley View Road to France Avenue Engineer Hoffman said that this informal public hearing on construction of sidewalk on the north sid3 of West 70th Street is the result of concerns expressed by child care providers on the north side for better pedestrian access to the Cornelia School Park area. He explained that -this sidewalk improvement is not in the capital plan but that he felt the safety issue for the children was important. It is proposed to pay the entire cost of the improvement, estimated at $18,134.34, from Municipal State Aid Funds. Maintenance of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of Portland Cement concrete. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible. Member Turner asked if any other sidewalk project would be bumped in this year's capital plan in order to pay.for the construction from Municipal State Aid funds. In response, Mr. Hoffman said that because the France Avenue project has been dropped back there are adequate funds available. Member Smith questioned the City's policy on snow removal from sidewalks and the ongoing funding for this maintenance. Mr. Hoffman explained that prior to 1973 the City virtually had no sidewalks except for those that were neighborhood oriented and which were maintained by the residents. Prior to that point in time the City on various occasions held public hearings to construct sidewalks and assess the cost to benefitted properties. All such hearings failed because of objections from the property owners affected. Mr. Hoffman said that in 1973 the City changed its policy by saying we would look at establishing sidewalk on at least one side of high volume collector roadways to be paid out of Municipal State Aid funds. The City does receive annually funds for maintenance of those sidewalks and does get adequate funds for both the capital expenditure and maintenance of those sidewalk. No public comment or objection being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -39 BE IT RESOLVED by.the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly mailed to owners of each parcel within the affected area on the following proposed improvement: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -39 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement; that said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S -39, cost of which shall be paid from Municipal State Aid funds. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 1. BRAEMAR HILLS 11TH ADDITION (7700 MARCH COURT AND 5901 LONG BRAKE TRAIL). Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition except the northerly 30 feet thereof; and Lot 2, Block 2, Braemar Hills 10th Addition and the northerly 30 feet of Lot 5, Block 1, Braemar Hills 11th Addition. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 5. BLOCK 1. INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION (6537 -39 MC CAULEY TRAIL). Member Smith stated that he had asked that agenda items IV.A.2 and 4 be removed from the consent agenda because he questioned the division of lots of less than 100 foot in width into separate parcels when the Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum lot size. Mr. Larsen explained that party wall division of double unit dwellings are requested to facilitate individual ownership of the units for tax purposes and that for ordinance purposes the division is really an imaginary line; that the key is the initial zoning of the property which distinguished between the R -1 and R -2 lots as to appropriate size. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested -the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition lying southeasterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot 5, distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner thereof, to a point on the North line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62 feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner thereof, as measured along said North line. and That part of Lot 5, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition lying northwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said Lot 5, distant 46.32 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner thereof, to a point on the North line of said Lot 5, distant 53.62 feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner thereof, as measured along said North line. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City,of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate.tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 7, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION (6545 MC CAULEY TRAIL AND 630L TIMBER TRAIL). Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 7, Block 1, INdian Hills 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line and its southerly extention drawn from a point o the North line of said Lot 7 distant 63.5 feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 7, to a point on the South line of said Lot 7 distant 43.14 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 7, and there terminating; and That part of Lot 7, Block 1, Indian Hills 3rd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the North line of said Lot 7 distant 63.5 feet northwesterly of the Northeast corner.of said Lot 7, to a point on the South line of said lot 7 distant 43.14 feet northwesterly of the Southeast corner of said Lot 7, and there terminating. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and.said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the.City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the.provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 5, BLOCK 2. STOW'S EDGEMOOR ADDITION (7015 -17 LYNMAR LANE). Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel A: That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of a line, and its extentions, drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, as measured along said east line, and subject to easements of record; and Parcel B: That part of Lot 5, Block 2, Stow's Edgemoor Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying south of a line, and its extentions, drawn from a point on the west line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, as measured along said west line, to a point on the east line of said Lot 5 distant 47.00 feet north of the southwest corner thereof, as measured along said east line, and subject to easements of record. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts.of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the.C-ity of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR JERRY'S ENTERPRISES (5101 VERNON AVENUE). Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following describer property is at present a single tract of land: (Legal description to be supplied by surveyor) WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of sait tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: (Legal description to be supplied by surveyor) WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of .land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly setting June 15, 1987 as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Final Development Plan - Building Expansion - Edina Theater, 3911 W. 50th St 2) Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion - Normandale Lutheran Church, 6100 Normandale Rd 3) Amendments to Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ORDINANCE NOS. 825 -A18 AND 711 -A4 TO ALLOW CURBSIDE PICK -UP OF YARD WASTE IN THE MORNINGSIDE AREA ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mr. Hughes recalled that Ordinance Nos. 825 -A18 and 711 -A4 which deal with the curbside pick -up compost program in the Morningside area were given First Reading at the meeting of May 4, 1987. No comment being heard, Member Kelly offered the following ordinances for Second Reading and moved adoption: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A1 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING PARAGRAPH B(2) OF SECTION 7 OF ORDINANCE NO. 825 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Repealer. Paragraph B(2) of Sec. 7 of Ordinance No. 825 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 711 -a4 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON THE CURB ON A TEMPORARY BASIS FOR A PORTION OF NORTHEAST EDINA THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting "(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4 and by adding a new paragraph "(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows: "(b) Within that portion of the City located north of Sunnyside Road and east of Wooddale Avenue, grass clippings and leaves suitable for composting may be placed next to the street or curb for pick -up provided that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored within a plastic bag designed for such a purpose, and ii) placed at the curb no more than 12 hours prior to the scheduled pick -up." Sec. 2. The provision of Sec. 4(b) of this Ordinance No. 711 shall automatically cease and be of no further effect on December 1, 1987. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication, but- -not earlier than August 1, 1987. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor Motion for'Second Reading and adoption of the ordinances was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Ordinances adopted. CONCERN OF CITIZEN HEARD REGARDING TAPE RECORDINGS BY POLICE OFFICERS. Ronald Weeks, 5113 Blossom Court, stated that he was concerned about the practice of allowing police officers to use concealed devices without disclosure to tape record conversations they are having with citizens on routine matters. Mr. Weeks said that he would expound on the letters he has sent to the Council. In the first letter he had mentioned that the tape recording incident was an attempt to extract an involuntary confession from him and did border on his rights of privacy. He said he has reviewed the tape recording and that there was an audible omission in the conversation between Officer Kleinberg and himself. Mr. Weeks said that Mr. Rosland indicated by letter that police officers violate no law or duty in tape recording conversations with citizens in the course of arrest or detention. Further,. the letter mentioned that the tape recordings are used only for administrative purposes. For those officers who may employ such a technique, the procedure is used to protect the officer from complaints levied against him which lack foundation. The Police Department has articulated a policy on the matter which basically states that the practice is.not encouraged nor is it prohibited. Mr. Weeks said that it is necessary to bring the matter into focus -- matters of arrest and detention. He said that the incident was only a routine traffic stop - -10 mph over the speed limit at 8:00 a.m. on Interlachen Boulevard -- something that did not warrant arrest or detention that would allow a police officer to properly use a tape recording. He questioned, if indeed the tape recordings are made for administrative purposes, why they need to be made with concealed devices and without disclosure to the citizen. The fact that there is really no policy or direction for the police on whether or not they should use these devices is an open invitation for abuse of a privilege that is allowed under the law and by certain court rulings that do allow the police to use tape recordings in the investigation of serious criminal matters. Mr. Weeks said he has asked the Council members individually to express their opinion as to the propriety of allowing this practice to continue. He asked that the Council take a position to either prohibit this activity in the future or to openly endorse the present practice and encourage it to continue. Specifically, he asked that the Council direct the Police Department of Edina in the future to prohibit by explicit instructions the recordings of conversations with citizens on routine matters, reserving the right to use tape recordings in the investigation of serious criminal matters. Mayor Courtney commented that the Council has made every effort to cut down speeding in the City and has worked with the county to reduce speed limits on roadways such as Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Weeks responded that the issue of speeding was a separate issue from the conduct of the officer involved in the incident. Member Smith commented that he had not responded to Mr.- Week's letter because of the threat to go public with this, that he had discussed the matter with Member Richards regarding inviting Mr. Weeks to appear before the Council as the proper forum for considering his concerns._ He reiterated that the Council is attempting to reduce speeding offenses in the City and that he had asked the Chief of Police to-publish the areas that are being patrolled which was done. As to the alleged gap in the tape recording, Member Smith said he would consider that a more serious charge. Manager Rosland said that the officers that are assigned to the task of speed control have a difficult assignment and that they are told to be polite and courteous to citizens that they stop. He said that when a complaint is received the department works with that officer. Member Kelly commented that the City has a policy that allows this to happen; that speed control is a trial project for one year and then will be reviewed. She suggested that.the Council discuss this further when they review the speed control program. Member Smith commented that he would not be prepared r . to suggest any action to be taken by the Council at this time. No formal action was taken. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO BOXES FOR DUMP TRUCKS. Motion was made by Member .Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for two boxes for dump trucks to recommended low bidder, Midland Equipment, at $15,590.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR UTILITY TOOL BOX BODY. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for one utility tool box body for a utility truck to recommended low bidder, Lahass Manufacturing and Sales, at $5,993.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. COUNCIL RESPONSIBILITIES FINALIZED. Mayor Courtney called the Council's attention to the final draft of the Council Responsibilities assignments and asked for any comment. Member Turner reiterated her concern that there be two members on the Personnel Committee as was established by formal action of the Council. After some discussion, Mayor Courtney appointed Member Kelly to serve with him on the committee. The matter of the advisory boards /commissions appointment process was discussed. It was agreed that the process should be reviewed and that the matter of successive terms should also be discussed. Following some discussion, Mayor Courtney appointed Members Richards and Smith to assume the responsibility of Advisory Boards and Commissions Policies. It was suggested that they review the appointment process and also the issue of number of terms and bring a recommendation to the Council. Member Turner commented that a calendar should be set up to meet once a year with the advisory boards and commissions as was discussed previously by the Council. Following discussion, it was decided that Members Richards and Smith should also work on this and bring back their recommendation to the Council as to how to proceed. GOOSE CONTROL PROJECT APPROVED. Manager Rosland reported that, as directed by the Council, a public hearing was conducted on May 28, 1987 concerning the proposed goose control project. Dr. James Cooper of the University of Minnesota and the Agricultural Research Station made a presentation concerning the population dynamics of geese and outlined the proposed management program which involves capturing geese during their flightless period in June and subsequently translocating them out of state. He said that 13 residents attended the meeting and all were in favor of initiating the program. No one spoke in opposition to the project. Staff would recommend that the Council authorize the three year goose control project. Mr. Rosland pointed out that the annual cost of the program is estimated to be $3,266.00 and that part of this cost is expected to be defrayed by- donations. No objection being heard, Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby authorizes the Agricultural Experiment Station to proceed with a three year program of goose translocation at an annual estimated cost of $3,266.00. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: .Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. 1987 CONTRACT WITH LOCAL 49 (OPERATING ENGINEERS UNION) APPROVED. Manager Rosland advised that for several years the City has participated jointly in labor negotiations with Local No. 49 of the Operating Engineers Union who represent the City's Public Works and Park maintenance employees. These joint negotiations are done by a committee which represents Edina and also 22 other cities through the Metropolitan Area Managers Association (MAMA). Representation of the cities through this committee provides for metropolitan wide consistency in dealing with economic issues as proposed by this union. This year the committee has negotiated a 3% increase in wages and an additional ten dollar contribution toward the employees' health insurance. Mr. Rosland said that this settlement is within the budgeted amount that the City anticipated and is the same percentage of increase granted to the non -union employees. Staff would recommend that the Council take formal action to approve this increase. This would conclude the City's participation at the master contract level. He added that as part of the total labor agreement with Local No. 49, and in addition to the master contract, each city has a local addendum to the master contract. It is within this addendum that local issues (i.e. vacation, holidays, severance, etc.) are agreed upon. At this time the City is still negotiating on settlement of the local issues and hope to bring a settlement to the Council for consideration as soon as possible. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to approve the 1987 Contract with Local No. 49 of IUOE as negotiated with the MAMA Labor Negotiation Committee and as presented by the City Manager. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. . "EDINA POLICE REPORT" WINS ACE AWARD FOR SECOND TIME. Manager Rosland said he was proud to announce that the television program the "Edina Police Report" has brought home the Award for Cable Excellence (ACE) for the second time; the program was also honored in 1983. The series, produced by members of the Edina Police Department since 1983, was one of 34 winners nationwide in the annual competition sponsored by the National Academy of Cable Programming. It won in the Program Series /Information category. Mr. Rosland said Eric Felton, producer and Chris Hamren, program host, were on hand to accept the award which was presented May 18th at the Las Vegas Hilton Showroom. Eric Felton then presented a.video of portions of the series that won the award. The Council commended Mr. Felton for the excellent quality of the work. UPDATE GIVEN ON SWENSONS ICE CREAM RESTAURANT. Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to ,a report by the City Sanitarian on Swensons Ice Cream Restaurant, noting that eight inspections have been performed and passed by the restaurant pursuant to the action taken by the Council on May 4, 1987. He recalled that at the license revocation proceedings the Council was informed by the owners that the restaurant was being sold and a change of ownership would take place on or about May 28, 1987. As of this date, the restaurant has not changed ownership; the tentative date is now June 4, 1987. Mr. Velde, Sanitarian, intends to continue inspecting the restaurant until the change of ownership takes place. He has recommended that one inspection per week would be appropriate at this time due to the improvements which have taken place over the past four weeks. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to approve the change on inspections of Swensons restaurant to one time a week. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON CITY WELL WATER PROGRAM. Engineer Hoffman presented a report on the City's well water supply which included: 1) Projected water consumption ratios and rates.from the water system study completed for the City in 1969, 2) Table of Projected Water Consumption based on the 1969 study showing projected water consumption to the year 1985, not including fire flow, and 3) Table of Total Water Demand to the year 1985 for maximum day including fire flow. He noted that in 1985 the City used an average of 73 million gallons per day. However, in 1986 (wet year) the average use was 6.4 million gallons per day. The current well system can produce 21.762 mgd with 6 million gallons in reservoirs and elevated tanks. Mr. Hoffman explained that the current inability we have is the very short term demand peaks that usually occur on a late Saturday afternoon. This results in short term low pressure in certain portions of the community. He added that we do not sacrifice our fire reserve to maintain adequate pressure at all times. So far in 1987 it has been .necessary to have a total sprinkling ban on two occasions. Mr. Hoffman said that he had reviewed the report with the consultant and they agreed that additional wells will be required for the development of the Carl Hansen and Hedberg properties. An additional iron removal treatment plant may also be required. He observed that the Capital Plan calls for an additional well. In conclusion, Mr. Hoffman recommended that staff conduct a feasibility.study for additional wells and reservoirs. Following discussion, Member Turner moved that staff proceed with the feasibility study as recommended by the Engineer. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney UTILITY EASEMENT FOR NORTHWESTERN BELL APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman advised that Northwestern Bell has requested an easement, 15 x 15 feet, on the northwest corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Amundson Terrace for installation of a communications cabinet. He said that the City currently uses the lot for public works purposes for storage and that the lot was acquired for public use when it went tax forfeit. The Public Works Department would recommend granting an easement to Northwestern Bell conditioned upon the City retaining its use of the land as a public works area. Member Smith suggested that the easement document contain a "hold harmless" clause to protect the City and that the easement be granted subject to termination if the property would ever revert to the State of Minnesota. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Mayor and Manager be authorized to execute an easement to Northwestern Bell on Lot 1, Block 1,Amundson Terrace for installation of a communications cabinet, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the easement document provide for a "hold harmless" clause to protect the City and that it be granted subject to termination if the property reverts to the State of Minnesota. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. RENEWAL OF CLUB LIQUOR LICENSES APPROVED. Manager Rosland advised that applications for renewal of Club On -Sale Liquor and Sunday Licenses for the Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club for the period July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988 have been received. Renewal of these licenses is recommended, subject to completion of staff reviewal and approval and clearance by the State Liquor Control Division. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly approving issuance of Club On- Sale.and Sunday Liquor License renewals for the Edina Country Club and the Interlachen Country Club. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AMENDMENT TO JERRY'S ENTERPRISES AGREEMENT APPROVED. Attorney Erickson advised that because the City is also a signer on the Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement with Jerry's Enterprises that the Council must approve the amendment which was presented to the HRA Commissioners earlier. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it hereby approves the amendment to the Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement with Jerry's Enterprises and authorizes and directs the execution thereof by City officials. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. PETITION FOR NOISE BARRIER DISCUSSED. Member Turner said that she had asked the matter of the petition for a noise barrier opposite T.H. 100 between Minnehaha Creek Bridge and 44th Street be removed from the consent agenda so that the Council could discuss which direction to go on this. The Council should decide whether to ask staff to prepare a feasibility report on the project, or to not take any action, or to hold a public hearing to give the residents an opportunity to talk about it. Manager Rosland said that because this is the first petition that the City has received for construction of a noise barrier with the cost to be financed by special assessment that staff would like to prepare a report giving the Council past history and additional information on noise barriers. Engineer Hoffman added that he would like to invite someone from the Pollution Control Agency (PCA) to explain how noise barriers work before the Council makes a decision. Member Turner said the Council would need a lot of information to make a change in its policy that construction of noise barriers should not be the City's obligation. It was informally agreed that staff should provide additional background information to the Council regarding noise barriers before any action is taken. Member Smith suggested that the residents be advised when this information would be presented to the Council. Mr. Hoffman said that is what he had in mind. REVIEW OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REQUESTED BY MEMBER SMITH. Member Smith said that he would like the Council to again review the City's Comprehensive Plan with regard to land densities and definitions because he had concerns with the recent Namron development and in view of the proposed development of the Hedberg property. Member Kelly commented that she felt this is important to do before even considering the development of the Hedberg property and that the Council should consider whether the Plan is consistent with the City's Mission Statement. Member Turner stated that the.Council did review the Comprehensive Plan two years ago and that it is worth doing frequently and particularly now that there has been'a change in the composition of the Council. She suggested that the Council do the review in a workshop session to identify the issues before bringing them to a public hearing. Following some discussion, Member Smith made a motion that the .Council have a'workshop session to review the land use issue and the Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, to be accomplished by August, 1987. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. RECOGNITION OF SPECIAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF INDIVIDUALS DISCUSSED. Member Kelly said that she felt recognition should be given to individuals for special accomplishments which as that of Eric Felton in achieving the ACE award or members of our boards and commissions when they leave the board /commission. Manager Rosland said that this was for Eric Felton when the first ACE award was given in 1983. Mayor Courtney commented that he does write a letter to individuals when they leave a board or commission to thank them for their contribution. 1987 -88 WORK PROGRAM TO BE PREPARED. Member Turner said that following the Council Workshop in March a meeting had been scheduled for June 8, 1987 to discuss the 1987 -88 Work Program for the City. She said that in discussing this with Mr. Hughes that they had agreed that the proposed Work Program could be placed on the June 15, 1987 agenda to be discussed if time permits or the Council could discuss it at the July 6, 1987 meeting. Manager Rosland concurred that it could be done at the June 15, 1987 regular meeting and said it would be on that agenda. MAYOR WELCOMES DAVE DUFF BACK. Mayor Courtney commented that he was glad to see Dave Duff of the Edina Sun - Current at the meeting, following a long absence, and welcomed him. LOCATION OF VOLUNTEERS' AWARDS PLAQUE NOTED. Manager Rosland advised that the new plaque which lists the past recipients of the Mayor's Commendation Awards has been mounted in the lobby of the main entrance to City Hall. CARPETING TO BE INSTALLED IN CITY HALL. Manager Rosland said that the installation of the new carpeting in City Hall would commence within about a week. ANNUAL TOUR OF THE NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT SCHEDULED. Manager Rosland called the Council's attention to the annual tour of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District on June 9, 1987. He said that any members wishing to attend should let him know so that arrangements could be made. FORMAT FOR MANAGER'S QUARTERLY REPORT PRESENTED. Manager Rosland said he would like to try a new format for presenting his quarterly report. He proposed to talk through his report to the Council via a video tape which could be reviewed by each member of the Council. The report -would then be put into a written format. He said this would provide a more relaxed format to "chat" with the Council on various things that are happening in the City as well as bring them up to date on the challenges given to him by the Council. POSITION OF DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS PROPOSED. Following the resignation of John Brady, media specialist, Manager Rosland said he would like to increase the responsibilities of that position to Director of Communications. The job description would include both cable responsibilities and written word. He said his goal is to reach the Edina public 12 months of the year through several publications: 1) The Highlander (published four times a year), 2) Future News (official publication of Edinborough Park), 3) Park and Recreation Calendar (to be published two times year), and 4) Manager's Newsletter (published two times a year). He said he felt that by using a variety of publications we would reach most of the Edina residents. Mr. Rosland said he is also considering training of staff and particularly parttime employees by means of video tapes and that this also would be a part of the proposed position. In order to get some permanence with this position he would suggest a salary increase and that most of the funding would come from cable funds. He said the position would be advertised with the salary.left open to get feedback on what we would have to pay and that he would come back to the Council for approval. RESIDENT'S CONCERN REGARDING CROWS NOTED. Manager Rosland said that Member Richards had sent him a note that he had received a complaint from a resident regarding the noise caused by crows and asked what could be done to eradicate them. There was no discussion of the subject. SEMINAR ON ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland said that Lois Moffit of the Community Resources Board had talked to him about having John Carver conduct a seminar on "Organizational Effectiveness" through better boards. They asked if the Council would be interested and that the proposed date is October 29. He said the School Board and the Community Education Center Board is interested. Mr. Rosland said that Mr. Carver is reputed to be a effective presenter. It was informally agreed to support the proposal. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 6/1/87: General Fund $331,294.14, Art Center $5,922.64, Capital Fund $6,996.40, Swimming Pool Fund $5,477.65, Golf Course Fund $16,992.83, Recreation Center Fund $939.56, Gun Range Fund $1,149.17, Utility Fund $238,288.10, Liquor Dispensary Fund $5,912.23, Construction Fund $5,419.45, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $300.00, Total $618,692.17. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m. City Clerk ITEM III. B. M E M O R A N D U M T0: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: P- 87 -4,. Regis Corporation DATE: June 11, 1987 You will recall that the subject proposal was continued by the City Council to allow the opportunity for neighboring property owners to comment on the proposal. The continuance also allowed time to publish and notify for the proposed vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue. The proposal remains the same as presented at the May 18, 1987 meeting. Discussions have taken place between Regis and representatives of the Pantry Restaurant and the Eden 100 building. CONSENT ITEM III.C. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Final Development Plan - Edina Theater DATE: June 10, 1987 The owners of the Edina Theater have requested that the public hearing on their redevelopment proposal be continued to the Council's July 6, 1987, meeting. Peter Kofman, the theater's representative, will not be available for the scheduled June 15, meeting. Since staff was aware of this request, we did not mail notices for the June 15 meeting. We will mail for the July 6, meeting. Staff has notified the 50th and France Merchants of the change in hearing dates. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON MAY 27, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, John Bailey, Del Johnson, Helen McClelland, Jane Paulus, Virginia Shaw , David Runyan , John Palmer, and Lee Johnson STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Mr. Del Johnson moved for approval of the May 1, 1987 Community Development and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Mr. Bailey seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. III. NEW BUSINESS C -87 -3 Normandale Lutheran Church ` 6100 Normandale Road Request: Building Addition to Classroom Wing and Reconstruction of Office Wing �\ Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Normandale Lutheran Church has submitted plans in support of their request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a building expansion. The expansion would add one floor to the educational wing on the south side. The expansion would also include the demolition of and reconstruction of the northerly office wing. Mr. Larsen pointed out the reconstructed northerly wing would provide office space on the upper floor and youth activity and nursery space on the lower floor. The northerly addition also contains a new narthex for the church. The addition to the educational wing would only be partially finished. About one third of the space would be finished for choir rehearsal and a music library. The remainder of the space would be reserved for future needs. The proposed additions will result in a net increase of 16,376 square feet of building area. Mr. Larsen pointed out the Zoning Ordinance requires that churches maintain a 50 foot setback from all property lines. The westerly portion of the existing north wing provides a setback of approximately 27 feet. The new wing would increase to 44 feet the setback at this same point. The rest of the main building would provide the required 50 foot setback. However, exterior stairwells in two locations on the north wall provide 33 and 47 foot setbacks. Consequently, a 17 foot setback variance is requested. Using 22-inches per seat, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, the church has a capacity of 515 persons. At one parking space for-each 3 seats, 172 parking spaces are required. Currently there are 216 parking spaces on -site. Following construction on -site parking will be reduced to 194 spaces. Information provided by the church indicates an average combined attendance of 640 persons. the largest single service attendance is 400 persons. This results in.a parking demand of 133 spaces. Continuing Mr. Larsen said surface parking areas are not screened from the. street as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has been assured that screening will be provided. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed addition and reconstruction will improve the aesthetic appeal of the building, especially the new north wing. Additional landscaping and screening the parking areas will improve the overall appearance of the site. The activities planned for this space are not likely to conflict with Sunday mornings services when parking demand is the highest. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule which conforms to Ordinance requirements. Ms. June Schmidt, Lloyd Berquist, Don Dahlquist and Verna Lindquist were present representing the proponent. Mr. Berquist briefed the Commission on the proposal pointing out it will be a significant improvement for the church. He said the materials used would match the present structure's materials. Mr. Runyan asked Mr. Berquist which phase of the project would be constructed first. Mr. Berquist said the addition of a 3rd floor to the south wing would be constructed first and as monies became available completion of the project would continue. Continuing Mr. Berquist informed the Commission the church held a neighborhood meeting which informed impacted neighbors of the proposed plans. He added neighborhood comment was generally favorable. Mr. Dahlquist told the Commission the church will work with City staff to complete a landscaping plan which will meet their requirements. Mr. Del Johnson moved to recommend approval. Mr. Palmer seconded the motion. Mr. Gordon Johnson and Mr. Lee Johnson abstained. Mr. Runyan, Mrs. Paulus, Mrs. McClelland, Mr. Bailey and Mrs. Shaw voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT C -87 -3 General Location: Request: MAY 27, 1987 Normandale Lutheran Church 6100 Normandale Road West of highway 100 and south of Valley view Road- Building Addition to Classroom Wing and Reconstruction of Office Wing Normandale Lutheran Church has submitted plans in support of their request for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a building expansion. The expansion would add one floor to the educational wing on the south side. The expansion would also include the demolition of and reconstruction of the northerly office wing. The reconstructed northerly wing would provide office space on the upper floor and youth activity and nursery space on the lower floor. The northerly addition also contains a new narthex for the church. The addition to the educational wing would only be partially finished. About one third of the space would be finished for choir rehearsal and a music library. The remainder of the space would be reserved for future needs. The proposed additions will result in a net increase of 16,376 square feet of building area. The Zoning Ordinance requires that churches maintain a 50 foot setback from all property lines. The westerly portion of the existing north wing provides a setback of approximately 27 feet. The new wing would increase to 44 feet the setback at this same point. The rest of the main building would provide the required 50 foot setback. However, exterior stairwells in two locations on the north wall provide 33 and 47 foot setbacks. Consequently, a 17 foot setback variance is requested. Using 22 inches per seat, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, the church has a capacity of 515 persons. At one parking space for each 3 seats, 172 parking spaces are required. Currently there are 216 parking spaces on -site. Following construction on -site parking will be reduced to.194 spaces. Information provided by the church indicates an average combined attendance of 640 persons. the largest single service attendance is 400 persons. This .results in a parking demand of 133 spaces. Surface parking areas are not screened from the street as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Staff has been assured that screening will be provided. At this writing a specific plan for this screening has not been provided. Recommendation The proposed addition and reconstruction will improve the aesthetic appeal of the building, especially the new north wing. Additional landscaping and screening the parking areas will improve the overall appearance of the site. The activities planned for this space are not likely to conflict with Sunday mornings services when parking demand is the highest. Staff recommends approval with the following conditions: 1. Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule which conforms to Ordinance requirements. NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EDINA 6100 Normandale Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 Telephone: 929 -1697 Senior Pastor: The Rev. Dr. Richard I. Preis Associate Pastor: The Rev. Robert J. Rusert Intern Pastor: John L. Strommen May 18, 1987 Mr. C . Larsen, CITY OF EDINA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55436 Dear Craig, In response to your request, we are pleased to provide the following information: The membership of NORMANDALE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EDINA is; children (ages approx. 4 wks. to age 10) 292; confirmed membership ( ages 10 and up) 1,648, totalling 1940 members. We currently conduct two Sunday morning worship services with an average attendance of 640 people. Our Sunday services are held at 8:30 to 9:30AM and 11:00 to 12:00 Noon. We conduct a Sunday Adult Seminar, A Senior High School Seminar, a Junior High School Seminar, and Sunday Church School between worship services at 9:45 to 10:30AM. Concurrent with our 11:OOAM worship service, we conduct a second Sunday Church School for children ages 3, 4, and 5 years old. During the week, we have a Nursery School, which is held on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. Two sessions are held, one morning session from 9:15AM to 11:30AM, and an afternoon session held at 12:45AM to 3:OOPM. The student enrollment is held at 50 students for each session. Our music expansion needs will support our current nine and future choir needs. The choirs are: The Normandale Choir (college and up) The High School Choir (Jr. & Sr. High) The Confirmation Choir (Confirmation age) The Boys Choir (ages 8 to 12) The Girls Choir (ages 8 to 12) The Cherubs ( ages 5 to 8) The Normandale Bell Choir (college and up) The Normandale Orchestra (High School and up) NORMANDALE also serves as the precerict seven polling place; we hold Boy Scout troop meetings and we repeatedly hold Girl Scout recruiting events. Each Monday evening BSF (Bible Study Fellowship) is held at NORMANDALE. Church Administrator: Robert W. Anderson Minister of Music: David Clarke Directors of Educational Ministries: Marlin Hidy, Barbara Peterson Director of Nursery School: Deborah Houghton Page two NORMANDALE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EDINA May 18, 1987 Our focus and Lutheran tradition is to be programatic throughout the year, not only on Sunday mornings. We believe this addresses the congregations and communities needs. Our planned refurbishing and youth expansion is to provide the congregation and the community a facility able to address our educational and recreational needs. The expansion of the music area i's a refinement, the expansion to three floors for our Sunday Church School classrooms is to meet the needs of our Sunday Church School, the expansion of our youth facility is to.address the youth needs, specifically going from one to three youth meeting rooms. The youth multi - purpose room.will.also be functional for serving evening dinners for our single, couples,and neighborhood groups, along with the congregation as a whole. Additionally, the multi - purpose room will be able to hold sports /arobic /bible study activities for all ages. Our current nursery is at capacity, 30 infants. Its enlargement and relocation to the main entrance, will make it more accessible and functional. The new combination Chapel /Lounge area (seating 100) will address the needs of smaller weddings,.smaller receptions, smaller funerals, smaller midweek youth worship services. Our beautiful, large sanctuary can be intimidating to some planning these previously mentioned events. Since our congregation administration information is now on computer, we feel our new process -flow office is productivity designed, and visionary to meet our future needs. Our congregation volunteer network of approximately 60 hours weekly meets our administration needs. The neighbors of NORMANDALE who attended our neighborhood construction announcement meeting, were very favorable. One specific comment made was, "my property value will increase because I'll have a better highway 100 sound barrier." The congregation is pleased our planned refurbishing can provide and address our needs. We are especially pleased our youth needs require expansion! Craig we are pleased to learn we have been good neighbors. We are also pleased to continue being programatic for our congregation all during the week with a unique and fairly complete facility and staff. If you have any questions, please call. S' cer y, Donald B. Dahlquist Chairman, Building Planning ommittee Tel: 944- 8187/929 -1697 L I U,,-1 F A I I C- k I 0401 1.VMHVi H 19 1 V -L qr ':.. ...., Inc;, ��Y «��,•�•'_ ' ' ,• '`r ;��ry _ Via. +_ �. 1 qr` .. ��.{�. D �� ° °` v e � � � ot 4. It ora ,'r i + Sr 'gl 6 ^�' l,. - ..V. I'% ♦±�wl•{w-ye 11." � �I' 7 �� �� PCO.W. LJN rR ry\V 611' Ya *,Yf Sf 'M + r lS! SPnceJ \ A CHURCM I IM T• �m � +:'i'i_ .•� {G' ..�rCyF/ - \ \> .�Y•- ";IYSb7fw -��► Iu �': _+,'Jr• .}�'j•'•,'�; n r�'•' i - 4 . 1 ICLL+ ..�- +5`.,'.. .T. pt, • e� :- 1• .• � u Deacriotlon, \A 1 �-'rrP .`.. ;,."1 _`k'•: 1 R? d+ r.•,- Y;•.. ' -V' �t.1 . �` ..may- S I Let 1, Block 1, Normandale Lutheran Church Add. ty{yt {'• '7' '.'. ��•� 1 l' + "' Except that part taken for hlgh"y purpose + deacd s _ d ` °•�; ab.'!� ( _J ' � i'' •` ~,k� I 1 T �� N as fo l love Beginning at a point on the north line of Block 1, •. `� ��t�i `e -y •Irt�`'r _j »' r'w+ - v Kesler 11 it fddltlonldietant 115 feet easterly - y�� :?t�"r•+ = - • • �t, <'�'• '� A f • of the none hvest corner thereof: thence run north- k -, ,'� } ;{N; C , , • .� t`a'i I easterly to a point distant 130 feet westerly •• �••,Ot - {'. r �a Xi ~.i (nwesured et right angles) o[ a point on the cost �;u1 �• - - 1 ,P 11na of Section 33, Tovnsh,p ll7 North, Range 21 Mast, Al sennt ]60 feet north a[ the south -ast comer + r. thereof: thence run northeasterly to a point distant •'� a -) S ( {IT - arrLt=-- +• _� — S• l0� feet westerly (measure et right angles) of a point - }�.• 0 !' G ^'�• +!l 1. .,� nt ,; ,',�.' _ on the east 11 ne of ealA Seet Lon 33 distant, •15 fees �r� I'..:' °�•• ! •. j'•••' •fl north of the a'+utheeet corner thereof, thence run north- ant kn d y �" ��'�.'�•F �''!'['.•,rIr "' v erl to a distant •cam +y .. 'e i; .: +.•, '� °.- c'.'', .'. •.S ' y poant 90 feet westerly (measured �■ c }, r : at rlqht angles) of a pnlnt on the east line of said 7 }� I r.•;',�th L' -'n'ir f I'�•'1 +•'(!,ti .'r V_./ 1 Sect ten 33 distant 7 45 feet north of the southeast I `(;�t'�r r J' -'' 7 f' :a•i''•: .I''r, .,, Mi,]M,tV,r1�L1V I I 1 earner thereof •nd ther- ter-Inatlnq. '.J, •/• ,� a �. . _ + -,• O ,M'-J s2I ,� I ,.rr.•.., •'A.r •Y _•• -. Gam' , �'{ r J •�. ,� i.I � �1 �. I I I r�Na, c".O pa hh_ -"'mss A., 6• .: .:, ::; .",L':'. ..4.I''S :. I q9 , LQr I Bl -Y c I. �1Ctz&v,-.T-&Lr- Luz)-( =ct>+v 6,u, Vi Pdd. - Cr- 1zTiff 14�r— ,T Or 5E�VEY - U -- Norrv+andal� Lu�1 e-ar+ C4+urc�+ S• If 0�_S -S W. C!A RT1A T7 y�T r try .I24C . t'.' /f ARKIN.4.— SPACES o ob ' l t ■ t >< t t t ! y 0 t t - MH flrlq I1ra1 Flr•, 1•a• I/Mrl• el•wvta, Illq I•w• fit 141-1130 536[/7 N /aavla•oe+a o-•.+r+ ,a Z O i S OAG t 5 ,y 21 h TOTAL 3.3 VA, dec. JZ , I r ' I %%%F, 10 Wm MaiawTs Rernode!;ng ooh . I = r, F�=,, C ��V; I © lziE [ C'r,-r.fq 0? 0'.,- Addit;on & BVVBR ARCHRECTS = r, F�=,, C ��V; I © lziE [ uppat "VE No H II,: .; II M, m- I MCI BALCONY LEVEL PLAN BWBR ARCHRECTS a I C,;: i c NEW UPPER LEVEL CLASSROOM ADDITION . mmmm 9aL 9,Aa PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION - NORTH ADDITION a -- 1/3 ❑0 NORTH ELEVATION BWBR AROirrECTS N 01, ED7..!. Add;li�n �D'v L F T:r-rr'%' C.T. Rerroda"n- DC y PARTIAL ELEVATION — CLASSROOM WING � or+ ..e.a YIDn U'4 6 M►. 01.011'4 MS4 �L D .U1 -f IOU UI� WS90M1 i PARTIAL ELEVATION — NORTH ADDITION , /r.1•.0 lump ... emu, nl�r ...,,..�,...,.,...,., ❑ r• 111�1•F '"^ r �.: � - uri lti,::r:�'; �.:rt'. � P' E2;.! . Addition A 5025 Valley View Road Edina, Minnesota 55436 June 9, 1987 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Sirs;. Regarding the case file C -87 -3, Normandale Lutheran Church expansion of present building, I wish to express my view of the situation. I live at 5025 Valley View Road, which is located on the southwest corner of Valley View Road and Wilryan Street. Since the last expansion of the facilities of the church, I have observed increased parking and traffic problems in the area. Monday night programs throughout part of the year causes spill -out parking from their lot on to the streets near by. At times, the rush to meet time requirements causes speeding, backing into and from local driveways and narrow street passages which is a traffic hazard in a residential area. In addition, since there are no sidewalks in this area, the attendees walk over neighboring yards. For those walking in the street, I have observed some problems between pedestrian and autos with pedestrian forced to step from street, again a traffic hazard. It is my opinion, that this expansion should be restricted unless adequate parking is added to handle the expansion of the southern wing. Secondly, this is a nice residential area, and the addition of another level to the southern wing will present a two story building more in appearance of an office building than residential. Therefore, I am protesting the expansion of the southern wing with a second floor construction. Sincerely, L. B. Slee IV.A. M E M 0 R A N U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer SUBJECT: Vacation of portion of Arcadia Avenue DATE: June 10, 1987 The City Council will be hearing the request for vacation of Arcadia Avenue between Vernon Avenue and the public roadway that runs along the north.side of the bowling alley on Monday,.June 15, 1987. Attached are three items that relate to the issue. The first is the issue Area 4 discussion that appears in the Grandview Traffic Study. The second is a letter from the County Traffic Engineer indicating a county project for reconstruction of Interlachen and Vernon Traffic Signal. The third is a map indicating locations that were counted for traffic volumes in the area under consideration. After reviewing all three, items listed above, the Engineering Staff believes that the traffic objective to improve flow and capacity can be achieved. Using those documents as a background, we would recommend that a vacation of a portion of Arcadia would be appropriate and that the developer of the Regis project conduct necessary geometric changes to improve traffic flow past the bowling alley. Additionally, the staff recommends retaining utility easement rights over the proposed vacated area. FJH:lmb Issue Area 4: Issue Area 4 is the area in the vicinity of the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue. (See Figure 20.) This area was selected for study due to the possible redevelopment of the area and the request by the devel- oper for vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue. The resulting design study focused on providing better access to the area and a larger contiguous area for redevelopment. The proposed roadway modification (Figure 21) .basic- ally consists of realigning the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue so that it intersects Vernon Avenue opposite Interlachen Boulevard. This proposal has the following advantages: • Eliminates an intersection along Vernon Avenue. • Provides a greater separation between conflict points along Vernon Avenue. • Makes better use of the fourth leg of a major signal- ized intersection. • Provides a better design on the south leg of the intersection at Vernon Avenue. • Provides complete access instead of only partial access at the northern terminus of Arcadia Avenue. • Allows the northerly 200 feet of Arcadia Avenue to be vacated, which results in a parcel with almost 400 feet of frontage along Vernon Avenue. 44 The proposed design at the new intersection of realigned Arcadia Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard includes a narrow median, approximately 75 feet long. The purpose of this median is to mitigate the current traffic opera- tional problems associated with the close spacing be- tween Vernon Avenue and the entrance to the shopping area. This median will still provide unlimited access for vehicles coming from both Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard but will restrict the access out to right turns only. As a result, most exiting vehicles will be forced to use the existing driveway behind the building which currently contains the City's liquor store. This will require many motorists to change their driving habits but it will also provide these motorists with a significantly better approach to the intersection at Vernon Avenue. No further alternative designs were investigated since the proposed modification accomplishes the objectives and no major disadvantages were identified. 47 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av. South HENNEPIN Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 LFU 935 -3381 TTY 935 -6433 June 3, 1987 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: CSAH 20 at CSAH 158 Traffic Signal Revision Dear Fran: . As recently discussed, we will be including in our 1988 Capital Improvement Program complete revision of the traffic signal at CSAH 158 and CSAH 20 (Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard). This revision will take into account possible future improvements on Vernon Avenue through and east of the intersection. As it appears at this point, the entire cost of signal revision will be borne by the county. Observations of operations at this intersection have shown that turning left from the right lane from Interlachen onto eastbound Vernon does not appear to present a problem. During the morning peak observation, only two vehicles were noted to have made this maneuver. Neither move, although illegal, seemed to present a traffic problem. During the observation periods, the intersection would generally clear every cycle with all left turning Interlachen traffic that arrived at the signal on a red indication able to clear the intersection on the succeeding green. Unless you or the Police Department feel strongly that some action is necessary, we plan a status quo concerning this traffic movement. Should you care to discuss the matter further, please call me at 935 -3381. Sincerely, Dennis L. Hansen, P.E. County Traffic Engineer DLH:mr c: Herb Klossner Ted Hoffman Pat Murphy HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer o .-6 5 4 3 v Area proposed to �fp G Y Z I 1 be vacated ° „�> O ,` !� °1 1 50 /) r 8 T9 10 i2 i 13 C" •. 10 ' 1 I I .Y,i�Q /• e8 C j� Average Daily Traffic 32 fs�' - ��d' ,s _ _ -= a, se -- , '_'I _` _• J W.1 /4 Cor Location 1. 2385 ; ss.31c , �L - 43 -5,�s Zs _ - rez o r` s• Location 2: 786 11. s r.• T• ar. 13S r Location 3: 2607 ; 30 ; _ i . a•_ i`:; ` ... . Location 4: 2763 1 4 3 z 1 W � ,. O1� 2 . ' _ • _ 1 A__ _ r ' I .. J 5 21.4' 6 7 10 Ir 'v Ld 7�a �gti5� "* a g 51 1 S N v 13 O 5 - I z 60 6 „�� D t._ - 1--- - - - - -- m: R.L. N0. 6-- 1 1 D L See Record PI°r o S° ,n 7 So {� ,39.IP -� O Nf0 0!!OL 8 ° ° 21 O ` 140 -.4° - �/ •s WEST v � S i t z •. -- - _-A.7-2 20. 24 p:7o`IS'35.. _ I < L 193.94 fo,r� a 1393 19 23 = ^ 140 - - -- - -..__ WEST 3 7` n g 7 O 18 3 1901 ?x'67 11rY r gr� t, .•� I S¢ I _~ TYJOF 5 1', ; f*1 21 8 iC 17 4 C f° 7, �` I a 1 e So' 1' Z' ' N of -- Imo,. , B c-- N So a 16 5 s m 7 4 oo.Q 1�I" i o �tyOPG�'1 10 16 6 9 !n i G /sSa /' C� 1�0 -58- 137.4 F ... -- - • .i 9 - -21 17 18 fl D 14 — 7 �. _ yq.0 6 .••1 2 I �1 - - - --- 17 , 12 10 - 18 rn 13 8 `4q�i9a r .. • cP ,� \ o Q t �p�� \h II��S bo -- -'�-- -- 19 18 13 - \8 �� v �� 12 9 - -- V s,e • 11 j 15 0 0 20 c o $ 14 s'O 60 °'_ 11 0 o i._ rj1 v r33 e6 (6 20) ��� r 1 i AA)) a O �. •! 64•x4'• 1 '.�i 28 all ° s •F _ Ea.� I (; I i 0 r'• 107.58 B..�C'ss °o '� `r '8n t -bb IS 69. Z7 ov s /[ •.1 i l V.A.1. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members - FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: ORDINANCE 461222 - PARK ORDINANCE DATE: June 11, 1987 Attached is Ordinance 461222 which is our Park Ordinance. This addition simply is one that we strongly feel is needed for Edinborough Park to make sure that we have some teeth in the way we operate, maintain and program the Park. Hopefully, if you agree, we could give it first and second reading. KR /sw Attachment 7629h(31D):TSE:060587 ORDINANCE NO 1222 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO DEFINE AND REGULATE USE OF PROGRAMMED PARKS The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. Sec. 17 of Ordinance No. 1222 is renumbered Sec. 18- and a new Sec. 17 is added to Ordinance No. 1222 as follows: Sec. 17. Programmed Parks. (a) Definition. A programmed park shall mean any enclosed public park in which activities are programmed or scheduled by, or under the :supervision of, the Director of Parks, or his representative. This includes but is not limited to Edinborough Park. (b) Administration. (i) The Director of Parks, or his representative, may close all or portions of the park to public use, or restrict all or portions of the park to public access, to, accommodate programmed or scheduled activities. The Director of Parks, or his representative, may adopt rules and regulations for the use and operation of a programmed park consistent with this ordinance, and other applicable ordinances of the City. (c) Prohibited Acts. In a programmed park no person shall: (i) Act in a manner that is disruptive or distracting to programmed or scheduled activities. (ii) Use the park or any equipment therein in a manner inconsistent with the programmed or scheduled activities. (iii) Physically obstruct free passage on walkways and paths within the park. (iv) Run or move rapidly along walkways or pathways within the park in a manner that would interfere with sedentary use of the park or would be disruptive or dangerous to pedestrian traffic within the park. (v) Be or remain within the park before or after posted hours of operation without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. (vi) Be or remain within any area of the park closed to public use without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. 7629h(31D):TSE:060587 (vii) Walk, run, climb, sit, stand or be physically present in any area designed for or planted with vegetation, or be in any water area or other area not designed for human activity. (viii) Use any electric sound receiving, transmission or reproducing device in such a manner as to annoy or disturb persons within.the park, or disturb or interfere with programmed or scheduled activities. (ix) Use or consume alcoholic beverages contrary to any ordinance of the City or contrary to any rules and regulations related thereto, or contrary to any license or lease by which the user or consumer is within the park. (x) Use or consume alcoholic beverages not dispensed by a person or group duly licensed by the City to use the park. (xi) Use tobacco in any form. (xii) Operate skateboards, roller skates, bicycles, scooters, or similar vehicles or devices, unless part of a programmed or scheduled activity. (xiii) Act disorderly, as defined by Ordinance No. 1001. (xiv) Trespass, as defined by Ordinance No. 1001. Sec. 2. This ordinance, shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in on Attest: City Clerk Mayor REQUEST FOR PURCHASE VII.A. Consent Agenda TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 9, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Contract boulevard tree removal Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Tim's Tree Service ($10 x 950 in.) $ 9,500 5612 Corvallis Avenue North Crystal, MN 55429 2. Arp's Tree Service ($10 x 950 in.) $ 9,500 - 17845 Ward Lake Drive Anoka, MN 55304 (Asplundh Tree Service and Tri State Tree Service were both too busy to quote on work at this time.) Department Recommendation: Tim's Tree Service $ 9,500 Finance Director's Endorsement: Signat 5e Department The recommended bi is is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director Cit� anager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the De artmen and r P o end Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: % e nenm to Ros`ranj, City Manager REOUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 10, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): 2 Falls Model T.A.H.9 Snow Plow Wings VII.B. Consent Agenda Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. LaHass Manufacturing & Sales, Inc. $6,792.00 2. Little Falls Machine, Inc. $7,010.00 3. Department Recommendation: LAHass Manufacturing & Sales, Inc. $6,792.00 9 Public Works Signs re Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi t9s is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City M ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Cou it approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: / ��^ Kenneth , Rosland, 'City/Manager r�. VII. C. M E M O R A N D UM TO: Ken Rosland FROM: Ceil Smith SUBJECT: INSURANCE QUOTATIONS DATE: June 12, 1987 Attached please find an analysis of the quotations that we received for renewal of the following insurance coverages: - General liability - Workers compensation - Auto liability - Liquor liability - Mobile equipment coverage - Monies and securities coverage - Property insurance - Malpractice insurance for our paramedics Please note that we are using only two bids for property insurance, those being The Hartford and the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. The fact is, we asked for more quotations than just these two, from the Chubb Insurance Company, CNA and-Great America. At the time of seeking these quotations, we indicated to these companies that in order to be competitive, their premium quotations would have to be below $60,000. They responded by indicating that they could not make such premium quotations. A further note about the property insurance quotation from The Hartford is that it's also higher that the quotation of last year. We have seen a reduction in the rate per hundred dollars of coverage of some 20 %. The increase in premium is due to the addition of approximately $8,000,000 worth of property value which is primarily due to Edinborough Park. At our City Council Meeting on Monday, June 15, 1987, the insurance agents who assisted us in receiving these quotations will be present to answer any or all questions that the Council may have at that time. At the present time, it would appear that we will be recommending that we make the awards to The Hartford Insurance Company and the Home Insurance Company for the coverage that I have previously mentioned. Should you have any questions, please contact me. CS /sw Attachment CITY OF EDINA 5 Insurance Quotations June 1987 1. HARTFORD - Property TRANSCONTINENTAL -- Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit PENCO - General Liability $ 600,000 Limit Automobile $ 600,000 Limit LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Premium does not vary with losses; except workers compensation 2. HARTFORD - Property TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit NATIONAL UNION - General Liability - $ 600,000 Limit Automobile $ 600,000 Limit LEAGUE Workers Compensation Premium does not vary with losses; except workers compensation General Liability on Claims Made Form PREMIUMS $ 56,990:00 53,133.00 198,665.00 95,862.00 (No Comp. or Collision) Between $ 80,692. and 310,111. Premium = 80,692 + (Losses x 1.1( 56,990.00 53,133.00 178,396.00 118,236.00 (No Comp. or Collision) Between $ 80,692. and 310,111. CIT - EDINA PREMIUMS 3. HARTFORD - Property $ 56;990.00 HOME INSURANCE - General Liability, including Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit 142,455.00 Automobile $ 500,000 Limit 61,873.00 (Includes $ 10,0 Charge for Comp and Collision,- Fire Trucks) HOME INSURANCE - Workers Compensation 279,560.00 Present Plan - Premium varies with losses on all lines except property 4. LEAGUE - Property 59,575.00 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit 53,133.00 LEAGUE - General Liability - $ 600,000 Limit 99,380.00 Automobile $ 600,000 Limit 20,016.00 (No Comp. and Collision) LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between $ 80,692. and 310,111. $ 10,000. Deductible Property; $ 25,000. Deductible G.L. & Auto (Including Defense Costs) subject to annual maximum deductible of $ 125,000. - G.L. is on Claims Made Form (34,385. cost to purchase extended reporting endorsement) CITY f OINA 5. HARTFORD - Property; General Liability; Liquor; Automobile LEAGUE - Workers Compensation City to pay all claims up to $ 50,000. Any One Occurrence; subject to an annual maximum of $ 210,000. Plan has the advantage of the City holding money until Auto and G.L. claims are actually paid. Also, City determines if payment should be made or claim should be litigated. G.L. on claims made form. ($ 172,000. cost to purchase extended reporting endorsement) PREMIUMS $ 231,150.00 Between $ 80,692. and 310,111. ANNUAL COST AT LOSSES AS OF 6/9/87 312,796 Auto /GL Work Comp 82/83 65,629 24,078 83/84 39,945 130,558 84/85 52,503 36,086 85/86 57,334 272,128 86/87 24,586 53,811 ANNUAL COST AT VARIOUS LOSS LEVELS 312,796 311,842 1 2 3 4 5 512,428 514,533 327,532 404,911 403,957 +Defense 628,956 631,061 428,482 496;355 495,401 +Defense 525,037 527,142 326,135 404,994 404,040 +Defense 714,761 716,866 627,092 599,549 593,595 +Defense 544,534 546,639 313,402 396,574 395,620 +Defense - MINIMUM 485,342 487,447 215,449 312,796 311,842 MAXIMUM 714,761 716,866 659,409 667,215 751,261 PAY IN 635,198 637,303 5401878 462,652 461,698 Expiring Program - 86/87 CITY OF EDINA Proposed - 87/88 W.C. $ 315,676. (.81 Exp. Mod.) .Cov. A - Statutory Cov. B - '100/500/100 G.L. $ 156,797. Annual Premium ( $ 105,925. Subj.; $ 50,872. Non - Subj.) $ 14.779. Composite Rate Per $ 1,000. Operating Expend- itures $ 500,000 CSL Limits A.L. $ 77,800. Annual Premium ( $ 58,661. Subj.; $ 1.9,139. Non - Subj.) $ 500,000 CSL Limits 149 Total Units A.P.D. Specified Perils $ 250. Deductible Collision $ 4,634. Annual Premium 149 Total Units (484,896) + $ 70,011 W.C. $ 279,560 (.81 Exp. Mod.) Cov. A - Statutory Cov. B - 100/500/100 G.L. $ 142,455 Annual Premium ( $ 95,594. Subj.; $ 46,861. Non -Subj. $ 12.717. Composite Rate Per $ 1,000. Operating Expend- - itures $ 500,000 CSL Limits A.L. $ 51,873. Annual Premium ( $38,172. Subj.; $ 13,701. Non- Subj.) $ 500,000 CSL Limits 142 Total Units A.P.D. Specified Perils - All Units Collision Deductible Varies 7 Units $ 10,000. Annual Premium Basic .233 .211 L.C.F. 1.140 1.14 Tax 1.081 1.096 Standard $ 484,896 $ 423,326 Non - Subject 70,011 60,562 Maximum 1.25 1.28 Minimum Basic x Tax + N.S. Basic x Tax + N.S. Loss Limits $ 160,000 W.C. $ 170,000 W.C. 150,000 G.L. /A.L. 150,000 G.L. /A.L. RETRO PREMIUM = [BASIC + (Losses x 1.14)] x 1.096 = + $ 60,562. VII. C. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland SUBJECT: RISK REDUCTION DATE: June 12, 1987 In preparation of the presentation of bids for our insurance renewal, I wanted to provide you with some background information concerning the City's Risk Reduction Program. The following information will hopefully provide you with some general background that will be helpful in your consideration of this matter. History of the Risk Reduction Program The City, over the years, has always had some form of Risk Reduction Program. In the past, it has taken on various forms and operated under numerous titles. In recent times, such activities were usually referred to as safety programs; today, we call them -Risk Reduction Programs. No matter what we have called them, the major goals of this type of program have remained the same: 1) Identify and evaluate hazards or risks 2) Safety and loss control 3) Claims control 4) Maintain a sound insurance program.. Present Philosophy The City is currently operating under the philosophy and belief that reduction of risks should result directly in reduction of our insurance costs and also result in a more productive work force. Further, the City believes that Risk Reduction is part of a Department Manager's responsibility and should be handled in that manner rather than setting up a system that goes outside the regular management structure. Present Policy (See Attachment A) The document that you find attached is what the City is currently following as policy in the area of Risk Reduction. This policy was developed with the input of Department Heads from Police, Fire, Public Works, Park and Recreation and Administration. (These are our most labor intensive departments.) Although discussion and research in the preparation of this document showed that even without a formalized approach to risk management, the City had a very low loss experience. In spite of that fact, it was felt that development and implemen- tation of a Risk Reduction policy could improve overall City operations. Risk Reduction Committee An outgrowth of the development of the Risk Reduction policy has been the formation of a Committee that meets on an as- needed basis to review losses, r June 12, 1987 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Two discuss various programs and issues. (i.e. items typically reviewed and acted upon - see. Attachments B, C, D, E, F, G & H) The Committee is made up of the Department Heads or their designees that were instrumental in the development of the City's existing policy. Specifically, the Committee has been working in 1987 to: 1) Follow up on the OSHA inspection the City had in December of 1986. All items were completely abated by March 1, 1987. 2) Develop an eye injury reduction program, step one being the purchase of safety equipment and then supervisor and employee training. 3) Continue the hearing conversation program. (See Attachment I) 4) Retrain all City employees under the "Right to Know Program." All the material safety data sheets have been updated and distributed. (See Attachment II) 5) Prepare a summer employee orientation program. 6) Review the back injury reduction program and continue to revise as needed. (See Attachment III) Services Provided by the Insurance Company The insurance company provides the City with numerous services. Many of the documents reviewed by the Risk Reduction Committee and information provided to the Administration staff is the result of regular visits of a technical specialist in industrial hygiene. (See Attachment I) This specialized technical assistance helps us identify potential problems . and by addressing them to the best of our ability hopefully prevents major losses. The insurance company further is willing to provide written material that we can use in program development. (See Attachment J, K, L & M as examples) Services Provided by Insurance Agents The City has been fortunate in that agents representing us in the various lines of coverage we carry have been very heipful in maintaining a solid insurance program. The agents have in the past and continue now to serve as excellent resource persons when questions arise. The information received from agents many times is factored into decisions made assessing risk potential. They also have been strong advocates on our behalf with the companies that serve the City. 'Future Directions The program that we have in place will continue to function in much'the same manner as outlined herein, but there will be continued review and revision of our policy as need dictates. Areas for future consideration and review include but are not limited to Disaster Recovery, Smoking, Wellness and other issues as they arise. The materials contained in this report hopefully will give you some idea of how our Risk Reduction Program operates. I am proud of the way our employees r June 12, 1987 Mayor Courtney & Council Members Page Three have responded to our efforts to control loss and reduce risk. The result of this is a record of loss that is rated by our insurance carrier in the top one to two percent range. Should you have any further questions or suggestions regarding this program, please feel free to contact me or Ceil Smith. KR /sw Attachment I QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM What is the Hearing Conservation Program and why are we involved in it? The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has amended Standard No. 1910.95 which addresses noise on the work site. This Amendment requires an employer to implement a hearing conservation, program for employees who are exposed to sound levels at or above 85 decibels for an eight hour period. The purpose of this Hearing Conservation Program is to reduce employee hearing loss on the worksite. Other activities not related to work could affect employees hearing such as loud music, oper- ating power equipment off the job and part -time job noise exposure. How will l know if I'm being exposed to noise at or above 85 decibels? All of the equipment the City operates has been tested for noise levels. The equipment will have a sticker placed on it which states that hearing protection is required and it will also have the noise level written on the sticker. A chart will be available to equate the noise level to the permitted exposure time. What can be done to reduce my exposure to noise? Hearing protection will be available and must be worn by the employee using the equipment. If you are operating equipment which has a noise level of 90 decibels or greater, the hearing protectors are mandatory. If the equipment has a noise level between 85 and 89 decibels, You will be expected to wear hearing protection. If you prefer not to wear the hearing protection in the 85 to 89 decibel range, you will be asked to sign a waiver form. What else can affect my hearing? Age. As one ages, your hearing degenerates. This fact is calculated into the hearing screening test results to compensate for the aging process. Other things such as disease, illness and heredity may affect ones hearing. This may be identified through audiological testing, which is more sophisti- cated than the routine screening tests which have already been performed. What happens next? All employees who operate equipment which produce noise of 85 decibels or higher have been tested for hearing. This hearing test is called a "baseline audiogram ". Each year from this point on, another annual audiogram will be administered to the employee in the Program. The annual audiogram will be used to determine if there has been a shift in the employees hearing threshold. If there is a hearing loss which cannot be accounted for by aging of the employee, another hearing test will be performed. If the hearing loss does not change, the employee will be asked to see an audiologist for a more comprehensive hearing evaluation. Are the records of my hearing tests available to me? Yes, the individual's hearing test record will be placed in your personnel file and is available to you, your representative or your doctor for examination. Another copy of your hearing test record will be on file with the Bloomington Division of Public Health. don't know how loud 85 decibels is, nor 90 decibels. What do these numbers mean to me and what can I compare them with? This graph should help you compare these decibels with every day noise levels which one may encounter. Sound Pressure in Decibels dB(A) Common Sounds 160 Medium Jet Engine 140 Large Propeller Aircraft Air Raid Siren With the decibel scale and A- weighting Riveting and Chipping filter, the variety of sounds encountered in 120 Discotheque everyday life can be measured scientifically, as displayed in the decibel scale at the right. Punch Press 100 Heavy City s Traffic; Subway O �.;.. 80 Busy Office 60 Normal Speech Q 40 Residential =; Neighborhood ��. _ .�4- ;d..�•'Y��°- Y:'�.T,} ,� Whisper +� ,; . ��,:• _ 0 Threshold of Hearing _•e � "•��.F "�•�. i .F31�• -a•, r.•i'. !V.l •� •,r� .�yj�t' f1 '` _ �',�'�,.. .� '�_ ..J,� •+-` ,:Vi=n' �' .�{' ..'. �'. �� { .. II EMPLOYEE RIGHT TO KNOW TRAINING During April 1987, City Employees attended a training session regarding the Minnesota Right to Know Act of 1983. The training session addressed the following issues: 1. Hazard Recognition 2. Material Safety Data Sheet Information 3. Safety Procedures 4. Employees Right to Refuse Work 5. Employee and Employer Responsibilities Under the Act The training session was videotaped for viewing by those employees who were not available at the time of the training session. The videotape will also be used to train new employees and future temporary employees. Additional training will be initiated this year to complement the general training session. The additional training will target specific hazards associated with each work activity applicable. An evaluation was completed by each employee attending the . training session. The results from the evaluation will be used to structure future training sessions and identify specific concerns expressed by the employees. The April training session was attended by 152 employees. The videotape of the session will be.available soon and those employees who did not attend a session will be expected to view the videotape and complete an evaluation. Back Injury Reduction Program III In late fall of 1984, a morning exercise program was implemented in the Public Works Department. This exercise program consists of 15 minutes of stretching exercise designed to improve ones flexibility and warm up the body before the work shift begins.. The program was well received by the employees and has been expanded to include Park Maintenance employees and Fire Department employees. At the beginning of the program each employee was measured for flexibility and after 6 months they were measured again. A 10 to 14 percent. improvement in flexibility has occurred due to the program. G` REVISED May 1, 1987 A RISK REDUCTION PROGRAM Section 1 /Purpose of Program The City of Edina in an effort to maintain the present high quality of services it offers to the community, and provide for the welfare of its employees, revises its Risk Reduction Program as a guideline for all City personnel. The City of Edina strongly believes that "accidents" can be prevented; that they often result from (1) unsafe conditions; and (2) negligent or careless actions. The efforts of this program will be directed at those hazards contri- buting to occupational injuries that can be eliminated and instilling a safety - conscious attitude in the job skills of every employee. Wellness /Fitness . As part of management's ongoing responsibility, safety is an attitude" developed and displayed by all employees on all jobs, whether they be at work or at home. By elimination of on- the -job injuries, and reducing the loss of time and expense associated with occupational injuries, the City of Edina hopes that jointly with its employees it will better serve its community and make a healthier, more rewarding life for all its employees. -1- Section 2 /Responsibilities Safety is an integral part of the organization and overall management. The ultimate success of the Safety Program depends on the cooperative constant and sincere effort of all levels of management and personnel. Towards this end, the following responsibilities must be considered. Employees Shall: - Comply with all federal, state and local safety and health rules and regulations together with the use of common sense and due care in daily activities. - Be responsible for reporting of all personal injuries, traffic and non - traffic accidents occurring within the course of their employment. - Report all machinery, vehicle or equipment in need of maintenance or repair. - Maintain a clean, neat and orderly work place. Good housekeeping reflects on the employee, the persons attitude towards work, and concern for the prevention of injuries and waste. - Assist supervisor or other parties concerned with fulfilling the goals and objectives of occupational safety laws. Employees are responsible for reporting all unsafe conditions and acts to their immediate supervisors. Supervisors and Foremen - Promote positive employee morale and work atmosphere as appropriate. - Detect and correct unsafe working conditions or practices. Any situation that cannot be immediately corrected should be brought to the attention of the department head. -2- - Enforce all safety rules and regulations in a fair and equitable manner. - See that all injuries are properly treated and reported to the personnel office and the department head in a timely manner (48 hours), with recommendations and any corrective action taken. Any additional lost time or later medical treatment should also be reported at this time. - Promote and enforce an effective program of good housekeeping and operational cleanliness. - Adhere to all safety regulations. Department Heads - Hold regular inspections of department to insure that safety requirements are met. - Insure .report of all accidents by supervisors to the personnel office within 48 hours. - Review accident reports and submit intended corrective actions with 10 days and completion within 60 days after approval to the Assistant City Manager. - Communicate desire for all hazard -free environment and an injury -free department record. - Responsible for the safety record of department and personnel as part of overall management of department. Assistant to the City Manager - Be responsible for review of all reports of injury and recommendation for City -wide problems. - Insure accurate records are maintained and reports filed for safety program, insurance and OSHA purposes. - Discuss with City Manager and department heads safety considerations as the need arises. Section 3 /Risk Reduction Regulations Employees of the City of Edina shall be required to comply with the following safety guidelines: - Obey all safety signs, warnings, notices or citations. They have been posted because they define a_potential danger area. - Good housekeeping keeps down injuries. Keep your work area clean, organized and free of scraps and debris. Tools and materials shall be properly stored when not in use. - Keep aisles and passageways clear. Do not stack materials adjacent to exits and aisles. Certain jobs necessitate the need for personal protective clothing and equipment. When performing such jobs, employees shall properly use the pro- tective equipment so required. - Proper safety glasses and /or protective goggles will be worn by all employees operating grinders, chippers, welders, power saws, or any other equipment which poses a hazard to the user's eyes. - Proper hard hats must be worn on all construction jobs which require them, or when the presence of overhead machinery, equipment or materials endangers the safety of the employee, or when due to the nature of the work, the wearing of such gear is felt to be in the best interest of the employee. - All employees working in street right -of -ways or on job sites exposed to vehicular traffic shall wear safety vests or other approved safety identifying attire. In addition, such jobs shall be properly marked with safety cones, signs, or flags, and if necessary, flagpersons. Q42 - All employees using City vehicles equipped with seat belts should wear them whenever the vehicle is in operation. Do not use equipment that you are not qualified to operate. Employees wishing to use unfamiliar equipment should seek permission and instruction from the supervisor responsible for that equipment. - Carbon monoxide can cause headaches, dizziness, nausea and death. Employees operating gasoline - powered equipment inside buildings must use ventilating hoses where ever possible. If they are unavailable, special care must be taken to insure proper ventilation. Possession of a valid Minnesota Motor Vehicle Driver License of the appropriate class is required to operate any City vehicle or other vehicle on City business and you must comply with all local and state motor vehicle laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations when operating City -owned vehicles. -5- Section 4 /Traffic Incidents Any traffic collisions involving a City -owned vehicle, whether used on -duty or off -duty, or a privately -owned vehicle being used to conduct City business must be reported as soon as possible to the police dispatcher of the community within which it occurs. In all cases, the employee shall remain at the scene until the appropriate police arrives. Upon returning to work, the employee shall report the incident to his supervisor, note all personal injuries that may have been sustained, and complete the proper traffic incident and injury forms. M-M Ms. Diane Sherman Personnel Department City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Sherman, Reference is made to: Loss Source Analysis The Home Insurance Company is pleased present this Loss Analy- sis Report. This review of recent loss experience results has been prepared to serve several purposes. Among these are: 1. The establishment of meaningful Workers' Compensation dollar loss and accident frequency trends which hope- fully assist management in setting overal safety ob- jectives. 2. The identification of "target" departments which have shown the major share of losses over the period re- viewed. It is felt that these "target" departments will demand additional management and Home Loss Con- trol Department attention. The loss data contained in this report was obtained from Claim Exhibits, loss control service reports, as well as accident records maintained by yourselves. This report details the policy years of 1983 and 1984. A previous report detailed the policy years of 1982 and 1983 (the first three quarters). The Home Insurance Company trusts this report will be a val- uable tool in aiding the City of- Edina in the establishment of objectives which will direct loss control activities to- wards achieving loss reduction results. If you have any additional questions or comments in regards IMPORTANT NOTICE The Home services described herein are offered to assist insureds in meeting their legal obligation to maintain a safe place to work. The services offered do not claim to find or include every loss potential, code violation or exception to good practice, but relate only to those hazards specific- ally commented on and described in our recommendations or reports. It remains your responsibility H33843 D Ed. 9/81 to remedy any hazardous conditions on your property. P Ms. Diane Sherman .Personnel Department City of Edina May 16, 1985 Page 2 to this report, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, clj�aJoanne Laney 'Technical Specialist- Industrial Hygiene Loss Control Department JL:pjn cc: Mr. Mark Bernhardtson Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Ms. Ceil Smith Assistant City Administrator City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mr. William Homeyer Harris - Homeyer, Inc. Post Office Box 27106 Minneapolis, Minnesota-55427 Minneapolis Loss Control (3) rf r, Y. % X L , Y rtl,.�jt 1 � -TRE HOME I N CZ SURAN COMPANY o i. .0; 911 1'� zy, .... . .. .. .1 j" ` CITY F I N A MY d­ w 4 �'4801 WE ST, 50TH STREET . t.,2 m M -D I NA., NNESOTA 55425 d if 1 j j� as L 0 IS 3 . ......... . .. . .. ....... OUR CE. A JAL . . . . . . . . . . vi.l. ­;v* L r r 91" z* L _ 4mnce e. 1 H The u ail J" 0A r; 'Because it is solely your responsibility to make further inspections and take whatever act on maybe necessary to prevent losses, enforce safety procedures, detect and eliminate hazardous co-nditions,'�' And comply with any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation concerning safety or health, we ,must advise you as, follows : (1.) By conducting inspections and issuing recommendations or reports, the r does dompany, not undertake to render services to You or for your benefit or to any third person or for that person's benefit and does not assume any duty to you or any duty owed by you to any third person vil % (2) Inspections and recommendations are made solely for the purpose of aiding us in i .-,'t5--.determining the insurability of your property and/or activities; they are not intended to, --:` V'detect or to point out hazardous di con itions on your property. Y. There .... may be haza-rd'0`6's con—diton' s'yo"'!n your pr property' which have been either ,.,, :z detected or pointed Out to YOU. You must not rely on the inspection, recommendations... r reports to discover'a'' n' y' hazardous condition S on your property." (4) 'You must not rely on the Company y to rem remedy any hazardous conditi I r,�-� —j", conditions on your property a ;p� l AN 2 —!�s Z5 J" 0A r; 'Because it is solely your responsibility to make further inspections and take whatever act on maybe necessary to prevent losses, enforce safety procedures, detect and eliminate hazardous co-nditions,'�' And comply with any federal, state or local law, rule or regulation concerning safety or health, we ,must advise you as, follows : (1.) By conducting inspections and issuing recommendations or reports, the r does dompany, not undertake to render services to You or for your benefit or to any third person or for that person's benefit and does not assume any duty to you or any duty owed by you to any third person vil % (2) Inspections and recommendations are made solely for the purpose of aiding us in i .-,'t5--.determining the insurability of your property and/or activities; they are not intended to, --:` V'detect or to point out hazardous di con itions on your property. Y. There .... may be haza-rd'0`6's con—diton' s'yo"'!n your pr property' which have been either ,.,, :z detected or pointed Out to YOU. You must not rely on the inspection, recommendations... r reports to discover'a'' n' y' hazardous condition S on your property." (4) 'You must not rely on the Company y to rem remedy any hazardous conditi I r,�-� —j", conditions on your property a ;p� l AN I WORKERS' COMPENSATION LOSS SUMMARY Policy Year •1984 to date (July 1, 1984 to March 31, 1985) Number of Employees: 205 Manhours Worked: 410,000 (estimated) First Aid Cases: 17 Number of Recordable Cases: 23 Number of Lost Time Cases: 15 Number of Lost Time Days: 180 Recordable Case Rate: 11.22 (frequency) National Safety Council Rate: 15.8 Lost Work Day Rate: 87.8 (severity) l National Safety Council Rate: 98.0 Dollar Summary - Policy Year 1984: Total Claims Filed: 52 jl Total Dollars Paid to Date: $19,433.00 Total Dollars Incurred (Reserves): $39,498.00 L LOSS SUMMARY - 1984: Loss Source Number One: The number of back injuries and material handling injuries has been reduced over 50% from 1983. Frequencies continue to occur in the Fire (paramedics) and Police Departments. The costs of these type of injuries was $6,516.00 to date. This accounts for 33% of the total dollars paid in 1984. Loss Source Number Two: Slips and falls increased since 1983. Particular depart- ments affected were City Hall and Public Works. Total number of slips /falls accidents were 13 with the costs for these type of accidents totaling $6,592.00. This accounts for.34% of the total dollars paid in 1984. Loss Source Number Three: Eye injuries totaled 4, a 50% reduction from 1983. They continue to occur in the Public Works Department. Total costs incurred were very low, but again the potential for serious injury exists with this frequency. WORKERS' COMPENSATION LOSS SUMMARY Policy Year 1983 - July 1, 1983 to July 1, 1984 Number of Employees: 205 Manhours Worked: 410,000 (estimated) First Aid Cases: 27 Number of Recordable Cases: 37 Number of Lost Time Cases: 12 Number of Lost Time Days: 165 Recordable Case Rate: 18.05 (frequency) National Safety Council Rate: 16.72 Lost Work Day Rate: 80.49 National Safety Council Rate: 86.0 Dollar Summary - Policy Year 1983: Total Claims Filed: 52 Total Dollars Paid to Date: $14,771.00 Total Dollars Incurred (Reserves): $23,601.00 LOSS SUMMARY - 1983: Loss Source Number One: Lifting /material handling accidents were the most costly and frequent injuries. Fire Department (paramedics), Police Department, and Public Works Department employees accounted for 74% of these injuries. Total dollar costs for these types of injuries is $12,416.00 paid to date. This is 84% of the total dollars paid in the policy year of 1983. Loss Source Number Two: L Eye injuries totaled eight (8) with all occurring in the Public Works Department and Park Maintenance Department. i I L They accounted for only 3% of the costs, however, the po- tential for severity exists with this high frequency. AUTOMOBILE FLEET LOSS SUMMARY Policy Year 1984 to Date (July 1, 1984 to March 31, 1985 Total Claims Filed: 5 Total Costs Incurred: $6,563.00 Department Breakdown: Police Department: 3 Public Works Department: 1 City Hall: 1 Policy Year 1983 (July 1, 1983 to July 1, 1984) Total Claims Filed: 18 Total Costs Incurred: $10,890.00 Department Breakdown: Police Department: 7 Public Works Department: 9 City Hall: 2 LOSS SUMMARY:- Accidents have been reduced by 75 %. Dollar costs have been reduced by 40% since 1983. The trend of backing accidents has been reduced significantly. There were no specific trends noted in the 1984 loss experience. i I i i i PROPERTY AND LIABILITY LOSS SUMMARY Policy Year 1984 to Date Total Claims Filed: 8 Total Costs Paid: $8.00 Total Costs Incurred (Reserves): $3,908.00 Source Summary: Falls on sidewalks /stairs accounted for 38% of the claims. No payments have been made at this time. Policy Year­1983 (July 1, 1983 to July 1, 1984) Total Claims Filed: 28 Total Costs Paid: $15,722.00 Total Costs Incurred (Reserves): $25,762.00 Source Summery of 1983 and 1984: Vandalism claims were made for a total of $463.00 paid. Twenty -two (22) claims were closed, with no payments made. Nine (9) of the claims were a result of slips, falls on sidewalks /stairs. A total of $180.00 is pa.id to date on these claims and $8,950.00 in Reserves. These falls.oc- curred in various areas, parking ramps,.and at the City Hall. r CONCLUSIONS: 1. Back injuries have been significantly reduced in the Public Works Department. Also, the severity of such injuries was reduced. It is believed this is for two (2) reasons. A. A back injury prevention exercise program in the Public Works Department. ' B. A Return to Work program emphasized in 1984. 2. Automobile accidents, backing /plow accidents, in particular, have been significantly reduced. A Defensive Driving Class (D.D.C.) was conducted in the Public Works Department in 1984. 3. Eye injuries, caused by various reasons, are oc- curring to Public Works and Park Maintenance em- ployees. Although they have been reduced in num- ber this past year, they continue to occur. 4. Falls by citizens and city employees have contin- ued to occur at City Hall. Besides the severe Winters causing slippery conditions, it is also felt that the smooth granite stairs at the main entrance continue to be a contributing factor. CONTROL MEASURES: 1. Continuation of the successful and well received exercise program in the Public Works Department. The Police Department should also be included in such a program as what was just begun in the Fire Department. 2. Defensive Driving Classes should continue to be L scheduled on a regular basis with particular em- phasis on snow plow operations. L 3. Due to the high amount of eye injuries that have occurred in the Public Works and Park Maintenance Departments, all of these employees should be supplied and required to wear safety glasses at L all times. 4. Because of the high amount of slips and falls at City Hall, extra emphasis should,be placed on keeping walking surfaces clear of slippery sur- faces. Also, a non -skid surface or grips should be installed on the main steps to City Hall and non -skid rugs on the stair landings inside the building. - - --- -- r- ^ r- r- r--+ 'r..�.0 lam", r rw.+r ►rte1 IM1 1 wr.�.r.l INDUSTRIA CCIDENT SUMMARY Eno ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INJURED! NAME LOCATION WAbWAM City of Edina All departments 0 PERI00 COVERED 7/1/84 4/16/85 ACCIDENT TYPE STRUCK AGAINST STRUCK BY -1 CAUGHT IH, ON ABRADED, CUT OR Ir M FALLS SPRAINS AND TO MISCELLANEOUS ■ PublicWorks eee OR BETWEEN PUNCTURED STRAINS CONTACT A. eeee 4V h V 4ry 4 004 it Ov O ry�W eeeeeee 00l ryl ry� 0ryl ?O� e j 4r�0ry ry= 00 r O O O fy O ry 1, tr �r �° O f ?4 O O O �V all i e■ r DenartmPnr s° r o �, c� �r �� = o �� o t° `? .` ` s 4 6? s� Park & Rec. Eno 0 WAbWAM 0 ■ PublicWorks eee M■■ eee■ eeee eeeeeee e■ ■eeee . MEM��■■■ee■eeeee©eeeee���■ Water . Sewer eee ee■ ■■��� ���� eeeeee■ eee ■ eee■ . - eee ■e■ ■eee ■ee■ ■eeeee■ see ■e■■■ e mom ee■ eee■ ���� �� ©�■■0 ese �■ ■ee .. . _ mom eee ■■eee eeee eeeeeee ■s■ no ■ MEN momeee■■ee�eeeeeeeeee■ ME MEM mom MIN M 0■■ ■e■ M MMEEMMMO mom ■eeee■ on NONNI MEMEMEE 0 0 No ■eeee■ ■e■ MEMEMEEM 0 M 0eeeee�■■■ ee■ MEMMME MMM M 0 Meeeeeeeeee■ eeeeeeeeee�ee�eeeeeeeeeeee ■e■ MEMEME AMENNEN MEMEMEN ■NNEM NO ee�ee■■e�e�eeeee ©■eee ®ee■eeee ., �. VEHICULAR ACCIDENT SUMMARY THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANIE! City of Edina PRINCIPALOFFICE ADDRESS 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota.- POLICY NUMBER BA 6094543 AGENCY Harris - Homeyer EXPIRATION DATE 7/1/85 PRODUCING OFFICE Mpls -351 SUMMARY OF (LOCATION) All locations PERIOD COVERED FROM 7/1/84 TO 4/16/85 CLAIM OCC. CODE TYPE OF ACCIDENT - PREVENT- ABLE NON PRE- VENTABLE DOUBT- FUL PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY TOTAL REMARKS (MENTION OUTSTANDING CAUSES) 001 INTERSECTION COLLISION 1 1 1 Police 002 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE AHEAD 003 HEAD ON COLLISION 004 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE BEHIND 1 1 1 City Hall - backing up 005 SIDESWIPE- PASSING 1 1 1 Plow- bounced off curl. 006 SIDESWIPE -BEING PASSED 007 HIT PARKED VEHICLE 008 HIT WHILE PARKED 1 1 1 Police -hit by ill dr- 009 HIT PEDESTRIAN 010 COLLISION WITH FIXED OBJECT 1 1 1 Police -hit pole /tenc( 011 COLLISION WITH OTHER OBJECT 012 OVERTURNED 013 RAN OFF ROADWAY 014 LOADING OR UNLOADING 015 EQUIPMENT FAILURE 016 FIRE 017 GLASS BREAKAGE 018 TOTAL THEFT 019 PARTIAL THEFT 020 AUTO GARAGE CLAIMS 021 ALL OTHER AMMI7I1 Totals Al ov... ov. 3 1 1 5 5 _ I_ Police average 400,000 miles per year travel. H 30701 F) 3/7S INDUSTRIAL. .4XIDENT SUMMARY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT INSUREDS NAME LOCATION PERIOD COVERED - ,ity of Edina A1 Departments 1 De artt P p 7 /1/O4 7/1/83 ©■ FROM TO / ACCIDENT TYPE STRUCK STRUCK BY CAUGHT IN, OH ABRADED, CUT OR FALLS SPRAINS AND MISCELLANEOUS F AGAINST OR BETWEEN PUNCTURED STRAINS CONTACT A, tiq Aft ° ° v q oq ry o" ° V 00, �• A. 4 ti 4 O� 0y tiq °Q4 Q = l v VV 4 V O O ? q 4 O Oqi 4 �� �vO04i q ?' A. Departments: i @ i ..° �� J c A uq ° ?4 �rl e� o �O . - ■■ ©s © ©■ ©■■ ■e ■e NOON■■■ ■ ©■ NOON■ Public ■■■ ©■■■ ©■ ®ee■eN■■e■ ©■ © ©■■N■■e City Ha No NONE ■■■ ■■S■■■■ ■ MEN N■ ■■■■■■ ©■■NONE .. - ■■■ ■�■■ NOON NOON ee■■■■■ © ©■ ■ ©■■e , _ _ N■■ ■N■ NOON NOON NOON■■■ ■ ©■ ■N■■■ ■■■ ■■■ NOON NOON ■N■■■■■ ■■■ ■■■N■ M EN■■■ ■■■■NN■N■NN■■N■■■■ NOON 0 OMI■■EE ■■■■■■■■■■■■■s■■■■■ ■■■ eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee ■ ®me ■eeeo H 907E IFI 7ieF � � ..... - r_'; ,. ... •. _., -... ........ .. VEHICULAR ACCIDENT SUMMARY THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANIES TOTALS H 3070 1 FI 3 /75 14 1 3 18 - 18 POLICY NUMBER EXPIRATION DATE - .ity of Edina A6094543 74581 7/1/85 PRINCIPAL OFFICE ADDRESS 4801 West 50th Street AGENCY PRODUCING OFFICE Edina, Minnesota Harris- Homeyer Mpls -351 SUMMARY OF (LOCATION) PERIOD COVERED All departments 7/1/83 7/1/84 FROM TO CLAIM OCC. CODE TYPE OF ACCIDENT PREVENT - ABLE _NON PRE- VENTABLE DOUBT- FUL PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY TOTAL REMARKS (M�EN TION OUTSTANDING CAUSES) 001 INTERSECTION COLLISION 1 1 2 2 o ice -snowy con itic Police-other pulled 002 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE AHEAD 1 1 1 Police -hit in parkinE lot 003 HEAD ON COLLISION 2 - 2 ublic Works -plow 2 On ice 004 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE BEHIND 5 5 rolled back at lights 5 Backing -three P.W.- 005 SIDESWIPE - PASSING 3 3 Olice responding . Van-pagging hit in 006 SIDESWIPE -BEING PASSED I, Snow storm. Parks 1 007 HIT PARKED VEHICLE .2 1 3 3 P1OW -hit ice road 008. HIT WHILE PARKED Police- rolled into 009 HIT PEDESTRIAN 010 COLLISION WITH FIXED OBJECT 011 COLLISION WITH OTHER OBJECT 012 OVERTURNED 013 RAN OFF ROADWAY 014 LOADING OR UNLOADING 015 EQUIPMENT FAILURE 016 FIRE 017 GLASS BREAKAGE 018 TOTAL THEFT 019 PARTIAL THEFT 020 AUTO GARAGE CLAIMS 021 ALL OTHER Changing Lanes 2 2 2 City & Police hit ADL)I TIL7NA1 acueoRc other in lane TOTALS H 3070 1 FI 3 /75 14 1 3 18 - 18 4: LOSS CONTROL REPORT TO MANAGEMENT F- !%ItJA JIFF CF'; i FR - - - - -- /i�J�l Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Smith: May 28, 1987 Loss Control Service Visit May 27, 1987 - Edinborough Park C The purpose of our visit was to perform a physical observation of the new indoor park to determine if any hazards existed that needed to be corrected prior to the opening of the facility. Our tour was conducted by Mr. Bill Bach - Park Manager. As the construction activities were still ongoing during our tour of the facility the exact extent of the life safety equip- ment provided in the building could not be determined. This included lack of exit signs above many of the doors in the facilities, and inoperable exit signs in several areas. It is felt that prior to the opening of the park you will need to have your local fire inspection officials fully inspect the structure to determine that the necessary exit signs are being provided throughout the facility. It is +felt critical that the signs be provided in the swimming pool area, and also in the lower area by the waterfall, as the means of exiting these areas of the building are not readily visible by the general public. It is going to be recommended that lighted exit signs be visible from all points in the building, including the lower area by the water- fall and the rear storage areas. Because of the transient nature of the people who will be occupying the building it is felt that the increased exit lighting is warranted. Also you will need to address the marking of the exit leading from the pool area which requires the patrons to move up the stairway to the exit near the running track. As this is not a normal exiting feature for most buildings a sign or arrow showing the upward movement of the exit would be required. As was mentioned inspection of the building by the local city code enforcement officials prior to opening 1 "2 ! 11 1, ,,.,., s: r i ,tce to v ork. gnod D _1c;liCe, r,Ui " St Ins,jreds in meeting their legal obligation to maintain a sate n ,u ! ;. "mn t, ! : wrlude every loss potential, code violation or exception to nr hr +z,.tn ; `ueci`icaily commented on and described in our recommendations or m �; my hazardous conditions on your property. Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager r City of Edina May 28, 1987 Page 2 to the public would seem warranted to determine if the exit mark- ing signs are adequate in the structure. The other area of concern noted during the tour was the location of the stone seating near the childrens play area and the stone wall and two stone roof supports near the ice skating rink. As was discussed both of these conditions create a potential personal injury hazard to patrons using these areas. Because of the many sharp corners on the stone in both of these areas a recommendation is going to be submitted that padding or guarding be provided for these areas to prevent an injury to a patron who may fall either in the playground area or while ice skating in the skating rink. As was mentioned by Mr. Bock you may wish to investigate an appropriately colored pad for the long wall in the ice skating rink to provide an esthetically appropriate guarding material. It is felt that these guards should be obtained as expeditiously as possible, because of the anticipated heavy use of the building during the summer months. The other major area of concern for the structure is the present lack of any emergency preparedness program dealing with fires and natural emergencies. Attached to this letter is a sample copy of an emergency policy program which you can use as a guide for de- veloping your own program for your building. From our initial tour of your building it appears that the critical portion in developing your program will be determining the number of people that can be placed in the rear store room areas during inclement weather. You may need to investigate making arrangements with the attached office building or apartment building for moving patrons of the building to these protected areas in the event of inclement weather. As with the recommendation dealing with the exposed stone in the playground and ice skating areas it is felt that the development of an emergency evacuation procedure for the building should be a high priority item. The program should be developed closing with your building's security personnel, to ob- tain their input into crowd control and evacuation procedures. Please feel free to contact me during your developmental stages of your program to help you in the development of an effective emergency evacuation procedure. As was discussed I will plan on making several unannounced walk - through visits to the facility in the coming months to observe Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina May 28, 1987 Page 3 the building in operation and employees performing their assigned job tasks. This will include a weekend observation of the build- ing to observe the part -time employees you will have working dur- ing these hours. I will be contacting you after each of these visits to review the findings of my survey. I will plan on per- forming an unannounced survey of the building approximately 30 days after your scheduled opening. The following recommendations were discussed and you did agree that compliance would be received. RECOMMENDATIONS: 87 -5 -2: Padding or guarding should be provided for the stone wall and two exposed stone support pilars along the edge of the ice skating rink. Because of the sharp corners and rough surfaces associated with the exposed stone on these areas it is felt that guarding or padding is needed. 87 -5 -3: Padding or guarding should be provided for the stone seating area provided around the perimeter of the childrens playground area. This guarding or padding is felt most needed where the seating is within four feet of the playground equipment. This padding or guarding could be provided by either a padded ledge around the end of the stone seating area or by pro- viding a fully padded seat on the top of the ledge. This padding or guarding is felt needed because of the amount of childrens play activities that will be tak- ing place in this area. 87 -5 -4: An emergency preparedness program should be developed for the park, with emphasis on the hazards associated with fire, inclement weather, and injury to a patron of the park. The program should be developed with the help of the operations department, security de- partment, and the maintenance personnel. Once the program is developed it should be communicated to all park employees. A properly developed emergency preparedness program may help to facilitate the effective handling of an emergency situation. Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina May 28, 1987 Page 4 87 -5 -5: Lighted exit signs should be provided for all exit doors leading from the building. Directional exit marking signs also should be provided in areas of the building where the lighted exit.door marking signs are not visible. Because of the transient nature of the patrons occupying the park it is felt that the exit signs should be visible from all points of the park. Properly marked exit ways help to facilitiate rapid evacuation of the building. 87 -5 -6: The managing company of the attached apartment complex should be contacted and requested to lock the door leading from the apartment complex into the park area whenever the park is closed. If the apartment complex will not lock this door when the park is closed it is felt that you will need to provide a fence or gate for the entrance way into the park from the apartment complex, to control apartment residents access to the park during the hours the park is closed. Allowing un- authorized personnel to enter the park area during the hours when the park is closed creates a potential serious personal injury hazard to these people because of the lack of supervisory employees for the park and the low lighting levels in the facility at this time. 87 -5 -7: A yellow line should be painted on the floor a minimum of 36 inches around the perimeter of the hot water heaters for the swimming pool. These marks will warn maintenance and life guard employees to remain a safe distance from the hot water heaters, because of the potential burn hazard created by the hot surfaces on the hot water heater. This also will inform the em- ployees to store all inventory the necessary distance from the hot water heaters. I will plan on contacting you during the month of July to review the results of my survey of the park. If I can be of any further assistance in the interim, or if you have any questions regarding this letter or the recommendations, please feel free to contact me at any time. Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina May 28, 1987 Page 5 RB /lk CC: Ms. Dianne Julien Personnel Department City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 r Very truly yours, Robert Bringgold Senior Technical Representative Loss Control Department Mr. William Homeyer Harris - Homeyer, Inc. 6161 Wooddale Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424 MEMORANDUM D TO: ALL EMPLOYEES FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: WORK- RELATED INJURIES DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 1985 As you may be aware, the City of Edina has recently contracted the services of RTW, Inc. to assist in the management of our worker's compensation claims. Together with the services of the Occupational' Health section of Park Nicollet Clinic, RTW will be working with the injuried employee, the employer, the treating physican and Home Insurance Company to promote your expedicious return to work. The City will no longer be using Southwest Clinic as a primary facilitl for worker's compensation injuries.. The Worker's Compensation Law is intended to assure the ouick and efficient delivery of benefits to injured workers at a reasonable cost to employers. The statutes governing this system are complicated, and it is sometimes difficult to be sure that employees are informed of their rights and that they receive a high quality of medical care and prompt payment of benefits. In association with RTW, the City of Edina, has employed a means which will help you through the process if you become injuried. IF YOU ARE INJURED, regard less of how minor the incident may seem, report': it to your supervisor immediately as you have done in the past. Your supervisor will document the accident by filling out a First Report of Injury form with you. If medical care is necessary, your supervisor will contact Park Nicollet's Occupational Health Department in St. Louis Park and indicate you ave sustained an injury that requires medical attention. Prompt treatment has already been given to Edina employees for injuries such as fractured wrists, back strains and cuts that have required stitches right at the clinic. Park Nicollet's Occupational Health Department hours are 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday thro.ug Friday (927-3170). If the injury. occurs between the hours of 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. Monday through Friday or 8:00 a.m. untill 9:00 p.m. on Saturday, Sunday and holidays report to the Urgent Care Center at Park Nicollet. In the event that the accident occurs after Clinic or Urgen are ours or anytime that it is a life, threatening situation please go to Fairview Southdale Emergency Room After you have been seen by a physican for treatment you need to return to your supervisor indicating diagnosis, treatment needed etc. If you are going to be missing work it is to-be so indicated by the Doctor together with the amount of time anticipated to be absent. Under the Worker's Compensation Law you do have the option of selecting another physician. However, we ask that you be seen periodically by our choice of physician. By initially going to Park Nicollet's Occupational Health Denart- ment, you can be assured of skilled continuous treatment in the area of occupational medicine. If you choose your own physician and later wish to change physicans you must get permission from the insurer before seeing a new physician. This should be coordinated with Lisa Lammer and Home Insurance. H ease see Lisa if you have any questions regardina anv bills you may have. Work - Related Injuries 02/08/85 Page 2 YOU NEED TO RETURN TO WORK AS SOON AS YOU ARE MEDICALLY ABLE. We will make an effort to place you in a position which is within the restrictions the doctor may place on.your activity. If you feel the job you are performing is not within those restrictions, speak with your super- visor to see if further modifications may be necessary. If your doctor indicates you will be unable to work for a longer period of time than initially authorized, another signed doctor's statement is required to be submitted to the City. IF YOU HAVE RETUPNED TO WORK FOLLOWING AN INJURY BUT FEEL THAT YOU CANNOT CONTINUE WORKING, you need to notify your supervisor at once. An authorization from your physican which excuses you from work must be obtained at the BEGINNING of your absence. Failure to do so may jeopardize your benefits. A NURSE FROM RTW MAY VISIT YOU. The nurse is available to explain your rights and responsibilities under the Worker's Compensation Law and to help you through your recovery process, coordinating your treat- ment with your doctors and speaking with appropriate,personnel about your benefits. Your cooperation with the nurse will let her be of more assistance to you. If you have any questions regarding your benefits, please speak to your supervisor or Lisa Lammer. Park Nicollet Medical Center 5000 West 39th Street St. Louis Park, Mn 55416 927 -3170 (tall MedCenter Building one block north of Edcelsior Blvd.) 0 A n L`i ty ; rer Fairview Southdale 6401 France Ave South Edina, Mn 55435 924 -5000 (Crosstown and France Ave) N_ RIM o e CITY OF EDINA N °I ACCIDENT REPORT WORKER'S COMPENSATION /GENERAL LIABILITY Worker's Compensation - complete parts A &C General Liability - complete parts A &B Vehicle Liability - complete parts A &D, if City employee injuries, complete parts A,C, & D - State Accident Report of damage in excess of $500.00 Complete on report for each injury 9a /6 1 Cd Injured Person /Employee /City Driver Address _Date of Birth Date of Accident Time Location Witness Witness Phone # AT Describe in detail the extent of the injury How did the accident /injury occur? Telephone # Date Reported Was First Aid administered? yes no Was the injured person taken to the hospital, doctor or home? what care was given: Action taken to prevent recurrence of accident /injury Describe in detail the extent of injury Explain fully Description of accident Did employee return to work? Last day worked /time left Date /Time returned Employee doing what when injured? Did employee require medical attention? If so, where was medical care given? Condition or act causing accident /injury Was there equipment malfunction? Action taken to prevent recurrence of accident /injury CONTINUED ON REVERSE SIDE Other Driver Address Type of Vehicle /year Condition or act causing accident /injury Telephone # License Plate # Supervisor Date Department Head Date WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROCEDURE Supervisor should be contacted of accident within 24 hours of occurence. Supervisor will complete accident report and submit to Personnel /Insurance person within 24 hours of notice -of accident. It is recommended that medical services be provided by Southwest Clinic. Phone # 920 -6000 Employee must keep Personnel /Insurance person abreast of any medical attention that is required, name of doctor administering medical attention and time lost due to injury. Any bills that are received by employee should be sub- mitted to Personnel /Insurance person to forward to Worker's Compensation Insurance carrier. MINNESOTA DATA PRIVACY ACT As required by the Minnesota Data Privacy Act you are hereby informed that the . information requested on this form is collected pursuant to statute to provide ..statistical data. The time and place of the accident, names and parties in- volved and insurance information may be disclosed to any person involved in an accident or to other persons as specified by law. Employee Signature * Only of employee fills out form Claim Exhibit for CITY OF EDINA Producer HARRIS - HOMEYER CO P 0 BOX 24030 PAGE 1 THE 1100.9E MIt,CIEAPOLIS MN 55424 351 -H12 -034 H 23035 H Rev. 12 -82 Policy Nunibi•: Type of Insurance Report,A$.Ot Policy Period Distrdndion Run f'a p: BA 996031 AUTOMOBILE 0 101 86 TO 12 31 86 From 07 01 86 To 07 01 87 INSURED'S COPY 70,980 H Claim OccurrerPce Risk Loa Status Description Amount Paid (Less Credit) Tut;il Incurred Expense Paid (Allocated) T e of Occurrence Codes yp Automobile Off Nunalner S>. IvP,. li:ate POLICY YEAR 1986 ABI Automobile Bodily Injury 351 796025 1 APD 07 10 86 MI SMESTAD LYLE C ACL Automobile Physical Damage- Collision SIDESWIPE - OTHER VEHICLE PASSING AMP Aartomobile Medical Payments ACC Automobile Physical Daniage -Other Than Collision 351 796584 1 APO 08 15 86 MI DOE JOHN C 297 297 APD Automobile Property Damage CODE TO BE REVIEWED TBR To Be Reviewer) 351 796917 1 APO 09 08 86 MINN JOHNSTON C 371 371 Liability COLLISION WITH FIXED OBJECT CML Commercial Multiple Peril Liability 351 797502 1 ABI 30 11 86 MINN MALONEY JOHN C EXL Excess Lines Liability INTERSECTION COLLISION OBI Other Bodily Liability OPD Other Properly Liability 351 797612 1 APO 10 20 86 HIM THOMPSON S C 664 664 PBI Products Bodily Injury HIT PARKED VEHICLE PPD Products Properly Darnage TBR To Be Reviewed 351 797791 1 ACL 10 31 86 HIM KANE C 351 797791 2 APD 10 31 86 HIM COLLISION WITH OTHER OBJECT C 682 682 Workers' Compensation 351 798258 1 APO 10 22 86 HIM RADJENOVICH J C IND Compensation Indemnity HIT PARKED VEHICLE MED Compensation Medical TBR To Be Reviewed POLICY YEAR TOTAL CLAIM COUNT 7 29014 2,014 GRAND TOTAL CLAIM COUNT 7 2014 2,014 Other Lines ACC Accident A 8 H Accident and Health DB Disability Benefits DDD Comprehensive Dishonesty, Disappearance, Destruction FID Fidelity IM Inland Marine OM Ocean Marine SUR Surety TBR To Be Reviewed * Reler to Description for Coverage Involved Status Codes * Open C Closed Description Prefix Codes (When a code precedes a description use table below to qualify description) 1. Hit by 2. Hit against 3. Caught in, on, or between 4. Lifting, pulling, pushing, throwing 5. Fall or slip, on, at, over, or from Claim Exhibit for CITY OF EDINA Producer HARRIS - HOMEYER CO P 0 BOX 24030 MItOIEAPOLIS MN PAGE 55424 351 -H12 -034 H 23035 H Rev 12 -82 Pulicy Ni.;nbe- Type of Insurance Report As Of Policy Period Dislribidion IZun P:r to WC P999817 WORKERS COMPENSATION 07 01 86 �O 12 31 86 From 07 01 86 To 07 01 87 INSURED'S COPY 71000 H Claim Occurrence" Risk Loc. Description Status Amount Paid (Less Credit) Tot,il Incurred Expense Paid (Allocated) Type of Occurrence Codes Automobile Off Number Sx- i` lx' Urde POLICY YEAR 1986 ABI Automobile Bodily Injury 354 111272 1 MED 07 15 86 MIM BUCHANAN IS BACK C 119 119 ACL Automobile Physical Damage- Collision 4 -HEAVY OR BULKY OBJECT, N.O.C. AMP Automobile Medical Payments AOC Automobile Physical Damago -Other Than Collision 354 111308 1 MED 07 16 86 MINI TAYLOR.G FOOT C APD Automobile Property Damage , 1 -METAL ITEMS TBR To Be Reviewed 354 111510 1 HIED 08 05 86 MIM SWANSON LEE BACK C 30 30 Liability 4 -HEAVY OR BULKY OBJECT, N.O.C. CIVIL Commercial Multiple Peril Liability 354 111650 1 MEE 08 22 86 MI1144 MALICKI R LEG C EXL Excess Lines Liability 1- FLYING, FALLING. MOVING OBJECT 081 Other Bodily Liability OPD Other Property Liability 354 111720 1 MED 09 04 86 MIM KLEIt.BERG E EYE C 114 114 PBI Products Bodily Injury TOXIC SUBSTANCE - CONTACTED PPD Products Property Damage TBR To Be Reviewed 354 111773 1 HIED 09 04 86 MIM BRATAELL M LEG C 5- MACHINERY, N.O.C. Yorkers' Compensation 354 111836 1 MED 09 15 86 MIM SCHON RICHARD EYE C 75 75 IND Cumpensation Indemnity PRODUCTS - FOREIGN OBJECT W MED Compensation Medical TBR To Be Reviewed 354 111854 1 MEE 09 18 86 Mlt*l OLSON THOMAS WRIST C 23 23 ANIMALS OR INSECTS Other Lines 354 111943 1 MED 09 29 86 MIN HILL MARK ELBOW C 104 104 ACC Accident 1- TOOLS, POWERED, HAND A 8 H Accident and Health DB Disability Benefits ell 354 111944 1 ME 09 24 86 MINI FINCH CURT BACK C DDD Comprehensive Dishonesty. Disappearance, 4- FURNITURE, FIXTURES, FURNISHINGS Destruction FID Fidelity 354 112030 1 ME 10 07 86 MINI VERNON C BACK * 208 1,500 IM Inland Marine 354 112030 2 Itl 10 07 86 Mitt 5 -HEAVY OR BULKY OBJECT, N.O.C. * 936 2,725 OM Ocean Marine SUR Surety 354 112036 2 MEE 10 07 86 MIM BAGLEY DOUG THIGH C 39 39 TBR To Be Reviewed 1- FLYING9 FALLING, MOVING OBJECT * Refer to Description for Coverage Involved 354 112106 1 ME13 10 09 86 MIM SCHON RICHARD. BACK C 52 52 Status Codes * Open C Closed 4- VEHICLE Description Prefix Codes (when a code precedes 354 112107 1 MEE 10 15 86 HIM STROHOFFER A FINGER * 100 a description use table below to qualify description) CUT ON BROKEN GLASS L Hit by 2. Hit against 3. Caught in, on, or between 4. Lifting, pulling, pushing, throwing 5. Fall or slip, on, at, over, or from Claim Exhibit for CITY OF EDINA Producer HARRIS- HOMEYER CO P O EOX 24030 MINNEAPOLIS t2J PAGE 55424 351 -1112 -034 L- ' _ 'l 11-t 1, 0. . H 23035 H R---v 12.82. POIIL :q' N(111 r" f';pe of InSUfance Report As Of Policy Period Dtstrd)ubon li'm WC P999817 WORKERS COMPENSATION 07 01 86 TO 12 31 86 From 07 01 86 To 07 01 87 INSL'RED'S COPY 719001 N Claim Occurrence F115k LOC. Status. Description Amount Paid (Less Credit) Total Incurred Er 1,>nse Paid c.. (Allocoted) n Typ., of Occurrence Codes Automobile Oft Numhiv S. I .pr Drite POLICY YEAR 1986 ABI Automobile Bodily Injury 354 112166 1 MED 10 21 86 MINN MCMAHON DANIE BACK # 100 ACL Automobile Physical Damagr,- Collision 4 -HEAVY OR BULKY OBJECT, N.O.C. AMP Automobile Medical Paynu:nts AOC Automcbile Physical Damage -Other 'Than Ccdlisinn 354 112167 1 MED 10 21 86 MINN HAMZEN CHRIS EYE C 108 108 APD Automobile Property Damn iqe 1 -OTHER FCREIGN MATTER TBR To Be Reviewed /�1r 354 112263 1 MED 10 13 86 MINI MALICKI R FINGER C 62 62 Liability 1- TOOLS9 POWEREO• HAND CIVIL Commercial Multiple Peril Liability 354 112277 1 ME11 10 31 86 MINI KANE KEMETH HEAD * 100 EXL Excess Lines Liability 1- VEHICLE OBI Other Bodily Liability OPD Other Property Liability 354 112324 1 MED 11 06 86 MIta DREVLOW G FACE * 100 PBI Products Bodily Injury OCCUPATIONAL ILLNESS OR DISEASE PPD Products Property Damage TBR To Be Reviewed 354 112369 1 MED 11 16 86 MINN MARSTCH STEP KNEE * 100 5- SIDEWALK Workers' Compensation 354 112370 1 MED 11 09 86 HIM BEHR JAMES BACK * 100 IND Compensation Indemnity 4 -OTHER PERSON MED Compensation Medical TBR To Be Reviewed 354 112371 1 MED 11 09 86 MIN14 RADJENOVICH J VAR INJ * 100 4 -OTHER PERSGN Other Lines 354 112372 1 MED 11 07 86 HIM HALVERSON JAM FINGER C 70 70 ACC Accident 4 -1:000 ITEMS A 8 H Accident and Health DB Disability Benefits 354 112488 1 MEC 11 03 86 MINN DORNSEIF DAN KNEE C 24 24 DDD Comprehensive Dishonesty, Disappearance, 4- FURNITURE, FIXTURES, FURNISHINGS Destruction FID Fidelity 354 112560 1 MED 12 05 66 HIM JOHNSON T KNEE * 100 IM Inland Marine 1- VEHICLE OM Ocean Marine SUR Surety 354 112650 1 MEC 12 09 86 HIM DEHN BRUCE EYE * 100 TBR To Be Reviewed 1 -OTHER FOREIGN MATTER * Refer to Description for Coverage Involved POLICY YEAR TOTAL CLAIM COUNT 26 1,964 5,945 Status Codes * Open C Closed GRAND TOTAL CLAIM COUNT 26 1,964 5,945 Description Prefix Codes (When a code precedes a description use table below to qualify description) 1 Hit by 2. Hit against 3. Caught in, on, or between 4. Lifting, pulling, pushing, throwing 5. Fall or slip, on, at, over, or from Claim Exhibit for CITY OF EDINA I','II,,y fit if !I^ I ype of h,,ul;lncr, GL 994669 GENERAL LIABILITY Producer PAGE 1 HARRIS - HOMEYER CO P 0 EOX 24030 MItC;EAPOLIS KI 55424 351 -H12 -034 Rvp,o(t As Of Policy Period 07 01 86 T0, 12 31 86 Frorn 07 O1 86 To 07 01 87 C1,um Occurn:nco rusk 1 -oc Status Ihr1',e:ril;hon Amount Pahl (Less Credit 1 Iotul Ilir..lrrr:d L pen;c• P:ur.% (All•:Ic;Itudl Type Of Occurrence COtJCS — Automobile ut <)tl Nunitrcl ti:. 11 2303.5 H Fiev I? -82 ' U:.IIi!,;.Ihl�ll - 17rrn f':I pr T1.FSt1aEn.S cnpY 7n.o7r N C1,um Occurn:nco rusk 1 -oc Status Ihr1',e:ril;hon Amount Pahl (Less Credit 1 Iotul Ilir..lrrr:d L pen;c• P:ur.% (All•:Ic;Itudl Type Of Occurrence COtJCS — Automobile ut <)tl Nunitrcl ti:. I:n,. I);Itct POLICY YEAR 1986 ABI Atlton),A)Ile Bodily Injury 351 795802 1 OPD 07 05 86 MINI ROBERTS M C ACL Arllun)rlbde I'hyr,ic;d D;in,:i,Irt- Cullciion 1 -WOOD ITEMS AMP AIIIomohile Modlc:.11 F-;I;nu:Ilt:; AOC Alllonleblle PII'ymt:;il D:Ill l; li ll:- Ullll!1 t tl; 111 C llisi' ll 351 795916 1 OPD 07 09 86 MINI FALCONER C AI'D Automobile Proputly Dnm;,qu PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM TBR To Be Revwv /,c d "1 351 796168 1 OFT 07 02 86 MINIII JENSEN ALBERT C Liability PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM Ctv1L Commercial Multiple Peal Lclbility 351 796339 1 CPO 07 23 86 MINI MCMERTY S C 240 240 EXL Excess Lines Liahility 351 796339 2 OBI 07 23 86 MINu PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM * 500 OBI Other Bodily Liability OPD Other Properly Liability 351 756899 1 OPD 07 20 86 HINt WESCOTT C PBI Products Bodily Injury PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VAN.'DALISM PPD Products Property Damage TBR To Be Reviuwed 351 796975 1 OBI 09 06 86 HIM PRENTICE G C 5 -1100D ITEMS Workers' Compensation 351 797137 1 CPD 09 18 86 MIIRl KIRCHNER T C 37 37 IND Compensation Inclenmily PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM MED Compensation Medical TBR To Be Revicrved 351 797138 1 CPO 09 18 86 MINN BUJOLD D 975 PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM Other Lines 351 797200 1 CPO 09 20 86 MINI CARLSON C ACC Accident Fn OPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM A 8 FI Accident and Health DB Disability Benefits 351 797912 1 OPC 11 06 86 MIKT BORDONARO JAN * 975 DDD Comprehensive Dishonesty. Disappearance. PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM D@SIRICtion FID Fidelity 351 797921 1 OBI 11 12 86 MINH EIDE D * 50 IM Inland Marine 5- SIDE14ALK Ohl Ocean Marine SUR Surety 351 798402 1 OPD 12 11 86 MIN11 GALLUP LYNN * 975 TBR To Be Reviewed WATER * Refer to Description for Coverage Involved 351 798410 1 OPO 12 09 86 MINII KOSHAK * 975 Status Codes * Oven C Cl;;sud PROPERTY DAMAGE INCL. VANDALISM Description Prefix Codes (when a code prct e(!,- , POLICY YEAR TOTAL CLAIM COUNT 13 277 4027 a desu iption use table below to clu,lllfy descrill- tion ) GRAND TOTAL CLAIM COU14T 13 277 4.727 t. Hit by 2. 1'flt against 3, Caught in, on, or between 4, Lifting• pulling, pushing, throwing 5. Fall or slip, on, at, over, or from - s REPORT TO M EDINA OFFICE CENTER �^ 1 1000 7600 FRANCE AVE, S., P. 0. BOX 35627 February 6, A MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55435 Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to the City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Smith: Industrial Hygiene Survey January 20, 1987 Public Works Garage l Attached you will find a completed Industrial Hygiene Report that l details the results of Carbon Monoxide measurements that were taken at the garage on the above captioned date. As you will note, the air sampling results indicated, that at the time of the I survey, the Carbon Monoxide levels within the mechanics' bays were within the acceptable limits. During my discussions with the employees, they informed that they felt, that on the day of the survey, it was an "average day" and not a worse case scenario. Because of that, I would like to return to the Public Works Garage on a day in which there is a snow fall because of the increased traffic possibility of the snow plows entering and leaving the building on a regular basis. L As you will note, I have made two recommendations in reference to this.survey. If you have any questions on these recommendations, please feel free to contact me. I will be contacting Mr. Gene Bartz again in the near future to Important Notice The Home services described herein are offered to assist insureds in meeting their legal obligation to maintain a safe place to work. The services offered do not cladn to find or include every loss potential, code violation or exception to good practice, but relate only to those hazards specifically commented on and described in our recommendations or reports. It remains your responsibility to remedy any hazardous conditions on your property. H :;3843 I' Rev, 01 -b-! r try and arrange a retest within the garage. I have also attached additional information in reference to the effects of Carbon Monoxide exposure. This may be of use in your "Employee Right to Know" training program. Very truly yours, Joanne Laney Technical Specialist - Industrial Hygiene Loss Control Department JL:pjn cc: Mr. William Homeyer Harris- Homeyer, Incorporated 6161 Wooddale Avenue, Suite 101 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424 Mr. David Velde Sanitarian City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 2 I - L i See important notice on reverse side I — H 33116 F Rev. 01-83 L r I CITY OF EDINA Public Works Department 5146 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55424 DATE-OF-SURVEY: January 20, 1987 PERSONNEL CONTACTED: Mr. Gene Bartz, Public Works Superintendent Mr. Earl Meichsmer, Tri -City Testing PURPOSE: The purpose of this survey was to conduct a Time Weighted Average air sampling for Carbon Monoxide in the mechanics' bays of the Public Works' Garage. NOTE: The observations made and the results presented in this report are t indicative of the conditions in the shop only at the time of the Lsurvey. LINTRODUCTION: This was the first Industrial Hygiene Survey conducted by the Home L Insurance Company at the Public Works' Garage for the City of Edina. L An area sample was conducted in the center of the mechanics' bay and a review of employee work practices was done. LRECOMMENDATIONS - SUMMARY: The following is only a summary of the recommendations being made L as a result of the survey. These recommendations were made primarily from observations.as well as discussion with employees within the mechanics' bay. L1 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT _ LH33335 F Rev. 7-03 G IH87 -1 -1: All employees entering and leaving this building and operating equipment within it should be trained in the hazards of Carbon Monoxide. IH87 -1 -2: All air circulation fans and air handling equipment should be left on during both the winter and summer months. Natural ventilation (leaving the doors open) is an uncontrolled form of reducing Carbon Monoxide. PROCEDURES: MONITORING: Air samples were taken utilizing a Mine Safety Applicance Mini -005 Carbon Monoxide Meter. Serial Number 5- 00363. The meter reads instantaneous, peak, and average Carbon Monoxide levels. EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION: The meter was calibrated prior to the survey in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. OBSERVATIONS: GENERAL PROCESSES: I There are approximately six employees working as mechanics within l the Public Works' Garage. The mechanics' bays are not physically separated from the vehicle storage bays. The mechanics' bays are located on the south side of the building with the vehicle storage L_ bays on the north side. Vehicles enter and leave the building by two large overhead doors both at the north and south sides. Vehicles are sometimes left running in the storage area of the facility, and are also left running while being worked on in the mechanics' bays. Vehicles are also required to pull up to the mechanics' bays for periodic greasing and oiling, particularly, during snow removal months, prior to exiting the building. When vehicles are being worked on within the mechanics' bays, ventilation flexible tubing is placed over the tail pipes for the L purpose of removing the Carbon Monoxide into the ventilation system; however, when the snow plows during snow clearing periods are being greased, they will be running, but no ventilation will L_ 2 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT _ i H33335 F Rev. 7-83 40 I be installed. Employees will also sometimes leave equipment running (generally not mechanics) within the building. At the time of the survey, the air handling equipment as well as a ceiling fan above one bay was left on. The design capacity of the air handling ventilation system was not known. The air handling equipment is not always turned on during the summer months because many of the doors are left open. A brief discussion was conducted with two of the mechanics working in the shop at the time of the survey. RESULTS-AND-DISCUSSIONS: The air sampling results indicated, that at the time of the survey, the Time Weighted Average (T.W.A.)exposure to Carbon Monoxide was below the established Threshold Limit Value (T.L.V.). The peak reading during the survey was 92 parts per million that occurred during the early part of the morning when several cars were moved in to the mechanics' bays and several trucks were leaving the building. It is estimated that it took approximately one minute for the level to be reduced to below 50 parts per. million. It appears during discussions with the mechanics that many of them do understand the necessity of limiting the amount of vehicles j running in the building as well as using the flexible ventilation I hoses whenever possible. However, because many other employees within the Public Works Department would be entering and leaving the building and running vehicles in the building, the mechanics may not have allot of control over what their exposure is. Be- cause of that, the recommendation in reference to training Public Works' employees in the hazards of Carbon Monoxide and control measures to reduce the amount of Carbon Monoxide exposure was l made. Employees also discussed whether or not there was a need to turn l on the air make -up system during the summer months when all of the doors are open. I reviewed at this time that although keeping the doors open would definitely assist; the air make -up unit should also be left on as doors will only provide "natural" ventilation and it would be hard to determine the positive or negative affect of that ventilation. RECOMMENDATIONS: ____________ LIH87 -1 -1: All employees in the Public Works Department who would be entering and leaving this building, particularly H33335 F Rev. 7-83 3 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT � 1 H33335 F Rev. 7-83 operating equipment, should be trained in the hazards of Carbon Monoxide. This training should also include the importance of not leaving vehicles running, and the effects of leaving a vehicle running on those mechanics or employees left behind in the maintenance shop. This training could be included in the "Employee Right to Know" training already in affect. IH87 -1 -2: The air make -up and ventilation system should be kept on at all times whenever mechanics are working in the repair bays. This would also include the summertime • when doors and windows are open. This is primarily to ensure that adequate air ventilation is occurring rather than leaving it up to the "natural" ventilation of the doors being open. 4 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS GARAGE Location or Equipment Operations/ and Sample Employee Number Public Works MSA Mini -CO Garage Mechanics' Monitor Bay - Center #5 -00363 L L L L AIR SAMPLING RESULTS TABLE Airborne Test Volume Concentration ACGIH Duration Sampled Detected TLV Minutes Liters Contaminant (PPM) (PPM) 348 -- Carbon Monoxide 23.18 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT i H33W5 F Rev. 7$3 50 R Occupational Health Guideline for Carbon Monoxide INTRODUCTION This guideline is intended as a source of information for employees, employers, physicians, industrial hygienists, and other occupational health professionals who may have a need for such information. It does not attempt to present all data; rather, it presents pertinent information and data in summary form. SUBSTANCE IDENTIFICATION • Formula: CO • Synonyms: Monoxide • Appearance and odor: Colorless, odorless gas. PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE LIMIT (PEL) The current OSHA standard for carbon monoxide is 50 parts of carbon monoxide per million parts of air (ppm) averaged over an eight -hour work shift. This may also be expressed as 55 milligrams of carbon monoxide per cubic meter of air (mg /m'). NIOSH has recommended that the permissible exposure limit be reduced to 35 ppm averaged over a work shift of up to 10 hours per day, 40 hours per week, with a ceiling of 200 ppm. The NIOSH Criteria Document for Carbon Monoxide should be consulted for more detailed information. HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION • Routes of exposure Carbon monoxide can affect the body if it is inhaled or if liquid carbon monoxide comes in contact with the eyes or skin. • Effects of overexposure Exposure to carbon monoxide decreases the ability of the blood to carry oxygen to the tissues. Inhalation of carbon monoxide may cause headache, nausea, dizzi- ness, weakness, rapid breathing, unconsciousness, and death. High concentrations may be rapidly fatal without producing significant warning symptoms. Exposure to this gas may aggravate heart disease and artery disease and may cause chest pain in those with pre - existing heart disease. Pregnant women are more susceptible to the effects of carbon monoxide exposure. The effects are also more severe in people who are working hard and in people who are working in places where the temperature is high or at altitudes above 2,000 feet. Skin exposure to liquid carbon monoxide may cause frost- bite -type burns. • Reporting signs and symptoms A physician should be contacted if anyone develops any signs or symptoms and suspects that they are caused by exposure to carbon monoxide. • Recommended medical surveillance The following medical procedures should be made available to each employee who is exposed to carbon monoxide at potentially hazardous levels: 1. Initial Medical Examination: —A complete history and physical examination: The purpose is to detect pre- existing conditions that might place the exposed employee at increased risk, and to establish a baseline for future health monitoring. Per- sons with a history of coronary heart disease, anemia, pulmonary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, thyr- otoxicosis, and smokers would be expected to be at increased risk from exposure. Pregnant women have an increased sensitivity to the effects of carbon monoxide. Examination of the cardiovascular system, the pulmon- ary system, the blood, and the central nervous system should be stressed. —A complete blood count: Carbon monoxide affects the ability of the blood to carry oxygen. A complete blood count should be performed including a red cell count, a white cell count, a differential count of a stained smear, as well as hemoglobin and hematocrit. 2. Periodic Medical Examination: The aforementioned medical examinations should be repeated on an annual basis, with the exception that a carboxyhemoglobin determination should be performed at any time overex- posure is suspected or signs or symptoms of toxicity occur. These recommendations reflect good industrial hygiene and medical surveillance practices and their implementation will assist in achieving an effective occupational health program. However, they may not be sufficient to achieve compliance with all requirements of OSHA regulations. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Public Health Service Centers for Disease Control Occupational Safety and Health Administration National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health September 1978 r t I o Summary of toxicology Carbon monoxide (CO) gas causes tissue hypoxia by preventing the blood from carrying sufficient oxygen. CO combines reversibly with the oxygen- carrying sites on the hemoglobin molecule with an affinity ranging from 210 to 240 times greater than that of oxygen; the carboxyhemoglobin thus formed is unavailable to carry oxygen. In addition, carboxyhemoglobin interferes with the release of oxygen carried by unaltered hemoglobin. With exposure to high concentrations such as 4000 ppm and above, transient weakness and dizziness may be the only premonitory warnings before coma supervenes; the most common early aftermath of severe intoxication is cerebral edema. Exposure to concentrations of 500 to 1000 ppm causes the development of headache, tachyp- nea (rapid breathing), nausea, weakness, dizziness, mental confusion, and in some instances, hallucinations, and may result in brain damage. The affected person is commonly cyanotic. Concentrations as low as 50 ppm result in blood COHb levels up to 10% in an 8 -hour day. This greatly increases the risk of angina pectoris and coronary infarctions by decreasing the oxygen supply in the blood and also in the myoglobin of the heart muscle. These effects are aggravated by heavy work, high ambient temperatures, and high altitudes. Pregnant women are especially susceptible to the effects of increased CO levels. Smoking also increases the risk: cigarette smoke contains 4% CO, which results in 5.9% COHb if a pack a day is smoked. The blood of persons not exposed to CO contains about I% CO, probably as a result of normal heme metabolism. The diagnosis of CO intoxication depends primarily on the demonstration of significantly increased carboxyhemoglobin in the blood. Levels over 60% are usually fatal; 40% is associated with collapse and syncope; above 25% there may be electrocardiographic evidence of a depression of the S -T segment; between 15% and 25% there may be headache and nausea. The reaction to a given blood level of carboxyhemoglobin is extremely variable: some persons may be in coma with a carboxyhemoglobin level of 38% while others may maintain an apparently clear sensorium with levels as high as 55 %. The blood of cigarette smokers contains 3 to 10% carboxyhemog- lobin, and nonexposed persons have an average level of 1 %, probably as a result of normal heme metabolism. Several investigators have suggested that the results of behavioral tests such as time discrimination, visual vigilance, choice response tests, visual evoked re- sponses, and visual discrimination thresholds may be altered at levels of carboxyhemoglobin below 5 %. L- CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES • Physical data 1. Molecular weight: 28 2. Boiling point (760 mm Hg): —191.5 C ( -313 F) 3. Specific gravity (water = 1): 0.79 (liquid at boiling point) 4. Vapor density (air = 1 at boiling point of carbon 2 Carbon Monoxide monoxide): 0.97 5. Melting point: —199 C ( -326 F) 6. Vapor pressure at 20 C (68 F): Greater than 1 atmosphere 7. Solubility in water, g/100 g water at 20 C (68 F): 0.004 8. Evaporation rate (butyl acetate = 1): Not applica- ble • Reactivity 1. Conditions contributing to instability: Elevated temperatures may cause cylinders to explode. 2. Incompatibilities: Contact with strong oxidizers may cause fires and explosions. 3. Hazardous decomposition products: None 4. Special precautions: None • Flammability 1. Flash point: Not applicable 2. Autoignition temperature: 609 C (1128 F) 3. Flammable limits in air, % by volume: Lower: 12.5; Upper: 74 4. Extinguishant: Dry chemical. If flow of gas cannot be stopped, let fire burn. • Warning properties 1. Odor Threshold: The AIHA Hygienic Guide points out that carbon monoxide is odorless. 2. Eye Irritation Level: Grant states that carbon monoxide is a non - irritating gas. 3. Evaluation of Warning Properties: Carbon mon- oxide is an odorless, non - irritating gas. It has no warn- ing properties. MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES • Eight -Hour Exposure Evaluation Measurements to determine employee exposure arc best taken so that the average eight -hour exposure is based on a single eight -hour sample or on two four -hour samples. Several short -time interval samples (up to 30 minutes) may also be used to determine the average exposure level. Air samples should be taken in the employee's breathing zone (air that would most nearly represent that inhaled by the employee). • Ceiling Evaluation Measurements to determine employee ceiling exposure are best taken during periods of maximum expected airborne concentrations of carbon monoxide. Each measurement should consist of a fifteen (15) minute sample or series of consecutive samples totalling fifteen (15) minutes in the employee's breathing zone (air that would most rearly represent that inhaled by the em- ployee). A minimum of three (3) measurements should be taken on one work shift and the highest of all measurements taken is an estimate of the employee's exposure. • Method Sampling and analyses may be performed by collection of carbon monoxide vapors using an adsorption tube with a subsequent chemical analysis of the adsorption September 1978 r r I i L tube. Also, detector tubes certified by NIOSH under 42 CFR Part 84 or other direct - reading devices calibrated to measure carbon monoxide may be used. An analyt- ical method for carbon monoxide is in the NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, 2nd Ed., Vol. 4, 1978, available from the Government Printing Office, Wash- ington, D.C. 20402 (GPO No. 017 - 033 - 00317 -3). RESPIRATORS • Good industrial hygiene practices recommend that engineering controls be used to reduce environmental concentrations to the permissible exposure level. How- ever, there are some exceptions where respirators may be used to control exposure. Respirators may be used when engineering and work practice controls are not technically feasible, when such controls are in the process of being installed, or when they fail and need to be supplemented. Respirators may also be used for operations which require entry into tanks or closed vessels, and in emergency situations. If the use of respirators is necessary, the only respirators permitted are those that have been approved by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (formerly Mining Enforce- ment and Safety Administration) or by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. • In addition to respirator selection, a complete respira- tory protection program should be instituted which includes regular training, maintenance, inspection, cleaning, and evaluation. PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT • Employees should be provided with and required to use impervious clothing, gloves, face shields (eight -inch minimum), and other appropriate protective clothing necessary to, prevent the skin from becoming frozen from contact with liquid carbon monoxide or from contact with vessels containing liquid carbon monoxide. • Any clothing which becomes wet with, liquid carbon monoxide should be removed immediately and not reworn until the carbon monoxide has evaporated. • Employees should be provided with and required to use splash -proof safety goggles where liquid carbon monoxide may contact the eyes. COMMON OPERATIONS AND CONTROLS The following list includes some common operations in which exposure to carbon monoxide may occur and control methods which may be effective in each case: September 1978 Operation Controls Liberation from Local exhaust emissions in enclosed ventilation; respiratory places from exhaust protective device fumes of internal combustion engines; from metallurgic industry and foundries; from chemical industry for synthesis and emission as result of incomplete combustion Liberation during Local exhaust acetylere welding; from ventilation; respiratory enclosed areas as protective device mines or tunnels; from fire -damp explosions Liberation from Local exhaust industrial heating ventilation EMERGENCY FIRST AID PROCEDURES In the event of an emergency, institute first aid proce- dures and send for first aid or medical assistance. • Breathing If a person breathes in large amounts of carbon monox- ide, move the exposed person to fresh air at once. If breathing has stopped, perform artificial respiration. Keep the affected person warm and at rest. Get medical attention as soon as possible. • Rescue Move the affected person from the hazardous exposure. If the exposed person has been overcome, notify some- one else and put into effect the established emergency rescue procedures. Do not become a casualty. Under- stand the facility's emergency rescue procedures and know the locations of rescue equipment before the need arises. LEAK PROCEDURES • Persons not wearing protective equipment and cloth- ing should be restricted from areas of leaks or releases until cleanup has been completed. • If carbon monoxide is leaked or released in hazardous concentrations, the following steps should be taken: 1. Ventilate area of leak or release to disperse gas. 2. Stop flow of gas. If source of leak is a cylinder and the leak cannot be stopped inplace, remove the leaking -cylinder to a safe place in the open air, and repair the leak or allow the cylinder to empty. Carbon Monoxide 3 L r REFERENCES • American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists: "Carbon Monoxide," Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Substances in Workroom Air (3rd ed., 2nd printing), Cincinnati, 1974. • American Industrial Hygiene Association: "Carbon Monoxide," Hygienic Guide Series, Detroit, Michigan, 1965. • Community Air Quality Guides: "Carbon Monox- ide," American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 30:322 -325, 1969. • Goldsmith, J. R., and Aronow, W. S.: "Carbon Monoxide and Coronary Heart Disease: A Review," Environmental Research, 10:236 -248, 1975. • Goodman, L. S., and Gilman, A.: The Pharmacologi- cal Basis of Therapeutics (5th ed.), Macmillan, New York, 1975. • Grant, W. M.: Toxicology of the Eye (2nd ed.), C. C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1974. * National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare: Criteria for a Recommended Standard .. . . Occupational Exposure to Carbon lblonoxide, HEW Pub- lication No. HSM 73- 11000, GPO No. 017- 033 - 00006, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972. • Patty, F. A. (ed.): Toxicology, Vol. II of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology (2nd ed. rev.), Interscience, New York, 1963. Sax, N. I.: Dangerous Properties of Industrial ival eriaLs (3rd ed.), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1968. • Zenz, C.: Occupational Medicine - Principles and Practical Applications, Year Book Medical, inc., Chica- go, 1975. RESPIRATORY PROTECTION FOR CARBON MONOXIDE Condition Minimum Respiratory Protection* Required Above 50 ppm Gas Concentration 500 ppm or less Any supplied -air respirator. Any self- contained breathing apparatus. 1500 ppm or less Any supplied -air respirator with a full facepiece, helmet, or hood. Any self- contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece. A Type C supplied -air respirator operated in pressure- demand or other positive pressure or continuous -flow mode. Greater than 1500 ppm or Self- contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece operated in pressure - entry and escape from demand or other positive pressure mode. unknown concentrations A combination respirator which includes a Type C supplied -air respirator with a full facepiece operated in pressure- demand or other positive pressure or continu- ous -flow mode and an auxiliary self- contained breathing apparatus operated in pressure- demand or other positive pressure mode. Fire Fighting Self- contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece operated in pressure - demand or other positive pressure mode. Escape Any gas mask providing protection against carbon monoxide. Any escape self- contained breathing apparatus *Only NIOSH- approved or MSHA- approved equipment should be used. 4 Carbon Monoxide September 1978 ' Ov ,= % r i i i References: 1. Fairhill, L.T.: Industrial Toxicology, p. 181, Baltimore, MD (1957). 2. Vigliani, E.C.: Brit. /. Ind. Med. 11:235 (1954). 1. Idem.: Ind. Med. & Surg. 19.240 (1950). 4. Paluch, E.A.: J. Ind. Hyg. & Tox. 3Q37 (1948). S. Warow, P., Colleau, P., Meignie, S.: Arch. d. Mal. Prof. 25:348 (1964). 6. Jindrichova, J., Simko, A.: Arch. Gewerbepath, u. Gewerbeh- yg• 23:72 (1967). 7. Nesswelha, L., Nesswelha, W.: roxk:uk)gy of Carbon uisul- fide, H. Brieger & J. Teisinger, Eds.,'p. 214, Excerpta Medical Foundation, Amsterdam, Holland (1967). 8. Toyama, T., Sakurai, H.L.: Ibid. p. 197. 9. Gordi, S.T., Trumper, M.: /. Am. Med. Assoc. 110.1543 (1938). 10. Lewey, F.H.: Ann. Int. Med. 75:869 (1941). 11. Barthelemy, H.L.: J. Ind. Hyg. & Tox. 21:141 (1939). 12. Rubin, H.H., Arieff, A.J., Tauber, F.W.: Arch. Ind. Hyg. & Occ. Med. 2.529 (1950). 13. Kleinfeld, M., Tabershaw, I.R.: J. Ain. Med. Assoc. 159:667 (1955). - 14. Mihail, J. et al. Arch. Mal. Prof. 29.109 (1968). 15. Teisinger, J.: Private communication. 16. Wiley, F.H., Hueper, W.D., von Oettingen, W.F.: /. Ind. Hyg. & Tox. 18:733 (1936). 17. Scheel, L.D.: Toxicology of Carbon Disulfide, Brieger & Ties - inger. . 18. Hernberg, S. et al. Work - Envir. I-111h. 10.93 ('1973). CARBON MONOXIDE CO TLV, 50 ppm ( 55 mg /m3) STEL, 400 ppm ( 440 mg /m3) Carbon monoxide is a colorless, practically odorless gas, which condenses at -190° C and freezes al -207° C. It is flammable with a lowerexplosive limit in air of 12.5 %. Its molecular weight of 28.01 gives it a density practically the same as that of nitrogen, slightly less than that of air. Spar- ingly soluble in water (3.3 mL 1100 mL of H2O at 0° Q. CO is an ingredient of gaseous fuels (producer gas, wa- ter gas) which have been largely replaced by natural gas. It is chiefly encountered as a product of incomplete combus- tion of almost any carbonaceous material, especially in the exhausts of internal combustion engines. High concentra- tions are frequently encountered in blast furnace opera- tions in the steel industry. Space heaters, improperly ad- justed oil or gas burners and fires in buildings are also imporant sources of carbon monoxide exposure. Carbon monoxide is a chemical asphyxiant gas whose primary toxic action is a direct result of the hypoxia pro- duced by a given exposure. It rapidly diffuses across the alveolar membrane and is reversibly bound to one of the herne proleins. 80 -cYj% complexes with hemoglobin result - ig in a reduction in the oxygen - carrying capacity of the alood. The remainder of the CO binds with myoglobin, cytochrome oxidase, cytochrome P -450 and the hydroper- oxidases. 72 19. Tolonen, M. et al: Brit. 1. Ind. Med. 32:1 (1975). 20. Seppalainen, A.M., Tolonen, M.: Work - Envir. 1-11th. Scand. 1. 17:145 (1974). 21. Raitta, C. et al: Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophthal. 191:151 (1974). 22. Tolonen, M.: Scand. /. Work -Envr. Hlth. 1:63 (1975). 23. Stokinger, H.Ez, Mountain, J.T., Scheel, L.D.: Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. '151: art 2, 9611 (1968). 24. Diuric, D. et al: Presented al XVII Int'I Cong. Occup. H/111, Buenos Aires (September 17 -24, 1972). 25. Calhoun, J.A.: Memorandum to Dr. L.D. Scheel (April 2, 1968). 26. Research on Chernieal (blurs, Put I -- Odor lhrechohlc for 5.1 Commercial Chemicals, Manufacturing Chemists Assoc., Washington, DC (October 1968). 27. NIOSH: Criteria fora Recommended Standard-Occupation- al Exposure to Carbon Disulfide, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 77 -156 (1977). 28. Hernberg, S. et al: Brit. 1. Ind. Med. 27:313 (1970). Cited in ref. 27. 29. Gavrilescu, N., Lilis, R.: Toxicology of Carbon Disulfide, Fl. Brieger & J. Teisinger, Eds., p. 165, Excerpta Medical Founda'- lion, Amsterdam (1967). 30. Tiller, J.R. et jl: Brit. Med. /. 4:407 (1968). Cited in ref. 27. 31. Hernberg, S. et al: Work Environ. Health 2:27 (1976). Ibid. 32. Cirla, A.M.: Mod. Lay. 63:431 (1972). Ibid. 33. Raitta, D., Tolonen, M.: Arch. Klin. Exp. Ophihalrnol. 195:149 (1975). Ibid. 34. Seppalainen, A.M. et al: Work Environ. Health 91:71 (1972). Ibid. 35. Vasileseu, C.: Rev. Rouyn. Ncurol. 963 (1972). Ibid. A small amount of CC) is produced endogencously, mainly from the catabolism of hemoglobin. In healthy male subjects as rest, the average rate of endogenous CO pro- duction is approximately 0.4 mL /hr resulting in a carboxy- hemoglobin (COHb) saturation of 0.4 -0.7 %.0I Hypermela- holism, certain drugs and hemolytic anemia can increase the endogenous production of COHb to 4- 6 %.I2I Tobacco smokers are the most heavily exposed, non- industrial segment of the population.h► COHb saturations in this group range from 4 -20% with a mean for one -pack- per -day consumers of 5- 6 %.(3) Each molecule of CO combining with hemoglobin re- duces the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood and exerts a finite stress on man. Thus, it may be reasoned that there is no dose of CO that is not without an effect on the body. Whether that effect is physiologic or harmful depends upon the close of CO and the state of health of the ex- posed individual. The body compensates for this hypoxic stress by increasing cardiac output and blood flow to spe- cific organs, such as the brain or the heart. When this abili- (y to compensate is overpowered or is limited by disease, tissue injury results. The absorption and elimination of CO is mathamalically described by the equation of Coburn et al, which takes into account such important variables as duration of expo- sure, alveolar ventilation, partial pressure of CO in the in- haled air, blood volume, barametric pressure, diffusivity of the lung for CO, rate of endogenous CO production, aver- age partial pressure of oxygen in the lung and capillaries and the exact ratio of the affinity of blood for CO.I4.5) Of these variable CO concentration, duration of exposure, I and alveolar ventilation are the most influential in de- termining COHb saturation. Exposure to CO sufficient to produce COHb saturations in the 3 -5% range impairs cardiovascular function in pa- tients with cardiovascular disease(6.72) and in normal sub - jects.t13-15► COHb saturations in the 4 -6% range have been shown to significantly reduce the ventricular fibrillation threshold in both normal, anesthetized dogs and those with acute myocardial injury.(16) These levels also increase myocardial ischemia associated with acute myocardial in- farction in dogs.0') The question of significant changes in mental function produced by COHb saturation between 2 -5% is controver- sial at this time and has been recently reviewed.j18) It does appear that an abrupt elevation of COHb saturation to 5% will transiently alter the visual light threshold.11'42u) In the industrial setting, the ability to perform complex tasks re- quiring both judgment and motor coordination is not af- fected adversely by saturations below 10 %.08) A threshold limit value for carbon monoxide of '100 ppm has been extant for many years, but no substantial justifica- tion for its validity under ordinary circumstances of work can be found. The often quoted work of Henderson and Haggard,(21) slates that a three -hour exposure at 100 ppm produces no effect, but six hours' exposure produces a per- ceptible effect and nine hours' exposure causes headache and nausea. Drinker(22) states that the safety constant must be reduced to 1/3 or less under exercise or work. The Com- mittee believes that the apparent success of the 100 ppm value was due to inurement and accumulation of individ- uals of low degree of susceptibility. A great deal of confu- sion has resulted over the years from the summation of thousands of publications on the effects of carbon monox- ide on man because of serious difficulty in the determina- tion of low levels of the compound in air and blood. It now seems reasonably certain that an equilibrium exposure of man at 50 ppm of carbon monoxide will result in a HhCO value of 8 -10 %, and that under usual conditions of work and rest periods an "end of work day" level of 5 -6% would be expected. A crew of workers in the Holland Tunnel who worked two hours in, and two hours out, for eight -hour "swing" shifts in an average tunnel CO concentration of 70 ppm showed an average of 5% HbCO with no one above 10 %. Under this average exposure of 25 -50 ppm, no symp- toms or health impairments were found,(23) or would be expected. Men exposed continuously for many days in a subma- rine at 50 ppm CO complained of headache but a 60 -day exposure at 40 ppm CO was without effect.(24) Schulle(25) stated that exposure at 100 ppm of CO for over four hours is excessive and recommends a maximal exposure at 50 ppm CO for over four hours' duration. Studies made upon a group of healthy young men ex- posed for a prolonged period at 44 ppm CO produced no adverse reactions on their general health.jl6► The recommended TLV of 50 ppm is a concentration that should not result in blood CO levels above 10 %, which might cause signs and symptoms of borderline effects.(21) The primary effect of exposure to low concentrations of CO on workmen results from the hypoxic stress secondary to the reduction in the oxygen - carrying capacity of Blood. Healthy workmen are exquisitely sensitive to such stresses and immediately compensate by increasing cardiac omput and flow to critical organs. However, workmen with signif- icant disease, both detected and undetected may not he able to compensate adequately and are at risk of serious injury. For such workers a TLV of 25 ppm, an air concentra- tion that should not result in blood COHb saturations above 4 %, might be necessary. Even such a concentration might be detrimental to the health of some workers who might have far advanced cardiovascular disease. To protect workers with chronic heart disease NIOSH, in its criteria document for CO,(28) recommends a work en- vironment standard of _15 ppm as a I WA, with a coiling (ii 200 ppm. Much of the evidence on which this recommen- dation is based is derived from studies of cigarette smokers.(2 ") It would appear to the Committee that the TLV of 50 ppm might also be too high under conditions of heavy labor, high temperatures, or at high elevations (over 5000 feet above sea level). For the great majority of workers, however, exposure to carbon monoxide at concentrations helow 50 ppm, under a wide range of working conditions, should not result in either mild temporary distress or per- manent impairment of health. The Committee also sug- gests a STEI. of 400 ppm. Other recommendations: Australia, Finland, West Ger- many, Belgium, Holland, Switzerland, Yugoslavia have adopted the 50 ppm TLV; Sweden, 35 ppm; East Germany, 30 ppm: Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, 26 ppm; Bulgaria, USSR, "17 ppm. References: 1. Sjostrand, T.: Scand. /. Clin. Lab. Invest. 1:201 -214 (1949). 2. Coburn, R.F.: New Eng. /. Mad. 782:207 -209 (1970). 3. Stewart, R.D., Barella, E.D., Platte, L.R. et al: /AMA 22 ?-I 1!57- 1195 (1974). 4. Coburn, R.F., Forster, R.E., Kane, P.O.: /. Clin. Invest: 44:1899- 1910 (1965). _ 5. Peterson, J.E., Stewart, R.D.: /. Appl. Physiol. 39:633 -638 (1975). 6. Ayers, S.M., Gianelli, S. Jr., Mueller, H.S.: Ann. N.Y. Adad. Sci. 147:268 -293 (1970). 7. Aronow, W.S., Rokaw, S.N.: Circulation 44:782 -788 (1971). 8. Aronow, W.S., Harris, C.N., Isbell, M.W., Rokaw, S.N., Impara- to, B.: Ann. Intern. Med. 77:669 -676 (1972). .9. Anderson, E.W., Andelman, R.J., Strauch, J.M., Fortuin, N.J., Knelson, J.H.: Ibid. 79:46 -50 (1973). 10. Aronow, W.S., Isbell, M.W.: Ibid., pp. 392 -395. 11. Aronow, W.S., Stemmer, E.A., Isbell, M.W.: Circulation 49: 415 -417 (1974). 12. Aronow, W.S., Cassidy, J., Vangrow, J.S., March, H., Kern, J.C., Goldsmith, J.R., Khemka, M., Pagano, J., Vawter, M.: Ibid. 50. 340 -347 (1974). 13. Ekblom, B., Huot, R.: Acta Physiol. Scand. 86:474 -482 (1972). 14. Drinkwater, B.L., Raven, P.B., Harvath, S.M., Gliner, J.A., Ruh - lin, R.O., Boldman, N.W., Taguchi, S.: Arch. Env. Health 28: 177 -181 (1974). 15. Aronow, W.S., Cassidy, J.: Ann. Intern. Med. 83:496 -499 (1975). 16. Aronow, W.S., Stemmer, E.A., Zweig, S.: Arch. Env. Health 34: 184 -186 (1979). 17. Becker, L.C.: Ibid., pp. 274 -279. 18. Stewart, R.D.: /. Occup. Med. 18:304 -309 (1976). 19. McFarland, R.A., Roughton, F.J.W., Halperin, M.H., Niven, J.I.: /. Aviation Med. 15:381 -394 (1944). 73 i .. %%,, 00- l t Nftfol TABLE 1 Toxic Effect end Carboxyhemcglobin Levels produced by Various Carbon ?Monoxide Exposures -�-= a ell R+S OW f)4z o l- ha R CU tj+n- m ( N iq N Pc:R rnlA_J-.toA/ Fri-R+6; aF A cz IDY voter -na . N 1 0 0 IQUVAMtIt CO Concentration (yym) P Percent end Duration C CO M L Loxic Effect 30 - 8 8 Hours 5 5 -10 N No vMtoms detectable, some sub- jects may show errors in judgment - psychomotor tasks. 50 - 8 8 Hours 7 7 -10 S Slight headache in game uubjects. 100 - 8 8 Hours 1 10-20 H Headache, shortness of breath upon exertion. 300 - 4 4 Hours 3 30-50 S Severe headache, dizziness, fatigue, nausea, collapse. 1500 - 1 1 Hour 5 50-70 S Severe headache, confusion, uneon- �: s seiousness, depressed life signs, possibly fatal if exposure continues. 5000 - 1 10 Minutes 7 70-80 U Unconsciousness within minutes, fatal within 10-15 minutes. a ell R+S OW f)4z o l- ha R CU tj+n- m ( N iq N Pc:R rnlA_J-.toA/ Fri-R+6; aF A cz IDY voter -na . N 1 0 0 IQUVAMtIt N 1 0 0 IQUVAMtIt DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY H 320 Washington Av. South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343-8468 ��.•� LFU 935 -3381 TTY-935-6433 July 22, 1985 Mr.. Gene Bartz City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55425 Dear Mr. Bartz: This letter is to confirm that the city of Edina garage at 5146 Eden Ave. S. was visited on July 19, 1985, by Loren Janson of Hennepin County Department of Environment and Energy. The company was represented by yourself. The purpose of the site visit was to determine compliance with applicable county and state hazardous waste rules (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Hazardous Waste Chapter 7045). At the time of the visit it appeared that this company is in compliance with the intent of those rules. Sincerely, Loren Janson l Environmentalist W :bl cc: Gregory B. Lie Gary Syr MP(A. • HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer HAZARDOUS WASTES AND EDINA Introduction The problems associated with hazardous waste were virtually unknown ten years ago, but in a remarkably short period of time they have climbed to the top of the concern ladder for the American people. According to government estimates, more than 80 billion pounds of toxic waste are dumped in the United States each year. The problem not only persists, it is growing. The EPA believes that • approximately 90% of the wastes disposed of each year are dumped in an irresponsible and environmentally unsafe manner. The American people, however, are demanding that the toxic °waste problem be solved, even if the clean -up turns out to be expensive. In growing numbers they understand that the cost of ignoring the problem will exceed by a thousand fold the cost of facing it now. Hazardous Materials Use and Disposal in Edina Public Works Department I. What potentially hazardous chemicals are being used by the Public Works Department and how are they discarded? Salt - Between 5 and 10 percent mixture of salt to sand is used on our streets as a de -ice. While some of the salt dissolves out and runs down the sewer, most is swept -up and disposed of in the land- fill. It should be noted that by the time this mixture reaches - the landfill, the percentage of salt content. is reduced considerably. Old Engine Oil- All of our old engine oil is recovered in drums and sold at 25t per gallon. Little or no oil escapes our recovery program. Cleaning Fluids (for parts) - This fluid, when used, is added to the engine oil and sold at the same price. None.of this material eludes the recycling system. Paint - Whenever possible, the Public Works Department uses latex paints as opposed to oil based paints to eliminate problems of disposal. Latex paint brushes and other equipment can be merely washed out with soap and water. Our oil base paint is recycled in every instance. A yellow paint gun is cleaned with naphtha, the entire solution is saved, and the next time yellow is used, the same solution is used for cleaning. w Hazardous Wastes & Edina Page 2 When it becomes necessary to dispose of any naphtha or paint solution, we have made arrangements with Merit Supply Company to pick it up at no cost to the city. Naphtha (cleaning solution) - The cleaning solutions are all recycled as much as possible and then disposed of in the same manner as paint. Gas - The city has tanks of regular gasoline, unleaded gasoline, and diesel fuel buried beneath the property of the Public Works Building. Periodically, soil tests are made to detect any leakage from these tanks. No leakage has been detected thus far. The tank holding the "Regular Gasoline" is a 40,000 gallon tank. Any leakage in this tank would cause tremendous environmental damage. it is estimated, however, that within two years regular gas will not be available. This will eliminate that potential danger. 2. Are any of the hazardous chemicals inadvertantly dumped out on the ground? Obviously, some of the salt -sand mixture will make its way on to lawns because of the street plowing that occurs over the winter. Latex Paint is sometimes sprayed on the ground in the process of c eaning out spray guns and other equipment. This paint however, is water soluable. Other than with these two materials, a conscientious effort is made to recycle or otherwise dispose of hazardous materials in an environ- mentally sound method. 3. Have employees been properly informed as to the handling of hazardous chemicals? All employees have been informed as to the use, the handling, and the disposal of potentially hazardous materials. This information has been dispersed in a variety of ways: workshops, seminars, bulletins, and personal contact. Hazardous Wastes & Edina Page 3 Park and Recreation Department 1. What potentially hazardous chemicals are being used by the City of Edina? Weed Killers (Herbicides) * 2 -4D Amine Salt Base - This is the weakest of all the 2 -4D com- pounds. The Park Department does not use 2 -4D,5T which is the most toxic of herbicides. 2 -4D,5T has been known to induce cancer and birth defects in experimental animals. The salt base however, attacks only broad leaf plants. * Round -up - This a vegetation irradicator that will hold its potency for just one growing season. It is generally used on baseball diamond and around guard rail posts. It is toxic to fish, but generally not to land animals. Insecticides * Sevin - This is a.water soluable compound that is used in control of mosquitoes and other insects that affect tree life. 2. Is any of the hazardous chemical inadvertantly dumped out on the ground? With the exception of the salt (covered above), no chemicals are dumped out on the ground in concentrated amounts. All chemicals are kept, whether mixed or unmixed, until the next season. 3. Have employees been properly informed as to the handling of hazardous chemicals? According to the Park Foreman, nearly all of his subordinantes have attended workshops and seminars in the "Handling of Hazardous Chemicals ". These workshops have been held at the University of Minnesota, Earl Brown Education Center or the County Agricultural Office. rnnrliminnc As chemicals can pose a major threat to our soils and groundwater, it behooves every municipality to be cognizant of the dangers involved with their use. Expanded uses of herbicides and insecticides present a constant contamination risk. The City of Edina has steadily curtailed the amount of chemicals used as well as application rates. It is our belief that-our constant vigilance on this matter will be of benefit to future efforts of this city. a LOSS CONTROL �- REPORT TO MANAGEMENT � EDINA OFFICE CENTER 812921:,, ^,00 7600 FRANCE AVE. S., P.O. BOX 35827 March 6 1987 MINNEAPOLIS,.MI 1NESOTA 55435 i Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Ms. Smith Loss Control Service Visit February 26, 1987 - City Hall This letter will confirm our visit during which we focused our attention on the following: - Mandatory eye protection for City employees. - Employee safety and Right To Know Retraining - Carbon monoxide sampling results from the Fire Department and Public Works Department. LOSS REVIEW: A review of Worker's Compensation and automobile losses for the policy year 1986 -87 was conducted. Automobile losses looked excellent with only one preventable accident during this period, and five non - preventable as a result of other vehicles hitting City vehicles. For the policy year 1986 there have been a total of 36 employee injuries, approximately ten of which were first aid only, for the total amount paid as of 3 -1 -87 of $6,308.00 with $25,371.00 in reserves. The largest claim accountable for approximately $15,000.00 in reserves is the one involving an employee who was flooding an ice rink who fell and injured his neck resulting in over a month lost time. We reviewed the type of footwear being utilized, and although it has been suggested that the employees wear grips or spike -type shoes when flooding rinks Important Notice The Home services described herein are offered to assist insureds in meeting their legal obligation to maintain a safe place to work. The services offered do not claim to find or include every loss potential, code violation or exception to good practice. but relate only to those hazards specifically commented on and described in our recommendations or reports. It remains your responsibility to remedy any hazardous conditions on your property. n ',]`13 ? :fin. .93 Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina because of the slippery conditions, it 'is not a requirement. Because of that I am detailing a recommendation in reference to requiring this. In general the other losses were very light for the past year, however, I would emphasize that there have been three eye injuries. in the past year within various departments. That would bring a total of 13 eye injuries for the past two years. ACTIVITIES AND CONCLUSIONS We reviewed that the mandatory eye protection program is in its final stages with vendors being contacted at this time for supplying safety glasses as well as prescription glasses when appropriate. It was also found that additional retraining of employees during the Summer orientation period is planned. This will become an annual retraining event for all employees rather than just Summer employees. Items that will be included will be general safety rules and regulations, Employee Right To Know, CPR, first aid and accident reporting techniques. This may be a good time to emphasize to employees that information referencing the Industrial Hygiene Report for carbon monoxide sampling in the Public Works Department, as well as to emphasize proper axle investigation techniques within the Public Works Department. We briefly reviewed the carbon monoxide results within the Public Works Department as well as the Fire Department. A detailed report on the Fire Department should be available to you within the next week discussing the results and recommendations in reference to it. We also reviewed at this time the claim that is in the process of being filed in reference to an employee who is experiencing respiratory. problems within the Public Works garage. The additional information that we reviewed at this visit will be forwarded to our Claims Department for their review. We also discussed the status of previous recommendations made at the ice arena and golf course. I am forwarding letters to Mr. John Vallery and Larry Their for their review. I am asking that a 30 day response be made on the status of these recommendations. I would also ask -your assistance in following up with them on their status. -2- Ms. Cecelia Smith Assistant to City Manager City of Edina The next scheduled service visit for the City of Edina is in April of 1987. As you are aware, a new Loss Control Representative will be conducting that survey. Areas that will be addressed will be the mandatory eye protection program, the above - captioned recommendations, as well as the status of the recommendations made in the Industrial Hygiene surveys of the Fire Department and Public Works Department. It has been a pleasure working with the City of Edina for the past several years, and I hope that your continued efforts and enthusiasm toward loss control continues. Btst of luck. Very truly yours, ��0 Joanne Laney Technical Specialist Industrial Hygiene Loss Control Department cc: Ms. Dianne Julien Personnel Department City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mr. William Homeyer Harris- Homeyer, Incorporated 6161 Wooddale Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota 55424 -4- INDUSTRIA cciDENT SUMMARY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT IN.uwaua NAM% LOCATION iDII�i��r�r��� PERIOD COVEREDp t•Y�a�i`t•�I�I�I�1iYfY City of Edina I All Departments u i p Opera L 71/86 '� 2/27/87 rROM TO STRUCK ACCIDENT TYPE CAUGHT IN, ON ABRADED, CUT OR STRUCK BY FALLS SPRAINS AND MISCELLANEOUS AGAINST OR BETWEEN PUNCTURED STRAINS CONTACT A �4 �4 ` ¢ Ab V • b' Obb ` A.' g� � ` 30 4 yV V 4 /y Ob �� �? b ! b? O• 4= 4 ,�� ! f � b1b by O b W • _ • O O • t� O r ? •` �� O, f 4f ? • 4 Z• :• fir! ; �� AT 04 b= 44 Wdw-K..11mg!L=12 . m rrr�>. r�r�` iDII�i��r�r��� t•Y�a�i`t•�I�I�I�1iYfY u i p Opera I _ ... _ . s■■ s■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ e■■s■ ■ ■©■ ■■■■■ . . _ . ■■■ e■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■■■■ s■■ ■■■■■ P. s■e■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■es■■■■■■■- ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■e■■■■■■ Bldg . _ . ■■■ ■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■ ■■■■■ mmmmmmm■ Mechanic ■■■■■e■■■ ■■■■■■■■■■ ■■■e■■■■■ mmmmmmm MMEMMEMMMM■ mmmmmmmmn e■ ■ ■■e ■ ■■■ ■e■ ©s■■■ ■■gee ■ee■■■ee�■ TYPE TOTAL H 3075 (F) 7/66 - c1 VEHICULAR ACCIDENT SUMMARY THE HOME INSURANCE COMPANIES INSUREDS NAME City of Edina POLICY NUMBER BA996031 EXPIRATION DATE 7/1/87 RINCIPAL OFFICE ADDRESS 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota AGENCY Harris - Homeyer PRODUCING OFFICE Mpls. SUMMARY OF (LOCATIONI All Departments PERIOD COVERED FROM 7/1/86 TO 2/27/87 CLAIM OCC, CODE TYPE OF ACCIDENT PREVENT- ABLE NON PRE- VENTA BLE DOUBT- FU PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY TOTAL REMARKS IM EN TIOX OUTSTANDING CAUSES) 001 INTERSECTION COLLISION 1 1 1 Public works - other slid 002 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE AHEAD 1 1 1 Sweeper - backed into 003 HEAD ON COLLISION 1 1 1 1 Fire - Pumper hit responding 004 COLLISION WITH VEHICLE BEHIND 1 1 1 rearen ing City Hall -by other' 005 SIDESWIPE - PASSING 006 SIDESWIPE -BEING PASSED 007 HIT PARKED VEHICLE 1 1 Police - backing 008 HIT WHILE PARKED 1 1 1 other Public Works - backing 009 HIT PEDESTRIAN 010 COLLISION WITH FIXED OBJECT 011 COLLISION WITH OTHER OBJECT 012 OVERTURNED 013 RAN OFF ROADWAY 014 LOADING OR UNLOADING 015 EQUIPMENT FAILURE 016 FIRE 017 GLASS BREAKAGE 018 TOTAL THEFT 019 PARTIAL THEFT 020 AUTO GARAGE CLAIMS 021 ALL OTHER TOTAL 1 5 0 5 1 1 6 DITIONAL HEMARKS H 3070 IF) 3 /73 ,J DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING J .r .. DISASTER RECOVERY PLANNING I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES A. Development of a disaster recovery plan will require a substantial amount of time on the part of many people. The decision to develop such a plan, therefore, should be made by senior management and the fact that they consider the plan to be of major importance must be communicated to all persons involved. B. All Members of the disaster recovery team, with alternates, should be named specifically and should participate actively in developing or auditing all phases of the recovery plan. The enforced discipline of thinking completely through the plan prior to an emergency can be more important than the plan document itself. C. The responsibilities of each recovery team member should be spelled out in detail. Emergency authority, if different from that normally granted, must accompany assigned responsibilities. D. The plan must be completely reviewed at regular intervals, probably quarterly, and brought current in all aspects in order to maintain its value. E. Extra copies of the plan should be distributed among recovery team members to be kept at their homes or in remote locations to assure its availability at all times. II. RECOVERY PLAN DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FUNCTIONS -- SENIOR /STAFF MANAGEMENT A. Set out the goals, responsibilities and authority of the disaster recovery team in a policy statement. Provide a general guideline regarding acceptable degrees of interruption of various activities as opposed to the cost of accelerated recovery. B. Name the recovery team. 1. Name the team leader and alternate. 2. Name team members and alternates. Confirm that all necessary responsibilities are covered by individuals with practical experience in that field. C. Review /audit the final plan document with the recovery team. i Jr.:: III. RECOVERY TEAM - PLAN DEVELOPMENT FUNCTIONS - -STAFF /LINE MANAGEMENT A. Develop guidelines and instructions for department or operating unit managers to use in determining emergency recovery requirements. B. Help department managers establish priority levels for departmental functions and evaluate the possibilities for transfer of functions, or parts thereof, to other company locations. C. Gather and organize emergency recovery information from all depart- ments. D. Consider a remote storage library for duplicate copies of critical records. 1. Building plans. a. Architectural & Structural b. Electrical C. Mechanical 2. Client lists - addresses 3. EDP media /software 4. Accounts Receivable 5. Accounts Payable 6. Payroll 7. Engineering, Tooling, Design Drawings E. Develop special I.D. cards /passes for the recovery team. F. Establish an emergency notification system. 1. Home and office telephone numbers of all primary and alternate recovery team members should be listed in the plan document. 2. A procedure for reaching out -of -town members should be established. G. Determine a probable temporary control center(s). 1. On the same premises, if possible. 2. Remote if major disaster - nearby hotel, satellite office, etc. r� H. Include floor plans, with occupancies indicated, in the plan document. I. Assign responsibilities. 1. Initial damage assessment team and liaison with public Fire /Police Officials. a. Senior Operations Manager b. Chief Building Engineer C. Other specialists as appropriate depending on location and extent of damage. 2. Public relations. a. New release b. Public announcements for: (1) Customers (2) Employees c. Information mailings to customers. (1) Maintain duplicate customer mailing address lists. Keep current. Store duplicate in remote location. (2) Establish contact with printer with high speed letter/ mailing capabilities. d. Instructions for telephone operators. (1) Customers (2) Employees (3) Media 3. Temporary space. Develop and maintain a current inventory of available, suitable' rental space, including rental agent and phone numbers. a. Internal real estate department b. Commercial real estate brokers. 4. Employee information /instructions. Establish a call system to advise employees where and when to report for work, etc. An employee home telephone number.list should be in the plan document. 5. Temporary help. Develop contacts with agencies for the different types of tempo- rary help that may be required. a. Secretarial /clerical b. Cleaning /housekeeping c. Movers /common labor d. Accounting /bookkeeping 6. Local cartage. Develop.contacts for help in moving useable furniture and equip- ment from the damage site and /or temporary rental furniture, etc. 7. Salvage operations. Establish contacts with vendors-or other specialists for immediate help in classifying salvable material and initiating appropriate action. Get recommendations for proper salvage /cleaning procedures for specialized equipment, etc. a. Office /Production machinery and equipment - including EDP b. Furniture and fixtures c. Records (1) Paper (2) Magnetic tape (3) Photo film d. Building /area clean -up /deodorization e. Building service equipment (1) HVAC system (2) Electrical system (3) Fire protection systems f. Cash and securities - valuable papers g. Fine arts NOTE: Time is critical in many salvage operations. 8. Transfer of specific operations to other locations. Determine what operations can be assumed by other company locations and what additional equipment, data links, supplies, etc. will be necessary. Also what operations could be "farmed out" to other firms at what additional costs. 9. Telephone communications - including data processing links. a. Determine emergency service capability of supplier. (1) Equipment /supplies (2) Labor 10. Procurement of needed equipment and supplies - record names and emergency numbers of both preferred and substitute vendors and vendors of alternate equipment - rental and purchase - tempo- rary and permanent. a. Furniture b. Office equipment c. Supplies d. File systems e. Specialized equipment and supplies. Pay special attention to long lead time replacement items. Consider alternatives such as equipment pools or maintenance of spares. 11. Security. Determine the security needs of both the damage site and the temporary new location. a. Alarm systems b. Outside guard services C. Company guards 13. Determine and prove the value of the loss and cost of the recovery effort.for the insurance claim. a. Time b. Direct outlay c. Loss of business J. Update plan quarterly. IV. DISASTER RECOVERY REQUIREMENT INFORMATION -- STAFF /LINE MANAGEMENT (DEPT. MANAGERS A. List all functions of each department or operating unit and establish priority levels for all functions. Review and confirm with recovery team. B. Determine emergency requirements for all functions. (1) Space (2)'Personnel - permanent and temporary (3) Furniture (4) Telephones /data links (5) Equipment /services Make note of specialized equipment with long lead times for replace- ment including sources-of supply and possible substitutes. (6) Supplies (7) Power, including special requirements for EDP operations (8) Security (9) Air Conditioning (10) Filing systems C. Determine possibilities for transfer of various departmental functions to other company locations. Review and confirm with recovery team. V. RECOVERY TEAM ACTIVITY - POST LOSS A. Receive notification. 1. Team Leader 2. Damage assessment team B. Establish temporary command center. C. Notify insurance agent - record telephone numbers. D. Assess damage - determine extent of recovery effort required. 1. Building and building systems 2. Telephones 3. Equipment and supplies 4. Records /files 5. Finished product E. Assemble recovery team and begin recovery effort. K .I MATERIAL HANDLING SAFETY PROGRAM INTRODUCTION: MATERIALS are handled between operations in every department, division, or plant of a company. It is a job.that almost every worker in industry performs - either as his sole duty or as part of his regular work, either- by hand or with mechanical help. Manual handling of materials increases the possibility of in- juries and adds to the cost of a product. To reduce the num- ber of materials handling injuries and to increase efficiency, materials handling should be minimized by combining or elim- inating operations. What materials handling must still be done should be done mechanically, insofar as possible. Mechanized materials handling equipment is being used more and more. In many industries, materials could not be processed at low cost if it were not for efficient mechanical handling. Al- though mechanical handling creates a new set of hazards, the net result (entirely aside from increased efficiency) is fewer injuries. MATERIALS HANDLING PROBLEMS: Manual handling of materials accounts for all occupational injuries (on any average) from every part of an operation, not just warehouse. As an average, industry moves terial for each ton of product produced. as much as 180 tons for each ton of produ 20 to 25 percent of - these injuries are the stockroom or about 50 tons of ma- Some industries move :!t. Strains and sprains, fractures, and bruises are the common in- Juries. They are caused, primarily, by unsafe work practices - improper lifting, carrying too heavy a load, incorrect grip- ping, failing to observe proper foot or hand clearances, and failing to. wear proper equipment. To gain insight on your materials handling injury problem, you should ask these questions about your present operating prac- tices. 1. Can the job be engineered so that manual handling will not be necessary? 67 LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT 0 H33335 0 The largest number of injuries occur to fingers and hands. People need instruction if they are to avoid the "natural" ways of picking objects up and putting them down. Training C in safe work habits, breakdown and study of even the simpl- est job operations, and adequate supervision can help mini- mize these accidents. General pointers that can be given to those who handle mater- ials include: 1. Inspect materials fbr slivers, jagged C 2. 'How do the materials being handled (such as chemi- 2. cals, dusts, rough, and sharp objects) hurt the people doing the handling? 3. Can the employees be given handling aids, such as properly sized boxes, adequate trucks, or hooks, . that will make their jobs safer? .4. Can the material be conveyed or moved mechanically to eliminate manual handling? • 5. Will protective clothing or other personal equip- them from being pinched. ment-help prevent injuries? These are by no means the only questions that might be asked, but they serve as a start toward overall appraisal and de- tailed'inquiry. MANUAL HANDLING METHODS: The largest number of injuries occur to fingers and hands. People need instruction if they are to avoid the "natural" ways of picking objects up and putting them down. Training C in safe work habits, breakdown and study of even the simpl- est job operations, and adequate supervision can help mini- mize these accidents. General pointers that can be given to those who handle mater- ials include: 1. Inspect materials fbr slivers, jagged edges, burrs, rough, or slippery surfaces. 2. Get a firm grip on the objects. 3. Keep fingers away from pinch points, especially when setting down materials. 4. When handling lumber, pipe, or other long ob- jects, keep hands away from the ends to prevent them from being pinched. 5. Wipe off greasy, wet, slippery, or dirty objects before trying to handle them. 6. Keep hands free of oil and grease. In most cases, gloves, hand leathers, or other hand protec- tors have to be used to prevent hand injuries. Their use must SUNAIy LOSS CONTROL • •� HOME:. H33335 0 ��MPAN�tS}' be controlled if they are to be worn around moving machinery. In other cases, handles or holders can be attached to objects themselves, such as handles for moving auto batteries, tongs for feeding material to metal farming machinery, or wicker baskets for carrying control laboratory samples. Feet and legs sustain a share of materials handling injuries, the greatest share being to the toes. One of the best ways to avoid injuries is to have people wear foot protection - safety shoes, instep protectors, and ankle guards. Eyes, head, and trunk of the body can also be injured. When opening a wire -bound or metal -bound bale or box, a person should wear eye protection as well as stout gloves, and take special care to prevent the ends of the bindings from flying loose and striking his face or body. The same precaution ap- plies to coils or wire, strapping, or cable. If materials are dusty or are toxic, the person handling -it should wear a respirator or other suitable personal protective equipment. Manual handling of materials increases the possibility of in- juries and adds to the cost of a product. To reduce the num- ber of materials handling injuries and to increase efficiency, materials handling should be minimized by combining or elim- inating operations. What materials handling is left should be done mechanically, insofar as possible. The enclosed safety pamphlet is a sample of available materials you can use to supplement your program on material handling. LIFTING AND CARRYING: Before employees are assigned to jobs requiring heavy and /or frequent lifting, make sure they are physically suited for the job. A persons' lifting abilities are not necessarily indi- cated by his /her height or weight. In some cases, a small man can lift heavy objects safely, where as a big, husky 250 - pounder.may not be able to do so without injuring himself. If a load is thought to be more than one person should handle, assign more than one employee to the operation or supply ma- terials handling equipment. Lifting and setting down are the first and last movements per- formed in handling materials. When done by hand, it is during these movements that most strains occur. It is important to LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT 69 H33335 0 C C train employees in proper lifting techniques if lifting in- juries are to be reduced. 1. Consider the size, weight, and shape of the ob- jects to be carried. Do not lift more than can be handled comfortably. If necessary, get help. i 2. Never carry a load that you cannot see over or around. Make sure that the path of travel is clear. -Lifting is so much a part of every day jobs that most of us do not think about it. But it is often done wrong, with bad results; pulled muscles, disk lesions, or painful hernias. Here are six steps to safe lifting: 1. Feet should be parted, with one foot along side the object being lifted and one behind. Feet comfortably spread give greater stability; the rear foot is in position for the upward thrust of the lift. 2. Use the sit -down position and keep the back straight - but remember that "straight" does not mean "vertical ". A straight back keeps the spine, back muscles, and organs of the body in correct`alignment. It minimizes the compression of the guts that can cause a her- nia. 3. The load should be drawn close, and the arms and elbows should be tucked into the side of the body. When the arms are held away from the body, they lose much of their strength and power. Keep - ing the arms tucked in also helps keep body weight centered. 4. The palmer grip is one of the most important ele- ments of correct lifting. The fingers and the hand are extended around the object you are going to lift. Use the full palm; fingers alone have very little power: 5. Tuck in the chin so your neck and head continue the,straight back line and keep your spine straight and firm. LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT H33335 0 �NSURAIy4 1 HOME ��MPAN�tS:. 6. Position body so its weight is centered over the feet. This provides a more powerful line of thrust and ensures better balance. Start the lift with a thrust of the rear foot. Setting down an object requires just the reverse procedure. When bulky objects are to be handled or when objects are to be carried on the shoulder, train your people in these techniques for specific situations. 1. To place an object on a bench or table - First set the object on edge and push it far enough onto the support to be sure it will not fall. Release it gradually as you set it down. Move it in place by pushing with the hands and body from in front of the object. This method prevents fingers from getting pinched. 2. To raise an object above shoulder height - Lift the object first to waist height. Rest the edge of the object on a ledge, stand, or hip. Shift hand position so object can be boosted after knees are bent. Straighten out knees as object is lifted or shifted to the shoulders. Y, 3. To change direction - Lift the object to carrying position, and turn the entire body, including the feet. Do not twist your body. In repetitive work, the person and the material should both b.e position- ed so that the person will not have to twist his body when moving the material. 4. If the object is too heavy to be handled by one per- son - Get Help.. When two or more men are handling the same object, one man should "call the signals ". All the men on the lift should know who this man is and should warn him if any one of the crew is about to relax his grip. HANDLING SPECIFIC SHAPES: Boxes or cartons are best handled by grasping them at alter- nate top and bottom corners and drawing a corner between the legs. Bags or sacks are grasped in the same manner as boxes. If a sack is to be raised to shoulder height, it should be raised to waist height first and rested against the belly or on the LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT 71 0 H33333 D � hip before it is swung to one shoulder so that it rests on its side. Barrels and drums. Men need special training to handle bar- rels and .drums safely. When two men are to overturn a full drum, they use this pro- cedure. 1. Make sure they have enough room. Cramped quarters can result in badly injured hands. 2. Both stand near each other, facing the drum. They grip the closest point of the top chime with both hands. Resting their palms against the side of the drum, they push until the drum balances on the lower chime. 3. They step forward a short distance, and each man ,releases one hand from the top chime in order to grip the bottom chime. They ease the drum down to a horizontal position until it rests solidly on its side. CIf.one man is to overturn a drum, he should. 1. Make sure he has enough room. 2. Stand in front of the drum, reach over it, and grasp the far side of the top chime with both hands. (A short man can grasp the near side of the chime, if this fs easier.) If the drum is tight against a wall or against other drums, pull on the chime with one hand and push against the wall (or other drum) with the other hand for additional control. 3. Pull the top of the drum toward him until it is balanced on the edge of the lower chime. 4. Transfer both hands to the near side of the top chime. Keep hands far enough apart to avoid their being pinched,-when the drum touches the floor. 5. Lower the drum. Keep the back-straight, inclined as necessary. Bend leg so that the leg muscles take the strain. 'If one man is to upend a drum, he reverses this procedure. Ac- tually, if one man must handle a drum, he should have a lifter LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT 0 7-2 H3773S D f w ' V i bar which hooks over the chime and gives him powerful lever- age and excellent control. Barrel and drum lifters are com- mercially available. To roll a barrel or drum, a man should push against the sides with his hands. To change direction of the roll, he should grip the chime, not kick the drum with his feet. To lower a drum or barrel down a skid, turn it and slide it endwise. Do not roll it. To raise a drum or barrel up a skid, two men stand on opposite sides of the skid (outside the rails, -not inside, and not below the object being raised). Then roll the object up the incline. ` Handling drums and barrels can be hazardous, even when using utmost. care. Special handling equipment and tools (approved by the safetyman or safety department) should be made avail- able to make the job safer and easier. Long objects, like ladders, lumber, or pipe, should be carried over the shoulder. The front end should be held as high as possible to prevent its striking other employees, especially when turning corners. When two or more carry an object, they should place it on the same shoulder, respectively, and keep in step. The recommended film which should be presented in lieu of this program is "A New Way to Lift ". This film is available through our Educational Department Library in New York. To reiterate, the key man in the success of any hazard control program is the first -line Supervisor. Not only is he the di- rect link between top management and the work force, but on his shoulders rests the responsibility for quality job train- ing, development of good safety attitudes, and detection of un- safe conditions and practices. He himself must be trained if he is to review and correct unsafe work practices. Therefore, I would recommend a review of this program with the Supervisprs to'get their involvement in the implementation and in the moni- toring practices. LOSS CONTROL DEPARTMENT 1 M3333S 0 T - � r _i EMERGENCY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE L BONS THREAT PROCEDURE PRE - PLANNING AND PRACTICE 1. As a matter of routine, all employees should check their immediate work areas prior to the doors opening. Employees should report any unusual objects to their supervisor or Base. These people will in turn contact the,Building Manager /Security Director on duty. DO NOT TOUCH any object which appears to be suspicious in nature. 2. Personnel familiar with particular areas of the building should be assigned those areas for the purpose of a search. (i.e., electricians- backstage, sound room, etc., engineers -pump station, generators, air handlers, etc.) 3. Use the 'Code 90" page system and avoid using panic terms over P.A. or radio. ACTUAL BOMB THREAT PROCEDURE 1. Person receiving the call should do the following: A. Do not panic. B. Get as much information as possible. 1) Where is the bomb? 2) What time will it go off? 3) What does it look like? 4) What kind of bomb is it? S) Why are you doing this? 6) Who are you? C. Try to find the location and type and time it is to detonate. D. Keep the person talking (i.e., bad connection, speak up. I do not understand). E. Do not try to switch the call to another extension. F. Use the form on Bomb Threats and record as much information as possible. C. After the party hangs up, notify the Building Manager or his designated representative. Give all of the information you have received and recorded. 2.. Building Manager /Representative will: A. Initiate a 'Code 90" search by notifying ushers and security, Building Security person, engineer, electrician, nurse, switch- board operator, and building guard. B. Coordinate with Security Director and others the areas to be searched first, designating areas of the building to be handled by each person. Contact Bloomington Police Department concerning the bomb threat. C. Maintain a constant update on the areas searched. r D. Establish a coordinating center (Base in the South Ticket Office) for the purpose of unifying directions, maintaining a log of areas searched, etc. E. Make all decisions concerning possible evacuation, dispersion of the crowd, etc. F. Upon arrival of the police department give as many details of what has transpired as possible and assist the police department in any way possible. 3. Supervisors will: A. Direct the immediate search of the entire building. B. Disperse their assigned people to search the areas given to 3) them by the Building Manager /Representative. C. Notify Base of areas searched. 6) D. Notify Base of any suspicious items found. E. Maintain a calm and efficient attitude while supervising the search. 4. Upon finding suspicious items: A. Notify Base of the.location. B. DO NOT 1) Touch 2) Pick up 3) Roll 4) Poke S) Cover 6) Disturb C. Keep the area clear of guests. S. In the event evacuation becomes necessary, the following will take place. A. Building Manager /Representative will make decision. 8. P.A. System will be utilized to inform patrons. Person speaking must be calm and clear in the directions given and muses t excite the crowd. See Announcement for Evacuation. C. Ushers, security, maintenance and all other building personnel will be used to assist guests out of the building in an orderly and efficient fashion. All exits will be used to move guests out of the building. Do not move guests by the area that has been sealed off as containing the explosive device. D. See Evacuation PrDCMWre. r .r REMEPMER - LOOK BUT DO NOT TOUCH! AHAD: SIInow" gale THREAT AWEDURE Keep caller talking - Give excuses (can't hear, bad etc. cOO!a�R i. Callez's message (exact): ? What time adll at gp Where is it What does it look like? What kind of bomb is it Why are you doing this? Who are you? DETAILS OF CALL £R Nan / Woman / Child Ol d / YOB Voice: loud soft raspy high pitch pl easant deep 10co"cated Manner: calm angry rational irrational coherent i deliberate emotional righteous laughing Speech: fast slow distinct distorted stutter nisa! sl►erstd lisp Background Noises: factory machines trains planes BectZaei animals music quiet office machines voices street party kids Language: excellent good fair poor foul Accent: local foreign race ntact Frank Jirik or lire Ccddarct or the NOTE: As soon as possible co n. DO NOT DISCUSS THE CAit wjrM ANYONE Building Security perso ELSE!!! EVACUATION PROCEDURE The following plan will be instituted when it has been determined bU the Building Manager, that the Met Center must be cleared of all attending patrons. 1. The Building Manager or his representative will make the decision to evacuate the building. Z. The P.A. System will be used to give specific directions on the plan of evacuation. See Announcement for Evacuation. 3. Base will be utilized as the command post for all communications and coordination of the evacuation plan. The Building Manager /Representative will be in charge., 4. All security, ushers, and any other available building personnel will be used to assist in the evacuation. A. All exit routes will be checked to insure that they are unlocked and without obstruction (i.e. grill gates, rope gates, tables, portable concession stands). B. Areas that have become danger3ous or impassable due to an emergency (i.e. fire, explosion, collapse of structure) will be cordoned off. This should be done in a manner that minimizes the loss of exit routes. S. Guests will be directed to the outside parking areas. 6. A central control area will be established for the purpose of identifying lost guests, riders and guests awaiting pickup. 7. Concession employees should lock their stands immediately and leave the building by the nearest exit. They should turn off grills and other heating equipment. They should not try to remove merchandise or money. B. Usher supervisors and other building personnel will check the building to insure total evacuation and inform Base when the building is clear. A. Ushers should check the seating area, restrooms, and concourse to insure that everyone has evacuated the building and to lend whatever assistance is necessary. 9. The First Aid Room should be supplemented by one or more ushers and a supervisor if available. 10. The Building Manager will determine if and when it will be safe for guests to return to the building. 11. In the event that the building will not be declared safe for return, the guests will be notified by the use of bullhorns by usher supervisors. 1 2. All personnel connected with the evacuation of the building will avoid panic and /or attempting to rush people. Keep the guests moving at a steady pace and give specific instructions as to the exits to use. 13. All available exits will be used for the evacuation. WHEELCHAIR EVACUATION PROCEDURE In the event that an emergency nould arise at Net Center which might necessitate evacuation, theollowing procedure would be effected for the wheelchair sections in Row on the JVorth,°'South, sides of the building and on the main floor: l) Every effort will be made_to clear wheelchair guests from Row 19 on the North, South, East and Hest sides of the building by use of the exit doors on each side of the building. 2) Wheelchair guests on the main floor should be directed to exit through the east or west ramp doors. Ushers and security will make every attempt to get wheelchair guests to the appropriate exits. 3) Do not use the elevator, especially in the event of a fire. LIFE THREAT PROCEDURE Life threat -will usually be relayed to the Met Center through the use of the phone system. The the methods to be used in the n PERSON RECEIVINC CALL: 1. Log the incoming call, using the "Bomb Threat" form. 2. Use the same procedures as outlined in the 'Bomb Threat" plan of the Met Center. 3. Upon completion of the call, notify the Building Manager or his designated representative. BUILDING MANAGER /REPRESENTATIVE WILL: 1. Inform the supervisors of the impending threat. 2. Maintain contact throughout the event with the supervisors as to any unusual circumstances arising during the event. 3. Coordinate any search and /or surveillance of the building with super- visors. 4. Make contact with the Bloomington Police Department to inform them of the threat. S. Monitor the surveillance and observation of the crowd. SUPERVISORS WILL: 1. Supervise the employees under their control in the observation of the crowd. 2. Maintain constant vigil for unusual happenings in the crowd. 3. Report to the Building Manager /Representative the progress of sur- veillance during the event. SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS 1. All threats to life will be reported to the Bloomington Police Depart- ment when they occur by the Building Manager /Representative. 2. All threats to life of an individual with international importance will be reported to Federal Authorities. 3. Under no circumstances is information concerning threats to life to be reported to any news media. r PERFORMERS EMERGENCY EXIT In the event that a crowd and /or natural disaster blocks the normal exit of performers from the building, the following procedure will be followed. I. Building Manager /Representative will determine if the safety of the performers is in jeopardy. T. If a determination is made that the interest of the crowd and per - formers is best met by an alternate exit, the Building Manager/Rep- resentative will advise the performers that an alternate exit will be used. It should be determined prior to a show ending whether the above plan will be placed in effect and the vehicles of the performers moved to the designated areas for exit. P o. FIRE EMERGENCY PROCEDURE r A. 1) The fire alarm notification panel is located at the Nest End employees entrance (guard's desk) and in the Electrical Room on the east end of basement level. 2) Each Operations supervisor and any building guard should be familiar with the ,panel location and functions. 3) The function of the panel is to indicate by a steady red light and audible alarm, that one of the manual pull stations, heat de- ,.vq, A tectors or smoke detectors has been set off. The location of each Ga alarm station is indicated in one of the Fire Alarm System note- ,\ books located at the West End employees entrance (guard's desk), Electrical Room and Operations office. B. During MON -EVENT hours, should the alarm sound and red light is illuminated, the building guard shall: 1) Immediately determine in which of the zones the alarm has been set off. 2) If a Building Security person or Dave Westby is in the building, contact them. Inform them that the alarm in a particular zone has gone off and they should investigate further. 3) If there is not a Building Security person on duty (i.e., early morning or late at night), follow this procedure: a) Call the Emergency Number (dial 911) and inform them that the fire alarm has gone off and that you will wait for the fire department at the West End employees entrance (guard's desk). b) Call Eric Kruse or another supervisor (i.e., Dave Westby, Jack Larson, Dave Black, Jim Goddard) and inform them of the alarm. c) Get the black Fire Alarm System notebook out of the guard's desk and have it ready for when the Fire Department arrives. d) Assist the Fire Departmentin whatever manner they request. C. During AN EVENT (guests in the building), should the alarm sound, and red light is dluminated, the building guard shall: 1) Immediately determine in which zone the alarm has been set off. 2) Notify, by radio, the Building Security person that a 'Code 80" (fire alarm) has been activated and the location. 3) The Building Security person will go directly to that location and determine the actual situation. 4) If a fire does exist: a) The Building Mecurity person will advise the building guard and Base. Base will contact the Building Manager /Representative. b) The Building Security person will enlist the help of as many ushers, security or other building personnel as is necessary to begin initial fire fighting operations. c) If the Building Manager, or his designated representative, deems it necessary to evacuate the building, he will contact Base (ext.360) where the announcement for evacuation will be broadcast on the sound system. See Announcement for Evacuation. d) After notifying Base, the Building Manager, or his designated representative, will call the Fire Department at 911 and advise them which side of the building they can enter from. D. During AN EVENT (guests in the building), should an usher or other building personnel discover a fire or smoke, or if they smell smoke, or electrical heat indicating there is a fire, the usher or other building personnel shall: 1) Determine the extent of the fire. a) If the fire is minor and can be extinguished quickly and easily with a fire extinguisher (i.e. fire in garbage can), take the actions necessary to put it out. See Now To Use Fire Extinguishers. b) If the fire is more widespread or cannot, be detected, inform Base immediately of the location of the fire and the degree of involve- ment (what is burning, how far it has progressed, etc.). 2) Base will notify supervisors that a 'Code 80' (fire alarm) has been activated and the location. 3) Supervisors will go directly to the location and determine the actual situation. 4) If a fire does exist: a) The supervisors will advise Base. Base will contact the Building Manager /Representative. b) The supervisors will enlist the help of as many ushers, security or other building personnel as is necessary to begin initial fire fighting operations. c) If the Building Manager, or his designated representative, deems it necessary to evacuate the building, he will contact Base (ext.360) where the announcement for evacuation will be broadcast on the sound system. See Announcement for Evacuation. d) After notifying Base, the Building Manager, or his designated representative, will call the Fire Department at 911 and advise them which side of the building they can enter from. F. The Security Director will: l) Dispatch one supervisor outside to direct the fire fighting equipment to the scene. 2) Send as many supervisors as can be spared to control the fire and evacuate the immediate area around the fire. 3) Direct the evacuation of all patrons from the building, if necessary. See evacuation procedure. 4) Maintain constant contact with all usher supervisors to insure an orderly exit of guests from the building according to the evacuation plan. NOW TO USE FIRE_EXTIHGUISHERS 1. Break the glass on the fire extinguisher case with the attached Oar* Start breaking it from the top so as to minimize the risk of injury from broken glass. 2. There are two types of extinguishers used at Met Center. One is a 8 C type; the other is an A e C type. The only difference is the type of chemicals inside. Both can be used for all types of fires that you encounter. Both types come in two colors - yellow and red. 3. To use either type of fire extinguishers, follow these steps: a. Pull the pin b. Hold the extinguisher upright c. Squeeze the lever d. Point the hose at the base of the flame 4. After using an extinguisher, report to your supervisor or BASE which one was used and where it was used. This information is needed for the following reasons: a. The fire will be reported b. The mess from the fire and the broken glass can be cleaned up c. The fire extinguisher used can be recharged. BUILDING EVACUATION PROCEDURES IN THE EVENT OF FIRE Elevator should be' shut off with the doors open on the basement level. Do not use the elevator! Basement Level Personnel should leave the area by -the concourse hallway and proceed to the East or West End ramp doors which they should exit through. Main Floor Guests should leave the area by the east or west end ramp doors which they should exit through. Elevated Seating Area Guests sitting in the upper or lower levels of the arena should be directed to the outer main concourse. They should proceed to exit through the nearest door. Observatory Club Guests in the Observatory Club should be directed out the front or back doors of the Club. They should proceed down the stairs to the outer concourse and should exit through the nearest door. No one should use the elevator. Press Club Guests in the Press Club should be directed out the front or back doors of the Club. They should proceed down the stairs to the outer concourse and should exit through the nearest door. Avoid using the press box door exit unless the other two are blocked by smoke or fire. ANNOUNCEMENT FOR EVACUATION ONAr I NAVE YOUR ATTENTFON. It has become necessary at, this time to ask for everyone's cooperation in leaving the building. There is no danger to any of you and we are asking you to leave as a precaution. Please bring all your personal belongings with you. Met Center personnel are stationed at each aisle to assist you. Please do not run or push. Move quickly and follow directions given to you. There is no need for alarm, but we do ask your cooperation. THANK YOU.' If an event is in progress and building evacuation is needed, the Building Manager, or his designated representative, will contact Base (Ext. 360) where the above message will be broadcast on the speaker system. This decision will be made by the Building Manager or his desig- nated representative. THE HEALTH HAZARDS OF OFFICE WORK Robert K. McLellan Introduction The hazards of office work have only recently erupted into national consciousness. Now, a casual review of the contemporary laypress is sufficient to identify the mounting concern of labor, management, communities and health authorities alike.(1 -7] Ironically,.. despite this public concern and an increasingly voluminous scientific literature on indoor air pollution and video display terminals, recently published textbooks written for the occupational physician contain only a few pages relevant to the health problems of office workers.[8 -10] Office related illness ranges from allergic disease to smouldering stress associated with dysfunctions, such as chronic fatigue and headache, to veritable epidemics resulting in building evacuation for weeks at a time. Most often the investigation of outbreaks of office illness using traditional measures of industrial hygiene is unrewarding.[11] Unlike industrial settings, offices rarely expose workers to high doses of toxins. Industrial hygienists generally find only many Low level contaminants Likewise, commonly used PpidemioLogicaL measures of occupational illness such as premature mortality, accidents, or sentinel diseases(12] have supported the general notion that offices are safe working environments. Deeper appreciation of illness arising from office work will come Associate, Gesell Institute of Human Development,, New Haven, CT. Assisted by Robert C. Wirth. 162 M 1AP"as No. 3 Hcalth Hazards. 163 as more sensitive epidemiological markers of dysfunction are used, e.g., turnover rates, absenteeism, incidence of stress related disease and syndromes. This paper reviews aspects of the office social and physiochemical environment that play a major role in the J RK health of office workers. An outline of changes in office job design, technology and air quality introduces a discussion of the health impact of specific office hazards: physical hazards, indoor air poLlutants and psycho — organizational stresses. Safety issues related to acute physical trauma and fire are not discussed. erupted The Office Setting of the ounting The office environment is generally defined as the health workplace of white collar workers,. including managers and public admipistrators, professional and technical personnel, sales vrature persons, and clerical workers.[131 In this sense, office minals settings include a wide variety of environments generally ,A'LiunaL thought of as nonhazardous, such as schools and department lied Itl1 stores, as well as those work places usually thought of as offices. :altogether then, the popuLation at risk for office related illness is huge. Of the 102 million member ,(,:Ise to workforce, approximately 30 million are office workers.[141 ;Lich as All trends indicate that these numbers will increase lidem -ics disproportionately to other jobs. The National Association lost of Office Workers estimates that 50% of the 20 million new jobs expected by 1990 will be in white collar work.[15] To is these millions should be added more millions who are rarely visitors to office workplaces, such as shoppers in department stores or more significantly, school children insnts. whose days include almost the same exposure as their .us of teachers. iden[s, notion The more narrow focus of this paper is on clerical Deeper workers - -a group representing about 17 million people and a 1 come group which is overwhelmingly female, about 80% of all clericals. Secondarily, those who work and study in school buildings -- another several million people - -are included in this review because of well publicized concerns regarding Haven, the safety of school environments.[46,16] The Work Office automation has served as a premier issue in labor organizing drives and conferences of clerical workers.[1-J,171 Concerns range from job displacement by 164 TOXIC SUBSTANCES JOURNAL Vol. machines to change in management techniques to ha•r_arkis related to the equipment itself. Whatever the hazards, there is Little disagreement. that the nature of clerical work is undergoing revolutionary changes as a result of the advent of the new office technology. A recent advertising supplement to '!'he New Yur'k 'Nines displays the: panoply of hardware at the heart of the electronic revolution.[18] Photos depict secretaries at isolated workstations with video display terminals hooked to microcomputers for word processing, computing or electronic mail. Telecommunication equipment is pouted for video conferencing or electronic recognition and synthesis of speech. The supplement, entitled "Office Today The Drive for Productivity," begins with an article on productivity by Randy Goldfield, President of Gibbs Consulting Group, the famous secretarial school. The article is flanked by a Xerox (Trademark) advertisement likening office workers to hens. Toffler, the popular futurist, propounds the advent of high technology in offices.as the "third wave," after the agricultural and industrial revolutions, in the re- organization of work. His concerns for the future of office work center not on the new office technology itself, but rather on attempts to employ it using strict applications of Taylor's scientific management techniques.[19] The,, "industrialization" of clerical work threatens to add the stresses of the assembly line to the total burden of health hazards in the office.[20] The Air Indoor air pollution has,cmerged as another significant factor - threatening the health of office workers. The ubiquitous .use of synthetic materials in the construction and furnishing of offices, along with office activities generating a legion of chemical contaminants, has added to the deterioration of air quality by that traditional bete noire, cigarette smoke. Historically, general ventilation, supplementing passive infiltration, has been the major method of removing indoor air contaminants. Rising energy costs during the last two decades have prompted radical conservation measures that have magnified the risk of illness related to indoor air pollution.[21,22] In 1973, the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) established minimum and recommended ventilation rates.[23] Due to pressures for energy conservation, ASHRAE amended these standards in 1975 to specify that the minimum values be used in ventilation No. des r e_, At ant! re coil VCH- ASH i.11 d ,.W V L ii min ali set m0 r ex bui hu i We t ut in �10 V spe ore con.: a it' Off Ph, t ll: ser oft chr St r inc if icant Office Hazards and Worker Health . The ruction Physical Hazards ivities ,Ied to Noise I bate lation, major High speed printers may approach noise levels close to �lergy the OSHA standard of 90 decibels, but generally noise seldom r radical seriously threatens clericals with hearing loss. Rather, ; office noise serves mainly as a source of distraction and :- i d of 1973, chronic irritation.[28] Such distraction adds to other ln�l 7fir stressors burdening clericals that may increase the um and incidence of stress related.disease (see below).[29 -321 res for l' ?75 L tat ion —ventilation recommendations in 198U.[25j n particu , word 'ot. No. 3 Health Hazards 165 5 several times higher in areas where smoking is permitted. Investigators have shown that at the previously recommended design.[24] With this move, ASHRAE had decreased yards recommended air supply to building occupants by 3 -5 times. Ards, At the same time, newly constructed buildings allowed less rical and less passive air infiltration. Older buildings were the retrofitted for the same purpose. icing building codes are sti1L based on the old standard. As of Recognizing that modern office buildings were local building codes, their standards are seldom enforced more air tight, ASHRAE upgraded its minimum pith considerably. I lar if icant Office Hazards and Worker Health . The ruction Physical Hazards ivities ,Ied to Noise I bate lation, major High speed printers may approach noise levels close to �lergy the OSHA standard of 90 decibels, but generally noise seldom r radical seriously threatens clericals with hearing loss. Rather, ; office noise serves mainly as a source of distraction and :- i d of 1973, chronic irritation.[28] Such distraction adds to other ln�l 7fir stressors burdening clericals that may increase the um and incidence of stress related.disease (see below).[29 -321 res for l' ?75 L tat ion —ventilation recommendations in 198U.[25j n particu , word ASHRAE acknowledged the significance of tobacco smoke as an it ion indoor air contaminant by recommending a ventilation rate iconic several times higher in areas where smoking is permitted. Investigators have shown that at the previously recommended „gins minimum ventilation rates, room air, where smoking was field, allowed, could approach carbon monoxide concentration limits set by the EPA and exceed particle contaminant levels by :m ark) than an order of magnitude. [ 261 Controversy still more exists regarding the most appropriate.ventilation rates. ent o, The. older, 1975 standard has been incorporated into I' the _ building codes of 45 states. Unfortunately, most current building codes are sti1L based on the old standard. As �tti.ce well, although ASHRAE recommendations usually form the basis 'uce local building codes, their standards are seldom enforced 0:1S �; Of in the CieLd. federal Property Management Regulations which in The govern ventilation rates in all federally owned buildings ,�I the specify that "outside air intake shall be reduced to the Ith greatest extent possible." A 107 fresh air intake is considered adequate, but inspectors frequently find outside air intake reduced to zero (0).[27] if icant Office Hazards and Worker Health . The ruction Physical Hazards ivities ,Ied to Noise I bate lation, major High speed printers may approach noise levels close to �lergy the OSHA standard of 90 decibels, but generally noise seldom r radical seriously threatens clericals with hearing loss. Rather, ; office noise serves mainly as a source of distraction and :- i d of 1973, chronic irritation.[28] Such distraction adds to other ln�l 7fir stressors burdening clericals that may increase the um and incidence of stress related.disease (see below).[29 -321 res for l' ?75 L tat ion 166 TOXIC SUBSTANCES IOUKNAL Light Vol. Light is among the most basic of necessities for office work.. Predictably, research about its effect on productivity abounds.[33] Concern about its effect on office worker health is much more recent and considerably less well studied. There is little doubt that the glare, contrast, and brightness of VDT images contribute to complaints of eye stra.in.[34] The prolonged near - visual tasks involved in most VDT operations are similar to other visually demanding clerical jobs that produce eye strain, blurred vision, color fringes, and temporary acuity changes. The National Research Council's recent review of existing literature suggests that job design is an important component. of VDT operators' visual complaints.[35] The Council also found no valid evidence, at this time, that supports the conclusion that permanent opthalmologic changes occur. Much more controversial are the effects of the spectrum of electromagnetic radiation used to light offices and schools. There are those that argue that narrow spectrum lighting, such as fluorescent or sodium vapor, may contribute to headache or even hyperactivity among school children.[36] Others suggest that ultraviolet emissions from fluorescent lighting that mimics the full spectrum of sunlight may also mimic its ultraviolent hazards such as skin cancers.[37] One group of investigators has even theorized that ultraviolent frequencies in office lighting actually create photochemical smog by acting on hydrocarbon contaminants of indoor air.[38 -39] Radiatum Ranking high among the health concerns of VDT operators are fears of serious illness due to radiation emissions of the cathode ray tubes that are the heart of the VDTs. Such fears have prompted the creation of governmental study commissions and Led several employers to take the additional precaution of allowing pregnant VDT operators to transfer to. other jobs at equal pay and seniority.[40] Of note, however, is that a variety of other electronic office and home equipment such as photocopiers and televisions emit electromagnetic fields similar -to VDTs. The chief fears articulated by clerical workers' organizations have been about cataracts and reproductive system failures. At this point, reported clusters of birth defects and spontaneous abortions among VDT operators appear to be due to ul. 5 Iice on on Ably are, Lo �uaL thec I ing Cant The I hat n;es t rum and t rum mu V hoo L m ons of v e n ti.ng ° rbon 11" S- ol Such A udv ona1 •r Lo IULO' Lind �•vLL L•a rs icen this .cous ►. 0 rqw-. No. 3 Health Hazards statistical flukes rather than radiation effects.[41] 167 Though Lhere are concerns regarding the proper shielding of CRTs,' most reports concur that VDT radiation emissions are low.[28] The key issue that nags is the potential effect of long term exposure to low level radiation, especially in regard to the non - ionizing frequencies. Presently, valid, reliable scientific research in this area is lacking, leaving the occasional case report suggestive of health effects from Low dose non - ionizing radiation to fuel public fears.[42] Ergonomic Problems Ergonomics is the study of the relationship between the physical design of the work environment and the worker. A poorly designed work station can often lead to nagging musculoskeletal aches and fatigue as well as more serious problems such as carpal tunnel syndrome or inflammatory disorders of the tendons and joints. Carpal tunnel syndrome, an illness leading to pairs, loss of sensation, and weakness in the hands and inflammatory syndromes of the tendons and joints, commonly emerges from tasks requiring monotonous motions such as keyboard operators are required to make.[44] VDTs have become the focus of ergonomic problems in offices that in fact affect many clericals not using VDTs. Back, neck, shouLder, and leg aches usually lead the list of muscular complaints.[41] Studies comparing complaints of VDT and non -VDT office workers have tended to absolve VDTs as the chief office ergonomic culprit while at the same time revealing how common these complaints are among all clericals with similarly demanding jobs.[45] To the extent that VDT operators report more muscular complaints than non - operators, they usually report more demanding keying requirements.[46] Such equipment design problems as improper chair height, keyboard height, viewing distance, keyboard locations, etc. have been listed as variables that can be manipulated to improve the comfort of VDT. operators and other clericals.[34] Importantly, however, job design problems such as repetitive work, few rest breaks, and lack of control over work pace emerge as key factors contributing to the prevalence of musculoskeletal complaints.[41,46] In other words, although ergonomic problems are clearly important in the etiology of musculoskeletal complaints, 168 TOXIC SUBSTANCES IOURNAL Vol. 5 No. work organizational. issues arLse as signifi.cnnt modifiers of such distress. .Since business interest has focussed on VDTs as tools for increasing productivity, the installation of video - hardware may often spearhead organizational changes that aggravate ergonomic probLems.[15] Accordingly, standards designed to prevent musculo- skeletal problems (and eye strziLn) oeneraLly suggest both ergonomic improvements and job redesign, such as increased opportunities for rest breaks, exercise, and job diversification.[41] Indoor Air Pollutants Three sources of indoor air pollution have been identified: (1) infiltration of outdoor pollutants, (2) activities of building occupants and (3) off - gassing and degeneration of building materials and furnishings.[22) Deterioration of -indoor air quality by outdoor air pollutants is rare.[47] Tobacco .smoking clearly outstrips other occupant activities as the single most pervasive and offensive indoor air pollutant.[11 A variety of other indoor activities also generate potentially significant toxic exposures, e.g., photocopying generates ozone, graphic arts materials release organic solvents.[49] As well, the fabric of the building itself may release such substances as radon (a radioactive gas), formaldehyde, or fiberglass. Indoor infectious and allerbenic pollutants may grow in and be distributed by air handling equipment. Investigators of illness putatively related to the office environment can turn to several sources for air contamination criteria: (1) NIOSIi Criteria Documents and recommended standards, (2) the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIII) Threshold Limit Values, (3) OSHA standards, (4) indoor air quality standards developed by ASHRAE,. and (5) the Environmental Protection Agency National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). With some exceptions, however, these standards are seldom useful in explaining office iliness.[ll] Indeed, reliance on standard industrial hygiene measurements and reference to extant standards are not likely to reward the investigator of office related illness with an understanding of its etiology. For the most part the short and long term significance of low level exposures to the multitude of potential office contaminants has simply not been carefully investigated. S t Vol. 5 No. 3 Health Hazards 169 i f r5 0 Carcinogens in the Office Setting Although clerical work has not been.identified as work with a risk of occupational cancer, four carcinogens present video in offices have begun to attract concern -- asbestos, radon, that tobacco smoke, and formaldehyde. ndards d eye Asbestos . and rest Asbestos lurks as-a pervasive and worrisome pollutant in offices and schools. although such indoor asbestos exposures are clearly much lower than among workers involved in mining, industry, and construction, no safe threshold of exposure has been identified. Indeed, community members who been live near asbestos industries or household contacts of (2) asbestos workers have developed asbestos related diseases, and including cancers and respiratory diseases.[50 -51] Asbestos fibers have been measured in a variety of environmental air settings, including schools and offices where asbestos was Strips used in construction and insulation. Exposures can and potentially exceed the current emergency OSHA standard (0.5 other fibers /cc) by close to two orders of magnitude during iEcant tearout and custodial activities, e.g., sweeping and :rc�phic dusting.[54] Exposures to asbestos fallout from open, the frayed surfaces under quiet conditions are generally less c„ than occupational standards, but a wide variability exists.[22] Most parties have agreed that asbestos removal it and or encapsulation is indica,ed. Unfortunately, the financial costs are substantial and have blocked widespread application of such measures. Well over half of the the nation's 85,000 public schools and 20,000 private schools ,ii-r have failed to comply with Federal rules to identify and S ;Ind report on any asbestos in school buildings. It is estimated .ice of that at an average of $100,000 per school, the total bill [.Emit for asbestos removal will approach $1.4 billion.[45] indards uection Radon lath useful Radon is a gaseous radioactive decay product of radium 1c'c1 on and uranium that has been shown to increase the risk of lung ICV to cancer . in uranium miners.[53 -54] Radon occurs naturally in tigator soil, groundwaters, and many construction materials. f its Expected Lifetime exposure to indoor radon is at least three term (3) orders of magnitude less than that of uranium miners. ��le of Nonetheless, radon is concentrated in some buildings to refully result in an expected exposure and order of magnitude higher than outdoor air.[47] Uncertainties about lifelong low dose radiation exposure make predictions regarding the health ieffects of such exposures difficult. 170 -FOX1C SUBSTANCES IOUKNAL Vol. S No Because radon exposures differ considerably from one building to another, appropriate epidemiological studies are urgently needed to better define the health effects of Low dose radon exposure. Such studies may indicate that selection of appropriate building materials and ventilation rates should take radon exposures into account. Tobacco Smoke and Formaldehyde Tobacco smoke reigns as the leading indoor air pollutant. Although cigarette smoking is the chief cause of lung cancer in the United States and suggestive studies exist, evidence currentl}r available is not yet sufficient to conclude that involuntary smoking leads to cancer in non - smokers.[27,55] Formaldehyde is an ubiquitous chemical used in many of the construction materials and furnishings of modern office buildings. It offgasses for- months to years after installation.[56] Although recorded levels in offices have generally been low,[11] concern arises because definitive experiments have demonstrated that formaldehyde is a carcinogen under laboratory conditions. Despite a lack of confirmatory epidemiological data, the Federal Panel on Formaldehyde has concluded that formaldehyde should be presumed to be a human carcinogen.[57] The upper respiratory tract is the probable,target organ. Building Associated Epidemics Acute outbreaks of illness confined to persons working in a building without secondary spread of the illness by affected persuns to those encountered outside of the buildin; have been termed building associated epidemics.[ll] These illnesses are to be contrasted with infectious epidemics where disease transmission may occur wherever the infected person (or vector) contacts susceptible persons. The focus here is on those outbreaks that have occurred in the office or school settings. There has been no systematic attempt to identify the incidence of building associated epidemics. By all available measures, complaints related to office buildings are soaring. Newspapers routinely carry stories of building associated illness.[1] Not infrequently, investigations drag on for months impeding productivity.[2] Nor is it unheard of for buildings to be closed altogether for extended periods of time while investigations and clean up ti Vol. 5 No. 3 Health Hazards 171 one or simply reassurance proceed.[6] NIOSH has completed and are � reported the most investigations of building associated Low epidemics. Of 115 such investigations conducted between that 1978 and mid -1981, 80% were requested in the last two (2) Ation years of this period.[58] Since all of these investigations were based on complaints, however, no generalizations can be 6 made about the true incidence of such epidemics. _ Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Humidifier Fever air s Ise of Outbreaks with clear cut biological pathogens most udies closely conform to traditional patterns of epidemics. ";It to Accordingly, these outbreaks have been most exhaustively non- documented and reseasched.[111 Guidelines for the investigation of such epidemics have been published.[59] I\ of Hypersensitivity pneumonitis and humidifier fever are )f tice immunologically mediated diseases with differing after rt on the intensity and have i it ive is a -k of I on rI be Upper ork ing �, by the t ious r the rsons. e in the all Idings iLding ;it ions is It r for III up manifestations dependent 'in pa duration of exposure to a variety of antigens. In the office setting, these diseases have been associated with exposures to several types of bacteria, protozoa, and fungi. Disease syndromes vary from recurrent acute episodes of prostration with shortness of breath, cough, and high fever to outbreaks of fever, chills, myalgias and malaise without prominent pulmonary symptoms. Some outbreaks have been associated with more atypical symptoms such as polyuria nausea, headache, and conjunctivitis, in addition to respiratory complaints.[11] Typically, symptoms begin four (4) to six (6) hours after exposure and are worse at home. By the next workday, the symptoms have spontaneously resolved, but only to recur after re- exposure. Some individuals who are exposed to the antigens of hypersensitivity pneumonitis for prolonged periods may develop chronic disease with irreversible pulmonary damage.[60] Reported cases have shown attack rates among similarly exposed workers to vary between one (1) and 71.(11] The responsible organisms generally handling system condensate or humidifier distributed by ventilation ducts an ans. epidemic generally requires replacement or the implicated air handling systems. Trials are usually ineffective.;ll] grow in air water and are Control of the nodification of of disinfection 172 TOXIC SUBSTANCES IOURNAL Infectious Diseases Vol. 5 A wide variety of infectious diseases are transmitted by indoor air.[61] Legionnaire's disease, Pontiac fever, and Q fever are of particular interest in that they are non - communicable and are limited to sources in buildings generally considered non - hazardous. Both Legionnaire's disease and Pontiac fever are caused by exposure to air contaminated by the bacterium, Legionella pneumophilia. Identified sources of aerosols of the bacterium have included cooling tower and outdoor excavation s tion work near buildings.[62) Legionnaire's disease is a serious multisystem illness with a case fatality rate in the first reported epidemic of 16 %.[68) It also occurs sporadically in the community in a more benign form.[621 Pontiac fever is a much milder illness characterized by fever, chills, headache and myalgias that remit spontaneously within 5 days. The attack rate, however, is characteristically 95 -100% among exposed persons compared to the 1 -7% of exposed populations that fall ill with Legionnaire's disease.[11) Q fever is caused by a rickettsial micro - organism, Coxiella burnetti, found in the excreta and placental tissue of sheep, goats and cattle. Several outbreaks of Q fever have occurred through airborne transmission in the offices of research laboratory buildings and hospitals among persons without direct ,. exposure to the animals.[11] Non,Speci%ie Syndromes ,'VIOSH has been most frequently asked to investigate building associated epidemics f E that have not been as well characterized medically as those with a microbiological pathogenesis.[501 Outbreaks of L mucous membrane irritation, pruritus or other non - specific C symptoms have been variously reported as due to fibrous glass 1 or mineral wool exposures, the closed building syndrome or mass hysteria.[11] C A few clinical features distinguish the closed building syndrome. Generally, affected f people present symptoms such as eye irritation, sore throat, cough, itchy F skin, nausea, fatigue, or headache that have few objective correlates on physical and laboratory exam. Although the o symptoms are annoying and can significantly affect productivity, they are not seriously a health threatening. They are all t symptoms h that are common in the general population and can be caused by a myriad of non- occupational problems. As such, ansmitted recognition of a building associated problem can be delayed. c fever, Suspicion about occupational illness is raised when the are non- classic temporal relationship between work and symptoms is buildings noted. re-caused gionella of the outdoor disease it y rate occurs .Its" —'1 rived by remit ever, is pared to I wiL'h rganism, I,icentaL iks of Q in the Is among ,stigate is well logical Lation, Iriously ,osu res, ,uilding ms such nausea, .rtes on :as are hey are Ymptoms Some outbreaks_ of pruritus have been explained by exposure to fibrous glass or mineral wool disseminated through insulated ventilation ducts or during reconstruction. Airborne levels rarely exceed OSHA standards, but wipe samples of surface reveal the tell -tale fibrous contamination. Exposure presumably occurs through contact with Lhese surlaces.[11,64 -651 Scattered outbreaks of other non - specific symptoms have also been related to specific exposures such as carpet shampoo residues, carbon monoxide, or sulfur dioxide.[11,66- 67 1 Nonetheless, despite the legion of indoor air contaminants that have been measured, rarely are single toxins clearly implicated as Lhe culprit in building associated epidemics. Again and again, investigators of such outbreaks record only measurements of multiple low level contaminants. Synergistic or additive effects of contaminants is probable but documenting research is lacking. Lack of effective ventilation and poor climate control, i.e., humidity and temperature, have emerged as the sole explanation for most of NIOSH's and other groups' investigation of outbreaks of non - specific syndromes related to building exposures.[11,501 Energy conservation measures - designed to decrease ventilation are often at fault.[1,22,68] Experiments designed to alter ventilation in office settings without occupants' knowledge have suggested that whatever the cause, improving ventilation can often ameliorate office workers' complaints.[38,39] Perhaps as important as the actual temperature, humidity or ventilation rate itself is the worker's sense of personal control over these factors.[39] The "sealed window" syndrome might serve as a good term to convey not only the notion of poor air quality, but also the accompanying frustration of workers unable to regulate their environment to meet their personal comfort needs. Although human factors engineers may suggest temperature, humidity, and ventilation ranges that satisfy most people, no single number will be satisfactory. ..Inability to individualize office micro- climates. in new (or retro- fitted) office buildings may add to group annoyance about indoor air quality.[7] The diagnosis.of mass hysteria is sometimes used as one of exclusion, a waste basket Label used to describe perplexing outbreaks of building associated illness when no clear cut environmental etiology has been found.[11] Some authors have suggested that this diagnosis is an excuse for inadequate investigation.[69] Contemporary papers uniformly call for positive criteria-to be used in evaluating the possibility of mass hysteria.[70] Suggested characteristics include: subjective symptoms, especially chose associated with anxiety and hyperventilation, an explosive onset with rapid remission of symptoms yet common relapses of the affected people at different times and places, female preponderance, clinical features occurring in an epidemiological pattern difficult to explain on an organic basis, and dissemination of the illness by visual or verbal cues.[70] In the century spanning 1871 to 1971, Sirois found 78 case reports of mass hysteria.[71] Thirty -four of these cases occurred in schools. Between 1973 and 1977, Levine found 21 such outbreaks reported in the English literature.[72 -73] Close to half of these occurred in schools. Few contemporary cases of office epidemics meet the positive criteria of mass hysteria, but psychologic factors play an important role in their etiology and natural course.[11,7] Organizational and Psychological Issues Clerical work was ranked by NIOSH as number 2 among the 130 most stressful occupations.[74] Stress is any. factor which creates a non-specific but recognizable pattern of physiological, emotional and /or behavioral changes in a person. Stress can create a positive pattern of change. Beyond a limit however, strain patterns emerge which antecede diseases such as coronary heart disease, peptic ulcer or mental illness. Such strain patterns include: increases in unhealthy behaviors like smoking, over - eating, or coffee drinking.[75] Several factors have been found to act as significant stressors in the office including machine pacin g, time pressure, work overload, lack of job security, ' A S No. 3 Health Hazards 175 idle and little or no participation in decision making.[75,77] lire As organizational changes have evolved with the introduction lice of .new office technology, the importance of these factors ;sir has become even more blatant.[15.] Tndeed, even the rapidity of technological change itself becomes a significant stressor. 1 78 1 0 mc jibe The role of organizational issues in the incidence of no complaints related to VDTs has been well documented.[35] It Fume is likely that psycho - social stressors play some role in for mediating the health - effects of other office hazards as rmly well. the When causes of mass illness are not easily found or episodes recur despite' environmental intervention, the workplace can become a breeding ground for anxiety, rumor and and fear further fueled by media coverage.[70] These n of psychogenic stressors can be as threatening and debilitating at as inadequate ventilation.[78] The emotional dysfunction ical associated with the Three Mile Island disaster has been cult clearly documented as the most significant health effect the related to the actually very low measured levels of radiation. [ 79 1 78 Some investigations of office buildings have been fics ' precipitated by anxiety about the safety of a work X. i_;'e environment despite the remoteness or low levels of ILSII exposure. Even after environmental clean up has been L11 accomplished, distrust and persistent anxiety in what has :" «t usually become a socially polarized environment continues to c be disabling.[ll] Skillful social intervention becomes as 11ral important in this situation as a clinician's bedside manner in dealing with the anxieties of an individual patient. Practitioners of environmental medicine have been raised in the same mold as other physicians; although lip the service is given to mind body unity, clinical practice ctor largely continues to uphold their duality. Not of surprisingly, there has been a tendency to categorize office related illness as either environmental or psychogenic. The `'��• investigation and management of office epidemics should Lich always include the tools of organizational and group I'lic psychological diagnosis and intervention along with those of ude: industrial hygiene and epidemio. i ng, d to The Sensitive Worker Dine iLy, Many health problems occur among office workers that s i 176 TOXIC SUBSTANCES JOURNAL Vol. 5 generally affect less than 10 percent of similarly exposed populations, but are related to office employment. Such problems may include exacerbation of existing problems such as low back pain, asthma, or anxiety or initiation of new illness such as contact dermatitis. Stress, ergonomic factors, and poor air quality have already been mentioned and may in some situations affect only a few, more susceptible workers. Here, a few respiratory and dermatological syndromes that have not already been discussed and that are probably immunologically based are briefly mentioned. A variety of respiratory complaints may be triggered by the office environment. Allergic workers' asthma or rhino — conjunctivitis may be aggravated or initiated by aeroal iergens or low level chemical air contaminants. Concentrations of dust, mold, cigarette smoke, formaldehyde, etc. may exceed those at home. Some workers have won workers' compensation cases due to .office tobacco smoke -exposures.[271 4 One patient. of mine, a VDT operator previously sensitized to formaldehyde in a urea formaldehyde foam insulated house, suffered her first asthmatic attack when accidentally sprayed with an ammonia based glass cleaner at work. Thereafter, she was unable to tolerate continued exposure to cigarette smoke prevalent in her office. She was let go on medical disability; conclusion of her workers' compensation case is still pending. . In another unpublished case of mine, a mold and weed sensitive patient for the first time developed significant asthma at work in a state office building where organophosphate and pyrethrin based pesticides were routinely sprayed. The spraying acted as cholinergic and antigenic challenges (pyrethrins cross —react with ragweed), precipitating bronchospasm. Although unusual, contact dermatitis has also been 4 described as due to office exposures such as photocopy paper or carbonless copy paper.[80 -82] Conclusion The office relatively safe years, the push productivity has has traditionally been considered a and clean workplace. Over the past 20 toward energy conservation and increased ; resulted in profound environmental and Hcalth Hazards 177 Vol. 5 No. 3 _ ;posed organizational changes in office work that threatens the Such health of office workers. Office related illness may Such include serious, easily recognized medical problems such as hypersensit iv ity pneumorI LL is, Legionnaire's disease, or much A new >numic more remotely, cancer due to asbestos exposure. Traditional licmed markers of occupational exposure and disease, however, are re generally inadequate to monitor office associated sickness. inu Prevention will require attention to organizational issues :re ind in the workplace a t s well as envirotlinvi al controls. t ► tl are 'red by References rhino- a e roa l. 1. Repace, J.L.: Indoor air pollution. Environ. Intl. 8:21 -36, 1982. tla nt s. W., Fear of contamination still impedes museum. yew York Times. p 2. Biddle, lehyde, September 18, 1983- ;e won R.: Health risk shuts Rutgers building. yew York Times, February smoke 3. Hanley, 12, 1983. P.• Schools in U.S. lag.on asbestos peril. New York lines, 4. Shabecoff, . viously September 24, 1983• 0 foam 5, Schmidt. W.E.: Huge cost of removing asbestos haunts schools. :E•w York I; wheel Times, ULLoher 5, 19`33. nor ;tt 6. ". L.: Upvtate board is rcopcning s(ho, '; closed after illness. New :nl InUt:d +i�ll�•'' York Times, .April 12, 19+33. She r k er s' 7. Makow•er, J.: Office Hazards. Washington, D.C.. Tilden Press, 1991. .o C. (Ed.): Occupational Medicine. Chicjco. Year Book Medical S. Zens, Publishers, Inc., 1975. tt1 weed g Year Book C. (Ed.): Developmrnts ill Occupational ledt ine. Chita o, ►Ilic a nl 9. Zens, Medical Publishers, Inc., 198U. where we re W.S. (Ed.): Environmental and Occupational Medicine. Boston, Little, 7iC and d 10. Rom, Brown, and Company, 1983. _i�Wee d), Kathleen: Building- associated epidemics. Io Dudne-p C.S. and 11. Kreiss, n, to p Walsh, P.S. (Eds.): Indoor air quality, CRC Press, Boca Rat 12. Rutstein, D.D. et al. Sentinel health events (Occupational): A basis for 12. AJPH 73:1054- 1062, 1133. ;o been physician recognition and public health surveillance. p� pilper White Collar Workers. New York, Random House, 1971. 13. Blum, A.A., et al.: 14. United States Department of Labor'. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Women in D.C., 1979. the labor force: Some new data series. Report 575. Washington. !ere d a 15. National .Association of Office Workers, Working Women: Race against time: 20 Automation of the Office. Cleveland, Ohio. 1930. past itic reased ital and C. found it very difficult to link the symptoms with the known toxicology of the substances they have identified. Their most common findings are problems or defects in air conditioning, ventilation, temperature, and humidity control - problems about which workers complain constantly. GASES: VAPORS: Carbon Monoxide Phenol s Ozone Toluene Formaldehyde Benzene NOx Alcohol Carbon Dioxide Ammonia Methyl Alcohol 1, 1, 1- Trichloroethane Organic Hyrocarbon PARTICULATES: ORGANISMS: Fiberglass Bacteria Asbestos Fungi Other Respirables Sources of Indoor Work Space Contamination It is convenient to consider contamination within buildings in terms of 1) contamination from outside the buildings; 2) contamination from the fabric of the buildings, including furnishings; and 3) contaminations which are gener- ated within the space by the activities going on there, including cigarette smoking, body odors, carpet shampoos, etc. This approach is useful in plan- ning a medical study with IH sampling. 1) Contamination Presumed From Outside Several investigators concluded that indoor contamination may be from motor vehicle exhaust fumes from the garage within the building, and from recirculated fumes from mechanical equipment, but it was stressed that at the time of these studies the levels of carbon monoxide and diesel fumes found within the spaces were unremarkable. 2) Contamination From Building Fabric Substances such as asbestos ceiling tiles, fiberglass insulation, car- pet glue, urea formaldehyde foam, insulation, paints and solvents, window caulking and asphalt fumes from the roof have been identified by the investigators as potential contaminants from the building fabric. In each of these investigations these substances were- mea- sured at very low levels, considerably lower than any occupational ex- posure standard, and the investigators were hard pressed to find a causative association with symptoms. 3) Contamination From Activities Inside the Building In most of the investigations there was no obvious pollutant entering the building from outside or coming from the fabric. Some of the fac- tors within the office spaces that were looked at by investigators, and that may have contributed to the discomfort for the workers in the - 28 - space, were: inadequate ventilation /stale air, office machines, odors, temperature /humidity problems, cigarette smoke, carbonless copy paper, cleaning agents, carpets, fibrous glass, contaminants in the air conditioning system and poor lighting. Office Machines NIOSH frequently gets.requests to evaluate emissions from office machines, especially copy machines, because of workers' anxieties about possible harmful effects. In investigations involving office machines where workers complained of irritant symptoms, the substances most commonly identified in the environ- ment include ozone; ammonia; formaldehyde; _a variety of petroleum solvents, including alkaned, mineral spirits, parafin and petroleum distillates; zylene; toluene; benzene; methyl alcohol and carbon monoxide. In these investigations the only substances that were identified that had a strong association with symptoms were methyl alcohol (from spirit duplica- tors) and methacrylates7.(from signature facimile recording machines), which have an unpleasant odor. In all these situations the industrial hygienist and the investigators recommended that ventilation should be improved around these machines or the machines should be moved to a better ventilated area; in the situations NIOSH has followed up, the problems were solved and symptoms alle- viated. NIOSH has been involved in investigations where workers have complained of irritant symptoms from exposure to carbonless copy paper. Formaldehyde has been thought to be associated with these symptoms although investigators have never measured levels of formaldehyde gas in offices handling carbonless copy paper that approach levels where symptoms usually occur. Conclusion These essentially negative findings do not necessarily imply that there are no irritant contaminants in office spaces _ only that, at the time of the investigations and with the state of the art measurements, rarely are high levels of toxic contamination found. The data presented have been difficult to analyze and interpret because they have been gathered in an unstandardized fashion by investigators with differing perceptions about the causes of the problems and degrees of interest; and important information is missing. These problems are multifac- torial and should be investigated using a standardized protocol that may in- volve the participation of physicians, industrial hygienists, architects, ven- tilation engineers and psychologists. Worker education about exposures, health effects and risk is also most important. The workers' input is impor- tant in solving the problems. Indoor air pollution problems usually cannot be resolved without the continuous involvement and cooperation of workers. - 29 - =a V. HEALTH HAZARDS IN THE OFFICE Roger E. Hallstein, Ph.D., CIH Continental Technical Services, Dallas, Texas Dr. Hallstein's presentation highlighted health hazards in the office. He discussed this area of concern from an industrial hygiene standpoint; the pre- vious speaker, a physician, dealt with the medical aspects. Introduction The scenario starts with the industrial hygienist getting a call for an office complaint. The complaint will fall into one of two categories. A spe- cific complaint that involves one or two specific symptoms, with one or two people being affected, is easy to handle since the industrial hygienist knows what samples to take. Generally, one gets the second type, a vague complaint; it is non- specific, and the symptoms are similar to many common ailments and usually involve alot of people. When the hygienist responds to the call, an initial walk- through to try and identify the problems is recommended. Problem Identification (Definite Cause and Effect) I. Chemical 1. Irritants - If there are complaints of irritation of either skin or mucous membranes, an investigation of chemicals that may be found in the office is begun. (a) Formaldehyde - sources: - urea formaldehyde insulation - particle board and paneling - new drapes and carpets Ask questions, e.g. Is this a new building? A new location? Has renova- tion work been completed recently? Are there new drapes or carpeting in the. office? - (b) Cigarette smoke - At present it is not known how to resolve this problem. Some offices have tried segregation of smokers and non - smokers. (c) Ozone - sources: - ultraviolet (uv) lights - copiers /photocopiers Measurements can be taken around the machine, but not at the workers brea- thing zone. If there are many copiers in one room with poor ventilation, there can be a potential for ozone exposure: (d) Polychlorinated 'U phenyls (PCB's) - sources: - 30 - - electrical transformers waterproof adhesives - various plastics There is no clear -cut evidence that PCB'.s.�.are found in the office environ- ment in normal circumstances. The problem arises when electrical transformers are damaged due to fire or explosion. If this chemical is suspected and if older equipment is in use, ask if there have been any electrical fires in the building. (e) Ammonia - sources: - cleaning agents -,blue print machines (draftsmen /illustrators) duplicating machines Ammonia is extremely irritating, causing burning and swelling of the air passages in the nose, throat and chest, and burning of the eye. 2. Non- Irritants (a) Carbon monoxide (CO) - sources: - outside air (automobile exhaust being drawn into building . ventilation systems) - underground garages - loading docks Symptoms of carbon monoxide exposure are dizziness and headaches. When sampling for CO in an office, an overexposure has never been found. b) Asbestos - sources: - ceiling material - pipe insulation - structural beam fireproofing Usually you can detect this by looking for a buildup of particles on desks or filing cabinets. When the office staff sees these white particles, they panic, feeling they are being exposed to asbestos. c) Nuisance Particulates d) Copier /toner Trinitrofluorenone (TNF) is a chemical that coats the printing drums in some copier models. In sampling done at various machines, no traces have been found. There may be a potential problem if the machine is not func- tioning correctly. It is suggested that these machines be operated in well ventilated rooms, contact with the toners be avoided, and machines be main - tained on a regular basis. - 31 - 3. Odors - they can be detected at low concentrations a) Auto exhaust - source: - parking garages An improperly designed ventilation system may have air brought into the building. b) Organic solvents - sources: - duplicating machines - cleaning fluids - cements - correcting fluids - drafting areas There may be overexposure to people in the area. These odors sometimes seep into other areas, and these people think that they are being exposed to organic solvents at harmful levels. c) p - Dichlorobenzene - source: - rest room deodorizers and sanitizers If there is no other known source of contamination, sample with charcoal tubes in the rest rooms. The. rest rooms are usually overlooked in a survey, but the deodorizers and sanitizers may be the problem. II. Heating and Air Conditioning System (HVAC) Uncomfortable temperature and humidity are a frequent complaint amongst office workers. More complaints have been voiced by workers as a result of recent energy conservation activities. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air - Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) has set guidelines to meet the challenges of energy efficiency and improved building ventilation. A bulletin by the Chemical and Environmental Science Committee will be published shortly listing these standards. Ventilation problems exist if air movement is too high (causing drafts) or too low (causing stagnant air). The amount of recirculated air in a building should also be checked. Some outside air systems have been shut down; there- fore, 100% of the air is recirculated. Stale cigarette odor being recircu- lated will compound the problem. . Micro- organisms within the system might be the source of a problem. This is usually found in a poorly maintained humidifier. III. Physical Hazards Many physical hazards may be found in the office environment. The "open office concept" accentuates many of these problems. - 32 - 1l i V.A.1 & VIII. A EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. June 9,-1987 Edina Public Library MEMBERS PRESENT: Joan Lonsbury, Jim Fee, Jean Rydell, Mac Thayer, Bill Lord, Bob Christianson, Andrew Montgomery MEMBERS ABSENT: Marilyn Wooldridge, Don Wineberg, James Moe STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Bill Bach, Stacey Kness OTHERS PRESENT: 15 Arneson Acres Park Neighbors Joan Lonsbury called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MAY 12, 1987 MEETING Jean Rydell MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 12, 1987, MEETING. Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. II. INDOOR PARK ORDINANCES (EDINBOROUGH PARK) Bob Kojetin stated that the City hired a security person for Edinborough; Bob Bramwell. The Edina Police Department set up the rules of how to enforce ordinances. Specific ordinances were set up because they are easier to enforce than policy. Mr. Kojetin asked for the Park Board's consensus of .opinion on-the drafted ordinances. (See attached.) After a recommendation from Park Board, the ordinances will go to the City Council for approval. Mrs. Lonsbury asked if Section 17 of the established park ordinances applies to the indoor parks. Mr. Kojetin said it will. Bill Lord asked Mr. Kojetin for his opinion of the ordinances. Mr. Kojetin is in agreement with the ordinances and said they could also be applied to other Edina park facilities such as the arena. Bill Lord MOVED TO ACCEPT THE INDOOR PARK ORDINANCES AS PRESENTED. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Kojetin distributed a Nine year Capital Plan and explained the changes made since the previous plan was made. (See attached.) He asked the Park Board to look at this plan in their spare time, and if they can think of other things in the park system they want on this.plan to bring them back to him. Mrs. Lonsbury asked if there had been any more discussion on the expansion of the arena. Mr. Kojetin and Mr. Keprios said there had been no more word on that project. Mr. Kojetin stated that in a 25 -year period his hope is that all the parks will be renovated and upgraded and the program will be continued. -1- � t IV. ARNESON ACRES PARK NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING (UPDATE) Mr. Kojetin distributed notes from the May 19 neighborhood meeting and highlighted the major concerns of the neighbors. (See attached.) Arneson Acres will be a formal, passive park. There is no other park like it in the community. When Mr. Arneson donated the property to the City, he did not specify exactly what he wanted or didn't want done. Mr. Kojetin stated that ginkgo trees were planted in the park as a historical addition to the gardens. Four of the existing park trees will have to be removed because of Dutch elm disease.- The Park Board had no comments on the neighborhood meeting notes. Mrs. Lonsbury asked the audience for comments. Katie Marxhausen, 4801 Larkspur Lane, said she has a quiet neighborhood now and is afraid that the walking path coming all the way to Larkspur Lane will create -too much traffic in her neighborhood. Her ten year old son told her._.he can't wait to ride his skateboard into the park. She is afraid that's what the path will do -- invite skateboards, bicycles, etc. into the park. Bill Lord said we have these same problems in all our other.parks. The rules would be enforced the same as the other parks. Ms. Marxhausen asked if signs could be posted limiting the parking on Larkspur Lane. Mr. Kojetin said the City could put -. signs on the park side of the road. Joan Carroll, 4909 Larkspur Lane, said her neighborhood is cut off from Cornelia and asked if a playground area could be added to the corner of Arneson Acres Park for the kids who aren't old enough to ride their bikes to the Cornelia playground. Mr. Kojetin said it seems that a lot of seniors are driving their grandchildren to the best playground areas, but he is open to suggestions. Joe Florenzano, 4712 West 70 Street,is one of several homeowners that surround the park. He commended Bob Kojetin on the notes from the original neighborhood meeting. Mr. Florenzano gave Mrs. Lonsbury a copy of a neighborhood petition and read Iit aloud to the Park Board. (See attached.) He also mentioned that several neighbors did not receive notice of the conditional use permit meeting. Mr. Kojetin explained this could have been because letters are mailed to the owners of the homes, not the renters. Everyone did receive a letter, informing them of the May 19 neighborhood meeting. Ron Rich, 7008 West Shore Drive, is happy about the gingkos being planted in an area that does not limit the open space. Mr. Rich is interested in knowing exactly what will happen now and what will happen in the future. Mr: Kojetin said right now they would be starting by moving the trees that are growing too close together. The continuation of the sidewalk on West 70 Street and the retaining wall would also happen soon. The retaining wall will look just the like one across the street. The neighbors' input will be given to James Robin, master plan architect, who will draw another plan incorporating their concerns. Athena Togas, 4808 Aspasia Lane, asked if there would be sliding in the wintertime at the park and what grading would be done. Mr..Kojetin said there are no plans for any grading to be done on the present plan except in the pond area. Cathy Rogan, 4720 West 70 Street, thinks the pond would increase mosquitoes and be a danger to the children. Mr. Kojetin said mosquitoes breed anywhere. The pond would be very shallow - -1 to 2 feet deep. He feels it is a very important feature to have in a formal garden. -2- V. Don Gjevre, 7016 West Shore Drive, asked if there would be any passive lighting added to the park. Mr. Kojetin said there has not be any lighting planned. Mr. Rich asked what will be put in the diseased elms' place. Mr. Kojetin said probably some of the trees that are being moved from other areas of the park. Mrs. Rogan asked if the neighbors would be notified of the changed master plan. Mr. Kojetin said there generally are no other planned meetings. Mr. Kojetin said the water feature probably wouldn't be added to the park for ten years. Phyllis Kenaston, Edina Garden Council, told the neighbors that the Garden Council, made up of many Edina residents, has been working closely in this master plan, therefore, the plan.has had input from neighbors since the beginning. Bob Christianson MOVED TO ADOPT THE MASTER PLAN AS PRESENTED INCLUDING THE CHANGE ELIMINATING PARKING OF BUSSES ON WEST 70TH STREET AND THAT A COMMITTEE BE FORMED CONSISTING OF MEMBERS OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, GARDEN COUNCIL, AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEMBERSHIP NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) TO BE SELECTED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP. Bill Lord seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RECREATION REPORT John Keprios distributed a tennis court resurfacing chart. (See attached.) He mentioned that the hard surface courts are in terrible shape, but there is not enough money right now to take care of them. T -ball registration is up this year with at least 186 boys and girls registered. Mr. Keprios showed the ad in the Sun Current for the Edina Municipal Pool. Ed MacHolda is excited about the ad and feels it will generate use. As indicated in the brochure, the pool is closing on August 17 as in other communities. In 1986, New Hope and Crystal closed August 16, St. Louis Park closed August 24, and Richfield, Eden Prairie, and Edina closed September 1. Jean Rydell thinks it is too early to close. Bill Lord thinks we should rely on Mr. MacHolda's judgement. Andy Montgomery would like to keep the flexibility of closing the 21st or the 23rd. Mr. Keprios also mentioned the upcoming First Annual Metro Pool Lifeguard Competition July 23. The neighbors of Arden Park are having their annual fund - raiser and would like the City to split the cost of a drinking fountain or lights at Arden Park. Mr. Lord recommended they pay for the total cost since the-Hockey Moms pay total costs. Mr. Keprios distributed a synopsis of costs for a Special Needs Program to answer Bob Christianson's questions from the May 12 Park Board meeting. (See attached.) Bill Bach reported the Edinborough Grand Opening was a tremendous success. They have 54 people in aerobics, and 35 to 40 people were eating their lunches while listening to a piano concert -- things are happening just the way they were planned. -3- VI. PARK BOARD CENTENNIAL (UPDATE) Mr. Kojetin distributed notes from the April 7, 1987, Park Board Centennial Month meeting. The fireworks were deleted from the plan. Mr. Kojetin has received permission from the Edina Fire Department to have a bonfire in the infield at Cornelia Park. Bob Christianson was appointed to the Bonfire, Christmas Trees committee with Bob Kojetin and Sherwin Plummer. The next meeting will be Tuesday, September 15, 1987, at 7 pm. All committee members are asked to bring a plan for their activity. VII. BRAEMAR INSPECTION TOUR The 22nd Annual Braemar Inspection Tour is scheduled for Tuesday, July 7. This will be the Grand Opening for the 9 -hole Executive Course. There will be a scramble on the front 9 the main course until 3:00 pm. Then there will be a shotgun on the 9 -hole Executive Course at 3:30 pm. At 6:30 pm there will.be a dinner. The bridge is installed. The greens and tees of the 9 -hole Executive Course are excellent -- better than Brooklyn Park's Edinburg. VIII.OTHER The MRPA has scheduled a tour of Edinborough on June 25 from 5 to 7 pm. A box dinner will be provided. The cost is $7. Joan Lonsbury and Mac Thayer will attend. Stacey will inform the absent Park Board members. Mrs. Lonsbury shared a thank you card she received from Jack and Patty Rice. They had a shelter dedication at Wooddale Park on May 31, and Mrs. Lonsbury represented the Park Board. Mr. Kojetin distributed the new Bredesen Park brochures made for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District tour, June 9, 1987. IX. ADJOURNMENT Bill Lord MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9:30 P.M. Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL: Bill Lord MOVED TO ACCEPT THE INDOOR PARK ORDINANCES AS PRESENTED. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Bob Christianson MOVED TO ADOPT THE MASTER PLAN AS PRESENTED INCLUDING THE CHANGE ELIMINATING PARKING OF BUSSES ON WEST 70TH STREET AND THAT A COMMITTEE BE FORMED CONSISTING OF MEMBERS OF THE HISTORICAL SOCIETY, GARDEN COUNCIL, AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THE NEIGHBORHOOD MEMBERSHIP NOT TO EXCEED THREE (3) TO BE SELECTED BY THE NEIGHBORHOOD GROUP. Bill Lord seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. -4- 10 io[9h(j1D):TSE:060587 ORDINANCE NO 1222— AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO DEFINE AND REGULATE USE OF PROGRAMMED PARKS The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. Sec. 17 of Ordinance No. 1222 is renumbered Sec. 18, and a new Sec. 17 is added to Ordinance No. 1222 as follows: Sec. 17. Programmed Parks. (a) Definition. A programmed park shall mean any enclosed public park in which activities are programmed or scheduled by, or under the supervision of, the Director of Parks, or his representative. This includes but is not limited to Edinborough Park. (b) Administration. (i) The Director of Parks, or his representative, may close all or portions of the park to public use, or restrict all or portions of the park to public access, to accommodate programmed or scheduled activities. (ii) The Director of Parks, or his representative, may adopt rules and regulations for the use and operation of a programmed park consistent with this ordinance, and other applicable ordinances of the City. (c) Prohibited Acts. In a programmed park no person shall: (i) Act in a manner that is disruptive or distracting to programmed or scheduled activities. (ii) Use the park or any equipment therein in a manner inconsistent with the programmed or scheduled activities. (iii) Physically obstruct free passage on walkways and paths within the park. (iv) Run or move rapidly along walkways or pathways within the park in a manner that would interfere with sedentary. use of the park or would be disruptive or dangerous to pedestrian traffic within the park. (v) Be or remain within the park before or after posted hours of operation without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. (vi) Be or remain within any area of the park closed to public use without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. 7629h(31D):TSE:060587 (vii) Walk, run, climb, sit, stand or be physically present in any area designed for or planted with vegetation, or be in any water area or other area not designed for human activity. (viii) Use any electric sound receiving, transmission or reproducing device in such a manner as to annoy or .disturb persons within the park, or disturb or interfere with programmed or scheduled activities. (ix) Use or consume alcoholic beverages contrary to any ordinance of the City or contrary to any rules and regulations related thereto; or contrary to any license or lease by which the user or consumer is within the park. (x) Use or consume alcoholic beverages not dispensed by a person or group duly licensed by the City to use the park. (xi) Use tobacco in any form. (xii) Operate skateboards, roller skates, bicycles, scooters, or similar vehicles or devices, unless part of a programmed or scheduled activity. (xiii) Act disorderly, as defined by Ordinance No. 1001. (xiv) Trespass, as defined by Ordinance No. 1001. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in on Attest: City Clerk Mayor EDINA PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT NINE YEAR CAPITAL PLAN 1987 - 1995 ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION ----- -------------------- ---- - - -- -- CODE --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COST 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 GENERAL FUND Parks: 44th St.:fencing & planting R&T 10,000 $ 10 Additional & new playground areas & equipment - all sites R&T 45,000 $ 45 Arneson Acres upgrade in large greenhouse R&T 30,000 $ 30 Braemar complex: football /soccer regrade & widen move lights R&T 50,000 50 Bridge R&T 35,000 35 Chowen:curbing, backstop & fencing R&T 8,000 $ 8 Contingency R&T 5,000 5 Creek Valley School: Light tennis courts R&T 6,000 6 Fencing & planting R&T 10,000 10 Regrade R&T 9,000 9 Garden Park: Hockey boards & planting R&T 11,000 $ 11 Light tennis courts R&T 6,000 6 Heights: Backstop R&T 2,000 $ 2 Lake Edina: Light tennis courts R&T 6,000 $ 6 Parking lot improvements R&T 6,000 .6 Regrade & irrigate ballfield R&T 3,000 3 Fencing R&T 6,000 6 Playground equipment R&T 12,000 12 Pamela Park upgrade R&T 10,000 10 Shelter Buildings: Garden Park R&T 150,000 75 75 Walnut Ridge R&T 100,000 100 Strachauer: Parking lot R&T 10,000 $ 10 Tennis courts R&T 20,000 20 Todd: Benches, plantings & drainage R&T 5,000 $ 5 Renovation, parking & house removal R&T 50,000 25 $ 25 Van Valkenburg: Improvements R&H 375,000 $125 $125 $125 Backstops & fencing R&T 27,000 20 7 Walnut Ridge: Upgrade & building R&T 22,000 22 Weber: Regrade repair R&T 8,000 8 Wooddale School: Demolition - building B 75,000 25 25 25 Improvements R&T 50,000 50 Yorktown: Renovation - dugouts, fencing, team benches & planting R&T 31,000 $ 31 Light tennis courts R&T 10,000 10 TOTAL PARKS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $1,213,000 $305 $279 $158 $ 32 $ 58 $108 $126 $117 $ 30 1 1 ESTIMATED DESCRIPTION ------------------------------ CODE COST 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 - - - - -- GENERAL FUND:FACILITIES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MMING POOL Replacement of boards R $ 5,000 $ 5 Replace filter system R 40,000 $ 40 Renovation pool R 60,000 60 Seal parking lots R 10,000 $ 10 Lights R 7,000 $ 7 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 122,000 $ 5 $100 $ 10 $ 7 ART CENTER Building renovation R $ 63,000 $ 10 $ 12 $ 5 $ 36 TOTAL ART CENTER ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 63,000 $ 10 $ 12 $ 5 $ 36 GUN RANGE Trap house R $ 10,000 $ 10 Trap equipment R 5,000 $ 5 Equipment pistol range R 5,000 $ 5 Renovation building R 25,000 $ 25 Target equipment R 4,000 $ 4 TOTAL GUN RANGE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 49,000 $ 10 $ 5 $ 5 $ 25 $ 4 RECREATION CENTER (ARENA) Floor R $ 5,000 $ 5 Furnace R 23,000 $ 23 Recondition icemaking equipment R 20,000 $ 20. Ice resurfacer R 50,000 $ 50 Floor pavilion R 73,000 $ 73 Balcony & sidewalls in pavilion R 100,000 $100 Glass boards R 20,000 $ 10 $ 10 Recondition pavilion R 24,000 $ 24 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL RECREATION CENTER (ARENA) $ 315,000 $ 5 $ 23 $ 20 $ 50 $ 73 $100 $ 10 $ 10 $ 24 GOLF COURSE Driving range building E $ 125,000 $125 Dredging ponds E 45,000 $ 45 Parking lot E 35,000 $ 35 Upgrade old clubhouse E 45,000 $ 45 Bridge replacement -hole 17 & 18 E 45,000 $ 45 Resurface cart paths E 50,000 $ 50 TOTAL GOLF COURSE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $ 345,000 $125 $ 45 $ 35 $ 45 $ 45 $ 50 TOTAL FACILITIES $ 20 $ 38 $ 25 $150 $120 $109 $ 46 $ 17 $ 24 TOTAL PARKS & FACILITIES $325 $317 $183 $182 $178 $217 $172 $124 $ 54 ARNESON ACRES MEETING WITH NEIGHBORS TUESDAY, MAY 19, 1987, 7:00 P.M. ARNESON ACRES PARK In Attendance:. Joan Lonsbury, Bob Kojetin, James Robin, master plan architect, Stacey Kness, 42 neighbors and members of the Master Plan Committee. Introduction by Mrs. Lonsbury. Background by Bob Kojetin. Explanation of master plan by James Robin. Comments made by neighbors: - do not want school busses dropping children off on West 70th - want the dense trees kept in front of the Arneson house facing West 70th concerned about pedestrian access from Larkspur Lane - possibly not continue the walking path all the way to the street - cars would be parking on Larkspur Lane and creating too much traffic - add a street light on Larkspur Lane near the pedestrian access - concerned about the present open space being filled in by trees - concerned about the children not being able to have sliding hills due to added trees and a water feature - very concerned about the water feature - dangerous to children - it would eliminate sliding on the steepest hill - have a very shallow lake - concerned about the perimeter planting - do not want it too dense to block their view of the park - party nearest the present Arneson home very concerned with the nearness of the proposed expansion on the existing home - concerned about adding leafy trees to the park - would like to keep them all conifers - agreeable with school busses using the turnaround by the greenhouse - agreeable with a rule of no dogs allowed in the park A consensus of the over group was that they enjoyed the concept but were invividually concerned about specifics that pertained to their property. Meeting adjourned 9 p.m. Petition opposing new construction to the Arneson home, development of .a pond on the Arneson property and parking of buses /cars on West 70th Street abutting Arneson property To The Honorable City Council City of Edina, Minnesota - We the undersigned, are all owners of real property within 500 feet of the Arneson Acres Park, which is the location of proposed improvements consisting of new construction to the existing home, development of a pond on the property, parking areas along a sidewalk on West 70th Street, in addition to the-development of landscaping and several walkways, statues, etc, on the Arnescn property. 'We respectfully petition the Council, as homeowners, taxpayers, and concerned citizens of Edina to prevent specifically (a) any organization from constructing any new addition to the existing Arneson Home (b) from constructing a pond that would.be dangerous for neighboring children in-creating an attractive nuisance on the property and increasing the city of Edina's potential 'liability (c) creating for and allowing the parking of buses and /or cars along a proposed sidewalk on West 70th Street near the Arneson property. We realize the Council may have already given preliminary approval to some of the renovations to the property, but the three improvements specifically addressed in the petition would be detrimental to abutting property owners of Arneson Acres Park. Additionally, it is our belief that some homeowners abutting the Arneson property were never provided the required Notice of a Public Hearing concerning this matter. We therefore request the Council's immediate attention to our concerns as stated in this petition. NAME g"Y_2Z ADDRESS DATE y7/-�Z W. -2o7"�O s 7- CAI -folk 14A1,. ``\ �YG _y1(�, ✓ter Lla t� ADDRESS 61-7d 1 0. Y,, YV 6%- W. Sdftt Dr. e-/ ra. r e�< -7 `moo U3, 7o 142, DATE J" Z -21?7 Av 5 /-c-)- 71,87 Slz7��r Or 7, 67 5 1137 NAME Ile Clot" Cut Jae, k1l C- 4,11. 1" vm, I t ADDRESS 4-7 Lo -)� - 7 4"7A d �- 7 1191 .Z - 7 0 Ord � W.7m� 7 - 7b 707 wg7 ;;;0' A5- �d s rod w, 7a'- DATE 6--.% A-P7 S--114,-e7 5 -z -( -87 G -Zf - 3? sz� 8� lrl,7 Petition opposing new construction to the Arneson home, development of a pond on the Arneson property and parking of buses /cars on West 70th Street abutting Arneson property To The Honorable City Council City of Edina, Minnesota We the undersigned, are all owners of real property within 500 feet of the Arneson Acres Park, which is the location of proposed improvements consisting of new construction to the existing home, development of a pond on the property, parking areas along a sidewalk on West 70th Street, in addition to the development of landscaping and several walkways, statues, etc, on the Arneson property. We respectfully petition the Council, as homeowners, taxpayers, and concerned citizens of Edina to prevent specifically (a) any organization from constructing any new addition to the existing Arneson Home (b) from constructing a pond that would be dangerous for neighboring children in creating an attractive nuisance on the property and increasing the city of Edina's.potential liability (c) creating for and allowing the parking of buses and /or cars along a proposed sidewalk on West 70th Street near the Arneson property. We realize the Council may have already given preliminary approval to some of the renovations to the property, but the three improvements specifically addressed in the petition would be detrimental to abutting property owners of Arneson Acres Park. Additionally, it is our belief that some homeowners abutting the Arneson property were never provided the required Notice of a Public Hearing concerning this matter. We therefore request the Council's immediate attention to our concerns as stated in this petition. NAME ADDRESS 71 of DATE f3� �r Petition opposing new construction to the Arneson home, development of a pond on the Arneson property and parking of buses /cars on West 70th Street abutting Arneson property To The Honorable City Council City of Edina, Minnesota We the undersigned, are all owners of real property within 500 feet of the Arneson Acres Park, which is the location of proposed improvements consisting of new construction to the existing home, development of a pond on the property, parking areas along a sidewalk on West 70th Street, in addition to the development of landscaping and several walkways, statues, etc, on the Arneson property. We respectfully petition the Council, as homeowners, taxpayers, and concerned citizens of Edina to prevent specifically (a) any organization from constructing any new addition to the existing Arneson Home (b) from constructing a pond that would be dangerous for neighboring children in creating an attractive nuisance on the property and increasing the city of Edina's potential liability (c) creating for and allowing the parking of buses and /or cars along a proposed sidewalk on West 70th Street near the Arneson property. We realize the Council may have already given preliminary approval to some of the renovations to the property, but the three improvements specifically addressed in the petition would be detrimental to abutting property owners of Arneson Acres Park. Additionally, it is our belief that some homeowners abutting the Arneson property were never provided the required Notice of a Public Hearing concerning this matter. We therefore request the Council's immediate attention to our concerns as stated in this petition. NAME ADDRESS DATE 71 % CcJ- a- at.�.�. 0-Y S- 3/- "P7 Petition opposing new construction to the Arneson home, development of a pond on the Arneson property and parking of buses /cars on West 70th Street abutting Arneson property To The Honorable City Council City of Edina, Minnesota We the undersigned, are all owners of real property within 500 feet of the Arneson Acres Park, which is the location of proposed improvements consisting of new construction to the existing home, development of a pond on the property, parking areas along a sidewalk on West 70th Street, in addition to the development of landscaping and several walkways, statues, etc, on the Arneson property. We respectfully petition the Council, as homeowners, taxpayers, and concerned citizens of Edina to prevent specifically (a) any organization from constructing any new addition to the existing Arneson Home (b) from constructing a pond that would be dangerous for neighboring children in creating an attractive nuisance on the property and increasing the city of Edina's potential liability (c) creating for and allowing the parking of buses and /or cars along a proposed sidewalk on West 70th Street near the Arneson property. We realize the Council may have already given preliminary approval to some of the renovations to the property, but the three improvements specifically addressed in the petition would be detrimental to abutting property owners of Arneson Acres Park. Additionally, it is our belief that some homeowners abutting the Arneson property were never provided the required Notice of a Public Hearing concerning this matter. We therefore request the Council's immediate attention to our concerns as stated in this petition. iNA ME ADDRESS DATE ucc NAME 'Woo 40 ADDRESS DATE Tennis Courts - Resurfacing Schedule Year Current Prior to Built Condition 1984 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1971 1 Braemar G 1983 X .1963 2 Cornelia School 1977 REBUILT 1972 3 Cornelia Pool � - X 1974. 4 Countryside X 1969 5 Creek Valley r 1977,81 X X 1967 6 Garden 1982 X 1963 7 Highlands 1977 X 1974 8 Lake Edina X 1987 9 Lewis F NEW ` COURTS 1963 10 Normandale 1981 X 1966 11 Pamela �, 1977 X 1974 12 Todd 7 X 1966 13 Utley F 1977 X 1974 14 Walnut Ridge 7 X 1968 15 Weber 1978: X j 1973 16 Yorktown r X E = excellent Very few or no cracks, good paint and lines. G = good Hair -line cracks, level suface, fair paint and lines. P = poor Cracks, bird baths, faded paint and lines (needs resurfacing). T = terrible Needs to be torn out and rebuilt. Comments: SPECIAL NEEDS PROGRAM PROPOSAL STATISTICS Currently the Bloomington /Richfield Adaptive Recreation Program has a total of 750 (not duplicated) participants of all ages. Approximately 200 are non - residents. The total annual budget.for the cooperative program is $139,000 ($49, 500 - Richfield, $90,000- Bloomington). The cost per participant is roughly $185.00 per participant. Edina currently has.387 residents between the age 0 to 21 that have a disability. The total number of disabled adults (over 21) in Edina is very difficult to ascertain. There -is a movement to track students after high school as of this year, otherwise, there are no available data on disabled adults. With Edina's contribution of $23,000 toward the Adapti.ve Recreation Program, a $185 per participant would require 124 participants.of all ages. 124 is only 32% of the total youth dis- abled population in Edina and that does not include any adults. Assumino that only 90 youth (23 %) participate and an estimated 34 adults participate, the $185 would be accurate. It was suggested by Lil Hipp, Richfield Community Center Director, that a very high cost per .participant ratio was experienced in the beginning years of the Richfield and Bloomington Adaptive Recreation Programs, however, the current figure of $185 per participant has been the norm in recent years. It is hoped that the implementation of this new program will not adversd y affect other existing recreation programs financially. The City Council will most likely determine the manner and source of 'funding. Submitted by, John Keprios FEBRUARY Centennial Park Board Month Notes from April 7, 1987, Meeting ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 13, 1988 1. Ice Castle on the Lakeshore Bob Kojetin, Sherwin Plummer, Bill Bryan, Foster Dunwiddie - start building early January enclose shelter to create warming house to be used all winter possibly model castle after Mr. Dunwiddie's photos of Edinborough Castle, Scotland proposed size: 25' high, 50' square using 18" square blocks 2. Snow and Ice Sculptures Jean Rydell, Bill Cole - judging Friday, February 12 - sculptures on display along walkways - use colored-ribbons attached to winning sculptures - actual sculpting done during the week 3. Novice Speed Skating & 10K Skate Mac Thayer, Marilyn Wooldridge, Bill Farrell - lay out track right on Lake Cornelia 4. Bandy Game - morning Don Wineberg, John Keprios - 3 games could be played without sweeping ice - enough teams to conduct mini tournament if time allows 5. Sleigh Rides Ed MacHolda - recommended only on Saturday, not on Sunday - $400 for 4 hours of rides - sleigh should be reserved right after the September meeting 6. Bonfire, Christmas Trees, Fireworks Bob Kojetin, Sherwin Plummer - possibly have bonfire in the infield of softball field - have residents donate used Christmas trees for atmosphere in the park - if we have fireworks, it would be from the same people that do them on the Fourth 7. Overnight Winter Camping Ardythe Buerosse - campers can pitch tents anywhere in the park on a flat area - keep tents away from bonfire ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 1988. 1. Alumni Hockey Game - Braemar Jim Fee, Larry Thayer - games to include "old timers" up to current alumnis - probably divide players into teams of 5 -year spans 2. Figure Skating Exhibition Dede Hensel - between periods of alumni hockey game or between games - start scheduling in September - combined with Alumni Hockey Game will be a full day 3. Medallion Hunt in the Park Andy Montgomery - $100 cash prize - hide clues OTHER ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 1988 AT EDINBOROUGH. 1. Square Dancing - February 21 Bob & Arlene Jacobson - Colonial Square Dance Club will send flyers to other dance clubs - dance held from 2 - 4 pm Sunday afternoon 2. Quilt & Fiber Display Eva Bryan. - display items from February 1 - 29 3. Bridge Tournament - February 5 Janet Baker, Marion Bredehoft - held from 10 am to 3 pm limit of 252 participants will have to rent at least 60 card tables 4. Chess Tournament - Feb 12, 13, 14 Nels Truelson - 95th Annual Minnesota State Open Chess Championship - Feb 12: 7 pm - midnight; Feb 13: 10 am to midnight; Feb 14: 11 am to 6 pm up to 300 players using 50 8 -foot tables - will have to rent 30 8 -foot tables - have prizes for i.e. Best Performance of Edina resident NOTES: 1. The City will be responsible for maintenance of Edinborough for all activities. 2. Joan Lonsbury will contact Mr. and Mrs. Jacobson, Eva Bryan, Marion Bredehoft, and Nels Truelson with prices of Edinborough facility. 3. Committee members should keep close track of any volunteers' names to be included in the Finale Party in December. 4. Encourage neighbors, etc. to volunteer to bring everyone together. ** NEXT MEETING: TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 1987, 7:00 PM Members present: Members absent: Others present: SECTION A MINUTES VIII.B. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE JUNE 9 ,1987 9:00 A. M. Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson Lois Coon Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. NONE. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. 1. Discuss truck traffic concerns on Lincoln Drive and County Road 18. Requested by John B. Keefe, Commissioner,: Hennepin.County. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman opened the discussion by stating .a request had been received to ban all truck traffic in the 300 block of Washington Avenue due to the amount of noise generated by trucks going to Super .Valu from the interchange of County Road 18 and 7th Street during early - morning hours. He also commented this was not possible 'due to the use of State aid funds on Lincoln Drive south of Maloney Avenue. Captain Kleven reported the Traffic Enforcement Unit has responded to complaints of trucks speeding and overweight violations in this area. Seven citations and one warning have been issued to speeders, but none of the trucks were in violation. No overweight violations were found, however, several trucks do use this roadway to access Super Valu during early - morning hours. Mr. Swanson suggested the City should not attempt to legislate the use of this roadway, but recommended contacting the primary users and seek.voluntary compliance. Mr. Hoffman further stated, if signed, the trucks could travel a parallel route, thereby shifting the problem to another street. Mr. Swanson moved the Committee make no recommendation for a regulatory. act, but that a letter be drafted to Super Valu and Hennepin County encouraging their use of the Excelsior Blvd. exit for trucks. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. 2. Discuss request for "DEER CROSSING" signs on Vernon Avenue at entrance to Fountainwoods Condominiums. Traffic Safety Committee Minutes • Page 2 June 9, 1987 Requested by Marion Kloster, 6730 Vernon Avenue. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven reported the request involved two incidents near the entrance to Fountainwoods Condominiums where deer allegedly ran into the fence surrounding the housing project and had to be removed with human assistance. Police records do not reflect any reported accidents involving deer struck by vehicles on this street, however, there have. been 22 accidents involving deer struck by vehicles on the Crosstown Highway between County Road 18 and Gleason Road between October 1987 and May 1987. MNDOT officials are researching this area for deer - related accidents in anticipation of posting "DEER CROSSING" signs.. Mr. Hoffman voiced concern about the precedence and criteria for posting local streets for wildlife crossings due to numerous other locations involving ducks and geese. Mr. Hughes questioned the impact of such a sign in a 30- mile - per - hour residential area. Mr. Hughes moved to deny the request for signing on Vernon Avenue and suggested the City follow -up with MNDOT for signing on Highway 169 as it runs concurrently with the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Discuss traffic safety concerns on County.Road 18, north of Interstate 494. Requested by Captain Kleven, Police Department ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven advised the Committee that this section of roadway has been identified as the worst accident site in the metro area freeway system. The Traffic Enforcement Unit has issued 163 speeding citations since January 1, 1987, with the average violator's speed in excess of 70 miles per hour. Since January 1, 1983, the police have reported 107 accidents between the Crosstown Highway and Interstate 494. Mr. Hoffman and Captain Kleven met with Dennis Hansen, County•Traffic Engineer, on March 24, 1987 and discussed several proposed solutions (see attachment). Mr. Hoffman recently talked to Mr. Hansen about the situation and was advised they were still working on the issues. Mr. Hoffman moved that the Committee recommend the City Council pass a resolution requesting Hennepin County provide a safety solution to this dangerous roadway. Alison Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. Respectfully submitted, Edina Traffic Safety Committee r' 19 E M O R A N D U M TO: Chief Craig Swanson FROM: Captain Leonard Kleven. DATE:. March 27, 1987 SUBJECT: Hennepin County Road 18 Fran Hoffman and I met with Dennis Hansen, Hennepin,County Traffic Engineer, on March 24, 1987 regarding County Road 18...The section of- roadway. between Interstate 494 and County Road 62 has been identified as having the highest accident rate of any Twin Cities area freeway per 100 million vehicle miles driven. The vast majority of accidents in this area consist of rear —end. collisions for southbound traffic due to vehicles slowing and stopping for the signal lights at Interstate 494. Several proposed solutions were discussed with Mr. Hansen, including: Designating and signing the roadway as an "ACCIDENT REDUCTION ZONE ". * Re— designing the interchange of 494 and 18. Lowering the speed limit to 45 miles per hour. Placing "rumble strips" on southbound lanes. * Placing a cautionary "PREPARE TO STOP WHEN LIGHTS ARE FLASHING" sign for southbound traffic. Placing a "CONGESTION AHEAD"-electric sign, with sensors, for southbound traffic. * Installing a "Message Board" with various traffic status messages for southbound traffic. * Placing additional signing for southbound traffic advising the proper lane usage for various turns at the 494 interchange. Mr. Hansen agreed to consider these proposals. He also indicated he would be checking with authorities at Minnesota Department of Transportation to determine how they have reacted to this type of situation. The Edina Police Traffic. Enforcement Unit is aggressively enforcing speed laws in this area but the impact appears to be minimal. The average speed of cited violators is 69 miles per hour on this section of roadway. Concentrated enforce- ment will continue in an attempt'.to reduce accidents and increase public aware- ness. Leonard Kleven Captain EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT PPgOT TTTTl1N WHEREAS, County Road 18 between Valley View Road and I -494 is a county facility with a particularly high frequency of accidents on the southbound lanes; and WHEREAS, the City Traffic Enforcement Unit has issued.163 speeding citations since January 1, 1987, with the average violator's speed in excess of 70 mph; and WHEREAS,, the City Traffic Safety Committee has reviewed the highway section as to safety concerns and found that accident and speed problems exist; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request Hennepin County to provide a safety solution to an ever increasing problem. ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1987. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 15, 1987, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 29th day of June, 1987. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk VIII. C. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City Sanitarian, SUBJECT: Smoking Policy for Edina City Properties DATE: June 11, 1987 The Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act prohibits smoking in public places, including places of work. This prohibition does not apply to private social functions, private office occupied by one person or private offices occupied exclusively by smokers. The Act does permit a responsible person .in charge of a place of work the option of designating smoking permitted areas within the building. The smoking permitted and no smoking areas must comply with specific requirements contained within the regulation. Edina city buildings are designated as follows: City Hall - Smoking prohibited except where designated. Some private offices and a portion of the lunchroom are designated smoking permitted. Liquor Store - Smoking prohibited. Fire Station - Smoking prohibited except where designated. The buildings listed above have signs at the public entrance stating that either smoking is prohibited or that smoking is prohibited except in designated smoking permitted areas. The Public Works building should be evaluated and appropriate areas designated to permit smoking if desirable. An appropriate sign should be posted at the entrance indicating the smoking status for that building. With the exception of the Public Works building, the City properties are in compliance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. I did not address the Park Department.buildings because I understand those buildings will be addressed separately. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 p.m. Aay_12, 1987 Braemar Clubhouse MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: VIII. C. Joan Lonsbury...Don Wineberg, Bob Christianson, Jim Fee, Bill Lord, James Moe, Andy Montgomery, Jean Rydell, Marilyn Wooldridge Mac Thayer OTHERS PRESENT: Lillian Hipp, Richfield Community Center Manager, Deb Backstrom, Bloomington Adaptive Recreation Supervisor, Golf Course patrons. STAFF PRESENT: Bob Kojetin, John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, John Valliere, Lucy Rosche, Stacey Kness The Park Board attended a j ointineeting with the City Council, the Planning Commission, and United Properties developers at 5 p.m. to discuss the contemplated plans for the Hedberg Property. Joan Lonsbury called the Park Board meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF APRIL 14, 1987 Jean Rydell MOVED TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES OF THE APRIL 14, 1987, MEETING. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. II. ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM PRESENTATION John Keprios introduced the two speakers and gave a brief background of the Bloomington Richfield Adaptive Recreation Program. Mr. Keprios feels it is to the best interest of the City of Edina to join forces with Eden Prairie and the existing Bloomington Richfield Adaptive Recreation Program to contract with them to provide Edina with services for its special needs population.. Edina cannot do it on its own. Mr. Keprios and Lil Hipp, Richfield Community Center Manager, started the video tape which featured the participants in the existing Bloomington Richfield program. Ms. Hipp explained the philosophy of the program is that it is a stepping stone. The participants can take the program as far as they want to with segregated and /or integrated opportunities. The current program has 600 participants in the two cities. There are 36 different programs a year. The children's social skills are concentrated on - -not their I.Q.'s. - 1 - Ms. Hipp explained the three benefits of having a cooperative venture are programatic, if four cities get together and use the input from all the parents and participants, the program will better reflect the needs of the children; financial, four cities together will have a larger budget; and easier to get services from the county, four cities,will have more pull in bringing the county services to the suburbs. Another benefit of Edina having its own program is there would be no non - resident fee. Deb talked about the advisory group which is made up of representatives from each community. The group meets three times per year and uses the comments and input of each community to put together programs to meet everyone's needs. Mr. Keprios proposed that a full -time staff person be hired to serve both Edina and Eden Prairie on a contracted basis. Bob Christianson asked how many people responded to Mr. Keprios' survey sent out earlier in the year. Mr. Keprios said he received a 39 percent return on the survey sent to all parents of special needs children in Edina. Bob Kojetin said the staff highly recommends the program, but it needs support from the Park Board and Human Relations Board. Mr. Keprios said the desire to have a program in Edina is really coming from the parents. Don Wineberg feels the venture seems to be more effective than beginning a program on our own. Mr. Kojetin said the program will grow and not diminish. James Moe asked if the budget could be shared with Community Education. Ms. Hipp explained that the Adaptive Recreation Program and Richfield Community education work together in the fact that their programs do not overlap, but they work under separate budgets. Mr. Keprios will give this presentation to the Human Relations board next month. If a program is started in Edina, it would begin January 1988. Andy Montgomery MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE COUNCIL THAT WE INCLUDE IN THE 1988 BUDGET AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $25,000 FOR THE PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT TO ENTER A JOINT VENTURE WITH EDEN PRAIRIE FOR AN ADAPTIVE RECREATION PROGRAM. Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. BOB CHRISTIANSON OPPOSED THE MOTION. Mr. Christianson asked what the cost per person is and what effect the amount for this program will have on the other programs that are already stretched to the limits. Mr. Keprios will provide this information to Mr. Christianson. III. ARNESON ACRES PARK The Arneson Acres master plan will be discussed at a neighborhood meeting on Tuesday, May 19, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. A letter and copy of the master plan was sent to all neighbors within 500 feet of the property line inviting them to this meeting. The presidents of the Historical Society and the Garden Council are also invited. After this meeting, the plan will go back to the Council, and Bob Kojetin will recommend that the Park and Recreation Department use $35,000 of the developers fund, which is about $300,000, for funding the first phase of remodeling of the house. - 2 - TV. SMOKE FREE PARK BUILDINGS In November when the no smoking at Braemar Arena and Pavilion was approved, the Council asked the staff to study this and come back with a report in regards to smoking in Edina park buildings. (See attached list of Edina Park Buildings.) The Art Center is planning to discuss the smoking issue at their May 21 meeting. The Art Center seems to be in agreement with the no smoking policy especially because of the paintings on display in the small area. There is presently no smoking inside the dome, but the staff recommends no smoking in the office /entry area. During the time the dome in not operated by the City, the smoking policies will be up to the private sector. There seems to be no problem in having the Gun Range smoke free. It is recommended that the baseball complex be treated like warming house building. Golf Course Maintenance Building should not allow smoking. Edina Public Works should have the same smoking policy as the maintenance building. There seems to be no problem having the pool smoke free. The Senior Center needs more studying. There has been no response yet from the seniors. Art center, baseball complex, gun range, golf dome, pool. Bob Christianson asked who are we dealing with in these facilities? When we are talking about the City .employees - -it should be a City decision. If it affects the public in some ways, then the Park Board can decide especially if it is a safety control issue. Does the Park Board want to recommend rules that will be violated without being enforced? For example, if the Golf Dome is dependent on revenue generated by users, will a smoking restriction reduce revenue? (James Moe arrived 7:50.) John Valliere stated he is sensitive to Bob.Christianson's comments. It is a small area and the smoking issue could be a problem. He would rather defer to the private sector and let them make the decision. Joan Lonsbury asked whose rights are being violated? Bob Christianson stated there is a difference between a building being "smoke free" and abiding with the state law that says there has to be some area for no smoking. Jim Fee said a facility could comply with the law but not be totally smoke free. Bill Lord proposed that the Park Board go through each facility and make a specific decision. Discussion on smoking policy at Braemar Clubhouse: State law (see enclosed) states that 30 percent of a restaurant area has to be no smoking. There is no state law governing the banquet area. John Valliere distributed "Braemar Golf Course Smoking Regulations and Recommendations ". (Andy Montgomery arrived 8:05.) - 3 - I' Comments -on Mr. Valliere's recommendations included: Bob Christianson said Fred Richards is concerned about the revenue generating capacity. Jim Fee said #4 should be no smoking. There will be enough smoking areas. John Valliere said the grill has designated smoking and no smoking areas. The ladies do socialize in their private room. There has been a complaint about smoking in designated grill, mixed lounge, hall, and Braemar Room during private parties. Grill is 50 -50. Braemar Room is no smoking during public meetings. Don Wineberg said try it for a while and if things change, we should adhere to the people that are using the facility. John Valliere said the guidelines already reflect the constituents' views. Audience comments: Dick Haffner likes the guidelines but would like to have the mixed lounge be no smoking and the private rooms be smoking. Sandy Feese is having a- wedding reception in the Braemar Room in August and likes the fact that the party can .decide what they want. Jim Lesniack agrees with Mr. Haffner on having the mixed room be no smoking and the mens' and womens' lounges be smoking. There seems to be fewer smokers now. Gordy Schonecker doesn't like to be in the mens' lounge because of the smoke. If the Arena is no smoking, why can't this building be also? Joan Lonsbury said go with John Valliere's original recommendations. Bob Christianson MOVED THAT THE "BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE RULES AND RECOMMENDATIONS" AS SET UP BY JOHN VALLIERE BE ADOPTED. Don Wineberg seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. V. PARK BOARD POLICIES ON DRUGS AND ALCOHOL USE The Park Board's policy is the same as the State High School statutes. Park Board passed this drug policy December 11, 1985. The policy is for those who are 19 and under. On the first offense they lose their eligibility for the next two games or two weeks of the season, whichever is greater. They must also visit the Edina chemical health counselor. On the second offense they lose their eligibility for a minimum of six games or four weeks of the season whichever is greater. They must also visit the Edina chemical health counselor. On the third offense they lose their eligibility for all youth programs for one year. If they go to a treatment program for six weeks, they can get back into the youth programs. All the athletic associations have adopted these rules and abide them. (Copy attached.) Facilities Policies on Drugs and Alcohol Use: There is no smoking or drinking in any of the warming house areas. Bob Christianson asked if the associations follow through with the penalties? John Keprios said they all have adopted the policies and abide by them. Since these rules are important for the parents and kids to know as well as coaches and board members, Don Wineberg MOVED THAT CURRENT RULES ON DRUGS, TOBACCO, AND ALCOHOL FOR ALL ATHLETIC GROUPS BE INCLUDED ON THE SCHEDULES AND /OR ROSTERS. Jim Fee seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. VI. RECREATION REPORT Edina Youth Softball Association registration dropped 53 kids. The 11th and 12th graders are just not signing up. Mr. Keprios thinks it is due to natural attrition of kids that age. There was a new policy adopted at the last Hockey Association meeting for use of Braemar Arena. In the past season, coaches used ice time without paying at the time of use. Sometimes they even reserved ice and did not show up to use it. Larry Thayer, Manager of Braemar Arena, totaled all these unpaid ice hours and charged the Edina Hockey Association. EHA did not think this was fair. Their new policy is that Braemar Arena treat the EHA coaches just like any other city's coaches i.e. do not let them use the ice without paying for it in advance. - 4 - 0 VII. ADJOURNMENT Bill Lord MOVED TO ADJOURN AT 9:25 P.M. Jean Rydell seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. - ITEMS FOR COUNCIL APPROVAL: Bill Lord MOVED TO GO ALONG WITH THE ART BOARD DECISION AS TO A SMOKING POLICY AT THE ART CENTER. Don Wineberg second the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Bill Lord MOVED TO HAVE SMOKING IN DESIGNATED AREAS ONLY IN THE BASEBALL COMPLEX BUILDING. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Bob Kojetin recommended that the designated no smoking area be the control booth on the second floor. Jim Fee MOVED THAT THE GUN RANGE BE SMOKE FREE. Don Wineberg seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Don Wineberg MOVED TO HAVE SMOKING IN DESIGNATED AREAS ONLY IN THE ENTRY /OFFICE AREA OF THE GOLF DOME BETWEEN JUNE 1 AND DECEMBER 31. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Jean Rydell MOVED TO HAVE THE EDINA MUNICIPAL POOL SMOKE FREE. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Jim Fee MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE EDINA SENIOR CLUB THAT THEY ADOPT A SMOKING POLICY. Bob Christianson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ** PLEASE SEE PAGE 6 FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION ** owl= 1 `:Y 1987 PARK BOARD ACOMMENDED POLICY EDINA PARK AND RECREATION BUILDINGS SMOKING POLICIES -- APPROVED AND RECOMMENI PREVIOUSLY APPROVED POLICY PARK BUILDING ADDRESS No Smoking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Art Center 4701 West 64 Street No Smoking Braemar Arena 7501 County Road 18 No Smoking Braemar Pavilion 7501 County Road 18 Braemar Clubhouse 6364 Dewey Hill Rd. 50Z NS, 50% Smoking.(Manager's % Decision) . . . . . . .Grill Room No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pro -shop No Smoking . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . Ladies' Lounge No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mens' Lounge No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Braemar Room - Public Meetings Leasee's Option . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Braemar Room - Private Parties Smoking Allowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Mixed Lounge Smoking Allowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . East Corridor Smoking Allowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Patios No Smoking. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . Golf Maintenance Bldg. No Smoking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A -Frame Baseball Complex Bldg No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Control Booth Smoking Allowed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All Other Areas No Smoking. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gun Range Edina Golf Dome No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Dome Area Smoking in Designated Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Office /Entry Area No Smoking Edinborough Park No Smoking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Edina Municipal Pool No Smoking Senior Center (except in large room center west side) 7301 County Road 18 7600 Braemar Blvd. 7420 Braemar Blvd. 7700 York Avenue S. 4300 West 66 Street 7151 York Avenue S. 5230 Minnehaha Blvd 7142 Cornelia Drive 6240 Tracy Avenue Gleason Rd & 64th St 5200 Doncaster Way 6501.Warren Avenue 5900 Park Place 6200 Beard Avenue 5801 Londonderry Rd Dewey Hill &Cahill 4115 Grimes Ave. S. Warming Houses No Smoking Arden Park No Smoking Cornelia School No Smoking Countryside Park No Smoking Creek Valley Park No Smoking Highland Park No Smoking Normandale Park No Smoking Pamela Park No Smoking Strachauer Park No Smoking Walnut Ridge Park No Smoking Lewis Park No Smoking Weber Park 7301 County Road 18 7600 Braemar Blvd. 7420 Braemar Blvd. 7700 York Avenue S. 4300 West 66 Street 7151 York Avenue S. 5230 Minnehaha Blvd 7142 Cornelia Drive 6240 Tracy Avenue Gleason Rd & 64th St 5200 Doncaster Way 6501.Warren Avenue 5900 Park Place 6200 Beard Avenue 5801 Londonderry Rd Dewey Hill &Cahill 4115 Grimes Ave. S. CITY OF 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 MAMMA GOLF COURSE SMOKING REGULATIONS AND RECOITAENDATIONS 1. Clearly define the non- smoking and smoking areas persuant to Minnesota statues. z. Establish the above areas relative to size of the room and numbers of smokers. 3. Declare pro -shop, ladies lounge and men's lounge non- - smoking. 4. Permit smoking in the mixed lounge. S. During public meetings, declare the Braemar Room as anon- smoking area in its entirety. Smoking permitted in the east corridor and on the patios. This provides for inclem- ent or cold weather. 6. During private parties, smoking is permitted in the Braemar Room in its entirety or to be determined by the leasee. (Perhaps designated areas would be desirable.) NOTE: Air exchange within the building does meet state spec- ifications of six air changes per hour. VIII.D. MEMORANDUM TO: KENNETH ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER FROM: MARCELLA DAEHN, CITY CLERK SUBJECT: ON SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS DATE: JUNE 11, 1987 Applications for renewal of On Sale Wine.Licenses have been received from the following restaurants for the period of July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988: Daytons Boundary Waters Restaurant Empress Restaurant Original Pancake House Szechuan Star Restaurant Donaldson's Minnesota Room Pantry Restaurant Ediner St. Louie - Bar -B -Que Good Earth Restaurant The Police and Health Departments are now - processing the applications and upon their approval the licenses will be submitted to the State Liquor Control Division for validation. I would recommend that the Council approve these renewals, subject to final approval by the City departments and the State Liquor Control Division. R, VIII.E. M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 10, 1987 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fire Department Reorganization Plan - -- Summary for City Council One of your major- assignments for the new Fire Chief was to examine the Fire Department's organizational structure and prepare a recommendation. This memo summarizes that recommendation. The purpose of this proposal is to suggest an alternative organizational plan that will enable the Department to more effectively manage its resources and maintain the quality of its services. This proposal is based on my assessment of the Department's strengths, needs and realities, with special attention toward anticipated developments in services over the next five years. ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPACT The plan assumes a department staff as currently authorized of 29 paid, 20 paid -on -call (volunteer) officers, specialists and firefighters. Also a clerical staff of one full and one part -time persons. The plan acknowledges the skills and abilities existing within the department ranks and anticipates the utilization of these individuals to fill new and modified positions. This would be accomplished by promotion or reassignment. The primary impact of this proposal is to separate and redefine the role of the Assistant Fire Chiefs, provide a shift lead worker supervisor position of Captain, and eliminate the position of Public Safety Director. OBJECTIVES The following are the primary objectives achievable with this proposed plan. (See Attachment) 1. Develop a structure that will place persons with authority and responsibility for programs in position to make timely decisions with continuity and follow- through. 2. Realistically anticipate developments and changes over the next five years and provide an organizational structure that can adjust and respond to such changes. 3. Maintain a management presence on workshifts by providing first -line supervisors with full authority of "supervisors" under current State Statute. 4. Separate the role of shift Assistant Chief into first -line supervisor and mid - manager components. 5. Develop a company (shift) officer position that can focus on first -line supervisory activities and perform as a lead worker. 6. Expand the role and duties of the fire prevention Assistant Chief to include a larger share of program responsibilities. 7. Develop a clear company officer position that can give focus and discipline to fire ground company operations. 8. Establish an Assistant Chiefs position, that of "Operations ", with prime responsibilities of developing and maintaining consistency, continuity, communication and follow -thru across the three shift work groups. 9. Re- define the role of the Assistant Fire Chief(s) to that of a mid -level manager with broad responsibilities and authority for all major programs and services, with special attention to planning, scheduling, budgeting and assignment functions. COST ANALYSIS The following summary shows position and salary costs based on estimates for 1988 at one full year of operation: POSITION CURRENT PLAN PROPOSED PLAN NOTES Public Safety Dir. $57,657 - -0 -- Eliminated Assistant Chief $45,740 $47,843 Assistant Chief $45,740 $47,843 Assistant Chief $45,740 - -0 -- Reassigned Acting Ass't. Chief $39,793 - -0 -- Eliminated Captain - -0 -- $44,408 New Captain - -0 -- $37,600 New Captain - -0 -- $37,600 New Callback (Captain) - -0 -- $2,880 General Alarm F.M.O. (or) Inspec. $35,718 - -0 -- Promote to Capt. Firefighter /Medic - -0 -- $21,115 New Position TOTAL: $270,388 $239,289 ` Costs are based on the assumptions identified and could be adjusted up or down depending on Firefighter-- FMO - -or Paramedic promoted to Captain; also numbers of candidates to be considered. TRP /ras Attachment (1) ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Edina Fire Department Current Plan: _(1975) City Manager Public Safety Director Fire Chief Secretary A- SHIFT/ B- SHIFT/ C- SHIFT / ASSISTANT'CHIEF Acting Ass'.t.. Ass't.: Chief.' Asst. Chief Chief F olunteers Fire Prev. Proposed Plan ('1987) City Manager Fire Chief Assistant Chief I ,A- SHIFT/ B- SHIFT/ C- SHIFT/ Fire aptain Captain Captain. Prevention Secretary Assistant Chief E.M.S. I I Volunteers I VIII.F. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: 1988 WORK PROGRAM DATE: June 12, 1987 Attached for your consideration is the 1988 Strategic Planning Work Program. This work program stems from the March 21, 1987, goal setting retreat. As last year, we have attempted to "focus" the issues which were identified, list some short -term objectives, outline a strategy to accomplish the objectives and propose a schedule for the completion of the work program. Although the proposed work plans are for the coming year, the strategic goals which have been identified are multi -year. In most cases, the work programs for 1988 are "fact finding" in nature with implementation activities to follow. During the preparation of this work program, we concluded that the 1988 work program is, in reality, the July 1987 to July 1988 work program. This schedule seems to fit well with our budget process and with our strategic planning retreat. As you know, the Council identified an issue concerning redevelopment planning in southeast Edina. In attempting to prepare a work program for this issue, we came to the conclusion that the work program was already in progress in the form of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Hedberg property. Due to the scale of this project, the E.I.S. is considering traffic issues and transportation system needs for the entire southeast sector. We believe that the E.I.S. will provide the necessary work envisioned by the Council for the coming year. We have, therefore, suggested no additional tasks for this issue. On June 1, 1987, the Council decided to review our Comprehensive Plan as it relates to multiple family housing. In our opinion, this issue should be added as a fifth point to the work program. With Mrs. Turner's assistance, we have prepared an issue statement and work program which is included as Issue #5 in the attached materials. KR /sw Attachment lii I I 1988 WORK PROGRAM ISSUE #1. How can the City motivate its employees through monetary and non - monetary incentives within the constraints imposed by public employment? Goal: A productive, flexible and innovative staff which retains a commitment to the City's mission. Focus: Public employment has historically been criticized for its. apparent inability to reward superior performance or correct substandard performance. This problem particularly manifests itself in the long -term employee who finds little incentive to continue a high level of performance. In this regard, the Management Audit Committee commented on the rigidity of the City's compensation program, particularly the fact that "there is little room for merit "adjustments" after four years of employment. The Committee also commented on the use of the employee evaluation process as a goal- setting tool. Two personnel related issues are under consideration during 1987: updated personnel rules and comparable worth. The comparable worth issue in particular will likely provide the basis for long- term changes in the City's compensation program. In addition to personnel rules and comparable worth, four general areas comprise an approach to the issue of employee motivation: A flexible compensation program which rewards superior performance on a long- term.basis - A competitive benefits program - An employee review process which provides a meaningful and regular evaluation of all employees - An employee assistance program which provides for the personal well -being of employees For 1988, we suggest the following: Short -Term Objectives - Conduct a review of our benefits package to determine if it is competitive with that offered by other cities and with the private sector. - Review our employee evaluation process and implement changes, if warranted, to the employee review format and review schedule. Work Program A. Benefits Review The City retained a consultant in 1982 and again in 1985 to undertake a benefits survey. It would be appropriate to utilize the same process in 1988. Anticipated Cost: $10,000 - 15,000 B. Employee Evaluation Process Establish a staff task force comprised of the management of Police, Fire, Public Works and one administrative department to undertake the following assignment: , , 1 0 -2- Assignment * Survey the employee evaluation process of other comparable cities. * Review the present evaluation form and recommend changes. Especially review the advisability of "customizing" evaluation forms for depart- ments /functional areas. * Review the frequency of employee evaluations. * Offer recommendations as to the advisability of evaluating employees who are represented by bargaining units. Timetable Benefits Review 1/02/88 3/15/88 4/15/88 Employee Evaluation Process 10/1/87 2/1/88 Task Retain Consultant Consultant's report Report to Council Appoint task force Task force report to City Manager Responsibility City Manager Consultant City Manager City Manager Task force ISSUE X62. Do the City's Park and Recreation facilities meet the needs of our residents; are parks maintained to an acceptable level; and are park programs properly financed through a system of fees and charges? Goal: Park and Recreation facilities and programs which respond to the changing needs and desires of the community. Focus: The Council has discussed City services and service levels on numerous occasions. Although the 1986 public opinion survey provided a sense of satisfaction with present services, the process of quantifying service levels and matching these services with the desires of the community has always been a difficult undertaking. This year's service level analysis will consider the City's Park and Recreation services. The basic issue which has been identified focuses on the need for matching facilities with the recreation needs of the population - -a population which is demographically different than that which existed when most facilities were constructed. Two associated issues deal with the maintenance of our facilities and the means used to finance our recreation programs. These two issues are somewhat interrelated in that maintenance standards are largely de- pendent upon the availability of financial resources which can be augmented, at least partially, by participant fees. The broader use of such fees, however, may depart from the traditional method of funding City park facilities. Short -Term Objective Undertake a study by a Park and Recreation task force to assess our facilities, our park maintenance objectives and our fees and charges structure, including the overall cost implications of the program, for the purpose of providing findings and recommen- dations for Park Board and City Council consideration. -3- Work Program Establish a task force comprising three Park Board members and four citizens at large. Staff services will be.provided by the Park and Recreation Department. Task Force Assignment * Provide an inventory of existing Park and Recreation facilities. * Conduct a public opinion survey at the task force's option concerning. Park and Recreation programs, maintenance and fees and charges. Estimated cost: $10,000 * Compare Edina's maintenance staffing budget with other cities or with accepted standards. * Conduct an independent audit concerning the present condition of parks and facilities. * Compare Edina's user fee structure with other cities. * Offer findings and recommendations. Timetable 9/14/87 Appoint task force Council 10/19/87 Organizations meeting Park Board /Council /task force 3/14/87 Review final report Council /task force /Park Board ISSUE #3. How can the City develop a long- range, stable revenue source to fund the Capital Improvement Plan? Goal: A capital improvement budget which is adequately funded to provide for the timely replacement and repair of facilities and infrastructure. Focus: The Council identified several issues associated with the City's infrastructure and facilities. These issues revolved around the aging of our facilities and our ability to provide for their maintenance and replacement on a long -term basis. The City's capital improvement budget is funded through a variety of sources, the most significant of which are: - State Aid (gas tax funds) - Special Assessments Earnings on Working Capital Fund - Contributions from Operating Budget Earnings from Enterprises The latter three sources are particularly important to long- term improvements and replacements of park facilities and Police and Fire equipment. Short -Term Obiectives Maximize return on the working capital fund within the investment parameters provided by law. Maintain current contribution to capital improvement plan from operating budget. Identify additional sources to fund the capital improvement budget. , -4- Identify the cost implications for utilizing the services of the portfolio manager. Work Program Utilize the services of a municipal oriented portfolio manager for a portion of the City's investments in order to compare investment results with in -house investment practices. Establish a task force comprised of the City Engineer, Finance Director and Park and Recreation Director to review and report on the advisability of exacting additional fees and charges to fund improvements and replacements to capital facilities. Assignment • Provide a listing of all possible funding sources for the capital plan. • Estimate the potential revenues that could be realized from implementing each possible funding source. * Recommend which funding sources if any should be implemented. Timetable Task Responsibility 2/1/88 Appoint task force Manager 4/1/88 Final Report Task force 5/2/88 Present recommendations to Council Manager ISSUE A. How can the City prepare itself for potential redevelopment in southeast Edina and how can we specifically capitalize on the development of the Hedberg property? Goal: A diversity of land uses in a unique and well - planned setting which minimizes impacts on the surrounding transportation system. Focus: Southeast Edina contains one of the last substantial tracts of vacant land in the City as well as one of the oldest suburban, regional retail centers in the United States. It is located in that sector of the metropolitan area experiencing the greatest pressure for growth from both a residential and commercial standpoint. It is also significantly affected by inadequacies in the region's principal arterial system. The major vacant tract in southeast Edina (Hedberg property) has been sold and plans for its development will likely be submitted in 1987. We should also anticipate redevelopment proposals from existing developments as southeast Edina matures. Many such redevelopments will likely propose an increased density and a diversification of land uses. Short -Term Objective Evaluate potential impacts of development and redevelopment on southeast Edina infrastructure. Work Program Complete the Hedberg Environmental Impact Statement by January 1, 1988. ISSUE #5. Do the land use element and housing element of the Comprehensive Plan properly designate and distinguish areas for low density attached, medium and high density housing and does the City's _Zoning Ordinance properly implement residential land use desig- nations of the Comprehensive Plan? -S- Goal: (as stated in Comprehensive Plan) The goal of the land use element is to provide for the orderly and logical development and redevelopment of lands and waters, maintain an attractive living and working environment and preserve the high quality resi- dential character.of Edina while responding to the changing needs of the population. Short - Term Objectives * Review the Land Use element of the Comprehensive Plan to consider amendments to: a) the definitions of low density attached, medium and high density residential, and b) the land use graphic as to those areas presently designated low density attached, medium and high density residential c) redevelopment policies which encourage the redevelopment of non- , residential land uses with residential uses * Review the Zoning Ordinance sections dealing with multiple residential zoning districts to ensure conformity with the Comprehensive Plan. * Review the housing element of the Comprehensive Plan to consider amendments to policies concerning housing alternatives. Work Program and Timetable 7/13/87 Council special meeting to review Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance 7/29/87 Planning Commission hearing on Comprehensive Plan amendments and Zoning Ordinance amendments 8/17/87 City Council hearing on Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance Staff Responsibilities * Provide Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance materials to Council prior to 7/13/87. * Prepare maps for Council review showing: - Vacant land - Multiple residential areas according to Comprehensive Plan - Potential multiple residential redevelopment sites * Provide a comparison of land use statistics with neighboring cities L I/ f VIII. G. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: David A. Velde, City SanitariaA�/ SUBJECT: Swensens Restaurant Update DATE: June 11, 1 -987 On June 10, 1987, Swensens Restaurant voluntarily closed their food establishment. The restaurant will remain closed until a new food establishment license is issued to the next owner. A total of nine inspections were conducted at Swensens Restaurant over the last four weeks. Swensens passed all inspections. The remainder of the cash deposit for the inspections will be returned to the E1 Gamal's as soon as possible. VIII.H. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney .& Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland, City Manager (� if SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF 1987 LEGISLATIVE ACTS DATE: June 10, 1987 Attached please find an AMM Bulletin which contains the Summary of 1987 Legislative Acts. If you have an opportunity, please glance at this. KR /sw Attachment � I t( association of metropolitan Municopalities June 5, 1.987 TO: AMM Member Cities FROM: Roger Peterson, Director of Legislative Affairs Vern Peterson, Executive Director RE: SUMMARY OF 1987 LEGISLTAIVE ACTS - - ACTS OF PARTICULAR INTEREST TO METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 THE LEGISLATIVE ACT SUMMARIES CONTAINED HEREIN ARE: 1. Uniform Rate, Structure - MWCC (Chapter 53)• 2. Regulating Building Constructiion to attenuate aircraft noise (Chapter 155). 3. Metropolitan Governance Accountability (Chapter 278). 4. Amendments to the Solid Waste Management Act (Chapter 348)• 5. Metropolitan Area Ground Water Protection (Chapter 207). 6. Transit Funding (Chapter 358). 7. Highway Funding (Chapter 358). 8. Omnibus Tax Bill (Chapter 268). 9. Other Miscellaneous Items of Interest: Reprinted from LMC Bulletin.Number 20. 10. Items of Legislative Interest that did not pass. Please contact either Roger Peterson or Vern Peterson (227 -5600) should you have questions. DISTRIBUTION NOTE: THIS BULLETIN IS BEING MAILED TO MAYORS, MANAGERS /ADMINISTRATORS, AND DESIGNATED DELEGATES. -1- 183 university avenue east, st. paul, minnesota 55101 (612) 227 -5600 1. UNIFORM RATE STRUCTURE - MWCC (HF 499, Laws 1987, Chap. 53) This act modifies the cost allocations system of the MWCC by changing the treatment of current value credits and by requiring a uniform treatment rate throughout the metropolitan area for current costs. Specifically, the act removes the requirement that current value credits (current value credits recognize the equity investment that cities had in waste water treatment facilities at -the time such facilites were taken over by the MWCC) be treated as a current cost paid only by current users. It also requires that the current costs of inteceptors, as well-as treatment works, be allocated, uniformerly among cities on the basis of flow and eliminates the six sewer service areas. .The act allows the MWCC to phase in the new costs allocation method over a four year transition period (1988 -1991) and allows the MWCC to establish a reserve or contingency fund not to exceed 7.5% of the commission's total operating budget. - -. 2. REGULATING BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO ATTENUATE AIRCRAFT NOISE (HF 755, Laws 1987, Chap. 155) 6 This act authorizes municipalities in the 7- County Metropolitan Area which, in part or in whole, are within the aircraft noise zones designated in the Metropolitan Council's Aviation Policy Plan to adopt and enforce ordinances and controls to regulate building construction methods and materials for the purpose of attenuating aircraft noise in buildings in and around the noise zone. The ordinance or control shall not apply to existing residential buildings. An ordinance adopted must be adequate to implement the Met Council's guidelines for land use compatability with aircraft noise. Effectivity Date: The day following final enactment. 3. METROPOLITAN GOVERNANCE ACCOUNTABILITY (HF 1043, Laws 1987, Chap. 278) This act makes some minor adjustments to the "accountability aspects" of the Metropolitan Governance System. The main "adjustments" are: -The Council must inform each legislator of the name, address,and background of each candidate for appointment to a regional agency. -The Council must consider evidence of the Candidates' commitment to regularly communicate on issues before the agency with local officials and other interested parties. -Adds the chair of the MTC to the Metropolitan Financial Reporting and Management Advisory Committee (MFAC). - Requires the Council and each Metropolitan Agency to prepare a summary budget for fiscal year 1988 and each year therafter. The purpose of the summary budget is to increase public knowledge -2- and agency accountability by providing citizens outside the agency with a condensed, accessable, and graphic description of the financial affairs of the agency. - Requires the Council to report to the Legislature by January 15, 1988 a recommended process for coordinating the planning and development of transit by regional railroad authorities. - Directs the Council to publish a consolidated metropolitan bulletin or register containing official notices, meeting and hearing schedules for the Council and all Metropolitan Agencies. - Terminates the opt -out "grandfather" for cities eligible for .op -out unless they have already opted -out or taken financial action to opt -out by July 1, 1988. However, a city or town has an additional 12 months extension if it has notified the RTB before July 1, 1988 that the city or town is in the process of completing a transportation evaluation study that includes an assesment of the local transit needs of the city or town. - Requires the Governor to consult with affected Legislators prior to making appointments to the Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC). Effectivity Date: The day following final enactment. 4. AMENDMENTS TO THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT (HF 794, Laws 1987 Chap. 348) The 1987 amendments to the solid waste management act have several provisions which affect Metropolitan Area Cities. One is a provision that protects cities from federal and state antitrust actions by giving explicit state authority for cities to organize solid waste collection as a municipal service or with one or more haulers by ordinance, franchise, license, or contract. Cities are also enabled to implement flow control procedures and regulations to ensure delivery to designated facilities. Before adoption of any mechanism for organizing solid waste collection, cities must give 90 days pre- notice, hold a public hearing, and follow the specific procedures. Also, cities which "host" solid waste landfills, can increase the fee from 15 to 25 cents per cubic yard of waste or its equivalent. Clarifying language was added to make it clear that the proceeds from the disposal fee can be used for abatement purposes in addition to compensation and mitigation for the costs and adverse effects of landfills. The amendments also prohibit the disposal of lead acid batteries or used oil in solid waste facilities after January 19 1988 unless PCA authorizes the disposal. The bill also alters the grant process for local recycling programs. By January 1, 1988, the Met Council must develop performance indicators for local recycling that will measure the -3- Ile- availability and use of recycling throughout the Metropolitan area. The household rebate and tonage reimbursement programs formerly administered by the Council have been repealed. Instead, the Council will provide grants to counties and the counties wll be responsible for funding local recycling programs. The grants to counties are for new activities or to enhance or increase the effectiveness of existing activities. Another condition is that counties must provide support to maintain effective municipal recycling where it is already in place. (The sum of these two "conditions" should ensure the subsidy for existing city recycling programs). Effectivity Date: August 1, 1987 5. METROPOLITAN AREA GROUND WATER PROTECTION (SF 353, Laws 1987, Chap. 207) This act authorizes metropolitan counties to adopt ground water plans. To assure coordination of efforts of all units of government during the preparation and implementation of ground water plans, the county must conduct meetings with local units of government and must also appoint an advisory committee of 15 members. At least seven members of the committee must represent watershed management organization and cities and towns. The act also specifies the elements that must be contained in a county groundwater plan. The plan must be reviewed by the Metropolitan Council and is approved by the Water Resources Board. This act also requires that watershed management organization (WMO) plans must be updated prior to the expiration of the period covered by the plan. The plan must be reviewed for consistency with an adopted county ground water plan and revised as necessary, whenever the watershed plan undergoes substantial revision or updating. The time period as specified in the act for compliance with a county ground water plan is quite confusing but it appears the earliest date required would not be.before 1992. 6. TRANSIT FUNDING (SF 1516, Laws 19879 Chap. 358). The Semi States appropriation bill included $40.9 million of the $46.5 million requested funding for Metropolitan Transit. This amount is slightly less than current funding and provides about same level funding for basic services. Metro mobility was increased about $1.5 million to comply with the 1983 Human Rights Act requiring service area.concidential to the normal service area. Although $400,000 was provided for Light Rail Transit planning and $900,000 for new suburban marketing service, much administrative and planning funding was cut to stay level. The split on fund source was $29.3 million General Fund and $11.6 million from Transit Assistance. Drivers related testing and license fees were-increased by 50% and 5% MVET was transferred -4- to provide the later amount. 7. HIGHWAY FUNDING (SF 1516, Laws 1987 Chap. 358) The legislature followed the lead of the Governor and ducked the Highway funding issue. Only 5% of the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax or about $16.5 million was transferred into the highway users fund in addition to the normal gas tax transfer. Thus, in essence, no new funding was provided. Several bills were submitted and various options including per gallon gas tax increase, 6$ sales tax on gas, and automobile registration fee increases discussed, but in the end the legislature opted for no tax increase. Significant discussion on this issue is expected during the 1988 session. 8. OMNIBUS TAX BILL (HF 529, Laws 1987, Chap. 268) The final provisions of the Omnibus Tax bill for 1987 for cities in general are not too bad considering what could have been based on the starting position of the Governor and picked up on strongly by the Senate. The early on underlying theme of the Administrative and Legislative thinking.was to overcome an $800 million dollar deficit while funding most of the favored programs without being blamed for a huge state tax increase. To do this the structure in a sort of slight of hand proposal was modified to look good on the surface but actually unfund local government so that significant property tax increases would pick up the slack, i.e., a six percent sales tax on all local government-purchases does not look like a tax increase to people but ignores the simple fact that property tax is the ultimate source of funds and this tax is paid by people. After much discussion and public testimony it became clear that the slight of hand was not going to work. However, the final product reflects strongly the postion of the legislature that property taxes were not going to be allowed to rise to fill the void left by increased costs to local government and decreased state assistance. A-. LEVY LIMITS In payable 1988, all cities, including cities under 5000 population heretofore exempt from 275.50 levy limits, will be subject to a tightened 3 percent limit. The levy limit will be equal to the cities (counties) actual 1987 levy minus debt service and unfunded accrued pension liability plus 1987 LGA and other state credits increased by the percentage of growth in population or households for the most recent 12 month period multiplied._by 103 percent and then reduced by the 1988 LGA and other state credits. Debt service and pension liabilities plus some county social programs remain a special levy to be calculated at the actual needed level. For 1989 and beyond the levy limit law reverts to current law except that the new ceiling will be 3 percent instead of 5 percent. The major loss for payable 1988 is Federal Revenue Sharing base increase make up. This will be picked up in 1989. -5- I— B. LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID The LGA to.cities for 1987 will be paid almost as certified and the amounts frozen at that level for 1988. The Governor's and Senate's cuts of 5 and 10 million respectively were axed. However, the 1987 and 1988 allocations will each be reduced by about $218,000 to fund the State auditors government infomation functions and about $206,000 for the Administration.Departments government records program. This amounts to about a .0013 percent per city per year reduction from the certified level. At this time LGA for 1989 is a little murky, since the homestead credit program is totally changed to look more like LGA and the property classes are reduced to nine with ratios changing drastically. There is some new money inserted to provide aid where class changes cause some shifts. C. SALES TAX The full blown 6% sales tax on all Government purchases was not passed. However, as former Sen. Davies once put it, "the nose of the camel has entered the tent door flap ". All Local Governments will have to pay a Motor Vehicle Excise Tax (MVET) of 6% on all vehicles purchased after May 31, 1987. (unless a written contract existed prior to June 1, 1987 calling for delivery and payment after that date but prior to December 319 1987.) Based on definition the MVET seems to apply to everything that has a motor and wheels except possibly golf carts and riding lawn mowers. The sales tax was extended to a variety of services, including: parking services, admissions to recreational areas, dry cleaning and laundry services, lawn and garden services, meals in hospital and nursing home cafeterias (for non - residents), building cleaning and maintenance, security services, and others. Cities may have to collect the sales tax for certain services they provide, particularly parking services (whether contractural, hourly, or on,a periodic basis) and admissions to recreational areas. D. TAX STUDY COMMISSION The Legislative Tax Study Commission eliminated some years ago was reinstated to do the following: - examine the burden of income maintenance and social services on the property tax levies, - examine and recommend alternative methods of income adjusted property tax relief for homeowners and renters, - examine and recommend alternative property tax classification systems and the effects of the simplified system; - examine the tax structure and revenue needs and resources of the state an local government, -make long range tax policy recommendations, - analyze proposed legislation, - examine the property tax burdens on agricultural, commercial - industrial and employment property; and -file a report with the legislature at least biennially. E. SMALL BUSINESS TRANSITION CREDIT For 1988 only, commercial - industrial property will be eligible to receive a state paid property tax credit if the 1988 property taxes on the first $120,000 of market value of the property exceed three percent. The credit will be equal to 50 percent of the tax attributable to the first $120,000 of market value that is in excess of three percent. Only one commercial - industrial parcel per owner per county will qualify for this credit. The credit will be the first credit deducted from gross tax, before the deduction of any other property tax credit. This small business credit will provide small businesses with an.estimated $25.5 million of property tax relief in 1988. F. HOMESTEAD CLASSIFICATION CHANGE FOR 1988 For payable 1988, residential homestead classification ratios are changed to 17 percent of the first $68,000 of market value and 27 percent of the excess over $68,000. In payable 1987, these ratios were 18 percent of the first $66,000 of market value and 28 percent of the market value in excess of $66,000. For 1988, the homestead credit will remain at 54 percent up to a maximum credit of $700. The classificaiton ratios are also changed accordingly on non - agricultural homestead property owned by the blind, disabled, and paraplegic veterans and-manufactured homes which are homsteaded. No change is made in the 1988 ratios for agricultural homesteads. G. LOCAL GAMBLING TAX A city or county may impose a local gambling tax on each licensed organization if the tax proceeds are ncessary to cover the costs of regulation of gambling. The tax may not exceed three percent of an organization's gross receipts minus prize costs. This tax is in lieu of all other local taxes and local investigation fees on lawful gambling. Tax revenue collections and the uses of the proceeds are required in an annual report (by March 15 of each year). H. DEED TAX The exemption from the deed tax for state agencies and politcal subdivisions is repealed. The tax rate is also increased to $1.65 for each $500 of value. Unlike current law, cities will be required to pay this tax whenever lands are granted, assigned, transferred, or otherwise conveyed by deed. This tax is applied to transfers by deed after May 31, 1987. I. PROPERTY TAX REFORM The Senate proposed a significantly modified tax system which the final compromise adopted beginning in 1989. The new system reduced the number of property classes from 68 to theoretically 9. The ratios are increased by about -7- 125% to accommodate the reduction which means mill rates will be reduced to about 45% of current. The Homestead Credit is changed to a percent of property value exemption and local units will be given a "homestead and agricultural credit replacement aid." To adjust for loses or gains due to class changes a special tax base adjustent aid will be provided. In future years the homestead credit replacement aid will be adjusted by inflation and controlled by the legislature to divorce homestead credit fluctuations from local spending decisions. The cost and mechanics of the new system are complex. Adoption was delayed to 1989 primarily to give the legislature a year to refine and tinker with details. Since this program doesn't begin . immediately it gives the various lobby groups time to analyze and propose appropriate refinements. Thus, what may be ultimately implemented may be considerably different than what is currently written. The AMM will look at this carefully through policy committee process for 1988. 9. OTHER LAWS OF NOTE: Reprinted from LMC Bulletin Number 20. A. INDEMNIFICATION FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES (SF 53, Laws 19879 Chap. 79) Allows any municipality to procure insurance for punitive damages and requires a municipality to defend and indemnify any of its officers and employees for damages, including punitive damages if the officer or employee was: 1) acting in the performance of the duties of the position; and 2) not guilty of malfeasance in office, willful neglect of duty, or bad faith Different effective dates. B. WAIVER OF GOVERNMENTAL LIMITS (HF 1083, Laws 19879 Chap. 260) A municipalities procurement of insurance.waives only governmental liability limits to the extent of the liability stated in the policy. A municipality cannot waive any defenses or immunities through the procurement of liability insurance. Effective 8/1/87. C. PROSECUTION OF CERTAIN GROSS MISDEMEANORS (HF 384, Laws 1987, Chap. 329) Requires cities of the first, second, and third class to prosecute gross misdemeanor violations of damage to property, theft, and financial card fraud. Effective 8/1/87. - D. MINIMUM WAGE (HF 3, Laws 1987, Chap. 324) Raises the state minimum, wage for employees 18 years of age or older of 1) federally covered employers to $3.55 an hour beginning January 1, 1988; $3.85 an hour beginning January 1, 1989; and $3.95 an hour beginning January 1, 1990, and 2) state - covered employers ME to $3.50 an hour beginning January 1, 1988; $3.65 an hour beginning January 1, 1989; and $3.80 an hour beginning January 1, 1990. The state minimum wage for employees under 18 years of age of 1) federally covered employers to $3.20 an hour beginning January 1, 1988; $3.47 an hour beginning January 1, 1989; and $3.56 and hour beginning January 1, 1990, and 2) state covered employers $3.15 an hour beginning January 19 1988; $3.29 an hour beginning January 1, 1989; and $3.42 an hour beginning January 1, 1990- Effective 1/1/88. E. PARENTAL LEAVE (HF 234, Laws 1987, Chap. 359) Establishes mandatory unpaid leave of absences up to six weeks, for an employee who has been employed by an employer (employer means a person or entity that employs 21 or more employees at a single site) for at least 12 months and who is the natural or adoptive parent of a newly born or adopted child. The employer can adopt reasonable rules governing the timing of requests for unpaid leave. The employer must make insurance coverage available to the employee while on leave of absence, however, the employer does not need to pay the costs of such coverage. The employee would be entitled to return to work in the employe'e's former position or in a position of comparable duties, number of hours, and. pay. F. OPEN MEETING -- NOTICE REQUIRED (SF 1272, Laws 1987, Chap. 313) Requires a public body to keep a schedule of its regular meetings on file at its primary offices and if there are any changes it must give notice as required for a special meeting. For a special meeting a public body must post written notice of the date, time, place, and purpose.of the meeting on the principal bulletin board of the public body's offices or on the door of its usual meeting room three days before the special meeting. The public body must mail notice to each person who has filed a written request for notice of special meetings or publish the notice once, at least three days before the meeting. A public body may establish an expiration date for requests for notices of special meetings.. If the body establishes an expiration date, it must notify each person who filed a request for notice 60 days before the date of expiration. An emergency meeting is a special meeting called because of circumstances that, in the judgment of the public body, require immediate consideration by the public body. A public body must make a good faith effort to provide notice of emergency meetings to each news medium that has filed a written request for notice if the request includes the news medium's telephone number. If the body discusses or acts on matters not directly related to the emergency at'an emergency meeting, the minutes of the meeting shall include a specific description of the matters. A recessed or continued meeting does not require additional notice unless the time and place of the continued meeting was not announced during the previous meeting. If a person receives actual notice of a meeting at least 24 hours before the meeting, all notice requirements are satisfied regardless of the method of receipt of such notice. No fine or penalty may be imposed on a member of a public body for violation of these notice provisions unless such violation was willful and deliberate. Effective 8/1/87. G. PIPELINE SAFETY ACT (SF 90, Laws 1987, Chap. 353) Gives the environmental quality board (EQB) the authority to regulate the siting of pipelines unless federal law pre -empts this section. Once the EQB issues a pipeline routing permit, it pre - empts all local regulations. The act establishes an on -call excavation notice system to notify owners or operators of underground facilities of planned excavations. A local governmental unit that issues excavation permits must display an excavator's and operator's notice at the location where it issues the permits and it must give a copy of the notice to each person obtaining a permit for excavation. The law creates a state office of pipeline safety to regulate and enforce pipelines within the state. Every city, town, and county that has planning and zoning authority and has a pipeline within its borders, must adopt a pipeline setback ordinance by August 1, 1989. The pipeline ordinance must meet or exceed the minimum standards of the model ordinance. If the local unit doesn't enact an ordinance the model ordinance will apply. A local unit of government jurisdiction must prepare response plan, and review operation of the pipeline safety. Different effective dates. having a pipeline within its a pipeline release emergency it annually to reflect changes in the or other matters related to pipeline H. PESTICIDE REGULATION (SF 1516, Sections 43 -82, Laws 1987; Chap. 358) Establishes state regulation of pesticides and pre - empts local regulation except for pesticide application warning ordinances. A city would be able to enact an ordinance containing the information in the statutory sample ordinance, plus its own licensing, penalty, and enforcement provisions. A city would not be able enact an ordinance that contains more restrictive pesticide application warning information than is contained in the statute. -10- Effective 8/1/87. 10. ITEMS OF LEGISLATIVE INTEREST THAT DID NOT PASS .A. FISCAL DISPARITIES The Association of Metropolitan . Municipalities Fiscal Disparity bill, authored by Rep. Ann Rest and Sen. Ember Reichgott was referred to the Metropolitan Affairs Committee.in the House and the Tax Committee in the Senate. The bill passed substantially unchanged from subcommittee in the House to full committee where it was held by Chairman Tom Osthoff of St. Paul while he attempted to find a series of amendments beneficial to St. Paul and acceptable to the bill's sponsors. None were found. Meanwhile, since the bill will ultimately be sent to both Tax Committees, the respective Chairs, Rep. Voss and Sen. Johnson, decided to hold..- the issue for interim study and possible 1988 action due to the heavy tax related activity of the 1987 session. The basic premise of the AMM.position is to moderate the effects of contribution on the 15 largest contributors and eliminate the perceived inequities while maintaining the primary purpose of the law in continuing to augment the tax base of those communities which cannot attract a reasonable share of the metropolitan commercial /industrial growth. Although most local officials of gaining cities in states - person like stances compromised less future gains to achieve an overall solid program, legislators from these same areas are going to be much harder to convince. B. WINE IN GROCERY STORES Legislation introduced by Rep. Linda Scheid (HF 1342) and Sen. Darril Wegscheid (SF 1302) would have mandated that municipalities in the Metropolitan Area only, issue off sale wine license when requested by any business holding a 3.2 Beer License (Grocery Stores, Convenience Stores, Gas Stations, etc.). The house bill passed committee early but remained on the floor on General Orders without further hearing. Although the vote 22 for and 7 against was one sided in committee, a floor vote may have been quite different. One Rep. that should have been against voted yes just to get it to the floor because he was tired of taking the heat on this issue from the backers solely at the committee level. The Senate author asked for an interim study with the promise that he (Sen. Wegscheid is the chair of the appropriate subcommittee) would take the show on the road for serious discussion statewide. Most outstate legislators looked at the metro only provision as a foot in the door temporary situation. Since this issue is of great concern, not only to member cities with municipal liquor but others for enforcement reasons, the AMM will keep members informed as to future hearings. -11- C. TRANSIT PROPERTY TAX FEATHERING The AMM sponsored a bill,SF 304, Tad Jude and HF 1608, Becky Kelso to correct the MTC propery tax mill reduction from one half and three quarters of a mill to 25% and 37% of the adjusted two mill levy as per the intent of the 1984 RTB legislation. Senate Transportation passed the bill to the Tax Committee where it remains until 1988. Because of the severe 800 million dollar state budget shortfall and the Governors lack of interest in transit the chance for action this year was extremely low and in fact the extra $2 million dollars was not included. Initial analysis of the property tax reform legislation for 1989 would indicate that the problem is corrected because of the classification rate changes without further legislation. A more thorough study will be made and appropriate action taken to maintain the correction through next years session. D. TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY Rep. Tom Osthoff introduced a major policy shifting bill (HF 1012) dealing with heretofore property tax exempt parcels which in part survived significant committee scrutiny and public testimony to find its way into the final House Tax Bill package. The final proposal would have permitted cities to establish a 'fee for service' for basic services such as public safety and street related items on all tax exempt property. Although this property tax broadening issue did not survive the final Tax Bill, the fact that the House of Representatives did discuss and vote favorably on the issue is significant. If, as anticipated, the legislators become involved in a Property Tax Reform discussion in the interim and during the 1988 session, treatment of Tax Exempt Property could be a major element. E. ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINE BALLOTS (COLOR CODING) This much publicized issue leading to the first filibuster of a bill since 1963 started as a bill- sponsored by two Minneapolis legislators aimed at limiting electronic voting machine use in Minneapolis. The bill, SF 466, Carl Kroening and, HF 756, John Sarna was then amended in committee to require row ballots by party and to apply to all cities. This would have required reprogramming of machines at $1,000 each, about $4 million statewide, and placed in doubt their use in the next election due to the time for shipping and modifying by the machine companies. As a compromise, color shading by party was suggested. This would be significantly cheaper and not require machine modification. From the city viewpoint this would have been an acceptable alternative. However, the Republicans opposed yellow shading for them while Democrats took blue and succesfully filbustered the issue. It will come up again in 1988 but the use of electronic voting machines without reprogrammiing expense is assured for this year and probably the future. -12- T)PC/1T T"TONT BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge for Watermain No. 186 in the amount of $698.24 to be levied against Lot 7, Block 3, Walnut Ridge First Addition (PIN 31- 117 -21 -31 -0022) over a six year period at the rate of 7.5% payable starting in 1988. ADOPTED this 15th day of June, 1987. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached.and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 15, 1987, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of July, 1987. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk �I N In 1 EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH of america STEWARDSHIP DEPARTMENT Darrel D. Stark Director Thomas C. Cairns Consultant IX.A. June 11, 1987 City Clerk and City Council of Edina We would like to connect our home to water main #186. We would like to convert the connection charge to a levied assessment to be assessed over a period of six (6) years. Thank you. 6VA�'���t�R� i C7 rk 5924 Walnut Drive 7 Edina, MN 55436 Phone: (612) 938 -9413 31- t(7- 2i -51- 0022 1o+ 7, aio,� i,, wj-wAa4 fj�,+ l s 1987 CITY-6f EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE ' 116493 06/08/87 7,614.90 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 7,614.90 * * ** -CKS 166003 06/02/87 443.18 ALBINSON BLUE PRINTNG 10 -4570- 260-26 ' 166003 06/02/87 52.50 ALBINSON REPAIR PARATS 40- 4540- 803 -80 393021 495.68 * ' 166004 06/02/87 150.23 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 440 -44 166004 06/02/87 7.16 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 482 -48 166004 06/02/87 102.49 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 166004 06/02/87 22.89 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 520 -52 166004 06/10/87 11.40 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 628 -62 166004 06/02/87 46.84 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 841 -84 166004 06/02/87 46.84- AMERICAN LINEN CORRECTION 10- 4262 - 841 -84 166004 06/02/87 34.77 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 821 -82 166004 06/02/87 46.84 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50 -4262- 841 -84 166004 06/02/87 44.64 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50- 4262- 861 -86 420.42 * 166005 06/10/87 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 822 -82 166005 06/10/87 37.25 AUDIO GROUP ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 862 -86 74.50 * * * * * ** ** *-CKS 166008 06/02/87 23.65 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 166008 06/10/87 18.31 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 166008 06/04/87 44.86 KAMAN BEARING d SPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 86.82 • * * * * ** * ** -CKS h 166013 06/08/87 101.29 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1323 166013 06/08/87 126.06 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 301 -30 1322 166013 06/08/87 41.64 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 1334 268.99 s * ** -CKS 166015 06/10/87 89.29 AT d T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 166015 06/10/87 52.34 AT 3 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 612 -61 141.63 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 166018 06/10/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 801 -80 166018 06/10/87 6.75 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -82 166018 06/10/87 13.50 AT d T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 861 -86 27.00 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 166025 06/10/87 31.00 ALFONS ANDERSSON SERVICES 27- 4201- 663 -66 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166026 166026 166026 166026 166026 •iriir 166028 166028 166028 166031 166031 166031 166031 166031 166031 166031 166031 166033 166033 166033 166034 166034 rsirii 166037 166038 166039 166041 166041 166041 06/08/87 06/04/87 06/08/87 06/10/87 06/04/87 06/10/87 06/08/87 06/08/87 AMOUNT 31.00 s 2,093.40 2,093.40 970.28 184.80 432.31 5,774.19 s 826.70 1,454.65 2,410.95 4,692.30 i CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BADGER METER INC BADGER METER INC BADGER METER INC BADGER METER INC BADGER METER INC BEER WHOLESALERS BEER WHOLESALERS BEER WHOLESALERS WATER METERS WATER METERS WATER METERS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY 06 -15 -87 PAGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE 40- 1220 - 000 -00 489963 40 -1220- 000 -00 488789 40 -1220- 000 -00 490476 40- 4540 - 807 -80 490949 40- 4540 - 807 -80 488917 27- 4630- 664 -66 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 06/04/87 14.47 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 06/03/87 5.56 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 296762 06/04/87 4.14 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 160 -16 06/04/87 2.75 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 160 -16 296594 06/04/87 17.40 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES •10- 4516 - 507 -50 06/10/87 2.36 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUP 10- 4516 - 600 -60 06/10/87 17.68 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPP 10- 4516 - 600 -60 06/04/87 26.06 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 600 -60 90.42 s 06/03/87 465.06 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 10- 4626- 842 -84 06/03/87 190.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 06/03/87 379.20 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 862 -86 1,034.26 s 06/02/87 34.03 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 34735 06/02/87 52.18 BLOOMINGTON CHRY -PLY REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 34677 86.21 s 06/09/87 111.60 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 275 -04 111.60 s 06/02/87 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 s 06/10/87 2,365.42 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC INFIELD MIX 10- 4561- 642 -64 2,365.42 i 06/08/87 _ _ , ._ 1,879.36 -- - -• - -- -BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 26642 06/08/87 33.56 BURY R CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 26560 06/08/87 284.12 BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 26642 iir -CKS sir -CKS sis -CKS sii —CKS iii —CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE ttsstt AMOUNT 166043 06/02/87 wsswww BATTERY WAREHOUSE 166047 06/09/87 166047 06/10/87 166047 06/10/87 166047 06/04/87 166048 06/08/87 " ttrtrw BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY 166053 06/02/87 166054 06/08/87 166054 06/08/87 166054 06/08/87 166054 06/02/87 rwswww BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC 166058 06/02/87 wwrtws CITY BEER ' 166060 06/04/87 166060 06/10/87 •ttwws ' 166062 06/02/87 166062 06/08/87 - -. •wrwrr ' 166073 06/09/87 166073 06/08/87 166073 06/09/87 rttrtt 166075 06/04/87 1 82.52 CHECK REGISTER 82.52 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 2,197.04 r BATTERY WAREHOUSE 259.50 95.50 B 3 B SEAT COVERS CONT REPAIRS 95.50 t t 100.00 151.20 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO SUPPLIES 3.60 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO SUPPLIES 40.87 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO SUPPLIES 41.55 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY ADVERTISING 237.22 t 54.85 s 47.25 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC GEN SUPPLIES 47.25 t 144.95 CITY BEER 82.52 BROWNING FERRIS 82.52 w 121.32 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 260.48 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 259.50 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 68.40 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 709.70 t 100.00 WAYNE BENNETT 100.00 s 261.90 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE 156.10 - -- AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE 418.00 r 30.50 BROCK WHITE 24.35 BROCK WHITE 54.85 s 155.50 CITY BEER 233.65 CITY BEER 144.95 CITY BEER 534.10 r 65.28 CLANCY DRUG INC RUBBISH RMOVAL REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PARTS POLICE SERVICE CONCESSIONS CONCESSIONS GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES- - INVENTORY INVENTORY INVENTORY GEN SUPPLIES 06 -15 -87 PAGE 3 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. N MESSAGE tsr -CKS 10 -4248- 560 -56 5557 10- 4508 - 420 -42 711098 10- 4508- 440 -44 698511 10- 4508 - 440 -44 698725 23- 4214 - 611 -61 693233 10- 4504- 520 -52 67157 10- 4250 - 628 -62 10- 4540 - 560 -56 97728 10- 4540- S60 -S6 91912 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1343 10 -4620- 560 -56 1514 10- 4100 - 430 -42 27- 4624- 663 -66 27- 4624 - 663 -66 10- 4504- 260 -26 200400 10- 4504- 260 -26 200138 50- 4630- 822 -82 50 -4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 10- 4504 - 133 -12 rwr -CKS ttw -CKS ' ttt -CKS ttt -CKS rtw -CKS • rtt -CKS rrs -CKS • 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 06 -15 -87 PAGE 4 , 166078 06/10/87 _ 166078 06/09/87 MESSAGE 65.28 166080 06/10/87 166080 06/10/87 166080 06/10/87 * ** * *# _ 166082 06/10/87 166082 06/10/87 166082 06/10/87 _ 166082 06/10/87 166082 06/10/87 sss * #* INVENTORY 166086 06/10/87 764.45 166095 06/04/87 166097 06/04/87 166099 06/08/87 ' 1,335.39 166106 06/02/87 166107 06/08/87 126.94 166110 06/08/87 CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 4 , AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. M MESSAGE 65.28 • *+* -CKS , 240.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 524.45 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 764.45 • + ** -CKS 1,335.39 CONT -MINN GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 126.94 CONT -MINN SUPPLIES 27 -4612- 663 -66 2,099.46 CONT -MINN CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 3,561.79 • *** -CKS 25.00 CONWAY FIRE d SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 92948 12.00 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274-420 -42 92949 42.;70 CONWAY FIRE 6 SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 92733 42.00 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY GEN SUPP 10- 4504 - 440 -44 92546 , 135.00 CONWAY FIRE d SAFETY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 92545 256.70 • +** -CKS 16.00 CRONSTROMS SUPPLY CO REFUND 10- 3130 - 000 -00 16.00 * ** -CKS 55.00 COMMISSIONER REVENUE SERVICES 10 -4201- 200 -20 55.00 * ** -CKS 40.32 COURTNEY C WAYNE MILEAGE 10 -4208- 100 -10 40.32 * *** -CKS 58.75 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 26672 58.75 * * ** -CKS 100.00 - DAHL- MR HILDING POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 + 152.12 DALCO CORPORATION GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 643 -64 108337 152.12 * ** -CKS 336.15 DAVIDSEN DIST INC INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 5 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE — 336.15 » ' »sssss » »s —CKS 166114 06/08/87 3.34 DELEGARD TOOL CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322-30 28248 166114 06/08/87 8.50 .DELEGARD TOOL CO TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 28058 - 11.84 » ' s »s » »» s »» —CKS 166120 06/09/87 8,681.59 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL SERVICES 10- 2010 - 000-00 166120 06/09/87 12,656.63 DORSEY & WHITNEY LEGAL SERVICES 10- 2010-000 -00 • 21,338.22 » ' » » »ss» »t» —CKS 166125 06/08/87 206.07 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 643 -64 16805 166125 06/08/87 408.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 645 -64 16806 166125 06/08/87 450.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 645 -64 ' 166125 06/02/87 98.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 10- 4512 - 540 -54 16772 166125 06/08/87 237.04 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540-54 16807 • 166125 06/02/87 469.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 16731 ' 166125 06/02/87 142.10 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540 -54 16759 166125 06/02/87 484.95 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 16740 • 166125 06/08/87 89.40 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 26- 4512 - 682-68 16828 " 166125 06/03/87 53.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 26- 4512 - 682 -68 16785 166125 06/03/87 45.00 MERIT SUPPLY CHEMICALS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 16785 • 166125 06/09/87 402.15 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 28- 4512 - 702 -70 16801 ' 166125 06/02/87 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 16773 166125 06/02/87 414.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 16759 e 166125 06/08/87 98.00 MERIT SUPPLY PAINT 40- 4544 - 801 -80 16804 ' 4,012.31 » 166126 06/10/87 231.00 DAVIS EUGENE WEED INSTP 10- 4201- 600 -60 ' 166126 06/10/87 31.92 DAVIS EUGENE MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 262.92 r " • » »r »sr - s »» —CKS • 166134 06/04/87 36.75 CITY WIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 ' 36.75 » e »ss »ss »»s —CKS ' 166136 06/08/87 159.00 EARL F ANDERSEN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 70430 4 159.00 » s»s —CKS 4 166143 06/10/87 122.83 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 166143 06/10/87 165.60 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 4 288.43 + ' » »s » »s s»s —CKS 166150 06/10/87 22.89 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 137910 f 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 6 CHECK N0. *r * » »* 166158 166158 rr *r *» 166162 166162 166162 166183 166188 166188 166188 rrr » *r 166192 166194 166194 166194 166194 166194 166195 166195 r *rrr* 166199 166199 166199 166206 DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 22.89 • 06/08/87 351.14 FEED RITE CONTR 06/08/87 1,347.12 FEED RITE CONTR 1,698.26 * 06/04/87 108.07 FOWLER ELECTRIC 06/04/87 108.07- FOWLER ELECTRIC 06/04/87 108.07 FOWLER ELECTRIC 108.07 * 06/08/87 22.23 BEST LOCKING SY 22.23 • 06/08/87 15.92 GRAYBAR ELECTRI 06/02/87 260.87 GRAYBAR ELECTRI 06/02/87 196.28 GRAYBAR ELECTRI 473.07 r 06/08/87 172.85 WEST WELD 172.85 06/02/87 19.00 06/10/87 52.33 06/02/87 266.25 06/08/87 159.40 06/09/87 186.00 682.98 r 06/04/87 45.84 06/10/87 93.00 138.84 * 06/08/87 15.30 G T PARTS 06/08/87 149.28 G T PARTS 06/08/87 90.72 G T PARTS 255.30 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. N MESSAGE OL WATER SUPPJLIES 40- 4622 - 805 -80 85897 OL WATER SUPPLIES 40- 4622- 805 -80 86381 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4310 - 665 -66 66015 CORRECTION 27- 4540 - 665 -66 66015 REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 665 -66 66015 STEMS REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 540-54 73268 C CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 346512 C CO CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 349985 C CO CONSTRUCTION 60 -1300- 264 -04 349988 WELDING SUPPLIES 10- 4610- 560 -56 56556 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP RENTAL GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERVICE GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP REPLACE GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR PARTS GOLF CAR MIDWEST REPAIR PARTS 06/04/87 859.15 G d K SERVICES 10 -4226- 301 -30 25759 10- 4248 - 440 -44 77446 10- 4294 - 560 -56 25758 10- 4294 - 560 -56 77010 10- 4901 - 420 -42 76865 27 -4540- 665 -66 10234 27- 4540 - 665 -66 10373 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- S60 -56 16164 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 15873 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 15869 LAUNDRY 10- 4262-301 -30 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * *r -CKS * ** -CKS *r* -CKS * ** -CKS *** -CKS * ** -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE ' 166206 06/04/87 166206 06/04/87 166206 06/04/87 " 166206 06/04/87 228.22 + 166209 06/08/87 ' 166209 06/08/87 166209 06/08/87 166209 r 06/08/87 ''v 166228 06/08/87 119.67 MCGUIRE 166214 06/08/87 166228 06/08/87 166215 06/08/87 # # # # ## SUPPLY AMOUNT 349.31 230.20 113.60 387.00 1,939.26 • 15.29 80.71 181.43 32.98 310.41 • 6.00 6.00 • 45.36 45.36 • CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION G d K SERVICES LAUNDRY G d K SERVICES LAUNDRY G & K SERVICES SUPPLIES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY GENUINE PARTS GENUINE PARTS GENUINE PARTS GENUINE PARTS TOLL COMPANY HIRSHFIELDS r 166220 06/08/87 209.50 MAR NED LUMBER CO 166220 06/08/87 18.72 MAR NED LUMBER CO y 228.22 + + + + + #+ ''v 166228 06/08/87 119.67 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 166228 06/08/87 48.91 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 166228 06/08/87 43.69 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY r 166228 06/08/87 1,039.10 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 166228 06/08/87 126.24 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 166228 06/08/87 230.01 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 166228 06/04/87 54.54 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY 1,662.16 • 166231 06/08/87 353.00 HOFFERS INC y 166231 06/08/87 264.75 HOFFER$ INC _ _ 617.75 + + ## # ## 166245 06/10/87 r 166245 06/04/87 166249 06/02/87 yr 0 31.00 ROBERT B HILL 58.80 ROBERT B HILL 89.80 + 100.00 uM HOFFMAN 100.00 + REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PARTS 06 -15 -87 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4262- 560 -56 10- 4262- 646 -64 10- 4512 - 540 -54 40- 4262- 801 -80 10- 4540 - 560 -56 317983 10- 4540 - 560 -56 315717 10- 4540 - 560 -56 268581 10- 4620- 560 -56 268184 GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 031287 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 2746 REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520-52 2751 GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TOOLS PARTS REPAIR PARTS GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES POLICE SERVICE 10 -4504- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 646-64 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10 -4580- 560 -56 10 -4620- 560 -56 27- 4540 - 664 -66 10- 4504 - 642-64 35600 10- 4504 - 642 -64 35048 10- 4504 - 440 -44 27- 4504 - 662 -66 10 -4100- 430 -42 + +# -CKS + ## -CKS + +• -CKS ••• -CKS #•+ -CKS + #• -CKS • #+ -CKS 1987 Cl.. OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE . 166253 06/08/87 166256 06/02/87 + * * * ** 166278 06/08/87 166278 06/04/87 166278 06/04/87 166279 06/02/87 18223 166289 06/02/87 166294 06/10/87 166294 06/09/87 166294 06/09/87 166294 06/10/87 166295 06/08/87 + * * * ** 23- 4504 - 613 -61 166300 06/08/87 86.45 JERRYS FOODS 166302 06/08/87 166302 06/08/87 166302. 06/08/87 166302 06/08/87 166304 06/02/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/08/87 AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 06-15 -87 PAGE 8 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE *** -CKS 105.00 HUMPHREY RADIATOR CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 105.00 • * ** -CKS 87.50 ICSI REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 18223 87.50 • * ** -CKS 87.12 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 613 -61 86.45 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504- 613 -61 17.99 JERRYS FOODS COST OF COMM 27- 4624- 663 -66 191.56 + 31.50 METRO FONE COMMUNICATIONS GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504 - 801 -80 243751 31.50 + * ** -CKS 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 • *** -CKS 151.62 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 345 -30 16.23 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR 10 -4540- 390 -30 45.27 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 219.09 CRESCENT ELECTRIC CONSTUCTION 60- 1300 - 264 -04 432.21 * 25.00 TRIARCO ARTS 6 CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4588 - 611 -61 232295 25.00 * * ** -CKS 2,328.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 2,328.00 + * ** -CKS 495.30 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 4,195.30 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY 50- 4630- 822 -82 495.30- KUETHER DIST CO CORRECTION 50- 4630- 822 -82 7,363.85 KUETHER DIST CO INVENTORY .50- 4630- 842 -84 11,559.15 • * ** -CKS 6.59 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 504685 46.12 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 504844 77.67 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 504765 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE ' 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/02/87 ' 166304 06/02/87 166304 06/02/87 166304 06/08/87 166304 06/10/87 166304 06/02/87 166304 06/02/87 166304 06/02/87 166311 06/09/87 166311 06/09/87 166311 06/09/87 LUMBER CO 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 ' 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 y 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 166317 06/02/87 REPAIR PARTS KNOX 166318 06/08/87 166318 06/09/87 166318 06/08/87 O SUPPLIES 166319 06/04/87 i PAINT sssssi LUMBER 166323 06/10/87 166323 06/10/87 LUMBER CO ssssss SUPPLIES 166329 06/08/87 CO GEN AMOUNT 14.37 43.38 55.05 37.08 5.58 214.20- 214.20 214.20 137.74 22.45 121.81 10.64 11.85 804.53 s 4,036.50 6,955.30 7,759.59 18,751.39 s 59.27 202.72 212.95 235.93 265.07 198.99 455.14 216.65 329.94 178.24 451.45 296.88 3,103.23 t 77.80 14.85 30.00 122.65 + 252.00 252.00 + 13.00 6.50 19.50 + 950.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO CORRECITON KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO PAINT KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY LEEF BROS INC CONT REPAIRS LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY LEITNER COMPANY SOD BLACK DIRT LINHOFF PHOTO SPLY LINHOFF PHOTO SPLY LAYNE MINNESOTA CO CONT REPAIRS 06 -15 -87 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 514128 10 -4504- 646 -64 514249 10 -4504- 646 -64 514386 10- 4504 - 646 -64 514254 10- 4504 - 646 -64 514284 10- 4540 - 520 -50 514669 10- 4540 - 520 -50 514669 10- 4540- 520 -52 514669 10 -4540- 646 -64 504765 27- 4544 - 662 -66 220126 28 -4504- 702 -70 514140 28- 4504 - 702 -70 514508 28- 4504 - 702 -70 514472 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630 - 862 -86 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10- 4504 - 322 -30 10 -4504- 325 -30 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4504 - 646 -64 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10 -4620- 560 -56 10 -4620- 560 -56 10 -4620- 560 -56 10- 4262 - 440 -44 23 -4248- 612-61 27 -4262- 664 -66 27 -4562- 664 -66 10- 4508 - 440 -44 118731 10- 4508 - 440 -44 118734 40 -4248- 801-80 15388 sss -CKS ess -CKS ess -CKS +ss -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166329 06/08/87 166329 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166336 06/10/87 166359 06/10/87 166341 06/08/87 « « « « *« 06/04/87 166343 06/02/87 166344 06/10/87 166344 06/10/87 166344 06/10/87 166344 06/10/87 166344 06/10/87 166344 06/10/87 « * « « «* 166346 06/08/87 41.85 MED OXYGEN 166352 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/10/87 166359 06/10/87 166359 06/08/87 166359 06/04/87 166359 06/10/87 166359 06/04/87 166359 06/08/87 166360 06/02/87 166360 06/02/87 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 925.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO CONT REPAIRS 15,169.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO REPAIR PARTS 17,044.00 « 06 -15 -87 PAGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 40- 4248 - 801 -80 15389 40- 4540 - 801 -80 15387 61.85 LANCE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 61.85 * 102.55 M 6 I IND SUPPLY SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642- 301 -30 057964 102.55 * 170.33 MINNESOTA GLOVE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 13004 170.33 * 41.85 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 449 -44 14.19 MED OXYGEN 3 EQUIP 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 33.14 MED OXYGEN b EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 26.64 MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 16.64- MED OXYGEN d EQUIP CORRECTION 10- 4510 - 440 -44 16.64 MED OXYGEN R EQUIP 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510- 440 -44 115.82 2,079.00 MET N WASTE C L COMM BLDG PERMIT 10- 3095 - 000 -00 2,079.00 * 80.52 MUNICILITE CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 9147 80.52 * 131.37 MINN TORO INC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 657162 498.00 MINN TORO INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 659544. 79.94 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 659173 14.84 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 659359 8.61 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 659744 81.85 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 660883 6.36 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 660904 112.46 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 659778 10.88 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 658696 176.66 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 661092 174.67 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 658727 98.19 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARATS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 660417 1,393.83 • 33.58 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 066296 35.00 MINNESOTA WANNER CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 066237 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 06 -15 -87 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 322 -30 066294 10- 4504 - 646 -64 066223 10- 4580 - 644 -64 066356 * ** —CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842-84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 40 -4540- 801 -80 86619 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4630 - 862 -86 50- 4630-862 -86 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4616- 560 -56 23 -4624- 613 -61 23- 4624- 613 -61 136532 23- 4624 - 613 -61 136705 10- 4504 - 133 -12 27- 4504 - 664 -66 .- _ 10- 4600- 420 -42 27918 1987 CITY OF EDINA ` CHECK REGISTER c CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 166360 06/02/87 16.25 MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES i 166360 06/02/87 7.50 MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES 166360 06/02/87 135.00 MINNESOTA WANNER TOOLS ' 227.33 166365 06/02/87 100.00 BURT MERFELD POLICE SERVICE 100.00 166366 06/09/87 130.68 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 166366 06/08/87 468.99 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY J 166366 06/09/87 334.69 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTORY 934.36 s * * *rws 166371 06/08/87 96.50 MILHOFF STEEL REPAIR PARTS ' 96.50 ' 166378 06/09/87 6,064.55 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 166378 06/08/87 8,214.55 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 166378 06/08/87 5,496.35— MARK VII SALES CORRECTION 166378 06/08/87 8,496.35 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 166378 06/08/87 5,496.35 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY ' 22,775.45 * * ** * ** 166381 06/03/87 288.66 STAR d TRIBUNE ADVERTISING .y 288.66 * ' 166400 06/09/87 2,917.71 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES 2,917.71 * 166412 06/03/87 129.60 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM 166412 06/04/87 88.82 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMM 166412 06/08/87 10.56— NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY - CREDIT / 207.86 * 166413 06/04/87 266.11 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 166413 06/09/87 43.56 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 309.67 * / w * *ww* 166417 06/09/87 _ -.. _. 420.00 OFFSET PRINTING _ PRINTING 420.00 of s 06 -15 -87 PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 322 -30 066294 10- 4504 - 646 -64 066223 10- 4580 - 644 -64 066356 * ** —CKS 10- 4100 - 430 -42 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842-84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 40 -4540- 801 -80 86619 50- 4630- 822 -82 50- 4630- 842 -84 50- 4630- 862 -86 50- 4630 - 862 -86 50- 4630-862 -86 10- 4212 - 510 -51 10- 4616- 560 -56 23 -4624- 613 -61 23- 4624- 613 -61 136532 23- 4624 - 613 -61 136705 10- 4504 - 133 -12 27- 4504 - 664 -66 .- _ 10- 4600- 420 -42 27918 c * ** —CKS ` c *** —CKS c * ** —CKS * ** —CKS ` * ** —CKS i i i Y * ** —CKS i i *** —CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166420 06/10/87 i *ei #i OLD DUTCH FOODS 166429 06/10/87 166429 06/08/87 166429 06/09/87 166429 06/08/87 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 166434 06/09/87 INVENTORY 346.65 166439 06/04/87 1,290.40 • 166443 06/08/87 166443 06/08/87 38.40 166448 06/10/87 PRIOR LAKE AG SAND GRAVEL 166452 06/10/87 166452 06/10/87 POMMER MFG CO MISC 166460 06/08/87 166460 06/08/87 166460 06/08/87 197.60 THE PRINT SHOP 166462 06/08/87 166462 06/08/87 166462 06/08/87 166462 06/08/87 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 06 -15 -87 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE 27- 4624- 663 -66 * ** —CKS 27- 4624- 663 -66 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** —CKS 28 -4274- 704 -70 14228 * ** —CKS 10- 4522 - 301 -30 * ** —CKS 10- 1139 - 000 -00 500441 10- 4504 - 627 -62 50042 CHECK REGISTER *** —CKS AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 175.85 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS 175.85 • 17152 311.60 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 191.60 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 440.55 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 346.65 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 1,290.40 • 38.40 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT 38.40 •** —CKS 298.76 PRIOR LAKE AG SAND GRAVEL 298.76 * 5305 304.11 POMMER MFG CO MISC 227.11 POMMER MFG CO GEN SUPPLIES 531.22 • 197.60 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 197.60 • 112.38 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 32.48 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 144.86 • 221.50 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 99.50 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 202.20 ROYAL CROWN BEV INVENTORY 523.20 • 150.00 RENTAL EQUIP 3 SALES EQUIP RENTAL 110.00 RENTAL EQUIP E SALES GEN SUPPLIES 17.30 RENTAL EQUIP 6 SALES TOOLS 76.80 RENTAL EQUIP & SALES TOOLS 354.10 • _ 06 -15 -87 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE 27- 4624- 663 -66 * ** —CKS 27- 4624- 663 -66 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632 - 842 -84 50- 4632- 862 -86 * ** —CKS 28 -4274- 704 -70 14228 * ** —CKS 10- 4522 - 301 -30 * ** —CKS 10- 1139 - 000 -00 500441 10- 4504 - 627 -62 50042 10- 4580 - 440 -44 5374 * ** —CKS *** —CKS 10- 4600- 628 -62 3737 - * ** —CKS 10- 4540 - 560-56 17152 10- 4540 - 560 -56 16694 * ** —CKS r 50- 4632- 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 50- 4632 - 862 -86 a •** —CKS 10- 4226 - 301 -30 5304 10- 4504 - 646 -64 5305 10 -4580- 440 -44 5462 10- 4580 - 440 -44 5374 * ** —CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166469 06/08/87 AMOUNT 78.08 78.08 75.00 75.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS RTW INC INSURANCE 06 -15 -87 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560-56 810887 10- 4260 - 510 -51 50.00 SATELLITE r * *rrr SERVICES - 166480 06/04/87 50.00 * 166482 06/10/87 166484 06/03/87 166485 06/08/87 166485 06/08/87 166486 06/09/87 ' 166486 06/09/87 166492 06/08/87 ' 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/02/87 ' 166492 06/02/87 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/08/87 ' 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/08/87 ' 166492 06/08/87 166492 06/02/87 166492 06/08/87 ' 166492 06/08/87 ' 166493 06/09/87 166493 06/09/87 itr *r• SOUTHDALE ' 166500 06/02/87 � •ii*ii 146315 AMOUNT 78.08 78.08 75.00 75.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS RTW INC INSURANCE 06 -15 -87 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560-56 810887 10- 4260 - 510 -51 50.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES SERVICES 27- 4201 - 664 -66 50.00 * 142.41 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 142.41 * 1,759.66 STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 123.00 STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX 10- 3113 - 000 -00 1,882.66 r 174.75 DON STREICHER GUNS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 470 -47 M41001 210.50 DON STREICHER GUNS SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642- 420 -42 M41028 385.25 i 68.95 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146315 23.01 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146322 196.00 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 146416 199.44 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146524 25.02 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 146118 42.54 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 147309 284.39 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146253 68.95 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146315 68.95- _ SOUTHDALE FORD CORRECTION 10- 4540 - 560 -56 42.54 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTAS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146260 25.02- SOUTHDALE FORD CREDIT 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146318 60.60 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 146867 25.00 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146323 83.07 SOUTHDALE FORD PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 146330 1,025.54 * . 5,253.55 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 147.50 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 862 -86 5,401.05 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 * _ **• -CKS * ** -CKS *** -CKS * ** -CKS ;r** -CKS *i* -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166502 06/08/87 166502 06/08/87 166502 06/08/87 166502 06/08/87 166502 06/08/87 166503 06/08/87 166503 06/08/87 166503 06/08/87 •rr +rr 73851 166505 06/04/87 166505 06/03/87 166505 06/09/87 rrrrrr 10,570.79 166508 06/08/87 166508 06/08/87 166508 06/03/87 rrrrrr EQUIP NEW 166516 06/08/87 rrrrrr 31,873.01 + 166526 06/02/87 166526 06/02/87 rrrrrr 28.22 166537 06/10/87 V rrrrrr . 166539 06/08/87 166539 06/10/87 rrrrrr 166542 06/08/87 rrrrrr REPAIR PARTS rr+ -CKS CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 14 , AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 8 MESSAGE 160.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTAS 10 -4248- 560 -56 1623 .64 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 73851 , 10,570.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET EQUIP NEW 10 -4901- 140 -14 52377 10,570.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET EQUIP NEW 10- 4901 - 200 -20 523827 10,570.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET EQUIP NEW 10- 4901 - 480 -48 52381 , 31,873.01 + 28.22 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 , 31.21 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 24.64 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 84.07 + + ++ -CKS 147.29 SUN ADVERTISIG 10- 4210 - 140 -14 , 15.96 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 2,390.00 SUN PRINTING 10- 4600- 500 -50 2,553.25 + rrr -CKS 27.36 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 31881 20.90 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516 - 611 -61 6152 32.37 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 4516 - 611 -61 6255 80.63 + rrr -CKS 43.02 SEARS ROEBUCK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 43.02 + rrr -CKS 3,132.10 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 45774 2,196.14 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 645773 5,328.24 + +r+ -CKS , 967.20 TRI STATE DRILLING REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 72248 967.20 + Y +r+ -CKS 441.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 643 -64 19208 S 469.58 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY WEED SPRAY 10 -4566- 642 -64 18908 910.58 + +r+ -CKS 9,360.75 THORPE DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 9,360.75 •_ __. ___. . rr+ -CKS AMOUNT 188.65 258.80 447.45 + 134.12 361.54 361.54- 361.54 29.40 - 70.56- 395.70 • 132.32 132.32 + 67.65 67.65 • 320.00 320.00 s 315.74 477.05 792.79 + 15.66 345.48 446.45 300.73 1,108.32 + 100.00 100.00 + 73.92 73.92 s 18.60 1,938.00 1,956.60 s CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS UNITED 1987 CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS CHECK NO. DATE CORP 166550 06/08/87 ELECTRIC 166550 06/08/87 UNITED ••ssss CORP REPAIR PARTAS 166553 06/08/87 CORP 166553 06/02/87 ELECTRIC 166553 06/02/87 W W GRAINGER 166553 06/02/87 166553 06/08/87 166553 06/08/87 POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 CECELIA SMITH 166569 06/09/87 sss + ++ GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 166573 06/02/87 EQUIP sss +ss 1276 166575 06/08/87 � •ssss+ 166582 06/09/87 166582 06/09/87 • ••ssss 166586 06/02/87 y 166586 06/10/87 166586 06/08/87 r 166586 06/08/87 r ssss+• 166590 06/02/87 s 166591 06/09/87 • 166592 06/10/87 166592 06/10/87 AMOUNT 188.65 258.80 447.45 + 134.12 361.54 361.54- 361.54 29.40 - 70.56- 395.70 • 132.32 132.32 + 67.65 67.65 • 320.00 320.00 s 315.74 477.05 792.79 + 15.66 345.48 446.45 300.73 1,108.32 + 100.00 100.00 + 73.92 73.92 s 18.60 1,938.00 1,956.60 s CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARATS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CORRECTION UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTAS UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT UNITED ELECTRIC CORP CREDIT 06 -15 -87 PAGE 15 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 —S6 13046 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13052 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4540- 646 -64 10- 4540 - 688 -68 10- 4540 - 688 -68 40- 4540 - 801 -80 40- 4540 - 801 -80 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL GASOLINE 28 -4612- 704 -70 VOSS GEN SUPPLIES 50- 4504 - 862 -86 17063 WATER PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 037809 + ++ —CKS +s+ —CKS +s+ —CKS + ++ —CKS + ++ —CKS GORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 27- 4612- 664 -66 1076 GORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 2T- 4612- 664 -66 1095 +++ —CKS W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARATS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 + ++ —CKS HENRY WROBLESKI POLICE SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 CECELIA SMITH MILAGE 10- 4208 - 140 -14 MID CENTRAL INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 1319 MID CENTRAL INC EQUIP 10- 4902- 440-44 1276 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166593 06/09/87 •w*rrw MINNESOTA CLAY 166603 06/04/87 w*w *w* 166613 06/08/87 166613 06/08/87 *r * * *r 166701 06/02/87 166702 06/02/87 166703 06/02/87 166704 06/02/87 166705 06/02/87 166706 06/10/87 166706 06/02/87 166707 06/02/87 166708 06/02/87 16E863 06/02/87 166709 06/02/87 166710 06/02/87 ' 166711 06/04/87 166711 06/02/87 - www *wr CONT SERV 166713 06/02/87 06 -15 -87 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE 23- 4624- 613 -61 02879 27- 4540- 666 -66 30982 10- 4540 - 520 -52 57530 10- 4620 - 560 -56 54586 40- 4248 - 801 -80 9364 10- 4901 - 260 -26 703347 10 -4206- 140 -14 10- 4200 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 184 -18 10- 4510 - 440 -44 050128 10- 4540 - 560 -56 050193 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4248 - 560 -56 14605 10- 4504 - 390 -30 10- 4504 - 301 -30 132748 10- 1132 - 000 -00 10 -4504- 133 -12 10- 4540 - 520 -52 28- 4201 - 702 -70 *** -CKS *** -CKS *** -CKS *** -CKS CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 349.91 MINNESOTA CLAY COST OF COMM 349.91 * 129.33 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 129.33 * 136.77 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 38.90 MCNEILUS STEEL PARTS 175.67 * 11,770.00 E H RENNER 6 SONS CONT REPAIRS 11,770.00 1,012.36 STREETER RICHARDSON EQUIP REPLAC 1,012.36 * 30.00 ASSO OF METRO MUNIC RESERVATION 30.00 * 500.00 LAKELAND FLORIST CONT SERV 500.00 * 498.75 BARRETT MOVING SERVICES 498.75 * 15.24 ROAD RESCUE 1ST AID SUPPLIES 30.70 ROAD RESCUE REPAIR PARTS 45.94 * 10.18 BLOOMINGTN LINOLEUM REPAIR PARTS 10.18 * 160.00 S d S WELDING CO CONT REPAIRS 69.58 229.58 K 5 K- DOIIS.SYSTEMS_ INC. GEN SUPPLIES 18.77 SCHAEFER EQUIPMENT GEN SUPPLIES 18.77 + 120.00 SUBURBAN PARATRANSIT FOOD DELIVERY 120.00 + 411.07 PIP PRINTING REPAIR PARTS 49.50 PIP PRINTING REPAIR PARATS 460.57 + 1,282.00 DEDE HENSEL SERVICES 06 -15 -87 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE 23- 4624- 613 -61 02879 27- 4540- 666 -66 30982 10- 4540 - 520 -52 57530 10- 4620 - 560 -56 54586 40- 4248 - 801 -80 9364 10- 4901 - 260 -26 703347 10 -4206- 140 -14 10- 4200 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 184 -18 10- 4510 - 440 -44 050128 10- 4540 - 560 -56 050193 10- 4540 - 520 -52 10- 4248 - 560 -56 14605 10- 4504 - 390 -30 10- 4504 - 301 -30 132748 10- 1132 - 000 -00 10 -4504- 133 -12 10- 4540 - 520 -52 28- 4201 - 702 -70 *** -CKS *** -CKS *** -CKS *** -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166714 06/02/87 166715 06/02/87 166716 06/02/87 166717 06/04/87 166718 06/02/87 166719 06/02/87 f 166719 06/02/87 166719 06/02/87 166720 06/02/87 166721 06/02/87 166722 06/03/87 166723 06/03/87 166724 06/03/87 10 -4248- 520 -52 09803 166725 06/03/87 10- 4504 - 133 -12 166726 06/03/87 ' 166727 06/03/87 166727 06/08/87 166728 06/03/87 166728 06/03/87 rssss• 166730 06/09/87 166730 06/08/87 AMOUNT 1,282.00 • 104.38 104.38 s 22.76 22.76 • 568.25 568.25 s 11,731.34 11,731.34 + 20.00 20.00 t 652.70 191.90 100.00 944.60 • 500.00 500.00 • 55.85 55.85 + 38.82 38.82 • 39.00 39.00 s 101.32 101.32 • 260.70 260.70 252.00 252.00 + 79.03 188.23 267.26 142.17 40.00 182.17 r 267.50 505.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION SYSTEM SUPPLY INC MARK ANDERSON WINFIELD DEVELOP INC NOAH WILLIAMS & ASSO S THUNDER SOUND INC RED WING SHOE STORE RED WING SHOE STORE RED WING SHOE STORE BILL BOCH TWIN CITY ELEVATOR SALAAM CATERING U S WEST PAGING. COMPUTER APPLICATION JOHN KEPRIOS ROSE HILL ASSO RUBENSTEIN d ZIFF RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF ED LANCELLO ED LANCELLO NORTH STAR ICE NORTH STAR ICE GEN SUPPLIES FILM BATTERIES MONTHLY LEASE MISC REGISTRATION UNIFORM ALLOW UNIFORM ALLOW UNIFORM ALLOW SET UP CHANGE FUND CONT REPAIRS COUNCIL MEALS GEN SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING CONFERENCE CONCESSIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF COMM MILEAGE RENTAL TILLER INVENTORY INVENTORY 06 -15 -87 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. Y MESSAGE 10- 4504 - 510-51 050978 10- 4504 - 490 -49 10- 4201 - 627 -62 25- 4946- 520-52 13843 28- 3500- 000 -00 10- 4262- 301 -30 10- 4262- 646 -64 40- 4262- 801 -80 30- 1040 - 000 -00 10 -4248- 520 -52 09803 10 -4504- 100 -10 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4233 - 560 -56 504370 10 -4202- 600 -60 . 26- 4624- 683 -68 23 -4588- 611 -61 069937 23- 4624- 613 -61 069084 10 -4208- 390 -30 10- 4504 - 390 -30 50- 4632- 822 -82 50 -4632- 842 -84 • *• -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 166730 06/08/87 503.50 NORTH STAR ICE INVENTORY 166730 06/04/87 90.00 NORTH STAR ICE INVENTORY 1,366.50 * 166731 06/04/87 50.00 GREATER MPLS AREA GEN SUPPLIES 50.00 * 166732 06/04/87 6.50 LIEN INFEC CONTROL SERVICES 6.50 * 166733 06/04/87 124.00 AMERICSN PLANNING DUES 124.00 * 166734 06/04/87 110.82- GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CORRECTION 166734 06/04/87 1,130.32- GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CORRECTION 166734 06/04/87 110.32 GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 166734 06/04/87 1,130.32 GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 166734 06/04/87 110.82 GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 110.32 * 166735 06/04/87 75.00 DARYLNE EDMAN SERVICES 75.00 * 166736 06/04/87 28.82 ANDON INC ADVERTISING 28.82 * 166737 06/04/87 653.75 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 166861 06/04/87 198.38 - -89e.13 -t BLUMBERG COMMUNICATION MISC EQUIP 166738 06/04/87 278.82 APRONS UNLIMITED LAUNDRY 278.82 * 166739 06/04/87 100.00 HELEN ZABEL POSTERS 100.00 * 166740 06/04/87 29.88 PAT GREER SUPPLIES 29.88 * 166741 06/04/87 25.00 DON NELSON SERVICES 25.00 * 166742 06/04/87 25.00 NATALIE NELSON SERVICES - 25.00 * 166743 06/04/87 25.00 JILL WEINAND SERVICES 25.00 * 166744 06/04/87 25.00 MARY WARREN SERVICES 25.00 * 166745 06/04/87 50.00 JAMES SINGELTON LIFE SUPPORT COURSE 50.00 * _ 166746 06/04/87 7.42 HENN CTY DEPT POSTAGE 06 -15 -87 PAGE 18 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 4632- 862 -86 50 -4632- 862 -86 10- 4504 - 200 -20 27- 4201- 664 -66 10- 4204- 120 -12 27- 4624- 663 -66 27- 4624- 663 -66 27- 4624- 663 -66 27 -4624- 663 -66 27- 4624- 663 -66 27- 4201 - 662 -66 9174 23 -4214- 611 -61 4095 23- 4600- 611 -61 27- 1388- 000 -00 62265 27- 4262 - 663 -66 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10 -4202- 440 -44 10- 4290 - 140 -14 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE - 166746 06/04/87 166746 06/04/87 166747 06/04/87 166747 06/04/87 166748 06/04/87 166748 06/04/87 J 166749 06/04/87 166749 06/04/87 166750 06/04/87 166750 06/04/87 166751 06/04/87 166752 06/04/87 166752 06/10/87 ' 166753 06/04/87 166753 06/04/87 ' 166754 06/08/87 166755 06/08/87 ' 166756 06/08/87 / 166757 06/08/87 166757 ' 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 ' 166758 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 166758 06/08/87 166759 06/08/87 AMOUNT 7.43 7.43- 7.42 * 36.12 132.30 168.42 * .42 12.60 13.02 * 253.58 5.67 259.25 * 48.09 847.35 895.44 * 22.00 22.00 * 100.00 75.00 175.00 * 750.00 750.00 1,500.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 61.95 61.95 * 415.00 415.00 * 275.90 263.00 538.90 * 362.53 15.44 40.19 65.22 168.19 76.76 36.17 764.50 * 27.96 27.96 * CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION HENN CTY DEPT POSTAGE HENN CTY DEPT CORRECTION HARRY MELIN MILEAGE HARRY MELIN SERVICES WILLIAM OTT MILEAGE WILLIAM OTT SERVICES FLORENCE NORBACK SERVICES FLORENCE NORBACK MILEAGE HOWARD NORBACK MILEAGE HOWARD NORBACK SERVICES BONNIE HINKLEY REFUND LOLA EDMAN SERVICES LOLA EDMAN SERVICSE THOMPSON PBLG CONT REPAIRS THOMPSON PBLG CONT REPAIRS D C HEY GEN SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CO GEN SUPPLIES SAYLORS SOFTWARE 1ST OFFICE EQUIPMENT SWANSON BROS COMP CONSTRUCTION SWANSON BROS COMP CONSTRCTION SUPERIOR PLASTIC GEN SUPPLIES SUPERIOR PLASTIC CONT REPAIRS SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS SUPERIOR PLASTIC REPAIR PARTS LYNDALE GARDENS GEN SUPPLIES 06 -15 -87 PAGE 19 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. A MESSAGE 10- 4290 - 140 -14 10- 4290 - 140 -14 10 -4208- 184 -18 10- 4236 - 184 -18 10- 4208 - 184 -18 10- 4236- 184 -18 10 -4201- 184 -18 10- 4208 - 184 -18 10- 4208 - 184 -18 10- 4236- 184 -18 10- 1145 - 000 -00 27 -4201- 662 -66 27 -4201- 662 -66 9175 40 -4248- 803 -80 40- 4248 - 812 -80 10- 4504 - 133 -12 034144 26- 4504 - 682 -68 4870 27- 1330 - 000 -00 033941 60- 1300 - 182 -03 7540 60- 1300 - 182 -03 7439 10- 4504 - 646 -64 11800 26- 4248 - 682 -68 12009 40- 4540 - 801 -80 11965 40- 4540- 803 -80 11843 40- 4540 - 803 -80 11935 40- 4540 - 803 -80 12129 40- 4540- 803 -80 11999 10- 4504 - 646 -64 84280 s 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 166760 06/08/87 42.00 AUTO SERVICE CENTER CONT REPAIRS 42.00 * 166761 06/08/87 292.71 DIESEL INJECTION SP CONT REPAIRS 292.71 * 166762 06/08/87 89.95 BRUNSON INST CO TOOLS 89.95 * 166763 06/08/87 66.02 AMSTAR GEN SUPPLIES 66.02 * 166764 06/08/87 74.94 TC HOME JUICE INVENTORY 74.94 * 166765 06/08/87 22.80 BUDGET PAPER REPAIR PARTS 22.80 ; 166766 06/08/87 32.03 NS DODGE CENTER REPAIR PARTS 32.03 166767 06/08/87 60.66 THE PREST COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 60.66 166768 06/08/87 3.00 NORTHSTAR AUTO REPAIR PARTS 3.00 * 166769 06/08/87 64.98 ROTO ROOTER REPAIR PARATS 64.98 * 166770 06/08/87 63.90 INLAND TRUCK PARTS REPAIR PARTS 63.90 * 166771 06/08/87 378.60 MECO REPAIR PARTS 378.60 * 166772 06/08/87 26.92 VESSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 26.92 * 166773 06/08/87 44.25 POOLS INC GEN SUPPLIES 44.25 * 166774 06/08/87 44.58- TIMS TREE SERVICE CORRECTION 166774 06/08/87 44.58 TIMS TREE SERVICE CONT REPAIRS 166774 06/08/87 4,458.00 TIMS TREE SERVICE CONT REPAIRS 4,458.00 * 166775 06/08/87 625.00 HALLA NURSERY GEN SUPPLIES 625.00 * 166776 06/08/87 105.00 LANDSCAPE & TURF GEN SUPPLIES 166776 06/08/87 - - -- 225.00 LANDSCAPE 6 TURF SOD BLACK DIRT- - 330.00 * 06 -15 -87 PAGE 20 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 8 MESSAGE 10- 4248 - 560 -56 10 -4248- 560-56 5978 10- 4580 - 644 -64 068052 10- 4504 - 646 -64 12942 50- 4632- 842 -84 10- 4540 - 540 -54 02416 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3815 40- 4540 - 801 -80 1386 10- 4540 - 560 -56 3360 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10- 4540 - 560 -56 103491 10- 4540 - 560 -56 471525 40 -4540- 805 -80 3352 10- 4504 - 133 -12 28482 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10- 4248 - 644 -64 10 -4248- 644 -64 10- 4504 - 644 -64 27- 4504 - 664 -66 2667 27- 4562 - 664 -66 2667 ** * -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 21 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. 0 MESSAGE 166778 06/08/87 195.00 OSCAR WADENSTEIN AMBULANCE REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 195.00 * 166779 06/08/87 340.00 BUSINESS 6 SEMINAR 40- 4202 - 800 -80 340.00 * 166780 06/08/87 28.43 S H BARTLETT COMP CONT REPAIRS 26 -4248- 682 -68 23046 28.43 * 166781 06/08/87 310.22 LARRY THAYER TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 28- 4202 - 701 -70 310.22 166782 06/08/87 597.00 BAILEY NURSERIES TREES 10- 4560 - 644 -64 597.00 * 166783 06/08/87 59.56 DIANA HEDGES HARDWARE 23- 4504 - 612 -61 166783 06/08/87 23.00 DIANA HEDGES SUPPLIES 23 -4642- 611 -61 82.56 * 166784 06/08/87 353.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL INSTRUCTOR FEE 23- 4201 - 611 -61 353.00 * 166785 06/08/87 100.00 HEATHER HENKEL MAINTENANCE 23 -4120- 612 -61 100.00 * 166786 06/08/87 17.70 DAVID DOUGHMAN CRAFT SUPPLIES 23- 4642 - 611 -61 17.70 * 166787 06/08/87 39.95 LABELS UNLIMITED ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 611 -61 39.95 * 166788 06/08/87 13.95 GENERAL OFFICE PROD GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510-51 13.95 * 166789 06/08/87 679.00 COMPUTER APPLIC SERVICE CONTRACT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 512420 679.00 * * * * * ** * * * -CKS 166791 06/08/87 249.75 MASYO DIST INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 249.75 * 166792 06/08/87 49.98 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 49.98 * 166793 06/08/87 150.00 LEFFLER PRINTING CO PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 2468 150.00 * 166794 06/08/87 870.00 DUFFEY PAPER COMPANY PAPER SUPPLIES 10- 4514- 510 -51 709823 870.00 * 166795 06/08/87 24.95 SMALL ENGINE CTIY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 08888 166795 06/08/87 176.08 SMALL ENGINE CTIY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 08544 201.03 * 1987 Ca., OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 166796 06/08/87 11225.99 VERSATILE VEHICLES REPAIR PARTS 1,225.99 * 166797 06/08/87 5,300.00 MN PETROLEUM SERV GARAGE EQUIP 5,300.00 * 166798 06/08/87 275.00 STATES ELECTRIC MFG CONSTRUCTION 275.00 * 166799 06/09/87 525.00 LAURA COOPER ARBITRATORS FEE 525.00 * 166800 06/09/87 107.15 INMAC GEN SUPPLIES 107.15 * 166801 06/09/87 25.00 PLUNKETTS INC GEN SUPPLIES 25.00 * 166802 06/09/87 1,166.71 COMMISSIONER OF GASOLINE 1,166.71 * 166803 06/09/87 150,275.00 FIRST TRUST UNAP SURPLUS 150,275.00 * 166804 06/09/87 749.51 IBM CORP EQUIP RENTAL s 749.51 * 166805 06/09/87 10.00 HENN CTY PUBLIC CONT SERV 10.00 * 166806 06/09/87 45.65 DIANE HEDGES SUPPLIES r 45.65 * 166807 06/09/87 160.00 LYLE HOOFNAGLE MAINTENANCE 160.00 * 166808 06/09/87 192.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY MAINTENANCE 192.00 * 166809 06/09/87 142.50 J THOMAS NELSON INSTRUCTOR 142.50 * 166810 06/09/87 18.64 RAY GORMLEY ADVERTISING 18.64 * 166811 06/09/87 45.00 MARIAN ALSTAD SUPPLIES 45.00 * 166812 06/09/87 24.86 NAOMI JOHNSON ADVERTISING 166812 06/09/87 13.84 NAOMI JOHNSON GEN SUPPLIES 166812 06/09/87 13.50 NAOMI JOHNSON OFFICE SUPPLIES 166812 06/09/87 15.49 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES r, 67.69 • 166813 06/09/87 175.00 LAUGHLINS SERVICES 06 -15 -87 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 27- 4540 - 665 -66 25- 4926- 540 -54 18622 60- 1300 - 264 -04 80925 10 -4201- 140 -14 10- 4504 - 510 -Si 28- 4504 - 702 -70 356326 10- 4612- 560-56 66 -2490- 000 -00 10- 4226- 510 -51 10- 4200 - 500 -50 23- 4504 - 611 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4120 - 612 -61 23- 4201 - 611 -61 23- 4214 - 611 -61 23- 4624 - 613 -61 23- 4214 - 611 -61 23- 4504 - 612 -61 23- 4516 - 611 -61 23- 4588 - 611 -61 23- 4201- 612 -61 07295 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166814 166815 166816 166817 166818 166819 166820 166821 166822 166822 166823 166824 166825 166826 166827 166828 166829 166829 166829 166829 166830 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/10/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 AMOUNT 175.00 • 41.16 41.16 • 99.50 99.50 • 38.00 38.00 • 454.90 454.90 • 13.50 13.50 • 39.00 39.00 • 181.31 181.31 • 21.77 21.77 .• 706.85 306.15 1,013.00 • 116.88 116.88 • 112.50 112.50 • 27.00 27.00 • 145.00 145.00 • 25.00 25.00 t 30.00 30.00 • 18.50 18.50 18.50 18.50 74.00 • 269.50 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION IRS DALE LUNDGREN S M SCOTT SANDLER SKATE SPORT LAW ENFORCEMENT EDINA PET HOSPITAL SHORELINE PRESSWRITE TROPHJIES SHERIFFS DEPT SHERIFFS DEPT JAMES FISCHER ROBERT CLABO BILLIE MOIR NATIONAL CABLE TV EDINA SR HIGH SCHOOL RICHARD M LUTZ AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX AUTO SOUND ENTRONIX TODD ANDERSON GEN SUPPLIES MILEAGE REFUND PAINT MEETING EXPENSES SERVICES GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES EQUIP RENTAL ROOM & BOARD SEMINAR UNIFORM ALLOW PARKING AWARD YEARBOOK SEMINAR EQUIP MAINT EQUIP MAINT EQUIP MAINT EQUIP MAINT SERVICES 06 -15 -87 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 28- 4504 - 702 -70 17504 10- 4208 - 133 -12 10- 3500- 000 -00 28- 4544 - 702 -70 10585 10 -4206- 430 -42 10- 4201- 470-47 10 -4504- 470 -47 175793 10- 4504 - 430 -42 0145 10 -4226- 420 -42 10 -4286- 220 -22 10 -4202- 420 -42 10- 4266- 420 -42 10 -4208- 420 -42 10 -2149- 000 -00 10 -4502- 420 -42 10- 4202 - 420 -42 10 -4274- 420 -42 3606 10- 4274 - 420 -42 3602 10 -4274- 420 -42 3669 10- 4274- 420 -42 3609 10- 4201 - 630 -62 1987 C►.. OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166831 166832 166833 166834 166834 166835 166835 166836 166836 166836 166836 166836 166836 166836 166836 166837 166837 166838 166839 166840 166841 166842 166843 166844 166845 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/09/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 AMOUNT 269.50 * 3,855.14 3,855.14 * 304.49 304.49 * 43.10 43.10 * 378.00 34.65 412.65 * 20,977.90 83,911.60 104,889.50 * 45.86 33.81 59.25 72.00 58.96 111.48 17.65 17.12 416.13 * 60.75 15.90 76.65 * 743.49 743.49 * 10.00 10.00 * 20.00 20.00 * 33.00 33.00 * 54.00 54.00 * 25.00 25.00 * 29,583.75 29,583.75 * 3,759.58 CHECK h- STER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION HENN CTY TREASURER. PLANT EQUIPMENT INC TNT RADIO SALES INC ERIC ANDERSON ERIC ANDERSON MOTOROLA INC MOTOROLA INC EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY EDINA POLICE PETTY JOYCE REPYA PW JOYCE REPYA PW HENNEPIN COUNTY MED ALL FIRE TEST INC LINDA EUGSTER LYNN PORRITT SANDRA RIEDEL JEFF SHARPIRO DAVID H VOKLMANN PIPECO CONTRACTING ROOM R BOARD EQUIP REPLACE EQUIP REPLACE SERVICES MILEAGE EQUIP REPLACEMNT EQUIP REPLAC CABLE CABLE ACCT MEETING EXP MILEAGE BOOK ACCT GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES AMMUN ACCT NEW EQUIP LIC PLATES MOUSETRAP 1ST AID SPLY EQUIP MAINT REFUND REFUND REFUND COSTUME CHARACTERA PAYENT PAYMENT 06 -15 -87 AGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10 -4286- 220 -22 13605 10- 4901 - 420 -42 12106 10- 4901 - 420 -42 15745 10- 4201 - 500 -50 10 -4206- 500 -50 10- 4901 - 420 -42 10 -4901- 420 -42 10- 2149 - 000 -00 10 -4206- 420 -42 10- 4208 - 420 -42 10- 4502 - 420 -42 10- 4504- 420 -42 10- 4504 - 420 -42 10- 4572- 420 -42 10- 4902 - 420 -42 10- 4310- 560 -56 10- 4504 - 540 -54 10- 4510 - 440 -44 5483 10 -4274- 440-44 7827 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4504 - 133 -12 60- 2040 - 000 -00 60- 2040 - 000 -00 t 1987 CITY OFEDINA CHECK NO. DATE 166846 166847 166848 166849 166850 166851 166852 166853 166853 166854 166855 166856 166857 166858 166859 166859 166859 166860 166860 rrrrrs 166862: 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/16/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/10/87 06/08/87 AMOUNT 3,759.58 r 48,690.98 48,690.98 r 11,243.00 11,243.00 r 172.52 172.52 r 222.00 222.00 r 39.20 39.20 r 49.00 49.00 r 35.00 35.00 r 94.11 31.03 125.14 r 17.79 17.79 r 30.00 30.00 r 220.00 220.00 r 182.54 182.54 r 3,406.67 3,406.67 r 54.00 54.00 54.00 162.00 r 4,813.00 1,250.00 6,063.00 r 75.83 75.83 r CHECK REGISTER 06 -15 -87 PAGE 25 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. A MESSAGE BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS PAYMENT 60- 2040 - 000 -00 JOE GRUEPHER JUNE LESSONS 27 -4100- 661 -66 KUSTOM ELECTRONICS PAYMENT 10- 4901 - 420 -42 DAVES FOOD WAGON CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 BARBARA LUNDGREN ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 DONNA LAPORTE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 BETY BELL PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 MOLLIE PAULSON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 MOLLIE PAULSON PERN SERVICES 23 -4120- 613 -61 AM ARTIST BOOK CLUB DUES 23- 4204 - 611 -61 COLUMBIA BOOKS INC BOOKS 10 -4502- 600 -60 METRO AREA EMERGENCY KENNEL SERV 10 -4278- 470 -47 KORTUEMS SALE & SERV REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 666 -66 CLEAN FLO LAB INDIANHEAD LAKE 10- 2242 - 000 -00 BUREAU OF ALCOHAL SPEC TAX 50- 4310 - 820 -82 BUREAU OF ALCOHAL SPEC TAX 50- 4310- 840 -84 BUREAU OF ALCOHAL SPEC TAX 50- 4310 - 860 -86 CAMPBELL CONSULTANT CABLE TV 10 -2148- 000-00 CAMPBELL CONSULTANT CABLE TV 10 -2148- 000 -00 COPY DUPLICATING PRODUCTS INC.GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 rrr —CKS 1V rIi 10 io 10 11/ '0 10 1987 C. . OF EDINA CHECK k 8TER 06 -15 -87 ,GE 26 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE •rrrrr rrr —CKS 243,625.12 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,574.00 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 17,031.34 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 545.92 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 22,814.99 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 2,850.45 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 650.00 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 42,489.21 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 85,907.14 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 83,636.05 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND 150,275.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION M2 653,399.22 TOTAL APPROVED FOR PAYMENT CHECK REGISTER DATED G; d/ % PAGES THROUGH ,IG MANA DAT I A E IRE R AT Computer checks AI's 78511 thru 78804 1487 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 • *rrr* 125135 rsr *r* 125138 125138 125138 125138 125138 125138 125138 srsrrr 125285 125285 125285 125285 125285 . 125285 •sssss 125435 rr* *s* 125451 s *rsr• 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 132067 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 05/21/87 70.34 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 70.34 06/04/87 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 69.35- JOHNSON WINE CITY 69.35 JOHNSON WINE 402.75 .00 JOHNSON WINE DISTRI .00 JOHNSON WINE CAPITAL .00 * DISTRI 06/04/87 42.83 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 42.83 * 06/04/87 .00 18.20 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 18.20- ED PHILLIPS CORRECTION 60.55 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 60.55- ED PHILLIPS CORRECTION 29.00 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 72.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 49.50 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 151.00 DISTRI 1.75 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 39.55 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 18.20 JOHNSON WINE INVENOTRY 41.65 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 31.15 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 60.55 JOHNSON WINE INVENOTRY 192.85 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 34.25 PRIOR WINE INVENTORY 34.25 70.34 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 70.34 06/04/87 4.50- CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 6.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 402.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 10.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 383.20 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 .00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 7.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 578.20 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 223.96 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 06/04/87 6.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 1,613.61 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 OS -31 -87 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL s*s -CKS 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50 -4632- 822 -82 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL s 9 7 7 7I 7 1987 l OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE sss *ss 06/04/87 132129 06/04/87 132129 06/04/87 ,132129 06/04/87 ssssss 06/04/87 132135 06/04/87 132135 06/04/87 132135 06/04/87 ;132135 06/04/87 132135 05/21/87 132135 06/04/87 132135 06/04/87 132135 05/21/87 132135 05/21/87 s+ss** 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/G4/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 AMOUNT CHECK VENDOR 21165.85 BELLBOY 3,627.35 BELLBOY 7,116.66 BELLBOY 12,909.86 + 7.31 - 10.91- 10.09- 365.45 174.19 545.54 504.70 108.11 74.82 1,744.50 + 56.96 — .91- 2.98- 148.75- 6.13- 2.21- 2.21 2.21 - 2.21- 2.21- 6.12- 2.21 2.21 2.21 76.08 - 4.55- 3.23- 2,848.08 7,437.49 3,803.78 298.35 90.60 612.20 221.27- 221.27 221.27 221.27- 221.27 221.27 221.27 - 221.27- 613.25 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS ED PHILLIPS STER 05 -31 -8' iGE 2 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE * ** —CKS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL * ** —CKS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL SO- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL INVENTORY 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL INVENTORY 50- 4632-862 -86 MANUAL + ** —CKS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL SO- 3710- 822 -52 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL SO -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL SO- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL t s s ;s 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 132138 06/04/87 132138 06/04/87 132138 05/21/87 132138 05/21/87 132138 05/21/87 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 132190 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/67 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 06/04/87 CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -87 PAGE 3 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 323.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 455.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 54.90 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 78.30 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.88 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 16,321.27 * * * -CKS 70.08- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11.35- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 3,504.09 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.47- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 569.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862-86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 567.49- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE Y 132190 06/04/87 132190 06/04/87 132190 05/21/87 s r s s y rirrrr 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 132285 %132285 •rrrrr 132433 132433 CHECK iSTER AMOUNT VENDOR 567.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 567.49— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 49.88 GRIGGS COOPER 4,042.05 + 06/04/87 69.35— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 58.57 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 3.00— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 58.57— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 3.98— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 .59— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 58.57— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 11.24— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 189.43— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 12.17— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 5.02— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2.22— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 1.45— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 50.01— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 9.57— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2,944.56— JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2,944.56 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 15.75 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2,928.81 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 40.95 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 9,470.57 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 11.90 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2,500.69 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 300.00 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 3.50 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 59.10 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 397.58 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 6.30 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 27.65 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 501.62 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 8.05 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 1,124.00 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 1,218.18 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 955.09 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 20.65 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 2.80 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 220.74 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 143.37 JOHNSON WINE 06/04/87 3.85 JOHNSON WINE 19,560.30 + 06/04/87 129.00 PAUSTIS & SONS 06/04/87 4.00 PAUSTIS R SONS 05 -31 -8 AGE 4 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. R MESSAGE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50 -3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862-86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862-86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822-82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628-842-84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628-862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50 -4628- 822 -82 + ++ —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL rrr —CKS MANUAL MANUAL 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 132433 06/04/87 7.20 132433 06/04/87 370.40 132433 06/04/87 273.57- 132433 06/04/87 273.57 132433 06/04/87 6.00 132433 •06/04/87 273.57 132433 06/04/87 6.00 — 132433 06/04/87 6.00 d SONS 790.17 + • +rsrs 132435 06/04/87 CHECK REGISTER PRIOR 05 -31 -87 PAGE 5 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE PAUSTIS & SONS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL PAUSTIS d SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL PAUSTIS R SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL PAUSTIS d SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 132435 06/04/87 6.14— PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 1.62— PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 6.34— PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 .22 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 .22 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 .22— .' PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 81.19 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 .00 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 317.00 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 11.40— PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 11.40— PRIOR WINE CO 132435 06/04/87 11.40 PRIOR WINE CO 132435 05/21/87 34.25 PRIOR WINE 407.16.+ ssrsrs 132451 06/04/87 3.43— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 16.39— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 79.47— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 14.64— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 .05 QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 43.86— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 6.79— " QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 819.12 QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 3,973.43 QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 2,193.17 QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 344.00 QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 4.89— QUALITY WINE 132451 06/04/87 1,461.90 QUALITY WINE ,132451 06/04/87 677.10 QUALITY WINE 9,299.30 + 50- 3700 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 =84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50 -3710- 862-86 50 -4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628 - 842 -84 50- 4628 - 862 -86 srsrsr 132788 06/04/87 231.50 'SALUD AMERICA, INC. 50 -4628- 862 -86 231.50 + 132789 06/04/87 256.56 MN WINEGROWERS COOP 50- 4628- 842 -84 256.56 + 133095 05/21/87 299.82 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 10 -3357- 000 -00 srs —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL sss —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL rsr —CKS MANUAL MANUAL +s+ —CKS MANUAL 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE _ 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 _ 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 133095 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 J 133251 05/21/87 � ttti *t 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 133396 05/21/87 135174 05/21/87 1135174 05/21/87 TELEPHONE 10- 4226 - 160 -16 138463 05/21/87 0 138463 05/21/87 rrrttr 10- 4256- 510 -51 138506 05/21/87 ` 138506 05/21/87 ., •rrttt 10- 4256 - 646 -64 AMOUNT 233.16 8,395.72 74.34 74.53 1,283.22 7,399.69 13,616.51 12,413.49 43,790.48 330,000.00 330,000.00 283.91 60.25 7.85 3,853.89 108.04 42.41 73.51 141.80 49.94 325.91 348.05 38.68 113.43 307.80 154.96 186.91 130.74 6,228.08 • 107,000.00 107,000.00- .00 • CHECK VENDOR COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE COMM OF REVENUE EDINA HRA NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL NW BELL 1ST SD NTL BK 1ST SD NTL BK 2,564.65 REX DIST 2,853.40 REX DIST 5,418.05 • 9,953.51 SW FIDELITY 224.27 SW FIDELITY 10,177.78 r LSTER 05 -31 -6 AGE 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE SALES TAX 23- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 29 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 40 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 50 -3357- 001 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 002 -00 MANUAL SALES TAX 50-3357-003 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL *** -CKS TELEPHONE 10- 4201 - 622 -62 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10- 4226 - 160 -16 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 460 -46 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 510 -51 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 628 -62 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 646 -64 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10 -4504- 133 -12 MANUAL TELEPHONE 23- 4256 - 611 -61 MANUAL TELEPHONE 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL TELEPHONE 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL TELEPHONE 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 821 -82 MANUAL TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS BANK TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL BANK TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL *** -CKS CONTRIBUTION 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL CONTRIBUTION 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 1.987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 138700 05/21/87 ,138700 05/21/87 138701 05/21/87 138701 05/21/87 138702 05/21/87 •kkiii 06/04/87 138803 05/21/87 kkiiik 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/04/87 139067 06/01/87 139067 06/01/87 139135 06/04/87 it 139129 06/04/87 139129 06/04/87 � 139129 06/04/87 qi, 139129 06/04/87 139129 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 139135 06/04/87 AMOUNT 2,000.00 95.00 2,095.00 k 21,160.93 189.90 21,350.83 k 238.76 238.76 i 53,833.88 53,833.88 k 20.04- 7.00 245.19 144.00 601.25 4.00 11.00 421.26 7.00 46.50 62.00 1,529.16 k 846.54 3,989.34 714.14 2,461.42 2,461.42 - -A{T--k 8,011.44 9.11 - 6.95- 2.14- 17.22- 3.54- .36 455.69 106.80 347.65 178.00 17.79- 860.77 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION POSTMASTER POSTAGE POSTMASTER POSTAGE PERA CONTRIBUTION COMMERCIAL LIFE INSURANCE STATE AGENCY REV FUND BURY & CARLSON CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITOL CITY CAPITOL CITY BELLBOY BELLBOY BELLBOY BELLBOY BELLBOY EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE PAYMENT INVENTORY INVENTORY 05 -31 -87 PAGE 7 ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. R MESSAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4290-510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4157 - 510 -S1 MANUAL 10- 4149 - 510 -S1 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 kii -CKS 60 -2040- 000 -00 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 kki -CKS SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL SO -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL SO- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL iii -CKS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL iii -CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL r s r 1987 OF EDINA CHECK :STER 05 -31 -8 AGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. • MESSAGE 139135 06/01/87 46.75 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 1,939.27 r +ssss sss —CKS 139138 06/04/87 68.47— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 9.57— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822-82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 3.63— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 .87— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 2.21— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 8.96— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 .61— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 5.71— ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 6.75— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 87.09— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 7.55— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 3.48— ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 7.55— ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 7.55 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 11.00— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 3,423.52 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 337.48 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 87.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 363.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 956.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 286.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 570.56 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 61.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 895.90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 764.60— ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 764.60 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 11099.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862-86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 4,354.62 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 348.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/04/87 754.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139138 06/01/87 15.66 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 MANUAL 13,338.49 v sta��t • *+ —CKS 139190 06/04/87 50.66— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139190 06/04/87 22.83— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 139190 06/04/87 33.57— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139190 06/04/87 2,533.01 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139190 06/04/87 1,141.46 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626-842 -84 MANUAL ,139190 06/04/87 1,678.27 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 5,245.68 • •irsri • *• —CKS 139285 06/04/87 7.00— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 1.00— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 50.09— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 .98 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 8.26— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -87 PAGE 9 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. Y P.O. M MESSAGE 139285 06/04/87 6.11- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 71.85- JOHNSON WINE 4 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 6.26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 13928S 06/04/87 5.31- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 83.24- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 7.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 .48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 10.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 2,504.59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 349.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 48.76- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 371.91- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 1.05- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 3,592.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 372.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 371.91 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 1.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 21.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 2.60- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862-86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 23.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 4,161.96 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 7.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 826.22 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 1.40 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 100.94 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 13.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 609.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 626.52 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 9.67- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 7.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 18.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 48.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 4.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 794.34 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139285 06/04/87 531.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL i 139285 06/04/87 .70 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 13,577.72 • * *t * ** * * * -CKS 139435 06/04/87 10.57- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 1.70- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 3.40- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 2.74- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 5.15- PRIOR WINE CO SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 5.10- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 528.48 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 84.95 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 136.97 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 11.40- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 169.90 PRIOR WINE CO 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 254.85 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 139435 06/04/87 --___ 257:55....._..... - ..._... - ..........._ . -_._ _,_ -.... _.PRIOR WINE CO .- 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1,392.64 + . 05 -31 —E AGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE srs —CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 1987 OF EDINA MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 CHECK LSTER y CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION "� •ssrss 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 139451 06/04/87 30.60— QUALITY WINE MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 139451 06/04/87 6.62— QUALITY WINE 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 139451 06/04/87 17.47— QUALITY WINE srr —CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 139451 06/04/87 9.32— QUALITY WINE srs —CKS 139451 06/04/87 3.48— QUALITY WINE MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 139451 06/04/87 26.99— QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 139451 06/04/87 10.98— QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 27.14— QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 1,529.75 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 873.17 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 1,356.35 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 662.00 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 930.85 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 1,096.90 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 2,697.95 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/04/87 347.85 QUALITY WINE 139451 06/01/87 30.19 QUALITY WINE INVENTORY 9,392.41 r wrwrwr 140415 06/01/87 91212.25 MED CENTER HOSPITALIZATION 9,212.25 s srssws 142198 06/01/87 7,041.40 GROUP HEALTH HOSPITALIZATION 7,041.40 s •rwrss 142442 06/01/87 12,311.57 PHP HOSPITALIZATION 12,311.57 s wrirr! 142753 06/01/87 154.60 MET HEALTH HOSPITALIZATION 154.60 s � sssrss 147067 06/04/87 87.75 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 147067 06/04/87 3.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 147067 06/04/87 22.50— CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 147067 06/04/87 1,304.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 147067 06/04/87 18.00 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 147067 06/04/87 14.50 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 1147067 06/04/87 496.59 CAPITAL CITY DISTRI 1,901.34 s •swsrs - .., .. . 147135 06/04/87 .22 EAGLE WINE 05 -31 —E AGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE srs —CKS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL rrs —CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL srr —CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL rrr —CKS 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL srs —CKS 10- 4156-510 -51 MANUAL rss —CKS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL srs —CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1'987 CITY OF EDINA 13,014.21 • CHECK REGISTER OS -31 -87 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. b MESSAGE 147135 06/04/87 7.93— EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 147135 06/04/87 8.96— EAGLE WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 147135 06/04/87 396.40 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147135 06/04/87 21.82— EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147135 06/04/87 4.47.99 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147135 06/04/87 6.53— EAGLE WINE 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL ' 799.37 i iii -CKS 147138 06/01/87 25— ED PHILLIPS DISCOUNT 50 -3710- 003 -00 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 3.75— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822-82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 35.93— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 1.46— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 5.65— ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 7.73— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 71.91— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 3.29— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 2.75— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 107.50— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 1,796.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 3,595.48 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842-84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 5,374.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 375.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 145.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-822-82 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 773.15 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 564.85 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 275.20 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147138 06/04/87 328:90 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL '147138 06/01/87 25.00 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL iss —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL iss —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL I 1 t f r r l c MANUAL t t 13,014.21 • siisss 147190 06/04/87 24.88— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 822 -82 147190 06/04/87 134.21— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 147190 06/04/87 60.29— GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710-862 -86 147190 06/04/87 1,243.87 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 147190 06/04/87 6,710.43 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 ,147190 06/04/87 3,014.26 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 10,749.18 • 147285 06/04/87 22.62— JOHNSON WINE 50 -3700- 822 -82 147285 06/04/87 74.29— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 147285 06/04/87 117.44— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 147285 06/04/87 80.73 —... JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 147285 06/04/87 61.79— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 862 -86 14728S 06/04/87 7.62— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 7.62- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 147285 06/04/87 4.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 147285 06/04/87 7.62 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 147285 06/04/87 _____ .. -_ _._7.07 = JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 147285 06/04/87. 4.20— ''JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 iss —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL iss —CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL I 1 t f r r l c MANUAL t t 1987 OF EDINA CHECK STER 05 -31 -8 AGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 147285 06/04/87 26.87- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 4.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 9.46 JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 81.61- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 9.06- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 8.24- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 9.46- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 9.46- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 8.72- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 1.91- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 1.03- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .46 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 2.71- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 69.88- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 5.08 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 1,343.29 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 4,079.73 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 15.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 3,494.33 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 15.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 23.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 778.82 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 5.60 JOHNSON WINE SO -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 420.88 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 760.97 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 426.48 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 778.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 17.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 426.48- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 11.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 708.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 945.20 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 21.00- JOHNSON.WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 945.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 21.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 21.00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 906.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 11.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 677.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 945.20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 3.15 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 270.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 102.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 189.72 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 3.50 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 19.60 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 869.37 JOHNSON WINE SO -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/04/87 - .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 147285 06/01/87 145.50 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL im m 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1987 CLTY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 14,442.01 05 -31 -87 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE r *• *rr 147433 06/04/87 3.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 147433 06/04/87 126.84 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 822 -82 147433 06/04/87 105.50 PAUSTIS R SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 147433 06/04/87 16.98- PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 147433 06/04/87 4.00 PAUSTIS d SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 147433 06/01/87 48.00• PAUSTIS 6 SONS INVENTORY 50 -4632- 842 -84 270.36 r itirrt 147435 06/04/87 7.55- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 842 -84 147435 06/04/87 7.12- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 862 -86 147435 06/04/87 3.36- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 147435 06/04/87 377.45 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 842 -84 147435 06/04/87 356.20 PRIOR WINE CO 50- 4628- 862 -86 715.62 r 147451 06/04/87 6.43- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 147451 06/04/87 1.85- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 147451 06/04/87 9.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 58.27- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 5.87- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 7.56- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 147451 06/04/87 28.19- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 147451 06/04/87 321.27 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 147451 06/04/87 2,913.57 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 1,409.24 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 147451 06/04/87 183.55 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 147451 06/04/87 946.75 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 586.00 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 147451 06/04/87 754.45 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 6,997.17 * 147774 06/01/87 150.00 JUDY LAUFENBURGER SUMMER REGISTRATION 10- 3500 - 000 -00 150.00 * rrr *tr 147776 06/04/87 432.30 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 842 -84 432.30 * •rrrtr 149174 06/01/87 189,000.00 1ST BANK SO PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 149174 06/01/87 189,000.00- 1ST BANK SO PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 .00 * rrr -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * *t -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 149203 06/01/87 AMOUNT 15.00 20.00 45.00 14.20 2.20 13.55 13.44 42.24 13.48 41.13 8.03 7.00 5.63 104.90 3.58 26.50 375.88 # 230,000.00 230,000.00 • 11,695.08 266.85 11,961.93 210.00 210.00 8.49 918.75 12.50 75.00 20.00 3.75- 1,079.80 1,859.00 25.00 39?7-.8" 3,986.30 3.00 - 8.21- 410.40 149.75 81.20 CHECK LSTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JUDY LAUFENBURGER 149251 06/01/87 LAUFENBURGER MEETING 149506 06/01/87 v 149506 06/01/87 .r • »iii» PARKING 149700 06/01/87 PARKING JUDY ti 153067 06/04/87 153067 06/04/87 �. 153067 06/04/87 153067 06/04/87 153067 06/04/87 e, 153067 06/04/87 153067 06/04/87 153067 06/04/87 o, 153067 06/04/87 LAUFENBURGER PARKING 153135 06/04/87 !, 153135 06/04/87 153135 06/04/87 153135 06/04/87 153135 06/05/87 AMOUNT 15.00 20.00 45.00 14.20 2.20 13.55 13.44 42.24 13.48 41.13 8.03 7.00 5.63 104.90 3.58 26.50 375.88 # 230,000.00 230,000.00 • 11,695.08 266.85 11,961.93 210.00 210.00 8.49 918.75 12.50 75.00 20.00 3.75- 1,079.80 1,859.00 25.00 39?7-.8" 3,986.30 3.00 - 8.21- 410.40 149.75 81.20 CHECK LSTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION JUDY LAUFENBURGER MEETING JUDY LAUFENBURGER MEETING JUDY LAUFENBURGER MEETING JUDY LAUFENBURGER PARKING JUDY LAUFENBURGER PARKING JUDY LAUFENBURGER SUPPLIES JUDY LAUFENBURGER MEETING JUDY LAUFENBURGER MEETING JUDY LAUFENBURGER MILEAGE JUDY LAUFENBURGER POSTAGE JUDY LAUFENBURGER POSTAGE JUDY LAUFENBURGER PARKING JUDY LAUFENBURGER SUPPLIES JUDY LAUFENBURGER PHOTO SUPPLIES JUDY LAUFENBURGER SUPPLIES JUDY LAUFENBURGER WATER DEPT EDINA HRA DUE HRA SOUTHWEST FIDELITY FICA SOUTHWEST FIDELITY MEDICARE NERMFLEX SERVICES CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI CAPITAL CITY DISTRI EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 05 -31 -E AGE 14 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 10 -4202- 140 -14 MANUAL 10- 4202 - 480 -48 MANUAL 10 -4202- 490-49 MANUAL 10 -4202- 600 -60 MANUAL 10- 4204 - 120-12 MANUAL 10 -4206- 140 -14 MANUAL 10- 4206- 160 -16 MANUAL 10 -4206- 200 -20 MANUAL 10 -4208- 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4503-133 -12 MANUAL 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 10- 4504 - 627 -62 MANUAL 10- 4504 - 646 -64 MANUAL 10- 4508- 140 -14 MANUAL 28- 4504 - 702 -70 MANUAL 40- 4504 - 800 -80 MANUAL *** -CKS 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL *** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10 -4200- 160 -16 MANUAL *** -CKS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL *** -CKS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 50- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -87 PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 1630.14 r * * * * ** * ** -CKS 153138 06/04/87 110.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 1.00- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 270.63- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 419.39- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 102.98- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 23.80- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 1.99- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 401.19- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 92.18- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-862 -86 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 5,500.01 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 13,531.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 20,969.58 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842-84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 5,148.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 1,190.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-842 -84 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 20,059.71 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 4,608.78 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 99.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153138 06/04/87 199.30 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 69,884.30 + * * * * ** *** -CKS 153190 06/04/87 279.47- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 368.62- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 38.02- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 4.19 -., ." GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 566.47- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 13,973.52 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 1,900.84 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 18,431.23 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 28,323.46 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153190 06/04/87 209.39 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL X153190 06/05/87 124.70 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842-84 MANUAL 61,706.37 + * * * * ** *r* -CKS 153285 06/04/87 72.79- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/05/87 .29- JOHNSON WINE DISCOUNT 50- 3710- 003 -00 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 2.06- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .44- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 816.98- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 23.22- "."JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .76- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 3.90- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1,147.84- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 39.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 .06/04/87 w.,_ ...._ 1.99- - JOHNSON WINE __.. _ ...._ - ....._ ..,_ ... .... ......r.... 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL 153285. 06/04/87 1,138.21- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862-86 MANUAL 1987 OF EDINA CHECK LSTER 05 -31 -1 AGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. B MESSAGE 153285 06/04/87 2.50- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 28.27- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .87- JOHNSON WINE SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 37.27- JOHNSON WINE SO- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 41.17- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .02 JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 3.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 175.18 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1,161.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 5.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 40,846.35 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 14.77- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626-822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 43.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 8.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 57,392.43 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 259.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842-84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1,958.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842-84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 5.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 2,058.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 5.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 271.95 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1,413.72 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 56,910.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 10.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862-86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1,863.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 44.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 .35 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 75.96 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 390.23 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 4.55 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 3.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 205.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 5.50- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 197.82 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 5.95 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1.63- JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 18.75- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 86.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/04/87 251.04 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 153285 06/05/87 44.26 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 153285 06/05/87 298.01 JOHNSON WINE INVENTORY 50 -4632- 862 -86 MANUAL i 82; 506 -'Y7 t 162,238.56 aaaasa ata -CKS 153435 06/04/87 2.74- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 153435 06/04/87 7.04- PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 153435 06/04/87 4.75- PRIOR WINE CO 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 153435 J 06/04/87 136.83 PRIOR WINE CO - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 50- 4628 - 822 -82 - - - MANUAL 1987,CITY OF EDINA 10 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 153435 06/04/87 270.89 PRIOR WINE CO 153435 06/04/87 237.59 PRIOR WINE CO 425.97 FUND 630.78 + TOTAL rtrtrtrtrtrt FUND 29 TOTAL 153451 06 /04/87 167.42— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 3.16— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 10.08— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 .91— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 269.64— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 212.07— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 .43— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 1.29— QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 504.18 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 8,369.44 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 13,481.33 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 10,602.84 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 90.00 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 314.40 QUALITY WINE 153451 06/04/87 42.50 QUALITY WINE ,153451 06/04/87 128.50 QUALITY WINE 32,868.19 + rtrtrtrtrtrt 153729 06/05/87 45.00 ED MACHOLDA PETTY CASH 153729 06/05/87 55.00 ED MACHOLDA STARTER CASH ' 100.00 + rtrtrtsrtrt r 639,979.60 FUND 10 TOTAL 374.96 FUND 23 TOTAL 149.94 FUND 26 TOTAL 8,721.63 FUND 27 TOTAL 425.97 FUND 28 TOTAL 113.21 FUND 29 TOTAL 1,730.95 FUND 40 TOTAL 542,680.91 545,402.05 FUND 50 TOTAL S3,833.88 FUND 60 TOTAL 1 , 2501 *32 . ! 9 TOTAL rtrt+ —CKS 1,248,011.05 MANUAL 26- 1040-000 -00 MANUAL OS -31 -87 PAGE 17 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL +rt+ —CKS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822-82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL rtrt+ —CKS 26- 1030 - 000 -00 MANUAL 26- 1040-000 -00 MANUAL GENERAL FUND ART CENTER SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND GUN RANGE FUND UTILITY FUND LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND rt+rt —CKS Hand written 76989 thru 77058 78115 thru 78133 has ��4f� CHECK Rf�if� P iii PAGES 1