The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1987-07-06_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JULY 6, 1987 7:00 P.M. JOINT HRA AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MINUTES OF JUNE 15, 1987 II. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Building Expansion - Cineplex Odeon Corporation - (Edina Theatre) - 3911 W. 50th Street (Contd from 6/15/87) III. SOUTHDALE CENTER; REPRESENTATION OF EQUITABLE, CITY OF EDINA AND EDINA HRA ADJOURNMENT OF HRA EDINA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE - Robert Bahneman PROCLAMATION - United Way Business Community Involvement I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items listed with an asterick ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the .consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of June 15, 1987 III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Lot Divisions, Plats, Appeals: Favorable rollcall vote to majority of quorum required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A. Lot Division - Lot 13, Block 1, GLEASON COURT (6505 -07 Gleason Ct) IV. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS V. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Sidewalk Improvement Nos. 5 -36 and S -38 * B. Resurfacing and Repair of Tennis Courts * C. Playground Equipment for Alden Park * D. Color Video Camera VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Fire Department.Reorganization Plan B. 1987 -88 Work Program C. Summary of 1987 Legislative Acts D. Community Services Board Appointments E. Fireman's Relief Association Statement F. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Boundary Change.Request G. Hedberg Property Status Report H. Set Date for Review of Comprehensive Plan (7/13/87 - 7 p.m.) Agenda Edina City Council — July 6, 1987 Page Two VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS A. Centennial Major Funding Project - Arneson Acres IX. FINANCE A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 7/6/87: General Fund $261,284.03, Art Center $3,641.76, Capital Fund $4,807.00, Swimming Pool Fund $10,250.79, Golf Course Fund $21,223.77, Recreation Center Fund $3,957.52 Gun Range Fund $443.58, Edinborough Park $7,876.75, Utility Fund $256,522.93, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,988.50, Construction Fund $71,786.56, Total $645,783.19. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon July 13 Special Council Meeting - Comp Plan Review 7:00 p.m. Manager Conf Rm Mon July 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL JUNE 15, 1987 A joint meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. Action was taken by the HRA and the Council individually as required. - Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Courtney. MINUTES of the H.R.A. Meeting of June 1, 1987 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Kelly, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards,.Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON AMENDMENTS TO SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN: AMENDMENTS APPROVED.. Gordon Hughes, Executive Director of the HRA, recalled that on April 6, 1987 staff provided the Council with an update on the Hedberg property. At that time the Council took action that instructed and directed staff to: 1) initiate the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the site, 2) initiate an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan to include the vacant land in southeast Edina not presently in the tax increment district, and 3) initiate studies to create a new tax increment district. Mr. Hughes said that the EIS process has commenced and that the preparation work has been done. The amendments to --he Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan have been prepared for the Council's consideration and notice was published that.this would be a public hearing to take testimony on the amendments in order to include the rest of the vacant land in that area. Mr. Hughes presented a schematic of the southeast Edina area showing the land currently within the tax increment redevelopment plan and the land that is proposed to be added. Considerable discussion followed summarized as follows. Member Kelly commented that when the Council took the action in April she had stated that she felt the Council should have a philosophic discussion as to how the proposed development of the Hedberg property would affect Edina and whether it meets the City's mission statement. Since then the Council has seen a presentation of the proposed development and now are considering an amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan which in the introduction, Section A, is very specific as to what is to happen to this piece of property. She said she felt this has preempted the discussion that she,felt the Council should have, that she could not approve the amendment because of the specific language as to how it should be developed. Member Turner suggested that this is the time for the Council to talk through the issues and to see if the objectives in the original plan are still valid for this piece of property. She then asked if the action required would simply add property to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan or if it would also include approving a financing method. Mr. Hughes explained that the action required would increase the sphere of influence of the HRA in southeast Edina. The law provides that the HRA would have to enter into redevelopment contracts covering at least 50% of the land prior to establishing a tax increment district; so the establishment of the district actually would occur if and when the City reaches an agreement with the developers. Continuing, Member Kelly pointed out that the Statement of Need says we need affordable housing for the elderly and persons of low and moderate income and that the HRA is desirous of promoting the development of housing for the elderly and other persons in the City. She said she felt that statement deserves a lot of debate; that we really have met our needs for subsidized housing for low and moderate income people. She added that the Edinborough project has not stood the test of time, that Edina has met these needs better than other communities in the metropolitan area and that she did not think this is the direction Edina should take now. She stated that she has not been convinced by the community that they want her, as a Council Member representing them, to approve another subsidized project. Member Smith commented that this is the last commercial area in Edina. He said he felt the property will be developed regardless and that the question is should the City get control over the area and is this the way to do it. Manager Rosland submitted that this 100 acres is the last remaining property in Edina of any size and scope and that the suggested process will" enable the City to get a handle on the project and develop it other than in five or six acre parcels. He said that if the .project is patterned after Edinborough there will be a subsidy for the.housing part of the project. Attorney Erickson explained that there are tools available to control development and that this is another tool but it is not available until certain steps are taken, one of which is to add the property to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. There are other steps that must be taken and which the Council and the HRA must act upon before any aid is given. That would be: 1) . creation of the tax increment district, and 2) approval of the redevelopment contract. He said those would be the difficult ones. Member Kelly reiterated that she has difficulty in agreeing to the amendment because of the Statement of Need. Member Smith asked if the multiple land use, i.e. housing, retail and office, is needed to create a tax increment district and whether the housing or the park could be left 'out. Member Richards commented that that is one alternative but that unless there is some benefit to the public the City and the HRA does not need to get involved at all in the development of.this property. In reference to tax increment financing, Member Smith asked if there are delinquent tax payments, which are financing the bonds, who suffers the detriment..of that cash flow. Member Richards commented that tax increment financing does not . increase taxes but simply captures taxes and applies them to a different mechanism by which the proceeds are used to pay off the bonds. He said you would have to looi< at the agreements to see what type of security there is for repayment of the bonds. Attorney Erickson explained that there are many sources to fund whatever development occurs in the project; there are special assessments, State Aid funds and bond funds. To the extent that bonds would be sold on a general obligation basis by the City and the money loaned to the HRA for the development, if there were a shortfall that money would have to come from an increased mill rate. How great a risk that would be depends on how the redevelopment contract is framed. Presumably, the project would be phased and for Phase I the Council and the HRA would have to decide a number of issues, i.e. how much would the first phase cost, how would that be paid for, what would be required of the developer to help create the increment to pay for those bonds, what kind of guaranties would the developer have to put up (letters of credit and securities), etc.' Mr. Erickson said that the reason it is proposed to add to the district is that the tax increments from both the regional district and-from the new district can be put into a pot to pay the bills on both projects, the old increment area and the new increment area, and hopefully, because of the Edinborough development there will be a surplus in the old area to help pay for any deficits that may occur in the new area. Member Kelly asked, if this property goes into a tax increment district, who pays for the additional services that would be needed until the bonds are paid off. Manager Rosland said that the City would pay for the services,.and that it is suggested that the redevelopment agreement would put aside certain operational funds for those services. He said that alternative ways to fund those services have been discussed with the developer and the various City departments who would provide the services. Member Richards commented that he strongly felt that the need for low and moderate income housing is there as evidenced by the Edinborough project housing being developed and sold out in two years; that there there was no subsidy for the Edinborough project but rather that it was a smart, innovative use of increased taxes to pay for the public infrastructure; and that this mechanism is working for Edina. He said that the City would never have received a public asset like Edinborough Park for the entire community that basically is being financed and paid for by that project as well as user's fees without the tax increment financing. He concluded that the Council would be remiss in not taking advantage of another great opportunity to do the same thing with the Hedberg property. Member Turner commented that she shared a little hesitancy about the Statement of Need but that she thought by amending the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan the Council is not obligating itself to any particular kind of housing at this stage of °the game. She added that the overwhelming reasons in her mind for the City being involved were: 1) the opportunity to develop the parcel as a mixed use project as a whole, 2) the opportunity to control traffic in the area, 3) the opportunity to encourage types of affordable housing to attract young people to the community, 4)-the opportunity to accomplish a park for that area as designated in the Comprehensive Plan, and 5) that the proposed plan will give the City the opportunity to do something that is more unique and meets the needs of the community in a way that would not be possible otherwise. Following the discussion, with no comment or objection being heard from the public, Commissioner Richards introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. The HRA and the Edina City Council having previously approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.421, subdivision 15, designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "), which also constitutes a redevelopment project, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 445.421, subdivision 13. It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to. the Plan, designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Amendment "), which among other things, enlarges the Plan Area. 2. The 1987 Amendment is described in the document entitled "1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan" which has been presented to this Board, and the 1987 Amendment as so described is hereby approved, and the Executive Director of the HRA and the attorney for the HRA are hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the implementation of the 1987 Amendment. Dated this 15th day of June, 1987. Attest: Mayor Executive Director Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall:. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1987 AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHEAST EDINA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Recitals. This Council and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") have previously approved a redevelopment plan and redevelopment project,.under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.411, et. se g., designated as the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan "). The HRA has approved amendments to the Plan designated as the 1987 Amendment to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan (the "1987 Amendment "), which among other things, enlarges the Plan Area, and has requested that this Council approve the 1987 Amendment. This Council held a public hearing on the 1987 Amendment on June 15, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard on the subject were given an opportunity with respect thereto. 2. Approval. The 1987 Amendment is hereby approved. 3. Findings Under the Municipal HousinR and Redevelopment-Act. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.521, it is hereby found that: (A) The land located within the 1987 Project Area, as defined in the 1987 Amendment _would not be made available for redevelopment without financial aid sought (B) The redevelopment plans for the 1987 Project Area as set forth in the 1987 Amendment will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the redevelopment of the 1987 Project Area by private enterprise; and .(c) The 198.7 Amendment conforms to the general plan for the - development of the City as a whole. Passed by the Council this 15th day of June, 1987. Attest: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes:, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Resolution adopted. There being no further business to be conducted by the HRA, motion of Commissioner Kelly was seconded by Commissioner Smith for adjournment. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried', HRA adjourned. Executive Director HRA /Council II. M E M O R A N D U M TO: HRA FROM: Gordon Hughes SUBJECT: 50TH & FRANCE PARKING RAMP EXPANSION DATE: July 2, 1987 The City Council and HRA will consider the request of Cineplex to expand the existing theater at 50th and France. In connection with this expansion, Cineplex is requesting that the HRA expand the 51st Street parking ramp by adding a third level containing 115 spaces. Cineplex proposes to pay 20% of the cost of the ramp expansion by way of special assessments with the remaining 80% to be paid by the HRA. The HRA's costs would be financed through tax increments collected from the 50th and France tax increment district. 50th and France History The 51st Street parking ramp was constructed in 1969 and financed through special assessments against the commercial district. In 1974, the tax increment district was created. In 1975, the 51st Street ramp was ex- panded as part of the overall commercial district redevelopment. At that time, the 1969 special assessment was cancelled and folded into an overall assessment against the commercial district for all of the 50th & France improvements; i.e. parking ramps, landscaping, sidewalks, utilities, et.al. The special assessment levied against the commercial district equated to 20% of all redevelopment costs. Remaining costs were financed through tax increments, state aid (gas tax) and CDBG funds. Special assessments were levied on a floor -area basis and were spread over 15 years. 51st Street Ramp Expansion The 51st Street ramp presently contains 302 parking spaces. When re- constructed in 1975, the ramp was structurally modified to accommodate a third parking level, which was to be added when needed. (The 492 Street ramp is not structurally capable of expansion.) The attached letter from Walker Parking Consultants confirms than an additional level containing 115 spaces can be constructed on the 51st Street ramp. The estimated cost is $833,000. Tax Increment Financing District The existing T.I.F. District will remain in existence until 2009 unless all district debt is paid off prior to that time. The City issued $2.2 million in bonds in 1975 to finance the commercial area redevelopment. July 2, 1987 HRA Page Two These bonds will be paid off in 1993. At present, our annual tax increment Collections exceed bond principal and interest payments over - $150,000. Although we have not examined the district's cash flow in greater detail, it is obvious that sufficient tax increments exist to accommodate the full cost of the ramp expansion if warranted. If the HRA decided to participate in the ramp expansion, it could issue additional bonds or seek a loan from the City. Due to the size of a potential bond issue, we believe that a loan from the City's working capital fund would be more appropriate. Details of such'a loan would have to be refined. Alternatives If the Council approves the Cineplex Theater expansion and the HRA approves the ramp expansion, the following alternatives are available for ramp financing: 1) Assess 100% of the ramp costs to Cineplex 2) Finance ramp costs solely through tax increment financing; i.e.,no assessments 3) Accept Cineplex's proposal to pay 20% of ramp costs by way of special assessments 4) Assess Cineplex 20% of ramp costs, and assess other businesses which have expanded since 1975 a certain percentage of ramp costs 5) Assess the entire commercial district, including Cineplex, on an equal basis for 20% of ramp costs 6) Consider different cost sharing percentages Action If the Council /HRA decides that a portion of the ramp costs should be financed through special assessments, then a date should be set for a project hearing. Any approval of the Cineplex theater expansion should be conditioned on the results of this hearing. Also, if the HRA /Council wishes to use tax increments for any portion of the ramp costs, a public hearing should be conducted to amend the district's finance plan. Both of the hearings could be held at the same time, but not sooner than August 3, in order to meet publication requirements. GH /sw Attachment November 14, 1986 Parking Consultants Mr. Craig Larsen Restoration Engineers City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street.. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Vertical Expansion Potential Southside Parking Facility (PI-A) 50th & France Area Dear Mr. Larsen: As promised, we have reviewed the drawings for the above noted parking facility and confirm that the structural system is capable of supporting one additional parking level. This will provide 115 additional spaces within 38,500 sq. ft. of floor area. It was planned that this expansion consist of post- tensioned concrete, however, it might be possible to consider at this time the use of pre- stressed concrete double tees. A preliminary 1987 estimate of the project cost is as follows: Construction Cost ` 38,500/SF x $18 /SF = $693,000 Design Testing Legal (10 %) _ $ 70,000 Contingency (10 %) _ $ 70,000 TOTAL COST = $833,000 The above total project cost results in a cost of $7,243 per added car. It is probable that this project could be constructed in a 4 to 6 month period, if started in March of 1987. One significant factor is that many of the existing parking spaces would not be available during the construction, due to the need for forming and reshoring of the structure. Please let me know if you need additional information. Sincerely yours, 1_,w OJ � William C. Arons, P.E. Senior Vice President WCA /rlm 410 Thresher Square 700 Third Street South Minneapolis, MN 55415 612 / 332 -PARK Joint HRA /Council Mtg. ii. W. Lawrence 4075 W. 51st St. July 3, 1987 City of Edina Planning Dept. 4801 -West 50th Street To Members of Edina City Council; Dear Council Members; In March of 1986, my wife and -I purchased Apt.104 in the Lanterns Condominium. After considerpble expense in cleaning and redecorating we moved in on June 17. We are very happy with our home and get special enjoyment from our porch. We face the back wall of Lund's and the ramp in question. The view is not perfect, but Lund's property is well main- tained and the grounds are pleasantly landscaped. The ramp view is not the best, but the present setup fits in well with the Lund store roof - line. I cannot believe that there is insufficient space available in the com- bined areas of the 492 St. ramp, the ramp under question and the newly constructed parking lot across France Ave. I spend a lot of time on our porch and I cannot see where the ramp is filled to capacity at all times, especially theater hours. The Cineplex Corporation has every right to expand their property, but my question is, who is paying for the ramp addition? I cannot speak for my neighbors above me, but I am sure they will not be happy with any change that will affect their view. I am unalterably opposed to any changes to the appearance of the South Ramp. The one thing in the petition that bothers me is the imposition of the 500 foot limit. I believe a project of this dimension is a neighborhood concern. The changes in traffic, the added noise and pollution affect.-, the whole area, especially from France to Halifax and from 51st to 52nd St. Were the property owners on France, and those on Grimes who have no access to 51st, and our neighbors on Halifax notified of this pro- ject? The 500 foot limit seems discriminating as it limits opinions to those of us who live on W. 51st. I regret my health problems prevent me from presenting my views in person, and I will much appreciate an answer to my concerns. I hope this letter will be read at the meeting and I thank you all for the opportunity to present my views. Sincerely yours, Joint HRA /Council Mtg. II. / i / 1 of l- 1 j� C .1 X27 � / "CD taiwt.�Vfl low 1d 17, M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: Edina Theater DATE: July 1, 1987 You will note that a condition to approval-of the theater plan was a deed restriction limiting the use of the property to a_ theater. Since the Planning Commission meeting I have discussed this condition with Tom Erickson. Mr. Erickson has suggested that the use be limited as a condition of the parking variance and not a deed restriction. This provides a more simple, straight- forward means of control for the City. I would suggest that the Council modify the recommended conditions to replace deed restriction with the condition to the parking variance. A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA MMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HE D ON MAY 27, 1987 AT 7:30 P.M. EDI CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS RESENT: Chairman Gordon Johnson, John Bailey, Del Johnson, Hele cClelland, Jane Paulus, Virginia Shaw avid Runyan , John Palmer, and Lee John n MEMBERS ABSENT: Wil 'am Lewis and Philip Sked STAFF PRESENT: Ckaig Larsen, City Planner Jac ie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTE Mr Del Johnson moved for pproval of the May 1, 1987 Commu ty Development and Planning-.._Commission Meeting Minutes. Mr. ailey seconded the motion. A11 -.were in favor. The motion c ried. II. OLD BUSINESS: 87 -3 - P � Plitt Theatres, Inc. Edina Theater 3911 West 50th Street Request: Building Expansion 93 Space Parking Variance Floor Area Variance Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that the subject request was continued to allow the proponents time to respond to the concerns of the Commission, 50th and France Merchants, Heritage Preservation Board, and staff. The theater has returned with new plans in support of their request. Mr. Larsen outlined the revised plan as follows: 1) The revised plan maintains the street front appearance as it is today. The existing 3 stores are preserved at their existing size and location. 2) The revised plans maintain the proposal for 1,400 seats, but increase the number of screens from three to four. Two of the screens would have 419 seats, and two would have 281 seats. Each pair of screens would have a concession area. 3) Since the number-of seats proposed remains the same, the requested parking.space variance remains at 93..spaces. The proposal to add a level to the south ramp continues. The additional level would provide 115 spaces. 4) The revised plans propose to remove paint from portions of the building to be saved. The plans also propose brick to match the brick in the tower for new portions of the building. The existing marquee would be preserved. These changes conform to recommendations of the Heritage Preservation Board. 5) The revised plans illustrate the theaters in a stacked configuration. This design results in an increase of 12 feet in building height. The present proposal is a four story 48 foot high building. The building would be 16 feet taller than the existing building. 6) The Zoning Ordinance allows a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) of 1.5 in the PC -2 zone. The initial proposal complied with this limitation. The revised proposal increases the FAR to 1.82, of which 1.68 is the theater. The proponents contend that this FAR is required if they are to save the retail spaces and still meet their design objectives. Mr. Larsen concluded the revised plans represent a significant improvement over the initial plan. The retail spaces are saved and the exterior treatment conforms to the recommendation of the Heritage Preservation Board. At four stories this will be the tallest commercial building on the corner. The four story portion of the building will be setback 36 feet from 50th Street which will reduce the impact at street Level. Normally staff would not support a proposal which exceeds the permitted FAR limits. The theater is, however, a unique use. Its intensity correlates more to the number of seats than to FAR. Staff could support this variance if the use of the property is limited to the theater. Staff recommends the following conditions to the approval. 1. A deed restriction limiting the theater portion of the property to theater use only. 2. HRA authorization of the addition to the ramp. 3. Removal of paint by a method approved by staff. 4. The granting of a permit by the City Council to occupy air rights above our sidewalk easement. 5. Provision for trash storage within the building. The proponents, Peter Kofman, Erika Engel were present representing the proponent. Members of the 50th and France Merchants Association were also present. Mr. Larsen pointed out the Heritage Preservation Board reviewed and approved the revised plan at their May 26, 1987 meeting. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the proposed addition to the parking ramp would be the same height as the proposed expansion to the theater. Mr. Larsen said he was unsure of the height of the ramp after completed but indicated he felt the ramp height would be less than the theater. Mr. Peter Kofman, representing Cineplex Oedeon briefed the commission on the revised plan. He pointed out changes were implemented as a result of working with City Staff and implementing the recommendations made by the Planning Commission, Heritage Preservation Board and the 50th and France Avenue Merchants Association. Mr. Kofman pointed out the retention of the store fronts. He also noted the proposal.to remove the painted portions of the building restoring it to its original facade. He added the new portions will be constructed with the same brick found in the tower. Continuing,Mr. Kofman said seating capacity will remain the same. Mr. Kofman explained his company is in favor of staff's recommendations excluding the deed restriction. Mr. Larsen said staff feels strongly about the deed restriction and requested the Commission to recommend it as one of the conditions to approval. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked if the 2nd level theater's would be handicap accessible. Mr. Kofman said they would be accessible by means of an elevator. Mr. Bailey inquired about emergency exits. Mr. Kofman pointed out an exit stairwell would be located in the rear for exiting. Mr. Lee Johnson asked Mr. Larsen, his reason for recommending a deed restriction. Mr. Larsen replied a deed restriction is used as a review mechanism. This mechanism enables staff to review potential uses and exercise control if ownership changes hands. With the deed restriction any use other than theater use would be illegal. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked Mr. Larsen about the change in the FAR Mr. Larsen responded the increase in the FAR is related to the retention of the retail spaces. Mr. Hosman Brown, representing the 50th and France Avenue Merchants told the Commission he has been in the area for 38 years. He thanked the proponents for maintaining the retail spaces but expressed some concern at the size of the building as a result of this. Mr. Brown pointed out a large single use carries a risk if it does not work out. Mr. Brown contended the 50th and France Avenue Merchants do not object to this plan but want to make sure it has been well thought out and will be economically feasible. Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend approval subject to staff conditions and noting the increase in the FAR is a result of Staff and Commission's request. Mr. Del Johnson seconded the ..motion. All were.in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 27, 1987 P -87 -3 Plitt Theaters, Inc. Edina theater 3911 West 50th Street Request: Building Expansion 93 Space Parking Variance Floor Area Variance You will recall that the subject request was continued to allow the proponents time to respond to the concerns of the Commission, 50th and France Merchants, Heritage Preservation Board, and staff. The theater has returned with new plans in support of their request. The new plans offer significant changes. Retail Spaces The revised plan maintains the street front appearance as it is today. The existing 3 stores are preserved at their existing size and location. Screens and Seating The revised plans maintain the proposal for 1,400 seats, but increase the number of screens from three to four. Two of the screens would have 419 seats, and two would have 281 seats. Each pair of screens would have a concession area. Parking Since the number of seats proposed remains the same, the requested parking space variance remains at 93 spaces. The proposal to add a level to the south ramp continues. The additional level would provide 115 spaces. The revised plans propose to remove paint from portions of the building to be saved. The plans also propose brick to match the brick in the tower for new portions of the building. The existing marquee would be preserved. These changes conform to- recommendations of the Heritage Preservation Board. Building Height The revised plans illustrate the theaters in a stacked configuration. This design results in an increase of 12 feet in building height. The present proposal is.a four story 48 foot high building. The building would be 16 feet taller than the existing building. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The Zoning Ordinance allows a FAR of 1.5 in the PC -2 zone. The initial proposal complied with this limitation. The revised proposal increases the FAR to 1.82, of which 1.68 is the theater. The proponents contend that this FAR is required if they are to save the retail spaces and still meet their design objectives. Recommendation The revised plans represent a significant improvement over the initial plan. The retail spaces are saved and the exterior treatment conforms to the recommendation of the Heritage Preservation Board. At four story's this will be the tallest commercial building on the corner. The four story portion of the building will be setback 36 feet from 50th Street which will reduce the impact at street level. Normally staff would not support a proposal which exceeds the permitted FAR limits. The theater is, however, a unique use. Its intensity correlates more to the number of seats than to FAR. Staff could support this variance if the use of the property is limited to the theater. Staff recommends the following conditions to the approval. 1. A deed restriction limiting the theater portion of the property to theater use only. 2. HRA authorization of the addition to the ramp. 3. Removal of paint by a method approved by staff. 4. The granting of a permit by the City Council to occupy air rights above our sidewalk easement. 5. Provision for trash storage within the building. KOFMAN SENGINEERING ERVICES LIMITED May 19, 1987 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Final Development Plan Approval Edina Theatre, Edina, Minneapolis Project 86 -140 A /PM.DEV. Planning Index '10' Dear Sir, In response to the Public Meeting held on April 29, 1987, at the Edina Community Development and Planning Commission concerning this project, we have been working diligently to arrive at a design solution that addresses the concerns of the Planning Commission and the Businessmen's Association to keep the three existing stores that are presently contained within the subject property as part of our future development. Attached please find revised site plans, floor plans and proposed front and side elevation plans that show a revised design that can accommodate both the concerns of the Edina Planning Commission in terms of keeping the three existing stores as part of the proposed structure and Cineplex Odeon Corporation goals and objectives to provide the Edina community with a first class theatre facility. As shown on the attached, the proposed plans keep the existing number of seats at 1400 as originally proposed, however, to accommodate the inclusion of the three stores as part of our structure, while having regard for life safety issues, the theatre redesign necessitates that two theatres be created upstairs and two downstairs, this totals four theatres. To achieve a design that accommodates both the City's concerns and Cineplex' design objectives, the revised proposal - exceeds slightly the permitted floor area ratio of 1.5 for the subject property by.the City of Edina Zoning Ordinance. The theatre use itself will occupy approximately 1.68 F.A.R,.23,840 sq. ft. With the inclusion of the retail component .../2 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 2 - Mr. Craig Larsen May 19, 1987 City of Edina 1.82 F.A.R. is achieved, yielding a building size of 25,840 sq. ft. The building height will be four storeys in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed design also accommodates the concerns of the City of Edina Heritage Preservation Board. In accordance with Heritage Board concerns we propose to retain the shops on West 50th Street and remove paint and restore the appearance.of the building. As discussed previously, the objective of the proposed redesign is to accommodate City of Edina concerns as related to maintaining the existing commercial structure of the area and, therefore, we respectfully request that an administrative variance be granted to accommodate the increase in floor area ratio that results from keeping the existing stores as part of the theatre structure. I thank you for your patience in allowing us some additional time to arrive at this design solution and hope for a favourable response to our revised proposal. Yours truly, KOFMAN ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED Erika Engel, MES., MCIP, Senior Planner C.C. Peter Kofman /KESL David Mesbur /DKMA Perry Stevens /KESL Afsaneh Asayesh /DKMA Harold Sand /Planner, City of Edina Heritage Preservation Board Encls. EE /sc 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 1>, r .e di - - ff i _ -} STORAGE IEIlEVJ up RETAIL SPACE Q jp i EMIT u a j THEATRE 2 419 SEATS I I I B v •�# EiIT ' 111 MAIN FLOOR PLAN 113: I'-o" i THEATRE 1 281 SEATS Y�.ly ESC w o rn LOBBY icKEET - BOOTH P I 1 up —i__.. `r RETAIL SPACE RUIEC, ND DMx+rvG W REVISIONS NOTES 1 SEATS - M61N FL00R • 100 SECOND FLOOR • 100 TOT4 1400 SEATS E Lor COVER.OL 100 t - S 20MMa PCD 6 WLDE10 ME10HT - FRONT EEISTIMO B6CN . M -O• S PROPOSED EAR' _ ElICL1AING RETA.• 1 b 12Sy60Sl. INCLUUN0 RETYL• 182127,66061 'a I B KOFMAN ENGNEE L& LM SERVICES ITED UM NQAE STREET TOROMQ CNTARID MAT ZM (6181323-11386 David K. Mesbur Architect Ltd. =R,1b Ss<EN.r r W1Ew MIMaEaso FwoECI nRT CINEPLEX ODEON THEATRES EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. -MAIN FLOOR PLAN wuE I/8•• I-0• a„ MAY 14 i oR.H,ln GBW o<acoa. Pro.rtcr uo oR.Nma Ho 86140 A2 l' 1 1 a MEZZANINE FLOOR PLAN REVISIONS art auu-s KOFMAN = \QN(E SWEET TORONM CNTPAC M4T 79 4V m-t4 Arvid Ltd. a Architect Ltd. ow m= eeu�.. «dam woxc, inr CINEPLEX ODEON THEATRES EDINA CINEMAS ' MINNEAPOLIS, MINN MEZZ. FLOOR PLAN suu 1/8 -- 1' -0- nrt MAY 14 X87 -a, G8W _c,,,., �cl� G � 86140 A3 J, SECOND FLOOR PLAN REVISIONS IE.�E R��uES A�D E KOFMAN EWAKRD"E� ES LFIffED 000 NIONDF STREET TCFKWM ONTARIO ANT 2m (46) 020.04 Devil K. Mesbv ATeNteet Ltd. Nel ]tsalD YR aN R CY DrEE CINEPLEX ODEON THEATRES EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN SECOND FLOOR PLAN s LE 1 /6" • 1'-0, ooE MAY 14 137 on.... ar uac.EOe. X86140 wr�A4 D� SIDE ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION I I t I i I I I I REAR ELEVATION REVISIONS KOFMAN ESENOWKETGRCTED OWNUN13ESTFEET TCFCNMONTAFIC) MOM OMM K. Mesbtr Archftct Ltd. IENaimD CINER-EX ODEON THEATRES EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOUS, MINN EM4WM0 ELEVATIONS scuE 1/0% f - e — MAY 14 187 — GBW I 86140 P5 i fJ 1J SECTION AA 1/8"• f- 6" SECTION BB va °• j_p• R c1w Ou•WWGrq REVISIONS wre rcu•w�s •wEU[o KOFMAN EW,NE ENGNE ES LERMG RQfED 13M VCN3E STREET TOROMR CNTARD ANT Zre (416)323-13Ba David K. Mea. An�litect Ltd. mo >�eem.E «elas>m ROJf CT "ILE CINEPLEX ODEON THEATRES EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. SECTIONS 2LLE 1/8,• 1'-0, w1E MAY 14 187 wa•++e. GBW —.ID. waEC+.o wavmc No 86140 A6 P -87 -3 Request: Plitt Theatres, Inc. Edina-Theater 3911 West 50th Street Building Expansion 93 Space Parking Variance Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Cineplex Odeon Corporation has submitted a request to allow the reconstruction of a major portion of the Edina Theater. The purpose of this reconstruction would be to increase seating capacity from its present 841 seats to 1400- seats. The theater would continue to have 3 screens. Mr. Larsen pointed out the theater property has approximately 87 feet of frontage on West 50th Street. This frontage includes 3 shops and the existing theater lobby. The expansion of the theater would remove the existing shops and convert the entire frontage into a lobby area for the theater. The new lobby would be accomplished by remodeling the interior space of the existing shops. The facade of the building, including the tower and marquee, would remain. Mr. Larsen added reconstruction would begin approximately 36 feet back from the front property line. The addition would provide for 3 auditoriums oriented east to west. Seating in the individual auditoriums would be 371, 359, and 670 respectively. All three auditoriums.would contain a balcony level. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said decorative concrete block would be used for the new portion of the building. Existing portions of the building would be repainted and some reglazing would occur. Mr. Larsen explained the Edina Theater originally contained 970 seats. In 1976 the theater converted to two screens, which reduced seating capacity to 643 seats. In 1980 a third screen was added and seating was increased to its present 841 seats. Mr. Larsen added the theater is located within the 50th and France Tax Increment District. Parking for the theater is provided in the public ramps. The Zoning Ordinance allows for the re -use or reconstruction of existing buildings in the district without providing additional off - street parking.. The Ordinance provides, however, that expansions to existing uses must include additional off - street parking in conformance with Ordinance requirements. The Ordinance requires 1 space for each three seats plus one space per employee for theaters. The proposed expansion would add 559 seats. Assuming no new employees are added the expansion would require 186 new parking spaces. The Zoning Ordinance provides that for certain complementary night time uses the required parking can be reduced by 50% if adequate parking to meet the total demand is available within 500.feet.of the building. Theaters are specifically listed as an eligible night time use. As a result additional parking demand can be reduced to 93 spaces. Mr. Larsen told the Commission the theater has no way of providing parking to meet the additional demand created by the expansion. Consequently, they are requesting that an additional level be added to the 51st Street public ramp to satisfy the additional parking demand. The addition to the ramp would provide 115 new parking spaces. Mr. Larsen pointed out the original 50th and France Plan assigned additional development potential to specific properties within the district. Those properties paid additional assessments for parking and other public improvements based on the assigned expansion potential. The additional parking demand created by these expansions would be satisfied by the addition of a level to the 51st Street ramp. Some of the anticipated expansions have occurred. However, two major planned additions have not occurred. First, the Arby's site was expected to redevelop with 15,000 square feet of retail space and 15,000 square feet of office space. Second, the undeveloped area immediately north of 51st Street ramp and immediately west of the theater was expected to develop with approximately 6,000 square feet of retail and 6,000 square feet of office space. The theater was not included in the properties with expansion potential. Mr. Larsen continued that in 1978 our expansion policy for the district was reviewed and revised. As a result of that review a policy was adopted which allowed building expansions up to a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.0 to use existing public parking. Expansions between 1.0 and 1.5 (maximum allowed in the PC -2 district) were allowed only if additional parking demand were satisfied privately. The theater was expanded to an FAR of 1.0 in 1980. A 66 space parking quantity variance as granted to allow the expansion. The theater has submitted a parking and traffi "c analysis in support of their proposed - expansion. The report concludes that the theater use is complementary night time use which does not conflict with the day time retail uses in the district. The report does find, however, that during peak day time periods (12:00 - 3:00 p.m.) that the parking "ramp is essentially full. Study findings show the impact of the theater on this condition to be minor. The additional 115 spaces "will alleviate that parking deficiency and will increase retail activity," according to the report. The original public improvements at 50th and France were financed by a combination of tax increment bonds and special assessments. Eighty percent of the cost was funded by tax increments, twenty percent by special assessment. The theater has proposed that the addition to the ramp be financed in the same manner. However, instead of all property owners receiving a share of the special assessment, the theater would pick -up the entire 20 percent. Other property owners would incur no additional cost. Staff has conducted a very preliminary review of the tax.increment status. It appears that the district could finance the cost. Mr. Larsen indicated staff has no doubt that the proposed theater would be a first class facility. We also agree that for the most part theater patrons will not be competing with retail patrons for parking. The exception could be matinee showings during peak shopping periods. We are not comfortable, however, in recommending approval without a thorough discussion of the following issue areas. The issues areas were summarized by Mr. Larsen as follows: Impact on the Character of the Area. 50th and France is a very fragile area. The mix, variety, and size of the uses is critical to its continued success. Will a single use of the magnitude proposed change the character of the area? What will the loss of 3 store fronts on 50th Street mean to the character of the area? Could the plan be altered to save some or all of these stores? Parking The proposal is contrary to the original plan and also to the expansion policy of 1978. The additional parking demand would be provided in the public ramp and not privately. What do we say to other property owners who wish to expand up to a FAR of 1.5 and use public parking. The additional 115 spaces on the 51st Street ramp represent all of the planned additional parking. Need The Barton - Aschman parking study indicates a maximum attendance during the study period of 465 persons. This is only slightly over 50% of the theater's current capacity. Is the study a typical representation of theater attendance? If so, why increase the capacity by 559 seats? Other Trash storage at 50th and France is provided at several locations on City property. The receptacle used by the theater and others is at capacity. The theater should provide trash storage within its building if this expansion is approved. The City has an easement for sidewalk purposes over a small area of the southeasterly portion of the theater property. The proposal would maintain the existing sidewalk but would encroach into the easement at the second story level. We are currently investigating the advisability of this encroachment. Mr. Larsen concluded that Representatives of the theater's owners recently,held a meeting to explain their plans to the 50th and France Merchants Association. Staff expects a written response from the association prior to the Commissions' meeting. Mr. Peter Kofman and Erika Engle, representing the proponent Cineplex Odeon Corporation were present, Mr. Paul Pink , architect, and Mr. Dave Koske, Barton - Aschman. Mr. Kofman began his - presentation by informing Commission Members of the plan and design of the proposed facility. He said Cineplex Odeon acquired the facility in 1982 from Plitt Theatres and since then has upgraded all theatre holdings. The plan for this site is to upgrade the facility creating a first class motion picture facility and retain the Art Deco motif. The building marquee will be retained. Mr. Kofman added that motivating patrons to use the facility is their goal. Mr. Kofman said he understands and shares the concerns of City Staff and residents regarding the stressed parking situation during regular business hours and told the Commission they would petition the HRA and apply the tax increment method of paying -for the business portion of 20% of the ramp cost. Mr. Kofman pointed out this expansion will result in the loss of retail tenants and Cineplex Odeon Corporation will provide relocation assistance. Mr. Kofman concluded,the building will conform to all zoning requirements. Mr. Hosmar Brown, member of the 50th and France Organization, apologized for the failure to give the Commission response to this proposal. Mr. Brown added this group is made up of very busy individuals and they were unable to meet together as a group until yesterday morning. Time did not enable them to develop a presentation. Mr. Brown said he is in general agreement with staff. He expressed interest and delight with the concept of an improved theater facility but expressed concern over the possible loss of three unique businesses. Mr. Brown agreed that theater use is generally during non - business time and stated the proponent's offer to pay for the 20% portion of the ramp is great. Continuing, Mr. Brown said there are concerns and reservations regarding the loss of the retail stores. He pointed out 50th and France is very densely used and the main use is retail. The concern businesses have is with a possible current trend to develop use by other than retail. He pointed out this trend has created a parking problem at the 49 -1/2 Street ramp. He said the loss of the unique shops as a result of this proposal hurts. He would like to see the 3 shopowners protected. Mr. Brown suggested that the proponent look at the possibility of redesigning the facility to create room for these three businesses and added he is very much in favor of the concept of upgrading the facility but want the proponents to look at redesigning the facility so the businesses would not be lost. Mrs. McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if it was possible to put another level on the 49 -1/2 Street ramp. Mr. Larsen pointed out there is a user at this site that stresses the parking. No feasibility study has been done on decking. Mrs. McClelland said in her opinion this proposal should be reconsidered allowing the proponent time to review the plans and consider the issues brought up by staff and the 50th and France Organization. Mr. Larsen said the HRA mechanisms can be dealt with at the Council level. He added the Heritage Preservation Board has commented on the proposal and the proponent plans to respond to their comments. Mr. Larsen said in his opinion the central issue is the proposed loss of the three shops. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked the proponent about attendance and if he believes attendance will increase as a result of this proposal. Mr. Kofman said the theater renovation is being undertaken to respond to the requirements of the industry in placing first run movies in a motion picture facility and meeting the needs of the public. He added in order to get first run movies which would entice the public the theater must meet industry requirements. Mr. Kofman said if these requirements are met attendance would increase. Mr. Runyan wondered why they need three theaters. Mr. Kofman explained the first solution considered was 6 theaters. This would enable the theater to play different films thus reaching the larger viewer need. Continuing, Mr. Kofman said in speaking with the Businessmen's Association they found the proposal of 6 theatres would have a negative impact on the area. Mr. Kofman explained the reason for multiple theatres numbering 6 or 3 is to produce a feeder system which screens a first run movie in the largest auditorium and as attendance decreases the movie is fed into the smaller auditoriums. This works well for the exhibitor as well as the distributor which is why there is a need is for multiple theaters. Mr. Kofman pointed out that upgrading this facility will allow the theater to compete with the growing trend of placing motion picture facilities into larger shopping malls. He added that an upgraded facility will benefit the area. Mr. Gordon Johnson asked Mr. Brown if there were other locations on 50th where these merchants could relocate. Mr..Brown replied that at this time there were none. Mr. Gordon Johnson moved to continue P -87 -3 until the May 27, 1987 meeting, allowing the Heritage Preservation further review of the proposal and receipt of a written response from the 50th and France Association. Mrs. McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 29, 1987 P -87 -3 Plitt Theatres, Inc. Edina Theater 3911 West 50th Street Request: Building Expansion 93 Space Parking Variance Cineplex Odeon Corporation has submitted a request to allow the reconstruction of a major portion of the Edina Theater. The purpose of this reconstruction would be to increase seating capacity from its present 841 seats to 1400 seats. The theater would continue to have 3 screens. The theater property has approximately 87 feet of frontage on West 50th Street. This frontage includes 3 shops and the existing theater lobby. The expansion of the theater would remove the existing shops.and convert the entire frontage into a lobby area for the theater. The new lobby would be accomplished by remodeling the interior space of the existing shops. The facade of the building, including the tower and marque, would remain. Reconstruction would begin approximately 36 feet back from the front property line. The addition would provide for 3 auditoriums oriented east to west. Seating in the individual auditoriums would be 371, 359, and 670 respectively. All three auditoriums would contain a balcony level. Decorative concrete block would be used for the new portion of the building. Existing portions of the building would be repainted and some reglazing would occur. The Edina Theater originally contained 970 seats. In 1976 the theater converted to two screens, which reduced seating capacity to 643 seats. In 1980 a third screen was added and seating was increased to its present 841 seats. The theater is located within the 50th and France Tax ,. Increment District. Parking for the theater is provided in the public ramps. The Zoning Ordinance allows for the reuse or reconstruction of existing buildings in the district without providing additional off - street parking. The Ordinance provides, however, that expansions to existing uses must include additional off - street parking in conformance with Ordinance requirements. The Ordinance requires 1 space for each three seats plus one space per employee for theaters. The proposed expansion would add:559 seats. Assuming no new employees are added th_e expansion would require 186 new parking spaces. The Zoning Ordinance provides that for certain complementary night time uses the required parking can be reduced by 50o if adequate parking to meet the total demand is available within 500 feet of the building. Theaters are specifically listed as an- eligible night time use. As a result additional parking demand can be reduced to 93 spaces. The theater has no way of providing parking to meet the additional demand created by the expansion. Consequently, they are requesting that an additional level be added to the 51st Street public ramp to satisfy the additional parking demand. The addition to the ramp would provide 115 new parking spaces. The original 50th and France Plan assigned additional development potential to specific properties within the district. Those properties paid additional assessments for parking and other public improvements based on the assigned expansion potential. The additional parking demand created by these expansions would be satisfied by the addition of a level to the 51st Street ramp. Some of the anticipated expansions have occurred, however, two major planned additions have not occurred. First, the Arby's site was expected to redevelop with 15,000 square feet of retail space and 15,000 square feet of office space. Second, the undeveloped area immediately north of 51st Street ramp and immediately west of the theater was expected to develop within approximately 6,000 square feet of.retail and 6,000 square feet of office. The theater was not included in the properties with expansion potential. In 1978 our expansion policy for the district was reviewed and revised (see attached memorandum). As a result of that review a policy was adopted which allowed building expansions up to a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.0 to use existing public parking. Expansions between 1.0 and 1.5 (maximum allowed in the PC -2 district) were allowed only if additional parking demand were satisfied privately. The .theater was expanded to an FAR of 1.0 in 1980. A 66 space parking quantity variance as granted to allow the expansion. The theater has submitted a parking and traffic analysis in support of their proposed expansion. The report concludes that the theater use is complementary night time use which does not - conflict with the day time retail uses in the district. The A report does find, however, that duri (12:00 - 3:00 p.m.) that the parking findings show that the impact of the be minor. The additional 115 spaces deficiency and will increased retail report. ng peak day time periods is. essentially full. Study theater on this condition to "will alleviate that parking activity," according to the The original public improvements at 50th and France were financial by a combination of tax increment bonds and special assessments. Eighty percent of the cost was funded by tax increments, twenty percent by special assessment. The theater has proposed that the addition to the ramp be financed in the same manner. However, instead of all property owners receiving a share of the special assessment, the theater would pick -up the entire 20 percent. Other property owners would incur no additional cost. Staff has conducted a very preliminary review of the tax increment status., It appears that the district could finance the cost. Recommendation' Staff has not doubt that the proposed theater would be a first class facility. We also agree that for the most part that theater patrons will not be competing with retail patrons for parking. The exception could be matinee showings during peak shopping periods. We are not comfortable, however, in recommending approval without 'a thorough discussion of the following issue areas. Impact on the Character of the Area. 50th and France is a very fragile area. The mix, variety, and size of the uses is critical to its continued success. Will a single use of the magnitude proposed change the character of the area? What will the loss of 3 store fronts on 50th Street mean to the character of the area? Could the plan be altered to save some or all of these stores? Parking The proposal is contrary to the original plan and also to the expansion policy of 1978. The additional parking .demand would be provided in the public ramp and not privately. What do we say to other property owners who wish to expand up to a FAR of 1.5 and use public parking. The additional 115 spaces on the 51st Street ramp represent all of the planned additional parking. Need The Barton - Aschman parking study indicates a maximum attendance during the study period of 465 persons. This is only slightly over 500 of the theater's current capacity. Is the study a typical representation of theater attendance? If so, why increase the capacity by 559 seats? Other Trash storage at 50th and France is provided at several locations on City property. The receptacle used by the theater and others is at capacity. The theater should provide trash storage within its building if this expansion is approved. The City has an easement for sidewalk purposes over a small area of the southeasterly portion of the theater property. The proposal would maintain the existing sidewalk but would encroach into the easement at the second story level. We are currently investigating the advisability of this encroachment. Representatives of the theater's owners recently held a meeting to explain their plans to the 50th and France Merchants Association. Staff expects a written response from the association prior to the Commissions meeting. TO: Craig Larsen, City Planner FROM: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer 0-17, SUBEJCT: Theater Expansion - 50th & France After reviewing.the Edina Plitt Theaters Parking Study, the only concern -I would have is the compatibility of the parking use. The traffic impacts on the street system are not significant. A serious review of the original 50th & France Commercial Area Plan is advisable. Given the success that most retailors are experiencing, parking needs are becoming more acute. As you know, the ramps have only one expansion capability. That expansion would be to add one level to the south ramp. The additional level in the south ramp was to be tied to expansion of the space located immediately north of the south ramp. Observations at other locations in the metro area indicate some fairly significant afternoon use of parking (i.e. Theaters around the Burnsville Center I It would be .important to ascertain whether the Business Association feels that the theater expansion is compatible to the area. It is important that the area not return to conditions that preceded the 50th & France Area Improvements. FJH:lmb 4/23/87 M E M O R A N D U M T0: Craig Larsen, City Planner FROM: Harold Sand, Planner SUBJECT: Edina Theatre Proposal from Cineplex Odeon Co. The Edina Heritage Preservation Board met April 28, 1987 and reviewed the Edina Theatre proposal and history of the property. The Board has previously gone on record supporting the preservation of the Art Deco shops, theatre entrance, tower, .marquee and canopy because it is the last example of this design idiom in Edina. The board also supported a sign variance in 1981 to allow the reconstruction of the non - conforming marquee after it was destroyed by a tornado. The rationale for this support was the historic and architectural significance of the building and marquee and it's importance as a community landmark. A condition of this variance was the cooperation of the owner with preservation efforts for the property. ..The Heritage Preservation Board expressed concern that the letter from Kaufman Engineering Company indicated they have met with the Board when in fact no such meeting has taken place and the proponents have not made any presentation of the proposal. The Board also adopted the position that the City requests that the architect look at retaining the shops on West 50th Street, return to the original architecture of the shop fronts, remove paint and signage to restore the appearance of the building as it was designed and to conform to the 50th and France Design Framework adopted in 1974. The Board requested an opportunity to review the original architectural plans and the proposed building plans in the design development or contract document phase before a building permit is issued. The Board recommended that the exterior material used on the new auditorium be brick rather than decorative concrete block shown on the plans. KO i A V SERVICES ENGINEERING LIMITED April 8, 1987 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Final Development-Plan Approval Edina Theatre, Edina, Mn. Project #86 -140 A /PM.DEV. Planning Index 110' Dear Sir, Kofman Engineering Services Limited is the appointed agent for Plitt Theaters Inc., the Owners of the Edina Theatre. On behalf-of our client, we are hereby applying to the City of Edina for final development plan approval for the upgrading and renovation of the Edina Theatre. In support of our application enclosed herewith please find the following: A completed application form for final development plan approval and the required application fee of $200. - A description of the proposed renovation and its components as it relates to: the City of Edina's Zoning Ordinance; 50th and France Commercial Area Plan; Parking and Traffic Issues and the Cineplex Odeon Corporation mandate, goals and objectives. Site plan, floor plan and proposed front and side elevation plans. The Edina Theatre parking study, prepared by Barton Aschman Associates Inc, parking and traffic consultants. It is our objective that the Edina theatre enhance the Edina commercial area and serve as a cultural focal point for the community. Consequently, through the design and planning of the proposed upgrading of the theatre, it has been our philosophy to seek the participation of the Edina Businessmen's Association and Property Owner's Association. A meeting has been held on April 1, 1987 with these groups to introduce the Edina Theatre redevelopment project, .../2 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 - 2 - Mr. Craig Larsen April 8, 1987 City of Edina to hear the community's comments and, where possible, incorporate these comments in the planning and design process. As previously discussed, we would appreciate the inclusion of this project on the April 29, 1987 Planning Committee Agenda for the consideration of the City of Edina Planning Committee. The help and assistance you provided in the planning process to date has been greatly appreciated. If you have any questions or comments concerning the above or the enclosed, please do not hesitate to call me. Yours truly, KOFMAN ENGINEERING SERVICES LIMITED u., C%V - Erika Engel, MES, MCIP, Senior Planner C.C. Peter Kofman Peter Mandell Paul Pink Maurice Evans David Mesbur Perry Stevens Boz Posilovic EE /sc 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 q A ENGINEERING �� ✓ N SERVICES LIMITED EDINA THEATRE PROPOSED RENOVATION AND ITS COMPONENTS CINEPLEX ODEON CORPORATION MANDATE, GOALS AND OBJECTTVFS Cineplex Odeon Corporation purchased Plitt Theatres in 1985, and has been upgrading all Plitt theatres since that date: (See attached Annual Report) Our mandate is to upgrade the Edina Theatre into a first class motion picture facility. The Corporation's goal is to provide our patrons with the ultimate in theatre going satisfaction, appealing to their visual senses with harmonizing colours, stimulating them with new design, and providing the latest and best in projection and sound. Accordingly, the features of the new Edina Theatre upgraded facility include, spacious lobbies, Dolby and THX sound systems, marble floors and the finest in motion picture presentation, all done in an art deco motif. It is our objective that the Edina Theatre complex serve as a cultural focal point for the community, where movies can be watched and the public can relax in clean, comfortable and plush surroundings. Our idea is to motivate the patrons sense of association with their home surroundings by giving them a motion picture experience in a first class facility that has been proportioned and engineered so that each theatre viewing room, no matter what its size, is acoustically and geometrically correct. By providing this level of service to the movie patrons, we will be able to provide the Edina movie going public with a new, clean, first class motion picture operation it deserves. CONFORMITY OF PROPOSAL TO PUBLIC POLICY FRAMEWORK In achieving the above -noted Corporate goals and objectives local zoning regulations, design guidelines and building codes are-respected, addressed and incorporated into the planning and design to the greatest extent possible. CITY OF EDINA ZONING ORDINANCE - LAND USE The subject lands are zoned PCD (Planned Commercial District) where a theatre is a permitted use without limitation as to the number of seats. .../2 1303 YONGE STREET. TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 - 2 - The proposal is in conformity with the permitted 1.5 floor area ratio for the site. The proposed floor area is approximately 21,400 sq. ft., as the lot area is approximately 14,280 sq. ft. In terms of building height, the front of the property along the street will remain in its present form. The addition of one storey will take place in the back but will not be visible from the street line. The addition will start approximately 35 ft. from the street line, and a building height of approximately 3 storeys will be achieved. The permitted building height by the zoning ordinances is 4 storeys. The proposed theatre renovation will not result in a significant intensification in land use, as the proposal maintains the existing three screens, however, the theatres are reoriented for better viewing and a balcony floor is created. In terms of seating the new theatre will accommodate approximately 1,400 seats. Presently the theatre accommodates approximately 841 seats. DESIGN In developing our design for the theatre, we had regard for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority design framework for building renovation. Accordingly, our design aim is to achieve: - preservation and enhancement of the village atmosphere of the streetscape; - individual expression in building and design; - harmony and continuity betweeen the streetscape, the building and the signing system; - the scale of the building to be in character with the area; in terms of exterior design, the use of warm, soft materials; earthy materials and the use of warm tones and colours. These were achieved through the following design characteristics of the proposed theatre. To increase public safety and reduce congestion resulting from line -ups along the street, we propose to enlarge the existing lobby area by incorporating the existing three stores on the main floor, as part of the lobby. However, to preserve and enhance the village atmosphere of the streetscape, we propose to retain the storefront .../3 1303 YONGE STREET. TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 - 3 - windows of the existing retail operations and perhaps use these windows as display windows for the theatre and other businesses within the Edina commercial area. In terms of harmony and co- ordination of materials .` used it is proposed to maintain all the brickwork, to paint the brick uniformly to an off -white colour. We propose to create an art deco ticket booth to blend in with the design. SIGNAGE Meetings have been held with the the Edina Heritage Board who feel that the existing marquee should be retained because it has been a point of identification for the Edina community and has some value in terms of the heritage and history of Edina. We agree with this position and we are proposing to retain this very attractive marquee as part of the renovated theatre. PARKING Barton Aschman Associates Inc. a local traffic and parking consulting firm, has been retained to prepare a parking and traffic study. (See attached study) Our objectives in commissioning this study were to: To determine the actual impact of the Edina Theatre parking on the capacity of the 50th and France muncipal parking system during peak activity periods. To project parking space demand for a proposed expansion of the Edina Theatre. To determine if the Edina Theatre expansion characteristics meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance 8.7.5.C, that allows a 50o reduction in parking provision for night time use. To determine the actual peak number of parking spaces used by the Edina Theatre patrons in the 50th and France municipal parking ramps by time of day. To determine the actual parking occupancy of the 50th and France parking ramp during the Edina Theatre performances. To determine the impact of the traffic generation on the 50th system during a week -day peak 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 Edina Theatre and France street p.m. rush hour. .../4 (416) 323 -1384 - 4 - The study found the current parking situation during regular business hours stressed, however, the theatre does not significantly contribute to the parking problem. The 50th and France peak retail service sector parking occupancy occurs from 12.00 noon to 3.00 p.m. The peak theatre parking demand occupancy is between 7.30 p.m. and 9.30 p.m. During the day only approximately 10% of the mid -day parkers are theatre patrons. Since the theatre parking requirements are at minimum during peak mid -day shopper parking and at maximum in the evening hours when the municipal parking ramps have substantial vacancy, the theatre patron parking is a highly compatible shared parking use of the Edina municipal ramp. Consequently, the study found that the Edina Theatre expansion meets the criteria of the Edina Zoning Ordinance 8.7.5C and qualifies for a 50% reduction of required parking spaces. Since the Edina Zoning Ordinance parking requirements are 1 space for 3 seats for theatres, an increase of approximately 550 seats would mean that 183 additional parking spaces may be required. However, in view of the conformity of the proposed theatre with the criteria for 50% reduction of parking requirements as stated in the Zoning Ordinance, 93 new parking spaces would be required. The 50th and France muncipal parking ramp located behind the Edina Theatre has the capacity for a 100 space addition. It is proposed that the parking requirement for the Edina Theatre be satisfied by an addition to the muncipal parking ramp. Since the Barton Aschman study showed that the municipal parking ramp during mid -day peak periods appears to be virtually full to most shoppers and that the theatre use does not significantly contribute to the parking occupancy during mid -day, the addition of 100 spaces to the municipal parking ramp will help mitigate the existing parking concerns in the area. As both the theatre use and the Edina retail area will benefit from the proposed addition to the municipal parking ramp by 100 spaces,.it seems appropriate that the tax increment method of financing that is available to the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority apply to the cost of building the ramp addition. It is our understanding that in the past the tax increment method of financing has been applied such that 80% of the total construction costs of the ramp are funded through general obligation bonds, issued by the City of Edina, for a period of 15 years at an interest .../5 1303 YONGE STREET. TORONTO. ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 - (416) 323 -1384 - 5 - rate of approximately 6.9 % -7% and 20% of the costs are levied as a special levy assessment to the business community. Cineplex Odeon Corporation proposes to assume the businessmen's portion, 20% cost of construction of the ramp through the payment of special levy assessment, as provided for by the tax increment method of financing. It is our understanding from Craig Larsen, Director of Planning, that the City of Edina HRA has the financial means presently to fund the City of Edina portion of the costs for the construction of the ramp, through the tax increment method of financing. It is anticipated that the tax increment yielded from the upgraded and renovated Edina Theatre will provide further financial help to the HRA with the construction cost of the ramp. SUMMARY 1. We anticipate that the Edina Theatre expansion will have a positive impact on the 50th Street and France Avenue commercial district, since it will increase night time activity in the area while providing rationale for additional parking to serve the retail sector of the Edina business area. Recent experience throughout North America shows that most retail areas and shopping malls seek a theatre use as part of their shopping complex or commercial area because of the increased patronage that the area receives as a result of the theatre drawing ability. The philosophy is, - yesterday's movie patrons can be to- morrow's shoppers, - a theatre increases the profile of the area, as more people visit it. 2. The proposed theatre conforms to the provisions of the City of Edina Zoning Ordinance and other applicable City Ordinances. 3. The proposed theatre will not be detrimental to the properties surrounding the track and will, in its physical design, help preserve and enhance the Edina commercial area streetscape. 4. In terms of intensification of land use, the proposed increase in floor area ratio will not exceed the permitted 1.5 by the zoning ordinance, and there will not be an increase in the number of screens. Therefore, it is our opinion that the proposed renovation will not result in an "overly intensive land use ", as defined in the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 M;= 5. The Edina parking and traffic study undertaken by Barton Aschman shows that the parking needs of the theatre and the retail shopping area is a highly compatible shared parking use and the theatre.will not result in undue traffic congestion and traffic hazards. In view of above and the discussion in the previous pages, we trust that the evaluation of the proposal will make all the findings necessary to approve the upgrading and renovation of the Edina Theatre. 1303 YONGE STREET, TORONTO, ONTARIO M4T 2Y9 (416) 323 -1384 DETAIL mo scALE) PROPERrr Lim -DECORATIVE TRIO popgRTI LIRIE-L, J>D ho,o it 7v IdIN .1 i_ al p `4. Z. 50TH ST a =.N.M%�Z. litRt BDUTKXE It ALE EDINA THEATRE COmmy BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC AND U)CATIoN SUPVEY FOR: MR MARVIN MANN AND CIINEMALAND INC. 7z f ? Litt- YO A.—OT-.. 3z o W . .. ..... .... . ;z DETAIL mo scALE) PROPERrr Lim -DECORATIVE TRIO popgRTI LIRIE-L, J>D ho,o it 7v IdIN .1 i_ al p `4. Z. 50TH ST a =.N.M%�Z. litRt BDUTKXE It ALE EDINA THEATRE COmmy Ac Litt- YO A.—OT-.. o W Mt. 1. _lli�7. I — =V ;R —I . - ;z MIN Ac ;z A F Ld _ —]610 - I A o LL fSU 7ND? E_ A r REVISIONS OVF R.NIwS w.wl --- ,'•F- �TS'r�T -rr� `-T :.I Sri 15.73 — r _50.73 r---------------- - - - - -- s.W 1 - - i II EXISTING 1 01 W I KOFMAN ERC++EERNG SEfNCE -q LMITED �J 13BA - - - - - - -- / ��- ----- - - - - - _ — — - r David K. MesbLw — r7o.00 — • � Architect Ltd. - rarvir r>Iw N�1Itilap ..�YCr irr.l CINEPLEX ODEON FRANCE AVE. EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS. MINN. SITE PLAN Imo• Itl -C SITE PLAN SwIE I• • 10, - O• O+rr WI10N 50, I-- d, D11M�lr P. P. --f"., V1OT wq[C�NJ DMwq.p 86 -140 AI E*111 —c" REVISIONS Ts KOFMANES'EWNICEESR WLFATED QM NKPACE STRM7 TCFKNM WARD ANT TM 4416)323.084 DOM K. Mosbtw Architect Ltd. MB aano I'N'E' P'LEX ODEON EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1/8, • 1, - Cr do APR. 9. 1997 4r U v TJ V 0 0 0 d., Gael up up Up LIP 9030 090 c 0 li L wwouM'! n orneE THEATRE 3 THEATRE F5 27 2 THEATRE I W-1 4.1 Lom u• -13 L MAIN FL" PLM NEW ExIeTIN E*111 —c" REVISIONS Ts KOFMANES'EWNICEESR WLFATED QM NKPACE STRM7 TCFKNM WARD ANT TM 4416)323.084 DOM K. Mosbtw Architect Ltd. MB aano I'N'E' P'LEX ODEON EDINA CINEMAS MINNEAPOLIS, MINN. MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1/8, • 1, - Cr do APR. 9. 1997 86-140 A 2 1 Y BALCONY LEVEL PLAN r , MpSC,.O M..w.01n REVISIONS nrt —S •wwaan KOFMAN° Ma �� (M)32,.UB. David K. Ard�iEect Ltd. Ltd. mac—. CNEPLEX ODEON EDNA CINEMAS LOW- APOLIS,N MINN. BALDDNY LEVEL PLAN uuw,n o�aeoe. woEC+.o owwMo 86 -140 A 3 PROJECTION BOOTH LEVEL PLAN I 1 REVISKINS KOFMAN S UM VCNGE STREET ,UFKNM CNTAFK) M4T 7,9 1493K 7 -om Oe,AdK. Ltdr Architect Ltd. u.ow�e rn ew CPEPLIX OCEON EDINA CINEMAS MME4POU% MW �...4 PROJECTION BOOTH LEVEL PLAN mwun. waioe. 86 -140 A 4 FIIONT ELEVATION I=W%kl ,I REAR,L_ MEM4TM KOFNILk 5i M ~� +oa w hLVn lJ V Bart. µmpg F) ta•JM'4 -:7 tW01041 Nk mall yAr. encu _ trm," -Mv C[KT, ptR/(_ r,QMNTLD SIDE ELEVATION. CaSf 6Lt�. Tb ee RllgMD - mott*rNo GONG, sew VIII rcoFnn�ry u.,® F„ M ... __ rnp or 0 •o I I d iJ •O •O b �fNuewY k� V a -Aw unL SECTION A —A KOFMAN �� e ra m � -- 50th & FRANCE BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box 24122 Edina, Minnesota 55424 May 22, 1987 Community Development and Planning Commission City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Sirs and Mesdames: We are setting forth in this letter the substance of our comments and position made to you at the April hearing on the remodelling and reconstruction of the Theatre at 50th and France. This letter is furnished in accordance with your request that evening. 1. We do approve and support, in principle, the renovation and update of the Theatre, including the construction of the additional level on the south parking lot. We greatly appreciate the petitioner's offer to pay 20% of the cost instead of assessing that percentage against the commercial area. 2. We are concerned with the beginning of any trend away from retail to service - oriented businesses in the 50th and France area. It is the large collection of small, unique, privately -owned shops that helps give "the Corner" its distinctive charm and attraction. We have just reviewed, the second set of proposed plans and are gratified to see the retail area has been saved. 3. We recognize the benefit of increased parking from the added level on the south ramp, but we also call to your attention the existing stressed condition of parking on the north side of 50th, especially in the lot on the north side of 491 Street. We strongly urge that this problem be addressed at the same time as the extra level is being added on the south ramp. 4. The market survey done by the Theatre in 1986 indicated the maximum theatre attendance during this survey period was approximately 50% of capacity. We raised the question at the hearing that, considering that survey,increasing capacity from 800+ to 1,400 seemed unwarranted. We recognize there may be special factors influencing this industry of which we are unaware, but to our mind the necessity of increased capacity has not been explained or justified. 5. Finally, we raised the issue of the size of the building being out of character with the rest of the area. The new plans have magnified this issue. (a) The building will be 48 ft. high, and that height will extend for the full east -west direction of the lot. That represents approximately a 4 -story building. We had thought 2 stories was the recommended limit. No other building in the business area is over 2 stories. Physically, Community Development and Planning Commission Page Two May 22, 1987 it will loom over and dwarf the surrounding buildings. (b) The EAR ratio is shown as 1.82, though we had understood the maximum in this area was 1.5. (c) The size and floor area could create one other problem: If the increased capacity is not needed, then there exists the situation of a very specialized single - purpose building being under - utilized. Inevitably that will lead to a remodelling and change in use, albeit an expensive change. The revised use and remodelled structure is likely to require much more daytime parking than-a theatre use, with consequent heavy strain on the area's parking facilities. There are enclosed several copies of a recent article about Cineplex Odeon Theatres which may be of interest and furnish background to you about the industry. HAB:w cc: City Planner cc: Edina Theatre Very truly yours, 50th & FRANCE BUSINESS & ,PROFESSI AL ASSOCIATION By a� ]U1 7T 6 36 .02] � 1.x•5' -1 2.414 By LJNDA SAN-DI�R I lt's time tot a sneak preview of Cine- plex Odeon stock, soon to be released based in the U.S. The issue looks expensive aY• but it measures. money managers the - could appeal to fans of fancy Cineplex at.ers. ling In just over a year. the once-5 North Canadian company boor -by America's major six U.Smovice axis. Now it plans bling ter chains• to raise its profile— and comme shares on Wall Street by �g common the New York Stock Within a week or sled Merrill sell U-S invesa Allen & Co. are expected won Cineplex tors as many cards: Garth shares. Among the drawing DrabinskY. Cineplex's energetic chairman. and MCA, its deep pocketed U.S. sponsor. After the offering. MCA will retain 450Ic of Cineplex's 50 million shares. Cineplex's U.S. price will reflect its trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange, where it closed yesterday at 20v That's about $15 in U.S. currency, Putting the company's market value at $750 million. For simplicity, dollar amounu and share prices sume at follow Canadian d in ollar esequals 75 U-S. `r F zh 19 tf 191. J 17 1s Yi Aa0■D!1' 0h 1aS T , YT 6 ao ■6 Btninew The& ehsin Year ended Dee. 31,198& gevea■e: $375.5 > won. 67 Beata or Net lnoome: S23.7. a Shan 'Fie*t TWW, Much 31.1987: Per+l►ue 16 Banta va 11 centa• Average daily trading volume: 40.080 char" t nil 50.2 million cotamtm sham on tad. N�}ea alb U-S. Offering Bad Other in c.aedian donnas: Neu: Storl rasa] t, in U.S. dousm tlaaaoal shares at current Prices. While 1957 box office receipts are ahead this Will of last year S. it's too sooi�� 111 I aria be a bumper. Year, says tential hits are lyst Martin Romm- Some Po in the pipeline but the release of "Rambo III" has been postponed until 1958, he says. Harold Kramer, Cineplex's chief finan- cial officer, says the company ys Teducing ndence on HollYµ•�•�� Film Pro, cents. At $13, the stock would trade at 33 times Cineplex's pro forma 1986 earning? of 45 cents a share. General Cinema, a big the- ater operator and bottler, trades at 20 threes 1986 earnings- MCA bought Cineplex shares in 1986 at the equivalent of 71=i; Mr- h abinsky recently bought more shares at about 13. say Cineplex's 1957 Canadian analysts per share profit could > sometimes But such projections ation: ' says Har- menu of analysts' inagtn et Manage - n' Eisen of Integrated Au when hit ment. Movie e money manager movies are plentiful. 1 of hit movies is unpre- syys, but the Supply dic'able. value seekers want. in Mr. is says effect. to buy an exhibitor's screens, at close to their "private market value: In 1g88, Cineplex bought screens for ia aver- age of 5276,000 each, says a Canadian ana- lyst. But buyers.of Cineplex � f each of pay the equivalent Of:;S�• its 1.490 sueens• maturing. adds �ep�� executive. Theater atten former while screens are mul • dancer �g Im Corp. sold its th Wig` le of back for such aters a coup.. Yew p SOUL: Cineplex is the major "puie play and h 00 on movie theaters, Investors mllltiscreen N been a pioneer in building 0-0 theater complexes• is X00 Cineplex stock could boom if 1987 loo bumper movie year. says a West Coast 00o vector. After high fixed costs are cove 00o be says, incremental revenue " woulld be siza 0-00 extra fanny in the seat' ex in 000 money manager sold Cinepl 1�ngpand distribution "Will be signit� cant" to the company in the future. With MCA, Cineplex also plans a film studio toter in Orlando. Fla- ion worries Cineplex's headlong expansion has some people. Since 19S4, re grown more than sevenfold, using Pi0 forma numbers. Long -term debt Of rL57 _ million exceeds sharebolders eq tY million, despite MCA's 1956 in rh's of million. Off .balance sheet add $497 million to its obligations- The actions L'.S. offering and other transactions mil will boos; shareholders a ,&y by doesn't lion. Mr. Kramer says• wing so east, necessarily yin to keep gTO but to be very profitable, he adds. Cineplex's performance is hard to as' 1986.30c, of pre-tax income came ' �a of . unwanted theaters. Some p ale . think me . company is overpaying t 0 . �, %rich it must pay' to maintain even if revenue collapses. Cur , May. Cineplex. s expanding business Ion - a sumes its cash flow. Cineplex's acquisitions were mostly at prices before production compa- ti_ bargai► theater chains. In No- e- hies started buying • about $125.000 Per Tay. ember 1985 it paid screen for Plitt Theatres.s ., mlu�n per • New York City. paid Warner ys screen last fall for RKO Century ed Theatres and will pay almost S3 million a screen for Walter Reade Organization - " Manhattan is very important for us," a Kramer sa}-s. Cineplex will lure New in- Mr. Kram cassette re- red. Yorkers and others from N�deo od clean that corders. be says, by providing t; ble. theaters and P°PCO1 with real butter, its 1986 hallmarks- "We think people are going to �t9ie rofiti ho wever. and a�1. en9► love it, ,' he says. at a fat p THE WALL STREET JOURNAL L 100 Shi 900 Shs 500 Sha 1000 Sha Ou ell no as crncago 1 / lamas 1$ti( t / wame / Aooress City - Bur � 1 I1 Chicag THURSDAY. MAY 7, 1987 51 i 1 1 1 �l i i f f i EDM PUTT 'FATE% PARKIM SIUDY 50th Street and Frame Avenue South Edina, Minnesota Ccnducted Friday, December 19, 1986 and Sa Y, Apr 20, 1986 Prepared For: Cineplex Odeon Corporation (Plitt North Central Theatres, Inc.) Prepared By: Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. March 1987 Introduction Study Objective Conclusions Recamendations Edina Theater Patron Parking Analysis Edina Theater Expansion - Parking Demand Analysis Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX Edina Theater Patron Survey Edina Municipal Parking Ramp Occupancy Survey Page 1 3 4 7 8 12 16 20 23 ter' Pact 1. Business District, 50th and France Avenue South 2 Edina, Minnesota 2.. 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes 17 3.. Edina Theater Traffic Impact Analysis 18 . 1. Municipal Parking Ramp O=ipancy Survey December 19, 1986 (APpendix B) 24 2. Municipal Parking Ramp Occupancy Survey December 20, 1986 (Appendix B) 25 3. Statistical Tabulation of Plitt Theater Parking Study 9 3 u EDM P= == PAFZK M SIYJDY IDMMUXTIM The Cineplex Odeon Corporation has proposed expansion of the Edina Plitt Theater to a total of approximately 1,400 seats from 841 existing seats. Since the },heater expansion may generate increased Parking demand within the 50th Street and France Avenue commercial district and specifically in the two City of Edina municipal parking ramps located on 49 1/2 Street and on 51st Street (Figure 1), Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. was retained to examine the parking impacts of the proposal. This study will establish the existing theater parking demand and municipal ram parking P P g occupancy baseline for development of the expanded theater 1 ° p a ' ° •pOo � � v i °..Y y. EYv 6 COI 2��1�+F"��? Qi� OS aS�i� C C' �,E 3�'G � 9ri . F ��.°. � ,? �< ®° .. �D �� 4 � WS �• p��e e'Z a y 1 _ f Barton -Aschman 50th and France-Ave Busin;e'ss -District.- S. Edina; Minnesota Figure 1' I To determine the actual peak number of parking spaces used by Edina Plitt Theater patrons in the 50th and France municipal parking ramps by time of day. To determine the actual parking occupancy, of the 50th and France municipal parking ramps during Edina Plitt Theater performances. To determine the actual impact of Edina Theater parking on the capacity of the 50th and France municipal parking system during peak activity periods. To project Parking space demand for a proposed expansion of the Edina Plitt Theater. To determine if the Edina Plitt Theater expamion characteristics meet the requirements of Zoning Ordinance 8 -7.5.0 to allow 50 percent reduction of parking provision. To determine the impact of Edina Plitt Theater traffic generation on the 50th and France street system during a weekday peak P.M. rush hour. 3 I i r r r t r i i Peak Activity Levels The data gathered in this study on December 19 and 20, 1986, represents peak Shopper and theater attendance activity levels. The 50th and France peak retail and service sector parking occ- upancy occurs from 12:00 noon to 3:00 P.M. Peak occupancies measured during this period were 83 percent and 87 percent. While the capacity of the municipal ramps was never exceeded, 83 percent and 87 percent occupancy appears "full.,, The Perception of a "full" condition discourages customer activity at the 50th and France center. - =If . 0 . The peak theater parking demand occurs during evening performances at 7:30 P.M. and 9:30 P.M. when up to 85 percent of the total parkers in the municipal ramps are theater patrons. Only 10 percent of the midday packers are theater patrons. 4 r � , r 1 PiurLicipal Rmp Shared Parking 1 The parking demand for the 50th and France retailing activities and the Edina Theater performances occur at different times of the day. Theater r Parking requirements are at a minimum during peak midday shopper parking and at a maximum in the evening hours when the municipal ramps have substantial vacancy. The theater patron parking is a highly compatible shared parking.. use of the Edina municipal ramps. I Peak theater parking occurs during the later evening performances when approximately one parking space per six theater seats is utilized by theater patrons. At that peak rate, approximately 93 additional parking spaces would be utilized with expansion to 1,400 seats. There is currently sufficient vacant space in the municipal parking ramps to accommodate the proposed Edina Theater expansion parking in the evening hours. LMatinee theater patrons utilize approximately one space per seventeen theater seats. At that rate, 33 additional parking spaces would be utilized L by theater patrons with expansion to 1,400 seats during he g c , ommercial district peak parking period. :If the peak matinee attendance figures �- reported po for November 28 and 29, 1986, are used, approximately 70 additional parking spaces would be utilized by theater patrons during midday. The Edina Theater expansion meets the criteria of Edina Zoning Ordinance f8 -7.5.0 and qualifies for a 50 percent reduction of required parking spaces. ( Therefore, 93 new spaces would be required. red. The addition of 100 new parking spaces to the existing 50th and France' municipal parking system will be more than adequate to serve the Theater expansion. Currently, the municipal parking ramps are basically full during the peak midday period. This perceived parking deficiency discourages retail customers from coming to the area. The addition of 100 new parking spaces will alleviate that parking deficiency and will stimulate increased retail activity. LEdina Plitt Theater Traffic Gene atim lTraffic generated by the Edina Plitt Theater currently has no significant impact on weekday P.M. peak hour traffic operations and capacity on the 50th LStreet and France Avenue street system. Traffic generated by the expanded Edina Plitt Theater, since it is primarily generated after the peak hour of 4:30 to 5:30 P.M., will also not have significant impact on the 50th and France street system traffic operations and capacity. R Edina Parking Reg i z- ments The Edina Theater expansion meets the criteria of Edina Zoning Ordinance f8 -7.5.0 and qualifies for a 50 percent reduction of required parking spaces. ( Therefore, 93 new spaces would be required. red. The addition of 100 new parking spaces to the existing 50th and France' municipal parking system will be more than adequate to serve the Theater expansion. Currently, the municipal parking ramps are basically full during the peak midday period. This perceived parking deficiency discourages retail customers from coming to the area. The addition of 100 new parking spaces will alleviate that parking deficiency and will stimulate increased retail activity. LEdina Plitt Theater Traffic Gene atim lTraffic generated by the Edina Plitt Theater currently has no significant impact on weekday P.M. peak hour traffic operations and capacity on the 50th LStreet and France Avenue street system. Traffic generated by the expanded Edina Plitt Theater, since it is primarily generated after the peak hour of 4:30 to 5:30 P.M., will also not have significant impact on the 50th and France street system traffic operations and capacity. R n r Construct 100 new parking spaces on the existing 50th and France municipal Parking ramps system to serve the Edina Plitt Theater expansion as well as the existing retail parking deficiency. Shared parking allows efficient use of municipal parking space. The -50th and France retail district utilizes parking during the day and the Edina Theater utilizes that same parking at night. It is, therefore, recommended that the required parking for Edina Theater expansion be reduced by 50 percent. The Edina Theater expansion will have a positive impact on activity levels in the 50th Street and France Avenue commercial district since it will increase night -time activity while providing a rationale for providing increased parking to serve retail. 7 1r� L The statistical tabulation of the Edina Theater parking occupancy count and patron survey conducted on Friday, December 19, 1986, and Saturday, December 20, 1986, is illustrated in Table 3. An analysis of the statistical results' is as follows: Patronage information for the 50th Street and France Avenue South Plitt Theaters was furnished by Mr. Arthur D. Murtha, Plitt District Supervisor, for the dates the survey was conducted plus other representative dates throughout 1986 (5/22 - 26/86, 7/2 -6/86, 8/28- 9/3/86 and 11/25- 30/86). Patronage at evening performances from 5:00 to 9 :30 P.M. is generally 50 to 75 percent higher than that recorded when matinee performances are held (generally on holidays, Saturdays and Sundays). In comparing the patronage on the dates the survey was conducted to the supplemental patronage information furnished by Mr. Murtha, it appears that this count and survey did cover a peak patronage period in the year. The exception to that was the matinee performances held on Friday and Saturday, November 28 and 29, 1986, when the shows were for a younger audience. 8 f...- P wmrrr MrrYy wwwl "---I - % *Ramp occupancy figures are on average counts taken between one-half hour after last show for a given set of showings. "Parking Space Inventory - Ramp 81 (contract) 80 spaces (public) 220 spaces Total 300 spaces Ramp 02 (public) 275 spaces Total (Ramps 1 i 2) 575 spaces OBerton- Aschman Assoclates, Inc. ,.r � 1 Table 3 Statistical Tabulation 50th Street of Plitt and France Theater Parking Study Avenue South M Primary Edina Municipal Ramp A Perked Purpose 0ccu>Qnnc y_Surver Theater Attendance People/ In Ramps Thenter Total Cars Parked' X OccuQ ed'• % Total Parking % Occtpfed by Day, Date L Time Adult Children 0 Drivers Vehicle s % 0 % Rammp 1 R;n) 2 Ramp 1 Ramp 2 by Theater Drivers Theater Drivers ►rl•12/19/86 5:00 61 20 22 3.7 17 77 22 100 147 192 67 70 5 4 Fri- 12/19/86 7 :15 313 48 118 3.1 100 100 116 98 117 83 53 30 50 21 Fri - 12/19/86 9:30 345 22 123 3.0 107 87 119 97 103 33 47 12 79 23 Sat•12/20/86 12:30 121 36 51 3.1 47 92 41 80 183 240 83 8T 11 10 Sat•12/20/86 2:45 104 56 39 4.1 37 95 34 87 181 232 82 84 9 8 Set - 12/20/86 5:00 204 63 83 3.2 65 78 81 98 131 120 60 44 43 14 Sat•12 /20/86 7 :15 430 35 150 3.1 116 78 1S0 100 112 64 51 23 66 24 Sat•12/20/86 9 :30 397 29 161 2.6 134 84 156 97 107 50 49 18 85 28 *Ramp occupancy figures are on average counts taken between one-half hour after last show for a given set of showings. "Parking Space Inventory - Ramp 81 (contract) 80 spaces (public) 220 spaces Total 300 spaces Ramp 02 (public) 275 spaces Total (Ramps 1 i 2) 575 spaces OBerton- Aschman Assoclates, Inc. ,.r � 1 1 i 'Uieater Patron Mode of Travel 1 The theater patron interview results indicate that the people per vehicle ratio averages about three persons per car with a vehicle occupancy high recorded at the Friday, 5:00 P.M. performance of 3.7 persons per car and at the Saturday 2:45 P.M. performance of 4.1 persons per car. It was assumed that all le came y ' PAP by private vehicle and only those persons who indicated they were drivers were interviewed. Meater Patrons Use of the Edina Municipal Parking Ramps Approximately 77 to 86 percent of the theater patrons at Friday y and Saturday evening performances from 5:00 P.M. to 9:30 P.M. parked in the Edina Municipal Parking Ramps. That parking percentage is 92 and 95 percent from 12:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. on Saturday. Miscellaneous parking outside of the municipal ramps is available during the evening hours at the 50th and France shopping center. Lpater Patron Primary p L Virtually 100 percent of the theater Patrons attending Friday and Saturday Levenly Performances from 5:00 P.M. to 9 :30 P.M. came to the 50th Street and France Avenue center for the primary purpose of attending the theater. The interviews at matinee performances on Saturday from 12:00 to 3:00 P.M. that 80 to 87 percent of the theater patrons came to 50th Street and France Avenue area with the primary purpose to attend the theater. 10 Edina Mmicipal Parking POW fancy The peak occupancy of the Edina municipal parking ramps occurred on Saturday between the hours of 12:00 noon to 3:00 P.M. when the two parking ramps were 83 to 87 percent occupied, That parking °icy rechiced ' to 70 percent and 60 percent on Friday and Saturday evenings respectively by 5:00 P.M. These Occupancy percentages include theater patrons. Parking Pez� Of POOP Use by Mieater The theater patron interviews and the parking occupancy observations conducted on Friday evening (December 19, 1986) and Saturday afternoon and evening (December 20, 1986) indicates that up to 85 percent of the parkers in the evening hours are theater patrons, whereas only an average of 10 percent of the parkers during the peak icy periods between 12:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. on a Saturday are theater patrons. If the matinee attendance figures for Friday, November 28, 1986, and Saturday, November 29, 1986, are considered that percentage could increase to approximately 20 percent during the peak parking occupancy period. It is assumed, however, that high attendance matinee performances are rare and that they would be children oriented where higher vehicle occupancy ratios are experienced. Theater parkers occupied only 8 percent of the Edina municipal ramps total capacity during the peak parking period, 12:00 P.M. (Noon) to 3:00 P.M. on Saturday, December 20, 1986. 11 ( T'IIR EXPANSICN- PARKING EEMAND ANALYSIS Barton- A'schman conducted a shared parking study for the Urban Land Institute in 1983 to determine how parking is actually utilized y tilized in mixed use centers. The study illustrates that parking demand varies by time of day for different types of activities and that retail parking is particularly suitable for shared parking use, This Edina Plitt Theater study clearly indicates that theater parking demand peaks at a time when other businesses in the area have very low parking demand. The Edina Theater parking is a highly compatible shared use with the parking of the 50th and France commercial district. LEstimated Peak Parking Demand for a Proposed Oleater Expansion Edina Plitt Theater ea p k parking occurs during the later 9:30 P.M. performances when 134 theater patrons parked. The Edina Theater currently has 841 seats. Therefore, the actual peak parking rate for the Edina L?heater duringthis study period is approximately one parking space per six Itheater seats. 12 If the theater is expanded to 1,400 seats, it appears that a total of 93 additional spaces could be utilized by theater patrons during + ng peak evening performances. At the observed parking rate of one parking per six theater seats, a peak evening performance could generate a demand for 233 parking spaces. Since there are currently 393 parking spaces vacant in the municipal ramps by 7 :15 P.M., additional parking spaces would not have to be Provided for the theater evening peak parking demand. Edina Theater matinee Parking utilized on Saturday, December 20, 1987, was 47 spaces. This space utilization results in a parking ratio of approximately one parking space per seventeen theater seats (the existing Edina Theater has 841 seats) . If the theater is expanded to 1,400 seats, approximately 35 parking spaces could be utilized during matinee Performances. The matinee attendance reported for November 28 and 29, 1986 could result an Ladditional 70 parking spaces being utilized by theater patrons during matinee performances. LThe Edina Zoning Ordinance requires one parking space per three theater seats plus one space per employee. New parking is required for expansion only. Section 8 -7.5.0 provides for a 50 percent space reduction for night -time use provided that: 13 r A. The total number of spaces normally required red for night -time uses are i provided within the parking area in combination with parking spaces +'+ provided for daytime uses. EN amion Qualification The Edina Theater primarily functions at night and is the primary' user of 50th and France municipal parking during evening hours. Daytime theater parking is also provided in the municipal ramps. B. The total number of parking spaces normally required for nighttime use conforms to all requirements as to location and control as provided by Paragraph C.1._ Expansion Qualification The Edina Theater parking provided in the 50th and France municipal ramps meets all location and control requirements. C. In the opinion of the Planner, the peak hours of operation of nighttime use will not coincide with the eak hours urs of other uses sharing the Ljoint parking facility so as to cause a parking shortage. 14 Expansion Qualification The Barton - Aschman study conducted December 19 and 20, 1986, clearly establishes the fact that the Edina Plitt Theater is the Primary user of 50th and France municipal Parking ramps during the evening hours when substantial vacancy occurs. I The proposed Edina Plitt Theater expansion to 1,400 seats meets all I- requirements of Zoning Ordinance 8 -7.5.0 to qualify for 50 percent reduction in total parking requirements. Therefore, the theater expansion parking I required by ordinance of 186 parking spaces (559 new seats divided by one lspace Per three seats) can be reduced to 93 spaces. Based on actual theater parking utilization for matinee and evening performances and City of Edina night -time 50 percent parking requirement reduction, installation of 100 new parking spaces on the existing municipal Lramp system will be more than adequate to serve the Edina Theater expansion. The additional Parking space will also be extremely valuable to the retail district in providing customer parking. potential customers may now avoid �- with the impression that the parking ramps are full. L 15 7 I. TRAFF Ic impAcr ANALYSIS Street System Peak Traffic F3plIr Peak traffic volumes basicall Y occur o + n the 50th Street and France Avenue South street system from 4:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. on a weekday. Figure 2 represents 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes recorded on the Edina street system in the vicinity of the 50th Street and France Avenue South business district. It was assumed that the P.M. peak traffic hour is 10 percent of the average ' daily traffic volume. The peak hour traffic volumes for 50th Street and ! France Avenue South are illustrated on Fiqure 3. Edina Theater Traffic Generation The Edina Plitt Theaters peak Patronage a hours do not coincide with the peak J weekday P.M. street traffic hour. This study indicates that the theater t_ attracted only 22 vehicular trips on Friday, December 19, 1986, during the Lpeak traffic hour, 4:30 P.M. to 5:30 P.M. It was assumed the Edina theater Lpatrons are drawn equally from north and south on France Avenue and east and west on 50th Street. The Edina Theater oriented traffic during the P.M. I Weekr3ay Peak traffic hour is represented in Fi u� 3. 16 q ._'__ +� 69.300 ° R •1 Y ;+ " C - � ( •moo_.— - • r o i 1 , + • J:� — �� StiE 1•`ow6 ]7C) �a•O.wOD:r --.�^ Nil • o � �� 755 � I {j� � ! m ��Qj r s �.. � �i 1� c •vC �' `rsi 4,950 t GCw 4,950 s vae6'� a SC: m cl ' ° c•sco _ Nom__ -_� /�•-- �' =� __ _ _ ; ••h• rte •_1- •vr ° •4i(♦ •v( — `b.• • —� • rj — _a��'— '. P.l ti_ � —_ _ �—•- -� O' fl> •hrs nt � —_ — - -_ • e.•5 a.; O.p �O �° _ � of � _ 13.900 � ` ��• —: '•jJ,�•O_y poi' q O _ �•.t• ., raa%ct [• he - _ N 5,9=;, — 7 Iii ': �•. .,.�� I� Lt 1(-- - -=��- z 11.E _ •- A • ��iD �I� _ •vt .for., I�• •r[ I % J •. .�V [ J` [ n -25 770 rr\ i •000•v Irk 'r • Ct �O •A - -- hrr I a • it _ a 9.807 - s, g 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Barton -Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 2 T f r s i q ._'__ +� 69.300 ° R •1 Y ;+ " C - � ( •moo_.— - • r o i 1 , + • J:� — �� StiE 1•`ow6 ]7C) �a•O.wOD:r --.�^ Nil • o � �� 755 � I {j� � ! m ��Qj r s �.. � �i 1� c •vC �' `rsi 4,950 t GCw 4,950 s vae6'� a SC: m cl ' ° c•sco _ Nom__ -_� /�•-- �' =� __ _ _ ; ••h• rte •_1- •vr ° •4i(♦ •v( — `b.• • —� • rj — _a��'— '. P.l ti_ � —_ _ �—•- -� O' fl> •hrs nt � —_ — - -_ • e.•5 a.; O.p �O �° _ � of � _ 13.900 � ` ��• —: '•jJ,�•O_y poi' q O _ �•.t• ., raa%ct [• he - _ N 5,9=;, — 7 Iii ': �•. .,.�� I� Lt 1(-- - -=��- z 11.E _ •- A • ��iD �I� _ •vt .for., I�• •r[ I % J •. .�V [ J` [ n -25 770 rr\ i •000•v Irk 'r • Ct �O •A - -- hrr I a • it _ a 9.807 - s, g 1985 Average Daily Traffic Volumes Barton -Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 2 I I ; � 1• I SHELL I I Q IST EOINA BANK 1 . . - 1 :. ® . ._... _. ... _ .....(._.... POSE OFFICE HALIFAX AVENUE '- = _, •; _ -___ °' GI ANCrS HOOT I--- - DOCTOR'S BLDG' ZE • J 1 n / rrl i F.DINA FIVE 0 '-- - 11� _j C►! (n r . ,. LuNOS -I I Edina Cn 1 1 Edina Municipal o II %;- - - - - -- - -_J Municipal .... I I I WIN AL ' Parkin g ....... �.� Parking Ramp = I i I FFDERI No. 1 SIICP'S 1'��tl1 III I i� FOX •r yi. I :i`� No. 2 ,IIE NFURTII, _.....- in m I ' EDINA LIOUGH ' ...... EDINA l I.PAIl0 I 1 .. . ..... LTHEATER VII ..AGE LBEIIE SONS I BAN+ AM i I l .. MOBIL EHICANA I aUCIIIE RED l [AFIT SMITH 1AR i OP'S SHOPS 1110 n:KI r 1 (5) —� ® NCE AVENUE - - - - -- __ 0-0 --990 I : —I IN Barton- Aschman As sociates, Inc. ® Traffic Signal Edina Theater 130 Peak Hour Traffic Volume ( Weekday) (5) Edina Theater Peak Hour Traffic Volume (Weekday) Traffic Impact Analysis d 'Figure 3 i i i i It is projected that approximately one -half (00.5) percent of the weekday, peak P.M. hour traffic on 50th Street and France Avenue South is g enerated by the Edina Theaters. Mina Theater Traffic Impact - It is concluded that the current Edina Theaters operation has virtually no _ impact on 50th Street and France Avenue South weekday P.M. peak hour traffic operations. Even if the traffic enera g ted by Edina Theaters doubled in the P.M. peak hour, there would be no significant impact on street traffic operations and capacity. 19 ��ia..q 1 i i - �Vw M-44"R, Barton - Aschman conducted a survey of patrons entering the Edina Plitt. Theater on Friday, December 19, 1986, 4:40 P.M. to 9:40 P.M. and Saturday, December 20, 1986, 12:00 Noon to 9:40 P.M. The interview survey was taken before feature times at the theater entrance. Moviegoers were asked: 1. Did you drive? Patrons who came as passengers in a vehicle were asked no further questions. Those people who responded that they were drivers of a vehicle were then asked: 2. Did you park in the city ramps? 3. Is your primary reason for visiting the 50th and FranCe shopping center to attend the theater? The surveyors feel that they interviewed virtually 100 percent of patrons during the matinee and first evening showings and approximately 95 percent of patrons during the later peak evening showings. Children were not interviewed. Instances of vehicle loads of children being dropped off at the theater were observed. W i i i i i i Mleater operation and Attendance .' The Edina Plitt Theater facility has three separate theaters showing different features. The schedules for Friday, December 19 and Saturday, December 20 were as follows: #1 Friday, December 19, 1986 #2 #3 5:00 5:20 5:15 7:15 7:30 7:25 9:30 9:40 9:35 Saturday, December 20, 1986 #1 #2 #3 12:30 1:00 1:15 2:45 3:10 3:15 5:00 5:20 5:15 7:15 7:30 7:25 9:30 9:40 9:35 The Plitt District Supervisor (Mr. Arthur Murtha) supplied Barton- Aschman with attendance figures and a breakdown of children versus adults. These figures are for the three shows starting approximately within one -half hour of each other. The attendance figures are as follows: 21 A f f r r r i r i i i i Friday, December 19, 1986 Children Adults Total 5:00 20 61 81 7:15 48 313 361 9:30 22 345 367 SatusdaY, December 20, 1986 12:30 36 121 157 2:45 56 104 160 5:00 63 204 267 7:15 35 430 465 9:30 29 397 426 Mr. Murtha provided suPPlementarY attendance information on January 9, 19871 for the periods 5/22- 26/86, 7/2 -6/86, 8/28 - 9/3/86 and 11/25- 30 /86. Review of that data indicates that the December 19 and 20, 1986, period is an accurate representation of peak conditions. 22 a.: r r r t r i i i `V =1 • ! •.• - M Barton - Aschman conducted an inventory of ' parking spaces and a parking - occupancy survey of the Edina .municipal parking ramps located on 49 -1/2 Street and on 51st Street on December 19, 19861 from 4:40 P.M. to 9 :40 P.M. and on December 20, 1987, from 12:00 Noon to 9:40 P.M. simultaneous the Edina Theater patron interviews . A count of automobiles parked in each ramp was conducted every 20 minutes. The parking space inventory and occupancy counts are dated in Tables 1 and 2. 23 f f f 1 i i t Table 1 Edina Theater Parking Study --. 50th Street and France Avenue South Cocmvercial Center, Municir)al Parking Ram O=mancv ry 'Conducted December Edina, Minnesota 19, 1986) 12/19/86 On 51st Between On 5� Between Total 2 Start Time France & Halifax France & Halifax France & Between 1 & Halifax (Contract) (mil) 4:40 5:00 73 - 217 229 229 5:20 58 48 152 210 207 5:40 39 157 205 183 6:00 133 172 150 6:20 147 10 117 114 6:40 13 98 115 102 7:00 83 96 97 7:20 8 82 91 85 7:40 � 8 121 129 82 8:00 8 130 138 91 - 8:20 6 133 141 74 8:40 6 122 128 64 9:00 118 124 51 9:20 4 105 109 30 9:40 4 83 87 31 122 126 39 Friday - Decerber 19, 1986 Theater Feature Times #1 #2 #3 5:00 5:20 5:15 7:15 7:30 7 :25 9:30 9:40 9:35 24 Parkinq Inventory Ramp 1 Contract Ramp 1 General Total Ramp 2 80 spaces 220 spaces 300 spaces 275 total spaces 25 Table 2 Edina. Theater Parking Study 50th Street and France Avenue South Ctzercial Mmmicinal Center Parking Ram O Surve Conducted Edina, Minnesota December 20 1986 12/20/86 On 51s Between On 51st Between Total Rarrp 2 France & Halifax France & Halifax On 49 -1/2 Between 1 France & Start Time (Contract) (morel) Halifax 12:00 Noon 74 168 12:20 72 176 242 237 12:40 66 174 248 222 1:00 65 240 238 1:20 65 189 254 251 1:40 69 197 262 246 2:00 60 193 262 247 2:20 61 196 256 242 2:40 62 191 252 256 3:00 60 173 235 252 3:20 60 174 234 239 3:40 58 186 246 212 4:00 57 180 238 202 4:20 56 178 235 197 4:40 51 171 227 184 5:00 47 166 217 155 5:20 42 130 177 130 5:40 29 116 158 114 6:00 24 111 140 80 6:20 17 97 121 70 6:40 10 81 98 75 [ 7 :00 9 85 95 76 7:20 9 79 88 63 7:40 9 116 125 65 8:00 9 132 141 64 l 8:20 8 120 129 62 8:40 8 126 134 59 ( 9:00 8 122 130 54 L_ 9:20 7 191 117 54 9:40 7 98 44 I120 121, 53 ` Friday Y Decenber 20, 1986 pan}uM :nventory Feature Tines ITheater -- #1 #2 #3 Ramp 1 Contract 80 spaces 12:30 1:00 1:15 1 Cameral 220 spaces 2:45 3:10 3:15 L 5:00 5:20 5:15 Total 300 spaces 7:15 7:30 7:25 Rangy 2 275 total 9:30 9:40 9:35 spaces 25 4 Y June 6, 1978 TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority s' FROI.1: Gordon L. IIughes, Executive Director SUBJECT: Expansion Potential at 50th and France Staff has further reviewed the potential for expansion of existing businesses at 50th and Prance. This matter which was discussed at Past H.R.A. meetings has been prompted by the request of Frank Kreiser Realty to expand its existing 4000 square foot office building to 8800 square feet. Summary of .Facts A.- At present, Ordinance No. 811 -A61 states that 1) build- -- f... ings which existed at the time of the enactment of the Redevelopment Plan may utilize the public parking areas to satisf • their existing P o y g Parking re- ;;:;•'.quirements; and 2) areas identified by the Plan as sites for'new building Infill may utilize the public parkins areas to satisfy their future parking requirements; however 3) existing buildings which expand may not utilize the public parking to satisfy their additional parking requirement-but must pro- --vide their own parkins. In roost cases, this ordinance effectively precludes the expansion of existing buildings at 50th and France. B. "Insufficient parking" was the most frequently stated - problem expressed in a Businessmen's Census compiled in conjunction with the 50th and France Plan. in 1974. As a result, the improvement of the public_park:- 'in g supply was a primary objective of the 50th and France Plan. A secondary objective of the Plan was to increase the viabi.ity and variety of goods and services offered by way of private building rehabilitation and a selected pro-rain of new building inf ill. These two objectives were obviously interrelated in that the increased intensification of the area with additional commercial floor area would increase the parking; demand. Therefore, extensive studies were undertaken to analyze and fi -ne tune the relationship between available parking, (both ex.isting and proposed) and existing; and proposed comric)_cial/ Office development. Caked upon th"Se, stt:dic.::, a net addition of about 50,000 square feet of retail Ylcor arc -a -in. l 30,000 sc;,r;re feet of office floor a�:ca wac Pr01?0_:(2d to bct cc.ustructod on t; :ic:�. n i . , 'r- :� i•:ec.! :;i.tc: , nd /ot• �:i.tc� cont:_.I'li- iu£; ul: ^o'ctu of 1 :Ctur..... I'u1�1 i.c P;:; ; in; Was ;1_1 so incrca:'ec! 11RA Memorandum - June 6, 1978 Page 2 and improved in the area commensurate with the additional commercial floor area. C. Based upon these studies, it was determined that an overall parking demand of about 3.2 parkins stalls per 1000 square feet of "floor area was possible. In that the Zoning Ordinance requires 7 stalls /1000 s.f. in commercial zones and '5 stalls /1000 s.f. in office zones, staff was very concerned that the proposed parking ratio was too conservative. How- :. ever, due to the characteristics of-the 50th and France Area, we now believe 4 ..- that the 3.2 stalls /1000 s.f. ratio is proper based upon recent surveys. D. Presently, the only readily available method of in- creasing the supply of parking on the Edina side of the project would be the construction of an additional level on the southside ramp. This would provide additional 130 spaces. Other means of increasing parking would be limited %._.to the construction of additional ramps or th--, provision of parking in Minnea- ~.`polis which appears to be several years in the future. E. Properties %•:ere assessed for the 50th and France Improve- ments based upon the potential building size allowed by the Plan. Credits were granted for parking provided by individual businesses. F. The Edna Zoning Ordinance allows a maximu-ni FAR of 1.5 :and requires 7 parking spaces /1000 s.f. of commercial floor area and 5 park- `Ang spaces /1000 s.f. of office floor area. a. Parking Impact of Expansion A. Based upon recent surveys, staff has -determined that^} 'about 130 public parking stalls are presently under - utilized. Construction of an additional level on the southsidc ramp will provide about 130 more stalls. Thus, approximately 260 parking spaces pre available for future construction.' B. Complete occupancy of existing-buildings plus construe- tion of buildings allowed by the Plan will produce approximately 65,000 square feet of retail /office floor. area.- Assu,ning a parking ratio of 3.2 spaces/ 1000 s. f. this occLp: ?ncY /construction c :i.l.l utilize al,out 210 parking spaces. Therefore, approxir.. -itel -y 50 public p arl-:.ins; spices %,ill be available for the expansion of business :et, not idcn;.ificu a : in such a potential by the L. Plan. I1RA Memorandum - June 6, 1978 Page 3 C. Staff opines that about 14 existing buildings are ps OSSl. ble sites for expansion (Appendix: 1). If all such buildings expanded to a Fivt of 1.0, a net addition of approximately. 70,000 S.F. would result. Assuming a parking ratio of 3.2/1000 s.f., an additional 225 parking spaces `would be required. If all such buildings expanded to a FAR of 1.5, a net addition of approximately. 170,000 s.f. would result. This would require an "additional 540 parking spaces. D. Obviously, all businesses will not want to expand. .,..,Due to the age and utilization of their present buildings, staff believes that ~ perhaps 7 buildings are more probable expansion sites (Appendix 2). The expansion of these buildings to a FAR of 1.0 would result in a net addition of about 19,000 s.f. Assuming a parking ratio of 3.2/1000 s.f., an addition- . , al .60 spaces would be required. Expansion to a FAR of 1.5 would result in a net addition of 48, 275 s.f. This would require an additional 154 spaces. Recon:mendation Staff advises, therefore, that a policy be adopted by the H.R.A. and appropriate ordinances adopted by the City, which would allow existing buildings to expand to a FAR of 1.0 and satisfy their increased ' parking demand by way of the public parking facilities. Furthermore; build- ings may expand to a FAR of 1.5 (which is the maximum allowed by the Zoning _.Ordinance), but only if such businesses provide private parking supporting < .,that floor area exceeding an FAR of 1.0. This private parking should be based ; on 3.2 spaces /1000 s.f. - Concerns A. Such a policy and ordinances must apply equally to all buildings in the 50th and France Area. Staff has opined that some buildings may be more likely to expand than others. Iiowever, this may or may not be the case. B. So,,!c existing buildings produce a significant parking demand at off -peak hours, e.g. the Edina Theater. Conversion of this building, to a peal: -Hour core.crci.al building (which is permissible) would greatly in- crease parking dc[amnd. C. The parking; r.:,tio of 3.2 spaces /1000 :;.f. is considerably 1c :aer than that required by the Zr,ni -n!!, 0, ncc. Uti ?.:izing this ratio at 50th and 1'i.-r,nce ,.i;:y hrosrnt �nl.n, c : r.. [tt prod gas: :�n �tic r argils of the city. I1rd" June G, 1973 Page 4 - D. Tiii, Parkins, ratio is based upon the entire 50Lh and France area. Thus, the location and convenience of parking'is not considered T_ ' as it relates to the e7pansion policy. ' E. Properties identified in the Plan as having expansion potential paid for the privilege by way of the special assessment process. Other business did riot pay for an expansion potential. Thus, an inequity from the standpoint of special assessments would result. F. On the other hand, all businesses at 50th and France are zoned C -2 which allows a FAR of I-%- Sr) Mr. i„, "n—o ,,, .. -3 ___ APPENDIX 1 Lot Area E%isting Business Floor Area Net Parking Dama ^.d FAR 1 FOP. (1.5) Arericana Bank 25,400 12,480 41 82 Frank Kreiser 6,040 4,000 6 16 Lucille Smith 9,250 8,184 3 18 Business Properties 17,000 12,937 13 40 Edina Theater 15,640 11,960 12 37 • Druskin, et al 8,000 8,000 0 13 Stanchfield 7,840 9,860 0 6 Sheridan's 2,030 1,080 3 6 .. Patio Villac-e & Beauty Shop 8,910 4,880 a 13 27 Herfurth 14,500 8,000 18.. 41 Edina Clinic 6,500•." 5,163 4" 15 Hooten's 10,600 4,280 20: 37 Post Office 17,300 6,286 35 63 1st Edina 50.000 33,000 55 135 199,010 130,107 223 536 APPENDIX 2 Lot Area Existing Business Floor Area Net Parkin? DeT�r.:_y % a (I � Frank Kreiser 6,040. 4,000 6 16 Business Properties 17,000 12,937 13 40 Druskirs, General Store, ' 8,000..- 8, 000 0 et al. ��- �.�000 13 Patio Village 8,910 ! 4,880 13 27 Sheriean's 2,030 1,080 Eootea's 10,600 4,280 20 37 Edina Clinic 62500 5,168 4 1. • 59,080 40,345 59 154 f _ A DOIRSEY & WHITNEY A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROPESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 2200 FIRST BANK PLACE EAST MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 (612)340 -2600 TELEX 29 -0605 TELECOPIEE (612)340 -2868 June 22, 1987 Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland City Manager, City of Edina Director, Edina HRA 4801 West 50 Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Mr. Jerry Sand Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States 600 South County Road 18 #1525 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 Gentlemen: HRA /COUNCIL III. Re: Southdale Center; Representation of Equitable, City of Edina and Edina HRA This office has represented the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City ") and the Housing and Redevelopment: Authority of Edina, Minnesota .(the "HRA ") for many years. Also, we now represent Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States ( "Equitable "), the owner of most of Southdale Center. As we have previously discussed with Mr. Sand of Equitable, and Mr. Rosland and Mr. Hughes of the City and HRA, because of possible expansion of Southdale and because of the proposed development of the Hedberg and DeCourcy properties south of Southdale Center on France Avenue, the interests of Equitable, on the one hand, and the City and the HRA, on the other hand, are potentially adverse. We have also discussed with Mr. Sand, Mr. Rosland and Mr. Hughes, the continuing representation of Equitable by this office in matters relating to Southdale and other properties of Equitable which do not involve the City or the HRA, such as leasing and operating agreements, and the continuing representation of Edina and the HRA by this office in all matters, including those which may be adverse to Equitable. However, this office will not represent Equitable in any matters which involve the City or the HRA, including, without limitation, possible expansion of Southdale or development of the Hedberg and DeCourcy properties. DORSEY & WHITNEY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Mr. Jerry Sand. June 22, 1987 Page Two We have, as stated, consulted with Mr. Sand, Mr. Rosland and Mr. Hughes, and have provided an explanation of the above representation and the advantages and problems involved. Based upon our consultation, it is our understanding that Equitable, the City and the HRA consent to the repre- sentations by this office of Equitable, the City and the HRA, in the manner.above stated. Please indicate your consent by signing the enclosed counterpart of this letter. Very truly yours, DORSEY & WHITNEY ON 05-WAA Ili W1.04 U I DORSEY & WHITNEY Mr. Kenneth E. Rosland Mr. Jerry Sand June 22, 1987 Page Three The foregoing letter is hereby consented to: Date: , 1987 EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES By Its CITY OF EDINA By Its And Its HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its And Its Statement of Peggy Kelly rding Participation in Discussions and Voti - on the Hedber-q Property Development . I wish to make a statement concerning my possible conflict of interest regarding the development of the.Hedberg property. My husband, Michael Kelly, is president of The Center Companies. The Center Companies manages, but does not own, Southdale Shopping Center. It is possible. that the Equitable Real Estate Group, on behalf of the owners of Southdale, may raise objections to the proposed development of the Hedberg property because of its traffic impact, densities, subsidies and failure to follow the comprehensive plan. Even if such objections are raised, and despite the connection with Southdale through my husband's company, I believe that I can fairly, impartially and objectively fulfill my duties as a member of the Edina City Council, and as a Commissioner of the Edina HRA, in the discussions of, and the voting on, all aspects of the Hedberg development. 1 also believe that I must participate in the Hedberg development proceedings in order to fulfill my responsibilities "as an elected official. I have been advised by the City Attorney that I am under no clear duty under present law to disqualify myself from such discussions or votes. Therefore, I do not intend to disqualify myself from the discussions on and votes on the Hedberg development. But I do want the Council, the proposed developers and the public to know in advance of this possible conflict. MR 09 L-AMCITY OF IJP�EbDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the United Way of Minneapolis Area currently provides funding to more than 350 programs in 108 agencies, many located in and serving suburban communities... For example, in the Edina area agencies such as Storefront /Youth Action and the American Cancer Society provide programs ranging from individual and group counseling for victims of physical and sexual abuse to services for cancer patients; and WHEREAS, the efforts of thousands of community volunteers enable the United Way to maintain fundraising and administrative costs under nine cents to a dollar; and WHEREAS, in 1987 funds are being distributed to quality programs that reach more people in suburban communities. The United Way works with county planning boards and private planning groups to identify gaps in services in a continuing effort to meet the comprehensive needs of people in the six county service area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of Edina hereby support United Way's community campaigns during the week of August 19, 1987, in the City of Edina and encourage local businesses and their employees to participate in this event. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS,'on the 29th day of June, 1987, death brought to a close the active and productive life.of Robert Bahneman; and WHEREAS, Robert Bahneman, through his 19 years of employment with the -City of Edina, earned the affection and respect of the people in the City o.f Edina, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Robert Bahneman served as Chief Building Official for eight years; and WHEREAS, as the Chief Building Official he exhibited the highest level of knowledge and skill in inspections for the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, does by this resolution and public record, recognize the profound influence of Robert Bahneman upon the building inspections within the City of Edina, recognizing further that this death is a distinct loss to the City in which he lived and worked and won deep affection and respect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be spread upon the minutes of the Council and copies thereof be sent to his son, Bruce Bahneman, and to his daughter, Mary Bahneman, in recognition of Robert Bahneman's respected place within this community. ADOPTED this 6th day of July, 1987. Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 15, 1987 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. EDINA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS' TENNIS AND GOLF TEAMS COMMENDED. Mayor Courtney presented resolutions of commendation for the Edina High School Boys' Tennis and Golf Teams for recent accomplishments in winning state championships. The resolutions were unanimously adopted. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the consent agenda, with the exception of the removal of item VII.A. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETINGS OF MAY 11 AND 12 AND REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 1 1987 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to. approve the minutes of the Special Council Meetings of May.11 and 12 and the Regular Council Meeting of June 1,. 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL. Planner Craig Larsen stated that the subject.property is the site of the Fairview Southdale Hospital located immediately east of France Avenue and north of West 65th Street. The request for Final Development Plan approval to construct a new medical office building was heard by the Council at its meeting of May 18, 1987. At that meeting the Council took action to continue the hearing to allow the proponents time to consider modifications to their plan. Mr. Larsen advised that they have submitted revised plans for the Council's review. The plan illustrates the same 68,328 square foot, five story medical office building with location and materials for the building remaining unchanged. All proposed modifications relate to the parking ramp. First, the northerly 55 feet of the ramp has been eliminated. Second, the two -level portion of the ramp along the easterly property line has been reduced. Adjacent to the Colony property line, the two -level portion has been reduced from 672 feet to 408 feet. The revised northerly parking would include a basement level and one level slightly above the existing grade. Total on -site parking has been reduced by 19 spaces. The proposed berm and landscaping remain as previously proposed. Irrigation of the entire site is included with the proposed landscaping. Howard Dahlgren, consultant representing Fairview Southdale Hospital, presented the details of the modifications by showing slides which illustrated the plan as revised. In response to questions raised by the Council previously, Mr. Dahlgren explained that future expansion for the hospital could be provided by expanding it to an eight story level in its entirety with additional ramping on the west side parking area. He advised that Fairview Southdale presently has no plans to expand the hospital. He pointed out the additional green space that will be.provided by cutting the parking ramp back 55 feet at the surface level and 262 feet at the second level. To lessen the visual impact for the residents at The Colony, Mr. Dahlgren said that 14 foot coniferous trees and 4" diameter deciduous trees will be provided along the easterly side of the ramp. With regard to the entrance to the site on West 65th Street at Drew Avenue, he said the hospital is willing to add an additional "in" lane if staff feels it is needed. If signalization is warranted in the future for that intersection or the one to the south at West 66th Street, Mr. Dahlgren said the hospital is willing to pay its fair share of the cost of construction of those signals: He concluded his presentation by reiterating that the revised plan reduces the impact on the residents of The Colony, that they cannot reduce the size of the building further as economically it would not be feasible and requested approval of the proposal as presented. Member Smith commented that he felt they did a creative revision on the north end of the ramp. He asked what the contribution would be from the hospital for the signal at 65th and Drew. Engineer Hoffman explained that they would be asked to contribute at least 25% of the cost of the signal construction, based on one leg of four at that intersection. He said that if you need a traffic signal that, traditionally, the state, county or City participates on the.basis of legs whereby you access the intersection. He said that when you look at traffic generation, obviously, there are a lot of other folks that contribute to the system. For history purposes, Mr. Hoffman explained that the two traffic signals on France next to Southdale Center and office buildings were paid for at 100% because the Center and the office buildings were the reasons for the signals. He said he did not look for local contribution for a traffic signal at West 66th Street and Drew Avenue because it is a county road that is used by many people. Member Smith said that he would like to encourage as much traffic as possible coming out of the hospital complex to go down Drew Avenue or Barrie Road to West 66th Street and to discourage traffic through The Colony. He said he had talked with Mr. Dahlgren about a possible additional "out" lane at the Drew Avenue intersection. Member Smith recalled that at the last meeting the hospital had offered to employ The Colony maintenance people to make sure that the property between The Colony and the parking ramp is maintained. Mr. Dahlgren said that there are two things the hospital is willing to do regarding maintenance: 1) they will replace all the grass area between The Colony's parking lot and the ramp, will put in an irrigation system in the entire area and maintain all of that area if The Colony so desires and signs a legal document giving the hospital that right, or 2) the hospital is willing to hire the maintenance people used by The Colony to maintain the hospital's green area adjacent to The Colony. Phillip Smith, President of Colony of Edina Condominium Association, said that, although the revised plan cuts off the northerly 55 feet of the ramp, the residents will still be looking at close to a 600 foot parking ramp. He said that the landscaping appears to offer The Colony some protection but that he was not certain that the ramp facing will make it look like anything other than a parking ramp. As to maintenance of the green area, Mr. Smith said The Colony had no objections to maintaining it as suggested by the hospital and would prefer to do so as to date the hospital has not maintained their side. Mr. Smith then asked if parking ramps are allowed in Regional Medical District zoning. Mr. Larsen responded that parking ramps would be an allowed accessory in RMD zoning. Mr. Smith concluded his remarks by saying that their major concern is the long ramp that will impact The Colony. Alvin Krulik, 6401 Colony Way, summarized his concerns and objections to the proposal as follows: 1) increased traffic congestion, 2) reduction of quality of life for The Colony residents, 3) no need for the medical office building at this site, 4) security problems, 5) visual impact, 6) increased pollutants from additional heating, 7) electronics interference, and 8) impact of the parking ramp. He concluded by asking why allow overbuilding on this site when it reflects so unfavorably on the adjacent residents and urged that the proposal be turned down. No further public comment was made. Member Kelly then introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, conditioned on: 1) landscaping as proposed including berming and irrigation, and 2) that the hospital enter into an assessment agreement ensuring financial participation in future street and traffic control improvements required on West 65th Street, based on traffic generation: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 15, 1987, be and is hereby approved. Member Smith moved as amendments these additional conditions:. a) that the City have the option to expand the entry /exit to the site in the .future if needed, b) that The Colony and hospital enter into a maintenance agreement for the area between the parking ramp and The Colony's parking lot, and c) that the City with other governmental units continue monitoring of the pollutants problem. The motion for amendment a) was seconded by Member Richards but was defeated by a 3 to. 2 vote; amendments b) and c) failed for lack of a second. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion to adopt the resolution. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED FOR REGIS CORPORATION: VACATION OF PORTION OF' ARCADIA AVENUE GRANTED.. The request for final development plan approval and vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue affecting the same property, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Planner Craig Larsen recalled that the request for approval of the final development plan for Regis Corporation, 5000 Normandale Road, was continued by the Council at its meeting of May 18, 1987 to allow the opportunity for neighboring property owners to comment on the proposal, specifically, the owners of the Eden 100 Building and The Pantry restaurant. The continuance also allowed time to publish and notify adjacent property owners of the proposed vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue. Mr. Larsen said that the proposal remains the same as presented at the May 18, 1987 meeting. The Regis property comprises three sites;.their existing headquarters building on the northeast corner, a one -story office building at 5075 Arcadia Avenue containing approximately 4,100 square feet and the Biltmore Bowl and shops at 5113 W. 50th Street. Together the properties are 4.2 acres in size and are zoned Planned Commercial District. Regis Corporation intends to redevelop this site as their new corporate headquarters. Mr. Larsen said that the redevelopment plan calls for demolition of the 4,100 square foot building and the construction of a new 3 -story building containing a gross floor area of 23,765 square feet. Total office area will be 41,265 square feet. Regis is proposing 137 parking spaces on the easterly portion of the property. This parking count does not include the 86 spaces provided for the bowling alley. The Zoning Ordinance would require 206 parking spaces for a building of this size. Regis will provide a proof of parking agreement to solve any future parking shortages in support of the variance request. They feel that the number of parking spaces provided by the plan would be adequate for their needs for some time. Mr. Larsen pointed out that the building is situated as far to the east as possible in order to maximize parking on the site. Consequently, building setback variances are necessary along the frontage road of T.H. 100. The plan also needs a temporary variance on the exterior materials for the existing building. Regis has indicated that in about five years they plan to either remove the existing building or re -skin it to meet ordinance requirements. The plan also proposes the vacation of the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue. The vacated right of way would provide approximately. 21 parking spaces for the redeveloped property. Mr. Larsen noted that the proposed vacation is consistent with recommendations made by BRW in the land use study made of the Grandview area. The Community Development and Planning Commission recommended approval of the final development plan with the following conditions: 1) staff approval of the landscaping plan, 2) execution of a proof of parking.agreement, 3) vacation of the Arcadia Avenue right of way by the Council, and 4) that the variance for exterior materials be temporary and be limited to five years. Mr. Larsen said that Mr. Hoffman would review the proposed vacation as it relates to the land use planning and traffic study that BRW has done for the City and to provide an update on.what has happened traffic -wise in the Grandview' area. Mr. Hoffman recalled.that three years ago a traffic study was done on the Grandview area in terms of a traffic flow program. The study identified several issue areas; Issue Area 4 is:the area in the vicinity -of the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue. This area was selected for study_ due to the possible redevelopment of the area and the request by the developer for vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue. The resulting design study.focused on providing better access to the area and a. larger contiguous. area for redevelopment. The proposed roadway modification basically consists of realigning the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue so that it intersects Vernon Avenue opposite Interlachen Boulevard. Mr. Hoffman presented a graphic illustrating traffic counts and .turning movement counts -for the subject area and what impact the vacation might have for properties on Arcadia Avenue. The Eden 100 building traffic basically would orient to the south to Eden Avenue. He'said that he had talked with Ken Johnson, representing The Pantry restaurant, and that Mr. Johnson had supported the proposed vacation with some conditions: l) that the roadway past the bowling alley and up to Vernon Avenue be signed as Arcadia Avenue, and 2) that the roadway be made to look like _a public roadway instead of a driveway for the bowling alley parking lot and that some of the entrances to the parking lot be closed off. It is also proposed to provide a better design on the south leg of the intersection at Vernon Avenue by the use of a narrow median to channel the traffic. Mr. Hoffman also said that he has talked at various .times with Hennepin County staff regarding the inadequacy of the traffic signal at Vernon Avenue and Interlachen Boulevard. Hennepin County has advised that they will be including in their 1988 Capital Improvement Program complete revision of the-traffic signal at that.location. Mr. Hoffman recommended that vacation of,the northerly portion of Arcadia Avenue should be conditioned on: 1) retaining a.utility easement over the vacated right of way, 2) that the roadway past the bowling alley be rebuilt and realigned by Regis, at its expense, pursuant to City plans to look like a public roadway, and 3) that the bowling alley parking lot be redesigned for interior circulation with the elimination of some of the entrances, pursuant to City plans. Member Kelly asked how the median at the intersection to Vernon Avenue would affect traffic coming out of the liquor store .area. Mr. Hoffman explained that it would restrict the access and as a result most vehicles exiting the parking lot will be forced to use the existing driveway at Jerry's. This will require motorists to change their driving habits but it will also provide them with a significantly better approach to the intersection at Vernon Avenue. Member Smith asked if vacated land is buildable. Mr. Hoffman said that the answer is no if there are utilities beneath and we retain an easement to service those utilities. If a developer wanted to build they could relocate the utilities. Vacated land is buildable if there are no utilities involved. Member Turner asked how great the setback variance would be for the new building. Mr. Larsen that it is 4 feet on the lower floor and increases on the two corners of the building. Michael Plautz, architect for the project, explained that the building is three stories above grade as defined from the west approach side. The base extends out -for one story only between the two existing buildings and extends past the setback line as described by Mr. Larsen. The two triangular points vary as much as 7 feet horizontally to the property line. Member Turner then asked if staff foresaw any need to redesign the interchange for T.H. 100 which would be compromised by allowing this building so close to the entrance ramp. Mr. Hoffman said he did not foresee any change at the location of the southerly end of the building. He said there could be some changes at the traffic light but that there would be sufficient right of way for any widening if needed there. Member Kelly commented that she felt it was unusual for variances and the vacation of right of way to be requested with this project and asked if there have been similar projects in the past. Mr. Larsen said he could not recall any specific project and that staff's position comes from the recommendations of the BRW study which would make this site more useful. The.vacation of Arcadia Avenue does not harm the overall flow of the traffic and makes sense for the development of the site. As to the variances, staff felt that in order to get adequate parking the building should be located to the east and that because there were no abutting buildings, only the ramp to T.H. 100, that it was a reasonable approach. Member Kelly said she was concerned about allowing a building to be built in front of an existing building that would require variances. -Mr. Paultz explained that existing offices for the Regis Corporation are cramped and they need to expand. He said they were given the charge to add 23,000 square feet of office area contiguous to the existing building because Regis has a sizeable investment in it. He said they were faced with what was the proper balance of a footprint to add to this contiguous parcel on the easterly half fronting T.H. 100 that would put in proper balance parking needs and building needs, given the site constraints. They also wanted to change the imagery of the existing building to more of a corporate look with the use of glass and stone. This is seen as the first step in the redevelopment of the site. In trying to avoid the need for variances they looked at locating the building further to the west and wrapping a ring of parking on the T.H. 100 side. He explained that the site goes up fairly steeply so that it would have been difficult to do and they .would have actually ended up with two single loaded ranks of parking on each side of the building instead of one double and one single. It was felt it would be more attractive to push the building towards T.H. 100 and develop the imagery along the highway and landscape it there. That essentially led to the placement of the building as now proposed which they felt is a reasonable request. Nancy Olson, Eden 100 Building, said she represented 20 companies within the building and was also representing Ken Johnson of The Pantry restaurant. She summarized their concerns as follows: 1) safety of the area of -the street in front of the bowling alley, 2) visibility for The Pantry - signage off Vernon Avenue and naming the roadway past the bowling alley as Arcadia Avenue,.. 3) timeliness -need to -re- educate tenants and patrons of the restaurant as to the different routing, 4) curbs along the bowling alley parking lot and a curve where Arcadia will dead end to make it look more like a roadway, 5) to have only one entrance and one exit to the bowling alley parking lot with a crosswalk for pedestrians, 6) to move the center line over on Arcadia going down to Eden Avenue so that there is adequate room -for parking on the westerly side, and 7) to improve the roadway area adjacent'to.the liquor store. Ms. Olson concluded by saying that overall they are pleased with the proposed redevelopment and they are willing to Accept the vacation of Arcadia Avenue if it will be beneficial to them by improving the existing area and roadway.. She added that if the Council takes action to approve the vacation of Arcadia that they want to be assured that the - improvements are made as suggested and that the City should request the complete plans for the area before considering approval. Attorney Erickson asked how the City would require the redesign of the parking lot and who would pay for the improvement of the roadway. Mr. Hoffman said that the vacation of Arcadia Avenue should be approved subject to the conditions.that he had recommended and that he anticipated that Regis would pay for all the improvements as the result of vacating Arcadia. Chris Fox, Vice President of Regis Corporation, said that they are prepared to make and pay for those changes to the public roadway in front of the bowling alley, i.e. one access on the north, continuous curbing, a more gentle curve to Arcadia, new driveway.approaches, required landscaping along the northern edge of that roadway together with pedestrian crosswalks, subject to Council approval.for vacating of.Arcadia and the other requested variances. Member Smith asked why the variances are so important and what the long range objective is for the Regis Corporation. Mr. Fox responded that their long range plan is to include .a substantial office.complex on the property. It would include this project as Phase I, would probably include a second and third building, perhaps of comparable size, perhaps as a replacement to their existing building. At this point one of the reasons they are asking for the skin variance is that they want to consider removing the present building. Presently they office about 100 people in the building and really can't consider it at this point without moving the company somewhere else which would be a burden at this particular point in their growth. He stated that they would like to try to move the pieces around and have some flexibility with this project being Phase I. He said they are asking for the variances to maximum the site because they would like to place all of their development on the east side of the site, with the west side of the site being used exclusively for parking. Mr. Fox said they could not build on the Arcadia Avenue easement after vacation because of the major utilities located there. Member Kelly raised the issue of traffic congestion in the future resulting from the Regis redevelopment. Mr. Fox explained that presently the bowling alley and retail uses create in and out traffic. If those uses are removed and you look at the ultimate development of the site of approximately 100 - 150,000 square feet of office space, he said they believe they will not be causing any more traffic than the current uses generate. No comment or objection being heard from the public, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to the following conditions: 1) staff approval of the landscaping plan, 2) execution of a proof of parking agreement, 3) vacation of Arcadia Avenue right of way, and 4) that the variance for exterior materials be temporary and be limited to five years: RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR REGIS CORPORATION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Regis Corporation, 5000 Normandale Road, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 15, 1987 be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Richards. Member Turner said the reason for moving approval was that the final development plan is consistent with the BRW study and the discussions on the alternatives for the area that BRW presented cover the traffic concerns. It is anticipated that there will be additional traffic with this kind of development here, but with the changes the county is proposing to make and that the developer will make in this area the increased traffic can be handled adequately. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Member Kelly said her reason for voting no was because of the requested variances. (Member Kelly left the meeting at this point.) Member Richards then introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to the following conditions which must be met and performed before the vacation is effective: 1) execution by Regis Corporation of a utility easement over the vacated right of way, and 2) reconstruction of the roadway past the bowling alley to roadway standards with curb, all to be done by developer at its expense, pursuant to City plans, and 3) redesign of the bowling alley parking lot for better interior circulation with entrances and exits, all to be done by the developer at its expense, pursuant to plans to be approved by the City Engineer: RESOLUTION VACATING PORTION OF ARCADIA AVENUE WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council, adopted the 18th day of May, 1987 fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of a portion of Arcadia Avenue; WHEREAS, two weeks' published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 15th day of June, 1987, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said street vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council has considered the extent to which the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, cable television or telephone poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such street or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin .County, Minnesota, that the following described portion of Arcadia Avenue be and is hereby vacated as of June 16, 1987: Description of Portion of Arcadia Avenue to be Vacated: That part of Arcadia Avenue as dedicated in the recorded plat of Tingdale Bros' Brookside according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying southerly of a line drawn from a point on a line run parallel with and distant 20 feet southerly of the north line of Lot 1, Block 8, said Tingdale Bros' Brookside distant 15 feet west of its intersection with the east line of said Lot 1, to a point on the north line of Lot 17, Block 7, said Tingdale Bros' Brookside, distant 25 feet east of the northwest corner of said Lot 17, Block 7, and lying northerly of the easterly extension of the north line of the roadway easement across Lots 5, 6, 7, said Block 8 as recorded under Document.No. 1079434 in the office of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Part of Parcel 20 S.P. 5 -31 -3 and Part of Parcel 38B S.P. 2733.(100 =130) 903 That part of Tract A described below: Tract A. All of Lots 1 and 2 except that part of said Lot 2 lying northerly' of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 2 distant 20 feet south of the northeast corner thereof; thence' running southwesterly to a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 40 feet south of the northwest corner thereof, Block 8, Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title hereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 539711; which lies northeasterly of Line 1 described below and southerly of Line 2 described below: Line 1. Beginning at a point on a line run parallel with and distant 20 feet southerly of the north line of said Lot 1, distant 15 feet west of its intersection with the east line of said Lot 1, thence run southeasterly to a point on the east line of said Lot 1, distant 20 feet southerly of said intersection and there terminating; Line 2. Beginning at the point of beginning of Line 1 described above; thence run easterly to a point on the north line of Lot 17, Block 7, said Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, distant 25 feet east of the northwest corner thereof and there terminating; together with all right of access control, being the right of ingress to and egress from that part of Parcel 38B herein conveyed to the,lands adjacent thereto. Part of Parcel 40B S.P. 2733 (100 =130) 903 That part of Tract A described below: Tract A. Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, Block 7, Tingdale Bros' Brookside, including that portion of the south half of Yancy Street vacated, located between extensions northward of the east and west lines of Lots 1 and 17 of said Block 7, but excepting therefrom any portion of said Lots taken by the State of Minnesota for state highway purposes, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No. 594790; which lies northwesterly of Line 1 described below and southerly of Line 2 described below: Line 1. Beginning at a point on the north line of Lot 17 said Block 7 distant 25 feet east of the northwest corner thereof; thence run southwesterly to the southwest corner of said Lot 17 and there terminating; Line 2. Beginning at the point of beginning of Line 1 described above; thence run westerly to a point on a line run parallel with and distant 20 feet southerly of the north line of Lot 1, Block 8, said Tingdale Bros.' Brookside, distant 15 feet west of its intersection with the east line of said Lot 1 and there terminating; together with all right of access control, being the right of ingress to and egress from that part of Parcel 40B herein conveyed to the lands adjacent thereto. The City of Edina reserves in favor of itself a utility easement within said described vacated street for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for otherwise attending to, underground watermains as deemed necessary by the City of Edina to provide service to customers along this route; and The City of Edina reserves in favor of Minnesota Gas Company a utility easement within said described vacated street for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for otherwise attending to, underground gas lines required to provide service to customers along this route; and The City of Edina reserves in favor of Northwestern Bell Telephone Company a utility easement within said described vacated street for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of, and for otherwise attending to, underground conduit, manholes, cables, wires and poles required for telephone communications and to provide service to customers along this route. The Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851 upon performance of the three conditions afore set out. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney. Resolution adopted. (Member Kelly returned to the meeting at this point.) *PUBLIC HEARING ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BUILDING EXPANSION FOR CINEPLEX ODEON CORPORATION (EDINA THEATRE) CONTINUED TO 716. Motion of Member Smith was seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on approval of the Final Development Plan for building expansion for Cineplex Odeon Corporation (Edina Theatre) to the meeting of July 6, 1987. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR NORMANDALE LUTHERAN_ CHURCH BUILDING EXPANSION APPROVED. Affidavits of notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request of Normandale Lutheran Church, generally located west of T.H. 100 and south of Valley View Road, for a conditional use permit to allow a building expansion. The expansion would occur in two parts. It would add one floor to the educational wing on the south side and would also include the demolition of and reconstruction of the northerly office wing. The addition to the educational wing would only be partially finished. About one third of the space would be finished for choir rehearsal and a music library. The remainder of the space would be reserved for future needs of the church. The reconstructed northerly wing would provide office space on the upper floor and youth activity and nursery space on the lower floor. The proposed additions would result in a net increase of 16,376 square feet of building area. Mr. Larsen explained that the Zoning Ordinance requires that churches maintain a 50 foot setback from all property lines. The westerly portion of the existing north wing provides a setback of approximately 27 feet. The new wing would increase to 44 feet the setback at this same point. The rest of the main building would provide the required 50 foot setback. He noted that the exterior stairwells in two locations on the north wall provide 33 and 47 foot setbacks. Consequently a 17 foot setback variance is requested. Using 22 inches per seat, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, the church has a capacity of 515 persons. At one parking space for each 3 seats, 172 parking spaces are required. Currently there are 216 parking spaces on the site. Following construction on -site parking will be reduced to 194 spaces. The church has informed staff that their average combined attendance is 640 persons, and that the largest single service attendance is 400 persons. This would result in a parking demand of 133 spaces. Mr. Larsen said that surface parking areas are not screened from the street as required by the Zoning Ordinance. The church has indicated to staff that they are going _to improve the landscaping and screening to meet ordinance requirements. A specific plan for this landscaping has not been provided. At its meeting of May 27, 1987 the Community Development and Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit conditioned on staff approval of a landscaping /screening plan that would comply with ordinance requirements. Lloyd Berquist, architect for the project, said that the expansion to the educational wing on the south side was anticipated when the building was constructed 15 years ago so that the third floor can be added. The reconstruction of the northerly wing will increase that area from approximately 13,000 square feet to 20,000 square feet. Mr. Bergquist said the landscaping plan will be presented to staff and it will reinforce the existing screening along Valley View Drive and Wilryan Avenue. With regard to the requested setback variance, Mr. Bergquist stated that the .church would like to maximize the area available on the north side of the property. He pointed out that the reconstructed north wing will be located substantially back from the existing building which was constructed in 1951. At that time the old T.H. 100 was in place and the highway has subsequently been changed since that date. Mr. Bergquist said the church feels there will be no adverse impact on the neighborhood as a result of the project. Member Kelly asked if the gymnasium space would be available for public use. Mr. Bergquist said that principally it is designed for congregational use and would provide a place for the youth of the congregation. Don Dahlquist, Building Chairman, responded that Normandale Church provides space for public use such as scouting programs, polling place for elections, and other public uses. Member Smith noted that a letter objecting the expansion of the southern wing was received from L. B. Slee, 5025 Valley View Road, and asked if the church was aware of the letter. Mr. Dahlquist commented that the church had held a neighborhood meeting to inform impacted neighbors of the proposed plan and that comment generally was favorable. No further comment or objection being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, subject to staff approval of the landscaping plan: RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL OF FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH BE IS RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Final Development Plan for Normandale Lutheran Church, 6100 Normandale Road, presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 15, 1987 be and is hereby approved. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes:. Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney ORDINANCE NO 1222 -A3 (DEFINING AND REGULATING USE OF PROGRAMMED PARKS) ADOPTED SECOND READING WAIVED: COMMENTS HEARD REGARDING EDINBOROUGH PARK RENTALS /LIQUOR. Manager Rosland stated that staff felt the City should strengthen the ordinance regulating conduct in public parks and in particular programmed parks such as Edinborough in order to operate the parks in an orderly manner. He said that the Park Board had reviewed the proposed amendment at their-meeting of June 9, 1987 and had approved it. Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 1222 -A3 with waiver of Second Reading. as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1222 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1222 TO DEFINE AND REGULATE USE OF PROGRAMMED PARKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sec..17 of Ordinance No. 1222 is renumber Sec. 18, and a new Sec. 17 is added to Ordinance No. 1222 as follows: Sec. 17.. Programmed Parks (a) Definition. A programmed park shall mean any enclosed public park in which activities are programmed or scheduled by, or under the supervision of, the Director of Parks, or his representative. This includes but is not limited to Edinborough Park. (b) Administration. (i) Act in a manner that is disruptive or distracting to programmed or scheduled activities. (ii) Use the park or any equipment therein in a manner inconsistent with the programmed or scheduled" activities. (iii) Physically obstruct free passage on walkways and paths within the park. - (iv) Run or move rapidly along walkways or pathways within the park in a manner that would interfere with sedentary use of the park or would be disruptive or dangerous to pedestrian traffic within the park. (v) Be or remain within the park before or after posted hours of operation without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. (vi) Be or remain within any area of the park.closed to public use without written permission of the Director of Parks, or his representative. (vii) Walk, run, climb, sit, stand or be physically present in any area designed for or planted with vegetation, or be in any water area or other area not designed for human activity. (viii) Use any electric sound receiving, transmission or reproducing devise in such a manner as to annoy or disturb persons within the park, or disturb or interface with programmed or scheduled activities. (ix) Use or consume alcoholic beverages contrary to any ordinance of the City or contrary to any rules or regulations related thereto, or contrary to any license or lease by which the user or consumer is within the park. (x) Use or consume alcoholic beverages not dispensed by a person or group duly licensed by the City to use the park. (xi) Use tobacco in any form. (xii) Operate skateboards, roller skates, bicycles, scooters, or similar vehicles or devices, unless part of a programmed or scheduled activity. (xiii) Act disorderly, as defined by Ordinance No. 1001. (xiv) Trespass, as- defined by Ordinance No. 1001. - Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Member Kelly asked if private organizations who have asked to use Edinborough Park were aware that no alcoholic beverages can be sold and that no use of tobacco is. allowed. Manager Rosland said such groups are advised of the restrictions upon initial contact and that the entire park is posted "No Smoking Member Smith suggested that Sue Hoigaard's comments be heard at this time in connection with the discussion (Agenda Item VI.A.) Mrs. Hoigaard stated that she is in charge of a fund raiser and is looking for a site for it. Edinborough Park was recommended 'to her but she was told there .could be no sale or serving of liquor. Because she felt other similar events and private groups will be looking to rent Edinborough Park or the Braemar Clubhouse,'she asked what the possibility would be of an ordinance change -that would permit this for private parties. Manager Rosland advised that under state statutes-the City of Edina cannot issue on -sale liquor licenses. The City's ordinance allows on -sale wine licenses to be issued only to restaurants having 25 or.more seats. Alcoholic beverages cannot.be sold but can be served if they are given away at private parties. Mr. Rosland explained that in order to serve liquor that was given away at Edinborough the ordinance would have to be amended to allow liquor to be consumed in a public park. Under the present ordinance wine and beer could be consumed,.but not.sold, in Edinborough Park. He added that by special legislation the annual Edinamite-benefit is issued a temporary liquor license through one of the licenses held by the country clubs. In summary, Member Smith commented that, unless the Council changes its present policy, there can be no selling or consuming of liquor in Edinborough Park or Braemar Clubhouse except that wine can be consumed if it is not sold. Mayor Courtney then called for a rollcall vote on the ordinance. Rollcall: Ayes: Richards, Smith, :Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Ordinance adopted. BID AWARDED FOR REMOVAL OF BOULEVARD TREES. Manager Rosland explained that bids were received from Tim's Tree Service and Arp's Tree Service at $9,500.00 each for removal of boulevard trees. Because Arp's Tree Service could not do the work for some time, staff would recommend award of bid to Tim's Tree Service at $9,500.00. Motion of.Member Kelly was seconded by Member Turner for award of bid to Tim's Tree Service at $9,500.00. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO SNOW PLOW WINGS. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for two snow plow wings to recommended low bidder, LaHass Manufacturing & Sales, Inc., at $6,792.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. BID AWARDED FOR CITY INSURANCE RENEWALS. Manager Rosland introduced Bill Homeyer, Horizon Agency, to present the insurance quotations for the City's insurance renewals as follows: Premiums 1. HARTFORD - Property $ 56,990.00 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor — $500,000 limit 53,133.00 PENCO - General Liability.- 600,000 limit 198,665.00 Automobile 600,000 limit 95,862.00 (no comp. or collision) LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between $80,692 and $310,111 Premium= 80,692 + losses x 1.10 .Premium does not vary with losses; except workers compensation 2. HARTFORD - Property 56,990.00 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $500,000 limit 53,133.00 NATIONAL UNION General Liability - $600,000 limit 178,396.00 Automobile - 600,000 limit 118,236.00 (no comp. or collision) LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between $80,692 and $310,111 Premium does not vary with losses; except workers compensation General Liability on Claims Made Form 3. HARTFORD - Property 56,990.00 HOME INSURANCE - General Liability, including liquor - $500,000 limit 142,455.00 Automobile - 500,000 limit 61,873.00 (includes $10,000 charge for comp, and collision - fire trucks) HOME INSURANCE - Workers Compensation $279,560.00 Present Plan - premium varies with losses on all lines except property 4. LEAGUE - Property 59,575.00 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $500,000 limit 53,133.00 LEAGUE - General Liability- $600,000 limit 99,380.00 Automobile - 600,000 limit 20,016.00 (no comp. and collision) LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between $80,692 and 310,111 $10,000 deductible property; $25,000 deductible G.L. & auto (including defense costs) subject to annual maximum deductible of $125,000 - G.L. is on claims . made form (34,385 cost to purchase extended reporting endorsement) 5. HARTFORD - Property, General Liability, Liquor, and Automobile $231,150.00 LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between $80,692 and 310,111 City to pay all claims up to $50,000 any one occurrence; subject to an annual maximum of $210,000. Plan has the advantage . of the City holding money until Auto and G.L. claims are actually paid. Also, City determines if payment should be made or claim should be litigated. G.L. on claims made form. ($172,000 cost to purchase extended reporting endorsement) Following the presentation of the plans, explanation thereof and discussion, Member Smith made a motion to approve quotation 3. above and award bids as follows: HARTFORD - Property $ 56,990.00 HOME INSURANCE - General Liability, including liquor 142,455.00 Automobile - 61,873.00 HOME INSURANCE - Workers Compensation 279,560.00 Motion was seconded by Member Richards. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. MASTER PLAN FOR ARNESON ACRES PARK APPROVED: PHASE I FUNDING AUTHORIZED. Manager Rosland recalled that on March 2, 1987 the Council had given concept approval of the master plan for Arneson Acres Park. At its meeting of April 20, 1987, following a public hearing the Council had granted a Conditional Use Permit to allow renovation and expansion of the Arneson home to house the Edina Historical Society and the Edina Garden Council. At that meeting the Council suggested that staff hold a meeting with the affected neighbors to explain the master plan for the park and to discuss their concerns. Mr. Rosland said that a neighborhood meeting was held on May 19, 1987 as reflected in the Park Board Minutes of June 9, 1987. The Park Board took action to recommend adoption of the Master Plan as presented except that the parking of busses on West 70th Street would be eliminated and that a committee be formed consisting of members of the Edina Historical Society, the Edina Garden Council and representatives from the neighborhood, not to exceed three, for the purpose of keeping the neighborhood informed on the park development. Included in the recommendation was the approval of Phase I of the master plan (renovation of the Arneson house) with the estimated cost of $35,000.00 to be paid from the developers' fund. Mr. Rosland said that the raising of funds for Phase II (addition to the Arneson house) would be part of the 1988 Centennial project if the Council so directs. Staff would recommend approval of the master plan for Arneson Acres Park and funding of Phase I from the developers' fund. A discussion followed regarding the petition to the Council from the neighborhood opposing new construction to the Arneson home, development of a pond on the Arneson property and parking of buses /cars on West 70th Street. Mr. Kojetin said that there was very little discussion regarding this at the neighborhood meeting. He added that Joseph Florenzano, 4712 West 70th Street, who had raised objections at the public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit, had presented the petition and that Mr. Florenzano was willing to be on the committee to keep the neighborhood informed as to developments in the park. No public comment being heard, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that the Master Plan for Arneson Acres Park as presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 15, 1987, be and is hereby granted final approval; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the $35,000.00 cost for Phase I renovation to the Arneson house be paid from the developer's fund. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Member Smith asked when the Council would take action on Phase II. Mr. Rosland said that he would like to have the supporters of Phase II present their comments to the Council before action is taken. Member Richards suggested they be notified when the matter will be placed on the Council agenda for action so that they could be present. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF 6/9/87 APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman noted that there were no requests in Section A for Council approval. With regard to Section B of the minutes and reference to accidents involving deer struck by vehicles on the Crosstown Highway between County Road 18 and Gleason Road, Mr. Hoffman said the committee had suggested that the City follow -up with MNDOT for signing on Highway 169 as it.runs concurrently with the Crosstown Highway. He reported he had received a memorandum from MNDOT stating that this was an issue that should be addressed and they were planning on installing such signage. Section C of the Minutes related to. a request to discuss traffic safety concerns on County Road 18, north of Interstate 494. This section of roadway has been identified as the worst accident site in the metro area freeway system. The Committee recommended that the Council pass a resolution requesting Hennepin County to provide a safety solution to this dangerous roadway. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Smith to acknowledge Section B of the Minutes and to adopt the following resolution as recommended in Section C: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, County Road 18 between Valley View Road and I -494 is a county facility with a particularly high frequency of accidents on the southbound lanes; and WHEREAS, the City Traffic Enforcement Unit has issued 163 speeding citations since January 1, 1987, with the average violator's speed in excess of 70 mph; and WHEREAS, the City Traffic Safety Committee has reviewed the highway section as to safety concerns and found that accident and speed problems exist; NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby request Hennepin County to provide a safety solution to an ever increasing problem. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. SMOKING POLICY FOR CITY AND PARK FACILITIES DISCUSSED: POLICIES APPROVED. Manager Rosland stated that in response to the Council's directive to report on the smoking policies in Park and City facilities, as they relate to the Minnesota .Clean Indoor Air Act, the Edina Park Board discussed the subject of smoke fee park buildings at their meeting of May 12, 1987 and have recommended the following: Park Building Recommended Policy Art Center No Smoking Braemar Arena No Smoking (In effect) Braemar Pavilion No Smoking (In effect) Braemar Clubhouse: Grill Room 50% NS, 50% Smoking Pro -shop No Smoking Ladies Lounge No Smoking Mens Lounge No Smoking Braemar Room - Public Meetings No Smoking Braemar Room - Private Parties Leasee's Option Mixed Lounge Smoking Allowed East Corridor Smoking Allowed Patios Smoking Allowed Golf Maintenance Building No Smoking A -Frame No Smoking Baseball Complex Building: Control Booth No Smoking All Other Areas No Smoking Gun Range No Smoking Edina Golf Dome: Dome Area No Smoking Office /Entry Area Smoking in Designated Areas Edinborough.Park No Smoking (In effect) Edina Municipal Pool No Smoking Senior Center No Smoking (Except in large _ room center west side) Warming Houses: No Smoking (In Effect) (Includes Arden Park, Cornelia School, Countryside Park, Creek Valley Park, Highland Park, Normandale Park, Pamela Park, Strachauer Park, Walnut Ridge Park, Lewis Park and Weber Park) Mr. Rosland advised that other city buildings are designated as follows: City Hall - Smoking prohibited except where designated. Some private offices and a portion of the lunchroom are designated smoking permitted. Liquor Stores - Smoking prohibited. Fire Station - Smoking prohibited except where designated. The Public Works building should be evaluated and appropriate areas designated to permit smoking if desirable with an appropriate sign posted at the entrance indicating the smoking status for the building. With the exception of the Public Works building, the City properties are in compliance with the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act. Some discussion followed regarding allowing.smoking in Edinborough Park when it is leased for private parties to be consistent with the policy at the Braemar Room. Mayor Courtney commented that he felt designating a portion of the City Hall lunchroom for smoking as ridiculous and unenforceable because of its limited size. Member Turner asked if staff would come back with a recommendation for the Public Works building. Mr. Rosland said he would have Mr. Velde, Sanitarian, evaluate it and then bring back a recommendation. Member Kelly asked if there is any program available for employees who want to quit smoking. Mr. Velde explained that the Bloomington Department of Public Health received a grant to conduct a study on attitudes of smoking in the work place. He said that the City of Edina employees were selected.as a control group for the study and that following completion, anyone wishing to participate in a "Quit and Win" program will have that available to them. Member Smith made a motion to: 1) Approve the smoking policies as recommended by the Edina Park Board for park facilities, 2) Have the Park Board consider making smoking an option of the leasee when Edinborough Park is leased for private functions, as is the policy for the Braemar Room, 3) - Approve the smoking policies as presented for City Hall, the liquor stores,.and the fire station, and 4) to direct staff to bring back a recommendation for a smoking policy for the Public Works building. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ON SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED. Manager Rosland reported that applications for renewal of On Sale Wine Licenses have been received from the following restaurants for the period of July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988: Daytons Boundary Waters Restaurant, Empress Restaurant, Original Pancake House, Szechuan Star Restaurant, Donaldson's Minnesota Room, Pantry Restaurant, Ediner, St. Louie - Bar -B -Que and Good Earth Restaurant. The Police and Health Departments are now processing the applications. and upon their approval the licenses will be submitted to the State Liquor Control Division for validation. Staff would recommend approval of the renewals, subject to final approval by City departments and the State. Member Smith questioned the procedure of pre - approval of the licenses before the departments have completed their investigations and suggested that renewal forms be sent earlier next year so that a report could be.available to the Council prior to approval. Motion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Kelly to approve the On Sale Wine License renewals for the restaurants named, subject to final approval by City departments and the State Liquor Control Division. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Motion carried. AGENDA ITEMS VIII. E. F AND H DEFERRED TO NEXT MEETING. Because of the lateness of the hour, Member Richards suggested that agenda items VIII. E (Fire Department Reorganization Plan) VIII. F (1987 -88 Work Program) and VIII. H (Summary of 1987 Legislative Acts) be deferred to the next Council Meeting on July 6, 1987. It was informally agreed to discuss these items at the next meeting. UPDATE GIVEN ON SWENSENS RESTAURANT. Manager Rosland advised that on June 10, 1987 Swensens Restaurant voluntarily closed their food establishment. The restaurant.will remain closed until a new food establishment license is issued to the next owner. A total of nine inspections were conducted at the restaurant over the last four weeks following Council action on May 4, 1987. Swensons passed all inspections. The remainder of the cash deposit for the inspections will be returned to the owners. No formal action was taken. WATERMAIN NO. 186 CONNECTION CHARGE ASSESSMENT APPROVED FOR 5924 WALNUT DRIVE (LOT 7. BLOCK 3. WALNUT RIDGE FIRST ADDITION). Manager Rosland informed the Council that a written request has been received to levy the charge for watermain connection against the property at 5924 Walnut Drive. Member Richards moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that it hereby authorizes the assessment of the connection charge for Watermain No. 186 in the amount of $698.24 to be levied against Lot 7, Block 3, Walnut Ridge First Addition (PIN 31- 117 -21 -31 -0022) over a six year period at the rate of 7.5% payable starting in 1988. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. UPDATE GIVEN ON I -494 CORRIDOR STUDY. Member Turner reported that the project management team for the I -494 Corridor Study will hold a special meeting with MNDOT on June 24, 1987 to persuade them to proceed with the Environment Impact Statement (EIS) and to include it in their 1988 work program. The cost for the EIS process is estimated at $900,000 and it has been proposed to share the cost between•Hennepin County, developers, participating cities, Metropolitan Airport Commission, Metropolitan Council and the Rapid Transit Board. Cost for the participating cities (which would include Edina) is proposed at 25% collectively. Member Turner asked for comments from the Council and preliminary approval to participate in the cost to keep the study moving. Member Richards said that he did not feel it would be money well spent because the study has not addressed Edina's concern regarding the land use issue. Member Smith said he concurred with Member Richards'. statement. No formal action was taken. MAYOR COURTNEY COMMENDED ON RECEIVING C.C. LUDWIG AWARD. Member Richards commended Mayor Courtney for being the recipient of the C.C. Ludwig award at the annual conference of the Minnesota League of Cities held recently in Rochester, Minnesota. He said that it was a well- deserved honor and that he was pleased -to have been present for the event. He added that he appreciated the efforts of Mr. Rosland and Ms. Smith in placing Mayor Courtney's name in nomination for the award. The other Council members added their commendations. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for payment of the.following claims as per pre -list dated 5 /15/87: General Fund $234,625.12, Art Center $3,574.00, Capital Fund $17,031.34, Swimming Pool Fund $545.92, Golf Course Fund $22,814.99, Recreation Center Fund.$2,850.45, Edinborough Park $650.00, Utility Fund $42,489.21, Liquor Dispensary Fund $85,907.14, Construction Fund $83,636.05, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $150,275.00, Total $653,399.22; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims dated 5/31/87: General Fund $639,979.60, Art Center $374.96; Swimming Pool Fund $149.94, Golf Course Fund $8,721:63, Recreation Center Fund $425.97, Gun Range Fund $113,21,.Utility.Fund $1,7iO.95, Liquor Dispensary Fund $542,680.91, Construction Fund $53,833.88, Total $1,248,011.05. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. City Clerk .w t onsent item LOCATION III. IWAP NUMBER LD -87 -10 LOCATION 6505 -6507 Gleason Court EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT J f V Vb LD -87 -10 Ron Clark Construction, Inc. 6505 -6507 Gleason Court. General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and west -of Gleason Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent is requesting a party wall division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided. Mr. Larsen concluded.staff recommends approval. Mrs. McClelland moved to recommend approval. Mr. Sked seconded the motion. All were in favor.. The motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 1, 1987 LD -87 -10 Ron Clark Construction, Inc. 6505 -6507 Gleason Court General Location: North of Crosstown Highway and west of Gleason Road The proponent is requesting a party wall division of an existing double bungalow. Separate utility connections are provided. Recommendation Staff recommends approval. That part of Lot 13, Block 1, GLEASON COURT, according to the record plat .thereof, City of. Edina, Hennepin'County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 13 distant 64.94 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, as measured along said north line, to a point on the south line of said Lot 13 distant 70.40 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, as measured along said south line, and reserving easements of record. CElt#tf•ICAIE Or LOCA11ON OF bUIUAV... hereby certify that an 6/46/87 made a survey of the location of the builuitiq on the above - described- properly and Owl the location of said building is correctly shown on the above plat. COURT G LEASON _ N �`o� 5 (11 R MCHIMARK: N T. IV. HvD @ � L. -1c, Qr 908.4 _44 909. 1 JI T a -god. LOT AREA = 1'1 34l. I }LOUSE ARIA z q 316 PEeCEuT COYEfw6E = 25% 3 I 53.33 a� I2 l� 0 M 'n .s J c H 4039'oI �. 901'b NBfl�si�2q "W A elm. 43 R= CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY I hereby certify that on 4/20/87 I surveyed the property described above and that the above plat is a correct representation of sold survey. 1 D- Jeff )a Lindgren, Llc 'nse No. 14376 r T2FS(n.TTTT0N WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 13, Block 1, Gleason Court; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate .parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel A: That part of Lot 13, Block 1, GLEASON COURT, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 13 distant 64.94 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, as measured along said north line, to a point on the south line of said Lot 13 distant 70.40 feet west of the southeast corner thereof, as measured along said south line, and reserving easements of record. and Parcel B: That part of Lot 13, Block 1, GLEASON COURT, according to the record plat thereof, City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the north line of said Lot 13 distant 64.94 feet west of the northeast corner thereof, as measured along said north line, to a point on the south line of said Lot 13 distant 70.40 feet west of the south- east corner thereof, as measured along said south line, and reserving easements of record. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land .do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE -TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: July 1, 1987 V. A. Consent Agenda Material Description (General Specifications): Sidewalk 5 -36 - Gleason Road from Cherokee Trail to Valley View Rd. (West side) Sidewalk S -37 - W. 76th St. from Valley View Rd. to France Ave. (Funded thru State Aid & Capital Fund Budget) (North Side) Quotations /Bids: Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Gunderson Bros. $86,652.35 2. Matt Bullock Contracting $89,898.20 3. Standard Sidewalk i $100,271.80 4. Alexander Construction $106,021.60 Engineer's Estimate $ 84,208.05 Department Recommendation. Gunderson Bros. $ 86,652.35 Public Works - Engineering Sig ure Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director City r ager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: u Kenneth sland, Ci Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE V.B. Consent Agenda TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 26, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): Resurfacing and repair of Creek Valley, Garden, Countryside, and Lake Edina tennis courts. Also, installation of center strap support pipes at Pamela Park west tennis court, Weber Park east tennis'court, and Highlands Park both tennis courts. Quotations /Bids: Companv 1. Recreational Surfacers 100 Turnpike Road North Minneapolis, MN 55416 2. Gopher State Sealcoat, Inc. 7700 Highway 7 St. Louis Park, MN 55426 3. Tennis West 5801 Baker Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 4. Carlson- LaVine, Inc. 2831 Aldrich Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 5. Action Court, Inc., P.O. Box D, Rosemount, MN 55068 Department Recommendation: Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bi is is not ional Surfacers Signat within the Amount of Quote or Bid $ 9,640 $ 12,882 $ 11,265 $ 10,140. $ 15,898 g 9,640 Department t bud et for the purchase. � R John Wallin, Finance Director City anager's. Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and'reco end Council approve the purchase. / �, 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kennet Rosland, City Manager V. C. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Consent Agenda TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Kojetin, Director, Park and Recreation Dept. VIA: Ken Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 23, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): All aluminum playbooster style playground equipment for Alden Park according to specification Quotations /Bids: Company. I. Earl F. Anderson and Associates, Inc. 9808 James Circle Bloomington, MN 55431 2. Flanagan Sales, Inc. P.O. Box 12886 St. Paul, MN 55112 3. St. Croix Recreation Company 915 Northland Avenue Stillwater, MN 55082 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 14,950 $ 18,300 $ 17,983.75 Department Recommendation: Earl F. Anderson and Ass iates, Inca 14,950 Signatu Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid(�;_ is not within the amount budget for the purchase. John Wallin, Finance Director Cit Manager's Endorsement: 2. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and re mmend Council approve the purchase. / 2. I recommend as an alternative: Kennekh Roslan�, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Eric Felton; Cable Television Coordinator VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE OF ITEM IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 24, 1987 Material Description (General Specifications): V. D. Consent Agenda JVC KY210BUPL Color Video Camera, Zoom Lens, Hot Shoe Microphone, VCR Cable Quotations /Bids: Company p y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Blumberg Communications, Inc. $7194.00 2. Alpha Video and Audio $7243.00 3. Video Midwest $8032.00 Department Recommendation: Signature Department Finance Director's Endorsement: The recommended bid is C�o k,, %� l e vl vol) is not within the amount budget for the purchase. a cGoun4 John Wallin, Finance Director City nager's Endorsement: 1. I concur with the recommendation of the Department and recommend Council approve the purchase. 2. I recommend as an alternative: ' i Kenneth Roisland, ity Manager M E M O R A N D U M DATE: June 10, 1987 TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager FROM: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Fire Department Reorganization Plan - -- Summary for City Council One of your major assignments for the new Fire Chief was to examine the Fire Department's organizational structure and prepare a recommendation. This memo summarizes that recommendation. The purpose of this proposal is to suggest an alternative organizational plan that will enable the Department to more effectively manage its resources and maintain the quality of its services. This proposal is based on my assessment of the Department's strengths, needs and realities, with special attention toward anticipated developments in services over the next five years. ASSUMPTIONS AND IMPACT The plan assumes a department staff as currently authorized of 29 paid, 20 paid -on -call (volunteer) officers, specialists and firefighters. Also a clerical staff of one full and one part -time persons. The plan acknowledges the skills and abilities existing within the department ranks and anticipates the utilization of these individuals to fill new and modified positions. This would be accomplished by promotion or reassignment. The primary impact of this proposal is to separate and redefine the role of the Assistant Fire Chiefs, provide a shift lead worker supervisor position of Captain, and eliminate the position of Public Safety Director. OBJECTIVES The following are the primary objectives achievable with this proposed plan. (See Attachment) 1. Develop a structure that will place persons with authority and responsibility for programs in position to make timely decisions with continuity and follow- through. 2. Realistically anticipate developments and changes over the next five years and provide an organizational structure that can adjust and respond to such changes. 3. Maintain a management presence on workshifts by providing first -line supervisors with full authority of "supervisors" under current State Statute. 4. Separate the role of shift Assistant Chief into first -line supervisor and mid - manager components. 5. Develop a company (shift) officer position that can focus on first -line supervisory activities and perform as a lead worker. 6. Expand the role and duties of the fire prevention Assistant Chief to include a larger share of program responsibilities. 7. Develop a clear company officer position that can give focus and discipline to fire ground.company_ operations. 8. Establish an Assistant Chiefs position, that of "Operations ", with prime responsibilities of developing and maintaining consistency, continuity, communication and follow -thru across the three shift work groups. 9. Re- define the role of the Assistant Fire Chiefs) to that. of a mid -level manager with broad responsibilities and authority for all major programs and services, with special attention to planning, scheduling, budgeting and assignment functions. COST ANALYSIS The following summary shows position and salary costs based on estimates for 1988 at one full year of operation: POSITION CURRENT PLAN PROPOSED PLAN NOTES Public Safety Dir. $57,657 - -0 -- Eliminated Assistant Chief $45,740 $47,843 Assistant Chief $45,740 $47,843 Assistant Chief $45,740 - -0 -- Reassigned Acting Ass't. Chief $39,793 - -0 -- Eliminated Captain - -0 -- $44,408 New Captain - -0 -- $37,600 New Captain - -0 -- $37,600 New Callback (Captain) - -0 -- $2,880 General Alarm F.M.O. (or) Inspec. $35,718 - -0 -- Promote to Capt. Firefighter /Medic - -0 -- $21,115 New Position TOTAL: $270,388 $239,289 Costs are based on the assumptions identified and could be adjusted up or down depending on Firefighter-- FMO - -or Paramedic promoted to Captain; also numbers of candidates to be considered. TRP /ras Attachment (1) . 1 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE Edina Fire Department Current Plan: (1975) 'City Public Safety Director Fire Chief Secretary A- SHIFT/ B- SHIFT/ C- SHIFT/ ASSISTANT'CHIEF Acting Ass'.t. Asst. Chief Ass't. Chief Chief Volunteers Fire Prev. Proposed Plan (1987) A- SHIFT/ B- SHIFT/ C- SHIFT/ Captain Captain Captain I Fire E.M.S. Volunteers Prevention VI. D. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor Courtney, Council Members & Ken Rosland FROM: Leslie Turner. SUBJECT: COMMUNITY SERVICES TASK FORCE: FOLLOW -UP DATE: June 29, 1987 As you know, the Community Services Task Force Report, presented at the .joint meeting of the City Council and School Board, includes recom- mendations regarding the governance of community services. I have attached copies of those recommendations. This Community Services and Facilities Board will be established next month, and we have been asked to make our appointments. I suggest that we discuss the issue on July 6th and make our appointments July 20th. LT /sw Attachment VI. The task force will develop a recommendation for an organizational scheme in which the relationship of the several advisory boards and councils is clearly defined. Attendant to this organizational scheme will be a recommendation for an appropriate administrative line of responsibility. Additionally, the task force will develop a recommendation on the utilization and management of the Edina Community Center building. These recommendations will be presented to the Board of Education in April or May of 1987 as part of the final report (see #5). .The Task Force examined several administrative.organizational schemes and sought the input from the advisory councils of four of the community services programs. The administrative organizational scheme recommended by the task force features a new position entitled, Coordinator of.Community Services and Facilities, for overall administrative responsibility for all community services programs. A second position entitled, Coordinator of Community Education,.would have primary responsibility for the swim program, summer school, driver education and community education. The complete organizational scheme is shown in APPENDIX N. The Task Force also examined the existing advisory boards for Community Education, Kids' Club, Edina Family Center, Community Resource Pool and the defunct Edina Community Center Board. It is recommended that a new board be created entitled Edina.Community Services and Facilities Board, which would have overall responsibility for all community services programs as well as the Edina Community Center. The existing boards would be renamed as councils and be represented on the new board. A schematic of this recommendation is shown in APPENDIX 0. A listing of the responsibilities for the Edina Community Services and Facilities Board and its membership is set out in APPENDIX P. -7- APPENDIX P Community Services Governance Community services are the ultimate responsibility of the Board of Education and shall be under its general direction. The following responsibilities and functions are delegated by that Board to the Community Services Board. 1. To establish appropriate policies and to monitor policy consistency for the community services program. 2. To review and approve, subject to final action by the Board of Education, tax levies and budgets for the community services program. 3. To establish appropriate space utilization policies and to monitor space utilization of the Edina Community Center, as well as other spaces available in school buildings, and in the community for community services program. 4. To assess and address on an ongoing basis the needs of the community for growth and direction of the community services program. 5. To report annually to the Board of Education and the City Council and, as appropriate, make recommendations to each body. 6. To adopt and amend By -Laws, as appropriate, subject to review and approval by the Board of Education. The Community Services Board shall consist of the following members: 1. The chairperson, or his /her council member designee, from each of the various community service advisory councils (Edina Family Center, Community Resource Pool, Community Education, and Edina Kids Club.) 2. One member of the Edina Board of Education and one member from the Edina City Council. 3. One member of the Edina Park and Recreation Board. 4. Three community representatives at large, one to be appointed by the Edina Board of Education, one to be appointed by the Edina City Council, and one to be appointed by the Community Services Board. 5. The Coordinator of Community Services who shall serve as an ex- officio, nonvoting member and as principal staff officer. Policy adopted: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Edina, Minnesota . 'AN sr- MEH S; o, 1 e ASSOCIATION June 22, 1987 TO: City Council Members City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members, VI. E. orrzcrRse Richard Myra, President Richard Vernon, Vice President Gregory Smegal, Secretary Le Roy Lisk, Treasurer Edina Firemen's Relief Association The state law now requires that a copy of the financial report that is filed with the State Auditor must also*be presented to the City Council. To the best of my knowledge no action is required from the council. Thank -you Le Roy Lisk Treasurer 69.051 FINANCIAL REPORT, BOND, EXAMINATION Subdivision 1. Financial report and audit. The board of each salaried firefighters'and police relief association and of each volunteer firefighters' relief association with assets of at least $200,000 or liabilities of at least 5200,000, according to the most recent actuarial valuation or financial report if no valuation is required, shall: (a) Prepare a financial report covering the special and general funds of the relief association for the preceding fiscal year on a form prescribed by the state auditor. The financial report shal contain financial statements and disclosures which present the true financial condition of the relief association and the results of relief association operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and in compliance with the regulatory, financing and funding provisions of this chapter and any other applicable laws. The financial report shall be countersigned by the municipal clerk or clerk - treasurer of the municipality in which the relief association is located if the relief association is a firefighters' relief association which is directly associated with a municipal fire department or is a police relief association, or countersigned by the secretary of the independent nonprofit firefighting corporation and by the municipal clerk or clerk - treasurer of the largest Runicipality in ppopulation which contracts with the independent nonprofit firefighting corporation if the relief association is a subsidiary of an independent nonprofit firefighting corporation; (b) File the financial report in its office for public inspectionfnnd_p ;ese;nt? :i_t�to =the city_council' after the close of the fiscal year. One copy of the financial report shall be furnished to the state auditor after the close of the fiscal year; and (c) Submit to the state auditor audited financial statements which have been attested to by a certified public accountant, public accountant, or the state auditor within 180 days after the close of the fiscal year, except that the state auditor upon request of a city and a showing of inabilityy'to conform, extend the deadline. The state auditor may accept this report in lieu of the report required in clause (b) above. 6250 EracU Avenue, Edina, Minnesota 5543.6 (612) 927 -SSGS e A000049 -01 (11115186) Office of the State Auditor Firefighters Relief Association Reporting Form Office of the State Auditor 555 Park Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 (612) 297 -3685 Firefighters Relief Association of Edina, Minnesota For the Year Ended December 31, 1986 Please complete this form, per Minnesota Statutes Section 69.051 subdivision la, and return it by March 31 or for associations with assets or liabilities of at least $200,000 per Minnesota Statutes Section 69.051 subdivision 1, return it along with an audited financial statement by June 30. Firefighters Relief Association Reporting Form Year Ended December 31, 1986 Name of Relief Association Edina Fire Relief Association ^ounty of Hennepin Mailing Address 6250 Tracy Avenue • s6 City /State Edina, MN Zip Code 554-2-* TYPE OF SERVICE PENSION BENEFIT PROVIDED IN BYLAWS: ❑ Lump sum ® Monthly or other. annuity ❑ Defined contribution lump sum (split- the -pie) ❑ None ❑ Other (specify) FIRE DEPARTMENT REPORT 1. The Fire Department your Relief Association is associated with is: ® Municipal Fire. Department ❑ Independent Nonprofit Firefighting Corporation 2. The Fire Department is:. ❑ Salaried (career) ❑ Volunteer ❑ Salaried and Volunteer 3. Number of active firefighters: Salaried (career) ....................................................... 29 Volunteer ....... ................... .............................. 10 Total number of members .......................... ..................... 39 RELIEF ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIP REPORT 4. Number of active members ..:.....................:... ............ 35 5. Number of retired and /or disabled members receiving benefits 18 6. Number of retired members on deferred pension rolls ............................ BOND REPORT 7. Is the Secretary of the Relief Association bonded? ® Yes ❑ No Amount of bond $ 350,000 8. Is the Treasurer of the Relief Association bonded? ® Yes ❑ No Amount of bond $350,000 NOTE: No treasurer of a relief association governed by sections 69.77 (career or paid) shall enter upon his duties until he has given the association a bond in a reasonable amount acceptable to the municipality for faithful discharge of his duties. No treasurer of a relief association governed by sections 69.771 to 69.776 shall enter upon the duties of the office until the treasurer has given the association a faithful performance bond . in the amount equal to ten percent of the assets of the relief association; however, the bond need not exceed $500,000. 1 a as cuy� +acs a � acnc� r►awa..u.. v.. .... r.... us Year Ended December 31, 1986 BYLAWS REPORT NOTE: `All relief associations associated with a volunteer fire department and paying a monthly annuity must submit an actuarial survey every four years by July 1 of the year following the date of which the survey is prepared to the parties listed below. All relief associations associated with a salaried (career) fire department must submit an actuarial survey annually by July 1 to the parties listed below. a) State Auditor b) Your Municipality c) Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement d) Legislative Reference Library 2 AMOUNT TYPE AND AMOUNT OF OTHER BENEFITS (enter N/A if not applicable) 1. Sick: ❑ Lump Sum ❑ Weekly ® Monthly ❑ Year of Service 1 $ 180.00 2. Disability: ❑ Lump Sum ❑ Weekly ® Monthly ❑ Year of Service 2 $ 180.00 3. Funeral: ® Lump Sum ❑ Year of Service ❑ Other 3 $1.350 - 2.000 4. Accident and Health Insurance (Volunteer Firemans Benefit Depending on number of years Association or other) ........................ ..:....................:....:.. 4 ® Yes ❑ No MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE PENSION 50 5, Minimum Retirement Age ..............: .................................... 5 6. Minimum Years as an'Active Member of Fire Department ......................... ' 6 10 7. Minimum Years as an Active Member of Relief Association ...... .. ................. 7 10 COMPLETE SECTION WHICH APPLIES (Lump Sum, Monthly Annuity, or Defined Contribution Lump Sum) LUMP SUM PENSION BENEFITS (or lump sum paid in installments) . Requirements for full vesting 8. Number of Years of Service ......... ........ ............................... 8 9. Amount per Year of Service .................................................. 9 $ 10. Do Bylaws Provide for Early Vesting? ... :' ........ ........................... 10 ❑ Yes ❑ No Benefit payable for each year of service 11. $1.00 or more but less than $50.00 ............ ............................... 11 $ 12. $50.00 or more but less than $100.00 .......... ............................... 12 $ 13. $100.00 or more but less than $200.00 ......... ............................... 13 $ 14. $200.00 or more but less than $300.00 ........................................ 14 $ 15. $300.00 or more but less than $600.00 ......... ............................... 15 $ 16. $600.00 or more but less than $1, 000 .00 ........................... . ......... 16 $ 17. $1,000.00 or more but less than $2,000.00 ................ ................. 17 $ 18.$2,000.00 or more .......................... ............................... 18 $ MONTHLY ANNUITY PENSION BENEFIT 12/31/86 19. Date of Most Recent Actuarial Valuation ...................... 20. Date Filed with Dept. of Revenue /State Auditor ' ....... 20 6/30/87 Requirements for full vesting 21. Number of Years of Service .................................................. 21 .20 22. Amount per Month per Year of Service ............... ...................... 22 $ 19.40 23. Do Bylaws Provide for Early Vesting? ......................................... 23 ® Yes ❑ No Benefit payable for each month of service 24. Less than $2.00 .................. ........ ............................... 24 $ 1.62 25. $2.00 or more but less than $4.00 ............. ............................... 25 $ 26.$4.00 or more .. ............................... ... .................... 26 $ 1.62 27. Benefits after 20 years (amount per month of service) .. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION LUMP SUM (split- the -pie) 28. For Defined Contribution Lump Sum plan, please submit amount of assets accrued to 28 ❑ Yes ® No each member's account. Include members' names and date of calculation. Schedule Attached. NOTE: `All relief associations associated with a volunteer fire department and paying a monthly annuity must submit an actuarial survey every four years by July 1 of the year following the date of which the survey is prepared to the parties listed below. All relief associations associated with a salaried (career) fire department must submit an actuarial survey annually by July 1 to the parties listed below. a) State Auditor b) Your Municipality c) Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement d) Legislative Reference Library 2 If your relief association bylaws provide lump sum benefits, information for questions 7, 10 and 11 may be obtained by completing Schedules:l, II, and III. If your bylaws provide monthly annuity benefits, refer to your most recent ac- tuarial survey. If your bylaws provide defined contribution benefits (split- the -pie), complete questions 1 -9. FINANCIAL CONDITION SPECIAL FUND GENERAL FUND ASSETS 1. Cash .............. ............................... ....... 2. Investments .......... .................. ................:... 3. Accrued Interest Receivable .... ............................... 4. Other Receivables ......... ............................... .. S. TOTAL'ASSETS ...... ..................... ................. LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 6. Payables ....... 7. Required Reserves' (Accrued Liability - Schedule 1 line B) .......... 8. Surplus or (Unfunded Accrued Liability) /Fund Balance .......... . 9. Funding Ratio (line 5 - line 6+ line 7) ............................. 10. Normal Cost - 1986 (see schedule I, line C, filed by August 1, 1985)' . 11. Required Contribution to Amortize Unfunded Accrued Liability ....... RECEIPTS /REVENUES AMOUNT AMOUNT , 12. AMOUNT 12 AMOUNT 1 5,479.00 11,549 1 10.00 2 3,032,581.00 669 2 12,568:00 3 11,527.00 14 3 - 4 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 52.00 4 15 5 3,049,639.00 15 5 12,578.00 6 57,015-00 6 16 7 2,250,500.00 tAtexest& ... Gain .on. sale ............................. 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 8 673_ngn nn 8 Dividends .................... ............................... 9 202,971 1.10 9 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 10 53,385.00 19 10 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 11 20. 11 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx RECEIPTS /REVENUES AMOUNT AMOUNT , 12. CASH BALANCe /FUND BALANCE JANUARY 1 ................... 12 2; 571,864 28 7,631 12 11,549 13. State Fire Aid ...... ............................... 13 154, 669 13 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 14. City Contributions ............. ............................... 14 - 14 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 15. Members' Salary Deductions or Contributions ................ ..... 15 15 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 16. Members' Dues .............................................. 16 16 700 17. tAtexest& ... Gain .on. sale ............................. 17 157,245 17 157 18. Dividends .................... ............................... 18 202,971 18 371 19. Investments Sold ............................................. 19 1-938,217 19 20. Transfers In ... ............................... .............. 20 20 21. Other (Identify) ............. ............................... 21 1,428 21 2,190 22. TOTAL RECEIPTS / REVENUES ... ............................... 22 5,026,394 22 14,967 UISt3UH5tMtN I b 1tANtN5t5 /tANtNUI 1 UHtS AMOUNT AMOUNT SERVICE PENSIONS Number 23. Retired (Number and Amount) 24. Survivors- Spouses and Children (Number and Amount) ...... 25. Permanent Disability (Number and Amount) ............ OTHER BENEFITS 26. Sick or Temporary Disability (Number and Amount)...... 27. Death and Funeral (Number and Amount) .............. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES 28. Salaries .................................................... 29. Conventions and Meetings ...... ............................... 30. Dues .......... ............................... 31. Actuarial Valuation and Audit ......... ........... :.............. 32. Faithful Performance Bond ...... ../ ............................ 33. Other (Identify) .................. 0 ........................... OTHER 34. Investments Purchased ........ ............................... 35. State Supplemental Retirement Fund ............................ 36. Transfers Out .... . 37. Other (Identify) .I:nvestment expense .................... . 38. TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS /EXPENSES /EXPENDITURES ............ 39. CASH BALANCE /FUND BALANCE DECEMBER 31 ................ 23 83,895 24 25 23 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 24 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 25 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 26 26 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 27 27 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 28 7,631 28 625 29 1,059 29 30 707 30 31 1,550 31 32 1C)A 32 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 33 967- 33 1.764 34 1,938,217 34 35 35 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 36 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 36 37 706 37 38 9,0114,736 38 9 389 39 2.991,658 39 12,579 40. Was the Certification of Special Fund Financial Requirements for 1987 (Schedules I, II, III) certified to your municipal govern- ing body (for municipal fire department) or fire department (for independent nonprofit firefighting corporation) by August 1, 1986, in accordance with appropriate general law or special law? ❑ Yes ❑. No COTE: 'For relief associations paying lump sum benefits, please attach copies of the Schedules 1, II, and III that were submitted by August 1, 1985, to your municipality or independent fire department. 3 Firefighters Relief Association Reporting Form As of December 31, 1986 INVESTMENT REPORT PURCHASE INTEREST INSTRUMENT ':'NUMBER TYPE OF AMOUNT DATE RATE NUMBER OF SHARES INVESTMENT NAME OF INVESTMENT (AT COST) 1 Number of Shares $ 2 Certificate of deposit, common stock, bond, etc. $ . See attached schedule The purchase price including commissions, fees and any other applicable costs incurred 3 when buying the investment $ 4 - $ 5 $ 6 $ 7 $ 8 $ 9 $ 10 $ 11 $ 12 $ 13 $ 14 $ 15 $ 16 $ 17 $ 18 19 $ 20 $ Explanation of column headings: Purchase Date The date the purchase was made Interest Rate The interest rate (if applicable) Instrument Number The identifying number of the investment certificate Number of Shares For common and preferred stock investments /for bonds and CD's use face value Type of Investment Certificate of deposit, common stock, bond, etc. Name of Investment Such as U.S. Treasury, or the name of the company in which stock was purchased Amount (at cost) The purchase price including commissions, fees and any other applicable costs incurred when buying the investment 4 CERTIFICATION BY SECRETARY AND TREASURER OF RELIEF. ASSOCIATION AND MUNICIPAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OR INDEPENDENT NONPROFIT FIREFIGHTING CORPORATION We certify that to the best of our knowledge and belief, the facts presented in this report are true and correct. r 27 Signatur of SecretaO of Relief Association Phone Number Sig ure of Treasurer of Relief Association Phone Number Signature of Municipal. Clerk OR Phone Number if Independent Nonprofit Firefighting Corporation the Municipal Clerk of largest municipality in population contracting with Independent Nonprofit Firefighting Corporation Signature of Secretary of Independent Nonprofit Phone Number Firefighting Corporation (if applicable) CERTIFICATION'BY INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT Dated Dated Dated Pursuant.to Minnesota Statutes Section 69.051 subdivision la(b), we have examined the preceding statements of receipts, iisbursements and balances of the Special Fund and the General Fund and hereby certify that this is the financial condi- Jon of the Special Fund and the General Fund except as noted below: See attached financial statements and Auditors' Opinion thereon PRINT NAME OF AUDITOR/ACCOUNTANT PRINT NAME OF FIRM PRINT ADDRESS OF FIRM SIGNATURE OF AUDITOR /ACCOUNTANT PHONE NUMBER DATED If an audit or a financial statement is ravailable, please submit it along with this report. A Prcle3st -1% _p • _ ......._ ;: ±i• .:cec�ii.arts 175 Sv-, i 1 FUN: _i, : ;'•. .. LVAYL ATE`, 4T F; NY. 10o MINNEAP0US..' �:i:230Ti -t : 416 5 EDTNA FIREMEN'S EEL I,._E� ASSOCIATION SEECIAL FUND - INVESTMENTS DECEMBER 31, 1986 Purchase Number Interest date of shares rate Total Equity securities` Corporate common stock, at cost: Counsellors Tandem 10 -30 -86 2,000 $. 20,000 Burlington Northern 12 -29 -86 1,000 54,865 CSR Corp. 1.2 -23 -86 2,000 54,367 AT &T 05 -07 -85 2,000 42,263 Baxter Traverol Lab 12 -20 -85 3,000 .44,436 NSP 09 -23 -86 1,000 32,651 Bethlehem Steel 04 -15 -85 1,000 21,131 NBI, Inc. 08 -20 -86 600 .12,694 Phillips Petroleum 12 -26 -84 1,365 17,745 Lawter International, Inc. 12 -20 -85 2,000 24,164 EOK Realty 0.8 -19 -85 5,000 85,690 Keystone International, Inc. 0,9-23-86 1,000 13,299 Avery International 08 -20 -86 500 18,926 I U International Corporation 08 -03 -84 1,000 10,331 Dart and Kraft 08 -20 -86 500 30,797 Enron Corporation 01 -26 -86 500 19,635 Thomas Industries 07 -29 -86 500 6,603 General Motors 09 -03 -85 500 33,749 Dayton Hudson 08 -04 -86 1,000 511084 Bowater, Inc. 03-30 -86 1,000 27,940 Public Service - Colorado 05 -14 -86 1,000 19,236 Humana, Inc. 05 -13 -86 500 14,974 . Super Valu 05 -08 -86 500• 12,454 General Mills 11 -25 -86 1,000 41,318 Beverly Enterprises 09 -23 -86 1,000 15,063 Advanced Micro 08 -20 -86 2,000 46,661 Cigna .06 -20 -86 2,000 66,831 Schlumberger, Ltd. 01 -29 -86 500 16,667 Gen Motors 12 -23 -86 500 34,880 Pre -Mark Industries 12- -86 125 2,573 Mutual funds: New Perspective Funds Various 82342 59,494 Kemper Growth Fund, Inc. Various 15,194 145,446 Kidder, Peabody .S Growth Fund Various 3,042 45,091 .Preferred Stock: Bethlehem Steel 10 -03 -83 1,000 25,000 Phillips Petroleum 07- -85 74 1.730 91 .169,78.d ^ EDTHA FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIATION SPECIAL FUND DECEMBER - INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) 31, 1986 Purchase Number date of sbarCj. Interest rate Total I Debt securities, at amortized cost: 7.625% $ 98,932 U.S. Treasury Notes - Corp. 10 -25 -85 1979 9.75- 12.50% 121,464 Federal Home Loans Mortgage 8.55% 98,979 Federal National Mortgage Assoc. 10 -24 -85 Mortgage Bankers Financial Group 79,000 Mortgages: GNMA insured (6 mortgages) 1975 -1979 8.00 -9.50% 179,870 Corporate bonds: Houston Lighting Power Co. 09 -26 -74 10.125% 25,332 South Central Bell Telephone 09 -26 -74 10.00% 25,260 Commonwealth Edison'Co. 12 -08 -78 8.75% 24,071 CPT Corporation 12 -02 -81 10.00% 25,000 American Home.Finauce Corp. 10 -12 -84 12.125% 45,498 Certificates and notes: Adj. 50,000 Citibank (NY) 02 -07 -83 Columbia S&L (2) 08-31-83 11.35- 11.50% S 125.000 898 406 4 VI.F. TO: Ken Rosland, City Manager �I FROM: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer V SUBJECT: Boundary Change - Nine Mile Creek Watershed and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District DATE: July 1, 1987 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has requested that a boundary between their district and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District be changed. The change requested is located on the attached map. The change would be made to place land that currently does drain to the Minnehaha Creek District in their district. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District concurs with the proposed boundary change (see attached) and the City of Edina is requested to also concur. If the City concurs with the boundary change, then it is submitted to the Water Resources Board for final approval. The staff would recommend that the City of Edina concur with the request for a boundary change. FJH:lmb �: ) :`.:•tfir.S L \jc:J�t/ 1 A)IIIC hi /lL GCCK L& rsW �)Mird �tc��nq :delay in bringing this matter to a final resolution. Board members commented about the fact that they understood that this matter would be submitted to the District at this meeting for final approval of proposals by the Minneapolis Employees Retirement Fund. Mr. Schweitz responded that the owner is most anxious to resolve this manner at this time and is making every effort to do SO,.,- Chairman Kulak recommended that if no resolution of the necessary. site restoration of floodplain encroachment rights is done at the next °meeting that she would recommend to the Board that legal action be commenced at that July meeting. Following lengthy discussion regarding the status of this matter, it was moved by Madden and seconded by Kulak that the matter be continued to the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Managers for formal consideration at that time. Upon vote the motion carried with Manager McClelland abstaining. Engineers Report Mr. Obermeyer reviewed the status of activity at all permitted construction projects throughout the district.' The engineer reported that all sites are in substantial compliance with all permit conditions. Mr. Obermeyer concluded his report by noting that regular inspection visits will be made to all construction sites to insure full permit compliance. Treasurers Report The treasurer's report was submitted to the Managers following which it was moved by McClelland, seconded by Madden that the report as submitted be approved and the bills identified in that report be authorized for payment. Upon vote, the motion carried. The Managers also noted the execution of the new banking resolution and signature cards for the district. Chairman Kulak ordered those signature cards filed with the Watershed District's official bank depository. Boundary Relocation - Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Mr. Richards reported that a petition had been received from -the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requesting this district's concurrence in a minor boundary modification affecting Nine Mile Creek and Minnehaha Creek Watershed Districts. Mr. Obermeyer commented that the area proposed to be relocated from this district to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed district is within the Minnehaha Creek watershed. Following discussion, and based upon the findings that the area affected is actually within the watershed of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed district, it was moved by Madden, seconded by Kulak that this District concur in the petition of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District seeking a boundary modification as set forth in that petition. Upon vote, -4- the _motion carried. Mr. Richards was instructed to transmit that petition approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for ultimate submission to the Minnesota.Water Resources Board. Legislative Matters. Mr. Richards. reviewed several enactments of the Minnesota Legislature affecting_twater resources in the state. The Managers requested a summary. be prepared and submitted to them for review. The attorney also commented upon the recent decision in the U.S. Supreme Court regarding land use issues. This case dealing with flood plain regulations appears to have direct impact upon activities of all local units of government, including special purpose districts such.. as this watershed district. Following a review of that case, the managers requested copies of, that decision be sent to them for review.. Bredesen Park - City of Edina Chairman Kulak acknowledged receipt from Bob Kojetin, director of Edina Park and. Recreation Dept., of the new Bredesen Park directional maps and information guide. The Managers expressed appreciation to the City of Edina for completing these brochures and making them available to the Board and the public in general. The. Managers requested Chairman Kulak to express the District's appreciation to the City of Edina and Mr. Kojetin. Adjournment. There being no further business to come before the meeting, it was moved by McClelland and seconded by Madden the meeting be adjourned. Upon vote the motion- carried and Chairman Kulak declared the meeting to be adjourned. Respectfully submitted, Larry Madden, Secretary 2612 EXHIBIT B MEMO TO: Board of Managers Minnehaha Creek Watershed District FROM: Jim Mahady E.. A. Hickok and Associates DATE: June .1, 1987 RE: Proposed boundary change in the City of Edina Boundary Investigation At the request of the Board of Managers at the May 21, 1987 meeting, the existing hydrologic and legal boundary o.f the District was investigated in the City of Edina in the vicinity of Belmore Lane and Blake Road. The present legal boundary runs along the southern line of the Blake School atheletic field in the vicinity of Spruce Road and then easterly to Blake Road. The legal boundary excludes a several block area to the south and west of the existing boundary which is serviced by a City of Edina storm sewer system. This area is presently under the jurisdiction of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. A review of pertinent data and several conversations with City staff has verified that an area bounded on the west by Dearborn Street and on the south by Belmore Lane and Maloney Avenue drains via a City owned and operated force main system into the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Proposed Leqal Description The existing legal description is taken from a copy of an order from the Water Resources Board dated August 9, 1985 On Page 23, second paragraph, five lines from the top of said paragraph it reads " . .thence southe rly,on the centerline of Tyler Avenue (vacated 11/17/15) to the south line of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West; thence easterly on the south line of said section to the centerline of Blake Road (County Road 20); ". The following revised legal description will ensure that the legal boundary will more closely approximate the actual hydrologic drainage pattern. (Additions are noted with underlining.) "thence southerly on the centerline of Tyler Avenue (vacated 11/17/15) to the south line of Section 19, Township 117 North, Range 21 West; thence easterly on the south line of said section to the northerly extension of the centerline of Dearborn St.; thence southerly along the centerline of Dearborn St. extended to the centerline of Belmore Lane; thence easterly along the centerline of Belmore Lane to the centerline of Griffit St.; thence southerly along the centerline of Griffit St. to the centerline of Maloney Avenue; thence long the centerline of Malone Avenue to the cente rline of Blake Road County Road 20);". • I RECEIVED •�. JUN 12 138 MiNp AA � Ep 0�`' 4 � � BARR ENGR. CO, I Net M1 1 ■ rdA E H' " H A C H L U K LAKE MINNETONK► :-:WATERSHED DISTRICT P.O. Box 387, Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 BOARD OF MANAGERS: David H. Cochran, Res. • Albert L. Lehman • John E. Thomas Camille D. Andre • James R. Spensley • Richard R. Miller • Michael R. Carroll June 11, 1987 The Honorable Wayne Courtney Mrs. Aileen Kulak, Chair Mayor, City of Edina Nine Mile Creek Watershed Dist. 6801 W. 50th Street 3320 W. 90th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Re: Petition to Amend Common Boundary Between Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Dear Mayor Courtney and'Mrs. Kulak: Enclosed please find a Petition of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to amend a portion of the common boundary between the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District located in the City of Edina. A map showing the proposed change is attached to the Petition as is a memorandum from this office regarding the change. ,The lands in question drain into the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, but are outside its present legal boundary. The Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District requests that the common boundary be modified to include these lands in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 473.8771 Subd. 1, this change can be ordered by the Minnesota Water Resources Board if both the City and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District consent to the change. The District requests the City of Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District concur in the requested change. _ The District requests that your governing bodies act on this request at your next regular meeting. If you require any additional information regarding this Petition, please feel free to contact me. If the proposed change is found acceptable, please indicate your concurrence by executing the Statement of Concurrence appearing at the end of the Petition, and return one signed copy of the Petition to me. Sincerely, EUGENE A. HICKOK AND ASSOCIATES Engineers for the District J mes Mahady cc: :Hobert Obermeyer, Barr Engineering Co. Fran Hoffman, City of Edina L7 23, ---- w.— BELMORIll' V R. 4-S. 0.1143 LI-0- V-7 7%1 ;' F > bi 1,11 9 N 112 SEC. 30, T #7 R 21 6INLROM sult left W.D. P 0- " p e, .0 0 1E, P�7, 0. el If V11 —7- /A =rl 70) LA LA ..... ... . ....... . ... A .44 tqq 16 caa) -UAL --Y— - 0 ill , (,.I . . el . . ..... . ...... "A 14cccl PARK ASCENSION GRAND VIEW ADDITION Cll y ASsociatj invnn afjz!,.:, 21 sual; ILLA.*S AIL jj" N -v1 W I 7ER Y 1 .4 SSO 1 7.10 7 Fz T .... •EXIS TING BOUNDARY .. .. PROPOSED BOUND�RY L E �z i"-L , 2 9" 3. ,WAYNE 1 N;TE CHEN 9 z I L A is -.2i ;TERRACE.:;- C�4 GHTS L EXHIBIT A ST RFSnT.TTTTON BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that it hereby concurs in the aforesaid petition to remove certain lands from the jurisdiction of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and place said lands in the jurisdiction of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 6th, 1987 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of July, 1987. City Clerk VI. F. FL`/ /DYNE ENGINEERING CORPORATION 5900 Olson Memorial Highway Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 IN REPLY REFER TO 30- June -1987 Mayor Wayne Courtney 4313 Eton Place Edina, MN 55424 Reference: Minnehaha Watershed Board of Managers Dear Mayor Courtney: I have been on the Board of Managers of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for approximately five years while a resident of the City of Minneapolis. This June I moved into a home in Edina at 6520 Belmore Lane. At that time I become aware of that fact that this residence was inside the hydrological boundary of the watershed but outside the legal boundary of the watershed. I informed the Hennepin County Commissioners who referred the issue to the Hennepin County Attorney's office. In the meantime, both the Nine Mile Creek Watershed and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed agreed to change the legal boundary to confirm with the actual hydrological boundary. This is a noncontroversial procedure required by State statue 509. This matter will come before the Edina City Council at your July 6 meeting. The Hennepin County attorney's office issued an opinion that my seat on the watershed became vacant when I moved even though the boundary change would be made shortly after my move to the new residence. Therefore the Hennepin County Commissioners must solicit applications for the watershed appointment and I must apply to fill my own vacancy. My request to you is twofold. I am asking that you consider this boundary change at your July 6 meeting so that it can be forwarded to the State Water Resources Board. Secowd, I am asking that you consider nominating me pursuant to Statue 509 to the Hennepin County Commissioners for appointment to fill- the vacancy created when I moved to Edina. I appreciate your help in this matter and will call you to answer any questions you may have. Sincer , ichael R. Carroll, P.E. Program Manager TELEPHONE 612- 544 -2721 • TELEX 290518 • TELEFAX 612 -546 -5617 VI.G. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Housing and Redevelopment Authority /Council Members FROM: Gordon Hughes(` -�` f SUBJECT: HEDBERG PROPERTY STATUS REPORT DATE: July 2, 1987 The purpose of this memo is to update the Council /HRA on our activities concerning the Hedberg project. As you know, the Council, Park Board and Community Development & Planning Commission met jointly on May 12, 1987, to review preliminary site plans prepared by BRW for the proposed development of the Hedberg property. Since May 12, Messrs. Rosland, Hughes, Larsen, Erickson and Gilligan have met on three occasions with the project's development team to discuss potential tax increment expen- ditures, project phasing, City dedications and traffic - related concerns. 'Staff has also met with BRW to offer comments and recommendations con - cerning the site plan, particularly the park and open space element. No changes to the May 12th site plan have been submitted to the City. During the past month, meetings have also been conducted with Hennepin County (regarding France Avenue) and with developer representatives concerning State aid funds for roadways as well as tax 'increment modeling. Tasks Accomplished * A preliminary estimate of public redevelopment costs has been prepared. * An appraiser has been hired to prepare an opinion concerning our ability to meet certain criteria for T.I.F. District establishment. * The HRA /Council amended the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan. * The "problem identification" phase of the Environmental Impact Statement has been completed. GH /sw VIII.A. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor.Courtney & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland SUBJECT: CENTENNIAL FUND RAISER DATE: July 2, 1987 The Edina Centennial Commission would like to formally ask the Edina City Council to authorize that the major fund raiser for 1988 be the Edina Historical Society building addition at Arneson Acres Park. I believe that all of you are familiar with the background information and that you have made all the necessary decisions to allow this to take place. The Park Department and Bob Kojetin have met with the neighbors, and I believe all the bases have been covered. We would recommend to you that you formally authorize this request. KR /sw I �a 1 1' l f 1987 ! OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 178783 06/24/87 +rrwrr 187002 06/26/87 187002 06/26/87 187002 06/26/87 187002 06/26/87 187003 06/22/87 187003 06/23/87 187003 06/23/87 187004 06/30/87 rrwrr+ 187008 06/24/87 187008 06/24/87 187008 06/19/87 187008 06/23/87 r *errr DUES 187013 06/19/87 187013 06/19/87 187013 06/19/87 187013 06/30/87 187013 06/23/87 187013 06/23/87 187013 06/30/87 187013 06/19/87 187013 06/19/87 * + * + ** AT 3 T 187018 06/26/87 •rrrr+ 187020 06/19/87 rrrwr* TELEPHONE 187026 06/24/87 187026 06/23/87 187026 06/23/87 CHECK ISTER 07 -06 -L ,AGE 1 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 75.00 MIAMA DUES 28- 4204 - 701 -70 75.00 + * ** -CKS 5.83 AT 3 T TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 3.28 AT d T TELEPHONE 23 -4256- 612 -61 22.76 AT 6 T TELEPHONE 27- 4256 - 661 -66 7.37 AT S T TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 708 -70 39.24 * 105.40 ALBINSON REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803-80 396651 66.25 ALBINSON REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 38799 66.25 ALBINSON REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 813 -80 397499 237.90 * 399.79 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 27- 4262- 663 -66 399.79 * * ** -CKS 28.62 KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR PARTS 28- 4540 - 704 -70 1 43.96 KAMAN BEARING d SPLY REPAIR PARTS 28- 4540 - 704 -70 67.82 KAMAN BEARING d SPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 27.65 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540- 841 -84 4 168.05 * ** -CKS 171.88 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CORRECTION 10 -4294- 560 -56 1340 171.88 ALTERNATOR REBUILD RADIO SERVICSE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 1340 1 171.88- ALTERNATOR REBUILD RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 1340 99.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1346 66.04 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 1320 1 95.03 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 1343 50.02 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 1347 187.96 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 1336 1 172.74 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -56 1338 842.67 * 1 * ** -CKS 6.75 AT & T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 50- 4256 - 821 -82 1 6.75 * *** -CKS 1 41.10 AIR HYDRAULIC SYSTEM GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 335 -3b 52004 41.10 + 1 * ** -CKS 1 2,223.30 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220- 000 -00 492877 165.92 BADGER METER INC WATER SUPPLIES 40- 1220 - 000 -00 492409 1,429.52 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40 -1220- 000 -00 481122 , 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187026 06/24/87 187026 06/24/87 187026 06/19/87 187027 06/23/87 wrwwww 06/29/87 187031 06/18/87 187031 06/23/87 187031 06/23/87 187031 06/29/87 187031 06/25/87 187031 06/18/87 187031 06/29/87 187031 06/23/87 187031. 06/26/87 187031 06/24/87 187031 06/19/87 187031 06/22/87 187031 - 06/29/87 187031 06/19/87 187031 06/23/87 187031 06/23/87 187031 06/23/87 wwwwww 187033 06/29/87 187033 06/22/87 187033 06/29/87 187033- 06/22/87 187033 06/29/87 187033. 06/22/87 wwwrww 06/24/87 187037 .06/29/87 187037. 06%29/87 wwswww 187041 06/24/87 187041 06/25/87 187041 06/25/87 187041 06/19/87 187041 06/24/87 187041- 06/19/87 187041 06/24/87 187041 06/24/87 1' y - z i >ti»i -.;i i,, ipll��l .4„ iti��iV'k'J�'� li�� p{'�{�},� c�a �,,,_ 1�F�,.i•. � G�i ...r,�19 I� '.•( �.. CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 2 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE 1,348.36 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40- 1220- 000 -00 492884 4,185.60 BADGER METER INC WATER METERS 40 -1220- 000 -00 492876 63.25 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 491471 9,415.95 w 16.20 BALDWIN SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 801 -80 208500 16.20 w www -CKS 120.93 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 42.10 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 160 -16 4.92 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 260 -26 9.57 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 260 -26 302427 45.88 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 302030 243.41 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 299523 84.50 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 302427 2.36 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 600 -60 34.03 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504- 781 -78 301878 78.42 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 301877 4.12 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 300300 11.56 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 299515 68.45 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 302508 1.41 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 782 -78 298707 117.00 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 40- 4516- 800 -80 187.20 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 40- 4516 - 800 -80 163.80 BERTELSON BROS INC OFFICE SUPPLIELS 40- 4516 - 800 -80 299109 1,219.66 w www -CKS 40.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626 - 822 -82 386.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 822 -82 88.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 712.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 109.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 705.90 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 862 -86 - 2,041.90 a . www -CKS 122.15 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 275 -04 122.15 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN CONSTRUCTION 60- 13.0.0- 276 -04 244.80 w www -CKS 16.78 BURY & CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 5,193.41 BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 26887 k 3,263.71 BURY 6 CARLSON INC, BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 26887 5,906.56 BURY & CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 26718 2,532.64 BURY & CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 314 -30 d 1,879.36 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 380 -30 26718 876.96 BURY d CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 666 -66 46.98 BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 40- 4524- 803 -80 d 1' y - z i >ti»i -.;i i,, ipll��l .4„ iti��iV'k'J�'� li�� p{'�{�},� c�a �,,,_ 1�F�,.i•. � G�i ...r,�19 I� '.•( �.. 1987 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 07 -06 -L AGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 187041 06/30/87 4,836.00 BURY 6 CARLSON INC CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 002 -20 26946 24,552.40 i iii -CKS 187046 06/24/87 297.89 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV 10 -2149- 000 -00 B64165 297.89 i 187047 06/25/87 37.71 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 698527 37.71 i 187048 06/23/87 10.94 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLY 10- 4512 - 520 -52 657579 187048 06/22/87 268.42 BRISSMAN KENNEDY INC PAPER SUPPLIES 10 -4514- 520 -52 67579 279.36 i iii -CKS 187054 06/30/87 173.00 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5311 187054 06/23/87 174.96 BATTERY WAREHOUSE PARTS 10- 4620 - 560 -56 94649 347.96 i - iii -CKS 187060 06/24/87 62.00 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 187060 06/24/87 62.00 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 187060 06/25/87 93.00 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS- -- 26- 4624- 683 -68 187060 06/30/87 77.50 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSINS 26- 4624- 683 -68 187060 06/30/87 227.36 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 187060 06/19/87 245.11 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS -- 27- 4624 - 663 -66 187060 06/24/87 413.10 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 1,180.07 i 187061 06/24/87 19.52 "A" PLUS PRESORT POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510-51 19.52 i 187062 06/19/87 10.40 BROCK WHITE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 301 -30 202119 187062 06/23/87 56.10 BROCK WHITE CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 A03623 187062 06/19/87 134.40 BROCK WHITE REPAIR PARTS • -- •40 -4540- 803 -80 202725 200.90 • iii -CKS - 187064 06/30/87 179.01 THERMAL CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 J83994 187064 06/23/87 162.00 -- THERMAL CO - - -- REPAIR PARTS -• -- 50- 4540 - 841 -84 - 341.01 i 167065 06/18/87 21.45 CULLIGAN - CONTRACT SERV 10- 4200 - 482 -48 21.45 • 187066 06/23/87 78.78 - CDP - -•- -- GEN SUPPLIES -- 10- 4504 - 540 -54 751690 ` 78.78 i -- iiiiii. _... .. ._ - ---_. ., _ - .. .__. _. -- - -' •---. - - -- iii -CKS ` 187082 06/29/87 375.00 CONWAY FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 20022 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 4 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION - ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. Y MESSAGE 375.00 • ssssss es• -CKS 187087 - 06/19/87 73.65 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 187087 06/19/87 479.35 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 482 -48 553.00 • ssssss ss• -CKS 187090 06/23/87 126.68 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 22173 126.68 187091 06/26/87 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 23- 4258 - 612 -61 187091 06/26/87 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 27 -4258- 661-66 187091 06/26/87 250.25- CITY OF EDINA CORRECTION 27- 4258- 662 -66 187091 06/26/87 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATAER 27 -4258- 662 -66 187091 06/26/87 250.25 CITY OF EDINA WATER 27 -4258- 662 -66 187091 06/26/87 250.25 CITY OF EDINA WATER 27 -4258- 662 -66 187091 06/26/87 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER PURCHASED 28- 4258 - 702 -70 187091 06/26/87 20.50 CITY OF EDINA WATER 28- 4258 - 702 -70 187091 06/26/87 35.75 CITY OF EDINA WATAER 50- 4258 - 841 -84 395.10 • _- 187092 06/30/87 25.28 C 6 S DIST INC COST OF COMM 23 -4624- 613 -61 051400 187092 06/30/87 336.66 C 6 S DIST INC COST OF COMM - 23 -4624- 613 -61 051358 361.94 • sss -CKS 187120 06/29/87 2,497.15 DORSEY d WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 4218 - 220 -22 ` 187120 06/29/87 7,198.40 DORSEY 8 WHITNEY PRO SERV 10- 4218- 220 -22 9,695.55 • sss -CKS 187125 06/19/87 138.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 16857 187125 06/30/87 336.30 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560-56 16968 187125 06/22/87 312.20 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIE 10- 4504-644 -64 16711 187125 06/24/87 118.02 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 16868 187125 06/30/87 411.35 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512- 540 -54 16931 187125 06/19/87 299.00 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 16827 187125 06/29/87 3,061.00 MERIT SUPPLY WEED SPRAY 10- 4566- 643 -64 16949 W 187125---- 06/30/87 453.25 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 16918 187125 06/30/87 112.20 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 16978 187125 06/29/87 477.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 683 -68 16935 187125 - - 06/25/87 53.70 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 26 -4512- 682 -68 16948 187125 06/29/87 92.40 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 26- 4540 - 683 -68 16935 187125 06/29/87 91.40- MERIT SUPPLY CORRECTION 26- 4540 - 683 -68 16935 187125 06/29/87 91.40 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 26- 4540 - 683 -68 16935 187125 06/23/87 90.00 MERIT SUPPLY CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 682 -68 16909 187125 06/30/87 2,945.00 MERIT SUPPLY MISC 27- 1320 - 000 -00 16753 187125 - - 06/30/87 2,205.94 MERIT SUPPLY - MISC -- - 27 -1320- 000 -00 16972 187125 06/30/87 52.50 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 16473 187125 06/30/87 90.30 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 27 -4512- 662 -66 16491 x1987 PHYSIO CONTROL • OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187125 06/30/87 187125 06/30/87 187125 06/30/87 187125 06/24/87 187125 06/24/87 187125 06/24/87 ' 187125 06/24/87 187125 06/24/87 187125 06/19/87 187125 06/19/87 GEN SUPPLIES - 476.00 187132 06/30/87 GEN SUPPLIES 318.90 187136 06/30/87 187136 06/23/87 187137 06/30/87 " 187137 06/30/87 187137 06/22/87 187137 06/23/87 MERIT SUPPLY 7 13,471.83 » 187143 06/30/87 187143 06/24/87 1 RAP ss »s »» 82148 187148 06/23/87 INC FILL ' 187150 06/30/87 187150 06/25/87 187150 S 06/30/87 187153 06/19/87 187153 r 06/19/87 187156 - 06/26/87 07 -06 -, PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 27- 4512 - 662 -66 27 -4512- 662 -66 27- 4512- 663 -66 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 40- 4504 - 301 -30 40- 4504 - 301 -30 16784 16855 16661 16883 16881 16880 16833 16882 16857 142.99 PHYSIO CONTROL CHECK ISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION - 50.94 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 203.64 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 50.94 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 202.60 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 456.00 - MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES - 476.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 318.90 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 464.65 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 138.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 138.00- MERIT SUPPLY CORRECTION 13,471.83 » 82568 137.28 E KRAEMER 6 SONS 07 -06 -, PAGE 5 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 27- 4512 - 662 -66 27 -4512- 662 -66 27- 4512- 663 -66 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 40- 4504 - 301 -30 40- 4504 - 301 -30 16784 16855 16661 16883 16881 16880 16833 16882 16857 142.99 PHYSIO CONTROL 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 440 -44 A41697 142.99 i 460.00 EARL F ANDERSEN GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 71276 170.00 EARL F ANDERSEN GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 7391 630.00 s 261.64 E KRAEMER 6 SONS INC GEN SUPLIES 10- 4504 - 647 -64 82567 313.81 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERIAL 10- 4518 - 345 -30 82568 137.28 E KRAEMER 6 SONS INC RIP RAP 10 -4548- 358 -30 82148 270.03 E KRAEMER & SONS INC FILL MATERILA 40 -4518- 803 -80 82430 982.76 » 123.92 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624 - 663 -66 176.46 EMRICH BAKING CO CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 300.38 • 47.00 ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504 - 646 -64 47.00 » 22.03 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 145890 1,472.40 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS -- 10 -4540- 540 -54 145900 147.39 ELECTRONIC CENTER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 145910 1,641.82 » 13.23 - ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY -- REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 92555 23.48 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 92385 36.71 » - 10.00 - - FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL SERVICES - 10 -4201- 420 -42 - »s» -CKS i »» -CKS »»» -CKS » »» -CKS » »s -CKS »»» -CKS i»» -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187156 06/26/87 * * * *w* FEED RITE CONTROL 187158 06/23/87 187158 06/30/87 187158 06/23/87 187158 06/30/87 187159 06/24/87 * * * *w* FEED RITE CONTROL 187162 06/24/87 *www ** 187179 06/19/87 187179 06/19/87 *www ** 187181 06/22/87 187181 06/25/87 187183 06/30/87 187183 06/19/87 187183 06/24/87 167183 06/29/87 187183 06/29/87 187183 06/29/87 187183 06/29/87 187183 06/29/87 187183 06/26/87 * * * * ** FOWLER ELECTRIC 187185 06/23/87 187185 06/29/87 187185 06/23/87 * * * *ww 187188 06/23/87 187188 , 06/23/87 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 40.73 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL SERVICES 50.73 + 07 -06 -87 PAGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4201- 420-42 * ** —CKS 1,759.01 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER SERV 40- 4622- 805 -80 87342 522.77 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER 40- 4622- 805 -80 87988 928.67 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER SERVICE 40- 4622 - 805 -80 87352 1,576.64 FEED RITE CONTROL WATER 40- 4622- 805 -80 87870 4,787.09 + 2,376.15 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL C REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 810 -80 10883 2,376.15 + * ** —CKS 22.43 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 66940 22.43 + * ** —CKS 56.50 GENERAL BINDING GEN OFFICE 10- 4504 - 510 -51 37.95 GENERAL BINDING OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 94.45 + * ** —CKS 47.90 GENERAL SPORTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 627 -62 27697 45.00 GENERAL SPORTS SAFETY EQUIP 26- 4642 - 681 -68 92.90 + * ** —CKS 176.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 73528 26.10 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 72466 44.20 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642- 420 -42 73425 65.00 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 702 -70 73748 32.73— BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS CORRECTION 30- 4504 - 752 -78 32.73 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 752 -78 73764 14.43 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 73763 32.73 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 73764 4.73 BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 73756 363.19 + �; * ** —CKS d 347.21 GOODIN CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 433930 86.39 GOODIN CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 440731 227.66 GOODIN CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 437873 661.26 + *** —CKS 52.86 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 141.13 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 362691 _ A� a 198, • f OF EDINA - CHECK NO. DATE ` 187188 06/30/87 187188 - 06/30/87 rrrrrr _ --- ' 187194 06/30/87 187194 06/18/87 187194 06/30/87 • 187194 06/19/87 187194 -- 06/19/87 y rrrrrr 26- 1030 - 000 -00 ' 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 ' 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 n 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 - - 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 a 187203 06/30/87 187203 06/30/87 187203 06 /30/87 1 GENUINE PARTS Y V 4 f v 187203 CHECI ;ISTER 8.98 PETTY CASH 07 -06- PAGE 7 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 429.24 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 806 -80 364390 325.67 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO GEN SUPPLIES - 40- 4504 - 806 -80 364395 948.90 + FLAG 26- 1030 - 000 -00 187203 06/30/87 _ PETTY CASH rrr -CKS 19.00 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - 301 -30 25972 65.36 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 440 -44 77662 266.25 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 560 -56 25971 74.50 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 560 -56 77663 49.70 GENERAL COMMUNICATNS RADIO SERV 10- 4294 - 560-56 77558 474.81 + a 187209 06/19/87 9.12 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 552701 rrr -CKS 9.34 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 3160 - 000 -00 • REPAIR PARTS - - 15.00 PETTY CASH LIC FEE 10- 4201 - 200 -20 06/30/87 2.40 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4202 - 140 -14 553785 134.01 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 140 -14 GENUINE PARTS 3.41 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 160 -16 187209 32.75 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 200 -20 10 -4620- 560 -56 2.77 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10 -4208- 160 -16 1,286.23 r 1.00 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4208 - 480 -48 18.13 PETTY CASH PARKING 10- 4208 - 510 -51 2.25 PETTY CASH MILEAGE /REG 10 -4208- 600 -60 8.19 PETTY CASH MILEAGE /REG 10- 4208- 800 -80 2.20 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 HIRSHFIELDS 11.96 PETTY CASH REG EXPENSE 10- 4500 - 600 -60 187215 - - 16.15 PETTY CASH FILM /DEV 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4540 - 520 -52- 5.71 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10- 4504 - 260 -26 45.96 + 15.00 PETTY CASH TENNIS MEMB 10- 4504 - 623 -62 56.37 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 4.45 PETTY CASH KITCHEN SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 Y V 4 f v 187203 06/30/87 8.98 PETTY CASH GEN SUPPLIS 25- 4504 - 682 -68 v 187203 - 06/30/87 8.98- PETTY CASH - - - -- -- .CORRECTION - 25- 4504 - 682 -68 187203 06/30/87 19.00 PETTY CASH FLAG 26- 1030 - 000 -00 187203 06/30/87 8.98 PETTY CASH GEN SUPP 26- 4504 - 682-68 369.07 + rrrrrr rrr -CKS 187209 06/23/87 61.50 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 553624 a 187209 06/19/87 9.12 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 552701 187209 06/19/87 70.70 GENUINE PARTS • REPAIR PARTS - - 10- 4540 - 560 -56 552700 187209 06/30/87 129.61 GENUINE PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 553785 9 187209 06/19/87 890.00 GENUINE PARTS TOOLS 10 -4580- 560 -56 318033 187209 06/19/87 125.30 GENUINE PARTS -- PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 552870 1,286.23 r v rrr -CKS ' 187215 06/23/87 11.49 HIRSHFIELDS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 187215 - - -- - 06/19/87 -34.47 - - - -- . HIRSHFIELDS - - - - - ---- - -- REPAIR - PARTS------- -- -- -- 10- 4540 - 520 -52- 45.96 + a ; rrr -CKS J 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 8 •J CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 187220 06/19/87 840.00 HAR NED LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 187220 06/19/87 8,740.00 HAR NED LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 003 187220 06/19/87 8,740.00- HAR NED LUMBER CO CORRECTION 10- 4540 - 520 -52 840.00 - ++# -CKS 187231 06/24/87 353.00 HOFFERS INC PAINT 10-4544- 642 -64 35846 353.00 + t++ -CKS 187234 06/29/87 22.60 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4266- 420 -42 187234 06/29/87 2.75 HOOTEN CLEANERS LAUNDRY 10- 4266- 440-44 25.35 + +tt -CKS # #ttt# 187238 06/30/87 24.00 WM H MCCOY GENSUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 56709 187238 06/19/87 32.40 uM H MCCOY GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 53755 56.40 + _ +tt -CKS + #ltt+ 187244 06/19/87 84.00 HAYDEN MURPHY GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504-801 -80 84.00 + 187245 06/30/87 37.20 ROBERT B HILL GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504 - 440 -44 37.20 + t ## -CKS 187248 06/30/87 170.26 HARMON GLASS CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 560 -56 128911 - - 170.26 t - ##t -CKS 187251 06/29/87 4,605.00 HRA CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 271 -04 4,605.00 + # + #+w+ + ++ -CKS 187253 06/30/87 26.50 HUMPHREY RADIATOR -CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 560 -56 26.50 # 187254 06/25/87 75.00 RETAIL DATA SYST MN SERVICES 10 -4201- 500 -50 3 75.00 + _._ ##t -CKS 187256 06/30/87 116.50 ICSI CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 440 -44 189480 ` 116.50 + t #t -CKS t # #tt+ 1987 Y OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 07 -06 -. PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT -•- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. M MESSAGE 187267 06/24/87 214.00 IBM CORPORATION SERVICE CONT 10- 4288 - 510 -51 214.00 * ** -CKS ' 187277 06/19/87 71.80 CARLSON PRINTING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 38491 71.80 ' 187278 06/29/87 14.88 JERRYS FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 440 -44 187278 06/25/87 54.27 JERRYS FOODS REPAIR PARTS 23- 4540 - 613 -61 187278 06/30/87 17.99 JERRYS FOODS CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663 -66 " 87.14 s 187279 06/19/87 54.90 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE CONSTRUCTION 10- 1300 - 182 -03 ' 187279 06/19/87 67.56 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 187279 06/19/87 48.30 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 187279 06/19/87 66.46 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 187279 06/19/87 48.17 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 187279 06/19/87 2.39 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 187279 06/19/87 34.89 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 187279 06/19/87 15.51 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 ` 187279 06/19/87 16.67 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 187279 06/19/87 333.46 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187279 06/19/87 6.15 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 660 -66 ` 187279 06/19/87 32.97 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4514- 520 -52 187279 06/19/87 12.78 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 ' 187279 06/19/87 26.85 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 187279 06/19/67 10.99 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE TOOLS 10 -4580- 646 -64 187279 06/19/87 4.43 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 ° 187279 06/19/87 65.79 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 ` 187279 06/19/87 18.48 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 664 -66 187279 06/19/87 75.33 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 646 -64 187279 06/19/87 13.53 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 ` 187279 06/19/87 10.54 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 187279 06/19/87 182.03 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 187279 06/19/87 43.65 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 187279 06/19/87 14.96 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 187279 06/19/87 8.15 JERRYS OUR OWN HDWE REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 807 -80 z 1,214.94 s *a * * ** * ** -CKS 187286 06/19/87 69.17 JUSTUS LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 4432 187286 06/30/87 40.91 JUSTUS LUMBER TOOLS 10- 4580 - 440 -44 29430 187286 06/23/87 22.78 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 27- 4604- 662 -66 3231 ` 132.86 s * ** -CKS ` 187294 06/24/87 20.00 CRESCENT ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 ' 187294 06/23/87 52.07 CRESCENT ELECTRIC GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 ` 187294 06/25/87 129.49 CRESCENT ELECTRIC GEN SUPPLIES -• -.- 30- 4504 - 782 -78 201.56 s 187296 -- 06/24/87 785.93 TRIARCO ARTS 6 CRAFT GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 233611 - - - -- - - - - -- _ ------ 1987 CITY OF EDINA 472.86 LAWSON CHECK REGISTER GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 07 -06 -87 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT GEN SUPPLIES VENDOR 187317 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. # MESSAGE 187295 06/24/87 745.55 TRIARCO ARTS 6 CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 10- 4588 - 624 -62 233612 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187317 06/30/87 1,531.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 187317 06/23/87 234.23 ****** PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 187317 06/30/87 465.31 LAWSON PRODUCTS r*r -CKS 187300 06/18/87 1,596.10 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 642 -64 rrrrrr 1,596.10 ***-CKS - 187323 06/29/87 5.00 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES **r* ** 5.00 *** -CKS 187304 06/22/87 19.95 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 524025 187304 .06/22/87 32.36 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 523945 187304 06/19/87 98.54 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 515642 187304 06/19/87 15.99 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 229142 187304 06/23/87 90.47 KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 523849 187304 06/30/87 58.57 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 506840 187304 06/26/87 13.89 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 506394 187304 06/24/87 14.03 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 524346 187304 06/22/87 254.73 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 523911 187304 06/19/87 26.99 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 524457 187304 06/23/87 47.33 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 515622 187304 06/19/87 16.99- KNOX LUMBER CO CORRECTION 10- 4604- 646 -64 524457 187304 06/23/87 18.14 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 524054 187304 06/24/87 28.16 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 524351 187304 06/30/87 135.20 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- .646 -64 506579 187304 06/19/87 16.99 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 524457 187304 06-/23" 0-4-2 6 -4b24= 2690 -47 187304 06/30/87 19.40 KNOX LUMBER CO CONT REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 662 -66 506522 187304 06/30/87 41.64 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 506463 187304 06/24/87 70.00 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 506380 187304 06/19/87 227.56 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 515631 187304 06/24/87 177.74 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 506443 187304 06/30/87 104.34 KNOX LUMBER CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 524085 1,699 -28 1,495.03 **s*** *** -CKS 187308 06/25/87 555.00 PARK NIC MED CTR PHY EXAM 10 -4212- 510 -51 555.00 r ****** *** -CKS 187317 06/30/87 472.86 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 187317 06/30/87 355.78 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 =4504- 325 -30 187317 06/23/87 534.04 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 646 -64 187317 06/30/87 221.82 LAWSON PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187317 06/30/87 150.74 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 187317 06/23/87 234.23 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 187317 06/30/87 465.31 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 2,434.78 r rrrrrr ***-CKS - 187323 06/29/87 5.00 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 10- 4508 - 440 -44 119794, 5.00 .. 1987 Y OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187324 06/19/87 187325 06/23/87 187325 06/19/87 GEN SUPPLY LONG LAKE FORD TRACT 187329 06/30/87 # # # * *# 187331 06/19/87 > # # # # ## 187343 06/19/87 187344 06/29/87 ' 187344 06/29/87 187344 06/29/87 187344 06/29/87 187344 06/29/87 187346 06/24/87 # # # # ## 187351 06/30/87 # # ## ## 187358 06/23/87 187359 06/30/87 187359 06/30/87 187359 06/30/87 187359 r 06/23/87 AMOUNT 1,741.66 2,027.55 1,856.37 1,902.39 242.02 242.02 242.03 8,254.04 * 176.62 125.88 302.50 * 1,715.00 1,715.00 + 2,895.00 2,895.00 + 145.51 145.51 + 125.25 74.65 33.42 18.14 14.19 265.65 + 217,752.34 217,752.34 515.48 515.48 60.00 60.00 + 132.23 21.44 103.48 1.51 CHEC1 ,ISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LOGIS COMPUTER BILLING LONG LAKE FORD TRACT GEN SUPPLY LONG LAKE FORD TRACT REPAIR PARTS LAYNE MINNESOTA CO CONT REPAIRS LAHASS CORPORATION CONT REPAIRS MINNESOTA GLOVE MED OXYGEN R EQUIP MED OXYGEN d EQUIP MED OXYGEN R EQUIP MED OXYGEN & EQUIP MED OXYGEN d EQUIP MET N WASTE C L COMM MILSCO ENGINEERING NATL GUARDIAN SYST MINN TORO INC MINN TORO INC MINN TORO INC MINN TORO INC GEN SUPPJLIES EQUIP MAINT EQUIP MAINT 1ST AID SUPPLY 1ST AID SUPPLIES 1ST AID SUPPLY SEWER METERS REPAIR PARTS ALARM SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 07 -06 -, PAGE 11 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 8 MESSAGE 10- 4233 - 160 -16 10- 4233 - 200 -20 10- 4233 - 420 -42 40- 4233 - 800 -80 50- 4233 - 820 -82 50- 4233 - 840 -84 50- 4233 - 860 -86 10- 4504 - 646 -64 053751 10 -4540- 560 -56 053086 40 -4248- 801 -80 15355 40- 4248- 808 -80 B39495 10- 4504 - 560 -56 13365 10 -4274- 440 -44 10- 4274 - 440 -44 10- 4510 - 440 -44 10- 4510 - 440 -44 10- 4510-440 -44 40- 4312 - 812 -80 4319 10- 4540 - 646 -64 11987 50- 4304 - 821 -82 15279 10 -4504- 646 -64 664298 10- 4540 - 560 -56 663788 10- 4540 - 560 -56 663784 10- 4540- 560 -56 662730 * ** -CKS * *+ -CKS * ** -CKS ` * +* -CKS * ** -CKS ` *** -CKS , 1987 CITY OF EDINA INC CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 187359 06/23/87 83.63 187359 06/24/87 581.00 187359 06/29/87 3,502.44 187359 06/24/87 12.98 187359 06/24/87 106.19 187359 06/25/87 232.50 187359 06/25/87 12.98 187359 06/25/87 17.76 187359 06/25/87 30.98 187359 06/24/87 68.58 MINN TORO 4,907.70 # 187360 06/30/87 5.50 187360 06/23/87 45.50 187360 06/24/87 1,857.00 GEN SUPPLY 1,908.00 # # # # # ## 187362 06/19/87 178.90 187362 06/18/87 213.05 187362 06/22/87 1,001.55 1,393.50 # # # # # ## 187370 06/23/87 164.94 187370 06/23/87 164.94 187370 06/24/87 63.48 393.36 187379 06/24/87 150.00 187379 06/30/87 31.50 181.50 • # # # # ## 187381 06/23/87 283.00 187381 06/22/87 84.90 367.90 + :::*3:: 06/18/87 8,331.22 8,331.22 • 187391 06/30/87 50,000.00 50,000.00 # # # # # ## 187413 06%30/87 407.09 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC EQUIP REPLACE MINN TORO INC GEN SUPPLIES MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLIES MINNESOTA WANNER GEN SUPPLY 07 -06 -87 PAGE 12 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4540 - 560 -56 662571 10- 4901 - 650 -65 662713 27- 4504 - 666 -66 664680 27-4540- 664 -66 661628 27- 4540 - 664 -66 662474 27- 4540 - 664 -66 663516 27- 4540 - 664 -66 663797 27- 4540 - 664 -66 663961 27- 4540 - 664 -66 663796 27- 4540 - 664 -66 662041 10- 4504-646 -64 066638 10- 4504 - 646 -64 066583 10- 4504 - 648 -64 066285 MODEL STONE COMPANY CNCRETE 10- 4528- 314 -30 2058 MODEL STONE COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 3717 MODEL STONE COMPANY CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 704 -70 MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONT REPAIRS MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO CONT REPAIRS MIDLAND PRODUCTS CO REPAIR PARTS METRO FONE COMM EQUIP MAINT METRO FONE COMM GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4248 - 646 -64 4810 26- 4248 - 683 -68 4810 26- 4540 - 683 -68 4850 n 10- 4274- 420 -42 40 -4504- 801 -80 246205 STAR 6 TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 510 -51 STAR & TRIBUNE ADVERTISING 10- 4212- 510 -51 MPLS COMP TREAS WATER 40- 4640- 803 -80 N.S.P. COMPANY CONSTRUCTION i NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 60- 1300 - 265 -04 27- 4504- 662 -66 # ## -CKS # ## -CKS # ## -CKS # ## -CKS # ## -CKS # ## -CKS # ## -CKS 1987 Y OF EDINA CHECK, :ISTER 07 -06- PAGE 13 r CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE ' 187413 06/30/87 25.44 NATIONWIDE PAPERS GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 662 -66 - 432.53 # * ** -CKS 187417 06/24/87 287.80 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 27970 ' 187417 06/24/87 322.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10-4600- 420 -42 27999 609.80 *r* *** *** -CKS 187421 06/23/87 126.22 OLSON CHAIN 9 CABLE TOOLS 10- 4580 - 646 -64 3311 ' 187421 06/24/87 14.74 OLSON CHAIN 6 CABLE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 664 -66 3406 187421 06/19/87 230.30 OLSON CHAIN d CABLE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504- 664 -66 3309 187421 06/24/87 7.47 OLSON CHAIN d CABLE REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 3570 378.73 * ` ' r*** ** * **-CKS 187429 06/18/87 176.50 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 176.50 *** -CKS • 187439 06/22/87 212.80 PRIOR LAKE AG CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 004 -20 212.80 r • * * * # #* *** -CKS ` 187448 06/22/87 217.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 40- 4600 - 800 -80 r 217.00 r 187449 06/30/87 477.68 PFC EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540-805 -80 69047 r 477.68 * **** *r *** -CKS 187452 06/30/87 108.96 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 17480 108.96 Y ** * *** *** -CKS 187462 06/19/87 35.00 RENTAL EQUIP 6 SALES EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 301 -30 5675 187462 06/19/87 65.70 RENTAL EQUIP Q SALES GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504 - 644 -64 5499 187462 06/30/87 24.00 RENTAL EQUIP 6 SALES REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 5920 187462 06/30/87 343.96 RENTAL EQUIP d SALES REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 5946 187462 06/30/87 57.25 RENTAL EQUIP d SALES TOOLS 10- 4580- 644 -64 5837 525.91 r \ *** -CKS 187465 06/24/87 263.00 RICHFIELD PLUMB & CO CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 9855 187465 06/23/87 104.95 RICHFIELD PLUMB -6 CO - GEN SUPPLIES----- -- - - -- 28- 4504 - 702 -70 3609 187465 06/23/87 22.50 RICHFIELD PLUMB 6 CO GEN SUPPLY 28- 4504 - 702 -70 3582 390.45 * \ s � 1987 CITY OF EDINA 07 -06 -87 PAGE 14 CHECK'REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. U MESSAGE * ** -CKS 187469 06/30/87 25.06 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 187469 06/23/87 24.29 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 M34911 187469 06/23/87 78.64 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 M32105 187469 06/30/87 85.64 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 187469 06/30/87 306.08 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 519.71 + * ** -CKS 187472 06/23/87 34.20 ROTO ROOTER CNT REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 25686 - 34.20 + * * * * ** * ** -CKS 187480 06/22/87 174.75 RTW INC INSURANCE 10- 4260- 510 -51 174.75 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 187482 06/30/87 50.00 SATELLITE INDUSTRIES CONT REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 50.00 + * * * * ** * ** -CKS 187484 06/25/87 87.48 AMERICAN SHARECOM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 87.48 * ** * ** * ** -CKS d 187486 06/24/87 72.00 DON STREICHER GUNS SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642- 420 -42 M41370 72.00 i rR * * * * ** * ** -CKS ; 187490 06/30/87 105.22 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 105.22 + e * ** -CKS 187492 06/19/87 65.15 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 147763 C 187492 06/23/87 30.43 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 146213 187492 06/23/87 150.99 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 148169 187492 06/23/87 78.54 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 148418 187492 - 06/29/87 29.64 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 148459 354.75 + * ** -CKS 187502 06/19/87 267.79 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 73920 187502• . - 06/23/87 12.54 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS - - -- - - • 10- 4540-560 -56 74480 187502 06/23/87 15.06 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 74376 187502 06/30/87 12.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 74905 __ z.. .•,.m >,....,7_7,7 ..- ..,� --. - t ___� ...... . ....... -- , 1987 Y OF EDINA CHECK .ISTER 07 -06 -. PAGE 15 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 187502 06/19/87 20.63 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 74163 328.62 + 187503 06/18/87 54.91 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187503 06/24/87 24.49 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187503 06/29/87 146.83 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187503 06/18/87 25.80 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 187503 06/29/87 181.76 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 187503 06/24/87 40.56 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 646 -64 187503 06/23/87 35.38 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 803 -80 509.73 + :8*::*0: * ** -CKS 06/24/87 161.83 SUN ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 187505 06/25/87 91.80 SUN ADVERTISING 10 -4210- 140 -14 253.63 tt * * ** * ** -CKS 187508 06/30/87 3.72 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 5042 187508 06/30/87 11.00 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 440 -44 6596 187508 06/24/87 53.61 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 23 -4516- 611 -61 20289 187508 06/19/87 66.05 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30 -4516- 781 -78 31939 187508 06/25/87 35.76 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 5165 187508 06/22/87 73.24 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516- 781 -78 18332 187508 06/19/87 23.32 ST PAUL BOOK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 6457 266.70 + + + + + ++ *** -CKS 187516 06/25/87 128.78- SEARS ROEBUCK CREDIT 10- 4580- 301 -30 187516 06/19/87 667.45 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 103831 187516 06/25/87 261.50 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 27- 4580 - 664 -66 187516 06/25/87 261.50 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 27 -4580- 667 -66 187516 06/25/87 261.50- SEARS ROEBUCK CORRECTION 27- 4580 - 667 -66 187516 06/30/87 317.98 SEARS ROEBUCK TOOLS 40- 4580 - 801 -80 68502 1,118.15 t * *t * +* * **-CKS 187525 06/19/87 288.98 3 M CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 288.98 t 187526 06/23/87 1,306.40 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 46095 187526 06/25/87 1,620.07 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 460960 187526 06/25/87 1,740.06- TRACY OIL CORRECTION 10- 4612- 560 -56 460940 187526 06/25/87 1,740.06 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 460940 187526 06/25/87 1,740.06 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 460940 187526 06/30/87 2,790.07 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 187526 06/25/87 1,392.05 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10- 4612- 560 -56 460970 8,848.65 1g�5�] 204.25 TAYLOR SALES CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 187527 06/23/87 11.50 TAYLOR SALES CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 269146 - 1}- 5r6- -► M 215.75 Y 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION :::*S:: 06/30/87 474.85 TEXGAS CORP GEN SUPPLIES 187530 06/23/87 321.00 TEXGAS CORP GEN SUPPLIES 187530 06/19/87 32.85 TEXGAS CORP GASOLINE 828.70 w 187531 06/24/87 390.60 AMMONIA HOUSE GEN SUPPLIES 390.60 w ssswrs 187537 06/24/87 1,177.20 TRI STATE DRILLING CONT REPAIRS 1,177.20 r :::*S:: 06/19/67 92.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY GEN SUPPLIES 187539 06/23/87 34.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER 187539 06/23/87 145.50 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER 271.50 s wwwwww 187541 06/24/87 59.98 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 187541 06/24/87 37.00 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 187541 06/24/87 22.41 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 187541 06/24/87 19.98 TARGET GEN SUPP 187541 06/24/87 99.96 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 187541 06/24/87 43.51 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 187541 06/29/87 113.47 TARGET PHOTO SUPPLIES 396.31 s rwrwws 187545 06/30/87 225.70 TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARTS 225.70 s wsswww 187550 06/30/87 25.30 TISDEL STANDARD REPAIR PARTS 25.30 w rswrww 187551 06/25/87 5, 527.35 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 187551' 06/25/87 663.10 (6461.40)U.NIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 1875$1 187SSJ 06/25/87 270.95 UNITED U 9 GEN SUPPLIES 06/23/87 90.65 b, 552"0S--* UYITED ELEC'1 IC CORP REPAIR PARTS rssrrr 187564 06/23/87 29.50 VAUGHNS GEN SUPPLTFR 07 -06 -87 PAGE 16 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE wrs -CKS 10- 4504- 133 -12 10- 4504- 301 -30 49017 30 -4612- 782 -78 47794 28- 4504 - 704 -70 014044 srr -CKS 26 -4248- 682 -68 72183 rww -CKS 27- 4504 - 664 -66 19276 27- 4558- 664 -66 19434 27- 4558 - 664 -66 sws -CKS 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4508 - 440 -44 sws -CKS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 23007 10- 4540 - 560 -56 13066 10- 4266- 420 -42 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 470 -47 10- 4540 - 646 -64 30- 4504 - 782 -78 157344 ssw -CKS ssr -CKS rss -CKS 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE + + + +•• MID CENTRAL INC 187572 - 06/29/87 MID CENTRAL INC GEN SUPPLIES ' 187575 06/23/87 187575 06/30/87 * + **** ' 187578 06/24/87 187578 06/30/87 187579 06/19/87 187579 06/30/87 ' 187579 06/19/87 - 187579 06/19/87 187579 06/19/87 ' 187579 06/23/87 187582 06/29/87 ' 187582 06/22/87 187582 06/23/87 ' 187586 06/23/87 187586 06/23/87 187586 06/18/87 ' 187586 06/23/87 187592 06/24/87 ' 187592 06/24/87 - 187592 06/30/87 187593 06/25/87 187593 06/25/87 - - 187603 06/19/87 AMOUNT 29.50 + 303.90 303.90 • 45.50 399.12 444.62 900.00 122.34 1,022.34 + 36.43 36.35 356.57 217.92 106.56 147.49 901.32 + 286.82 211.79 220.47 719.08 78.38 76.22- 14.50 150.08 166.74 • CHECK ,STER 07 -06 -8. AGE 17 .VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION- -- ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE * ** -CKS VAN PAPER CO PAPER SUPPLIES-- - 10- 4514 - 520 -52 56639 WATER PRODUCTS WATER PRODUCTS WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC WM.H.ZIEGLER CO INC WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE WILLIAMS STEEL -HDWE GORDON SMITH CO GORDON SMITH CO GORDON SMITH CO W W GRAINGER W W GRAINGER W W GRAINGER W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GEN SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GEN SUPPLIES GEN SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS PARTS TOOLS GASOLINE GASOLINE GASOLINE REPAIR PARTS CREDIT CONT REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS 254.08 MID CENTRAL INC GEN SUPPLIES 605.08 MID CENTRAL INC GEN SUPPLIES 125.00 MID CENTRAL INC EQUIP REP 984.16 * 47.50 MINNESOTA CLAY COMMODITIES - -- 10.70 MINNESOTA CLAY COMMODITIES 58.20 * 40- 4540- 803 -80 039614 40- 4540 - 803 -80 039861 10- 4504 - 345 -30 461023 10- 4540 - 560 -56 10- 4504 - 301 -30 10- 4504 - 318 -30 10- 4620- 560 -56 10- 4620- 560 -56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 40- 4580 - 801 -80 82755 27- 4612- 664 -66 1120 27- 4612- 664 -66 27- 4612- 664 -66 1060 10- 4540- 520 -52 10- 4540 - 560 -56 26- 4248-682 -68 50- 4540 - 841 -84 10- 4504 - 646 -64 001380 10- 4504 - 648 -64 001256 10- 4901 - 440 -44 001411 23- 4624 - 613 -61 03209 23- 4624- 613 -61 03210 29.13 •- WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY --- REPAIR PARTS - - 27- 4540 - 666 -66 • ** -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. # MESSAGE 29.13 * * * * ** * ** -CKS 187612 06/30/87 33.09 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 301 -30 10429 187612 06/30/87 390.88 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 314 -30 10429 423.97 1876.13 06/30/87 1,464.10 MCNEILUS STEEL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 648 -64 62377 1,464.10 + * * * * ** *** -CKS 187705 06/23/87 80.45 MARINE RESCUE PROD SAFETY EQUIP 26- 4642- 681 -68 2084 187705 06/19/87 115.65 MARINE RESCUE PROD GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 196.10 187706 06/23/87 96.00 POOLS INC CONT REPAIRS 26 -4248- 682 -68 28659 187706 06/24/87 8.80 POOLS INC GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 28572 187706 06/29/87 19.50 POOLS INC GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 28700 187706 06/19/87 38.25 POOLS INC GEN SUPPLIES 30 -4504- 783 -78 28599 187706 06/19/87 160.90' POOLS INC CHEMICALS 30- 4564- 783 -78 28570 323.45 + 187707 06/19/87 220.00 RICHARD ERICKSON CONT SERVICE 30- 4201 - 781 -78 220.00 187708 06/18/87 80.00 ANTHONY HAUSER CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 80.00 • 187709 06/18/87 100.00 JIM TARKELSON CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 100.00 * 187710 06/18/87 150.00 CAROL CHRISTENSEN CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 150.00 * 187711 06/18/87 125.00 ELLEN ROSEWALE CONT SERV 30 -4201- 781 -78 125.00 187712 06/19/87 127.30 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 301 -30 187712 06/19/87 .42.43 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 440 -44 187712 06/19/87 63.65 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 520 -52 187712 06/19/87 .127.30 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 540-54 187712 06/19/87 96.58 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 645 -64 187712 06/19/87 53.03 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 10- 4250 - 645 -64 187712 06/19/87 10.60 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 23- 4250 - 612 -61 187712 06/19/87 76.44 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 26- 4250 - 682 -68 187712 06/19/87 183.75 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250 - 662 -66 187712 06/19/87 47.33 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 27- 4250 - 664 -66 187712 06/19/87 127.40 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 28- 4250 - 702 -70 187712 06/19/87 458.28 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 30- 4250-782 -78 187712 06/19/87 225.40 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 841 -84 187712 06/19/87 - 225.40 WASTE MANAGEMENT REFUSE COLLECTION 50- 4250 - 861 -86 1,864.89 187713 06/18/87 30.00 BOB CONNOLLY SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187714 187715 187716 187717 187718 187719 187720 * * * * ** 187722 187723 187723 187723 187723 187723 187723 187723 187724 187725 187725 187725 187725 187726 187727 187727 187727 187728 06/18/87 06/18/87 06/18/87 06/18/87 06/18/87 06/18/87 06/18/87 AMOUNT 30.00 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 * 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 25.00 25.00 80.00 80.00 50.00 50.00 CHECK VENDOR SHARON MCKISSON HELEN ZABEL MOLLIE PAULSON BILL DIETRICHSON KATHY GUSTAFSON MARION ALSTAD FRANK EVANS ISTER 07 -06 -8. .,AGE 19 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE SERVICES 30- 4201- 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 * * * -CKS 06/18/87 55.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 55.00 06/23/87 183.50 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 ` 06/25/87 459.55 NERCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 31244 06/18/87 538.96 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 06/23/87 164.60 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 31022 06/23/87 464.10 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 31021 06/24/87 183.50 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 30801 06/23/87 266.70 NEBCO DIST INC CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 30940 2,260.91 * 06/18/87 38.72 B -R WHOLESALE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 5940 ` 38.72 * 06/24/87 62.67 SUPERIOR PLASTIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 12362 ` 06/25/87 66.87 SUPERIOR PLASTIC CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 11909 06/25/67 31.02 SUPERIOR PLASTIC CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248 - 682 -68 11650 06/18/87 17.86 SUPERIOR PLASTIC CONT REPAIRS 26- 4248- 682 -68 12185 178.42 * 06/16/87 51.50 AIR POWER EQUIPMENT CONT REPAIR 26- 4248 - 682 -68 30955 51.50 * 06/18/87 44.75- DANS REGISTER SERV CORRECTION 26- 4201 - 681 -68 06/18/87 44.75 DANS REGISTER SERV SERVICES 26 -4201- 681 -68 06/18/87 44.75 DANS REGISTER SERV SERVICES 26- 4201- 682 -68 44.75 06/18/87 189.90 CYLINDER CITY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 4887 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE 189.90 + 187729 06/26/87 33.56 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 187729 06/26/87 5.98 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GEN SUPPLIES •10- 4504 - 646 -64 81668 187729 06/19/87 81.03 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GEHN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 82550 120.57 + 187730 06/19/87 147.00 STEWART LUMBER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 85188 147.00 + 187731 06/19/87 48.00 HERB DECKER LETTERING 10 -4248- 560 -56 48.00 + 187732 06/19/87 69.58 K & K DOOR SYSDTEMS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 53198 69.58 + 187733 06/19/87 65.10 THE FITNESS STORE GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 783 -78 9657 65.10 + 187734 06/22/87 38.00 WOODY WHATELY SERVICES 10- 4504- 133 -12 38.00 + 187735 06/19/87 375.00 NICK GEREBI CONT SEERVICES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 375.00 + 187736 06/22/87 300.00 KEN GEREBI SERVICES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 300.00 + 187737 06/22/87 60.00 DICK HAYS SERVICES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 60.00 + 187738 06/22/87 25.00 TC MUSICIANS UNION SERVICES 30- 4224 - 781 -78 25.00 + 187739 06/22/87 286.42 VANTAGE ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646-64 9800 286.42 + 187740 06/23/87 660.00 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 7450 187740 06/23/87 264.00 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 683 768 7438 187740 06/23/87 198.00 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 7435 187740 06/22/87 142.00 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN CONCESSIONS- 26- 4624- 683 -68 7415 1,264.00 + 187741 06/22/87 371.00 EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOC REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4600- 627 -62 371.00 + 187742 06/22/87 100.00 SAVORY S GREENHOUSE TREES 10- 4560- 644 -64 100.00 + 187743 06/22/87 152.16 LINCOLN DEL COMMODITIES 10- 4500 - 600 -60 152.16 + 187744 06/26/87 - 23.00 AMERICAN BAKERIES - CONCESSIONS - 26- 4624- 683 -68 187744 06/22/87. 11.50 AMERICAN BAKERIES '. CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 187744 06/23/87 11.50 AMERICAN BAKERIES CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 1987 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 46.00 07 -06 -8. .,AGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. A MESSAGE 187745 06/22/87 240.00 NORTH HENNEPIN GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 240.00 * 187746 06/22/87 41.25 VANS INC GEN SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 611 -61 41.25 * 187747 06/22/87 47.88 ROTO ROOTER CON REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 29303 187747 06/22/87 92.34 ROTO ROOTER CON REPAIRS 30- 4248 - 782 -78 24500 140.22 * 187748 06/19/87 119.16 GORDON HUGHES REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4202 - 140 -14 119.16 * 187749 06/19/87 37,497.00 INTERN TRUCK INC EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 305 -30 01849 37,497.00 * 187750 06/19/87 1,170.00 MN TREE INC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 390 -30 2773 1,170.00 * * * * * ** 187752 06/23/87 446.07 DELTA FOREMOST CHEM CLEANING SUPPLY 27- 4512 - 663 -66 336434 446.07 * 187753 06/23/87 1,728.00 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSN COMP HANDICAP 27- 3470 - 000 -00 1,728.00 * 187754 06/23/87 48.83 VIRGIL JOHNSON SERVICSES 10- 4208 - 184 -18 48.83 * 187755 06/23/87 4,130.00 LAKE RESTORATION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 358 -30 7701 4,130.00 * 187756 06/23/87 19.50 RUTH SCHMOLL REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4266- 440 -44 19.50 * 187757 06/23/87 14.50 GOPHER BEARING GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 14.50 * 187758 06/23/87 57.10 EIDE SAW SERVICE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 36020 57.10 * 187759 06/23/87 40.23 VESSCO INC REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 805 -80 3444 40.23 * 187760 06/23/87 112.10 SCHAEFER EQUIPMENT GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 314 -30 133215 -187760 --- 06/30787- HAEFER- "EQUIPMENT TOOLS - 0= 301- 30- 133215-- 1'E4.EO -* 187761 06/23/87 39.90 E H RENNER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 20702 39.90 * 187762 06/23/87 453.00 MOBIL COMMUNICATION REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 03 * * * -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187762 06/23/87 187762 06/23/87 187763 06/23/87 187764 06/23/87 187765 06/23/87 187766 06/23/87 187767 06/23/87 187768 06/23/87 187768 06/23/87 187768 06/23/87 187769 06/23/87 187770 06/30/87 187770 06/30/87 187770 06/24/87 187771 06/24/87 187772 06/24/87 187773 06/24/87 167773 06/25/87 187773 06/25/87 187774 06/30/87 187774 06/24/87 187775 06/24/87 187776 06/24/87 187777 06/24/87 CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 22 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 469.50 MOBIL COMMUNICATION REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 03531 469.50 MOBIL COMMUNICATION REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540-801 -80 03532 1,392.00 * 982.30 ARPS TREE SERVICE SERVICES 10- 4201- 644 -64 982.30 * 2.02 BLOOMINGTON DODGE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- S60 -56 64249 2.02 * 4,383.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE SERVICES 10- 4201 - 358 -30 4,383.00 * 60.00 SUBURBAN PARATRANSIT REIMBURSEMENT 10 -1132- 000-00 60.00 * 100.00 CUSTOM VIDEO MAKERS DONATIONS 23- 3265- 000 -00 100.00 * 12.50 MINNESOTA JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 820 -82 12.50 MINNESOTA JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50- 4214 - 840 -84 12.50 MINNESOTA JAYCEES ADVERTISING 50 -4214- 860 -86 37.50 * 75.00 DARLYNE EDMAN SERVICES 27 -4201- 662 -66 75.00 * 125.98 WATER TREATING CO CONT REPAIRS 26 -4248- 682 -68 5311 75.60 WATER TREATING CO GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 5322 33.80 WATER TREATING CO GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504- 682 -68 235.38 * 204.48 XEROX CORP SERVICE CONTRACTS 10 -4288- 510 -51 204.48 390.00 METRO SR FEDERATION ADVERTISING 10- 4212 - 510 -51 390.00 * 223.30 RUBENSTEIN 6 ZIFF CRAFT SUPPLYL 23- 4588 - 611 -61 101.88 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF COST OF COMM 23- 4624- 613 -61 204.88 RUBENSTEIN 6 ZIFF COST OF COMM 23- 4624 - 613 -61 530.06 * 500.00 CUSTOM FIRE EQUIP REPLACEMENT - 10- 4901- 440 -44 001672 77,850.00 CUSTOM FIRE EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 440 -44 001671 78,350.00 * 324.00 ACT ELECTRONICS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -26 6059 324.00 * 387.00 CLEAN FLO LAB INC INDIAHEAD LAKE 10 -2242- 000 -00 4056 387.00 475.00 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CONST 60- 1300 - 265 -04 475.00 * 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187778 06/24/87 187779 06/24/87 187779 06/24/87 187780 06/24/87 187780 06/24/87 ' 187781 06/24/87 187782 06/24/87 ' 187783 06/24/87 187784 06/24/87 187784 06/24/87 s 187785 06/24/87 ' 187786 06/24/87 y 187787 06/24/87 187788 06/24/87 187788 06/24/87 ' 187788 06/24/87 ' 187789 06/23/87 ' 187790 06/23/87 ' 187791 06/23/87 187792 06/23/87 ' 187793 06/23/87 ' I 187794 06/23/87 CHECK ISTER 07 -06 -8. .'AGE 23 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 20.00 ANN BARBER REFUND 10- 1145 - 000 -00 20.00 * 16.95 MCGRAW HILL BOOK CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 29.95 MCGRAW HILL BOOK CO OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 46.90 * 14.00 TRUSTEE MPTF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 185.00 TRUSTEE MPTF SERVICES 30 -4201- 781 -78 199.00 * 25.00 VFW POST 1296 CLEANING REIM 10 -4504- 133 -12 25.00 * 25.00 MIKE SHAPIRO PERFORMANCE 10- 4504 - 133 -12 25.00 * 42.32 R & R SPECIALTIES INC. GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 42.32 * 100.00 CONSUMER CARPET SERVICES 23 -4120- 612 -61 79.80 CONSUMER CARPET SERVICES 23- 4120- 612 -61 179.80 * 36.77 FME CORP POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 36.77 16.95 MARK ANDERSON REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 490 -49 16.95 * 80.00 JO PROVO TAYLOR REIMBURSEMENT 10 -4202- 490 -49 80.00 * 8.00- CARL SHANNON CORRECTION - 10 -4202- 490 -49 8.00 CARL SHANNON REIMBURSEMENT 10 -4202- 490 -49 80.00 CARL SHANNON SCHOOL 10 -4202- 490 -49 80.00 * 44.75 AFFILIATED SERV AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 44.75 * 570.53 RAINBOW LEASING CONT SERV 10- 4200- 507 -50 570.53 * - 210.00 JERRY$ LANDSCAPE CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248 - 841 -84 5176 210.00 * _ 44.50 ROOT 0 MATIC CONT REPARIS 10 -4248- 520 -52 44.50 88.45 ACTION RENTAL CTR CLEANING SUPPLY 10- 4512 - 520 -52 88.45 * 114.00 GRANDMAS CUPBOARD CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187795 187796 187797 187798 187799 187800 187801 187802 187803 187804 187806 187807 187807 187807 187808 187809 187810 187811 187812 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/23/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 06/24/87 AMOUNT 114.00 • 285.00 285.00 * 60.00 60.00 * 44.775 44.75 * 200.00 200.00 * 110.00 110.00 * 50.00 50.00 * 300.00 300.00 * 21.40 21.40 * 81.00 81.00 * 149.00 149.00 * 215.36 215.36 * 531.50 960.50 531.50 2,023.50 * 275.00 275.00 * 245.00 245.00 * 18.00 18.00 36.00 36.00 52.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION BECKY PRASCIUNAS ROSEANN GAMBUCCI MILWAUKEE ELECT TOOL DAVID KEVIAT MARGOT PACKER ALICE BLOCK SCOTT RATZKAFF DAVID RADATZ TOTEPAK CO DUANE NIELSEN VERSATILE VEHICLE VIKING LAB INC VIKING LAB INC VIKING LAB INC HELMUTH BIELKE KC GROVES EILEEN BIERBAUM MARGUERITE DEMARSH ANNE HILDEBRAND REFUND REFUND CONT REPAIRS SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SERVICES SCHOOL REPAIR PARTS SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS CHEMICALS CHEMICALS AMBULANCE REFUND TREE REMOVED REFUND REFUND REFUND 07 -06 -87 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 28- 4201 - 702 -70 28 -4201- 702 -70 10 -4248- 646 -64 30 -4201- 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 10- 4504 - 133 -12 10- 4208 - 440 -44 27- 4540 - 666 -66 7204 26- 4201- 682 -68 1124 27 -4540- 665 -66 841 26- 4564- 682 -68 16590 26- 4564 - 682 -68 16733 26- 4564 - 682 -68 16781 10- 3180 - 000 -00 10- 4200 - 353 -30 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 * * * -CKS 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187813 06/24/87 187814 06/24/87 187815 06/24/87 187815 06/24/87 187816 06/24/87 187817 06/24/87 187818 06/24/87 ' 187819 06/24/87 ' 187820 06/24/87 ' 187821 06/24/87 187822 06/24/87 187823 06/24/87 187823 06/24/87 187823 06/24/87 187823 06/24/87 187823 06/24/87 187824 06/24/87 187825 06/24/87 187826 06/24/87 187826 06/24/87 187827 06/24/87 187826 i 06/24/87 CHECK .ISTER 07 -06 -8. .,AGE 25 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. M MESSAGE 52.00 18.00 JOANN STROMBERG REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 18.00 s 336.00 CHEMSEARCH CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 646 -64 336.00 + 390.05 MIDLAND NURSERY INC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 646 -64 6443 48.00 MIDLAND NURSERY INC CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 646 -64 6424 438.05 w 87.50 LINDENFELSER RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 646 -64 005840 87.50 ; 18.00 JENNIFER J ULMER REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 18.00 • 18.00 JOHN BORG REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 18.00 18.00 SARAH LUND REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 18.00 • 20.00 JAN BORDANARO REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 20.00 • 36.00 SHIRLEE HOLMES REFUND 10- 3500- 000 -00 36.00 • 533.00 LOWELL MCCARTHY CONT SALARY 10- 4105 - 624 -62 533.00 w 72.12 EDINBOROUGH PARK SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 133 -12 6.98 EDINBOROUGH PARK ZAMBONI SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 5.81 EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES 30 -4512- 782 -78 33.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 12.20 EDINBOROUGH PARK SIGNS 30- 4600- 781 -78 130.11 280.90 MOTOROLA EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 280.90 150.00 DEPT OF PUBLIC ROOM 6 BOARD -- 10- 426.8- 420 -42 870287 ' 150.00 • 43.00 SHERIFFS DEPT EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 491.71 SHERIFFS DEPT ROOM d BOARD 10- 4286 - 220 -22 534.71 • 117.00 MPH INDUSTRIES INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 26127 117.00 210.00 NERMFLEX INC BILLING ACCT 10 -4200- 160 -16 210.00 w 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187829 06/24/87 CORRECTION 28 -4248- 612 -61 187831 06/25/87 187832 06/25/87 187832 06/25/87 187832 06/25/87 187832 06/25/87 187832 06/26/87 187833 06/25/87 187833 06/25/87 187834 06/25/87 187835 06/25/87 187836 06/25/87 187837 06/25/87 187838 06/25/87 187839 06/25/87 187839 06/29/87 187840 06/25/87 187841 06/29/87 187841 06/26/87 187841 06/29/87 187842 06/26/87 187843 06/$6/87 187844 06/26/87 s AMOUNT 49.50 49.50 • 357.00 357.00 • 144.90 289.80- 144.90 144.90 44.85 189.75 • 60.75 8.47 69.22 • 136.14 136.14 • 371.00 371.00 • 65.00 65.00 • 443.58 443.58 • 34.39 34.39 • 3,943.00 5,543.00 9,486.00 • 169.14 169.14 • 43.50 70.00 73.50 187.00 • 108.35 108.35 • 142.42 142.42 • 100.00 100.00 • CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 26 4 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. Y MESSAGE STATE OF. MINNESOTA LIC PLATE 10- 4642- 420 -42 CAREER LEE D C HEY COMPANY D C HEY COMPANY D C HEY COMPANY D C HEY COMPANY D C HEY COMPANY JOYCE REPYA JOYCE REPYA EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN MN DEPT OF NATURAL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSN CITY OF RICHFIELD TIMS TREE SERVICE TIM$ TREE SERVICE ERIC FELTON AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN RED CROSS AMERICAN RED CROSS CAMPION CATERING MIDWEST CHEMICALS JULIE DIERAUER LAUNDRY 27- 4262- 663 -66 027524 CONT REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612-61 45846 CORRECTION 28 -4248- 612 -61 45846 CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 612 -61 45846 CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248 - 612 -61 45846 GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 035577 LICENSE PLATES 10- 4310 - 560 -56 V -MC BLADE 10- 4504 - 646 -64 REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4504 - 623 -62 REIMBURSEMENT 10- 4600- 627 -62 SAFETY INST 10- 3500 - 000 -00 SIGNS 29- 4504 - 722 -72 POWER 10 -4252- 345 -30 CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 644 -64 CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 644 -64 CABLE TV 10 -2149- 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 625 -62 28194 GEN SUPPLIES - 10- 4504 - 625 -62 28604 GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 625 -62 28179 DINNERS 10- 4206 - 140 -14 CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 520 -52 WINNER ART SHOW 23 -3265- 000 -00 ••• -CKS 1987 OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187845 06/26/87 187846 06/26/87 187847 06/26/87 187848 06/26/87 187849 06/26/87 J 187850 06/26/87 187851 06/26/87 187852 06/26/87 187853 06/26/87 187854 06/26/87 187855 06/26/87 187856 06/26/87 * * * * ** 812.65- ' 187858 06/29/87 187859 06/29/87 ' 187860 06/29/87 187860 06/29/87 187861 06/29/87 187862 - 06/29/87 187862 06/29/87 ' 187862 06/29/87 CHECK LSTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 100.00 TOM TYLER WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * MIDWEST FENCE 1,550.00 * 27 -4201- 662 -66 9177 100.00 BONNIE GOLDBLATT WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 1,215.41 50.00 PAUL BENSON WINNER ART SHOW 50.00 * PIP PRINTING -••- -- 812.65- 50.00 GEORGE TAPLEY WINNER ART SHOW 50.00 * 100.00 CY TURNBLADH WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 MONICA FOGG WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 BETTY CATER WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 DAVID KORTE WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 STANLEY KRONICK WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 ANDREA MOORE WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 100.00 VIRGINIA THOMPSON WINNER ART SHOW 100.00 * 17.05 PETER SPOKES . REFRESHMENTS 17.05 * 155.00 CITY OF PHOENIX 155.00 * UNIFORM ALLOW 27 -4262- 663 -66 11550.00 MIDWEST FENCE 1,550.00 * 27 -4201- 662 -66 9177 UNIFORM ALLOWENCE - - - -- 402.76 JOE GRUEPNER 812.65 JOE GRUEPNER 1,215.41 75.00 LOLA EDMAN 75.00 812.65 PIP PRINTING -••- -- 812.65- PIP PRINTING 25.90 PIP PRINTING 07 -06 -8. AGE 27 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. # MESSAGE 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265 - 000-00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 TRAINING TAPES 10- 4608- 440 -44 OFFICE FURNITURE 27- 1330 - 000 -00 UNIFORM ALLOW 27 -4262- 663 -66 UNIFORM ALLOW 27- 4262- 663 -66 SERVICES 27 -4201- 662 -66 9177 UNIFORM ALLOWENCE - - - -- 27 -4262- 663 -66 - CORRECTION 27- 4262-663 -66 PRINTING 30- 4600-781 -78 * * * -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT CHECK REGISTER 07 -06 -87 PAGE 28 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 187862 06/29/87 16.95 PIP PRINTING PRINTING 30- 4600- 781 -78 42.85 * 187863 06/29/87 7.00 MARY PAT GILES REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 187863 06/29/87 7.00 14.00 -w LISA FLINT - REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 187864 06/29/87 30.00 MARGE SWART REFUND 10- 3500 - 000 -00 187882 06/29/87 4,807.00 -4; 83?- -SA- -* STADIUMS UNLIMITED CONSTRUCTION 25- 1300 - 006 -20 187865 06/29/87 537.90 BEACON PRODUCTS CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 642 -64 94687 537.90 187866 06/29/87 2,319.00 W WOOD WHOLESALE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 646 -64 1925 187866 06/29/87 2,500.00 W WOOD WHOLESALE CONSTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 002 -20 1925 4,819.00 187867 06/29/87 83.20 HENNEPIN COUNTRY MED 1ST AID SUPPLY 10- 4510 - 420-42 5508 187867 06/29/87, 678.54 HENNEPIN COUNTRY MED 1ST AID SUPPLIES 10- 4510 - 440 -44 5508 761.74 187868 06/29/87 70.00 MARY HAVEY REFUND 28- 4201 - 702 -70 70.00 187869- 06/29/87 95.00 SUSAN MCLOUTH SERVICES 28- 4201 - 702 -70 95.00 187870 06/29/87 40.00 BILL BACH REIMBURSEMENT 30- 4516- 781 -78 40.00 187871 06/29/87 75.00 FRANK TOWGAS SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 087871 06,429of87 75.00 FRANK TGWGA8 SERVICES -30 -4201- 781 -78 187872 06/29/87 40.00 BECKY BROM SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 40.00 s 187873 06/29/87 300.00 MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC GENERAL SUPP 10- 4504 - 133 -12 1613 300.00 * 187874 06/29/87 220.00 LANDSCAPE d TURF SOD 6 BLACK DIRT 27- 4562- 664 -66 2709 220.00 * 187875 06/29/87 18.00 RESPONSE EMERGENCY EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 1096 187875 06/29/87 18.00- RESPONSE EMERGENCY CORRECTION 10- 4901- 440 -44 1096 187875 06/29/87 1,800.00 RESPONSE EMERGENCY EQUIP REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 1096 1,800.00 * 187876 06/29/87 922.92 LAKE RESTORATION INC SERVICES - - 10 -4201- 358 -30 7702 187876 06/29/87 2,237.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC SERVICES 10- 4201- 358 -30 7703 3,159.92 * 187877 06/29/87 146.50 VIKING LAB INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564 - 682-68 16835 187877 06/29/87 33.60 VIKING LAB INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564- 682 -68 16621 rm c t r t 1987 _ f OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187878 06/29/87 187879 06/29/87 187880 06/29/87 * 10- 4266- 440 -44 187883 06/29/87 187884 06/29/87 187885 06/29/87 187886 06/29/87 187887 06/29/87 187888 06/29/87 187889 06/29/87 187890 06/29/87 187891 06/29/87 187892 - 06/29/87 187893-- 06/29/87 187894 06/29/87 187895 06/29/87 187896 - 06/29/87 187897 06/29/87 AMOUNT 180.10 * 332.10 332.10 * 631.92 631.92 * 321.00 321.00 * CHECK .ISTER 07 -06 -6 ?AGE 29 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE RECREAONICS CORP FAIRVIEW DYNAMED 150.00 RICHARD VERNON 150.00 * 10- 4266- 440 -44 150.00 GREG SMEGAL 150.00 * 10- 4266- 440 -44 150.00 JAMES SINGLETON 150.00 * 10- 4266- 440 -44 150.00 RONOLD SAMUALSON 150.00 * 10- 4266 - 440 -44 150.00 PATRICK RUNNING 150.00 * 10- 4266 - 440-44 150.00 ALLOWANCE - ALLEN ROTHE 150.00 * 10 -4266- 440 -44 150.00 ALLOWANCE JAMES ROBINSON 150.00 * 10- 4266- 440 -44 150.00 ALLOWANCE JOEL RADJENOVICH 150.00 * 150.00 DAVID RADATZ 150.00 * 150.00 RICHARD MYRE 150.00 * 150.00 ANDREW MEDZIS 150.00 * 150.00 JOHN MALONEY 150.00 * 150.00 WILLIAM LUTTS 150.00 * 150.00 LEROY LISK 150.00 * 150.00 - --- ROBERT LAWSON GEN SUPPLIES 1ST AID SUPPLY 1ST AID SUPPLY 26- 4504 - 682 -68 12877 10- 4510 - 440 -44 286543 10- 4510 - 440 -44 417564 171 10 -4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266- 440 -44 171 10 -4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266 - 440 -44 171 10 -4266- 440 -44 171 10- 4266 - 440-44 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE - 10 -4266- 440 -44 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE- 10- 4266- 440 -44 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 440 -44 * ** -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187898 187899 187900 187901 187902 187903 187904 187905 187906 187906 187906 187906 187906 187907 187908 187909 187910 187911 187912 187913 187914 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/30/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 06/29/87 07 -06 -87 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10 -4266- 440 -44 10 -4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 50 -4204- 800 -80 50 -4204- 800 -80 50- 4204 - 860 -86 50- 4214 - 820 -82 50- 4214 - 840 -84 60- 1300 - 264 -04 870611 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10- 4504 - 506 -50 10- 4201 - 627 -62 27- 4540 - 664 -66 09405 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 704 -70 7234 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 150.00 + 150.00 STEPHEN LANDRY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 JAMES JULKOWSKI UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 RICHARD HELMER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 BRICE GATES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 DENNIS CAIN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 WILLIAM BOWLER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 JAMES BEHR UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 150.00 DOUGLAS BAGBLEY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 150.00 + 26.66 MN STATE PATROL ADVERTISING 26.66- MN STATE PATROL CORRECTION 26.66 MN STATE PATROL ADVERTISING 26.67 MN STATE PATROL ADVERTISING 26.67 MN STATE PATROL ADVERTISING 80.00 + 124.00 RIDDLE CONTROL PROD CONSTRUCTION 124.00 + 42.00 ZECH PIANO SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES 42.00 + 35.00 E C WARD GEN SUPPLIES 35.00 + 230.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 230.00 + 568.25 WINFIELD DEVELOPMENT LEASE 568.25 + 23.14 LAND CARE EQUIP REPAIR PARTS 23.14 + 285.06 ROCHESTER MIDLAND GEN SUPPLIES 285.06 + 72.86 TC FILTER SERVICE GEN SUPPLIES 07 -06 -87 PAGE 30 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10 -4266- 440 -44 10 -4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266- 440 -44 10- 4266 - 440 -44 50 -4204- 800 -80 50 -4204- 800 -80 50- 4204 - 860 -86 50- 4214 - 820 -82 50- 4214 - 840 -84 60- 1300 - 264 -04 870611 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 10- 4504 - 506 -50 10- 4201 - 627 -62 27- 4540 - 664 -66 09405 28- 4504 - 702 -70 28- 4504 - 704 -70 7234 • 1987 ! OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 187915 06/29/87 187916 06/30/87 187916 06/30/67 187916 06/30/87 * * * * ** * 187918 06/30/87 GARTNER REGRIDG CONT REPAIRS 187920 06/30/87 187920 06/30/87 187921 06/30/87 187922 06/30/87 187923 06/30/87 187924 06/30/87 187925 06/30/87 - 187926 06/30/87 187927 06/30/87 187927 06/30/87 187928 06/30/87 187929 06/30/87 187929 06/30/87 187930 06/30/87 187931 06/30/87 476.00 07 -06 -! ,AGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10 -4201- 600 -60 28 -4248- 704 -70 9768 28- 4248 - 704 -70 9768 28- 4248- 704 -70 9768 56.12 JEFFREY EICHHORST MILEAGE 10- 4208- 480 -48 56.12 * 72.00 CHECK ISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 72.86 * OSWALD FIRE HOSE 321.00 NATIONAL CASULATY SERVICES 321.00 * * 658.79 GARTNER REGRIDG CONT REPAIRS 1,058.79 GARTNER REGRIDG CONT REPAIRS 658.79- GARTNER REGRIDG CORRECTION 1,058.79 * * 07 -06 -! ,AGE 31 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 10 -4201- 600 -60 28 -4248- 704 -70 9768 28- 4248 - 704 -70 9768 28- 4248- 704 -70 9768 56.12 JEFFREY EICHHORST MILEAGE 10- 4208- 480 -48 56.12 * 72.00 OSWALD FIRE HOSE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 8736 1,241.50 OSWALD FIRE HOSE EQUIP REPLACEMNENT 10- 4901 - 440 -44 8736 1,313.50 * 334.73 ALEXANDER MFG CO EQUIP REPLAC 10- 4901 - 440 -44 134401 334.73 * 32.03 NS DODGE REPIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 24516 32.03 * 476.00 ED LANCELLO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 390 -30 476.00 * 52.50 GARLANDS INC PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 6209 52.50 * 685.00 MKPLS d SUB SEWER CONT REPAIRS 40 -4248- 803 -80 20353 685.00 108.78 IND LUMBER R PLYWOOD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 081476 108.78 * 11.92 ACE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 23378 18.68 ACE SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 23428 30.60 * 216.00 - -- WEST SIDE ESQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS - -- -- 10- 4540 - 540 -54 10528 216.00 * 18.25 JOYCE REPYA LIC TABS 10- 4310 - 560 -56 1.05 JOYCE REPYA SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 560 -56 19.30 * 223.78 JOHN C HOUDARILLE REPAIR PARATS 40- 4540- 801 -80 223.78 * 252.75 BENSON UNIFORM ALLOW 10 -4262- 646 -64 252.75 * ** -CKS * ** -CKS 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 114.55 187933 06/30/87 - 187934 06/30/87 187934 06/30/87 187934 06/30/87 187935 06/30/67 187935 06/30/87 " 187936 06/30/87 187937 06/30/87 ` 187938 06/30/87 ` 187939 06/30/87 187939 06/30/87 187940 - 06/30/87 187940 06/30/87 187940 06/30/87 187941 06/30/87 187942 06 /30/87 ti 187943 06/30/87 a' 187944 06/30/87 187945 06/30/87 187946 06/30/87 w 187947 06/30/87 - 187948 06/30/87 CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 07 -06 -87 PAGE 32 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE * * * -CKS 114.55 TARGET GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 114.55 26.72 COLOR TILE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 33.60 COLOR TILE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 14.78 COLOR TILE GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 75.10 r 70.00 DANS REGISTER CONT REPAIRS 27 -4248- 663 -66 303.38 DANS REGISTER CONT REPAIRS 27 -4248- 666 -66 373.38 * 47.50 QUALITY RETRIDG INC CONT REPAIRS 27 -4248- 663 -66 053595 47.50 r 20.70 ST PAUL CANDY CONCESSIONS 27-4624- 663 -66 180095 20.70 * 63.63 MERWYN WALKER MILEAGE 27- 4208 - 661 -66 63.63 * 360.96 U S WEST CELLULAR EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226-420 -42 351.28 U S WEST CELLULAR EQUIP RENL 10- 4226- 420 -42 712.24 r 2,000.00 PEAK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 646 -64 200.00 PEAK CONSTRUCTION SERVICES 10- 4201 - 646 -64 200.00- PEAK CONSTRUCTION CORRECTION 10- 4201 - 646 -64 2,000.00 * 354.06 BBP TRAINING AIDS 10 -4608- 281 -28 354.06 • 8,315.94 TREAS S00 LINE CONST 60- 1300 - 137 -04 8;315.94 48.00 MMC CONT REPAIRS 23- 4248 - 612 -61 48.00 r 473.52 MPM INC CONCTRUCTION 60- 1300 - 267 -04 473.52 * 49.28 DIANA HEDGES SUPPLIES 23- 4501 - 612 -61 49.28 * 116.68 BRYAN MOON ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 116.68 * 477.00 TWIGS CONV STORE BOXES 30- 4624- 783 -78 477.00 r. 32.00 MN ASSN OF MUSEUMS MEMBERSHIP 23 -4202- 611 -61 1 1987 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 07 -06 -! SAGE 33 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 32.00 + 187949 06/30/87 120.00 LYLE HOOFNAGLE MAINTENANCE 23- 4120 - 612 -61 120.00 + 187950 06/30/87 192.00 SUSAN HIBBS ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 192.00 + 187951 06/30/87 72.00 J THOMAS NELSON ADVERTISING 23- 4214 - 611 -61 72.00 + 187952 06/30/87 182.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 182.00 + 187953 06/30/87 32.75 AM GRAPHICS INC SAFETY EQUIP 10- 4642- 420 -42 16514 32.75 + 187954 06/30/87 28.81 BRADY OFFICE WARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 27302 28.81 + 187955 06/30/87 65.00 CONCLECO INC SERVICES 10- 4201- 420 -42 10676 65.00 + 187956 06/30/87 2,836.77 HENN CTY TREAS ROOM & BOARD .10 -4286- 220 -22 14968 2,836.77 + 187957 06/30/87 200.00 TIM WALTON PAYMENT 30- 4201 - 783 -78 200.00 + - 187958 06/30/87 30.00 KATHY FAHNHORST REFUND 30- 3511 - 000 -00 30.00 + 187959 06/30/87 650.00 MARY KAHMANN SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 187959 06/30/87 50.00 MARY KAHMANN SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 - 187959 06/30/87 650.00- MARY KAHMANN CORRECTION 30- 4201 - 781 -78 187959 06/30/87 50.00 MARY KAHMANN SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 100.00 + 187960 06/30/87 300.00 TOM PRIN SERICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 300.00 + 187961 06/30/87 50.00 MARY CAROLYN GILKEY SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 187961 06/30/87 50.00 MARY CAROLYN GILKEY SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 100.00 • 187962 06/30/87 150.00 LAURA MACKENZIE SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 150.00 + 187963 06/30/87 50.00 GARY SIPPS SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 50.00 + 187964 06/30/87 455.00- CAROLYN PRIN CORRECTION 10 -4504- 133 -12 187964 06/30/87 455.00 CAROLYN PRIN SERVICES 10 -4504- 133 -12 .00 + 187965" 06/30/87 75.00 INDRANI MALLICK SERVICES 30- 4201- 781 -78 . -� R ■ irnm¢x oR.r■.eeivi r,eib,,,iiel,nwra .- , � _ j - _ _'�,�' __ 1987 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER- 07- 06 -87• PAGE 34 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE 75.00 187966 '06/30/87 50.00 MICHAEL MCCORMICK SERVICES 30- 4201- 781 -78 �� 50.00 • 187967 06/30/87 100.00 CAROL MCCORMICK SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 100.00 * *ss ** * ** —CKS 189721 06/18/87 60.00 JUDY LIEBER SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 60.00 d *s * * ** * ** —CKS 481122 06/23/87 1,429.52— DOMTAR INDUSTRIES CORRECTION 40- 1220 - 000 -00 ` 481122 06/23/87 1,429.52 DOMTAR INDUSTRIES CORRECTION 40- 1220 - 000 -00 481122 06/23/87 1,429.52— DOMTAR INDUSTRIES CORRECTION 40- 1220 - 000 -00 j 481122 06/23/87 1,429.52 DOMTAR INDUSTRIES WATER METERS 40- 1220-000 -00 e 00 s * * * * *s 41 * ** —CKS - 261,284.03 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 3,641.76 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 4,807.00 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 10,250.79 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 21,223.77 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND. 3,957.52 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND -- - 443.58. FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE -FUND 7,876.75 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 256,522.93 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND c 3,988.50 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 71,786.56 FUND 60 TOTAL. CONSTRUCTION FUND 1 _..... 645,783.19 TOTAL- Computer checks dl's 78815 thru 79210 rOR PAYMENT Crec.< °GIST -3 GATED 5`7 f y PP"'s l y � y TY.CCJL,4 _. F1 N AN IR R 1