Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1988-08-15_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 15, 1988 ROLLCALL UNITED WAY PROCLAMATION CENTENNIAL FLOWER GARDEN CONTEST AWARDS I. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS.. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) and in bold print are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Council Member or citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. * II. APPROVAL OF M DMWS of the Regular Meetings of March 7 and August 1, 1988. III. PUBLIC HEARING - STORM DRAINAGE UTILITY IV. PUBLIC - HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote to pass if improvement has been petitioned for; 4 /5- favorable -vote required if no petition. A. Traffic Control Signal System No. P -88 -8 S.A.P. 120- 166 -01 Hazelton Road at Byerly's Driveway /Leisure Lane V. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS. Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinance: First and Second Reading requires 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. A. Preliminary Plat ADDroval 1. Oak Ponds of.'Interlachen 2nd Addition - Michael Halley Homes - Generally located west of Blake Road and west of Fox Meadow Lane extended 2. Hed Addition - Virgil and Sharon Hed, 6625 West Trail, Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills B. Conditional Use Permit - Edina Community Lutheran Church - Generally located south of 54th Street and west of Halifax Av C. Final Development Plan - Southdale Center Expansion - The Center Companies and The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States VI. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VII. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Street Surfacing with Concrete Curb and Gutter - Contract #88 -5 - Improvement No. BA -282 * B. (1) Used Hydraulic Articulated Motor Grader (Continue to 9/12/88) Edina City Council Agenda August 15, 1988 Page.Two VIII. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Approval of Traffic Safety Committee Minutes of August 9, 1988 B. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board Nomination C. 1988 NLC Congress of Cities - December 3 -7 - Boston, Massachusetts * D. Set Hearing Date - Special Assessments (9/19/88) * E. Sever/Water Rates (Continue to 9/12/88) IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Petition for Street Vacation - Willson Drive - Set Hearing Date (9/12/88) X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. POST AGENDA AND MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS XII. FINANCE A. 1989 Budget Assumptions B. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 8/15/88: General Fund $71,891.78, Art Center $1,240.62, Capital Fund $1,281.05, Swimming Pool Fund $3,354.28, Golf Course Fund $9,811.01, Recreation Center Fund $27.20, Gun Range Fund $377.22, Edinborough Park $5,485.93, Utility Fund $16,708.30, Liquor Dispensary Fund $929.24, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $491.75, Total $111,598.38; payment of Claims as per pre -list dated-8/15/88: General Fund $136,224.12, Art Center $8,125.71, Captial Find $19,015.00, Swimming Pool Fund $1,545.80, Golf Course Fund $10,779.97, Recreation Center Fund $111,699.18, Edinborough Park $4,117.37, Utility $29,774.61, Liquor Dispensary Fund $93,752.80, Construction Fund $31,202.83, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,800.00, Total $448,037.39; and for confirmation of 'payment of Claims dated 7/31/88: General Fund $408.953.26, Art Center $1,219.87, Swimming Pool Fund $5,363.16, Golf Course Fund $12,884.63, Recreation Center Fund $4,538.87, Gun Range Fund $293.93, Edinborough Park $10,373.98, Utility Fund $48,380.41, Liquor Dispensary Fund $144,021.00, IMP Bond Redemption #2 $315,125.00, Total $951,154.11 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS EVENTS Tues Sept 6 First Budget Hearing Thur Sept 8 Budget Hearing Mon Sept 12 Regular Council Meeting Thur Sept 15 Budget Hearing Mon Sept 19 Regular Council Meeting 4:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room 4:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room 4:30 p.m. Mgrs Conf Room 7:00 p.m. Council Room. Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. RESOLUTION ADOPTED TO SUBMIT APPLICATION FOR ALL AMERICA CITY DESIGNATION Mayor Courtney introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of.Edina, Minnesota is extremely proud to co- sponsor our community's application to be awarded designation as an All- America City by the National Civic League; and WHEREAS, in its first`100 years, Edina has developed into a community,which.we believe exemplifies exactly those qualities which are characterized by cities which have earned the All- America City Award; and WHEREAS, the - people who live and work here have long established.a pattern of involvement, cooperation and commitment to our community; and WHEREAS, we believe our "civic infrastructure" is strong and'vital, and we are very proud of how Edina "works "; and WHEREAS, we think our story of citizen involvement is extraordinary; BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota looks forward to favorable evaluation of its application and firmly believes that Edina is worthy of receiving the All- America City Award. ADOPTED this 7th day of March, 1988. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried: CENTENNIAL UPDATE was given by Betty Hemstad. She reported that the Ice Castle was a wonderful success. It was begun on January 7 and completed on February 10 and it had 3,222 ice blocks at approximately 125 lbs. each for a total of 200 tons of ice that was lifted from the lake. The Castle's dimensions were 46' square, 25' high to the top of the peak and 36' to the top of the flags. Eighty -one volunteers worked 2,344 hours to complete it: Major February events were a bridge tournament, Judith Guest, speaker at the Edina Community Library and the Winter Festival Weekend on February 13. Approximately,3,000 Edinans with ages ranging from a few months to 90 were involved. The Festival included snow sculptures, a medallion hunt, family skating event, bandy games, sleigh rides with Mrs. Cardarelle, pony rides, outdoor camping, and a bonfire. The Alumni Hockey Event drew 200 players and 400 spectators and was considered a huge success. The MN State Open Chess Championship was held in February as was the Literary Contest with 1,000 entries: The Cake Contest was also a popular event. Kay Bach reported on upcoming events for March. Showcase Edina, with a true variety show flavor will be held on March 18 and 20. Master of Ceremonies will be Manager Ken Rosland. The first raffle drawing will be at the March 18 performance. On" Sunday, March 20, the winners of the Literary Contest will be announced. Portions of the event will be taped for showing on cable. At the end of March there will be a photo - display at the Edina Library called the "Go- Betweens /Lives of Immigrant Children ", a travelling display from the U of M. A successful Centennial Safety Fair was held at Southdale this past weekend. The flower garden contest is being planned at this time, and the seedlings are planted and doing well. " CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made.by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith to approve and adopt the consent items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 1988 APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 22, 1988 as submitted. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *LOT DIVISION RESOLUTION FOR LOT 3. BLOCK 1. SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION.- (7017 AND 7019 MCCAULEY TRAIL). Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the .following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 3, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION;.and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel 1 That part of Lot 3, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying northerly of a line hereinafter described as Line A, Description. of Line A: beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 3, distant 55.93 feet south from the northeast corner of said.Lot 3, thence westerly to a point on the vest line of said Lot 3 distant -56.41 feet south from the northwest corner of said Lot 3, and there terminating. and Parcel 2 That part of Lot 3, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL.FOURTH ADDITION,`.according to the' -- recorded plat therof � °lying southerly of'"said Line- A;'' WHEREAS, it has been determined that co liance.with the.Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City -of Edina will create an uymecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinance Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved•by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance hereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council As may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *HEARING DATE OF MARCH 21, 1988 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith setting March 21, 1988 as hearing date for the following planning matters:. 1). Preliminary Plat Approval - Interlachen Bluff - Andron, Inc. - Generally located south of Interlachen Boulevard and east of Interlachen Circle 2) Conditional Use Permit - Building Expansion - Calvin Christian School, 4015 Inglewood Avenue South Motion carried on rollcall.vote, five ayes ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A22 - (LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED. Planner Craig Larsen said in response to the Council directive, staff had reviewed the landscaping and screening requirement of the Zoning Ordinance and had also looked at ordinances of neighboring communities. Currently,, the Zoning Ordinance requires one overstory tree for each 40' of site perimeter. Overstory trees are defined as deciduous trees with trunk measurement of 2 1/2 inches or greater or coniferous trees 6' in height or greater. A different approach was developed after talking to other communities which is reflected in the proposed amendment. Planner Larsen explained that it does not change the way calculations are done on the absolute numbers of trees that are required for any particular project. Calculations to determine minimum number of trees are always rounded up. The proposed amendment does not change the absolute numbers but changes the mixes of trees and requires a larger variety of trees. It also recognizes the differences in building height. For buildings less than 24' in height, 35% of the trees would be larger than the current minimum size. For buildings 24' tall or greater, 65% of the trees would be larger than the current minimum size. The list of trees includes ornamental, complimentary, accent, primary and full trees as the largest typically installed. They range from 2" in diameter at the base to 5 1/2" or greater,-5' or less on the ornamental trees to 12' or greater for full trees. Planner Larsen presented a comparison of the existing standard, the proposed amendment and the actual in several recent redevelopments and developments (i.e. the Wave car wash on Normandale Road, Vernon Terrace West of Hwy 100, Dewey Hill Business Center near Cahill and Bush Lake Road and Vernon Oaks, a 135 unit apartment building developed on the north side of Vernon Avenue where landscaping became very much of an issue. Planner Larsen advised that at its meeting of January 27, 1988, the Community Development and Planning Commission had recommended adoption of the amendment. Member Smith moved adoption of Ordinance No. 825 -A22 as follows, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A22 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 825) TO INCREASE THE MINIMUM SIZE OF REQUIRED OVERSTORY TREES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraphs (i) and (ii) of Section 10(a), paragraph 3.(c) of Ordinance No. 825 are deleted and are replaced with the following new Subparagraph (i), and Subparagraph (iii) is re- numbered as (ii): "(i) Minimum Amount of Required Trees Tree Size Building Height - Front Tree Title Deciduous or Coniferous Less than 24' 24' or Greater Ornamental 2" or less 5' or less 5% 5% Complimentary 2 1/2" or greater 6' or greater 60% 30% Accent 3 1/2" or greater 8' or greater 20% 25% Primary 4 1/2" or greater 10' or greater 10% 20% Full 5 1/2" or greater 12' or greater 5% 20% Calculations to determine minimum number of trees are always rounded up. Tree size, as to deciduous, is.the diameter of the tree measured 6" above the. ground. Tree size, as to coniferous, is measured in height. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall;be =nfu11 force and effect upon its .passage and publication. ATTEST: Mayor. City Clerk Member Turner.questioned whether the public's reaction need be heard and whether the Planning Commission's input is adequate in terms of.reaction from developers. Member Smith commented that the Ordinance would be published. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Kelly. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith,.Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR TWO DUMP TRUCKS. Notion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Pro Trucks, Inc., for two dump trucks at $34,977.00 each. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 3 1/2 TON PICKUPS. Notion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to recommended sole bidder, Thane Hawkins Chevrolet, for 3 1/2 ton pick -up trucks at $10,587.00 each. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five.ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ASPHALT PAVER. Notion was made by Member Kelly`and.seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to recommended low bidder, Aspen Equipment Company, for one (1) asphalt paver in the amount of $15,736.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED'FOR GREENSMOWER. Notion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to recommended low.bidder, Lakeshore Equipment, for one (1) greensmower from in the amount of $9,345:00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR MEDIA REPLACEMENT IN IRON REMOVAL PLANT #3. Notion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith for award of bid to low bidder, Flo - Covery Systems, Inc., for media replacement in iron removal plant #3, in the amount of $12,472.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. I -494 JOINT COOPERATIVE POWERS AGREEMENT DISCUSSED Member Turner stated that the comments of Member Smith at the previous Council meeting regarding the proposed I -494 Joint Powers Agreement were conveyed to the I -494 Project Management Team and this agreement was revised. She asked if the re -write addressed concerns of Member Smith and said that the I -494 Project Management team would be meeting March 9, 1988 to discuss the I -494 EIS and the status of the Cooperative Agreement with the intent that it would be submitted to the other cities. Following discussion'it was concluded that the concerns had been addressed. No action was taken. REPORT GIVEN ON CITY MANAGER'S REVIEW Mayor Courtney reported.on the City Manager's review conducted recently. He said that.the consensus was that the Council was very pleased with the past year's performance of the City Manager. Further, if anyone was interested in seeing the review, it could be available in the Mayor's office Tuesday morning. Member Turner suggested that the Personnel Committee work with Mr. Rosland, in terms of putting in writing the 1988 Manager's objectives for the Council. Member Kelly inquired about an appropriate time in for doing this. Manager Rosland offered to meet with the Council when schedules permit. No action was taken. *FEASIBILITY REPORTS APPROVED FOR.PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NOS. P -BA -280. P -S -40 P -S -41. P -S -43 AND P -S -44: PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR 3/21/88. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following resolutions: RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON PERMANENT STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -280 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary report as to the feasibility of the proposed Permanent Street Improvement described in the form of Notice of Hearing set forth below, and as to the estimated cost of such improvement, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 21, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said improvement. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice of the time, place and purpose of said meeting to be published in the official newspaper once a week for two successive weeks, the second of which publication is to be not less than three days from the date of said meeting, and t6 mail notice to all affected properties in substantially the following form: (OFFICIAL. PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FRANCE AVENUE - W. 70TH STREET TO ZII NNE SOTA DRIVE PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -280 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, March 21, 1988 at 7:00 p.m., to consider the following proposed improvement to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. The approximate cost of said improvement is estimated by Hennepin County and the City as set forth below: FRANCE AVENUE - West 70th Street to Minnesota Drive ESTIMATED COST PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. P -BA -280 $2,300,000.00 The area proposed to be assessed for a portion of the cost of proposed improvement includes: Tract A, B.L.S. 677; Lot 1, Blk 1, Stow's Edgemoor; Lot 1 & 2, Blk 1, Stow's Edgemoor Add'n, Blk 9 Replat; Lot 1, Blk 8, Stov's Edgemoor; Lot 44, Blk 1, Oscar Roberts 1st Add'n; Lots 2 & 3, Blk 3, Oscar Roberts 1st Add'n; Lot 3, Blk 1, Hedberg Parklawn 1st Add'n; Tract E b F,.R.L.S. 1129; Lots 1 b 2, Blk 1 Edina Office Center; Lot 2, Blk 1, Edina Office Center 2nd Add'n; Lots 1 & 2, Blk 1, Yorktown Add'n; Lot 5, Blk 1, Yorktown Add'n; Lots 2 b 3, Blk 7, Yorktown Add'n; Parcel 800, N 1/2 Section 32, Township 28, Range 24; Parcel 4800, S 1/2, Section 32, Township 28, Range 24; The N 325' of the E. 520' of SE 1/4 of NE 1/4 S.31, T.28, R.24 Ex. Rd. The W 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of S.32, T. 28, R.24 Ex. Rds. These properties are proposed to be assessed at $40.00 per lineal foot of property abutting France Avenue. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT NOS. P -S -40, P -S -41, P -S -43, P -S -44 1. The City Engineer, having submitted to the Council a preliminary the feasibility of the following described public improvements: SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -40 Vernon Av from Ayrshire Blvd to northerly 330' SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -41 Tracy Av from north end of Crosstown Highway Bridge to Valley View Road SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -43 Gleason Rd from Dewey Hill Rd to Schey Dr SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO. P -S -44 Gleason Rd from Schey Dr to Valley View Rd report as to and as to the estimated cost of such improvements, said report is hereby approved and directed to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. This Council shall meet on Monday, March 21, 1988, at 7:00 p.m. in the Edina City Hall, to consider in public hearing the views of all persons interested in said impro -*ements. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *STORM SEWER EXTENSION PETITION - NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS. 4401 WEST 76TH STREET REFERRED TO ENGINEERING FOR PROCESSING Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith to refer the petition of National Computer Systems, 4401 West 76th Street, for Storm Sever Extension to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried by rollcall vote, five ayes. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL Member Smith stated that a letter received from Manager Ken Rosland, evaluating the City staff indicated that he felt that the Police Department had done an outstanding job. The way this was stated was that they were "Superior to None ", instead of saying they were "Second to None "; and yet, they had done an outstanding job. He said he felt because of that the Ken Rosland "Superior to None" Award should be instituted. Member Smith said he would cover the cost of the engraving on the plaque. Member Smith stated that he will not be at the April 4, 1988 meeting. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Manager Rosland thanked the City Council for their kind words regarding his performance and pledged that he will work hard in all areas. He said he has asked staff to research and would authorize an expenditure of approximately two - hundred dollars, for purchase of a gift of appreciation to Betty Hemstad and Kay Bach, from the Council, for their commitment and efforts on the Centennial Committee. COUNCIL REMINDED OF THE UPCOMING VISIT OF SWEDEN'S ROYALTY. Manager Rosland reminded the Council that King Carl Gustaf and Queen Silvia of Sweden:_will pay a visit to Edina on April 24, 1988 and that a reception is planned for them at Edinborough Park. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Smith to approve payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 3/7/88: General Fund $172,287.98, Art Center $7,687:12, Capital Fund $5,643.92, Swimming Pool Fund .$723.24, Golf Course Fund $2,128.62, Recreation Center Fund $11,185.59, Edinborough Park $7,924.98, Utility Fund $229,421.00, Liquor Dispensary Fund $3,008.76, Construction Fund $7,806.48, Total $447,817.69. Motion carried on.rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith for adjournment. Motion carried. Acting City Clerk \I 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 1, 1988 Answering rollcall.were Members Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner and Mayor Courtney. RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE FOR WARREN C HYDE ADOPTED. Notion of Member Turner was seconded by Member Richards for adoption of the following_ resolution: RESOLUTION OF CONDOLENCE WHEREAS, on the 20th day of July 1988, death brought to a close the active and productive life of Warren C. Hyde; and WHEREAS, he served as City Manager of the City of Edina, Minnesota, beginning in 1954 until his retirement in 1977; and WHEREAS, he managed the City,as it grew from a rural village of approximately 16,000 to a first class metropolitan suburb of more than 46,000 residents who have recognized and appreciated the quality of life he strove to achieve for the City; and WHEREAS, he was instrumental in acquiring.the land for Lake Cornelia Park, in the development of Braemar Golf Course, the municipal pool and the many other parks within Edina's boundaries; and WHEREAS, he was named one of the top ten managers in the nation by the International City Management Association; was honored by the League of Minnesota Cities as an outstanding municipal official and was greatly respected by his peers for his management skills; WHEREAS, he was videly involved in community, state and national issues of critical interest to municipal government; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council of the City of Edina, - Minnesota, does hereby mourn the passing of WARREN C. HYDE and extends its condolences to his wife, Janet, his sons Michael and Robert, his daughter Laurel, stepdaughters Jill, Karen and Kristen and his grandchildren; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be entered in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that a copy be presented to his family. ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 1988. Resolution adopted unanimously. STEVEN GRAUSAM COMMENDED. Manager Rosland introduced Steven Grausam and advised that he is a relatively new employee at the York Avenue liquor store having started with the City in July, 1987. His job performance has been outstanding.and his knowledge of the business has grown every day. He is an assistant store manager and has been recommended for store manager.in the future. Manager Rosland commended him for excellent work and presented him with a silver pen bearing the Edina Logo in appreciation. The Council also added their thanks and commendation. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by . Member Turner to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly; Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 18, 1988 APPROVED. Notion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 18, 1988. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A26 (MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT) ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED. Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Craig Larsen recalled that on October 12, 1987 the Council gave preliminary approval for the overall development plan for the Hedberg project. A condition of that approval was that an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance be developed that would address the procedures and also the unique nature of the project. He advised that an amendment has been drafted which.addresses both the procedure for rezoning and the developmental constraints for Mixed Development Districts. The draft amendment to the procedure section would replace the current two- step- review process with a three -step process for multi -phase projects. Single phase projects would continue to be subject to a two -step process. Step one, Preliminary Development Plan, would remain as currently stated for most developments. It would include land use, density, parking, etc. Step two, Overall Development Plan, would provide location and height of building, landscaping concept, and a preliminary plan for all public improvements. Overall Development Plan approval would constitute final rezoning of the tract. Step three, Final Site Plan Approval, would be a review of final design development details for each phase of the development. Planner Larsen explained that, in a large multi -year project such as Hedberg that is projected to take from 5 to 10 years to develop, a third step has been added to the process. For the first two steps in a large project such as Hedberg, the specifics as.to actual building materials, shape, footprint and location of all parking would not be determined in the Overall Development Plan but would be determined in the Final Site Plan Approval. In the development standards section, Section 14, a new district, MD -6 has been added. This district would require a minimum tract of 50 acres which would be expected to be a multi -phase project. This compares to a 5 acre minimum for the MD -5 District. Districts MD -3, MD -4, and MD -5 were designed originally.to favor and promote the construction of housing and to give non - residential use as a reward for that housing. The MD -6 District creates more of a balance between residential and non- residential uses and recognizes the unique nature of the project. Commercial and retail uses are a much more integral element in the MD -6 District compared to its accessory use status in the other districts and would become.a free standing prin`c'ipal use in the MD -6 District. This would be consistent toIthe Hedberg _.,.,.,,.Project, plans that have been presented.. Planner Larsen added that the amendment has been modified to reflect the recommendations of the Community Development and Commission on setback and traffic studies. The traffic study would be required at Preliminary Plan Approval, step one of the process. Parcels 50 acres in size or greater should be subjected to -a traffic impact analysis and plan as the phases proceed to be developed. The Commission recommended that the setbacks in Section F.3 remain as originally stated. The °only new requirements would be those for the MD -6 District. If the Council approves the draft amendment, staff would recommend adoption with waiver of Second Reading so that the amendment would be in place before final rezoning for the Hedberg Project. Member Turner asked for a clarification of when the traffic impact analysis would be required. Planner Larsen responded that it will be included in step one. Member Turner questioned if, in a future MD -6 District proposal, there would be adequate grounds for the Council to limit the proportion of commercial use versus housing. Planner Larsen said the intent of the ordinance would be to allow the Council the flexibility to review the plan and to say that the proportions, in their opinion, are wrong. No further comment being heard, Member Turner moved adoption of the following ordinance, with waiver of Second Reading: ORDINANCE NO. 825 -A26 (Ordinance to be inserted after City Attorney has approved final format) Motion for adoption of the.ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 2. BLOCK 6. BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION (7704 -7706 TANGLEWOOD COURT). Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner to adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION AREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 2, Block 6, BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION; and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: Parcel 1: That part of Lot 2, Block 6, BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION lying northeasterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot; thence South 23 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds West, assumed bearing, a distance of 45.94 feet along the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 66.degrees 53 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 172.61 feet to the Westerly line of said Lot. Parcel 2: That part of Lot 2, Block 6, BRAEMAR HILLS 9TH ADDITION lying southwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot; thence South 23 degrees 10 minutes 37 seconds West, assumed bearing, a distance of 45.94 feet along the Southeasterly line of said Lot to the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 66 degrees 53 minutes 28 seconds West a distance of 172.61 feet to the Westerly line of said Lot. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made�of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote,_ five ayes. *LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOTS 10 AND 11. BLOCK 1. INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION (6315 AND 6319 TIMBER TRAIL). Notion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 10, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION and Lot 11, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new.and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): That part of Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION, lying Southerly of a line drawn from a point on the West line of said Lot 11, distant 32.0 feet South of the Northwest corner .thereof to a.point on the East line of Lot 10, distant 7.65 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof and That part of Lots 10 and 11, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS 3RD ADDITION,. lying Northerly of a line drawn from a point on the West line of said -Lot 11, distant 32.0 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof to a point on the East line of Lot 10, distant 7.65 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance -with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 801 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 801 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *HEARING DATES SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS. Notion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner setting August 15, 1988 as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1) .Preliminary Plat Approval - Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition - Generally located vest of Blake Road and west of Fos Meadow Lane extended 2) Preliminary Plat Approval -fled Addition - Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills 3) Conditional Use Permit — Edina Community Lutheran Church - Generally located south of 54th Street and west of Halifax Avenue 4) Final Development Plan - Southdale Center Expansion and setting September 12, 1988 as hearing date for: 1) Preliminary Plat Approval - Berenberg First Addition, Part of Lot 1,.Block 1, Hilldale - Generally located north of Interlachen Boulevard and west of Oxford Av. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. ORDINANCE N0. 410 (ADOPTING MSBC AND UBC)' ADOPTED: SECOND READING WAIVED. Manager Rosland advised that Ordinance No. 410 would adopt the Minnesota. State Building Code (MSBC) which was in effect in February 1987 and, as a part of that adoption, the 1985 Uniform Building Code (UBC). The state building code is mandatory for the City with certain optional features. Therefore, staff has been enforcing it in its present form since 1987. While reviewing the current ordinance to determine whether the City had adopted the optional feature of the MSBC relating to covered malls in regard to the Southdale proposed expansion, it was concluded that we had not, but should formally adopt by ordinance the MSBC and with it the 1985 UBC and also two optional- features, namely Chapter 7 (Covered Mall Buildings) and Chapter 55 (Membrane Structures). Attorney Erickson has advised that this is best done by a new ordinance resulting in the repeal of the existing Ordinance No. 406 (the ordinance adopting the previous MSBC) and Ordinance No. 408 (establishing a fee for building inspections; that fee is now in the 1985 UBC). Due to the repealing of Ordinances Nos. 406 and 408, it is appropriate to include in the new Ordinance No. 410 those provisions of Ordinance No. 406 which should be carried. forward, including the requirement for completion of exteriors of buildings within 12 months which was given first reading by the Council on July 18, 1988. Member Smith reiterated his concern that sometimes situations occur which would make completion of the exterior impossible to complete within 12 months and that he hoped the Building Department would enforce the ordinance.as appropriate. There being no further comment, Member Turner moved adoption of Ordinance No. 410 with waiver of Second Reading as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 410 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE BY REFERENCE; PROVIDING FOR. ITS ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT; PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND COLLECTING OF FEES THEREFOR; REQUIRING COMPLETION OF EXTERIORS OF BUILDINGS;.PROVIDING A PENALTY; AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 406 AND 408 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA,"NINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Minnesota State Building Code Adopted. There is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference, as an ordinance of the City, the Minnesota State Building Code (the "MSBC ") as promulgated by the Department of Administration of the State of Minnesota, as amended, including amendments in effect on February 9, 1987, and effective on February 17, 1987. Provided, however, that no provisions of the MSBC, or documents referred to therein, which are not required by the laws of, the State of Minnesota to be adopted by the City. are adopted except the following, which.are hereby adopted and are incorporated herein by reference: (a) Chapter 7 (Division I. Covered Mall Buildings) of the Appendix of the 1985 Edition of the Uniform Building Code (the "IIBC ") as promulgated by the International Conference of Building Officials; and (b) Chapter 55 (Membrane Structures) of the Appendix of the IIBC. Sec 2. Permits. Inspections and Fees. (a) Permits, inspections, fees and collection of fees shall be as provided_ in Chapter 3 of the IIBC. (b) In addition to the fees charged pursuant to (a) of this section, each applicant for a permit shall pay a surcharge to the City to be remitted to the Minnesota Department of Administration pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16B.70. Sec. 3. Codes on File. One copy of each of the following, each marked "Official Copy," is on file in the office of the City Clerk and shall remain on file for use and examination of the public: (a) the Minnesota State Building Code regulations known and identified as Chapters 1300, 1305, 1310, 1315, 1320, 1330, 1335, 1340, 1355, 1360 and 1365; (b) the IIBC, with appendices; (c) the 1984 National Electrical Code; (d) the 1984 American National Standard Safety Code for Elevators, Dumbwaiters, Escalators, and Moving Walks, identified as ANSI -A17.1 -1984, including supplement ANSI- A17.la -1985; (e) One and Two Family Dwelling Code, 1975 Edition; (f) MSBC Chapter 1345 known as the Heating, Ventilating, Air - Conditioning & Refrigeration Rules, 1345.0010 through 1345.3300; (g) Energy Conservation Alternatives in Construction identified as MSBC Chapter 4215, and the 1983 edition of the Model Energy Code, as published by the Council of American Building Officials, Falls Church, Virginia, adopted by reference by said Chapter 4215; (h) MSBC Chapter 1325 known as "Solar Energy Systems," from Minnesota Rules, 1983, as in effect August 31, 1984; (i) MSBC Chapter 1350, known as the "Manufactured Homes" Rules, 1983 Edition; and (j) MSBC Rules Chapter 1355 known as "Minnesota Plumbing Code, 1987 Edition," as promulgated by the Minnesota Department of Administration and the Minnesota Health Department. The Clerk shall furnish copies of said codes or regulations at cost to any person upon request. Sec. 4. Organization and Enforcement. The organization of the Building Department of the City, and enforcement of this ordinance,.shall be as established by Chapter 2 of the IIBC. Sec. 5 Completion of Exterior. The roof and building exterior of all single and two family structures, including garages and accessory buildings, shall be finished with exterior building materials as required by and in compliance with all applicable building codes and ordinances, within 12 months after the date of issuance of a building permit for the new construction, alteration or relocation of such structures, or within 12 months of the effective date of this section, whichever is later. Sec. 6. Penalty. Any person who violates or fails to comply with any provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties set forth in Ordinance No. 175 and other penalties and remedies available under the Minnesota State Building Code. Sec. 7. Repealer. Ordinance No. 406 and Ordinance No. 408 are hereby repealed in their entirety. Sec. 8. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Smith. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1014 (REGULATING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES) ADOPTED ON SECOND READING. Manager Rosland recalled that this ordinance which would regulate the possession, purchase or delivery of controlled substances had been given First Reading by the Council at the July 18, 1988 meeting. When the ordinance was drafted the intent was to include a repealer section which.inadvertently was omitted. Section 8 has now been included which repeals Ordinance No. 1011 and the ordinance has been given a new number (Ordinance No. 1014). The City's attorneys and staff would recommend adoption as now presented. No comment being heard, Member Kelly moved Second Reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 1014 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1014 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE POSSESSION, PURCHASE OR DELIVERY OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES, AND PROVIDING A PENALTY AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 1014 THE.CITY COUNCIL -FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Definitions. The definitions listed in Minn. Stat. 152.01 are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Ordinance as completely as if set out herein in full. Specifically, the following words and terms, when used in this Ordinance, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1. Drug The term "drug" includes all medicines and preparations - recognized in the United States pharmacopoeia or national formulary and any substance or mixture of substances intended to be used for the cure, mitigation, or prevention of disease of either humans or animals. 2. Administer. "Administer" means to deliver by, or pursuant to the lawful order of a licensed medical doctor a single dose of a controlled substance to a patient or research subject by injection,- inhalation, ingestion, or by any other immediate means. 3. Controlled substance. "Controlled substance" means a drug, substance, or immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of Minn. Stat. 152.02. The term . shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages,.intoxicating liquors, or tobacco. 4. Pharmacist intern. The term "pharmacist intern" means a natural person, a graduate of the college of pharmacy, University of Minnesota, or other pharmacy college, approved by the board, or a person satisfactorily progressing toward the degree in pharmacy required for licensure, registered by the state board of pharmacy, for the purpose of obtaining practical experience as a requirement for licensure as a pharmacist or a qualified applicant, awaiting licensure. 5. Manufacturin¢. "Manufacturing ", in places other than a pharmacy, means and includes the production, quality control, and standardization by mechanical, physical, chemical, or pharmaceutical means, packing, repacking, tableting, encapsulating, labeling,.relabeling, filling, or by other process, of drugs. 6. Dispense. "Dispense" means to deliver one or more doses of a controlled substance in a suitable container, properly labeled, for subsequent administration to, or use by a patient or research subject. 7. Marijuana. "Marijuana" means all parts of the plant of any species of the genus Cannabis, including all agronomical varieties, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of such plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin, but shall not include the mature stalks of such.plant, fiber from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plants, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks, except the resin extracted therefrom, fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination. 8. Narcotic drug. "Narcotic drug" means any of the following, whether produced directly or indirectly by extraction from substances of vegetable origin, or independently by means of chemical synthesis, or by a combination of extraction and chemical synthesis: (1) Opium, coca leaves, and opiates: (2) A compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or preparation of opium,, coca leaves or opiates: (3) A substance, and any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, or preparation thereof, which is chemically identical with any of the substances referred to in clauses (1) and (2), except that the words "narcotic drug" as used in this chapter shall not include decocainized coca leaves or extracts of coca leaves, which extracts do not contain cocaine or ecgonine. 9. iate: "Opiate" means any dangerous substance having an addiction forming or addiction sustaining liability similar to morphine or being capable of conversion into a drug having such addiction forming or addiction sustaining liability. 10. Opium poppy. "Opium poppy" means the plant of the species Papaver somniferum L., except the seeds thereof. 11. Person. "Person" includes every individual, copartnership, corporation or. association of one or more individuals. 12. Poppy straw. "Poppy straw" means all parts, except the seeds, of the opium poppy after mowing. 13. Immediate precursor. "Immediate precursor" means a substance which the state board of pharmacy has found to be and by rule designates as being the principal compound commonly used or produced for use, and which is an immediate chemical intermediary used or likely to be used in the manufacture of a controlled substance, the control of which is necessary to prevent, curtail, or limit such manufacture. 14. Small amount. "Small amount" as applied to marijuana means 42.5 grams or less. This provision shall not apply to the resinous form of marijuana. 15. Appropriate agency. "Appropriate agency" means either the bureau of criminal apprehension, the state board of pharmacy, state patrol, county sheriffs and their deputies, or city policy departments in municipalities containing 2,500 or more inhabitants. 16. Drug paraphernalia. "Drug paraphernalia" means all equipment, products, and materials of any kind, except.those items used in conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances under this chapter or the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, which are knowingly or intentionally used primarily in (1) manufacturing a controlled substance, (2) injecting, ingesting, inhaling, or otherwise introducing into the human body.a controlled substance, (3) testing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of a controlled substance, or (4) enhancing the effect of a controlled substance. Sec. 2. Controlled Substances. The five schedules of controlled substances listed in Minn. Stat. 152.02 are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Ordinance as completely as if set out herein in full.. Sec. 3. Prohibited Acts. (a) It shall be unlawful for any person, firm of corporation to. manufacture, possess, sell, give away, barter, exchange, distribute, or otherwise transfer any controlled substance. (b) The.provisions of Subsection (a):do not apply: (1) to possession by a person for his own use'.and when possession is .authorized by law; (2) to the prescribing, administering,-or dispensing of a controlled substance by a pharmacist, physician, doctor of osteopathy licensed to practice medicine, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or other authorized person in the course of his professional practice; (3) to the sale of a controlled substance in the regular course of business to registered wholesalers and manufacturers of controlled substances, registered pharmacies, licensed hospitals or institutions wherein sick and injured persons are cared for or treated, bonafide animal hospitals, or licensed medical .doctors; (4) to the possession of a controlled substance in the regular course of business by registered wholesalers and manufacturers of controlled substances, registered pharmacies, licensed hospitals wherein sick and injured persons are cared for or treated, bonafide animal hospitals, or licensed medical doctors; (5) to possession of a controlled substance by a person in accordance with the terms of a prescription and prescribed treatment of a licensed medical doctor; (6) to possession of a controlled substance by common carriers or warehousemen lawfully engaged in transporting or storing such substances in the regular course of business; (7) to the possession of a controlled substance by public officers or employees while in the performance of official duties requiring such possession or control. Sec. 4.' Fraud. It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or procure, attempt to sell or procure, or possess or have in his control a controlled substance by: (1) fraud, deceit, misrepresentation, or subterfuge; or (2) the use of a false name or address; or (3) forgery or alteration of a prescription; or (4) giving false credit; or (5) making, issuing, or uttering any false or forged prescription; or (6) falsely assuming the title of, or falsely representing any person to-be, a manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacist, physician, doctor of osteopathy licensed to practice medicine, dentist, podiatrist, veterinarian, or other authorized person for the purpose of obtaining a controlled substance. Sec. 5. Penalty. Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor except as provided in Minn. Stat. 152.15 Subd. 2(5), (6) and (7) and subject to the penalties set forth in Edina City Ordinance No. 175, the provisions of which are hereby incorporated in and made a part of this Ordinance as completely as if set out herein in full. Sec. 6. Confiscation and Disposition of Prohibited Drugs. Any controlled substance found in the possession of any person convicted of a violation of this Ordinance shall be confiscated and shall be forfeited to the Chief of Police, who shall make proper and timely disposition thereof by destroying them. Sec. 7. Use of Original Containers and Labels Required. All patients having possession of any controlled substance, by lawful prescription of a licensed medical doctor while such controlled substances are lawfully in such person's possession, shall keep such controlled substances in the original container in which they were delivered until used in accordance with such prescription, and shall not remove the pharmacist's original label identifying the prescription from such original container. Sec. S. Repealer. Ordinance No. 1011 is hereby repealed in its entirety. Sec. 9._ Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its passage and publication. Motion for adoption of the ordinance was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Richards, Smith, Turner, Courtney Ordinance adopted. BID AWARDED FOR RENOVATION OF BRAEMAR PAVILION - PHASE II A & B. Robert Christianson, Chairman of Edina Park Board, made the presentation on renovation of Braemar Pavilion as follows. Several months ago the Park Board was presented with a plan whereby Braemar Pavilion would be rehabilitated, Braemar Golf Course would be upgraded with an additional nine holes, and the Golf Dome would be acquired by the City. The Park Board spent considerable time on the issue and made some recommendations to the Council.. Subsequently, the Council accepted the first part of the recommendations which was to immediately proceed to replace the ice surface in the pavilion and instructed staff to obtain bids on that portion and also to obtain bids on a second phase of the pavilion rehabilitation which was to change the structure of the building itself, making it much more affirmative in nature and more energy efficient. The balance of the recommendation were.basically put on hold, i.e. the addition of the nine holes and the acquisition of the Golf Dome. Since that time there has been an award of bid for the replacement of the ice surface. The architects presented a bid package for the second phase.and bids were received for the pavilion renovation. A special Park Board meeting was held on July 28, 1988 to discuss the bid for the purpose of making a recommendation to the Council and the minutes of the meeting accurately describe the discussion. The Park Board recommended approval of Phase II A (completion of pavilion with locker rooms /walls) and B (completion of commons) of the Braemar Pavilion project; approval, as an offset to the expense, the Braemar Golf Course project that would include nine holes, looking into the possibility of purchasing the Golf Dome, and looking into the purchase of Normandale Golf Course from Opus. The profits from these golf facilities are to offset the expense generated by the Braemar Pavilion project. It was also recommended that the revenues generated by the existing Braemar Golf Course facility, excluding the new nine hole course, remain within .that facility's budget. Mr. Christianson concluded by saying that the total package is a significant dollar expenditure and is a major undertaking. Bob Kojetin, Director of Parks.-and Recreation, then presented financial data in support of the recommendations and figures to back up revenue in order to renovate the Braemar Arena and Pavilion at a total cost of $1,819,200 and to award the bid of $1,020,000 for Phase II A and B. Phase II consists of locker rooms and permanent walls for the pavilion, and the commons building which would connect the arena and pavilion. He recalled that at the May 2, 1988 meeting the Council awarded a bid for $691,200 for the renovation of the refrigeration equipment in the pavilion. At that meeting the Council had approved proceeding with architectural drawings for the total Braemar Arena - Pavilion Renovation. Architectural fees for the total project are $108,000. Budget projections totaling $1.5 million for the construction of the new nine hole golf course were presented. Revenues showed a net profit of approximately $135,000. Total cost of construction at the Braemar 18 hole course for a new A -frame building, golf cart storage, parking lot improvements and upgrading the old clubhouse roof is. projected at $550,000. With regard to the possibility of purchasing the Edina Golf Dome, Mr. Kojetin said we are still waiting for an independent appraiser's results of cost. Projected revenue and expense for the Golf Dome showed estimated operating income at build out of $43,000. If Normandale Golf Course is acquired, it is recommended that it be operated for a period of years before the course would be renovated. Projections of the revenue that is received at that course in today's market indicate that we would be able to realize approximately $50,000 per year: Recently the irrigation system has been upgraded along with some soil condition renovation. Projected net revenue from the new nine hole golf course is $135,000. Other projected revenues: Edina Hockey Association and Braemar Figure Skating Club have committed to $15.00 per member. Skating lessons would have a $5.00 per skater charge,.similar to the field use charge for other athletic associations. The current Golf Dome lease guarantees $9,000 plus a percentage of gross over $150,000. In the last few years the gross has exceeded $150,000. Mr. Y,cjetin noted that the 1987 Capital Plan has projected $215,000 through the year 1995 for renovation of the pavilion, exclusive of $20,000 for the furnace at the arena and an ice resurfacer in 1990. He proposed spreading this over 20 years at $10,000 per`year. It is also proposed to increase the ice rental from $85 to $90 per hour starting.the fall of 1990. Total revenues were projected at approximately $190,000 per year. Bond .run projections are based on an average of a 20 -year period of $189,500. During the first two years, 1989 and 1990, the bond payments would be $154,615. In conclusion, Mr. Kojetin said that staff feels that we will have projected revenue for the arena and pavilion of $190,000 over a 20 -year period and recommends award of bid to low bidder, Eagan Construction Company, Inc., at $1,020,000 for construction of Braemar Arena Renovation Phase II A and B. Staff concurs with the second recommendation of the Park Board that the budgets of the nine hole course and the 18 hole complex be separate and that the net profit of the nine hole course be used to support other recreational activities, or in this situation, to pay the bond service for the arena - pavilion renovation. Profits from the 18 hole complex would be used as in the past to upgrade and keep this a premier facility. Considerable discussion and questioning by the Council followed which included the increase in demand for golf course season ticket sales, Golf Dome revenues under the present lease, philosophy of deployment of City assets, segregation of recreational operating funds, parking lot improvement to Braemar Golf Course, need for sprinklers over the pavilion ices cost of maintaining additional facilities and depreciation, timing for the bonds sale, cost comparison with other cities' facilities, etc. (Member Richards left the meeting at this point..) John Vallerie, Braemar Golf Course Manager, expressed two concerns: 1) that we not unfavorably impact on the cost of golf for residents, and 2) segregation of funds. and ability to meet any potential future crises at the golf course. Roger Harrold, member of the Golf Committee, observed that the City needs to take a -close look at the long term solution to the arena and pavilion's financial problems so that it may not have to rely on other operations to save itself. As to the projected revenue from the new 9 hole course, he said he felt they were realistic. As to revenue from golf facilities being used for other recreational needs, he said he was not necessarily opposed if assurances can be made for future needs of the golf course. He added that the course itself will need rejuvenation in the future, with some greens needing total redesign and tees needing rebuilding. Following lengthy discussion, Member Turner made a motion to approve the Park Board recommendation for the Braemar Arena Phase II Renovation with award of bid to recommended low bidder, Eagan Construction Company, Inc., at $1,020,000; and to approve construction of the new 9 hole golf course and improvements to the Braemar 18 hole Golf Complex as described in the proposal, subject to bids being awarded following the proposed bond sale. Motion was seconded by Member Smith. Member Turner stated that the motion for approval was based on these reasons: 1) that the arena is an asset to the community that needs to be brought to a level of quality that the community expects, 2) in terms of adding the new 9 hole course, the demand is incredible and there is a need to provide that kind of facility to meet the needs of the changing demographics in the community, and 3) additions to the 18 hole course is a way to keep that facility in top quality. She said there is tremendous justification for proceeding with the project pending the outcome of the bond sale. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *ELECTION JUDGES APPOINTED FOR PRIMARY ELECTION ON 9/13/88. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the following election judges be appointed to serve on the election boards for the Primary Election to be held on September 13, 1988, and that the City Clerk be and is hereby authorized to make any substitutions or additions as may be deemed necessary: Precinct 1 - Eugenia Williams, Chair, Lois Hallquist, Barbara Anderson, Dorie Capetz, Shirley DeLeo, Arleen Friday, Doris O'Neill, Virginia Vonhof; Precinct 2 - Marjorie Ruedy, Chair, Pauline Carroll, Joan Flumerfelt, Dale Jaspers, Sara Kirkman, Ruth Mueller, Kathleen Saterbak, Laurie McKay; Precinct 3 - Linda Smith, Chair, Sherrill Estenson, Carol Bucklin, Marie Goblirsch, Deidre Hedrick, Barbara McDavitt, Christine Morgan, Mary Panchot; Precinct 4 - Shirley Dibble, Chair, Rachel Schoening, Margery Brothers, Virginia Courtney, Georgia Kersteter, Jeanette Lushine, Shirley O'Brien, Helen Stafford; Precinct 5 - Carol McPheeters, Chair, Rosemary McGlynn, Joyce Andrews, Betty Benjamin, Phyllis Cooper, Marjorie Grinnell, Barbara Martin, Mildred Karr; Precinct 6 - Jane Bains, Chair, Catherine Swanson, Sherrill Borkon, Mary Cleaveland, Audrey Clay, Jean Flaaten, Barbara Herbers, Sue Zwakman; Precinct 7 - Bess Brudelie, Chair, Helen Peterson, Kathleen Engquist, Delores Paul, Mary Rowland, Gertrude Snoeyenbos, Avalda Wildermuth, Naomi Ward; Precinct 8 - Jane Moran, Chair, Myra Hykes, Kathleen Bradford, Jeanne Mueller, Barbara Raap, Mona Reding, Lee Strang, Mary Webber; Precinct 9,- Aileen Konhauser, Chair, Jacqueline Lindskoog, Florence Boughton, Bette Comstock, Colleen Crew, Helen Connell, Marilyn Halker, Patricia Monson; Precinct 10 - Barbara Erlandson, Chair, Mary Shoquist, Shirley Byrne, Clare Doyle, Phylis Jensen, JoAnn Lonergan, Kathryn Rivers, Jeanine Westling; Precinct 11 - Geneva Smith, Chair, Sharon Lee Smith, Alice Burnell, Connie Hondl, Kathleen McCarthy, Carol Melichar, Gina Sherman, Lois Steinbach; Precinct 12 - Ardis Wexler, Chair, Shirley Bjerkin, Doris Barry`, JoAnne Chayer, Marjorie Erstad, Carol Hite, Lucy Klos, Phyllis MacLennan; Precinct 13 - Doris Peterson, Chair, Amy Woods, Kathleen Garnatz, Mary Goodrich, Pauline Mertes, Irene O'Neill, June Schmidt, Margaret Polta; Precinct 14 - Mary Jane Platt, Chair, Joyce Hanson, Amanda Bauman, Donna Brastad, Louise Carlson, Lavayne Finberg, Maxine Hatzung, Esther Olson; Precinct 15 - Kaye Luikens, Chair, Jean Hare, Barbara Courtney, Carol Hanson, Carolyn Klus, Sharon Soderlund, Jean Teasley, Judith Traub; Precinct 16 - Mary McDonald, Chair, Nathalie Person, Bonnie Bjerken, Bernadine Chapman, Marlys Chase, Patricia Halvorson, Kathryn Harrington, Donna Montgomery; Precinct 17 - Lorna Livingston, Chair, Jean McDermid, Marie Bachman, Joyce Koets, Fay Clark, Louise Jackson, Joanne Merta, Shirley O'Brien; Precinct 18 - Jean Erdall, Chair, Selma Shelton, Doris Blake, Phyllis Fuller, Elizabeth Genovese, Georgis Kersteter, Eileen Schema, Jo Anne Streed; Precinct 19 - Charlotte Scanlon, Chair, Jean Altman, Linda Anderson, Ardis Dorsey, Luverne Graham, Alyce Hamilton, Erthel Johnson, Jeannine Wurst; Precinct 20 - Patricia Olander, Chair, Anita Delegard, Doris Clegg, Janice Collins, Zelma Gray, Evelyn Herkal, Harriet Koch, Mary Vanek. Motion carried on rollcall vote; four ayes. *STORM SEWER EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT FOR 4909 SUNNYSIDE ROAD APPROVED. Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Turner for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, Linda A. Eugster, is the owner of of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, with identified as PIN 18- 28 -24 -22 -0077; and WHEREAS, there is presently existing, under storm sewer purposes, and certain property situated in the City an address of 4909 Sunnyside Road and and across the property a line for AREAS, Linda A._Eugster and the City of Edina, Minnesota desire to enter to an easement and agreement for the purpose of confirming the existence and location of the pipe, to release claims resulting from the pipe being under the existing house on,the property, and to provide for repair of the pipe and possible relocation of. the pipe;.. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota,.that the Easement and Agreement by and between the City of Edina and Linda Eugster is hereby approved; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Manager are authorized and.:directed to execute the easement and agreement on behalf of the City of.Edina. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PROPOSED SEWER/WATER RATES CONSIDERED: CONTINUED TO 9/12/88. Manager Rosland recalled that at its meeting of July 18, -1988 a presentation was made by Finance Director Wallin regarding proposed sewer and water rate increases. The matter was continued to allow the.Council time to.review the data and for staff to prepare additional information for informing the public regarding reasons for changing the rate structure and the actual rates. John Wallin, Finance Director, said the reasons for the proposed rates were: 1) to eliminate.the inequitable tiered rate. structure (residents would pay only for what they use), 2) there has been no rate adjustment since January, 1987 (City must recover costs of operation), and 3) to cover cost of construction of anticipated new water tower and new well. He explained that 75% of the City's cost for water and sewer are the Metropolitan Waste Control's charges to the City for sewage treatment which are raised each year. A graphic was shown of the current rates and proposed rates as follows: Current Rates Proposed Rates Water $.33 per 100 cu ft $.42 per 100 cu ft Sewer 1 cu ft to 2000 cu ft $20.50 $1.15 per 100 cu ft 2001 cu ft to 4000 cu ft 32.75 4001 cu ft to 7000 cu ft 56.25 7001 cu ft and -over - $1.10 per 100 cu ft Minimum Charge 1 $27.10 $31.40_ The minimum charge would increase to reflect the usage of 2000 cubic feet. He explained that because the system is rated very heavily towards sewer, on a sample basis of 110 customers it was found that by applying the proposed rate system their rates would have increased by approximately 9.6% in total. More of the increase will be picked up by the commercial user than by the individual user. Member Smith said he was concerned about the affect on fixed income people and that he would like to see the minimum stay where it is. Manager Rosland said that, if the Council would like to keep the lower minimum, staff could run those calculations to see how much we would have to increase to cover our costs. He also reminded the Council that on August 15, 1988 the Council would be holding a public.hearing to consider a storm water utility fund which if approved would also be attached to the water /sewer billing. A decision could be made following that hearing as the proposed rates would not go into effect until the winter quarter. Member Kelly said she was concerned about the publicity on this and that citizens would feel they are being taxes for new development (i.e. new tower and well). Following further discussion, Member Smith moved to lay aside the matter of the proposed water /sewer rates, that staff run calculations with the water rate minimum remaining at the current level, and that following the public hearing on the storm water utility on August 15, 1988 that this all be placed on the September 12, 1988 agenda for action. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Walter Sandison, 4612 West 58th Street, commented that the City of Coon Rapids increased their water rates two years because of a new well and increased their sewer rate slightly, but cut the.sewer rate by 50% for senior citizens. Manager Rosland said staff would investigate that. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. APPOINTMENT MADE TO EDINA FOUNDATION BOARD. Mayor Courtney advised that and two names have been submitted as nominees to The Edina Foundation Board of Directors as Council appointment to replace John Skagerberg, namely, Perry Anderson and Eric Ellingson. Following some discussion, motion was.made by Member Smith that Perry Anderson be appointed to The Edina Foundation for a three year term to June 1991. Motion was seconded by Member. Turner. Ayes: Kelly, Smith, Turner, Courtney Motion carried. *PETITION FROM RESIDENTS OF PARKWOOD KNOLLS 21ST ADDITION REGARDING WATER PRESSURE REFERRED TO ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. Motion was made_by Member Smith and seconded. by Member Turner to refer the petition from residents of Parkwood Knolls 21st Addition regarding installation of a sub- station or appropriate.improvement to deal with their water pressure problem to'. o the Engineering Department for study and recommendation. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. CONCERN EXPRESSED REGARDING COMMUNICATING WITH CITIZENS. Member Smith said he is still concerned that we are not communicating effectively with our citizens when we develop and put into action plans such as the current watering ban, that it is evident from the phone calls that people are not informed and do not understand the reasons. He suggested the City publish quarterly. some type of "good neighbor" bulletin that would fully explain issues such as watering ban, parking, trash at curb and snow removal which are in effect at various times of the year. Manager Rosland responded that staff is investigating how this might best be done and funded and will continue to work on communicating with the public. Mayor Courtney said he had a call from a resident regarding having a complete watering ban and wanted to know why the Council had not called an emergency meeting regarding this. He said he had told her that there was a regular.meeting today, August 1 and she had commented how would the public know when the Council meetings were held. He added that citizens are not attempting to find out when regular meetings are held so that they can talk about their concerns and concurred that there is a lack of communication. CONCERN NOTED REGARDING PROPOSED LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT. Member Smith commented that he would like to see a resolution drafted and sent to Hennepin County Board of Commissioners asking that there be participation from the communities on the issue of Light Rail Transit and the funding of the proposed system. He said at least there should be a Council and /or staff representative from each city that would have some voting authority on policy making issues. Manager Rosland pointed out that, Sue Covnick, represents Edina on an advisory committee for Light Rail Transit. Mayor Courtney said he was on the Intergovernmental Advisory Committee for Light Rail Transit and that he had not agreed with some of the actions that were taken because residents of Edina would have to travel part of the way to their destination in order to use Light Rail Transit. Member Turner suggested that.the subject of the next steps in Light Trail Transit and how Edina can participate in the process be placed on the agenda in September. This would give the Council time to think about how that resolution should take shape. Member Kelly said she felt it was important that Commissioner John Keefe be at that meeting. WATER LINE BREAK ON KELLOGG AVENUE DISCUSSED. Member Kelly reported that she had received a call regarding a water line break on Kellogg Avenue on Friday evening that was not repaired until today (Monday, August l) and that water was running all weekend. Manager Rosland responded that normally breaks are repaired promptly but that there has been an amazing number of water line breaks recently. He said he would check on this. PARAMEDIC RESPONSE QUESTIONED. Member Kelly questioned the normal response time for paramedics and in specific the response for a man that had collapsed at the Edina Art Center recently. Assistant Chief Kehoe explained that normal response time is under 8 minutes and that he would check on the incident referred to and provide additional information to Member Kelly. CONCERN NOTED REGARDING LOT SPLITS. Member Kelly said she was concerned about the number of lot splits occurring because of redevelopment. She said even though we have the Comprehensive Plan and the Zoning Ordinance that regulates redevelopment and has confidence in the Community Development and Planning Commission's recommendations, she is uncomfortable about this. She said there seems to be pressure to be building and building and that she would like to have open areas protected and leave opportunity for single family homes. She suggested that the Council consider scheduling this issue for a special meeting with the City Planner and.the Community Development and Planning Commission. WATER BAN /SPRINKLING DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland said that staff has had calls and letters saying there should be a total ban on sprinkling and others have said they should be able to water all they want - that the City has mismanaged its water. He said that the staff has taken a middle road to try to manage the water. With the City of Minneapolis requiring a complete sprinkling ban, people feel we should be doing the same. Basically, he said he has been telling citizens that the City has taken a middle road position with lawn sprinkling allowed only on an even -odd system, with no lawn sprinkling allowed between 9 :00 a.m and 9 p.m. and that if the City's current sprinkling restrictions are hurting the aquaifer, which the DNR does not feel it is, then this should be dealt with on a metro -wide basis daily. As to the Mississippi headwater problem, that is a different problem and maybe Minneapolis should have begun managing their water sooner. He asked the Council if they would like to consider any further restrictions. Mayor Courtney commented that this has developed into a political issue with the northern communities dominating as to the Mississippi River problem. He said at this time he did not see a need for going to .a total sprinkling ban, with the exception of the Morningside area which uses Minneapolis water. Member Turner said that the plan that the City has followed so far is a responsible one based on factual information and that she supported the position as stated by Manager Rosland. Member Smith said that he concurred and asked that staff respond to the letter of Thomas Bennett Wilson that was addressed to Senator Storm and Representative Forsythe regarding the City's sprinkling policy. No formal action was taken. ti. 1989 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS. PRESENTED AND DISCUSSED. Manager Rosland introduced the new computer program that staff is using as a management tool to develop 1989 budget assumptions. He then presented the 1989 budget assumptions summarized as follows: Scenario 1: Total Revenues $12,617,843; Total Expenditures $12,617,843, 8 Increase Expenditures 6.26 %; Tax Dollars Needed $9,172,648 (below levy limit $46,431); Tax Dollar Increase $573;505, 5 Increase in Tax Dollars 7.04 %; 1988 Mill Rate 12.34. Comparisons were given of effects on residential homes and commercial properties if the Scenario 1 budget were adopted.'. Manager Rosland also presented proposed new programs which are recommended by department heads showing Scenario 1 (middle road) totaling $324,610; Scenario 2 (including all new programs) $482,242 and Scenario 3 at zero with no new programs included. He recommended Scenario 1 for consideration by the Council. Discussion followed with the Council requesting further information regarding levy limits, and comparisons of services, salaries and comparable worth adjustments with other cities. No formal action was taken. *CLAIMS PAID. Motion was made by Member Smith:and seconded by Member Turner for payment of the following claims as per pre -list dated 8/1/88: General Fund $154,928.62, Art Center $1,383.42, Capital Fund $409.01, Swimming Pool Fund $2,594.12, Golf Course Fund $22,604.90, Recreation Center Fund $2,527.25, Gun Range Fund $838.05, Edinborough Park $6,869.17, Utility Fund $240,128.19, Liquor Dispensary Fund $21,400.14, Total: $453,682.87; and for confirmation of payment of Claims dated 6/30/88: General Fund $285,765.45, Working Capital Fund $822.22, Art Center $1,480.59, Swimming Pool Fund $1,006.35, Golf Course Fund $24,259.18, Recreation.Center Find $6;173.72, Gun Range Fund $439.36, Edinborough Park $9,072.46, Utility Fund $40,253.82, Liquor Dispensary Fund $464,753.35, Construction Fund $58,829.99, Total $892,856.49. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. There being no further business on the Council agenda, motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Kelly for adjournment. Motion carried. Adjournment at 10.50 p.m. City Clerk A. Cn O • �N�URPOW`��O • 1961) i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III. From: Francis Hoffman Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: August 12, 1988 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Storm Drainage 0 To Council Utility Hearing Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize development of an ordinance for stormwater utility with the utility start date of 1/1/89. Info /Background: The City staff has expended considerable staff time during 1987/88 reviewing the City Storm Sewer System. The system includes pipes, ponds, stormwater detention areas, and creeks. The City has over the years constructed new facilities through the development process and special assessment to project areas. The maintenance needs of the system have increased over the years and the two major rain storms of 1977 and 1987 suggest a policy review to create an additional movement of floodwaters from private to public areas, i.e., Braemar Golf Course from surrounding neighborhoods. The idea of a storm drainage utility is not new. It began over ten years ago with development of system changes similar to water, electric and sanitary sewer utilities. Report /Recommendation August 12, 1988 Storm Drainage Utility Hearing Agenda Item III. Page Two A storm drain utility is similar to a sanitary sewer utility. This is true because it deals with a substance that is normally unmeasured as it leaves properties which produces a by- product which affects others off the site. Also stormwater requires some type of control after it leaves the site which is similar to sanitary sewer systems. The question as to why the development of a storm drain utility needs further comment. The staff believes that development of the utility is the right approach for a community that has reached one hundred years- and has many portions of the earlier construction needing replacement in the next decade. Also, as developments occur and the standards of storm water engineering evolved, programs for storm water should be adjusted. The staff believes the advantages of the utility would be the following: A. Fair - charges would be based on how much problem the property creates: Property taxes on the other hand frequently have little relationship to how much or what quality storm water leaves a site. B. Dependable - the funding technique produces consistent funding levels and no competition develops for these funds for other City activities. Storm drainage, historically, is an emotional subject as to who pays. C. Legally Defensible - more and more, special assessment projects are being challenged in the courts with benefits being difficult to allocate to properties on high ground which drain their water downstream. D. Tax Levy Reduction - the tax levy can be reduced by no longer funding these activities from the general funds supported by taxes. E. Flexible - the fee system is very adaptable to meet local situation, both individual sites and city wide. Credits should be provided for local site "assists in the utility billing process. The use of the utility fund typically would be used for administration, planning and routine maintenance of system as a minimum. If appropriate and attainable, it. would be desirable to include construction of additional facilities to provide better quality treatment to the run off, reduce flooding or erosion. The utility is not proposed to serve areas not yet developed. The developers should pay for their installation of new systems. s Report /Recommendation August 12, 1988 Storm Drainabe Utility Hearing Agenda Item III. Page Three The rate structure was developed around a two inch rainfall with different types of property having typical percent of impervious surface resulting in a certain amount of runoff. From the above information, runoff factors were developed for types of property. The single family rate and runoff were then used as a standard equivalency factor for development of other rates. Staff. will demonstrate some examples of this during the Council presentation. A utility service charge table is attached. for review. It does not reflect any credits on individual properties and reflect any credits for properties still paying special assessments. We believe credit be considered for individual properties currently paying for previously levied special assessments. Also attached for review are: A. Notice sent to all property owners. B. Letters sent to City on subject matter. C. Graphic indicating a sample utility service charge minus any credits for special assessment or site credits. D. Comparison of other cities employing a storm drain utility. (Additionally, Bloomington is currently developing the fee structure and staff has commented that the rate structure would be very close to Roseville.) The staff will provide more information during the presentation at the Council meeting on 8/15/88. arr of E ®IIVA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 -8861. Dear Edina Resident/Property Owner: Edina proposes to use a new technique to pay for costs of maintaining and protecting the infrastructure of our stormwater runoff system —a Storm Drainage Utility. This Storm Drainage Utility would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates than residential properties. The expected quarterly fees for various types of properties are shown below: Single Family Homes and Duplexes ................. $ 5.00 /Lot Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses .................$3.36 /Acre Schools .... ............................... $15.90 /Acre Churches, Institutional and Multiple Family Dwellings ..... $40.35 /Acre Commercial and Industrial ...................... $67.25 /Acre The City of Edina is aging. Our stormwater system, originally built by the assessment process, now needs updated maintenance and capital improvements. The major rain storm of July, 1987, demonstrated that opportunities also exist to route stormwater from private to public properties providing better overall performance of the stormwater system. % All three of these concerns will be directly addressed through a Storm Drainage Utility fund. The results will be as follows: • Increased protection for people and property • Reduced insurance risks • Improved property values community-wide If the City Council adopts the Storm Drainage Utility, the City will be able to accomplish a number of important goals related to Edina's storm water handling system. Among these goals are to: • Maintain existing storm water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time • Provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows • Replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due to natural deterioration The Edina City Council plans to hold a public hearing on the Storm Drainage Utility on Monday, August 15, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall. You are invited to attend. Also, further information can be obtained by calling the En- gineering Division at 927 -8861. BURKE SALES COMPANY 5113 WEST 58TH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55436 TEL: 929 -3046 MANUPACI7/RERS REPRESENTA77VES 1 August 10, 1988. *:E. Marcella M. Daehn, City Clerk, City of Edina, 4801 West 50Th St., Edina, Minnesota 55424 In my 34+ years as a resident,-and homeowner in our beautiful City, I have .witnessed marry proposals for projects offered by varioussCity officials*. Some very good, others very bad !! One of the latest is the possible addition,-@f a, " St©rm Drainage Utility ", just one more effort to secure more tax dollars from the citizens!!! In�an article appearing in the August 1987 Sun- Current newspaper, several of our City officials were quotec% as saying, "this July storm was a fluke, it probably wouldn't occur again.in.a hundred. years. We see no reasons for spending monies to alleviate the minimal damages suffered " --- A year lateri our.-.officials are singing.an opposite tune !! Credability ?? Evidently the statements of today do not necessarily apply to tomorrow ! I wish to go on record at the City Hall meeting on August 159-1988, as 10070 against the Storm Drainage Utility as now proposed. Thank , Joseph W .Burke WHITE OAKS IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION 4701 Meadow Road Edina, MN 55424 Dr. Donald G. McMillan 612- 922 -0834_ President August 11, 1988 The City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th. Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Friends: Recently Edina residents and property owners received a notice concerning a proposal for the creation of a Storm.Drainage Utility in Edina. We are certainly in agreement on the goals related to-Edina's storm water handling system as stated in this notice. There are several water holding areas in the White Oaks area of Edina that now serve as an integral part of the existing handling system. One of those areas is a portion of land which includes a lot adjacent to and north of the residence at 4701 :Townes Road. This same lot is now offered for sale by Andron Development Company through Edina Realty. When we received heavy rains last summer this property collected • very 'large amount of water and held.several feet of water for • number of days. If the -lot in question is developed we will lose a very significant storm water handling system in that area. It is the desire of the residents of White Oaks that this area be preserved as a storm water holding area. If the land in this area is developed which would require a significant land fill, then it could no longer function as it'does now in the storm water handling system., We would be happy to work with the Council and the Engineering Department to achieve our goal which is to keep the storm water holding area that we now have. 'Thank you for your cooperation. Si erely yours,/% Dr. Donald G. McMillan President Omar..... Robert G. Fletcher 4301 West 42nd Street Edina, ,ln . 55416 Augrlst. 6, 1988 Mr _ Wayne Courtney Mayor, -City of Edina, 4801. West. -50th Street, Edi.ia, Mn., 55424 Dear Maayor Courtney: e.: Storm Drainage !Ji-A lity The proposed schedule of fees prompts a question: What. is a lot? The answer tO this question indicates a possii_,i1ity of un- warranted di.spariry in amounts paicl toward this Facilitv. Perhaps a lot is any area conrain:irfg a single family home or duplex or zoned for •such dwelling. Perhaps a lot is a platted plot upon which sur_li dwellings or parts of dwellings are located, where- by there may he.two or, more lots involved for a residence. If a lot is a platted plot the size may Vary greatly. Lots 66 2/3 feet by 135 feet, 75 feet by 200 feet, 100 feet by 200 feet all P,,-.Iv $5.00 - Or $24.20, $15.00, or vlO.:7 an acre respectively. If the platted lot is undeveloped it should perhaps pay no more thEkh a golf course, cemetery or park per acre. (Probably- less since .there is no building or pavement.) J own no undeveloped land in Edina The proposed schedule is simple but probably isn't just.. Why shouldn't payment for- this uti 1 ity�i be on assessed Valrre of property? Vory t:rul.y t'our's, L,%� l Robert G: F tche �`' �� 9 ASO INC. CONCRETE & MASONRY CONTRACTORS 7175 CAHILL ROAD EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 TELEPHONE: 6121844 -7700 August 5, 1988 City of Edina 4801 W. 50TH. Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: City Engineer Reference: Storm Drainage Utility Dear Sir: In regard to the proposed updating of the storm water system. I believe that you are over reacting to the problems created by the storm of July 1987. I do not believe that-the finest storm water system in the world could have prevented what happened, that is just too much water in.that short a period of time to be handled by any storm water system. I believe you are trying to find a cure for a hundred year event and the question that needs to be asked is, is it cost effective to be doing this, I believe not. In addressing what you consider will be the results of this undertaking, I believe there probably will be reduced Insurance Risks, but also believe that they will be minimal at best. As.far as increased property value and increased protection for people and property, I just can not buy these arguments. Our properties already have a.storm water system that works adequately. You can not stop water run off, so the property is going to erode regardless and a better protection for people would be education. In closing and summary, I do not believe that a new storm water system is needed. Sincerely, JESCO, INC. David Olson r VICE PRESIDENT OF FINANCE DO;JL EQUAL OPPORTUNITY AND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612 - 927 - 8861, Dear Edina Resident/Property Owner: Edina proposes to use a new technique to pay for costs of maintaining and protecting the infrastructure of our stormwater runoff system —a Storm Drainage Utility. This Storm Drainage Utility would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates than residential properties. The expected quarterly fees for various types of properties are shown below: Single Family Homes and Duplexes ................ .. $ 5.00 /Lot Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses ..... '............$3.36 /Acre Schools ..... ............................... $15.90 /Acre Churches, Institutional and Multiple Family Dwellings ..... $40.35 /Acre Commercial and Industrial ...................... $67.25 /Acre The City of Edina is aging. Our stormwater system, originally built by the assessment process, now needs updated maintenance and capital improvements. The major rain storm of July, 1987, demonstrated that opportunities also exist to route stormwater from private to public properties providing better overall performance of the stormwater system. All three of these concerns will be directly addressed through a Storm Drainage Utility fund. The results will be as follows: • Increased protection for people and property • Reduced insurance risks • Improved property values community-wide If the City Council adopts the Storm Drainage Utility, the City will be able to accomplish a number of important goals related to Edina's storm water handling system. Among these goals are to: • Maintain existing storm water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time • Provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows • Replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due 'to natural deterioration The Edina City Council plans to hold a public hearing on the Storm Drainage Utility on Monday, August 15, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall. You are invited to attend. Also, further information can be obtained by calling the En- gineering Division at 927 -8861. to I Vt 4�61NA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 Dear Edina Resident/Property Owner: Edina proposes to use a new technique to pay for costs of maintaining and protecting the infrastructure of our stormwater runoff system —a Storm Drainage Utility. This Storm Drainage Utility would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates than residential properties. The expected quarterly fees for various types of properties are shown below: Single Family Homes and Duplexes .............. Q. $ 5.00 /Lot a67 '5 a- Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses ................. .36 /Acre Schools .... ............................... $15.90 /Acre Churches, Institutional and Multiple Family Dwellings ..... $40.35 /Acre Commercial and Industrial ...................... $67.25 /Acre The City of Edina is aging. Our stormwater system, originally built by the assessment process, now needs updated maintenance and capital improvements. The major rain storm of July, 1987, demonstrated that opportunities also exist to route stormwater from private to public properties providing better overall performance of the stormwater system. All three of these concerns will be directly addressed through a Storm Drainage Utility fund. The results will be as follows: • Increased protection for people and property • Reduced insurance risks • Improved property values community-wide If the City Council adopts the Storm Drainage Utility, the City will be able to accomplish a number of important goals related to Edina's storm water handling system. Among these goals are to: • Maintain existing storm water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time • Provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows • Replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due to natural deterioration The Edina City Council plans to hold a public hearing on the Storm Drainage Utility on Monday, August 15 1988 at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall. You are invited to attend. Also, further information can be o tained by calling the En- gineering Division at 927 -8861. L��r� �-JV 4,� � �o � _ z"T' • ���2�r -fie �2G�� �J, AUCI To t -ecity Council, i. oppose the proposed storm drainage utility. The storm of July 187 was a fluke.._A that tiae a city official suggested that. it would be false economy to try to flood -proof all.of Edina for such unusual events. 1 couldn't agree more. Those who build in low areas or near water do so knowinj the risks involved. I do not care to subsidize somebody else's mistake. Other reasons I oppose the proposal; 1. The feds aan only go higher over time. I could see �3p0 per year becoming $50 or $100 per year in few years. It is expensive enough to live here already. 2. The benefits and goals referred to in the city's letter don't really help residents "city wide ". My property velue won't really . be affectdd at all., Please vote this proposal down. We have enough government already. 06& _iiihard Maxwell 5.104 W 58th St Edina, MN 55433'6 Engineering Dept. City of Edina: More information should be given to Edina residents (tax payers) -- before any decision is made on this storm drainage. proposal.. We are not against progress, but we will not pay for developers (Southdale, the Laukka properties, etc.) to ensure their _: �--- financial gain., The engineers of Edina have already made mistakes (Vally- View Road to France and York etc.).. Those responsible will have to be accountable. �4e should not sacrifice Edina to greedy scams) Your letter is simply signed "Engineering Dept. Ours is signed... Edina Residents HEDBERG PARTNERS. 87 3725 WEST 76TH STREET • EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 PHONE (612) 831.4040 August 8, 1988 City. of Edina 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: Engineering Department RE: Storm Drainage Utility Gentlemen:. I wish to confirm my understanding, based on a telephone conversation with Mr. Obermeyer on August 4, that there is no Storm Drainage Utility fee proposed to be charged against any.vacant undeveloped land in the City of Edina. such as the approximate 87 acres of land we presently own in the vicinity of 76th and France Avenue so, If there is misunderstanding on my part or any additional information I should be aware of concerning our undeveloped vacant land as it pertains to the proposed Storm Drainage Utility, I would appreciate being so advised. Yours truly,_ HEDBERG PARTNERS 87 John W. Hedberg Managing Partner pl S A L E UTILITY SERVICE CHARGE i Std.2" No. of Acres/ Classification Type X Rain Quarterly Yearly Type Area Dvellina Units Run Off Factor Impervious Run Off Charges Total Charges Total Single fi Double 13,014.00 Units 1.00 25X .24 5.00 65,070.00 20.00 260,280.00 Family Multiple 262.46 Acres 3.00 50X .56 40.35 10,590.26 161.40 42,361.04 Commercial 687.90 Acres 5.00 85% 1.24 67.25 46,261.28 269.00 185,045.10 Schools 184.59 Acres 1.25 30% .30 15.90 2,934.98 63.60 11,739.92 Churches 92.87 Acres 3.00 50% .56 40.35 3,747.31 161.40 14,989.22 Institutional 64.94 Acres 3.00 50% .56 40.35 2,620.33 161.40 10,481.32 Parks 664.69 Acres :25 4% .09 3.36 2,233.36 13.44 8,933.44 Golf Courses 768.51 Acres .25 4% .09 3.36 21582.19 13.44 10,328.76 Cemeteries 43.37 Acres .25 4X .09 3.36 145.72 13.44 582.88 Industrial 325.00 Acres 5.00 85X 1.24 67.25 21,856.25 269.00 87,425.00 Total $632,166.68 j Note: Average Lot Size 16,165 SF or 2.69 Lots /Acre .37 Acres /Lot i Example (Multiple): 2.69 Lots /Acre x 262.46 Acres = 706.02 Multiple of 3 2118.06 Lots = 2118.06 x $5.00 = $10,590.26 $10,590.26 - 262.46 $40.35 /Quarter CITY OF ROSEVILLE Single Family Homes & Duplexea . . . . . . . $ 4.29 /Lot Cemeteries & Golf Courses $ 3.25 /Acre Parks & Parking Lots $ 9.75 /Acre Schools & Community Centers . . . . $ 16.25 /Acre Multiple Family Dwellings & Churches $ 32.50 /Acre Commercial /Industrial $ 65.00 /Acre CITY OF APPLE VALLEY Single Family Homes Duplexes & Townhouses $ 4.20/Lot Golf Course . . . . . . . $ .30 /Acre Zoological Garden . . $ 3.00 /Acre Schools . . . . . . . $ 8.40 /Acre' Apartments $ 30.87 /Acre Churches & Institutional $ 11.38 /Acre Commercial /Industrial . . . $ 33.39 /Acre CITY OF RICHFIELD Single Family Homes & Duplexes . . . . . . . $ 4.35/Lot Cemeteries . . . . . . . . $ 5.44 /Acre Parks & Railroads $ 16.31 /Acre Schools & Institutional $ 27.19 /Acre Multiple Family-Dwellings & Churches . . . . . . . $ 65.25 /Acre Commercial . . . . . . . . $ 108.75 /Acre PROPOSED CITY OF EDINA Single Family Homes & Duplexes . . . . . ... $ 5.00/Lot Parks, Cemeteries & Golf Courses . . . . . . $ :: 3.36 /Acre Schools . . . . . . . . . . $ 15.90 /Acre Churches, Institutional, & Multiple Family Dwellings . . . . . . $ 40.35 /Acre Commercial /Industrial $ 67.25 /Acre o e , �o; REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: August 12, 1988 Subject: Public Hearing Traffic Signal Hazelton Road at Byerly's /Leisure Lane Driveways Agenda Item # zv.A. Consent [] Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action [� Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: (A) Authorize traffic signal subject to Council discussion on appropriate financing of signal; or (B) Continue.for further action on 9/12/88 Council meeting. Info /Background: Byerly's has appeared before the Edina Traffic Safety Committee requesting consideration on installation of a driveway signal on Hazelton Road at the Byerly's /Leisure Lane western entrances. The firm of Barton /Aschman has completed a traffic study which indicates a traffic signal would be appro- priate and warranted. (See attached information.) A public hearing notice was sent to the four property owners on the west end of Hazelton Road. (See attached notice.) Hazelton Road is a state aid eligible street and fifty percent of the signal cost would be eligible subject to state aid approval of the signal warrants study. The other fifty percent of the cost would have to be assessed to abutting property owners. The staff recommendation would be to distribute assessment cost based on traffic generated at the driveways. This method was employed on France Avenue for the traffic signals at Southdale Shopping and Office Centers between West 66th and West 69th Streets. Report /Recommendation August 12, 1988 Public Hearing Traffic Signal - Hazelton Road at Byerly's /Leisure Lane Driveways Agenda .Item # N.A. Page Two The past history on traffic signal funding has occurred as follows: (A) Signals on County Roads and Municipal State Aid Streets have been funded from City State Aid Funds with the following exceptions: (B) West 70th Street at Cornelia Drive was fifty percent state aid and fifty percent assessed. (C) Driveway signals at Southdale Office.Center and Southdale Shopping Center on France Avenue were one hundred percent assessed based on driveway volumes. c r The Byerly's located on Hazelton Road east of France Avenue is a high traffic generator.- In addition to grocery and related sales, the store has a large popular restaurant in the same building. As a result, store trip generation is higher during the early. morning► noon, and in the early evening when external traffic is also heavy. Because of the imposed access restrictions, Byerly's has one major t entrance /exit point and a parcel pick-up service driveway on Hazelton . Read. t The parcel .pick -up driveway is mostly exiting volumes frcm that facility. 1: It is not used by drivers in the primary parking lot because of the circuitry of. access and egress. Due to the large volume of traffic entering and exiting Byerly's in the one primary driveway, a safety and congestion concern has been raised. To help eliminate this problem Byerly's has attempted many solutions. In early 1986, Byerly's submitted a request for the no right turn on red signing at 'FYanoe Av e nue and Hazelton Road. The purpose of the submittal . was to try to improve the .ease of access and reduce. the hazard for traffic L: exiting - Byerly's parking area. The need was perceived from customer cmplaints and observed backups at the subject driveway. Changes in the driveway design had been made by Byerly's to try to ease the Problem. Dual outbound lanes were provided. Zhis improved the observed L backups which had been extended sufficiently to, block the parcel pickup lanes on the north side of the store. . A request had also been . submitted to Hennepin County to allow a riot -turn in only movement to Byerly's lot off northbound France Avenue, near -72nd Street.- That request was denied by the county. It would have served the function of reducing northbound right -turn volumes off of France even more efficiently than the no riot turn on red sign which was requested later. %wly's has also considered and followed up on a proposal to reduce existing problem , P by Pi��� an access connection to the Dayton s store parking lot near the southwest corner of Byerly's parking lot. The Dayton many concurred but the change has yet to be Uplemented because of cost 1' and its limited ability to correct the continuing problem. The results of these attempts to inprove the safety and congestion at this intersection did not have a significant effect on the problem. Therefore , L Barton- Aschmnan was retained by Byerly's to analyze the need for a traffic l control signal. at the intersection of Hazelton Road and the west Byerly's driveway. Figure 1 shows the site location as well as any existing traffic L signals in the area. PROPOSED SIGNU INST r.r MON L In the event the proposed signal is approved and funding is available, the City of Edina would, install a five- phase, fully actuated traffic signal with L L iw•E+.we... «:: wr;s k� � ss.� .....,✓ �,v ". ' n %. 4.-e b ..,.� a °�". �^eY -;�.`k +a�.�.T� s,.. � 1 �«.a �. <3 '�e�.aza.'x� f ��"4 -rte• ,� �Yrr�`g�^' " e � � cr. eA�. Er, -,.z �= ....D,R , j p �: .•ai ',S L 7.s Li ��F`'< 'Yi•gY ?c. ,� 5� �5���`��'k E,:, �'% ��} b t AEI NO ip in ='�� �:4F��,�'3 i,a `::• � �i;.,e � �„ °'E� �„;' � �" ".. � j a� V ,z g .� t 1 �t �4 s r ^�s t3�, ,.': � � �,y„� �,. _ .e� .4 �• CS ",`,:r :� o �. , V�vn{, ^. ✓E t h s s. �? ri �(.4, s # f _..1 a 7. ;1 4. t' r,�5la N, "SS Z� �' .+i E�� a?A 3 /d yy t'i ♦'{ je <�,..,! 1�'°'.F4rs�`sY, f,,,lY 6a ,� �, ` y' €' #�� � � b ''r ¢ ef�.ol a di ,t'. n. {J "� ^ s. t �, � •,�, "� �_' �r �'�. ■'"� � �. .ems �` �; , ,,,! ���� ������ � � "�' b L�i�At6t 'V� � � F'i ! A.bi�sts,- g,4 r ��, ae ar x! o .. 5 I :;s c» `w.:. y --✓ ca:`.� " 3 .�°" ,w,.,....,.. rw*+�►'a--- ...- ""K"yj 1 ",'% ', u�'srji xi.� �, .,� � •` �'j �f; � � � , ^�� v- x �, � p s...,...,. ...... -w � d �S �,°' �6 a .r 1�` � r !v v � ?� ��� ..,�- .,„,,,..: verse,, �.�.±_— ±+�- +- -,y, y. � •,.,.�.,a,,,,, � ,,.,_„ -a., ..�..++ /� �`�p�� a� r'��'�'�+u, �7+ {� ���„�r�•5�. y� s� 5�. � (� ,it � � ! .fir ,� �� s f5 ' f f � r t � � •� � h `,r £ %� " � r .i� y "K Sf S �`".x�,f'ss � ;.1 � 1 £' } � �,• d ��g °,as,i.y+t'� SW IT s•�e ° " ;1 T I'"'` t ,r"` e, ;:�k• .�„r��. srr�? y $ � ,�:a�e+� � � x �t • i �':.� ,�� � ,;,�, . r �rvx.y. -+, ps.�� s+: "alI SV °W ! `e t.ry �r v ! t i + 1 a, �q iz #��;�a'.T �' Yfi M, MIJ '2l' -. �� i_•._ ._ y ,• .its t e, y�: i'i!z.»r3 e�� �t tS "' `� ��� t.. �• �' ,1�.. ^ -rAtb' j. �: r ,_ p "��#• ,! i q % a� ". a� {d, ^`�+,r�ey yt s� c , i �{- �dz � 1 �' s4;,�` � � . .;€� a 9' A' 7. ^, i+` •ix f&,. %•. . � gfa'kt k: � �'` �i'.� �, iN' � hs � ,;� ar+,�, i r to �.�; k' �. l �.., 1'3" """""+� •.. }A7'nr� Y.' �.`F#� "st �;e +"° § #•; .r � �� •' z `�'�';� -< ��� "fcr, ,. ` r `r r� �' �` w ;al 1 k . },. .� � tat x:':.r .� t � r )f �f db �:• fgv'z e rl gy 'A. "'.e'"'""'"I"- a°2'*T'? " M^, k �, y',%k i°+"•`5� -�f,'R {�' �'�4, ut,+sn.$.. r'S'�s� 'f' ,?!34r, °°'�t,`, .l �,..��..... dartnn- ecrh.r»n A mast anas on the Hazelton Road approaches. Pedestrian indications and push- buttons will be provided for all crosswalks. Hard -wire interconnect will be provided connecting the. Franoe Avenue/Hazelton .Road signal with the.- Proposed signal. The proposed signal could be constructed as early as the 1989 construction season. CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO., P -88 -8 S.A.P. 120 - 166 -01 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Monday, August 15, 1988 at 7:00 P.M., to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429: The approximate cost of said improvements are estimated by the City as set forth below: Hazelton Road at Byerly's /Leisure Lane Driveways ESTIMATED COST TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT NO. P -88 -8 $ 70,000.00 S.A.P. 120 - 166 -01 This hearing has been called as a result of a traffic safety study conducted by a consultant for the City and Byerly's. One ,recommendation was to signalize the driveways to Leisure Lane and Byer.ly's. The signal installation is eligible for fifty percent funding from state aid funding sources. The remaining fifty percent or $35,000.00 requires a local funding source. The possible.source of local funding is Special Assessment to benefited properties. Obviously, City Council could use any combination of the above alternatives listed above to finance the cost. The construction of this project, if approved, is proposed to occur in 1989. If a portion of this project is assessed, the assessments would be levied in 1989 with the assessment payable in 1990. The area that may be assessed is Lot 1 and 2, Block l; Lot 1 and 2, Block 7, Yorktown Addition. Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please call me at 927 -8861 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.. Thank you. Francis J.'Hoffrnan, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer a 60' o e '� 1 ";., /c; ..ONE To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: August 15, 1988 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Subject: 5 -88 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval for Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd. Addn Recommendation: Planning Commission. 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Developers Agreement. .4. Watershed Approval. Info /Background: Agenda Item # -Y---A- Consent [❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance Preliminary Plat Approval as recommended by the The proposal was twice heard by the Planning Commission. On July 27, the Commission recommended approval of the attached, 3 lot, preliminary plat. Discussion at the meetings was centered on Lot 4 and the location of the new house on the lot. The Commission recommended that the new house on Lot 4 should have a front street setback similar to the existing homes on Fox Meadow Lane. The house immediately east of Lot 4, Bob Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane, is set back 36 feet. This would be the minimum re- quirement for the new house on Lot 4. Our rules do not prescribe a maximum setback. The developer has suggested a setback of between 50 and 60 feet for the house. I would suggest a front street setback between 36 feet and 50 feet. DRAFT MINUTES P. C., JULY 27, 1988. MEMBERS PRESENT: G. JOHNSON, H. MCCLELLAND, J. BAILEY, G. WORKINGER, V. SHAW, J. PAULUS III. OLD BUSINESS: S -88 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval For Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition. Michael Halley Homes, Inc. Generally located west of Blake Road and west of Fox Meadow Lane extended. Mr. Larsen presented his staff report and noted a revised preliminary plat for the subject subdivision has been submitted. The three new lots measure 23,750, 22,500, and 34, 500 square feet respectively. All of the lots exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. The proposed lots are approximately the same size as those originally proposed, but are slightly narrower at the suggested building setback. The lots are now more conventional in shape which allows the house on Lot 4 to be moved closer to the street. Also, it will not be a problem to build on Lot 4 at or above the recommended elevation of 942 feet. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval subject to 1) Final Plat Approval. 2) Developers Agreement. 3) Subdivision Dedication. 4) Water Shed approval. The proponent, Michael Halley of Michael Halley Homes, Inc. was present to answer questions. Mr. Halley told the Commission the average lot size of the lots on the revised plat is around 28,000 square feet. He added he is not adverse to a front yard setback stipulation of 50 -55 to be placed on Lot 4. He pointed out the elevation of the proposed house on Lot 4 is 952 feet. Mr. Robert Jenecek, representing Mr. Robert Ulrich (property owner directly east of Lot 4) told the Commission Mr. Ulrich agrees with Mr. Halley's proposal of either a 35 foot conservation easement or placing the proposed house at the required front yard setback line. He pointed out Mr. Ulrich is in agreement with staff's recommendation of removal of the cul de sac but questioned if Mr. Ulrich's landscaping and brick work would be continued to the street when the street is "straightened ". Mr. Halley indicated he would be willing to make the necessary improvements to Mr. Ulrich's landscaping and brick work if the proposal is approved. Commissioner McClelland told the Commission the revised plan is an improvement but indicated she is uncomfortable with the house placement on Lot 4.. She added.she would like to see a 20 foot conservation easement between Mr. Ulrich's property and the proposed Lot 4. Mr. Halley explained he would comply with Ordinance standards adding it is his understanding that Mr. Ulrich would find it acceptable for the proposed house to either meet the average front yard setbacks or provide the conservation easement. Mr. Halley said his revised plan meets the average front yard setback requirement. Commissioner McClelland expressed concern about crowding. Mr. Larsen pointed out the property in question is heavily wooded which should minimize any negative impact if the proposed house is sited at the established front yard setback which Mr. Halley has indicated he would meet. Mr. Roy Jenson, 5124 Blake Road expressed concern over future developments along Schaefer Road. He noted in his opinion this proposal is more attractive .than the previous proposal for Oak.Ponds lst Addition but questioned " when is enough enough ". With graphics he pointed out possible subdivisions along Schaefer _,Road. Commissioner G. Johnson- told.Mr. Jenson trying to speculate where future subdivision may occur is very risky. He added it is his understanding that the City has looked at a number of scenario's regarding this issue. Until a firm proposal is submitted to City Staff, the Commission cannot speculate. Mr. Jenson expressed frustration that something more concrete cannot be established-regarding this area. He added many lots, including his, will not be able to be developed due to different factors. Commissioner G. Johnson agreed with this,observation. He pointed out as an example the Dinwiddie property which lies directly south of the proposal. He added that as a body the Commission can act only on what is submitted. Commissioner Paulus moved to recommend approval of S -88 -6, subject to staff conditions and the further recommendation.that the house placement on Lot 4 should be the average front yard setback of the house along Fox Meadow Lane. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye—Motion carried. ti� Ts SUBDIVISION, NUMBER S-88-6 L O C A TI O N West of Blake Road and West of Fox Meadow Lane REQUEST Create 3 additional lots EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT L A N a• MAROLO WOODS :t. Y. sc d��_. .vyrysd�� •S - Fi' I � ?wl U. 3. �. 'la R•. tT - -_O ! �•"'t. ? e ••': �` W WOOD COURT ••� r ��� Q ' �.x " }dJr Y ,t h: ROAD �s� fO "•.. • - �J 1 �. -- -' a Lam' r L WOi - - -- -� w SUBDIVISION, NUMBER S-88-6 L O C A TI O N West of Blake Road and West of Fox Meadow Lane REQUEST Create 3 additional lots EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT M E M O R A..N D U M TO: Planning Commission FROM: Craig Larsen, City Planner SUBJECT: S- 88 -6., Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition, Michael Halley Homes DATE: July 27, 1988 J Attached is a revised preliminary plat for the subject subdivision. The three new lots measure 23,750, 22,500, and 34, 500 square feet respectively. All of the.lots exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. The. proposed lots are approximately the same size as those originally proposed, but are slightly narrower,at the suggested building setback. The lots are now more conventional in shape which allows the house on Lot 4 to be moved closer to the street. Also, it will not be a problem to build on Lot 4 at or above the recommended elevation of 942 feet. PROPOSED: OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN 2ND_ ADDITION Nom• I •I•.w 0 Y ' '� `j V 1 11 I ii►I�y I ' I i_ Y J•a•1 DEVELOpE1L MICHAEL ttAUEVIpai S. INC. SURVEYOR. EGAN, FIELD &WMAtl, INC. Om Souhbut Crawled 74501apaa le "hers - ,IIDIS Viking prime - Sine 310 MMnupon; Not "M Eden prairie, MN 93344 To�Hlom Na -%&-W7 T■b■hone H. -gaa -106 a SCH I P11UN, Lots 20 - i 21.Audllor's Subdivision Number 3E5, Hennepin County. Minnesota, e 1 MraOy artily Ina thb pia •u tee.ele0 A aN ar unbr 1.1' alr•ct auArvlalen aM by 1 r a duly 1119h om Law Sul unow the IN of the St" of Mlnmsu. Dated this 11111 dry ot Meg R1L EGAN. FIELD L N0WAL, INC. Survet• . LEGEND. • Telephone boa bf (�i, • � .—/ l �( ♦ Street light ar1Li N, WhNsh Gala valve Mlmnaa Llcama N. 11233 oCebla boa Manhole • Hydrant Lace, -.o,. M.iv I I I I•awv I � •era One Southwest Crossing 1.1095 Viking Drive - Suite 380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612) 944 -1056 August 3, 1988 Mr. Craig Larson City Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 - RE: Proposed setback for Lot 4,.Block 1, Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition Dear Craig: At the recent Planning Commission meeting I believe it was stipulated that the front yard setback for the above lot be in conformance to Bob Ulrich's home on Lot 1, Block 2, Oak Ponds of Interlachen. I have enclosed a copy of the survey for his home and lot. My concern is that I hope the council will simply stipulate a'50 foot front setback for my Lot 4. As the survey shows for Ulrich's lot, the garage front is setback about 35 feet from the existing cul de sac, which will be removed. Therefore, I understand that Ulrich's garage doors will then be about 50 feet from the straightened out street in front. Ulrichs' front door with the new straightened out street will measure about 66 feet from the street right -of -way. Will you please simply ask the council to stipulate on Lot 4, Block.1, 0ak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition that the front yard setback be not less than 50 feet and no more than 60 feet? This will be simple for us and achieve the intent of ::the Planning Commission. Yours truly, ichael A. Hal dy) MAH :vn enclosure File # 4 -28 -10 July 22, 1988 Mr. Craig Larson City Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Craig: Unfortunately, I will be in New York on Wednesday, July 27, and will miss the planning commission meeting. As I indicated at the last meeting, I find Michael Halley's agreement to either leave a 35 foot natural greenspace or to place the house close to the street compatible with the other houses in the neighborhood acceptable. As of July 13 he sent me a letter saying the setback of the house would be consistent with my own. If that is the case, it is fine with me. The remaining concern would be to have the old cul de sac eliminated and the brick driveway and compatible shrubbery and trees extended without expense to Mr. Kunz or myself so a quality look is preserved in the neighborhood. I am sending Jill Dahlin and Bob Janecek to represent me at the meeting in case any questions come up . arrK you for all of your help. S' ce el B Ulrich 6221 Fox Meadow Lane Edina, MN 55436 cc: Michael Halley MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY DEVELOPM SZERS NNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, 88, AT 7:30 A.M. EDINA CITY HALL CO ` MEMBERS PRESENT: Act ing Chairman, Gordon Johnson,.Helen McClelland, Lee Johnson, David Runyan, Virginia Shaw, Del Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: William Lewis, John Palmer, Jane Paulus, John Bailey, Geoff Workinger STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, City Planner Jackie Hoogenakker, Secretary I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES• Commissioner McClelland moved for approval of the June 1, 1988, Community Development and Planning Commission Minutes. Commissioner D. Johnson seconded the motion. All were in favor. The motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: S -88 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval for Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition for Michael Halley Homes M ' General West of Blake Road and West of Fox Meadow Lane Location: extended Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property comprises two large lots which front on Schaefer Road. Each lot is about 2 1/2 acres in size. Mr. Larsen explained the proposed preliminary plat proposes to develop the rear portion of-the two lots. The proposal would create three, new single family lots. The lots would contain 26,000, 22,000 and 31,500 square feet respectively. The lots would be served by the westerly extension of Fox Meadow Lane. The proposed lots meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. Mr. Larsen pointed out the new lots are shown as lots 2, 3 and 4 on the attached preliminary plat. Lots 2 and 3 occupy relatively high ground. Lot 4 falls off to the south. Because of the shape of the lot, the house on lot 4 will be 10 to 20 feet below the homes on lots 2 and 3. There is an existing small pond southwest of lot 3 and 4. There is also a pond on the lot immediately north of the subject property. During last years July storm, these pond areas flooded a large area and had to be pumped down since they have no outlet. Staff has requested a storm water analysis of the proposed development. Mr. Larsen concluded development of the rear portion of the large lots in the Blake, Schaefer area has long been expected. Some development has occurred, most recently to the property immediately east of the subject property. The lots in the proposed plat are slightly larger than those in the original Oak Ponds subdivision and also larger than those in the Taft addition on the west end of _Striver Road. The proposed development does allow for future development to the north by continuing the right of way to.the northerly property line. This has been a requirement placed on other developments in the area. The proposed building pad on lot 4 is of some concern to staff. The shape of the lot forces the pad location much further back than that of the adjoining properties. It would be better if this lot were developed closer to the street and at a higher elevation. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note staff has not received a storm water analysis for the development. Conditions to Preliminary Plat Approval should be: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement 3. Subdivision Dedication The proponent, Mr. Michael Halley was present. Mr. Halley explained to the Commission he sees no difficulty in adjusting the proposed house on lot 4 to accommodate the impacted property owner, adding it would work better from a development standpoint if the house could be positioned to the rear of the property as proposed. He said the impacted property owner may wish to consider a 35 foot conservation easement along the adjoining lot line as an alternative to moving the house on Lot 4 forward. This would afford him the privacy that may be lost if the house is positioned as proposed. Commissioner L. Johnson asked Mr. Halley and City Staff what will be done with the existing cul de sac on Fox Meadow Lane when the road is extended. Mr. Larsen replied it would be staff's recommendation that the existing cul de sac be removed. Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Halley if he contacted Mr. Dinwiddie, 5225 Schaefer Road (property directly south of the proposal) regarding this proposal to discuss the possibility of Mr. Dinwiddie adding a rear portion of his property to this development. Mr. Halley told the Commission he contacted Mr. Dinwiddie and they did not reach an understanding regarding Mr. Dinwiddie's property. Mr. Larsen added he has met with Mr. Dinwiddie and discussed possible options but did not reach any concrete conclusion. Commissioner McClelland explained. to the Commission the problems the watershed district has had with the ponds, siting last years flood as an example of possible future flooding problems for homes if the subdivision is approved as presented. She added she felt a 3 lot subdivision is too dense for this site. She pointed out that the topography of the land and the ponds are factors that should be seriously considered when reviewing this proposal. Commissioner McClelland added in her opinion a 2 lot subdivision works better on this site. Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Larsen what would the average lot size be for the 3 proposed lots. Mr. Larsen indicated the average would be around 25,000'square feet. Mr. Ulrich, 6221 Fox Meadow Lane told the Commission he has a concern regarding Lot 4. He explained if the proposed house is constructed as indicated, it will be in his rear yard. He recommended that the proposed house be resituated on the property more toward the front. Mr. Ulrich said Mr. Halley's proposal of a 35 foot conservation easement which would run along the joint property line has merit. He added another concern is the existing cul de sac. He agreed with staff's recommendation of removal of the existing cul de sac. Commissioner McClelland pointed out there is more flexibility regarding appropriate land use in siting two homes on this site. She added the property owner at 6221 Fox Meadow Lane would not have to worry about a house being placed in his rear .yard if the site were to be developed with 2 houses. Commissioner McClelland said she cannot support the location of the proposed house on Lot 4 as it is indicated on the preliminary plat. Commissioner L. Johnson suggested that the proposed 3 houses be more balanced off the cul de sac at the setback line. He indicated he favors a 2 lot.subdivision or a balance of house ' placements on the 3 lots and a re- arrangement of the lot lines to accommodate the balance. Mr. Halley asked the Commission to note that the proposed subdivision meets all Zoning Ordinance standards. He added if he balances the 3 proposed houses on the front setback line many trees would have to be removed. Commissioner G. Johnson asked Mr. Halley if he would be agreeable to approaching Mri Dinwiddie again to see if somehow his property could be incorporated into this proposal. Mr. Halley told Commissioner G. Johnson he would make an effort to speak with Mr. Dinwiddie. The discussion continued with the Commission expressing concern about the submitted proposal. Their reasons centered around the design and development of Lot 4 and the topography of the site, including potential ponding problems. Commissioner L. Johnson explained to Mr. Halley that he would like to see the preliminary plat revised to accommodate their concerns. He added if a balance of the 3 lots is submitted he would like to see a pad on each site indicating the front yard setback line. Commissioner L. Johnson noted it is not a requirement to indicate building pads on a preliminary plat but in this case it will help the Commission arrive at a educated decision. Commissioner McClelland requested that Mr. Halley also indicate the houses on the two adjoining lots on Fox Meadow Lane on the revised plat. Mr. Halley requested continuing item 5 -88 -6 until July 27, 1988 to allow more time to re- design the plat to reflect the Commissions concerns regarding the topography and Lot 4. Commissioner Runyan moved to continue item S -88 -6 until the July 27, 1988 Planning Commission Meeting. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All were in favor. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 6, 1988 S -88 -6 Preliminary Plat Approval for Oak Ponds of Interlachen 2nd Addition for Michael Halley Homes General: West of Blake Road and West of Fox Meadow Lane extended The subject property comprises two large lots which front on Schaeffer. Road. Each lot is about 2 1/2 acres in size. The proposed preliminary plat proposes to develop the rear portion of the two lots. The proposal would create,three, new single family lots. The lots would contain 26,000, 22,000 and 31,500 square feet respectively. The lots would be served by the westerly extension of Fox Meadow Lane. The proposed lots meet or exceed Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. The new lots are shown as lots 2, 3 and 4 on the attached preliminary plat. Lots 2 and 3 occupy relatively high ground. Lot 4 falls off to the south. Because of the shape of the lot, the house on lot 4 will be 10 to 20 feet below the homes on lots 2 and 3. There is an existing small pond southwest of lot 3 and 4. There is also a pond on the lot immediately north of the subject. property. During last years July storm, these pond areas flooded a large area and had to be pumped down since they have no outlet. Staff has requested a storm water analysis of the proposed development. Recommendation: Development of the rear portion of the large lots in the Blake, Schaefer area has long been expected. Some development has occurred, most recently to the property immediately east of the subject property. The lots in the proposed plat are slightly larger than those in the original Oak Ponds subdivision and also larger than those in the Taft addition on the west end of Scriver Road. The proposed development does allow for future development to the north by continuing the right of way to the northerly property line. This has been a requirement placed on other developments in the area. The proposed building pad on lot 4 is of some concern to staff. The shape of the lot forces the pad location much further back than that of the adjoining properties. It would be better if this lot were developed closer to the street and at a higher elevation. r At this writing staff has not received a storm water analysis for the development. This should be available at the Commission meeting. Conditions to Preliminary Plat Approval should be: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Developers Agreement 3. Subdivision Dedication 0 PROPOSED: OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN 2ND A e \ • I YI I \ 1;3 That part of List M Auditor's Subdivision Number 325, Hennepin County, A4nnesas when ties eagerly of a line drawn from a point on Irks North line of said Lot 20 distant 245 feel Westerly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 20to a point on the Soutn lineal said W 20 distant ICS bet Westerly of the Soulneast 'Corner of said LA ZQ I herebv certty Ina thh pia was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Ina L am a duly Registered Lad Surveyor under the Lars of the Slate of Mlnnesdta. Dated finis 171n day of May, 1983 EGAN, FIELD . NOWAK, INC. Surveyors by; (e;p' brute %. (.rlvna Minnesota License No. IM3 ,r rs�e 4 � r Iewe Z .' ✓j DEVELOPER: MI AELHALLEYNOAE S. INC. SURVEYOR: EGAN, FIELD &NOWAA, INC. 1 One st Crossing - 7115 Wayzata boulevard '.'TIDyS Viting Drive - "Suite 380. - 'Minneapolis. MN 55126 La'Ry --M rP . Eder, Pyairie, MM 8364 - . Telephone No. • 50-W7 Telephone Nn - %4 -s0ib •',• '���i - . ::DESCRIPTION: ..': .: -. _._ -:.. - ....... .. ... .' -.~� *' .I I ' `ate • '� Lot 21, Audltorts Subdivision Number 325, Hennodln County, Minnesota. �O •`�' . ,�• \, .o That part of List M Auditor's Subdivision Number 325, Hennepin County, A4nnesas when ties eagerly of a line drawn from a point on Irks North line of said Lot 20 distant 245 feel Westerly of the Northeast corner of said Lot 20to a point on the Soutn lineal said W 20 distant ICS bet Westerly of the Soulneast 'Corner of said LA ZQ I herebv certty Ina thh pia was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Ina L am a duly Registered Lad Surveyor under the Lars of the Slate of Mlnnesdta. Dated finis 171n day of May, 1983 EGAN, FIELD . NOWAK, INC. Surveyors by; (e;p' brute %. (.rlvna Minnesota License No. IM3 � r Iewe Z .' ✓j 1 i�M7' All, '. o e � �; REPORT/RECOMMENDATION ''�IIIOM�"V • � To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: August 15, 1988 I Subject: S -88 -8, Preliminary Plat Approval for Hed Addn. Agenda Item # v. A. 2. Consent ❑] Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Approve Preliminary Plat subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Changes. Info /Background: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal at its July 27, 1988 meeting. One of the attached letters, Donald McQuarrie, 6625 Mohawk Trail, mentions a decision by the Minnesota Court of Appeals finding the Private Covenants of Indian Hills were enforceable. That decision was overturned by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court found that the covenants had expired. a DRAFT OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON JULY 27, 1988. MEMBERS PRESENT: G. JOHNSON, H. MCCLELLAND, V, SHAW, J, PAULUS, J. BAILEY G. WORKINGER S -88 -8 Preliminary Plat Approval for Hed Addition, Virgil and Sharon Hed General.Location: 6625 West Trail, Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills. Mr. Larsen presented his staff report noting the subject property is a developed single family lot with an area of 79,207 square feet. Normally we would want to see the property split more evenly than is the case here. However, in this case a more even division of the property would require removing the existing house. The present proposal maximizes the size of lot 2 while saving the existing home. The entire property is heavily wooded and the .house is barely visible from the street. A division which would require removing the existing house may disturb the site more than the present proposal. The proposed new lots will remain among the-largest lots in this area of Indian Hills. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends Preliminary Plat approval conditioned on: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Charges. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Hed were present. A discussion ensued with the Commission in agreement that the proposed . subdivision has merit due to the continued consistency in the size of the lots after subdivision. Commissioner McClelland moved to.recommend approval for 5 -88 -8 subject to staff conditions.. Commissioner Bailey seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried. WI OF c1l.- d F I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND.STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT JULY 27, 1988 S -88 -8 Preliminary Plat Approval for Hed Addition, Virgil and Sharon Head General Location: 6625 West - Trail, Lot 1, Block 10, Indian Hills. The subject property is a developed single family lot with an area of 79,207 square feet. The proponent has submitted a preliminary plat which would create one new buildable lot. The existing house would remain. The new lot would contain 34,277 square.-feet, and the lot for the existing house would contain 44,930 square feet. The new house is proposed fronting on Iroquois Trail._ Both lots comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements for single family lots. The proponents have surveyed in excess of 40 lots in the immediate vicinity to determine lot size. A map of the properties surveyed and a table comparing these lots to the proposed lots is attached. Recommendation Normally we would want to see the property split more evenly than is the case here. However, in this case a more even division of the property would require removing the existing house. The present proposal maximizes the size of lot 2 while saving the existing home. The entire property is heavily wooded and the house is barely visible from the street. A division which would require removing the existing house may disturb the site more than the present proposal. The proposed new lots will remain among the largest lots in this area of Indian Hills. Staff recommends Preliminary Plat approval conditioned on: 1. Final Plat Approval. 2. Subdivision Dedication. 3. Utility Connection Charges. co \\ 7Q% o PROPOSED H E D ADDITION Owner and Developer: Virgil Hed 6625 West Trail Edina, MN 55435 Tel No. 944 -6456 DESCRIPTION: _ Lot 1, Block 10, INDIAN HILLS 1 hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me'or under my .direct supervision and that 1 am a Registered Land Surveyor under the laws. of, .• , the State of Minnesota. Dated this 13th day of July, 1988. CARLSON b CARLSON. INC. LAND SURVEYORSi 8713 Dupont Avenue South Bloomington, MN 55420 Tel. No. 888 - 2084 - y ` , Mf dsota License No. g018 NOTES: Total Area Is 79,207 Sq. Ft. or 1.818 Acres. Area of Lot 1, is 44,930 Sq. Ft. or 1.032 Acres. Area of Lot 2 1, 34,277 Sq. ft. or 0.787 Acres. Zoning is R -I Denotes proposed retaining wall. Circled elevations are proposed. ++ ' INDIAN HILLS A 15.48(4 4.` r i ;ARROWHEAD.r' °s `3a,'4 }'aa "E gyp` •t� D °�Lbt 1 ��. HILLS 1 I 2N0 ro �P'ki• 2A00.°9. ,�vi INDIANzcL4�.�°�+'` lza , 6 Ap - s4.24 /oe� 95.3 �` �s,�, '� 110 sae �� ;oo v 1 ^'�►} f;o y`N77ZJ44w ySm %j,A9 IsO * y oo 3 ;o - � 9.43i4o'fo , °�H ti 13 " t v c's 3 w 20,ZA °/y pti` ^�! N75j8•e. _,1 N , .. N 4340 4 n �a. 56 0 4QO• Ra.i 13 2 N7C51 bP '3 a. - •^ 14� ., 6 • 5e Ft�' fr. °+.- ti -Z - 12 h 2 ° r2f93z c a y7. 3 �O e �• per' �5. v' $. /77 SS M - - 6 +,A 1 s: 5 L _� �'L��� c t o 6 I \ q� 5 0 i. 2 151 13 w �i z - zs o c- , I.38 ® Ira $ v 1 . ` cast 11J :clt 50 % E �. to c T o �I L� ©y. w ZO.Ob Z 20 x.105' � ' /'9 �� �p� - 3 11 3 8� - ,� ate' 1� •a a- Ez °_ Q s 9 r ;IO M. iI v 2�i! . ��. - (n` Z a. `� o ° ` °��3IQl Q •• L -S 38.4 I A 120.01 60 20 ' �" 98 Z 1 �cr)�: J i5S06 O IbL.B Y s APACHE zl h o I�ISaw o bi3 `f,l� 3 C IQ 10 055 33.4 0 cr 10 y 4 a = I ` Easter :- °'1p'k'3/•e N84' ;i'S4 �n O .� I oM 2 3 `S24,, 5 y:w 17 �1'� z ` /East - ", o •� 52 " . f4+ f 4f. - 110 0 0 1 °=`_ a 5�"°r o � t,f,ll �,1,Ib o v .3 I18 U , ;30 o LO 3'�7 �1 b(cl b w 9 5 r 6 5 2 4 _ 3 2 �_ �� N _ M K E - M �7�; - - •• _ - li8 f 1 t 3Ar 6.7� I -�r4+> � F .. � �,� `-•., v � o - `ZO TRAIL -Jb Od a9 .� `3 1 40 _ 1 Z O, f Zo rt I ao ! l S k/o /7 i4" Its g 4 3 _ 2 jselz 1 trALroy - - lyr8.o4d 114 / Ta Al- 4=2715 s�T Lt'f i Ptu�rsil,t le•c!'}r .W -yl 4a6z 144.44 ►,f,24 v 1LP !z0 104.51 '.. o .fo1.E1. �� ? bo - 35 zS 1z3 49 `► t� r>). � o. %5 I'm TRA /0 ~i% i$•, 8ocr1 �3u• I, 6"'Y�o' • ^ a w C4'•- 9 fi 11 - o- 'r2._�iwil♦ .. _�} �- 11y .e is fi54`. �� � j . d+• X53' �� >�I , ... = ys � � ho-`T � -.,�, / � - AN1UEL -- _T `RO sf,*"°`� 'r dew. w �-�r- =4 `, 1 i.. y, -i �"� " 105 to 114 Ifb' - IZl3 i 6. ^• 50 LOt99' L91 L� o of y= s.0 L o r iza t la0 E 0 5Jr41'50E_ 3061 G6' s.f'!G43 It+lia PART y OT ft ` - 2 -- 3 .f 4� 6 .^ .- •' 2 a6 •ro . fti. °' ` '„`", ,. � . - rt4 O X72'0 . �� 1'7738 �\G9 e,JI KYl Y •'a I•t� }� � r .0-1 ° �1 - r Z63 .7f 4-SIOUX: � i R =aao o i0•� f- _ �� (o�(j R �a• 48' �' ,;`',°,t Y TRAIL 3 - rf"kz' w .� � � ' �(h�oYY7�' o . �3 • .oq' t� F IS ? +LV37• X3.61 .39+ 3 e (.J� y�° Ntl y �_ ~� • r PART � ff • �w,� 4 5 6 c- ` 7 P o _ /0 367o'w (ibis - x 1� G �1� r o =4 4141 WEST 436.16 1 _ - .'S 3'O1'SZ" 58902 ti N of s a p J 1 3 s i 4 53 -0 44 _O 4 !6Zr3 r PQ UTE- d. /3• 9d ~ mod, a� ` (3' s I OLT e .v �+ .P 2 1� o ? 191,/6 .• Rij07rq r� d p C 2 1' 69.7 jst7i9 O I Aid r� OUTLOT a-..� •• - 0 6 I �Sp 1 ZI ��VF/ 9 By 1^ 9 iy � � I � :3 v �i• ;E V 2 (' 3j.� ` .d'+ 'NO " ° - 3 n <~ Q a2�. 1 4L2 5 17E� Z'�.1 - ", 2q7 y w Irrz at,�I l5 0 4 ° •� . '<< 's4 / I o 6 z 71.77 \_ ` H4i6 .10.04- ADDRESS LOT SIZE HOUSE RATIO FRONTAGE SQ.FT. SQ.FT. FEET 6625 WEST 1 NEW LOT #1 TRAIL 80,000 2,208 A276 ORIGINAL LOT - 2 6808 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 46,000 41,440 2,208 2,328 .0480 120 3 6628.IROQUOIS TRAIL 36,720 1,958 .0562 .0533 58 135 4 NEW LOT #2 34,000 140 5 6804 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 32,750 2,736 .0835 75 6 6817 PAIUTE DRIVE 31,840 1,615 .0507 92 7 6629 WEST TRAIL 29,920 1,970 .0658 206 8 6805 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 29,120 2,608 .0896 74 9 6608 IROQUOIS TRAIL 28,960 2,812 .0971 175 10 6616 IROQUOIS TRAIL 27,360 3,209 .1173 175 11 6609 IROQUOIS TRAIL .26,240 1,732 .0660 165 12 6617 SALLY 13 6613 LANE 25,,750 1,435 .0557 151 IROQUOIS TRAIL 25,440 1,319 .0518 165 14 6621 SALLY 15 6821 LANE 25,250 3,105 .1230 250 PAIUTE 16 6612, DRIVE 24,640 2,093 .0849 97 IROQUOIS 17 6617 TRAIL 24,640 1,800 .0731 150 IROQUOIS TRAIL 23,680 1,714 .0724 165 18 6801 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 23,040 1,889 .0820 133 19 6705 SALLY LANE 22,680 2,106 .0929 145 20 6800 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 22,500 . 1,932 .0859 81 21 6612 MOHAWK TRAIL 22,080 1,646 .0745 150 22 6621 IROQUOIS TRAIL. 21,960 1,613 .0735 165 236817 SALLY LANE 21,760 1,631 .0750 105 24 6608 MOHAWK TRAIL 21,150 1,920 .0908 150 25 6813 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 20,520 2,244 .1094 67 26 6616 MOHAWK TRAIL 20,480 2,242 .1095 150 .27 6813 SALLY LANE 19,440 1,656 .0852 82 28 6613 SALLY LANE 18,945 2,262 :1194 110 29 6620 IROQUOIS TRAIL 18,280 3,852 .2107 200 30 6813 PAIUTE DRIVE 18,090 2,330 .1288 92 31 6620 MOHAWK TRAIL 18,000 2,404 .1336 164 32 6809 IROQUOIS CIRCLE 18,000 1,932 .1073 93 33 6609 SALLY LANE 17,190 2,711 .1577 110 34 6605 SALLY LANE 16,785 2,775 .1653 164 35 6804 PAIUTE DRIVE 1 16,290 1,714 .1052 90 36 6801 PAIUTE DRIVE 15,480 1,352 .0873 92 37 6902 PAIUTE CIRCLE 15,210 1,649 .1084 109_ 38 6709 SALLY LANE 14,040 1,950 .1389 95 39 6809 PAIUTE DRIVE 14,040 1,757 .1251 97 40 6800 PAIUTE DRIVE 13,950 1,565 .1122 108 41 6809 SALLY LANE 13,770 1,933 .1404 79 42 6801 SALLY LANE 13,140. 1,300 .0989 95 43 6805 PAIUTE DRIVE 12,870 1,821 .1415 98 44 6808 PAIUTE DRIVE 12,870 1,788 .1389 101 45 6805 SALLY LANE 12,420 1,300 .1047 46 6900 PAIUTE DRIVE 11,970 1,352 .1129 .95 95 47 6812 PAIUTE DRIVE 11,070 1,795 .1621 107 MEDIAN 21,150 DONALD G. MCQUARRIE, M.D. .Ala f" we- �� .t -[•max• �,r.� -s-aP� a.�z� , ��- ��� ,�-� ��a- 6625 MOHAWK TRAIL, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 C- A•,�,�. C - 8� - mss- _ � �� z.. �-�e_. .6L�ie Q i21i�Lv o-t-Q- /1/G ex, go, � — JAMES H. MCCARTHY 6628 IROQUOIS TRAIL EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 4-AZe. 5-cf�-o V. �•t�Z G �--�� �L�.`C {ems L r .'� /� fCS / Ll,ezg�Ldi� -�/� 11,e d� C %L' C Gap k' 41 ru //'�ff"�i(.��•�.. (j1,2 li/yti L wL�'1�G CIL� L't-- �7/pL- t�i��/LLt'+ -�V�P G y_ -- --- August 8, 1988`. City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424. RE: Case #S -88 -8 Gentlemen: I received the notice of public hearing regarding the referenced case on Saturday, August 6, 1988. Since this is a traditional vacation time, it may well be.that interested neighborhood, parties may not be available for the meeting scheduled on Monday, August 15, 1988. In my case, I will be out of town on a business /vacation trip. I request a delay in any decision on this property to enable me to learn more of the particulars. I have several concerns regarding the aesthetic and financial impact of the proposed subdivision. I request that you postpone a decision on this matter for.30 days to allow a reasonable time for evaluation by the neighborhood stakeholders. Sincerely, Denis H. Langhans 6616 Iroquois Trail- Edina, MN 55435 c 6624 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55435 August 9, 1988 Edina Village Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina,-MN 55424 Sirs; As a property owner adjacent to proposed subdivision on Mohawk /Iroquois, we are adamently opposed to the project. We have been residents for 24 years and we could all decide to divide and therefore, destroy the carefully envisioned environment by Mr.' Burton for which we all bought and built. The existing covenant still has.strong.support for which the entire Indian Hills Area wishes to protect. 'S I am unable to attend thecouncil meeting on Monday, but wish to cast strong opposition to the proposal. Sincerely, Dr. & Mrs. Harold G. Richman Agenda Item V.A.2 MOORHEAD MACHINERY & BOILER COMPANY OftFfAgO 3477 UNIVERSITY AVENUE N.E. SINCE MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55418 3 o TELEPHONE: 612- 789 -3541 9 V ; s Q` y/ 1917 & (V •.a — yF9 August 11, 1988 City of Edina Planning - Department 481 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Sub - Division Lot 1, Block 10 Indian Hills Virgil and Sharon Hed Planning Department: As a neighbor, the writer is concerned; it would be my hope that the proposed sub - division would enhance the neighborhood. Without having seen architect's sketches, etc. it is impossible to make a judgment. I expect that the planning board will provide for structures that will compliment the area. Sincerely, p � o.- hn K. Moorhead JKM /j sr �6701 %rar/ Ot�3A. ,Lrt. O4 e 7f n in REPORT/RECOMMENDATION °� • ���11.OM� To: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: August 15, 1988 Subject: C -88 -2 Conditional Use Permit Edina Community Lutheran .Church Recommendation: Agenda Item #.v- B• Consent [] Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA El To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance The Planning Commission recommended approving the Conditional Use Permit subject to a Proof of Parking Agreement. Ak Info /Background: The Planning Commission, City Staff, the church, and neighbors all supported the proposed parking variance to avoid disturbing the flood plain areas on church property. The Planning Commision, however, felt uncomfortable granting the variance without a proof of parking agreement. Staff did not recommend a proof of parking agreement for several reasons. 1. The increase in seating capacity is small, only 23 seats. The church is not embarking on a growth program. 2. The flood plain area is the only place to develop more parking. This area is approximately 16 feet lower than the existing parking lot making it undesirable parking. Most people would continue to use the street. 3. Cars can park on both sides on 54th Street without disrupting traffic flow. 4. Present church activities have not caused problems for the neighborhood. For the above reasons I continue to believe that a proof of parking agreement is unnecessary in this case. DRAFT OF MINUTES P. C. MEETING HELD ON JULY 27, 1988. MEMBERS PRESENT: G. JOHNSON, H. MCCLELLAND, F. SHAW, J. BAILEY, G. WORKINGER J. PAULUS C -88 -2 Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West 54th Street General Location: South of West 54th Street and west Halifax Avenue Mr. Larsen presented his staff report and noted according to church officials the intent of the addition and renovation project is to better accommodate existing needs and not to prepare for any significant increase in congregation size. The seating capacity increase is very modest. The existing building would benefit from the proposed renovation. The building design and the soft, natural materials seem appropriate for the site. Early site development schemes illustrated parking in the flood plain area. Developing the parking would require some fill and the disruption of the natural conditions existing adjacent to the creek. Staff encouraged the church to avoid any activity in this area. In this case some on- street parking is a desirable alternative to the alteration of the natural condition of the floodplain. The proposed expansion and renovation should be beneficial to the church as well as the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with a 29 space parking variance. Mr. John Cunningham, and Foster Dunwiddie representing the Edina . Community Lutheran and interested neighbors were present. ,i A discussion ensued with Planning Commission Members, City Staff, the. church and neighbors all in favor of avoiding any disturbance to the flood plain areas on church property. Commissioner G. Johnson recommended that a proof of parking agreement be entered into between the Church and the City. He.explained the City has traditionally requested this measure to insure.if the demand for parking increases the need can be met.. He pointed out it is a measure the City has required of other churches. Commissioner McClelland supported Commissioner G. Johnson's recommendation and added that the City's Engineering Department may be able to look into the possibility'of widening West 54th Street in front.of the church similar to the street cut (parking bays) on the side property line of St. Stephens Church. Residents of the area strongly expressed their opinion that the flood plain must remain as it is, untouched.. They had concern regarding the recommendation of the Church entering into a proof of parking agreement with the City. Mr. Richard Weigel, 5421 Woodcrest Drive, Mr. Nyhus, 5441 Woodcrest Drive, Mr. Clemetson, 5427 Woodcrest Drive explained how important it is to the residents on Woodcrest Drive to retain the natural buffer afforded by the present vegetation. They pointed out if the church needs . more.parking the flood plain may have to be disturbed and that is not an option they want the City to consider. Commissioner G. Johnson explained a proof of parking agreement allows a means for discussion between the City and the Church should the parking demand increase. The flood plain may never disturbed, other means may be implemented to meet parking needs. Commissioner Paulus moved to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit_ for_C_ -88 -2, subject to staff conditions and the recommendation'that_ the City and Church enter into a proof of parking agreement. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion- .carried. Z COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 27, 1988 C -88 -2 Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West 54th Street General Location: South of West 54th Street and west Halifax Avenue Edina Community Lutheran Church has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to build a new sanctuary and convert the existing sanctuary into a fellowship hall. The new sanctuary will seat 210 people which is an increase of 23 seats over the present sanctuary. The project includes remodeling the interior of the existing building. The exterior of new sanctuary will be finished with cedar shakes and stone trim to match stone on the existing church. The existing building will be resided with cedar shakes to match the new addition. The church property measures 4.73 acres in size. However, much of the area is within the flood plain of Minnehaha Creek. The flood plain elevation, varying between.863 and 864 feet, is illustrated on the attached survey. No building or other obstructions maybe placed in the flood plain. Consequently, the only buildable area is the northeasterly portion of the site. All of the proposed construction is above the flood plain elevation. The proposal calls for rebuilding the existing parking area to the south and west of the church to accommodate 41 cars.. The existing parking area is unstriped. It accommodates 25 -35 cars. With seating for 210 persons, the Zoning Ordinance requires 70 parking spaces. In order to provide the required parking the church would need to locate the additional parking within the flood plain area. Development of parking in the floodplain is possible within the rules of the watershed and the City Zoning Ordinance. The church has elected to request a parking variance to avoid disturbing the natural conditions existing adjacent to the creek., Overflow parking would occur on West 54th Street, similar to the condition that exists today. Recommendation According to church officials the intent of the addition and renovation project is to better accommodate existing needs and not to prepare for any significant increase in congregation size. The .seating capacity increase is very modest. The existing building would benefit from the proposed renovation. The building design and the soft, natural materials seem appropriate for the site. Early site development schemes illustrated parking in the flood plain area. Developing the parking would require some fill and the disruption of the natural conditions existing adjacent to the creek Staff encouraged the church to avoid any activity in this area., In this case some on- street parking is a desirable alternative to the alteration of the natural condition of the floodplain. The proposed expansion and renovation should be beneficial to the church-as-well as the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit with a 29 space parking variance. CONDITIONAL" NUMBER x_88_2 L O C A T 10 N 4113 West 54th Street REQUEST Building Expansion EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 4113 WEST 54TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 • CHURCH OFFICE (612) 926 -3808 • MAnK S. HANSON. PASTOR July 13; 1988 Craig Larson, City Planner Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mr. Larson, The following information summarizes the use of the facilities of Edina Community Lutheran Church, 4113 West 54th Street. On Sunday mornings we have worship at 8:30 and 11:00 a.m. with an education hour at 9:45. The average attendance at the combined services is 235. Generally the attendance patterns at 8:30 run from 60 -110 and at 11:00,from 110 -200. There are usually about 75 -100 adults and 100 -125 children present during the education hour. Sunday is the peak use time of the building. On Monday evenings there are usually 90 people in the building. Tuesday evenings the average is 20, Wednesday evenings will average 40. Thursday evenings averages 40. During the week days there are 6 -7 staff and 30 children. Events such as weddings, funerals and special church functions have fluctuating attendance patterns. We have worked very hard to be in contact with our neighbors regarding our proposed "facility and parking changes. On Wednesday, June 8th members of our Facility Planning Committee met at church with neighbors who live on Woodcrest Drive and have houses facing Minnehaha Creek. Ben and Sue Crabtree personally invited the neighbors to that discussion. On Monday, June 13th a discussion was held with neighbors who live within 500 feet of the church. Letters of invitation were sent to approximately 83 households for that meeting. Both conversations were convened by Foster Dunwiddie, member of our Facility Planning Committee. It is my understanding that those in attendance at these meetings strongly supported the concept of upper level and street parking. They realized this would require a variance in parking codes and would result.in.more on street parking. The neighbors were not supportive of proposals that would require using the land near the creek for off street parking. It is my further understanding that the neighbors have expressed a desire to sign a petition next week indicating their support for these proposals. Those names will be submitted to you at the end of next week. We thoroughly appreciate your assistance in our planning process. We value the fine relationship that exists between members o- f.Edina Community Lutheran Church and the City of Edina staff and residents. Cordially, MArk S. Hanson Pastor ss _ EDINA COMMUNITY LUTHERAN CHURCH 4113 WEST 54Th1 STREET- EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424• CHURCH OFFICE (612) 926.3808• MARK S. HANSON. PASTOR June 7, 1988 Dear Friends, As you may know, we at Edina Community Lutheran Church are making plans.' to improve our facilities. We are considering a plan to build a new worship space behind our present sanctuary and remodel the existing building for better support to our ministries. Later this summer, we will be asking the city.of Edina for a conditional use permit so that we can proceed with this project. Since you are our neighbors, we know that you will be concerned with this process, and we want to discuss our ideas with you. I would like to invite you to meet with the Facilities Committee at the church on Monday, June 13, at 7:30 p.m. We wi-11 be happy to answer your questions *''at that time, but we also want to know your concerns and ideas. Light refreshments will also be served. Our architect is very impressed with the way our building fits into this neighborhood. Whatever we do with our facilities, we want to preserve this sense of belonging to the neighborhood. We appreciate your help in meeting that 'goal . Sincerely yours, J. Andrew Holey, Chair Facilities Committee ss L-DINA (bNAMUNITY LUTE -1 EIZAN CHU RCf =1 4113 %vFS r sari 1 s r ner_ r rrlIrin. Ailrlrar cO I ..a2 I • (' I inu i o ncf- (ri12) 92fi 3308 • MARK s. r rnNSON. r•ns ron July 14, 1988 Dear friends, We would again like to share with you a progress report on plans.to improve our,facilities. We appreciate the suggestions many of.you made at our first meetings with our neighbors.- Now we would like to invite you to come and see the drawings which will be submitted to the City of Edina with our application for a conditional use permit. The conversation with neighbors and members of our facility planning committee will be held at the church on Monday, July 18th at 7:00 p.m. We invite and encourage your participation in that discussion. Edina Community Lutheran Church values our relationship with residents of our community. Throughout our planning process we have sought to preserve a sense of belonging to a residential neighborhood. We look forward to seeing you on July 18th. Cordially, Mark S. Hanson ss BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC, LOCATION a ,5670 660.45 UTILITY SURVEY FOR: gR.- , \'\_, ,_, °;:, ,: f. . „. 28 7� K L 71 e EDINA COMMUNITY z 52.76. W :Z� s 89*58-47- LUTHERAN CHURCH 7- 1--R I-C —1- L'IT IN Ar �L. AIN— IIIALL Z' LLS I Tll .... ...... 16 -060 i 4,11 N no ... . ... ........ I"A ......... ..... . .. ... .... ...... ....... • op N 00 860 "p:7"", LOCATION MAP 17 PROPOSED SITE PLAN is It CUNINGHAM ARCHITECTS Wom Ing Inc. L_1 ENTRAW'E ^i (IUAT] dAYN ' `.1'11110.111 if Fllt �— I� I -- - (Hll■ RIRIFI �� ' �I, ����� /y FI htI.I.IIW VIIIF NAtI (•ARpEN CJI _J� i i _ q "EFTITI 1 -11E'S FAViI ■f 1At FlIW: R1MN1 11Ff IlE IkhM'E I - ' � i1q I DAWN Lff F�L RANF 1ARTIIE% I r I I GNAW EL Q WruARr 'jjIII UPPER LEVEI PLAN , � n q KSIOVATION - wrw LONhf�r- JL�I�J - . VMTN rul� . tL.YYD01' tL4iW111 Curtin lwrD�r r Y . 7 auAn EMTEANte Lla`'MlMETTE 1LA... IL -- ' I 1 LA— tl.LUtlIW NtnaeeT a'urr�r I t'LArtlMW T —y �=_ I I I ;ti Anr L -- U N YEL'NANM'AL ' YeIM L�Mif �, IeNitANCe I - j I _ "AM—ED %EAI E , LOWER LEVEL PLAN, ti rl 0 4 eff a IACL�awa-- I�— rarmrell1crlon. 1 ss 1 _ c f} d I I , LZ I rl NORTH ELEVATION \1 Ir of R Yf II1 I 16- - .. WEST ELEVATION —�f 4 • o H `w I 1 1 \ r I SOUTH ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION x <� u i W u _u t v Q s a; 5 lee `\ • P- - BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHIC LOCATION :` LM�..• Ne9•se'a7•E 6W.45 ( p• UTILITY SURVEY FOR: .-: ,TR o� _._- �,�t.r �-_ �.- _r EDINA COMMUNITY _ LUTHERAN CHURCH See•ser LUT '$. fi aTeFreu «rltl�..• ReTAIryR .D 4 •�\.i . o LOON 5 IMP YEA■ f Wlp i RRp O, EI.lWTRRf AT •M J1 LA� • PI .• o \.. \ , NoI{: AIA, tAMLILtp Nf/tl •.� •,' ,w PR.I \ . twnppu��Dww��iiuryryyi,..-1 NwLWAT HIA SPA•! �rfJ+' ' `' AAQ♦(I) � �•'� - ♦ '�• f PR F.L AA7 LUNL IKr: STIM el. '" •V• `y7��' —��\1� ,•(IAAV NALi. .••11'TIMIEN IULTED . . % ,:.\ �' .\s. \ •w : T' �_ I .• nM•eR nar AJDIED nr olAO E. r COL. _ ;!:� • %v is IL,Y • .. N — '— 00 • W • ,• . \ \�• MD �� I—EL FILL ♦ PLANTER ' .' 11M� .••.' TIM•¢■ •L _ `\� �i ••`V'• �' �• i�v' NA'TIMeER ■AII. -��I- .'..'TIMRCR "I.E. 1'UC. [� \` DEAD - C LAPPED FILTER FARRII f.••`�.-` I \,♦T�_' p I III!_ P tl I.r 1• PERF. MAIN W DAYLIUNT. '• - i (�\ . , RI.TAINI ,i *ALL AEeTIIRI ol Eum LOCATION MAP tiJ \ " PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN • �' CUNINGHAM ARCHITECTS AAtF-" ' jJ j ♦ ! jjlIjjlI y s• IISITE. Lnl JJE�I ' _ ���• � ... .... �.. L,..,,,. ., ..� L. �ry�J9 k•. `� ~•'e' 7/13/88 •�L.e• ". A./B�r �r j.. ,� ^N.....- / ,•N ,' \i I�nndr Land Aur•srvInQ ■n!. f •w+• fen 5—a e,1 ,r,K Agenda Item V.B. 7d A .• J ; r�u l2 �lC6J e G f (IQJ'L�sr 4 ^fOri- /1 ,ax d! �Dnrn aa,( c, ,r �`i47` Z`iCQ Cp .n rN rr r, o ,. l- e c or r►� .,,..� ,. a(� a /�� / C/ Q !�' C /vf1 iK K �i Gym �!IiL�I^�C r� 6A r `% �j(/ .e ` co 'l C C.t r r %s �IeiyA4oriiaeo.( `tar vary CArnvu•1Ar l>7"' f.•- �ttr��,.t 5 " Gr ct Ck"rriL 5'h Se 4P- /,a;, � � 6'�S�Pri L 74w, c ex O" /'j ors .7� a.4 G it Kv ci., 2 DY 46e /7"- c..� 2 4-r -r- n 2 ZC c'r 6 //le s >c itd /� -6Z O m G / 4f C7 e I o e ly REPORT/RECOMMENDATION ..� EC011�111�IE NDATION ITo: Kenneth Rosland From: Craig Larsen Date: August 15, 1988 Subject: P -88 -2, Southdale Expansion and Renovation Agenda Item # v. c. Consent [� Information Only [] Mgr. Recommends To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion [] Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Approve Final Development Plan subject to: 1. Landscaping and Screening Plan acceptable to City Staff. 2. An access - egress plan -for 66th Street., 69th Street and York Avenue including necessary rights of way dedication; acceptable to the City and Hennepin County. The access - egress plan for 69th Street should be coogdinated with the owners of the Galleria block, and should be approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. An easement,to allow vehicles of the City's Transit Authority the right to pass through.the'Center property. Information /Background: The attached plans are the same as those informally presented to the Council on July 18, 1988. DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING HELD ON JULY 27, 1988. MEMBERS PRESENT, G. JOHNSON, H. MCCLELLAND, V. SHAW, J. BAILEY, J. PAULUS, G. WORKINGER. P -88 -2 Southdale Center Expansion The Center. Companies and The.Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States Mr. Larsen presented his staff report and noted the Center Companies, representing Southdale Center have submitted plans for an expansion and renovation of the Center. The expansion is greater than 10% of the existing floor area, a Final Development Plan approval is required. The project would include the construction of a new Dayton's department store containing approximately 340,000 square feet of gross floor area. The existing Dayton's store would be converted to mall space and new tenant space. This conversion would provide approximately 117,000 square feet of new leasable area in the center. In addition, all existing common areas and mall areas would be renovated. Three new, single level parking decks would be added to serve the expanded center. The J.C. Penney and Dayton's Garden Center's would be removed. Southdale is now 32 years old. The proposed expansion is intended to preserve Southdale's competitive position in a changing retail climate. Staff believes it is important to the Community for Southdale to remain strong and healthy. The proposed renovation of the Center will insure that Southdale will continue to be an asset to the Community. Mr. Larsen concluded his staff report recommending approval of the Final Development Plan with the following conditions: 1. Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule to include additional screening of parking and drive aisle. 2. An access egress plan for 66th Street, York Avenue, and 69th Street acceptable to the City and to Hennepin County for 66th Street and York Avenue, to be implemented when adjacent streets are upgraded, and the dedication of additional rights of way to implement the plan.. 3 An easement to allow vehicles of the Southeast Edina Transit authority the right to pass through the Center property. Mr. Chris Hanson, Dennis LaFrance, David Koski, D. Kasell and Douglas McChane representing the Center Companies were present.. Mr. Hanson with graphics explained to the Commission the proposed addition and renovation of Southdale Shopping Center. A discussion ensued with Commission Members expressing enthusiasm for the proposed project. Commissioner G. Johnson raised a question concerning the mode of transportation used to link the proposed developments on the Hedberg site to the general Southdale area. Mr. Larsen said at this time different vehicles are under consideration. One mode of transportation considered is•a vehicle which has the means to regulate the traffic signals. Eileen Supplebaum, resident on West Shore Drive asked Mr. Hanson what security measures would be implemented for the proposed ramps. Mr. Hanson explained that every measure to insure ramp safety will be.implemented. He added lighting and the present Southdale security system of guards patrolling the ramps are two options which will be implemented,to provide ramp security. Commissioner Paulus pointed out with ,proper security measures implemented covered ramps can be a benefit due to the State's extreme weather variations. Commissioner Bailey asked for clarification of entrances and exits to the Center especially the proposed ramps. With the aide of a model Mr. Hanson explained the circulation pattern for the site and the proposed ramps. Commissioner Bailey moved to recommend approval for P -88 -2 subject to staff conditions. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Commissioner G. Johnson abstained. Ayes: McClelland, Bailey, Shaw, Paulus, Workinger. Motion carried. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT JULY 27, 1988 P -88 -2 Southdale Center Expansion The Center Companies and The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States The Center Companies, representing Southdale Center have submitted plans for an expansion and renovation of the Center. Since the expansion is greater than 10% of the existing floor area, a Final Development Plan approval is required. A detailed description of the proposed project has been provided by the Center Companies. The project would include the construction of a new Dayton's department store containing approximately 340,000 square feet of gross floor area. The store would be constructed immediately northwest of the present store. The existing Dayton's store would be converted to mall space and new tenant space. This conversion would provide approximately 117,000 square feet of new leasable area in the center. In addition, all existing common areas and mall areas would be renovated. Three new, single level parking decks would be added to serve the expanded center. The J.C. Penney and Dayton's Garden Center's would be removed. The Southdale Center site contains 3,541,820 square feet or approximately 81 acres. The expanded center would contain 1,353,263 square feet resulting in a Floor Area Ration of 0.38. The PC -3 Commercial District allows a FAR of 0.5. The net addition to the Center is 191,694 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale currently provides 6,527 parking spaces. The construction of the new Daytons store would result in the loss of 437 spaces. The project proposes three new single level parking decks containing a total of 882 spaces. Total parking on site would be increased to 6,974 spaces at completion. Shopping centers are required to provide 5 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Southdale would be providing 5.15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The existing one -way circulation system at the perimeter of the site would be continued with some modifications to improve flow. The proposed expansion will require the relocation of the bus - transit activities from the north to the south side of the center. The Center Companies has been working with MTC staff to assure a smooth transition of service. Also, the Center Companies has agreed in principle to allow the Southeast Edina Transit System to circulate through the center. s� Three of the four perimeter streets around the center are not constructed to urban standards. Staff has suggested that these streets should be upgraded in connection with the Center's expansion. Two of these streets, York and 66th Streets are County roads, 69th Street is a City street. Barton Aschman, traffic consultant for Southdale, has prepared a plan illustrating upgraded streets and modified access to the Center. Along 69th Street, this plan has been coordinated with the owners.of the Calleria block. The timing of these improvements is not known at this time. It will be necessary to gain additional right of way around the Center to accomplish the roadway improvements. This right of way would be 10 to 15 feet and would include a sidewalk easement. The proposed expansion would include a substantial upgrading of the landscaping on the site. The proposed landscaping exceeds that required by the Zoning Ordinance. However,'additional screening is needed for some parking areas along the east and south property lines. Attached to this report is a traffic impact analysis of the proposed expansion prepared by Barton Aschman. Fran Hoffman has reviewed the report and concurs with its findings and conclusions. Recommendation Southdale is now.32 years old. The proposed expansion is intended to preserve Southdale's competitive position in a changing retail climate. We think it is important to the Community for Southdale to remain strong and healthy. The proposed renovation of the Center will insure that Southdale will continue to be an asset to the Community. Staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan with the following conditions: % 1. Staff approval of a landscaping plan and schedule to include additional screening-of parking and drive aisle. 2. An access egress plan for 66th Street, York Avenue, and 69th Street acceptable to the City and to Hennepin County for 66th Street and York Avenue, to be implemented when adjacent streets are upgraded. 3. An easement to allow vehicles of the Southeast Edina Transit authority the right to pass through the Center property. F Y SOUTHDALE CENTER EXPANSION /RENOVATION STL"DY EDINA, MINNESOTA OWNER Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States Equitable Real Estate Investment Management, Inc. 3350 Equitable Building, Suite 3350 401 North Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60611 CENTER MANAGER The Center Companies 111 Third Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 ARCHITECT. Architect=1 Alliance 400 Clifton Avenue South Minneapolis. Minnesota 55403 RETAIL RSA Associates, Inc. CONSULTANTS: 1209 -•N. Calvert Street Baltimore, Maryland 21202 STRUCTURAL Meyer, Bor gman, and Johnson ENGINEERS 810 Plymouth Building 12 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 MECHANICAL/ Michaud, Cooley, Erickson and Associates ELECTRICAL 625 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 1325 ENGINEERS: Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 TRAFFIC /CIVIL/ Barton- Asc -man Associates, Inc. ENVIRONMENTAL 1610 South sixth Street ENGINEERS: MinneapolLr, Minnesota 55454 BUILDING CODE Rolf Jensen and Associates, Inc. CONSULTANTS: 1751 Lake Cook Road Deerfield, I::inois 60015 March 30, 19.88 SOUTHDALE/ROSEDALE EXPANSION ac RENOVATION STUDY SOUTHDALE A. Basic Program: 1. Existing Center area 1,161,569 sq.ft. 2-' Less areas proposed for demolition at: a.) J.C.Penney Garden Center ( -) 7,642 sq.ft. W Dayton Garden Center (-) 21,934 sq.ft. 1,131,993 sq.ft. 3. Less existing Dayton Store ( -) 256,163 sq.ft. 4. Net existing Center before renovation /expansion 875,830 sq.ft. 5. Add new Dayton Store + 340,200 sq.ft. 6. Add new GLA from conversion of Dayton shell + 116,908 sq.ft.* 7. Add new construction GLA + 20,325 , sq.ft. Proposed new GLA ( +) 1,353,263 sq.ft. * Existing Dayton shell building conversion 116,908 sq.ft. GLA " 79,092 sq.ft. CA (including holes in floor) 60,163 sq.ft. existing basement 256,163 sq.ft. existing gross building B. Parking: 1. 6,527 existing spaces 2. ( -)435 projected loss 3. 6,092 spaces net 4. 882 decks aces shown 5. 6,974 spaces shown 5.15 RATIO) * * Includes 150 handicap spaces SOUTHDALE EXPANSION /RENOVATION STUDY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION L INTRODUCTION Dayton Hudson Department Stores Corporation is considering building a new store northwest of its existing store. The existing Dayton's store, except for the basement level, will be taken over by Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and will be converted to general leasable area for additional tenant space. The existing mall area will undergo substantial upgrading to improve the center's ambiance, enhance the shopping experience, and tie into the new mall area in the converted Dayton's store. In addition, significant exterior parking, traffic, and landscaping improvements will be implemented. Within the tenant space in the former Dayton's store, large openings will be cut into the floors in the public areas to form a three level mall with floors inter- connected by escalators. The existing garden court will be extended into the former Dayton's area creating a three -level extension of the mall. Conceptually, the new court space and the existing space is conceived as one continuous garden court space. A new skylight element extending through new and renovated space will emphasize the continuity of the mall areas. Continuing the theme of filtered natural light, the existing large skylight will be reglazed and new skylight elements will be implemented along the mall connecting to J.C. Penney. 2. INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS A. Natural Light A key element in upgrading the center will be replacement of existing and provision of new skylights with translucent panels. A visual tie from the converted Dayton's store to the existing mall area is created by introduction of a continuous skylight. A new skylight will be provided above the mall leading to Penney's court and the existing court skylight will be replaced. B. Ceilings /Artificial Lighting New ceilings, will be provided in the existing mall area and in the converted Dayton's space. The use of indirect cove lighting will be employed extensivelv throughout the center and will be supplemented by recessed downlighting. Ceilings, soffits, and fascias will be detailed to modulate the planes as much as possible. C. Neutral Bands and Piers Provision of neutral bands for signage above storefronts and neutral piers between stores will be made in the converted' Dayton's store. The neutral piers in the existing mall area will be upgraded. D. Floors New tile flooring will be provided in the common areas of the converted Dayton's store and throughout the common areas of the existing mall. E. Stairs /Vertical Circulation The ,two existing stairs in the common mall area will be removed. New stairs will be provided in combination with new cascading escalators. A new elevator will be provided in the central court area. Provisions for emergency exit stairs_ in the converted Dayton's store will be made. At I.C. Penney's court the existing stair will be replaced and escalators connecting the first and second levels of the mall will be installed. F. Railings In order to improve visibility in the mall and to create a- sense of openness, the existing railings will be replaced with structural glass railings with wood handrails. G. Landscaping /Water Features /Furnishings The common areas will be provided with landscaping to take advantage of the natural light. In combination with` new water features and new furnishings, the landscaping will improve the mall area and enhance the shopping experience. A park like atmosphere will be achieved and areas for promotional activities and special exhibits will be created. 3. EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS A. Parking /Traffic One level parking decks will be built northwest and southwest of the new (and existing) Dayton's store and northeast of the existing J.C. Penney's store. The parking decks will be designed to minimize their visual impact on the center. The majority of the existing parking lots will be restriped in order to increase capacity and to accommodate the new parking decks. The earth berm at Donaldson's department store will be relocated to run in an east -west direction in lieu of its current northeast - southwest direction. This change will significantly improve the layout of the parking lot and ease pedestrian access to the store. B. Landscaping Mature landscaping will be provided along the internal loop road to break up the expanse of the parking lots. Landscaping along the new parking decks will be furnished at grade to soften the edge of the deck. ' C. New Entries The existing mall entries will be upgraded and improved to reflect the change inside the mall. New entries will be provided at .both levels southwest of the converted Dayton's store. E. Signage /Graphics - - - -- -The existing site and building signage will be replaced and upgraded to match . the overall mall improvements. TRUCTURAL ANAL Y MS ST MNIARY The proposed architectural concept for the Southdale project has been studied from a structural engineering standpoint and judged to be feasible. The major items investigated in this study include: Conversion of the Dayton's Building to tenant space; enhancement of the Tenant Building including restructuring of the existing floors to accommodate major slab openings and skylights; addition of new exterior parking decks; vertical realignment of the existing Truck tunnel. Preliminary structural design 'solutions have been developed for each proposed modification and are included in the appendix of this report. TRAFFIC AND PARKING ANALYSIS SUNINIARY 1. TRAFFIC STUDY A. Scope The Southdale Center Traffic Study was completed in September 1987. The street system surrounding and serving the Southdale Center was tested for two levels of expansion, one at 75,000 square feet GLA and a high scenario at 420,000 square feet GLA which is more than double the current proposed expansion of the center. Traffic volumes were projected to the year 1992 for the streets and key intersections serving the' Southdale site, extending from 66th Street on the north to 76th Street on the south and France Avenue to York Avenue South. The projected traffic volumes were obtained by utilizing the accepted traffic volume projections for all current and .future development in the area such as the Homart site on France Avenue and I -494, the Hedburg development, the Edinborough residential' development, the National Rental Car development as well as the Southdale Center projected expansion. B. Existing Conditions •A traffic count was conducted on Wednesday, July 29, 1987, of all entry and exit Points to the Southdale Center between the hours of 3:30 and 6:30 P.M.. The results of that traffic count _indicate that entry and exit volumes to the Southdale Center are quite evenly distributed on all four streets around the center. This can be attributed to the excellent interface with the street system that the .Southdale Center has and the high performance of its one -way perimeter road in distributing people to their destination.. - C. Future Traffic Conditions The study concluded that a Southdale Center expansion in excess of 400,000 square feet would not have a major impact on accessibility and traffic operation on the streets surrounding and serving the Southdale Center. The study also concluded that total development in the area between France and York Avenues South extending from I -494 on the south and 66th Street on the north would not impact ,the key streets and intersections serving the Southdale Center to the extent that there. would be hopeless congestion that could not be easily solved. Those deficiencies that are expected to develop can be readily mitigated with conventional, non - expensive street and traffic control improvements. Many..of these street and.traffic control improvements are already being programmed by the City of Edina and Hennepin County. 2. PARKING ANALYSIS AND PROPOSED CENTER RECONFIGURATION A. Existing Parking An inventory of existing parking spaces at the Southdale Center by lot area was conducted on March 22, 1988. , The results of that inventory indicate that there are currently 6,527 existing parking spaces on the Southdale Center site. The parking configuration for the entire site utilizes a 50 to 52 -foot bay width and 8.75 -foot wide stall at an angle of 54 degrees. With the Southdale Center currently existing at a size of 1,161,569 GLA, the existing parking ratio is approximately 5.6 spaces per 1,000 square feet GLA. B. Proposed Southdale Center Parking Reconfiguration and Improvements In preparing for a Dayton's expansion to a new facility and general rehabilitation of the entire mall area, the following improvements are planned: - New parking deck with 349 spaces on the southwest side of Dayton's. - New parking deck on the northwest side of Dayton's with 317 spaces. Removal of Dayton's and Penney's Garden Centers. 0 1 1 1. .Conversion of parking on west side to a 56 -foot bay with 75 degree parking angle. - Relocation of transit from north side to south side of the center. Conversion of parking on north side to 56 -foot bay with th 75 degree parking - Construction of a new deck of 277 spaces on the northeast side of Penney's. - Conversion of Penney's area parking to 56 -foot bay with a 70 degree parking angle. - - Realignment of perimeter road to outside of existing TBA on northeast side. - Relocation of Donaldson's embankment to an easterly position creating more lower level space oriented to Donaldson's. - Reconfiguration of Donaldson's south side parking to 56 -foot bay with a 75 degree parking angle on a north -south access. C. Future Parking The combination of adding parking decks plus reconfiguring the parking to a 56- foot bay at a 75 degree parking angle will result in a net increase of 447 spaces for the Southdale Center resulting in a parking ratio of .approximately 5.1 spaces per 1,000 GLA. The general parking reconfiguration will allow for significant additional landscape treatment to the entire Southdale parking area and the new parking deck additions. The new parking decks and parking reconfiguration will improve orientation of prime parking spaces to the major retail anchors. ENViRONN1ENTAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS SUM1TNTARY Modifications to the existing well field at the center were investigated to identify Permits and other constraints. It was determined that any of the existing wells could be abandoned and relocated with very little regulatory difficulty. This assumes that the quantities of water withdrawn and the depths of relocated wells remain approximately the same as in the existing permits. Other potential environmental requirements for expansion of Southdale Center are: I ) preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), and 2.) application for an Indirect Source Permit (ISP). The project does not equal or exceed mandatory thresholds for these documents. The basis for this is the substantial reuse of space (256,163 sq. ft.) within the Dayton's Department Store building shell rather than the creation of entirely new space. Also, soine existing buildings (29,576 sq. I'[.) will be demolished. The net result is that there will be only '70,786 sq. ft. of new gross floor space upon completion. This is less than the 300,000 square foot threshold. A large component of the proposed ramp parking will be replacement spaces for those removed for the expansion.. Thus, these spaces are not new and do not count towards the EAW and ISP thresholds either. The expansion project will generate only 445 new. spaces, which does not exceed either the 500 -space ISP threshold or the 1,000 -space EAW threshold. As is always the case, local government and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agencv have substantial discretionary authority and may place review requirements on any project to determine if it has the potential for significant environmental effects. CIVTL ENGTNEERING ANALYSIS SUNIN, RY Where construction of the proposed parking decks or the Dayton's expansion will conflict with existing utilities, those utilities will be relocated to a 50 -foot wide utility corridor between the proposed decks and the Southdale Center buildings. Acceptable horizontal and vertical clearances will be maintained between relocated utility lines. Utility service connections to the center will be maintained with additional service connections provided to the Dayton's expansion. Excavation work will be required for the expansion of Donaldson's lower level parking lot and for the construction of the lower level of the northwest Dayton's deck. SOTLS ANALYSTS SUl`7111ARY Based on our preliminary foundation review, it is our judgment the proposed Dayton's addition can be supported on a spread footing foundation system. The foundations should be extended through any existing fill to the underlying coarse alluvial sand. It is our judgment foundations supported on the natural sands can be proportioned for an allowable bearing pressure of up to 5,000 This should result in a factor of safety of at least three again t localized shear failure. The soft clayey sand glacial till soils encountered between depths of 27' and 33' of boring 7 will result in some settlement to the building foundation. Laboratory tests are currently in progress to aid in determining magnitudes of potential: settlement. Based on our preliminary estimates, it is our judgment foundation designed for an allowable bearing. pressure of 5,000 psf and supported on natural sands above elevation 868' should undergo total and differential settlement of less than I" and 1/2 ", respectively. In the portion of the building area that will have a basement level, we recommend the allowable bearing pressure be limited to 4,000 psf to reduce potential settlement of the soft clayev sand layer. By utilizing this lower soil bearing pressure at and below elevation 868', it judgment total and differential. settlement should b is our e less than l" and 1/2 ", respectively. .r • �, f . rs�cty, n' _ -ter .Y ..-,, ,f 0 �. tip-' - NOW Y" L •aV .....- lj�.ry. .M ��' •,� �, t�l' r .' f���, if a w�a /h: --- ,VN n/---- �a I LA ° M11111 192m, '��ryrymitt�yy 1 Dim NNIML2 VAN IMMINIONFAMIE, '1miRs�Im °u ® � E®EM � KIN R ems o fIIIIIIIIIII1g @��l? o 11111111r, F! i� ®!Z00I ° .6-IMc—Lil ai �� ®e— Ii.itlir��i 8 ®111116 ?ro IMMLl ® 1 ®�1IOJII-7 1100 m ,I • ............. low si, 2-9 3 Rl ii F. KU OEM L.1 Amemdo'm PP-07- 7m LE IS cozallm -.2 M191-2. 111flaffiNg"M BEIM 1 1 ® � � M Offimim-immmuz "-Yugo ziW �Ituii�cn.:vw� J C"b — Ib W a .r r of I �t�IQ3�lifa.ftts� ROME m t,x vl 4 �u' �GIM�■■■il ■ ■1l�I� o =� . MONF-IMEJURVE-00-1111IM; ME i�a� ■ ■F ==1 i " ! ■psi■ o coma DIMBROM, mc",�Fommvm no EVEN proWwrompum Rift", Iffaffamomp ut, . . .. ....... "42, �k 80 24 It i® ll K Ir m ZOM Jzz 112, FAIN, irmilvil6fwil la; .. ' / '.1:. A''� 111 A, Vim Pow WX ♦L IMF- WC mm a IRS On ME gar/ lot's Oro 2 L ?;AAA I mftftm' me, it top$ 1.. �� IC• �� � � _ �.:1 ��.� ,'��1- .��y.•/ - .� � I� I����I�II��tI� Ili �.� a p, ftmm- IJ P Ing ill -_AP P Jhl I ',,rte,, !L. IF' i -q Ak PW 1 I All MOM: t v P't Rill! t tm-i ^ � / h OAM '+ �~~ �^~ if L MA MY10H ---------------------- -1] GAPO M som AOM► SOUTHEAST ELEVATION Architectural Alliance ''°"a T'"' chat SOUTHDALE EXPANSION STUDY F d•.M No. I� I rl I � SOUTHDALE EXPANSION STUDY I I I I _ -- - - - -• o....wy qo. ams..,M,. WJ SECTION AT BRIDGE SECTION AT UP RAMPS A L•�► SO"""'R°"YO� SOUTHDALE EXPANSION STUDY SECTION AT RAMP FACE PARKING RAMP SECTIONS MirA ■ I I SECTION LOOKING NORTHWEST owe Con SOUTHDALE EXPANSION STUDY e - a-MA-17e;w guying detail tree planting shrub planting :=D Landscape Notes: Legend Plant Material i )7 - 9A= is Oartan- Aschmen A&socWt", kjr- .... ... . .. N SCAPEPLAN 0 T 0 naTmaume"T my Tm2 =sxmrmas�vAu --------- Soo "" An" MOPOSIO OVmTOAT no PROPOMVMO[AITMWTM momsto fvEROR[VI TPU "Oposm MwoS= SUSOHN KA.TMS 61 Ww. WEST 88TH STREET )7 - 9A= is Oartan- Aschmen A&socWt", kjr- .... ... . .. N SCAPEPLAN ■fM b.r lWl.i. • ' I ' I I W N?M/T n.ILJ ' Barton- A•Nrtian Assodat", bw- ' WEST 66TH STREET r I ° grteka a 1 Nt /b��e w1 / QZ' I 1'1sMRW nys - — �wr� elrp .J ;t _M 6 r _ . • .� �.IV'Yf Yla. • 9 rvcrn rw • n+ OOOO J.C.PENNEY _ �'^• °•• LANDSCAM PLAN On 4 *u ra o o m rtn !Q� e..r � .A •2 8 I (I . o Ll- xy -lA Ilk Flu 10 ViN .1 14 OEM ` DAYTONS EXPANSION LU 9u-MT A!W WEST 69TH STREET LANDSCAPI! PLAN ` 0 Arteka 2 , 1. Land Planners'* Landscape Architects 0 Contractors Arteka • 5800 Baker Road • Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 • (612) 938.9000 1tc�G �r�tcc s*nxmz S.C.. JULY 13,.1988 * Overstory 233 * Understory 53 * Evergreen 89 Sub Zhtal 375 Relocated Existing Trees * Overstory 38 *' Understory 7 * Evergreen 19 Sub Zhtal 64 Dustuxi Trees .7b Remain * Overstory 123 * Understory 20 * Evergreen 71 Sub Total 214 _ Total Trees 653 Note:- Site perimeter = 7400 lin. ft. = 185 overstory trees required, 40 Arteka • 5800 Baker Road • Minnetonka, Minnesota 55345 • (612) 938.9000 , t TRAFFIC FOR a s I U 0 Y °SOUtNDALE CENTER El Q BARTON-AS6NMAN July ASSOCIATES, INC. 6'0z0:0 4(�W-y v i.j� M � � Edina, Minnesota Prepared by: Bartow - scbma*± Associates, mac. Jt]ly 1988 G: • T r • BLqe EXISTIM CONDITIONS 2 TRAFFIC IlMPACI'S OF THE PROPOSED EEVIIDEME Tr 8. PARKIM; AC= AND CIRCJIA' ON 27 CONCLUSIONS 31 APPENDIX C: INaFS a • ANALYSIS EXPANSION APPENDIX E•.. a • r TRAFFIC SITE EXPANSION AND FULL BEDBERG DEVEMPMENT APPENDIX INTERS=ION ANALYSIS ERIVEWAYS ON u AVENUE .. �1 OF FIGUIRES. Paae 1 Site location 3 2 Existing Regional Average Annual Daily Traffic 5. 3 1987 Existing .P.M. Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes 6 4 Proposed Site Plan 9 5 1987 P.M. Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes Entering and-leaving 10 Southdale Center 6 Distribution of Development Traffic 12 7 1992 P.M. Peak-Hour Traffic Volumes Entering and leaving 13 Soutbda a Center 8 Traffic Generators Around Southdale 15 9 1992 P.M. Peak -Hour Background. Traffic 21 10 1992 P.M. Peak -Hour Traffic Plus Full Southdale Expansion 23 it 1992 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Plus FUll Southdale and Hedberg 24 Traffic 12 Existing Parking layout 28 13 Prcpwed Parking layout 29 t LIB OF Paae - -Table 1: Intersection Performance:. 1987 Existing Traffic 7 Table 2: Level of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections 16 Table 3: -1992 Level of Service (P.M. Peak Hour) 18 Ex; --t; ng Intersections Table 4: 1992 Intersection Delay P.M. Peak Hour: 19 Average - Seconds Per Vehicle Existing Intersections Table 5: 1992 Intersection V/C Ratio: Critical 20 Conflicting Movements P.M. Peak Hour Existing Intersections Table 6: 1992 Levels of Service After Mitigation 26 Mea mres (P.M. Peak Hour) A] Mie Center Ompanies are proposing to expand the retail facilities at the Southdale Center in Fdina, Minnesota. The existing development consists of 1,161,569 square feet of GIA. The expansion would take place with construction co mmencing in 1988 to be ccupleted by 1991. Zhe expansion would consist of 191,694 square feet GIA of retail, bringing the total to 1,353,263. Ba n-Asctzman Associates, Inc. was retained to conduct a traffic analysis and access study to determine the inpact of the traffic generated by the proposed expansion on the existing street and intersection system in the vicinity of the site. Specific study objectives were: 1. To determine the capacity condition of the existing street and intersection system in the vicinity of the site. 2. To project the volume, of additional traffic that would be generated by the proposed expansion and to assign it to the surrounding street and intersection system. 3. To determine the capacity condition of the street and intersection system resulting from the addition of traffic generated by the proposed expansion.. 4. Zb recommend any mitigative measures required to alleviate projected capacity deficiencies. y� 5. Zb produce a traffic analysis study that can be used as a basis for any further environmental documentation required. . H Site location and EzigU q Development Tine site occupies the block bounded by France Avenue South, West 66th Street, York Avenue South and 69th Street West, as shown on Figure 1. The existing development cceprises three major department stores and retail facilities meting to a total of 1,161,569 square feet GIA. In addition, apprmdmately 6,300 parking spaces are currently available. Road Network The site is surrounded by an excellent system of highways. 7H 169 /100 runs in a north -south direction just over one mile west. of the site. I -35W is located just over one mile to the east of the site. The Crosstown Highway (C=ity Road 62) is located less than a quarter of a mile to the north of the site. I -494 is located one and one - quarter miles south of the site. In addition to this freeway grid, there is a supporting system of high capacity roads. On- the western boundary of the site, France Avenue provides connections to the Crosstown Highway in the north and I -494 in the south. In the vicinity of the site, France Avenue is a six -lane divided road with left -turn slots and right -turn lanes. Further south, it is a four -lane divided road with left -turn slots. On the eastern boundary of the site, York Avenue provides connections to the Crosstown Highway in the north, via Xerxes Avenue, and in the south it provides a connection to I -494, also via Xerxes Avenue. Along the northern boundary of the site, West 66th Street provides an east - west connection between I -35W in the east and Valley View Road, west of France Avenue. Between Valley View Road, west of France Avenue, and York Avenue, West 66th Street is a four -lane divided road with left -turn slots at the intersections. East of the site, West 66th Street is currently a four - lane road and is under construction improvements to provide a median island and intersection improvements. South of the site, West 69th Street connects Valley View Road with France Avenue and York Avenue. Valley View Road is a roadway paralleling France'Aven ue one block to the west. The roadway intersects France Avenue at 69th Street and runs north - south to a half diamond interchange at the Crosstown Highway, serving vehicles traveling to and fran the west on the Crosstown. Valley View Road is free flowing. It provides an excellent alternative to France Avenue for traffic using the Crosstown Highway to or fran Southdale Center. The fact that it connects with both 66th Street and 69th Street makes it especially convenient to serve Southdale Centex. If rising volumes cause delays on France Avenue significant diversions onto Valley View Road will occur. 2 MO.-- .... Prlmry Access Streets Site Location NBarton -Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure I The original Southdale Center plan provided Valley View Road and 66th Street as parallel and alternate routes .to France Avenue and the 62nd Street Crosstown Highway, respectively. Sufficient capacity is available on Valley View Road and 66th Street to continue providing effective parallel access. West 66th Street has recently been reconstructed between York Avenue and I- 35W. The previous four -lane undivided road was upgraded to a four -lane divided road with a central median island. Left -turn slots were provided at key intersections. Of particular importance to the So uthdale Center are the double left -turn lanes for westbourxi traffic on West 66th Street turning _ south into York Avenue. Facilitating the left turn in to York Avenue improves the capacity of West 66th Street and York Avenue to serve the site. Traffic Flows Figure 2 shows the average daily traffic (ADr) volumes on roads in the vicinity of the site. Volumes for 1986 were obtained from the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Volumes relating to 1985 were obtained from the City of Edina. Key intersections likely to be impacted by the proposed development were identified and 1987 peak -hour traffic volumes for these intersections were assembled and are shown in Figure 3. The key intersections identified were: I. France Avenue and West 66th Street 2. France Avenue and West 69th Street 3. France Avenue and West 70th Street 4. France Avenue and West 76th Street 5. York Avenue and West 66th Street 6. York Avenue and West 69th Street 7. York Avenue and West 70th Street S. York Avenue and West 76th Street The P.M. peak -hour traffic counts assembled had been conducted by the City of Edina. Counts were not undertaken at the intersections of West .66th Street with York Avenue and with France Avenue because of the unrepresentative conditions existing at present as a result of the construction activities associated with the improvements to West 66th Street. Traffic volumes representing the best estimate of the 1987 situation were derived from earlier counts, projected to 1987 for the intersections of France Avenue and York Avenue with West 66th Street. Intersection Perfonnanoe Using the Barton - Aschman computer program SIGNAL85 /TEAPAC, a capacity analysis and evaluation of intersection performance was conducted on each of the key intersections affected by the site for the existing traffic volumes. The analysis included an estimate of the level of service for the 4 NORTk NOT TO SCALE SOURCE: (000) 1986 MNDOT TRAFFIC FLOW MAPS Regional Average Annual Dally Traffic' 000 1985 MUNICIPAL STATE AID HIGHWAY MAPS O Barton- Aschman Aa. ; !fates, Inc. Figure 2 wino ^ N �-w O h w m �wem NA. —458 6 �� -216 jj� ~ -369 W 88TH ST ' ��r 260 89 137 —� 1 J82 401 139 moan emu. ee n em 00 lgmQ a° SOUTHDALE W SHOPPING NORTH CENTER Y Not to Scale W J J s oe�n �Np O N 'mm 117 93 �--- 189 I �— 172 1 189 1 57 1 W 69TH ST 320 I� 274 —tr 120 218 11 w m p tee' N ^N p NmA W 70TH ST N ON A Nt7 00^ p m 108 40 �— 241 99 123 � � 73 18 2 11 375 I 294 —� 126 noe 164 poem Np^ Am0 cc W o e wpm IpNN 61 6 69 I 1 W W � U Q 2 Y 19 7 Q s O L e e+p^ App o e wpm IpNN 61 6 69 I 1 I� 275 1 44 - f' W 76TH ST 19 7 174 669 -10 -♦ 301 I 144 of 10 t7 mmo 1� � p lope 1987 Existing P.M. Peak . Hour Traffic Volumes OBarton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 3 intersection as a whole and the degree of saturation on of the traffic movements analysis appear in Appendix for each of the traffic movements. In addition, the intersection as a whole as well as on each was calculated. Details of: the intersection A. Table 1 summarizes the overall level of service and overall degree of saturation at the intersections analyzed using the 1987 existing traffic volumes. v` if 1 26WMON •' 71' • •. ►• M EDUSTIM MAFFIC VOILNES Overall overall Level of Degree of Location Service Saturation France Avenue/West 66th Street D* 0.61 France Avenue/West 69th Street D* 0.63 France Avenue/West 70th Street D+ 0.74 France Avenue/West 76th Street F 1.06 York Avenue/West 66th Street D 0.77 York Avenue/West 69th Street D+• 0.66 York Avenue/West 70th Street C+ � 0..62 York Avenue/West 76th Street D+ 0.57 Most intersections are exhibiting satisfactory performance at present. A notable exception is the intersection of France Avenue and West 76th Street. his intersection has a current level of service of F. West 76th Street is carrying hick volumes of eastbound traffic in the afternoon peak hour. These high thr Ugh volumes can be traced east to I -35W. It appears that West 76th Street is functioning as an alternative route to relieve I -494. At France Avenue, West 76th Street is a four -lane two -way road without a median ,island and without left -turn slots or right -turn lanes. The situation is complicated by a high volume of left- turning traffic from the western approach of West 76th Street turning north on France Avenue. M is intersection needs improvement to handle current traffic. Flight- of-way width is adequate and it would be a relatively simple matter to widen West 76th Street to incorporate left -turn slot lanes on the approaches to France Avenue. Right -turn lanes could also be added to reduce the amount of green time needed for West 76th Street. nv-- analysis. indicated that the intersection'of France Avenue and West 69th Street is operating at Level of Service D. Scrutiny of the analysis shows that it is only the left -turn movement from the west approach that has a Level of Service D. Other movements operate at higher levels of service. 7 TRAFFIC noAL'1'B 00 THE PROPOSED DEVF.IDPNM The Proposed Development The proposed development is an expansion of the existing retail facilities at the '- Saki dale Center. Figure 4 shows the proposed site plan. 'Ihe expansion will consist of: A. Building Areas: 1 New Department Store + 340,200 square feet 2 . New CIA frcen Department Store Conversion + 116,908 square feet 3. New Construction GIA + 20,325 square feet 4. Total Additional GIA 477,433 square feet 5. 1 Areas Proposed for Demolition - 29,576 square feet 6. Tess bclsting Department Store - 256,163 square feet 7. . Total Deleted GLA - 285,739 square feet 8. Proposed Additional GIA + 191,697 square feet 9• Proposed Total GIA 1,353,263 square feet B. Parking 1. Ed-sting Spaces 6,527 2. Projected lass - 437 3. Net Spaces 6,090 4. Proposed Parking Deck + 882 5. Total Spaces (5.15 Ratio) 6,972 6. New Spaces Gained 445 Traffic Generation 7b determine the. existing traffic generation rate of the center, traffic counts were conducted at all the entrance and exit points serving the Southdale Center during the afternoon peak period on Wednesday, July 29, 1987. Figure 5 shows the traffic volumes at each entrance and exit point. Counts at the surrourcUng intersections had indicated that the peak hour for traffic on the street system was 4:45 to 5:45 P.M.. The traffic generation of the site during this period was determined from the counts. The P.M. peak -hair traffic trips generated by the site were: .Trips Out: 1,808 vehicles per hour Trips In: 1,635 vehicles per hour 8 -- - - -- WtST 66th ST U.. 1 _ \ I + X I / J.C. PENNEY r/ ' DAYMys i EXPANSION \ • � � ` r n;o x,\ DAYTON DONALDSOris rt I Lj rte/ .•:"° : ` _' i t V i k l � � i x► ► g\ O ,,� \ 1J — - -' L ---_ -- WEST 691h ST O Berton— Aschmen Associates, Existing Traffic Signet - -i Transit Route Site Plan Proposed Southdale Center Expansion Figure 4 1� D 2 0 1© Q w a w U IZ LL W 66TH ST 11 / 4 I IO I© 0 n 1 9 Q 3 V IO 0 NORTH NOT TO SCALE /10 O 4 Y 249 Er O y m' M m - -- C_W 69TH ST� ,i O Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. 1987 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Entering and Leaving Southdale Center Figure 5 The existing develoaoent consists of 1,161, 569 square feet GIA of retail facilities. The resulting trip generation rate observed for the site was thus: Trip Rate Out: 1.56 vehicles per hour per 1,000 square feet GIA Trip_Rate In: 1.41 vehicles per hour per 1,000 square feet GIA Applying these rates to the proposed total expansion of 191,694 square feet . GIA produced the following increase in trips generated for the center: Trips Out: 299 Trips In: 270 Total Trips: 569 Traffic Distribution and Assignment Traffic direction of approach and departure was based on the population distribution within a five -mile radius of the Southdale Centex. 'Ibis radius was chosen having regard to carpeting centers, the CBD' location and the river barriers. meeting centers cotprising Eden Prairie center to the southwest, Ridgedale to the northwest, Minneapolis CBD to the northeast and Burnsville Center to the southeast world reduce the influence of population beyond the five -mile boundary. rib assess the trip distribution, the population in each traffic assigrment zone (TAZ) of the Metropolitan Council's forecast model was recorded for the base year and year 2000. The population was interpolated to determine the 1992 population. Traffic from each TAZ was then assigned to a highway or street serving that area. The assignment obtained in this manner was then coupared with the volumes by direction of approach obtained frcan the traffic count at the entrance and exit points of Southdale. The assignment was then modified to reconcile the initial theoretical assignment with observed traffic entering the Southdale Centex. Figure 6 shows the overall distribution by direction of approach of the development's project traffic. Figure 7 snows the resulting projected 1992 P.M. peak hour traffic volumes entering and exiting the Southdale Center. Scenarios Analyzed for Traffic �mnct A. 1992 Background Traffic Without the Expansion B. Southdale Expansion C. Expansion of Southdale and Full Develcpnent of Hedberg Zhe details of these scenarios follow. A. 1992 Bac m and Traffic BacJagrrnmd traffic volumes in 1992, which are the volumes in 1992 without the proposed develognent, were projected by applying a cni" �tt- per —annum growth to the 1987 traffic volumes and then adding to that the traffic flows that would be generated. by approved develcpTent of projects in the vicinity 11 Distribution of Development Traffic OBarton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure ,6 72 t W 66TH ST 37 35 69 172 U 62 0 70 M Ui Z SOUTHDALE z SHOPPING Q U. CENTER 3 M 305 M 184 9 4� W 69TH ST 260 Lo 37 ---------- LNORTH NOT TO SCALE U Barton-Asclwnan Associates, Inc. 1992 P.M. Peak Hour.Traffic Volumes Entering and Leaving' Southdale Center Figure 7 of the site._ Traffic generation Was added for the following developments whose locations are shown in Figure 8: 1. Homart (which was not occupied at the time of the traffic counts) 6,075 GSF office, 25,000 GSF retail and 164 hotel roosts. 2. Fdinboraxlh multi. -Use Develojanent: Only 15 percent of the 213,400 GSF office was occupied at the time of the count. Traffic was added for the 181,000 GSF office that was still to be occupied. Ninety percent of the elderly housing was unooaipied at the time of the study. Therefore, traffic from 184 dwelling units was added. Nearly 40 percent of the 392 dwelling units of condominiums was occupied during the time of the study. Traffic was added for the remaining 235 dwelling units. - 3. Northland Plaza: traffic was added for 210,000 GSF office, not yet built. 4. National Car Rental: 107,000 GSF office was added. B. Southdale Canter ExDansion For this scenario, the traffic generated by 191,694 GIA retail constituting the expansion of Southdale Center was added to the 1992 background traffic. C. E=ansion of Southdale and Full Development of $edbercr In this scenario the background traffic was. assumed to be the 1992 background traffic from the first scenario together with expansion of Southdale.:., To this new background traffic, the traffic generated by the full Hedberg develcpwz t, under consideration in a study being carried out for the City of Edina, was added. Full development for the Hedberg site was considered as: Office Retail Health Club Residential .(Condominium) Hotel Criteria for Level of Service and Capacity 1,500,000 GSF 176,500 GSF 150,000 GSF 1,500 Dwelling Units 250 Rooms Key intersections in the vicinity of the site were analyzed for traffic capacity conditions and levels of service. Explanations of these terms follow. Capacity conditions of an intersection are indicated by the ratio of the volume of traffic to the capacity of the intersection to carry traffic. This is known as.the V/C ratio. 14 v r i a 5E• C t f C .,E _. L I rk�_4 +; • G NI wIND RD. tf v••n _• t4 •' wi Z w Sgtn. ST. a w v Se , e = c• S . 5P•. St • w• • • r . ift n ST z M 59 z a S. ? ` 7 - ! a z Ir a `� O N W V 3 N • W Z > '7 } a O ; = w`, n_, a i ! QO v 9 K ¢ 6� •� J C W �� •�J boo i } C N z J a< F Z _ a = • C • I Z 51 c W X. _ •qG v•(r i _�' (w Q Z O • • O 62no ST S* • f a a z o v °•5 t 4 i � a 5t N _ •' _ a Z ME. •h �. 71 J' • ; W +' V = > y > � E • �� d > r o• as i ` W p a i — 651. ST ' w E S' 0: a :1 ogle` 31 " m T • —_ - - 5j 66th o W m S w S w E E •. d c' a ° = L•Oine %O-�� _ f bf v+ N u5 .n •n ,n u+ In . Ir N vl �' a r Southdale 67.• 5 w" o es, [ C40 4•rAK2 G e _ Center }_ F -� K 681n 5' o C,`r`�• vv' o , o d S' w E9 i i 695+ V y6F4o T N C p c i s vi > i s a J > W W W W > W Q Q • c w. 701n a r T> a a e c W e a a > a a a �F. W •w DOv(v •.� r4r .� D9 a c \j0 29 N 701/2 S- v Oa L �1 j[ T [e Ngi4w 71S• St h ,r44 a Z a M42 i ;TDh ti rQ GRO Z w 711 2 2 • W > Q _> .•, •1''t• <�` a 4 Y 72-0 5' r \ \ rAve ; �Gf�t p�° i z It pR. L t w •3• V ' \ s Z 7 W J I. \ r•A ° � ST 'lL r7p[ DR Q :3 0 -A O 74 '^ m16' S =uS PAa.:OM 4 RiCHF IELG C O 1970 POP a:23 i evF. Cv g" m � Z Z C) n a W. z 75 1n d - ` 7 > vv G A D :0 -t y a c 197c; PpF 44,C)4 E, Na�t+ional Z w 77th •5T Car w J71to SL : Rental > w 1r lh c. v tY'MM M N N 4N41 a �a X0` H2' omart orthwestern p Financial Center Q2 a - K 78th g7 a e0tn 5T u G• r. vi a a a a In 1^ N ;4 �J m Northland w a1.• sT. W Plaza W Q Q b iSM� > _ Traffic Generators around Southdale Center L.1 Barton- Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 8 A V/C ratio of 1.00 indicates that the intersection is operating at the full extent of its capacity. Ratios of V/C above 1.00 indicate greater volumes of demand than the intersection can handle. Likewise, ratios below 1.00 indicate that there is reserve capacity. Level of -Service Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and lost travel time. Specifically, level of service criteria are stated in terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for the peak 15- minute analysis period. The criteria are given in Table 2. v Stopped Delay per Vehicle Level of Service (sec) A < 5.0 B 5.1 to 15.0 C 15.1 to 25.0 D 25.1 to 40.0 E 40.1 to 60.0 F > 60.0 Level of Service A describes operations with very low delay, i.e., less than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. This occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. Level of Service B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. This generally occurs with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. level of Service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progressicn and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stepping is significant at this level, although many still pass through the intersection without stopping. level of Service D describes operations with delay"i.n the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths or high V/C ratios. Many 16 vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not Individual cycle failures are noticeable. stopping declines. Level of Service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Meese high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent Level of Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. This condition often occurs with oversaturation, i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high V/C ratios below 1.00 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and long cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Oam a lson of Traffic IbQacts For each of the three scenarios the traffic traveling to and frcen each of the generators was distributed and assigned to the road network. From the assignments the traffic movements through each of the key intersections was estimated for each scenario. Using Barton- Aschman's SIGNA185 computer program for analyzing intersections, the key intersections were analyzed for each scenario. to determine the intersection performance measures. The principal indicators of performance, namely level..of service, vehicle delay and V/C ratio are summarized in the following tables. Table 3 records the 1992 level of service of" the P.M. peak hour for each of the scenarios assuming that the intersections and their signal arrwyJements remained as they, were in 1987 except for the completion of the current road improvements to 66th Avenue. Table 4 follows and records the estimated average vehicle delay at the existing intersections for the five scenarios. This is followed by Table 5 which shows the estimated V/C ratio for the critical conflicting movements of the key intersections for the five scenarios, assLmiing, as before, the existing intersection. A. 1992 Background Traffic Figure 9 shows the traffic volumes for this scenario. Table 3 shows that the intersections will be operating at Level of Service C or D with the exception of France and 76th which would be operating at level of Service F. This intersection is already suffering from lengthy delays, particularly on the south approach. Seventy -sixth Avenue is carrying quite a large volume of eastbound traffic. Probably mxh of this traffic is using 76th Avenue as an alternative to I -494. There is a substantial left- turning movement from west to north and 76th Avenue does not have provision for a left- turning slot, nor is there a protected left -turn phase. Analysis of the various scenarios indicated that Southdale expansions would have a greater effect on 66th Avenue and 69th Avenue intersections because 17 TABLE 3 1992 LEVEL OF SERVICE (P.M. EXISTIM INTERSECITONS - - 1992 Aril - Badmjround Southdale Southdale Intersection Traffic Expansion Expansion Franoe /66th D+ D+. D F wioe /69th D+- D+ D Ftm-i a /70th D+ D F Franoe /76th F F F York/66th D E+ E York/69th D+- D E+ York/70th C+ C+ C ` York/76th D+ D+ F 18 TABLE 4 1992 INTERSECTION DELAY P.M. PEAK HOUR: AVERAGE SDOCNDS PER VEHICLE EXISTING II TERS=ONS 1992 He&er'9 And Badmjround Southdale Southdale Intersection Traffic Expansion Expansion France /66th 26.8 28.9 28.5 France /69th 25.7 30.3 33.9 France /70th 28.4 35.8 62.9 France /76th 109.1 110.7 132.8 York/66th 38.0 47.8 50.2 York/69th 31.8 33.7 41.1 Yor)V70th 17.7 17.6 20.7 York/76th 30.7 29.7 74.1 19 TABLE 5 1992 IRIERSECTION V/C RATIO: CRITICAL CWMCTING I YMERIS P.M. PEAK HOUR FXI STIM 331ITF6ECTIONS Intersection 1992 Badmjround Traffic Socthdale Expansion And Southdale . Expansion France /66th 0.75 0.91 0.92 Franoe /69th 0.75 0.93 0.97 Franoe /70th 0.89 0.97 1.16 France /76th 1.55 1.59 1.88 York/66th 0.94 1.05 1.07 York/69th 0.83 0.93 0.94 York/7Oth 0.87 0.87 0.93 York/76th 0.86 0.87 1.92 A 20 O mm� mm �0N Nm� 286 1 �z3o �1� ---392 W 66TH ST 273 94 144 346 422 148 ma omm lV m el In l9 c.0 SOUTHDALE SHOPPING W NORTH > CENTER Not to Scene W J > omm Oom ul�-m mom �N 123 m �98 ♦- 199 181 1 205 64 W 69TH ST 4L 81 t 141 33 6 J I r 288 -� 147 147 � 233 AN In NmA mmm 190m ON N01 W 70TH ST m v, e01 NAN �O^ • om� _ 114 42, 04 I �, 132 I`--► 132 1 at 114 1 222 4-1 394 -10 I r 309 - 0 I r n 134 Okn a 172 ----n mWN c4 O mmA ^chN W L lu W U Q 2 Y ¢ p L > m gel. N A mNh ^�^ mN ♦ 94 l 289 4L e}- 154 S-- 207 115 53 W 76TH ST 207 188 318 --♦ r 204 --� r 'Inn �O �N 1992 P.M. Peak Hour Background Traffic OBarton - Aschman Associates, Inc. Figure 9 much of the traffic was oriented to the Crosstown Highway (County Road 62). The Hedberg traffic would have less impact on those northern intersections, as it would be oriented more toward I- 494. Thus the intersection of France and 76th Avenue is more affected by Hedberg than by Southdale. B. Southdale E pansion. Figure 10 shows the traffic volumes for this scenario. -As shown in Table 3, the Southdale expansion would not charge the levels of service of the four intersections studied on `France — namely 66th, 69th, 70th and 76th. Delays would not be significantly increased, as shown in Table 4. The expansion would have a moderate impact on the three intersections on France Avenue, namely 66th, 69th and 70th, but would not exceed the capacity of the intersections, .as shown in Table 5. Franoe /76th would remain overloaded with a slight increase in V/C ratio. The York Avenue intersections would experience a greater impact than the France Avenue intersections. York and 66th would have some of the movements brit up to beyond capacity and the overall level of service of the intersection would change fza D to E. York and 69th would not change its level of service. York and 70th would remain at Level of service C and York and 76th Avenue would remain at Level of Service D. C. Expansion and Full Development of Hedberg Figure it shows the traffic volumes associated with this scenario. The intersections of France and 66th and France and 69th would remain at Level of Service D, delay would remain tolerable and the intersections would be operating within their limits of capacity. France and 70th would change from Level of Service D with the full Scuthdale expansion to Level of Service F if the full Hedberg expansion were added. France and 76th would remain at level of Service F. The intersection of York and 66th Avenue would remain at level of Service E. Table 5 snows that the addition of Hedberg over and above Southdale would also take the volume of traffic beyond the capacity of the intersection. York/69th would to change from Level of Service D with the full Southdale expansion to a level of Service E if Hedberg were added. The V/C ratios would not exceed 1.00. York and 70th would remain at Level of Service C and delays would be quite acceptable. York and 76th would change frcen , Level of Service D to F and the V/C ratio would exceed 1.00. 22 am � A A SON * I� 299 - �� / -- -600 251 s4 �1r 397 147 A A O mNm Nm� NO • NOII� W 86TH ST 535 398 307 - -� —� 154 1 440 mdA O m N n0 SOUTHD ALE SHOPPING CENTER NORTH Not to Scale O A e•n ANN O 10" oao NmN < I W 14 5 ♦— 216 �1 103 192 _ rl Y I 247 r. 64 W 69TH ST 100 353 W 76TH ST Y91 —� 1� 147 AA; 233 A maa+ N Nn Nm NO I 2 W 7 TH ST 204 Ana - e NaN mne ome, � L „4 m 42 -253 I -104 132 _ I _ at 114 222 394 i 134 ena 172 m'ION O p�m mNn n�� SON W n A < W W < V Z Y Q Q r. O > N ^ n n A I► � 94 2 � � � ♦ 269 rl I � 1 W 76TH ST 306 -� I I 2 204 Ana - SAO Barton -Aschman Associates, Inc. 1992 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Plus full Southdale Expansion Figure 10 ♦tea. e,� . . • N Mm 299 261 - X535 W 66TH ST 1 412 307 —� 94 1 —♦ 397 154 I 147 444 �7 1 � i 0 r! P. mno 00 NON „tON N O IA er SOUTHDALE W SHOPPING > CENTER Not NORTH aye- s W J J t P N N 1 N 145 10 3 216 192 1 266 78 100 W 69TH ST 100 1 � 1 353 I 291 —i I 203 262 m �n �- mOiN ^Y!N - X17 f0 N� r N O r W 70TH ST noa N o N ^ oa �e�� 114 �— 253 I ♦ — 104 I I� 142 II �95 190 I 394 309 OnO Om01 W � W W � N eoe o'^m I 168 .— 179 355 35 _ Y 201 60 W 76TH ST 23710 727 - -♦ 1098 - -00 �1� 316 I 248 N m ^ m n A e N N E O N N to 1992 P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Plus Full Southdale Expansion and Hedberg Traffic OBarton -Aschman Associates, Inc. - Figure 11 tiQation Measures Table 6 shows the level of service. after applying moderate mitigation mea mires. Adding a left -turn lane to the west approach of 66th Street at York Avenue would improve the level of service from E to D for the Southdale expansion scenario. All intersections except France and 76th would be operating satisfactorily for this scenario. M ere is adequate right -of -way at this intersection to upgrade it to satisfactory capacity. A further improvement to York and 66th by adding a through lane to the north and south approaches would improve the level of service from E to D for the scenario with Hedberg as well as the Southdale expansion. Adding a through lane to the north and south approaches of York Avenue at 69th Street would improve the level of service from E to D for the scenario for the Hedberg and Southdale expansion. Improvements to all four approaches to the intersection of York and 76th would probably overomie capacity problems in the scenario for the Hedberg plus Southdale expansion. Conclusions By 1992, the background traffic without Southdale would include a small growth in passing traffic together with growth resulting from existing developments which are either not complete or have not reached full occupancy. Some additional traffic would be generated by committed developments which will be cmpleted by that time. France Avenue and York Avenue between County Road 62 and I -494 will be operating at Level of Service D for the most part. Exceptions are France and 76th which would be operating at Level of Service F and York and 70th which would be operating at Level of Service C. The Swale expansion would change the level of service of York/66th from D to E. Level of Service D could be restored by the addition of an extra left -turn lane on the west approach of 66th Avenue. Zhe level of service of the other intersections would remain unchanged. The intersection of York and 76th would have its level. of service reduced from D to F by the addition of Hedberg. France and 76th which would be operating at Level of Service F by 1992 without either Southdale expansion or Hedberg, would be significantly more impacted by Hedberg. Zhe addition of Hedberg together with Southdale would. increase the traffic impact but tolerable levels of service could be restored with feasible road improvements. 25 MU31E 6 1992 IEVEIs OF SERVICE AFTER MITIGATION MFASURES (P.M. PEAK HouR) 1992 Hedberg And Background Southdale Southdale Intersection. Traffic Egmnsion Expansion - FYanoe /66th D+ D+ D+ France /69th D+ D+ D+ France /70th D+ D F France /76th F F F York/66th D D*1 D*2 York/69th D+ D E+ York/70th C+ C+ C York,/76th D+ D+ F *Mitigating measures applied *1 Add left -turn lane on west approach, making existing one left -turn lane into dual left -turn lanes. *2 Add one through lane to both north and south approaches. 26 Bart', m- Aschoman conducted a oamt of existing parking spaces at the Southdale Center on March 22, 1988. Existing parking spaces total 6,527. This resulted in an existing parking ratio of approximately 5.62 spaces per 1,000 square feet CIA. Figure 12 shows the existing parking layout. The expansion of the retail center will be acocaganied by the addition of three parking decks and a restriping of existing surface parking at a number of locations. The proposed alterations, based on concept design, will result in a tonal of approximately 6,972 parking spaces, representing a ratio of 5.15 spaces per 1,000 square feet GIA. The final number of parking spaces and the ratio may vary slightly based on refinement during the detailed design stage. Figure 13 shows the parking proposed for the expansion. M7ie new Dayton's store is to be located toward the northwest corner of the site. Parking decks will be provided over the lower level of parking areas to the northwest and to the southwest of the Dayton's building. The northwest deck will slope upwards at an acceptable grade frc-n the existing perimeter road and will park 317 on the structure. A parking floor will be excavated partially below ground level under the deck. The southwest deck will be constricted over the existing parking and will park 349 cars. The deck will be served by two ramps running from the perimeter road and will connect, directly with the deck to the northwest of the Dayton's store. The surface parking under the deck will be restriped. A third parking deck will be provided northeast of the J.C. Penney building. This deck will be constructed over the lower level of parking northeast of the existing building. The new deck will park 216 cars and will be served by ramps connecting to the perimeter road and the present upper level lot. Tine existing embankment running northeast frcaDn Donaldson's will be rotated to run eastwards, increasing the amount of parking adjacent to the first level of the Donaldson's. In addition to the voanstructionn of parking decks, several existing surface parking areas will be restriped to provide additional. parking. A detailed analysis of parking layout options. was undertaken to determine the parking angle and dimensions to be used. Key considerations were maintaining nt-a i n i ng ease of parking and uiparking maneuvers, providing additional spaces, accommodating parking deck structural considerations and ensuring options for future modifications to obtain additional parking increases. Inside the perimeter road all parking will be angled while the employee and overflow parking outside the perimeter road will remain right angled, as at 27 — WEST 66th ST 52 SPACES C6OPACES 11 ` I i I n n l 345 SPACES 934 SPACES 402 SPACES J. C. PENNEY 1713 SPACES 214S ES �\ J o DAYTON / \ \ \ 1207 SPACES \. \ �� 5341SPACES i 1 \ \\ \ ; o ' 805' SPACES � •' � \ 481 SPACES / ri a -- WEST 69 th ST. Barton— Aschnan Associates, Inc. 6527 EXISTING SPACES Existing Parking Figure 12 - r - WEST 66th 5T �• _ � _ , - - _ , .` _ -- 31 I > SPACES 1 — 83 SPACES..) II �LjjI I .149 SPACES 802 SPACES } ' //` .( < •� a ..._ �C ✓ 864. SPACES / �� �� •`� �' . \ ` \j - -� d i, off« jm(l S467 x • �•. , Deee�an was \ / JC.PENNEY "N DAYTOWS EM PANSION _ i ✓ / / 442 SSPACES DAYTON'S /� cS aS cs c6 �O Deal .0 WAyle c - -- DONALDSONS i N \ 1034 SP{10ES \ Y / 490 SPACES v - � g t � 11 I D \ 805 SPACES � o 484 SPACES f cm . _ NEST 69T S7 J 0 Barton- Asctsnan Assoelatss, ]I.- 6972 PROPOSED SPACES 6527 EXISTING SPACES 445 NET SPACES GAINED Proposed Parking Figure 13 Present. The right angle selection outside the perimeter road was based on a need to provide a maxim= number of spaces. Mie existing angle parking is based of an angle of 52 degrees with a stall width of 8.75 feet and a bay width of 50 feet and 52 feet. Lich of this angled parking will be maintained r+ta; ne in the proposed scheme. Different parking angles were adopted for the new decks, the parking tinder the decks and selected surface areas where an increase in parking spaces was needed. Parking angles of 70 degrees and 75 degrees with stall widths of 8.75 feet and bay widths of 56 feet were applied where appropriate to suit conditions. These parking angles maintain the, ease of maneuvering associated with angle parking, but more parking spaces in a given area than the existing 52 degree angle. Access and Circulation The one -ray perimeter road will be retained in the southdale expansion. The volumes on the perimeter road are higher and flow more effectively than any regional center the consultants have observed. At one time, parts of the perimeter road were handling over 11,000 vehicles per day. The cane -way works particularly well at Sauthdale because it has four high capacity arterials surrounding it and the traffic flows entering and departing from the site are fairly evenly distributed around all four sites. Figure 2 shows the distribution of traffic around the site. At present, the four sides of the site, France Avenue, 66th Street, York Avenue and 69th Street have 17 access points distributed among them. There are also a number of median breaks on each of these roads. In the original design there were multiple accesses and egresses on all four of the adjacent arterials and they were planned to operate without signal Control. Men France Avenue was upgraded to a six -lane divided road adjacent to the site, the access points were Consolidated to two points, providing ingress from both the north and south at one point and egress to both directions at another. Increasing traffic volumes on France Avenue and on development apposite Sauthdale dictated traffic signal control of the two access intersections. It is Contemplated that 66th Street, 69th street and York Avenue may be to urban design standards with curbs and gutters. this upgrading might require consolidation of access points to two intersections along each of the Sotthdale Frontages. garton- Ascdrman has prepared a some to accommodate this contingency at the rat of the City of Edina. This plan has been submitted to the city. The layout of the internal perimeter road and the location of parking aisles that have been proposed for the expansion of the center provide a flexibility that will enable such consolidations of access to be accomplished relatively simply. The symmetrical distribution of traffic approaching and entering the Southdale Center means that the access consolidation would oat disadvantage any of the tenants of the center. W 1 4, +CNB External Street Sjr3tem Traffic - intersections in the vicinity of the site are operating at satisfactory levels of service under present conditions. Analyses of various growth scenarios, including the Southdale expansion together with a large development on the Hedberg site were undertaken. These showed that -adequate traffic conditions can be maintained on the external street system under high growth conditions with moderate traffic mitigating measures. Adequate traffic conditions can easily be maintained for the proposed e_%pansion.with moderate traffic improvement measures. The original Scuthdale Center plan provided for access to and from the west via Valley View Road as an alternate to France Avenue and access to and from the east as.an alternate to the 62nd Street Crosstown Highway. Both the Valley View Road and 66th Street facilities have capacity to serve as Parallel aooess routes to France Avenue and the 62nd Street Crosstown. Aaoess and Circulation Bounded by four arterial roads and served by a system of high capacity highways, including freeways, the site has excellent regional access. Access to the site is currently distributed over 17 points arauxi the site. The symmetrical distribution of traffic visiting the site on the four arterials contributes to the success of the one -way perimeter road Providing the main circulation system. Surface parking areas and the Proposed Parking decks are conveniently connected to the perimeter road, providing rapid ingress and egress. The symmetrical distribution of traffic together with the location of parking aisles ensure that potential consolidations of access associated with any future road widenings will not disadvantage any areas of the site. Parking sions The addition of three parking decks and restriping of existing surface parking at a number of locations will ensure adequate parking on the site. The concept design provides approximately 6,972 spaces, resulting in a ratio of 5.15 spaces per 1,000 SF GIA. The Perking decks, the surface parking beneath them and sane of the existing surface Parking will be based on angle parking using 70 degree and 75 degree angles, as appropriate, with 8.75 foot wide stalls and bays 56 feet wide. These angles maintain the easy maneuvers of angle parking but are more efficient in the use of space and acoaamdate parking deck structural considerations. 31. S Me parking decks will be well connected to the perimeter road and to adjacent parking areas. Zhe configuration of parking aisles on surface areas results in easy circulation and convenient connections to the perimeter road. Rotating the earthworks embankment to increase the parking adjacent to Donaldsoat's-first level, together with the location of the three parking decks and restriping of selected surface areas, ensure appropriate distribution of parking over the site. Znviro®mmtal Awr vals The expansion proposed will not require envircxmerttal approvals to be obtained. Overall Oanditicats The traffic studies and investigation's all indicate that the proposed expansion can be acorn plished with adequate traffic conditions on the external street system. Excellent access and internal circulation will be ma; „ta i r,ar7 and adequate parking will be provided. N 32 IE I N Agenda Item V.0 Point of prance Association, Jnc. 6566 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 (612) 925 -2598 August 12, 1988 Frederick 0. Hutchinson 6566 France Ave. S. Apartment 311 Edina, Mn. 55435 Hon. C. Wayne Courtney, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Mn. 55435 Dear Sir, The Point of France Association comprising 144 property owners respectfully requests that the application by the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the Unites States for a permit td' expand Southdale Shopping Center be denied. Mr. Donald Brandt, owner, unit 110, Point of France, will attend the meeting of the City of Edina Planning Department on August 15, 1988 to offer testimony on behalf of the Association in opposition to the proposal. Association opposition stems from the growing isolation of the Point of France Condomihium brought about by the ever increasing flow of traffic on France Avenue and 66th Street and the inconvenience and danger it poses for Point of France residents - a situation that can only be exacerbated by the expansion of the Southdale center. One facet of life at Point of France that will be affected adversely by increased traffic is access to adult education. Although adult classes at the former Edina High School are nearby - within walking distance, in fact - and accessible to our residents via lightly traveled streets, they are not available to us because irregular school district boundaries relegate Point of France to the Richfield School District. I G This means' that Point of France Residents who wish to participate in adult educational activities must drive several miles in heavy traffic to reach the Richfield facility. Again, a, condition that will be made worse by expansion of the shopping center and the traffic it will .generate. As impediments to these facilities multiply a feeling intensifies that we are taxed for amenities we cannot use by a school board we are powerless to influence. ..Point of-France residents now must cross a six -lane highway, France Avenue, for. pedestrian access to public transportation or the Medical Arts building across the avenue. There are traffic lights at the corner of 66th street but no sidewalk on the opposite side. Furthermore, the lights. change too rapidly for elderly people to make the crossing safely. More traffic to an expanded Southdale will place.our residents at greater risk. The desirability.of transferring Point of France Condominium to the Edina School District and the need of a safe cross- walk'.over France Avenue exist now. Expansion of the Southdale.Shopping Center will make them urgent. Respectfully submitted, Point of France Association Frederick-0. Hutchinson President .1'1• e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE H�J• �N -4 �'l, TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer . VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: August 12, 1988 AGENDA ITEM VII•A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Street. Surfacing with Concrete Curb & Gutter Apache Rd. & Indian Way W. in Indian Hills W. Addn. Company Amount of Quote or ENd �• See Attached Bid Tabulation 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hardrives, Inc. - $ 27,365.38 u GENERAL INFORMATION: This project was petitioned by Mike Halley, the developer. The project is to place permanent street surfacing on concrete curb and gutter in the Indian Hills West Addition. The project would be started in 1988 and completed in 1989, and would be assessed over a ten year period. Si nat The Recommended bid is X — Within budget not �r 3 Engineering Departm 4 ,et o in, Finance Director Rosland, C Vy Manager August 11, 1988 11:00 A.M. BID TABULATION CITY OF -EDINA, MINNESOTA CONTRACT # 88 -5 (ENG) STREET SURFACING WITH CONCRETE CURB & GUTT ER APACHE ROAD AND INDIAN WAY WEST IN INDIAN HILLS WEST ADDITION BIDDER TOTAL Hardrives Inc. 27 365.38 Bury & Carlson Inc. 28 460.00 Barber Construction Co. Inc. 31-941.00 Alexander Construction Co. Inc. 32 579.00 H. L. Johnson Co. 39 769.50 Engineer's Estimate $ 36,665.53 VIII. A MINUTES TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AUGUST 9, 1988 9:00 A. M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Fran Hoffman, Chairman Alison Fuhr Lois Coon Gordon Hughes Craig Swanson MEMBERS ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: Ms. Mary Glavan Hosler, 5133 Halifax Avenue South Mr. John Knodle, 7609 Gleason Road Ms. Mary P. Dinneen, 7611 Gleason Road Ms. Renelle Nelson, 7627 Gleason Road Mr. John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue South Ms. Anne Bishop, 5324 Halifax Avenue South Ms. Donna Bohn, 5241 Halifax Avenue South Ms. Lori Smiley, 5308 Halifax Avenue South Mr. Seth Witts, 5113 Indianola Avenue Ms. Ruth Newcombe, 4075 West 51st Street, The Lanterns Mr. & Mrs. Chesley Carlson, 5225 Minnehaha Boulevard Ms. Jan Remington, 6424 Belmore Lane Captain Leonard Kleven, Edina Police Department Ms. Joan Waterstreet, Edina Police Department SECTION A Requests on which the Committee recommends approval as requested or modified, and the Council's authorization of recommended action. (1) Discuss traffic issues on Halifax Avenue, West 51st through West 54th Streets. Continued from July, 1988 meeting. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman opened the meeting by reviewing what has transpired on this issue since it was first introduced in April. He reiterated the use of a barricade as a temporary trial solution, how the traffic counts had been lowered on Halifax Avenue and somewhat increased on Indianola, and - finally summarized by stating that letters were still being received on this issue with somewhat of a 50 -50 split as to those opposed or in favor of making the barricade a permanent device. He also stated that after TRAFFIC'SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES August 9, 1988 Page 2 (Continued) presenting the-issue to the City Council at their last meeting, he was. of the opinion that the Council felt the "core" area that this diversion affected was greater than was initially thought. The zone of influence as presented by the Council would have the borders of West 50th Street and West 58th Street to the north and south, and Wooddale Avenue and France Avenue to the east and west. Mr. Hoffman also stated that, based on the options initially considered, he would be most inclined to favor a barricade at West 54th Street and Halifax Avenue as opposed to a perma- nent diverter at West 52nd and Halifax should the choice eventually come to those two possibilities. Mrs. Coon questioned the possibility of a small island being placed on West 52nd Street east /west through the intersection of Halifax Avenue that would, in effect, restrict all turning motions to the left. This would restrict travel north /south through that intersection but allow local access to West 51st Street, while somewhat discouraging southbound travel from West 51st Street, or northbound traffic from points south of West 52nd Street. Mr. Hoffman again addressed the issue of what constitutes a neighborhood collector street versus a neighborhood street and the traffic patterns that are established based on that criteria. Mr. Hughes felt that before any untried options should be considered, a decision should be made as to the success of the present barricade. Mr. Chesley Carlson read a letter he had submitted to the City Council and Traffic Safety Committee in which he stated that a large number of local neighbors were influenced by what he felt was an undue element of danger. He stated persons throughout the area had the same concerns for safety of children and increased traffic flow. However, does divert- ing traffic on Halifax Avenue only redistribute traffic to other even less safe areas. Mr. John Crist, Ms. Donna Bohn, and Ms. Mary Glavan Hosler all agreed that they are pleased with the current solution and they felt the neigh- borhood area as a whole must work together to resolve the problems. Mr. Seth Witts, in reviewing the volume figures before and after the barricade was installed, again asked what are acceptable and tolerable volumes and reitereated the findings that the speed problems on Halifax were not unique to that area as opposed to like areas of Edina. Ms. Ruth Newcombe, representing The Lanterns, thanked the Committee for the placement of "NO THRU TRAFFIC" signs for their lot, and also stated that the residents of the complex felt that the initial request for the barricade was made without their consideration. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES. August-9, 1988 Page 3 (Continued) Mr. Hoffman interjected that the issue is actually what function does Halifax Avenue perform. The issue encompasses where are the collector streets, which streets serve what neighborhoods, and what are the result- ing effects. He also said that if the barricade was placed to re- educate the public, whether it stays or goes, he felt the education process had been accomplished. Mrs. Fuhr questioned that since it appeared that a public hearing was in order, would the Committee need to take any further action at all. Mr. Swanson's opinion was that the Council would be looking for a recommen- dation from the Committee on the best possible alternative. In order to make that recommendation, he was not sure that all avenues had been closely enough scrutinized. The only tried solution had been the barricade and ° that was done with a predictable outcome. He felt that maybe enough re- education had taken place to warrant a trial period of removal of the barricade and signing only. Mr. Hughes' opinion was that the barricade had reduced traffic, as intended, and had not significantly increased traffic on adjoining streets. His belief was that the traffic reduction was valid, and therefore the option of the barricade did, in fact, work. Mr. Hughes moved to recommend to the City Council that the barricade on Halifax Avenue at West 51st Street be placed permanently. Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion for discussion purposes only. Mrs. Coon still was troubled by not only the increased traffic on adjacent streets, but also the safety hazards cited on West 50th Street and The Lanterns parking lot area as two examples. She felt that even though the traffic has been reduced on Halifax, the present solution is still not the safest solution. Mr. Swanson again stated that enough other options had not been tried, and Mr. Hoffman added that he questioned again should Halifax be considered a neighborhood collector versus a neighborhood street. The question was called for on Mr. Hughes motion and the motion was defeated 2 -3. Mr. Swanson moved that the Committee recommend to the City Council that the restrictor remain and report to the Council that, in fact, it has the desired effect to reduce traffic volumes; that the Committee cannot deter- mine neighborhood issues; and that the Committee also cannot define which roadways might be considered neighborhood roadways or neighborhood collector roadways. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Mr. Hoffman stated that by installing the barricade we have created a neighborhood roadway environment and he felt any changes within that core or "pod" area just made the issue more confusing to those driving in that immediate area. TRAFFIC SAFETY August '9, 1988 Page 4 (Continued) COMMITTEE MINUTES Mr. Swanson, however, reiterated that the Committee does not have the political charge to determine what is to be identified as neighborhood versus neighborhood collector roadways. Mr. Seth Witts stated that habits were developed to use Halifax Avenue during the West 50th Street construction period and he felt that possibly most drivers were now re- educated as to the proper use of Halifax Avenue. Mr. Crist also asked about the possibility of placing a barricade on Halifax Avenue at West 54th Street to restrict eastbound traffic from turn- ing left onto to northbound Halifax and westbound traffic from turning right onto northbound Halifax Avenue. Mrs. Coon felt that before she could comfortably recommend the original proposal of permanent placement of the barricade, the barricade should be removed and traffic counts taken to assess its effectiveness. The question was called for on Mr. Swanson's motion and the motion was defeated 2 -3. Mrs. Coon moved that the barricade be removed and large "LOCAL TRAFFIC ONLY" signs be placed on Halifax Avenue at West 51st Street, that new traffic counts and statistics be compiled and re- education assessed before the City Council's up blic hearing regarding this issue. Mr. Hoffman seconded the motion. Motion carried 3 -2. (2) Discuss parking concerns at 5100 block of West 50th Street. Unscheduled agenda item brought about by call to Captain Kleven from William Basill, 5045 Windsor Avenue. ACTION TAKEN: Captain Kleven brought this item before the Committee based on a complaint received from Mr. Basill. The area at present is posted "NO PARKING ". Due to the nature of some of the businesses presently located there, i.e., video rental store, etc., persons are stopping at the curbside to drop passengers and wait for them, or leaving running vehicles unattended while they run in to take care of their business. Mr. Basill's complaint was that this forces vehicles coming eastbound to turn into the on- coming westbound lane in order to go around parked /stopped vehicles and this has resulted in more than one near miss situation. Although the Traffic Enforcement Unit has been monitoring the area, it is still happening on a very frequent basis and some persons perceive that if there is a party who stays with the vehicle,' while it is running, this does not constitute "parking ". Mr. Hughes moved to install "NO PARKING OR STOPPING" signs along the 5100 block of West 50th Street. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5 -0. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES August 9, 1988 Page 5 (Continued) (3) Discuss traffic safety concerns on Timber Ridge Road. Unscheduled agenda item brought to Committee by Mr. Fran Hoffman. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman stated that it had recently been brought to his attention that the sharp curve area of Timber Ridge Road was a potential safety hazard due to lack of striping in the area. Vehicles negotiating the curves tend to cross the center of the roadway which at present is unmarked. Mr. Hughes moved that a center line be aip nted in the curve area of Timber Ridge Road and also that "CURVE" signs be posted . Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. (4) Discuss traffic diversion study currently being conducted by St. Louis Park. Unscheduled agenda item brought to Committee by Mr. Fran Hoffman. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Hoffman stated that he had recently received a letter from St. Louis Park documenting traffic counts conducted since the implementaion of their study and their effect on the north side of Edina. At present, there has been an increase in volumes particularly around the West 40th Street and Inglewood area. However, Mr. Hoffman stated that this increase is not substantial enough to cause undue concern. Mr. Hughes moved that we initiate written communication with the City of St. Louis Park �y way of a letter from our City Manager to document the fact that we have received their traffic diversion impact figures and will continue to monitor the impact on Edina resulting from their study. Motion seconded by Mr. Hoffman. Motion carried 5 -0. SECTION B Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request. NONE. SECTION C Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES August 9, 1988 Page 6 (Continued) (1) Discuss traffic safety concerns and signing on Gleason Road at Bonnie . - -- Brae - Drive. Requested by John Knodle, 7609 Gleason Road. ACTION TAKEN: Mr. Knodle opened by stating his concerns for the safety of those that live in this immediate area and the protection of their property,as well. In the last year, he has had nine vehicles that have come to rest in his front lawn, light poles knocked down twice and has lost two mailboxes due to vehicles traveling too fast to negotiate the curves. In the lastest incident, children playing in the front yard narrowly escaped injury. He has also noticed that vehicles approaching turning vehicles from behind usually take one of three options available to avoid collision, those being to brake sharply and stop if possible, to swerve right and strike retaining wall, or to veer left into the oncoming lane. All of these options are great safety hazards. He also said that volume has increased significantly due to vehicles using this route to travel from County Road 18 to the West 78th Street area, which also increases the risk of a major accident. Captain Kleven stated that to date there have been 21 reportable accidents in the area of Gleason Road between Dewey Hill and West 78th Street. He also said that incidents such as those mentioned by Mr. Knodle would in all likelihood not even have been reported thereby increasing that figure. Of those 21 reported accidents, five (5) have been in the immediate area of concern and all of those were due to vehicles crossing over the center line. He said that this area is not currently on the Traffic Units list of enforcement areas, however it has been quite heavily enforced in the past. Part of the problem of enforcement activities is that there is not a good location from which to conduct such activities and the traffic unit itself then becomes a safety hazard due to the geography of the area. Mrs. Fuhr asked what the present signing of this area was and was advised that, to the best of anyone's knowledge, this area did not currently have signing. Mrs. Coon also noted that we may want to consider installation of.a median in this area, similar to the one on Gleason Road just north of County Road 62, at some future time. Mr. Hughes moved to continue with Traffic Enforcement Unit activities until the September meeting pending both engineering and police assessment studies to be conducted before that time. Mrs. Fuhr seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. (2) Request to upgrade the intersection of Griffit Street and Belmore Lane from a two -way "STOP" to a four -way "STOP". Petition signed by numerous local residents. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE MINUTES August 9, 1988 Page 7 (Continued) . ACTION TAKEN: Ms. Jan Remington, representing the area, expressed her concern regarding increased speed on Belmore Lane especially in light of the fact that there are now several more children residing in the area. She also stated that there have been several near miss accident situations recently involving children playing or riding bikes near or on the street and vehicles travelling over the posted residential limits. Captain Kleven reported that there has only been one reported accident to date. Mrs. Fuhr moved to continue this item until the September meeting pending a study of the area by the Traffic Enforcement Unit. Mrs. Coon seconded the motion. Motion carried 5-0. Respectfully submitted, EDINA TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE City of Edina Attn: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 7/1/88 Fran Hoffman: As a home owner, expecting parent and tax payer of our city, my concerns about - rerouting traffic away from Halifax are great. Below is a list of my concerns on.a priority basis: #1 Home devaluation - As Halifax traffic is routed down my'street, Indianola, the value of my home will unquestionably be reduced. #2 Safety - As an expecting parent the thought of increased traffic on my street "scares me to death'.'! Also, using the alley next to the Peoples Gas station will become a thoroughfare. #3 Inconvenience - Making Halifax a one way was a "nice try" in pacifying local residents, but angers me when I come out of the.Lunds parking lot and must circle around several blocks to get to Indianola. #4 Taxes - Who's going to pay for the barriers you propose? It better not be Indianola residents. Since Halifax residents are the beneficiaries they should pay for all expenses. In conclusion, my vote is to do nothing. If anything, post a stop sign in the middle of Halifax to slow traffic. It's cheap and easy. Thank you for your consideration in making a fair and cost effective decision. Thomas M. LeGeros . e 62.4 9:z ti. Bennett & Mary Porter 5120 Halifax Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 Edina City Council 4601 West 50th Street Edina, MN SS324 July 9, 1966 Dear Council: The traffic barricade at 51st and Halifax has restored our neighborhood to a quiet community. Gone are the busy streets filled with cars taking shortcuts to and from downtown Edina. We would strongly support the City Council's action to make this barricade permanent. Larger parking lots and movie theaters will undoubtedly bring more cars to downtown and to our neighborhood unless this barricade is made permanent. Also, more traffic will make this intersection more dangerous. Please remember that it was not the Halifax neighborhood's intent to anger our neighbors on adjacent streets. We have compromised on our belief that a total traffic barricade is a better solution. The trial period has allowed everyone to see the REAL traffic effect on all the streets. We believe that the traffic safety reports will show that there has been a giant traffic reduction on Halifax and little impact on our neighboring streets. Mary and I enjoy walking the neighborhood at least twice weekly. This neighborhood does not stretch just up and down Halifax Avenue. It stretches from 50th to 54th and from France Avenue to the west bank of the creek. We feel we are a part of this community and that this whole neighborhood would benefit by the permanent reduction of traffic on Halifax Avenue. We know that the council also believes in the preserving the residential neighborhood. Please show your support for the permanent traffic barricade. incerely &IL a� Bennett Porter III Mary Jo Porter July 6,.1988 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th St. Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Council Members: My name is Teresa Forliti and I have lived at 5336 Halifax Ave. S. for 29 years. I want to thank you for the reduction in the traffic on Halifax Avenue because of the partial barrier and "No Entering" signs at 51st Street that were O X d by the council as a temporary situation. In the past, the traffic (not to mention the safety factors involved) have been excessive - especially since the road work done in previous years at the 50th and France Shopping area and traffic was diverted to Halifax Avenue.; While there is some inconvenience, (reeducating myself to go down France to 54th, Street because I have made the wrong turn several times during this change and the several extra minutes involved to return home), it is well worth any inconvenience to have this traffic reduction. I hope that the City Council will consider making this permanent. Thank you - Teresa Forliti 5336 Halifax,Ave. S. Edina, Mn. 55424 cc: Mr. Fran.Hoffman Edina City Engineer _z Y � A AJ- 9-1-11� ..eu� --� ,�,,,►.^�- . If .Ae� f cv * ,et ems,, ",jt tl-< UXh �-o� �-�-- G<-o a ��. i2e� -mac b� de�� ��ry► �u..� w,� ILK 4 AOLC T . fI� Iy'88 G� n 'V 2 42 � V7, V� 7/18/88 To Council 7 i17Z- P e�aG Jv?�« 11 710 I' Y G� OL (/�yio N. I, l� C a • - k n r July 14, 1988 Dear members of the Edina City Council, We are writing to ask you to continue the NO TURN south onto Halifax Avenue at 51st Street. We support making it a permanent restriction. At first we weren't sure. It was a bother to go out to France Avenue and come back to get home, and it was annoying to have to change our habits. But now we are used to going around. It is well worth it to have less traffic on Halifax. It also seems as if there are a lot fewer "in a big hurry" drivers on Halifax. If the traffic is down a lot on Halifax, and up only a little on neighboring residential streets, then it looks to us as if the through traffic has been diverted back to Prance or 50th where it belongs. Please vote to keep it there. Sincerely, Mary and David Thatcher 5309 Halifax Avenue S. Edina, MN 55424 922 -6874 Sa L-4- V"j? /Y(-, /it? V4 IL JL .Y 1111 West 107th Street Bloomington, MN 55431 August 1, 1988 Traffic Safety Committee Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Traffic Safety Committee; I am writing in support of the partial barracade at the intersection of 51st and Halifax. This barracade makes the surrounding area safer for the neighborhood children and the safety of our children should be our number one concern. Sincerely, karen Wylie July 21, 1985 TO: Traffic Safety Committee Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 5544 A number of us parents with small children in Edira were pleased with the Council's decision to help reduce traffic on Halifax Ave. with the partial barrier at 51 st. 1, too, live on a well - traveled street and have watched with great frustration as cars speed past our house. Drivers seem to have little regard for speed limits or children playing in front yards. Many of us moved to Edina because of our children and were disappointed with the apparent attitude that cars take precedence over kids. If the decision regarding Halifax is reversed by the complaints of those self - serving individUals who cannot take alternate routes, I, for one, am Going to have serious doubt= about the priorities of this cities' father'_; ... and mothers. avuk L. Pamela Lien 4400 W. 58th St. Edina, MN 55424 cc: Traffic Safety Committee _SYBIL SMILEY ADELSON 146 Marguerita.Avenue Santa Monica, California 90402 July 22, 1988 Dear Sirs: When my son and daughter -in -law moved to Edina I was delighted that they had chosen an area in which to live that is congenial to young growing families and especially to the needs and well being of children. When I first visited my family in Edina, I was happy to find that the reputation which Edina enjoys nationwide for lovely homes and beautiful surroundings was justified, but I was very disturbed about the heavy traffic which turns this lovely residential street into a freeway all day and night. Children cannot play out of doors unattended at any time; adults cannot take a walk on pleasant summer evenings, pets are safe only when indoors. As you know, the most well disciplined child is still just that -a child, who, in a moment of exuberant play could easily become the victim of a speeding driver and bring untold tragedy to the community as well as their family. No parent on Halifax Ave., So. can have peace of mind while this heavy traffic pattern continues on their street. No child can develop a sense of independence or responsibility if they must constantly be restricted and monitored by anxious parents. I have great fears about the safety of my lovely granddaughter, who, at age one is starting to walk and is eager to explore her environment. My children moved to Edina, rather than a congested city neighborhood precisely so that they and their children could enjoy a less stressful and confining way of life. I am sad that I cannot take the family dog for a walk without fear that he or I will be hit by a speeding car. There are no sidewalks on Halifax Ave. So., so walking in the street is the only way to get from one place to another. Pushing the baby carriage in the street is even more frightening. Little ones cannot ride their trycicles or pull their wagons or visit one another. Freedom of movement, freedom to socialize, freedom to explore are denied these children. The noise from heavy traffic is also a concern. It is continuous and frequently wakes the baby, as well as preventing me from having a restful night when I am visiting. July 22, 1988 Page 2 Halifax Ave. So. was never intended to be a major traffic - artery. France St., just a few seconds away, was designed for this purpose and is easily accessible to the cars which speed down Halifax Ave. So. more concerned about saving a minute than in preserving the integrity of a neighborhood or the life of a child. I am planning to visit Edina again on August 24. I hope that you will have taken positive measures to remedy this serious problem by then. Sincerely yours, Sybil S. Adelson I l RIDER,-BENNETT, EGAN Sc ARUNDEL WILLIAM T. EGAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW KAREN PARK GALLIVAN 70WARO M. ARUNDEL JEREMIAM P. GALLIVAN ONALD R. SACKSTROM 2500 FIRST BANK MARY C. LADE AVID F. FITZGERALO PLACE WEST MARTHA M. SIMONCTT .ARMY R. MENNEMAN. JANE S. WELCH JOHN P. FLATEN MINNEAPO MINNESOTA LOUISE A. DOVRE - DAYTON E. SOBr LI3, SS402 JILL FLASKAMP NAIBROOR$ DAVID J. BYRON JAMES L. FORMAN RICH APO J. NYGAARD _ JEFFREY O. CARPENTER JOHN C. UNTHANK TELEPHONE (612) 340 -7951 KENNETH S. GUENTHNER ALFRED SEOGWICK KEVIN D. MOFMAN STEVEN J. KLUZ TELECOPIER (612) 375 -0701 JAN M. GUN DERSON RICHARD H. KROCHOCK ROBERT A. AWSUMB GENE C. OLSON JAN ETTE K. BRIMMER. ' ROG ERR. ROE. JR - - - ANDREA BRECKNER NIELSEN SCOTT K. GOLDSMITH WILLIAM J. EGAN GREGORY M. WEYANOT. ERIC J. MAGNUSON August S, 19HH LAURA TUBBS BOOTH RONALD B. LAMNER. CRAIG M. POEM THOMAS G. ROCK JOHN B. LUNSETH Q JOAN S. MORROW WRITE RCS DIRECT DIAL NUMBER TERRI L. GROEN ROBERT J. CRAWFORD GENE M. MEN NIG JONATHAN N. JASPER LEWIS A. REMELE. JR. ANNE BRYANT WIGHT SHERYL RAMSTAD MVASS KEVIN C. DOOLEY MICHAEL D. TEWKSBURY MARK W. SCHNEIOER. 340 -8916 JOHN D. SAUNDERS GENE F. SENNETT DAVID R. STRAND (1926.1903) PAT RICIA A. BUPKE FRANK B. BENNETT - - KEITH J. KERFE LD I OF COUNS[L BRIAN A. WOOD. - - STUART W. RIDER. JR. ANN BARRY BURNS. KENNETH R. JOHNSON BARRY F- CLEGG DAVID M. BOLT .ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN Mr. Fran Hoffman City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hoffman: Fred Richards suggested that I write you regarding the City's decision to make Halifax Avenue, north of 54th Street, a one -way street. I reside at 5436 Brookview Avenue and have found the one - way street to be a great inconvenience. The inconvenience is two -fold. First, when travelling south on France Avenue, I normally turn at 49= Street to head south behind Clancys and Lunds, onto Halifax and then to 54th Street and Brookview. This is a much more direct route and avoids the significant congestion. on France Avenue_ and delays due to left turning vehicles at 50th and France. Second, my wife and I patronize Lunds, the (bank and merchants at 50th and France on virtually a daily basis. Instead of being able to drive straight .home, it is a true headache to either fight the traffic on France or to fight the traffic on 50th and attempt a left turn onto Juanita, Arden or Bruce._ It seems to me that when individuals bought homes on Juanita, Arden or Bruce, they did not anticipate that their streets would become through streets for traffic diverted from Halifax Avenue. On the contrary, people owing homes on Halifax bought their houses at a time when the street was a through street and they no doubt were aware of the traffic. I am certain .this condition' was reflected in both lower homes values on Halifax and increased home values on the other three streets. In addition, numerous cars have —been— cutting — through —the- alley behind the K Station across from the entrance to Lunds. RIDER, BENNETT, EGAN &. ARUNDEL Mr. Fran Hoffman Page Two August 5,.1988 This is again a direct route which avoids the significant congestions of 50th Street and France Avenue yet, I doubt that the use of an alley. as a thorough fare is desirable from any standpoint. In summary, we feel the use of the one -way street on Halifax is a great inconvenience to those of us for whom Halifax had been the most direct route to our homes. In addition, it has created a disservice to the residents of Juanita, Arden and Bruce Avenues. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, B Y FBB /mp Frank B. Bennett cc: Mr Fred Richards - City Council w4L-� 0-0%, !� od Tf 1 L D� ��Olp dwCZ6,: d3ca r aicr�tu� ccd c.nn .Gt /lncse4- /�l2�c�ce..� 97sz) cc: Traffic Safety Committee I Cl f r f t t rnfaier4le r�4.cYt� S if I t�. r+��R.l roc ;�,• r !C!f �r:•,Tr <� � frcCT. ,`jr, -c� .:c ir%L ca_ c� �� tc�v�C�l k►es.v T�k.� Tho.:. if S�rc:. S °+��^1w..� �� cct�C���r � _ �''. rnlnnJ,tnct tTl jlt;vt�Jrv1 '�a C�cluc �� J) ]� 1 n I�t rrw+.Th�,f S (^rn+eJt li, 6e ' J o L . .. _ 5Yor t-w;fax 14ve_S . r I ,Deo.f !'arrrCac� 51 s�-. f -his bp�r Q 4-rpn e,sjdou' c%cQ i v� r�tur,� n 4 001c'(,Y� 07r- On OU& Vr6e� had rev► �ia,�-�x . 0 nr hfrnah� . Byjweam 4L valc�me, c�rcQ.� -- eecf cF -fk cars if ups ��fricfinc, Pla� of -Fh c.hrdte0-, d.cd i'aec,(&m 01, 44-0, hml-meocvne/r -�o and, on ow� Sfrpet. has ive�t us lxce%. h�e��ha�C. m�orif� of us and '►u2, �UY'inCC7� cf�- U Wb'ax amd E15:1- 5313�at.c�ix ,� . _ i A.A cc: 'Fran Hoff maa ,^ LA.) c.•A Ct (,�(� AL AQir zr—•.n '.� �,. .�..5 _ .. _ tom' .7 000l e ,may , '',. -� i. ,'l LLa ��_• � {' r.�• %•I•S•'C. � - _�'�r.'1°.�b' 1 _; � l ' �v_a r �Rr; � •����( 4. .''^ Si. G � 5, 1, `� 1 r . . . _ � i , � !� #L � t �' l G• <A �/ �lY , A t! .L f� ti� r /1tt�d Y. 1 fi Q Y'. - LS . ° _ �.+ - ,, 1�...'yr :' s. {.x 'i ,�'r/• �r i!1'�h�r�A.f�,PY ^'.�•y 9 r C . .1.'. �; � � '. - tiyY � _ v' •� 't i (' �� s K . -•%SNY '.t; w S �d OL.t ,. i'3 �t }� 1���.��rrr �ij.,,•.• � .n•�i i:. � �- �-- •Sk'ili�.i;J� �j.:nt s• t ruy� •�. ��.;r�•. '• �.r K. al,:.'��.•ti'a.�''r�F �'^,G,+ �r1- �- �_ .1�� _,�. ? t '?� � Litt Syr•' w F. `+ J"�kc _ 't� ' �" ^ r ' �` {^,tr. To : c ir c0uWc-I L. SAFE - y C'oi m i rTE� Cr. 8r1Bl_ i T z S'13(6 /W 10rAX we-So. 1 AMOK RE'Trnln o ff! of TAE T,rqr-FI C AEsTRjc To {1,fffo 1 CR .VE A T hlFlc iF,4 A ✓F qr✓D .SisT St. onr 4 pcMgf g EArT V&/ . .t _ -. .-•i: is .�. T4- C'`��a 1. S X r.• v TI CC)' 7 C- o 4&AA"� co Jet C)r TI CC)' N-�t �rt� .., �_r. fey+ � � r AWWE . f� <K' r,: ,... i''�h •• _ :� "- �'w,1. . YS�V s«ys.� i � �� � ��r - . L O' �� ��� �� �J� �� �� S'i'a.L �� 4 �"'�-- � -�-�Li /� A fir.: .. �. � :. i''�h '( . o e s ', REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Hr� "." -• • Y.. To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From :' MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: AUGUST 11, 1988 Subject: NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD NOMINATION Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # VIII. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Earlier this year the City received a list of member -at -large appointments to Hennepin County committees that will expire during 1988. The Council was advised that the appointments would be placed on the Agenda approximately 30 days prior to expiration of terms so that if they so desired the Council could send nominations to the Hennepin County Board. The term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board will expire as of 09/29/88 per the attached list. This will be on the August,15, 1988 Council Agenda for.discussion and possible action. *Currently Announced 1988 SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS MEMBERS AT LARGE TERM ENDING --- -- -- -- -- COMMITTEE /BOARD ----------------- --- --- ---- INCUMBENT LENGTH OF TERM 01/01/88 -- -- ---------- - - - - -- *CORA CTIONS ADVISORY BOARD ---- ---- --- -- - - - - -- John Hartsfield ----- --- -- -- 2 years -- Warren Limmer Joanna Buzek Gerald Kaplan Dan Cain James Just Bruce Sabatke Tom Lavelle Sigmund L. Fine 01/02/88 *PERSONNEL BOARD Barbara J. Berry 4 years Duane Elvin 4 years 01/31/88 LIBRARY BOARD Ellen McInnis 3 years Jack Cole 02/05/86 HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Myrna Hammer 3 years Thomas McMullen Eugene Jereezek Dan Frump Robert Arthur Michael Glal,ion James Adams 03/08/88 MINNEbQ�iA:G1tE:}:K,�+I�S lZi�Tlt; CT Albert Lehman 3 years Richard Miller 03/11/88 MENTAL COMMITMENT ATTORNEY PANEL ADVISORY BOARD Jay Arneson 2 years Susan Lentz. Wright Walling Thomas Tinkham Sharon Wildfang V.) /2t /da LOWER MN RIVER W/S DISTRICT William Jaeger, Jr. 3 years. 04/30/88 HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE 1NDUST1•Y CUUNCIL Lscer williamb 3 yC„rs 06/11/88 HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Joyce Orbuch 3 years 07/•30J88 RILEY - PURGATORY -BLUFF CREEK W/S DISTRICT Howard Peterson 3 years 06/04/88- MINORITY EMPLOYMENT AND CONTRACTING ADV C'TEE S. Cy Jones 1 year Beverly Grandbois Sarah Hernandez " K. Dennis Kim 08/26/88 COMMUNITY ACTION FOR SUBURBAN HENNEPIN BOARD VACANT Peggy Kelly Gretchen Hallowell VACANT 1 year VACANT Gloria Johnson 09/17/88 HENNEPIN TEA PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL Len Kodet 3 years 09%29%88 NINE MILE CREEK W/S DISTRICT —` -Dr—Eugene Davis 3 year s 12/31/86 COUNTY EXTENSION COMMITTEE "-'Florence Larson years Joan B. DeMeules 3 years f a t*wA. 1 Al 4 •L', p e' REPORT/RECOMMENDATION .,,. OIVIMEIVDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: AUGUST 11, 1988 Subject: 1988 NLC Congress of Cities, December 3 -7, Boston Recommendation: Info /Background: Agenda Item # viii . C Consent ❑ Information Only [-x] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance The attached mailing was received regarding the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities to be held December 3 -7 at Boston, Massachusetts. This matter has been placed on the August 15, 1988 Council Agenda for discussion and consideration by the Council. League of Minnesota Cities July 22, 1988 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101.2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221 -0986) TO: Mayors, Managers, Clerks FROM: Ann Higgins, Federal Liaison SUBJECT: 1988 NLC Congress of Cities, December 3 -7, Boston, Massachusetts City officials need to begin planning now to attend the 1988 NLC Congress of Cities, December 3 -7, in Boston. LMC urges you to.make decisions immediately regarding registration and travel arrangements to take advantage of lower fares and convenient accommodations. Attendance by city officials is likely to be very high since the historic area and opportunities for lively meetings combine to offer a strong interest for officials seeking the latest information and up -dates on urban issues. If your city clerk does not have a conference program brochure,and registration form from the National League of Cities, please call and request one. TRAVEL AND HOTEL RESERVATIONS Below please find flight schedules and available airfares arranged by International Travel Exchange... Cindy Arendts is- providing the bookings for.travel reservations for Minnesota city officials on the flights listed here. If you have questions, please call her at 612 -483 -8236. Please pay close attention to fare restrictions and deadlines for reservations and payment. In order to obtain the lower fares, it is important to be certain that you will not need to change or cancel your - flight reservation because costly penalties are imposed. Airline Flight Schedule and Airfare Information The following flights are available for travel to and from the conference: TO BOSTON: Friday, December 2 departs Mpls /StP arrives Boston Northwest #720 8:05 a.m. 11:50 a.m. *Northwest #1642 5:50 p.m. 9:35 p. m. Saturday, December .3 Northwest #720 8:05 a.m. FROM BOSTON: Wednesday, December 7 departs Boston Northwest #47 4:10 p.m. Northwest #357 6:55 p.m. Thursday, December 8 11:50 a.m. arrives Mpls /StP 6:20 p.m. 8:45 p.m. Northwest #153 9:00 a.m.' 10:57 a.m. *Reservations on NW #1642 - outgoing and returning on either Wednesday or Thursday will result in lowest available fare, due to late time of day departure. Check with travel agency. Fares available as of 7/19/88: $195.50 - $210.50 (including taxes) Airfares and times are subject to change International Travel Exchange Will provide up -to -date information on lowest available fares and seating as well as flight schedule changes.. Please be sure to contact Cindy Arendts if you have questions. (See phone numbers listed below.) To make reservations, call Cindy Arendts at International Travel Exchange at 612- 483 -8236 or 1- 800 - 328 -6795, Extension 483. The address for the travel agency is as follows: Cindy Arendts ' International Travel Exchange 3585 North Lexington Avenue, Suite 120 St. Paul, MN 55126 Limited Super Saver seats are available on the flights listed above. Make your reservations early to obtain lowest available rates. These rates are based on non - refundable, non - exchangeable tickets. be preferable to make reservations at higher, non - restrictive rates if It would you are likely to need to change your travel plans after you have made your reservations. PLEASE MAKE RESERVATIONS BEFORE OCTOBER 15 TO ASSURE BEST POSSIBLE SEATING AND FLIGHT SELECTION. LIMITED SEATING IS AVAILABLE ON ALL FLIGHTS LISTED, BUT AVAILABILITY DEPENDS ON DEMAND. Northwest Airlines will guarantee refunds in case airfares are lowered after ticketing is completed for those with reservvations made earlier. If ticketing is not complete prior to the effective date for higher rates, higher rates will prevail. Hotel Accommodations - A Word of Caution It is equally important to avoid any cancellation or changes in NLC Conference registration since the demand for hotel space will be high, ..resulting in.hotel accommodation reservations at distant locations for late registrants. If you change your arrival date, the hotel may not agree to hold your reservation-(and release your room, while retaining your deposit). HOTEL ROOM RESERVATIONS MUST BE GUARANTEED BY A NATIONAL CREDIT CARD OR BY SENDING_THE.HOTEL.A DEPOSIT NO LATER THAN NOVEMBER 4 (AFTER--YOU HAVE RECEIVED CONFIRMATION OF YOUR ACCOMMODATIONS FROM THE HOTEL). THE HOTEL WILL AUTOMATICALLY CANCEL YOUR HOTEL RESERVATION UNLESS SUCH ARRANGEMENTS ARE MADE. IMPORTANT NLC PROGRAMS The recently opened Hynes Convention Center will-be the site of NLC Conference programs. .Hotels adjacent to the center offer more than 5,000 rooms, along with enclosed walkways linking the convention .center to shopping areas. The NLC brochure that has been sent to many cities also describes pre- conference seminars and other related conference events and activities. Many require payment in addition to the NLC conference registration fee. Please note that registrations postmarked'by September 5 are at a reduced rate (early registration). NLC has invited both presidential hopefuls to address the conference so city officials may get a chance to hear a major address by the .president- elect. Four workshop tracks have been organized: "Investing in People) and Neighborhoods"; "Creating Economic Vitality "; "Financing Your City's Infrastructure" and "Controlling and Managing Growth ". In addition, there are sessions emphasizing leadership skills including "Leadership Dynamics - Dynamic Leadership" and "New Ways to Deliver Traditional Services ". In addition to the major program tracks, the conference also offers a variety of special workshops on such topics as "Reconciling Public '`Office,.Family and Career"; "Hot Topics for Local Legislative Control"; "Siting Municipal Incinerators"; "City and Bank Partnership for Community Reinvestment", etc. Workshops will be held on Sunday, December 4, as well as on Monday - Wednesday, Deecember 5 -7. Minneapolis be will be featured in a program on neighborhood livability, along with other innovative and helpful how to presentations from cities across the nation. NLC POLICY COMMITTEE MEETINGS AND POLICY ADOPTION Minnesota city officials serve on all 5 NLC Steering Committees. Policy recommendations from each of those committees will be reviewed by the full NLC Policy Committees (to which LMC is authorized to appoint Up to 5 additional Minnesota city officials to serve as policy committee members for a one -year term which commences each year at the NLC Congressional -City Conference, held in February or March; those appointments may.also be renewed for addtional terms.) Policy committees will meet to deliberate and vote on policy recommendations on Sunday, December 4. Those actions will then be, reviewed by the NLC Resolutions Committee on Monday, December 5. Policy committee meetings will be held in the morning at 9:00 a.m.; and again in the afternoon. Afternoon committee sessions are scheduled to end by 4:30 p.m. (A more detailed schedule of committee meetings will be available in the fall; committees will be scheduled for either the a.m. or p.m. slots; no committee meetings will be scheduled for the full day on December 4.) City officials appointed to 1988 NLC policy committees are a ected to Ill attend those im ortant olic develo ment discussions and artici ate in the policy review and adoption City officials serving as NLC voting delegates for their city or for-LMC will have voting privileges at the NLC Business Meeting, to be held on Wednesday, December 7, beginning at 10:30 a.m., immediately following the closing general session. It is very important that the League have a full slate of voting delegates present for the business meeting. Please plan your schedule accordingly if you are appointed a voting delegate (or alternate) for your city. FUTURE MAILINGS AND INFORMATION ON LMC DELEGATION ACTIVITIES Later this fall, I will mail information on policy issues and Minnesota delegation activities to all city officials who currently serve on NLC committees as well as to all other city officials registered for the confereence.- The League is making special arrangements this year for exciting and unusual delegation programs at the NLC conference. We want to give LMC member city officials a chance to take part in special programs platnned especially for LMC delegates. You'll hear more,about these activities in the fall when NLC registration information will provide the League with a list of those registered for the conference. Right now, be sure to reserve Sunday afternoon, December 4, at 5:00 p.m. for the LMC Delegation Caucus, a meeting that has traditionally preceded the final policy adoption session for the conference delegates. The delegation meeting will be held in the Hynes Convention Center. Room location and.other information will be available at a later date. League of Minnesota Cities 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227.5600 (FAX: 221.0986) Please note that a metro area regional meeting has been added for September 12. The meeting will be held in New Brighton at Robert Lee's Restaurant. League of Minnesota Cities 1988 Regional Meetings Date City - Location /Contact Person Tues., September 6 Bemidji Holiday Inn Dorothy Boe, City Clerk (218) 751 -5610 Wed., September 7 Floodwood Floodwood Community Center Mary Larva, City Clerk (218) Thurs., September 8 Hoyt Lakes Hoyt Lakes Arena. Rick Bradford, Administrator (218) 225 -2344 Mon., September 12 New Brighton Robert Lee's Restaurant Pat Lindquist (612) 633 -1533 i Wed., September 14 Plummer Afternoon: Plummer City Hall Evening: Plummer School Deb DuChamp, City Clerk (218) 465 -4239 Thurs., September 15 Henning Henning Community Center Wilma Morse, Clerk- Treasurer (218) 583 -2402 Mon., September 19 Tracy Tracy Servicmen's Center David Spencer, Finance Director ('507) 629 -4020 Tues., September 20 Kerkhoven Kerkhoven Civic Center Mona Doering, Clerk- Treasurer (507) 264 -2581 Wed., September 21 Cold Spring Blue Heron Verena Weber, Clerk- Treasurer (612) 685 -3653 Thurs., September 22 Pine City Community Room, Munc. Bldg. Dan Kieselhorst, Clk- Treas. (612) 629 -2988 League.o.f Minnesota Cities 1988 Regional Meetings (continued) Date City Location. /Contact Person Mon., September 26 Plainview Afternoon: American Legion Evening: Clayt's Supper Club Don Koverman, Administrator (507) 534 -2229 Tues.., September 27 Austin. Austin Country Club Darrell Stacy, Administrator (507) 437 -7671 Wed.,' September 28" St. James St.-James VFW Club David Osberg, City Manager (507)- 375 -3241 Thurs., September 29 New Prague New Prague Golf Club Jerome Bohnsack, Admin. -Clerk (612) 758 -14401 League of minnesota Uities July. _26,- 1988 - -- 183 University Ave. East St. Paul, MN 55101 -2526 (612) 227 -5600 (FAX: 221.0986) TO: Mayor's, Managers and Clerks FROM: Joel J. Jamnik, Legislative Counsel RE: LMC.and AZU ( Joint Solid Waste Study The League and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities have begun to organize a committee to research and make recommendations to the Associations respective policy committees regarding certain solid waste issues. Most specifically, the issue of volume based collection systems and billing practices will be examined, since the issue will likely be the focus of Legislation in the 1989 session. We are thus soliciting volunteers with an interest and /or knowledge of Solid Waste Management to serve on this joint committee, which will begin meeting probably mid to late August. Please talk to meat the League if you or other city staff are interested in participating. M AFClTT TTTTONT WHEREAS, the term of Dr. Eugene Davis on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board will end on September 29, 1988; BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that it hereby recommends and nominates Dr. Eugene Davis to the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners for re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board and urges the Commissioners to approve the re- appointment. ADOPTED this 15th day of August, 1988. Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 15, 1988 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 16th day of August, 1988. City Clerk p e -5; n, ` REP RT /RECOMMENDATIO -N To: KEN ROSLAND,-MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: AUGUST 11, 1988 Subject: HEARING DATE FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Recommendation: Agenda Item # VTTT.D Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion El Resolution ❑ Ordinance Adoption of a resolution setting September 19, 1988 as hearing date for special assessments. LM Info /Background: It is recommended that a hearing date of September 19, 1988 be set for the assessment of public improvements that have been constructed. This is the normal procedure in order to certify the special assessments to Hennepin County by October 11, 1988 as required by statute. o�. e.. J J; REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER Date: AUGUST 15, 1988 Subject: SEWER AND WATER RATE STUDY Agenda Item # VIII . E Consent Fx_] Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: Defer action until September 12, 1988. M Info /Background: Attached is an updated report and supporting information for the proposed sewer and water rate increase. a M E M O R A N D U M T0: CITY COUNCIL FROM: KENNETH ROSLAND CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SEWER AND WATER RATES DATE: AUGUST 10, 1988 As a follow -up to the City Council's comments and directions of August 1, we have re- analyzed the sewer and water .rate structure to assist the Council in its decision regarding rate adjustments. REASONS FOR RATE ADJUSTMENTS Sewer and water rate increases are required for three reasons: A. Increase in M14CC Collection and Treatment Charges. The Metropolitan Waste Control Commission has raised its charges to the City by $112,760 or 5 %, in 1988. It is important to note that sanitary sewer charges account for approximately 75% of our utility bill. Virtually all of this sewer charge is attributable to MWCC charges with only a small percentage attributable to City related sanitary sewer costs. B. Capital Improvements The City water system requires the construction of one additional water tower and the installation of one new well. It should be noted that our last water tower was constructed in 1970 and our last well was installed in 1973. The cost of these improvements .total approximately $1.5 million. We propose to finance these improvements through a bond issue of $1.0 million in combination with $500,000 from the Utilities Fund surplus. The reduction of borrowing from $1.5 million to $1.O million will reduce our annual principal and interest payments to about $144,000. C. Operating Losses in.the Utilities Fund The Utilities Fund incurred an operating loss of $279,294 in 1985 and $589,891 in 1986. On January 1, 1987, the City increased sewer rates by 25% and water rates by 10 %. Nevertheless, our recently completed audited financial statements show a loss of $73,681 for 1987, even though heavier than normal water usage was experienced prior to the July 23, 1987 flood. We expect the trend of operating losses will continue without rate increases. PROPOSED RATE INCREASES The objectives of our proposed rate increases are to: o cover increases in MWCC rates o finance improvements to the water system o break even on Utilities Fund operations After reviewing our projections presented at the August 1 meeting, we believe that we can accomplish the above objectives by way of a $.07 per 100 cu. ft. water rate increase rather than a $.09 increase as presented earlier. We continue to recommend a sewer rate increase. f rom $1.10 cu. ft. to $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. in order to cover MWCC charges. Based upon Council.direction, we propose to maintain the current minimum charge of $27.10 rather than to increase it to $31.40 as previously recommended. At the same time, however, we suggest that this minimum charge should apply for the first 1800 cu. ft. of usage rather than the present 2000 cu. ft. threshold. This recommendation is made in order to avoid a new tier system -which would be caused by increasing rates on one hand, while preserving the minimum charge of $27.10 on the other. According to our records, 5,148 of our 13,623 utility customers (i.e. 380) used less than.2000 cu. ft. during the past winter quarter, thereby qualifying for the minimum charge. If the threshold were reduced to 1800 ctt. ft, 4382 customers (i.e. 32 %) would have qualified for the minimum. Therefore, we believe that reducing the minimum to 1800 cu. ft. would have little effect on most small water and sewer users. The cost impact for those between 1800 cu. ft. and 2000 cu. ft. would be quite nominal. For example, a user of exactly 2000 cu. ft. would be charged $30.20 rather than $27.10: First 1800 cu. ft. $27.10 200 cu. ft. additional water .80 200 cu. ft. additional sewer 2.30 Total $30.20 The $.07 per 100 cu. ft. water.rate increase :would increase total revenues by approximately $210',000 which should cover our costs for capital improvements as well as cover operating costs. Therefore, our present and proposed rates are: CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES WATER $.33 per-100 cu. ft. $.40 per 100 cu. ft. SEWER 1 to 2000 cu. ft. - $20.50 $1.15 per 100 cu. ft. 2001 to 4000 cu. ft. - $32.75 4001 to 7000 cu. ft. - $56.25 7001 cu. ft. and over - $1.10 per 100 cu. ft. MINIMUM CHARGE $27.10 for first 2000 cu. ft. $27.10 for first 1800 cu. ft. ELIMINATION OF TIER SYSTEM FOR SEWER CHARGES we continue to recommend that the tier system for sewer charges.should be eliminated. As explained in earlier memos, the tier system, in effect, causes the lower user to subsidize the sewer charges for the higher user. A rate system based on actual usage is recommended. COMPARISON WITH SURROUNDING CITIES Me attached graphics have been revised to reflect the rate structure which we are now recommending. We believe you will agree that Edina's rates continue to compare very favorably with our neighbors. CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER RATE COMPARISON Current Rates Proposed Rates Water '$.33 per 100 cuft $.40 per 100 cuft Sewer 1 cuft to 2000 cuft - $20.50 $1.15 per 100 cuft 2001 cuft to 4000 cuft - $32.75 4001 cuft to 7000 cuft - $56.25 7001 cuft and over - $1.10 per 100 cuft Meter Charge $0.00 $0.00 Minimum Charge $27.10 $27.10 t Total.Sample Revenue for One Quarter 4 4 4 1 Q Average User Charge., For One Quarter $43.96 Sample includes 108 Users 45.50 APPENDIX A CITY OF EDINA SEWER b WATER RATE STUDY JULY 1988 THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF SEWER AND WATER RATES BY SELECTED CITIES. FOR COMPARITIVE PURPOSES, WE HAVE COMPLETED A SAMPLE OF 108 RESIDENTS USING SIMILAR QUANTITIES OF WATER USED FOR ALL CITIES. THIS ANALYSIS SHOWS EDINA'S PROPOSED RATES COMPARE FAVORABLY WITH THE OTHER CITIES RATES. CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY SEWER WATER CHARGES: WATER: $.84/100 CUFT $.64/100 CUFT $:33/100 CUFT $.40/100 CUFT 1st 3,000,CUFT $.489/100 CUFT NEXT 44,000 CUFT $.455/100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE OVER.47,000 CUFT $.420/100 CUFT 21000 CUFT: 1,800 CUFT: $6.60 $6.60 SEWER: $.882/100 CUFT $.67/100 CUFT $1.12/100 CUFT $1.15 /100 CUFT 1 TO 2,000 CUFT _ $20.50 2,001 TO 4,000 CUFT $32.75 MINIMUM USEAGE 4,001 TO 7,000 CUFT $56.25 1,800 CUFT: 7,001 AND OVER $1.10 /100 CUFT $20.50 FIXED CHARGE $6.35 $4.50 $.00 $.00 $.00 METER CHARGE $3.92 $3.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 SAMPLE REVENUE (108 USERS) $5,206.64 $5,347.55 $5,288.80 $4,693.64 $4,913.47 AVERAGE USER $48.21 $49.51 $48.97 $43.46 $45.50 APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 1 OF 2 SEWER S WATER RATE STUDY JULY 1988 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARR RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 1200 CUBIC FEET: WATER $5.87. $10.08 $7.68 $6.60 $6.60 METER CHARGE. - 3.92 3.00 SEWER 10.58 8.04 13.44 20.50 20.50 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $26.72 $25.62 $21.12 $27.10 $27.10 1800'CUBIC FEET: WATER $8.80 $15.12 $11.52 $6.60 $6.60 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 15.88 12.06 20.16 20.50 20.50 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $34.95 $34.68 $31.68 $27.10 $27.10 2000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $9.78 $16.80 $12.80 $6.60 $8.00 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 17.64 13.40 22.40 20.50 23.00 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $37.69 $37.70 $35.20 $27.10 $31.00 2100 CUBIC FEET: WATER $10.27 $17.64 $13.44 $6.93 $8.40 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 - SEWER 18.52 14.07 23.52 32.75 24.15 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $39.06 $39.21 $36.96 $39.68 $32.55 3100 CUBIC FEET: WATER $15.13 $26.04 $19.84 $10.23 $12.40 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 27.34 20.77 34.72 32.75 35.65 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $52.74 $54.31 $54.56 $42.98 $48.05 4000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $19.22 $33.60 $25.60 $13.20 $16.00 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 35.28 26.80 44.80 32.75 46.00 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $64.77 $67.90 $70.40 $45.95 $62.00 APPENDIX B CITY OF EDINA PAGE 2 OF 2 SEWER b WATER RATE STUDY JULY 1988 CITY OF EDINA ST. LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD HOPKINS CURRENT RATES PROPOSED RATES 4100 CUBIC FEET: WATER $19.68 $34.44 $26.24 $13.53 $16.40 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 36.16 27.47 45.92 56.25 47.15 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 -- - - $66.11 $69.41 $72.16 $69.78 $63.55 7000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $32.87 $58.80 $44.80 $23.10 $28.00 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 61.74 46.90 78.40 56.25 80.50 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $104.88 $113.20 $123.20 $79.35 $108.50 7100 CUBIC FEET: WATER $33.33 $59.64 $45.44 $23.43 $28.40 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 62.62 47.57 79.52 78.10 81.65 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $106.22 $114.71 $124.96 $101.53 $110.05 8000 CUBIC FEET: WATER $37.42 $67.20 $51.20 $26.40 $32.00 METER CHARGE 3.92 3.00 SEWER 70.56 53.60 89.60 88.00 92.00 FIXED CHARGE 6.35 4.50 $118:25 $128.30 $140.80 $114.40 $124.00 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY SEWER S WATER CHARGES: WATER: $.84/100 CUFT $.64 PER 100 CUFT. $.33 PER 100 CUFT $.40 PER 100 CUFT 1st 3,000 CUFT $.489/100 CUFT NEXT 44,000 CUFT $.455/100 CUFT MINIMUM USEAGE MINIMUM USEAGE OVER 47,000 CUFT $.420/100 CUFT 21000 CUFT: 1,800 CUFT: $6.60 $6.60 SEWER: $.882/100 CUFT $.67/100 CUFT. $1.12 PER 100 CUFT $1.15 PER 100 CUF 1.TO 2,000 CUFT $20.50 2,001 TO 4,000 CUFT $32.75 MINIMUM USEAGE 4,001 TO 7,000 CUFT $56.25 1,800 CUFT: 7,001 AND OVER $1.10 PER 100 CUFT $20.50 METER CHARGE $3.92 $3.00 $.00 $.00 $.00 FIXED CHARGE $6.35 $4.50 $.00. $.00 $.00 Ouarterly Bill in dollars 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 500 100015002000250030003500400045005000550060006500700075008000 Usage in Cubic Feet Sewer & Water Rate Study Current vs. Proposed Rates Edina — Current Edina — Proposed Sewer & Water Rate Study Sample of Selected Cities Quarterly Bill in Dollars 150 140 130 120 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 500 10001500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 Usage in Cubic Feet St.Louis Park Richfield Hopkins Edina — Proposed • 1 tio��r.lY�, p e CM REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: KEN ROSLAND, MANAGER From: MARCELLA DAEHN, CLERK Date: AUGUST 11, 1988 Subject: PETITION-FOR STREET VACATION WILLISON DR Recommendation: Agenda Item # Lx-A Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑] To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance Adoption of a resolution setting September 12, 1988 as hearing date for vacation of Willison Drive right of way. W Info /Background: A petition was submitted on August 9, 1988 by Harvey.Swenson requesting the Council to vacate the Willison Drive right of way on the plat of EDENMOOR (see attached application and letter). I recommend that be placed on the August 15, 1988 Council Agenda to set a hearing date of September 12, 1988 to consider the vacation. CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION APPLICATION -Date Initiated _August 9. 1988 1) Thereby petition the City Council of the City of Edina to vacate all of the following described public right -of -way: X Street _ Alley Utility Easement Drainage Easement Other (describe) Description of area proposed to be vacated: That part of Edenmoor Street dedicated as.Willson Drive on the plat of "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ") lying west of the southerly'extension of the east line of Lot 3, Block 3, "EDENMOOR, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ", according to the recorded plat thereof. g! rnThi Attached copy of scaled drawing showing in full detail a proposed vacation. Signature HARVEY SWENSO .;�,� =rL , V.1 Address e o Edina Mn 55436 Telephone 830 -9003 2) Review CITY ENGINEER by Acceptable Opposed Conditional Conditions MINNEGASCO by Acceptable =Opposed Conditional Conditions N.W. BELL by Acceptable Opposed Conditional Conditions N.S.P. by Acceptable Conditions 10 -3800 =Opposed Conditional " August'9, 1988 Green Valley Properties, Inc. 6100 Green Valley Drive Bloomington, Minnesota 55438 Ms. Marcella Daehn, City Clerk City of Edina 4801 W. 50 th Street. Edina, Minnesota, 55424 Dear Ms. Daehn: (612) 830 -9003 Enclosed is the completed application for Public Right - Of -Way vacation.and a check in the amount of $75.00 for the required fee. This application relates to that part of Edenmoor Street (formerly Willson Drive) lying westerly of Sherwood Road. This 30 foot +/- right- of -way was originally dedicated in the Edenmoor plat in 1941 (Exhibit 1) and has never been improved or used for street purposes. On June 20, 1988 the Edina City Council granted preliminary plat appVoval (Exhibit 2) of Swenson's replat of Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 3, EDENMOOR into four lots of "PINEWOOD" (Exhibit 3) which includes the proposed right -of -way vacation. Also enclosed is a copy of the proposed plat of "PINEWOOD" (Exhibit 4) which shows the proposed vacated right -of -way included as part of the southerly portions of Lots 3 and 4 and also the proposed new street right -of -way to be dedicated for Pinewood Trail at the north end of the proposed plat. The legal description of the right -of -way requested to be vacated has been provided by my land surveyor and is set out on the enclosed applicication. Mr. Craig Larsen, City Planner, indicated.that this right -of- way vacation application would have to be processed prior to my final plat, so I'd appreciate action on this application as soon as possible. S; �erely, i arvey G. wenson Copy to. Mr. Craig Larsen Mr.. Fran Hoffman Enclosures vi ,aaa REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: THE MAYOR AND Agenda Item # XII . A' From: CITY COUNCIL KENNETH ROSLAND Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 15, 1988 Mgr . Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: 0 To Council 1989 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: VC Info /Background: 1. Levy limits memorandum 2. News article on Council salaries 3. 1988 Budget Study 4. 198.9 Revised.Budget.Assumptions from August 1, 1988 Council Meeting 5. Proposed Salary Increase - 1989 M E M O R A N D U M TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: KENNETH.ROSLAND, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: LEVY LIMITS DATE: AUGUST 15, 1988 During our budget assumptions presentation, the Council asked for an explanation of state imposed levy, limits. Levy limits should not be confused with our mill rate or our growth in assessed valuation. The maximum tax dollars which the Citv can levy is based solely upon the amount of taxes which we actually levied in the preceding year. According to the 1988 property tax law, we may increase our 1989 levy by four (4) percent from our 1988 actual levy. In addition, we may further increase our levy by the greater of a) the percentage increase in our number of households during the past year or b) the percentage increase in our population.during the past year. Our increase in households exceeds our increase in population. According to the State, households numbers increased by about 3 112 percent last year. Therefore, our maximum 1989 levy may increase by about 7 1/2 percent from our 1988 actual levy. The 1988 property tax law further states that the 1990 maximum levy may increase by only 3 percent over the 1989 levy. Also, we are unsure of our population /household growth' rate will continue at present levels. Because of these factors and the risk of further restrictions on levy limits, we believe that.we should levy our.State allowed maximum for 1989. Did you know? When can cities change council members? Any city can by ordinance set salar- ies for its mayor and council members. (M.S. 415.11) However, a change in salaries may not take effect until after the next succeeding municipal election. This is the only method by which a statutory city may change the salaries of its mayor and council. Home rule charter cities, except for Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Duluth, may also change council salaries pursuant to this statute. Some charters also provide a proce- dure for changing council salaries. Pre- sumably, those cities can use either the statute or the charter procedure. Most statutory cities hold their elec- tions in even - numbered years; only about 10 percent of the statutory cities have adopted the odd -year election schedule. About one -third of the charter cities also hold their elections in November of even - numbered years. Thus for most cities, it will be impor- tant to review council salaries now so that they can make changes if neces- sary. If the council doesn't pass an ordinance changing council salaries before the November 8 election, the city won't have another opportunity to change salaries until after the 1990 election. To change salaries, the council must pass the ordinance and publish it in the official newspaper before November 8. If the council passes the ordinance after that date, the salary changes could not take effect until after the 1990 election. The ordinance should specify the date on which the revised salaries take effect. The most common practice is for the new salaries to take effect on January 1, when the new terms of office begin. However, the statute allows the ordinance to take effect any time after the election, so a change could take effect as soon as November 9 if the ordinance so provides. There is no provision in the statutes for a referendum on council salaries in statutory cities. However, if a home 40 Im salaries for mayors' and rule charter provides for referendum on ordinances, those referendum pro- visions do apply to an ordinance chang- ing council salaries. (Gould v. City of Bloomington, 394 NW2d 149, [Minn. App. 19861.) . The only statutory limit on mayor and council salaries is in M.S. 43A.17, subd. 19, which sets an upper limit of 95 percent of the governor's salary, has little practical effect. Nor do the statutes specify how council members are to receive pay. Some cities estab- lish a per -month or per -year lump sum, while others pay a certain amount per Peter Tritz . meeting, or for each day's service. Some cities use a combination of approaches; e.g., so much per month plus an additional amount for any spe- cial meetings. Note that unless the ordinance provides otherwise, a lump sum salary would cover all duties including special meetings. For comparison purposes, LMC's annual salary survey shows mayor and council salaries for Greater Minnesota cities. The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities collects salary data for metro -area cities. These publications are available from the League. ■ Minnesota municipal bond sales May and June 1988 Date Maturity Municipality Amount Type Rating NIR• 5-24 16 Champlin 1,200,000 G.O. Water Aaa 7.39 (MBIA) 5 -26 16 County of 245,000 Watershed . NR 7.49 Yellowstone Improvement 5 -26 16 Sleepy Eye 880,000 G.O. Storm Sewer Baa 1 7.25 5 -31 21 County of 1,865,000 G.O. Refunding Baa 7.78 . Cottonwood 5-31 17 Stewartville 385,000 G.O. Bonds A 7.41 6-7 19 Argyle 410,000 G.O. Refunding NR 7.83 6-7 19 Detroit Lakes 1,700,000 G.O. Library. A 7.45 6 -13 17 Inver Grove 2,050,000 G.O. Bonds. A 7.04 Heights 6 -13 19 — Hallock 1,945,000 G.O. Bonds Baa 7.58 6 -13 24 Barnesville 800,000 G.O. Impr. Rfdg.. NR 7.82 6 -14 18 State of 200,000,000 G.O. Bonds Aa Minnesota 6 -14 16 Staples 1,195,000 G.O. Improvement NR 7.28 6 -20 16 . White Bear Lake 535,000 G.0. Bonds Baa 1 7.27 6 -20 16 White Bear Lake 800,000 G.O. Bonds Baa 1 7.27 6 -20 11 Hastings 655,000 G.O. Improvement A 6.66 6 -20 20 Mahnomen 1,600,000 G.O. Refunding Ba 7.82 6 -20 16 Goodview 990,000 G.O. Improvement A 7.17 6 -20 13 Albertville 210,000 G.O. Bonds NR 7.32 6 -20 13 Albertville 790,000 G.O. Bonds NR 7.23 6 -20 16 South St. Paul 1,525,000 G.O. Improvement A 7.10 6 -21 19 State of Minnesota 5,500,000 G.O. Taxable AA 7.54 Various Purpose 6 -21 17 County of Kittson 2,245,000 G.O. Refunding Baa 7.56 6 -21 17 Mendota Heights 2,525,000 G.O. Improvement A 1 6.95 6 -27 17 ISD #423, 4,585,000 G.O. Bonds A 7.28 Hutchinson 6 -27 16 Cold Spring 650,000 G.O. Bonds Baa 6.94 6 -27 16" Cold Spring 420,000 G.O. Bonds Baa 7.34 6 -28 9 Dodge Center 135,000 G.O. Improvement NR 6.94 Minnesota Cities 1988- BUDGET STUDY To: Mayor & Council Members Ken Rosland, City Manager From: Eric Anderson, MIS Coordinatorc9k Subject: 1988 Budget Study Date: August 15,1988 The following is a comparison of selected services and salaries as per your request. Summary This study provides a comparison of Edina's operations with other Group V cities includ- ing: Bloomington, Brooklyn Park,. Burnsville, Coon Rapids, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Rich- field, Roseville and St. Louis Park. The Group V cities selected were included due to similarity in demographics, population; employee types and size, and proximity to Edina. There are three parts to the analysis: a. to compare Edina's 1988 budgeted dollar amounts for a few selected general fund services; b. to compare Edina's 1988 budgeted payroll amounts for the same services; and c. to compare Edina's 1988 comparable worth adjust- ments with other cities. The first two parts to the analysis were done on a per capita basis. Services selected were based on the similarity to Edina's operations (a service matrix of other services provided is included in the appendix).' Data is presented graphically for ease of analysis. Numerical data is available upon request. Results L Per Capita Analysis The results of the per capita budget/payroll analysis suggest that Edina ranks in the middle of the selected cities for budgeted dollars and payroll dollars. • Assessing Department (three of the selected Cities contract these responsiblities to the County) • Administration which includes Manager's Office, Personnel Department, Clerk's Office and Elections. Edina also includes the HRA Director under Administration where other cities include this director under the Planning Department or another funding source. 11 . i - 1988 Budget Study ` Page - 2 • Fire Department (includes Paramedic Service where applicable) • Police Department (includes Police Services, Animal Control and Civilian Defense) - • City Council/Ugislative (large variation due to differing Council sizes) • Engineering (includes Public Works Administration, Engineering and the City En- gineer) Two cities have differing organizational structures for Public Works and Parks which results in lower budget amounts for this area. • Street. Maintenance (includes typical maintenance programs such as street renova- tion, snow and ice removal, and normal maintenance) • Park & Recreation (includes park administration, recreation programs, park main- tenance and forestry) Two cities have differing organizational structures for Public Works and Parks which results in lower budget amounts for this area. Charts I and II under the Per Capita analysis in the appendix provide a summary of how Edina ranks in budget and payroll dollars for these selected areas. An average rank is also provided. For both areas, Edina's average rank is 5.8 on a 10 point scale. Each service is also graphed separately showing the differences among the cities( see per capita appendix). Density would also appear to be factor for land intensive services and deserves to be men- tioned as another method of comparison among the cities. Density is defined as the num- ber of people per square mile ( see ranking and graphs of these statistics in the basic service appendix). It would appear that the more dense the city, the more costly it is to provide ser- vices such as police and fire. A service comparison would be difficult to provide unless more cities were included in the analysis. A note should be made, however, that Edina ranks third among the selected cities in terms of density. H Salary Analysis -1988 Comparable Worth Effects The salary analysis is a continuation of the data Ceil Smith provided in 1987. This study took the 1988 dollars and graphically portrayed them according to the four functional per- sonnel areas: GeneraMchnical personnel, Technical Management personnel, Public Safety personnel, and Executive Management personnel. The four graphs located in the salary appendix show for selected positions how Edina's salaries compare to other Group V Cities in the study. They show four things: 1. the highest maximum salary for each position among the cities; 2. the lowest maximum salary for each position among the cities; 3. Edina's 1987 maximum salary for, each position; and 4. Edina's -1988 maximum salary for each position. For the majority of the selected positions, Edina ranks in the middle of the Group V cities which is consistent with the Council's directive. Salary data is also provided in the salary appendix. APPENDIX BASIC STATISTICS EDINA 3 7 3 w 1 z 5 BROOKLYN PARK o 5 6 BURNSVILLE 4 4 8 COON RAPIDS 7 - 6 7 MINNETONKA 8 3 9 PLYMOUTH 5. 1 10 RICHFIELD 9 10 1 ROSEVILLE 10 8 z .ST. LOUIS PARK ] 9 2 a a p CA EDINA 3 7 3 BLOOMINGTON 1 2 5 BROOKLYN PARK 2 5 6 BURNSVILLE 4 4 8 COON RAPIDS 7 - 6 7 MINNETONKA 8 3 9 PLYMOUTH 5. 1 10 RICHFIELD 9 10 1 ROSEVILLE 10 8 4 .ST. LOUIS PARK 6 9 2 DENSITY = POPULATION • / SQUARE MILES CITIES BLOOMINGTON BROOKLYN PARK EDINA BURNSVILLE PLYMOUTH. ST. LOUIS PARK COON RAPIDS MINNETONKA RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE BASIC STATISTICS POPULATION 52400 45600 ® 44300 043800 ® 42900 042900 1,38700 37000 35000 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 POPULATION (ESTIMATE) CITIES PLYMOUTH BLOOMINGTON MINNETONKA BURNSVILLE BROOKLYN PARK COON RAPIDS EDINA ROSEVILLE ST.LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD BASIC STATISTICS SQUARE MILES =16 .13.75 10.7 7.5 23 N 39.5 128 127 26 42 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 SQUARE MILES Persons Per Square Mile 6000 5500 5000 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Basic Statistics Density by City A B C D E F G H I J City City A. Richfield B. St. Louis Park C. Edina D. Roseville E. Bloomington F. Brooklyn Park G. Coon Rapids H. Burnsville I. Minnetonka J. Plymouth SER VICE MATRIX CITY SERVICES . y a ►iii � w U W y 0 W 0 a. z a o z Q o a a cn a W C07 y a y y W a EDINA BLOOMINGTON BROOKLYN PK. BURNSVILLE COON RAPIDS * * * MINNETONKA PLYMOUTH RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE ST.LOUIS PARK * PER CAPITA ANALYS I S Chart I RANK BY PER CAPITA BUDGET A z c� z z O F a F z_ 0 Q U U w z ] O 0 L14 z w W z z w w U a� z w F z F w w x z 0 F w x U w P4 zd x w x NUM;: 1 - HIGHEST BUDGET/10 - LOWEST BUDGET • - NO ASSESSING DEPARTMENT I 4 3 4 7 9 5 3 7 5.8 (6) NGTON 1 1 5 6 3 1 3 5 8 3.7 (1) N PARK 8 7 9 10 6 2 1 4 9 6.2 (7) ILLE 2 * 1 1 4 8 7 10 2 4.4 (5) APIDS ' I6 7 8 4 5 9 3 10 9 10 ONKA 4 3 7 7 5 5 2 1 1 3.8 (2) TH 9 5 10 8 8 10 9 2 5 7.3 (9) LD 3 * 2 3 1 6 8 6 3 4.2 (3) LE 10 * 8 - 9 10 7 6 7 4 7.5 (10) ST. LOUIS PARK 5 2 6 2 24 4 8 6 4.3 (4) NUM;: 1 - HIGHEST BUDGET/10 - LOWEST BUDGET • - NO ASSESSING DEPARTMENT I CHART II PAYROLL BUDGET RANK BY FUNCTION W u z o z z wo z z u W z a w z u z LLJ LLI a U w �¢ Q Mollie.. I Not] 961618 1 WE" Kole 5 ►� ►► e►.: ����i������!� ®tom ' � immoMMIMMEN J NOTE: 1 - HIGHEST BUDGET /10 - LOWEST BUDGET - - NO ASSESSING DEPARTMENT CITIES BLOOMINGTON BURNSVILLE RICHFIELD MINNETONKA ST. LOUIS PARK EDINA COON RAPIDS BROOKLYN PARK PLYMOUTH ROSEVILLE GENERAL FUND $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 340.43 331.82 285.23 281.99 _ 270.58 _ 260.85 _ 260.10 0229.92 1218.49 198.42 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 $ PER CAPITA CITIES BLOOMINGTON ST.LOUIS PARK MINNETONKA EDINA PLYMOUTH BROOKLYN PARK COON RAPIDS ROSEVILLE * RICHFIELD * BURNSVILLE * ASSESSING BUDGET PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 2.31 4.34 N6.28 15.95 5.64 8.36 8.02 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $ PER CAPITA * - COUNTY HANDLES ASSESSING RESPONSIBILITIES CITIES BLOOMINGTON ST. LOUIS PARK MINNETONKA EDINA PLYMOUTH BROOKLYN PARK COON RAPIDS RICHFIELD * ROSEVILLE * BURNSVILLE * ASSESSING PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 2.11 3.73 3.59 ■ 5.28 4.56 N 7.18 6.66 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 $ PER CAPITA * - COUNTY HANDLES ASSESSING RESPONSIBILITIES CITIES BURNSVILLE RICHFIELD EDINA * COON RAPIDS BLOOMINGTON ST. LOUIS PARK MINNETONKA ROSEVILLE BROOKLYN PARK PLYMOUTH ADMINISTRATION BUDGET $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 17.15 6.95 6.67 = 13.73 .12.73 112.34 112.17 11.15 N 18.44 16.76 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 $ PER CAPITA * - INCLUDES HRA SERVICES (OTHERS BUDGET SEPARATELY) ADMINISTRATION INCLUDES: MANAGER'S OFFICE PERSONNEL CLERK'S OFFICE ELECTIONS CITIES RICHFIELD BURNSVILLE ST.LOUIS PARK EDINA * MINNETONKA COON RAPIDS ROSEVILLE BROOKLYN IOARK PLYMOUTH BLOOMINGTON ADMINISTRATION PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 8.61 7.91 - 7.88 -7.17 06.32 5.33 4.29 3.31 = 12.47 10.97 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 $ PER CAPITA * - INCLUDES HRA SERVICES (OTHERS BUDGET SEPARATELY) ADMINISTRATION INCLUDES: MANAGER'S OFFICE PERSONNEL CLERK'S OFFICE ELECTIONS CITIES BURNSVILLE * ST.LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD EDINA * COON RAPIDS BLOOMINGTON MINNETONKA PLYMOUTH ROSEVILLE BROOKLYN PARK FIRE BUDGET $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES E 16.58 13.92 12.90 7.34 40 32.07 44.531 42.06 .42.04 39.22 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 $ PER CAPITA * - INCLUDES PARAMEDIC SERVICE CITIES ST. LOUIS PARK BURNSVILLE * RICHFIELD EDINA * COON RAPIDS BLOOMINGTON MINNETONKA ROSEVILLE PLYMOUTH BROOKLYN PARK FIRE PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 21.74 10.15 M 6.86 15.58 3.43 .31.04 28.59 N39.16 138.62 36.90 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 $ PER CAPITA * - INCLUDES PARAMEDIC SERVICE CITIES RICHFIELD ST.LOUIS PARK BLOOMINGTON BURNSVILLE MINNETONKA BROOKLYN PARK EDINA PLYMOUTH COON RAPIDS ROSEVILLE POLICE BUDGET $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 90.13 88.37 82.02 78.16 77.64 - 68.02 . 65.68 .61.92 J60.8 55.94 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $ PER CAPITA CITIES ST.LOUIS PARK RICHFIELD BLOOMINGTON BURNSVILLE MINNETONKA COON RAPIDS BROOKLYN PARK EDINA ROSEVILLE PLYMOUTH POLICE PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 73.11 70.43 67.69 66.46 62.51 60.80 _ 53.80 - 50.54 .48.91 39.08 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PER CAPITA POLICE INCLUDES: POLICE SERVICES ANIMAL CONTROL CIVILIAN DEFENSE COUNCIL BUDGET $ PER CAPITA' FOR GROUP V CITIES CITIES BLOOMINGTON ,N BROOKLYN PARK COON RAPIDS ST. LOUIS PARK MINNETONKA RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE BURNSVILLE EDINA PLYMOUTH 1 2 3 4 5 $ PER CAPITA CITIES COON RAPIDS BLOOMINGTON ST. LOUIS PARK BROOKLYN PARK MINNETONKA RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE PLYMOUTH BURNSVILLE EDINA COUNCIL PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES I9emI _.88 - .77 ..66 1.57 .52 1 1.31 1.29 1.23 2.01 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 $ PER CAPITA CITIES BROOKLYN PARK MINNETONKA BLOOMINGTON ST. LOUIS PARK EDINA ROSEVILLE BURNSVILLE RICHFIELD * PLYMOUTH COON RAPIDS ENGINEERING BUDGET $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 6.02 5.94 5.92 4.53 - 14.53 - 13.39 - 12.87 1 10.51 9.56 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 $ PER CAPITA * - DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENGINEERING INCLUDES: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING CITIES BROOKLYN PARK MINNETONKA BLOOMINGTON ST. LOUIS PARK ROSEVILLE EDINA BURNSVILLE COON RAPIDS * RICHFIELD * PLYMOUTH ENGINEERING PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES - 5.29 3.83 3.71 3.54 M9.05 8.09 - 14.48 ■ 12.60 1 11.45 10.94 0 4 8 12 16 20 $ PER CAPITA * - DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ENGINEERING INCLUDES: PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING CITIES MINNETONKA PLYMOUTH EDINA BROOKLYN PARK BLOOMINGTON RICHFIELD * ROSEVILLE ST. LOUIS PARK COON RAPIDS * BURNSVILLE + STREET MAINTENANCE $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 3 7.0 9 33.66 31.10 29.12 _ 26.67 .21.70 21.35 119.44 18.13 0 10 20 30 $ PER CAPITA * DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE + EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE NOT INCLUDED 43.251 40 50 STREET MAINTENANCE INCLUDES: STREET RENOVATION SNOW & ICE REMOVAL STREET SWEEPING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET MAINTENANCE PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES CITIES MINNETONKA EDINA BLOOMINGTON BROOKLYN PARK ROSEVILLE ST.LOUIS PARK COON RAPIDS * PLYMOUTH RICHFIELD BURNSVILLE 15.13 12.90 _ 11.81 ■ 10.23 19.41 19.37 1 8.60 8.39 8.32 WORMOV 0 4 8 12 16 20 $ PER CAPITA * — Different Organizational Structure Street Maintenance includes: Street Renovation Snow & Ice Removal Street Sweeping General Maintenance Equipment Replacement CITIES MINNETONKA BURNSVILLE RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE PLYMOUTH ST.LOUIS PARK EDINA BLOOMINGTON BROOKLYN PARK COON RAPIDS PARK & REC BUDGET $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES 47.36 45.33 _ 40.76 _ 38.82 _ 38.53 36.59 .33.28 .33.25 1,32.67 29.94 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 $ PER CAPITA * - DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE PARK & RECREATION INCLUDES: PARK ADMINISTRATION RECREATION PROGRAMS PARK MAINTENANCE (ONLY GENERAL FUND PROGRAMS) CITIES RICHFIELD ROSEVILLE BROOKLYN PARK MINNETONKA BLOOMINGTON BURNSVILLE ST. LOUIS PARK EDINA PLYMOUTH COON RAPIDS PARK & REC PAYROLL $ PER CAPITA FOR GROUP V CITIES -26.35 ■ 23.68 22.00 20.08 19.83 S 19.62 118.33 17.59 16.34 37.08 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 $ PER CAPITA * - DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE PARK & RECREATION INCLUDES: PARK ADMINISTRATION RECREATION PROGRAMS PARK MAINTENANCE (ONLY GENERAL FUND PROGRAMS) SALARY ANALYSIS a GENERAL /TECHNICAL PERSONNEL GROUP V CITIES SALARIES BY JOB TYPE DOLLARS 30000 — 25000 20000 15000 10000 — 5000 — 1 2 • HIGHEST CITY >> "t,,-..,,� - -. 3 4 5 6 7 JOB TYPES --W- EDINA 1988 COMP. WORTH ADJUSTMENTS •Is d•4 LOWEST CITY —A— EDINA 1987 Job types 1. PBX Operator 2. Clerk/ Typist 3. Accounting Clerk 4. Custodian 5. Sr. Clerk /Typist 6. Sr. Accounting Clerk 7. Secretary TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT GROUP V CITIES MAaXI1�IUM SALARIES BY JOB TYPE DOLLARS 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 l.��s'�yaa��' ',�,s• 'a a• ;paps as 1 2 3 4 JOB TYPES 5 6 7 HIGHEST CITY -A— EDINA 1988 COMP. WORTH ADJUSTMENT { LOWEST CITY -i�r- EDINA 1987 Job Type 1. Engineering Aide III 2. Engineering Aide IV 3. Planner 4. Recreation Supervisor 5. Appraisor 6. Inspector 7. Foreman POLICE /FIRE PERSONNEL GROUP V CITIES MAXIMUM SALARIES BY JOB TYPE DOLLARS 80000 70000 60000 50000 391919I0 30000 20000 10000 1 2 3 4 5 JOB TYPES 6 7 8 HIGHEST CITY -�- EDINA 1988 COMP. WORTH ADJUSTMENT • LOWEST CITY EDINA 1987 Job Types 1. Dispatcher 2. Firefighter 3. Police Officer 4. Police Sergeant 5. Police Lieutenant 6. Police Captain 7. Fire Chief 8. Police Chief EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT GROUP V CITIES MAXIMUM SALARIES BY JOB TYPE DOLLARS 85000 80000 75000 70000 65000 60000 55000 50000 45000 40000 35000 30000 25000 20000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOB TYPES HIGHEST CITY --W- EDINA 1988 COMP. WORTH ADJUSTMENT LOWEST CITY --A— EDINA 1987 Job Type 1. Chief inspector 2. Liquor Store Manager 3. Assistant Finance Director 4. City Clerk 5. Assessor 6. Assistant City Manager 7. Senior Planner 8. Finance Director 9. City Manager 10- Aug -88 GENERAL /TECHNICAL SALARIES BY GROUP V CITIES - 1988 GROUP V PBX - CLERK/ ACCOUNTING SR. CLERK SR.A000UNT CITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OPERATOR RANK TYPIST RANK CLERK RANK CUSTODIAN RANK TYPIST RANK CLERK RANK SECRETARY RANK BLOOMINGTON 17,820 8 20,712 _ 3 19,320 9 21,252 9 BROOKLYN PARK 18,612 5 20,532 4 22,212 4 22,261 7 23,100 7 BURNSVILLE 18,588 6 20,676 4 19,524 8 23,856 5 23,856 6 COON RAPIDS 20,628 2 20,628 3 26,395 1 27,624 1 29,280 1 31,032 1 MINNETONKA 16,332 9 17,021 6 18,456 10 18,456 8 20,904 10 RICHFIELD 19,656 3 19,488 5 21,694 4 21,696 5 23,940 4 27,876 3 ROSEVILLE 18,720 4 24,648 3 21,084 6 22,380 6 22,836 8 ST.LOUIS PARK 18,216 7 20,400 5 21,403 5 20,400 7 25,824 2 24,336 5 PLYMOUTH 23,088 1 23,088 1 23,088 1 25,536 2 28,260 2 EDINA 19,656 3 20,628 2 22,752 2 24,960 2 24,960 3 24,960 3 24,960 4 MEAN SALARY- 19,132 21,055 21,343 22,687 22,081 23,870 24,841 RANK i i 3/10 I 2/5 2/5 2/6 3/10 3/8' 4/10 10- Aug -88 TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT SALARIES BY GROUP V CITIES - 1988 GROUP V ENGINEER ENGINEER RECREATION CITIES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AIDE III RANK AID IV RANK PLANNER RANK SUPERVISOR RANK APPRAISOR RANK INSPECTOR RANK FOREMAN RANK BLOOMINGTON 26,712 8 32,280 9 42,000 1 34,680 3 35,004 6 42,000 -2 BROOKLYN PARK 29,256 5 38,412 4 34,920 7 41,556 4 BURNSVILLE 29,508 4 36,576 4 36,876 7 35,040 5 36,876 7 COON RAPIDS 39,180 2 41,532 1 44,028 1 44,028 1 49,476 1 MINNETONKA 26,772 7 33,396 7 29,532 6 33,504 9 31,800 5 31,800 10 35,448 8 RICHFIELD 35,172 6 30,768 4 37.,812 6 33,804 9 35,176 9 ROSEVILLE 31,356 2 38,604 3 33,600 8 35,304 4 ST.LOUIS PARK 28,968 6 36,960 3 30,024 5 39,420 3 32,568 4 36,960 2 41,964 3 PLYMOUTH 34,644 1 35,964 5 34,664 3 39,936 2 34,644 8 39,936 5 EDINA 29,640 3 40,248 1 38,376 2 38,376 5 40,248 2 36,048 3 38,376 6 MEAN SALARY 29,607 36,487 34,149 37,771 36,665 35,755 40,090 RANK 3/8 1/9 2/6 5/9 2/5 3110 6/9 10- Aug -88 PUBLIC SAFETY SALARIES BY GROUP V CITIES - 1988 GROUP V POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE CITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIREFIGHTER RANK FIRE CHIEF RANK DISPATCH RANK OFFICER RANK SERGEANT RANK LIEUTENANT RANK CAPTAIN RANK CHIEF RANK BLOOMINGTON 21,640 5 36,228 1 38,736 7 42,540 5 45,924 6 75,600 1 BROOKLYN PARK 53,700 5 33,034 5 38,052 8 60,400 5 BURNSVILLE 32,616 5 56,100 4 27,504 1 32,256 7 39,792 6 47,016 1 58,100 8 COON RAPIDS 33,600 2 59,000 2 31,728 10 37,044 9 49,476 3 58,900 7 MINNETONKA 48,500 6 19,894 6 32,760 6 40,008 5 45,360 7 57,900 9 RICHFIELD 35,424 1, 48,300 7 23,940 4 31,968 8 41,760 3 44,544 4 47,736 5 61,700 4 ROSEVILLE 31,956 9 36,132 10 52,800 2 57,500 10 ST.LOUIS PARK 33,432 3 56,500 3 24,336 3 33,516 3 41,964 2 45,744 3 64,500 1 64,500 3 PLYMOUTH 45,500 8 35,760 2 41,160 4 39,936 6 59,000 6 EDINA 33,093 4 64,900 .1 25,680. 2 33,492 4 43,188 1 46,176 2 49,344 4 64,900 2 MEAN SALARY 33,633 54,063 23,832 33,270 39,784 44,326 .50,734 61,850 RANK 4/5 1/8 2/6 4/10 1 /10 2/6 4/7 2/10 10- Aug -88 r 1 EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT SALARIES BY GROUP V CITIES - 1988 GROUP V CHIEF LIQ. STORE ASST.FINANCE CITY ASST.CITY SENIOR FINANCE CITY CITIES ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------=--- INSPECTOR RANK MANAGER RANK DIRECTOR RANK CLERK RANK ASSESSOR RANK MANAGER RANK PLANNER RANK DIRECTOR RANK MANAGER BLOOMINGTON 54,600 1 55,200 2 55,200 1 55,200 5 55,200 6 75,600 1 77,500 3 BROOKLYN PARK 41,600 6 46,764 3 30,936 8 48,800 4 48,636 4 48,636 9 68,000 2 70,500 6 BURNSVILLE 42,900 3 44,508 3 56,160 4 58,000 7 64,400 9 COON RAPIDS 46,700 2 49,476 2 55,572 1 52,400 2 62,448 1 55,572 5 66,200 3 60,000 10 MINNETONKA 39,700 8 38,292 8 45,100 7 43,464 9 50,208 7 53,600, 9 69,600 7 RICHFIELD 42,700 4 54,600 1 37,812 6 62,160 2 61,656 2 48,300 10 67,400 8 ROSEVILLE 40,800 7 .40,800 6 52,800 _ 7 57,500 8 80,300 1 ST.LOUIS PARR 42,000 5 45,732 4 41,964 4 45,700 5 56,496 4 64,512 1 64,500 5 79,400 2 PLYMOUTH 39,900 9 52,260 2 39,936 7 39,936 5 45,500 6 53,004 6 58,980 3 59,000 6 75,700 4 EDINA 49,900 1 49,900 3 41,496 5 36,456 7 49,900 3 58,404 3 49,920 8 64,900 4 75,400 5 MEAN SALARY 42,911 52,253 44,637 42,798 48,943 54,735 55,649 61,560 72,020 RANK 1/9 1/3 518 7/8 3/7 3/9 8/9 4/10 5/10 r 1 T (" REVISED BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS AUGUST. 15, 1988 r 1 9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S - P R O P O S E D E X P E N D I T U R E S- ASSUMP ACTUAL BUDGETED % PROPOSED 1987 1988 INCRSE 1989 SALARIES 5,722,-980 6,218,325 4.00% 6,467,058 CONTRACTUAL SVCS. 1,656,195 1,587,793 3.00% 1,635,427 COMMODITIES 537,129 628,179 3.00% 647,024 CENTRAL SERVICES 2,469,919 2,488,020 3.00% 21562,661 EQUIPMENT 871,805 952,489 3.00% 981,064 NEW PROGRAMS 324.610 11,258,028 11,874,806 6.26$ 12,617,843 % INCREASE BUDGET 89 6.26% SCENARIO USED 1 1.9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S - P R.0 P O S E D R E V E N U E S- ASSUMPTION REVENUES ACTUAL BUDGETED $ PROPOSED 1987 1988 INCREASE 1989 TAXES 7,988,324 8,599,143 9,197,648. LICENSES.& PERMITS 710,282 565,200 6.00% 599,112: FEES & CHARGES 1,940,998 1,843,666 6.00% 1,954,286 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1,111,040 866,797 .00% 866..797 11,750,644 11,874,806 6.26% 12,617,843 ASSESSED VALUE 722,232,808 765,126,667 841,639,334 LESS: FISCAL DISPARITIES(42,201,490) (47,102,814) (49,457,955) INCRIIMENT VALUE (16,529,645) (23,333,7881 (32,000,000) TOTAL 663,501,673 694,690,065 760,181,379 im 1 9 8 9. B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S - E X'P E N D I T U R E D I S T R I B U T I O N- ACTUAL BUDGETED PROPOSED 1987 1988 1989 SALARIES - - -- 50.83$ 52.37% 51.25% CONTRACTUAL.SVCS. 14.71% 13.37% 12.96% COMMODITIES 4.77$ 5.29$ 5.13% CENTRAL SERVICES 21.94% 20.95$ 20.31$ EQUIPMENT 7.74% 8.02% 7.78% NEW PROGRAMS 2.57% 100.00% 100.00$ 100.00% 1 9 8 9 B II D G E T A S S II M P T I O N S — R E V.E N II E D I S T R I B II T I O N— REVENUES ACTUAL BUDGETED PROPOSED. -- 1987 1988 1989 TAXES 67.98$ 72.42$ 72.89$ LICENSES PERMITS 6.04$ 4.76% 4.75% FEES & CHARGES 16.52$ 15.53% 15.49% INTERGOVT AID 9.46$ 7.30% 6.87$ 100.00$ 100.00% 100.00$ a] 1 -989 BUDGET ASSUMPTIONS -SUMMARY- ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET. 1987 1988 1989 TOTAL REVENUES 11,750,644 11,8740,806 12,617,843. TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,258,028 11,874,806, 12,6171843 TAX DOLLARS 7,966,499 8,569,143 9,172,648 TAX DOLLAR INCRSE 484,967 602,644 573,505 $ INCREASE TAX $ 6.50% 7.56 %. 7.04$-. BELOW LEVY LIMIT 46,431 KILL RATE 11.99 12.34 1 9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N'S EFFECTS ON RESIDENTIAL HOMES APPROXIMATE 1987 CITY TAXES APPROXIMATE 1988 CITY TAXES 1987 ESTIMATED 1987 1988 DIFFERENCE MARKET VALUE TAXES TAXES 87 -88 $144,000 $324 $150,000 - $240,000 $646 $250,000 $672 $25 $480,000 $1,452 $500,000 $1,504 $52 COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL $480,000 $2,474 $500,000 $2,652 $178 ESTIMATED 1989.TAXES 1989 EST. 1989 DIFFERENCE .. MKT. VALUE TAXES 88 -89 $162,000 $359 $20 TAX.BUDGET $9,172,648 $270,000 $721 $49 TAX CAPACITY 90,320,000 $540,000.- $1,625 $121 TAX CAP. RAT 10.2% COMMERCIAL $540,000 $2,879 $227 m 1 9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S - P R O P O S E D N E W P R O G R A M S - NEW PROGRAMS -89 SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 ADJUSTMENTS 1 CENTENNIAL ADJUST. (25,000) (25,000) (25,000) 2 STORM DRAINAGE.ADJ (79,700) (79,700) (79,700) 3 ELECTION ADJUST. (501000) (50,000) (50,000) RECYCLING 4 OPTION 1 0 0 56,540 5 OPTION 2 0 162,242 0 6 OPTION 3 123,610 0 0 GENERAL 7 COMP WORTH PROGRAM 75,000 75,000 0 8 HOSPITALIZATION 50,000 50,000 0 9 CAPTL.PLN. CONTRIB 45,000 52,000 0 10 YINANCE -LOGIS INC. 6,000 6,000 0 11 CENT.SVC.- COMP EQ 2,500 -2,500 0 12 SHARED LASER PRINT 2,500 2,500 0 PAGE 1 SUBTOTAL 149.910 195,542 (98.160) 1%9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S -,P R O P-0 S E D N E W P R 0 G R A M S- PAGE - 2 SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 GENERAL CONT'D 13 HUMAN RELATIONS -SH 4,000 4,000 0 14 PLANNING - COMPUTER 0 2,000 0 15 MERIT PROGRAM 0 50,000 0 PUBLIC WORKS 16 ENGINEER EQUIP. 15,000 15,000. 0 INSPECTIONS 17 INSPECTIONS EQUIP. 8,000 8,000 0 FIRE 18 COMPRESSOR 22,000 22,000 0 19 NEW 1/4 EMPLOYEE 4,000 10,000 0 20 PERA VOLUNTEERS 6,000 6,000 0 21 HAZMAT COMPUTER 3,000 3,000 0 22 OVERTIME INCREASE 25.000 50.000 0 PAGE 2 SUBTOTAL 83.000 114,000 0 n 30 PARKS JANITOR 14,500 14,500 0 31 PARK PATROL 0 24,000 0 32 SENIOR CITIZENS ? ? ? TOTAL'NEW PROGRAMS 324,610 482,242 (98,160) 1 9 8 9 B U D G E T A S S U M P T I O N S = P R O P O S E D N E W P R 0 G R A K S- PAGE - 3 SCENARIO 1 SCENARIO 2 SCENARIO 3 POLICE 23 OVERTIME INCREASE.- 15,000 32,000 0 24 SERVICE CONTRACT 10,000 10,000 0 25 SEVERANCE INCRSE 10,000 20,000 0 26 CLERICAL 19,200 19,200 0 27 COMMUNICATIONS 15,000 15,000 0 28 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 8,000 8,000 0 29 OFFICER 0 30,000 0 30 PARKS JANITOR 14,500 14,500 0 31 PARK PATROL 0 24,000 0 32 SENIOR CITIZENS ? ? ? TOTAL'NEW PROGRAMS 324,610 482,242 (98,160) TO: KEN ROSLAND CITY MANAGER FROM: CEIL SMITH ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: PROPOSED SALARY INCREASE - 1989 DATE: AUGUST 15, 1988 At the last City Council Meeting on August 1, 1988, the Council requested the following information regarding salary adjustments in the Cities to which we usually compare ourselves. I have also included an article from the Bureau of National Affairs that discusses salary adjustments in the private sector on a national basis. Additionally, I have provided some information about the consumer price index. lu SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR METRO AREA 1988. 1989 PROPOSED BLOOMINGTON 3.3 4.0 BROOKLYN CENTER 4.0 4.0 EDINA 4.0 .4.0 COON RAPIDS 3.0 4.0 ST. LOUIS PARK 4.0 3:0 MINNETONKA 3.5 3.5 BURNSVILLE 3.9 4.0 PLYMOUTH 3.3 3.5 RICHFIELD 4.0 4.0 ROSEVILLE 3.5 4.0. 1988 Overall metro survey salary, adjustments up 4.1 %. Suburbs over 10,000 which included Edina up 4.1% 1988' CPI Nationwide 4/87 - 4/88, 3.7 %. Minneapolis - St. Paul 1/87 - 1/88, 4.5% CPI for Minneapolis /St Paul 1/88 - 7/1/88 will be available.August 23, 1988. Vol. 3, No. 13 Health Care Highlights Fewer than two-thirds of employees in small, rural firms are covered by employer - provided health insurance plans, compared with over 80 percent of workers nationwide and 95 percent in medium and large firms, according to a survey by the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association. The survey covers 822 firms with 60 or fewer workers in seven states: Colora- do, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Mis- sissippi, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. Nationally, the survey shows, about 66 percent of the non - elderly employed population receives health insurance coverage through a company -spon- sored plan. By comparison, only two of the surveyed states, Colorado and Kansas, have employer - provided cover- age rates that meet or exceed the na- tional rate. Companies with fewer than 10 employees account for 88 per- cent of the firms without coverage and 46 percent of the non - covered workers. Firms with fewer than five workers have the lowest rates of employee cov- erage — 36 percent vs. 59 percent in companies with five to nine employees. The survey also notes that over half (57 percent) of covered employees in small, rural firms pay all or part of the premiums for their coverage, com- pared with 43 percent of covered work- ers nationwide. (NRECA, 1800 Mass. Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C.) • i i In protest of mandated health care legislation (S 1265/HR 2508), small business owners hand over 13,000 peti- tions to Sen. Orrin Hatch (R- Utah). Noting that small employers are con- cerned about survival, Hatch says a better approach would be to find ways to raise the money needed for health care directly, such as expanding exist- ing federal programs. He also proposes using additional funds for job training, so that uninsured workers can get bet- ter paying jobs and afford coverage. '88 Pay Predictions: Salaried Workers Wage Increases Pay increases for salaried employees are projected to average 5 percent in both 1988 and 1989, according to the Conference Board's annual private - sector salary survey. The survey covers 1,830 firms in the manufacturing, util- ities, insurance, commercial banking, and trade sectors. In 1988, exempt workers' median pay increases are expected to range from 4.5.percent in the utilities indus- try to 5.8 percent in the insurance industry, the survey shows. Projected salary hikes for exempt workers in other surveyed industries include 4.8 percent in manufacturing, and 5 per- cent in both commercial banking and trade. ''- Averaging 4.8 percent, non -exempt workers' overall pay increases in 1988 are expected to be less than those for :exempt (5 percent) and executive em- lVoyees (5.4 percent), the Conference June 27, 1988 Board notes. By industry, projected increases for non - exempt workers in- clude 4.2 percent for utilities, 4.6 per- cent for manufacturers, 5 percent for both commercial banking and trade, and 5.7 percent for insurance. Salary increases for executives in 1988 are expected to average 5.4 per- cent, and range from 5.2 percent in manufacturing and utilities firms to 6.3 percent in insurance companies. In both the trade and commercial bank- ing industries, pay increases are pro- jected to average 5.3 percent for executives. The survey also finds that employ- ees receive lump -sum payments in lieu of salary increases in 8 percent of the surveyed companies. These payments currently average 4 percent of employ- ees' base salary. (The Conference Board, 845 Third Ave., Now York, N.Y. 10022) Pay Strategies: Incentive Compensation A majority of workers would rather be paid on a straight salary basis, but a sizable minority would give up the security of a regular paycheck for the chance to earn more money based on their performance or that of their company, according to a nationwide survey by R.H. Bruskin Associates of New Brunswick, N.J. The survey, which covers 678 full- and part -time employees, appears in a new BNA report on changing pay practices. Sixty -three percent of the surveyed workers say that they prefer a straight wage or salary over any type of incentive compensation. However, 22 percent of the employees say that they would prefer to be paid on an individual incentive basis, while 12 percent would be willing to opt for an incentive plan based on overall company performance. Only 21 percent of the respondents say they currently receive incentive pay. Of the 366 white - collar workers surveyed, 56 percent say they prefer straight wages, compared with 72 percent of the 312 blue-collar respon- dents. More white - collar than blue- collar workers prefer incentive pay, both on an individual (26 percent vs. 17 percent) and company -wide (15 percent vs. 8 percent) basis. (Changing Pay Practices. New Developments in Employee Compensation; BNA Customer Service Center, 9435 Key West Ave., Rockville, Md. 20850; 800 -372 -1033) Copyright ® 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Page 73 Employment G Communication Across the Cultural Gaps: Coping With Differences Within a Diverse Workforce Foreign -born employees' ability to perform their jobs effectively depends on management and co-workers' sensi- tivity to cultural differences, states Sondra Thiederman, a San • Diego- based trainer specializing in cross -cul- tural communication. Noting that the workplace attitudes of many foreign - born employees "differ radically" from their U.S. counterparts, Thieder- man explains how employers can bridge cultural gaps and help foreign - born employees perform well in their jobs. Attitudes and Awareness Foreign -born employees may be re- luctant to take individual initiative be- cause of their strong respect for au- thority and fear of failure, points out Thiederman. Moreover, foreign -born workers may feign understanding of instructions rather than ask that they be repeated. Adding to these difficul- VDT Law Enacted Employers in Suffolk County, N.Y., will be required to finance eye -care exams and corrective lenses for video display terminal operators, under a law approved by the county legisla- ture. Passed over the veto of Suffolk's chief executive, the law covers employ- ers with 20 or more terminals and employees who spend at least 26 hours per week using VDTs. Under the new law, employers must pay 80 percent of the cost of annual eye examinations and lenses that work- ers need as a result of using VDTs. In addition, employers must train opera- tors about potential health hazards of VDTs, allow for 15- minute alternative work breaks every three hours, and equip VDT work stations with special lighting and ergonomic furniture. Currently employed VDT operators must receive eye examinations within 90 days of the law's effective date. Employers must comply with other provisions of the law six months after it takes effect. Work station require- ments apply only to equipment ob- tained after Jan. 1, 1990. ties is the common misconception on the part of American workers that employees who speak English with a heavy accent are uneducated or under- stand English as poorly as they speak it. Many of these cultural barriers may be overcome through education and understanding, Thiederman maintains. She provides the following tips for pav- ing foreign -born employees' way to better job performance: 10* Explain that taking initiative is a sign of loyalty and dedication. In addition, praise employees when they act independently, even when they make mistakes, to encourage them to try again. 10, Outline specifically the tasks that require direction and those that may be performed independently. t Become aware of how employees indicate that they may not have under- stood your instructions. Tip-offs in- Garnishment of Benefits Creditors of employees who partici- pate in an employee welfare benefits plan covered by the Employee Retire- ment Income Security Act may gar- nish those benefits to satisfy their claims against fund participants, the U.S. Supreme Court decides. The case arose when a collection agency sued the trustees of a joint union /employer vacation fund in an attempt to garnish benefits payable to the employees. The Georgia supreme court held that the state law exempt- ing ERISA -covered plan benefits from garnishment was itself preempted by the act, and that ERISA did not pre- clude creditors from garnishing worker benefits under an ERISA -covered plan. The Supreme Court finds that ERISA preempts Georgia state law to the extent that the state's garnishment law exempted benefits payable under an ERISA -covered plan. However, the Court notes, ERISA does not preempt Georgia's entire garnishment proce- dure. (Mackey' v. Lanier, U.S. SupCt, No. 86 -1387, 6/17/88) June 27, 1988 clude repeated nodding and smiling, distracted facial expressions, and lack of questions. . 0' Speak in the employees' cultural language. Explain, for example, that if a task is not completed properly, man- agement, too,.will "lose face." 10, Emphasize to foreign -born work- ers to speak slowly and clearly, to start over if they are not understood, and to pay attention to common errors of pronunciation. 11" Instruct the rest of the staff to be patient without patronizing their foreign -born co-workers. Ask employ- ees to speak distinctly and avoid slang. In addition, .suggest that employees augment their speech with non - verbal methods of communicating, and follow up with written memos any conversa- tions that may have been unclear. (Management World, Vol. 17, No. 3, AMS, 4622 Street Road, Trevose, Pa. 10947) Smoking Policy Pointers Employers that approach workplace smoking as a health and safety issue, rather than as a question of smokers' "rights," will have an easier time im- plementing a smoking policy, asserts John Pinney, executive director of the Institute for the Study of Smoking Behavior and Policy at Harvard University. Addressing a seminar on workplace smoking, sponsored by US Healthcare and held in Newton, Mass., Pinney says that, at the very least, every com- pany should have an "unequivocal written policy" designed to protect non - smokers to "the maximum extent possible." He suggests that employers: IN, Involve workers in formulating the policy. Instituting a smoking policy "requires a degree of understanding and compassion" for employees who do smoke, he notes. 10- Treat violations of the policy with progressive discipline, applying leniency for "inadvertent lapses." 10, Give several months' advance notice before the policy becomes effective. Employment Guide (ISBN 0- 87179 - 508 -6) newsletter is published bi- weekly by The Bureau of National Affairs. Inc., 1231 25th St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037 -1197 for $296.00 per year. Second Class postage paid at Washington. D.C. and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: send address changes to Employment Guide. The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc., P.O. Box 40949. Washington. D.C. 20016-0949. Page 74 Copyright ® 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. c c ' Employment G voyeurism ... Jeepers Peepers The case discussion below is one of a regular series designed to illustrate the handling of everyday problems in human relations. The names and dialogue are fictitious. Users may find these discussions helpful in supervisory training. .. "You've got to give me another chance," Tom Jenkins pleaded. "I admit that using company time to watch women undress was wrong, but I've been in therapy and now I'm better." "What you did was unconscionable, and well deserv- ing of discharge," asserted supervisor Harold Evans. "Besides, there's no proof that you're cured, and we can't take the chance that you'll revert to your old ways. Sorry, but reinstatement is out of the question." Was the discharge for just cause? Facts: An employee who worked at an apartment complex discovered that by removing the air condition- ing ducts, he could view the interior of the apartments and the in habitants.. Thereafter, the employee, who had suffered from a penchant for voyeurism for at -least seven years, went into the attics of the apartments in the complex more than a dozen times to observe the resi- dents. The worker's forays into the complex took place on company time and with the use of a company truck. When engaged in these acts of voyeurism, the employee falsified time sheets and, in some instances, claimed overtime. He also damaged property belonging to the complex. One day, the employee cut a small peephole in a bathroom ceiling to observe a woman in the shower. When the woman saw the worker's knife coming through the ceiling, she notified the police. The police contacted the company, which, in turn, investigated the incident. During questioning by the employer, the work- er denied everything. However, the worker subsequently was brought face to face with the residents of the building, and was positively identified. At that point, he admitted that he had entered the complex repeatedly in hopes of fulfilling his sexual fantasies. As a result, the company discharged him for violating its code of ethics. After his dismissal, the employee entered into therapy. Several months later, the worker submitted a letter to the company in which his therapist testified that the employee had gained insight into the causes of his June 27, 1988 voyeuristic tendencies and was ready to return to work. Citing the improvement in his condition, the employee appealed the discharge. Award: The employee's request for reinstatement is denied. (90 LA 689) Discussion: Although an employee's post - discharge behavior generally has no bearing on whether dismissal was just, the arbiter notes, "there has been a growing tendency by arbitrators to consider post -discharge treat- ment as one possible mitigating factor," particularly in alcohol and substance abuse cases. In fact, he notes, some arbitrators have suggested that the exception to the general rule should be broadened to include various psychological illnesses. However, the arbiter asserts, it would be "a serious mistake, both in reasoning and logic" to conclude that "the narrow exception giving consideration to an employee's post - discharge behavior" applies in this case. The employee's "psychological dysfunction" did not manifest itself in behaviors generally seen in discharge cases involving alcohol and drug abuse, such as absentee- ism, tardiness, or poor work performance, the arbiter points out. Rather, the worker's "acts of voyeurism had a direct and serious impact upon the employer both in terms of its potential liability and the extreme potential harm inflicted on its customers." Moreover, the employ- ee has failed to prove that he is "cured" and will not return to his voyeuristic ways, the arbiter says, pointing out that "no specific medical evidence was offered" of the worker's "degree of recovery or possible recidivism." Not only was the therapist's letter "brief" and of a "hearsay nature," but the therapist did not testify to the employee's condition in person, the arbiter notes. In addition, the arbiter stresses, voyeurism is "a chronic condition, which makes treatment and the control of its symptoms extremely difficult." Stressing that the em- ployee's actions constitute "a very serious breach of acceptable conduct," the arbiter concludes that the com- pany acted properly "in protecting its legitimate inter- ests" by discharging the worker. Pointers: A number of arbiters have considered var- ious kinds of mental illness as factors that may mitigate a discharge penalty. In one case, an arbiter decided that the discharge of an employee for excessive absenteeism was undeserved because, underlying his absences, "there exists a discernible mental health problem." (72 LA 1073) Similarly, an arbiter in another case held that a worker's insubordination was a manifestation of his mental illness that, when coupled with a procedural defect in the case, made discharge unreasonable. (69 LA 340) In yet another case, an employee's discharge was set aside after the arbiter determined that his absentee- ism and tardiness were the result of a post- traumatic stress disorder. (80 LA 797) Copyright 0 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Page 75 Employment Guide Toward More Effective ESOPs Employee stock ownership plans often fall short of their intended purpose of increasing worker involvement through broadened capital ownership, according to con- sultant and management professor Joseph R. Blasi. In general, Blasi says, ESOPs fail either because they provide little opportunity for workers to participate in company strategy or planning, or because they offer an insufficient incentive to workers to improve productivity. However, when properly structured, employee ownership can give workers a greater voice in management, as well as provide recognizable and immediate rewards for in- creased efficiency. Common Characteristics ESOPs consist of an employee- ownership trust, into which the employer contributes assets that are used to purchase shares of company stock, Blasi explains. The shares are allocated to employees as a form of deferred compensation that remains. tax -free until distribution, usually at retirement. Employers benefit because trust contributions can be deducted from pre -tax corporate income, while the company retains the use of the capital until the shares are distributed from the trust. Two forms of ESOPs generally are used: 10- Leveraged — Under this arrangement, the employ - ee -ownership trust is funded with borrowed money. The corporation amortizes the loan through periodic tax - deductible payments to the trust. 10- Non - Leveraged — In a non - leveraged ESOP, the trust is funded with cash or stock the employer has on hand, Blasi says. The employer's contributions to the trust — of cash, stock, or even real estate — are made out of pre -tax income. Problem Areas According to Blasi, ESOPs generally have not suc- ceeded in bringing about greater labor - management co- operation and worker involvement partly because ESOP companies have tended to adhere to traditional labor- management relationships. In most ESOP companies, he observes, worker participation in company decisions is largely restricted to "issues relevant to the employee's immediate concerns," such as safety and health, "rather than the company's goals or the means to reach those June 27, 1988 goals." There also is little attempt in many ESOP firms to develop quality circles or to encourage employee participation in strategic or long -range planning, the development of new products and services, and financial control, he notes. Moreover, although nearly 70 percent of ESOPs have boards of directors, only about 4 percent of these boards include non - managerial employees. In addition to the lack of cooperation, Blasi says, ESOPs often fail because stock ownership alone does not provide an effective incentive for workers. The incentive provided by an ESOP depends on many variables, Blasi notes, including the size of the annual contribution, the worker's distance from retirement, the performance of the stock, and the presence of voting and property rights that allow employees to feel like owners. Without voting privileges or immediate rewards for productivity in- creases, he contends, an ESOP has little impact on worker involvement. Employees also are significantly influenced by how equitably they feel'rewards are being distributed, Blasi says, noting that flagrantly inequitable allocation schedules tend to provoke "great skepticism" among employees. Improved ESOPs In order for ESOPs to be fully effective, Blasi points out, they require labor - management involvement and cooperation in strategic decision - making; redesign of work tasks to enhance job enrichment; and short -term profit- sharing or gainsharing to reward clearly measur- able improvements in productivity. The Small Business Administration also should create more focused pro- grams to encourage worker ownership, Blasi contends. In the small- business sector, he maintains, employee owner- ship may further business continuity, "which is a serious problem requiring more attention." Suggestions for improving the effectiveness of ESOPs, Blasi says, include: 00- Fewer exclusions — While employees may be excluded for working a minimum number of hours per year, Blasi points out, at least 80 percent of a firm's workers should be eligible to participate. A limit also should be set on the number of part -time workers that can be excluded, since these represent a growing seg- ment of the U.S. workforce. 00- Ownership rights — Worker- owners should be able to protect their rights through at least a minimum involvement in the administration of the company. This includes full voting rights on all stock in ESOPs. 10, Distributions — There should be more focus on providing equity to those employees with the least stock ownership, savings, and access to credit, Blasi recom- mends. The limit on the amount of stock distributable to an employee should be substantially increased, and allo- cations of shares among employees should be based on a more equitable formula than salary. (Employee Owner- ship: Revolution or RipoJj7 Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass., 1988) Page 76 Copyright ® 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. c C l Employment Robot Servicing Safety Workers who service industrial ro- bots can be protected from accidental injuries by safety controls, physical barriers, and careful work practices, according to new guidelines available from the National Institute for Occu- pational Safety and Health. In maintenance operations, NIOSH notes, employees who come within a de- activated robot's work area may be at risk if the machinery's heavy mov- ing arm is accidentally re- energized. To protect maintenance workers from injury while servicing robots, NIOSH recommends that employers first ana- lyze current conditions at the worksite to determine what hazards are present, and then choose the combination of safeguards that is most appropriate to the workplace. Controls and barriers available to protect workers include presence -sens- ing devices that automatically stop the robot if someone enters the work area, emergency push- button and trip -wire stops, shut -off switches that can be locked to prevent power from being restored again, and fixed barriers with interlocked gates. ( NIOSH, 4676 Co- lumbia Parkway, Cincinnati, Ohio) BRIEF NOTES... Technology's Workplace Impact: Positive and Negative Possibilities The introduction of new workplace technology holds "starkly contrasting possibilities for the future of working life in America," according to a report by the Office of Technology Assess- ment. New technology either will cre- ate more challenging jobs that afford employees greater freedom or increase the use of "disposable" workers, as employers attempt to achieve flexibil- ity by "avoiding long -term commit- ments to employees," the OTA report maintains. Technologies now being introduced have the "potential to reduce the me- chanical aspects of most work," allow- ing greater use of human imagination and greater opportunity for personal communication, the report says. How- ever, employers also may use technol- ogy to make jobs more mechanical, forcing employees into narrowly de- fined tasks "with little room for indi- vidual expression," OTA adds. Point- ing out that such narrow jobs are likely to be held by temporary and part -time workers, OTA cautions that employers that achieve flexibility Plant closing legislation is revived, as a new bill with notification requirements identical to those contained in the vetoed trade bill is introduced in the Senate. The bill (S 2528) would require employers with 100 or more workers to give 60 days' advance notice of shutdowns affecting at least 50 workers and of layoffs lasting more than six months and affecting one -third of the workers at the site. Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D- Ohio), spon- sor of the bill, says that mandatory advance notice is "a matter of basic fairness and common human decency, and it will become the law of the land." • Nearly 407,000 workers in 29 states were laid off for at least 30 days in 1987 as the result of plant closings and mass layoffs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. About half of the layoffs reported in 1987 were attributed to "slack" or seasonal work, with a large proportion of layoffs taking place in manufacturing industries, BLS says. More than half of the layoffs reported in the 29 surveyed states occurred in seven states: Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Pennsy:vania, Texas, and Wisconsin. Nearly one- fourth of the workers who lost their jobs were either in Texas or Wisconsin, BLS adds. June 27, 1988 largely through the use of "dispos- able" workers, who accumulate little experience and have little loyalty to an individual company, pay "a consider- able price" in impaired productivity. To ease the potential negative ef- fects of flexible work arrangements, OTA suggests that employers provide: 10- Profit- Sharing — Tying some portion of compensation to company profits is an effective way to keep employment steady, while providing workers with an incentive to maintain productivity. 10, Retraining — Retraining pro- grams for current employees would en- courage workers . to "adapt them- selves" to the new jobs that technology creates. 10, Portable benefits — "Universal- ly retainable" pensions and health in- surance benefits will be necessary to ensure the labor mobility that is essen- tial to adapt to technological changes. ( "Technology and the American Eco- nomic Transition: Choices for the Fu- ture," OTA Report No. 052 -003- 01096-8, GPO, Washington, D.C.) Illegal aliens may sue their employers over minimum wage violations, the U.S. Court of Appeals at Atlanta finds. Ruling on an undocumented alien's suit against a hotel employer, the court notes that under the Fair Labor Standards Act, the term "employee" is defined as "any individual employed by an employer," which "strongly suggests" that Congress intended the law to cover all workers not specifically excepted. The court also says that the "FLSA's coverage of undocumented aliens is fully consistent" with the Immigration Reform and Control Act, and, in fact, "goes fully hand in hand with the policies behind IRCA." (Patel v. Quality Inn South, CA 11, No. 87 -7411, 6/8/88) • Salary increases for "fast- track" employees are likely to be larger and more frequent than those of other workers, finds a survey of over 1,300 firms by Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby. Nearly one - fourth of the firms give raises averaging 8.4 percent to fast -track employees, compared with slightly more than 5 percent for exempt employees generally. In addition, 16 percent give fast - trackers more frequent raises than other employees, the survey says. (TPF &C, 245 Park Ave., New York, N.Y. 20167) Copyright ® 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. Page 77 Employment Guide Insight into Workplace Satisfaction Employees generally are satisfied with their positions, wages, and benefits, and feel well- informed about the direction their companies are heading, according to a nationwide study of employee work attitudes conducted by The Wyatt Company. However, the survey of 5,391 employees also finds that workers believe that perform- ance is not adequately linked with pay, employee input into key issues is limited, and there are few opportunities for advancement — a perception that has taken its "toll on employee commitment to the company." Following are highlights of the survey. Overall Satisfaction Satisfaction with wages and salaries is reported by nearly half (48 percent) of the surveyed employees, the study shows. Salaried workers are more content with what they earn than are hourly workers (53 percent vs. 45 percent), the survey finds, and male employees are more satisfied than female employees (52 percent vs. 44 percent). % . A large proportion (46 percent) of the surveyed em- ployees say that there is little connection at their compa- nies between job performance and level of pay. Thirty - eight percent of the respondents in managerial positions also see little connection between the two. A similar proportion (44 percent) believe that managers are too tolerant of poor performers, while 29 percent feel that management promotes the most competent people, and 30 percent partly agree with both points of view. Employer- provided benefits also receive satisfactory ratings by a majority (58 percent) of the surveyed employees, the study reports. Only 18 percent express dissatisfaction with their benefits package, while 24 percent say that they are partially dissatisfied. Fifty -nine percent of the survey respondents believe that their companies are doing "a good job of providing informa- tion on benefits," with 14 percent registering dissatisfac- tion and 27 percent partial dissatisfaction. One - quarter of the employees are dissatisfied with their company's retirement benefits, the survey adds. Careers and Commitment While most of the respondents indicate that they enjoy their jobs, many remain pessimistic over their chances June 27, 1988 for career advancement, the study notes. Among the surveyed workers, two - thirds (60 percent) describe their jobs as interesting. Others maintain that their current job provides "overall satisfaction and a sense of personal accomplishment" (64 percent each), and the "chance to use abilities and skills" (67 percent). On the other hand, only one -third (35 percent) of the employees feel that their companies offer good opportunities for career ad- vancement — with a comparable number either disa- greeing (32 percent) or partly disagreeing (33 percent). Uncertainty about available career paths "is under- mining commitment" to the surveyed companies, the study notes. Only 38 percent of the respondents feel that employees where they work are committed to the com- pany as "more than just a place to work," 28 percent say that employees generally regard their work as just a job, and 34 percent have a "partly negative /partly positive" attitude about employee commitment to the company. Similarly, only half (52 percent) of the employees say that they would recommend their company as a good place to work, while 16 percent maintain that they would not recommend it, and 32 percent have mixed feelings. Communication and Style Employers basically do a good job communicating to employees, but they are not as good at upward communi- cation, according to the surveyed employees. Seven out of 10 (71 percent) of the respondents say that they have a good understanding of company goals, and more than half (57 percent) feel that they understand the strategies used to reach those goals. However, when asked whether their companies encourage bottom -up communication, employees note that communication continues to be "top -down and non - participative." Only 40 percent of the surveyed employees say that their companies seek their views on key issues. In addi- tion, only 29 percent feel that management acts on their suggestions when it does solicit them. One - quarter of the respondents, at all levels, say that they "do not feel free to express their opinions at all," the survey notes. In describing the management style practiced in their organizations, 18 percent of the surveyed workers say that their companies are "proactive," compared with 40 percent who consider their firms to be "reactive." Ob- serving that "most companies continue to operate in traditional ways," the survey points out that: ► Only 25 percent of the respondents consider their companies "entrepreneurial," while 41 percent describe them as "bureaucratic." ► Only 22 percent of the employees refer to their organization's management style as "participative," while 40 percent label it "directive." ► Forty -three percent of the surveyed workers say that their companies are task - oriented, compared with 21 percent who say that their firms are people -oriented. ( "New Nat'l. Benchmark on Worker Attitudes," The Wyatt Co., 1850 M St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036) Page 78 Copyright m 1988 by The Bureau of National Affairs. Inc. t 4948 CITY OF EDINA F� _---CHECK NO. DATE (2' I 228779 08/09/88 AMOUNT 331.00 CHECK REGISTER VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION HILLS COURT INC. LAUNDRY 08 -15 -88 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 26- 4262 - 682 -68 12246 5928 11i 228780 08/09/88 12,689.00 SUPERIOR FORD CAPITAL OUTLAY 10- 4901 - 305 -30 2756 5817 GI 12,689.00 • 0' 228781 08/09/88 100.00 EDINA SWIM CLUB PRINTING 26-4600- 681-68 9 100.00 • « « « -CKS 228790 08/09%88 50.08 MARK --T SCHEUNEMAN - HOSPITALIZATION - 0_z_4-i56= 5i0 =-S - ", 50.08 « 0� 228791 08/09/88 452.40 ROLLIN B CHILI) GENERAL SUPPLY 10 =4504= 390 =30 -94325 - `- 452.40 - 228792 08%09%88 155.00 NOR =$TAR -TOOLS 0= 458D= 3Oi =30- 028924 -6223 155.00 • 211 221 228793 08/09/88 157.44 PREST EQUIP REPAIR PARTS i� -4540- 560 =56 1926 23 157.44 • 24 228794 08/09/88 133.54 UMhIYNB DIESEL-SALES - REPAIR -P -ART X4540= 56 -0 =56- 999301 -6160 7 -0 228795 08/09/88 IeS.23 SEARS TOOLS 40- 4580= 80i =60 -- -- - - -- - 29 125.23 3 08%09/88 119.48 NW- SERVI -CE -- STATION REPAIR -PART 1-D= 4540= 646 =64- 3 -1 I3] 119.48 « °, 228797 08%09/88 714.02 GOVT TRAIN SERV i SERVICES 1� = 4201= i00 � 1988 C OF EDINA 228806 08/09/88 5� 24.00 « 19.00 - CHECK 1 3TER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 08 -15 -88 GE 2 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. M MESSAGE 13 !4 MARGE BALD REG FEES 10- 3500- 000 -00 r I7 228807 08/09/88 640.00 MINNESOTA CLE REG FEES 10-42o-e--4-9-6--49- B. la 640.00 • ° „ 228808 08/09/88 700.00 CITY OF MINNETONKA SCHOOLS 10 -4202- 420 -42 113 700.00 « " 228809 08/09/88 50.00 MN DEPT OF NATL RES SERVICES 10 - 60 =2ii 17 ^ 50.00 s +e ,o 16; 228810 08/09/88 14.00 MICHAEL FRANKENBERG DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145- 000 -00 z,l 14.00 7 e 22I. I 228811 08/09/88 8.00 MN COMPOSER FORUM DUES 30= 4264= T81 =78 =,1 2:! 8.00 « ze 27 I 2 I23 228812 08/09/88 18.00 STEPHEN NESSER ART COMMISSION 30 -3501- 000 -00 i2e 18. 00 « 3 a «s « «s« 3, 27' 228810 08/09/88 2_9,819_.48 BURY d CARLSON PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 36' 37 39 29,819.48 « - - I28, I30 _ 228817 08/09/88 100.00 ADVANCED LEGAL ED SCHOOLS 10- 4202- 420 -42 39 40 31i,. i. 100.00 « 4, 42 228818 - - -- 08/09/88 - - 20.00 SHARON LOCKE CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 611 -61 43 4 34i 20.00 s - 4 46 36 228819 08/09/88 509.00 TOBIE DICKER PERSONAL SERVICES 23-4100 - 611 -61 4 4 7 e 3 -' 509.00 « 40 50 38 30 228.820 9._68 NAOMI JOHNSON MILEAGE 23- 4208 - 611 -61 I;Z ' 22882 0 08/09/8 8 24.69 NAOMI JOHNSON _ GENERAL SUPPLIES 23-4504-61 1 -61 _ 73 228820 08/09/88 2.50 NAOMI JOHNSON CLEANING SUPPLIES 23- 4512 - 612 -61 e4 "� 4 2 _- 228820 08/09/88 19.20 NAOMI JOHNSON CRAFT SUPPLIES 23 -4588- 611 -61 4; 56.07 « - 57 5e •'4 I 228821 08/09/88 42.00 BRYAN MOON ART WORK SOLD 23-3625- 000 -00 eoI1 _ 60 foe I47 42.00 « le2 48 228822 08/09/88 119.90 BETTY BELL PEDDIE ART WORK SOLD 23- 3625- 000 -00 I64i 119.90 • eel 50 ee f -- - t• «-CKS leel 52 - '.e9 53 228824 08/09/88 45.50 MARGARET NORDSTAG ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 70 54 -- 45.50 « 71 n 3sr- 56 228825 08/09/88 24.50 MIKE TRAUB ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 53 14 57 77 7 vyoo CITY OF soIwx - ' ~ , - ~|^i eeaoaa oe/oy/oa ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ` Z ~ � � l cxscw nsmIaTsn AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 31.So_- __ PHYLLIS 08-iS-88 PAGE ACCOUNT NO. INV. # it xwvw*--- ------- ART uonu So �-�&&��Uoo�Vo------- ' — ---------'�| �� - .|- , "! ^L �- 2| "L ^� iff 228828 08/09/88 110.60 SHARON MCKISSON ART WORK-SOLb-----93--162S--000-oo 228830 08/09/68 53.eO NORMA HANLON ART WORK SOLD e3-362S-000-00 13 228831 08/09/88 75.00 LOU ANN LEWIS ART WORK SOLD 23-36ES-000-00 TS. 66 2' 228832 08/09/88 384.00 DOROTHY ODLAND PROF SERVICES 23-4201-611-61 228833 08/09/88 211.00 TIM IVERSON PROF SERVICES 23-4eOl-611-61 '7____228834__08/09/88 e34.00 BETSY BRYANT PROF SERVICES e3-4eOi-611-61 34*::22883S 08/09/88 :04. JEAN GRAPP PROF SERVICES 23-4201-611-61 228837 08/09/88 336.00 SUSAN FRAME PROF SERVICES e3-4201-611-61 �4' e28838 08/09/88 252.00 MAUREEN BROCKWAY PROF SERVICES 23-4eOi-611-6i 252.00 0 4� 228839 08/09/88 168.00 HARRY HE144 PROF SERVICES 23-4eOi-6ii-61 4S 228840 08/09/88 184.00 BILL DIETRICHSON PROF SERVICES 23-4eOl-611-6i 40 228841 08/09/88 162.00 STARRI HEDGES PROF SERVICES 23-4201-611-61 51, 228842 08/09/88 96.00 J THOMAS NELSON PROF SERVICES e3-4201-611-61 521 96.00 - e28843 08/09/88 420.00 MONICA RUDGUIST PROF SERVICES 23-4201-611-61 7; 17 228844 08/09/88 3e6.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON PROF SERVICES 23-4201-6ti-61 , "! ^L �- 2| "L ^� iff 1301 228854 • SERVICES 40 -4201- 800 -8'0 -- - 154.00 228A1 0 SERVICES ZZ8A1 0 f10I '7 1988 OF EDINA ZZ8A1 0— 0 I42 CHECK STER ACCOUNTEMPS 08 -15 -81 +GE 4 Iv 45.00 ALTERNATOR CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT_ 11934 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. - - - - - - -- # P.O. i MESSAGE - - ALTERNATOR REBUILD - -- 10- 4580-301-30 1577 6243 =2 ZZ8A39 08/09/88 326.00 • REBUILD TOOLS 46- 4580-801-80 1579 6304 '31 ZZOA39 08/09/88 45.06 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 40-4580-801-80 1575 3 54 228845 08/09/88 542.00 MARGARET MCDOWELL PROF SERVICES 23- 4201 - 611 -61 I]� 542.00 • e 7 l 228846 PROF SERVICES 3= 420611 =61 - -- to 08/09/88 226.00 KATHY GUSTAFSON lrl B 226.00 • �10 228847 08/09/88 173.00 PAT WOLF PROF SERVICES 23 =4201 - 611 -61 -- - v 173.00 * I,4 ,]� I' 228848 08%09%88 PATRICIA HADFIELD PROF SERVICES 72.00 �,. 72.00 • e 5 I,fl 120 ° 228849 08/09/88 660.00 MARIAN ALSTAD PROF SERVICES 23- 4201 - 611 =61 - -- n rl 'I 660.00 I22 23-9 - 228850 08/09/88 99.00 PADGETT THOMPSON CONFERENCE 24 — ;25 38 =4202= 781 =78 99.00 • 26 2 ,I 228851 08/09/88 5,278.50 JOE GREUPNER PERSONAL SERVICES 27- 4100- 661 -66 m I2 nl � �3 228852 08/09/88 72.00 J b L ENTERPRISES CRAFT SUPPLY 23=4588= b11 =b1 -0947— 6443 3� Z71 72.00 • 3a. 35C 404 CKS »I X36 _ 1301 228854 • SERVICES 40 -4201- 800 -8'0 -- - 154.00 228A1 0 SERVICES ZZ8A1 0 f10I '7 zeaAi o . 0, °I ZZ8A1 0— 0 I42 08/09/88 08/09/88 369.00 ROOM 6 BOARD MACHINERY 25 -4942- 001 -23 08/09/88 447.56 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICES 40 -4201- 800 -8'0 08/09/88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMP3 SERVICES 50-4Z01-820-8Z 08/09/88 154.00 ACCOUMT2MPCi SERYICGB 50-4Z01�840 =84 08/09/88 154.00 ACCOUNTEMPS 32RVICE3 50-4201-860-80 * 228Af5 OS %09 /Sb 2.DO AD-AM3 PEST- CONTROL — BERVICEB 6= 426i= b82 -68 !t. -' °i 32.00 • ** * * ** -1 228A39 08/09/88 118.08 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 1578 6250 49I ZESA39 08/09/88 14.76 ALTERNATOR REBUILD GENERAL SUPPLY- ��=4504= 540=54 1581 6383 5� ZZ8A39 08/09/86 45.00 ALTERNATOR REBUILD REPAIR PARTS 10-4540- 560 -55 11934 6Z96 ZZ8A39 _ 08/09/88_ T8.95 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 10- 4580-301-30 1577 6243 =2 ZZ8A39 08/09/88 Z41.8T ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 46- 4580-801-80 1579 6304 '31 ZZOA39 08/09/88 45.06 ALTERNATOR REBUILD TOOLS 40-4580-801-80 1575 6213 54 543.7E • * * *- CKS 44 — —�45 146 47 46 49 50 5, 15] *** -CKS 54 ]] 5 57 I 61 62 61 64 6] 66 67 66 69 170 7, 72 17-1 * ** -CKS 74I, :x• ' t _ 198E CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -1S -88 PAGE 5 1 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. # MESSAGE 228A62 08/09/88 170.00 ANDERSON -TODD PROF SERVICES 10-4201- 630 -62 1 4 170.00 •«�.,, s *x -CKS 7 - 228A7E 08/09/88 114.95 ASHLAND CHEMICAL PAINT 10- 4544 - 335 -30 637118 6100 =' 114.95 s IZ - xxxxxx * **- CKS 228A80 08/09/88 5.81 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- S60 -56 ^� Z28A80 08/09/88 17.06 ASTLEFORD INTL REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 ' 22.87 « :« ** -CKS 2• •-' 228A8z 08/09/88 66.50 AT b T - TELEPHONE - - - - - -- 10 -4256- 510 -51 -- _ 228A82 08/09/88 4.98 AT b T TELEPHONE Z3-4256-61Z -61 ' ZZ8A82 08/09/88 4.35 - - -75.83 - - - AT b T -- TELEPHONE Z6- 4Z58-68Z-68 ='I " ' - _ _ - z. 228AB3 08/09/88_ 106.58 AT d T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 228A83 08/09/88 58.63 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 23 =4256- 612 -61 - IZ 165.21 • +- 228A84 08/09/88 13.96 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510-51 Z2!8AS4 08/09/ °8 14.55 AT 6 T INFO SYSTEM TELEPHONE 10-4Z56- 6ZZ-8Z - ZZ8A84 08/09/88 8.10 AT b T INFO SYSTEM TELEFHONE 50-4Z58-8Z1-8Z "I 36.61 s �xxxx « *** -CKS �z 43 - 228B01 08/09/88 62.50 B 6 B SEAT COVERS REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -S6 7650 ^' 62.50 « ' • +xx: *x+ -CKS si 228B05 08/09/88 102.48 BACH -BILL MILEAGE - 30- 4208 - 781 -78 102.48 - - - - - -- -- - - xxx -CKS ; 228B07 08 09/88 4,814.40 BAD E INC. W T METERS 40 -1 - 000 -00 4 2715 — I +5 4,814.40 �zl **v-CKS EEBB09 08/09/88 211.00 BAILEY NURSERIES PLANTINGS 10- 4560 - 644 -64 211.00 s sr+« -CKS 228813 08/09/88 995.93 - BARR ENGINEERING - - SERVICES------------ 10-4201-260-26 - - - - " e, 995.93 a C 1988 � OF EDINA CHECK __ CH_E_CK_NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR 228B1$ 08/09/88 32.89 BATTERY WAREHOUSE 32.89 - 228822 08/09/8$ 228822 08/09/88 STER ITEM DESCRIPTION REPAIR PARTS Ir 08 -15 -8L AGE 6 ACCOUNT NO. INV_8 P.0_N MESSAGE�� 1 — — ••• -CKS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 �e 9 - - -- -- -- ••• -CKS fo 1p 1,113.10 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 922 -82 - - -.13 1,584.60 BEER WHOLESALERS INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 1° 2,697.70 .4, .1 • «•R «« « «« -CKS ha I19 228830 08/09/88 96.10 BERTELSON EROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 440 -44 2C 392409 - -- - - - - -x1 ' 228B30 08/09/88 211.08 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 160 -16 393956 �x' 10- 4504 - 510 -51 228B30 08/09/88 _ _ — 554._30 _ BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 393961 6461 23 I`4 228B30 08/09/88 156.15 BERTELSON BROS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 16- 4516 -51b -5 1 393962 x, — Z28B30 08/09/88 12.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 —T8 393977 1x6 32255 211 --- t28B30 08/09/_88 5_4_.29_ BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 394360 x' ;, 228830 08/09/88 11.36 BERTELSON BROS ING. OFFICE SUPPLIE8 __ 30-4516 - 781 —T8 _ __ _ _Ize 394360 29 `'� 1,096.04 • ••• —CKS 46 I3 I x 34 228B54 08/09/88 105.22 BLUMBERG PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 510 -51 S92340 37+ 37 38J ••.••• - - — - - - -- -- — .•• -CKS 3DIr 40 1 ,1 ='. 228B70 08/09/88 28.00 BRADY OFFICEWARE GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 420 -42 32255 41 I °x 28_00 (43' �.3J ••• « «• ••• —CKS 46 I3 I 47' 1 3 228B77 , f - - -- 08/09/88 856.50 BR- AUN-ENG-TESTN"N -C C- ONSTRUCTTO"O -S - 70= 00 -00-1 -1920 „I 856.50 • 90 — — - - - - -- - — I61 • * **- CKS --534°x 4 1 1 54 08/09/88 716.90 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 345 -30 288883 08/09/68 T10.l0— BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC GENERAL SUPPLY -10- 4504 - 345-80 _ se s7l �4 "' >:28683 08/09/88 716.90 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-345 -30 160 i ° 228683 08/09_/88 445.51 BRYAN_ ROC_K_PROD._INC CHEMICALS 10- 4564- 642-64 !8040 la° 228683 08/09/88 522.60 BRYAN ROCK PROD. INC FILL MATERIAL 40- 4518 - 803 -80 �Go 40 ' 1,685.01 « ez 63 64 • 11 16640 228B91 08/09/88 _52.47 BURY d CARLSON- INC. BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 314 -30 30448 66 I'x 52.47 « -BLACKTOP - - - - -- -- ev •' ,J 70 «. « « «« ««« -CKS ;z40 •I 56 228C01 08/04/88 37.90 C d S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMMODITIES 23 -4624- 613 -61 072129 7J ' °'. LI, 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR CHECK REGISTER 08 -15 -88 PAGE 7 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO.—INV. B P.O. 8 MESSAGE _i2i G 24,483.37 r GQ]I 228C4S 08/09/88 526.85 COLLINS ELECTRIC PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 61 02 228C01 08/09/88 407.32 C d S DISTRIBUTING COST OF COMMODITIES 23- 4624 - 613 -61 072081 50= 4248 = 841 =84 2 147.00 • 445.22 t <3, 1 J 65 X15, »r» -CKS °6 rr» -CKS ° • 4 =- 228CO3 -- 08%09$9 17,078.00 C. 0 FIELD Cb. -MISC 50- 4632 - 822 -82 9T. -63 CONT= MINNESOTA GENERAL -- SUPPLY 27 -4504- 663 -66-- 3 228C44 08%09/88 382.90 COCA COCA BOTTLING INVENTORY 17,078.00 t 70 228C44 08/09/88 839.15 °. INVENTORY II° 7, 72 `5 55 lvG1-I�° 3] r »r »tt 1,64B.30 t rr» -CKS 77 7a 73 . - - -- -- - - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- -- - - - -- - - - - - - -- - -- plop - - » � + =CKS' ,4 • - 228C08 08/09/88 426_.69 CARLSON LK ST EQUIP. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 P40375 16 ,3 426.69 t ---- - - - - -- - -- -- ,i l - 228C09 -- 08/09/88 - - 471.40 -- - - -- CARLSON PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 510 -51 42083 zO 'S; 228C09 08/09/88 73.80 _ CARLSON PRINTING _ PRINTING 10- 4600- 140 -14 42D84 _ _ _ z, 545.20 » 22 123 9 228C10 08%09%88 1,568.00 CARLSON- STORE- FIX -CO MISC 5= 4942= 001 =23 25 =i 21 - 1 , 568. 00 27 22; � s= CKS_ —,28 23 _ J• . 4 228C30 _08/_09/88 199.4S CITY BEER INVENTORY SO- 4630 - 822 -82 91 -, EE8C30 08/09/88 E07.S0 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50= 4630=842 =84 33 EESC30 08/09/88 E84.10 CITY BEER INVENTORY 50 -4630- 862 -86 34. -7 _ 691.05 t .` .° ° '-0 » » » » »» — aJS — — - -J J »rr -CKS 39• 11 ft 21. 228C34 oB %09%88 24,- 446.00 CITY - -OF -- RICHFIELD -PROF- SERVICES 1 -0 -= 4201 = 600 -60 - i4o 113:! 228C34 08/09/88 37.37 CITY OF RICHFIELD POWER 10-4252- 345-30 42. »r» -CKS rir =CKS' G 24,483.37 r GQ]I 228C4S 08/09/88 526.85 COLLINS ELECTRIC PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 61 02 37 228C36 08709788 47.00 CITY-WIDE-SERVICES - CONTRACTED- REPAIRS 50= 4248 = 841 =84 I° 147.00 • °4 <3, 1 65 X15, »r» -CKS °6 4 =- _ 228C44 08/09/88 420.25 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 9T. -63 CONT= MINNESOTA GENERAL -- SUPPLY 27 -4504- 663 -66-- 3 228C44 08%09/88 382.90 COCA COCA BOTTLING INVENTORY -50= 4632 = 842 =84 70 228C44 08/09/88 839.15 COCA COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY SO-4632- 862 -86 7, 72 `5 55 lvG1-I�° 3] r »r »tt 1,64B.30 t rr» -CKS 77 7a 73 »r» -CKS rir =CKS' G GQ]I 228C4S 08/09/88 526.85 COLLINS ELECTRIC PAYMENT 60 -2040- 000 -00 61 02 526.S5 t ea I° °4 <3, 1 65 X15, »r» -CKS °6 67� 3 -i 228C64 08/09/88 9T. -63 CONT= MINNESOTA GENERAL -- SUPPLY 27 -4504- 663 -66-- - 66I �53 22SC64 08/09/88 856.29 CONT- MINNESOTA CONCESSIONS 27- 4624- 663-66 70 34I 953.92 » 7, 72 55 lvG1-I�° 3] r »r »tt rr» -CKS 77 7a 73 . plop ` 23 ° _2_2.8_065_ 08/09/88 639.50 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 299508 639.50 • vc: -�I23j 228D75 08/09/88 59.95 DOOR SYSTEMS INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 57858 IJ- - 59.95 t -�' t4ttty �] 228E08 08/09/88 110,692.00 EAGAN CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION - 28- 1300 - 000 -00 l .,WI' s i 110,892.00 s 1- I J5 3' . -- _ 228E17 _08/09/88 3,1S4.25 EAST_ _SIDE_BEVERAGE_ INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 EESE1T 08/09/88 6,994.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE INE VNTOR? 50-4630 - 882 -86 42 4 ]I_- ___111111 i` ^i- __228E37 08/09/88 118.14 EDINA FOUNDATION ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 4� I S, sz 131 54I ssJ 111111 22SE54 08/09/88 118.14 s 44.99 EIDEN -KRIS 44.99 s UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 t11t1s 228E78 08/09/88 175.27 INO- - CONCESSION 7= 4624 =-66 175.27 1 st # -CK§ +++ -CKS sss -CKS 111 -CKS 3f 3 3. 351 37 3° 390 40 4) , 42 43 4a 45 46 471 4e 4p 5o sz 53 54 15� 59I 57 !8 sol s� s11 -CKS I'ol 1988 OF EDINA CHECK STER 08 -15 -81 +GE 8 _ CHECK -NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV_ M P_0. MESSAGE -9 3! J' 228C85 08/09/88 _ _ 22.70 CULLIGAN CONTRACTED SERVICES 10- 4200 - 482 -48 I3 228C85 08/09/88 20.00 CULLIGAN SERVICES _ 10- 4201 - 630-62 42.70 s e e e o 22SC92_ 08/09/88 _ __ 146.00_ _CUSTOM FIRE APP REPAIR PARTS - - - -- 10-4540- 560 -56 2195 6411 ;Z 146.00 s - - -- - -- - - - -- - -- I, ,a 3 ` tattss sst -CKS_ ,e� - -- - - -- - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - -- %w 22SD27 08/09/88 333.10 DAVE S FOOD WAGON CONCESSION 27 -4624- 663 -66 ° 333.10 ! ° `''I atstst sst -CKS za• I" 228D29 DAVIOSEN DIST. INC. INVENTORY �G30= �4g =84 08/09/88 114.95 -;�SI I'- 114 95 t z° ` 23 ° _2_2.8_065_ 08/09/88 639.50 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS 26- 4564 - 682 -68 299508 639.50 • vc: -�I23j 228D75 08/09/88 59.95 DOOR SYSTEMS INC. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 57858 IJ- - 59.95 t -�' t4ttty �] 228E08 08/09/88 110,692.00 EAGAN CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION - 28- 1300 - 000 -00 l .,WI' s i 110,892.00 s 1- I J5 3' . -- _ 228E17 _08/09/88 3,1S4.25 EAST_ _SIDE_BEVERAGE_ INVENTORY 50- 4630 - 822 -82 EESE1T 08/09/88 6,994.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE INE VNTOR? 50-4630 - 882 -86 42 4 ]I_- ___111111 i` ^i- __228E37 08/09/88 118.14 EDINA FOUNDATION ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 4� I S, sz 131 54I ssJ 111111 22SE54 08/09/88 118.14 s 44.99 EIDEN -KRIS 44.99 s UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 420 -42 t11t1s 228E78 08/09/88 175.27 INO- - CONCESSION 7= 4624 =-66 175.27 1 st # -CK§ +++ -CKS sss -CKS 111 -CKS 3f 3 3. 351 37 3° 390 40 4) , 42 43 4a 45 46 471 4e 4p 5o sz 53 54 15� 59I 57 !8 sol s� s11 -CKS I'ol 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -15 -88 PAGE 9 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0—P.O.- R MESSAGE Gi 228F56 08/09/88 3,482.00 FRANK B. HALL b CO. INSURANCE 18- 4260- 510 -51 .; 3,482.00 # 1114 08/09/88 19.00 228E81 08/09/88 29.32 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -S6 99509 ° 28957 6 ' -- __228E81 08/09/88 - - -- 116.52 ENGINE PARTS SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 560 -56 99312 e GEN.. 7 CONTRACTED REPAIRS T -0 =4248= 440 =44 145. 84 # -- - - -- 9 =' 228F70 — - - 08/09/88 - - -- 291_.60 FRID_EN ALCATEL POSTAGE 228F37 08/09/88 540.00 FLOYD LOCK d SAFE CO REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 520 -52 64446 114 1 - -- - -- 540.00 • ro RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 — GENUINE 23 « «« -CKS 118 Gi 228F56 08/09/88 3,482.00 FRANK B. HALL b CO. INSURANCE 18- 4260- 510 -51 A`_41 .; 3,482.00 # 7 08/09/88 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 28957 Jzc �" Mar «aa 149.60 GEN.. COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS T -0 =4248= 440 =44 -93393 Py'4n =' 228F70 — - - 08/09/88 - - -- 291_.60 FRID_EN ALCATEL POSTAGE 10- 4290— S10 -51 PARTS 2 2 08/09/88 450.00 291.60 # COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 — GENUINE 23 CO. 884.85 • PARTS 10 =4540- 560= 56 0T6631 _ -- —'69 v � �,. aaaaaa 20.23 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 228G01 08/09/88 621.60 G d K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 301 -30 161.30 « 2Z8G01_ _ 08/09/88_ 234.70 G d K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 560 -56 Z3 228601 08/09/88 177.12 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 646 -64 �I__ 29 01 228601 08/09/88 182.40 G d K 8ERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 540 -54 13ci 228601 08/09/88 48.00 G 8 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 28- 4262 - 702 -70 228G01 08/09/88 282.80 6 6 K SERVICES LAUNDRY 0 =4262= 861 =80 1,1321 I33 1,S46.62 « I35I ♦ ;I 'I 228G18 08/09/88 117._00 GATLIN- MICHAEL PROF SERVICES 23 -4201- 611 -61 3, 228G18 08/09188 90.00 GATLIN - MICHAEL ADVERTISING 3=4214= 611=61 207.00 « 13� A`_41 j� n_ 228624 08/09/88 19.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 301 -30 28957 GENUINE `3 228G24 08/09/88 149.60 GEN.. COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS T -0 =4248= 440 =44 -93393 Py'4n 228G24 08/09/88 266.25 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 28956 PARTS 228G24 08/09/88 450.00 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS RADIO SERVICE 10- 4294 - 560 -56 92805 GENUINE PARTS CO. 884.85 • PARTS 10 =4540- 560= 56 0T6631 _ -- —'69 v 47I 08/09/88 20.23 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 560 -56 074853 ° IFFIS a' 161.30 « ,9 121 22 123 24 s « «=CKS25 26 27 ze 29 ]D «!! —CKS 3t 3 33 34 35 I36 37 36 39 4° X41 sss -CKS —145 146 47 46 149 SC 51 ,52 #sa= CKS - -63 54 55 156 157 56 179 160 63 # ## —CKS 6 228G32 08/09/88 63.08 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 —S6 075152 s :i 228632 08/09/88 60.41 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-560 -56 075357 87 Szl 228632 08/09/88 17.58 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10 =4540- 560= 56 0T6631 _ -- —'69 228632 08/09/88 20.23 GENUINE PARTS CO. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540 - 560 -56 074853 ° IFFIS a' 161.30 « hz I55Ij �II�SI 157, « # # # ## 173 74 75 d 1988 OF EDINA CHECK STER --CHECK NO-DATE S AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 22SG38 08/09/88 22SG57 08/09/88 22SG57. _.- _- 08/09/88 100.00 _ _ _ _ GEORGE BUTLER 100.00 # 200.23 GOPHER OIL CO. 80.00 GOP HER _OIL_.CO_._ POLICE SERVICES -_ 08 -15-8 AGE 10 ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 10- 4100 - 430 -42 i MESSAGE+ I: 3 r 3 'e # ## —CKS 'f GENERAL SUPPLY 28- 4504 - 702 -70 345429 :o ,e 28- 4504 - 702 -70 " — 13 ;14 * ## —CKS 54 n 1a ,z1 z2 234 24 +# =CKS .5 25 �z7f # ## —CKS # ## —CKS 50 51 52 ### —CKS 1'" 58 _ eo # ## —CKS lei �aI 1 ' 228H34 08/09/88 2_,575.25 HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM & BOARD 10- 4286- 220 -22 17155 64 �40 2, 675.25 # i65 r51 < 22SG68 08/09/88 372.00 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 322 -30 633551 I'S.___22SG68 _____.08/09/88 50.49 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC_ CO.____ REPAIR PARTS. 10-4540- 540 -54 629991 228I09 08/09/88 ZZ8G68 08/09/88 28.58- GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. CREDIT 10-4540 - 646 -64 626024 i1c .7. a # # # #r# 393.91 • # ## —CKS '° I.a *4W 228G80- . 08/_09/_88 100. 00 GR_EER -PAT ART COMMISSION 30- 3501 - 000 -00 100.00 • 23 I_. EESM19 08/09/88 62.40 HAR NED LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 314-30 026305 62.40 s 311 132 228H21 08/09/88 93.42 HARMON GLAS ONTRACTEt—CONTRACTED- REP- 6= 4e�8=5b0= 51593 -00 -6E 2 93.42 # 3" 228H22 08/09/88 100.00 HAROLD SWANSON POLICE SERVICES - 10-4f00- 430 =4g 100.00 # 228H23 08/09%88 6,953.44 HARRIS HOMEYER-CO. INSURANCE X4260= 510=51 'e wj ZZ8HZ3 08/09/88 615.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 10- 4260- 510 -51 - ^! 7,568.44 • 2 —- 228H30 A8/09/88 245.00 REDBERO 6 SONS —00. GENERAL— SUPPLYi -0 =4504= 301 =30 -45176 245.00 * ## —CKS 54 n 1a ,z1 z2 234 24 +# =CKS .5 25 �z7f # ## —CKS # ## —CKS 50 51 52 ### —CKS 1'" 58 _ eo # ## —CKS lei �aI 1 ' 228H34 08/09/88 2_,575.25 HENN COUNTY TREAS. ROOM & BOARD 10- 4286- 220 -22 17155 64 �40 2, 675.25 # i65 r51 9F # # # # ## ### —CKS t83 �3I 228I09 08/09/88 85.00 IAAO DUES 10- 4204 - 200 -20 692402 1° 54I 85.00 • 72 a # # # #r# # ## —CKS '° v: - 1W 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08 -15 -88 PAGE 11 rwrew Nn nATF AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. # MESSAGE Fk . ! '±.�(t g •a:. !ter, -, t n �� j� � rn Y 'kf�,�a, R��'y "I�'� �. - 7�.� �. a.tlt� 1, !Y- ! 'U ,r;':h% 1"."e 08/09- /88 7S.50 INDUST SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4S40- S40 -54 322530 _ — 228I42 08/09/88 78.50 INDUST SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 540 -54 322530 228I42 08109/88 78.50- INDUST SUPPLY CO. REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 540 -54 322530 j 78.50 + o**-CKS 228I49 08/09/88 28.75 INMAC GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504- 510 -51 28.75 • - -- ***-CM— i 08/09/88 37.90 - -__ JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 30 -4564- 783 -78 88595 ___228J14 37.90 • -- - - -- -, * # # # #* * ** -CKS 228 ,135 08/09/88 468.00 JERRYS PRINTING SERVICES 10- 4201 - 860 -26 1904 468.00 • _ _ _I *** -CKS 228J41 08/09/88 333.15 JIM HATCH SALE$ TOOL$ 1 0 -4550= 301 =30 -8537 333.15 • 228,174 08/09/88 111.69 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 39773 6056 ' - — 74 ZZ8JT4� - - --- 08/09/88 -- 142.03 - ---- -- -- - - - -- JUSTUS LVMBER - GENERAL SUPPLY 50=4504 = 762=78-4-1-04 , 66125 Z28J74 08/09/88 25.28 JUSTUS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLY 30-4504- 782-78 4E627 278.98 • * # # # ## * ** -CKS 228K09 E28K09 08/09/88 08/09/88 12.95 10T.10 KAMAN- BEARING -& SPLY KAMAN BEARING & SPLY REPAIR -PARTS REPAIR PARTS -0= 4540=520 =52 10- 4540 - 520-52 1!28K09 06/09/88 33.06 KAMAN BEARING 6 SPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560-55 173.15 *s * **r * ** -CKS 228K3S 08/09/88 27.40 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4SO4- 646 -64 626992 6405 228K35 08/09/88 412.75 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 626493 228K35 08-/09 /888 15.96 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 0 =454b- 540 -54 b268$5 6245 228K35 08/09/88 68.37 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540-540 -54 634470 6242 228K35 08/09/88 15.29 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10 -4604- 646 -64 626797 6377 * * *n ## * ** -CKS 228K42 08/09/88 5,364.93 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 10-4524- 314 -30 228K42 08/09/88 5,316.34 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 10 -4526- 314 -30 228K42. 08/09/88 5,390.46 KOCN MATERIAL$ CO ROAD -OIL 0 =526= 314 =30 EEBK42 08/09/88 5,122.79 KOCH MATERIALS CO ROAD OIL 10- 4526 - 314 -30 Fk . ! '±.�(t g •a:. !ter, -, t n �� j� � rn Y 'kf�,�a, R��'y "I�'� �. - 7�.� �. a.tlt� 1, !Y- ! 'U ,r;':h% 1"."e 1988 L or soIw* 1--_CHECK-NO. DATE ^^.-.^ '...''-~ oosuw aTse AMOUNT VENDOR C A°& WE U°"U MATCO`^'0 "° __ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 3 26,601.4S i'-'1---2ESK57 08/09/88 SIS13.53 KUETHER DIST. CO. INVENTORY 50-4630-842-84 10 2281-04 08/09/88 4,431.00 LAHASS CORPORATION CAPITAL OUTLAY 10-4901-305-30 54e sale 23' 4,431.00 2-5 12281-28 08/09/88 33S.81 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4SO4-322-30 9SS496 ZZ8LES 081013188 334.57 LAWSON PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10-4504-3ES-30 985494 31 2PSLE8 08/09/88 165.89 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10-46EO-560-56 9831,04 22BLE8 08/09/88 3EO.19 LAWSON PRODUCTS PARTS 10-4620-S60-S6 Z7� R!ZSLP-8 08/09/88 111.51 LAWSON PRODUCTS REPAIR PARTS (40-4S40-803-80 9SS493 3. 2e8L30 08/09/66 1,339.60 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4248-801-80 1610e 63ee 42, ZZ!8L30 08/CV/85 3,E41.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4Z48-801-80 16103 6316 1.3� :151 Z!Z!aL-30 Qa/Q'7,r88 3145a.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 49-qm4a-aoi-ao i6io4 631T 1�1 Z!i!8L30 08/09/68 3,171.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4E48-601-80 16105 6318 47' 4"1 -1,'! 2!1!8L30 08/0'9/88 1 10150.00 LAYNE MINNE50TA CO. t 7 0 N T R -A C T I t D —R E I i -0 k -1 Ft _3 —4 0 F--4 Z -4 6 -- a 0 17�$ 0- 1- W 1 011-63to 33 E&8L30 08/09/88 4,3EO-.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4E48-a0l-80 16100 6319 50 31, Z?-8L30 08/09/88 41800.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40-4248-aOl-aQ 16108 63ag 1:2 401 22,139.60 53 11-1. 2281-34 08/09/88 22.80 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY P-7-426e-664-66 5 22.80 so .01 634 1 sz rZomot osfuly/oa 74.ZZ MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. REPAIR PARTS 10-4540-560-56 55137 6410 1,', , M07 08/09/88 6,218.89 —822 7-3 3c 08/09/88 14,162.35 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY SO-4630-842-84 741 1-1-i 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK N0. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION !� 31 22SM07 08/09/88 18,843.70 MARK VII SALES INVENTORY '' c ` 7' 228M11 08/09/88 200.00 MARTIN- MCALLISTER SERVICES 228M30 ° 1,633.50 MET WASTE CON COMM BLDG PERMITS 200.00 # 0 —. 228M25 08/_09/_88 `I^ - 228M19 08/09/88 133.56 M CGUIRE 228M16 08/09/88 GENERAL SUPPLIES MCCAREN DESIGNS SERVICES 2,427.90 3i 228M10 08/09/88 _969.00 1,181.25 MCCAREN DESIGNS SERVICES 08/09/88 228M16 08/09/88 1,181.25 MCCAREN DESIGNS SERVICES E28M19 - -- 228M1G - -_ 06/09/88 1,181.25— MCCAREN DESIGNS SERVICES 08/09/88 . 1y 41 2,881.01 228M27 08/09/88 ` al f*k *ff CIat7I 228M30 08/09/88 1,633.50 MET WASTE CON COMM BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 0 —. 228M25 08/_09/_88 `I^ - 228M19 08/09/88 133.56 M CGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES = _ 228M19_ 08/09/88 2,427.90 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS ff *fff 2z 228M19 08/09/88 _ 292.65 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY _ TOOLS p 56 E28M19 08/09/88 26.90 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY PARTS 08/09/88 174.30 1y 41 2,881.01 228M27 08/09/88 465.25 1_, 08 -15 -88 PAGE 13 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE , 50- 4630 - 862 -86 j3 * ** -CKS 6 I _i_O =42 -8 f-m 420= 42- -1429- 10, - -- 2 .z ssv= CKS — 3 30- 4201 - 782 -78 " 30-4224 =781-78 n 30-4224- T8Z-T5 8• 30- 4224- 78E -78 9 21 22 • -- - * ** -CKS .24 10 -4504- 560 -56 10- 4540- 560 -56 10- 4580-560-56 10- 4620 - 560 -56 228M22 08/09/88 92.64 MCNEILUS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY �� =450= 343 =30 33807 -- 92.64 # 1,584.65 451 * * * * ** * MED OXYGEN d EQUIP _EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 MED OXYGEN D EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 440 =44 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 19623 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 23 -4512- 612-61 19690 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19716 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19719 CIat7I 228M30 08/09/88 1,633.50 MET WASTE CON COMM BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 0 —. 228M25 08/_09/_88 9,30 1331 4 228M25 08/09/88 — 97.20 3 b,Ilj' 10 6 . so # II37 380.00 MIAMA SCHOOL 8= 4202 = 701 =70 -- �93i 4 ff *fff 380.00 # p 56 22SM27 08/_09/88 495.00 I4: 228M42 228M27 08/09/88 174.30 1y 41 228M27 08/09/88 465.25 1_, 228M27 08/09/88 450.10 1,584.65 451 * * * * ** * MED OXYGEN d EQUIP _EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 440 -44 MED OXYGEN D EQUIP EQUIP MAINT 10 -4274- 440 =44 MERIT SUPPLY PARTS 10- 4620- 560 -56 19623 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLY 23 -4512- 612-61 19690 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19716 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19719 *00-CKS 3410 36�` 37 38 0 39 40 *« *=CKS 41 142 • 43 - i4A 45 46 4, 47 48 i *i =C1( 49 50 i 51 � 52 —�53 154 (55+ 5 15] 7 178 * ** -CKS 59, (60 61 62 6J 64 69 * ** -CKS �67 If 68 69 70 � 71 72 *" - CKS 73 74 � e CIat7I 228M30 08/09/88 1,633.50 MET WASTE CON COMM BLDG PERMITS 10- 3095 - 000 -00 0 1,633.50 # a 9' 228lb— 08/09%88 380.00 MIAMA SCHOOL 8= 4202 = 701 =70 -- �93i 4 380.00 # p 56 _I5� 228M42 08/09/88 31.70 MIDWEST ASPHALT COR. BLACKTOP 10 -4524- 301 -30 >r *00-CKS 3410 36�` 37 38 0 39 40 *« *=CKS 41 142 • 43 - i4A 45 46 4, 47 48 i *i =C1( 49 50 i 51 � 52 —�53 154 (55+ 5 15] 7 178 * ** -CKS 59, (60 61 62 6J 64 69 * ** -CKS �67 If 68 69 70 � 71 72 *" - CKS 73 74 � e 1988 l OF EDINA CHECK STER 08 -15 -8i GE 14 - - - CH-ECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. $ P.O. M MESSAGE , I - - - - 31 .70 s - - -- - - — I= # #� *x# - - - -- -- -- - - -- -- - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- -- #s# -CK3 ,3 - eI e ° 228M63 08/09/88 103.05 MN. BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 822 -82 '� _ e I" 228M63 08/09/88 436.85 MN. BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632-84E -84 0 228M63 08/09/88 370.80 MN. BAR INVENTORY 50- 4632 - 862 -86 �1O ��- - - - 910.70_• — — — - - -- -- - -- — -- - - - - -- __ r V # ##— CKS :ta 228M66 08/09/68 73.76 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 0__ 4226 = 420 =42 228M68 08/09/88 22.86 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 420 -42 °I _ 228M68 ___03/09/88 18.56 MN. CELLULAR TEL._ EQUIP RENTAL 10_- 4226- 420 -42 _ zO 5 MM8M68 08/0918a 23.48 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 1 0- 4226 - 420 -42 zt ._ EE8M68 08/09/88 23.81 MN. CELLULAR TEL. EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226- 420 -42 22 23 I -- 162.47 • za = • # # # ## # ## -CKS I2R i 27 ='I 228M70 08/09/88 97.50 MN. CONWAY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 560 -56 118755 1�� _ Vix3j 97.50 III 30 3t CKS�33 � >n 228M73 _08/09/88 88_.00 MN. ELEVATOR SERVICE CONTRACTS 30- 4288 - 781 -78 ;b0 88.00 s - - -- - - - -- - -- 37 I3e # * # # #e #+k# -CKS 3 ��JZia2 228M76 06/09/88 125.46 MN. GLOVE GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 301 -30 23126 yl33 - - - - - -- -- 125.46 • ail! 3,i ea ae v c 3J " 3? 2281;81 ZZaMal 08/09/88 08/09/88 81.70 5.tT 86.97 • MN - -TORT-1 N MN. TORO INC. REPAIR -PARTS RCrAIR rARTS 0_-4540= 5bd= 56 _T18459 10-4540-560-56 718155 . 33250 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 7° 50- 4632- 822 -82 714 sa! 22SN68 08/09/88 681.50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 72 _ ss 22SN68 08/09/$8 876.00 NORTHSTAR IGE INVENTOR 50 =4632= $62-$6 73 se 11690.00 « 74 s7 228NO3 08/09/88 330.00 MPLS-SEWER -6_- WATER CONTRACTED- REPAIRS 4d= -4248= 801- 80-- 20656- °I 330.00 « as, �47 140 228N09 06/09/88 250.08 MUNICILITE CO.- PARTS 10 -4620- 560 -56 1014 F # ## -CKS 6146 # # # #�# -- -- -- - -- — # ## -CKS l-e ,. 22SN68 08/09/88 . 33250 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 7° 50- 4632- 822 -82 714 sa! 22SN68 08/09/88 681.50 NORTHSTAR ICE INVENTORY 50- 4632- 842 -84 72 _ ss 22SN68 08/09/$8 876.00 NORTHSTAR IGE INVENTOR 50 =4632= $62-$6 73 se 11690.00 « 74 s7 77� 7 — fLl 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE 228N72 08/09/88 9 !' 228N82 08/09/88 E AMOUNT 4,933.16 4,933.16 ! 33.75 33.75 228017 08/09/88 1.13.00 15 17 s� I,L._ - - - -!!f f if CHECK REGISTER 08 -15 -88 PAGE 15 VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 8 P.O. 0-MESSAGE NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES d TUBES NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF COMMODITIES OFFICE PRODUCTS SERVICE CONRACTS 10 -4616- 560 -56 12 • - f!f -CKS I' e • 7 !!! -CKS °• — 2 23- 4624 - 613 -61 151058 13 14 • 10 -4288- 510 -51 56104 '= 228030 08/09/88 240.30 OLD DUTCH FOODS CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 - - - - -- - - -- 240_30 • �= 2" !lffff 2s, 228P18 08/09/88 345.45 - PAULSON ART - WORK -SOLD 23= 3625 - 000 =00 6 2: 228P18 08/09/88 172.76 PAULSON PERSONNEL SERVICES 23 -4120- 613 -61 115 Ie 1e• 10 z1 2I -- - - -- !!! -CKS 2 124 4 21 26 • Iv 518.23 + __I fffflYf ,•. - 228P25 08/09/88 95-.-00--- PEAK - CONSTRUCTION— CONTRACTED - REPAIRS1 -0= 4248 = 646 =64 — Cs. '2 498.00 • (3.11 l lal 13.1 ftffff 22SP27 08/09/88 11800.00 PEAT MARWICK MAIN CO UNAPP SURPLUS - 11800.00 ! 41 22SP30 08/09/88 20503.00 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING CONCESSIONS 228P30 08/09/88 257.80 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY 142i 43; 228P30 08/09!88 418.85 PEPSI - COLA - BOTTLING INVENTORY- - �44 228P30 08/09/88 350.05 PEPSI COLA BOTTLING INVENTORY " I4, 3,529.70 ! 66 -2490- 000 -00 27 -4624- 663 -66 50- 4632- 822 -82 50 =4 -632= 842 =84 SO-4632- 862 -86 °3 22@P78 08109 /88 SE-O- —PR- INTERS--SERV -INC EQUIP -MAINT 28=4274= 704 =70 -28 52.00 ! s;l 53 S4 228P80 08/09/88 13,263.51 PRIOR LAKE AGG. SAND GRAVEL d ROCK 10 -4522- 314 -30 228P80 08/09/88 57 257.36 — PRIOR- CAKE -4iGG. BAND- GRAVEL_"OCK_ 4-0 = 522= 803 80 56 � -- 13, 520 .87 ! lc• w**-CKS x 31 32 133 34 35 37 *00-CKS 38 3G 40 41 42 43 «- CKS_ — 45 !!f-CKS fff -CKS 51 52 53 - s«« -CKS 169 70 71 72 llm 4 �.t \r dal r « « « «« * ** *—CKS 22BR49 0 08/09/88 4 42.72 R ROAD RESCUE E 1988 OF EDINA 07045 — CHECK STER 08 -15 -8. 4GE '16 CHECK NO __DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. # MESSAGE ] '� 228881 0 08/09/88 2 215.77 R RUBENSTEIN 8 ZIFF C COST OF COMMODITIES 2 23- 4624 - 613 -61 1 112775 * ** —CKS z ,r s 228020 08/09/88 116.00 QUICK SERV BATTERY REPAIR PARTS 10 -4540- 560 -56 25884 e ° - -- — -- 116_00 + 228R83 0 08/09/88 1 135.60 R RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON R ]. e 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5 54011 'S 1 135.60 + *«+—CKS I10 228R13 08/09/88 112.00 RADIO INSTALLS EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 440 -44 11844 121.84 S —'13 TOOLS 4 ` 40537 5 5401 — 112.00 + 121.84 + ,a Sj— 228S27 0 08/_09/88 1 14_3_.40 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS G GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 10- 4504 - 646 -64 9 94862_ 6 6087 _ 228327 0 08/09/88 3 37.26 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS G GENERAL SUPPLY 4 40- 4504- 801 -80 4 48989 6 _ 228527 0 08/09/88 3 35.10 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS P PAINT 4 40- 4544 - 801 -80 5 51868 6 .-- 228R22___ -- 08/09/88 - -- 241.00 REM SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLY - — 30- 4504 - 782 -78 37635 e 241.00 00 + -- - — - - - - _.zo 1.7 z, — — — — - -- - - - - -- - -- - - -- — 000—CKS 1zJ,0 zaI 228847 08/09/88 396.63 ROAD MACHINERY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 23095A 28 396.63 * 2,11k 4 �.t \r dal r « « « «« * ** *—CKS 22BR49 0 08/09/88 4 42.72 R ROAD RESCUE E ENERAL—gUPPLY— i i- 0---45 -04= 440 =44- 0 07045 — — — 42.72 + CKS '� 228881 0 08/09/88 2 215.77 R RUBENSTEIN 8 ZIFF C COST OF COMMODITIES 2 23- 4624 - 613 -61 1 112775 215.77 + — — 228R83 0 08/09/88 1 135.60 R RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540 - 560 -56 5 54011 'S 1 135.60 + 30 °� 228315 0 08/09/88 1 121.84 S SEARS T TOOLS 4 40= 4580 = 801 -80 4 40537 5 5401 — °' 1 121.84 + Sj— 228S27 0 08/_09/88 1 14_3_.40 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS G GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 10- 4504 - 646 -64 9 94862_ 6 6087 _ 228327 0 08/09/88 3 37.26 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS G GENERAL SUPPLY 4 40- 4504- 801 -80 4 48989 6 _ 228527 0 08/09/88 3 35.10 S SHERWIN WILLIAMS P PAINT 4 40- 4544 - 801 -80 5 51868 6 li aB e 215.76 + e _ 7 • " * * "" o 228.558 _ 08/09/88 228558 08/09/88 228561 08/09/88 4-- ,'n 124 20 �• 29 �V 33 �3 33 J4 3C 37 to 130 a2 ac 47 40 e9 �5: 1,614.97_ 189.50 1,804.47 « 3_8.00_ 38.00 « STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS_ STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX STATE_TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLY 08 -15 -88 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O.--#-MESSAGE 1' 4 I3 50- 4630- 822 -82 14 50- 4630 - 842 -84 e J"n: 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER e 9 to 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 4540-560 -56 M �z 10- 3113 - 000 -00 -- — — CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR _— ITEM DESCRIPTION PARTS 1 I « « «- CKS -17 le M52101 6301 10- 4504 - 440 -44 G26576 3; 228536 08/09/88 _ 2,796.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTR. CO. INVENTORY « «« -CKS I24 4i 21:8336 08/09/88 _ 6,965.55 30VTH5IDE DISTR. CO. INVENTORY k-li 'I n' 9,761.75 « 7 • " * * "" o 228.558 _ 08/09/88 228558 08/09/88 228561 08/09/88 4-- ,'n 124 20 �• 29 �V 33 �3 33 J4 3C 37 to 130 a2 ac 47 40 e9 �5: 1,614.97_ 189.50 1,804.47 « 3_8.00_ 38.00 « STATE BLDG INSP BLDG PERMITS_ STATE BLDG INSP SUR CHG TAX STATE_TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLY 08 -15 -88 PAGE 1 ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O.--#-MESSAGE 22SS72 0 1' 4 I3 50- 4630- 822 -82 14 50- 4630 - 842 -84 e M52439 e . — - - -- - -- •«. -CKS e 9 to 10- 3095 - 000 -00 10- 4540-560 -56 M �z 10- 3113 - 000 -00 -- — — 13 1,291.00 S 114 1e PARTS 1 I « « «- CKS -17 le M52101 6301 10- 4504 - 440 -44 G26576 ° 2I zz . « «« -CKS I24 22SS72 0 08/09/88 7 79.95 S STREICHERS G GENERAL SUPPLY 1 10 -4504- 420 -42 M M52439 ___ 228572 0 08/09/88 6 618.50 S STREICHERS R REPAIR PARTS 1 10- 4540-560 -56 M M51TTE 6158 228372 0 08/09/88 1 1,291.00 S STREICHERS P PARTS 1 10- 446EC-560 -56 M M52101 6301 26 • ze 30 , 31 3 33 3a � _ 228711 _ _ 08/09/88 546.90 TESSMAN SEED d CHEM. _ SEED 10 -4568- 643 -64 145129 6404 ^' ' 2 228711 08/09/88 1,298.00 TESSMAN SEED 6 CHEM SEED 0= 4568= b43 =64 136196 4251 I 3 2,844.90 « 70• s4I 72 ++ =CKS ]3 228T26 08/09/88 21.07 THERMAL CO. REPAIR PARTS f0- 4540 - 646 -64 96423 6306 "« 7 1988 OF EDINA �2. _ CHECK___N_0. DATE AMOU_I 228T30 08/09/88 ` 22ST72 08/09/88 22ST72 - _08/09/88 -- - - - ---- - -- - ----- - CHECK - - STER--- - -- -- - - - -- - - -- - - -- - 08 -15 -8• .GE - 1A- --�. T VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE 21.07 r - -- -- -- — - - - - -- -- - - - 3 — 14 •»» —CKS s e 12,750.00 THORPE DISTR. INVENTORY 50- 4630- 862 -86 - e 12,750.00 » - -- -- - - -- -- --- — -- I9 ,o - - - - -- -- — --- - - - -- - — — - — — - -- — — -- -- - - »r »—CKS- - -_,zr 231.95 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 8786 5483 14 207.00 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSION 26 -4624- 683 -68 8751 115, 438.95 » - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- -- - - - - -- to � .4 3s 228V15 08/09/88 488.13 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLY S0- 4514 - 822 -82 215881 6264 ,e LCOV15 08/09/88 1,292.00 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLY 50- 4514-842 -84 215883 6264 �, C_K_S__xo 08/09/88 1,246.55 VAN J'G, P_2SU14 08/09/88 173.02 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4504 - 507 -50 778437 __ 228U14_ 08/09_/88 173.02 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP PARTS 10- 4540 - 507 -50 778437 228U14 08/09/88 173.02— UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 = 507 -50 778437 228U14 08/09/88 111.82 UNITED ELECTRIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 40-4540 - 801 -80 782160 305.10 2e GRAINGER 21' PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 284.84 42 : 228W08 08/09/88 102.35 W. -u.— GRAINGER — REPAIR -PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 — - `, °'i 228W08 08/09/88 117.72 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 2.3 _., » » » » »» 525.17 » — » »» -CKS 3,,� . 08/9/88 30.00 0=4201= 643 =64 3228020 ,I 30.00 • i� —137r 228V10 08/09/68 206.95 VALLEY INDUSTRIAL GASOLINE 28 -4612- 704 -70 - - -- 208.95 • _ 3s 228V15 08/09/88 488.13 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLY S0- 4514 - 822 -82 215881 6264 X81 LCOV15 08/09/88 1,292.00 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLY 50- 4514-842 -84 215883 6264 �, 228V15 08/09/88 1,246.55 VAN PAPER CO. PAPER SUPPLY 50=4514 = 862 = -2 $615886 6264 78 3,026.68 • n - 4, all 228W08 08/09/88 305.10 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 330 -30 275802 42 : 228W08 08/09/88 102.35 W. -u.— GRAINGER — REPAIR -PARTS 10 -4540- 540 -54 — - `, °'i 228W08 08/09/88 117.72 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 40- 4540 - 802 -80 525.17 » — 49 s'' s 1'i I_. s,l 541 5a� r » »r »r 228W15 rr »rr# 100.00 • 228W28 08/09/88 8.00 WATER PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646 -64 072562 228W26 08/09/88 208.40 WATER PRODUCTS CASTINGS 959;;;349_-3F_070762 216.40 • 491 eor rr» -CKS - -'eel 1-14 ,5 se Iee rrr —CKS eo 04,41—CKS '69 41 J FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8,125.71 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER ,J 1988 CITY OF EDINA TOTAL CHECK REGISTER FUND 26 08 -15 -88 PAGE 19 10,779.97 FUND 2T TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 111,699.18 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 4,11T.37 FUND 30 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. 8 MESSAGE 93,_75_2.80 �z:2 TOTAL_ LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 31,202.83 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND ' « «« -CKS ;e� 66 228W45 08/09/88 1,273.08 WESTCO INC GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 661 -66 50572 6110 1,273.08 « -� • «« « «« ««« -CKS I'o 228452 08/09/88 1,958.30 WHEELER LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 45 - 04301 -30 047451 6235 4�1 " 11958.30 « '14 228W6] - - -- — 08/09/88 - - -- -- 43.4_2 WIDERSTROM -ANN -- - -- -- ART WORK SOLD 23 -3625- 000 -00 9 43.42- « -- - -- - - -- -- - - -- - - - - -- -- - Viz, zz « « « « «« *o*-CKS z2. `- 228W66 08/09/88 36.43 WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 646-64 ze --- 228466 -- -- - -- - -- - —- 08/09/88 - - - - -- 71.37 --`- WILLIAMS STEEL GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 646 -64 129524 In ze 122, 107.80 • -- - — -- — :o 27 21 - - - -- ,G i J3 47 40 49 5:, ' 21 — 54 136,224.12 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8,125.71 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 19,015.00 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 1,545.80 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 10,779.97 FUND 2T TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 111,699.18 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 4,11T.37 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGN PARK 29,774.61 zg," -';4e- FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 93,_75_2.80 FUND_50 TOTAL_ LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 31,202.83 FUND 60 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION FUND ' 1,800.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION i2 « «« -CKS 351° - — 41 bz —~53 5A Se i30 F 00 61 m• 08/15/88 PAGE 1 + 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. 0 MESSAGE �(- 193586 07/28/88 65.75- W W GRAINGER GEN SUPPL 27- 4504 - 663 -66 65.75 -s - rrrs *r *rr -CKS I - 214586 07728788 - b5.75 W -W GRAINGER -- -- - GEN SUPPL - - -- -- - " -- --27- 4504 - 663- 66 " " "- - -- ^ 65.75 s rrr -CKS 215M12 08/08/88 351.68 MATHISON CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 23 -4624- 613 -61 77227 351.68 -- rrs *ss rrr -CKS 228731 08/08/88 100.00 EDINA ATH. BOOSTERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 100.00 s - 228732 08/08/88 21.00 BARB BRIDGEMAN REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000-00 21.00 * - rrrsss rrr -CKS 228734 OS/08/88 9,185.00 CITY OF WOODBURY - DUES -10- 4204 - 140 -14 - - �, 91185.00 s �- 228735 08/08/88 403.00 SHARON HALE DONATIONS 23- 3265- 000 -00 +^ i 403.00 r - - rrrsss --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- -- -- - -- - -. ._ rrr -CKS -- 228737 08/08/88 392.00 EDINA FOOTBALL ASSOC SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 621 -62 392.00 -- rrrsss - rrr -CKS 228742 08/08/88 61.88 FRANCIS CALLAHAN MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 480 -48 61.88 s -,, rrrsss *** -CKS + 228745 -087 -08188 -- - -75. 00 - -MPLS CHAP 044 -SREA - - MEETING EXPENSE - - -- - -1 0 -4206- 200 -20 - - - - 75.00 s Intl -+ 228746 08%08%88 14.00 LYNDA VAN POLL - DUE FROM HRA - -- "— " -10 -1145- 000 -00 - +<,) 14.00 r <^ *o*-CKS 9, 228749 08/08/88 85.00 NWTA GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 623 -62 s: - -- - - - - -- -85.00 * - -- -- -- - - - - -- - - `!s <� 228750 08/08/88 161.82 DONNA DECONCINI AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 161 : Be - -- - - - - �Ig� 228751 08/08/88 158.89 SUSAN LEDIN AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 1988 ! OF EDINA CHECK NO_ DATE 1'I CHECK ISTER 08/15/8 'AGE AMOUNT - - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. M MESSAGE 158.89 2 ` * ** -CKS so*-CKS *** -CKS W, G f C * * * * ** .. �sr 228753 08/08/88 19.00 - -- - - - -- MARY CALGREN REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 19.00 228766 08/08/88 v 228754 08/08/88 178.40 BRYANT AIR COND REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 520 -S2 127489 -- - -- - - - -- - - -� -- -- - - --- -- - - -- - 178.40 •IA' 228767 08/08/88 19.00 D FANSLER -WALD f REG FEES 228755 08/08/88 281.59 JOHN SCHIRMANG CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 490 -49 - - - - -- +4' 281.59 08/08/88 306.00 HENN CTY COMM HEALTH FIRST AID SUPP 10 -4510- 440 -44 I" - -- 306 700-4 - -- - -- — - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - �. 228769 08/08/88 19.00 CAROL KAPSEN REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 228757 08/08/88 128.81 MN UC FUND UNEMP COMP 10 -4160- 510 -51 +�s< 128.81 228770 08/08/88 228758 08/08/88 1,081.03 30- 4201 - 781 -78 CITY OF EDINA SERVICES 10- 4201 - 508 -50 -100--00 * 1,081.03 _. 5 228759 08/08/88 141.60 AMER EXCELSIOR CO GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 647 -64 178273 6169 r 141.60 * ** -CKS 228760 08/08/88 57.15 LOWELL MCCARTHY MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 0 57.15 * 228761 08/08/88 46.50 ASSN OF ANAL CHEM GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 482 -48 062962 6181 46.50 * • 228762 08/08/88 853.74 BELSON MFG CO. MACH 6 EQUIP 27- 1340 - 000 -00 22220 853.74 i 228764; - -- 08/08/88 - -- -- -- -1 , 350: 00 EPA AUDIO VISUAL -------'-CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 10-4900-500-50 46585 1,350.00 * 2 ` * ** -CKS so*-CKS *** -CKS W, G f C .. �i * * ** - - -- -- - - -- - - — - - -- - - -- - - - -- -- - - * ** -CKS r l 228766 08/08/88 88.00 AMER RED CROSS CONFERENCE 30- 4202 - 781 -78 -- - - -- — — - -- 88.00-* -- - -- - - - -- - - -� -- -- - - --- -- - - -- - •IA' 228767 08/08/88 19.00 D FANSLER -WALD f REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 I I 19.00 ' - - - - -- +4' 228768 08/08/88 306.00 HENN CTY COMM HEALTH FIRST AID SUPP 10 -4510- 440 -44 I" - -- 306 700-4 - -- - -- — - - - - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - -- - �. 228769 08/08/88 19.00 CAROL KAPSEN REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 - - 19.00 i +�s< 228770 08/08/88 100.00 DONNA ARMISTEAD PROF SERVICES 30- 4201 - 781 -78 -100--00 * _. 5 * ** -CKS 0 d 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 3 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. N MESSAGE 228783 08/08/88 605.91 WEIS AMER FIRE EQUIP EQUIP REPLACE 10- 4901 - 440 -44 00712 6195 605.91 + • ' 228784 - 08/08/88 — - - - - -- - — — 114.48 WINDTALES GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 0838 6398 114.48 • 228785 08/08/88 286.00 A BEST BUY SIGN CO GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 286.00 • _ 228786- 08/08/88 -- 235.00 — - SHARE -- AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 23S.00 # - — - - -- - - 000-CKS 228788 08/08/88 40.00 KRISTIN LINHOFF REG FEES 10- 3500 - 000 -00 40.00 228789 08/08/88 27.10 KENT -MOORE TOOL TOOLS 10- 4580 - 560 -S6 917905 27.10 * ** -CKS • 228A10 - -- 228A10 08/08/88 08/08/88 - 4S6.23____ 145.33 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICES - -" - -- 40- 4201 - 800 -80 001069 228A10 08/08/88 145.34 ACCOUNTEMPS ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICES 50 -4201- 820 -62 001070 22BA10 08/08/88 145.34 ACCOUNTEMPS SERVICES SERVICES 50- 4201- 840 -84 001070 �i 892.24 # 50 -4201- 860 -86 001070 a - - - - - - -- - *** -CKS 228A21 08/08/88 406.99 -- ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICES 30- 4304 - 782 -78 647853 �i 228A21 228A21 08/08/88 409.66 -__ -.. - ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICES -" - 30- 4304 - 782 -78 647853 08/08/88 406.99- ADT SECURITY SYS. ALARM SERVICES 30- 4304 - 782 -78 647853 - -- -- - - -- -- - -409_ 66 * ** -CKS �• ®") 228A29 - _ 08/08/88 - 203.65------- 203.65 ALBINSON — _ _. BLUE PRINTING - -- - " - - "— " -10- 4570 - 260 -26 482355 * ** -CKS 228A32 08/08/88 92.50 ALL FIRE TEST I EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274 - 440 -44 12878 * ** -CKS s� 228A41 228A41 08/08/88 89.00 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE' CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 085482 228A41 08/08/88 08/08/88 35.60 - AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS 26- 4624 - 683 -68 386.81 AMBASSADOR SAUSAGE CONCESSIONS - - -- 27 -4624- 663 -66 .ai --------- - - - - -- - -- • •,F - * ** -CKS - 22SA49 - 08/08/88 125.68 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 10- 4262 - 628 -62 • A - - ` i 1988 Y OF EDINA CHEC1 ,ISTER 08/ 15/8. PAGE 4 ill CHECK NO. DATE — AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 125.68 + y; * « «« «« «** -CKS 228B03 08/08/88 12.72 B. R. BENSON LAUNDRY 10 -4262- 646 -64 12.72 * — -- - �+ «** -CKS w EESB07 08/08/88 189.40 BADGER METER INC REPAIR PARTS 40 -4S40- 807 -80 544774 « 189.40 « « « « *rtrt * ** -CKS 228814 08/08/88 815.00 BARRETT MOV & STOR SERVICES 10 -4236- 180 -18 2162.8 815.00 « *** -CKS :288is 08/08/88 90.90 BATTERY WAREHOUSE REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 665 -66 83662 90.90 - vY « « « « «« * ** -CKS ` r, 22SB30 08/08/88 118.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 510 -51 392412 22SB30 08/08/88 1.35 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 10- 4516- 510 -51 392966 228830 08/08/88 57.14- BERTELSON BROS. INC. CREDIT 10 -4516- 510 -51 1► 228830 08/08/88 36.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 392408 99.55 * rt « «rtrtrt *00-CKS • 228B76 08/08/88 7,957.00 BRANDOW- HOWARD INC. INSURANCE - 10 -4260- 510 -51 7,9S7.00 — - - - - - -- — - - - - - -- - - * ** -CKS 228B78 08/08/88 163.87 - -- BRISSMAN- KENNEDY 'INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 10 -4512- 520 -52 99508 C 163.87 - *** -CKS 22BB80 08/08/88 90.98 BROWNING FERRIS RUBBISH REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 628 -62 90.98 C *00-CKS C 228883 6870878 2f9 20 BRYAN -ROCK PROD. -'INC " -'-- -SAND- GRAVEL - b- ROCK- 27 =4522- 664 =66 -- 2944 - -- 6037 -- - - - y " 219.20 G ' « « « « «« - - - - - -- -- - -- - -- - - -- - -- _ _ _ s** -CKS <r 228C04 08/08/88 225.00 CAMPBELL SPORTS " SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 621 -62 9317 225.00 * _ _GENERAL — - - - -- --- - - - -._ .._ __ _ * * * * * * -- - - - - - - -- - - * ** -CKS -- - - - - - -- 4 _l 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK FEGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 5 I I CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE w 228C13 08/08/88 32.36 CASH REGISTER SAl -ES OFFICE SUPPLIES 27 -4516- 661 -66 330264 v 32.36 a ** -CKS 40 22SC33 08/08/88 1,081.03 CITY OF EDINA SERVICES 10- 4201 - 508 -50 228C33 08/08/88 1,081.03 -_ CITY OF EDINA SERVICES 10- 4201 - 508-50 228033 08/08/88 217.36 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10- 4258 - 540 -54 • 22SC33 08/08/88 394.61 CITY OF EDINA WATER 10 -4258- 646 -64 228C33 08/08/88 27.10 CITY OF EDINA WATER 50- 4258- 821 -82 228C33 08/08/88" - 27.10 — _ -- CITY OF EDINA - " WATER - 50 -4258- 861 -86 • 666.17 * ** -CKS 228C46 08/08/88 11281.05 COLOR TILE MISC 25- 4924 - 520 -52 733977 6342 - - - - - - 1 , 281.05 • -- - bba # #i *** -CKS • - 228C64 08/08/88 478.58 CONT- MINNESOTA GEN SUPPLIES 27- 4504 - 663 -66 228064 08/08/88 142.28 CONT- MINNESOTA CLEANING SUPPLIES 27- 4512 - 663 -66 228C64 - — 08/08/88 - - -- 2,320.43 - CONT= MINNESOTA CONCESSIONS - 27- 4524 - 663 -66 •. 2,941.29 - -- - - - - *** -CKS V 228C75 08/08/88 63.51 COURTNEY WAYNE C; MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 100 -10 - - - - -- 63.51 - * - - -- - - - -- -- - - * ** -CKS y 228C87 08/08/88 69.48 CURTIN MATHESON SCI GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 701119 69.48 a 000-CKS 228D03 08/08/88 21658.00- -_ - - -- D 6 V SALES FEN GSUPPLIES - - " - -30- 4504 - 782 -78 31672 5778 2,658.00 - -- - - -i -.. -- -- - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - _ *** -CKS I 22SD33 08/08/88 504.00 DAVIS- EUGENE "' SERVICES 10 -4201- 600 -60 22SD33 _ _ 08%08/88 - - 504.00 - - --` DAVIS- EUGENE PROF SERVICES -' -" ___._____.10-4201-600-60 " - - "'- 10 -4201- 600 -60 C I 22SD33 08/08/88 44.55 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE 10 -4208- 600 -60 n' 22SD33 08/08/88 50.62 DAVIS- EUGENE MILEAGE 10- 4208- 600 -60 ` - -- -- 1 , 1 03. -1T-* s - V i *** -CKS 228D47 08/08/88 11.93 DEPENDABLE COURIER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 113975 �•,� 11.93 ----------- - - - - -- -- * * * * ** -- -- _ * ** -CKS � - -- - 7, 7 .7 e r., 1 1988 Y OF EDINA CHE0 ,ISTER 08/15/8. PAGE 6 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. s P.O. 0 MESSAGE 22SD65 08/08/88 2,133.44 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS 26 -4564- 682 -68 297112 228DG5 08/08/88 845.35 DIXIE PETRO -CHEM INC CHEMICALS 26 -4564- 682 -68 296667 4706 6, - 2,978.79 C rrrrr* *** -CKS 228E14 08/08/88 262.20 EARL F. ANDERSON SERVICES 10 -4201- 647 -64 81463 228E14 08/08/88 390.95 EARL F. ANDERSON GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 10- 4546- 343 -30 81333 653.15 *** -CKS :28E23 08/08/88 25.63 ECONOMIC PRESS DUES 10- 4204 - 140 -14 25.63 a � C *** *+ *** -CKS 22SE69 08/08/88 27.00. ELSMORE AQUATIC SAFETY EQUIP 26 -4642- 681 -68 7451 27.00 ® ****r* *** -CKS 2e8E71 08/08/88 366.e6 ------ ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 440 -44 88203 366.26 *** -CKS 228E78 08/08/88 195.04 EMRICH BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 27 -4624- 663 -66 195.04--* - -- - -- - 1 ****** *** -CKS 228F19 08/08/88 543.25 FIRST TRUST DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 228F19 08/08/88 503.75 FIRST TRUST DUE FROM HRA 10- 1145-000 -00 228F19.- - - 08%08/88 - -- - - 491.75- - —FIRST TRUST INT BONDS 66-4300- 000 -00 1,538.75 - a*a-CKS . �'- ! 228F47 08/08/88 135.93 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 81148 -- 135.93 x - ! **** ** ***-CKS 228G29 08/08/88 269.27 GENERAL REPAIR SERV REPAIR'PARTS 40- 4540 - 801 -80 605 269.27 ® 228G30 08/08/88 33.00 GENERAL SPORTS GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -62 29577 6447 33.00 ! *** -CKS ! 228G42 08706%88 -- - - -- - -._- - 144- .-40 -- -- --- - - -GIL HEBARD GUNS _ _..- .'TAR GETS ' -- ___..._---- - - - - -_ _. 29- 4648 - 722 -72 53041 6179 ® 144.40 ,t ;g. � 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 7 CHECK N0, DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE ` * * * * ** * ** -CKS •. 228G68 08/08/88 267.21 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 322 -30 627531 228J14 08/08/88 - 267.21 + CHEMICALS 10- 4564 - 783 -78 088626 6283 228J14 08/08/88 168.75 JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 30- 4564 - 783 -78 088626 6283 168.75 228G94 08/08/88 13.50 GUSTAVE LARSON CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 10 -4504- 540 -54 55750 228G94 08/08/88 185.98 GUSTAVE LARSON CO. REPAIR PARTS 50-4540-821 -82 55540 �.__. 199.48 + V = 22SJ27 08/08/88 17.42 JERRY S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLY 23- 4504 - 613 -61 s 228H32 08/08/88 270.00 HEDGES -DIANA PROF SERVICES 23 -4201- 611 -61 • 228H32 08/08/88 48.00 HEDGES-DIANA COST OF GOODS SOLD 23-4624- 613 -61 318.00 + ,. 228H34 08/08/88 150.00 HENN COUNTY TREAS. RUBB REMOVAL 10 -4250- 644 -64 13364 228H34 08/08/88 16.81 HENN COUNTY TREAS. PRINTING 10- 4600- 180 -18 166.81 + * * * * ** 228H62 08/08/88 12.35 HOFF WILLIAMSON GEN SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 180 -18 236653 �d 12.35 + 228H63 _____0S/08/SS--- - 174.50 ____HOFFERS INC. - - - FIELD MARKING - 10- 4563- 642 -64 40184 228H63 08/08/88 174.50 HOFFERS INC. FIELD MARKING 10- 4563 - 642 -64 40690 228H63 08/08/88 174.50 HOFFERS INC. FIELD MARKING 10- 4563- 642 -64 40049 228H63 08/08/88 174.50- HOFFERS INC. FIELD MARKING - 10- 4563- 643 -64 40049 22BH63 08/08/88 174.50 HOFFERS INC. FIELD MARKING 10- 4563- 643 -64 40049 523.50 22SH89 08%08/88 101.52 -- - -. - -_ HYDRAULIC SERVICE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27- 4248 - 664 -66 26934 A +' 1ot.s2 + 22AI49 08/08/88 22.19 INMAC DATA PROCESSING 10 -4233- 560 -56 310310 -- 22. 19 * - - - — -- * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS * ** -CKS *** -CKS *++ -CKS C M 22SJ14 08/08/88 168.75 JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 10- 4564 - 783 -78 088626 6283 228J14 08/08/88 168.75- JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 10- 4564 - 783 -78 088626 6283 228J14 08/08/88 168.75 JACOBSON SUPPLY CHEMICALS 30- 4564 - 783 -78 088626 6283 168.75 - i *ate ** ----- - - - - -- *00-CKS - - - - - -- - - -- — - -- V = 22SJ27 08/08/88 17.42 JERRY S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLY 23- 4504 - 613 -61 s C M vI ` 1988 f OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 08 /15 /8k )AGE B CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. • MESSAGE 17.42 + it * * * * ** * ** -CKS 228J35 08/08/88 72.56 JERRYS PRINTING PRINTING 10- 4600- 180 -18 1088 72.56 • �. * ** -CKS r 228K35 08/08/88 31.47 KNOX LUMBER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 622 -62 626105 6239 228K35 08/08/88 60.62 KNOX LUMBER CO. REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 626494 6225 228K35 08/08/88 377.56 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 626647 6351 228K35 08/08/88 111.56 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 10- 4604- 646 -64 626617 6290 228K35 08/08/88 99.95 KNOX LUMBER CO. LUMBER 27- 4604- 662 -66 634472 6327 ! 681.16 * ** -CKS 228L22 08/08/88 1,474.00 LANDSCAPE d TURF SOD d BLACK DIRT 27- 4562 - 664 -66 3315 6265 1,474.00 • r * * * * ** *** -CKS 22BL30 ----08/08/88 - 4,800.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 16090 r 228L30 08/08/88 91095.00 LAYNE MINNESOTA CO. REPAIR PARTS 40-4540-801 -80 16089 6103 13,895.00 C v * * * * *s *04,-CKS 22BL38 08/08/88 -- - - 320.00 -- — -_ LEITNER COMPANY - SOD d BLACK DIRT _ 27 -4562- 664 -66 r 320.00 C - - - * ** -CKS M 228L80 08/08/88 71.89 LYNDALE GARDEN CTR GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 643 -64 3179 71:89 o -- - - - -- -- - - - - - -- r * ** -CKS ,r 228M19 08/08/88 205.24 MCGUIRE AUTO SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 27 -4540- 664 -66 205.24 r * * * * ** o**-CKS f 22SM27 08/08/88 89.00 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 643 -64 19652 r '! 228M27 08/08/88 461.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 645-64 19534 228M27 08/08/88 471.50 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 645 -64 19691 228M27 _08/0S/S8________84. 00 MERIT SUPPLY -" - - " - - " -- "GENERAL SUPPLY - - - - -- - 27- 4504 - 662 -66 19686 6339 r 228M27 08/08/88 358.50 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19651 228M27 08/08/88 940.00 MERIT SUPPLY GEN SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 782 -78 19653 2,404.50 *** -CKS �.• 228M29 08/08/88 202.00 MESSERLI d KRAMER AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 i �I 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 9 l CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. R MESSAGE 228M29 08/08/88 549.87 MESSERLI & KRAMER AMBULANCE 10- 3180 - 000 -00 751.87 rr * *rr ** *-CKS 228M37 08108/88 32.00 - - - -- MGCSA - -- GENERAL SUPPLIES - 27- 4504 - 664 -66 32.00 rrr *rr * ** -CKS b 228M44 08/08/88 330.65 MIDWEST CHEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 21986 6057 . 330.65 r -- - - y ra *rsr * ** -CKS • 228M58 08/08/88 267.41 MILLIPORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 482 -48 69537 6111 267.41 • rrrarr r ** -CKS 228M68 08%08/88 230.93 MN. CELLULAR TEL. DUES 10 -4204- 140 -14 • 230.93 rrrrrr - — - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - **o-CKS • • 22SM70 08/08/88 241.25 MN. CONWAY EQUIP MAINT 10- 4274- 440 -44 118763 241.25 rrrrrr rrr -CKS 22SM80 08/08/88 106.56 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210 - 140 -14 228M80 08/08/88 103.10 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 10- 4210-140 -14 228M80 08/08/88 29.88 MN. SUBURBAN NEWS ADVERTISING 23-4214- 611 -61 49505 r.y 239.54 - 22SMSi— 08/08/88 -- 146:97 - - -MN:- "TORO INC. - -- REPAIR PARTS- - - - - - -- 27- 4540 - 664 -66 718223 228M81 08/08/88 65.35 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 720433 228M81 08/08/88 52.08- MN. TORO INC. CREDIT 27- 4540 - 664 -66 C88257 ` 22BM81 08/08/88 - - 121.87- - - -MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS------ - - - - -.- 27 -4540- 664 -66 720451 © 228M81 08/08/88 41.41 MN. TORO INC. REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 718953 ` 323.52 r •. araa ** * ** -CKS e 228M92 08/08/88 34.70 - MONARCH MARKETING OFFICE SUPPLIES 50- 4516 - 860 -86 552368 41 34.70 I' sraeas - -- -- - -- - - - -- -- --- - - - - -- -- - -- - -... - - - -- - - - - - - - -- - -- - -- - - - r* *-CKS e. 22SN22 08/08/88 218.35 NAATL GUARDIAN SYS. ALARM SERVICES 50- 4304 - 841 -84 65397 218.35 *a* -CKS ��.i 22SN31 08/08/88 25.50 NEBCO DISTRIBUTING CONCESSIONS 26- 4624- 683 -68 43273 v 1988 Y OF EDINA CHECI ;ISTER 08/15/8, PAGE 10 ` CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. # MESSAGE ie 25.50 ** *-CKS e 228N82 08/0.8/88 42.84 NW GRAPHIC SUPPLY SALES 23- 3625 - 000 -00 150662 6042 ` 42.84 * *A:Xrk *++ -CKS 228P03 08/08/88 15.00 PACE LAB CONTRACTED REPAIRS 40 -4248- 801 -80 24192 a 15.00 * e * * +a •* *-CKS a 228P42 08/08/88 275.00 PHYSICIANS HEALTH AMBULANCE 10 -3180- 000 -00 p 275.00 a * ** -CKS as 228P56 08/08/88 118.05 PLASTIC BAGMART GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 507 -50 3236 • 118.05 � v ** *-CKS ,® 228P58 08/08/86 27.20 PLUNKETTS GEN SUPPLY 28 -4504- 702 -70 517134 n 27.20 * * *3* *** -CKS '. 228P83__ ._ - 08/08/88 - __ 1 1786. 20 ---- . - - - - "- -PROCESS SYS CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80, E30904 6152 1,786.20 228P84 08/08/88 16.50 PRO INSTANT PRINT PRINTING - 30- 4600 - 781 -78 17354 ® 16.50 0 * ** -CKS 228P94 08/08/88 15.00 PUBLICITY CENTRAL ADVERTISING 30- 4214 - 781 -78 1808 a * *s -CKS ® 228R15 08/08/88 570.53 RAINBOW LEASING EQUIP RENTAL 10 -4226- 507- 50- M61020 228RIS 08/09/88 570.53 RAINBOW LEASING EQUIP RENTAL 10- 4226 - SOT -50 M61021 1,141.06 � 4 * * * * ** * ** -CKS ® 228R17 08/08/88 12.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMB. PERMIT 10- 3110 - 000 -00 12.00 - - -- 228R22 "- _ -. -_- - 06708788' - -- -- - 182.56 - - .-- _ - - -'- -REM SUPPLIES _._._ .___. _.- _ -. -- GENERAL SUPPLIES - 30- 4504 - 782 -78 182.56 ... _. —__ ____ __ .. - 7�,... I`Y lkt� t .�v11. y. G 1� (� 1� �, Y - 1 C, 1. i lop 39 H?47 h. :�• � N:I 1 I � 77, , aM .rii +t Y 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 11 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE « * » * ** * ** -CKS • 228R24 08/08/88 65.94 RELIABLE OFF SUPPLIES 10 -4516- 510 -51 132200 228824 08/08/88 54.95 RELIABLE OFF SUPPLIES 10- 4516 - 510 -51 364300 120.89 M- - -- - -- 228R2S 08/08/88 224.40 RENTAL EQUIP 6 SALES TOOLS 10- 4580 - 644 -64 8855 228R25 08/08/88 97.20 RENTAL EQUIP 6 SALES LAUNDRY 40-4262- 801 -80 8857 321.60 * **s -CKS 228S16 08/08/88 123.23 SEARS ROEBUCK & CO TOOLS 10 -4580- 440 -44 228516 08/08/88 21.19- SEARS ROEBUCK 6 CO TOOLS 10-4580- 440 -44 • 102.04 » »s »a# - - - -- - - -- -- -- - -- - -- - - - - -- -- - - - _ - -- -- - - - -.. *** -CKS .. 228S20 08/08/88 256.00 SEIDEL- ROXANNE PROF SERVICES 30 -4201- 781 -78 228$20 08/08/88 256.00 SEIDEL- ROXANNE PROF SERVICES 30-4201- 781 -78 512.00 » » »»«» — -- - - -- - — - - - - - - -- »»» -CKS 228534 08/08/88 45.00 SOUTHDALE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 6144 228534 08/08/88 362.17 SOUTHDALE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 5967 228534 08/08/88 107.18 SOUTHDALE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 560 -56 228534 08/08/88 321.60 SOUTHDALE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4248- 560 -56 6128 228534 - - -- 08/08/88 -- - -' 100.00 -- - - SOUTHDALE FORD - CONTRACTED REPAIRS - 10- 4248 - 560 -56 53027 228534 08/08/88 259.90 SOUTHDALE FORD CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10-4248- 560 -56 7643 22SS34 08/08/88 106.92 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 27044 228534 08/08/88 5.23 SOUTHDALE FORD REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 1,308.00 ess ** -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - *** -CKS 228578 08/08/88 7.43 SUBURBAN PLUMB SUP GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682 -68 335176 7.43 O � * *s « «s i ** -CKS 228383 08/08/88 6.89 SUPERAMERICA GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 6.89 » s *s -CKS — 228S9E 08/ 08788 - -_- ____43.-44_----- SYSTEM SUPPLY - - GENERAL SUPPLIES - - -- 10- 4504 - 440 -44 070974 0 228592 08/08/88 100.00 SYSTEM SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 510 -51 070974 143.44 » *s* -CKS 228S96 08!08788 80 00= SCHUENEMAN -AMY -- " - - - - -- SERVICES - -- -27- 4201 - 662 -16 809 -- -- -- - • t! 228596 08/08/88 80.00 SCHUENEMAN -AMY SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -16 809 .. s 1988 ! OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 08/15 /88 'AGE 12 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 228S96 08/08/88 80.00 SCHUENEMAN -AMY SERVICES 27- 4201 - 662 -66 0810 5752 228596 08/08/88 80.00 SCHUENEMAN -AMY SERVICES 27 -4201- 662 -66 809 160.00 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 228T01 08/08/88 14.95 TANDY CONSUMER SERV. GENERAL SUPPLIES 10- 4540 - 520 -52 104896 5676 14.95 * * * * * ** * ** -CKS 228T05 08/08/88 69.00 TAYSTEE BAKING CO. CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 1907 5467 69.00 * * * * * ** **o-CKS 228T10 08/08/88 247.50 TERRY ANN SALES CO. GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 12322 6445 228T10 08/08/88 380.25 TERRY ANN SALES CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 2T- 4504- 663 -66 12307 5417 627.75 22ST11 08/08/88 472.00 TESSMAN SEED 6 CHEM. SEED 10- 4568 - 642 -64 141944 472.00 -- - — - - - - *** -CKS IdW 228T20 08/08/88 296.20 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 10- 4600 - 628 -62 7443 228T20 08/08/88 77.80 THE PRINT SHOP PRINTING 23- 4600- 611 -61 7433 374.00 - - - — - -- - - - - - -- - -- - * ** -CKS 228T28 08/08/88 232.82 THOMPSON LUMBER CO. BUILDINGS 29 -1320- 000 -00 211374 232.82 228T29 08/08/88 12,934.64 THOMSEN- NYBECK LEGAL SERVICES 10-4201- 220 -22 228T29 08/08%88 10,340.54 ------ THOMSEN- NYBECK` - -- LEGAL SERVICES - - -- - 10- 4201- 220 -22 23,275.18 *00-CKS v 228T42 08/08/88 35.60 TOOLS BY OLSEN REPAIR PARTS 27- 4540 - 664 -66 12371 -- - — -- - - -- -- -- - -35.60 * — — - - - * ** -CKS v 228T53 08/08/88 6,080.26 TRACY OIL GASOLINE 10 -4612- 560 -56 T2266 6292 6,080.26 r * * * * ** *** -CKS 228T72 08/08/88 22.40 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 8597 5483 228T72 08/08/88 146.16 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CONCESSIONS 26 -4624- 683 -68 8602 228772 08/08/88 46.40 TROPICAL SNO OF MN CREDIT 26- 4624 - 683 -68 8441 5483 I'I 228T72 08708188 46:40 = TROPICAL - -SNO OF MN "- — - CREDIT - -- - - - - -26 -4624- 683 -68 8441 -- 5483 - v 228772 08/08/88 46.60- TROPICAL SNO OF MN CREDIT 26- 4624- 683 -68 8441 5483 .. s i 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 08/15/88 PAGE 13 CHECK NO. DATE _ AMOUNT - VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. 4 MESSAGE !r 121.96 ► * * * *s* * ** -CKS 228782 _ 08/08/88 _ 55.85 TWIN CITY ELEVATOR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10- 4248 - 520 -52 11147 55.85 - * * * * ** !- 228U25 08/08/88 224.00 UNIVERSAL MED SERV EQUIP NEW 10- 4902 - 440 -44 807036 224.00 *** -CKS 228V43 08/08/88 384.00 VERSATILE VEHICLE LEASE LINES 27 -4276- 665 -66 656 6341 kr 384.00 _ -. * ** -CKS 228V80 08/08/88 93.84 - VOSS ELECTRIC SUP GENERAL SUPPLY 10- 4504 - 520 -52 237005 93.84 # -- b " * * * * ** — - - - -- - - - -- - -- * ** -CKS ♦,- 228W08 08/08/88 336.35 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 540 -54 815944 228W08 08/08/88 323.80 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540- 646 -64 662395 ` 228WO8 08/08/88 332.76 W.W. GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 662387 b ' 992.91 . _ ----------- -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - -- -- - - -- -- - - -- -- - -- - - - -- - -- --- ** *-CKS r 228W11 08/08/88 336.63 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27- 4612- 664 -66 1822 22SW11 08/08/88 320.00 W. GORDON SMITH GASOLINE 27-4612- 664 -66 1836 656.63 - - - -- -- -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- --._ _.._ - -- - -_ .----- ------ - - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- * ** -CKS 228W25 08/08/88 774.77 WASTE MGMT- SAVAGE RUB REMOVAL 10- 4250 - 645 -64 774. 77 * - r, - - * * * * ** ------ - - - - -- - -- i ** -CKS ` 22SW44 08/08/88 213.79 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. WELDING SUPPLY 10- 4610 - 560 -56 73386 213.7-9--* t .:I * * * *►* __ --- - -- _ -- *** -CKS 1 228W55 -- 08/08/88 -- - -- 1,500.00-- - -' - -- -WHITE -OAK- GALLERY - CONTRACTED SERVICES -- 10 -4200- 500 -SO - - - - - 1! 1,500.00 1 * ** -CKS M 22SW71 08/08/88 1,136.50 WINFIELD DEVEL. SERVICES 10- 4201 - 627 -62 000339 1 ---- ------------- - - - - -- - -- - - * ** -CKS --- -- i198b ,Y OF EDINA CHEC, SISTER 08/15/5 PAGE 14 CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT _ — VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE • 22SU76 08/08/88 37.50 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY OFFICE SUPPLIES 27- 4516 - 661 -66 61778 37.50 * * ** -CKS a 228205 08/08/88 13.55 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLY 27- 4504 - 662 -66 477269 13.55 * * * *,* * ** -CKS 71,891.78 FUND 10 TOTAL ; GENERAL FUND 1,240.62 FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 11281.05 FUND 25 TOTAL CAPITAL FUND 3,354.28 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND 91811.01 FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND 27.20 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 377.22 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND 5,485.93 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 16,708.30 FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 929.24 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND 491.75 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 111,598.38 TOTAL • • • -- - -- - - — - -- - - - -- R k.11 1968 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER �... CHECK-NO.-DATE------ _ AMOUNT r 159P20 08/04/88 147.92 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 159P20 08/04/88 5.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 152.92 V �. 183L98 08/05/88 187560 08/05/88 ♦. 50.00 ED MACHOLDA 50.00 56.00 STATE OF MN 56.00 L.I 07 -31 -88 PAGE 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL **o-CKS TELEPHONE 26- 1030 - 000 -00 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10 -4310- 560 -56 * ** -CKS MANUAL * * * * ** o**-CKS _ POWER_ d _ 10 -1130- 000 -00 MANUAL POWER 10-4252- 301 -30 188N16 _. _ 08/05/88 _ 771.05 _ NSP 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL 188N16 08/05/88 569.61 NSP MANUAL d' 188N16 08/05/88 89.78 NSP POWER 188N16 _ .. _ 08/05/88 _ 5.95 ___ __ NSP POWER 18SN16 08/05/88 2,787.25 _ NSP _ 10- 4252 - 375 -30 188N16 08/05/88 49.96 NSP 10- 4252 - 440-44 MANUAL 188N16_ 08/05/88 - 124.56 _ _ _ 1 0 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL 188N16 08/05/88 1,703.43 NSP d 188N16 08/05/88 806.02 NSP POWER _ _ 168N16 ._. 08/OS/88 _ _ - 45.10 NSP.____. 23- 4252 - 612 -61 188N16 08/05/88 27.11 NSP Z6 -4Z5Z- 681-68 •0' 188N16 08/05/88 1,666.39 NSP MANUAL __ 188N16 __08/05/88 _- __6,984.46 NSP____ POWER 188N16 08/05/88 509.11 N8P POWER_________ 'd 188N16 08/05/88 1,082.13 NSP 30- 425E - 782 -78 188N16 _._ -__ 06/05/88 _ __. 3, 678.81 NSP - MANUAL 188N16 08/05/88 305.16 NSP MANUAL d 188N16 08/05/88 4,162.14 NSP POWER 188N16_ 08/05/88_ - 202.21 POWER - 18SN16 08/05/88 9,532.96 NSP d 188N16 08/05/88 2,405.72 NSP 50 -4252- 841 -84 MANUAL 188N16 08/08/88 - _ -- - . 41 -- - __- - NSP MANUAL 188N16 08/05/88 .41 NSP 188N16 08/08/88 41,631.97 NSP MEETING EXPENSE 188N16 08/05/88 1 MEETING EXPENSE _ 10 -4202- 140 -14 188N16 08/05/88 737.86 NSP 10 -4202- 140 -14 %0' 188N16 08/05/88 1,669.84 NSP MANUAL 1 188N16 __._- 08/05/88 - 598.95___..__ MANUAL j EXPENSE _ 10 -4202- 600 -60 85,053.70 MEETING �a-1 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL — - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - -- - d 189724 08/05/88 5.00 PETTY CASH 189724 .. _- 08/05/88 3.30 - _ _._ PETTY CASH j 189724 08/05/88 3.68 PETTY CASH d ' 189724 08/05/88 30.00 PETTY CASH ___189724_ _08/05/88 12.00 PETTY CASH i•� 189724 08/05/88 19.66 PETTY _ CASH 0-1 ,7 189724 08/05/88 11.00 PETTY CASH L.I 07 -31 -88 PAGE 1 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL **o-CKS TELEPHONE 26- 1030 - 000 -00 MANUAL TELEPHONE 10 -4310- 560 -56 * ** -CKS MANUAL o**-CKS _ POWER_ _ 10 -1130- 000 -00 MANUAL POWER 10-4252- 301 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 321 -30 MANUAL , POWER .10- 4252 - 322-30 _ MANUAL POWER 10 -4252- 330 -30 MANUAL POWER 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 358 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 375 -30 MANUAL POWER 10- 4252 - 440-44 MANUAL POWER _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 0 -4252- 460 -46 MANUAL POWER 10 -4252- 520 -52 MANUAL POWER 10-4252 - 540 -54 MANUAL POWER _ _ _ _ 1 0 -425E- 646 -64 MANUAL POWER 23- 4252 - 612 -61 MANUAL POWER Z6 -4Z5Z- 681-68 MANUAL 4 POWER _- 27- 4252 - 662 -66 MANUAL POWER 27 -4252- 664-66 MANUAL POWER 25-4ZS2-702-70 MANUAL POWER_________ _ 29- 4252 - 722 -72 MANUAL_ POWER 30- 425E - 782 -78 MANUAL POWER 40 -4252- 801 -80 MANUAL POWER _ _ 40- 4252 - 803 -80 MANUAL POWER 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL. POWER 40 -4252- 803 -80 MANUAL POWER - - -- 40 -4252- 804 -80 MANUAL POWER 50- 4252 - 821 -82 -- - -- MANUAL POWER 50 -4252- 841 -84 MANUAL POWER_____,__- _____, 50- 4252 - 861 -86 MANUAL * ** -CKS MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4202 - 140 -14 MANUAL 1 MEETING EXPENSE _ 10 -4202- 140 -14 MANUAL MEETING EXPENSE 10 -4202- 140 -14 MANUAL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4202 - 140 -14 MANUAL 1 MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4202- SO7 -50 MANUAL MEETING EXPENSE _ 10 -4202- 600 -60 MANUAL MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 140 -14 MANUAL 1988 OF EDINA CHECK ISTER 07 -31 -8. AGE 2 I CHECK NO. DATE_._ - AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV._N P.O. 9 MESSAGE r` 189724 08/05/88 3.99 PETTY CASH MILEAGE 10- 4208 - 160 -16 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 2.80 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 100 -10 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 16.43 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 3.15 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 490 -49 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 98.88 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 6.42 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL " 189724 08/05/88 3.00 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 1.67 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 .85 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 15.79 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 _ 08/05/88 _ _ 8.38 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 21.00 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 10.00 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 9.76 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 6.32 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 2.75 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 28.54 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 26- 4504- 682 -68 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 11.35 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 683 -68 MANUAL 189724 08/05/88 2.22 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 40 -4504- 801 -80 MANUAL - - - -- -- - - 337.94o - - __ ••••• ••• -CKS r 189727 08/05/88 150.00 MN DEPT OF NAT RES PERMIT FEE 10 -4200- 358 -30 MANUAL 150.00 • I *•" *�• ••• -CKS � c _ 189A84_ 08/05/88 _ ---- 8.87 AT&T ._ _ TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 189A84 08/05/88 6.00 AT6T TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 16.87 • •••••• ••• -CKS 1 89U27 ___ 08/05/88 _ _ 31 0.87 - _ _ NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE _ - _ _ 1 0 -4201- 622 -66 MANUAL 189U27', 08/05/88 3,097.17 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 10- 4256 - 510 -51 MANUAL 1. 189U27 08/05/88 159.39 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 23-4256 - 612 -61 MANUAL 189U2T 08/05/88 _ 38.07 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE ._ Z6- 4256 - 682 -68 MANUAL 189UET 08/05/88 109.71 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 28- 4256- T02 -70 MANUAL V 18SUET 08/05/88 37.97 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 29- 4256 - TEE -72 MANUAL 189U2708/05/88 114.15 ______NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 30 -42S6- 782 -78 MANUAL 189U27 08/05/88 104.37 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 40 -4256- 801 -80 MANUAL l.� 189U27 08/05/88 134.09 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 50- 4256- 821 -B2 MANUAL 189U27 _ 08/05/88 163.17 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE _ _ 50-4256- 841 -84 MANUAL 189U27 08/05/88 110.44 NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL 4,399.40 s � « « « «� -- -- - -- -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - - -- ••• -CKS i. 19OB73 _ _- 08/05/88 8.00 -_ -_- BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 3440 - 000 -00 MANUAL 190873 08/05/88 544.35 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4120- 663 -66 MANUAL ~ 190873 08/05/88 340.32 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4120- 666 -66 MANUAL ' " 190B73 08/05/88 20.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4202 - 661 -66 MANUAL 190873 08/05/88 25.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4204- 661 -66 _ MANUAL 190873 08/05/88 25.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4290- 661 -66 MANUAL I\- 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 3 ,• CHECK NO ._ DATE -__ AMOUNT _ -- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION -. ACCOUNT N0. INV. M P.O. N MESSAGE 190873 08/05/88 26.88 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4504- 663 -66 MANUAL 190873 OB /OS /8B 20.88 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4516 - 661 -66 MANUAL 190873 08/05/88 107.15 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27- 4600-661 -66 MANUAL 190873 08/05/88 93.80 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 27 -4624- 663 -66 MANUAL - - _ 1,211.38 • ••• -CKS 190C33 08/05/88 118,000.00- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL 19OC33 08/05/88 118,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50- 1010 - 000 -00 MANUAL ` .00 • ••• -CKS 190F14 08/05/88 13,569.61 FIDELITY BANK CITY PORTION FICA 10 -4149- 510 -51 MANUAL 19OF14 08/05/88 882.98 FIDELITY BANK CITY PAID MEDICARE 10-4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL — -- - - - 14,452.59 • ••••a• ••• -CKS 194803 08/05/88 1.00 NAOMI JOHNSON PROF SERVICES 23 -4201- 611 -61 MANUAL 194803 08/05/88 E.70 NAOMI JOHNSON MILEAGE E3- 4208 - 611 -61 MANUAL 194803 _ 10.00 NAOMI JOHNSON ADVERTISING 23 -4214- 611 -61 MANUAL 194803 08/05/88 16.00 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES E3 -4504- 611 -61 MANUAL 194803 08/05/88 7.74 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES 23- 4504 - 612 -61 MANUAL 194803 08/05/88 34.81 NAOMI JOHNSON SUPPLIES E3 -4588- 611 -61 MANUAL IF 72.25 • - -- - -- - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - ••• -CKS 194H83 08/05/88 70,000.00 HRA HRA TRANSFER 10- 1145 - 000 -00 MANUAL _- -_ TO, 000. 00 • •••••• ••• -CKS 194M24 08/05/88 9,732.37 MED CTR HEALTH CITY HOSP PREMIUM 10 -4156- 510 -51 MANUAL 9,732.37 • -- ••• -CKS• 194P32___ 08/05/88 23,006.63 PERA CITY PORTION_PERA 1.0 -4145- 510- 5f MANUAL 23,006.63 • _ - - - - ••• -CKS 195700 08/05/88 236.00 J THOMAS NELSON PROF SERVICES 23 -4201- 611 -61 MANUAL - -.- - 236.00 • ••• -CKS J 195J31 08/05/88 6.82 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 180 -18 MANUAL 195J31 08/05/88 3.99 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 260 -E6 MANUAL 1 95J31 08/05/88 --30.14- JERRY3_HARDWARE _____ ___ SUPPLIES 1 0- 4504 - 260 -26 MANUAL 195J31 195J31- 08/OS /88 83.98 JERRYS HARDWARE __________ SUPPLIES _ __ 10- 4504 - 301 -30 ____ _ MANUAL V-! 08/05/88 1.92 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 MANUAL - — — — _f 1988 OF EDINA vi 10- 4504 - 301 -30 MANUAL 14.98 CHECK NO, DATE r 195J31 08/08/88 19.98 19SJ31 08/05/88 GEN SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 _ 195J31 08/08/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 06/08/88 9.43 195J31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 9.10 195J31 08/08/88 GEN SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 37.39 19SJ31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/08/88 22.10 195J31 08/05/88 ` 195J31 08/05/88 4.01 195J31 08/08/88 GEN SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 _ 195J31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/08/88 _ 4.67 195J31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 6.30 19SJ31 08/05/88 GEN SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 23.56 195J31 08/08/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/08/88 4.00 195J31 08/08/88 ti 19SJ31 08/05/88 28.52 19SJ31 08/09/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 41.22 195J31 08/05/88 GEN SUPPLIES _ __ 195J31 08/09/88 11.98 195J31 08/05/88 ti 19SJ31 08/08/88 52.61 19SJ31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 132.81 19SJ31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 - 08/05/88 - 11.65 19SJ31 - 08/05/68 SUPPLIES 19SJ31 08/05/86 33.91 195J31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/05/88 ' 19SJ31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 _ 08/05/88 26.27 _ _ 195J31 08/08/88 SUPPLIES 195J31 08/08/88 26.27 195J31 08/05/88 SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 641 -64 MANUAL 30.58 196P70 08/03/88 SUPPLIES 10 -4SO4- 642 -64 MANUAL 34.36 197A82 ---6-8- AO5/88 SUPPLIES 197A82 08/05/88 A CHECK ISTER AMOUNT VENDOR 07 -31 -8 AGE 4 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. 0 MESSAGE 9.71 JERRY$ HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 301 -30 MANUAL 14.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 322 -30 MANUAL 19.98 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 325 -30 MANUAL 6.53 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 325 -30 MANUAL 9.43 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 390 -30 MANUAL 9.10 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 390 -30 MANUAL 37.39 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 MANUAL 22.10 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 440 -44 MANUAL 4.01 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 440 -44 MANUAL 45.15 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 MANUAL 4.67 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 507 -50 MANUAL 6.30 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 MANUAL 23.56 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10-4504- 520 -52 MANUAL 4.00 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 520 -52 MANUAL 28.52 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 540 -54 MANUAL 41.22 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 560 -56 MANUAL 11.98 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 560 -56 MANUAL 52.61 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -62 MANUAL 132.81 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 11.65 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 MANUAL 33.91 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 630 -62 MANUAL 26.27- JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504-640 -64 MANUAL 26.27 _ _ JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 640 -64 MANUAL 26.27 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 641 -64 MANUAL 30.58 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10 -4SO4- 642 -64 MANUAL 34.36 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10-4504- 643 -64 MANUAL 245.03 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 MANUAL 1T1.10- JERRYS HARDWARE SUrrLIES 10-4504- 646 -64 MANUAL 60.30 __ JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 646 -64 MANUAL 1.49 JERRYS HARDWARE _ _ GEN SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 660-68 MANUAL 9.59 JERRYS HARDWARE 3UrPLIE5 10-4504 - 660 -66 MANUAL 11.80 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS _ 10- 4540 - 540 -54 MANUAL 36.82 JERRYS HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 646 -64 MANUAL 280.00 JERRYS HARDWARE LAWN MOWER 10-4901 - 440 -44 MANUAL 171.91-______.JERRYS HARDWARE LAWN MOWER 10- 4901- 440-44 MANUAL 15.80 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 26- 4504 - 682-68 MANUAL 30.63 JERRYS HARDWARE CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27 -4248- 664-66 MANUAL _ 111.12 _ _._ JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 27-4504-662 -66 MANUAL 51.51 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 27 -4504- 664 -66 MANUAL 16.15 JERRYS HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 28- 4504 - 702 -70 MANUAL _ 12.15 JERRYS HARDWARE SUPPLIES 29- 4504 - 722 -72 MANUAL 51.89 JERRYS HARDWARE _ SUPPLIES 40 -4504- 801 -80 MANUAL 25.18 JERRY HARDWARE GEN SUPPLIES 40- 4504 - 801 -80 MANUAL _. 25.99 ---.--..JERRYS-HARDWARE REPAIR PARTS 40 -4540- 803 -80 MANUAL 1,389.31 • ** -CKS 135.00 POSTMASTER BULK MAIL 10- 4290 - 510 -51 MANUAL 135.00 * _ *** -CKS .46 AT &T - - - TELEPHONE - - -- 10- 4201 - 622 -62 MANUAL 55.66 AT &T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 510 -51 MANUAL v c 0 i 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 5 ��- CHECK NO. DATE_ - -_ AMOUNT __-- _- ___.__. VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION - .. - ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. M MESSAGE 197A82 08/05/88 .46- AT&T TELEPHONE 10- 4256- 622 -66 MANUAL 197A82 08/05/88 .46 AT&T TELEPHONE 10 -4256- 622 -66 MANUAL 197A82 08/05/88 .75 AT&T TELEPHONE 23-4256- 612-61 MANUAL Os 197A82 08/05/88 3.31 AT&T TELEPHONE 26- 4256-682 -68 MANUAL 197A82 _ 08/08/88 3.84 AT&T TELEPHONE 27- 4256-662 -66 MANUAL 197A82 08/05/68 29.72 AT&T TELEPHONE 27- 4256- 662 -66 MANUAL !+ 197A82 08/05/88 4.38 99.44 • AT&T TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -TO MANUAL 94.28 *** -CKS 197C34 08/05/88 20.70 CITY OF RICHFIELD NSP ADMS HILL PARK 10 -4252- 345 -30 MANUAL r 20.70 • •�� * ** * ** -CKS r 197U27 _ _ _ _ 148.51 ._ U8 WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10 -4201- 622 -66 MANUAL 197U27 08/05/88 7.85 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE _ 10 -4256- 460 -46 MANUAL r 19TUET 08/05/88 348.56 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256-510 -51 MANUAL ' 197UET -__ - 08/05/88 101.82___ _ _ US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10- 4256-628 -62 MANUAL 19TUET 08/05/88 40.86 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 10-4258 - 646 -64 MANUAL r 19TUET 08/05/88 15.02 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 23-4256- 611 -61 MANUAL 197UET. -_ -__ 08/05/88 307.56 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 27 -4256- 662 -66 MANUAL 197U27 08/05/88 233.29 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 28- 4256 - 702 -70 MANUAL • 197U27 08/05/88 30T.80 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 40-4256-803 -80 MANUAL 19TU27 08/05/88 15.02 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50-4256- 821 -82 MANUAL 197U2T 08/05/88 14.10 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50-4256 - 841 -84 MANUAL w 197U27 08/05/88 14.10 US WEST COMM TELEPHONE 50 -4256- 861 -86 MANUAL - - - - -- - -- - - -1, 554, 49 1p * * * * ** **o-CKS 200R27 08/05/88 6.00 JOYCE REPYA CONFERENCE 10 -4202- 600 -60 MANUAL v 200R2T 08/05/88 13.25 JOYCE REPYA LICENSE TABS 10- 4310 - 560 -56 MANUAL 200R27 08/05/88 __. 51-50 -._ -_- ._JOYCE REPYA _ LICENSE PLATES 10- 4310 - 560 -56 MANUAL E00R27 08/05/88 6.71 JOYCE REPYA _ _ _ SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 540-54 MANUAL r/ 200827 08/05/88 10.68 JOYCE REPYA REPAIR PARTS 10- 4540 - 560 -56 MANUAL - 88.14 * - lr * ** *** * ** -CKS 20fE11 08/04/88 4.24- EAGLE WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL • 201E11 08/04/88 26.16- EAGLE WINE 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 201E11 08/04/88 E12.23 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 201E11 06/04/88 1,307.85 EAGLE WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL • j 1,489.68 000-CKS • 201E26 _ 08/04/88 9.22 -. ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 201E26 08/04/88 1.82- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -8E MANUAL • 201EE6 08/04/88 5.60- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 201E26 08/04/88_ 1.85- _ - - -ED PHILLIPS _-- _ - -___ - 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 201E2G 08/04/88 7.00- ED PHILLIPS - _ - -_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL • -' 201E26 08/04/88 1.85 ED PHILLIPS 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL d V 1988 CITY OF EDINA 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL CHECK kQwISTER CHECK NO. DATE AMOUNT 50- 3710 - 862 -86 VENDOR 201E26 08/04/88 23.91- ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 13.18- ED PHILLIPS E01E26 08/04/88 1.85- ED PHILLIPS EOIE26 08/04/88 .73- ED PHILLIPS 201E26 _ 08/04/88 .29- ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 35.94- ED PHILLIPS 201E25 08/04/88 461.14 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 11195.90 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 350.40 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 1,797.18 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 -__ 08/04/88 560.55 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 182.70 ED PHILLIPS EOlE26 08/04/88 1,318.75 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 185.EO ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 185.20- ED PHILLIPS 201E26 08/04/88 185.E0 ED PHILLIPS 201E26 _ 08/04/88 73.65 ED PHILLIPS E01E26 08/04/68 29.00 ED PHILLIPS 140.16- GRIGGS 6,054.93 AND C 07 -31 -8b .-AGE 6 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50-3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50-46EG-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 622 -82 MANUAL 50-4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 848 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842-84 MANUAL 50-46ES- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -46E8- 862-86 MANUAL 50-4628-868 -86 MANUAL 201G82 08/04/88 _ 5.71 -_ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 57.25- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 4.51- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G8E 08/04/88 33.71-. 50 -4626- 822 -82 COOPER AND C EO1G82 08/04/88 92.39- GRIGGS COOPER AND C E01982 08/04/86 11.42- GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ 201G8E _08/04/88 _ _ E1 .35 -_ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 11.42- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201982 08/04/88 65.22- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 20.40- __. GRIGGS COOPER AND C E01G82 08/04/88 285.50 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 2,862.70 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82• 08/04/88 E25.41 _ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201682 08/04/88 4,619.40 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 140.16- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 1,685.27- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G8E 08/04/88 571.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 15.20- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201 GSE - _- .__ .08/04/88 - _ _ - _ 3,260.9S _ _ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 08/04/88 1,067.40 GRIGGS COOPER AND C EO1G82 08/04/88 571.00 GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201682 08/04/88 4.33- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 201G82 06/04/88 68.85- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 14,596.71 _ 1.77- JOHNSON WINE v JOHNSON WINE " 201J62 _ _- 08/04/88 41.79- 201J62 08/04/88 1.73- 201J62 08/04/88 "i 201J62 201J62 08/04/88 08/04/88 50- 4626 - 822 -82 201 J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL _ 1.77- JOHNSON WINE 10.71- JOHNSON WINE 4.02- JOHNSON WINE 41.79- JOHNSON WINE_ 1.73- JOHNSON WINE 3.19- JOHNSON WINE r** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL _._ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50-4626 - 822-82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL * ** -CKS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL J w v • • • • • • • 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 7 wi CHECK NO, _DATE.— - _ AMOUNT - -_- VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. B P.O. 9 MESSAGE w 201J62 08/04/88 109.93— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 .64— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 .52— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL yr 201J62 08/04/88 328.26— JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 535.15 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL r 201J62 08/04/88 34.50— JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 2,089.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 8.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL ar 201J62 08/04/88 536.83— JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 201J62 _ 08/04/88 86.00— _ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 21.70 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626-862 -86 MANUAL r 201J62 08/04/88 5,496.70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862-86 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 366.63 — JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 101JG2 08/04/88 1.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 403.50 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 101JG2 08/04/88 -. -_- 8.75 _ _ -__ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 177.89 JOHNSON WINE _. 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL w 201J62 08/04/88 41.43- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 91.99 -_ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101J62 08/04/88 2.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL r.. 201JG2 08/04/88 4.98- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 101 J62 -- 08/04/88 _ 173.04 _- - -___- JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 3.8S JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL w 201J62 08/04/88 .70 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4618- 862 -86 MANUAL tO1J62 08/04/88 _73.eS- _ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 86E -86 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 .70 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL w 101JG2 08/04/88 63.90 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 101 J62 ___ 08/04/88 __ 51 .81-.___— JOHNSON WINE - _ - 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 201J62 08/04/88 35.17- JOHNSON - WINE -- 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL w 101J62 08/04/88 320.10 JOHNSON WINE 50-4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 7,588.56 • * * * *e* * ** -CKS 201P20 08/04/88 5.00 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL v tO1P20 08/04/88 105.36 PAUSTIS 6 SONS 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL - - _ 21 0. 36- -- -- - r * ** —CKS 201P82 08/04/88 1.27— PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL r 201P82 08/04/88 3.46— PRIOR WINE CO 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 201P82 08/04/88 _- 63.73 _. PRIOR WINE CO _ 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 101P82 08/04/88 172.80 PRIOR WINE CO 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 231.80 • 201016 08/04/88 1.73— QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 14.62— QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 822-82 MANUAL r ' 101016 08/04/88 .76- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842-84 MANUAL 201016_— 08/04/88 7,_15- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 201016 06/04/88 .76 QUALITY WINE _ 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL r 201016 08/04/88 1.02- QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL • • • • • • • 1988 L. OF EDINA CHECK h�.ISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 8 CHECK NO. DATE_ _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. A MESSAGE 201Q16 08/04/88 28.64- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 19.59- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 23.52- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 780.82 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 1,432.37 QUALITY WINE 50- 4686-842 -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 979.00 QUALITY WINE 90-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 1,175.95 QUALITY WINE 50 -4626- 862 -86 MANUAL E01016 08/04/88 172.35 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 75.49- QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 4 201016 08/04/88 75.49 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 75.49 -.__ _QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 201.72 QUALITY WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL p 201016 08/04/88 75.49 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 84E -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 713.60 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 201016 08/04/88 75.49- QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �- 5,282.05 • •••�s• ••• -CKS 202701 08/05/88 150.00 WILLIAM BOWLER UNIFORM ALLOWANCE., 10- 4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • 202702 _ _ 150.00 DENNIS CAIN_ UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 i 202703 08/05/88 150.00 _ BRUCE GATES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • 202704 _08/05/88_ -_ ___ 150. 00 -_ --- RICHARD HELMER _ UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1 0 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 _ 202705 08/05/88 150.00 JAMES JULKOWSKI UNIFORM ALLOWANCE -- 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 _ 202706_ „_ -- __08/05/88_ - 150.00 STEPHEN LANDRY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • . . 202707 08/05/88 _ 150.00 - ROBERT LAWSON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • 202708___ -_ _08/05/88_ -_____ __ 150.00 LEROY LISK- - UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 �- - -- - _202709 08/05/88 _ _ _. 150.00 WILLIAM LUTTS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE _ 10- 4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • 1 ' 0 1 202710 ____ 08 /OS /BB -_ _ - _ _ _ -- 150.00 _ -JOHN -MALONEY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MANUAL 150.00 • _____i_0-4e66-440-44 0 202711 -_ 08/05/88 150.00 ANDREW MEDZIS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE _ 10- 4266 - 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • �s _202712_ 08/05/88 150.00 RICHARD MYRE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 • -- - - - -- - v 202713 08/05/88 150.00 DAVID RADATZ UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL i1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO. DATE.- _ _. AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION 07 -31 -88 PAGE 9 ACCOUNT NO. INV. 9 P.O. N MESSAGE r 150.00 w 202714 08/05/88 150.00 ALLEN ROTHE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 « 202715 08/05/88 150.00 PATRICK RUNNING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 w 202716 08/05/88 150.00 RONALD SAMUELSON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10-4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 « 202717 08/05/88 150.00 JAMES SINGLETON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 w 202718 08/05/88 150.00 GREG SMEGAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 w -- wwwsww - - _ - -- - - -- - - - -- - - - - www -CKS 202722 08/03/88 150.00 RICHARD VERNON UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10- 4266 - 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 « 202723 - - -._ - -- 08/04/88 __- _ 42.75 -_ THE WINE COMPANY 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 202723 08/04/88 .75 THE WINE COMPANY _ 50-4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 43.50 « *00-CKS 202850 _ _ -_ 08/05/88 _ _ 150.00 DOUGLAS BAGLEY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 10 -4266- 440 -44 MANUAL 150.00 - - ww «-CKS 202805 08/05/88 14.12 BILL BACH POOL REPAIR 30- 4248 - 783 -78 MANUAL 202805 08/05/88 - 23.48 BILL BACH _ PROPANE GAS 30- 4254 - 782 -78 MANUAL 202805, 08/05/88 56.09 BILL BACH POSTAGE 30- 4290 - 781 -78 MANUAL 202805 08/05/88 35.21 BILL BACH SUPPLIES 30- 4504 - 781 -78 MANUAL 202805 08/05/88 _... e6.09 BACH SUPPLIES ., _ 30- 4504 - 782-78 MANUAL 202805 08/05/88 2.12 BILL BACH SUPPLIES 30- 4516 - 781 -78 MANUAL 157.11 w www «ww 000-CKS 202P36 08/05/88 _ 20.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10 -2148- 000 -00 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 7.55 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10- 4206 - 200 -20 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 14.12 PETTY CASH SEMINAR 10- 4206 - 200 -20 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 _ 5.85 PETTY CASH _ - SUPPLIES_ 10-4SO4-140-14 MANUAL I' 202P36 08/05/88 7.78 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 140 -14 _ MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 3.34 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 600 -60 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 _ _ 3.19 _--_._ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 1.58 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL _ 202P36 08/05/88 6.99 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 202P36 - 08/05/88 _-9.53 _ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES _ _ 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 20EP36 08/05/88 3.98 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES _ -10- 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 12.85 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL X71/ 1988 f OF EDINA CHECk ISTER 07 -31 -� AGE 10 CHECK NO- .,.__DATE__- __._ -____ AMOUNT _ -_- _VENDOR _ ITEM DESCRIPTION _. __ACCOUNT. -N0._ INV. # P.O. # MESSAGE 202P36 08/05/88 1.74 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 6.99 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 4 MOEP36 EOEP36 08/05/88 08/05/88 18.50 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 MANUAL ZOEP35 4.02 10.75 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 202P36 _08/05/88 08/05/88 8.66 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 10- 4504-624 -62 MANUAL ZOEP36 08/05/88 18.59 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 10- 4504-624 -BZ MANUAL MANUAL Z02P35 E0ZP36 08/05/88 08/05/88 4.16 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -6E MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 10.95 10.32 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504-624 -6Z MANUAL ROEP36 08/05/88. _- 1.45 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL E02P36 08/05/88 10.89 _ PETTY CASH _ SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 10 -450q- 624 -62 MANUAL ZOEP36 202P36 08/05/88 37.71 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES E6- 4504 - 682 -68 MANUAL MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 08/05/88 E4.00 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 26 -4642- 681 -68 MANUAL 202P36 08/05/88 24.00 24.00- PETTY CASH PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 26- 4642- 681 -88 MANUAL - -. -- -- -- - 265.49 t SUPPLIES E6- 4642 - 681 -88 MANUAL *009-CKS 204897 08/03/88 70.00 BYERLYS MEETING EXPENSE 10 -4206- 420 -42 MANUAL 70.00 t ttt-CKS 204033 08/05/88 128,000.00 -- CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 50 -1010- 000 -00 MANUAL G Z04C33 08/05/88 128,000.00 CITY OF EDINA _ _ PAYROLL TRANSFER _ 50-1010- 000 -00 MANUAL .00 t # # ### 000-CKS 207F19 08/05/88 135,775.00 _ _ FIRST TRUST DUE FROM HRA 10 -1145- 000 -00 MANUAL Z07F19 08/05/88 65,56E.50 FIRST TRUST DUE FROM HRA 10-1145- 000 -00 MANUAL Z07F19 08/05/88 315,125.00 FIRST TRUST INTEREST EXPENSE 66- 4300 - 000 -00 MANUAL - - - - -_ ------ - -- - -- -- - - - - -- - -51 8, 462.50 t -_ ttt -CKS 207L98 08/05/88 50.41 ED MACHOLDA PROF SERVICES 26- 4201 - 682 -68 MANUAL _ 50.41 t ttt -CKS 208C47__- 08/05/88 406.80 - COMM_LIFE INSURANCE LIFE INSURANCE _ 10 -4157- 510 -51 MANUAL 406.80 t ttt -CKS 208F14 08/03/88 13,445.04 FIDELITY BANK CITY PAID FICA 10- 4149 - 510 -51 MANUAL 208F14 08/03/88 984.37, _ FIDELITY BANK CITY PAID MEDICARE 10- 4162 - 510 -51 MANUAL W 14,429.41 t - n ttt # ## - - - m**-CKS ° 209E26 08/04/88 1.53- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL . vim, 1998 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 11 CHECK N0, DATE AMOUNT _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. A P.O. M MESSAGE .. 209E26 08/04/88 49.80— ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 12.00— ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 .68- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL r. 209E26 08/04/88 .31- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 - 08/04/88 16.83- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 .94- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL v 209E26 08/04/88 3.68- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 69.23- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842-84 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 7.80- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL r.. 209E26 08/04/88 5.67- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710-862 -86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 .34 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 1.03- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL v 209E26 08/04/88 7.23- ED PHILLIPS 50-3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 1.03 ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862-86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 1.03 ED PHILLIPS 50-3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL `. 209E26 08/04/88 81.65- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 209EZ6 -. - -_- 08/04/88. -_ 1.03 -- _ ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ MANUAL Z09E26 08/04/88 1.03- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL v Z09EEG 08/04188 600.44 ED PHILLIPS 50-4826- 822 -82 MANUAL Z09EZ6 08/04/88 1,490.24 __. ED PHILLIPS 50-4626- 8E2 -82 MANUAL E09E26 08/04/88 390.20 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626-842 -84 MANUAL �r 209E26 08/04/88 3,461.81 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-842-84 MANUAL Z09EZ6 08/04/88 4,082.50 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 68.35 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL rr 209E26 08/04/88 153.05 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 94.00 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 31.00 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL �. 209E26 08/04/88 368.55 ED PHILLIPS 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 _ 08/04/88 _1,683.70 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 103.98- ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL rr 209E26 08/04/88 103.98 ED PHILLIPS 50- 46E8- 86E -86 MANUAL E09EE6 08/04/88 103.98 -. ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-862 -86 MANUAL 209E26 08/04/88 723.65 ED PHILLIPS S0 -4628- 862-86 MANUAL r Z09E26 08/04/85 103.98 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209EZ6 _ 08/04/88 __. 567.95 _ ED PHILLIPS _ _ 50- 4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL Z09EZ6, 08/04/88 33.60- ED PHILLIPS 50-4628-862-86 MANUAL V E09EE6 08/04/88 103.98 ED PHILLIPS 50-4628 - 862 -86 MANUAL - - 14, SET. 78 • - -- -- - �r sf►�st • +' -CKS 209G82 08/04/88 10.00- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3700 - 822 -82 MANUAL r 209G82 08/04,088 20.00- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209G82 _ 08/04/88 - 38.70---- __ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3700-862 -86 MANUAL 209G82 08/04/88 20.00- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209G82 08/04/88 38.10- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 209G82 08/04/88_______ _ _7.05- __GRIGGS COOPER AND C _ _ 50- 371 0- 822 -82 MANUAL 209G82 08/04/88 3.07- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710- S22 -82 MANUAL r 209G82 08/04/88 6.61- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL .' 209G82 08/04/88 _. _ 14.31- _ GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 809GSE 08/04/88 7.03- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209G82 08/04/88 32.94- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50 -3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ' Z09682 08/04/88_ __1.68- - GRIGGS COOPER AND C__ _ 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL I 209G82 08/04/88 18.95- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL r'° Z09G82 08/04/88 9.78- GRIGGS COOPER AND C 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL �l 1988 , OF EDINA CHECK NO .__DATE _ __ ___ _ - __ AMOUNT 209G82 08/04/88 34.03 - 209G82 08/04/88 7.51 - 209G82 08/04/88 18.66 - 209G82 08/04/88 11905.22 209682 08/04/88 330.48 209G82 _ 08/04/88 .1 , 647. 24 209G82 08/04/88 932.88 209G82 08/04/88 375.34 Z09G8Z 08/04/88 352.47 209682 08/04/88 .00 209G82 08/04/88 153.37 E09GSE _ 08/04/88 714.60_____ 209GSE 08/04/88 351.33 Z09GSZ 08/04/88 .00 209682 08/04/88 488.94 _ 209682 08/04/88 947.29 209G62 08/04/88 83.90 209G82 08/04/88 __- _._ _ _ _- -.00 209682 08/04/88 .00 JOHNSON WINE --27089 6-7 0 MANUAL �. 7,995.64 * •�ssa• 6.92- - -- CHECK ISTER VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIG63 COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C _GRIGGS COOPER AND C GRIGGS COOPER AND C 07 -31 -L AGE 12 _- ACCOUNT NO. INV. _A P.O. 9 MESSAGE 50- 4632- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL 50-4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4628-822 -8Z MANUAL 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50-4628- 842-84 MANUAL 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL •*• -CKS _- c r i • 209J62 _ 2.70----- JOHNSON WINE_ 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 8.58- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL l 209162 08/04/88 2.22- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL Z09J62 06/04/68 _ 74.33 - JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 11.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 6.18- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL Z09J62 08/04/88 60.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 60.29 JOHNSON WINE _ _ 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL �. 20SJ62 08/04/88 6.92- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 60.29- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 1.82- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL "�. 209J62 08/04/88 428.82 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - SEE -82 MANUAL _ 209J6E 08/04/88 1.40____ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 8E2 -82 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 3,715.98 JOHNSON WINE 50-4626- 84E -84 MANUAL 209162 08/04/88 15.40 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL E09JGE 08/04/88 14.00- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 3,014.66 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL- 209J62 08/04/88 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- S62 -86 MANUAL 209J62 _ 08/04/88__ _ _ 3,014.66 -----.JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 3,014.66- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 14.00 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 862 -86 MANUAL 209162 08/04/88- 269.98--.- WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 2.80 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 209162 08/04/88 E21.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL ';___.209J62 08/04/88_ _ 5.25 JOHNSON WINE_ __ 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL j 209162 08/04/88 618.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 209162 08/04/88 1,113.86 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 209J62 _- 08/04/88 _ 13.65 - _ - - -___ JOHNSON WINE _ 50- 4628 - 84E -84 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 12.25 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 209J62 08/04/88 7.35 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 209162 _08/04/88 4.20_ JOHNSON WINE - - -- - 50 -4628- 862-86 MANUAL j 209J6e 08/04/88 694.66 JOHNSON �- - - WINE - - - -�- - -- - - - 50-4628 - 86E -86 - - - - - -- MANUAL 209162 08/04/88 161.94 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL c r i • v 1988 CITY OF EDINA CHECK NO. DATE v CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PACE 13 AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION _ ACCOUNT NO. INV. -# P.O. A MESSAGE_ 10,161.92 LAUNDRY LAUNDRY. LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 210B73 * * * * ** 510.13 BRAEMAR GOLF v 209016 08/04/88 .. _ _.. 39.48 .__ - -_ QUALITY WINE BRAEMAR 209016 08/04/88 1.55- QUALITY WINE .. 209016 08/04/88 39.48- QUALITY WINE CASH 209016 08/04/88 39.48- QUALITY WINE GOLF 209016 08/04/88 8.13- QUALITY WINE v 209016 08/04/88 45.71- QUALITY WINE 209016 _ 08/04/88 QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 10.74- QUALITY WINE ' 209016 08/04/88 1,973.93- QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 1,973.93 QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 2,286.19 QUALITY WINE �. 209016 08/04/88 967.30 QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 -__ ._ 1,973.93 _ _ QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 154.10 QUALITY WINE 209016 08/04/88 812.45 QUALITY WINE 209416 - 08/04/88 __ 1, OT2.55 ___. _ ..QUALITY WINE 7,141.56 209T22 08/04/88 85.50 THE WINE COMPANY 209T22 08/04/88 2.00 THE WINE COMPANY. 87.50 * * * * ** 209W89 08/04/88 192.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 209W89 _ 08/04/88 3.00 WORLD CLASS WINES 195.00 * * * * ** 21OA49 08/03/88 31.09 AMER LINEN E10A49 08/03/88 _- _. 48.07 AMER LINEN E10A49 08/03/88 11.60 AMER LINEN r E10A49 08/03/88 486.94 AMER LINEN 21 OA49 08/03/88 _ 95.82 _AMER LINEN 21OA49 08/03/88 60.48 AMER LINEN • 21OA49 08/03/88 98.85 AMER LINEN - - - - - 832.85 • LAUNDRY LAUNDRY. LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 210B73 08/03/88 510.13 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH • 210973 08/03/88 128.56 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 210BT3 08/03/88 23.00 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 21OB73 08/03/88 12.90 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH ' E10873 08/03/88 E4.75 BRAEMAR GOLF PETTY CASH 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50- 3710 - 822 -82 50-3710- 822 -82 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710 - 842 -84 50- 3710- 862 -86 50- 3710 - 862 -86 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626 - 822 -82 50- 4626- 842 -84 50- 4626 - 862 -86 50- 4628- 822 -82 50- 4628- 822-82 50 -4628- 842 -84 50-4628- 862 -86 50- 4628- 842 -84 50- 4628-842-84 50- 4628- 842 -84 50-4628- 842 -84 10- 4262 - 482 -48 10- 4262 - 520 -52 10- 4262-628-62 30- 4262 - 782 -78 _. 50- 4262- 821 -82 50-4262- 841 -84 50 -4262- 861 -86 * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL *00-CKS MANUAL MANUAL * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL MANUAL , **O-CKS 27-4120- 663 -66 MANUAL E7- 4120 - 666 -66 MANUAL 27-4202- 661-66 MANUAL 27- 4204 - 661 -66 MANUAL 27- 4516-661-66 MANUAL o**-CKS , 1988 _ .Y OF EDINA CHECK .- _iISTER 07 -31-8b PAGE 14 CHECK _N0._- DATE________ __- AMOUNT -------.-VENDOR-- ITEM DESCRIPTION_ - - __ACCOUNT N0. INV. A P.O. 4 MESSAGE 210051 08/05/88 18.16 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 10 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 227.35 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 23-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 4,001.84 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 210051______ 08/05/88 __.._ 4,301.84- ______- , -COMM OF REVENUE _ SALES TAX _ 26 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 4,301.84 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 26- 3357 - 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 6,467.08 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 27 -3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 13.20 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 28-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 41.60 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 29-33S7- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 82.82 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAAX 30 -3357- 000-00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88. 937.61_ COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 40-3357- 000 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/OS/88 3,876. &8 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50 -3357- 001 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 8,003.24 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357- 002 -00 MANUAL 210051 08/05/88 6,961.17 COMM OF REVENUE SALES TAX 50- 3357 - 003 -00 MANUAL r 30,630.35 • * ** -CKS •' 210M24 08/03/88 9,427.11 MED CTR HEALTH PL CITY PORTION PREMIUM 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL - 9,427.11 * * * *M* we*-CKS 21OP36 08/05/88 22.00 PETTY CASH CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10 -4201- 600 -60 MANUAL &IOP36 08/05/88 3.50 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10 -4EOE- 490-49 MANUAL &1OP36 08/05/88 3.50 -- _ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10 -4202- 490 -49 MANUAL 210P36 08/05/88 3.50 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4202- 490 -49 MANUAL 210P35 08/05/88 3.91- PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10 -4 &06- 490 -49 MANUAL 21OP36_ -_ 08/05/88 3.91_ -- PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4 &06 - 490 -49 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 7.50 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 10-4206-490-49 MANUAL �• &1OP36 08/05/88 5.09 PETTY CASH POSTAGE 10 -4290- 140 -14 MANUAL 210P36 08/05/88 3.91 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 520 -52 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 7.25 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 623 -62 MANUAL &1OP36 08/05/88 14.41 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504- 623-62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 __10.00____ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504- 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 8.93 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL &1OP36 08/05/88 18.66 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504- 624 -62 MANUAL G' 21OP36-- . 08/05/88 1.38 -- _ _ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10-4504-6E4-62 MANUAL 21OP36 21OP36 08/05/88 3.16 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 . MANUAL 08/05/88 6.32 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 - 12.18 _ PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 9.11 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/68 8.37 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 _ ______08/05/88 _ - _ - __. 9.99 - -__ -_ _ PETTY- CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 8.24 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES _ 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 14.74 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10 -4504- 624 -62 MANUAL - -_ 21 OP36__ 08/05/88 - ___ 7.65_ PETTY - CASH _ SUPPLIES 1 0- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 210P36 08%05%88 CASH 21.52 PETTY _ _ SUPPLIES _ _ 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 31.71 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -6E MANUAL 210P36 08/05/88 12.94 _- PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 21OP36 21OP36 08/05/88 08/05/88 9.65 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 624 -62 MANUAL 10.88 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 10- 4504 - 627 -62 MANUAL _ __ 21 OP36 08/05/88_ _ 19.s2 PETTY CASH SUPPLIES 1 0- 4504 - 627 -62_ MANUAL 210P36 08/05/88 1.49 PETTY CASH _ _ SUPPLIES 40-4504- 801 -S0 _ __ MANUAL 210P36 08/05/88 6.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 50- 4206 - 820 -82 MANUAL S V. 1.98,8 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 15 ..` CHECK NO.-DATE _ AMOUNT VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. 0 P.O. A MESSAGE I' ., 21OP36 08/05/88 6.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 50- 4206 - 820 -82 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 6.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 50- 4206 - 820 -82 MANUAL 21OP36 08/05/88 6.00- PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 50 -4206- 840 -84 MANUAL ., 21OP36 08/05/88 6.00 PETTY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 50- 4206 - 840 -84 MANUAL , -- — - 308.10 * -- ,," *aaaaa *o*-CKS 21OP42 08/03/88 13,345.16 PHP OF MN CITY PREMIUM FOR PHP 10- 4156 - 510 -51 MANUAL ., 13,345.16 • s *a *aaa * ** -CKS 211P32 08/03/88 22,578.52 PERA PERA 10 -4145- 510 -51 MANUAL 22,576.52 :11P70 * ** -CKS 08/03/88 51000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 10 -4290- 510 -51 MANUAL , - - -.- 51000.00 - ** *aaa *aa -CKS 215CO6 08/04/88 71.97 CAPITOL CITY DIST. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215CO6 08/04/88 71.97 CAPITOL CITY DIST. 50- 4628-842 -84 MANUAL , 215C06 08/04/88 2.40 CAPITOL CITY DIST-. 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215C06 08/04/88 71.97- CAPITOL CITY DIST. 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215CO6 08/04/88 2.40- CAPITOL CITY DIST. 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL , 215C06____- 08/04/86 2.40- ___CAPITOL_CITY DIST. - — 50 -4628- 842-84 MANUAL 74.37 * ** -CKS r 215E17 08/04/88 250.00 EASTSIDE BEV 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL , Z1SE1T_ ___08/04/88 _ __ ___ 125.00. ___EASTSIDE BEV _ _ _ _ _ 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 375.00 _ - - -- - - - - -- - - -- - -- - * ** -CKS 215E26 08/04/88 12.74- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL , 215E26 _ -- 08/04/88 - -_ - 7.41 -_ ED PHILLIPS_ - _ - -_- _ 50- 3710 - 822 -S2 MANUAL E15E26 08/04/88 .21- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-822 -82 MANUAL 215E26 08/04/88 3.48- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL ' 215226 - 08/04/88 4.26- ED PHILLIPS _ -_ 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 215E26 08/04/88 55.35- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710-842 -84 MANUAL i 215E26 08/04/88 4.66- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL , 215E26__08/04/68 —1-23- = ED_ PHILLIPS _ -_ - 50- 3710- 862- 86 MANUAL 215E26 08/04/88 19.97- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 _ - MANUAL 215E26 08/04/88 9.72- ED PHILLIPS 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL , 215E26 08/04/88 637.01 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-822 -82 MANUAL 215E26 08/04/88 2,767.88 ED PHILLIPS 50-4626-842-84 MANUAL ', 215E26 08/04/88 998.75 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4626-862 -86 MANUAL , "f BISE26_ 08/04/88 741 .50 ED__PHILLIPS �_- _ 50- 4628 - 822-82 MANUAL IR` 215E26 08/04/88 348.95 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628 - 822 -82 _ _ MANUAL ♦ "i }7.. 215E26 08/04/88 21.45 ED PHILLIPS 50- 4628-822 -82 MANUAL , • 07 -31 -88 PAGE 16 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. ! P.O. • MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 000 —CKS 50- 3700 - 842 -84 ssssss 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 1988 f OF EDINA "i 215J62 CHECK ..— dISTER I _ -- CHECK_NO.__DATE_--- ___ _ AMOUNT _ VENDOR (r 215E26 08/04/88 466.40 ED PHILLIPS 215J62 08/04/88 215E26 08/04/88 426.65 ED PHILLIPS 215J62 08/04/88 215E26 08/04/88 123.60 ED PHILLIPS 215J62 ___ kt 215E26 08/04/88 9T2.40 ED PHILLIPS 215J62 08/04/88 50-4628- 84E -84 - - - -- 7, 385.56 - - -- 215J62 (r *sssss 215J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 215G82 08/04/88 8.65- GRIGGS COOPER MANUAL 215G82 08/04/88 3.16- GRIGGS COOPER 13.30 215682 08/04/88 _.- 2.80- GRIGGS COOPER JOHNSON 215G82 08/04/88 21.17- GRIGGS COOPER le 215G82 08/04/88 3.30- GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 08/04/88 17.20- GRIGGS COOPER E15G82 08/04/88 5.41- GRIGGS COOPER ! 215G82 08/04/88 19.61- GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 _ _ 08/04/88 86.59- GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 08/04/88 _ 9.71- _ GRIGGS COOPER 215GSE 08/04/88 8.11- GRIGGS COOPER E15G82 08/04/88 38.99- GRIGGS COOPER 215682 08/04/88 28.64- GRIGGS COOPER EISG82 08/04/88 3.30- GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 _ - 08/04/88 1,058.35 GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 08/04/88 165.24 GRIGGS COOPER 1r C13GSE 08/04/08 4,329.58 GRIGGS COOPER 215G82 08/04/88 165.24 GRIGGS COOPER 21SG82 08/04/88 1,949.33 GRIGGS COOPER. t 213682 00/04/88 839.75 GRIGGS COOPER E15GSE __- _ -_ 08/04/88 _ _ _ _ _ 251 .00 GRIGGS COOPER E15G0E 08/04/88 980.30 GRIGGS COOPER to E15GOE 08/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER E15G8E 08/04/88 485.74 GRIGGS COOPER E15GSE 08/04/88 .00 GRIGGS COOPER 1e E15G8E 00/04/88 405.47 GRIGGS COOPER _ E15G82_ 08/04/88 _ 1,431.99 GRIGGS COOPER E15G82 08/04/88 .00 GRIGGS _ COOPER � , 11,826.15 • 07 -31 -88 PAGE 16 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. ! P.O. • MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 000 —CKS 50- 3700 - 842 -84 ssssss 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 215J62- _08/04/88 "i 215J62 08/04/88 50- 3710 - 822 -8E 215J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 215J62 ___._08/04/88 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 215J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 50- 3710 - 862 -86 215J62._ 06/04/88 ". 215J62 08/04/88 trl 215J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 215J62 ___ 08/04/88 50 -46E6- 862 -86 215J62 08/04/88 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 50-4628- 84E -84 215J62 08/04/88 I'I 215J62 08/04/88 4w 215J62 08/04/88 07 -31 -88 PAGE 16 ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO. INV. ! P.O. • MESSAGE 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 000 —CKS 50- 3700 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50 -3700- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 50- 3700 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 822 -8E MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 3710- 862 -86 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626-842 -84 MANUAL 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 50 -46E6- 862 -86 MANUAL 50-4628 - 822 -8E MANUAL _ 50 -46E8- 822 -BE MANUAL 50-4628- 84E -84 MANUAL 50-46E8- 84E-84 MANUAL ' -- 50- 46E8-84E-84 MANUAL 50-4628 - 84E -84 MANUAL 50- 4620- 86E -86 MANUAL 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL s a s s **O—CKS 5.00— WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 11.42— JOHNSON WINE 50-3710-822 -82 MANUAL 55.60— JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 4.76-- _ JOHNSON WINE _ _ _ _ 50- 371 0- 842 -84 MANUAL 4.76- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -64 MANUAL 4.76 JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 15.se- _JOHNSON WINE 50-3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 14.98- JOHNSON WINE _ __ _ - -- 50- 3710 - 842 -84 _ _ MANUAL 3.13- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL ... 1 .55 -_____ 35.47- JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE _ _ WINE _ _ _ 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 7.79- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 662 -86 MANUAL 10.26- JOHNSON WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 13.30 JOHNSON _ - WINE _ __ __ 50-3710- 862 -86 - MANUAL 2,779.68 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL s a s s T Il 2908 CITY OF EDINA CHECK REGISTER 07 -31 -88 PAGE 17 i CHECK NO—DATE --- --- _ _ AMOUNT _ _ _ VENDOR ITEM DESCRIPTION. ___ ACCOUNT NO. INV. N P.O. N MESSAGE ' _ 215J62 08/04/88 236.41 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 236.41- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 842 -84 MANUAL 215362 08/04/88 1.40 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 215J62 08/04/88 5,778.81 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 215J62 - - - -- 06/04/88 29.7S--------JOHNSON WINE 50 -4626- 842 -84 MANUAL EISJ62 08/04/88 1.40 JOHNSON _ WINE 50- 4628- 842-84 MANUAL _ 215J62 08/04/88 1.40- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 237.81 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4626- 842 -84 MANUAL 215362 08/04/88 1,773.63 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL _. 215362 08/04/88 6.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4626 - 862 -86 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 498.28 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 10.15 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822 -82 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 1,145.64 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 2ISJ62 08/04/88 11.42 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628 - 822-82 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 1,498.79 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _. 215362 08/04/88 1.40 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL EISJ6208/04/88- _ 3.85 _ -_ - -_ JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215362 08/04/88 5.09- JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 215362 08/04/86 155.75 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215362 08/04/88 312.30 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 33.95 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 842 -84 MANUAL _ 215362 08/04/88 779.80 JOHNSON WINE 50 -4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 _ 22.05 JOHNSON WINE 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 8.75 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 215J62 08/04/88 1,029.21 JOHNSON WINE SO- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 15,861.39 +_ « «« -CKS 215016 08/04/88 11.15- DUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 822 -82 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 23.51- QUALITY WINE 50-3710- 822 -82 MANUAL 215016 V8/04/88 _ 46.77- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 .80- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 842 -84 MANUAL s. 215Q16 08/04/88 1.60- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 842 -84 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 15.0E - - ---. QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 84E -84 MANUAL 215016', 08/04/88 9.96- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL _ 215016 06/04/88 49.82- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710- 86E -86 MANUAL 215016 __ 08/04/88 -__ 2.27 -_ QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 1.91- QUALITY WINE 50- 3710 - 862 -86 MANUAL 215016 06/04/88 1,175.85 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 822 -82 MANUAL 2,338.12_ _QUALITY WINE 50- 4626- 842 -84___ MANUAL 215Q16 08/04/88 2,490.40 QUALITY WINE 50- 4626 - 662 -86 MANUAL . 215016 08/04/88 1,112.65 QUALITY WINE 50- 4628- 822 -82 MANUAL 215016 _.___ 08/04/88 80.00 _ _ _ QUALITY WINE _ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 1,497.20 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 41. 72- QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 842 -84 MANUAL '- 215Q16 08/04/88 160.00 QUALITY WINE_ 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL 215016 08/04/88 226.64 QUALITY WINE 50-4628- 862 -86 MANUAL _ 21S016 08/04/88 994.30 QUALITY WINE 50-4628-862 -86 MANUAL 215016 _ 08/04/88 190.58 _._- QUALITY WINE __. _ 50- 4628- 862 -86 MANUAL 10,061.21 • « «« -CKS 215305 08/04/88 98.00 SALUD AMERICA 50- 4628 - 842 -84 MANUAL T �.1 1988 f OF EDINA CHECk ISTER 07 -31-z ,AGE 18 - CHECK__N0._DATE- __ - - -_ -- AMOUNT ---- _ __ - _ _ - _ ITEM DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT N0. INV. N P.O. M MESSAGE V 98.00 • %w N16 08/05/88 . _ 509.11. NSP POWER E3 -4252- 612 -61 N16 _ 08/05/88 509.11- NSP _ POWER 23- 425E- 61E -61 �+ .00 + !. 408,953.26 FUND 10 TOTAL GENERAL FUND - 1,E19.87 - _ FUND 23 TOTAL ART CENTER 50363.16 FUND 26 TOTAL SWIMMING POOL FUND %w 12,884.63 --1 - roes -:•4:- FUND 27 TOTAL GOLF COURSE FUND !' 4,538.87 FUND 28 TOTAL RECREATION CENTER FUND 293.93 FUND 29 TOTAL GUN RANGE FUND a 10,373.98 FUND 30 TOTAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 48,380.41 _ FUND 40 TOTAL UTILITY FUND 144, 021.00 FUND 50 TOTAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND %w 313,1E5.00 FUND 66 TOTAL IMP BOND REDEMPTION VE 951,154.11 TOTAL b tr M r , 4w d * ** -CKS MANUAL MANUAL V * ** -CKS 1 1 1 /