Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988-06-20_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING JUNE 20, 1988 ROLLCALL I. APPROVAL OF HRA MINUTES OF JUNE 6, 1988 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL COMMENDATION - Edina High School Girls' Golf Team Edina High School Boys' Tennis Team I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All Agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print Are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless 'a Council. Member or citizen so requests, in•which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meetings of May 16 and June 6, 1988. III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 vote required if no petition. A. Sidewalk Improvement No. P -S -45 - West 62nd Street from France Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue (South side) (Contd from 5/16/88) B. Sound Wall /Sight Barriers - Highway 100 from West 50th Street to North City Limits (Contd from 4/18/88) IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment hears. Motion to'close hearing. Zoning? Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval.of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Harvey Swenson - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District - Generally located southeast of Vernon Avenue and west of Sherwood Avenue (Contd from 6/6/88) (Application Withdrawn) B. Preliminary Plat Approval 1. Swenson's Replat of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Edenmoor Addition - Generally located southeast of Vernon Avenue west of Sherwood Avenue V. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI.. AWARD OF BIDS A. Braemar Ice Arena Renovation Phase I B. Tree Trimming - SW Quadrant of City C. Removal of Diseased.Trees D. Tree Stump Removal E. Used Lever Automatic Voting.Machines F. Insurance Renewals Edina City Council Agenda June 20, 1988 Page 2 VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes - 6/14/88 B. Wine License Renewals Follow -up Session C. SHHSC Extension of First Call for Help Mon July 11 D. Fees and Charges 7:00 E. 1989 Budget Hearing Dates Regular F. Verbal Report - Traffic Diverter - Summit /Interlachen Blvd. p.m. Council Room G. 1988 -89 Work Program VIII. COMMUNICATIONS /PETITIONS A. Letter - Lane Ayres, 4407 Branson St. IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XI. FINANCE * A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 6/20/88: General Fund $758,826.92, Art Center $5,515.11, Capital Fund $164,289.54, Swimming Pool Fund $5,459.16, Golf Course Fund $65,754.71, Recreation Center Fund $1,231.22, Edinborough Park $4,893.83, Utility Fund $18,616.30, Liquor Dispensary Fund $107,095.58, Construction Fund $752.50,.IMP Bond Redemption #2 $ 120,675.00;' Total $1,253,109.87; and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 5 /31/88: General Fund $425,082.15, Art Center $1,408.23, Swimming Pool Fund $426.82, Golf Course Fund $12,247.36, Recreation Center Fund $5.,909.10, Gun Range Fund $672.84, Edinborough Park $9,745.47, Utility Fund $21,471.88, Liquor Dispensary Fund $283,002,84, Construction Fund $290.00, Total $760,256.69. Mon Aug 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug` 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS Mon June 27 Council Follow -up Session 5 -9 p.m. Manager's Conf Room Mon July 11 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon July 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room Mon Aug` 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room MINUTES EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JUNE 6, 1988 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Richards, Smith and Turner. The meeting was chaired by Commissioner Richards. MINUTES of the HRA Meeting of May 16, 1988 were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motiori,carried. BID AWARDED FOR PARKING FACILITY ADDITION (51ST STREET RAMP). Executive Director Gordon Hughes advised that on May 13, 1988 bids were opened for the 51st Street Ramp Expansion and Upgrade project which was authorized in connection with the Edina Theatre expansion. The bid was structured with a number of add or deduct alternate bids in order to provide flexibility in awarding the various elements of the project, most notably the possible addition of brick to upgrade the appearance of the facility as well as the addition of an enclosed stairtower in the northeast corner of the ramp. Staff decided that it was likewise advisable to receive bids for certain repair work and upgrading within the existing ramp, given the age of the facility and the presumption that the best prices would be received in connection with the expansion project. Costs for this repair and upgrading were not estimated at the time of the project hearing. The cost of this repair and upgrading is included in the basic construction bid as follows: Project Hrg Estimate Bid Add One Level (including repairs and upgrades to existing ramp) $620,000 $ 781,519 Stairtower (alternate bid) 20,000 40,000 Brick Upgrade (alternate bid) 78,000 227,000 Contingency 42.000 -0- TOTAL $760,000 $1,048,519 Director Hughes said that in analyzing the bids the estimated cost of adding the one level of the ramp was very close to the estimated price of $620,000, the difference represents the consultant's estimate of the cost of doing the repairs and upgrades. The major overrun is in two areas: 1) the addition of.an. enclosed stairtower in the northeasterly corner of the ramp, and 2) the brick upgrade. Based upon review of the bids, staff believes that the HRA has the following options. He noted that Sheehy Construction is the low- bidder regardless of which option ;is selected. Option 1: Award the entire project including the brick addition, stairtower and repair and upgrade work $1,048,519 Option 2: Award the ramp expansion and repair and upgrade work but delete the brick addition and the stairtower. Due to the complexity of this bidding process, staff believes that if the brick is deleted, the stairtower also must be deleted. If this option is selected, the stairtower should be rebid or negotiated as a change order later. $ 781,519 The basic decision for the HRA is the desirability of enhancing the ramp's appearance with brick. If brick is deleted, the existing ramp and expansion would be patched and repainted. Based upon staff's review of the bids and discussion with contractors, it is not felt that the brick upgrade could be accomplished later at a lesser cost. In that the brick upgrade was discussed at the project hearing, Director Hughes said that the residents of The Lanterns Condominiums and the 50th and France Business Association has been invited to attend this meeting. A letter has been received from Dr. James Layer, owner of the 3939 W. 50th Street building who recommended that the brick not be added. It is apparent from the letter that it is his understanding that this will be assessed against commercial property owners. The proposal was to assess a portion of the cost to the.Edina Theatre project and the rest would be paid through tax increment financing. 40. M:... H.R.A. Minutes June 6, 1988 Page 2 Director Hughes presented graphics showing the excess increments that the 50th and France District is now generating and is projected to generate in the future. The projections show that the addition of the brick is affordable but it is an additional expenditure over the estimate. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked if the assessment to the theatre would go up proportionately. Director Hughes explained that it was not proposed that the theatre should pay a share of the repair work and upgrading of the existing. facility. The assessment to the theatre is estimated at $240,000 and the impact on the tax increment district will be greater. Gene Haugland, property owner at 50th and France, asked about the timing for the brick upgrade and why it would be wiser to delete the stairtower at this time and re -bid or negotiate as a change order later. Engineer Hoffman said that the total project, including the brick upgrade, will be done by late September. Between the theatre construction and the ramp upgrade, the stairtower will be the last thing to be finished, probably late October. Regarding the stairtower, it was obvious that the bidder did not understand the'specifications. Director Hughes said when you delete the brick from the stairtower there are no walls left; by deleting the brick the low bidder in essence deleted the stairtower also. The only option is to go with the next low bidder or re -bid the project. Walter Sandison, 4612 58th Street, asked if the brick upgrade was worth the cost. William Korst, Korst Jewelers, said the ramp was over -due for a face lift, should be upgraded and that the stairtower was needed. Mr. Haugland asked about -the effect on the tax increment district and alternative amenities. Engineer Hoffman said the decision for the HRA was what investment they wanted to make in the structure itself and how important it is to the 50th and France commercial district. Director Hughes said that it would add a desirable element and that he would recommend the brick upgrade. Commissioner Smith commented that he could not support the expenditure for the brick upgrade. Commissioner Turner said she would favor Option 2 and that the stairtower was important and should be negotiated. Following some discussion regarding the stairtower as to re- bidding or negotiating as a change order, Commissioner Turner moved approval of Option 2 as outlined with the stairtower to be negotiated to recommended low bidder, Sheehy Construction, at $781,519. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards said he would support Option 1 and that it was important to to continue to enhance the retail area at 50th and France. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that there is a push to next year renovating the tile -and sidewalks at 50th and France and,that maybe something could be done architecturally to improve the ramp appearance as part of that package without doing all brick upgrade. Following further discussion, Mayor Pro -Tem called for vote on the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner Nays: Richards Motion carried. PURCHASE OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR HRA APPROVED. Ceil Smith, Assistant to Manager, recalled that at the last meeting the Council considered a proposal for purchase of public official liability insurance for the HRA and the commissioners had asked for further information as to the need for this type of coverage. She referred to a letter from David Crowther dated May 18, 1988 in which he explained that the public official coverage for the City contains a specific exclusion in the definition of the insured for actions of boards and commissions including housing authorities and therefore the HRA must secure its own public official coverage. National Casualty Company has provided two quotations for this coverage and staff would recommend Option A which would provide $1,000,000 in coverage for each occurrence with $5,000 deductible for each claim. Commissioner Smith moved approval of purchase of public official liability insurance for the ERA from National Casualty Company for $1,000,000 coverage with H.R.A. Minutes June 6, 1988 Page 3 $5,000 deductible at a premium of $4,575.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING ACTIVITIES OF HRA DIRECTOR. EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS IN CONSULTING /ADVISING EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION. In reference to indemnity of HRA officials by the HRA and as recommended by Attorney Erickson, Commissioner Turner moved adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE DIRECTOR, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND EMPLOYEES, OFFICERS AND AGENTS OF THE ERA IN CONSULTING WITH AND ADVISING THE EAST EDINA HOUSING FOUNDATION AND RECOGNIZING THAT SUCH CONSULTATION AND ADVICE IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THEIR EMPLOYMENT AND OFFICIAL DUTIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: WHEREAS, the BRA has entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment, dated August.l, 1985, with East Edina Housing Foundation, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation, for the development of property in the City of Edina described in the Agreement and known as Edinborough, and has entered into a Land Sale Agreement and Contract for Private Redevelopment with East Edina Housing Foundation, dated on or as of March 14, 1988, for the development of property in the City of Edina known as the Hedberg Project; and WHEREAS, the Director and Executive Director and other employees, officers and agents of the HRA, in connection with those Agreements, have been working with; advising, and consulting with the Foundation relative to.those projects and relative to the low and moderate income housing that was developed in Edinborough and is proposed to be developed in the Hedberg Project, and in connection with the second mortgages which the Foundation has obtained in the Edinborough project and are proposed to be obtained in-the Hedberg project; and WHEREAS, the activities, including consultation and advice, of the Director and Executive Director and other employees, officers and agents of the HRA, have been necessary for the success of the Edinborough project and are and will be necessary for the success of the Hedberg Project, and to achieve the goals of the BRA in developing those two projects. IT IS, THEREFORE, recognized and acknowledged by the HRA that all of the activities, including consultation and advice, heretofore done or given or hereafter to be done or given by the Director and Executive Director, or any other officer, employee or agent of the ERA or City, in connection with the Hedberg Project or the Edinborough project, or any other project in which the Foundation may hereafter be involved in the City of Edina, is within the scope of the employment of all such officers, employees and agents and in performance of a part of their official duties, and all such activities of any of such parties heretofore taken or made are hereby ratified and confirmed as within their authority as officer, employees or agents of the HRA and as within the scope of their employment and official duties. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Commissioner Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Resolution adopted. HRA PARTIAL FUNDING OF SUMMIT AVENUE ISLAND REFUSED. Director Hughes referred to a letter directed to the HRA from Robert Hamilton, owner of Interlachen Town Homes, concerning the traffic diversion island for the Summit Avenue / Interlachen Boulevard intersection. He recalled that the construction of this diversion was the responsibility of Westminster Corporation in conjunction with the construction f H.R.A. Minutes June 6, 1988 Page 4 of the Summit Point elderly housing project. Westminster is willing to construct a division, however, they apparently are unable financially to construct the upgraded diverter requested by Mr. Hamilton. Bid for the diverter totaled $21,000.00. In that this diversion is proposed to be located on both Westminster's and Hamilton's properties, both owners must agree. The solution as suggested by Mr. Hamilton is that the HRA contribute $9,000 toward the construction of the island. Mr. Hamilton proposes to contribute $8,000 and Westminster proposes to contribute $4,000 which is their budgeted amount for the work. Mr. Hamilton has suggested a more ambitious diverter with added landscaping, signage, etc. and has submitted a plan for that purpose. Because the HRA was involved in the Summit Point elderly housing project, Mr. Hamilton suggested that the HRA should assume some of the cost of constructing the upgraded diverter. In that HRA financial participation in this work has never been discussed, Mr. Hamilton was advised that the HRA would have to authorize this expenditure. If the HRA does not wish to participate, and if Westminster and Mr. Hamilton cannot agree on a private project, then the City will be required to construct a simple but functional diverter within the Interlachen Boulevard right of way. This simplified diverter could be constructed within the $4,000 budget of Westminster. .Commissioner Turner asked if a simplified diverter would do the job. Engineer Hoffman said that it would. Commissioner Smith asked how to get the temporary barrier removed and the diverter constructed. Director Hughes said that the HRA has already authorized a diverter to be constructed. Manager Rosland suggested that the HRA refuse to participate in funding the upgraded diverter and so advise the parties involved, giving them a deadline to come to agreement or the City will put in the diverter. Commissioner Smith moved that Robert Hamilton and Westminster be advised that the HRA does not intend to participate in partial finding of the diverter and if the two parties cannot come to agreement within two weeks the City will construct a simple diverter, cost of which shall be the responsibility of Westminster Corporation. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner. Ayes:' Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motioh''carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Commissioner Kelly moved adjournment. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Turner and carried. Executive Director r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 16, 1988 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING ON SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -45 CONTINUED TO 6/20/88. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth: A. CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -45 IN THE FOLLOWING; West 62nd Street from France Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue (South Side) Engineer Hoffman advised that this hearing has been called as a result of a petition from residents for better pedestrian access to other walkways and Pamela Park. He presented a graphic showing the location of the petitioners. The cost of construction is proposed to be paid by an area assessment if the majority involved support the project. Under present City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The estimated cost for the south side is $23,24.0.37. The proposed assessment is $270.24 per lot over an area bounded by West 62nd Street on the north to the Crosstown Highway 62 on the South. The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of asphalt. The alignment will be varied to protect existing property features to the greatest extent possible and is proposed to be constructed in 1988. The petition requested the assessment be over a three year period. Engineer Hoffman explained that the location is not in the City's capital plan and that it is not anticipated that West 62nd Street will be improved during the next ten years. The sidewalk is proposed as asphalt because of cost and would provide a temporary walkway prior to reconstruction of the street as a State Aid project. He said that a second petition has been received from residents on West 62nd Street in opposition to the proposed project. As to the question of traffic, counts indicate that 1,800 -2,600 vehicles per day use West 62nd Street and it is one of the lower volume State Aid streets in that part of the City. During 1987 the Speed Enforcement Unit monitored West 62nd Street on 7 -8 occasions. Dave Shank, owner of property at 4301 -05 West 62nd Street, asked that the sidewalk be constructed on the east side of his property to connect to the sidewalk on Valley View Road so he would not have sidewalk on both sides, also that he preferred it to be concrete. Douglas Yarwood, 4000 West 62nd Street, said he had circulated the petition in opposition and that the majority of residents on West 62nd Street did not want the sidewalk. Also speaking in opposition were: Bob Bjork, 6201 Brook-view Avenue; Jerry Kopveiler, 4129 West 62nd Street; Randolph Hippe, 4213 W. 62nd Street; John McCanna, 4009 West 62nd Street; Ralph Schoenrock, 6228 Peacedale Avenue. Speaking in support of the proposed walkway were: Jim Deusterhoff, 6320 Peacedale Avenue; Teri Ellis, 6223 Halifax Avenue;'Paul Weise, 6301 Peacedale Avenue; Joe Szarzynski, 6304 Halifax Avenue and Trish Crane, 6220 Halifax Avenue. Following discussion, Member Kelly moved that the public hearing on Sidewalk - Improvement No. P -S -45 be continued to June 20, 1988, so that the issue of traffic safety could be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee for their recommendations. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR JERRY'S ENTERPRISES CONTINUED TO 6/6/88. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to continue the public hearing on preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Jerry's Enterprises to the meeting of June 6, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR PINEWOOD TOWNHOMES (HARVEY SWENSON) CONTINUED: FINDINGS TO BE DRAFTED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen presented the request for rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District and preliminary plat approval for property bounded by Vernon Avenue on the west, Sherwood Avenue on the east, single family homes to the south and a one -story office building on the north. The subject property measures approximately 1 1/2 acres in size and is currently developed with two single family homes. It consists of 3 lots platted in the Edenmoor Addition; the middle lot does not have street frontage. The proposed project would remove the existing dwellings and redevelop the site with six townhouse units. All units would be one story in height with a south facing walkout level. The garages would face north against the rear of the office building. An unusual feature of the units is the main floor master bedroom. All units have slightly over 1,500 square feet of living area on the main floor. Planner Larsen said that the proposed development is essentially a double bungalow development but that since the project would be served by a private rather than public street, PRD -2 zoning is required. The proposal meets or exceeds all requirements of the PRD -2 District. The Ordinance requires 7,200 square feet of land area per dwelling unit; the proposal provides 10,620 square feet per unit. Lot coverage is 18 percent, well below the permitted 25 percent. The subject property is shown as Single Family Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. The proposed use is not consistent with that designation. Consequently, a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Low Density Attached Residential would be required. The subject site contains a small piece of right of way for Edenmoor Street dedicated by the original plat. This right of way was never improved with a public street. Located in the southeasterly corner of the site, the parcel measures approximately 30 x 110 feet. The proponent is requesting vacation of the right of way. Planner Larsen explained that the project was originally submitted as a seven unit development with site access only from Sherwood Avenue. This proposal was withdrawn prior to the March 30, 1988 Planning Commission meeting and is now proposed as three two -unit buildings. In staff's opinion the proponent has presented a very attractive project; the townhouses maintain a low profile and are relatively unobtrusive. The units appear to offer features that would be attractive to the market for townhouses in Edina. With a land area of approximately 10,600 square feet per unit, the project has a density similar to many single family neighborhoods, including Richmond Hills. The building width of 68 feet for each two -unit building is similar to the width of many existing single family homes in the neighborhood. Planner Larsen said it appears that the property could be replatted into four single family lots similar to the lots on Edenmoor. A single family plat would not allow control of the size and design of the homes and would not provide for a landscaping requirement. A single family plat would also require a public street, where the townhouses could be served by a private street. The proposal was considered by the Community Development and Planning Commission on April 27, 1988 and recommended preliminary rezoning, preliminary plat approval and approval of an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, subject to 1) final rezoning and final plat approval, 2) developer's agreement, 3) elimination of Vernon Avenue access with a knock -down barrier to allow emergency vehicle access, and 4) subdivision dedication. Harvey Swenson, proponent, stated that he lives in the home on the subject property at 5338 Sherwood, and that Francis McGuire, lives in the second home on the site at 5222 Vernon Avenue. He stated they feel the two smaller homes are an underdevelopment, that the proposal is a reasonable redevelopment of the site, is sensitive to the single family homes to the south and that the townhomes would be a reasonable transitional use between the commercial office building to the north and the single family homes to the south. The scale of the development would be in keeping with homes immediately to the South, with one -story profiles and land sloping down to the south creating a natural walkout unit. Mr. Swenson stated that he is proposing landscaping and earth berming as screening for the adjacent homes. He concluded by saying these would be "For Sale" townhouses of high quality. Member Smith asked the anticipated sale price for the townhouses, whether Mr. Swenson had considered single family dwelling as an alternative, and if they could be required to be owner occupied. In response Mr. Swenson said the townhomes would be priced at $200 - 225,000. He commented that single family homes would be a poor second choice as the lots would need a cul -de -sac, two of the homes would back up to Vernon Avenue and would need severe screening and would have to be lower priced homes to be marketable in that location. As to owner occupancy, Mr. Swenson said that- - requirement could be in the sale documents. Rich Rosch, 5248-Richwood Drive, said he had three concerns: 1) that the units would look down onto his back yard, 2) storm water drainage because of the slope of the land, and 3) that if is approved the project be finished expeditiously. Mayor Courtney questioned Planner Larsen's statement in the staff report about being reluctant to recommend a change in the Comprehensive Plan. Planner Larsen explained that he would advocate being very careful about any change to the Plan and that the reasons for any change be evaluated very thoroughly. Member Richards commented that he was troubled by the fact that the Council just went through the process of looking at many areas of the City, looked at the Comprehensive Plan in general and talked about the issues relating to single family housing stock and the various R- District classifications. He said he was bothered by the comment that the City has more controls over property zoned R -2 District or above with regard to berming and landscaping, etc. that do not exist in the R -1 District. He said he would rather go back and try to put those controls in the R -1 District in response to the argument that we change the zoning and the Comprehensive Plan in order to have those controls. He said he felt this property could be developed as single family homes with proper berming and access. Member Kelly said she shared Member Richard's concern about changing the Comprehensive Plan for this site and thereby setting a precedent for other large lots on Vernon Avenue. She said the only reason this might be an exception is that it does abut the commercial area. Member Turner commented that she did not support the proposed rezoning or amending the Comprehensive Plan. In this case there is a well defined single family neighborhood that is accessed by Sherwood Avenue and that this proposal is not. consistent with the neighborhood. Member Smith said that staff has received some well thought out letters that provide a good basis for denial of any rezoning consideration. Also, that there are good residential alternatives for this site. He added that he is also concerned about what will be proposed for the Lewis Engineering property as it will impact this neighborhood and that until he understood what will be proposed there he could not consider increased density for the subject property. Mr. Swenson commented that what was more important to him than maximizing the return was doing the right development for the site with regard to the marketplace. He said that this would be a first class development and in response to Mr. Rosch's concerns about drainage, he explained that the entire site slopes directly south now and the water run -off goes directly into the neighbors' backyards. With berming and grading all the water from this site can be diverted directly to the west to a low point where there is a storm sewer collector to eliminate the existing problem. He added that another element where single family just does not work on this site is that there are windows along the back side of the Harvey Hansen office building and lights are left on all night for security reasons - very obtrusive for residential. In the proposed development those windows would be screened more effectively. He concluded by saying that he is trying to find a reasonable solution to a problem site that is at single family density and scale. He said he felt the close neighbors prefer this proposal to single family lots with sideyard setback of 15 -20 feet. Robert Millner, 5212 Richwood Drive, said he was concerned about the rezoning and asked for an explanation of the proposed rezoning. Planner Larsen explained that if the property is rezoned to PRD -2 the proposed plan is the only plan that can be built on the property. Mr. Rosch commented that the last thing he wanted to see was a street running through his backyard on the old road easement. If the property is left at R -1 District, he wanted to be sure that all control is not taken away. Clifford Thompson, 5252 Richwood Drive, said he was concerned about the height of the proposed development and wondered if the site could be graded down somewhat. Richard Peterson, 5236 Edenmoor Street, said he would like to see the property remain R -1 District and was concerned about Edenmoor being extended to serve as access. R.F.D. Johnson, 5260 Richwood Drive, said he had no objection to the plan proposed providing the plan will not be objectionable to himself and the neighborhood. He expressed concern about increased traffic on Sherwood Drive and height of the buildings proposed. He also said if this is not approved by the Council he was concerned that the property may be sold to Harvey Hanson for building expansion. Member Smith moved to direct staff to prepare and bring back for discussion and final decision on June 6, 1988, Findings of Fact in support of denial of the rezoning and preliminary plat for FineQood Townhomes. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. PRELIMINARY REZONING TO R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR LANDMARK ADDITION. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen presented the request for rezoning and preliminary plat approval for Landmark Addition advising that the subject property is undeveloped and is approximately 2 1/2 acres in size. To the north and east of the property is Van Valkenburg Park; to the northwest is The Prime Office Park development. The property directly west is undeveloped land zoned for office use and immediately south is a single family home fronting on Lincoln Drive. Planner. Larsen explained that the proposal is to rezone to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and to plat the property into 5 double bungalow lots. The lots range in size from 17,017 to 31,577 square feet in area and average 22,537 square feet. All lots exceed Zoning Ordinance standards for R -2 lots. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the property as Low Density Attached Residential. The proposed development requires the improvement of a portion of Malibu Drive. Two of the proposed lots would have frontage on the new street and ultimately this segment of Mailbu Drive will connect to Interlachen Boulevard. At its meeting of April 27, 1988 the Community Development and Planning Commission recommended preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval based on the fact that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and that all lots meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements. The recommendation for approval was conditioned on: 1) final rezoning, 2) final plat approval, 3) developer's agreement, and 4) subdivision dedication. Planner Larsen pointed out that since the Planning Commission meeting staff has checked further into the issue of subdivision dedication and has discovered that this property was platted as an outlot in Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition (Carl Hansen's remaining property). At that time in 1978 land was dedicated from Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition to form parts of Van Valkenburg Park. The City agreed that no further land or cash would need to be dedicated from his properties pursuant to an agreement entered into between Carl Hansen and the City in 1972. Based on that agreement and the previous land dedication from Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition staff would find that the subdivision dedication requirement for the subject property has been satisfied. No comment or objection being heard, Member Turner moved preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval with First Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A25 and adoption of the following resolution, subject to: 1) final rezoning, 2) final plat approval, and 3) developer's agreement: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is a �- enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot C, Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition except that part which lies southerly of a line which bears North 61 degrees 47 minutes 31 seconds East from the northeast corner of Outlot B, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition. For purposes of this description, the north line of said Outlot B is assumed to bear North 87 degrees 51 minutes 16 seconds East." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR LANDMARK ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled. "LANDMARK ADDITION ", platted by The Lincoln Drive Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of May 16, 1988 be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion for preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval was seconded by Member Richards. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney First Reading granted; resolution adopted. DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS UPHELD: VARIANCE DENIED FOR 6231 FRANCE AVENUE SO. Planner Larsen presented the appeal of Thelma Anderson, 6231 France Avenue South, from a Board of Appeals decision denying a 3 foot front yard setback variance to enlarge a dining room. The subject property is a double bungalow and the variance request would allow construction of a 5 x 11 foot addition to the front of the dwelling on the south one -half of the building. The proposed addition would extend 3 feet into the required minimum front yard setback and the bay window would project an additional 1.5 feet into the setback area. An aerial photograph illustrates that the homes on the east of France Avenue are in line and maintain a uniform front yard setback. The Board of Appeals considered the variance request on April 21, 1988 and denied the request on the grounds that the general uniformity of the area would be compromised and an unfavorable precedent would be set for an established neighborhood. Oren Bakken, a nephew representing Thelma Anderson, stated that the proposed variance would have little or no effect on the homes in the neighborhood. He explained that Mrs. Anderson cannot relocate the dining room within the double bungalow, does not wish to sell her home, and with her furniture in the dining room there is no room for people. He stated that the addition would not harm the beauty of the area or disturb the symmetry significantly as argued by the Board. He said that she could even manage with a variance of 1.5 to 2 feet if that could be approved. In conclusion, Mr. Bakken asked that the Council grant the requested variance as originally proposed or grant the alternate variance of 1.5 to 2 feet. Member Smith commented that he was concerned about the precedent that would be set if this variance were approved. No other comment being heard, Member Smith moved to uphold the decision of the Board of Appeals to deny the variance request for property at 6231 France Avenue So. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, - -Smith, Turner, Courtney Board of Appeals decision upheld. ORDINANCE NO.. 902 -A5 (AMENDING WINE LICENSING ORDINANCE) GRANTED FIRST READING. Manager Rosland recalled that First Reading of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 had been continued from the Council meeting of May 2, 1988 and that the Council had requested alternative language be drafted for the proposed amendment to the wine licensing ordinance. The present ordinance requires that a restaurant patron must order a meal prior to being served wine. This requirement conflicts with the customary practice whereby the patron orders a glass of wine prior to making a menu selection. He explained that during inspections it was found that there are violations of the ordinance requirements and that they are difficult to enforce. The proposed amendment softens the present requirement provided that the restaurant informs patrons of the requirement that wine service is dependent on food service. Chief Craig Swanson advised that alternative #2, which was essentially the proposal at the last meeting eliminating the term "intend to ", would be most acceptable and would reduce enforcement problems with the licensee. In discussing the alternatives with.the City Attorney, they concluded that this would put the responsibility of ordering a meal to be consumed with the wine on the patron along with the licensee. He reviewed the present inspection process and the situation whereby the ordinance as presently written is violated. Member Smith commented that he was bothered about legislating what should be printed in menus. Attorney Erickson observed that the only virtue in having the additional language about placards being posted or notices contained in the menu is that that would be an objective fact that a police officer could observe. Chief Swanson commented that as the ordinance now stands there is 80 -90% non - compliance. That information would be brought to the Council at the time of license renewals and the Council could act or not act relating to that type of violation. Member Richards moved approval of alternative #2 with First Reading of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO CLARIFY THE REQUIREMENT THAT A MEAL BE CONSUMED WITH WINE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of Section 40 of Part H of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) No person shall be sold, served or consume vine who does not order a meal to be consumed with vine. The licensee shall advise all patrons of the requirements of this paragraph (a) either through placards displayed in the restaurant or notices contained in the menu and wine list." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for First Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith First Reading granted. Member Smith asked that the Prosecuting Attorney review the ordinance amendment prior to Second Reading for any comment or suggestions. ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 (REQUIRING GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING) AND ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A5 (PERMITTING PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON CURB FOR PICK -UP) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Member Richards moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1301 -A3 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1301 -A3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1301 TO REQUIRE GARBAGE HAULERS TO COLLECT YARD WASTE FOR COMPOSTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Ordinance No. 1301 is amended by adding a new Section 15 as follows: "Sec. 15. Collection of Compostable Materials. Haulers shall collect and segregate, from other garbage and refuse, all grass clippings and leaves which have been separated from other garbage and refuse and placed, in bags designed for such purpose by residential customers, for pick -up. Haulers shall report to the City Sanitarian the amount, by weight, of such leaves and grass clippings delivered to compost disposal sites approved by Hennepin County for the four -month periods ending April 30, August 31 and December 31. Such reports shall be submitted within fifteen (15) days following the end of each four month period." Sec. 2. Original Section 15 of Ordinance No. 1301 is hereby renumbered Section 16. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Member Turner moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 711 -A5 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 711 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 711 TO PERMIT THE PLACEMENT OF GRASS CLIPPINGS AND LEAVES ON THE CURB ADJOINING RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 3 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Sec. 3. Refuse to be kept in containers. All refuse on any premise shall be stored in the containers required by Sec. 2 hereof, except as the same may be consumed or disposed of on such premises as permitted by said section and except as provided in Sec. 4 hereof." Sec. 2. Sec. 4 of Ordinance No. 711 is hereby amended by inserting "(a)" immediately after the heading of Sec. 4,.and by adding a new paragraph "(b)" to Sec. 4 as follows: "(b) Grass clippings and leaves may be placed next to the street or curb adjoining residential properties for pick -up provided that such grass clippings and leaves so placed shall be: i) stored within a bag designed for such a purpose and ii) placed at the curb no more than twelve (12) hours prior to the scheduled pick -up. Sec. 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly, Richards Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor ORDINANCE NO. 102 (LIMITING TERMS ON BOARDS /COMMISSIONS) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Member Smith moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 102 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 102 AN ORDINANCE I TING TERMS OF SERVICE OF INDIVIDUALS APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL TO BOARD, COMMISSIONS OR COMMITTEES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Limitation on Tenure. No person shall be appointed or reappointed by the City Council to any board, commission, committee or any other advisory of legislative body if he or she has served on that board, commission or committee for a cumulative period of twelve or more years (whether or not consecutive). Sec. 2. Exceptions: Members of the City Council and employees of the City of Edina who by virtue of their employment with the City are appointed by the City Council to boards, commissions and committees shall be exempt from the provisions of this ordinance. Sec. 3. Valid Appointment. Any person who is appointed or reappointed in error or inadvertence in violation of this ordinance shall yet be deemed validly appointed and all action taken by such person in the position to which he or she is appointed shall be valid, but such person may be discharged and a new appointment or reappointment made at the pleasure of the Council. Sec. 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on January 1, 1990. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner Nays: Richards, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ATTEST:. City Clerk Mayor *BID AWARDED FOR ASPHALT ROLLER/VIBRATORY COMPACTOR. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for an asphalt roller /vibratory compactor to recommended low bidder, Aspen Equipment Company, at $39,600.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR TRUCK AND LOG LOADER. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a truck and log loader to recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing, at $77,798.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. �. *BID AWARDED FOR REPAIR OF DEEP WELL #10. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for repair of deep well #10 to recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons, at $13,675.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT - LAKE CORNELIA PARK. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for playground equipment for Lake Cornelia Park to recommended low bidder, Earl F. Anderson Company, at $9,579.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 4TH OF JULY FIREWORKS. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for 4th of July fireworks to recommended bidder, Northern Lighter Pyrotechnics, Inc. at $6,000.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF MAY 10, 1988 APPROVED. Engineer Hoffman directed the Council's attention to the first item in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 10, 1988. The request was for measures to alleviate volume and speed problems on Halifax Avenue South from West 50th Street through West 54th Street. This item had been continued from the April 1988 meeting so that speed surveys could be conducted. Traffic counts showed that there is a volume of over 1,000 vehicles per day on Halifax from 50th to 52nd Street. The Committee recommended that a temporary traffic diverter and appropriate signage be placed at 51st and Halifax which would not allow vehicles to enter Halifax at 51st Street but would permit vehicles to exit. John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue, said he was the representing the residents of Halifax Avenue between 51st and 54th Streets and spoke in support of the Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation and explained the neighborhood survey that had been taken. In summary, he stated that the residents of Halifax Avenue between 51st and 54th Streets want a reduction of the excessive amount of traffic on their street and urged the Council to adopt the recommendation for a trial period. Following discussion, motion of Member Richards was seconded by Member Turner to approve the following recommended action listed in Section A of the Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of May 10, 1988: 1) That "DO NOT ENTER" signs be posted at the southbound entrance to Halifax Avenue from West 51st Street, that a "NO LEFT TURN" sign be posted on westbound West 51st Street, that a "NO RIGHT TURN" sign be posted on eastbound West 51st Street, and that a temporary lighted barricade be placed across one lane of Halifax Avenue to prevent entrance. Addendum: to conduct a larger area survey in conjunction with these signings, 2) That "NO PARKING ANYTIME" signs be installed on both sides of Link Road between Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue, 3) That "NO PARKING" signs be installed on the north side of Eden Avenue for a three -month temporary period with the possibility of making them permanent, and to install "NO PARKING, 7 AM - 9 AN, 4 PM - 6 PM" signs on east side of Grange Road, and to acknowledge Sections B and C of the minutes. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. ON -SALE BEER LICENSE APPROVED FOR THE LOTUS RESTAURANT. Manager Rosland advised the Council that the City has received an application for an On -Sale Beer License from The Lotus III Restaurant, 3907 W. 50th Street. The application has been approved by the Police and Health Departments and is recommended for approval. Residential property owners within 500 feet of the restaurant have been mailed notice and no objections to the issuance of the license have been received. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Nember Turner to approve issuance of an On -Sale Beer License to The Lotus III Restaurant at 3907 W. 50th Street. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Turner, Courtney Nays: Smith Motion carried. REPORT GIVEN ON OPEN HOUSE PARTY ORDINANCE NO. 905. Manager Rosland recalled that at the last meeting the Council had adopted Ordinance No. 905 (Open House Party Ordinance) that would regulate the use of alcoholic beverages and.controlled substances at open house parties. The Council also had made a motion that the ordinance be submitted to the Prosecuting Attorney for comment. Manager Rosland reported that the ordinance has been reviewed by the Prosecuting Attorney who sees no perceived problem with the ordinance as adopted. No action was taken. REPRESENTATION ON HENNEPIN CONSERVATION DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that the Hennepin Conservation District is seeking persons interested in serving on an advisory committee with regard to ground water protection. .Member Turner suggested that this be forwarded to the Community Development and Planning Commission to see if someone would like to serve and also asked if there should be representation from Edina. Member Richards commented that we have representation on the the Minnehaha Creek and Nine Mile Creek Tatershed District Boards who are active in this issue and that -the Council may wish to ask the watershed boards if they are going to participate with the Hennepin Conservation District in ground water protection. Manager Rosland observed that one of the candidates for the watershed districts boards who was not appointed may be interested in serving. No action was taken. 75TH ANNIVERSARY LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES CONFERENCE JUNE 7 -10 NOTED. Manager Rosland reminded the Council of the 75th Anniversary League of Minnesota Cities Conference to be held June 7 - 10 at the St. Paul Radisson. He said Council Members planning to attend should advise Susan Wohlrabe so that the registration can be submitted for the City of Edina. DATE CONFIRMED FOR REPORT OF PARK & RECREATION TASK FORCE. Manager Rosland advised that the Park & Recreation Task Force has completed their work and would like to make their report to the Council on Monday, June 6. Following discussion it was agreed to -meet on June 6 at 4:30 p.m. to receive the report of the Park and Recreation Task Force. *FEASIBILITY REPORT APPROVED FOR WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER EXTENSIONS - RYAN AVENUE: PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR 6/6/88. Notion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT P -W -364 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -SS -378 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed watermain and sanitary sewer improvements described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, June 6, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvements. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and to mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RYAN AVENUE FROM W. 62ND TO W. 63RD STREET 7 PARNELL AVE. WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -364 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -SS -378 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, June 6, 1988 at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by Hennepin County and the City as set forth below: RYAN AVENUE - from W. 62nd to W. 63rd Street & Parnell Avenue Estimated Cost Watermain Improvement No. P -WM -364 Option A: $45,566.36 Option B: 3,300.02 Sanitary Sewer Improvement No. P -SS -378 Option A: $30,154 The area proposed to be assessed improvements includes: Option A: The Western Addition. Option B: The Western These properties are proposed to Watermain Sanitary Sewer Option B: 12,835 for a portion of the cost of proposed 37 07 1/2 of Lots 1 through 4. Blk 3, Normandale 1/2 of Lot 4, Blk 3, Normandale Addition. be assessed as follows per assessable lot: Option A: $11,391.59 Option B: 3,300.02 Option A: $ 7,538.59 Option B: $12,835.07 Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM POLICY REGARDING LOBBYING BY CABLE APPLICANTS. Manager Rosland advised that Rogers Communications, Inc. has announced the sale of their United States cable systems. The Southwest Suburban Cable Commission (SWSCC) has recommended that each city adopt a lobbyist policy similar to that adopted by them at the time of initial franchising. It is intended by this lobbyist policy that all of the proceedings be public and to insure that individual members of city councils and their staffs are not confronted with various potential cable companies or others having an interest in the matter other than constituents. The SWSCC has drafted a schedule of various proceedings that has been--adopted to deal with the sale. Manager Rosland said-_^ that he would keep the Council informed of the proceedings and of any required action by the Council, the first being the adoption of the lobbyist policy. Motion was made by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A UNIFORM POLICY WITH RESPECT TO LOBBYING BY CABLE APPLICANTS WITH INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBERS OR STAFF WHEREAS, the City of Edina in conjunction with others comprising the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") have been requested by the Grantee of their similar Cable Communications System Franchises ( "Franchise "), to evaluate issues relating to the potential sale of the Franchise; and WHEREAS, it is the concern of this City Council that in this process all persons who may have an interest in a particular cable company (either the existing Grantee under the Franchise including its parent or affiliates, or interested purchasers of the Franchise) conduct any communications with regard to this matter with the City Council as a whole and not with individual members of the City Council or administration; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of all of those participating in the franchising process that all communications be public to avoid any sort of misunderstanding and unwarranted accusations that would otherwise develop either against the City or any of its Councilmembers or representatives; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined a policy must be adopted that will be consistently followed by its Councilmembers and staff and with the understanding that Council members of other communities will likewise adhere to a similar policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, 1. It is the policy of the Mayor and the City Council that all communications regarding any matter of the cable communications system proposed sale and transfer shall be directed to the City Council as a whole and not to an individual Council or staff member. It is not intended by this that communications by a constituent acting in a private capacity as a constituent will be prohibited. 2. It is requested that the Chairman of the SWSCC will request from the Grantee of the Franchise and other interested cable companies that they provide a list designating each person who will be the official speakers or representatives on behalf of them, and further, that the SWSCC shall provide to the City Council from time to time, a report advising it of the names of any such official speakers or representatives. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Abstaining: Richards Resolution adopted. REQUEST FOR TREE PLANTING ON MC CAULEY TRAIL DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter from Robert N. Olsen, 6709 Samuel Road, on behalf of the Indian Foothills Association requesting that the City consider a tree planting project as a buffer between McCauley Trail /Crosstown Hwy 62 /County. The association feels this project would have great aesthetic value as a border of Edina and would also serve as a sound abatement from the heavy traffic on the Crosstown Hwy 62 and County Road 18. They have estimated that it would take 210 trees, planted 35 feet apart, to continue the planting begun on McCauley Trail by Gustafson. The best price found would be Minnesota Valley Landscape with 2 inch Summit Ash planted at $125.00 a tree, totaling $26,250.00 for the entire project. Manager Rosland said the present policy regarding reforestation is that the City each year plants 50 -75 trees on the boulevards, locations for which are by draw, for a yearly budget amount of $5- 7,000. Manager Rosland said this would mean a change in City policy as there are no funds in the budget for a project like this unless the Council would like to consider it for the 1989 Budget. An alternative would be to advise the association that the City could do this if the property owners would agree to being assessed for the cost. Following discussion on the matter, the Council asked that more information on the proposed project be brought back on June 6, 1988 and to so advise Mr. Olsen. CONCERN EXPRESSED REGARDING ISSUANCE OF BEER /LIQUOR LICENSES AND ORDINANCE PROCESS. Member Smith said had two concerns: 1) issuance of beer /liquor licenses without the Council having seen the application, and 2) process for ordinances in that the prosecuting attorney is not included in the drafting process. With regard to the first concern, Member Turner explained that the role of the Council is to develop policy and criteria for issuance of the licenses which the staff then administers in the application process and brings their recommendation to the Council regarding issuance. Members Kelly and Richards and Mayor Courtney said they shared Member Turner's viewpoint. As to the second concern, Member Kelly that the role of the prosecuting attorney is to prosecute violations of ordinances which the Council has adopted and that it would mean unnecessary and additional expense to involve him in the drafting and adoption process. The Council discussed and debated the issues raised but took no formal action. COUNCIL FOLLOW -UP SESSION "WITH BARBARA AR_NEY CONFIRMED FOR JUNE 27. Member Turner advised that June 27, 1988 from 5 to 9 p.m. has been confirmed with Barbara Arney as the Council Follow -up Session to the Strategic Planning meeting of April 9. STAFF COMPLIMENTED ON COUNCIL DINNER WITH MEMBERS OF ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS. Member Turner.complimented the staff for their efforts on arranging for the Council Dinner with members of the advisory boards and commissions held on May 10 and said that it was well worthwhile and a neat new tradition. WILLIAM LEWIS LETTER CONCERNING THE EDINA RECYCLING PROGRAM. Member Turner asked that staff respond to the letter of William T. Lewis, 5409 Kellogg Avenue, regarding the Edina recycling program and that we inform him of the Recycling Commission meeting and try to involve him in the program. MEMORANDUM REGARDING NORMANDALE GOLF COURSE NOTED. Member Richards spoke to his memorandum of May 3, 1988 addressed to the City of Edina regarding Normandale Golf Course in which he advised that he had met with Mark Rauenhorst regarding the interest of the Rauenhorst family in possibly disposing of the golf course property to the City. He stated that he felt Mr. Rauenhorst should receive a response if the City does have an interest. Though the City turned down the offer some years ago, he said that this is an opportunity that the City should not pass up without at least exploring it. Member Richards said he concurred that it be referred to the Park Board. Following a brief discussion, Member Richards moved that the matter of possible acquisition of the Normandale Golf Course be referred to the Park Board for their consideration and recommendation. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. AQUATIC PARKS ARTICLE NOTED. In reference to an article on Aquatic Parks, Member Richards commented that it was sent to the Council and the Park Board for information purposes and that a copy had also been sent to the developers of the Hedberg site. CONTROLS FOR R -1 DISTRICT TO BE INVESTIGATED. Member Richards referred to earlier discussion regarding Zoning Ordinance controls for property zoned Planned Residence District. He suggested that this be referred to the Community Development and Planning Commission for consideration as to whether the Ordinance should be amended to incorporate some of those controls in the R -1 District. It was the consensus of the Council that staff refer this to the Planning Commission for their recommendations. PROPOSED BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE ADVISORY BOARD DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter from Tass von Schmidt -Pauli dated April 22, 1988 concerning the formation of a Braemar Golf Course Advisory Board that would represent the interest of golfers on all actions and activities planned for the golf course. He said he has met with Mr. Pauli and suggested his proposal be forwarded to the Park Board for their recommendations to be brought back to the Council and that he would advise Mr. Pauli of the meeting dates. Manager Rosland said he felt that if this board were to be established, the Council and the Park Board should do the appointment. Member Richards said he concurred that this be submitted to the Park Board for their comments and recommendation before the Council discusses the merits of such advisory board. HOMART SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that on May 12, 1988 staff met with representatives of Homart Development Company concerning obtaining a release relative to the Hedberg development. Homart repeated their request to be relieved of the $40,000 obligation as a condition to the release. Homart's obligation was to pay one -half the cost, or $40,000, whichever is less, toward the upgrade of the West 76th Street /France Avenue intersection. Following further discussion, it was recommended that a contribution of one -third of the improvement cost rather than one -half would be acceptable to Homart. The remaining $14,000 would be paid by United Properties. Assistant Manager Hughes explained if this was acceptable this would be incorporated into a release agreement whereby Homart would agree not to challange the Environmental Impact State on the Hedberg project. Member Richards moved that the Homart settlement agreement be amended to reduce to $26,670 the amount to be paid by Homart towards the upgrade of the West 76th Street/France Avenue intersection and to re- affirm that the City pay $40,000 as originally agreed. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Nays: Kelly Motion carried. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITIES AT BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that, as directed by the Council at the meeting of May 2, 1988, he has asked staff to develop data regarding the need for additional facilities at Braemar Golf Course and has asked the Park Board for their recommendations. FIRE DEPARTMENT ARBITRATOR'S AWARD REPORTED. Manager Rosland advised that the City has been notified of the award on the 1987 arbitration for the Fire Department and that it is within budget. The arbitrator awarded a 3.5% salary increase but did not award the $10.00 insurance increase. Also, the 24 -hour shift was awarded one additional floating holiday. He said he felt the award was relatively favorable. No action was taken. NOTICE TO VACATE SENIOR CENTER BY JANUARY 1. 1988 RECEIVED. Manager Rosland advised that a letter has been received from Rainbow Development Co., 7151 York Avenue So., giving official notice for the Edina Senior Center to vacate the premises located at 7151 York Avenue South on December 31, 1988. He added that staff is working with the Edina Community Center regarding relocation of the Center and are also looking at possibilities at Edinborough. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Turner and seconded by Member Kelly to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 5/16/88: General Fund $265,782.90, Art Center $4,219.08, Capital Fund $62,887.00, Swimming Pool Fund $758.25, Golf Course Fund $10,737.78, Recreation Center Fund $8,498.40, Gun Range Fund $590.90, Edinborough Park $12,497.30, Utility Fund $45,190.82, Liquor Dispensary Fund $82,607.08, Construction Fund $159,114.41, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $600.00, Total $653,483.92. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared the meeting adjourned at 10:40 p.m. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 6, 1988 Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith and Turner.. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards chaired the meeting. CENTENNIAL UPDATE GIVEN. Betty Hemstad and Kay Bach, Co- Chairs of the -1988 Centennial, gave an update -on Centennial activities. Betty Hemstad reported on the major events that were held in May. There were approximately 500 participants and 500 spectators for the Sports Festival. Kay Bach said that the main events for the month of June will include: Arts, Flowers and Fashions Festival with events as follows: June 1 -30 - Floral Art Exhibition; June 3 -5 - Edina Art Fair; June 1 -30 - Historical Window Displays; June 12 -30 - Juried Art Show; June 22 - "Edina Heritage" Hosta Dedication; June 22 -23 - Edina Garden Council Flower Show; June 23 - Historical Bridal Fashion Show. A Centennial Strollathon sponsored by Early Childhood Family Education Center will be on June 4; the Centennial Concert for Teens on June 17; Edinanite at the Twins on June 21 and the Centennial Run on June 6. The month of July will begin with a Centennial Celebration of July 4th starting at 10 a.m, with a parade on 50th Street, afternoon events at Lake Cornelia Park, the John Philip Sousa Memorial Band at 8:45 p.m. and a spectacular fireworks display at,9:50 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 2. 1988 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 2, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 APPROVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented by Clerk, approved and ordered placed on file. Pursuant to due notice given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as hereinafter set forth: A. CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. P -WM -364 IN THE FOLLOWING: Ryan Avenue from W. 62nd Street to W. 63rd Street & Parnell Avenue B. CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 in the following: Ryan Avenue from W. 62nd Street to W. 63rd Street & Parnell Avenue The improvements listed above affecting the same properties, public hearings were conducted concurrently. Engineer Hoffman advised that this hearing is the result of a petition from the property owner to provide sewer and water service to 6225 Ryan Avenue. Staff has analyzed the request and suggest several options. Option A - would provide normal water and sewer service to Lots 1 through 4 on Ryan Avenue. Since it is proposed to place the sewer and water lines under the street the estimated costs include restoring the street to a paved condition. Estimated cost would be $19,470.18 per lot, assessment to be spread over 20 years. ORtion B - would provide sewer and water only to 6225 Ryan Avenue (Lot 4) by plumbing in lines from Parnell Avenue for the water and from the north frontage road of Crosstown 62 for the sewer. Estimated cost would be $16,135.09 to be assessed against one lot only (6225 Ryan Avenue), assessment to be spread over 10 years. Option C - Upon receiving notice of the hearing, . the other primary property owner (Lots 1 through 3) has indicated an interest in water and sewer service and indicated a willingness to give easements across the backyards of the lots to allow installation of the utilities. Estimated cost for water and sewer for three lots (Lots 2, 3 and 4) would be $10,402.80 per lot, assessment to be spread over 10 years. Staff would recommend construction of sewer and water improvements per Option C, subject to the property owners granting easements for installation and maintenance of the utilities. No objection or comment being heard, Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption, subject to property owners granting easements for installation and maintenance of the utilities: RESOLUTION ORDERING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that this Council heretofore caused notice of hearing to be duly published and mailed to owners of each parcel within the area proposed to be assessed on the following proposed improvements: CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -P -364 AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -P -378 and at the hearing held at the time and place specified in said notice, the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent factors, does here determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement including all proceedings which may be necessary in construction and maintenance of such improvements; that said improvements are hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -364 and SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. SS -378 and the area to be specially assessed therefor shall include the Western 1/2 of Lots 1 through 3, Blk 3, Normandale Addition. Motion for adoption of Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Resolution adopted. the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.. Turner, Richards PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR JERRY'S ENTERPRISES REFERRED TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to refer the request for preliminary rezoning (PID Planned Industrial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District and preliminary plat to the Community Development and Planning Commission as requested by the proponents. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *HEARING ON PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PINEWOOD TOWNHOMES (HARVEY SWENSON) CONTINUED TO 6/20/88. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to continue the public hearing on the request for preliminary rezoning.(R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2 Planned Residence District) and preliminary plat for Pinewood Townhomes (Harvey Swenson) to June 20, 1988 as requested by proponent. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *REQUEST FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND REZONING FOR 7100 FRANCE AVENUE WITHDRAWN. Motion was made"by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to acknowledge and accept withdrawal by the proponent of the request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning (POD -1 Planned Office District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District for 7100 France Avenue (Gabbert). Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. FINAL REZONING TO R -2 DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR LANDMARK ADDITION. Planner Larsen presented the request for final rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District and final plat approval for Landmark Addition, generally located east of Lincoln Drive and south of West 7th Street extended. He recalled that on May 16, 1988 the Council approved preliminary rezoning to R -2 for double bungalow development and preliminary plat for the 5 lot subdivision. All conditions imposed at preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval have been met. Subdivision dedication for this property was satisfied by an earlier land dedication (Parkwood Knolls 20th Addition). Staff would recommend final rezoning and final plat approval for the subject property. No objection being heard, Member Turner moved final rezoning and Second Reading of Ordinance No. 825 -A25 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) BY ADDING TO THE DOUBLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT (R -2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. 825 of the City is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Double Dwelling Unit District (Sub- District R -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: Outlot C, Parkwood_Knolls 20th Addition except that part which lies southerly of a line-which bears North .61 degrees 47 minutes 31 seconds East from the northeast corner of Outlot B, Interlachen Hills 3rd Addition. For purposes of this description, the north.line of said Outlot B is assumed to bear North 87 degrees 51 minutes 16 seconds East." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for Second Reading of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk Member Turner moved final approval and adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR LANDMARK ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "LANDMARK ADDITION ", platted by The Lincoln Drive Partnership, a Minnesota general partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of June 6, 1988 be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Resolution adopted. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DAYCARE SERVICES WITH MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR DAYCARE SERVICES WITH GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE ASSOCIATION AND AUTHORIZING ASSIGNMENT OF THE AGREEMENT'S ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, the City of Edina has executed a Joint Powers Agreement with Hennepin County, thereby agreeing to participate in a grant application under the Urban County designation provided for in the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and, WHEREAS, part of the authorized activity for Year XIV is the support of daycare services through the administrative agency known as the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Block Grant program as administered through the Urban Hennepin County requires that each city funding daycare activity with Community Development Block Grant monies must enter into a Public Service Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association; and, WHEREAS, the Public Service Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association allows the City to authorize Hennepin County to discharge the responsibilities of the City regarding the administration of the daycare program; BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute an Agreement with the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association for child daycare services for Year XIV of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and Development be requested to directly discharge the responsibilities of the City regarding the administration of this program for Year XIV, as provided for in the Public Service Agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. REPORT PRESENTED REGARDING DAY CARE IN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. Planner Craig Larsen stated that the report regarding day care in single family homes is presented in response to Member Turner's request that staff review its policy regulating day care. He said that the State Department of Human Services generates rules for licensing day care facilities which rules are administered by Hennepin County. By State Statute cities may not limit residential day care to less than 12 children. Several types of day care licenses are issued by the County in single family homes. They vary due to the total number of children, age of children and number of .care givers. The City's policy has been to permit all but two of these license categories: 1) license for 14 children requiring 2 care givers, and 2) license for a specialized infant /toddler day care facility for 9 children also requiring 2 care givers. These were not allowed because they required outside employees which is not allowed by the Zoning Ordinance standards for "customary home occupations ". Planner Larsen explained that a review of the Zoning Ordinance indicates that we have erred in classifying day care as a customary home occupation. The Zoning Ordinance distinguishes day care from other home occupations by making it a permitted accessory use in the R -1 District provided it is licensed by the State. By making day care a permitted accessory use, the Ordinance does not limit the use in the same restrictive manner it does other customary home occupations. Specifically, a licensed day care operation with 12 or fewer children could have an employee who does not reside at.the residence. The intent of the Ordinance was to provide for special treatment for day care. Staff would suggest the City change its administrative policy to allow all licensed family and group family day care operations with 12 or fewer children to operate in single family homes. This would allow all categories of residential licenses except the license for 14 children. Since both State law and the Zoning Ordinance single out day care for special treatment, it would not establish an undesirable precedent applicable to other home occupations. Planner Larsen concluded that this change in policy will be put into practice in the future. Member Turner expressed her thanks for the research and report. No action was taken. ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 (WINE LICENSING) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards stated that First Reading had been granted to Ordinance No. 902 -A5, the wine licensing ordinance, at the last meeting following considerable discussion regarding the language of the ordinance. Member Smith commented that he felt the ordinance was still unclear. Member Smith made a motion to amend the first sentence of the ordinance as presented at First Reading to read as follows: "No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a meal." Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. Member Smith then moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 902 -A5 as amended: ORDINANCE NO. 902 -A5 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 902 TO CLARIFY THE REOUIREMENT THAT A MEAL BE CONSUMED WITH WINE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph (a) of Section 40 of Part H of Ordinance No. 902 is hereby amended to read as follows: "(a) No person shall be sold, served or consume wine who does not order a meal. The licensee shall advise all patrons of the requirements of this C't $ril •la.�5 d vr:... ��` Y.Y`;. u.. -�'�y i n... paragraph (a) either through placards displayed in the restaurant or notices contained in the menu and wine list." Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall:_ Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Ordinance adopted. ATTEST: Mayor City Clerk *BID AWARDED FOR BRIDGE DECK REPAIRS (W. 78TH STREET BRIDGE). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for award of bid for bridge deck repairs (W. 78th Street Bridge) to recommended low bidder, Progressive Contractors, Inc., at $33,376.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. *CLUB LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve issuance of Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor License renewals for the Edina Country Club and the Interlachen Country Club. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. ALLOCATION OF FUNDS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE BY NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT NOTED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District advising that they have allocated $25,000.00 to the City of Edina to repair damage resulting from flooding and erosion following the July, 1987 rain storms. Reimbursement of costs incurred will be made based upon receipt of an invoice from the City and certified by the Engineer indicating that the work has been completed. He said this is for the Council's information and that no action is needed. CITY WATER SYSTEM REPORT PRESENTED: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW WELL AND WATER TOWER AUTHORIZED. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the Council authorized staff to update the City Master Plan for Water Systems in June of 1987. The Master Plan update has been completed and the basic recommendations indicate an ultimate need for 3 additional wells and a one million gallon tower. Additional recommendations are: 1) completing a water main loop from Braemar Arena to West 78th Street and 2) installing an electronic supervisory control system. The total cost for the whole system in 1988 dollars is $2,500,000. The report further recommends that one additional well be drilled as soon as possible and that the one million gallon tower be installed in light of storage requirements that provide good fire protection as recommended by the Fire Chief. In support of the Master Plan recommendations, Engineer Hoffman explained that in the Edina community water pressures vary from 40 to 105 PSI depending on the land elevation, e.g. the high points experience the low pressures. He advised -,that at present the average day consumption of water is 7,890,000 gallons /day with the maximum at 21,160,000 gallons /day. Ultimate consumption as determined by the consultant would be average day consumption of 8,870,000 gallons /day with the maximum at 23,610,000 gallons /day. The system design assumes using 90% of well capacity and 180 gallons per capita consumption. Current storage capacity is 6,000,000 MGD and ultimate storage should be 7,000,000 MGD. Staff recommendation would be for Council to authorize that engineering plans and specifications be developed for a new well and water tower. Approximately one year is required to put a new well into operation. Engineer Hoffman stated that initial costs will be funded from the utility fund and approximately $10- 15,000 from engineering funds. Estimated cost for the new well and tower is $1,300,000. The utility fund has a reserve of $1,600,000. The Finance Department will be bringing to the Council a financial statement showing the water /sewer charges and a recommendation that the rates be raised to pick up some of the costs. It was noted that a letter had been received from residents of Dublin Circle expressing their concern about the low water pressure to their homes during periods of dry and hot weather. Member Turner asked at what point staff would recommend adding the two additional wells. Engineer Hoffman said the recommendation is to locate the first well at Edina High School and the tower at Van Valkenburg Park. The second well would be in relationship to the Hedberg development, Phase II at the southeast corner. The third well would be at the northwest corner when final development is completed in that area. Member Smith asked about the impact of the current water system on fire insurance rates for Edina. Chief Paulfranz responded that we are doing as well as we can with our water system except for the recent crisis periods. If the City had a bad experience during a crisis period that would probably reflect on fire insurance rates. Member Kelly said she was concerned about the effect a change in land use for the Meadowbrook Golf Course would have on Edina's water system. Engineer Hoffman explained that there are no wells involved there, only a storm water system. There being no further comment, Member Smith made a motion authorizing that engineering plans and specification be developed for a new well and water tower. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. STORM WATER CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN DISCUSSED: PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD. Engineer Hoffman recalled that the City's storm water plan had been discussed at a special meeting on May 16, 1988. Following that discussion it was concluded that staff should look at placing the storm water system .into a capital plan as we do with streets and the sanitary sewer system. Staff has spent considerable time in inspecting the entire area of the City as to storm water drainage, etc. He said it was important to develop a design that would provide a uniform level of protection for all developed properties. Also, to look at remaining undeveloped areas as part of the overall design. Staff would recommend that a 10 -year storm water capital improvement plan be developed, that projects be prioritized based on lowest cost /maximum benefit, and that the capital improvement plan be brought to public hearing on September 12, 1988. As to funding, the recommendation is to create a stormwater utility fund which would generate funds to pay for maintenance and or /upgrade of the storm water system. Recommended public hearing date for establishment of a stormwater utility fund is August 15, 1988. Rates would be established for residential property and rates for commercial property would be based on amount of hard surface on each property. Engineer Hoffman concluded by stating if the storm water plan proceeds as outlined construction could begin before year end. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked Engineer Hoffman to review for the audience what has occurred since the July rain storms. Engineer Hoffman explained that at the end of the storm cleanup process last year staff began analyzing the topography of the entire City, collected information, broke it down into small drainage areas by acreage, took elevations in the field to determine temporary flood storage, etc. On February 22, 1988 a report was given to the Council on how the July 1987 storm and other storms related to the general storm water designs of the City. At the meeting of May 16, 1988 it was the consensus to deal with this issue by a capital plan process. Member Smith asked what level of protection the plan as proposed would bring if we have another storm like last year. Engineer Hoffman said that nothing we do will prevent a reoccurrence of what happened on July 23, 1987, it may lessen the severity, but it all depends on the type of storm. In talking to other cities, he said no city can assure protection from any given storm at any given time. What we are talking about are the 100 year events, the 10 year pipe design, looking at a policy issue of moving water from private flooding to a public area, etc. Speaking in support of upgrading the storm water system were: Paul Scully, 6024 Leslee Lane; Vince McConville, 7008 Sally Lane; Bruce Hill, 6832 Sally Lane; Joan Schmidt, 7000 Sally Lane; Wayne Alexander, 7028 Sally Lane, and Tapan Bhattacharya, 6808 Sally Lane. Following further discussion, Member Kelly moved to authorize staff to develop the following for public hearing: A) Proposed 10 year Capital Plan (September 12), B) Finish Analysis for Determining Appropriate Level of Service, and C) Proposed Utility Fund (August 15). Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. PROPOSED LMC DUES ADJUSTMENT DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland referred to a letter from the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) dated May 20, 1988 in which they proposed-a constitutional amendment for a dues adjustment not to exceed 5% for 1989 -90, 6% for 1990 -91 and 7% for 1991 -92. The amendment will be voted on at the June 9 meeting of the LMC Conference and a response is needed from the Council regarding the amendment. He said that the Council has been debating whether to retain its membership in the LMC each year at budget time. Dues for 1987 -88 were $13,267; for 1988 -89 are $13,930, for 1989 -90 will be $14,767 and for 1990 -91 will be $15,802. Manager Rosland commented that from the standpoint of fiscal and tax programs the LMC seems unable to benefit the City. However, for informational issues, lobbying and other program they are of some benefit. The other aspect is do we participate so that we can hopefully have an affect on the various programs. He recommended that the City stay a member at the present time. Total membership dues for the three lobbying groups in which the City has membership is just under $35,000 (LMC, AMM and MLC). Member Turner said she would support staying in the LMC and the proposed constitutional amendment but said the cities should receive information to justify the size of the dues increase. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards commented that he felt the LMC is an organization that is out -state or small town oriented. He said the perception is that the well -to -do communities who have a strong tax base should help finance many of the services for small communities. It seems that every tax increase is passed on across the board and those who do not avail themselves of services from LMC are paying more and more because their base is higher; that it is a difficult issue to ask us to approve those percentage increases compared to the rate of inflation over the last few years. He said he was concerned about giving a blanket authorization for the proposed increases and would urge the Council Members who will attend the meeting to speak on behalf of the City of Edina and ask who is getting those services and ask that a user fee be explored for the LMC. Member Smith said we should vote against it; that we are not being well served. Following further discussion, Mayor Pro -Tem Richards asked Member Smith prior to budget hearings to get background information from staff as to what we pay each organization and formulate a summary as to what benefit we get from each organization. Member Smith moved rejection of the proposed amendment. Motion failed for lack of second. Member Turner then moved that those attending speak for the Council at the annual meeting on June 9, 1988 reflecting the points raised: 1) justification for any increase (more information on financial assumptions used), 2) explore the user fee concept, 3) express concern that suburban communities continue to pay an unfair share. Motion was seconded by Member Kelly. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Motion carried. PLANTINGS ON MC CAULEY TRAIL DISCUSSED. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks & Recreation, recalled that at the last meeting the Council had briefly discussed the request from Robert N. Olsen, on behalf of the Indian Foothills Association, to consider a tree planting project along McCauley Trail. The Council had asked that more information be brought back to the Council. Staff would recommend that the City not participate in this - program because this has. not been our policy in the past. As has been in other cases, staff would recommend encouraging the neighbors to participate in the program themselves by purchasing, planting and maintaining the trees as a continuing beautification by the residents of the community. He said he had talked with Mr. Olsen about the recommendation and had also talked with Ann Fallon, 6417 Timber Ridge, who had written on behalf of the residents of Timber Ridge asking that the City plant ground cover and shrubbery on their retaining wall. Robert Olsen, 6709 Samuel Road, spoke in support of their proposed tree project on McCauley Trail. Bob Teese, 6705 Samuel Road, stated that maybe the residents could raise some of the money but would like the City's cooperation. Member Turner commented that the proposal is a marvelous idea and that the City could give advice for such a project but would support this as private involvement. Member Smith said that there is too big a squeeze for City funds on other projects such as the storm water plan to realistically find money for the proposed tree project. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards suggested to Mr. Olsen and Mr. Teese that they continue to discuss and get advice from Mr. Kojetin regarding the project if the residents wish to undertake it as a private project. BOARD /COMMISSION TERM EXPIRATION DATES CLARIFIED. Manager Rosland referred to Ordinance No. 102 adopted on May 16, 1988 limiting terms of service of individuals appointed by the Council to boards, commissions or committee and asked for clarification of eligibility for re- appointment. If an individual has not served 12 years when their term is up can they be re- appointed if another term would result in their serving more than 12 years. Following discussion, it the consensus of the Council that such an individual could be re- appointed and that this would apply beginning January 1, 1990. PROPOSED MLC LAWSUIT DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland advised that the Municipal Legislative Commission (MLC) last week voted to proceed with the process to sue the State of Minnesota on the constitutionality of a portion of the new tax bill. The Operating Committee has developed four plans: 1) fiscal - cost and funding; 2) who will join the MLC in the lawsuit; 3) public relations; and 4) legal counsel to carry forward the lawsuit. The member city councils will have the opportunity to vote on the issue if the committee decides to proceed. Theme- portion of the new bill that will be challenged is tax disparity. He explained that the tax law would bring everyone to a mill levy limit - if you spend over 125 mills the State will pay for that difference and if you spend less than 125 mills you pay your own freight. Manager Rosland also presented facts and figures on the new tax laws regarding State Aid and its affect on the City of Edina. Member Turner advised that the AMM Board was asked that the AMM join in the suit. The Board asked the AMM staff to come back with more facts and figures and the Board will consider at its next meeting a vote to join.the suit. Member Kelly asked if the City of Minneapolis has been asked to join the suit. Manager Rosland said they are asking everybody to join in the suit but at this stage no firm commitments have been made. Mayor Pro -Tem Richards said he would like to see a specific written report with a proposal. He questioned if a judge or panel of judges would change the political wisdom of the elected officials of the State. He questioned spending time and money needlessly and said he would like an opinion from the City Attorney as to the likelihood of success of the suit. Manager Rosland said the Council would get the report when the four plans are developed and the Council could then make their decision. Following further debate, no formal action was taken. *HEARING DATE SET FOR TRANSFER OF CABLE FRANCHISE TO NEW GRANTEE. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina that in accordance with the applicable provisions of Minnesota Statute 238 this Council shall meet on Monday, July 11, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall to consider in public hearing the proposed transfer of the City's cable television franchise to a new Grantee; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper ten days prior to the hearing date. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED IN OPPOSITION TO TRANSFER OF JURY TRIALS TO GOVERNMENT CENTER. Manager Rosland advised that an executive committee of Hennepin County District Court has approved a proposal to transfer jury trials from the Brookdale, Southdale and Ridgedale court facilities to the Hennepin County Government Center. He said the Prosecuting Attorney and staff feel strongly that we should object to the transfer of jury trials to the Government Center. Member Turner introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO TRANSFERRING JURY TRIALS FROM THE SOUTHDALE COURT FACILITY TO DOWNTOWN HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER WHEREAS, the City Council of Edina is the official governing body of the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina consented to moving the Edina municipal court facility to Southdale based on Hennepin County's representation that all Edina court and jury trials would be conducted at the Southdale facility; and WHEREAS, the Southdale court facility has sufficient courtroom space to accommodate the handling of all misdemeanor court and jury trials for municipalities located in Division IV; and WHEREAS, the City has been informed that an executive committee of the Hennepin County District Court judges voted recently to transfer the handling of Edina jury trials from the Southdale facility to the downtown Hennepin County Government Center; and WHEREAS, the entire Hennepin County bench is scheduled to vote on the above proposal on June 6, 1988; and WHEREAS, the-Edina City Attorney's Office presently assigns two attorneys to handle criminal prosecution and moving Edina's jury trials from Southdale to the Hennepin County Government Center would strain its ability to make all required court appearances including arraignments, pretrials and court trials, and thereby likely result in cases being dismissed; and WHEREAS, the Edina Police Department is strongly opposed to the proposed move because of the increased time and cost involved in travelling downtown and the fact that police officers can currently be working and "on -call" when jury trials are processed at the Southdale facility; and WHEREAS, it is the experience of the City Attorney's Office that civilian witnesses are often reluctant to travel downtown because of excess time lost from work; unfamiliarity with downtown; and cost and availability of parking and that this general reluctance will make it more difficult to successfully prosecute cases; and WHEREAS, it is highly likely that suburban jury trials would have low priority for jury assignment in the downtown facility and that a backlog of cases would inevitably develop; and WHEREAS, moving jury trials downtown would further distance the residents of Edina from their court system and constitute a waste of taxpayers money expended for construction of the Southdale facility; and WHEREAS, the transfer of jury trials from the Southdale facility to the Hennepin County Government Center will result in substantial increases in the total cost of prosecution for the City of Edina, including loss of police and attorney work time, increased overtime pay, and probably increases in personnel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA IN REGULAR MEETING ASSEMBLED, that the City Council strongly opposes the proposed transfer of Edina's jury trials from -the Southdale court facility to the--downtown Hennepin County Government Center for the foregoing reasons. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be sent to each member of the Hennepin County Commissioners, Edina's representatives in the State Legislature and the mayors of each municipality located in Division II ( Brookdale), Division III ( Ridgedale) and Division IV ( Southdale). Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner Nays: Richards Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED RECOGNIZING THAT SERVICE BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS IS PART OF OFFICIAL DUTIES. Manager Rosland advised that a member of the Council has been concerned about liability in connection with serving on non -City Boards and Commissions and wanted to know if they would be indemnified by the City. Regarding compliance with the applicable Statute 466.07, Attorney Erickson has recommended that the Council adopt a resolution that would recognize that service by Council Members on boards and commissions is part of their official duties. Member Smith introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THAT SERVICE BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS AT REQUEST OR DIRECTION OF CITY COUNCIL IS PART OF THE PERFORMANCE OF, AND WITHIN THE SCOPE OF, THEIR OFFICIAL DUTIES BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina, as follows: WHEREAS, Council Members, from time to time, are.requested or directed by the City Council to serve on various boards and commissions, which service is for the benefit of, or is in the best interests of, the City. It is, therefore, recognized and acknowledge by the City Council that service heretofore or hereafter undertaken or to be undertaken by Council Members on such boards or commissions has been and shall be a part of the.performance of, and within the scope of, the.official duties of such Council Members,. Motion for adoption of, the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Richards Resolution adopted. QUESTION ASKED REGARDING HOOK -UP TO SEWER AND WATER WHEN HOME SOLD. Member Kelly asked if the City had an ordinance requiring a home without sewer and water to be connected to sewer and water when that home is sold. Engineer Hoffman explained that if they have good well water they can stay on that forever. They have two years to hook -up to the sewer if the sewer goes by the house unless they obtain a variance. CONCERN REGARDING TAX INCREMENT BONDS /50TH AND FRANCE DISTRICT. Member Kelly said she would like to_ see the City retire the tax increment bonds held by the 50th and France Tax Increment District, that she was concerned that we have a lot of property in tax increment districts. Member Turner asked when would be the appropriate time to analyze that. Gordon Hughes responded that the Council was given the figures last November when the project hearing was held for the theatre and ramp expansion. Those figures focused on what the annual debt is compared to the tax increments and did not focus on when the bonds will be paid off or how soon the district should be terminated. He said those figures could be made available. Following discussion, it was informally agreed that the Manager determine when the Finance Director is able to bring back that information. IMPACT OF CITY OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING BILL AND COMPARABLE WORTH CHANGES ASKED. Member Turner said she would like to see a short analysis of how the tax increment financing bill affects the City of Edina. Also, how the comparable worth changes . affect the City, if at all. APPOINTMENT TO TRANSPORTATION STUDY BOARD DISCUSSED. Member Turner asked if someone representing the City should be appointed to the new formed Transportation Board approved by the Legislature. STATUS OF LINK ROAD PROJECT ASKED. Member Turner asked what the status was of the Link Road project. Engineer Hoffman said the City is still negotiating on that project. CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve payment of the following claims dated 6/6/88: General Fund $248,640.95, Art Center $7,988.28, Capital Fund $26,338.41, Swimming Pool Fund $1,624.01, Golf Course Fund $25,327.57, Recreation Center Fund $29,153.93, Gun Range Fund $927.64, Edinborough Park $8,272.67,.Utility Fund $261,809.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $11,939.82, Construction Fund $1,725.00, Total $623,747.89; and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 4/30/88: General Fund $205,028.16, Art Center $1,134.61, Swimming Pool Fund $124.72, Golf Course Fund $4,129.63, Recreation Center Fund $7,097.28, Fun Range Fund $520.18, Edinborough Park $11,224.78, Utility Fund $22,566.54, Liquor Dispensary Fund $253,916.73, Total $505,742.63. Motion carried on rollcall vote, four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Smith for adjournment was seconded by Member Kelly and carried. Adjournment at 9:58 p.m. City Clerk 1� •�9 I ' lam A. �I \I.1 �,( J c i J J " REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: 17 June, 1988 Subject: Public Hearing S -45 Sidewalk, W. 62nd Street from France Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue Agenda Item # TTT_A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Authorize project if majority of neighborhood concurs with project. Assessment options would be to assess all properties as proposed or assess all properties except West 62nd Street. Info /Background: City Council conducted a public hearing in May with the proposal of an asphalt path on the south side of West 62nd Street. The proposal was to minimize cost and done with the expectation that the roadway would-be rebuilt and the path removed and replaced with a concrete sidewalk. However, during the hearing it was evident that a concrete sidewalk should be constructed instead of asphalt. The West 62nd Street neighbors oppose the walk even though all neighbors south of West 62nd Street would be assessed for the construction. The new estimated assessment amount would be $504.00 per lot. The Traffic Safety Committee reviewed the safety issue on West 62nd Street. The Committee heard reports from the Traffic Enforcement Unit Officer who indicated some speeding on the street although it tended to occur primarily during peak hours. The action of the Committee was to recommend further en- forcement and the placing of oversize speed limit signs to attempt to educate the drivers on the street. The.present sidewalk proposed would be the eventual proposal that would normally follow the sidewalk plan from the Comprehensive Plan. It would not have high priority due to the good sight distance along the street and the lower volume as compared to Wooddale which does not have a sidewalk yet. CITY , 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861 REMINDER NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SIDEWALK Improvement No. P -S -45 West 62nd Street from France Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue (South Side) The Edina City Council will meet on Monday, June 20, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street to hold a formal Public Hearing on the construction of sidewalk on the south side of West 62nd Street from France Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue. This hearing has been called as a result of a petition from residents in, this area for better pedestrian access to other walkways and Pamela Park. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing is a continuation of the May 16th Council hearing. This hearing is considered formal since it is proposed to pay the entire cost of the improvement from assessments., Under present City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of the City. The estimated cost for the south side is $43,371.97. The proposed assessment is $504.33 per lot over an area bounded by West 62nd Street on the north to the Crosstown 62 on the south. The sidewalk is -proposed to be five (5) feet wide and constructed of concrete. The, alignment will be varied to protect ,existing property features. to the greatest extent possible. The proposed project would be constructed in 1988. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8 :00 A.M. and 4 :30 P.M., Monday through Friday. The City. Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. Thank you. )' F- rancis J. Hoff an, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer �r 4gl��f t; o e cm REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman Director of Pubic orks Date: 17 June, 1988 Subject: Noise Impact Studies Recommendation: Agenda Item # III . B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance If long term comprehensive plan amendment on noise impacts is desired, pursue legislative program through AMM for cooperative projects with motor vehicle excise tax as the method of funding. Info /Background: This hearing is a continuation of analysis of the noise impacts in the City along major highways. The staff and consultants will present information on the follow- ing agenda. A. Research of Property Values B. MNDOT Highway Repair /Fence Heights, Heavy Truck Impact C. Develop Neighborhood Funding Level - and Opinion on Barriers if No Financial Participation and Prepare Slides to Demonstrate Aesthetics from Highway Side and Property Side. D. Use of Asphalt on Highway as Noise Mitigation Procedure and Substitute Noise Technology for Masking Traffic Noise E. Seek Hennepin County Input - on Overall Issue Similar to Solid Waste Initiatives F. Long Term Reduction of Noise Impacts - Develop Comprehensive Plan Amendment G. Pursuing Legislative Program - Seek Legislation which Allows State to Participate in Cooperative Projects Attached is additional information from Strgar- Roscoe - Fausch and the survey card. STR,GAR- ROSCOE- EAUSCH, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL ■ STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS ■ LAND SURVEYORS File No. 0880965 MEMORANDUM TO: Francis J. Hoffman, P.E. City of.Edina FROM: Peter A. Fausch, P.E. James M. Kranig, P.E. DATE: June 16, 1988 SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL NOISE RESEARCH REQUESTED BY CITY COUNCIL FOR JUNE 20, 1988 MEETING Several areas were identified by the City Council as needing additional research for the June 20, 1988 City Council Meeting. The following areas were identified as involving Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. (SRF): 1. Status of Mn /DOT repair of the pavement north of the Highway 100 bridge over Minnehaha Creek to eliminate the cause of the heavy truck impact noise. 2. Survey of area residents to determine opinions on noise walls and level of financial participation. .3. Use of asphalt and active noise .reduction technology to mitigate traffic noise levels. PAVEMENT REPAIR Our investigation indicates that the likely cause of the heavy truck impact noise is, a sag in the pavement. It is located adjacent to the catch basins north of the bridge over the Minnehaha Creek. The cause of the sag is likely the settling around the drainage system connected to the catch basins. 1 Suite 150, One Carlson Parkway North, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 (612) 475 -0010 • FAX No. (612) 475 -2429 i 1 As a result of meetings with Mn /DOT, City staff and SRF, Mn /DOT committed itself to solving the heavy truck impact noise problem. The next step will be to survey the pavement surface to identify the extent of the sag to determine whether this is the cause of the problem. If it is determined to be the cause, Mn /DOT will then identify which method to use to eliminate the sacs. OPINION SURVEY OF RESIDENTS The opinion survey was sent to 280 residents and 198 responses (710) were received by the indicated return deadline. The results are as follows: Ouestion 1. Does traffic noise from Highway 100 bother you? Approximately 32 percent of the respondents said traffic noise from Highway 100 does bother them and 68 percent said it does not. Ouestiori 2. If you answered yes to number 1, during which hours of the day? Approximately 65 percent of those answering yes to number 1 said the noise bothered them during the nighttime hours of 10 P.M. to 6 a.m. This is approximately 21 percent of the total responses. Approximately 78 percent answering yes said noise bothered them during the 6 a.m. to 7 a.m. period (250 of the total). Approximately 87 percent answering yes said noise bothered them during the daytime hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. (28% of the total). Question 3. Would you want 15 foot high noise walls along both sides of Highway 100 (where fences are now) from W. 50th Street to the north City limits if the cost is not assessed to you and the public can participate in.selecting wall type and landscaping design? Approximately 38 percent of all respondents said they would want noise walls and 62 percent said they would not want noise walls even if there was no direct cost to them and they could help determine the wall material and landscaping details. Approximately 6 percent more favored the walls than those who indicated they were bothered by noise. This can probably be attributed to such reasons as wanting to support neighbors close to the highway where noise levels are higher, wanting to minimize noise levels even if they are not at bothersome levels or wanting a visual screen. c Question 4. If you answered yes to number 3, would you also want the wall if there would be a special tax assessment to your property of ($200, $400, $600, $800 or $1,000 per year for 10 years)? Approximately 20 percent of the total respondents indicated that they would be willing to contribute some amount toward noise walls through assessments. Of these people, 51 percent said $200 per year for 10 years was the maximum, 38 percent said $400, 20 .percent said $600 and 13 percent said $1,000. Given these responses., the average funding level for those who would agree to assessments would be $530 per year. This would yield a ltotal of $20,600 per year and $206,000 for the full assessment period. The responses were also analyzed to determine if there were any clear patterns based on general locations of residences. There did not appear to be any clear pattern to the residents who failed to respond to the survey as they were scattered throughout the survey area. However, two patterns did emerge where similar responses were clustered in specific areas. First, those who indicated that they are bothered by the noise generally are within the area which exceeds 65 decibels (A- scale) during daytime hours (see Figure 1). A small group of residents outside the 65 decibel area who are located on the north side of the creek near Browndale Avenue also indicated they are bothered by noise. The second pattern which emerged involved those who are willing to pay: some.. amount. through assessments. These respondents are essentially a subset of those bothered by the noise (see Figure 2). NON -WALL NOISE REDUCTION-TECHNIQUES The use of bituminous pavement as a means of reducing highway traffic noise was investigated. Several reports detailing Mn /DOT research of the impact of pavement type on highway traffic noise have been reviewed. The results of the review are presented below. New bituminous pavement is somewhat quieter than new concrete pavement. However, the difference is at a level that is barely perceptible to the average person. In addition, noise levels increase as the bituminous pavement ages while noise levels decrease as concrete initially ages. Therefore, there is no overall long -term noise advantage of using bituminous rather than concrete pavement. 3 lip m' R CM,S.._ Tn Rl t J T..` rit d g . R 4 CMA °1� o:/} � ( r �Y e I i s' \� -+Y1 - V'�(� _ \ �. : I'j • ARDFN vARic.! j TM1.9D" r� s�PARK AD j ST >: ' r /, � •c � f �, -� *�. -�—� -'"ter � t C , M� o rp y �' ill ` � i �`•.. R�`�.': ,V � , 7/ ^r�' 1 tt�pl � � r .. Jli' -�"�• • � - I � S� - S.L � ` - _dam) A � ... \ \� •. ' "� '1 a •e •sr — I I '— R ':� I .' � X- f 6 x (V _ J�JI /' _.iF. '•,r � �.. ij }N — : « �„5 '_ , -'. ' _ 5 h t':,r j." rte-.• � ,_ � � . " :., ,� T. I f., 5 \' \ �i; \ _� •I I' _ ,= \ _ \ • i. 'r�> w t�TOt !I? , 0 7 , 6` a _ DES !'' F '^ BOTHERED BY .NOISE FROM HWY . 100 r. 65 DECIBELS (DAYTIME) D STRGAR- ROSCOE- FAUSCH,INC. CITY OF EDINA FIGURE ® CONSULTING ENGINEERS MA%v r.TATlu IVIL•mrrn'w.6W %FF1' OPINION SURVEY RESPONSE rwcn •r•rrnu TO QUESTIONS ONE AND TWO COMMISSION NO. 0880965 HIGHWAY 100 NOISE IMPACT STUDY 7 E. CA kc iI•I ,� p.0 _.fi . 1_� Ni, �f_ �f�:.;,. ! _ �; 3 — r I�;•'r., ..r �� �'r: o _ o ADD r pl . .aHoEn e°wa/vner rNrgn r, ` P4RX .lRB_ '. _, ' o I .� •�'�. ' ^��- •ms`s —����� r��•` Ar C. 'rERR I At ml h • , ,. 7 �� Via,• = { w R.L.S, Iq . . , � N-s r ' ' WILLING TO PARTICIPATE IN FUNDING 65 DECIBELS (DAYTIME) STRGAR•ROSCOE•FAUSCH,INC. CITY OF EDINA FIGURE CONSULTING ENGINEERS r.,,.rr....rer,nr.,,.,�. n,•,,,..,,.,r,:,.r «�. OPINION SURVEY RESPONSE urn r, n�ruu TO QUESTIONS THREE AND FOUR 2 COMMISSION NO. 0880965 HIGHWAY 100 NOISE IMPACT STUDY y { A thin bituminous overlay on concrete was found to lose its initial noise advantage very quickly while a thick bituminous overlay was found to be similar to bituminous pavement. However, bituminous overlays can delaminate with age and could result in creating a heavy truck impact noise condition. In addition, heavy trucks determine the L10 noise level, i.e., the noise level exceeded ten percent of the time period or the loudest six minutes of an'hour while automobiles determine the L50 noise level. Truck noise is dominated by engine and exhaust noise so that pavement has only a negligible effect on truck noise. The advantage of a new bituminous pavement on automobile noise levels is barely perceptible. The result is, pavement has essentially no effect on the L10 noise level and has a barely perceptible effect on L50 noise levels. Active noise reduction technology was mentioned by one citizen at the previous City Council meeting as a possible means of noise reduction. This is the use of amplifiers to produce out -of -phase sound which cancels the undesirable sound. Our investigation indicates that the primary research in this field is in areas such as ventilation fans, automobile and airplane interiors and industrial machine operations where the noise is confined.and has very predictable characteristics. We could find no research in active noise reduction for highways which appears to be applicable for this -area in the near future. NOISE SURVEY 0 The following is a brief survey about noise and possible construction of noise walls along Highway 100 between West 50th Street and the north City limits of Edina. Please complete and mail back by June 10, 1988. If you have any questions, contact Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works, City of Edina, at (612) 927 -8861. Does traffic noise from Highway 100 bother you? (circle yes or no) Yes NO If you answered yes to #1, during which hours of the day? (circle all times that apply) Night Early Morning Day (10 p.m. to 6 a.m.) (6 a.m. to 7 a.m.) (7 a.m. to 10 p.m.) 3. Would you want 15 foot high noise walls along both sides of Highway 100 (where fences are now) from W. 50th St. to the north City limits if the cost is not assessed to you and the public can participate in selecting wall type and landscaping design: (circle yes or no) Yes NO 4. If you answered yes to #3, would you also want the walls if there would be a special tax assessment to your property of: (circle yes or no for each) a. $200 per year for 10 years? Yes NO b. $400 per year for 10 years? Yes No C. $600 per year for 10 years? Yes NO d. $800 per year for 10 years? Yes NO e. $1,000 per year for 10 years? Yes No 5. Comments Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Edina is in the process of updating its Strategic Plan to deal with issues resulting from the continued urbanization of the City; and WHEREAS, highway traffic noise has been identified as one of these issues; and WHEREAS, the issue appears to be a metropolitan as well as an individual City issue, given the widespread problem in Edina and the many other cities in the metropolitan area with similar residential proximity to major roadways; and WHEREAS, it is felt that a metropolitan approach is needed to address the traffic noise problem which stems from regional highway traffic; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina considers the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to be the appropriate metropolitan agency to investigate the issue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby requests the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities to establish a legislative policy and lobby for a position to develop a funding mechanism for noise barriers on roadways that are already established and not a part of new construction; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this funding mechanism might consist of funding between private property owners, municipalities and the State of Minnesota and that the Association of Metropolitan consider recommending that the State funding source be from the motor vehicle excise tax. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the.Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 20, 1988, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 27th day of June, 1988. City Clerk RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Edina City Council has been undertaking studies on noise impacts along metropolitan freeways in Edina; and WHEREAS, a noise impact problem has been identified at Minnehaha Creek Bridge on T.H. 100; and WHEREAS, the noise created by the highway and bridge at Minnehaha Creek needs to be abated by repair of said area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby requests that the Minnesota Department of Transportation take appropriate action to repair T.H. 100 at Minnehaha Creek prior to September 1, 1988. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 20, 1988, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 27th day of June, 1988. City Clerk 1 ANA +Vrr\ o e U) • ,��RPOM��O • IBeB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: June 20, 1988 Subject: Z -88 -2 and S -88 -2, Pinewood Townhomes Recommendation: Agenda Item # IV. A. 1. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Accept withdrawal of townhouse proposal. Info /Background: The proponent has dropped the townhouse proposal in favor of a single family plat., 4 June 16, 1988 Mr.-Craig Larsen City 'of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Z -88 -2 Dear Mr. Larsen: You have requested that this previously submitted PRD -2 rezoning application be withdrawn prior to the City Council meeting next Monday June 20, 1988. Based on your request, you may consider the rezoning application to be withdrawn. Sincerely, Harvey Swenson U) ' ,'�roRPORPI�O ,BBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: June 20, 1988 Subject: . S -88 -5, Swenson's Replat of Lots 1, 2 & 3, Edenmoor Addition Recommendation: Preliminary Plat approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement 3. Subdivision Dedication Info /Background: Agenda Item #1V. B. 1 Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Efl To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion On May 16, 1988, the Council voted to direct staff to prepare findings to deny a 6 unit townhouse proposal on this property. Following that vote the proponent submitted a 4 lot single family plat proposal. The proposal was considered by the Planning Commission at its June 1', 1988 meeting. The initial proposal illustrated a cul de sac along the southerly portions of the property, adjacent to the rear yards of 4 lots fronting on Richwood Drive. The staff report addressed this proposal. However, after discussions with abutting property owners and Fran Hoffman,. the proponent submitted a revised preliminary plat illustrating a cul de sac along the northerly portions of the property, adjacent to the rear of the office building. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this revised preliminary plat. Lot sizes in the revised plat range from 10,120 square feet to 17,680 square feet, with an average size of 12,589 square feet. All of the lots meet or exceed Ordinance standards for single family lots. The preliminary plat proposes a 40 foot right of way, a 28 foot wide street and a hammer head cul de sac. This compares to our normal 50 foot right of way, 30 foot street and circular cul de sac. The reduction of right of way and street width allows for deeper lots and more desirable placement of homes. Fran Hoffman has reviewed and approved the proposed road design. The Planning Commission and staff prefer the revised preliminary plat. The resulting lots are more desirable and would create a more desirable relationship with the existing homes to the south. The lot sizes compare favorably to lot sizes in the Richmond Hills neighborhood. LOCATION : SUBDIVISION NUMBER Um i L O C A TI O N 5338 Sherwood Road and 5333 Vernon Avenue REQUEST Four Lot Subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON JUNE 1, 1988, AT 7:30 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman William Levis, Lee Johnson, John Bailey, Helen McClelland, Del Johnson, Gordon Johnson, John Palmer, David Runyan, Jane Paulus, Virginia Shav, and Geof Workinger STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Palmer moved for approval of the April 27, 1988 Community Development and Planning Commission Meeting Minutes. Commissioner D. Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS: Z -88 -1 Room and Board, Inc & 7100 France Avenue South P -88 -1 Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan 1980 to change Land Use Designation from Office to Commercial. Rezoning Request from POD -1, Planned Office District to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Amendment to Zoning Ordinance No. 825 to Permit Furniture Stores in Office Building District subject to Conditional Use Permit, or subject to Locational Restrictions Mr. Larsen informed the Commission that Room and Board,•Inc. withdrew their request for rezoning and an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 1980. III. NEW BUSINESS: 5 -88 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval for Swenson's Replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3, Edenmoor Addition Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall their recommendation for'approval of a proposal to redevelop the subject property with a 6 unit townhouse development at its April 27, 1988 meeting. At its May 16, 1988 meeting the City Council voted to have staff prepare findings to support denial of the townhouse proposal. Subsequent to the Council action the proponent has requested a suspension of action on the townhouse proposal, and has submitted a single family plat for review by the Commission. Mr. Larsen added the subject property comprises 3 lots of the Edenmoor Addition, platted in 1941. Two of the lots are developed with single family homes. The third is undeveloped due to its lack of frontage on a public street. A 30 foot by 110 foot section of public right of way exists in the southeasterly portion of the property. Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed plat contains 4 single family lots. The lots range in size from 10,136 square feet to 16,112 square feet in area with an average lot size of 12,693 square feet. All of the lots meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to review the revised plat which depicts a "hammer head" road instead of the road on the original 4 lot plan. Lots is the revised plat range in size from 10,120 square feet to 17,680 square feet with an average size of 12,584 square feet. The lots are all larger than required by the Zoning Ordinance. The lots are, also, generally consistent in size and shape with the lots of the Richmond Hills Staff would recommend preliminary plat approval-subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Developers Agreement Mr. Harvey Swenson, proponent was present. Mr. Swenson explained to the Commission the revised plat depicting the revision of the road is a result of working with neighbors and City staff. Mr. Swenson said the general consensus is that'the "hammer head turnaround" is the best approach for the neighborhood. Mr. Swenson pointed out the four property owners on Richwood Drive prefer this approach because there would be not road behind their homes. Commission members indicated they were satisfied with the previously submitted proposal for townhouses and felt the plan which was presented on April 27, 1988 was an ideal way to buffer residential neighbors from commercial areas. They noted the townhouse proposal was a change from the Land Use Designation in the City's Comprehensive Plan but pointed out the Grandview Area.is an area that has been earmarked for re- development and improvement which could include changes to the plan. Commissioner Paulus said the City must look at the needs of the community as a whole. She added Edina has a need for alternative housing. Many residents reach a point in their life's where they cannot care for a large home and it's upkeep of lawn care, snow removal, etc. A townhouse situation can be a perfect alternative. Commissioner Paulus stated she was very pleased with the previous townhouse proposal. The Commission indicated they were unclear regarding the direction of the Council in having staff present "Findings for Denial "on the townhouse proposal. Mr. Larsen said reasons the Council may have asked for "Findings for Denial" may have been a density issue and a change in the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Mr. Swenson when developing the townhouse proposal also had the 4 lot single family development as an alternate. Mr. Swenson indicated that he is pleased with the alternate plan. Commissioner McClelland asked if the proposed houses would have a curb,cut on Vernon Avenue. Mr. Larsen responded that 'there would not be a curb cut on Vernon Avenue. Commissioner L. Johnson said he feels the proposed lots are substandard when compared -with current subdivisions in the City. He added in his opinion the lots are not deep enough when all aspects of the proposal are considered. Commissioner L. Johnson pointed out that the proponent has suggested reduced front yard setbacks from the minimum requirements. A reduction in front yard setbacks is not acceptable. Mr. Swenson explained the reason for a reduction in the front yard setback requirement is to better accommodate the neighborhood: Commissioner Palmer said he views this current proposal with favor and does not see any difficulty with the "hammer head turnaround ". He added he is also uncomfortable with a reduction in front yard setbacks. He pointed out if this plat is approved he would not want to see legal ramifications regarding the reduced front yard setback. Commissioner McClelland proposed that the new street be posted to prevent parking on it by employees /clients of the Harvey Hansen building. Mr. Ron Cohen; President of the Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association, 5213 Richwood Drive, told the Commission he has not had an opportunity to view the current single family development proposal. He asked the Commission for time to meet with the residents of the neighborhood to review the new plans. Mr. Swenson told Mr. Cohen he is willing to meet with him and other residents of the area to review the proposed plant. Mr. Swenson gave Mr. Cohen a copy of the preliminary plat for his review. Commissioner Palmer moved to recommend preliminary plat approval for the revised plan subject to staff conditions and the recommendation that the proponent meets the front yard setback standards. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Upon roll call vote: Ayes: Bailey, McClelland, D. Johnson, G. Johnson, L. Lewis, J. Palmer, D. Runyan, V. Shaw and J. Paulus. Nays: L. Johnson, G. Workinger I / I 1 I � I 1 \ 117,69bJ2j ` 1 �r A is m I 1 PINE TRAIL ; - -r -- —� -- i 1 ----------- I L-_l LTJI �I I • LOT 7 I LOT 2 LOT 1 10,�12OZ i ' 10,636] -- I 11,9000 ' % I I I I I I SWENSON'S RE -PLAT OF LOTS 1.2.3 BLOCK 3 EDENMOOR ADDITION PREPARED BY: HOISINGTON GROUP INC. H o to eo eo SCALE '*A HARVEY G. SWENSON, MAI REAL ESTATE APPRAISER /CONSULTANT 6100 GREEN VALLEY DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55438 (612) 830 -9003 May 31, 1988 Mr. Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Application for Subdivision 5338 Sherwood Road 5333 Vernon Avenue Z -88 -2 and S -88 -2 Dear Mr. Larsen: Last Friday, May 27th, I reviewed the proposed subdivision with the City Engineer, Fran Hoffman for his comments. He indicated there would probably be concern over having the proposed street behind the houses on Richwood Drive. These abutting neighbors, as you know, all favored my proposed 6 unit townhouse development because the townhomes backed -up to their homes and the street was on the north end behind the Harvey Hansen Building. Mr. Hoffman asked if there was any way I could put the road on the north end. There isn't any feasible way with a cul-de -sac because of the configuration of the site and the amount of land a cul-de -sac eats up. There is, however, a way to put the road on the north end and use a "hammer- head" turnaround. I've sketched this out on the enclosed rough -draft site plan using a 35 foot right -of -way and a 25 foot roadway. The three easterly lots have a 25 foot setback from the new street in.order to provide Mai LM_j Page 2 Mr. Larsen greater spacing from the homes to the south along Richwood Drive. The most westerly lot along Vernon Avenue is setback further because of its greater depth, enabling the turn around area to function quite well at the west end. The home built on this westerly lot would also have a turnaround area in its driveway so that automobiles would not be backing out to the turnaround area in the street. Recognizing that there would be only four lots on this new street, and all of them single - loaded on the south side I would think that this could be a quite workable and attractive solution. Under this possible alternate plan, the new road would be separate the office use from the single family residential -and the four new single - family residences would back up to the existing homes on Richwood Drive. I know this would be preferable from my neighbors standpoint. Perhaps you could review this possible alternative with Mr. Hoffman prior to the Planning Comunission meeting tomorrow evening. If both of you think this could be a workable alternative. I would agree to revise my proposed subdivision accordingly. Sincerely, Harvey HGS /jkg cc: Mr. Fran Hoffman Mr. Fred Hoisington HENNEPIN May 31, 1988 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 320 Washington Av, South Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -8468 935 -3381 Mr. Craig Larsen, Planner City of Edina 4810 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: RE: Proposed Plat - Replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3 of Block 3, Edenmoor CSAH 158, Approximately.850 feet northeasterly of Hansen Road Section 28, Township 117, Range 21 Hennepin County Plat No. 1635 Review and Recommendations Minnesota Statutes 505.02 and 505.03, Plats and Surveys, require County review of proposed plats abutting County roads. We reviewed the above plat and make the following comments: - For future improvements to this heavily travelled segment of CSAH 158 the developer should dedicate an additional 10 feet of right of way making the right of way 50 feet from the center of CSAH 158. - All access to this plat must be via the proposed cul -de -sac extension of Edenmoor Street. No direct access from this replat will be permitted by Hennepin County. - The existing access from new Lot 4 to CSAH 158 must be removed and the boulevard restored to Hennepin County standards. - All proposed construction within County right of way requires an approved" utility permit prior to beginning construction. This includes, but is not limited to, drainage and utility construction, trail development, and landscaping. Contact our Maintenance Division for utility permit forms. - The developer must restore all areas disturbed during construction within County right of way. Please direct any response or questions to Les Weigelt. Sin a ely, Denni L. . Hansen, P.E. County Traffic Engineer cc: Harvey G. Swenson DLH /LDW:lw HENNEPIN COUNTY an equal opportunity employer . V'E31 HARVEY G. SWENSON, MAI RFAL ESTATE APPRAISER /CONSULTANT 61000RFEN VALLFY DRIVE MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55418 (612) 830 -91X11 June 3, 1988 Mr. Ronald/T,. Cohen 5213 Ric Drive Edina, ' esota 55436 RE: Application for Subdivision 5338 Sherwood Road 5333 Vernon Avenue S -88 -2 Dear Mr. Cohen: I writing as a follow -up to our brief discussion following the Planning Commission meeting Wednesday evening. As always, I'd be pleased to meet with you and other members of the Homeowners Association again to discuss my proposed subdivision as you requested Wednesday evening. I have already met with the four abutting neighbors to the south, on an individual basis, to discuss the two alternatives. The first proposal is the same as I had available at the previous neighborhood meeting where I explained my proposed townhome development plan for the sites. At that meeting, you chose to not have me review the proposed four -lot single - family subdivision inasmuch as I, at that time, was formally applying only for the townhome rezoning. , The second or "alternative" proposed subdivision with the road at the north end behind the Harvey Hansen Office Building is the subdivision the Planning Page 2 Mr. Cohen Commission voted to recommend for approval on Wednesday evening. The abutting neighbors much prefer this "alternate" proposal as well because there would be no road behind their homes, and the four new homes would have a more typical back -to -back arrangement. I know you left the Planning Commission meeting with several copies of the "alternate" proposal, but I don't know if, you saw the original. If you didn't, just let me know and I'll get you several copies of that as well. I look forward to meeting with you and other interested association members and neighbors to describe the proposals as well as obtain your input and preferences. Please let me know where and when you wish to meet. Sincerely, Harvey G., ,5�wenson Home phone 1924 -0213 Work phone 830 -9003 cc: Mr. Craig Larsen Mr. Fran Hoffman COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JUNE 1, 1988 5 -88 -5 Preliminary Plat Approval for Swenson's Replat of Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 3, Edenmoor Addition Generally Located: West of Sherwood Road and north of Edenmoor Street extended westerly. The Commission will recall recommending approval of a proposal to redevelop the subject property with a 6 unit townhouse development at its April 27, 1988 meeting. At its May 16, 1988 meeting the City Council voted to have staff prepare findings to support denial of the townhouse proposal. Subsequent to the Council action the proponent has requested a suspension of action on the z townhouse proposal, and has submitted a single family plat for review by the Commission. The subject property comprises 3 lots of the Edenmoor Addition, platted in 1941. Two of the lots are developed with single family homes. The third is undeveloped due to its lack of frontage on a public street. A 30 foot by 110 foot section of public right of way exists in the southeasterly portion of the property. This right of way would-be increased to 45 feet and improved to City standards by the proposed plat. The proposed plat contains 4 single family lots. The lots range in size from 10,136 square feet to 16,112 square feet in area with an average lot size of 12,693 square feet. All of the lots meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Recommendation The proposed single family development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the property's existing zoning. The lots are all larger than required by the Zoning Ordinance. The lots are, also, generally consistent in size and shape with the lots of the Richmond Hills neighborhood. The proposed plat illustrates a dedicated right of way of 45 feet, where we normally require 50 feet. However, the proposed 30 foot street and 35 foot radius cul de sac are consistent with our standards. The reduced right of way allows.a greater lot depth for lots 1 and 2. Staff believes the reduction is warranted in this instance. Staff would recommend preliminary plat approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Developers Agreement ^y0i Pjy~/ 1 yt\ \\ \ 1 i I 1 LOT J — I / '-.,.1 / \ \ LOT 2 a I L¢T 4/ 1 \ 2231 I I I i i I � � I :_,LOT 11 - -4- �_J � I i N , \\ / � \ I O Q O Ix O O O x N SWENSON'S RE -PLAT OF LOTS 1.23 BLOCK 3 EDENMOOR ADDITION PREPARED BY: HOISINGTON GROUP INC. I \ I II I e xo eo eo x•�e 14A. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Koietin, Director—Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: ,Tune 15, 1988 AGENDA ITEM vI.A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Braemar Pavilion Rennovation - Phase I Company Base_ Bid_ Alt. 1 Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Eagan Construction Co. $ 680,000 $ 11,200 1. 8 691,200 2. Shaw - Lundquist Assoc. 734,800 23.100 2. 757,900 3. Hagman Construction, Inc. 760400 91000 3. 769,000 4. Merrimac Construction Co. 768,840 11,150 4. 779,990 5. New Mech Companies 764,400 53,000 5. 817,400 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Eagan Construction Companv, Base Bid: $680,000 Dlus alternate demolitio $11,200. Total: $691,200. GENERAL INFORMATION: Rennovation of Braemar Arena with alternate one added for the removal of the old concrete floor in Braemar Pavilion. Eagan Construction Companv was low bidder and built the second arena for Burnsville in a period of six months. Their Darent company has built many arenas throughout the United States and are very familiar with ice arenas. I am very confident that thev are a complete the job before October 1, 1988a builder and their ability to Park and Recreation Sig ture Department The Recommended bid is Within budget not within budge Wallin, F' ance Director of Engineer's Estimates , a Kenneth Rosland, City Man l . ..i GENERAL INFORMATION (CONT.) The architect is proceeding on Phase II of the total Braemar Arena upgrading which will include Section A, locker rooms in the pavilion, and Section B, commons building between the two arenas. We will open bids on July 27 and will be before the Council at the August 1 Council meeting for your discussion.. The present bid of the refrigeration equipment in the arena includes, heating and dehumidification and insulation in the attic of the pavilion. It does not include any permanent walls on the pavilion, bleachers, or locker rooms of any type. The bid that is before you is in budget which was estimated between $700,000 and $800,000 originally. It is hoped that Phase II, Sections A and B, will also be in our overall budget that was proposed on the staff report. ok e 'T, � r- EST FOR PURCHASC O REQUEST n�Dnr'nu,,.J TO: Mavor and City council FROM. Bob Koietin, Director Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5 000 DATE: June 15, 1988 A(,.PNjnA ITPRA ITT n _ �. �. .�. . . . X1.1 • L ITEM DESCRIPTION: Tree Trimming in the SW duadrant of the citv COnlpanV Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Davev Tree 1 $ 2 • Arps Tree 2 • 2.90 /in. 3 2.94/in. Asplundh 3• 4• 3.45/in. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Davey Tree $ 2.90 /in. GENERAL INFORMATION: Trimming of trees in the southwest quadrant of the city to be assessed to homeowners. Approximately 16,000 trees with an approximate cost of $40,000, which is determined by the total inches of the tree. Park and Recreation Sign �re Department The Recommended bid is within budget not whinidget o�n,�Wallin, F'` ance Director Kenneth Rosland, City Man / 2• REQUEST FOR P URCHASc TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Koetin, Director, Park and Recreation Department VIA: Kenneth Rosland City Manager SUBJECT. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: June 15, 1988 � Ar.FNne ITPnA ITEM DESCRIPTION: Removal of Dutch Elm Diseased trees _Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1• Asplundh $ 8.50 /in. 2. Arps Tree 1• 2. 10.45 /in. 3 Tim's Tree Service 3• 12.00 /in. 4. 4 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Asplundh GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 8.50 /in. Approximately $40,000 worth of Dutch Elm Diseased trees that have to be removed from the boulevards. Cost is determined by the inches of the tree. total • The Recommended bid is Park and Recreation within budget not within bud et oh allin, Finan: a Director Kenneth Rosland. City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASC TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Bob Koietin, Director. Park and Recreation Department VIA. Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $%000 DATE: June 15, 1988 AGENDA ITEM vi.n ITEM DESCRIPTION: Company 1. Arps 2. Asplundh 3. 4. 5. Tree Stump Removal Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 1.30 /in. 2. 1.65 /in. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Arps $ 1.30 /in. GENERAL INFORMATION: Removal of approximately 815,000 worth of stumps from the removal of Dutch Elm Diseased trees on boulevards. Cost-is determined by the total inches of the tree. Sign re The Recommended bid is -r _ within budget not Kenneth Park and Recreation Department City allin, Finance Director AI-V e C_ Y, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: JUNE 17, 1988 Subject: SALE OF USED LEVER VOTING MACHINES Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI.E Consent ❑ Information Only F-] Mgr. Recommends [l To HRA EKI To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Award of bid for purchase of City's used lever voting machines to sole bidder, Kleins's Scrap Iron & Metal Company, at $3.61 per machine, FOB Barrett Moving and Storage Company, 7100 Washington Avenue So. Info /Background: Bids for purchase of the. City's 112 used lever voting machines were solicited from the two companies who still handle used AVM machines; Pierce County, Washington State (had advertised to purchase used machines) 3 counties in Kansas and 23 northern counties in Iowa who still use AVMs; and 8 local scrap metal dealers. Only three cities in Minnesota still use the AVM machine. They are not interested in purchasing additional machines as they anticipate purchasing new voting systems in the near future. The sole.bidder, Kleins's Scrap Iron & Metal Company, purchased the used lever voting machines from the City of Richfield last year at $2.00 per machine. Mr. Klein said that he compacted the machines but received very little as scrap because they contain a mixture of metals and it is not cost effective to separate the metals out. During 1987 the City of Minneapolis disposed of 999 lever machines and netted approximately $.50 per machine. The City of St. Paul disposed of 506 machines last year by turning them over to the owner of the warehouse in which they were stored in exchange for back rent (netted $7.35 per machine). The owner planned to scrap them. I sent a bid form to that individual but received no bid. I would recommend the City accept the bid from Kleins's Scrap Iron & Metal Company. e Bids opened 11:00 a.m. Thursday, June 16, 1988 CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 BID FOR PURCHASE OF USED VOTING EQUIPMENT The undersigned hereby submits the following bid for purchase of lever Automatic Voting Machines: State number of machines desired: Bid: (p ( per machine. List serial numbers of desired machines: All equipment FOB Barrett Moving & Storage Co., 7100 Washington Avenue So., Eden Prairie, Minnesnta_ Company By ycnv Title Address C yty State Zip Phone Dated �o :;71 c' ti �1 o e A H � �o ;,A •'NR�RPO%?NN W a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KENNETH ROSLAND Mgr. Recommends ❑ CITY MANAGER From: To Council Action CEIL SMITH ❑ ASSISTANT TO THE ❑ CITY MANAGER Date: 6/20/88 Subject: INSURANCE RENEWALS (PROPERTY) Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI. F Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Award Property Insurance to The Hartford - Premium $41,782.00 Info /Background: Attached is the premium quotations we received for our Property Insurance renewals. Based on.consideration as to payment of the premium (25% down and the remaining amount amortized over a nine -month period), and because The Hartford performed excellently by covering losses this year totalling over $9,000.00 quickly and efficiently in areas in which coverage was in question. Staff makes the aforementioned recommendation. W PREMIUM COMPARISON PROPERTY INSURANCE RENEWAL 7/1/88 Hartford Expiring $ 56.991 (x'87 Property Values of $30.663.184) Hartford Expiring $ 74._243 ('88 Property Values of $40.131.713) Hartford Renewal $ 41.7.82 Royal $ 42.833 Home $ 40.781 League of Municipalities $ 52.891 Zurich $ 54.000 Estimated Continental No Quote Too much Competition Northbrook No Quote Chubb No Quote Too much Competition Fd ch .�0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION ,aaa To: KENNETH ROSLAND Agenda Item # VI. F From: CITY MANAGER CEIL SMITH Consent ❑ ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: 6/20/88 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: ❑ To Council INSURANCE RENEWALS Action E� Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommendation is award Option #3 with a premium cost of $479,956.00 plus newly required surcharges totaling $8,493.00. Info /Background: Attachment A contains the four quotations that we have received for our insurance renewals for 1988/89 of the City's General Liability, Auto Liability, Worker's Compensation and Liquor Liability coverages. As you can see, we received quotes from Transcontinental, Penco, The Hartford, Home Insurance and The League. B illustrates premium costs based on actual losses under the various options. Option 3 (Home Insurance) results in the lowest cost to the City four out of the five year periods. CITY OF EDINA 4 Insurance Quotations Options June 1988 OPTION #1 Attachment PREMIUMS TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit $ 53,600 PENCO - General Liability $ 500,000 Limit 124,719 Automobile $ 500,0.00 Limit 54,104 (No Comp, or Collision) LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Between 103,452 and 398,687 Premium = 103,452 + ( Losses x 1.10) Premium does not vary with losses; except Workers Compensation OPTION #2 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit $ 53,600 HARTFORD - General Liability - $ 500,000 Limit (5,000 deductible property damage) 81,208 Automobile $ 500,000 Limit 54 ,;104 (No Comp, or Collision) LEAGUE- Workers Compensation Between $103,452 and 398,687 Insured pays all Property Damage claims under $5,000 CITY Or EDINA OPTION #3 HOME INSURANCE - General Liability, including Liquor - $ 500,000 Automobile $ 500,000 HOME INSURANCE - Workers Compensation Present Plan - Premium varies with losses on all lines. OPTION #4 TRANSCONTINENTAL - Liquor - $ 500,000 Limit LEAGUE - General Liability $ 600,000 Limit Automobile $.600,000 Limit LEAGUE - Workers Compensation Attachment A - __ge 2 PREMIUMS $ 86,991 3 4, 0 26 (Includes $3,137 Charge for. Comp. and Collision - Fire Trucks) 358,939 $ 53,600 106,238* 19,925 (No Comp, and C QUision ) Between $103,452 and 398,687 * Claims made coverage - $36,750 to purchase extended reporting endorsement. 83/84 84/85 85/86 86/87 87/88 LOSSES AS OF 6/9/88 Auto /GL * Work Comp 41,633 136,982 55,362 36,123 41,424 341,398 39,117 256,328 97,660 ** 123,667 MINIMUM PREMIUM MAXIMUM PREMIUM PREMIUM -BASED ON ACTUAL LOSSES - OPTION 1 } }} OPTION 2 454,751 450,044 375,610 337,460 631,110 - 591,055 617,836 582,483 471,909 471,058 335,875 292,364 Attachment B OPTION'3 OP 364,421 258,140 613,513 506,93 1 416,521 T!ION 4 470,653 359,708 615,208 601,934 456,007 146,547 283,215 631,110 587,599 631,305 578,450 d ma eis , (under O 1988/89 PREMIUM 528 001 484,490 479,956 512,099 There is an additional surcharge this year to go to the State's Guarantee Fund of 2% of Worker's Compensation premium, 1.2% of General Liability Premium and .8% of the Auto Liability premium. * Losses include Auto and General Liability ** 94,000 of this total is related to storm of 7/23/87 Subsequently the City has received a retro- adjustment check of $193,445.00. III Options correspond to option outlined in Attachment A MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE JUNE 14p 1988 9 :00 A.M. VII. A MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Lois Coon Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT: Alison Fuhr OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Jim Grube, City of St. Louis Park Mr. Deane Wenger, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. Verle Poffenberger, Byerly's Mr. Charles Rickart, Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Mr. Howard Merriman, The Lanterns Assn., 4075 West 51st Street Mr. M. C. Blumers, The Lanterns Assn., 4075 West 51st Street Ms. Ruth Newcombe, The Lanterns Assn., 4075 West 51st Street Mrs. Chesley Carlson, 5225 Minnehaha Boulevard Mr. Seth N. Witts, 5113 Indianola Avenue Mr. Peter Foley, 6217,Loch Moor Drive Mr. James Hamann, Edina Public Schools, Director Business Services Mr. Randolph Hippe, 4213 West 62nd Street Mr. George Buchok, 5312 Halifax Avenue Ms. Lori Smiley,15308 Halifax Avenue Ms. Sharon Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue Ms. Teresa Forliti, 5336 Halifax Avenue Mr. Randolph Hosler, 5133 Halifax Avenue Ms. Linda Farrell, 5700 South Blake Road Mr. John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue Ms. Suzyn Ware, 4081 Sunnyside Road Mr. David Shank, 4081 Sunnyside Road Ms. Anne Bishop, 5324 Halifax Avenue Ms. Barb Olson, 5124 Indianola Avenue Ms. Jane Squires, 4075 West 51st Street, #401 Mr. Jerry Squires, 4075 West 51st Street, #401 Officer Brandon Deshler, Edina Police Department TEU Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization or recommended action. (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Loch Moor Drive. Request received from Mr. Peter Foley, 6217 Loch Moor Drive. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 14, 1988 Page 2 (Continued) ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Peter Foley was present at the meeting and expressed the concern that many vehicles were using Loch Moor Drive as a shortcut between Gleason Road and Valley View.Road, thereby increasing the amount of traffic and also the speed,at which they proceeded through this area. He also noted that the influx seemed to be more so between the hours of 5:00 and 8:00 PM. Mr. Swanson asked Mr. Foley if he had noticed any change in the traffic pattern since school was no longer in session, to which Mr. Foley replied that he really had not noticed a significant difference. Mr. Swanson presented the accident history since 1983 stating that there had been three (3) accidents since mid -1983• Mr. Swanson moved that the area be assigned scheduling by the Traffic Enforcement Unit to create a Police deterrent and also to more accurately assess the speed problem. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-o. (2) Discuss traffic safety concerns in the Morningside area impacted by a traffic task force study in St. Louis Park. Requested by the Edina Traffic Safety Committee. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Jim Grube of City of St. Louis Park attended the meeting to further advise the members of what was included in the study, to review traffic counts, and to apprise the City of Edina as to how St. Louis Park plans to proceed. On June 6, 1988, the St. Louis Park City Council met to review the final alternatives reached by the task force. In review, West 38th Street is of major concern as the volume is between 4800 and 5500 vehicles per day who use this street as a shortcut from France Avenue to Excelsior or vice versa. A traffic impact study was performed by St. Louis Park, at which time the City Council authorized a task force to be made up of neighbors, business persons, and City representatives for the months of February through May to evaluate this area and to devise solutions to increasing traffic problems.. The methods that the task force evaluated were three- fold, namely, signing, barriers and barricades, and finally street closures. The task force has, at the June 6th meeting, made their recommendations to St..Louis Park City Council to proceed with a summerlong experiment utilizing the three methods mentioned and to change traffic patterns by way of restrictions or obstructions. They will look at approximately 50 locations in the course of a month and also do traffic counts to substantiate their findings. They admit that they do not have the "best" TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 14, 1988 Page 3 (Continued) solution as of yet. Their study will begin on June 27th, at which time the Edina Engineering Department will also begin to evaluate traffic counts to ascertain what impact the study will have on Edina. Mr. Grube also stated that at present they have eliminated any propsed restrictions in the 40th Street area so as not to involve Edina in any repercussions. He also added that the study will.be terminated before the next school term begins and will send a letter to the City this week with exact scheduling of each alternative, etc. so that we might imple- ment our studies. Mr. Hoffman moved that we schedule traffic counts in the next week for Edina's affected areas, and that we do additional traffic counts as each alternative is implemented. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried -0. (3) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 62nd Street at Peacedale Avenue. Referred to the Edina Traffic Safety Committee by the Edina City Council. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by stating that in terms of traffic counts the totals had not varied noticeably since 1972, those counts being in the neighbor- hood of 2500 vehicles per day. Officer Deshler reported that unmarked squads using radar had been recently stationed heavily in the area with reports showing a large number of vehicles in excess of 30 mph, some in excess of 50 mph and over, and the greatest number of violations occurring during the morning rush hour, or the 7:OO AM to 9:00 AM period. Mr. David Shank expressed his viewpoint that if sidewalks were installed to extend to-Valley View Road, they would be most advantageous on the north side of West 62nd Street, as the park is located on that side of the street and he felt there are safety concerns when crossing West 62nd Street at Valley View Road. Another resident suggested the possibility of installing a "STOP" sign at Peacedale Avenue and West 62nd Street. Officer Deshler commented that at present it does not appear that the Traffic Enforcement Unit has been effective in reducing speeds in the area. When asked by Mr. Hoffman how this area differs from, say, Valley View or Wooddale Avenue, Officer Deshler said that there was really very little difference. Mr. Swanson's overall view was that the speed, in fact, was a safety concern as expressed at the last City Council meeting, and that either larger signs and /or increased traffic enforcement were probably warranted. He also stated that he would question whether the warrants were met for TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 14 1988 Page 4 (Continued) placement of "STOP" signs, and if such placement took place, would they in fact reduce speeds. Mr. Hughes moved that the Committee report back to the Edina City Council that the street does, in fact, exhibit unsafe conditions with the addition that the matter has been referred to the Police Department's Traffic Enforcement Unit, and also that the speed limit signs in the area be enlarged. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 4-0. (4) Request for signalization on Hazelton Road at west Byerly's entrance. Continued from April 1988 meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman began by giving a synopsis of the report presented by Barton - Aschman Associates, Inc. In essence, the report states that the warrants are met for signalization based on traffic counts conducted on Hazelton Road and at Byerly's entrances /exits. Barton - Aschman representatives stated that they felt signalization was the best approach to the problem. They also stated that the capacity analysis indicated a maximum back -up on Hazelton Road of 114' and that the total distance between France Avenue and Byerly's driveway was 2801. Mr. Hoffman questioned whether the queue would be such that it would keep the back -up out of the intersection. Both Barton - Aschman Associates and representatives of Hennepin County agreed that it would and also stated that it could be wired for interconnect to the existing signal on France and Hazelton. Mr. Swanson moved that the proposal be submitted to the Edina City Council for review with a recommendation for a public hearing to be scheduled on August 15� 1988. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING June 14, 1988 Page 5 (Continued) (1) Discuss installation of barricade at West 51st Street and Halifax Avenue. Request received from members of The Lanterns Association, 4075 West 51st Street. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman reviewed what had transpired in past meetings regarding the safety concerns of the Halifax residents and also the options evaluated for reducing these concerns and problems. He also presented an update on the traffic counts for this area, with the only noticeable change being on Halifax Avenue between West 51st Street and West 54th Street. Ms. Ruth Newcombe, representing The Lanterns Association, expressed the residents' opinion that, (a) children, though precious to each of us, can be taught to stay out of the street as a play area, especially with the Arden Avenue playground located so close to the vicinity, and (b) a large number of vehicles were now using The Lantern's driveway as the new 115.1st Street ". She also stated that the residents were concerned regarding not being able to use the driveway on the facility's west side. Mr. Hoffman reiterated that when traffic surveys were initially done, it was learned that 42% of the traffic using Halifax Avenue was, in fact, thru traffic. Another area resident asked if the barrier might be placed 3 houses south of its present location to allow access of West 51st Street to Indianola Avenue. Mr. Hoffman said that, if changed, the diverter would probably be placed at West 52nd Street. Mr. Seth Witts, a long -time resident of Indianola, stated that he felt at a greater risk trying to negotiate turns on West 50th Street or France Avenue at intersections that were uncontrolled. He added that closing off Halifax has forced him to, in fact, bypass the controlled intersec- tions that he would like to use. Mrs. Chesley Carlson of Minnehaha Boulevard felt that Halifax residents should have been aware of traffic volumes, as she had been aware when moving to the neighborhood, and that closing Halifax Avenue was unfair to the neighborhood. Mr. John Crist asked the Committee's input on rectifying The Lantern's problems without changing the present barrier and signing. Mr. Hoffman answered that the Engineering Department would count the traffic using the parking lot as a drive -thru and also conduct a license plate survey of same. Mr. Randy Hosler and Mr. George Buchok stated that the decrease in Halifax traffic has been considerably noticeable, and Ms. Maetzold said that, although an inconvenience, it has reduced speed problems. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING June 14, 1988 Page 6 (Continued) Mr. Crist also stated that now more of the Halifax Avenue drivers are local residents who will not drive carelessly or recklessly and pay more attention to children, etc. There were 12 enforcement contacts, per Mr. Swanson, approximately 10 days after the barrier was placed. Of those 12, three (3) were from outside of Edina, and nine (9) were from the northeast quadrant, three (3) of those remaining nine (9) being from the neighborhood area. He also stated he felt it was too early to judge the total impact of the changes. Mr. Swanson moved to continue the matter for one month pending traffic count surveying of adjacent streets and in The Lanterns parking lot area. And, to place "NO THRU TRAFFIC" signs at the entrances to The Lanterns drive- way /parking area. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. (2) Request for installation of a stop sign on Interlachen Boulevard at Bywood West. Requested by the Edina Schools Transportation Safety Committee. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. James Hamann began by explaining the standard policy for school bus stops. In essense, the policy asks that a child not walk farther than three (3) blocks, and that they not cross a city street if at all possible. He then outlined what the Transportation Safety Committee had suggested as possible options for the pick -up at 5801 Interlachen Boulevard. This pick -up subsegUently resulted in a 5- year -old child being struck by a vehicle while crossing Interlachen Boulevard to get to his assigned bus stop. The child, who previously had been escorted across Interlachen by a parent, was attempting to cross on his own while the parent observed, when he was struck. Mr. Hamann was asked if it was possible for the child to arrange for a pick -up on Mirror Lakes. He commented that it was not acceptable as the parent's view was obstructed at the corner of Interlachen and Mirror Lakes by large trees. Mr. Hamann further stated that at present they were evaluating the bus stopping in front of 5801 Interlachen Boulevard. If this were the case, they would want to use flashers and also the stop order arm for both directions of traffic. Mr. Hamann expressed concern that the use of flashers and the stop order arm would create the potential for accidents with the school bus. Rear end accidents might occur or accidents relating to violations of the stop order arm. The stop order arm is not currently in use as a matter of policy by the School District. Mr. Hoffman inquired as to what was the criteria for bus stops on certain ® other streets in Edina. Mr. Hamann said that the Transportation Board TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 14, 1988 Page 7 (Continued) could provide that criteria for review. Mr. Swanson asked if the Board had discussed placement of a stop sign at Mirror Lakes Drive as opposed to placing one at Bywood West. Mr. Hamann replied that the child would still be required to walk in the traffic lane for a portion of Interlachen Boulevard to get to Mirror Lakes, as there is a retaining wall which extends all the way to the roadway at 5733 Interlachen Boulevard. To futher complicate the issues, Mr. Hamann said that there is neither room for a bus to pull into the driveway or over to the side of the road on Interlachen. Mr. Hoffman again inquired as to how those, for example, on the north side of Interlachen were walking to the designated bus stop areas. He was told that most all other stops are made at locations north of Inter- lachen Boulevard, or in other words children were walking in a direction away from Interlachen. Mr. Hughes questioned how a stop sign on Inter- lachen would really help the situation. Mr. Hamann replied that if the traffic were stopped or preparing to stop, the stop order arm would not have to be utilized, thereby allowing westbound traffic to proceed past the bus. Ms. Linda Farrell, a Transportation Board member, stated that she had three letters representing the great concern from parents regarding this issue. She also said that the concensus was that the parents would rely on the Traffic Safety Committee and Hennepin County to arrive at the best possible solutions to the problems. Mr. Hoffman inquired as to the use of "BUS STOP AHEAD" signing in a metro- politan area. Although these signs are normally used at blind stops in rural areas, he was told that this was feasible. Mr. Deane Wenger, an attendee at the Committee meeting on an unrelated matter, also commented that he had written a thesis regarding stop sign usage which revealed the normal experience in Hennepin County was that 4 -way stop signs invariably increased rear end accidents, increased pedes- trian related accidents, and also did reduce speed. Mr. Swanson asked if the City or Hennepin County would be responsible for placement of 'BUS STOP AHEAD" signs and was told that Interlachen Boule- vard is a county road and, therefore, Hennepin County would take the responsibility. Mr. Hoffman moved to send the Transportation Safety Committee options to Hennepin County for review along with the three 3) PTA support letters submitted by Ms. Linda Farrell. Mr. Swanson seconded the motion. Motion carried 44 -0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES June 14, 1988 Page 8 (Continued) (3) Request to upgrade the intersection of Schaefer Road and Interlachen' Boulevard from a 2 -way "STOP" to a 3 -way "STOP ". Request received from Dr. Stanley Fruchtman, 6405 Interlachen Boulevard. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Swanson opened this agenda item by presenting the accident history of this intersection. In 1985 there was one (1) property damage accident and in 1986 there was one (1) property damage accident at 6400 Inter - lachen Boulevard. This second accident is believed to have taken place in the parking lot of Interlachen Country Club. Mr. Hoffman stated that more conflicts at this location may someday warrant upgrading to a 3 -way "STOP ", but at present such warrants as traffic counts would probably not be met. Mrs. Coon moved to postpone this item for further study of "STOP" sign warrants. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion carried 40. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE [SI J-1 l� i J �011�� i I C CA i ST. 'n F-1!7, 1 I Z O Q �.i C I 1 t O w O I= I O I - x 3 NO RIGHT ON RED Wprer To.sr S P �LILAC �•'M *GE O _. BASS LAKE NO RIGHT TURN 7 -9 A.M. 0 -6 P.M. CENTER >_1 SIG. MOD. J FAVOR WOLFE� PARK WOLFE a LAKE a W.� -BIK ST .. ft ;In fi TRUMPET 1 ISLAND N 9 /•� T TE W. 4 2 nd S I i N I O j I n I rn L� S. p a - .. r_ W W a fl r i S T a Q S = a L— � OT1 CT it c �VµrY oJ4 • 421/2 c W gY6Z j 3 la 1- I o a W iH jW t /t W O Y u r o o° u TRAFFIC CIRCLE 11r ui N N N W 0 �1 e_ TZl N y q v � Islands 2 i j z a W >t T. STAR t 3 l DIVERT! W iH jW t /t W O Y u r o o° u TRAFFIC CIRCLE 11r W. 42 r4 ST ui N N N W 0 CITY OF N i q O ag I 2 i j z a W >t T. 1~11 s t 3 l Wz DO NOT ENTER yI 7.9 A.M. 4 -6 P.M. fY U Q I r~iI W. 42 r4 ST MORNINGSIDE ROAD W i yE = W '� aANSDN er. o 5(. O W. ♦S SL I yg0 -- � I. gJM1t• Alt. A ui N N N W 0 CITY OF N i q o W SLa a EDJNA W W > > a i ' a > a l Wz a N z W ~ H fY U Q z r Y u W a u t u V MORNINGSIDE ROAD W i yE = W '� aANSDN er. o 5(. O W. ♦S SL I yg0 -- � I. gJM1t• Alt. A 'J'' 5 a m m 3 I 3 N a� W I a 0 C I W I 3 i m z .m W ; x `II I i li i - a�H�st�aN N ;el Lorvv °a W 0 WOLFE# PARK\ I� 9 n. , c u L� 3 z a L LQ W ; \s u = F- d o v J 8 W _ 7 t�bc II 1 ' II ST w vi a '1 (Star Dive t or — �� 7T. N CITY OF ED1NA 1 t" Alt. B I r H i I W W, I u Q 4 w a FriN m Z W x . r i a[ss , i j r .y VE. !C '1 �t `F POSK OFFICE I( I---- J 8 W z .7 I OEM I on Red .r -- Tower 0 5 / V1. 0 I _p O O W LIL 4C I�ME G�L �I ,9L N > /N N W = Z V 3 I I N E * /M��E C, t^ W ` W W W o z E > a h t Lmi v M \P ►c` W 40 I" o a a a a ST. z Dlverter f. t t- z n I p4 > 1 L 9 ��C \ZJj,�.•\ �DOp�n, S'_a IIT_- z /` i N I \y I I N I N; �7'P T Tsfa' I / W C I 11 N �L Ej J W > I I w j NII4a 7t Q 9�, •Y 0 I F $T. .� � � W.42 2 ST. T D�� S. W I N �~ p E Q J N y l N i Tlc� I yj 10I _w wl4z !sT < �s - a o CITY OF W W m 0 II 1 - a d o CT o S�< > ED1NA ; X l ;> I �I I a a > a ST. > Inul I 0 �VwEy gk. X42 t/2 p a W I'I u I W 3 N ; la z W W W z l0- � y7�� � � z tYj � 7 ° u I 9 0 I! I v W O J . Q 4 N Y =II > u o >III N 1 N N -- ` M_ORNINGSIDE ROAD N O a oz c W > J 431 $ -A BaAN5014 ST. i a a > i a / W n o , — W 43 c BROWNDALE yD I W u I D $ N ' W. 45 ST /gCE Alt. C _ STATEMENT TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL By: William S. Phillips Date: June 20, 1988 The Lanterns 4075 West 51 Street Edina, MN 55424 We at the Lanterns understand and are sympathetic to the residents of Halifax Avenue South. But we are disappointed with the lack of notice of the test. All of us only learned after the fact. We are surprised that no attempt was made to understand about access to our garage. There is a problem for those of us who use the west entrance. When going east on 51 Street, the turn into our outdoor lot is almost a hairpin right, which must be made quickly because of following traffic. This turn is dangerous and inconvenient, and will become an unexpected surprise to visitors who are not familiar with the area. We also expect other motorists to use our parking lot as an illegal turn into Halifax. We wish that the police could give tickets to persons who do so. We don't know what the solution to Halifax's traffic problem should be, but all we'ask is that consideration be given to Lanterns residents who desire to use the west garage entrance, and to visitors for whom the hard, fast right turn is difficult. f REPORT /RECOMMEND' ATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From. MARCE-bLA DAEHN, CLERK Date. JUNE 17�, 1988 Subject: WINE LA'UhNSE RENEWALS Agenda Item # VTT.B Consent ❑ Information Only [] Mgr . Recommends [] To HRA 0 To Council Action [] Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Approval of wine license renewals for Boundary Waters Restaurant, Empress Restaurant, Good Earth, Original Pancake House /My Pie, Ediner, Pantry Restaurant and Szechuan Star, as recommended by the Police Department. Info /Background: Attached are copies of the reports and recommendations for the above wine license renewals from the Police Department. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended for the following restaurants: Boundary Waters Restaurant, Good Earth, Original Pancake House /My Pie, Ediner and Pantry Restaurant. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - Boundary Waters Restaurant The Boundary Waters Restaurant was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of the Boundary Waters Restaurant revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at the Boundary Waters Restaurant indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on -site inspection of,the Boundary Waters Restaurant was conducted on June 15, 1988. It was noted during.the inspection that there was not a licensed manager on duty. The manager on duty had applied for a 1988 license. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings and what was required for compliance. An unannounced re- inspection will occur within 30 days to assure compliance. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended. A manager's license is simple to obtain and can be processed quickly. Conditions should include immediate application for manager's license and a weekly random check for the presence of a licensed manager on the premises. If non- compliance is noted, the issue should be returned to the City Council for appropriate action. If you have any questions, please contact me. r - CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - Boundary Waters Restaurant The application for renewal was submitted by corporate president John Lovelace and it showed no corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to the Boundary Waters Restaurant relating to liquor or license violations. Three applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 15, 1988 which revealed that a licensed manager was not on duty. The manager on duty has applied for a 1988 license. SGT. OG OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION l @-i1 ry M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal.- The Empress Restaurant The Empress Restaurant was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license, location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of The Empress Restaurant revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at The Empress Restaurant indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on-site-inspection of The Empress Restaurant was conducted on June 11, 1988. No discrepancies were noted with regard to applicable statutes and ordinances. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings. Based on the above findings, license renewal is recommended for The Empress Restaurant. If you have any questions, please contact me. CRAI G. SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah 3 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - The Empress Restaurant 3335 Hazelton Rd. The application for renewal was submitted by corporate president Soon Ying Lau and it showed no corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been.found clear." There have been no calls for service to the Empress Restaurant relating to liquor or license violations. Two applications have been received for manager licenses and both have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 11, 1988 which revealed that all provisions of the ordinance have been complied with. SGT.-`R ER °OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah 13 • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - The Good Earth The -Good Earth was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location; and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of The Good Earth revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of. the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at The Good Earth indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on -site inspection of The Good Earth was conducted on June 14, 1988. It was noted during the inspection that the wine license was not properly posted. -At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings and what was required for compliance. An unannounced re- inspection will occur within 30 days to assure compliance. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended. If you have any questions, please contact me. CRAIG . SWANSON CHIE OF POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - The Good Earth The application for renewal was submitted by corporate president Don Hays and it showed no. corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to The Good Earth relating to liquor or license violations. . Four applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 14, 1988 which revealed that the wine license was not properly posted. SGT. ROGER OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - Original Pancake House /My Pie The Original Pancake House /My Pie was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers, of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of Original Pancake House /My Pie revealed no.criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at Original Pancake House /My Pie indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced' on -site inspection of Original Pancake House /My Pie was conducted on June 15, 1988. It was noted during the inspection that the wine license was not properly posted. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings and what was required for compliance. An unannounced re- inspection will occur within 30 days to assure compliance. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended. If you have any questions, please contact me. CRAIG SWANSON CHIEF F POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - Original Pancake House /My Pie 3501 W. 70th St. The application for renewal was submitted by co -owner David Webb and it showed no ownership changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to Original Pancake House /My Pie relating to liquor or license violations. Five applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are 'on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 15, 1988 which revealed. that the wine license was not properly posted, however, the manager assured that it would be corrected. 93T-,-'ROGER OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G: Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - The Ediner The Ediner was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an.updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of The Ediner revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints' at The Ediner indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on -site inspection of The Ediner was conducted on June 13, 1988. It was noted during the inspection that the wine license was not posted, however, was to be posted immediately, and there was not a licensed manager on duty. The manager on duty had applied for a license in 1988. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings and what was required for compliance. An unannounced .'re- inspection will occur within 30 days to assure compliance. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended. A manager's license is simple to obtain and can be processed quickly. Conditions should include immediate application for manager's license and a weekly random check for the presence of a licensed,manager on the premises. If non - compliance is noted, the issue should be returned to the City Council for appropriate action. If you have any questions, please contact me. r CRAIG G SWANSON CHIEF AF POLICE CGS:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - The Ediner 3669 W. 69th St. The application for renewal was submitted by corporate president Neal Wickert and it showed no corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to The Ediner relating to liquor or license violations. Three applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 13, 1988 which revealed that the wine license was not posted, however, was to be posted immediately, and there was not a_ licensed manager on duty. The manager on duty had applied for a license in 1988.. /ter 1 SGT. ROGERKOLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - Pantry Restaurant The Pantry Restaurant was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers,of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of The Pantry. Restaurant revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at The Pantry Restaurant indicated no such responses that were pertinent' to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on -site inspection of The Pantry Restaurant was conducted on June 10, 1988. It was noted during the inspection that the wine license was not properly posted and there was not a licensed manager on duty at the time of inspection. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings and what.was required for compliance. An unannounced re- inspection will occur within 30 days to assure compliance. A conditional approval for license renewal is recommended.- A manager's license is simple to obtain and can be processed quickly. Conditions should include immediate application for manager's license and a weekly random check for the presence of a licensed manager on the premises. If non - compliance is noted, the issue should be returned to the City Council for appropriate action. If you have any questions, please contact me. CRAIG GY SWANSON CHIEF OF POLICE CGS:nah 0 0 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - Pantry Restaurant The application for renewal was submitted by corporate president Kenneth Johnson and it showed no corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to The Pantry relating to liquor or license violations. Three applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 10, 1988 which revealed that the wine license was not properly posted and there was not a licensed manager on duty at the time of inspection. SCR: R09ER OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah M E M O R A N D U M TO: Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police SUBJECT: Wine License Renewal - Szechuan Star Szechuan Star was rexamined for the purpose of wine license renewal for the license period starting July 1, 1988. This examination included an updated criminal check on the owner(s) and managers of the license, a review of calls and complaints responded to by the police at the license location, and an inspection of the license location to monitor compliance with ordinances and statutes. Criminal checks on the principals responsible for management of Szechuan Star revealed no criminal convictions that affect the management of the license. A complete review of police response to calls for service or complaints at Szechuan Star indicated no such responses that were pertinent to mismanagement of the license or suspected law violations. An unannounced on -site inspection of Szechuan Star was conducted on June 14, 1988. No discrepancies were noted with regard to applicable statutes and ordinances. At the conclusion of the inspection the manager was explained the findings. Based on the above findings, license renewal is recommended for Szechuan Star. If you have any questions, please contact me. r CRAIG FFPOLICE WANSON CHIEF CGS:nah 1 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Craig G. Swanson, Chief of Police DATE: June 17, 1988 FROM: Sgt. Roger Olwin SUBJECT: Renewal of Wine License - Szechuan Star Restaurant The application for renewal was submitted by corporate executive officer Kuen Kuen Woo Huie and it showed no corporate management changes from last year. The corporate officers have been investigated for criminal violations and have all been found clear. There have been no calls for service to the Szechuan Star relating to liquor or license violations. Four applications have been received for manager licenses and all have a clear criminal history. All related documents are on file in the Investigative Division. An on -site inspection was conducted on June 14, 1988 which revealed that all ordinances were being complied with. "SGT: ROGER OLWIN INVESTIGATIVE DIVISION RO:nah A. o e ch • N�bRpopul I O aae REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Susan Wohlrabe Date: June 17, 1988 Subject: DECENTRALIZATION OF 1ST CALL FOR HELP /UNITED WAY SERVICES Recommendation: Agenda Item # vii c. Consent ❑ Information Only Fx-] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That Edina not make a commitment at this time to decentralization of 1st Call for Help. Info /Background: See attached memo from John Senior, Jr. M E M 0 R A N D.0 M TO: Mayor Courtney & Council Members FROM: John Senior, Jr., Chair - Human Relations Commission SUBJECT: DECENTRALIZATION OF 1ST CALL FOR HELP /UNITED WAY SERVICES DATE: June 17, 1988 The subject of decentralization of United Way services /1st Call for Help has been brought before many of our neighboring suburbs and now before Edina. Through the direction of the Edina City Council, the Human Relations Commission has done research on this subject. . After talking to Larry Oppold, Director of South Hennepin Human Services Council, and Louis Hofeld, Division Director of 1st Call for Help through the United Way, it is our feeling that Edina need not make any commitment at this time. It seems the United Way, with their current grant from the McKnight Foundation, is already starting a decentralization of services which will affect the northern suburbs, Ramsey, Carver and Dakota counties. Through their usage studies, they feel that the services already available'to our area are adequate. They are currently working on computer software that will be offered to any city or service for use in PC setups.. This software will be updated monthly and may be of use to Edina in coordination with the family services center slated for opening.in January of 1989 at the Community Center. United Way is currently negotiating with Hennepin County regarding the use of their staff person now located in Bloomington. This person could be used for Edina, Richfield, Eden Prairie and Bloomington. This option does seem.to be a lower priority to United Way /1st Call for Help staff. If progress is made on the Bloomington location, it would be of minor cost and would be shared by the cities involved. With computer software available in the next year and a possible Bloomington location, we feel that there will be different options available to Edina, and if we get a better feel of which service will best serve Edina, we may choose at that time which way to participate. c r1� �1 may° �'N�RBP80���9 • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & Council Members From: Kenneth E. Rosland Date: June 17, 1988 Subject: FEES & CHARGES STUDY Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion That the Council review and react to the attached Fees & Charges Study. Info /Background: Attached please find a fees and charges study. I don't believe any action is needed at the present time; however, this is just one portion of the many materials which you will be receiving over the next several months that will all culminate in the budget process. We are sending these to you as they become available so that you will have the opportunity to read them and not be submerged with a lot of material just prior to budget hearings. Also, if this fees and charges format is not of your liking or what you are looking for, please notify me and we will try to make changes. Health Department: Ordinance No . Fee Description 434 Outdoor Swimming Pool License 434 Whirlpool License Fees and Charges Study Amount Justification of Amount Charged $ 125.00 per year Inspect outdoor swimming pools for water quality and proper safety equipment Health department staff perform 5 inspections.per year resulting in 5 hours $ 50.00 per year Inspect whirlpool for proper safety equipment and water quality. Health Department staff perform 5 to 12 inspections per year per pool resulting in 1 to 2 hours per whirlpool. 434 Indoor Swimming Pool $ 230.00 per year Inspect swimming P License B pool for health and safety com liance: Measure chlorine an PH Of pool water, provide a safe swimming environment for the public. Investiga e complaints about pools and reports of disease outbreaks. Minimum of 12 inspections per year. resulting in staff time of 12 hours per year per pool. r 712 Septic Tank Installation $ 25.00 per installation inspect design and Permit installation of septic systems to prevent malfunctions of systems causing land and water pollution. No systems installed in the past 15 years. Estimate 1 hour of health department staff time per installation 1 I 712 Septic Tank pumping $ 20.00 per permit Investigate and monitor routine Permit pumping of septic tanks. Maintain a record of tank pumping on all properties with septic tanks. Health department staf spends 45 minutes per permit. Department: Health Ordinance No. Fee Description 721 License to produce, distribute and haul milk Food Establishment License 731 I 731 I Take out food establishment license 731 I Packaged food sales license Fees and Charges. Study Amount $ 100.00 per annum $ 320.00 per annum $ 215.00 per annum $ 100.00 per annum 731 Food Warehouse License $ 45.00 per annum I 731 Itinerant Food Establish $ 45.00 per event ment' license Justification of Amount Charged This license should be repealed as it is no longer valid Inspect food establishment for safe food handling practice, prevent foc illness outbreaks, investigate complaints, train foodhandlers, provide quarterly newsletters to licensed facilities, and provide compliance inspections. All services provided by Health Department staff equaling 10 to 12 hours per year for each licensed facility. Inspect food establishment for safe food handling practice, prevent foo( illness outbreaks, investigate complaints, train foodhandlers, provide quarterly newsletters to licensed facilities, and provide compliance inspections. All services provided by Health Department staff equaling 3 to 6 hours per facility. Inspect food establishment for safe food handling practice, prevent food Illness outbreaks, investigate complaints, train foodhandlers, provide quarterly newsletters to licensed facilities, and provide compliance inspections. All services provided by Health Department staff equaling 2 to 4 hours per year for each facility. Provide inspections to insure food is warehoused in a safe and sanitary manner. Estimate 1 to 2 hours inspection time per facility by health deparment staff. Provide health department inspection of each food stand. Prevent foodborne illness outbreaks by-ensuring safe food handling procedures are implemented Staff time is 1 hour per license. Health - Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 731 Retail Candy License $ 30.00 per annum Inspect candy shops to ensure candy is handled in a safe altaar—er. Health department staff time is 1 hour per license. 731 Food Vehicle License S 50.00 per annum per $25.00 per ann for 5 or more vehicles Inspect food vehicles to ensure food is transported in a savehicle, manner. Health department staff provides 2 to 8 hours er license depending on the number of vehiclesP 731 .751 Food.Vending Machines Fumigating Permit $15.00 per annum per vending machine $12.00 per permit Inspect Vending Machine for cleanliness. Sample food items for micro - biological analysis, respond to consumer complaints. Staff time equals 15 minutes to 1 hour per year for each license. No longer valid due to inactivity -- ordinance should be repealed. 761 Hotel, Lodging and Boarding License $100.00 per year for UP to 50 rooms and $1.00 per room above 50 Inspect lodging facilities for health and safe t y. No such facilities at this time. Estimate 1 to 3 hours er P year for inspection and enforcement actions of Health department staff time. 1301 Garbage Hauler's License $ 50.00 per annum plus $ 30.00 for each additlo al vehicle over one . ' Inspect trucks for safety and maintenance. Respond to complaints from the public about garbage haulers. Health department staff spends 60 to 80 hours Per Year on this service. 1302 - Scavenger License $ 25.00 for first licens $ 15.00 for renewal ther - after License required to pump septic tanks. Purpose is to identify where the pumpers dispose of the sewage and prevent inna Health department staff spends 30 minutes per license at al of sewage. P er y year. ear. y Department: Planning Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 451 Sign b Bench Permit Sign = $ 50.00 Review Applications . per ordinance sign ordinance enforcement / Bench Monitor Bench = $ 10.00 per year Location and inspect condition. Staff time necesssary to check applications and provide enforcement (1 to 2 hours technical management) 801 Plat and Subdivision $ 225.00 + $ 5.00 per to Review proposal, staff report and recommendation, Filing publication and notice to property owners. Fee involves staff time, public hearings, mailings and publications. (Many hours by Technical Management and Executive Management staff) 825 Rezoning $ 600.00 Review proposal, staff report and recommendation,publication and notice to property owners. Fee involves staff.time, public hearings, mailings, and publications (many hours by technical management and executive management staff) 825 Temporary Retail Sales in a PID $ 300.00 per sale Review permit and arrange for inspections by the Police and Fire Departments Fee includes staff review and inspection of premises (3 to 5 hours by Fire, Police and technical personnel) 825 Conditional Use Permit $ 500.00 Review proposal, staff report and recommendation, publication and notice to property owners. Fee includes staff time, public hearings mailings and publications (range of hours committed based on complexity of proposal Planning Department: Fees and Charges Study y Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 825 Variance Residential = $ 50.00 Non- Residential = $100.0 Review proposal, staff report and recommendation, and public hearings. Fee includes staff time and and Technical management time involves wide.range of proposal) notice to property owners cost of mailings. (Clerical of hours based on complexi 825 Final Development Plan $ 200.00 Same as Rezoning 825 Lot Division 1 I i $ 20.00 ' Review proposal, staff report and recommendation. preparation plus meeting time. Normally an hour Department: Police Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Staff time includes background checks on applicants, 201 Public Dance Permit Level $5:00 per Event I review of application, approval b PP y police chief, and planning time for Police resources needed to cover the event. There is a high potential for police activity for this type of permit. Background check involves a clerical person checking state r national records on individuals owning or managing the licensed business or activity plus checking on previous calls for service at the location. This information is submitted to the Chiuef for his review and action. Other City officials may also review and act on the permit, i.e. City Clerk Health Department, etc. 202 Bowling Alley License $10.00 per year er P Staff time includes background checks alley on applicants, review of application and approval by chief. High B potential for police responses due to Juveniles Background checks and staff review are performed the same as listed in previous Justification. 203 Kart Track License $5.00 per Kart No Kart Tracks currently located in Edina $40.00 Minumum 204 Bingo, Gambling $25.00 Device License Staff time includes background checks on applicants, review by staff and approval by Chief. Potential for frequent q police responses. Background checks and staff review are performed the same as listed In the first Justification. 211 Mechanical Amusement $25.00 per establishme t Staff time Includes background Devices (Pinball, etc.) plus $5.00 per machine checks on applicants, review by staff and approval b Chief. Potential for frequent pP y q Police responses. Background checks and staff review are performed the same as listed In the first Justification. Department: Folice Fees and Charges Study , Ordinance No . Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Fees offer partial recovery of costs of animal control program including 312 Dog License Neutered initial License - $7.00 the investigation of complaints, animal bites, and patrol for animal Annual Renewal -$3.00 violations. Licensing provides a means of identification and insures Non- neutered Initial animal imunlzation against rabies. Additional costs include clerical license - $20.00 and computer time involved in selling and maintaining license records. Annual Renewal - $6.00 312 Disposal of Dead $10.00 plus fees Recovery of costs involved in picking up and disposing of dead Animal charged by vet animals. 312 Redemption of impounded 1st impound - $25.00 Recover of costs involved in pickup and kenneling of loose animal 2nd impound - $50.00 animals. Progressive fee for frequent violators. 3rd or more - $100.00 plus $7.00 per day kennel fee 312 Commercial Kennel $50.00 None in Edina at present - fee charges would probably be License used to cover potential complaints or inspections. 1032 Loudspeaker Permit $5.00 Staff time includes review and approval by police chief and other city Officials. This permit creates a high probability of police response to complaints. e Fees and Charges Study NO. Description Amount FiRegistration Justification of Amount Charged Employee Parking Fermat $24.00 per p year or Fee charged to partially recover and France $2.00 per month the costs of issuing permits, enforcement pro- of parking regulations, and for the value of extended parking P B Privilege. rated er and Solicitor $15.00 er_ ear P y Fee used to partially recover tration the costs of background checks on applicants and the reponse to high numbers of complaints about solicitors. 1307 License for sale of $50.00 / $100.00 No businesses of this motor bikes/ license type in Edina for renting motor bikes 1321 Cigarette Sale License $12.00 each counter Fee or machine covers costs of approval process through various City departments,' potential for inspections and complaint investigations. 1331 Taxicab Driver License $5.00 Staff time includes background checks on applicants, approval by chief and various departments. 1353 Massage parlor and Business - $250.00 Staff time includes background check individual massage license Individual - $50.00 of applicants and approval by police chief. A very detailed background analysis is done in these Investigation fee cases. Businesses would also be inspected by building, health deposits: and planning departments. Very high possibility of Business - $1500 regulatory inspections and /or complaint investigation. Individual - $50 Police Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 1761 False alarm response fee $50.00 for 3rd . and subsequent false alarm in each calendar year. Partial recovery in costs involved in responding to alarm calls plus costs Involved in the false alarm reduction program. Each alarm call requires two officers. Costs of the alarm reduction program Include recordkecping, printing, and billing. 1432 Taxicab License $10.00 er vehicle p Background checks on business owners and managers, approval by police chief and other departments, cost of license stickers and potential for complaint investigations. Department: Parks Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Playground Program $ 21.00 To help offset the costs of one director, 20 instructors, supplies, and paperwork. Resolution T -Ball $ 21.00 To help offset the costs of one director, 2 instructors, uniforms, equlpmen , and paperwork. Resolution Tennis Instruction $ 21.00 To help offset the costs of one director, 3 instructors,.equipment, and paperwork. Resolution Facility Rental To offset cost of wear and tear of facility and litter removal. Braemar Ballfields -no ligh s $ 35.00 1hr Braemar Ballfields- lights $ 55.00 /hr General Park Areas - commerc al $ 50.00 /hr Picnic Shelter -Lake Cornel a up to 50 people $ 35.00 over 50 people $ 65.00 Showmoblle $550.00 /day Athletic Field -no lights $ 30 /game Athletic Field- lights $ 50 1game Portable Bleachers $100 /day or $50 /hr + delivery charge Picnic Equipment free Tupa Park $125.00 /day Resolution Field Maintenance $ 5.00 /player To offset field maintenance cost for athletic association i I� 1 - games. Department: Golf Fees and Charges Study dy Ordinance No.. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Patron Cards For reservation rivile es and P g greens fees discounts to Edina residents. Individual $ 50.00 Additional $ 45.00 Resolution Greens Fees Offset golf course operational costs and provide customers with top quality 18 -hole patron $ 9.50 golf course for their enjoyment. Goal Is to continue to improve the course Provides lower rates to Edina residents. 18 -hole senior patron $ 8.50 18 -hole non - patron $ 13.00 18 -hole senior non - patron $ 12.00 Top price Metro area: $ 17.00 (1 course) 9 -hole Bottom price Metro area: $ 10.00 patron $ 6.50 9 -hole senior patron $ 6.00 Average price Metro area: $ 11.00 Braemar price: $ 13.00 9 -hole non - patron $ 8.00 9 -hole senior non - patron $ 7.50 18 -hole group fee $ 16.00 9 -hole group fee $ 10.00 Resolution Computer Handicap Service $ 10.50 USGA Handicap Service for customers. Ma Major j part of fees goes to computer Resolutio Lockers company. Balance covers cost of maintaining. Mens 72" locker $ 33.00 Offset Golf Course operational costs including cleaning and Mens 42" locker $ 22.00 maintenance of Ladies locker rooms. 72" locker $ 14.00 Resolutio I Group Lessons Basic Lessons $ 44.00/5 lessons Covers cost of use Advanced Basic Lessons $ 50.00/5 lessons of space on driving range, balls furnished, and service of five professional instructors. Golf Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Offset Golf Course operational costs and encourage junior golf. Resolution Junior Book (10 rounds) $ 45.00 Available Edina residents 12 -18 years old. Resolution Motor Golf Cars 18 -hole $ 18.00 Offset Golf Course operational and cost of initial cost of cars 18 -hole senior $ 15.00 plus maintenance of same. 9 -hole $ 9.50 9 -hole senior $ 8.00 18 -hole group rate $ 20.00 v Resolution Pull Cart $ 1.75 Offset Golf Course operational costs. Club Rental $ 5.00 Offset Golf Course operational costs. Golf - Executive Course Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Executive Course Greens Fee Adult - Patron $ 5.00 To offset operational costs and to continue to make improvements and provid Adult - Non - patron $ 6.00 .quality golf course. Sr. and Jr. Patron $ 4.00 Sr. and Jr. Non - patron $ 5.00 Group Fee $ 7.00 Motorized Golf Car $ 6.00 Top Rate $ 6.00 (Braemar) Pull Cart $ 1.75 Bottom Rate $ 5.00 Average Rate $ 5.25 Driving Range Large Bucket $ 3.75 To offset cost of balls, operating costs, and upkeep of range area. Small Bucket $ 2.25 Warm -up Bucket i i $ 1.00 Department: Golf - Grill — r_ Fees and Charges Study Ordinance :::q No Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Food Sales Retail prices of food and beverages sold in grill cover cost of food, food preparation, and expenses of operating and cleaning grill area. Based on 35 percent food cost industry standard. Department: Golf - Clubhouse Fees and Charges Study, Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Braemar Room Rental Costs based on costs of cleaning, maintenance, and supervision with lower rates to residents of Edina. Market rate. Night Rate - Resident $ 450.00 Night Rate - Non - resident $ 500.00 Day Rate - Resident $ 225.00 Day Rate - Non - resident $ 275.00 Market price varies with size and location. Average comparable price Is $450. Top Rate $700 Bottom Rate $300 (VFW) Edinborough Park re artment: Fees and Charges Study y ance No. Fee Description Amount. Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Table Rental to Edina Park Plaza b Corporate $5.00 per table Offset wear and tear of equipment Center East Building Rentals Category N1 City of Edina - Boards $125 per day plus $12 per man /per hour for set -up and tear Token fee consideration for Park and Recreation sponsored programs - Balance is inkind agreement and Associations down Building Rentals Category K2 (Per Hour) Per Hour Area $ 100 Great Hall Offset cost of park maintenance and utilities Edina based civic $ 40 Arena organizations including $ 40 Theatre Edina Schools $ 60 Pool $ 25 Grotto Building Rentals Category p2 (Exclusive Use) Exclusive Use (4 -6 hour rental) Fee Area Offset cost of park operations. Minimum fee is $475 with additional fees based on additional areas used. Edina based civic $475 Great Hall organizations including $ 75 Arena Edina Schools $ 75 Theatre Building Rentals Category N3 (Per Hour) Per Hour Area $250 Great Hall Offset cost of park mainetnance and utilities with profit margin Included Edina residents /business $ 60 Arena $100 Theatre $100 Pool $ 60 Grotto aen : Park FEdinborough Fees and Charges Study No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Building Rentals Exclusive Use To offset park operations based on consistency of market Category q3 (4 -6 hour rental) values in Metropolitan area. Minimum fee is $800 with additional fees based (Exclusive Use) Fee Area on additional areas used. Edina residents /business $800 Great Hall $150 Arena $150 Theatre $200 Pool Building Rentals Per Hour Area Offset cost of park maintenance and utilities with profit margin included Category p4 (Per Hour) $300 Great Hall Non -Edina resident and $ 85 Arena business $150 Theatre $150 Pool $ 85 Grotto Building Rentals Exclusive Use To offset park operations based on consistency of, market values in Category #4 (4 -6 hour rental) Metropolitan area. Minimum fee is $1000 with additional fees based (Exclusive Use) Fee Area on additional areas used. Non -Edina residents and $1000 Great Hall business $200 Arena $200 Theatre $250 Pool Dance Floor $ 50 Offset wear and tear of equipment Mirror Ball $ 20 Offset wear and tear of equipment Catering Kitchen Range: Charged to caterers to cover maintenance and clean -up as well as use I Groups 200 $ 50 of equipment Groups 300 $ 75 Groups 500+ $100 Commercial Use - trade $ 2,000 To cover cost of p park operation which is consistent with market values in shows, etc. the Metropolitan area with additional rationalization of using public e. Edinborough Park Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Daily Pass for Pool, Track, Open Basketball $ 2.50 Offset the cost of facility operations Locker Fee $ .25 For use of lockers in locker rooms (quarter returned at completion of use) Towel Fee $ .50 To cover cost of towel service Skate Rental $ 1.25 To cover the cost of and upkeep of skate inventory Box Lunch Program range $6 - $10 To cover the cost of food and preparation to include an approximate 33% profit margin in lieu of rental cost of area with groups of 50 plus . Domestic Photography Range Per Hour: Fee based on area of park used. Justified as a location fee giving us the by Professional $50 - Grotto ability lose Y to park area from general public during photo session as well Photographers $75 - Great Hall or as a way to minimze and control volume of requests. Mixed use $100 -Ice Rink 6 Great Hall Comnercial Photography Range Per Hour: Same as domestic photographer with the increased rate based on the principl by Professional $150 - Grotto of using public property at the expense of public use for a profit making Photographers $200 - Amphitheatre venture $300 - Great Hall $400 - Ice Rink $500 - Mixed Use Birthday Party Table $15 per table with Offset cost of set -up /tear -down and clean up. In addition the Set -Ups limit of two tables cost rationalizes closing West Commons park area from the public and minimizes with seating of 16 and controls volume of requests. Department: Arena Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Based on competitive market rate and operational and maintenance break even Resolution Ice Rental Contract $75 /hr Prime $80 /hr Non -Prime $60 /hr Skate Rental $1.06 tax included Competitive with market rates. Skate Sharpening $1.50 Competitive with market rates. Public Skating $2.50 tax included To be in line with the Pool and Edinborough. Cost is high but does not mee hourly ice rates. Season Tickets Resident Individual $32.00 tax included Concept is only available in one other Arena and that is a swimming, ice, Resident Family $52.00 tax included racquetball facility resulting in a much higher pass price. Non - resident Individual $37.00 tax included Non - resident Family $62.00 tax included Merchandise Competitive with market rates. Laces $1.59 tax included Hockey Tape $1.59 tax included Dry Floor Rental $500 per day Competitive with market rates. Parking Lot Rental $100 per day For large companies, movie crews, etc. Cu"t reaction to price. Concession Sales Retail prices of food and beverages sold in concession area cover cost of food, food preparation, and expenses of operating and cleaning concession area. Based on 35 percent food cost industry standard. Department: Pool Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged $2.50 per swim On the high end of the competitive market. Resolution Daily Admission children or adults Season Tickets Resident Individual $ 28.00 To help offset the operational and administrative costs of running a 450,00 Resident Family $ 44.00 gallon municipal pool. Non - Resident Individual $ 33.00 Non - Resident Family $ 50.00 Concession Sales Retail prices of food and beverages sold in concession area cover cost of food, food preparation, and expenses of operating and cleaning concession area. Based on 35 percent food cost industry standard. Swim Instruction $ 21.00 To help offset the transportation and teaching costs of running an aquatic swim program for 900 participants. Pool Rental $428.00 /day plus any Offered only to the Edina Swim Club one weekend a year for their Aquatennia out of pocket expenses Meet. The fee is used to help offset the revenue lost over the weekend and i.e. personal, cost of is competitive with the market. goods sold, etc. ° Department: Fire Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 612 Special Hazard Permit $ 25.00 / year Fee based on complexity of hazard or size of facility, Level I Level I - minumum _ time is expected to be 1 hour. Service provided: consultation concerning codes and regulations for the safe handling of materials or processes, plan review, field inspection and emergency response 612 Special Hazard Permit $ 50.00 / year Fee based on complexity of hazard or size of facility, Level II Level II minumum time is expected to be greater than 1 hour and require additional efforts: Service provided: consultation concerning codes and regulations for the safe handling of materials or processes, plan review, field inspection and emergency response 612 Special Hazard Permit $ 100.00 / year Fee based on complexity of hazard or size of facility. Level III Level III will require several hours and several inspections. Service provided: consultation concerning codes and regulations for the safe handling of materials or processes, plan review, field inspection and emergency response 645 Installation permit min fee - $40.00 Service provided include consultation with owners, developers, and contract sprinkler fire to + $300.00 rs plan review, and field inspection. Fee is based protection system on amount of work involved and size of system. Minimum work would require one field inspector for plan review and field inspection. 645 Installation Fire Pump i $ 45.00 Services include consultation, field inspection, plan review and testing. Minimum work requires one inspection and several site inspections. 661 False Fire Alarm $ 165.00 For the third emergency fire response p per year - minimum response includes one engine with four men for 30 minutes i Fire Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 645 Inspection - fire $ 45.00 + 5.00 for Services provided include consultation on design, plan review and field control standpipes additional standpipes inspection to assure compliance with codes and regulations. Minimum of one inspector and multiple site visits. 643 License to service $ 10.00 per person Services include inspection of applicants test scores fire extinguishers annually and maintenance of records. Time involved is approximately 10 minutes per applicant. 644 Permit to clean comm- $ 30.00 per inspection Services include 24 hour call for inspection, field inspection, ercial cooking vent- approval consultation, and record keeping. Minimum 30 minutes to 1 hour per ilation systems inspection. 645 Installation of Fire minimum $45.00 to Fee is adjusted based on cost of installation (size alarm system $ 300.00 + of system). Service provided includes consultation with designer, contractor, and owner, plan review and field inspection. Resolution Fee for Ambulance Transportation protection system Level I $ 50.00 Specialized care at scene without transport. May involve drugs, cardiac monitoring, etc. Level II $235.00 Basic Level of care with transport, splinting, bands in g, ,etc. Level III _$285.00 Moderate care with transport, I.V. Setup, p, EKG, etc. Level IV $385.00 Level III care plus additional services of medication, etc. Fire Department: Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Resolution Fee for Ambulance Transportation continued Level V $385.00 Level IV services plus CPR or defibrillation Additional Chg. $ 50.00 For "out of area" transport - downtown hospitals All charges based on extra level of service of paramedics (ALS) and to defray some additional costs associated with emergency response, drugs, equipment, supplies, overtime and man - hours. 406 Code compliance Inspection i i $ 60.00 minimum plus Fee based on time involved for consultation and plan review. Requires $ 60.00 per hour a minimum of one inspector. Department: Administration Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 902 Sunday (Clubs Only) $ 250.00 per annum Staff time of Clerk, Police and Health Departments in issuance of license Intoxicating liquor and regulatory enforcement. Includes background checks on applicants license (20 minutes per applicant), police management (15 minutes per applicant), inspection of liquor /storage /service areas 4 times per year (2 to 3 hours per year by technical management personnel), and clerical /clerk time (1+ hours). 902 Intoxicating liquor $ 1,400.00 per annum Staff time of Clerk, Police and Health Departments in issuance of license, on -sale license and regulatory enforcement. Includes background checks on applicants (20 minutes per name checked), police management (15 minutes per applicant), Inspection of liquor storage /service area four times per year (2 -3 hours per year by technical management personnel) and clerical /clerk time (2 hours). 902 Non - intoxicating malt liquor $ 220.00 per annum Staff time of Clerk, Police, and Health departments In issuance of license on -sale license for new license regulatory enforcement. Includes background checks on applicants (20 $ 165.00 per annum minutes per name checked), police management (15 minutes per application), for renewal inspection of liquor storage /service area,4 times per year (1 -2 hours per year by technical management personnel), and clerical /Clerk time (new 2 hours, renewal 1+ hours). 902 Non - intoxicating malt liquor $220.00 per annum Staff time of Clerk, Police and Health Departments in issuance of license off -sale license for new license and regulatory enforcement as necessary. Includes background checks on $ 165.00 per annum applicants (20 min. per name checked per application), police management I for renewal (15 min. per application), and clerical /clerk time (new -2 hours/ renewal 1+ hours). Department: Administration Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 902 On -sale vine license Staff time of Clerk, Police and Health Departments in issuance of license per year - restaurants with and regulatory enforcement. Includes background checks on applicants (20 50 or fewer seats $ 550.00 min. per application), police management (30 min. per application), 51 -100 seats inclusive 600.00 regulatory inspection (2 -3 hours, plus additional inspection if complaint), 101 -150 seats inclusive 650.00 inspection of liquor storage /service area4 times per year (2 -3 hours by Over 150 Seats 700.00 technical management g personnel), and clerical /clerk time (1+ hours). by statute fee shall not exceed 1/21 icense fee for on -sale liquor license 902 Manager's license $50.00 per year Staff time of Clerk and Police Department in issuance of license. Includes background checks on applicants (20 min. per name checked)', police management (15 min. per application), limited enforcement (time varies), and clerical /clerk time (1 hour). 902 Temporary non - intoxicating $35.00 Staff time of Clerk and Police Department in issuance of license. liquor on sale license Includes background checks oq applicants (20 min. per name checked), police i i I. management (15 min. per application),and clerical /clerk time (l hour). Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 406 Building Permit Based on Valuation: Fee structure set by the State of Minnesota. Fee includes the guarantee that the work is being accomplished by a licensed Valuation Amount worker and inspections are made by technical management personnel $1 to $500 $15.00 when installation is large or the department receives a call that the work is complete. Will not inspect permits that department does not $501 to $2000 $15 for first $500 plus receive a call back on, however, there are occasional spot check calls. $2 for each add'tl $100 Inspections involve technical management and clerical time (1+ hours'). $2001 to $25000 $45 for first $2000 plus $9 for each add'tl $1000 $25001 to $50000 $252 for first $25000 pl s $6.50 for each add'tl $1 00 $50000 to $100000 $414.5 for first $50000 plus $4.50 for each add' :l $1000 $100000 to $500000 $639.5 for first $100000 plus $3.50 for each add' :l $1000 $500000 to $1000000 $2039.5 for first $50000 plus $3.00 for each add' :l $500000 $1000000 and up $3539.5 for first $10000)0 plus $2 for each add'tl $1000 Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance - No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 408 Building Code Compliance $60.00 per hour Fee charged to perform inspection of installation to ensure compliance Inspection minimum $60 fee with municipal and state building codes. Includes 1 hour for inspection (technical management) and 30 min for paperwork (clerical). 411 Permit for moving of $50.00 Coordinate move with Police.and Engineering to ensure traffic safety buildings and road capacity. Includes one inspection by technical.mangement personnel (1 hour), police /engineering time (1 hour) and clerical time (15 minutes). 411 Indemnity for damages $500.00 Fee to cover damages to public property during the moving of sustained by reason of buildings. the moving of buildings 429 Oil burner's installer's $25.00 Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical license, stoker installer's worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on license, hot water heating large installations and where the building department receives installer's license, mech. a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made warm air installer's license, when the finishing call is not received, however, there are air conditioning installer's occasional spot check calls. license and refridgeration installer's license. i 431 Gas£itting License $25.00 Same as above 431 Water conditioning $25.00 Same as above equipment installation permit Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No.. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 432 -A1 Plumbing permit, Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical gas fitting permit worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives Each fixture $8.00 a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made Rough -in fixtures $6.00 when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional Setting fixtures on prev. spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for rough -in $6.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff Beer Dispenser $5.00 Blow off Basin $9.00 Catch Basin /Flammable waste trap $9.00 Electric Water Heater $9.00 Hydraulic Valve $9.00 Manholes $9.00 New ground run for existing bldgs. $9.00 Roof Drains $9.00 Sump and Receiving Tanks $9.00 Water treating device $9.00 For extending water lines: $9.00 automatic washer refridgerator cut into line Air conditioning sprinkler system (fire /lawn) Sewer - sanitary or storm i $18.00 Water $18.00 Installing Water Meter $18.00 Taps: 3/4 inch $100.00 1 inch $100.00 Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 432 -A1 Plumbing permit, Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical gas fitting permit worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on (continued) large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made Road Repair: when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional Blacktop 2 x 4' hole $120.00 spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for Concrete 2 x 4' hole $120.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff For 3 openings on gas Up to 2" $13.00 Each add'tl opening up to 2" $2.00 Over 2" $18.00 Each addt'l opening over 2" $2.00 Gas Stove $9.00 Hot water heater up to 99,000 BTU $9.00 each addt'l 100,000 BTU $6.00 Gas Light i $9.00 Gas Barbeque i $9.00 1 Incinerator $15.00 Minimum Permit Fee $12.00 Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance .No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Warm air, ventilation, Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical air conditioning, varm worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on air winter heating work large installations and where the building department receives permit a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made when the finishing call is not received, however,'there are occasional spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for Furnace - including ducts, technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff registers, etc. up to 100,000 BTU $23.00 each add'tl 50,000 BTU $8.00 Replacement- furnace only up to 100,000 BTU $13.00 each add'tl 50,000 BTU $8.00 Alteration, additions or repairs to existing syst. . Up to $500.00 $13.00 Each add'tl $500.00 $8.00 Air conditioning coils added to existing syst. up to 1,000 CFM $18.00 each add'tl 1000 CFM $8.00 Direct gas fired unit used.as a winter air conditioning system up to 100,000 BTU $23.00 each add'tl 50,000 BTU $8.00 Department: Building Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Warm air all -year Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical conditioning system worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on work permit large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made when the finishing call is not received, however,,there are occasional Furnace -air conditioning spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for coil,ducts,registers,etc. technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff 100,000 BTU heating and 1,000 CFM air cond. $33.00 Each add'tl 50,000 BTU and 1,000 CFM $8.00 Duct systems-heating - air conditioning Up to $500.00 $13.00 each add'tl $500.00 $8.00 Each system - heating and cooling up to 1000 CFM $16.00 each add'tl 1000 CFM $6.00 Heating or Cooling only up to 1000 CFM $16.00 each add'tl 1000 CFM i $6.00 Alterations,addtions or repairs to existing syst. up to $500.00 $13.00 each add'tl $500.00 $8.00 Departments °ilding Fees and Charges Study Ordinance .No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Summer air conditioning ork permit (such as attic Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical its v /fan coil or fan worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on oil in basement) large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made Each system incl. duct work when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional p to 1000 CFM $18.00 spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for each add'tl 1000 CFM $8.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff Iteration, additions or repairs to existing systems p to $500.00 $11.00 each add'tl $500.00 $6.00 igh Velocity systems (small pipe and diffuser type systems) p to 1200 CFM $22.00 each add'tl 1200 CFM $27.00 Ventilation work permit General ventilation - including fan and duct systems up to 2000 CFM $20.00 eachiadd'tl 1000 CFM $8.00 Noxious vapors and /or flammable material spraying up to 2000 CFM $20.00 each add'tl 1000 CFM $8.00 Departmentauilding Fees and Charges- Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical 433 Ventilation work permit ontim, d worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives Domestic type kitchen or a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made bathroom exhaust system when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional Each system $18.00 spot-check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for each add'tl system $7.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff Direct gas fired air systems Up to $500.00_ $22.00 Each add'tl $500.00 $11.00 Alterations, addtions or repairs to existing systems for each $500.00 $11.00 When direct fired gas units are used for warm air heating winter air conditioning systems Ord. No. 433 Sec.6(a) (1) shall apply Electric heating systems work1permit For first 28 KW 96000 BTU $18.00 For add'tl 14 KW 48000 BTU $9.00 DepartmentBuilding Fees and Charges. Study Ordinance No. Fee Description . Amount Justification of Amount Charged Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical 433 as Burner, gas stove, range, as log, etc. work permit worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made For any permit installing when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional as sioves,ranges,gas water spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for eaters, process gas burners, technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff or other similar gas burning evices not used in connection with a heating system, the fee charged shall be as follows for each such device included In such permit: Input: up to 99000 BTU $9.00 100000 to 199999 BTU $13.00 200000 to 399999 BTU $18.00 400000 to 599999 BTU $31.00 600000 to 999999 BTU $44.00 1000000 to 2499999 BTU $76.00 2500000 to 9999999 BTU $100.00 10000000 to 49999999 BTU $119.00 50000000 to 74999999 BTU $145.00 750010000 BTU and up $208.00 Alteration or repairs to existing burner or equipment Up to $100.00 $13.00 each add'tl $100.00 $8.00 and Charges Study -- - Department$-ilding Fees Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged ' 433 Gas Burner, gas stove, range, gas log, etc. work permit Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical (continued) worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made LP gas installations (incl. when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional piping, controls,diluter spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for etc.) technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff Tank - 500 gal. or less $13.00 2000 gal. or less $19.00 over 2000 gal. $30.00 Oil burners, tanks, and equipment work permit 011 burners connected to fuel oil tank not buried or enclosed: for inputs not over 2 gal. /hr $15.00 for inputs not over 4 gal. /hr $27.00 for inputs not over 7 gal. /hr $42.00 for inputs not over 18 gal. /hr $76.00 for inputs not over 75 gal. /hr $90.00 for [inputs not over 350 gal /hr $119.00 for inputs not over 500 gal /hr $144.00 for inputs over 500 gal. /hr $210.00 °epartmentpuilding Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No . Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged - 433 Oil burners, tanks, and equipment work permit (cont'd) Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made For any tank not buried or when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional enclosed: spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff 560 gallons or less $13.00 er 560 gallons $16.00 For any tank buried or to be enclosed: 560 gallons or less $13.00 Over 560 gallons $18.00 Over 2,000 gallons $34.00 Alterations or repairs to existing burner or equip.: Up to $100.00 $10.00 Each addt'l $100.00 $5.00 Gas Piping Work Permit Same as above Up to 2 "piping with 3 or less openings $13.00 Over 3 openings - per opening $2.00 Over 2 "piping with 3 or less openings $18.00 Over 3 openings - per opening $2.00 Fees and Charges Study - Department$Uilding Ordinance No. Fee Description Refrigeration system work Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 permit Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on f For each system up to and large installations and where the building department receives i including 36,000 BTU 3 tons $13.00 a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional Each addt'l 36,000 BTU $8.00 spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff 433 Factory Built Chimney and fireplace work permit Same as above For factory built chimney: up to 8" inside diameter $12.00 i Over 8" inside diameter $14.00 i I Factory built fireplace, Franklin Stove, fireplace stove, etc., when installed with a factory built chimney $17.00 433 Cleaning commercial and industrial air conditioning Same as above system and /or ventilation - I system work permit I Up to $500.00 $16.00 each additional $500.00 $10.00 i Note: Fee based on individual systems Departmentpuilding Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount . Justification of Amount Charged 433 Stokers and powdered fuel burner work permit Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on Installation of "a stoker where large installations and where the building department receives the grate area of the furnace a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made or boiler such stoker is when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional required to serve does not spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for exceed 14 sq. ft. $11.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff Each addt'l square foot in the grate area $1.00 Installation of a powdered fuel burner or burners where capacity of such burner does not exceed 350 lbs. per hour $9.00 For each addt'l 25 lbs. of capacity $1.00 Alterations or repairs to existing stoker or equipment: Same as above Up to $100.00 $11.00 a Each addt'l $100.00 $3.00 Department8uilding Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Steam or hot water system wort permit Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on Boiler and total system large installations and where the building department receives including, piping, radiators, a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made coils, converters, etc. when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for Up to 100,000 BTU /hr. input $22.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff each addt'l 50,000 BTU input $8.00 Boiler only - in connection with existing system Up to 240,000 BTU input $13.00 Each addt'l 50,000 BTU input $8.00 For installation of a piping system, miscellaneous piping, or additions, alterations, or repairs to a system Up to $500.00 cost $13.00 each addt'l $500.00 $8.00 433 I Steam or hot water system (for other than heating) same as above Same as above work permit Department$ ❑Llding Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Steam, hot water or chilled vater coil work permit Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on large installations and where the building department receives Each system including coils, a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made piping controls, valves, etc., when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional from existing system spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff If Heating or Cooling: up to 100,000 BTU $18.00 each addt'l 50,000 BTU $10.00 I£ Heating and Cooling: up to 100,000 BTU $22.00 each addt'l 50,000 BTU $12.00 Additions, alterations, or repairs: Up to $500.00 $13.00 each addt'l $500.00 $8.00 433 Power Plant Work Permit Same as above For any power plant having an inpu I t not exceeding 200,000 BTU /IHr. or 6 H.P. $12.00 I Each' addt'l 100,000 BTU input - or 3' HP $8.00 Department9uildina Fees and Charges Study Ordinance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 433 Paver Plant Work Permit continued Fee guarantees installation is being done by a licensed mechanical worker. Inspections are made by technical management staff on Alterations, repairs,to large installations and where the building department receives any power plant up to a call that the work has been finished. Inspections are not made $500.00 cost $12.00 when the finishing call is not received, however, there are occasional spot check calls. Approximately 30 minutes per inspection for each addt'l $500.00 cost $8.00 technical staff and 20 minutes for clerical staff 812 Permit for construction and amount equal to same as above maintenance of radio and that which would television antennas have been payable if building permit l had been applied for Department: Finance Fees and Charges Study Ordnance No. Fee Description Amount Justification of Amount Charged 1101 -1102 Sewer Rental 1 -2000 cu ft. $20.50 The rates for sewer,and water service are set to recover the costs 2001 -4000. 32.75 (supply, distribution, purification, collection, disposal, depreciation, 4001 -7000 56.25 and administration) of providing each service to the general public over 7001 1.10 /cu.ft. The costs of the public utility are reviewed annually with the rates adjusted accordingly. 1111 Water Usage 33 cents per 100 i i i cubic feet s � r o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: JOHN WALLIN, FINANCE DIRECTOR Date: JUNE 20, 1988 Subject: 1989 BUDGET HEARING DATES; Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII.E Consent Information Only [� Mgr . Recommends To HRA 0 To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommend that three dates be tentatively set up for 1989 Budget Hearings and that these hearings-be held between 4:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. on September 6, 8 and 15. Info /Background: The budget process will begin with a budget preview, which shows various budget assumptions, going to the Council on July 18.' The proposed budget will be ready for submission to the Council Members on September 1, 1988. 9 o e t� Cn leas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND CITY MANAGER From: GORDON HUGHES ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: 6120188 Subject: 1988 - 1989 STRATEGIC WORK PROGRAM Recommendation: Agenda Item # VII . G Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adoption of 1988 - 1989 Work Program. Info /Background: Attached is a draft of the 1988 - 1989 Strategic Work Program. The elements of this work program are based upon the issues which were identified at the strategic planning retreat. I suggest the Council review this on June 20 and offer recommendations which can be included in a final draft for the July 11 Council meeting. u 1988 - 1989 WORK PROGRAM ISSUE #1. - In -light -of the report of the Park and Recreation Task Force, how can Edina's parks, recreational facilities, and programs adapt to meet the future needs of our residents': Goal: Park and Recreation facilities and programs which respond to the changing needs and desires of the community. Focus: As part of the 1987 -88 work program, the Council established a citizen Task Force to assess our park and recreation facilities, park maintenance standards and fees and charges structure. The Task Force provided a "snapshot in time" of Edina's parks and facilities and also conducted a public opinion survey which obtained our resident's attitudes concerning the present park and recreation system. With the findings of the Park and Recreation Task Force, the City is now in a_ position to develop a strategy for park and recreation facilities and programs for the future. Short -Term Objectives: Update the commmunity facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan by adopting a year 2000 Park and Recreation Plan. Work Program: Assign the Park Board the task of undertaking and completing the year 2000 Edina Park and Recreation Plan. Staff services will be provided by the Planning Department and Park and Recreation Department. Elements of the Assignment * Review the Park and Recreation Task Force Report. * Involve the community organizations if desired by the Park Board * Establish goals and priorities concerning the Year 2000 park and recreation system with particular respect to: - Park and open space acreage - Park development - Recreation programming including specialized prograuuning such as adaptive recreation Review alternatives and .develop strategies to address identified goals Prepare a revised five year capital improvement plan Timetable: September, 1988 Organizational Meeting Council.& Park Board January, 1990 Comprehensive Plan Amendment � � 1 ISSUE #2. What steps should the City take to upgrade its aging infrastructure, particularly underground utilities? - -- - Goal: —_ A public infrastructure which is maintained in sound condition. Focus: Edina's basic utility system is in place with only a few areas of the City left unserved. However, much of the existing system is dated and may require upgrading, or capacity improvements to remain functional or to meet the needs created by more intense land uses. A related issue is the City's ability to develop a long range, stable revenue source to fund capital improvements. Short -Term Objective: Update the uiidergrouud utilities portion of community facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. Work Program and Timetable: Undertake a comprehensive water system plan analysis, storm water system elan analysis, and sanitary sewer system plan analysis. Amend community facilities element and capital improvement plan to reflect findings of system analysis - January 1990, ISSUE 0. How can the City expand its revenue sources in light of its inability to rely on traditional methods of raising revenues? Goal: Long term stability in city revenues with minimal reliance on other levels of government. Focus: The City's ability to provide efficient and effective municipal services continues to be compromised by our - inability to depend solely upon real estate taxes for revenue. This inability has been intensified in recent years clue to state tax policy which increases Edina's tax burden to the benefit of other cities. As a result, Edina tax payers will pay more taxes but may realize reduced municipal services. Other revenue sources must, therefore, be utilized if our present service levels are to continue. Short -Term Objectives: ;laximize return on the working capital fund within the investment parameters provided by law. Identify and review the feasibility of additional fees and charges to fund the capital improvement plan. Identify and review the feasibility of tapping non - traditional revenue sources for supporting the City operating budget, Work Program and Timetable: - - - - - - -- Cont -inue the work of the staff task force relative to fees and charges to fund the capital improvement plan. Establish a think tank of connnunity leaders to brainstorm alternative revenue sources. ISSUE #4. How can Edina maintain its" high- quality living and working enviroruuent in light of the effects of increased urbanization especially traffic related impacts? Goal: Minimize adverse impacts of high- volwue roadways on existing developments while providing roadways that operate at acceptable service levels. Focus: The Council has identified the ongoing trend of increased urbanization which is manifested in more intense developments and traffic and transportation related impacts such as congestion and noise. Of particular interest is the southeast quadrant of the City which is most affected by land use intensity and the regional roadway system. The development of the Hedberg property in Edina and the Homart property in Bloomington have increased the awareness of transportation related issues particular to the I -494 corridor. Short -Term Objective: Explore new methods of controlling traffic related impacts associated with the I -494 corridor. Work Program: Participate in the Joint Powers Organization being established among I -494 corridor cities. Implement a travel demand management ordinance or policy in connection with the Hedberg development. ISSUE #5. How will Edina comply with mandates imposed by Hennepin County regarding the diversion of recyclables from the solid waste stream? Goal: Divert 39% of the city -wide solid waste stream through recycling for calendar year 1992. Focus: Edina initiated a door -to -door residential recycling program serving approximately 3000 single family residences in 1986. The program was expanded to approximately 6000 homes.in 1988. In addition, the City maintains a recycling drop -off facility and has, by ordinance, mandated the separate collection of compostable materials. 'The present door -to -door program, the drop -off facility, and Lhe compost collection mandate are estimated to divert 10% of Edina's waste stream in 1988. Short Term Objective: - Provide household pickup of recyclables, at least on a monthly, basis, for all single family and two family dwellings, effective April 1, 1989. Accomplish a diversion of 16% of the City's solid waste stream for calendar year 1990. Work Program and Timetable: Request the Recycling Commission to present alternatives for city -wide household -collection for council review in connection with the adoption of the 1989 City budget. August, 1988 Present alternatives for city -wide household pick -up. April 1. 1989 Implement city -wide program Ongoing Cooperate with multi - residential buildings to encourage apartment condominium recycling. Cooperate with office buildings and other non - residential developments to promote recycling. Agenda Item VIII.A June 13, 1988 LANE AYRES ATTORNEY AT LAW 4407 Branson Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Telephone 348 -7530 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney City Council Member Glenn Smith City Council Member Peggy Kelly City Council Member Fred Richards City Council Member Leslie Turner City Hall 4801.West 50th Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: I am writing you on behalf of several individuals, including myself, who would like to urge you to consider a new building code ordinance at your June 20, 1988 meeting. In doing some checking about a potential residential addition which, if'.it happened, would be done primarily by the owner /occupant, we.find that Edina has no ordinance regulating how long a residential building project may take. It is presently possible that an addition or garage may be "in the process" of being built for two, three, or more years as long as appropriate permits are obtained in the beginning and other ordinances are complied with. We ask you to strongly consider a reasonable, one year limit from permit to exterior completion of residential building projects for which permits are required. I am enclosing a copy of a St. Louis Park ordinance that was enacted in 1984. St. Louis Park building inspectors say that the ordinance, intended to protect neighbors from the visual blight of unsightly, unending projects and property value declination, has worked well.. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. If you have any questions please let me know. ASin elane Ayr s cc:Gordon Hughes Section 15 -315. Smoke Detectors Required. All single and two - family structures shall be provided with smoke detectors on each level of the structure where rooms are used for sleeping purposes. Such smoke detectors shall be installed in accordance with the State ---- Bui -lding -Code: - — (Sec. 15 -315 added by Ord. 1602, 7118183) Section 15 -316. Requirements for Repair and Replacement Work. Any person doing any repair and /or replacement work on any residential building, structure and accessory structure covered in Section 15- 302(1) of the Ordinance Code shall complete any repair and /or replacement work in compliance with the standards contained in the definitions of repair and /or replacement in Section 15 -310. (Sec. 316 added by Ord. 1602, 7118183) Section 15 -317. Structural and Life Safety Standards. Compliance with the structural and life safety portions of any housing maintenance inspection required under Section 15 -302 shall be in accordance with the building code in effect at the time of original construction, provided there is no significant danger to health and safety at the time of inspection. If no building requirements were in effect at the time of construction or the requirements cannot be determined, compliance shall be made to an extent to eliminate significant danger to health and safety. This section is not meant to conflict with hazardous buildings within the terms of Sections 15 -400 & 15 -402; built -in deficiencies within Section 15 -313; and immediate hazards within Section 15 -314. 'Sec. 15- Ord. 1602 Section 15 -318. Exterior Completion: One- and Two-Family Residential. The roof and the building exterior of all sides of all single- and two - iamily structures, garages and accessory buildings shall be finished with exterior building materials as set forth in the State Building Code and the exterior architectural design requirements as provided in Sections 15 -220 through 15 -225 of this Code within 12 `months of the issuance of a building permit for new construction, alterations or relocation. (Sec. 15 -318 added by Ord. 1636 -84, 1115184) November 1984 744.3 Agenda Item VIII.A LANE AYRES ATTORNEY AT LAW 4407 Branson Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 June 13, 1988 Telephone 348 -7530 Mayor C. Wayne Courtney City Council Member Glenn Smith City Council Member Peggy Kelly City Council Member Fred Richards City Council Member Leslie Turner City Hall 4801 West 50th Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor and City Council Members: I am writing you on behalf of several individuals, including myself, who would like to urge you to consider a new building code ordinance at your June 20, 1988 meeting. In doing some checking about a potential residential addition which, if it happened, would be done primarily by the owner /occupant, we find that Edina has no ordinance regulating how long a residential building project may take. It is presently possible that an addition or garage may be in the process" of being built for two, three, or more years as long as appropriate permits are obtained in the beginning and other ordinances are complied with. We ask you to strongly consider a reasonable, one year limit from permit.to exterior completion of residential building projects for which permits are required. I am enclosing a copy of a St. Louis Park ordinance that was enacted in 1984. St. Louis Park building inspectors say that the ordinance, intended to protect neighbors from the visual blight of unsightly, unending projects and property value declination, has worked well. Thank you for your time and consideration of this proposal. If you have any questions please let me know. Sin�erel Lane Ayr s cc:Gordon Hughes APR F D Section 15 -315. Smoke Detectors Required. All single and two - family structures shall be provi ed with smoke detectors on each level of the structure where rooms are used for sleeping purposes. Such smoke detectors shall be installed in accordance with the State Building Code. (Sec. 15 -315 added by Ord. 1602, 7118183) Section 15 -316. Requirements for Repair and Replacement Work. Any person doing any repair and /or replacement work on any residential building, structure and accessory structure covered in Section 15- 302(1), of the Ordinance Code shall complete any repair and /or replacement work in compliance with the standards contained in the definitions of repair and /or replacement in Section 15 -310. (Sec. 316 added by Ord. 1602, 7118183) Section 15 -317. Structural and Life Safety Standards. Compliance with the structural and life safety portions of any housing maintenance inspection required under Section 15 -302 shall be in accordance with the building code in effect at the time of original construction, provided there is no significant danger to health and safety at the time of inspection. If no building requirements were in effect at the time of construction or the requirements cannot be determined, compliance shall be made to an extent to eliminate significant danger to health and safety. This section is not meant to conflict with hazardous buildings within the terms of Sections 15 -400 & 15 -402; built -in deficiencies within Section 15 -313; and immediate hazards within Section 15 -314. (Sec. 15 -317 added by Ord. -^ 1602, _ 7118183) Section 15 -318. Exterior Completion: One- and Two - Family Residential.'_____` The roof-and the building exterior of all sides of all single- and two - iamily structures, garages and accessory buildings shall be finished with exterior building materials as set forth in the State Building Code and the exterior architectural design requirements as provided in Sections 15 -220 through 15 -225 of this Code within 12 months of the issuance of a building permit for new construction, alterations or relocation. (Sec. 15 -318 added by Ord. 1636 -84, 1115184) November 1984 744.3 1988 CITY OF EDINA 267.85 -- - CHECK. REGISTER - - -10- 4570 - 260 -26 06 -20 -88 PAGE 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 162091 06/14/88 83,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 162091 06/14/88 83,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50-1010- 000 -00 MANUAL -LAUNDRY 50-4262-841 -84 .00 06/14/88 24.60 - AMERICAN LINEN - -- — — " " "- LAUNDRY - -- - - - - - -- " kkkkkk 95.08 k kkk -CKS 162825 06/14/88 2,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL 06 /08 /88 53.92 2,000.00 k REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540 - 841 -84 kkkk7k -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- kkk —CKS y- 172083 ____ -_ 06/14/88 - 267.85 -- - - AIBINSON- - _ BLUE PRINTING--------- - - -10- 4570 - 260 -26 267.85 » 172004 06/14/88 28.65 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY -- - - -10 -4262- 482 -48 1T2004 06/14/88 22.49 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 50-4262-821 -82 1TE004 06/14/88 19.34 AMERICAN LINEN -LAUNDRY 50-4262-841 -84 172004 06/14/88 24.60 - AMERICAN LINEN - -- — — " " "- LAUNDRY - -- - - - - - -- 50 -4262- 861-86 95.08 k 172008 06 /08 /88 53.92 KAMAN BEARING fi SPLY REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540 - 841 -84 53.92 k - -- -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- 172028 06/15/88 1,635.95 BEER WHOLESALERS COST OF GS 27 -4630- 663 -66 172028 06/10/88 1,269.46 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTOROY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172028 - 06 /10 /88 - - 2,448.70 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTOROY -" - -- 50- 4630 - 842 -84 172028 OG/14/88 1,535.05 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTOROY 50- 4630- 862 -86 6,889.1fi » kk #kkk 172031 06/15/88 - - - 13. SO - -- - BERTELSON BROS INC - -- - GEN SUPPL - -- - - - - -10 -4504- 510 -51 172031 06/15/88 20.16 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPL 10 -4504- 510 -51 172031 06/13/88 5.80 BERTELSON BROS INC SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 368291 172031 06 /07/88 38.88 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SPLIY 10- 4504 - 510 -51 172031 06/15/88 19.20 BERTELSON BROS INC GEN SUPPL 10 -4504- 510 -51 172031 06/10/88 13.80 BERTELSON BROS INC SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 kkkkkk 172033 06/08/88 100.50 BERGFORD TRUCKING COST OF GOODS SOLD 50- 4626- 822 -82 172033 06/08/88 184.00 BERGFORD TRUCKING INVENTORY 50- 4626- 842 -84 172033 06/08/88 165.00 - - BERGFORD TRUCKING -" INVENTOROY - -- "- - - -50- 4626- 862 -86 449.50 » 172035 06/09/88 94.78 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 520 -52 172035 -- 06/09/88 -- -- - — 874.60----- BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC — - — - CONT REPAIRS- - - -- 27- 4248 - 664 -66" 172035 06/09/88 1,899.40 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 » »» -CKS » »» -CKS *s*-CKS kkk -CKS kkk -CKS � S 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06-20 -88 PAGE 2 O� CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. N MESSAGE 172035 06/09/88 1,186.60 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 801 -80 172035 06/09/88 925.50 BOUSTEAD ELECTRIC CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 812 -80 4,980.88 s 172036 06/07/88 50.33 BRADY OFFICEWARE GEN SUP 10- 4504 - 420 -42 - - 50.33 » e'1 172037 06/10/88 242.50 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN PROF SER 10- 4201 - 260 -26 172037 06/10/88 752.50 BRAUN ENG TESTING IN UNALL CONST 60- 1270-000 -00 IN 995.00 s 172038 06/13/88 100.00 GEORGE BUTLER - SERVCIE ------------- - - - -10 -4100- 430 -42 100.00 » 172039 06/10/88 219.44 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC SUPPLIES - 10 -4504- 301 -30 172039 06/10/88 E25.55 BRYAN ROCK. PROD. INC SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 345 -30 17E039 05/10/85 284.38 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 345-30 172039 06/10/88 171.60 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC SUPPLIES 10-4504-545 -54 1TZ039 05/10!58 T5T.80 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FILL MATEARIAL5 40-4515-803-80 1TE037 05/10/88 435.95 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FILL MATERIALS 40-4515- 803-80 E,124.T3 M -- - — - ss� »FS **W-CKS © 172041 06/09/88 75.00 BURY A CARLSON INC FILL MATERIALS 10 -4518- 345 -30 17E041 00/09/88 1,589.46 BURY 6 CARLSON INC BLACKTOP 10- 4524- 301 -30 1,664.46 s - * » » » »s sss -CKS e 172046 06/15/88 650.01 BLUMBERG PHOTO CABLE TV POLICE 10-2149- 000 -00 650.01 » Q 172047 06/13/88 21.81- BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY SUPPLIES 30- 4516-781 -78 1TZ047 05/08/88 35.75 BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY OFF SUPPLIES 30- 4516-781 -T8 17Z04T 05/10/88 - 5.45 - -- - BLACK PHOTOGRAPHY - - SUPPLIES - - -- 30-4516- 781 -T8 19.39 s »» »-CKS 172051 06/15/88 132.25 BRAEMAR QUICK PRINT PRINTING 27- 4600- 661 -66 132. 25 s - - - -- - - - - - -- - -- -- - - 4A » » » » »» » »» -CKS ® 172054 06/08/88 25.66 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 172054 06/08/88 181.55 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 172054 06/08/88 104.52 - - BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS — - 10-4540-560 -56 ® 172054 06/08/88 41.40 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 172054 06/08/88 71.84 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-56 172054 06/08/88 41.40 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540- 560-56 172054 06/08/88 98.04 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 172054 06/08/88 98.04- BATTERY WAREHOUSE CORRECTIOON 10-4540 - 560 -56 -- s »» -CKS 7-1-77 ;, I 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. 11 MESSAGE 172058 06/13/88 100.00 WAYNE W BENNETT POLICE SERV 10- 4100- 430 -42 100.00 a « «« -CKS 172060 06/08/88 69.20 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE INVENTOROY 26- 46e4- 683 -68 69.20 a « «« —CKS 172072 06/08/88 100.30 CHAPIN PUBLISHING CO AD LEGAL 10- 4210 - 140 -14 100.30 » 172073 06/08/88 135.10 CITY BEER COST GOODS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172073 06/08/88 112.65 CITY BEER COST GOODS SO- 4630-842 -84 172073 06/08/88 178.20 CITY BEER COST GOODS 50- 4630- 862 -86 42^5.95 « - -- -- — �aair•e **4-CKS 172075 06/07/88 9.90 CLANCY DRUG INC PHOTO 10- 4504 - 200 -20 1894 172075 06 /07/88 2.82- CLANCY DRUG INC CREDIT 10 -4508- 480 -48 172075 00/07/88 3.59 CLANCY DRUG INC SUPPLIES - _ -10- 4510-260 -26 1892 10.6T a W 41a*: is lr - - - « «« -CKS 172078 06/09/88 196.00 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST GOODS SOSLD 26- 4624 - 682 -68 172078 06/15/88 615.75 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST OF GS -" - "27 -4624- 663 -66 172078 06/08/88 444.70 COCA COLA BOTTLING COST GOODS 50-4632 - 822 -82 172078 06/10/88 946.60 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTOROY 50- 4632-842-84 2,203.05 a aaaaaa a3a -CKS 172080 06/15/88 283.50 CONT -MINN GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504-663 -66 172080 06/15/86 158.96 CONT -MINN CLEANING SUPPLIES 27-4512- 663-66 172080 06/15/88 8,672.52 CONT -MINN BLACKTOP 2T -4524- 663 -66 3,114.98 a aaaa:K:« - - - aaa-CKS 172087 06/07/88 58.06 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 480 -48 172087 06/07/88 107.61 CURTIN MATH SCI GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 480 -48 165.67 « aa:ra +a aaa-CKS 172091 06/15/88 128.70 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 10- 4258- 440 -44 1722091 06/15/88 39.35 CITY OF EDINA SEWER Q WATER 10 -4258- 646 -64 172091 06/15/88 27.76 CITY OF EDINA SEWER 6 WATER 10 -4258- 646-64 195.81 � aa:ea:ea aaa -CKS "1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 4 CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. N MESSAGE 172101 06/07/88 488.15 CHEMSEARCH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 642 -64 488.1S • ++ -CKS 172110 06/08/88 205.05 DAVIDSEN DIST INC COST GOODS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 205.05 s s•» -CKS 172125 06/08/88 329.25 MERIT SUPPLY - GEN SUP - 10 -4504- 624 -62 172125 06/10/88 471.50 MERIT SUPPLY SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 645 -64 172125 06/07/88 226.50 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 1,027.25 r - s«w -CKS 172134 06/08/88 36.75 CITY WIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50 -4248- 841 -84 172134 06/08/88 36.75 CITY WIDE SERVICES CONT REPAIRS 50- 4248-841-84 172134 05/08/88 36.75 CITY WIDE 5ERVICE5 CONT REPAIRS - - 50 -4248- 841 -84 110.25 172135 06/14/88 4.29- EAGLE WINE CASH DIS -" - 50- 3710 - 003 -00 78398 ITE135 06/09/88 2.62- EAGLE WINE CASH DISC 50 -3710- 003-00 1TE135 06/14/88 SS.28 EAGLE WINE COST GS 50- 4632-822-82 TT695 172135 06/09/88 47.14 EAGLE WINE COST GOODS SOLD 50-4632- 822 -82 172135 06/09/88 46.75 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD 50 -4632- 842 -84 172135 06/14/88 24.94 EAGLE WINE COST OF GS 50-4632- 842-84 T8399 172135 06/09/88 130.7T EAGLE WINE - - - COST GOODS SOLD -- - 50 -4632- 862 -86 172135 06/14/88 214.35 EAGLE WINE COST G5 SO-4632- 862-86 T8398 512.32 K 172136 06/09/88 122.44 EARL F ANDERSON SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 647 -64 122.44 s *s -CKS 172138 06/14/88 35.50 ED PHILLIPS d SONS COST GS - 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172133 06/14/88 12.87 ED PHILLIPS d SONS COST GS 50-4632- 842 -84 078820 48.37 R - Ms�a - � «« -CKS 172146 06/14/88 261.16 GREEN ACRES SPKL PROF SERV 10 -4201- 643 -64 261.16 «s« -CKS 172156 06/07/88 50.76 FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL PRO SERV 10 -4201- 420 -42 172156 05/15/88 45.76 FAIRVIEW H05PITAL PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 420 -42 96.52 _ - -- - — FANS -CKS 172158 06/14/88 404.40 FEED RITE CONTROL MACH EQUIP 26- 1340 - 000 -00 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 5 ` CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. N MESSAGE ' 172158 06/14/88 35.00 FEED RITE CONTROL PROF SERV 26- 4201 - 682 -68 439.40 4: * ** -CKS 172188 06/08/88 41.62 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 172188 06/09/88 399.00 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO MACH EQUIP 26- 1340 - 000 -00 172188 06/08/86 308.08 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540 - 841 -84 748.70 « **rx* v**-CKS 172199 06/08/88 90.12 G T PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 172199 06/08/88 98.04 G T PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 188.16 *=e xx* * ** -CKS 172206 06/13/88 502.37 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 172206 08/13/88 122.06 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 301 -30 ITL206 06/13/88 257.95 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10-4262- 560 -56 ITEE06 06/13/88 58.30 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 560 -56 ITEE06 06/13/88 44.28 G b K SERVICES LAUNDDRY 10-4262 - 846 -84 1T2Z06 06/13/68 177.12 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY - - 10-4262- 646-64 172206 08/13/88 45.60 G b K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 1TEE06 06/13/88 178.00 G b K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 10- 4512 - 540 -54 172206 06/13/88 61.08 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRY 28-4262- T02 -TO 172206 06/13/88 330.60 G b K SERVICES LAUNDDRY 40- 4262 - 801-80 1TE208 06!13/88 68.05 G b K SERVICES LAUNDRT 40-4282-801-80 1,845.41 * * *4, ** * ** -CKS 172214 06/07/88 92.31 TOLL COMPANY SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 92.31 * * * * ** ** *-CKS 172222 06/10/88 83.50 HEDBERG d SONS CO GEN SUPPLIES -" 10 -4504- 345 -30 172222 06/10/88 18.20 HEDBERG b SONS CO GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 646 -64 172222 06 /10/88 10.00 HEDBERG b SONS CO GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 662 -66 111.70 -- * * *x ** * ** -CKS 172228 06/13/88 2,604.30 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 172228 06/13/88 28.22 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560-56 172228 06/13/88 65.79 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS - -- 10- 4620 - 560 -56 172228 06/13/88 127.68 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 **w.-CKS 172245 06/07/86 36.00 ROBERT B HILL SUPPLIES - -" 10- 4504 - 440 -44 36.00 `� ^' - R, - 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK. REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 6 t CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 1 r. 172249 06/13/88 100.00 WM HOFFMAN POLICE SERV 10 -4100- 430 -42 100.00 + ss« -CKS 172256 06/15%88 -- -- - " - - - -- -62.06 -- -- ICSI - -- - -- ---- - - - - -- EQUIP MAINT--- _. - -.— 10 -4274= 420 -42 - n_ 62.06 ; - -- - - - -- ----------- ------ - - - - -- — - - -- � « « « « «« « «« -CKS ; py " 172258 06/14/88 52.05 INDUSTRIAL GASKET CO REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 804 -80 s «« «-CKS -� �j. 172267 06/13/88 2,400.00- IBM CORPORATION CORRECTION 10- 4288-510-51 172267 08/13/88 214.00 IBM CORPORATION SERV CONT 10- 4288-510-51 " 172267 06/13/88 2,140.00 IBM CORPORATION SERV CONT 10-4288 - 510 -51 '. 1T226T 06/13/88 2,400.00 IBM CORPORATION CORRECTION 10-4288 - 510 -51 172287 08/13/88 2,140.00- IBM CORPORATION CORRECTION 10-4288-510 -51 -- - - -- — — E14.00 _ « « « « «« ««« -CKS 172277 06/09/88 286.35 CARLSON PRINTING REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 286.35 a 172278 06/14/88 35.91 JERRYS FOODS GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 100-10 IT?-?-T8 06/07/88 22. T7 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 1T22T8 06/10188 8.10 JERRYS FOODS SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 1T22T8 06/09/88 11.04 JERRYS FOODS COST GOODS SOLD 23-4624 - 613-61 T7.82 « « « »f «» ss «-CKS 172286 06/14/68 - - -- — - - -- 44. 46 JUSTUS- LUMBER REPAIR PARTS--- - - - -30 -4540- 782 -78 • 44.48 « - -- ------- - - - - -- - « «» -CKS 172289 06/13/88 100.00 WALTER JOHNSON SERVICE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 « - - - -- - - - - -- — -- -- 172292 06/15/88 10,600.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO INSURANCE 10 -4260- 510 -51 10,600.00 « «ss-CKS - 172294- - - - - -- 06708/88 -- 39.25 CRESCENT -- ELECTRIC REPAIR -PARTS -- �' ,1 I. - R, - 1988 CITY OF EDINA 06 -20 -88 PAGE 7 CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. * P.O. # MESSAGE * *wr «« * ** -CKS 172300 06/14/88 289.85 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 621 -62 172300 06/13/88 677.34 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504 - 621 -62 172300 06/14/88 985.00 KOKESH ATHLETIC GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 647 -64 1,95 —c.19 � + + + ++ *** —CKS 172302 06/08/88 3,549.55 KUETHER DIST CO COST GOODS 50- 4630- 822 -82 172302 06/08/88 5,608.53 KUETHER DIST CO COST GOODS —" — - 50- 4630 - 842 -84 9,158.08 »r «n «* a* »-CKS 172304 06/14/88 142.41 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 172304 06/08/88 100.32 KNOX LUMBER CO LUMBER -" - -" - 10- 4604 - 646 -64 172304 06/10/88 44.31 KNOX LUMBER CO SUPPLIES 28-4504-682-68 172304 06/15/88 72.62 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- T02 -70 172304 06/13/88 52.39 KNOX LUMBER CO SUPPLIES 28-4SO4- T02-TO 172304 06/15/88 43.15 KNOX LUMBER CO GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504- TO2 -TO 455.20 414t * 44 * *x -CKS 172311 06/08/88 3,538.05 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE COST GOODS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172311 06/08/88 7,295.05 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE COST GOODS 50 -4630- 842 -84 ` 172311 06/08/88 7,843.60 EASTSIDE BEVERAGE INVENTORY---- - - - - -" - 50-4630- 862 -86 18,676.70 :9 414 ** *—CKS 172317 06/10/88 565.05 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 172317 061110/88 T48.TO LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540- 803-80 1,313.75 * 172318 06/08/88 11.40 LEEF BROS INC LAUNDRY _ 27 -4262- 664 -66 11.40 * 172319 06/09/88 2,739.00 LEITNER COMPANY - SOD BLACK DIRT - - 27 -4562- 664 -66 2,739.00 * * ** -CKS 172323 06/07/88 5.25 LINHOFF PHOTO SPLY 10- 4508 - 440 -44 172323 06/14/88 - 33.40 LINHOFF PHOTO SUPPLIES 10 -4508- 440 -44 38.65 » * ** -CKS 172325 06/10/88 4,589.26 LONG LAKE FORD TRACT MACH EQUIP 27 -1340- 000 -00 - --4,S89.26 * +' *e ° *r• *t.*-CKS ;tic. �,�.� +; ., •.r. r;Q:!�'� .J 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. 11 MESSAGE 172344 06/13/88 97.30 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP FPROV MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 172344 06/13/88 53.10 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP PREV MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 172344 06 /13/88 97.30- MED OXYGEN & EQUIP CORRECTION 10- 4274- 440 -44 172344 06/13/88 97.20 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP PREV MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 172344 06/13/88 23.25 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP PREV MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 172344 06/13/88 36.21 MED OXYGEN & EQUIP 1ST AID SUPPLIE 10- 4510 - 440 -44 209.76 * 4:4 4:4 4 4: r**-CKS 172346 06/09/88 7,078.50 MET N WASTE C L COMM PERMITS 10- 3095- 000 -00 7,078.50 * 4* *44!4: *:*s-CKS 172351 06/08/88 1,816.08 MILSCO ENGINEERING PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 647 -64 1T2351 06/08/88 838.08 MILSCO ENGINEERING REPAIR PARTS - 10- 4540-390 -30 2,654.16 172359 06 /07/88 9.00- MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664-66 172359 06/08/88 201.20 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS -_ 27- 4540- 664 -66 172359 06/07/88 176.52 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTTS 27- 4540- 664 -66 172359 06/07/88 48.41 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 27-4540- 664 -66 172359 06/08/88 105.93 MINN TORO INC REPAIR PARTS 2T- 4540-664 -66 523.06 4 r *rrr - - - - - - -- - - -. -- - - - _. -- -- - - - -- - - ** *-CKS 172363 06/07/88 51.25 MONARCH MARKING OFFICE SUPPLIES 50- 4516 - 860 -86 51.25 r4 *44:4: ** *-CKS 172365 06/13/88 100.00 BURT MERFELD SERVCIE 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 172366 06/08/88 323.78 MINNESOTA BAR COST GOODS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 172366 06/10/88 218.06 MINNESOTA BAR INVENTOROY 50-4632- 842 -84 172366 06/08/88 223.68 MINNESOTA BAR COST GOODS 50 -463E- 862-86 T65.S2 r« «rrt * ** -CKS 172378 06/14/88 9,039.10 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172378 06/10/88 12,268.70 MARK VII SALES INVENTOROY 50- 4630- 842 -84 172378 06/13/88 15,158.60 MARK VII SALES PROF SERV 50-463E-86E-86 36,466.40 172379 06/09/88 30.00 METRO FONE COMM SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 184 -18 30.00 172380 06/08/88 11,813.60 THOMSEN NYBECK PROF PROS 10 -4201- 220 -22 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK. NO. DATE 172391 M' *4: 4.r* 172389 172389 172389 * ** *** 172415 172416 172416 17E416 172417 172420 **** ** 172424 * * :e * ** 172429 172429 17'2429 172429 rra *r* 172433 172434 172435 172435 r *f :r rr 06/08/88 06/08/88 06/08/88 06/08/88 06/07/88 06/07/88 06/07/88 06/13/88 06/14/88 06/15/88 06/08/88 06/15/88 06/10/88 06/10/88 06/13/88 06/07/88 24.00 CHECK REGISTER PAUSTIC d SONS COST 06-20 -88 PAGE 9 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 11 MESSAGE 11,813.60 * 06/07/88 39.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 167.7 MAINT STAR TRIBUNE ADV PERSONEL 10 -4212- 510 -51 r 167.72 * 06/14/88 37.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST GS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 * ** —CKS 288.50 NORTHSTAR ICE COST GOODS 50 -4632- 822 -82 50- 4632- 842 -84 507.00 — 193.79 NORTHSTAR ICE COST GOODS 50- 4632 - 842 -84 428.00 NORTHSTAR ICE COST GOODS 50- 4632 - 862 -86 1,223.50 * * ** —CKS 99.18 MED CENTER HEALTH REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 99.18 45.50 OFFICE PRODUCTS DATA PROC OTH 10 -4233- 560 -56 482.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS SERV CONT EQ 10- 4288 - 510 -51 77.00 OFFICE PRODUCTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504-440 -44 604.50 1,275.35 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420-42 1;275.35 *v*-CKS 236.79 OLD DUTCH FOODS COST OF GS 27 -4624- 663 -66 236.79 * ** *-CKS 630.70 OLD DOMINION BRUSH REPAIR PARTS -10- 4540 - 560 -56 630.70 * -- -- -- - - - - * ** -CKS 864.75 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING COST OF GS 27- 4624- 663 -66 24T.50 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTOROY 50- 4632-822 -82 S84.30 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORYO 50 -4632- 842 -84 350.20 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632- 862 -86 2,046.75 * -- - - - - - 06/07/88 24.00 PAUSTIC d SONS COST GOODS SOLD 50 -4632- 822 -82 24.00 06/07/88 39.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC EQUIP MAINT 28- 4274 - 704 -70 39.00 r 06/14/88 37.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST GS 50- 4632 - 822 -82 06/09/88 156.60 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST GOODDS SOLD 50- 4632- 842 -84 — 193.79 7 * ** -CKS *** -CKS •1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 10 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 172448 06/09/88 280.00 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10-4600- 628 -62 280.00 - - *4v-CKS 172462 06/09/88 75.80 RENTAL EQUIP Q SALES SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 644 -64 75.80 * ** -CKS 172464 06/13/88 100.85 ROAD RESCUE SUPPLIES - 10- 4504- 440 -44 100.85 « * ** -CKS 172490 06/09/88 103.33 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26- 4544- 682 -68 1TE490 06/09/8$ 28.50 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26- 4544-682 -68 172490 06 /09/8$ 31.45 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26- 4544 - 682 -8$ 1TE490 06 /09 /r,$ 53.61 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26-4544-6$2-68 172490 06/.09/88 TO.14 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26- 4544-682 -68 172490 06/09/88 27.98 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 26-4544- 68E -68 iTE490 06 /0T /88 87.50 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT 28-4544-702 -TO - ** *-CKS 172493 06/08/88 4,139.25 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC COST GOODS 50- 4630 - 822 -82 172493 06/08/88 8,950.65 SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC COST GOODS 50- 4630 - 842 -84 1T'L'493 06/08/88 229.45 - - SOUTHSIDE"DIST COINC COST GOODS - - -- - 50- 4630- 862 -86 13,319.35 « * *z -CY.S 172500 06/13/88 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 x _ 172501 06/14/88 110.00 SAYLORS SOFTWARE 18T GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 510 -51 110.00 * ** -CKS 172503 06/07/88 16.83 SUBURBAN PLUMS SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -52 172503 06/07/88 112.69 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-520 -52 129.5c^ * 172504 06/07/88 41.48 SYSTEM SUPPLY DAT PROC 0TH 10 -4233- 560 -56 41.48 « «« -CKS T 172508 06/10/88 11.72 ST PAUL BOOK SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 172508 06 /10/88 4.86 ST PAUL BOOK SUPPLIES 10-4504- 440 -44 172508 06/14/88 1.60 ST PAUL BOOK GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 18.18 �r Y'� 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK. REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. K MESSAGE « « « —CY.S 172516 06/14/88 187.84 SEARS ROEBUCK VACUME 10- 4901 - 440 -44 187.84 » « «« —CKS 172526 06/08/88 3,992.40 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 3,97E.40 « 172527 06/08/88 48.31 TAYLOR SALES GEN SPLY - 26- 4504 - 683 -68 48.31 « »rorr,x » »» -CKS 172537 06/07/88 482.59 TRI STATE PUMP MACH Q ESQUIP 26 -1340- 000 -00 172539 06/10/88 326.50 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER 27- 4558 - 664 -66 172539 06/10/88 131.40 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER 30-4558 - 782 -78 457.90 « _- » »rerx » »» -CKS 172541 06/09/88 59.94 TARGET CABLE 10 -2148- 000 -00 172541 06/09/88 54.94 TARGET CABLE 10- 2148-000 -00 172541 061,09/88 59.94- TARGET CABLE - -- - - -10- 2148- 000 -00 54.94 « 172542 06/08/88 13,056.30 THORPE DIST COST GOODS 50- 4630 - 862 -86 13,056.30 172543 06/08/88 - 55.85 TWIN CITY ELEVATOR CONT REPRAIRS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 55.85 » »» -CKS 172545 06/08/88 6,476.00 TWIN CTY GARAGE DOOR REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 6,476.00 » - » »» -CKS 172551 06/15/88 1,659.39 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266- 420 -42 172551 06/15/88 105.25 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266-430 -42 172551 06/15/88 _ 538.00 UNIFORM UNLIMITED GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 420 -42 172551 06/08/88 5.70 UNIFORM UNLIMITED UNIFORNM 30- 4504 - 781 -78 2,308.34 =* » »a -CKS 172553 06/10/88 295.74 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 801 -80 295.74 :* VT .. . yr 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 8 MESSAGE w*4lv:e:, **:s—CKS 172563 06/07/88 439.15 VERSATILE VEHICEL REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 665 -66 439.15 r 172SG4 06/07/88 14.25 VAUGHNS CABLE TV 10- 2149-000 -00 14.25 w rrre:»W. 4:*4 —CKS 172569 06/07/88 165.41 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL GASOLJINE 28- 4612 - 704 -70 165.41 w 172570 06/15/88 492.00 VANTAGE ELECTRIC PROF SERV 27 -4201- 662 -66 492.00 ww; —CKS 172582 06/10/98 572.62 GORDON SMITH CO GAS 27- 4612 - 664 -66 572.62 3srw:Rw V +w—CKS 1722586 06/10/88 137.43 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 520 -52 iTt586 001,10!88 53.85 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 550 -56 172586 06 /OT /88 11.63 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40-4540- 804 -80 1T2586 06108/88 160.43 W W GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 50- 4540- 841-84 363.34 wrraww a *s —CKS 172590 06/13/88 100.00 HENRY WROBLESKI POLICE SERV 10- 4100 - 430 -42 100.00 ww a ee� *** —CKS 172597 06/08/88 48.15 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIP 26 -4642- 681 -68 48.15 *:rww:t swa —CKS 172612 06/14/88 5,839.98 MIDWEST ASPHALT CDR BLACKTOP 10- 4524 - 314 -30 172612 06/08/88 8,727.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT CDR BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 314 -30 172612 06/08/88 8,736.19 MIDWEST ASPHALT CDR BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 314 -30 1TEG12 OG /08/88 130.94 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR BLACKTOP 40- 4524- 803 -80 23,435.05 w + »w —CKS 172701 06/07/88 133.56 JAMES ADAMS REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 133.56 172702 06/07/88 69.66 BARBARA PETERSON MILEAGE 30- 4208 - 781 -78 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE 172703 06/07/88 25.00 D C HEY SERV CONTRACTS 30- 4280 - 781 -78 as. 00 y: 172704 06/07/38 81.75 DANS REGISTER SERV PROF SERV 26- 4201 - 682 -68 81.75 172705 06/07/88 82.50 GRAPHICS PLUS SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 8c.50 + 172706 06/07/88 36.57 B R BENSON LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 17L'70G 00/07/88 41.95 8 R BENSON LAUNDRY - - - -- 10- 4262 - 301 -30 ' 172706 08/07 /88 32.33 B R BENSON LAUNDRY 10- 4262-301 -30 110.85 172707 06/10/88 36.70 FRANK J ZAMBONI SUPPLIES 30-4504 - 782 -78 172707 0G /07 /88 106.00 FRANK J ZAMBONI SUPPLIES 30-4504- T82-78 142.70 x 172708 06/07/88 286.20 LEFFLER PRINTING OFF SUPPLIE 30- 4516 - 781 -78 286.20 172709 06/07/88 5,386.84 HENNEPIN CTY TREAS BOARD ROOM 10- 4286 - 220 -22 5,386.84 172710 06/07/88 145.00 QUALITIY REG CONT MAINT 27- 4200- 663 -66 145.00 » 172711 06/07/88 18.45 FLOWERS OF EDINA DUES 6 SUB 27- 4204 - 661 -66 -- 172712 06 /07/88 800.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS PRO SERV 10- 4201 - 420 -42 172712 00/07 /88 975.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS PRO SERV 10 -4201- 420-42 1,775.00 * 172713 06/07/88 370.10 - WEST PHOTO" PHOTO SUP 10- 4508- 420-42 370.10 * 172714 06/07/88 55.80 NATL CAMERA EXCHANGE PHOTO SPLY 10- 4508 - 420 -42 172714 06/07/88 67.96 NATL CAMERA EXCHANGE 1ST AID SPLY 10- 4510- 420 -42 123.76 172715 06/07/88 74.85 STREICHERS GEN SUP 10 -4504- 420 -42 172715 06/10/88 969.65 STREICHERS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 172715 06 /07/88 80.00 STREICHERS AMMUN 10 -4572- 420 -42 172715 06/07/88 1,315.23 STREICHERS REPLACE 10 -4901- 420 -42 172715 06/07/88 63.75 STREICHERS REPLAC 10- 4901 - 420 -42 2,503.48 « 172716 06/07/88 297.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 172716 06 /OT /e8 188.00 OFFSET PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 420 -42 485.00 * 172717 06/07/88 40.50 US WEST SER CONTRACTS 30 -4280- 781 -78 40.50 * 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 4 P.O. # MESSAGE 172718 06/15/88 68.40 MOTOROLA INC EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 420 -42 172718 06/07/88 7.50 MOTOROLA INC EQUIP 10- 4274- 420 -42 172718 06/07/88 139.62 MOTOROLA INC EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 215.52 172719 06/07/88 255.20 VIDEO MIDWEST CABLE TV 10- 2149- 000 -00 255.20 172720 06/07/88 224.95 TANDY CONSUMER SERV GEN SPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 24.9S 172721 06/07/58 520.59 MOBILE CELLULAR EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 172721 06/07/88 625.00 MOBILE CELLULAR REPLACEMENT 10- 4901 - 470 -47 1,145.59 172722 06/07/88 82.71 SHERIFF DEPT HENN EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 420 -42 172722 06/07/88 158.61 SHERIFF DEPT HENN BOARD A ROOM "10 -4286- 220 -22 241.32 172723 06/07/88 425.00 J MICHAELS LUMBER 27- 4604 - 662 -66 42'5. 00 172724 06/10/88 373.93 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 10 -4201- 160 -16 172724 06/07/88 441.79 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 10- 4201- 160 -16 17ZT24 06/10/88 554.40 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 40-4201- 800-80 172724 06/07/88 407.14 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 40- 4201 - 800-80 172724 06/07/88 73.15 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 50-4201- 820 -82 172724 06/10/88 63.04 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 50-4201-820 -82 172T24 06/10/88 63.05 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV - 50- 4201 - 840-84 172724 06 /07/88 73.15 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 50 -4201- 840-84 172724 06/10/88 63.04 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV 50-4201- 860 -86 172724 OG /07/88 73.15 ACCOUNTEMPS PROF SERV - 50-4201 - 860 -86 2,185.84 172725 06/07/88 63.04 INMAC SUPPLIES 10- 4504-440 -44 63.04 17 ^2726 06/07/88 145.60 D Q V SALES GEN SPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 145.60 « 172727 06 /07/88 57.56 NORTHERN WATER TREAT SAFETY EQUIP 26- 4642 - 681 -68 57,56 172728 06/07/88 426.45 RED WING SHOES LAUNDDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 172728 06/07/88 178.40 RED WING SHOES LAUNDDRY 10 -4262- 560-56 172728 06/07/88 528.40 RED WING SHOES LAUNDDRT 10 -4262- 646-64 1T ^2728 06/07/88 283.50 RED WING SHOES LAUNDDRY 40 -4262- 801 -80 1,416.75 172729 06/14/88 80.00 LOLA EDMAN PROF SERV 27- 4201 - 662 -66 172729 06!07/88 80.00 LOLA EDMAN PROF SERVICE 2T-4E01- 662 -66 160.00 172730 06/07/88 27.20 PLUNKETTS INC GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 .„ ... .. 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK. NO. DATE CHECK. REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 15 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. # MESSAGE *C* -CKS * « «# -CKS 27.20 * 172731 06/08/88 4,749.00 CLEAN FLO LAB SERVICES 10- 4242- 35$ -30 4,749.00 * 172732 06/07/88 5;118.74 - VIKING PRESS PRINTING 10 -4600- 500 -50 5,118.74 * 172733 06/07/88 23.00 TAYSTEE BAKING CO COST OF COMM 26 -4624- 683 -68 23.00 * 172734 06/07/88 15.00 PROJECT IMPACT TRAINING FEE 10- 4202 - 420 -42 15.00 172735 06/07/88 24.65 KRIS EIDEN MILEAGE 10 -4208- 420 -42 24.G5 * 172736 06/07/88 20.00 FBI NAA DUES 10- 4204 - 420 -42 c'0.00 172737 06/07/88 304.75 JULES HERMAN CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 304.75 * 172740 06/07/88 119.05 PLASTIC BAGMART GEN SPLY 10-4504- 507 -50 119.05 17ET41 06/07/88 321.54 CON WAY CENTRAL EXP EQUIPMENT 25-4942- 001-23 321.54 172T42 06/07/88 465.06 Pro Instant Print PRINTING 30- 4600 - 781 -78 465.06 172743 06/07/88 720.00 MN a SUB SEWER WATER CONT REPAIRS 40- 4248 - 803 -80 720.00 >K 172744 06/07/88 38.57 BENSON LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 172744 06/07/88 12.67 BENSON LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 172744 06/14/88 83.78 BENSON LAUNDRY 10- 4262- 301 -30 172744 06/07/88 32.33 BENSON LAUNDRY- 10- 4262 - 646 -64 172744 06/07/88 50.95 BENSON LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 646 -64 218.30 ► 172746 06/14/88 365.74 JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 30- 4564 - 783 -78 172746 06/08/88 12.72 JACOBSON SUPPLY WATER TREATMENT 30 -4564- 783 -78 172746 06/08/88 333.01 JACOBSON SUPPLY WATER TREATMENT 30- 4564 - 783 -78 711.47 172747 06/08/88 22.22 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL ADS 10 -4210- 140 -14 172747 06/08/88 18.09 MN SUBURBAN NEWS AD LEGAL - 10 -4210- 140 -14 172747 06/08/88 21.72 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL ADS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 77 *C* -CKS * « «# -CKS 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 16 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 172747 06/08/88 15.90 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL ADS 10- 4210 - 140 -14 172747 06/08/88 36.91 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL ADS 10 -4210- 140 -14 172747 06/08/88 !''?.22 MN SUBURBAN NEWS LEGAL ADS 10- 4210 -140-14 137.06 * 172748 06/08/88 11.83 DEPENDABLE COURIER ADV PERSONNEL 10 -4212- 510 -51 11.83 * 172749 06/08/88 140.00 INTL CONF OF BLDG DUES SUSS 10- 4204- 490 -49 140.00 172750 06/10/88 119.10 NEBCO COST OF GS -- 26 -4624- 683 -68 172750 06/08/88 276.82 NEBCO COST OF COMM 26- 4624 - 683 -68 395.92 172751 06/14/88 5.50 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 683 -68 172751 OG/08/88 8.50 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN COST COMM 26-4624 - 683 -68 172751 06/09/88 490.T8 TROPICAL SNOW OF MN COST GOODS SOLD 26-4624-683-68 504.78 172752 06/08/88 54.84 CITIY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 10-4252- 345 -30 54.84 172753 06/08/88 549.75 GREEN TOUCH CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 643 -64 549.75 * 172754 06/08/88 708.53 SIMPLEX TIME REC REPLACEMENT 10- 4901- 540 -54 708.53 * 172755 06/08/89 1,360.18 MIKE ALM REPAIRS 40 -4248- 803 -80 1,360.18 172756 06/08/88 513,862.50 FIRST TRUST DUE HRA 10- 1145 - 000 -00 17ET56 06/98/8$ 46,062.50 FIRST TRUST INT BONDS 2T- 4300 - 661 -66 172TS6 06/08/88 120,675.00 FIRST TRUST UNAPP SURP 66- 2490-000-00 680,600.00 172757 06/08/88 426.85 TOOLS BY OLSON GEN SUP 27 -4SO4- 664 -66 426.85 * 172758 06/08/88 100.44 THE MATHISON CO COST GOODS SOLD 23 -4624- 613 -61 100.44 * 172759 06/08/88 40.23 MUZAK ADV OTHER SO- 4214 - 822 -82 172!759 06/08/88 40.23 MUZAK ADV OTHER 50-4214-862-86 80.46 * 172760 06/08/88 50.00 PUBLILICITY CENTRAL ADVERTISING" 30- 4214 - 781 -78 50.00 x 172761 06/09/88 75.00 TOM BURNS BLDG IMP 25 -4984- 520 -52 75.00 172762 06/09/88 420.00 NERMFLEX INC ACCTS PAY 10- 2010 - 000 -00 420.00 1989 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 172763 06/09/88 172764 06/09/88 s!Ir It: sra: WAYNE COURTNEY 172767 06/09/88 172768 06/09/88 172769 06/08/88 1727G9 06 /08/88 172769 06 /08/88 1TP769 06/08/88 172770 06/09/88 172771 06/09/88 17E772 06/09/88 172773 06/09/88 172774 06/09/88 172775 06/09/88 172776 06/09/88 172776 06/09/88 172776 06/09/88 172777 06/09/88 172778 06/09/88 172779 06/09/88 172780 06/09/88 r i CHECK. REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 17 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. B MESSAGE 41.40 WAYNE COURTNEY MILEAGE 10 -4208- 100 -10 41.40 142.00 SMITH HEAT 3 AIR REFUND 10- 3125 - 000 -00 142.00 e * * * -CKS 188.00 RICHARD PETERSON REFUND 10 -3180- 000 -00 188.00 1,903.71 AAA LIC 6 REPAIR 10 -4310- 560 -56 1,903.71 4.50 JOYCE REYA MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 6.89 JOYCE REYA PROPANE GAS 10- 4504- 314-30 16.19 JOYCE REYA SUPP -- 10- 4504-460 -46 3.90 JOYCE RETA SUPP 10- 4540- 330 -30 31.48 256.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL PROF SERV 30 -4201- 781 -78 256.00 25.00 NICHOLAS LEGEROS PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 25.00 25.00 MARIAN ALSTAD PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 25.00 50.00 BILL DIETRICHSON PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 50.00 25.00 BOB CONNALLY PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 Es. 00 * 25.00 MICHAEL GATLIN PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 25.00 * 85.00 JUDY LIEBER PROF SERV 30 -4201- 781 -78 110.00 JUDY LIEBER PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 110.00- JUDY LIEBER CORRECTIOOOOOOOON 30 -4201- 781 -78 85.00 * 30.00 RAY GORMLEY PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30.00 * 30.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON PROF SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30.00 * 100.00 BACHMANS ART EDINBOROUGH 30- 4201 - 781 -78 100.00 * 155.00 ESS BROS REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 345 -30 155.00 * r i Il 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 18 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 11 P.O. 8 MESSAGE 172781 06/OS/88 366.68 MAGNUSON SOD SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 803 -80 366.68 172782 06/08/88 125.76 TWIN CITY HOME JUICE COST GOODS SOLD 50- 4632 - 862 -86 125.76 v 172733 06/08/88 660.00 VL SERV LIGHTING GEN SUP 10- 4504 - 322 -30 660.00 v 172784 06/10/88 254.00 BRANDOW HOWARD INC INSURANCE 10- 4260 - 510 -51 2S4.00 + - 172785 06/08/88 565.00 JERRY PRINTING PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 508 -50 565.00 172786 06/08/88 700.00 BELLAND GOLF C8 CONS CONT REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 700.00 172787 06/09/88 2,194.19 STATE TREASURER PERMITS 10-3095- 000 -00 172787 06/04/88 14E.50 STATE TREASURER SURTAX 10- 3113 - 000 -00 2,336.69 172788 06/09/88 250.00 WITZEL TREE MOVING PLANTING 6 TREES 10- 4560 - 644 -64 250.00 172789 06/09/88 75.00 DEE DEE HENSEL CONT SERV 30- 4201- 781 -78 75.00 172790 06/09/88 50.00 CAROL GILKEY - CONT SERV - " "" 30- 4201 - 781 -78 50.00 172791 06/09/88 200.00 BRNSVL COMM ORCH CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781-78 200.00 172792 06/09/88 25.00 RENEE PETERSON. CONT SERV 30 -4201- 781 -78 25.00 172793 06/09/88 25.00 RON TAP,RO CONT SERV 30- 4201- 781 -78 25.00 172794 06/09/88 40.00 KATE CURRY CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 40.00 172795 06/09/88 40.00 CAROL JENSEN CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 40.00 » 172796 06/09/88 50.00 EMMET STARK CONT SERV 30- 4201 - 781 -78 50.00 * 172797 06/09/88 80.00 ROXANNE SEIDEL CONT SERV 30 -4201- 781 -78 80.00 4 172798 06/09/88 95.63 FRANCIS CALLAHAN MILEAGE 10- 4208- 480 -48 9S.63 v 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 19 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. M MES'S'AGE 172799 06/09/88 76.05 DEPT OF PROP TAX POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 140 -14 76.05 * 172800 06/09/88 84.00 SSEC OF FISH METRO PERMITS 10- 4310 - 358 -30 84.00 x 172801 06/09/88 31.43 ACRO MN INC SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 31.43 * iTE802 06/09/88 498.00 HILLS COURT LAUNDRY 26- 4262- 682 -68 498.00 * 172803 06/09/88 400.00 LANDSSCAPE d TRUF WEED SPRAY 10- 4566- 643 -64 400.00 * 172804 06/09/88 16.80 MN WANNER CO SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 644 -64 16.80 * 172805 OG/09/88 44.85 CUSTOM POOLS SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 44.85 * F *« -CKS 172307 06/09/88 23.28 CULLIGAN CONT SERV 10 -4200- 482 -48 23.28 * 172808 06/09/88 568.25 EDINBOROUGH CORP PROF SERV 10- 4201-627 -62 568.25 + 172809 06/10/88 619.26 MCQUEEN EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 619.26 172810 06/10/88 1,033.55 BJORKS COUNTRY STONE CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 302 -30 1931 172810 06/10/88 1,533.00 BJORKS COUNTRY STONE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248- 302 -30 1933 172810 06/10/88 1,585.50 BJORKS COUNTRY STONE CONT REPAIRS 10- 4248-302 -30 2086 172810 06/10/88 380.75 SJORKS COUNTRY STONE CONT REPAIRS 10-4248- 302 -30 1352 4,532.80 * 172811 06/10/88 35.14 DURO TEST CORP SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 35.14 * 172812 06/10/88 2,083.49 STRGAR ROSCOE FAUSCH PROF SER 10 -4201- 500 -50 2,083.49 * 172813 06 /10/88 353.99 MARLIN INDUS DIV TRAINING AIDS 10- 4608 - 281 -28 353.99 * 172814 06/10/88 700.00 GOVT TRAINING SERV PROF SERV 10 -4201- 100 -10 700.00 * 172815 06/13/88 1,990.00 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 540 -54 172815 06/10/88 883.33 RIEKE CARROLL MULLER PROF SERV 40- 4201-800 -80 2,873.33 s o✓ 19SS CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 20 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 172816 06/10/88 4,596.95 AEC PROF SERV 40- 4201 - 800-80 4,596.95 :R 172817 06/10/88 112.19 ARLEN KITSIS DAMAGES 10- 4504 - 318 -30 112.19 * - 172818 06/10/88 1122.00 RADIO INSTALLS EQUIP RENAL 10 -4226- 440 -44 112.00 172,919 06/10/88 410.00 GARTNER REFRIG CONT REPAIRS 28 -4248- 704 -70 410.00 172820 06/10/88 13.30 QUICK PRINT PRINTING 28 -4600- 701 -70 13.30 172821 06/10/88 30.36 GUSTAVE A LARSON REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 30.36 17282c' 06/10/88 125.00 PADGETT THOMPSON REGISTRATION 10-420E- 440 -44 125.00 172823 06/10/88 327.94 MESSERLI 6 KRAMER AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 1728Z3 06/10/88 45.00 MESSERLI 6 KRAMER AMBULANE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 372.94 a 172824 06/10/88 92.84 NATL SCREENPRINT UNIFORM ALLOW 10- 4266 - 440 -44 92.84 172825 06/10/88 3,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE - "" 10- 4290 - 510 -51 3,000.00 172'8 ^26 06/10/88 250.00 OUR OF ATF PROF SERV 50- 4201 - 82222 -82 17282G 06/10!88 250.00 BUR OF ATF PROF SERV 50- 4201-840-84 iTE826 06/10/88 250.00 BUR OF ATF PROF 5ERV 50-4201 - 860-88 750.00 _ 172827 06/10/88 500.00 PEAK CONST CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 646 -64 172827 06/10/38 4,900.00 PEAK CONST CONT REPAIRS 10-4248-646-64 5,400.00 a 172828 06/10/88 102,143.00 BUS RECORDS CORP VOTING MACHINES 2S -4944- 180 -18 102,143.00 172829 06/10/88 23.00 TAYSTEE BAKING CO COST OF GS 26 -4624- 683 -68 23.00 172830 06/10/88 3,890.00 TIMS TREE SERV CONT REPAIRS 10 -4248- 644 -64 3,590.00 { 172831 06/10/88 176.00 MUELLER SALES CORP REPAIR PARTS 40-4540- 804 -80 176.00 { 172832 06/10/88 1,313.00 ASHLAND CHEM ACCESSORIES 10 -4620- 560 -56 1,313.00 4 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 172933 06/10/88 39,600.00 ASPEN EQUIP ASPHALT ROLLER 39,600.00 172834 06/10/88 692.95 TILLSON BUS Q EQUIP CONT REPAIRS 692.95 a 172835 06/10/88 1,197.14 COMM OF REV PET DIV GAS 1,197.14 172836 06/13/88 343.79 VESSCO REPAIR PARTS 172836 06/10/88 26.48 VESSCO REPAIR PARTS 3TO. ^ET c 172837 06/10/88 40.00 DAWN SIEMAN REFUND 40.00 * 172838 06/10/88 15.00 CHARLOTTE L PATERSON DUES 15.00 a 172439 06/10/88 19.00 CONNIE EVANS REFUND 19.00 * 172840 06/10/88 19.00 DEBORAH LAUB REFUND 19.00 172841 06/10/88 19.00 NEIL ERICKSON REFUND 19.00 172!-42 06/13/88 3,936.25 SCOTT AVIATION TESST STAND 3,936.25 172843 06/13/88 86.20 CUSTOM FIRE APP SUPPLIES 172843 OG /13/88 75.20 CUSTOM FIRE APP SUPPLIES 172843 06/13/88 86.20- CUSTOM FIRE APP SUPPLIES 76.20 * 172844 06/15/88 17.00 MN CONWAY FIRE a SAP EQUIP MAINT 172844 00/13/88 22.T5 MN CONWAT FIRE 6 SAP PREV MAINT ITEEF44 OG/13/88 125.00 MN CONWAY FIRE Q SAP GEN SUPPLIES 164.75 * 172845 06/13/88 25.00 RALPH JOHNSON DUES 25.00 * 172846 06/13/88 75.00 BILL BACH POSTAGE 172846 06/13/88 39.87 BILL BACH SUPPLIES 172846 06/13/88 38.27 BILL BACH SUPPLIES 172846 06/13/88 38.70 BILL BACH SUPPLIES 172846 06/13/88 11.64 BILL BACH PAINT 203.48 * 172847 06/13/88 25.00 KATHLEEN WALTERS SERVICES _. -- 25.00 * 172848 06/13/88 283.00 ROGER ZIMMERMAN SUPPLIES 06 -20 -88 PAGE 21 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. 4 MESSAGE 10- 4901 - 305 -30 10- 4248- S60 -56 10 -4612- 560 -56 40- 4540 - 805 -80 40-4540 - 805-80 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 4204 - 140 -14 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500- 000 -00 10 -4901- 440 -44 10- 4504 - 440 -44 10 -4504- 440 -44 10- 4504- 440 -44 10- 4274 - 420 -42 10- 4274- 440 -44 10-4504- 440 -44 10- 4201 - 200 -20 30- 4290 - 781 -78 30- 4504- T81 -T8 30 -4504- 782 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -T8 30- 4544 - 782 -78 30- 4201 - 781 -78 30 -4504- 781 -78 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 10- 4201 - 508 -50 283.00 * r 172849 06/13/88 28.39 110.00 TWIGS DELI GEN SUPPLIES 172849 06/13/88 9.34 110.00 TWIGS DELI GEN SUPPLIES 172849 06 /13/88 2.70 100.00 TWIGS DELI OFFICE SUPPLIES 23- 3265 - 000 -00 40.43 r * 172850 06 %13/88 10,147.00 50.00 POLAR CHEVY MAZDA CHEV CELEBAITY 172 °50 06/13/88 10,147.00 50.00 POLAR CHEVY MAZDA CHEV CELEBAITY 172 850 06/13/88 10,147.00 50.00 POLAR CHEVY MAZDA CHEV CELEBAITY 23 -3265- 000 -00 30,441.00 50.00 * 172851 06/13/88 2,000.00 50.00 PAVEMENT MGMT SYS PROF SERV PROF SERV 23- 4201 - 611 -61 2,000.00 50.00 * 172852 06/13/88 800.00 06/14/88 NORTH LIGHT PROTECH GEN SUPPLIES PROF SERV 23- 4201 - 611 -61 800.00 S6.00 * 06 -20 -88 PAGE 22 ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 30- 4504 - 781 -78 30- 4504 - 782 -78 30- 4516 - 781 -78 10- 4901 - 480 -48 10- 4901-490-49 10- 4901 - 650 -64 10- 4201 - 260 -26 10- 4504 - 645 -64 e :rr4a a+ 172855 06/13/88 3,682.40 SKOOL SHURTZ PROF SERV 10- 4201 - 508 -50 3,682.40 r 172856 06/14/88 110.00 JUDY SUBLETT SAL TEMP EMP 23-4120- 611 -61 110.00 r 172857 06/14/88 100.00 ARIBURT MUNZNER DONATIONS 23- 3265 - 000 -00 100.00 * 172858 06/14/88 50.00 NORMAN HOLEN DONATIONS - — "- - -- 23 -3265- 000-00 50.00 * 172859 06/14/88 50.00 PHYLLIS WEINER DONATIONS 23 -3265- 000 -00 50.00 * 17e860 06/14/88 50.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL PROF SERV 23- 4201 - 611 -61 50.00 * 172361 06/14/88 56.00 MICHAEL GATLIN PROF SERV 23- 4201 - 611 -61 S6.00 * 172862 06/14/88 112.50 SUSAN FRAME COST GOODS SOLD 23- 4624 - 613 -61 112.50 172863 06/14/88 240.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY SAL TEMP EMP 23- 4120 - 612 -61 240.00 172864 06/13/88 259.57 FAIRTRON CORP CONT REPAIRS 28- 4248- 702 -70 259.57 r 172865 06/13/88 6.53 COLLEEN PAULUS MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 6.53 *. 172866 06/13/88 557.80 MILLER DUNWIDDIE PROF SERF 10- 4^c01- 140 -14 557.80 $ *w* -CKS i 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION M�T FTf 172868 06/14/88 83.50 ZIP PRINTING PAPER SUPPLIES 83.50 172869 06/14/88 416.52 MARILU PROD GEN SUPPLIES 416.52 1722870 06/14/$8 11.20 EDIDA ART CENTER ART COMM 11.20 1722871 06/14/88 84.00 PHYLLIS HAYWA ART COMM 84.00 172872 06/14/88 100.00 PAT GREER ART COMM 100.00 x 172873 06/14/88 100.00 MARIE GENNE PROF SERV 100.00 * 172874 06/14/88 50.00 ANY ANDERSON PROF SERV 50.00 172875 06/14/88 1,545.00 REN MING PROF SERV 1,545.00 M 172876 06/14/88 21.00 NANCY TARBOX REG FEES 21.00 172877 06/14/88 199.50 BARRETT MOVING CONT SERV 199.50 172878 06/14/88 65.00 RICK RECKER CERTIFICATION 65.00 172879 06/14/88 63.11 KELLLY SERV PROF SERV 63.11 172880 06/14/88 124.72 S H BARTLETT CO GEN SUPPLIES 124.72 172881 06/14/88 1,610.00 AMERICAN PAINT 1,610.00 172882 06/14/88 38.00- CYNTHIA GROSS CORRECTION 172882 OG/14/88 19.00 CYNTHIA GROSS REFUND 172882 06/14/88 19.00 CYNTHIA GROSS REFUND 172882 06/14/88 19.00 CYNTHIA GROSS REFUND 19.00 x 172883 06/14/88 80.00 MGCSA REGISTRATION 80.00 s 172884 06/14/88 80.00 AMY SCHUENEMAN PROF SERV 06 -20 -88 PAGE 23 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 11 MESSAGE :r * * -CKS 10- 4514- S10-51 10 -4504- 646 -64 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501 - 000 -00 30- 3501- 000 -00 30 -4201- 781 -TS 30 -4201- 781 -78 23 -4201- 611-61 10- 3500- 000 -00 10- 4200 - 180 -18 10- 4201 - 508 -50 10 -4201- 490 -49 26- 4504 - 682 -68 26- 4544 - 682 -68 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 10- 3500- 000 -00 10- 3500 - 000 -00 27 -4204- 661 -66 27 -4201- 662 -66 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK-NO.-DATE--- CHECK REGISTER AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 80.00 » 06 -20 -88 PAGE 24 ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. N MESSAGE - « « « -CKS 17288S 06/14/88 86.50 COURT PROD GEN SUPPLIES 10-4504- 623 -62 86.50 « «f «h« - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - 172887 06/14/88 35.00 MCMA MEMBERSHIP 10- 4204 - 140 -14 35.00 « - - - - -- - - - -- ._._.._. - - -- - -- ~ 172888 06/14/68 80.00 ASSOC OF METRO MUNIC GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 100 -10 80.00 " . - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - 172889 06/14/88 S9.17 MERWYN WALKER MILEAGE 27 -4208- 661 -66 5 9 . 1 7 « - -- - - - - - - 172890 06/14/88 275.00 ESTATE OF GERTRUDE REFUND 10- 3180 - 000 -00 275.00 - -- -- -- - -- - -- v 172891 06/14/88 373.00 EUGENE DAVIS WEED INSP 10 -4201- 600 -60 172891 06/14/88 45.00 EUGENE DAVIS MILAGE 10-4208-800-60 418.00 « 172892 - 06714!88 ---- - - - -71 :78 CECELIA -SMITH - -. -- MILEAGE -'1 -0- =4208- 140 -14 - -- 71.78 « 172893 06/14/88 - 1,702.50 E H RENNER --- - -CONT REPAIRS 1,702.50 « 172894 06/14/88 -- - 303.40 AVR -INC` - - - -- - CASTING- 10 -4552= 345- 30 - - - -- t 172894 06/14/88 167.38 AVR INC CONCRETE 40 -4528- 803-80 470.78 172895 06/15/88 61,750.00 CO FIELD CO AIR CONDITIONING 2S -4946- 520 -52 nd 61,750.00 « 172896 06/IS/88 4,384.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE CONTRACTUAL SERVICE 10- 4200 - 358 -30 `. 4,384.00 « 172897 06/15/88 55.00 MPLS BRD REALTORS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 200 -20 55.00 « 172898 06/15/88 20.00 CLARE HOHMAN SALARY TEMP EMPL 10 -4120- 600 -60 20.00 172899 06/14/88 224.40 TODD ANDERSON SERVICES 10- 4201 - 630 -62 224.40 « 172900 06/14/88 60.00 DIANA HEDGES SALARY TEMP EMP 23- 4120 - 612 -61 i 60.00 « 172901 06/14/88 75.00 DOUG LEW PROF SERVICES 23- 4201 - 611 -61 v 75.00 « 172902 06/14/88 100.00 GLENN AUGUSTON DONATIONS 23 -3265- 000 -00 v c,. « « « -CKS 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 172903 172903 172903 172904 17'2`905 172906 172907 172908 172908 172908 172909 172910 172911 1T2912 172913 172914 172915 172916 172917 172918 172918 172919 06/15/88 06/15/88 GG/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/86 06/14/88 06/15/88 06/14/88 06/15/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/14/88 06/15/88 06/15/88 06/14/88 AMOUNT 100.00 100.00 10.00- 10.00 100.00 M 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 10.00- 10.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 fi 89.60 89.60 4: 45.50 45.50 87.50 87.50 « 94.22 94.22 s 76.70 76.70 109.00 109.00 x 31.75 31.75 M 284.13 240.36 524.49 s 28.00 CHECK. REGISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION CY TURNBLADH CY TURNBLADH CY TURNBLADH JANET DOWSETT MICHAEL CHAPMAN DAVID KORTE BONNIE GOLDBLATT MARGARET MCDOWELL MARGARET MCDOWELL MARGARET MCDOWELL TOM TYLER ANN FLANAGAN BARBARA LUNDGREN RICK KELLEY JEAN HAEFLE NORMA HANLON ANN VOGEL MARGARET MCDOWELL LEE AND DAN ROSS MOLLIE PAULSON MOLLIE PAULSON NANCY WALD DONATIONS CORRECTION DONATIONS DONATIONS DONATIONS DONATIONS DONATIONS CORRECTION DONATIONS DONATIONS DONATIONS DONATIONS SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER SALES OTHER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 25 ACCOUNT NO. INV. R P.O. w MESSAGE 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -326S- 000 -00 23- 3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23-3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 23 -3265- 000 -00 e3- 3625- 000 -00 23 -3625- 000 -00 23-3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23 -3625- 000 -00 23 -3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 000 -00 23- 3625- 613 -61 23- 3625- 000 -00 F ,r �r ~ 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 26 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE SALES OTHER 23- 3625- 000 -00 28.00 23- 3625- 000 -00 » 172920 06/14/88 75.45 SALES OTHER ANN WIDERSTROM ART WORK SOLD 23 -36ES- 000 -00 75.45 23- 3625- 000 -00 * 172921 06/14/88 42.00 ART WORK SOLD JEANETTE STORDAHL ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 42.00 10 -4504- 420 -42 CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 172922 06/14/88 45.50 MILEAGE ROXANNE SORENSON LICENSE INSPECT COST 10- 4206 - 420 -42 45.50 10- 4266- 420 -42 + 172923 06/14/88 94.50 KAY S. SCHLOSSER 94.50 « 1729a.4 06/14/88 104.30 BETTY BELL PEDDIE 104.30 172925 06/14/88 105.00 BRYAN MOON 105.00 » 172926 06/14/88 212.80 SHARON MCKISSON 212.80 172927 06/14/88 42.00 DICK GREEN 42.00 172928 06/14/88 161.28 EDINA FOUNDATION 161.28 172929 06/14/88 25.20 RHONHILD BERGSTOL 25.20 172930 06/14/88 25.20 BRAD SENN 225.20 172931 06/tS/88 41.30 DODD TECH CORP 41.30 « 172932 06/15/88 900.00 WH HARRIS 6 ASSOC 900.00 172933 06/15/88 173.04 OEI 173.04 » 1729?4 06/15/88 33.15 Don Enger 33.15 172935 06/14/88 28.27 JAMES FISCHER 172935 06/14/88 193.59 JAMES FISCHER 221.86 172936 06/15/88 19.00 BRENDA ROCHE 19.00 172937 06/15/88 1,907.60 ARPS TREE SERV SALES OTHER 23- 3625- 000 -00 SALES OTHER 23- 3625- 000 -00 SALES OTHER 23 -3625- 000 -00 SALES OTHER 23 -3625- 000 -00 SALES OTHER 23 -3625- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23 -36ES- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23-362 ^5 - 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD - 23 -3625- 000 -00 ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625 - 000 -00 GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 420 -42 CONFERENCE & SCHOOL 10- 4202 - 4220 -42 GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 420 -42 MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 420 -42 LICENSE INSPECT COST 10- 4206 - 420 -42 UNIFORM REIMS 10- 4266- 420 -42 REGISTRATION FEES 10 -3500- 000 -00 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10 -4248- 644 -64 _. _ , �.._... , - �. -.I.; ,'.. �rrr �- ...�n.r.•..^R^�- �+m+"..'�... TTY""• p!' �".^^" �•..•..�.....- �,'...n�... -..... ..._ ....- - CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 27 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE U.S. WEST CELLULAR FME CORP ALCATEL MAE PET CARE SERV HERBERT DECKER ADST�0 GOn�lM1IC ADS TO GO INC ADS TO GO INC ADS TO GO INC Ads To Go Inc DAVES FOOD WAGON AUTO MACHINE SUPPLY TSa,826.92 FUND 10 1983 CITY OF EDINA FUND CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT FUND 25 1,907.60 172938 06/15/88 124.63 TOTAL 65,754.T1 1224.63 172939 06/1S/88 42,97 FUND 28 42.97 i 17940 06/15/88 51.00 TOTAL 18,616.30 51.00 r 172941 06/15/88 1,897.25 FUND 50 1,897.25 x 172942 06/15/e8 56.00 TOTAL 120,675.00 56.00 + 172943 06/15/88 680.00 172943 OG/15/88 680.00 172543 06/15/88 196.36 172943 OG/15/88 196.30 172943 00/15 /88 19G.-,SG 172943 06/15/88 680.00 2629.08 172944 06/15/88 292.00 292.00 261010 06/09/88 53.61 53.61 CHECK REGISTER 06 -20 -88 PAGE 27 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE U.S. WEST CELLULAR FME CORP ALCATEL MAE PET CARE SERV HERBERT DECKER ADST�0 GOn�lM1IC ADS TO GO INC ADS TO GO INC ADS TO GO INC Ads To Go Inc DAVES FOOD WAGON AUTO MACHINE SUPPLY TSa,826.92 FUND 10 TOTAL 5,515.11 FUND 23 TOTAL 164,289.54 FUND 25 TOTAL 5,459.16 FUND 26 TOTAL 65,754.T1 FUND 2T TOTAL 1,231.22 FUND 28 TOTAL 4,893.83 FUND 30 TOTAL 18,616.30 FUND 40 TOTAL 107,095.58 FUND 50 TOTAL 752.50 FUND 60 TOTAL 120,675.00 FUND 66 TOTAL 1,253,109.87 TOTAL EQUIP RENTAL POSTAGE POSTAGE KENNEL SERV ELECTION SIGNS ADvVPiWHNG ADVERTISING ADVERTISING ADVERTISING Advertising COST OF GS 10 -4226- 420 -42 10- 4290 - 510 -51 10 -4290- 510 -51 10 -4278- 470 -47 55inn0--- 4215 /,0 4- 12880 -18 SD 4421 4 45224 82 50- 4214 - 822 -82 50 -4214- 842 -84 50- 4214 - 862 -86 50- 4214- 862 -86 27- 4624 - 663 -66 26454468268 26- 4544 - 682 -68 GENERAL FUND ART CENTER CAPITAL FUND SWIMMING POOL FUND GOLF COURSE FUND RECREATION CENTER FUND EDINSOROUGH PARK UTILITY FUND LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND CONSTRUCTION FUND IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 d w-+ *-CKS —w -CKS 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05-31'88 PAGE 1 CHECK N0. DATE.. -_ -- AMOUNT VENDOR_________ ITEM_,DESCRIPTION - _ACCOUNT.. NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE -- 123251 05/24/88 130,000.00 HRA EDINA HRA TRANSFER 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL - - - - -- 000.00-- *--- ... - - - -- - , wwww *» •w+ -CKS 123739 05/24/88 460.00 POSTMASTER MAILING 23- 4290- S10 -51 MANUAL j 460.00 + ww• -CKS 124190 05/24/8899.94 GRIGGS_ COOPER ., - -_ INVENTORY 50- 4630- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 99.94 • - -- -- - -- - - -- -- - www » »» www -CKS 1125772 05/24/88 5.00 PERA INTEREST 10- 4145- S10 -51 MANUAL - - -- -- - - -- - -- -- S.00 r ww * » »w w +w -CKS 126800 05/24/88 71.93 BRAEMAR MAILING DEPOSITE 10- 4290 - 520 -52 MANUAL 71.93 + 126801 05124/88 353.10 U3 POSTAL BULK POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 520 -52 MANUAL 353.10 + 130848 05/24/88 2,000.00 POSTMASTER - POSTAGE - 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 2,600.00 r - -- -- -- - - - - -- i 130849 05/24/88 ._ _ 944. 99 IND, - SCHOOL_ 273 -__ KIDS CLUB 10-4540-S60-S6 MANUAL 944.99 + • * + » »» ww• -CKS - -- t' 131067 06/08/88 187.95 CAPITAL CITY DIST. 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 131067 -- 06/08/88 3.50_- -. -_ -- .CAPITAL- CITY DIST. _- _- _ -_._ -- 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 131067 06/08/88 191.45- CAPITAL CITY DIST. _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 131067 06/08/88 191.45 CAPITAL CITY DIST. 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 191.45 + •ww +ww + ++ -CKS 131138 06/08/88 53.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 131138 06/08/88 7.10- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 131138 06/08/88. 53.33 -_ ED_ PHILLIPS_ 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL - 131138 06/08/88 7.14- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 _ MANUAL 131138 06/08/88 53.33 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 131138 _ - 06/08/88 -__- 53.33 - -_- _ED PHILLIPS ___..50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 131138 06/08/88 9.56- ED PHILLIPS - 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 131138 06/08/88 .62- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL I'. 131138 _ _06/08/88 4.20- ED _PHILLIPS -- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL i 131138 06/08/88 2.57- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 -- - - -- MANUAL _';� 131138 06/08/88 53.33- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL �` I d a Y a • • • 0 • 1988 OF EDINA 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL CHECK LSTER CHECK NO. --.DATE-----,-- AMOUNT _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 ITEM DESCRIPTION ---VENDOR-.-------- - -- 131138 06/08/88 4.20- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 _ _.__. __ __ ___19.57- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 11.73- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 19.57 ED PHILLIPS 131138 -._- _ 06/08/88 COOPER ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 17.39- ED PHILLIPS — 131138 06/08/88 7.14- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 06/08/88 11.33- PHILLIPS 31138 06/08/88 8.40- _ED ED _ PHILLIPS - 131138 06/08/88 4.86- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 _- 8.48- ED 50- 4628- 842 -84 131138 06/08/88 14.81- ED _PHILLIPS PHILLIPS -- -- - -- — 131138 06/08/88 107.83 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 107.83- _50- 4628- 862 -86 PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 ._.- - 107.83- -_,ED ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 2,666.90- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 - - - - - -- 2,666.90 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/86 357.25 ED PHILLIPS - -- - -- — -- 131138 06/08/88 2,666.90- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 - 2,666.90.---.—ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 2,666.90 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 355.40 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88- 869.55___ ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 357.25 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 5,391.68 ED PHILLIPS 1 31 138 06/08/88 _ _ 740.60 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 5,391.68- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 5,391.68 ED PHILLIPS 131138. __- 06/08/88 - - - -- - 62.85_ ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 -- 956.10 --ED PHILLIPS - -- - - - - - - - -- — 131138 06/08/88 257.50 ED PHILLIPS 131 138 06/08/88 __- 420. 00 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/09/88 1,957.50 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 268.94 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 1,957.50 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 1,173.35 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 1,957.50- ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 __ 420.00 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 848.50 ED PHILLIPS 131138 06/08/88 840.00 ED PHILLIPS 131 138 — _ 06/08/88 486.45 ED PHILLIPS \131138 05/24/88 90.94 ED PHILLIPS INVENTORY 18,229.15 05 -31 -8 AGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL - 131190 06/08/88 _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 'I 131190 06/08/88 10.56- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190 06/08/88 61.90- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190 .__._ 06/08/88 5.22-- .- ,.__ -- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190 06/08/88 20.98- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190 06/08/88 13.09- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190_ _06/08/88 21.37- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 131190 06/08/88 11.33- GRIGGS COOPER-AND C • 131190 06/08/88 78.89- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 05 -31 -8 AGE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50-3710-862-86 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL- 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL __50-4626-822-82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL __50-4626-842-84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL — 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _- 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL s «• -CKS — 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50-3710-822-82__________ - MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88,__._____ 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 131190 06/08/88 1131190 06/08/88 12,127.65 r 131285 CHECK REGISTER 3.55- 05 -31 -88 PAGE 3 AMOUNT VENDOR 88.45- __.______ ITEM .DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 21.13- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 3,095.06 _ ..._. GRIGGS COOPER AND C ___ - - - -_ _ _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 654.59 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 3,944.47 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL _- S27. 97 _ GRIGGS COOPER AND . C _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 260.79 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL 216.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 1,049.09 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ -,. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 1,068.58 GRIGGS COOP -ER AND C 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 62.95- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 056.49 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 566.35 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 12,127.65 r No __-_JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE _JOHNSON WINE - - -- -- - -- - JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE - - -- - - - - -- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE ___- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE _.JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE ___JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - --- - - - - -- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50-4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 SO- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50-4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50-4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL r ** -CKS - J i �.i 131285 06/08/88 3.55- 131285 06/08/88 88.45- 131285 06/08/88 3.46 131285 06/08/88 3.68- 131285 06/08/88 19.43- 131285 06/08/88 115.72- 131285 -. -_ 06/08/88 16.69- 131285 06/08/88 _ 10.98- 131285 06/08/88 .94- 131285 06/08/88 _. -. _.. .94 131285 06/08/88 4.54- 131285 06/08/88 .94 131285 ___06/08/88 58.27- 131285 06/08/88 .70- 131285 06/08/88 173.04- 131285 06/08/88 19.60 131285 06/08/88 4,421.82 131285 06/08/88 5,786.41 131285 --- 06/08/88 - ------ 28.70__ 131285 06/08/88 - - - -- - - 2,-913.77 131285 06/08/88 15.05 13128S 06/08/88 _ 355.68 131285 06/08/88 368.26 131285 06/08/88 3.15 131285 06/08/88 -- ._ - - -- 8.05 131285 06/08/88 -1 944. 91 -- V 131285 06/08/88 1,, 668.30 131285 06/08/88 30.45 131285 06/08/88 19.60 i 1312285 06/08/88 21.35 131285 -- 06/08/88 - -- 94.18- 131285 06/08/88 - 455.16 - 131285 06/08/88 5.25 131285 - - _ 06/08/88 131285 06/08/88 94.88 - 131285 06/08/88 11099.02 131285 06/08/88 94.88 _ 18,579.00 r b No __-_JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE _JOHNSON WINE - - -- -- - -- - JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE - - -- - - - - -- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE ___- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE _.JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE ___JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - --- - - - - -- JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50 -3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 842 -84 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4626- 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628 - 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822 -82 50-4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 SO- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628- 862 -86 50-4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 862 -86 50 -4628- 862 -86 50-4628- 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 50- 4628 - 862 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL r ** -CKS - J i �.i J988 OF EDINA CHECK ..u,_- DATE ___ _ 131311 06/08/88 131435 05/24/88 1131435 05/24/88 * # * * ## AMOUNT _ 105.00 . 105.00 # 37.19 _ ---- _. 111.57 _. 148.76 • CHECK STER __ VENDOR__ _ _ - ITEM DESCRIPTION EASTSIDE BEVERAGE GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY GRIGGSS COOPER __INVENTOY 131451 06/08/88 36.45- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 _ 9. 17- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 ._. 2.65- QUALITY _ -- - -- - - - -- WINE 131451 06/08/88 17.74- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 - ------- 26.03- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 -- - - -- ---- 3.12- QUALITY'WINE - - -- - - --— 131451 06/08/88 .84- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 _ _.- 8.4S- 104.07- WINE 131451 06/08/88 _---_._---QUALITY 3.12- QUALITY _ WINE - - - - - -_- - 131451 06/08/88 1.02- QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 -- ------------ - 64.63- QUALITY WINE 131451 �� 06/08/88 - - - -- - -- 11.59- QUALITY WINE - - - - - - -- - - - -- 131451 06/08/88 1,823.10 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 1,301.57 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 422.31 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 3,231.35 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 _ QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 _264.35 915.35 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 1,698.00 QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 -_ ___.. 312.42 QUALITY WINE 131 451 06/08188 - -- -- - -- --- --- - - - - -- 131451 06/08/88 312.42 1,155.65 QUALITY QUALITY WINE WINE 131451 _ 06/08/88 - - 83.75_ QUALITY WINE 131451 06/08/88 -- - - - "- 101.70 QUALITY WINE----_.._ 131451 05/25/88 71.90 QUALITY WINE 131451 05/25/88 _ 17.77 QUALITY WINE # # # # ## 131514 06/08/88 # # # # ## 11,526.83 * 54.00 S4.00 # SALUD AMERICA 132095 05/25/88 16.68- COMM OF REVENUE 132095 05/25/88 168.68 COMM OF REVENUE 132095 .__.. 05/25/88 _ _ _ _ 16.68 COMM OF REVENUE 132095 05/25/88 218.27 COMM OF REVENUE 132095 05/25/88 104.07 COMM OF REVENUE 13209S____.__os/es/8S MANUAL 104.07 COMM OF REVENUE 132095 05/25/88 104.07- COMM OF REVENUE 132095 05/25/88 81052.89 COMM OF REVENUE 1, 1 INVENTORY INVENTORY 05 -31 -8 iGE 4 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 50- 4628- 842 -84_ MANUAL * * *-CK S 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL SO- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS SO- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 - MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 - MANUAL 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4632 - 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL CORRECTION 10- 3357 - 000 -00 -- SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 SALES TAX 10- 3357 - 000 -00 SALES TAX - -- 23 -3357- 000 -00 SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 CORRECTION _ _ 26- 3357 - 000 -00 SALES TAX 27- 3357 - 000 -00 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL I » 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31-88 PAGE 5 CHECK.NO._ DATE AMOUNT ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV: N -_P.O. k MESSAGE 1 `. 132095 05/25/88 166.78 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 28- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL • 132095 05/25/88 127.90 _ _ COMM OF REVENUE _ SALES TAX 29- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 132095 05/25/88 257.33 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 30- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 132095 05/25/88 396.24 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 40- 3357- 000 -00 MANUAL • 132095 05/25/88 _ - -. 7,S23.09 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 001 -00 MANUAL �. 132095 05/25/88 14,628.13 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX _ _ 50 -3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 132095 05/25/88 12,683.02 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357- 003 -00 MANUAL • _ 44,326.40 w _ • I * ** -CKS • 133112 05/24/88 134.99 DAYTONS SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 MANUAL 133112 05/24/88 134.99- DAYTONS CORRECTION 10 -4504- 510 -51 MANUAL • 133112 05/24/88 _ . . .. .. 3.06 ..._ DAYTONS _ . _ . __- SUPPLIES___- .____- _._._._.__ MANUAL 3.06 * ** -CKS 133354 05/25/88 627.99 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 1130 - 000 -00 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 .- _ _._._.. __...396.23._._ ------ MINNEGASCO _ - - _ . -._ HEAT ___._.___ 10-42S4-440-44 MANUAL 133354 05/25/88 574.92 MINNEGASCO _ _— HEAT _ 10- 4254 - 520 -52 MANUAL 133354 05/25/88 21508.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 10- 4254 - 540 -54 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 779.67 _ _ MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 10- 4254- 646 -64 MANUAL 40 133354 05/25/88 132.23 MINNEGASCO HEAT _ 23- 4254 - 612 -61 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 901.61 MINNEGASCO HEAT 27 -4254- 662 -66 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 ___.__.._ 94.82 - .-- ._- .__-- MINNEGASCO _ HEAT _ 27- 4254 - 664 -66 MANUAL db 133354 05/25/88 1,811.78 MINNEGASCO HEAT 28- 4254- 702 -70 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 21191.01 MINNEGASCO HEAT 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL • 133354 05/2s/88 167.86 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40- 4254 - 801 -80 MANUAL 133354 05/25/88 1,887.93 MINNEGASCO HEAT 40 -4254- 803 -80 MANUAL 133354 05/25/88 31.68 MINNEGASCO HEAT 50- 4254 - 821 -82 MANUAL • 133354 05/25/88 _ 58.91 MINNEGASCO __- -_ _ HEAT 50- 4254 - 841 -84 MANUAL 133354 05/25/88 151.08 MINNEGASCO _ HEAT 50- 4254 - 861 -86 MANUAL 12,315.90 * * * * ** * ** -CKS • 133391 05/25/88 25.75 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 301 -30 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 13,308.56 NORTHERN STATEDS _ ELECTRIC _ 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL u 133391 05/25/88 11,123.90 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 322 -30 MANUAL ' 133391 05/25/88 _ - 2,260.82 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 330 -30 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 403.67 NORTHERN STATEDS - _ ELECTRIC _ 10- 4252- 345 -30 MANUAL `.. 133391 05/25/88 72.32 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 358 -30 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 _. -.-.21123. 11 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 886.72 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 440 -44 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 45.10 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252- 460 -46 MANUAL I 133391 05/25/88 26.14 STATEDS . _ _ ELECTRIC 10 -4252- 520 -52 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 1,515.19 NORTHERN STATEDS ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL `' 133391 05/25/88 658.87 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10- 4252 - 630 -62 MANUAL • 133391 05/25/88 _ . - -_ - 1,660. 01 - NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 10-42S2-646-64 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 435.91 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 23- 4252- 612 -61 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 83.18 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 26- 4252 - 682 -68 MANUAL ' 133391 05 /25/881.,293.48 — NORTHERN_ STATES ELECTRIC 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 207.63 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 27- 4252- 664 -66 MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 3,496.30 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 28- 4252 - 702 -70 MANUAL a di�. �i r t•�i si rf�(,•( J. ,.� �"M *� @ rl' 1 i1�1 f1 � 4 '�t! tii "(( ;.,It'�'�S� I ' rtt #tort OI 134430 _ -- 05/24/88 v v 134506 05/24/88 134506 05/24/88 v, ' #ttrttrt •r ' 137701 05/24/88 05 -31 -8. AGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 29- 4252 - 722 -72 1988 OF EDINA MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 CHECK '`7STER ♦r' 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL 50 -4252- 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL _— _ -__50 -4252- 861 -86 CHECK N0,_. DATE,__- __- _. - -___ MANUAL 28- 4256 - 702 -70 DESCRIPTION- - ., 133391 05125/88 276.59 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC MANUAL 133391 05/25/88 6,624.77 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 133391 05/25/88 21281.18 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 133391 05/25/88 15,882.08 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 133391 _ 05/25/88 37.09 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 133391 05/25/88 465.88 NORTHERN STATES _ _ ELECTRIC .. 133391 05/25/88 821.04 NORTHERN STATES ELECTRIC 133391 05/25/88 _.. 672.86 - NORTHERN_ STATES - ELECTRIC 66,688.15 + -- - -- - +trtrt #+ 133396 05/24/88 351.51 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 7.85 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 3,738.64 NW BELL TELEPHONE ur 133396 05/24/88 101.82 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396. 05/24/88 144.52 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 141.84 _ NW BELL TELEPHONE v 133396 05/24/88 49.57 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 253.87 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 61.58 NW BELL - TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 434.24 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 .._._ -- 05/24/88 40.44 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 672.36 NW BELL ______ _ _ ___ TELEPHONE er 133396 05/24/88 104.37 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 __. _ .. 307. 80 _ NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 148.86 NW BELL TELEPHONE v 133396 05/24/88 177.29 NW BELL TELEPHONE 133396 05/24/88 124_.54 NW BELL -- TELEPHONE 6 , 861.1 0 - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - W + +tttrt p ,133541 05/24/88 133.99 TARGET SUPPLIES __ -- -- - - - ---- - - - - 133 + - -,99 p + +trttt 133700 05/25/88 27,303.05 HENN CTY TREAS TAXES _ v 27,303.05 + rtt #tort OI 134430 _ -- 05/24/88 v v 134506 05/24/88 134506 05/24/88 v, ' #ttrttrt •r ' 137701 05/24/88 05 -31 -8. AGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4252 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 801 -80 MANUAL 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL 40- 4252 - 804 -80 MANUAL 50 -4252- 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4252 - 841 -84 MANUAL _— _ -__50 -4252- 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10- 4201 - 622 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 460 -46 MANUAL 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4256- 628 -62 MANUAL 10- 4256- 646 -64 MANUAL 23- 4256- 612 -61 -- - - MANUAL 26- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL - ___27- 4256 - 662 -66 MANUAL 27- 4256 - 664 -66 MANUAL 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL 29- 4256 - 722 -72 MANUAL 30- 4256 - 782 -78 MANUAL 40- 4256 - 801 -80 MANUAL -- 40- 4256 - 803 -80 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 821 -82 MANUAL 50- 4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL 50 -42567861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS 10-4504- 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 0- 4922 - 506 -50 MANUAL -- ----- -- _...-- - --- --- -._ - # ## -CKS 369.73 PERA__---- -__ - -_ __._..__- -PERA - - -- - - - - - - -1 0- 4145-510-51 MANUAL 22, 369.73 * .. . -. _. ._ .. . 13,274.83 FIDELITY CITY FICA _ _ 353.46 _FIDELITY__________ - - - _ CITY MEDICARE 13,628.29 86,000.00- CITY OF EDINA * ** -CKS 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL • • -- - * ** -CKS PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL • a 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -88 PAGE 7 CHECK NO. DATE _ _ - -__- _ -__ -_- AMOUNTVENDOR - -- - - - -- - .- - - -.... _. ____- . ITEM - DESCRIPTION__- __- _ACCOUNT_NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 137701 05/24/88 86,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL .00 • * ** -CKS ' 138055 05/24/88 50.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 3230 - 000 -00 MANUAL 138055 05/24/88 260.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4120 - 663 -66 MANUAL ' 138055 05/24/88 _.212.44 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4120- 666 -66 MANUAL ` 138055 05/24/88 10.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 138055 05/24/88 96.64 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4504- 662 -66 MANUAL 138055 05/24/88 _ _ 21.18 GOLF _ PETTY CASH 27 -4504- 666 -66 MANUAL 138055 05/24/88 44.44 BRAEMAR GOLF _ _ PETTY CASH __ 27- 4600 - 661 -66 MANUAL 138055 05/24/88 101.92 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4624- 663 -66 MANUAL ' 138055 05/24/88 _ - .40. 63 _._ BRAEMAR. GOLF _ PETTY_ CASH_________ 27 -4636- 666 -66 MANUAL 837.25 __- _ - - - - -- -- - - - _ ` 138138 06/08/88 7.68- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL • 138138 06/08/88 __46.15- ED PHILLIPS .._- - " -- - -- - - 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ` 138138 06/08/88 .93- ED PHILLIPS _ - -- - - - - - -- 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 12.95- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 _15.23- _ _ ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL '. 138138 06/08/88 7.80- ED PHILLIPS _ - _ _ - 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 80.89- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL • 138138 06/08/88 ED PHILLIPS MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 17.13- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 3.37- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL • 138138 ____06/08/88 - _ 73.07- _ -ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 2,307.86 ED PHILLIPS _ -- - 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 4,044.77 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ' 138138 06/08/88 _ 390. 20 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 3,653.64 ED PHILLIPS _________ -- 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 1381 18 06/08/88 93.18 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL • 138138 06/08/88 ___11295.50_ ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL qb 138138 06/08/88 768.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 1,523.15 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL • 138138 06/08/88 .56.15- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 1,788.80 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138138 06/08/88 337.10 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - 138138 06/08/881_,713.35 ED PHILLIPS - - - --- - " - - -- - -- - -- 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL .. 1 T, 576.42 * - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- ** *-CKS 45 j 138190 05/24/88 1.52- GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50- 3710 - 003 -00 MANUAL 138190 05/24/88 .96- GRIGGS COOPER_ DISCOUNT 50- 3710 - 003 -00 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 21.00- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 10.64- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' 138190 - 06/08/88 20.67- GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ v 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 62.82- GRIGGS COOPER _ AND C _ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 8.98- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C ____ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 92.85- GRIGGS COOPER ___ ____ __________ __ _ AND C _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 6.12- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 1988 C OF EDINA CHECK - ` "4TER 05 -31 -88 GE 8 CHECK NO. _- DATE AMOUNT _ _ _ _ _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE I, .- 138190 06/08/88 92.85- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 _ 92.85 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL J 138190 06/08/88 12.70- GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 1,033.60 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138190. 06/08/88 _3,140.96 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 4,642.33 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL �. 138190 06/08/88 4,642.33- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 _ -- 4,642.33 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL a 138190 06/08/88 1,031.55 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL .� 138190 06/08/88 532.06 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 -- - - - -- 449.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C_______________ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 611.46 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 80 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 305.75 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 138190 06/08/88 635.04 GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL ! 138190 05/24/88 18.59 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTOY SO- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL ..r 138190 05/24/88 76.64 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 138190 05/224/88 _ _ 102.25 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTORY 50-4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 138190 1138190 05/24/88 75.90 GRIGGS COOPER _ __ __ INVENTORY- SO- 4632- 862 -86 MANUAL 05/24/88 47.80 GRIGGS COOPER INVENTOROY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL - - -- b •islet# ssr -CKS 138285 06/08/88 161.41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL .r 138285 06/08/88 3.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 _- 06/08/88 36.50 - ___,JOHNSON WINE __. 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL r 138285 06/08/88 43.50- JOHNSON WINE _ __ SO -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL �.r 138285 06/08/88 505.88- JOHNSON WINE SO- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 30.50- JOHNSON WINE______ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 65.94- JOHNSON WINE ___ _ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL v 138285 06/08/88 28.94 JOHNSON WINE 80- 3710 - 522 -82 MANUAL 138285 06 /08/88 5.99- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 28.94 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL v 138285 06/08/88 5.99- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 _______ 06/08/88_ - -- 28.94- -- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 28.94 - JOHNSON WINE---- - - - - - - - -— SO- 3710- 822 -82 - - - MANUAL v 138285 06/08/88 2.96- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 13828S 06/08/88 _ - -., _ -. _ . 1 S _ ------- WINE 50- 371 0- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 28.94- JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL �s 138285 06/08/88 .74 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL .. 138285 06/08/88 S.34- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 5.99 JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL or 138285 06/08/88 10.12- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 13828S 06/08/88 81.49- JOHNSON WINE 50-3710-842-84 MANUAL v 138285 06/08/88 5.42- JOHNSON WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL v j 138285 06/08/88 3.59- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL ". 138285 06/08/88 3._94- JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/68 93.88- JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL �,. 138285 06/08/88 4.15- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 _..._,- 06/08/88 .03 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 12.56- JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL v 138285 06/08/88 5.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 _ _ 1,-4.46.-20- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL r 138285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE — _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 .. MANUAL w 138285 06/08/88 5.78- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL G t • 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -88 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE _ _ AMOUNT_ -_. __________._ _ __ __- __ VENDOR ___ __,__-_--- ITEMDESCRIPT-ION___-_-ACCOUNT NO. INV.-.# P.O. k MESSAGE '. 138285 06/08/88 5.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 13885 06/08/88 1,446.20 JOHNSON WINE _.... .. -_.._ 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 1,446.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 5.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 -- 06/08/88 18.19--JOHNSON WINE _ -_ -__- _ 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 1,446.20 JOHNSON _ -_ __- WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 5.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 1,446.20- JOHNSON WINE _ . - - _ ....- . _._.. 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 4,074.62 JOHNSON WINE - .. 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL ' 1382$5 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 13822285 06/08/88 - 17.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 4,694.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 19.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE _.., 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138235 06/08/88 599.23 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 598.93 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 _ 06/08/88 _ 74.84 -__ - -_ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 11.20 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 6.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/8$ _ -_ . -.. 533.23 ___.. JOHNSON WINE ___._.._.._...-._ . 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL r' 138285 06/08/$8 295.56 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 1382285 06/08/88 599.23- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 . _ - _ . 00_ JOHNSON WINE _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - 138285 06/08/88 2.10 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 6.65 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 6.65- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 22.05 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 4.20 _JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 360.24 JOHNSON _ WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 541.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 _- 4.55 JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 1,012.36 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 138285 06/09/88 4.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 19.95 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - 138285 06/08/88 11259.18 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 138285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 3.61 = - JOHNSON WINE _- _ -- 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1382285 06/08/88 394.08 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 414.87 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 . - JOHNSON WINE _ _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 138285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON _ WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 14,545.51 • _ •� * *# + * * -CKS 138451 06/08/88 5.81- _- _-- ______ QUALITY WINE _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 138451 06/08/88 23.35- QUALITY _ WINE _ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 138451 06 /08/88 10.88- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 138451 06/08/88 _. ......,_- .5.08- ----- -_._- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 138451 06/08/88 29.79- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 138451 06/08/88 1.36- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138451 _ 06/08/88 _48.46- QUALITY WINE ___________________ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 138451 06/08/88 10.85- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - 138451 06/08/88 1,167.24 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL ,_ ] 1988 OF ^ozwA . 13870e ' . ' - '�' --'--------'�--_- coscw Io7sm --_- - 05-31 - e AGE 10 � o*sCx wz o�rs '- 138708 ' 13670* ' P.O. w msSn*os _ ~.' 138*51 oa/vu/ue 1,489.57 ou»��Tv u�ws 50-46e6-8*e-8* mAwu«L 138451 oa/oa/on '_-- 2'*e3.81 _ . mo^LIrr WINE . sw-*aao-oae-oa n»wo»L 138*51 oa/on/na sru .yo uo���rY --------------------'- wzws - so-*aau-uee-oe mxwuAL 138451 oa/ue/aa 1,087.90 ou*��T, w�ws 50-46e8-8*e-84 mAwu«L 138*sI - Va�oo�oo sor.eo_----- mu»LzTY wzws ---------------------''-------------'so-�aeo-uae-aa----'' 50-*628-84e-84 n»wuxL , � 1384sI oa/oa/oa 1,08e.00 QUALITY wzws Jsmn,a '-- - m»wuxL 138*sI oa/on/aa 13s.60 QUALITY wIws 50-+6e8-86e-86 MANUAL aoppLIsa . 139e79 ------- os/2s/88_____________72`y?�______xsnn?a xAnowAes ~- ****** ' - m«woAL . 13870e ' - -- os/e*/ ea ~~ . 3*7.00- 138703 os/ey/oe �+r ww 138708 ' 13670* --- - - '--- ~~ 13870* os/a*/oa 1 3870* os/a*/ao� 120.00 * �---------- _ ***-nww ---p� -�o'4S6* 628 -a2--- -- MANUAL 140.00 mw poLLuTzow PERMIT 140.00 * ---------1s6 'oK -----mw'Dspr- HEALTH ----- Tso.00- mw osALr* 150.00 -_ MW- DEPT HEALTH 150.00 * PERMIT-�'- uonnscrzow psomzT —� %w 66-1300-37T-nl' nAwo»L 66- 13V4-o63-u2------ - m«woAL 60 -1300-363-0e ~~ `' 138708 va,oa/oa 3*7.00- ^ 138708 - 06/08/88 -------- �+r ww 138708 oo/ou/aa 3.75- ------------�-------- 138708 oa/oo/oa 3.75 . 139279 os/es/ua e09.06 %w 66-1300-37T-nl' nAwo»L 66- 13V4-o63-u2------ - m«woAL 60 -1300-363-0e mAwuwL 607 13uo7363-o2 �_-- � _ mAmu*L 10 4504-322-30 ***-cwo 139e79 os/as/oo 10. 97 JsnnYa xAnow*nE---- --aoppLzE&------ ~_ 139279 os/es/ua e09.06 xsnmro o*nouAns ooppLIsa _ 1soeryos/es/n8 mAwuxL ll.s6 JERRYS nAnow«ns ouppLzsa _1u-4s4w-sao-sa ____ voyary os/cs/aa 22.00 ���JsnnYw*AnowAos--------- mAwuxL SUPPLIES -------- .� . 139e79 os/es/oo 7e.77 JseRYa oxnouwns nuppLIsa 29-*so4-7ee-72 ----'--� vsyars '�' os/es/oo-_-' __-_- 1.88 rsnmra xAoouAns ouppLIsw � vooary os/as/na 1ee.1e Jsmn,a yAnowAns------- ooppLzsw------- 1oyery os/as/ao *s.ay Jsnn,a **nou«ns aoppLIsa . 139e79 ------- os/2s/88_____________72`y?�______xsnn?a xAnowAes uuppLzsa 139e79 os/es/eo 17.16 JsmnYa xAnouAns--------'SuppLxsS------- ^~'| 139279 os/as/na 61.48 asnnYo *Anou*ns ouppLIsa ., 139279 -os/es/ao ao.aVasnnYS HARDWARE 139e79 05/es/as 1e.04 xsnRYa *«nowAns ~� | 139e79 os/es/oo os.as Jsan,a *«nowxns nspAzn p*n7o 139e79'--_.-05/25/00�a`0o snnvo xAnuwAns auppLIso � 139279 os/es/oa 17.15 JsmnYa oAnowAns -------auppLzsa'- ------- ~~ 139e79 05/es/as ee.sy JsenYo x«nuwxns ooppLzso 139279 os/es/ao ---_-_-__- _1*.99_______zsnnra nAnouAns auppLzsa 139e79 os/es/oo a'Toe.ow asnwYu xAnuu«ns _ - ouppLIso-----'-- ` 139e79 os/as/eo 19.98 xsRn,w *xnowAns noppLIsw 139279 os/25/e0 �4�`e3Jsnn,o yAnowAns aoppLIsa 139e79 os/es/oo ee�. 91 JsnnYS HARDWARE ----------SUPPLIES 139e79 os/as/oa 2ee.77 JsnR,m xAmou*ns wuppLzsm %w 66-1300-37T-nl' nAwo»L 66- 13V4-o63-u2------ - m«woAL 60 -1300-363-0e mAwuwL 607 13uo7363-o2 �_-- � _ mAmu*L 10 4504-322-30 ***-cwo so-+uee-oee-we mxwuAL sV-*aeo-oee-oa MANUAL _ 50-462e-e2e-8e mAwuxL 50-46e8-8ee-82 MANUAL 10-*so*-se0-se ***-own ----10-4504-260-26 - m^wo«L 10-450*-301-30 MANUAL 10-4504-318-30 mAwu*L 10 4504-322-30 - MANUAL' 10-*504-3e5-30 MANUAL ____l0-*s0*-390-30 nxwoAL 10-*su4-440-** mxwoAL 10-*so*-470-*7 mAwo*L 10-*so*-se0-se mAwuAL 10-4504-s*0-54 _- ---��- MANUAL 10-+so4-s60-s* MANUAL ____10-4s0*-646-6* mAwuxL _ 10-4so4-660-66 MANUAL 10-4s*0-s*0-s* MANUAL _1u-4s4w-sao-sa ____ mxwuxL iw-*s*o-a4a-a4---�---- - - m«wuAL 10-4seo-301-30 mAwuxL MANUAL 10-*901-6so-6* mAwu«L 23-*so4-61e-61 MANUAL _____27-*s04-66*-66 mAwu«L 29-*so4-7ee-72 ----'--� ' MANUAL 4*-4so+-801-8* m«wuAL - � ` ' ° /~ � 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -88 PAGE 11 CHECK_ NO._ DATE - AMOUN_T VENDOR ____. - - -_- _ITEM- DESCRIPT.ION____ ACCOUNT. NO._ _INV, M P.O. M MESSAGE 139279 05/25/88 10.79 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 802 -82 MANUAL 1392279 05/25/88 _. -. 801.80 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 801 -80 MANUAL 139279 05125188 801.80- JERRYS HARDWARE CORRECTION 40- 4540 - 801 -80 MANUAL 139279 05/25/88 11.58 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 40= 4540 - 801 -80 MANUAL ' 139279 _ 05/25/88123.38JERRYS_. HARDWARE SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 802 -80 MANUAL 139279 05/25/88 32.82 JERRYS HARDWARE _ _ SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 803- 80......_... MANUAL 1139279 05/25/88 5.99 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 40- 4540 - 807 -80 MANUAL ' 8,927..02. *... .._- r +rr* + ++ -CKS ' 139744 05/24/88 229.95 EUGENE DAVIS WEED NOTICE 10- 4201 - 600 -60 MANUAL 139744 05/24/88 27.00 EUGENE DAVIS MILEAGE 10- 4208- 600 -60 MANUAL ' - 256. 95 +.. _.. _._..... . rrrrrr + +r -CKS ` 144251 05/24/88 _)60 000. 00 -- - HRA EDINA ----DUE HRA - - 10- 1145- 000 -00 MANUAL ' 100,000.00 + - r ++ -CKS 145138,- ____.- .06/08/88 23.48- ED PHILLIPS MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 4.24- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 145138 06/08/88 .70- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL " 145138 06/08/88 - _..- - „_.._.- _,_._.... -.- .86 PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 10.72- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 7.80- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL ` 145138 06/08/88_ 21 .87- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 145138 06/08/68 2.01- ED PHILLIPS - - -- - -- - - -- - -- 50- 3710- 842 -84 - MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 13.51- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ” 145138 06/08/88_ 36.65- ..__________,ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 61.96- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 8.57- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL " 145138' 06/08/88 14.81- ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 145138 OG /08/ @B 3.82- ED PHILLIPS -- - - - -- -- - - 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 145138 06/08/•88 22.16- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL " 145138 _ ._- 06/08/89 1.,.174.45---- _ -_.ED PHILLIPS...._..--- _-........--- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- -- 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 390.20 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 1.45138 06/08/88 1,832.52 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL " 145138 06/08/88 - „_- 2,598.38 ED PHILLIPS - - - 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 740.60 ED PHILLIPS - - -- ------ - - - - -- - - -- 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 424.00 ED PHILLIPS S0- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145138. ..__ . 06/08/88 _____. -... _._-._.- .- .70.36 ___.____-ED PHILLIPS .- _.... -___ - . 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 1,072.75 ED PHILLIPS - _ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL j 145138 06/08/88 86.40- ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL ” 145138 06/ 08/88 _ 201.58 ED PHILLIPS - - 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 1 , 351 .70 ED PHILLIPS - - - - - - - -. --- - - - - -- - 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 2,187.55. ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL " 145138 06/08/88 ----- ......_.. _.___._...__857.65 ED PHILLIPS._ -- 50- 4628 - 862-86 MANUAL 145138 06/08/88 382.72 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL . 145138 06/08/88 2,216.15 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 15,192.77 + r + + + +r +r+ -CKS J 1988 OF EDINA CHECK_ NO.- - DATE___._________.__ ____- AMOUNT VENDOR 4 CHECK STER 05 -31 -8t ,GE 12 _ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. 0 MESSAGE I r 50 -3710- 003 -00 145190 - 05/24/88 __. .__..___._- .._.... 2.94- .___ - - - . -EAGLE WINE MANUAL INVENTORY _ MANUAL 145190 06/08/88 7.75- GRIGGS COOPER AND C �'. 145190 06/08/88 13.23- GRIGGS COOPER AND C MANUAL 145190 .- 06/08/88 _ .13 MANUAL COOPER AND C MANUAL r 145190 06/08/88 ______GRIGGS 5.81- GRIGGS COOPER AND C MANUAL 145190 06/08/88 4.58- GRIGGS COOPER AND C MANUAL 145190 06/08/88 9.58 - --------- _GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ MANUAL 145190 06/08/88 25.73- GRIGGS COOPER AND C - 145190 06/08/88 35.37- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 _ _ 6.11- AND C 145190 06/08/88 64.83- GRIGGS COOPER AND _ C T 145190 06/08/88 20.02- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 - 06/08/88 _- __.._ ...._,- _.,_.., . 7. 05- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 661.70 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 387.70 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 1,768.58______ GRIGGS_COOPER 'AND C 145190 06/08/88 305.34 GRIGGS COOPER AND C .� 145190 06/08/88 3,241.48 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 -- -_- 06/08/88._____._._....- 229. 09 ___- __ -_.___ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 13.30- GRIGGS COOPER AND ___ C �. 145190. 06/08/88 290.73 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 _ 06/08/88 478.95 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 1,286.55 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 69.18- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88._- _____,._.- ______4..33 -_- ____.GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 06/08/88 11000.92 GRIGGS COOPER AND C __ - �. 145190 06/08/88 352.33 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 145190 05/24/88 ______ __ 17.05_ EAGLE WINE 145190 05/24/88 71.69 _ EAGLE WINE _ __INVENTORY INVENTORY 145190 05/24/88 146.89 EAGLE WINE INVENTORY 145285 06/08/88 28.89- JOHNSON WINE �. 145285 06/08/88 425.82- JOHNSON WINE 145285 ., -- 06/08/88 _ _ _ 1.25 - WINE 14528 06/08/88 __JOHNSON 36.24- JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 36.60- JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 - 4.49- JOHNSON WINE 145255 -- 06/08/88 — 4.49 -- - JOHNSON WINE - - -- -- - - - - -- 145285 06/08/88 3.83- JOHNSON WINE 145285 _,. -.. 06/08/88 4..49 -JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 7.46- JOHNSON WINE .� 145285 06/08/88 11.63- JOHNSON WINE 14528506 /08/88 _ 91.87- JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 _ b.63- JOHNSON WINE -- 145285 06/08/88 6.63 JOHNSON WINE 145285 ------- 06/08/88 _ 2. 00 WINE 145255 06/08/88 ______JOHNSON 2.00- JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 1.68 JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 .02 JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 1.68 _ JOHNSON WINE 145285 06/08/88 6.63- JOHNSON WINE r 50 -3710- 003 -00 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82. MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 "- -- MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 371.0- 842 -84 - MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 _ MANUAL _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 _ MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL r 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL - _ 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 5074628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84- - MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4632- 822 -82 _ MANUAL 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL 50-4632- 862 -86 MANUAL * * * -CKS 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL - -50 -3710- 822 -82 - MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86_ MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL - 50 -3710- 862 -86 - MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 =88 PAGE 13 (- CHECK N0._ DATE ._AMOUNT VENDOR -_ ITEM DESCRIPTION -__ _ACCOUNT -NO. .INV. N P.O. 8 MESSAGE 145285 06/08/88 1.68- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 5.20 -. JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 103.87- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1452285 06/08/88 1,829.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL " 145285 06/08/88 5.95. JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 23.80 JOHNSON WINE _ 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 4,593.59 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL " 145285 06/08/88 84.03- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 84.03 JOHNSON _ WINE .. -__._ 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 23.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL - 145285 06/08/88 _,- _.. 5,193.83 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 84.03- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL .' 145EEE85 06 /08/88 9.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 383.09 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 9.45 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL - 145285 .., -.. 06/08/88 - -___ _- _448.92 -_ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145E2285 06/08/88 3.85 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82, MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 448.92 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL " 145285 06/OA/88 - - 9.45 - ____JOHNSON WINE _- _ _. 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 448.92 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 5.61- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL " 145285 _ 06/08/88 _ 00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 744.78 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 7.35 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 -- _ _- . 154.40- JOHNSON WINE _- __ - __ -____ 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 25.20 JOHNSON WINE - __.. 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 00_ - _JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 1,165.90 JOHNSON _ WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 664.60 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL " 145285 06/08/88 - _ __._. -_- 14.70 -_ _- JOHNSON WINE _,. _ _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 14.70 JOHNSON WINE _ _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 2.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL " 145285 06/08/88 _ 2.35- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 14.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 520.33 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL " 145285 06/08/88 - 4.90___..__JOHNSON WINE _ - _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 145285 06/08/88 664.60- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 145285 06/08/88 664.60 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL " 145285 -_ 06/08/88 2.35 WINE _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 14,655.47 - - rrrrrrt rrr -CKS -. 145311 06/08/88 5.00- EASTSIDE BEVERAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145311 _.___._ _06/08/8.8- - ___________ -89.75 -___ EASTSIDE BEVERAGE _ 4628_- 842 -84 MANUAL 84.75 r ___50-4628-84.2-84 _---50- rrrrrtr rrr -CKS 145433 06/08/88 3.00 PAUSTIS d SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145433 06/08/88 96.00 PAUSTIS & SONS- 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145433 05/24/88 353.28 PAUSTIS ______ ___ d SONS INVENTORY _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 145433 05/24/88 48.00 PAUSTIS d SONS INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 MANUAL 1988 I OF EDINA CHECK 'STER 05 -31- 8! AGE 14 CHECK NO.. DATE __ _VENDOR_ _.__-_---ITEM DESCRIPTION — ACCOUNT NO, INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 500.28 * �. 7,638.56 r rrr * * * — - - - -- --- - - - - -- - -- -- 148430 -_ 06/08/88 _ ....... 22,691.63 PERA 22,691 .63 148442 06/07/88 12,939.07 PHP CITIY CONT PHP * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL *** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL * ** -CKS 145451 06/08/88 QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 5.72- QUALITY WINE _ _ 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 10.45- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 __- .._... ..59.62 - __.___._...QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 1.48- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 7.85- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 2.14- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 73.05- QUALITY WINE _ - _ — _ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL `. 145451 06/08/88 429.93 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 2,981.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 3,652.33 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 571.05 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 145451 _ 06/08/88 —_ QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 114.76- QUALITY WINE — 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 147.50 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 _ _- ._ -._ 783.15 .._- _,-- __- ,._— .._QUALITY WINE _.- ...___ -- 4628-862-86 MANUAL 145451 06/08/88 214.25 QUALITY WINE _ --..__ ..--- __— _ - -50- 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 9,538.73 r ** *-CKS 145302 05/24/88 --------- ____ - 150.00. JOHN_KEPRIOS__ _ -__ _ ___ REGISTRATION_ 10 -3500- 000 -00 MANUAL 150.00 _— — 145803 .- 05/24/88 _ 1,646.00 STERNER LIGHTING — -_ R PARTS 10- 4540- 322 -30 MANUAL 1,646.00 - r * *ws* * ** -CKS 147864 06/08/88 21000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL -- - - -- - -- 2,_000.00 r * ** -CKS 148091 06/07/8$ 119,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL %148091 06/07/88 119,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL * ** -CKS 148198 06/07/88 7,638.56 GROUP HEALTH CITY CONT G HEALTH - 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL �. 7,638.56 r rrr * * * — - - - -- --- - - - - -- - -- -- 148430 -_ 06/08/88 _ ....... 22,691.63 PERA 22,691 .63 148442 06/07/88 12,939.07 PHP CITIY CONT PHP * ** -CKS 10- 4145 - 510 -51 MANUAL *** -CKS 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL i 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK 05 -31 -88 PAGE 15 ' REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE _ _ AMOUNT _. _ VENDOR ITEM_ DESCRIPTION____ ____ACCOUNT. NO-... INV. __ M P.O. N MESSAGE - 12,939.07 • • *• + *• _._. - - ••• -CKS 148506 06/08/88 1 3, 137.79 ..__ FIDELITY FICA 1 0- 4149 -51 0 -51 MANUAL X148506 06/08/88 404.66 FIDELITY HK CONT 10 -4162- 510 -51 _ MANUAL 13,542.45 • ••s•�s ••• -CKS 148876 _ 06/07/88 -_. -_ __.- ______.__ -, 401 . 40.__________._COMM_L.IF_E,_INS _. C_ITYLIFEINS 1 4157- 510 -51- MANUAL 401.40 • _ -0- ••• +ar -- ••• —CKS 152091 06/07/88 17,362.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 152091 _- _ 06/07/88 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 1152091 06/08/88 34,724.00 CITY OF EDINA CORRECTION 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL 152091 06/08/88 17,362.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 17,362. 00 • - - ...__ -..__- - �. •• * + +» ••• -CKS 152138 06/08/88 9.95- ED PHILLIPS S6- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 1.45- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 _.. 17.77- .. ED PHILLIPS __. _ 50-3710-822-82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 8.29- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 82.05- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 _ -- 06/08/88___- _,_10.32- _ED_PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 7.00- ED PHILLIPS _ _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 8.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 --------- 6.86- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 113.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 19.77 ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 -_ 06/08/88_ _ -_____ 2.26- ED PHILLIPS_ 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 19.77- ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 113.71- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 __- - .19.77- ED PHILLIPS _ __.. 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 113.71 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL ti 152138 06/08/88 497.91 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88______ ____4,102.89_ ED PHILLIPS _ 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 350.40 ED PHILLIPS _ 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 5,614.60 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 - - 06/08/885,614.60.— __- ,____ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 5,614.60— ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 4 I 152138 06/08/88 829.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 _ ._ 06/08/88 1,777.25 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 145.12 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 871.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138. 06/08/88 1,032.50 ED PHILLIPS . 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 104.75 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 1,977.85 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152138._ _06/08/88- 1,_977.85- ED PHILLIPS — 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 686.80 ED PHILLIPS _ 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 152138 06/08/88 226.40 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 1988 OF EDINA 49.75 -_ JOHNSON CHECK 152285 ISTER - _- 4.48- JOHNSON WINE - 15222285 06/08/88 10.92- JOHNSON WINE 152 ^285 _- 06/08/88 _ .48-.__ 05 -31-8 AGE 16 CHECK NQ.- DATE_.- ._,_.. _ AMOUNT_.__ _ VENDOR -- .....JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE 15222285 _ -_ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE _ \ 152138 06/08/88 1,977.85 ED PHILLIPS JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 16.46 - JOHNSON 152138 06/07/88 _.._.._ 27.90 ED PHILLIPS - WINE 152285 COSS GS BEER._ 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4630- 822 -82 MANUAL 152138 X152138 06/07/88 06/07/88 69.15 ED PHILLIP5 -__ JOHNSON WINE • 152285 __.- - .. COSS GS BEER 50 -4630- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL _ 152285 138.00 ED PHILLIPS JOHNSON WINE 152285 COSS GS BEER 50- 4630- 862 -86 MANUAL WINE 152285 18 , 164. 13 2,487.22 JOHNSON WINE - * ** -CKS 152190 152190 06/08/88 06/08/88 3.01- GRIGGS COOPER AND C - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- 50- 3710 - 822 -82 - MANUAL - 152190 06/08/88 25.14- 11.36 - GRIGGS GRIGGS COOPER COOPER AND AND C C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 - -- 3.01 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL _ _ - 152190 06/08/88 3.01- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 _ 54.92 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 19.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C _._ - - -- - - - --50 -3710- 842 -84 _.. -__ MANUAL _ 152190 06/08/88 8.77- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 -- 06/08/88 7,75 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 - 18.07- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 152190 06/08/88 80.59- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152190 .06/08/88 _- _....._._ 96- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL X152190 O6 /08/88 .4. ___,- ______ 1,256.82 -- GRIGGS COOPER AND C ______. -._ _ - ____._ 50-3710-862-86 MANUAL _ 152190 06/08/88 2,745.98 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 387.70 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 - _ _ - 4,029.60 - GRIGGS COOPER AND C - - _ SO- 4626- 842 -84_ MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 150.60 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 150.60- GRIGGS COOPER AND C SO- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 568.24 GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ - -- --- - - - - -- - - -- 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _ MANUAL 152p90 06/08/88 132.01 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 18.33- COOPER AND C__ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88. 438.73 __GRIGGS GRIGGS COOPER AND C - 50- 4628- 842 -84 -- MANUAL -- - 152190 06/08/88 959.82' GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 - ._ -_ -_ 06/08/88 16,41- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 903.70 GRIGGS COOPER AND C - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- - -_- 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152190 06/08/88 248.14 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152190 -___- 06/07/88. -_ _ _ 16.56 GRIGGS COOPER COST GS MIX 50- 4628- 862 -86 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 152190 06/07/88 56.15 GRIGGS COOPER - - -. -COST GS MIX -- -- 50- 4632- 842 -84 MANUAL MANUAL 11,474.94 • r * ** -CKS _50-3710-822-82 06/08/88___ 49.75 -_ JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 - _- 4.48- JOHNSON WINE - 15222285 06/08/88 10.92- JOHNSON WINE 152 ^285 _- 06/08/88 _ .48-.__ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 WINE 152285 06/08/88 -- 16.84- -- .....JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE 15222285 06/08/88 112.65- JOHNSON WINE 15222 ^85 06/08/88___ 1 . 08.- JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 16.46 - JOHNSON WINE _ _ 152285 06/08/88 160.90 JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 :_ ----- _ 8.96- JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 _- ____ 160.90- -__ JOHNSON WINE • 152285 06/08/88 - 9.19- JOHNSON WINE 152285 _ 06/08/88 - 160.90- JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 11.55 __ JOHNSON WINE 152285 06/08/88 2,487.22 JOHNSON WINE r * ** -CKS _50-3710-822-82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -3710- 822 -82 MANUAL _____S0- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL - 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842 -84 .__..__.____- MANUAL 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL SO- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 - - MANUAL SO- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL .� ..'^ . � yao u�ry op so�w* 15e311.1 0a/o4/am__--__-__-_I cxc� s nsmIwTcn 05-31 -818 p�ns �r | ' � c*soxwo.m^Ts ow*LzrY '~ UNT VENDOR ITEM INV. / 0 p`n.wMESSAGE -- ---- \. |seeas oa/on/ae � 23 .45 JOHNSON ""� u�ws 50-46e6-8*2-84 mxwoAL ' .�` Isaaos oo/vo/ao ' _- 5.a3e.4* __-JOHNSON u/wc - '---�--------- --- wu1se2os �� oa/oa/oo e , o4s ' pa onxwoow u�ws 50-4626-86e-86 mAwo*L Ise2ns ' oo/on/on 31.85 Jnxwoom uIws so-+aea-oae-na MANUAL 1seeas o6/0n/88 y 10 �oxwoow w�ws ---'—' ----------------------------------------- 50-46e8-8ee-8e nAwo*L Iseeos oo/oo/oo 1' 094.46 «nxwoow wzws sv-+»eu-oea-oe ---- '-_-'- - ' MANUAL 15228s oa/oa/eo 1.0s JOHNSON ' WINE 50-46e8-8ee-82 nxwuAL Iseeas oa/oo/aa '` 0 Jo*wuow wws - --^ MANUAL 1522,95 oo/oa/aa 129s Jo*wauw wzws __-s»-*aew-uee-me s»-�aum-uea-�a mxwo�� ' �se�»s »«/»a/eo � *�y ey �o*wuuw uzws 50-*6e8-eee-8e m»woxL . Iseaos oa/oa/ao__-____*a'*sJOHNSON wIws e0-46e8-8e2-ee MANUAL Iseuos oa/oa/ae .3s Jo*waow uIwE--'--�----------'-----�--_-----�n��aaa-oee-me--- - m�wo�� e, 15ee85 oa/oo/ea 18.55 Juxwaow uzws ` su-�aeo-e�e-ow m�wox� / 15ee8s oo,on/on ' _- 1'o*r�as �oowaowu�ms ---'--------------------so-*aeo-w*a-n4 mAwo»L 15228s ou/vn/nn sa .*o xoxwoow u�ms 50-4628-84e-84 ' MANUAL Isezas oo/on/eo 108.es xoxwaow uIws so-*628-e42-84 MANUAL ' � Isaaos 06/08/88 156.38- -----JOHNSON Jnxmonw wIws -'-----------------'------------sm-«oao-m4a-w* sn-4aca-e*e-ny MANUAL 15e285 oo/oa>nn 1.7s WINE ' - - MANUAL u 152285 va/oo/aa .07 xu*wauw wIws 8 MANUAL /szaas ' 06/08/88 -- -__'_1, '68* 920. _JOHNSON -'---'�--------' MANUAL 152e8s voron/an 1.0s «o*mSnw wIws -sn-4«ew-wao-ma --'-- MANUAL w 152285 va/oo/ao n ^ o*s .ye- Joxwaow wIws sn-*aco-nac-ea MANUAL- 152285 06/08/88 ao'oo _�-�--�-'joxmonw'uIws-�--- JOHNSON uzws so-4aee-oae-o6 m^woAL �saans oa/on/ao .00 '�-'-----------so-4aae-oae-ua mAwu«L � 15ee85 06/08/88 wy7'*e uo*woom uIws s»-*aea-oas-ma mAmo«L Isaeas 06/08/88 �owwuuw uzws � . So-*aew-uoe-e6 m»wuAL �seuos oo'on/oo ^°"~S"~ °^"= so-*aeo-eoc-oa mAwo«L 152e8s oo/on/aa 31.e5_ °°"°""° W^"= so-*aew-oac-ua MANUAL Is2a8s ---_06_/08_/8..8- 8,04S.9e ---��e^a4a.na'�----- -�ux��Pw - -------'------�--'-�--'-�-------_---------- mxwoAL ' ------' ' Sr es.es p*uaTIa u aowa 7e.00 p*uwrzo woNn cooT wm MIX __----97. _______� 1 .14- oux��ry uzms 50-3710-822-82. 50-37 to-aee-oe 50-3710-842-84 - 5*-3710-642-84 ***-cwo 50-3710-84e-84 m*wuAL 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL � 10-*1sa-sIo-51 -----sw-46?8-842-84 � 50-463e-8*e-8* ----'--------'----' *5.2e- ___ QUALITY �0 15e311 oa/oa/ea 10.00- a«aTuIos osysnAos 15e311.1 0a/o4/am__--__-__-_I as. » gs- BEVERAGE 63.40 --____- 115. 06 * ��-------------- � 17.37- ow*LzrY -_-_--_--'_-___.__.. �. .!o ` \15e368 oa/oo*yo e.*e0.e3 muTu*L oswsFzT DISABILITY '-- 06/08/e8 /* es.es p*uaTIa u aowa 7e.00 p*uwrzo woNn cooT wm MIX __----97. _______� 1 .14- oux��ry uzms 50-3710-822-82. 50-37 to-aee-oe 50-3710-842-84 - 5*-3710-642-84 ***-cwo 50-3710-84e-84 m*wuAL 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL � 10-*1sa-sIo-51 -----sw-46?8-842-84 � 50-463e-8*e-8* ----'--------'----' *5.2e- ___ QUALITY __ uzws _ 6.11- --------muALzTr lIse433 oa/oa/ea -- — 63.40 `Isaoso oa/or/nn 17.37- ow*LzrY wIws ' Ise4s1 '-- 06/08/e8 /* Isa*sI oa/oa/eo ` Ise*sv oa/oa/aa_____�_ / Isa*sI 06/08,88 ` .�` vse*sI 06/08/88 es.es p*uaTIa u aowa 7e.00 p*uwrzo woNn cooT wm MIX __----97. _______� 1 .14- oux��ry uzms 50-3710-822-82. 50-37 to-aee-oe 50-3710-842-84 - 5*-3710-642-84 ***-cwo 50-3710-84e-84 m*wuAL 50-4628-842-84 MANUAL � 10-*1sa-sIo-51 -----sw-46?8-842-84 � 50-463e-8*e-8* ----'--------'----' *5.2e- ___ QUALITY __ uzws _ 6.11- --------muALzTr QUALITY wIws 63.40 uIms --------- 17.37- ow*LzrY wIws ***-cwo MANUAL ***-cww m«wuAL MANUAL ***-cKa MANUAL m^wo«L MANUAL MANUAL nAwo*L 1988 r OF EDINA CHECK �STER 05 -31_8• ` 'GE 18 CHEC. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR - __ITEM DESCRIPTION_ — ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. USAGE I _ 152451 06/08/88 1.70- QUALITY WINE 50 -3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 42.04- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 7.52- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 2,261.24 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 4,169.45 WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 2,101.23 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 113.90 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 _. 610.30_.-- _ -__ -- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 1,733.85 QUALITY WINE _._., 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88 748.00 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 152451 06/08/88__ 169.50 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 11,702.97 - rrrr ** * ** -CKS 152514 06/08/88 60.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL - - - - -- -- - - - — - 6 0.. 0 0 - *- -- - - -- r *r -CKS 153918 06/07/88 11914.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1,914.00 * ** -CKS 154700 06/07/88 11850.00 CITY OF EDINA REHAB TRANSFER 10- 1139 - 000 -00 MANUAL 1,850.00 * - rr* -CKS 155701 06/07/88 50.00 ED MACHOLDA PETTY CASH 26- 1030 - 000 -00 MANUAL 155701 06/07/88 ___,_ ........ 140.00 ED_ MACHOLDA CASH REG__ _ 26- 1040 - 000 -00 MANUAL 190.00 * _. _ - - -_ _ _... - - - --------- - - - - -- - -- .._ _.... - - -__ ..... __._ _- - - _ _ _ ------- - - - -.. ._ ...... .... ....... srr -CKS 158415 06/08/88 9,350.38 MED CENTERS HOSPITALIZATION 10- 4156- 510 -51 MANUAL rr +r�r * ** -CKS 159745 06/08 /88 50.00 COLLEEN PAULUS ANNUAL 10- 4202 - 480 -48 MANUAL ` 50.00 *rrrrr _ **r -CKS _ 425,082.15 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 1,408.23 426.82 FUND 23 TOTAL - - ART CENTER - - - - -- t ed -_ -��i �iru ���� thru 84919 FUND 26 TOTAL- SWIMMING POOL FUND-- 7 Afi l-- 'l - -. - -• ;ri,r 12,247.36 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND S'909.10 - -- .,___ -___- 672.84 FUND 28 TOTAL FUND 29 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER-FUND. GUN RANGE FUND 9,745.47 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK Fr,• - 21,471.88 283,002.84 FUND 40 TOTAL FUND 50 TOTAL UTILITY FUND LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND -- -- - - --- 290.00 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND CiTV . 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 05 -31 -88 PAGE 19 j CHECK NO.. DATE --.--..-----.----AMOUNT VEND.OR ITEM _DESCRI_PTION ACCOUNT___N_O._ _INV._ N P.O. N MESSAGE 760,256.69 .. __. .TOTAL �N ,y W _