HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988-07-18_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
JULY 18, 1988
ROLLCALL
EDINA__MASONIC LODGE PRESENTATION - Donald Thorud and Bob-Soelberg
I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *)
and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one
motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council.
Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the
consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
* II. APP &OVAL OF MINUTES of the Regular Meeting of July11, 1988.
III. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed,, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4/5 favorable vote required if
no petition.
A. Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb and Gutter Improvement No P -BA -282
Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills Addition
B. Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb and Gutter Improvement No P -BA -284.
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable
rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development
Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass. .
A. Informal Presentation (No action required) - Center Companies - Southdale
Center Expansion
V. ORDINANCES. First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second
Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all members of Council required
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members
of Council required.to pass.
A. First Reading
1. .Ordinance No. 406 -A5 - Requiring Exterior Completion of One and Two
Family Residential Units Within 12 Months of Issuance of Permit
2. Ordinance No. 1011 -A1 - Regulating the Possession, Purchase or
Delivery of Controlled Substances and Providing a Penalty
VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
Edina City Council Agenda
July 18, 1988
Page 2
VII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of July 12, 1988
B. Proposed Sewer/Water Rates
C. CASH Board Nomination
D. Appointment of School Representatives to Human Relations Commission
E. Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act Summary
F. H.O.H.E. Agreement
G. Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Beer License - Church of St. Patrick's
IX: SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS
XI. FINANCE
A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 7/18/88: General Fund $70,366.21,
Art Center $1,872.70, Capital Fund $57,372.89, Swimming Pool Fund
$1,793.01, Golf Course Fund $14,259.19, Recreation Center Fund $41,803.49,
Gun Range Fund $74.20, Edinborough Park $5,533.07, Utility Fund
$24,821.35, Liquor Dispensary Fund $137,996.25, Construction Fund
$33,202.44, Total $389,094.80
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /EVENTS
Mon Aug 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 p.m. Council Room
Mon Aug_ 15 Regular Council Meeting
Tues Sept 6 First Budget Hearing
Thur .Sept 8 Budget Hearing.
Mon Sept 12 Regular Council Meeting
Thur Sept 15 Budget Hearing
Mon Sept 19 Regular Council Meeting
7:00 p.m. Council Room
4:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room
4:30 p.m.. Mgrs Conf Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
4 :30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room
7:00 p.m. Council Room
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 11, 1988
Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney.
CENTENNIAL UPDATE GIVEN. Kay Bach, Co -Chair of the 1988 Centennial, presented an
update on Centennial activities. She reported that the events for the month June
revolved around an Arts, Flowers and Fashions Festival, but also included
Edinanite at the Twins on June 21 and the Centennial Run on June 26. The month of
July began with the All -Class Edina High School Reunion and All -Class Band Reunion
events and the city -wide Neighborhood Block Parties. The Centennial Celebration
of July 4th began with the 10 a.m. Parade on 50th Street and continued with
afternoon events at Lake Cornelia.Park, the John Philip Sousa Memorial Band and .a
spectacular fireworks display at dusk. She showed photographs taken during the
June and July.events and reported that the turnouts for the High School Reunion,
(estimated 2,500 to 3,000 alumni present) the All- Class Band Reunion and the
Parade were fantastic. The main event for August will be the Golf Tournament on
August 8.
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE ADOPTED FOR CLINTON J. CHRISTOPHER. Mayor. Courtney read
the following resolution of condolence which was unanimously adopted:.
RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE
WHEREAS, Clinton J. Christopher was a long time resident of the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, he was held in high esteem by all who knew him for his many civic
interests and his efforts in serving his community; and.
WHEREAS, in 1939 he was one of the founders of St. Stephen's Episcopal Church in
Edina; and
WHEREAS, he served as President of the Edina Country Club in 1953; and
WHEREAS, he was appointed by Governor Luther.Youngdahl as advisory commissioner of
the Minnesota Department of Business Development and held that position under four
governors; and
WHEREAS, he was elected President of the Edina Village Council and served during
the post World War II years of 1946 through 1947 when Edina began its building
boom;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council does hereby mourn the
passing of
CLINTON J. CHRISTOPHER
and extends its condolences to his son and daughters, to his grandchildren and
great grandchildren..
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution be entered into the Minutes Book of
the Edina City.Council and that a copy be presented to his family.
ADOPTED this 11th day of July, 1988.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Notion was made by Member Smith and seconded by
Member Kelly to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Smith Turner, Richards, Courtney
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JUNE 20 AND SPECIAL MEETINGS OF MAY 16 AND JUNE 6...1988
APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to
approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting and Special Meetings of May 16.and June
6, 1988.
Motion carried on rollcall.vote, five ayes.
*LOT D_IVISION APPROVED FOR LOTS 15. 16 AND 17 BLOCK 2. BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS (5037
WILLIAM AVENUE) - HEARING DATE SET - 8/1/88 Notion was made by Member Smith and
seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lots 15, 16 and 17, Block 2, BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS; and
WHEREAS, the owners:of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 17 and the -North one half of Lot 16, Block 2, " BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS ",
including that portion of the west one half of the vacated alley adjoining
which lies between the easterly extension of the north line of said Lot 17
and the south line of the North one half of said Lot 16;
and
Lot 15 and the South one half of Lot 16, Block 2, " BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS ",
including that portion of the west one half of the vacated alley adjoining
which lies between the.easterly extension of the south line of.said Lot 15
and the north line of the south one half of said Lot 16.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and.Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will.create an unnecessary.hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance
Nos. 801 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and
Ordinance No-. 825, are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be approved for by those ordinances.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR INTERCOM ALERT SYSTEM. Motion was made by Member Smith and
seconded by Member Kelly for award of bid for a Fire Department Intercom Alert
System to recommended sole bidder, Executone of Minneapolis, at $5,995.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE (1) TON TRUCK. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded
by Member Kelly for award of bid for Public Works /Street Department one (1) ton
truck to recommended low bidder, Superior Ford, Inc., -at $12,689.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY PURCHASE OF WELL SCREEN (WELL #4). Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to approve Emergency Purchase of Well
Screen (Well #4) from Layne Minnesota at $9,095.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR EMERGENCY REPAIR OF FIRE TRUCK (AERIAL TOWER). Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to approve Emergency Repair of Fire
Truck (Aerial Tower) from Custom Fire, Inc. at $6,339.10.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWAL APPROVED - VIE DE FRANCE RESTAURANT. Motion was made
by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to approve the On -Sale Wine License
Renewal for Vie de France Restaurant.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
1988 -1989 WORK PROGRAM ADOPTED. Manager Rosland presented the proposed 1988 -1989
Work Program advising that it had been revised in accordance with the Council's
directive of June 20, 1988. He said staff feels that the issues can be
accomplished within the suggested timeframes. Member Turner questioned the lack
of a timetable for Issue #4 - How can Edina maintain its high - quality living and
working environment in light of the effects of increased urbanization especially
traffic related impacts? She suggested that the Council set some dates for
dealing with travel demand management in the event the Hedberg development does
not come to fruition. She added that the whole I -494 Corridor Study has
"- implications for the City for the next 10 -20 years. Member Smith commented that
with regard to Issue #5 - How will Edina comply with mandates imposed by Hennepin
County regarding the diversion of recyclables from the solid waste stream? - that
we would meet or exceed our goal of diverting 39% of the city -wide solid waste
stream through recycling for calendar year 1992 as mandated by Hennepin County.
Manager Rosland said that the Recycling Commission is working very hard on this
issue and would have some proposals for the 1989 Budget hearings. Member Turner
moved approval of the 1988 -1989 Work Program as presented with the addition of a
September 1, 1989 date on Issue #4. Motion was seconded by Member Smith.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
REPORT GIVEN ON PROPOSED_ ORDINANCE REGULATING EXTERIOR COMPLETION OF ONE AND TWO
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS. Manager Rosland recalled that at Council Meeting of
June 20, 1988 the Council had discussed the issue raised by a resident for a one
year limit for exterior completion of residential projects and had directed staff
to bring this to the Building Construction Appeals Board and the Community
Development and Planning Commission for their recommendation. He reported that
both organizations agreed that such an ordinance should be adopted. The City
Attorney has been instructed to prepare a draft ordinance for the Council's
review. No formal action was taken.
DR. RICHARD COHAN APPOINTED TO COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
Mayor Courtney stated that following the interviews held prior to the Council
Meeting and upon nominations of the Council he would recommend that Dr. Richards
Cohan be appointed to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee to fill the
un- expired term resulting from the resignation of Theresa Perrone. Motion was
made by Member Kelly for consent of the Mayor's appointment of Dr. Richard Cohan
to the Community Health Services Advisory Committee to fill an un- expired term to
.2/1/90. Motion was seconded by Member Turner.
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Motion carried.
WELL WATER REPORT PRESENTED. Manager Rosland directed the Council's attention to
a memorandum prepared by Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works, which reported on
the water usage in the City of Edina during the current drought. The report noted
that during the month of June, 1988 the average gallon per capita consumption was
approximately 450 gallons. This meant the City well system was pumping virtually
non -stop for the month of June. During the non -stop pumping scenario, four of the
seventeen wells draw down on the aquifer was severe enough to cause loss of
pumping ability. Pumping capacity was restored by adding length to each well;
this is not a normal circumstance during any previous year, including the dry
months of 1987. The pumping total for June was in excess of 593,000,000 gallons.
The 1987 June per capita use of 346 gallons was considered excessive. The June
1988 'rate of 450 gallons per capita suggests that more conservation is needed.
The current ban with staff enforcement has worked for most days. However, there
have been four mornings where the water pressure was critically low in the higher
elevations of the City. The recent rain brought a small reprieve to the system
which allowed some much needed maintenance on the equipment. A major problem has
developed with Well #4 due to sand being pumped up from the aquifer. Repairs are
being made and the well should be back on line soon. If Well #4 works properly, a
small margin of capacity should be available so that maintenance can be performed
on other wells. The report concluded that the current sprinkling ban will work if
the residents and businesses understand that the tremendous amount of water being
pumped needs to be applied carefully and that more conservation efforts should be
promoted. Manager Rosland briefly reported on the enforcement of the sprinkling
ban and commended the staff involved for their efforts in enforcing the ban. He
added that a brochure will be provided to each resident regarding the ban and
reasons why the water system must be managed. No formal action was taken.
FEASIBILITY REPORT APPROVED FOR PERMANENT STREET SURFACING AND CURB & GUTTER
P -BA -282 (APACHE ROAD AND INDIAN WAY WEST /INDIAN HILLS ADDITION AND P -BA -284
(MINNESOTA DRIVE): PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR 7/18/88. Motion was made by Member
Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT STREET SURFACING
AND CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NOS. P -BA -282 and P -BA -284
1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to
the feasibility of the following proposed improvements:
Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb and Gutter Improvement No. P -BA -282
Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills Addition
Permanent Street Surfacing and Curb and Gutter Improvement No. P -BA -282'
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough Way
and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved
and directed.to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2. This Council shall meet on Monday, July 18, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina
City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in
said improvements.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
BIDS TO BE TAKEN FOR PERMANENT STREET - SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO: P -BA=282. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member
Kelly to adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -282
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA;
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore - prepared by the City Engineer
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for the improvement:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
CONTRACT #88 -5 (ENG)
IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -282
BIDS CLOSE AUGUST 11, 1988
SEALED BIDS will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City
Hall, 4801 West 50th Street at 11:00 A.M., Thursday, August 11, 1988. The Edina
City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, August 15, 1988 to consider said
bids. The following are approximate major quantities:
219 Tons MDOT 2331 Base
164 Tons MDOT 3341 Wear
264 LF B6 -18 Curb & Gutter
1,176 LF Drive Over Curb & Gutter
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon showing the work
covered by the bid-. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 West -50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
y-
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them
may be returned unopened.
York must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office .
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check). Said deposit to be returned upon return of the plans and
specifications with a bona fide.bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and
accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the
amount of at least ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose .
separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED TO LEVY SANITARY SEWERNATERMAIN CONNECTION CHARGES FOR LOT 2
BLOCK 1. SMABY ADDITION (5424 GROVE STREET). Motion was made by Member Smith and
seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby authorize the assessment of
the connection charge for Sanitary Sever No. 206 in the amount of $764.72 and the
connection charge for Watermaiu Lateral No. 127 in the amount of $607.86 for a
total of $1,372.56 to be levied against Lot 2, Block 1, SMABY ADDITION (PIN
32- 117- 21 -14- 0060),.5424 Grove Street, payable over a period of six (6) years, the
first payment collectible with real estate taxes payable in 1989, and with
interest on the entire assessment at the rate of 7.5% per annum.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED CHANGING POLLING LOCATION FOR PRECINCT 18. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
polling place for Precinct 18 in the City of Edina be changed from Lutheran Church
of the Master, 7128 France Avenue South to Edinborough Park, 7700 York Avenue
South.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*FINAL PLAT RESOLUTION REVISED FOR ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION. Motion was made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plan entitled " ENGSTROM MARNIE ADDITION ", platted by Ronald A. Zamansky
and Lynn L. Zamansky, his wife, Bahram Mozayeny and Minoo Nozayeny, husband and
wife, Richard J. Krentz and Patricia A. Krentz, husband and wife, and William W.
Krentz, single, and Eugene S. Hauser and Georgia Hauser, husband and wife, and
presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of December 21, 1988 be and
is hereby granted final approval.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED: RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING TRANSFER OF THE CITY'S
CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE. Manager Rosland recalled that at the meeting of May
16, 1988 he had advised the Council that Rogers Communications, Inc. had announced
the sale of their United States cable systems. In order to permit the transfer of
the franchise to a new Grantee the Council set a hearing date of July 11, 1988 and
authorized and directed that notice be published. He recommended adoption of a
resolution granting final approval to transfer of the franchise and amendment of
the Cable Television Ordinance to change the name of the Grantee. The operating
committee of the SWSCC recommends approval of the transfer. Manager Rosland
informed the Council that the SWSCC Operating Committee is trying to negotiate a
cash settlement of $3- 4,000,000 -plus recovering franchise fees because the
Commission feels strongly that the company has benefited from the Relief Ordinance
adopted by the franchise cities in 1985. No public comment being heard, Member
Turner moved adoption of the following resolution: -
RESOLUTION GIVING FINAL APPROVAL TO
A TRANSFER OF THE CITY'S CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISE
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City) has granted a cable television
franchise (the "Franchise ") to Rogers Cablesystems of Minnesota Limited
Partnership ( "RCMLP ") pursuant to City's cable communications ordinance (the
"Franchise Ordinance "); and
WHEREAS, Rogers Cablesystems of the Southwest Inc. ( "RCTSI ")is the sole general
partner of RCMLP and is a wholly -owned subsidiary of Rogers U.S.Cablesystems, Inc.
( "RUSCI "), which is a wholly -owned subsidiary ofRogers Cablesystems of America,
Inc. ( "RCA ") (collectively called herein the "Rogers Companies "); and
WHEREAS, the Rogers Companies have acquired all the limited partnership interests
in RCMLP; and
WHEREAS, there is no need for RCMLP to,operate the Franchise now that the Rogers
Companies has acquired all the limited partnership interests in RCMLP; and
1 /
WHEREAS, the Rogers Companies seeks to dissolve the RCMLP limited partnership and
transfer the Franchise-to the general partner, RCTSI; and
WHEREAS, the proposed transfer will not cause a change in the controlling :interest
in,.or a change in the operation of, the Franchise, because RCTSI :is:2. he',,general
partner of RCMLP; and
WHEREAS, the proposed transfer has been reviewed and discussed by the Operating
Committee of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission ( "SWSCC ") which.has."forwarded
the proposed transfer to the City with a recommendation for approval;sand
AREAS, it appears that the proposed transfer will be in the general public
interest and will not adversely affect subscribers to the City•s, cable system .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
A. The City hereby consents to and approves the transfer of the Franchise from
RCMLP to RCTSI and - the dissolution of RCMLP; such consent and approval is
conditioned on (i) the filing by RCTSI of a written Acceptance Agreement
( "Acceptance ") in a form and substance acceptable to the City and containing the
requirements set forth in Article %IV, Section 2 and Article %II, Section l of the
Franchise Ordinance whereby RCTSI agrees to assume, perform, and discharge those
obligations and duties of RCMLP in the Franchise Ordinance, including an opinion
of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents, as required by said-Article %IV,
(ii) the adoption of a similar resolution by all of the cities of Eden Prairie,.
.Hopkins, Minnetonka and Richfield within 90 days after adoption of this
resolution, and (iii) the filing of all of the documents required at (i) above
within 30 days after the last date of adoption of a similar resolution by all of
the cities listed at (ii) above.
B. The .City declares as of.the time of this.Resolution that the Franchise and all
agreements entered into by RCMLP are deemed in full force and effect and will
remain unchanged..by the transfer; except.that RCTSI will replace and be
responsible as the successor in interest to all obligations and rights held
formerly by RCMLP.
C. The-City notes that Section 6, subdivision 2, of the 1985 Relief Ordinance
provides for automatic termination of the relief therein when the Grantee collects
one hundred million dollars ($100,000,000) as measured from September 1, 1984, in .
gross revenue. The City intends that the Relief Ordinance will terminate pursuant
to said subdivision only if gross revenues exceed one hundred million dollars
($100,000,000), from the franchises held by RCTSI in the cities of Edina, Hopkins,
Eden Prairie, Richfield'and Minnetonka, irrespective of revenues received from all
other franchises held, owned, or operated by RCTSI. This statement of intent does.
not affect any other subdivisions of said Section 6.
Passed and adopted this 11th day of July, 1988, by the City of Edina.
CITY OF EDINA
By
Its Mayor
ATTEST: By
Its.Manager
City Clerk
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Resolution adopted.
Member Turner moved -First Reading and adoption of.Ordinance No. 1120 -A4 as
follows, with waiver of Second Reading:
ORDINANCE NO. 1120 -A4
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING'ORDINANCE NO. 1120
TO CHANGE THE NAME OF GRANTEE
THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. That Article I, Section 2, Paragraph J of said Ordinance be
amended to read as follows:
"J. . "Grantee" is Rogers.Cablesystems.of the Southwest, Inc."
Sec. 2. This.Ordinance'will be effective in accordance with the provisions of
Article %IV of -said Ordinance', including delivery to the City of the acceptance,
opinion of legal counsel, guarantees and other documents as required by said
Article %IV,.and provided further, however, that it shall become effective only if
all of the cities of'Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins,. Minnetonka and Richfield adopt
an ordinance similar to this Ordinance within ninety (90) days after the adoption
of this Ordinance.
Sec. 3. Subject to the provisions of Section 2 hereof; -this Ordinance shall.
be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication.
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
By
Its Mayor
ATTEST: By
Its Manager
City Clerk
A.
First Reading: July 11, 1988
Second Reading: Waived
Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney
Ordinance adopted.
1988 AMENDMENTS TO MINNESOTA TAX INCREMENT FINANCING ACT DISCUSSED. In reference
to a letter dated July 13, 1988 to the Council from Jerry Gilligan regarding the
1988 Amendments to the Minnesota Tax In Financing Act, Member Kelly asked
if Mr. Gilligan would attend a Council Meeting to explain the legislation.
Manager Rosland said he has asked that Mr. Gilligan prepare an executive summary
of the letter and that he could be brought in if the Council still wished further
.explanation. No formal action was taken.
AMM BOARD ACTIONS REPORTED. Member Turner reported on the following actions of
the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM):
1) City of Edina's resolution regarding sound barriers which was forwarded to the
AMM has been referred to the AMM Transportation Committee;
2) AMM voted to join the Municipal Legislative Caucus's lawsuit against the State
of Minnesota concerning property tax legislation;
3) AMM Board adopted a resolution in support of the League of Minnesota-Cities's
developing computer capability to run models of the various legislative proposals
for property tax changes. Member Turner said she voted against the resolution
because she felt the LMC's role should be that of developing policy and that it
should find another organization that could develop the computer capability;
4) AMM Area Breakfast - July 19, 7:30 a.m. - Minnetonka Community Center - for
managers, mayors and council members to discuss issues important to their cities.
PUBLICITY ON INFORMING RESIDENTS REGARDING SEPARATION OF YARD WASTE QUESTIONED.
Member Turner asked how the City is informing the residents regarding the
ordinance amendments recently adopted with regard to separation of yard waste for
pick -up by private haulers and whether it was incumbent on the haulers to so
inform their customers. She said she had not received any notice from her hauler.
Manager Rosland said that the haulers have done that and staff has written the
haulers thanking them for the notification. A discussion was held on ways of
communicating "good neighbor" policies to the residents with no formal action
being taken.
COMPLAINT REGARDING HANDICAPPED PARKING AT JERRY'S COMPLEX NOTED. Member Richards
said he had received a phone call from a resident who did not think the public
parking ramp at Jerry's complex complied with the handicapped parking
requirements. Engineer Hoffman responded that four handicapped parking spaces
were being installed on the lower level and would be the required 12 feet in
width.
LETTERS REGARDING DROUGHT /SPRINKLING BAN NOTED. Mayor Courtney said that the City
has received a number of letters from residents regarding the sprinkling ban and
that some felt they were being discriminated against because they had to stay up
to water between 9 p.m. and 9 a.m. while those with underground sprinklers did
not. He also said staff had received calls from individuals who were rude and
used profanity and that he had told the staff they should hang up on that type of
call. He pointed out that a lot of the staff's time is being given to calls
regarding the watering ban
MEMBERSHIP ON AMM LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEES DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland
directed the Council's attention to a bulletin from the Association of
Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) regarding membership on AMM Legislative Policy
Committees and asked if any of the Council wished to serve on one of the five
committees listed. He advised that Assistant Manager Gordon Hughes will nominated
for the Housing and Economic Development Committee and that Ceil Smith's name will
be submitted for the General Legislation Committee. Member Smith asked that his
name be submitted for the Municipal Revenues Committee.
MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LAWSUIT DISCUSSED. Manager explained that with
regard to the potential Municipal Legislative Caucus (MLC) lawsuit against the
State of Minnesota:all prior indications were that the MLC was not going to sue.
At a recent meeting the MLC decided to sue because they feel strongly that the
Legislature is dealing with the tax laws unfairly as well as using a "garbage
bill" or "closed door" approach. He commented that he had voted no on the
question because he had read that as the Council's position. The AMM is joining
in the suit as well as 66 cities. Member Turner said she had voted for the AMM
supporting the suit because she felt once the MLC had made the decision to sue it
was an opportunity for unity among the cities to go forward on this together. She
said the only city that voted against it on the AMM Board was the City of St.
Paul. Member Richards asked who would be representing the entity, how much will
it cost, and will the City of Edina have a chance to give its viewpoint on whether
it will support an expenditure of City funds for this purpose.. Manager Rosland
explained that at the present time the recommendation to support the lawsuit comes
from within the MLC funds. The MLC funds for next year are recommended'to go from
a $10,000 cap to a $12,000 cap; those funds would support the lawsuit and the
various MLC activities. Richard Gaalswyck, a specialist in real estate tax law,
of the firm of Maun- Green, would represent the MLC and the cities. The suit would
first go to the tax court. Also within that budget is the retaining.of a public
relations firm to.correlate the cause of why the lawsuit, etc. The total budget
is estimated at approximately $75,000. Member Turner commented that the AMM voted
to contribute $5,000 and also approved their budget for 1989 with a 4% dues
increase. She added that on tough issues like this, when sitting on the AMM Board
and trying to represent the City Council it would have been helpful if the
Council had.taken the time to more fully discuss this issue on the two occasions
when the lawsuit was brought up. A consensus was not developed .nor a -vote taken.
She urged that when critical issues come up that the Council take the time to talk
them through. Member Rosland said a letter will be written to all the 66 cities
on behalf of the LMC asking them to participate financially in the suit. The suit
will attempt to focus the legislature on the fact that a lot of people are upset
about the current tax laws. No formal action was taken.
CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly to
approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 7/11/88: General
Fund $369,487.97, Art Center $8,227.26, Capital Fund $2,859.27, Swimming Pool Fund
$5,309.99, Golf Course Fund $45,178.12, Recreation Center Fund $2,973.94, Gun
Range Fund $998.72, Edinborough Park $14,398.93, Utility Fund $230,864.44, Liquor
Dispensary Fund $22,706.79, Construction Fund.$5,425.00, Total $708,430.43.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Courtney declared.the
meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m.
City Clerk
r e '
O
e. �r
Cn
,� �O
N�
• RPOM��v�
lees
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
III. A
From:
Francis Hoffman�,d
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date:
14 July, 1988
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
BA -282
❑
To Council
100% Petition
Indian Hills West Addition
Action
❑
Motion
Permanent
Street Surfacing
and Concrete Curb and Gutter
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve Project BA -282 for 100% assessment against Indian Hills West Addition.
Info /Background:
Project was petitioned by Mike Halley, the developer. The project is to place
permanent street surfacing on concrete curb and gutter in the subdivision.
The project would be started in 1988 and completed in 1989. The estimated
cost is $36,655.53. The project would be assessed over a ten year period.
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -282
LOCATION: Apache Road and Indian Way West in Indian Hills West Addition
HEARING DATE: 18 July, 1987
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 36.665.53
(Includes Engineering,.Clerical & Interest)
NO. OF ASSESSABLE LOTS 11
ESTIMATED COST PER LOT: $3.333.23
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:
LOT BLOCK ADDITION
1
1
Indian
Hills
West
2
1
Indian
Hills
West
3
1
Indian
Hills
West
4
1
Indian
Hills
West
5
1
Indian
Hills
West
6
1
Indian
Hills
West
7
1'
Indian
Hills
West
8
1
Indian
Hills
West
9
1
Indian
Hills
West
10
1
Indian
Hills
West
11
1
Indian
Hills
West
Subtotal: $28,747.00
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
75
CY
Excavation for Soft Spots
$ 10.00
$ 750.00
150
TONS
Cl. 2 Gravel
12.00
1,800.00
219
TONS
2" Thick Compacted Mn /DOT 2331 Base 32.00
7,008.00
164
TONS
1 1/2" Thick Compacted Mn /DOT
2341 Wear
36.50
5,986.00
264
LF
B6 -18 Concrete Curb and Gutter
6.50
1,716.00
1,176
LF
Edina Drive over Curb and Gutter
5.75
6,762.00
30
TONS
FA3 Trap Rock Seal Coat (Includes
Oil) 80.00
2,400.00
100
GAL
Oil for Tack Coat
3.00
300.00
8
EACH
Adjust Manholes
125.00
19000.00
4
EACH
Adjust Gate Valves
100.00
400.00
5
EACH
Adjust Catch Basins
125.00
625.00
Subtotal: $28,747.00
v
Estimate of Cost
Improvement No. P -BA -282
Apache Road and Indian Way West
in Indian Hills West Addition
Page Two
Prepared By
Checked By
Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: $ 3.449.64
$32,196.64
Add 13.88% Capitalized Interest: $ 4.468.89
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $36,665.53
Francis J. Hoff an,
Director of Pu lic Works
and City Engineer
PETITION
TO THE HONORr*,,BLE COUNICIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA:
GENTLEMEN':
The undersigned are the owners of all the property �
mzd-
and herebv petition the
Council to
%ice°,? �vlIj
construct a �/'h1M�,��,� �:c -PPr in
-�/� •�i!
/Y.
i
to service their properties and to assess 100% of
the cost
thereof against
their
properties.
Dated
SIGNATUREQF OWN1 4RS ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION OF
PROPERTY
o e
•'��bRPop"N't •
leas
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: 14 July, 1988
Subject: BA -284
Minnesota Drive
from France Avenue to
Edinborough Way
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III. B
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
To Council
Action
0
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Approve preliminary plans for Minnesota Drive from France Avenue to Edinborough
Way. Additionally, authorize a NO PARKING resolution on both sides on street
subject to state aid standards.
Info /Background:
This road project is to construct a four lane roadway with appropriate left
turn lanes. The'project would be the new roadway link from France Avenue to
Edinborough Way.
The project would be a state aid project for the surfacing and curb and gutter.
It is proposed to start the project in late 1988 and complete the project in
1989. The roadway would be used to connect Edinborough more directly to the
France /I -494 interchange and as a detour during construction of the Hedberg
project. This project is subject to granting of roadway easements by existing
property owners. The estimated cost is $251,248.89.
ESTIMATE OF COST
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH
CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -284
LOCATION: Minnesota Drive from France Ave to
HEARING DATE: 18 July, 1988
ESTIMATED COST OF CONSTRUCTION: $ 251.248.89
(Includes Engineering, Clerical & Interest)
STATE AID PROJECT NO. 120- 171 -05
Edinborough Way
UNIT
QUANTITY
UNIT
DESCRIPTION
PRICE
TOTAL
1
Mobilization
9,200.00
9,200.00
550
LF
Remove Curb (Concrete)
2.00
1,100.00
200
LF
Remove Curb (Bituminous)
1.00
200.00
18
SY
Remove Bituminous Island
3.00
54.00
2,695
SY
Remove Bituminous Pavement
1.50
4,042.50
62
SY
Remove Concrete Apron
8.00
496.00
200
SF
Remove Concrete Sidewalk
.50
100.00
200
LF.
Saw�Cut Bituminous
2.00
400.00
350
CY
Subgrade Exc'..L.V.
7.00
2,450.00
12.7
RD. STA. Subgrade Prep.
300.00
3,810.00
2,850
TONS
6" Class 2
7.60
21,660.00
119
TONS
AC for 2331
180.00
21,420.00
1,165
TONS
2" 2331 Base 5.1%
18.00
20,970.00
1,165
TONS
2" 2331 Binder
18.00
20,970.00
56
TONS
AC for 2341
180.00
10,080.00
980
TONS
2" 2341 Wear 5.7%
18.00
17,640.00
900
GAL
Tack
2.00
1,800.00
133
TONS
FA3 Trap Rock
50.00
6,650.00
2,650
GAL
Oil for Seal Coat
1.50
3,975.00
4,140
LF
B618 Curb
5.50
22,770.00
330
SY
8" Driveway Apron
30.00
9,900.00
20
SY
6" Driveway
27.00
540.00
60
SY
8" Valley Gutter
30.00
1,800.00
.10
EA
Adj. CB
50.00
500.00
4
EA
Adj. MH
200:00
800.00
4
EA
Adj. G.V.
100.00
400.00
370
CY
4" Compacted Topsoil Borrow
L.V. 10.00
3,700.00
2,200
SY
Sod
2.30
5,060:00
450
LF.
4" PVC F &I
10.00
4.500.00
Subtotal: $
t
196,987.50
Estimate of Cost
Improvement No. P -BA -284
Minnesota Drive from France Avenue
to Edinborough Way
S.A.P. No. 120 - 171 -05
Page Two
Prepared By
Checked By
Add 10% Engineering, 2% Clerical: $ 23.638.50
$ 220,626.00
Add 13.88% Capitalized Interest: $ 30.622.89
Estimated Total Cost of Construction: $ 251,248.89
Fran J. Hoffman, E.
Director of Public orks
and City Engineer
RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON
S.A.P. 102 - 171 -05 FROM FRANCE AVENUE TO EDINBOROUGH WAY
IN THE CITY OF EDINA. MINNESOTA
THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 18th day of July, 1988, by the City of Edina in
Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called
the "City ".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 171 (Minnesota Drive) from
France Avenue (CSAH 17) to Edinborough Way;
WHEREAS, the City will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the improvement
of this Street, and '
WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both
sides of the street approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid
Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions,
and
WHEREAS, the extent of these restrictions that would be a necessary prerequisite
to the approval of this construction as a Municipal State Aid project in the City
has been determined;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: That the City shall ban the parking of
motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 171 (Minnesota Drive) at all times.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing resolution is.a true and
correct copy of the resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its
Regular Meeting of July 18, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular
Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of September, 1988.
City Clerk
o e
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: July 18, 1988
Recommendation:
No action required.
Info /Background:
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # 1V. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Center Companies, representing the Equitable Life Assurance Society of
the United States, has requested an opportunity to informally present
their plans to expand and renovate Southdale. The plans include the
construction of a new Dayton's store, and the conversion of the present
Dayton's store to mall space.
Final Development Plan review of the expansion is scheduled for the
July 27, 1988, Planning Commission meeting. The proposal should be
before the Council for action on August 15, 1988.
tea. tir
tz L\
o e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: JULY 15, 1988
Subject: DRAFT ORDINANCE NO.406 -A5
REQUIRING EXTERIOR
COMPLETION OF ONE & TWO
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
WITHIN 12 MONTHS OF
ISSUANCE OF PERMIT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # y.A.1
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
Ordinance
Adoption of Ordinance No. 406 -A5 Establishing a Deadline for Completing
Construction of the Exterior of All Single and Two Family Residential
Structures and Imposing a. Penalty.
Info /Background:
At the Council Meeting of July 11, 1988 the Council was advised that both
the Building Construction Appeals Board and the Community Development and
Planning Commission had recommended adoption of the above referenced ordinance.
Attorney Tom Erickson has prepared a draft ordinance for the Council's review
and consideration, copy of which is attached. This has been placed on the
Council Agenda -for July 18, 1988.
ORDINANCE NO. 406 -A
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 406
BY ESTABLISHING A DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING
CONSTRUCTION OF THE EXTERIOR OF ALL SINGLE AND TWO FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND IMPOSING A PENALTY
The City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota ordains:
Section .1. Ordinance: No. 406 is hereby amended by adding as
Section 3 thereof, the following:.
"Section 3 Completion of Exterior. The roof and building
exterior of all single and two family structures, including
garages and accessory buildings, shall be completed in compliance
with all applicable building codes and ordinances, within
12 months after the date.of issuance of a building permit-for the
new construction, alteration or relocation of such structures, or
within 12 months of the effective date of this section; whichever
is later."
Section 2. Ordinance No. 406 is hereby further amended by adding
as Section 4 thereof, the following:
"Section 4 Penalty. Any person who violates or fails to comply
with any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor and. subject to the penalties set forth in Ordinance
No. 175 and other penalties and remedies available under the
Minnesota State Building Code."
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
immediately upon its passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published in the on
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
o� e
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Ken Rosland
From: Craig Swanson
Date: July 15, 1988
Subject: Ordinance No. 1011 -A1-,
An Ordinance Regulating the
Possession, Purchase or Delivery
of Controlled Substances, and
Providing a Penalty
Recommendation:
Recommend adoption.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # v -A.2
Consent F ]
Information Only ❑
Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
�.. Ordinance
Adoption of the ordinance is necessary due to small quantities of drugs
which are excluded under certain statute:. And, the County Attorney, as a
practical matter, does not prosecute cases 'involving relatively small
amounts of drugs even if such amounts are within the scope of the State
statute. This ordinance provides a misdemeanor penalty for those
exceptions as well as those cases returned to the City by the County
Attorney. The proposed ordinance was developed by the Edina prosecuting
attorney and coordinated through the City Attorney and the Police
Department.
ORDINANCE NO. 1011 -A1.
An Ordinance Regulating the Possession, Purchase
or Delivery of Controlled Substances, and. Providing a Penalty
The City Council for the.City of Edina, Minnesota, ordains:
SEC. 1. DEFINITIONS.
State Statute Incorporated. The definitions listed in Minn. Stat. 5152.01
are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Ordinance as completely
as if set out herein in full. Specifically, the following words and terms,
when used in this Ordinance, shall have the following meanings, unless the
context clearly indicates otherwise:
1. Drug. The term "drug" includes all medicines and preparations recognized
in the United States pharmacopoeia or national formulary and any substance
or mixture of substances intended to be used for the cure, mitigation, or
prevention of disease of either humans or animals.
2. Administer. "Administer" means to deliver by, or pursuant to the
lawful order of a licensed medical doctor a single dose of a controlled substance
to a patient or research subject by injection, inhalation, ingestion, or
by any other immediate means.
3. Controlled substance. "Controlled substance" means a drug, substance,
or immediate. precursor in Schedules I through V of Minn. Stat. 3152.02
The term shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating
liquors, or tobacco.
4. Pharmacist intern. The term "pharmacist intern" means a natural -
person, a graduate of the college of pharmacy, University of Minnesota, or
other pharmacy college, approved by�the board, or a person satisfactorily
progressing toward the degree in pharmacy required for licensure, registered
by the state board of pharmacy, for the purpose of obtaining practical experience
as a requirement for licensure as a pharmacist or a qualified applicant,
awaiting licensure.
5. Manufacturing. "Manufacturing ", in places other than a pharmacy,
_means and_i_ncludes_ the production, - qual -ity- control, and standardization-by-
mechanical, physical, chemical, or pharmaceutical means, packing, repacking,
tableting, encapsulating, labeling, relabeling, filling, or by the other
process, of drugs.
6. Dispense. "Dispense" means to deliver one or more doses of a controlled
substance in a suitable container, properly labeled, for subsequent administration
to, or use by a patient or research subject.
-1-
7. Marijuana. "Marijuana" means all parts of the plant of any species
of the genus Cannabis, including all agronomical varieties, whether growing
or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant;
and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation
-of such plant, its seeds or resin, but shall not include the mature stalks
of such plant, fiber from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of
such plants, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture,
or preparation of such mature stalks,'except the resin extracted therefrom,
fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable
of germination.
8. Narcotic drug. "Narcotic drug" means any of the.following, whether
produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable
origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination
of extraction and chemical synthesis:
(1) Opium, coca leaves, and opiates;
(2) A compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or preparation of opium,
coca leaves, or opiates;
(3) A substance, and any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or
preparation thereof, which is chemically identical with any of the substances
referred to in clauses (1) and (2), except that the words "narcot.ic drug"
as used in this .chapter shall not include decocainized coca leaves or extracts
of coca leaves, which extracts do not contain cocaine or ecgonine..
9. Opiate. "Opiate" means any dangerous substance having an addiction
forming or addiction sustaining liability similar to morphine or being capable
of conversion into a drug having such addiction forming or addiction sustaining
liabiity. '
10. Opium poppy. "Opium poppy" means the plant of the species Papaver
somniferum L., except the seeds thereof.
11. Person. "Person" includes every individual, copartnership, corpo-
ration or association of one or more individuals.
12. Poppy straw. "Poppy straw" means all parts, except the seeds, of
the opium poppy after mowing.
13. Immediate precursor. "Immediate precursor" means a substance which
the state board of pharmacy has found to be and by rule designates as being
the principal compound commonly used or produced for use, and which is an
immediate chemical intermediary used or likely to be used in the manufacture
of a controlled substance, -the control of which is necessary to prevent,
curtail, or limit such manufacture.
14. Small amount. "Small amount" as applied to marijuana means 42.5
grams or less. This provision shall not apply to the resinous form of marijuana.
-2-
15. Appropriate agency. "Appropriate agency" means either the bureau
of criminal apprehension, the state board of pharmacy, state patrol, county
sheriffs and their deputies, or city policy departments in municipalities
containing 2,500 or more inhabitants.
16. Drug paraphernalia. "Drug paraphernalia" means all equipment, pro-
ducts, and materials of any kind, except those items used in conjunction
with permitted uses of controlled substances under this chapter or the Uniform
Controlled Substances Act, which are knowingly or intentionally used primarily
in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance, (2) injecting, ingesting, inhaling,
or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance, (3)
testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of a controlled substance,
or (4) enhancing the effect of a controlled substance.
SEC. 2. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.
State Statute Incorporated. The five schedules of controlled substances
listed in Minn. Stat. 5152.02 are hereby incorporated in and made a part
of this Ordinance as completely as, if set out herein in full.
SEC. 3. PROHIBITED ACTS.
(a) It shall be unlawful for 'any person., firm or corporation to manu-
facture, possess, sell, give away, barter, exchange, distribute, or otherwise
transfer any controlled substance.
(b) The provisions of Subsection (a) do not apply:
(1) To possession by a person for his own use and when possession
is authorized by law;
(2) to the prescribing, administering, or dispensing of a controlled
substance by a pharmacist, physician, doctor of osteopathy licensed to practice
medicine, dentist, podiatrist, veterin-arian,.or other authorized person in
the course of his professional practice;
(3) to the sale of a controlled substance in the regular course
of business to registered wholesalers and manufacturers of controlled substances,
registered pharmacies, licensed hospitals or institutions wherein sick and
injured persons are cared for or treated, bona fide animal hospitals, or
licensed medical doctors;
(4) to the possession of a controlled substance in the regular
course of business by registered wholesalers and manufacturers o.f controlled
substances, registered pharmacies, licensed hospitals wherein sick and injured
persons are cared for or treated, bona fide animal hospitals, or licensed
medical doctors;
-3-
(5) ^to possession of a controlled substance by a person in accor-
dance with the terms of a prescription and prescribed treatment of a licensed
medical doctor;.
(6) to possession of a controlled substance by-common carriers
or warehousemen lawfully engaged in transporting or storing such substances
in the regular course of business;
(7) to the possession of a controlled substance by public officers
or employees while in the performance of official duties requiring such poss.es-
sion or control.
SEC. 4. FRAUD.
It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or procure, attempt to sell
or procure, or possess or have in his control a controlled substance by:
(1) Fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or
(2) the use of a false name or address; or
(3) forgery or alteration of a prescription; or
(4) giving false credit; or
(5) making, issuing, or uttering any false or forged prescription;
or
(6) falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing any
person to be, a manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacist, physician, doctor of
osteopathy licensed to practice medicine, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian,
or other authorized person for the purpose of obtaining a controlled substance.
SEC. 5. PENALTY.
Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor except as provided in Minn. Stat. 5152.15 Subd. 2(5),
.(6), and (7), and subject to the penalties set forth in Edina City Ordinance
No. 175, the provisions of which are hereby incorporated in and made a part
of this Ordinance as completely as if set out herein in full.
SEC. 6. CONFISCATION AND DISPOSITION OF PROHIBITED DRUGS.
Any controlled substance found in the possession of any person convicted
of a violation of this Ordinance shall be confiscated and shall be forfeited
to the Chief of Police, who shall make proper and timely disposition thereof
by destroying them.
-4-
SEC. 7. USE OF ORIGINAL CONTAINERS AND LABELS REQUIRED.
All patients having possession.of any controlled substance, by lawful
prescription of a licensed medical doctor while such controlled substances .
are lawfully in such person's possession, shall keep such controlled substances
in the original container in which they were delivered until used in accordance
with such prescription, and shall not remove the pharmacist's original label
identifying the prescription from such original container.
SEC. 8. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its
passage and publication.
-5-
MINUTES
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
JULY 127 1988
9:00 A.M.
Agenda Item VII.A
MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman
Lois Coon
Craig Swanson
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gordon Hughes.
Alison Fuhr.
OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Norma Hallonquist, 5320 Halifax Avenue
Mr. Randolph Hosler, 5133 Halifax Avenue
Ms. Eleanore Hammond, 5305 Halifax Avenue
Ms. Teresa Forliti, 5336 Halifax Avenue
Mr. John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue .
Mr. Janet Anderson, 4001 Natchez Avenue
Mr. Ron.Ahola, 4003 Monterey Avenue
Mr. Roy Lewis, 4000 Monterey Avenue,
Mr. Seth Witts, 5113 Indianola Avenue.
Mr. Tom Legeros, 5128 Indianola Avenue
Ms. Barb Olson, 5124 Indianola Avenue
Ms. Sherry Bergdorf, 5105 Indianola Avenue
Ms. Linda Kester, 4015 West 54th Street
Ms. Pam Aagaard, 5313 Halifax Avenue
Ms. Smiley, 5308 Halifax Avenue
Ms. Donna Bohn, 5241 Halifax Avenue
Ms. Mary Hosler,, 5133 Halifax Avenue
Mr. Howard Merriman, 4075 West 51st Street
Ms. Ruth Newcombe, 4075.West 51st Street -
Ms. Alice Larsen, 5037 In Avenue
Ms. Nancy Anderson, 6404 Parkwood Road
Ms. Cynthia Erickson, 5409 Londonderry Road
Ms. Ellen Anderson, 6404.Parkwood Road
Ms. Jean.Mooty, 5320 Kelsey Terrace
Mr. Paul Cramer, 6512 Parkwood Road
Ms. Evie Gerdorf, 5210 Green Farms Road
Officer Brandon Deshler, Edina Police Department
Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department
SECTION A
Requests .on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified,
and the Council's authorization of recommended action.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
July 12, 1988
Page 2
(Continued)
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns in the Parkwood Road/Larada Lane area.
Continued from February, 1988 meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman opened by reviewing the past history regarding to this item
as discussed at earlier Traffic Safety Committee Meetings. The final .
outcome, to date, from those discussions was the placement of a "STOP"
sign on Larada Lane at Parkwood Road, with a continuance of discussion
on this area pending traffic studies which were to be completed in the
spring or summer of 1988. The traffic counts have now been taken and,
while the majority of this area does not substantially differ from like
areas of Edina, there was a large volume of vehicles noted in the imme-
diate area of Parkwood Road and Larada Lane. This count was 1,173
vehicles daily on Parkwood Road just east of the Larada intersection,
and 1,208 vehicles daily on Parkwood just west of the intersection.
Mr. Swanson further stated that data had been gathered by the Police
Department which would indicate that there were actually three areas
of heavy activity; Larada Lane just north of Parkwood Road, the inter-
section of Parkwood Road and Larada Lane, and the 6600 block area of
Parkwood Road. The speed enforcement data proved that there was high
compliance to the posted limits with 94% of the 365 vehicles surveyed
travelling below 35 mph. There were seven (7) of these 365 vehicles
which were not travelling within acceptable limits. The accident history
of the area revealed that there had been seven (7) accidents.in the area
from 1983 to the present, with the majority of these being in the 6600
block area of Parkwood Road.
Mr. Swanson also felt that because of the curving nature of the roadways
accompanied with heavy foliage, there might be a perception that the
road was narrower and the traffic faster than was actually the case.
He also stated that 1988 might be a good time, given development to the
north of Parkwood, to define and establish right -of -ways in the area.
The question of whether Parkwood Road might develop into a collector
• or semi- collector street was also posed by Mr. Swanson.
Mr. Hoffman stated that he did not anticipate any large increases in
traffic patterns in the years to come, therefore Parkwood Road would
not be classified as a collector street. He also stated that at some
point in the scenario we should be defining right -of -way in the area.
Mr. Hoffman further stated that, based on the unusually high traffic
counts in the Parkwood Road/Larada Lane area, he could now recommend
a 3 -way "STOP" sign based on the volumes.
Mr. Swanson added that the intersection should also be more physically
defined. It was also agreed to by the Committee that the area as a
whole, to include Willow Wood and Green Farms Road, should be assessed.
I , i 1-
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
July 12, 1988
Page 3
(Continued)
Mr. Swanson moved that (1) "STOP" signs be installed for both directions
of Parkwood Road at Larada Lane, (2 the intersection of Parkwood Road
and Larada Lane be physically redefined, 3 "STOP" signs be installed
for both directions of Willow Wood Road at Larada Lane, 47a "STOP" sign
be installed on Kelsey Terrace at Londonderry Road, and 77 the foliage
around existing traffic control devices be trimmed. Mr. Hoffman seconded
the motion. Motion carried 3 -0. NOTE: See attached traffic map.
SECTION B
Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
(1) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Halifax.Avenue, West 51st through
West 54th Streets.
Continued from June, 1988'meeting.
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman again opened the discussion be reviewing the traffic counts
that had been done in the area since the installation of the partial
barricade at West 51st Street and Halifax Avenue. The greatest increase
was on Indianola Avenue, with a substantial decrease in the volume on
Halifax Avenue from West 51st through West 54th Street. There had also
been some surveying of The Lanterns parking lot and there were, in fact,
vehicles that occasionally passed through this area as a "short- cut ".
Mr. Tom Legeros commented that.he had noticed an increased use of the
one -lane alley behind the Peoples Plus station on the corner of
West 50th Street and Halifax Avenue. This was viewed as a safety hazard
due to pedestrians and children who frequently use the alley to get to
the West 50th Street business district. Ms. Sherry Bergdorf also asked
about possible removal of the barricade and use of speed bumps on Halifax
but was told by Mr. Hoffman that the City does not support the use of
speed bumps due to liability issues. Ms. Alice Larson suggested that
the dangers of Halifax Avenue might be eliminated by installation of
sidewalks in the area and was advised by Mr. John Crist that sidewalks
had originally been an option but the majority of Halifax residents had
not thought this a feasible solution. Mr. Hoffman added that to install
sidewalks there would have to be a petition and a public hearing and all
residents would be notified, as was the general_practice.
I - I i
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
July 12, 1988
Page 4
(Continued)
Mr. Seth Witts of 5113 Indianola Avenue stated that years ago when they
initially moved-to the area he felt sidewalks were intentionally omitted
due to upkeep and no inherent need for them. Ms. Barbara Olson, also of
Indianola Avenue, felt that Indianola does not have the need for sidewalks.
However, if safety of the elderly and children was a major issue, the
Halifax Avenue residents may want to reconsider their original position.
She felt that the present barrier is a traffic hazard in itself and Mr.
Witts also stated that the barrier is very hard to see around as its
placement is right at eye -level to the driver. An area resident also
mentioned that the "DO NOT ENTER" signs should be lowered to catch the
driver's attention and was advised by Mr. Hoffman that. when the signs
were installed, they were most probably,installed at a standard height.
Mr. Legeros also asked about the possibility of a "STOP" sign. He was
advised by Mr. Hoffman that initially the complaints had been both speed
and heavy traffic flow in the area. After careful surveying and study,
it was shown that the problem was not so much speed as it was increased
traffic from outside areas using the West 50th Street business district.
The installation of a "STOP" sign would not address the traffic flow
problems which have occurred. -
Ms. Alice Larsen referred to the present study being conducted by St.
Louis Park regarding use of traffic diverters and asked if this was being
done on a temporary or permanent basis and could Edina also follow suit.
Mr. Hoffman stated that at present no one knew what the outcome would be
pending final results from the St. Louis Park study.
Mr. Tom Legeros, Mr. Witts and other residents of the Indianola area also
stated that to make a left -turn onto Indianola from westbound West 50th
Street, especially at peak rush hour times, was extremely dangerous and
accidents had occurred. The concern is that after waiting for very often
extended periods of time to make a left turn and always worrying about
the possibility of being hit from behind, if a courteous driver does not
block the intersection and allows the left turn in front of his vehicle,
there is always the danger of being hit from someone coming_up on that
vehicle's right, which the turning driver cannot see.
Mr. John Crist, spokesperson for the Halifax area residents, stated that
he felt the current barricade should be supported because it has cut the
traffic volume in half, the remaining traffic was driving more courteously,
everyone in the neighborhood still had some sort of access to their homes,
emergency vehicles were not hindered, and walking and driving Halifax was
now less hazardous. Ms. Mimi Hosler also stated that with the expansion
of the West 50th Street business district to include ramps, theatres, etc.,
there was anticipated an even greater increase in volume to this area.
Mr. Swanson asked if volume figures were available from five to seven
years past for comparison purposes and was told by Mr. Hoffman that there
?
TRAFFIC SAFETY
July 12, 1988
Page 5
(Continued)
COMMITTEE MEETING
were no figures
letters that th e
of the West 54th
of its original
too much traffic
per day for this
warrant looking
available. Mr. Hoffman also noted that he has received
barricade has, in fact, impacted neighborhoods south
Street area and changed driving patterns, which was part
intent. Mr. Witt asked how much traffic would be considered
and Mr. Hoffman advised that arbitrarily 1,000 vehicles
type of street was considered on the high end and would
at the area.
Mrs. Coon inquired as to why the idea of a diverter at Halifax and West
52nd Street had been defeated. Mr. Hoffman stated that, at the time,
there were multiple options and the temporary barrier was chosen then
as the best of scenarios. However he felt that diverters could still be
tried. Mrs. Coon had several reservations regarding the present system
stating that the left turn from West 50th Street safety issue was indeed
a problem and that somehow all neighborhood residents should be allowed
the use of their own streets without necessarily opening those streets
to large volumes of outside traffic.
Mr. Swanson's opinion was that placement of the barricade and /or any
altering of traffic patterns would require a time period to change learned
behavior. The intent was for the large volumes of traffic to use the
collector streets as intended and that, if the barricade were removed,
these individuals might now have changed their traffic patterns. He
stated that the St. Louis Park study was.intended to "gauge people's
reactions" and that, in the same light, an afterstudy of the change on
Halifax might also be in order to include license plate study, traffic
counts, etc.
Mr. Hoffman had mixed emotions on the issue and partially felt that an
after -study was also in order.
Mr. Swanson suggested that with the voting representation on the Committee
being down by 40% at this particular meeting, he felt the best recourse
would be to gather more information until the Committee was at full strength.
Mr. Hoffman also recommended continued discussions within the neighborhoods
affected to try to define the best possible solution to this total issue..
Mr. Swanson moved to continue with the traffic diverter as is until further
discussion at the.August Traffic Safety Committee Meeting and pending
after -study of the issue. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried
3 -0.
NOTE: See attached letters to City Council from area residents regarding
barricade issue.
(2) Discuss traffic safety concerns on West 40th Street at Natchez Avenue.
Request received from Janet Anderson, 4001 Natchez Avenue.
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MEETING
July 12, 1988
Page 6
(Continued)
ACTION TAKEN:
Mr. Hoffman opened the discussion by presenting the traffic counts on
West 40th Street between Natchez Avenue and Grimes Avenue. There are,
on an average, 795 vehicles per day.on the west segment of this roadway
and 352 vehicles per day on the east segment of West 40th Street between
these two avenues. This, in Mr. Hoffman's opinion, is not an excessively
large volume for this-type of street and is comparible to other streets
in Edina.
Ms. Janet Anderson, who resides at the corner of West 40th Street and
Natchez Avenue, had a two -fold concern. She was upset by the fact that
enforcement personnel were not writing citations to drivers who were going
even a mile or two over the speed limit, and she was also concerned that
St. Louis Park's traffic diversion study on West 38th and West 39th Streets
would increase the volumes on West 40th Street by a large percentage. She
felt that the Excelsior Boulevard flow does greatly affect what happens
on West 40th Street. Her recommendations were that we change the speed
limit on West 40th Street to 20 mph, that by use of barriers or other
methods the City break traffic flow on West 40th Street between Natchez
and Grimes Avenues, and that the City of Edina needed an organized plan
pertaining to how the St. Louis Park study would impact their area.
Mr. Hoffman explained to Ms. Anderson and the other two residents of the
area that were present that St. Louis Park had initially not communicated
well with the City of Edina on their diverter plans. However, they had
sent a City representative to our June Traffic Safety Committee Meeting
in good faith and we had at that time given them a strong message that
we would, in fact, be scrutinizing and studying the impact that their
efforts might have on the Edina residents who live on the north side.
At present, their study is not complete. They will be looking further
at such places as Wooddale and Quentin Avenues, and the City of Edina
will continue to closely monitor their efforts and how it impacts our
citizens. The facts, at present, were that it could not be proven that
there was an impact on Edina as yet, and when and if that were to occur,
St. Louis Park would most certainly be notified.
Mr. Roy Lewis.was vehemently opposed to this line of thinking. He viewed
St. Louis Park as not acting in good faith and felt that we should not
trust their figures or studies. His opinion was that Edina "reacts "'
and does not "pro -act" in these situations and went on to repeat this
several times throughout the discussion. Mr. Hoffman repeatedly tried
to convince Mr. Lewis that we cannot tell St. Louis Park that they are
impacting us, when in fact that is not the case at present. However,
this response just further agitated Mr. Lewis who then went on to criticize
other aspects of City Government to include a lack of concern or even an
awareness by Council personnel to the problems of the north side area,
the methods used for enforcement activity, Police personnel in general
with derrogatory comments directed at various uniformed officers and
T 'i
r:
TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES
July 12, 1988
Page 7
(Continued)
supervisors in particular, and demands for formalized meetings to include
City Council representation, Police and Engineering Department representa-
tion and representation by the West 40th Street residents so that we might
better understand the citizens concerns and therefore how to more efficiently
conduct our affairs in their best interests. Mr. Lewis also distributed
a copy of a memorandum which he demanded be forwarded to the City Council
that further outlined his proposal.
Mr. Ron Ahola, of Monterey Avenue, stated that he felt the problems of
occasional speeders, drunk drivers on Friday and Saturday nights, and
safety of children and residents in general needed to be acted -on and
it should be done so immediately as it had been going on for years.
Ms. Anderson also stated that she was greatly concerned for the safety
of the children who are picked up at her corner by the school bus, and
also for the elderly pedestrians in area. She felt that a "STOP" sign
may deter speeders but also stated that an area resident.has extreme
allergies to vehicle exhaust and stopping and starting large volumes of
traffic at this intersection might further, aggravate her condition.
Mr. Hoffman, after hearing the viewpoints by the residents, explained
that a 30 mph speed limit in a residential area was mandated by the State
and we would not be allowed to lower that limit. He also said that the
Cities of St. Louis Park and Edina must communicate and work together
to find workable solutions to volume and speed problems, while at the
same time showing awareness for the citizens that any such changes might
impact. He reiterated the steps that will be taken to closely monitor
this on -going situation and the City's commitment to serve its citizens
best interests.
Mr. Swanson moved to continue the matter until further information is
received from the St. Louis Park diversion studies, to conduct further
independent traffic counts in the Morningside area, and to forward the
memorandum from Mr. Roy Lewis to the City Council for their consideration.
Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -0.
NOTE: See attached memorandum from Mr. Roy Lewis referencing West 40th
Street traffic.
Respectfully submitted,
EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
r i ' ;
1
6 -88
i
I a a w
La
} V Y O
\ n 6
J R JJJ
w w
Y }
TE.LEMARK TRAIL A0� `� • UD RD.
WILLOW 1 Wu
v
3 0
Y \ J
I � W
a al I
I ` 387 W
Q
I a
354 a - -- - -
767
I 376 ) o
LAJ • 1208 f, 584
N� 1173
Oop C•
INDICATES "STOP" SIGN
INSTALLATIONS , \�
V
95
W 682
Z 551' .
a °
Z ,.
FIELD WAY sT
Off.
'DROLE
I I t
r...
_i
_ � 4
ZL
9": // �� lffvo��
r , ' t
&--Lll I �jl *�--', 1 9 9 9
ro
I I I I
-ric(
C L
'�:.�,J��.CC`L•L� � n:1r � {�•� l_c•Z .L•J L•� "�.�'� `�7 Z �e� �ry {,i .
J-G
7T
clo-n Cum
t r cc-Ic
530 j
c m9f. R ((,Ta)<,
F I . f
DR. CHARLES JOSEPH BALOGH
5204 HAXZFAX &VMNUM SOU=. WINNFULFOZZZ. 3nlqN=0TA6 554216
21
N
e / 4 72 At
5X, Z
Z
err �e-
or
r
I r I r
i
l
_w J
.........
....`. ....ate- .. �....- �..- .�.�.._ ....'.. ._. ...
�..... • .. .. - . —. . -.
_. .... .._ _�_�.__ __....s.. __ —�
I , I I
,:A(ti. cqofztz C=Szzg-lzz
;illV YnIanota c4vdizuz:
allinizsapoti.i, &Kiiznziota 55424
t2
Yle�l
CY
.5117
Jul 109 1988
Dear Council Members,
We live on the 5300 block of Halifax Ave., and signed the
original petition which resulted in the closing of Halifax at
51st for a trial period. We want to thank you for agreeing to
this experiment, and urge you to make this closure permanent.
This has cut down the traffic significantly. Admittedly it
is a bit inconvenient (even for us), but it has stopped Halifax,
being an easy through traffic alternative to France and Wooddale.
We hope that you Will make this temporary closure a
permanent one. Thank you for your attention and concern.
Sincerely,
-
c/
Jack and Chris Meenan
/� /
Mr. and Mrs. David Maetzold
5114 Hal Hax Ave. So.
Edina, MN 55424
Mayor Wayne Courtney
4313 Eton Place
Edina, MN 5544
Dear Mr. Courtney,
We are writing in regards to the traffic restrictor/
barricade on Halifax and 51th Street. We ask: your support
in making the present barricade PERMANENT at the next city
council meeting.
We have lived on Halifax since 1979. The traffic has
steadily increased over the years. During rush hour it is
°special l v heavy sine- people are using Halifax as a short
cut to miss the stool ights on France. I believe the first
traffic counter showed almost 1200 cars per day using
Halifax during the workweek, and 1400 on the weekend's.
It is difficult to walk: on the side of the street
because the cars speed down Halifax. If we happen to be
wearing dark clothes at night we have had to jump up on the
curve to miss being hit.
Sidewalks would not solve the problem of reckless
drivers who all but ignore the stopsign on 52nd and Halifax.
There are many small children who live around here. We need
to have the AMOUNT of traffic reduced PERMANENTLY.
Since the temporary barricade has been installed it is
like we are living in a new neighborhood, not unlike the one
we moved into back in 179.
The slight inconvenience of driving around the block: is
- worth having a street where the traffic has been cut in HALF
by putting !gyp the "No Turn" signs.
We will bent the City Council meeting to show our
support of this issue. We'd appreciate your help making the
"NO TURN" a PERMANENT situation.
Sin;ce;rr y,
01hron and Dave Mae fold
TO ✓�ul�1, S.`.71.1 Z7 ,ron o -
t
u /c -✓► Q S e 0 / .`i o u.s e Ji t�s T
47 r=te << i P T /` .i c .1 e a S �� �/a ��.t < < e c s -f . ` ✓ .-� y
-
/
r. / /`` ^ r` / (.� ' • Q T T G'� t 4! E' v Z /' : �O c.E ✓t G` , 74-11-1
r /�t Lr.i c- ✓a l u s�-1 e cam! �t '�'� ^_ �j rc.c.S / G u iJ �o Z. �a���i Gc t
/ ,(n % _/ /
✓ c,l .� t r G7 u C� /� .> G / E' Q %ri e
-74v �O /Cr rg ;n 4 ✓/� G Q P i,v tr.f / �.r Tit / '
74 Of
Q t� / e f e .-� `// u a/ // d Ct .�/ i /G'Q G/! CC
"o.S e G� �-4. TT �� c- J rl -i e T l_G
!� u e .-, w► u c �►-L o 4 e c 7L,' �Q ..t cc/ 2 er��e
o
eX eG 71e �. D/
o ., .5 71-
-tl-
c -
✓ O /c! 14 T / T / i
a S u � c9 e � `-.� /� n ct 7 e�
Lt h i e J T r: G Te d a c- c. e 1 S
e_ R .
� �i.t�a / e�i e�c Lp7`
Ala J� e Cl �b / �U Q O S O u 7-14,14, u
!*7;.., � e °C
Ole -' r`.,�� / ✓ e-.
744e T -e
Ac- .. ,e..Ql
r- ""f i/ /t/` l 979- L,/o4
�
74 L' f .' .v
/✓
`'1 ]L!n R
Li 0 t C n !.L t/ �
tC
f � K e h
ri �
,� ., � � � � u s
sa e 7�
�
571
TO ✓�ul�1, S.`.71.1 Z7 ,ron o -
t
u /c -✓► Q S e 0 / .`i o u.s e Ji t�s T
47 r=te << i P T /` .i c .1 e a S �� �/a ��.t < < e c s -f . ` ✓ .-� y
-
/
r. / /`` ^ r` / (.� ' • Q T T G'� t 4! E' v Z /' : �O c.E ✓t G` , 74-11-1
r /�t Lr.i c- ✓a l u s�-1 e cam! �t '�'� ^_ �j rc.c.S / G u iJ �o Z. �a���i Gc t
/ ,(n % _/ /
✓ c,l .� t r G7 u C� /� .> G / E' Q %ri e
-74v �O /Cr rg ;n 4 ✓/� G Q P i,v tr.f / �.r Tit / '
74 Of
Q t� / e f e .-� `// u a/ // d Ct .�/ i /G'Q G/! CC
"o.S e G� �-4. TT �� c- J rl -i e T l_G
!� u e .-, w► u c �►-L o 4 e c 7L,' �Q ..t cc/ 2 er��e
o
eX eG 71e �. D/
o ., .5 71-
-tl-
c -
✓ O /c! 14 T / T / i
a S u � c9 e � `-.� /� n ct 7 e�
Lt h i e J T r: G Te d a c- c. e 1 S
e_ R .
� �i.t�a / e�i e�c Lp7`
Ala J� e Cl �b / �U Q O S O u 7-14,14, u
!*7;.., � e °C
Ole -' r`.,�� / ✓ e-.
744e T -e
Ac- .. ,e..Ql
r- ""f i/ /t/` l 979- L,/o4
July 11, 1988
Dear Council & Traffic Safety Committee Members:
In July of 1987 I moved into a house at 5209 Halifax (two blocks south of
Lund' s)' Having two small children ages 5 and 8, it was important to me to
have a neighborhood where my boys could play freely without the constant worry
of their safety. And even though there were no sidewalks for them to use, the
street appeared quiet enough for them to walk or ride their bikes.
However, it wasn't long before I realized that Halifax was a main thoroughfare
for people who wanted to avoid the lights on France Avenue. Each night I would
lie awake hearing the cars coming north on Halifax from 54th Street, acceler-
ating the entire way, then just as they would reach the stop sign at 52nd, you
could hear them briefly slow for the four —way stop and then continue roaring
toward Lund's.
It was then that I began paying more attention to the traffic on Halifax. Not
only was I amazed to discover that yes, people did come very fast up and down
the street, merely slowing for the stop sign, but the number of vehicles was
incredible! I no longer felt I could allow my children to bike or skateboard up
and down the driveway for fear they would not be able to resist the temptation
to continue down onto the street. Because there are no sidewalks, even the
smallest of children must use the street to get from one house to another in
the neighborhood or even to get to Arden. Park.
It is apparent to those of us living on the street that probably 90% of the
traffic on Halifax comes from people wanting to avoid France Avenue. Just the
fact that they are using our street to avoid the lights on France indicates
they are in a hurry. And being in a hurry, they are probably going faster
than they should be, giving little thought to the numbers of children who
might be playing in or near the street.
Initially I thought allowing neither north or southbound traffic at the north
end of Halifax was the only way to alleviate the problem. However, I am very
pleased that prohibiting only the southbound traffic appears to have been a
successful move on the City's part and alleviated the majority of the traffic
problem. I have tried to console the many complaints from my friends in the
Country Club and Woodland Road /Wooddale areas by standing fast to my conviction
that when it comes to the safety of our children, we should be alot less con-
cerned about such a minor inconvenience to our adults. I am hoping you will -
agree that the safety of our children is imperative and that one way to reduce
the odds of one of them being injured or killed is by keeping the blockade at
51st and Halifax.
Thank you,
Pamela Cornell
r�r 10-A CC7�/
T
4,-,R< 71-,1
T 57'
-f-G.e f2esrzccro�
/w 101,4 cle ,
u c e4 it17P
1 llese BF 7i'R-
� Be De�ru
n�u �� r
J 5 )i
Atli; _S
q ,
July 4, 1988
Mr. Fran Hoffman
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Re: Traffic Diversion
at 51st and Halifax
Edina, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
We understand that you are in charge of the Traffic Safety
Committee studying the diversion of southbound traffic at 51st
and Halifax.
We have been residing at 5132 Indianola Avenue for ten years and
have routinely used that intersection returning home from shopping
the 50th and France area.
This "new wrinkle" is a big inconvenience for us. We now have
been using the alley behind the gas /service station to cut through
to Indianola, but it is narrow and has potential for an accident
the more we, and others, use it as a cut - through.
We are against leaving the barricade in place at 51st and Halifax
and also against any other diversion which would increase the
traffic on Indianola Avenue.
Halifax has always been the busier street.
We are in favor of removing the .barricade and allowing the traffic
to flow as it previously has.
Sincerely,
Lawrence and Janet Anderson
5132 Indianola Avenue South
Edina, Minnesota 55424
,j
July 6, 1988
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, Mn. 55424
Dear Council Members:
My name is Teresa Forliti and I have lived at 5336 Halifax Ave. S. for 29
years.
I want to thank you for the reduction in the traffic on Halifax Avenue
because of the partial barrier and "No Entering" signs at 51st Street that
were O X d by the council as a temporary situation.
In the past, the traffic (not to mention the safety factors involved) have
been excessive - especially since the road work done in previous years at
the 50th and France Shopping area and traffic was diverted to Halifax
Avenue.
While there is some inconvenience, (reeducating myself to go down France
to 54th Street' because I have made the wrong turn several times during
this change and the several extra minutes involved to return home), it is
well worth any inconvenience to have this traffic reduction.
I hope that the City Council will consider making this permanent.
Thank you -
Teresa Forliti
5336 Halifax Ave. S.
Edina, Mn. 55424
cc: Mr. Fran Hoffman
Edina City Engineer
- C T� Lo�.�. -, c.� ASS -- Cc�•• -•� �Trc
r
Sao- 265/
Bennett & Mary Porter
5120 Halifax Avenue South
Edina, MN SS424
Edina City Council
'f801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
July 9, 1988
Dear Council:
The traffic barricade at Sist and Halifax has restored our
neighborhood to a quiet community. Gone are the busy streets
filled with cars taking shortcuts to and from downtown Edina. We
would strongly support the City Council's action to make this
barricade permanent.-
Larger parking lots and movie theaters will undoubtedly bring
more cars to downtown and to our neighborhood unless this
barricade is made permanent. Also, more traffic will make this
intersection more dangerous.
Please remember that it was not the Halifax neighborhood's
intent to anger our neighbors on adjacent streets. We have
compromised on our belief that a total traffic barricade is a
better solution. The trial period has allowed everyone,to see
the REAL traffic effect on all the streets. We believe that the
traffic safety reports will show that there has been a giant
traffic reduction on Halifax and little impact on our neighboring
streets.
Mary and I enjoy walking the neighborhood at least twice weekly.
This neighborhood does not stretch just up and down Halifax
Avenue. It stretches from 50th to S4th and from France Avenue to
the west bank of the creek. We feel we are a part of this
community and that this whole neighborhood would benefit by the
permanent reduction of traffic on Halifax Avenue. We know that
the-council also believes in the preserving the residential
neighborhood. Please show your support for the permanent traffic
barricade.
incerely
Bennett Porter III
Mary Jo Porter
it
T0: Edina City Council
Edina Traffic Safety Council
RE: Temporary traffic barricade on 51st and Halifax Ave.
DATE: July 11, 1988
We are very pleased with the results of the traffic barricade on
51st Street and Halifax Avenue. As Edina residents who live on
Halifax Avenue, we feel that the traffic barricade has resulted
in.
- reduced number of cars traveling south on Halifax.
- a safer environment for residents of all ages.
- a restored residential environment.
- improved "quality of life" for the South Harriet Park
neighborhood.
We support a permanent traffic restrictor /barricade to reduce
traffic on Halifax Avenue.
Thank you
of 44"
rsha an d Georg .uchok
5312 Halifax Avenue
927 -9247
7
i ," f ,PLC
CV
7%
iY
7�6
cto L� 7�e
V4
�Le"o
���9Bg3
Gc���,���� � �� Z- ' Ems, �-i- �•c.e.<. �— �,��
�u.
4b,
cc: Traffic Safety Committee
i
Ile
J
� , s
�Cr4, .�-c�.�1
LI
-} ^I �: c �+ Cs1 �1av`. -�iv,[ f ``� t�- c�•� J a-r�f i✓l I L / <'��i�2 i at
����., •�h : ; • 5 �'�•+ yes � .:.� fi h. -; k�
e A ��
Ctii!►� \rri rcC
i�t. I�,r���T��,z,• C.,��,� ( tr�LZ�.
St felt r'
1 l ,
C ! r 1C. c�� , �c.L� Ir..{[La G,0..
C; ✓v�L \1 �Cita,v tlGt Tio�; fr fC':� Srol awl �� rCt,61-1XIr
f If r
1n 0 c�L 11c;v.rv�e L�cfoc. erg s�(�r�, l,�cci<. p, TL.•�, to
C:,ti
'fk r.cZ + "c�TG.• nlr.,c1� b� �'{. ,r1)s�d'LJ•� C- l- �aa•.5e , j
_ N'
JG;bn i C- 115- '61rr`� fi 6
t[ L L ` 1 W J �y( �1�. R'i.0 L� i ' rl, i 1 L
i,)Ghwl 'd •�i�i�¢ 'i�1 �" ��:rti1�� lT .`Jrv1�1(.� 10.0
ec-
a . ta
oil Ora S�Tccf
AJ 4L J7 i� f
on
-flIze, L-arrtffLic-',
�-�� r��i�Gz bc���rcc�� �1CJorifr. cF
�� ��ti�iC c��cc� J �i�'�%�,�. o � c. ce�
,y J P �
N, ot-
Loy-
W�
prnq,�Wle4c�
2441 '
5313 ,Ja.�cCe, .
By: William S. Phillips
The Lanterns
4075 West 51 Street
Edina, MN 55424
STATEMENT TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
Date: June 20, 1988
We at the Lanterns understand and are sympathetic to the residents of Halifax
Avenue South. But we are disappointed with the lack of notice of the test
All of us only learned after the fact. We are surprised that no attempt was
made to understand about access to our garage.
There is a problem for those of us who use the west entrance. When going
east on 51 Street, the turn into our outdoor lot is almost a hairpin right,
which must be.made quickly because of following traffic. This turn is
dangerous and inconvenient, and will become an unexpected surprise to
visitors who are not familiar with the area.
We also expect other motorists to use our parking lot as an illegal turn
into Halifax. We wish that the police could give tickets to persons who do so.
We don't know what the solution to Halifax's traffic problem should be, but
all we ask is that consideration be given to Lanterns residents who desire to
use the west garage entrance, and to visitors for whom the hard, fast right
turn is difficult.
�l - 7i�,}C
. . ' � k n. h`G �4�'.ti, q� �' �, -��, � �. � o� ri�w�o�t•C �vrfti�
42rq
Foie • Aq a,t&( 7o-W,, S. Ila,le
5-�-QYa /i 7Carc Za..` 4--
4f/4 GUj J.L c UO i c Du r �O� C?� ate..v Flo .ri �c
o�
Po(e r Q are c on.!'.'�Prc�,'f e
i'
liYf o r2 CoYt- T6�cJ' i q v� Cl _ Cdr 75r!
CL
c�K,
L
Ct-
t v
T Lt C
C17 L &
7n ci -z-,-� -t-Lo- t,/-,
���� °`�l� i.J
COY
4
It'll
A-L
ItA- e?lpj A-4,tv 14-9
ZL.
C. c,
AL �L- :;;r C 4-1.
July 8, 1988
Mr. Fran Hoffman
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Mn 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
Presentation of a protest to the governing bodies of Edina is
an unusual and not pleasing practice for Mrs. Carlson and myself.
We have lived here for 41 years and this is a great place to live.
We have a condition, however, that we believe justifies such an
action. The condition is the closing of the North to South travel
of Halifax Avenue, a public road, beginning with The Laftterns
to 54th Street.
The request for closure, we understand, is based on the number
of vehicles that use this route. Added to this is a concern for
children living on this stretch of road. Properly, this deserves
a valid consideration. But only in the context of conditions
created for the balance of the community adjacent to Halifax Avenue.
Halifax Avenue, from 51st to 54th Street, is a short distance with
excellent sight lines. Entry to Halifax from the North is sharply
slowed by the present curvature of the road. The intersection at
52nd Street has the protection of East /West stop signs. It is not
an avenue given to excessive speeds or difficult driving.
In the 41 years of our residence, we cannot recall a single tragic
or genuinely serious problem involving an automobile. The traffic
generated by Lunds has been a matter of years and there has been no
sudden increase in such traffic.
The situation of Halifax then must be compared to the adjacent use
of Arden Avenue and Minnehaha Blvd. While we do not consider this
excessive, traffic seems to have increased. It then is essential
you consider relative conditions on this route as compared to
Halifax.
In consideration of children, Halifax has no monopoly on
youngsters. Our observations are there are more children
living on Arden Avenue and Minnehaha Blvd than on Halifax.
Far more important, however, is the playground beginning at
52nd Street and Minnehaha Blvd. Here is a concentration of
children and they are on and off the street. If a concern for
the safety of children is involved, and it should be, the
increased traffic on Arden Avenue and Minnehaha Blvd must be
recognized as a danger.
Sight lines on Minnehaha Blvd are far more difficult than on
Halifax with two sharp curves and a total loss of sight line as
you approach 54th Street. Just as bad, the curvatures of Minnehaha
Blvd seem to serve as a stimuli to some who wheel around the
curves with tires that shriek. Minnehaha Blvd is not well
adapted to traffic.
While the above is important, there is another phase that must be
considered. That which is unfair and irksome is that we who are
residents adjacent to Halifax no longer are permitted to use a
public road that is convenient and logical to use. A preferential
condition has been created that penalizes those of us whose daily
activities are in the community. For example, instead of the
rational route from Lunds to 52nd Street we now are required to
drive through the traffic of 50th Street or France Avenue in a
circuitous route.
Please understand, we do not consider this an impossibility. But it
is an inconvencience not justified by the volume of traffic or any
undue element of danger present on Halifax Avenue.
We are advised some of us living in the community were not advised
of the petition to close Halifax to our use. The matter deserves a
proper opportunity to express ourselves as in this letter and before
the Council if it reaches that level.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this to you and to the
Edina Traffic Safety Committee.
Si y,
re
hes ey C r son
CFC /dh 5225 Minnehaha Blvd
cc - Mr. David Katkov - Mr. Seth Witts
Mrs. Ruth Newcombe - Mayor C. Wayne Courtney
7 -ii- (FS,
.Sa eT y �o.....- .`' e e
�//a n �C O tti ✓ �' . `i 4o r' 7� 4 e 7 �, .vim e T- h
!na ✓z / �a ,`.en ;n vtC' /�' /� /`/ /e "�ez7,L 0 "47oll
C, (: a afc /�,;, S: / 6 e ;`we eK S/ r S y'��r•
uyq O. /i /�(r�,Qi/C SiuuTi p.'t OT Ci�00S /'��/ �U
O u✓ `i v G� s , v� s f /% .� ,' O �� 744 e. Gz u .-e r,T
✓t (�- / e a..S r / ►', -� a t-T G t ✓ e C-
C-; ✓, 'X Co4j yt.. C- [� w a s
✓� t /O a C C G i G T/ o .-7 O ✓t S� t
L,, o i K a 71
p{ ,.c ✓ i � f �-.S h n , u sr J �C� b ° L�GZ i ! � � c �, �u .- ! y r` q � . � 1
JL r /e s✓
G C? G^ CA-, cC .s
e t —fie c r.` v / e 7 a/ / w e e v e s 2�� e c_ 1 P
Q v; ,/� ; i a.f . - e C! .c C .� G/ iLG� e- f is 44/ v J b u T i t T
irM i4PG�! /
ac!or�`c.�� ,eJ� s� /�� .iaf,'e 4,4 Ti.�� 7e /ejs 40
f"G�e ..�� �/ � Fsa •� ce Ste% /��`�q cziec,
u�/e fo c sc "����u�� 0274
;' .►- 4 �� /
-a e n 4 � i � C41 TN-.
d� 4,le
e .... /e a a� / c Sale Ce...� ,`��e P
re. c o . ►� .... ,e .-L of To wt.. 4(" � 7L I< -e-
L11
JCF-z k- AV 9.z? -Yo s'7
7/18/88 To Council
� - all /
47 �,
dL 7'�) ot-A
� J, ��C1bn,•1cy /Yz� p/-�osi�i /lam
Opp0
!fin C /OW
CC) �i�,
tj ucf Ia,178&
To : c t r couflc-, c. AnrO "mdfF1C .SAFE r y coinmi rT6-a
5'23C, l�IRL�FAA A ✓E.So
1 FOOK RETrNT,cy OF 7?lE - regr-FiC Res TRlcroRlAfAT1605
A 7 1%91- ifp)C A ✓F 4r✓D ...SIsT ST. oN 4 mr-mem E~ Ir aAse,
_ I
13
;X2
L,.-:
'A-e-2
� y
d- ,E.A-
z4e GQDI2J�t 7�G7tJ —�7 QJ2� -o` G�s.�(
CJ `iLcJr�tE�JL"t_.t�%
430 1 f,J 5 c
Atfl,- 6.5414
V I r , 1i 8s
59-41 14AL I FA-X �V
Luin/A,
s
� �2t-�a }�Q/ _ /%tvv// L�i�LCi! -L�� � .'LCD �•C2 -C�-
7Q� 211
J / f
iLe- �-tinL�
� � J
1� e
ALL
"61�
G
r
U
OL
4-f, 1+-0, hx
i i
a,--, lllx�
Lvo-
July 14, 1988
Dear members of the Edina City Council,
We are.writing to ask you to continue the NO TURN
south onto Halifax Avenue at 51st Street. We support
making it a permanent restriction.
At first we-weren't sure. It was a'bother to go
out to France Avenue and come back to get home, and it
was annoying to have to change our habits.
But now we are used to going around. It is well
worth it to have less traffic on Halifax. It also
seems as if there-are a lot fewer "in a big hurry"
drivers on Halifax.
If the traffic is down a lot.on Halifax, and up
only a little on neighboring residential streets, then
it looks to us as if the through traffic has been
diverted back to France or 50th where it belongs.
Please vote..to keep it there.
Sincerely,,
Mary and David Thatcher.
5309 Halifax Avenue S.
Edina, MN 55424
922-6874
� � � 1
r , •
MEMO
DATE: July 12, 1983
T_O: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
CITY OF EDINA
FROM: ROY A. LEWIS
- - - -- 4r �0i � MONTEREY AVE.
ED I NA, MN 55416-5047
REF • 40TH STREET TRAFFIC
The following issues raised in an effort to address the
traffic problems on 40th street between Natchez and Grimes
Avenues.
Police Monitoring of Tr a+? i c:
Police administration has stated that after significant
time and money has been spent monitoring traffic
in this area, have not identified a speed
problem in exzes= of other similar residential.
streets...''
It is my assertion that the validity of these
observations is in question because of the methods
used and the confusion between observation for the
purpose of gathering information and observation
for- the purpose of law enforcement.
Request: At an appropriate time and place, and
with the Chief of Police, City Engineer and
at least one Council personbpresent a meeting
be held to review the procedures used and
data collected in these traffic studies. A
formal report of the preceding of this
meeting is requested.
City of Edina:
The City of St. Louis Pars; is conducting traffic
diversicn studies and trial programs in an area
which borders Edina in the Morni.ngside area. This
effort involves the highest levels of city
government in St. Louis Park:. It also involves
the quality of life of the residents of this area,
both in St. Louis Park: and this area of Edina.
It is my understanding that the City of Edina does not
have a similar level of involvement to address the
interests of its citizens.
Request: Establish a task force consisting of the City
Engineer, at least one Council person a police
representative and area citizens for the purpose
1
of protecting the interested of the citizens of
this area of Edina.
Traffic Education:
Many of the people who use 40th street live in the
immediate area. It is in the interest of all
concerned to make efforts to maintain the quality
of Life found in our community.
It is my feeling that an education program directed
toward the users of this public street would in
part i"lprove the situation.
Request: The party's concerned work together to develop
and carry out an educational program which
involves the door -to -door and street distribution
of a hard bill detailing the problem and calling
for those concerned to cooper"ats. A'd'ditionally,
media coverage be sought to further publicize this
issue.
Signage:
The area where 40th street crater Edina is not
identified as a change in municipality. Such a
lack of i danti f i cat'i oil enhances the appearanCe of
a long thoroughfare like str etch of 40th.
It is my feeling that si.gnage identifying 40th Street
going east at Natchez is Edina and caution
children, playing would help inform drive$3of the
change in municipalities and alert them to the
presence of children and other living b ;ei ngs in
the area.
Request: The City of Edina place "Entering Edina" and
"Caution Children" signage on the southside of
40th Street between Natchez and Grimes.
2
- -_Ii
—wui_n
avWa
-S- q
VILA
z I �z
I
00
1 J-Ve-. - CPA
1
17- W--
_- _ -- M-A - tNt�1lna
- ------------- __ wn� 1u�a�tk
5oYY1 a.
r.�
Jfft-a--
%try_ G4i�rm'Hee
q �7 �, _M�w z�2_)_wna -- - --
,I_�N2.`�i'la�' _soon -ate --
pta �l�c i _ Cew� fir_ - --
ffl w
�T�af� su �m� e
��,�o nsrn�ranq�_ll
�.ya�� au acP.rvl"sttr )
rn��tJudlln 'c d-
1�mche.a►�. _befccl sar�cf
�� c mu 10 orrort a.w �
WA-
m �
_________'_-----�m�'m�°���~~�°-�~~~�-----------'------------- --'--�-----'
�
- --------------- -------
olojo
O#kL--41x-
_ -- ---'--- __- -- -_-_�-_
yi
�1
o e
ch
�y
' •' ~�bRPORNTtiO •
lees
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
KENNETH ROSLAND,
Agenda Item #
VII I. B
From:
CITY MANAGER
JOHN WALLIN,
Consent
FINANCE DIRECTOR
Information Only
❑
Date:
JULY 18, 1988
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
0
To Council
SEWER AND WATER
RATE CHANGES
Action
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
I propose to change the sewer and water rates as follows:
Sewer: $ 1.15 per 100 cu. ft.
Water: $ .42' per 100 cu. ft.
Minimum Charge: $31.40
Info /Background:
See attached memorandum.
Sewer & Water Rate Study
To: Ken Rosland, City Manager
From: John Wallin, Finance Director
Subject: Sewer and Water Rate Study
Date: July 18, 1988
Summary
The water department has received numerous complaints about the current method of
charging for sewer and water usage. Residents feel the current "tier system" is unfair and
does not charge equitably for the amounts of water and sewer used. Further, sewer and
water rates need to be increased to pay for increased costs and the proposed well and tower
to be built in 1989.
Proposal
We have conducted a study comparing sewer and water rates for the cities of St. Louis Park,
Richfield, Hopkins, and Edina's current and proposed rates. The cities were selected based
on their proximity to Edina and similar sewer charges from the Metropolitan Waste Con-
trol Commission. Graph I shows the inequities of Edina's current system as a relatively
small increase in usage can result in a much larger increase in rates. For example, an in-
crease in usage of only 100 cuft from 2000 cuft to 2100 results in an increase of the quarterly
bill from $27.10 to $39.68 whereas an increase in usage from 2100 cuft to 2200 cuft results
in an increase from $39.68 to $40.01. The proposed system, after a minimum charge to
cover fixed costs, would be based on usage. Graph II compares selected cities rates to
Edina's current and proposed rates. This analysis shows Edina's proposed rates compare
favorably with the other selected cities.
A 4 1/2% increase in sewer rates is recommended to cover increases in sewer charges. The
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has raised its collection and treatment charges
from $2,187,999 in 1987 to $2,300,759 in 1988, an increase of 5 %. Water rates need to be
raised to pay for increased costs and the proposed well and tower. A 1 cent increase in
water rates translates to an increase of approximately $30,000 of revenue. Therefore, a 9
cent increase in water rates represents approximately $270,000 of increased revenue. From
the increased revenue, approximately $200,000 would be used to pay the annual principal
and interest payment on a 10 year bond and $70,000 would be used to cover increased costs.
Sewer & Water Rate Study page _ 2
Conclusion
To alleviate-these problems, I propose to change the sewer and water rates as follows:
Current Rates, Proposed rates
Water $.33 per 100 cuft $.42 per 100 cuft
Sewer 1 cuft to 2000 cuft - $20.50 $1.15 per 100 cuft
2001 cuft to 4000 cuft - $32.75
4001 cuft to 7000 cuft $56.25
7001 cuft and over - $1.10 per 100 cuft`
Minimum
Charge
$27.10
$31.40
Graph I
City of Edina
Sewer & Water Rate Study
Current vs. Proposed Rates
Quarterly Bill in Dollars
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 500 1000 .1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Usage in Cubic Feet
Edina — Current
— • —• --• Edina — Proposed
/ '
/
/.�.
i
0 500 1000 .1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Usage in Cubic Feet
Edina — Current
— • —• --• Edina — Proposed
Quarterly Bill in Dollars
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Graph II
City of Edina
Sewer & Water Rate Study
Sample of Selected Cities
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Usage in Cubic Feet
St.Louis Pork
— — — — — Richfield
Hopkins
Edina — Current
�• —•� Edina — Proposed
APPENDIX A
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER 6 WATER RATE STUDY
JULY 1988
THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF SEWER AND WATER RATES BY SELECTED CITIES. FOR COMPARITIVE PURPOSES
WE HAVE COMPLETED A SAMPLE OF 108 RESIDENTS USING SIMILAR QUANTITIES OF WATER USED FOR ALL CITIES.
THIS ANALYSIS SHOWS EDINA'S PROPOSED RATES COMPARE FAVORABLY WITH THE OTHER CITIES RATES.
SAMPLE REVENUE
(108 RESIDENTS)
$5,206.64 $5,347.55 $5,288,80 $4,693.64 $5,135.47
CITY
OF EDINA
ST. LOUIS
PARK
RICHFIELD
HOPKINS
CURRENT RATES
PROPOSED RATES
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY
SEWER S WATER CHARGES:.
WATER:
$.84/100 CUFT
$.64/100 CUFT
$.33/100 CUFT
$.42/100 CUFT
1st 3,000 CUFT
$.489/100
CUFT
NEXT 44,000 CUFT
$.455 /100
CUFT
MINIMUM USEAGE
MINIMUM USEAGE
OVER 47,000 CUFT
$.420/100
CUFT
2,000 CUFT:
2,000 CUFT:
$6.60
$8.40
SEWER:
$.882/100
CUFT
$.67/100 CUFT
$1.12/100 CUFT
$1.15 /100 CUFT
1 TO.2,000 CUFT
$20.50
2,001 TO 4,000 CUFT
$32.75
MINIMUM USEAGE
4,001 TO 7,000 CUFT
$56.25
2,000 CUFT:
7,001 AND OVER
$1.10 /100 CUFT
$23.00
FIXED CHARGE
$6.35
$4.50
$.00
$.00
$.00
METER CHARGE
$3.92
$3.00
$.00"
$.00
$.00
SAMPLE REVENUE
(108 RESIDENTS)
$5,206.64 $5,347.55 $5,288,80 $4,693.64 $5,135.47
APPENDIX B
CITY OF -EDINA
PAGE 1 OF 2
SEWER S WATER RATE
STUDY
JULY 1988
CITY OF
EDINA
ST. LOUIS PARR
RICHFIELD
HOPKINS
CURRENT RATES
PROPOSED RATES
1200 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$5.87
$10.08
$7.68
$6.60
$8.40
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
10.58
8.04
13.44
20.50
23.00
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$26.72
$25.62
$21.12
$27.10.
$31.40
1500 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$7.34
$12.60
$9.60
$6.60
$8.40
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
13.23
10.05
16.80
20.50
23.00
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$30.84
$30.15
$26.40
$27.10
$31.40
1800 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$8.80
$15.12
$11.52
$6.60
$8.40
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00-
SEWER
15.88
12.06
20.16
20.50
23.00
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$34.95
$34.68
$311.68
$27.10
$31.40'
2000 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$9.78
$16.80
$12.80
$6.60
$8.40.
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
17.64
13.40
22.40
20.50
23.00
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$37.69
$37.70
$35.20
$27.10
$31:40
2100 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$10.27
$17.64
$13.44
$6.93
$8.82 -
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
18.52
14.07
23.52
32.75
24.15
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$39.06
$39.21
$36:96
$39.68
$32.97
3000 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$14.67
$25.20
$191.20
$9.90
$12.60
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
26.46
20.10
33.60
32.75
34.50
FIXED CHARGE.
6.35
4.50
$51.40
$52.80
$52.80
$42.65
$47.10
APPENDIX B
CITY OF EDINA
PAGE 2 OF 2
SEWER '& WATER RATE STUDY
JULY 1988
CITY OF
EDINA
ST. LOUIS PARR
RICHFIELD
HOPKINS
CURRENT RATES
PROPOSED RATES
4000 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$19.22
$33.60
$25.60
$13.20
$16.80
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
35.28
26.80
44.80
32.75
46.00
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50_
$64.77
$67.90
$70.40
$45.95
$62.80
4100 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$19.68
$34.44
$26.24
$13.53
$17.22
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
36.16
27.47
45.92
56.25
47.15
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$66.11
$69.41
$72.16
$69.78
$64.37
7000 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$32.87
$58.80
$44.80
$23.10
$29.40
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
61.74
46.90
78.40
56.25
80.50
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$104.88
$113.20
$123.20
$79.35
$109.90
7100 CUBIC FEET:
WATER
$33.33
$59.64
$45.44
$23.43
$29.82
METER CHARGE
3.92
3.00
SEWER
62.62
47.57
79.52
78.10
81.65
FIXED CHARGE
6.35
4.50
$106.22
$114.71
$124.96
$101.53
$111.47
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY
SEWER 6 WATER CHARGES:
WATER:
$.84/100 CUFT $.64
PER 100 CUFT
$.33 PER 100 CUFT
$.42 PER 100 CUFT
1st 3,000 CUFT
$.489/100 CUFT
NEXT 44,000 CUFT
$.455/100 CUFT
MINIMUM USEAGE
MINIMUM USEAGE
OVER 47,000 CUFT
$.420/100 CUFT
2,000 CUFT:
2,000 CUFT:
$6.60
$8.40
SEWER:
$.882/100 CUFT
$.67/100 CUFT $1.12
PER 100 CUFT
$1.15 PER 100 CUF
1 TO 2,000 CUFT
$20.50
2,001 TO 4,000 CUFT
$32.75
MINIMUM USEAGE
4,001 TO 7,000 CUFT
$56.25
2,000 CUFT:
7,001 AND OVER
$1.10 PER 100 CUFT
$23.00
METER CHARGE
$3.92
$3.00
$.00
$.00
$.00
FIXED CHARGE
$6.35
$4.50
$.00
$.00
$.00
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER RATE COMPARISON
St. Louis Park
Summary of Quarterly Sewer and Water Charges:
Water 0 to 3,000. Cubic Feet $.489 per. 100 Cubic Feet
3,001 to 47,000 Cubic Feet $.455 per 100 Cubic Feet
Over 47,000 Cubic Feet $.420 per 100 Cubic Feet
Sewer: $.882 per 100 Cubic Feet
Fixed Charge: $6.35
Meter Charge: $3.92
Total Sample Revenue for One Quarter 206.64
Sample includes 108 residents
I
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER RATE COMPARISON
Richfield
Summary of Quarterly Sewer and Water Charges:
Water $.84 per 100 Cubic Feet
Sewer: $.67 per 100 Cubic Feet
Fixed Charge: $4.50
Meter Charge $3.00
Total Sample Revenue for One Quarter 34 ,
Sample . includes 108 Residents
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER RATE COMPARISON
Hopkins
Summary of Quarterly Sewer and Water Charges:
Water $.64 per 100 Cubic Feet
Sewer:
Fixed Charge:
$1.12 per 100 Cubic Feet
$.00
Meter Charge $ 00
Total .Sample Revenue for One Quarter
Sample includes 108 Residents
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER RATE COMPARISON
Edina
Water $33 per 100 cuft. $.42 per 100 cuft
Sewer: 1 cuft to 2000 cuft - $20.50 $1.15 per 100 cuft
2001 cuft to 4000 cuft - $32.75
2001 cuft to 7000 cuft - $56.25
7001 cuft and over - $1.10 per 100 cuft
Meter Charge $0.00 $0.00
Minimum
Charge $27.10 $31.40
-Total Sample Revenue
for One Quarter $4,693.64
Sample includes 108 Residents
.13 .47
trt2..:tr
o @ c'I
J ,•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From. MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: JULY 15, 1988
Subject: CASH BOARD NOMINATION
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item # VTT _ c
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Earlier this year the .City received a list of member -at -large appointments
to Hennepin County committees that will.expire during 1988. The Council
was advised that the-appointments would be placed on the Council Agenda
approximate 30 days prior to expiration of terms so that if they so desired
the Council could send nominations to the Hennepin County Board.
The term of Peggy Kelly on the Community Action for Suburban Hennepin
Board (CASH) will end as of 08/26/88 per the attached list. This matter
will be on the Council's Agenda for July 18, 1988 for discussion and possible
Action.'
*Currently Announced
I
I
LENGTH OF TERM
----- - - - - -- --
2 years
4 years
4 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
2 years
i ycdrs
years
3 years
3 years
1 year
1 yea r
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
1988 SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS
MEMBERS AT LARGE
TERM ENDING
COMMITTEE /BOARD
INCUMBENT
-- --- - - -- --
101/01/88
------------------ - - - - -- - - - -- - --------- - - - - --
*CORRYCTION3 ADVISORY BOARD
--------------- -- --
John Hartsfield
Warren Limmer
Joanna Buzek
Gerald Kaplan
Dan Cain
James Just
Bruce Sabatke
Tom Lavelle
Sigmund L. Fine
01/02/88
*PERSONNEL BOARD
Barbara J. berry
Duane Elvin
01/31/88
LIBRARY BOARD
Ellen McInnis
Jack Cole
02/05/88
HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
Myrna Hammer
Thomas McMullen
Eugene Jereezek
Dan Frump
Robert Arthur
Michael Glapion
James Adams
03/08/88
MIN
Albert Lehman
Richard Miller
03/11/88
MENTAL COMMITMENT ATTORNEY PANEL ADVISORY BOARD
Jay Arneson
Susan Lentz
Wright Walling
Thomas Tinkham
Sharon Wildfang
iu�j[t /ut+
LOWER MN RIVER W/S DISTRICT
William Jaeger, Jr.
04/30/88
HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSu$ Y COUNCIL _
Ester vvilliama
06/11/88
HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
Joyce Orbuch
07/30/88
RILEY- PURGATORY -BLUFF CREEK W/S DISTRICT
Howard Peterson
08/04/88
MINORITY EMPLOYMENT AND CONTRACTING ADV C'TEE
S. Cy Jones
Beverly Grandbois
Sarah Hernandez
K. Dennis Kim
08%26%88
COMMUNITY— AGT3ON = FOR = SUBURBAN =IIENNEY IN =BOARD
VACANT
Pe99y— Ke.l.ly
Gretchen Hallowell
VACANT
VACANT
Gloria Johnson
09/17/88
HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
Len Kodet
09/29/88
NINE MILE CREEK W/S DISTRICT
Dr. Eugene Davis
12/31/88
COUNTY EXTENSION COMMITTEE
Florence Larson
Joan B. DeMeules
I
I
LENGTH OF TERM
----- - - - - -- --
2 years
4 years
4 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
2 years
i ycdrs
years
3 years
3 years
1 year
1 yea r
3 years
3 years
3 years
3 years
o e lc1
C
�r
•'��RIOM��V • �
To: COUNCIL MEMBERS
From: MAYOR COURTNEY
Date: JULY 15, 1988
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Subject: APPOINTMENT OF SCHOOL - -
BOARD REPRESENTATIVES
TO HUMAN.RELATIONS
COMMISSION
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VIT D
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action 0 Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Appointment of Nancy Atchison to fill unexpired term to 2/1/89 and appointment
of Noah Hurley to fill unexpired term to 2/1/91 with the consent of the Council
Members.
Info /Background:
The Edina. Board of Education at their meeting of July 11, 1988 voted to
appoint Nancy Atchison and Noah Hurley to the Edina Human Relations Commission
as their representatives. (See letter attached.)
W E CIA 'R E
W E,0 A R E
W E S N A R E
P U B L I C
S C H O O L S
41987
F I F T.Y F I Y E
FIFTY FIVE
W E S T 7 0 T H
T R E E T
E 0 I N A M N
5 5 4 3 5
512.944 -3613
July 12, 1988
The Honorable Wayne Courtney, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Dear Wayne.:
I am pleased to enclose copy of a resolution adopted by the Edina Board.
of Education at their meeting of July 11, 1988 appointing Nancy Atchison
and Noah Hurley to the Edina Human Relations Commission.
Sincer y
Raymo P P. Smyth
Superintendent of Schools
RPS :m j
1'cc:MDaehn -City of Edina
7/14/88 - Per phone call to .Merle Jeska, Sec. to Dr. Smyth:
Nancy Atchison to replace Judi Mollerus (unexpired term to 2/1/89)
Noah Hurley to replace Lynne Westphal (unexpired term to 2/1/91)
AN EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, July 11, 1988
Volume 60, Report 16,
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO THE EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Confirm the appointments of Nancy Atchison and Noah Hurley to the Edina
Human Relations Commission.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Board Policy #8140, adopted October 1980, states that the Chairperson of the
Board may appoint board members to serve on the Edina Park Board, Edina Planning
'Commission, Edina Human Rights Commission, and the Board of Directors of other
school - related . organizations, such appointments to be confirmed by the entire
Board of Education.
Each of the above appointees will.serve a three -year term. Both are extremely
well qualified to serve on this committee. Nancy Atchison has served on the
:Edina Board of Education for 12 years; Noah Hurley is currently the ABC advisory,
board chairman.
18
w
MEMORANDUM
Agenda Item VII.E
TO: Honorable Members of Edina City Council
Honorable Members of Housing and Redevelopment
- - Authority of Edina, Minnesota
Kenneth E., Rosland
Gordon Hughes
FROM: Jerry Gilligan
DATE: July 13, 1988
RE: 1988 Amendments to Minnesota Tax Increment Financing
Act
This memorandum supplements my letter of June 20,
1988 discussing the.1988 Amendments to the Minnesota Tax
Increment Financing Act. In my.letter I mention three provisions'
in the 1988 Amendments which may materially impact Edina's
four existing tax increment financing districts. The three
provisions are as follows:
(a) school district referendum levies;
(b) limitation on use of tax increment
after April 1, 2001 from pre - August 1,
1979 districts; and
(c) requirements that the county enforce
the four year "knockdown" provision.
The effect of these three provisions on Edina's
tax increment financing districts is as follows:
1. School District Referendum Levv.
(a) 50th and France, Southeast Edina and Grandview.
No immediate effect since tax increment bonds payable from
district were outstanding on May 1, 1988. Not clear whether
tax increment attributable to new levy or increase in levy
approved by voters of school district will be required to
be paid to district once bonds are paid.
(b) Hedberg. Any tax increments attributable
to a new levy or increase -in levy approved by voters of Richfield
School District will be required to be paid to Richfield
School District rather than to HRA.
DORSEY & `WHITNEY
- A PwNTNGYl NIY INI LL'YINO PNOYC!lIUNwL C.O N1014TIUNN
Limitation on Use of Tax Increment After April 1,
2001 From Pre - August 1, 1979 Districts.
(a) Grandview and Hedberg. Not applicable since
both are post- August 1, 1979 districts.
(b) Southeast Edina and 50th and France. No tax
increment paid from these districts after the later of (i)
April 1, 2001 or (ii) the date a non - defeased bond or'oblgiation
outstanding on April 1, 1990 secured from tax increment from
the district is no longer outstanding (but in any event not
later than August 1, 2009). Consequently, after April 1,
2001 increment from the districts can only be used to pay
or defease bonds or obligations which were outstanding on
April 1, 1990. Since in connection with the Hedberg project
it is planned that the City will issue additional tax increment
bonds payable from the Southeast Edina district, such bonds
will need to be issued prior to April 1, 1990 in order to
use tax increments to be received after April 1, 2001 from
the Southeast Edina district to pay such bonds. This may
require accelerating the issuance of some of the bonds for
the Hedberg project'. For 50th and France this change will
result in the termination of this district not later than
April 1, 2001, unless additional bonds are issued prior to
April 1, 1990.
3. Enforcement of Four Year Knockdown Provision.
(a) Southeast Edina and 50th and France. Not
applicable since pre- August 1, 1979 districts.
(b) Grandview and Hedberg. County Auditor is
now required to enforce four year knockdown provision. HRA.
will need to submit to County Auditor evidence that required
activity has.taken place within.4 year period for every parcel
in district. Evidence is to be submitted to County Auditor
by February 1 of fifth year following the year parcel was
included in district. The four year knockdown rule will
apply to certain parcels in the Grandview district, effectively
removing them from the district until development occurs
on the parcel or'adjacent street. It is not expected that
the four year knockdown rule will apply to the Hedberg district
since grading work and street work is expected to occur on
or adjacent to all parcels in the district within the four
year period.
JPG:cmn
DORSEY & WHITNEY
A Pw.. ..... Y IYCLLO P... (OY1VYwilY��
-2-
7'
f
r�
J J-
To: Kenneth Rosland
From: Craig Larsen
Date: July 18, 1988
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Subject: Administrative Services
Agreement with H.O.M.E.,
Inc.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VII. F.
Consent Fx_j
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
0 To Council
Action ❑ Motion
0 Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Adopt attached resolution authorizing Mayor and Manager execution
of Agreement
Info /Background:
The attached agreement covers our Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) Year XIV contribution to the H.O.M.E. Program. The contribution
of $19,575 was authorized by the Council on April 4, 1988. The
Agreement covers a one year funding cycle.
r
AUTHORIZING EX )TION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN
SERVICES COUNCIL AND AUTHORIZING ASSICNmENT OF AEMINISrRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES
TO HE NEPIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, the city of is an authorized subgrantee
Participant in the Urban Hennepin County Ccamuzuty Development B1ock'Grant
program by virtue of a Joint Cooperation Agreement executed between the City
and Hennepin County pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1973, Title I of Public Law 93 -383, as amended, and
WHEREAS, the City will utilize Block Grant funds to support the H.O.M.E.
Program as a public service activity in program,year XIV, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to enter into'a public service agreement
with the provider, South Hennepin Human Services Council, and
WHEREAS, the public service agreement allows the City.to assign administrative
responsibilities to another cooperating unit.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the.Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute
an agreement with South Hennepin Human Services Council to provide financial
support to the H.O.M.E. Program, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City. assigns its administrative responsibil-
ity for this program to Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and
Development.
HOME88.RES
This agreement made and entered into by and between the city of
hereinafter referred to as the "City" and South Hennepin Human
Services Council, a public service agency, hereinafter referred to as the
"Agency ", for the purpose of providing financial assistance to H.O.M.E.
(Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly), hereinafter referred to.as
the "Program".
WITNESSEIH:
WHEREAS, the City is an authorized subgrantee participant in the Urban
Hennepin County Camnunity.Development Block Grant program by virtue of a joint
cooperation agreement executed between the City and Hennepin County pursuant
to MSA 471.59, and
WHEREAS, the City has allocated Urban Hennepin County Community Develop-
ment Block Grant funds in program year , project n mtex , for the
purpose of providing support to the Program administered by the Agency.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises
contained in this Agreement, the parties hereto mutually agree to the follow-
ing terms and conditions:.
I
The City agrees to provide dollars in Urban Hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant funds to the Agency in support of the Pro-
gram-
The City reserves the right to assign administrative responsibilities pursuant
to the Community Development Block Grant Program to any other Cooperating
Unit.
II
The Agency agrees to administer the Program in accordance with the following
requirements:
1. Household Income for households receiving assistance under the pro-
gram shall not exceed 80 percent of the median household income by
household size established by the Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD). Maximum annual household income for federal
Fiscal Year 1988 shall be:
one person - $22,700.
two person - $25,900
These income figures shall remain in'effect until they are revised by
HUD:
x
2. Prior to receiving assistance fr m the program each household shall
receive, complete and submit an application (Attachment A). This
application shall remain in effect for twelve (12) months from the
date on the application. Verification of income will not be
required.
III
The Agency provides assurance that it will comply with:
1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (PL88 -352) (Nondiscrimina-
tion in programs or activities receiving federal financial assis-
tance.)
2. Section 109 of the Housing and ComM.1nity Development Act of 1974 as
amended. (Nondiscrimination in any program or activity subject to
provision of the HCDA.)
3. 00 Circular A -102 Attachment O, Section 14, paragraph (h) by assur-
ing the subgrantee, federal grantor agency, the C:arq:)troller General
of the United States or any duly authorized representative access to
all records fly Pertinent to this contract for the purpose of
making audit examinations, excerpts and transcriptions.
4. CMB Circular A -102 Attachment C.(2), and maintain all required
records for a period of three years after receiving final payment.
5. CMB Circular A -87 "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments."
IV
The Agency, prior to financial reimbursement from the City shall provide the
City with:
1. CDBG Payment Request (H.O.M.E. form)
The Agency shall retain the following completed forms in the client file:
1. Client Application. (annual)
2. Client Maintenance.Service Plan
3. Homemaker program Task Sheet
These forms are attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement. Any
changes to these forms must be mutually agreed to.
V
This Agreement is effective as of July 1, 1988, and shall continue in full
force and effect until all funds made available under this agreement have been
expended, but no later than December 31, 1989.
s ,
IN TESTIMONY WHEPMF, the parties hereto have set their hands and affixed
their seals this. day.of , 198.
Upon proper execution, CI'T'Y OF
this Agreement will be
legally valid and binding. STATE OF NIINNESOTA .
By CITY OF
Chair, South Hennepin.Human
Services Council By
Mayor
and
Executive Director, South and
Hennepin Human Services Council. City Manager
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE AGREEMENT
WITH SOUTH HENNEPIN HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL.AND.AUTHORIZING
ASSIGNMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES TO HENNEPIN COUNTY
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is an authorized subgrantee participant in the Urban
Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant program by virtue of a Joint
Cooperation Agreement executed between the City and Hennepin County pursuant
to the provisions of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1973, Title I
of Public Law 93 -383, as amended, and
WHEREAS, the City will utilize Block Grant funds to support the H.O.M.E.
Program as a public service activity in program year XIV, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary for the City to enter into a public service agreement
with the provider, South Hennepin Human Services Council, and
WHEREAS, the public service agreement allows the City to assign administrative
responsbilities to another cooperating unit;
BE IT RESOLVED,, that the Mayor and the City Manager are authorized to execute
an agreement with South Hennepin Human Services Council.to provide financial
support to the H.O.M.E. Program, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City assigns its administrative responsibility
for this program to Hennepin County through its Office of Planning and
Development.
ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 1988.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE.OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina,
do hereby certify'that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted
by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 18, 1988 and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19th day of July, 1988.
City Clerk.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER
From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK
Date: JULY 14, 1988
Subject: TEMPORARY ON -SALE 3.2
LICENSE - CHURCH OF
ST. PATRICK OF EDINA
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VII•G
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
To Council
Action Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Approval of a temporary on -sale 3/2 beer license for Church of St. Patrick
of Edina for October'15, 1988.
Info /Background:
The Church of St. Patrick of Edina has submitted an application for a
temporary on -sale 3.2 beer license for October 15, 1988 in connection
with a polka mass, dinner and dancing to be held from 5 p.m. to 10 p.m.
The application has been reviewed by the Police Department and approval
has been given by Police Chief Swanson. The City will be named as an
added insured under the liquor liability insurance for the Archdiocese
of St. Paul /Minneapolis which also covers St. Patrick's Church.
201013 07/12/88 -
LI_�i 201013 07/12/88
201013 07/12/88
I'v
aw
201026
07/12/88
201026
1968 CITY
OF EDINA
1,440.10
BADGER METER INC
CHECK
REGISTER
40 -1220- 000 -00 542508
07 -18 -68
PACE 1 i
y,
201028
NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A
MESSAGE
411
_CHECK
07/12/88
201028
07/12/88
201028
_
07/12/88 -
� I
1 D101�—
�TYt2J8
65.758----
AUT"ACHINE- SUPPLY
1�0469S284 @8
10 4608 --e8+ 28
x
i_.
•�� * *+
COST OF
GOODS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
201031
07/12/88
*o*-CKS
19
- -- 50- 4630 - 842 -84 - - -- - - -
I5
201033
07/12/88
COST OF
50- 4630- 842 -84
_
E01004
07%1£/S8
53.01—
AMERICAN
LINEN - --
- -- LAUNDRY
- 10 =426E= 440 -44
140607 - -
- -- -
,,�
50- 4630 - 862 -86 -
201004
07/18/88
349.36
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
10- 4262- 5EO -52
8
�^
- - --
201004
07/12/88
23.32
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
10-4262-628 -62
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
=
201004
07/12/88
66.41
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
30 -4262- 782 -78
138906
201004
07/12/68
66.41
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
30- 4262- 782 -78
138906
8
201004
07/12/88
63.57
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
30- 4262 - 782 -78
137006
201004
_
07/12/88
66.14
AMERICAN
LINEN
-- - LAUNDRY - - -- " -"
- 30- 4262 - 782 -78
138906
-
a„
a
201004
07/12/88
66.41-
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAJUNDRY
30- 4262 - 782 -78
138906
201004
07/12/88
66.14-
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
30- 426E - 782 -78
138906
201004
07/12/88
_
22.49
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
'50- 4262- SE1 -82
117607
-
201004
07/12/88
19.57
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4262- 841 -84
142907
201004
07/12/88
25.72
AMERICAN
LINEN
LAUNDRY
50 -4EGE- 861 -86
121007
`
_ —_ 623:45 -+
- -
-- -
-- - - - - -------
-------- - - - - --
- - - --
** ** **
*** -CKS
201008
07/12/88
30.46
KAMAN BEARING 6
SPLY REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 520 -52
30.46 •
201013 07/12/88 -
LI_�i 201013 07/12/88
201013 07/12/88
0
* ** -CKS
71. SO— - -- - ALTERNATOR REBUILD -_ GEN SUPPLIES -- - 10- 4504 - 420 -42 1566
137.36 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 1564
173.28 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 1565
382.52 -i -- - - - - - --
l
I'v
aw
201026
07/12/88
201026
07/12/88
1,440.10
BADGER METER INC
INV WATER
METER
40 -1220- 000 -00 542508
4
y,
201028
07/12/88
i.,.
201028
07/12/88
201028
07/12/88
411
201028
07/12/88
201028
07/12/88
201028
_
07/12/88 -
*** -CKS
"
2,261.85
BEER WHOLESALERS
40
GOODS
27- 4630- 663 -66
* * * * **
1,323.10
4W
COST OF
GOODS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
201031
07/12/88
COST OF
-- - " -
- -- 50- 4630 - 842 -84 - - -- - - -
I5
201033
07/12/88
0
* ** -CKS
71. SO— - -- - ALTERNATOR REBUILD -_ GEN SUPPLIES -- - 10- 4504 - 420 -42 1566
137.36 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 1564
173.28 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580- 560 -56 1565
382.52 -i -- - - - - - --
l
4
* ** -CKS
1,440.10
BADGER METER INC
INV WATER
METER
40 -1220- 000 -00 542508
4
1,257.35
BADGER METER INC
REPAIR
PARTS
40- 4540 - 807 -80 542196
E.697.45�
--- -. -..-
-.. -_-
*** -CKS
2,261.85
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF
GOODS
27- 4630- 663 -66
1,323.10
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF
GOODS
50- 4630 - 822 -82
- -- 2.10-
BEER WHOLESALERS--------
COST OF
-- - " -
- -- 50- 4630 - 842 -84 - - -- - - -
2.10
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF
50- 4630- 842 -84
2,591.60
BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF
GOODS
50- 4630- 842 -84
2,222.35 - - -
-- -BEER WHOLESALERS
COST OF
GOODS SOLD-
50- 4630 - 862 -86 -
8,398.90 *
- - --
- - -
-- -
-- - - - - - -
-- *** -CKS
172.59
BERTELSON BROS INC
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
* ** -CKS
172.50
BERCFORD TRUCKING
COST OF
GOODS
50- 4626- 822 -82
41 201090 07/12/88 54.97 CERT POWER TRAIN REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 35407 _- •
-5I 201090077i2/8 20.-1 CERT -POWER -TRAIN -- REPAIR PART 10- 4540 =
201158 07/12/88 455.00 FEED RITE CONTROL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 105630
201158 07/12/88 60:00= FEED - RITE - CONTROL - -- REPAIR PARTS" — " - - -- 40- 4540 - 805 -80 60560" -
=� 201158 07/12/88 360.00- FEED RITE CONTROL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 60490
to c
c
e
c
c
c
c
c
s
c
c
198'8 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -18 -88
PAGE 3
V
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. R
MESSAGE
201091
07/12/88
12.87
CITY OF EDINA
WATER
10 -4258- 440 -44
12.87
°
r ** -CKS
201099
07/12/88
193.46
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
31978
193.46 •
rrrr *r
.
* ** -CKS
201110 -
07/12/88
- 144.45
DAVIDSEN DIST INC -
COST OF GOODS -
- -" 50- 4630 - 842 -84
r
144.45 •
* *r *r*
*** -CKS
201125
07/12/88
461.70
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 365 -30
19466
201125
07/12/88
318.00
MERIT SUPPLY
ACCESSORIES
10 -4620- 560 -56
19460
201125
07/12/88
486.10
MERIT SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
19508
.►
1,265.80 •
**rrr•
***-CKS
201134
07/12/88
-- — 36.75
- CITY - WIDE - SERVICES -- -
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
- "" 50 -4248- 841 -84
-"
36.75 r
201135
67/12/88
3.57=
EAGLE WINE CO.
CASH DISCOUNT
50- 3710 - 003 -00
-
201135
07/12/88
3.57-
EAGLE WINE CO.
CASH DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 003 -00
s..-
201135
07/12/88
3.57
EAGLE WINE CO.
CASH DISCOUNT
50- 3710- 003 -00
201135
07/12/88
- 34.54 - --
EAGLE WINE CO. -- - -'
COST OF GOODS" -
-' 50-4632- 822 -82
87686
201135
07/12/88
178.55
EAGLE WINE CO.
COST OF GOODS
50 -4632- 862 -86
•
i
209.52 •
* *r * **
*o*-CKS
201138
07/72/88 -
ED PHILLIPS & SONS - - -- "COST
OF GOODS - - -
" -- 50- 4630- S22 -82
202839 -
13.65
201138
07/12/88
31.50
ED PHILLIPS 6 SONS
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630- 842 -84
202836
201138
07/12/88
59.50
ED PHILLIPS 6 SONS
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630 - 862 -86
202844
-
104.65
- -- -
-
:'
*** *r*
•r* -CKS
201143
07/12/86
207.32
EMRICH BAKING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
27 -4624- 663 -66
�_
207.32 •
* ** * *r
r** -CKS
I. --
�- ,
201148
07/i2788
100:78
EIVIN" SAFETY SUPPLY - - ---GEN
SUPPLIES-- " - - -
- -- 10-4504-646-64------------
-
100.78 •
d
��*rii - --
-- - - - - -- - -
- -- - - -- - --
— - -
* ** -CKS
201158 07/12/88 455.00 FEED RITE CONTROL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 105630
201158 07/12/88 60:00= FEED - RITE - CONTROL - -- REPAIR PARTS" — " - - -- 40- 4540 - 805 -80 60560" -
=� 201158 07/12/88 360.00- FEED RITE CONTROL REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 805 -80 60490
to c
c
e
c
c
c
c
c
s
c
c
1988
OF EDINA
CHECK
STER
07 -18 -8,
iGE 4
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. M
MESSAGE
�.:
35.00 •
rrrwwr
rrr -CK8
201188
07/12/88
220.78
-
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 801 -80
742325
220.78
- -
rrwwwr
-
wrr -CK8
201194
07/12/88
19.00
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 301 -30
28637
201194
07/12/88
266.25
GENERAL COMMUNICATNS
RADIO SERVICE
10 -4294- 560 -56
28636
285.25 * -
-
-
wrwrrw
rrw -CKS
201206
07/12/88
366.86
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
201206
07/12/88
165.55
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 560 -56
201206
__
07/12/88
- 132.84 -
G 6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
201206
07/12/88
136.80
G 3 K SERVICES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 540 -54
201206
07/12/88 --
36.00
G A K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
28- 4262- 702 -70
201206
07/12/88
351.60
C 6 K SERVICES
LAUNDRY - -
40- 4262 - 801 -80
1,189.65 r
-
rrrr *�
- - -- -
---- - - - - --
- - - -- -- - - - -- - - - - -_
-- - - -- - - -. - - - - - - -- --
-
000-CKS
- -
201209
07/12/88
24.37
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540- 560 -56
66323
201209
07/12/88
45.99
GENUINE PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
67894
70.36 •
-
- -
--
- -- -- -- - - --
-- -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- --
- -- - - - - --
--
*00-CKS
- - --
201228
07/12/88
_ 15.99
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 301 -30
34896
201228
07/12/88
_
426.90-
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS =
10- 4540 - 560 -56-
201228
07/12/88
2,706.06
MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
2,295.15 r
wrr -CKS
201234
07/12/88
- 3.71
HOOTEN CLEANERS
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 420 -42
�.
3.71 •
j"
- rrr4r�
- - - - - -- - -
- - -- - - -_ _ ------- - - - -
-- - - -- - - --
- -- -- -
rwr -CKS
--
201238
07/12/88
9.00
-
YM H MCCOY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 314 -30
121602
9.00 i
-
171
rrwrrr
rrr -CK8
201248
07/12/88
325.35
HARMON CLASS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
10 -4248- 560 -56
159173
325.35 r
rrrrrr
**o-CKS
° -i
201278
07/12788
28:25
JERRYS -FOODS
--- MEETIN8 EXP --
10 -4206- 140 -14
-- -- - - -
201278
07/12/88
16.76
JERRYS FOODS
MEETING EXP
10 -4206- 140 -14
y
I
1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -18 -88
PACE 5
yl
CHECK NO.
DATE _
_AMOUNT
_ VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. M
MESSAGE
�f l
201278
07/12/88
120.96
JERRYS FOODS
CEN SUPPLIES
10 -4504- 440 -44
201278
07/12/88
25.00
JERRYS FOODS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
10 -4512- 440 -44
190.97 r
v
+r +rrr
rs* -CKS
y
201286
07/12/88
142.03
JUSTUS LUMBER
CEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 782 -78
142.03 •
+ + + + **
* ** -CKS
`
201302
07/12/88 -
-- - 6,096.98 - - -
-- KUETHER -DIET CO
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630- S22 -82
201302
07/12/88
8,934.65
KUETHER DIST CO
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630- 842 -84
15,031.63 s
s +sr *r
s ** -CKS
201304 - --
-.- 07/12/88
- 170.67
- KNOX- LUMBER CO.
GEN SUPPLIES. - - -- —
- 23- 4504 - 612 -61
636180
201304
07/12/88
30.66-
KNOX LUMBER CO.
CEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 612 -61
636181
I -
140.01 - + --
- --
- -- - - -- --
v
* ** -CKS
201309
- 07/12/88 - --
— 120.00 -
-- LIEN INFECTION CON -
PROF SERVICES - - - -
- -- 10 -4201- 630 -62
201309
07/12/88
E7.50
LIEN INFECTION CON
PROF SERVICES
E7- 4201 - 663 -66
147.50 r
�:,i
ses +rr
++* -CKS
201311
07/12/88 --
- 6,815.45
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE - -
COST OF GOODS - -- -
-- 50- 4630 - 822 -82
4w
201311
07/12/88
12,130.95
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630- 842 -84
201311
07/12/88
12,187.10
EASTSIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
50- 4630 - 862 -86
310133.50 �-
- - -
�r
+ses +s
r*+ -CKS `
201315
07/12/88
441.43
ANCHOR PAPER
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
441.43 s
-
+++ +++
sss -CKS
201323 —
— 07/12/88 - --
-- — -40.80
LINHOFF------ "
PHOTO SUPPLIES -
10- 4508- 440 -44
134179
•
201323
07/12/88
6.75
LINHOFF
PHOTO SUPPLIES
10 -4508- 440 -44
134052
47.55 +
*so-CKS
--
201325
07/12788
- 269:34
LONG -LAKE- FORD TRCTR ""
REPAIR PARTS - -- - - -
- 10- 4540 - 560 -56
69353 -
r
269.34 +
+ +r *es
s *+ -CKS
201329
07/12/88
2,160.00
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 801 -80
16056
201329
07712/88
800:00
LAYNE- MINNESOTA -CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS —
-40- 4248 - 801 -80
16066 - -
-
•
201329
07/12/88
4,800.00
LAYNE MINNESOTA CO
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40- 4248- 801 -80
16055
�
,
i
1988 Cl jF EDINA CHECK R. fER 07 -18 -88 E 6
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE
11,760.00 •
•rrrr•
07/12/88
7,704.50
MARK
VII
SALES
COST
OF GOODS
201344
07/12/88
4.50
MED OXYGEN 6 EQUIP
EQUIP
MAINT
10- 4274 - 440 -44
881829
201344
07/12/88
80.84
MED OXYGEN & EQUIP
EQUIP
MAINT
10 -4274- 440 -44
88183
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
85.34 s
GOODS
50- 4630- 822 -82
37,330.41 w
•rrrr•
370.00 •
201358
07/12/88
139.73
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM
SERV
23- 4304 - 612 -61
61907
201356
07/12/88
110.94 - -
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM
SERVICE
28- 4304 - 702 -70
61782
201358
07/12/88
151.32
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM
SERVICE
50- 4304 - 821 -82
61910
J 201358
07/12/88
164.47
NATL GUARDIAN SYST
ALARM
SERVICE
50- 4304 - 861 -86
61909
ADVERTISING PERS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
566.46 •
COST
OF
GOODS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
~ ssssrt
1--1781-. 50 •
- --
- -
-
201360
07/12/88
174.00
MINNESOTA WANNER
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
10 -4248- 322 -30
69704
174.00 •
••
•swrwr
,. •rssrs
•s• -CKS
201366
07/12/88-
216.30 --
-- MINNESOTA BAR -
COST
OF GOODS
50- 4632- 822 -82
-
201366
07/12/88
281.40
MINNESOTA BAR
COST
OF GOODS
50- 4632- 842 -84
201366
07/12/88
405.78
MINNESOTA BAR
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
50- 4632- 862 -86
903.48
•rrssr
•rr -CKS
•r r -CKS
••• -CKS
••• -CKS
rwr -CKS
201378
07/12/88
7,704.50
MARK
VII
SALES
COST
OF GOODS
50- 4630- 822 -82
~ 201378
07/12/88
13,749.46
MARK
VII
SALES
COST
OF GOODS
50- 4630- 842 -84
201378
_ __
07/12/88
_
15,876.45
MARK
VII
SALES
COST
OF GOODS SOLD
50- 4630- 862 -86
GOODS
50- 4630- 822 -82
37,330.41 w
370.00 •
- - -
- -- - - -- --
- - -- -- -
-- - - - - - - sss-CKS
—
201380
07/12/88
15,591.03
THOMSEN
NYBECK
PROF
SERVICES
10- 4201 - 220 -22
GOODS
- --
- - - -15, 591.03
201389
07/12/88
654.50
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST
201381
07/12/88
83.86
STAR
TRIBUNE
201389
ADVERTISING PERS
10- 4212 - 510 -51
83.86 •
wrwswr
rw• -CKS J
`,•�
201385
07/12/88
370.00
MAYO DIST
COST
OF
GOODS
50- 4630- 822 -82
J
370.00 •
rssrwr
rr• -CKS
201389
07/12/88
382.50
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST
OF
GOODS
50- 4632 - 822 -82
201389
07/12/88
654.50
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST
OF
GOODS
50-4632 - 842 -84
201389
07/12/88
744.50
NORTHSTAR ICE
COST
OF
GOODS
50- 4632 - 862 -86
1--1781-. 50 •
- --
- -
-
- - --
- -
~
••
•swrwr
•s• -CKS
1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
07 -18 -88
PAGE 7
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. N
MESSAGE
201396
07/12/88
1,37e.89
NORTHWESTERN BELL
AIR COND
E5- 4946- 520 -5e
A495E8
1,372.89 s
v
ss\ss*
*** -CKS
r;
e014e0
07/le/88
334.30
OLD DUTCH FOODS
COST OF GOOD
SOLD
e7 -46e4- 663 -66
334.30*
r
rrrrrs
* **-CKS
2a1486
381.45
APER SUPP4J "O
COST Or GOaD3
rn eaia Bee Be
r *\-CKS
ow
201429
07/14/88
381.45
Pepsi Cola Bottling
Cost of Goods
50- 4632- 822 -82
e01429
07/12/88
3,033.55
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
e7 -46e4- 663 -66
201429
- 07/12/88 -
-- 741.00 --
- PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS
50- 4632- 84e-84
"-
�,
201429
07 /1e /88
436.30
PEPSI COLA BOTTLING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
50- 463E- 86E -86
-4 1 Lai O-BT •
4,592.30
* \* \ \\
** *-CKS
e01434 —
- 07 /1e /8S - -
-- 39.00
PRINTERS SERVICE INC "__ -" -EQUIP
MAINT
-
- e8 -4e74- 704 -70
27186 "
39.00
-
- _ - -
- - - -- -- - - -- - - -
- - -- - - -- -- - -
-- - -
- _ __
- - - -- - - - --
* \* -CKS
v
2-01469
07/12/88
456.e0
ROAD MACHINERY
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
22669
-- 456.e0 -s
-- - - --
si * * \\
- - -
- - - -
- - - -
*** -CKS
201475
07/12/88
251.14
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
53434
e51.14 r
* ** -CKS
e01480 --
- 07/12/88
- - 18.75
R T W --
INSURANCE
10- 4260 - 510 -51
"
r
18.75 r
000-CKS
e01 49e
07/12-/68
149.91
SOUTHDALE FORD
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
180119
149.91
— - - -- — - -
-
201493
07/le/88
6,688.90
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
COST OF GOODS
50- 4630 - Se2-Se
e01493 --
— 07 /1e /S8-
_13,8e3.95
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC -- -COST
OF GOODS
- -" -
50- 4630- 84e -84
- - - --
r,
e01493
07/12/88
339.00
SOUTHSIDE DIST COINC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
50- 4630- 862 -86
20,851.85
�•,
rssiri
*** -CKS
�_'�
201502-
07/12/88
SUBURBAN - CHEVROLET-
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
914ee — - --
110.. -00
e01502
07/1e/88
63.31
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
91461
1
1988
OF EDINA
CHECK
.STER
07 -18 -8
AGE 8
�.
CHECK
N0. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N
MESSAGE
201502
07/12/88
4.6E
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
91385
201502
07/12/88
12.38
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
REPAIR PARTS
10 -4540- 560 -56
91397
190.31
r
201503
07/12/88
26.52
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 646 -64
132532
201503
07/12/88
22.98
SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP
REPAIR PARTS
40- 4540 - 803 -80
132373
49.50
•
1
201504
07/12/88
33.55
SYSTEM SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 510 -51
70051
33.55
•
•rr•••
-
rr• -CKS
201511
07/12/88
30.95
SOUTHERN VACUUM
SERVICE CUSTODIANS
50- 4236 - 821 -82
30.95
•
•rrr••
•r• -CKS
y
201523
07/12/88
2,776.57
STATE TREASURER
BLDG PERMITS
10- 3095 - 000 -00
201523
07/12/88
134.00
STATE TREASURER
SURTAX
10- 3113 - 000 -00
2,910.57
rr•rrr
rr• -CKS
201525
07/12/88
130.00
3 M CO
SIGNS A POSTS
10- 4542 - 325 -30
77552
130.00
r
J
••••••
••• -CKS
t
201537
07/12/88
- 296 -.00
TRI- STATE -PUMP - -
- - -- -PROF SERVICES
- 26 -4201- 682 -68
83955
.,
296.00
r
••••••
-
•rr -CKS
y
201542
07/12/88
15,022.95
THORPE DIST
COST OF GOODS SOLD
50- 4630- 862 -86
-- - --
-- - -- - -
- - -- 15,022.95
• -- - - - - -_
___ - -- - --
-
•••••r
r•r -CKS
201563
07/12/88
213.29
VERSATILE VEHICLES
REPAIR PARTS
27- 4540 - 665 -66
213.29
•
•••r•r
••r -CKS
201569
07/12/86
121.30
VALLEY INDUSTRIAL
GASOLINE -
28- 4612 - 704 -70
^i
121.30
•
- - -- - -
-- - - - - -- - - - - -- - -- - - - -
-- -- -- - - -- - - --
- -- - -
• • r -CKS
201572
07/12/88
_ 436.90
VAN PAPER CO
PAPER SUPPLIES
10- 4514 - 520 -52
212254
I'
201572
07/12/88
64.92
VAN PAPER CO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50- 4516 - 820 -82
201572
07/12/.88
64.93
VAN PAPER CO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50- 4516 - 840 -84
`
201572
07/12/88
64.93
VAN PAPER CO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
50- 4516 - 860 -86
v
- --
631.68
W_ -- - -- - - -�--
- - -- -
-.
rr•N•
••• -CKS
1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -18 -88 PAGE 9
�I
CHECK NO. DATE VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. R MESSAGE
201582 07/12/88 392.64 GORDON SMITH CO GASOLINE 27 -4612- 664 -66 1742
392.64 +
r + ++ ++ +++ -CKS
^ 201586 07/12/88 49.85 W W GRAINGER GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 560 -56 262717
201586 07/12/88 29.18 W W GRAINGER GEN SUPPLIES 40-4504- 801 -80 860945
79.03
+ + +r ++ + ++ -CKS
r 201597 07/12/88 48.89 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY EQUIP 30- 4642 - 781 -78 547288
48.89 •
«
+ + +s +r
+rr -CKS
201700 - -
- -- 07/12/88 -
- -- 168.00-
- -GENE DAVIS - --
PROF SERVICE - -
- 10 -4201- 600 -60
-
i,
201700
07/12/88
23.17
GENE DAVIS
MILEAGE
10 -4208- 600 -60
191.17
+
y,..
201701
07/12/88
32.40
AMER RED CROSS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 625 -62
15820
32.40
+
201702
07/12/88
22.60
J 6 F REDDY RENTS
GEN SUPPLIES
26- 4504 - 682 -68
35558
22.60
+
rr..
201703
07/12/88
660.00
CLEAN -FLO LAB
WEEDS
10- 4242 - 358 -30
4546
860.00
+
201704
07/12/88
9.35
CRICKET PHOTO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 200 -20
50376
-
9.35
+
r,
201705
07/12/88
75.00
PUBLICITY CENTRAL
PROF SERVICES
30- 4201 - 781 -78
1705
- 201- -705
- - -- - -
07/12/88
25.00
PUBLICITY CENTRAL
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 781 -78
315
- - - - - --
- 100.00
- - --
201706
07/1.2/88
300.00
NO LIGHTER PYRO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 509 -50
300.00
+ -
-- -
-
r
201707
07/12/88
50.00
MTKA POL RESERVE ASN
PROFESSIONAL SERV
10 -4201- 508 -50
- 50.00
-- - - - -.. - - --
-
201708
07/12/88
105.00
IMPRINTER$
PRNTING
10- 4600 - 180 -18
88 -61
05.00
, - -
-- - -
201709
07/12/88
21.00
SUSAN WOHLRABE
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 140 -14
-- -21.00
+
- - -- -
201710
07/12/88
57.32
-
BLMGT FREEWAY DODGE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
70897
57.32
•
--
201711
07/12/88
114.20
CARLSON LK ST EQUIP
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
38622
2017f1
07/12/88 -
-10:99
CARLSON-LK-ST EQUIP " -
"REPAIR PARTS - ---
10- 4540 - 560 -56 -38374
- -- - - -
,�
125.19
+
r
1988 l
OF EDINA
CHECK 3TER
07 -18 -86 GE 10
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV.
0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE
201712
07/12/88
16.29
TOWN 6 COUNTRY DODGE
REPAIR PARTS
10- 4540 - 560 -56
37251
16.29 +
201713
07/12/88
33.30
MIDWAY INDUS SUPPLY
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 325 -30
69975
33.30 •
L
201714
07/12/88
130.00
DICK 6 RICKS AUTO
ACCESSORIES
10 -4620- 560 -56
130.00 r
..
•rr•••
•r• -CKS
201716
07/12/88
350.00
MY CADDIE
PROF SERVICES
27- 4201 - 662 -66
350.00 +
201717
07/12/88
205.65
BLMGT GARDEN CENTER
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
205.65 •
201718
07/12/88
84.15
FRANCIS CALLAHAN
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 480 -48
84.15 +
=
• +•srr
••• -CKS
201720
07/12/88
33.69
JOHN KEPRIOS
CONF 6 SCHOOL
10 -4202- 600 -60
33.69 •
201721
07/12/88
53.30
LYLE AXT
COST OF GOODS SOLD
29- 4624- 722 -72
53.30 +
201722
07/12/88 -
- 7.50 "
NATL -REC- 6- -PARK ASN -- -
CONF 6 SCHOOL -- - - --
26- 4202 - 681 -68
- - -- -"
7.50 •
201723
07/12/88
243.70
GRAPHIC PROD
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 600 -60
257336
243.70 •
-
•••+ **
- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -
- - - --- - --
- - - -- -- -- - -- - - --
- -- - - - -- -
- - - - -- - - - - - -- - - -- -
-- -- - - - - •+t -CKS
201725__
07/12/88
-- 85.00
--
MPSA
CONF 6 SCHOOL
10 -4202- 600 -60
85.00
-
rr•••+
••• -CKS
201728
07/12/88
46.00
MSARSHALL 6 SWIFT
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 200 -20
46.00 •
201729
07/12/88
24.00
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
MEETING EXP
10- 4206 - 140 -14
24.00 +
201730
07/12/88
16.04
RALPH CAMPBELL
MEETING EXP
10 -4206- 140 -14
16.04 +
201731
07/12/88
81.25
NO COUNTRY FLAGS
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52
5242
81.25 +
201732
07/12/88
36.04
PHOTO FAST
ADVERTISING OTHER
23 -4214- 611 -61
29494
1'968 CITY OF EDINA
I
CHECK REGISTER 07 -18 -88 PAGE 11
l
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE
36.04
•
201733
07/12/88
73.70
NORCOSTCO
GEN SUPPLIES
23- 4504 - 611 -61
30220
73.70
•
201734
07/12/88
50.00
NANCY HEMSTAD
ART COMMISSION -
30- 3501 - 000 -00
r.
50.00
r
_
201735
07/12/88
270.00
MICHON HERBST
ART COMMISSION
30- 3501- 000 -00
r
270.00
•
201736
07 /i2 /88 -
100.00
- - --
PAT'GREER - --
ART COMMISSION - -
30- 3501 - 000 -00
100.00
•
201737
07/12/88
76.00
EDINA ART CENTER
ART COMMISSION
- 30- 3501 - 000 -00
76.00
r
201738
07/12/88
_ _ -- - 95.00
--
MRPA - - - - -- -
CONF & SCHOOL
10 -4202- 600 -60
95.00
r
201739
07/12/88
63.52
DALE LUNDGREN
MILEAGE _ -
30 =4208- 781 -78
Nw
63.52
r
201740
07712/88
- 490.00
— PEAK- CONSTR. - -- - - - --
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
-" 10 -4248- 646 -64
- - -- - - -
490.00
r
201741
07/12/88 -
-- - - - - -- 10.20
- - - "
-- ECOLAB - -
SERV CONTRACT EO - -- -
- -30 -4285- 781 -78
10.20
•
_
201742
07/12/88
-18.00
JEANNE- LABORE - -- - -- -
- SEASON TICKETS
- 26 -3415- 000 -00
--
18.00
r
- - -- - - - -
"-
- -- - --
- -
-
•rr-CKS
201744
07/12/88
251.25
MURRAY SANDLER
GEN SUPPLIES
ES- 4504 - 702 -70
107 -
- - -
-- --
251:25
i
y
201745
07/12/88
101.48
LOWELL MCCARTHY
MILEAGE
10 -4EO8- 621 -62
-
201745
07/12/88 -
- - " -- 101.48- ------
- LOWELL MCCARTHY
MILEAGE -
- -..10- 4208- 624 -62
r
201745
07/12/86
101.48
LOWELL MCCARTHY
MILEAGE
10- 4208- 624 -62
101.48
r
201746
07/12/88
1,275.00
DOUG LEW
ART COMMISSION
30- 3501 - 000 -00
1,275.00
r
^I
201747
07/12/68
675.67
ACCOUNTEMPS
PROF SERVICES
10 -4201- 160 -16
60481
201747
07/12/88
909.57
ACCOUNTEMPS
PROF SERVICES
40 -4201- 800 -80
-
60481
I.'
201747
- 07/12/88
76.04
'ACCOUNTEMPS - - -- -- - -
-- PROF SERVICES — " --
- 50- 4201- 820 -82
60481
201747
07/12/88
76.04
ACCOUNTEMPS
PROF SERVICESW
50 -4201- 840 -84
60481
201747
07/12/88
76.04
ACCOUNTEMPS
PROF SERVICES
50 -4E01- 860 -86
60481
1,813.36
-
-- _
201748
07/12/88
3,532.19
S ELLIOT HENDRICKSON
PROF SERVICES
40 -4201- 800 -80
E278
3,53e_. 19
i
- -- - -- - -- -- —
- - - - --
- -- -- - - - - -
- - -
201749
07/12/88
4,500.00
PAVEMENT MGMT SYS
PROF SERVICES
10- 4201 - 260 -26
7390 -
r
�
1
1988
OF EDINA
CHECK .STER
07-18-89' 'AGE 12
vj
lI
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. • P.O. N MESSAGE
'
4,500.00 •
201750
07/12/88
11190.00
MCCAREW DESIGNS
CONTRACTED SERV
30- 4200 - 782 -78
`
201750
07/12/88
970.00
MCCAREW DESIGNS
CONTRACTED SERV
30- 4200 - 782 -78
2,160.00 •
201751
07/12/88
135.70
UNITOG RENTAL SERV
GEN SUPPLIES
10-4504- 482 -48
320131 6
135.70 +
201752
07/12/88
32,400.00
DELANO ERICKSON ARCH
CONST IN PROGRESS
2S- 1300 - 000 -00
32,400.00 s
201753
07/12/88
54.95
BR BENSON
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
54.95 •
201754
07/12/88
984.12
EH RENNER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
27 -4248- 664 -66
984.12 •
201755
07/12/88
531.50
DIXIE PETRO CHEM INC
CHEMICALS
26- 4564- 682 -68
290575
531.50 •
Y
201756
07/12/88
6.08
COLLEEN PAULUS
MILEAGE
10- 4208 - 480 -48
6.08 s
201757
07/12/88
273.79
JERRYS ENT
ADVERTISING OTHER
50 -4214- 860 -86
273.79 •
'
201758
07/12/88
9,801.00
METRO WASTE CONTROL
BLDG PERMITS
10- 3095 - 000 -00
9,801.00 •
1
1,
201759
07/12/88
101.75
METRO PICTURE FRMG
GEN SUPPLIES
30- 4504 - 781 -78
7597
101.75 •
f
201760
07/12/88
130.00
OLYMPIC POOLS
PROF SERVICES
30 -4201- 783 -78
1691
130.00 s
201761
07/12/88
647.69
MPLS FINANCE DEPT
UNALLOCATED CONSTR C
60 -1270- 000 -00
34239
647.69 s
�.
201762
07/12/88
318.39
MN CELLULAR TEL
EQUIP RENTAL
10- 4226 - 420 -42
318.39 •
201763
07/12/88
5,009.40
COLLINS ELEC CO.
CONTRACTS PAYABLE
60 -2040- 000 -00
5,009.40 s
.:71
ssssss
sss -CKS
201765
--- 07/12/88
-- 39:60 —
—TERRY ANN SALES - " ""
GEN SUPPLIES — -- --
27- 4504 - 662 -66
- -- -
�'
201765
07/12/88
398.25
TERRY ANN SALES
GEN SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 663 -66
437.85 s
201766
07/12/88
41.15
ROGERS CABLE TV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
41.15 s
6
201767
07/12/88
11000.00
PETER COTTON
ADVERTISING PERSNL
10 -4212- 510 -51
`V
•
201775
07/12/88
35.00
EDWARD LANCELLO
GEN SUPPLIES
I,
1988 CITY
OF EDINA
CHECK REGISTER
•
07 -18 -88 PAGE 13
v`
CHECK NO.
DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE
.r! =
SALES
OTHER
1,000.00
- -- - --
24.39
201768
07/12/88
80.00
LOLA EDMON
PROF SERVICES
27 -4201- 662 -66
.,
07 /12 /8B
315.00
80.00 •
REN MING
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
201769 - - - -
-- 07/12/88 " - -
" -- -- 657.50 - - - --
-ADS TO GO -
ADVERTISING OTHER--------
- 50-4214-822-Se --
^
201769
07/12/88
657.50
ADS TO GO
ADVERTISING OTHER
50- 4214 - 842 -84
201769
07/12/88
657.50
- --
ADS TO GO
-
ADVERTISING OTHER
50 -4214- 862 -86
21.70
•
1,972.50 •
-
201770_
07/12/88
--
45.38
-
NERCO DISTR
COST OF GOODS SOLD
26- 4624- 683 -68
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
45.38 - -
- - -- -- - - - -- - --
31.50
201780
07/12/88
128.10
BARBARA LUNDGREN
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
• *r -CKS
`
201772
07/12/88
32.00
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
PROF SERVICES
26- 4201 - 682 -68
- - - - - - - -
-- - - - --
- - - 32.0 0 •
87.50
MARGARET MCDOWELL
_
201773
07/12/88
112.00
DUANE W NIELSEN CO
PROF SERVICES
26 -4201- 682 -68 1541
112.00 •
201782
�I
201774
07/12/88
1,181.04
LABOR RELATIONS ASSN
PROF SERVICES
10 -4201- 140 -14
1,181.04 •
•
201775
07/12/88
35.00
EDWARD LANCELLO
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 390 -30
35.00
•
201776
07/12/88
24.39
ANN WIDERSTROM
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
- -- - --
24.39
201777
07 /12 /8B
315.00
REN MING
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
315.00
•
201778
07/12/88
21.70
NORMA HANLON
SALES
OTHER
23-3625- 000 -00
21.70
•
201779
07/12/88
31.50
KAY SCHLOSSER
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
31.50
201780
07/12/88
128.10
BARBARA LUNDGREN
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
201781
07/12/88
87.50
MARGARET MCDOWELL
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
87.50
201782
07/12/88
27.38
LEE A DAN ROSS
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
27.38
201783
07/12/88
165.36
EDINA FOUNDATION
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
I.
L-
-------
- - - - --
165.36
•
201784
07/12/88
120.00
LOIS MEYERS
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
•
120.00
201785
07/12/88
230.73
MOLLIE PAULSON
SALES
OTHER
23 -3625- 000 -00
•
07- 18 -8 *GE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A MESSAGE
23 -4120- 613 -61
25- 4946- 520 -52
10 -4260- 510 -51
10-4260-510-51
10 -4288- 510 -51
10 -4288- 510 -51
10- 4504 - 180 -18
10- 4600 - 180 -18
25- 4944 - 180 -18
201790 07/12/88 9.62 DEPENDABLE COURIER DEDICATED FUND CABLE 10 -2146- 000 -00 112269
9.62
�Y
201791 07/12/88 105.00 HENN COUNTY TREAS RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 644 -64 13355
1988
OF EDINA
105.00 •
CHECK
STER
LAUNDRY
CHECK
NO. DATE
AMOUNT
VENDOR
ITEM DESCRIPTION
'
201785
07/12/88
146.76
MOLLIE PAULSON
SALARY TEMP EMP
325.95-
RED
WING
377.49
--
10 -4262- 646 -64
201786
07/12/88
55,860.00
CO FIELD CO
AIR COND
LAUNDRY
201793
07/12/88
55,860.00
+
MILEAGE
-WING
201787
07/12/88
2,744.20
FRANK B HALL 6 CO
INSURANCE
�,
201787
07/12/88
10,453.00
FRANK B HALL 6 CO
INSURANCE
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
13,197.20
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
201794
07/12/88
240.00
JACOBSON SUPPLY
CHEMICALS
WING
201788
07/12/88
11158.00
BMS OFF STORES
SERV CONTRACT EO
325.95-
201788
07/12/88
1,084.00
BMS OFF STORES
CONTRACTED SERV EO
^i 201795
07/12/88
325.95
2,242.00
•
SHOES
LAUNDRY
201789
07/12/88
28.00
BUS RECORDS CORP
GEN SUPPLIES
WING
201789
07/12/88
64.00
BUS RECORDS CORP
PRINTING
325.95
201789
07/12/88
140.00
BUS RECORDS CORP
DEMO BOX
232.00
07- 18 -8 *GE 14
ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. A MESSAGE
23 -4120- 613 -61
25- 4946- 520 -52
10 -4260- 510 -51
10-4260-510-51
10 -4288- 510 -51
10 -4288- 510 -51
10- 4504 - 180 -18
10- 4600 - 180 -18
25- 4944 - 180 -18
201790 07/12/88 9.62 DEPENDABLE COURIER DEDICATED FUND CABLE 10 -2146- 000 -00 112269
9.62
�Y
201791 07/12/88 105.00 HENN COUNTY TREAS RUBBISH REMOVAL 10 -4250- 644 -64 13355
30- 4248 - 781 -78 880623
30- 4208 - 781 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78 - -
30- 4624 - 783 -78
30- 4564 - 783 -78 88078
30- 4564- 783 -78 88074
201795
07/12/88
694.06
105.00 •
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
201795
_
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
201792
07/12/88
50.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERV
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
325.95-
RED
WING
50.00 y - -
--
10 -4262- 646 -64
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
201793
07/12/88
63.52
ADVON
MILEAGE
-WING
201793
07/12/88
63.52=
- ADVON- -- -- .-- -. -
"- MILEAGE --
�,
201793
07/12/88
153.10
ADVON
COST OF GOODS
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
153.10
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
201794
07/12/88
240.00
JACOBSON SUPPLY
CHEMICALS
WING
201794
07/12/88
53.50-
JACOBSON SUPPLY
CHEMICALS
325.95-
RED
- - --
186.50 M
- - - -- - - - -
-- -- -- - - -- - - - - --
30- 4248 - 781 -78 880623
30- 4208 - 781 -78
30- 4208 - 781 -78 - -
30- 4624 - 783 -78
30- 4564 - 783 -78 88078
30- 4564- 783 -78 88074
201795
07/12/88
694.06
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 301 -30
201795
_
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
__201795
201795
07/12/88
325.95
-RED-
-WING
SHOES
-- " - -" - LAUNDRY - --
10- 4262 - 646 -64 - - - --
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
201795
07/12/88
_
325.9S-
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY - - -
-._ - 10- 4262 - 646 -64
201795
07/12/88
325.95-
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10-4262- 646 -64
^i 201795
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10- 4262 - 646 -64
' 201795
07/12%88
325:95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY'
- -10 -4262- 646 -64 - - " --
201795
07/12/88
325.95
RED
WING
SHOES
LAUNDRY
10 -4262- 646 -64
1.020.01 •
201796 07/12/88 19.00 THOMAS MACDONALD REGISTRATION FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00
19.00 •
201797 07/12/88 236.25 EUGENE DAVIS PROF SERVICES 10 -4201- 600 -60
1
1
/
1
L
1
�r
b98S CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -18 -88 PAGE 15
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. N MESSAGE
201797 07/12/88 34.20 EUGENE DAVIS MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60
201798
201799
201800
_ 201801
I"-
s
270.45
s
74.50
07/12/88
112.00
RADIO INSTALLS
EQUIP RENTAL
10 -4226- 440 -44 11606
112.00
s
07/12/88
60.00
AICPA
DUES
10 -4204- 160-16
60.00
sss -CKS
=
07/12/88
85.75
CUSTOM FIRE APP
EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 440 -44 2185
SALARY TEMP EMP
85.75
s
07/12/88
19.00
LOUISE BAILEY
REGISTRATION FEES
10- 3500 - 000 -00
19.00
s
- 145:19
s
201802
07/12/88
74.50
MN CONWAY FIRE 6 SAF
6EQUIP MAINT
10 -4274- 440 -44
74.50
s
ssssss
sss -CKS
=
201804
07/12/88
184.80
JUDY SUBLETT
SALARY TEMP EMP
23- 4120 - 611 -61-
184.80
s
201805 -
-- 07/12/88 - - - --
- 145:19
MIDWEST -CHEM SUPPLY --
-GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504 - 520 -52 21985 -
145.19
•
201806
07/12%88 -
360.00________
BILLIE D MOIR
HOSPITALIZATION
10- 4156- 510 -51 --
360.00
•
201807
07/f2/88 -
360:06
RICHARD NISSEN - -" ^ " "
-- HOSPITALIZATION -- —
10- 4156 - 510 -51 - -- - -- -
4,
360.00
s
201808
07/12/88
314.00
JERRY DREVLOW
HOSPITALIZATION
10 -4156- 510 -51
v
314.00
s
201809
— 07/12/88
360:00
ROBERT- GRUNDSTROM - - - --
HOSPITALIZATION " - - - --
10- 4156- 510- 51- - - - - -- -
360.00
s
201810
07/12/88
360.00-
- - --
-_PAUL BUELL - - --
HOSPITALIZATION
10- 4156- 510 -51
360.00
•
201817
— 07/12788 --
240.00
- -KRIS EIDEM --
HOSPITALIZATION
10- 4156 - 510 -51
240.00
s
201812
07/12/88
92.50
TODD ANDERSON
PROF SERVICES
10 -4201- 630 -62
^I
92.50
s
201813
07/72/88
172:52-
KUSTOM- ELECTRONICS- '- -
- - "- LEASE PMT- - - - -
-- 10- 4901- 420 -42- - -- - -- -- -- - - -
-i
172.52
s
"
201814
07/12/88
296.40
MOTOROLA
EQUIP MAINT
10- 4274 - 420 -42 M02134
296.40
s
201815
07772/88 --
42:00
INTL "ASSC- CHIEF POL - -
-- DUES 6 SUBSCRIPTIONS --
10- 4204 - 420 -42 - -- -- - - - - -
-
42.00
s
s
I
1988 . OF EDINA CHECK .$TER 07 -18 -8. AGE 16
r
CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE
r
A
f
f
201816
07/12/88
90.00
COMM -OF -IRAN - " —
BUR OF CRIMINAL APP
TELETYPE SERVICE
10- 4268- 420 -42 880213
201824
07/12/88
25.00
90.00
r
10- 4504- 260 -26 65550
85.00 •
201826
07/12/88
16,057.85
201817
07/12/88
362.78
DAVES FOOD WAGON
COST OF GOODS SOLD
27-4624 - 663 -66
362.78
r
07/12/88
11,487.50
H 6 H WATERTOWER
V
60-2040- 000 -00
11,487.50 r
201818
07/12/88
8,845.00
EAGAN CONSTR
CONSTR IN PROGRESS
28 -1300- 000 -00
8,845.00
r
GENERAL FUND
1,872.70
FUND 23 TOTAL - -
ART CENTER - - -
-- - - - - -- — -- -
%w
201819
07/12/88
300.00
BOB BACH CONSTR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
27- 4504 - 662 -66
1,793.01
FUND 26 TOTAL
-
- -- 300.00
•
_
14,259.19
�-
201820
07/12/88
47.00
HERB DECKER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
27- 4248 - 662 -66
RECREATION CENTER FUND
47.00
74.20
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
..
—
- 5,533.07
FUND 30 -TOTAL -
- EDINBOROUGH PARK-
201821
07/12/88
164.00
FUND 40 TOTAL
DC ANNIS SEWER
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
40- 4248 - 812 -80 6976
137,996.25
- -
164.00
*
- -- -- - --
33,202.44
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
=
201822
— E018£2
07/12/88
- •- --
- Of+i s ine —
365.58
-- -- _6S-S8
-
BUR OF BUS PRACTICE
-
TRAINING AIDS
TRAINING
10- 4608- 2S1 -28
-
`,'
r e
.00
r
BUR-OF BUS PRACTICE
365.58
AIDS
T9- 464s -cS4 eS-
201823
07712788
- 5,098.60
-
AEC - -- —
PROF SERVICES -
40 -4201- 800 -80 -_ - -
%„
51098.60
•
201824
07/12/88
949.50
BARR ENG
PROF SERVICES--
10 -4201- 260 -26
ti+ '
949.50
r
r
A
f
f
201825-
07/12/88
60:00
COMM -OF -IRAN - " —
- GEN SUPPLIES --
10- 4504 - 260 -26 65191 --
%w
201824
07/12/88
25.00
COMM OF TRAN
GEN SUPPLIES
10- 4504- 260 -26 65550
85.00 •
201826
07/12/88
16,057.85
PROG CONTRACTORS
CONTRACTS PAYABLE
60 -2040- 000 -00
16,057.85 r
201827
07/12/88
11,487.50
H 6 H WATERTOWER
CONTRACTS PAYABLE
60-2040- 000 -00
11,487.50 r
rrrrr•
rrr -CKS
70,366.21
FUND 10 TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
1,872.70
FUND 23 TOTAL - -
ART CENTER - - -
-- - - - - -- — -- -
%w
57,372.89
FUND 25 TOTAL
CAPITAL FUND
1,793.01
FUND 26 TOTAL
SWIMMING POOL FUND
_
14,259.19
FUND 27 TOTAL
GOLF COURSE FUND
- - -
V`I
41,803.49
FUND 2S TOTAL
RECREATION CENTER FUND
74.20
FUND 29 TOTAL
GUN RANGE FUND
..
—
- 5,533.07
FUND 30 -TOTAL -
- EDINBOROUGH PARK-
24,821.3S
FUND 40 TOTAL
UTILITY FUND
137,996.25
FUND 50 TOTAL
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
33,202.44
FUND 60 TOTAL
CONSTRUCTION FUND
389,094.80
TOTAL
r
A
f
f